diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6f81ec7bd76dbc0cb982c2a2071ee1acc02e616 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.md @@ -0,0 +1,1491 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +50 2009 CA 4 0800 XXXX MB +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 +CASE NO. + +AC + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +COMPLAINT + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: + +SUMMARY OF ACTION + +Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations to the administration of justice, deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, actionable frauds, and the orchestration and conducting of egregious civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious injury to Jeffrey Epstein one of several targets of their misconduct + +and others. Rothstein and RRA's fraud had no boundary; Rothstein and his coconspirators forged Federal court orders and opinions. Amongst the violations of law that are the subject of this lawsuit are the marketing of non-existent Epstein settlements and the sanctioning of a series of depositions that were unrelated to any principled litigation purpose but instead designed to discover extraneous private information about Epstein or his personal and business associates (including well-known public figures) in order to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein. The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions a th pursuit of a civil litigation strategy that was unrelated to the merits or value • dents' cases and, instead, had as its improper purpose the furthering of Roths n s misrepresentations and deceit to third party investors. As a result, Epstein was subject to abusive investigatory tactics, unprincipled media attacks, and unsupportable legal filings. This lawsuit is filed and will be vigorously pursued against all these defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromise the core values of both state and federal justice systems in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint. + +Plaintiff reserves the right to add additional defendants — co-conspirators as the facts and evidence is developed. + +# GENERAL ALLEGATONS + +- 1. This is an action for damages in excess of \$15,000.00, exclusive costs, interest, and attorneys' fees. + +2. Plaintiff, EPSTEIN, is an adult and currently is residing and works in Palm Beach County, Florida. + +3. Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("ROTHSTEIN"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida, and was licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. In November 2009, ROTHSTEIN voluntarily relinquished his law license in the midst of the implosion of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). He was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 20, 2009. On December 1, 2009, ROTHSTEIN was arrested and arraigned in Federal Court in Broward County, Florida. + +4. At all times relevant hereto, ROTHSTEIN was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. + +5. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. + +6. Defendant, Broward County, Florida times relevant hereto, ■ **J. EDWARDS ("I I"), is an individual residing in and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all was an employee, agent, associate, partner, shareholder, and/or other representative of RRA.** + +**7. Defendant, L.M. ("L.M."), is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida. At all times relevant hereto, L.M. was represented by RRA, ROTHSTEIN and in a civil lawsuit against Epstein and was an essential participant in the scheme referenced infra by, among other things, substantially changing prior sworn testimony, so as to assist the Defendants in promoting their fraudulent scheme for the** promise of a multi-million dollar recovery relative to the Civil Actions (defined below) involving Epstein, which was completely out of proportion to her alleged damages. + +8. Non-party, RRA is a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a principal address of 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401. In addition to its principal office, RRA also maintained seven offices in Florida, New York, and Venezuela, and employed over 70 attorneys and 200 support staff. RRA also maintains an office at 1109 NE 2d Street, Hallendale Beach, Florida 33009-8515. RRA, through its attorneys, including those named as Defendants herein, conducted business throughout Florida, and relevant to this action, conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach County, Florida. (RRA is currently a debtor in bankruptcy. RRA is not named as a Defendant). + +### FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS + +9. The United States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the enterprise as being the law firm, RRA, through which Rothstein in conjunction with "his coconspirators" (not yet identified by the USA) engaged in the pattern of racketeering through its base of operation at the offices of RRA from sometime in 2005 up through and continuing into November of 2009. Through various criminal activities, including mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering, the United States of America asserts that + +Rothstein and his co-conspirators unlawfully obtained approximately \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud in connection with a Ponzi scheme. The USA further alleges that "Rothstein and co-conspirators initiated the criminal conduct alleged in the instant Information in order to personally enrich themselves and to supplement the income and sustain the daily operation of RRA." In essence, in the absence of Rothstein and his coconspirators conducting the Ponzi scheme, the daily operation of RRA, which included payroll (compensation to lawyers, staff, investigators, etc.), accounts payable including unlimited improper, harassing and potential illegal investigation on cases, including Epstein-related matters, would in all likelihood would not have been sustainable. A copy of the information is attached as Exhibit 1 to this action. + +10. As more fully set forth herein, RRA held itself out as legitimately and properly engaging in the practice of law. In reality, ROTHSTEIN and others in RRA were using RRA to market investments, as described below, so as to bilk investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars. ROTHSTEIN and others in RRA devised an elaborate plan through which were sold purported confidential assignments of a structured pay-out settlements, supposedly reached on behalf of RRA for clients, in exchange for immediate payments to these clients of a discounted lump sum amount. Investors were being promised in excess of a 30% return on their investment which was to be paid out to the investors over time. While some of the cases relied upon to induce investor funding were existing filed cases, it is believed that the confidential, structured pay-out settlements were all fabricated. + +11. Based on media reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) press conferences and releases and the Information the massive Ponzi scheme and pattern of criminal activity meant to lure investors began sometime in 2005 and continued through the fall of 2009, when the scheme was uncovered by some of the investors and the FBI. As of November of 2009, civil lawsuits were and continue to be filed against various Defendants as result of their massive fraudulent and criminal scheme. + +12. This fraudulent and illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). + +13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpose that it acknowledges that RRA and ROTHSTEIN were in fact conducting an illegal and improper investment or Ponzi scheme based on promises of financial returns from settlements or outcomes of supposed legal actions, including the actions brought against Plaintiff EPSTEIN. The RRA dissolution action alleges in part that — "ROTHSTEIN, the managing partner and CEO of the firm (RRA), has, according to assertions of certain investors, allegedly orchestrated a substantial misappropriation of funds from investor trust accounts that made use of the law firm's name (RRA). The investment business created and operated by ROTHSTEIN centered around the sale of interests in structured settlements." See Preliminary Statement of RRA dissolution action, Exhibit 2 hereto. + +14. In furtherance of the scheme, RRA's letterhead was used in communications regarding investment opportunities in purported structured settlements. RRA's trust account was used to deposit hundreds of millions of dollars or wire transfer of monies from duped investors and other victims. RRA personally guaranteed payments. + +15. Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related matters. See Composite Exhibit 3 hereto. + +16. The details of this fraudulent scheme are being revealed on a daily basis through various media reports and court documents. The most recent estimate of the financial scope of the scheme is that it exceeds \$1.2 billion dollars. + +17. Relevant to this action, EPSTEIN is currently named as a defendant in three civil actions alleging, inter alia, sexual assault and battery that were handled by RRA and its attorneys including prior to its implosion — one of which is filed in federal court (Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla.)(Jane Doe is a named Defendant herein), and two of which have been filed in state court in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, State of Florida, (L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB), (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Civil Actions," and L.M is a named Defendant herein). The Civil Actions were all filed in August and September of 2008. + +18. What is clear is that a fraudulent and improper investment or Ponzi scheme was in fact conducted and operated by RRA and certain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. + +19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake investments." Attorney Sakowitz was also quoted as saying ROTHSTEIN had sophisticated eavesdropping equipment and former law enforcement officers who would sift through a potential defendants' garbage looking for damaging evidence to use with investors to show how potential defendants could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. + +20. Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein Ploy ... as a showpiece as bait. That's the way he raised all the money. He would use. . .cases as bait for luring investors into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there." In fact, on November 20, 2009, William Scherer, on behalf of certain clients, filed a 147 page Complaint against ROTHSTEIN, David Boden, Debra Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., + +Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249 page Amended Complaint naming additional Defendants was filed. + +21. In addition, and upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN, David Soden, Debbie Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten and Kenneth Jenne (all employees of RRA) through brokers or middlemen would stage regular meetings during which false statements were made about the number of cases/clients that existed or RRA had against EPSTEIN and the value thereof. They would show and share actual case files from the EPSTEIN actions with hedge fund managers. Thus, the attorneys and clients have waived any attorney-client or work- product privileges that otherwise may have existed. + +22. Because potential investors were given access to some of the actual Civil Action files, investor-third parties may have became aware of a name of an existing Plaintiff who had filed anonymously against Epstein and had opposed disclosure of her legal name. + +23. In all other instances, by RRA, ROTHSTEIN and claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, they were able to effectively use initials, Jane Doe or other anonymous designations which was a key element in the fraudulent scheme. Fictitious names could be created to make the investors believe many other cases existed against Epstein. + +24. In each of RRA's Civil Actions, the Plaintiffs are or were represented by RRA and its attorneys, including ROTHSTEIN and + +25. In addition, investors were told that in addition to the Civil Actions another fifty (50) plus anonymous females were represented by RRA, with the potential for hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements, and that RRA and its attorneys would sue Epstein unless he paid exorbitant-settlement amounts to protect his high-profile friends. + +26. Upon information and belief, knew or should have known that ROTHSTEIN was utilizing RRA as a front for the massive Ponzi scheme and/or were selling an alleged interest or investment in the Civil Actions (and other claims) involving Epstein. + +27. Further evidencing that (and possibly other attorneys of RRA) knew or should have known and participated in the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme, a front-page Palm Beach Post article, dated November 24, 2009, reported on the recent filing of an amended forfeiture complaint by prosecutors against "dozens of ROTHSTEIN's real estate properties, foreign cars, restaurants and other assets including \$12 million in the lawyer's bank account in Morocco, along with millions more donated to political campaigns and charitable funds." The article further reported that — + +Attorney Scott ROTHSTEIN tapped into millions of dollars from his massive investment scam to cover payroll costs at his expanding Fort Lauderdale law firm, federal authorities said in court records released Monday. + +ROTHSTEIN's law firm (RRA) generated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70-lawyer law firm had a payroll of \$18 million, prosecutors said. ROTHSTEIN, who owned half of RRA used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said. + +Subsequent articles and court filings have reflected ROTHSTEIN received compensation in excess of \$35.7 million in 2008 and \$10.5 million in 2009, while his partner Rosenfeldt received greater than \$6 million in 2008. + +28. ROTHSTEIN attempted to lure the entity known as D3 Capital Club, LLC, ("D3"), by offering D3 "the opportunity" to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00 court settlement against EPSTEIN; yet this supposed settlement never existed and was entirely fabricated. To augment his concocted story, ROTHSTEIN, upon information and belief, invited D3 to his office to view thirteen (13) banker's boxes of case files in Jane Doe (one of the Civil Actions)' in an attempt to substantiate that the claims against EPSTEIN were legitimate and that the evidence obtained against him by RRA, ROTHSTEIN, and (the "Litigation Team") was real. + +29. Upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROTHSTEIN in making these offers by providing confidential, privileged and workproduct information to prospective third-party investors. + +It appears that 13 out of the 40 boxes seized by the FBI as part of its investigation at RRA consisted of files relating to the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN, as reported by counsel for the Bankruptcy Trustee. Until those boxes can be reviewed, as well as other discovery, Epstein will not know the depth of the fraud and those involved. + +30. By using the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN as "bait" and fabricating settlements regarding same, ROTHSTEIN and others were able to lure investors into ROTHSTEIN'S lair and bilked them of millions of dollars which, in turn, was used to fund the litigation against EPSTEIN for the sole purpose of continuing the massive Ponzi scheme. + +31. As part of this scheme, ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team, individually and in a concerted effort, may have unethically and illegally: + +- a. Sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in nonsettled personal injury lawsuits (which are non-assignable and nontransferable) or sold non-existent structured settlements (including those cases involving Epstein); +- b. Reached agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers; +- c. Used investor money to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; +- d. Conducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conversations in violation of state or federal laws and Bar rules; and ÷ (Utilized the judicial process including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery, for the sole purpose of furthering the Ponzi scheme. + +32. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, + +including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules. + +33. Evidencing that the Litigation Team knew or should have known of the improper purpose that ROTHSTEIN was pursuing in the continuation of the scheme, ROTHSTEIN used RRA's Litigation Team in the EPSTEIN cases to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims pled in the Civil Actions, but significantly beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators. + +34. Upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN and others claimed their investigators discovered that there were high-profile individuals onboard Epstein's private jet where sexual assaults took place and showed O3 (and possibly others) copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries, and international figures. + +35. For instance, the Litigation Team relentlessly and knowingly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights EPSTEIN took with these famous individuals knowing full well that no underage women were onboard and no illicit activities took place. ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a calculated effort to bolster the marketing scam that was taking place. + +36. One of Plaintiffs' counsel, deposed three of EPSTEIN'S pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot (currently serving in Iraq). The pilots were deposed by for over twelve (12) hours, and never asked one question relating to or about E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe (RRA clients) as it related to transportation on flights of RRA clients on any of EPSTEIN'S planes. But asked many inflammatory and leading irrelevant questions about the pilots' thoughts and beliefs (which will never be admissible at trial) which could only have been asked for the purposes of "pumping" the cases and thus by using the depositions to sell the cases (or a part of them) to third parties. + +37. Because of these facts, ROTHSTEIN claimed that Epstein wanted to make certain none of these individuals would be deposed and therefore he had offered \$200,000,000.00 to settle the claims of RRA female clients various potential plaintiffs in actions against EPSTEIN. The offer of a \$200 million dollar settlement by EPSTEIN was completely fabricated; no such offer had ever been made. + +38. office also notified Defendant that he intended to take the depositions of and was subpoenaing: + +- (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); +- (ii) Alan Dershowitz (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); ii' B1Vinton (Former President of the United States); ommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and +- (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). + +39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTEIN with whom he knew through business or philanthropic work over the years. None of the above-named individuals had any connection whatsoever with any of the Litigation Team's clients, E.W., L.M. or Jane Doe. + +40. filed amended answers to interrogatories in the state court matters, E.W. and L.M., and listed additional high profile witnesses that would allegedly be called at trial, including, but not limited to: + +- (i) Bill (Governor of New Mexico, formerly U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United Nations); and +- (ii) Any and all persons having knowledge of EPSTEIN'S charitable, political or other donations;2 + +41. The sole purpose of the scheduling of these d pos ons or listing high profile friends/acquaintances as potential witnesses w i , to "pump" the cases to investors. There is no evidence to date tha ese individuals had or have any knowledge regarding RRA's Civil Action + +42. In furtherance of their illegal and fraudulent scheme against EPSTEIN, ROTHSTEIN, (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: + +- a) Intded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of \$50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the 0 jurisdictional limits. Al b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview without any legitimate legal purpose other than to "pump" the federal case for potential + +2 These high-profile celebrity "purported" witnesses have no personal knowledge regarding the facts on these "Three Cases', but were being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass and intimidate them and Epstein, and to add "star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzi scheme. + +investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. + +- c) , Berger and Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing on the case, but so that the video and questions could be shown to investors. +- d) Conducted and attempted to conduct completely irrelevant discovery unrelated to the claims in or subject matter of the Civil Actions for the purpose of harassing and embarrassing witnesses and EPSTEIN and causing EPSTEIN to spend tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary attorneys' fees and costs defending what appeared to be discovery related to the Civil Actions but was entirely related to the furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. +- e) After was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against A.Sc ii) EPSTEIN used by Attorney and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bite rich such as the July 31, 2009, transcript when stated to the Court in E.W./L.M.: "What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as + +- 1) +- g) As an example, EADS filed an unsupportable and legally deficient Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra . The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaintiff's motion entirely devoid of evidence . . . ", and denied the motion in toto. ROTHSTEIN told investors he had another 52 females that he represented, and that Epstein had offered \$200 million to resolve, + +far as our investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which, I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children. . . and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 peo v to rking underneath him that he is paying well to schedule pointments, to locate these girls." \ lit + +but that he could settle, confidently, these cases for \$500 million, separate and apart from his legal fees. + +- h) ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team knew or should have known that their three (3) filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following reasons: + +- (I) L.M. testified she never had any type of sex with Epstein; worked at numerous strip clubs; is an admitted prostitut an call girl; has a history of illegal drug ainkillers, Xanax, Ecstasy); and continual > asserted the 5th Amendment during her depositions in order to avoid answering relevant but problem questions for her; + +- (ii) E.W. testified she worked at eleven (11) separate strip clubs, including Cheetah which RRA represented and in which ROTHSTEIN may have owned an interest; and E.W. also worked at Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach, which was the subject of a recent police raid where dancers were allegedly selling prescription painkillers and drugs to customers and prostituting themselves. + +- (iii) Jane Doe (federal case) seeks \$50 million from Epstein. She and her attorneys claim severe + +emotional distress as a result of her having voluntarily gone to Epstein's home. She testified that there was never oral, and or sexual intercourse; nor did she ever touch his genitalia. Yet, Jane Doe suffered extreme emotional distress well prior to meeting Epstein as a result of having witnessed her father murder his girlfriend's son. She was required to give sworn testimony in that matter and has admitted that she has lied in sworn testimony. Jane Doe worked at two different strip clubs, including Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach. + +- i) Conducted ridiculous and irrelevant discovery such as subpoenaing records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Bard In Massachusetts, when the alleged police report reflected that EPSTEIN had only seen a chiropractor in Palm Beach named Dr. Bard. No records relating to EPSTEIN existed for this alleged sex therapist, Dr. Bard, and the alleged subpoena for records was just another mechanism to "pump" the cases for investor appeal; Allowed a Second Amended Complaint to be filed on behalf of L.M. alleging that EPSTEIN forced the minor into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engaged in oral, anal, or vaginal + +intercourse with EPSTEIN and she had never touched his genitalia. + +- k) Told investors, as reported in an Associated Press article, that celebrities and other famous people had flown on Ea plane when assaults took place. Therefore, even though none (zero) of RRA's clients claim they flew of EPSTEIN'S planes, the Litigation Team sought pilot and plane logs. Why? Again, to prime the investment "pump" with new money without any relevance to the existing claims made by the RRA clients. +- I) After joined RRA, and former Circuit Judge William Berger filed and argued motion to make the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and USAO public. But, RRA, and Berger, and their three clients, already had a copy of the NPA. They knew what it said and they knew the civil provisions in the agreement had no impact whatsoever on the three pending Civil Actions. + +The concept behind certain civil provisions in the NPA was to allow an alleged victim to resolve a civil claim with Epstein, maintain her complete privacy and anonymity and move on with her life. As an assistant United States Attorney stated at a hearing in federal court, the NPA was not designed "to hand them a jackpot or a key to a bank." + +43. ROTHSTEIN, with the intent and improper motive to magnify his financial gain so continue to fund the fraudulent and illegal investment and/or Ponzi scheme, had demand excessive money from EPSTEIN in the Civil Actions. + +44. The actions described in paragraph 42 above herein had no legitimate purpose in pursuing the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN, but rather were meant to further the fraudulent scheme and criminal activity of ROTHSTEIN so that he and others could fraudulently overvalue the settlement value of the existing and non-existent claims against EPSTEIN to potential investors. "c li + +45. As a result of the fraudulent investme \ t Vzi) scheme, RRA and its attorneys in the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN m y have compromised their clients' interests. ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team would have been unable to give unbiased legal counsel because outside investor(s) had been promised a financial interest in the outcome of the actions. Additionally, if a plaintiff received payments from investment monies while her action is pending, this clearly could impact the plaintiffs decision of whether or not to settle the current litigation or shade their testimony (i.e. commit perjury) to gain the greatest return on the investment and to further promote the Ponzi Scheme. + +46. The truthfulness of L.M.'s allegations and testimony in L.M.'s state civil action have been severely compromised by the need to seek a multi-million dollar payout to help maintain RRA's massive fraud. Because fictitious settlements of tens of millions of dollars in cases relating to EPSTEIN were represented to "investors" in this Ponzi scheme, RRA and the attorneys in the Civil Actions needed to create a fiction that + +included extraordinary damages. However, the actual facts behind her action would never support such extraordinary damages. Therefore, extraordinary measures were undertaken to create an entirely inflated value of her claims against EPSTEIN. + +a. Though she held herself out as a "victim" of Epstein, she admitted to having returned over and over again to him despite her current claim of abuse. She has now admitted, under oath, to being a call girl/escort since the age of 15. (in her deposition September 24, 2009 Transcript "DT" 280:16-19). She testified "Well, I lived life as a prostitute," (see DT 156:7) and "I am a prostitute when I make money" (see DT 156:12-13). L.M. admitted her activity with men other than Epstein to making \$1,000 a day from prostitution on maybe more than 20 occasions in one year alone (DT 157:11-158:21). L.M. admitted under oath to keeping a list of amounts she collected from "Johns" in "two or three" lined books including a book of "Psalms" that she obtained from a religious store (DT 152:1-14). Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against EPSTEIN, one of L.M.'s many "Johns" during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to "RBA's investors." + +47. In April 2007, before she was represented by and RRA, L.M. gave sworn taped recorded testimony to the agents of the FBI. She was represented by a lawyer other than at that statement. She spoke of EPSTEIN in a very positive and friendly terms and directly contradicted the central allegations on which L.M.'s civil action against Epstein is now based. However, once in the hands of + +and RRA, L.M.'s story changed dramatically. All of a sudden she wanted to sue EPSTEIN and like other RRA clients, sought tens of millions of dollars. + +- a. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, L.M. was insistent that "Jeffrey is an awesome man." (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it really would be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an awesome guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing." (pp. 57-58 - FBI). In fact, L.M. spoke so highly of EPSTEIN and her interactions with him that the US Attorney's office informed a federal court in July 2008 that the US Attorney could not consider L.M. a victim. + +Yet, by September 24, 2009, the date on which L.M. began her deposition in her civil action and now represented by RRA and , L.M.'s new and very different tale about purported sexual misconduct under the supposed influence of EPSTEIN had been thoroughly rehearsed and her role into the ROTHSTEIN scam was complete. In her deposition in her civil action, L.M. declared that: + +"I, I don't really care about money." (DT 206:8) + +"He needs time in jail. He doesn't want to be — this is not right for him to be on the streets living daily . . ." (DT 219:21-23) + +"You don't think my whole life I have lived that shifty life because of Jeffrey Epstein?" (DT 222:7-8) + +b. In her sworn FBI testimony (pre and RRA), L.M. was emphatic that her interactions with Epstein involved no inappropriate sexual touching in any way. In fact, it was exactly the opposite: + +Q: Did he at any point kiss you, touch you, show any kind of affection towards you? CIL) + +A: Never, never. (p. 21 — FBI) . + +Q: So he never pulled you clo\$cJih in a sexual way? + +A: I wish. No, no, ne , ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. I) + +after Yet, L.M. filed her second amended complaint in April 2009, joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN in mplaint became even more salacious. In paragraph 12 of L.M.'s Second Amended Complaint, L.M. alleges among other things, that: + +"Jeffrey Epstein coerced, induced, or enticed . . .the then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexual misconduct. These acts included, but were not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and illegal sexual touching of the then minor Plaintiff, forcing or inducing the then minor plaintiff into oral sex or other sexual misconduct..." + +- c. In her sworn FBI statement (pre- and RRA), L.M. testified that the individual who first brought L.M. to EPSTEIN's home, told L.M. "make sure you're 18 because Jeffrey doesn't want any underage girls." (p. 8 - FBI). + +Yet at her September, 2009 deposition now represented by and RRA, L.M. told a very different spry: + +- d. Pre and RRA, L.M. testified to the FBI : "I always made sure — I had a fake ID, anyways saying that I was 18." (p. 8 - FBI). + +Q: My question was what did Car lyn II you to tell Mr. Epstein about your age? + +4\ 14 12 + +A: She said it didn't matt + +Q: That's your recollectior\tabout what she said? + +A: Yes, she said - I remember her saying it doesn't matter. Don't worry about it. + +(DT 199:20-25) + +stated: Yet, when questioned about her fake ID at her September 2009 depo, she + +Q: And did you have a fake ID? + +A: No. + +Q: Have you ever had a fake ID? + +A: No. + +(DT 300:5-8) + +e. In her FBI statement (pre-- and RRA), L.M. testified about others L.M. brought to the Epstein home. L.M. testified that women she brought to EPSTEIN's home were eager for the opportunity and content with their experiences: + +> A: None of my girls ever had a problem and they'd call me. They'd beg me, you know, for us to go to Jeffrey's house because they love Jeffrey. Jeffrey is a respect4ul man. He really is. I mean, and he all thought we were of age always. This is what's so sad about it. (p 30 - FBI). + +O: Did any of the girls complain about what happened after they left there? + +A: P . You asked me that question. No, everybody loved Jeffrey. (Sp. 44 - FBI) + +AkS + +A: Every girl that I brought to Jeffrey, they said they were fine with it. and like for example (E.W. — another of RRA's clients in the Civil Actions], a lot of girls begged me to bring them back for the money. And as far as I know, we all had fun there. (p. 45 - FBI) + +Yet, with and RRA as her attorneys, L.M. did a "180" at her September, 2009 deposition in saying: + +> A: . . . Once they were there, they were scared out of their mind. They did it anyways and some of them walked out and said L.M. don't ever do this to me again. That was the worst thing that ever happened to me. (DT 170:6-11) + +. . . A: And then, a lot of girls weren't comfortable. (DT 171:13) + +f. The above represent only a few of the dramatic changes L.M. made in her testimony prior to her representation by EDWARDS/RRA and after she hired ROTHSTEIN, and RRA. + +48. As a result of the fraudulent investment or (Ponzi) scheme, L.M. may knowingly have compromised her alleged interests in her Civil Action, or committed a fraud on the court. + +49. RRA and the Litigation Team took an emotionally driven set of facts involving alleged innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach Billionaire and sought to tum it into a gold mine. Rather than evaluating and resolving the cases based on the merits (i.e. facts) which included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by each of the claimants and substantial pre-Epstein psychological and emotional conditions of each of the claimants and substantial sexual experiences pre-Epstein, RRA and the Litigation Team sought through protective orders and objections to block relevant discovery regarding their claimants. They instead forged ahead with discovery the main purpose of which was to pressure Epstein into settling the cases. + +Fortunately, their tactics have not been successful. As Magistrate Judge Linnea wrote in a discovery order dated September 15, 2009 (DE 299 in Federal Case #08-80119) in denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order: + +"This is his [Epstein's] right. The Record in this case is clear that the childhood of many of the Plaintiffs was marred by instances of abuse and neglect, which in turn may have resulted, in whole or in part, in the damages claimed by the Plaintiffs." C + +In addition, in an Omnibus Order dated October 28, 2 009 (DE 377 in Federal Case #08-80119) Magistrate Judge Linnea Johnson wrote: + +"Here the request at issue goes to the very heart of the Plaintiff's damage claims, requesting not only general information relating to Plaintiffs sexual history, but inquiring as to specific instances wherein Plaintiff received compensation or consideration for sex acts, claim other males sexually assaulted, battered, or abuses her, and/or claim other males committed lewd or lascivious acts on her. As a global matter, Plaintiffs clearly and unequivocally place their sexual history in issue by their allegations that Epstein's actions in this case has negatively affected their relationships by, among other things, "distrust in men," "sexual intimacy problems," "diminished trust," "social problems," " problems in personal relationships," " feeling of stress around men," "premature teenage pregnancy," "antisocial behaviors," and "hyper-sexuality and promiscuity." Considering these allegation, there simply can be no question that Epstein is entitled to know whether Plaintiffs were molested or the subject of other "sexual activity" or "lewd + +and lascivious conduct" in order to determine whether there is an alternative basis for the psychological disorders Plaintiffs claim to have sustained, whether Plaintiffs engaged in prostitution or other similar type acts and how certain acts alleged in the Complaint materially affected Plaintiffs' relationships with others or how those acts did not have such an affect on those relationships and/or whether Plaintiffs suffered from the alleged emotional and psychological disorders as a result of other sexual acts prior to the acts alleged in the Complaint. To deny Epstein thus discovery, would be tantamount ttq ) baf 'ng him from mounting a defense." + +50. ROTHSTEIN, and L.M.'s di\c10 + +61ALTLIA 18 U.S.C. § 1 962(d) 18 U.S.C. §I 956(h) 18 U.S.C. §I349 18 U.S.C. §1343 18 U.S.C. § 2 18 U.S.C. §1963 18 U.S.C. §982(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. §981(a)(I)(C) + +#### RMATI N + +FILED by D.C. DEC 0 1 2009: STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U. S. DIST. CT. S. D. of FLA. - FT. LAUD. + +The United States AtI6Zy lfges that, at all times relevant to this Information: + +### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +I. S n W. 'fl h of stein was an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. + +Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and elsewhere. The law firm employed approximately seventy (70) attorneys and engaged in the practice of law involving a wide range of specialties, including labor and employment law. + +EXHIBIT 2 + +### COUNT 1 + +(Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §I962(d)) + +- 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. + +### THE ENTERPRISE + +- 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. (hereinafter refertedlo as RRA) '8 was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and cons( Van Enterprise as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(4).C and the activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce. rise engaged in, + +### THE RACKETEERING CO SP + +- 3. From in or about 2005 and continuing n or about November 2009, in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +being a person employed by and associated with the Enterprise described above, which was engaged in, and the activities of which affectedlinterstate and foreign commerce, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree, with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to violate Title 1 , rated States Code, Section 1962(c); that is, to conduct and participate, directly and indirect , the onduct of the affairs of the Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity as that tee fined in Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961(1) and (5), as set forth herein below at paragraph 4. + +### THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY + +4. The pattern of racketeering activity as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961(1) and 1961(5), through which the defendant and his co-conspirators agreed to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the Enterprise consisted of multiple acts indictable under the laws of the United States, namely: + +- i. farel"!, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341 (mail fraud)j,.i% - +- ii. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (wire Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a ),(1 of monetary instruments); +- iv. Title 18, United States Code, ct 57 (engaging in monetary transactions); and +- v. Title 18, United States CaCle, tion I956(h) (conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and engage in monetary transactions. + +## THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE RACKETEERING ACTIVITY + +5. The principal purpose of the racketeering conspiracy was to generate money for the defendant and his co-conspirators tivough the operation of the Enterprise and through various criminal activities, including mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. + +6. The defendant and his co-conspirators agreed to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through its base of operation at the offices of RRA. The conspirators also utilized other locations to further the objectives of the Enterprise. RRA was utilized by the defendant and his coconspirators to unlawfully obtain approximately \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud in connection with an investment scheme commonly known as a "Ponzi" scheme, in which new investors' funds + +are utilized to pay previous investors in the absence of any underlying security, legitimate investment vehicle or other commodity. + +### THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS + +### 7. The roles of the conspirators were as follows: + +### A. Defendant SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN was a shareholder, Chairman and CFO of RRA. + +Through his position at RRA, defendant ROTHSTEIN promoted, managed, ant,suAvised the administration of the Enterprise by fraudulently inducing investors through', t use of false statements, documents, and computer records to (1 ) loan money to purported borrowers borrowers based upon fraudulent promissory notes and fictitious bridge loans, and (2 my funds based upon anticipated pay-outs from purported confidential settlement agree had been reached between and among certain individuals and business entities. 17d sett ent agreements were falsely presented as having been reached between putative plaintiffs in civil cases and putative defendants based upon the forbearance of civil claims in sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower cases. + +# B. Other conspirators, known and unknown to the United States Attorney, agreed with + +one another and with defendant ROTHSTEIN to take actions to further the operation and success of the "Ponzi" scheme, including presenting the aforesaid investments to potential investors as legitimate inve4tt tt vehicles, when in fact they were not; fraudulently inducing investors to place funds in o tvestment vehicles by making material misstatements of facts as set forth below; assure gtt ential investors and investors that sufficient funds existed to pay returns on these investments, when in fact such funds did not exist; creating, and transferring funds into and from, various accounts at financial institutions in order to further the unlawful scheme; and realizing + +profits from the operation of the Ponzi scheme through the acquisition of money generated as proceeds from the scheme and through the acquisition of real and personal property. + +### MANNER AND MEANS OF THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY + +8. It was part of the conspiracy that the defendant agreed that a conspirator would commit at least two acts of racketeering activity in the conduct of the affairs of the Enterprise. + +9. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators initiated the criminal conduct alleged in the instant Information in order to personally enrich themselvesarwlo l . pplement the income and sustain the daily operation of RRA. G + +10. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspiratolnliaudulently solicited investors to loan money based upon promissory notes and bridge loans to and from purported clients of RRA. Defendant ROTHSTEIN falsely alleged that clients of RRA requested short-term financing for undisclosed business deals. Defendant ROTHSTEIN falsely alleged that the purported clients were willing to pay high rates of return on loans negotiated by Defendant ROTHSTEIN. In fact, defendant ROTHSTEIN was aware that no such clients or requests for business financing actually existed. + +II. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators participated in an investment scheme commonly knownas a "Ponzi" scheme. The "Ponzi" scheme involved the sale of purported confidential settlement agreements in sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower cases. The potential investors were told by defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators that confidential settlement agreements were available for purchase. The purported settlements were allegedly available in amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars and could be purchased at a discount and repaid to the investors at face value over time. + +12. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized the offices of RRA and the offices of other co-conspirators to convince potential investors of the legitimacy and success of the law firm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity. + +13. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made false and misleading statements and omissions which were intended to fraudulently induce potential investors into purchasing the confidential settlements. + +14. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made the following fraudulent representations to potential investors in order to induce them to purchase the purported settlements: + +- A. That the purported settlements were highly confidential in order to protect the reputation of the company authonzing the settlement and the executives involved; +- B. That the plaintiffs in the purportcd sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower cases preferred to settle the cases in order to avoid the emotional embarrassment of pursuing a claim in a public forum; That RRA originated its own cases from reputation, internal staff and outside referrals from other law firms; That RRA retained a company that owned Internet sites and well-placed "800" numbers designed to attract cases; 4'2 That RRA rigorously screened the purported sexual harassment and/or a large volume of high quality whistle-blower settlement agreements; + +- F. That RRA utilized former law enforcement personnel and employed highly sophisticated investigative methods in selecting and pursuing claims against purported defendants; +- G. That RRA or other law firms pursued purported settlements with defendant companies prior to the initiation of litigation; +- H. That RRA or other law firms negotiated with the tied defendant company after such company was made aware of claim by the plaintiff; + - C) +- I. That RRA or other law firms purpo,jedl egotiated with the defendant company and reached an agree k contained the settlement amount and the payment terms; +- J. That because the puSrporte ,se lements occurred prior to the initiation of litigation, there was no court or governmental entity involved in the transaction; +- K. That the alleged defendant companies sent by wire transfer to RRA or other ' trust accounts the full proceeds of the purported settlements; That during the settlement conference or other settlement negotiations when O a purported plaintiff protested the extended payment schedule, RRA or other law firms presented the purported plaintiff with the option of receiving a discounted lump sum payment from an unrelated confidential funding source; + - M. That RRA or other co-conspirators prepared a purported Assignment of Settlement Agreement in which the investor agreed to acquire the right to the + +purported settlement payments for a discounted lump sum payment made to the purported plaintiff; + +- N. That when RRA received the payment by the investor it immediately disbursed those funds to the purported plaintiff; and +- O. That RRA made payment to the investor pursuant to the purported payment schedule set forth in the purported settlement agreement. + +15. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely informed potential investors that funds were maintained in designated trust accounts for the benefit of the individual investor and that these funds were verified on a regular basis, weekly if not more often, by two independent verification sources, one being an attorney and the other being an independent financial advisor (hereinafter referred to "independent verifiers"). + +16. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely informed potential investors that RRA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. + +17. Defendant/ ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely informed potential investors that e ligence would be undertaken with the following provisions: + +- An "independent verifier" would be permitted to ask questions of Defendant ROTHSTEIN and/or other co-conspirators to review the opportunity and structure; +- B. The "independent verifier" would have the opportunity to randomly review selected completed transactions to confirm the veracity of the information; + +- C. The "independent verifier" had already reviewed current transactions, including wire transfers received from defendants and payments made to plaintiffs; +- D. The "independent verifier" would have the opportunity to visit and speak with a senior banking officer at the local branch of the financial institution to confirm current trust account bank balances through bank statements provided on line; and +- E. The "independent verifier" had the opportuni o me t with a senior banking officer to verify that the trust acco "locked" and to verify the strength of RRA's financial pos ationship with the bank. + +18. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and o spirators established numerous trust accounts in the name of RRA in order to co ential and current investors of the legitimacy of the confidential settlement agreemts nd the security of such investments. + +\_ 19. Defendant ROTHMH"nd other co-conspirators prepared and used altered bank statements, purportedly issued from a well-established international financial institution, to fraudulently convince potential and current investors that funds had been received from the purported defendant companies and were maintained in trust accounts. + +20. in order to deceive investors, defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created, altered and/or maintained fictitious online banking information regarding the purported trust accounts which falsely reflected the amount of funds maintained in such accounts, the receipt of funds wired from the alleged defendant companies and the transmission of funds by wire to the alleged plaintiffs, + +21. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements, assignment of settlement agreements and proceeds, sale and transfer agreements, and personal guaranties by Defendant ROTHSTEIN, among other documents. + +22. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators facilitated the movement and transfer of funds between and among numerous trust accounts and operating, unts1' order to perpetuate the scheme. The movement and transfer of such funds insured t at m i were available in the individual trust accounts in order to make scheduled payment to in estors. + +23. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspi ors ade false statements to current investors in order to convince them to re-invest in urported confidential settlement agreements. + +24. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other&I-c onspirators facilitated the creation of false and fictitious "lock letters" which were issued by an executive at the financial institution where the trust and operating accounts were maintained. Such "lock letters" falsely reflected that the funds maintained in specific trust accounts would only be disbursed to specific investors. + +25. Defend THSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds received from investors to p4, romised "return on investment" to earlier investors. + +efendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators also initiated and conducted a scheritq to efraud clients of RRA in order to perpetuate the "Ponzi" scheme. Such clients had retained RRA to institute and file a civil lawsuit. Unknown to the clients, RRA settled the lawsuit and obligated the clients to pay \$500,000 to the defendant. In order to commit the fraud and deceive the clients, defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created a false and fraudulent court + +order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately \$23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. + +27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that in order to recover the defendant's funds, they had to post bonds to be held in the RRA trust account. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators fraudulently caused the clients to wire transfer approximately \$57 million over several yeas toatrust account controlled by defendant ROTHSTEIN, purportedly to satisfy the bond + +28. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other c t caused the funds transmitted by the clients to be transferred to other RRA trust a i rder to perpetuate the "Ponzi" scheme and to enrich those co-conspirators who w ted with the Enterprise. + +29. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators were questioned by the clients as to the progress of the alleged lawsuit. In order to delay the return of funds to the clients, defendant ROTHSTEIN fraudulently created a false Federal court order purportedly issued by a United States 11 Magistrate Judge alleg Y..brdering RRA to return the transmitted funds by a later date. + +30. m ndant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the "Po' e to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by tiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salaries and bonuses, and to acquire larger and more elaborate office space and equipment in order to enrich the personal wealth of persons employed by and associated with the Enterprise. + +31. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds illegally obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme to make political contributions to local, state and federal political candidates, in a manner designed to conceal the true source of such funds and to circumvent state and federal laws governing the limitations and contribution of such funds. + +32. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators used other corporations in order to launder proceeds generated from the "Ponzi" scheme to conceal the source c 2--111l fu s utilized to make political contributions in order to promote the "Ponzi" scheme. + +33. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators pad largf bonuses to employees of RRA purportedly as an award for exemplary work. P employees were instructed to make large contributio names. Such conduct was designed to conceal the true e receipt of the bonuses, the al candidates in the employees' ce of the contribution and to illegally circumvent campaign finance laws. + +34. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators distributed lavish gifts including exotic cars, jewelry, boats, loans, cash and bonuses to individuals and members of RRA in order to engender goodwill and loyalty and.to create the appearance of a successful law firm. + +35. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made large charitable contributions t6 lic and private charitable institutions, including hospitals and other legitimate charitable d n profit organizations using funds derived from the "Ponzi" scheme. + +36. - Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds illegally obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme to hire members of local police departments purportedly to provide security for RRA and defendant ROTHSTEIN's personal residence. "Ponzi" scheme funds were also used to provide gratuities to high ranking members of police agencies in order to curry favor + +with such police personnel and to deflect law enforcement scrutiny of the activities of RRA and defendant ROTHSTEIN. + +37. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme in order to purchase controlling interests in restaurants located in the Southern District of Florida. Such restaurants were used in part as a mechanism to give gratuities to individuals, including politicians, business associates and attorneys, in order to go will and loyalty, as a location to solicit potential investors and as a secure location for 7a rial ' meetings. + +38. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators dated with affluent and politically connected individuals in order to lure wealthy investors o the "Ponzi" scheme. + +39. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and otherco-conspirators associated with well known sports figures and politicians, in public forums and elsewhere, in, order to gain greater notoriety and to create the appearance of wealth and legitimacy. Such acts were calculated in part to enhance defendant ROTHSTEIN's ability to solicitpotential investors in the "Ponzi" scheme. + +N 40. Defendant ROT d other co-conspirators used funds derived from the "Ponzi" scheme to maintain thbjpgdarance of affluence and wealth, by purchasing expensive real and personal property, into convince potential investors of the legitimacy of RRA and of the purported inve opportunities. Defendant ROTHSTEIN purchased expensive real property, personal r business interests, vessels, vehicles and other indicia of success and wealth. + +in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d). + +#### COUNT 2 + +(Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) + +1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count I of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. + +2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter referred to as TD Bank) was a commercial bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida., executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry M, N . Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) b ceo is at TD Bank, which were utilized during the course of the "Ponzi" scheme. + +3. Gibraltar Private Bank and Trust (hereinafter referred to as Gibraltar Bank) was a commercial bank with seven (7) branch offices, including;a branch office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ftRA maintained at least four (4) bank accounts at Gibraltar Bank, which were utilized during the course of the "Ponzi" scheme. + +4. From in or about 2 S'an ninuing thereafter through in or about November 2009, in Broward County, in the So 'ct of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +did knowingly co1rspire, nfederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States AttonteNto c&mmit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States 1 Code, Sections-1956 and 1957, that is: + +i. to knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate and foreign commerce, which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, that is, mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, with the intent to promote the carrying on of said specified unlawful activities, and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transactions knew that the property involved in the financial + +transaction represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i); + +ii. to knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate commerce and foreign commerce, which transactions involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, that is, mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, knowing that the transactions were designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transactions, knew that the property involved in the financial transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, in violation of Title 18 Olt States Code, Section I 956(a)(1)(B)(i); and + +iii. to knowingly engage and attempt to engage, in mo etary transactions by, through or to a financial institution, affecting interstate and reigii commerce, in criminally derived property of a value greater than \$10,000, which property having been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is, mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. + +All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section I 956(h). + +# COUNT 3 + +(Mail and Wire Fraud Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1349) / + +- I +- I. The General AllegatiOns and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporatetTherein by reference. +- 2. From in ut 2005 and continuing thereafter through in or about November 2009, in Broward C in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, did SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, ly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with other persons known and unknown to the United States Attomey to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, that is: + +i. to knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing that they were false and fraudulent when made, and causing to be delivered certain mail matter by any private and commercial interstate carrier, according to the directions thereon, for the purpose of executing the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341 + +ii. to knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing that they were false and fraudulent when made, and transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce, certain signs, signals and sounds, for the purpose of executing the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. + +### THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF TH&CONSPIRACY + +3. The purpose and object of the conspirac ich defendant ROTHSTEIN and his co-conspirators by illegally obtaining money froth inv rs and converting the investors' money to their own use and benefit through the operation of the above-described "Ponzi" scheme. + +All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349. + +### COUNTS 4 and 5 + +(Wire/Fraud, 18 U.S.C. §1343) + +I. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count I of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. + +2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +did knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, + +representations, and promises, knowing that such pretenses, representations, and promises were false and fraudulent when made, and for the purpose of executing the scheme, transmitted and caused to be transmitted certain wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce, as more particularly described below: + +| COUNT | DATE | WIRE COMMUNICATION | | | +|-------|------------------|-----------------------------------|---|----| +| 4 | December 2, 2008 | Interstate wire transfer sent fro | B | to | +| 5 | October 16, 2009 | Interstate wire transfer sen | | | + +All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2. + +# FORFEITURE A EQATIONS + +1. The allegations of this Info e realleged and by this reference fully incorporated herein for the purpose of Aalle c 'n e enures to the United States of America of certain property in which the defendant an terest pursuant to 7(c)(2) and 32.2(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Forfeits is be sought pursuant to the provisions of Title IS, United States Code, Sections 1963(4\_982(a) and 981(a)( I )(C), as made applicable hereto by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461. + +- Upon conviction of the offense of RICO Conspiracy set forth in Count I of the Information, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States the following property: + +- i. Any interest acquired or maintained pursuant to Section 1962; +- ii. Any interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual rights of any kind affording a source of influence over, the + +enterprise described in the Information which was established, operated, controlled and conducted pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962; and + +iii. Any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly and indirectly from racketeering activity pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962. + +3. Upon conviction of the offense of Money Laundering Conspiracy set forth in Count 2 of the Information, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States all property, real or personal, involved in or traceable to the offense which property shall include: + +- i. all money and other property that was the subject of each +- / transaction, transportation, transmission and transfer in violation of Section 1956(h); +- ii. all commissions, fees and other property constituting proceeds obtained as a result of those violations; and +- iii. all property used in any manner and part to commit and to facilitate the commission of those violations. + +4. Upon conviction of the offense of Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud and to Commit Wire Fraud as set forth in Counts 3, 4, and 5 of the Information, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States, all property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offense. + +5. The property subject to forfeiture, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1963, 982(a)(1) and 981(a)(1)(C), includes but is not limited to: + +- A. A sum of money equal to \$1,200,000,000 in United States currency. + +# B. Real Properties ("RP"): + +- (RP I ) 2307 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP I ," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0210; (RP2) 2308 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred w as "Defendant RP2," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures,' attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 4 with a Folo i Number of 5042 12 13 0020; +- (RP3) 2316 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP3," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 8 Lot 3 & Lot 4 W V2 Blk 4 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0030; (RP4) 30 Isla B: ve, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements d therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 63 with a Folio Number of 5042 13 16 0640; (RP5) 29 Isla Bahia Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RPS," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements + +found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 35 with a Folio Number of 5042 13 16 0360; + +(RP6) 350 SE 2nd Street, Unit 2840, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP6," includes that portion of the condominium, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: 350 Las Olas Place Condo Unit 2840 with a Folio Number of 5042 10 AN 1490; + +(RP8) 2133 Imperial Point Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP8," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Imperial Point 1 Sec 53-44 B Lot II BIk 22 with a Folio Number of 4942 12 07 2020; + +(RP9) 2627 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP9," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; + +(RP10)10630 NW,I4'h Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as fr "Defendant RP10," includes that portion of the condominium/townhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: OPTIMA VILLAGE 1-"C" CONDO UNIT 201 BLDG 2 with a Folio Number of 4941 31 AC 0110; + +(RN 1) 227 Garden Court, Lauderdale by the Sea, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP11," includes that portion of the buildings, improvements, fixtures, + +attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: SILVER SHORES UNIT A 28-39 B POR of Lot 4, BLK 5 DESC AS TO BEG AT SE COR SAID LOT 4, N 79.37 W 37.75, S 79.37, E 35.75 TO POB AKA: UNIT E MARINA VILLAGE TOWNHOMES 227GARDEN with a Folio Number of 4943 18 24 0050; S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.92, N 7.66, W 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO POB AKA: BAY 1 PORTSIDE with a Folio Number of 5042 23 28 0010; as "Defendant RPI3," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: BEVERLY HEIGHTS 1-30 B LOT I W 100, LOT 2 W 100 BLK 17 with a Folio Number of 5042 11 07 0540; easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: 31-48-43 S IS0 OD FOL DESC, BEG INTER E R/W/L ST RD 5, N TO ROB with a Folio Number of 4843 31 00 0401; 21 + +(RP12) 708 Spangler Boulevard, Bay I, Hollywood, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP12," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: HARBOR VIEW 10-5 B PORTION OF LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 2 DESC AS COMM 25 S OF NE COR OF LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG VELMA- OF ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, + +(RP13) 1012 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to + +(RPI4) 950 N Federal Highway, Fors Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as \_ "Defendant RP 14," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and (RP15) 350 Las Olas Boulevard, Commercial Unit 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP15," includes all portion of that condominium, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: 350 LAS OLAS PLACE COMM CONDO UNIT CU2 with a Folio Number of 5042 10 AP 0020; + +(RP16) 361 SE 9 Lane, Boca Raton, Florida hereafter also referred to as" Ag endant RPI6," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachment therein or thereon; ments found + +(RP17) 1198 N Old Dixie Highway, Boca Raton, F n ereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP17," includes all buildings ents, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon; + +(RP18) 1299 N Federal Highway, BARat n, Florida hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP18," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon; + +(RP19) 15I East 58 Street, Apartment 42D, New York, New York hereafter also referred to as "Defendant FtP19," includes all portion of that condominium, improvements, es, attachments and easements found therein or thereon; + +Bluff ■ **Cove Farm, Narragansett, Rhode Island hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP20," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon;** + +(RP21) 15 Bluff ■ **Cove Farm, Narragansett, Rhode Island hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP21," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon;** + +**(RP22) 353 4 Ave., Unit 12-H, Brooklyn, NY hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP22," includes all portion of that condominium, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon;** + +**(RP23) 290W 1 I th St # IC, NY, NY hereafter also referred to as "D Ven NP23," includes ("A' all portion of that condominium, improvements, fixturns, attachments and easements • \_,,/ found therein or thereon; and** + +**(RP24) Versace Mansion/Casa Casuarina-10% "Defendant RP24," includes all bu easements found therein or flat hereafter also referred to as provements, fixtures, attachments and** + +# **C. Vehicles and Vessels ("VV"):** + +**(VV I) 1990 Red Ferrari F40 Coupe, VIN: ZFFMN34A5L0087066;** + +**(VV2) 2009 Convertible, VIN: SCBDR33W29C059672;** + +**(VV3) 2008 Yellow McLaren Mercedes Benz SLR, VIN: WDDAK76F98M001788;** + +**(VV4) 2007 Black Limousine E Expedition, VIN: I F I FK I 5557LA59223;** + +**(VV5) 2009 Red Ferrari 430 Spider, VIN: ZFFEW59A3801 63011;** + +**(VV6) 2007 Silver Rolls Royce Convertible, VW: SCA I L68557UX23044;** + +**(VV7) 2006 Silver Hummer HI, 137PH84396E220665;** + +**(VV8) 2008 Cadillac Escalade, VIN: 1GYEC63858R234458;** + +**(VV9) 1967 Red Convertible Corvette, VIN: 1946775104745;** + +- (75) (T I) 304 pieces of jewelry, watch necltlaces and earrings seized on or about Monday, November 9, 2009 fro idence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; (T2) 16 DuPont Lighte scLied on or about Monday, November 9, 2009 from the residence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; (T3) 3 pieces memorabilia seized on or about Monday, November 9, 2009 from the once of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; 71,160 in United States currency seized on or about Monday, November 9, 2009 from the residence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; \$1,500 in United States currency, seized on about Wednesday, November 4, 2009, from the office of Scott W. Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A.; + +(VV I 0) 2009 Black Bugatti Veyron EB 16.4, VIN: VF9SA25C28M795153; + +(VV I 1)2008 Blue Rolls Royce Drophead Convertible, VIN: SCA2D68528UX1607l; + +(VV I7) 2007 87' = Hull # WAR87777B707; + +(VV (8) 33' Aquariva, Hull # XFA33R74G405; + +(VV19) 2009 11' Yamaha Jet Ski, Hull II YAMA36611809; + +(VV20) 2009 11' Yamaha VS, Hull N YAMA36261809; + +(VV2I ) 2009 11' Yamaha VS, Hull 4YAMA2679G809; + +(VV22) 1999 55' Sea Ray 540 Sundancer, SERY001899; + +CL) (VV23) 2009 Yamaha Jet Ski, Hull # YAMA4288K 9; + +(VV 24) 2010 Lamborghini 1p-670sv, V 8AHXALA03837. + +# D. Tangibles ("T") + +(T6) \$30,000 in American Express Gift Cards to the attention of Scott Rothstein, obtained from UPS on or about November 12, 2009; (T7) \$50,000 in American Express Gift Cards to the attention of Scott Rothstein, obtained from UPS on or about November 13, 2009; (T8) 5 additional watches being voluntarily turned over to the United States; and (T9) Guitar collection of Scott W. Rothstein, located at the residence of Scott and Kimberley Rothstein, valued between \$10,000 and \$20,000.( + +### E. Bank Accounts ("BA") + +(BA]) Fidelity Investments Account, in the n approximately \$1,263,780; (BA2) Gibraltar Bank account 50010085, inaap ximate amount of \$484,900.68; (BA3) Gibraltar Bank accountMIES in the approximate amount of \$53,448.51; n W. Rothstein, valued at (BA4) Gibraltar Bank account in the approximate amount of \$71,793.06; (BA5) Gibraltar Bank accoun' in the approximate amount of \$995,521.42; (BA6) Bank account 178780211819923220000187 at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Scott Rothstein, in the approximate amount of \$12,000,000; (BA7) Bank account at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Ahnick Khalid, up to the amount of \$2,000,000; (BA8)-Bank account at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Steve Caputi, up to the amount of \$1,000,000; + +(BA9) Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860291266 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A. which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$54,021.27; + +(BAIO)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6861011556 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$10,085.00; + +(BA I 1)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November II, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$720,892.08; + +(BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 686422200 in the name of DJB Financial Holding, which, on or about November 11,2009, contained the approximate amount of 564,970.00; + +(BA13)Toronto Dominion Bancita,count 6860755757 the name of RRA Sports and Entertainment LLC, which, on or about November II, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$10,490.10; + +(BA14)Toronto ion Bank, N.A. account 6860755781 in the name of RRA Goal Line ement, LLC, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the A45Oroximate amount of \$25,216.27; + +)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6861077714 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$20,080.00. + +# F. Business Interests ("BI") + +- (811) certificates, if issued, or the beneficial interest in such shares, of 50,000 shares of capital , in Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust, a federally chartered savings association, purchased in or about September 2009 by GBPT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its manager, Bahia Property Management, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; (BI2) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; +- (813) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (BI4) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; +- (815) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucipa; (B16) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova;Prime; (BI7) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Café Iguana, Pembroke Pines, Florida; (B18) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Cart Shield USA, LLC; (B19) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Renato Watches; (BI10) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Edify LLC; (Bit I) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in V Georgio Vodka; (BI12) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Sea Club; (BI13) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in North Star Mortgage; (BI14) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Kip Hunter Marketing; (BI 15) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Sports and Entertainment, LLC; (BI16) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Versace Mansion/Casa Casuarina, including 10 year Operating Agreement with 2 ten year options; + +(B117) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest, and licensing rights, in Alternative Biofuel Company; + +(B! I8) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Goal Line Management; + +(B119) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Iron Street Management, LLC; + +(B120) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and loan to, Africat Equity 1G Decide; + +(BI21) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived from 11 8-7,pixiel-LC; + +(3122) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived froth O9,9 Federal LLC; + +(B123) Promissory Note by Uniglobe in favor of Scott W. Rote and + +(8124) All equity interest held by or on behalf of Sc othstein, in the following corporations and entities: + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. 29 Bahia LLC; 235 GC LLC; 350 LOP#2840 353 BR L 10630 # 70tangler LLC; 1012 Broward LLC; 1198 Dixic LLC; 1299 Federal LLC; +- j. 2133 IP LLC; +- k. 15158 LLC; +- I. AANG LLC; + ++1. + +- m. AAMGI LLC; +- n. AAMM Holdings; +- o. ABT Investments LLC; +- p. Advanced Solutions; +- q. Bahia Property Management LLC; +- r. Boat Management LLC; +- s. BOSM Holdings LLC; +- t. BOVA Prime LLC; +- u. BOVA Restaurant Group LLC; +- v. The BOVA Group LLC; +- w. BOVA Smoke LLC; +- x. BOVCU LLC; +- y. BOVR1LLC; +- 2. Broward Financial Holdings, Inc.; aa. CI07 LLC; ab. CA r ; LLC; to C127 LLC; ae. CSU LLC; al D & D Management & Investment LLC; ag. D & S Management and Investment LLC; ah. DJB Financial Holdings LLC; + +sA Co + +ai. DYMMU LLC; + +aj. Full Circle Fort Lauderdale LLC; + +ak. Full Circle Trademark Holdings LW; + +al. GHWI LLC; + +am. IDNL LEAH LLC; + +an. ILK3 LLC; + +ao. IS Management LLC; + +ap. JRCL LLC; + +aq. Judah LLC; + +ar. Kendall Sports Bar; + +as. Kip Hunter Marketing LLC. + +at. NF Servicing LLC; + +au. NRI II LLC; + +ay. NRI 15 L + +aw. NS HoI LC; + +ax. Pte; + +alS. PK Adventures LLC; + +PK's il. Ride Ltd; + +Akmak ba. Rothstein Family Foundation; + +bb. RRA Consulting Inc.; + +bc. RRA Goal Line Management LLC; + +bd. RRA Sports and Entertainment LLC; + +Co s + +be. RSA 11'" Street LLC; + +bf. RW Collections LLC; + +bg. S & KEA LLC; + +bh. Scorh LLC; + +bi. Tipp LLC; + +bj. VGS LLC; + +bk. The Walter Family LLC; + +bl. Walter Industries LLC; + +bm. WPBRS LLC; + +bn. WAWW; + +bo. WAWW 2 LLC; + +bp. WAWW 3 LLC; + +bq. WAWW 4 LLC; + +br. WAWW + +bs. WAWW 6 LLC; + +bt. WAWW 7 LLC; + +blk, SVAWW 8 LLC; + +WAWW 9 LLC; + +. WAWW 10 LLC; + +WAWW 11 LLC; bx. + +by. WAWW 12 LLC; + +bz. WAWW 14 LLC; + +- ca. cb. +- cc. cd. ce. cf. cg. ch. +- ci. WAWW 15 LLC; WAWW 16 LLC; WAWW I7 LLC; WAWW 18 LLC; WAWW 19 LLC; WAWW 20 LW; WA WW 21 LLC; WAWW 22 LLC; JB Boca M Holdings LLC; + +and + +- G. Contributions ("C"), hereinafter, contributions:" 2 COFFEY B UR LINGTON + +and has not extended access to core financial matters and records to any other attorney at the firm. + +- 4. Plaintiff Rosenfeldt and Defendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. +- 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. +- 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's prince is in Broward County. + +# BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISS UQION + +### The Firm + +- 7. The firm was founded by Plaintiff +- 8. The firm's practice was origins d Defendant Rothstein in 2002. on labor and employment law, but the firm grew rapidly and its practice areas ex to include intellectual property, corporate law, mergers and acquisitions, real es , c defense, class actions, mass torts and personal injury claims, among others. +- 9. The fi current y as seven offices, with locations in Florida, New York, and Venezuela, and e loys aver 70 lawyers. +- 10. ( c rin e has an outstanding group of attorneys, staff members, including distingu er judges, many of whom have statewide, even national reputations, for profess' !excellence. + +### The Settlement Funding Scheme + +- 11. Firm lawyers learned in the past few days about irregularities surrounding a settlement funding business operated by Rothstein. The settlement funding business involved + +3 COFFEY B URLINGTON + +the purchase of structured legal settlements and the sale of these settlements to investors. + +Various investors have informed the firm that they believe that substantial funds are not properly accounted for and are missing. A review of the firm's records undertaken over this past weekend indicates that various funds unrelated to the direct practice of law cannot be accounted for, circumstances suggesting that investor money may have been misused by Rothstein who controlled all such accounts. Some investors allege that Defendant Rothstein may halie been fabricating non-existent structured legal settlements for sale to investors. + +12. Defendant Rothstein's allegedly improper activities were done without any knowledge of the other attorneys at the firm, and, in fact, Rothstein actively endeavored to hide the existence of the scheme. It was not until several days,agOtha Plaintiff Rosenfeldt or any of 1(\/: the other lawyers at the firm discovered some of the cfkunistances concerning Defendant Rothstein's actions and the alleged improprieties. + +13. The firm's attorneys still have extremely limited knowledge concerning the allegations, and yet, recognize the importairce of proceeding expeditiously to undercover the truth. Thus, the emergency transfer 6O11 corporate powers to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt, or, in the alternative, the emerge cy appdmtment of Plaintiff Rosenfeldt as the fum's custodian or the appointment of a jeceiveL is critical to undertake at least a preliminary inquiry concerning Defendant Roll conduct, and to make appropriate recommendations to the Court concenu inyArther investigation. + +### Misuse of the Investor Trust Accounts + +14. With respect to the settlement funding scenario, Plaintiffs only recently discovered troubling information concerning Defendant Rothstein's investor trust accounts and details surrounding the transactions are still emerging. However, it appears that Defendant + +> 4 COFFEY B UR L I NGTON + +Rothstein may have transferred substantial sums out of the investor trust accounts, and that the emergency transfer of all corporate powers to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt, or, in the alternative, the emergency appointment of Plaintiff Rosenfeldt as the firm's custodian or the appointment of a receiver, is necessary to account for and, if appropriate, consider taking action to recover the missing investor trust account funds. + +### Shareholder Deadlock + +15. Defendant Rothstein has declined to resign despite the asse irregularities because he purports to hold a 50% share of the law fi others, there is a substantial shareholder deadlock, making m c )emi: the firm as it currently stands impossible. ASd substantial reason, among + +#### COUNT\_ (DISSOLUTI + +16. Plaintiffs adopt, incorporate,. nd re\$Jege paragraphs 1-15. + +17. Under Florida Statute 607430, a circuit court may dissolve a corporation in a , proceeding by a shareholder if Oct "gement of corporate affairs is deadlocked and irreparable injury to the corporation is threatened or being suffered. Additionally, a circuit court may dissolve a corporation ng 35 or fewer shareholders if a sufficient showing is made with respect. to imp /p' or irregular conduct that materially injures the corporation. + +8 .O r the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs have demonstrated these two grounds for e firm. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment of dissolution and all other such remedies that the Court finds appropriate. + +> 5 COFFEY B URL1NGTON + +OFFICE IN THE GROVE. PEN mousE 2699 SoutH BAY\$HORE DRIVE MIAMI. Fimitime. 33133 T: 305.858.2900 F: 305.858.5261 + +#### COUNT U (TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDT) + +19. Plaintiffs adopt, incorporate, and reallege paragraphs 1-18. + +20. Florida Statute 607.1431(3) permits a court in dissolution proceedings to take any action required to preserve the corporate assets wherever located, and carry on the business of the corporation. + +21. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs submit that the Court' ise this discretionary power is appropriate to transfer all corporate power over the aintiff Rosenfeldt to effect the dissolution request in Count I, to perform an ccounting of the firm's assets and liabilities, to undertake all actions necessary to unee extent of Defendant Rothstein's activities, to wind down the firm's client engagements, to appoint a chief restructuring officer and an inventory attorney pursuant to Florida Bar Rule 1-3.8, to institute federal banlcruptcy proceedings or other related state'laW proceedings, to file assignments for the benefits of creditors, and to undertake all such her actions as may be necessary and appropriate under law. \_7 7 + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that the Court transfer all corporate power over the firm to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt. + +# (c COUNT III (IN THE ALTERNATIVE, APPOINTMENT OF i • NTIFF ROSENFELDT AS CUSTODIAN OF THE FIRM) + +t . . Plaintiffs adopt, incorporate, and reallege paragraphs I-18. + +23. Florida Statutes 607.1431(3) and 607.1432 permit a circuit court in a judicial dissolution to appoint a custodian to manage the business and affairs of the dissolving corporation. + +24. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs request, in the alternative to Counts II and IV, that the Court appoint Plaintiff Rosenfeldt, the President of the firm and sole shareholder besides Defendant Rothstein, as custodian of the Firm to effect the dissolution requested in Count I, to perform an accounting of the firm's assets and liabilities, to undertake all actions necessary to uncover the extent of Defendant Rothstein's activities, to wind down the firm's A client engagements, to appoint a chief restructuring officer and an inventory attorney iursuant to Florida Bar Rule 1-3.8, to institute federal bankruptcy proceedings or other relat,tate law C '?' proceedings, to file assignments for the benefits of creditors, and to undettakn\_a\_ ll uch other actions as may be necessary and appropriate under law. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand, in the alternative, that Court appoint + +### COUNT I (IN THE ALTERNATIVE, APPOINT OF A RECEIVER} + +25. Plaintiffs adopt, incorporate, and reallege paragraphs 1-18. + +26. Florida Statutes 607.1431(3) and 607.1432 permit a circuit court in a judicial dissolution to appoint a receiver to wnid up and liquidate the business and affairs of the dissolving corporation. + +27. For the rears stated herein, Plaintiffs request, in the alternative to Counts II and III, that the Cot point a receiver to effect the dissolution requested in Count I, perform an accounti g firm's assets and liabilities, undertake all actions necessary to uncover the exte ndant Rothstein's activities, and to undertake all such other actions as may be necessary and appropriate under law. + +#### CONCLUSION + +28. Defendant Rothstein's conduct in connection with the settlement funding and the investor mist accounts appears at this point to be extensive. Dissolution and the emergency transfer of all corporate powers to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt, or, in the alternative, the emergency appointment of Plaintiff Rosenfeldt as the firm's custodian or the appointment of receiver, are critical to uncover the full extent of Defendant Rothstein's activities, to consider appropriate action to recover missing proceeds, to protect the firm's clients, and to p rcs rotect and review the firm's accounts and financial records.) + +Dated this 3rd day of November, 2009. + +C + +/< 9C) r pectfully submitted, + +S COFFEY BURLINGTON Counsel for Plaintiffs 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 858-2900 + +> I& KENDALL OFFEY Florida Bar N . 259861 kcoffey®coffeyburlington.com + +8 COFFEY B URLI NG TON + +OTTICK IN THE. GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33133 T: 305.858.2900 F: 305.858.5261 Email: info@coffeyburlington.com www.coffeyburlington.com + +Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is an affidavit from Plaintiff Rosenfeldt attesting to the truthfulness of the allegations contained herein. + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that on this 3rd day of November, 2009, with the agreement and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at meeko51@yahoo.com. + +This 3rd day of November, 2009. + +*I/S/ [unintelligible]* +*fla Bar No.* +*823244* + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +9 +COFFEY BURLINGTON + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNDER SEAL -CIV.MARRA + +EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, + +Plaintiffs. vs. + +404 1 + +INTERNATI 'AL INC. a/k/a ICON BY . + +O 4r Defendant. + +#### ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' ORE TerVIIN MOTION TO SEIZE FURTHER ASSETS AND FOR OTHER RELIEF + +This cause came before the Coun at beeline 7, 18, 19 & 20 2009, upon Plaintiffs', EDWARD MORSE and CAROL ( Ilectively "MORSE"), ore :emus Motion to Seize Further Assets and on, cl subsequent written motions for other relief. The Court has carefully considered the oral argument of counsel, considered the evidence and witnesses presented at the hearings and being otherwise fully advised in the premises; + +#### The COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: + +- 1. Defendant, .7., INTERNATIONAL, INC:. a/k/a ICON BY and al a co arias and/or other entities owned or controlled by and any. (e), r compensatory damages to MORSE in an amount in excess of 000.00: + +al is liable to MORSE for punitive damages for fraud, in the amount of 21,000,000.00 modified from prior order of this court finding liability of S3,000,000.00 in punitive damages; + +Page I of 6 EXHIBIT + +- 3. The Court specifically finds thatM flagrant fraudulent activity as demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence by counsel for Morse provides sufficient legal basis for an award of such punitive damages. The record on this matter shall be scaled but the record upon which this Court has relied shall be attached hereto for appellate purposes; +- 4. That there is currently in excess of \$10,000,000.00 of funds clearly belonging to.. frozen in various banks in South Florida pursuant to prior orders of this and other couns; +- 5. That these funds are not to be moved under any circumstances absent further order of this Court. That movement of these funds shalt be punishable by civil and criminal penalties: +- 6. That these funds are specifically being held, pursuant to rder this Court, to fund the award of damages to MORSE: +- 7. That these courts have jurisdiction to order +- 8. That in addition to the funds set forth 4 above, based upon clear and convincing evidence presented by counsel for MORSE and counsel's expert witnesses, has illegally moved funds from the United States to the Cayman Islands in violation of federal law. for the purpose of secreting these assets; +- 9. That the IRS has provided competent testimony in this regard clearly establishing ownership of these funds by= and clearly establishing a partial right of entitlement by tIT IRS to a portion of these funds. Such liability shall be less than 55.000,000.00; +- 10. Court has jurisdiction over said assets as they originated in the United States; the treaties between the United States and the Cayman Islands and related governments clearly establishes the right of the United States to seize such assets. That counsel for MORSE has facilitated the contact between the relative governments and as a + +mutt. this Court has received clear and convincing evidence that such funds wilt be immediately transferred to the United States: + +- 12. That the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to immediately submit the proper documentation to the appropriate bank of the Cayman Islands to facilitate immediate transfer of these funds. That any issue arising from such transfer shall be inuneklitly reported to this Court; AS +- 13. That the evidence presented by counsel for was inadoq me the findings made by this court based upon the evidence presented oou for MORSE. That counsel for is hereby is found to have actggnn tuntacious disregard for ./frs prior orders of this and other courts and thus, is found tn, ....7 contempt thereof Further order regarding same shall follow the evidentiary hvaring in this regard to be set by this Court: +- 14. That MORSE shall be entitled to one-third of any monies collected from counsel for pursuant to said contempt order, if monies arc assessed: 15 That this Court has entered an order freezing said assets and has the authority to do so; +- 16. That counsel's arguments that this Court lacks such jurisdiction is without merit and frivolous;"i +- 17. Tha presentation of such evidence by counsel for demonstrates a luck of a Cn + - titbit Innis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, I I: LI . MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by , that said funds are hereby frozen and not subject to any activity by or any agent of whether situated here or in the United States: + +19. That these funds shall be frozen for the purpose of satisfying the judgment of this Coon against and in MORSE's favor; + +20. That MORSE shah be required to deposit to their attorney's trust account the sum of 515,000.000 00 no later than 10:00 a.m. tomorrow morning, the 20th day of March. 2009, to secure in the event of an illegal seizure of said funds. If such funds arrhuSeo 71 posted, this order shall be null and void in its entirety and the case according to further order of (his Court; + +21. That counsel for MORSE shall appear before this Court and testil und#r oath. as to his receipt of these funds, under penalty of perjury and subject to action by the Florida Bar; + +22. That based upon argument and representations of MORSE's Counsel. made under oath, MORSE is suffering from significant financial distress doe to the economy and that such a posting could cause severe and Irreparable harm to MORSE; thus, as swiftly as possible, in a manner that does not interfetc with the mission of the federal agencies now herewith involved, however, with the full and unfettered cooperation of the federal agencies now involved in this matter, following the posting by Morse of 515,000,000.00 associated with the seiztue-Cif the funds located in the Caymans. all other bond amounts shall be retumed,to MORSE as follows: \$15,000.000.00 previously posted by MORSE, S4.1 7.00 previously posted by MORSE, and the \$18,500,000.00 posted in two e postings by MORSE. MORSE's counsel shall act as liason between his clients e federal agencies to expedite return of the funds. Should there be any unnecessary delay in such return of funds. Counsel for MORSE shall appear before this Court on an emergency basis to seek whatever assistance is required, and such assistance shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Clerk of the Courts is ordered to take all steps necessary to + +assist counsel in expediting return of the funds to MORSE in a timely and expedited fashion; + +- 23. Further, within three (3) business days of the Clerk's receipt of said funds herewith being transferred from the Cayman Islands in compliance with this order, said amount being approximately 520,000,000.00, shall notify this Court of same so that this Court an order as to the division of said funds. Within five (5) business days o it order dividing same, that portion belonging to MORSE shall be deliver counsel; +- 24. The Court finds that has waived its right to al order of interest and penalties based upon the doctrine of fraud in the i e court finds that is not entitled to equitable relief of any kind fact the doctrine that he who seeks equity must do equity. JON,S14/h un hands and thus can not recover anything from MORSE: via their 25.lhat this Court has jurisdiction over the Court currently hearing the master known as MIZNER, referred to in the Court record by number and hereafter referred to as +- 26. Thai this Court orders the Court below (MILNER) to release any and all bond funds held pursuant to prior order of that court within three (3) business days of the entry of this order. Counsel for MORSC shall facilitate same and insure that same occurs. Should there be a delay, counsel for MORSE shall appear before this Court on an emergency basis and seek whatever assistance is needed to achieve the established objectives; +- 27. Counsel for the parties are instructed to insure that all deadlines in this Order are satislied in a timely fashion. subject to further order of this Court; + +28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and + +29. That pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act as amended on October 21, 2008, The Freedom of Information Act, The United States Patriot Act i1, The Currency and Foreign Transaction Reporting Act of 1970 as amended on November 11, 2006, USC 5311.5300, the UeA Patricia Act, Title 111 and the judgment of this Court based upon information received under oath, this Order, the facts of and amounts contained herein, the findings hereof, and any and all other matters surrounding same shall be held in strict confidence so as not to jeopardize any potential investigation by the appropriate governmental agencies. Violation of this portion of this order shall result in civil and criminal penalties. + +DONE AND ORDERED in 25i° day of March , 2009. at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this + +Copies to; All counsel of record IRS, Plantation Office FBI, Miami Office + +K + +( S Y' + +KENNETH A MARRA United States District Judge + +• + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRJCI COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNDER SEAL -OV-NIARRA + +EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, + +Plaintiffs, + +vs. + +INTER TIONAL afkra ICON BY MM, + +Defendant. + +### STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDC) + +- I. On March 24,2009, this Court entered a detailed regard to its Final Findings in this mater ("Final Order"). +- 2. As a direct result of the nature of a ACS" mount of the evidence presented to this Court prior to the Court emeri is Fr Order, and as a result of the contents of that Final Order, this Court h m e etennination that the Final Order itself as well as the evidence leading to nx I be sealed and shall remain confidential, in perpetuity, unless otherwi dered by this Court or another court of competent jurisdiction as detaile this C fidentiality Order. ljzfoor +- 3. Al par s to this muter, including all witnesses thereto, are hereby bound by this + identiality Order. +- 4. Any failure to comply tcith this Confidentiality Order by any party or witness shall result in se'ere consequeices. including. without limitation, civil and criminal penalties. + +- 5 Any breach of this Confidentiality Order must be reported to the Court, immediately by the discovering party. Failure to so report same shall result in severe consequences, including, without limitation. civil and criminal penalties. +- 6. The Final Order of this court dated March 24. 2009 shall be made a part hereof, and shall be incorporated by reference herein. +- 7. Any failure to comply with this Confidentiality Order or Final Order, must be tetkorted to this court, under seal, and such non compliance shall result in seve breaching party. nces to the +- 3. All information relating this Court's Final Order to y party is given access or which is made available to any party is h referred to as "Confidential Information." Confidential Information s i lu ,without limitation, all methods and systems used in this case, narnes ses of customers, technical memoranda, research reports, investigativ ons, analyses of any part of this case, all data, documents, and technology- orytracts, depositions, notes of depositions, clients notes, clients diaries, lawye L °tea, court notes, court orders preceding this order, pleading, all fiL discovery, all other electronic communications between any and all parties, witne awyers, and/or other participating in any way in this matter, proprietary on 4r ng to transfer of funds fraudulent or otherwise. posting of bonds, return of bonds. . historical and projected financial information. acts of fraud, information attorneys fees. operating data and organizational structures. now or hereafter existing or previously developed or acquired. regardless of whether any such information. data or documents qualify as "trade secrets" under applicable lass. any and all other information related to this or any other related matter (collectively. the "Confidential Information"). + +Because the secrecy of the Confidential lriformation is critical to this court and its further proceedings which shall also remain confidential until brought public, the parties and witnesses hereto acknowledge and agree that the Confidential Information shall, at all times, be kept in strict confidence by the party and/or witness and same shall not, directly or indirectly, during or after the entry of this order arid its execution, except as required by law, with the prior written consent of this court, (a) disclose to any persoti or entity any Confidential Information without the express written consent of this etitirt which may "- be withheld in its sole discretion. or (b) use any Confidential Information for the parties own benefit or any other purposes, for the benefit or purposes of any other person or entity or in any manner, whatsoever. If the party or witness is required in any civil or N / Ir criminal legal proceeding, regulatory proceedinrof similar process to disclose any part of the Confidential Information, such party shall give prompt notice of such request to the Court and the Court shall etieetan otter as it deems appropriate. Nothing shall be disclosed without same. + +- \* +- 9. All Confidential Inf t4ati eluding, without limitation, alt copies of all documents and other materials t14/v PITE the parties have received or reviewed or otherwise have knowled of, s A, at all times, be kept in strict confidence by the party. +- 10. ie have been advised and fully understand the heightened confidentiality ments relative to this matter. including, among other things, the legal obligations f lawyers to maintain their confidentiality obligations to clients and the parties legal obligation to maintain the confidentiality set forth in this order. Clients are restricted from discussing this miner with any individual or entity other than their respective counsel of record in this matter. The parties have indicated that they . as a result of this action. have + +access to certain Confidential Information as detined herein. By execution of this order, the parties recognize, acknowledge and confirm their understanding of the confidential nature of the Confidential Information and the damage that would result if any of the Confidential Information is disclosed to any Person and the parties understand their obligation to this court and the fact that this court has jurisdiction over them upon execution of this document by their consent thereto. + +- I I. Further, because disclosure of any Confidential Information as result in severe damage as contemplated by this Court, w ( Pah herein would be difficult to quantify, the parties agree that liquidated damages would bet—t reasonable basis to calculate civil damages caused by a breach and that damages of \$1,000,000.00 per each incident of disclosure of Confidential information by the parties and/or their representatives is agreed to under thistonfidzentiality Order. Such liquidated damages shall not prevent this Court from asse'Mg additional damages and from moving forward in a criminal proceeding against\*Tarty so breaching this Confidentiality Order. +- 12. Each party hereby rtpreseIVand warrants that they are not bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement or other agreement with any third party that would conflict with an f the les' obligations under this Confidentiality Order. +- 13. T ie ipulate that this Stipulated Confidentiality Order is intended to strictly limit 1e\ k vent disclosure of information and production of documents compromising the confidential Information set forth herein and in the Final Order dated March 24 2009. +- 14. It is further acknowledged that each party may be held responsible for any failure on his or her part to coinply uith the provisions of the Confidentiality Order, and agrees to + +subject himself or het-self to the jurisdiction of this court for the purpose of enforcing this Confidentiality Order + +- IS. The restrictions set forth in this Confidentiality Order shall apply to any and all documents or other information, whatsoever, designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" by this Court. All information shall be deemed confidential and the parties agree to exercise extreme discretion in protecting same. The Court hereby warns all parties,heacto err on the side of protecting such data. Violation of this order will be dealt th immediately and subject --,\_ J I the violator to severe sanctions and penalties. +- 16. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and,-their respective agents, successors and assigns, and inure to the benefit 'Ofhil parties and their respective '1\7 successors and assigns. .4 \-\ y +- 17. The parties warrant to each other that h have full power and authority to execute this Agreement for and on be I themselves and/or their respective companies. Parties. as used herein, s 1 i e all persons executing this document as well as their representatives, age is and tgns. 13 Each party pl ng their signature hereon makes the following attestation: + +1 c ly an cknowledge, under penalty of perjury, that I have received a copy of the S ul tfre 301 ' d Confidentiality Order (the 'Confidentiality Order") which governs the uction and use of confidential documents and information produced by the Parties (as defined in the Order) or third parties in this case. I have read and understand the Order and I hereby acknowledge that I am bound by it and agree to abide by it I further understand that inIbmiation designated as -CONFIDENTIALin this case. and any notes, memoranda or other form of information derived from it. + +( + +■ not be used, copied or disclosed by me to anyone else except in strict accordance with the order and then only for the prosecution and defense of this litigation upon proper court order. + +[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES] + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +*[Handwritten signature]* +EDWARD J. MORSE + +STATE OF Florida ) +COUNTY OF Board ) + +BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared EDWARD J. MORSE who, after being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he has read the foregoing document and that it is true and correct under penalty of perjury. + +SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 27 day of March, 2009. + +*[Handwritten signature]* +(Signature of Notary Public) + +*[Handwritten signature]* +(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) + +![](_page_93_Picture_16.jpeg) + +COMMISSION NUMBER/EXPIRATION/SEAL + +United States Court of Appeals, + +Eleventh Circuit. + +Under Seal-Civ-Marra. + +EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, + +v. + +INTERNATIONAL, INC. a/k/a ICON BY MM. Defendant-Appellee. + +In re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. + +Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Under Seal-Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. + +### PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS + +Petitioners, EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, by and through their undersigned counsel, file this, their Motion for Emergency Writ of Mandamus and would state as follows: + +- 1. This matter is before this Honorable Court on an Emergency Writ of Mandamus. +- 2. This matter and the entire file below have been presented to the court as SEALED pursuant to prior order of the Court below. + - 3. This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, '17 16C +- 4. On 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered details orders in this matters which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Kenneth Marra. +- 5. set forth in the Orders, Judge Marra ordered that certain specific acts take place on certain specific dates. Many of these acts involved return of a large sum of money to the Plaintiffs. + +6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply withuid orders. + +7. In hearings held subsequent to the entry of these orders, it became abundantly clear to the undersigned that Judge Marra was in some way uncomfortable with his orders and was either staying the orders or reversing his prior decisions by vacating the orders. + +8. However, despite continuous inquiry by the undersigned, counsel was unable to determine what Judge Marra intended to do and how he intended to proceed. + +9. A thorough review of the record below which is available to this Court under seal clearly indicates that the undersigned, as counsel for the plaintiff had significant basis for concern based upon comments and ore tenus rulings made by Judge Marrs in the court below. + +10. Most importantly, as can be seen by the sealed record now before this court, when the undersigned specifically inquired of the Court as to whether he was permitted to move forward with the orders entered on March 25th and April 23rd , the courts responses to the undersigned are nonKlescriptive and completely without guidance at best. + +11. When the undersigned, inquired of the court below further and specifically asked the court whether the orders were stayed, vacated, reversed or in full force and effect, the court clearly replied that the court believes it had made itself clear. + +12. Not wanting to violate a court order of a respected district court judge, the undersigned determined that the only course of conduct remaining in order to protect his clients' rights was to file an Emergency Writ of Mandamus with this court + +13. It is the position of the Plaintiffs that they have a clear and unwavering legal right to the relief awarded them in the courts orders as set forth herein. + +14. Moreover, it is without doubt that the undersigned had every right to be concerned . . with the ore tutus rulings of the court below which post dated the orders in question. + +15. As an officer of the court, the undersigned has a direct responsibility to zealously protect the rights of his client. And, as an officer of the court, the undersigned has a direct responsibility to fully and completely obey the orders of court and when, he is given reason to doubt the efficacy of subsequent orders of court that appear to taint the order in question, to attempt to ascertain the validity of said order. That is exactly what the undersigned has done here. + +16. Upon determining that the validity of the orders in question were in doubt, and upon determining that he could not proceed without further order of a higher court, this Emergency Writ was filed. + +17. Plaintiffs have a clear legal right to the relief specifically set forth in the orders in question. + +18. The court below bad an indisputable duty to act but failed to do so and failed to given the undersigned any guidan + +19. At this stage in the ings, the Plaintiffs have no other remedy at law other than this Writ. + +20. If thfs is not entered in Plaintiffs favor, the Plaintiffs will suffer unfair prejudice as a • law. + +Dated this day of , 2009. + +Respectfully submitted, + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER + +Counsel for Petitioners + +Las Olas City Centre + +401 E. Las Olas Boulevard + +Suite 1650 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Tel: (954) 522-3456 + +Fax: (954) 527.8663 + +Email: s + +By: + +. Rothstein, Esq. + +Florida Bar No: 6588 + +FOR THE FIRM + +RaISSTLIN RosF.NEEIDT ADLER + +Las Olas City Ceiure.401E. Las Olas Buukvard, Suite 1650. Enn Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +United States Court of Appeals, + +Eleventh Circuit. + +Under Seal-Civ-Mara. + +EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, + +v. + +ENTER.NATION.AL, LNC. a/k/a ICON BY MI= Defendant-Appellee. + +In re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. + +August 13, 2009. + +Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern D nda (Under Seal-Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. + +On Petition for Writ of Mandarn \ + +#### ( S:4 ORDER ON EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS + +Having reviewed the sealed court file as provided by the Clerk of the Court below (Judge Mara), and having heard' argument of counsel in closed proceedings to maintain the integrity of the confidentiality order issued in this matter by the Court below, as well as having heard directly from Judge Marra and Judge Gerber, we find as follows: + +,--- + +Before Susan H. Black, Circuit Judge: + +#### Findings of Fact + +\ The Court below entered orders on March 25, 2009 and April 23, 2009. specifying that certain specific acts were to take place on certain specific dates. Many of these action; involved return of fund; rightfiilly belonging to the Plaintiffs. + +2. Subsequent to the entry of same, Judge Marra, despite his rulings to the contrary, made multiple ore tenus rulings on the record which gave counsel for Plaintiff clear room for pause in following said orders. + +3. In multiple subsequent hearings, Plaintiffs counsel clearly attempted to ascertain whether the orders stood as entered or whether they had been reversed or stayed. Based upon our MI and complete review of the record it became clear that Judge Marra had no intention of proceeding as he previously ordered and was either or staying his prior orders as set forth above. Whichever his intention is notibr to decide. We simply review this matter as it is presented to us, to wit: lawful-orders were entered and then vacated or stayed for no clear and convincing reason and without a stated basis in law or fact. We make no finding whether Judge Main was correct in his conclusion, but simply that the record lacked the thoroughness and completeness that is mandated when reversing orders of this magnitude. + +4. Thus, we find that counsel for Plaintiff properly and timely tiled a sealed / Emergency Writ of Mandamus with this Court in an attempt to property protect his clients rights under the order. 44"..\_ + +#### Conclusions of Law + +I. Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the laws controlling ri f andarnus + +s matter is properly before this court + +The findings of Judge Marra in the court below, in the orders dated March + +25 and April 23, 2009, are well based in fact and law. + +4. The subsequent ore tenus rulings of fudge Marra are without basis in In or fact. + +5. The subsequent ore tenus rulings by Judge Marra fail to provide a sufficient record, as mandated by the rules of court, to allow this court to enter a ruling as to whether Judge Marra had the legal right to stay or reverse his prior order. + +6. Plaintiffs writ of mandamus is legally sufficient to allow this court t rule in full on all matters pending before it. 0 + +Thus, we as a Court with jurisdiction over this matter find as follows: + +7. Judge Marra's prior orders are hereby reinstated and remain fail force and effect. To the extent that the later order conflicts with the earlier order, the later order shall prevail and control. + +8. Judge Marra's concerns regarding protection of the Governments role in this matter are well founded in both law and f e alfically defer further comment on this portion of this matter to maintain of the governments investigation. + +( 14/ 9. As a matter of proeedure t we note that a confidentiality order remains in full force and effect in this . We specifically mandate that our rulings herein shall have no effect, w er, n said order and that same shall remain in full force and effect in perp again strongly caution all counsel and mandate that they caution and co ir respective clients that this matter is governed by a strict confidentiality order that t s court hereby holds shall remain in full force and effect and which this court strongly cautions, contains severe penalties lot any violation of suite. + +10. This order and the complete sealed record shall be forwarded to the Department of Treasury, forthwith. The clerk of this court is ordered to expedite same. Sealed instructions shall be provided by this court to the Clerk. + +11. The Department of Treasury is ordered to expeditiously review the materials and then, upon completion of same, shall immediately send a letter to this court advising that such review is complete and that they require nothing further from this court. Upon receipt of same, the clerk of this court shall advise Plaintiffs counsel Writ has been granted in . and that be is free to comply fully and co Judge Marra's orders. A copy of this order shall then be provided to all coun \_ odecord. + +12. This order shall not be furnished to any counsel of record until such time as the Department of Treasury has completed its review of the sealed record and has forwarded said letter as mandated above this court. This order is self executing and thus, nothing need be brought back before this court on any of these issues. + +- 13. Plaintiffs have a clear legal right to the remedies they are seeking. +- 14. The court below had an indisputable duty to act but failed to to do so. +- 15. The plaintiffs have other remedy available to them in law or equity. +- 16. if this court !r4, pot act, the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm and unfair prejudice. (S , + +DOrn ORDERED in at Atlanta, Georgia, this /-3 day of August, 2009. + +Copies to: IRS, Plantation Office + +t[ii/14,/,.\_,, /St Gnited States Ate alt Court Judge United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit + +FBI, Miami Office +U.S. Dept of Treasury, Washington, D.C. +Clerk of Court, United States District Court + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +--- \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11c6646fd512688017a758fa8648bce166e49bd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/EFTA02759203.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,5280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 103, + "chars": 144626, + "elapsed_seconds": 21.4, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_93_Picture_16.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.292, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.292, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 370.98 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMARY OF ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 509.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 381.29388427734375, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 381.29388427734375, + 646.6800079345703 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 646.6800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 375.9945068359375, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 375.9945068359375, + 423.1800231933594 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 423.1800231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count I - Violation of \u00a7\u00a7772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. -\nFlorida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act \u2014 \nAgainst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 601.6925048828125 + ], + [ + 441.0350036621094, + 601.6925048828125 + ], + [ + 441.0350036621094, + 641.8050079345703 + ], + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 641.8050079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count II \u2014 Florida RICO -\n\"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act\" \nPursuant to 4095.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009), \nAgainst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 448.1882629394531, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 448.1882629394531, + 710.8050003051758 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 710.8050003051758 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count III - Abuse of Process \u2014\nAgainst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 603.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 390.17999267578125, + 603.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 390.17999267578125, + 631.2999877929688 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 631.2999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count IV -Fran\nAgainst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.964, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.2041320800781, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.2041320800781, + 381.54498291015625 + ], + [ + 242.964, + 381.54498291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conspiracy to Commit Fraud \nAgainst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 391.8198547363281, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 391.8198547363281, + 188.04498291015625 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 188.04498291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jury Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.62399999999997, + 587.4324951171875 + ], + [ + 336.0776672363281, + 587.4324951171875 + ], + [ + 336.0776672363281, + 602.0449981689453 + ], + [ + 276.62399999999997, + 602.0449981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.26799999999997, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 412.17523193359375, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 412.17523193359375, + 107.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 222.26799999999997, + 107.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RMATI N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.388, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 356.6343994140625, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 356.6343994140625, + 432.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 271.388, + 432.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.372, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 384.2353515625, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 384.2353515625, + 487.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 244.372, + 487.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.80400000000003, + 82.722 + ], + [ + 342.710205078125, + 82.722 + ], + [ + 342.710205078125, + 97.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 285.80400000000003, + 97.3170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE ENTERPRISE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 177.609 + ], + [ + 361.5196228027344, + 177.609 + ], + [ + 361.5196228027344, + 192.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 192.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE RACKETEERING CO SP", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.424, + 313.857 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 313.857 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 329.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 215.424, + 329.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 81.911 + ], + [ + 438.10528564453125, + 81.911 + ], + [ + 438.10528564453125, + 96.853515625 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 96.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE RACKETEERING ACTIVITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 394.14599999999996 + ], + [ + 486.8377685546875, + 394.14599999999996 + ], + [ + 486.8377685546875, + 409.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 409.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.72799999999998, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 485.1980285644531, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 485.1980285644531, + 151.447021484375 + ], + [ + 154.72799999999998, + 151.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. The roles of the conspirators were as follows:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.344, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 369.1503601074219, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 369.1503601074219, + 178.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 120.344, + 178.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Defendant SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN was a shareholder, Chairman and CFO of RRA.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.344, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 540.7860107421875, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 540.7860107421875, + 205.447021484375 + ], + [ + 120.344, + 205.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Other conspirators, known and unknown to the United States Attorney, agreed with", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.116, + 434.97 + ], + [ + 540.311767578125, + 434.97 + ], + [ + 540.311767578125, + 450.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 119.116, + 450.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MANNER AND MEANS OF THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.66799999999998, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.4270324707031, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.4270324707031, + 152.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 144.66799999999998, + 152.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 282.744, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 337.39886474609375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 337.39886474609375, + 94.81707763671875 + ], + [ + 282.744, + 94.81707763671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.968, + 394.957 + ], + [ + 339.70452880859375, + 394.957 + ], + [ + 339.70452880859375, + 410.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 410.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF TH&CONSPIRACY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.83199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 451.4114685058594, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 451.4114685058594, + 315.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 176.83199999999997, + 315.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTS 4 and 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.476, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.4132080078125, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.4132080078125, + 452.1870422363281 + ], + [ + 266.476, + 452.1870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FORFEITURE A EQATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 341.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 399.5944519042969, + 341.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 399.5944519042969, + 358.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 358.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Real Properties (\"RP\"):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.73, + 107.996 + ], + [ + 275.8716125488281, + 107.996 + ], + [ + 275.8716125488281, + 123.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 117.73, + 123.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Vehicles and Vessels (\"VV\"):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.57199999999999, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 303.05780029296875, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 303.05780029296875, + 422.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 121.57199999999999, + 422.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Tangibles (\"T\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 355.65599999999995 + ], + [ + 239.87310791015625, + 355.65599999999995 + ], + [ + 239.87310791015625, + 372.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 372.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Bank Accounts (\"BA\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.838, + 274.11800000000005 + ], + [ + 264.2925720214844, + 274.11800000000005 + ], + [ + 264.2925720214844, + 289.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 110.838, + 289.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Business Interests (\"BI\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 82.012 + ], + [ + 279.53668212890625, + 82.012 + ], + [ + 279.53668212890625, + 97.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 97.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.78999999999996, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 416.4983215332031, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 416.4983215332031, + 106.353515625 + ], + [ + 212.78999999999996, + 106.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PENALTY SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.525, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 363.08135986328125, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 363.08135986328125, + 133.353515625 + ], + [ + 267.525, + 133.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nSEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN \nAND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.732, + 73.08 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 73.08 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 114.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 312.732, + 114.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLEX BUSINESS DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.732, + 125.86 + ], + [ + 486.8145751953125, + 125.86 + ], + [ + 486.8145751953125, + 141.353515625 + ], + [ + 312.732, + 141.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DISSOLUTION \nAND FOR EMERGENCY TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWERS TO STUART A. \nROSENFELDT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR APPOINTMENT OF A \nCUSTODIAN ORRECEIVER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.8, + 341.852 + ], + [ + 530.2386474609375, + 341.852 + ], + [ + 530.2386474609375, + 397.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 91.8, + 397.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 489.63599999999997 + ], + [ + 393.2891845703125, + 489.63599999999997 + ], + [ + 393.2891845703125, + 504.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 504.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OF ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 422.531 + ], + [ + 372.6206359863281, + 422.531 + ], + [ + 372.6206359863281, + 438.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 438.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISS UQION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.076, + 287.094 + ], + [ + 459.1554870605469, + 287.094 + ], + [ + 459.1554870605469, + 302.73358154296875 + ], + [ + 167.076, + 302.73358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Firm", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 314.668 + ], + [ + 338.923828125, + 314.668 + ], + [ + 338.923828125, + 329.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 329.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Settlement Funding Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 609.872 + ], + [ + 394.8022155761719, + 609.872 + ], + [ + 394.8022155761719, + 624.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 624.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Misuse of the Investor Trust Accounts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 582.298 + ], + [ + 408.9522705078125, + 582.298 + ], + [ + 408.9522705078125, + 597.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 597.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Shareholder Deadlock", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.26599999999996, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 372.3770751953125, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 372.3770751953125, + 221.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 257.26599999999996, + 221.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT_ \n(DISSOLUTI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.318, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 361.64599999999996, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 361.64599999999996, + 369.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 268.318, + 369.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT U \n(TRANSFER OF CORPORATE POWER TO PLAINTIFF ROSENFELDT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 72.17899999999999 + ], + [ + 503.96295166015625, + 72.17899999999999 + ], + [ + 503.96295166015625, + 100.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 100.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(c COUNT III \n(IN THE ALTERNATIVE, APPOINTMENT OF \ni \u2022 NTIFF ROSENFELDT AS CUSTODIAN OF THE FIRM)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 493.9674987792969 + ], + [ + 472.8856506347656, + 493.9674987792969 + ], + [ + 472.8856506347656, + 558.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 558.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I \n(IN THE ALTERNATIVE, APPOINT OF A RECEIVER}", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 340.61999999999995 + ], + [ + 477.3857727050781, + 340.61999999999995 + ], + [ + 477.3857727050781, + 369.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 369.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 72.99 + ], + [ + 354.1940002441406, + 72.99 + ], + [ + 354.1940002441406, + 87.103515625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 87.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 86.67 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCase No. UNDER SEAL -CIV.MARRA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 115.39306640625 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 115.39306640625 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 152.7041015625 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 152.7041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' ORE TerVIIN \nMOTION TO SEIZE FURTHER ASSETS AND FOR OTHER RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 462.3891296386719, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 462.3891296386719, + 329.5945739746094 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 329.5945739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.06000518798828, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 471.0740966796875 + ], + [ + 107.06000518798828, + 471.0740966796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRJCI COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCase No. UNDER SEAL -OV-NIARRA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 66.415283203125 + ], + [ + 404.5965881347656, + 66.415283203125 + ], + [ + 404.5965881347656, + 106.4420166015625 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 106.4420166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.228, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 440.6993713378906, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 440.6993713378906, + 297.3120422363281 + ], + [ + 195.228, + 297.3120422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 455.59381103515625, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 455.59381103515625, + 327.3120422363281 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 327.3120422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "( S:4\nORDER ON EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 403.2867126464844 + ], + [ + 398.17041015625, + 403.2867126464844 + ], + [ + 398.17041015625, + 425.0755615234375 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 425.0755615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Findings of Fact", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.048, + 550.2866973876953 + ], + [ + 265.0341491699219, + 550.2866973876953 + ], + [ + 265.0341491699219, + 563.0755615234375 + ], + [ + 186.048, + 563.0755615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusions of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 326.523681640625, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 326.523681640625, + 501.5755615234375 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 501.5755615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759203" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/_page_93_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/_page_93_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..328f996b9a65dad857a40cc91fcda39596b29b0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759203/_page_93_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1c805e2e1fc8ba2c03d5f3379d6454058dac4c62b762f7ed4a91eafe24c165c6 +size 18271 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..173b399a7def7a0faa6705f3f45e92a2e19ccc71 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +Jeffrey Epstein + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. +1.201 + +**50 2009 CA O 4 0 8 0 0 XXXX MB** + +Defendants. + +CIVIL COVER SHEET + +II. TYPE OF CASE (Place an X in one box only. If the case fits more than one type of case, select the most definitive.) + +DOMESTIC RELATIONS + +TORTS + +OTHER CIVIL + +- Simplified Dissolution +- Dissolution +- Support - IV-D +- Support - Non IV-D +- URESA - IV-D +- URESA - Non IV-D +- Domestic Violence +- Other domestic relations + +- Professional Malpractice +- Products Liability +- Auto Negligence +- Other Negligence + +- Contracts +- Condominium +- Real Property/ + Mortgage foreclosure +- Eminent Domain +- Other + +III. Is Jury Trial in Complaint? + +- Yes +- No + +Date: December 7, 2009 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +303 Banyan Drive, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +By \_\_\_\_\_ + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. +Florida [REDACTED] at No. 224162 + +2009 DEC - 7 PM 4:48 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d8e09069619a33d0019caef2b749591ee26b984 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306/EFTA02759306.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759306.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1159, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.39, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 71.368 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 71.368 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 121.65 + ], + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 121.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 279.79499999999996 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 279.79499999999996 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 290.33799999999997 + ], + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 290.33799999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DOMESTIC RELATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 355.218 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 355.218 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TORTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 290.088, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 290.088, + 355.218 + ], + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 355.218 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OTHER CIVIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 343.864 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 355.218 + ], + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 355.218 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759306" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7fdfaaa3c0bcbb5da411744cb81ab9ad6dc5207b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Plaintiff,** +**v.** + +**CASE NO.** + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,** +**[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually,** +**and** +**L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +**50 2009 CA O 4 0 3 6 0 XXXX MB** + +**AG** + +2009 DEC - 7 PH 4:49 + +**SUMMONS** + +**PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON** + +**TO DEFENDANT(S): L.M.** +**798 Cotton Bay Drive West, Apartment 1410,** +**West Palm Beach, 33406.** + +**IMPORTANT** + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiffs Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU AREQMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +O4 + +DATED ON December 7, 2009 a ill 101 + +AS iti; + +(SEAL) + +(:..-..K C-.C:C Clerk & Comptroller P.O. Box 4667 West Palm Beach, FI 3341.)2-4f.r..7 + +(See Reverse Side) (Vease al reves) (Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![](_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg) + +SHARON R. BOCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +vs. +Case No: + +## IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +## IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d6de10b1496db0ba6d097cda73a35f25b66b631 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/EFTA02759307.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4501, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.28, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.7, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 507.348, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 507.348, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 290.7, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 315.9 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 343.43999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 440.6400000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 390.41999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759307" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10baf64561a7891acd88d679c06e1238bba8b884 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759307/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:846e3fee11defbfe313163958660e62c704569bb9263b2b8d62fe38741dfb516 +size 24129 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6127e1cac787bcc2c74ad178ea6eda315b80922e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.md @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +v. AG Plaintiff, CSE NO. 5 Ago re A 0 4 08 13192, 144B + +afaial ap T J. and ' ividually, individually, L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +/ + +g + +## SUMMONS + +# PERSONAL SERVICE ON A f RA 'PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): Scott Rothstein + +c/o Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington Office in the Grove, Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133 + +### IMPORTANT + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +4, ' ,' 1 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. +Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 7, 2009 + +DEC 07 2009 + +(SEAL) + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptrollers +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, FL +321402-4667 + +(See Reverse Side) +(Vease al reves) +(Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![]()Vikecia Armstrong + +vs. +Case No: + +## IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +## IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcfa9bbc0bcb84531d965ce308725997c0a6acb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310/EFTA02759310.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759310.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4404, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 341.5198669433594, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 341.5198669433594, + 316.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 316.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A f RA 'PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 444.3000183105469, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 444.3000183105469, + 344.4200134277344 + ], + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 344.4200134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 345.3209533691406, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 345.3209533691406, + 496.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 496.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 115.973 + ], + [ + 347.00399999999996, + 115.973 + ], + [ + 347.00399999999996, + 129.76 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 129.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 378.737 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 378.737 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 391.71299999999997 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 391.71299999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759310" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98159c305d2553d824528d9e378585e5298fbc10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +v. Plaintiff, + +CASE NO. + +**50 2009 CA O 4 0 3 0 U XXXX MB** + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and +L.M., individually, +Defendants. + +2009 DEC - 7 PM 4:49 + +SUMMONS + +PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], ~~ESP~~. +1109 NE 2nd Street +Hallendale Beach, FL 33009-8515 +954-294-9544 Cell + +IMPORTANT + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. +Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 7, 2009. + +DEC 07 2009 + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, Florida +33402-4667 + +(SEAL) + +(See Reverse Side) +(Vease al reves) +(Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![](_page_1_Picture_117.jpeg) + +SHARON R. BOCK +CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +![]()vs. +Case No: + +### IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f36272599a2105df1cbe45249b2e29c8ade30c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/EFTA02759313.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4502, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.34, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_117.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.7, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 507.348, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 507.348, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 290.7, + 123.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 314.28000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 441.864, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 441.864, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 341.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 343.332, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 343.332, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 452.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 389.61 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759313" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/_page_1_Picture_117.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/_page_1_Picture_117.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..812c3e1124c3f6d1d451def3380fbfd603dde29c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759313/_page_1_Picture_117.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a73793118dfa7bfc00a0dc998b18d286161744a11f29f101f2947e6674960e21 +size 22153 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d437271d89396bda958f466f8076ce5219f055a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +v. Plaintiff, + +CASE NO. +**50 2009 CA 0 4 0 8 0 U XXXX MB** + +AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and +L.M., individually, +Defendants. + +2009 DEC-7 PM 4:49 + +SUMMONS + +PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): + +Scott Rothstein ~~[REDACTED]~~ +c/o Kendall Coffey, Esq. +Coffey Burlington +Office in the Grove, Penthouse +2699 South Bayshore Drive +Miami, FL 33133 + +Not USED + +SHARON R. BJ-K. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL / PROC. +2009 DEC-8 PM 2 +FILED + +IMPORTANT + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/position with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. +Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 7, 2009 + +DEC 07 2009 + +(SEAL) + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, +FL 33402-4667 + +(See Reverse Side) +(Vease al reves) +(Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![]()Vikecia Artmire + +vs. +Case No: + +### **IMPORTANTE** + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### **IMPORANT** + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a7133407f7a8682a6dcbc889fcefdda3a3e374d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316/EFTA02759316.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759316.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4586, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.68, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 505.6309999999999, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 505.6309999999999, + 125.705 + ], + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 125.705 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.936, + 304.125 + ], + [ + 337.492, + 304.125 + ], + [ + 337.492, + 317.912 + ], + [ + 271.936, + 317.912 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.746, + 330.077 + ], + [ + 440.07499999999993, + 330.077 + ], + [ + 440.07499999999993, + 345.486 + ], + [ + 168.746, + 345.486 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.687, + 483.35599999999994 + ], + [ + 341.134, + 483.35599999999994 + ], + [ + 341.134, + 497.143 + ], + [ + 267.687, + 497.143 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.438, + 115.30399999999997 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 115.30399999999997 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 129.108 + ], + [ + 263.438, + 129.108 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.115, + 378.392 + ], + [ + 338.706, + 378.392 + ], + [ + 338.706, + 393.008 + ], + [ + 270.115, + 393.008 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759316" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb3765f31a2ae7c2bb50e024323ded9516fb1bf7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Plaintiff,** + +**CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +v. + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN** Individually, +**[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]**, individually, +and +**L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +**AMENDED SUMMONS** + +**(Have not attempted to serve - Amended only as to Place of Service)** + +**PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON** + +**TO DEFENDANT(S):** + +**Scott Rothstein, Register #91256-004 +c/o FDC, Miami +Federal Detention Center +33 NE 4th Street +Miami, FL 33132** + +**IMPORTANT** + +**SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT RECORDS / FILED +FILED** +**2009 DEC - 8 PM 2: 4:** + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +**SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, Florida +33402-4667** + +vS. Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiffs Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 8, 2002# v + +DEC 0 8009 + +(SEAL) + +(See Reverse Side) (Vease al reves) (Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![](_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg) + +SHARON R. BOCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +BY: L .--- h -yery\A-67t DEPUTY CLERK + +EDNA + +vs. +Case No: + +### IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9c8c47e6ad8e6ef88faca050652718a14737350 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/EFTA02759319.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4745, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.39, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.219, + 70.64399999999999 + ], + [ + 501.093, + 70.64399999999999 + ], + [ + 501.093, + 125.86 + ], + [ + 285.219, + 125.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.75799999999998, + 303.688 + ], + [ + 367.227, + 303.688 + ], + [ + 367.227, + 317.49199999999996 + ], + [ + 232.75799999999998, + 317.49199999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 345.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 435.96900000000005, + 345.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 435.96900000000005, + 358.904 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 358.904 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.114, + 470.1479999999999 + ], + [ + 337.077, + 470.1479999999999 + ], + [ + 337.077, + 483.95199999999994 + ], + [ + 264.114, + 483.95199999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.496, + 115.44599999999998 + ], + [ + 343.71, + 115.44599999999998 + ], + [ + 343.71, + 129.26700000000002 + ], + [ + 260.496, + 129.26700000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.73199999999997, + 379.67100000000005 + ], + [ + 335.87100000000004, + 379.67100000000005 + ], + [ + 335.87100000000004, + 393.492 + ], + [ + 267.73199999999997, + 393.492 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759319" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a4c5c876db02cac0f432b29c0c1f5aa9cc98c216 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759319/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b905975722d6670ec7397dd433a8f28c4cf8e7887afa9fb8d258e2b03abf80da +size 23933 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3eb903624077d6c93393fd59fc131c97030606f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.md @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +EDWARD D. CAMERON CERTIFIED PROCESS SERVER 7308 73rd Way West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 + +ASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG :OURT Circuit-Palm Beach + +DATE December 9, 2009 TYPE OF WRIT JEFFREY EPSTEIN SJMKONS, COMPLAINT + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, J. and L.M. + +# RETUIR OF E.:TRACE + +To 798 Cotton Bay Drive West, Apt. 1410 West Pehr 3each, Florida 33 + +O + +Received this writ on DECEMBER 8, 2009 at 9:00 A.M. and on DEC 3TV:3ER 8, 2909[3:30 P.M. I served it on within named IIIIIIIIMIII. in PALM BEACH County, Florida. + +[ ] INDIVIDUAL SERVICE: By serving upon the named (Defenaza a true copy of this writ with the date and hour of service endorsed by me and a copy of the Plaintiffs complaint, petition a ing. + +[e] SUBSTITUTE SERVICE: By leaving a true copy of this writ wit the and hour of service endorsed thereon by me and a copy of Plaintiffs Initial pleading as furnished by the Plaintiffsi giith in nailed (Defendant/Witness) usual place of abode with any person residing therein the age of 15 years or older to wit: SOUJER as CO-RESIDENT of Defendant, or to manager of Defendant's business and informing such person of their co ikrt pu silent to: F.S. 48.031, F.S. 48.031(2Xa), F.S. 48.031(2Xb). + +I ] CORPORATE SERVICE: By serving a true copy is wri: end a co)), of Plaintiffs Initial pleading to as an employee of Defendant corporation in compliance with F.S. 48.081(3) g as a leg:stered Agent in compliance with F.S. 48.091. + +[ ] POSTED [ I COMMERCIAL [ I RESIDENT Is: rzte-npt 2nd Attempt + +[ I NO SERVICE: For the reason that after dIfigenteeatrch and ir.c;:i:y failed to find said in County, Florida. + +COMMENT SOUDER: M, e, short hair, Y.: eyes, 5'11", 30 yrs. + +WITNESS FEE: + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUITIE OfiEMAN + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. + +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 40.0 + +West Palm Beach, Florida iibi.... 33 + +N + +By '7-e e I am a certified process server in good standing in the 15th Judicial Circuit. #401 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**CASE NO.** + +**Plaintiff,** +**v.** + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN** individually, +**[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]** individually, +and +**L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**00 2009 CAO 4 03 C UXXXXXB** + +**AG** + +**SUMMONS** + +**PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON** + +**TO DEFENDANT(S): L.M.** +**798 Cotton Bay Drive West, Apartment 1410,** +**West Palm Beach, 33403.** + +**IMPORTANT** + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. Case No: + +If you choose to file a written respor.:::: rumelf, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney named below,. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & CO 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +/\*- TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STA- F.: RE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/201\15"this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 7. 2009 + +( S'41 + +(SEAL) Cierk Q2 t1Cist p. 3o Pa Beach, + +(See ReSs de) (Vease al reves) (Voir de L'autre cote de) S -IA RON R. BOCK \_E ZK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +vs. +Case No: + +## IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. The 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda acjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su response por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por ou cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correcto entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +## IMPORTANTE + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete entarprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer voue-meme une reponse ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalité, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81ced7ca6d709c4ed0773d4edbbb4a14273e7fa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322/EFTA02759322.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759322.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6271, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETUIR OF E.:TRACE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.944, + 236.29199999999997 + ], + [ + 368.8028259277344, + 236.29199999999997 + ], + [ + 368.8028259277344, + 250.8450927734375 + ], + [ + 237.944, + 250.8450927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.536, + 79.152 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 79.152 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 134.64000000000001 + ], + [ + 292.536, + 134.64000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 310.08 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 310.08 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 326.4 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 326.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 338.63999999999993 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 338.63999999999993 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 354.96 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 354.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 436.56 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 436.56 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 452.88000000000005 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 452.88000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 134.13600000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 134.13600000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 149.868 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 149.868 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 396.612 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 396.612 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 411.51599999999996 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 411.51599999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759322" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8250ae85194d3b1cc20f8f834d38ab6992180dae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +**VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE** + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +COURT : CIRCUIT/PALM BEACH +CASE NO. : 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +TYPE OF WRIT: SUMMMONS/COMPLAINT + +TO: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +1109 NE 2nd Street +Hallendale Beach, FL 33009-8515 + +Received this Writ on Dec. 7, 2009, at 9:00 A.M. and on Dec. 8, 2009 at 12:40 P.M., I served it on the within named witness/Defendant. + +INDIVIDUAL SERVICE: By serving the person named herein a copy of this Summons and a copy of the Complaint, Petition or initial Pleading. + +XX SUBSTITUTE SERVICE: By serving a true copy of the above described Writ to the within named witness/Defendant's/Respondent's usual place of abode with any person residing therein above the age of fifteen (15) year of age, to-wit: Theresa Edwards/Spouse and informing such person of its contents. F.S. 48.031. + +CORPORATE SERVICE: By serving a copy of the Summons and a copy of the Plaintiff's initial Pleading to \_\_\_\_\_ of said Corporation, or by serving, \_\_\_\_\_ an employee of Defendant Corporation, or by serving, \_\_\_\_\_ pursuant to F.S. 48.091. + +![]()KENNETH [REDACTED], #188 +FOR: Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Ste. 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Notary not required pursuant to Florida +Statute 92.525. + +SIO +THERESA +EDWARDS +SPOUSE +12-24-07 +02-8-09 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIELD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complaint Ligation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, +v. + +CASE NO. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**CASE NO. DOCA 0408630 XXXXNB** + +**SUMMONS** + +PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): ██████████ J. EDWARDS, Esq. +1109 NE 2nd Street +Hallendale Beach, FL 33009-8515 +954-294-9546 Cod + +IMPORTANT + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +vs. +Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 7, 2009. ~~SEE 07 700~~ + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4687 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +~~P.O. Box 4687~~ + +(SEAL) + +SHARON R. BOCK +CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +![]()(See Reverse Side) +(Vease al reves) +(Voir de L'autre cote de) + +vs. +Case No: + +## IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda acjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no le protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +## IMPORTANTE + +Des poursuites judiciares ont été enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe auprès de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous étes obligé de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et de nom des parties nommées ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une reponse ecrite, il vous faudra également, en meme temps que cette formalité, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nommé ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b4930f2685f304789329553a72cb847de105923 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326/EFTA02759326.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759326.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5875, + "elapsed_seconds": 112.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 72.952 + ], + [ + 397.8, + 72.952 + ], + [ + 397.8, + 86.21600000000001 + ], + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 86.21600000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 306.0 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 306.0 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 326.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 326.40000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 334.56 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 334.56 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 354.96 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 354.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 444.72 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 444.72 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 465.12 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 465.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 135.453 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 135.453 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 150.411 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 150.411 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 398.0489999999999 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 398.0489999999999 + ], + [ + 339.04800000000006, + 413.00699999999995 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 413.00699999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759326" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b57e767dff027d070e3d090693cd694988aec0df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.md @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +**VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE** + +IN THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA + +TYPE OF WRIT: AMENDED SUMMONS & COMPLAINT + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +PLAINTIFF +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +vs. + +DEFENDANT(S) +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually +et-al., + +TO: Scott Rothstein, Register #91256-004 +c/o FDC, Miami +Federal Detention Center +33 NE 4th Street +Miami, FL. 33132 + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT GIVING 9 +09 DEC 14 PM 4:00 PM +FEB + +PURSUANT TO THE REQUEST OF: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., WHOSE OFFICE IS LOCATED AT: +303 BANYAN BLVD., SUITE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL. 33401 + +I, CARLOS AGUIRRE C.P.S. # 810 RECEIVED THIS PROCESS ON: 12/9/09 @ 8:00am +AND SERVED THE SAME ON: 12/9/09 @ 8:45am IN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. + +( X ) INDIVIDUAL SERVICE: BY SERVING THE PERSON NAMED HEREIN A COPY OF THE AMENDED +SUMMONS COMPLAINT, PETITION OR INITIAL PLEADING. + +COMMENTS: DESCRIPTION OF PERSON SERVED: [REDACTED] MALE, 47 YEARS OLD, ABOUT 5"7 +ABOUT 200 lbs., GREY SHORT HAIR. + +I ACKNOWLEDGE, THAT I AM A CERTIFIED PROCESS SERVER IN THE CIRCUIT IN WHICH THIS +PROCESS WAS SERVED AND THAT I HAVE NO INTEREST IN THIS MATTER. + +UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I READ THE FOREGOING VERIFIED RETURN OF +SERVICE AND THE FACTS STATED IN IT ARE TRUE. + +![]()IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +AMENDED SUMMONS + +(Have not attempted to serve – Amended only as to Place of Service) + +PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): + +Scott Rothstein, Register #91256-004 +c/o FDC, Miami +Federal Detention Center +33 NE 4th Street +Miami, FL 33132 + +IMPORTANT + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT PROCESS / BPROC +FILED +2009 DEC - 8 PM 2: 44 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, Florida +33402-4667 + +vs. Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +AAAC-C) I TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: YOU E COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +CO'S + +DATED ON December 8. 2009 + +( r (SEAL) + +2009 + +O (S- + +(See Reverse Side) (Vease al reves) (Voir de L'autre cote de) + +![](_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg) + +SHARON R. BOCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +BY: + +EDNA + +vs. +Case No: + +### IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a40efe367b31deea508da5c0e4cb242aa58fd8f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/EFTA02759330.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5985, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.58, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.34500000000003, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.51500000000004, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.51500000000004, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 203.34500000000003, + 90.72 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.864, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.51199999999994, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.51199999999994, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 288.864, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.23200000000003, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 236.23200000000003, + 317.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.076, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 438.80400000000003, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 438.80400000000003, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 167.076, + 358.83 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 482.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.392, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.392, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 130.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 392.04 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759330" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72e6a5dc4f76f672e6957cec831a5b4f0ff7a40e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759330/_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:03af0cb8f6da4690325bf93249a4ccb15736ee2211d7a544613ffebea299f98b +size 23217 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c9e28b6ee0051f453529903b729e5f82788f01c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.md @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFEN O J. EDWARD?) + +Defendant, J. ly, by and through his undersigned attorneys files his Answer and Counterclaim to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled matter on December 7, 2009 as follows: + +C + +O + +rn c, + +ria" -0 10 4r + +#### ANSWER + +### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +- 1. Defendant, Ella, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 and demands strict proof thereof. + - 2. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. + - 3. Defendant, la admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. + - 4. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. + +5. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof + +6. Defendant, admits that he is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida, otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof + +7. Defendant, admits that Defendant,. is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida represented by RRA and EDWARtIS in a civil lawsuit against Epstein, and is now represented by but no longer represented by RRA. Otherwise A Defendant, , denies the balance opc allegations contained in Paragraph 7 including but not limited to the allegation that L.M. was ey,or represented by ROTIISTEIN and demands strict proof thereof. + +8. Defendant, , admits that non-party RRA was a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a principal address of 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 it conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach County, Flood' ; however, RRA never filed a lawsuit on behalf of L.M., nor did it file lawsuits on behalf of other victims against EPSTEIN. Those lawsuits were filed by prior to any association with or knowledge of RRA. Otherwise Defendant, , denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof thereof. + +9. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof + +10. Defendant, admits that RRA held itself out as legitimately 4ttd properly engaging in the practice of law, otherwise Defendant, is withoyt knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations contained in Paraghlph 10 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +I I. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and thereby deniesj2 d ons and demands strict proof thereof + +12. Defendant, , is wit ledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 and proof thereof. Al") 'es these allegations and demands strict + +13. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +14. \Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 14 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +16. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +17. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph + +18. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Para 18 demands strict proof thereof + +-14/ O 19. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. A + +20. Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the A allegations contained in Paragraph 20 and therebtdenies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +21. Defendant, EDWA,RDS, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph )2nd thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +22. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 22 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +23. Defendant, admits that the identity of claimants against Epstein was shielded through the use of initials. All other allegations of Paragraph 23 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof + +24. Defendant, admits that he represented claimants against Epstein on behalf of RRA. All other allegations of Paragraph 24 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof + +25. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 25 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof + +26. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 26 and ds strict proof thereof. deman + +27. Defendant, denies the allegations eon e / 61c d in Paragraph 27 and demands strict proof thereof .AACt + +28. Defendant, EMI, is wit i knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 28 ex admits the evidence against Epstein was, in fact, real. + +29. Defendant, allegations contained in P is without knowledge to either admit or deny the ph 29 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +30. fendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 30 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof + +3 I. Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 31 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +32. Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +33. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 33 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +34. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admitior deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 34 and thereby denies these alleg 'ons and demands strict proof thereof. + +35. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the ti allegations contained in Paragraph 35 except specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of unethical or illegal conduct. + +36. Defendant, =MO, adMits that he deposed three of Epstein's pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot, otherwise Defendant denies the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 36 and demands strict proof thereof + +37. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 37 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +38. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 38, except that denies that he sought to subpoena Tommy Mattola. + +39. Defendant, a, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 39 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +40. Defendant, a, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 40. + +41. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 41 and demands strict proof thereof. + +42. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (a) and (b) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, a, mt that he, Berger and Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended Epstein'deposition, otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (c). Defendant, denies the allegations contained ineragraph 42 (d) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, a, deni egations contained in Paragraph 42 (e) and ,fr demands strict proof thereof, except di(EpWARDS admits that he addressed the Court on July 31, 2009, and the best evidence Abe 2ontent of his statements is the official transcript of that proceeding. Defendant, OM. admits that he filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transf ts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, as \$15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/M The motion was reported in the press. Defendant, , admits that the motion was denied. The balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (t) are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (g) and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof Defendant, + +denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (h) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (i) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (j). Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (k) and thereby denies these allegations ay x,sai demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, , admits that they knew what it said anaThey ew the civil provisions in the agreement had no impact whatsoever on the three pending Civil Actions. The concept behind certain civil provisions in the NPA was to allow,alleged victim to resolve a civil claim with Epstein, maintain her complete privacy and anonymity and move on with her life, otherwise, Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the A balance of the allegations contained in ParagrapQ2 (I) and therefore denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (l) wands strict proof thereof + +43. Defendant, EDWARDS, is vAthout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraplagind thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +44. =In denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 44 and demands strict proo + +45. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 45 and demands strict proof thereof. + +46. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 46 and demands strict proof thereof. + +47. Defendant, a, admits that L.M. gave a sworn taped statement to the FBI and a subsequent deposition in the civil proceedings. The best evidence of the content of these statements is the transcript of each. + +48. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 48 and demands strict proof thereof. + +49. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 49 and demands strict proof thereof. + +50. Defendant, a, denies the allegations n ' in Paragraph 50 and demands strict proof thereof. + +51. Defendant, a denies the alCptions contained in Paragraph 51 and demands strict proof thereof. + +52. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 52 and demands strict proof thereof. + +53. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 53 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Count I—Violation of §§772.101. et seq.. Fla. Stat.—Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act—Against All Defendants + +; att 54. Defendant, a, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +55. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 55 and demands strict proof thereof. + +56. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 56 and demands strict proof thereof. + +57. Defendant, E, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 57 and demands strict proof thereof. + +58. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 58 and demands strict proof thereof. + +59. Defendant, denies the allegations conta Paragmph 59 and demands strict proof thereof. + +#### Count H—Florida RICO—"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act" Pursuant to &§895.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009), Against All Defendants + +60. Defendant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 55-59 as previously set forth herein. + +61. Defendant, EDWARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 61 and demands strict proof thereof + +62. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 and demands strict proof atom- if. + +r i% 7 63. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 and demands strict proof thereof + +64. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 except Defendant, admits that as of the filing of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been brought against ROTHSTEIN, otherwise + +Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 and demands strict proof thereof. + +65. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 65 and demands strict proof thereof. + +66. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 66 and demands strict proof thereof. + +67. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 67 and demands strict proof thereof. + +68. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 68 and demands strict proof thereof. + +# Count 1II—Abuse of Process—Against All Defendants + +69. Defendant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59 and 61-68 as previously set forth herein. + +70. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 70 and demands strict proof thereof. + +71. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 and demands strict proof thereof. + +727tefendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 72 and demands strict proof thereof. + +# Count fV—Fraud—Against All Defendants + +73. Defendant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68 and 70-72 as previously set forth herein. + +74. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 74 and demands strict proof thereof. + +75. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 75 and demands strict proof thereof. + +## Conspiracy to Commit Fraud—Against All Defendants + +76. Defendant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68, 70-72 and 74-75 as previously set forth herein. + +77. Defendant, denies the allegations it • in Paragraph 77 and demands strict proof thereof. + +78. Defendant, denies the alleged° contained in Paragraph 78 and demands strict proof thereof. + +79. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 79 and demands strict proof thereof. + +80. Defendant, has retained the undersigned attorneys to defend this action against him and has agreed to pay them a reasonable fee and costs. + +81. All allegations not otherwise expressly addressed are denied. + +WHEREFORE, having fully answered the claims against him, demands judgment in his favor and an award of fees and costs pursuant to the prevailing party provisions of the applicable statutes pursuant to which Epstein has brought his claims. + +# COUNTERCLAIM + +J. ( ) sues Jeffrey Epstein (EPSTEIN) and alleges: + +1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. + +2. Counter/plaintiff, is sui juris, resides in Broward County, Florida, and is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida at all times material hereto. + +3. Counter/defendant, EPSTEIN, is sui juris and is a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. + +4. EPSTEIN is a convicted felon having entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he effectively conceded his having engaged in illicit vity with a large number of female children over an extended period of time in violation orboth State and Federal criminal laws. + +5. EPSTEIN was sued civilly by f4arge number of his victims. Many of the cases against him have been settled and oth ding, as a consequence of which EPSTEIN continues to face the potential of huge eiv/judgments for both compensatory and punitive damages in favor of many victims depraved criminal exploitation of children including victims represented by =M. + +6. In the Se of overwhelming evidence of his guilt, EPSTEIN repeatedly asserted N, 7 his Fifth Amendment Right against self-incrimination and refused to answer any substantive questions regarding his sexual exploitation of his minor victims. Lacking any substantive defense to the claims against him, EPSTEIN sought to avoid his compensatory and punitive liability by employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or resolving those claims for substantially less than their just value. + +7. In some circumstances, EPSTEIN's tactics have proven successful, while other victims have thus far withstood this continued assault upon them and have persisted in the prosecution of their claims. clients are among those who continue the prosecution of their claims. + +8. While prosecuting the legitimate claims on behalf of his clients, EDWARDS has not engaged in any unethical, illegal, or improper conduct nor has taken any action inconsistent with the duty he has to vigorously represent the interests of his clients. EPSTEIN has no reasonable basis to believe otherwise. + +9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN has filed the claims herein against and client, L.M. for the sole purpose of furtjattempting to intimidate L.M., and others into abandoning or settling thNlegittmate claims for less than their just and reasonable value. + +10. EPSTEIN has in his Complaint directly alleged that was a knowing participant in a civil theft and criminal enterprise when EPSTEIN was well aware that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support such false assertions. Indeed, his Complaint is replete with speculation, conjecture, and innuendo and is entirely devoid of factual support for his spurious allegations. Indicative of his total disregard for the lack of any predicate for his claims, EP EIN has ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. + +H. EPSTEIN has ulterior motives and purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, and perverted use of process. His real purpose was to put pressure on L.M., and + +other victims by publishing what amounts to nothing more than a press release issued under the cloak of protection of the litigation privilege. + +12. As a result of EPSTEIN's wrongful conduct as alleged, [REDACTED] has suffered and will continue to suffer damages including but not limited to injury to his reputation, interference in his professional relationships, the loss of the value of his time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities, and the cost of defending against EPSTEIN's spurious and baseless claims. + +WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] demands judgment against EPSTEIN for compensatory damages, costs, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the circumstances. Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED], reserves the right to assert a claim for punitive damages upon satisfying the applicable statutory prerequisites. + +Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED], further demands trial by jury. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of December, 2009 + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman Critton Luther & Coleman 561-842-2820 Phone Attorneys for Plaintiff + +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 abAill\" West Palm Beach, FL 33401 O C .1 561-253-0154 Fax iS)49 + +#### DUPLICATE RECEIPT + +PALM BEACH CTY CIR CT JISPROD + +Receipt Number: CAMB367609 Date: 21-DEC-2009 Cashier: EMSMITH + +Payor: SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY Addr: + +Violation/Docket Description Amount + +Case: 2009CA040800 - JEFFREY EPSTEIN V SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Party: + +395.00 + +CHECK RECEIVED GENERAL ACCT -395.00 + +Total Fees: + +Total Payment: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..40150cf133a50a1338060caaf3cf912a5dc4f112 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334/EFTA02759334.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,861 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759334.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 20507, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.42999999999995, + 74.796 + ], + [ + 522.4083862304688, + 74.796 + ], + [ + 522.4083862304688, + 117.363037109375 + ], + [ + 297.42999999999995, + 117.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.473, + 462.59700000000004 + ], + [ + 322.27996826171875, + 462.59700000000004 + ], + [ + 322.27996826171875, + 477.363037109375 + ], + [ + 266.473, + 477.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 489.42600000000004 + ], + [ + 367.9051208496094, + 489.42600000000004 + ], + [ + 367.9051208496094, + 504.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 504.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count H\u2014Florida RICO\u2014\"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act\" \nPursuant to &\u00a7895.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009), Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.548, + 328.048 + ], + [ + 493.87335205078125, + 328.048 + ], + [ + 493.87335205078125, + 357.8170471191406 + ], + [ + 99.548, + 357.8170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count 1II\u2014Abuse of Process\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.069, + 384.54900000000004 + ], + [ + 431.1127014160156, + 384.54900000000004 + ], + [ + 431.1127014160156, + 401.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 162.069, + 401.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count fV\u2014Fraud\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.563, + 633.3270000000001 + ], + [ + 402.23699951171875, + 633.3270000000001 + ], + [ + 402.23699951171875, + 650.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 187.563, + 650.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conspiracy to Commit Fraud\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.283, + 218.697 + ], + [ + 433.662353515625, + 218.697 + ], + [ + 433.662353515625, + 235.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 163.283, + 235.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.228, + 632.5140000000001 + ], + [ + 346.3249816894531, + 632.5140000000001 + ], + [ + 346.3249816894531, + 649.2999877929688 + ], + [ + 245.228, + 649.2999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 108.12899999999999 + ], + [ + 346.71795654296875, + 108.12899999999999 + ], + [ + 346.71795654296875, + 123.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 123.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUPLICATE RECEIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.88999999999999, + 44.090999999999994 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 44.090999999999994 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 56.44586181640625 + ], + [ + 112.88999999999999, + 56.44586181640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759334" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6f57cc3b5f047846ce0bf42052377524be54838 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.md @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +MTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +### ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DE DLEY J. + +0.• + +Defendant, J. EDWARDS y, by and through his undersigned attorneys files his Answer and Counterc o e Complaint filed by Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled matter ber 7, 2009 as follows: + +# C) GENERA:: ALLEGATIONS + +ANSWER + +- I. Defe t, del:els the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 and demands strict efeof ender\* , adrrfcs the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. + - 3. Defendant, , adrcf.:s the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. + - 4. Defendant, , adzes the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. + +5. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 and the.:.,by denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +6. Defendant, adr'is that he is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice kw in the State of Florida, otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allege:ions contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. + +7. Defendant, adr-fts that Defendant, L.M. is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida represented by RRA and in a civil lawsuit against Epstein, and is now represented by but no longer represented by RRA. Otherwise Defendant, denies the balance cf the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 including but not limited to the allegation that L.M.,tv ever represented by ROTHSTEIN and demands strict proof thereof. + +8. Defendant, EDW tD , adr.-Lts that non-party RRA was a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a neipal address of 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401, and it conducted busf less and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach County lorida; however, RRA neve: filed a lawsuit on behalf of L.M., nor did it file lawsuits onaialf of other victims against Those lawsuits were filed by V prior to any association with or knowledge c"RRA. Otherwise Defendant, a denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof thereof. + +proof thereof. 12. Defendant, is W. t allegations contained in Paragraph 12 an\* y denies these allegations and demands strict edge to either admit or deny the + +9. Defendant, l l, is w :tout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 and the -sby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +10. Defendant, adrt-f:s that RRA held itself out as legitimately and xr,r) properly engaging in the practice of law, othrwise Defendant, is vthout ,,,\_ \-\ knowledge to either admit or deny the balame of the allegations contained iii Paragraph 10 and I il thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. I + +11. Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict ACks, / s, proof thereof. " + +13. Defendant, MI I is t\_hout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +14. E ant, is wf:hout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegationatent7iined in Paragraph 14 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. Defendant, is whout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +16. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 and t c:reby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +17. Defendant, adr- fts the allegations contained in Paragraph 47. + +18. Defendant, der::-.s the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 and demands strict proof thereof. + +19. Defendant, , is v',..thout knowledge to eithedadmiiyoorr deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 and d-ereby denies these 42 r Sons and demands strict proof thereof. + +20. Defendant, , is without hedge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 and s these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +21. Defendant, lout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragra 1 d dtt:eby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +22. De la it, is wthout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations proof the e in Paragraph 22 and tht:eby denies these allegations and demands strict + +23. Defendant, admi's that the identity of claimants against Epstein was shielded through the use of initials. All other allegations of Paragraph 23 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +24. Defendant, admits that he represented claimants against Epstein on behalf of RRA. All other allegations of Paragraph 24 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +25. Defendant, is W.thout knowledge to either admit or deny allegations contained in Paragraph 25 and tk-ereby denies these allegations and d ct proof thereof. + +26. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , den: es the allegations contained in Parigraph 26 and 14/ + +27. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , den: es the allegati (0 s ced in Paragraph 27 and \' + +28. Defendant, , is w"^4u1 k vFedge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 28 e Epstein was, in fact, real. WARDS admits the evidence against + +29. Defendant, allegations contained in Pa tph 29 and the7eby denies these allegations and demands strict t proof thereof. is Wthout knowledge to either admit or deny the + +30. s4 Itg , • ant, . is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegation con ned in Paragraph 30 and thet-eby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +31. Defendant, , is w'" tout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 31 except That specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the a - eged unethical or illegal conduct. + +32. Defendant, , is wThout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 excep: that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the 2\_ eged unethical or illegal conduct. + +33. Defendant, is wThout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 33 except that specifically dente t he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the e\_ eged unethical or illegal con et. + +34. Defendant, is Without knowledge to eitheradmit:Ofdeny the allegations contained in Paragraph 34 and the tby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +35. Defendant, /".• is wiaout w edge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 35 except engaged in or had knowledge of any of ed unethical or illegal conduct. EDWARDS specifically denies that he + +36. Defendant, EDW :1,s that he deposed three of Epstein's pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth thervIse Defendant denies the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 36 and dematict proof thereof. + +37. Defeliont, is w flout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations continec in Paragraph 37 and tln:eby denies these allegations and demands strict \ proof thereof. + +38. Defendant, , aclin:s the allegations contained in Paragraph 38, except that denies that he sought to sub-.-mena Tommy Mattola. + +39. Defendant, , is w' bout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 39 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +40. Defendant, , adrr Is the allegations contained in Paragraph 40. + +41. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 41' and + +42. Defendant, a, den: es the allegations contain in P graph 42 (a) and (b) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, a, that he, Berger and Adler (another named partner in RRA) all a'::ended Epstei on, otherwise Defendant, a denies the balance of the allegations co aragraph 42 (c). Defendant, , denies the allegations container: 42 (d) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, , denies ons contained in Paragraph 42 (e) and demands strict proof thereof, exce j14/ ARDS admits that he addressed the Court on July 31, 2009, and the best evidence o to ntent of his statements is the official transcript of that proceeding. Defendant, a, admits that he filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transf o ssets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and o \$15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 8\, - 0893-Marra. Th, motion was reported in the press. Defendant, A84 8 a , admits that the motion was deritd. The balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (f) are denied and Defendant iF;:nands strict proof thereof. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (g) and thereby denies these allegations a- d demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, + +denies the allegations contained\_. in Paragraph 42 (h) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (i) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, E.: WARDS, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (j). Defendant, , :s without knowledge to either admit or dertf the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (k) ars:: thereby denies these allegations anted proof thereof. Defendant, la adn-f.'s that they knew what it said sal'Jibe knew the civil provisions in the agreement had no inc,e.ct whatsoever on the thret pen i g Civil Actions. The concept behind certain civil provisions fn the NPA was to a civil claim with Epstein, maintain her corr;lete privacy life, otherwise, Defendant, is vithout ebb either admit or deny the balance of the allegations contained in Pang: d therefore denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (1) em 2ds strict proof thereof. strict alleged victim to resolve ty and move on with her + +43. Defendant, EDW out knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragrap 43 d ti-ereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +44. Defe ct, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 44 and demands strict proof thereof. + +45. Defendant, deees the allegations contained in Paragraph 45 and demands strict proof thereof. + +46. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 46 and demands strict proof thereof. + +47. Defendant, adrifts that L.M. gave a sworn taped statement to the FBI and a subsequent deposition in the civil ,roceedings. The best evidence of the content of these statements is the transcript of each. + +48. Defendant, der'r;s the allegations contained in Paragraph 48 and demands strict proof thereof \_ + +49. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof der 'es the allegations contained in iParagraph 49 and + +50. Defendant, denies the allegations ' ed in Paragraph 50 and demands strict proof thereof. + +51. Defendant, , der. es the ti contained in Paragraph 51 and demands strict proof thereof. + +52. Defendant, ( Sthe \eIlegations contained in Paragraph 52 and demands strict proof thereof. + +53. Defendant, EDWARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 53 and demands strict proof thereoV ---y- + +#### Count I of 44772.101, et sec., Fla. Stat.—Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act—Against All Defendants + +54. Y Defendant, adrr f ..s or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +55. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 55 and demands strict proof thereof. + +56. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 56 and demands strict proof thereof. + +57. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 57 and demands strict proof thereof. + +58. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 58 and demands strict proof thereof. + +59. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 59 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Count II—Florida RICO—“Racketee: Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act” +Pursuant to §§895.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009), Against All Defendants + +60. Defendant, [REDACTED], admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 55-59 as previously set forth herein. + +61. Defendant, EDWARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 61 and demands strict proof thereof. + +62. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 and demands strict proof thereof. + +63. Defendant, [REDACTED], denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 and demands strict proof thereof. + +64. Defendant, [REDACTED], is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 except Defendant, [REDACTED], admits that as of the filing of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been brought against ROTHSTEIN, otherwise + +Defendant, denies the balance •,-•f the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 and demands strict proof thereof + +65. Defendant, , der. .,:s the allegations contained in Paragraph 65 and demands strict proof thereof + +66. Defendant, , den es the allegations contained in Paragraph 66 and demands strict proof thereof. + +67. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 67 and demands strict proof thereof. + +68. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , dens the allega s AQed in Paragraph 68 and + +## Count III—Abuse of P.--::: s—\ <\c nst All Defendants + +69. Defendant, s or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59 and 61-68 as previousk . ierein. + +70. Defendant, EDWAV), denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 70 and demands strict proof thereo + +71. Def , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 and demands s t oo erect + +2. fendant, . denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 72 and demands strict proof thereof. + +#### Count IV—Fraud—Against All Defendants + +73. Defendant, . admf :s or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68 and 70-72 as previously set forth herein. + +74. Defendant, dens the allegations contained in Paragraph 74 and demands strict proof thereof. + +75. Defendant, denils the allegations contained in Paragraph 75 and demands strict proof thereof. + +#### Conspiracy to Commit ? raud — Against All Defendants + +76. Defendant, adn-.\*:\_s or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68, 70-72 and 74-75 as prey' cusly set forth herein. + +77. Defendant, dens the allegations contained in Paragraph 77 and demands strict proof thereof. /L + +78. Defendant, derf.,:s the allegations contained in Paragraph 78 and demands strict proof thereof. + +79. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , deni% the allegations contained in Paragraph 79 and + +80. Defendant, EDWARD\_S; has ..-tained the undersigned attorneys to defend this action against him and has \*Feed to pay ther. a reasonable fee and costs. + +81. All allegations not otherwise expressly addressed are denied. + +WHEREFORE, having fully answered the claims against him, demands judgment in is favor and an award of fees costs pursuant to the prevailing party provisions of the applicable statutes pursuant to which ET:stein has brought his claims. + +#### COUNTERCLAIM + +J. ( ) sues Jeffrey Epstein (EPSTEIN) and alleges: + +1. This is an action for damages an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. + +2. Counter/plaintiff, , is sui juris, resides in Broward County, Florida, and is an attorney licensed to practice in the Ctate of Florida at all times material hereto, + +3. Counter/defendant, EPSTEIN, is sui juris and is a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. N N\, + +4. EPSTEIN is a convicted felo - having entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he effectively conceded his having engaged in illicit sexttplTctivity with a large number of female children over an extended period oft'-le in violatiotkobo State and Federal criminal / laws. /\ \-\*/ + +5. EPSTEIN was sued civilly by aArge nttrrtber of his victims. Many of the cases against him have been settled and others Lenin pehding, as a consequence of which EPSTEIN continues to face the potential of hug& \*#11 ...1gments for both compensatory and punitive damages in favor of many victims dep:tved criminal exploitation of children including victims represented by + +6. In thp of overwhelming evidence of his guilt, EPSTEIN repeatedly asserted his Fifth , t1) Right against self-incetination and refused to answer any substantive questions g g his sexual exploitation o:t lis minor victims. Lacking any substantive \Th defense to the claims against him, EPSTEIN sought to avoid his compensatory and punitive liability by employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or resolving those claims for substantially less than their just value. + +7. In some circumstances, EPS':IN's tactics have proven successful, while other victims have thus far withstood this continued assault upon them and have persisted in the prosecution of their claims. c ents are among those who continue the prosecution of their claims. + +8. While prosecuting the legitimate claims on behalf of his clients, EDWARDS has not engaged in any unethical, illegal, or imp -e.wer conduct nor has EDWARDS taken any action inconsistent with the duty he has to vigorously represent the interests of his clients. EPSTEIN has no reasonable basis to believe otherwise. + +9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN has rf:ed the clai amst and client, L.M. for the sole purpose of f ting to intimidate L.M.,and others into abandoning or settling h' ASktn te claims for less than their just and urc< reasonable value. + +10. EPSTEIN has in his G I ectly alleged that was a knowing . II participant in a civil theft and cnrainal,enterfzise when EPSTEIN was well aware that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support such false assertions. Indeed, his Complaint is replete with specula' conjecture, and inn., endo and is entirely devoid of factual support for his spurious allegations. Indicative of his tots: disregard for the lack of any predicate for his claims, EPSTEIN has ignored the statutory re: uirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. + +11. EPSTEIN has ulterior motives and purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, and perverted use of process. His real purpose was to put pressure on L.M., and + +other victims by publishing what amounts to nothing more than a press release issued under the cloak of protection of the litigation privilege. + +12. As a result of EPSTEIN's wrongful conduct as alleged, [REDACTED] has suffered and will continue to suffer damages including but not limited to injury to his reputation, interference in his professional relationships, the loss of the value of his time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities, and the cost of defending against EPSTEIN's spurious and baseless claims. + +WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] demands judgment against EPSTEIN for compensatory damages, costs, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the circumstances. Counter/plaintiff, EDWARDS, reserves the right to assert a claim for punitive damages upon satisfying the applicable statutory prerequisites. + +Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED], further demands trial by jury. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of December, 2009 + +![]()COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +Michael J. Pike, Esq. +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 Phone +561-253-0154 Fax +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f942a46ac04040527697b12dd1e098bb0498794 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351/EFTA02759351.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,819 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759351.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 19957, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.5, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.492, + 69.746 + ], + [ + 525.525390625, + 69.746 + ], + [ + 525.525390625, + 113.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 300.492, + 113.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DE DLEY J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 330.077 + ], + [ + 440.14031982421875, + 330.077 + ], + [ + 440.14031982421875, + 346.8625183105469 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 346.8625183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C) \nGENERA:: ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.0800018310547, + 437.9365539550781 + ], + [ + 369.15667724609375, + 437.9365539550781 + ], + [ + 369.15667724609375, + 497.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 220.0800018310547, + 497.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count I of 44772.101, et sec., Fla. Stat.\u2014Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal \nPractices Act\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.303, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 515.0980224609375, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 515.0980224609375, + 573.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 78.303, + 573.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count II\u2014Florida RICO\u2014\u201cRacketee: Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act\u201d Pursuant to \u00a7\u00a7895.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009), Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.941, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 492.88399999999996, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 492.88399999999996, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 98.941, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count III\u2014Abuse of P.--::: s\u2014\\ <\\c nst All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.069, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 431.7689514160156, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 431.7689514160156, + 396.738037109375 + ], + [ + 162.069, + 396.738037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count IV\u2014Fraud\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.956, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 402.49609375, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 402.49609375, + 643.1080169677734 + ], + [ + 186.956, + 643.1080169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conspiracy to Commit ? raud \u2014 Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.462, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 431.3660888671875, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 431.3660888671875, + 229.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 161.462, + 229.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.8, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 343.3363342285156, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 343.3363342285156, + 642.3580169677734 + ], + [ + 242.8, + 642.3580169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759351" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33039c6336ae58aeca07d4e39bde65f746003393 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SC t.1T ROTHSTEIN in ividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, r + +; + +Defendants. + +\_ • + +## MOTION TO STRIKE,/ + +Defendant, L.M., individually, hereby files this Motion to Strike, and in support thereof states the following: + +1. In what can only be described as a jaw-dropping case of arrogance, delusion and conceit, and in a blatant attempt to distract the Court and gain some strategic advantage from the irrelevant alleged actions of Defendant Rothstein, all of which occurred long after EPSTEIN had sexually abused and assaulted hundreds of minor girls and which in no way undermines the overwhelming evidence against EPSTEIN, EPSTEIN has filed the instant action against L.M. (one of his victims) and others. L.M. has answered most of the Complaint and will soon seek summary judgment, but in the interim she seeks to strike certain portions of the Complaint that are redundant, immaterial, impertinent and scandalous. But first, some background — most of which the Court is already aware. + +2. EPSTEIN has invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination in every case involving his sexual abuse of minor girls in which he was asked any question. He has taken the 5th on questions as mundane as "what is your address" and as factually relevant as "Isn't it true that you engaged in sexual activity with more than 49 minor girls." In his deposition in the case of EW v. Epstein, he invoked his 5th Amendment right more than 200 times. In fact, the only relevant questions for which he did not invoke his 5th Amendment right were the questions that he refused to answer and to which he ultimately terminated and left his deposition. His deposition was taken in the case of CMA v. Epstein and he invoked the 5th on every question. His deposition was taken in the case of BB v. Epstein twice. The first time, Mr. Kuvin, seeking to confirm physical characteristics that confirm his identity and involvement in- sexual abuse of numerous girls, asked him "is it true that you have what has been described as an egg-shaped penis?" EPSTEIN immediately left that deposition without answering. After he was sanctioned for improperly terminating that deposition, he returned for his deposition in that case. Again, he invoked the 5th on nearly every question. Additionally, LM, as well as other victims, has propounded interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions to Mr. Epstein on all subjects related to his having sexually abused L.M., and many other minor females, and once again he invoked his 51° Amendment Right on every question propounded. + +3. In the face of EPSTEIN's constant and consistent avoidance of addressing questions that will directly prove the allegations of numerous complaints of sexual abuse by him against minor girls, EPSTEIN now seeks to profiteer from the alleged actions of ROTHSTEIN and distract this Court from its proper focus. Aside from the fact that this is chutzpah at its highest form,' EPSTEIN's Complaint contains a section entitled "Summary of + +I See' v. State, 126 Ga.App. 350, 190 S.E.2d 785. 785 & n. 1 (1972): Mhis expressive Yiddish word appears in modern English dictionaries as meaning "colossal effrontery" or "brazen gall" but as stated in The Joys of Yiddish by Leo Rosten, "The classic definition of 'chutzpah' is that quality enshrined in a man, who having killed his mother and father, throws himself upon the mercy of the court because he is an orphan." + +Action" that is not part of a numbered paragraph, is not specifically omitted or incorporated into any numbered paragraph of the Complaint, and otherwise constitutes a self-serving recitation of EPSTEIN's concocted theory of this case. Because this section is not incorporated into any paragraph, Plaintiff is unsure how to respond to same or if any response is necessary at all. Moreover, because the statement is scandalous and at parts redundant of other parts of the Complaint, it serves no useful purpose. As such, the Court should strike it from the Complaint. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff L.M. respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting the relief requested herein. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via email and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on December /3 , 2009. + +> affe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax + +Attorneys f Defendant L.M. rmer, No.: 914444 + +By: + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. + +Michael J. Pike, Esq. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN + +303 Banyan Blvd, Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33041 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Jack Scarola + +41114A' Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant, + +ACI1C \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b89125c6df0f1b1350c2d8bbc966c1318504a064 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367/EFTA02759367.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759367.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5071, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE,/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.225, + 357.012 + ], + [ + 399.1758117675781, + 357.012 + ], + [ + 399.1758117675781, + 372.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 261.225, + 372.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.16500000000002, + 329.613 + ], + [ + 404.621337890625, + 329.613 + ], + [ + 404.621337890625, + 345.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 243.16500000000002, + 345.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.475, + 86.726 + ], + [ + 388.45220947265625, + 86.726 + ], + [ + 388.45220947265625, + 103.4200439453125 + ], + [ + 293.475, + 103.4200439453125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759367" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef4767293f84b664b5e65f3723bc35060a59e203 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.md @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +TT ROTHSTEIN 'ndividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +O . + +c. in c.) 49 ) c, + +### DEFENDANT, L.M. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES + +Defendant, L.M., individually, hereby files her Answer to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled matter on December 7, 2009 as follows: + +#### ANSWER GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +- 1. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 and demands strict proof thereof. +- 2. Defendant, L.M. is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. +- 3. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +4. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +5. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +AA' + +6. Defendant, L.M., admits that Defendant ARDS is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to ractr law in the State of Florida, otherwise Defendant, L.M., denies the balance ce allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. + +7. Defendant, L.M., admits that see n individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida represented by Defenda W RDS who was an attorney at RRA for a short period of time during the represen therwise Defendant, L.M., denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph'7 and demands strict proof thereof. + +8. Defendant, admits that non-party RRA is a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a principal address of 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401, and it conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach County, Florida. Otherwise Defendant, L.M., denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof thereof. + +9. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant L.M. does know however that she is not a party to any criminal RICO action. + +10. Defendant, L.M., admits that RRA held itself out as legitimately and properly engaging in the practice of law. Otherwise Defendant, L.M. is without knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +11. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +12. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations ',.. contained in Paragraph 12 and therefore denies these allega ns and demands strict proof thereof. + +13. Defendant, L.M., is without kno ski( S to C9either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and therefore 41 es I ese allegations and demands strict proof <"1 thereof. + +14. Defendant, L.M., s wi but knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 1V nd therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. contained aragraph 15 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations + +16. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +17. Defendant, L.M., admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 17. + +18. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 and demands strict proof thereof. + +19. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +, - 20. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit Ibr deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 and therefore denies these allegationktand demands strict proof c thereof. + +21. Defendant, L.M., is without knowled c Acc, 2r admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 21 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. 7. + +22. Defendant, L.M., is nowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 22 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +23. Defendant, L.M., admits that the identities of the victims of sexual abuse committed by Epstein were shielded in the civil lawsuits through the use of initials. All other allegations of Paragraph 23 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +24. Defendant, L.M., admits that represented her against Epstein, and that for a small period of time he did so while an attorney with RRA. All other allegations of Paragraph 24 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +25. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 25 and thereby denies these allegations and demands Strict proof thereof. + +26. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 26 and demands strict proof thereof. + +27. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in P 4g lph 27 and demands strict proof thereof. + +proof thereof. (O 28. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 28, except that L.M. admits the ev nce against Epstein was, in fact, real, and therefore denies the remaining allegatio p\ agraph 28 and demands strict + +29. L.M., is without knowledgg,td ear admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 29 and therefore denies` tti dJlegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +30. Defendant, L.M., wi out knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 3t therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +(S e + +31. Ae0 ant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in aragraph 31 except that L.M. specifically denies that she engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct and denies ever receiving any "up front" money, and demands strict proof thereof. + +32. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 and therefore denies these allegations and demands Strict proof thereof. + +33. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 33 except that L.M. specifically denies that she engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged illegal conduct, and otherwise denies the remaining allegations of paragraph 33 and demands strict proof thereof. + +34. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 34 and therefore denies these alle, s and demands strict proof thereof. + +35. Defendant, L.M., is without kno o ither admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 35 and therefore GlIkti ese allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +.4O \* 14/ + +36. Defendant, L.M. is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 t nd r.therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +37. nt, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 37 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +38. Defendant, L.M. is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 38 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +39. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 39 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +40. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 40 and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +41. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained tri Paragraph 41 and demands strict proof thereof. + +42. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contt in Paragraph 42 (a) and (b) and demands strict proof thereof. + +43. Defendant, L.M., is without kn i rto either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 43 and therefor&jenls these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +44. Defendant, L.M., C wi iiout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 44 therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +45.÷Ont, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 45 and demands st ct proof thereof. + +46. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 46 and demands strict proof thereof. + +47. Defendant, L.M., admits that L.M. gave a sworn taped statement to the FBI and a subsequent deposition in the civil proceedings. The best evidence of the content of these statements is the transcript of each, and L.M. otherwise denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 47 and demands strict proof thereof. + +48. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 48 and demands strict proof thereof. + +49. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained demands strict proof thereof. £graph 49 and + +50. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations ed in Paragraph 50 and demands strict proof thereof. + +,f4 \ 51. Defendant, L.M., denies the \_allegations contained in Paragraph 51 and demands strict proof thereof. \* — y + +52. Defendant, L.M., d e allegations contained in Paragraph 52 and demands strict proof thereof. + +53. Defend I: 3t, L,M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 53 and demands strict( ) f reof. + +54.4efendant, L.M., admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +55. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 55 and demands strict proof thereof. + +demands strict proof thereof. 62. Defendant, L.M., e ..)n the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 and + +56. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 56 and demands strict proof thereof. + +57. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 57 and demands strict proof thereof. + +58. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 58 and demands strict proof thereof. + +59. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 59 and demands strict proof thereof. + +60. Defendant, L.M., admits or denies the all tions contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 55-59 as previously set forth herein. + +61. Defendant, L.M., denies th all % \Ayons contained in Paragraph 61 and demands strict proof thereof. + +63. Defendant, LM., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 and demands strict proof thereof. + +64. Defendant, L.M., is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 except Defendant, L.M., admits that as of the filing of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been brought against Rothstein, otherwise Defendant, L.M., denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 and demands strict proof thereof. + +65. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 65 and demands strict proof thereof. + +66. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 66 and demands strict proof thereof. + +67. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 67 and demands strict proof thereof. + +68. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 68 and demands strict proof thereof. + +69. Defendant, L.M., admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1- 53, 55-59 and 61-68 as previously set forth herein <4,\ \ V + +70. Defendant, L.M., denies t all ions contained in Paragraph 70 and demands strict proof thereof. + +71. Defendant, L.M. n es the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 and demands strict proof thereof. + +72. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 72 and demands strict'proof thereof. + +73. e endant, L.M., admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +74. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 74 and demands strict proof thereof. + +demands strict proof thereof. 78. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contain C ..) -S agraph e 78 and + +75. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 75 and demands strict proof thereof. + +76. Defendant, L.M., admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 74-75 as previously set forth herein. + +77. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 77 and demands strict proof thereof. + +79. Defendant, L.M., denies the allegatio 7c fined in Paragraph 79 and demands strict proof thereof. + +80. Defendant, L.M., has retaine to rsigned attorneys to defend this action against her and has agreed to pay the e a s nable fee and costs. + +81. All allegations not othe expressly addressed are denied. + +WHEREFORE, having fully answered the claims against her, L.M. demands judgment in her favor and an, award of fees and costs pursuant to the prevailing party provisions of the applicable statutes pursuant to which Epstein has brought his claims as well as section 57.105, Fla. Stat. + +# AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES + +Epstein is barred, estopped and/or has waived any claims asserted herein by virtue of the fact that he has invoked the 5th Amendment in response to questions posed to him in the underlying sexual abuse litigation, and has plead guilty to criminal charges based upon the same underlying facts. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on December 73 , 2009. + +> M. Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax Attorneys j r Defendant L. + +B : G"' er, Jr. No.: 914444 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike, Esq. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33041 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Defendant, + +C C \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd7caf546ee3ff79b68b8051acc2d5f4fc003b7b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371/EFTA02759371.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,554 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759371.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 14872, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.52, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT, L.M. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.06, + 366.24 + ], + [ + 495.2864990234375, + 366.24 + ], + [ + 495.2864990234375, + 381.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 147.06, + 381.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.785, + 456.9375 + ], + [ + 425.166748046875, + 456.9375 + ], + [ + 425.166748046875, + 471.5500183105469 + ], + [ + 214.785, + 471.5500183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.81, + 614.66 + ], + [ + 399.27166748046875, + 614.66 + ], + [ + 399.27166748046875, + 632.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 243.81, + 632.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.81, + 137.92399999999998 + ], + [ + 405.2564697265625, + 137.92399999999998 + ], + [ + 405.2564697265625, + 154.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 243.81, + 154.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 295.40999999999997, + 74.184 + ], + [ + 390.31884765625, + 74.184 + ], + [ + 390.31884765625, + 90.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 295.40999999999997, + 90.54998779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759371" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..317fc6bb828b5c7b81bf8b4589a1b8993bf031b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.md @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOO(MB AG + +### MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY CLERK AND CLERK'S DEFAULT + +## MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY CLERK + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rules Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(a 1.980, moves for the entry of a default by the Clerk against Defendant, SCOTT RCITNIE \it , individually, do FDC, Miami, Federal Detention Center, 33 NE 41h Street, 33132, for failure to serve any paper on the undersigned or file any paper as- r by law. In support thereof Plaintiff would show as follows: + +%XI O -T1 + +1. Plaintiff flu mplaint on December 7, 2009 and Notice of Service of Process upon SCOTT RO EIN, individually, was completed on December 9, 2009, copy of which is attached her- xhibit A. + +hat as of the date of this Motion, Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, has not served a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint, or any other papers as required by law. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves that a default be entered against the above Defendant for failure to file a responsive pleading. + +I hereby certify the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail this 31s' day of December + +2009, to all counsel listed below: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +561-686-6300 Phone + +561-383-9424 (fax) + +Counsel for Defendant, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & + +Lehrman, PL + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954-524-2820 + +954-524-2822 (fax) + +Counsel for Defendant, L.M. + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. + +Florida Bar No. 224162 + +rcrit@bclclaw.com + +MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. + +Florida Bar #617296 + +mpike@bclclaw.com + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, P.A. + +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +561-842-2820 + +Fax: 561-253-0164 + +(Attorneys for Plaintiff) + +### CLERK'S DEFAULT + +A default is entered in this action against the Defendant named in the foregoing motion for failure to serve or file any paper as required by law. + +Sharon R. Bock, Clerk of Court + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ + +Courtesy Copies: + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. and Michael J. Pike, Esq., Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, P.A., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jack Scarola, Esq., Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, c/o FDC, Miami, Federal Detention Center, 33 NE 4th Street, Miami, FL 33132 + +**VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE** + +IN THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA + +TYPE OF WRIT: AMENDED SUMMONS & COMPLAINT + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +PLAINTIFF +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +vs. + +DEFENDANT(S) +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually +et-al., + +TO: Scott Rothstein, Register #91256-004 +c/o FDC, Miami +Federal Detention Center +33 NE 4th Street +Miami, FL. 33132 + +PURSUANT TO THE REQUEST OF: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., WHOSE OFFICE IS LOCATED AT: +303 BANYAN BLVD., SUITE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL. 33401 + +I, CARLOS AGUIRRE C.P.S. # 810 RECEIVED THIS PROCESS ON: 12/9/09 @ 8:00am +AND SERVED THE SAME ON: 12/9/09 @ 8:45am IN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. + +( X ) INDIVIDUAL SERVICE: BY SERVING THE PERSON NAMED HEREIN A COPY OF THE AMENDED +SUMMONS COMPLAINT, PETITION OR INITIAL PLEADING. + +COMMENTS: DESCRIPTION OF PERSON SERVED: [REDACTED] MALE, 47 YEARS OLD, ABOUT 5"7 +ABOUT 200lbs., GREY SHORT HAIR. + +I ACKNOWLEDGE, THAT I AM A CERTIFIED PROCESS SERVER IN THE CIRCUIT IN WHICH THIS +PROCESS WAS SERVED AND THAT I HAVE NO INTEREST IN THIS MATTER. + +UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I READ THE FOREGOING VERIFIED RETURN OF +SERVICE AND THE FACTS STATED IN IT ARE TRUE. + +![]()COPY, + +![]() + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +MIT ividually, J. individually, L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +# AMENDED SUMMONS, N + +(Have not attempted to serve - Amended only as to Place of Service) + +PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON + +TO DEFENDANT(S): Scott Rothstein, Register #91256-004 c/o FDC, Miami Federal Detention Center 33 NE 4 th Street MCy.., 33132 + +IMPORTANT + +A lawsuit has btit led against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +> SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller P.O. Box 4667 West Palm Beach, Florfrie 33402-4667 + +vS. Case No: + +If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiffs Attorney" named below. + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: Yel:StRE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complai k t/Refition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +DATED ON December 8. 200 + +(SEAL) + +(See Reverse Side) (Vease al reves) (Voir de L'autre cote de) SHARON R. BOCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +BY: EpNA DEPUTY CLERK + +vs. +Case No: + +### IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une response ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9b95fbabefee7d3a60d7f3d75a5379aff3a4243 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384/EFTA02759384.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759384.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 8721, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 71.80799999999999 + ], + [ + 480.06939697265625, + 71.80799999999999 + ], + [ + 480.06939697265625, + 111.68701171875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 111.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY CLERK \nAND CLERK'S DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 275.808 + ], + [ + 427.44952392578125, + 275.808 + ], + [ + 427.44952392578125, + 303.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 303.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY CLERK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 314.976 + ], + [ + 427.44952392578125, + 314.976 + ], + [ + 427.44952392578125, + 329.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 329.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CLERK'S DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.44199999999998, + 416.46500000000003 + ], + [ + 353.27399999999994, + 416.46500000000003 + ], + [ + 353.27399999999994, + 429.505 + ], + [ + 246.44199999999998, + 429.505 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.061, + 71.079 + ], + [ + 385.445, + 71.079 + ], + [ + 385.445, + 84.96799999999999 + ], + [ + 196.061, + 84.96799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.476, + 70.26199999999999 + ], + [ + 508.1357421875, + 70.26199999999999 + ], + [ + 508.1357421875, + 127.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 289.476, + 127.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED SUMMONS, N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 304.741 + ], + [ + 393.57000732421875, + 304.741 + ], + [ + 393.57000732421875, + 319.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 319.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 117.64799999999997 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 117.64799999999997 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 132.35399999999998 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 132.35399999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 383.17299999999994 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 383.17299999999994 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 397.062 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 397.062 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 71 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759384" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcbd4e50c319018713a6d7eec4d6f5b95b943274 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, +v. + +Case No. 50 2009 CA040800XXXXXX MESAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 1.140(b)(6) and Rule 1.140(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, moves this court for an order for a more definite statement or in the alternative dismiss the Counterclaim and as grounds set forth would state: + +1. The Plaintiff in this instance has filed a multi-count Complaint against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. ██████████ and L.M. (a Plaintiff in a pending lawsuit against Epstein), arising out of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A.'s law firm implosion and the racketeering operation as set forth by the United States of America in its information against Scott Rothstein. + +2. Contrary to the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's allegations in his Counterclaim, the factual basis for the racketeering conspiracy operated by the firm, Rothstein and others, is factually set forth in other lawsuits which have been filed by investors who in part, have specifically identified Epstein cases as being part of the + +FILED +10 JAN 12 PM 4:19 +SHOWN IN LONG CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +"bait" or investment that was being sold and/or offered for sale. + +3. While the Counterclaim contains numerous allegations, there is not one cohesive element which identifies a purported cause of action which seeks to assert against Epstein. + +4. In par. 9 of the Counterclaim, alleges intimidation; in par. 11, there is an allegation that "Epstein has an ulterior motive and purposes zit exercising such illegal, improper and perverted use of process."; and in par. 12, there is reference to wrongful conduct by Epstein and alleged damages suffered by + +5. But what is the cause of action? In fact, there exist no factual basis under a recognizable claim to assert a claim on b a against Epstein. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff is merely attemp Min , bble a number of words and phrases together and call it a "Countercl • S v + +WHEREFORE, pursuant to 1.1 (e), Epstein moves this court for an order requiring the Defendant e definitely plead his purported cause of action or in the alternative dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to Rule 1.140(b)(6). Unfortunately, Epstein is not in a position to cite the deficiencies as to the cause of action because Epstein is unable to determine what cause of action purports to assert. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of January 2310: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b97e98ef4349f164275bf1933da38f3937a8f115 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390/EFTA02759390.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759390.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3771, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 492.048, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 492.048, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 332.09999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 370.1554260253906, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 370.1554260253906, + 610.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 610.3000030517578 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759390" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce3389b0f5de3a57b0a2953795e85948ca0a0e3f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, IMO individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## c, REPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT, L.M <2.,z + +rZ + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and itrbiph -his undersigned attorneys, responds to the affirmative defenses and denies each and every allegation therein, and demands strict proof thereof. Specifically, the Defendant, L.M., has failed to set forth any facts which would support an estoppel and/or waiver argument in its affirmative defense and those defenses should therefore be stricken. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the rqcing addressees on this 12th day of January , 2310: + +Esq. Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue Soutt-. Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. +Florida Bar #224162 +Michael J. Pike +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51664625ad74d523d035a03a7714bbef61fceb14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393/EFTA02759393.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759393.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1794, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.9490661621094, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.9490661621094, + 130.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 130.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c, \nREPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT, L.M <2.,z", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 240.81793212890625 + ], + [ + 513.4406127929688, + 240.81793212890625 + ], + [ + 513.4406127929688, + 321.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 321.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 371.6213684082031, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 371.6213684082031, + 484.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 484.93353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759393" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e40621d698b7c5b815e3854bde2f4db82ca2ec0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL/PROBATE +2010 JAN 14 PM 5:25 + +FILED + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +To: GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for hearing on February 9, 2010, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED] at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +**MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS** + +Pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt was made prior to the hearing on this motion to resolve this matter with opposing counsel. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 13TH day of January, 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Be h, 33401 + +(561) 842-28 + +(561) 253-01 + +By: Ro itton, Jr. Florida Bar 4162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) 14/ .1 + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Counter-Defendant's Mo udge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8018cbdfa07170dc6ce6ed6ff8be8652408385c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395/EFTA02759395.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759395.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1824, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.576, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 243.576, + 318.33 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 500.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 500.5799999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759395" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37790857810e819d182e595c2cb36e4c211286d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROT HSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING (THIS CANCELS THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 UMC HEARING ON THIS MOTION? + +- + +AScr; • 7,4 ' • 4:101". "-• %.1:0 r- rce •• • c•I --- + +To: GARY M. JR., ESQ., Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be up for hearing on January 26, 2009, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm each, Florida 33401: + +## MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +Pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt was made prior to the hearing on this motion to resolve this matter with opposing counsel. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 15th day of January , 2010. + +## BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +Robert D. Cr. on, Jr. Florida Bar 224162 Michael J. ike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Counter-Defendant's Motu torudge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0facefbeff864fcc3ae5377abdd44d37582d9073 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397/EFTA02759397.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759397.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1769, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 482.6362609863281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 482.6362609863281, + 127.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 127.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING \n(THIS CANCELS THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 UMC HEARING ON THIS MOTION?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 525.0225830078125, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 525.0225830078125, + 331.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 331.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A \nMORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.012, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 497.45697021484375, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 497.45697021484375, + 515.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 123.012, + 515.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 532.2536010742188, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 532.2536010742188, + 98.67852783203125 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 98.67852783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759397" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd3b6d76623c911cdfc74b2ec3e8e277bd7c5bec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Division: AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff(s), + +OTT ROTHSTEIN individually. + +J. individually + +and L.M. individually + +Defendant(s), + +DEFAULT + +A default is entered in the above styled cause a failure to serve a pleading at the time requi — MT ROTHSTEIN, individually for + +J e rn •:p + +DONE AND ORDERED at the Clerk' ity of West Palm Beach, this 21 day of JANUARY, 2010. + +![](_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg) + +Copies furnisee 'x' BURMAN, CRITTON,sLu TIER & COLEMAN LLP 303 BANYAN BLVD., STE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401.4349 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY C/O FCC, MIAMI FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER, 33 NE 4TH STREET MIAMI, FL 33132 GARY ESQ , 425 N. ANDREWS AVENUE, SUITE 2, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 JOHN SCAROLA , ESQ , 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 PADULA & GRANT, PLLC 365 E. PALMETTO PARK ROAD, BOCA RATON, FL 33432-50IS + +Sharon R. Bock + +Clerk & Comptroller + +By: + +KIMBEnRADLEY + +Deputy Clerk \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..161f6a1d831a6ed76a42fd1ca186ac35c2d9727c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/EFTA02759399.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1034, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.02, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 33.456 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 33.456 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 90.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 90.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759399" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b63db3b616ed87f11c280d70143f4a87bffcb893 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759399/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:581439e8122383cdb3426bb128784b8e47ed3e535a59c9bd3f65e93ccb64bafe +size 24444 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7422bc9cde0913953e9c5710f1ed3ac7b733a368 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +10 JAN 25 PM 4:21 +BANANY COUNTY CLERK +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING + +To: GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion scheduled for a hearing on January 28, 2010, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED] at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, is hereby cancelled: + +MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 25th day of January, 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. +Florida Bar #224162 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice to Judge [REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48893aa46bfa352bd168349f4f8ba3a4f25a4b6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400/EFTA02759400.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759400.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1574, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.51, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 477.972, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 477.972, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 425.952, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 425.952, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 316.71000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.176, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 324.36, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 324.36, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 121.176, + 481.95000000000005 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759400" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7e96cca80face10b9bcf15db340ba2425a793b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +2010 JAN 26 PM 2:48 +SHARON F. BOCK, CLERK +ALL M BEACH COUNTY 5 +COPY ED + +ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A +MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for a More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant's Motion is hereby ~~granted~~ denied ten days to hel an answer + +based upon struck of counsel that +The claim is solely an abuse of private claim + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 26th day of Jan, 2010 + +\_\_\_\_\_ +David F. Crow +Circuit Court Judge + +Copied furnished to: + +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 +N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy +Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL +33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 +Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..622c69af832ddc804b4db1dfd78f2cc19a9aeb7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401/EFTA02759401.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759401.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1557, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 479.80800000000005, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 479.80800000000005, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 526.3199999999999, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 526.3199999999999, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 329.66999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759401" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e541048195c21f88dcaf4adc252137e6ce5ee4ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTIISTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPAION + +To: See Service List below + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the un video of: -S 9ttorney will take the deposition via + +DEPONENT + +J. c/o Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +r rn no, -0 O zg: r-A—1r— Ca r + +DATES4IIME + +Tuesday March 23, 2010 ® 10:00 a.m. + +LOCATION OF DEPOSITION + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +upon oral exainination, before Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 3RI day of February 2010: + +M il. =, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, M, Fistos & Lehman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant + +"AI eRMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP + +03 Banyan Boulevard + +Ii illior, Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253-0164 F + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33 ; Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Pla ey Epstein + +By: + +Ro D. Critton, Jr. + +Flori Bar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..112a0d3c8903c37dde494e9b160f0262551ba182 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402/EFTA02759402.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759402.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2097, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 483.01397705078125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 483.01397705078125, + 127.85302734375 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 127.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPAION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 430.5377197265625, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 430.5377197265625, + 320.613037109375 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 320.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 362.3279724121094, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 362.3279724121094, + 86.73748779296875 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 86.73748779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759402" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7ba85056f9fdddd9920892855f5d12b77f63051 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +FILED + +FEB - 8 2010 + +OtitinVIN fa. •.n.n./. XERK & COMPTROLLE "-- + +# NOTICE OF TAKING Vc) DEPOSITION + +TO: Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +### NAME AND ADDRESS + +Jeffrey Epstein + +#### DATE AND TIME + +March 17, 2010 10 a.m. + +#### LOCATION + +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, #400 West Palm Beach, FL + +upon oral examination before Prose Court Reporting, Inc., a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition Page 2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, tit. day of February, 2010. + +> Jack ola Fl. Bar No.: 169440 ik cy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Brad + +cc: Prose Court Reporting, Inc. + +#### MICRO COPY AND SUMMATION BRIEFCASE FILE (SBF) DISC REQUESTED - AMICI SIF SBF NOT AVAILABLE + +## AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800300C.X.MBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition Page 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberget®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.corn Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire rcrit@bciclaw.com; czaguirre@bc1claw.com; jcadwell@bciclaw.com 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 S..e e West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman L4LP Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +sec \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e66a0a57246f7df1d014447e70a8438c37eb27e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404/EFTA02759404.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759404.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2595, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.2, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 528.6, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 528.6, + 118.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 304.2, + 118.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING Vc) DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.2, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 421.4820251464844, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 421.4820251464844, + 365.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 178.2, + 365.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.60000000000001, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 200.03103637695312, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 200.03103637695312, + 494.238037109375 + ], + [ + 69.60000000000001, + 494.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.20000000000002, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 327.07525634765625, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 327.07525634765625, + 493.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 226.20000000000002, + 493.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 379.2, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 450.3385314941406, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 450.3385314941406, + 493.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 379.2, + 493.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MICRO COPY AND SUMMATION BRIEFCASE FILE (SBF) DISC \nREQUESTED - AMICI SIF SBF NOT AVAILABLE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.0, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 459.44549560546875, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 459.44549560546875, + 447.6085510253906 + ], + [ + 99.0, + 447.6085510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.79999999999998, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 413.2390441894531, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 413.2390441894531, + 488.1085510253906 + ], + [ + 184.79999999999998, + 488.1085510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.4, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 348.0440368652344, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 348.0440368652344, + 160.113037109375 + ], + [ + 254.4, + 160.113037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759404" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ad0308bb725eed2eee076d8e1da0f6806729a28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009 CA 040800 HONORABLE JUDGE DAVI:fill + +JEFFREY 2PSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT RCTHSTEIN, J. , and LM, + +Defendants. + +-n r m + +## DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTIQN O I ASIDE DEFAULT + +Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("Ro AthSy "Defendant"), by and through \ #Sot undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. • . 1. 0, hereby moves to set aside the Clerk's Default entered against Defendant, and %., es asserts as follows: + +- I. On or about Decem r 2 , Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Rothstein. +- 2. Pursuant to the urt et, on or about December 14, 2009, Plaintiff caused the summons and Complaint t irserved upon Rothstein. +- 3. De t been housed at the Federal Detention Center, Miami, since December "., fendant has been pulled out of his cell many times by Bureau of Prisons staff since his incarceration to receive service of lawsuits at all hours. +- 5. To the best of Defendant's knowledge and belief, he does not recall being served with this lawsuit. If he was, in fact, properly served with this lawsuit it has been misplaced + +within the of numerous lawsuits and voluminous amount of other legal papers and has not been located. + +6. In addition, undersigned counsel was not aware that service had been made or attempted cpon Defendant. Although Defendant is not able to hand any documents to counsel at the Federal Detention Center pursuant to Bureau of Prison rules and regulations, had the undersigned had knowledge of this lawsuit, counsel would have contacted Plaint unsel to obtain a copy of same as has been done with various other suits cutrently gg against the Defendant. + +7. Defendant and undersigned counsel only recent about the lawsuit and immediately checked all Court dockets in the tri-county attempt to locate where the lawsuit was pending and the status thereof. + +8. It was only at that time, thro e line Clerk Connect docket system that counsel learned that a Motion for Defaul on or about December 31, 2009 and a Default was entered on or about January 2 0. gain, to the best of Defendant's knowledge, he was not served with a copy of the oti r Default and to date, has not seen a copy of the Motion, nor has undersigned co + +9. fen t would be extremely prejudiced if the court were to disallow the Defendants o Set Aside Default and respectfully requests this Court set aside any defaul excusable neglect. + +10. The Defendant has a viable defense to the allegations contained in the Plaintiffs Complaint. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, Scott Rothstein, respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default and setting aside the Default. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to: Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 , this ( \* day of February, 2010. + +> LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. RIK Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boule fu Suit 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3 Tel.: 954-745-5849 Fax: 954-745-3 + +By: + +. NURIK a Bar No. 272817 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..654de495659f6123a70d5de662ffefb58e48fdcf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407/EFTA02759407.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759407.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3158, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.192, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 114.738037109375 + ], + [ + 285.192, + 114.738037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTIQN O I ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 315.1132507324219 + ], + [ + 509.5933532714844, + 315.1132507324219 + ], + [ + 509.5933532714844, + 334.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 334.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.37999999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.1180725097656, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.1180725097656, + 87.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 223.37999999999997, + 87.3580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759407" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc7434fa9779311ce34f80d44d0ecbc3b6a489e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.md @@ -0,0 +1,421 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +vidually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, r -g1 + +Ci CO '11 c`3 cr -0 r + +Defendants. + +# EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTER + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ." 1.T 0(b), moves to dismiss the Counterclaim for abuse of process filed by Defendant, "), and states: J. + +- 1. On December 21, 2009, answered the Complaint filed by Epstein and asserted a Counterclaim (attached as Exhibit A). +- 2. Epstein filed a Motion for More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim as it was unclear what cause of action was attempting to assec +- 3. nuary 26, 2010, the Court entered an order (attached as Exhibit B) reflecti pon stipulation of counsel [ ], the claim is solely an abuse of process claim." +- 4. Counterclaim fails to state an action for abuse of process. Specifically, fails to allege any wrongful act or misuse of process after the initial process was issued. + +5. The crux of counterclaim is that Epstein filed the instant action "for the sole purpose of further attempting to intimidate L.M., and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value." See Counterclaim ¶9. In addition, alleges that "...Epstein has ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim." Id. ¶10. + +6. These allegations fall short of stating a cause of action for abuse of process. Florida courts have repeatedly held that the act constituting misuse of the process must occur after process was issued. See Whitney Information Network, Inc. v. Gagnon 353 F.Supp.2d 1208, 1212 (M.D. Fla. 2005) (dismissing abuse of process claim where count "merely alleges that plaintiffs filed the lawsuit for a variety of improper or unlawful purposes, and [failed) to allege any post-issuance abuse of process."); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (finding that while appellants' alleged complaint was filed for a multitude of improper purposes such as to coerce settlement of appellant's debt, appellants failed to state a cause of action for abuse of process because they failed to alleged an act which constituted misuse of the process after it was issued). + +7. Additionally, the allegation that Epstein filed the claims against to intimidate him is inapposite. In Marty v. Gresh 501 So. 2d 87, 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the court found while certain pre-process events may suggest a malicious intent, "the maliciousness or lack of foundation of the asserted cause of action itself is actually irrelevant to the tort of abuse of process." (Internal citation omitted). Moreover, the + +court noted that the facts alleged "speak to pre-process rather than post-process events, and hence fail to advance appellee's cause of action for abuse of process." Id. (Emphasis in original). See also Della-Donna v. Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (holding that plaintiff failed to state an abuse of process claim since there was no allegation of misuse of process after it was issu dd ing a lawsuit with ulterior motive of harassment does not constitute abuse of process); + +8. Equally unavailing is allegation that Epstein ignored the prior written notice requirement to initiate a civil theft claim. See Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ferre, 636 F.Supp. 970, 974-75 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (holding that defendants' allegations that plaintiffs abused process by commencing lawsuit and failing to follow procedures under Florida Public Record Act before lawsuit was commenced failed to state a claim for abuse of process "as neither involves the requisite allegation of post-issuance [abuse of process])." Nevertheless, Epstein was not required to give written notice as he did not assert a cau of action under Fla. Stat. §772.11, which requires a pre-suit written demand. + +9. Edward has failed to allege any misuse of process after the instant lawsuit was filed and served. Accordingly, has failed to state a cause of action for abuse of process and his Counterclaim must therefore be dismissed + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests the Court dismiss Defendant's, J. , Counterclaim for abuse of process and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. + +Mail to the following addressees on this 26th day of February, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Counsel to Scott Rothstein +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556F + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()Robert D. Critton, Jr. +Florida Bar #224162 +Michael J. Pike +Florida Bar #617296 + +*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)* + +12/21 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANT. + +██████ J. ██████ + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, individually, by and through his undersigned attorneys files his Answer and Counterclaim to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled matter on December 7, 2009 as follows: + +ANSWER + +GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +1. Defendant, ██████, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 and demands strict proof thereof. + +2. Defendant, ██████, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. + +3. Defendant, ██████, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. + +4. Defendant, ██████, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. + +![](_page_4_Picture_129.jpeg) + +12/21 + 20 = 1/10/09 + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 2 of 16 + +5. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph S and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +6. Defendant, admits that he is an individual residing in Bro County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida, otherwise parat t, l l, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. + +7. Defendant, admits that Defendant, L.M. is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida represented by RRA and EDWARDS in a civil lawsuit against Epstein, and is now represented by but no longer represented by RRA. Otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 including but not limited to the allegation that L.M. was ever represented by ROTHSTEIN and demands strict proof thereof. + +S. Defendant, M., admits that non-party RRA was a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a principal address of 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401, and it conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach County, Florida; however, RRA never filed a lawsuit on behalf of L.M., nor did it file lawsuits on behalf of other victims against EPSTEIN. Those lawsuits were filed by prior to any association with or knowledge of RRA. Otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 3 of 16 + +9. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +10. Defendant, admits that RRA held gitimately and properly engaging in the practice of law, otherwise Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +11. Defendant, MM, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and thereby denies tions and demands strict proof thereof. + +12. Defendant, is wi t ka e to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 y aies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +13. Defendant, without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +14. .- Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 14 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. Defendant, IMM, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epsteinv.R.OntebtAnswerandaiwiterclahuof Pagt4016 + +16. Defendant, a is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +17. Defendant, a, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 17: + +18. Defendant, a denies the allegations contained in Paragr Qand demands strict proof thereof. + +19. Defendant, a, is without knowledge to either the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 and thereby denies these all and demands strict proof thereof. + +20. Defendant, a, is without kno egige 'their admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +21. Defendant, a is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 21 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +22. Deft t, a is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations co aragraph 22 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof t + +efendant, a, admits that the identity of claimants against Epstein was shielded through the use of initials. All other allegations of Paragraph 23 arc denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rninstetry Answer and Counterclaim of Edwards Page 5 of 16 + +24. Defendant, el= admits that he represented claimants against Epstein on behalf of ARA. MI other allegations of Paragraph 24 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +25. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or den allegations contained in Paragraph 25 and thereby denies these allegations and proof thereof. + +26. Defendant, IMINE denies the allegations contained i attgraph 26 and demands strict proof thereof. + +27. Defendant, denies the allegatse ed in Paragraph 27 and demands strict proof thereof. + +28. Defendant, MM. is wiklickn edge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 28 t admits the evidence against Epstein was, in fact, real. + +29. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in 29 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +30. cadent, MIS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the alleged° iricd hi Paragraph 30 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof th of. + +31. Defendant, a is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 31 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer andCoonterelelmof Page 6 of 16 + +32. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct + +33. Defendant, S is without knowledge to either admit or d allegations contained in Paragraph 33 except that specifically deni engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal coed t. + +34. Defendant, a, is without knowledge to ei adititor deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 34 and thereby denies these l s and demands strict proof thereof. + +35. Defendant, a is without ge To either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 35 except S specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of thaleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +36. Defendant, a admits that he deposed three of Epstein's pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot, otherwise Defendant denies the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 36 and demands strict proof thereof. + +37. Defendant, la is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained hiParagraph 37 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +38. Defendant, la admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 38, except that denies that he sought to subpoena Tommy Mattola. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 7 of 16 + +39. Defendant, S is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 39 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +40. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragra + +41. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Para demands strict proof thereof. + +42. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (a) and (b) and demands strict proof thereof Defendant, admits that he, Berger and Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended Epstein's deposition, otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (c). Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (d) and demands strict proof thereof Defendant, a denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (e) and demands strict proof thereof, except that admits that he addressed the Court on July 31, 2009, and the best evidence of the content of his statements is the official transcript of that proceeding. Defendant, BDWARDS, admits that he filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a SI 5 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 0S-CV-80893-Marne. The motion was reported in the press. Defendant, =IIM. admits that the motion was denied. The balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (f) are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (g) and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 8 of 16 + +denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (h) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (i) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (j). Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (k) and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, admits that they knew what it said and they knew the civil provisions in the agreement bad no impact whatsoever on the three pending Civil Actions. The concept behind certain civil provisions in the NPA was to allowan alleged victim to resolve a civil claim with Epstein, maintain her complete privacy and anonymity and move on with her life, otherwise, Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (1) and therefore denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (I) and demands strict proof thereof. + +43. Defendant, EDWARD\$, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 43 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +44. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 44 and demands strict proof thereof. + +45. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 45 and demands strict proof thereof. + +46. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 46 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 9 of 16 + +47. Defendant, a, admits that L.M. gave a sworn taped statement to the FBI and a subsequent deposition in the civil proceedings. The best evidence of the content of these statements is the transcript of each. + +48. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 48 and demands strict proof thereof. + +49. Defendant, a denies the allegations contained in Paragraph.49 and demands strict proof thereof. + +50. Defendant, a, denies the allegationas9 Paragraph 50 and demands strict proof thereof. + +51. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof denies the \\tained ks in Paragraph 51 and + +52. Defendant, a, date sliegations contained in Paragraph 52 and demands strict proof thereof. + +53. Defendant, demands strict proof the ,)denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 53 and + +# Count 1— (SST 'on 44772.101. et seo., Fla. Stat.—Florida Civil Remedies for Crintipj Practices Act—Against All Defendants + +endant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +55. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 55 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 10 of 16 + +56. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 56 and demands strict proof thereof. + +51. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 57 and demands strict proof thereof. + +58. Defendant, a denies the allegations contained in Par demands strict proof thereof. + +59. Defendant, denies the allegations conta ct In ph 59 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Count 11—Florida fliCO.--"Racketeer Influenced mid t Orranization Act" Pursuant to 43§895.01. et seq.. Ma, Stat. Anainst All Defendants + +60. Defendant, a, admit \,the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 55-59 as previously set forth + +61. Defendant, deities the allegations contained in Paragraph 61 and demands strict proof thereof. + +62. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 and demands strict proof thereof. + +a oof thereof. 63. g/Want, a denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 and demands stri + +64. Defendant, a, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 except Defendant, la admits that as of the filing of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been brought against ROTHSTEIN, otherwise + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Pap 11 of 16 + +Defendant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 and demands strict proof thereof. + +65. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 65 demands strict proof thereof. + +66. Defendant, la denies the allegations contained in P demands stria proof thereof. + +67. Defendant, denies the allegations co ' in aph 67 and demands strict proof thereof. + +68. Defendant, denies the all in Paragraph 68 and demands strict proof thereof. + +# Count III—Abuse of Proct-A AllDefendiens + +69. Defendant, adteits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59 and 61-68 as previously set forth herein. , + +70. Defendant, EDWARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 70 and demands strict proof thereof. + +71. Defendant, la denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 and demands std thereof. + +endant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 72 and demands strict proof thereof. + +# Count 1V—Fraud—Azainsl All Defendants + +73. Defendant, =MI, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68 and 70-72 as previously set forth herein. + +demands strict proof thereof. 75. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 75A e + +# Conspiracy to Commit Fraud—Aaainst AllDefendants + +76. Defendant, a admits or denies the allegations 1-53, 55-59, 61-68, 70-72 and 74-75 as previously set forth herein. C)H4Swagraphs + +77. Defendant, a, denies the allegations Paragraph 77 and demands strict proof thereof. + +78. Defendant, a, denies the 0 Zntained in Paragraph 78 and demands strict proof thereof. + +79. Defendant, a, d ja egations contained in Paragraph 79 and demands strict proof thereof. + +80. Defendant, has retained the undersigned attorneys to defend this action against him and has agreed to pay them a reasonable fee and costs. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 12 of 16 + +74. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 74 and demands strict proof thereof. + +81. All egations not otherwise expressly addressed are denied. + +WIIEREPQ eying fully answered the claims against him, demands judgment vor and an award of fees and costs pursuant to the prevailing party provisions of the app "cable statutes pursuant to which Epstein has brought his claims. + +# COUNTERCLAIM + +J. (a) sues Jeffrey Epstein (EPSTEIN) and alleges: + +Epadny.Rodinein:knutrandCounWrchWlof hgel3c416 + +- 1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. +- 2. Counter/plaintiff, is sui juris, resides in Broward County, Florida, and is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida at all times material hereto. + - - +- 3. Counter/defendan; EPSTEIN, is sui juris and is a resident of Pahn Beach County, Florida. +- 4. EPSTEIN is a convicted felon having entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he effectively conceded his having engaged in illicit sexual activity with a large number of female children over an extended period of time in viol State and Federal criminal laws. +- 5. EPSTEIN was sued civilly by \ n ber of his victims. Many of the cases against him have been settled and others a pending, as a consequence of which EPSTEIN continues to face the potential of huge civil judgments for both compensatory and punitive damages in favor of many victims of his depraved criminal exploitation of children including victims represented by +- 6. In the face of overwhelming evidence of his guilt, EPSTEIN repeatedly asserted , his Fifth Amendment Right against self-incrimination and refined to answer any substantive questions regarding his sexual exploitation of his minor victims. Lacking any substantive defense to the claims against him, EPSTEIN sought to avoid his compensatory and punitive liability by employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or resolving those claims for substantially less than their just value. + +Epueinv.flamhstein:AnsweramiCounpucklinlof Page 14 of 16 + +7. In some circumstances, EPSTEIN's tactics have proven successful, while other victims have thus far withstood this continued assault upon them and have persisted in the prosecution of their claims. clients are among those who continue the prosecution of their claims. + +8. While prosecuting the legitimate claims on behalf of his clients, EDWARDS has not engaged in any unethical, illegal, or improper conduct nor has EDWARD\$ taken any action inconsistent with the duty he has to vigorously represent the interests of his clients. EPSTEIN has no reasonable basis to believe otherwise. + +9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN has filed the claims herein against and client, L.M. for the sole purpose of further attempting to intimidate L.M., and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value. + +10. EPSTEIN has in his Complaint directly alleged that was a knowing participant in a civil theft and criminal enterprise when EPSTEIN was well aware that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support such false assertions. Indeed, his Complaint is replete with speculation, conjecture, and innuendo and is entirety devoid of factual support for his spurious allegations. Indicative of his total disregard for the lack of any predicate for his claims, EPSTEIN has ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. + +11. EPSTEIN has ulterior motives and purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, and perverted use of process. His real purpose was to put pressure on L.M., and + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of [REDACTED] +Page 15 of 16 + +other victims by publishing what amounts to nothing more than a press release issued under the cloak of protection of the litigation privilege. + +12. As a result of EPSTEIN's wrongful conduct as alleged, [REDACTED] has suffered and will continue to suffer damages including but not limited to injury to his reputation, interference in his professional relationships, the loss of the value of his time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities, and the cost of defending against EPSTEIN's spurious and baseless claims. + +WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] demands judgment against EPSTEIN for compensatory damages, costs, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the circumstances. Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED] reserves the right to assert a claim for punitive damages upon satisfying the applicable statutory prerequisites. + +Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED] further demands trial by jury. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of December, 2009 + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of [REDACTED] +Page 16 of 16 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +Michael J. Pike, Esq. +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 Phone +561-253-0154 Fax +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Clv. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ividually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXUMB AG + +## ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for a More Definite Statemerit/Nand Motion to Dismiss, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant's Motion is hereby valltEctif denied -leg dar 7b -Wk. a-r a,wwe'L2 mi o3-hp a-LA,' rot eiziatte. puLew; • + +E AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courth e, West Palm Beach, Flo r' ay of 7. 2/4 , 2010 + +> David F. Circuit Court Ju ge OW + +Copied furnished to: GARY M. JR., ESQ., Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews venue, Suite 2,Fort auderdale, FL 3330 , SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach FL 33401-5012 + +EXHIBIT f \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a8af756ac71971469592ed2073fda16e9338acc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/EFTA02759410.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1126 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 21, + "chars": 27974, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.3, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_129.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.375, + 83.4375 + ], + [ + 545.4568481445312, + 83.4375 + ], + [ + 545.4568481445312, + 123.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.375, + 123.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.0, + 310.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 496.65000000000003, + 310.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 496.65000000000003, + 327.6 + ], + [ + 129.0, + 327.6 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.71000000000004, + 137.92399999999998 + ], + [ + 380.54999999999995, + 137.92399999999998 + ], + [ + 380.54999999999995, + 151.38 + ], + [ + 256.71000000000004, + 151.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.53499999999997, + 116.76 + ], + [ + 514.065, + 116.76 + ], + [ + 514.065, + 155.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 311.53499999999997, + 155.39999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANT.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.48500000000001, + 348.59999999999997 + ], + [ + 374.09999999999997, + 348.59999999999997 + ], + [ + 374.09999999999997, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 124.48500000000001, + 362.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.445, + 460.32 + ], + [ + 334.11, + 460.32 + ], + [ + 334.11, + 472.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 284.445, + 472.08000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.81, + 483.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 374.745, + 483.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 374.745, + 496.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 243.81, + 496.43999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count 1\u2014 (SST 'on 44772.101. et seo., Fla. Stat.\u2014Florida Civil Remedies for Crintipj \nPractices Act\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.78, + 515.2631225585938 + ], + [ + 506.1471862792969, + 515.2631225585938 + ], + [ + 506.1471862792969, + 573.7240600585938 + ], + [ + 105.78, + 573.7240600585938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count III\u2014Abuse of Proct-A AllDefendiens", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.76, + 402.83899999999994 + ], + [ + 432.3538818359375, + 402.83899999999994 + ], + [ + 432.3538818359375, + 418.84405517578125 + ], + [ + 185.76, + 418.84405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count 1V\u2014Fraud\u2014Azainsl All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.33500000000004, + 624.863 + ], + [ + 405.58416748046875, + 624.863 + ], + [ + 405.58416748046875, + 640.1040649414062 + ], + [ + 208.33500000000004, + 640.1040649414062 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conspiracy to Commit Fraud\u2014Aaainst AllDefendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.33999999999997, + 253.98199999999997 + ], + [ + 435.775634765625, + 253.98199999999997 + ], + [ + 435.775634765625, + 269.60406494140625 + ], + [ + 188.33999999999997, + 269.60406494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.87, + 622.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 352.1700000000001, + 622.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 352.1700000000001, + 637.8440551757812 + ], + [ + 261.87, + 637.8440551757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.74, + 166.32000000000002 + ], + [ + 350.88, + 166.32000000000002 + ], + [ + 350.88, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 265.74, + 181.44 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.315, + 122.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 493.3547668457031, + 122.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 493.3547668457031, + 177.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 288.315, + 177.3170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A \nMORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.745, + 341.88 + ], + [ + 535.362548828125, + 341.88 + ], + [ + 535.362548828125, + 370.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 116.745, + 370.4470520019531 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759410" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/_page_4_Picture_129.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/_page_4_Picture_129.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9d4e0c406e1c3886bc2fb67b4e27e9f865cb24a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759410/_page_4_Picture_129.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d13836753c52482ca08a6a05bf154bde3369dc8601ee3e9453a35b2669a97112 +size 7280 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bce37e4bace47037ba90b25fd449432e0d7d0ef1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. + +Plaintiff, + +TI ividually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, • M - + +7A I%) its r" s cn + +Defendants. - + +## NOTICE OF HEARING " e3g-c. ad. - + +AN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark p. Nurik,110,1rr gag Broward I Suite 700, F erdale, FL 33301 jGARY M. FAIR, JR., ESQ., Suite Weissing, 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Austrai!an Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for hearing on March 9, 2013, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courhouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +## DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +Pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt was made prior to the hearing on this motior to resolve this matter with opposing counsel. + +!HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail io the above addressee, this 26th day of February , 2010. + +## BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-28 + +(561) 253 4 Fax + +By: ert D. Critton, Jr. lorida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Defendant Rothstein's Motipn Mudge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4d90be0000956e6944a4e0c5567e76d1f8e788f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431/EFTA02759431.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759431.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1690, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.608, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 481.8857421875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 481.8857421875, + 127.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 127.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING \" e3g-c. ad. -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 302.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 463.2193603515625, + 302.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 463.2193603515625, + 323.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 323.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE \nDEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 487.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 468.70806884765625, + 487.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 468.70806884765625, + 515.3135375976562 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 515.3135375976562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.6212768554688, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.6212768554688, + 99.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 99.16998291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759431" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..178d82234232eec6440983398fc300d1b85e7b70 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTF ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF H A , + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED tl% t ersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 2, 2010 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +C.) + +JUDGE: Hon. David ow 3 Cr + +PLACE: Palt 1 ach ty Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL oun + +ROOM #: + +## SPECIFICIaNTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion for Default + +- NJ rl + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +Epstien v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22ND day of February, 2010. + +![]()Epstien v. et al Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire rcrit@bciclaw.com; czaguirre@bcIclaw.com; jcadwell@bciclaw.com Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4647163fd599e925799a1a01911d34ccc95910e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433/EFTA02759433.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759433.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 1777, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF H A ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 365.238037109375 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 365.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFICIaNTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 274.87847900390625, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 274.87847900390625, + 584.9780120849609 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 584.9780120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 346.4869079589844, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 346.4869079589844, + 147.363037109375 + ], + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 147.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759433" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0005c1d42477d0f4a278e0574d569c177546437 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**MOTION FOR DEFAULT** + +FILED +2010 MAR - 1 PM 3: 27 +SHARON R. BOGH, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. Edwards, moves for an entry of a Default by the Clerk against Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for failure to serve his Answer to the Counterclaim in this matter pursuant to Court Order dated 1/26/10, DE#19. + +DATED this 22nd day of February, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant, [REDACTED] + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**DEFAULT** + +A Default is entered in this action against the named Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in this matter for failure to serve or file any paper as required by law, i.e., failure to file an Answer to Counterclaim pursuant to Court Order entered 1/26/10, DE#19. + +\_\_\_\_\_ +As Clerk of the Court + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ +As Deputy Clerk \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34bd55bdfcdecfe6c2339708453111df66efe0ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436/EFTA02759436.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759436.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1601, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.94, + 88.835 + ], + [ + 528.768, + 88.835 + ], + [ + 528.768, + 131.215 + ], + [ + 302.94, + 131.215 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.44, + 352.89500000000004 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 352.89500000000004 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 366.75 + ], + [ + 226.44, + 366.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 381.072 + ], + [ + 328.644, + 381.072 + ], + [ + 328.644, + 394.12799999999993 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 394.12799999999993 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759436" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69d901dad8449ceb724f788150529b482375780a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.md @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS +AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS + +Defendant, Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. ██████, moves this Honorable Court to strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss EDWARD'S Counterclaim and in support would show that Plaintiff previously moved to dismiss the Counterclaim, the motion was denied by written Order attached, and Plaintiff was expressly ordered to file an Answer to the Counterclaim within 10 days of January 26, 2010. Plaintiff has ignored this Court's order, has failed to answer and has instead filed a second Motion to Dismiss. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss should be stricken and sanctions should be imposed against the Plaintiff including but not limited to an imposition of costs and fees. + +FILED +2010 MAR - 2 PM 3:45 +SHARON R. 3306, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, LL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss and Impose Sanctions + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list,a day of March, 2010. + +\z\* + +Jac a + +F Bar No.: 169440 + +y Denney Scarola B Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes + +West Palm Beach, Flgri + +Phone: (561) 686 + +Fax: (561 3- + +Attorney for t/Counterplaintiff, + +BRADLE + +**Epstein v. Rothstein, et al** +**Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG** +Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss and Impose Sanctions + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +rcrit@bclclaw.com; +czaguirre@bclclaw.com; +jcadwell@bclclaw.com +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, et al +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-524-2820 +Fax: 954-524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A +MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for a More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant's Motion is hereby granted denied ten days to file an answer + +based upon struck of counsel that +The claim is solely an abuse of prior claim + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 26th day of Jun, 2010 + +David F. Crow +Circuit Court Judge + +Copied furnished to: +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 +N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy +Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL +33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 +Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ec9f12c9f377ca8da6ab1a4ab4193655ea8ffb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438/EFTA02759438.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759438.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4102, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.94, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.1560000000001, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.1560000000001, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 302.94, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.42, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 424.116, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 424.116, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.20399999999998, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 347.00399999999996, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 347.00399999999996, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.20399999999998, + 137.70000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 162.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 514.08, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 514.08, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 354.78000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759438" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f86c77d8a915e64f7daaf23fbc735e74297769e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EFSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**RE-NOTICE OF HEARING** + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +**DATE:** March 4, 2010 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Hon. David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion for Default + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +SHANGH R. B. B. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT 3 + +FILED +2010 MAR - 2 +8:45 AM 3:46 + +FILED + +Epstien v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1st day of March, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff, +[REDACTED] + +Epstien v. et al Casc No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire rcrit@bciclaw.com; czaguirre®bclelaw.com; jcadwell@bciclaw.com Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +A S' IiCrIly + +phil + +4)4 + +A \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ebe35fbf652c4c3780e473882ca41294eefe612 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442/EFTA02759442.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759442.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2367, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.12, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.104, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 301.104, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 372.096, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 372.096, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 582.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.58795166015625, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.58795166015625, + 147.92498779296875 + ], + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 147.92498779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759442" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81ab0c9f5d82fbf8f76e8c0caa59bf0d5312fea5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.md @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** + +FILED +2010 MAR - 2 PM +SHARON R. SOON, LLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL CIRCUIT + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** March 4, 2010 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Hon. David F. Crow + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, +FL + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss and to Impose Sanctions + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to +resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +Epstien v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this [Signature] day of March, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff, +[REDACTED] + +Epstein v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Coldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +rcrit@bclclaw.com; +czaguirre@bclclaw.com; +jcadwell@bclclaw.com +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, et al +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-524-2820 +Fax: 954-524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff078008bbb372f17e6aa221ed8c6dd93fc3eb6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445/EFTA02759445.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759445.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2799, + "elapsed_seconds": 110.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 363.52799999999996, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 377.46000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 609.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 346.392, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 346.392, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759445" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..decb8f61ca53b33657edcb1d546ce481f08d79b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUI- IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE KC: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually. + +J. and L.M., individually, , individually, + +Defendants. + +— n :crn Cri + +## L.M.'s CROSS-NOTICE C: TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that wiiI take the deposition by oral examination, of the persons named below, at the tine, o\ te, at the hour of the place indicated: + +NAME: DATE AN::) E: + +Jeffrey Epstein March 17, 2010 @ 10:00AM + +LOCATION: + +BURMAN, CRITTON, et al. 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +upon oral examination before Prose Court Reoorting, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day urtil completed. The depositions are being taken for the purpose of discovery, `or use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the Rules of Court. + +## CERTIC/'TE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original of the above and a copy of the foregoing has been on March d 2010 via J.C. Mal and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et I. 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Be L 33401 ai a ffe, Weissing, Fstos & Lehrman, P.L. + +Attoreys for L.M. 425 K. Ardrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort \_auderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524.2820 (954) 524..2822 fax brad@pathtoIustice.com + +By: + +cc: Prose (via email) + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. BURMAN, CRITTON, et al. 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Bamha 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409c + +d!"-- - + +BRADLEY J. Florida Bar No.: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98f497dc0712fd45fbd8c2af61d1a309c80c24ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448/EFTA02759448.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759448.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1771, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL \nCIRCUI- IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.8760986328125, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.8760986328125, + 110.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 110.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M.'s CROSS-NOTICE C: TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 464.35499999999996, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 464.35499999999996, + 327.5500183105469 + ], + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 327.5500183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIC/'TE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.66, + 622.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 379.5013122558594, + 622.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 379.5013122558594, + 636.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 230.66, + 636.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.796, + 299.40599999999995 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 299.40599999999995 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 314.418 + ], + [ + 259.796, + 314.418 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759448" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a38d5fadfea6467c6f8024447f20f3bc879d08c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +2010 MAR -4 PH 4:21 +EDUC. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS +AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon Defendant, [REDACTED] MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: The Motion is granted only to the exect that the Plantoff shall file an Answer + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4th day of March, 2010. + +*within 10 days of the Order* + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al + +Order on [REDACTED] Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss and Impose Sanctions + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Counsel for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de25c381de781d6f93e99f2c9d9f91db4b1ff7b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450/EFTA02759450.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759450.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2178, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.716, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 301.716, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.164, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.164, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759450" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cec9015caccb8830524475b5cbeee1f57072c42a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## IN HE CI -ICUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEEN'.'H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN ANC FOR 'ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex I iti; ation, Fla. R. Clv. Pro.1201 + +Case No. :)0 /309CA040800XXXXMB AG + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHS7EIN';? MCA TSI SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Scott Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDG t-said Defendant's Motion is hereby .grentedt /LC& . Cft ezte, 4077 dr) + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach Cou m Beach, Florida, day of InaA--. , 2010 + +> David F. Circuit Judge + +Copied furnished to: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIX, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort ',\_auderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. JR., ESQ., , Jaffe, Weissing, MR, Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, lli, Fort Lauderdale, 33301, JACK SCA A, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..658cddeb95f8a0db28e6501b77fbb3473704566e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452/EFTA02759452.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759452.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1377, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN HE CI -ICUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEEN'.'H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nANC FOR 'ALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 74.796 + ], + [ + 484.51812744140625, + 74.796 + ], + [ + 484.51812744140625, + 132.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 132.17999267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759452" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b28f9d435da45e66a56e114ca993ee4f3491021 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Division: AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN +Plaintiff(s), + +-VS- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN +Defendant(s), + +**NOTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED** + +A motion for default was submitted against: JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +A default will **NOT BE ENTERED** by the Clerk against this defendant(s) for one or more of the following reasons: + + Clerk must have full name of Unknown Party + + Clerk must have full name of person served as to substitute service + + Clerk must have Military Status + + Original summons not filed + + Original proof of publication is required for Notice of Action + + Pleading was filed + + Insufficient Service + + Other \_\_\_\_\_ + +DONE AND ORDERED at the Clerk's Office, City of West Palm Beach, this 11 day of MARCH, 2010. + +![](_page_0_Picture_37.jpeg) + +Sharon R. Book +Clerk & Comptroller + +By: [Signature] +Deputy Clerk + +VINCENT [REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37cf4151b206c07cc80632ac48041f9bcdd93cf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/EFTA02759453.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 952, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.92, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_37.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 341.134, + 34.356 + ], + [ + 536.588, + 34.356 + ], + [ + 536.588, + 89.162 + ], + [ + 341.134, + 89.162 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.275, + 255.21599999999998 + ], + [ + 418.22299999999996, + 255.21599999999998 + ], + [ + 418.22299999999996, + 269.122 + ], + [ + 197.275, + 269.122 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759453" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/_page_0_Picture_37.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/_page_0_Picture_37.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5f836b288f12eaa71eec716d72c78d5f9a439df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759453/_page_0_Picture_37.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7b3eb14c782be42eff98ea83c8120c3e6c0d9f34c23a0c4e37cf1264f6bae858 +size 22451 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89a73091385351611c953aaaef2e7294c712efb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT R J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800)O0OMB AG + +Ong o —cr 7C rn rn O. + +NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING r-(40—minute Special p, V w \_, n .c-- + +\_2 To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, OnEasrBroward F Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. , JR., ESQ., Jaffe, Weissing, I , Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for a special set hearing for 40 minutes on April 30, 2010, at 3:30 p.m. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +## DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE D LT\* + +Purs'alfFtb Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt was made prior to the hearing on this motion to resolve this matter with opposing counsel. + +The following procedures must be noted on all specially set hearing notices in Division AG: + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Defendant st 's Motion to Judge + +G4\* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been fymished by electronic mail (e-mail) and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this tat day of March , 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +O AS + +(561) 842-2820 + +By: + +Robert D Critton, Jr. + +Florida ar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53626c0e772ac1f9f27504152939c9242f15a6ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454/EFTA02759454.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759454.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2309, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.28499999999997, + 82.467 + ], + [ + 496.1362609863281, + 82.467 + ], + [ + 496.1362609863281, + 139.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 279.28499999999997, + 139.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE \nD LT*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.74, + 528.955 + ], + [ + 482.5804443359375, + 528.955 + ], + [ + 482.5804443359375, + 558.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 136.74, + 558.4470520019531 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759454" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..615afcdf7573a4095d7abed82db90231686c4e0e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.md @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTIISTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## ANSWER TO COUNTERC + +--n r + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN)), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this his answer to the Counterclaim aiad'statets: + +- 1. Without knowledge and deny(S +- 2. +- 3. +- 4. Admit. Deny. Epstein admits t is a convicted felon having entered into a Plea Agreement + +with the State of Florida. the remaining allegations in paragraph 4, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment (N privilege.against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth - T-Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court"); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's + +claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which wo prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privileg + +5. Epstein admits he has been sued civilly by a number of u s, and admits that a number of cases have been settled and other cases remain pe ing. As to the remaining allegations of paragraph 5, Epstein asserts his Fifth ent privilege against selfincrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the ndment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Proces the Fourteenth Amendment - 'Tit would be incongruous to have different stand me the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depen n whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. \_3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court denial."). See defendant eat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil s an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incri 'nation], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +6. Epstein admits that he has asserted his 51h Amendment right against self incrimination as well as other constitutional rights. As to the remaining allegations of paragraph + +6, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4Th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to h e different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same pr ecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court." & Pr Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-I rimi lion ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to c denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting /the vilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bimging a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting / , the privilege. + +7. Epstein admits that has clients prosecuting claims against him. As to the tp remaining allegations in p dph 7, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination. S isi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Mallo v. S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to e states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court"); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific + +denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking A.... ,, affirmative relief from asserting t + +8. Epstein denies that has not engaged in any unethi , or improper conduct and further denies that has not taken action inconsi ent ith the representation of his clients. As to the remaining allegations in para , Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Mallo v. S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause ape s to states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t wou ongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privile ed,n the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state csieral court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privil a gainst Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privile uivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendan i actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not preclud rom asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +9. Epstein denies that he had filed this cause of action to intimidate anyone into abandoning and/or settling any claims that have been made against Epstein. As to the remaining + +allegations in paragraph 9, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of 'leg ased on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was ass ed to or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §I280 Effect of Failure to Der wilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of e as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. D n civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is no ud from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative v ises o not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" wh prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting iie privi1dge. + +10. The complaint Lthe best evidence of the allegations asserted by the Plaintiff, Epstein, and Epstein denieltaitemaining allegations of paragraph 10. + +11. E denies any ulterior motive, purpose or any illegal, improper or perverted use of pro rther denies the allegation regarding his "real purpose" relative to and L.M. to the remaining allegations in paragraph 11, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983)- Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a + +claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. DefendOpts in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not Preclude raasserting (Th-C \.\st the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not co itute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent ,a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +12. Deny. + +## AFFIRMATIVE4A4SES + +1. First Affirmative Defense — fails to state a cause of action for abuse of , process. has failed to allege any/Imisuse of process after the instant lawsuit was filed and served. Accordingly, has failed to state a cause of action for abuse of process and his Counterclaim must therefor\$4walismissed. + +2. Second A tive Defense — To the extent claims Epstein's lawsuit/acts are rt s in nature, the litigation privilege is an absolute immunity that covers both defa "di to , ements and other tortuous behavior during a judicial proceeding. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 15th day of March , 2010: + +404SAI + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. E Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Lehrman, PL Suite 700 425 N. Andrew Av , Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fort Laude ale L, 33301 954-745-5849 954-52 954-745-3556 Fax 954-5 fax Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein Att s efendant, L.M. + +al Fistos & + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Alan Goldberger, Esq. P.A 250 Australian Avenue South 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 1400 686-6300 C Attorneys for Defendant + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & S y, tterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 383-9424 F Co-Counsel for Defendant Jejlity Epstein + +> BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 (561) 842-2 0 (561) 253-0 + +By: + +Ro Critton, Jr. Flon a #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d294b244fab46698fb0c0118b88506d456df5fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456/EFTA02759456.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,371 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759456.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 11290, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 480.76397705078125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 480.76397705078125, + 127.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 127.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER TO COUNTERC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 394.74000000000007, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 394.74000000000007, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 319.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIRMATIVE4A4SES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.828, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 383.808837890625, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 383.808837890625, + 371.60302734375 + ], + [ + 225.828, + 371.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 362.70050048828125, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 362.70050048828125, + 151.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 151.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759456" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9b3bf86c0c84d2b64e72fcb001babc58750f69e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +10 MAR 16 PM 3:07 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**REPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES** + +Defendant, Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby denies each and every affirmative defense contained in Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Answer to Counterclaim served March 15, 2010, and demands strict proof thereof. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 16th day of March, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Scaroy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2129 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Reply to Affirmative Defenses of Jeffrey Epstein + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm 3each, FL 33401 Phone: (56:0-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm 3each, FL 33401 Phone: (56:)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + += Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Mar S. N One East Browar ouleva Fort Lauderda Phone: 954- Fax: 95 Couns L 01 9 6 tt Rothstein ik d, Suite 700 + +s A Co \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efc7b65298840855cf2ee9d1cad0f7b377bed691 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463/EFTA02759463.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759463.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1907, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.7, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 290.7, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 414.324, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 414.324, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 371.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.015380859375, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.015380859375, + 143.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 143.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759463" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22da0167c88eb27450f72ed8646c39967bb2a9ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## fl DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +r In C + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff J. by and through the undersigned Znsel, request, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Flori Rulqs of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit to inspect each of the following documents\*: + +\*\*Documents" shall include, ot be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which fat4ormation can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Docume Iso include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty (30) days of service of this request at the offices of Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +1. All documents\* upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + +a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of who as an element of damages; diessc ces are alleged + +(5) Y 2. O all prescriptions for corrective lenses issued to you within the past five + +b. damages; All invoices for attorney services and costs ( 34/It)ged as an element of \_ \ it / 2 + +c. All time records reflecting s ices rendered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; \ + +d. Every can clk c k, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kind or des 'ph eflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every expenditure by y, r on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages.? S i + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 18th day of March 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff + +![]()NOTA CERTIFIED + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +•l=, Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-745-5849 Fax: 954-745-3556 Counsel for Scott HGthstei + +cps \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..496c8f7d47ebcfd73980b9b4c2a8c80ee3cf3411 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465/EFTA02759465.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759465.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3608, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.448, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 542.4620361328125, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 542.4620361328125, + 111.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 308.448, + 111.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "fl\nDEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S \nREQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.076, + 295.919677734375 + ], + [ + 443.635009765625, + 295.919677734375 + ], + [ + 443.635009765625, + 344.85357666015625 + ], + [ + 167.076, + 344.85357666015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 352.9582824707031, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 352.9582824707031, + 84.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 84.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759465" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..329b3a69f06ff62511288accdb6244bbe8f64d95 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.md @@ -0,0 +1,530 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +11 11 ividually, J. individua1 ly, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +#### EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS + +- • C + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(c), moves for judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(b), on the Counterclaim for abuse of process filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. states: ( '), and + +### Background and Procedural Posture + +- 1. On mber 21, 2009, answered the Complaint filed by Epstein and asserted Co \ nterclaim (attached as Exhibit A). pNI filed a Motion for More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim as it was unclear what cause of action was attempting to assert. +- 3. On January 26, 2010, the Court entered an order (attached as Exhibit B) reflecting that "upon stipulation of counsel [ 1, the claim is solely an abuse of process + +45s + +claim." + +- 4. On March 15, 2010, Epstein filed his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Counterclaim (attached as Exhibit C). +- 5. fails to sufficiently plead and has no evidence to support a claim against Epstein for abuse of process. Therefore Epstein is entitled to judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, summary judgment. + +### Legal Standard + +6. In passing on a motion for judgment on the .(apleadings made by defendant, "all well pleaded material allegations of the complaint and all fair inferences to be drawn therefrom must be taken as true and the inquiry is whether the plaintiff has stated a cause of action by his complaint." See Reinhard v. Bliss 85 So. 2d 131, 133 (Fla. 1956); a v. Florida Power & Light Co., 863 So. 2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 2003) Lutz v. Protective Life Ins. Co. 951 So. 2d 884, 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). "The test we apply in this instance is the same as if defendant has made a motion to dismiss the complaint for 'failure to state a cause of action' under [Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(b)]." See Bliss 85 So. 2d at 133; Martinez, 863 So. 2d at 1205' see also Lutz, 951 So. 2d at 888 (holding that "[j]udgment on the pleadings may be granted when the moving party is clearly entitled to a judgment, as a mater of law, based solely on the content of the pleadings."). + +7. A movant is entitled to summary judgment "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, affidavits, and other materials as would be admissible in evidence on file show that there is not genuine issues as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." See Fla. R. + +Civ. P. 1.510(c). However, a defendant is entitled to summary judgment "when there is a complete absence of evidence to support the plaintiffs claims." See Laschke v. n& Williamson Tobacco Corp., 766 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), citing Noll v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40, 43-44 (Fla. 1966). + +#### Argument + +8. Epstein is entitled to judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, summary judgment on Counterclaim for abuse of process because fails to allege, and there is absolutely no evidence of, any wrongful act or misuse of process after the initial process was issued. + +9. The crux of Counterclaim is that Epstein filed the instant action "for the sole purpose of further attempting to intimidate L.M., and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value." See Counterclaim ¶9. + +10. These allegations fall short of establishing a cause of action for abuse of process. Florida courts have repeatedly held that the act constituting misuse of the process must occur after process was issued. See Whitney Information Network, Inc. v. Gagnon, 353 F.Supp.2d 1208, 1212 (M.D. Fla. 2005) (dismissing abuse of process claim where count "merely alleges that plaintiffs filed the lawsuit for a variety of improper or unlawful purposes, and [failed] to allege any post-issuance abuse of process."); McMurrav v. U-Haul Co., Inc. 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (finding that while appellants' alleged complaint was filed for a multitude of improper purposes such as to coerce settlement of appellant's debt, appellants failed to state a cause of action + +for abuse of process because they failed to alleged an act which constituted misuse of the process after it was issued). + +11. Additionally, the allegation that Epstein filed the claims against to intimidate him is inapposite. In Della-Donna v. Nova University, Inc. 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff's abuse of process claim, finding that the defendant demonstrated the nonexistence of a genuine issue of material fact since there was no alienation or evidence of any act by defendant which constituted misuse of process after it was issued. The court further noted that "filing a lawsuit with ulterior motive of harassment does not constitute abuse of process." Id. at 1056. + +12. In Marty v. Gresh, 501 So. 2d 87, 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the court reversed a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on his abuse of process claim and reasoned that while certain pre-process events may suggest a malicious intent, "the maliciousness or lack of foundation of the asserted cause of action itself is actually irrelevant to the tort of abuse of process." (Internal citation omitted). Moreover, the court noted that the facts alleged "speak to pre-process rather than post-process events, and hence fail to advance appellee's cause of action for abuse of process." Id. (Emphasis in original). The court concluded that "the trial court should have granted [defendant's] motion for a directed verdict" on plaintiff's abuse of process claim. Id. + +13. Equally unavailing is allegation that Epstein ignored the prior written notice requirement to initiate a civil theft claim. See Counterclaim ¶10. In Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ferre 636 F.Supp. 970, 974-75 (S.D. Fla. 1985), the court held + +that defendants' allegations that plaintiffs abused process by commencing lawsuit and failing to follow procedures under Florida Public Record Act before lawsuit was commenced failed to state a claim for abuse of process "as neither involves the requisite allegation of post-issuance [abuse of process)." Nevertheless, Epstein was not required to give written notice as he did not assert a cause of actio lilt Fla. Stat. §772.11, which requires a pre-suit written demand. + +14. has failed to allege and there is a comple -absence of evidence of any misuse of process after the instant lawsuit was filed and served. Accordingly, the Court must enter judgment on the pleadings o , alternatively, summary judgment in favor of Epstein of Counterclaim olici e of process. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counte - of nt, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests the Court enter judgment on the pleadings r, alternatively, summary judgment in his favor on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Counterclaim for abuse of process and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. + +#### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on thiseday of March 2010: + +S A. Farmer, Jr., Esq , Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Epstein's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on [REDACTED] Counterclaim + +Page 6 of 6 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & + +Shipley, P.A + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +686-6300 + +383-9424 F + +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +Counsel to Scott Rothstein + +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +(954) 745-5849 + +(954) 745-3556F + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +\_\_\_\_\_ +Robert D. Critton, Jr. + +Florida Bar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +(' t + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +hoot Pp! + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOP. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)000.2v1BAG + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L M., individually, + +Defendants, + +### ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEF RADLEY J. + +Defendant, J. EDWA in pdually, by and through his undersigned attorneys files his Answer and Co the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled ma ber 7, 2009 as follows: + +#### ANSWER + +#### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +- 1. Dafbndant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph I and demands strietwoofthereof . I, II ±NKN-:.LaDefendant, - S admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. '3, Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. + - 4. Defendant, S admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. + +![](_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg) + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of 11.. Rage 2 of 16 + +5. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 and thereby denies these allegations and demands skit proof thereof. + +6. Defendant, MEM admits that he is an individual residing County, Florida and. is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida, tithe dant, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph emends strict proof thereof. + +7. Defendant, IMO admits that Defer' an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida represented by RRA an in a civil lawsuit against Epstein, and is now represented by EDWARD?lest, ger represented by RRA. Otherwise Defendant, EMI denies the balm ac .....i the egations contained in Paragraph 7 including but not limited to the allegation that w ver represented by ROTHSTEIN and demands strict proof thereof. + +8. Defendant WA S, admits that non-party RRA was a Florida Professional Service Corporatio 'tit a rincipal address of 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Ft. Lauderdale, 4 t d it conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients in Palm Beach C Plo da; however, RRA never filed a lawsuit on behalf of L.M., nor did it file lawsui f of other victims against EPSTEIN. Those lawsuits were filed by prior to any association with or knowledge of RRA. Otherwise Defendant, May denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 3 of 16 + +9. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +10. Defendant, . admits that RRA held' properly engaging in the practice of law, otherwise Defendant, ut knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations con inJaragraph 10 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof then + +11. Defendant, . is without know t Ke r admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and thereby delve allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +12. Defendant, iswithout knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraphl andithereby denies these allegations and demands strict ,--- - / proof thereof. , + +\\ i 13. Defendanta, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict • • ' . . . . . proofthereoL."... + +( 44.9tfendant, S is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegeeoos contained in Paragraph 14 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. Defendant, is without knowledge to tither admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 4 of 16 + +16. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +It Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Para 7.alSv + +18. Defendant, denies the allegations contained ' 18 and demands strict proof thereof. + +19. Defendant, M, is without knowledge dmit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 and thereby denies ons and demands strict proof thereof. + +20. Defendant, is wi w ge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 andtbereby cities these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +V) , 21. Defendant, Ma st without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in aragraph-21 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +22. is without knowledge to either admit or deny the alleged din Paragraph 22 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof t + +23. Defendant, admits that the identity of claimants against Epstein was shielded tluough the use of initials. All other allegations of Paragraph 23 are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim or Page 5 of 16 + +24. Defendant, admits that he represented claimants against Epstein on behalf of RRA. All other allegations of Paragraph 24 are denied and Defendant demands 'ct proof thereof. + +25. Defendant, ME, is without knowledge to either admit oAlc tp i allegations contained in Paragraph 25 and thereby denies these allegatio strict proof thereof. + +26. Defendant, denies the allegations • in Paragraph 26 and demands strict proof thereof. + +27. Defending, demands strict proof thereof. denies the alregitti\ro contained in Paragraph 27 and + +28. Defendant, allegations contained in Paragrap Epstein was, in fact, real, ( S thou lcn owledge to either admit or deny the admits the evidence against + +29. Defend WARDS, is without knowledge to tither admit or deny the allegations cone in P graph 29 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereQ + +3fendant, IMES is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 30 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +31. Defendant, IMIM, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegation contained in Paragraph 3 t except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 6 of 16 + +32. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the Ale gations contained in Paragraph 32 except that specifically denies that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or illega ilf. \_ + +33. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit orckenyte allegations contained in Paragraph 33 except that specifically±dentes that he engaged in or had knowledge of any of the alleged unethical or ilk al cc'duef. + +34. Defendant, is without knowled allegations contained in Paragraph 34 and thereby dent proof thereof. dmit or deny the gations and demands strict + +35. Defendant, S is iewkdge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 35 tha specifically denies that lie engaged in or had knowledge of alleged unethical or illegal conduct. + +36. Defendant, ED A S, admits that he deposed three of Epstein's pilots, and sought the deposition o pilot, otherwise Defendant denies the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 36 dem s strict proof thereof. + +37. cane c ant, =M, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the elle tion fined in Paragraph 37 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof th of. + +n. Defendant, admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 38, except that denies that he sought to subpoena Tommy Mangle. + +EpmenvAtodulen:AmsmvrandOounmnOafroof Pagel of 16 + +39. Defendant, S is without knowledge to either admit or deny the n egations contained in Paragraph 39 and thereby denies these allegations and demands ict proof thereof. + +40. Defendant, =MI, admits the allegations contained in P + +41. Defendant, denies the allegations contained ' 41 and demands strict proof thereof. + +42. Defendant, denies the allegatio in Paragraph 42 (a) and (b) and demands strict proof thereof: Defendant, EDW ts that he, Berger and Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attend deposition, otherwise Defendant, denies the balance of the alle ed in Paragraph 42 (c). Defendant, , denies the allegations co amgraph 42 (d) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, EDWARD allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (e) and demands strict proof thereof, pt at admits that he addressed the Court on July 3), 2009, and the best a of the content of his statements is the official transcript of that proceeding. De ant, admits that he filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent er Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein ost a \$15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case N -CV-80893-Marna. The motion was reported in the press. Defendant, admits that the motion was denied. The balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (I) are denied and Defendant demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (g) and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Edwards Page 8 of 16 + +a denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (h) and demands strict proof theu efenda t, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (i) a life, otherwise, Defendant, a balance of the allegations contained in allegations contained in Farago demands strict proof thereof. demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, al admits the allegations conta Paragraph 42 (i). Defendant, a is without knowledge to either a dt ' or dr allegations contained in Paragraph 42 (k) and thereby denies these alleg 0 demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, a admits that they knew wh ' a they knew the civil provisions in the agreement had no impact whatsoever pending Civil Actions. The concept behind certain civil provisions in the NMt tolupdr an alleged victim to resolve a civil claim with Epstein, maintain her complete p% 61and anonymity and move on with her edge to either admit or deny the 2 (1) and therefore denies the balance of the + +43. Defendant, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in 1 ph 43 and thereby denies these allegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +44. denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 44 and c of thereof. + +4 Defendant, la denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 45 and demands strict proof thereof. + +46. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 46 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Eptehiv.RothaeimAnswerendCounterdaMaof Page9ofl6 + +47. Defendant, , admits that L.M. gave a sworn taped statement to the - — Flil and a sub neat deposition in the civil proceedings\_ The best evidence of the con f these statements is the transcript of each. + +> 48. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in PO and demands strict proof thereof. + +> 49. Defendant, denies the allegations con Perapiaph 49 and demands strict proof thereof. + +> 50. Defendant, denies the allege\ ,rained in Paragraph 50 and demands strict proof thereof. + +> 51. Defendant, , dettr e n ations contained in Paragraph 51 and demands strict proof thereof. + +> 52. Defendant, EDW demands strict proof thereof: es the allegations contained in Paragraph 52 and + +> 53. Defendan denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 53 and demands strict p ?c , + +# Qation of 66772,101. et sea.. Fla. Slat.—Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act—Against All Defendants + +54. Defendant, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 as previously set forth herein. + +55. Defendant, , denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 55 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 10 of 16 + +56. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 56 and - -demands-strict proof\_thereof, + +57. Defendant, denies the allegations contained in Paragr 7 demands strict proof thereof. + +58. Defendant, a denies the allegations contain iht Pat graph 58 and demands strict proof thereof. + +59. Defendant, a denies the allegationf for i ted in Paragraph 59 and demands strict proof thereof. + +<2 \ Count II—Florida RICO—"Racketeer Ix/Wanted and Correa OrPanization Act" Pursuant to §6895.01. et seq.. tatC2099). Against All Defendants + +60. Defendant, EDWA tsor denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53 and 55-59 as previously set fo + +61. Defendant, a denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 61 and demands strict proof the + +62. denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 and demands 10f thereof. + +efendant, EDWARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 and demands strict proof thereof. + +64. Defendant, a, is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 except Defendant, a, admits that as of the filing of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been brought against ROTHSTEIN, otherwise + +demands strict proofthereof. 68. Defendant, a, denies dons contained in Paragraph 68 and + +#### Count DI—Abu ? S' s—Against All Defendants + +69. Defendant, ED is or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs I-53, 55-59 and 61-68 as prevlll et forth herein. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Page 11 of 16 + +Defendant, a, denies the balance of the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 and demands-strict-proof\_thezzol\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ + +65. Defendant, demands strict proof thereof. , denies the allegations contained in Parag AR ,5 + +66. Defendant, a denies the allegations containet in Par ph 66 and demands strict proof thereof. + +67. Defendant, a, denies the allegatiops contained in Paragraph 67 and demands strict proof thereof. + +70. Defendanlip ARDS, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 70 and demands strict thereof. + +71. en t, =M denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 and proof thereof. + +Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 72 and demands strict proof thereof. + +#### Count W—Fraud—Against All Defendants + +73. Defendant, EDWARDS, admits or denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-53, 55-59, 61-68 and. 70-72 as previously set forth herein. + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of Edwards Page 12 of 16 + +74. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 74 and demands-striet-proofthereC + +75. Defendant, a, denies the allegations contained in Para 75 ° demands strict proof thereof. + +#### scIetney to Commit Fraud—Against ants + +76. Defendant, a, admits or denies the alle ns 1-53, 55-59, 6l.68, 70-72 and 74-75 as previously set fo c3fitaincd in Paragraphs + +demands strict proof thereof. Defendant, a denies the al in Paragraph 77 and 77. + +78. Defendant, a, der es e alit gations contained in Paragraph 78 and demands strict proof thereof. + +79. Defendant, ED , vies the allegations contained in Paragraph 79 and demands strict proof thereof. + +80. Defend has retained the undersigned attorneys to defend this action against agreed to pay them a reasonable fee and costs. + +81 egations not otherwise expressly addressed are denied. + +FORE, having fully answered the claims against him, demands judgmen m his favor and an award of fees and costs pursuant to the prevailing party provisions of the applicable statutes pursuant to which Epstein has brought his claims. + +#### CaltalERO4Thd + +J. i sues Jeffrey Epstein (EPSTEIN) and alleges: + +- which he effectively conceded his having engaged i female children over an extended period of s ti io laws. +- 5. EPSTEIN was sued against him have been settled continues to face the potential damages in favor of man victims ivies +- 1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum +- lunsdia135narlimits-of this-Geurh +- 2. Counter/plaintiff, is sui jails, resides in Broward Co Flail a, and is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida at all times +- 3. Counter/defendant, EPSTEIN, is suiYuris and is a reside in Beach County, Florida. +- 4. EPSTEIN is a convicted felon having e agreement pursuant to activity with a large number of n of both State and Federal criminal arge number of his victims. Many of the cases ain pending, as a consequence of which EPSTEIN e civil judgments for both compensatory and punitive ms ofhis depraved crintinal exploitation of children including e Ace of overwhelming evidence of his guilt, EPSTEIN repeatedly asserted his ndanent Right against self-incrimination and refused to answer any substantive questions regarding his sexual exploitation of his minor victims. Lacking any substantive defense to the claims against him, EPSTEIN sought to avoid his compensatory and punitive liability by employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or resolving those claims for substantially less than their just value. + +Epstein v. Rothstdn: Answer and Counterclaim of Pagel3of16 + +Epstein v. Rothstein:A.11MT and Counterclaim of Edwards Pip 14 of 16 + +7. In some circumstances, EPSTEIN's tactics have proven successful, while other Th Eithave-thus-fer-withstood-thissontinued assault upon them and have persisted prosecution of their claims. clients are among those who consult' rose~ition of their claims. + +> 8. While prosecuting the legitimate claims on behalf of hi client-has not engaged in any unethical, illegal, or improper conduct nor ;i s) W . S taken any action inconsistent with the duty he has to vigorously represent of iris EPSTEIN has no reasonable basis to believe otherwise. + +9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN has hi ACA,tn s herein i against and client, L.M. for the sole p se er attempting to intimidate L.M., and others into abandoning ojae ir legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value. + +10. EPSTEIN has • Complaint directly alleged that was a knowing participant in a civil th criminal enterprise when EPSTEIN was well aware that there is absolutely nonce whatsoever to support such false assertions. Indeed, his Complaint is replete Mallon, conjecture, and Innuendo and is entirely devoid of factual support for allegations. Indicative of his total disregard for the lack of any predicate for his claims, LPSTEIN hits ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. + +I I. EPSTEIN has ulterior motives and proposes in exercising such illegal, improper, and perverted use ofprocess. His real purpose was to put pressure on , L.lvt., and + +Epstein v. Rothstein:AnswerandCounterchimof P401543(16 + +other victims by publishing what amounts to nothing more than a press release issued under the cldarittprotection-of-the-litigatioa\_ + +12. As a result of EPSTEIN's wrongful conduct as alleged, EDWARD and will continue to suffer damages including but not limited to injury to his interference in his professional relationships, the loss of the value of his to be diverted from his professional responsibilities, and the cost of defyndWJ against EPSTEIN's spurious and baseless claims. + +WHEREFORE, demands judged damages, costs, and such other and further relief circumstances. Counter/plaintiff, EDW damages upon satisfying the applicab for compensatory may deem appropriate under the the right to assert a claim for punitive rerequisites. + +Counter/plaintiff', EDW1: 11 er demands trial by jury. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY c and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by AI/40t - Fax and U.S. Mail to all tit on the attached list, this -- day of December 2009 + ++6s la + +a Bar No.: 169440 cy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Defendant, + +Epstein v. Rothstein: Answer and Counterclaim of [REDACTED] +Page 16 of 16 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +Michael J. Pike, Esq. +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 Phone +561-253-0154 Fax +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A +MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for a More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant's Motion is hereby granted denied few days to file an answer based upon struck of counsel that The claim is solely an abuse of present claim + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 26th day of Jan, 2010 + +David F. Crow +Circuit Court Judge + +Copied furnished to: +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 +N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy +Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL +33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 +Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +![](_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg) + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXAMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +co + +#### WER T UNTE CL + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "E 7), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this his answer to the Counterelaitstt4tates: e + +- I. Without knowledge and den . +- 2. Admit. +- 3. Deny. +- 4. Epstein admits e is a convicted felon having entered into a Plea Agreement + +with the State of Florid:lc:Zt the remaining allegations in paragraph 4, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's + +EXHIBIT C-- + +claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 FIa.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege (against self-incrimination), because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which w vent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privile + +5. Epstein admits he has been sued civilly by a number als, and admits that a number of cases have been settled and other cases remain As to the remaining allegations of paragraph 5, Epstein asserts his Fifth nt privilege against selfincrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company`43 Sti'.\2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Affti AMendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[l]t would be incongruous to have different standardidetermine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. CivAd §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...couretniattreat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See7alito\ 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant 4vho raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrinfination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +6. Epstein admits that he has asserted his 5th Amendment right against self incrimination as well as other constitutional rights. As to the remaining allegations of paragraph + +6, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to havel'different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the samy.f prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal co . ), Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Se! -In lion ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent t c denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actio civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination), because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +7. Epstein admits that has clients prosecuting claims against him. As to the remaining allegations in ptiragraph 7, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination. §es DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4'b DCA 1983); Mgllgyieg", 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause appliesJ6 the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would N, be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. ct Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self. Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific + +denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +8. Epstein denies that has not engaged in any unetni al, or improper conduct and further denies that has not taken action inconsistent with the representation of his clients. As to the remaining allegations in paragaph 8; Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See PeLisi/v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Bogen 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t o ncongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in statLideral court."). 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ, 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Pr. Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privil g equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendgt f it actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not prec m asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +9. Epstein denies that he had filed this cause of action to intimidate anyone into abandoning and/or settling any claims that have been made against Epstein. As to the remaining allegations in paragraph 9, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination. See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins, Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41' DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendm t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim ege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was Lr ' state or federal court."). 5 Fed,Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to len yrivilege Against Self Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of^p as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. this en civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief'/ which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from assertingthe privilege. + +10. The complaint is the best evidence of the allegations asserted by the Plaintiff, Epstein, and Epstein d e remaining allegations of paragraph 10. + +11. n denies any ulterior motive, purpose or any illegal, improper or perverted use of r i t d further denies the allegation regarding his "real purpose" relative to and L. to the remaining allegations in paragraph 11, Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a + +claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of pr'vilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defe in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not pr om asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defens db titute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prej pt tiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege. + +12. Deny. + +#### AFFIRMATIVZ D NSE\$ + +1. First Affirmative Defense fails to state a cause of action for abuse of process. has failed to allege use of process after the instant lawsuit was filed and served. Accordingly, 1.111 ,7'itiled to state a cause of action for abuse of process and • his Counterclaim must therefore be-dismissed. + +2. Second Affirrhative Defense — To the extent claims Epstein's \';\ '''' lawsuit/acts are tottious in nature, the litigation privilege is an absolute immunity that covers ---- both de tory statements and other tortuous behavior during a judicial proceeding. + +#### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 15th day of March 2010: + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-745-5849 954-745-3556 Fax Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant dwards + ++0 + +S I: Fanner, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Edwirds, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822/ Fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. tterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 (561)842-2 0 (561) 253-0 + +Roe '.Critton, Jr. Flon a #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a67e7d4cde18fa6665d2374d6970e0f87ddb6a0f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/EFTA02759469.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1622 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 30, + "chars": 41733, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.28, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.536, + 70.6875 + ], + [ + 532.3418579101562, + 70.6875 + ], + [ + 532.3418579101562, + 111.1700439453125 + ], + [ + 292.536, + 111.1700439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS \nOR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON \nCOUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.07199999999999, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 475.0425109863281, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 475.0425109863281, + 341.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 126.07199999999999, + 341.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Background and Procedural Posture", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.556, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 407.3690490722656, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 407.3690490722656, + 506.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 191.556, + 506.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Legal Standard", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 347.1240234375, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 347.1240234375, + 302.42498779296875 + ], + [ + 253.97999999999996, + 302.42498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.668, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.5018310546875, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.5018310546875, + 247.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 268.668, + 247.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 361.49005126953125, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 361.49005126953125, + 522.5499877929688 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 522.5499877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOP. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.0, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 509.7361755371094, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 509.7361755371094, + 153.08905029296875 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 153.08905029296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEF RADLEY J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.056, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 489.6, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 489.6, + 361.58905029296875 + ], + [ + 115.056, + 361.58905029296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 329.97137451171875, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 329.97137451171875, + 471.46905517578125 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 471.46905517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.23200000000003, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 369.85406494140625, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 369.85406494140625, + 496.21905517578125 + ], + [ + 236.23200000000003, + 496.21905517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qation of 66772,101. et sea.. Fla. Slat.\u2014Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal \nPractices Act\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 527.1434326171875 + ], + [ + 501.07818603515625, + 527.1434326171875 + ], + [ + 501.07818603515625, + 586.7235412597656 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 586.7235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count DI\u2014Abu \n? S' \ns\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 405.4381103515625 + ], + [ + 426.3203125, + 405.4381103515625 + ], + [ + 426.3203125, + 430.7235412597656 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 430.7235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count W\u2014Fraud\u2014Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.9, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 398.9522705078125, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 398.9522705078125, + 652.7235412597656 + ], + [ + 198.9, + 652.7235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "scIetney to Commit Fraud\u2014Against ants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 431.59747314453125, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 431.59747314453125, + 283.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 283.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CaltalERO4Thd", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 637.47 + ], + [ + 348.8830261230469, + 637.47 + ], + [ + 348.8830261230469, + 651.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 651.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 191.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58000000000004, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 488.376, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 488.376, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 284.58000000000004, + 188.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.38399999999999, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 111.38399999999999, + 382.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.668, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.5675048828125, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.5675048828125, + 148.353515625 + ], + [ + 268.668, + 148.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WER T UNTE CL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.932, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 393.51599999999996, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 393.51599999999996, + 330.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 220.932, + 330.2235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIRMATIVZ D NSE$", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.1221923828125, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.1221923828125, + 380.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 380.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 359.50238037109375, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 359.50238037109375, + 168.603515625 + ], + [ + 252.14399999999998, + 168.603515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 265 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759469" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f90d057673ed1c4ee28ed4c32c1cf916e552b039 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2f93f40182822f75658ca67d2d36d567ff6f3729266f59e72ea98481ebe00960 +size 6819 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf0e309b1549584db810761000dc0c79890a7fef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759469/_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b2c2a04429abd6b36fec92de9bf6566cc9220c421e48cf1b1110b09614a4c8c +size 7952 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd64a331ea17269fedc86b28449643fd4aecb90d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.md @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +*Lp 4/17* + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, +Defendant(s). + +██████ J. ██████, +Counterplaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Counterdefendant. + +SHARON R. BUCH, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL/PARTY +2010 APR - 5 PM 4:21 + +FILED + +**NOTICE FOR JURY TRIAL** + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. ██████, pursuant to Rule 1.440 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, shows to the Court that the action is at issue and ready to be set for trial on the original action or a subsequent proceeding. It is expected that this case will take 10 days to try. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of April, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for ██████ + +stein v. Rothstein, et al + +v. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XX.XXMBAG + +ME Notice of Jury Trial + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger®agwpa.com; + +smahoney@agwpa.corn + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire + +rcrit@bciclaw.com; + +czaguirre®bciclaw.com; + +jcadwell@bc1claw.com + +Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-842-2820 + +Fax: (561)-844-6929 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissiyg, Edwards, Fistos & + +Lehrman, PL + +425 N. Andrew Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderd • 3 01 + +Phone: (95 0 + +Fax: (9 822 + +A Cos \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02d7a667bb0d1f16f4ca253907f2643e3dc645a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499/EFTA02759499.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759499.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1976, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE FOR JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 410.565 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 410.565 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 423.5730000000001 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 423.5730000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 152.844 + ], + [ + 347.0112609863281, + 152.844 + ], + [ + 347.0112609863281, + 168.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 168.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759499" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e2a809f2199df7dea247c27d7b1c70674b7163d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION + +To: See Service List below + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the deposition via video of: + +#### DEPONENT + +Scott Rothstein c/o Marc S. Nurik, Esq.. (14/ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +## TE & TIME + +dl 15, 2010 :00 a.m. + +1> : 7, CI a \_moCPC n r- z n rn =:/ r- + +## LOCATION OF DEPOSITION + +Prose Court Reporting 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1500 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +upon oral examination, before Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this L Th-day of 2010: + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. +Page 2 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq.. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq., +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 - Fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +![]()cc: Prose Court Reporting which will also provide Videographer service \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5dad095ff1c7c3b9badc89626af2f97afd9b31b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501/EFTA02759501.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759501.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2406, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 71.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 507.7287902832031, + 71.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 507.7287902832031, + 113.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 113.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.436, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 424.28887939453125, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 424.28887939453125, + 333.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 185.436, + 333.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEPONENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 414.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 140.08709716796875, + 414.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 140.08709716796875, + 428.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 428.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TE & TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 339.65716552734375, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 339.65716552734375, + 429.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 429.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 351.9, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 519.5388793945312, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 519.5388793945312, + 429.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 429.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 366.7811279296875, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 366.7811279296875, + 634.9335174560547 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 634.9335174560547 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759501" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8d74385014d4575a338d7bee50e5aad4a69c0f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXNU391G-o + +-fl e. -,7:1 J.- r.c-, a, + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT, + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, (herei s ftes p S " r. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys hereby files • N ice of Serving First Set of Interrogatories Directed to Defendant d rds (hereinafter " "), pursuant to Rule 1.340, Florida Rules o Cure, and request the Defendant to answer said interrogatories in writing within thirty (30) days from date of service hereof. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. + +Mail to the following addressees on this 5th day of April , 2010: + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ" Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-745-5849 + +Jr., Esq. a e, eissing, rrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 Fistos + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. +Page 2 + +954-745-3556 Fax +*Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +*Attorneys for Defendant* [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +954-524-2822 - Fax +*Attorneys for Defendant, L.M.* + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed9ee4c629c6664a025fb510cae7574cdfd4b562 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503/EFTA02759503.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759503.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1958, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 500.25, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 500.25, + 113.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 113.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES \nDIRECTED TO DEFENDANT,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 318.1875 + ], + [ + 510.645751953125, + 318.1875 + ], + [ + 510.645751953125, + 346.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 346.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.352, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 367.87005615234375, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 367.87005615234375, + 552.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 242.352, + 552.5500030517578 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759503" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73e2345cdf2bf44574356d3192e7d8d893ab1f40 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** +**(15-MINUTE SPECIAL SET HEARING)** + +FILED +2010 APR -6 PM 4:34 +HARON R. BOCK, CLERK +FLORIDA BEACH COUNTY +COPY + +To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the following motion will be called up for hearing on May 11, 2010, at 8:15 A.M. before the **Honorable David F. [REDACTED]** at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +**EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR +ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON +[REDACTED] COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt to resolve the matters set for hearing has been attempted but an agreement has not been reached between parties as of the date of this notice. + +Judge David [REDACTED] procedure on special set hearings are as follows: + +1. 1. This hearing shall not be cancelled unless the issues of this motion have been settled and an order entered or the motion is withdrawn +2. 2. No additional motions are permitted without contacting the Judicial Assistant. + +- 3. Any Memorandum of Law submitted is limited to ten (10) pages, double space. +- 4. Any relevant pleading, Memorandum of Law or case law authority to be submitted is due seven (7) days prior to hearing date. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring at the hearing a blank proposed order with copies and envelopes. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 5th day of April , 2010. + +> BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 \-2 (561) 842-2820 (561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +Robert . Critton, Jr. + +Florida ar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(C set Ter Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Plaintiff s Motion to Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d44b351248cbf03f5418fec9e4a5175501470f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505/EFTA02759505.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759505.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2706, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 478.584, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 478.584, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING (15-MINUTE SPECIAL SET HEARING)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.616, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 194.616, + 330.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON [REDACTED] COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 546.75 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 546.75 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759505" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5578c38ee5c7ad138b00e5c2a94b1000785065bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOO(MEL:j; AG + +# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO D C ION + +To: See Service List below + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the un video of: \ ttomey will take the deposition via + +## DEPONENT + +Michael Fisten 1168 Cedar Falls Drive Weston, FL 33327 + +Richard Fandry 591 SW 182od W Pembroke Pines FD►33029 C.) + +## D + +ay 119, 2010 10:00 a.m. + +Monday April 19, 2010 (4) 2:00 p.m. + +- o I .71 C + +# LOCATION OF DEPOSITION + +101 Business Center 101 NE Third Avenue Suite #1500 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +101 Business Center 101 NE Third Avenue Suite #1500 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +upon oration, before Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer a rind by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court. + +#### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this e h day of April, 2010. + +Gary M.=, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 Attorneys for Defendant 383-9424 F + +Ele0\* + +C + +tl ielr + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 3340 (561) 842-282650/ (561) 253-01 Fax + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & W 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel f 012 Jeffrey Epstein + +By: + +Ro Jr. Florida Bar 162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Plaintiff Jefrey Epstein) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b35c793f3cfcb80dd73715992c09644d68ce377 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507/EFTA02759507.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759507.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2071, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 483.39398193359375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 483.39398193359375, + 127.863037109375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 127.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO D \nC \nION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 250.1300048828125 + ], + [ + 451.1750183105469, + 250.1300048828125 + ], + [ + 451.1750183105469, + 320.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 320.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEPONENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 142.1168212890625, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 142.1168212890625, + 415.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 415.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.04, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 415.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 257.04, + 415.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 354.96, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.8519897460938, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.8519897460938, + 416.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 416.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92, + 100.4000244140625 + ], + [ + 364.1637268066406, + 100.4000244140625 + ], + [ + 364.1637268066406, + 114.48748779296875 + ], + [ + 250.92, + 114.48748779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759507" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59bdb413be6b77dccac523c8471ba1e549cb40f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.md @@ -0,0 +1,801 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +ividually, individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. AG 50 2009CA040800XW B L7. c: + +"IIC + +CC) 1:15-: .. - , -c --- r•3 C 3=' + +### EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, requests that Defendant, J. EDWARDS a"), produce or make available for inspection documents responsive to the requests below within thirty (30) days from the date of service: + +### DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples + +etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and recordings), and including the file and file cover. 2 + +The term "Document" also means any and all comperecords, r) data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, SS. S a diskette, magnetic tape, optical or 0\ 1 magnetic-optical disk, computer memo h ive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marraa), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not + +yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +- D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. +- E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. +- F. "Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, investigative bills, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + - G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +# REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION' + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +- Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +- c. LJ Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against + +&#x27; Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +Jeffrey Epstein; + +- f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +- a. Any Plaintiff and J. or any entity with which he has been associated; +- b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, J. , Scott W. attorney or representative of regarding Jeffrey Epstein or w Kenneth Jenne, correspondence, memos, or si cuments between Rothstein, William Berger and Adler and/or any RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) hich mentions Jeffrey Epstein inkeing Mike Fisten, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, J. , Scott W. regarding Jeffrefliein or Kenneth Jenne, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. Scott W. Rothstein +- b. J. +- c. RRA +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein + +6. All fee sharing agreements between J. , RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiffs case. + +7. Alldocuments made available to any investor or potential investor by J. , RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing the Costs and payment of any bill or Costs in each Plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents received by you or your current firm wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are saved or stored in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to or from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents supporting the contention that a sexual assault took place on an airplane purportedly owned by Jeffrey Epstein or a Jeffrey Epstein entity at any time between 1998 and 2005. + +18. All documents related to the amount of all Costs that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. + +19. All documents setting forth to the amount of Costs were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. during the time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). + +20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: + +"What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as our investigation resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. + +We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children, and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls." + +(A) Provide all documents to support this assertion including any documents which are the source of the information. + +21. All documents related to or mentioning potential deponents in the Jane Doe, 1..M. or E.W. cases. + +22. All documents that support your cla' damages in your counterclaim in this case. ii\ + +23. The written fee agreeme A i rlicAStti • e Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you in this case. + +24. All emails exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or a similar reference was mentioned: + +- 1 +- j. Richard R( ick) Fandrey +- k. Christina Kitterman. +- a. Scott Rothstein +- b. Adler +- c. William Berger Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne David Boden Deborah Andrew Barnett + +25. A copy of your RRA business card. + +26. Any employment agreements, letter agreements or memos given to you by RRA or a representative or agent of RRA describing your compensation and benefits at RRA. + +27. All documents and communications from Herbert Stettin, as bankruptcy Trustee for RRA, asserting liens against recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA [REDACTED] + +### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of April, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant Bradley Edwards + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** + +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)* + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 151H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +E.W., + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +Case No. 502008CA028058 + +O AS + +### PROCEEDINGS BEV, THE + +## HONORABLE JUDGEAIXD W. HAFELE + +July 31, 2009 + +dc"N:30 a.m. + +2IoN. Dixie Highway t Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ennifer DiLorenzo, court reporter + +![](_page_7_Picture_15.jpeg) + +ESQUIRE .n A4 \*\*\*\*\*\*\* car. a.e.p + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquIresolutions.com + +IH THE CIRCUIT COURT OF flit 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM Bra01 MINTY. Flail\* + +E.H. + +Plaintiff. + +Cafe No. 502024CA0211058 EMS°. AD + +atmisr sasnam, + +witeressat. + +PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE + +HONORABLE JUDGE DONALD N. tarns + +July 31. 20D9 + +205 N. Dixie Minn./ay Meet Pale Beech. FL 32401 + +Jennifer Oltotento. court reporter + +1 Proceedings in the Matter of E.W. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +2 July 31. 2009 8:30 + +3 THE COURT: Good morning, gentlemen. + +4We're here this morning on the Plaintiffs + +motions to add punitive damages. Who will be 6 arguing on behalf of the Plaintiff? + +MR. Brad Your Honor. + +9 THE COURT: Aright, Mr. + +9 MR. Do I need to go to the + +10 podium or is right here fine? + +I I THE COURT: Whichever you prefer. + +12 MR. Your Honor, with our motion + +13 we filed • and, I believe. Your Honor has h - + +14 the discovery that was submitted b Mr. Epstein. + +15 which consists 04 Requests for Admissions, + +16 Requests for Production, Interrogatories. as + +17 well as Interrogatory responses under oath by my + +18 + +19 THE emi r? you have any cases that + +20 speak tote pr ption relative to the + +21 Defendant exercising his Fitth and Sixth + +22 Amendment rights during the deposition testimony + +23/ and/or during any other discovery? + +MR. Sure, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: know that Mr. Craton in his + +2 + +1 2 + +3 On bonen of the Plaintiff: + +4 ROTHSTEIN. ROSENFELOT & ADLER + +BY: WILLIAM J. BERGER. ESO., + +s Miner Park Office Tower + +Suite 675 + +6 225 NE Manor Boulevard + +Boca Raton, FL 33432 + +7 561.322.7761 + +wbergerfarra-law.com + +a + +ROTI EIN ROSEN + +9 BY: J. + +401 at as + +10 Suite 1650 + +Fort Lauderdale. FL + +11 954-522-3456 + +oedwardsOna-taw.com + +APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL + +11 + +13 On behalf of thetffendant + +14 BURMAN, CRITTON. LUTHER & COLEMAN + +OA& ROBERT D. CAUTION, JR., ESO., + +15 3,North Fleeter Drive + +• e 400 + +16 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 + +1-842-2820 + +rci ObcIclaw.com + +ESQUIRE .... + +2 + +1 5 6 + +%owl + +4 + +reply memorandum indicated some conflict in terms of the nature of the discussions of the appellate courts relative to that Issue. + +MR. : May I approach? + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +MR. I'm going to present the + +case of Fraser vs. Security and Investment out + +of the Fourth DCA. + +The pertinent part, it says: "Our + +conclusion is consistent with the prevailing + +rule that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid + +adverse Inferences against parties to civil + +actions when they refuse to testify in response + +to probative evidence offered against them: the + +amendment 'does not preclude the inference where + +the privilege is claimed by a party to a civil + +cause." + +It skips down and says: 'Such a rule is + +both logical and utilitarian. A party may not + +trample upon the rights of others and then + +escape the consequences by invoking a + +constitutional privilege - at least not in a + +civil setting.' + +The final paragraph on that page says: + +'Nor are we persuaded that the fact of + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +S15 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquIresolutions.00m + +5 7 1 we're not talking about 400, which, I believe, 2 is the number known to law enforcement, we are 3 talking about thousands of children, and it is 4 through a very intricate and complicated system 5 that he devised where he has as many as 20 6 people working underneath him that he is paying 7well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls. + +9 10 11 12 Right now we are at a punitive damages stage. We are not at a stage where we are talking about the admissibility of evidence. We are — + +13 14 15 THE COURT: Speaking only of a proffer to establish punitive damages as required under 768.721, correct? + +16 17 18 MR. : Exactly, and I was going to, for the record, read that part of 768.721: 'In a civil action, there is a' + +19 THE COURT: I think we can skip that. + +20 21 22 23 MR. : Okay. THE COURT: The statute speaks for itself and it's a part of the record today, so why don't you ahead and proceed? + +24 25 MR. : The reasonable showing, by way of proffer, that there is an intentional + +1 invocation of the privilege is irrelevant and 2 immaterial? 'In the case' -- Sony, 'Mr. 3 Justice Brandeis... observed that 'Silence is 4 often evidence of the most persuasive 5 character." + +6 Clearly, this case, out of our district 7 court, is an indication that adverse inferences may be drawn. + +1 2 misconduct or gross negligence on beh Defendant. + +3 S 6 7 8 9 Intentional misconduct Is defined definedas Defendant had actual knowledge of the wro permissible Conduct and the high probability that injury or damage to the claimant would result and, despite that knowledge. intentionally pursued that course of conduct resulting in injury or damage.' + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 In this case, we have intentional misconduct of the worse kind. This is a case that has been presented to the public through public relations people for the Defendant at times as "five or six bad under-aged prostitutes C om a high school that, as one of their stops, wound up at Mr. Epstein's home,' and that's not case at all. + +19 20 21 22 23 What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein - at least dating back as far as our investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 - has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. + +24 25 We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, + +6 + +9 He particularly goes after a very to vulnerable and impressionable age group that -- + +11 THE COURT: To use the quotation, 'the 12 evidence will show the Defendant sought out 13 underprivileged and economically disadvantaged 14 minor females,' and later go on to say, 15 'influenced them away from the typical 16 adolescent lifestyle as a result of his 17 allegedly criminal acts.' + +18 MR. : And that is exactly what 19 he's done. The age group begins as young as 20 12 years old and as old as 16 years old. There 21 Will be evidence that at 16 years old, many of 22 the girls are told, 'You're getting too old for 23 + +He very clearly targets this specific age roup and has a method to this; that is, 'Get + +the girls inside the house and I will do the 2 rest,' and he creates this God-like aura for 3 these girls and -- + +4 THE COURT: Let's talk about - pardon me for interrupting you - lets talk about the 6 precise claims that are being made here. You're 7 dealing with E.W. and L.M. - they're pseudonyms 8 for purposes of this litigation. Why don't we 9 speak to those two individuals at this juncture to and how the punitive damage proffer is 11 sufficient or insufficient relative to them 12 individually, please? + +13 I understand the global allegations and I understand the allegedly wide scale situation that you're suggesting as you've alleged here, but I want to go now to the precise claims made by these Iwo Plaintiffs who are in front of the Court today, and whether or not that proffer is sufficient to satisfy the case law, including the case that Mr. Critton cited, and that is: + +The Estate of Despair, vs. Avant. Group, Inc., which Is found al 900 So.2d. 637, and that was a Fifth District Court of Appeal case, decided in 2005. + +25 MR. Yes, Your Honor, and that Is + +![](_page_9_Picture_27.jpeg) + +ESQUIRE a Al N•wloCAII•C•OP•Al + +Toll Free: 800.211,3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquiresolutions.com + +1 2 3 S 4 7 9 10 11 12 13 3.4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the case that states: 'a 'proffer' according to traditional notions of the term, connotes merely an 'offer of evidence and neither the term standing alone nor the statute itself calls for an adjudication of the underlying veracity...is merely a representation of what evidence the defendant proposes to present.' We can turn to the sworn Interrogatory answers, No. 8, wherein L.M. and, similarly, E.W., in slightly different words, states: 'I was touched, battered, and fondled by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein during the incidents described in the complaint t observed the Defendant touch and fondle himself. I observed the Defendant ejaculate numerous times. I was made to touch the Defendant. I also observed sexual acts and had sexual acts perpetrated on me by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At various times I was unclothed, as was the Defendant and others. At all times material, I was a child under the age of 18 years old. The Defendant also used me to bring him other minor girls and he controlled and brainwashed me' -- THE COURT: Just a second. (Telephone interruption.) + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. "and brainwashedme believing this lifestyle was healthy and normal for a girl my age. I was a victim of various criminal acts and sexual exploitation. I was induced and coerced by Del nit o acts of prostitution? While we're on the coerc prostitution, there Is a specific -- THE COURT: Before you move on, that's LM.'s — MR. Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT:, — Answer to Interrogatories? Why don't you read into the record E.W.'s An svier to Intern tones so the record is clear? MR. . I apologize, Your Honor. %I. THE COURT: Take your time. . 11L- MR. I=E: Answer to Interrogatory No. or E.W. indicates: 'My injuries are emotional and psychological and are the direct result of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's actions. I was touched, battered, and fondled by the Defendant during the incidents described in the complaints. I observed the Defendant touch and fondle himself. I observed the Defendant ejaculate numerous times. I was made to touch AC( + +10 + +2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 cause of action. Reading 796.09, Paragraph 1: "A person has a cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages" - this is in the statute - 'against a person who coerced them into prostitution,' and it goes on to define what coercion means, and it Is exactly what happened in this case. This statute allows for punitive damages on a statutory level irrespective of the age of the person that is coerced into prostitution. THE COURT: And the coercion that you're talking about are the alleged acts as between these two Plaintiffs and Mr. Epstein as opposed to, I think, there's something in one of the Interrogatories that suggests that there may have been prostitution that followed, at least one of the Plaintiff's, involvement with Mr. Epstein, but you're speaking solely about the prostitution issues as it concerns the Plaintiffs here and Epstein: is that accurate? MR. : I believe, if I understand what you are saying, I mean, in terms of damages, if one of the Plaintiffs - and I can represent • if one of the Plaintiffs was led + +![](_page_10_Picture_10.jpeg) + +1 the Defendant. I also observed sexual acts and 2 had sexual acts perpetrated on me and was forced 3 to perform on me, including oral sex and other 4 activities. At various times I was unclothed, 5 as was Defendant and others. At all times 6 material, I was a child under the age of 7 18 years. I was a victim of various criminal 8 acts and sexual exploitation. I was induced and 9 coerced by the Defendant into acts of to prostitution.' 11 THE COURT: Thank you. You were going to 12 speak foals I point -- 13 MR. Right. 14 THE COURT: -- before I asked you to read 15 into the record thosainterrogatOry answers. Go 16 ahead. 17 MR. Where we left off was the 18 coercion into prostitution. What makes these 19 crimes so egregious is the fact that these girls 20 that we're talking about were an beginning 21 their grooming process with Mr. Epstein when 22 ey're 14 and 15 and 16 years old. 23 There is a specific statute, which we have ed, and a cause of action under our plaint, that Is under 796.09, Coercion, civil + +12 + +ESQUIRE + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquiresolutIons.com + +1 into a life of prostitution after being 2 indoctrinated into this deviant lifestyle at an 3 early age by Mr. Epstein - she was not a 4 prostitute prior to that - and I relate that 5 similar to kids of that age being brought over 6 to somebody's house that is as powerful and 7 wealthy as him and he has, let's say, cocaine on 9 the table, and they do that for three years. 9 They think it's fun at the time, but after that to they have this addiction that continues on. 11 This is something similar to what happened to 12 one of the clients. + +13 But, yes, the coercion Into prostitution 14 is something that on a statutory level already 15 allows for punitive damages, and that's 16 irrespective of the age. + +17 THE COURT: Again, I'm trying to 18 understand the factual basis. There's 19 allegations that Mr. Epstein paid these young 20 ladies \$200 to massage him and then subsequent 21 thereto, there was some type of alleged sexual 22 activity. Are you speaking to that specifically 23 when you're talking about the statutory remedy 24 or are you speaking about something distinct 25 from that? + +14 + +1 MR. No, that's specifical 2 I am talking about — + +3 THE COURT: Okay. 4 MR. : Mr. Epstein paying 5 and using their age, their economic - their lad( 6 of wealth - the fact that these are poor. 7 disadvantaged children with very tittle parental 8 guidance to his advantage to induce them into 9 acts of prostitution. + +10 THE COURT: I'll give you two minutes to 11 wrap up, please. 12 MR. : Okay. + +13 Your Honor, while I know that we are 14 focusing on E.W. and L.M., there are certain 15 tenses that have been made such as, The girls 16 were' - 'we didn't know that they were over 18, 17 envise we wouldn't have done this: where we 16 re going to be able to show there are hundreds + +19 and hundreds and hundreds of girls and none of 20 Y them were over the age of 18. 21 Many of these girls, including my clients, 22 told him that they were under the age of 18 and 23 he continued to do this misconduct, which is 24 exactly what the statute or what the punitive 25 damages statute speaks to when it talks about + +6 7 + +9 + +25 + +1 intentional misconduct and/or gross negligence. 2 I think the record is very dear at this 3 point, especially after this proffer, that if 4 any case is deservant of punitive damages being 5 added, it's this one. + +6 THE COURT: Alright. Thank you. I'll 7 give you a couple minutes to wrap up after Mr. Crition finishes his argument. + +9 MR. Thank you, Your Honor. 10 THE COURT: Thank you. + +11 MR. CRITTON: May it please the Court. As 12 the Court knows, I represent Mr. Epstein in this 13 matter. + +14 Your Honor, a couple of things to start - 15 the case that Mr. cites deals with 16 inferences, deals with inferences at trial time 17 as distinct from inferences that, I believe, are 18 sufficient to carry the day, so-to-speak, in the 19 absence of other evidence with Mr. Epstein's 20 claim of Fifth Amendment privilege. As well, we 21 cited to the court cases - and I'll gel to in 22 just a minute - that specifically address that 23 ^ ue. + +/ Secondly, we're not here on - and I think Court, I think, I kind of at least got the + +16 + +drift is we're not here on other claims - we're 2 here on E.W. and L.M.'s claim today to add 3 punitive damages and, in fact, to they meet the 4 standard under the applicable statute in this 5 instance? + +What I think is the most striking pal about this - and while I believe that the evidence may be - their perception, the Plaintiffs' perception of the evidence - may be different than ourselves, but I think the evidence in this case will show, at least LM. and E.W., were prostitutes before they ever met Mt Epstein, they remain prostitutes, and they are still prostitutes today. + +THE COURT: But is my role today one of weighing the evidence or one of determining whether or not there's a sufficient record in order to allow a punitive damage claim to stand? + +I mean, in one of the cases, I believe it's the case of State of Wisconsin Investment Board vs. Plantation Square Associates, that's found at 761 F.Supp 1569 - Judge Hugler (phonetic) of the federal court provided an excellent discussion of the distinction between the proofs necessary to sustain a claim for + +![](_page_11_Picture_24.jpeg) + +ESQUIRE + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquiresolutions.com + +| | 17 19 | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | punitive damages even at summary judgment. much FBI agent and a U.S. attorney that was there at | +| 2 | less a trial, and compared that with the the time - and she talked about going over to | +| 3 | relatively lighter burden of simply making a Mr. Epstein's hOuse. She said, "I had a fake | +| 4 | proffer of record evidence to support a claim ID' She was told to make certain that she was | +| 5 | for punitive damages. 16. She told Mr. Epstein she was 18, and she | +| 6 | MR. CRITTON: Right. said it was her understanding that all of the | +| 7 | THE COURT: Arent we at that stage; that other girls that she brought for this horrific | +| 8 | is, the latter stage right now? experience - she continued to bring other girls | +| 9 | MR. CRITTON: Yes, and I very well and go herself on a number of occasions. | +| 10 | understand the distinction and, I believe, I She said that she, herself -- On Page 8, | +| 11 | understand what the Court's role is in this it asks, "Did she ever call you?' - and I assume | +| 12 | particular instance in making that that was someone else - and she goes, "No. I | +| 13 | determination. gave Jeffrey my number and, I said, You know, if | +| 14 | A couple of the issues though, in you want me to give you a massage again, | +| 15 | particular • with a camera here today, for some basically I'm more than anxious to come." | +| 16 | unknown reason, showing up at this hearing - is On Page 9, LM. says, 'I willingly took' | +| 17 | there were references to drugs, alcohol, other 'so I willingly, the first time, took off my top | +| 18 | instances that are not applicable to this case. when I gave him the massage and nothing more | +| 19 | There's no pleadings on that particular issue. than that." | +| 20 | and I'm concerned about that, is that there's an She goes on to say in her testimony at | +| 21 | attempt to jack this up in the media, as I said, ge 10, her sworn statement, "I said, I told | +| 22 | with the camera here today, for no other Jeffrey, 'I heard that you like massages | +| 23 | hearing. It's ridiculous under the | +| 24 | circumstances, and to make aS of these ■ 'And he said 'Like, yeah.' He said, 'But | +| 25 | allegations against Mr. Epstein for which there u don't have to do anything that you don't | +| 1 | is absolutely no evidentiary proof nor was thilSe | +| 2 | submitted here in support of their proffer, I | +| 3 | did want to address at that. | +| 4 | So let me get to the heart of the Issue. | +| 5 | I think the most distinguishing part of this | +| 6 | particular case that's different; that is, LM. | +| 9 | Again, there's a strong distinction. She | +| 10 | gave a sworn statement back in '05 or in '06. | +| 11 | She had - L.M. did- she had an attorney, Mr. | +| 12 | Eisenberg, h was before she had a civil lawyer | +| 13 | who's seeking millions of dollars under these | +| 14 | circumstances, and the testimony of L.M. at that | +| 15 | ime was very significant and it flies directly | +| 16 | %. the face of her "sworn testimony' or her | +| 17 | n interrogatories.' | +| 18 - | The Court had Mr. read in L.M.'s | +| 19 | answer and E.W.'s answer to their | +| 20 | 1 Interrogatories as to what allegedly occurred | +| 21 | with Mr. Epstein and, a surprise,' they were | +| 22 | almost verbatim, word for word, as to what | +| 23 | allegedly happened. | +| 24 | But at the time of her sworn statement to | +| 25 | the FBI, L.M. said on 4/24/07 - again, it was an | +| | 1 feel comfortable with." | +| | 2 'And I said, 'Okay,' but I willingly took | +| | 3 it off" - this is L.M. at the time. This is her | +| | 4 sworn testimony. At Page 17, the police officer or the FBI | +| | 6 agent says, 'and when he turned over then did he | +| | 7 touch you at all or was he just' -- Her answer and E.W., Is the fact that L.M. gave a sworn | +| | 8 was, 'No, I did not touch him, he did not touch statement to the FBI In this instance. | +| | 9 me. He didn't even want..' and I assume to 'touch you' She goes on to say, 'He didn't want me to touch him and he didn't touch me.' She goes on and on in this statement, L.M., in the statement and she says, 'We had fun.' 'It was positive," on Page 18. On Page 19, 'You know, I would wear panties. Willingly one time, because we were making jokes and everything, and willingly one time, I had, yes, I was totally nude, but I was line with that.' She talks about within the statement the other girls that she brought over. Again, she's testified or she gives the Interrogatory answer that this was outrageous to her, but, yet she | + +![](_page_12_Picture_3.jpeg) + +E S Q Val B. + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquiresolutions.com + +| | 21 | | 23 | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | brought other girls to experience this. She | | | +| | referenced. 'W' I would represent to be E.W. In | | | +| | that when Mr. Berger and I were arguing a prior | | | +| 1 | me. They begged me, you know, for us to | | | +| 2 | Jeffrey's house because they loved Je | | | +| 3 | Jeffrey is a respectful man, he really is. | | | +| 4 | mean, he all thought we were of a | | | +| 7 | to her, "Now, when you re working for him, you | | | +| | were going over to Jeff s house to give him | | | +| 9 | massages, did you ha end?" | | | +| 10 | 'Yeah." | | | +| 11 | 'And how heir boyfriend feel about | | | +| 12 | it?' | | | +| 13 | "1-1,Was' - L. . says, 'He was a jealous | | | +| 14 | 610e boy, but he didn't care, 'Bring home the | | | +| 15 | ' ' and the statement goes on and on, Your | | | +| 16 | onor. I know you've had an opportunity read it | | | +| 17 | ore and I reference again today. | | | +| 19 | between L.M., now that she has a civil lawyer | | | +| 20 Y | and she wants money, versus at the time that she | | | +| 21 | didn't want money and she gave a statement under | | | +| 22 | oath to the FBI and the United States attorney's | | | +| 23 | office. | | | +| 24 | I recognize the Courts role in this. I | | | +| 25 | recognize the standard. I recognize that both | | | +| | | 1 | LM. and E.W. in their Answers to | +| | says - now that she has a civil lawyer seeking | 2 | Interrogatories have made all sorts of, what we | +| | money damages - new TS a bad experience.' | 3 | believe in part, are baseless or in large part | +| | Now all of a sudden, "He touched me, he did | 4 | baseless allegations, but we also have sworn | +| | these things to me." She references - at least, on Page 29 of | 5 | testimony of LM. on this instance. | +| | | 6 | We don't have it of E.W., but we have LM. | +| | the statement, Judge - there's a W" that's | 7 | testifying about her own experience under oath: | +| | the E.W. complaint, and I think we established | a | That it was positive: that he never used force, | +| | | 9 | that she willingly did a number of times | +| | motion to you. So she talks about E.W. on Page | 10 | including giving topless massages; that Mr. | +| | | 11 | Epstein never touched her, that she never | +| | | 12 | touched him inappropriately, all she did was | +| | Plats when she starts saying, she says, | 13 | basically give him massages; that E.W., in this | +| | 'EW' -'she; meaning E.W., "was my baby's | 14 | instance, as well as all the other girls that | +| | fathers girlfriend at the time." | 15 | she took, she spoke with them afterwards, they | +| | Then on Page 30, 'How old was E.W.?" 'She was 17.' | 16 | begged to go back to Mr. Epstein's home, and | +| | | 17 | none of them, not one of them ever complained. | +| | Alright, so you have 12, 13, 14. 15, 16. | 18 | So there's a large chasm between what is | +| | You have L.M. saying "W" was 17 at the time. | 19 | now being asserted in Answers to Interrogatories | +| | 'And what happened when W came over?" | 20 | and mere allegations in the complaint between | +| | She said the same thing, "She went a few | 21 | what the sworn testimony, at least L.M., was | +| | times." | 22 | nder the circumstances, as it relates to | +| | On Page 31, L.M. testified under oath to the FBI and the United States attorney, 'None of my girls ever had a problem. And they'd call | 23 | rseff and what she was told by E.W. and other ifs. Thank you. Your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you. | +| | | | Mr. III give you a couple minutes here. | +| | that's what's so sad about it.. And she goes on, Page 3‘, a'nd INFBI says | | MR. I . Your Honor, I want to address the statement that was made by LM. to the FBI and how that even came about. This Is a girl who, at the time of the statement, was fairly unaware of the investigation against Mr. Epstein, who is now, as we know, a convicted sex offender. An attorney showed up to her house, paid for by Mr. Epstein, to represent her despite - and told her that, "For your role, you could possibly be implicated In some wrongdoing.' MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, just -- | +| | There's clearly a distinction conflict | | MR. : He represent -- MR. CRITTON: — note my objection. This is complete hearsay here. He was aware of what was filed. He didn't file any affidavits for his client in opposition. I would object to any of this. THE COURT: Alright. I don't want to get Into any of the details. I don't think its necessary at this juncture, which probably leads me to my question to you: that is: Is the | + +![](_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg) + +ESQUIRE + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esq uiresolutions.com + +| 25 | 27 | +|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2 juncture? | | +| 3 MR. : No, Your Honor, I don't | | +| 4 believe that's the standard at this stage | | +| 6 believes that either. | | +| 7 Just so the record's clear, we had nothing | | +| 9 that was implied. I don't know who did. I | | +| MR. : It's perfectly rine, bul I | | +| MR. a Either way, sounds like what | | +| 1 Epstein's possession indicating the dates, w | | +| 2 would show how old those girls were, and t' | | +| 3 evidence that will be presented in this ca | | +| 4 There are serious statutes to protect | | +| 6 second and third degree felonies were committed | | +| 7 repeatedly against them, and this Is a case | | +| 8 where, at least In a civilcase, punitive | | +| 9 damages are warranted, Your Honor. | | +| 10 Thank you, Your Honor. | | +| 11 THE COURT:__Thank you both. I'm going to | | +| 12 grant the motiorcirttonlormance with and | | +| 13 following the Des rain case, the Court indicates, | | +| 14 in following the analysis of Judge Hugler - and, | | +| 15 by the way, that analysts of Judge Hugler is | | +| 16 commented upon on a supportive basis by several | | +| 17 appellate courts - and in the Despain case under | | +| 18 headnote 7 and 8 on Page 642 it slates: 'a | | +| 20 the term, connotes merely an 'offer of evidence | | +| 21 and neither the term standing alone nor the | | +| 22 statute itself calls for an acYudication of the | | +| 23 underlying veracity of that which is submitted, | | +| 24 much less for countervailing evidentiary | | +| 25 submissions' | | +| 1 | The Court finds that, while I appreciate | +| 2 | Mr. Critton's argument and while I appreciate | +| 3 | his submission, that essentially at this stage, | +| 4 | respectfully, he is, at this point, presenting | +| 5 | countervailing evidentiary submissions. | +| 6 | The Court further goes on in paraphrasing and then directly quoting Judge Hugler: 'Therefore a proffer is merely a representation | +| 9 | of what evidence the defendant proposes to | +| 10 | present and is not actual evidence.' Actually, | +| 11 | that's a quote from Grim vs. State, 641 So.2d. | +| 12 | 455, 462, and that, I believe, is a Florida | +| 13 | Supreme Court case, even though the citation | +| 14 | itself is not complete. | +| 15 | It goes on to say importantly - and that | +| 16 | is in the Despain case - 'A reasonable showing | +| 17 | by evidence in the record would typically | +| 18 | include depositions, interrogatories, and | +| 19 | requests for admissions that have been filed | +| 20 | with the court. Hence, an evidentiary hearing | +| 22 | where witnesses testify and evidence is offered | +| 22 | and scrutinized under the pertinent evidentiary | +| 23 | rules, as in a trial, is neither contemplated | +| 24 | nor mandated by the statute in order to terrnine whether a reasonable basis has been established to plead punitive damages,' and Ill admit this citation from the Fifth District Court of Appeal, but, again, that Is cited in | +| 4 | Despain. Likewise, In Strasser vs. Yalamanchi, 677 | +| 6 | So.2d. 22, which is a Florida Fourth District | +| 7 | Court of Appeal case from 1996, which is one of | +| 8 | the paradigm cases on the proffering of punitive | +| 9 | damage evidence, that states that 'there was | +| 0 | reasonable basis for recovery of punitive | +| 11 | damages' can be demonstrated by either a | +| 12 | presentation of supporting evidence already in | +| 13 | the record or by a proffer of the evidence to | +| 14 | come. | +| 15 | I find that a combination of the Answers | +| 16 | to Interrogatories - I will take into account, | +| 17 | though, give little weight to the Fifth | +| 18 | Amendment arguments of Plaintiffs - but | +| 19 | certainly the Answers to Interrogatories on | +| 20 | behalf of both of these individual Plaintiffs in | +| 21 | this Court's view, and particularly in | +| 22 | conjunction with the Coercion statute relative | +| 23 | to prostitution, 796.09, would form a reasonable | +| 24 | basis to establish at least a claim for punitive | +| 25 | damages, recognizing that, again, the courts | + +![](_page_14_Picture_3.jpeg) + +. ESQUIRE 0.• + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las 0las Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquiresolutions.com + +4 2 THE COURT: --'the amended c 3 shall be deemed filed as of the date o order from today.' + +5 6 MR. BERGER: We'll draft it present it to the bailiff. + +7 8 9 10 THE COURT: Not a pro ank you very much. Gentlemen, t k you 1 ur arguments and your submissions harts a good rest of the week. + +11 12 MR. CRI L H they get It typed I'll lake a copy. + +13 aring ncluded at 9:05 a.m.) + +29 + +1 have made clear that the proffer and the burden 2 on the moving party Is much less than at summary 3 judgment or at trial, so I will allow the 4 amendments to proceed and, therefore, we do have an amended complaint, so how much time will you 6 need, Mr. Griffon, to respond? + +7 MR. CRITTON: I just wrote to Mr. Berger 20 days I would Ike for both of them. if that's 9 agreeable with the Court. + +10 THE COURT: Fine with me, as long as it's 11 fine with the Plaintiffs. + +12 MR. BERGER: Yes, Your Honor. I drafted 13 an order and just showed it to Mr. Clifton. It 14 just says: 'Granted for reasons stated on the 15 record. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint 16 to allege a count for battery' - which is also 17 part of our motion, which was unopposed -'and 18 punitive damages. The defense shall have 20 19 days to respond' + +20 THE COURT: I believe you already filed 21 the proposed amended complaint. + +22 MR. : Yes. Your Honor. I filed it 23 with the motion. + +24 MR. BERGER: I'll correct that. + +25 THE COURT: You can indicate in there •- + +30 + +MR. CRITTON: Deemed filed. + +1 2 3 4 31 CERTIFICATE STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF BROWARD ) + +UR DiLORENZO, R + +![](_page_15_Picture_22.jpeg) + +20 21 22 + +;iS '4)9 + +I, JENNIFER D. DiLORENZO, Shorthand Reporter, certify that I was authorized to and did stenographically report the foregoing proceedings and that the transcript Is a true and complete record of my stenographic notes. + +Dated this 5th day of August, 2009. + +ESQUIBE + +Toll Free: 800.211.3376 Facsimile: 954.331.4418 + +Suite 1300 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 www.esquIresolutions.Com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc14e79f027b80c23cbe56cc9aff846e6a022aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/EFTA02759509.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,818 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 124810, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.74, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_27.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_24.jpeg", + "_page_12_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_14_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_15_Picture_22.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.25199999999995, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 506.2649230957031, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 506.2649230957031, + 128.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 288.25199999999995, + 128.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 320.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 320.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.736, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 406.0368957519531, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 406.0368957519531, + 458.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 200.736, + 458.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.976, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 393.7044372558594, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 393.7044372558594, + 417.54498291015625 + ], + [ + 212.976, + 417.54498291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.024, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 246.024, + 181.44 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 151H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 523.349853515625, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 523.349853515625, + 109.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 109.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS BEV, THE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 435.4710693359375, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 435.4710693359375, + 319.1080627441406 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 319.1080627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HONORABLE JUDGEAIXD W. HAFELE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 475.6163024902344, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 475.6163024902344, + 347.238037109375 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 347.238037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 315 + ], + [ + "Line", + 140 + ], + [ + "Text", + 105 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 331 + ], + [ + "Line", + 153 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 375 + ], + [ + "Line", + 185 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 263 + ], + [ + "Line", + 132 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 309 + ], + [ + "Line", + 151 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 328 + ], + [ + "Line", + 162 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 271 + ], + [ + "Line", + 131 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 217 + ], + [ + "Line", + 107 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759509" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_10_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_10_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..747e97e5868df11feb8bcd0f8c2cc0880e8a3789 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_10_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7c53ccf0268500469f5e60b2f1650995133aa7a1e3470c0cd89dcc886ad9ab7b +size 2355 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_11_Picture_24.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_11_Picture_24.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8da46c3b9491e224d08d975f638d72c42f421f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_11_Picture_24.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dc16260d2d299ff9735196334bf50768ef3af43cb0038edac2ae5d50069de62c +size 3245 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_12_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_12_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09e2a0c2ff4075503f88bb226501608097a2977a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_12_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d1856426098ecfe690b348978cd21670c0f04da5efc5ec6ec93897c7efdf4bc5 +size 2400 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af796e27284e718a6eb7ce93c17128e91f5d7926 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0ad4b6c734b3cf0df843554bda793a913b2c252123f99b3f5f7088b6309c9d64 +size 3228 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_14_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_14_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3164023c45cc6c0cc8e1c80e1a3e14753750c03f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_14_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1da7d36585b57b3d7e9efe052d70937529a0b36a2eeff267a3a7f277c617a187 +size 2508 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_15_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_15_Picture_22.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e825f69d00dd25082a8623f43801baa29b8ade7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_15_Picture_22.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1df25f5e562481c1af95586cd2b2119d449053569f7adc01418e0ef07bfbd24e +size 2465 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_7_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_7_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca03b3a6e6ecfe9f9f1db27b5f35192cce052842 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_7_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e8dcf694b12528f7b45cd829cde3e77f46e22d93099eea6868edd272ca7882cf +size 2817 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_9_Picture_27.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_9_Picture_27.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ff3d028ea5b1302e22638ed6073c50de4eb978f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759509/_page_9_Picture_27.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dbfd85133d4d73bf958ef669dfb7049481faf5a744d13645a9c6b93b42bd6b77 +size 2488 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a41e8bd9cdacb76c7cc9280efb9b631eee37ab7b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +MOTION PURSUANT TO F.S. §57.105 + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. Edwards, moves this Honorable Court for the imposition of sanctions pursuant to the provisions of F.S. §57.105 on the basis that the Plaintiff and his counsel knew or reasonably should have known that the Plaintiff's claims against ██████ J. ██████, and the defenses to ██████ J. ██████ counterclaims when initially presented to the court or subsequent thereto: + +- a) were not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claims and/or the defenses; or +- b) were not and would not be supported by the application of then existing law to those material facts. + +FILED +10 APR 13 PM 6:02 +CIRCUIT CLERK +CIRCUIT COUNTY FL + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 13th day of April, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff +[REDACTED] J. EDWARDS + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion Pursuant to F.S.§ 57.105 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, et al +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-524-2820 +Fax: 954-524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5219127fbe67486e9328a21e044aec6cf26c852 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525/EFTA02759525.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759525.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2307, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.89599999999996, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 310.89599999999996, + 128.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION PURSUANT TO F.S. \u00a757.105", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759525" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759528/EFTA02759528.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759528/EFTA02759528.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8962d481ed699c00e59b33907d08be876b7f4e90 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759528/EFTA02759528.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +10 APR 15 PM 4:16 +MARCH R. BOCK, CLERK +SALT RE AND COUNTY FL +CIRCUIT COURT + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** +**(MOTION CALENDAR)** + +**To: All Counsel of Record** + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the + +following: **MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER** + +**DATE:** Monday, April 19, 2010 + +**TIME:** 8:45 A.M. + +**JUDGE:** The Honorable David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse, Room 9C + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail and email to all counsel on the attached list on April H 2010. + +> Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suit Fort Lauderdale. 0 (954) 524-282 (954) 524-2 Attorney nt L.M. + +'Oen, Jr. Ar + +### MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +L.M., pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c), hereby files this Motion for Protective Order to prevent the depositions of any private investigators who are working on or have worked on the case of L.M. v. Epstein and as grounds therefore would state: + +- 1. In June of 2008, Jeffrey Epstein plead guilty to two felony cases related to his sexual abuse of minors, and he was incarcerated and forever labeled a sex offender; he remains on community control for these offenses as of the date of this motion. +- 2. L.M. was one of his many (thought to be in the hundreds) of underage victims. + +- 3. On September 11, 2008, L.M. filed a civil complaint against Jeffrey Epstein for Mr. Epstein having molested L.M. on many occasions when she was a minor child. +- 4. The case was originally filed by Brad while at the law firm of Brad and associates. +- 5. In or about April of 2009, Brad went to work for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), and his cases, including the case of L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, became cases of the RRA law firm. +- 6. The case of L.M. versus Jeffrey Epstein was litigated through RRA from April 2009 until the firm's dissolution in October of 2009. +- 7. The law firm of RRA, like most not all law firms, hired private investigators to perform investigative work in anticipation and furtherance of litigation. +- 8. Several private investigators, including Michael Fisten and Richard Fandry, were hired by RRA to perform investigative work on the L.M. case, in anticipation and furtherance of litigation. +- 9. As has been well publicized, RRA suddenly disbanded in October/November 2009 when it was discovered that the firm's President, Scott Rothstein, stole firm money, which forced the firm into bankruptcy and it was ultimately uncovered that Mr. Rothstein ran a ponzi scheme our of the RRA law firm and consequently pled guilty to various federal crimes. + +- 10. L.M. is one of many females that was molested by Mr. Epstein as a minor, and as such the 20-plus lawsuits related to Mr. Epstein being a serial child molester have also received extensive publicity. +- 11. It should be noted that Mr. Epstein has not denied any of the claims alleged by these children against him, including those by L.M., and has instead relied on his invocation of the 5th amendment as his sole defense in all of the filed civil cases. +- 12. On December 7, 2009, Jeffrey Epstein, in, an attempt to exploit the demise of RRA, filed this frivolous lawsuit against Scott Rothstein, Brad , and L.M., alleging basically that the three defendants conspired to sell settlements of cases against Jeffrey Epstein to third party investors. +- 13. Jeffrey Epstein filed this lawsuit, despite knowing that he could not substantiate the claims and in fact taking the 5°' in his deposition in this case where he is a Plaintiff on all issues relevant to his claims. +- 14. The claims are completely unfounded, and there is an outstanding 57.105 letter to Mr. Epstein's attorney that was sent on behalf of Brad and L.M.; those Motions will be before this court after the expiration of the 21 day notice period. +- 15. On March 23, 2010, Mr. Epstein took a day long deposition of attorney Brad (who is himself represented by Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley), and the questions were meant to invade + +attorney-client and work-produc: privilege relation to the investigation of the cases against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- 16. Jeffrey Epstein has now noticed the depositions of Michael Fisten and Richard Fandry, both private investigators that were hired to perform investigative work on behalf of L.M. in pursuit of her cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Both depositions have been noticed unilaterally by Epstein for April 19, 2010. +- 17. Neither of these investigators are witnesses on any witness list nor is there any intent by L.M. to call either investigator as a witness. +- 18. This Motion has been filed at the undersigned's first opportunity and noticed for hearing in accordance with the Court's local rules. + +# Memorandum in Support of Motion + +Information relating to a matter which is the subject of litigation, which is received by a party's attorneys from investigators and adjusters in anticipation of or connected with litigation, is protected by the work product privilege. See Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Board, 958 So.2d 5003 (Fla. 15t DCA 2007), citing Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Timmons 61 So.2d 426 (Fla. 1952); Federal Express Corp. v. Cantaway, 778 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Florida cases are clear that it is improper and impermissible to allow the taking of the deposition of an opposing party's investigator, so long as the investigator has not been listed as witnesses, as such a deposition would necessarily invade the work-product privilege and irreparably prejudice the case. See + +Huet v. Tromp, 912 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). see also 5500 North Corporation v. Willis, 729 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 511 DCA 1999). + +In this case, any questions by Jeffrey Epstein would only seek 'nformation related to the investigations of the civil actions against Mr. Epstein, af ould thus clearly invade the work-product privilege. As such, this court must grarTi this Protective Order to prevent the depositions of these investigators from being taken. + +WHEREFORE, L.M. requests this Court to enter a protective order as set forth above. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true s ri4rect tie copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail and email to q .ou Ion the attached list on April H , 2010. + +> a M. MIN, Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderd. 33301 (954) 524- :20 (954) 52 -282 fa Attorn ys f• De ant L.M. + +By: Gary M. Jr. Florida Bar No.: 914444 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Protective Order + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759531/EFTA02759531.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759531/EFTA02759531.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ead39558aa1bdf699c05c518b6b1e7eb966c88d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759531/EFTA02759531.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,368 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759531.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7019, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.96299999999997, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 126.43853759765625 + ], + [ + 308.96299999999997, + 126.43853759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.91699999999997, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 411.1727294921875, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 411.1727294921875, + 385.93853759765625 + ], + [ + 200.91699999999997, + 385.93853759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Memorandum in Support of Motion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 410.8159484863281, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 410.8159484863281, + 415.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 415.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.58999999999997, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 386.621337890625, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 386.621337890625, + 360.92498779296875 + ], + [ + 224.58999999999997, + 360.92498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.792, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 276.792, + 141.75 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759531" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f33fedbc1d2bc0afe35da96ac5f23831bfc4518 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +2010 APR 15 PM 4:00 +STANDARD EDITED CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL + +**ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND** +**DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES** + +**I. SCHEDULING** + +This action is set for jury trial on the eight week calendar beginning October 25, 2010. YOU MUST APPEAR AT 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. ON FRIDAY, October 15, 2010, IN COURTROOM 9C, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA FOR THE CALENDAR CALL. (10 day(s) reserved for the trial of this cause). + +The trial will be scheduled sometime during the calendar, at a date and time to be provided at the calendar call, subject to the court's ordering a later case setting. The docket ends 12/17/10. + +**II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE** + +A. On the last business day no later than 120 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. + +B. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. + +C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + +1. 1. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; +2. 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; +3. 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; +4. 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and +5. 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. + +D. On the last business day no later than **30 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL**, the parties shall confer and: + +1. 1. discuss settlement; +2. 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; +3. 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; and +4. 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. + +E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the duty of counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than **20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL**. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + +1. 1. a list of all pending motions including **MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE MOTIONS** requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (**MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE HEARINGS** shall not be **heard the day of trial or thereafter.**) +2. 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; +3. 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; +4. 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; +5. 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; +6. 6. a statement of estimated trial time; +7. 7. names of attorneys to try case; and +8. 8. number of peremptory challenges per party. + +F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. + +G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late + +discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. + +H. DISCOVERY. Unless otherwise agreed in the Pm-Trial Stipulation, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR CALENDAR CALL, absent agreement for later discovery specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or f other good cause shown. + +I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Civ. P.1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon m party, counsel shall meet and prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E an , rpulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a p tri conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of R 2 otions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pre-trial conference. + +J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior tole:CIS call, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to r curt t appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal q\ e vi t arise during the trial. ich may reasonably be anticipated to + +K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PREII RIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the 1,,re-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's sched n o f 9,e matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. + +L. PREMARKING EXH S. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identificati Ljxhibits, as directed by the clerk. + +M. DEP ON DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, each rve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intend t ofTe as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO ALENDA • L each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designate s Mons of depositions designated, together with objections to the depositions, or portions the f, originally designated. No later than calendar call, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +# III. MEDIATION + +A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + +1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. + +2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE,all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. + +3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. + +4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement ent. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to ment to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), + +B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling diatiThrThe parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to C rt for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (0, Fla. R. Civ. P. The ttomey or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall .00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. + +C. Completion of mediation prior to cal 11 is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate n, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings na e s ricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. + +D. Any party opposing m 1,700(b). proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure + +## IV. NONCOMPLIANC + +### NONCOMPLI ITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING jdF CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER IONS AS ARE JUST. + +DO ORDERED in West Palm Be h County, Florida this /ty of Apri , + + +DAVID F. Circuit Judge + +Copies furnished: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach. FL 33401 ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQUME. 303 Banyan Blvd.. Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JAFFE, WEISSING. FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.A., 425N. Andrews Ave., Suite Z Ft. Laudadale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d93c7f0ca2c6a83703752265d38ff66fbd532f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537/EFTA02759537.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,330 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759537.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 9521, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 447.372, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 447.372, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 465.732, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 465.732, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 327.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. SCHEDULING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 201.34799999999998, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 201.34799999999998, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 355.59000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 481.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 202.05809020996094, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 202.05809020996094, + 643.6074981689453 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 643.6074981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NONCOMPLIANC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 258.1575622558594, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 258.1575622558594, + 477.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 477.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NONCOMPLI ITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN \nTHE STRIKING jdF CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF \nSUCH OTHER IONS AS ARE JUST.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 538.2565307617188, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 538.2565307617188, + 534.4924926757812 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 534.4924926757812 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759537" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4417cbaba13779fab63b25119091f04434cc3476 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla R Civ Pro 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, +[REDACTED] J [REDACTED], +individually, and L M , individually, + +Defendants + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +To MARC S NURIK ESQ Law Offices of Marc S Nurik [REDACTED] Est Bro [REDACTED] +Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 GARY M [REDACTED] JR ESQ +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman PL 425 N Andrews Avenue +Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 JACK SCAROLA ESQ Searcy Denney Scarola +Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL 33409 +and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss PA 250 +Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for hearing on +April 22, 2010, at 8 45 A M before the Honorable David F [REDACTED] at Palm Beach +County Courthouse 205 North Dixie Hwy Room 9C West Palm Beach Florida 33401 + +**EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT +ROTHSTEIN** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to Local Rule No 4 a good faith attempt to +resolve the matters set for hearing has been attempted but an agreement has not been +reached between parties as of the date of this notice + +2010 APR 16 PM +PAY R BOL +FILE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U S Mail to the above addressee this 15th day of April , 2010 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253 0164 F + +By + +RobertP Griffon Jr + +Florida Bar #224162 + +Michael J Pike \_.., + +Florida Bar #61729 + +(Counsel for Defect Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Plaintiffs Moto \* \e + +( S H\ + +Cr + +A S' 1741V + +A÷ % i i . i \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0a082e52e9a1fa52355d41f45d4bd922cd6574f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541/EFTA02759541.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759541.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1910, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 479.19599999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 479.19599999999997, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.292, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 302.13 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 239.292, + 315.09000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 514.3499999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759541" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e10935e947c8cdb0a39c36fddc1079316a20cdd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.md @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +2010 APR 16 PM 4:47 +4-PARON R. BOCK CL +14 BRANCH CON. CL +CONFIDENTIAL + +**MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), move to strike the affidavit of Defendant, Scott Rothstein filed in support of his Motion to Set Aside Default, and states: + +1. 1. Epstein filed the instant action against Rothstein and others on December 9, 2009. +2. 2. Rothstein was the former Chairman and CEO of the now defunct law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Rothstein was indicted and pled guilty to five counts including racketeering, money laundering and fraud related to a massive Ponzi scheme he conducted through RRA. +3. 3. On December 14, 2009, Rothstein was served with the summons and Complaint in this action. +4. 4. On December 31, 2009, Epstein filed a Motion for Default due to Rothstein's failure to respond to the Complaint. +5. 5. A default was entered by the Clerk on January 21, 2010. + +- 6. Rothstein filed a Motion to Set Aside Default on February 17, 2010. +- 7. On March 8, 2010, Rothstein filed an affidavit in support of his Motion to Set Aside Default (attached as Exhibit A). +- 8. On March 9, 2010, a hearing was conducted on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default and the Court deferred ruling so the parties could conduct discovery related to the motion (3/9/10 Order attached as Exhibit B). +- 9. The Court re-set the hearing on Rothstein's Motion Aside Default for April 30, 2010. +- 10. Epstein set the deposition of Rothstein to cj r pril 15, 2010 (notice attached as Exhibit C). +- 11. On April 9, 2010, Mark Nu S 'Siu el for Rothstein, wrote the zi undersigned essentially stating that he could not produce Rothstein for deposition because he is detained in the Fedefal,Bureau of Prisons (correspondence attached as Exhibit D). cx..4' ) +- 12. Mr. Nurik directed the undersigned to coordinate Rothstein's deposition with U.S. Attorney Pat)! As Rothstein's counsel, Mr. Nurik is in a far better position to wor 'th to produce Rothstein for deposition. Indeed, Mr. Nurik was\ • provide Rothstein with his affidavit and obtain his notarized signature despite-Ills-detention in prison. +- 13. On the other hand, Epstein's counsel has contacted U.S. Attorney via letter and telephone to attempt to coordinate Rothstein's deposition, but to no avail. + +14. Since it appears that Epstein will not have the opportunity to depose Rothstein relative to his affidavit prior to the April 30, 2010 hearing, Epstein requests the Court strike said affidavit. + +15. It would be inequitable to permit Rothstein to rely on his self-serving affidavit without Epstein having the ability to question Rothstein relative to same. + +16. The Court specifically deferred ruling on the Motion to Se e Default so the parties could "conduct discovery relative to this motion." See. it B. + +17. Epstein, through no fault of his own, has been pro'hi9ifecYfrom conducting said discovery. The Court should not consider Rothstein's affidavit in a vaccum in determining Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default and therefore requests the Court strike said affidavit. + +18. In Jordan v. Statement Farm Ins. Co., 515 So. 2d 1317, 1319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), the court struck plaintiffs affidavit in opposition to defendant's summary /- judgment. The Second District Court of Appeals concluded that "it [was] evident that the statements in the affidavit contradict the testimony in deposition and [ ] the trial court was correct in striking the affidavit." + +19. Her , Epstein does not even have the opportunity to elicit testimony from Rothstein relative to his affidavit. Admission of the affidavit "is a matter within the sound discretion-of-the court." See West Town Plaza Associates. Ltd. v. Pines Properties, inc., 800 So. 2d 477, 478-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Scott v. NCNB Nat'l Bank of Fla. 489 So. 2d 221, 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). + +20. For the foregoing reasons, the Court should strike Rothstein's affidavit. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court strike the affidavit of Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in support of his Motion to Set Aside Default and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 15th day of April, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Counsel to Scott Rothstein +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556F + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)* + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I. 11. I bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009 CA 040800 MOCX/vIB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT STEIN, + +J. , and LM, + +Defendants. + +#### AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION T RQTEIN IDE DEFAULT + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) ss.: COUNTY OF ) ?, SH\ , + +Before me, the undersi who after being by me first \*Ify, personally appeared, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, on oath, deposes and states as follows: + +- 1. I am a fendann the above-captioned matter. +- 2. I not spond to the Summons and Complaint in this lawsuit because I did not have know < ar)tts existence until February, 2010. In February 2010, I learned that this lawsuit g against me and that a default judgment had been entered against me for failure to respo +- 3. From December 1, 2009 until March 1, 2010, I was detained at the Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida. + +EXHIBIT A + +On March I, 2010, I was transferred to the Port St Lucie jail. + +4. During that time frame I was pulled out of my cell many times by the Bureau of Prisons staff to receive service of lawsuits at all hours. + +5. Inasmuch as the Bureau of Prisons rules and regulations do not allow a prisoner to hand any documents to any visitors, including counsel, upon service of various lawsuits, I simply informed my attorney who would then look up the case with the appropriate court and contact the attorney for the plaintiff(s) in such cases and/or take whatever app ("pate action was necessary. + +6. To the best of my knowledge and belief, I do not fecalI being served with this lawsuit. If I was properly served with this lawsuit, it misplaced within the pile of numerous lawsuits and voluminous amount of other I and has not been located. Even to date, I have not located the Complaint or Plain on for Default.2 + +7. I state in good faith that if al knowledge of this lawsuit I would have advised my attorney as I have done us other lawsuits currently pending against me. + +8. As soon as I 1 o e lawsuit, I immediately contacted my attorney and advised him of same which m ted the filing of my Motion to Set Aside Default and this Affidavit in Support the? I V + +9. ha a viable defense to the allegations contained in the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein' ff" or "Epstein"), Complaint. Without providing a detailed response to the Complai herein, just one of many meritorious defenses to the Complaint is that at least one, if not more, of the lawsuits against Plaintiff which he references as the basis of this instant lawsuit (the "Civil Actions"), was filed with the court on behalf of certain clients by a defendant herein, a "), prior to his employment as an attorney at the law firm Rothstein Rosenfe]dt Adler ("RRA"). The fact that prior to his employment with RRA, and prior + +2 Since learning of this lawsuit, my attorney obtained a copy of the Complaint. + +to our introductions with one another, already had client(s) suing Epstein in Civil Actions, goes against several counts in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, the RICO count. In fact, the Civil Actions filed by [REDACTED] and/or other attorneys at RRA were and are *real* cases, with *real* plaintiffs that have *real* claims against Epstein and, this instant lawsuit is Plaintiff's feeble attempt to take advantage of my unfortunate circumstances to disqualify claims by real persons that deserve to have their day in court. + +10. I respectfully submit that if the Court were to disallow my Motion to Set Aside Default, not only would I be extremely prejudiced inasmuch as I have viable defenses to the allegations contained in Plaintiff's Complaint, but the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions that [REDACTED] and others at RRA filed against Epstein which he references in his Complaint in this matter would be prejudiced as well. A default entered against me in this matter would have the same effect as my admission to the assertions made by Plaintiff which would, in essence, allow Epstein to prevail against the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions on the basis that they are frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits, which they are not. + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing affidavit and the facts stated in it are true. + +![]()STATE OF FLORIDA ) +St. Lucie County )ss.: +) + +BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally appeared SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who after being by me first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the Defendant in the above-styled cause; that he has read the foregoing Affidavit and the facts contained herein are true and correct. + +![]()SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 28th day of March, 2010, by SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who is personally known to me or who has produced St. Lucie County Sal I.Q. as identification. + +![]()![]()My commission expires: + +![]()7 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants.. + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Scott Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/ +denied deferred pending an appeal out +hereby to be Parties are given Cause to +maden't discovery in regard the Motion + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 3rd day of Mar., 2010 + +*[Handwritten signature]* + +David F. [REDACTED] +Circuit Judge + +EXHIBIT B + +Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +*CC: JEDA* + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, ind'vi y, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +A + +Defendants. / C + +## NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION + +To: See Service List below + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the deposition via video of: + +## DEPONENT DATE & TIME LOCATION OF DEPOSITION + +Scott Rothstein c/o Marc S. Nurik, Esq.. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +April 15, 2010 10:00 a.m. + +Prose Court Reporting 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1500 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +upon oral examination, before Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mal to the following addressees on this 71\-day of , 2010: + +90-1131T + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. +Page 2 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq.. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +*Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +*Attorneys for Defendant* [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq., +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 - Fax +*Attorneys for Defendant, L.M.* + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +![]()cc: Prose Court Reporting which will also provide Videographer service + +# Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone (954) 745-5849 +Fax (954) 745-3556 + +Marc S. Nurik +Admitted to Practice in +Florida and New York + +Of Counsel: +Julio E. [REDACTED] +Admitted to Practice in +Florida and New York + +Writer's Email: +marc@nuriklaw.com + +April 9, 2010 + +## BY EMAIL & U.S. MAIL + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Re: Epstein v. Rothstein, et al +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Dear Mr. Critton: + +I am in receipt of your letter and Notice dated April 5, 2010 scheduling the deposition of my client, Scott Rothstein, for April 15, 2010 in connection with the issues associated with our Motion to Set Aside the Default. + +Please be advised that as my client is currently pre-trial detained in the Federal Bureau of Prisons system, I have no control over, or ability to, arrange for his appearance at any particular location. + +Furthermore, due to the unique circumstances of my client's incarceration, I suggest that any effort on your part to schedule my client's testimony in connection with the Motion to Set Aside the Default be directed to the United States Marshal's Service with a copy to me. In an effort to be as helpful as possible, I suggest that you try to contact Assistant United States Attorney Paul [REDACTED] (954-356-7255) for further direction. + +Please be advised that at the present time, any questions relating to the subject matter of my client's criminal case will result in my client invoking his 5th Amendment privilege. + +Please contact me if you have any other questions concerning this matter. + +Sincerely, + +![]()Marc S. Nurik + +EXHIBIT D \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2dee63805ac1b06e46a492763692785908188688 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543/EFTA02759543.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,754 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759543.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 16252, + "elapsed_seconds": 80.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.36199999999997, + 82.863 + ], + [ + 557.612, + 82.863 + ], + [ + 557.612, + 120.52799999999998 + ], + [ + 318.36199999999997, + 120.52799999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.05200000000002, + 312.20099999999996 + ], + [ + 484.88, + 312.20099999999996 + ], + [ + 484.88, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 162.05200000000002, + 326.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.132, + 167.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 387.26599999999996, + 167.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 387.26599999999996, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 264.132, + 181.44 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I. 11. I bENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.344, + 86.314 + ], + [ + 562.0780000000001, + 86.314 + ], + [ + 562.0780000000001, + 130.862548828125 + ], + [ + 311.344, + 130.862548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT \nIN SUPPORT OF MOTION T \nRQTEIN\nIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.82999999999998, + 336.038 + ], + [ + 480.7350769042969, + 336.038 + ], + [ + 480.7350769042969, + 366.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 181.82999999999998, + 366.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.204, + 99.12 + ], + [ + 508.48600000000005, + 99.12 + ], + [ + 508.48600000000005, + 154.56 + ], + [ + 292.204, + 154.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.148, + 331.8 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 331.8 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 345.24 + ], + [ + 93.148, + 345.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.376, + 77.6875 + ], + [ + 534.4764404296875, + 77.6875 + ], + [ + 534.4764404296875, + 121.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 288.376, + 121.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.98800000000003, + 327.4375 + ], + [ + 449.9044494628906, + 327.4375 + ], + [ + 449.9044494628906, + 342.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 207.98800000000003, + 342.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.958, + 424.866 + ], + [ + 161.41400000000002, + 424.866 + ], + [ + 161.41400000000002, + 438.274 + ], + [ + 89.958, + 438.274 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEPONENT DATE & TIME LOCATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.91999816894531, + 424.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 546.659912109375, + 424.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 546.659912109375, + 439.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 91.91999816894531, + 439.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.254, + 424.866 + ], + [ + 362.38399999999996, + 424.866 + ], + [ + 362.38399999999996, + 438.274 + ], + [ + 276.254, + 438.274 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.132, + 631.852 + ], + [ + 391.5652770996094, + 631.852 + ], + [ + 391.5652770996094, + 646.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 264.132, + 646.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.38199999999998, + 56.213 + ], + [ + 445.32399999999996, + 56.213 + ], + [ + 445.32399999999996, + 85.57799999999999 + ], + [ + 184.38199999999998, + 85.57799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY EMAIL & U.S. MAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.76800000000001, + 259.251 + ], + [ + 208.626, + 259.251 + ], + [ + 208.626, + 271.836 + ], + [ + 86.76800000000001, + 271.836 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759543" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f0b8373e5b83dc5d341bf93d871c903bfa24106 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +THIS CAUSE having come before this Court upon Defendant, L.M.'s Motion for Protective Order, and the Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, it is hereby: + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the Motion is granted +without prejudice to the Plaintiff to establish +release and discoveries of the information + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 19th day of April, 2010. + +![]()Copies furnished to: +Brad [REDACTED] +Jack Scarola +Robert Critton, Jr. +Mark Nurik +Jack Goldberger + +at speed st here \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4cb288a8d1926c4865910fdc0ac39b09f12c99f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555/EFTA02759555.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759555.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 871, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.284, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 310.284, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38000000000001, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 484.704, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 484.704, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 70.38000000000001, + 370.98 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759555" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d232133150e18e836e0754926b4efe61d50f67ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG \*4, •co, + +s,; c r-73 so .1) v\* e'en' • 2-scrn'a oes D?'" So rn + +O + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECnOCUMENTS ONLY + +To: See Service List below + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the deposition duces tecum of: (see attached subpoena duces tecum) + +| DEPONENT | DATE & TIME | LOCATION OF DEPOSITION | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
c/o James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq.
Berger Singerman, P.A.
200 South Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 1000
Miami, FL 33131 | May 19, 2010
4:00 p.m. | Prose Court Reporting
101 NE 3 rd Avenue
Suite #1500
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 | + +upon oraTexamination, before Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. +Page 2 + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. + +Mail to the following addressees on this 16th day of April, 2010: + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 - Fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] Edwards + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94a2d46cbb5c1e59c05202f46dd7c5424494a76a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556/EFTA02759556.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759556.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3127, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.53000000000003, + 80.16 + ], + [ + 521.6644287109375, + 80.16 + ], + [ + 521.6644287109375, + 123.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 277.53000000000003, + 123.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECnOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.46000000000001, + 330.66 + ], + [ + 528.17431640625, + 330.66 + ], + [ + 528.17431640625, + 345.8000183105469 + ], + [ + 108.46000000000001, + 345.8000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.028, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 154.008 + ], + [ + 259.028, + 154.008 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759556" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf8682500da02583dd3f6a9a67ec25638c1d7bd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.md @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + + n-7• %::\$ . . ..ap — 3:.• rn Cn S- + +S ". -4mt r- • Ar i s: r + +# EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +m r rn C + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(b), moves for an enlargement of time to respond to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. (.. ") Request to Produce and states: + +- 1. On March 18, 2010, Edwards served Epstein with a Request to Produce (attached as Exhibit A). +- 2. As the Request to Produce was served via U.S. Mail only, Epstein's response to thereto is currently due on or before April 22, 2010 +- 3. The first request seeks documents upon which Epstein relies in support of his claim- for damages against , including all agreements with attorneys, invoices for attorney services, time records, and documents related to expenditures. + +See Exhibit A. + +- 4. The second request seeks prescriptions for corrective lenses. See Exhibit A. Epstein has no objection to said request and is attaching the responsive document as Exhibit B. + +5. Epstein requests a thirty (30) day enlargement of time to respond to the first request in Request to Produce. Epstein's counsel is currently reviewing documents potential responsive to ' first request and determining all applicable objections including work product and attorney-client privilege. In addition, to the extent Epstein may produce documents responsive to ' first request, his counsel needs additional time to redact any such documents to preserve attorney-client and work product privileges. + +6. This action is set for trial on the Court's October 25, 2010 docket and will not be prejudiced by the requested enlargement of time. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(b), requests the Court grant a thirty (30) day enlargement of time to respond to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradle ( \, J. onEdwards' Request to Produce and grant Y any additional relief the Court dee "s ame just d proper. + +# rtificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY t t-i true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 20th day of April , 2010: + +Jr., Esq. iii, Jaffe, Weissing, & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. Fistos + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik & Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +686-6300 + +383-9424 F + +Attorneys for Defendant + +(954) 745-5849 + +(954) 745-3556F + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +(561) 842-2 + +(561) 25 ax + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +o.- D. Critton, Jr. + +Florida Bar #224 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar + +(Counsel for Def\ fftey Epstein) + +C \*) + +drawings, graphs, charts, \*"Documents" shall incl ut t be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from whic ormation can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the req is cted through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system meta 1 inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems--e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF -THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMRAG + +### -,,,... DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO Y EPSTEIN + +Defendant/CounterplaintiffM J. Ed Iliic, d through the undersigned counsel, (ra of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit to inspect cop c ch of the following documents\*: request, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Flo + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty (30) days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +- 1. All documents\* upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + +a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whosJviees are alleged as an element of damages; + +b. All invoices for attorney services and cos ged as an element of damages; + +c. All time records reflecting dered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + +d. Every can whatever kind or des tiwi dCkleal receipt, ledger entry, and other document of fleeting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every expenditure by u or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages.( S u + +2. all prescriptions for corrective lenses issued to you within the past five + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by + +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this St day of March 2010. + +ola + +ar No.: 169440 + +y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shi ley, P.A. + +39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Defendant/Co + +J. EDWAIt + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, et al +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-524-2820 +Fax: 954-524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +![](_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg) + +The Eye Center + +DR. ROBERT A. [REDACTED] +DR. JAMES E. MORRIS +DR. ARNOLD M. SEMEL +DR. STEPHANIE N. [REDACTED] +DR. LAN NGUYEN +OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS + +1732 UNIVERSITY DRIVE +PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA 33024 +TELEPHONE: (954) 432-7711 + +R FOR M Epotein, Jeffrey 10/02 20 09 +ADDRESS \_\_\_\_\_ + +0.D. +1.75-25 x 131 + +0.S. +2.25-50 x 101 + +Prog + +A00 ++2.25 + +DAVIS +0000393 + +MORRIS +0000171 + +SEMEL +0000228 + +S. [REDACTED] +0003363 + +L. NGUYEN +0003705 + +PD-59 +(pupil Distance) + +00 4 +64.50 + +450 Remarks + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +EX 000 B \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66293fb1d5ffc7c2e708e35fe586d429990a15d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/EFTA02759558.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,406 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 7418, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.61, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.344, + 82.6875 + ], + [ + 551.0818481445312, + 82.6875 + ], + [ + 551.0818481445312, + 123.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 311.344, + 123.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.5, + 313.875 + ], + [ + 477.7537536621094, + 313.875 + ], + [ + 477.7537536621094, + 342.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 159.5, + 342.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "rtificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 457.54800000000006 + ], + [ + 377.99005126953125, + 457.54800000000006 + ], + [ + 377.99005126953125, + 472.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 472.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "-,,,... \nDEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S \nREQUEST TO PRODUCE TO Y EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.934, + 307.1015625 + ], + [ + 465.74, + 307.1015625 + ], + [ + 465.74, + 345.7330627441406 + ], + [ + 186.934, + 345.7330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.806, + 71.23 + ], + [ + 371.95399999999995, + 71.23 + ], + [ + 371.95399999999995, + 85.476 + ], + [ + 278.806, + 85.476 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759558" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba063630043c5fc28b99563729997d414e667725 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759558/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:753d97989490119663ee790e992b4c8709e596c105b72af86bd799027cb3690f +size 4668 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f905f5402c0a2d13c2b8de6040e17b486d92422c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN\$ND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLONDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408005600003Ad cil + +## MOTION PURSt.C ACi T c F.S. O7.105 + +Defendant, L.M., moves this Honorable Court for the imposition of sanctions pursuant to the provisions of F.S. §57.105 on the basis that the Plaintiff and his counsel knew or reasonably should have known that the Plaintiff's claims against L.M., when initially presented to the court or subsequent thereto: + +- a) were not .supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claims and/or the defenses; or +- b) were not and would not be supported by the application of then existing law to those material facts. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy Aof the foregoing has been PP" furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on rvtarski• 2010. + +> Gary M. Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax Attorneys f efendant L.M. + +ary M. rmer, J . torida r No.: 914444 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion Pursuant to F.S.§ 57.105 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c653d88c59727a1f04ab2613ecdb56aa75dd5065 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566/EFTA02759566.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759566.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2150, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN$ND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLONDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.17699999999996, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.3575439453125, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.3575439453125, + 126.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 310.17699999999996, + 126.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION PURSt.C ACi T c F.S. O7.105", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.882, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 414.60992431640625, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 414.60992431640625, + 398.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 197.882, + 398.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.197, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.1364440917969, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.1364440917969, + 142.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 225.197, + 142.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.792, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 276.792, + 141.75 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759566" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f15a5464d2b14b371484e67c7e98615e37b7cab9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED +2010 APR 22 PM 3:53 +JHAROH R. BOCK CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion to Strike Affidavit of Scott Rothstein, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Motion is hereby granted/denied +However, the Motion for Removal of Defendant will +be postmonted for 30 days to alleviate the +Plaintiff to obtain discovery as to the Affidavit. + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 20th day of April, 2010 + +*[Handwritten signature]* + +David F. Crow +Circuit Judge + +Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2317c190de5347ed71e522d44759cb5352f966df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569/EFTA02759569.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759569.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1751, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 480.41999999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 480.41999999999996, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.16, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 498.7799999999999, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 498.7799999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 319.95000000000005 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759569" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..13e637b0bf975432188aa1f572f3108b87e13cf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc''~\$TNurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fg.dIaLderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. , JR., ESQ., , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 140P West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thattlys ollowing motion will be called up for hearing on May 5, 2010, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +..i. , nO .7.1- + +c h) i.; I:2 + +## EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO EDWARDS' REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt to resolve the matters set for hearing has been attempted but an agreement has not been reached between parties as of the date of this notice. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 23rd day of April , 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) -0164 Fax + +(561) 253842-2820 + +,COAA' + +Robert D. Cr on, Jr. + +Florida Bar 224162 + +Michael J. ike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Plaintiffs Motion ti udge + +( S \N + +O + +CiS \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5bfc9258e6c1d2de4d209f7060105723f799158 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570/EFTA02759570.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759570.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1835, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.53000000000003, + 82.02600000000001 + ], + [ + 494.9421691894531, + 82.02600000000001 + ], + [ + 494.9421691894531, + 139.447021484375 + ], + [ + 277.53000000000003, + 139.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 316.386 + ], + [ + 382.60552978515625, + 316.386 + ], + [ + 382.60552978515625, + 331.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 331.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND \nTO EDWARDS' REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.98, + 503.03700000000003 + ], + [ + 518.5742797851562, + 503.03700000000003 + ], + [ + 518.5742797851562, + 531.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 133.98, + 531.6870422363281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759570" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..653acf48822fef4b3c647459335b18ba69419fae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AO + +"Da: oft C>: !NO O rn O + +## NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING + +j40—minute Special Set) + +(THIS WILL CANCEL THE APRIL 30 2010 3:30 P.MiPECIAL SET HEARING, as per Judge instrtetio .) + +To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark/S. Nunk, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. JR., ESQ., , Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for a special set hearinrfor 40 minutes on June 4, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm each, Flo( 01: + +## DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEININ + +Pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt was made prior to the hearing on this motion to resolve this matter with opposing counsel. + +The following procedures must be noted on all specially set hearing notices in Division AG: + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by electronic mail (e-mail) and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 26th day of April , 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +Robert D. ritton, Jr. + +Florida B r #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar 10617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Defendant Rothstein's Motion to Judge Also enclosed is Plaintiff's Motion fo ntry of Default and Clerk's Entry of Default. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32057a585d2f40f65ca1a72a516476624c95faa2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572/EFTA02759572.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759572.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2487, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.61699999999996, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 515.9180297851562, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 515.9180297851562, + 112.17852783203125 + ], + [ + 261.61699999999996, + 112.17852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 408.85107421875, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 408.85107421875, + 288.80853271484375 + ], + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 288.80853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE \nDEININ", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.186, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 465.32806396484375, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 465.32806396484375, + 540.8085174560547 + ], + [ + 120.186, + 540.8085174560547 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759572" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b62434e5e51d597097c79881d7e8bde246ff56ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH +COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M., Individually. + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK-CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL/PROBATE +2010 APR 27 AM 8:55 +FILED + +**NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL** + +NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all parties that JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE of the law firm of ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER, & WEISS, P.A. hereby enters his appearance as co-counsel for the Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in this cause. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail to the following addresses, this 21st day of April, 2010. + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556 Fax +Attorney for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Gary [REDACTED], Esquire +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], +Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +(954) 524-2820 +(954) 524-2822 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart +& Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +(561) 686-6330 +(561) 383-9424 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Robert Critton, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +--- + +JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE +Florida Bar No. 262013 + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c3d275f0bbba559bee6c3a9c0d6a20415993840 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574/EFTA02759574.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759574.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1897, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.25, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 517.771, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 517.771, + 112.72900000000001 + ], + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 112.72900000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.20899999999997, + 360.084 + ], + [ + 435.82599999999996, + 360.084 + ], + [ + 435.82599999999996, + 373.871 + ], + [ + 174.20899999999997, + 373.871 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759574" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44fa3ed01952d91387467caa17a8fd2f397986e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +2010 APR 27 PM 4:2 +EARON R. BOCK +REFERENCE FILED + +FILED + +**REQUEST FOR COPIES** + +COMES NOW the Defendant, ██████ J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351(e), hereby requests that Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, produce by mailing to Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, immediately upon receipt, any and all records received pursuant to their Subpoena Duces Tecum returnable May 19, 2010 issued to: + +Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. +c/o James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 27TH day of April, 2010 + +*[Handwritten signature of Jack Scarola]* + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, ██████ + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbtuy, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +ME, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP Attorney For. Jeffrey Epstein 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820 Fax: (561) 844-6929 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52bfc5cf244392cac387b3b78f44732a23f5aa76 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576/EFTA02759576.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759576.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2153, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.465, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 526.269, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 526.269, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 300.465, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR COPIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.83899999999997, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 364.80699999999996, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 364.80699999999996, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 228.83899999999997, + 324.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 346.265380859375, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 346.265380859375, + 163.10302734375 + ], + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 163.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759576" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f87ba9da6ada5a46b821d96404b5f1bc7124cfa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.md @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003O9CXMBAG + +. n 5503! r" -- C • 0 O co r- -, Fri O ca + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE AND SUPPORTING LEGAL AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO COUNTERDEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, J. ME, files this Response and Supporting Legal Authorities in Opposition to/ PlaingPtounterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim for Abuse of Process and states: + +Epstein is a convicted felon having entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he effectively conceded his having engaged in illicit sexual activity with a large number of female children. (See Counterclaim at ¶4) A large number of his victims have filed civil suits, many of which remain pending and which potentially subject Epstein to large judgments for both compensatory and punitive damages. (Counterclaim at ¶5) clients, including L.M., are among those victims who continue the prosecution of their claims against Epstein. (Counterclaim at ¶7) Epstein has no substantive defense to these claims, as he has repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer any substantive questions regarding his + +sexual exploitation of his minor victims. (Counterclaim at ¶6) Epstein has employed the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning or compromising their legitimate claims. Id. Epstein has initiated claims against Edwards and L.M. for the sole purpose of intimidating L.M. and others to abandon legitimate claims against Epstein or to coerce them into settling these claims for less than their value. (Counterclaim at ¶9) Epstein's Complaint alleges that was a knowing participant in a civil theft and criminal enterprise. (Counterclaim at ¶10) Epstein is well aware that there is no evidence to support these false assertions. Id. Epstein's actions in filing his baseless lawsuit are tantamount to extortion and form the basis for Edwards' Counterclaim for abuse of process. + +Judgment on the pleadings should be granted only where the Court concludes, based upon the pleadings alone, that the movant rly entitled to judgment as a matter of law, after taking every fact alleged by th n ne' -> ) ding party as true and all facts alleged by the moving party and denied by the n-moeparty as false. See Harris v. Kearney, 786 So. 2d 1222, 1225 (Ha. 4th DCA 2001). in most instances, a motion for judgment on the pleadings will end up being much the.same, in practice, as a motion to dismiss, although made after an answer is served.' + +The pleadings in this case establish a cause of action for abuse of process. A cause of action for abuse of process requires proof of the following elements: (1) the defendant made an illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; (2) the defendant had an ulterior motive or purpose + +Epstein previously filed a Motion For More Definite Statement and/or Motion to Dismiss with respect to M. Counterclaim. The motion was denied. While the prior motion did not raise the same grounds raised herein, it is worth noting that this Court previously determined that Counterplaintiffs Counterclaim could stand. + +in exercising the illegal, improper or perverted process; and (3) the plaintiff was injured as a result of defendant's action. Della-Donna v. Nova Univ., Inc., 512 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In an abuse of process action, process may mean an action that is initiated independently such as the commencement of a suit, or one initiated collaterally, such as filing of a counterclaim. Peckins v. Kaye, 443 So. 2d 1025, 1026 (F gravamen of the cause of action involves the use of process to purpose for which it was not designed. Id., see also Scozar (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The usual case involves some f 751, citing Bothmann v. Harrington, 458 So. hment or the A 1984). The lish some wrongful e, 546 So. 2d 750, 751-52 ortion. Scozari, 546 So. 2d at 63, 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The allegations contained in Counterclaim, which must be taken as true for purposes of deciding a motion for judgment on the pleadings, establish these necessary elements. The Counterclaim alleges that Epstein has commenced a lawsuit against for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate and his clients, including L.M., into either abandoning or settling legitimate claims fot less than their just and reasonable value. (See Counterclaim at ¶ 9 and 11) The Comiterclaim also alleges that Epstein's Complaint has no basis in law or fact and that Edwards has been injured as a result. (Counterclaim at ¶¶ 10 and 12) + +acknowledges that there is no abuse of process when the process is used to accomplish the result for which it was intended, regardless of an incidental or concurrent motive of spite or ulterior purpose, such as harassment. Scozari, 546 So. 2d at 751. However, in this case, it is alleged that the claims against for participating in a civil theft and criminal enterprise have no factual basis or legal merit whatsoever (i.e. Epstein's lawsuit was not filed to + +accomplish the result intended (to either prevail or settle a meritorious claim). Indeed, Epstein completely ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. (Counterclaim at V 0) This is one manner in which the cases cited by BEM are distinguishable. Additionally, many of the cases cited by Epstein note that &mere filing a complaint with an ulterior motive of harassment will not alone con se of process. However, Counterplaintiffs allegations involve more than mere ment, they involve allegations of an attempt by Epstein to coerce into ising the legitimate claims his clients have against Epstein for molestation. Even the cited by the Counterdefendant recognize that allegations of a coercive or collateral effect, like the kind set forth in counterclaim, will be sufficient. For example, in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v Ferre, 636 F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985), the Court notes that an improper motive is not sufficient and explains that what is needed is i gation of a collateral, coercive effect. Quoting McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 21 08, 1 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), the Ferre Court states that: + +An abuse of process arises only when there has been a perversion of court processes to accomplish some end which the process was not intended by law to accomplish, or which compels the party against whom it has been used to do some collateral thing which he could not legally and regularly be compelled to do. \ — + +The case of Scozari, supra is instructive. In Scozari an attorney was sued for abuse of process after filing an action to impose an equitable lien and lis pendens against the home of his clients former live-in boyfriend who had left the state with the couple's child. 546 So. 2d at 751. The Third District held that summary judgment should not have been entered where the lawyer's own testimony indicated that he filed the action at least in part as a bargaining chip. The Court noted: + +If there was a reasonable basis in law and fact to initiate the judicial proceedings, then these processes were justified even though they may have served some other collateral purpose. However, if there was no reasonable basis in law and fact to bring the action to impress a lien on property, and this was done without any reasonable justification under the law and to force or compel thy\_ appellant to resolve some custody dispute, induce the appellant to pay money, or tic up the appellant's property, then there has been an abuse of process. (emphasis added). + +Id. at 752. Likewise, the counterclaim in this case alleges duit Epstein filed this action with no reasonable basis in law or fact in order to force or ards to resolve other pending cases against Epstein. See also, Bothmann, supra, 8 So. 2d at 1169, n 8 (noting that in an abuse of process claim, the improper purpose usually takes the form of coercion to obtain a collateral advantage, not properly involved in the proceeding itself, such as the surrender of property or the payment of money, by the use of the process as a threat or club). Based upon the foregoing authorities, the pleadings in this matter set forth a cause of action for abuse of process and Epstein's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings must be denied. + +Epstein has also moved for summary judgment on abuse of process claim. It is axiomatic that summary judgment may not be granted unless the moving party is able to show that no genuine issues of material fact exist. Payne v. Cudjoe Gardens Property Owners Ass'n, Inc., 837 So. 2d 458, 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Epstein has failed to establish an absence of the disputed issues of fact created by the pleadings. Furthermore, summary judgment is premature because discovery is not complete. Epstein just answered the counterclaim on March 15, 2010. Where discovery is not complete, the facts are not sufficiently developed to enable the trial court + +to determine whether genuine issues of material facts exist. Id., see also v. Star, 510 So. + +2d 637, 639 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1987). As the court noted in Payne, supra, 837 So.2d at 461: + +Where discovery is not complete the facts are not sufficiently developed to enable the trial court to determine whether genuine issues of material facts exist. See v. Star 510 So.2d 637, 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Thus where disco, still pending the entry of summary judgment is premature. See v. 734 So.2d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)("Parties to lawsuit are entitled to discovery as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure including the taking of depositions and it is reversible error to enter summary judgment when discovery is in progress and the deposition of party is pending."); 702 So.2d 616, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(reversing the entry of Summary Judgment where depositions had not been completed and request for the production of documents was outstanding); Collazo v. Rupert 693 So.2d 631, 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(holding that a trial court should not entertain motion for summary judgment while discovery is still pending); Spradley v. Stick 622 So.2d 610, 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). + +See also, Brandauer v. Publix upermarkets, Inc., 657 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1995)(abuse of discretion to gran judgment where opposing party has not had an opportunity to complete discove + +Wherefore, the Defertdant/Counterplaintiff, J. respectfully requests this Court to enter an Order denying Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim for Abuse of Process. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff's Response and Supporting Legal Authorities in Opposition to Counterdefendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion for Summary Judgment + +Page 7 of 8 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 3rd day of May, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2439 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +Case No.: 502009CA040800)OCXMBAO + +Defendant/Counterplaintiffs Response and Supporting Legal Authorities in Opposition to Counterdefendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion for Summary Judgment + +Page 8 of 8 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire + +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-842-2820 + +Fax: (561)-844-6929 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +\_, q , Jaffe, Weissing, et al + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: 954-524-2820 + +Fax: 954-524-2822 + +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: 954-745-5849 + +Fax: 954-745-3556 + +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfd9cfc541b3b4e874fb0229e105c581e0c40cba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578/EFTA02759578.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,366 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759578.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 12517, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.46, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 526.5284423828125, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 526.5284423828125, + 119.22802734375 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 119.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE AND SUPPORTING LEGAL \nAUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO COUNTERDEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR \nJUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT \nON COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 531.398193359375, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 531.398193359375, + 380.22802734375 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 380.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.51199999999997, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 346.9140319824219, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 346.9140319824219, + 160.10302734375 + ], + [ + 252.51199999999997, + 160.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759578" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf51a701a977ce3fe47fff59961c1ee607c55ed1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.md @@ -0,0 +1,1239 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Motion to Compel ██████████ To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this Motion to Compel Defendant, BRADLEY J. ██████████, for follow-up deposition. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: + +I. Introduction + +As this court is aware, attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations to the administration of justice, deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, actionable frauds, and the orchestration and conducting of egregious civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious injury to Jeffrey Epstein one of several targets of their misconduct and others. Rothstein and RRA's fraud had no boundary; Rothstein and his co-conspirators forged Federal court orders and opinions. Amongst the violations of law that are the subject of this lawsuit are the marketing of non-existent Epstein settlements and the sanctioning of a series of depositions that were + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL/FROBATE +2010 MAY 10 PM 5:25 + +FILED + +Page 2 + +unrelated to any principled litigation purpose but instead designed to discover extraneous private information about Epstein or his personal and business associates (including well-known public figures) in order to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein. formerly of RRA, represents three (3) of the alleged JJ s. The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil litt n strategy that was unrelated to the merits or value of their clients' cases and, ins as its improper purpose the furthering of Rothstein's misrepresentations and deceit to`third party investors. As a result, Epstein was subject to abusive investigatory tactics, unprincipled media attacks, and ,fr\i/ unsupportable legal filings, some of which either knew about and/or participated in as the attorney for the Jane does. + +#### IL ( 'Motion to Compel + +1. On March 23, 201B/th &signed took the deposition of It is believed that is eithea maj player in the Rothstein/RRA scam or a partner of that firm knew or should have known that Rothstein was scrupulously marketing alleged Epstein 7 settlements based upon the lawsuits filed by three (3) Jane Does (Le., Jane Doe, LM and EW). Jane Doe is filed in the Southern District of Florida, and LM and EW are both filed in the Circuit Court in an\d'for Palm Beach county, Florida. Notably, represented Jane Doe, LM and EW well before he accepted his gainful employment with RRA and continues to represent them today. + +#### (a) The Costs Incurred B RRA and The Financial Arran ement Between RRA and + +2. Based upon the allegations of fraud as set forth in the Complaint, it is imperative that Epstein know the financial arrangement between and RRA relative to the three (3) + +Page 3 + +Jane Doe cases brought from his small private practice ("Brad P.A.") to RRA, which Rothstein feverishly marketed as part of his ponzi scheme. Epstein is entitled to know if Mr. ever received any bonus monies for bringing over the three Jane Doe cases and the exact amount of costs incurred by RRA and Brad P.A., and which RRA 'apparently = agreed to reimburse Mr. for after becoming a partner with RRA. Morvirer, as set forth infra, despite deposition testimony, Epstein has now learned that MI had five (5) Epstein related cases, not three (3) as he testified. Accordingly, Epstein is entitled to learn any financial arrangement relative to those cases including, but not limited to, whether salary was structured in a manner to bonus him for transitioning the Jane Doe cases over to RRA. + +3. For instance, at his deposition, Edwards testified that there were only three (3) cases brought from Brad P.A. to RRA. See Exhibit "A," deposition at pp. 12-13, 92, 158-59, & 152-153. MoreoVer, he appeared to be unsure as to what "costs" meant, but later testified that the costs in lved I1 litigating the three (3) cases totaled between \$300,000 and \$500,000 dollars. E xit.bit it,"A" at pp. 158-59, 175-177 & 196. + +4. Sin Edw s' deposition, Epstein learned that had five (5) Epstein related cases wh t Epstein learned this information by way of an agreement entered into betwarthe Bankruptcy Trustee for RRA and current law firm, which agreement identifies each of the five (5) Epstein related matters by the figure - "5%." (the "Agreement"). See Exhibit "B." Moreover, it appears from the Agreement that and his current law firm have agreed to reimburse the Trustee for costs and expenses incurred in litigating each of the Epstein matters (i.e., all five), which means that must now know the exact amount of costs incurred in litigating the five (5) cases by virtue of having entered into the Agreement. + +Page 4 + +Id. Since the costs and the number of Epstein related cases go to the heart of this litigation, Plaintiff is entitled to depose on those newly found and relevant topics. Certainly, based upon his deposition testimony (or lack thereof) regarding the number of Epstein related cases he was involved in while at RRA, Epstein is entitled inquiry into same. These inquiries go to the heart of Epstein's damages claim. + +5. Likewise, Epstein is entitled to know whether ever received any form of compensation for transitioning the other two (2) cases he failed to address at his recent deposition including, but not limited to, whether the salary he agreed to accept had any assort of monetary component related to the Epstein cases and which attorney objected to on the grounds of "economic privacy." Exhibit "A" a'r(72-74. Defendant's objections should be overruled in this regard. See Lg., Friedman v.'Heart Institute of Port. St. Lucie, Inc., 863 So.2d 189, 194-194 (Fla. 2003)(disclosure cral information can only cause irreparable harm in a case in which the information iirstot ' re ant). [W]here materials sought by a party would appear j to be relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, the information is fully discoverable." Id. at 194. See atEpste'in v. Epstein, 519 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The financial ( IN \ information sought here is clearly relevant. + +#### (b) Topic Specific Obiections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and Should be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to is ew Filed Affidavit + +6. Michael Fisten was an investigator working for RRA, and is currently believed to be employed by a current firm. Exhibit "A," pp. 110-111, 128-129. + +7. The undersigned asked Mr. to discuss certain information related to the Epstein investigation, which was met with several work-product objections by a counsel. + +Page 5 + +See Lg., Exhibit "A" at pp. 169-171, 185-186. counsel made clear that would not answer "any questions" related to the alleged investigation done by Fisten and other investigators. Therefore, it was clear that despite the fact that Mr. and Mr. Fisten discussed Epstein and the Jane Doe matters with Rush of the NY Daily regarding the Epstein matter, he would not be answering any questions regarding whaAR en \_ specifically discussed with Mr. Rush because that was work-product. However, subsequent to deposition, Michael Fisten filed the Affidavit attached hereto as Exhibit "C". According, to the extent any privilege attached to the topics outlined in Mr.- Fisten's Affidavit, same no longer exists as the affidavit is now being used for te purposes. Kailas v. Carnival Corporation, 2008 WL 2222152 at \*4-6 (S.D. 08). Montana Land and Mineral Owners Assoc., Inc. v. Devon Energy Corporation, 20 WL: 1876859 (D. Mont. 2006)(use of affidavits for testimonial purposes waives wor :pro fit). Accordingly, Mr. should be compelled to return for deposition to disettis their Fisten's Affidavit and the topics outlined therein, and any objections as to work-product relative to Michael Fisten as it pertains to his involvement with Rush,4hould be waived and should be compelled to testify to same. + +8. oath, should be compelled to return to deposition to testify, under Omation set out in his Affidavit attached hereto as Exhibit "D". No privilege can attach o a publicly filed document, and Mr. did not fully recall at deposition the information that was later delineated in his Affidavit. Exhibit "A" at pp. 134-146 and 151-154. Accordingly, a more detailed inquiry is required for those same reasons set out above. + +# III. The Leeal Standard + +9. In sum, nothing in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure forbids a second discovery deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) and Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.280. + +10. As defined by §90.401, F1a.Evid.Code, "relevant evidence is Oncence tending to prove or disprove a material fact." "Relevancy describes evidence tha itimate tendency to prove or disprove a given proposition that is material as shown pleadings. [It is] a tendency to establish a fact in controversy or render a n more or less probable." Zabner v. Flow K. of Fla., 227 So.2d r 'la. 4th DCA 1969). It is equally well settled that "the concept of relevancy is in the discovery context than in the trial context" and a party may be permitted to di relevant evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, so long as it is reasonablypale a to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 1.280(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2 + +Wherefore, Epstein reques that this court grant the relief requested herein, including, but not limited to, at return for a second deposition, waiving the objections asserted by as identified above, and requiring him to testify to the subject matter outlined he d for any additional and further relief as the court deems just and proper. + +# Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to it ft' the following addressees on this lu day of May, 2010: + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-745-5849 954-745-3556 Fax Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant Bradlept Edw + +k + +Gary M.=, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, ate S, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524- Fax Attorn Pendant, L.M + +Shipley Aikt c ;\Alan Goldberger, Esq. Ae rbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 50 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 842-282 (561) 253-01 + +By: obert D. t tton, Jr. Florida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) 1 for or with. + +2 Q. Did she work with you at all at RRA? + +3 A. In some limited capacity, maybe. + +4 Q. Did she ever work on any of the -- you 5 have three cases that you ever filed -- or let me 6 strike that. + +7 There are three cases th in 8 existence at the current time. One Doe 9 versus Mr. Epstein which is, is ed 1 court case 10 and the Plaintiff's name is J . That is one 11 of your cases, correct? + +12 A. Correct. + +13 Q. Or one of t e m's cases at the current 14 time? Ag arl + +15 A. Cor e t + +16 Q. Ther s another case versus L.M. Versus 17 Jeff re Ep in and a third called E.W. versus 18 Jef a pstein, correct? + +19 Yes. + +20 Q. And as a result all three of those cases 21 currently now are firm cases, the Jaffe firm 22 cases? + +23 A. Yes. + +24 Q. Did Mrs. Williamson work on any of those 25 cases? + +![](_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg) + +1 A. In what time period? What's your question? + +2 3 Q• I'm sorry. During the time that you were associated with RRA, did Mrs. Williamson work on 4 those cases? + +5 A. Without you needing to ask 20 differ t 6 questions to get to your answer, I will tel y her 7 involvement was that after federal moti e drafted, 8 she was the person to literally file he ion. That 9 is her only involvement with the a ile at RRA + +10 Q. She basically filed,~tkee rough the Pacer 11 system? + +12 A. Exactly. -C11\1 + +13 Q. Prior to o ing at , Jaffe by 14 whom were you em And by employed I mean in, 15 in a broad se ou could have been an 16 independent cofactor. You could have been.a 17 partne "could have been an employee. + +18 The law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler. + +20 + A. I believe April of 2009. + +19 When did you start working for RRA? + +21 Q. Beginning of April? + +22 A. Yes. + +23 Q. I saw a pleading that was filed yesterday 24 and it was either E.M., I am sorry, L.M. or E.W. 25 that looked like there was a change of -- I'm sorry, 1 Q. During the time that you were a 2 practitioner working on E.W, Jane Doe, whichever of 3 the three cases that you had, did you keep time 4 records? + +A. Some. + +6 Q. Do you keep time records on cont\* en 7 cases generally, or did you during that eriod? + +8 A. It's my intent to. + +9 Q. Okay. Same would be t wiTh, when you 10 were at RRA, did they have a ogram? + +11 A. They did have aiN ogram. + +12 Q. Did you inpu time that you spent on 13 the Epstein related s 7 + +14 A. That w quirement of the firm. + +15 Q. Oka you would have been put down 16 whatever ime spent, whether it was a 17 contin nc ee case or an hourly case; is that 18 corcit + +19 For the most part; that's correct. + +20 Q. During the time that Mr. Howell has been 21 associated with the case, does he provide you with 22 time records as to the work or the amount of work 23 that he has done on the case?. + +24 A. No. + +25 Q. Okay. Does he keep track of his time that + +1 A. I didn't do that. + +2 Q. You didn't. Did you choose not to do 3 that? + +4 A. No. I, I, the statement was made to me by 5 Scott Rothstein that the costs would be reimbur ed. And 6 I anticipated that the costs would be reimbu . I was 7 there for a fairly short period of time an didn't 8 know Scott Rothstein personally. So, 't go to him 9 additionally to tell him something t e already had a 10 meeting of the minds about. + +11 Q. Well, how much in did yot have • 12 outstanding at the time f r cases, including 13 the Epstein cases when,Lj nt to the firm, TUUli, in 14 April of '09? + +15 A. I don Aq rthe t total. + +16 Q. 1/ \$100,000? Was 000? Was it \$50,000? Was it + +18 A Mfpre than 100. + +19 And did you have that both from, was it, 20 t was that comprised of both your own money 21 id as well as LOC, line of credit money through a 22 bank? + +23 A. Correct. + +24 Q. Was it more.than 150? + +25 A. I'm not sure. 1 Q. Was it someplace between 100 and \$200,000 2 your best estimate? + +3 A. That is my best estimate. + +4 Q. Did you find that to be a significant 5 amount of money? + +6 A. Of course. Aimc + +7 Q. Okay. And you said you were at for 8 only a short period of time. In fact ere 9 there April, May, June, July, August tember, 10 October. You were there seven true? + +11 A. Yes. + +12 Q. Okay. And at ' , even though 13 Mr. Rothstein said he ou eimburse those funds or 14 the firm would rei se hose funds to you, at no 15 time during tho months which you have 16 described as (t t period of time, did you ever 17 18 make a reIl est that you be reimbursed; is that lIr V correc + +19 20 ting reimbursed, but I never made a formal 21 equest. I said it to, at least to Adler on 22 - several occasions. And it was always told to me, don't 23 worry about it; the firm is growing; there is a lot of 24 things to deal with right now; he operates under the 25 system of fairness; you will get reimbursed. I never made a, well, I don't know the process 1 A. I'm not sure. + +2 3 4 Q. Why would you -- did any of your clients claim or have any of your clients claimed to have any contact with Ghislaine Maxwell at all? + +5 A. That is something that certainly calks for 6 attorney-client privilege and not something ISat I am 7 going to be answering today. g glo, + +8 Q. With regard 9 to at least you ttended the deposition of both Jane Doe and .M, correct? + +10 A. Yes. + +11 12 13 Q. Okay. And have yo them reference Ghislaine Maxwell during '12 rse depositions? of those + +14 A. No. + +15 16 17 the two t 18 19 20 have r clients -- let's take a look at testified. Both of the two that have t,estiRied, Jane Doe and L.M. have testified th did not ever take, travel with or were orted in any way by Mr. Epstein, correct? Q. Would~t correct statement that none of the three + +21 A. No, that is incorrect. + +22 Q. Okay. Did, who, which? + +23 A. I believe. + +24 Q. I am sorry? + +25 A. I guess the transcript will speak for itself. 1 I don't remember their specific -- + +2 Q. Is it your belief that Jane Doe ever 3 traveled with Mr. Epstein on his plane? + +4 5 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, is the question limited to the testimony -- + +6 MR. CRITTON: Correct. AgitAllAr + +8 MR. CRITTON: Correct. + +9 10 11 THE WITNESS: No. I do no b ieve she testified that she travele h Mr. Epstein on his plane. + +12 BY MR. CRITTON: So' + +13 14 15 true? Q. All right. AlCi re L.M., she did not tiff that she traveled with Mr. Epstein on his would be true with + +16 that's true as well. A. I + +17 18 19 info Do M. traveled on Mr. Epstein's plane? Are you aware of any other Q. tio from any other source that either Jane + +20 ( 3 No. • + +21 22 23 24 25 fashion, in any other manner? + Q. Did you, did you indicate to -- well, let .me strike that. Did you tell Mr. Rush that none of your clients had ever traveled with Mr. Epstein on his plane or any, on his plane or with him in any + +MR. SCAROLA: -- that has been en? + +with Mr. Epstein's cases? + +2 A. No. + +3 Q. Since you left the firm have you requested 4 any type of detailed billing or cost analysis such 5 as to the cost of any of the costs that were AL A 6 incurred on any of Mr. Epstein's cases? + +7 A. Of course. + +8 Q. Okay. And did you receive tht sts? 9 Did you receive that information? + +10 A. Yes. + +11 Q. And what costs hav A 12 cases, in the Epstein cas ciated up -- let me 13 strike that. What cos t is the total amount 14 of costs that were cu ed in the Epstein cases 15 during the time s t ose files existed in the RRA 16 firm? incurred in the + +17 MR. OLA: If you're able to answer 18 t at eTstion with 19 hout specifying any of the specific cost 20 Qxpenditures, then I think we can answer that 21 question only as to amount. regard only as to amount + +22 THE WITNESS: And the question as to the 23 aggregate in the three cases? + +24 MR. CRITTON: Correct. + +25 THE WITNESS: Because I can't delineate + +1 for you. + +2 MR. CRITTON: Your best estimate. + +3 THE WITNESS: Okay. I believe more than 4 \$300,000. + +5 BY MR. CRITTON: + +6 Q. With regard to, if investigation w one 7 on, on a Epstein case, was the investigate ha ged, 8 that is for his time, as an example Mr. n, if 9 he did work in California would his Ce9 I'm not 10 11 a cost to c talking about his expenses, woul t be billed as the file? + +12 A. I don't know. + +13 14 15 approximately \$3 that's been spent on the 16 Epstein file, able to look -- Q. strike me On the that. cost If received, well, let rstood it, up to 300,000 + +17 A. It w d be more than that. I am just saying 18 it's at. 1 t \$300,000. + +19 Something between three and \$400,000, 20 d t -- + +21 A. Something that I would say is definitely 22 between 300 and \$500,000, but I'm not sure. It could be 23 301. It could be 450. I really don't know. + +24 Q. When was the last time that you looked at 25 that ledger or the printout associated with the + +(561) 832-7500 PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. (561) 832-7506 + +Electronically signed by cyrithla (601-051.976-2934) Electronically signed by cynthla (601-051-976-2934) Electronically signed by cynthla (601-051-976.2934) 2c29412d4712-4170-9de2-0511tf76c2ea + +1 Epstein files? + +2 A. I have never looked at the printout. + +3 Q. Okay. How, how do you know what is amount 4 is then? That is how do you have the estimate of it 5 being between 350, I'm sorry between 300 and 6 \$500,000, the cost associated with Epstein? + +7 A. I asked a paralegal within my c 4-nt firm for 8 the total amount of costs on these thre s that is 9 being claimed by Rothstein Rosenfeld er. And I 10 11 remember the cost number me reflecting an amount 11;:) in the egate A(b what ' told you. being given to + +12 Q. Have you request 13 strike that. Did she s 14 she -- did you actu 15 reflects the breaded of the costs from the 16 trustee? 4SiN,r py of the had, that is ceive a document -- let me did that + +17 A. ~I peleednally have not seen that. + +Ip 18 Has your firm received it? + +19 I don't know. + +20 I assume -- would it be a correct 21 22 only the time between April of '09 and October of 23 that the three to \$500,000 is, includes '09 when you were with the firm? + +24 A. It's a good question. I, I believe so. + +25 Q. And approximately, prior to joining the + +1 Q. Okay. And the support, how many floors 2 did RRA occupy in the Fort Lauderdale -- + +3 A. I believe six. + +4 Q. And approximately how many square feet on 5 each floor? + +6 A. I don't know. A lot. AkiAr + +7 Q. More than 10,000 square feet on 1% h 8 floor? + +9 A. I don't know. + +5 !) 10 Q. And what was the supp taff at the time 11 that you were there approxi + +12 A. In quantity or + +13 Q. Quantity, t r of people. + +14 A. I don't w. 77'lot of people. + +15 Q. Did y 16 all or were y ny hourly billing yourself at ictly a contingency fee person? + +17 A. 90 percent contingency. + +18 • with regard to the monies that were -- 19 se and apart from the Epstein, Epstein cases 20 a at least you now know that they cost between 21 hree and \$500,000, you were, I assume, incurring 22 other expenses on other cases, true? 23 A. True. + +24 Q. All right. And where did you, where did 25 you think that the money was coming from; that is, + +#### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscoults.itov + +IN RE: CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA.,I CHAPTER 11 + +40A + +Debtor. + +#### MOTION TO APPROVE AGREE BETWEEN THE CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE AND GARY F. STEVEN R. JAFFE, MATTEW D. WEISSINC, B J. MARK S. FISTOS AND SETH M. LEHRMAN + +Herbert Stettin ("Stettin" or "Trustee"), th em,14/\ hat 11 Trustee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Alder, P.A. ("RRA" or "Debtor"), seeks app a s ement agreement between the Trustee and Gary F. = Steven R. Jaffe, M eissing, Brad J. Mark S. Fistos and Seth M. Lehrman (the "Attorneys' the payment of legal fees to the Trustee, on behalf of RRA, related to certain otion"), and in support says. + +#### Background + +- I. This case was commenced as an involuntary chapter 11 proceeding on November 10, 2009, b4r petitioning creditors. [D.E. 1]. O The Court entered an Order for Relief on November 30, 2009. [D.E. 66]. On November 20, 2009 this Court entered an order directing the appointment of a trustee. [D.E. 30]. On November 20, 2009, the United States Trustee's office selected Stettin as the Trustee in this case. P.E. 35]. On, November 25, 2009, the Court ratified Stettin's appointment as Trustee. p.E.ssj. + +The address and last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., is Las Olas City Centre, 401 E. Las Olas Blvd, Suite 2270, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (TIN 7961). + +![](_page_18_Picture_12.jpeg) + +4. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2). + +5. The statutory predicates for, and rules applicable to the relief sought in this Motion are 11 U.S.C. § 1108 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019. + +6. As set forth in the settlement agreement attached as Exhibit A (the "Agreement), the Attorneys, prior to the commencement of this case, and as employees of RRA, represented clients in certain matters who the Attorneys continue to represent in those matters, although no longer employees of RRA. The Trustee asserts, on behalf the estate, an entitlement to a certain percentage of any legal fees received in those matters and reimbursement of costs paid by RRA in relation to those matters. + +7. The Trustee and the Attorneys have agreed to a resolution of the payment of legal fees regarding such matters as set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement, following a judgment, settlement, or other disposition of the cases listed in the exhibits to the Agreement, the Attorneys will (i) reiznicturse the Trustee for costs and expenses incurred by RRA in each matter and (ii) pay !riiN,Trustee a percentage of the net legal fees for each matter. The percentages of legal fees are dependent on the type of case, as described in paragraph 2 of the -• • • . Agreement. + +•••••••••••• + +# Relief Requested and Basis Therefor + +8. The Trustee seeks approval of the Settlement pursuant to Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. + +9. Rule 9019(a) provides that, after notice and a hearing, a court may approve a proposed settlement of a claim. The decision of whether or not to approve a compromise is + +within the sound discretion of the court. In re Carson, 82 B.R. 847 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1987); In re Mobile Air Drilling Co., 53 B.R. 605 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1985). + +10. In passing on proposed settlements, the standard that courts applied under the former Bankruptcy Act is the same standard as courts should apply under the Bankruptcy Code. In re Leather, Inc., 44 B.R. 457, 466 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1984). tated by the Supreme Court in Protective Committee v. S 300 U.S. 414 (196 der the Act, to approve a proposed settlement, a court must fmd that the settleme air and equitable" based on an educated estimate of the complexity, expense, and li ly ation of . .. litigation, the possible difficulties of collecting on any judgment which might be obtained and all other factors relevant to a full and fair assessment of th • m of the proposed compromise. Protective Committee, 300 U.S. at 424. + +/1/4 11. This test was adopted by tbE1 \en th Circuit in In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd, 898 F.2d 1544, 1549 (11th Cir. 1990), which provides additional guidance as to whether a compromise should be approved. /Justice Oaks established a four-part test for approval: + +- (a) The probability of success in litigation; +- (b) The difficulties, if any, to be encountered in the matter of collection; +- (c) The complexity of the litigation involved and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily attending it; and ---- (d) The paramount interest of the creditors and a proper deference to their reasonable views in the premises. + +\ - + +Id + +12. The Agreement satisfies the Justice Oakr standard. + +13. The Trustee believes that the expense, inconvenience and delay that would be caused by litigating the estate's entitlement to legal fees and costs and expenses regarding the relevant cases would not be in the best interest of the estate. The Agreement provides the Trustee with an opportunity to resolve the issue on terms favorable to the estate. Therefore, after full and careful consideration, the Trustee believes that the Agreeme • in the best sulk interest of the Debtor's estate and its creditors. + +WHEREFORE, the Trustee respectfully requests the entry, of or !der (i) granting this Motion, (ii) approving the Agreement, and (iii) granting such otherkepts is just and proper. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the BAr 1A-lc ibt United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and that I am in t raabee with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2INcl (A . + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy oNe foregoing was served via Regular U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, fax, email and/or orr t delivery upon all parties on the attached Service List this 15th day of April, 2010.c + +27525604 + +Respectfully submitted, + +BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A. Attorneys for Alleged Debtor 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 1000 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 755-9500 Facsimile: (305) 714-4340 + +By: /s/ David L. Gay David L. Gay Florida Bar No. 839221 dgay@bergersingerman.com + +#### CASE NO.: SERVICE LIST 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Marianella Morales, Esquire Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors Avenida Francisco de Miranda Tone Provincial "A" Piso 8 Caracas, Venezuela (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +John H. Genovese, Esq. Robert F. Elgidely, Esq. Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq. Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA Bank Of America Tower at International Place 100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 4400 Miami, Florida 33131 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington, Office in the Grove Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 kcoffev@coffeYmirlinnton.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +The Honorable Herbert M. S ettm One Biscayne Tower Suite 3700 Two South Biscayne Eltitievard Miami, Florida 33131 (WA U.S. MAIL and EMAIL) + +John G. Bianco, Esq. John M. Muni, Esquire Tripp Scott 110 Southeast Sixth Street Fifteenth Floor Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301 inb@triposcott.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Alison W. Lehr, Esq. Grisel Alonso, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov Grisel.alonso@,usdoi.gov (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)A + +Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq. Sonn & Erez, PLC Broward Financial C 500 E. Broward B u Suite 1600 Fort Lauderda isonn(asonnerez. (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) a 33394 + +Office of the US Trustee 51 Southest First Avenue Suite 1204 Miami, Florida 33130 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Tew, Esq. Maynard Gollin, Esq. Tew- LLP Four Seasons Tower 15th Floor 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3407 ttf&tewlaw.com Imratewlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Conrad & Scherer, LLP 633 South Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 bs@conradscherer.com JSi Iver®conradscherer.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +#### CASE NO.: SERVICE LIST 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Michael D. Seese, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP 1 E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 mseeseQhinshawlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW 1st Avenue, if1114 Miami, Fl 33130 (Via U.S. Mail) + +United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail) + +Special Asst. U.S. Att IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Island Rd., Ste 340 Plantation, FL 33324-3906 (Via U.S. Mail) + +The Honorable Eric IL Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the U.S. 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting U.S. Attorney 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Fl 33132 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Daniel Mink Ovadia c o Re Levy Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mail) 14051 NW 14th Street Ais Ar c/o Watches, Inc + +William George Salmi! Moskowitz Mandell & Salim 800 Corporate Dr Ste 510 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334 wsalim@mmsslaw.com CF and EMAIL) + +: Anthony Gruppo 0 West Cypress Creek Road Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Anthonv.nru000@usi.biz (VIA EMAIL) + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com (VIA EMAIL) + +BAST AMRON LLP SunTrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 1440 Miami, Florida 33131 bamron@bastamron.com ibastabastamron.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +**SERVICE LIST** + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Mark Bloom, Esq. +John B. Hutton, Esq. +Greenberg Traurig, LLP +1221 Brickell Avenue +Miami, FL 33131 +[bloomm@gtlaw.com](mailto:bloomm@gtlaw.com) +[huttonj@gtlaw.com](mailto:huttonj@gtlaw.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Robert D. Critton, Esq. +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Roth & Scholl +Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq. +Attorneys For Creditor Blue +Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P. +866 South Dixie Highway +Coral Gables, FL 33146 +[jeff@rothandscholl.com](mailto:jeff@rothandscholl.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP +1401 East Broward Blvd +Suite 300 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[mfbooth@rmzlaw.com](mailto:mfbooth@rmzlaw.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Arthur C. Neiwirth, Esq. +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1400 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com](mailto:aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +The Florida Bar +Adria E. Quintela, Esq. +Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq. +Lake Shore Plaza II +1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130 +Sunrise, FL 33323 +[aquintel@flabar.org](mailto:aquintel@flabar.org) +[apascal@flabar.org](mailto:apascal@flabar.org) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Micheal W. Moskowitz, Esq. +800 Corporate Drive, Suite 500 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33234 +[mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com](mailto:mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Francis L. Carter, Esq. +Katz Barron Squitero Faust +2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor +Miami, Florida 33133 +[flc@katzbarron.com](mailto:flc@katzbarron.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +S. Shraiberg, Esq. +2385 NW Executive Drive +Suite 300 + +Boca Raton, Florida 33431 +[bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com](mailto:bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +Henry S. Wulf, Esq. +CARLTON [REDACTED] P.A. +525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +E-Mail: [hwulf@carltonfields.com](mailto:hwulf@carltonfields.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +EMESS Capital, LLC +c/o Bruce A. Katzen, Esq. +201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor +Miami, Florida 33131 +E-Mail: [bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com](mailto:bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com) +[iberman@klugerkaplan.com](mailto:iberman@klugerkaplan.com) + +**(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)** + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Ira Sochet, Trustee Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: pmhudson@arnstein.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: predmond(otsteamsweaver.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 350 East Las Olas Blvd Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: Michael.aoldberg(aakerman.com Eval.berizettaakerman.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +LMB Funding Group do Robert C. Furr, Esq. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 337W Boca Raton, Florida 33431 E-Mail: rfurr@,furrcohen.corf (VIA CM/ECF and EM + +A. Gordich, Melissa Alagna, Esq. 701 Brickell Ave Suite 1900 Miami, Florida 33131 Email: Email: )vlehssa.alagna@ruden.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Broward County Attn: Rollie N. Hawn, Esq. Government Center 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: hhawnabroward.org (WA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +# SERVICE LIST + +Steven J. Esq. Gray P.A. 1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 1600 Miami, Florida 33131 E-Mail — (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Peter F. Valori, Esq. DAMIAN & VALORI LL 1000 Brickell Avenue, S Miami, FL 33131 E-mail: valori (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Canon Financial Services, Inc. 158 Gaither Drive, #200 Mount I-aurel, NJ 08054 (Via US Mail) + +'technology Financing Services I, 201 Centurion Parkway North Jacksonville, FL 32256 (Via US Mail) + +Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Company 220 Alhambra Circle, Suite 500 Coral Gables, FL 33134 (Via US Mail) + +Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc. 1140 West Loop North Houston, TX 77055 (Via US Mail) + +Florida Department of Revenue 501 S. Calhoun Street Room 201 Carlton Building Tallahassee, FL 32399 (Via US Mail) + +#### CASE NO.: SERVICE LIST 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street Suite 210 Tallahaccee, FL 32301 (Via US Mail) + +Miami-Dade County Tax Collectors 140 West Flagler Street, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via US Mail) + +Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 (Via US Mail) + +THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. TITLEMAN, P.A. 440 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (Via US Mail) + +Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via US Mail) + +F. McGinn, Esq. Bartlett Feinberg, P 155 Federal Street, 9th oor Boston, 02110 ffin bostonbusinessla (VIA CM/ECF and E + +Darol H. M. E\* q. 99 Nesbit Sir Punta Gorda, FL 33950 dcarn@carr.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 bee@blankrome.com (VIA EMAIL) + +Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121 Boca Raton, FL 33432 rfcaolemanattornevs.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Mark S. Haltzman, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone, LLC 3600 Horizon Blvd, Suite 20 Trevose, PA 19053 mhaltzman lammruben com (Via Email and U.S + +## SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT + +TIILS SE! iLMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is effective as of April \_\_\_, 2010, by and among, Herbert Stettin, as Chapter 11 to ("Trustee") of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("Debtor"), and each of (1) GaryM. ; ("F Jaffe ("Jaffe"); OM Matthew D. Weissing ("Wasnig") (Iv) Brad J. (' v Mark S. Fistos ("Fistos"); and (vi) Seth M. Lehrman ("Lehrman Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos, and Lehrman are each individually referred to as an "Attorney' and jointly and sev y collectively referred to as the "Attorneys"). Trustee and the Attorneys are sometimes collectively referred to as the "Parties". + +# RECIT\_AIS: + +Whereas, on November 10, 2009 (the "Involuntary Date"), an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding was commenced against Debtor, in and for United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, styled "In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld:, & Adler, P.A.," Case No: 09-34791-RBR. + +Whereas, each Attorney represents he is and has been at all relevarit times, licensed and in good standing to practice law in the State of Florida. Each Attorney was previously employed by the Debtor, up to approximately the Involuntary Date. + +Whereas, while employed by Debtor, the Attorneys did and presently continue to represent clients of Debtor (each a "Client" and collectively the "Clients") in connection with certain legal matters (each "Matter" and collectively the "Matters"), as identified on Schedule A attached hereto. + +Whereas, while Trustee asserts on behalf of Debtor and Debtor's estate (as defined below) that Debtor and/or Debtor's estate possesses a charging lien on certain legal fees earned and costs expended by Debtor related to the Clients and Matters, the Attorneys conversely assert that neither Debtor nor Debtor's estate possesses such lien rights (the "Disagreement"); + +Whereas, notwithstanding the Disagreement, to avoid litigating this issue with Trustee, the Attorneys shall nevertheless pay Trustee for each Matter the amounts provided for in Section 2 below, upon the occurrence of a judgment, settlement or otherwise (as applicable, a "Money ")4 respect to each such Matter. + +Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and the agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree: + +- 1. Recitals. The above Recitals are incorporated by reference and constitute a part of this Agreement. +- 2. Percentage of Legal Fees and Costs The Attorneys and Firm hereby jointly and severally agree to pay (or cause to be paid by a third party) to Trustee [not later than five (5) business days after the earlier of receipt or control by the Finn and/or the Attorneys of the Net Legal Fees (as defined below) resulting from a Matter (as evidenced by the applicable Client executing, pursuant to a Money Event, a release in favor of the Firm and Debtor's estate, + +together with a closing/settlement statement pertaining to such Matter, or such other evidence which reasonably shows that the Finn and/or Attorneys are entitled to the Net Legal Fees for such Matter)], a sum of money comprised of: (i) an amount equal to the percentage described below of the Net Legal Fees for each Matter, and (ii) reimbursement of any and all costs and expenses actually incurred by Debtor in connection with the Matter. The Parties agree that the exact percentage of Net Legal Fees to which Trustee is entitled depends on the category of each such Matter, and includes: (a) 10% on all qui tarn cases; (b) 25% on all class action (c) 5% on all "Epstein" related cases, (d) 10% on all other cases initially generated by and (e) 20% on all other cases that do not otherwise fall within subsections (a) through (d) above. In order to account for all Matters, the Attorneys have prepared Schedule A, attached to this Agreement, which they represent and warrant comprises a full, accurate and complete list of every single Matter that they worked on while employed by the Debtor and which is subject to this Agreement, as well as the category of the Matter as described above in this Section. The term "Net Legal Fees" shall mean the gross legal fees and expenses due and payable to any of the Attorneys and/or Firm upon a Money Event, in connection with each Matter, less all amounts duly owed (pursuant to written agreement made available to Trustee), and actually paid, to a referring, unaffiliated law firm(s). In connection herewith, the Attorneys represent that any such law firms shall be entitled to receive all amounts paid pursuant to the preceding sentence. + +3. Stipulation of Charging Liens. Notwithstanding the Disagreement concerning whether or not Trustee is entitled to file charging liens against and in respect to each Matter, to avoid litigating the issue with Trustee, the Attorneys have agreed to pay Trustee the sums listed herein. + +4. Update of Status. Fanner shall update Trustee from time to time, as to the status of each Matter, approximately once a month. Also, EMI shall promptly provide copies to Trustee of all documents referenced in Section 2 above. + +# 5. + +(a) ,Amendment This Agreement cannot be amended orally or by a course of conduct or course of dealing, but only in a writing signed by all parties hereto. + +(b) Waivers. The failure of a party to require performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect his right at a later time to enforce same. No waiver by a party of any condition or of any breach of any term, covenant, representation or warranty contained in this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing. + +(c) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. + +(d) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. + +(e) Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective estates, heirs, legal representatives, successors + +(i) Approval of Bankruntcv Court. The parties understand and agree that the enforceability this Agreement and its terms are specifi \* ittot to the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. + +and assigns; provided, however that no assignment or transfer of this Agreement shall be permissible except (i) by operation of law, or (ii) pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court. + +(f) Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, no other provision hereof shall be affected thereby. + +(g) Jurisdiction and Ventre. Any litigation in connection with or relating to this Agreement shall be commenced in the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with and pursuant to the express provisions of the order approving this Agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, if applicable. + +(b) prevailing Party Pees. The prevailing party in any dispute litigated hereunder shall recover all attorneys fees, costs and expenses incurred by it, as determined by the Bankruptcy Court including expert witness fees, and post-judgment and appellate proceedings. + +' .2 (j) Debtor's estate. The term "D' ebtor's estate", as used in this Agreement, shall have the meaning described in 11 U.S.0 54, + +/ 14/ (k) Term. The term of\this greement shall commence on the date first written above (subject to Section 5(9 above) and shall terminate upon payment by the Attomeys to Trustee of the applicable groin and owing from the last Money Event to occur, in connection with a Matter. + +IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto bave caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the date first above written. + +es/N i Mark S. Fistos + +Trustee: + +By: + +Herbert Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, PA + +## JOINDER + +The undasi law finn (the "Firm") joins to this Agreement to evidence its unconditional consent and agreement to the terms, and further to advise Trustee that in the event any of the Attorneys fails to perform any of the obligations to which same are obligated es is set forth above, the undersigned Finn shall nevertheless cause such obligations to be promptly perfbnned on behalf of such failing Attorneys. + +arm: + +wards, tos & Lehrman, P.L. + +Br + +Name: + +Print: + +64 fxrif pop r pit ve. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the date first above written. + +#### Attorneys: + +Gary M. + +Steven R. Jaffe + +a + +Matthew D. Welasing + +Brad J. Edwards + +` + +S 1' + +Mark S. Fistos + +#### luta + +By: + +Herbert Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, PA + +## JOINDER + +The undersigned law firm (the "Firm") joins to this Agreement to evidence its unconditional consent and agreement to the terms, and further to advise Trustee that in the event any of the Attorneys fails to perform any of the obligations to which same are obligated as is set forth above, the undersigned Finn shall nevertheless cause such obligations to be promptly Z ned on behalf of such billingAttorneys. + +Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +By: + +Name: + +Print: + +# EXEUNT "A" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|-----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------| +| 1. | [REDACTED] | 09-210941 | [REDACTED] | Kept | [REDACTED] | 10% | | +| 2. | | 09-22776 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 3. | | 09-22777 | | Kept | BJE | EDWARDS | 10% | +| 4. | | 09-22803 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 5. | | 09-22778 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 6. | | [REDACTED] | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 7. | | 09-22781 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 8. | | 09-24683 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 9. | | 09-210669 | | Kept | BJE | [REDACTED] | 10% | +| 10. | | 09-22802 | | Kept-REJECTED | BJE | N/A | | +| 11. | 09-210694 | Kept-Settled at RRA-Funds in Trust RRA | BJE | N/A | | | | +| 12. | 09-22773 | Kept-REJECTED | BJE | N/A | | | | +| 13. | 09-210897 | Kept | BJE | JE | 5% | | | +| 14. | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | 10% | | | + +10% + +| - II ,t,it | Matter # Client | Statt4,2 | Attorney catenary | | +|------------|-----------------|----------|-------------------|-----| +| | • • 22786 | Kept | | | +| | | | EDWARDS | 10% | +| 16. | 09-22787 | Kept | | | +| | | | EDWARDS | 10% | +| 17, | 09-22788 | Kept | | | +| 18. | 09-23807 | Kept | | 10% | +| | | | EDWARDS | 10% | +| | | | EDWARDS | 10% | +| | I09-22783 | Kept | | | +| | | | E | 5% | +| 26. | / 09-23813 | Kept | | | +| 27. | 09-22794 | Kept | | | +| | I 227910 | Kept | | | +| 29. | 09-210896 | Kept | JE | | + +| | Matter # Client | Status | Attorney Category | | +|-------|--------------------|----------------------|-------------------|-----| +| 30. | 09.22796 | Kept WE | | | +| 31. | 09-227810 | Kept WE | JE I | | +| 32. | 09-22797 | Kept | 4 | 10% | +| 33. | 09.22801 | Kept aiElf | ) / | 10% | +| 34. | 09-22798 09-210662 | Kept Stayed at MA WE | EuWEE/ICTh' N/A | | +| 36. | | Kept | | | +| | 09-22784 | WE | JE SML | 5% | +| 37. | 09- | Kept | | | +| | | REJECTED | G SML | 20% | +| 38. | 09- | | | | +| | 210389 | Kept | | | +| | | | G | 20% | +| | 1 ...-) | Left/RSA | N/A SML | | +| | 201046 | Kept | | | +| | | SML | G | 20% | +| 41. | 09- | Kept | | | +| | | REJECTED Discharged | G | 20% | +| | 08-18789 | by client SML | N/A | | +| | 09-22376 | Kept | | | +| | 09- | SML Kept— Money In | G | 20% | +| | | RRA trust SML | G | 20% | +| 45. I | 09- | | | | +| | 2010103 | Kept | | | +| | | SML | G | 20% | +| | 09-23497 | Kept | | | +| | | SML Kept | G | 20% | +| 47. I | 09- | Money In | | | +| | | MA trust | G | 20% | + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|-----|----------------|-----------------|------------|-----------------------|----------|----------|-----| +| 48. | [REDACTED] | 09-23199 | [REDACTED] | Kept | SML | | | +| 49. | | 09-210610 | | Kept - Settled at FJW | SML | G | 20% | +| 50. | | 09-2010107 | | Kept | SML | | | +| 51. | | 09-2010108 | | Kept - REJECTED | SML | N/A | 20% | +| 52. | | 09-21063 | | Kept | SML | | | +| 53. | | 09-23901 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 54. | | 09-21067 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 55. | | 09-23184 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 56. | | 09-201062 | | Kept | SML | | | +| 57. | | 09-20640 | | Kept | SML | | | +| 58. | 09-2010610 | Kept | SML | | | | | +| 59. | 09-20480 | Kept | SML | G | 20% | | | +| 60. | 09-21146 | Kept - REJECTED | SML | | | | | +| 61. | 09-23224 | Kept | SML | G | 20% | | | +| 62. | 09-201067 | Discharged | SML | N/A | | | | +| 63. | 09-201068 | Discharged | SML | N/A | | | | +| 64. | 09-201069 | Discharged | SML | N/A | | | | +| 65. | 09-26008 | Kept | SML | G | 20% | | | + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------|---------------|---------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------| +| 66. | | 09-201072 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 67. | | 09-201074 | | Discharged | | N/A | | +| 68. | | 09-2010710 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 69. | | 09-20848 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 70. | | 09-24761 | | Rejected at RRA | SML | N/A | | +| 71. | | 09-201076 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 72. | | 09-201077 | | Kept - Money in RRA trust | SML | N/A | | +| 73. | | 09-210603 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 74. | | 09-201078 | | | SML | | | +| 75. | | 09-20487 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 76. | | 09-201079 | | Kept - Money in RRA trust | SML | G | 20% | +| 77. | | 09-201092 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 78. | | 09-201093 | | Kept - Settled at FJW | SML | G | 20% | +| 79. | | 09-23916 | | Kept - Money in RRA trust | SML | G | 20% | +| 80. | | 09-21066 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 81. | | 09-201099 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | +| 82. | | 09-21743 | | Rejected at RRA | SML | N/A | | +| 83. | | 09-210636 | | Kept | SML | G | 20% | + +| Case reference | Matter K Client | Status | Attorney | Category | 21 | +|----------------|-----------------|--------------|----------|-----------|-----| +| 84. | 09- | | SML | | | +| | 2101083 | Kept | | G | 20% | +| 85. | 09- | | SML | | | +| | 2101087 | Kept | | G | 20% | +| 86. | | Kept— | SML | | | +| | 09.20608 | RRA trust | | Alli\bifr | | +| 87. | | | SML | | | +| | 09-24440 | Kept | | | | +| | | | | G | 20% | +| | 09-20611 | Kept | Se | G | 20% | +| 89. | | | SML | | | +| | 09-22486 | Kept | | G | 20% | +| 90. | 09- | n2fC | MDW | N/A | | +| 91. | 09- | Kept —BI | MDW | G | 20% | +| | 210873 | Settlement | | | | +| 92. | n• | Kept —Only | MOW | N/A | | +| | 103 | to handle | | | | +| | " | RRA Trust | | | | +| 93. | 09-20476 | Referred | MOW | G | 20% | +| 94. | 08- | Kept -Funds | MDW | N/A | | +| | 1610110 | In RRA Trust | | | | +| 95. | 09- | Kept— | MDW | G | | +| | : 210886 | Referred | | | | +| 96. | 08- | Kept —for | MDW | N/A | | +| | 161016 I | purposes of | | | | + +| Case reference | Matter # Client | 51/taE | Attorney | Cateeory | N | +|----------------|-----------------|--------------|----------|----------|------| +| | 09-23172 | Took Case - | | | | +| | | Out —No | | | | +| | | | M | N/A | | +| | | Kept | W | G | 20% | +| 100. | 08-18140 | | | | | +| | | | MDW | G | 20% | +| 101. | 09-22487 | Kept | MDW | G | 20% | +| 102. | 09- | | | | | +| | | | MDW | G | 20% | +| 103. | | Kept - \$90K | | | | +| | | | MDW | G | 20% | +| 104. | 09- | | | | | +| | | Kept | MDW | G | 20%• | +| | 08-18444 I | | | | | +| | | | MOW | N/A | | +| | | Kept | MOW | G | 20% | +| 107. | 09-22046 | RRA— | | | | +| | | | MDW | N/A | | + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|------|-----------------------|-----------------|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------| +| 108. | | 08-18107 | | Kept – settled at RRA – funds in RRA – Trust | MDW | N/A | | +| 109. | | 08-17364 | | RRA- CASE – handled by Guardianship Attorney | MDW | N/A | | +| 110. | | 09-22703 | | CLIENT HIRED R. ADLER | MDW | N/A | | +| 111. | | 09-231080 | | CLIENT discharged RRA | MDW | N/A | | +| 112. | | 08-173910 | | Kept – then REJECTED | MDW | N/A | | +| 113. | | 08-20147 | | Kept – for purposes of disbursement of settlement funds only | MDW | N/A | | +| 114. | | 08-17037 | | Kept- Settled at RRA – RRA Trust funds \$31,086.22 | | N/A | | +| 115. | | 09-217102 | | Kept. | MDW | G | 20% | +| 116. | | 09-26023 | | Kept | MDW | G | 20% | +| 117. | | 09-2101063 | | Kept – THEN REJECTED | MDW | N/A | | +| 118. | | 08-161028 | | Kept - \$3K Settlement Funds in RRA Trust | MDW | N/A | | +| 119. | | 07-1101073 | | Kept | MDW | G | 20% | + +| Case reference | Matter e client | Status | Aflame./ | farm | 3 | +|----------------|-----------------|--------------|----------|------------|-----| +| 120. | 08- | Kept —then | MDW | N/A | | +| | 179103 | REJECTED | | | | +| 121. | 08- | Kept— | MDW | | 20% | +| | 184410 | Passenger in | | | | +| | | case above | S | | | +| 122. | 08- | Kept | 1 | Carve out | | +| | 161034 | | | based upon | | +| 123. | 08- | •' | MDW | Carve out | | +| | 09-20526 | GAL | GMF | G | N/A | +| | 08-18225 | PURSUED | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 126. | | LOST ON | | | | +| | 08-18471 | DISMISS | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 127. | | MERGED | | | | +| | 09-23720 | MATTER | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| | 08-18226 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 129. | | CLIENT | | | | +| | | NEVER | SRJ,ACN | | | +| | 08-19701 | RETAINED | ,IAN,ACR | G | N/A | +| 130. | | DISCHARGE | | | | +| | 09-20482 | D BY SFU | SFU,SML | G | N/A | + +# r/CRIBTT "A" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT + +| Case reference Mika, Client | Status | Attorney | Category | N | +|-----------------------------|-------------|----------|----------|-----| +| 08-18245 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| | | F,SML | | N/A | +| | D BY CLIENT | SFU,SML | | N/A | +| 09-25074 | IN SUIT | SRIdS | G | 20% | +| | \$15,000.00 | SRI | G | | +| | PU ,UED | SRI | G | N/A | +| | | SRI | G | | +| | | W,GMF | CA | N/A | +| | RRA | SFIJ | G | | +| " 09-24472 | | | | | +| | PURSUED | GMF | CA | N/A | +| 08-18253 | IN SUIT. | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18246 | IN SUIT | GMF | CA | N/A | +| 000035 | Kept | SRI, MDW | G | 20% | +| | DISMISSED | GMF | CA | N/A | +| | RRA | SRI | G | N/A | +| 08-18227 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|------|-----------------------|-----------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------|-----------------|------------------| +| 147. | | 08-18165 | | DISCHARGE D CLIENT AT RRA | SRJ | G | N/A | +| 148. | | 08-16521 | | IN SUIT | GMF / MDW | CA | 25% | +| 149. | | 09-24875 | | AMICUS BRIEF - PRO BONO | GMF | G | N/A | +| 150. | | 09-23918 | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,MSF,GMF,MDW,TRW | CA | N/A | +| 151. | | 09-22724 | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,GMF,MSF,SML | CA | N/A | +| 152. | | 09-23421 | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,MSF,GMF,SML | CA | N/A | +| 153. | | 08-19177 | | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 154. | | 08-18167 | | SETTLED AT RRA | SRJ | G | DISPURSED AT RRA | +| 155. | | 08-18775 | | DISCHARGE D AT RRA | SRJ,SML | G | N/A | +| 156. | | 08-19797 | | PRO BONO-GAL | GMF,SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 157. | | 09-23677 | | IN SUIT | GMF,SRJ,MSF,SML | G | 20% | +| 158. | | 08-19738 | | WITHDREW | GMF | G | N/A | + +L + +| Casereference st ma glint | Halo | Attorney | Category | N | +|---------------------------|-------------|----------|----------|-----| +| | GAL | GMF | | N/A | +| | D BY CLIENT | SRJ ,SM | | | +| 08-20200 | IN SUIT | | | | +| | | O S | | | +| | | GMF | CA | 25% | +| | PURSV | | CA | N/A | +| | cf takeED | | | | +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| | by Sri | SRJ,SML | PI | N/A | +| | RRA | SRI ,SML | G | | +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| 09-23146 | WITHDREW | | | | +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| 08-19749 | IN SUIT | | | | +| | | F | CA | 2S% | +| . 08-19747 | IN SUIT | | | | +| | | F | CA | 25% | +| 08-19795 | LOST CASE | | | | +| | | F | CA | N/A | +| | 5100,000.00 | SRJ | G | 20% | +| 171. I | | | | | + +| Case reference | Matter I .4 | REIM | Attorney | Catetory | | N | +|----------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---|-----| +| | 08-18176 | IN SUIT | SRI ,SAG | G | | 20% | +| | | RRA | SRI | a | | | +| | | | ,SAG,CCFsAll; | III14/ | " | N/A | +| | | | F , | CA | | N/A | +| | | PUF | SRJ | G | | N/A | +| | 08-18894 | IN SUIT | | | | | +| | | | ,GMF | CA | | 25% | +| | 08-20236 | IN SUIT | | | | | +| | | | F | CA | | 25% | +| | 08-19798 | IN SUIT | | | | | +| | | | F | CA | | 25% | +| | | RRA | SRI | G | | | +| 181. | | \$22,500.00 | | | | | +| | | ACCOUNT | SRLSML | G | | | +| 182. | | NOT | | | | | +| | | | F,SML | CA | | N/A | + +| Case reference Matter a Client | Status | Attorney | | | +|--------------------------------|----------|----------|-----|-------| +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| | IN SUIT | | | 25% | +| | | F,SML | CA | 25% | +| | F 'T FEE | SRJ,GMF | GAL | | +| | | F,SML | G | N/A | +| | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18228 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% i | +| | | F | CA | N/A | +| | PRE-SUIT | SRJ,SML | G | 20% | +| 08-19753 | PRO BONO | GMF | DP | N A | + +| Case reference Matter if • lent | Status | Attorney | Catezory | N | +|---------------------------------|-----------|------------|----------|-----| +| 09-20495 | PRO BONO | GMF | GAL | N/A | +| 08-18470 | LOST CASE | SRI,MSF | 4 .4. | N/A | +| | | F,M DW | CA | N/A | +| 08-18426 | IN S | | | | +| | | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18427 | | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18248 | IN SUIT | MU, MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-182 , | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18251 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18252 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| 08-18294 | IN SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| | | F,SML ,SCS | CA | N/A | +| | | F | CA | N/A | +| | FLAT FEE | GMF | GAL | | + +| Case reference atter I oleo | Status | Attorney | Category | S | +|-----------------------------|-------------|------------|----------|-----| +| 08-20253 | IN SUET | | | | +| | | F | A | 25% | +| | \$40,000.00 | SRC5IICZYG | | 20% | +| | RRAT, i | | | | +| | | SRJ | G | | +| 08-18229 | IT | | | | +| | | SFU,MSF | CA | 25% | +| | S r | | | | +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| 212. | DISCHARGE | | | | +| | RRA | SRJ,SML | G | N/A | +| 08-18230 | f N SUIT | SRJ,MSF | CA | 25% | +| | IN SUIT | SR1 ,SAG | G | 20% | +| | PURSUED | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 08.19796 | IN SUIT | | | | +| | | F | G | 20% | +| | RRA | SRI | G | | +| 218. | PRO BONO - | | | | +| | | F SML | DEF | N/A | + +| Case reference Matter 4 Client | etas"£ | Attorney | Category | N | +|--------------------------------|-------------|----------|----------|-----| +| | | F L | CA | 25% | +| | | F,SML | CA | N/A | +| 08-18178 | IN SUIT | SRI ,SAG | G | 20% | +| 09-257 IB | PRE-SUIT | SRI | G | 20% | +| OB- Y66 | | | | | +| | RRA | SRI | AA | | +| 08-19886 | WITHDREW | | | | +| | | F | CA | N/A | +| 09.25804 | IN SUIT | GMF | CA | 25% | +| | PURSUED | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 08-18145 | PRE-SUIT | SRJ,SML | G | 20% | +| 230. I | | | | | +| | \$50,000.00 | SRI | G | 20% | +| | | ,GMF | CA | N/A | + +L + +| | Case reference | Matter # | Client | Status | Attorney | Category | % | +|------|-----------------------|-----------------|---------------|---------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------| +| 231. | | | | | | | | +| | | | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 232. | | | | | | | | +| | | | | SETTLED | GMF,SRJ,MSF | CA | 20% | +| 233. | | | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,GMF,SML,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 234. | | | | | | | | +| | | | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,MSF | CA | N/A | +| 235. | | | | NOT PURSUED | SRJ,GMF,MSF,SML | CA | N/A | + +NOT A CERTIFIED + +| CaseRef Matter It | Status | Category | % | +|-------------------|---------------|----------|-----| +| 09-22920 | IN SUR | Q | 10% | +| 09.23420 | IN SUIT | Q | 10% | +| 09-22918 | IN SUIT | Q | 10% | +| | INVES11GAT1ON | Q | 10% | +| | INVESTIGATION | Q | 10% | + +Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 547 Filed 04/15/10 Page 33 of 33 + +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +IN RE APPLICATION TO QUASH + +SUBPOENA TO DAILY NEWS AND + +RUSH + +CASE NO. 10 M8-85 (LAK) + +# AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL FISTEN C + +1. I am an investigator employed by the law finn of-Farmer-Jaffe Weissing Fistos and Lehrman who has been assigned to work on the case brought by Jane Doe, seeking compensation for damages inflicted on her by Jeffrey Epstein. The case is Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-80893, and is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before being a private investigator, I spend thirty years in south Florida as a law enforcement officer. + +2. In pursuit of information related to the litigation against Jeffrey Epstein I had a conversation with Rush, a reporter with the New York Daily News, on October 22, 2009. + +3. I called Rush after I had become aware of him because he was giving information to an author about Jeffrey Epstein. The author told me that this was extremely valuable information for the civil case I was working one. The author said that Rush played a tape for the author and another person that was a recording of Epstein. I had the impression that Rush had played the entire tape for this author. The author said words to the effect, "My god, you've get this tape. He talks about the girls." The author told me that the admissions made by Epstein in the tape would be very helpful to the girls pursuing civil suits against Epstein. + +4. At this point, I called Rush in New York to try to get the tape. Rush had no hesitancy in telling me that he had tape recorded a recent conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and himself. + +5. Rush then began telling me in detail about the contents of the tape recorded call. + +6. Rush has previously spoken to attorney Brad (the attorney representing Jane Doe) and me concerning a story he (Rush) was writing on Jeffrey Epstein. Rush stated that he compiled very negativ ation n E stein concerning his exploits with + +![](_page_51_Picture_12.jpeg) + +underage girls and how he eluded the justice system. Rush stated that he presented the story to his publisher, who killed the story. He stated that his publisher, who knows Jeffrey Epstein, received a call from Epstein which resulted in him killing the story. + +7. Rush agreed to paraphrase his recorded interview of Jeffrey Epstein, providing me with the following highlights. He stated that Epstein spoke in a New York accent advising how he came from Brooklyn arid became wealthy. He stated that people do not like it when people make good and that was one reason he was being targeted. He stated that he did nothing wrong and went to j0 for no reason. He stated that the thne he spent in jail was too harsh of a sentence and if the same circumstances would have happened in New York he would have only received a \$200 fine. He continued by making very negative comments concerning Attorney Brad (the lead attorneisesenting Jane Doe), that he (Brad) was causing all his problems He referred to as an - ambulance chaser and his clients such as L.M. as a person that came to him as a prostitute and drug addict. He stated that all the girls suing him are only trying to get a meal ticket and the only thing he might have done wrong was to maybe-to cross the line a little too closely. Rush advised that Epstein was very upset that subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell, referring to her as a good person tha \ idecthing wrong. + +8. Rush advised that he was going toicaLten the tape again and provide me with additional information. Rush had no other inthrmation to offer. + +9. At no point during this phone call was I told that the discussion was "off the record" or otherwise confidential. I was never told that there was any agreement for secrecy. I had the clear impression that Rush knew I would be relay all of the information that he had provided to me to Brad and other attorneys and investigators working on Jane Doe's case and other similar cases. + +10. After I interviewed Rush, I asked for a copy of the tape of Epstein. He said he had no problem with doing that. He just had to run by his legal people. But later that day, he called me back and said "legal" would not let him give me the tape. + +11.On October 26, 2009, when my discussion with Rush was fresh in my mind, I wrote up a report memorializing what Rush had told me. + +12. Rush later sent me e-mails about the Epstein case, including forwarding to me an e-mail that Epstein had apparently written about the case. + +13.I have reviewed the affidavit of Rush, dated April 6, 2010, filed in this matter. That affidavit contains this statement: "I have not revealed any part of the contents of the Sn interview to anyone other than the individuals I have described here [i.e., Brad and three other individuals who met with Rush in New York], except for Anne Carroll, the attorney representing me in this proceeding." This statement + +7 + +is not accurate, as Rush gave me a detailed description of the Epstein tape recorded interview. + +14. I have been extensively involved in the investigation attempting to support Jane Doe's claims against Epstein. As part of my duties in investigating the case, I have attempted to locate all recorded statements made by Epstein regarding his sexual abuse of Jane Doe and other minor girls. I have not been able to locate any such recordings. Nor do I currently possess any investigative leads for tracking down such recordings. + +I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. + +FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. + +Dated this 23rd day of April, 2010. + +![]()The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23rd day of April, 2010 by MICHAEL FISTEN, who is personally known to me. \_\_\_\_\_ + +![](_page_53_Picture_63.jpeg) + +![]()Print Name: \_\_\_\_\_ + +My Commission Expires: + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, J. and LM, + +Defendants. + +# AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) ss.: COUNTY OF + +A + +Before me, the undersign a , personally appeared, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who after being by me first d swo on oath, deposes and states as follows: + +- 1. I am a De t in the above-captioned matter. +- 2. I not reond to the Summons and Complaint in this lawsuit because I did not have know) existence until February, 2010. In February 2010, I learned that this lawsui ed against me and that a default judgment had been entered against me for failure to respond. +- 3. From December 1, 2009 until March 1, 2010, I was detained at the Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida. + +![](_page_54_Picture_14.jpeg) + +On March I, 2010, I was transferred to the Port St. Lucie jail. + +4. During that time frame I was pulled out of my cell many times by the Bureau of Prisons staff to receive service of lawsuits at all hours. + +5. Inasmuch as the Bureau of Prisons rules and regulations do not allow a prisoner to hand any documents to any visitors, including counsel, upon service of various lawsuits, I simply informed my attorney who would then look up the case with the appropriate court Ahamt d contact the attorney for the plaintiff(s) in such cases and/or take whatever appro aclFbn was necessary. + +0 6. To the best of my knowledge and belief, I do not re l being served with this lawsuit. If I was properly served with this lawsuit, it has numerous lawsuits and voluminous amount of other leg to date, I have not located the Complaint or Plaint!t loft for Default.2 isplaced within the pile of d has not been located. Even + +7. I state in good faith that if I 'knowledge of this lawsuit I would have advised my attorney as I have done viri. other lawsuits currently pending against me. + +8. As soon as I 1 lawsuit, I immediately contacted my attorney and advised him of same which pr d the filing of my Motion to Set Aside Default and this Affidavit in Support therm + +9. 1 v viable defense to the allegations contained in the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's ("P "Epstein"), Complaint. Without providing a detailed response to the Complairitherein, just one of many meritorious defenses to the Complaint is that at least one, if not more, of the lawsuits against Plaintiff which he references as the basis of this instant lawsuit (the "Civil Actions"), was filed with the court on behalf of certain clients by a defendant herein, a p, prior to his employment as an attorney at the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA"). The fact that M, prior to his employment with RRA, and prior + +2 Since learning of this lawsuit, my attorney obtained a copy of the Complaint. + +to our introductions with one another, already had client(s) suing Epstein in Civil Actions, goes against several counts in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, the RICO count. In fact, the Civil Actions filed by [REDACTED] and/or other attorneys at RRA were and are *real* cases, with *real* plaintiffs that have *real* claims against Epstein and, this instant lawsuit is Plaintiff's feeble attempt to take advantage of my unfortunate circumstances to disqualify claims by real persons that deserve to have their day in court. + +10. I respectfully submit that if the Court were to disallow my Motion to Set Aside Default, not only would I be extremely prejudiced inasmuch as I have viable defenses to the allegations contained in Plaintiff's Complaint, but the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions that [REDACTED] and others at RRA filed against Epstein which he references in his Complaint in this matter would be prejudiced as well. A default entered against me in this matter would have the same effect as my admission to the assertions made by Plaintiff which would, in essence, allow Epstein to prevail against the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions on the basis that they are frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits, which they are not. + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing affidavit and the facts stated in it are true. + +![]()STATE OF FLORIDA ) +St. Lucie County )ss.: +) + +BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally appeared SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who after being by me first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the Defendant in the above-styled cause; that he has read the foregoing Affidavit and the facts contained herein are true and correct. + +![]()SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 8th day of March, 2010, by SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who is personally known to me or who has produced St. Lucie County Jail I.Q as identification. + +![]()My commission expires: + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01355fb36a62dba75afd0de1c4074f4c11d476d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/EFTA02759586.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3240 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 58, + "chars": 89477, + "elapsed_seconds": 26.51, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg", + "_page_18_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_51_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_53_Picture_63.jpeg", + "_page_54_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.554, + 88.404 + ], + [ + 528.366, + 88.404 + ], + [ + 528.366, + 130.938 + ], + [ + 280.554, + 130.938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Motion to Compel \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.11600000000001, + 309.414 + ], + [ + 512.958, + 309.414 + ], + [ + 512.958, + 323.592 + ], + [ + 127.11600000000001, + 323.592 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.418, + 418.668 + ], + [ + 381.348, + 418.668 + ], + [ + 381.348, + 432.846 + ], + [ + 275.418, + 432.846 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IL \n( \n'Motion to Compel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.294, + 398.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 396.4053039550781, + 398.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 396.4053039550781, + 421.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.294, + 421.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(a) The Costs Incurred B RRA and The Financial Arran ement Between RRA \nand", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.264, + 653.022 + ], + [ + 535.4207153320312, + 653.022 + ], + [ + 535.4207153320312, + 681.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 123.264, + 681.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(b) Topic Specific Obiections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and \nShould be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to is ew \nFiled Affidavit", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.85600000000001, + 571.14 + ], + [ + 555.972, + 571.14 + ], + [ + 555.972, + 613.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 107.85600000000001, + 613.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. The Leeal Standard", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.8, + 130.938 + ], + [ + 400.9892272949219, + 130.938 + ], + [ + 400.9892272949219, + 146.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 256.8, + 146.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.504, + 132.606 + ], + [ + 378.8669738769531, + 132.606 + ], + [ + 378.8669738769531, + 147.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 264.504, + 147.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscoults.itov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.626, + 130.728 + ], + [ + 448.4012451171875, + 130.728 + ], + [ + 448.4012451171875, + 184.603515625 + ], + [ + 226.626, + 184.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO APPROVE AGREE \nBETWEEN THE CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE AND GARY \nF. STEVEN R. JAFFE, MATTEW D. WEISSINC, \nB J. MARK S. FISTOS AND SETH M. LEHRMAN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.994, + 284.082 + ], + [ + 509.3891906738281, + 284.082 + ], + [ + 509.3891906738281, + 337.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 164.994, + 337.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.95, + 476.822 + ], + [ + 368.7712707519531, + 476.822 + ], + [ + 368.7712707519531, + 490.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 304.95, + 490.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Relief Requested and Basis Therefor", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.95999999999998, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 427.6538391113281, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 427.6538391113281, + 593.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 243.95999999999998, + 593.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO.: \nSERVICE LIST \n09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.02200000000002, + 75.985 + ], + [ + 408.76910400390625, + 75.985 + ], + [ + 408.76910400390625, + 105.853515625 + ], + [ + 251.02200000000002, + 105.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO.: \nSERVICE LIST \n09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.02200000000002, + 77.841 + ], + [ + 409.1466979980469, + 77.841 + ], + [ + 409.1466979980469, + 107.853515625 + ], + [ + 251.02200000000002, + 107.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.802, + 82.02600000000001 + ], + [ + 405.102, + 82.02600000000001 + ], + [ + 405.102, + 94.581 + ], + [ + 308.802, + 94.581 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.802, + 77.841 + ], + [ + 406.88519287109375, + 77.841 + ], + [ + 406.88519287109375, + 93.47406005859375 + ], + [ + 308.802, + 93.47406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO.: \nSERVICE LIST \n09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.244, + 81.18900000000001 + ], + [ + 408.6634826660156, + 81.18900000000001 + ], + [ + 408.6634826660156, + 111.23358154296875 + ], + [ + 245.244, + 111.23358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 417.47979736328125, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 417.47979736328125, + 151.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 151.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECIT_AIS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.234, + 270.35100000000006 + ], + [ + 370.1142578125, + 270.35100000000006 + ], + [ + 370.1142578125, + 285.47406005859375 + ], + [ + 306.234, + 285.47406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.512, + 478.764 + ], + [ + 252.948, + 478.764 + ], + [ + 252.948, + 493.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 151.512, + 493.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.15999999999997, + 492.156 + ], + [ + 361.634033203125, + 492.156 + ], + [ + 361.634033203125, + 506.72406005859375 + ], + [ + 308.15999999999997, + 506.72406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 347.322, + 190.55810546875 + ], + [ + 402.8983459472656, + 190.55810546875 + ], + [ + 402.8983459472656, + 203.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 347.322, + 203.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "luta", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 346.038, + 436.914 + ], + [ + 387.768, + 436.914 + ], + [ + 387.768, + 450.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 346.038, + 450.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.592, + 508.05899999999997 + ], + [ + 359.3487243652344, + 508.05899999999997 + ], + [ + 359.3487243652344, + 522.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 305.592, + 522.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.56, + 605.988 + ], + [ + 147.018, + 605.988 + ], + [ + 147.018, + 617.706 + ], + [ + 115.56, + 617.706 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXEUNT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.922, + 105.462 + ], + [ + 461.6396789550781, + 105.462 + ], + [ + 461.6396789550781, + 121.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 218.922, + 121.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XXIIIBTT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.502, + 97.695 + ], + [ + 458.67547607421875, + 97.695 + ], + [ + 458.67547607421875, + 112.98114013671875 + ], + [ + 212.502, + 112.98114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.28000000000003, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 461.278564453125, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 461.278564453125, + 114.85113525390625 + ], + [ + 218.28000000000003, + 114.85113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.996, + 97.092 + ], + [ + 458.38800000000003, + 97.092 + ], + [ + 458.38800000000003, + 109.647 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 109.647 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.71200000000002, + 101.035 + ], + [ + 459.79547119140625, + 101.035 + ], + [ + 459.79547119140625, + 115.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 215.71200000000002, + 115.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.86, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 458.284912109375, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 458.284912109375, + 108.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 211.86, + 108.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 96.74400000000001 + ], + [ + 457.49090576171875, + 96.74400000000001 + ], + [ + 457.49090576171875, + 110.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 110.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXBIBff \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.996, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 460.5220642089844, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 460.5220642089844, + 116.447021484375 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 116.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXIDETT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 92.685 + ], + [ + 460.17547607421875, + 92.685 + ], + [ + 460.17547607421875, + 107.35113525390625 + ], + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 107.35113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "r/CRIBTT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 98.76599999999999 + ], + [ + 464.99761962890625, + 98.76599999999999 + ], + [ + 464.99761962890625, + 114.07623291015625 + ], + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 114.07623291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 97.092 + ], + [ + 461.26715087890625, + 97.092 + ], + [ + 461.26715087890625, + 112.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 112.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 91.01499999999999 + ], + [ + 458.2785339355469, + 91.01499999999999 + ], + [ + 458.2785339355469, + 105.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 105.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 459.18914794921875, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 459.18914794921875, + 107.21563720703125 + ], + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 107.21563720703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.502, + 89.345 + ], + [ + 457.93621826171875, + 89.345 + ], + [ + 457.93621826171875, + 104.35113525390625 + ], + [ + 212.502, + 104.35113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.428, + 91.233 + ], + [ + 458.2785339355469, + 91.233 + ], + [ + 458.2785339355469, + 105.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 214.428, + 105.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 459.3878173828125, + 93.52 + ], + [ + 459.3878173828125, + 107.35113525390625 + ], + [ + 216.35399999999998, + 107.35113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.996, + 91.01499999999999 + ], + [ + 460.11090087890625, + 91.01499999999999 + ], + [ + 460.11090087890625, + 105.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 105.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.428, + 92.07000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.104, + 92.07000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.104, + 106.29899999999999 + ], + [ + 214.428, + 106.29899999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.15599999999998, + 138.27 + ], + [ + 431.7336730957031, + 138.27 + ], + [ + 431.7336730957031, + 180.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 204.15599999999998, + 180.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL FISTEN C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.144, + 294.976 + ], + [ + 429.1724853515625, + 294.976 + ], + [ + 429.1724853515625, + 310.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 213.144, + 310.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.456, + 94.581 + ], + [ + 550.836, + 94.581 + ], + [ + 550.836, + 138.35302734375 + ], + [ + 300.456, + 138.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN \nIN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.34000000000003, + 343.17 + ], + [ + 468.65999999999997, + 343.17 + ], + [ + 468.65999999999997, + 373.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 173.34000000000003, + 373.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 97 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 197 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 149 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759586" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_18_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_18_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a228bd0326408f6a01d33c4cb294d3c4537642df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_18_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5643da8fbfdf19dada9f8dffc2722f316a89d608525958c254f856333ede8138 +size 9018 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_51_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_51_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c1e3600a295ec89880255af8718019f75bbf66d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_51_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1e3e7df24acdc64951347b07b572d792034d3ed88ea72a073e4f8a82b89ac660 +size 7943 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_53_Picture_63.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_53_Picture_63.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c9b8ddf400942a77d633d782b0a8faf2469e69b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_53_Picture_63.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d02e8d4cef4881ffd13dd7a7f80d708715b87f11451bf7ae08e0b3f0b5caf71d +size 12767 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_54_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_54_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a77fadd2dffed13e8b10ee972962e874565bd89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_54_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b426749d1a494bbbe860f80448c2edd97884c1bb837ce3d08a935dc17f52bd91 +size 8720 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6e69a3b6bfb9ec41bdda981a3e7c2a0ecfbca6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759586/_page_7_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50760c38a70419fb371a058d9ff017363d63b5b1dbd61bc29b3a4998d748a22a +size 8180 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d5ea1c1ab343e544afd9a2ce082ea7643cdeae0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +CLERK +CIRCUIT COURT +CIVIL S. FEL. +CLERK +CIRCUIT COURT +CIVIL S. FEL. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR +ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON [REDACTED] +COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS** + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR +JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY +JUDGMENT ON [REDACTED] COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS, and the Court +having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: The Motion is denied. + +See, Scozari v. Barone 546 Sub 750 (Fla 3rd DcA) + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this +day of May, 2010. + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +\* 1989); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ferre 636 +F. Supp 970 (SD Fla. 1985) + +Epstein v. Rothstein, at al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Jack Scarola Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffdcf454421c394ef24c930c24fc31adc40490ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644/EFTA02759644.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759644.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2127, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON [REDACTED] COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.98, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 512.915, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 512.915, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 84.98, + 380.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.72599999999997, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 253.72599999999997, + 165.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759644" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..635d9411d5bec823363e4f878b3b10d696a03c79 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.md @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Ctv. Pro.I201 + +v. + +R J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800X:XXXM33 pe.'G + +n: ▪ **0** ••••• = Cr. 0"• c • • -n F rn + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTED EXHIBI 44 71 ITED IN PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO APPEAR FOR FOLLOW-U t E TION + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, hereby giv iling Corrected Exhibit "D", cited in Plaintiff's Motion to Compel in support thereof: o Appear for Follow Up Deposition and + +- I. Plaintiff filed hi o Compel to Appear for a Follow-Up De sitign on May 10, 2010. +- 2. Exhibit "' .74, ched to the Motion to Compel is incorrect. +- 3. his Motion t hereby files his corrected Exhibit "D" to I filed on May 10, 2010. + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of May, 2010: + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. G M.=, Jr., Esq. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. + +Page 2 + +One East Broward Boulevard + +Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954-745-5849 + +954-745-3556 Fax + +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +686-6300 + +383-9424 F + +Attorneys for Defendant + ++o + +Lehrman, PL + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954-524-2820 + +954-524-2822 - Fax + +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian AvenueaSouth + +Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, 401-5012 + +Fax: -835-8691 + +Co-Cou Pendant Jeffrey Epstein + +BURMAN, ktlt \ N, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 40:k + +West Palnitleach, FL 33401 + +0 842-2820 + +)253-016 cry + +Critton, Jr. + +Florida ar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant JOIvy - Epstein) + +AFFIDAVIT OF [REDACTED] JAMES [REDACTED] + +1. I am an attorney in good standing with the Florida Bar and admitted to practice in the Southern District of Florida. I am a partner in the law firm of [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos and Lehrman. + +2. I am the lead attorney currently representing "Jane Doe" in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, case number 08-80893 in federal Court in the Southern District of Florida. I am the lead attorney representing Jane Doe, whose civil complaint alleges that Epstein sexually molested her numerous occasions when she was a minor. + +3. Defendant Epstein has entered into a "non-prosecution agreement" (NPA) with the federal government for sex crimes against minors. Under that agreement, the federal government has agreed not to file criminal charges against Epstein for sex crimes committed against approximately thirty girls, including Jane Doe. In exchange, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to state law criminal charges involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. The victim of the criminal charges to which he has pled was not Jane Doe. + +4. Under the NPA, Epstein has agreed not to contest civil liability of any of his approximately thirty victims – provided that the victim agrees to limit themselves to the damages provided by 18 U.S.C. § 2255 (currently set at \$150,000). Jane Doe has not agreed to limit herself to pursuing only \$150,000 in damages. Therefore, the terms of the NPA purport to prevent Jane Doe from using the NPA to prove liability. + +5. Epstein has filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, in which he has invoked his Fifth Amendment right to silence with respect to the allegations that he molested her as a child. Epstein has further argued that this Fifth Amendment invocation is the functional equivalent of, and must be treated as, a specific denial of the allegations. + +6. Defendant Epstein's deposition has been taken on several occasions, in this and other related cases, and he has not provided any substantive discovery whatsoever. Instead, he invoked his 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination when asked questions about his abuse of Jane Doe or other girls. + +7. Defendant Epstein has also been served with Interrogatories and requests for production; all requests have been met with 5th amendment assertions and Epstein has not given Jane Doe any substantive testimony related her allegations. + +8. Jane Doe's complaint contains a punitive damages claim, and Mr. Epstein has also elected to invoke the 5th Amendment on all questions that would relate to punitive damages issues, such as his intent when committing the crimes, his lack of remorse and his intent to recidivate. + +9. Epstein has taken Jane Doe's deposition. During that deposition he has asked numerous questions of Jane Doe that suggest that she is fabricating her allegation of abuse by Epstein. + +10. In addition to deposing Mr. Epstein, other attorneys and I have taken the depositions of his various co-conspirators (as labeled by the federal government in the NPA), including [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]. Each of those individuals was employed by Epstein to bring him underage girls for him to molest and to ensure that he was protected from detection by law enforcement, and thus those individuals could likely provide general testimony that would assist Plaintiff in proving liability and damages, including punitive damages. However, none of these individuals were + +![](_page_2_Picture_178.jpeg) + +present during acts of sexual abuse by Epstein. In any event, ALL of those individuals have also invoked their 5th amendment rights against self-incrimination, and thus have left Plaintiff with no information about what Epstein or other conspirators inside his house were doing during the sexual abuse of Jane Doe and other minors girls. This creates a serious issue for Jane Doe in proving her sexual molestation- ------- claim against Epstein. By its nature, sexual molestation takes place in private, with only the abuser and the victim typically available to testify. In this case, Epstein's abuse of Jane Doe took place i private, with only Epstein and Jane Doe present during the abuse. Jane Doe has no other reasonable Srenues of discovery to provide direct proof of claim of sexual abuse by Epstein. + +— •—• 11.- — Additionally, Mr. Epstein has recently filed-a lawsuit against-me-pe that has-nomerit whatsoever, a fact known to Mr. Epstein and his attorneys. He filed the laSysu against Brad M, Scott Rothstein, and L.M. (another Epstein victim of his molestation). That lawsuit implies that L.M.'s civil case against him (currently pending In Florida state court) is fabricated and that L.M. and I have conspired to commit fraud against him (presumably that she madik up the case against him, implying that he does not know L.M.). While the present subpoena the Court has been filed by Jane Doe, the Court should be aware that attorneys representing also file a subpoena for the Rush tape shortly. + +12. Despite Mri.in and all of his co-conspirators, as,srting a 5th amendment Privgeie against self-incrimination, Rush of the New Yor Daily news did contact me to inform me that Mr. Epstein spoke personally with him about issues tie various charges of sex abuse against him. + +13. Paraphrasing from memory of fiy vers5tion with Mr. Rush, Mr. Epstein told him that he may have come "too close to the line" but that he ould not have been punished as severely as he was and that his conduct was at most worthy of a \$1.00 fine. This is a statement that shows two things of great importance to Jane Doe's pending civil action. First, It Is in effect an admission by Epstein of his liability to Jane Doe for sexually abusing her. Jane Doe does not have any other admission of Epstein of his sexual abuse of her and Epstein has filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint that has the functional effect of denying abuse of her. Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways of obtaining an admission from Epstein of his molestation of Jane Doe without success. Second, the statement to Mr. Rush is a clear demonstration that Epstein lacks remorse for committing felony child molestation against Jane Doe. This will be a central Issue in the punitive damages case against Epstein at trial. Here again, Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways of obtaining a statement from Epstein about his lack of remorse for abusing Jane Doe without success. There are no other reasonable means of obtaining a statement from Epstein on these subjects. + +1.4. \_ Mr. Rush also told me that Mr. Epstein spoke specifically about one of my clients, L.M., and he made derogatory remarks about her. + +15. Additionally, Mr. Rush said that Epstein spoke directly about another civil case that was filed against him (Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein); that case alleges that Epstein repeatedly sexually abused a 15 year old girl, forced her to have sex with his friends and flew her on his private'plane national and internationally for the purposes of sexually molesting and abusing her. Epstein flippantly told Rush that that case was dismissed, in a way to indicate that the allegations are ridiculous and untrue. + +16. Mr. Rush indicated that he taped the conversation between him and Mr. Epstein. + +17. Mr. Rush also spoke at length to Michael Fisten, an investigator with my firm that was assisting with the investigation of the case. Mr. Fisten reported to me shortly after the conversation with Mr. Rush that he had such a conversation. + +18. While research by other plaintiffs' attorneys and myself has uncovered other persons that were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield, we have no information that any of those people (other than Mr. Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victims of Mr. - - Epstein's molestation. Mr. Dershowitz is acting as an attorney for Mr. Epstein, and therefore it is presumably unlikely to question him about any admissions that Epstein may have made regarding Jane Doe or other minors girls. Additionally, we have no information that any of those individuals or an other individuals have any taped statements of Epstein's own voice relating to these matters. \_\_ Rush's taped conversation with Mr. Epstein is the only known one in existence, making it very unique and it contains information not otherwise obtainable through other means or sources. Indeed, without the Rush tape conversation, the jury that handles the case will not hear any words from Epstein himself about his abuse of Jane Doe and other young girls. I have been informed, by Epstein's attorney that Epstein intends to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights rather than answer any substantive questions about the abuse of Jane Doe and other girls at trial. + +19. The Rush interview is, in any event, unique and not otherwise obtainable from other witnesses because it can be used to prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein. Epstein lied about not knowing Rush. See deposition of Jeffrey Epstein; taken in L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, case S0.2008-CA-028051, pag .a line 4 through 155 line 9,,wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly Impresses that he does not recognize l=1 Rush from the New York Daily News, despite the fact that he gave a personal Interview that we all now know to have been tape recorded. It is therefore evidence of a criminal event. If we receive the tape, we intend to alert the appropriate law enforcement authorities, both federal and state, so that they can pursue any appropriate criminal investigation perjury charges. + +20. The tape is also crucial for L.M, to dismiss the frivolous complaint filed by Jeffrey Epstein against her, as he clearly acknowledges knowing L.M., contrary to claims he makes in his complaint against her and also contradictory to other statements he has made in depositions related to knowing L.M. In that regard, this tape provides evidence of other false statements Epstein has made under oath. + +21. During a telephone call with Rush, he provided me more than a description of the tape, and in fact described the general tenor of the entire interview, so that nothing in the interview can be fairly regarded as conQdential at this point. + +22. AS" Rush admitted in his affidavit, he played the tape for at least two other persons who alsoconfirmed Epstein's arrogance as he speaks about his actions with minors. + +23. The people for whom Rush played the tape or told in detail of the information on the tape were net "sources" in the tradition sense of the word — all individuals were simply chatting with Mr. Rush about Mr. Epstein and his propensity to molest children. For example, when I discussed the tape with Mr. Rush, I was not a "source" in the traditional sense of that term. At no point did Mr. Rush tell me that I was a "source" for his reporting. + +24. Because Epstein and all other co-conspirators have Invoked the 5th amendment as to all relevant questions, this tape is the only way that Jane Doe can put Epstein's own perceptions of what he has done before the jury and the only way that Jane Doe can put Epstein's admissions and statement s before the jury. As even a quick perusal of the more than S00 entries on the docket sheet for Jane Doe's (consolidated) case will confirm (see Case no. 9:08-80119 (S.D. Fla.) (case number for consolidated cases on discovery), Jane Doe and other plaintiffs have made exhaustive attempts to obtain information from Epstein about his abuse. These attempts have included repeated requests for admission, requests for production, interrogatories, and depositions — all the means that are listed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for obtaining discovery. These means have all been exhausted without success. Neither + +Jane Doe nor any of the other plaintiffs have been able to obtain even a single word of information from Epstein about his abuse of minor girls. + +25. I made a good faith, albeit unsuccessful, effort to resolve this matter with Anne B. Carroll, representing the Daily News in order to avoid any court intervention. I explained that we needed this tape for several reasons, including those cited by her in her pleading. The tape is detrimental to Epstein's personal complaint against L.M. and me; the tape is evidence of perjury committed by Epstein; the tape is the Best Evidence of his lack of remorse for his actions and will be presented in the punitive damages phase of the civil trials against him; and, perhaps most important, the tape is the only way that the jury considering Jane Doe's case will be able to hear Epstein's voice and own statements about his abuse of Jane Doe and other minor girls. Without the tape, the jury will not have the opportunity to hear Epstein give any substantive information about Jane Doe's complaint. Indeed, they will not have the opportunity to even hear Epstein's voice utter any substantive words other than (in essence) "I take the Fifth." Ms. Carroll has made it clear that Rush's disclosures were viewed unfavorably by his employer. + +I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. + +FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. + +Dated this 23rd day of April, 2010. + +![]()The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23rd day of April, 2010 by BRAD [REDACTED] who is personally known to me. + +![](_page_5_Picture_120.jpeg) + +![]()My Commission Expires: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f926adcf8216bc05248719ae4f189e2a6e482de --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/EFTA02759646.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 15520, + "elapsed_seconds": 12.72, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_2_Picture_178.jpeg", + "_page_5_Picture_120.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.473, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 516.0867919921875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 516.0867919921875, + 116.238037109375 + ], + [ + 266.473, + 116.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTED EXHIBI 44 71 ITED IN \nPLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL \nTO APPEAR FOR FOLLOW-U t E TION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.112, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 482.8998718261719, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 482.8998718261719, + 334.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 131.112, + 334.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.86999999999998, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 362.70050048828125, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 362.70050048828125, + 595.4780120849609 + ], + [ + 248.86999999999998, + 595.4780120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF [REDACTED] JAMES [REDACTED]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 413.97400000000005, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 413.97400000000005, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 142.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759646" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_2_Picture_178.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_2_Picture_178.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9f0503b9b1f9acb744475e2077c8f28a8e6d209 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_2_Picture_178.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b290595f4145769d7b3c29fd9b2c8ae55bf6259ac2b8cbadc74f64c6c0bd3724 +size 6967 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_5_Picture_120.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_5_Picture_120.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1414251d115c2f9a514f6ae69fb9b53c2ffa81dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759646/_page_5_Picture_120.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f952444efdae8e9d1db12bbda783f315ea85d0218a84e9bdd56a0a0858e6439e +size 11770 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ad9adfbc128e9721b1c78eb04fad1d34054a870 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +'m, + +0 C '" 74E: F 2c fTi A — + +) + +To: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One oward Boulevard Suite 700, Fort Lauder 1 , FL 33301, GARY M. , JR., ESQ., Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lau erdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P,A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012. + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion will be called up for hearing on May 20, 2010, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +## EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO APPEAR FOR FOLLOW-UP DEPOSITION + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to Local Rule No. 4, a good faith attempt to resolve the matters set for hearing has been attempted but an agreement has not been reached between parties as of the date of this notice. + +Courtesy Copy of Notice and Plaintiff's Motio ISe + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressee, this 11th day of May, 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2820 + +(561) 253-0164 F x + +By: + +Robert D. Mon, Jr. + +Florida Bar #224162 + +Michael J. Pike + +Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +( S' 7 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c71f7afca5c22c3e8010086b670ab0fe9102d009 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652/EFTA02759652.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759652.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1853, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.045, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 481.6763916015625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 481.6763916015625, + 128.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 264.045, + 128.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.765, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 369.1972351074219, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 369.1972351074219, + 333.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 239.765, + 333.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO \nAPPEAR FOR FOLLOW-UP DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.793, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 504.9088439941406, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 504.9088439941406, + 552.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 120.793, + 552.1800079345703 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759652" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4857f6070b67ca6a01fe3b0f089f0fe1d864c7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXX\*MBAG + +O Zci -yr c ••••••• a • rn .0 TT, IV + +## DEFENDANT na). FRS NSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIO DATED APRIL 12, 2010 + +Defendant, J. EDWARDS, hereby files his Response to Request for + +Production propounded by Pie April 12, 2010 as follows: + +- 1. None. +- 2. a. zObjeOtion, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. None. ction as to communications to or from investigators as that is otected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. +- 4. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. +- 5. None. +- 6. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any investor. + +- 7. None. +- 8. None. +- 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. +- 10. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. None. None. None. None. None. None. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, ambiguous. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and protected by the work-product privilege. +- 20. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege. +- 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege. +- 22. Not yet determined. + +502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +- 23. Objection. +- 24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege. +- 25. None in Defendant's possession. +- 26. None. + +27. None in Defendant's possession. + +502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 4rki A-IJD furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on HAY April- , 2010. + +> Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart .iy, St P.A. Attorneys for Defendant, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) + +By: 1 (CLC Jack r No.: /6 rf-4-o + +cw + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 +Attorneys for L.M. + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c621a2cbc46d2614f34b51a3f3e6b99a8c1f13f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654/EFTA02759654.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759654.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 3660, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 134.42999267578125 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 134.42999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT na). FRS NSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST \nFOR PRODUCTIO DATED APRIL 12, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.875, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 522.02, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 522.02, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 75.875, + 409.04999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.73399999999998, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 381.0013122558594, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 381.0013122558594, + 147.54498291015625 + ], + [ + 219.73399999999998, + 147.54498291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 363.59299999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 363.59299999999996, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759654" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6274e89010661c9d39a9103306fcf3e7991bb2af --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +SHANNON R. SOCH, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +2010 MAY 12 PM 3:21 + +SEARCHED + +NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT [REDACTED] ANSWERS TO +PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES + +Defendant, [REDACTED] Edwards hereby files his Notice of Service of Defendant's +Answers to Plaintiff's First Interrogatories propounded on April 5, 2010. + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been +furnished via FAX AND U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on May 11, 2010. + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +By: + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Defendant's Answers to Interrogatories + +COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 +Attorneys for L.M. + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c4e06856406dfcd49bd0674a7c1486c9cfa918b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659/EFTA02759659.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759659.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2002, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 133.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT [REDACTED] ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.83199999999998, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 488.028, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 488.028, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 106.83199999999998, + 407.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 375.126, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 375.126, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 490.04999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 364.2, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 364.2, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759659" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e094025c96f3419fef0b440055ac0f7a8f6938a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +FILED +JOHN 14 PH 3:13 +CIRCUIT CLERK +CIRCUIT COURT FL +CLERK +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**DEFENDANT, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] NOTICE OF FILING** +**ORIGINAL JURAT TO ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES** + +Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Filing Original Jurat to Defendant's Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories dated May 11, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of May, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +MI Notice of Filing Original Jurat to Ans. To Int. + +Page 2 of 2 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire rcrit@bciclaw.com; czaguirre@bc1claw.com; jeadwell@bciclaw.com Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +, Jaffe, Weissing, Edw Fi os & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc25813523d8cebba46a592dca91bfc7cd014c66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661/EFTA02759661.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759661.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2100, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL JURAT TO ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.05399999999999, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 524.448, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 524.448, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 74.05399999999999, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.72599999999997, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 148.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 253.72599999999997, + 148.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759661" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f994d8b9974da310055df7c1a6c2c44041a74771 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SHARON COCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL/PRC +FILED +2010 MAY 20 PM 4:02 + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING + +To: GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 325 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following motion scheduled for a hearing on May 20, 2010, at 8:45 A.M. before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED] at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Hwy., Room 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, is hereby cancelled: + +EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL [REDACTED] TO +APPEAR FOR FOLLOW-UP DEPOSITION + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. Mail to the above addressees, this 19th day of May, 2010. + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: [Signature] +Robert D. Critton, Jr. +Florida Bar #224162 +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +NON-COPY + +Courtesy Copy of Notice to Judge [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8aa252d940f9c46ee232cc964d6abb8624f209d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663/EFTA02759663.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759663.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1667, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.045, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 478.923, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 478.923, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 264.045, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.279, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 426.114, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 426.114, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 180.279, + 318.33 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759663" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f286bd0440ffb82fb18c7b75d728d9bd84704db5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.md @@ -0,0 +1,475 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.201 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +: - • : : ..2 \_.. z- s .) + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, .\_O J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\ + +ACC + +# BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S MOTS\* FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +Pursuant to Rule 1.410, HerbertiStettin, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A., files this Motkoh for Protective Order and states: + +- 1. On November 1C99, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") was put into involuntary bankruptcy. TI)Ittpase is pending as In Re Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A., On November 2 09, Herbert Stettin was appointed Trustee of RRA. On November 30, 2009, an Order f r was entered by this Court. On April 16, 2010, Plaintiff caused a subpoena duces tecum to be served on the Trustee for production of documents. A copy of the subpoena duces tecum is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 3 . The Trustee's responsibility under the involuntary bankruptcy filing is to winddown the business affairs of RRA. In that regard, the Trustee has three (3) people in his employ + +and has various professionals whose employment have been approved by the United States Bankruptcy County. + +4 . Additionally, Scott Rothstein, who apparently managed the affairs of the law firm, has been criminally charged by the United States of America with various violations of federal law to which he has pled guilty. Associated with those charges, the United States, of America 1, seized the law firm's bank accounts. See Exhibit B annexed hereto. + +5 . Consequently, the very limited financial resources are primarily devoted to trying to bring money into the estate as opposed to expending money on unfelated third party litigation, such as this one. + +6. While the Trustee has indicated in a different lawsuit his willingness to try to produce to Mr. Epstein the documents he needs"in order that the Trustee's responsibility for • winding-up the affairs of the Estate is not impeded and because of the limited finances available to the Trustee, he requests that the Co/tin order that all costs associated with responding to Mr. fir— y Epstein's subpoena duces return be\I?o,e \by Mr. Epstein and that at least 50% of the estimated fe, costs be paid to the Trustee,,prior to any responsibility for undertaking a search for the documents. + +7. Thee Trustee also requests that the time for responding to the subpoena duces tecum be adjourned until such time as this Court or Mr. Epstein and the Trustee are able to ' resolvet i\\ssues raised in this Motion for Protective Order. + +Wherefore, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee requests this Court to grant this motion. + +Respectfully submitted, + +BERGER SINGERMAN Counsel for the Trustee 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Tenth Floor Miami, Florida 33131 305.755.9500 305.714 + +C. r ingluun Jr. F a. Bar 197 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct Mail and facsimile on Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr Fl; Mr. Marc Nurik, One East Broward BlvQite Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes B1 Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort L Ave. South, Suite 1400, West P S foregoing was served by U.S. • an an Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach 00, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; Mr. Jack alm Beach, FL; Mr. Gary 425 N. L 33301 and Mr. Jack Goldberger, 250 Australian each, FL 33401-5012 this day of M 010. + +lcSr 7 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FCR DEPOSITION – DOCUMENTS ONLY** + +**THE STATE OF FLORIDA** + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA +C/O James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Prose Court Reporting, 101 NE 3rd Avenue, +Suite #1500, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, on May 19, 2010, 4:00 p.m., bring with you the +following: + +**See attached Exhibit A** + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless +excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as +directed. + +DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. + +![]()![]()ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +(Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 + +![](_page_3_Picture_163.jpeg) + +## EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. 'Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such cop herwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, note ges, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, mai , lectronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice ra ffice telephone calls, ig) diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, r arts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade inform t' j ci rding fabric, carpets, samples etc..., computer printouts, prospectuse ASN, I statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, trans t t/, ,s istics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all' dra s, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregojng), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordiv, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or repres tion of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and record' s , d including the file and file cover. m7% ) + +The term "Document" also means any and all computer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written statement dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case 11502008CA028051)OOCXMB), E.N. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058)0aXMB), Jane Doe' (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marraa), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. + +"Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +1 If you are unable to identify each Plaintiff, please contact Robert D. Critton, Jr. at their names will be provided pursuant to a confidentiality agreement. + +G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +**DUCES TECUM2** + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +- a. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +- b. Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; +- c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +- d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +- e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +- f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +- a. Any Plaintiff and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] or any entity with which he has been associated; +- b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and [REDACTED] Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +--- + +2 Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special [REDACTED] and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. Scott W. Rothstein; +- b. J. +- c. RRA; +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey E + +6. All fee sharing agreements between J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to, any aspect of any Plaintiffs case. + +7. Scuments made available to any investor` or potential investor by J. RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing payment of any bill or cost in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' cases were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents related to the amount of Costs that were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. and is claiming or has claimed + +18. All documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +19. All documents which purport to mention any transfer of funders or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +20. All documents relating to any investment, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or a Rothstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +21. All emails exchanged between any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: + +- a. Scott Rothstein +- b. Adler +- c. William Berger +- d. Michael Fisten +- e. Kenneth Jenne +- f. David Boden +- g. Deborah +- h. Andrew Barnett Rocberts +- j. Richard (Rick) Fandry +- k. Christina Kitterman +- I. Brad + +22. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +- 23. All Q-Task "Projects" that refer to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 24. All Q-Task Projects that refer to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +25. All documents that identify all individuals who were granted access (invited guests) or who had access to the Q-Task Projects referred to in request nos. 23 and 24. + +- 26. All documents, communications and letters sent by you assessing liens against the recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARFtA/JOHNSON + +27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as bankruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases against Epstein. This includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is claiming. + +28. Any employment agreements A IdtttaBS describing compensation and benefits for during his e ent with RRA. + +29. All documents from the ' software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +), 30. All documents fronytne"Fortress" software program that refer or relate to L.M ,E.W ,or Jane Doe. + +31. For the time period April 1, 2009 through November 5, 2009, all emails to and from any employee, partner, shareholder, attorney, agent or client of RRA that reference any of the following: + +- (- a. A.J. DiScala; + - b. I, D3 Capital Club, LLC -c-: Bill Clinton; Alan Dershowitz; + - e. David Copperfield; + - f. Kevin Spacey; + - g. Chris Tucker; + - h. Prince Andrew + - i. Jean-Luc Brunel; + - j. Tomm Motolla; + - k. Bill + - I. Donald Trump. + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 09-61780-CIV-2LOCH/ROSENBAUM + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +VARIOUS REAL PROPERTIES PURCHASED BY OR WITH OR ON BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, SPECIFICALLY: + +- (I) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2307 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (2) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2308 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (3) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2316 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (4) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTEN LOCATED AT 30 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (5) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 29 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (6) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 350 SE 2N° STREET, UNIT 2840, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (7) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 380 CARRINGTON DRIVE, WESTON, FLORIDA; +- (8) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2133 IMPERIAL POINT DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +AND INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTIES ("RP"), VEHICLES & VESSELS ("VV"), TANGIBLES ("T'), BANK ACCOUNTS ("BA"), BUSINESS + +![](_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg) + +INTERESTS ("Br) AND CONTRIBUTIONS ("C"), SPECIFICALLY: + +(RP9) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2627 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP I 0) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 10630 NW 14TM STREET, APT. 110, PLANTATION, FLORIDA; + +(RP I 1) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 227 GARDEN COURT, LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, FLORIDA; + +(RPI2) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 708 SPANGLER BOULEVARD, BAY 1, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA; + +LOCATED AT 1012 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; \ (RPI3) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, C) + +(RPI4) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCfN,S, LOCATED AT 950 N FEDERAL HIGHWAY, 4 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; '8, + +(RP15) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTE LOCATED AT 350 LAS OLAS BOULEVARD, COMMERCIAL UNIT 2, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP16) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 361 SE 9' LANE, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(FtP17) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 1198 N. OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(RPI 8) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 1299 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(RP19) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 151 EAST 58 STREET, APARTMENT 42D, NEW YORK, NEW YORK; + +(R220) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 11 BLUFF COVE FARM, + +NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND; + +(RP2 I) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 15 BLUFF COVE FARM, NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND; + +(VV I ) 1990 RED FERRARI F40 COUPE, VIN: ZFFMN34A5L0087066; + +(VV2) 2009 CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCBDR33W29C059672; + +(VV4) 2007 BLACK LIMOUSINE M EXPEDITION, VIN: I F 1 FK15557LA59223; (VV3) 2008 YELLOW MCLAREN MERCEDES BENZ SLR, + +VIN: WDDAK76F98M001788; C OS VIN: SCA1L68557UX23044; AS C2 ) ?S" + +(VV 5) 2009 RED FERRARI 430 SPIDER, VIN: ZFFEW59A380163011; + +(VV6) 2007 SILVER ROLLS ROYCE CONVERTIBLE, + +(VV7) 2006 SILVER HUMMER HI, VIN: 137PH84396E220665; + +(VV8) 2008 CADILLAC ESCALADE, VIN: 1GYEC63858Ft234458; + +(VV9) 1967 RED CONVERTIBLE C ( IPE4....) VIN: 194677SI 04745; + +(VV 10) 2009 BLACK BUGATTLVEYRON EB 16.4, VIN: VF9SA25C28M795153.7" 7 + +(VV1 I )2008 BI.UE ROLLS ROYCE DROPHEAD CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCA2D68528iJ X 16071; + +(VV12) 2006 RED FERRARI F430 SPIDER, VIN: ZFFEWS9A560148863; + +(VV13) 2008 CHEVROLET CORVETTE, VIN: IGIYY26W485120085; + +(VV14) 2009 CHEVROLET CORVETTE Z06, VIN: 1G I YZ26E995111923; + +(VV I5) 2009 BLUE GRAY MASERATI GRANTURISMO COUPE, VIN: ZAMGJ45A090042326; + +(VV I6) 2009 MERCEDES BENZ, VIN: WDBSK7 I F 159F49477; + +(VV17) 2007 87' HULL ti WAR87777B707; + +(VV18) 33' AQUARIvA, HULL N XFA33R74G405; + +(VV19) 2009 11' YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL N YAMA36611809; + +(VV20) 2009 I I' YAMAHA VS, HULL N YAMA36261809; + +(VV21) 2009 I l' YAMAHA VS, HULL NYAMA2679G809; + +(VV22) 1999 55' SEA RAY 540 SUNDANCER, HULL H SERY001899; + +(VV23) 2009 YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL N YAMA4288K809. + +(VV 24)2010 LAMBORGHINI LP-670sv, VIN: ZHWBU8AHXALA03837; + +(VV25) MERCEDES BENZ S65 V R BYTU VIN: WDDEJ79XX8A0 I 5189, FLORIDA TAG ItHV490; ( 14/ + +(VV26) 2009 RED BMW CONVERTIBLE, VIN: WBALM53529EI60836; + +(VV27) 2009 MERCEDES BENZ SLK 350 CONVERTIBLE, V1N: WDBWK58F19F190779; + +(T1) 304 PIECES OF JEWELRY; (T2) 16 DU PONT LIGHTERS; (T3) 3 PIECES SPORTS MEMORABILIA; (T4) \$271,160 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; (T5) 51,500 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; (T6) S30,000 IN AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CARDS; + +s A Co (T7) \$50,000 IN AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CARDS; + +(T8) 5 ADDITIONAL WATCHES; + +(T9) GUITAR COLLECTION; + +(BA I) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT, IN THE NAME OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY \$1,263,780; + +(BA2) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF WAWW 3 LLC, IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$117,032.76; + +(BA3) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$53,448.51; + +(BA4) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$71,793.06; + +(BA5) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$995,521.426; + +(BA6) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, BAN] ACCOUNT I 78780211819923220000187, IN THE NAME OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$12,000,00(7 + +(BA7) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF AHNICK KHALID, UP TO THE AMOUNT OF \$2,000,000; + +(BA8) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF STEVE CAPUTI, UP TO THE AMOUNT OF \$1,000,000; + +(B11) STOCK CERTIFICATES OR BENEFICIAL INTEREST R4 50,000 SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK IN GIBRALTAR PRIVATE BANK & TRUST; + +(B12) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN QTASK; + +(BD) Scorr W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN BROWARD BANK OF COMMERCE; + +(B14) Scum' W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN BOVA RISTORANTE; + +(BI5) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN + +co\A + +BOVA CUCINA; + +(816) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN BOVA PRIME; + +(617) San W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN CAFE IGUANA, PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA; + +(818) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN CART SHIELD USA, LLC; + +(819) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN RENATO WATCHES; + +(8110) Scan W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN Coin' LLC; + +(B I 1 1) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN V GEORGIO VODKA; + +(8112) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN SEA CLUB; + +(8113) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN A \ v NORTH STAR MORTGAGE; + +(6114) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY IN ? IN S'' Kw HUNTER MARKETING; + +A .."...1 (BI15) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEKLST IN RRA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; + +(8116) Scan W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN VERSACE MANSION/CASA CASUATUNA, INCLUDING I 0 YEAR OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH 2 TEN YEAR OPTIONS; + +(8117) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST, AND LICENSING RIGHTS, IN ALTERNATIVE BIOFUEL COMPANY; + +(BII 8) -Scart\_W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN RRA GOAL. LINE MANAGEMENT; + +(6119) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN IRON STREET MANAGEMENT, LLC; + +(B120) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND LOAN TO, AFRICA? EQUITY JO DECIDE; + +(8121) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND RENTS DERIVED FROM DUCKY'S BBQ, LOCATED cos + +AT 1198 N. OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(B122) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEM'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND RENTS DERIVED FROM THE CAR WASH LOCATED AT 1299 FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA + +(8123) PROMISSORY Non BY UNIGLOBE IN FAVOR OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN; + +(8124) ALL EQUITY INTEREST HELD BY OR ON BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, IN VARIOUS CORPORATIONS AND ENTITIES; + +(C1) \$6,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO ALEX SINK ;AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES ON BEHALF OF ALEX SINK; + +(C2) \$40,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, "FLORIDA" ACCOUNT AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE. UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF F + +(C3) \$10,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, "FEDERAL" AC AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED Q THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN.PA LORIDA; + +(C4) S90,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRTB REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C5) \$5,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OP FLORIDA BY ROTHSTEIN BUSINESS ENTITY ICNOWN AS WAWW AND VOLUNTARIIY,OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY-THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C6) \$800,000 CHARITABLE DONATION TO JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL ADVISED THE UNITED STATES OF THE DONATION FROM THE ROTHSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION; + +(Cl) \$1,000,000 CHARITABLE DONATION TO HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL ADVISED THE UNITED STATES OF THE DONATION FROM THE ROTHSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION; + +(C8) \$9,600 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO GOVERNOR CHARLIE CRIST AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE OFFICE OF CHARLIE CR1ST; + +AND + +(C9) ALL FUNDS VOLUNTARILY TURNED OVER TO THE UNITED STATES (IRS/FBI) SINCE IN OR ABOUT OCTOBER 28, 2009 IN RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY INVOLVING SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +## WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM FOR NON-REAL PROPERTIES + +TO: THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, THE UNITEDSTATES MARSHALS OR ANY OTHER AUTHORIZED FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER + +WHEREAS, on November 27, 2009, the United States of America filed an Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem against the above-named defendants, also referred to as "defendant properties," for the violations of law enumerated in said Complaint [DE #19]; and + +WHEREAS, the Court has found that probable cause exists that the defendants are subject to forfeiture: + +NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby commanded to take the defendants into your possession for safe tody, If the character or situation of the property is such that the taking of actual possesstmis impracticable, you shall execute this process by affixing a copy thereof to the property in a conspicuous place and/or by leaving a copy of the Amended Verified Complaint and process with the person having possession or his agent. + +YOU ARE FURTHER commanded to cite and admonish the owner and/or possessor of the defendants, and any person or firm known to claim any interest therein, to file in the United States District Court, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128-7788, within thirty (35) days + +following receipt of this Warrant, a Verified Claim in accordance with Rule G(5), Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, and to therewith or within twenty (20) days thereafter file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Verified Complaint, a copy of which Complaint you shall supply with this Warrant, and to serve copies of said Claim and Answer upon the United States Attorney, 99 NE 4th Street, Miami, Florida 33132, Attention: **Alison W. Lehr**, Assistant United States Attorney, and that upon failure of the owner, possessor or any party claiming an interest in the defendant properties to do so, that the defendant properties may then be forfeited to the United States by default and without further notice or hearing. + +**AND YOU ARE FURTHER** commanded to make due and prompt return of this Warrant to this Court upon its execution. + +WITNESS THE HONORABLE + +![]()WILLIAM J. ZLOCH +UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE + +DATE: 12/17/09 + +STEVEN LARIMORE, CLERK +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7fa1cd95925dc3f7c2e13749621070057decb55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/EFTA02759665.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,983 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 27610, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.07, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_163.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.897, + 77.33 + ], + [ + 525.389404296875, + 77.33 + ], + [ + 525.389404296875, + 121.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 285.897, + 121.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S MOTS* FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.4, + 380.13800000000003 + ], + [ + 491.9879150390625, + 380.13800000000003 + ], + [ + 491.9879150390625, + 395.863037109375 + ], + [ + 121.4, + 395.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.58999999999997, + 309.802 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 309.802 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 324.60302734375 + ], + [ + 224.58999999999997, + 324.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.32, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 509.124, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 509.124, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 292.32, + 110.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FCR DEPOSITION \u2013 DOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.84499999999998, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 124.84499999999998, + 289.98 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE STATE OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.253, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 206.45100000000002, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 206.45100000000002, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 71.253, + 315.09000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.396, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 335.287841796875, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 335.287841796875, + 85.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 270.396, + 85.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 99.5574951171875 + ], + [ + 404.90252685546875, + 99.5574951171875 + ], + [ + 404.90252685546875, + 114.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 114.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.393, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.393, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.49599999999998, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 384.9520568847656, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 384.9520568847656, + 109.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 209.49599999999998, + 109.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM FOR NON-REAL PROPERTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.672, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 473.44793701171875, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 473.44793701171875, + 286.35858154296875 + ], + [ + 126.672, + 286.35858154296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759665" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..195c30eb9e5f95d8319b681f64cb4a25fccf57e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e3043980cb19c0c6640b95f487a5c7db45b9ae626168b4e9fe69e03ae7e2ad14 +size 8014 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_3_Picture_163.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_3_Picture_163.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af3ba78da51e0dbd79b9d8f462c7f0ff767661df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759665/_page_3_Picture_163.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7372df65e8cf953391e12dda6ea314d3b5588a2f9ed02359071b7cacfa32e357 +size 7452 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7d14be53cd6dbbe1e0d99830b1cb90e1c087b9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +agreement, it is hereby: THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Request to Produce, and the Cou r dvised that the parties are in + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. + +Plaintiff, + +THSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AGT.r."; 'go + +--- n 3 c slo -cr r i pr.: 41 -,o o ..-5; • 1:42 crt Ka, + +## AGREED ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +4 A\ ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Motion is hereby GRANTED. To the extent Epstein claims attorneys' fees and costs as part of his damages for the claims set forth in his Complaint, Epstein's attorneys (without waiving any objections, privileges or the ability to provide a privilege log, and in redacted form) shall produce documents responsive to Request No. 1 to Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP on or before May 17, 2010. Epstein shall serve his response, inclu , gytclocuments, to Request No. 1 and reserves the right to assert any applicable object' s/privileges on or before May 26, 2010. To preserve attorney/client privileges, wI fritddot privileges, Fifth Amendment and any other applicable privileges, Epstein iii uce said responsive documents in redacted form. + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courth se, West Palm Beach, Florida, SP thi\*,2/-iday of 2010 + +> Davits F`CFbw Circuit Judge + +Copied furnished to: ROBERT D CRITTON, JR.. ESQ.. Burman. Critton. Luther & Coleman. 303 Banyan Boulevard. Suite 400, West Palm Beach. FL 33401, MARC S NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc S. Nunk One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. . JR.. ESQ..," Jaffe. Weissing.... Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2. Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301. JACK S A LA, ESQ.. Searcy nney carola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ.. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400. West Palm Beach. FL 33401.5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f083b4f45634d3c9d85e42a75899553b030b9b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684/EFTA02759684.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759684.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2203, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.806, + 69.72 + ], + [ + 494.31939697265625, + 69.72 + ], + [ + 494.31939697265625, + 109.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 278.806, + 109.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.32400000000001, + 275.52 + ], + [ + 510.7852478027344, + 275.52 + ], + [ + 510.7852478027344, + 303.68701171875 + ], + [ + 126.32400000000001, + 303.68701171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759684" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d69506b933f4e92d1954b3b201f797448aeecec6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.md @@ -0,0 +1,499 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. ROCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CANAL / APRIL 25/2010 +FILED +2010 MAY 25 PM 4: 37 + +**EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO POSTPONE THE JUNE 4, 2010 +HEARING ON ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), moves to postpone the June 4, 2010 hearing on Defendant's, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("Rothstein"), Motion to Set Aside Default, and states: + +1. 1. Epstein filed the instant action against Rothstein and others on December 9, 2009. +2. 2. On December 31, 2009, Epstein filed a Motion for Default due to Rothstein's failure to respond to the Complaint. +3. 3. A default was entered by the Clerk on January 21, 2010. +4. 4. Rothstein filed a Motion to Set Aside Default on February 17, 2010. +5. 5. Several weeks later and on the eve of the hearing on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, Rothstein filed an affidavit on March 8, 2010 in support of his Motion to Set Aside Default. +6. 6. The next day, March 9, 2010, a hearing was held on Rothstein's Motion to + +Set Aside Default and the Court deferred ruling so the parties could conduct discovery related to the motion (3/9/10 Order attached as Exhibit A). + +7. On April 5, 2010, counsel for Epstein wrote to counsel for Rothstein to coordinate Rothstein's deposition and indicated that since Rothstein is in jail, the location of his deposition would likely have to be moved. See 4/5/10 Letter attached as Exhibit B. Counsel for Rothstein never responded to said letter. + +8. On April 15, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Strike Affidavit of Scott Rothstein because he was unable to depose Rothstein. + +9. On April 22, 2010, the Court denied Epstein's Motion to Strike Affidavit of Scott Rothstein and granted an additional thirty (30) days to depose Rothstein (4/22/10 Order attached as Exhibit C). + +10. However, Rothstein's own counsel has had considerable difficulty locating and communicating with his client. In an April 22, 2010 article in the South Florida Business Journal (attached as Exhibit D), it was reported that Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., was unaware of his client's location for substantial periods of time and has only had limited contact with Rothstein. Mr. Nurik was quoted as follows: + +- a. "[Rothstein] is presently in protective housing outside of this district.... Undersigned counsel's contacts with his client must be arranged and approved in advance through the government, which creates delay." +- b. "There have been numerous occasions in the past few months when undersigned counsel has been unaware of his client's location and has been repeatedly out of contact with his client for substantial periods of time, including one period for over two weeks." +- c. "Given these limitations in the past five weeks, counsel has only been able to meet with his client on two occasions. Currently, there is no ability to e-mail [Rothstein], and phone contact is very limited. Even the sending and receipt of legal mail takes longer than the norm." + +See Exhibit C (emphasis added). + +11. Interestingly, counsel for Rothstein had no problem obtaining Rothstein's notarized signature on his affidavit. + +12. Due to the additional time given to depose Rothstein, the hearing on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default was rescheduled to June 4, 2010. + +13. However, Epstein has been unable to locate, let alone depose, Rothstein and therefore requests the Court postpone the June 4, 2010 heari e Motion to Set Aside Default. + +14. Epstein's counsel has made the numerousAw 5 rts locate and depose Rothstein, to no avail: + +- a. Telephone conference with 'Lisa -Kaye, Case Management Coordinator/Legal Liaison at the Federal Detention Center in Miami — was advised they do not have custody of Rothstein, have no information on his whereabouts and could not assist in coordinating his deposition; +- b. Telephone conference with U.S. Marshal's office was advised they are not responsible for coordinating depositions and would not give provide any information regarding Rothstein. +- c. Telephone conference Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator in Washington D.C. — was advised they have no record of Scott Rothstein; +- d. Telephone conference with Port St. Lucie Jail was advised they had custody of Rothstein for brief period, but had no information on his whereabouts; +- e. Two voicemails for Bureau of Prisons never returned a call; +- f. Two letters and two voicemails for United States Attorney Paul never returned a call or responded to letters; and +- g. Voicemail for United States Attorney Jeff Kaplan never returned call. + +15. In addition, news articles have suggested that Rothstein is entering the federal witness protection program due to his involvement in assisting the government arrest reputed Gambino mob figure Robert Settineri: + +- h. "But [Rothstein] may end up spending less time behind bars; the feds plan to put him in prison under the witness protection program for helping sting Settineri in the FBI undercover operation." See 3/19/10 Miami Herald Article attached as Exhibit E. +- i. "Sources tell CBS4 News that because of his cooperation in this case [against Settineri], Rothstein will be entering the federal witness protection program — meaning he will serve his prison time for the Ponzi scheme under a different name and in a prison outside of Florida. See 3/15/10 CBS4 Article attached as Exhibit F. + +16. Given the above-described difficulties in locating and ing Rothstein, Epstein requests the Court postpone the June 4, 2010 hearing on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default and provide an additional thirty (30) days to take Rothstein's deposition. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests the Court postpone the June 4, 2010 hearing on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default and provide an additional thirty (30) days to depose Rothstein and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. \*ci Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 25th day of May, 2010: + +S A. Farmer, Jr., Esq. , Jaffe, Weissing, & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. Fistos + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik & Counsel to Scott Rothstein + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556F + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** + +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 258-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()*for* +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +7 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Scott Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/ +denied deferred pending a special not +leave to be parties are given love to +and a discovery in regard the Motion + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 23 day of Mar., 2010 + +David F. [REDACTED] +Circuit Judge + +![](_page_5_Picture_33.jpeg) + +Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +*CC: JE, DS* + +![](_page_6_Picture_0.jpeg) + +BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER &COLEMAN us, YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES + +A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP + +f. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA." GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT a CRITTON. JR.. RA I BERNARD A. LESEDEKER MARK T. LUTTIER. RA MICHAEL ). PIKE DAVID A. YAREMA + +1RORIDA BOARD CERTIFIED CJVIL TRIAL LAWYER 'ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO + +### Sent by Fax, E-Mall and U.S. Mall + +Mark Nurik, Esq. Rothstein, Rosenfedit, Adler, P.A. 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +April 5, 2010 + +Re: Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CA04080 AG + +Dear Mr. Nurik: + +ADELOVI I. BENAVENTE PMLALEGAL/INASTICATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARINO BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RIFA H. BUONYK OF NHL EDVEMOM. RICCI + +O C + +As you are aware, we have set your client's Motion to Set Aside Default on a special set for 40 minutes on April 30, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. The court indicated we both could take discovery. + +I am enclosing a Notice for the Deposition of Scott Rothstein at a court reporter's office at West Palm Beach. I have set it for April 15, 2010. I am aware that Mr. Rothstein is in jail, and therefore probably cannot attend that deposition at that location. Therefore, I am willing to move the location. The deposition will deal solely with issues associated with his Motion to Set Aside the Default. + +If that deposition time does not work, please let me know. If it is your intent to file a motion for protective order regarding Mr. Rothstein, please so file. + +Additionally, I would like an additional date such that I can take Mr. Rothstein's deposition in the case. Specifically, I would like to ve t ose issues that are directed to Mr. I have received a Notice from Mr. attorney which requires me to do the necessary work and investigation suc that I can make certain recommendations to my client. I am aware that Mr. Rothstein prior to his plea, was completely off limits to a deposition. With his guilty plea, I would anticipate that he now + +EXHIBIT I75 LCLAW.COM + +Epstein v. Rothstein Page 2 + +is available to give a deposition. Would you please contact me such that the above discovery can be arranged. + +Cordially Yours, + +RDC/clz + +D. Critton, Jr. cosA th day of April, 2010 + +David F. Crow +Circuit Judge + +Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +![](_page_8_Picture_31.jpeg) + +lAnnoes:. lea 10I Not Reastered? RwIMwlot rawest?. INMCM. + +South Florida &aeons Jeanie .Apr11 22,2010 + +ntio ftinnehnOdOstlersumascor laniSldrin UP lblUatriaJ201044rrothsteln senenclna awed to WO MIS + +## sari JOURNAL + +Blog: Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces + +### Rothstein Sentencing Moved To June 9 + +Thursday, April 22. 2010, 1 25pm EDT I Mildred. Thursday. April 72. 2010, 1 40pn1 + +A judge has moved Ponzl schemer Scott Rothstein's sentencing back more than a month. + +That is not necessarily so unusual, but the reasons seem pretty weird. + +There's a motion from Rothstein's attorney, Marc Nurik, that's unlike anything I've seen in a court case + +![](_page_9_Picture_14.jpeg) + +Nurik claims that Rothstein's cooperation with federal authorities by providing evil interfered with Munk's ability to communicate with him. ce for dlRpeb mafla stings has + +According to federal authorities and numerous media reports, Rothstein hel Protection & Investigation, a local security firm that had lies to the mar connection in South Florida. All three were hit with federal indictmen money and destroy evidence of his Ponzi scheme. uplWEempktyees of Five Star Executive do Settineri, an alleged Sicilian mafia ein allegedly asked them to launder + +This comes after the first sealed document was filed in Roth are recommending a lighter sentence because of coopera litchi is a signal that might mean the reds + +Nunk has almadv admItteff to creating a smokescreen think that Rothstein was flaunting federal jurlsdicU arrested. on so that the public and Certain alleged criminals would + +Here's the relevant text of Nurik's request for a later sentencing d + +"Specifically, the defendant is presently in protective housin counsel's contacts with his client must be arranged and a district and treated differently than other inmates. Undersigned nce through the government, which creates delay. + +"There have been numerous occasions in the past few repeatedly out of contact with his client for subs undersigned COunSel has been unaware of his client's location and has been time, including one period for over two weeks. + +"Given these limitations, in the past five weeks, ability to email the defendant, and phone con only been able to meet with his client on two occasions. Currently, there is no limited. Even the sending and receipt of legal mail takes longer than the norm.' + +Paul Brinkmann Reporter AuLic + +![](_page_9_Picture_9.jpeg) + +Rothstein was to be sentenced May 6. Tl tir date is June 9, at 9:30 a.m. + +Gurnee; Lesejescles + +People fast MOOS + +AN contents of this site n City Business Journals Inc. All rights reserved. + +![](_page_9_Picture_28.jpeg) + +# the is iami Herald + +Posted on Fri, Mar. 19, 2010 + +# Scott Rothstein figure accused of making threat + +By JAY WEAVER jweaver@MiamiHerald.com + +Roberto Settineri, the reputed Sicilian mafioso snagged by Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein in an FBI sting, had a little brush with the law in January. + +As he was eating al fresco at Soprano Cafe on Lincoln Road, Settineri opened his leather jacket to flash a handgun at a private security officer, a police report states. + +"I will put this gun in your f---g mouth," Settineri told the security officer, the report says. "I know where you live. I'll go to your house and kill you and your family." + +Miami Beach police eventually caught up with Settineri, who denied threatening the guard with his firearm. The cops arrested Settineri, 41, of Miami, on an aggravated assault charge, a third-degree felony. + +But that's the least of his problems. + +Last week, FBI agents arrested Italian-born Settineri, a naturalized U.S. citizen who works as a wine wholesaler, on obstruction of justice and money laundering charges in connection with Rothstein's \$1.2 billion investment scam. Federal authorities also accuse him of being connected to the mafia's Colombo and Gambino crime families. + +At the same time, Italian National Police officers flew to Miami and revealed charges accusing Settineri of belonging to the Sicilian mafia and participating in a slew of violent crimes. + +Settineri was a regular on Lincoln Road, where he sold wine to restaurants lining the popular pedestrian way. EXHIBIT + +![](_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg) + +Michael , Settineri's lawyer, said his client was eating with CI lAJUIJIG of other men at Soprano Cafe on Jan. 8 when he had the run-in with the + +security officer, Cesar Mainardi, who was on his patrol bike. He worked for Security Alliance, a company contracted with the city of Miami Beach. + +said Mainardi confronted Settineri over a woman they both knew. + +Main ved his way through a tight crowd and intentionally harassed him," said. Settineri "told the security guard to leave him alone, and he made up these allegations." + +But Mainardi, in an interview with The Miami Herald, denied the fight was over a woman. + +In his police statement, Mainardi accused Settineri of threatening him for no reason: "Apparently he did not like the way I looked at him, and I noticed his reaction and wanted to talk to him, but he acted aggressive." + +### 'HEATED ARGUMENT' + +Mainardi told police that Settineri flashed the semi-automatic weapon, which was in a holster on his belt. But "he never took it out," Mainardi said. + +Settineri left the restaurant after the confrontation, but Miami Beach police reached him on his cellphone. + +According to the police report, Settineri admitted having a "heated argument" with the security officer but denied "threatening him with any type of gun." + +Settineri said he owned four guns, but they were all at his Brickell Key condo in Miami at the time of the incident. Police found no weapon on him. + +State records show that Settineri has a concealed-weapons permit. + +### ROTHSTEIN LINK + +Rothstein, who came to know Settineri through a Broward security company he had hired for protection, allegedly talked Settineri into shredding documents and laundering \$79,000 in November from the Fort Lauderdale lawyer's Ponzi scheme, according to an indictment unsealed last week. + +Rothstein, 47, who pleaded guilty to racketeering and other charges in January, faces up to 100 years in prison at his sentencing in May. But he may end up spending less time behind bars; the feds plan to put him in prison under the witness protection program for helping sting Settineri in the FBI undercover operation. + +Italian authorities charged Settineri along with 19 other people allegedly linked to the Sicilian mafia. The charges: extortion, drug trafficking and attempted murder. + +© 2010 Miami Herald Media Company. All Rights Reserved. + +http://www.miamiherald.com <49 6)\* + +the CBS4 1.Teamit Most Popular Investigations + +![](_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg) + +Illi Babysmer Describes Boy's Swode + +- Tn. Dangers Of Seining +- The Stripper. Toe Priest, and The Baby +- Air Travers Chny Ude Secret +- Giving Away American Jobs, Pan i + +Print Share • Comments (2) + +Mar 15. 20106 44 pm uSiEastem + +### I-Team: Rothstein Scams Alleged Mafia Player Rothstein Hired Security Firm For SISK/Day + +& Cate Telles( fir Lame umodemds + +![](_page_13_Picture_10.jpeg) + +Reporting J th DeFede MIAMI (C BSA I-TEAM) — In South Floras. where hucksters and cheats are an everyday fact of We Scott Rothstein may be remembered as the greatest con man of them all. A lawyer who from obscurity to build one of the most polstiCally powerful law firms in the state. Rothstein now stands convicted of biking friends and strangers alike The 51.2 billion Pony scheme he orchestrated is the largest in South Florida history He lied, tricked and deceived nearly everyone he met. And the damage he caused may never be repaired. + +E-mail But Rothstein's tagged con may actually be the one he has done on behalf of the federal government. The CBS4 I-Team learned from multiple sources that Rothstein was the key figure in bringing down a suspected Wm figure who the FBI ha trying to catch for years. + +La st week. U S. Attorney Jeffrey Sidman announced the arrests ol three individuals, including Roberto Settinen. who the prw slaof described as the go between for the Gambino ChMe organization in Brooklyn and Ls Cosa Nostra in Palermo. Slaty + +![](_page_13_Picture_12.jpeg) + +'These arrests were part of a dint US and Italian law enforcement action; Semen said during thednamtays press conferente + +Al the same bore Seeman was arrested by an FBI SWAT Team at his home on Miami Beech. Gambino time limey were arrested in Brooklyn and twenty members of the Sicilian Mal were taken into custody in Palermo. of the le Mans de Gesu. + +Taken into custody in South Florida along with Setoneri was Dant Dromerhau Pines was charged but was out of the country when the raids took place. Enrique Ros of Pembroke + +Solemn. Denterhauser and Res were charged with one count of consent:10 Justice and two counts of obstructors and attempting to obstruct federal proceedings, one count of conspiracy to launder money and rue counts of substantive money laundering If convicted of el nine counts the men could each ta sentenced to 160 years in pnscn + +Although Rothslein's name never appears in the end' net was it mentioned during Wednesdays press conference at the U.S. Attorneys Office CBS4 News has learned that the man t the center oe the case is none other than Scott Rothstein + +Wten Rothstein returned from Morocco on N 3. he tr. immediately began cooperating with prosecutors + +Hunkered down in • hotel meat teams of ficia questioned Rothstein for days about everyone he haS ever done business with. One name, however, quickly stood out — Roberto Settled + +SC0tt Rothstein CBS + +Related Sideshows + +am, Few' 2010 NCAA Tournament Seledion CBS4 in The Community + +M CA + +Championship Day 4 + +Related Stores + +I-Team Rothsten aced Security Fern For 518K/Day + +(3m7/2010) + +Prosecutors describe Dement/m.5er IM as 'associates' of Settinen. They operated a private security firm called Five Star Executive Protection a Investigation. According to the attorney for Dromethauser. Frye Star did extensive work for Rothstein. providing security for Rothstein's borne and ha businesses. They were test heed by Roenten several mars ago to provide security for Casa Casawina — the former Versate Mansion — after Rothstein bought the property. + +John Gibes, the spiels' agent in charge of the FBI's Miami Field Office, said Settinen is someone the rods have been interested in for years + +'This operation code named Paean Blues began in 2006 when Italian National Police provided the FBI with information about Setbrieri," Gilles sad + +But in as those years. the FBI had been unable to bu Id any sort of criminal case against Setonen. That is. until Rothstein came along. + +Based on sources familiar with the investigation. as well as details contained in the indictment., on November 8, five days after returnee from Morocco. Rothstein was directed by federal agents to contact Sottisen and the others He pretended he need the men to help him destroy incriminatng financial records before federal agents could find them. + +He also &tragedy asked them to help move some of his Ponsi scheme money to off shore bank accounts + +Rothstein, however, was front page news and reports were already surfacing he was cooperating with the FBI. + +So in order le make the undercover operation work. Rothstein had to puteedy I cooperative with the FBI + +![](_page_13_Picture_30.jpeg) + +On November 9th. in • move carefully orchestrated by federal agents, Rothstein showed up at the Capital Gripe for • martini This video was even posted by Broward New Times. + +Conbnuing the charade. Rothstein that same day granted an interview with Channel 7. Once again, he StraSSed he was not Cooperating w4h faders) euthOntleS. + +After years conning others to make Minted rich. Rothstein was now using those skills on behalf of the federal government Md the feds say he was successful + +'As alleged in the indictment Settinen, Dromerhauser and Ros were pad of a conspiracy to launder 10 million it illicit funds; Gilboa said during Wednesday's press conference + +In January. as federal agents in Miami continued to build • cafe against Settineri, a high level meeting took place in Italy + +Agents and prosecutors from Miami and Brooklyn. as well as Justice Department officials from Washington. flew across the Atlantic to meet with their itaian counterparts + +Italian prosecutors were working on a massive indictment spinet twenty suspected members of the Patermo-based crime organisation. Sant Wile de Gesu. Md in New York. prosecutors were building a separate case against three alleged members of the Gambino crime family. + +The Miami case involving Setbnen had finally given them the link they had been wading for. + +The group agreed they would coordinate they cases and make the arrests simultaneously. + +Raffaele Grassi. a Moe director in the Italian National Police, thrived in South Florida last week with a handful of a the Settinen operation + +O + +'The important intermediacy in the US was Roberto Sehnert a man from Palermo who has been living in Miami kit • long lime: Grassi said. 'He has important ties to the American Mafia famtatra of Gambino and Colombo. Through Roberto Settinen, La Cosa Nostra was eying to open new connections in the US and his connections would enable the Italian organization to Infiltrate new markets." + +'Today is a very important day in the tight against the criminal organisation of La Cosa Nosey?' Oday'a results are me fruit of a very complicated investigation caned out by the Italian State Prthce together with the FBI both in Italy and + +Just how complicated was the investigation? Not wanting to reveal Rothstein's rcea Attorney Sloman only offered this cryptic response when asked what brought the Italians and the Americans together + +"alb had mutual interests that overlapped with one another," he said. Y I wAahr about that' + +In advance of these arrests. Rothstein was moved out of to for his own protection. + +Sources tell CBS4 News that because of his cooperation p stein wit be entering the federal witness protection program — meaning he will serve his peon time for the POOL scheme under a ddferent name end in a Outside of Florida. + +Ulbmiltely. Rothstein is hoping he cooperation in the Behind cese will shave years from his prison sentence. He is facing up to 100 years in raison alter pleading chatty to live counts ofmoney laundering and wire fraud Similar Pont cases around the United States. however, have yielded sentences of around 40 years in proton. Rothstein is scheduled to be sentenced in May. + +In addition to the Schoen case. Rothstein is also helping federal authorities identify the other players in the Pont scheme. Md he is providing information on how campaign finance laws were routinely violated. + +### KNOW mour nos mar) MORE k tick To Sane + +(0 MMX. CBS Broadcasting Inc Rights Reserved wing \_ Has Never Been Easier! + +Going To Protect Your Home £coZone. Store Sells Eco-Frienly Paid Keys Women Go Naked For A Good Cause Organics Class How To Grown. Florcla Marion Pitch-In To Go MI bdcl Comment + +To poll comMentil. you must log in by clicking here. Need a lop in? Register here + +Your Name Your E.MaIl • Will not be displayed with COMMenl Suggest Link ink • e.g (brig /mew myweterle COM) + +Your Comment + +Post Comment + +1024 characters remaining for comment + +CFQB + +Type the characters in this picture:\* + +Click here to refresh with new letters + +Show Comments (2) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b944832eb4b3dd859ee28d8a0a57b9abf0dc8a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/EFTA02759685.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1012 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 28123, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.72, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Picture_33.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_0.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_31.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_28.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.792, + 83.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 548.6800000000001, + 83.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 548.6800000000001, + 126.312 + ], + [ + 308.792, + 126.312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO POSTPONE THE JUNE 4, 2010 HEARING ON ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.342, + 330.73800000000006 + ], + [ + 496.3640000000001, + 330.73800000000006 + ], + [ + 496.3640000000001, + 359.823 + ], + [ + 133.342, + 359.823 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 483.14 + ], + [ + 376.42, + 483.14 + ], + [ + 376.42, + 497.301 + ], + [ + 252.01000000000002, + 497.301 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.91, + 99.96 + ], + [ + 500.83000000000004, + 99.96 + ], + [ + 500.83000000000004, + 154.105 + ], + [ + 283.91, + 154.105 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.13000000000001, + 333.2 + ], + [ + 561.44, + 333.2 + ], + [ + 561.44, + 345.695 + ], + [ + 86.13000000000001, + 345.695 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sent by Fax, E-Mall and U.S. Mall", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.664, + 278.385 + ], + [ + 276.43731689453125, + 278.385 + ], + [ + 276.43731689453125, + 294.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 81.664, + 294.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.91, + 88.917 + ], + [ + 500.192, + 88.917 + ], + [ + 500.192, + 145.42499999999998 + ], + [ + 283.91, + 145.42499999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.962, + 322.428 + ], + [ + 518.694, + 322.428 + ], + [ + 518.694, + 335.724 + ], + [ + 126.962, + 335.724 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "sari\nJOURNAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.922, + 93.08203125 + ], + [ + 211.29486083984375, + 93.08203125 + ], + [ + 211.29486083984375, + 136.8975830078125 + ], + [ + 75.922, + 136.8975830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Sentencing Moved \nTo June 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.37, + 183.872 + ], + [ + 251.77919006347656, + 183.872 + ], + [ + 251.77919006347656, + 215.1529541015625 + ], + [ + 73.37, + 215.1529541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "the is iami Herald", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.75, + 82.26934814453125 + ], + [ + 299.86, + 82.26934814453125 + ], + [ + 299.86, + 118.6602783203125 + ], + [ + 79.75, + 118.6602783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scott Rothstein figure accused of making threat", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.198, + 145.57421875 + ], + [ + 564.5797119140625, + 145.57421875 + ], + [ + 564.5797119140625, + 171.66241455078125 + ], + [ + 77.198, + 171.66241455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.198, + 686.406 + ], + [ + 215.644, + 686.406 + ], + [ + 215.644, + 701.3639999999999 + ], + [ + 77.198, + 701.3639999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'HEATED ARGUMENT'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.284, + 305.808 + ], + [ + 231.61024475097656, + 305.808 + ], + [ + 231.61024475097656, + 323.51593017578125 + ], + [ + 75.284, + 323.51593017578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ROTHSTEIN LINK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.284, + 545.967 + ], + [ + 198.20460510253906, + 545.967 + ], + [ + 198.20460510253906, + 564.6459197998047 + ], + [ + 75.284, + 564.6459197998047 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I-Team: Rothstein Scams Alleged Mafia Player \nRothstein Hired Security Firm For SISK/Day", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.714, + 151.24200000000002 + ], + [ + 359.587890625, + 151.24200000000002 + ], + [ + 359.587890625, + 179.72406005859375 + ], + [ + 65.714, + 179.72406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "KNOW mour nos mar) \nMORE k tick To Sane", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.076, + 562.1703033447266 + ], + [ + 212.454, + 562.1703033447266 + ], + [ + 212.454, + 585.3170318603516 + ], + [ + 65.076, + 585.3170318603516 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 18 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 75 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Span", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759685" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e43ad3144ba4dc41ff00cd1d1e85fda41250cb4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae3acf38bee64bea72f6cc03e5a2c0ab40fcb49cb0832449cc3dded35f88301c +size 23351 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3260d96d70ba2bd5c8bcb4e17b6b01daec1ba0d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:465d28515ace290fd0ba4c04d69146fa76e28b2a4acc267351884fea3e514c54 +size 2288 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6298abf1e70d5ab473832f5d5ac78432529045e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1665b57a0096d2c62605b3298db6d60fadf3f9f16f2355d577ad973e94452d42 +size 9561 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..074a081aab44737c332639421896c9384362d2f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:31d991a7dbe05b8676a91ad8cd5d3c84264366e2cffdb636d60034701abdfe2a +size 1965 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d9e0b29570c624dd8c3e7876511915e6a6db195 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_13_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:413c5e3d156799edad37a9e93bdfd3890beab9ff97a641c01370307da5893950 +size 7206 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_5_Picture_33.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_5_Picture_33.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..688a25e4da38c1a76103b60d277831fa6394defe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_5_Picture_33.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:781485bd30f240a2beb8f569fef422587f1b03357adaa84cc257b30bad1266c7 +size 7909 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_6_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_6_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a48871a74a90ce80a3ce936ecf67092dc0ad6960 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_6_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3100f24588be926da40a57bfe0c235ed3a88dc7abf2aa84ede166ccd52201d55 +size 3231 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_8_Picture_31.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_8_Picture_31.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcbf7280af16a6713a0365f5efa70fcbdf1dffdb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_8_Picture_31.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74b6010ad6203de8382921218019027afa70681cc08f6244349ce729bb1200df +size 7900 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..568fd64db12bf91b2e71bc90f7fbc43f5d7ea283 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9dd46612756705d36deb69d449cc5a590ddb6f5c89c05493ef360600a13da69b +size 8203 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_28.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_28.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bd8c8b2570804f8845d874ebdf44385ba8e451f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_28.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e793a7f1a709e6e6daf4cb98280bd891a3872ea44147ca365c03fd89b66be90a +size 8532 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0ff21105d0c96ac339f880cf46930f9906b7c63 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759685/_page_9_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0422f982420acc788f2b9c86d7064ee045215509a22abface32f974480adaca0 +size 2843 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759701/EFTA02759701.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759701/EFTA02759701.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..442a7f2e6caecd21b581f0dc1cb0929aa6f58a56 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759701/EFTA02759701.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. + +Plaintiff, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +C 0 th Street +Miami, FL 33132 + +IMPORTANT + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint/petition with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the Court to hear your side of this case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the Court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book). + +SHARON R. BOCK +Clerk & Comptroller +P.O. Box 4667 +West Palm Beach, Florida +33402-4867 + +vs. Case No: + +If you &Dose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the Court you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to :tie "PlaintiffP!aintiffs Attorney's named below. + +ROBERT C. CRITTON, JR. 3URVIAN, CRITTON, LUTT!ER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 Wes: Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 + +-THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TC EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: "C E COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint/petition in this action the above-named Defendant. + +Ael\ + +DK-ED ON December 8, 20 + +(SEAL) + +(See Reverse Side) (Vease al :eves) (Voir de L:autre cote de) SHARON R. BOCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT + +BY: EpNA DEPUTY CLERK + +vs. +Case No: + +### IMPORTANTE + +Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tine 20 Dias, contados a partir del recibo de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. Una llamada atelefonica no lo protegera. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen ostros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia telefonica. + +Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta ante el tribunal usted anviar por correo o entegar una copia de su respuesta a la persona deominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). + +### IMPORTANT + +Des poursuites judiciares ont ete enterprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consecutifs a partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour deposer une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce tribunal. Un simple coupe de telephone est insuffisant pour vous proteger. Vous etes oblige de deposer votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende voutre cause. Si vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relativequis, vouc risquez de perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent etre saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez telephoner a un service de reerence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a l'annuaire de telephones). + +Si vous choisissez de deposer vous-meme une reponse ecrite, il vous faudra egalement, en meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" (Plaignant ou a son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) + +MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ) + +BEFORE ME, the undersign 9 tfority personally appeared having personal knowledge and being d , deposes and says: + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, S + +### AFFIDAVIT OF CARLOS AGUIRtO + +- 1. I, Carlos Aguirre, a ce by the State of Florida to serve legal process, C.P.S. #810. +- 2. I was hired the di firm of Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman to serve process in this matte riTtirthe Defendant, Scott Rothstein. +- 3. O ece ber 8, 2009, I contacted the Federal Bureau of Prisons via facsimile r to serve process on Scott Rothstein. December 9, 2009, I arrived at the Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida and personally served Scott Rothstein with the Complaint and Amended Summons at approximately 8:45 a.m. + - 5. Mr. Rothstein was in a hallway, out of his cell, with other prisoners. A + +EXHIBITZ\_ + +guard called Mr. Rothstein's name and he came forward. I personally placed the Complaint and Amended Summons in Mr. Rothstein's hands and advised him that he was being served with a lawsuit. Mr. Rothstein then turned and walked away with the papers I served him. + +FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. + +Carlos Aguirre + +STATE OF FLORIDA + +M:AMI-DADE COUNTY + +I hereby Certify that on this day, \ < Q an officer duly authorized to acminister oaths and take acknowled personally appeared Carlos Aguirre kr own to me to be the person des ed and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before m th t /she executed the same. that I relied upon the /--.<"or 79 foilowing form(s) of identifi the above named person: eti aw ], and that art oath was/war net tr oc + +Cos + +WITNE my h rid and official seal in the Count and State last aforesaid this + +A S / / Claw of C , 2010. + +PIR,N N (SEAL) + +NOTA Y PUBLIC/STATE OF FLORIDA + +COMMISSION NO • + +2 + +![](_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg) + +IN THE C.. ..L'UIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXMMB Division: AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff(s), + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually and L.M. individually Defendant(s), + +### DEFAUL + +A default is entered in the above styled cause COTT ROTHSTEIN, individually for failure to serve a pleading at the time req • + +DONE AND ORDERED at the Clerk34O1fice, City of West Palm Beach, this 21 day of JANUARY, 2010. + +> Sharon R. Bock Clerk & Comptroller + +By: KIMBERLY Deputy Clerk + +Copies furnished to: + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTEER & COLEMAN LLP 303 BANYAN BLVD., STE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401.4349 + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY C/0 FDC, MIAMI FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER, 33 NE 4Th STREEL\_MIAMI, FL 33132 + +GARY , ESQ , 425 N. ANDREWS AVENUE, SUITE 2, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 JOHN SCAROLA , ESQ , 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 PADULA & GRANT, PLLC 365 E. PALMETTO PARK ROAD, BOCA RATON, FL 33432-5015 + +nXITz:3!1- + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. + +J3FFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, J. ME, and LM, + +Defendants. + +### AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT W. ltO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SE' DEFAULT + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss.: S\ COUNTY OF ) + +Before me, the undersigneka ity, personally appeared, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, \ } who after being by me first d Ly'sw i) on oath, deposes and states as follows: + +- 1. I am a Defend ' the above-captioned matter. +- 2. 1 di not r spond to the Summons and Complaint in this lawsuit because I did not have know! O to existence until February, 2010. In February 2010, I learned that this lawsuit to respori +- 3. From December 1, 2009 until March 1, 2010, I was detained at the Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida. gainst me and that a default judgment had been entered against me for failure + +Go + +I On March I, 2010, I was transferred to the Port St. Lucie jail. + +4. During that time frame I was pulled out of my cell many times by the Bureau of Prisons staff to receive service of lawsuits at all hours. + +5. Inasmuch as the Bureau of Prisons rules and regulations do not allow a prisoner to hand any documents to any visitors, including counsel, upon service of various lawsuits, I simply informed my attorney who would then look up the case with the appropriate court and contact the attorney for the plaintiff(s) in such cases and/or take whatever appropriate ction was necessary. + +S ThN'i 6. To the best of my knowledge and belief, I do not I served with this lawsuit. If I was properly served with this lawsuit, it has n aced within the pile of numerous lawsuits and voluminous amount of other leg d has not been located. Even to date, I have not located the Complaint or Plainti lti14/ cti " for Default.2 + +7. I state in good faith that if I knowledge of this lawsuit I would have advised my attorney as I have done with\_r riougpther lawsuits currently pending against me. + +8. As soon as I le /1/4 A lawsuit, I immediately contacted my attorney and , - N advised him of same which pcK npt i the filing of my Motion to Set Aside Default and this Affidavit in Support thei7sr + +9. ve a able defense to the allegations contained in the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's (" r "Epstein"), Complaint. Without providing a detailed response to the Compl ein, just one of many meritorious defenses to the Complaint is that at least one, if not more, of the lawsuits against Plaintiff which he references as the basis of this instant lawsuit (the "Civil Actions"), was filed with the court on behalf of certain clients by a defendant herein, a "), prior to his employment as an attorney at the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA"). The fact that prior to his employment with RRA, and prior + +2Since learning of this lawsuit, my attorney obtained a copy of the Complaint. + +to our introductions with one another, already had client(s) suing Epstein in Civil Actions, goes against several counts in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, the RICO count. In fact, the Civil Actions filed by [REDACTED] and/or other attorneys at RRA were and are *real* cases, with *real* plaintiffs that have *real* claims against Epstein and, this instant lawsuit is Plaintiff's feeble attempt to take advantage of my unfortunate circumstances to disqualify claims by real persons that deserve to have their day in court. + +10. I respectfully submit that if the Court were to disallow my Motion to Set Aside Default, not only would I be extremely prejudiced inasmuch as I have viable defenses to the allegations contained in Plaintiff's Complaint, but the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions that [REDACTED] and others at RRA filed against Epstein which he references in his Complaint in this matter would be prejudiced as well. A default entered against me in this matter would have the same effect as my admission to the assertions made by Plaintiff which would, in essence, allow Epstein to prevail against the plaintiffs in the Civil Actions on the basis that they are frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits, which they are not. + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing affidavit and the facts stated in it are true. + +![]()STATE OF FLORIDA ) +St. Lucia County )ss.: +) + +BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally appeared SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who after being by me first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the Defendant in the above-styled cause; that he has read the foregoing Affidavit and the facts contained herein are true and correct. + +![]()SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 8th day of March, 2010, by SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, who is personally known to me or who has produced St. Lucia County Jail IQ as identification. + +![]()My commission expires: + +![]()IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Scott Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, and the Court [REDACTED] ing heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/ +denied - defended pending a special act +court to be parties are given coure to +produce discovery in regard the Motion + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 3rd day of Mar., 2010 + +*[Signature]* + +David F. [REDACTED] +Circuit Judge + +EXHIBIT E + +Copied furnished to: + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CHEFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. [REDACTED], +Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Motion to Strike Affidavit of Scott Rothstein, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Motion is hereby granted/denied +However, the Motion for Removal of Defendant will +be postmod for 30 days to allev the +Plaintiff to obtain discovery as to the Affidavit. + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, +Florida, this 20th day of April, 2010 + +![]()EXHIBIT F + +Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Members: [Log in](#) | Not Registered? [Register](#) for free extra services. + +![](_page_23_Figure_40.jpeg) + +![](_page_23_Picture_41.jpeg) + +**South Florida BUSINESS JOURNAL** + +Choose Another City: South Florida + +Site | News | Videos | Jobs + Keywords + +HOME NEWS SMALL BUSINESS SALES & MKTG REAL ESTATE EVENTS DIRECTORY CAREERS TRAVEL MORE TOPICS + U.S. business news Meet Your Biz Goals Classifieds Email Alerts Book of Lists Subscribe - 4 Free Issues + +South Florida > Blog > Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces > 2010 > Arch > Rothstein sentencing moved to June 9 + +**Blog: Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces** + +**Rothstein Sentencing Moved To June 9** + +![](_page_23_Picture_49.jpeg) + +Thursday, April 22, 2010, 1:25pm EDT | Modified: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 1:40pm + Print Email RSS Feed Share Comments + +A judge has moved Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein's sentencing back more than a month. That is not necessarily so unusual, but the reasons seem pretty weird. There's a motion from Rothstein's attorney, Marc Nurik, that's unlike anything I've seen in a court case recently. + +![](_page_23_Picture_52.jpeg) + +Nurik claims that Rothstein's cooperation with federal authorities by providing evidence for alleged mafia stings has interfered with Nurik's ability to communicate with him. According to federal authorities and numerous media reports, Rothstein helped set up two employees of Five Star Executive Protection & Investigation, a local security firm that had ties to the mafia, and Roberto Settineri, an alleged Sicilian mafia connection in South Florida. All three were hit with federal indictments after Rothstein allegedly asked them to launder money and destroy evidence of his Ponzi scheme. + +This comes after the first sealed document was filed in Rothstein's criminal case, which is a signal that might mean the feds are recommending a lighter sentence because of cooperation. + +Nurik has already admitted to creating a smokescreen of misdirection so that the public and certain alleged criminals would think that Rothstein was flaunting federal jurisdiction before he was arrested. + +Here's the relevant text of Nurik's request for a later sentencing date: "Specifically, the defendant is presently in protective housing outside of this district and treated differently than other inmates. Undersigned counsel's contacts with his client must be arranged and approved in advance through the government, which creates delay. + +"There have been numerous occasions in the past few months when undersigned counsel has been unaware of his client's location and has been repeatedly out of contact with his client for substantial periods of time, including one period for over two weeks. + +"Given these limitations, in the past five weeks, counsel has only been able to meet with his client on two occasions. Currently, there is no ability to e-mail the defendant, and phone contact is very limited. Even the sending and receipt of legal mail takes longer than the norm." + +Rothstein was to be sentenced May 6. The new date is June 9, at 9:30 a.m. + +Categories: [Legal Services](#), [Energy & the Environment](#) + People: [Scott Rothstein](#), [Marc Nurik](#), [Roberto Settineri](#) + < [Previous Post](#) + You must be logged in to post a comment. [Log in](#) or [Register](#). SHOWING 8 COMMENTS + Sort by [Newest first](#) [Subscribe by email](#) [Subscribe by RSS](#) + +[Comments powered by DSGoogle](#) + +SEARCH MORE Scott Rothstein: Picking Up The Pieces + + [Subscribe to Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces](#) +[RSS Feed](#) + +![](_page_23_Figure_62.jpeg) + +Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces Archive + April 2010 (5) March 2010 (5) + February 2010 (11) January 2010 (12) + December 2009 (21) November 2009 (7) + +**Featured South Florida Jobs** powered by BusinessJournals Help/Watched.com + +- [Claim Consultant Unleverweil Miami](#) - Tahl and Associates, LLC +- [View Open Opportunities](#) - AT&T +- [EXPERIENCED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER](#) - confidential +- [Licensed RNs and Allied Professionals: Open Hire Event at Tenet Hospitals](#) - Tenet Hospitals +- [Director of Emergency](#) + +More + +![](_page_23_Figure_65.jpeg) + +MOST VIEWED MOST COMMENTED + +- [Rothstein sentencing moved to June 9](#) +- [Addr settles fees with RRA estate](#) +- [Rothstein's honor Science to be deposed](#) +- [Szafranski assets frozen](#) +- [Rothstein's bad ques. Unclean or blost?](#) + +![](_page_23_Picture_67.jpeg) + +![](_page_24_Picture_13.jpeg) + +Use of, or registration on, this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. + +**ONLINE:** [boome](http://business.news) | [small.business](http://small.business) | [sales & marketing](http://sales.&marketing) | [mal.estate](http://mal.estate) | [events](http://events) | [directory](http://directory) | [careers](http://careers) | [city.guide](http://city.guide) | [advertise](http://advertise) | [about.us](http://about.us) | [css](http://css) + +**PRINT:** [subscribe](http://subscribe) | [cenew](http://cenew) | [advertise](http://advertise) | [book.of.lists](http://book.of.lists) | [business.intelligence](http://business.intelligence) | [classifieds](http://classifieds) | [view.digital.edition](http://view.digital.edition) | [article.reprints.rights](http://article.reprints.rights) | [purchase.single.copies](http://purchase.single.copies) + +**AFFILIATES:** [Portfolio](http://Portfolio) | [SportsBusiness.Journal](http://SportsBusiness.Journal) | [SportsBusiness.Daily](http://SportsBusiness.Daily) | [Sporting.News](http://Sporting.News) | [Mess.High.Tech](http://Mess.High.Tech) | [TechFlesh](http://TechFlesh) + +© 2010 American City Business Journals, Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of bizjournals. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# f it Palm Beach Feist Pent this page Close + +# Rottiste.n, Epstein scandals converge with sex cfender claiming he was used in swindle + +By JANE MUSGRAVE + +Palm Beach Post Staff Writer + +Updated: 7:51 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2009 + +Posted: 927 p.m. Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 + +Two of the biggest scandals to rock South Florida in recent years merged tod- attorneys representing billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit claiming t pa ti e Palm Beach resident is the victim of accused swindler Scott Rothstein. + +Rothstein, who is accused of running a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme from h Fo Lauderdale-based law firm, trumped up civil lawsuits against Epstein, according to the complaint d in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. He then lured investors by telling them Epstein had' greed to settle the lawsuits for as much as \$200 million and they could get a cut of the cash. + +The problem for investors, according to the lawsuit filed that Epstein never agreed to settle the lawsuits filed oS h , pseudonyms, such as Jane Doe. P m Beach attorney Robert Critton, is women who are identified only by + +"fr to "The offer of a \$200 million settlement by Epst was , mpietely fabricated," Critton wrote. "No such offer had ever been made." + +Epstein faces roughly two dozens lawsuits filed by women who claim they were teenagers when he lured them to his Palm Beach mansion and'paid them for massages and sex. The lawsuits started rolling in after he pleaded guilty in 2008 to felony toyditation of prostitution and procuring teenagers for prostitution. He was released fro jail in July after serving 13 months of an 18-month sentence. + +Attorneys who worked for Rothstein, including and former Palm Beach County Circuit Judge William Berger, handled-the three lawsjlitli. irm .iled. ut, they said, those represent only a fraction of the young omee'Vvh6 Epstein molested. + +"What the evidenc ally going to show is that Mr. Epstein . . . has every single day of his life made an attempt to sex I children," said at a July court hearing. "We're not talking about five, we're not talki abo t 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400 we're talking about thousandiotchildren." + +Such talk was part of a carefully orchestrated scheme to convince investors they stood to make millions by investing with Rothstein, Critton said. + +Likewise, Critton said, has said he intends to depose various luminaries to testify against Epstein. Former president Bill Clinton, business mogul Donald Trump, former Sony Record president Tommy Mottola and magician David Copperfield have all been identified in court papers as people that will be deposed. + +While friends or acquaintances of Epstein, they have no information about the women involved in the lawsuits, Critton said. + +"The sole purpose in the scheduling of these depositions or listing high profile friends/acquaintances as eionfiy4k. potential witnesses was, again, to 'pump' the cases to investors," Critton wrote. + +r%./t I IT," . + +Neither or Berger responded to phone calls for comment. + +Critton isn't the first to make allegations that Rothstein fabricated cases as a way to lure investors. + +Fort Lauderdale attorney William Scherer, who has filed a \$100 million lawsuit against Rothstein on behalf of scores of investors, has made similar claims. In a 147-page lawsuit, Scherer also said Rothstein told an investor about the phony \$200 million settlement offer from Epstein. + +"He would use . . cases as bait for luring investors into fictional cases," Scherer was quoted as saying. "All of the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one." + +Rothstein, a potent political fund-raiser who turned a small, unknown law firm into a powerhouse in seven short years, has pleaded not guilty to charges of RICO conspiracy, money-laundering conspiracy, mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud. His kingdom collapsed in late October when the feds ided his firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. It is now closed. He has been disbarred. + +Find this article at: + +http://www.palmbeachpost.cominewsicrime/rothsteimepstein-scandals-converge-wit -sex-o c) depclaiming-106327.html + +Print this page Close + +ligatfirlor's\* alter ONLINE hi a • 1)5 Months' Study days. nights, or weekends. Whenever an Ate eydyou choose. e1N 4/ Technical Colorado ,o id Request Into Now + +![](_page_27_Picture_81.jpeg) + +You are here SunSentinel.com > Collections > Lawsuit + +Ads by Google + +**Find a Lawyer - Free** +Find the Right Lawyer in Your Area Save Time - Describe Your Case Now! +[www.LegalMatch.com](http://www.LegalMatch.com) + +**Yasmin Injury Lawsuits** +Heart attack, stroke, organ injury, other major injuries. Free consult. +[www.Yasmininjury.info](http://www.Yasmininjury.info) + +**Injury Attorney HelpLine** +Helping Injured Victims For 25 yrs. Get a Free Local Consultation Now! +[www.injury-elabLineAttorney.com](http://www.injury-elabLineAttorney.com) + +**Victim of Negligence?** +Find Out If You Have a Case. No Legal Fees Unless You Succeed. +Present In, uni-Group.com + +**Free Case Evaluation** +Fast response about your case Serving Florida since 1970 +[www.stabinski-funt.com](http://www.stabinski-funt.com) + +FIND A FORE STORIES ABOUT + +- • Lawsuit +- • Ponzi Scheme + +FEATURED ARTICLES + +See The Video: Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein... +Support at 17:2009 + +Underage girl second to sue billionaire Cream at 11:2008 + +Federal agents seize Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott... +[www.stabinski-funt.com](http://www.stabinski-funt.com) + +## Epstein Claims Rothstein Link In Lawsuits + +December 10, 2009 | By Jane Musgrave The Palm Beach Post + +Blame the victim. + +It's the oldest trick in the book when it comes to dodging allegations of sexual abuse, according to attorneys representing more than a dozen women who are suing Palm Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, claiming he paid them for nude massages and sex when they were as young as 14. + +Epstein filed suit Monday in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, saying Ponzi scheme suspect Scott Rothstein trumped up lawsuits against him as part of a twisted money-making plan. But while aimed at the Fort Lauderdale attorney, it is nothing more than an effort to tamish the women, their attorneys said Tuesday. + +Ads by Google + +Advertisement + +### *1 Tip of a Flat Belly:* + +*Cut down 3 lbs of your belly every week by using this 1 weird tip.* + +![](_page_27_Picture_104.jpeg) + +## Denture Cream Lawsuit + +Side Effects After Denture Cream Use? Get Help Now. Free Case Review + +[www.ForThePeople.com](http://www.ForThePeople.com) + +"It's like a SLAPP suit," said attorney Sid [REDACTED], who is representing a woman who says she was 17 when she was molested by the 56-year-old financier. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to solicitation of prostitution and procuring teenagers for prostitution and served 13 months of an 18-month sentence. + +An acronym for "strategic lawsuit against public participation," SLAPPs are most commonly used by developers to silence critics by scaring them with the prospect of huge legal bills. + +"It's really not directed at Rothstein," [REDACTED] said of the lawsuit. "It's an attempt to make his victims look bad by association." + +Attorney Spencer Kuvin, who won a confidential settlement from Epstein for one woman and is representing another in a pending lawsuit, agreed. + +In the lawsuit filed by West Palm Beach attorney Robert Critton, Epstein claims Rothstein used the lawsuits to lure investors as part of a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme. Trumpeting the chance to turn a quick profit, Rothstein falsely reported that Epstein had agreed to settle the lawsuits for as much as \$200 million. By paying a discounted rate up front, they could ultimately cash in when the settlement was paid in full. + +Rothstein, whose law firm collapsed after federal agents raided it in late October, last week pleaded not guilty to charges that he made millions running similar schemes since 2005. + +Critton claims Rothstein, with the help of attorney [REDACTED], who worked for him, pumped up investors by teiling them they would call such luminaries as former President Bill Clinton, business tycoon Donald Trump and magician David Copperfield to testify against Epstein. The message was that Epstein would pay big to protect his celebrity friends. + +Ads by Google + +### Insurance claim? + +Not getting what you deserve? Free consultation with attorneys + +[www.stabinski-funt.com](http://www.stabinski-funt.com) + +![](_page_28_Figure_34.jpeg) + +Ads by Google + +![](_page_28_Figure_36.jpeg) + +FIND MORE STORIES ABOUT + +- • Lawsuit +- • Ponzi Scheme + +FEATURED ARTICLES + +See The Video: Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein... +September 17, 2009 + +Underage girl second to six billionaire Crime on August 8 + +Federal agents seize Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott... +November 10, 2009 + +Epstein Claims Rothstein Link In Lawsuits + +December 10, 2009 | By Jane Musgrave The Palm Beach Post + +(Page 2 of 2) + +In the lawsuit, Critton also goes after one of the three women who were represented by Rothstein's firm. Critton points up contradictions in sworn statements the woman, identified only as L.M., made to FBI agents compared with those she made once the lawsuit was filed. + +In an interview with an FBI agent in 2007, she described Epstein as "an awesome man" and described herself as a prostitute. + +She said none of the girls she took to Epstein ever complained. "They'd beg me, you know, for us to go to Jeffrey's house because they love Jeffrey. Jeffrey is a respectful man," she said. + +Ads by Google + +Yaz Lawsuit + +Experienced Attorneys Fighting For Your Rights. Call [REDACTED] & [REDACTED]. +www.ForThePeople.com + +![](_page_28_Figure_52.jpeg) + +In a September deposition, her story changed. "Once they were there, they were scared out of their mind," she said. "They did it any ways and some of them walked out and said, 'L.M., don't ever do this to me again. This is the worst thing that ever happened to me.'" + +Critton said none of the women who are suing Epstein for millions were drugged or coerced. They came to his Palm Beach mansion freely. Many came 20, 30 or 40 times, some well after they turned 18. Further, he said, many either were or later became prostitutes or strippers. Any psychological problems they had had occurred well before they hooked up with Epstein. + +Kuvin said such claims miss the point. + +"This case is about whether or not a young girl has the capability to consent to inappropriate sexual contact." if a 14-year-old asked an adult to go get drunk, it's the adult's responsibility to stop her - not to drive her to the bar, he said. In these cases, he said, Epstein solicited underage girls for sex. + +Ads by Google + +**Yaz Birth Control Lawsuit** +Legal Settlements for Victims Of Birth Control - Free Legal Consult. +www.YazAttorney.net + +![](_page_29_Picture_2.jpeg) + +![](_page_29_Picture_3.jpeg) + +Powered by eakkabliny + +# Pervy Billionaire a Rothstein "Victim" + +# Billionaire sex offender suing alleged Ponzi schemek 0 + +By 3RIAN HAMACHER + +Updated I:30 PM EDT. Me. Dec 8.3009 + +![](_page_29_Picture_9.jpeg) + +AP + +Billionaire underag r Jeffrey Epstein isn't exactly a sympathetic figure, and his alleged weakness for es may have made him a target for accused con man Scott Rothstein. + +The Palm Beach mogul is accusing the alleged Fort Lauderdale Ponzi schemer of filing trumped-up sexual harassment lawsuits against him to help proliferate his massive \$1.2 billion scam, run through his Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. + +In a lawsuit filed today, Epstein alleges Rothstein told investors they'd get their hands on the nearly \$200 million in settlements that Epstein had worked out with RRA, according to the Palm Beach Post. + +Problem is, Epstein hadn't agreed to pay out. + +"The offer of a \$200 million settlement by Epstein was completely fabricated," the suit reads. "No such offer had ever been made." + +To make matters worse, Rothstein's lawyers were planning on calling some of Epstein's high profile buddies to testify in the cases, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield. + +"The sole purpose in the scheduling of these depositions or listing high profile friends/acquaintances as potential witnesses was, again, to 'pump' the cases to investors," the lawsuit reads. + +Rothstein, 47, is currently being held in a Miami federal prison, after he was charged last week with five counts related to his scheme, including fraud and racketeering. + +Epstein, 56, is a successful financier who pled guilty to procuring teenagers for prostitution in 2008 and did 13 months behind bars. + +First Published: Dec 8.2009 1:11 PM EDT + +Find tills article at: + +httpetwww.nbcmiamicomfnewitilocal•beatfPervy-Billionaire-a-Rolhsten-Victim-78784972.hen + +Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. + +\*NBC l nnersal. Inc. ' All Rights Reserved + +Tort aw + +### Billionaire Sex Offender's Racketeering Suit: Rothstein Lawyers Lied About Me + +Posted Dec 9, 2009 6:50 PM CDT + +By Martha Neil + +Just when it might have seemed that alleged wrongdoing related to the spectacular downfall of Ro stein Rosenfeld! Adler could not become more bizarre, a billionaire convicted sex offender has filed racketeering lawsuit against two onetime partners of the South Florida law firm. + +Contending that they prejudiced his defense of criminal and civil actions related to his xual activities with underage teens by lying about the facts in order to 'pump" a \$1.2 billion Ponzi sche that ade use of the law firm name, Jeffrey Epstein is seeking injunctive relief, unspecified damages in e ,000 and attorney fees. Among other allegations, his Palm Beach Circuit Court suit contends that Scott othstein, as well as others at the firm, falsely claimed to investors in the Ponzi scheme that Epstein had offered to a \$200 million settlement and acted illegally and unethically in civil litigation against him that is sti A copy of the complaint (PDF), which was filed Monday, is provide jr th Law Dail . In addition to criminal practices and racketeering counts, it asserts claims for abuse of r ud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Factually, it alleges that Rothstein and unspecified co-cons ed federal court orders and opinions, improperly intercepted conversations and pursued a litig %Nio o rategy unrelated to the merits of their clients' cases 52 female clients in Epstein-related matters, the su s, w n in fact he had filed only 'weak" cases on behalf of exacty three young women. As detailed in earlier ABAJournal.com post and chief executive officer, is now jailed multiple lawsuits. Rothstein also agre who until recently was the RRA firm's managing partner fraud case and the dissolving law firm is in receivership, facing his Florida law license. Attorney Marc Nurik, a former RRA p er ho is representing Rothstein in the criminal case, was not immediately available for comment, the Arn Law Dai y states. Epstein's suit was filed by atto AddlIcnal coverag ASIA y obert Critton Jr. of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman in West Palm Beach. aire's Secret Sex Case Plea Deal Shows What a Good Defense Can Do" AB ing: Rothstein Made \$35M in 2008: Name Partner: I Wasn't Paid \$6M" Palm Bach t: "Billionaire sex offender says he's a victim of Scott Rothstein" Palm Beach Post: "Victims' lawyers say sex offenders lawsuit aimed at scaring female victims" Copyright 2010 American Bar Association. All rights reserved. + +and their clients' interests in order to further the claimed % i eme. Rothstein told investors that he represented + +Share Report Abuse Next Blog" Create Slog Sign In + +![](_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg) + +MURSDAY, DEC EMBER 10. 2009 + +-using Epstein v. Rothstein Suit + +![](_page_32_Picture_8.jpeg) + +![](_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg) + +Palm Beach lawyers Robert Critton and Michael Pike hays filed wit on behalf of Palm Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein against Rothstein and former RRA attorney J. in Palm Beach state court. + +You can read the complaint here. + +Donate Now -- Crisis in Haiti + +![](_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg) + +An ABA Journal Top 100 Blawgl + +![](_page_32_Picture_14.jpeg) + +Subscribe To SFL + +Anonymous Tips + +couthillawyenGstmail. Corn + +Much of the suit is a rehash of the Ponzi scheme allegations, and how Rothstein would talk up all the victims his firm represented that were reaching settlements with Epstein, except for some reason Epstein always had to pay out over time, even though the victims wanted the money right now. + +In actuality, according to the suit, RRA only represented three victims in pending litigation •• one in federal court, and two in state court. The complaint alleges that Epstein has been harmed in his defense of these suits, for a number of reasons. + +In particular, the suit really goes after S alleging that he knew or should have known that Rothstein was using the existing cases for purposes of promoting the Ponzi scheme. The complaint alleges that the RRA "Litigation Team" served discovery that was unrelated to the three claims they were handling but with the sole purpose of 'pumping" the Ponzi Scheme and luring new investors. + +Specifically, the complaint alleges that RRA went after records of flights aboard Epstein's private jet where high-profile celebritie allegedly on board when sexual assaults supposedly took pl, that the Litigation Team sought the depositions of these S le c iti . + +allegedly took unnecessary depositions ofLTie p nd asked inflammatory questions allegedly for the mping" the attractiveness of the Ponzi scheme. + +The witnesses allegedly on ttSt included The Donald, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Cll ), Tommy Mottola, and illusionist David Copperfield(?). egedl othstein would then go on to tell potential investors that Eps s settling all these cases in order to protect his high- friends. + +The complaint on to detSil other alleged discovery irregularities, Including a de. of Epstein (in which Adler was In attendant a to s of inflammatory questions were allegedly asked sdt of the deposition could be shown to new investors. + +The ibceptaint also alleges that went overboard at hearings, and wit overstated the extent of Epstein's alleged crimes again Just to pump the scheme. Further, the complaint alleges that confidential client files of the three existing RRA cases against Epstein were shown to potential investors to Induce them to Invest, and that as a result the attorney-client privilege has been waived. + +The claims sound in Florida RICO, fraud, abuse of process etc. + +What to make of all this? + +Since the alleged discovery abuses occurred in the context of pending civil suits. Epstein's complaint raises the obvious Question why the + +### Rumpole + +David O. Markus SD FL Blog + +Cocaine Princess + +### Slogs I Read + +A Grand Ilusion + +AbovetheLaw + +plawg Review + +Br rd + +ghts and Campaigns + +DBR's Inside Track + +Discourse + +Eve on Miami + +FLA Politics + +Glenn Greenwald + +Hands On Miami + +Jurist + +Lffiog , + +Menage a Law + +My Law License + +NROS The Corner + +Opinio Juris + +Pooehat + +Random Pixels + +Riptide + +Scotusblog + +SF08 + +Shoot The Lawyers + +The Cvber Sleuth + +The Daily Pulp + +The Legal Satyricon + +THR. Esa. + +TPM + +US Law Slogs + +Wolcott + +presiding judge in those cases should not be dealing with the alleged Blog Archive lawyer misconduct? P. 2010 (152) + +• 2009 (588) + +Moreover, the allegations against all involve serving allegedly outrageous discovery, making outrageous statements in court hearings, or doing outrageous things in pleadings. That places the allegations of the complaint at odds with the traditional protections afforded attorneys in the performance of their legal duties. + +I have no idea whether the allegations against are meritorious, or perhaps Epstein is trying to leverage the Rothstein revelations to assist him in defense of his pending suits. + +Either way the case is likely not going very far, and Epstein probably will have to seek his remedies if any in the pending cases where the alleged discovery misconduct took place. + +The more interesting jurisprudential question is what remedy, if any, could investors (as opposed to Epstein) have if they were induced invest as a result of the lawyer activities detailed in the compla + +When you step back, the entire Rothstein saga, with its pathetic twists, should cause the courts and policyma bit more clearly the extent to which lawyers shout protection when they practice law which in circumstance certainly makes sense -• as op misusing and abusing the law and a Bar incomprehensibly massive (not to fraud. del e a ded allegedly r to execute an moneymaking + +Labels: ichael J. Pike, Robert D. Critton Jr., S. Adler, Scott Rothstein + +### 8 cormetr. + +center junkie said... + +iri -uit is a crock KIDDZZZ,leave the lawyers alone LOVE + +m r 2:4 PM + +Anonymous said... + +Where did SFL find the Robert Critton wall sticker set? + +December 10. 2009 3:01 PM + +Anonymous said... + +The complaint talks about Judge Berger too. + +December 10. 2009 4:15 PM + +• December (63) + +This Is The Year That Was. + +Torn Lehman Talks/Buys Wine In the NYT + +3d DCA Watch -- Ding Done Dine Done + +"Lo if la + +Marc tinue T + +Parsing the RRA Financials + +Fluiu Banton Hires David Oscar Markus! + +Herald New Math + +Merry Christmas Everyone!! + +Judged Reversed On Forum Non Banana Boat + +Merry Christmas Darling + +3d DCA Watch Geometric geRnOR And Mistletoe Edi... + +Details of the Rothstein Auction + +jYawn). Some Legal Stuff. + +Christmas Dream + +Thanks Joe! + +SFL Monday Welcome Winter! + +What Happened To Gary's Bonus?? + +SFL Friday - A Piece of the Action? + +Don't Be That Guy. + +Mele Katikimaka + +For Cheapskates Only + +When's The Right Time To Raise Rule 11 in A Pleadi... + +Exclusive Inside Marc Hunks Briefcase! + +March 29, 2010 + +This is the print preview: Back to normal view + +## Jeffrey Epstein Sues Accused Ponzi Schemer Scott Rothstein For Misusing His Name + +First Posted: 12-11-09 11:17 AM Updated: 12-11-09 12:27 PM + +![](_page_35_Picture_6.jpeg) + +It's hard to know w orida financiers when two disgraced n. + +CityFile report pstein, who eenage giryo chemer Scott Ro naire money manager Jeffrey months in jail for soliciting a ion, is taking aim at accused Ponzi ein. + +this year, state authorities charged Rothstein, a - rida lawyer and powerful political fundraiser, a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme. + +According the suit, Rothstein an( his la firm's partners used Epstein's name to lure investors into his alleged scheme. Essentially,ihefloit says, Rothstein's firm claimed to have secured a \$200 million settlement with Epstein td used that amount to "pump' a fraudulent investment scheme. + +The suit also argue that Rd stein's firm claimed to represent 52 women who claimed to have been sexually abuse Epstein. In fact, Rothstein's firm only represented three such women in cases the suit des weak." + +Is Epstein the compl allegedly egg-shaped penis, just piling on Rothstein's misfortunes? Read urself (hat tip to ABA Journal). + +Story continues below + +rothstein-complaint•1 + +## Florida Practice Guides for all major practice areas + +![](_page_36_Picture_22.jpeg) + +[Law.com Home](#) +[Newswire](#) +[LawJobs](#) +[CLE Center](#) +[LawCatalog](#) +[Our Sites](#) +[Advertise](#) + +An ALM Web site + +# THE AMLAW DAILY + +- [This Site](#) +- [Law.com Network](#) +- [Legal Web](#) + +Search the Legal Web [Go to](#) + +- [HOME](#) +- [THE AMLAW DAILY](#) +- [LITIGATION DAILY](#) +- [RANKINGS](#) +- [VIDEOS](#) +- [MAGAZINE](#) +- [ADVERTISE](#) +- [SUBSCRIBE](#) +- [FREE ACCESS](#) +- [CONTACT US](#) + +## THE AM LAW DAILY + +- [The Firms](#) +- [The Work](#) +- [The Score](#) +- [The Churn](#) +- [The Talent](#) +- [The Management](#) +- [The World](#) +- [The Life](#) + +## SURVEYS AND RANKINGS + +- [AMLAW 100](#) +- [AMLAW 200](#) +- [AMLAW TECH](#) +- [A-LIST](#) +- [GLOBAL 100](#) +- [CORPORATE SCORECARD](#) +- [DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR](#) +- [MIDLEVEL ASSOCIATES SURVEY](#) +- [SUMMER ASSOCIATES SURVEY](#) +- [PRO BONO SCORECARD](#) +- [LITIGATION DEPARTMENT OF THE YEAR](#) +- [LATERALS REPORT](#) +- [Lifetime Achievers](#) +- [Legal Intelligence](#) + +## MAGAZINE + +- [Current Issue](#) +- [Previous Issue](#) +- [Search Archive](#) + +### The Wor + +December 8, 2009 PM + +### Billionaire Slaps Scott Rothstein With Suit + +Posted by Brian Baxter + +The almost daily developments in the bizarre saga of disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein stein almost too outlandish to be true. Hem's the latest. + +On Monday, sibling publication the Daily Business Review reported that the federal govenunent will have first date on Rothstein's seized property if he is convicted, noting that the fraud allegations against Rothstein have hit the St.6 billion mark. + +Now, another notorious Floridian has entered the picture. + +Billionaire money manager and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has filed suit against Rothstein, chiming that the disbarred lawyer touted a fictitious \$200 million sexual harassment settlement that Epstein was willing to pay as a guise to lure investors into his Postai scheme. Epstein, represented by Robert Clifton, Ir , of West Palm Beach's Burman - on I uttier & Coleman filed his civil suit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court late Monday. + +### LAW FIRM INC + +### Litiaation 2008 + +### FOCUS EUROPE + +### STUDENT EDITION + +### VIDEOS + +### Hall cf Fame + +### INCISIVE MEDIA EVENTS + +### SUBSCRIBE + +### ADVERTISE + +### ABOUT US + +### FEATURED SPONSORS + +![](_page_37_Picture_13.jpeg) + +- Martindale awver locator +- Counsel Financial Service.; +- Pies Inc +- ErLaxt + +### LAW.COM NETWORK + +- o Sites . Maa +- Imam o lancilligg o Wan +- Online CLE O Legal Intelligence o Events O Resources o Law Firm +- C. Cr itRroortas o pwal Dictionary O o al + +Cos + +Comments: + +### Comments (0\ + +Save 8 Share: Feccbook Del it outI Dtqc ItIfaxli + +### Resumes e< Peroussione + +### Cone ants + +Report offensive comments to The Am Law Daily + +### Post a comment + +If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please e' n) + +Name: + +i lill Email Address:(Not displayed with commi! y + +Cr + +URL + +0 Remember.... . + +Post + +### Make a comment + +According to the 16-Dace complaint Epstein accuses Rothstein of 'engaging in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, actionable frauds, and . egregious civil litigation abuses' that damaged Epstein and others. The complaint also accuses Rothstein of forging federal court orders and opinions. + +In an interview with The Am Law Daily, Craton lashed out at Rothstein for fraudulently claiming that his client had agreed to pay S200 million to settle civil sexual harassment charges filed against Epstein by several women after the scandalous allegations against him first came to hat in 2005.(In June 2008 Epstein's all-star legal team negotiated a plea to two Prostitution chases that infunated Palm Beach's police chief, who had already mitten a letter criticizing pale prosecutors, Epstein was released this July after serving almost a year in prison.) + +Three of the sexual harassment suits were filed by lawyers working for Rothstein. Critton says those same lawyers falsely claimed to represent many more women with potential claims against Epstein. The additional women never actually existed, Cntton says, adding that they were merely introduced to entice investors to fund litigation against his client. + +Asa result, Critton says Epstein had to spend more money on his defense in those criminal cases, and his lawyers wound up engaging in frivolous discovery and depositions. The additional cost was between fl00,000 to \$200,000, Critton says, adding that the whole matter has only complicated efforts to resolve current cases pending against the billionaire. + +'Instead of a defendant having a legitimate discussion with a plaintiff to resolve a case, {Rothstein's] out there pitching million in from these other cases he claims to have,' he says. Critton adds that Rothstein's 'abusive litigation tactics' included trying to depose 'extraneous ind• • would embarrass Epstein. + +Those individuals include Bill Clinton, David Copperfield, and Donald Trump—all close friends of Epstein who traveled vr plane. (Rothstein sought access to flight records and other information that he could show to potential investors to oney manager on his private to a nine-figure settlement.) + +Critton declined to comment on the damages Epstein is seeking from Rothstein over the alleged settlement clai least 5100,000 and more than that if damages are trebled. CrittOn has yet to hear from lawyers for Rothstein o whether claims will be brought against other members of Rothstein's defunct firm, Rothstein Rosenfeld' Ad inted that the amount will be at says he hasn't yet decided + +'I'm taking baby steps on this,' says Cntton no granter to hiah-profile sex suits + +Rothstein's criminal lawyer, Marc Nurik, a former partner at RRA, was not immediately availablfent. + +I14.e + +4;l c LesV?CISV + +Popular Pages Today + +- I. Nothina Personal am. +- 2. Rolm.. Cooley Dunn Simpson in Coffee vim0 ix% +- 3. DLA Abandons I Arkin 1,an + +- 4. [Kirkland Names New Chair](#) 11.046 +- 5. [The Am Law Daily](#) 10.075 +- 6. [Billionaire Slaps Scott Rothstein With Suit](#) 6.026 +- 7. [The Am Law Daily](#) 6.036 +- 8. [New Century Defendants Lawyer Up](#) 6.075 +- 9. [Wachtell's Herlihy Helping BofA Board Select New CEO](#) 4.026 +- 10. [Fried \[REDACTED\] Paul Weiss Advise on Shopping Spree](#) 3.076 + [\[REDACTED\] to Get \[REDACTED\] FEEDUT](#) + +![](_page_39_Picture_25.jpeg) + +| SIGN-UP for FREE E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS | | +|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| > Am. Law Daily | > Litigation Daily | +| from AmericanLawyer.com | | + +**From the Law.com Newswire** + +[Supreme Court Rejects Early Appeals of Attorney-Client Privilege Determinations](#) + +[In Rare Move, Debevoise Sues Client Over \\$6 Million in Unpaid Bills](#) + +[High Court Justices Take Aim at 'Honest Services' Law](#) + +[Can Tech Shows Boost a Firm's Bottom Line?](#) + +[Drinker \[REDACTED\] Bulks Up in Los Angeles](#) + +- [Sign up to receive](#) +- [\[REDACTED\] Legal Blog Watch by email](#) +- [\[REDACTED\] View a Sample](#) + +**Advertisement** + +**Advertisement** + +![](_page_39_Picture_36.jpeg) + +Creative Visions Foundation uses media & the arts to inspire and support creative activists who believe in the power of individuals to change our world for the better. + +![]()About ALM | About Law.com | Customer Support +Copyright 2009. ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. + +![](_page_40_Picture_11.jpeg) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 3I"SINESS INSIDER 31WW Review + +# Billionaire Sex Offender Sues Scott Rothstei \$200 Million Settlement Offer + +c-3eifi: I Dec. 10, 2A199, 7:43 AM I 892 I + +"Just when it might have seemed that alleged wrongdoing related to the spectacular downfall of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler could not become more bizarre, a billionaire convicted sex offender has filed a civil racketeering lawsuit against two onetime partners of the South Florida law firm." + +Thus begins Martha Neil's article for the ABA Jcurnal about jailed Florid now-forme: attorney Scott Rothstein, and really, there other way to begin. + +According to the complain aintiff •ict-ey Epstein is a defendant in th-ee civil actip\* alleging sexual assault filed-by Rothstein's former firm. The complaint alleges the RRA atorneys lied about the facts of Epstein's case to support their ?onzi scheme. + +The suit says that Rothstein and other RRA lawyers said Eptstein had offered a \$200 million settlement. Epstein said no such offer was ever made. + +![](_page_41_Picture_8.jpeg) + +See Also: + +![](_page_41_Picture_10.jpeg) + +Georgia Supreme Court Nixes Medical Malpractice Caps + +![](_page_41_Picture_12.jpeg) + +Lateral Moves Plunge In Texas In 2009 + +![](_page_41_Picture_14.jpeg) + +First Health Care Suit Is Filed Courtesy Of State Attorneys General + +The complaint alleged the defendants filed false court documents, improperly interclitigation strategies designed to aid their scheme, rather than what was in their client + +Tags: Law Firms, Ponzi schemes, [REDACTED]-collar crime, Litigation + +Share: + +- Twitter +- Facebook +- Buzz +- Digg +- StumbleUpon +- Buzz +- R +- Embed +- Newsletter + +### O'EN Forum + +The [REDACTED] forum is a [REDACTED] portal that has been considered a study for a consultation by the [REDACTED] for the purpose of facilitating Not so mannerly and the [REDACTED] forum to give the [REDACTED] spot, Not so little [REDACTED] study for [REDACTED]. + +The study was done by a formating and regarding foreign student associated by that forum uncontrolled by the [REDACTED] forum for small [REDACTED] students. The [REDACTED] forum is a [REDACTED] for the purpose of continuing [REDACTED] students. + +![](_page_42_Picture_36.jpeg) + +![](_page_42_Picture_37.jpeg) + +Erin Geiger Smith is Editor of Law Review of Business Insider. + +Contact: +e-mail: esmith@businessinsider.com +Subscribe to her twitter feed + +- Ret +- Ex-I +- Pos +- Sup + +4 Comments ] ] + +[REDACTED] on Dec 10, 7:46 AM said: +Epstein? Rothstein? I'm seeing a trend here! +Reply + +![](_page_43_Picture_31.jpeg) + +# Courthouse News Service + +Wednesday, December 16, 2009 Last Update: 9:32 AM PT + +![](_page_43_Picture_34.jpeg) + +## Dizzying Claims Against Disbarred Attorney + +By IZZY KAPNICK + +ShareThis + +WEST PALM BEACH (CN) - A Palm Beach billionaire convicted of soliciting sex from minors has sued alleged Ponzi scheme operator Scott Rothstein, a disbarred attorney, claiming Rothstein used the sexual indiscretions as a springboard to pursue frivolous molestation suits. Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager disgraced in an underage prostitution scandal, says Rothstein tried to capitalize on the conviction by encouraging clients to fabricate allegations of sexual assault. + +Rothstein was arrested in November in connection with an alleged \$1.2 billion investment scam. He had been telling investors they could make huge profits by contributing to a fund that bought structured settlement receivables. FBI investigators say. + +According to the FBI, Rothstein told the duped investors that his clients wanted their lawsuit settlement cash right away and were willing to sell him the right to receive the structured payments in exchange for a discounted hump sum. + +But Rothstein was flying all the while, the FBI says. Investigators say Rothstein never organized the purchase of the receivables, and that many of the settlements he advertised were fake. + +Rothstein went so far as to show investors bogus court documents to lure them into the scheme, investigators say. + +Among the allegedly phony settlements was a \$200 million payout that Rothstein claimed Epstein had arranged for more than 20 vicinities of sexual assaults and molestation. + +In his complaint in Palm Beach County Court, Epstein says that "settlement" was one of Rothstein's concections. Rothstein was simply trying to cash in on the publicity surrounding the solicitation investigation, Epstein says. + +Epstein claims that Rothstein lined up a slew of frivolous sexual assault and molestation lawsuits for clients who Epstein says were willing sex workers. + +[REDACTED], an attorney at Rothstein's firm and a defendant in Epstein's complaint, forwarded particularly reckless allegations. Epstein says. + +"The evidence is really going to show [that] Epstein ... has, every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. We're not talking about five. We're not talking about 20. We're not talking about 400, which I believe is the number known to law enforcement. We're talking about thousands of children," [REDACTED] allegedly said in a court proceeding cited in Epstein's complaint. + +These assertions are absurd, Epstein says. + +The Palm Beach Police Department's investigation of Epstein may complicate his case, however. + +The police investigation alleges that in 2003, Epstein enlisted a 17-year-old girl to recruit high school classmates to visit him for "massages" at his Palm Beach mansion. Epstein paid the girls \$200 to \$300 per visit to strip down and massage him while he pleasured himself. The lid was blown off when the youngest of the girls, then 14, told her parents about the escapades. + +Epstein's recruiter and the girls have acknowledged that they knew what to expect, detectives say. According to the investigation, the 17-year-old explained to the girls what would happen in Epstein's massage room, according to the police report. + +Epstein cut a deal with federal agents to plead guilty to procuring minors for prostitution. + +When the scandal was publicized, hordes of young women came out of the woodwork accusing Epstein of sexual battery. Many of the resultant cases were dismissed, including that of transgendered model Maximilia [REDACTED]. + +Epstein claims that Rothstein's clients in the cases against him included a self-described prostitute who changed her story repeatedly. + +In an early interview with FBI agents, cited in Epstein's complaint, the prostitute, who admitted to having frequently brought young women to Epstein's house for sex work, claimed, "Every girl that I brought to Jeffrey ... said they were fine with it. ... A lot of girls begged me to bring them back for the money, and as far as I know, we all had fun there." + +But Epstein says that after Rothstein recruited her as a client in a sexual assault suit, the prostitute reversed her tone. "Once [the girls] were [at Epstein's house], they were scared out of their minds. They did it anyways, and some of them walked out and said, 'Don't ever do this to me again,'" the woman stated in a deposition. + +Epstein demands damages from Rothstein for conspiracy and abuse of process. + +[Home](#) [Back to Top](#) +[Courthouse News Service](#) [Privacy Policy](#) [Search](#) [BBS](#) [Contact Us](#) + +--- + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/EFTA02759703.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/EFTA02759703.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..092fe49264134548cf436b9300f8c313e1b8d2ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/EFTA02759703.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3447 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 45, + "chars": 76071, + "elapsed_seconds": 31.03, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_23_Figure_40.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_41.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_49.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_52.jpeg", + "_page_23_Figure_62.jpeg", + "_page_23_Figure_65.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_67.jpeg", + "_page_24_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_81.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_104.jpeg", + "_page_28_Figure_34.jpeg", + "_page_28_Figure_36.jpeg", + "_page_28_Figure_52.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_6.jpeg", + "_page_36_Picture_22.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_39_Picture_25.jpeg", + "_page_39_Picture_36.jpeg", + "_page_40_Picture_11.jpeg", + "_page_41_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_41_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_41_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_41_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_42_Picture_36.jpeg", + "_page_42_Picture_37.jpeg", + "_page_43_Picture_31.jpeg", + "_page_43_Picture_34.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO \nROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.82999999999998, + 314.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 465.68658447265625, + 314.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 465.68658447265625, + 343.3000183105469 + ], + [ + 181.82999999999998, + 343.3000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Background and Procedural Posture", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.644, + 411.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 431.3690490722656, + 411.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 431.3690490722656, + 426.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 215.644, + 426.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Legal Standard \u2014 Setting Aside Default", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.90200000000004, + 596.4 + ], + [ + 437.8839111328125, + 596.4 + ], + [ + 437.8839111328125, + 612.4335174560547 + ], + [ + 209.90200000000004, + 612.4335174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein's Affidavit Does Nothing to Establish a Meritorious Defense", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.13400000000001, + 277.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 527.55029296875, + 277.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 527.55029296875, + 294.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 123.13400000000001, + 294.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein's Failure to Respond to the \nComplaint Was Not the Result of Excusable Neglect", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.26000000000002, + 98.04600000000002 + ], + [ + 474.57830810546875, + 98.04600000000002 + ], + [ + 474.57830810546875, + 127.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 172.26000000000002, + 127.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ztothstein Fails to Establish Due Diligence in Moving to Set Aside the Default", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.166, + 666.1659999999999 + ], + [ + 543.5759999999999, + 666.1659999999999 + ], + [ + 543.5759999999999, + 683.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 100.166, + 683.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.186, + 583.2479999999999 + ], + [ + 357.4533386230469, + 583.2479999999999 + ], + [ + 357.4533386230469, + 598.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 285.186, + 598.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.304, + 99.002 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 99.002 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 113.265 + ], + [ + 260.304, + 113.265 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN/ OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.55800000000002, + 89.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 408.3754577636719, + 89.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 408.3754577636719, + 105.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 217.55800000000002, + 105.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.154, + 89.88 + ], + [ + 525.074, + 89.88 + ], + [ + 525.074, + 145.32 + ], + [ + 308.154, + 145.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED SUMMONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.20000000000002, + 322.56 + ], + [ + 389.81800000000004, + 322.56 + ], + [ + 389.81800000000004, + 335.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 255.20000000000002, + 335.15999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL SERVICE ON A NATURAL PERSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.296, + 363.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.36, + 363.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.36, + 377.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 186.296, + 377.15999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.186, + 488.87999999999994 + ], + [ + 359.832, + 488.87999999999994 + ], + [ + 359.832, + 501.48 + ], + [ + 285.186, + 501.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.996, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 365.57399999999996, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 365.57399999999996, + 152.88 + ], + [ + 281.996, + 152.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IMPORTANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.65200000000004, + 400.68 + ], + [ + 357.28000000000003, + 400.68 + ], + [ + 357.28000000000003, + 414.96 + ], + [ + 289.65200000000004, + 414.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nCase No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.57, + 86.829 + ], + [ + 562.0780000000001, + 86.829 + ], + [ + 562.0780000000001, + 153.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 328.57, + 153.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF CARLOS AGUIRtO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.042, + 275.661 + ], + [ + 451.072998046875, + 275.661 + ], + [ + 451.072998046875, + 291.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 229.042, + 291.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFAUL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.1, + 341.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 363.65999999999997, + 341.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 363.65999999999997, + 359.7598876953125 + ], + [ + 287.1, + 359.7598876953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.602, + 81.383 + ], + [ + 557.4737548828125, + 81.383 + ], + [ + 557.4737548828125, + 125.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 305.602, + 125.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT W. ltO \nIN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SE' DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.364, + 332.24399999999997 + ], + [ + 475.8433532714844, + 332.24399999999997 + ], + [ + 475.8433532714844, + 361.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 177.364, + 361.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.29, + 105.0 + ], + [ + 507.21000000000004, + 105.0 + ], + [ + 507.21000000000004, + 159.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 290.29, + 159.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.50999999999999, + 336.0 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 336.0 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 352.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 92.50999999999999, + 352.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.29, + 92.29 + ], + [ + 507.21000000000004, + 92.29 + ], + [ + 507.21000000000004, + 146.825 + ], + [ + 290.29, + 146.825 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.98, + 323.015 + ], + [ + 526.35, + 323.015 + ], + [ + 526.35, + 339.795 + ], + [ + 133.98, + 339.795 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "South Florida BUSINESS JOURNAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.374, + 124.713 + ], + [ + 223.3, + 124.713 + ], + [ + 223.3, + 153.171 + ], + [ + 110.374, + 153.171 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Blog: Scott Rothstein: Picking up the Pieces", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.99400000000001, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 261.58, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 261.58, + 221.805 + ], + [ + 103.99400000000001, + 221.805 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Sentencing Moved To June 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.374, + 234.36000000000004 + ], + [ + 261.58, + 234.36000000000004 + ], + [ + 261.58, + 263.65500000000003 + ], + [ + 110.374, + 263.65500000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f it Palm Beach Feist Pent this page Close", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.75, + 69.3143310546875 + ], + [ + 574.8866577148438, + 69.3143310546875 + ], + [ + 574.8866577148438, + 109.56060791015625 + ], + [ + 79.75, + 109.56060791015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rottiste.n, Epstein scandals converge with sex \ncfender claiming he was used in swindle", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.75, + 123.333 + ], + [ + 515.0025024414062, + 123.333 + ], + [ + 515.0025024414062, + 173.9481201171875 + ], + [ + 79.75, + 173.9481201171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIND A FORE STORIES ABOUT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.38799999999999, + 440.475 + ], + [ + 167.794, + 440.475 + ], + [ + 167.794, + 449.704 + ], + [ + 80.38799999999999, + 449.704 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEATURED ARTICLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.38799999999999, + 491.65399999999994 + ], + [ + 146.74, + 491.65399999999994 + ], + [ + 146.74, + 500.883 + ], + [ + 80.38799999999999, + 500.883 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Claims Rothstein Link In Lawsuits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.246, + 169.478 + ], + [ + 446.6, + 169.478 + ], + [ + 446.6, + 184.58 + ], + [ + 202.246, + 184.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 Tip of a Flat Belly:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 427.46000000000004, + 306.23499999999996 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 306.23499999999996 + ], + [ + 567.82, + 324.693 + ], + [ + 427.46000000000004, + 324.693 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Denture Cream Lawsuit", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.246, + 331.405 + ], + [ + 311.98199999999997, + 331.405 + ], + [ + 311.98199999999997, + 343.99 + ], + [ + 202.246, + 343.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Insurance claim?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.246, + 670.361 + ], + [ + 282.634, + 670.361 + ], + [ + 282.634, + 682.107 + ], + [ + 202.246, + 682.107 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIND MORE STORIES ABOUT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.11200000000001, + 488.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 167.794, + 488.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 167.794, + 498.12 + ], + [ + 79.11200000000001, + 498.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEATURED ARTICLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.11200000000001, + 539.28 + ], + [ + 146.74, + 539.28 + ], + [ + 146.74, + 548.52 + ], + [ + 79.11200000000001, + 548.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Claims Rothstein Link In Lawsuits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.60800000000003, + 170.52 + ], + [ + 446.6, + 170.52 + ], + [ + 446.6, + 185.64000000000001 + ], + [ + 201.60800000000003, + 185.64000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Yaz Lawsuit", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.60800000000003, + 346.08 + ], + [ + 260.304, + 346.08 + ], + [ + 260.304, + 357.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 201.60800000000003, + 357.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pervy Billionaire a Rothstein \"Victim\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.456, + 182.902 + ], + [ + 480.3367614746094, + 182.902 + ], + [ + 480.3367614746094, + 211.19757080078125 + ], + [ + 71.456, + 211.19757080078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire sex offender suing alleged Ponzi schemek \n0", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.456, + 223.174 + ], + [ + 493.19195556640625, + 223.174 + ], + [ + 493.19195556640625, + 304.845947265625 + ], + [ + 71.456, + 304.845947265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire Sex Offender's Racketeering Suit: Rothstein Lawyers Lied About \nMe", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.836, + 108.23100000000001 + ], + [ + 567.182, + 108.23100000000001 + ], + [ + 567.182, + 146.782958984375 + ], + [ + 77.836, + 146.782958984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.836, + 532.765 + ], + [ + 174.812, + 532.765 + ], + [ + 174.812, + 545.35 + ], + [ + 77.836, + 545.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rumpole", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.01200000000006, + 92.29 + ], + [ + 470.0610046386719, + 92.29 + ], + [ + 470.0610046386719, + 105.232421875 + ], + [ + 430.01200000000006, + 105.232421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Slogs I Read", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 418.528, + 150.18099999999998 + ], + [ + 473.6024169921875, + 150.18099999999998 + ], + [ + 473.6024169921875, + 162.982421875 + ], + [ + 418.528, + 162.982421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "8 cormetr.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.116, + 526.053 + ], + [ + 184.34530639648438, + 526.053 + ], + [ + 184.34530639648438, + 541.60302734375 + ], + [ + 116.116, + 541.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.16600000000005, + 81.383 + ], + [ + 474.034, + 81.383 + ], + [ + 474.034, + 91.451 + ], + [ + 419.16600000000005, + 91.451 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein Sues Accused Ponzi Schemer \nScott Rothstein For Misusing His Name", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.904, + 246.078 + ], + [ + 528.6193237304688, + 246.078 + ], + [ + 528.6193237304688, + 293.06646728515625 + ], + [ + 68.904, + 293.06646728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Practice Guides for all major practice areas", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.492, + 70.476 + ], + [ + 266.046, + 70.476 + ], + [ + 266.046, + 110.74799999999999 + ], + [ + 85.492, + 110.74799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE AMLAW DAILY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.264, + 197.16499999999996 + ], + [ + 362.38399999999996, + 197.16499999999996 + ], + [ + 362.38399999999996, + 231.56400000000002 + ], + [ + 209.264, + 231.56400000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE AM LAW DAILY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.904, + 415.30499999999995 + ], + [ + 192.676, + 415.30499999999995 + ], + [ + 192.676, + 429.56800000000004 + ], + [ + 68.904, + 429.56800000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SURVEYS AND RANKINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.904, + 515.9849999999999 + ], + [ + 223.3, + 515.9849999999999 + ], + [ + 223.3, + 530.248 + ], + [ + 68.904, + 530.248 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MAGAZINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.904, + 687.141 + ], + [ + 138.446, + 687.141 + ], + [ + 138.446, + 700.5649999999999 + ], + [ + 68.904, + 700.5649999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Wor", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 574.715 + ], + [ + 123.772, + 574.715 + ], + [ + 123.772, + 589.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 589.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire Slaps Scott Rothstein With Suit", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 613.309 + ], + [ + 234.86181640625, + 613.309 + ], + [ + 234.86181640625, + 626.3659210205078 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 626.3659210205078 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW FIRM INC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 60.407999999999994 + ], + [ + 161.32786560058594, + 60.407999999999994 + ], + [ + 161.32786560058594, + 76.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 76.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Litiaation 2008", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 83.06099999999999 + ], + [ + 150.69384765625, + 83.06099999999999 + ], + [ + 150.69384765625, + 98.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 98.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FOCUS EUROPE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 104.875 + ], + [ + 166.0514373779297, + 104.875 + ], + [ + 166.0514373779297, + 120.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 120.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STUDENT EDITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 126.68899999999998 + ], + [ + 183.25892639160156, + 126.68899999999998 + ], + [ + 183.25892639160156, + 142.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 142.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 149.34199999999998 + ], + [ + 120.21244812011719, + 149.34199999999998 + ], + [ + 120.21244812011719, + 165.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 165.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Hall cf Fame", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 171.995 + ], + [ + 139.91424560546875, + 171.995 + ], + [ + 139.91424560546875, + 187.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 187.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INCISIVE MEDIA EVENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 192.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 222.1480712890625, + 192.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 222.1480712890625, + 209.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 209.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBSCRIBE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 215.62300000000002 + ], + [ + 141.26773071289062, + 215.62300000000002 + ], + [ + 141.26773071289062, + 231.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 231.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERTISE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 237.43699999999995 + ], + [ + 142.759765625, + 237.43699999999995 + ], + [ + 142.759765625, + 253.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 253.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ABOUT US", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 260.09 + ], + [ + 134.7197265625, + 260.09 + ], + [ + 134.7197265625, + 276.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 276.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEATURED SPONSORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 281.904 + ], + [ + 204.93714904785156, + 281.904 + ], + [ + 204.93714904785156, + 298.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 298.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW.COM NETWORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.266, + 429.56800000000004 + ], + [ + 199.79388427734375, + 429.56800000000004 + ], + [ + 199.79388427734375, + 445.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.266, + 445.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Comments (0\\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.542, + 359.52 + ], + [ + 119.7833480834961, + 359.52 + ], + [ + 119.7833480834961, + 372.24945068359375 + ], + [ + 69.542, + 372.24945068359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Resumes e< Peroussione", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.542, + 386.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 149.08290100097656, + 386.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 149.08290100097656, + 397.36944580078125 + ], + [ + 69.542, + 397.36944580078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cone ants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.542, + 404.04 + ], + [ + 116.0673828125, + 404.04 + ], + [ + 116.0673828125, + 415.74945068359375 + ], + [ + 69.542, + 415.74945068359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Post a comment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.542, + 441.0 + ], + [ + 134.17677307128906, + 441.0 + ], + [ + 134.17677307128906, + 452.49945068359375 + ], + [ + 69.542, + 452.49945068359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Make a comment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.542, + 341.88 + ], + [ + 129.08558654785156, + 341.88 + ], + [ + 129.08558654785156, + 353.12945556640625 + ], + [ + 69.542, + 353.12945556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3I\"SINESS INSIDER \n31WW Review", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.234, + 82.32000000000001 + ], + [ + 275.739013671875, + 82.32000000000001 + ], + [ + 275.739013671875, + 144.15179443359375 + ], + [ + 91.234, + 144.15179443359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire Sex Offender Sues Scott Rothstei \n$200 Million Settlement Offer", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.04400000000001, + 170.340576171875 + ], + [ + 587.8536376953125, + 170.340576171875 + ], + [ + 587.8536376953125, + 225.25408935546875 + ], + [ + 88.04400000000001, + 225.25408935546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O'EN Forum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.28200000000004, + 273.0 + ], + [ + 315.17199999999997, + 273.0 + ], + [ + 315.17199999999997, + 290.64 + ], + [ + 216.28200000000004, + 290.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Courthouse News Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.45000000000002, + 94.08 + ], + [ + 485.51800000000003, + 94.08 + ], + [ + 485.51800000000003, + 115.92 + ], + [ + 175.45000000000002, + 115.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Dizzying Claims Against Disbarred Attorney", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.98800000000003, + 144.48 + ], + [ + 329.846, + 144.48 + ], + [ + 329.846, + 154.56 + ], + [ + 207.98800000000003, + 154.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "Figure", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 63 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Figure", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 169 + ], + [ + "Line", + 79 + ], + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "Text", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 3 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759703" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be44fc210b1ce165b88e77066f02566f7db3f014 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a31fc778e1f871ab4640dff531290e2595f4619d4d448198c0d669e764e5a1e0 +size 13385 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_40.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_40.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72ccb409b18a5aa9bdb0f3b2b4ae25005663410b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_40.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c84b0168d0e5dd7d5d41dba233d06cc9fbbc30d7533de5feae81cf99cd58ea4 +size 14565 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_62.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_62.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ca44c8196bd437345790c2daab2bf5469b715c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_62.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:faf42dd48f256b1b51435aea3d84f1ea1a39d32dfc2314dd7e25fec235322354 +size 20589 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_65.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_65.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47ce110e64b638f895e327880ce2b436edc04d9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Figure_65.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e8015dbff7fcf1ea13636f59dc24d9963480c545f975570a842ea71b1d0ab7d3 +size 23231 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_41.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_41.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..272246ef9bf51d4207fc3451cf88262bd58a5a3a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_41.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fe4b53a4694f27f3208f2c3c3e4fe280c57c43992de2e98a18941ad97a83ca09 +size 5021 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_49.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_49.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..400ff032948ceb9613a9aa7041754d4d52409c90 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_49.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:71fd1afee4b024af6666eb55372e76e63ef75d8a979df8ea6a6521c6b4ddcc5c +size 4175 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_52.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_52.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..afbbaeb19301609e17ceed52aa414dd6f92464cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_52.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bc6621d14039c4e8b6f6081daad56e362f1aa6c0e324b69075f5f9c15f615601 +size 5256 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_67.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_67.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fef25f152f0b9e5b34ad3abc726da4870397b542 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_23_Picture_67.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:854529054d1a5874245aced317dd76b4a23e355ce15310e73528c02de42a6741 +size 3264 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_24_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_24_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..910ce707f1f143d3c943feb9440eadb285a931a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_24_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f7a2be2242eaa500e2799e74dea498108bdfadecd139a33e3bcc03f21cfd654c +size 15133 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_104.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_104.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bebb5263cdebe69787fa71f205fe1119aacfb729 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_104.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c40f8a4ab45923898fd803d8dfd8b9acaaebd0f22a85f255ef6ad62ca650873e +size 3448 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_81.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_81.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9fe973297d90738fbc474a0e1aced3ffd0900c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_27_Picture_81.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b5ebe8d035b2f4a6f7216f9852c89bcd2fe2971bb80a868e96e0c222855c157d +size 29414 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_34.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_34.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01bd415f49edb0c533eafc227d23b541d1cd84cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_34.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e808aa4e7661d2aff6ab93c16d7829d71d4d6b77e70454c963cb1362c2ea8cbb +size 41910 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_36.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_36.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3b7e4b1b3ac4a70391ad1c6b97ec40e18e37008 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_36.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b3e21e56d17f45525578709b17445676195a87b199bc2a73b3ed915b3bacefc1 +size 33687 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_52.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_52.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e2202cc9b7a0c0532387d8d06c14302a3483369 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_28_Figure_52.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e983cde57d93b8985215d89e2c9a9aa5828fad6fab2bb61324ab5fe84057131f +size 27351 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd3e939e68958e4776fae3fbe360d47fd92808bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:01c42845608f3dcac5e7f08f9b3183bf29067ecdcc88ac9ff2541135315931ee +size 3571 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2db10fe4678d017c112c8f8c8eaa2455440ca4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:efeef857b862bb431d8ecfb6a4bea409f8860eff7d35a6a41a4451549b9fe888 +size 8343 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..112074cc5f45543c38d750ae5afd1c51f3f03a1d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_29_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b8e2828c0d070c0109e5a15165acf9b5fc5759db0168579428a567d0f4681105 +size 68607 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81eb129d9d52bc31bc26146148d396a9b8e9f136 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cae10dd3a9054fe0e5075f337dd59e663cdaddf4c2c7130f136aee326aa7bfcc +size 16830 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c95e0793a8be5966dda3fbe05aec2624bd02e9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50d96740c5c734d726616d1f584a5f7601a5358e971155ae6dad941ab9b064df +size 13089 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6361a6f02b5f3de526a1a9b74fcd5430e23ff4fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a51d09b5c7dada5c23af6abc27fc70242b4150f7ba77a9d4bfe89a48055708d8 +size 6123 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..351073b1ff94cc5f8ae394a0e854afe8fc2d362d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7aacfa9ca0b0869a9cb6fb6b3de4762fd0ea425394646223aab66aaff8923b19 +size 92548 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36f4113c302024cba86d78a799b8430766b7e73d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_32_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:07f3e59792fb2ead761ffed5f383cb7bf25dc6103f8e17ddda18db9aed0eecad +size 15899 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_35_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_35_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9982c840def9e0d89bcedbc02baf979ec4ef2c6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_35_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c95f7ed710d8d90b5d77ad855841481e949f70c8fa899cee78011ec66e31b126 +size 16728 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_36_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_36_Picture_22.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ba54fa0c5146305dab521199346b97584f50623 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_36_Picture_22.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac19ac0faffb0b92a1c52178f43b99162247a2018030a6203a13e843b5b466f8 +size 7445 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_37_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_37_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffad6144b427d02a5af8167e06e8b9fe5294d3ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_37_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:653366c502a2d1b1b0c92e3d8513a98ac727928dc794af31435b2a5f5be7b8fc +size 5659 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_25.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_25.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0365a907377d42a078dcba5e7a3ab6079ba204d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_25.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a23958c85f72d415d8559e8e6636d14ccfe490d7248c2cf480fde00afea52a11 +size 8884 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_36.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_36.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f79747276200107bf0fd4e5e5114d9581d744be --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_39_Picture_36.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:de8c305134faf61eb7af6d198447b28d454dfd8b8dc7ca47e790b36d85621a4e +size 7050 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_40_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_40_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efc3956fb8c1217574b090f386f87925b94e1b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_40_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ad33adbf1d089e5b2992dedb3cc660e63788111ea143aecc99706accb32a122d +size 2715 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12f04801d13d074bcd4009185dd0bac056c0cecc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c6bcf8d125d8c1a1287a6a7cd9ad1104bcdee35115c148299dcd4ba25cda0f74 +size 1798 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3667367a7fab7076ffef86dd31754a6fb628176 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:63fe6e7832cfdd115e8a2ad55e82d0409a41408852c1a91bc811cf399f30aea7 +size 2902 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb0f5f896b2d99028f344428e05516435d79cdff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:78de4a23f9a8cde4d896e549c0bdb6ac7681a90333bed816d901ab5ae914a8e7 +size 3205 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3e730882c8996969e87cf1c8939c19607ae265e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_41_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8efd5c758c1c7df5dc2f37a087781bd0f7ab2f022fdcf178d66d1760b033cc34 +size 78220 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_36.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_36.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a877499453fed51fa5685b258a0dbfa2028ee36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_36.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4ac2f18773d1c849e3a5bc61cc0c91868081839ca8d392e7968d0527286558e7 +size 23534 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_37.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_37.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53408f1ac09dcd61c90150f85d94e638cd1255b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_42_Picture_37.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:128fefd5946b7f88d3497e97a64649fca93d5c02156380d0ae726986856a8e85 +size 4170 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_31.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_31.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fe19f9a071fff08c02d4f0ce7994cd97189655d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_31.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0cad5274cdfe7cc19ea55196ccf48df7050cc3920b2275a9fc97fe872a696a4c +size 4557 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_34.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_34.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e868abdfd45692b6fb23e3f318d27b388c0e90f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759703/_page_43_Picture_34.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ff538c45bb7a63ad5e699e694b5f5f600bd0ae27db991f6d35f6809db65b4493 +size 4616 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbc92a30a86bba3faee46aaafcc5da92cd944113 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +FILED + +10 MAY 27 PM 4:16 + +**EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, +submits his response to the March 18, 2010 Request to Produce served by Defendant, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("Edwards"), and states: + +1. 1. All documents upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + 1. a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whose services are alleged as an element of damages; + 2. b. All invoices for attorney services and costs alleged as an element of damages; + 3. c. All time records reflecting services rendered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + 4. d. Every cancelled check, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kid or description reflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every + +expenditure by you or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + +# RESPONSE: + +Objection: this request seeks documents and information protected by the attorney/client privilege and work product privilege, as well as documents that are irrelevant and/or duplicative of other requests. As to subsections (a) alit1 Epstein objects as the information is confidential and protected by attorn yprivilege, and also asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege. However, f5g/e 0 ill be producing invoices in redacted form which contain substantially th elTiformation requested in subsections (a) and (d). In addition, subsection y burdensome as it would require Epstein to cull through thousands of documents to determine which, if any, documents are responsive. Epstein also asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth dments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an v inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and w herefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment p ge against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth ent's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "Lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."). Without waiving the foregoing objections, Epstein will produce responsive + +documents in redacted form pursuant to the Agreed Order entered on May 21, 2010. The undersigned will produce additional documents the week of May 31, 2010. + +2. Any and all prescriptions for past five (5) years. correctives lenses issued to you within the + +## RESPONSE: + +Documents responsive to this request have already been produced to Edwards. + +### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true cou\_of the foregoing Was Sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on thisignlay of May + +, Jr., Esq , Jaffe, Weissing, & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort 1.auderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L. M. Fistos + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Sh'p:ey, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Wes: Palm Beach, FL 33409 586-5300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant ACcia..1 Barnhart & + +Jack AlanGoldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 Altai Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 ,s8N61-835-8691 C Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +> Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 745-5849 (954) 745-3556 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Bo vard, Suite 400 West Palm B cti'i FL 33401 (561) 842-0 (561) 20004 Fax 4 ; + +By 1 : \_' 12 0-44(E Critton, Jr. lf,...) Florida Bar #224162 d' Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 + +(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae8eea6e6b71ab94ad3d99b3222ac97d212f2a9c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748/EFTA02759748.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759748.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4426, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.0, + 85.57799999999999 + ], + [ + 559.5260000000001, + 85.57799999999999 + ], + [ + 559.5260000000001, + 128.367 + ], + [ + 319.0, + 128.367 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.36, + 333.92199999999997 + ], + [ + 510.40000000000003, + 333.92199999999997 + ], + [ + 510.40000000000003, + 349.86299999999994 + ], + [ + 140.36, + 349.86299999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.772, + 140.952 + ], + [ + 198.41800000000003, + 140.952 + ], + [ + 198.41800000000003, + 156.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 123.772, + 156.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.94400000000002, + 194.416 + ], + [ + 193.952, + 194.416 + ], + [ + 193.952, + 209.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 119.94400000000002, + 209.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.39, + 249.724 + ], + [ + 384.025390625, + 249.724 + ], + [ + 384.025390625, + 264.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 258.39, + 264.79998779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759748" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad5e0670a11bac1aa77fc718e8338473d0cc365b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120** + +**Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +**Plaintiff,** +**v.** + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN** individually, +**[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED],** +**individually, and L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +2010 JUN-1 PM 1:41 +STARON R. BOCK, CLERK +BALTIMORE CIRCUIT CIVIL S + +**ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO POSTPONE THE JUNE 4, 2010 HEARING ON +ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Epstein's Motion To Postpone the June 4, 2010 Hearing on Rothstein's Motion to Set Aside Default, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Motion is hereby granted/ denied +The Motion is continued until +The Defendant Rothstein is made award S/e +for disposal + +DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 2 day of June, 2010. + +![]()Copied furnished to: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, MARC S. NURIK, ESQ., Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQ., [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e263cc78cd6028e415ee9b15b2894935046fed7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751/EFTA02759751.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759751.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1748, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.114, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.68100000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.68100000000004, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 264.114, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO POSTPONE THE JUNE 4, 2010 HEARING ON ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.566, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 536.6700000000001, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 536.6700000000001, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 73.566, + 317.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759751" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c92156bb78b9025318596c6fb514eda06691cffa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.md @@ -0,0 +1,2731 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. EUCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEALS +2010 JUL - 3 PM 4: 5- + +FILED + +**EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION PURSUANT +TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, submits his first supplemental response to the March 18, 2010 Request to Produce served by Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]"), and states: + +1. All documents upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + +a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whose services are alleged as an element of damages; + +b. All invoices for attorney services and costs alleged as an element of damages; + +c. All time records reflecting services rendered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + +d. Every cancelled check, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kid or description reflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every + +expenditure by you or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + +# RESPONSE: + +Objection: this request seeks documents and information protected by the attorney/client privilege and work product privilege, as well as documents that are irrelevant and/or duplicative of other requests. As to subsections (a) and (d), Epstein objects as the information is confidential and protected by attorney/client privilege, and also asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege. However, Epstein will be producing invoices in redacted form which contain substantially the same information requested in subsections (a) and (d). In addition, subsection (d) is unduly burdensome as it would require Epstein to cull through thousands of documents to determine which, if any, documents are responsive. Epstein also asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)- Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."). Without waiving the foregoing objections, Epstein will produce responsive + +documents in redacted form pursuant to the Agreed Order entered on May 21, 2010. The undersigned will produce additional documents the week of May 31, 2010. See attached. + +2. Any and all prescriptions for correctives lenses issued to you within the past five (5) years. + +**RESPONSE:** + +Documents responsive to this request have already been produced to [REDACTED] + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 3 day of June, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Counsel to Scott Rothstein +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boulr ard, Suite 400 + +West Palm B ac FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2 + +(561) 253-0 + +By: + +Robe r I itton, Jr. + +Florida Bar 24162 + +Michael J. Pik Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey + +#### LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, UP 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 + +May 17, 2010 + +![](_page_4_Picture_2.jpeg) + +Matter ID: 2008-029 + +Client ID: 3371 + +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +# TRANSACTION DETAIL + +Alas" Federal= + +01/02/2009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/052009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/05/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +i%c + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +01/06/2009 + +01/06/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01107/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/07/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 RHB Legal research re: RIC conference with RISC demon, legislative history and purpose; 160 hr 5480.00 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/08/2009 + +01/09/2009 + +01/09/2009 + +01/09/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +01112(2009 RHB Review case and Statutory Law on RICO claim + +01/12/2009 + +01/12/2009 + +01/12(2009 + +01/12(2009 + +01/13/2009 + +01/13/2009 + +01/13/2009 + +01/13/2009 RI-IB Finalize Motion to Dismiss and Strike Arne + +E.W. t-Count IV, L. M. and 2.40 hr \$720.00 + +01/13/2009 + +01/13/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/14/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/15/2009 + +01/16/2009 + +1.10hr \$330.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +01/19/2009 01/19/2009 RDC Review Rico cases 01/19/2009 01/19/2009 01/19/2009 Asic 01/19/2009 01/19/2009 01/20/2009 O ACt" 01/20/2009 01/20/2009 RDC I dwar s January 16 letter regarding FBI statement 01/21/2009 RHB Review Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum regarding se; compare with Jane Doe Duces Tecum 01/21/2009 RI-1B Conference with RDC regarding Motion to Stay, Motion'fo Quash E.W. Duces Tecum and Discovery (Doe 2-5) 01/21/2009 RHB Draft Motion to Quash E.W. Duces Tecum 01/21/2009 RI-113 Review prior Answers and Respo toPis COvery in E.W 01/21/200g RHB Draft memo to RDC regarding ion to Quash Duces Tecum; prior discovery 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/22/2009 01/23/2009 01/23/2009 01/23/2009 0.301w \$150.00 0.20hr \$100.00 0.40hr \$120.00 0.25 hr \$75.00 1.60 hr \$480.00 0.50 hr \$150.00 0.10hr \$30.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +0123 /2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +CO ( S r 'S \*) 01/26/2009 C RDC Review letter re:Tatum; FBI; e-mails and response 0.401w \$200.00 ROC Telephone conference withilire: Subpoena Duces Tecum; Brad; left statement and depo + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/23/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/26/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +0.501w \$250.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +01/27/2009 + +01/27/2009 + +01/28/2009 + +01/28/2009 + +01/28/2009 + +01/28/2009 + +01/28/2009 RDC Receipt and review (Doe 2-7, BB, LM, EW) Responses to Interroga Request to Produce on individual cases 1.20 hr \$600.00 + +01/28/2009 + +01/28/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/2912009 CiS CA)CLe + +01/29/2009 + +01/29/2009 + +01/292009 + +01/3012009 + +01/30/2009 + +01/30/2009 + +01/30/2009 + +01/30/2009 + +01/30/2009 + +02/02/2009 + +02/02/2009 + +02/02/2009 + +02/02/2009 + +Federal ID + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +02/02/2009 + +02/02/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/03/2009 + +02/04/2009 + +02/04/2009 + +02/04/2009 + +02/04(2009 0.40 hr \$50.00 + +02/04/2009 MJP Confer with efldnyk regarding RICO claims 0.20hr \$60.00 + +02/04/2009 + +02/04/2009 + +02/04/2009 + +02/05/2009 + +02/05/2009 + +02/05/2009 + +02/05/2009 + +02/06/2009 + +02/06/2009 + +02/06/2009 MJP Research regarding RICO and no recovery for personal injury type matters 3.70hr \$1,110.00 + +02/07/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +02/09/2009 + +02/09/2009 + +02/09/2009 + +02/09/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 MJP. Research regarding RICO and meetings with R. Critton, Esq., + +02/10/2009 + +review legislative notes Qend 2.50 hr \$750.00 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 RDC Review RICO with Pike a 0.50 hi \$250.00 + +02/10/2009 + +02/10/2009 + +02/102009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/11/2009 + +02/12/2009 + +02/12/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/18/2009 + +02/19/2009 + +02/19/2009 + +02/19/2009 RDC Conference with JMB; review RICO case 1.10hr \$550.00 + +02/19/2009 + +02/19/2009 02/19/2009 WP Meetings with R. Critton, Esq., regaim R and eirisarch regarding RICO 1.50hr \$450.00 + +02/19/2009 + +02/19/2009 + +02r20/2009 + +02/19/2009 + +02/19/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +t + +02/20/2009 + +e l + +02/20/2009 t + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +02/20/2009 + +Federal ID + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +| 02/22/2009 | RHB | Legal research re: reply to Plaintiff's response to Motion to Dismiss Count IV-L.M. | | | +|------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +| 02/23/2009 | RDC | Telephone conference witN antallv Mh and Stio:e etc. | | | +| 02/23/2009 | RHB | Draft reply to L.M. and E.W. | | | +| 02/23/2009 | RDC | Review and revise Reply t#Qgppe in EW & LM | | | +| 02/24/2009 | MOP | S f r.gt research regarding federal and state civil remedies and RICO; confer | | | +| 02/24/2009 | R | al research | | | +| | | 4 -4\IiS)A9 Ir Sro to tion to Dismiss Count IV (includes | | | +| | | | 0.90hr | \$270.00 | +| | | | 0.20hr | \$100.00 | +| | | | 3.50hr | \$1,050.00 | +| | | | 0.20hr | \$100.00 | +| | | | 1.30 hr | \$390.00 | +| | | | 1.80 hr | \$540.00 | + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +02/25/2009 + +02/25/2009 + +02/25/2009 + +0 2/26/2009 + +02/25/2009 + +02/25/2009 + +02/26/2009 + +02/26/2009 + +02/26(2009 + +CO + +02/26/2009 + +02/26/2009 + +1C).ACP. + +02/26/2009 + +( + +0 /2009 2/27 + +Se + +02/26/2009 + +02/27/2009 + +02/27/2009 + +02/27/2009 + +C' + +SACCLe + +02/27/2009 ) + +02/27/2009 + +02/27/2009 + +03/01/2009 + +YYY + +03/02/2009 + +03/02/2009 + +03/02/2009 + +03/02/2009 + +03/02/2009 + +03/02/2009 + +03/03/2009 MJP Meeting with R. Budnyk regarding RICO 0.30 hr \$90.00 + +03/03/2009 + +03/03/2009 + +03/03/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +O 'S 03/05/2009 ( S 1 C" CA)CLe C &I 03/05/2009 \'-'- + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/05/2009 + +03/06/2009 + +03/06/2009 RDC Finish prep for hearing on RICO; e-mails and conference regarding LM & EW 2.80hr \$1,400.00 + +03/06/2009 + +03/06/2009 + +03/06/2009 + +03/06/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/09/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 RDC Review AC and EW motions/responses 0.50 hr \$250.00 03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009 + +03/10/2009÷ + +03/11/2009 + +03/11/2009 + +03/11/2009 + +03/11/2009 + +03/11/2009 + +03/11/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/12/2009 + +03/13/2009 + +03/13/2009 + +03/13/2009 RDC Order re' 03/13/2009 gia 03/15/2009 MJP Weekend strategy meeting with R. Critton, Esq., regarding discovery, Motions to 2.00 hr \$600.00 Transfer, 5th Amendment and getting up to speed with files 03/15/2009 MJP Review and analysis of EW's Motion to Quash 0.40 hr \$120.00 er; reviewed transcript A Cos WWI St + +03/15/2009 + +03/15/2009 + +03/15/2009 + +03/16/2009 + +03/16/2009 + +03/16/2009 + +0.20 hr \$100.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/16/2009 SISSIES + +03/16/2009 SONIs + +03/16/2009 RHB Legal research re: 5th Amended indentification of witnesses + +03/16/2009 + +03/16/2009 RHB Conference(s) with Attorney Pike re: Motion to Transfer Issues; 5th Amended Issues, background + +03/16/2009 + +03/16/2009 + +03/162009 + +03/16/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 + +03/17/2009 L + +03/18/2009 WP Review and analysis of Fifth Amendment Priviledge Information + +03/18/2009 + +a Wile + +0.76 hr \$225.00 + +0.25 hr \$75.00 + +0.90 hr \$270.00 + +011111 + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/18/2009 + +03/18/2009 + +03/18/2009 + +03/18/2009 + +03/18/2009 + +03/18/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/19/2009 + +03/20/2009 + +03/20/2009 I + +03/20/2009 I + +03/20/2009 MJP + +03/20/2009 + +03/20/2009 + +inalize re endmen + +Go + +2.80 hr S840.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/20/2009 + +03/20/2009 + +03/20/2009 ilia + +03/22/2009 + +03/22/2009 + +03/23/2009 MJP Meeting with R. Budnyk, Esq., regarding the 5th Amendment 0.30 hr CO Iv + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +0323/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/23/2009 + +03/24/2009 + +\$90.00 + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +| 03/26/2009 | MJP | [REDACTED] | Meeting with R. Critton, Esq., regarding personal injury and indirect injury type damages regarding Motion to Dismiss | 0.40 hr | \$120.00 | +|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------| +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | \$[REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | \$[REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | RDC | Receipt and review Doe (Fed) First Interrogatories; First Request to Produce; 1st Request for Admissions | 0.30 hr | \$150.00 | | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | \$2[REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | RHB | Conference with RDC, EW, and LM regarding Motions to Dismiss; SR/JD no private c/a | 0.20 hr | \$60.00 | | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/26/2009 | MJP | Draft/revise Motion for stay in Jane Doe, review discovery response in file regarding same, serve same | 0.40 hr | \$120.00 | | +| 03/26/2009 | MJP | Preparing for Motion to Dismiss Hearing on Jane Doe | 0.90 hr | \$270.00 | | +| 03/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/27/2009 | MJP | Research on Motion to Dismiss, confer with R. Critton, Esq., regarding same, research response in opposition | 5.30 hr | \$1,590.00 | | +| 03/27/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/27/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/27/2009 | RDC | Conference with Pike re: Rico issues | 0.70 hr | \$350.00 | | +| 03/28/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/29/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/29/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/29/2009 | MJP | Research and prepare for Motion to Dismiss, review and analysis of case law and RICO statement, review and analysis of RICO conspiracy | 1.90 hr | \$570.00 | | +| 03/30/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/30/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/30/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/30/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 03/30/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +| 03/30/2009 | MJP | Draft Notice of Supplemental Authority | 0.20 hr | \$60.00 | +|------------|-----|----------------------------------------|---------|---------| +| 03/30/2009 | | | | | + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +03/30/2009 + +| 03/31/2009 | RDC | Prepare for hearing; read Rico and motions/responses | 3.50 hr | \$1,750.00 | +|------------|-----|------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +| 03/31/2009 | | | | | + +03/31/2009 + +03/31/2009 + +| 03/31/2009 | MJP | Meeting with R. Critton, Esq., re: preparing for Motion to Dimiss (JD), drafting Motions to Compel Discovery responses (JD), review and analysis of plea agreement to determine if [REDACTED] | 2.40 hr | \$720.00 | +|------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|----------| +|------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|----------| + +| 04/01/2009 | RDC | Continued preparation for hearing | 3.00 hr | \$1,500.00 | +|------------|-----|-----------------------------------|---------|------------| +|------------|-----|-----------------------------------|---------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | RDC | Hearing with Marra; conference with Brad; conference with Jack | 2.10 hr | \$1,050.00 | +|------------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +|------------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | MJP | Prepare for and attend hearing on Motion to Dimiss, finalize case law and research cases excluding personal injury damages under RICO | 4.20 hr | \$1,260.00 | +|------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +|------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| + +| 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| + +[REDACTED] + +Federal ID [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +--- + +04/01/2009 + +04/01/2009 + +04/01/2009 + +04/01/2009 + +04/01/2009 + +04/01/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/02/2009 + +04/03/2009 + +04/03/2009 + +04/03/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +04/09/2009 + +04/09/2009 + +04/09/2009 + +04/0912009 + +04/09/2009 + +04/09/2009 + +04/09/2009 MJP Confer regarding supplement to RICO Motion to Dism' + +04/09/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/10/2009 + +04/12/2009 + +04/12/2009 + +04/12/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +same 0.30 hr \$90.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 + +04/13/2009 \_ Review and analysis of Doe% Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay + +04/14/2009 RDC + +04/14/2009 MIMI + +04/14/2009 ROC + +04/14/2009 + +04/14/2009 + +04/14/2009 + +04/14/2009 + +04/142009 + +04/142009 + +Conference with Rita re: Response to Quash in S.R. + +Response to Stay + +Sas alla + +0.30 hr \$90.00 + +0.30hr \$150.00 + +0.10hr \$50.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +04/15/2009 SNIP 04/15/2009 RHB Legal research regarding case law in Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Qua 04/15/2009 RHB EW - Draft Reply to Response to Motion to Quash C O 04/16/2009 RDC Revision to Rita's reply to EWs M S :1 adoCLiarrison material; conference with Rita OS \*) 04/16/2009 + +S MS 11111 + +04/15/2009 + +04/15/2009 + +04/15/2009 + +04/15/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/1612009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/162009 + +04/16/2009 + +04/16/2009 + +1.10hr \$330.00 + +NS + +2.30hr \$690.00 + +0.60hr \$300.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 RHB Review House bills/reports and history on 18 USC Statute 2255; 1.50 hr 5450.00 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +04/22/2009 + +AS C) ^ ` C 'S -wr il litir + +04/23/2009 + +04/23/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/23/2009 + +04/23/2009 + +04/23/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +04/24/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 (SI + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12f2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/122009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/12/2009 + +05/1312009 + +Matter ID: 2008-029 + +Federal ID + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +Co S + +05/11/2009 MJP Confer with R. Budnyk regarding 2255 0.20 hr 560.00 + +05/122009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/08/2009 + +05/09/2009 + +05/10/2009 t ame-- + +05/10/2009 MJP Review and analysis of CMA and Jane Does Res~risps position to Motion 0.60hr \$180.00 for Stay + +05/10/2009 + +05/11/2009 \ + +05/11/2009 + +4 + +C 'S \*) \_ + +05/11/2009 + +05/112009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +05/11/2009 + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +05/13/2009 + +05/13/2009 MJP 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 O 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 O 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/14/2009 05/14/2009 05/14/2009 1.50 hr \$450.00 + +A Finalize Replies to Stay Opposition in Jane Doe aria CMA + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +05/22/2009 + +05/22/2009 + +05/22/2009 + +05/222009 + +05/22/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/242009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/24/2009 + +05/25/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 05/26/2009 + +05/26/2009 + +A lephone conference with B. regarding Subpoenas 0.20 hr \$60.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +05129/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/29/2009 + +05/30/2009 + +05/31/2009 + +05/31/2009 + +05/31/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +06/01/2009 + +#4 9 + +( S ? + +C + +CS S tar + +RDC E-malls, memo toSetc. re: NPA, 2255; review NPA + +\_ . + +IMO MEIN + +1.10hr \$550.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 oS + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 C + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 + +06/10/2009 + +"S 9 + +06/10/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +? St e + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +CCL + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 S + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 +O (Sr 17liar + +06/112009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 WP Drafting Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Jane Doe (SR) Amended Complaint, research 11.30hr 33,390.00 and analysis of case law re: same, meeting with R. Critton, re: same, research and analysis of enterprise theory, common purpose under RICO and personal injury damages not awarded under RICO + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +06/11/2009 + +06/11/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +06/12/2009 + +04 + +06/12/2009 WP Finalize Epstein's Motion to Doe (SR) Amended Complaint, telephone conference with B. + +06/14/2009 + +06/15/2009 + +06/15/2009 + +7.40hr \$2,220.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +06/29/2009 a + +06/29/2009 IOW + +06/29/2009 DY + +06/29/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 . + +06/30/2009 . + +06/30/2009 . + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +06/30/2009 + +s Injunction, Receiver and Bond • • • • • CO + +Perform research on fraudulent transfer issues for response to Motion for Aiity2.10hr + +Federal ID1 1 + +# For Professional Services Rendered: + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07101/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/01/2009 + +07/02/2009 + +07/02/2009 + +07/02/2009 D`1 + +A Cos + +Continue research re Epstein's Response to Injunction Motion - injunction, fraudulent transfer, receiver, accounting, bond (Jane Doe) + +07/022009 + +07/02/2009 + +07/0212009 =MI el 2 + +07/02/2009 S + +2.50 hr 5625.00 + +intism SS a MID + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +07/02/2009 I 07/02/2009 I + +07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 + +07/02/2009 + +07/02/2009 07/02/2009 + +07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/03/2009 07/04/2009 DY 07/05/2009 RDC 07/062009 DY + +07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009 + +\ + +Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Injunction Motion Research elements of injunction and hearsay Review e-mails Research elements of accounting and hearsay; prepare Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Injunction Motion; review and revise Memorandum of Law (Jane Doe) + +140 hr \$850.00 0.10hr \$50.00 8.60 hr \$2,150.00 + +Federal ID + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 "OpA + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 AS CA) ) + +07/06/2009 S' + +07/06/2009 + +07/06/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 DY "N~RaKiew and revi o of Law in Opposition to Injunction Motion; telephone 4.60 hr \$1,150.00 r \_ \_ sgthiance with Reeder to revisions o Memo of ; review e-mail from Reeder (Jane Doe) + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +07/07/2009 + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +07/10/2009 + +07/10/2009 + +07/10/2009 + +07/10/2009 + +07/10/2009 + +07/10/2009 DY + +07/10/2009 + +07/12/2009 + +07/12/2009 + +07/12/2009 + +07/12/2009 + +07/12/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +Review and revise Memora f Law in Opposition to Injuncti otio , lew 3.50hr \$0.00 and respond to e-mail from Reeder re: revised memoranda prepare final draft of Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Injunction Mot JanenDoe) + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +--- + +![](_page_40_Picture_135.jpeg) + +07/13/2009 DY Review and revise Memo of Law in Opposition to Injunction Motion; prepare final version of Memo of Law 0.50 hr \$125.00 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/13/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +07/14/2009 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +--- + +| 07/22/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------| +| 07/22/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 07/22/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 07/23/2009 | MJP | Confer with D. Yarema regarding networth discovery | 0.20 hr | \$60.00 | | +| 07/23/2009 | | | | | | + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +07/23/2009 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 I + +07/24/2009 I + +07/24/2009 1 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 + +07/24/2009 DY + +07/26/2009 + +07/27/2009 + +07/27/2009 + +S + +A Cos + +Review and antittePlaintiffs Reply to Injunction Motion; review and compare Response to Injunction Motion: review cases cited in Response and Reply (Jane Doe) + +2.40 hr \$600.00 + +a an + +MS a + +07/27/2009 WP Research and analysis of ca I re ing preemotion of state law by federal law in connection with RICO ane Doe), research regarding legislative intent under RICO. meeting with R. Cri on, Esq., re: same. + +4.40 hr \$1,320.00 + +07/27/2009 + +07/27/2009 + +07/27/2009 + +Federal 1D + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +| 07/27/2009 | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------| +| 07/27/2009 a | | +| 07/27/2009 DY Office conference with | | +| 0727/2009 WP Drafting Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss in Jane Doe, research regarding | | +| 07/28/2009 MJP Research and | | +| 07/28/2009 ea | | +| 07/28/2009 OS | | +| 0.30 hr | \$3.00 | +| 2.20 hr 07/27/2009 a | \$1,100.00 | +| 1.20 hr | \$600.00 | +| 1.20hr 07/27/2009 | \$600.00 | +| 0.30 hr 07/27/2009 Me | \$150.00 | +| 0.50 hr 07/27/2009 alle | \$250.00 | +| 0.70 hr 07/27/2009 IMP RIC04;;;) | \$350.00 | +| 0.50 hr a 07/27/2009 | \$125.00 | +| 1.20 hr Same 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/2=009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 07/28/2009 | \$360.00 | +| 6.70hr side federal acts and statutes, drafting Reply to Opposition to statutes along toRICO research, meeting with M. Burman, Esq., Motion to on Rico, research re: legislative history, telephone regardin - AU relating to Jane Doe (SR) conference wi | \$2,010.00 | +| a | Ma a | +| OS 07/29/2009 | Ma | +| a 07/29/2009 | MD | + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +08/04/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 I + +08/05/2009 I + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 DY + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +08/05/2009 + +( S r + +C 'S \*) + +Prepare Response in Opposition to M • pplement Injunction Motion with Recently-ObtairtedAffidavit of + +1.40 hr \$350.00 + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +--- + +08/24/2009 + +08/24/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 , + +08/25/2009 | + +08/25/2009 | + +08/25/2009 | + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +08/25/2009 + +| 08/25/2009 | MJP | Drafting Responses to New Worth Discovery, meeting with RDC and confer with [REDACTED] re: same, research regarding punitive damages and limitations for producing information | 7.40 hr | \$2,220.00 | +|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------| +| 08/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 08/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 08/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 08/26/2009 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +10/01/2009 + +10/01/2009 CO + +10/01/2009 + +10/01/2009 + +<) 10/01/2009 + +10/01/2009 + +10/01/2009 SC) + +A + +10/01/2009 I + +10/01/2009 + +10/01/2009 + +10/02/2009 6 \*) + +10/02/2009 + +10/02/2009 + +10/02/2009 + +10/02/2009 + +10/02/2009 + +O + +10/02/2009 MJP Jane Doe - Review and analysis of Motion to Compel Interrogatories, Request for 9.10 hr \$2,730.00 Production and Requests for Admissions relative to Epstein's objections under the 5th. 6th and 14th Amendments, review and analysis of case law cited therein, update 5th Amendment research, begin drafting Response in Opposition to Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Requests for Production + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +10/03/2009 + +10/03/2009 + +10/03/2009 + +10/03/2009 + +10/04/2009 + +10/04/2009 + +10/04/2009 MJP + +Jane Doe - continue Response in Opposition to Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Requests for Production, research 5th Amendment issues, e-mails with [REDACTED], begin drafting Response in Opposition to Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Interrogatories + +5.80 hr \$1,740.00 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 MJP + +Jane Doe - continue Response in Opposition to Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Interrogatories, research 5th Amendment issues relative to requests for admissions, e-mails with [REDACTED], confer with [REDACTED], begin drafting Response in Opposition to Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Requests for Admissions + +9.60 hr \$2,880.00 + +10/05/2009 + +10/05/2009 + +10/06/2009 + +10/06/2009 + +10/06/2009 DY + +Attend deposition of Larry Eugene [REDACTED] + +3.10 hr \$775.00 + +10/06/2009 + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +10/06/2009 MJP Finalize All Responses in Oppo ' to M9tlons to Compel Requests for Production, Interrogatories a Ft for Admissions relative to all 5th ndment Issues, file same in Jane Doe (80893), conferences with," + +CA' C) + +6 +Si + +10/07/2009 + +10/07/2009 + +10/07/2009 + +10/07/2009 + +10/07/2009 + +8.10 hr \$2,430.00 + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +--- + +10/10/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 + +10/12/2009 RDC + +Prepare for and conference with David Rogers - LM + +2.30 hr + +\$1,150.00 + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 I + +10/12/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 RDC + +Attend Rogers depo - LM + +3.20 hr + +\$1,600.00 + +10/13/2009 + +[REDACTED] + +10/13/2009 + +[REDACTED] + +Federal ID + +## For Professional Services Rendered: + +10/13/20O9 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/13/2009 + +10/132009 + +A cos + +10/14/2009 RDC Prepare for and conference with Larry V - LM 1.50hr + +10/14/2009 + +10/14/2009 + +10/14/2009 + +10/142009 + +10/14/2009 + +10/14/2009 + +\$750.00 + +Federal ID + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +11/05/2009 + +11/05/2009 + +11/05/2009 DY + +11/05/2009 DY + +11/05/2009 + +11/05/2009 + +11/05/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/06/2009 + +11/07/2009 + +11/08/2009 + +O SA Doe) (Jane Doe) AS ) tr. + +Review Motion for Leave fy; Injunction Motion with N4covered , 3.10 hr \$775.00 Evidence - Deposition of Larry Visoski and prepare Motion to Strikesame (Jane. - + +Review Order denying Injunction Motion; office confere Critton re: Order 0.20 hr \$50.00 + +Federal ID + +#### For Professional Services Rendered: + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/09/2009 + +11/10/2009 MJ + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +11/10/2009 + +Go + +O + +UPI.? ...moo slit/. ..7./ esearch and analysis and update case law regarding abuse of process and RICO 1.90 hr \$570.00 (RRA Case) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e858b5333d6b0f12fd63651847b939500c7e281d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/EFTA02759752.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2910 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 53, + "chars": 51538, + "elapsed_seconds": 24.76, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_40_Picture_135.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.704, + 83.4 + ], + [ + 569.454, + 83.4 + ], + [ + 569.454, + 125.934 + ], + [ + 328.704, + 125.934 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.982, + 331.098 + ], + [ + 496.26599999999996, + 331.098 + ], + [ + 496.26599999999996, + 359.454 + ], + [ + 173.982, + 359.454 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.388, + 138.27800000000002 + ], + [ + 211.86, + 138.27800000000002 + ], + [ + 211.86, + 153.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 137.388, + 153.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.462, + 220.17600000000004 + ], + [ + 209.93400000000003, + 220.17600000000004 + ], + [ + 209.93400000000003, + 234.35400000000004 + ], + [ + 135.462, + 234.35400000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.492, + 274.386 + ], + [ + 396.756, + 274.386 + ], + [ + 396.756, + 289.39799999999997 + ], + [ + 273.492, + 289.39799999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF \nBURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, UP \n303 BANYAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 \nWEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.78600000000003, + 85.476 + ], + [ + 446.92462158203125, + 85.476 + ], + [ + 446.92462158203125, + 132.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 213.78600000000003, + 132.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSACTION DETAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 208.39263916015625 + ], + [ + 423.0085754394531, + 208.39263916015625 + ], + [ + 423.0085754394531, + 229.7034912109375 + ], + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 229.7034912109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 137.76 + ], + [ + 226.84906005859375, + 137.76 + ], + [ + 226.84906005859375, + 149.85113525390625 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 149.85113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 226.81607055664062, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 226.81607055664062, + 152.85113525390625 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 152.85113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.05199999999999, + 134.757 + ], + [ + 233.56607055664062, + 134.757 + ], + [ + 233.56607055664062, + 147.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 68.05199999999999, + 147.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.978, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 234.74740600585938, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 234.74740600585938, + 153.22113037109375 + ], + [ + 69.978, + 153.22113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 140.784 + ], + [ + 226.84906005859375, + 140.784 + ], + [ + 226.84906005859375, + 153.35399999999998 + ], + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 153.35399999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 139.108 + ], + [ + 229.81607055664062, + 139.108 + ], + [ + 229.81607055664062, + 152.72113037109375 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 152.72113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 227.54774475097656, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 227.54774475097656, + 151.35113525390625 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 151.35113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 226.44606018066406, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 226.44606018066406, + 150.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 150.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.05199999999999, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 232.81607055664062, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 232.81607055664062, + 151.72113037109375 + ], + [ + 68.05199999999999, + 151.72113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 138.27 + ], + [ + 227.167724609375, + 138.27 + ], + [ + 227.167724609375, + 150.00199999999998 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 150.00199999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 137.43200000000002 + ], + [ + 229.0477294921875, + 137.43200000000002 + ], + [ + 229.0477294921875, + 149.72113037109375 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 149.72113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.126, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 231.31607055664062, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 231.31607055664062, + 149.47113037109375 + ], + [ + 66.126, + 149.47113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 230.56607055664062, + 137.268 + ], + [ + 230.56607055664062, + 149.85113525390625 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 149.85113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.842, + 136.431 + ], + [ + 228.34906005859375, + 136.431 + ], + [ + 228.34906005859375, + 149.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 64.842, + 149.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.126, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 230.94606018066406, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 230.94606018066406, + 153.97113037109375 + ], + [ + 66.126, + 153.97113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.90400000000001, + 138.61 + ], + [ + 233.688, + 138.61 + ], + [ + 233.688, + 150.3 + ], + [ + 71.90400000000001, + 150.3 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.126, + 135.079 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 135.079 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 147.664 + ], + [ + 66.126, + 147.664 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 140.113 + ], + [ + 225.98399999999998, + 140.113 + ], + [ + 225.98399999999998, + 151.859 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 151.859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 227.56607055664062, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 227.56607055664062, + 151.2 + ], + [ + 62.916000000000004, + 151.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.274, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 227.60903930664062, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 227.60903930664062, + 151.72113037109375 + ], + [ + 62.274, + 151.72113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.842, + 139.108 + ], + [ + 228.31607055664062, + 139.108 + ], + [ + 228.31607055664062, + 151.98114013671875 + ], + [ + 64.842, + 151.98114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.842, + 139.44 + ], + [ + 228.72906494140625, + 139.44 + ], + [ + 228.72906494140625, + 152.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 64.842, + 152.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.274, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 226.85903930664062, + 138.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 226.85903930664062, + 152.09112548828125 + ], + [ + 62.274, + 152.09112548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 227.2290496826172, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 227.2290496826172, + 148.67999999999998 + ], + [ + 63.55800000000001, + 148.67999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.644, + 137.775 + ], + [ + 217.09906005859375, + 137.775 + ], + [ + 217.09906005859375, + 150.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 52.644, + 150.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.15, + 136.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 212.59906005859375, + 136.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 212.59906005859375, + 148.63 + ], + [ + 48.15, + 148.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.866, + 137.61 + ], + [ + 211.81607055664062, + 137.61 + ], + [ + 211.81607055664062, + 150.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 46.866, + 150.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.866, + 136.776 + ], + [ + 211.87738037109375, + 136.776 + ], + [ + 211.87738037109375, + 149.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 46.866, + 149.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.866, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 211.06607055664062, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 211.06607055664062, + 151.35113525390625 + ], + [ + 46.866, + 151.35113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.298, + 133.4547119140625 + ], + [ + 210.2491912841797, + 133.4547119140625 + ], + [ + 210.2491912841797, + 149.6529541015625 + ], + [ + 44.298, + 149.6529541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 215.2290496826172, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 215.2290496826172, + 150.98114013671875 + ], + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 150.98114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.718, + 136.431 + ], + [ + 216.03038024902344, + 136.431 + ], + [ + 216.03038024902344, + 149.85113525390625 + ], + [ + 50.718, + 149.85113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.792, + 140.28 + ], + [ + 210.576, + 140.28 + ], + [ + 210.576, + 151.97 + ], + [ + 48.792, + 151.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.792, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 210.576, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 210.576, + 154.008 + ], + [ + 48.792, + 154.008 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 214.81607055664062, + 140.616 + ], + [ + 214.81607055664062, + 153.22113037109375 + ], + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 153.22113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 139.946 + ], + [ + 216.31607055664062, + 139.946 + ], + [ + 216.31607055664062, + 152.72113037109375 + ], + [ + 51.36000000000001, + 152.72113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 56.495999999999995, + 142.29000000000002 + ], + [ + 220.47906494140625, + 142.29000000000002 + ], + [ + 220.47906494140625, + 155.10113525390625 + ], + [ + 56.495999999999995, + 155.10113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 53.286, + 138.942 + ], + [ + 215.71200000000002, + 138.942 + ], + [ + 215.71200000000002, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 53.286, + 150.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.57000000000001, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 139.77900000000002 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 151.497 + ], + [ + 54.57000000000001, + 151.497 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.644, + 135.594 + ], + [ + 218.22906494140625, + 135.594 + ], + [ + 218.22906494140625, + 149.84112548828125 + ], + [ + 52.644, + 149.84112548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.644, + 136.776 + ], + [ + 217.06607055664062, + 136.776 + ], + [ + 217.06607055664062, + 149.286 + ], + [ + 52.644, + 149.286 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Text", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Text", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Text", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Text", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 101 + ], + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759752" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_40_Picture_135.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_40_Picture_135.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16d25cbc769e7ffcd0b8cde5787762c8e642f520 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_40_Picture_135.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:290e5d73994e67a0b9f14f412748e6b85b607008b42275b32ec38648e6e7aba4 +size 9638 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_4_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_4_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e887bdae5ba1a10c498f7c8a5e2c6fd2df9fa6a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759752/_page_4_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:27a589e6d6e23dd4976a1269c86abaecacaa71a875bdfab16780f9748f6977f3 +size 3703 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0193ce110c028dca825cc376d50af24f43a9d94e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Plaintiff,** + +**Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +v. + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. EDWARDS, +individually, and L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**CONSENT** + +I, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby consent to the substitution of ██████████ ██████████ Burnett as my attorneys +and the withdrawal of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman. + +2010 JUN 11 PM 3:57 +JOHN R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**FILED** + +By: + +Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c73ff745b886dc016b1305e90af6e81a2af2ebe0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805/EFTA02759805.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759805.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 650, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.878, + 101.39799999999998 + ], + [ + 542.938, + 101.39799999999998 + ], + [ + 542.938, + 141.622 + ], + [ + 306.878, + 141.622 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONSENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.738, + 315.088 + ], + [ + 346.434, + 315.088 + ], + [ + 346.434, + 328.49600000000004 + ], + [ + 287.738, + 328.49600000000004 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759805" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49397f7b86dee7dd1e6854bedff48aed2a64ffef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PACH BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +2010 JUN 11 PM 3:57 + +FILED + +ORDER ON SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL + +Upon reading and filing of the foregoing Stipulation of Counsel, and the Court having been fully advised in the premises, it is thereupon + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: + +1. That Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire, and the law offices of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman is hereby authorized to withdraw as counsel of record for the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. + +2. That Lilly Ann ██████, Esquire, of the law offices of ██████ ██████ Burnett, P.A. is hereby authorized to appear on behalf of Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. + +DONE and ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 10th day of June, 2010. + +David F. + +Circuit Judge + +Copies furnished to: + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Gary M. ██████, Jr., Esq., ██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fisto & Lehrman, PL, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West + +Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Lilly Ann [REDACTED] Esq., [REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq., [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq., Rodney J. Janis, Esq., [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A., [REDACTED] Point, West Tower, 777 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 901, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54ed6557bc1804834872d38776d1ca0dff5a5291 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806/EFTA02759806.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759806.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1893, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.444, + 81.83 + ], + [ + 495.72600000000006, + 81.83 + ], + [ + 495.72600000000006, + 136.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 279.444, + 136.10500000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.41800000000003, + 313.96 + ], + [ + 440.85799999999995, + 313.96 + ], + [ + 440.85799999999995, + 328.155 + ], + [ + 198.41800000000003, + 328.155 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759806" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2209a1307ff69fa7ed6c4677486ac583653e6134 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## STIPULATION AND SUBSTITUTION + +COME NOW, the undersigned attorneys and file of counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epste Esquire of the law offices of Critton, Jr., Esqui on of said int stipulation for substitution ve styled cause. Lilly Ann M, ETT, P.A. will be substituted for Robert + +DATED this day ofJpe, + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTI6 ftkOLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach 3340 (561) 842-2820 (561) 253-01 + +Robert . Critton, Jr. Flori Bar #224162 + +5 sgg s -II 'S,3,irnf., i--- O nocc; , :mecc a, z c) ,-- ",, c•R UNSEL `r' :col cft en, " rev` + +BURNETT, P.A. Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561 + +FBN 195677 E. Knight, FBN 607363 L. Ackerman, Jr., FBN 235954 Rodney J. Janis, FBN 647896 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7eb80fcb897ca0aac64c7cd937238f7eeb9befdf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808/EFTA02759808.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759808.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1071, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.878, + 85.98599999999999 + ], + [ + 558.25, + 85.98599999999999 + ], + [ + 558.25, + 130.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 306.878, + 130.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STIPULATION AND SUBSTITUTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.554, + 313.59599999999995 + ], + [ + 456.17, + 313.59599999999995 + ], + [ + 456.17, + 328.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 180.554, + 328.99249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759808" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1d348c43e8e38ce54ca9dc4911e40bffc130bfe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.md @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +o IL EFEINDAI VIOTION TO COMPEL'. 2 14/ / COMPLETE RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE • '2 =, + +' • co° C ) rt t + +Defendant J. this Honorable Court for entry of an O Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, to fully res gh his undersigned attorneys, moves overi6ling discovery objections and compelling endant's Request for Production, and states: + +- I. On March 18, 201 of dant served by a Request to Produce, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. +- 2. On 6 2010, Plaintiff served his Response to las Request to Produce, raising multiple prCiiNge and other objections. A copy of the Response is attached as Exhibit B. Plaintiff aritcpffiduced documents that were almost entirely redacted. +- 3. On June 3, 2010, Plaintiff served a Supplemental Production Pursuant to Defendant's Request for Production, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C. The supplemental production was, again, almost entirely redacted. + - 4. Plaintiff's objections, and the redactions, are not well-founded. + +5. Movant's counsel certifies that a bona fide effort to agree or to narrow the issues raised by this motion has been made with opposing counsel or will be made before any hearing on the motion. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant J. moves for an OrdiStA'mtig all objections and requiring Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, to comply with the R Produce by making HI production of all responsive documents, awarding the fees' and costs incurred in bringing this motion, and providing such other relief as the Court may deem proper under the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attach f 6 foregoing has been furnished by day of June, 2010. + +Jas' Scaro a + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al Case No.: 502009CA040800)OCaMBAG Motion to Compel Complete Response to Request to Produce + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldbergen@agwpa.com; smahoney(4)agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Lehnnan, PL , Jaffe, Weissing, ME, Fistos & Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)424-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Burnett, P.A. 777 S Hagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)402-9044 Fax: (561)402-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey stein + +c + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices Nurik One E B ., Suite 700 Fort Lauder FL 33301 Phone: (954)-7.5-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040.300XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A Co's + +# REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff J. by and through the undersigned counsel, request, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit to inspect antfOoPy\_ ch of the following documents\*: + +\*"Documents" shall include, but' be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the req "Documents" metada directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. elude all electronic data as well as application metadata and system inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty (30) days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +- 1. All documents\* upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + - a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whose Cs alleged as an element of damages; + - b. All invoices for attorney services and cyleged as an element of damages; + - c. All time records reflecting seryfCes , the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + - d. Every cance u receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kind or desc ecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every expenditure by or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + - 2. an 11 prescriptions for corrective lenses issued to you within the past five +- (5) Years. 0 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this Mil- day of March 2010. + +\/' + +a + +ar No.: 169440 y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Ship 39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorne for Defendant/Co cb) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +=, Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, S Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-745-5849 Fax: 954745-3556 954-745-3556 Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, +submits his response to the March 18, 2010 Request to Produce served by Defendant, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]"), and states: + +1. All documents upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his +claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + +a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whose services are +alleged as an element of damages; + +b. All invoices for attorney services and costs alleged as an element +of damages; + +c. All time records reflecting services rendered, the payment for which +is alleged as an element of damages; + +d. Every cancelled check, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of +whatever kid or description reflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every + +expenditure by you or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + +# RESPONSE: + +Objection: this request seeks documents and information protected by the attorney/client privilege and work product privilege, as well as documents that are irrelevant and/or duplicative of other requests. As to subsections (a) and (d), Epstein objects as the information is confidential and protected by attorney/client privilege, and also asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege. However, Epstein will—be producing invoices in redacted form which contain substantially the same information requested in subsections (a) and (d). In addition, subsection (d) S unduly burdensome as it would require Epstein to cull through thousands of documents to determine which, if any, documents are responsive. Epstein also asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "(i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court?). Without waiving the foregoing objections, Epstein will produce responsive + +documents in redacted form pursuant to the Agreed Order entered on May 21, 2010. + +The undersigned will produce additional documents the week of May 31, 2010. + +2. Any and all prescriptions for correctives lenses issued to you within the past five (5) years. + +# RESPONSE: + +Documents responsive to this request have already been produced. + +# Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true cogtof the foregoing wa'js14/en ct )y fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on thislArtlay of May , 2010: + +, Jr., Esq Jaffe, Weissing, eL: rman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, L. M. , Fistos + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant- + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 o-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik & Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 745-5849 (954) 745-3556 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Bo -yard, Suite 400 West Palm B==ch FL 33401 (561) 842 (561) 2 + +By: fr D-94 e" obe i. Critton, Jr. Florida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, IWir J. , and .M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A Cos + +### EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, submits his first supplemental response to the March 18, 2010 Request to Produce served by Defendant, J. "), and states: + +- 1. All documents upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + - a. alleged as a ges; All agreernents with attorneys, the payment of whose services are element of damages; All invoices for attorney services and costs alleged as an element + - c. All time records reflecting services rendered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + - d. Every cancelled check, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kid or description reflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every + +expenditure by you or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + +# RESPONSE: + +Objection: this request seeks documents and information protected by the attorney/client privilege and work product privilege, as well as documents that are irrelevant and/or duplicative of other requests. As to subsections (a) and (d), Epstein objects as the information is confidential and protected by attorney/client privilege, and also asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege. However, Epstein will be producing invoices in redacted form which contain substantially the same Information requested in subsections (a) and (d). In addition, subsection (d) is unduly burdensome as it would require Epstein to cull through thousands of documents to determine which, if any, documents are responsive. Epstein also asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "Lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."). Without waiving the foregoing objections, Epstein will produce responsive + +documents in redacted form pursuant to the Agreed Order entered on May 21, 2010. + +The undersigned will produce additional documents the week of May 31, 2010. See attached. + +2. Any and all prescriptions for correctives lenses issued to you within the past five (5) years. + +**RESPONSE:** + +Documents responsive to this request have already been produced to Edwards. + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 3 day of June, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq., +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Counsel to Scott Rothstein +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 745-5849 +(954) 745-3556 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + +303 Banyan Boul ard, Suite 400 + +West Palm B ac FL 33401 + +(561) 842-2 0 + +(561) 253-0 + +By: + +Robe i.W itton, Jr. Florida Bar 24162 Michael J. Pi Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey EpstO \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c60ee49154aae2c591a64dcaaf6bce9de50da45 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809/EFTA02759809.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,858 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759809.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 15215, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.792, + 85.068 + ], + [ + 534.0283813476562, + 85.068 + ], + [ + 534.0283813476562, + 128.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 308.792, + 128.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.47600000000006, + 148.63 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 148.63 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 163.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 256.47600000000006, + 163.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.62, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 533.368, + 100.2 + ], + [ + 533.368, + 140.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 312.62, + 140.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.64000000000001, + 334.0 + ], + [ + 438.935302734375, + 334.0 + ], + [ + 438.935302734375, + 361.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 178.64000000000001, + 361.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.236, + 100.91399999999999 + ], + [ + 358.07611083984375, + 100.91399999999999 + ], + [ + 358.07611083984375, + 114.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 269.236, + 114.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.964, + 94.355 + ], + [ + 534.644, + 94.355 + ], + [ + 534.644, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 304.964, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.79, + 334.83500000000004 + ], + [ + 488.708, + 334.83500000000004 + ], + [ + 488.708, + 349.86499999999995 + ], + [ + 130.79, + 349.86499999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.75399999999999, + 148.63 + ], + [ + 187.57199999999997, + 148.63 + ], + [ + 187.57199999999997, + 163.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 116.75399999999999, + 163.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.116, + 202.07 + ], + [ + 187.57199999999997, + 202.07 + ], + [ + 187.57199999999997, + 217.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 116.116, + 217.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.82, + 257.17999999999995 + ], + [ + 370.39080810546875, + 257.17999999999995 + ], + [ + 370.39080810546875, + 271.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 248.82, + 271.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.326, + 104.375 + ], + [ + 530.0906982421875, + 104.375 + ], + [ + 530.0906982421875, + 145.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 304.326, + 145.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION PURSUANT \nTO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.5, + 338.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 462.54180908203125, + 338.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 462.54180908203125, + 365.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 159.5, + 365.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.49600000000001, + 161.541 + ], + [ + 192.676, + 161.541 + ], + [ + 192.676, + 175.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 122.49600000000001, + 175.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.58200000000001, + 238.80999999999997 + ], + [ + 191.4, + 238.80999999999997 + ], + [ + 191.4, + 253.00499999999997 + ], + [ + 120.58200000000001, + 253.00499999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.096, + 290.58 + ], + [ + 366.212, + 290.58 + ], + [ + 366.212, + 304.775 + ], + [ + 250.096, + 304.775 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759809" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759823/EFTA02759823.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759823/EFTA02759823.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f01dbbd0e57d1b5eb1c51adc975e9ecf584965d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759823/EFTA02759823.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +following: c YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED Nersigned has called up for hearing the t it + +DATE: Tuesday, June 29, 20144" l i TIME: 8:45 a.m. JUDGE: Hon. David (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +46A + +N.. CO i..: r; "'IP • :3:0g C ..... .. 7:1 L. • i)r^ = r 10' -- W3S -0 C) - 0 rn .4 t1 if you are unable to Identify each Plaintiff, please contact Robert D. Gittui4 Jr. at their names will be provided pursuant to a confidentiality agreement + +G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +### DUCES TECUM2 + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +1. a. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +2. b. Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; +3. c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +4. d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +5. e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +6. f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +1. a. Any Plaintiff and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] or any entity with which he has been associated; +2. b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and [REDACTED] Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +--- + +2 Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special [REDACTED] and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or Investor to any 6. All fee sharing agreements between J. Plaintiffs case. \Yr or Scott of any + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- b. J. RRA; Rothstein to create investment opportunities i for third party +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +7. cuments made available to any investor or potential investor by J. , RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rottisteln's entities to solicit \*Investors' for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entitles who invested or purported to invest In any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing payment of any bill or cost in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. NI documents wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorneys fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' cases were represented by RRA. + +11. NI documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FlorS which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +)1 12. All Conversadons recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives. hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +"13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +14. intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or Investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mall (e-mails) to and from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +18. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. 7 + +17. All documents related to the amount of Costs that were I by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. and is claiming or has claimed + +18. All documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Eps + +19. All documents which purport to mentioRany transfer of funders or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +20. All documents relating to any investment, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or a Rothstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +21. All emails e xei meld' se etween any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: + +- a. othstein Adler lam Berger Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne David B Deborah +- h. :.r•.= Barnett +- i. Rcicberts +- j. and (Rick) Fandry +- k. +- I. Brad ChrisSirman + +22. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, LM. or E.W. cases. + +- 23. All Q-Task 'Projects' that refer to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 24. All Q-Task Projects that refer to LM., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +25. AU documents that identify all Individuals who were granted access (mvited guests) or who had access to the Q-Task Projects referred to in request nos. 23 and 24. + +26. All documents, communications and letters sent by you assessing liens against the recoveries in: + +- a. LM. v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRa + +27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as ruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to LM., E.W. and Jane Doe% cases against E . This Includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is iming. + +28. i inent agreements or letters describing compensation and benefits for during his employment with RRA. + +29. All documents from the "Fortress' software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +30. All documents from the 'Forbess' software program that refer or relate to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +31. For the time period April 1, 2009 through November 5, 2009, all emalls to and from any employee, partner, shareholder, attorney, agent or client of RRA that reference any of the following: + +- . DIScala; 03 Capital Club, LLC Bill Clinton; +- d. Alan Dershowitz; a David Copperfieki; + - f. Kevin Spacey; + - g. Chris Tucker; + - h. Prince Andrew + - i. Jean-Luc Brunel; + - j. Tomm M toile; + - k. Bill + - I. Donald Trump. + +![](_page_11_Picture_145.jpeg) + +**BERGER SINGERMAN** +attorneys at law + +Boca Raton Fort Lauderdale Miami Tallahassee + +GIVING BACK. MOVING FORWARD + +Luis Torres +(954) 712-5127 +Ltorres@bergersingerman.com + +May 21, 2010 + +**VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +David A. Yarema, Esq. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Re: Subpoena Directed to Herbert Stettin in the case styled L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, +Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +Dear Mr. Critton and Mr. Yarema: + +Pursuant to the subpoena directed to Herbert Stettin ("Trustee") dated April 16, 2010 ("Subpoena") and the various communications we have had regarding the search parameters to be utilized in order to comply with the Subpoena, please be advised that the Trustee has retrieved approximately 6000 e-mails that might be responsive to the Subpoena. We want to make clear that the Trustee does not have the capability to run electronic searches over all of RRA's documents. Therefore, the 6000 e-mails which have been identified are from Scott Rothstein's and [REDACTED] Edward's e-mail accounts. We anticipate finalizing the review of e-mails for attorney-client privilege information by Friday, May 28, 2010, and we intend to produce responsive documents, along with a privilege log, by Monday, May 31, 2010. + +Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 954.712.5127. + +Sincerely, + +BERGER SINGERMAN + +![]()Luis [REDACTED] +Litigation Paralegal + +cc: James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. + +ANDREW HINKUS + +![](_page_11_Picture_163.jpeg) + +in support thereof state: Herbert Stettin, the Chapter 11 Trustee CAT the Debtor, Rothstein RosPhfeldtAdler, PA. ("RRA"), and Jeffrey Epstein, by and through this undersigned counsel, Burnett, move for the entry offitipulated Protective Order ("Stipulated Protective < Order") by and between the Trustee and ISEpstein- 's counsel, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www,flsb.usccautactov + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR Chapter 11 + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA., + +Debtor. + +O SA + +### JOINT EXPARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SWUM= PROTIWITVE ORDER (Expedited Relief Requested + +- I . Pursuant to this Court's Order Granting Trustee's Motion Seeking a Protective Order and Approving Proposed Document Production Protocol "(Order") [D.E. #672), the Trustee and Mr. Epstein, through counsel, jointly move for the entry of the Stipulated Protective Order. +- 2. The Trustee and Mr. Epstein, through counsel, request that the Stipulated Protective Order be entered without a hearing as the relief requested herein is in compliance with the Court's Order. +- 3. The Trustee and Mr. Epstein, through counsel, are requesting expedited relief so that Creditors can quickly begin the process of reviewing and analyzing voluminous information. + +WHEREFORE, the Trustee and Mr. Epstein, through counsel, jointly move for the entry of + +![](_page_12_Picture_9.jpeg) + +the Stipulated Protective Order by and between Trustee and Mr. Epstein, through counsel, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and for any and all other relief this Court deems just and equitable. + +Dated: day of June, 2010 + +FBN 195677 E Knight, FBN 607363 L. Ackerman, Jr., FBN 235954 J. FBN 647896 BURNETT PA 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +BY: + +Charles H. Lichtman FBN 501050 BEROER SINGERMAN Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee 350 East Las Olas Blvd., 10' Floor Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Fax: (954) 523-2872 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trtatVof the foregoing has been furnished via the Court's CM/ECF electronic noticing system all electronic filing participants with respect to this proceeding, this day of June, 2010. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day of June, 2010 by U.S. Mail to all parties listed on the service list below, and who are not registered to receive Notice of Electronic Filing in this case. + +Charles H. Lichtman, Esquire + +ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on + +Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts,gov + +CASE NO.: Chapter 11 09-34791-RBR + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, + +Debtor. + +### STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BY AND BETWEEN TRUSTEE AND CREDITORS + +Herbert Stettin, the Chapter I 1 Trustee ('"Trustee") of the Debtor, Rothstein RosehfelthAdler, PA ("RRA"), and Jeffrey Epstein, by and through this undersigned counsel, Burnett, PA, pursuant to this Court's May 18, 2010 oral ruling granting Trustee's Motion for Expedited Relief Seeking a Protective Order and Approving Proposed Document Production Protocol ( D.E. #617), hereby agree to and request Court approval of the following stipulation: + +It is expected that, to facilitate the sharing of RRA's information, including electronically stored MthorksLon ("rr), Mr. Epstein's counsel has submitted search criteria, including names of targeted a\ittitnditmq, search terms, date ranges, to/from, subject line contents, or other criteria to the Trustee to be applied against ESI in the possession of the Trustee. It is further anticipated that the Trustee's counsel and Mr. Epstein's counsel have agreed upon certain search criteria prior to the resulting data being produced to MR. Epstein's counsel. Finally, both parties seek the protection of + +![](_page_14_Picture_10.jpeg) + +the Court to ensure that they may share RRA information, including ESI, while preserving the privileges owed by RRA to its former clients. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: + +1. All resulting data from the search terms provided to the Trustee by Mr. Epstein's counsel shall be made available to Mr. Epstein and his counsel after the entry of this Stipulated Protective Order. Counsel for MR Epstein shall immediately return any documents, ESI or other RRA information produced by the Trustee that is, or appears that it may be protected by attorney/client privilege relating to RRA's representation of any former di\* Should any such 14/ 1 disclosure of attorney/client privileged or work-product doctrine protected documents occur, upon the Parties' compliance with the terms of this Stipulated Pro Order, that disclosure shall be deemed waived by that disclosure int his or any other action Federal or State proceeding, pursuant of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(dXe) and Fitt of Civil Procedrue 26(b)(5XB), regardless of state decisional law. + +2. Neither Mr. Epstein nor tinsel shall publish, diggeminia, or make public any documents or ESI, or the contents thereof provided by the Trustee without first submitting the dornimrnts or ESI to be used to the Trustee or his counsel for authorization, unless MR. Epstein or his counsel obtained the identical information from another non-privileged source. The lInstee chRII examine any derianenrs or ESI to be used by Mr. Epstein's counsel for privilege or protection before authorizing its use by said counseL Mr. Epstein's counsel must receive written auttunization from ti the Trusted .Sr to any publication, dissemination, or sue of any documents or ESI received from the Trusteewhich would make those documents or ESI public. + +3. Neither the Trustee nor his counsel ahal l publish, dicsrminatP or make public the list of search criteria submitted by Mr. Epstein's counsel nor a list of the documents that ESI supplied to Mr. Epstein or his counsel unless so compelled by Court Order. + +4. If any party identifies that privileged and/or protected documents of ESI have been produced to Mr. Epstein's counsel and said counsel fades to promptly return that protected information, and if any unauthorized publication of information provided by the Trustee to Mr. Epstein's counsel occurs in violation of this Stipulated Protective Order, the Trustee may move for injunctive relief on an emergency and/or expedited basis, including the application for an ex parte order enjoining possession, publication or other use of any RICA information, including documents or ESI. + +5. This protective order is not intended to nor does it apply 1p Grp scoot patty not explicitly named hetrin. + +Submitted by; + +IS C) ) Lill Ann FBN 195677 E. Knivh FBN 607363 L. Ackerman, Jr., FBN 235954 ., J. J • FBN 647896 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive 11\* West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 4lit)") Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Copies to: + +Attorney Lilly Ann shall serve this Order on all interested panics and file a certificate of service within 3 days of this Order. + +**SERVED VIA ECF NOTICE** + +- • Grisel Alonso grisel.alonso@usdoj.gov, daleana.roque@usdoj.gov +- • Brett M Amron bamron@bastamron.com, + jrivera@bastamron.com,jeder@bastamron.com +- • Jeffrey Bast jbast@bastamron.com, + kjay@bastamron.com;jdepina@bastamron.com;kmiller@bastamron.com;dquick@bastamron.com +- • Jeffrey M Berman jberman@klugerkaplan.com +- • John G. Bianco III jgb@trippscott.com, bankruptcynoticecenter@trippscott.com +- • Mark D Bloom bloomm@gtlaw.com, + phillipsj@gtlaw.com;MiaLitDock@gtlaw.com;miaecfbky@gtlaw.com +- • Francis L. Carter flc@katzbarron.com, lcf@katzbarron.com +- • David C. Cimo dcimo@gjb-law.com, gjbecf@gjb-law.com +- • Robert C Furr bnasralla@furrcohen.com +- • John H Genovese jgenovese@gjb-law.com, cgreco@gjb-law.com;dsanchez@gjb-law.com;gjbecf@gjb-law.com +- • Michael I Goldberg michael.goldberg@akerman.com, charlene.cerda@akerman.com +- • Maynard Gollin lmg@tewlaw.com +- • Jordi Guso jguso@bergersingerman.com, + efile@bergersingerman.com;fsellers@bergersingerman.com +- • Phillip M. Hudson III pmhudson@arnstein.com, + rkcummings@arnstein.com;crperry@arnstein.com;jtunis@arnstein.com;hpiloto@arnstein.com;akang@arnstein.com;lhlamchick@arnstein.com +- • Isaac M Marcushamer imarcushamer@bergersingerman.com, + efile@bergersingerman.com;ngorman@bergersingerman.com +- • Arthur C. Neiwirth aneiwirthcourt@qpwblaw.com, aneiwirthcourt@aol.com +- • Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov +- • Patricia A Redmond predmond@stearnsweaver.com, + jmartinez@swmwas.com;ross@swmwas.com +- • Jeffrey C. Roth jeff@rothandscholl.com, christine@rothandscholl.com +- • William G Salim Jr wsalim@mmsslaw.com, cleibovitz@mmsslaw.com +- • Reggie David Sanger ecfmail@reggiedsangerpa.com, rdsoffice@gmail.com +- • Steven D Schneiderman Steven.D.Schneiderman@usdoj.gov +- • Michael D. Seese mseese@hinshawlaw.com, lportuondo@hinshawlaw.com +- • S Shraiberg bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com, lmelton@sfl-pa.com;lrosetto@sfl-pa.com;blee@sfl-pa.com +- • Paul Steven Singerman singerman@bergersingerman.com, + efile@bergersingerman.com +- • Marika Tolz TolzECFmail@aol.com, mtolz@ecf.epiqsystems.com +- • Henry S Wulf hwulf@carltonfields.com, kvickers@carltonfields.com + +# SERVED VIA U.S, MAIL + +Blue Oaks Limited do Marianella Morales AvenidaFrancisco de Miranda Torre Provincial "A" Piso 8 Caracas, 1060 + +Mark F Booth 1401 E Broward Blvd #300 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +S. Fischer 200 SW 1st Avenue Suite 910 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jeffrey A. Goldwater 550 West Street Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60661 + +Cary A Lubetaky 800 Brickell Ave #1501 Miami, FL 33131 + +Canillo Manrique do Marianella Morales Avenida Francisco de Miranda + +Ricardo do Marianella Morales Avenida Francisco de Miranda Torre Provincial "A" Piso 8 Caracas, 1060 + +Pharos Development Assets, Inc do Marianella Morales Avenida Francisco de Miranda Torre Provincial "A" Piso 8 Caracas, 1060 + +Richard A. Pollack 200 S Biscayne Blvd 6 Fl Miami, FL 33131 + +Adria E Quintets Lake Shore Plaza II 1300 Concord Tarr #130 Sunrise, FL 33323 + +Jeffrey R Sonn 500 E Broward Blvd #1600 Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +rt Stettin 2 S Biscayne Blvd #3700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Universal Legal 888 E Las Olas Blvd #508 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on 05/18/10 + +![](_page_19_Picture_17.jpeg) + +Gaymond B. Ray, +Raymond B. Ray, Judge +United States Bankruptcy Court + +UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION +[www.flsb.uscourts.gov](http://www.flsb.uscourts.gov) + +In re: CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S MOTION SEEKING A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND APPROVING PROPOSED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PROTOCOL [D.E. #617]** + +THIS █ TITER came before the Court on May 18, 2010 at 9:30 a.m on the Motion by Trustee Stettin For Expedited Relief Seeking A Protective Order And Approving Proposed Document Production Protocol (the "Motion for Protective Order") [D.E. #617]. The Court has reviewed the Motion for Protective Order, and the Response to Trustee's Motion for Expedited Relief Seeking Protective Order and Approving Proposed Document Production Protocol ("Response") [D.E. #667] filed by Certain Creditors of RRA as detailed therein, and having heard the argument of counsel and otherwise being fully advised, + +**DOES HEREBY ORDER:** + +![](_page_19_Picture_26.jpeg) + +- I. The Trustee's Motion for Protective Order is Granted. +- 2. To protect against the incidental disclosure of documents or Electronically Stored Information ("ESP') (hereinafter collectively "RRA Information") protected by any RRA attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(13) and Federal Rule of Evidence 502, the Court approves the following protocol to govern any demand, subpoena or request for production of RRA2' ,tectronically stored information: + - A. Requesting Parties shall provide all search criteria, including names of targeted custodians, search terms, date ranges, to/from, subject line contents, or other criteria ("Search") to be applied against the RRA information, t9,11'Trustee. + - B. The Trustee will conduct the requested Search of RRA information after the mutual execution and filing with the Court of a Stipulated Protective Order. The Stipulated Protective Order shall include a clawback provision in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(bX5)(B), which shall require the Requesting Party to destroy or return all copies of any documents, ESI or other RRA information that is made available to the Requesting Party as a result of the Search that is privileged data related to RRA's former representation of any former client. The Stipulated Protective Order shall allow the Trustee to move for immediate emergency injunctive relief to protect RRA's Client's privilege if necessary + - C. Before the Requesting Party publishes, files or distributes to any other party any information obtained from the document repository ("Resulting Data"), that Resulting Data intended to be used by the Requesting Party, unless otherwise available from other sources besides the Trustee, shall be disclosed to the Trustee who shall conduct a review for RRA's client's privilege before any RRA information may be published or otherwise used or distributed by the Receiving Party. 4TThe terms of any filed Stipulated Protective Order shall apply to any subsequent to the Trustee for Search of RRA information by that Requesting Party. +- 3. The Trustee agrees to keep any keywords or search criteria provided to the Trustee by any Requesting Party confidential, only to be disclosed when required by Court Order. + +4. By sharing any RRA Information with a third party document management system vendor, the Trustee does not waive any privilege or confidentiality over any documents otherwise protected by the work product doctrine or attomey-client privilege. + +5. All Requesting Parties seeking production of responsive documents or ESI shall file with the Court their Stipulated Protective Orders before any access to any documents or ESI is provided by the Trustee to that Requesting Party. + +6. Assuming compliance with this Order, any inadvertent dir losure of privileged material by the Trustee to any Requesting Party char! not be mantis' d as a waiver of any privilege pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 502(d) and (e). + +7. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect loaners arising from or related to the implementation or interpretation of this Order. As \ , + +Submitted bv: (ic \I Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. /\*\* BERGER SINGERMAN, PA, Attorneys for Chapter I I Trustee, Stein Atom& 350 E. Las Olas Blvd. '. ) Suite 1000 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Facsimile: (954)523-2872 Direct Telephone: (954) 712-5138 clichtinan@beruersingernum .coin + +Copy furnished to; Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. (Attorney Lich:man is directed to serve this Order to all parties of interest and to file a Certificate of Service.) + +2.6141C0-1 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/EFTA02759828.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/EFTA02759828.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2959e5402c4c72aabb46d37f973b70310568f620 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/EFTA02759828.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1153 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 22, + "chars": 35731, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.89, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_18.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_145.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_163.jpeg", + "_page_12_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_14_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_19_Picture_17.jpeg", + "_page_19_Picture_26.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.23400000000004, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 538.479, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 538.479, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 288.23400000000004, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE, HERBERT STETTIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.21400000000001, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 516.771, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 516.771, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 83.21400000000001, + 342.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION \u2014 DOCI C NT$ ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.86599999999999, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.11602783203125, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.11602783203125, + 297.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 133.86599999999999, + 297.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE STATE OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.81700000000001, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 212.06802368164062, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 212.06802368164062, + 321.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 83.81700000000001, + 321.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.305, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 322.5648498535156, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 322.5648498535156, + 102.697021484375 + ], + [ + 262.305, + 102.697021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.784, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 387.7109375, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 387.7109375, + 128.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 197.784, + 128.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.24499999999998, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 339.4889999999999, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 339.4889999999999, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 250.24499999999998, + 128.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.77199999999999, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 237.582, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 237.582, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 74.77199999999999, + 215.46000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww,flsb.usccautactov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.769, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 405.4412841796875, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 405.4412841796875, + 139.728515625 + ], + [ + 194.769, + 139.728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT EXPARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SWUM= PROTIWITVE ORDER \n(Expedited Relief Requested", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.611, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 512.755126953125, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 512.755126953125, + 314.4785461425781 + ], + [ + 82.611, + 314.4785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.507, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 376.68023681640625, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 376.68023681640625, + 409.3485412597656 + ], + [ + 222.507, + 409.3485412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts,gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.96000000000004, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 403.9412841796875, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 403.9412841796875, + 221.103515625 + ], + [ + 192.96000000000004, + 221.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BY AND BETWEEN \nTRUSTEE AND CREDITORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.911, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 447.1809997558594, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 447.1809997558594, + 395.4835510253906 + ], + [ + 142.911, + 395.4835510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVED VIA ECF NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.125, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 370.242, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 370.242, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 226.125, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVED VIA U.S, MAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.376, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 367.2918395996094, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 367.2918395996094, + 99.6085205078125 + ], + [ + 236.376, + 99.6085205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S MOTION SEEKING A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND APPROVING PROPOSED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PROTOCOL [D.E. #617]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.465, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 527.625, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 527.625, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 93.465, + 473.84999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759828" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_145.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_145.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f1ea7e06f48a93515e5e655e1cba1a4894a9f6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_145.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a480215c44387aa2a08d84ec8a8f8a26e53a4fc9481a92ed18b60fa202a94b28 +size 4602 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_163.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_163.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e2040fff601bf835e49cd629c8fb17f00c479e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_11_Picture_163.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a72b745994265a22d4bf2796af6f033bf7ab891e7700fcb76558d2d1fb8a9bfb +size 8861 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_12_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_12_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5bf1a19ea31268bc26b0e7ef9470d091bc62e055 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_12_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0575e4e9892c307f2f3fae6af0246681a0d4d1014e0f854708b430989a7fece9 +size 7937 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_14_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_14_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22379c2ce1f89e9fec1a0fddca8ca5bce5cc387c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_14_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cd9a683360a3a8028dd263f51803b07685e6867420c2c7914bfeb4cd70272324 +size 8323 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b738066f32b480d4c765eb3049f449c26e604384 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:de2957dfaab9fae8ee9e5a15d348be1afbb993c3f8c5e37a903483f2deb2ab93 +size 8141 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..650e88bf1906828fe6733e92108a799c0ddc2ff3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_19_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:956e603449acd0ac35d33e3e0512e031b3d44b46ca2163ea0efafb2ac17b3d6c +size 7644 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_4_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_4_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c29db6daf039ea09cfb1c785b056885063058e15 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759828/_page_4_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:43c50f87ae8532a101e2ea8224ff32f3698a64dcfddf89298a0144d7f6f8c1b7 +size 8352 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18479e4c4a39dd10dcd7f2d1a92d03ab447c85b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.md @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +COMES NOW L.M., by and th h undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 14, / 0); a hereby files this Motion for Protective Order regarding the documents and i ation sought by Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein in the Deposition Duces Tecum served on Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA, ("RRA"), and as grounds states as follows: + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXX\*1BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +;') + +S n - ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +ACQ + +# MOTION FOR PROTeiTIVE ORDER + +- 1. L.M. is one of many victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation; as such, her civil lawsuit against Epstein is currently active and pending. +- 2. L.M. was represented by attorneys at RRA prior to the collapse of that firm. +- 3. Epstein served a deposition duces tecum on Herbert Stettin, trustee for RRA, requesting documents and information that are clearly protected by attorney- + +client and work product privilege. (See Exhibit A, depo duces tecum served on Herbert Stettin as RRA trustee). + +- 4. Epstein is attempting to use his lawsuit against L.M. as a vehicle to pierce the attorney client and work product privilege and gain access to privileged information related to L.M.'s civil action against him. +- 5. Epstein served Requests for Production on Brad la, L.M.'s attorney, who Epstein also named as a Defendant in the ' stant action; that discovery requests identical information to that sought b i Duces Tecum served on Herbert Stettin. +- 6. Appropriate work-product and atbOney-client privilege objections were made to those requests. (See Exhibit It Epstein's requests for Production to Brad and answers thereto). +- 7. The trustee for RRA is effectively standing in the shoes of the former RRA ) attorneys and clients on issues such as this, and thus Epstein cannot request discovery from the RRA trustee to circumvent the privilege. +- 8. The discovery Epstein is seeking should not be allowed as it is clearly protected by privilege. + +WHEREFORE, L.M. and her counsel respectfully move this Court to enter an Order of protection preventing Epstein from obtaining the discovery he is seeking in his Subpoena Duces Tecum to Herbert Stettin. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail and email to all counsel on the attached list on June 2010. + +> M, Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, EL 33304' (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax Atto e Defendant LAE + +By Gary :'`farmer, Jr. Florida r No.: 914444 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Protective Order + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, Bradley +[REDACTED] + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION – DOCUMENTS ONLY + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Roth [REDACTED] Rosenfeldt Adler, PA +C/O James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Blscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at P [REDACTED] Court Reporting, 101 NE 3rd Avenue, +Suite #1500, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, on May 19, 2010, 4:00 p.m., bring with you the +following: + +See attached Exhibit A + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless +excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as +directed. + +DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. + +![]()BY: + +![]()12492 +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. +For the Court + +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +(Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 + +![](_page_4_Picture_168.jpeg) + +Attached + +# EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes. messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, , electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice arldjatra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings on pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations4 any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and 7 recordings), and including the file and file cover. + +The term "Document" also means any and all computer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, + +microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280512CCOMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jana Dsitiliparthoe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Madan, and any other person who Is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +E. "Money' s any tangible thing of value. + +F. "Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriff's service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +&#x27; If you are unable to identify each Plaintiff, please contact Robert D. Cnttort Jr. at their names will be provided pursuant to a confidentiality agreement + +G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +### DUCES TECUM2 + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +1. a. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +2. b. Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; +3. c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +4. d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +5. e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +6. f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +1. a. Any Plaintiff and Bradley J. [REDACTED] or any entity with which he has been associated; +2. b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and [REDACTED] Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +--- + +2 Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special [REDACTED] and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. Scott W. Rothst in +- b. J. . +- c. PR! +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey tein. + +6. All fee sharing agreements between J. Ma, ROA, o Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to rty aspect of any Plaintiffs case. + +MI. All documents made available to any investor potential investor by J. RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of . Rothstein's entities to solicit investors for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing payment of any bill or cost in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' cases were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents related to the amount of Costs that were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. and is claiming or has claimed + +18. All documents which purport to evidence any traisfer Of funds or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +19. All documents which purport to mention any transfer of funders or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +20. All documents relating to any investment, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or a Rothstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +21. All emails exchanged between any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: + +- a. +- b. Scott Rothstein Adler i lam Berger Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne David Boden +- h. Deborah +- h. Andrew Barnett +- i. Rocberts and (Rick) Fandry +- k. Christina Kitterman +- I. Brad + ++ + +22. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +- 23. All Q-Task "Projects" that refer to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 24. All Q-Task Projects that refer to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +25. All documents that identify all individuals who were granted access (invited guests) or who had access to the O-Task Projects referred to in request nos. 23 and 24. + +26. All documents, communications and letters sent by you assessing liens against the recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051X)OO(MB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRN + +27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as bankruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases against Epstein. This includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is claiming. + +28. An employment agreements or letters describing compensation and benefits for during his employment with RRA. + +29. All documents from the Ness' software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +30. All documents fr ortress° software program that refer or relate to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. ,),14/ + +31. For the time period April 1, 2009 through November 5, 2009, all emails to and from any employee, partner, shareholder, attorney, agent or client of RRA that reference any of the following: + +- a. A.k. DiScala; %,D3 Capital Club, LLC Bill Clinton; Alan Dershowit; a David Copperfield; +- f. Kevin Spacey; +- g. Chris Tucker; +- h. Prince Andrew +- i. Jean-Luc Brunel; +- j. Tomfr otolle; +- k. Bill +- I. Dona rump. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. Case No. 50 2009CAO40800X)OO(MB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO + +0 + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.350, requests that Defendant, J. EDDt, a), produce or make available for inspection documents respons'SI , requests below within thirty (30) days from the date of service: + +### DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, including>1) not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples + +![](_page_11_Picture_12.jpeg) + +etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and recordings), and including the file and file cover. + +The term "Document' also means any and all rds, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, lian:1 drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, so4Nvati or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Conrtuitions" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquialism, d )cu salon, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XX;CCMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280581OOO0W3), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case ti08-civ-80893-Mama/,), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +- D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. +- E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. +- F. "Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices ocubpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, cotnier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, investigative bills, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + - G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +# REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION' + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +- Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; .4 C. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against + +&#x27; Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage he production of documents.

Jeffrey Epstein;

  • f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff.

2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following:

  • a. Any Plaintiff and J. has been associated;
  • b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. or any entity with which he

ails, data, correspondence, memos, or si uments between J. Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey).

4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between J. Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffre hich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandreyjv

A:\ 5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the followingir

  • a. Scott W. Rot
    • J.
  • c.
  • b.
  • e. any entity fo y RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein

6. All fee ehttlitg agreements between J. RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiffs case.

7. All documents made available to any investor or potential investor by J. MIK RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to l is investors or any case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein.

9. All documents evidencing the Costs and payment of any bill or Costs in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs.

10. All documents received by you or your current firm wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' were represented by RRA.

11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein.

12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions).

13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions).

14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are saved or stored in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions).

15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to or from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA.

16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA.

17. All documents supporting the contention that a sexual assault took place on an airplane purportedly owned by Jeffrey Epstein or a Jeffrey Epstein entity at any time between 1998 and 2005.

18. All documents related to the amount of all Costs that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA.

19. All documents setting forth to the amount of Costs were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. during the time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee).

20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following:

"What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as our investigation resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children.

We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children, and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working undemeath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these gds."

(A) Provide all documents to support this assertion including any documents which are the source of the information.

21. All documents related to or mentioning potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases.

22. All documents that support your claim of damages in your counterclaim in this case.

23. The written fee agreement 4 4S, representation of you in this case. my Denney firm for their

24. All emails exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or a similar reference was mentioned:

  • a.
  • b. Mottistein Adler
  • c. William Berger
  • d. Michael Fisten •A Kenneth Jenne
  • 1. David Boden Deborah Andrew Bamett Richard (Rick) Fandrey Christina Kitterman.

25. A copy of your RRA business card.

26. Any employment agreements, letter agreements or memos given to you by RRA or a representative or agent of RRA describing your compensation and benefits at RRA.

27. All documents and communications from Herbert Stettin, as bankruptcy Trustee for RRA, asserting liens against recoveries in:

  • a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB
  • b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB
  • c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRAV [REDACTED]

Certificate of Service

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of April, 2010:

Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq.
[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos
& Lehrman, PL
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
954-524-2820
954-524-2822 – fax
Attorneys for Defendant, L.M.

Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
Fax: 561-835-8691
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Scarola, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart &
Shipley, P.A
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
686-6300
383-9424 F
Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] RC S. NURIK, ESQ.
Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One East Broward Boulevard
Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
954-745-5849
954-745-3556 Fax
Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein

BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP
303 Banyan Boulevard
Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
(561) 842-2820
(561) 253-0164 Fax

By:

(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Mar jailliviniciduivaildlytkilly, and L.M.,

Defendant.

/

DEFENDANT aLIWRESFt\*SE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PROD CTION ATED APRIL 12, 2010

L

Defendant, J. , hereby files his Response to Request for

Production propounded by Plaintiff on April 12, 2010 as follows:

  • 1. None.
  • 2. a. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the LL discovery of admissible evidence. None.
  • 3. . ( Objection as to communications to or from investigators as that is \ protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege.
  • 4. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege.
  • 5. None.
  • 6. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any investor.

  • 7. None.
  • 8. None.
  • 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead discovery of admissible evidence. the
  • 10. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence.
  • 11. None.
  • 12. None.
  • 13. None.
  • 14. None.
  • 15. None.
  • 16. None.
  • 17. Objection, relevandt )tot reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, ambiguous.
  • 18. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
  • 19. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and protected by the work-product privilege. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege.
  • 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege.
  • 22. Not yet determined.

502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10

  • 23. Objection.
  • 24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege.
  • 25. None in Defendant's possession.
  • 26. None.
  • 27. None in Defendant's possession.

AS C) )

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on MAY 11TH, 2010.
FAX AND

Jack Scarola
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] Edwards
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9461

By:

Jack Scarola

Florida Bar No.: 169440

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..757cfa07d37c53aae8019e2179962ba1be442fdd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/EFTA02759850.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 22, + "chars": 35235, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.92, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_168.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.0, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 531.2371215820312, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 531.2371215820312, + 123.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 303.0, + 123.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTeiTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.6, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 404.7580871582031, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 404.7580871582031, + 382.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 195.6, + 382.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.0, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 380.136474609375, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 380.136474609375, + 138.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 219.0, + 138.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.2, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 363.0, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 363.0, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 271.2, + 138.51 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.79999999999995, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 490.79999999999995, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 490.79999999999995, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 286.79999999999995, + 122.30999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION \u2013 DOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.79999999999998, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 472.80000000000007, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 472.80000000000007, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 127.79999999999998, + 289.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE STATE OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.39999999999999, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 204.6, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 204.6, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 77.39999999999999, + 311.85 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.8, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 329.69482421875, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 329.69482421875, + 100.072021484375 + ], + [ + 268.8, + 100.072021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.8, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 395.9708251953125, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 395.9708251953125, + 125.572021484375 + ], + [ + 202.8, + 125.572021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.2, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 340.79999999999995, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 340.79999999999995, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 250.2, + 123.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.6, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 433.8, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 433.8, + 316.8120422363281 + ], + [ + 156.6, + 316.8120422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.8, + 431.2952880859375 + ], + [ + 392.97265625, + 431.2952880859375 + ], + [ + 392.97265625, + 445.0720520019531 + ], + [ + 199.8, + 445.0720520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.99999999999997, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 379.5364685058594, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 379.5364685058594, + 409.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 209.99999999999997, + 409.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.40000000000003, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.4, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.4, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 239.40000000000003, + 188.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.59999999999997, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 514.9818115234375, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 514.9818115234375, + 142.822021484375 + ], + [ + 297.59999999999997, + 142.822021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.625, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 227.625, + 158.76 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759850" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_11_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_11_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..815a14cdeaf4da46d6a3920d11ac9f21192bf46b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_11_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2389b63d973a118c5a9f7aa0a84281f287b1f239ea2d32c0c025c9582e2e3b48 +size 6421 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_4_Picture_168.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_4_Picture_168.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6c80586ce27db010e9009c7f5d5d03054d21277 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759850/_page_4_Picture_168.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52c17eaf55c987fce5e39dbf85410b1fc82b2656abfc1d5e309f528c2f2e424c +size 5381 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5dba91281deb9564cf0309304f217d5f8f53d2f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.md @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +C -ft m + +# BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +Herbert Stettin, Trustee of the • ptcy Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A. ("Trustee"), hereby files this Supp otion for Protective Order pursuant to Rule 1.410 and 1.280(c), and states: + +1. On November 10, 2009, the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") was placed into involuntary bankruptcy, with a case pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On November 20, 2009, Herbert Stettin was appointed Trustee of RRA by the bankruptcy Court. + +2. On April 16, 2010, Plaintiff caused a subpoena duces tecum ("Subpoena") to be served on the Trustee seeking documents from a lawsuit that is currently active and pending, being litigated by ex-RRA lawyers. A copy of the Subpoena is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. + +3. On May 19, 2010, the Trustee filed a Motion for Protective Order addressing issues primarily relating to costs associated with reviewing and compiling responsive documents to the subpoena. A copy of the Motion for Protective Order is annexed hereto as Exhibit B. + +4. On June 18, 2010, counsel for L.M. filed a Motion for Protective Order. A copy of the Motion for Protective Order is annexed hereto as Exhibit C. + +5. Within the bankruptcy court, the Trustee obtained a protective order haling with its production of documents. The Trustee believes that the documents req the Subpoena are subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doc1 'e, t are simply, actually the clients documents, even though the Trustee holds the attorne Client privilege as to RRA. + +6. However, since the former RRA attorneys )14/ when the firm was closed, the Trustee is effectively standing'n the shoes of the former RRA ed their files from RRA attorneys and clients, and thus the Subpoena cannot request discovery from the Trustee to somehow circumvent the attorney-client privilege. + +WHEREFORE, for the fo ojnJ asons, the Trustee requests this Court to grant this 1. Motion and enter an Order of protection prohibiting Plaintiff from obtaining the discovery sought in the Subpoena. + +Respectfully submitted, + +BERGER SINGERMAN Counsel for the Trustee 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Tenth Floor Miami, Florida 33131 305.755.9500 305.714.4340 (facsimile) + +By: + +harles H. Eichtman Florida Bar No. 501050 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail and facsimile on Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr., Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL; Mr. Marc Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; Mr. Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL; Mr. Gary , Esq., Jaffe Weissing, et al., 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330 and Mr. Jack ( "wS Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and to Rodney Janis, Esq., Fow Point, West Tower, 777 S. Hagler Dr., Ste 901, West Pal of June, 2010. Burnett, P.A., orida 33401 this Pliti" day + +Charles H. tic + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, +v. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION – DOCUMENTS ONLY + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Roth [REDACTED] Rosenfeldt Adler, PA +C/O James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at P [REDACTED] Court Reporting, 101 NE 3rd Avenue, +Suite #1500, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, on May 19, 2010, 4:00 p.m., bring with you the +following: + +See attached Exhibit A + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless +excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as +directed. + +DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. + +![]()ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +(Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 + +![]()![](_page_3_Picture_155.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae49f21260f133aba65a14dbb4bae3f059aa4e19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/EFTA02759872.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4781, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.82, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_155.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.189, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 519.0283813476562, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 519.0283813476562, + 111.35302734375 + ], + [ + 279.189, + 111.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.315, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 536.2633666992188, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 536.2633666992188, + 385.85302734375 + ], + [ + 63.315, + 385.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.286, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 383.229736328125, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 383.229736328125, + 83.8585205078125 + ], + [ + 218.286, + 83.8585205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.852, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 495.66599999999994, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 495.66599999999994, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 291.852, + 121.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION \u2013 DOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.263, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 480.591, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 480.591, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 133.263, + 294.84000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759872" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/_page_3_Picture_155.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/_page_3_Picture_155.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc752e38d21dba7941759f0eb8637e32b642d05a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759872/_page_3_Picture_155.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c5d588a79f3d028f4dfb9648782f4e1e12719dcf4ff5a608724f7b7619f3e78 +size 7599 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34ca7d5d4ae70e7d59a65e9f3e7d522d0696e9e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.md @@ -0,0 +1,1074 @@ +**IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA** + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +**BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER** + +Herbert Stettin, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A. ("Trustee"), hereby files this Supplemental Motion for Protective Order pursuant to Rule 1.410 and 1.280(c), and states: + +1. On November 10, 2009, the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") was placed into involuntary bankruptcy, with a case pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On November 20, 2009, Herbert Stettin was appointed Trustee of RRA by the bankruptcy Court. + +2. On April 16, 2010, Plaintiff caused a subpoena *duces tecum* ("Subpoena") to be served on the Trustee seeking documents from a lawsuit that is currently active and pending, being litigated by ex-RRA lawyers. A copy of the Subpoena is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. + +FILED +10 JUN 25 PM 1:12 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL ? + +FILED + +3. On May 19, 2010, the Trustee filed a Motion for Protective Order addressing issues primarily relating to costs associated with reviewing and compiling responsive documents to the subpoena. A copy of the Motion for Protective Order is annexed hereto as Exhibit B. + +4. On June 18, 2010, counsel for L.M. filed a Motion for Protective Order. A copy of the Motion for Protective Order is annexed hereto as Exhibit C. + +5. Within the bankruptcy court, the Trustee obtained a protective order dealing with its production of documents. The Trustee believes that the documents requ the Subpoena are subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doedoctr are simply, actually the clients documents, even though the Trustee holds the atto -client privilege as to RRA. + +6. However, since the former RRA attorneys nev ned their files from RRA when the firm was closed, the Trustee is effectively standing/in the shoes of the former RRA attorneys and clients, and thus the Subpoe iitumot request discovery from the Trustee to somehow circumvent the attorney-client + +WHEREFORE, for the foe : ,ns, the Trustee requests this Court to grant this Motion and enter an Order o p o on prohibiting Plaintiff from obtaining the discovery sought in the Subpoena. zer (s, Respectfully submitted, + +BERGER SINGERMAN Counsel for the Trustee 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Tenth Floor Miami, Florida 33131 305.755.9500 305.714.4340 (facsimile) + +By: + +harles H. chtman Florida Bar No. 501050 + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail and facsimile on **Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr.**, Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL; **Mr. Marc Nurik, Esq.**, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401; **Mr. Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.**, West Palm Beach, FL; **Mr. Gary [REDACTED]**, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing, et al., 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and **Mr. Jack Goldberger, Esq.**, Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and to **Rodney Janis, Esq.**, [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A., [REDACTED] Point, West Tower, 777 S. Flagler Dr., Ste 901, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 this 24th day of June, 2010. + +![]()IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION – DOCUMENTS ONLY + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Roth [REDACTED] Rosenfeldt Adler, PA +C/O James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at P [REDACTED] Court Reporting, 101 NE 3rd Avenue, +Suite #1500, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, on May 19, 2010, 4:00 p.m., bring with you the +following: + +See attached Exhibit A + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless +excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as +directed. + +DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. + +![]()ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +(Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 + +![]()![](_page_3_Picture_168.jpeg) + +# EXHIBIT A + +# DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copo otherwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, eitiails,1 electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, r rts, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade informatiaNga ing fabric, carpets, samples 4 etc..., computer printouts, prospectuse 'financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transkripp, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings, rotion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and record s), and including the file and file cover. + +The term "Document" also means any and all computer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written staterrni, dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstehereach County Case #502008CA028051)OOC(MB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeff Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058)OOC(MB), Jane Doell e Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-latare), and any other person who Is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffragetein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +E. 'Money' rrteans any tangible thing of value. + +include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs servigaenY any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +1 If you are unable to identify each Plaintiff, please contact Robert D. Critton, Jr. at their names will be provided pursuant to a confidentiality agreement + +G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +### DUCES TECUM2 + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +1. a. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +2. b. Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; +3. c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +4. d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +5. e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +6. f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +1. a. Any Plaintiff and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] or any entity with which he has been associated; +2. b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and [REDACTED] Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +--- + +2 Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special [REDACTED] and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- J. +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +7 6. All fee sharing agreements between J. or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to -n aspect of any 'EIS A, Plaintiff's case. + +cuments made available to any investor Or potential investor by , RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing payment of any bill or cost in each Plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the x tivirce(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' cases were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents related to the amount of Costs that wetre incuffed by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. and is claimini cit- slaimed + +18. All documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +19. All documents which purport to mention any transfer of hinders or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against + +'to Ed.. N\_ 20. All documents relating lo y>investment, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or 9 othstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +21. All emails exchanged between any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: + +- a. othstein Adler am Berger Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne David Boden Deborah Andrew Bamett Rocberts is and (Rick) Fandry Christina Kitterman Brad + +22. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +- 23. All Q-Task Projects" that refer to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 24. AU Q-Task Projects that refer to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +25. All documents that identify all individuals who were granted access (invited guests) or who had access to the Q-Task Projects referred to in request nos. 23 and 24. + +26. All documents, communications and letters sent by you assessing liens against the recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XMXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119- RN + +27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as bankruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases against Epstein. This includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is claiming. + +V describing compensation and benefits for 28. itiar mnent agreements or le during his employment with RRA. + +29. All documents from the "Fortress" software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +30. All documents from the "Fortress" software program that refer or relate to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +31. For the time period April 1, 2009 through November 5, 2009, all emails to and from any employee, partner, shareholder, attorney, agent or client of RRA that reference anyAthe forting: + +- A.J. DiScala; D3 Capital Club, LLC Bill Clinton; +- d. Alan Dershowitz; +- e. David Copperfield; +- f. Kevin Spacey; +- g. Chris Tucker; +- h. Prince Andrew +- i. Jean-Luc Brunel; +- j. Tommy Motolla; +- k. Bill +- I. Donald Trump. + +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 09-61780-OV-2LOCH/ROSENBAUM + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +VARIOUS REAL PROPERTIES PURCHASED BY OR WITH OR ON BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, SPECIFICALLY: + +- ( I) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2307 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (2) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2308 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (3) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2316 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (4) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENAN LOCATED AT 30 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (5) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 29 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (6) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 350 SE Te STREET, UNIT 2840, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (7) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 380 CARRINGTON DRIVE, WESTON, FLORIDA; +- (8) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2133 IMPERIAL POINT DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +AND INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTIES ("RP"), VEHICLES & VESSELS ("VV"), TANGIBLES ("T"), BANK ACCOUNTS ("BA"), BUSINESS + +CO + +AS 5) + +![](_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg) + +INTERESTS ("Br) AND CONTRIBUTIONS ("C"), SPECIFICALLY: + +(RP9) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2627 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP I 0) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 10630 NW 14TM STREET, APT. 110, PLANTATION, FLORIDA; + +(RP I 1) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 227 GARDEN COURT, LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, FLORIDA; + +(RP12) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 708 SPANGLER BOULEVARD, BAY 1, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA; + +(RP13) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 1012 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RPI4) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 950 N FEDERAL HIGHWAY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP15) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 350 LAS OLAS BOULEV COMMERCIAL UNIT 2, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORID ) + +(RP I 6) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 361 SE 9Th t\$NE, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(RP17) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 1198 N. OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(RP 18) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 1299 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(RN 9) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 151 EAST 58 STREET, APARTMENT 42D, NEW YORK, NEW YORK; + +(RP20) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 11 BLUFF -COVE FARM, + +NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND; + +(RP2I ) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 15 BLUFF COVE FARM, NARFtAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND; + +(VV I) 1990 RED FERRARI F40 COUPE, VIN: ZFFMN34A5L0087066; + +(VV2) 2009 CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCBDR33W29C059672; + +(VV3) 2008 YELLow McLAREN MERCEDES BENZ SLR, VIN: WDDAK76F98M001788; (VV4) 2007 BLACK LIMOUSINE MI EXPEDMON, VIN: I FIFK15557LA59223; + +U s." + +(VV5) 2009 RED FERRARI 430 SPIDER, VIN: ZFFEW59A380163011; + +VIN: SCA I L68557UX23044; 4 AC) (VV6) 2007 SILVER ROLLS ROYCE CONVERTIBLE, + +(VV7) 2006 SILVER HUMMER HI, VIN: I 37PH84396E220665; + +(VV8) 2008 CADILLAC ESCALADE, VIN: IGYEC63858R234458; + +(VV9) 1967 RED CONVERTIBLE C9R, VIN: 1946775104745; + +(VV10) 2009 BLACK BucATTi VEYRON EB 16.4, VIN: VF9SA25C28M79515,04,". + +(VV I 1)2008 BLUE ROLLS ROYCE DROPHEAD CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCA2D68528UX 16071; + +(VV12) 2006 RED FERRARI F430 SPIDER, VIN: rFFEW59A560148863; + +(VV 13) 2008 CHEVROLET CoavErrE, VIN: IGIYY26W485120085, + +(VV 14) 2009 CHEVROLET CORVE I I t Z06, VIN: 1G I Y226E9951 11923; + +(VV 15)2009 BLUE GRAY MASERATI GRANTURISMO COUPE, VIN: ZAMG145A090042326; + +(VV 16) 2009 MERCEDES BENZ, WDBSK71F159F49477; + +(VV17) 2007 8T a HULL # WAR87777B707; + +(VV18) 33' AQUARNA, HULL # XFA33R74G405; + +(VV19) 2009 II' YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL N YAMA366 11809; + +(VV20) 2009 II' YAMAHA VS, HULL if YAMA3626I809; + +(VV2 I )2009 1 P YAMAHA VS, HuU. NYAMA2679G809; + +(VV22) 1999 5Y SEA RAY 540 SUNDANCER, HULL H SERY001899; + +(VV23) 2009 YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL tl YAMA4288K809. + +(VV 24) 2010 LAMBORCHINI LP-670SY, VIN: ZliWBU8AHXALA03837; + +(VV2S) MERCEDES BENZ S65 VR BYTURBO, VIN: WDDEJ79XX8A015189, FLORIDA TAG FIHV490; + +(VV26) 2009 RED BMW CONVERTIBLE, VIN: WBALM53529E160836; + +(VV27) 2009 MERCEDES BENZ SLK 350 CONVERTIBLE, YIN: WDBWIC58F19F190779, 304 4ECES OF JEWELRY; + +1 PONT LIGHTERS; + +'SpECES SPORTS MEMORABILIA; + +\$271,160 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; + +\$1,500 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; + +(T6) \$30,000 IN AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CARDS; + +CO'S + +4 49 + +(T7) \$50,000 IN AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CARDS; + +(T8) 5 ADDITIONAL WATCHES; + +(T9) GUITAR COLLECTION; + +(BA I) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT, IN THE NAME OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY \$1,263,780; + +(BA2) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF WAWW 3 LLC, IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$11 + +(BA3) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNal IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$53,448.51; + +(BA5) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT- 1< r) /49 IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$995,521.426; + +(BA6) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, BANK/` ACCOUNT 178780211819923220000187, IN THE NAME OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$12,000,000; + +(BA4) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT I IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$71,793.06; + +(BA7) BANK POPULAIRE, MO IN THE NAME OF AHNICK KHALID, UP TO THE AMOUNT OF + +(BA8) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF STEVE CAPUT', UP TO THE AMOUNT OF \$1,000,000; + +(BI 1 ) STOCK CERTIFICATES OR BENEFICIAL T IN 50,000 SHARES OF CAPITAL IN GIBRALTAR PRIVATE BANK & TRUST; + +(812) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S Eourre INTEREST IN QTASK; + +(BB) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST N BROWARD BANK OF COMMERCE; + +(B14) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN BOVA RISTORANTE; + +(B15) SCOTT' W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN + +BOVA CUCINA; + +(816) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN BOVA PRIME; + +(B17) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN CAFE IGUANA, PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA; + +(818) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY MEREST IN CART SHIELD USA, LLC; + +(B19) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST TN RENATO WATCHES; + +(B11 0) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN EDIFY LLC; + +(BIII) SCOTT W. Roms-rerN's EQUITY INTEREST IN V GEORGIO VODKA; + +(8112) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EGUrrY INTEREST IN SEA CLUB; + +(B113) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN NORTH STAR MORTGAGE; + +(BI14) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTERE4TI>Se KM, BUNTER MARKETING; + +(B11 5) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN RRA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; + +(BI I 6) SCOTT W. RGINSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN VERSACE MANSION/CASA CASUARINA, INCLUDING I 0 YEAR OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH 2 TEN YEAR OPTIONS; + +(0117) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST, AND LICENSING RIOT-ITS, TN ALTERNATIVE BIOFUEL COMPANY; + +(BB 10 SCOTT W. Rants-run EQUITY INTEREST IN RRA GOAL LINE MANAGEMENT; + +re (8119) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN IRON STREET MANAGEMENT, LLC; + +(8120) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND LOAN TO, AFRICAT EQUITY IG DECIDE; + +(B12 I ) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST TN, AND RENTS DERIVED FROM DUCKY'S BBQ, LOCATED AT I !98 N. OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(8122) Scan W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND RENTS DERIVED FROM THE CAR WASH LOCATED AT 1299 FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA + +(B123) PROMISSORY NOTE BY UNIGLOBE IN FAVOR OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN; + +(B124) ALL EQUITY INTEREST HELD BY OR ON BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, IN VARIOUS CORPORATIONS AND ENTITIES; + +(CI) \$6,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO ALEX SINK ;AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES ON BEHALF OF ALEX SINK; + +(C2) \$40,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, "FLORIDA" ACCOUNT AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF F + +(C3) \$10,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, "FEDERAL" ACCOUNT AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C4) \$90,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(CS) \$5,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA BY ROTHSTEIN BUSINESS WITTY KNOWN AS WAWW AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C6) \$800,000 CHARITABLE DONATION TO JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL ADVISED THE UNTIED STATES OF THE DONATION FROM THE ROTHSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION; + +(CT) \$1 ,000,000 CHARITABLE DONATION TO HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL. ADVISED THE UNITED STATES OF THE DONATION FROM THE ROTHSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION; + +Vr + +(O1) S9,600 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO GOVERNOR CHARLIE CRIST AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE OFFICE OF CHARLIE CRIST; + +AND + +(C9) ALL FUNDS VOLUNTARILY TURNED OVER TO THE UNITED STATES (RS/FBI) SINCE. IN OR ABOUT OCTOBER 28, 2009 IN RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY INVOLVING SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +# WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM FOR NON-REAL P4OPEcrIES + +TO: THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS OR ANY OTHER AUTHORIZED FEDERAL LAW EN,OKEMENT OFFICER + +WHEREAS, on November 27, 2009, the United Stales)Mf America filed an Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rcm against e' ve-named defendants, also referred to as "defendant properties," for the violations of law enumerated in said Complaint [DE #19]; and + +WHEREAS, the Court has found that probable cause exists that the defendants are subject to forfeiture; + +NOW THEFtE.FORICTeuYre ) hereby commanded to take the defendants into your possession for safe the character or situation of the property is such that the taking of actual possession itpracticable, you shall execute this process by affixing a copy thereof to the in a conspicuous place and/or by leaving a copy of the Amended Verified Complaint and proctivith the person having possession or his agent. + +YOU ARE FURTHER commanded to cite and admonish the owner and/or possessor of the defendants, and any person or firm known to claim any interest therein, to file in the United States District Court, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128-7788, within thirty (35) days + +following receipt of this Warrant, a Verified Claim in accordance with Rule G(5), Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, and to therewith or within twenty (20) days thereafter file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Verified Complaint, a copy of which Complaint you shall supply with this Warrant, and to serve copies of said Claim and Answer upon the United States Attorney, 99 NE 4th Street, Miami, Florida 33132, Attention: **Alison W. Lehr**, Assistant United States Attorney, and that upon failure of the owner, possessor or any party claiming an interest in the defendant properties to do so, that the defendant properties may then be forfeited to the United States by default and without further notice or hearing. + +**AND YOU ARE FURTHER** commanded to make due and prompt return of this Warrant to this Court upon its execution. + +WITNESS THE HONORABLE + +![]()WILLIAM J. ZLOCH +UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE + +DATE: 12/12/09 + +STEVEN LARIMORE, CLERK +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +![]() + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.201 + +Case No 50 2009CA040800)OOOCMB AO + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff; + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. MEI individually, and L.M., individually, + +CCP)<\*/ + +Defendants. + +# BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SNO R PROTECTIVE ORDER + +Pursuant to Rule 1.410, H ".\_ • trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A., files this Motion for Protective Order and states: + +- 1. On November 10, 2009, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") was put into involuntary bankruptcy. That case is pending as In Re Estate of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A., On November 20, 2009, Herbert Stettin was appointed Trustee of RRA. On November 30, 2009, an Order for Relief was entered by this Court. +- 2. On April 16, 2010, Plaintiff caused a subpoena duces tecum to be served on the Trustee for production of documents. A copy of the subpoena duces tecum is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 3 . The Trustee's responsibility under the involuntary bankruptcy filing is to winddown the business affairs of RRA. In that regard, the Trustee has three (3) people in his employ + +![](_page_19_Picture_14.jpeg) + +and has various professionals whose employment have been approved by the United States Bankruptcy County. + +4 . Additionally, Scott Rothstein, who apparently managed the affairs of the law firm, has been criminally charged by the United States of America with various violations of federal law to which he has pled guilty. Associated with those charges, the United States of America seized the law firm's bank accounts. See Exhibit B annexed hereto. + +5. Consequently, the very limited financial resources are \*Irlevoted to trying to bring money into the estate as opposed to expending money on unrelated mud party litigation, such as this one. + +6. While the Trustee has indicated in a differed[ t his willingness to try to produce to Mr. Epstein the documents he needs, in tar\_ the Trustee's responsibility for '4. winding-up the affairs of the Estate is not • and because of the limited finances available 7 to the Trustee, he requests that the Court order ultall costs associated with responding to Mr. Epstein's subpoena duces tecum be borne by Mr. Epstein and that at least 50% of the estimated costs be paid to the Trustakuiri to any responsibility for undertaking a search for the documents. + +7. TritatdE also requests that the time for responding to the subpoena duces tecum be o until such time as this Court or Mr. Epstein and the Trustee arc able to resolve the issues raised in this Motion for Protective Order. + +Wherefore, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee requests this Court to grant this motion. + +Respectfully submitted, + +BERGER SINGERMAN +Counsel for the Trustee +200 S. Biscayne Blvd. +Tenth Floor +Miami, Florida 33131 +305.755.9500 +305.714.4340 (facsimile) + +By: + +![]()**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail and facsimile on Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr., 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach Fl; Mr. Marc Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; Mr. Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL; Mr. Gary [REDACTED], 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Mr. Jack Goldberger, 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 this [REDACTED] day of May, 2010. + +![]()IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER** + +COMES NOW L.M., by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c), and hereby files this Motion for Protective Order regarding the documents and information sought by Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein in the Deposition Duces Tecum served on Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA, ("RRA"), and as grounds states as follows: + +1. 1. L.M. is one of many victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation; as such, her civil lawsuit against Epstein is currently active and pending. +2. 2. L.M. was represented by attorneys at RRA prior to the collapse of that firm. +3. 3. Epstein served a deposition duces tecum on Herbert Stettin, trustee for RRA, requesting documents and information that are clearly protected by attorney- + +![](_page_22_Picture_22.jpeg) + +client and work product privilege. (See Exhibit A, depo duces tecum served on Herbert Stettin as RRA trustee). + +- 4. Epstein is attempting to use his lawsuit against L.M. as a vehicle to pierce the attorney client and work product privilege and gain access pr privileged information related to L.M.'s civil action against him. +- 5. Epstein served Requests for Production on Brad , L.M.'s attomey, who Epstein also named as a Defendant in the instant action; that discovery requests identical information to that souQM ¢ythe Duces Tecum served on Herbert Stettin. +- 6. Appropriate work-product and attorney-client privilege objections were made to those requests. (See Exhibit hltsgpsr tein's requests for Production to Brad and answers thereto). +- 7. The trustee for RVect iively standing in the shoes of the former RRA attorneys and clients on issues such as this, and thus Epstein cannot request discovery fro RRA trustee to circumvent the privilege. +- 8. The discovery Epstein is seeking should not be allowed as it is clearly protected by privilege. + +WHEREFORE, L.M. and her counsel respectfully move this Court to enter an Order of protection preventing Epstein from obtaining the discovery he is seeking in his Subpoena Duces Tecum to Herbert Stettin. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via U.S. Mail and email to all counsel on the attached list on June )2 • 2010. + +> Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL , 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax Atto e Defendant LM. + ++o + +Gary rmer, Jr. Florida r No.: 914444 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Protective Order + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant, Bradley +[REDACTED] + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION - DOCUMENTS ONLY + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Roth [REDACTED] Rosenfeldt Adler, PA +C/O James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. +Berger Singerman, P.A. +200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 +Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Prose Court Reporting, 101 NE 3rd Avenue, +Suite #1500, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, on May 19, 2010, 4:00 p.m., bring with you the +following: + +See attached Exhibit A + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless +excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as +directed. + +DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. + +![]()BY: + +![]()ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. +(Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +561-842-2820 + +![](_page_26_Picture_175.jpeg) + +APR 14 + +# EXHIBIT A + +# DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copy ot otherwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, Interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordingsNotion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and ay 7 recordings), including the file and file cover. + +The term "Document" also means any and all computer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, + +microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff" means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey EpstelikPalm Beach County Case #502008CA028051)OOaMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane DOIjjane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who Is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +D. 'RRA' means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +E. 'Money' means any tangible thing of value. + +F. ?tints" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriff's ogler necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court repokless charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, photocopies, faxes. Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +If you are unable to identify each Plaintiff, please contact Robert D Critton, Jr at their names will be provided pursuant to a confidentiality agreement + +G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +### DUCES TECUM2 + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +1. a. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; +2. b. Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; +3. c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +4. d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +5. e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; +6. f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +1. a. Any Plaintiff and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] or any entity with which he has been associated; +2. b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. + +3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and [REDACTED] Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, [REDACTED] or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +--- + +2 Due to the potential volume of documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special [REDACTED] and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- c. 0. 11j. +- b. +- a. . Fill +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epsteirj. + +r W. Rothstein and/or any other attomey or investor relating 6. All fee sharing to ny aspect of any Plaintiff's case. agreements between J. Ill t i?A, or Scott r ! + +J. cuments made available to any investor or potential investor by , RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors' for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing payment of any bill or cost in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' cases were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions) + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attomeys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attomeys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attomeys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents related to the amount of Costs that were incurred by RRA in ds representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. and is claiming or has daimed + +18. All documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jeffrey Epstein. + +19. All documents which purport to mention any transfer of funders or property from Jeffrey Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Jef.4atein. + +20. All documents relating to any investment, joint-venture or business enterprise involving RRA, Rothstein or a Rothstein-related entity that reference any claim (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +21. All emails exchanged between any of the following ind vlduals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: + +- a. S Rothstein +- b. Adler +- c. lam Berger +- d. Michael Fisten +- e. Kenneth Jenne +- f. David B +- g. Deborah +- h. Andrew arne +- i. Rocberts +- j. t ard (Rick) Fandry +- k. Christina Kitterman +- I. Brad + +22. All documents related to or referendng potentie' deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +- 23. All Q-Task 'Projects- that refer to Jeffrey Epstein. + +- 24. All Q-Task Projects that refer to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +25. All documents that identify all individuals who were granted access (invited guests) or who had access to the O-Task Projects referred to in request nos. 23 and 24. + +28. All documents, communications and letters sent by you assessing liens against the recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v, Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARla + +27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as bankruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases against Epstein. This includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is claiming. + +28. nt agreements or letters describing compensation and benefits for during his employment with RRA. + +29. All documents from the 74114/tress" software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +30. All documents frptlkt J6ttress" software program that refer or relate to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. ) + +31. For the time period April 1, 2009 through November 5, 2009, all emails to and from any employee, partner, shareholder, attorney, agent or client of RRA that reference any of the following: + +- a. A.J. DiScala; +- b. D3 Capital Club. LLC +- c. Bill Clinton; +- d. Alan Dershowitz; +- e. David Copperfleld; +- f. Kevin Spacey; +- g. Chris Tucker, +- h. Prince Andrew +- i. Jean-Luc Brunel; +- j. Tom II ; +- k. Bill +- I. Donald rump. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. Plaintiff, + +J. individually, ar7L7rirdividually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800X)=MB AG + +# EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUC + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN rEpstein to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, requests that Defendant, J. ), produce or make available for inspection documents responsive to the requests below within thirty (30) days from the date of service: DEER( ri NS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. 'Document" meant,K y written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, includiric. s ot limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples + +![](_page_33_Picture_11.jpeg) + +etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and ..) recordings), and including the file and file cover. c.i .. + +The term "Document' also means any and all mputer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever whether printed out or c idi stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, her S s:Nave, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, external memory stick, software, or a any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloqulafism, cussion, conversation or agreement. + +Ttaintiff means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051)COCXMa), E.W. {E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #50200SCA028058XXXXPAB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jaffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-fnarra/ ), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not + +- e. Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs In litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; Communication between third party Investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against + +yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +- D. -RRA° means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +- E. °Money-means any tangible thing of value. + +F. °Costs° include, but are not limited to, court costs, Sling fees, Sheriff's service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices of subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or kw, Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, investigative bills, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, ayCvji ess fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +- G. °Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +# REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION' + +1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: + +Due to the potential yogi documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +Jeffrey Epstein; + +- f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +- a. Any Plaintiff and J. has been associated; +- b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA or any entity with which he + +All ails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between J. , Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger andjMS Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or thir c: pa (person or entity) regarding Jeffregiitriidriihich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +. ails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between J. , Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorraL9r representative of RRA regarding e e hich mentions Jeffrey Ep (including Mike %ten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Far\*eyk + +V 5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. Ia. Rothstein +- b. J. Edwards +- c. +- e. any entity' fohectSby RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create InvestmerRippo um es for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein + +6. All fee sharing agreements between J. RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or inves or re ating o any aspect of any Plaintiffs case. + +7. Al documents made available to any investor or potential investor by Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing the Costs and payment of any bill or Costs in each Plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents received by you or your current firm wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which pufported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +14. All intercepted phone conversations au thorady RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are saved or stored in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any othe. electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired ic mail (e-mails) to or from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepteror'icquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents supporting the contention that a sexual assault took place on an airplane purportedly owned by Jeffrey Epstein or a Jeffrey Epstein entity at any time between 1998 and 2005. + +18. All documents related to the amount of all Costs that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. + +19. All documents setting forth to the amount of Costs were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. during the time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). + +20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hatele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: + +What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein - at least dating back as far as our investigation resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. + +Were not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children, and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls." + +(A) Provide all documents to support this assertion including any documents which are the source of the informs + +21. All documents related to or mentioning potential deponents In the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +22. All documents that support your claim of dam In your counterclaim in this case. + +23. The written fee agreement with the Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you in this case. + +24. All ernails exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or a similar reference was mentioned: + +- a, +- b. +- C. TT !Um Berger +- d. Michael Fisten e , Kenneth Jenne fs David Bolt. ) othstein Adler c5 Deborah ,. chard (Rick) Fandrey + - k. Christina Kitterman. + +25. A copy of your RRA business card. + +26. Any employment agreements, letter agreements or memos given to you by RRA or a representative or agent of RRA describing your compensation and benefits at RRA. + +27. All documents and communications from Herbert Stettin, as bankruptcy Trustee for RRA, asserting liens against recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] + +Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of April, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED] Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos +& Lehman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 - fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant Bradley Edwards + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 253-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XJOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +T I in ividually, J. , individually, and . indiv ua , + +/ + +Defendant. + +DEFENDANT J. EDWARDS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST IM PIRODUCTION DATED APRIL 12, 2010 + +Defendant, J. EDWARDS, hereby files his Response to Request for + +Production propounded by Plaintiff on April 12, 2010 as follows: + +- 1. None. +- 2. a. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + - b. None. +- 3. Objection as to communications to or from investigators as that is protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. +- 4. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. +- 5. None. +- 6. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any Investor. + +- 11. None. +- 12. None. < < S42 ) +- 13. None. +- 14. None. +- 15. None. ( S \ +- 16. None. +- 17. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, ambiguous. +- 18. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. +- 7. None. +- 8. None. +- 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence. +- 10. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calcine OM to the ) discovery of admissible evidence. C +- 19. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and protected by the work-product privilege. +- 20. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege. +- 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege. +- 22. Not yet determined. + +No.: 502000CACL40800XXYJGABAG Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +- 23. Objection. +- 24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege. +- 25. None in Defendant's possession. +- 26. None. +- 27. None in Defendant's possession. + +CO g + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via 1FAX AUD U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on April 11th, 2010. + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. +Attorneys for Defendant, Bradley Edwards +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9461 + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e13c13db3ff01b3dab4048420715e3f30157361 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/EFTA02759876.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2268 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 44, + "chars": 63397, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.08, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_168.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_19_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_22_Picture_22.jpeg", + "_page_26_Picture_175.jpeg", + "_page_33_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.972, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 518.736, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 518.736, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 279.972, + 110.16000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.236, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 536.9159999999999, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 536.9159999999999, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 64.236, + 384.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 382.38599999999997, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 382.38599999999997, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 82.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.486, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 496.31399999999996, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 496.31399999999996, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 291.486, + 122.30999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION \u2013 DOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.108, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 481.164, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 481.164, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 132.108, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.64, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 327.8148498535156, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 327.8148498535156, + 97.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 266.64, + 97.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.586, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 394.4817810058594, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 394.4817810058594, + 124.43701171875 + ], + [ + 200.586, + 124.43701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.126, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 346.02599999999995, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 346.02599999999995, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 255.126, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 379.1690368652344, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 379.1690368652344, + 117.089111328125 + ], + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 117.089111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM FOR NON-REAL P4OPEcrIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.92600000000002, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 464.40863037109375, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 464.40863037109375, + 286.7285461425781 + ], + [ + 133.92600000000002, + 286.7285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.27599999999995, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 510.621826171875, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 510.621826171875, + 129.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 283.27599999999995, + 129.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SNO R PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.83999999999997, + 341.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 480.1883544921875, + 341.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 480.1883544921875, + 404.1272888183594 + ], + [ + 126.83999999999997, + 404.1272888183594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.665, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 379.94, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 379.94, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 225.665, + 324.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.644, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 529.708, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 529.708, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 308.644, + 133.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.548, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 403.472, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 403.472, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 203.548, + 382.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.312, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 383.7696228027344, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 383.7696228027344, + 148.447021484375 + ], + [ + 228.312, + 148.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.695, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 367.235, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 367.235, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 277.695, + 149.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 294.14799999999997, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 491.0519999999999, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 491.0519999999999, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 294.14799999999997, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION - DOCUMENTS ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.92, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 472.932, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 472.932, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 138.92, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.09000000000003, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 335.51849365234375, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 335.51849365234375, + 111.945556640625 + ], + [ + 277.09000000000003, + 111.945556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.565, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 399.58697509765625, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 399.58697509765625, + 136.70556640625 + ], + [ + 213.565, + 136.70556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.512, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.092, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.092, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 258.512, + 136.89000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.65, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 320.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 166.65, + 320.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.464, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 392.08200000000005, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 392.08200000000005, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 208.464, + 441.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 383.54962158203125, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 383.54962158203125, + 409.3255615234375 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 409.3255615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.67199999999997, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 361.782, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 361.782, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 249.67199999999997, + 196.82999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.242, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 516.3056640625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 516.3056640625, + 153.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 307.242, + 153.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.704, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 378.144, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 378.144, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 232.704, + 168.48 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759876" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ff170799397a15a74dcdda6fa50868c7d2bb097 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_10_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3aec9f485eaf0211a5075d4c9fbb48171b08635683fd3ed3a31a9633f349bc4c +size 7777 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_19_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_19_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c195eda3a88da7d03d16f8fb3244d9509de122 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_19_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:087ef610b39401b11973616f748f17229e452beadb721765dce5dc641fbd868a +size 7619 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_22_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_22_Picture_22.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0d5c971976331d2bcb060ee1c3fda1fe75fd725 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_22_Picture_22.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:34c2b067b60063980c7ae8df2f029fc9d016a2b8df1c9055c43b28b183a51e2a +size 7181 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_26_Picture_175.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_26_Picture_175.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be044234d474ad5bab134df0414c32bb3a66c375 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_26_Picture_175.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ec30bd15ed098858b7848f7cc68aa42906a8e3e8de029fd22c537eaf59a2750c +size 4563 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_33_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_33_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f2f21635f3a12220460ec10e9fea02762457a72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_33_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8490951a6a1f21468fcbc062078bb7d07ed1fed76c2725ba1ee8f30a49e5336c +size 6180 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_3_Picture_168.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_3_Picture_168.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2ab80ef8e355df11cbc6a5df5e264043f6c1dc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759876/_page_3_Picture_168.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:578f6479d3b81e308cb2b06ec5c662606dd4980e0eb709ba600c976c5b6c2022 +size 6993 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e1dde64832f01830bbe79dbe075c8817fc91208 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. CROSS-NOTICE OF HEARING BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +TO: All parties on the attached Service List + +-n F in + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that this matter has been set for hearing before the Honorable David F. =, on June t .,2010 at 8:45 a.m., at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Hightia.Y. m 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, the following motion: + +I hereby certify that I have made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this motion for hearing. + +BERGER SiNGERMAN + +Attorneys for Trustee + +350 East Las Olas Boulevard — Suite 1000 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Telephone: (954) 525-9900 + +Direct: (954) 712-5138 + +Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 + +cc: Judicial Assistant + +By: + +Charlts H. Lic114man, Esq. Honda Bar No. 501050 CLichtman@bergersinggrmatt.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVI + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and corred co4 foregoing was served by U.S. Mail and facsimile on Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr., Burm Critton Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL; Mr. Marc Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 3301. Mr. Jack Scarola 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL; Mr. Gary ~, Esq., ffl Jaffe Weissing, et al., 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fon Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Mr. Jack Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and to Rodney Janis, Esq., =, Bumett, P.A., Point, West Tower, 777 S. Flagler Dr., Ste 901, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 this 24th day of June, 2010. + +By + +i?SNth If you are a person w a dbability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entilled, at no cosi to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contad Nicole Saunders, ADA Coordinator in the Administrative Office of the Court, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 within two (2) working days of your receipt of this Notice of Hearing; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 1-800-955- 8771. + +Charles H. ichtman, Esq. + +Si Usted es una persona incapacitada que necesita de un servicio especial para participar en este proceso, Usted tiene derecho a que le provean cierta ayuda sin costo alguno. Por favor pongase en contacto con el Coordinador de la Oficina Administrativa de la Corte ADA, situada en el 205 North Dixie Highway, Oficina 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, teléfono (561) 3554380, dentro de los dos (2) próximos dias hábiles después de recibir esta Notice of Hearing; si tiene incapacidad de oir 6 hablar llame al 1-800-955-8771. + +Si ou sé yon moun ki Infim, ki bézwen nimpôt akomodasyon pou ka patisipé nan pwosè sa-a, ou gen dwa, san'l pa kouté'w anyin, pou yo ba'w kèk sèvis. Tampri kontakté koôdinatè ADA ya nan Biro Administratif Tribinal nan cité Palm Beach la, ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, Cham 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, niméro téléfonn-nan sé (561) 355-4380, rélé dé (2) jou dé lè ou résévwa Notice of Hearing; si ou bèbè ou byen soud rélé 1-800-955-8771. + +Si vous êtes infirme, et en besoin de n'importe accommodation pour pouvoir participer à ces procédures, vous pouvez gratuitement recevoir certains services. S'il vous plait contactez le coordinateur du Bureau Administratif du Tribunal de Palm Beach, située à 205 North Dixie Highway, Chambre 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, numéro de téléphone (561) 355-4380 durant deux (2) jours suivant la réception de Notice of Hearing; si vous êtes muets ou sourds, appelez 1-800-955-87 + +2888905-1 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0748f772534482e6293a16ff2b50edf2b0d97963 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920/EFTA02759920.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759920.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3958, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.315, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 536.067, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 536.067, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 63.315, + 494.90999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.07999999999998, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 379.89, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 379.89, + 319.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 217.07999999999998, + 319.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759920" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2253fe414392db32e83851a26820373e16b645c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +FILED +10 JUN 25 PM 3:11 +PALM BEACH BOOK, CLERK +CIRCUIT COUNTY, FL +CIVIL 4 + +NOTICE OF JOINDER + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. [REDACTED], hereby gives notice of his joinder in the Motion for Protective Order filed on behalf of the Defendant, L.M. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 25th day of June, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Joinder Page 2 of 2 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Fistos & + +Burnett, P.A. 777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 c"ser Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik jfr. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +tsA + +Co \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4dae3730a2129a10af1b7bf7f7cba38e5f97123 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923/EFTA02759923.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759923.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1784, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF JOINDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 349.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.54299999999995, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 365.99090576171875, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 365.99090576171875, + 143.478515625 + ], + [ + 272.54299999999995, + 143.478515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759923" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c67933eb32d5434740c4c79d1d0b9bac94d59b97 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.md @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800YOOCXMBAG + +## EXHIBIT LIST OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLNNTIFF. + +COMES NOW the Defendant./Counterplaintiff, by cn gated attCheys and hereby + +lists his exhibits for trial as follows: + +O 0 ' te) + +| PLF. DATE DEF. | | +|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARKED ADMITTED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT§.EXPECTED TO BE USED | +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | +| 3. | All applicable Rules of Evidence | +| 4. | Video of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's home and route from Plaintiff to Defendant's home | +| | tt °151r | +| ( S | Owners" Non-Prosecution Agreement | +| 7. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | +| 8. | Messages taken from message pads found at Defendant's home | +| 9. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | +| 10 | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | +| II. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | +| 12. | phone records | + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARKED | ADMITTED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|--------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 13. | | | | Jail Visitation Logs | +| | 14. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | +| | 15. | | | | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 16. | | | | All evidence, information and documents taken or possessed by FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 17. | | | | Plaintiffs and other victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 18. | | | | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed | +| | 19. | | | | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 20. | | | | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | +| | 21. | | | | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any and all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | +| | 22. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | +| | 23. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | +| | 24. | | | | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 25. | | | | All documents evidencing relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Jean Luc Brunel | +| | 26. | | | | All documents evidencing relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 or any modeling agencies | +| | 27. | | | | Yearbooks of plaintiff, Jane Doe | +| | 28. | | | | 2002 █████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | +| | 29. | | | | 2001 █████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | +| | 30. | | | | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | +| | 31. | | | | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 32. | | | | Tape recording or transcript of recording of conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and █████ Rush | +| | 33. | | | | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | +| | 34. | | | | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 35. | | | | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | +| | 36. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | +| | 37. | | | | Public records from the Department of Corrections related to Jeffrey Epstein | + +| DEF. PLS. DATE | | +|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARKED ADMITTED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 38. | Records from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement related to Jeffrey Epstein All statements made by Jeffrey Epstein | +| 40 | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | +| 41. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, 80802, 09-81092 | +| 42. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter 09-81092 | +| 43. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | +| 44. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein was a plaintiff or defendant | +| 45. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses A09-80802,09-81092 Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB r/C<) | +| 47. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses No. 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG | +| 48. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 49. | Report and Analysis ofJeffrey Epstein's assets | +| 50. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | +| 51. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes | +| 52. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and Audio tape of | +| 54. | Photographs, videos and books taken in the search warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| 55. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | + +| DEF. PLF. | DATE | | +|-----------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | OFFERED MARKED ADMITTED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 57 | | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Plaintiff | +| 58 | | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06 | +| 59. | | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 60. | | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 61. | | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs | +| 62 | | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | +| 63. | | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project | +| 64. | | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns | +| 65. | | MC2 emails involving, communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant | +| 66. | | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | +| 67. | | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | +| | ,-- - I_ | Massage Table | +| 69 | c 14/ ~f | Lotions taken from Jeffrey Epstein's home during search warrant Computers taken from Jeffrey Epstein's home during search | +| 70 | hn) | warrant Vibrators, dildos and other sex toys taken from Jeffrey Epstein's home during search warrant | +| | IC IIIIIIV | | +| 72. | r ilicS | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | +| 73. | 14/ ) + | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | +| 74. | | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community Control and Probation | +| 75. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registration | +| 76. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | +| 77. | | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | +| 78 | | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | +| 79 | | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | +|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED MARKED ADMITTED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 80 | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein | +| 82. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1.-I 1- | +| 83. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13- | +| 85. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State--Attorney dated 4-6- | +| | -,, 06 ii '',. , / | +| 87. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 | +| 88. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | +| 89. | Documents related `to the rental of a vehicle for | +| 90 | Ted's Sheds Documents | +| 9 I. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties | +| 92 | Arrest Warrant of | +| / | Police report regarding picking up money dated 11-28-04 List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | +| 95. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | +| /- | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17.06 | +| 97. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | +| 98 | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | +| 99. | Jeffrey Epstein Polygraph Test and Results Plaintiff's GED testing information and results | +| 101 | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | +| 103. | Flight information for Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | | +|----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARKED ADMITTED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 105. | | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes | +| 106 | | Pleadings of Jane Doe I and 2 v. US case | +| 107 | | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech | +| 108. | | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06 | +| 109. | | Jail receipts of Jeffrey Epstein Police Report dated 1628, - \ | +| III. | | Compulsory Medial Examination orvietim, CMA | +| 112 | | Plaintiff's school records and transcripts | +| 113. | | Victim Notification letter dated 7-9-08 | +| 114 | | Plaintiff's employment, records from IHOP | +| 115. | | Police report ofJuan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| 116. | | Plaintiff's Medical Records from Milton Girls Juvenile Facility | +| 117. | | Plaintiff's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | +| 118. | Aiv! | | +| 119. | i `,/ | Plaintiff's Medical Records from St. Mary's Medical Center | +| | | Plaintiffs Plaintiff's Medical Records from United Health Epstein's home | +| ii | | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 123. T‘i,741/7 | | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists | +| 124. | | All items taken in the execution of the search warrant of Jeffrey | +| 125 | | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 126 | | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | +| 127. | | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey | +| 128 | | Photographs of all persons listed on Plaintiff's Witness List | +| 129. | | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and | + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | +|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARKED ADMITTED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS exhibits thereto | +| 130. | Any and all expert wimess reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause | +| 131 | Curriculum vitaes of any and all listed experts | +| 132 | Curriculum vitae of Dr. Ryan | +| 133. | Any articles or publications of Dr. Ryan | +| 134. | Any articles or publications of Dr. Richard | +| 135. | Any articles or publications of Dr. L. Dennison | +| 136. | All items and documentation review by Dr. L. Dennison Transcript and video (DVD) of INfE of Plaintiff | +| | All cxhibits to Dr: L.-Dennison Deposition I | +| | All exhibits fo Dr. Richard Deposition | +| 140. | All iteinsand documents reviewed by Dr. Richard | +| 141 | All items and documents reviewed by Dr. Ryan Al)exhibits listed on the Defendant's Exhibit List | +| | D aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, emonstrative ') Any and all mortality tables | +| | lici734/ 1v | +| — | Plaintiffs reserve all objections to Defendant's Exhibits | +| 146. | Plaintiffs reserve the right to supplement and/or amend this Exhibit List | +| 147. | By listing an Exhibit, Plaintiff is not waiving their right to object | + +Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this list. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 30th day of June, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c8e746115003faa751d0fa0177b9112ace92aed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925/EFTA02759925.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759925.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 24646, + "elapsed_seconds": 85.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT LIST OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLNNTIFF.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.89600000000002, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 369.8639831542969, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 369.8639831542969, + 228.60614013671875 + ], + [ + 139.89600000000002, + 228.60614013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.28999999999996, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.12199999999996, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 346.12199999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 259.28999999999996, + 72.9 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759925" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28227b51826c1e466196250ef36c242b62b749fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +**WITNESS LIST OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]** + +COMES NOW the Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned attorneys, and hereby lists non-expert witnesses for trial as follows: + +1. 1. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +2. 2. All attorneys currently prosecuting claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims. +3. 3. All other named victims. +4. 4. All witnesses listed by the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Co-Defendant. +5. 5. All experts named by the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Co-Defendant. +6. 6. Any and all witnesses listed in the Answers to Interrogatories, Responses to Requests for Production, Responses to Requests for Admissions, identified in deposition and/or exhibits thereto (however, by listing these witnesses, Defendant/Counterplaintiff does not waive any objections to their testimony at trial if offered by Plaintiff/Counterdefendant). +7. 7. Impeachment and rebuttal witnesses as necessary, without waiving any objections thereto. + +2010 JUN 30 PM 3:50 +PALM BEACH COUNTY +JEFFREY EPSTEIN +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al +Witness List +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff reserves the right to amend this list prior to trial upon proper notice to the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail on this 307 day of June, 2010 to all counsel on the attached list. + +![]()Epstein v. Rothstein, et al Witness List Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Roth One E Broward Blvd., Suik 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +S[ inn Esquire Burnett, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +cos \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1ef50bf1c2fe5dd123b3db8d476a56e01b0d688 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934/EFTA02759934.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759934.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2570, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS LIST OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.805, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 69.805, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.582, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 352.61181640625, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 352.61181640625, + 185.30853271484375 + ], + [ + 258.582, + 185.30853271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759934" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..effb51ddc997de055acb6d2700a041604c1e6f86 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.md @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: .502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## AMENDED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 3, 2017 AND/OR EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS RELATED TO COLLATERAL OUASI-C INAL CASES + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff B J. wards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Res Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Con ue Tearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 and/or Extend Time to File Motions Related t l tZt1Jiateral Quasi-Criminal Cases, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +## Summary + +In\2009, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed suit against attorney J. , alleging that Mr. had fabricated certain civil claims arising from Epstein's systematic sexual abuse of minor female children as part of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme that was running with Scott Rothstein and one of clients, LM. At the time Epstein filed suit, the validity of Epstein's criminal plea deal was being challenged by + +United On September 25, ess than three months before trial, Epstein filed the underlying Motion to Contint (S ,indicated that he would be moving to stay these proceedings until Doe v. resolved. Thus, after assuming the burden of proof for three years, Ep to now claims that he cannot defend this case and will "be forced to invoke his Fifth Amendment privileges" as a result of the prior-filed 2008 Crime Victim Rights Act proceeding. Epstein's desperate, last-ditch effort to avoid a trial on the merits should be rejected. Epstein filed the underlying action forming the basis of Mr. malicious prosecution claim after the Doe v. United States proceeding had been pending for over a year. Epstein's Amended + +IM adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 2 of 8 + +his minor child victims in Doe v. United States, case no. 08-cv-80736-KAM. For the next three (3) years, Epstein nonetheless pursued his claims against Mr. never once suggesting a stay of this case was in order, and carrying the burden of proof with full knowledge of that pending Crime Victim Rights Act proceeding. In fact, Epstein even cited the l hl States case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the F eccral [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." wherein he flit "invalidating the + +In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claim a scheduled summary judgment hearing. Mr. Edw assert a claim for malicious prosecution, alle suit in the first place. The allegations horrific nature of Epstein's condu to fabricate his clients' claims. only days before lately amended his counterclaim to tein had no probable cause to initiate this 't Epstein by were in fact true, and the wards's clients obviated any need for Mr. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 3 of 8 + +Complaint explicitly recognized that one of the potential outcomes of that proceeding was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." To now suggest, on the eve of trial, that this case should be stayed indefinitely pending resolution of that proceedin s belied by common sense and is an affront to Mr. S right to a timely trial on er Epstein initiated this litigation. He asserted that the claims being pursued by Mr. clients were false and fabricated. After eight long years, the time has f ally me for a jury to determine whether Epstein had any basis for these alleg. and Epstein is barred from using a prior-filed 2008 proceeding to avoid that determi pstein pled guilty when asked by the State trial court about the criminal allegatio sn Yhim; he was deposed in multiple civil cases arising out of the same criminal co ct n every occasion, he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-inc ' io e then filed this action knowing that he would continue to invoke the protecti ifth Amendment—which is exactly what he has consistently done. Having chos o t tart this war, he cannot now try to avoid the consequences of his choice. + +## Memorandum of Law + +a. Waiver 0 ver is the intentional or voluntary relinquishment of a known right or conduct which warrants an inference of the relinquishment of a known right." Aberdeen Golf & Country Club v. Bliss Const.. Inc., 932 So. 2d 235, 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The elements of waiver are: (1) the existence at the time of the waiver of a right privilege, advantage or benefit which may be waived; + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 4 of 8 + +(2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v. Bluff Ins. Agency. Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). + +Epstein clearly waived any argument that the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding impeded his defense of Mr. ' malicious prosecution claim when he filed this underlying action in 2009, over a year after Doe was first initiated. Moreover, Epstein directly cite\_ to \_referenced the pending Doe v. United States proceeding in his Amended Complaint pril 12, 2011: + +. . . Instead, the purpose of requesting those records w' .tain them for use in a separately filed Criminal Victims Rights Act (CVRA)-su e Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra, , whitt was brought for several purposes, including invalidating the INon-Prosecutionf Agreement... + +Amended Complaint at paragraph 29(4) (ern :1.4aded). + +Epstein therefore not only that •oe v. United States was pending, but he acknowledged to this Court way b that one of the potential outcomes of that proceeding was the invalidation of his plea ertainly, if Epstein intended to rely on this fact to stay or delay this proceeding, the!libtto raise it was (at the very latest) April 12, 2011, when Epstein filed that Amended Couitiltu. He failed to do so, and instead chose to prosecute his underlying claims for another = defend against Mr. ' malicious prosecution claim for five more years. That act reipation serves to waive any argument that the Doe v. United States proceeding justifies an indefinite stay of this case. C.f. v. Shield, 41 So. 3d 931, 033 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (stating that, in the context of arbitration, a party's "active participation in litigation" serves to waive the right to arbitration). + +# b. Equitable Estoppel + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 5 of 8 + +Epstein's attempt to stay this case is also bared by the doctrine of equitable estoppel, which has been a fundamental principle of American jurisprudence for centuries. Florida Dent. of Health & Rehab. Services v. S.A.P., 835 So. 2d 1091, 1096 (Fla. 2002). Equitable estoppel is "based on principals of fair play and essential justice [that] arises when one y Iutls another party into a disadvantageous legal position." Buell° v. Workman, 20 Soc-31%9 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The elements of equitable estoppel are: (1) a representadon as to- a material fact that is contrary to a later-asserted position, (2) reliance on that r ntation, and (3) a change in position detrimental to the party claiming estoppel, catr yLb llie representation and reliance thereon. Id. + +It is difficult to imagine a more cle ut ttTiple of equitable estoppel than Epstein's eleventh-hour attempt to indefinitely s tigat on that he started, based on a situation that he created. Epstein filed suit, repre is Court and Mr. that he intended to prove that Mr. had fabricate to abuse allegations against him. Epstein did so with full knowledge of the pendin . United States proceeding and while recognizing the possibility that his Non-Pro on Agreement could be invalidated. + +Mr i was forced to defend against these allegations for three (3) years, in reliance on Epste Wepresentations. After Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims, Mr. then spent the next five (5) years pursing his malicious prosecution claim, which required Epstein to put forth at least some evidence that the allegations asserted in the underlying complaint were true: Mr. M' clients had in fact pursued false sexual abuse claims against Epstein. Mr. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 6 of 8 + +has therefore expended substantial time and resources in this litigation in reliance on Epstein's representation that Epstein had probable cause to pursue his claims in the first place. + +Now, on the eve of trial, Epstein has changed tactics and asserted a new position: he cannot defend against the malicious prosecution claims because of the 2008 Doe v. United es eeding, which was filed before Epstein initiated this litigation. If that is true, ho ein intend to prove his claims against Mr. in the first place? Certainly, em could not defend begin with. Simply put, Epstein's eleventh-hour attempt t i ,al due to circumstances that against a malicious prosecution claim, then he should never jc led the underlying action to he created is unavailing and should be rejected principles of equitable estoppel. + +7^ + +## Conclusion + +Based upon the foregoing.'fr e ant/Counter-Plaintiff l J. respectfully ( submits that Jeffrey Epstein's Aalitivi to Continue and request for an eleventh-hour stay of this case should be denied. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 7 of 8 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 25th day of Sept., 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Amended Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 8 of 8 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3339dea295f8b6df3486728474f2828f27a99c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937/EFTA02759937.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,457 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759937.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 12160, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 116.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 116.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 3, 2017 \nAND/OR EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS RELATED TO COLLATERAL \nOUASI-C INAL CASES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 337.416 + ], + [ + 537.9884033203125, + 337.416 + ], + [ + 537.9884033203125, + 402.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 402.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 555.744 + ], + [ + 330.57830810546875, + 555.744 + ], + [ + 330.57830810546875, + 570.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 570.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Memorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 380.42059326171875, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 380.42059326171875, + 534.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 534.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 546.75 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 546.75 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 559.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Equitable Estoppel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 680.4 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 680.4 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 697.8530197143555 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 697.8530197143555 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 335.14495849609375, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 335.14495849609375, + 422.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 422.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759937" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3c7c6785d619a111b8ebd25695da49b956da858 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT Rou ISTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 3, 2017 AND/OR EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS RELATED TO COLLATERAL QUASI-CRIMINAL CASES + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bre4le,y J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby submits this R n Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Co earing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 and/or Extend Time to File Motions Related Wit , lateral Quasi-Criminal Cases, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +J. Ir1~20U9, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed suit against attorney alleging that Mr. had fabricated certain civil claims arising from Epstein's systematic sexual abuse of minor female children as part of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme that was running with Scott Rothstein and one of clients, LM. At the time Epstein filed suit, the validity of Epstein's criminal plea deal was being challenged by + +#### s Sun + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 2 of 7 + +his minor child victims in Doe v. United States case no. 08-cv-80736-KAM. For the next three (3) years, Epstein nonetheless pursued his claims against Mr.IIM never once suggesting a stay of this case was in order, and carrying the burden of proof with full knowledge of that pending Crime Victim Rights Act proceeding. In fact, Epstein even cited the Doty. United States case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 42 -4,61,1, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Cain "invalidating the I [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." + +In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims gain r. only days before a scheduled summary judgment hearing. Mr. Edw s immediately amended his counterclaim to assert a claim for malicious prosecution, allegif that E1 had no probable cause to initiate this suit in the first place. The allegations against Epstein byl= were in fact true, and the horrific nature of Epstein's cond dwards's clients obviated any need for Mr.M to fabricate his clients' claims. + +On September 25, less than three months before trial, Epstein filed the underlying Motion to Conti r id indicated that he would be moving to stay these proceedings until Doe v. ited is resolved. Thus, after assuming the burden of proof for three years, ow claims that he cannot defend this case and will "be forced to invoke his Fifth Amendment privileges" as a result of the prior-filed 2008 Crime Victim Rights Act proceeding. Epstein's desperate, last-ditch effort to avoid a trial on the merits should be rejected. Epstein filed the underlying action forming the basis of Mr. malicious prosecution claim after the Doe v. United States proceeding had been pending for over a year. Epstein's Amended + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 3 of 7 + +Complaint explicitly recognized that one of the potential outcomes of that proceeding was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecutionj Agreement." To now suggest, on the eve of trial, that this case should be stayed indefinitely pending resolution of that proceedin is belied by common sense and is an affront to Mr. =. right to a timely trial on me Epstein initiated this litigation. He asserted that the claims being pursued by Mr. 's clients were false and fabricated. After eight long years, the time has nally coFne for a jury to determine whether Epstein had any basis for these allega 44Q 'and Epstein is barred from using a prior-filed 2008 proceeding to avoid that determi t' n e should make the point that Epstein pled guilty when asked by the State trial co g imilar allegations; had his deposition taken numerous times in those cases and to c th \S 'r each time; then filed this action and also chose to invoke the 5th. + +# a. Waiver + +#### l all Memorandum of Law + +f + +.) + +"Waiver is the int onal or voluntary relinquishment of a known right or conduct which warrants an infe n of the relinquishment of a known right." Aberdeen Golf & Country Club v. Bliss Con 32 So. 2d 235, 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The elements of waiver are: (1) the existenc e time of the waiver of a right privilege, advantage or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v. Blu Ins. Agency, Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Epstein clearly waived any argument that the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding impeded his defense of Mr. malicious prosecution claim when he filed this underlying action in 2009, + +Mk adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 4 of 7 + +over a year after Doe was first initiated. Moreover, Epstein directly cited to and referenced the pending Doe v. United States proceeding in his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011: + +Amended Complaint at paragraph 29(4) (emphasis added). + +Epstein therefore not only knew that Doe v. Uni acknowledged to this Court way back in 2011 that one of 14(c2 et was the invalidation of his plea deal. Certainly, if p \te ' n ended to rely on this fact to stay or delay this proceeding, the time to raise it was ce latest) April 12, 2011, when Epstein filed that Amended Complaint. He failed to , andtlnstead chose to prosecute his underlying claims for another year and defend against ds' malicious prosecution claim for five more years. That active participation serve ye any argument that the Doe v. United States proceeding justifies an indefinite stay,-"is case. CI= v. Shield, 41 So. 3d 931, 033 (Fla. 4th DCA Fr 2010) (stating thzkNe context of arbitration, a party's "active participation in litigation" serves to waive arbitration). ates was pending, but he al outcomes of that proceeding + +. . . Instead, the purpose of requesting those records was to obtain them for use in a separately filed Criminal Victims Rights Act (CVRA) suit, Jane Doe 1 anda4Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra, which was brough ,I•Rt, seVeral purposes, including invalidating the pion-Prosecution] Agreemen O + +# b. Eq toppel + +Epstein's attempt to stay this case is also barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel, which has been a fundamental principle of American jurisprudence for centuries. Florida Dept. of Health & Rehab. Services v. S.A.P., 835 So. 2d 1091, 1096 (Fla. 2002). Equitable estoppel is "based on principals of fair play and essential justice [that] arises when one party lulls another + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 5 of 7 + +party into a disadvantageous legal position." Bueno v. Workman 20 So. 3d 993, 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The elements of equitable estoppel are: (1) a representation as to a material fact that is contrary to a later-asserted position, (2) reliance on that representation, and (3) a change in position detrimental to the party claiming estoppel, caused by the representatari - tid reliance thereon. Id. + +It is difficult to imagine a more clear-cut example of equitible pel than Epstein's eleventh-hour attempt to indefinitely stay litigation that he sjatted, based on a situation that he created. Epstein filed suit, representing to this Court and/Mr, Et3v6ards that he intended to prove that Mr.a had fabricated the sexual abuse alleg,ations against him. Epstein did so with full \\--t knowledge of the pending Doe v. United State% proceeding and while recognizing the possibility (\\ that his Non-Prosecution Agreement coulcThe invalidated. + +Mr. a was forced to cleft' against these allegations for three (3) years, in reliance 1 2'" VA on Epstein's representations. \*L . Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims, Mr. then spent the next five (5) yet pursing his malicious prosecution claim, which required Epstein to put forth at least spl evidence that the allegations asserted in the underlying complaint were true: had in fact pursued false sexual abuse claims against Epstein. Mr. pended substantial time and resources in this litigation in reliance on Epstein's representation that Epstein had probable cause to pursue his claims in the first place. + +Now, on the eve of trial, Epstein has changed tactics and asserted a new position: he cannot defend against the malicious prosecution claims because of the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding, which was filed before Epstein initiated this litigation. If that is true, how did Epstein intend to IIIMdv. Epstein Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 Page 6 of 7 + +prove his claims against Mr. )\_in the first place? Certainly, if Epstein could not defend against a malicious prosecution claim, then he should never have filed the underlying action to begin with. Simply put, Epstein's eleventh-hour attempt to avoid a trial due to circumstances that he created is unavailing and should be rejected based on the principles of equi etstoppel. + +Based upon the foregoing, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bra ey JOards respectfully (-"" submits that Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Continue and requ an eleventh-hour stay of this case should be denied. + +### Conclusion + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and co to all Counsel on the attached list, this .&e foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +> OLA C i Flo da tar No.: 169440 y E-Mail(s): isx@searcvlaw.com; and ccann@searcylaw.com rimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +2017. + +[REDACTED] § adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Motion to Continue Hearing Scheduled for October 3, 2017 + +Page 7 of 7 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED]; Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4448ab5a56708972aeede8b67f4b64b6de7678f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945/EFTA02759945.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759945.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 11804, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 3, 2017 AND/OR \nEXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS RELATED TO COLLATERAL QUASI-\nCRIMINAL CASES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 339.7988586425781 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 339.7988586425781 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 402.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 402.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "s Sun", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 557.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 557.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 571.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 571.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Waiver", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 123.97920227050781, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 123.97920227050781, + 477.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 477.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "l all\nMemorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.010009765625, + 427.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 383.7310791015625, + 427.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 383.7310791015625, + 449.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.010009765625, + 449.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Eq toppel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 586.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 586.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.2200012207031, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 254.593017578125 + ], + [ + 278.2200012207031, + 254.593017578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759945" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37d1a815c0e7018e655e5665e4ac217e7416b2f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.md @@ -0,0 +1,767 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CO P L D COVERY RESPONSES FROM + +Counter-Plaintiff J. ), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380 of the Floridntules Of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order Denying the Coun ant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and in s ereof states as follows: + +# INTRODUCTION + +Counter- dant's recently filed motion represents nothing more than a delayed effort to obfusca inent pending issues in this case in hopes of further delaying the rapidly approac al date. As noted in Counter-Defendant's motion, this Court entered Orders relevant to the underlying discovery more than five years ago - on April 10, 2012, May 7, 2012, and August 17, 2012. Conveniently excluded from Epstein's Motion is timely compliance with the direction of the Court. In fact, on August 3, 2012, this Court held a hearing regarding outstanding discovery. On August 7, 2012—after that hearing filed his + +Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order incorporating all responsive documents produced on May 8, 2012 in response to the Court's May 7, 2012 Order, and further asserting that "Mlle documents contained within Composite Exhibit A and those documents listed on the privilege log attached as Composite Exhibit together comprise the complete universe of responsive documents within possession, custody and control." See August 7, 2012 Motion attached hereto as Exhibit A. On August 9, 2012, communications between and agents of the federal August 7 correspondence, but had been previously pr publically accessible. informed Epstein by way of letter correspondence that the non-electronic '41-7 ent were not included in the pstein and were additionally + +On August 17, 2012, the Court entered an 'Cc \ responsive to the August 3, 2012 hearing wherein the Court required Counter-Plaintiff to produce non-privileged responsive documents and identify privileged responsive docuinerits in a proper privilege log. By the time the Court entered this Order had already m lied with the Court's direction based upon the discussion that occurred during the August,3 hearing. Despite Epstein's deliberate intention to mislead the Court regarding the statdcof discovery conducted over five years ago, the record is clear that fully comp etwitl ithe most recent relevant Order on this issue back in 2012. See Exhibit A and Exhibit a, + +# MEMORANDUM OF LAW + +Under Florida law "trial courts are imbued with broad discretion in discovery matters." National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Embrey, 375 So.2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Although Courts are to give liberal construction to the rules of discove and Courts have broad discretion in discovery matters, such discretion is limited and must erc within the permissible scope of discovery as set forth in the rules. See Nat'l Co ,.'c ?'Stores, Inc. v. Embrey, 375 So. 2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). "Parties may ob in discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matt e pending action" or if the information sought appears reasonably calculated the discovery of admissible evidence. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(6)(1). Pursuant le .280(5), "[w]hen a party withholds information otherwise discoverable under th protection as trial preparation material e shall make the claim expressly and shall describe the nature of the documents, Gomm iicaC oons, or things not produced or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing informat ritself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the applicability of the pthoiregt or protection." Furthermore, Rule 1.280 does not provide a time limit for the filing' privilege log. Allstate Indem. Co. v. Oser, 893 So.2d 675, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 200 y claiming that it is privileged or subject to + +Iii\this case, either already made production or objected on a timely basis to requests, and provided a detailed privilege log in accordance with the Court's August 17, 2012 Order. There can be no doubt that did not waive any privilege, but rather filed timely objections and asserted his claims of privilege in accordance with Rule 1.280. Furthermore, as noted above, all documents within possession, custody, or control were either produced + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +2009CA040800XXXXMB +Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery +Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +or identified by way of his properly asserted privilege log. Consequently, contrary to Epstein's Motion, [REDACTED] has already fully responded to Epstein's requests. + +### CONCLUSION + +Wherefore, Counter-Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny Jeffrey Epstein's five-year delayed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] as the requested relief is moot as [REDACTED] has already fulfilled his discovery obligations. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 28th day of Sept., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +2009CA040800XXXXMB +Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery +Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +adv. Epstein 2009CA040800XXXXMB Memorandum inigtion.lein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from J. + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys 4414sc for Jeffrey Epstein Attorneys for Scott Rothstein IS9 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +A + +#### SECOND SUPPLEMENTAIALESPOASE TO EPSTEIN'S REOUEST TO PRODUCE t STII#NT 14/ TO COURT ORDER + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLE ( . tr, RDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this Second Suppleme Res S nse to EPSTEIN'S Request to Produce in compliance with this Court's Orde S as follows: + +- I. Copies of materials revt roduced to counsel for EPSTEIN on May 8, 2012 are attached as C torite Exhibit A. Some of the produced documents contain privilege redacti s as no u tion was culled by electronic search of approximately 28,000 documents ased to by the RRA Bankruptcy Trustee. documents contained within Composite Exhibit A and those documents listed on the privilege log attached as Composite Exhibit B, together comprise the complete universe of responsive documents within possession, custody and control. + +A Cos + +![](_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg) + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order + +Page 2 of 3 + +- 4. IIIME reaffirms the accuracy of IIMM Supplemental Response to Request to Produce previously filed on June 8, 2012 and attached as Exhibit C. +- 5. employment with RRA commenced in approximately A of 2009, and he has retained no electronic communications from prior to that + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregpM 0 en furnished by Electronic and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this r of August, 2012. + +JACK SC + +Florida 40 + +Searc la Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + ++6s + +Lakes Boulevard + +ch, Florida 33409 + +) 686-6300 + +561) 383-9451 + +eys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff, + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order + +Page 3 o(3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Esquire Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & + +Lehrman, FL + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954) 524-2820 + +Fax: (954) 524-2822 CO N + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +Phone: (561) 659-8300 "S C) + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954) 745-5849 + +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esqui + +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 333 + +Phone: (954) 467-1 3 + +Fax: (954) 337-3 + +Lilly Ann S Esquire + +The L-S + +Atto effrey Epstein + +1441 Bric I Avenue, 15th Floor + +Miami, FL 33131 + +Phone: (305) 503-5503 + +Fax: (305) 503-6801 + +NOTA CORRIDORED COPY + +Docs + +Responsive + +~~to~~ ORDER + +EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN + +5-07-2012 + +EXHIBIT A +1 of 164 + +## BRAD - PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|----------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ...Emails01 | 05/22/2010
9:53am | ██████████ | ██████████ | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails01 | 05/22/2010
9:10am | Conchita
██████████ | ██████████ | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails01-02 | 05/22/2010
8:47am | ██████████ | Conchita
██████████ | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails02 | 05/21/2010
12:44pm | ██████████ | Conchita
Sarnoff | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails03 | 6/2/2010
11:50 am | ██████████;
Spencer
Kuvin; Mike
Fisten | Conchita
██████████ | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails03 | 6/2/2010
10:49 am | Conchita
██████████;
Spencer
Kuvin; Mike
Fisten | ██████████ | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product | + +## BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| # | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|----------------|----------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privilege | +| ...Emails03-04 | 6/2/2010
10:42 am | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED]
Spencer Kuvin;
Mike Fisten | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails05 | 6/7/2010
8:01pm | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Investigation of other potential witnesses. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
11:30am | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
10:13am | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Brad Edwards | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
9:52am | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
9:27am | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Brad
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product | + +#### BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privilege | +| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
9:27am | Brad
██████████ | ██████████ | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:55am | ██████████ | Brad
██████████ | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:40am | Brad
██████████ | ██████████ | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:26am | ██████████ | Brad Edwards | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails08 | 6/8/2010
8:10am | Brad
██████████ | ██████████ | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails08 | 6/7/2010
21:57 am | ██████████ | Brad
██████████ | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product | + +# BRAD — PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION I | OBJECTION | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------|--------------| +| .Emails08 6/7/2010 Brad Location of | Irrelevant | not | reasonably | +| 8:24am Witnesses | calculated | to | lead to the | +| | discovery | of | admissible | +| | evidence | and | outside the | +| time | frame | of | Plaintiffs | +| | complai | | Work product | +| privil | e | | | +| .Emails08 6/7/2010 Conchita Brad Location of In: | ant | of | reasonably | +| 20:06 Witnesses | ted | to | lead to the | +| dEL | y | of | admissible | +| | ence | and | outside the | +| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's | +| | complaint | Work | product | +| .Emails08 -9 6/7/2010 Brad Conchita Lo 'o of | Irrelevant | not | reasonably | +| 7:57Pm | calculated | to | lead to the | +| | discovery | of | admissible | +| | evidence | and | outside the | +| time | frame | or | Plaintiffs | +| | complaint | Work | product | +| .Emails010 6/15/2010 Brad Maritza Vazquez — | Irrelevant | not | reasonably | +| 64 ;:i ‘ ) C | | | | +| Witness | calculated | to | lead to the | +| | discovery | of | admissible | +| | evidence | and | outside the | +| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's | +| | complaint | Work | product | +| .Emails011 6/16/2010 Bra Conchita Information re: | Irrelevant | not | reasonably | +| 1 :10po | | | | +| Kuvin; Peter | | | | +| child sex | | | | +| | calculated | to lead | to the | +| | discovery | of | admissible | +| | evidence and | | outside the | +| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's | +| | complaint | Work | product | +| .Emaiis012 6/17/2010 Brad Conchita Information re: Irrelevant | | not | reasonably | +| 11 :37am child sex | | | | +| trafficking and | | | | +| calculated | | to lead | to the | +| discovery | | of | admissible | +| investigation and | | | | +| preparation for | | | | +| evidence | and | | outside the | +| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's | +| complaint | | Work | product | + +# BRAD MN PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|----------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privilege | +| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
11:19am | [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege | +| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
11:16am | Brad [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege | +| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
10:53am | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege | +| ...Emails012-
013 | 6/17/2010
10:33am | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita
Sarnoff | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege | +| ...Emails014 | 6/30/2010
11:22am | Brad [REDACTED];
Mike Fisten | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of
witnesses in
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege | +| ...Emails015 | 7/5/2010
2:27pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of
witnesses in
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product | + +## BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------|--------------------|---------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privilege | +| ...Emails015 | 7/5/2010
14:08 | [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails015-016 | 7/5/2010
2:03pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails016 | 7/5/2010
13:35 | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails016 | 7/5/2010
1:30pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita Sarnoff | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
3:16pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | +| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
13:44 | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product | + +**BRAD [REDACTED] - PRIVILEGE LOG** +**EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010** + +| [REDACTED] | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
1:36pm | Brad
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | privilege
Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +WEST PALM REACH OFFICE + +2109 PALM REACH LAKES BLVD +WEST PALM REACH FLORIDA 33409 + +PO BOX 762 +WEST PALM REACH FLORIDA 33402 + +(561) 886-6300 +1-800-760-8607 +1-800-220-7006 Spanish + +SEARCY +DENNEY +SCAROLA +BARNHART +& SHIPLEY, P.A. + +ITALIAHASSEE OFFICE + +THE TOWLE HOUSE +SIX NORTH CALHOUN STREET +TALLAHASSEE, FL 32001-0011 + +(850) 224-1600 +1-868-549-7011 + +VIA EMAIL and U.S. MAIL +tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com + +June 08, 2012 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Re: [REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Our File No.: 291874 + +Dear Ms. Coleman: + +Attached is our Supplemental Response to Request to Produce as that request was modified by Court Order of April 10, 2012. Upon receipt and review of this attachment, please inform us whether you intend to proceed with Monday's hearing. + +ATTORNEYS AT LAW +ROSALYN SMITH KAREN-BARNES +\* GREGORY BARNHART +T HARDEE [REDACTED] H +LAURIE J BRIGGS +BRIAN R DENNEY +BRENDA S. FULNER +MARIAND [REDACTED] +JAMES W. GUSTAFSON, JR. +JACK P [REDACTED] +DAVID K. KELLEY, JR. +CAMERON M. KENNEDY +[REDACTED] +DARRYL L [REDACTED] +\*WILLIAM A. NORTON +[REDACTED] E CURLAN +EDWARD V. RICCI +\*JOHN SCAROLA +\*CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY +\*JOHN A. SHIPLEY H +[REDACTED] K. SPEED H +BRIAN P. [REDACTED] H +KAREN E. TERRY +DONALD J. [REDACTED] H +\*C. CALVIN WARRINER H + +OE COUNSEL +\*EARL L. DENNEY, JR.5 + +SHAREHOLDERS +\*BOARD CERTIFIED + +ALSO ADVISED +\*KENTUCKY +\* MARIE +\* MARYLAND +\* MASSACHUSETTS +\* MISSISSIPPI +\* NEW HAMPSHIRE +\* NEW JERSEY +\* VIRGINIA +\* WASHINGTON DC + +FARALEGALS +OWAN AVANTEURER +HARRY M. DUFRESNE +DAVID W. GRAMME +JOHN C. HOPKINS +DEBORAH M. KHARP +WINGENT L. SEOMART, MF +JAMES PETER LIVE +ROBERT W. PATCHER +MARK P. PONCY +KATHREDA SANCH +STEVE M. SAVIN +BORNE S. STARR +WALTER A. STEIN + +Sincerely, +JACK SCAROLA +JS/men +Esq. +Rec: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esq. + +![](_page_17_Picture_41.jpeg) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Plaintiff(s). + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +██████ SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this supplemental response to the following request of Epstein: + +All emails, data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008 through August 1, 2010 by and between ██████ J. ██████, Scott W. Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Cara Holmes, Mike Fisten, and any one of the following regarding or mentioning Jeffrey Epstein in any way; (a) the U.S. Attorney's Office, (b) the State Attorney's Office, (c) the Federal Bureau of Investigation, (d) Conchita Sarnoff, and (e) any other news employees or reporters. + +Supplemental Response: + +Except as previously delivered to Epstein's counsel or specifically identified on the previously delivered privilege log, no additional documents responsive to Epstein's request are in ██████ ██████ possession, custody or control. + +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Edwards' Supplemental Response to Request to Produce + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Electronic and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of June, 2012 + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 382-9451 + +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040806XXXXMBAG +██████████ Supplemental Response to Request to Produce + +COUNSEL LIST + +██████████ J. ██████████ Esquire +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████████ Fistos & +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 467-1223 +Fax: (954) 337-3716 + +Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esquire +The L.S. Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305) 503-5503 +Fax: (305) 503-6801 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +ADDENDUM TO SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY ORDER + +██████ J. ██████, through counsel, files this Addendum to the previously filed Supplemental Response to this Court's Order in response to ██████' Motion for Clarification. + +See attached letter + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Electronic and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of August, 2012. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +![](_page_21_Picture_137.jpeg) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Addendum to Supplemental Response to Discovery Order +Page 2 of 2 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 467-1223 +Fax: (954) 337-3716 + +Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esquire +The L-S Law Firm +Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305) 503-5503 +Fax: (305) 503-6801 + +SEARCY +DENNEY +SCAROLA +BARNHART +& SHIPLEY, PA + +*Allernees +at Law* + + WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE: + +2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD +WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 + +P.O. BOX 3626 +WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 + +(561) 686-6300 +1-800-780-8607 +1-800-220-7006 Spanish + + TALLAHASSEE OFFICE: + +THE TOWLE HOUSE +517 NORTH CALHOUN STREET +TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-1231 + +(850) 224-7600 +1-888-549-7011 + +VIA EMAIL and U.S. MAIL +tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com + +August 09, 2012 + +ATTORNEYS AT LAW: + +ROSALYN SIA BAKER-BARNES +\*F. GREGORY BARNHART +T. HARDEE BASS, III +LAURIE J. BRIGGS +BRIAN R. DENNEY +BRENDA S. FULMER +MARIANO [REDACTED] +JAMES W. GUSTAFSON, JR. +JACK P. [REDACTED] +DAVID K. KELLEY, JR. +CAMERON M. KENNEDY +WILLIAM B. [REDACTED] +DARRYL L. [REDACTED] +\*WILLIAM A. NORTON +[REDACTED] E. QUINLAN2 +EDWARD V. RICCI +\*JOHN SCAROLA +\*CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY +\*JOHN A. SHIPLEY III +[REDACTED] K. SPEED III +BRIAN P. [REDACTED] I4 +KAREN E. TERRY +DONALD J. [REDACTED] III +\*C. CALVIN WARRINER III + +DE COUNSEL +\*EARL L. DENNEY, JR.5 + +SHAREHOLDERS +\*BOARD CERTIFIED + +ALSO ADMITTED +1KENTUCKY +2MAINE +3MARYLAND +4MASSACHUSETTS +5MESSISSIPPI +6NEW HAMPSHIRE +7NEW JERSEY +8VIRGINIA +9WASHINGTON DC + +PARALEGALS +VIVIAN AYAN-TEJEDA +RANDY M. DUFRESNE +DAVID W. GILMORE +JOHN C. [REDACTED] +DESORAH M. KNAPP +VINCENT L. LEONARD, JR. +JAMES PETER LOVE +ROBERT W. PITCHER +MARK P. POINCY +KATHLEEN [REDACTED] +STEVE M. [REDACTED] +BONNIE S. STARK +WALTER A. [REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Re: [REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Our File No.: 291874 + +Dear Ms. Haddad-Coleman: + +It has just been brought to my attention that our prior Paragraph 13 production and privilege log were limited to electronically stored email communications. Neither the production nor the privilege log included the non-electronic communications between [REDACTED] and agents of the federal government. However, those letters and pleadings have all previously been provided to Mr. Epstein and his counsel through public filings in the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedings in federal court. In that they remain equally accessible to you now, it is not our intention to separately produce these documents. + +Sincerely, + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +JS/mep + +cc: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire + +![](_page_23_Picture_51.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9cc3614282cda4dce46104b69b920565eb2257a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/EFTA02759952.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1516 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 24, + "chars": 40348, + "elapsed_seconds": 19.6, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_41.jpeg", + "_page_21_Picture_137.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_51.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 113.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 113.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CO P L D COVERY RESPONSES \nFROM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 507.47454833984375, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 507.47454833984375, + 375.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 375.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.681 + ], + [ + 356.9918212890625, + 498.681 + ], + [ + 356.9918212890625, + 513.9335327148438 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 513.9335327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.1696472167969, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.1696472167969, + 121.10302734375 + ], + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 121.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 202.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 119.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.448, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 526.5693969726562, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 526.5693969726562, + 125.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 308.448, + 125.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND SUPPLEMENTAIALESPOASE TO \nEPSTEIN'S REOUEST TO PRODUCE t STII#NT 14/ TO COURT ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 492.0104064941406, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 492.0104064941406, + 365.1870422363281 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 365.1870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 140.55889892578125 + ], + [ + 353.3052062988281, + 140.55889892578125 + ], + [ + 353.3052062988281, + 154.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 154.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD - PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.47000122070312, + 48.14166259765625 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 48.14166259765625 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 203.47000122070312, + 76.14 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.2200164794922, + 48.7802734375 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 48.7802734375 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 201.2200164794922, + 76.94999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.33999633789062, + 49.27166748046875 + ], + [ + 452.26800000000003, + 49.27166748046875 + ], + [ + 452.26800000000003, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 202.33999633789062, + 76.94999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD \u2014 PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 457.8712463378906, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 457.8712463378906, + 79.68743896484375 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 79.68743896484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD MN PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 456.2516784667969, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 456.2516784667969, + 78.5306396484375 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 78.5306396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG \nEMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.83999633789062, + 51.41021728515625 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 51.41021728515625 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 200.83999633789062, + 79.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRAD [REDACTED] - PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 51.84 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 51.84 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 81.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WEST PALM REACH OFFICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.9, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 45.9, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 167.67000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ITALIAHASSEE OFFICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 500.616, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 574.0559999999999, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 574.0559999999999, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 500.616, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.328, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 515.9159999999999, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 515.9159999999999, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 302.328, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 348.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supplemental Response:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 551.61 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 170.1 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.224, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.224, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDENDUM TO SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 496.9440000000001, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 496.9440000000001, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 152.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, PA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 359.856, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 359.856, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 31.823999999999998, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 31.823999999999998, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TALLAHASSEE OFFICE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 509.18399999999997, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 589.356, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 589.356, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 509.18399999999997, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA EMAIL and U.S. MAIL tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 230.03999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 168 + ], + [ + "Line", + 81 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 298 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 337 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 192 + ], + [ + "Line", + 85 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 190 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759952" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_17_Picture_41.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_17_Picture_41.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb46c9cfafd4d3871ceeb68bf32edf4244e3f949 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_17_Picture_41.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9816dbbb4046c02774432f539e357b74384258ed6faeabfcc170927e8af1860a +size 7910 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_21_Picture_137.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_21_Picture_137.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc050d1eba7bb9ef84391bd04ce02ae807eff3ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_21_Picture_137.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0daffd5d26c61b64b66cb4f56e0aa05f3c86ec3bf20886a3c210992bdb0a4f62 +size 7741 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_23_Picture_51.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_23_Picture_51.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e8f382905f87c0b84fc6501a70653876e3d9a16 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_23_Picture_51.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b4f252c4181b0cc4513f9aaaecef793f095fb06f99b09df8d1d964d65a55c2f9 +size 7046 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b446904dc934f379da89b76a7391da82fae1d3ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759952/_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e873a07cf3fc6e186528f4c47388430aace79dae124cd18135888e16ba5a1dff +size 9605 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf5dd614e80ed22402e951ff7e3348ccdcfb05da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +#### CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FRO ARTY FILED ON SEPTEMBE + +TO: JACK SCAROLA Esq. Attorneys for J. Search, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 E-Mail: \_scarolateam@s jsx@searcylaw mmccann .com le}; P.A. + +YOU HEZ31 NOTIFIED that PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EP Al , lit5 jects to the Notice of Production from Non-Party filed on September 19, 2017, and poenas directed to = L. Ackerman, Esquire., Robert D. Critton, Esquire, Jack A. eeGoldberger, Esquire, and Roy Black, Esquire. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished to all Parties on the attached Service List by Electronic Service and by E-Mail, this 2nd day of October, 2017. + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. + +Counsel for Plaintiff + +250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasst@ + +# Electronic Service List: + +### Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mcp®searcylaw.com + +### Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com + +J. .Es . , Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +# Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc@nuriklaw.com + +### Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Wei 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 3 E-Mails: jgoldberg a.com smaho a com + +### Fred Hadda + +Haddad , PLLC 1 Fin , Suite 2612 Fort Lau le, FL 33394 E-Mails: dee®haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +# Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling®tonjahaddad.com Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0215fdc37821556250b9758c56268599d621c81 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976/EFTA02759976.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759976.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2312, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 510.4084167480469, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 510.4084167480469, + 99.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 99.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 113.299 + ], + [ + 493.62921142578125, + 113.299 + ], + [ + 493.62921142578125, + 141.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 141.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTION TO \nNOTICE OF PRODUCTION FRO ARTY \nFILED ON SEPTEMBE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.524, + 305.99 + ], + [ + 442.5401916503906, + 305.99 + ], + [ + 442.5401916503906, + 348.10302734375 + ], + [ + 169.524, + 348.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.5245666503906, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.5245666503906, + 71.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 71.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 194.2798614501953, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 194.2798614501953, + 71.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 71.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 169.4344940185547, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 169.4344940185547, + 99.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 99.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 184.87252807617188, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 184.87252807617188, + 182.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 182.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 178.572998046875, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 178.572998046875, + 375.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 375.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 205.20298767089844, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 205.20298767089844, + 458.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 458.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 554.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 554.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 228.45298767089844, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 228.45298767089844, + 637.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 637.8630218505859 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759976" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04d1a9a41d429a0482c7bca04944ccb86458e424 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITIONS + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned atto the Depositions of: + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Roy Black Esq. L. Ackerman, Esq. 10/6/17 a 10/6/1 10/, 3 1:3 p.m. 0 p.m. 1:00 p.m. at Searcy Denney at Searcy Denney at Searcy Denney at Searcy Denney + +I HEREBY CERTIFY t ta t and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached day of akb12-e-e- , 2017. + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting, Inc. + +ROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcvlaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. ru.se No • R5 79 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a2e6595c39798a3adba5876152e080b9d7ea0b0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979/EFTA02759979.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759979.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2190, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 310.125 + ], + [ + 446.90338134765625, + 310.125 + ], + [ + 446.90338134765625, + 325.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 325.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759979" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..750c75443385a82e67b4ee3eae941305c23b5395 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.md @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMounter-Defendant, + +v. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +J. et al., + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +JUDGE HAFELE + +### PIAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEI O,TION FOR TEMPORARY STAY OF PROCEEDING + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstei i' and through undersigned counsel hereby respectfully moves this Honorable Court ly stay the above-captioned proceedings pending the outcome of a related quas tter, Doe v. United States, No. 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.) (the "Doe "), rought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a") on behal o o ivil claimants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Fl should not be permitted to pursue this monetary damage lawsuit aga in which he is seeking large punitive damages amounts on behalf of himself, hi contemporaneously pursuing a federal lawsuit in which articulated an ate aim is the invalidation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, thereby requiring. Epst n to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and forego a estimony that would be pivotal in his defense against this ongoing civil litigatio + +In e Doe Case, claimants are seeking to rescind Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("NPA"). If successful, the claimants and Mr. will seek to expose Mr. Epstein to comprehensive criminal liability in the Southern District of Florida for alleged acts occurring from 2001 through + +i Mr. Epstein, having withdraw ' • against is, at this stage of the proceedings, a de facto defendant answering Mr. counterc aims. + +2007. Mr. efforts at prosecuting both his own and his clients' claims against Mr. Epstein have already required Mr. Epstein to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination in different matters also involving attorney IM; most recently in, Gujffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.), see infra, where Mr. Epstein was a witness, not a party. If a stay is not granted, Mr. Epstein will likewise need to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege in the instant proceeding. Mr. Edward's efforts at rescinding the PA have effectively put Mr. Epstein between the proverbial rock and a hard place. Mr. ertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege will impair his ability to present a the alleged claims against him in this pending civil case — claims that as and as illustrated in both his witness and exhibit lists contends substantially overlap the subject matter of the Epstein to either assert his constitutional privilege or the heartland of the protections conferred by th have no bearing on this litigation, but that EASar! t For Mr. Epstein to claim the privilege stea waive it in order to present his defenses, could potentially expose him to crimi p tion; particularly if Mr. succeeds in his efforts to invalidate the NPA. should not be allowed to use the Doe Case, and Mr. Epstein's resulting and nabs apprehension of the potential for comprehensive criminal exposure in the S he rn 'strict of Florida to his advantage as he pursues monetary and punitive dama s personal benefit against Mr. Epstein; especially at a time when Mr. Epstein defend himself due to Mr. prosecution of the Doe Case. As a result, Lein respectfully requests this Honorable Court to temporarily stay the abovecaptioned matter pending the resolution of the Doe Case. Odvanced by Mr. case, are claims he ctably will require Mr. tify to matters squarely within NPA; issues that Epstein submits ly intends to make the crwc of his case. + +## I. BACKGROUND + +For nearly a decade, Mr. , both as an attorney for alleged victims and as a claimant himself, has been making claims against Mr. Epstein, with the express intent and desire for Mr. Epstein to be criminally prosecuted. See Doe v. United States, No. 08-cv-80736-KAM + +(S.D. Fla.); Victim's Reply to Government's Response to Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (Doc. 9) at 2, 10-11; Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Response to Government's Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 127) at 1- 2, 5, 7, 14, 15-16. Both Mr. and Mr. Paul Cassell, his co-counsel in the Doe Case, during sworn deposition testimony and in their pleadings, have unequivocally stated that causing a criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is a primary objective of their pending litigat' n in Doe v United States. Mr. is himself suing Mr. Epstein for malicious prosecute instant case, and is seeking to hold Mr. Epstein financially liable to Mr. g other ways, portraying Mr. Epstein as someone culpable of numerous federal ' enses involving Mr. intends to call as witnesses in his case-in-chief. See Fifth Amended and Su 1 Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J filed on July 21, 2017. ards has also represented three litigants in civil cases against Mr. Epstein involv based on such allegations of sexual misconduct and in related matters? while al acts working to invalidate Mr. Epstein's NPA and have Mr. Epstein prosecuted for the i sam conduct. sexual misconduct with minor females, several of whom + +ie in and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida tered Jlto a NPA covering five separate categories of alleged offenses relating to alle misconduct with minor females between 2001 and September 2007 for which t l government was investigating Mr. Epstein: (1) violations of conspiracy to U.S.C. §2422(b), (2) violations of conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §2423(b), ons of 18 U.S.C. §§2422(b), (4) violations of 2423(b), and (5) violations of 1591(a A at 1-2. The NPA also encompassed offenses such as money laundering that were investigated by the United States Attorney's Office. As such, the efforts to invalidate the NPA also impact and impair Mr. Epstein's ability to respond to questions about finances, net worth, financial, and monetary transactions. In accordance with the terms of the NPA, Mr. + +See e.g., Guiffiv v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.); Jane Doe II v. Epstein, No. 09-cv-80469-KAM (S.D. Fla.); L.M. v. Epstein, No. 09-cv-81092-ICAM (S.D. Fla.); Jane Doe et. al. v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80119-ICAM (S.D. Fla.). + +Epstein pled guilty to two discrete state offenses under § 796.07 and 796.03 of the Florida Statutes. See Id. at 3. On July 7, 2008 — one week after Mr. Epstein entered his state pleas of guilty — attorney on behalf of Jane Doe, brought a petition before the District Court for the Southern District of Florida seeking to enforce Jane Doe's rights pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 ("CVRA"). See Doe Case, Dkt. 1. The petitioners in the Doe Case argued that the Government violated their rights to notice and consultati under the CVRA, and as a result they are now seeking to vacate the NPA. See Doe Case, 1; Doe v. United States, 950 F. Supp. 2d 1262, 1264 (S.D. Fla. 2013). Consi petitioners' claims, the court held that rescission of the NPA is a potential rem RA is properly interpreted to authorize the rescission or 're-opening' of a prosecuto ement - including a non-prosecution arrangement - reached in violation of a pr conferral obligations under the statute." Id. at 7. While the NPA has been in eff y ten years, there is a risk that Mr. may ultimately succeed in his effo d the NPA and seek to expose Mr. Epstein to potential criminal liability in the uth j.District of Florida. See FIGHT TO REOPEN TEEN SEX CASE AGAINST JEFF IN AY SET PRECEDENT, MYPALMBEACIIPOST, http://www.mypalmbeachpost.co n me--law/fight-reopen-teen-sex-case-against-jeffepstein-may-set-precedent/hxt c59vrbz8teK/ (last visited Aug 27, 2017), attached hereto as Exhibit 1. + +# IL MR. EPS HA A VALID FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE + +It is w hed that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "can be assert an proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudica astigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 444 (1972). To support an invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, future prosecution need not be probable: it need only be possible. See, e.g., Convenino v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 795 F.3d 587, 594 (6th Cir. 2015); In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig., 661 F.2d 1145, 1150 (7th Cir. 1981), affd sub nom. Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248 (1983). The protection of the Fifth Amendment extends "not only [to] statements that are themselves evidence of criminal violations, but also [to] 'those [statements] which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime." Rajah v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 427, 441 (2d Cir. 2008), quoting United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 38 (2000). See, e.g., United States v. Greenfield, 2016 WL 4073250 at \*5 (2d Cir. Aug. 1, 2016) ("the Fifth Amendment privilege has been found to extend not only to answers that are directly incriminatory but also to those that, while not themselves inculpatory, would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute th claimant.") (internal quotation marks omitted). In assessing the validity of an assertion of ndment privilege, the Court must look to all of the circumstances of the case and " e ed as much by personal perceptions of the peculiarities of the case as by the fac evidence." SEC v. Militano, 1991 WL 270116, at \*3 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 9, 1991) (quotin man v. United States, 341 U. S. 479, 486 (1951). A witness may be compelled to, Camelot Group, Ltd. v. W. A. Krueger Co., 486 F 341 U.S. 486-87 ("To sustain the privilege,•Sn is y be evident from the implications of the question, in the setting in which it is , t t a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be e t be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result"); see also Raass v. Bo So. 2d 121, 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994) (following Hoffinan to preclude di very concerning defendant dentist's chemical dependency); Appel v. Bard, 154 So. 3d 1 7, 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015); O'Neal v. Sun Bank, N.A., 754 So. 2d 170, 171 (Fla. App. 2000) ("The privilege may be invoked in a civil action during a discovery g if the civil litigant has reasonable grounds to believe that direct answers to depost r or terrogatory would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him.") (citing Hoffinan). nly "if it clearly appears he is mistaken as to the justification for the privilege or 's ng his claim as a subterfuge." pp 4\ 2 1, 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1980); Hoffman, + +Mr. Epstein's potential assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege in the instant case is more than amply justified by a well-founded fear of prosecution — prosecution that Mr. has been seeking in the Doe Case for almost a decade. Any statements made by Mr. Epstein as to matters relating to allegations of abuse or relating to Mr. Epstein's monetary and financial + +transactions and/or his financial assets and resources could provide the impetus for possible future prosecution based on such alleged conduct or, at minimum, a link in the chain that could be exploited to develop additional evidence against him for crimes including those that are within the scope of the NPA. In a previous matter, &rite v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.), where the unsealed record reflects Mr. Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege, motions to compel were brought, and Mr. Epstein was not required to tes based on his assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege, see Dkt. 449 and 483. As Mr. Epstein suffered no prejudice from Ms principled and upheld assertio f the Fifth Amendment in that matter; by contrast, however, in this mattecat le prejudice front the potential finding of adverse inferences against a Party asserting e I•lfth intendment in a civil proceeding and from being foreclosed from pursuing,' five defenses that rely upon his testimony will be immense. + +While it is Mr. Epstein's position that he dM Cs y 14/ 9, the subject matter of the NPA (which is v e other districts),' the risk of any inva ' 'on o the NPA creates more comprehensive Fifth Amendment concerns, carries the s • ' leant risk of criminal prosecution, and requires the broadest invocation of the Fi A dment as to predictable subjects in the pending civil litigation. Thus, while efforts to impair Mr. Epstein's NPA are ongoing and vigorous (the Doe v nit Cates litigation has been ongoing for over nine years, with well over a hundred pa o nt filings in support of Mr. Edward's request for partial Summary Judgment has a Fifth Amendment privilege that he must assert to abate a signifi that if Mr. alt privilege to topics extending beyond is and does not preclude prosecution in is successful and the NPA is invalidated and criminal charges are thereafter returned in the Southern District of Florida, that Mr. Epstein will not have + +&#x27; The Government has argued in Doe v United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM, Dkt. 205-2 at 9-13, that, by its express terms, the NPA binds only the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, is venue and subject matter specific, and does not, accordingly, preclude prosecution in any other district nor prosecution for offenses that were not within the statutes specifically enumerated in the NPA or the subject of the joint investigation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. NPA at 2-3. + +waived his principled Fifth Amendment rights regarding the subject matter of such a potential prosecution and will not have testified without immunity in a manner that may be used to further any potential future criminal prosecution. Such risks that are directly derivative of Mr. Edward's litigation in the Doe case can only be reduced if Mr. withdraws the remedy of invalidating the NPA, which is but one of many remedies he is seeking in his Doe Case petition, or upon the court ruling and denying his request to invalidate the NPA, or upon thi( Honorable Court granting the request for a stay until after the Doe case concludes. + +#### IILTHIS HONORABLE COURT SHOULD TEMPORARILY STAY DINGS PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE DOE CASE + +Trial courts have long had the discretion to manage their d when circumstances require it. See United States v. Kordel, 3 that courts "have deferred civil proceedings pendin prosecutions when the interests of justice seemed Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936) ("the pow inherent in every court to control the dispo time and effort for itself, for counse 608 (3d Cir. 1967) (affirming s proceeding). While there is resolution of a related en and stay proceedings 1, 12 n. 27 (1970) (noting letion of parallel criminal ch action"); Landis v. North Am. proceedings is incidental to the power e causes on its docket with the economy of itigants"); Texaco, Inc. v. Borda, 383 F.2d 607, case pending determination of parallel criminal Case titutional right to a stay of civil proceedings pending oceeding, circumstances such as the ones sub judice frequently warrant a stay. Se .g., A o-Lecon, Inc. v. United States, 820 F. 2d 1198, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 1987) ("it has Ion e practice to 'freeze' civil proceedings when a criminal prosecution involvi e facts is warming up or under way'); Texaco, 383 F. 2d at 608 (affirming stay); Br Tolkow, 109 F.R.D. 116 (E.D.N.Y. 1985) (Fact that indictment had not yet been returned did not preclude stay of discovery in civil action pending outcome of criminal action which might be brought against defendants as result of Justice Department investigation); Kashi v. Gratsos, 790 F.2d 1050, 1057 (2d Cir. 1986) (No abuse of discretion where "District court granted [] motion [to stay] and delayed the trial until the U.S. Attorney's office announced that it had declined prosecution."). + +Courts commonly stay civil cases "where a party under criminal indictment is also required to defend a civil suit involving the same matter...[because] denying a stay may undermine a party's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination... or may otherwise prejudice the criminal case." Am. Express Bus. Fin. Corp. v. RWProfl Leasing Servs. Corp., 225 F. Supp. 2d 263, 265 (E.D.N.Y. 2002). Given the risks inherent if the NPA is invalidated in the Doe litigation, Mr. Epstein's position is comparable. + +In considering whether a stay is warranted this Court should consider ing six factors: "I) the extent to which the issues in the criminal case overlap with those presented in the civil case; 2) the status of the case, including whether the defendan private interests of the plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously weigh plaintiffs caused by the delay; 4) the private interests of ve been indicted; 3) the inst the prejudice to on the defendants; 5) the interests of the courts; and 6) the public interest." Lo Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F. 3d 83, 99 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing to Truste I ers & Pipetters Nat'l Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc., 886 F.Supp? S 3 s, 8 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (ordering stay of civil proceedings)); Square I Bank v. Lo, No CV- 595-JSC, 2014 WL 7206874, at \*5 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2014) (granting stay pen ant's sentencing); Folmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., 152 F.R.D. 36 .N.Y. 1993) (granting stay); Walsh Sec., Inc. v. Cristo Prop. Mgmt., Ltd., 7 F. 'p. 2 23 (D.N.J. 1998) (stay warranted by similarity of issues in civil and criminal ngs, serious Fifth Amendment concerns about self-incrimination if civil trial co sence of prejudice to mortgagee from delay, burden on defendants without s blic interest in favor of stay); Colombo v. Bd. of Educ. for the Clifton Sc!:. Dist., 5416058, at \*1 (D.N.J. Nov. 4, 2011) (stay "pending the resolution of the criminal charges" granted); S.E.C. v. Nicholas, 569 F. Sun. 2d 1065 (C.D. Cal. 2008) (complete stay of civil enforcement action by Securities and Exchange Commission in favor of parallel criminal actions was warranted as being in best interest of justice; criminal case was of primary importance to public, defendants and the court, discovery in civil action would almost certainly cause delay in criminal action, specter of parties and witnesses likely to invoke their Fifth + +Amendment rights would render civil discovery largely one-sided, and civil and criminal cases were inextricably intertwined and could not reasonably proceed independent of each other). + +Florida courts have similarly followed national precedent allowing the defendants to stay civil proceedings when their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is implicated: Klein v. Royale Grp., Ltd., 524 So. 2d 1061, 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988) (affirming eight month stay of civil proceedings based on defendants' assertion of their Fifth Amen ent rights); McCreery v. Fernandez, 882 So. 2d 498, 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004) (deni o tion for continuance of the trial in the civil case ... pending felony charges will require [defendant] to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-inc "may well have been a departure from the essential requirements of law."); Kanl v. , 621 So. 2d 750, 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (Defendant "sought, and receiv ders abating and staying the proceedings pending the outcome of potential crimi IN brg eased on the same acts giving rise to the civil litigation," third applications d for admissions," requiring "q the Fifth Amendment objection in re herein, application of the six fact the Doe Case. n defendant's response to "requests -question objection detailing challenged question."). As further set forth a stay of the instant case pending the outcome of + +#### 1. The issuesin the ential criminal and civil cases overlap. + +Overlap be important fact (citing an 203 ( e issues in parallel civil and criminal proceedings is the most ding whether to stay civil proceedings. Walsh, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 527 Milton Pollack, Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings, 129 F.R.D. 201, P]erfect symmetry" between criminal and civil proceedings is not, however, required to stay a civil case pending the resolution of a criminal case. See Peterson v. Matlock, 2011 WL 5416571, \*4 (D.N.J. Nov. 7, 2011) (granting stay despite lack of complete overlap in issues). Rather, greater overlap between the issues strengthens the case for a stay because greater overlap increases the risk of self-incrimination. Trustees, 886 F. Supp. at 1138. Here, overlap between the issues in this case and the criminal case is substantial and the risks to Mr. Epstein + +are significant if the case is not stayed. If the petitioners in the Doe Case undo Mr. Epstein's NPA, he is at risk of being criminally prosecuted for allegations of: (1) violations of conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §2422(b); (2) violations of conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §2423(b); (3) violations of 18 U.S.C. §§2422(b); (4) violations of 2423(b); and (5) violations of 1591(aX1), stemming from conduct alleged to have occurred over the span of many years. Additionally, Mr. Epstein would also be at risk of potential prosecution for allegations of money 4 la dering and other related offenses that were also encompassed by the United States o ' Office investigation. Indeed, in the Doe case Mr. alleged that Mr. Epste edly sexually assaulted more than forty (40) young girls on numerous occasions," • them District of Florida prosecutors had prepared a draft indictment of Mr. Epstein,titis strongly indicative of the charges Mr. Epstein may face if Mr. Plaintiffs" Statement of Undisputed Facts, Doe v. Un• , No. 08-cv-80736-K.AM, Doc. 291-15, at 1-2, 5, and 11. y rescinds the NPA. See + +In the instant case, Mr. Messes not any witnesses to establish a malicious prosecution claim, but rathe such as who was a central witness in the Government's crin aljgn igation of Mr. Epstein, one of the two Jane Does from Doe v United States, as who was the litigant in v Maxwell whe r. Eps n's Fifth Amendment assertion as a witness was upheld, see Fifth Amended and. Supblemental Witness List of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff just these three witnesses — each a person who will clearly claim, based on their p ony and on their allegations in the Doe Case itself, that Mr. Epstein violated federa statutes in his relationship with them — Mr. , himself, is asserting into this litigation the overlap between this case and the criminal case, showing that the overlap weighs in favor of a stay. Mr. has also identified a large number of exhibits that relate to the underlying criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein. These exhibits and testimony regarding the allegations that Mr. Epstein engaged in criminal conduct, including those which are squarely within the core of the NPA protections, are the subject of Mr. Epstein's Omnibus Motion in + +Limine, filed on September 25, 2017. Absent this Honorable Court granting Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine in all respects, there is a striking and encompassing overlap of issues that strongly favors the requested stay. Further, Mr. Epstein's potential criminal exposure for money laundering charges at the threat of Mr. impairs his ability to respond to questions relevant to Mr. request for punitive damages, including questions about finances, net worth, financial, and monetary transactions, see infra at 14-15. + +Support for a stay of civil proceedings is strongest after a criminal in as been handed down. Walsh, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 527. It is at this point that the arm of selfincrimination is greatest. However, lack of pending criminal charges tinguish the risk of self-incrimination, especially when the potential for criminal char "warming" up. Afro-Lecon, Inc., 820 F. 2d at 1204; see also Brock, 109 F.R Kashi, 790 F.2d 1050. As owards Mr. Epstein's criminal prosecution for nearly a decade. It is solely a r t r efforts that Mr. Epstein is now at significant risk of losing his NPA and findi facing further criminal prosecution. The potential of a further criminal prosecue f Mr pstein is real, not speculative, See Doe Case, Dkt 189; Doe, 950 F. Supp. 2d 1 2 us this factor should weigh heavily in his favor. Further, neither the Governm e public are prejudiced by the stay (as ordinarily they would be if a criminal p ecution is delayed despite speedy trial interests that the Government protects and that desi to serve the public, see 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.). Here, the Government o y invalidation of the NPA in the Doe v United States proceedings and has no int' half of itself or the public in speedy civil litigation. detailed above, Mr. and his clients have bee \ 3 + +### he Plaintiff's interest in proceeding expeditiously is outweighed by the risk of harm to Mr. Epstein. + +The third factor considers a plaintiff's interest in proceeding expeditiously against the prejudice caused by the delay. A plaintiff must come forward with more than speculative assertions of prejudice or claims of spoliation due to the requested delay of their monetary litigation to avoid a stay. See Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Zuberi, 2015 WL 5823025,'7 (D.N.J. Oct. 1, 2015) (declining to infer that defendants would destroy evidence or dissipate + +assets). Neither the hypothetical risk of loss of evidence due to the passage of lime nor any other argument to advance the civil proceeding at a time when Mr. Epstein cannot fully defend himself are sufficient justifications to outweigh Mr. Epstein's interests in protecting his constitutional rights and obtaining a stay. Id. The prejudice to plaintiff caused by a stay of this case will be minimal and is a direct result of the plaintiff's own actions; attempts to rescind the NPA. Clearly, Mr. prosecutorial goals and Mr. Epstein's well-found ear of the possibility of future allegations in criminal prosecutions are the reason fora y these proceedings. Mr. should not be allowed to attack, through theme litigation that he himself delayed for years to pursue monetary damages for his rgciedi se ual clients, see Doe Case, Dkt 189 at 5; Doe, 950 F. Supp. 2d at 1265-66, and now a that a stay would cause an undue delay in litigating his own claims. The plaint j oney damages for acts that have already occurred. Plaintiff's monetary interests otected by the ability to recover pre-judgment interest, Walsh, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 52 ards faces no risk of Mr. Epstein avoiding any unfavorable judgment. See G rmn mployees Ins. Co., 2015 WL 582302 at \*7; al also Citibank, N.A. v. L 1335, at \*2 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). Mr. damage claims would suffer no p d to a delay given that he enjoys a successful life as a lawyer but, more importantl he is the architect of the current tension between the pending civil litigation lif has itiribrought and Mr. Epstein's principled Fifth Amendment rights which are at their tess ce when he will be asked about the subject matter that is currently within the i t i ty 'visions of the NPA. + +## urdens on Mr. Epstein warrant a stay. + +, e burdens on Mr. Epstein of litigating in a civil forum are significant. Notably, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them: the Amendment does not preclude the inference where the privilege is claimed by a party to a civil cause." Baxter v. Pahnigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318-19 (1976). Mr. Epstein should not be compelled to choose between waiving his Fifth Amendment rights and defending himself in the civil lawsuit or + +asserting the privilege and risking an adverse inference in a monetary civil case. Even were the plaintiff through counsel, to agree (which they have not) that no adverse inference should arise from Mr. Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment rights — a position contrary to his current position where he is fully intending to seek adverse inferences from Fifth Amendment assertions' — Mr. Epstein would nevertheless suffer the consequences of being unable to advance affirmative defenses to the civil allegations thus absent a stay ability to defend himself will be deeply jeopardized. Currently pending before this Co parties' Motions for Summary Judgment and Mr. Motion to Compel IvJra.\$p i 's responses to discovery requests. Mr. through his counsel, has re pstein's offer to stipulate to his net worth as evidenced by portions of his tax re Email September 2, 2017 Email from Jack Scarola, attached hereto as Exhibit , Mr. is attempting to force Mr. Epstein to stipulate to an uncorrobora ted net worth figure or for Mr. Epstein to waive his Fifth Amendment rights to discovery requests for additional net worth information. Likewise, Mr. E ttempting to preclude Mr. Epstein from defending against the pending claims i ing king this Court, as a result of Mr. Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendm ri Ito strike his affidavit in support of his summary judgement request.' Given t the A protects against charges which would require, as an essential element, proof f mone and financial transactions and resources, Mr. Epstein's + +Indeed, Mr. Edwa Epstein's asserti has n actively pursuing an adverse inference as a result of Mr. his F. h Amendment rights: + +MR. L : ... He faces potential criminal liability. We are not trying to ov Fifth Amendment privilege. But I want to overrule all the other , I want them eliminated, so that when we are before a jury the single p ege that has been asserted is a Fifth Amendment privilege, and, as I have exp fined to the Court before, it's our position that that will enable us to draw adverse inferences from those assertions and argue those adverse inferences before the jury. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, 25. (emphasis added). et al., No. 50-2009-CA-040800-AG, 04/22/2013 Tr., at 10,11 14- + +' At the September 6, 2017 status conference, Mr. Mitttorney asked this Court to strike Mr. Epstein's affidavit and renewed his requests to compe r. Epstein' gaigg to interrogatories and document production requests. Epstein v. Rothstein, , et at, No. 50- 2009-CA-040800-AG, 09/06/17 Tr., at 13-15. + +responses to questions concerning his finances could lead to potential criminal exposure exposure due solely to Mr. efforts to rescind the NPA. See Parallel Proceedings, 129 F.R.D. at 205-06 (noting that courts in civil matters can exclude evidence withheld by party on Fifth Amendment grounds). Temporarily staying the proceedings in this case avoids placing Mr. Epstein in the untenable position of either waiving his rights and exposing himself to criminal liability or foregoing a full defense to the instant allegations. + +## 4. The interests of the court support a stay. + +The convenience of the Court in the management of its cases and • e of judicial resources support a limited stay pending the resolution of the . "[E]xpeditious resolution of cases is, as a general matter, preferable to delay of th 's docket." S.E.C. v. Alexander, No. 10-CV-04535-LHK, 2010 WL 5388000 D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010). However, a number of courts have concluded that sta civil proceeding in its early stages "may prove more efficient in the long r p because the "stay will allow civil discovery to proceed unobstructed by co arding self-incrimination." Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Ed Wilds has identified Mr. Epstein as a witness he ded and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff at 1. Assuming Mr Zrpstein were to assert the Fifth Amendment, there would intends to depose and call, see be complex litigation ov isziir when an answer would warrant an adverse inference. Assuming he answered some, bu of a questions, inevitable litigation will occur regarding waiver and the legitimacy of o1 his Fifth Amendment while not striking the answers that will likely require to bring question-by-question challenges to the Court's attention for resolu to Court would thus be forced to decide "a constant stream of privilege issues." Walsh, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 528-29. Staying the proceedings until the resolution of the Doe Case will potentially avoid many of these objections and allow Mr. Epstein to consider his privilege objections on a subject-by-subject basis. + +# 5. The public interest supports a stay. + +The final factor balances the public's interest, if any, in achieving expeditious resolution of the civil proceeding versus the harm to defendants if a stay is denied. Here, there is no compelling public interest that justifies denial of a stay. This case is not brought by a government agency or in a parens patriae capacity. See United States v. Certain Real Property, 751 F. Supp. 1060, 1062 (E.D.N.Y. 1989) (distinguishing between enforcement action brought to enforce consumer protection or other statutes and less impactful civil matters). L ewise, this is a not a securities matter or drug labeling case, where the operation of a mark r ing of a drug is at issue. CI Parallel Proceedings, 129 F.R.D. at 205. This is a pri plaintiff seeks only money damages. There is no ongoing injury ction and the seeks to cure on behalf of the public. Pursuing monetary damage claims are n ' the public interest. Furthermore, the public has an interest in "ensuring that by ongoing civil cases. Douglas v. United States, 200 20 :375, at \* 6 (N.D. Cal. July 17, Staso ned that where there are parallel of primary importance to the public," 2006) (internal citation omitted). Indeed, criminal and civil proceedings, "the crime c whereas the civil case, which will only n monetary damages, "is not of an equally pressing nature." Alexander, 2010 0 at \*6 (citations omitted). Thus, this factor, too, supports Mr. Epstein's reque4tr tay of civil proceedings until the Doe Case is fully resolved. process is not subverted" + +# IV. CONCLUS N + +Based on the foregoing, Mr. Epstein hereby respectfully requests this Honorable Court to jln otar y stay the above-captioned proceedings pending the outcome of the Doe Case. + +/s/ Jack Goldberger, Esq. + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergerQaewna.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th of October, 2017. + +> /s/ Jack Goldberger, Esq. Jack Goldberger, Esq + +### SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx®searcylaw.com; mcp®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger®agwpa.com; snaahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA S 250 Australian Ave. South West Palm Bcach, FL 33401 AL Suite 1400 + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG OS, + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +J. Esq. athtojustice. Jaffe We' g Ed Fistos Lehrman Andrews v e, Suite 2 Fort Laude n 33301 + +Fred Had Dec® adLaw.com 315 SE 7t treet, Suite 301 Fort Laude le, FL 33301 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling®tonjahaddad.com Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..643902bd8a82c9cc27c754a0de2470d087ea3f0b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981/EFTA02759981.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,833 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759981.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 34919, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PIAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEI O,TION FOR \nTEMPORARY STAY OF PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 269.602 + ], + [ + 514.5615844726562, + 269.602 + ], + [ + 514.5615844726562, + 297.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 297.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 195.39642333984375, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 195.39642333984375, + 635.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 635.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IL MR. EPS HA A VALID FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 442.6619873046875, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 442.6619873046875, + 515.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 515.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IILTHIS HONORABLE COURT SHOULD TEMPORARILY STAY DINGS \nPENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE DOE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 516.9059448242188, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 516.9059448242188, + 264.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 264.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. The issuesin the \nential criminal and civil cases overlap.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 447.021240234375, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 447.021240234375, + 491.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 491.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "he Plaintiff's interest in proceeding expeditiously is outweighed by the risk \nof harm to Mr. Epstein.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 599.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 599.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "urdens on Mr. Epstein warrant a stay.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 373.5981140136719, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 373.5981140136719, + 564.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 564.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. The interests of the court support a stay.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 355.2928466796875, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 355.2928466796875, + 227.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 227.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. The public interest supports a stay.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 327.85015869140625, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 327.85015869140625, + 683.983024597168 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 683.983024597168 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. CONCLUS N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 192.1507568359375, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 192.1507568359375, + 516.363037109375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 516.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 98.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 98.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 227.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 227.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759981" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..348024e6d5527d590bfdb2dd5507846d331d279a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.md @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT; c l) I' EPSTEIN'S FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, Ifiiiii J. FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM + +S:', + +THIS CAUSE having come to co sidcred upon PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTE \*, ' DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTI ,, FO RY JUDGMENT ON J. FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM, and the Court'having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDE DJUDGED: SAM "forto4, 45' 1)eAvP7) F -OR EC + +E AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Co nty, Florida, this day of , 2017. + +> ALD H FELE IR UIT J 'GE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached ounsel I's + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on +Fourth Amended Counterclaim + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on +Fourth Amended Counterclaim + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fbd3a2e4a043c88a0b1b159627a0b4f58d95960 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997/EFTA02759997.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02759997.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3043, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT; c l) I' EPSTEIN'S\nFOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, Ifiiiii \nJ. FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 329.973 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 329.973 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 373.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 373.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 167.67000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02759997" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f900cfb8e351387a26c787eb14ec8f50a395e31 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES** + +██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded by Jeffrey Epstein on September 5, 2017, and said Answers to Interrogatories have been furnished to the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of October, 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [\\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:_scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6256ad4f213b2e460e19ad9cb747f1d196c113a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000/EFTA02760000.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760000.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2838, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 323.35699999999997 + ], + [ + 474.29999999999995, + 323.35699999999997 + ], + [ + 474.29999999999995, + 337.416 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 337.416 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 379.44, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 379.44, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 133.65 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760000" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14f10a14aa671c0de7d9518532585f5c80db3df9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.md @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCO"FI RorilSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR P ODUCTION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF + +J. by and through his ndersigned attorneys and pursuant to Rule 1.350, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, here nds to Jeffrey Epstein's, Request for Production dated September 5, 2017 as folio + +- 1. Objection. Attorne or product. +- 2. Objection. erence to "the period in question" is undefined, vague and ambigt the request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, al, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evi ence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. +- 3. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. + +- 4. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; a mey-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financ +- 5. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks inform is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to t fe di ery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attornpntork product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected) by riglts to financial privacy. 2 N +- 6. Objection. The request is overly broacrarid N \seas information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated ' to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requcSt d includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information; rmation protected by rights to financial privacy. +- 7. Objection. The req st is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, a reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evide information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client d 4 information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. ection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. + +1. 9. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. +2. 10. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of October, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response to Epstein's Request for Production served 9.5.17 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41e08ba7502d0cc9652672899829fa9981e05e42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003/EFTA02760003.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760003.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5698, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR P ODUCTION TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 466.1131896972656, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 466.1131896972656, + 377.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 377.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 143.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760003" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760007/EFTA02760007.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760007/EFTA02760007.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73a5de11707281a9399b3b35bd093416b1a68aa8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760007/EFTA02760007.md @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J, Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN' ON FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO VIOLATION OF CONFIDE A EMENT AGREEMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE t A AND HIS COUNS] + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Ep and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion requesting that th o ction Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. ('it') and his co- l this case, Jack Scarola ("Scarola"), for their flagrant violation of the confidenti • a ents between Epstein and clients L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, as well e e Order of entitlement to costs and attorneys' fees in favor of Epstein and against Ed{yardsl d Scarola. In support thereof, Epstein states: + +## tali.' INTRODUCTION + +As this C is a , represented three clients in civil suits against Epstein; E.W., L.M., d e Doe. Each of these parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Gener ("Agreement") in July 2010. As an express term and condition thereof, each Party agreed to confidentiality provisions, to which each party and his or her attorneys were bound. The germane portions of each of the Agreements provides as follows: + +- 4. Reciprocal Confidentiality. The Parties agree that the amount of this settlement shall be kept strictly confidential and shall not be disclosed at any + +time to any third party, except: (a) to the extent required by law or rule; (b) to the extent necessary in connection with medical treatment, legal, financial, accounting or tax services, or appropriate tax reporting purposes (only if neencary); or (c) in response to a validly issued subpoena from a governmental or regulatory agency. Any third party who is advised of the settlement amount must acknowledge that such third party is aware of this confidentiality provision and is bound by it, including the provisions contained in this Settlement Agreement relating to the enforcement of this confidentiality provision. The Parties further agree that the Parties shall not provide any copy, in whole or in part, or in any form, of this Settlement Agreement to any third party, except to the nt required by law or rule or in response to a validly issued subpoena a governmental or regulatory agency. Moreover, neither this Settlement Agreement, nor any copy hereof, nor the terms hereof shall be used or disclosed in any court, arbitration, or other legal proc ttxcept to enforce the provisions of this Settlement Agreement. If iarties are served with a valid subpoena, court order, government agent o or subpoena, or other compulsory legal process, pursuant to which di this Settlement Agreement, the settlement amount, or other to f is requested, or production of the Settlement Agreement is requ t arty so served shall give counsel for the other Party notice the vet in five (5) days of such service and, prior to making any such shall give counsel to such other Party at least ten (10) days to e ce necessary proceedings to obtain a court order preventing, or otherwise restricting such disclosure, provided that the Subp or er does not require compliance in less than 15 days. Should compl s than 15 days, the Party to whom the request is made shall use J aC efforts to request additional time for compliance. + +5. Enforcement. s Se lament Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In vent of litigation arising out of a dispute over the interpretation of ement Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover t cost of itigation, including attorneys' fees and other reasonable costs of tion. e Parties (and any third party) agree that the courts of the 15th J al uit of Palm Beach County shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the s • tter and shall have personal jurisdiction over the Parties (and third the event of an enforcement matter the First Parties (and any third ily member) agree that J. is authorized to accept se for them, and Robert D. Critton, Jr. is authorized to accept service for Jeffrey Epstein. First and Second Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that if either First or Second Parties allege that a breach of the confidentiality provision has occurred, the aggrieved First or Second Parties may seek an appropriate remedy with the Court. If the Court finds a breach of the confidentiality provision set forth above, the Court shall determine the amount of the award. Equitable remedies are not relinquished by virtue of this provision; nor does either Party relinquish the right to pursue any other legal or equitable damages to which (s)he may be entitled as a result of the other Party's breach, including, but not limited to, prevailing party costs, to include attorneys' fees. + +See Agreements, which will be provided to the Court in camera. + +In this case, not only disclosed the amounts for which these cases were settled in his Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, see Opposition Motion filed pp. 3-4 (Filing Number 61965438), but also attached, as an E his own Motion, unverified answers to Epstein's Interrogatories, in w ain discloses the confidential amounts for which the cases settled; in direct o tilt ration to both the Interrogatories posed to him and the Agreements by which he Aci i n + +Moreover, Scarola provided direct commentary A(tte regarding the confidential Agreements (including his usual derogatory and t ' iiiiit u ket notations about Epstein and his counsel) and his disclosure of this informati s , papers. See Palm Beach Daily News Article dated October 3, 2017, which w' pro 'ded to the Court in camera. Such commentary is also a violation of the Agreeme e reements. Consequently, and as demonstrated more fully below, sanctions and attor eys s are warranted. + +thtillir settlement agreements "are favored as a means to conserve judicial resources urts will enforce them when it is possible to do so." Spiegel v. H. Holme , So. 2d 295, 297 (Ha. 4th DCA 2002) (citing Long Term Mgmt., Inc. v. Univ. Nursing Or., Inc., 704 So.2d 669, 673 (Ha. 1st DCA 1997)). Likewise, "EiIt is well settled law + +# MEMORANDUM OF LAW + +Indeed, the only responses provided in these unverified Answers to Interrogatories that were not solely objections or assertions of privilege were self-serving responses that were clearly not called for b interrogatories; to wit: the amounts of settlement received from the E stein cases and an assertion that was not a partner at RRA. Moreover, even if this Court can believe that had any question at all regarding the propriety of disclosing this information, the Agreements provide the procedure he is to follow; which he did not do. See Agreements. + +that '[a] stipulation properly entered into and relating to a matter upon which it is appropriate to stipulate is binding upon the parties and upon the Court.'" Hufcor/Gulfstream, Inc. v. Homestead Concrete & Drainage, Inc., 831 So. 2d 767, 769 (Ha. 4th DCA 2002) (citing v. M, 663 So. 2d 663, 664-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)); Mufloz Hnos., S.A. v. Editorial Televisa Intern., S.A., 121 So. 3d 100, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Consequently, "where contracts are clear and unambiguous, they should be construed as written, and the court can give no other meaning." Gulliver Sch., Inc. v. Snay, 137 So. 3d 1045, 1047-48 (Fla. . 2014); Intl Expositions, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 274 So. 2d 29, 30-31 (Fl 1973) (when the parties to a settlement agreement bargain for and specify d conditions of their agreement, "it is not the Court's prerogative to substitute it j ent for that of the parties in order to relieve one from an alleged hardship of an ' Als, ' t bargain."). Alit t + +i tgiv d for both the law and the Agreements, responded to the two Interrogatories tr . , objecting on a series of purported grounds; asserting privileges; providing tmimproper and impermissible "without waiving said objection;2" and finally, provi ng his sole answer, a list of each of his three afore-mentioned plaintiffs with the amoun ein paid to these plaintiffs to settle each claim: In this case, + +30. Fo ch payment or distribution made by you and/or your law firm, any e w which you are affiliated. or pursuant to a joint agreement, rega ing e proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection wick ttlement of claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the ayee, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. Include in + +2 Christie v. HiXSOll. 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); v. Island Resorts Development, Inc., 22 FLW Fed. D443, n, \*3 (N.D. Fla. 2009) ("unverified" answers to interrogatories failed to describe with specificity documents responsive to interrogatories in violation of rule; responding party not allowed to object to interrogatory but then answer subject to objection). + +your response the aggregate amount of such proceeds of settlement for each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe retained by you and/or your law firm, the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to the reimbursement of expenses, the amount of such retained proceeds retained by your law firm as its share of any contingency fee, and the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to you as distinguished from your law firm (whether or not paid to you) as your share of the fee payable. + +31. State, identify, and describe with particularity any and all gust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements, or similar arrangements, including accounts established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration, and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW. or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response a description of the agreements, contracts and instruments, and all amendmenl'moilifications and supplements thereto pursuant to which such arrangem wareestablished, the dates of the same, the names, addresses, email add telephone numbers of all settlors, grantors, trustees, guardians, cu • ther fiduciaries, and beneficiaries (including, without limitation, n e beneficiaries) of such arrangements, the names of the account a names of the authorized signatories, the account numbers and the sses, telephone numbers of individual contacts of the financial ' for all accounts established to receive and hold such proceeds of se ien + +See Exhibit A to Oppositio (emphasis added). + +First, it is evident fro r e)ep gatories posed that the information requested was regarding the disbursement o settlement funds once received by behalf of his clien the amou or his firm on does the Interrogatory request the amount paid by Epstein to , it is incredulous to think that Epstein would request from to settle these cases; he is the one who paid them. Rather, and Scarola, sQI h brazen disregard for the Agreements, the laws germane to them, and for Epstein's rights thereunder, have breached the Agreements by knowingly disclosing these amounts; and did so for the purpose of making these settlements public to further interests in this litigation and to create more sensationalized headlines about Epstein as trial rapidly approaches; egregious conduct warranting an award of both sanctions and attorneys' fees. + +Next, the law is clear that Interrogatory responses are not filed with the court absent certain circumstances. Rule 1.340(e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure specifically references Rule 2.425 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration and Rule 1.280(g) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and requires a party to show that "good causr is before filing any Interrogatories in a matter. Such good cause includes seeking .nses to the Interrogatories, or compelling a party to answer them3. Id. In add' e with the nowincorporated Rule 2.425 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Ad, Ira the practitioner must ensure that any Interrogatories filed with the court have nfidential information before filing the discovery material. Indisputably, the se agreement; one that is specifically not perm would be such information required to c sayac ount of a confidential settlement disclosed pursuant to said Agreements, and Scarola failed to do so. + +Moreover, it is rudimen separately and fully, in writin oath[J" and "signed by the party giving the answers." F . R.Civ. P. 1.340(a) Unverified Interrogatories; ones not submitted under oath, are deemed unansw answers to Interrogatories that he filed with the Court were not si swered under oath. Accordingly, these unverified answers to Interrogatories attach ards's Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment are deemed nonanswers, as well as hearsay, and are not even permitted evidence upon which a party can rely in summary judgment motions or oppositions thereto under Rule 1.510(c) of the Florida Rules of 1 answers to Interrogatories must be "answered + +3 On September 25, 2017, and Scarola filed four (4) separate Motions to overrule Objections and Compel better Answers to discovery served upon Epstein. Each of these Motions, however, failed to attach or incorporate a single question or response for which it sought answers or better responses. + +Civil Procedure. The plain language of Rule 1.510 expressly "excludes from consideration on a motion for summary judgment, any document that is not one of the enumerated documents or is not a certified attachment to a proper affidavit." Bifulco v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 693 So. 2d 707, 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (specifically denying consideration of unverified documents, stating that "[a]t this point in time, they're nothing more than unverified hearsay, which cannot be considered by the Court ..."); First Union Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. 589, 591 (Ha. 5th DCA 2001) ("[M]erely attaching an unworn document the procedural strictures inherent in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1 85 So. 2d of . . . satisfy + +Scarola and are veteran trial attorneys, are w w these Rules, and are more than familiar with the significance of maintainin WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1. | Jeffrey Epstein | +| 2. | ██████████ (formerly Kellen)
c/o John Stephenson
1201 W. Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30339 | +| 3. | Nadia Marcinkova
c/o Erica Dubno
767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600
New York, New York 10017 | +| 4. | Virginia ██████████
c/o Stan Pottinger
49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100
South Salem NY 10590 | +| 5. | ██████████
c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq.
MINTZ & GOLD LLP
600 Third Avenue, 25 th Floor,
New York 10016 | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. Page 2 of 20 + +| 6. |

c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq.
MINTZ & GOLD LLP
600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor,
New York, 10016

| +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 7. |

[REDACTED]
13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800
Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449

| +| 8. |

[REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA,
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800,
MIAMI, FL 33131

| +| 9. |

Robert Josefsberg, Esquire
PODHURST ORSECK, PA,
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800,
MIAMI, FL 33131

| +| 10. |

Detective [REDACTED] Recarey
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

| +| 11. |

Chief Michael Reiter
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

| +| 12. |

John Connolly
c/o Simon & Schuster
1230 6th Avenue
New York, New York 10020

| +| 13. |

Charles Lichtman, Esquire
350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

| +| 14. |

William Scherer, Esquire
633 S Federal Hwy #800
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

| +| 15. |

Antonio [REDACTED] (Tony)
Palm Coast, Florida

| +| 16. |

Records Custodian of Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

| + +eADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 302009CA040800XXXXIABAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff Page 3 of 20 + +| 17. | Records Custodian of United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 18. | Records Custodian of the Federal Bureau of Investigations | +| 19. | Spencer Kuvin, Esquire | +| 20. | Theodore Leopold, Esquire Aett | +| 21. | Rinaldo Rizzo | +| | 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor | +| 22. | Adam Horowitz, Esquire | +| | FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 IS C9C) | +| 23. | Isidro M. = Esquire | +| 24. | All of the Lawyers who Rep t ictims of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 25. | Adriana Mu& ska | +| | 1040 Sout ore D ve | +| | Miami h, 33141 | +| 26. | Lan o Tho | +| | c/o k Times | +| | Ne ork, NY 10018 | +| 27. | Oren Kramer | +| 28. | LaVecchio | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. Page 4 of 20 + +| 29. | c/o Brad [REDACTED], Jaffe Weissing
425 North Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30. | Evgenia Ignatieva
1650 Broadway, #910
New York, NY 10019 | +| 31. | [REDACTED]
536 N. Edinburgh Avenue,
Los Angeles, CA 90048 | +| 32. | Angelique [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 33. | [REDACTED]
c/o Jack Scarola
SEARCY DENNEY, ET AL.
2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409 | +| 34. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 35. | Brandy Brenson c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 | +| 36. | Molly Smythe
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 37. | [REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 | +| 38. | [REDACTED]
c/o [REDACTED], Esq.
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff Page 5 of 20 + +| | FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 39. | Paul Cassell, Esq.
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 | +| 40. | [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 41. | [REDACTED]
1212 N. Clark Street
West Hollywood, CA 90069 | +| 42. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 43. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 44. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 45. | Prince Andrew Albert Christian [REDACTED]
Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road
London SW1A 1AA | +| 46. | Frederic Fekkai
Address Currently Unknown | +| 47. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 48. | Lesley Groff
c/o Mike [REDACTED] | + +MEW. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Countaplaintiff J. Page 6 of 20 + +| New York, NY 10036 | 1114 Avenue of the Americas | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 49. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart | 505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 | +| West Palm Beach, FL 33401 do Adam Horowitz | A...1 JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 | +| MIAMI, FL 33131 | CO AS FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 | +| | frS C) | +| 52. Meagan Dorshel | do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA | +| 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STES(..... MIAMI, FL 33131 do Adam Horowitz | Sp, | +| JAFFE, WEI | IN , ET AL. | +| 425 N ANDREW AVE., | TE 2 | +| FL LAUDERDAL | 3301 | +| 54. Molly Smythe, | | +| do Robert sto | berg, Esq. | +| POD | O ECK, PA | +| 25 A | ER STREET, STE 800 | +| 55. ToZf,Meister | | +| 101 eminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480 MIAMI, IL 33131 | do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. | + +| | PODHURST ORSECK, PA,
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 58. | [REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 | +| 59. | [REDACTED]
c/o Marshall Dore Louis
40 NW third Street, Suite 200
Miami, FL 33128 | +| 60. | Jason Richards
Federal Bureau of Investigation
16320 NW 2 nd AVE., MIAMI, FL 33169 | +| 61. | [REDACTED]
c/o [REDACTED] Esq.
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2,
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 62. | [REDACTED]
c/o [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 63. | [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 64. | Virginia Alvarez
c/o Adam Horowitz
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 65. | [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 66. | Nezbitt Kurkendall
Federal Bureau of Investigation
16320 NW 2 nd AVE. | + +I IADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 8 of 20 + +| | MIAMI, FL 33169 | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 67. |

██████████
c/o Isidro M. ██████████
██████████ Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

| +| 68. | Igor Zinoview
Address Crently Unknown | +| 69. | ██████████
Address Currently Unknown | +| 70. | ██████████
9 East 71 Street
New York, NY 10021 | +| 71. | Seth Lehrman
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 72. | Matt Weissing
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 73. | Maria Villafana
500 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| 74. | Any additional individuals identified as victims by the United states Attorney's Office and whose identities were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list supplied as it related to the NPA | +| 75. | Leslie Wexner
Three Limited Parkway
Columbus, Ohio 43206 | +| 76. | Donald Trump
c/o Alan Garten, Esq.
725 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10022 | +| 77. | Larry Visoski
1131 PINE POINT ROAD
RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 78. | Maritza Vasquez
1293 SW 21 st Terrace
Miami, FL 33145 | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Countetplaintiff J. Page 9 of 20 + +| 79. | Maximilia | +|-----|-------------------------------------| +| 81. | C .)O ..' | +| 83. | David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin | +| | WEST PALM BEACH, 3 4 4) w | +| 85. | Michael Fisten | +| | Weston, FL Iczoily | +| 86. | Adler | +| | Delray Bea L | +| | 6791 F IR A LAKES DR. | +| | BO ACH, FL 33472 | +| 88. | asiak | +| | 358 L BRILLO WAY | +| 89. | Beata Banasiak | +| 90. | Juan Alessi | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff 1. Page I 0 of 20 + +| 91. | Michael | +|----------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 92. | Jerry Goldsmith | +| 93. | Rosalie NMI | +| 94. | Valdson Cotrin | +| 96. | Cecelia n | +| 97. | Glenn | +| | 1040 5TH AVE UNIT 15A ? S S) NEW YORK, NY 10028-0137 | +| 98. | Abigail Wexner | +| 99. | Officer Munyan | +| | Palm Beach Police ent | +| | 345 South Co ty '... • | +| | Palm Beac L 334. I | +| 100. Officer , | of | +| | Pal : 01414' olice Department | +| | 34 0-4. unty Road | +| 101. Sgt. | rge | +| | Palm 13each, FL 33480 | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. Page I I of 20 + +| 104. | Pagnano | +|-----------|-------------------------| +| CAMBRIDGE | 02138-1802 | +| ST | VI 00802 | +| | CP S | +| | S ;C) | +| | S/A Witness #I05 S | +| 110. Wil | "Bill" | +| | 'S .66°' | +| | 1345 AVENUE OF TH RICAS | +| | NEW YORK, NE ORK 10105 | +| 101 SEM | E A | +| PALM | L 33480 | +| 113. Todd | eist. | +| 101 | LE AVE | +| 114. Pres | nt William J. Clinton | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XMCPalm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | Michele Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 119. | Amy Fortimer
12309 N OLD COUNTRY RD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414 | +| 120. | [REDACTED]
545 E 5TH ST APT 6E
NEW YORK, NY 10009 | +| 121. | [REDACTED]
971 NW FRESCO WAY APT 208
JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957 | +| 122. | [REDACTED]
3139 Kingston Court,
West Palm Beach, Florida | +| 123. | [REDACTED]
9 PINTA RD
MIAMI FL 33133-2607 | +| 124. | Latasha Lowe
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 125. | Melissa Hanes
115 Sunshine Blvd
West Palm Beach, Florida | +| 126. | Zack Bryan
1150 Larch Way
Wellington, Florida | +| 127. | [REDACTED]
925 W AVENUE 37
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065-3241 | +| 128. | Larry [REDACTED]
11148 COBBLEFIELD DR. | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff IM Page 13 of 20 + +| | WELLINGTON, FL 33449 | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 129. | Story Cowles
801 S OLIVE AVE UNIT 201S
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 130. | Alan Dershowitz
26 RESERVOIR ST
CAMBRIDGE, ██ 02138
or
TUDOR CITY PL
APT 7K
NEW YORK, NY 10017 | +| 131. | Michael Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 132. | Salaam Kahlid Monroe
119 MENORES AVE APT 3
CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 | +| 133. | Jelitza Negrette
503 CHANDLERS WARF
PORTLAND, ME 04101 | +| 134. | Sergia ██
825 BRICKELL BAY DR., #1141
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 135. | Cassandra ██
5011 EL CLARO CIRCLE
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 | +| 136. | Randee Speciale
PALM BEACH VICTIM SERVICES
205 N DIXIE HIGHWAY # 5.1100
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 137. | Nicole ██
Address Currently Unknown | +| 138. | Steven Hoffenberg
Address Currently Unknown | +| 139. | Michael Stroll
Address Currently Unknown | +| 140. | Douglas Shoettle
243 Riverside, Dr.
New York, NY 10025 | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. Page 14 of 20 + +| 141. | Ghislaine Maxwell
Address Currently Unknown | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 142. | Records Custodian
Amazon | +| 143. | Records Custodian
Yellow Cab | +| 144. | Records Custodian
Citrix Systems, Inc. | +| 145. | Records Custodian
Federal Bureau of Investigation | +| 146. | Records Custodian
Milton Girls Juvenile Facility
5770 EAST MILTON ROAD
MILTON, FL | +| 147. | Records Custodian
School District of Palm Beach County
3344 FOREST ██████ BLVD, SUITE C-124
West Palm Beach, FL 33406 | +| 148. | Records Custodian
St. Mary's Medical Center
901 45 th STREET
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| 149. | Records Custodian
WELLINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL
10104 FORREST HILL BLVD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414 | +| 150. | All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff, | +| 151. | All rebuttal witnesses. | +| 152. | All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. | +| | WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF
DEPOSITION | +| 153. | Mark Epstein
30 VANDAM STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10013 | +| 154. | ██████████
c/o Alan S. ██████████, Esq. | +| 155. | ██████████ | + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. + +Page 15 of 20 + +| | 358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, FL 33480 | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 156. | Alfredo Rodriguez
11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL
C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons | +| 157. | Scott Rothstein
c/o Mark Nurik
One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | + +158. Jeffrey Epstein + +Plaintiff reserves the right to amend X • IIISHS9 + +## EXPERT: + +159. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a t (d copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached li day of adare-r 2017. + +AROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 mep@searcylaw.com 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +I ██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff ██████████ J. E ██████████ +Page 16 of 20 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. E ██████████ + +William Chester ██████████ Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Sixth Amended Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. Page 17 of 20 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 Fax: (954)437-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire mareuriklaw.com Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 S ic Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-745-3556 CO .- Attorneys for Scott Rothstein iS5) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760018/EFTA02760018.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760018/EFTA02760018.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..716d5e44de7877664153ed421e830ca401314e22 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760018/EFTA02760018.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,668 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760018.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 28836, + "elapsed_seconds": 21.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SIXTH AMENDED WITNESS LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. EDWARDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 322.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 322.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 349.82099999999997 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 349.82099999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 315.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 315.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 329.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 329.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760018" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..629c2e4785840dcd20c38a5ff9d10e3c29a742be --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.md @@ -0,0 +1,388 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. S individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +CO ASA + +# REVISED c EXHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLA4s + +COMES NOW the Counterplaintiff, BRAD I ARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys and hereby lists his exhibits for trial aA fo ss:\ , + +| DEF. PLF. DATE NO. NO. OFFERED | wc.)1,..yr4 DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS EXHIBITS EXPECTED TO BE USED | +|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| t | ar | +| I. ft | All applicable criminal statutes | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes All applicable Rules of Evidence | +| 4. | Video of Jeffrey Epstein's home and route from victim to Epstein's home | +| 5. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books | + +adv. Epstein + +### HIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, + +lifilirkge 2 of 13 + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | +|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARK ADMIT | +| | TED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS Abernathy: | +| | A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their ers" | +| 6. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | +| 7. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | +| 8. | Messages taken from m g and at Epstein's home | +| 9 | Documents relate effr pstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epst ' i s | +| I I. | le in one records | +| 12 | 's phone records | +| 13. | ThikVisitation Logs | +| 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file Jeffrey Epstein C'S) | +| 16. t | r. by FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Fp.. Jeffrey Epstein | +| IS | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed | +| 19. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| 10 | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | +| / I | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any and all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | +| -i-i. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## XHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, + +Page 3 of 13 + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARK | ADMITTED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 23 | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | +| | 24 | | | | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 25 | | | | All documents evidencing relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Jean Luc Brunel | +| | 26 | | | | All documents evidencing relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 or any modeling agencies | +| | 27 | | | | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | +| | 28 | | | | 2002 █████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | +| | 29 | | | | 2001 Royal Palm Beach High School Year Book | +| | 30. | | | | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | +| | 31. | | | | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 32 | | | | Tape recording or transcript of recording of conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and █████ Rush | +| | 33. | | | | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | +| | 34. | | | | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 35. | | | | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | +| | 36. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | +| | 37 | | | | Public records from the Department of Corrections related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 38 | | | | Records from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 39. | | | | All statements made by Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 40. | | | | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | +| | 41. | | | | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, | + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XICOMMAG XHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, Page 4 of 13 + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARK | ADMIT TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | 09-81092 | +| | 42 | | | | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802

09-81092 | +| | 43. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | +| | 44. | | | | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein was a plaintiff or defendant | +| | 45. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | +| | 46. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | +| | 47 | | | | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | +| | 48 | | | | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 49. | | | | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | +| | 50. | | | | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | +| | 51. | | | | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes | +| | 52 | | | | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED] | +| | 53. | | | | Audio tape of [REDACTED] | +| | 54. | | | | Photographs, videos and books taken in the search warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 55. | | | | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG XHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, Page 5 of 13 + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | | +|----------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED | MARK ADMIT | | +| | TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 56. | | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victim | +| 57 | | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report o ictim | +| 58 | | Palm Beach Police Department I t Re rt dated 4/20/06 | +| 59. | | All reports and documentati gc d by Palm Beach | +| | | Police Department relat 'to effr Epstein | +| 60. | | All Witness Statements enerated by Palm Beach | +| | | Police Departmen lating tolJeffrey Epstein | +| 61 | | Passenger ts Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight | +| 62 | | Passeng ights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | +| 63. | | m ffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding d project | +| 64. | ,fr | ell_ Epstein's bank statements effrey Epstein's tax returns and Amanda Grant | +| | Ca ) | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | +| | Ii iiiiir | | +| 67. ec | ., | Massage Table | +| 68. O | | warrant | +| 70 | | Computers taken from Jeffrey Epstein's home during search warrant | +| 71. | | Vibrators, dildos and other sex toys taken from Jeffrey Epstein's home during search warrant | +| 72. | | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | +| 73. | | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | + +Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOaNBAG + +#### XHIBIT LIST OF COIJNTERPLAINTIFF, + +Page 6 of 13 + +| DEF. PLF. DATE | | +|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OFFERED MARK | ADMIT | +| TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 74. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community Control and Probation | +| 75. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Rc tion | +| 76. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking ph | +| | 14/ , | +| 77. | CAD calls to 358 EL BILL Y, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | +| 78 | List ofJeffrey E ' 's House contacts | +| 79 | Documentsrel effrey Epstein's investments | +| 80 | Lett f Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler | +| 81 | is es owned by Jeffrey Epstein | +| 82 | to from Guy Fronstin to Assistant tate Attorney dated 1-11-06 | +| 83 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13-06 | +| 84 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 2-17-06 | +| 85 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06 Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-10-06 | +| 87 | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | +| 89 | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for | +| 90 | Ted's Sheds Documents | +| 91. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties | +| 92 | Arrest Warrant of | + +Case No.: 502009CA040800X3C3C3CMBAG + +HIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, + +Page 7 of 13 + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARK | ADMIT TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 93. | | | | Police report regarding ██████████ picking up money dated 11-28-04 | +| | 94. | | | | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | +| | 95. | | | | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | +| | 96. | | | | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | +| | 97 | | | | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | +| | 98 | | | | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | +| | 99 | | | | Jeffrey Epstein Polygraph Test and Results | +| | 100. | | | | Victim's GED testing information and results | +| | 101. | | | | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | +| | 102. | | | | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | +| | 103. | | | | Flight information for ██████████ | +| | 104. | | | | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | +| | 105. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes | +| | 106. | | | | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | +| | 107. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech | +| | 108 | | | | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06 | +| | 109. | | | | Jail receipts of Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 110. | | | | ██████████ Police Report dated 11-28-04 | +| | 111. | | | | Compulsory Medial Examination of victim, CMA | +| | 112. | | | | Victim's school records and transcripts | + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800X)OOCMBAG P HIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, age 8 of 13 + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARK | ADMIT TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 113. | | | | Victim Notification letter dated 7-9-08 | +| | 114. | | | | Victim's employment records from IHOP | +| | 115. | | | | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 116. | | | | Victim's Medical Records from Milton Girls Juvenile Facility | +| | 117. | | | | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | +| | 118. | | | | Victim's Medical Records from Wellington Regional Hospital | +| | 119. | | | | Victim's Medical Records from St. Mary's Medical Center | +| | 120 | | | | Victim's Medical Records from United Health | +| | 121. | | | | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home | +| | 122 | | | | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 123. | | | | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists | +| | 124. | | | | All items taken in the execution of the search warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home: 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | +| | 125. | | | | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | +| | 126. | | | | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | +| | 127 | | | | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey | +| | 128 | | | | Photographs of all persons listed on Victims' Witness Lists | +| | 129. | | | | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto | +| | 130. | | | | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause | +| | 131. | | | | Curriculum vitaes of any and all listed experts | + +| DEF. PLF. | DATE | | +|-----------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | OFFERED MARK ADMIT TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +| 132. | | Curriculum vitae of Dr. Ryan | +| 133. | | Any articles or publications of Dr. Ryan all | +| 134. | | Any articles or publications of Dr and all | +| | | Any articles or publications 'son | +| 136. | | All items and documen ion view by Dr. L. Dennison | +| 137. | | Transcript and VD) of1ME of Victims | +| 138. | | All exhi r L. Dennison Deposition | +| 139. | | Al its Dr. Richard Deposition | +| 140. | | II s and documents reviewed by Dr. Richard | +| 141. | | 11 items and documents reviewed by Dr. Ryan | +| 142. | ICZIIIIIV | All exhibits listed on the Epstein's Exhibit List | +| | c- | reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List | +| 147. | | By listing an Exhibit, is not waiving his right to amend same. | +| 148 | | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to objections. | +| 149. | | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by | + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXIABAG + +## P HIB1T LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, + +age 10 of 13 + +| DEF. NO. | PLF. NO. | DATE OFFERED | MARK | ADMIT TED | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS | +|----------|----------|--------------|------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 150. | | | | All attachments to ██████ Motion for Summary Judgment. | +| | 151. | | | | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | +| | 152. | | | | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | +| | 153. | | | | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Roth ██████ bankruptcy proceeding. | +| | 154. | | | | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | +| | 155. | | | | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | +| | 156. | | | | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI h Alfredo Rodriguez | +| | 157. | | | | Photo depicting ██████, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew | +| | 158. | | | | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | +| | 159. | | | | Epstein emails or correspondence with anyone related in any way to case or related cases | +| | 160. | | | | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | + +Plaintiff reserves th to amend this list. + +ric iS + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +REVISED EXHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Page 11 of 13 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by + +attached list, + +Service to all counsel on the +this \_\_\_\_\_ + +date of \_\_\_\_\_ 11 Nov 2016. + +![]()Jack Scaarol + +jsx (pear aw.com; mep@searcylaw.com + +Florida ar No.: 169440 + +S arc Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +est Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFICATION + +Case No.: 502009CA040800X300CMBAG + +REVISED EXHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, + +Page 12 of 13 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +igoldberizerO,agwva.com;smahonevOagwva.com + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +J. . Esquire + +n Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lelmnan, 4 \ 4 + +ce.com + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954) 524-2820 + +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +William Chester IM, Esquire + +wcblawla,aol.com; w law + +250 S Australian Avenue, Sui + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561) 655-4777 + +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Attorneys for Je ps + +Marc S. Nuri + +m + +Law Office rc S. Nurik + +One E Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Laude I; FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +A Cos + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +REVISED EXHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Page 13 of 13 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +[tonja@tonjahaddad.com](mailto:tonja@tonjahaddad.com); [Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com](mailto:Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com) + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a17ef6b1ee7cbbb0b1907f2382c4f5030237b847 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035/EFTA02760035.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,609 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760035.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 35585, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "REVISED c \nEXHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLA4s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 304.63531494140625 + ], + [ + 489.6, + 304.63531494140625 + ], + [ + 489.6, + 376.8309326171875 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 376.8309326171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 315.26947021484375, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 315.26947021484375, + 97.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 97.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XHIBIT LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 326.6529235839844, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 326.6529235839844, + 109.353515625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 109.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XHIBIT LIST OF COIJNTERPLAINTIFF,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 325.9029235839844, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 325.9029235839844, + 108.603515625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 108.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "P\nHIB1T LIST OF COUNTERPLAINTIFF,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 92.88360595703125 + ], + [ + 312.57647705078125, + 92.88360595703125 + ], + [ + 312.57647705078125, + 122.71649169921875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 122.71649169921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 361.1640625, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 361.1640625, + 144.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 144.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760035" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc5fd1842eeca9f120ebcd03f1e29d9c67bbbae0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.md @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF ER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR TEMPO AY OF PROCEEDINGS + +Cos + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff and through undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Response in Oppositi to i tiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Pr oce grounds therefor states as follows: + +Jeffrey Epstein initiat proof to establish that B tigation in 2009. For three years, he carried the burden of wards had fabricated his clients' sexual assault claims against Epstein, in furthdi of a Ponzi scheme. Substantial discovery was taken by both parties. In 2012,E vole tarily dismissed his complaint, and the sole remaining claim became Mr. Edw s counterclaim for malicious prosecution. For the next five years, the parties litigated mr. claims in both the trial and appellate courts and continued to take substantial discovery on the issues raised. + +### ammary e + +Now, facing a special set trial date in early December, Epstein makes an eleventh-hour request for an indefinite "stay" of these proceedings. Given that trial is less than two (2) months + +On July 7, 2008, Doe v. United Slates, case 80736-ICAM, a Crime Victims' i. Rights Act case, was filed on behalf of Jane D 4 , sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor child. Four days IaEet, l'51an 1Doe filed her Reply to the Government's response to the Doe petition, confi lief that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement at the Federal Court should "direct the Government to proceed to negotiate a new agre lent — in a process that respects Petitioner's (and the other victims') rights."' ("NPA") should be declared ill + +I On er 2009, after being aware for seventeen (17) months that the purpose of the Doe case invalidate his Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein nonetheless voluntarily initiated du civil proceeding, alleging that Mr. had fabricated certain civil claims arising from Epstein's systematic sexual abuse of minor female children as part of a fraudulent Ponzi + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG M' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay + +away, and that the vast majority of discovery and motion practice has already been conducted over the last eight (8) years, a stay is not what Epstein is seeking. What Epstein really wants is a continuance of the upcoming jury trial on the merits. For the reasons stated below, wever, no such continuance is warranted, and the Court should deny Epstein's incorrectly- ill-fated motion. Procedural History 0 + +## A. In 2009. Epstein Voluntarily Initiated this Lawsu Dile Full Knowledge of the prior-filed Doe v. United States Victim's Righ + +See Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay at 2-3 (citing to the July I I, 2008 Reply). Mr. respectfully requests that the Court take judicial notice of the Doe docket pursuant to Ha. Stat. § 90.202(6). + +scheme that Mr. was allegedly running with Scott Rothstein and one of clients, L.M. In his initial complaint, Epstein emphatically stated that "[t]his lawsuit is filed and will be vigorously pursued against all these defendants." See Epstein's Initial Complaint at ummary'. (Emphasis added). In accordance with this representation to the Court, ade no attempt to stay his newly-filed civil case pending the resolution of th aim's Rights Act proceeding. + +On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed his Amended Compl ' nst Mr. , in which he expressly addressed the ongoing Doe proceeding. S cifjca , Epstein alleged in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint: + +... Instead, the purpose of requesting separately filed Crime Victims' Ri Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-C1 purposes, including invalidat s was to obtain them for use in a ( CVRA") suit, Jane Doe I and Jane hnson which was brought for several n-Prosecution] Agreement . . . + +(Emphasis added). Despite no acknowledging to the Court that his NM could be invalidated, Epstein sti made attempt to stay the civil case pending a resolution of Doe. + +On Septem 2, 2 1, Epstein moved to intervene on a limited basis in Doe, thereby inserting him ' to t Victim's Rights Act proceeding. See Doe v. United States, case no. 08 cv-80736- kt. No. 93). One month later, on October 4, 2011, Mr. filed his Amended unterclaim in this civil action, asserting a claim for malicious prosecution and alleging that Epstein had no basis to initiate this suit in the first place. The allegations against Epstein were true, and the horrific nature of Epstein's conduct against Mr. M' clients + +obviated any need for Mr. to exaggerate his clients' claims. Once again, however, Epstein made no attempt to stay this case pending resolution of Doe. + +On August 16, 2012, on the eve of a scheduled summary judgment hearing o the validity of Epstein's underlying claims, Epstein dismissed his remaining claims agai wards without having made any attempt to defend against the motion for su nt. Although the only remaining claim was Mr. MEI counterclaim for mar ious secution, Epstein again made no attempt to stay Mr. counterclai ding resolution of the Doe matter. + +On December 18, 2012, the Court ente 9c 6 er on Counter-Plaintiff IM Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim P \*ti Damages, in which the Court permitted Mr. to amend his counterclai k nitive damages against Epstein. By this Order, Epstein's personal financial info now directly at issue in this case. Yet Epstein still did not seek a stay pending n of the Doe matter. + +For the next five rs, the parties engaged in vigorous litigation at both the trial and appellate levels coi ning Mr. claim for malicious prosecution. Substantial discovery was taken. e time, the Doe proceeding continued before the Federal Court, as Epstein's victim u o protect their statutory rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. The Doe docket reveals that Epstein continued to be involved in that proceeding, and was even a limited participant in at least one settlement conference between the parties in 2016. See a, Dkt. No. 391 (permitting Epstein's counsel to be "present for the joint opening session, after + +which his counsel may remain in the courthouse on standby and subject to limited participation if deemed appropriate by the Court during the course of settlement negotiations."). Consistent with every action he had taken since voluntarily initiating this civil proceeding way back in 2009, Epstein nonetheless never once sought to stay this case pending resolution o rc Doe matter. + +# B. In 2017. Eight Years Later and on the Eve of Trial, EpsteCI tilt Seeks a Continuance Based Upon Doe. + +On July 20, 2017, this Court entered an Order Specially Se Trial, in which this case was specially set, number one, for a ten-day jury trial b on December 5, 2017. Since that Order, Epstein has actively availed himself of scovery while at the same time making a concerted effort through motion prac M • delay Mr. long-awaited day in ja isr Court. This motion practice culminated in of Proceedings, in which Epstein proceeding pending a resolutio o k'gain, however, what Epstein really wants is for the Court to indefinitely continue t specia t December trial date. Epstein claims that, despite voluntarily initiating this case i 009 engaging in protracted litigation and discovery for the last eight (8) years, he carui;:: en is case at trial and will instead "be forced to invoke his Fifth Amendment privileges» ult of the prior-filed 2008 Doe proceeding.2 the underlying Motion for Temporary Stay is that the Court should indefinitely stay this + +2 Epstein's motion begs the question of whether he ever intended to pursue the underling claims, or whether they were simply an attempt to intimidate Mr. his clients and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate sexual abuse claims for less than their just and reasonable values. + +The Court should deny Epstein's request. As demonstrated from the above-described timeline, Epstein is barred from seeking any stay/continuance under the doctrines of waiver and equitable estoppel. Moreover, even if the Court were to consider Epstein's untimely quest for a stay/continuance, Epstein cannot carry his burden to justify such relief on the ev Epstein initiated this litigation eight years ago. He charged that the claims being p r. clients were false. After eight long years, the time has finally come fo a j etermine whether Epstein had any basis for these allegations, and Epstein cannot e pnor-filed Doe proceeding to avoid that determination. + +# Memorandu + +# a. Epstein Waived Any Argument for a uance. + +"Waiver is the intentional or vo re quishment of a known right or conduct which warrants an inference of the relin f a known right." Aberdeen Golf & Country Club v. Bliss Const., Inc., 932 So. 2d (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The elements of waiver are: (1) the existence at the time of th r of a right privilege, advantage or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or g ctive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v av Ins. Agency. Inc. 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). + +!early waived any argument that the Doe v. United States proceeding justifies a stay or continuance of this case. Epstein has been aware since 2008 that the Doe proceeding was pending and that one of the potential outcomes was the invalidation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. Despite these facts, Epstein voluntarily filed suit against Mr. on December + +7, 2009 and then engaged in the following additional affirmative acts to intentionally relinquish any right he may have had to seek a stay or continuance of this proceeding: + +- (1) Actively litigating his claims for the next year and a half which ime Epstein had the burden of proof to establish that Mr. had in act fabricated his clients' claims against Epstein; +- (2) Filing his Amended Complaint on April 12, 2011, in which E icitly stated to the Court that one of the potential outcomes of the s a = ding was the "invalidation of the [Non-Prosecution] Agreeme +- (3) Failing to move to stay Mr. previous! -fi ed Counterclaim, Second Amended Counterclaim or Third erclaim, all of which included a claim for malicious prosecution; +- (4) Failing to request a stay of these proceiC moving to intervene in the Doe matter on September 2, 2011; +- (5) Failing to request a stay of th S eimgs after voluntarily dismissing his remaining claims against MkL on August 16, 2012; +- (6) Failing to request a an entitl Epstein's financials e proceedings after the Court granted Mr. plead for punitive damages, thereby putting on December 18, 2012; and +- (7) Actively defe gainst Mr. sole-remaining claim for malicious prosecu • n for next five years, at both the trial and appellate levels, thereby causirt parties to incur substantial litigation-related expenses. + +is difficult to envision a more clear-cut case of waiver, if for no other reason than it ein who initiated this lawsuit in the first place, after the Doe proceeding had been pending for well over a year and after he was aware that the purpose of Doe was to invalidate the NPA. If Epstein was concerned about the interplay between these two proceedings, particularly as it relates to his Fifth Amendment protections, he should have immediately moved for a stay after + +he filed suit. Epstein failed to do so, and instead chose to actively participate in this litigation for nearly a decade. Epstein's active participation in litigation that he initiated waives any argument for a stay or continuance. C f v Shield 41 So. 3d 931, 033 (Fla. 4th DCA 20 0) (stating that, in the context of arbitration, a party's "active participation in litigation" se ive the right to arbitration). + +# b. Epstein is Estopped from Seeking a Stav/Continuance. + +c) Epstein's attempt to stay/continue this case is also V by e doctrine of equitable rudence for centuries. Florida party into a disadvantageous legal pos DCA 2009). The elements of equ is contrary to a later-asserted position detrimental to thereon. Id. estoppel, which has been a fundamental principle of Am i " B Dept. of Health & Rehab. Services v. S.A.P. 835 So 1 (ic is "based on principals of fair play and essen ' Ssj y • ., that] arises when one party lulls another no v. Workman 20 So. 3d 993, 997 (Fla. 4th pel are: (1) a representation as to a material fact that (2) reliance on that representation, and (3) a change in claiming estoppel, caused by the representation and reliance 096 (Fla. 2002). Equitable estoppel + +Simi fiver, it is difficult to imagine a more clear-cut example of equitable estoppel than Eain's eleventh-hour attempt to indefinitely stay litigation that he started, based on a situation that he created. Epstein filed suit, representing to this Court and Mr. that Epstein intended to prove that Mr. had fabricated the sexual abuse allegations against him, and stating in no uncertain terms that "[t]his lawsuit is filed and will be vigorously pursued + +against all these defendants." See Epstein's Initial Complaint at `Summary'. (Emphasis added). Epstein filed his Complaint with full knowledge of the pending Doe v. United States proceeding and the possibility that his Non-Prosecution Agreement could be invalidated. + +Mr. was forced to defend against these allegations for three (3 reliance on Epstein's representations. After Epstein voluntarily dismissed his cl dwards then spent the next five (5) years pursing his malicious prosecution clai uired Epstein to put forth at least some evidence that the allegations asserted in der ymg complaint were true: Mr. clients had in fact pursued false sexual ab I against Epstein. Mr. has therefore expended substantial time and reso t s litigation in reliance on Epstein's representation that Epstein had probable ca his claims in the first place. + +Now, on the eve of trial, Epstein 4 ...., hand tactics and asserted a new position: he cannot defend the malicious prosecution.el4uts at States proceeding, which was i b Dore Epstein initiated this litigation. If that is true, how did Epstein intend to prove s against Mr. in the first place? Certainly, if Epstein could not defen e upcoming trial because of the 2008 Doe v. United inst a malicious prosecution claim, then he should never have filed the underlyin begin with. Simply put, Epstein's eleventh-hour attempt to avoid a trial due to circumstances that he created is unavailing and should be rejected based on the principles of equitable estoppel. + +# C. Epstein Cannot Establish That a Stav/Continuance is Warranted. + +Even if this Court were to consider the merits of Epstein's eleventh-hour request, Epstein cannot establish that a stay of the proceedings or continuance of the upcoming trial i warranted. As conceded by Epstein, there is no constitutional right to a stay of civil proceedi s, pstein's Motion at p. 7, and this Court had the discretion to manage its trial docket + +wants is for the Court to Irrespective of the title of his motion, what Epstei indefinitely continue the special-set, ten-day jury trial Florida law demonstrates that he is entitled to no en evaluating whether a moving party is entitled to a continuance, the Court sider the following factors: (I) Whether denial of the continuance creates an in e movant; (2) whether the cause of the request for continuance was unforeseeabl r e ovant and not the result of dilatory practices, and (3) whether the opposing party suffer any prejudice or inconvenience as a result of a continuance. Flemin v. 710 So. 2d 601, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). begin on December 3, 2017. + +# i. A Continuance is Not Warranted. + +At the ris belaboring the point, factor (2) alone prevents Epstein from having the upcoming nued. Not only was the "cause of the request for the continuance" foreseeable, but Eps n created the situation he now complains of by initiating this civil proceeding with full knowledge that the Doe v. United States Victims' Rights Act case had been pending for (at that point) well over a year. Epstein even cited to Doe in his 2011 Amended Complaint, in which he confirmed to this Court that the purpose of Doe was to invalidate the NPA. Moreover, Epstein + +certainly engaged in "dilatory practices" by never once requesting a continuance prior to this eleventh-hour request, and instead engaging in protracted litigation at both the trial and appellate levels for nearly eight (8) years. Quite simply, Epstein cannot stay this case based op a situation he created eight years ago, after never once raising the issue until this cause w trial. + +Given that Epstein created the situation he now complains of, he any injustice if the Court denies his request for a continuance. Epstein had eight interplay between these proceedings, and for eight years Epst Amendment concerns did not justify a stay of his civil p nsider the alleged arently decided that any Fifth any event, once Epstein filed suit seeking affirmative relief against Mr. Ed 'was barred from using the Fifth Amendment as both a shield and sword in ts e p ings. See a v. Levv, 696 So. 2d 526, 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Epste' refo cannot hide behind the Fifth Amendment to continue this case. While he is wi is to claim the Fifth Amendment privilege before the jury, Mr. is equally itl to argue that an adverse inference may be drawn against Epstein for invoking the o silence. See, e.g.. Atlas v. Atlas, 708 So. 2d 296, 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). inherently by Mr. e prejudice to be suffered by the opposing party, it is clear that delay is geous to the party carrying the burden of proof, and here the delays suffered have already been extraordinary. Further delay related to the CVRA proceedings could add many additional years of prejudice to the detriment suffered by Mr. M. The CVRA case itself has no predictable end in sight, and if the victims' claims succeed, Epstein faces the potential of years of prosecution of dozens of Federal crimes, followed by years more of + +Justice further delayed is unquestionably justice denied. + +# • ii. A Stay is Not Warranted. + +Florida courts have long-recognized that "[ajlth certain circumstances, a trial court may grant a stay in a civil proceeding for a ii Ntvduring the pendency of a concurrent criminal proceeding, such a stay is not cons( io I required." Urquiza v. Kendall Healthcare Group, Ltd., 994 So. 2d 476, 478 (Fla. A 2D08) (emphasis added). For example in Klein v. Royale Group, Ltd. the Third 11). of Appeal held that a stay became unreasonable fourteen months after the laws filed. 524 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See also Eller Media Co. v. Serrano, 76q dd 464, 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (citing Klein). + +Consiste h the Third DCA's decision in Klein, Epstein's motion admits that stays are typically li a "early stages" of a related civil proceeding. See Epstein's Motion at p. 14 (citin der, No. 10-CV-04535-LHK, 2010 WL 53880000, at \*5 (ND. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010)). Specifically, Epstein states as follows: + +Federal appeals before his criminal jeopardy is resolved. Indeed, the issue of whether his exposure to criminal prosecution will ever end is entirely speculative. + +In the meantime, the poisonous effects of Epstein's malicious lies about a remain z \_ I judicially unremedied. a is entitled to his day in Court to publicly provelhaffht,currilous claims made by Epstein were nothing but a baseless attempt at extortion. O + +"'[E]xpeditious resolution of cases is, as a general mater, preferable to delay of the Court's docket. S.E.C. v. Alexander No. 10-CV-04535-LHK, 2010 WL 53880000, at \*5 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010). However, a number of courts have concluded that + +> staying a related civil proceeding in its early stages `may prove more efficient in the long run' in part because the `stay will allow civil discovery to proceed unobstructed by concerns regarding self-incrimination. + +(Emphasis Epstein's). Here, however, Epstein is not seeking to stay this civil p ing in its "early stages." Rather, Epstein is seeking a stay on the eve of trial after volun ting and actively engaging in this litigation for nearly eight (8) years. Such a reque nable under the Alexander case cited by Epstein and, as recognized by Urouiza, is of to tutionally required under the Fifth Amendment. 994 So. 2d at 478. + +Moreover, "[a] civil litigant's fifth amendment o oid self-incrimination may be used as a shield but not a sword." Rollins Burdick to ew York, Inc. v. Euroclassics Ltd., Inc., 502 So. 2d 959, 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) u ere the party claiming a Fifth Amendment privilege is also seeking affirmative rel 4 at y does not enjoy a carte blanche to invoke the privilege and block its opponent' t e defenses." 696 So. 2d at 527 (holding that order indefinitely conti trial was premature). Here, Epstein filed suit against Mr. alleging dwards had fabricated certain civil claims arising from Epstein's systematic sexua se of minor female children as part of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme that Mr. r y running with Scott Rothstein and one of Mr. M' clients, L.M. Epstein dismissed his complaint, and the only remaining claim is Mr. claim for malicious prosecution, which is a mirror image of those brought by Epstein in the first place. Epstein cannot seek affirmative relief against Mr. and assume the burden of proof on his claims for years, and then turn around on the eve of trial on Mr. counterclaim and suggest + +to this Court that he cannot even defend the validity of the lawsuit that he initiated. \_CI v. Levy, 696 So. 2d 526, 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). This was Epstein's lawsuit, and the time has come for him to defend its propriety before a jury. + +# Conclusion + +On December 7, 2009, Epstein initiated this civil litiga the face of the ongoing Doe v. United States Victims' Rights Act proceeding. In doin n represented to the Court that "[t]his lawsuit is filed and will be vigorously pu i st all these defendants." (Emphasis added). After eight (8) long years, the parties c /Sy y ly set for trial beginning on December 3, 2017, and the time has come for Epste boldly promised to "vigorously Plaintiff respectfully submits t determination to take pla ile llo a jury to determine whether the lawsuit that he d any merit in the first place. Defendant/Countere Court should deny Epstein's motion and allow this + +O + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 10th day of October, 2017. + +![]()[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED] Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcbcg@aol.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esq. +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com; +fred@fredhaddadlaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee917e5a42d746aed419c64adb3345a7aba018c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048/EFTA02760048.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,848 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760048.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 24456, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.46, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF \nER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR TEMPO AY OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 321.703 + ], + [ + 523.7534790039062, + 321.703 + ], + [ + 523.7534790039062, + 350.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 350.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ammary e", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.42999267578125, + 445.75300000000004 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 445.75300000000004 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 460.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 237.42999267578125, + 460.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 281.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. In 2009. Epstein Voluntarily Initiated this Lawsu Dile Full Knowledge of the \nprior-filed Doe v. United States Victim's Righ", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 542.2838134765625, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 542.2838134765625, + 324.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 324.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. In 2017. Eight Years Later and on the Eve of Trial, EpsteCI tilt Seeks a \nContinuance Based Upon Doe.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 542.1460571289062, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 542.1460571289062, + 270.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 270.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Memorandu", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 365.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 365.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Epstein Waived Any Argument for a uance.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 379.30474853515625, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 379.30474853515625, + 393.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 393.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Epstein is Estopped from Seeking a Stav/Continuance.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 373.296630859375, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 373.296630859375, + 283.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 283.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein Cannot Establish That a Stav/Continuance is Warranted.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 440.42034912109375, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 440.42034912109375, + 147.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 147.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i. A Continuance is Not Warranted.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 344.54766845703125, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 344.54766845703125, + 285.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 285.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 ii. A Stay is Not Warranted.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.6999969482422, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 310.10302734375 + ], + [ + 131.6999969482422, + 310.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 338.52978515625, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 338.52978515625, + 283.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 283.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760048" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74045db219e0dde522eb69335f4432231637d8c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CASE NO.502009CA0408003CCOCMBAG + +J, Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +EFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIE TO DEFENDANT INTERROGATORIES + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his and counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Proced certifies that the original answers to Defendant's Expert Witness bite as served upon Defendant and all parties hereto, via electronic service, thi koc tobe 0, 2017. + +\tf, + +\*6 + +S + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@tonjahaddad.com Efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +## SERVICE LIST + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 4OAlk West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +jack Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 iS ) West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +CO N + +49 + +Marc Nurik, Esq. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 1 East Broward Blvd. + +J. Esq. S l athtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Ed s Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Av uite 2 Fort Lauderdale, da 33301 + +Fred Ha Dee@ a dadLaw.com 315 t, Suite 301 Fort u erdale, FL 33301 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9efd32551bbbb04368d143d28b8d129f60b8c0b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064/EFTA02760064.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760064.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1687, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.1312561035156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.1312561035156, + 114.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 114.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760064" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fff886f8a8def700f68e2a1288cd3c49f0486a75 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN in ividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE ' DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said motion is DENIED. However, Jeffrey Epstein shall be permitted to re-depose \_a as to the matters identified on the record by the Court and may raise such objections as he considers are appropriate to the specific questions that are asked. The deposition shall take place within the next 30 days. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this /, , day of SCAF-- . , 'et) nc\_ /ol + +FELE GE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Discovery Objections and Compel Responses + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +Co S + +c + +William Chester = Esquire wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com 4 1 /)1 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (561)-655-4777 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +c4) S1 Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smah eye wpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P. . 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401: Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Phone: (561)-7SK 0 J. + +J. Esquire staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike [REDACTED] Discovery +Objections and Compel Responses + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18872410a930926292011fdff4b834c5deb29221 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066/EFTA02760066.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760066.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3160, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE \n' DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.09000396728516, + 315.914 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 315.914 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 344.859 + ], + [ + 73.09000396728516, + 344.859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 347.3382873535156, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 347.3382873535156, + 182.9730224609375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 182.9730224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760066" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d25121c9d6cb39c3ee5f390fb8a19a18c9e2c3a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +## REBUTTAL WITNESS LIST OF + +J. by and through his unde witnesses for trial as follows: meys, hereby lists his rebuttal + +- 1. Guiffre +- 2. All rebuttal witne y Jeffrey Epstein + +I HEREBY CERTIFY to all Counsel on the attached li d correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +O + +(PI 017. + +JA F Bar No.: 169440 ey E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and ep®searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcbcg@aol.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esq. +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com; +fred@fredhaddadlaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb8633ee38dda97449b801fbc0a755162ea18604 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069/EFTA02760069.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760069.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2512, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "REBUTTAL WITNESS LIST OF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 296.066 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 296.066 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 312.2325134277344 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 312.2325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760069" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0c9754cd78ce58c92025f579475ec6116a6c54a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### NOTICE OF HE (Uniform MotioraII x + +#### TO: ALL PARTIES ON ATTACHED SER §fisNI., T + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t e u rsigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: ctober 19, 2017 + +TIME: Ct)15 a.m. + +PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 North Dixie Highway - Courtroom 10C West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +BEFORE: The Honorable Donald W. Hafele + +MATTE HEARD: The Setting of a Specially-Set Hearing (30 minutes) + +Counsel certifies that a bona fide effort to agree to narrow the issues on the Motion(s) noticed has been made with opposing counsel. + +KINDLY GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, shall, within a reasonable time prior to any proceeding contact the Administrative Office of the Court, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 300, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, telephone (561) 355-4380; 1400-955-8771 (TDD); or 1-800-955- 8770 (V), via Florida Relay Service. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished to all Parties on the attached Service List by Electronic Service and by E-Mail, this 12th day, o October, 2017. + +> W. CHESTER Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, 400 West Palm Beach, F 01 (561) 655-4777 - (561) 835-869 E-Mail: w .com + +t@gmail.com oec /s/ W. Chester r. W. CHESTER JR. Florida Bar No. 261858 + +### Electronic Service List: + +# Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mep@searcylaw.com + +# Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +J. ,Ess , Jaffe, Weissing, , et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +#### Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc®nuriklaw.com + +# Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P. 250 S. Australian Avenue, S7li 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 3401 E-Mails: jgoldberge gwpa om smahon a.com + +# Fred Hadda + +Haddad , PLLC 1 Financial , Suite 2612 Fort Lauderda e, FL 33394 E-Mails: dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +# Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling@tonjahaddad.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e1315fef046073b0a00058ee299eb2cb3d91bad --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071/EFTA02760071.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760071.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2798, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 100.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 100.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HE \n(Uniform MotioraII x", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.28001403808594, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 369.863037109375 + ], + [ + 238.28001403808594, + 369.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TO: ALL PARTIES ON ATTACHED SER \u00a7fisNI., T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 382.901 + ], + [ + 355.57232666015625, + 382.901 + ], + [ + 355.57232666015625, + 398.363037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 398.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 139.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 139.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 155.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 155.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 72.363037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 72.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 101.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 101.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 185.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 185.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 469.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 469.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 568.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 568.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 653.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 653.2330169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760071" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecbb9b436db601d07f4b1b0a7d484b9bf7c1b93a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +#### IN TitE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +#### CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXIV1B + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTE1N + +individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT. JEF EPSTEIN'S RE 1 UEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT ER-PLAINTIFF XPERTS + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendtt Y EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil P~oc t e 1.350, requests that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. produce a of the undersigned, for inspection, and/or copying the following within thirty (30) days est. + +- 1. Copies of an all depositions of your expert witnesses taken in any other action that are in your possession (i uding ur attorneys). +- 2. al reports rendered by experts applicable to any and all issues in this case. correspondence between counsel for Defendant/Counter/Plaintiff and all experts in this matter, whether electronic or otherwise. +- 4. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, paper, letter, bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, survey, plat or other document or tangible evidence including electronically stored evidence in tangible form, furnished or made available to your expert in connection with this matter. + +5. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, paper, letter bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, diagram, survey, plat, or other document, or tangible evidence, including electronically stored evidence in tangible form or other similar source of information considered or reviewed by your expert or upon which your expert relied in evaluating, investigating or formulating his or her opinions in connection with this matter. + +6. Any other information reviewed by each expert in connection with this . + +7. All documents or tangible items of any nature pertaining to the fol g: + +- a. The scope of your employment of expert witnesses is case and the compensation for such service. +- b. The general litigation experience of your ex percentage of work performed for plainti r fendants. +- c. opinions or evaluations during e 1 0) years. The identity of legal actions in w I\*c s in this case, including the of your expert witnesses rendered +- d. The identity of other cases ' h)8ch of your expert witnesses in this case have testified by deposition o a al ring the last ten (10) years. +- e. An approximatio ion of the expert's involvement as an expert witness, which may be the number of hours, percentage of hours, or percentage of earned in ed from serving as an expert witness. + +8. Copies of an and al Is, invoices, records, memoranda, checks, check stubs, receipts, 1099's, tax records or othe omr of financial information evidencing payment or compensation paid by s ,ff Defendant/Coun O in and counsel for services provided by your expert witnesses for the last ten (10) years. + +9.A 7Your 's expert witnesses' most current curriculum vitae or resume. + +10. Each and every document created by your experts in connection with this matter. + +11. MI articles, books, papers, manuals, studies or similar documents both formal and informal, written by your experts or to which your experts contributed, + +12. Any opinions which were revised or modified. + +- 13. A fee schedule for each and every expert. +- 14. All expert reports of the same expert(s) in your possession or that of your attorneys for any other case within the last ten (10) years. +- 15. Copies of all orders pertaining to your experts including any based on motions to limit or bar their opinions or work including but not limited to those orders related to Frye or Daubert. + +It is requested that aforesaid productions be made in compliance with Florida Rules of Civil .4....,L Procedure, at the law office of W. CHESTER la, JR., P.A., 250 Sout relit]) Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Inspection will be made b Meryvation and/or copying. + +If Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's response will bethatt cop es are av ailable for inspection s at the office of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's counsel, requested that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant provide the Defendant/Counter-Plaint h t e cost of those copies so that they may be obtained by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's + +1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru' t copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached Electroni ern• st, this day of , 2017. + ++6s + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasst@gmail.com + +By: /s/ W. Chester Jr. W. CHESTER JR. Florida Bar No. 261858 + +### Electronic Service List: + +#### Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mcp@searcylaw.com + +## Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Jaffe, Weissin:,s , et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staff.efile®pathtojustice.com + +# Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc@nuriklaw.com + +## Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P . 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 14 West Palm Beach, FL 3340 E-Mails: jgoldberger smahone a.com + +## Fred Hadda + +Haddad & v LC 1 Financial aza, uite 2612 Fort Lauderda , FL 33394 E-Mails: dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +# Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling®tonjahaddad.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f989ff60c490aa169c3db30ab7a34590d39756a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074/EFTA02760074.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760074.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5831, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN TitE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 48.7421875 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 48.7421875 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 93.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 93.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXIV1B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 106.683 + ], + [ + 478.93060302734375, + 106.683 + ], + [ + 478.93060302734375, + 136.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 136.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT. JEF EPSTEIN'S \nRE 1 UEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT ER-PLAINTIFF \nXPERTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 305.16299999999995 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 305.16299999999995 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 348.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 348.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 180.0298614501953, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 180.0298614501953, + 64.863037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 64.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 93.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 93.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 178.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 178.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 377.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 377.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 461.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 461.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 560.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 560.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 629.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 629.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 646.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 646.1030120849609 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760074" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2540bc5ac266c55ee70255e33c0c78fa9968e64 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. JUDGE HAFELE + +#### NOTICE OF SERVICING EXPERT INTERROG Ac + +Jeffrey Epstein, hereby gives notice th Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered this day of to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil 6 have been directed to J. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY tha Counsel on the attached El d correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all ervice list, this day of , 2017. + ++6s + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com weblawasst&mail.com + +By: /s/ W. Chester W. CHESTER Florida Bar No. 261858 Jr. JR. + +#### Electronic Service List: + +## Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mep@searcylaw.com + +#### Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +J. ,Ess , Jaffe, Weissing, , et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +#### Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc®nuriklaw.com + +#### Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P. 250 S. Australian Avenue, S7li 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 3401 E-Mails: jgoldberge gwpa om smahon a.com + +## Fred Hadda + +Haddad , PLLC 1 Financial , Suite 2612 Fort Lauderda e, FL 33394 E-Mails: dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +# Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling@tonjahaddad.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f89fd3780f239a3492a47091d216a524676a9187 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078/EFTA02760078.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760078.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1999, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 57.06300000000001 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 100.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 100.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICING EXPERT INTERROG \nAc", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 339.897 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 339.897 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 356.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 356.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 72.363037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 72.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 101.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 101.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 185.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 185.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 469.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 469.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 568.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 568.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 653.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 653.2330169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760078" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760080/EFTA02760080.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760080/EFTA02760080.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54a375a5a0ce04fd335da305ed9d88e58fc44046 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760080/EFTA02760080.md @@ -0,0 +1,640 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1.11.ThENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 0408003CCaMBAG + +v. + +J. et al., + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +### JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO NI ION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE. THE TUNE 30. 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF IEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICIT DISCOVERY WAS WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE + +tAio + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epst Vin"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Res to fendant/Counter-Plaintiff a') Motion in Li to e the June 30, 2017 affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein,' which was filed in sup undisputed facts as recited in his Motion for Summary Judgment, and to d evidence as to which discovery was withheld under claims of privilege." As de ted more fully below, Motion is deficient on its li face, and in direct con ttiction to the facts. As such. Motion should be denied. + +?S' + +### INTRODUCTION + +lied his Motion for Summary Judgment on June 30, 2017, and in support the executed an affidavit, which was nearly identical to the one he executed in support of his previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment in 2012. In this affidavit, Epstein delineates the undisputed facts upon which he relied in filing suit against . A true + +I While the Court denied as moot the striking of the affidavit as to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment for purposes of the Summary Judgment hearing, the issues raised in the Motion are still addressed herein. + +and correct copy of same is attached hereto as "Exhibit A." now seeks to strike this affidavit, and asserts as grounds therefor Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination in response to discovery posed to Epstein. However, as demonstrated below, Motion is meritless should be denied, as the facts alleged on Epstein's Affidavit are entirely consistent with his testimony, under oath, at his deposition, as well as with evidence provided in this case, contrary to assertions. + +Additionally, Motion seeks an Order in limine precludi ified and unidentified evidence. As such, his Motion should also be denied f identify that evidence he seeks to preclude. Accordingly, Motion enied. + +## MEMORANDUM OF + +#### L EPSTEIN'S STATEMENTS IN HIS CONSISTENT WITH EPSTEIN'S PREVI ALLEGATIONS RELEVANT TO THIS C 2017 AFFIDAVIT ARE ONY REGARDING THE + +Epstein's deposition was taken weds on March 17, 2010. In that deposition, Epstein did assert the following p certain questions posed by attorneyclient and Fifth Amendment. er, Epstein answered all of the questions actually germane to this lawsuit. cursory review of Epstein's deposition unequivocally shows that he only as his ifth Amendment Privilege when asked questions of a criminal nature; ques ch have no bearing on his abuse of process claim against A true copy of Epstein's March 17, 2010 Deposition is attached hereto as "Exhibit B." Contrary to allegations in his Motion, the following questions were posed to, and answered by, Epstein: + +Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: L.M. is part of a conspiracy with Scott Rothstein, creating — excuse me — creating fraudulent cases of a sexually charged nature in which the U.S. At ne i has already charged the for of Rothstein, a firm of which is a partner, was a partner, with creating, fabricating malicious cases of a sexual nature, including cases with respect to me, specifically, in order to fleece unsuspecting investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars. + +See Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 13; lines 9-21. + +Q. Your Complaint in this action alleges that L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her alleged damages. What does that mean? + +A. It means what it says. + +Q. I don't understand it. Explain it to me. + +MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question withou llfLipg my conversations with you or Mr. Critton's conversations with yo ft e1ff as my work product, you can answer the question. + +THE WITNESS: I believe that as part of the scheme to efra d investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars, claims of eo sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across th And the only way - in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what 44I' the paper, claims that I've settled cases for \$200-million, which • not true. She has made claims of serious sum of money, which ipAu ge + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. How much have you settled cl ' + +MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct ot answer that question. + +MR. SCAROLA: And the b f th nstruction is? + +MR. PIKE: Confidential agreements, to the extent that they exist. And the terms would ori6d al. + +hi at p. 19; line 7- p. 20; li + +s do anything that he shouldn't have done that forms the ur la suit against him? + +rm. + +S: Yes, many things. + +. SCAROLA: + +ist them for me, please. + +. He has -- he has gone to the media out of, I believe, in an attempt to gin up these allegations. He has contacted the media. He has used the media for his own purposes. He has brought discovery -- he has engaged in discovery proceedings that bear no relationship to any case filed against me by any of his clients. + +His firm, which he's the partner of, has been accused of forging a Federal Judge's signature. + +Id. at p. 23; lines 3-19. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these allegations and engaged in what you contend to be irrelevant discovery proceedings, what else did Mr. [REDACTED], personally, do that forms the basis for this lawsuit? + +A. Mr. [REDACTED], personally, engaged with his partners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail cell, potentially for the rest of his life, he shared information, what I've been told and -- excuse me -- what I've read in the newspapers, 13 boxes of + +information that had my name on it, with other attorneys at his firm. + +He counseled his clients to maintain a position alleging multi-million dollar damages in order for them to scam local investors out of millions of dollars. + +He and his -- many of his other partners already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney have been accused by the U.S. Attorney of running a criminal enterprise. + +*Id. at p. 25; lines 5-25.* + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Okay. What media did Mr. [REDACTED] go to? + +A. I am aware of at least the Daily News in New York City. + +I have been told by other people that there were other media, local media. + +I've been told that the -- his investigator was sent to California to harass people representing his -- Brad [REDACTED] investigator -- representing fictitiously, fraudulently that he was a FBI agent to try to gather information for Mr. [REDACTED] claims. + +*Id. at p. 26; lines 5-15.* + +13 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +14 Q. What does an investigator going to California + +15 have to do with Mr. [REDACTED] allegedly going to the media + +16 in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these +17 allegations? + +18 MR. PIKE: Please answer the question. + +19 THE WITNESS: Good. It's part of Mr. [REDACTED] + +20 scheme to involve people who have nothing to do + +21 with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back + +22 to the media and gin up his stories and make false + +23 allegations of people that have a sexually charged + +24 nature cases in order to attempt to fleece + +25 investors, local investors out of millions of + +1 dollars. 2 His firm has been accused by the U.S. Attorney 3 of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators, 4 by illegal wire taps, by illegal methods of 5 eavesdropping in order to go to the media and 6 generate cases. + +Id. at p. 28; line13- p. 29; line 6. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. You said you were told by other people that he went to other media representatives? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are the other people that told you that? + +Page 30 + +A. I don't recall at the moment. + +Q. What did these other people who you don't re 11 you Mr. + +did with respect to other + +media representatives besides the Daily Ne + +A. Again, the question again? + +Q. What did these other people tell + +Mr. did with respect to g r media? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Mr. EdwarsIrwent the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm d5ogtcl generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medias and making statements to local press regarding false clai adooy his clients in order that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail soul defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investo Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +BY MR. SCA • + +Q. Whe did other le whose identity you can't remember tell you these that rad did? + +A. in the past year. + +Q Ho many other peir, vere ? there who told you + +At ngs about Mr. A. I would say, probably five to ten. + +don't recall with specificity. + +. Well, do you recall in any degree how many there were? + +Id. at p. 29; line 22- p. 31; line 4. + +A Co's + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly communicate to the Daily News to, quote, gin up these allegations, unquote? + +A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. -- not quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred to as Mr. statements. + +MR. SCAROLA: Would you read the question back, please, Sandy? (Pending question was read.) + +MR. PIKE: Did he answer your question? MR. SCAROLA: No. + +MR. PIKE: Are you asking him again? + +THE WITNESS: So you're asking the question again? + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Yes. + +THE WITNESS: Sorry. Could you repeat the question again? + +(Pending question was read.) + +THE WITNESS: He alleged that third parties had already been inv some allegations to do with sexual misconduct. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Which third parties? + +A. I don't recall sitting here today. + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: If I recall with specificity, if I had in front of me, I would be able to recall. Maybe next time. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. What does "gin up these allegations" m + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: It means craft alle ulti-million dollar cases; in fact, alleging in L.M.'s case damag Ilion, settlements in order for Scott Rothstein and the rest of Ed ' partners to fleece unsuspecting investors out of millions and. of dollars based on cases that didn't exist or alleged cases that I + +Id. at p. 32; line 6-p. 33; line 2 + +Q. Was your refe quote, gin up these allegations, unquote, a reference to allegation mad g nst you? + +MR. P orm. + +TilE As part of the vast conspiracy of the Rothstein firm and Mr. Edw cipation in it, it has been alleged that many cases were brought — alleged that have been brought; ginned up, meaning, multi-million dollar numbers put on cases in order to fleece investors, wh a his partner, Scott Rothstein, currently sits in jail for just those purposes, Mr. Scarola. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. My question to you is: Did the reference to, quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations against you? + +A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper reports. + +idgfically what are the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up? + +A. I would like to answer that question. A, many of the files and documents that we've requested from Mr. and the Rothstein firm are still unavailable. + +With respect to anything that I can point to today, Pm, unfortunately, going to have to take the Fifth Amendment on that, Sixth and 14th + +Id. at p. 34; lines 3-25. + +Q. Waffle discovery proceedings did + +Mr. engage in which you contend for the basis for your lawsuit? + +A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. variousk417tt + +Q. Which various people? Who? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: For example, he tried to depose Bill means of getting publici 1 y so that he and his fi craft money from unsuspecting investors in Sou dollars. , strictly as a udulently steal, out of millions of + +Id. at p. 36; lines 10-23. + +Q. Okay.§22EL of the basis of yo \$ + +that Mr. allowed mem see 13 boxes of information; f hi own law firm to ect? + +A. No, that's not correct. shown to investors by the press contain fabricated in order t with investors, Mr. partners curre is that the boxes of information that were ' partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by , fraudulently • and if you like the wordinvestors out of money. The 13 boxes were shared ards, Mr. partners and some of those er indictment, the others already sitting in jail. + +Id. at p. 38;1 11-22. + +Q h newspaper said which case was + +ob Norman's blog said most of the cases were fabricated, to my best ollection. + +The Scherer Complthntabd many fabricated cases, sir. + +Q. Well, which of Mr. cases do you contend were fabricated? + +A. Again, we've requested most of the • • information from the bankruptcy trustee. We've been unable— Mr. has not given us the total file, but respect to any individual, I would have. • at the moment I would have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment claim, sir. + +Id. at p. 39; lines 7-20. + +Q. My question is: By whom was Mr. employed at the time that he initiated litigation against you? Do you know the answer to that question? + +A. I'd have no way of knowing the answer to that question, sir. + +Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against Mr. which you contend form the basis of this lawsuit is something having to do with sending an investigator to California. + +Would you tell me, please, more specifically what it is that Mr. did with regard to sending an invel, to California which you con` justifies a legal claim against Mr. + +MR. PIKE: Form. And also mischaracterizes the witness' testimony. + +THE WITNESS: Reported widely in the newspapers is the use o•Ileil activities, wire taps, and me y the Rothstein firm while Mr. had basically been bringin + +The investigator, Mr. Fisten, who's mentioned in the Complaint, represented himself as an FBI agent, falsely represented himself as an FBI agent. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was in + +MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can an that question without disclosing my co or my firm's conversation or any of yo s' conversations with you, you can question. + +THE WITNESS: I'm sorry attorney/client privilege + +Id. at p. 48; line 1- p. 49; line II. + +BY MR. S 0 + +Q. Do yo a any personal knowledge that was involved in any o civil litigation abuses? + +nn. Confusing. + +S: It's widely reported in the newspaper that Mr. firm discovery processes, illegal activities, illegal eavesdropping in der to fleece unsuspecting investors in South Florida out of millions in dollars by crafting, fabricating malicious cases of a sexually charged nature in order to perpetrate a fraud. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +itioou have any personal knowledge that ever forged Federal Court Orders and/or + +Opinions? + +A. It's attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that involved in the marketing of non-existing Epstein settlements? was ever + +MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. I would like to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege I cannot today. + +Id. at 52; line 1- p. 53; line 4. + +Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics. Other than those matters previously referred to in earl•bstions, is it your contention that had any personal involvement in any other, quote, abusive investigatory tactics? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the newspapers that Mr. firm was engaged iAf, widely -- wildly abusive practices throughout State of Florida in order to fleece unsuspec • g investors out of millions of dollars. + +The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleg engaged in a corrupt criminal ente + +Mr. Scherer's Complaint alleges tro amounts of fraud and discov + +I have no personal knowl to from the attorney/client pri rmation, regarding Mr. Edw + +Id. at 53; lines 6-24. + +O + +Q. Who the ardworking and honest lawyers on whose behalf you are bringi Co plaint? + +M . Form. Mischaracterizes the Complaint itself. + +T the tent you understand that question, attempt to answer, if you recall. + ++ e U.S. Attorney, sir, has accused the Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system, a level of abuse never seen before in the United States history, of forging documents, an affront to any decent lawyer, signing Judge's Orders, sending false statements to other lawyers. The people who have been - excuse me -- the Complaint by the U.S. Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the + +WITNESS: Yes. + +Jaw firm as well as Mr. -- my Complaint says, + +Mr. \_ i l being a part of that. Id. at 57; lines 9-25. + +Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking and honest lawyers" are that are referred to in that section of your Complaint. + +A. My attorneys, at least, are honest. + +IS at 59; lines 11-14. + +Q. Did you read the Complaint before it was filed? + +A. It was a while ago, yes, sir. + +Q. And did you approve the Complaint prior to its filing? + +A. Yes, sir. + +M. at 62; lines 7-12. + +Q. Is that what you meant to say? + +A. What I meant to say, it is -- seems to me somew Rothstein firm, along with Mr. , is part largest -- excuse me -- the largest criminal history, forging Judges' signatures, enga behaviors. And part of this lawsuit shou should set right. ear — is that the al enterprise, the in South Florida's gal wire taps, illegal which means, I believe + +And if it's not clear, the Rothstein legal justice system. It abused e values of the American justi omised the core values of our y of the precepts, the most basic + +And, in fact, I believe this will disclose the vario technique, abuse of di by both Mr. of the reason for filing this lawsuit, it es of attorney/client privilege, abuse of very) illegal wire taps, forging signatures engaged in • firm. + +Q. So it is your co n that Mr. was part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Yes, it is. + +M. at 63; lines + +Q ever personally witnessed Edward -- engaged raud? + +A.N,iow would one — I'm not sure how anyone would personal — have personal knowledge, witness someone engaging in wire fraud, unless they were simply sitting over their computer looking at their bank accounts. So, unfortunately, I would have to say, no, sir. + +. Have you ever personally witnessed engaged in money laundering? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Again, sir, the U.S. Attorneys Complaint of the Rothstein firm alleges money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, RICO claims of Mr. a partners and his firm, calling the firm the largest criminal enterprise in South Florida's history, accused of fabricating malicious cases, sir, of a sexually charged nature in order to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of millions of dollars. + +Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that + +Mr. ever personally participated in any of that wrongdoing? + +MR. PIKE: To that question, to the extent you + +Page 67 + +can answer it without violating attorney/client and work product, you can answer the question. + +THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Do you have any evidence -- knowledge of any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever particip in any effort to market any kind of investment in anything? + +A. I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +Id. at 66; line 1-page 67; line II. + +Id. a es 3-25. + +Q. Your Complaint alleges to market investments. ?oths S \ in and others in RRA were using RRA + +Who are the others re the Complaint? + +A. From my unders the U.S. Attorney's + +Complaint, from held themselv rer's Complaint, it is the partners and people who partners of the Roth -- Scott Rothstein, including + +Mr. Berger, M r, Mr. and other peg •le + +associa with prono n her name, c ual4er investigation by either the Florida S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. e firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane , if that's how you Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm + +A + +Cos + +Q. Do you have any evidence that Brad sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: The newspapers have widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settlements of cases of a sexual nature including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the documents from Mr. and his firm and we have not been able to get them as of yet. + +I am confident that once we do, I will be able to answer your questions with more specificity. + +Id. at 83; lines 11-22. + +Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola? + +A. This is the type of questions where people who have nothing Svith to this case whatsoever have been brought into the case by Mr. in an attempt to simply imperil my relationships with social friends and serves as an and his sir. example of why this case has been brought against Mr. + +Id. at 90; lines 9-15. + +AS" + +Q. Okay. So because those names are in your Complaint, I'm i io about the people you named. + +Have you had a social relationship with Tommy Mottol + +A. The names in my Complaint are strictly as a reaction to the abusive discovery process by Mr. , his partners, Scott Rothstein, w r jail, in an attempt to imperil my friendships. + +But, yes, I have socialized with Mr. Mott a. + +Id. at 91; lines 11-19. + +. Ar (St Q. Have you had a social rela nship.with David Copperfield? + +A. As a reaction to, once again, the abusive discovery process of brirain names of people that ha C bsobtely I nothing to do with any of Mr. , Mr. Rothstein's or their lient ' claims, by bringing in the names of friends of mine strictly in an atte o stress my relationships, imperil my business relationships, I'm o say, yes, I do know Mr. Coppe Id. + +Q. Have ver sdcialized with David Copperfield? + +A. A • + +MR. .rm. + +SS: lnt + +ical othstein strategy of trying to involve well-known e in maliciously fabricated cases in order to fleece investors out of millions of dollars. They brought up names in attempts at abuse of discovery process to try and + +Page 93 + +take discovery of people who have nothing to do with this case. + +Did I socialize with David Copperfield? The answer is, yes. + +Id. at page 92; line I1-page 93; line 4. + +Q. Have ou ever had a social relationship with Bill Governor of New Mexico and formerly U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United Nations? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: As is typical of the scheme, along with his partner, Scott Rothstein, who sits in jail, what they attempted to do was bring in any celebrity I might have known, well-known people, in an a to strictly + +imperil my relationships with these people where these peo ye lfo bearing whatsoever on any of their claims or cases. O + +Yes, I do have a social relationship. + +Id. at page 93; line I8-page 94; line 6. The questioning next to damages Epstein suffered as a result of RRA and actions in thi + +Q. What are the damages that you claim to a suffered asmi rnce of any wrong + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: The cost of ridi litigation, of having my alto responses to wildly irrelev)fi j5ewRry in various locations at a minimu + +BY MR. SCARO + +Q. Which lawyers? + +A. Burman Critton, oldberger, and a bunch of the others, + +Id. at at 116; yftgs 8-19. + +Q a t as much information as you can give me 1 s element of damage which you claim; and, that -4 • e cost of legal services that you claim to be ages in this case. + +A. Okay. + +MR. PIKE: Form. And move to strike. + +THE WITNESS: Mr. Roy Black. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Okay. Who else? + +A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. + +Mr. Jay Leficowitz. The firm of Burman Critton Luther. + +That's it for the moment. + +Id. at 120; lines 12-24. + +Q. Do you hold Mr. • described? ?sibl S'f' r all of the damages that you have + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: It's di described between Mr. other people named in th me to proportion the damages that I have his partner, who is currently in jail, his -- the mplaint. Hopefully a jury will do that. + +Id. at 125; lines 6-1 + +Acco ' , ntrary to assertion in his Motion, Epstein consistently answered ons that are germane to the claims made in this litigation and his reasons for filing same; including what he believed at the time he filed suit and the damages he suffered as a result of the actions of the Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs at that time. As such, Epstein can, and should, be able to present evidence, including the June 30, 2017 affidavit, to support his defense. + +Q. How much have you paid the law rum of Burman Critton and Luttier which you claim is damages? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. + +Q. How much? + +A. I don't have that figure offhand. + +Q. Can you give us any better figure than hundreds of thousands of dollars? + +A. No, not sitting here today. + +Id. at at 117. + +Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart lawyers? from the money ,4' .to 0 + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. What? + +A. The stress and emotional damage of imperiling business relationships with no relevance whatsoever to a firm that whose partner sits in a Federal prison, wh harass my friends and social contacts with no this case whatsoever, in an attempt to simply in South Florida out of millions of dollars, s my hips and , brought by in discovery to n or relevance to artly fleece investors + +Conversely, has still, to this very day, steadfastly refused to answer relevant questions regarding the actions he took in the Epstein cases while was a partner at RRA or his damages; instead he has hidden behind a plethora of privileges, including such novel ones as "government privilege," notwithstanding that it is he who is prosecuting this matter, who is specifically asserting the propriety of his actions in his litigation of the cases while at RRA, and who bears the burden of proof. As such, not only sh wards's Motion to preclude evidence be denied, but should als eluded from presenting any evidence or testimony for which he has asserted ar4 herein. + +#### II. EPSTEIN HAS CONSISTENTLY PRO DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT AND HIS GOOD FAITH AT THE TIME HE BR CLAIM AGAINST TIMONIAL AND NSE OF THIS ACTION S ABUSE OF PROCESS + +What seems to be lost on always been Epstein's reasonable sus n improper conduct by in his litigation of the three Epstein c the time period while was a Partner at RRA. Epstein does not all brought the Epstein cases against him in bad faith, and although that is would like to litigate, the sole issue here is what did in n cases while he was a Partner at RRA; while these cases were used to fi m rs out of millions of dollars in furtherance of a Ponzi Scheme. Indeed, Epstei of testify as to what happened behind the scenes at RRA; by definition that wou ve to come from third parties, and documentary evidence. While them was certainly extrinsic evidence in Epstein's possession prior to filing suit to create a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing by during that relevant period, see Statement of Undisputed Facts and Affidavit in Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, has, continually, consistently, and systematically blocked all attempts to obtain relevant evidence i t \* the crux of Epstein's claims has dI + +regarding his activities in the Epstein cases while he was a Partner at RRA. See Depositions of and Discovery Responses of all of which are subjects of Motions to Compel pending before this Court. + +Moreover, in the few responses provided to Epstein's Request for Admissions, admitted to filing the Federal L.M. Complaint while was a partner at RRA and only months before the Ponzi scheme imploded; the one tha hown to investors in order to persuade them to invest tens of millions of doll the Ponzi Scheme was in desperate need of funds to prevent it from unravel at he neither served it on Epstein nor prosecuted it. also adntatted fflnrhe included false blamed it on inadvertence. See Respa allegations in that Federal L.M. Complaint regarding o Epstein, though he later 8ic hereto as "Exhibit C." This is also evidence l iNti Epstein relied not only in the filing of his case against ME, but also in ros tion of same. uests for Admissions. attached + +Finally, there is neither law nor a rule of civil procedure pursuant to which the striking of Epstein's is warranted. does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a o er as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure;iflpt• d assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be s •m a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 of the Florida Rules of Civil Proce ing Motions to Strike. As such, Motion to Strike is improper. See Van Valkenberg v. Chris Craft Indus., Inc., 252 So. 2d 280, 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) ("a motion to strike is not favored and is viewed with skepticism"). Consequently, because Epstein's affidavit of June 30, 2017 is consistent with his Complaint against , his sworn testimony at deposition regarding the facts known to him at the time he filed his + +Complaint and each amendment thereto, which is also supported by all documentary evidence also provided with Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, and is also consistent with responses to the few discovery requests to which he did not object or assert a privilege, Motion should be denied. + +# ILL AN ADVERSE INFERENCE WOULD NOT BE PROPER IN THIS CASE + +A trial court's decision to allow an adverse inference is always di civil proceeding, the drawing of a negative inference is a permissible result of a party's invocation of the Fifth Amendment. While the inferences against civil litigants who refuse to testify on F' Anlplfdment grounds, it does ary. In a n inevitable, ot forbid adverse not mandate such inferences. As such, the trial co u tennine whether a negative inference is an appropriate response to the inv V'' o f e Fifth Amendment in a particular civil case. In re Carp, 340 F.3d IS, 23 k ( "fSi 3); Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976). See also Doe ex rel. Rudy- zer Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1264 (9th Cir. 2000) ("The Baxter holding is not a le that allows adverse inferences to be drawn from invocations of the privile t self-incrimination under all circumstances in the civil context"). Rudy-Glan F.3d at 1264 ("[T]he key to the Baxter holding is that such [an] adverse infe the part y be drawn when independent evidence exists of the fact to which to answer. Thus, an adverse inference can be drawn when silence is y independent evidence of the fact being questioned, but that same inference cannot be drawn when, for example, silence is the answer to an allegation contained in a complaint); Centennial Life Ins. Co., v. Nappi, 956 F.Supp. 222, 228 (N.D.N.Y. 1997) ("An adverse inference against the party invoking the Fifth Amendment by itself is insufficient to establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact."). + +In other words, a party cannot be found liable solely upon the basis of reliance on Fifth Amendment; there must be other evidence. Baxter, 425 U.S. at 318; Lefkowitz, 431 U.S. at 808, n. 5;Lasalle Banks Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F.3d 387 (7th Cir. 1995); National Acceptance Co.of America v. Bathalter, 705 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1963) (assertion of Fifth Amendment in an answer to a complaint does not constitute an admission of the allegations and does not relieve the plaintiff of the need to adduce proof). Accordingly, this must analyze the questions to which Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment Pri ' ore it can determine whether or not an adverse inference may be permitted. H indicated in his Motion which questions and invocation respo eeking to have this Court apply the inference, nor established the pertnissi e inference as explained above. As such, a "blanket" entitlement to an adve nee is impermissible. ds has neither + +V i an Furthermore, if the party invoking ' 844V , mendment privilege has honest explanation that would defeat civil liab• • (wh simultaneously incriminating him), he is S e faced with a Hobson's choice; i can suffer the risk of an adverse inference or, alternatively, he can provide s m t mony that may be used against him at a later criminal proceeding. A review o 'osition questions and answers in this matter would establish that such is the sued Epstein for Abuse of Process and Malicious Prosecution. n prevailed on the Abuse of Process claim, and all that remains is c livi \in for Malicious Prosecution. When asked in deposition why he filed suit and upon what facts he based this decision, Epstein answered questioning; he did not invoke his rights as to the issues germane to this litigation; to wit: why he filed suit and what his damages were. See Exhibit B. When inquiry turned to questions regarding Epstein's criminal case and the facts surrounding the allegations made by the plaintiffs in the + +civil suits had already settled with Epstein, which are irrefutably not an issue in this civil case (or even necessary to an element of causes of action), Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege. As such, permitting an adverse inference to be drawn regarding testimony (or lack thereof) that is not part of the litigation is impermissible. + +Moreover, Epstein's last version of the Complaint against was devoid of any allegations about conduct of any of clients, and was narrowly amelltl to cite, as a basis for the abuse of process claim, only litigation activity during wards was a partner at RRA. Consequently, testimony from Epstein about the sity of three clients' claims, any criminal investigation, or the cl ' of other third parties has no bearing whatsoever on challenged • ti isconduct. In other words, testimony as to matters to which Epstein woul vi 04ad , the Fifth Amendment are not, and would not be, relevant to Epstein' process claims against and preclusion of evidence or an adverse • ren ould be improper. + +tly on point, Florida courts have held that trial courts may draw an adve in fence against a party in a civil action who invokes his privilege against self- 'nation. The Fourth District Court of Appeal held that in a civil action, the F ent does not forbid adverse inferences against parties "when they refuse to in response to probative evidence offered against them...." Fraser v. Sec. & 615 So. 2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (quoting Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 96 S. Ct. 1551, 47 L. Ed. 2d 810 (1976)(emphasis added)). Accordingly, the evidence to which the party is refusing to testify must be probative, relevant, and material to the case. Here, because the underlying-or potential- criminal investigation against Epstein is neither relevant nor material to the current litigation, evidence relating to same would not be While there is no Ho + +probative to the case. + +Moreover, in the instant case, it is evident from witness and exhibit list, as well as his own continued assertion of privileges, that he would like to be prosecuting a criminal case against Epstein, or litigating a case he already settled with Epstein on behalf of one of his three clients or even other plaintiffs that he did not represent while he was a partner at RRA and litigating against Epstein; but such is not the case. Rather, must prove each element of a Malicious Prosecution case; including want of ause and damages, which he cannot do, so instead he is attempting to circu a Ovidence upon which Epstein relied in filing suit, and the fact that he was h s law partner, and prejudice and inflame the jury with allegations of c conduct by Epstein and Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment privile se to the harassing questioning to which he was subjected. See Exhibit B. s ) por i + +The case of Nationwide Insuran L aieo. ichards, 541 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2008) is instructive. In Nationwide, the t rt precluded Angelina, a claimant under the insurance policy who was ac ed o ing involved in her husband, the insured's, murder, from testifying on rele t' oy&atters to which she had previously asserted her Fifth Amendment pn e. Th trial court prohibited her from testifying "only as to . . . her involvement ereof) in Bryan's murder. The court's order was narrowly tailored to impos gelina only that detriment necessary to prevent unfair prejudice to Keith (the adverse party)." Id. at 911. The Court stated: "Because the privilege is constitutionally based, the competing interests of the party asserting the privilege, and the party against whom the privilege is invoked must be carefully balanced, and the detriment to the party asserting it should be no more than is necessary to prevent unfair and unnecessary prejudice + +to the other side." Id. at 910 (citing Doe ex rel. Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d1258, 1265 (9th Cir. 2000) (addressing propriety of adverse inference as a consequence of asserting Fifth Amendment privilege during pretrial deposition).The Nationwide Court went further in its analysis of the applicability of an adverse inference, and stated: + +under certain circumstances . . . an adverse inference from an assertion of one's privilege not to reveal information is too high a price to pay." D ex rel. Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1265 (9th Cir. 2000) ( is added in quote). "The tension between one party's Fifth Amendme the other party's right to a fair proceeding is resolved by each instance where the adverse inference was drawn, or not draw -bycase basis under the microscope of the circumstances of ular civil litigation." Id. (citing Graystone Nash, 25 F.3d at 192). inf nce may not be drawn "unless there is a substantial need for th ' o on and there is not another less burdensome way of obtaining nnation." Id. (citing Serafino v. Hasbro, Inc., 82F.3d 515, 518-19 6). The district court must determine "whether the value ting[the] evidence [is] substantially outweighed by the dang prejudice" to the party asserting the privilege. Id. at 1266 R. Evid. 403; Brink's Inc. v. City of New York. 717 F.2d700, 7 . 1983)). Moreover, the inference may be drawn only when the tnd ndent evidence of the fact about which the party refuses to tes Id. 264. + +Id. at 912. Accordingly, bef urt may conclude that is entitled to an adverse inference, or any tse o>j Epstein's prior testimony in which he invoked his Fifth Amendment privileg r' st first make findings as delineated by the case law above, as here, Epstein e de nant d in the civil suit being prosecuted by as well as the target of s litigation against the federal government in the United States District e Southern District of Florida, Doe v. United States, No. 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Ha.) (the CVRA case) in which seeks to subject Epstein to criminal prosecution. + +Finally, ambiguous and overly-broad request that Epstein be precluded "from offering evidence or testimony as to any matter about which he has declined on the basis of the assertion of privilege to provide pre-trial discovery" completely disregards the fact that Epstein has timely and properly provided with his trial exhibit and witness list. If there is a specific document/item/witness with which takes issue, should properly identify same, either through a proper motion or at trial, so that this Court can properly examine the issue and rule on request that it be precluded. See Tomlinson-McKenzie v. Prince, 718 So. 2d 394, 396 (FI DCA 1998); Aguila-= v. City Management Group Corp., 606 So.2d (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). + +In the case at hand, has engaged in a s discovery into his own conduct, including the entire tim K i) ~vfiich Epstein's underlying abuse of process claim was pending, and at the s i Sts, t e reclaimed the propriety of his actions based only on evidence unrelated (to S eir st , civil claims of his own clients. To avoid any recognition of this fact, he no attempted to shift the focus of his sole remaining count against Epstein am'nation of allegations of Epstein's alleged criminal conduct, as well as s against Epstein in civil claims against Epstein by persons other than Edwa clients. At best, the issues that insists on making central to his cas ancillary, and even if adverse inferences were granted on those issues, those adve, infe nces would not be dispositive of whether Epstein had probable cause for on to avoid any filing against . Without an absence of probable cause, there is no claim for Malicious Prosecution, regardless of any malice that hopes to have the jury infer from circumstantial evidence relating to allegations of criminal and civil misconduct by Epstein. + +Accordingly, because Epstein's amended Abuse of Process claim was not a denial of the underlying claims of clients, but rather was based on pursuing a litigation strategy that had nothing to do with his clients' claims but that sought instead to perpetuate the largest Ponzi scheme in south Florida history, should not be permitted to try and prejudice the jury with irrelevant material in order to deflect from his ,O4' own behavior. + +0 N is that this Court d his ambiguous and In reliance upon the facts and case law cited above, Eps deny Motion to Strike Epstein's June 30, 2017 improper Motion in Limine, or alternatively Order evidence for which he seeks preclusion. identify with specificity the + +## CONCLUSION + +I hereby certify that a true and corS listed on the attached service list, vi %IN' service, this October 13, 2017. this Response was served on all parties + +> /s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 Tonja Haddad, PA 5315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com Efiling@TonjaHaddad.com + +### SERVICE LIST + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Goldberger, jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA ,1OAlk" Esq. 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Marc Nurik, Esq. Suite 700 East Broward Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +A + +J. MO, Esq. < c4 .4C) Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Charles H. Lichtman Berger Singerman 350 East Las Olas Blvd., 10th F or Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By: Rodney J s Fla. Bar o. 647896 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760104/EFTA02760104.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760104/EFTA02760104.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85e961fde1c0f2b7bcbfcca80118b826ea2a2a8e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760104/EFTA02760104.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760104.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2096, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.55, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.9669999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.6579999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.6579999999999, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 291.9669999999999, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.337, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 366.62799999999993, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 366.62799999999993, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 237.337, + 311.85 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760104" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd7c689167bf8cb00899996c17085fdeaca0cc5f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.md @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## SUPPLEMENT TO RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAY\_OF PROCEEDINGS + +'\*. by and through unc'signed counsel, hereby files this Supplement to his Response in Opposition to PlaiaCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings, as =follows:" + +While Jeffrey Epstein eitpressly seeks a temporary stay of these proceedings pending the outcome of the Doe case, hi, motion makes clear that disposition of the Doe case will not resolve the civil litigation issues he created by suing for allegedly fabricating false molestation charges against him. It is certainly true that if the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) is invalidated, Epstein faces Federal prosecution for a wide range of crimes as to which the NPA purports to grant him immunity. However, it is equally true that even if the CVRA challenge to Epstein's immunity deal fails, Epstein is still in jeopardy of Federal criminal prosecution. As Epstein points out in the footnote at Page 6 of his motion: + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings Page 2 of 5 + +"The Government has argued in Doe v United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM, Dkt. 205-2 at 9-13, that, by its express terms, the NPA binds only the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, is venue and subject matter specific, and does not, accordingly, preclude prosecution in any other district nor prosecution for offenses that were not within the I statutes specifically enumerated in the NPA, or the subject of the joint investigation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attomey's -- Office in the Southern District of Florida. NPA at 2-3." zr + +Accordingly, there is nothing temporary about the relief effrey Epstein seeks. The geographic and temporal scope of the criminal conduct in whi pstein has engaged and the dozens (if not hundreds) of children he is believed to a t mized expose him to criminal prosecution completely independent of his abili the sweetheart deal he cut with Federal prosecutors in the Southern District o + +As Jeffrey Epstein is compelle 'It n , "there is no constitutional right to a stay of civil proceedings pending resolutio ted criminal proceeding." Here, there is not only no criminal proceeding pending, there is no predictable end in sight to the related proceeding that is pending, and the pending proceedings will not terminate Epstein's criminal exposure no matter how or wh#ie C RA proceeding is resolved. And Epstein never argues otherwise. He makes no as to when the CVRA action will terminate. He makes no commitment that his Fi ment assertions will be withdrawn when the CVRA action does terminate. + +Epstein urges consideration of six factors in determining whether a stay should be granted: + +1. There is a direct and substantial overlap between the issues raised in these proceedings and Epstein's ongoing criminal exposure. Epstein created that overlap when he framed the issues in his false and malicious action against + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings Page 3 of 5 + +2. Epstein has not been indicted. He may never be indicted. His jeopardy exists independent of any decision as to whether he can or will be indicted. + +3. ' interests in resolving these decade-old claims far outwei Epstein's interests when he needlessly started this fight and waited years to request ite (and potentially limitless) stay. + +4. Epstein waived any interest he might have to a stay b' delaying as long as he has to request it. + +5. The Court has a clear interest in resolving ti r which is rapidly approaching trial after a decade of delay. + +6. The public has a very substan ' in - i \lin concluding this matter which has been ql the focus of intense public attention ancr ivolv s allegations of a substantial perversion of the justice system. + +Nothing about the wei C 'ng ) f these factors supports the granting of the relief Jeffrey Epstein seeks. \>\ 7 + +Defendan should Aden+ er-plaintiff, i J. respectfully submits that the Court Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 17th day of October, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings +Page 5 of 5 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████, Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com + +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc377aebb910dcf46fb095301c6a4bf120b4e591 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106/EFTA02760106.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760106.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6918, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.776 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 72.776 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 115.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 115.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENT TO RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAY_OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.144, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 510.31219482421875, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 510.31219482421875, + 364.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 364.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760106" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e9502f3a3e8ca5a31a1ff091ce3cf197be7585a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.md @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X.MMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +A + +REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE T MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE THE JUNE 30 2017 AF OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS EGE + +J. by and t hi undersigned counsel, hereby files his Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to B Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and klude Evidence As to Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege and s ards' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 + +In respon~radley motion, Jeffrey Epstein contends that he "answered all of the quest' I germane 4 this lawsuit" [emphasis included by Epstein]. Response Pg. 2. "When ed in deposition why he filed suit and upon which facts he based this decision, Epstein answered questioning; he did not invoke his rights as to the issues germane to this litigation; to wit: why he filed suit..." [emphasis included by Epstein]. Response Pg. 18. "Here, because the underlying—or potential—criminal investigation against Epstein is neither relevant + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to MIN Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege Page 2 of 6 + +nor material to the current litigation, evidence relating to same would not be probative to the case." Response Pg. 19. + +That is the foundation of Epstein's argument quoted directly from his Re Anse. These assertions are ABSOLUTELY FALSE, and we need not look beyond Epstein' pon e for clear record illustrations of this falsity. This is Epstein's testimony quoted cs) d' his Response: + +Q: Why are you suing L.M.? + +A: L.M. is part of a conspiracy with.. .creating fraudulent cases of a sexually charged nature...creating, fabricating fl Ling mall&I CSfa sexual nature, including cases with respect to me, specifically in order to ot ing investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars. pstein deposition, Pg. 13, lines 9-21 + +Q: Did Brad at he shouldn't have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against him? + +A: He has—he has to the media out of, I believe in an attempt to gin up these allegations. Id. at Pg. 19, line 7, Pg. 20, line 5 + +Q: these other people tell you Mr. did with respect to going to other media?,÷ + +A: Mr. went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medics [sic] and making statements to local press regarding false claims made by his clients in order that Scott + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMI. + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege Page 3 of 6 + +Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, could defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +Id. at Pg. 28, line 13, Pg. 29, l'n 6 + +Q: What does "gin up" these allegations mean? + +A: It means craft allegations...based on cases that didn't e 1 ged cases that I had settled. Id. at Pg. 31 + +So, what is obviously "germane to this lawsuit" b basis for his claims against claims against Epstein as part of Ed ein's own explanation of the is whet ards fabricated sexually charged \ o ng participation in a massive Ponzi scheme. Let us turn again to the testimon 'quotes in his own Response to determine the accuracy of Epstein's central conte ' answered "all of the questions actually germane to this lawsuit." + +Q: Specificall , whams the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up? + +u 'ke to answer that question. A, many of the files and documents that we've requested Ai . and the Rothstein firm are still unavailable. With respect to anything that I A: point to today, I'm, unfortunately, going to have to take the Fifth Amendment on that, Sixth and 14th. Id. at Pg. 33 + +Q: Well, which of Mr. M' cases do you contend were fabricated? + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMI. + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Ele Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege Page 4 of 6 + +A: Again, we've requested most of the..information from the bankruptcy trustee. We've been unable..Mr. has not given us the total file, but respect to any individual, I would have..at the moment I would have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amen clam, sir. + +Id. at Pg. 38 + +Q: Do you have any personal knowledge that Court Orders and/or Opinions? 14C; .forged - Federal + +A: It's attorney/client privilege. + +Q: the marketing of non-existing Epstein settlemen . was ever involved in <40 Do you have any personal knowledge fiic + +Mr. Pike: Same instruction. S, + +The Witness: I'm sorry. I to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege, I cannot today. Id. at Pg. 48 + +Q: And I'm t ing to1iR8 out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that Mr. nally participated in any of that wrongdoing? The a' : afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +By . la: + +Q: Do you have any evidence—knowledge of any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever participated in any effort to market any kind of investment in anything? + +A: I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +Id. at Pg. 67 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege +Page 5 of 6 + +While numerous other examples of Epstein's highly relevant assertions of privilege have already been brought to the attention of the Court, we need not go outside the testimony cited in Epstein's own Response to see the absurdity of his assertion that his privilege assertions pertained to matters unrelated to the malicious prosecution claim pending against him. Indeed, it appears that Epstein's counsel failed to read the testimony they cited. [REDACTED] Edwards' motion should be granted on the strength of Epstein's own responses. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of October, 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to ██████████ Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege +Page 6 of 6 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████ Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b14a2a1a23ced1e63d6dd90f2bf1381fda046c09 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111/EFTA02760111.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760111.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 8873, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 541.275390625, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 541.275390625, + 116.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 116.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 154.71 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760111" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43502da639a15f0ee58bd52c19361c39e76dda9d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR +DEPOSITION OF ██████ TAKEN OCTOBER 12, 2017** + +Counter-Plaintiff, ██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits his Page and Line Designations for the Deposition of ██████ taken on October 12, 2017 as follows: + +- 1) 4:12-5:20 +- 2) 125:2-126:21 +- 3) 128:21-148:14 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20Th day of October, 2017. + +![]()██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of ██████████ taken 10.12.17 + +Page 2 of 2 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████ Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e8c826d1c1feab85e9d9477299d750b5eb76b04 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117/EFTA02760117.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760117.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2610, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 TAKEN OCTOBER 12, 2017", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 310.125 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 310.125 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 338.24299999999994 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 338.24299999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760117" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f6c9578b4c1d1497d08bdcc89ee6aa001b56d48 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +VS. + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +J. et al., + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, + +## NOTICE OF M AC + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that M elk' 'on this matter is set as follows: + +DATE: November 20, 2017 TIME: MEDIATOR: Brian Sp 10:00 a.m. LOCATION: Searcy Dllatt Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 21 alm Beach Lakes Boulevard We in Beach, FL 33409 c 61 6-6300 ,÷O + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of October, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Mediation +Page 3 of 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcc1ca69bb1fdcedf1569ecf7cd062b6fe922db5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119/EFTA02760119.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760119.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2750, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 540.9053955078125, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 540.9053955078125, + 117.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 117.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF M AC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 352.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 352.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760119" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1af5220dd6bc13e7620fcc0e09a997aea313fb2e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO D ION + +TO: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipl 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mep®searcylaw.com + +> Nichole J. Segal, Esq. Burlington & Rockenbac Courthouse Commons/ 444 West Railroad Ave West Palm Beach L 334 E-Mail: njs®FLA kb FLAppellateLaw.com latcLaw.com + +Brad ards, Weissing, et al drews Avenue, Suite 2 derdale, FL 33301 '1: staftefile®pathtojustice.com + +GO + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the video deposition of: + +NAME: J. + +DATE & TIME: Friday - November 10, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. + +EPSTEIN VS. Case No.: 50-2009CA040800X3CXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Taking Video Deposition of J. Page 2 + +> PLACE: Searcy, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +upon oral examination pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, befo 1m Beach Court Reporting (court reporter) and Visual Evidence (videographer) or or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida continue from day to day until completed. The deposition is bein discovery, for use as primary evidence at trial, and for suc A the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Florida ode. an 6SNotary Public examination will n for the purpose of ses as arc permitted under + +## CERTIFIC RVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a all Parties on the attached Servi August, 2017 t copy of the foregoing has been furnished to ectronic Service and by E-Mail, this 29th day of + ++6s + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasst@gmail.com + +By: .s/ W. hester W. CHESTER , JR. Florida Bar No. 261858 + +EPSTEIN VS. Case No.: 50-2009CA040800X3CXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Taking Video Deposition of J. Page 3 + +## Electronic Service List: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mep®searcylaw.com + +Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com + +, Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staffefile®pathtojustice.com + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 2 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc@nuriklaw. + +Jack A. Goldberg + +Atterbury, G r Weiss, P.A. 250 S. A an enue, Suite 1400 West P L 33401 E-Mai s: rger®agwpa.com s ahoney®agwpa.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. + +Haddad & Navarro, PLLC 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 E-Mails: dcc@haddadandnavarrolaw.com EPSTEIN VS. Case No.: 50-2009CA040800X3CXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Taking Video Deposition of J. Page 4 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +efiling@tonjahaddad.com Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5309396b929161022df9f66f41d9ba6d4f53ac64 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122/EFTA02760122.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760122.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3403, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 510.4084167480469, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 510.4084167480469, + 114.10302734375 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 114.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO D \nION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 320.87600000000003 + ], + [ + 428.5870361328125, + 320.87600000000003 + ], + [ + 428.5870361328125, + 334.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 334.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFIC \nRVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 388.48876953125, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 388.48876953125, + 397.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 397.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 194.7886505126953, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 194.7886505126953, + 146.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 146.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760122" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..431e0db0ea8c5de8a64e18e9f7d8e9aeeb7dacd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTErN individually, J. • individually, and L M., individually, + +Defendants. + +4sk + +/ 4 + +## NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY O + +COMES NOW the Defendant, J. d through the undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Unavailability as foll ws + +The law offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A. will be closed from December 24, 2017 through and including Janu theo , , and respectfully requests that no hearings, depositions, trials or any other matters invol ' ye-styled cause be scheduled during this time. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached 1 t, thi 4/ + +, 201 + +No.: 169440 E-Mails: jsx®searcylaw.com and ®searcylaw.com mary E-Mail: \_scarolaTeam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0008eab19897ee5b1a2d109cb16736dbcad69c16 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126/EFTA02760126.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760126.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2686, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 274.14501953125 + ], + [ + 434.9849853515625, + 274.14501953125 + ], + [ + 434.9849853515625, + 293.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 293.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 154.71 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760126" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a0bde196144455c7cd14ac6c057375b71de9340 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +to preclude J. M, by and through his undersigned ttorneys, moves for a protective order from, being compelled to respond to those questions proffered on the record with respect to the ending t Crimes Victims' Rights Act case in which ■ **is a named Plaintiff. The bases\*BaW,ey a objections are those stated on the record as reflected in the deposition tm'sCript attached.** + +## MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this f Gdarit-s" 2017.** + +**AROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440** + +**Attorney E-Mail(s): jsxqsearcvlaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J.** + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +██████████' Motion for Protective Order + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████, Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ff76945d53995571185a7510d5d21b561c27bc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128/EFTA02760128.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760128.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2846, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 322.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.9879455566406, + 322.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.9879455566406, + 337.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 337.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760128" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00d06ec0565d499fb9507837a001d0979cafc712 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.md @@ -0,0 +1,6127 @@ +1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT + 2 OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL + 3 CIRCUIT IN AND FOR + 4 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + 5 CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG + 6 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + 7 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + 8 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. + 9 vs. + 10 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + 11 [REDACTED], individually, + 12 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + 13 VIDEO DEPOSITION OF + 14 [REDACTED] + 15 DC# 790503 + 16 Taken on Behalf of PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT + 17 DATE: October 12, 2017 + 18 TIME: 10:12 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. + 19 PLACE: Gadaden Correctional Facility + 20 6044 Greensboro Highway + 21 Quincy, Florida 32351 + 22 Examination of the witness taken before: + 23 JEFFREY R. BABCOCK, PPR + 24 For the Record Reporting, Inc. + 25 1500 Mahan Drive - Suite 140 + 26 Tallahassee, Florida 32308 + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL: + 2 On behalf of the PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT: + 3 W. CHESTER [REDACTED], ESQUIRE + 4 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 + 5 Office: 561-655-4777 + 6 Pax: 561-835-8691 + 7 Email: weblaw@aol.com + 8 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE + 9 Atterbury Goldberger Et Al + 10 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 + 11 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5016 + 12 Office: 561-659-8300 + 13 Cell: 561-659-8300 + 14 Pax: 561-835-8691 + 15 Email: jgoldberger@agwpa.com + 16 On behalf of the DEFENDANT [REDACTED] + 17 JOHN "JACK" SCAROLA, ESQUIRE + 18 Searcy Denney Scarola Et Al + 19 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + 20 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-6601 + 21 Office: 561-686-6300 + 22 Cell: 561-686-6300 + 23 Pax: 561-383-9451 + 24 Email: mep@searcylaw.com + 25 On behalf of DEPONENT: + 26 [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], ESQUIRE + 27 [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing-Edwards Fistos Lehrman + 28 425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2 + 29 Pt Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268 + 30 Office: 954-524-2320 + 31 Cell: 954-524-2820 + 32 Pax: 954-524-2822 + 33 Email: brad@pathtojustice.com + 34 VIDEOGRAPHER: + 35 BEENA SYED + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 INDEX TO WITNESS PAGE + 2 [REDACTED] + 3 Direct Examination by MR. GOLDBERGER 5 + 4 Cross Examination by MR. SCAROLA 124 + 5 Redirect Examination by MR. GOLDBERGER 148 + 6 \* \* \* + 7 EXHIBITS + 8 NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE + 9 1 FBI Memorandum 91 + 10 Certificate of Oath 149 + 11 Certificate of Reporter 150 + 12 Errata Sheet 151 + 13 Read & Sign Letter to Witness 152 + 14 \* \* \* + +1 DEPOSITION + 2 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the record. Today + 3 is Thursday, October, 12, 2017. The time is + 4 approximately 10:12 a.m. We are located at the + 5 Gadaden Correctional Facility 6044 Greensboro Highway, + 6 Quincy, Florida, 32351 for the deposition of [REDACTED] + 7 [REDACTED]. My is Beena Syed as the videographer, the + 8 court reporter is Jeffrey Babcock. Would the counsel + 9 for the parties please introduce themselves beginning + 10 with the Petitioner or Plaintiff, and then the court + 11 reporter will swear in the witness. + 12 MR. SCAROLA: My name is Jack Scarola, I'm + 13 counsel on behalf of [REDACTED]. Mr. [REDACTED] is + 14 also present, both in his capacity as Plaintiff in + 15 this action, and as counsel for the witness. + 16 MR. GOLDBERGER: Jack Goldberger here behalf + 17 of Jeffrey Epstein. + 18 MR. [REDACTED]: Chester [REDACTED] on behalf of + 19 Jeffrey Epstein. + 20 Whereupon, + 21 [REDACTED] + 22 was called as a witness, having been first duly sworn to + 23 speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the + 24 truth, was examined and testified as follows: + 25 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +DIRECT EXAMINATION + +1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +2 Q. Okay. Would you state your name for the record +3 please. + +4 A. [REDACTED] + +5 Q. Okay. Do you go by another name also? + +6 A. Yes. [REDACTED] + +7 Q. Okay. Which name do you prefer to use now, [REDACTED] + +8 or [REDACTED] + +9 A. We can use [REDACTED]. + +10 Q. Okay. Is [REDACTED] a married name for you? + +11 A. Yes. + +12 Q. Okay. And is there a Mr. [REDACTED] + +13 A. Yes. + +14 Q. What's his first name? + +15 A. Brent, B-r-e-n-t. + +16 Q. And are you still married to Mr. [REDACTED] + +17 A. Yes. + +18 Q. Okay. And how long have you been married? + +19 A. About six years. + +20 Q. Okay. And where is Mr. [REDACTED] right know? + +21 A. He's incarcerated. + +22 Q. Okay. And where is he incarcerated? + +23 A. At Suwannee CI. + +24 Q. Okay. That's here in the State of Florida? + +25 FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Yes. + +2 Q. Okay. Do you know what he was convicted of that +3 has him incarcerated? + +4 A. Robbery. + +5 Q. Strong-arm robbery, armed robbery, do you know +6 what it was? + +7 A. Just robbery. + +8 Q. Just a plain robbery? + +9 A. Yes. + +10 Q. Okay. And he was sentenced as a habitual +11 offender? + +12 A. Yes. + +13 Q. Correct? + +14 A. Yes. + +15 Q. Do you know what it means to be a habitual +16 offender? + +17 A. Yeah. + +18 Q. What does it mean to you? + +19 A. He's had a history. He has history, you know? + +20 Q. Do you know what his history is? + +21 A. Well, he was -- the first time he went to prison, +22 he was convicted for robbery as well, I believe. + +23 Q. Okay. Were you married to him when he was +24 convicted of the robbery that has him in the Suwannee +25 Correctional Institution now? + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Yes. + +2 Q. Okay. And do you know what his sentence is? + +3 A. He was sentenced to 13 years. + +4 Q. Okay. Were you living with him when the robbery +5 that had him convicted and sentenced to 13 years took +6 place? + +7 A. Yes. + +8 Q. And where were you living then? + +9 A. In Delray Beach. + +10 Q. And what was the address there? + +11 A. I can't remember the address off hand. + +12 Q. Okay. So [REDACTED] was convicted in Palm Beach +13 County for -- + +14 A. Yes. + +15 Q. -- strong-arm -- for robbery? + +16 A. For robbery. + +17 Q. Okay. And sentenced as a habitual offender? + +18 A. Correct. + +19 Q. Okay. And I'm sorry if I asked you this already, +20 but do you know when that took place? + +21 A. He -- about five years ago. + +22 Q. Okay. So you were not yet in custody on your +23 trafficking case? + +1 together -- + +2 A. Yes. + +3 Q. -- is that correct? + +4 A. Yes. + +5 Q. Okay. And your child was born in prison? + +6 A. No, my child's five years old. + +7 Q. Okay. Have you been married to anyone else other +8 than Mr. [REDACTED]? + +9 A. No. + +10 Q. Any other marriages in your life? + +11 A. No. + +12 Q. Okay. What is the sentence that you are serving +13 now [REDACTED]? + +14 A. A 36-month sentence. + +15 Q. Okay. And what were you convicted of? + +16 A. Trafficking, violation of probation, and petty +17 theft. + +18 Q. Okay. You were convicted of trafficking in +19 amphetamines? + +20 A. Yes. + +21 Q. Okay. And do you know what drug in particular +22 you were convicted of trafficking in? + +23 A. Methamphetamine, amphetamines. + +1 A. Hillsborough. + 2 Q. Okay. + 3 A. Tampa, Florida. + 4 Q. Okay. Okay, and you were convicted of + 5 trafficking in more than 2\$ grams of amphetamine? + 6 A. No, actually it wasn't more than 2\$ grams. + 7 That's what I was booked on, but it was under 2\$ grams + 8 when I plead out. + 9 Q. But you pled to trafficking; correct? + 10 A. Correct. That's correct. + 11 Q. Okay. + 12 A. Yeah. + 13 Q. What does trafficking mean? + 14 A. Selling drugs basically. + 15 Q. Okay. So you were convicted of selling drugs? + 16 A. Well, trafficking; right. + 17 Q. Okay. But "trafficking" meaning selling drugs -- + 18 A. Correct. + 19 Q. -- is that your understanding? + 20 A. Yes. + 21 Q. You entered a guilty plea to something, did you + 22 not? + 23 A. Correct. + 24 Q. And you stood in front of a judge and told the + 25 judge you were guilty -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Yes. + 2 Q. -- did you not? + 3 A. I did. + 4 Q. And you told the judge that you were guilty of + 5 selling drugs; is that correct? + 6 A. I -- yes, if that's how you want to word it, yes. + 7 Q. Well, you tell me how you want to word it. You + 8 can word it any way you want to. + 9 A. That's -- yes, I told him I was guilty of + 10 trafficking, selling methamphetamine. + 11 Q. Okay. And that trafficking is methamphetamine + 12 had a significance because it carried a minimum-mandatory + 13 sentence with it, did it not? + 14 A. Right. + 15 Q. And do you know what I mean when I say + 16 "minimum-mandatory sentence"? + 17 A. Yes. + 18 Q. Okay. What does it mean? + 19 A. That I had to do -- it was three years that I + 20 had -- a minimum-mandatory of three years. + 21 Q. So the judge could think you were the nicest + 22 person in the world and he had to give you three years in + 23 prison? + 24 A. Correct. + 25 Q. Okay. And you negotiated a guilty plea to that + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 trafficking case? + 2 A. Yes. + 3 Q. You had a lawyer representing you -- + 4 A. Yes. + 5 Q. -- did you not? + 6 A. Yes, I did. + 7 Q. Okay. Did you have a court-appointed lawyer, or + 8 did you have a private-paid lawyer? + 9 A. No, I had a private attorney. + 10 Q. Okay. And that private attorney negotiated a + 11 plea for you; correct? + 12 A. Correct. + 13 Q. Okay. And do you know that you could be facing + 14 up to 30 years on that trafficking case? + 15 A. I think it was, like, seven years I could have -- + 16 I could have gotten was seven years, but -- + 17 Q. So -- + 18 A. -- it went down to three. + 19 Q. Okay. Your understanding is that the maximum you + 20 could have been sentenced to on the trafficking case that + 21 you pled guilty to was seven years in prison? + 22 A. Correct. + 23 Q. And your lawyer told you that? + 24 MR. [REDACTED] I object. + 25 // // // + +1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 2 Q. You don't need to answer that question, that's + 3 fine. Okay. You understanding was that you could only be + 4 sentenced to seven years in prison? + 5 A. When I first was booked on the charge and I went + 6 to first appearance, the first judge you see at first + 7 appearance told me it was a minimum mandatory of seven + 8 years. + 9 Q. Okay. + 10 A. So that's what I was told. + 11 Q. Right. So I'm not talking about the minimum + 12 mandatory, I'm talking about what the statutory maximum + 13 was for the offense for which you entered into a plea + 14 negotiation -- + 15 A. With trafficking charges, it's about the weight + 16 of the drug, and because I had 28 grams, it was a + 17 seven-year minimum mandatory. Now, when I sat in county + 18 and I fought it for ten months, when they went back and + 19 tested the drugs, it wasn't 28 grams, it was under 28 + 20 grams. So I took a guilty charge, pleaded guilty to a + 21 trafficking -- selling drugs, of methamphetamines, and + 22 took a 36-month -- + 23 Q. Okay. My question to you is, putting aside the + 24 minimum mandatory -- + 25 A. Un-hmm. + +1 Q. -- do you know what the statutory maximum is? Do + 2 you know what I mean when I say "statutory maximum"? + +3 A. No. + +4 Q. Okay. Now, you say you fought and contested that + 5 charge for 10 months? + +6 A. Correct. + +7 Q. Okay. So you told the judge for ten months that + 8 you were not guilty of the offense; correct? + +9 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, leading. + +10 THE WITNESS: I -- I don't know how to -- + +11 MR. SCAROLA: Objection pleading. + +12 MR. GOLDBERGER: Did you tell the judge that + 13 you were not guilty of the offense for ten months? + +14 THE WITNESS: Correct. + +15 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, leading. + +16 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +17 Q. And after ten months, did you enter a guilty + 18 plea? + +19 A. Yes. + +20 Q. Okay. So after ten months of saying you were not + 21 guilty, you stood in front of a judge -- was it the same + 22 judge, by the way? + +23 A. Yes. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, compound and + 25 leading. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Okay. + +2 A. I'm sure I was. + +3 Q. Okay. You're sure you were? + +4 A. Yes, I was. + +5 Q. Why are you sure you were on probation for felony + 6 theft? + +7 A. Yes, I was -- let me go back. I -- yes, I was on + 8 probation for felony theft. + +9 Q. And the reason why you were on probation for + 10 felony theft is that you had had so many convictions of + 11 petty theft? + +12 A. Correct. + +13 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, leading. + +14 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +15 Q. Was there another charge that you were also + 16 charged with and pled guilty to when you were sentenced to + 17 three years in the State Florida Department of + 18 Corrections? + +19 A. It was the trafficking, violation of probation, + 20 and petty theft. + +21 Q. And the petty theft. + +22 A. Correct. + +23 Q. Okay. Did you plead guilty to that petty theft? + +1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +2 Q. Okay. And did you tell that judge that, in fact, + 3 you were guilty of selling drug? + +4 A. So when I was booked, if you could see the + 5 charges that I was booked on, when I pled guilty, I wasn't + 6 charged with all those charges that I was first booked on. + 7 But yes, I pleaded guilty after the ten months -- + +8 Q. Okay. + +9 A. -- of seeing the same judge, yes, I did. + +10 Q. Well, in addition to pleading guilty to + 11 trafficking in drugs and selling drugs, you also pled + 12 guilty to a violation of probation -- + +13 A. Correct. + +14 Q. -- did you not? + +15 A. Correct, yes. + +16 Q. And in fact, you were on probation for theft, for + 17 stealing, were you not? + +18 A. Correct. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, leading. + +20 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +21 Q. Were you on probation for theft? + +22 A. Yes, I was. + +23 Q. Okay. And were you on probation for felony + 24 theft? + +25 A. I -- there's a possibility, yes. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Was it a crime of dishonesty? + +2 Q. Yeah. + +3 A. I mean -- + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, I'm going to object + 5 to the extent the question calls for a legal + 6 conclusion. + +7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Did you do something + 8 dishonest when you stole and got convicted of petty + 9 theft? + +10 THE WITNESS: Sure. + +11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. What was it -- + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection. + +13 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +14 Q. What was it that you did that was dishonest when + 15 you stole and pled guilty to petty theft? + +16 A. I took something that wasn't mine. + +17 Q. What did you take? + +18 A. I can't remember right know. + +19 Q. Because there were so many of them? + +20 A. No, I just can't remember exactly what I took. + +21 Q. Did you have a bond when you were arrested for + 22 the selling/trafficking in methamphetamines? + +23 A. Yes, I did. I don't remember how much it was. + +1 O. Okay. Did you have the florin to pest bond? 2 A. Ho. 0. Okay. If I tell you the bend was 525,000 4 . did you not have 12500 de aaaaa to post bond) A Correct. O She was your lawyer on these cases, A Julian Mayes. 6 I'm sorry, Julseruor A. Julian Styes. Yes. 10 O. Okay. Is that • man or • female? 11 A. A eon. 12 Okay. And he was • retained lawyer on your part) 1) A. Yee. la O. Okay. Did you hire that lawyer? 15 A. Yes. 16 Dld Mr. assist you in that matter) If A. IS 0. Woo have you boon at this correctional If institution .. I say \*this correctional insti tttttt .° 20 think it's called Gadsden. Is that what it's Ca 21 A. 22 0. Gadsden C rrrrrrr final Institution? 23 A. Veil. 24 O. Have you been bore since your sentence? 25 A. Yeah -- well, they -- when I first was ttttt need. + +I n they took me to RHO. 0. What's that? Talk to at In ' 1 knob' you understand -- A. MOO is wharfs they bring everybody that getf sentenced to prison, and they basically show you how to be Prlsoner for about two months. end then they ship you to tttttt coepOund you're going to go to. So I stayed at RHO. Mich S. a coapeond In Ocala. for two months and then I was .hipped here. 10 O. And you go to Chas saw to learn bow to be a 11 prisoner? 12 A. Yeah. . that's v t t for -. they Shaw 1) you. like. what -- how to live yyth.. gluons 14 basically. 25 0. I see. okay. ✓ ou been hoot over sinus 16 leaving RPO? 17 A. Taa. 15 0. In Ocal If A. Yet. 20 O. And n la your projected release date, 2) 22 t'S October 12th, 2011. 23 . Is that subject to change. or is that kind because of the et names mandator?' + +POP TM RP:0PM IttlaTI\*3 7ALLJJUatt. Fan\* 150.222.54ft PM ENE UMW IttaG•11110 TALIW0LISSIS. FLORIDA OSO.222.5411 + +? S \ + +20 + +I A. Me. that's -- that's going to be sy eleatie Illt k \*it 2 0. Okay. Se ea October 12 of 201a hew eh of he 2 3 thres.year \*Animus...a ttttt y sealants, the sin 3 M. GOLOSERGUis Do you -- 4 tttttt te you could have received. wi have Soma] 4 MR. SCAROLO hum no Object to the form S A. I'll do two-and.a.half years tb • yearn. S of the question. it is leading and It tttttt nces 4 Okay. And the plea aft t your lawyer .. 6 documents not In evidence. f Mayes, is that his name) f BY MR. GOLOStaGro I a O. Okay. Do you remember that. arrest] f Q. Mr. Mayes? for you was the Mains a A. Yee. 10 sentence you eel. Ra ed -- 10 0. Okay. And whet were you charged with having II A. Carr t. II talent 12 O. la er act] 12 A. It was petty theft. I don't reseaber what. I) A. Yea. 13 0. You don't rehiebor what you stole) 14 Q. Okay. And what was your strut date on the 14 A. Ho. IS tratfleking In drugs) IS Do you remember which were you stole (reel 16 A. It was In April of 2014. 16 A. It was Mal-Mort. II 0. Okay. Without telling ea what he may have told 11 O. Mal-Mart? 15 you. did you consult with Mr. at any tine after 10 A. On.han. if your arrest in April of 20163 If O. You have ether convictions free hinnies stolen 20 A. About the case? About the trafficking case? 20 free Mal-Mart. de you not) 21 O. Yes. 21 A. Yeah. Yes. I do. 22 A. We. 22 S. Okay. 1 want to talk to you about your criminal 23 Okay. The theft that had you placed on 23 record for a little while. De you renoeher the first time 24 probation. based en the records Iere . took plats 24 you ware ever convicted of a cries? 25 in MOvewbor Of -- actually itoveeher fth of 201S? 25 + +I SEAROLA. Object to the fors of the + +1 O. De you ~Amber how old you ..... 2 A. NO. I don't. 3 O. Okay. Do you know how navy tines you harm been 4 convicted of a IS MR. \*CAROLS: Both of the grounds that you 16 have inquired about? + +I/ MR. GOLOBIMGERi Are than any other grounds le that you ere using to advise aoneene who is not your 19 client not to answer quest lone? + +20 NR. SCAROLA, well. that really depends on 21 what the additional questions are. 22 MR. GOLDOTRGIM. Nell. we have messy 22 additional questions. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Go ahead and ask than. proffer 25 then for the record .. + +1 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: -- I'll raise my objection -- + +3 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: -- and instruct the witness not +5 to answer -- + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: -- and we'll move on from +8 there. + +9 MR. GOLDBERGER: All right. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: And just so that things are +11 abbreviated, I will simply say "same objection, same +12 instruction." + +13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Well, I'd like, if +14 you have any additional objections other than she +15 doesn't have an opportunity to consult with her +16 attorney or you think it's irrelevant, then please +17 state them. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: And you are improperly seeking +19 to take discovery in a case other than the case that +20 is presently pending before the court. + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay, fair enough. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Before this court. + +23 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +24 At any time did the FBI agents -- did any FBI +25 agents tell you that Mr. Epstein was pleading guilty + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 in state court to avoid federal prosecution? + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +3 instruction. + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Did you ask the FBI +5 at any time to speak to prosecutors prior to +6 Mr. Epstein entering into his guilty plea? + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +8 instruction. + +9 MR. GOLDBERGER: Did you have the +10 prosecutor's phone number so you could call her? + +11 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +12 instruction. + +13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Did you, in fact, receive a +14 victims' notification letter? + +15 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +16 instruction. + +17 MR. GOLDBERGER: And on that letter, did it +18 not have the prosecutor's direct-dial number? + +19 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +20 instruction. + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: And did the prosecutor, in +22 fact, tell you in person that you could call her at +23 any time to discuss this matter? + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +25 instruction. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 MR. GOLDBERGER: Do you recall receiving a +2 letter from Ms. Villafania when you met with the FBI +3 at Publix in 2007? + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +5 instruction. + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Do you deny that you had +7 Ms. Villafania's direct phone number to call her if +8 you so decided? + +9 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +10 instruction. + +11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Do you know whether the +12 non-prosecution agreement made it easier for you to +13 seek damages against Mr. Epstein? + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +15 instruction. + +16 MR. GOLDBERGER: How many times did you meet +17 with the FBI at Publix to discuss the non-prosecution +18 agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein? + +19 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +20 instruction; also repetitious. + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, I want to make sure we +22 have a record. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: You do. + +1 have a record, okay? + +2 Do you recall being interviewed by Special +3 Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall in August of 2007? + +4 THE WITNESS: I can't remember the exact +5 dates when I met with her. + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Do you recall when you did +7 meet with her, at no time did you ask to confer with +8 anyone from the government about any potential +9 criminal charges, decisions, or about any partial +10 resolution of the matter involving Jeffrey Epstein? + +11 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +12 instruction; also leading. + +13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Is it true that, between the +14 time of that interview in August of 2007, and +15 September of 2007 when Mr. Epstein signed his +16 non-prosecution agreement, you never contacted either +17 Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall or her co-agent asking for +18 information about the investigation; or asking to +19 confer with anyone from the government about any +20 potential criminal charges, decisions, or about the +21 resolution of the matter? + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +23 instruction, leading, compound. + +1 Villafania, Assistant United States Attorney; and + 2 Myesha [REDACTED] from the Justice Department in January, + 3 specifically January 31st of 2008? + +4 THE WITNESS: Now, who was it that I met + 5 with? + +6 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +7 Q. Yes -- well, I'm asking you whether you did meet + 8 with then, first of all, okay? January 31st, 2008 did you + 9 participate in an interview with [REDACTED] Villafania -- + +10 A. Um-hmm. + +11 Q. -- that's the Assistant United States Attorney, + 12 Special Agent Hesbitt Kuyrkendall, and Myesha, + 13 M-y-e-s-h-a, [REDACTED], from the Justice Department? + +14 A. I think that's the time that I met with -- I told + 15 you I met with a group of people, and they were just going + 16 over the victims services, like stuff that they could + 17 offer me to get therapy and stuff like that. I believe + 18 that's the time, I'm not even a hundred-percent sure, and + 19 I can't remember the people's names that I met with. + +20 Q. I understand that. Do you also remember, by the + 21 way, meeting with Willie Ferraire, the U.S. Attorney -- + 22 the acting U.S. Attorney? + +23 A. Umh-umh. + +24 Q. No? + +25 A. No, I don't. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. What complaint? Which -- + +2 Q. The lawsuit. + +3 A. Yes. + +4 Q. Okay, you've reviewed it? Okay. Okay. I'm + 5 going to read you part of that complaint that you said + 6 you've reviewed. "The Plaintiff is included in the list + 7 of victims identified by the federal -- + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, would you + 9 identify -- + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yes. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: -- what you are reading from? + +12 MR. GOLDBERGER: The complaint your client + 13 filed. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: You mean the complaint that + 15 Mr. [REDACTED] filed on behalf of [REDACTED]? + +16 MR. GOLDBERGER: The complaint that your + 17 client Brad [REDACTED] filed on behalf of [REDACTED], yeah. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: And that complaint had + 19 subsequent amendments -- + +20 MR. GOLDBERGER: Right. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: -- so are you reading from the + 22 original complaint or an amended complaint? + +23 MR. GOLDBERGER: It's the same -- whether + 24 it's in the complaint or the amended complaint, the + 25 paragraph that we're going to talk about is in both + +1 Q. Okay. Do you recall getting a letter from + 2 Special [REDACTED] Judge [REDACTED] identifying Robert Josefsberg + 3 as an attorney that the court would find to help sue + 4 Mr. Epstein for restitution? + +5 A. I believe I did receive a mail -- or a letter + 6 stating something like that; that they would -- they would + 7 give me an attorney, but I can't remember exactly what it + 8 said. + +9 Q. Okay. You elected not to take advantage of that, + 10 you used Mr. [REDACTED] as your attorney? + +11 A. Yeah. I think by that time you might have been + 12 my attorney already, yeah. + +13 Q. Okay. And the lawsuit that Mr. Edwards filed + 14 on -- + +15 MR. SCAROLA: The record will reflect that + 16 the "you" in that response was a reference to + 17 Mr. [REDACTED]. + +18 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. By the way, I'm done + 19 -- I think I'm done with the areas I want to proffer + 20 about the NPA so we're going to move on -- + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: -- some other stuff. + +23 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +24 Q. Have you ever actually reviewed the complaint + 25 that Mr. [REDACTED] filed on your behalf? + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 complaints, so you could use the amended complaint or + 2 you can use the original complaint. + +3 MR. [REDACTED]: What -- what -- + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Paragraph 20, yes. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry, which one? + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: 20. And it may be 22 in the + 7 amended complaint, but it's the same exact paragraph. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Well, I have in front of me the + 9 third amended complaint -- + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Can I take a look at it, + 11 then? Maybe I can make the record better if I take a + 12 look at that. + +13 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +14 Q. Okay. Mr. [REDACTED], on your behalf, filed several + 15 complaints on behalf -- amended several complaints? + +16 A. Right. + +17 Q. Okay. And are you aware of a federal lawsuit he + 18 also prepared? + +19 A. Right, the -- + +20 Q. Yes -- yes? + +21 A. The CVR -- + +22 Q. No. Okay. + +23 A. Which lawsuit are we talking about. + +24 Q. Well, let's hold that thought, we'll come back. + 25 I'm not talking about the CVRA case -- + +1 A. Okay. + +2 Q. -- I'm talking about another lawsuit that he +3 prepared, and we'll come back to that in a minute. By the +4 way, when you worked at the strip clubs before you were +5 18 -- + +6 A. Un-hmm. + +7 Q. -- did you have an adult entertainment card? + +8 A. No. + +9 Q. Do you know what that is? + +10 A. Un-hmm. + +11 Q. Okay. What is that? + +12 A. It's a license that you have to have to -- to +13 dance. They made it that you have to have it now, but +14 before you didn't have to have it. But some people did if +15 they would go out of the county -- like out of Palm Beach +16 County. + +17 Q. Yeah. And how old did you have to be to get a +18 adult entertainment card? + +19 A. 18. + +20 Q. Okay. So you were dancing without a card before +21 you were 18? + +22 A. I was dancing without a card when I was 18. + +23 Q. Okay. How about before you were 18? Were you +24 dancing without a card? + +25 A. No. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Are you sure of that? + +2 A. Not to my knowledge. I can't remember him ever +3 saying anything about -- + +4 Q. Okay. Do you remember telling the FBI agents +5 when you were interviewed on August 7th of 2007 that +6 Mr. Epstein counseled you to not use drugs? + +7 A. I don't remember. + +8 MR. EDWARDS: Objection, improper +9 impeachment. If the witness can see the statement -- + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: You don't remember? Would +11 you read the memorandum of interview dated August 7th, +12 2007. I'm going to direct you to -- I only have one +13 copy, you want to look at it first? + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, thank you. Is there a +15 particular section you want to call attention to? + +16 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yep. Actually I maybe do +17 have another copy. No, different -- different +18 interview. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: Do you want to mark the section +20 that you'd like us to -- + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: I night. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: -- us and the witness to +23 review? + +24 MR. GOLDBERGER: I might. Here you go. + +1 Q. No, you were not? + +2 A. I wasn't dancing before -- if I -- a couple times +3 that I would go dance, it would be, like, one night I went +4 to a strip club with a bunch of my friends and I got on +5 stage and made some money, and that was it. But I wasn't, +6 like, working there. I wasn't even supposed to be on +7 stage or anything like that. + +8 Q. All right. At any time when you went to Jeffrey +9 Epstein's house, were there ever any drugs there? + +10 A. No. + +11 Q. Did you ever see any drugs there? + +12 A. No. + +13 Q. Were you ever given alcohol when you were at +14 Mr. Epstein's home? + +15 A. No. + +16 Q. Did you ever see Mr. Epstein drink? + +17 A. No. + +18 Q. When I say "drink," I mean alcohol. + +19 A. Right. + +20 Q. Okay. Were you ever given any pills or drugs at +21 Mr. Epstein's home? + +22 A. No. + +23 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever give you advice about not +24 using illegal drugs? + +25 A. No. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 of this document? + +2 MR. GOLDBERGER: I do not. Maybe I do. Yep. +3 No, different interview. We have not the complete +4 document, but I am concerned about a specific +5 reference in the memorandum of interview concerning +6 whether Mr. Epstein advised the witness to not use +7 controlled substances, and showing her the document to +8 refresh her recollection. + +9 MR. SCAROLA: And both we and the witness +10 have a right to review the document in its entirety, +11 I'm going to object to its use in partial form, but +12 we'll -- + +13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Here you go. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: -- nonetheless -- + +15 MR. GOLDBERGER: Here's the whole document. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. Do you have this +17 document in un-redacted form so we can identify who +18 these people are? + +19 MR. GOLDBERGER: It has never been provided +20 -- as you know as a former prosecutor, Mr. Scarola, +21 certain items are privileged and protected, at that is +22 what we received from the FBI. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: But that's not a response to my +24 question. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Do you have this document in +2 un-redacted form so that we can identify who the +3 interviewee and interviewers are? + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: I've given you everything +5 that -- actually, we probably took it off the +6 discovery you provided to us, so you have everything +7 that we have. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Okay, thank you. And you would +9 like the witness to look at the -- + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: It's a simple question -- + +11 MR. SCAROLA: -- three lines that are +12 highlighted -- well, you have one line highlighted, +13 actually, but do you want her to look at all three +14 lines in that very-short paragraph? + +15 MR. GOLDBERGER: If I've highlighted one line +16 and you think the question is -- requires her to look +17 at the three lines, she may look at the three lines. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: Well, the one line you +19 highlighted for the record read "Epstein with massages +20 said that Epstein tried to provide her." + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Is that what -- + +23 MR. GOLDBERGER: Is there more there that -- +24 I mean, I don't want to play games, if you think +25 there's more -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 MR. SCAROLA: There are no notes on it. + +2 MR. GOLDBERGER: Let me take a look at it. + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Except for your yellow +4 highlighting. + +5 MR. GOLDBERGER: Let me take a look at it. +6 One copy I think I put some notes on it. Sure. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. For the record, I +8 am marking this document consisting of five pages, and +9 I am placing Exhibit Number 1 in the lower right-hand +10 corner. + +11 (Whereupon, Exhibit No. 1 was marked for +12 identification.) + +13 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +14 Q. You ever refer to Jeffrey Epstein as "a fucking +15 Jew"? + +16 A. I may have. + +17 Q. When did you do that, [REDACTED]? When did you refer +18 to Mr. Epstein as a fucking Jew? + +19 A. I don't know, in my past I may have said that. + +20 Q. How many times have you referred to Mr. Epstein +21 as a fucking Jew? + +22 A. I don't remember. + +23 Q. More than once? + +1 MR. SCAROLA: I don't want to play games +2 either, I just want to know what it is that you want +3 to call the witness's attention to -- + +4 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +5 Q. I am highlighting the entire paragraph, "REDACTED +6 used illegal drugs during the year" -- I'll read it into +7 the record. "REDACTED used illegal drugs during the year +8 she provided Epstein with massages. REDACTED said that +9 Epstein tried to provide her with advice regarding +10 controlled substances." That's what I'm asking you: +11 Whether it refreshes your memory as to whether Mr. Epstein +12 ever gave you any advice about using illegal drugs? + +13 A. I can't remember that. + +14 Q. Okay, fair enough. + +15 MR. SCAROLA: I would like this document +16 marked as -- + +17 MR. GOLDBERGER: Sure. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: -- an exhibit to the +19 deposition. + +20 MR. GOLDBERGER: We can do it in a moment. +21 We'll put it over here. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Do you mind if I just write +23 Exhibit Number 1 on the bottom right-hand corner? + +24 MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, that's -- let me make +25 sure my notes aren't -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Yes, it was. + +2 Q. That was anti-semitic? + +3 A. Yes. + +4 Q. How many people have you called -- how many have +5 you said to -- strike that. Have you told more than one +6 person that Mr. Epstein was a fucking Jew? + +7 A. Yes, possibly. + +8 Q. And as you sit here today, you don't know who you +9 made that anti-semitic remark to? + +10 A. I can't remember who I said that to. + +11 Q. When did you first meet Mr. [REDACTED]? + +12 A. Let's see, it's been probably -- I can't remember +13 how long it's been since I met you. It's been a while. + +14 Q. Do you know how you met Mr. [REDACTED]? + +15 A. Yes, through Jay Howell. + +16 Q. Jay Howell is a lawyer? + +17 A. Yes. + +18 Q. Would that have been back in 2007 or 2008 +19 perhaps? + +20 A. That sounds about right, yes. + +21 Q. Okay. Do you know Paul Cassel? + +22 A. Yes. + +23 Q. Okay. Have you met Paul Cassel? + +1 A. Maybe like three times. + 2 Q. Okay. Once when you were brought over in custody + 3 for the mediation in the CVRA case? + 4 A. Yes. + 5 Q. And you've met him other times? + 6 A. Yes. + 7 Q. Two other times? + 8 A. Yes. + 9 Q. Okay. You know you're a plaintiff in that CVRA + 10 case; right? + 11 A. Yes. + 12 Q. Okay. Did you sign any kind of engagement letter + 13 on that case? + 14 A. I don't understand what that means. + 15 Q. Sure. When you sued Mr. Epstein for money -- + 16 A. Uh-huh. + 17 Q. -- you signed a contract; right? + 18 A. Right. + 19 Q. And it set forth the terms for which Mr. [REDACTED] + 20 was going to represent you; right? + 21 A. Right. + 22 Q. Did you sign one of those on the CVRA case also? + 23 A. I don't believe so, no. + 24 Q. Okay. Are you funding the CVRA case in any way? + 25 A. No. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Okay. Can I see that document please? How old + 2 were you when you first met Mr. Epstein? + 3 A. I was 14. + 4 Q. Do you remember telling the FBI that you were + 5 close to 16 when you met Mr. Epstein? + 6 A. I don't remember saying that. + 7 Q. Would it refresh your memory to look at the + 8 exhibit that Mr. Scarola has marked as Exhibit 1? And let + 9 me direct you to the second full paragraph. + 10 MR. SCAROLA: May I see that first, please? + 11 THE WITNESS: Um-hmm. + 12 MR. SCAROLA: And your question is does this + 13 paragraph refresh -- + 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Her -- + 15 MR. SCAROLA: -- MR. [REDACTED] recollection that + 16 she told the FBI that she was 16? + 17 MR. GOLDBERGER: Very good. Correct. + 18 MR. SCAROLA: Do you want to read that + 19 paragraph again and see -- + 20 MR. GOLDBERGER: Sure. + 21 MR. SCAROLA: -- whether that's the question + 22 that you want to ask since it doesn't say anything + 23 like that? In fact, it says she was 15. + 24 MR. GOLDBERGER: Who's close to turning 16. + 25 Did you tell the FBI -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Well, is there a difference + 2 between being 15 and 16? + 3 MR. GOLDBERGER: Not really. Not in my mind. + 4 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. + 5 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + 6 MR. SCAROLA: And not Mr. Epstein's either, I + 7 guess. + 8 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Move to strike. + 9 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 10 Q. Did you tell the FBI that you were close to 16 + 11 when you first met Mr. Epstein? + 12 A. I can't really remember me ever saying I was 16 + 13 years old. + 14 Q. Okay. Do you remember telling Mr. Epstein when + 15 you first met him that you were 18? + 16 A. No. + 17 Q. Okay. Would it refresh your memory to look at + 18 the memorandum of interview concerning the interview you + 19 did with the FBI in August of 2007 and what you told the + 20 agent about what you told Mr. Epstein is your age? + 21 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. I'm going to object + 22 to the form of the question. It assumes that the + 23 redactions in that document, which obviously relate to + 24 multiple individuals identify, [REDACTED] as a + 25 particular speaker. + +1 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Having said that, + 2 would you look at that and see if it refreshes your + 3 recollection as to whether you told Mr. Epstein when + 4 you first met him you were 18 years old? + 5 MR. SCAROLA: The same second paragraph? + 6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Same second paragraph, thank + 7 you. The last line of the second paragraph. + 8 MR. SCAROLA: The last line. + 9 MR. GOLDBERGER: Um-hmm. + 10 THE WITNESS: No, I don't remember saying + 11 that. + 12 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 13 Q. Okay. Did you, in fact, tell Mr. Epstein that + 14 you were 18 when you first met him? + 15 A. No. + 16 Q. Did you tell him how old you were? + 17 A. I don't believe I ever told him how old I was, + 18 no. + 19 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Here you go. I'm + 20 going to go into some additional questions about the + 21 CVRA, and I recognize that you're going to instruct + 22 the witness not to answer the questions; and so we + 23 have some ground rules for this, is it the same + 24 objections that it's irrelevant and she does not have + 25 the ability to consult with her lawyer, or do you want + +1 me to ask the questions first? + +2 MR. SCAROLA: No, no, that's not an accurate +3 statement -- + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, give me your accurate +5 assessment then. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. The questions are +7 irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to +8 lead to the discovery of relevant and material +9 information in this lawsuit. + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: In addition to that, this +12 witness was not noticed as being deposed in a separate +13 CVRA action. Her counsel, with regard to the separate +14 CVRA action were not noticed, therefore her counsel +15 have not had an opportunity to consult with her +16 regarding giving testimony in the separate CVRA -- + +17 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: -- action. So those are the +19 objections that were previously raised, in addition to +20 others stated as to specific questions, they are of +21 the objections that I will incorporate simply by +22 saying "same objection, same instruction," for +23 purposes of not burdening the record with repetition +24 of the same objection and same instructions. + +25 MR. GOLDBERGER: Have you now stated all the + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 lawsuit? + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +3 instruction. + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Have you ever discussed with +5 any non-lawyer, or someone working for a lawyer, the +6 reasons for filing the CVRA case? + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +8 instruction. + +9 MR. GOLDBERGER: Do you realize that if you +10 prevail on the CVRA case and the non-prosecution +11 agreement is ruled void, any civil settlement that +12 relied on the Civil Victims' Rights Act case could be +13 vacated? + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +15 instruction; also calls for a legal conclusion. + +16 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: Based upon an improper +18 hypothesis. + +19 MR. GOLDBERGER: Are you seeking an apology +20 from the government for the filing of the CVR -- by +21 filing the CVRA case? + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +23 instruction. + +1 objections you want to state concerning any questions +2 I'm going to have concerning the CVRA, subject to a +3 specific question? + +4 MR. SCAROLA: I have stated all of the +5 objections that I wish to incorporate in an +6 abbreviated objection and instruction. + +7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. + +8 What were your goals as a plaintiff in filing +9 the CVRA case? + +10 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +11 instruction. + +12 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Was one of your goals +13 to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement? + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +15 instruction. + +16 MR. EDWARDS: Can we just take one -- one +17 second -- + +18 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yeah, you want to talk her, +19 that's fine. + +20 [Whereupon, a pause was had in the +21 deposition.] + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Are you good? + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Yeah. + +24 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Have you ever +25 discussed with ██████████ the filing of the CVRA + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same +2 instruction. + +3 MR. GOLDBERGER: Are you attempting to punish +4 Jeffrey Epstein by causing the loss of the +5 non-prosecution agreement? + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Same objection, same -- +7 actually, I will withdraw that objection. + +8 THE WITNESS: What was the question? + +9 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +10 Q. Um-hmm. Are you attempting to punish Jeffrey +11 Epstein by causing the non-prosecution agreement to be set +12 aside? + +13 A. I -- I just feel like justice should be served +14 and he should be put in jail for the crimes he's +15 committed. + +16 Q. Okay. Do you blame him for being in jail right +17 now, ██████████? + +18 A. No, I -- I've made my own choices, but I do +19 believe that a lot of the trauma that I have is due to +20 what happened to me when I was a young girl because of +21 Jeffrey. + +22 Q. I want to talk to you a little bit about ██████████ +23 ██████████; when did you first meet her? + +1 when you met her? + 2 A. Younger. + 3 Q. How much younger? + 4 A. She's like a year younger than me. + 5 Q. Okay. And where did you meet her? + 6 A. I met her through a friend. + 7 Q. Did you meet her at a party perhaps? + 8 A. I can't remember exactly. I know I met her + 9 through a friend, though. + 10 Q. Un-hmm. Okay. What friend was that? + 11 A. I think it was my -- a boy that I was dating + 12 named Jessie. + 13 Q. Okay. + 14 A. But he was just -- we were just friends at first, + 15 but I think that's how. Or maybe -- I can't remember. I + 16 can't remember. + 17 Q. Do you know a boy named Bobby? + 18 A. Unh-unh. + 19 Q. Okay. + 20 A. No. + 21 Q. Do you know where the party was? + 22 A. No, I don't remember that. + 23 Q. Okay. Would you consider [REDACTED] to be your + 24 good friend when you first met her? + 25 A. Yeah. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Okay. And does she continue to be your good + 2 friend? + 3 A. We're still friends. + 4 Q. Okay. + 5 A. I haven't talked to her in a while, though. + 6 Q. Okay. Was there a time where you lived -- + 7 actually [REDACTED] father let you live at his house? + 8 A. Yes. + 9 Q. Okay. And when was that, [REDACTED]? + 10 A. When I was 14/15, for two years. + 11 Q. Okay. Did you ever have sex with [REDACTED]? + 12 A. No, not when I was a young girl. I don't think + 13 that we did. + 14 Q. Okay. Did you ever have oral sex with [REDACTED] + 15 [REDACTED] prior to being 18? + 16 A. Yes. + 17 Q. Okay. When did that take place? + 18 A. I can't remember -- + 19 Q. Okay. + 20 A. -- exactly. + 21 Q. Was it at a party, or was it in private? + 22 A. I can't remember. + 23 Q. Okay. But you do remember having oral sex with + 24 her? + 25 A. I know that we have, yes. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Do you know how many times you've had oral sex + 2 with [REDACTED]? + 3 A. No. + 4 Q. Okay. Is [REDACTED] the one who recruited you + 5 to go to Jeffrey Epstein's home? + 6 A. Yes. + 7 Q. Yes? + 8 A. Yes. + 9 Q. Okay. Did you go to Mr. Epstein's house together + 10 the first time? + 11 A. Yeah. + 12 Q. Okay. At other times that you may have been at + 13 Mr. Epstein's house, did you see [REDACTED] there? + 14 A. Any time I -- if I didn't go with her, it was -- + 15 sometimes I'd go by myself, sometimes I'd bring girls; I + 16 never went there and [REDACTED] was there. + 17 Q. Okay. Did you ever talk to her about + 18 Mr. Epstein? + 19 A. Yes. + 20 Q. Okay. What discussions did you have concerning + 21 Mr. Epstein? + 22 A. I can't remember the discussions now, what we + 23 talked about. + 24 Q. Do you know if [REDACTED] had ever claimed + 25 whether Mr. Epstein was physically violent to her? + +1 A. I don't believe she's ever said that to me. + 2 Q. Okay. Did [REDACTED] tell you in going to -- + 3 MR. GOLDBERGER: You can go ahead? + 4 MR. [REDACTED]: I feel like that canteen would + 5 be useful right now. + 6 THE WITNESS: Yeah. + 7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Go off the record for a + 8 second. + 9 (Whereupon, a pause was had in the + 10 deposition.) + 11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Back on. I saw it coming. + 12 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 13 Q. Did [REDACTED] tell you that, in going to + 14 Mr. Epstein's house, your choice to get naked was, in + 15 fact, a choice that you could make? + 16 A. Yeah, she said that he would like if I took all + 17 my clothes off, but I didn't have to, I could keep my + 18 panties on if I wanted to. + 19 Q. Okay. Did [REDACTED] tell you to lie about your + 20 age when going to Mr. Epstein's house? + 21 A. No. + 22 Q. Now, did [REDACTED] tell you that, as part of a + 23 massage, Mr. Epstein would ejaculate into his own hand? + 24 A. Yeah, she did tell me that. + 25 Q. Un-hmm. And did she tell you that prior to your + +1 going there? + +2 A. She really didn't -- I don't -- I can't remember +3 if she said that to me or not. I don't -- for some +4 reason, I want to say she didn't, but I -- it's been so +5 long, I don't know. + +6 Q. So your recollection is at some point [REDACTED] +7 told you that Mr. Epstein would ejaculate into his hand? + +8 A. Yes, I think so. + +9 Q. But you don't remember when she told you this -- + +10 A. Right. + +11 Q. -- right? Okay. Had he ever ejaculated into his +12 hand while you were massaging him prior to [REDACTED] +13 telling you that? "He" being Mr. Epstein, I'm sorry. + +14 A. I mean, the first time I went to -- ever met him, +15 that's what he did, he ejaculated into his own hand so -- + +16 Q. So -- + +17 A. After the first time, we didn't really have to +18 talk about it, because that's something that did happen. + +19 Q. So you have a recollection of [REDACTED] having +20 told you that Mr. Epstein would ejaculate into his hand +21 during a massage? + +22 A. I can't remember if she told me or not -- + +23 Q. Okay. + +24 A. -- before we went. + +25 Q. Okay. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. So being advised that that might happen occurred +2 prior to your first visit with Mr. Epstein? + +3 A. I can't remember if she -- I mean, I guess so. + +4 Q. Okay. + +5 A. I'm not really sure. + +6 Q. Do you know whether Tatum [REDACTED] works as a +7 prostitute? + +8 A. I don't know, I haven't talked to her in a couple +9 years. + +10 Q. Okay. Do you know whether she was working as a +11 prostitute after she last saw Jeffrey Epstein? + +12 A. No, I don't know -- + +13 Q. Okay. + +14 A. -- if she was -- + +15 Q. Did you go with [REDACTED] to New York on a trip paid +16 by some men? + +17 A. Yes. + +18 Q. Okay. And during that trip that you went to New +19 York with some men, did [REDACTED] leave to go on some +20 prostitution dates? + +21 A. I'm not sure where she went when she left. + +22 Q. But she left? + +23 A. Yeah. + +24 Q. Okay. Did you ever visit [REDACTED] at Fantasies +25 where she worked? + +1 THE WITNESS: Do ya'll want to take a break? + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Sure, if you'd like to. + +3 THE WITNESS: Okay, yeah. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +5 VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is approximately +6 12:24 p.m., and we're off the record. + +7 (Whereupon, a recess was had in the +8 deposition.) + +9 VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is approximately +10 12:29 p.m and we're back on the record. + +11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you. + +12 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +13 Q. All right, so you testified, I believe -- and +14 correct me if I'm wrong -- that you had some sort of +15 discussion with [REDACTED] Miller about Jeffrey Epstein +16 ejaculating into his hand while getting a massage; +17 correct? + +18 A. Right. + +19 Q. And you don't recall when that -- when you were +20 told that that would occur? + +21 A. Right. + +22 Q. Okay. But did you also testify that the first +23 time you gave a massage to Mr. Epstein, he ejaculated into +24 his hand? + +25 A. Yes. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. I can't -- I don't think so. + +2 Q. Okay. Do you know what Fantasies is? + +3 A. Unh-unh. + +4 Q. Okay. + +5 A. Well, I know that she worked at some place like +6 that, but I can't remember the name of it. + +7 Q. What do you mean by that, what do you mean by +8 "some place like that," what is "that"? + +9 A. Like a -- like a prostitution house, or whatever. +10 I don't know what you'd call it. + +11 Q. Okay. Did you ever use the term "Jack Shack"? + +12 A. Okay, yeah. + +13 Q. What is a Jack Shack? + +14 A. Like a prosecution house. + +15 Q. Okay. And you knew that [REDACTED] worked at a Jack +16 Shack? + +17 A. Um-hmm. + +18 Q. Okay. Did you ever see any websites offering +19 [REDACTED] services? + +20 A. No, I don't -- + +21 Q. Was your mother a drug addict -- is your mother a +22 drug addict also? + +23 A. She's been clean for the past six years, but when +24 I was young, she was addicted to drugs. + +1 your meeting Jeffrey Epstein? + 2 A. Yes. + 3 (A discussion was held off the record.) + 4 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 5 Q. How many people did you take to Jeffrey Epstein's + 6 home to work as a massage -- to give massages to + 7 Mr. Epstein? + 8 A. Like, 20 or 30 girls. + 9 Q. Okay. And did you receive money for bringing + 10 people to Mr. Epstein's home? + 11 A. Yes. + 12 Q. Do you know who DD is? + 13 A. Unh-unh. + 14 Q. Okay. Did you keep a list or a journal of people + 15 that you took to Mr. Epstein's home? + 16 A. No. + 17 Q. You didn't do that? No, you did not? + 18 A. No -- + 19 Q. Okay. + 20 A. -- I did not. + 21 Q. Did you take women who were of age -- meaning, + 22 over age 18 -- to Mr. Epstein's home for massages? + 23 A. No, I always took people that were underage. + 24 Q. Okay. Do you ever remember answering that + 25 question differently, whether you brought girls who were + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 over the age of 18 to Mr. Epstein's home? + 2 A. Actually, now that I think about it, there was + 3 this girl named Any that was over age that went to him, + 4 but I don't remember bringing anybody else besides her. + 5 Q. Do you remember giving a deposition on May 6, + 6 2010 in this case -- or in the related case? + 7 A. Yes. + 8 Q. And were you sworn to tell the truth in that + 9 deposition? + 10 A. Right. + 11 Q. And were you telling the truth? + 12 A. Yes. + 13 Q. And did you have your lawyer, Brad [REDACTED], there + 14 with you during that deposition? + 15 A. Yes. + 16 Q. Do you remember giving an answer to this + 17 question "Well, you know you took MD because she was + 18 23" -- Page 131, Line 6, "Well you know" -- + 19 MR. SCAROLA: May we have a copy of the + 20 deposition? + 21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yeah. Do you have an extra + 22 copy, Page 131? + 23 MR. [REDACTED]: I do, Page 131. + 24 MR. SCAROLA: Okay, thank you. + 25 / / / / + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 2 Q. Okay, well you took -- do you remember + 3 being asked this question, "Well, you know you took MD + 4 because she was 23?" + 5 Your answer: "I probably took about three + 6 girls of age." + 7 Your question, "You mean that were 18 or + 8 over?" + 9 And your answer, "Correct." Okay, so does + 10 that -- do you remember having -- + 11 A. There's -- Yeah, I know that I took the one girl, + 12 Any, but I'm -- there's possibly a couple more. I know + 13 that everybody else that I took was underage. + 14 Q. Right. And then you went on to say that you took + 15 20 to 30 girls allegedly who were under 18 to + 16 Mr. Epstein's house? + 17 MR. SCAROLA: No, she did not say allegedly. + 18 The question is "How many girls do you believe that + 19 you took under 18?" Answer: "At least, at least 20 + 20 to 30." + 21 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 22 Q. And every one of those girls that you took to + 23 Mr. Epstein's home, whether they were of age or underage, + 24 you received money for bringing them there, did you not? + 25 A. Yes. + +1 Q. Okay. Did you ever break into Mr. Epstein's + 2 home, burglarize his home? + 3 A. No, I did go there one time and I didn't never + 4 burglarize his home, though. + 5 Q. Well, did you enter his home without his + 6 permission? + 7 A. Yes. So I guess that would be burglarizing it I + 8 guess you could say. + 9 Q. Okay. + 10 A. Yes, I did do that one time. + 11 Q. What did you do? + 12 A. I went there without his permission. + 13 Q. And entered his home? + 14 A. Yes. + 15 Q. Okay. Did you have someone with you when you did + 16 that? + 17 A. Yeah, I had somebody that drove me there. + 18 Q. And who was that? + 19 A. I can't remember who it was now. + 20 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever call you on the telephone? + 21 A. Yes. + 22 Q. Okay. And was there ever any discussion of + 23 sexual conduct during those phone calls? + 24 A. What do you mean by that? + 25 Q. Yeah, did you talk about sex when he called you? + +1 A. No, he just always asked me if I had anybody to + 2 bring to him. + 3 Q. Okay. Did you ever call Mr. Epstein's home and + 4 speak to either Mr. Epstein or someone who worked for + 5 Mr. Epstein and ask for permission to come over and give a + 6 massage? + 7 A. Yes. + 8 Q. Okay. How many times did you do that? + 9 A. I can't remember how many times. + 10 Q. Did you ever ask to introduce another girl to + 11 Mr. Epstein? + 12 A. Yeah, he would ask me, if I met a girl that + 13 wanted to come to him, to call and let them know, his + 14 secretary or him or whoever answered the phone -- normally + 15 it was his secretary if I called. + 16 Q. Any calls you made then would be calls to set up + 17 appointments; right? + 18 A. Right. + 19 Q. No discussion about sex? + 20 A. Right. + 21 Q. During any of those phone calls, did Mr. Epstein + 22 say anything that he was attempting to persuade or induce + 23 you or entice you to engage in sex? + 24 A. No. + 25 Q. Okay. Did you ever negotiate over the phone + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 prices or anything like that? + 2 A. No. + 3 Q. Did you ever email with Mr. Epstein in any way? + 4 A. No. + 5 Q. Did you ever have any kind of internet + 6 conversation with Mr. Epstein? + 7 A. No. + 8 Q. Did you ever have any text conversation with + 9 Mr. Epstein? + 10 A. No. + 11 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever have any email or internet + 12 conversation with you about bringing another person to his + 13 home? + 14 A. No. + 15 Q. To give a massage, I'm talking about. + 16 A. Right. + 17 Q. Okay. Did anyone either employed by Mr. Epstein + 18 or associated with Mr. Epstein ever email you? + 19 A. No. + 20 Q. Did you ever travel with Mr. Epstein? + 21 A. No. + 22 Q. Did Mr. Epstein use his own name when he spoke to + 23 you? + 24 A. Jeffrey, yeah. + 25 Q. Didn't use a name like Taylor -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. No. + 2 Q. -- or anything like that? You knew you were + 3 going to his house to make money; is that correct? + 4 A. Yes. + 5 Q. And you were acting as a prostitute when you went + 6 there? + 7 A. Yes. + 8 Q. Okay. No one forced you to go, it was your + 9 choice to go; correct? + 10 A. Yes. + 11 Q. You had a choice to say no if you wanted to say + 12 no? + 13 A. Yes. + 14 Q. Was there ever any physical force that was used + 15 by anyone at Mr. Epstein's home to coerce you or force you + 16 to engage in any act? + 17 A. No. + 18 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever threaten to use physical + 19 force against you? + 20 A. No. + 21 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever use physical violence + 22 against you? + 23 A. No. + 24 Q. Did Mr. Epstein ever raise his voice to you? + 25 A. Never, like, face-to-face. A couple times there + +1 was times I was supposed to bring a girl, and the girl + 2 canceled or the girl ended up not wanting to come or + 3 something like that, so there was a couple times on the + 4 phone where he yelled at me, like just frustrated about me + 5 not bringing the girl. + 6 Q. Okay. Other than that, any other yelling? + 7 A. No. + 8 Q. When you were brought there the first -- you were + 9 brought there the first time by [REDACTED]; correct? + 10 A. Un-hmm. + 11 Q. And [REDACTED], told you that it was + 12 your choice whether to take off your clothes or not? + 13 A. Yeah, she said that he wanted me to take off my + 14 clothes, but I didn't have to get completely asked, I + 15 could keep my panties on if I wanted to. + 16 Q. Okay. If my math is correct, and correct me if + 17 I'm wrong, Mr. [REDACTED] has represented you for ten years + 18 now; is that correct? + 19 A. Yes. + 20 Q. Okay. Is there any time during the last ten + 21 years that Mr. [REDACTED] has not represented you? + 22 A. No. + 23 Q. Okay. Did you fire him at any time? + 24 A. No. + 25 Q. Okay. Did he ever get you a lawyer on any of the + +1 -- well, on this criminal case that has you in prison + 2 right now -- + 3 A. No. + 4 Q. -- did he ever get you a lawyer at any other + 5 time? + 6 A. No. + 7 Q. Okay. You knew at some point that he -- that + 8 "he," Mr. ██████████, went to work for the Rothstein Adler + 9 firm? + 10 A. Yes. + 11 Q. Okay. When did you learn that, ██████████? + 12 A. I went -- one time I went to the law form to meet + 13 him, just to -- I can't even remember what it was for, and + 14 I know that he just moved different law firms, but -- + 15 Q. Okay. And I'm talking about the law firm + 16 Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler; right? + 17 A. Yes. + 18 Q. We're talking about the same firm? + 19 A. Right. + 20 Q. And you went to that law firm to meet + 21 Mr. ██████████? + 22 A. Yes. + 23 Q. Okay. And you don't know when that was? + 24 A. No. + 25 Q. Okay. Who did you meet when you went to the law + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. Okay. How long were you there when you went + 2 there? + 3 A. I can't remember how long I was there, maybe an + 4 hour. + 5 Q. Okay. Did you learn at some point that + 6 Mr. Epstein -- I'm sorry, that Mr. Edwards was sued by + 7 Mr. Epstein as being part of the Rothstein form? + 8 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, if -- + 9 MR. GOLDBERGER: Without -- + 10 MR. SCAROLA: If any knowledge you have -- + 11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yeah. + 12 MR. SCAROLA: -- with regard to the lawsuit + 13 by Mr. Epstein against Brad is information that Brad + 14 communicated to you during the course of your + 15 attorney/client relationship with Brad, you should not + 16 respond to that question. If you know anything at all + 17 about that lawsuit from some source other than + 18 communications with Brad, then by all means you are + 19 entitled to and obliged to answer that question. + 20 THE WITNESS: Okay. + 21 MR. GOLDBERGER: That's correct. That's + 22 correct. + 23 THE WITNESS: Yeah, so I don't want to answer + 24 it, I guess. + 25 // // // + +1 firm? + 2 A. I just met Brad. + 3 Q. Brad ██████████? + 4 A. Brad ██████████. + 5 Q. Did you meet any of the other people that worked + 6 there? + 7 A. No, I can't remember meeting anybody else. + 8 Q. Did you meet any investigators? + 9 A. No. + 10 Q. Mr. Fisten (phonetic?) + 11 A. No. + 12 Q. Did you meet Mr. Ken Jenne who had formerly been + 13 the sheriff of Broward County? + 14 A. No. + 15 Q. Did you meet any other lawyers at the ██████████ -- + 16 at the Rothstein office? + 17 A. No. + 18 Q. Did you meet any of Mr. Edward's support staff? + 19 A. No. + 20 Q. So you went there and you walked in the door and + 21 you just met Mr. ██████████ and you didn't meet anybody else? + 22 A. I mean, if I walked past other people there -- + 23 could have been working there, that's a possibility, but I + 24 didn't -- wasn't introduced to anybody or didn't have a + 25 conversation with anybody else. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + 2 Q. All right, so what you're saying is that anything + 3 you learned, you would have learned from Mr. ██████████, and + 4 you didn't learn from anybody else? + 5 A. Right. + 6 Q. Okay. Did you read anything about the Rothstein + 7 Ponzi scheme? + 8 A. Yeah, I think I seen it on the news when it first + 9 happened, when I was in West Palm Beach. + 10 Q. Okay. And when you saw that on the news, did you + 11 realize that Mr. ██████████ was working for that law firm? + 12 A. Yeah, I think I actually called him and he -- + 13 Q. Don't tell me what he told you. + 14 A. Okay. Yeah. + 15 Q. Okay. Did you discuss that with anybody else? + 16 A. No. + 17 Q. Okay. When you learned about the Rothstein Adler + 18 Ponzi scheme, that Mr. ██████████ was working there, did it + 19 cause you to fire Mr. ██████████? + 20 A. No. + 21 Q. Okay. Did it cause you to doubt his professional + 22 competence in any way? + 23 A. No. + 24 Q. Okay. Did you talk to ██████████ or ██████████ + 25 ██████████ about the Rothstein Ponzi scheme? + +1 A. I can't remember. + +2 Q. Okay. Do you know whether either of those two + 3 women terminated their relationship with Mr. [REDACTED] as a + 4 result of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme? + +5 A. I don't think so. + +6 Q. While your state case was pending in state court + 7 where you were seeking damages from Mr. Epstein, did you + 8 know that Mr. [REDACTED] also had asked to have prepared a + 9 federal lawsuit? I'm not talking about the CVRA case, but + 10 a separate federal lawsuit seeking damages for you against + 11 Mr. Epstein? + +12 MR. [REDACTED]: Object as to attorney/client + 13 privilege to the extent that she knows that + 14 information only from any conversation that she had + 15 with me -- + +16 MR. GOLDBERGER: Sure. + +17 MR. [REDACTED]: -- at that time. + +18 MR. GOLDBERGER: Sure. + +19 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +20 Q. So other than conversations you had with + 21 Mr. [REDACTED] or one of the other lawyers working at the + 22 Rothstein Adler firm, did you know that Mr. [REDACTED] had + 23 asked to be prepared a federal lawsuit that was the same + 24 lawsuit that was pending against Mr. Epstein in state + 25 court -- + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. No. + +2 Q. -- essentially the same claims? + +3 A. No. + +4 Q. Okay. Do you know that he had asked his support + 5 staff to file or to prepare the same lawsuit in federal + 6 court that had been prepared on behalf of [REDACTED]? + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Same instructions; that is, you + 8 should not answer that question if the source of any + 9 information, if any, was Brad [REDACTED]. If you + 10 obtained that information from some other source and + 11 you have any information in response to that question, + 12 you can answer it. + +13 THE WITNESS: Okay, so I guess I shouldn't + 14 answer it then. + +15 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +16 Q. Okay, that's fine. Has anyone shared any emails + 17 with you concerning instructions being given to file -- or + 18 to prepare a federal lawsuit for filing? + +19 A. No. + +20 Q. And I'm asking you specifically the time period + 21 just before the Rothstein form fell apart and + 22 Mr. Rothstein was indicted. + +23 A. No. + +24 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. Can we just have a + 25 moment? Off the record for a second. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is approximately + +2 12:52 p.m. and we are off the record. + +3 (Whereupon, a recess was had in the + 4 deposition.) + +5 VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is approximately + +6 12:55 p.m. and we are back on the record. + +7 BY MR. GOLDBERGER: + +8 Q. I was asking you about whether you knew anything + 9 about this federal lawsuit that may or may not have been + 10 prepared. Did you ever see a federal lawsuit other than + 11 the CVRA case, I'm not talking about that? + +12 A. No. + +13 Q. Okay. Did you ever authorize the preparation of + 14 a separate federal lawsuit seeking damages from + 15 Mr. Epstein in addition to the state court case? + +16 MR. [REDACTED]: I object attorney/client + 17 privilege to the extent that this is -- + +18 MR. GOLDBERGER: Let me just finish the + 19 question. Let just finish the question, okay? + +20 MR. [REDACTED]: You're talking about authorized + 21 to me, this is -- + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yeah, let me just finish the + 23 question -- + +1 MR. GOLDBERGER: Let me just finish the + 2 question, then I get it, okay? + +3 MR. [REDACTED]: Okay. + +4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Did you ever authorize the + 5 filing of a federal lawsuit seeking damages against + 6 Mr. Epstein that was similar or the same as the state + 7 case that Mr. [REDACTED] had filed on your behalf for + 8 damages against Mr. Epstein? + +9 MR. [REDACTED]: Okay. And before you would + 10 answer -- + +11 THE WITNESS: Um-hmm. + +12 MR. [REDACTED]: -- if this is communication + 13 between me and you, whether you to me or -- + +14 THE WITNESS: Right. + +15 MR. [REDACTED]: -- me to you related to a legal + 16 decision that we were making at the time, then I'm + 17 instructing you not to answer because that could be + 18 invasion of the attorney/client privilege. + +19 THE WITNESS: Right. + +20 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. So with that + 21 instruction from your lawyer, do you want to answer + 22 the question or not? + +23 THE WITNESS: No. + +## CROSS trANINAT3011 + +2 It MR. SCA10140 + +3 . did you sue Jeffrey tplflein for having 4 repeatedly sexually 00 CCCCC d you because you actually were S repeatedly Sexually molested by Jeffrey tp CCCCC ? + +6 A. Yea. + +7 MR. OOLDSLIWER. Object to the fore. + +MR. SCAROLA: Was cher, any reason other than 9 the fact that Jeffrey Bp stein had repeatedly select .- 10 excuse ne, repeatedly sexually et> eeeee d you that you 11 were suing Jeffrey lip + +12 RR. DOLOSEROtil, Object to the fors. + +II Mo. + +14 MR. BCAROLA: Whether it was age 14. IS. Or is 16, it there any doubt that Jeffrey Epstein began 14 \*pleating you eeeee before you turned In + +It Mt. CALLOW/MR: Object to the fore. + +15 There.\* no doubt. yeah. he It started noleeting as when I was 14. 20 Rt. SCAROLA: And did he con eeeee to amplest 21 you for years after these eeeeeee tions began? 22 MR. OtitlIsTROER: Object to the fern. 23 TtlE vITNtile: Yes. 24 SY MR. 'CAROL!. + +25 O. You said that there were approxisately 20 to 30 + +1 girls Chat you took to Jeffrey tpifleinfl. hone? + +A. Right. + +0. Why did you bring those girls to Jeffrey 4 epistle's bone? + +A. E guess to sake money. because he told aro he 6 would pay for 200 5200 dollars we, and 3300 dollars for / every girl I brought. + +Q. And were you, in fact. paid for the young girls that you brought to Mr. tp eeeee w house? + +10 + +II Q. You ale\* Said that the vast tyloritr of those 12 girls. with the mettlee of perha t\4 or three, were II underage? + +14 A. Yes. + +IS O. Why were you br \*rage girls to Jeffrey 16 tpalLeinW hone? + +11 A. Because h wanted the girls young. + +it Id bring girls that looked It would just walk out. Re 20 Id le a the coney On the counter end just 21 walk a fed the girls young. + +22 position began with ease Significant + +23 •ut your Involvement with criminal 15w. do that? + +Yes. + +NOR TEE RECORD Rt1ORTIIIMI TIJAAXASSER, TUMID& 1150 222.1491 L NOR TIM RECORD 11113:01rrINO TAINNOStitt. 1MORIDA 11\$0.232•5401 + +O. Do you know how easy of the of eeeee e 2 today brought up by Mr. ttetein's defense la r we I offenses that occurred while you were • 1 4 A. There was one. I got in treg one L1ee wham I + +S was • juvenile. + +6 O. Okay. to It was at + +7 offenses + +5 A. Yes. + +O. -- when you ven1140 + +10 MR Object to the fore. + +11 MY MR. SCA110 + +12 There • also some discussion about how those II were diep ed of. Do you know the difference 14 between • guilty plea and • plea of no contest? + +IS A. MO contest is you're not plead -- you're not + +16 seying •• 0:Witting to It fullya correct? + +I/ Q. 1 want you to eeeeee that to be the case. + +10 A. Yeah. + +19 Q. Do you know which specific Charges were disposed 20 of by guilty plea •• opposed to having been disposed of by 21 no-cont•st. plan + +22 A. Me. • • not sure. + +21 Q. All right. And do you know that there. Is • 24 difference between an adjudication of guilt. and hawing an 25 adjudication of guilt withheld by the court even after • + +120 + +I plea of no contest) + +2 Right -- + +3 KR. 00101111WER, Objection -- object to the • fora of the question. + +5 TIE WITNESS: Sorry• say it again. Say -- + +6 MR. &CAROL.), Do you recognise that there is 7 • distinction as to whether the court mil you • guilty or withholds adjudication even after • plea of + +no contest to a c eeeeeee charge? 10 HR. 0050DEROER, Object to the fora. + +11 TIM WITNESS. Right. I know that there • 12 difference. and I can't even tell you really what the I) difference as. + +14 SY MR. DCAROLA; + +IS O. Okay. Do you know whether you were adjudicated It guilty. or whether adjudication was withheld with regard + +17 to each of the circumstances that Mr. Epstein'.. 15 lawyer described? + +19 A. Yo. I believe • couple of them were withheld -- 20 adjudicated withheld. + +21 O. Okay. Yaw told vs that you started wipe) 22 in 2002 when you were age 14: correct? + +2) Yes. + +24 Q. Is there any doubt in your nind that your use of 25 drugs began after Jeffrey [wean began abusing you? + +1 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +2 THE WITNESS: No. + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. You talked about having been naked in the +5 presence of Jeffrey Epstein when you were 14 years of age. + +6 A. (Witness nods head.) + +7 Q. Prior to having been naked in the presence of +8 Jeffrey Epstein when you were 14, had you ever previously +9 been naked in the presence of a man? + +10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +11 THE WITNESS: No. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Had you ever worked as a dancer +13 or stripper before Jeffrey Epstein began paying you to +14 permit him to molest you? + +15 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +16 THE WITNESS: No. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: Had you ever had a sexual +18 experience with another female before Jeffrey Epstein +19 began paying you to permit him to sexually molest you? + +20 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +21 THE WITNESS: No. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Had you ever had a drug abuse +23 problem before Jeffrey Epstein began regularly paying +24 you for sex at age 147? + +25 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 THE WITNESS: No. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Had you ever been convicted of +3 a crime before Jeffrey Epstein began paying you at age +4 14 to allow him to molest you? + +5 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +6 THE WITNESS: No. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: In addition to the 20 to 30 +8 young girls that you personally were paid to bring to +9 Mr. Epstein's home, are you aware of others who were +10 being paid by Jeffrey Epstein while they were under +11 age 18 to allow Jeffrey Epstein to sexually molest +12 them? + +13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +14 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +15 MR. SCAROLA: Can you give us an estimate as +16 to the number of other girls apart from those that you +17 brought -- + +18 THE WITNESS: Un-hmm. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: -- who were being paid by +20 Jeffrey Epstein? + +21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Form. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: -- to allow Jeffrey Epstein to +23 sexually molest them? + +24 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +25 THE WITNESS: There's so -- there's so + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 many -- in West Palm Beach, there's so many girls, I +2 can't even give you a number of how many. + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. Prior to being introduced to Jeffrey Epstein, +5 what type of student were you? + +6 A. I was a straight-A student. + +7 Q. Were you involved in school activities? + +8 A. Yes, I was a -- I was the captain of the +9 cheerleading squad, I played the trumpet, I was first-year +10 trumpet, and I think that's it. + +11 Q. Which school did you go to? + +12 A. Lake Worth Middle. + +13 Q. Did you ever get to graduate from Lake Worth +14 Middle School? + +15 A. Yes. + +16 Q. And did you go on to high school? + +17 A. No, I -- the summer of eighth to ninth grade is +18 when I met Jeffrey, so I -- after -- that's kind of when I +19 started going down ██████. When I went to ninth grade, I +20 just never went. I went for maybe a week or so, and then +21 I even moved schools to John I. Leonard, and then I just +22 dropped out. + +23 Q. There is some likelihood that this testimony will +24 be presented to the jury by way of the videotape that is +25 being taken of your testimony. I would like you to tell + +1 the ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as best you're able +2 to, how much money Jeffrey Epstein was paying you on an +3 average during this period of time that you were being +4 paid to bring girls to him for purposes of sexual +5 molestation, and during the period of time that you, +6 yourself, were being paid to submit to sexual molestation +7 by Jeffrey. + +8 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +9 THE WITNESS: I was being paid \$200 dollars +10 for every girl. There was a couple girls that looked +11 real young that he would pay me \$300 dollars for to +12 bring, but I would bring him a girl sometimes twice a +13 day. Really once a day -- or some -- others just +14 once, but at least four or five times a week. So I +15 don't know if you do the math on that, you know, two, +16 four, six, eight, that's at least \$800 dollars a week +17 for just one girl for four days, you know? + +18 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +19 Q. What were the economic circumstances of your +20 family during this period of time before Jeffrey Epstein +21 started to pay you those sums of money? + +22 A. I came from a -- a poor family, you know? + +23 Q. Was your mon the sole support for your family -- + +24 A. Yeah -- + +25 Q. -- during that period of time? + +1 A. -- she was a single parent. + 2 Q. And did you have siblings? + 3 A. A brother, but he didn't -- he moved with my -- + 4 my father's parent -- my grandparents on my dad's side, so + 5 it was just me. + 6 Q. Okay. So it was you and your mom -- + 7 A. Un-hmm. + 8 Q. -- and your mom was the sole support of your + 9 household, is that correct? + 10 A. Yes, correct. + 11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 13 Q. Did she the work? + 14 A. She worked as a waitress. + 15 Q. And was your mom experiencing drug problems at + 16 the time when you first became involved with Jeffrey + 17 Epstein? + 18 A. Yes. + 19 Q. Describe the circumstances that led to your being + 20 introduced to Jeffrey Epstein. + 21 A. There -- there was just a couple -- there was an + 22 incident where my mom was switching apartments, and we + 23 were going from one apartment to another, and she was + 24 saving money or doing whatever she was doing, and that's + 25 when I kind of started sleeping over at ██████████ house a + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 would set up a massage table, put towels on it, get -- + 2 MR. SCAROLA: Let me interrupt you there for + 3 just a moment. + 4 THE WITNESS: Okay. + 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 Q. You're speaking of "we." + 7 A. Right. + 8 Q. "We being picked up by a driver, or we taking a + 9 cab there," and Epstein paying for the cab ride. + 10 A. Un-hmm. + 11 Q. Was it generally more than just you alone? + 12 A. Right, it was either me and whoever I was + 13 bringing, or you know when I first went, me and ██████████. + 14 And sometimes he would pay me and ██████████ to go back. Me + 15 and ██████████ went together more than once, you know? + 16 Q. Okay. So I interrupted you in your description + 17 of what went on. There was usually more than one girl + 18 there at a time -- + 19 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + 20 THE WITNESS: Yes. + 21 MR. SCAROLA: What happened? + 22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + 23 THE WITNESS: So we would go upstairs and + 24 we'd set up the massage table, and we would get + 25 undressed and wait for him to walk in, and he would + +1 lot, because my mom was having issues with, you know -- + 2 with her car, and just all types of stuff. So it was more + 3 stable for me to live at ██████████ -- or stay at ██████████ + 4 house a lot. And then when ██████████ did seen, you know, + 5 that my mom was having a hard time, and then taking care + 6 of me on top of, you know, her just trying to survive, pay + 7 her bills and stuff, he allowed me to come stay there with + 8 him. + +9 Q. Did there come a point in time when a routine + 10 developed with regard to what would happen once you got to + 11 Jeffrey Epstein's mansion? + +12 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +13 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Would you describe to the + 15 jurors please what that routine was, what typically + 16 happened? + +17 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +18 THE WITNESS: We would -- we would show up -- + 19 either he would have a driver come get us or we would + 20 take a cab there and he would pay for it. And we + 21 would enter his house and we would up this, like, off + 22 to his kitchen there was a -- like a stairwell. We'd + 23 go up to the stairwell and, like, to his bedroom. + 24 Through his bedroom, we'd go into a bathroom, but it + 25 was, like, you know, as big as this room. And we + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 walk in normally in, like, a robe, and lay on the + 2 massage table. And one girl, you know, would get on + 3 one side of him and I would get on the other and give + 4 him a massage for, like, 30 minutes on each side of + 5 him. And he would take, like, phone -- business + 6 calls -- like phone calls as we do that. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to interrupt you + 8 again -- + +9 THE WITNESS: Okay. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: -- for just a moment. You said + 11 that Jeffrey Epstein entered the room wearing a + 12 robe -- + +13 THE WITNESS: Un-hmm. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: -- and then got on the massage + 15 table? + +16 THE WITNESS: Un-hmm. + +17 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: Did he continue to wear the + 19 robe when he was on the massage table? + +20 THE WITNESS: No, he would take it off and he + 21 wouldn't have any clothes on. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. + +23 THE WITNESS: And we would just put, like, a + 24 towel over his butt while we massaged him. + +25 //// + +1 SY PM. SCAROLA: 2 O. Tell us what happened next. A. And after he was done taking his phone calls and • stuff like that. he would flip over. and if 1 vat bringing 5 • girl. he would ask m• to go downstairs and wait for her. 4 and either he would have the money when he cane in, be would put the money on the counter, or you know, I can't \* that's normally what he would do. And to I'd go t downstairs and wait for the girl to inn done, and I'd wait 10 in the kitchen for her until she cane down. 11 0. Mere there circumstances where you were asked to 12 participate In the aaaaaa activity with Jeffrey aaaaa in 13 before you left the girl that you bad brought with you? 14 NR. GOLDINGUICR: Object to the form. 15 THE WITNESS: Mo. no lllll y he would suet want 16 one person there. I seen, unless if, like, when 17 brought me the first tine, you know, I was the girl 16 who got left in the ran, you know? It MR. SCAROLA: Now any tines. If you can 20 estimate for we, were you the girl who pot left in the 21 rote and were the one who was engaging in lllll 1 21 activity with Jeffrey Epstein? 2) MR. GOLOSEAWR: Object to the form. 24 THE MR. GOLDIERCIER: Object tO th fors. TIM MITMESS: No. + +INC WITNESS: I can't r\*nember how sany MR. SCAROLA: THE M 5 MR. SCARCUA: when there was lllll 6 aaaaaaaa between you and Jeffrey Epstein, whet occurred? 0 MR. COLDBIROW: Object to the torn. THE WITNESS: Me would want ea to Stand next 10 to hits and be would, like, just grab on to ay - • grab 31 on to ny body and touch ay • • ju touch my body, 12 touch me while he jacked off. wanted me to. I) like, rubble nipples and 14 MY MI. SORROW: 15 0. All right. Was • cIrcunatmsce where it pyeu engaged In sexual Jeffrey Epstein? 17 It 0. Wu the aaaaaa co where there was Any If oral sex between Wimpy Epstein? 20 A. 21 Q. Did J fey Epstein ever sake any noeetsry 22 for any future conduct in which he wanted MR. OOLOBSRWR: Object to the form. + +25II e + +na m RECORD REPORTING TALIANASSICIL FLORIO& 050.222.501 Ac TOR 66 RECORD REPORTING TALIANASSEE. MOM 690.222.146 + +\$4 1C + +I BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 O. Apart fron his having -. well, let 3 just a moment. Did Mr. Spst\*in. before you liOn 4 Other girl\* CO hill, offer you nonay f 5 other girls to hint TM. P. Did you knew how were going to get paid? O A. I Can't rest he \fled 200. but 1 lust t knew that f was give law. so 1 think I nade that 10 conclusion, but if ha specified that or 11 12 O. Other Lein your having been paid extra when the IS girls you brought particularly Young. were there any 14 other circumstances under which the permnit that you 15 received varied from the straight 5200 dollars? 16 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. 1? No, there was a couple tines -. 10 like there was • tine that he brought another girl. If Like I went there by myself and he fella as. asked ls• 20 to cons over there. and I vent over there by nymilf 21 and he brought somebody .. I wire rtmembw the girl's 22 tan\* .. into the row, and he paid r extra to, 23 Ilk\* .- to like. have • threaten\*. so to 24 speak, with her. 25 / / / / / for + +140 + +1 IT MR. SCAROLA: 2 O. Do you ever recall aaa top met s girl by the name 1 of aaaaa A. We. 0. .... while you were at Jeffrey Epstsin's home? A. WA. Q. And do you know whether the girl that you are O referring to as having been brought in We row for I threaten\* was named Nadia? 10 A. Yeah. that was her nano. 11 O. And dots the last name Sean anything 12 to you? 11 A. I cannot -- I can't rentsibir her lest am\*. but 14 I'n sore that's it. IS O. Can you describe to us? What did Midis look 16 like? 17 A. Yeah. She wet really pretty. she's blond hair. II she couldn't Speak any English. Like eyes. tall. If skinny. 20 0. When you left the room leaving behind someone 21 whom you had brought -- 22 A. A) O. -- to Jeffrey Rpstein'it house, did you ever have 24 any conversation with those young girls that you brought 25 to Mr. Spatoin's house about what went on when you left + +1 the room? + +2 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +3 THE WITNESS: Yeah, they would -- but a lot +4 of the times I wouldn't want to tell them exactly what +5 would happened, so I would just tell them that, you +6 know, you don't have to get -- "you can leave your bra +7 and panties on, and he just wants to look at your body +8 and he's probably going to jack off." I would tell +9 then that. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: All right. And did you have +11 conversations with any of those girls afterwards about +12 what had actually happened when you left them alone +13 with Jeffrey Epstein? + +14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +15 THE WITNESS: There -- there was a couple +16 times that girls came down and they just looked +17 traumatized, but they -- nobody -- and the one girl, +18 Amy, that I brought to -- another time, she was of +19 age, she said that something transpired between the +20 two of them where she was real mad at him, but she +21 wouldn't tell me what happened either. + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +23 Q. Okay. Was there any session with Jeffrey Epstein +24 in which you were involved that began as a massage that +25 did not progress to sexual touching? + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 A. Yes. + +2 Q. And tell us about that meeting. + +3 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +4 THE WITNESS: She was -- she was his +5 assistant, and she would answer the phone, and any +6 time I would go over there I would -- I would meet +7 her. She was normally at a desk, like, working and +8 stuff like that, but she was always real nice to me; +9 just, like, you know, kind of short. I didn't hang +10 out with her or anything, but I met her almost every +11 time I went there. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Was ██████████ ever present +13 in the room when Jeffrey Epstein was engaging in the +14 sexual molestation of young girls? + +15 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +16 THE WITNESS: No, never with me there, no. + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Was ██████████ position in the house such +19 that young girls entering and leaving the house would +20 generally have to encounter ██████████ in that +21 coming-and-going process? + +22 A. Yes. + +23 Q. Did you cooperate with the federal government in +24 the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein? + +1 A. No. + +2 Q. Apart from the one circumstance that you have +3 described with Nadia, were there any other circumstances +4 where Jeffrey Epstein had you engage in sexual activity +5 with any other person in his presence? + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +7 THE WITNESS: No. + +8 MR. GOLDBERGER: I'll withdraw the objection. + +9 MR. SCAROLA: It's too late now. + +10 Do you know whether there were any other +11 girls besides you who were being paid to bring +12 underage girls to Jeffrey Epstein for purposes of +13 sexual conduct? + +14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +15 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +16 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +17 Q. Who else do you know of? + +18 A. ██████████. This girl Amanda. I can't remember +19 everybody's name right -- + +20 Q. Do you have any idea how many girls ██████████ brought +21 separate and apart from the 20 or 30 that you brought? + +22 A. Yeah, she brought several. She brought way more +23 than I did. + +24 Q. Did you ever meet a woman by the name of Sarah +25 Kellen? + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 Q. And did you hire Brad ██████████ for the purpose of +2 enforcing your legal rights in claims against Jeffrey +3 Epstein? + +4 A. Yes. + +5 Q. Did Jeffrey Epstein ultimately pay to settle your +6 claim for damages against him? + +7 A. Yes. + +8 Q. Could you describe for us your physical +9 appearance when you first started to go to Jeffrey +10 Epstein's Palm Beach mansion? + +11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +12 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I was 14 years old, I had +13 braces on my teeth, and I just looked -- I was just +14 real young. I can't -- don't know how else to +15 describe it. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Apart from submitting to sexual +17 molestation by Jeffrey Epstein, were you providing any +18 other services to Jeffrey Epstein? Did you clean his +19 house, did you press his clothing, anything at all +20 like that? + +21 THE WITNESS: No. + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Object to the form. + +23 THE WITNESS: No. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Are you aware of any of the +25 other minors who were being paid by Jeffrey Epstein + +perforsing any services (or bin other than ilubnitting 2 t0 his sexual melon aaaaaaa 1 Mt. OOLDIEROSI: Object M. the fora. 4 tilt WITNESS: Mo. Mt. SCASOLS. Mad you had any experience in 6 giving siissege• before Jeffrey Epstein began paying 7 you to malinit to the procedures that you have 6 described that began with naesages end led to molestations7 10 MN. OOLOSEXCHIRe Object to the form. 11 THE WITN[SS, 12 MA. SCSPOLA. Had you ever engaged in any I) sale of sexual-related emotes\* before Jeffrey Epstein 14 began paying you to submit to sexual no 000000 lent IS Mi. OOLDIEMOZNi Object to the form. IS THE WITINISS. 17 WY MA. [CAROLS. 16 0. Had you ever had access to the kinds of money It that Jeffrey Epstein began to pay you at any time before 20 Jeffrey Epstein began to pay you? 21 22 MN. SCAROLA. Hey I have just • garment 21 24 MR. Could km just take a quick 25 + +1 SY MR. !CAROLS. 2 O. Tell us about that if you .roved pie . happened? 4 A. it was -- he -- after 5 wee caging him. he whoever walked out of the room. d started. 6 In e. feeling on me. like. h walk so was. like. 7 n his arm area. And he like, jacking off in • his hand. and he ask B1v in oral sex. So when I tatted to try. he t my and told ne that, you 10 know. i was hurt 11 O. Aml only tine that happened, the one 12 11 A. Yeah. 14 O. -- that you can recall? IS A. Yea. 14 O. As you look back on all of the things that we 17 unfortunately have been required to ask you about during 16 the course of this deposition. how do you feel about it? If MR. OOLOSEROER. Object to the fern. 20 THE WITNESS; it makes se just feel -- I lust 21 feel so ashmied of -- I feel ashamml. E fee/ -- really 22 just shams. I can't even -- I can't even really put 22 all ny emotions into words right now how I feel. you 24 know,' 2S MA. SCASOLA. All right, thank you. I don't 4 \*. + +MR. SCAROLS. Yeah. well go off the record for just • moment. VIDEOORAIMEA. The time a approximately 1.22 p.m.. we are off the record. (Whereupon. • (\*Ceps vu had As the deposition./ VZOEOGRAMBR: The tine IS 4PPronimtelY 1,27 p.n. and we're back on the record. 9 SY MA. SCAROLA. 10 O. . you told us that when you first began 11 going to Jeffrey Zpstein.s Palm Smith 0000 that you 12 more still in braces at that time t Correct? 1) A. Yes. 14 NA. OOLDSEROIM 1 t to (he fora, I'm IS sorry. 16 SY MA. °CAROLS. 17 O. You also O0 have no recollection of IS Jeffrey Epstein Y/er Mr(oning Orel sem on you -- 19 A. MM. id them ever come • point in time In had you Perform oral sex on hin and your braces Interfering vith that him? HA. OOLOSKROZO. Object t0 the form. + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLAHASSEE. MAIDS 650.222.5411 + +'S\ + +POP T10: RECORD IMPORTIM3 TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 650.222.5491 + +1 have any further question.. 2 THE WITNESS. Thank you. neuter EXIMIMATIOM 4 SY MR. OOLOSthOtit. 1 0. Tour mother had drug pro blew Won. you had any 6 kind of involvement with Mr. 4 I correct/ 7 Yeah. • Mt. 001.011[Mant Okay, that's all I have. VIDEMMAIMEA: This concludes the deposition 10 of . The time is approximately 11 1:16 p.n. We are off the record. 12 (Whereupon, the witness did not mire reading amd signing Of the deposition and the deposition vas 14 concluded at 1:10 p.m.) 15 16 17 IS Le 20 21 22 23 24 25 + +CERTIFICATE OF OATH + +1 +2 +3 STATE OF FLORIDA +4 COUNTY OF [REDACTED] + +5 +6 I, JEFFREY BABCOCK, the undersigned authority, +7 certify that [REDACTED], personally appeared before me +8 and was duly sworn. + +9 +10 WITNESS my hand and official seal this 13th day +11 of October, 2017. + +11 +12 +13 +14 +15 +16 JEFFREY R. BABCOCK, FPR +17 Notary Public, State of Florida +18 My Commission No. FF206975 +19 Expires: 6/25/2019 + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER + +1 +2 +3 STATE OF FLORIDA +4 COUNTY OF [REDACTED] + +5 +6 I, JEFFREY BABCOCK, do hereby certify that I was +7 authorized to and did stenographically report the +8 deposition of [REDACTED]; that a review of the +9 transcript WAS requested; and that the foregoing +10 transcript, pages 1 through 148, is a true record of my +11 stenographic notes. + +12 +13 I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not a relative, +14 employee, or attorney, or counsel of any of the parties, +15 nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties' +16 attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am I +17 financially interested in the action. + +18 DATED this 13th day of October, 2017 at +19 Tallahassee, [REDACTED] County, Florida. + +20 +21 +22 +23 +24 +25 JEFFREY R. BABCOCK, FPR + +FOR THE RECORD REPORTING TALLANASSEE, FLORIDA 850.222.5491 + +1 +2 ERRATA SHEET + +3 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER CHANGES + +4 IN RE: Corrections to the Video Deposition of COURTNEY +5 [REDACTED], taken in the case of JEFFREY EPSTEIN vs. SCOTT +6 ROTHSTEIN, individually, and [REDACTED] EDWARDS, +7 individually. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXHM on October +8 12, 2017. + +9 Page-Line Correction + +10 +11 +12 +13 +14 +15 +16 +17 +18 Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read +19 the foregoing document and that the facts stated in it are +20 true. +21 DATE +22 CC: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE; [REDACTED], ESQUIRE; JACK +23 GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE; CHESTER [REDACTED], ESQUIRE + +1 JEFFREY EPSTEIN vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +2 [REDACTED], individually + +3 IN RE: VIDEO DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED] TAKEN October +4 12, 2017 +5 DATE SENT TO WITNESS: October 16, 2017 + +6 TO: [REDACTED], Esquire +7 [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos Lehrman +8 425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2 +9 Pt Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268 + +10 +11 The referenced transcript has been completed and +12 awaits reading and signing. +13 Please arrange to stop by our office at 1500 Mahan +14 Drive, Suite 140, Tallahassee, Florida (OR ENTER OTHER +15 ARRANGEMENT, IF ANY) to read and sign the transcript. +16 Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday +17 through Friday. The transcript is 152 pages long, and you +18 should allow yourself sufficient time. +19 If the reading and signing have not been completed +20 prior to November 16, 2017, we shall conclude that you +21 have waived the reading and signing of the transcript. +22 The original of this deposition has been forwarded to +23 the ordering party and your errata, once received, will be +24 forwarded to all ordering parties as listed below. +25 Thank you. + +16 Jeffrey Babcock, Court Reporter + +17 CC: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE; [REDACTED], ESQUIRE; JACK +18 GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE; CHESTER [REDACTED], ESQUIRE + +| -- | (83:1) | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| A | | +| ABBREVIATED (77:11) (98:6) | | +| ABILITY (74:22) (96:25) | | +| ABLE (132:1) | | +| ABSTAINED (54:20) | | +| ABUSE (74:5) (129:22) | | +| ABUSED (62:12) | | +| ABUSING (128:25) | | +| ACCESS (145:18) | | +| ACCURATE (29:22) (97:2) (97:4) | | +| ACID (55:3) (55:9) | | +| ACT (74:8) (74:17) (74:19) (74:25) (75:10) (76:1) (99:12) (115:16) | | +| ACTING (81:22) (115:5) | | +| ACTION (4:15) (74:25) (97:13) (97:14) (97:18) (150:15) (150:16) | | +| ACTIVITIES (131:7) | | +| ACTIVITY (137:12) (137:22) (138:6) (142:4) | | +| ACTUALLY (9:6) (19:25) (21:21) (26:21) (27:25) (43:16) (82:24) (87:16) (89:5) (89:13) (100:7) (102:7) (110:2) (120:12) (125:4) (141:12) | | +| ADDICT (108:21) (108:22) | | +| ADDICTED (108:24) (108:25) | | +| ADDICTS (59:13) | | +| ADDITION (14:10) (52:14) (97:11) (97:19) (123:15) (130:7) | | +| ADDITIONAL (74:18) (74:20) (75:9) (75:25) (76:21) (76:23) (77:14) (96:20) | | +| ADDRESS (7:10) (7:11) | | +| ADJUDICATED (128:15) (128:20) | | +| ADJUDICATES (128:7) | | +| ADJUDICATION (127:24) (127:25) (128:8) (128:16) | | +| ADLER (117:8) (117:16) (120:17) (121:22) | | +| ADMITTING (127:16) | | +| ADULT (52:10) (85:7) (85:18) | | +| ADULTHOOD (54:14) | | +| ADVANTAGE (82:9) | | +| ADVICE (86:23) (90:9) (90:12) | | +| ADVISE (76:18) | | +| ADVISED (88:6) (107:1) | | +| ADVISING (75:3) | | +| AFTER (13:17) (13:20) (14:7) (19:18) (34:7) (47:21) (47:22) (50:22) (67:22) (105:17) (107:11) (125:21) (127:25) (128:8) (128:25) (131:18) (137:3) (147:4) | | +| AFTERWARDS (70:14) (141:11) | | +| AGAIN (53:18) (94:19) (128:5) (136:8) | | +| AGAINST (75:2) (79:13) (115:19) (115:22) (119:13) (121:10) (121:24) (124:5) (124:8) (144:2) (144:6) | | +| AGE (41:7) (50:13) (53:15) (58:17) (64:23) (74:2) (95:20) (104:20) (109:21) (109:22) (110:1) (110:3) (111:6) (111:23) (125:14) (128:22) (129:5) (129:24) (130:3) (130:11) (141:19) | | +| AGENT (64:22) (66:9) (67:22) (68:5) (68:19) (68:24) (69:21) (72:15) (72:16) (80:3) (80:17) (80:25) (81:12) (95:20) | | +| AGENTS (65:22) (66:6) (69:4) (69:12) (70:3) (73:4) (73:5) (73:9) (77:25) (87:4) | | +| AGGRAVATE (26:16) | | +| AGGRAVATED (26:8) (26:10) | | +| AGO (7:21) (35:20) (35:23) (38:6) (38:16) (39:3) (39:21) (40:5) (50:24) (51:2) (51:4) | | +| AGREEMENT (65:1) (65:14) (65:20) (66:22) (69:5) (69:14) (71:23) (72:6) (79:12) (79:18) (80:16) (98:13) (99:11) (100:5) (100:11) | | +| AGWA (2:10) | | +| AHEAD (33:15) (76:24) (104:3) | | +| AIR (72:25) | | +| ALCOHOL (86:13) (86:18) | | +| ALIAS (24:16) (24:17) (25:14) | | +| ALL (14:6) (16:24) (26:20) (28:18) (31:10) (35:7) (35:24) (37:14) (43:11) (51:21) (52:17) (56:10) (57:24) (58:2) (62:5) (67:9) (68:18) (77:9) (81:8) (86:8) (89:13) (97:25) (98:4) (104:16) (106:13) (119:16) (119:18) (120:2) (124:24) (127:23) (134:2) (138:15) (141:10) (144:19) (147:16) (147:23) (147:25) (148:8) (152:14) | | +| ALLEGATION (25:19) | | +| ALLEGEDLY (111:15) (111:17) | | +| ALLOW (75:23) (130:4) (130:11) (130:22) (152:11) | | +| ALLOWED (134:7) | | +| ALMOST (37:14) (51:3) (143:10) | | +| ALONE (135:11) (141:12) | | +| ALREADY (7:19) (70:11) (70:13) (75:11) (82:12) | | +| ALSO (4:14) (5:6) (14:11) (15:15) (34:2) (57:7) (79:20) (80:12) (81:20) (84:18) (93:22) (99:15) (106:22) (108:22) (121:8) (126:11) (127:12) (146:17) | | +| ALTERCATION (23:17) (24:3) | | +| ALWAYS (109:23) (113:1) (143:8) | | +| AMANDA (142:18) | | +| AMENDED (83:22) (83:24) (84:1) (84:7) (84:9) (84:15) | | +| AMENDMENTS (83:19) | | +| AMONG (75:22) | | +| AMOUNT (27:14) (27:18) (36:22) (54:12) | | +| AMPHETAMINES (8:19) (8:23) (8:25) (9:5) | | +| AMY (110:3) (111:12) (141:18) | | +| AND/OR (24:5) (49:17) (55:21) | | +| ANDREWS (2:18) (152:6) | | +| ANNOYING/HARASSING (75:19) | | +| ANOTHER (5:6) (15:15) (74:13) (85:2) (87:17) (113:10) (114:12) (129:18) (133:23) (139:18) (141:18) | | +| ANSWER (12:2) (28:1) (31:4) (31:6) (31:24) (32:8) (32:12) (32:16) (33:6) (33:9) (33:12) (33:17) (36:17) (44:16) (50:23) (57:8) (60:4) (60:7) (62:17) (70:25) (71:15) (74:18) (74:21) (75:4) (75:24) (76:12) (76:19) (77:5) (96:22) (110:16) (111:5) (111:9) (111:19) (119:19) (119:23) (122:8) (122:12) (122:14) (124:10) (124:17) (124:21) (143:5) | | +| ANSWERED (50:2) (50:10) (75:11) (113:14) | | +| ANSWERING (22:10) (109:24) | | +| ANSWERS (51:5) | | +| ANTI-SEMITIC (92:2) (92:9) | | +| ANY (8:10) (10:8) (19:18) (34:8) (37:9) (52:13) (55:20) (56:7) (62:9) (63:20) (66:11) (70:2) (70:5) (70:6) (71:22) (74:3) (74:4) (74:13) (74:18) (75:21) (76:17) (77:14) (77:24) (78:5) (78:23) (80:8) (80:9) (80:19) (86:8) (86:9) (86:11) (86:20) (90:12) (93:12) (93:24) (98:1) (99:5) (99:11) (103:14) (108:18) (112:22) (113:16) (113:21) (114:3) (114:5) (114:8) (114:11) (115:14) (115:16) (116:6) (116:20) (116:23) (116:25) (117:4) (118:5) (118:8) (118:15) (118:18) (119:10) (120:22) (121:14) (122:8) (122:9) (122:11) (122:16) (125:8) (125:15) (128:24) (136:21) (138:18) (138:21) (138:22) (139:13) (140:18) (140:24) (141:11) (141:23) (142:3) (142:5) (142:10) (142:20) (143:5) (144:17) (144:24) (145:1) (145:5) (145:12) (145:19) (148:1) (148:5) (150:13) (150:14) (152:9) | | +| ANYBODY (110:4) (113:1) (118:7) (118:21) (118:24) (118:25) (120:4) (120:15) | | +| ANYONE (8:7) (60:11) (72:4) (80:8) (80:19) (114:17) (115:15) (122:16) | | +| ANYTHING (22:2) (26:12) (26:15) (61:20) (62:21) (67:20) (70:17) (71:3) (72:10) (72:11) (72:14) (73:16) (73:23) (73:24) (86:7) (87:3) (94:22) (113:22) (114:1) (115:2) (119:16) (120:2) (120:6) (123:8) (140:11) (143:10) (144:19) | | +| AOL (2:5) | | +| APART (51:9) (122:21) (130:16) (139:2) (142:2) (142:21) (144:16) | | +| APARTMENT (133:23) | | +| APARTMENTS (133:22) | | +| APHRODER-TEES (52:3) | | +| APHRODITES (48:15) (48:19) (48:23) (52:5) (52:6) | | +| APOLOGIZE (52:6) | | +| APOLOGY (99:19) | | +| APPEARANCE (12:6) (12:7) (144:9) | | +| APPEARANCES (2:1) | | +| APPEARED (149:7) | | +| APPOINTMENTS (113:17) | | +| APPROVAL (64:3) | | +| APPROXIMATELY (4:4) (63:7) (64:14) (64:18) (106:5) (106:9) (123:1) (123:5) (125:25) (146:3) (146:7) (148:10) | | +| APRIL (19:16) (19:19) (37:3) | | +| ARE (4:2) (4:4) (5:17) (8:12) (15:5) (30:6) (30:20) (35:5) (41:9) (41:11) (49:1) (59:13) (59:18) (60:18) (62:9) (63:18) (64:4) (64:15) (75:3) (75:11) (75:15) (75:18) (76:17) (76:18) (76:21) (77:10) (77:18) (83:11) (83:21) (84:17) (84:23) (87:1) (88:18) (88:21) (89:3) (89:11) (93:24) (97:6) (97:18) (97:20) (98:22) (99:19) (100:3) (100:10) (119:18) (123:2) (123:6) (130:9) (140:7) (144:24) (146:4) (148:11) (151:19) (152:10) | | + +| AREA | (147:7) | (134:1) | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| AREAS | (82:19) | BEDROOM | (134:23) (134:24) | +| AREN'T | (51:5) (90:25) | BEEN | (4:22) (5:19) (8:7) (11:20) (17:18) (17:24) (18:15) | +| ARGUMENTATIVE | (31:19) | (21:3) (21:7) (21:10) (22:5) (22:11) (26:3) (26:5) (26:20) | | +| ARM | (37:15) (39:22) (147:7) | (26:24) (27:1) (27:8) (27:15) (29:17) (30:25) (31:5) (31:13) | | +| ARMED | (6:5) | (31:16) (32:8) (33:3) (33:10) (33:17) (34:22) (34:23) (35:14) | | +| AROUND | (47:10) (47:13) (57:2) (57:13) (58:5) (63:21) | (42:4) (49:3) (51:6) (53:14) (54:8) (54:14) (54:15) (57:21) | | +| ARRANGE | (152:8) | (58:2) (58:20) (59:14) (59:15) (60:20) (60:23) (67:1) (70:14) | | +| ARRANGEMENT | (152:9) | (75:11) (82:11) (88:19) (92:12) (92:13) (92:18) (103:12) | | +| ARREST | (19:14) (19:19) (20:8) (23:5) | (105:4) (108:23) (118:12) (118:23) (122:6) (123:9) (127:20) | | +| ARRESTED | (16:21) (24:12) (24:19) (25:4) (25:5) (26:4) | (129:4) (129:7) (129:9) (130:2) (139:12) (140:8) (147:17) | | +| (26:7) (26:9) (26:20) (27:1) (27:4) (48:22) (49:7) | (152:7) (152:11) (152:13) | | | +| ASHAMED | (147:21) | BEENA | (2:23) (4:7) | +| ASIDE | (12:23) (46:17) (100:12) | BEFORE | (1:17) (22:16) (26:21) (35:9) (35:10) (35:15) | +| ASK | (26:16) (30:24) (32:20) (32:21) (33:8) (51:14) (59:23) | (46:20) (47:20) (49:23) (52:12) (52:23) (65:20) (67:22) | | +| (74:20) (74:24) (76:24) (78:4) (80:7) (94:22) (97:1) (113:5) | (71:4) (77:20) (77:22) (85:4) (85:14) (85:20) (85:23) (86:2) | | | +| (113:10) (113:12) (137:5) (147:17) | (105:24) (122:21) (124:9) (125:16) (129:13) (129:18) | | | +| ASKED | (7:19) (22:5) (22:14) (32:25) (75:11) (113:1) (121:8) | (129:23) (130:3) (132:20) (137:13) (139:3) (145:6) (145:13) | | +| (121:23) (122:4) (137:11) (139:19) (147:8) | (145:19) (148:5) (149:7) | | | +| ASKING | (28:15) (30:11) (67:8) (80:17) (80:18) (81:7) | BEGAN | (49:20) (125:15) (125:21) (126:22) (128:25) (129:13) | +| (90:10) (122:20) (123:8) | (129:19) (129:23) (130:3) (139:3) (141:24) (145:6) (145:8) | | | +| ASSESSMENT | (97:5) | (145:14) (145:19) (145:20) (146:10) | | +| ASSIST | (17:16) | BEGINNING | (4:9) (32:5) | +| ASSISTANT | (70:6) (81:1) (81:11) (143:5) | BEHALF | (1:13) (2:2) (2:11) (2:16) (4:13) (4:16) (4:18) | +| ASSOCIATED | (114:18) | (82:25) (83:15) (83:17) (84:14) (84:15) (122:6) (124:7) | | +| ASSUME | (127:17) | BEHIND | (140:20) | +| ASSUMES | (95:22) | BEING | (21:14) (26:7) (27:3) (46:18) (54:11) (67:12) (67:18) | +| ATTEMPTING | (100:3) (100:10) (113:22) | (70:16) (72:17) (73:7) (73:16) (74:1) (74:14) (80:2) (80:24) | | +| ATTENTION | (87:15) (90:3) | (95:2) (97:12) (100:16) (102:15) (105:13) (107:1) (119:7) | | +| ATTERBURY | (2:7) | (122:17) (130:10) (130:19) (131:4) (131:25) (132:3) (132:6) | | +| ATTORNEY | (11:9) (11:10) (21:17) (44:1) (77:16) (81:1) | (132:9) (133:19) (135:8) (142:11) (144:25) | | +| (81:11) (81:21) (81:22) (82:3) (82:7) (82:10) (82:12) | | | | +| (123:25) (150:13) (150:15) | BEING ASKED | (111:3) | | +| ATTORNEY/CLIENT | (72:2) (119:15) (121:12) (123:16) (124:18) | BELIEVE | (6:22) (26:9) (27:2) (27:24) (29:4) (34:3) (34:18) | +| ATTORNEYS | (70:5) (70:6) | (39:23) (41:6) (48:21) (49:18) (49:21) (56:25) (58:12) | | +| ATTORNEY'S | (72:5) | (58:16) (75:22) (81:17) (82:5) (93:23) (96:17) (100:19) | | +| AUDITION | (47:1) (47:8) | (104:1) (106:13) (111:18) (128:19) | | +| AUDITIONED | (47:24) | BELLS | (66:11) | +| AUDITIONING | (47:5) (47:13) | BELOW | (152:14) | +| AUGUST | (80:3) (80:14) (87:5) (87:11) (95:19) | BENEFIT | (52:17) | +| AUSTRALIAN | (2:3) (2:7) | BESIDES | (46:21) (54:11) (58:25) (59:4) (60:19) (110:4) | +| AUTHORITY | (149:6) | (142:11) | | +| AUTHORIZE | (123:13) (124:4) | BEST | (36:18) (51:11) (51:12) (65:9) (132:1) | +| AUTHORIZED | (123:20) (150:7) | BETTER | (51:13) (51:18) (84:11) | +| AUTO | (34:2) | BETWEEN | (37:4) (80:13) (95:2) (124:13) (127:14) (127:24) | +| AVENUE | (2:3) (2:7) (2:18) (152:6) | (138:6) (138:19) (141:19) | | +| AVERAGE | (132:3) | BEYOND | (75:10) | +| AVOID | (78:1) | BIG | (63:6) (134:25) | +| AWAITS | (152:8) | BILLS | (134:7) | +| AWARE | (84:17) (130:9) (144:24) | BIRTHDAY | (46:20) (49:24) | +| AWAY | (66:25) | BIT | (100:22) | +| | | BJGM | (37:24) | +| | | BLACKED | (51:7) | +| | | BLAME | (58:10) (100:16) | +| | | BLOCKED | (51:7) | +| | | BLOND | (140:17) | +| | | BOB | (39:6) (39:13) | +| | | BOBBY | (101:17) | +| | | BODY | (138:11) (141:7) | +| | | BOND | (16:21) (16:24) (17:1) (17:3) (17:4) | +| | | BOOKED | (9:7) (12:5) (14:4) (14:5) (14:6) | +| | | BORN | (8:5) (40:8) (57:22) | +| | | BOTH | (4:14) (73:20) (76:13) (76:14) (76:15) (83:25) (88:9) | +| | | BOTTOM | (90:23) | +| | | BOTTOMS | (53:3) | +| | | BOULEVARD | (2:13) | +| | | BOY | (101:11) (101:17) | +| | | BOYFRIEND | (62:3) (62:25) | +| | | BOYNTON | (48:4) | +| | | BRA | (141:6) | +| | | BRACES | (144:13) (146:12) (146:22) | +| | | BRAD | (2:21) (83:17) (110:13) (118:2) (118:3) (118:4) | +| | | (119:13) (119:15) (119:18) (122:9) (144:1) | | +| | | (81:2) (81:13) | | +| | | (1:8) (2:11) (2:17) (4:13) (151:4) (151:21) (152:1) | | +| | | (152:5) (152:17) | | +| | | BREAK | (63:20) (64:1) (64:10) (68:2) (106:1) (112:1) (145:25) | +| | | BRENT | (5:16) (7:12) | +| | | B-R-E-N-T | (5:16) | + +[REDACTED] (2:3) (4:18) (30:16) (30:18) (43:25) (110:23) + (151:22) (152:18) +**BRING** (18:4) (103:15) (113:2) (116:1) (126:3) (126:18) + (130:8) (132:4) (132:12) (142:11) +**BRINGING** (59:11) (109:9) (110:4) (111:24) (114:12) (116:5) + (126:15) (135:13) (137:4) (139:3) (139:4) +**BROTHER** (133:3) +**BROUGHT** (23:4) (59:15) (60:21) (67:1) (93:2) (109:25) + (116:8) (116:9) (126:7) (126:9) (127:2) (130:17) (137:13) + (137:17) (139:13) (139:18) (139:21) (140:8) (140:21) + (140:24) (141:18) (142:20) (142:21) (142:22) +**BROWARD** (118:13) +**BUNCH** (71:9) (86:4) +**BURDENING** (97:23) +**BURGLARIZE** (112:2) (112:4) +**BURGLARIZING** (112:7) +**BUSINESS** (136:5) +**BUT** (4:23) (7:20) (9:7) (9:9) (9:17) (11:16) (14:7) (23:3) + (23:14) (24:10) (24:19) (26:16) (29:13) (31:15) (33:7) + (34:22) (35:14) (36:7) (40:15) (41:5) (41:13) (41:17) (42:5) + (44:22) (47:1) (47:4) (47:18) (50:1) (52:12) (59:8) (60:23) + (61:23) (63:5) (64:9) (66:23) (66:25) (68:18) (69:25) (70:11) + (70:21) (73:15) (74:21) (82:7) (84:7) (85:13) (85:14) (86:5) + (88:4) (88:11) (88:23) (89:13) (100:18) (101:14) (101:15) + (102:23) (104:17) (105:4) (105:9) (106:22) (107:22) (108:6) + (108:23) (110:4) (111:12) (116:14) (117:14) (118:23) (121:9) + (132:12) (132:14) (133:3) (134:24) (139:8) (139:10) (140:13) + (141:3) (141:17) (141:20) (143:8) (143:10) +**BUTT** (136:24) + +**C** + +**C/O** (152:5) +**CAB** (134:20) (135:9) +**CALCULATED** (75:12) (97:7) +**CALL** (72:1) (78:10) (78:22) (79:7) (87:15) (90:3) (108:10) + (112:20) (113:3) (113:13) +**CALLED** (4:22) (17:20) (41:15) (44:20) (92:4) (112:25) + (113:15) (120:12) (139:19) +**CALLS** (16:5) (99:15) (112:23) (113:16) (113:21) (136:6) + (137:3) +**CAME** (24:19) (25:5) (35:11) (65:22) (66:4) (66:6) (66:15) + (67:17) (72:24) (73:20) (132:22) (137:6) (137:10) (141:16) +**CAN** (5:10) (10:8) (25:20) (30:10) (31:25) (33:6) (33:7) + (33:11) (33:13) (33:15) (33:23) (36:18) (43:11) (43:16) + (43:18) (43:24) (57:8) (60:4) (60:7) (70:25) (76:1) (76:10) + (84:2) (84:10) (84:11) (87:9) (88:17) (89:2) (90:20) (94:1) + (98:16) (104:3) (122:12) (122:24) (130:15) (137:19) (140:15) + (141:6) (147:14) +**CANCELED** (116:2) +**CANNOT** (140:13) +**CAN'T** (7:11) (16:18) (16:20) (24:23) (27:5) (29:3) (29:10) + (29:24) (34:14) (35:2) (46:8) (46:14) (47:19) (47:25) (48:6) + (49:4) (49:11) (50:6) (51:4) (51:10) (51:17) (51:18) (52:11) + (61:20) (62:11) (65:5) (65:10) (66:23) (69:23) (70:11) (71:9) + (71:17) (75:20) (80:4) (81:19) (82:7) (87:2) (90:13) (92:10) + (92:12) (95:12) (101:8) (101:15) (101:16) (102:18) (102:22) + (103:22) (105:2) (105:22) (107:3) (108:6) (112:19) (113:9) + (117:13) (118:7) (119:3) (121:1) (128:12) (131:2) (137:7) + (138:1) (139:8) (139:10) (139:21) (140:13) (142:18) (144:14) + (147:22) +**CANT'** (108:1) +**CANTEEN** (104:4) +**CAPACITY** (4:14) +**CAPTAIN** (131:8) +**CAR** (134:2) +**CARD** (85:7) (85:18) (85:20) (85:22) (85:24) +**CARE** (44:5) (134:5) +**CARRIED** (10:12) +**CASE** (1:4) (7:23) (11:1) (11:14) (11:20) (19:20) (22:17) + (22:19) (22:24) (25:23) (26:11) (26:17) (66:2) (67:20) + (72:10) (74:9) (74:13) (74:17) (74:19) (75:10) (76:1) (77:19) + (84:25) (93:3) (93:10) (93:13) (93:22) (93:24) (98:9) (99:6) + (99:10) (99:12) (99:21) (110:6) (117:1) (121:6) (121:9) + (123:11) (123:15) (124:7) (127:17) (151:3) (151:4) +**CASES** (17:6) (26:1) (26:3) (29:5) (70:7) +**CASSEL** (92:21) (92:23) (92:25) +**CAST** (18:24) +**CAUSE** (74:25) (120:19) (120:21) + +**CAUSED** (58:23) (61:2) (61:7) (61:17) (62:10) (63:6) (63:13) +**CAUSING** (100:4) (100:11) +**CRLL** (2:9) (2:14) (2:20) +**CERTAIN** (33:18) (88:21) +**CERTAINLY** (29:13) +**CERTIFICATE** (3:10) (149:1) (150:1) +**CERTIFY** (149:7) (150:6) (150:12) +**CHANGE** (18:23) +**CHANGES** (151:2) +**CHARGE** (12:5) (12:20) (13:5) (15:15) (36:6) (67:12) (73:22) + (128:9) +**CHARGED** (14:6) (15:16) (20:10) (29:9) (66:3) (67:12) + (67:18) (67:19) +**CHARGES** (12:15) (14:5) (14:6) (27:24) (34:10) (65:25) + (66:23) (73:11) (73:15) (80:9) (80:20) (127:19) +**CHARGING** (67:15) +**CHERLEADING** (131:9) +**CHERTAH** (48:18) (52:7) (52:8) (52:9) (52:12) +**CHESTER** (2:3) (4:18) (151:22) (152:18) +**CHILD** (7:25) (8:5) +**CHILDHOOD** (54:13) +**CHILD'S** (8:6) +**CHOICE** (45:8) (104:14) (104:15) (115:9) (115:11) (116:12) +**CHOICES** (100:18) +**CIGARETTE** (48:25) (49:7) +**CIRCUIT** (1:1) (1:2) (1:3) +**CIRCUMSTANCE** (138:15) (138:18) (142:2) +**CIRCUMSTANCES** (128:17) (132:19) (133:19) (137:11) + (139:14) (142:3) +**CIVIL** (1:3) (99:11) (99:12) +**CLAIM** (75:2) (144:6) +**CLAIMED** (103:24) +**CLAIMS** (122:2) (144:2) +**CLEAN** (106:23) (144:18) +**CLIENT** (75:2) (75:4) (75:5) (76:12) (76:19) (83:12) (83:17) +**CLOSE** (35:23) (61:22) (94:5) (94:24) (95:10) +**CLOTHES** (47:14) (47:15) (47:18) (104:17) (116:12) (116:14) + (136:21) +**CLOTHING** (144:19) +**CLUB** (23:20) (23:21) (23:22) (25:8) (35:11) (44:20) (52:4) + (86:4) +**CLUBS** (48:1) (48:13) (52:13) (85:4) +**CO-AGENT** (80:17) +**COCAINE** (26:21) (26:24) (27:1) (27:4) (55:1) (55:4) +**COERCE** (115:15) +**COLLECT** (69:6) +**COM** (2:5) (2:10) (2:15) (2:21) +**COME** (67:1) (84:24) (85:3) (113:5) (113:13) (116:2) (134:7) + (134:9) (134:19) (139:20) (146:20) +**COMPORTABLE** (58:19) (59:21) (64:10) +**COMING** (104:11) +**COMING-AND-GOING** (143:21) +**COMMISSION** (149:18) +**COMMITTED** (61:23) (62:3) (100:15) +**COMMOTION** (63:6) +**COMMUNICATED** (119:14) +**COMMUNICATION** (123:24) (124:12) +**COMMUNICATIONS** (72:2) (119:18) +**COMPETENCE** (120:22) +**COMPLAINED** (146:22) +**COMPLAINT** (82:24) (83:1) (83:5) (83:12) (83:14) (83:16) + (83:18) (83:22) (83:24) (84:1) (84:2) (84:7) (84:9) +**COMPLAINTS** (84:1) (84:15) +**COMPLETE** (88:3) +**COMPLETED** (152:7) (152:11) +**COMPLETELY** (116:14) +**COMPOUND** (13:24) (18:7) (18:8) (26:22) (36:3) (57:7) (61:4) + (80:23) +**CONCERNED** (88:4) +**CONCERNING** (23:6) (41:21) (88:5) (95:18) (98:1) (98:2) + (103:20) (122:17) +**CONCESSIONS** (69:5) (69:14) +**CONCLUDE** (152:12) +**CONCLUDED** (148:14) +**CONCLUDES** (148:9) +**CONCLUSION** (16:6) (99:15) (139:10) +**CONDITIONS** (18:13) +**CONDUCT** (112:23) (138:22) (142:13) + +| CONFER | (80:7)80:19) | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| CONFUSED | (67:13) | +| CONNECTED | (150:15) | +| CONSIDER | (76:1)(101:231 | +| CONSIDERING | (65:24)(66:21) | +| CONSISTING | (91:8) | +| CONSULT | (19:18) (77:15) (96:25) (97:15) | +| CONTACTED | (80:16) | +| CONTAINING | (25:20) | +| CONTEST | (127:14) (127:15) (128:1) (128:9) | +| CONTESTED | (13:4) | +| CONTEXT | (31:11) | +| CONTINUE | (32:18) (32:22) (33:23)1102:1) (125:20)1136:18) | +| CONTRACT | (93:17) | +| CONTROLLED | (88:7)(90:10) | +| CONVERSATION | (114:6) (114:8) (114:12) (118:25) (121:14) | +| CONVERSATIONS | (121 :20) (141:11) | +| CONVICTED | (6:2116:22)16:24)17:5) (7:12)18:151 (8:18) | +| COI/VICTIM | (23:5) | +| CONVICTIONS | (15:10) (20:19) (22:6) (22:14) (28:12) | +| COOPERATE | (143:23) | +| COPY | (30:14) (87:13) (87:17) (91:6) (110:19) (110:22) | +| CM | (41:6) | +| CiOTOUILIUS | (23:7) (23:9) (24:3) (25:4) (25:19) (26:18) | +| CORNER | (90:23) (91:10) | +| CORRECT | (6:13) (7:18)17:24) (0:3) (9:9) (9:10) (9:18) | +| (13:14) (14:13)(14:15) | 114:18) (15:12) (15:22)117:5) | +| (19:11) (19:12) (22:17) | 125:10) (25:16) (25:17)125:20) | +| (39:15) (46:3) (46:23) (47:12) (53:22) (53:23) (54:6) (54:7) | Al | +| CORRECTED | (40:15) | +| CORRECTION | (151:6) | +| CORRECTIONAL | (1:15) (4:5) (6:25) (17:18) (17 | +| co:max= | (15:10 (151:3) | +| COULD | (3.a:23.) (ii13.3)(11:15)(3.3.:3.6) (3. 14:4) | +| (19:4) (19:10) (34:22) (49:3) (70:18) (78: | 2 (81:16) | +| (84:1) (99:12) (104:15) (104:17) (112:8) | :151(118:23) | +| COULDN'T | (140:18) | +| COUNSEL | (2:1) (4:8) (4:13) (4:15) | +| 176:6) | 197:13) (97:14) (150:13) (150 5) | +| COUNSELED | (87:6) | +| COUNSELOR | (70:21) | +| COUNTER | (126:20) (137: | +| COUNTS | (73 : 18) | +| COUNTY | (1:2) (7:13 12:17)128:2) (28:3) (28:13) | +| (67:11) ((5:15) ( | 13) (149:() (150:4) (150:19) | +| COUPLE | (39:21) (4 .22) (47:2) (48:1)169:23) (86:2) | +| 0.07:8) (111- | 5) (116:3) (128:19) (132:10) (133:21) | +| COURSE | (119:14) 7:18) | +| COURT | (1:1) (4:8 (4:10) (75:1) (77:20) (77:22) (70:1) | +| COURT-APPOINTED | 11117) | +| courant: | (1:11)13:2) (4:6)(4:21) IS: 51 (5:7) (24:15) | +| MEE | (51:14) | +| CUTS | (15:25) (16:1) (20:24) (21:4) (21:7) (21:11)122:11) | +| 174:18) (74:24) | 175:10) (130:3) | +| CRIMES | (29:17) (33:16) (34:8) (75:25) (100:14) | +| ataann. | (20:22) (80:9) (80:20) (117:1) (126:23) (128:9) | +| CROSS | (3:3)136:23)(125:1) | +| CURVES | (41:16) (41:17)(41:19) (41:221 (42:2) (42:4) (42:5) | + +| CUSTODY | (7:22)(93:2) | +|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| CUSTOMER | (50:1) | +| CUT | (33:3) | +| CUR | (84:21)199:20) | +| CVRA | 184:25) 193:3)19329/ (93:22) (93:24) (96:21) (97:13) | +| DAD | (61:12) (61:14) (61:15) (62:14)1134:4/ | +| DAD'S | (133:4) | +| DAMAGES | (69:6) (69:15) (79:13) (121:7) (121:10) (123:14) | +| DANCE | (48:5) (52:18) (52:19) (53:1) (85:13) (86:3) | +| DANCED | (43:01 (48:7) (50:13) | +| DANCER | (41:4) (41:5) (41:6) (41:7)(41 X10)141:13)(49:9) | +| DANCES | (52:15) (53:12) | +| DANCING | (85:20) (05:22) (85 :2) | +| DARK | (72:9) | +| DATE | (1:14) (18:20) (19: 4:10) (151:20)1152:3) | +| DATED | (87:11) (150:18) | +| DATES | (48:6) (80:5) 7 | +| DATING | (101:11) | +| DAY | (52:11) (67:25 3) (149:10) (150:18) | +| DAYS | (132:1 | +| DEANNA | (2 lei 9)(24:3)(25:4) | +| DECI{6I0 | :9) (80:20) | +| DEFENDANTS/C01111110t-PLATTIFFS | (1:9) | +| DEFENDER | (29:6) | +| DEFENSE | (127:2) (128:17) | +| DEFINITE | (73:1) | +| DEFINITELY | (47:22) | +| DELRAY | (7:9) | +| DENNEY | (2:12) | +| DENY | 146:22) (68:5)179:6) | +| DEPARTMENT | (15:17) (81:2) (81:13) | +| DEPENDS | (76:20) | +| DEPONENT | (2:16) | +| DEPOSED | (21:14) (29:16)174:15) (97:12) | +| DEPOSITION | (1:11) (4:6) (21:25) (22:3) (22:6) (27:12) | +| (148:13) moan | 1151:3)1152:2) (152:13) | +| DESCRIES | (133:19)1134:14) (140:15) (144:8) (144:15) | +| DESCRIBED | (128:18) (142:3) (145:8) | +| DESCRIPTION | (3:7) (135:16) | +| DESK | (143:7) | +| DETERMINE | (76:10) | +| DEVELOPED | (134:10) | +| DID | (9:21) (10:2) (10:3) (10:13) (11:5) (11:6) (11:7)111:81 | + +| | (112:25) (113:3) (113:8) (113:10) (113:21) (113:25) (114:3) (114 :5) (114:8) (114:11) (114:17/ (114:20) (114:22) (115:18) (115:21) (115:24) (116:23) (116:25)1117:4)(117:11) (117;25)(118:5) (118:8) (118:12) (118:15) (118:18) (119:5) (120:6) (120:10) (120:15) (120:18) (120:21) (120:24) (121:7) (121:22) (123:10) (123:13) (124:4) (125:3) (125;20) (126:3) (131:11) (131:13) (131 :16) (133:2) (133:13) (134:9)1136:18) (138:21) (139:3) (139:7)1140:15) (140:23) (141:10) (141:25) (142:23) (142:24) (143:23) (144:1) (144:5) (144:18) (144:19) (146:20) (148112) (150:7) | +|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DIDN'T | (23:11) (36:4) (36:10) 136:14) (57:20) (65:2S) (66:1) (67:10) (67:15) (67:19) (70:13) (72:9) (72:14) (73:15) (73:19) (73:21) (73:23) (74:3) (85:14) (103:14) (104:17) (105:2) (105:4) (105:17) (109:17) (112:3) (114:25)1116:14) (118:21) (118:24) (120:4) (133:3) (143:9) | +| DI MAN= | (9S:1) (127:13) (127:24) (128:12) (128:13) | +| DIFFERRET | (28:21) (39:18) (49:4) (49:6) (76:8) (87:17) (88:3) (117:14) | +| DIPVENNITTIE | (41;21) (50:3) (50 I 10) (71:16) (109:25) | +| DIRECT | (3:3) (5:1)179:7) (87:12) (94:9) | +| DIRECT-DIAL | (78:18) | +| DISCOVERY | (77:19) (89:6) (97:8) | +| DISCUSS | (78:23) (79:17) (120:15) | +| DISCUSSED | (98:25) (99:4) (127:1) | +| DISCUSSION | (69:3) (106:15) (109:3) (112:22) (113:19) | +| (126.21) | 1127:12) | +| DISCUSSIONS | (103:20)(103:22) | +| DISHONEST | (16:8)(16:14) | +| DISHONESTY | (15:25)(16:1) | +| DISPOSED | (127;13) 1127;19) (127:20) | +| DISTINCTION | (128:7) | +| DIVINE | (38:10) (38:11) (38:12) (49:12) (49:17) | +| DIVISION | (1:3) | +| DIVORCED | (61:15) | +| Damian | (88:1) (88:4) (\$8:7) (88:10) (88:15) (88:17) (89:1) (90:15) (91:8) (94:1) (95:23) (151:19) | +| maven= | (20:6) | +| DOES | (6:18) (9:13) (10:18) (23:4) (29:21) (37:23) (37:25( (38:10) (42:13) (45:13) (65:4) (66:11) (94:12) (96:24) (102:1) (111;9) (140:11) | +| DOESN'T | (73:22) (77:15) (94:22) | +| DOING | (54:9) (55:11) (56:10)156:13)156:17) (5 4) | +| (57:24) (58:5) (59:1) (68:10) (68:14) (68:20) | : ) | +| DOLLARS 1139:15) | (17:4) (126:6)1132:9)1132:11)113 : 13 ) | +| DOW | (52:23) (53:7) (54:23) (54:24) (55: (67:9 1:2) | +| 175:20) (82:18)182;19) (137:3) (137:9)(1 | 4) | +| DON'T | (12:2) (13:10) (16:23) (20:12) (20:1 :2) (21:5) | +| (22:9) (22:10) (23:10)123:13) (26: | (27:2) (27:10)129:11) | +| (30:6) (30:10) (30:15) (32:24) (35:1 | 6) (42:19) (44:5) (44:24) (47:1) (47:3) (47:15) 47:25) 48.. 1) (51:4) (51:15) | +| (56:25) (58:15) (59:2) (59:3 | 9:21) :22) (60:12) (60:24) | +| (63:16) (64:24)168:8) (68 | (69:2) 69:10) (69:17) (69:19) | +| (70:12) (71:2) (73:7) (74: 3) | :24) (81:25) (870) (87:10) | +| (89:24) (90:1) (91:19 | 2) ( :8) (93:14) (93:23) (94:6) | +| (96:10) (96:17) (101 | :12) (104:1) (105:2)1105:3) | +| (105:5) (105:9) ( | :8) (107:12) (108:1) (108:10) | +| (108:20) (110:4) (1 | 19:23) (120:13)1121:5) (132:15) | +| (141:6)(144: | 5) | +| DOOR | (118:20) | +| DOUBT | (120:21) ( 15) (125:18) (128:24) | +| DOVE | (11:18) (131:191 (137:10) (141:16) | +| DOIONTAIRS | (137:5)(137:9) | +| NAINNAID | (58:21) | +| DEWS | (52:25) | +| DRINK | 186:16)(86:18) | +| DRIWZIR) | (45:9) (45:12) (46:11) (46:12) (46:13) (46:16) (54:5) (56:13) (56:19)157:16) | +| DRIVE | (1:19)(152:9) | +| DRIVER | (134:19) (135:8) | +| DROPPED | (131:22) | +| DROVE | (112:17) | +| DRUG | (8:21) (12:16) (14:3) (40:22) (45:8) (54:15) (58:25) (59:13) (108:21) (108:22) (139:22) (133:15) (148:5) | +| DRUGS | (9:14) (9:15) (9:17) (10:5) (12:19)112:21) (14:11) (19:15) (35:24) (35:25) (36:1) (36:5) (36:7) (36:8) 140:6) (40:10) (40:19) (40:21) (41:11 (41:3)141;5) (45:4)(46:9) (53:17) (53:20) (54:9) (54:23) (54:24) (55:11) (55:21) (56:7) | + +| | (56:10) (56:24) 157:1) (57:2) (57:12) (57:15) (58:24) (59:1) (61:2) (61:8) (61:17) (62:10) (63:13)168:10) (68:15) (68:17) (68:20)186:9) (86:11) (86:20) (86:24) (87:6)(90:6) (90:7) (90:12) (108:24) (108:25) (128:21) (128:25) | +|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DUE | (100:19) | +| DOLT | (4:22) (149:8) | +| DORM | (54:9)154:13) (54:22) (54:23) (55:21) (56:9) (56:14) (68:1) (68:18) (70:6) (90:6) (90:7)1105:21) (107:18) (110:14) (112:23) (113:21) (116:20) (119:14) (132:3) (132:5) (132:20) (132:25) (147:17) | +| RAC. | (128:17)1136:4) | +| EARLY | (61:2) | +| EASIER | (69:6)169:15) (79:12) | +| EATING | (45:9) (45:12) (45:13) (46:2 | +| WOKE= | (132:19) | +| WOW | (5 (132:16) | +| EDWARD ' MEW | :1 1:24) (17:16) (1:8) (2:11) (2:17) (2: (19:18) (21:17) (36:11) (43:10 3)14 :23) (44:2) ) (82:17) (92225) (83:15) (54:16) (57:6)161:4) (82:10) 82. (83:17) (84:3)184:14)187- 2:14) (93:19) (98:16) (104 s4) (110:13) (116:17) 17:8)1117:21) (118:3) (118:4) (118:15) (118. 120:3) (120:11) (120:18) (120:19) (121:3) (12 (121:17) (121:21) (121:22) (122:9) (123:16) (12 3:24)1124:3)1124:7) (124:9) (124:12) (124:15) (14 5:24)(151:4)(151:21)1152:1) (152:5)1152: 2:14) (33:16) (47:23) (52:2) (I30:16) 13:4) (114:17) (121:2)1134:19) (135:12) 1) | +| A | (104:23) (105:7)1105:20) | +| EJACULATED | (105:11) (105:15) (106:23) | +| EJACULATING | (106:16) | +| ELECTED | (82:9) | +| ELEPHANT | (39:23) | +| ELIZABETH | (5:5) (5:7) | +| ELSE | 18:7) (33:21) (48:17) (59:20) (60:11) 163.:19) (61:20) (63:5) (65:25) (71:3) (110:4) (111:13)1118:7) (118:21) (118:25) (120:4) (120:15) (142:17) (144:14) | +| EMAIL | (2:5) (2:10)12:15)12:21) (114:3) (114:11) (114:18) | +| MILS | (122:16) | +| EMOTIONS | (147:23) | +| EMPLOYED | (114:17) | +| EMPLOYEE | (150:13) (150:14) | +| ENCOUNTER | (143:20) | +| ENDED | (116:2) | +| ENFORCING | (144:2) | +| ENGAGE | (113:23) (115:16) (138:23) (142:4) | +| ENGAGED | (138:16) (145:12) | +| ENGAGEMENT | (93:12) | +| ENGAGING | (137:21) (143:13) | +| ENGLISH | (140:18) | +| ENOUGH | (77:21) (90:14) | +| ENTER | (13; 17) (112:5) (134:21) (151:21 (152:9) | +| ENTERED | (9:21) (12:13) (28:2S) (29:2) (29:13) (34:4) (34:8) (112 :13) (136:11) | +| ENTERING | (70:3) (71:21) (73:10) (78:6)1143:19) | +| ENTERTAIN'S/FT | (85:7) (85:18) | +| ENTICE | (113:23) | +| ENTIRE | (31.24)133:6)133:7) (54:13) (90:5) | +| ENTIRELY | (40:22) (76:2) | +| ENTIRETY | (88:10) | +| ENTITLED | (119:19) | +| EPSTEIN | (1:5) (4:17) (4:19)135:8) (37:5) (40:23)147:20/ (58:11) (59:10) (66:22) (67:4) (68:7) (69:1) (70:3) (71:21) (71:22) (72:17) (73:5)173:9) (73:10) (75:2) (77:25) (78:6) (79:13) (79:18) (80:10)180:15) (\$2:4) (86:16) (86:23) (87:6) (88:6) (89119)189:20) (90:8) (90:9) (90:11) (91:14) (91:18) (91:20) (92:6) (93:15) (94:2) (94:5) (95:11) (95:14) (95:20) (96:3) (96:13) (100:4) (100:11) (103:18) (103:21) (103:25) (104:23) (105:7) (105:13) (105:20) (106:15)1106:23)1107:2) | +| (107:11) | 1109:1) (109:7) (112:20) (113:4) (113;5) (113:11) (113:21)1114:3) (114:6) (114:9) (114:11) (114:17) (114:18) (114:20)1114:22)1115:18) (115:21) (115:24) (119:6) (119:7) (119:13) (121:7) (121:11) (121:24) (123:15) (124:6) (124:8) | + +| (152:1) | (125:3) (125:5) (125:9) (125:11) (125:15) (128:25) (129:5) (129:8) (129:13) (129:18) (129:23) (130:3) (130:10) (130:11) (130:20) (130:22) (131:4) (132:2) (132:20) (133:17) (133:20) (135:9) (136:11) (137:12) (137:22) (138:6) (138:16) (138:19) (138:21) (139:3) (141:13) (141:23) (142:4) (142:12) (143:13) (143:24) (144:3) (144:5) (144:17) (144:18) (144:25) (145:6) (145:13) (1.45:19) (145:20) (146:18) (146:21) (148:6) (151:3) | +|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 131:12331 8 | (41:2) (41:8) (56:10) (56:15) (60:21) (69:4) (69:13) (70:7) (72:5) (86:9) (86:14) (86:21) (95:6) (103:5) (103 :9) (103:11) (104:14) (104:20) (109:5) (109:10) (109:15) (109:22) (110:1) (111:16) (111:23) (112:1) (113:3) (115:15) (126:1) (126:4) (126:9) (126:16) (127:2) (128:17)1130:9) (134:11) (140:5) (140:23) (140:25) (144:10) (146:11) | +| ERRAT* | (3:11) (151:1) (152:13) | +| ESQUIRI | (2 :3) (2:6) (2:12) (2:17) (151:21) (151:22) (152:5) (152:17)(152:18) | +| ESSENTIALLT | (122:2) | +| EBTIKATI | (130:15) (137:20) | +| IM | (23:10) (23:11) (26:1) (26:12) (36:16) (65:10) (70:13) (72:25) (73:19) (73:22) (81:18) (86:6) (117:13) (127:25) (128:8) (128:12) (131:2) (131:21)1147:22) | +| 1913111 | (37:2) (58:16) (61:13) (62:5) (63:16) | +| METS | (59:22) (59:2) (59:5) (61:1) (61:7) (61:91 (61:10) (61:16) (62:9) (63:11) | +| MR | (18:15) (20:24) (21:6) (24:24) (27:14) (27:1E) (38:17) (38:18) (41:21) (44:24) (44:25) (46:22) (47:2) (5012) (50:9) (56:5) (58:19) (58:20) (62:12) (64:22) (71:15) (72:23) (73:7) (82:24) (86:9) (86:11) (86:13) (86:16) (66:20) (86:23) (67:2) (90:12) (91:14) (95:12) (96:17) (98:24) (99:4) (102:11) (102:14) (103:17) (103:24) (104:1) (105:11) (105:14) (107:24) (108:11) (108:18) (109:24) (112:1) (112:20) (112:22) (113:3) (113:10) (113:25) (114:3) (114:5) (114:8) (114:11) (114:18) (114:20) (115:14) (115:18) (115:21) (115:24) (116:25) (117:4) (123:10) (123:13)(124:4) (129:8) (129:12) (129:17) (129:22) (13022) (131:13) (138:15) (138:18) (138:21) (140:2) (140:23) (142:24) (143:12) S (145:12) (145:18) (146:18) (146:20) | +| EVERT | (111:22) (126:7) (132:10) (143:10) | +| ZERRTBODY | (18:4) (111:13) | +| EVERYBODT ' | (142:19) | +| EVERYTEINO | (35:3) (63:4) (65:25) (89:4) (89:6) | +| EVIDENCE | (20:6) | +| EXACT | (48:6) (51:5) (69:24) (80:4) (84:7) | +| EXACTI.Y | (16:20) (22:8) (29:4) (33:18) C3 .14 (3 (46:16) (47:25) (51:5) (52:11) (67:14) (82 7) (10 : (102:20) (141:4) | +| RXANDUTIOA | (1:17) (3:3) (3:4) (5:1) (74:1 25:1) (148:3) | +| EXANMIT | (4:24) | +| EX-EOYFRIEND | (61:23) | +| EXCEPT | (91:3) | +| EXCEPTION | (75:22)(126:1 | +| EXCOSE | (16:4) (20:4)13 (32:18 (43:25) (44:14) | +| (51:22) (59:24) (70:23) ( (125:10) | 5:15) (83:0) (95:21) (119:8) | +| EXEIBIT | (90:18) (9 :9) (91:11) (94:8) | +| ZIMTS | (65:14) | +| EXPERIENCR | (129: .6)(146:23) | +| EXPERIENCIN | ) | +| r1PIRES | (149: | +| EXPLAIN | (65:6)( .10) | +| WXPLAINED | (73:1 )(75:1) | +| IETWET | (16:5) (72:1) (121:13) (123:17) | +| Ensa | (30:14) (110:21) (139:12) (139:22) | +| sm | (140:18) F | +| FACE | (39:9) (39:14) | +| FACE-TO-FACE | (115:25) | +| ►ACILITY | (1:15) (4:5) | +| FACINE | (11:13) | +| na | (14:2) (14:16) (78:13) (78:22) (94:23) (96:13) (104:15) (125:9) (126:8) | +| FACTO | (151:19) | +| FAIR | (40:11) (77:21) (90:14 ) | +| FAIRE | (51:11) | +| FANILT | (132:20) (132:22) (132:23) | +| PARTAZIES | (107:24) (108:2) | + +| rAm | (70:18) | +|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| FAST | (25:20) (26:11) (26:13) (49:1) | +| FATOIR | (102:7) | +| FATEER ' 8 | (133:4) | +| FAX | (2 :5) (2:9) (2:15) (2:20) | +| FBI ROVEle | (77:24) | +| FEDERAL | (66:2) (67:4) (6716) (67:20) (68:6) (68:25) (69:4) | +| PEDERALLT | (67:131(73:11) | +| FED9 | (67:17) | +| PW. | (58:18) (58:19) (59:21) (62:1 :3)(64:9)(100:13) | +| (104:4)(147:18)(147:20)(147:21) | 3) | +| PEILLNO | (147:6) | +| FELL | (122:21) | +| FILLON | (49:9) | +| 111.018Y | (14 :23) (15:5) (1 | +| MT | (63:1) | +| MOLE | (17:10) (52: 9:18) | +| rammt | (56:5) | +| rxrrzsmte | (1:1) | +| FILE | (122:5 :17 | +| MAD | (75* (82:25) (83:13) (83 :15) (83:17) | +| mal | 25) (99:6) (99:20) (99:21) (122:18) | +| 2 | 22) (124:1) | +| 71124 | (117:9) (117:15) (117:18) (117:20) (118:1) (120:11) | +| PIRE8 | (117:14) | +| FIRST | (4 :22) 15:15) (6:21) (12:5) (12:6) (14:6) (17:25) | +| PIRST-YRAR | (131:9) | +| FIM» | (118:10) | +| EISTOS | (2:18) (152:5) | +| FM | (7:21) (13:6) (37:4) (91:8) (132:14) | +| FLICRINO | (48:25) (49:7) | +| FLIP | (137:4) | +| FLORIDA | (1:2) 11:16) (1:19) (2:4) (2:8) (2:131(2:19) (4:6) | +| FELLOWS | (4:24) | +| POR | (1:2) (1:18) (4:6) (4 :9) (4 :15) (5:3) (5:11) (6:22) | + +FORCE + +HAD + +**FORCE** (115:14) (115:15) (115:19) +**FORCED** (115:8) +**FOREGOING** (150:9) (151:19) +**FORM** (20:1) (20:4) (29:19) (41:24) (50:4) (57:4) (57:6) + (88:11) (88:17) (89:2) (95:22) (117:12) (119:7) (122:21) + (125:7) (125:12) (125:17) (125:22) (127:10) (128:4) (128:10) + (129:1) (129:10) (129:15) (129:20) (129:25) (130:5) (130:13) + (130:21) (130:24) (132:8) (133:11) (134:12) (134:17) + (135:19) (135:22) (136:17) (137:14) (137:23) (137:25) + (138:8) (138:24) (139:16) (141:2) (141:14) (142:6) (142:14) + (143:3) (143:15) (144:11) (144:22) (145:3) (145:10) (145:15) + (146:14) (146:25) (147:19) +**FORMER** (88:20) +**FORMERLY** (118:12) +**FORTH** (93:19) +**FORWARDED** (152:13) (152:14) +**FOUGHT** (12:18) (13:4) +**FOUND** (33:17) (70:13) +**FOUR** (29:17) (31:23) (32:15) (32:17) (33:10) (70:1) + (132:14) (132:16) (132:17) +**FPR** (1:18) (149:16) (150:22) +**██████-KISSED** (62:23) (62:24) +**FRIDAY** (152:10) +**FRIEND** (42:19) (101:6) (101:9) (101:10) (101:24) (102:2) +**FRIENDS** (86:4) (101:14) (102:3) +**FRIEND'S** (42:21) +**FROM** (20:15) (20:19) (20:20) (22:14) (22:15) (22:16) + (22:21) (22:25) (28:19) (35:11) (45:21) (45:24) (52:10) + (72:4) (77:7) (79:2) (80:8) (80:19) (81:2) (81:13) (82:1) + (83:11) (83:21) (88:22) (99:20) (119:17) (120:3) (120:4) + (121:7) (121:14) (122:10) (123:14) (124:21) (130:16) + (131:13) (132:22) (133:23) (139:2) (139:15) (142:2) (142:21) + (144:16) (152:10) +**FRONT** (9:24) (13:21) (52:19) (53:10) (84:8) +**FRUSTRATED** (116:4) +**FUCKING** (91:14) (91:18) (91:21) (92:6) +**FULL** (94:9) +**FULLY** (127:16) +**FUNDING** (93:24) +**FURTHER** (148:1) (150:12) +**FUTURE** (138:22) + +**G** + +**GADSDEN** (1:15) (4:5) (17:20) (17:22) +**GAMES** (89:24) (90:1) +**GARDENS** (67:24) +**GAVE** (27:11) (57:3) (90:12) (106:23) +**GENERALLY** (75:24) (135:11) (143:20) +**GENTLEMEN** (132:1) +**GET** (37:18) (38:14) (38:22) (42:17) (48:22) (53:2) (70:20) + (81:17) (85:17) (104:14) (116:14) (116:25) (117:4) (124:2) + (131:13) (134:19) (135:1) (135:24) (136:2) (136:3) (137:9) + (139:7) (141:6) +**GETS** (18:4) +**GETTING** (45:15) (47:7) (82:1) (106:16) +**GIRL** (39:11) (39:12) (48:23) (59:7) (100:20) (102:12) + (110:3) (111:11) (113:10) (113:12) (116:1) (116:2) (116:5) + (126:7) (132:10) (132:12) (132:17) (135:17) (136:2) (137:5) + (137:9) (137:13) (137:17) (137:20) (139:18) (140:2) (140:7) + (141:17) (142:18) +**GIRLS** (59:11) (59:14) (74:2) (103:15) (109:8) (109:25) + (111:6) (111:15) (111:18) (111:22) (126:1) (126:3) (126:8) + (126:12) (126:15) (126:17) (126:18) (126:21) (130:8) + (130:16) (131:1) (132:4) (132:10) (139:4) (139:5) (139:13) + (140:24) (141:11) (141:16) (142:11) (142:12) (142:20) + (143:14) (143:19) +**GIRL'S** (139:21) +**GIRLS'** (59:19) +**GIVE** (10:22) (43:16) (59:21) (82:7) (86:23) (97:4) (109:6) + (113:5) (114:15) (130:15) (131:2) (136:3) (147:8) +**GIVEN** (21:25) (86:13) (86:20) (89:4) (122:17) (139:9) +**GIVING** (51:11) (53:12) (97:16) (110:5) (110:16) (145:6) +**GOALS** (98:8) (98:12) +**GOING** (16:4) (18:7) (19:1) (30:6) (31:2) (31:18) (32:10) + (32:20) (32:21) (40:20) (41:1) (41:7) (41:17) (44:14) (47:2) + (51:22) (56:9) (59:10) (65:24) (66:3) (66:24) (67:4) (67:11) + (71:25) (72:6) (72:12) (72:17) (72:24) (73:5) (73:14) (74:6) + (74:11) (74:17) (76:10) (79:25) (81:15) (82:20) (83:5) + +(83:25) (87:12) (88:11) (93:20) (95:21) (96:20) (96:21) + (98:2) (104:2) (104:13) (104:20) (105:1) (115:3) (131:19) + (133:23) (136:7) (139:7) (141:8) (146:11) +**GOLD** (23:23) (24:2) (24:13) (48:16) +**GOLDBERGER** (2:6) (2:7) (3:3) (3:4) (4:16) (5:2) (12:1) + (13:12) (13:16) (14:1) (14:20) (15:14) (16:7) (16:11) (16:13) + (20:3) (20:7) (26:2) (26:23) (28:10) (29:21) (30:1) (30:3) + (30:15) (30:21) (30:23) (31:7) (31:10) (31:15) (31:20) + (32:10) (32:16) (32:20) (32:24) (33:4) (33:6) (33:13) (33:21) + (33:25) (34:1) (34:19) (36:9) (36:13) (42:3) (42:6) (43:11) + (43:15) (44:4) (44:8) (44:18) (50:8) (50:12) (50:15) (52:1) + (54:19) (57:8) (57:10) (57:12) (57:17) (60:1) (60:4) (60:7) + (60:10) (61:6) (64:3) (64:6) (64:8) (64:20) (64:21) (69:9) + (69:18) (69:20) (70:25) (71:3) (71:6) (71:20) (72:3) (72:21) + (73:2) (74:10) (74:23) (75:7) (75:14) (75:16) (76:3) (76:8) + (76:14) (76:17) (76:22) (77:1) (77:3) (77:6) (77:9) (77:13) + (77:21) (77:23) (78:4) (78:9) (78:13) (78:17) (78:21) (79:1) + (79:6) (79:11) (79:16) (79:21) (79:24) (80:6) (80:13) (80:24) + (81:6) (82:18) (82:22) (82:23) (83:10) (83:12) (83:16) + (83:20) (83:23) (84:4) (84:6) (84:10) (84:13) (87:10) (87:16) + (87:21) (87:24) (88:2) (88:13) (88:15) (88:19) (88:25) (89:4) + (89:10) (89:15) (89:21) (89:23) (90:4) (90:17) (90:20) + (90:24) (91:2) (91:5) (91:13) (94:14) (94:17) (94:20) (94:24) + (95:3) (95:5) (95:8) (95:9) (96:1) (96:6) (96:9) (96:12) + (96:19) (97:4) (97:10) (97:17) (97:25) (98:7) (98:12) (98:18) + (98:22) (98:24) (99:4) (99:9) (99:16) (99:19) (99:24) (100:3) + (100:6) (100:9) (104:3) (104:7) (104:11) (104:12) (106:11) + (106:12) (109:4) (110:21) (111:1) (111:21) (119:9) (119:11) + (119:21) (120:1) (121:16) (121:18) (121:19) (122:15) + (122:24) (123:7) (123:18) (123:22) (124:1) (124:4) (124:20) + (124:24) (125:7) (125:12) (125:17) (125:22) (127:10) (128:3) + (128:10) (129:1) (129:10) (129:15) (129:20) (129:25) (130:5) + (130:13) (130:21) (130:24) (132:8) (133:11) (134:12) + (134:17) (135:19) (135:22) (136:17) (137:14) (137:23) + (137:25) (138:8) (138:24) (139:16) (141:2) (141:14) (142:6) + (142:8) (142:14) (143:3) (143:15) (144:11) (144:22) (145:3) + (145:10) (145:15) (146:14) (146:25) (147:19) (148:4) (148:8) + (151:22) (152:18) +**GONE** (42:5) (56:14) +**GOOD** (51:11) (51:21) (66:20) (94:17) (98:22) (101:24) + (102:1) +**GOT** (16:8) (23:17) (24:12) (30:16) (30:18) (37:19) (38:5) + (38:16) (38:18) (39:4) (45:21) (45:22) (45:24) (47:9) (49:7) + (61:15) (63:2) (86:4) (127:4) (134:10) (136:14) (137:18) + (137:20) +**GOTTEN** (11:16) +**GOVERNMENT** (80:8) (80:19) (99:20) (143:23) +**GRAB** (138:10) +**GRADE** (131:17) (131:19) +**GRADUATE** (131:13) +**GRAMS** (9:5) (9:6) (9:7) (12:16) (12:19) (12:20) +**GRAND** (27:22) (27:24) (28:14) (28:16) +**GRANDPARENTS** (133:4) +**██████** (140:18) +**GREENSBORO** (1:15) (4:5) +**GREW** (61:12) +**GROCERY** (67:23) +**GROUND** (96:23) +**GROUNDS** (76:15) (76:17) +**GROUP** (70:15) (81:15) +**GUARD** (64:9) +**GUESS** (36:20) (47:10) (95:7) (107:3) (112:7) (112:8) + (119:24) (122:13) (126:5) (139:23) +**GUILT** (127:24) (127:25) +**GUILTY** (9:21) (9:25) (10:4) (10:9) (10:25) (11:21) (12:20) + (13:8) (13:13) (13:17) (13:21) (14:3) (14:5) (14:7) (14:10) + (14:12) (15:16) (15:23) (16:15) (22:20) (31:23) (32:14) + (33:17) (34:2) (34:4) (34:9) (34:16) (34:20) (34:25) (35:3) + (35:5) (35:25) (36:5) (36:9) (36:14) (36:19) (66:22) (71:21) + (73:10) (73:14) (77:25) (78:6) (127:14) (127:20) (128:8) + (128:16) +**GUY** (73:21) + +**H** + +**HABITUAL** (6:10) (6:15) (7:17) +**HAD** (6:19) (7:5) (10:12) (10:19) (10:20) (10:22) (11:3) + (11:9) (12:16) (15:10) (19:23) (21:24) (24:2) (27:18) (28:11) + (28:12) (29:17) (33:10) (35:14) (35:15) (35:25) (37:5) (42:4) + +| (50:22) (60:2) (60:23) (62:13) (64:16) (67:1) (67:20) (67:21) | HIGHLIGHTED (89:12) (89:15) (89:19) | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| (69:5) (69:14) (70:11) (70:13) (70:14) (72:10) (73:16) | HIGHLIGHTING (90:5) (91:4) | +| (73:23) (73:24) (74:3) (74:15) (76:5) (79:6) (83:18) (97:15) | HIGHWAY (1:15) (4:5) | +| (98:20) (103:1) (103:24) (104:9) (105:11) (106:7) (106:14) | ██████ (131:19) | +| (112:17) (113:1) (115:11) (118:12) (121:8) (121:14) (121:20) | HILLSBOROUGH (9:1) | +| (121:22) (122:4) (122:6) (123:3) (124:7) (125:9) (129:8) | HIM (6:3) (6:23) (6:24) (7:5) (10:9) (35:10) (35:16) (63:4) | +| (129:12) (129:17) (129:22) (130:2) (137:13) (140:21) | (67:12) (67:15) (67:21) (72:11) (87:2) (93:5) (95:15) (96:4) | +| (141:12) (142:4) (144:12) (145:5) (145:12) (145:18) (146:5) | (96:14) (96:16) (96:17) (100:16) (105:12) (105:14) (110:3) | +| (146:21) (148:5) | (113:2) (113:13) (113:14) (116:23) (117:13) (120:12) | +| HAIR (140:17) | (129:14) (129:19) (130:4) (132:4) (132:12) (134:8) (135:25) | +| HALF (59:13) | (136:3) (136:4) (136:5) (136:24) (138:10) (139:4) (139:5) | +| HAND (7:11) (37:20) (104:23) (105:7) (105:12) (105:15) | (141:20) (144:6) (145:1) (146:21) (146:23) (147:4) (147:8) | +| (105:20) (106:16) (106:24) (147:8) (149:10) | (147:10) | +| HANDFUL (69:25) | HIRE (17:14) (144:1) | +| HANG (143:9) | HIS (4:14) (5:15) (6:20) (7:2) (19:7) (35:12) (70:3) (71:21) | +| HAPPEN (66:25) (105:18) (107:1) (134:10) | (71:22) (73:25) (78:6) (80:15) (102:7) (104:23) (105:7) | +| HAPPENED (24:20) (58:17) (59:6) (100:20) (120:9) (134:16) | (105:11) (105:15) (105:20) (106:16) (106:24) (112:2) (112:4) | +| (135:21) (137:2) (141:5) (141:12) (141:21) (147:3) (147:11) | (112:5) (112:12) (112:13) (113:13) (113:15) (114:12) | +| HAPPY (44:17) (64:10) (75:23) | (114:22) (115:3) (115:24) (120:21) (122:4) (134:21) (134:22) | +| HARD (134:5) | (134:23) (134:24) (136:24) (137:3) (138:13) (139:2) (142:5) | +| HARD-ON (63:3) | (143:4) (144:18) (144:19) (145:2) (147:7) (147:8) | +| HAS (6:3) (6:19) (6:24) (33:3) (53:14) (53:18) (74:15) | HISTORY (6:19) (6:20) | +| (88:19) (94:8) (116:17) (116:21) (117:1) (122:16) (152:7) | HOLD (84:24) | +| (152:13) | HOME (56:10) (86:14) (86:21) (103:5) (109:6) (109:10) | +| HASN'T (76:5) | (109:15) (109:22) (110:1) (111:23) (112:2) (112:4) (112:5) | +| HATEFUL (91:25) | (112:13) (113:3) (114:13) (115:15) (126:1) (126:4) (126:16) | +| HAVE (5:19) (7:25) (8:7) (11:7) (11:18) (11:15) (11:16) | (130:9) (140:5) | +| (11:20) (16:21) (17:1) (17:4) (17:18) (17:24) (19:4) (19:10) | HOUR (119:4) | +| (19:17) (20:19) (21:3) (21:6) (21:24) (26:3) (26:20) (26:24) | HOURS (152:10) | +| (27:1) (27:8) (28:11) (28:12) (30:14) (31:5) (31:10) (32:7) | HOUSE (40:21) (41:2) (41:8) (56:15) (60:22) (86:9) (102:7) | +| (33:16) (34:7) (34:8) (34:22) (34:23) (34:24) (34:25) (35:5) | (103:9) (103:13) (104:14) (104:20) (108:9) (108:14) (111:16) | +| (37:7) (37:8) (37:9) (37:12) (37:20) (38:7) (38:20) (38:22) | (115:3) (126:9) (133:25) (134:4) (134:21) (140:23) (140:25) | +| (39:6) (39:22) (40:2) (44:15) (48:11) (49:3) (51:4) (51:12) | (143:18) (143:19) (144:19) | +| (52:12) (52:23) (53:10) (54:23) (56:1) (56:14) (57:21) (58:2) | HOUSEHOLD (133:9) | +| (58:22) (58:23) (59:2) (59:3) (59:6) (60:5) (60:8) (62:17) | HOW (5:19) (10:6) (10:7) (13:10) (16:23) (18:5) (18:10) | +| (63:19) (68:24) (74:3) (74:7) (74:13) (74:23) (75:11) (76:16) | (18:13) (19:2) (21:1) (21:3) (21:10) (22:11) (26:3) (27:8) | +| (76:22) (77:14) (77:15) (78:9) (78:18) (79:22) (80:1) (82:11) | (28:11) (30:25) (31:5) (31:13) (32:7) (35:14) (36:16) (37:7) | +| (82:24) (84:8) (85:7) (85:12) (85:13) (85:14) (85:17) (87:12) | (36:22) (42:17) (46:6) (46:25) (49:14) (49:19) (50:21) | +| (87:17) (87:25) (88:3) (88:10) (88:16) (89:1) (89:6) (89:7) | (50:24) (61:25) (62:2) (63:7) (66:3) (67:9) (69:21) (69:24) | +| (89:12) (91:16) (91:19) (91:20) (92:4) (92:5) (92:18) (92:23) | (70:22) (71:7) (71:10) (76:10) (79:16) (85:17) (85:23) | +| (92:25) (96:23) (96:24) (97:15) (97:25) (98:2) (98:4) (98:24) | (91:20) (92:4) (92:13) (92:14) (92:25) (94:1) (96:16) (96:17) | +| (99:4) (100:19) (102:11) (102:14) (102:25) (103:12) (103:20) | (101:3) (101:15) (103:1) (109:5) (111:18) (113:8) (113:9) | +| (104:17) (105:17) (105:19) (110:13) (110:19) (110:21) | (119:1) (119:3) (127:1) (127:12) (131:2) (132:2) (137:19) | +| (112:15) (114:5) (114:8) (114:11) (116:14) (118:23) (118:24) | (138:1) (139:7) (142:20) (144:14) (147:18) (147:23) | +| (119:10) (120:3) (121:8) (122:11) (122:24) (123:9) (124:25) | HOWELL (92:15) (92:16) | +| (133:2) (134:19) (136:21) (137:6) (139:23) (140:23) (141:6) | HUNDRED (34:23) | +| (141:10) (142:2) (142:20) (143:20) (145:7) (145:22) (146:17) | HUNDRED-PERCENT (81:18) | +| (147:6) (147:17) (148:1) (148:8) (151:18) (152:11) (152:12) | HURTING (147:10) | +| HAVEN'T (22:1) (22:4) (26:4) (51:8) (60:9) (60:23) (102:5) | HUSBAND'S (38:1) | +| (107:8) | HYPOTHESIS (99:18) | +| HAVING (4:22) (20:10) (20:19) (22:5) (22:21) (46:22) (69:3) | | +| (96:1) (102:23) (105:19) (111:10) (125:3) (127:20) (127:24) | | +| (129:4) (129:7) (134:1) (134:5) (139:2) (139:12) (140:2) | | +| (140:8) | | +| HAYES (17:7) (17:9) (19:7) (19:9) | | +| HEAD (129:6) | | +| HELD (109:3) | | +| HELP (30:5) (70:18) (82:3) | | +| HELPED (70:20) | | +| HELPS (40:18) | | +| HER (23:10) (23:11) (32:21) (33:21) (36:11) (61:5) (66:18) | | +| (68:2) (69:2) (69:23) (69:25) (71:8) (71:9) (74:15) (74:16) | | +| (74:17) (75:8) (75:24) (76:5) (77:15) (78:10) (78:22) (79:7) | | +| (80:5) (80:7) (80:17) (88:7) (88:8) (89:13) (89:16) (89:20) | | +| (90:9) (94:14) (96:25) (97:13) (97:14) (97:15) (98:18) | | +| (100:23) (101:1) (101:5) (101:6) (101:7) (101:8) (101:24) | | +| (102:5) (102:24) (103:14) (103:17) (103:25) (107:8) (110:4) | | +| (134:2) (134:6) (134:7) (137:5) (137:10) (139:24) (140:10) | | +| (140:13) (143:7) (143:10) | | +| HERE (4:16) (5:25) (17:24) (18:9) (18:15) (30:9) (34:6) | | +| (34:25) (51:11) (58:13) (59:15) (59:16) (60:20) (64:6) | | +| (87:24) (88:13) (90:21) (92:8) (96:19) | | +| HEREBY (150:6) | | +| HERE'S (88:15) | | +| HEROIN (55:24) (56:1) (57:18) (57:25) (58:6) (58:10) | | +| (58:23) (61:3) | | +| HE'S (5:22) (6:19) (67:9) (100:14) (141:8) | | +| HIGH (131:16) | | + +IMPROPERLY (77:18) INAPPROPRIATE (62:20) (62:21) (76:2) INC (1:18) INCARCERATED (5:22) (5:23)16:3) INCIDENT (23:14) (23 16) (24:7)124:20) (25: 9H25:18) (48:23) (48:24) (49:2) (49:6) (62:14) (133:22) INCLUDED (83:6) INCORPORATE (97:21)(98:5) INCORRECT (44:13) INDEX (3:1) INDICATED (29:17) INDICATES (31:3) INDICTED 1122:22) INDIVIDUALLY (1:8)(151:4)(152:1) INDIVIDUALS (95:24) INDUCE (113:22) INFORMATION (75:13) (80:18) (97:9) (119:13) (121:14) (122:9)1122:10)(122211) INFORM/NO (75:9) INITIALS (38:1) INQUIRED (76:16) INSTITUTION (6:25) (17:19) (17:22) INSTRUCT (74:17) (77:4) (96:21) INSTRUCTING (75:7) (75:8) (124:17) INSTRUCTION (77:12) (78:3) (78:8) (78112) (78:16) (78:20) (78:25) (79:5) (79:10) (79:15) (79:20) (80:12) (80:23) (97:22) (98:6) (98:11) (98:15) (99:3) (99:8) (99:15) (99:23) (100:21(124:21) INSTRUCTIONS (97:24) (122 : 7) (122:17) INTEND (74:24) INTERCOURSE (138:16) INTERESTED (150:16) INTERFERING (146:22) INTERNATIONALLY (67:9) INTERNET (114:5) (114:11) INTERRUPT (32:24) (74:7) (135:2)1136:7) INTERRUPTED (135:16) INTERVIEW (80:14) (81: 9H87: 11) (87:18) (88:3) (88:5) (95:18) INTERVIEWED (80:2) (80:25) (87:5) INTERVIEWEE (89:3) INTERVIEWERS (89:3) INTO (12:13) (23:17) (29:2) (29:14) (32 z6) (3 (43:18)150:18) (65:6) (78:6) (90:6)196:20) :7) (105:11) (105:15) (105:20) (106:16) (106: (134:24) (139:22) (147:23) INTOXICATED (47:9) INTRODUCE (4:9)(113:10) INTRODUCED (118:24)(131:4)(133 INVALIDATE (98:13) INVASION (124:18) INVESTIGATING (67:8) INVESTIGATION (80:18) INVESTIGATORS 1118:8) INVOLVE (48:25) INVOLVED (26:17)(- •:21) 7:7) (131:7) (133:16) (141:24) INVOLVEMENT (134: 6) INVOLVING (79:18 IRRELEVANT :16) (96:24) (97:7) ISSUE (41:6) ( :13) 58:14) ISSUES (74:12) .8)(134:1) ITEMS (22:21) (8 :21) ITS (88:10) (88:11) IT'S (12 :15) (17:20) (18:22) (32:25) (39:13) (39:19) (43:11) (58:20) (65:5) (77:16) (83:23) (83:24) (84:7) (85:12) (89:10) (92:12) (92:13) (96:24) (105:4) (142:9) I'VE (21:10) (30:16) (30:18) (35:3) (51:6) (51:7) (54:24) (59:14) (59:151 (60:19) (60:20) (75:23) (89:4) (89:15) (100:18) J Ma (2:6) (2:12) (4:12) (4:16) (108:11)1108:13) (108:15) (141:8) (151:21) (152:17) =Or (138:12) JACK= (60:19) JACILTNO (147:7) JACQUELINE (59:19) (60:13) JAPPE (2:18)(152:5) + +JAIL (22:25) (27:8) (27:15) 07:18) (27:19) (28:4) (28:13) (29:8) (35:9) (35:11) (35:14)153:15/ (54:8) (54:14) (64:9) (100:14) (100:16) JANUARY (81:2) (81:3) (81:8) JASON (72:16) JAY (92:15) (92:16) =Mt= (1:5) (1:18) (4:8) (4:17) (4:19) (35:81 (37:5) (41:2) (41:8) (47:20) (56:10) (56:15) (58:11) (59:10) (59:11) (60:21) (65:24) (66:21)1613:71 (79:18) (80:10) (86:8) (91:14) 1100:4)1100:10) (100:21) (103:5) (106:15)1107:11) (109:1) (109:5) 1114:24) (125:3)1125:5)1125:9) (125:11) (125:15) (126:11 (126:3) 1126:15) (128:25) (129:5) 1129:8) 1129:13) (129:18) (129:23) (130:3) (130:10) MO: 11) (130:20) (130:22) (131:4) (131:18) (132:2) (132:7) (132:20) (133:16) (133:20) (134:11) (136:11)1137:12)11 :22)1138:6) 40 3) (141:13) 4)(144:2)(144:5) 45:45:13)(145:19) 149: (149:16)(150:6) (138:16) (138:19) (138:21) (140:5) ( (141:23) (142:4) (142:12) (143:13) (144:9) (144:17) (144:18) (144: (145:20) (146:11) (146:18) (14 (150:22) (151:3) (152:1) (152'1 JEFFREY'S 14000)150:1 JENNE (118:12) JESSIE (101:12) JEW 191:15) (91:18 .6) JOOLDEEROER (2:10 JOHN (2:12)1131:2 JOSEFSBERO JOURNAL ( JUDGE (9: (13:21)(f1:2 2)(14:9)(02:2) JUDICIAL JULIAN JULIENNE JUMP PI (10:4) (10:21) (12:6) (13:7) (13:12) (17:9) :8) JUNE' ( :19)(22:20)(27:3) = 1131:24) (132:1) (134:15) JUST (6:7) (6:8) (16:20) (30:19) (32:5) (33:9) (34:23) (38:11) (39:19) (43:13) (46:11) (46:191 (47:8) (48:24) (50:22) (51:4) (51:9) (51:14) (56:11) (57:15)158:20) (58:25) (59:1) (59:24) (67:10) (67:11) (74:7)175:23/ 177:101(81:15) (90:2) (90:22) (98:16) (100:1311101:14) (113:1) 1116:4) (117:13) (117:14) (118:2) (118:21) (122:21) (122:24) (123:18) (123:19) (123:22) (124:1) (126:19) (126:20) (131:20) (131:21) (132:13) (132:17) (133:5)1133:21) (134:2) (134:6)1135:3) (135:11) (136:10) (136:23) (137:15)1138:10) (138:11) (139:3) (139:8) (141:5) (141:7) (141:16) (143:9) (144:13) (1451221 (145:24) (146:2) 1147:7) (147:20) 047:22/ JUSTICE (8342) (81:13) (100213) JUVENILE (127:3) (127:5) (127:9) KM (32:10) (104:17) (109:14) (116:15) KM- (62:16) KEEPING (64:6) (142:25) (143:12) (143:20) 'S (143:18) WI (118:12) =PT (72:9) MID (18:23)155:14) (93:12) (114:5) (131:18) (133:25) (143:9)(148:6) WIDE 1145:18) =TOM (134:22) (137:10) =Of (35:14) (42:19) (45:18) (45:20) (630) (108:15) (115:2) (117:7) (123:8) 101081 (5:21) (6:2) (6:5)16:15) (6:19) (6:20) (7:2) (7:20) (8:21) (10:15)111:13)113:1) (13:2) (13:10) (16:18)110:2) (21:3) (23:10)123:11) (23:12) (23:13) (23:14) (24:16) (26:12) (27:10) (27:11)129:11) (29:13) (30:10) (3106) (34:13) (35:17) (36:16) (45:22) (46:24) (47:1) (47:2) (47:9) (47:25) (49:231 (51:6) (51:8) (51:10) (52:10) (58:12) (58:25) (59:2) (59:11) (59:12) (59:15) (60:12) (60:14)163:16) (63:17) (64:25) (65:1) (65:14) (65:16) (65:24)167:9) (67:11) (67:12) (70:12) (70:14) (70:15) (70:16) (72:9)(72:14) 173:16) (73:22) (73:25) (74:1) (76:9)(79:11) (85:9) (88:20) 190:2) (91:19) (92:8) (92:14) (9201) (93:9) (101:8) (101:17) (101:21) (102:25) (103:1) (103:24) (105:5) (107:6) (107:8) (107:10) (107:12) (108:2) (108:5) (108:10) (109:12) (110:17) + +| (110:18) (111:3) (111:11) (111:12) (113:13) (117:14) | LION'S (39:9) (39:13) | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| (117:23) (119:16) (121:2) (121:8) (121:22) (122:4) (127:1) | LIQUOR (42:13) | +| (127:13) (127:19) (127:23) (128:11) (128:15) (132:15) | LIST (83:6) (109:14) | +| (132:17) (132:22) (134:1) (134:4) (134:6) (134:25) (135:13) | LISTED (152:14) | +| (135:15) (136:2) (137:7) (137:17) (137:18) (139:7) (139:9) | LITTLE (20:23) (63:18) (100:22) | +| (140:7) (141:6) (142:10) (142:17) (143:9) (144:14) (147:10) | LIVE (18:13) (38:23) (102:7) (134:3) | +| (147:24) | LIVED (45:18) (45:23) (102:6) | +| KNOWLEDGE (21:13) (51:12) (87:2) (119:10) | LIVING (7:4) (7:8) | +| KNOWS (121:13) | LOCATED (4:4) | +| KUYKENDALL (66:11) (66:13) (67:23) (68:5) (68:6) (68:25) | LONG (5:19) (50:24) (70:14) (92:13) (105:5) (119:1) (119:3) | +| (69:22) (72:16) (80:3) (80:17) (80:25) (81:12) | (152:10) | +| L | LONGEST (27:14) (27:18) | +| LADIES (132:1) | LOOK (30:4) (30:11) (50:9) (84:10) (84:12) (87:13) (89:9) | +| LADIES' (63:24) | (89:13) (89:16) (89:17) (91:2) (91:5) (94:7) (95:17) (96:2) | +| LADY (25:24) (26:10) (70:8) (70:20) | (140:15) (141:7) (147:16) | +| LAKE (131:12) (131:13) | LOOKED (22:1) (126:18) (132:10) (141:16) (144:13) | +| LAKES (2:13) | LOOKING (29:7) | +| LAP (52:14) (52:18) (53:1) (53:12) | LOSS (100:4) | +| LAST (35:7) (37:5) (37:10) (37:13) (51:23) (60:12) (96:7) | LOT (25:24) (31:16) (37:8) (51:5) (51:6) (51:7) (54:24) | +| (96:8) (107:11) (116:20) (140:11) (140:13) | (100:19) (134:1) (134:4) (141:3) | +| LATE (142:9) | LOTS (74:23) | +| LATER (25:11) | LOUD (31:25) (32:1) | +| LAUDERDALE (2:19) (152:6) | LOWER (91:9) | +| LAW (117:12) (117:14) (117:15) (117:20) (117:25) (120:11) | LSD (55:9) | +| (126:23) | | +| LAWSUIT (74:14) (82:13) (83:2) (84:17) (84:23) (85:2) | M | +| (97:9) (99:1) (119:12) (119:17) (121:9) (121:10) (121:23) | (21:12) (31:8) (31:15) (36:18) (36:25) (44:9) (50:16) | +| (121:24) (122:5) (122:18) (123:9) (123:10) (123:14) (124:5) | (66:19) (91:17) (99:25) (100:17) (102:9) (117:11) | +| LAWYER (11:3) (11:7) (11:8) (11:23) (17:6) (17:12) (17:14) | MAD (141:20) | +| (19:6) (92:16) (96:25) (99:5) (110:13) (116:25) (117:4) | MADE (62:14) (63:3) (63:4) (69:5) (79:12) (85:13) (86:5) | +| (124:21) (127:2) (128:18) | (92:9) (100:18) (113:16) (139:9) | +| LAWYERS (118:15) (121:21) | MAHAN (1:19) (152:8) | +| LAY (136:1) | MAIL (82:5) | +| LAYING (63:2) | MAJORITY (126:11) | +| LEAD (75:12) (97:8) | MAKE (50:18) (58:18) (69:5) (69:14) (69:15) (73:8) (73:19) | +| LEADING (13:9) (13:15) (13:25) (14:19) (15:13) (20:5) | (73:22) (79:21) (84:11) (90:24) (104:15) (115:3) (126:5) | +| (25:21) (28:9) (31:21) (34:17) (69:7) (69:16) (80:12) (80:23) | MAKES (73:21) (147:20) | +| LEARN (18:10) (117:11) (119:5) (120:4) | MAKING (124:16) | +| LEARNED (120:3) (120:17) | MALE (52:19) | +| LEAST (111:19) (127:6) (132:14) (132:16) | MAN (17:10) (17:11) (129:9) | +| LEAVE (61:14) (63:4) (107:19) (126:20) (141:6) | MANDATORY (12:7) (12:12) (12:17) (12:24) (18:24) | +| LEAVING (18:16) (140:20) (143:19) | MANSION (134:11) (144:10) (146:11) | +| LED (133:19) (145:8) | MANY (15:10) (16:19) (21:3) (21:10) (22:7) (22:11) (26:3) | +| LEFT (37:15) (37:20) (38:7) (107:21) (107:22) (137:13) | (27:8) (28:11) (30:25) (31:5) (31:13) (32:7) (37:7) (50:22) | +| (137:18) (137:20) (140:20) (140:25) (141:12) | (53:7) (69:21) (69:24) (70:22) (71:7) (71:10) (73:17) (76:22) | +| LEG (38:7) (40:2) | (79:16) (91:20) (92:4) (92:25) (103:1) (109:5) (111:18) | +| LEGAL (16:5) (99:15) (124:15) (144:2) | (113:8) (113:9) (127:1) (131:1) (131:2) (137:19) (138:1) | +| LEHRMAN (2:18) (152:5) | (142:20) | +| LEONARD (131:21) | M | +| LESS (71:11) | MARGO (49:14) (49:17) | +| LET (15:7) (30:11) (42:20) (43:12) (43:15) (50:18) (76:8) | MARIA (70:9) | +| (90:24) (91:2) (91:5) (94:8) (102:7) (113:13) (123:18) | MARK (87:19) | +| (123:19) (123:22) (124:11) (135:2) (139:2) | MARKED (90:16) (91:11) (94:8) | +| LET'S (45:3) (54:25) (59:24) (84:24) (92:12) | MARKING (91:8) | +| LETTER (3:11) (78:14) (78:17) (79:2) (82:1) (82:5) (93:12) | MARLEY (39:6) (39:13) | +| LICENSE (85:12) | MARRIAGES (8:10) | +| LIE (104:19) | MARRIED (5:11) (5:17) (5:19) (6:23) (8:7) (38:5) | +| LIFE (8:10) (26:4) (27:9) (34:21) (35:7) (53:8) (53:14) | MASSAGE (104:23) (105:21) (106:16) (106:23) (109:6) | +| (58:17) (58:21) (58:23) (61:2) (61:7) (61:14) (71:24) (72:7) | (113:6) (114:15) (135:1) (135:24) (136:2) (136:4) (136:14) | +| (72:18) (73:6) | (136:19) (141:24) | +| LIKE (11:15) (18:13) (24:20) (24:21) (26:15) (30:23) | MASSAGED (136:24) | +| (35:15) (40:1) (42:8) (43:4) (43:6) (45:14) (46:19) (46:20) | MASSAGES (89:19) (90:8) (109:6) (109:22) (145:6) (145:8) | +| (47:9) (48:2) (55:15) (57:20) (58:12) (58:18) (58:19) (58:25) | MASSAGING (105:12) (147:4) | +| (59:7) (59:12) (61:24) (62:1) (63:9) (70:19) (70:21) (74:20) | M (82:2) | +| (77:13) (81:16) (81:17) (82:6) (85:15) (86:3) (86:6) (86:7) | MASTURBATED (53:10) | +| (87:20) (89:9) (90:15) (93:1) (94:23) (100:13) (100:24) | MATERIAL (75:12) (75:13) (97:8) | +| (101:4) (104:4) (104:16) (106:2) (108:5) (108:8) (108:9) | MATERIALITY (74:14) | +| (108:14) (109:8) (114:1) (114:25) (115:2) (115:25) (116:3) | MATH (116:16) (132:15) | +| (116:4) (131:25) (134:21) (134:22) (134:23) (134:25) (136:1) | MATTER (17:16) (33:7) (78:23) (80:10) (80:21) | +| (136:4) (136:5) (136:6) (136:23) (137:4) (137:16) (138:10) | MATTERS (74:13) | +| (138:13) (139:18) (139:19) (139:23) (140:16) (140:18) | MAXIMUM (11:19) (12:12) (13:1) (13:2) | +| (143:7) (143:8) (143:9) (144:20) (147:6) (147:7) | MAY (19:17) (21:21) (22:6) (22:12) (27:11) (29:16) (44:13) | +| LIKELHOOD (131:23) | (50:25) (56:21) (57:3) (57:13) (72:1) (74:19) (84:6) (89:17) | +| LINE (32:2) (32:5) (43:16) (44:16) (50:20) (89:12) (89:15) | (91:16) (91:19) (94:10) (103:12) (110:5) (110:19) (123:9) | +| (89:18) (96:7) (96:8) (110:18) | (145:22) | +| LINES (43:10) (89:11) (89:14) (89:17) | MAYBE (27:5) (29:17) (31:23) (32:13) (32:15) (32:16) (63:9) | + +(70:1) (84:11) (87:16) (88:2) (93:1) (101:15) (119:3) (131:20) NUN (6:18) (9:13) (10:15) (10:10) (13:2) (16:3) (24:16) (29:3)130:6) (30:10) (45:12) (45:13) (51:14) (51:17) (55:6) (58:15)159:6) (63:17) (65:4) (67:13) (67:17) (83:14) (86:18) (89:24) (105:14) (107:3) (108:7) (111:7) (112:24) (118:22) (137:16)(140:11) MEANING (9:17) (34:15) (109:21) MEANS (6:15) (36:7) (65:9) (93:14) (119:18) MEDIATION (93:3) MEET (69:21) (70:2)170:5) (79:16)(80:7) (81:7) (92:11) (100:23) (101:5) (101:7) (117:12) (117:20) (117:25) (110:5) (118:8) (118:12) (118:15) (118:18) (118:21)1142:24) (143:6) MEETING (69:11) (72:15) (81:21) (109:1)(118:7)1143:2) IGIMORANDOM (3:8) (87:11) (88:5) (95:1B) MEMORY (23:13) (30:4)130:13) (30:25) (50:8) (51 :13) (51:18)(90:11) (94:7) (95:17) MIN (53:10) (107:16) (107:19) NEWS (63:23) MEP (2:15) MET (47:20)159:14) (60:20) (67:22) (68:19) (69:12) (69:23) (69:24) (69:25) (70:8) (70:15) (72:23) (79:2) (80:5) 181:4) (81:14)181:15) (81:19) (92:13) (92:14) (92:23) (92:25) (93:5) (94:2) (94:5) (95:11) (95:15) (96:4) (96:14) (101:1) (101:6) (101:8) (101:24) (105:14) (113:12) (110:2) (118:21) (131:18) (140:2) (143:10) METH (55:1)(55:6) MICTEAMPHICTANINZ (8:23) (10:10)110:11) (55:8) METRAMPHETAMMIS (12:21) (16:22) (36:20) MIDDLE (43:14) (131:12) (131:14) NIGHT (34:22)148:11) (82:11) (87:21) (87:24) (107:1) (42:23) (43:1) (45:19) (45:21) (59:19) (60:13) (60:19) (98:25) (100:23) (100:25) (101:23) (102:11) (102:15) (103:2) (103:4) (103:13) (103:24) (104:2) (104:131 (104:19) (104:22) (105:6) (105:12)1105:19) (106:15) (107:61 (116:11) 1120:24) (122:6) (102:7)(108:19) MIND (23:3) (51:8) (90:22) (95:31 (128:24) MINE (16:16) MINIMUM (12:7) (12:11)112:17) (12:24)110:24)119:3) (1. MINIMUM-MANDATORY (10:12) (10:16) (10:20) (19:3) MINOR (73:18) MINORS (144:25) MINUTE (30:20)(85:3) MINUTES (136:4) MISLEADING (29:20) MISSING (56:7) MISSTATES (36:11) (54:16)161:5) MISTER 173:3) MISUNDERSTANDING (67:14) 167:16 MOLEST 1125:20) (129:14) (129:19) (130:11)1130:23) MOLESTATION (132:5) (132:6)(143: NOLESTATIONS (125:21) (14 . ) (145 MOLESTED (125:4)(125:5 5:10) MOLESTING (125:16) (125.19 MOM (61:15) (63:4) ( )11 :6) (133:8) (133:15) (133:22) (13411) (13 MOMENT (24 : a) ( (135:3)(136:10)1118: 5:22)(146:2) MONDAY (152 MONETARY (1381 MONEY (17:1) (52. ) (86:5) (93:15) (109:9) (111:24) (115:3) (126:5)11 6:20) (132:2) (132:21) (133:24) (137:6) (137:7) (139:4)1145:18) MONTHS (12:18) (13:5) (13:7) (13:13)113:17) (13:20) (14:7) (18:6) (18:8) (27:20) (28:4) (28:13) (28:15) (29:1) (29:8) (50:22)(54:18) (144:17) (145:14) 5) (74:7) (90:20) (122:25) MORE (9:5) (9:6) (29:7)130:7) (31:16)134:16) (34:20) (35:19) (58:19) (62:17) (71:12) (71:13) (73:17) (89:23) (89:25) (91:23) (92:5) (111:12) (134:2) (135:11) (135:15) (135:17) (142:22) /93ST-RECUR (22:16) 1101SER (62:13) (108:21) (148:5) MOTHER'S (62:25) ROVE (77:7) (82:20) (95:8) MOVED (117:14) (131:21) (133:3) MICE (16:23) (19:2) (31:11) (43:17) (43 :18) (46:6) (101:3) + +(132:2) (139:7) MUG (35:12) (73:25) MULTIPLE (70:24)(95:24) MIME (81:2) (81:12) M-Y-E-S-E-A (81:13) MYSELF (59:12) (103:15) (139:19) (139:20) N NADIA (140:3) (140:9) (140:15) (142:3) fl (104:14) (116:14) (129:4) (129:7) (129:9) PANE (4:12) (5:3) (5:6) (5:8) (5:11) (5:15) (19:7) (23:6) (23:12) (23:13) (24:15) (24:18) (24:24)125:1) (25:3) (25:6) (25:7) (42:21) (49:12) (49:14)149:15) (59:19) (59:22) (71:8) (108:6) (114:22) (114:25) (139:22) (140:2)1140:10) (140:11) (140:13) (142:19) (142:24) NAMED (41:17) (101:12) (101:17) (11 (140:9) NAMES (48:71 (48:11) (49:17)160: •12) (60:24) (81:19) MICE 138:201 (38:24) (38:25) NEED (12:2)(31:11)(64:11)( 76:9 NEEDLE (56:3) NEGOTIATE (113:25) NEGOTIATED (10:25)(11: NEGOTIATION (12:14) NEIGHBORHOOD (45: NEITHER (47:15) NESBITT (66:12)(6 23) (72:15) (73:21) (80:3) (80:17) (80:25 :12 NEVER (21: 142:5)162. 180:16) iiii ai ires NEW NEW 12) NEXT Nisi 31: 113R.:9 Ma" ( 3:8) NICHAT (10:21) MI (23:18) 124:20)125:9) (44:201 (46:25) (57:16) (86:3) NIGHTS (24:21) (25:11) NINE (54:18) NINTH (131:17) (131:19) NIPPLES (138:13) NOBODY (141:17) NO-CONTEST (127:21) NODS (129:6) NONE (25:22) NONETHELESS (88:14) NON-LAWYER (99:5) NON-PROSECUTION (64:25) (65:14) (65:20)179:12) (79:17) (80:16) (98:13) (99:10) (100:5) (100:11) NOR (150:14) (150:15) NORDIC (38:10) NORMALLY (113:14) (136:1) (137:8) (137:15) (143:7) NORTH (2:18)(152:6) NOT (7:22) (9:22) (10:2) (10:13) (11:5) (12:11) (13:8) (13:13) (13:20) (14:14) (14:17) (17:4) (20:6) (20:20) (21:13) (21:15) (24:8) (25:8) (25:22) (26:6) (26:12) (27:13) (28:7) (31:6)132:8) (33:5) (33:10) (33:18) (34:23) (3614) (36:7) (37:8) (41:10)141:11) (41:13} (45:22) (47:18) (53:3)153:16) (55:22) (62:11)164:8) (65:51 (65:14)168:14) (68:16) (68:18) (69:25) (70:12) (73:11) (74:15) (74:17) (74:21)175:4) (75:5) (75:11) (76:11) (76:12) (76:18) (76:19) (77:4) (78:18) (81:18) (82:9) (84:25) (86:1) (86:23) (87:2) (07:6) (48:2) (88:3) (88:61 1/18:23) (95:3)195:6) (96:22) (96:24) (97:2) (97:7) (97:12) (97:14) (97:15) 07:2311102:121 (105:3) (105:22) (107:5) (107:21) (109:17) (109:201 (111:17) (111:24) (116:2) (116:5) (116:12) (116:21) (119:15) (121:9) (122:8) (123:9) (123:11) (124:17) (124:22) (127:15) (127:22) (139:11) (141:25) (148:12) (150:12) (151:2)1152:11) NOTARY (149:17) NOTES (90:25) (91:1) (91:6) (150:11) NOSHING (4:23)(33:21) NOTICED (25:25) (97:12) (97:14) NOTIFICATION (78:14) NOVNKSER (19:25) (152:12) NON (5:8) (6:25) (8:13) (12:17) (13:4) (17:18) (23:4) (27:16) (27:18) (33:11)133:13) (35:2) (37:7) (58:3) (59:13) (61:20) (62:10) (62:11) (64:2) (75:21) (81:4) (85:13) (97:25) (100:17) (103:22) (104:5) (104:22) (110:2) (112:19) (116:18) (25:25) (26:1)141:18/ (41:19) 142:11 )165:16) (68:6) (72:S) (72:11) (73:12) :16) (112:3) (115:25) (131:20)1143:16) :18) 66:20) (73:25) (120:8) (120:10) 32:11)132:13) (32:23) (47:23) (63:2) (137:2) + +| | (117:2) (142:9) (147:23) | +|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| IPA | (82:20) | +| NONEER | (3:7) (21:6) (43:12) (78:10)(78:18) (79:7) (90:23) (91:9) (130:16) (131:2) O | +| OATH | 13:10) (149:1) | +| OBJECT | 111:24/ (16:4) (20:1) (20:4) (29:19) (31:2) (31:110 (41:24) (43:23)144:14) (50:4) 151:22) 157:4)157:6) (71:25) (74:11) (88:11) 195:21) (121:12)1123:16) (125:7) (125:12) (125:1711125:22) (127:10) (128:3) (128:10) (129:1) (129:10) (129:15)1129:20) (129:25) (130:5) (130:13) (130:24)1132:8) (133:11)1134:12) (134:17) (135:19) (135:22)1136:17) (137:14) (137:23) 1137:25) (138:8) (138:24) (139:16) (141:2) (141:14) (142:6)1142:14) 1143:311143:15) (144:11) (144:22) (145:3) (145:10) (145:15)1146:14)1146:25) (147:19) | +| OBJECTION | (13:9) (13:11) (13:15) (13 :24) (14:191 (15:13) (16:12) (25:21) (26:22) (28:9) (34:17) (36:3) (36:11)(54:16) (57:14) (60:5) (60:8)160:9) (61:4) (69:7)169:16)171:18) (72:19) (76:4) (77:2) (77:11) (78:2)178:7) (78:11)1713:15) (78:19) (78:24) (79:4) (79:9)179:14)179:19) (80:11) (80:22) (8728)197:22) (97:24) (98:6)198:10) (98:14) (99:2) (99:7) (99:14) (99:22) (100:1) (100:6) (100:7)1128:3) (142:8) | +| OBJECTIONS (98:5) | 129:23) (77:14) (96:24) (97:19) (97:21) (98:1) | +| OBLIGED | (119:19) | +| OBTAIN | (38:4) (39:2) (39:20)139:25) (40:4)169:15) (74:22) | +| OBTAINED | (37:9) (3702) (122:10) | +| OBVIOUSLY | (75:20) (95:23) | +| OCALA | (18:8)118:18) | +| OCCUR | (106:20) | +| OCCURRED (138:7) | (24:7) (58:22) (61:1) (63:8) 1107:1) (127:3) | +| OCTOBER | (1:14) (4:3) 118122)119:2) (68:3) (72:16) (149:11) 1150:18) (151:4) (152:2) 1152:3) | +| OPP | (7:11) (33:3) (45:17) (47:14) (47:15) (47:18) (53:2) 164:15) (39:5) (104:7) (104:17) (106:6) (109:3) (116:12) (116:13) (122:25) (123:3) 1134:21) 1136:20) 1138:12) (14 (146:1) (146:4) (147:7) (148:11) | +| OFFENDER | (6:11)16:16) (7:17) (71:24) (72:7) (72:10 :6) | +| OFFENSE | (12:13) (13:8)113:13)(28:7) (67:5) | +| OFFENSES | (28:11) 1290) 134:6) (34:25) (35:5) I :1 (127:3) (127:7)1127:13) | +| OFFER | (81:17)(139:4) | +| OFFERING | (108:18) | +| OPP-HAND | (33:18) | +| 01PICE (152:10) | (234)1200 (2:14) (2:191 (72:5) (1 152:8) | +| OFFICIAL | (149:10) | +| OKAY | (5:3) (5:6) 15:8) 15:11) 15:13 (5:21) (5:23) | +| (5:25) (6:2) (6:10)16:23)17:2) (7:4) | ) (7:17)17:19) | +| 17:22) (7:25) 18:5) 18:7) 18: | (8:15 :18) (8:21) (9:2) | +| 19:4)(9:11)19:15)19:17/ | 1) 110:113) (10:25) (11:7) | +| (11:10) (11:13) (11:19) (1 :3 | 2:9) 112:23) (13:4)113:7) | +| (13:20)(14:2)114:8) | / 11 )115:3)(15:23)(16:7) | +| (16:11)(17:1)117:3) | 17:1. (17:12) 117:14) (18:15) 118:20) | +| (18:23) (19:2) 119 | (19:171119:23) (20:8) (20:10) | +| (20:22) (21:3)121: | 7)121:20)121:24)(22:5)(22:10) | +| (22:14)(22:1 | 23:9) (23:19) (23:23)123:25) (24:12) | +| (24:22)(24:25) | 5:3 SA) (25:11) (25:18)126:3)126:7) | +| (26:14)126:20) (2 | ) (27:5) (27:6) (27:17) (27:21) (27:23) (28:4) (28:18)128: 3) (2945) (29:7) (29:13) (30:1) (30:9) (30:11) (30:19) (31:17) (31:20) (33:4) (33:25) (34:4) (34:13) (34:15)134:24)135:4) 135:13) (35:17) (35:19) (35:22) (36:21) (37:4) (37:7) (37:9) (37:12) (37:15) (37:18) (37:20) (37:23) (38:4) (38:7) (38:14) (38:20) (39:2) (39:6) (39:9) (39:13)(39:16) (39:22) (39:25) (40:41 (40:10 (40:101 (40:15) (40:25) (41:3) (4105) (42:3) (42:9) 142:13) (42:15) 142:21) (42:25) (43:6) (43:16) (44:6) (44:12) (45:1) (45:6) (45:11) (45:15) (45:21) (45:25) (46:4) (46:9) (46:12)146:15) (46:21) 147:13) (47:17) (47:23) (48:51 (48:7) (48:10) (48:13) 148:17) (48:22) (48:25) (49:6) (49:12) (49:14) (49:16) (49:19) 149:22) (49:25) (50:18) (51:1) (51:13) (52:8)152:13)152:17) (52:21) (52:23) (52:25) (53:3) (53:5)153:7) (53:10) (53:19) 154:3)(54:5) (54:7) (54:13) (54:20)154:22/ 155:1) (55:2) (55:6) (550)155:20) (55:24)156:1) (56:3)1560) (56:7) (56:9) (56:14)156:21) (56:24)15712) (57:10) (57:21)158:10) (58:14)159:18) (60:11) (60:13) (60:16) (60:21) (60:24) | + +| | (61:10) (61:16)161:21) (62:7)162:12) (62:19)162:23) (63:10) (63:15)163:25)164:25) (65:4)165:7) (65:11) (65:20) 166:6)166:15)167:3) (68:5) (641:10) (68:22) 169:10) (69:18) 169:21)170:2) (70:51 (71:7) (71:15) (72:13)173:8) (74:11) (76:9) (76:14) (77:1)(77:3) (77:6) (77:13) (77:21) (77:23) (78:4)179:24/ (80:1) (81:8) (82:1)182:9) (82:13)182:18) 183:4)184:14) (84:17) (84:22) (85:1) (85:11) (85:20) (8503) (86:20) (87:4) (89:8) (89:21) (90:14) (92:21) (92:231 (930) (93:9) 013:121 (93:24) (94:1)195:4)195:5) (95:8) (95:14) (95:17) (96:1) (96:13) (96:19) (97:10) (97:17) (98:7)198:12) (98:24)(99:16)(100:16) (101:5) (101:10) (101:13) (101:19) (101:23) (102:1) (102:4) (102:6) (102:9) (102:11) (102:10 (102117) (102119) (102:23)(103:4) (103:91 (103112) (103:17) (103:20) (104:2) (104:19) (105:11) (105:23) (105:25) (106:3) | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| (106:221 (10734)1107:10) (107:13) (107 | (0 1107:24) (108:2) | +| (108:4) | 1108:11) (108:12) (108:15) (1 8: 8)1108:25) (109:9) | +| (109:14) (109:19) (109:24)(110:24 | )1111:9) (112:1) | +| (112:9) (112:15) (112:221 (113:3 | 3:8 3:25) (114:17) | +| (115:8) (116:6) 1116:16) 1116: | 6:2 116:25) (117:7) | +| (117:11) (117:15) (117:23) (117 | (119 1)(119:5)(119:20) | +| (120:6) (120:10) (120:14) | 0: 7) (120:21) | +| (120:24) (121:2) (122:4) ( | 2:16) (122:24) (123:13) | +| (123:19) (124:2) (124: | 24:20 (124:24) (127:6) | +| (128:15) (128:21) (1 | (135:1 ) (1360) (136:22) (141:23)(148:8) | +| OLD | (8:6) 121:1) | +| | (40 :8) (41:12) (41:14) (42:10) | +| OLDER CSC' | •4) 1 . §)(43:22) (45:5) (46:13) (49:19) (42:18) (43:3) (61:25) (62 (85:17) (940) (95:13) (96:4) (96:16) (96:17)(1 :12) :25)(126:19) .19) (59:1)191:23)193:2) (132:13) (135:15) (152:13) | +| r4 16 4 | .21)138:16) (38:10 (39:2) (39:4) (39:18/ 139:19) | +| S | 5) ( 9:15) (59:19)160:13/ (60:15) (61:16) (61:10 | +| i 16 i | ) (65:21) (68:20) (70:8) (84:5) (86:3)187:12) 09:12) | +| 9: | ) (19:18) (91:6) (920)193:22)1913:12) (98:16) (103:4) | +| 1 t2 :11) (111:22) | (112:3) (112:10) (115:8) (117:12) (121:21) 7:4)(127:6)(132:17)(133:23) (135:17)(136:2) (136:3) (137:16) (137:21) (141:171 (142:2) (147:11) | +| CULT | (12:3) (60:13) (72:23) (87:12) (121;14) (147:11) | +| OPIATES | (55:15)155:16) (55:20) (61:3) | +| OPPORTUNITY | (21:24) (63:20) (74:15) 176:5) (77:15) (97:15) | +| OPPOSED | (127:20) | +| ORAL (147:8) | (102:14) (102:23) (103:1) (138:191 (146:18) (146:21) | +| ORDER | (74:22)175:20) | +| ORDERING | (152:13) (152:14) | +| ORIGINAL | (83:22) (84:2) (152:13) | +| OTHER | (8:7) (8:10) (20:19) (26:3) (34:6) (34:8) (34:24) (35:5) (46:9) (48:10) (48:11) (48:13)152:4) (53:14) (54:7) (54[14)(54:22) (55:11)155:20) 15617)158:22)158:24) (59:5) (60:19) (61:1) (61:3) (61:7) (61:9) (62:9) (70:2) (74:4) (74:7) (76:17) (77:14) (77:19) (82:22) (93:5)193:7) (103:12) (116:6) (117:4) 0113 : 5) 1118:15)1118:22) 1119:17) (121:20) (121:21) (122:10) (123:10) (125:8)1130:16) (136:3) (139:4) (139;5)1139:12) (139:14)1142:3) (142:5)1142:10)1144:18) | +| (144:25)1145:1) | (152:9) | +| OTHERS | (60:16) (60:18)(97:20)1130:9) 1132:13) | +| OTEERNIER | (75:24) | +| OUR | (74:21) (152:8) | +| OUT | (9:8) (23:18) (23:19)131:25) (32:1)146:25/ (51:7) (6505) (66:11 (68:1)170:13) (72:9) (72:10) (72:12) (73:17) (85:15) (126:19) (126:21) (131:22) (143:10) (1470) | +| OVER | (38:16) (39:3) (43:11) (49:16) (49:18) (01:16) (90:21) (93:2) (109:22) (110:1) (110:3)1111:8) (113:5)1113:25) (133:25) (136:24) (137:4) (13900) (143:6) | +| ONN | (100:18)(104:23) (105:15) (114:22) | +| OXYCODONE | (55:18)(57:18) (57:25) (58:8)(58:10) (58:23) | +| PAGE | (3:2)13:7) (30:12) (30:20)130:22) (30:24) (31:7) 132:1)132:3) (43:6) (43:7)143:12) (43:13)143:17) (44:16) (50:12)150:14)150:20 (110:18) (110:22)(110:23) | +| PAGE-LINZ | (151:6) | +| PAGES | (87:25)(91:8) (150:10) (152:10) | +| PAID | (107:15)1126:8) (130:8) (130:10)(130:19) (132:4) 1132:6)1132:9) (139:7) (139:121 (139:22) (142:11) 1144:25) | + +| PALM | (1:2) (2:4) (2:8) (2:13) (7:12) (28:3) (28:13) (67:10) (67:11) (67:23) (85:15) (120:9) (131:1) (144:10) (146:11) | PLEADING | (13:11) (14:10) (66:1) (72:10) (72:11) (73:17) (77:25) | +|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| PANTIES | (104:18) (116:15) (141:7) | PLEASE | (4:9) (5:4) (31:25) (32:24) (77:16) (94:1) (94:10) (134:15) (145:23) (147:2) (152:8) | +| PARAGRAPH | (83:25) (84:4) (84:7) (89:14) (90:5) (94:9) (94:13) (94:19) (96:5) (96:6) (96:7) | PLED | (9:9) (11:21) (14:5) (14:11) (15:16) (16:15) (22:20) (28:16) (28:23) (32:14) (33:17) (34:16) (34:25) (35:3) (35:5) (35:25) (36:5) (36:9) (72:9) (73:14) | +| PARDON | (30:17) (60:6) (71:25) (72:21) | PLURAL | (34:15) | +| PARENT | (133:1) (133:4) | POINT | (31:14) (33:22) (70:8) (105:6) (117:7) (119:5) (134:9) (146:20) | +| PART | (17:12) (69:4) (69:13) (71:22) (72:5) (83:5) (104:22) (119:7) | PONZI | (120:7) (120:18) (120:25) (121:4) | +| PARTIAL | (80:9) (88:11) | POOR | (132:22) | +| PARTICIPATE | (81:9) (137:12) | PORTION | (32:1) | +| PARTICULAR | (8:21) (87:15) (95:25) | POSITION | (75:23) (143:18) | +| PARTICULARLY | (139:13) | POSSESSION | (26:21) (26:24) (27:1) (27:4) (34:10) (34:11) (34:16) (34:20) | +| PARTIES | (4:9) (150:13) (152:14) | POSSIBILITY | (14:25) (67:19) (73:13) (118:23) | +| PARTIES' | (150:14) | POSSIBLY | (72:24) (92:7) (111:12) | +| PARTY | (101:7) (101:21) (102:21) (152:13) | POST | (16:24) (17:1) (17:4) | +| PAST | (21:14) (34:9) (91:19) (108:23) (118:22) | POTENTIAL | (80:8) (80:20) | +| PATHOJUSTICE | (2:21) | PREFER | (5:8) | +| PAUL | (92:21) (92:23) (92:25) | PREGNANT | (54:17) (54:18) (55:22) | +| PAUSE | (60:2) (98:20) (104:9) | PREPARATION | (123:13) | +| PAY | (126:6) (132:11) (132:21) (134:6) (134:20) (135:14) (144:5) (145:19) (145:20) | PREPARE | (74:16) (122:5) (122:18) | +| PAYING | (129:13) (129:19) (129:23) (130:3) (132:2) (135:9) (145:6) (145:14) | PREPARED | (84:18) (85:3) (121:8) (121:23) (122:6) (123:10) | +| PAYMENT | (139:14) | PRESENCE | (129:5) (129:7) (129:9) (142:5) | +| PENALTIES | (151:18) | PRESENT | (4:14) (143:12) | +| PENDENCY | (70:7) | PRESENTED | (131:24) | +| PENDING | (74:21) (77:20) (121:6) (121:24) | PRESENTLY | (77:20) | +| PEOPLE | (45:17) (45:20) (45:23) (45:24) (73:20) (81:15) (85:14) (88:18) (92:4) (109:5) (109:10) (109:14) (109:23) (118:5) (118:22) | PRESS | (144:15) | +| PEOPLE'S | (59:22) (81:19) | PRETTY | (140:17) | +| PERCENT | (34:23) | PREVAIL | (99:10) | +| PERFORM | (52:14) (146:21) | PREVIOUSLY | (97:19) (129:8) | +| PERFORMING | (145:1) (146:18) | PRICES | (114:1) | +| PERHAPS | (29:7) (29:18) (92:19) (101:7) (126:12) | PRIOR | (24:21) (27:17) (28:12) (70:3) (71:20) (78:5) (102:15) (104:25) (105:12) (107:2) (108:25) (129:7) (131:4) (152:12) | +| PERIOD | (53:14) (54:22) (54:23) (55:12) (55:21) (68:14) (68:18) (122:20) (132:3) (132:5) (132:20) (132:25) | PRISON | (6:21) (8:5) (10:23) (11:21) (12:4) (18:5) (54:11) (55:22) (59:14) (59:16) (59:17) (117:1) | +| PERIODS | (28:21) (68:20) | PRISONER | (18:6) (18:11) | +| PERJURY | (151:18) | PRIVATE | (11:9) (11:10) (102:21) | +| PERMISSION | (112:6) (112:12) (113:5) | PRIVATE-PAID | (11:8) | +| PERMIT | (129:14) (129:19) | PRIVILEGE | (121:13) (123:17) (124:18) | +| PERMITTED | (33:5) | PRIVILEGED | (72:2) (88:21) | +| PERSON | (10:22) (23:11) (78:22) (92:6) (114:12) (137:16) (142:5) | PROBABLY | (30:8) (35:15) (37:19) (38:15) (39:3) (40:12) (69:25) (89:5) (92:12) (111:5) (141:8) | +| PERSONALLY | (130:8) (149:7) | PROBATION | (8:16) (14:12) (14:16) (14:21) (14:23) (15:5) (15:8) (15:9) (15:19) (19:24) | +| PERSUADE | (113:22) | PROBLEM | (129:23) | +| PETITIONER | (4:10) | PROBLEMS | (133:15) (148:5) | +| PETTY | (8:16) (15:11) (15:20) (15:21) (15:23) (16:8) (16:15) (20:12) (22:20) | PROCEDURES | (145:7) | +| PHONE | (78:10) (79:7) (112:23) (113:14) (113:21) (113:25) (116:4) (136:5) (136:6) (137:3) (143:5) | PROCESS | (143:21) | +| PHONETIC | (52:3) (70:21) (118:10) | PROFESSIONAL | (120:21) | +| PHYSICAL | (115:14) (115:18) (115:21) (144:8) | PROFFER | (74:19) (75:16) (75:21) (76:24) (82:19) | +| PHYSICALLY | (103:25) | PROGRESS | (141:25) | +| PICK | (51:9) | PROJECTED | (18:20) | +| PICKED | (135:8) | PROMISES | (138:22) | +| PILLS | (45:14) (55:13) (55:14) (86:20) | PROSECUTED | (67:4) (72:25) (73:11) (73:14) | +| PLACE | (1:15) (7:6) (7:20) (19:24) (21:21) (25:9) (25:18) (27:23) (34:7) (34:13) (37:2) (41:15) (41:17) (47:23) (48:15) (102:17) (108:5) (108:8) | PROSECUTION | (68:7) (69:1) (78:1) (108:14) | +| PLACED | (19:23) | PROSECUTOR | (78:21) (88:20) | +| PLACES | (48:8) | PROSECUTORS | (78:5) | +| PLACING | (91:9) | PROSECUTOR'S | (78:10) (78:18) | +| PLAIN | (6:8) | PROSTITUTE | (107:7) (107:11) (115:5) | +| PLAINTIFF | (4:10) (4:14) (83:6) (93:9) (98:8) | PROSTITUTION | (73:18) (107:20) (108:9) | +| PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT | (1:6) (1:13) (2:2) | PROTECTED | (88:21) | +| PLATINUM | (23:23) (24:2) (24:13) (48:2) (48:3) (48:16) (49:20) (50:13) (50:20) (52:2) | PROTECTIVE | (74:22) (75:20) | +| PLAY | (89:24) (90:1) | PROVIDE | (89:20) (90:9) | +| PLAYED | (131:9) | PROVIDED | (88:19) (89:6) (90:8) | +| PLAYING | (47:9) (47:13) | PROVIDING | (144:17) | +| PLEA | (9:21) (10:25) (11:11) (12:13) (13:18) (19:6) (29:2) (29:14) (34:4) (34:9) (69:13) (70:3) (70:12) (71:23) (72:5) (73:10) (78:6) (127:14) (127:20) (127:21) (128:1) (128:8) | PUBLIC | (29:6) (149:17) | +| PLEAD | (9:8) (15:23) (34:2) (34:20) (36:14) (65:25) (66:22) (70:13) (127:15) | PUBLIX | (67:23) (68:2) (72:20) (72:22) (79:3) (79:17) | +| PLEADED | (12:20) (14:7) (31:23) | PUNISH | (100:3) (100:10) | +| | | PURPOSE | (144:1) | +| | | PURPOSES | (97:23) (132:4) (142:12) | +| | | PURSE | (25:19) | +| | | PUT | (30:9) (90:21) (91:6) (100:14) (135:1) (136:23) (137:7) (147:22) | +| | | PUTTING | (12:23) (46:17) | + +| Q | RELEVANCE (74:13) | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| QUESTION (12:2) (12:23) (16:5) (20:2) (20:5) (22:8) (28:1) (29:20) (31:4) (32:11) (32:13) (32:21) (33:7) (33:8) (41:25) (44:7) (44:16) (50:2) (50:5) (50:10) (50:11) (50:16) (50:19) (51:14) (57:5) (59:23) (61:4) (71:15) (72:1) (73:3) (75:4) (88:24) (89:10) (89:16) (94:12) (94:21) (95:22) (98:3) (100:8) (109:25) | RELEVANT (75:3) (75:11) (75:13) (97:8) | +| QUESTION (110:17) | RELIED (99:12) | +| QUESTION (111:3) (111:7) (111:18) (119:16) (119:19) (122:8) (122:11) (123:19) (123:23) (124:2) (124:22) (128:4) | REMARK (92:9) | +| QUESTIONS (22:5) (22:7) (22:10) (30:7) (33:8) (51:23) (63:17) (67:8) (74:8) (74:18) (74:20) (74:24) (75:9) (75:21) (75:25) (76:19) (76:21) (76:23) (96:20) (96:22) (97:1) (97:6) (97:20) (98:1) (124:25) (148:1) | REMEMBER (7:11) (16:18) (16:20) (16:23) (20:8) (20:12) (20:13) (20:15) (20:23) (21:1) (21:14) (21:22) (22:7) (22:9) (22:10) (22:19) (22:23) (22:24) (23:1) (23:5) (24:23) (26:7) (27:3) (27:5) (29:3) (29:10) (29:24) (29:25) (34:14) (35:2) (40:18) (41:15) (41:17) (44:24) (44:25) (46:8) (46:14) (46:24) (47:2) (47:3) (47:5) (47:7) (47:15) (47:19) (47:25) (48:6) (48:10) (48:13) (49:5) (49:6) (49:11) (49:12) (50:6) (51:10) (51:17) (51:18) (52:11) (60:24) (62:10) (62:11) (64:22) (64:24) (66:18) (66:23) (69:2) (69:3) (69:17) (69:19) (69:24) (70:11) (71:10) (71:17) (73:7) (80:4) (81:19) (81:20) (82:7) (87:2) (87:4) (87:7) (87:10) (90:13) (91:22) (92:10) (92:12) (94:4) (94:6) (95:12) (95:14) (96:10) (101:8) (101:15) (101:16) (101:22) (102:18) (102:22) (102:23) (103:22) (105:2) (105:9) (105:22) (107:3) (108:6) (109:24) (110:4) (110:5) (110:16) (111:2) (111:10) (112:19) (113:9) (117:13) (118:7) (119:3) (121:1) (138:1) (139:8) (139:10) (139:21) (140:13) (142:18) | +| QUICK (64:12) (145:24) | REPEATEDLY (125:4) (125:5) (125:9) (125:10) | +| QUINCY (1:16) (4:6) | REPETITION (97:23) | +| R | REPETITIOUS (79:20) | +| RAISE (77:2) (115:24) | REPLY (76:11) | +| RAISED (60:9) (97:19) | REPORT (150:7) | +| RANDI (70:21) (71:7) | REPORTER (3:10) (4:8) (4:11) (150:1) (152:16) | +| REACHED (69:14) | REPORTING (1:18) | +| READ (3:11) (22:1) (22:3) (30:24) (31:7) (31:11) (31:12) (31:24) (31:25) (32:1) (32:6) (32:19) (32:22) (33:5) (33:7) (33:8) (33:14) (33:22) (43:6) (43:11) (43:17) (43:18) (43:24) (50:16) (50:17) (50:18) (50:19) (83:5) (87:11) (89:19) (90:6) (94:18) (120:6) (151:18) (152:9) | REPRESENT (44:2) (93:20) | +| READING (83:11) (83:21) (148:12) (152:8) (152:11) (152:12) | REPRESENTED (29:5) (116:17) (116:21) | +| REAL (58:21) (64:12) (132:11) (141:20) (143:8) (144:14) | REPRESENTING (11:3) | +| REALIZE (99:9) (120:11) | REQUESTED (150:9) | +| REALLY (33:18) (47:8) (51:8) (51:9) (59:2) (61:20) (65:5) (65:10) (76:20) (95:3) (95:12) (105:2) (105:17) (107:5) (128:12) (132:13) (140:17) (147:21) (147:22) | REQUIRED (71:23) (72:6) (72:18) (73:6) (147:17) | +| REASON (15:9) (105:4) (125:8) | REQUIRES (89:16) | +| REASONABLY (75:12) (97:7) | RESOLUTION (80:10) (80:21) | +| REASONS (61:18) (99:6) | RESPOND (119:16) | +| RECALL (22:5) (46:18) (60:11) (69:10) (69:12) (72:15) (79:1) (80:2) (80:6) (80:24) (82:1) (106:19) (126:24) (140:2) (147:14) | RESPONSE (82:16) (88:23) (122:11) | +| RECEIVE (78:13) (82:5) (109:9) | REST (33:14) | +| RECEIVED (19:4) (19:10) (88:22) (111:24) (139:15) (152:13) | RESTITUTION (82:4) | +| RECEIVING (79:1) | RESULT (121:4) | +| RECEIVED (74:7) (80:2) (81:5) (109:9) | RETAINED (17:12) | +| RECEIVED (79:13) (82:5) (109:9) | REVIEW (21:24) (44:17) (87:23) (88:10) (150:8) | +| RECEIVING (79:1) | REVIEWED (82:24) (83:4) (83:6) | +| RECEIVED (74:7) (80:2) (81:5) (109:9) | REVIEWING (19:24) | +| RECEIVED (79:13) (82:5) (109:9) | RICHARDS (72:16) | +| RECEIVED (79:1) | RIDE (135:9) | +| RECORD (1:18) (4:2) (5:3) (20:23) (32:6) (33:2) (33:14) (43:18) (50:18) (64:15) (64:19) (74:21) (75:17) (76:25) (79:22) (80:1) (82:15) (84:11) (89:19) (90:7) (91:7) (97:23) (104:7) (106:6) (106:10) (109:3) (122:25) (123:2) (123:6) (146:1) (146:4) (146:8) (148:11) (150:10) | RIGHT (5:21) (9:16) (10:14) (12:11) (16:18) (25:13) (26:20) (27:16) (28:1) (28:7) (29:12) (29:14) (31:16) (35:2) (35:7) (35:9) (35:24) (36:1) (38:24) (39:22) (40:2) (40:22) (46:12) (51:20) (51:21) (57:24) (58:2) (61:20) (62:5) (62:10) (62:11) (65:15) (65:19) (66:25) (67:6) (68:18) (75:20) (77:9) (83:20) (84:16) (84:19) (86:8) (86:19) (88:10) (92:20) (93:10) (93:17) (93:18) (93:20) (93:21) (100:16) (104:5) (105:10) (105:11) (106:13) (106:18) (106:21) (110:10) (111:14) (113:17) (113:18) (113:20) (114:16) (117:2) (117:16) (117:19) (120:2) (120:5) (124:14) (124:19) (126:2) (127:23) (128:2) (128:11) (135:7) (135:12) (138:15) (141:10) (142:19) (147:23) (147:25) | +| RECORDS (19:24) | RIGHT-HAND (90:23) (91:9) | +| RECRUITED (103:4) | RIGHTS (74:8) (74:17) (74:19) (74:25) (75:10) (76:1) | +| REDACTED (90:5) (90:7) (90:8) | RIGHTS (74:8) (74:17) (74:19) (74:25) (75:10) (76:1) | +| REDACTIONS (95:23) | ROBE (74:2) | +| REDIRECT (3:4) (14:3) | ROBERT (82:2) | +| REFER (91:14) (91:17) | ROOM (63:23) (63:24) (134:25) (136:11) (137:18) (137:21) (139:22) (140:8) (140:20) (141:1) (143:13) (147:5) | +| REFERENCE (44:16) (82:16) (88:5) | ROOT (41:6) (58:12) (58:13) (58:14) | +| REFERENCED (152:7) | ROSENFELDT (117:16) | +| REFERENCES (20:5) | ROSES (40:2) | +| REFERRED (91:20) | ROTHSTEIN (1:8) (117:8) (117:16) (118:16) (119:7) (120:6) (120:17) (120:25) (121:4) (121:22) (122:21) (122:22) (151:4) (152:1) | +| REFERRING (140:8) | ROUTINE (134:9) (134:15) | +| REFLECT (33:2) (82:15) | RUB (138:13) | +| REFRESH (30:4) (50:8) (88:8) (94:7) (94:13) (95:17) | | +| REFRESHES (30:12) (30:24) (31:12) (43:7) (43:20) (90:11) (96:2) | RUB (138:13) | +| REGARDING (97:13) (119:12) (128:16) (134:10) | | +| REGARDING (74:18) (75:25) (90:9) (97:16) | | +| REGISTER (71:23) (72:6) (72:18) (73:6) | | +| REGULARLY (129:23) | | +| RELATE (95:23) | | +| RELATED (110:6) (124:15) | | +| RELATING (74:8) (74:12) (75:9) | | +| RELATIONSHIP (62:13) (119:15) (121:3) | | +| RELATIVE (150:12) (150:14) | | +| RELEASE (18:20) (19:1) | | + +| RULED | (99:11) | (120:8) (134:4) | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| RULES | (96:23) | SELECT | (125:9) | +| | | SELL | (42:13) | +| | S | SELLING | (9:14) (9:15) (9:17) (10:5) (10:10) (12:21) (14:3) | +| SAID | (21:10) (25:24) (29:25) (32:15) (36:5) (40:15) (44:21) | (14:11) (36:7) (36:8) | | +| (46:4) (50:12) (53:24) (57:24) (66:23) (68:8) (74:1) (82:8) | SELLING/TRAFFICKING | (16:22) | | +| (83:5) (89:10) (90:8) (91:19) (92:10) (96:1) (104:1) (104:16) | SENSE | (73:19) (73:22) | | +| (105:3) (116:13) (125:25) (126:11) (136:10) (141:19) | SENT | (152:3) | | +| SAID TO | (92:5) | SENTENCE | (7:2) (8:12) (8:14) (10:13) (10:16) (17:24) | +| SALE | (145:13) | (18:25) (19:3) (19:4) (19:10) (43:14) | | +| SALLY'S | (66:5) (66:6) (68:1) | SENTENCED | (6:10) (7:3) (7:5) (7:17) (11:20) (12:4) (15:16) | +| SALON | (66:16) | (17:25) (18:5) (36:24) | | +| SAME | (13:21) (14:9) (16:12) (28:18) (29:23) (45:20) (45:23) | SEPARATE | (97:12) (97:13) (97:16) (121:10) (123:14) (142:21) | +| (48:15) (48:24) (49:3) (49:4) (57:14) (57:15) (59:12) (67:25) | SEPTEMBER | (80:15) | | +| (77:11) (78:2) (78:7) (78:11) (78:15) (78:19) (78:24) (79:4) | SERIES | (51:23) | | +| (79:9) (79:14) (79:19) (80:11) (80:22) (83:23) (84:7) (96:5) | SERVED | (19:4) (28:4) (28:13) (28:15) (100:13) | | +| (96:6) (96:23) (97:22) (97:24) (98:10) (98:14) (99:2) (99:7) | SERVICES | (70:18) (81:16) (108:19) (144:18) (145:1) (145:13) | | +| (99:14) (99:22) (100:1) (100:6) (117:18) (121:23) (122:2) | SERVING | (8:12) | | +| (122:5) (122:7) (124:6) | SESSION | (141:23) | | +| SARAH | (142:24) (143:12) (143:18) (143:20) | SET | (93:19) (100:11) (113:16) (135:1) (135:24) | +| SAT | (12:17) | SETTLE | (144:5) | +| SAVING | (133:24) | SETTLEMENT | (99:11) | +| SAW | (35:8) (104:11) (107:11) (120:10) | SETTLING | (65:24) | +| SAY | (10:15) (13:2) (13:4) (17:19) (24:16) (34:7) (36:4) | SEVEN | (11:15) (11:16) (11:21) (12:4) (12:7) (51:2) | +| (37:23) (38:10) (40:12) (43:10) (53:18) (55:6) (58:14) | SEVEN-YEAR | (12:17) | | +| (60:16) (77:11) (86:18) (94:22) (105:4) (111:14) (111:17) | SEVERAL | (84:14) (84:15) (137:24) (138:4) (142:22) | | +| (112:8) (113:22) (115:11) (128:5) | SEX | (71:23) (72:7) (72:18) (73:6) (102:11) (102:14) | | +| SAYING | (13:20) (45:22) (69:2) (76:10) (87:3) (94:6) (95:12) | (102:23) (103:1) (112:25) (113:19) (113:23) (129:24) | | +| (96:10) (97:22) (120:2) (127:16) | (138:19) (146:18) (146:21) (147:8) | | | +| SAYS | (31:22) (32:3) (37:24) (38:11) (38:22) (39:23) (44:21) | SEXUAL | (112:23) (129:17) (132:4) (132:6) (137:12) (137:21) | +| (46:25) (94:23) | (138:5) (138:16) (141:25) (142:4) (142:13) (143:14) (144:16) | (145:2) (145:14) | | +| SCAROLA | (2:12) (3:3) (4:12) (13:9) (13:11) (13:15) (13:24) | SEXUALLY | (74:4) (125:4) (125:5) (125:10) (129:19) (130:11) | +| (14:19) (15:13) (16:4) (16:12) (20:1) (20:4) (25:21) (26:22) | (130:23) | SEXUAL-RELATED | (145:13) | +| (28:9) (29:19) (29:23) (30:14) (30:17) (30:19) (30:22) (31:2) | SHACK | (108:11) (108:13) (108:16) | | +| (31:18) (31:21) (31:24) (32:5) (32:11) (32:18) (32:22) (33:2) | SHAME | (152:12) | | +| (33:5) (33:20) (33:23) (34:17) (36:3) (41:24) (44:14) (50:4) | SHARED | (122:16) | | +| (50:7) (50:11) (51:22) (57:4) (57:7) (57:14) (59:24) (60:6) | SHAWNA | (120:24) | | +| (60:9) (63:19) (63:23) (64:1) (64:5) (64:9) (64:13) (69:7) | SHE | (23:10) (43:11) (45:20) (50:12) (50:13) (60:4) (60:7) | | +| (69:16) (70:23) (71:18) (71:25) (72:19) (74:6) (74:11) (75:5) | (66:15) (66:20) (66:23) (67:1) (68:8) (68:17) (70:16) (70:17) | | | +| (75:8) (75:15) (75:18) (76:7) (76:13) (76:15) (76:20) (76:24) | (70:19) (73:13) (74:14) (74:21) (76:5) (77:14) (89:17) (90:8) | | | +| (77:2) (77:4) (77:7) (77:10) (77:18) (77:22) (78:2) (78:7) | (94:16) (94:23) (96:24) (102:1) (104:16) (104:24) (104:25) | | | +| (78:11) (78:15) (78:19) (78:24) (79:4) (79:9) (79:14) (79:19) | (105:2) (105:3) (105:4) (105:9) (105:22) (107:3) (107:10) | | | +| (79:23) (80:11) (80:22) (82:15) (82:21) (83:8) (83:11) | (107:11) (107:14) (107:21) (107:22) (107:25) (108:5) | | | +| (83:14) (83:18) (83:21) (84:5) (84:8) (87:14) (87:19) (87:22) | (108:24) (108:25) (110:17) (111:4) (111:17) (116:13) | | | +| (87:25) (88:9) (88:14) (88:16) (88:20) (88:23) (89:1) (89:8) | (121:13) (121:14) (133:1) (133:13) (133:14) (133:23) | | | +| (89:11) (89:18) (89:22) (90:1) (90:15) (90:18) (90:22) (91:1) | (133:24) (137:10) (140:17) (140:18) (141:18) (141:19) | | | +| (91:3) (91:7) (94:8) (94:10) (94:12) (94:15) (94:18) (94:21) | (141:20) (142:22) (143:4) (143:5) (143:7) (143:8) | | | +| (95:1) (95:4) (95:6) (95:21) (96:5) (96:8) (97:2) (97:6) | SHEET | (3:11) (151:1) | | +| (97:11) (97:18) (98:4) (98:10) (98:14) (98:23) (99:2) (99:7) | SHERIFF | (118:13) | | +| (99:14) (99:17) (99:22) (100:1) (106:2) (106:4) (110:19) | SHE'S | (75:5) (101:4) (104:1) (108:23) (140:17) | | +| (110:24) (111:17) (119:8) (119:10) (119:12) (122:7) (125:2) | SHIP | (18:6) | | +| (125:8) (125:14) (125:20) (125:24) (127:11) (128:6) (128:14) | SHIPPED | (18:9) | | +| (129:3) (129:12) (129:17) (129:22) (130:2) (130:7) (130:15) | SHORT | (143:9) | | +| (130:19) (130:22) (131:3) (132:18) (133:12) (134:14) (135:2) | SHOT | (35:12) (56:1) (74:1) | | +| (135:5) (135:21) (136:7) (136:10) (136:14) (136:18) (136:22) | SHOULD | (100:13) (100:14) (119:15) (122:8) (152:11) | | +| (137:1) (137:19) (138:3) (138:5) (138:14) (139:1) (140:1) | SHOULDN'T | (122:13) | | +| (141:10) (141:22) (142:9) (142:16) (143:12) (143:17) | SHOW | (18:5) (18:12) (134:18) | | +| (144:16) (144:24) (145:5) (145:12) (145:17) (145:22) (146:1) | SHOWGIRLS | (48:2) (48:3) (49:20) (50:13) (50:20) (52:2) | | +| (146:9) (146:16) (147:1) (147:25) (151:21) (152:17) | SHOWING | (88:7) | | +| SCHEME | (120:7) (120:18) (120:25) (121:4) | SIBLINGS | (133:2) | +| SCHOOL | (131:7) (131:11) (131:14) (131:16) | SIDE | (39:8) (39:9) (133:4) (136:3) (136:4) | +| SCHOOLS | (131:21) | SIGN | (3:11) (93:12) (93:22) (152:9) | +| SCOTT | (1:8) (151:3) (152:1) | SIGNED | (65:21) (80:15) (93:17) | +| SEAL | (149:10) | SIGNIFICANCE | (10:12) | +| SEARCY | (2:12) | SIGNIFICANT | (126:22) | +| SEARCYLAW | (2:15) | SIGNING | (66:22) (148:13) (152:8) (152:11) (152:12) | +| SECOND | (94:9) (96:5) (96:6) (96:7) (98:17) (104:8) (122:25) | SIMILAR | (124:6) | +| SECRETARY | (113:14) (113:15) | SIMPLE | (89:10) | +| SECTION | (87:15) (87:19) | SIMPLY | (77:11) (97:21) | +| SEE | (12:6) (14:4) (18:15) (23:5) (24:9) (30:12) (31:12) | SINCE | (17:24) (18:15) (21:25) (31:16) (32:1) (37:5) (53:15) | +| (39:20) (43:7) (43:12) (43:19) (47:20) (50:9) (61:1) (66:4) | SINGLE | (58:19) (58:20) (59:14) (59:15) (60:20) (92:13) (94:22) | | +| (68:3) (69:3) (70:22) (71:7) (86:11) (86:16) (87:9) (92:12) | SINGLE | (133:1) | | +| (94:1) (94:10) (94:19) (96:2) (103:13) (108:18) (123:10) | SIT | (34:6) (34:25) (92:8) | | +| SEEING | (14:9) | SITTING | (21:19) | +| SEEK | (75:19) (79:13) | SIX | (5:20) (27:20) (28:4) (28:13) (28:15) (29:1) (29:8) | +| SEEKING | (77:18) (99:19) (121:7) (121:10) (123:14) (124:5) | | | +| SEEM | (29:21) | | | +| SEEN | (35:10) (35:12) (35:15) (37:5) (71:9) (73:20) (73:25) | | | + +(38:5)1108:23) (132:16) sxnert (140:19) SLEEPING (133:25) SLIM (25:20) (26:11)126:13)149:1) SMOKING (45:9) (45:11) (46:4) (46:6) (53:24) (56:12) (56:15) SOBER (54:8) SOLD (35:25) (36 1) (36:5) SOLE (132:23) (133:8) SOLICITATION (73:18) SOME (37:4)44540) (60:5) (69:5) (82:22) (85:14) (86:5) (91:6) (96:20)196:23) (105:3) (105:6) (106:14) (107:16) (107:19)4108:5)(108:8) (117:7) (119:5) (119:17) (122:10) (126:22) (137:13) (131:33) (132:13) w1®= (23:17) (42:20) (61:21) (65:22) (112:17) (139:211 SOMEONE (23:6) (49:1) (63:13) (76:11) (76:18) (99:5) (112:15) (113:4) (140:20) SOMITHING (9:21) (16:7) (16:16) (24:21) (36:9) (36:14) (40:18) (62:19) (66:34) (66:25/ 032:6) (105:18) (116:3) (141:19) SOMETIME (56:5) SEETINES (103:15)(132:12)(135:14) SOMENEIGUI (39:7) BOX (54:18) SOON (40:21) SORRY (7 s 19) (17:8) (30:15) (38:18) (49:19) (57:21) (63:2) (62:16)170:16) (71:1)184:5) (105:13) (119:6) (128:5) (146:15) SORT (60:5)1106:14) SOUNDS (24:25) (92:20) SOURCE (119:17) (122:8) (122:10) SOUTH 12:3) (2:7) SPEAK (4:23) (76:5) (78:5) (113:4) (139:24) (140:18) SPEAKER (95:25) SPIAEIRS (70:24) SPEAKING (135 s 6) SPECIAL (70:3) (73:15) (73:16) (73:4) (80:2) (81:12)182:2) SPECIELLE (70:21) SPECIFIC (44:15)168:19) (73:3)180:4)197:30)198:3) (127:19) SPECIFICALLY (76:9) (01:3) (122:20) SPECIFIED (139:8) (139:10) SPENDING (27:17) SPENT (27:19) SPORE (48:24)(114:22) SPOT (35:2) SQUAD (131:9) STABLE (134:3) STAFF (118:18)1122:5) STAGS (24:18) (24:22) (25:6) (47: (52:14) (86:5) (86:7) STAIRWELL (134:221(134:23) STAND (37:25) (138:9) START (30:11) (40:6) (43 (45:4)(50:21) (57:19) (57:20) STARTED (40:10)(40:19) 40. ) (40:21) (41:1) (41:7) (45:3) (45:9) (45:11) ) ( 9)156:12) (57:24)458:5) (58:17) (58:20) (59: ( 25:19) (128:21) (131:19) (133:21) (133:25) 7:5) (147:9) STARTING (32:2 STARTS (43: STATE (5:3) ( :17) (52:25) (66:1) (67:11) (67:19) (73:11) (73:14) ( 7) (78:1) (98:1) (121:6) (121:34) (123:15) (124:6) ( 9:3) (149:17) (150:3) STATED (75:23) (97:20) (77:25) (98:4)1151:19) STATEMENT (40:11)107:9) 197:3) STATES (70:6) (81:1) (81:11) METRO (82:6) STATUTORY (12:12) (13:1) 113:2) STAY (75:17) (134:3) (134:7) STEED (18:7) STEALING (14:17) (22:15) (22:25) STENOGRAPHIC (150:11) STENOGRAPHICALLY (150:7) STEP (62:14) STEPFATHER (62:12) STICKS (23:3) STILL (5:17) (63:5) (66:2) (67:4) (73:1) (102:3) (146:12) STOLE (16:8) (16:15)120:13) (20:15)(23:1) STOLEN (20:11) (20:19)122:16) (22:21) 47:9) (47:16) (48:7) + +STOOD (9:24) (13:21) STOP (152:8) STOPPED (147:9) STORE (20:15) (66:16) (67:23) STRAIGHT (139:15) STRAIGHT-A (131:6) STRIKE (71:21) (92:5) (95:8) STRIP (23:32) (46:1) (05:4) (86:4) STRIPPED (47:24) (48:14) (48:19) STRIPPER (24:6) (41:4) (41:12) (41:19) (41:22) (42:1) (42:5) (43:8) (43:21) (44:10) (44:19) (44:25)446:18) (46:23) (47:5) (49:20) (129:13) STRIPPING (52:14) (64:23) STRONG-ARM (6:5)17:15) STRUCK (25:19) STUDENT (131:5)1131:6) SERF (47:1) (51:6) (51: 7) 158: 9:7) (70:18) (81:16) (81:17)182:22) (134:2 (1 :4) (138:13) (143:8) SUBJECT (11I: 23) (64:3) ( SUBMIT (132:6) (145:7) ( SUBMITTING (144:16) 4 SUBSEQUENT (83:19 SUBSTANCES (88:7) SUCH (143:18) SDI (B2:3)( SUED (93: 6) SUPPER ( :13) SUFFICI 2. 1) SUIC (61:23)(62:3) SU s 1:( 72; 2:21) 3) (2:7) (2:18) (152:6) (152:9) 1 (66:5) (66:7) (68:1) (116:18) (122:4)(132:23) (133:8) (86:6)(116:1) (15:2) (15:3) (15:5) 06:10) (22:8) (36:6) (27:13) (30:9) (31:6) (32:9) (43:4) (50:19) (53:19) (57:11) (61:18) (64:8) (64:13)168:33)473:8) (79:211 (81:18) (87:1) (90:17) (90:25) (91:6)193:15)194:20)1106:2) (107:5) (107:21) 1121:16) (121:18) (127:22) (140:14) SURVIVE (134:6) SUMANNEE (5:24) (6:24) SMEAR (4:11) SWITCHING (133:22) SWORN (4:22) (110:8) (149:8) Sit 12:23) (4:7) T TABLE (70:15) (135:1) (135:241 (136:2) (136:15) (136:19) TAKE (16:17) (27:23) (37:2)147:18)453:2) (59:24) (63:20) (63:22)(64:1) (64:10) (70:121 (77:19) (82:9) (84 :1011134 :11) (91:2) (91:5) (98:16) (102:17) (106:1) (109:5) (109:21) (116:12) 1116:13) (134:20) (136:5) (136:20) 1145:24) TAKEN (1:13)11:17) (50:241 (70:12) (131:25) (151:3) (152:2) TAKING (45:14) (45:16)147:8) 147:14)(47:15) (55:20) (58:20) (59:11) (64:10) (134:5) (135:8) (137:3) TALK (18:2) (20:22) (65;2) (68:2) (70:20)183:25)198:10) (100:22) (103:17) (105:18) (112:25) (120:24) TAIJXD (46:9) (56:11) (102:5) (103:23) (107:8) (129:4) TALICENG (12:11) (12:12) (23:14) (23:16) (49:11 (50:20) (65:1)484:23) 034:25) (85:2) (114:15) (117:15) (117:18) (121:9) (123:11)1123:20) TALL (140:18) TALLAHASSEE (1:19) 1150:19) (152:9) TAMPA I9:31 TATTOO (37:15) (37:20) (38:7) (38:20)(38:22) (39:6) (39:13) (39:19) (39:22) (40:2) TATTOOS (37:7)137:9) (37:12) (38:17) (38:18)(39:4)139:18) (43:22) (42:23) (43:1) (45:19) (45:21) (98:25) (100:22) (100:25) (101:23) (102:7) (102:11) (102:14) (103:2) (103:4) (103:13) (103:16) (106:15) (107:6) (107:15) (107:19) (107:24) (108:15) (108:19) (116:9) (116:11) (120:241(122:6) (135:13) (135:14) (135:151 (137:16) (142:18)1142:20) (133:25) (134:3) (134:4) TAYLOR (24:24) (25:7) (25:14) (48:10) (114:25) + +| TEETH | (14:13) | (92:9) | (92:10) | (92:18) | (92:20) | (93:9) | (93:13) | (93:14) | (94:11) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|-------------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|---------|----------|---------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|----------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------------|--------|-------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|----------|---------|------------|-------|--------|--------|-------|--------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------|--------|--------|--------|-------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|--------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--------|--------|--------| +| TELEPHONE | (112:20) | (94:4) | (94:6) | (94:8) | (94:10) | (94:15) | (94:16) | (94:18) | (94:22) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TELL | (10:7) | (13:12) | (14:2) | (17:3) | (22:24) | (52:18) | (59:9) | (94:23) | (95:10) | (95:15) | (95:22) | (95:23) | (96:11) | (96:21) | (96:23) | (96:24) | (97:11) | (97:19) | (97:21) | (98:5) | (99:9) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| (61:10) | (65:9) | (67:1) | (71:4) | (77:25) | (78:22) | (94:25) | (95:10) | (96:13) | (96:21) | (96:24) | (97:11) | (97:19) | (97:21) | (98:5) | (99:9) | (99:11) | (99:24) | (100:7) | (100:19) | (101:10) | (101:11) | (101:22) | (102:9) | (102:13) | (102:17) | (102:25) | (103:12) | (104:1) | (104:4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| (104:25) | (110:8) | (120:13) | (128:12) | (131:25) | (137:2) | (141:4) | (141:5) | (141:8) | (141:21) | (143:2) | (147:2) | (104:13) | (104:15) | (104:16) | (104:22) | (104:24) | (104:25) | (105:3) | (105:7) | (105:13) | (105:18) | (105:20) | (106:14) | (106:19) | (106:20) | (106:22) | (107:11) | (107:18) | (108:5) | (108:6) | (108:7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TELLING | (19:17) | (64:22) | (66:18) | (67:8) | (68:25) | (75:24) | (76:11) | (87:4) | (94:4) | (95:14) | (105:13) | (110:11) | (108:8) | (108:15) | (109:15) | (109:17) | (109:23) | (109:24) | (110:2) | (110:3) | (110:8) | (110:14) | (111:7) | (111:10) | (111:11) | (111:13) | (111:14) | (111:18) | (111:22) | (112:7) | (112:10) | (112:16) | (112:17) | (112:18) | (112:24) | (113:8) | (113:12) | (113:22) | (114:1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TERMINATED | (121:3) | (115:2) | (115:3) | (115:14) | (116:6) | (116:15) | (116:16) | (116:17) | (116:18) | (116:21) | (117:1) | (117:7) | (117:11) | (117:14) | (117:20) | (117:23) | (118:5) | (119:5) | (119:6) | (119:13) | (119:16) | (119:17) | (119:19) | (120:2) | (120:10) | (120:11) | (120:15) | (120:18) | (121:8) | (121:13) | (121:14) | (121:17) | (121:22) | (121:23) | (121:24) | (122:4) | (122:6) | (122:7) | (122:8) | (122:10) | (122:11) | (123:9) | (123:11) | (123:17) | (124:6) | (124:17) | (124:16) | (124:17) | (124:20) | (125:9) | (125:10) | (125:15) | (125:25) | (126:1) | (126:16) | (126:11) | (126:18) | (126:24) | (127:3) | (127:17) | (127:23) | (128:6) | (128:11) | (128:17) | (128:21) | (128:24) | (130:8) | (130:16) | (131:23) | (131:24) | (132:3) | (132:5) | (132:10) | (132:11) | (132:15) | (132:25) | (133:9) | (133:19) | (134:5) | (134:15) | (136:6) | (136:11) | (137:4) | (137:13) | (138:13) | (139:9) | (139:10) | (139:14) | (139:18) | (140:7) | (140:10) | (140:24) | (141:5) | (141:9) | (141:16) | (141:18) | (141:19) | (141:24) | (142:2) | (142:21) | (143:2) | (143:8) | (143:19) | (143:20) | (144:20) | (145:7) | (145:8) | (145:19) | (146:10) | (146:11) | (146:12) | (146:17) | (146:22) | (147:2) | (147:9) | (147:11) | (147:14) | (147:16) | (149:7) | (150:6) | (150:8) | (150:9) | (150:12) | (151:18) | (151:19) | (152:12) | THAT'S | (5:25) | (9:7) | (9:10) | (10:6) | (10:9) | (12:2) | (12:10) | (18:12) | (19:11) | (25:22) | (25:23) | (25:25) | (26:12) | (28:15) | (33:12) | (33:20) | (35:14) | (36:11) | (36:2) | (36:4) | (36:7) | (37:6) | (43:14) | (44:4) | (44:15) | (46:12) | (47:12) | (48:24) | (51:14) | (55:23) | (56:8) | (58:12) | (61:18) | (66:3) | (73:23) | (74:2) | (81:11) | (81:14) | (81:18) | (88:23) | (90:10) | (90:24) | (94:21) | (97:2) | (98:19) | (101:15) | (105:15) | (105:18) | (118:23) | (119:21) | (122:16) | (124:24) | (131:10) | (131:18) | (132:16) | (133:24) | (137:8) | (140:14) | (148:8) | THE | (1:1) | (1:17) | (1:18) | (2:2) | (2:11) | (4:2) | (4:3) | (4:4) | (4:6) | (4:7) | (4:8) | (4:9) | (4:10) | (4:11) | (4:15) | (4:23) | (4:25) | (5:3) | (5:25) | (6:21) | (6:24) | (7:4) | (7:10) | (7:11) | (8:12) | (9:24) | (10:4) | (10:21) | (10:22) | (11:19) | (11:20) | (12:5) | (12:6) | (12:11) | (12:12) | (12:13) | (12:15) | (12:16) | (12:19) | (13:2) | (13:1) | (13:7) | (13:8) | (13:10) | (13:12) | (13:13) | (13:14) | (13:21) | (13:22) | (14:4) | (14:7) | (14:9) | (15:9) | (15:17) | (15:19) | (15:21) | (16:5) | (16:10) | (16:22) | (17:1) | (17:3) | (18:24) | (19:2) | (19:3) | (19:6) | (19:9) | (19:14) | (19:20) | (19:23) | (19:24) | (20:1) | (20:4) | (20:5) | (20:23) | (21:6) | (21:14) | (23:6) | (23:12) | (23:13) | (23:14) | (24:3) | (24:7) | (24:12) | (24:15) | (24:20) | (24:24) | (25:3) | (25:6) | (25:9) | (25:14) | (25:15) | (25:9) | (25:14) | (25:18) | (25:22) | (25:24) | (26:1) | (26:9) | (26:11) | (26:17) | (27:14) | (27:18) | (27:24) | (28:1) | (28:12) | (28:13) | (28:18) | (29:19) | (29:24) | (29:25) | (30:2) | (30:4) | (30:7) | (30:12) | (31:7) | (31:9) | (31:10) | (31:14) | (31:17) | (31:22) | (31:24) | (32:3) | (32:6) | (32:7) | (32:11) | (32:13) | (32:22) | (33:1) | (33:2) | (33:3) | (33:6) | (33:7) | (33:8) | (33:12) | (33:14) | (33:16) | (33:23) | (34:6) | (34:9) | (34:14) | (34:15) | (34:18) | (35:2) | (35:7) | (35:10) | (35:11) | (35:12) | (35:14) | (36:4) | (36:22) | (36:24) | (37:2) | (37:5) | (37:10) | (37:12) | (37:15) | (38:18) | (38:24) | (39:4) | (41:6) | (41:24) | (42:1) | (42:4) | (42:19) | (42:25) | (43:12) | (43:13) | (43:17) | (43:18) | (44:2) | (44:6) | (45:11) | (45:17) | (45:18) | (45:20) | (45:23) | (46:9) | (46:24) | (46:25) | (47:7) | (47:18) | (47:23) | (48:6) | (48:15) | (48:24) | (49:1) | (49:3) | (49:4) | (49:10) | (49:12) | (49:14) | (49:17) | (49:23) | (50:4) | (50:6) | (50:18) | (51:11) | (51:12) | (51:23) | (52:3) | (52:11) | (52:17) | (54:9) | (54:14) | (54:17) | (54:18) | (56:9) | (56:10) | (56:14) | (56:25) | (57:2) | (57:3) | (57:4) | (57:9) | (57:11) | (57:15) | (57:18) | (58:12) | (58:16) | (58:17) | (58:20) | (58:25) | (59:12) | (59:19) | (59:23) | (60:2) | (60:11) | (60:13) | (60:15) | (61:16) | (61:18) | (63:10) | (63:17) | (63:22) | (63:23) | (63:25) | (64:3) | (64:7) | (64:11) | (64:14) | (64:15) | (64:16) | (64:18) | (64:19) | (64:22) | (64:25) | (65:20) | (67:6) | (67:17) | (67:19) | (67:25) | (68:2) | (68:19) | (69:4) | (69:10) | (69:12) | (69:13) | (69:15) | (69:17) | (69:19) | (70:14) | (70:15) | (70:16) | (70:17) | (70:19) | (70:13) | (70:17) | (70:19) | (71:15) | (71:20) | (71:21) | (71:22) | (71:25) | (72:9) | (72:17) | (72:20) | (72:22) | (72:23) | (72:24) | (73:5) | (73:7) | (73:10) | (73:12) | (73:13) | (73:15) | (73:16) | (73:19) | (73:20) | (73:21) | (73:22) | (73:23) | (73:24) | (73:25) | (74:1) | (74:4) | (74:7) | (74:10) | (74:24) | (74:15) | (75:9) | (75:10) | (75:20) | (75:22) | (75:23) | (75:25) | (76:15) | (76:18) | (76:20) | (77:10) | (77:19) | (77:25) | (78:17) | (78:22) | (79:6) | (80:13) | (80:14) | (81:4) | (81:14) | (81:16) | (81:17) | (81:19) | (81:20) | (82:3) | (82:6) | (82:9) | (82:11) | (82:13) | (82:15) | (82:16) | (82:25) | (83:5) | (83:14) | (83:16) | (83:18) | (83:25) | (84:12) | (84:24) | (85:2) | (85:3) | (85:9) | (85:11) | (85:12) | (85:13) | (86:3) | (86:5) | (86:7) | (87:1) | (87:5) | (87:20) | (88:21) | (89:2) | (89:5) | (89:7) | (89:11) | (89:14) | (89:20) | (89:22) | (89:23) | (90:2) | (90:8) | (90:13) | (91:17) | (91:19) | (91:25) | (92:2) | (92:5) | (92:6) | + +THEFT + +TIMES + +(77:4) (77:19) (77:20) (77:24) (78:4) (78:9) (78:18) (78:21) + (79:2) (79:11) (79:17) (79:25) (80:4) (80:8) (80:10) (80:13) + (80:18) (80:19) (80:20) (80:21) (81:2) (81:4) (81:11) (81:13) + (81:14) (81:16) (81:18) (81:19) (81:20) (81:21) (81:22) + (82:3) (82:13) (82:15) (82:16) (82:18) (82:19) (82:20) + (82:24) (83:2) (83:6) (83:7) (83:12) (83:14) (83:16) (83:21) + (83:23) (83:24) (84:1) (84:2) (84:6) (84:7) (84:8) (84:11) + (84:19) (84:21) (84:25) (85:3) (85:4) (85:15) (87:4) (87:9) + (87:11) (87:19) (87:22) (87:25) (88:3) (88:5) (88:6) (88:7) + (88:9) (88:10) (88:15) (88:22) (89:2) (89:5) (89:9) (89:16) + (89:17) (89:18) (89:19) (90:3) (90:5) (90:6) (90:7) (90:18) + (90:23) (91:7) (91:9) (93:3) (93:19) (93:22) (93:24) (94:4) + (94:7) (94:9) (94:11) (94:16) (94:21) (94:25) (95:10) (95:18) + (95:19) (95:22) (96:5) (96:7) (96:8) (96:10) (96:20) (96:22) + (96:23) (96:25) (97:1) (97:6) (97:8) (97:13) (97:16) (97:18) + (97:21) (97:23) (97:24) (97:25) (98:2) (98:4) (98:9) (98:13) + (98:20) (98:25) (99:5) (99:6) (99:10) (99:12) (99:20) (99:21) + (100:4) (100:8) (100:11) (100:14) (100:19) (101:21) (103:4) + (103:10) (103:22) (104:6) (104:7) (104:9) (105:14) (105:17) + (106:1) (106:3) (106:5) (106:6) (106:7) (106:9) (106:10) + (106:22) (108:6) (108:11) (108:23) (109:3) (110:1) (110:6) + (110:8) (110:11) (110:19) (111:11) (111:18) (112:20) + (113:14) (113:25) (116:1) (116:2) (116:3) (116:5) (116:8) + (116:9) (116:20) (116:25) (117:8) (117:12) (117:15) (117:18) + (117:25) (118:5) (118:13) (118:15) (118:16) (118:20) (119:7) + (119:12) (119:14) (119:20) (119:23) (120:6) (120:8) (120:10) + (120:17) (120:25) (121:4) (121:9) (121:13) (121:21) (121:23) + (122:2) (122:5) (122:8) (122:13) (122:20) (122:21) (122:25) + (123:1) (123:2) (123:3) (123:5) (123:6) (123:11) (123:13) + (123:15) (123:17) (123:18) (123:19) (123:22) (124:1) (124:4) + (124:6) (124:11) (124:14) (124:16) (124:18) (124:19) + (124:22) (124:23) (124:24) (125:7) (125:9) (125:12) (125:13) + (125:17) (125:18) (125:22) (125:23) (126:8) (126:11) + (126:12) (126:17) (126:20) (126:21) (127:1) (127:10) + (127:13) (127:17) (127:25) (128:3) (128:4) (128:5) (128:7) + (128:10) (128:11) (128:12) (128:17) (129:1) (129:2) (129:4) + (129:7) (129:9) (129:10) (129:11) (129:15) (129:16) (129:20) + (129:21) (129:25) (130:1) (130:5) (130:6) (130:7) (130:13) + (130:14) (130:16) (130:18) (130:24) (130:25) (131:8) (131:9) + (131:17) (131:24) (132:1) (132:5) (132:8) (132:9) (132:15) + (132:19) (132:23) (133:8) (133:11) (133:13) (133:16) + (133:19) (134:12) (134:13) (134:14) (134:17) (134:18) + (134:23) (135:4) (135:9) (135:19) (135:20) (135:22) (135:23) + (135:24) (136:1) (136:3) (136:9) (136:11) (136:13) (136:14) + (136:16) (136:17) (136:18) (136:19) (136:20) (136:23) + (137:6) (137:7) (137:9) (137:10) (137:12) (137:13) (137:14) + (137:15) (137:17) (137:18) (137:20) (137:21) (137:23) + (137:24) (137:25) (138:1) (138:4) (138:8) (138:9) (138:24) + (138:25) (139:12) (139:14) (139:15) (139:16) (139:17) + (139:21) (139:22) (140:2) (140:7) (140:8) (140:11) (140:20) + (141:1) (141:2) (141:3) (141:4) (141:14) (141:15) (141:17) + (141:19) (142:2) (142:6) (142:7) (142:8) (142:14) (142:15) + (142:21) (142:24) (143:3) (143:4) (143:5) (143:13) (143:15) + (143:16) (143:18) (143:19) (143:23) (143:24) (143:1) + (144:11) (144:12) (144:21) (144:22) (144:23) (144:24) + (145:3) (145:4) (145:7) (145:10) (145:11) (145:15) (145:16) + (145:18) (146:1) (146:3) (146:4) (146:5) (146:7) (146:8) + (146:14) (146:25) (147:5) (147:11) (147:16) (147:18) + (147:19) (147:20) (148:2) (148:9) (148:10) (148:11) (148:12) + (148:13) (149:6) (150:7) (150:8) (150:9) (150:13) (150:14) + (150:15) (150:16) (151:3) (151:19) (152:7) (152:9) (152:10) + (152:11) (152:12) (152:13) + +**THEFT** (8:17) (14:16) (14:21) (14:24) (15:6) (15:8) (15:10) + (15:11) (15:20) (15:21) (15:23) (16:9) (16:15) (19:23) + (20:12) (22:21) (27:22) (27:24) (34:2) + +**THEFTS** (28:14) (28:16) (28:19) + +**THEIR** (60:12) (60:24) (67:20) (121:3) + +**THEM** (16:19) (28:19) (37:14) (45:24) (54:25) (59:13) + (60:21) (75:22) (76:24) (76:25) (77:17) (111:24) (113:13) + (128:19) (130:12) (130:23) (141:4) (141:5) (141:9) (141:12) + (141:20) + +**THEMSELVES** (4:9) + +**THEN** (4:10) (7:8) (18:6) (18:8) (25:11) (31:16) (32:11) + (32:13) (44:16) (54:25) (58:19) (58:20) (77:16) (81:8) + (84:11) (97:5) (111:14) (113:16) (119:18) (122:14) (124:2) + (124:16) (131:20) (131:21) (134:4) (134:5) (136:14) (147:9) + +**THEORY** (75:1) + +**THERAPY** (81:17) + +**THERE** (5:13) (7:10) (15:15) (16:19) (21:19) (22:7) (24:10) + (25:12) (30:6) (31:4) (35:4) (40:18) (41:18) (42:5) (42:23) + (44:21) (44:24) (44:25) (46:24) (47:1) (47:2) (47:8) (48:1) + (48:5) (48:15) (49:23) (50:21) (50:23) (52:10) (52:21) + (53:14) (53:18) (54:8) (60:18) (61:7) (61:9) (61:21) (62:9) + (62:14) (66:2) (66:20) (66:21) (68:6) (68:25) (70:17) (73:17) + (76:17) (77:8) (86:6) (86:9) (86:11) (87:14) (89:23) (95:1) + (102:6) (103:13) (103:16) (105:1) (110:2) (110:13) (111:24) + (112:3) (112:12) (112:17) (112:22) (115:6) (115:14) (115:25) + (116:3) (116:8) (116:9) (116:20) (118:6) (118:20) (118:22) + (118:23) (119:1) (119:2) (119:3) (120:18) (125:8) (125:15) + (125:25) (126:18) (127:4) (127:12) (127:23) (128:6) (128:24) + (131:23) (132:10) (133:21) (134:7) (134:9) (134:20) (134:22) + (135:2) (135:9) (135:17) (135:18) (137:11) (137:16) (138:5) + (138:15) (138:18) (139:13) (139:17) (139:18) (139:19) + (139:20) (141:15) (141:23) (142:3) (142:10) (143:6) (143:11) + (143:16) (146:20) + +**THERE ARE** (91:1) + +**THEREFORE** (97:14) + +**THERE'S** (14:25) (31:16) (51:5) (51:6) (60:19) (75:21) + (89:25) (111:11) (111:12) (125:18) (128:11) (130:25) (131:1) + +**THESE** (18:13) (45:15) (46:8) (59:22) (63:17) (67:10) (88:18) + +**THEY** (12:18) (17:25) (18:1) (18:4) (18:5) (18:6) (18:12) + (24:19) (25:5) (33:18) (42:16) (59:18) (59:22) (60:23) + (65:23) (66:4) (66:21) (67:7) (67:8) (67:21) (69:13) (70:19) + (72:8) (72:23) (73:10) (81:15) (81:16) (82:6) (85:13) (85:15) + (97:20) (111:23) (130:10) (141:3) (141:16) (141:17) + +**THING** (58:21) + +**THINGS** (25:24) (51:9) (59:6) (59:12) (77:10) (147:16) + +**THINK** (10:21) (11:15) (17:20) (22:15) (24:18) (30:16) + (30:18) (34:22) (35:19) (42:16) (46:19) (48:1) (49:4) (50:2) + (51:15) (61:20) (62:4) (63:16) (66:12) (67:10) (67:20) (68:8) + (73:23) (77:16) (79:24) (81:14) (82:11) (82:19) (89:16) + (89:24) (91:6) (101:11) (101:15) (102:12) (105:8) (108:1) + (110:2) (120:8) (120:12) (121:5) (131:10) (139:9) + +**THIRD** (84:9) + +**THIS** (4:15) (7:19) (17:18) (17:19) (18:10) (22:16) (27:17) + (31:2) (31:14) (33:22) (45:25) (47:11) (50:19) (50:24) (51:7) + (54:11) (54:12) (55:11) (55:21) (59:16) (59:17) (66:16) + (67:9) (71:7) (74:14) (75:5) (75:19) (77:22) (78:23) (88:1) + (88:16) (89:1) (90:15) (91:8) (94:12) (96:23) (97:9) (97:11) + (105:9) (110:3) (110:6) (110:16) (111:3) (117:1) (123:9) + (123:17) (123:21) (124:12) (131:23) (132:3) (132:20) + (134:21) (134:25) (142:18) (147:18) (148:9) (149:10) + (150:18) (152:13) + +**THOSE** (14:6) (17:6) (29:5) (29:8) (34:13) (37:9) (52:13) + (59:9) (61:10) (64:4) (74:13) (74:21) (75:10) (93:22) (97:18) + (111:22) (112:23) (113:21) (121:2) (125:21) (126:3) (126:11) + (127:6) (127:12) (130:16) (132:21) (140:24) (141:11) + +**THOUGH** (23:12) (28:21) (29:4) (34:15) (47:5) (101:9) + (102:5) (112:4) + +**THOUGHT** (35:4) (49:3) (51:8) (66:2) (67:12) (74:2) (84:24) + +**THREATEN** (115:18) + +**THREE** (10:19) (10:20) (10:22) (11:18) (15:17) (19:5) + (28:14) (28:16) (28:18) (28:21) (28:23) (29:8) (29:18) + (32:15) (32:17) (33:10) (59:14) (60:16) (70:1) (89:11) + (89:13) (89:17) (93:1) (111:5) (126:12) + +**THRESSOME** (139:23) (140:9) + +**THREE-YEAR** (19:3) + +**THROUGH** (43:7) (51:6) (54:13) (54:25) (92:15) (101:6) + (101:9) (134:24) (150:10) (152:10) + +**THURSDAY** (4:3) + +**TIME** (1:14) (4:3) (6:21) (19:18) (20:23) (26:9) (27:14) + (27:17) (27:18) (28:18) (28:21) (28:23) (30:2) (31:4) (31:14) + (34:16) (34:21) (35:7) (37:4) (37:5) (42:25) (45:11) (45:18) + (46:17) (52:11) (54:8) (54:9) (54:12) (54:14) (54:22) (54:23) + (55:12) (55:21) (56:9) (56:14) (56:24) (57:2) (63:20) (64:7) + (64:14) (64:18) (68:10) (68:14) (68:18) (68:19) (70:6) + (71:22) (72:23) (77:24) (78:5) (78:23) (80:7) (80:14) (81:14) + (81:18) (82:11) (86:8) (102:6) (103:10) (103:14) (105:14) + (105:17) (106:5) (106:9) (106:23) (112:3) (112:10) (116:9) + (116:20) (116:23) (117:5) (117:12) (121:17) (122:20) (123:1) + (123:5) (124:16) (127:4) (132:3) (132:5) (132:20) (132:25) + (133:16) (134:5) (134:9) (135:18) (137:17) (139:18) (141:18) + (143:6) (143:11) (145:19) (146:3) (146:7) (146:12) (146:20) + (147:11) (147:12) (148:10) (152:11) + +**TIMES** (21:3) (21:6) (21:10) (22:11) (27:8) (29:18) (30:25) + (31:5) (31:13) (31:23) (32:7) (32:15) (32:17) (33:10) (44:22) + +| (47:3) (53:7) (54:7) (69:21) (69:23) (69:24) (69:25) (70:1)
(70:22) (71:7) (71:9) (79:16) (86:2) (91:20) (92:25) (93:1)
(93:5) (93:7) (103:1) (103:12) (113:8) (113:9) (115:25)
(116:1) (116:3) (126:18) (132:14) (137:19) (138:2) (139:17)
(141:4) (141:16) | UNDRESSED (53:2) (135:25)
UNFORTUNATELY (147:17)
UNH-UNH (81:23) (101:18) (108:3) (109:13)
UNINTELLIGIBLE (70:24)
UNITED (70:6) (81:1) (81:11)
UNLESS (137:16)
UN-REDACTED (88:17) (89:2)
UNTIL (41:7) (54:10) (57:20) (61:24) (137:10)
UPON (99:17)
UPSTAIRS (135:23)
USAGE (40:22)
USE (5:8) (5:10) (24:24) (31:3) (48:7) (58:11) (58:23)
(58:25) (61:2) (61:8) (61:17) (62:10) (63:13) (64:11) (84:1)
(84:2) (87:6) (88:6) (88:11) (108:11) (114:22) (114:25)
(115:18) (115:21) (128:24)
USED (25:1) (34:15) (48:11) (49:15) (82:10) (90:6) (90:7)
(115:14)
USEFUL (104:5)
USER (54:15)
USING (24:15) (24:16) (24:22) (25:3) (40:6) (40:10) (40:19)
(40:21) (41:1) (41:3) (41:5) (45:3) (45:4) (49:12) (49:17)
(53:16) (53:19) (55:21) (57:2) (57:13) (76:18) (86:24)
(90:12) (128:21)
USUALLY (135:17) | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TODAY (4:2) (34:6) (35:1) (41:11) (92:8) (127:2)
TODAY'S (54:10)
TOGETHER (8:1) (103:9) (135:15)
TOLD (9:24) (10:4) (10:9) (11:23) (12:7) (12:10) (13:7)
(19:17) (36:1) (63:3) (65:21) (65:23) (66:20) (67:17) (68:6)
(68:17) (69:13) (70:16) (71:20) (71:22) (72:4) (72:8) (72:11)
(72:17) (72:24) (73:4) (73:7) (73:9) (73:10) (73:12) (73:13)
(81:14) (92:5) (94:16) (95:19) (95:20) (96:3) (96:17) (105:7)
(105:9) (105:20) (105:22) (106:20) (116:11) (120:13) (126:5)
(128:21) (146:10) (146:17) (147:9)
TOO (39:5) (49:15) (54:17) (62:5) (142:9)
TOOK (7:5) (7:20) (12:20) (12:22) (16:16) (16:20) (18:1)
(19:24) (21:21) (25:9) (25:18) (25:23) (30:7) (34:7) (34:13)
(89:5) (104:16) (109:15) (109:23) (110:17) (111:2) (111:3)
(111:5) (111:11) (111:13) (111:14) (111:19) (111:22) (126:1)
TOP (43:17) (53:2) (134:6)
TOTAL (28:14)
TOUCH (138:11) (138:12)
TOUCHING (52:21) (141:25)
TOWEL (136:24)
TOWELS (135:1)
TRAFFICKING (7:23) (8:16) (8:18) (8:22) (8:24) (9:5) (9:9)
(9:13) (9:16) (9:17) (10:10) (10:11) (11:1) (11:14) (11:20)
(12:15) (12:21) (14:11) (15:19) (19:15) (19:20) (35:24)
(36:6) (36:20)
TRANSCRIPT (150:9) (150:10) (151:2) (152:7) (152:9)
(152:10) (152:12)
TRANSPIRED (141:19)
TRAUMA (100:19)
TRAUMATIC (58:16) (58:22) (59:2) (59:5) (61:1) (61:16)
(62:5) (62:8) (62:9) (63:5) (63:10) (63:16)
TRAUMATIZED (141:17)
TRAVEL (114:20)
TRIAL (25:23)
TRICKY (63:18)
TRIED (46:25) (89:20) (90:9)
TRIP (107:15) (107:18)
TROUBLE (127:4)
TRUE (25:23) (25:24) (80:13) (150:10) (151:19)
TRUMPET (131:9) (131:10)
TRUTH (4:23) (4:24) (110:8) (110:11)
TRY (16:24) (147:9)
TRYING (51:9) (134:6)
TURNED (50:22) (53:15) (125:16)
TURNING (94:24)
TWICE (34:22) (132:12)
TWO (18:6) (18:8) (24:20) (24:21) (25:11) (38:5) (39:18)
(60:18) (60:19) (73:17) (74:1) (76:8) (87:25) (93:7) (102:10)
(121:2) (126:12) (132:15) (141:20)
TWO-AND-A-HALF (19:5)
TWO-THOUSAND (58:2)
TYPE (131:5)
TYPES (134:2)
TYPICALLY (134:15) | V | +| U | WACTED (99:13)
VAGUE (57:7)
VARIED (139:15)
VAST (126:11)
VERY (51:21) (62:8) (94:17)
VERY-SHORT (89:14)
VICTIM (70:17) (70:18)
VICTIMS (73:17) (74:4) (81:16) (83:7)
VICTIMS' (74:8) (74:16) (74:19) (74:25) (75:10) (76:1)
(78:14) (99:12)
VIDEO (1:11) (151:3) (152:2)
VIDEOGRAPHER (2:22) (4:2) (4:7) (64:7) (64:14) (64:18)
(106:5) (106:9) (123:1) (123:5) (146:3) (146:7) (148:9)
VIDEOTAPE (131:24)
VILLAFANIA (79:2) (81:1) (81:9)
VILLAFANIA'S (79:7)
VIOLATION (8:16) (14:12) (15:19)
VIOLENCE (115:21)
VIOLENT (103:25)
VISIT (63:23) (107:2) (107:24)
VISITING (25:8) (40:23)
VOICE (115:24)
VOID (99:11) | +| U | W | +| UH-HUH (43:3) (55:11) (93:16)
ULTIMATELY (144:5)
UM-HMM (12:25) (17:21) (19:8) (20:18) (24:14) (39:10)
(40:17) (45:7) (53:21) (53:25) (56:16) (56:18) (56:23) (60:1)
(60:17) (63:7) (81:10) (85:6) (85:10) (94:11) (96:9) (100:10)
(101:10) (104:25) (108:17) (116:10) (124:11) (130:18)
(133:7) (135:10) (136:13) (136:16) (140:22)
UNCOMFORTABLE (62:15) (63:3)
UNDER (9:7) (12:19) (25:6) (25:14) (49:16) (66:3) (74:2)
(111:15) (111:19) (130:10) (139:14) (151:18)
UNDERAGE (48:20) (109:23) (111:13) (111:23) (126:13)
(126:15) (142:12)
UNDERSIGNED (149:6)
UNDERSTAND (18:3) (51:4) (58:15) (66:1) (67:15) (73:8)
(73:15) (76:3) (81:20) (93:14)
UNDERSTANDING (9:19) (11:19) (12:3) (67:3)
UNDRESS (52:25) | WAIT (30:19) (55:4) (135:25) (137:5) (137:9)
WAITRESS (133:14)
WAIVE (148:12)
WAIVED (152:12)
WALK (63:21) (126:19) (126:21) (135:25) (136:1) (147:6)
WALKED (68:1) (118:20) (118:22) (147:5)
WAL-MART (20:16) (20:17) (20:20) (22:15) (22:16) (22:22)
(22:25) (27:25) (28:19)
WANT (10:6) (10:7) (10:8) (20:22) (30:9) (31:10) (33:8)
(33:21) (43:17) (43:18) (59:21) (59:22) (62:16) (63:20)
(63:22) (63:24) (64:1) (71:3) (73:8) (75:17) (79:21) (82:19)
(87:13) (87:15) (87:19) (89:13) (89:24) (90:1) (90:2) (94:18)
(94:22) (96:25) (98:1) (98:18) (100:22) (105:4) (106:1)
(119:23) (124:21) (127:17) (137:15) (138:9) (141:4)
WANTED (67:1) (104:18) (113:13) (115:11) (116:13) (116:15)
(126:17) (126:21) (138:12) (138:22)
WANTING (116:2)
WANTS (33:14) (43:19) (141:7)
WAS (4:22) (4:24) (6:2) (6:6) (6:10) (6:21) (6:22) (6:23)
(7:3) (7:10) (7:12) (8:5) (9:7) (10:9) (10:19) (11:15) (11:16)
(11:21) (12:3) (12:5) (12:7) (12:10) (12:13) (12:16) (12:19)
(13:21) (14:4) (14:5) (14:6) (14:22) (15:2) (15:4) (15:7)
(15:15) (15:19) (15:25) (16:1) (16:11) (16:14) (16:23) (17:3)
(17:6) (17:12) (17:25) (18:9) (19:9) (19:14) (19:16) (20:12)
(20:16) (21:17) (21:19) (21:25) (22:7) (22:9) (22:15) (23:9)
(23:21) (23:22) (23:23) (24:1) (24:7) (24:18) (24:19) (25:3)
(25:6) (25:19) (25:25) (26:1) (26:9) (26:10) (26:11) (27:5) | + +(27:7) (27:18) (27:21) (27:24) (28:1) (28:7) (28:14) (29:3) + (31:4) (32:8) (32:16) (33:12) (33:18) (34:3) (35:7) (35:11) + (35:15) (35:17) (35:19) (36:19) (36:22) (36:23) (36:24) + (37:4) (37:19) (38:15) (38:16) (39:4) (40:1) (40:7) (40:22) + (41:5) (41:7) (41:8) (41:10) (41:13) (42:8) (42:21) (42:25) + (43:4) (44:6) (45:5) (45:8) (45:25) (46:16) (46:19) (47:8) + (47:11) (47:20) (47:22) (47:23) (48:1) (48:3) (48:15) (48:21) + (49:3) (49:4) (49:9) (49:18) (49:21) (50:12) (50:13) (50:22) + (50:23) (50:24) (51:3) (51:13) (51:16) (51:18) (52:3) (54:8) + (54:17) (54:18) (56:12) (57:20) (58:1) (58:16) (59:7) (60:2) + (61:12) (61:15) (61:16) (61:21) (61:24) (62:1) (62:4) (62:5) + (62:14) (62:25) (63:1) (63:2) (63:5) (63:6) (63:10) (63:16) + (63:17) (64:16) (65:20) (65:24) (66:1) (66:2) (66:9) (66:12) + (66:20) (66:21) (66:24) (66:25) (67:3) (67:4) (67:10) (67:11) + (67:12) (67:13) (67:14) (67:16) (67:18) (67:22) (67:25) + (68:3) (68:14) (68:16) (69:23) (70:16) (70:17) (71:8) (72:6) + (72:8) (72:10) (72:11) (72:12) (72:17) (72:20) (72:22) + (72:23) (72:24) (72:25) (73:1) (73:3) (73:5) (73:10) (73:13) + (73:17) (74:1) (77:25) (81:4) (82:16) (85:22) (86:5) (91:11) + (91:25) (92:1) (92:2) (92:6) (93:20) (94:3) (94:16) (94:23) + (95:12) (96:17) (97:12) (98:12) (98:20) (100:8) (100:20) + (100:24) (100:25) (101:10) (101:11) (101:14) (101:21) + (102:6) (102:9) (102:10) (102:12) (102:21) (103:14) (103:16) + (103:25) (104:9) (104:14) (106:7) (107:10) (107:14) (108:21) + (108:24) (108:25) (109:3) (110:2) (110:3) (110:17) (111:4) + (111:13) (112:18) (112:19) (112:22) (113:15) (113:22) + (115:8) (115:14) (116:1) (116:3) (116:11) (117:13) (117:23) + (119:3) (119:6) (120:9) (120:11) (120:18) (121:6) (121:23) + (121:24) (122:9) (122:22) (123:3) (123:8) (124:6) (125:8) + (125:14) (125:19) (126:18) (127:4) (127:5) (127:6) (127:12) + (128:16) (131:6) (131:8) (131:9) (132:2) (132:9) (132:10) + (132:23) (133:1) (133:5) (133:6) (133:8) (133:15) (133:21) + (133:22) (133:23) (133:24) (134:1) (134:2) (134:5) (134:15) + (134:22) (134:25) (135:11) (135:12) (135:17) (136:19) + (137:3) (137:4) (137:17) (137:21) (138:5) (138:15) (138:18) + (139:9) (139:17) (139:18) (140:9) (140:10) (140:17) (141:15) + (141:18) (141:20) (141:23) (143:4) (143:7) (143:8) (143:12) + (143:13) (143:18) (144:12) (144:13) (146:5) (147:4) (147:6) + (147:7) (147:10) (148:13) (149:8) (150:6) (150:9) +**WASH'T** (9:6) (12:19) (14:5) (16:16) (24:10) (27:7) (36:7) + (41:6) (47:7) (61:24) (66:24) (68:12) (68:16) (72:25) (86:2) + (86:5) (86:6) (118:24) +**WATCHING** (35:11) +**WAY** (10:8) (13:22) (49:10) (81:21) (82:18) (85:4) (93:24) + (114:3) (120:22) (131:24) (142:22) +**WCBLAW** (2:5) +**WEAR** (136:18) +**WEARING** (79:25) (136:11) +**WEBSITES** (108:18) +**WE'D** (134:22) (134:24) (135:24) +**WEED** (45:9) (45:12) (46:4) (46:6) (53:24) (56:12) (56:15) + (57:15) +**WEEK** (35:15) (46:20) (47:3) (49:23) (131:20) (132:14) + (132:16) +**WEEKEND** (35:10) +**WEIGHT** (12:15) (36:22) +**WEISSING** (2:18) (152:5) +**WELL** (6:21) (6:22) (9:16) (10:7) (14:10) (17:25) (23:4) + (30:19) (32:20) (44:2) (51:3) (51:16) (54:25) (57:18) (59:23) + (65:13) (74:23) (75:14) (76:3) (76:7) (76:20) (76:22) (77:13) + (79:21) (81:7) (84:8) (84:24) (88:25) (89:12) (89:18) (90:24) + (95:1) (97:4) (108:5) (110:17) (110:18) (111:2) (111:3) + (112:5) (117:1) (139:2) +**WE'LL** (77:7) (84:24) (85:3) (88:12) (90:21) (146:1) +**WENT** (6:21) (11:18) (12:5) (12:18) (22:25) (23:18) (23:19) + (35:9) (35:10) (42:19) (42:23) (42:25) (46:24) (47:17) + (49:23) (56:25) (68:2) (86:3) (86:8) (103:16) (105:14) + (105:24) (107:18) (107:21) (110:3) (111:14) (112:12) (115:5) + (117:8) (117:12) (117:20) (117:25) (118:20) (119:1) (131:19) + (131:20) (135:13) (135:15) (135:17) (139:19) (139:20) + (140:25) (143:11) +**WERE** (6:23) (7:4) (7:8) (7:22) (8:15) (8:18) (8:22) (8:24) + (9:4) (9:15) (9:25) (10:4) (10:21) (13:8) (13:13) (13:20) + (14:3) (14:16) (14:17) (14:21) (14:23) (15:3) (15:5) (15:9) + (15:15) (15:16) (16:19) (16:21) (20:10) (20:24) (21:1) (24:2) + (24:15) (24:22) (25:3) (25:4) (25:8) (25:11) (28:2) (28:18) + (29:7) (29:9) (29:16) (33:19) (40:8) (41:3) (41:11) (41:12) + (42:17) (43:3) (43:9) (43:20) (43:21) (44:19) (45:15) (45:16) + +(45:25) (46:2) (46:6) (46:9) (46:12) (46:13) (47:11) (47:13) + (48:19) (48:22) (49:16) (49:17) (49:19) (53:12) (53:15) + (53:16) (53:20) (53:24) (54:8) (54:9) (55:11) (55:20) (55:21) + (55:22) (56:9) (56:10) (56:15) (56:24) (57:2) (57:12) (57:22) + (57:25) (61:7) (61:9) (61:25) (62:2) (62:12) (63:7) (65:23) + (66:4) (66:21) (67:7) (67:8) (68:10) (68:14) (68:19) (68:20) + (71:20) (71:21) (72:4) (73:4) (73:12) (81:15) (85:4) (85:20) + (85:21) (85:23) (86:1) (86:9) (86:13) (86:20) (87:5) (93:2) + (94:2) (94:4) (95:10) (95:15) (96:4) (96:14) (96:16) (97:14) + (97:19) (98:8) (101:14) (105:12) (106:19) (109:21) (109:23) + (109:25) (110:8) (110:11) (111:7) (111:15) (111:23) (115:2) + (115:5) (116:8) (119:1) (121:7) (124:16) (125:4) (125:11) + (125:25) (126:8) (126:12) (126:15) (126:19) (127:2) (127:3) + (127:9) (127:13) (127:19) (128:15) (128:19) (128:22) (129:5) + (129:8) (130:8) (130:9) (130:10) (130:19) (131:5) (131:7) + (132:3) (132:6) (132:19) (133:23) (137:11) (137:20) (137:21) + (139:7) (139:13) (140:5) (141:24) (142:3) (142:10) (142:11) + (144:17) (144:25) (146:12) +**WE'RE** (64:19) (82:20) (83:25) (102:3) (106:6) (106:10) + (117:18) (146:8) +**WEREN'T** (24:5) (25:24) (54:9) +**WEST** (2:4) (2:8) (2:13) (120:9) (131:1) +**WE'VE** (56:10) +**WHAT** (6:2) (6:6) (6:15) (6:18) (6:20) (7:2) (7:10) (8:12) + (8:15) (8:21) (8:24) (9:7) (9:13) (10:15) (10:18) (12:10) + (12:12) (13:1) (13:2) (16:11) (16:14) (16:17) (16:20) (17:20) + (18:12) (18:13) (19:14) (19:17) (20:10) (20:12) (20:13) + (22:24) (23:1) (23:16) (23:21) (24:16) (24:22) (27:18) + (27:21) (28:1) (28:15) (29:25) (30:23) (32:3) (33:12) (33:16) + (33:18) (34:11) (35:17) (36:1) (36:4) (36:23) (37:23) (37:25) + (40:8) (42:21) (43:10) (44:6) (44:12) (45:8) (45:12) (45:13) + (46:9) (46:12) (46:16) (47:23) (48:10) (50:19) (52:3) (52:18) + (54:22) (55:6) (55:11) (55:14) (56:7) (57:12) (57:22) (58:14) + (58:22) (61:1) (61:19) (62:25) (63:17) (64:25) (65:1) (65:4) + (65:8) (65:9) (65:12) (66:18) (67:13) (67:14) (72:10) (72:12) + (73:8) (74:2) (76:4) (76:9) (76:11) (76:14) (76:21) (82:7) + (83:1) (83:11) (84:3) (85:9) (85:11) (88:22) (89:22) (90:2) + (90:10) (93:14) (95:19) (95:20) (98:8) (100:8) (100:20) + (101:10) (103:20) (103:22) (105:15) (108:2) (108:7) (108:8) + (108:10) (108:13) (112:11) (112:24) (117:13) (120:2) + (120:13) (128:12) (131:5) (132:19) (134:10) (134:15) + (135:17) (135:21) (137:2) (137:8) (138:6) (140:15) (140:25) + (141:4) (141:12) (141:21) (147:2) +**WHATEVER** (18:7) (65:13) (66:23) (75:17) (108:9) (133:24) + (147:10) +**WHAT'S** (5:15) (18:2) (27:14) (52:25) +**WHEN** (6:23) (7:4) (7:20) (9:8) (10:15) (12:5) (12:17) + (12:18) (13:2) (14:4) (14:5) (15:16) (16:8) (16:14) (16:21) + (17:25) (18:20) (22:20) (23:17) (23:19) (24:2) (24:7) (24:12) + (24:16) (24:19) (25:3) (25:5) (26:16) (27:11) (29:16) (34:3) + (34:13) (35:7) (36:24) (37:2) (37:18) (37:19) (38:4) (38:14) + (38:15) (39:2) (39:3) (39:20) (39:25) (40:1) (40:4) (40:6) + (40:7) (40:15) (40:20) (41:8) (41:12) (42:7) (42:8) (43:9) + (43:21) (44:19) (45:3) (45:4) (45:5) (45:25) (46:6) (46:13) + (46:17) (46:25) (47:11) (48:5) (48:7) (48:19) (49:16) (49:19) + (50:13) (50:21) (50:22) (52:2) (52:8) (52:13) (52:19) (53:1) + (53:15) (53:20) (54:8) (54:17) (55:6) (56:21) (57:18) (57:25) + (58:5) (58:5) (58:14) (59:6) (60:16) (61:14) (61:15) (62:2) + (63:6) (63:7) (65:1) (66:4) (67:7) (68:14) (68:16) (68:17) + (69:12) (70:12) (72:9) (73:25) (79:2) (80:5) (80:6) (80:15) + (85:4) (85:22) (86:8) (86:13) (86:18) (87:5) (91:17) (92:11) + (93:2) (93:15) (94:2) (94:5) (95:11) (95:14) (96:3) (96:14) + (100:20) (100:23) (100:24) (101:1) (101:24) (102:9) (102:10) + (102:12) (102:17) (104:20) (105:9) (106:19) (107:21) + (108:23) (112:15) (112:25) (114:22) (115:5) (116:8) (117:11) + (117:23) (117:25) (119:1) (120:8) (120:9) (120:10) (120:17) + (125:19) (127:4) (127:9) (128:22) (129:5) (129:8) (131:18) + (131:19) (133:16) (133:25) (134:4) (134:9) (135:13) (136:19) + (137:6) (137:16) (138:5) (139:12) (140:20) (140:25) (141:12) + (143:13) (144:9) (146:10) (146:21) (147:8) +**WHENEVER** (38:5) +**WHERE** (5:21) (5:23) (7:8) (18:4) (23:19) (27:23) (35:25) + (45:15) (46:21) (48:3) (48:17) (49:6) (55:21) (62:16) (62:19) + (62:23) (65:5) (66:4) (68:20) (101:5) (101:21) (102:6) + (107:21) (107:25) (116:4) (121:7) (133:22) (137:11) (138:15) + (138:18) (141:20) (142:4) +**WHEREUPON** (4:20) (60:2) (64:16) (91:11) (98:20) (104:9) + (106:7) (123:3) (146:5) (148:12) + +WHETHER (43:8) (43:20) (50:12) (51:18) (69:13) (73:3) + (73:4) (73:9) (79:11) (79:25) (81:7) (83:23) (88:6) (90:11) + (94:21) (96:3) (103:25) (107:6) (107:10) (109:25) (111:23) + (116:12) (121:2) (123:8) (124:13) (125:14) (128:7) (128:15) + (128:16) (140:7) (142:10) + WHICH (5:8) (12:13) (18:8) (20:15) (28:12) (29:8) (30:20) + (31:3) (36:6) (37:12) (48:15) (50:11) (74:14) (83:1) (84:5) + (84:23) (93:19) (95:23) (127:19) (131:11) (138:22) (139:14) + (141:24) + WHILE (20:23) (48:22) (53:12) (92:13) (102:5) (105:12) + (106:16) (121:6) (127:3) (130:10) (136:24) (138:12) (140:5) + WHO (17:6) (23:9) (23:10) (23:14) (29:5) (59:12) (59:18) + (59:20) (67:14) (69:11) (76:11) (76:18) (81:4) (88:17) (89:2) + (92:8) (92:10) (103:4) (109:12) (109:21) (109:25) (111:15) + (112:18) (112:19) (113:4) (117:25) (118:12) (130:9) (130:19) + (137:18) (137:20) (137:21) (142:11) (142:17) (144:25) + WHOEVER (113:14) (135:12) (147:5) + WHOLE (4:23) (58:21) (63:6) (88:15) + WHOM (140:21) + WHO'S (94:24) + WHY (15:5) (15:9) (43:14) (73:23) (75:2) (126:3) (126:15) + (1:11) (3:2) (4:7) (4:21) (5:5) (5:8) (5:10) (8:13) + (18:21) (24:15) (31:25) (45:4) (48:5) (74:12) (83:15) (83:17) + (95:24) (125:3) (146:10) (148:10) (149:7) (150:8) (151:3) + (151:20) (152:2) (152:4) + (94:15) + WILL (4:11) (19:4) (33:2) (74:21) (75:19) (77:11) (82:15) + (97:21) (100:7) (131:23) (152:13) + WILLIE (81:21) + WIRE (37:16) + WISH (98:5) + WITH (10:13) (12:15) (14:6) (15:16) (19:18) (20:10) (23:17) + (24:3) (25:19) (26:10) (26:11) (26:17) (33:23) (38:23) + (42:19) (42:23) (42:25) (45:9) (48:23) (54:18) (56:3) (59:10) + (59:12) (59:13) (62:13) (62:20) (62:21) (67:20) (67:22) + (68:19) (69:3) (69:11) (69:12) (69:21) (69:23) (69:25) (70:2) + (70:5) (70:8) (70:15) (70:18) (72:10) (72:15) (73:5) (73:16) + (73:24) (74:3) (74:4) (77:15) (79:7) (79:17) (80:5) (80:7) + (80:19) (81:5) (81:8) (81:9) (81:14) (81:15) (81:19) (81:21) + (82:19) (86:4) (89:19) (90:8) (90:9) (95:19) (96:25) (97:13) + (97:15) (97:23) (98:25) (99:4) (102:11) (102:14) (102:23) + (103:2) (103:14) (106:15) (107:2) (107:15) (107:19) (110:14) + (112:15) (114:3) (114:6) (114:8) (114:12) (114:18) (114:20) + (118:25) (119:12) (119:15) (119:18) (120:15) (121:3) + (121:15) (121:20) (122:17) (123:24) (124:20) (126:12) + (126:22) (126:23) (128:16) (129:18) (133:3) (133:16) (134:1) + (134:2) (134:7) (134:10) (137:12) (137:13) (137:22) (138:16) + (139:24) (140:24) (141:11) (141:13) (141:23) (142:3) (142:5) + (143:10) (143:16) (143:23) (145:8) (146:22) (148:6) (150:15) + WITH HIM (7:4) + WITH NO (61:12) + WITH THE (4:10) + WITHDRAW (100:7) (142:8) + WITHHELD (127:25) (128:16) (128:19) (128:20) + WITHHOLDS (128:8) + WITHOUT (19:17) (85:20) (85:22) (85:24) (112:5) (112:12) + (119:9) + WITNESS (1:17) (3:1) (3:11) (4:11) (4:15) (4:22) (4:25) + (13:10) (13:14) (16:10) (25:22) (29:24) (30:2) (31:9) (31:14) + (31:17) (31:22) (32:3) (32:7) (32:13) (33:1) (33:3) (33:12) + (33:16) (34:18) (36:4) (42:1) (42:4) (44:3) (44:6) (50:6) + (54:17) (57:9) (57:11) (57:15) (63:22) (63:25) (64:11) (69:8) + (69:17) (69:19) (71:2) (71:5) (72:20) (72:22) (75:6) (75:19) + (77:4) (80:4) (81:4) (87:9) (87:22) (88:6) (88:9) (89:9) + (94:11) (96:10) (96:22) (97:12) (100:8) (104:6) (106:1) + (106:3) (119:20) (119:23) (122:13) (124:11) (124:14) + (124:19) (124:23) (125:13) (125:18) (125:23) (128:5) + (128:11) (129:2) (129:6) (129:11) (129:16) (129:21) (130:1) + (130:6) (130:14) (130:18) (130:25) (132:9) (134:13) (134:18) + (135:4) (135:20) (135:23) (136:9) (136:13) (136:16) (136:20) + (136:23) (137:15) (137:24) (138:1) (138:4) (138:9) (138:25) + (139:17) (141:3) (141:15) (142:7) (142:15) (143:4) (143:16) + (144:12) (144:21) (144:23) (145:4) (145:11) (145:16) + (147:20) (148:2) (148:12) (149:10) (152:3) + WITNESS'S (90:3) + WOMAN (142:24) + WOMEN (67:10) (70:15) (109:21) (121:3) + WON'T (53:6) + +WORD (10:6) (10:7) (10:8) + WORDS (65:6) (147:23) + WORK (24:10) (44:9) (44:19) (47:2) (47:8) (49:20) (52:8) + (65:22) (65:23) (67:17) (68:16) (109:6) (117:8) (133:13) + WORKED (41:18) (41:19) (42:1) (42:5) (44:21) (46:22) + (50:23) (52:2) (52:4) (52:10) (52:11) (52:12) (52:13) (67:25) + (85:4) (107:25) (108:5) (108:15) (113:4) (118:5) (129:12) + (133:14) + WORKING (24:2) (24:5) (24:8) (24:10) (24:19) (25:6) (25:9) + (25:12) (41:15) (41:22) (43:21) (44:24) (44:25) (50:21) + (66:4) (86:6) (99:5) (107:10) (118:23) (120:11) (120:18) + (121:21) (143:7) + WORKS (107:6) + WORLD (10:22) + WORTH (131:12) (131:13) + WOULD (4:8) (5:3) (30:4) (30:5) (31:8) (31:25) (32:18) + (32:22) (40:12) (44:17) (47:1) (50:8) (52:17) (56:14) (57:21) + (58:2) (61:11) (67:19) (68:6) (68:25) (69:5) (69:15) (70:19) + (70:20) (71:23) (73:11) (82:3) (82:6) (83:8) (85:15) (86:3) + (87:10) (89:8) (90:15) (92:18) (94:7) (95:17) (96:2) (101:23) + (104:4) (104:16) (104:23) (105:7) (105:20) (106:20) (112:7) + (113:12) (113:16) (120:3) (124:9) (126:6) (126:18) (126:19) + (126:20) (131:25) (132:11) (132:12) (134:10) (134:14) + (134:18) (134:19) (134:20) (134:21) (135:1) (135:14) + (135:23) (135:24) (135:25) (136:2) (136:3) (136:5) (136:20) + (136:23) (137:4) (137:5) (137:6) (137:7) (137:8) (137:15) + (138:9) (138:10) (141:3) (141:5) (141:8) (143:5) (143:6) + (143:19) (147:2) + WOULDN'T (136:21) (141:4) (141:21) + WRITE (90:22) (151:2) + WRONG (63:5) (106:14) (116:17) + +**X** + +XANAX (34:12) (34:16) (34:20) (45:10) (45:12) (45:13) + (45:15) (45:21) (45:22) (46:2) (53:16) (54:3) (56:13) (56:17) + (57:16) (58:17) (58:20) + +**Y** + +YA'LL (106:1) + YEAH (6:17) (9:12) (16:2) (17:25) (18:12) (20:21) (23:13) + (24:18) (24:25) (25:2) (25:5) (26:15) (31:15) (35:21) (38:13) + (38:19) (38:24) (39:1) (40:14) (40:20) (40:24) (43:5) (43:15) + (44:21) (47:7) (48:9) (50:17) (51:3) (59:17) (61:9) (61:18) + (61:23) (62:6) (63:12) (63:14) (63:22) (63:25) (64:5) (64:8) + (64:11) (66:14) (71:9) (71:14) (82:11) (82:12) (83:17) + (85:17) (88:25) (98:18) (98:23) (101:25) (103:11) (104:6) + (104:16) (104:24) (106:3) (107:23) (108:12) (110:21) + (111:11) (112:17) (112:25) (113:12) (114:24) (116:13) + (119:11) (119:23) (120:8) (120:12) (120:14) (123:22) + (125:18) (127:18) (132:24) (140:10) (140:17) (141:3) + (142:22) (144:12) (146:1) (147:13) (148:7) + YEAR (35:17) (36:23) (40:8) (57:22) (90:6) (90:7) (101:4) + YEARS (5:20) (7:3) (7:5) (7:21) (8:6) (10:19) (10:20) + (10:22) (11:14) (11:15) (11:16) (11:21) (12:4) (12:8) (15:17) + (19:5) (34:14) (35:19) (35:23) (37:5) (37:10) (37:13) (38:5) + (38:16) (39:3) (39:21) (40:5) (40:7) (41:8) (41:12) (41:14) + (42:10) (42:18) (43:3) (43:4) (43:9) (43:22) (45:5) (46:13) + (49:16) (51:2) (51:3) (95:13) (96:4) (100:24) (102:10) + (107:9) (108:23) (116:17) (116:21) (125:16) (125:21) (129:5) + (144:12) + YELLED (116:4) + YELLING (116:6) + YELLOW (91:3) + YEP (87:16) (88:2) + YES (4:25) (5:7) (5:12) (5:14) (5:18) (6:1) (6:9) (6:12) + (6:14) (7:1) (7:7) (7:14) (8:2) (8:4) (8:20) (9:20) (10:1) + (10:6) (10:9) (10:17) (11:2) (11:4) (11:6) (13:19) (13:23) + (14:7) (14:9) (14:15) (14:22) (14:25) (15:4) (15:7) (15:24) + (16:23) (17:9) (17:13) (17:15) (17:23) (18:17) (18:19) + (19:13) (19:21) (20:9) (20:21) (21:12) (21:16) (21:18) + (21:23) (22:18) (22:23) (23:4) (23:8) (23:24) (25:15) (26:19) + (28:6) (28:20) (28:22) (29:4) (29:15) (31:15) (34:3) (34:5) + (35:6) (36:25) (37:11) (37:17) (37:22) (38:3) (38:9) (39:8) + (39:17) (39:24) (40:3) (42:12) (42:14) (42:24) (43:2) (44:9) + (45:20) (46:1) (46:5) (49:8) (49:13) (49:15) (52:16) (52:22) + (52:24) (53:9) (54:1) (54:2) (54:4) (55:17) (55:19) (55:25) + (56:2) (56:4) (56:6) (57:9) (58:4) (58:7) (58:13) (59:20) + (60:15) (60:20) (65:3) (66:8) (66:10) (68:4) (68:21) (81:7) + +(104:19) (104:25) (105:6) (107:2) (108:21) 1109:11 (110:13) (111:5) (111:7)1111:9) (115:8) (116:12)1119:14) (121:6) (124:7) (124:21) (126:22) (126:23)1128:24) (131:25) (132:19) (132:23) (133:6) (133:8) (133:15) (133:19) (135:16) (139:4) (139:12) (141:6) (141:7) (144:2) (144:5) (144:8) (146:22) (148:5) (152:13) YOU'RE 115:3)118:7) (23:14)127:171 (28:15) (32:14) (51:91 (58:3) (75:7) (76:10) (76:11)(79:24) (93:9) (96:21) (120:2) (123:20) (127:15) (132:1) (135:6) YOURSELF (43:24) (132:6) (152:11) YOU'VE (18:15) (21:7) (21:9) (22:3)122:11) (22:16) (27:14) 130:251 (31:13)132:1) (50:9)153:7) (54:71 (54:14) (55:41 (75:1) (83:4) (83:6) (93:5) (103:1) + +Cos 4s) + +FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95) + +- 1 - + +FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION + +Date of transcription 08/14/2007 + +[REDACTED] was interviewed in West Palm Beach, Florida, regarding a federal investigation involving the sexual exploitation of minors. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, [REDACTED] provided the following information: + +In 2003 or 2004 [REDACTED] was introduced to JEFFREY EPSTEIN for the purpose of providing him with personal massages. [REDACTED] was approached at a party by a female she believed was named [REDACTED]. She described the female as having [REDACTED] hair and taller. The female was later identified as [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] told [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]'s friend, [REDACTED] that they could make money by providing massages to EPSTEIN. [REDACTED] told [REDACTED] that she could provide the massages with her clothes on or off. [REDACTED], who was fifteen years old, believed that she was close to turning sixteen when she first met EPSTEIN. However, during [REDACTED]'s first contact with EPSTEIN, she told him that she had just turned eighteen. + +[REDACTED] and [REDACTED] traveled to EPSTEIN's residence in Palm Beach by taxi. [REDACTED] was pregnant at the time. Once at the residence, [REDACTED] took William Epstairs. EPSTEIN entered the room wearing only a robe. Once EPSTEIN had removed the robe, both [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] provided EPSTEIN with a massage. Both [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] had removed their clothing and remained only in their underwear. EPSTEIN asked [REDACTED] to leave. Once alone with [REDACTED] EPSTEIN began to masturbate. [REDACTED] was uncomfortable. After EPSTEIN climaxed the massage was over. [REDACTED] believed that [REDACTED] had mentioned EPSTEIN might masturbate during the massage but she was still very surprised when he masturbated. EPSTEIN paid \$200.00. EPSTEIN did not touch [REDACTED] during that massage. [REDACTED] departed EPSTEIN's residence with two men that worked for EPSTEIN. They drove [REDACTED] to a Shell Gas Station located near Okeechobee Boulevard and the Florida Turnpike. + +Prior to departing the residence, [REDACTED] provided her telephone number to one of EPSTEIN's assistants, [REDACTED] (PHONETIC). [REDACTED] described her as a very pretty Hispanic female in her early twenties, with long [REDACTED] hair, and approximately 5'5" to 5'6" tall. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] another of EPSTEIN's assistants, or EPSTEIN would usually contact her. [REDACTED] would telephone and ask if she was available or if she had any other + +Investigation on 08/07/2007 at West Palm Beach, Florida + +File # 31E-MM-108062 +by SA E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall +SA Jason R. Richards + +Date cickned 08/07/2007 + +This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. + +FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) + +31E-MM-108062 + +Communication of FD-302 of [REDACTED] + +On 08/07/2007, Page 2 + +girls she could bring. When EPSTEIN telephoned, he usually asked for [REDACTED] to come over. According to [REDACTED] EPSTEIN's house telephone number began with the digits 655. She would call sometimes and leave a message. [REDACTED] stated that when they telephoned her they would inform her of when they would be coming back to town and if she might have anyone new. [REDACTED] did not believe that EPSTEIN ever really liked her. + +[REDACTED] traveled to the EPSTEIN's residence during 2003 and 2004 over twenty five times. [REDACTED] believed that she provided EPSTEIN with approximately 10-15 massages. EPSTEIN initially started out touching W[REDACTED]'s breasts but gradually the massages became more sexual. EPSTEIN would instruct W[REDACTED] on how and what to do during the massages. He would request W[REDACTED] to rub his chest and nipples. [REDACTED] stated that on approximately two occasions, EPSTEIN asked that [REDACTED] remove her underwear and provide the massage nude. [REDACTED] complied. [REDACTED] stated that EPSTEIN would make her feel that she had the option to do what she wanted. + +During one massage, [REDACTED] stated that she had been giving EPSTEIN a massage for approximately 30-40 minutes when instead of EPSTEIN turning over to masturbate, EPSTEIN brought another female into the massage area. [REDACTED] described the female as a beautiful blonde girl, a "Cameron [REDACTED]" type, 19 years of age, bright blue eyes, and speaking with an accent. EPSTEIN had [REDACTED] straddle the female on the [REDACTED] massage table. EPSTEIN wanted [REDACTED] to touch the females breast. According to W[REDACTED], EPSTEIN "pleasured" the female while [REDACTED] was straddled on top of the female. [REDACTED] stated she could hear what she believed to be a vibrator. [REDACTED] said for EPSTEIN it was all about pleasuring the female. After the female climaxed, EPSTEIN patted [REDACTED] on the shoulder and she removed herself from the table. The female got up from the table and went into the spa/sauna. EPSTEIN commented to [REDACTED], that in a few minutes the female would realize what had just happened to her. [REDACTED] received \$200.00. + +[REDACTED] advised the interviewing agents that EPSTEIN had used a back massager on her vagina. EPSTEIN asked her first if he could use the massager on her. [REDACTED] stated that she had held her breath when EPSTEIN used the back massager on her. [REDACTED] stated that at no time during any of the massages had EPSTEIN caused her to climax. + +During another massage, [REDACTED] believed by this time she was seventeen, EPSTEIN placed his hand on [REDACTED] vagina, touching + +FD•102.4 (R:v :0+95) + +31E-MX-108062 + +Coetinutim FD•302 .0c08/07/20(t .hV 3 \_\_\_ + +clitoris. mallOwas uncomfortable and told him-=to stop. EPSTEIN complied. moglestated that the incident freaked her out. WINIPstated that EPSTEIN was upset because she w -upset. ----` never return to the residence. 'stated that she did not deal with EPSTEIN anymore after that incident. + +EPSTEIN gave both SOP cho book entitled "Massage for Dummies". They received the boo . the same visit. EPSTEIN also commented how strong W1y s were when it came to her providing his massages. + +On another occasion, ed to EPSTEIN that she was looking at a car, a Toyota Co 1 PSTEIN providedImPulth S600.00 - \$760.00. ---lstated a E. TEIN gave her the money after the incident with the of e le. + +According tolial. EOS N would ask her to bring him other girls. \*\*701. who started dancing at strip clubs when she was brought eirls from the club as well as from other sources. stated she brought girls from fifteen years or age to twentyive years of age. Adift - stated that EPSTEIN would get frustrated with her if she dig not have new females for him. On one instance, EPSTEIN hung up6al. r p ecause she could not provide him with anyone niiiiiiiialosta d that EPSTEIN's preference was short, little, ' llip stated that EPSTEIN was upset when one of the other gt is. rought a black girl. liaillstated that EPSTEIN did not war black girls or girls with tatoos + +occas mass stated that one of the girls she stayed with or. On, S. also started providing EPSTEIN with gee% A telephone number for AMMUMNIPwas age.... W ha her family resides in milill , Florida, possibly —also stayed with allp during this same t riod. However, Illifla never went to EPSTEIN's house ox ed him with massages. has a Yacht Club address. + +AIC:47,! .h. Another girl that shad taker, to E?STEIN's residence as laieLast Name Unknown According to EPSTEIN liked WM.= a lot. ifilipsaid that she was never a favorite of EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN offered ...a \$300.00 to brinsiala \_ MallOwas a couple years younger thanMEMMIIMMEMMONDelieved [sat she was either 16 or 17 when she first went tc EPSTEIN's residence. said that went 2-3 times but that she did not want any part. of it after that. --- ' -lieves she could identify "Elf she saw her photograpn. also stated that at !..D4024 (Rot. I0-6-95) + +31E-Hm-106062 + +Ccatinsatim cf FD-302 of .on 06/07/200Z .he 4 + +one time attended HIGH SCHOOL. alSO, believed that they had met through a group of friends while' - adropout prevention school. + +. mentioned another girl by the name of OS INIMIS EPSTEIN distinguished the two "IS" by referring to aaej t eillaworked at an ice cream shop. Resam\_stated that she did not like moms and that MIMS was a storyteller and abad liar. MIMMIstated that iiiellinever really wanted to go to EPSTEIN's resideMe 17µt she went anyway. + +mnillftaid that she had n- dken a good look at EPSTEIN's penis. explained that it se d tke he would always try and hide his penis. We statedtI E T Nnever asked her for sex. + +cn AOMMestarted dancing ,wshe was sixteen at SOMmimmillii The owner, alb let her dance. has also worked at located i - ' 'lin Boynton Beach, Florida. - \* + +nsed/il',g drugs during the years she provided EPSTEIN with nassagew. MIIMEbsaid that EPSTEIN tried to provide her with advice regarding centrclied substances. + +--7 Y state:id that she met with EPSTEIN's attorneys. Ss illneana aunidentified female(UF), at the ALE HOUSE RESTAURANT. Witemet Weilithem after she contacted who confirmed that they were eegifly working for EPSTEIN. MI. stated that mommumalso balked of her twin boys and stated that she was living in Manhattan. .\*found out that (`and the OF are employed by + +4- '. They asked a lot of questions. They Ser specifically asked L and a dislike for ' reiterated ellele ----'--- - + +ssusealso informed the interviewing agents that she had Spoken to she believed before the fourth of July. NMI ;told fat she had met with investigators and that they nad videoed her. + +Mccrifirmed her a000ciation to the following telephone numbers: + +Old cellu:ar number - (561) Possibly an cld cellular number • 1561 mums telephone number - (561; + +FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) + +31E-MM-108062 + +Continuation of FD-302 of [REDACTED] On 08/07/2007, Page 5 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a54385936a3a755c92a0db975335c28ae5773d68 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130/EFTA02760130.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2310 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760130.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 66, + "chars": 699519, + "elapsed_seconds": 131.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DIRECT EXAMINATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 88.28999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CROSS trANINAT3011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 203.8286895751953, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 203.8286895751953, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 89.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF OATH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.968, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 89.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 404.532, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 89.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 2 ERRATA SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 187.272, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 187.272, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 460.89 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONDUCT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.464, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 319.464, + 63.99000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.42, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 334.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FORCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.96, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 48.96, + 64.80000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HAD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.66, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 64.80000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 437.5799999999999, + 692.55 + ], + [ + 449.82, + 692.55 + ], + [ + 449.82, + 704.7 + ], + [ + 437.5799999999999, + 704.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 155.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 84 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 81 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 82 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 235 + ], + [ + "Line", + 107 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 235 + ], + [ + "Line", + 111 + ], + [ + "Text", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 85 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 75 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 74 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 221 + ], + [ + "Line", + 105 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 77 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 101 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 230 + ], + [ + "Line", + 106 + ], + [ + "Text", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 284 + ], + [ + "Line", + 137 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 236 + ], + [ + "Line", + 109 + ], + [ + "Text", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 298 + ], + [ + "Line", + 143 + ], + [ + "Text", + 71 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 220 + ], + [ + "Line", + 109 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 106 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 111 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 114 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 108 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 225 + ], + [ + "Line", + 105 + ], + [ + "Text", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 219 + ], + [ + "Line", + 107 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 220 + ], + [ + "Line", + 107 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 396 + ], + [ + "Line", + 175 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 346 + ], + [ + "Line", + 173 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 325 + ], + [ + "Line", + 159 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 337 + ], + [ + "Line", + 167 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 324 + ], + [ + "Line", + 159 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 341 + ], + [ + "Line", + 169 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 334 + ], + [ + "Line", + 164 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 322 + ], + [ + "Line", + 159 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 347 + ], + [ + "Line", + 167 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 357 + ], + [ + "Line", + 168 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 353 + ], + [ + "Line", + 162 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 158 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 349 + ], + [ + "Line", + 171 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 327 + ], + [ + "Line", + 162 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 365 + ], + [ + "Line", + 176 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 159 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 335 + ], + [ + "Line", + 164 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 397 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760130" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e282c396a6bf4af3d96317f6e18a0e435140daed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S Y i F APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL, E-MAIL DESIGNATIQ IRECTIONS TO THE CLERK TO UPDATE ATI ORMATION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey co-counsel at Link & Rockenbach, P matter to the following counsel: by gives notice of the appearance of his irect all pleadings, discovery and orders in this + +Kara Be kenbach Li & Roc enbach, P.A. 15 Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 SWr es alm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 acsimile: (561) 727-3601 A÷ . Primary: KaraPlinkrocklaw.com Secondary: TrovQIinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +O + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 1, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Kara Berard Rockenbaci Kara Berard Rockenbach 03) Primary: Kara®IinIcroc Secondary: Tro .com Secondary: Eservi lin ocklaw.com + +Co-Counsel ntiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E + +## SERV + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 444 West Railroad Avenue mepasearcylaw.com West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jsx ®searcylaw.com njs®FLAAppellateLaw.com | +|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| scarolateam Co-Counsel for De J. | law.c kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or ter-Plaintiff J. Edwar J. Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik | +| Ja Lehrman | Fistos & One E. Browatd Boulevard, Suite 700 | +| 425 N. An | s Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc®nuriklaw.com Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein staff.efile@pathotojusfice.com Co-Counselor tndant/Counter-Plaintiff | + +Tonja Haddad Coleman 315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling®tonjahaddad.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad Haddad & Navarro, PLLC 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +W. Chester Jr. W. Chester Jr. P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 wcblawfaaol.com wcblawasst@gmail.corn Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss 250 Australian Avenue S., S West Palm Beach, FL 33 Id a smahone Co-Counsel for P Jeffrey Epstein inter-Defendant + +is) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e2667ffb608795e63446f99ec3b9de8aff27e2a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196/EFTA02760196.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760196.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3774, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S Y i F APPEARANCE \nOF CO-COUNSEL, E-MAIL DESIGNATIQ IRECTIONS TO THE \nCLERK TO UPDATE ATI ORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 510.1397399902344, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 510.1397399902344, + 376.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 376.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 389.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 389.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760196" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac7daf861511782e1267209d2b974367bf22d7f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.md @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +ro gdt .—•••Cs. • + +## RESPONSE TO FIRST4RtFOR ADMISSIONS + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, S, hereby files his Response to Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Req 144or , dmissions to dated June 18, 2010 as follows: + +- 1. Denied. The accurate but Request for Admission No. 1 does not accurately describe the t timon +- 2. Denjud.A mplaint was filed in Federal Court against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of L.M., but ne ,÷ 3. Defiled. + - 4. Denied on the grounds that no such testimony was given. + - 5. Admitted. + - 6. Denied. + - 7. Admitted. + +8. Denied. While a second Complaint was filed in Federal Court on behalf of L.M., it was never served and, therefore, RRA never prosecuted a lawsuit on behalf of L.M. except for the suit filed prior to MI association with RRA. + +- 9. Admitted. +- 10. Denied. See response to Request for Admission No. 8. +- 11. Admitted. +- 12. Admitted. This allegation which is accurate . was mistakenly carried over to L.M. in the drafting of the Complaint on behalf o, + - 13. Admitted. + - 14. Denied. + - 15. Denied. + - 16. Admitted. + - 17. Admitted. C + - 18. Admitted. / Iiiely + - 19. Mtn' ted. + - 20. Admitted. dmitted. + - 22. Admitted. + - 23. Admitted. + - 24. Admitted. + - 25. Admitted. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] REPONSE TO FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS + +Page 3 of 4 + +26. Admitted. + +27. Admitted. + +28. Admitted. + +29. Admitted. + +30. Denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of July, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] REPONSE TO FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS + +Page 4 of 4 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Law Offices of Mare S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d3efe255e75f99c88012af58d312b0169a42388 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199/EFTA02760199.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760199.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2949, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.927, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 532.4490000000001, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 532.4490000000001, + 118.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 306.927, + 118.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO FIRST4RtFOR ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.615, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 484.314453125, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 484.314453125, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 123.615, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.275, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.534, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.534, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 256.275, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760199" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2012fb2557b0e6cc1db6240b44e39a6c39e66beb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S Y i F APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL. E-MAIL DESIGNATIQ IRECTIONS TO THE CLERK TO UPDATE AIT FORMATION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey co-counsel at Link & Rockenbach, P matter to the following counsel: by gives notice of the appearance of his irect all pleadings, discovery and orders in this + +Scott J. Li & Roc enbach, P.A. 15 Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 .S Wes r alm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 O acsimile: (561) 727-3601 A÷ . Primary: ScottelinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina(ilinkrocklaw.com + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 1, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] J. Edwards
[REDACTED] , Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED] , Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12e1e54283af2ed5eb4c9bd07a5c3321b225b886 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203/EFTA02760203.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760203.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5952, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S Y i F APPEARANCE \nOF CO-COUNSEL. E-MAIL DESIGNATIQ IRECTIONS TO THE \nCLERK TO UPDATE AIT FORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 509.7210693359375, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 509.7210693359375, + 376.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 376.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 374.22 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760203" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa0811430b8ae35335efc46c7030bc9640f6af30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.md @@ -0,0 +1,662 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S M AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FO AMEND ANSWER AND ENDED COUNTERCLAIM + +PlaintifdCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey oves, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190, to amend his Answcr,. n .....e AffirTnative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. S Fourth Ame tgt erclaim to add additional defenses which are provided by the First and Fourteenth Am dt nts of the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, Florida common law. + +### INTRODUCTION + +in's filing of a lawsuit against J. is a form of speech which is protec" e First and Fourteenth Amendments and Article I, Sections 4 and 5 of the Florida Constitution. See Cate v. Oldham, 707 F.2d 1176 (11th Cir. 1983). This protection exists in part because lawsuits are a form of petitioning government for relief, a right specifically secured by the First Amendment. See United Mine Workers of Am. v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965); Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1%1). + +This protection also arises in part because lawsuits brought by public figures, such as J. , which seek compensation and punitive damages for harm to reputation are regarded as infringing on free speech rights. See New York Times Co. v. M, 376 U.S. 254 (1964); Silvester v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., 839 F.2d 1491 (11th Cir. 1988). The protection requires that prove with convincing clarity that Epstein filed and prosecuted his lawsuit against with knowledge of the falsity of the claims adv reckless disregard for the truth of those claims. See also McDonald v. IM, 47 . , 482 (1985) (holding Petition Clause would not bar libel claim arising from petiti to ty if plaintiff met requirements of New York Times Co. v.). + +In addition, Epstein's lawsuit against m e tethat has abused the process of this Court in order to defraud persons an i Slis ti i " financially support the prosecution of litigation. Speech of this nature is a ma c 114e " ic concern. Accordingly, the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. C \*tutio , as well as Article I, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, prohibit the impost i ility against Epstein absent proof of fault and also prohibit the award of presum itive damages absent clear and convincing evidence of knowledge of falsity or r disregard for the truth. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974). + +e Ed chums, also, are nothing more than defamation claims which are bred by defensible to defamation claims. A plaintiff may not avoid defenses that apply to defamation actions by characterizing them as torts that are not subject to those restrictions. Callaway Land & Cattle Co. v. Banyon Lakes C. Corp., 831 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Tobinick v. Novella, No. 9:14—cv—80781, 2015 WL 328236, at \*11 (S.D. Fla Jan. 23, 2015); • v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of N. Am. Eyeglasses, No. 6:14-cv-950-Or1-41KRS, 2016 WL 872936, (M.D. Fla. Feb. 17, 2016); Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 22 F. Supp. 3d 1240, 1256 (S.D. Fla. 2014), ajfd, No. 14-13855 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, 2015); Ortego Trujillo v. Banco Central Del Ecuador, 17 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 1339 (S.D. Ha. 1998); Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65, 70 (Fla. 1992) ; Ovadia v. Bloom, 756 So. 2d 137, 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co., 316 So. 2d 607, 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Clark v. Clark, No. 93-47-CA, 1993 WL 528464 (Fla. 4th Cir. June 22, 1993). The proposed amendment clearly forth this principle as a defense to Counterclaim. + +Finally, the proposed amendments to the affirmative dcfc Orth that the Due Process Clauses of the U.S. and Florida Constitutions restrict wa7ftlfig of punitive damages and that statutory and common law procedures for aw o dive damages are inadequate to secure Due Process to Epstein. + +### THE RULES REQUIRE THAT NDMENTS BE ALLOWED + +Rule 1.190(a) governs amcndme pl mgs and provides, in relevant part, that "[1]eave of court shall be given freely whe requires." Justice requires the amendment because, if properly established, the addi rmative defenses provide an absolute defense to all of the causes of action asserted . See Trust Bank, N.A. v. Von Zamft, 511 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 19 Cons6quently, Epstein should be permitted to amend his pleadings. + +The amendment does not change Epstein's answer to the allegations of the Fourth Amen tcrclaim. Rather, it simply adds Affirmative Defenses which arise from the facts that (1) was a public figure at the time that Epstein filed his Complaint against and at all times thereafter; (2) the subject matter of the lawsuit on which filed his claims is a matter of public concern, (3) Epstcin's Complaint is a form of petitioning the government, and (4) lawsuit seeks no relief other than for supposed harm arising from the publication of defamatory statements and, therefore, it is subject to all defenses that are applicable to claims for libel or slander. + +Assertion of the additional defenses will cause no prejudice to because has been aware of all of these facts from the outset of this litigation. No discovery is needed to test the veracity of the facts. The lack of prejudice to requires allowance of t e proposed amendment. New River Yachting Center, Inc. v. Bacchiocchi, 407 So. 2d 607, 6 4th DCA 1981). Leave to amend should not be denied unless the privilege has been the pleading is clearly not amendable. Osborne v. Delta Maintenance & Welding, c., o. 2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). This determination should be governed by a poli vo resolution of cases on their merits, unless the privilege of amendment has bee y nstro m v. , 354 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (holding that "[i]t is the p "S !, s State to freely allow amendments c S, to pleadings in order that causes may be tri S e merits and justice may be achieved. In exercising the discretion inherent in the • 1 co to allow or disallow amendments, all doubts should be resolved in favor of the fg ir the privilege is abused"). Epstein has not abused his right to amend. Indeed, he ended his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Fourth Amended Counterclaim a 1,10p, + +Moreover is cl from the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, status as a public figure and th hat the lawsuit filed by Epstein against involves a matter of public conce in evidence at trial inasmuch as those facts arc essential to claims. Rule 1.190(b) expressly provides that amendment of the pleadings shall be allowed to conform to the evidence. + +### CONCLUSION + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves this Court to permit the filing of the proposed Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth Amended Counterclaim, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. + +DATED: November 3, 2017. + +Respectfully submitted, + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, Pe 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Bo uite 301 West Palm Beach, Flori (561) 727-3600; (561) 1 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott + +Scott J. 602991) Kara R enbach (FBN 44903) Angelany (FBN 26680) : cottQlinkrocklaw.com Karaelinlcrocklaw.com : Angela®linkrocklaw.com Accpate secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +> Co-Counsel for Plaing7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 3, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fa] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Path Primary: Scott@linIcrockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +Co- ounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes oulevard West Palm B F1 .33409 m Co-Coup or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 Wcst Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseetindant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED], Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +### EXHIBIT A + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +A Cos + +### JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FIRS ( ii,, D ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO TH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je Eps ' ("Epstein"), pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the P his Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff le dwards' a) Fourth Amended Counterclaim ("Counterclaim"), and sta Florida Rules of Civil Answer and Affirmative Defenses to + +- 1. EBs n is that the Counterclaim alleges an amount within the jurisdictional purview oft Co but denies that is entitled to said amount. ÷E pstein is without knowledge as to .= residential status, but admits that he is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. +- 3. Epstein admits that he is suijuris, but denies he is a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. + +4. Epstein admits that he entered into a plea agreement that resulted in a felony conviction. Epstein further admits that the terms and conditions of the agreement speak for themselves. To the extent that has inaccurately summarized or interpreted any provision thereof in Paragraph 4 of his Counterclaim, Epstein denies the allegations. + +5. Epstein admits that he was a party to civil actions brought forth b purported victims, but is without knowledge as to any further investigation by federal law ment, or relationship with any other purported victims and therefore denig Jlegations and demands strict proof thereof. + +6. Epstein admits that, during certain times throu the tgation, he asserted his rights against self-incrimination as afforded him by the At ndment to the United States Constitution. Epstein denies the remaining allege ' Sn i tri ed in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. + +7. Epstein denies Paragra (, S>:1 ex tion for the allegation therein stating that is involved in pending • Federal Court under the Federal Crime Vctims' Rights Act. + +C. 8. Epstein deirsyspch and every allegation contained in Paragraph 8 and demands strict proof the + +9. in denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 9 and demands strict + +10. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 10 and demands strict proof thereof. + +II. Epstein admits some of the causes of action filed by him against are delineated in Paragraph 11 and its subparts. To the extent that has inaccurately summarized or interpreted any provision thereof in Paragraph 11 of his Counterclaim, Epstein denies the allegations.' + +12. Epstein admits that in one of his Complaints he alleged some of the causes of action against as specifically stated in paragraph 11 and its subparts, but denies that he has ever asserted a cause of action for Civil Theft against as alleged in Paragraph 12. T the extent that has inaccurately summarized or interpreted any provision of Epstei mplaint" in Paragraph 12 of his Counterclaim,2 Epstein denies the allegations. E ' er denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 12 and demands strict f. + +13. Epstein denies each and every allegation contain c • P ph 13 and its subparts and demands strict proof thereof. With respect to subsec,S( ) A n aragraph 13, Epstein further denies that actions were afforded absolut lcunder the litigation privilege. See Delmonleo v. Traynor, 116 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. + +14. Epstein denies each and al ation contained in Paragraph 14 and demands strict proof thereof. + +15. Epstein denies h a every allegation contained in Paragraph 15 and demands strict proof thereof. + +16. E If IS• deni , each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 16 and demands strict proof t + +i fails to attach a copy of Epstein's Complaint or even reference the version of the Complaint to which he refers in this allegation. + +2fails to attach a copy of Epstein's Complaint or even reference the version of the Complaint to which he refers in this allegation. + +17. Epstein denies each and every allegation and claims for damages that is contained in Paragraph 17, including its subparts, and demands strict proof thereof. + +18. Epstein admits that the Counterclaim alleges an amount within the jurisdictional purview of the Court, but denies that is entitled to said amount. + +19. Epstein is without knowledge as to residential status, but ad its that he is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. + +20. Epstein admits that he is sui furls, but denies he is a resident IR)each County, Florida. + +21. Epstein admits that he entered into a plea a ev ent at resulted in a felony conviction. Epstein further admits that the terms and it of the agreement speak for themselves. To the extent that has ina.c ly arized or interpreted any provision thereof in Paragraph 21 of his Counterclaim, cityimo 's, nies the allegations. + +22. Epstein admits that he a p to civil actions brought forth by purported victims, but is without knowledge rther investigation by federal law enforcement, or relationship with an orted victims and therefore denies these allegations and demands strict proof the + +23. E n adm is that, during certain times throughout the litigation, he asserted his rights agains crimination as afforded him by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Consti pstein denies the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 23 and demands strict proof thereof. + +24. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 24 and demands strict proof thereof. + +Delmonico v 29. Epstein denies e h an very allegation contained in Paragraph 29 and its subparts and demands strict proof With respect to subsection (d) of Paragraph 29, Epstein further denies that Edw were afforded absolute protection under the litigation privilege. See r, 116 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 2013). + +25. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 25 and demands strict proof thereof. + +26. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 26 and demands strict proof thereof. + +27. Epstein admits some of the claims initially filed by him against arc delineated in Paragraph 27 and its subparts. To the extent that ccuratcly summarized or interpreted any provision thereof in Paragraph 27 of his claim, Epstein denies the allegations.3 + +28. Epstein admits that in one of his Complaints he a s e of the causes of action against as specifically stated in Paragraph 27 an . 4 u ts, but denies that he has ever asserted a cause of action for Civil Theft against Ed \ a l ged in Paragraph 28. To the extent that has inaccurately summarized or • any provision of Epstein's "Complaint" in Paragraph 28 of his Counterclaim,4 in duties the allegations. Epstein further denies the remaining allegations contained in 12 and demands strict proof thereof. + +3fails to either attach the Complaint to his Counterclaim or reference the specific Complaint to which he is referring in Paragraph 27. + +4fails to either attach the Complaint to his Counterclaim or reference the specific Complaint to which he is referring in Paragraph 28. + +30. Epstein denies each and every allegation in paragraph 30 and demands strict proof thereof + +31. Epstein denies each and every allegation contained in Paragraph 31 and demands strict proof thereof. + +32. Epstein admits that he amended his Complaint over the course of the lie ation, and that some counts contained in his Complaint were dismissed by the Court un rejudice. However, Epstein denies that this constitutes abandonment of his clai a bona fide termination of his claims in favor. Epstein denies any contained in Paragraph 32 and demands strict proof thereof. thing allegations + +33. Epstein denies each and every allegation t la or damages that is contained in Paragraph 33, including its subparts, and demand of f thereof. + +Epstein denies is entitled to d made in his "WHEREFORE" clause, including any assertion of alleged Puniti + +### IVE DEFENSES + +### FIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For his First Affi Defense, Epstein states that Abuse of Process claim fails to state a cl ich relief can be granted as required under Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civ did not, nor will he ever be able to, assert the three requisites requ rly plead same, to wit: 1) an illegal, improper, or perverted use of process after it issues; 2) an ulterior motive or purpose in exercising the illegal, improper, or perverted process; and 3) damages resulting therefrom. S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 36 So. 3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Della-Donna v. Nova Univ., Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 411' DCA 1987). + +### SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For his Second Affirmative Defense, Epstein states that IM. Malicious Prosecution claim fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as is required under Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the requisite of a bona fide termination of the original proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff as delineated by the Florida Supre e Court as one of the legally-mandated elements to bring forth a malicious prosecution cla not, nor can it, be satisfied. See Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1994). The "original proceeding" to which refers in his Counterclaim m , the case Epstein voluntarily dismissed without prejudice and could refile at an 1 would prohibit re-filing. As such, there has not been the nding in a manner indicating ] innocence of the charges or allegations ls, n 'the first suit." See Doss v. Bank See also Yoder v. Adriatico, 459 So. 2d ona fide termination" I of Am., N.A., 857 So. 2d 991, 994 (Fla. 5 449, 451 (Fla. 51h DCA 1984) (stating th e to f malicious prosecution may not be brought as a counterclaim). + +Indeed, it is well-settl aw t t an action for malicious prosecution cannot be filed until the original action is co 1, and that counts of a Complaint that are dismissed without prejudice are not 'bona fide termination" in the party's favor. "Where dismissal is on technical gro or procedural reasons, or any other reason not consistent with the guilt of the accus not constitute a favorable determination." Union Oil of Cal. v. 468 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. + +### THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For his Third Affirmative Defense, Epstein states that MI Counterclaim fails to properly plead his damages as required under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See Miami Nat'! Bank v. Nunez, 541 So. 2d 1259, 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (stating that a litigant cannot recover as damages his own time for participating in a litigation when counsel is engaged to represent him). further pleads damages for injury to his reputation, anguish, anxiety, and embarrassment, which are impermissible and improperly pl0 fails to properly plead punitive damages as required by the Florida R es o 1 Procedure. IY, + +More importantly, however, Epstein states that n , nor will he, suffer any damages as a result of any actions allegedly taken by Eps t, this litigation with Epstein catapulted from an unknown . practitio o er at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, still utilizes his litigious \*on with Epstein at his new firm l=, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistis & Lehrman th o is firm website and firm Facebook page, to disparage Epstein, to seek new cli se behalf he can sue Epstein, to attract plaintiffs for whom he can file suit, and to aieevej otoriety with the press. See Composite Exhibit A attached hereto. + +### 'FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For h h Affirmative Defense, Epstein asserts that he is afforded absolute immunity p "Litigation Privilege" because his actions were connected with, relevant to, and material to, the cause at hand. The Litigation Privilege protects actions taken that are related to the judicial proceeding. Litigation Privilege "arises immediately upon the doing of any act required or permitted by law in the due course of the judicial proceedings or as necessarily preliminary thereto." Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1992). This absolute immunity afforded to Epstein pursuant to the Litigation Privilege appears on the face of the Counterclaim as filed by As such, is barred from proceeding with the litigation, + +### FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For his Fifth Affirmative Defense, Epstein asserts that his lawsuit against upon which claims are based is a form of petitioning government for redress. Accordingly, claims are barred by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of th ed States Constitution unless can show that Epstein's lawsuit was a "sham," rm is used in the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. See United Mine Workers of Am. v n on, 381 U.S. 657 (1965); Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Fri In ., 65 U.S. 127 (1961). A lawsuit is regarded as a "sham" only if the lawsuit was j ti baseless in the sense that no reasonable litigant could realistically expect su SS, e erits and the lawsuit conceals an attempt to interfere directly with the busin e jest of the suit. In addition, l ' ccc b "ISc claims are barred by Article I, Aection 5 e Fl 'da Constitution and the common law protection that Florida law provides to the fil. o its unless can prove that Epstein's primary motivation for filing his lawsui gaidwards was to inflict injury on and that Epstein used his privilege to sue s to gratify feelings of malevolence toward Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 2d 65 a. 1992); Nodar v. Galbreath, 462 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 1984). + +C) ixth Affirmative Defense, Epstein asserts that at the time that Epstein sued and all times thereafter, was a general or limited-purpose public figure who may not, in accordance with the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, prevail on his claims in the absence of clear and convincing evidence that Epstein knew of the falsity of the claims that he made against + +### SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +or recklessly disregarded the falsity of those claims. See New York Times Co. v. 376 US 254 (1964); Silvester v. Am. Broadcasting Cos., Inc., 839 F. 2d 1491 (11th Cir. 1988). See also McDonald v. M, 472 U.S. 479, 482 (1985) (holding Petition Clause would not bar libel claim arising from petitioning activity if plaintiff met requirements of New York Times Co. v. M). has no such evidence and, therefore, his claims fail. + +### SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +For his Seventh Affirmative Defense, Epstein asserts that the la c SO t by Epstein against upon which M claims are based involves a e lic concern. + +Accordingly, M, whether a public figure or not, c ) of cordance with the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Cons et • \*o d Article 1, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, prevail on his claims in the \c idence that Epstein was negligent in failing to discover the falsity of the claims t ihis h a v against M. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974). o evidence and, therefore, his claims fail. In addition, may not, in acco the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Articl I, S ion 4 of the Florida Constitution, recover presumed or punitive damages withou and convincing evidence that Epstein knew of the falsity of the claims that he m gains wards or recklessly disregarded the falsity of those claims. + +### EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE + +ight Affirmative Defense, Epstein asserts that M claims are nothing more than defamation claims which are barred by defenses applicable to defamation claims as set forth in the defenses above. A plaintiff may not avoid defenses that apply to defamation actions by characterizing them as torts which are not subject to those restrictions. Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Banyon Lakes C. Corp., 831 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Tobinick v. + +Novella, No. 9:14-cv-80781, 2015 WL 328236, at \*11 (S.D. FIa Jan. 23, 2015);. v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of N. Am. Eyeglasses, No. 6:14-cv-950-Or1-4 MRS, 2016 WL 872936 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 17, 2016); Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 22 F. Supp. 3d 1240, 1256 (S.D. F1a.2014), aff'd, No. 14-13855 (1 1 th Cir. Feb. 17, 2015); Ortega Trujillo v. Banco Central Del Ecuador, 17 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 1339 (S.D. Fla. 1998); Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65, 70 (Fla. 1992) ; Ovadia v. Bloom, 756 So. 2d 137, 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. tinel Star Co., 316 So. 2d 607, 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Clark v. Clark, No. 93-47 O WL 528464 (Fla. 4th Cir. 1993). + +### NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFE + +For his Ninth Affirmative Defense, Epstein s t the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and iis s , ection 9 of the Florida Constitution guarantee Due Process of law. The Florida c i ;i " and statutory principles that govern the awarding of punitive damages are not ient assure Epstein Due Process of law. They do s 6 not adequately restrain the discreti o e ry, they do not ensure that the decision with respect % pi to punitive damages will be the appropriate authority, they do not restrict punitive damages so that they are n a portionate to the harm that was caused by the actions of Epstein, and they do not eCe that pstein is protected from duplicative punishment for any acts in which e he is found t ngaged. + +specifically reserves his right to amend these defenses and plead other affirmative defenses that may become known during his continuing investigation of this action and during discovery in this case. + +DATED: November 3, 2017. Respectfully submitted, + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44 Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott linIcrocklaw Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: law.com Secondary: cklaw.com Secondary: linkrocklaw.com Co-Cou a Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr (4" Kara inIcrock w An ela inkr klawc m Tina c1 ocklawicom Tro kr. ervi + +### % CE CERTIFICA T t I + +I certify that the foregoing docum n furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 3, 201 the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.51 + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaQIinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelinkrocklaw.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Cou

| + +COMPOSIT BIT A + +![](_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg) + +- Proven Results +- Media +- Bloq +- 800-400-1098 + +search + +# September 2012 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. + +0 Soarch 1 Attorney Brad who is representing several young menSvho.say former youth pastor sexually abused and physically abused them was Interviewed by CBS4 MIAMI. + +![](_page_21_Picture_9.jpeg) + +# Firm Supports. RAINN DAY - September 27th + +Jaffe Weissing Is proud to support Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network's RAINN Day September 27th. RAINN Day Is RAINN's annual campaign to raise awareness and educate students against sexual violence on college campuses. RAINN DAY is a grassroots program designed to empower college students to raise awareness of sexual violence and recovery resources on their campus. Click here to learn how Jaffe Weissing helps crime victims and victims of sexual assault. + +# • Attorney Steve Jaffe Interviewed in Elder Abuse Case + +Naples News interviews attorney Steven Jaffe regarding his case involving elder abuse. A care facility took control of an ailing dementia patient's trust account 30 days before her death, with the assistance of a Fort Myers attorney. The case which was filed in 2011 is still pending. + +# Zambrano Named to Million Dollar and Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum® + +Attorney Gabriel F. Zambrano has been certified as a member of both the Million Dollar Advocates Forum® and the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum®. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members. Forum membership acknowledges excellence in advocacy, and provides members with a national network of experienced colleagues for professional referral and Information exchange in major cases. Members of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum must be Life Members of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum and must have acted as principal counsel in at least one case which has resulted in a multi-million dollar verdict, award or settlement. + +# October 2012 Thr + +![](_page_22_Picture_7.jpeg) + +Gary FJA President Presents Civil Justice & Merit Reten ion 1 o FAMU Law Students + +FJA President Gary RI meets with Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) law students to discuss the civil justice system and view the documentary "Hot Coffee. Here Gary shows his appreciation to the FAMU Law School Ambassadors for the Florida Justice Association (FJA). + +FJA President Gary [REDACTED] Addresses Law Students on Merit Retention & Judiciary System![](_page_23_Picture_14.jpeg) + +Florida Justice Association President Gary [REDACTED] spoke to more than 120 law students at the Coastal Law School Outreach Reception about the importance of Justice and Merit Retention and why it matters. Students also watched a showing of "Hot Coffee," the 2011 documentary film that analyzes and discusses the impact of tort reform on the United States judicial system. Four other colleges and universities will be participating in similar discussions over the next couple of weeks. + +**Firm Attorneys Attend & Present at MTMP Seminar**Several of the firm's attorneys are attending the Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar this week (October 10-13). Attorneys Gary [REDACTED] and Matt Weissing presented Qui Tam - Blowing the Whistle on Corporate Fraud at the Securities and Business Torts Breakout session of the Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar on October 12th. + +**Class Action Final Approval Granted**We obtained final approval of a Class Action case against Continental Casualty Company ("CNA") for systematic denial of long-term care insurance claims. We're very pleased to recover meaningful insurance benefits for a deserving group of Floridians and we are equally pleased to protect the status of nurse registries as covered providers + +![](_page_24_Picture_2.jpeg) + +Gabe Zambrano. GaryMI (FJA President) and Seth Lehrman attended the Florida Justice Associations A) Founder's Awards Dinner in Boca Raton.on October 5th. ( 14/ 114/ ..) + +Gary = Sr. Addresses. Florida Supreme CourtJudtices + +![](_page_24_Picture_5.jpeg) + +Attorney Gary Sr.l argued before Florida's Supreme Court yesterday on behalf of the Respondent regarding an uninsured motorist insurance policy claim. + +# Supports National Crime Prevention Month + +Jaffe Weissing proudly supports National Crime Prevention Month — October 2012, sponsored by the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC). National Crime Prevention Month recognizes and celebrates the practice of crime prevention, while promoting awareness of important issues such as victimization, volunteerism, and creating safer, more caring communities. This year the firm wants to raise help awareness of the following crimes: sexual abuse & assault: negligent security and inadequate security; and nursing home abuse and neglect safety issues. Visit our Facebook Gooqle+ and Twitter feeds for ways to protect you and your family. + +# Welcoucie to the Farmer Jaffe Weissing rress Release section ot our wensite. + +Here you will find our breaking news and announcements from our firm. We welcome any inquiries. If you have any questions regarding arelease or case, please contact us. For Archived Press Release click here. + +# August 2012 + +# Jury Awards 113 Million to Woman Injured in Plummeting Elevator Accident + +Partner Brad received a\$13 million verdict on August Brad Edwards31, following a twoweek jury trial. Thirteen years ago, Janice Beasley (41 years old) was riding in an elevator that plunged several floors before crashing to an abrupt stop. Ms. Beasley sustained significant permanent injuries which have confined her to a wheelchair for nearly 13 years. The defendants sought to avoid responsibility for this accident, which Ms. Beasley believed was both preventable and the cause of more than a decade of life-changing medical problems. + +![](_page_25_Picture_7.jpeg) + +# Five Jaffe Weissing Attorneys Included in The ers in America® + +The firm is pleased to announce that five of the firth attorneys have been selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® 2013 (Copyright 2012 by Woodward/White, Inc: of Aiken, SC). The following attorneys were selected in their respective pratie areas: + +Gary - Mass Torts Litigation I Class Action - Plaintiffs Steven Jaffe - Mass Torts Litigation / Class Action - Plaintiffs Matt Weissin - Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Brad - Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Gar Sr. - Appellate Practice + +![](_page_25_Picture_11.jpeg) + +# Firm Sponsors ABOTA Annual Professionalism Seminar + +The American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), Fort Lauderdale r held it's 1st Annual Professionalism Program in honor of Henry T. Latimer. Jaffe Weissing was one of several sponsors, where members of the Judiciary, eir Judicial Assistants, and local members of the Bar explored issues facing the profession from the prospective of these groups. For photos of the event visit ABOTA's Facebook Page. + +# Justice for Amputee in Plane Propeller Accident + +The attorneys and staff at Jaffe Weissing are proud to have been able to assist out client Mr. whose arm had to be amputated as a result of an airplane propeller accident, in rs pursuit of justice and fair compensatIon,and to hold Greenwich Insurance Co. to Its obligations. This case highlights the importance of obtaining insurance coverage to account for the possibility that an injury could occur on ones premise and how too often insurance companies disregard their contractual obligations and leave prudent businesses exposed to potentially devastating judgments. + +# Floridians at the Mercy of Private Insurance Companies + +Read Gary M. Jr's. important editorial on State Farm's recent request for a 14.9% insurance rate increase. Why does State Farm Insurance Co. seek a "statewide average increase"? The simpe and sad answer: Because it can. + +![](_page_26_Picture_7.jpeg) + +So what should homeowners and renter do? Ask for additional public hearing regarding the renters' insurance and all other insurance rate increases. And tell the Office of Insurance Regulation to reject State Farm's unreasonable price hikes. + +Click here to'read complete editoral. For the Tallahassee Democrat, click here. + +# JULY 2012 + +# A Torch That For Justice + +Meet the c rida Justice Association President Gary In the case of the family, the torch has been passed. Click he entire article. + +![](_page_27_Picture_1.jpeg) + +# Firm Cases Recognized as Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements for 2011 + +![](_page_27_Picture_3.jpeg) + +Firm Attorney's Matt Weissinq, Brad and Gabrie F. Zambrano's cases were recently published in the Daily BusineSs Review and VerdictSearch.com's Top Florida Verdicts and Settlements for 2011. + +Matt Weissing and Br ard's premises liability case was. against Festival Fun LLC Doing Business as Boomers. A young man with a promising football career was shot in the parking lot and sustained permanent nerve injury due to the property's lack of security. Following a two-week trial, a Broward County Jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for \$4,255,280.00. + +G ri - Zambrano and co-counsel's product liability case was against R.J. Tobacco Company and Phillip Morris. They represented a widow whose husband was a smoker. The case alleged that the cigarettes caused the man's fatal lunch cancer. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for \$3,551.277.00. + +# Class Action Case Against CNA Receives Preliminary ARrar + +Our client's class action seagainst CNA, for Attorney's Steven Jaffe and Mark FIstosdiscrimination against Nurse Registries in FL, has received preliminary approval from Federal Judge Zlock. + +Jaffe Weissing attorneys Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos were named Class Counsel. Final approval hearing is set for September 27th, 2012. + +![](_page_27_Picture_10.jpeg) + +"We have total confidence that Judge Zlock will enter a final order at the September hearing, thus ending the discriminatory practices of CNA," said Jaffe. "Nurse Registries around the state should be very happy." + +Zambrano is also fluent in Spanish. + +# JUNE 2012 + +# Gabriel F. Zambrano Joins Jaffe Weissing + +![](_page_28_Picture_3.jpeg) + +We are leased to a nounce that trial attorney Gabriel F. Zambrano has joined the Jaffe Weissing team. Zambrano's practice will focus on mass torts, defective drugs defective medical products, personal injury and wrongful death litigation. + +Zambrano gained national prominence as an early advocate on behalf of girls and women that suffered life altering blood clots, strokes or heart damage from use of the DROSPIRENONE (DRSP) containing birth control pills trademarked and manufactured by BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS: YASMIN, YAZ, BEYAZ & SAFYRAL.He is currently accepting and investigating cases involving PRADAXA (DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE), aFDA blood thinner and NUVARING VAGINAL RING contraceptives linked to fatal blood clots, strokes, pulmonary emboli and deep vein thrombosis. CL) + +## 'Cc The Florida Justice Association Recognizes Achievements of Attorney Gary M. Farmer, Jr. + +![](_page_28_Picture_9.jpeg) + +rida Justice Association (NA) recognized attorney Gary M. Jr., as arecipient of their EAGLE Legend Award on Friday, June 15th at the Annual Convention on Marco Island. The EAGLE Legend Award is one of FDA's highest honors for lifetime leadership and commitment to supporting the goals of the FJA in protelifie legal rights and safety of the injured and Florida's Families. has personally given more than \$100,000 to FJA throughout his legal career. + +In addition, the FJA presented with the EAGLE Top Recruiting Champion Award in recognition for recrui raising the most EAGLE money during 2011-2012. The FJA also presented with the 2012Gold EAGLE Award for gaining distinction at the highest level of commitment to the values of FJA founders (time, financial resources and energy) by exhibiting a steadfast duty to protect and defend civil justice. + +## Attorney Gary M. Installed As President of the o Justice Association + +Attorney , Gary M. was installed as President of the Florida Justice Association (FJA), astatewide legaiewsigajzation comprised of civil trial lawyers in the State of Florida. MI was + +![](_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg) + +officially sworn in as the 53rd President during the Florida Justice Association's Annual Convention held on Friday, June 15, 2012, at the Marriott Beach Resort Golf Club & Spa on Marco Island. + +# Judge Grants Final Approval in David J. Stern Class Action + +U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr., entered an order on June 8, 2012, granting final approval of the class action law suit involving foreclosure attorney David J. Stern for violations of federal labor laws by him former employees. Attorneys Steven Jaffe, Gar M. Jr., Mar • tos, and Seth Lehrman, along with co-counsel Dawn Rapopor an andra Doucette represented a class of hundreds of former employees of the Law Ices of David Stem, P.A., DJSP Enterprises, Inc. and Stern's affiliated foreclosure processing businesses. + +# Read Gary MI 2011 Legislation Session Review in t + +Attorney Gary M. .Jr. tat k back at the 2012 Legislative Session in the South Florida Legal Guide. is an active Florida. Justice Association lobbyist, who has spent more than six weeks each year for the past seven, working only on consumer protections and access to the courts. + +# FMSpeaks to Students at Local + +Attorney Gary M.MILh -. spoke to students at Heron Heights Gary FarmerElementary School in Parkland, Florida on June 1st on the importance of the Bill of Rights. + +![](_page_29_Picture_8.jpeg) + +# MAY 2012 + +Included in The National Trial Lawyers Association's Top 40 Under 40 + +Attorney Brad EdWards has been included as a member of The National Trial Lawyers Association's Top 40 Under 40.This invitation is extended exclusively to those individuals who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results, and leadership as a young lawyer under the age of 40. + +![](_page_29_Picture_12.jpeg) + +## Jaffe Presents at Private Care Association's Best Practices Conference + +Attorney Steve Jaffe presented "Current Litigation Trends When Dealing With Denials on Long Term Insurance" at the 2012 Private Care Association of Florida's Best Practices Conferences for Registries in Fort Lauderdale. + +# APRIL 2012 + +Crohn's & Colitis Fundraiser- 4th Largest Ever + +Attorney Steve Jaffe thanks everyone who donated and Team Lyndsay - Take Steps & Be Heard - Crohn's & Colitiswalked for Team Lindsay in the 2012 Take Steps for Crohns & Colitis on Saturday, April 28, 2012, at Arts Park on Young Circle in Hollywood. Team Lindsay helped raise more than \$5500, which helps support patient programs, education, and furthers crucial research. The entire even raise over \$160,000 - the 4th largest fundraiser. AlwaS, + +![](_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg) + +![](_page_30_Picture_5.jpeg) + +Brad Runs for Victim's Rights + +Run To Remember 5KAttorney Brad= participated in the. Broward Victim's Rights Coalition's Annual Run to Remember 5K In Hollywood on April 28, 2012. The event raised awareness and funds to benefit crime victims in Broward County. + +![](_page_30_Picture_8.jpeg) + +Brad Presents Seminar on Enforcing Victims' Rights + +Attorney Brad , an OVC Training Consultant; presented an 8-hour seminar on "Enforcing Victims' Rights.' as part of the Palm Beach Victims' Rights Coalition's Extending the Vision Reaching Every Victim Program on April 26, 2012, in West Palm Beach. The seminar, which was part of a week-long series of programs by the Palm Beach Victims' Right Coalition, was also part of National Crime Victims' Rights Week (April 22-28). + +![](_page_30_Picture_11.jpeg) + +Brad. Victims Presents Webinar on Maximizing Recovery for Sexual Abuse + +Attorney Brad Edwards presented an important online webinar on April 25, 2012, on "Maximizing Recovery. for Sexual Abuse Victims" as part of SeminarWeb Live! FJA Webinar. This presentation was part of National Crime Victim's Rights Week. + +Gary Presents at Auto insurance Seminar + +Attorney Gar M. Jr. presented "Constitutional Issues Arising Under 'New PIP"' at the Florida Justice Association's Auto Insurance Seminarin Orlando on April 26. + +Gary Presents at National Trial Lawyers Association Conference + +Attorney Gary M. Jr. presented "State Attorney General Gary FarmerActions in Drug Cases: Are You Wasting All of Your Hard Work?" at the National Trial + +Lawyers Association's Mass Tort Made Perfect Conference in Las Vegas on April 20, 2012. + +Gary Sr. Presents at National Trial LawyersAssociation Cora + +Gar Sr. was part of a panel that discussed "The Gary M. , . fects of the Precedent-Setting Mensing & Kendall ns" at the National Trial Lawyers Association's Mass Tort Made Perfect Conference in Las Vegas on April 18, 2012. + +![](_page_31_Picture_5.jpeg) + +![](_page_31_Picture_6.jpeg) + +Jaffe Weissing Support National Crime Victims' Rights + +it .ne Victims' Rights Week - April 22 - 28, 2012, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice Office for Victims of Crime (OVC). To learn about how we help crime victims visit: www.pathtolustice.com www.lusticetovictims.com, or www.abuseandassault.com. , Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman proudly support National + +![](_page_31_Picture_9.jpeg) + +Jaffe Weissing Advocates National Sexual Assault Awareness Month + +, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman,Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM)- April 2012, sponsored by the the National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC). View Release + +# MARCH 2012 + +Brad Presents at Florida Justice Association's Workhorse Seminar + +![](_page_31_Picture_12.jpeg) + +Attorney Brad Edwards presented "Maximizing Recovery for Brad EdwardsSexual Abuse Victims" as part of the Florida Justice Association's Workhorse Seminar on March 23 in Orlando. + +![](_page_31_Picture_16.jpeg) + +Brad devotes a large amount of his practice to sexual abuse and sexual assault cases. He is a major advocate for victim's rights and has provided hundreds of hours of probono services each year to Victims Advocates Services and victims' rights groups throughout Florida. + +Gary Presents at Florida Justice Association's Workhorse Seminar + +Attorney Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. presented Gary [REDACTED] "Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Qui Tam Cases - But Were Afraid to Ask" at the Florida Justice Association's Workhorse Seminar on March 22 in Orlando. + +![](_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg) + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Sr.'s 4th DCA Ruling Quoted in The Atlantic Magazine Regarding the Trayvon [REDACTED] Shooting + +Gary [REDACTED], Sr.'s 4th DCA opinion was quoted in The Atlantic regarding the Trayvon [REDACTED] shooting... Here's how one Florida appellate judge, in a 2006 ruling, interpreted the low legal threshold necessary to move the burden of proof on self-defense from people like Zimmerman to prosecutors: + +![](_page_32_Picture_19.jpeg) + +To repeat, the law did not require defendant to prove his justification of self-defense to any standard ...measuring an assurance of truth. He did not have to prove the exigency of self-defense to a near certainty (reasonable doubt) or even to a mere probability (greater weight). His only burden was to offer additional facts from which it could be true, that his resort to such force could have been reasonable (emphasis in original). Click this link to read Mr. [REDACTED] 2006 ruling. + +**Support Team Lindsay - Crohn's & Colitis Take Steps Walk** + +Once again Steffi and I (Steve Jaffe) have formed Team Lyndsay - Take Steps & Be Heard - Crohn's & Colitis Team Lindsay to walk in our annual Take Steps Walk on Saturday April 28, 2012. This year the Walk will be held in A NEW LOCATION at ArtsPark on Young Circle in Hollywood. Last year's event drew more than 1,500 people and raised over \$200,000. This year's event promises to be a fun filled evening for the entire family. + +![](_page_32_Picture_23.jpeg) + +As you all know our daughter Lindsay was diagnosed with Crohn's disease when she was 15 years old. She has done remarkably well for herself despite the flair ups and hospitalizations that she has endured over the years. She became an accomplished scholarship athlete, playing soccer at Appalachian State University. She has graduated and is pursuing a career in Sports Administration. We are so proud of her. Unfortunately, others have not fared as well as Lindsay, nearly 1.5 million Americans, many who are children suffer from Crohn's and Colitis and the number of people being diagnosed each year is increasing. The funds we raise through the Take Steps Walk will help support world class scientific research and sponsor educational programs and services for those afflicted with these diseases. Our hope is that others will be able to manage the disease as well as Lindsay has so far. + +We would really appreciate your support. Please visit Team Lindsay page. Just click on this link and sign up to be a team member on Team Lindsay. It will be a fun night. There will be plenty of food and entertainment, if you are unable to attend the walk, any donation is greatly appreciated. + +### Firm Hosts Press Conference for Attorney Representing Trayvon Family + +e rump & Gary FarmerOur firm hosted a press conference today for Attorney Crump of Crump in Tallahassee, who is represent ng Trayvon family, the young teenager shot and killed by watch captain Zimmerman. Here Attorney Crump talks to Attorney Gary M. Jr. before the news conference. For more photos of the news conference click here. C + +![](_page_33_Picture_5.jpeg) + +## Former Employees of David Stern Agree to Settlement.mk + +Approximately 800 former employees of foreclosure attorney David J. Stern, who alleged that Stern and DJSP Enterprise did not give them 60 days notice as required by the Federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification or WARN Act, have reached ajustninary settlement. Our firm and co-counsel Dawn Rapoport and Chandra Doucette represent the named plaintiffs and class members. A final hearing before U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro will be held in Miami In June. Media coverage includes the Sun-Sentinel and the Daily Business Review. + +## Seth Lehrman Guest Lectures at Nova Southeastern University Law School + +Attorney Seth Lehrman was a guest lecturer at Nova Southeastern Alcorn. University's Law School. Seth presented on professional responsibility and ' La un ethics. His lecture focused on protecting clients' rights following the dissolution of a law firm. + +2013 Jaffe, Weissing. Fistos & A rights reserved.Sltemap Legal Disclaim( + +Your Path to Justice Begins and Ends With UsI + +- Home +- About Us +- Practice Areas +- Attorneys +- Proven Results +- 131oq +- Contact Us + +© 2012 - Path To Justice + +**[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, [REDACTED], FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.,** +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_35_Picture_16.jpeg) + +![](_page_35_Picture_17.jpeg) + +Jaffe, Weissing, +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +(888) 670-2451 + +CALL TODAY FOR A Free +CASE EVALUATION + +Search + +p + +- • Home +- • Sexual Abuse + - • Boy Scouts + - • Church + - • Cruise Ships + - • Day Care + - • Disabled Persons + - • Entertainment Industry + - • Foreign Exchange + - • [REDACTED] Care + - • Medical Professionals + - • Nursing Home + - • School + - • Summer Camp + - • Work Place + - • Youth Sports +- • Notable Cases +- • About Us +- • Victims Advocate +- • Under Investigation +- • Resources + - • News + - • Seminars + - • Links +- • Contact Us + +![](_page_36_Picture_3.jpeg) + +# Sexual Abuse I Sexual Assault + +SC/ • use victims afC not alone and they have rights, if and when they are ready to pursue them. At Jaffe Wcissing, we want to empower victims to come forward, report crimes and hold perpe ra ors accountable; thereby educating the community and in, kin 'others to do the same. + +# Sexual Abuse Cases Under Investigation + +# Looking for Witnesses in AllegV Ntual Abuse Cases + +We support crime victim'stases with intensive tactual and legal research. We arc investigating the following matters and issues that clients and other have brought to our attention. We are currently searching for witnesses to assist•us in the following cases. If you have information, please contact us here or call 888-670-2451. You can remain antonymous. + +- YOUTH PASTOR J. LONDON Our law firm is actively investigating and representing victims claiming sexual abuse by former Youth Pastor J. London. Click video below to see exclusive interti + +4,r\_ + +![](_page_37_Picture_3.jpeg) + +g + +- JEFFREY EPSTEIN (Registered Sex Offender) Our law finnTho. scented numerous civil cases against registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He is known to have molested children in various places, including on his private airplane. He is a registered sex offender in Florida, New York and the Virgin Islands. + - Florida Sex Oliender Fiver + - Nex% York Sex Offender Flyer + - Virgin Island Sex (Wender Fiver + +If you have any information about his molestations of children or other crimes of his that are known to you, please call our law lip% If you were a former employee or a victim yourself. or have any information regardin ills cripinal activity, please contact us. Your name can remain anonymous. u + +# HOW CAN WE HELP YOU? + +Full Name + +; ► **submit** + +..... ... ...\_. Brief description Email Address Phone Number of your issue. + +- -• Find us nn Faccbook You +- In rt Mtn% us on YoVlutthe +- ti Follow its on (innate+ + +*Your Path +to Justice +Begins +and Ends +With Us!* + +- • Home +- • Sexual Abuse +- • Notable Cases +- • About Us +- • Victim Advocate +- • Contact Us +- • Disclaimer + +![](_page_38_Picture_17.jpeg) + +**Jaffe, Weissing, +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.** + +425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +(888) 670-2451 + +© Copyright 2012 [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +All rights reserved. Designed by BARD Marketing | Powered by eOS \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72e363571bdd9134c17cb4da0eb2d3365024adf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/EFTA02760206.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2902 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 39, + "chars": 60742, + "elapsed_seconds": 20.35, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_21_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_22_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_24_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_24_Picture_5.jpeg", + "_page_25_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_25_Picture_11.jpeg", + "_page_26_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_28_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_28_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_5.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_11.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_5.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_6.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_19.jpeg", + "_page_32_Picture_23.jpeg", + "_page_33_Picture_5.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_17.jpeg", + "_page_36_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_38_Picture_17.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S M \nAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FO \nAMEND ANSWER AND \nENDED COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 521.706787109375, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 521.706787109375, + 376.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 376.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 527.626 + ], + [ + 356.5689392089844, + 527.626 + ], + [ + 356.5689392089844, + 541.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 541.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE RULES REQUIRE THAT NDMENTS BE ALLOWED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 493.3454895019531, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 493.3454895019531, + 390.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 390.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.3033142089844, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.3033142089844, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FIRS ( ii,, D ANSWER AND \nAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO TH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.8, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 520.5514526367188, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 520.5514526367188, + 389.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 91.8, + 389.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IVE DEFENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 384.961669921875, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 384.961669921875, + 445.10302734375 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 445.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 400.0505065917969, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 400.0505065917969, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 407.56805419921875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 407.56805419921875, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.3206481933594, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.3206481933594, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 408.32061767578125, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 408.32061767578125, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 400.81805419921875, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 400.81805419921875, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 401.2181396484375, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 401.2181396484375, + 555.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 555.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 411.3206481933594, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 411.3206481933594, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.63200000000003, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 406.82061767578125, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 406.82061767578125, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 205.63200000000003, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 307.10302734375 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 307.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "% CE \nCERTIFICA T t I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 389.0419616699219, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 389.0419616699219, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 127.863037109375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 127.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.249996185302734, + 239.24499999999998 + ], + [ + 255.94715881347656, + 239.24499999999998 + ], + [ + 255.94715881347656, + 269.257568359375 + ], + [ + 63.249996185302734, + 269.257568359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Supports. RAINN DAY - September 27th", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.2, + 579.054 + ], + [ + 360.5317077636719, + 579.054 + ], + [ + 360.5317077636719, + 597.1564788818359 + ], + [ + 61.2, + 597.1564788818359 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 Attorney Steve Jaffe Interviewed in Elder Abuse Case", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 42.060001373291016, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 374.4985656738281, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 374.4985656738281, + 66.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 42.060001373291016, + 66.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Zambrano Named to Million Dollar and Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum\u00ae", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 161.38899999999998 + ], + [ + 516.6168212890625, + 161.38899999999998 + ], + [ + 516.6168212890625, + 180.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 180.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2012 Thr", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 412.79900000000004 + ], + [ + 289.35955810546875, + 412.79900000000004 + ], + [ + 289.35955810546875, + 440.9870300292969 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 440.9870300292969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FJA President Gary [REDACTED] Addresses Law Students on Merit Retention & Judiciary System", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 41.361 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 41.361 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 78.667 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 78.667 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Attorneys Attend & Present at MTMP Seminar", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 393.335 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 393.335 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 410.366 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 410.366 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Class Action Final Approval Granted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 493.89899999999994 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 493.89899999999994 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 511.741 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 511.741 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 FJA Founders Awards Dinner", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.02000045776367, + 41.31 + ], + [ + 273.6026306152344, + 41.31 + ], + [ + 273.6026306152344, + 64.41650390625 + ], + [ + 44.02000045776367, + 64.41650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supports National Crime Prevention Month", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 355.44287109375, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 355.44287109375, + 491.9164733886719 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 491.9164733886719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Welcoucie to the Farmer Jaffe Weissing rress Release section ot our wensite.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 42.172 + ], + [ + 520.6416015625, + 42.172 + ], + [ + 520.6416015625, + 89.82818603515625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 89.82818603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 174.36499999999998 + ], + [ + 219.29823303222656, + 174.36499999999998 + ], + [ + 219.29823303222656, + 202.70843505859375 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 202.70843505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jury Awards 113 Million to Woman Injured in Plummeting Elevator Accident", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 207.61599999999999 + ], + [ + 453.9697570800781, + 207.61599999999999 + ], + [ + 453.9697570800781, + 245.733 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 245.733 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Five Jaffe Weissing Attorneys Included in The ers in America\u00ae", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.2, + 415.23199999999997 + ], + [ + 493.7724914550781, + 415.23199999999997 + ], + [ + 493.7724914550781, + 450.105 + ], + [ + 61.2, + 450.105 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Sponsors ABOTA Annual Professionalism Seminar", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 72.884033203125 + ], + [ + 479.8629150390625, + 72.884033203125 + ], + [ + 479.8629150390625, + 108.967041015625 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 108.967041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Justice for Amputee in Plane Propeller Accident", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 483.61932373046875, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 483.61932373046875, + 243.20703125 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 243.20703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Floridians at the Mercy of Private Insurance \nCompanies", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 382.2640380859375 + ], + [ + 443.94598388671875, + 382.2640380859375 + ], + [ + 443.94598388671875, + 418.70703125 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 418.70703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JULY 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 598.59 + ], + [ + 200.4983367919922, + 598.59 + ], + [ + 200.4983367919922, + 626.9660339355469 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 626.9660339355469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A Torch That For Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 628.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 342.9824523925781, + 628.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 342.9824523925781, + 652.70703125 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 652.70703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Cases Recognized as Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements for 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 150.5140380859375 + ], + [ + 498.5210876464844, + 150.5140380859375 + ], + [ + 498.5210876464844, + 189.217041015625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 189.217041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Class Action Case Against CNA Receives \nPreliminary ARrar", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 454.2640380859375 + ], + [ + 424.5491638183594, + 454.2640380859375 + ], + [ + 424.5491638183594, + 493.0860290527344 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 493.0860290527344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JUNE 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 196.84442138671875, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 196.84442138671875, + 329.7525329589844 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 329.7525329589844 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Gabriel F. Zambrano Joins Jaffe Weissing", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 494.18231201171875, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 494.18231201171875, + 75.32586669921875 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 75.32586669921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'Cc \nThe Florida Justice Association Recognizes \nAchievements of Attorney Gary M. Farmer, Jr.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 325.6154479980469 + ], + [ + 461.1883850097656, + 325.6154479980469 + ], + [ + 461.1883850097656, + 375.697509765625 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 375.697509765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorney Gary M. Installed As \nPresident of the o Justice \nAssociation", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 388.3003234863281, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 388.3003234863281, + 665.0467758178711 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 665.0467758178711 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Judge Grants Final Approval in David J. Stern Class Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 101.7640380859375 + ], + [ + 517.57470703125, + 101.7640380859375 + ], + [ + 517.57470703125, + 136.3470458984375 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 136.3470458984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Read Gary MI 2011 Legislation Session \nReview in t", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 457.6794738769531, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 457.6794738769531, + 299.8470458984375 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 299.8470458984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FMSpeaks to Students at Local", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.869998931884766, + 367.2156066894531 + ], + [ + 373.9976806640625, + 367.2156066894531 + ], + [ + 373.9976806640625, + 423.23406982421875 + ], + [ + 58.869998931884766, + 423.23406982421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MAY 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 481.3577880859375 + ], + [ + 188.27679443359375, + 481.3577880859375 + ], + [ + 188.27679443359375, + 509.3670349121094 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 509.3670349121094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe Presents at Private Care Association's Best Practices \nConference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 404.3208923339844, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 404.3208923339844, + 660.6664733886719 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 660.6664733886719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APRIL 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 40.550000000000004 + ], + [ + 210.35939025878906, + 40.550000000000004 + ], + [ + 210.35939025878906, + 68.151123046875 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 68.151123046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MARCH 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.913000000000004, + 466.6077880859375 + ], + [ + 223.52679443359375, + 466.6077880859375 + ], + [ + 223.52679443359375, + 494.6170349121094 + ], + [ + 61.913000000000004, + 494.6170349121094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Support Team Lindsay - Crohn's & Colitis Take Steps Walk", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 398.41200000000003, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 398.41200000000003, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 401.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Hosts Press Conference for Attorney Representing Trayvon \nFamily", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.95000457763672, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 160.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 69.95000457763672, + 160.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Former Employees of David Stern Agree to Settlement.mk", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.52999114990234, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 397.4145812988281, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 397.4145812988281, + 303.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 68.52999114990234, + 303.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Seth Lehrman Guest Lectures at Nova Southeastern University Law School", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 427.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 504.09716796875, + 427.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 504.09716796875, + 445.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 445.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sexual Abuse I Sexual Assault", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.124, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 360.9033203125, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 360.9033203125, + 261.84552001953125 + ], + [ + 47.124, + 261.84552001953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sexual Abuse Cases Under Investigation", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.124, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 468.24627685546875, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 468.24627685546875, + 356.70709228515625 + ], + [ + 47.124, + 356.70709228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Looking for Witnesses in AllegV Ntual Abuse Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.124, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 465.0784606933594, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 465.0784606933594, + 391.4097900390625 + ], + [ + 47.124, + 391.4097900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 41.004000000000005, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 357.5822448730469, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 357.5822448730469, + 515.5860290527344 + ], + [ + 41.004000000000005, + 515.5860290527344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Your Path to Justice Begins and Ends With Us!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 49.04, + 45.416 + ], + [ + 131.182, + 45.416 + ], + [ + 131.182, + 133.00400000000002 + ], + [ + 49.04, + 133.00400000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 283 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 387 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760206" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2515a564619540877557d30b7c431a02b7f20b2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:69d2e525ac8ae9337f9bdafc742646d2987515078e29ed2fe41f6315289084a0 +size 6440 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0689f58af7a0ad9060d65b2cebf4f79a5b7145e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_21_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ecf9bcdea56285ff96b881e879f4e9fc0d4b4ef90513be7990490452c50b96f6 +size 36109 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_22_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_22_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90c2a57d4b4c6bbc2eeb392038afb40c095d345c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_22_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:79f2d0bf3a0f8f05cb8520d0518f81d87b870d487bad8a98194e0c24622a858c +size 17312 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_23_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_23_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b86c3d7aed2832cc5033488b043fce3a97f0556 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_23_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aabe5ead85fc825ec8a0e4c8f4a252674d84b2a7e217a0a8fc573171032541ac +size 21152 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..71f08f2554ed76594e55e8a94aa6eb420ff38ff4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1992ba044e4ee75c1ac7fef96b0d3f79e70cab77d0200841beb0a01500ed7331 +size 19703 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd79f925bcd000414b42c29ec8a3e9cc5504ef64 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_24_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a83cb60731c4de7a60494f83b43ed0fcf7a489913cef3286cbb472f1d7e4016b +size 17463 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98aa74f968f2067f96b7c50c782127137168be69 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:92274ccd364c7477b55baa24998547cb4934180d5a50e75342ef27ff1fd292eb +size 30471 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42d7a403565f457d4e515dd0914a8e654ffb907c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_25_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c21d4ea15d96b179e365ce6a271b84b4cd53c56513d90f7e7738d3bfa2c86076 +size 13288 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_26_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_26_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..078b5ec30392c1373d22bfd72ebdb819b026ebb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_26_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52ae85c7998e41e6772d73730335ecbacdfc9d2640869e597154fe49cca15a16 +size 7814 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d8227a3d9ddba31bbba8a269f7d0e5cb0bfbb8c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:540bd82b34ebc824ecc084d94a9e2b1b6fbbddeb7e9798c52fc725ab0d2304ae +size 17698 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..309232cede58bcde9294dacf6015ef30489caeff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:65ecf054d48d451577f7b95c7ec440ae586b4d3b15cd39f1011a358673bbcd52 +size 15275 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c15c5e4ef595ad796146ce3493e827fe88033bbd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_27_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:df049de0e7ea5ba57d37e11f5b09a790f0f2675ca467fd0efa5f6d5dc7203ee2 +size 6894 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecd298be91654d00751ab9913b1c12bfa3ed344c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fe80d56ef7fd8cc6d47f5287593c2d13081e752f585fa174165b24e4fd3bcb4f +size 8951 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ffb7dbfcc8cccecf0239d17b69e5b4d8be48609 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa8ca4b5b702c5c1f1b70611199fe0782afb386759c3f19e591b98d461f179ea +size 9698 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61fb349a893b0878323aaec9ab4b08e20abeae7a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_28_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f0d1b60e4cf05dc6012362ee42e07c15fc87d3da62a7f3521ec5578d8c92f8ca +size 7380 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b100b35af303dfd2876f9e53610aaf902b0fcc7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:03b811609a813a1c62da712a3338db73595967a5cdf79914e430cd468e402088 +size 8397 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0841eb55aaf896d0bb42d347cd7cb9c84c99289 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_29_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:65d8ea3927963ac8c378acd055edbb8360c79705cc12253c805268ab3af967bd +size 8973 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbb315ce07fa1c64af7d0818904035b7cb6772c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a19bfa69b6918e7bbdf56853a68033f72f151a8b667155d73e80cc62244a8273 +size 7828 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fef6fbfd917617dd4abeb1ce771c1eeb6dd39866 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6e0d31b516e8ce73fe4257cbb6090a390c0b156191c5339bfb4017b794ce9e59 +size 6272 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e922eeae40d073844c728022431162850426663b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:def60c2f5049ba80f9f24260fbee0d186e63d3a5699f7eab8bc42b255f1b2ef7 +size 12544 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939f953dafb26ac1f311025ec2f8cb17b5830acb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_30_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d125dfa21015df5d5714a0f50cc079719d9aeed4a7c486debaa931aaeb12feb0 +size 6113 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e79e19025786ac6bcb98cee2664b2907de8487f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:293fa41e7f3dd29b7e0b6b592f804fa3d1f71c5b17ebd532ffccaca4e73b904b +size 8326 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d8dd3b8b23a3835ed20b4a2ee2a7e11bb6f1b01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f5741e3b4d5ad87691753972af813495738e738e4fc82663d4331efda991403c +size 7119 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a62b48e8b7e472095d35001d3a1733097563300 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:22e8acd945f8e35395d58961906c4394c7e9f206bcb881a63d2576fd155cbb1e +size 8119 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..121d21e9465dc4af1a117126e050bebc2fac0ca9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2e4334e303db9459d91a3161047211baceded5404d7bcfb918e05a2c06fe1c13 +size 8207 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8eca0b77d314a011287ac63dcab82b7a56afe84c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_31_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:540b84d49b8e6bf80a3032874858e7ec1aa7344a2860335c6e14ffd5686ea259 +size 7255 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..601b379c65f3c73616d604fb1bc7c7437ade93c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:749898e60c93c75d4391af4bb33f2657ffa33f9c8372ea23f1647b8cf1e77844 +size 7017 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_19.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48df18a519d5e3bfbb7bd244ab9b359512df5c9a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_19.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dec5fac20caabc1e746c8d672c94cf5382ba768347b51528aeeed2b94ac4823e +size 7165 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_23.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8328602bba1ac47c99a6fda079b935ba9956df9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_32_Picture_23.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c29def08ed7b2f6d286094138da76d7111dc57ae71c8bbff537c9b8c77cc6aaf +size 12750 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_33_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_33_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0996f72c3a3417b9b35e116adc25e15d2abafb5a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_33_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f3afcfc5cf295a3cd5e23f90696e0d9177d361d276f28b12978c1cbecd7fdbb2 +size 9220 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22484b447c6cb28fb7cedd508feb93a035c715fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dac5eba00f8083c918b7d431890950e145dcf84881e993f150cd247fe9625aec +size 5084 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e446e32c390c8f2aaabb786113c39b5bd8e4017 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_35_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55e75e23c411d4880fb51d9d94c5f69092df71545675429ab1d4246f24be77b9 +size 2252 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_36_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_36_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1165f45add75527de3944fbe2a6050ee3a0a220d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_36_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b8aa546893a0d1270499e28ec38beb0d4984b65db2594860a66a1bd959916ac7 +size 8048 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_37_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_37_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cfe3c07d5aa72c43dc1c21f7e26f7afe9316857 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_37_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5e2dbab7e07f792e6e5ccd724e4f74cddc7862c01010e51c725188df47f0c9b3 +size 34135 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_38_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_38_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebdbfde1c54da3efa2b467b1c70a7498bd124f72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760206/_page_38_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:81fd37af4449fb4ccd0783851233c3778179795b7711ee286ef0b566191657bb +size 3895 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8ddb50c64219bceca9b4e6ac20c8c4f7c06297e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.md @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## OBJECTIONS TO EPSTEIN'S TRIAL EXHIBITS + +Counter plaintiff, EM2iIk following Objections to Jeffrey Epstein's Ex(10:14"ist: ough his undersigned counsel, files the + +## INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +- 1. No Objection +- 2. All Objections +- 3. Materiali d evancy +- 4. Reas +- 5. Predicate +- 6. Authenticity +- 7. Other + +| Epstein Exhibit Number | Epstein Exhibit Description | Objections | +|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| 1 | Information Charging Scott W. Rothstein in United States of America v. Stott W. Rothstein , 09-60331-CR-COHN; dated December 1, 2009. | 3, 7 (hearsay) | +| 2 | Plea Agreement between United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein , 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed December 1, 2009. | 3 | + +| 3 Amended Complaint in Razorback | | +|-------------------------------------|-----------------------| +| 4 All Depositions taken of Scott W. | | +| Rothstein | in In re: Rothstein | +| and any and all ancillary cases | - a | +| Razorback Funding LLC e | ). | +| Scott W. Rothstein, et al. | I 9- | +| 5 The video | 'on and all | +| exhibits as | kiStrused in the | +| Depositio | Sco . Rothstein taken | +| by E | e 14, 2012. | +| ? s , | | +| P vt | g_ of Jaffe, 2 | +| iss | , Fistos & Lehrman, | +| D ebruary 23, 2011 as filed in this | | +| atter and | in In re: Rothstein | +| osenfeldt Adler, | P.A.; 09-34791- | +| by | J. | +| 9 All ositions taken of | J. 2 (except hearsay) | +| Counterclaim | in this matter, via | + +| 10 | All documents and exhibits provided by ██████ J. ██████ in this matter. | 2 | +|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| 11 | Transcripts of all depositions taken in the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's case in chief and the Counterclaim filed by ██████ J. ██████, including all exhibits marked at said depositions | 2 | +| 12 | All of ██████ Answers to Interrogatories, Responses to Requests for Production, and Response to Requests for Admissions. | 2 | +| 13 | Complaints and Docket from L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 09-CV-81092-COHN; and 502008 CA 018051 XXXXMB. | 1 | +| 14 | Subpoena(s)/Notice(s) for Deposition of Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Mark Epstein | 3 | +| 15 | Subpoena to Leonard Baird | 3 | +| 16 | Notices to produce medical records to Charles J. Galecki, M.D., Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D. and Steven R. Alexander, Ph.D. | 3 | +| 17 | Any ██████ and ██████ all exhibits/documents/pleadings referenced in Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment as to ██████ Counterclaim. | 2 | +| 18 | Deposition of Jack (John) Scarola dated July 2, 2013 taken in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ; 09-34791-RBR. | 3, 7 (hearsay) | + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXIMAG Objections to Epstein's Trial Exhibits Page 4 of 6 + +| 19 | RRA Firm Directory dated October 23, 2009. | 1 | +|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| 20 | Screenshots of the [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing firm website in which Epstein's name appears. | 2 | +| 21 | Screenshots of the [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing firm, including its attorneys' Facebook pages, and other social media, in which Epstein's name appears. | 2 | +| | The Defendants reserve the right to produce any newly discovered evidence upon proper notice. | 2 | +| | The Defendants reserve the right to produce any exhibits used for impeachment or rebuttal | 2 | +| | The Defendants reserve the right to [REDACTED] d and/or supplement this Exhibit List as information becomes available upon proper notice | 2 | +| | All exhibits expected to be offered at trial by the Defendants, except those used for impeachment, will be made available for inspection at the offices of the undersigned at a mutually convenient time and date | 2 | +| Supplemental Exhibit 1 | Government's Motion to Withdraw It's Motion For Reduction of Sentence of Scott Rothstein, dated September 26, 2017. United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein , 09-CR-60331 COHN | 3, 7 (hearsay) | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 3rd day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +██████████ Objections to Epstein's Trial Exhibits +Page 6 of 6 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████, Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61ef7802fcf566974972ce2d90e9e765e4da96a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245/EFTA02760245.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,329 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760245.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 9320, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.23, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 117.10302734375 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 117.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS TO EPSTEIN'S TRIAL EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 470.91461181640625, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 470.91461181640625, + 352.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 352.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 432.521 + ], + [ + 375.71478271484375, + 432.521 + ], + [ + 375.71478271484375, + 448.60302734375 + ], + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 448.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760245" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3a1e1df14d814dd9fc95ca418091d996fc4347c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## JOINT MOTION TO DISPEN EDIATION + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Eps efendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. + +jointly request that the Court dis the mediation requirement and state: + +- I. Pursuant to this Co 0, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial, the parties are required to particip in illation before trial. +- 2. The parti have iscussed their respective settlement positions and agree their views of the case a ny c templated settlement ranges arc too far apart to result in a successful mediation se Ae. parties point out that, in September 2015, they participated in a mediation session, bu eached an impasse. +- 4. To avoid the unnecessary cost and expense of a second mediation session, the parties respectfully request that the Court dispense with the mediation requirement. + +GO + +DATED: November 6, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +By:/s/Jack Scarola. with permission Jack Scarola (FBN 169440) mep@searcylaw.com jsx(searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Co-Counsel or J. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach 44 3) Angela M. Many (FB Primary: link Primary: K com Primary: An in cklaw com Secondary I a cklaw com Sccon inIcrocklaw.com Seco linkrocklaw service@linIcrocklaw.com + +el for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant stein + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Path Primary: Scott@linicrockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco inlcrocklaw.com 5- anya®Iinkrocklaw.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 6, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com (ISI S1 rCounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Scarola, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes oulevard West Palm B F1 .33409 m Co-Coun endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 Wcst Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiterdant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED], Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8874a66f3a3ba6c99eec0e15cb649c0f887324d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251/EFTA02760251.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760251.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5964, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 114.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 114.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT MOTION TO DISPEN \nEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 451.47235107421875, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 451.47235107421875, + 363.10302734375 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 363.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760251" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..141cfb716ba26b4f2ad728064a5a8359c6b8e82e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## N (Date Cleared With Counse + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plain r-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated ore the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County 1 c, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom IOC, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +- MOTION: 1. nt Motion to Dispense With Mediation; and + - 2. Si Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines or, in the Alternative, Bifurcation of Trial + +tO Wednesday, November 8, 2017 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who mar be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorne ed on the Service List below on November 6, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal ant o Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROC10ENBA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes ul ard, Suite 301 West Palm Beac 'chi 401 (561) 727-3600 27-3601 [fax] + ++6s + +By: /s/ Scs + +S J. RN 602991) d Rockenbach (FBN 44903) . Many (FBN 26680) ry: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com mary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaelinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dec@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Cou

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted a una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c mo tniento pan poder participar en ate procedimiento, usted tiene de hot tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama d de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 1 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribun e T t i ediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo an comparecencia que se ha programado a menos de 7 dias; si ust e\4e iscapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83954616194cb7414dc31f7cf9db3371b7fd82bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255/EFTA02760255.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760255.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8203, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "N\n(Date Cleared With Counse", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 376.60302734375 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 376.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 636.79 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 636.79 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 652.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 652.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760255" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41abdb82883c94bd2690df607cb255d75907ee1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.md @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintifl/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TINUANCE OF TRIAL AND TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES HE ALTERNATIVE BIFURCATION 0 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps laintiff) moves under Rule 1.460 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for a bri commencing on December 5, 2017 Plaintiff moves under Rule 1.2 limit the first stage of the mgs to: (i) Plaintiff's case and damages against Defendant Scott Rothstein and (ii) t abs of probable cause element of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. CI n t") malicious prosecution claim. 444a te4P 1continuance of the special set 10-day trial xtend the pre-trial deadlines. In the alternative, orida Rules of Civil Procedure to bifurcate the trial and + +## BACKGROUND + +AI ugh this case has been pending since December 2009, in May 2014, this Court granted final summary judgment in Plaintiff's favor. Defendant appealed, and the Fourth District + +I Counsel for Plaintiff has contacted counsel for Defendant, who opposes this Motion. + +Court of Appeal reversed and remanded in November 2015, with the Mandate issuing in December 2015. The matter was sent to the Florida Supreme Court and, in large part, there were no substantive filings in this case until June 2017, after the Supreme Court declined jurisdiction. Defendant noticed this matter for trial shortly before the Supreme Court's decision and, in July 2017, the Court entered its trial order, special setting a ten-day trial less than five mon hs away. + +#### INTRODUCTION + +The trial should focus on a handful of narrow issues: (1) Plainti es caused by Rothstein's2 criminal conspiracy; (2) whether Defendant can pm intiff never had probable cause — both at the inception of filing suit and thro Vt proceeding -- to allege Defendant's connection to Rothstein's criminal activiti , ) ether the proceeding against Defendant concluded with a bona fide termination ' Si v , (4) whether Defendant can prove that Plaintiff acted with malice; and (5) wheth en t was damaged. "San /614c m + +c ' d about the relevancy of printed First, Defendant must have chan his or published media about him associating his e • laintiff's because, despite an "irrelevant" objection to an interrogatory served in epte r 2017, Defendant, one month later in October 2017, disclosed a damages ex t focuses on just this type of publication damage. This expert disclosure, chanp¢ Defe dant's position regarding the discovery sought by Plaintiff from "irrelevant" lyly relevant," requires that Plaintiff have an opportunity to obtain answers to the di efendant refused to answer, take the deposition of Defendant's expert, obtain a rebuttal expert, and review the claim that more than nine million people read Plaintiff's allegations against Defendant in more than 100 news articles. Florida courts do not condone, nor does Plaintiff believe Defendant's counsel intended, trial by ambush. A brief continuance allows for Defendant + +2 The Clerk of this Court entered a default against Rothstein on January 21, 2010. + +to amend the discovery answers and Plaintiff to conduct the necessary discovery as to the new damages claim. + +Second, it has become clear that Defendant has no intention of litigating the five simple issues listed above. Instead, he intends to re-litigate each of his clients' cases (and other alleged victims' cases) against Plaintiff; return to his prosecutor days and try a criminal case distracting the jury with inflammatory allegations of sexual misconduct that have nothin with the elements of his malicious prosecution claim. The Court should not allo Is of matters that have been concluded or arc irrelevant within this one. (See ge tiff's Motion in Limine.) If the Court allows Defendant to pursue this trial c s ,i n Plaintiff either needs more time to prepare for trial or the trial should be bifur , 4 'n anner Plaintiff proposes. + +"Sd PLAINTIFF HEARD THIS CO illkfl, r AND CLEAR Following the Court's clear and un vice at the October 3, 2017, hearing to fortify lead counsel in the preparation defe e of his claim, on October 13, 2017, Plaintiff retained new trial counsel, who a e case on November 1, 2017. Plaintiff also retained a team of lawyers from the Gu r la firm as trial support. None of the things Plaintiff is asking for in this Motion is b ck of manpower. Even using all of these resources, there is still not enough time et ev hing that is needed done before the December 5, 2017, trial date. Important) and his trial counsel will not seek another continuance. We will be ready to try the days. + +#### ARGUMENT + +#### I. PLAINTIFF NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREPARE FOR TRIAL DUE TO EVENTS OUTSIDE OF HIS CONTROL. + +There are several important tasks that must be addressed before trial. First, Plaintiff needs to identify and hire an expert to address the extent to which Plaintiff's allegations damaged + +Defendant's reputation and the testimony of Defendant's newly disclosed expert who will be testifying on this subject. Second, counsel need to interview the attorney who filed the initial Complaint on Plaintiff's behalf and review his files. Third, Defendant claims he may call more than 150 witnesses at trial, but only a handful of those witnesses have been deposed, and Plaintiff's counsel need time to ask the Court to have Defendant identify the witnesses who will actually be called at trial so Plaintiff can determine if their depositions are necessary, an nduct the depositions. Fourth, Defendant has, to date, not produced crucial eviden ci to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Plaintiff's counsel cannot properly prepare f tr a I the Court rules. For example, Defendant has only disclosed the anticipated tes y 1 of the 159 witnesses t he identified on his Witness List and provided incom ct information (i.e., he only provided physical addresses, not c-mail addresses o 44;:it numbers). In addition, Defendant has not provided relevant and important ti about his damage claim and relevant information about his expert's recent! ova report. As will be explained in Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel, against Defendant's Fourth direct the path the trial wi ation and the documentation are necessary to defend ounterclaim. Finally, substantive motions, which will eed to be resolved by the Court, but the hearing on those motions is currently set o few days before the trial is to commence. It is difficult for Plaintiff to trial without knowing which case will be tried. Properly p + +y, a motion for continuance has three requirements: it must be in writing, it must be signed by the movant, and it must state all of the facts that entitle the movant to a continuance. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.460. See also Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.545(e) ("Continuances should be few, good cause should be required, and all requests should be heard and resolved by a judge."). This motion + +satisfies these requirements and Plaintiff has made this request in good faith. The Court should grant the motion in the interest of justice. + +## a. Exaerts + +Throughout the pendency of this litigation, Plaintiff has served multiple discovery requests to determine how Defendant's reputation was damaged and how he suffered monetarily. On October 20, 2017, Defendant served his expert's untimely report3 which revealed fendant's expert relies on the same type of documents Defendant early claimed were "' t nt."" Because of this new development, Plaintiff needs to obtain the discovery t objected to as irrelevant, retain a rebuttal expert witness and have the expert + +Specifically, in interrogatories, Plaintiff asked De ut his use of Plaintiff's name reputation. Defendant responded that the mg e .41 to promote his practice and the evidence Defendst to rely on to prove damage to his Ss , irrelevant": + +> 34. Please describe in social media outlet, materials, or any o your law fum, o ever advertised, Epstein, and inch and every disse inati Pe to an identify with specificity every log, printed materials, seminar or published media on which you, iation with which you are affiliated has es, or otherwise places the name of Jeffrey detailed description and the date(s) of each ference, advertisement, placement, publication, or promotion, identify the persons or groups of om the same was made, and state the locations where state whether or not the materials used in connection with reference, advertisement, placement, publication, mination, or promotion are in your possession or control, or are + +3 Pursuant to the Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial, the parties were required to disclose 60 days prior to trial (i.e., by October 6, 2017) expert witnesses along with (1) the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; (2) the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; (3) a summary of the grounds for each opinion; (4) a copy of any written report; and (5) the expert's curriculum vitae. Defendant, however, did not provide his expert's report to Plaintiff until October 20, 2017 — two-weeks after the deadline to do so. + +still available on line or in print, and identify the persons or website from whom such materials may be obtained. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. ... + +35. Please describe with particularity any and all evidence, circumstances and events upon which you rely in asserting that your reputation was damaged as alleged in your Counterclaim, including, without limitation, specifically describing how that damage attributable to Epstein's lawsuit against you. + +RESPONSE: The allegations of Epstein's maliciou Complaint are defamatory per se. + +Plaintiff's Interrogatories dated September 5, 2017, and Defendant's ses dated September 25, 2017, Nos. 34 and 35. + +Just recently, however, Defendant disclosed thr pert that he is relying on this same type of information that he earlier refused to + +> 15. The defaming statemen g Mr. J. with the illegal activities o tt Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein's la a a nst Mr. have been disseminated to at 1 7 e media or other sites in 104 separate stories or articles 'nod 9,669,542 potential daily visitors since the laws rt w ed to the date that I filed this report, inclusive. + +Dr. Bernard J. Jansen, Oc 0, 2017, Report, ¶ 15. + +Because published necting Defendant to Plaintiff, Plaintiff now needs the discovery Defendant claimeA elevant and also must identify and retain an expert to testify about, among other things, the number of people who may have read articles discussing Plaintiff's allegations tying Defendant to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, and the impact this may or may not have had on Defendant's reputation. The expert will need time to study and investigate Defendant's responses to the previously objected to discovery (which the Court should order be produced forthwith) and late disclosure and change in position regarding the relevance of printed or Defendant's expert's analysis, perform his own study, draft his own report, and assist Plaintiff's counsel in preparing to take the deposition of Defendant's expert. Plaintiffs expert's deposition will need to be taken as well. All of this cannot be accomplished in a single month. + +### b. Plaintiff's Original Counsel + +A central focus of this case is what Plaintiff knew at the time the original Co plaint was filed and his legitimate basis for bringing this lawsuit. Plaintiff was represen obert D. Critton, Jr., at the time the original Complaint was filed. Plaintiffs new t" (:) el needs time to review Mr. Critton's files and speak with Mr. Critton to ensure th s case is properly presented to the Court. Unfortunately, Mr. Critton has a hea 'a eland has been unable to devote the time necessary to review his files and refresh 11 If ion before being interviewed. Mr. Critton expects it will be a few weeks before he \n v that time to this matter. + +Plaintiff's counsel cannot fairly and e Present Plaintiff's case without speaking with Mr. Critton, and the continuance s d be nted. CI Ziegler v. Klein, 590 So. 2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) ("[W] ' ted facts reveal that the physical condition of either counsel or client prevents fair uate presentation of a case, failure to grant a continuance is reversible error."). + +# c. With + +Defe as identified 159 witnesses on his Sixth Amended Witness List, but only a handfi witnesses have been deposed. Plaintiff has moved to exclude the testimony of twenty witnesses and one category of witness that Defendant describes as "witnesses expected to be presented." (Omnibus Motion in Limine at 21-22.) In addition, until the Court determines what case will be tried (i.e., Defendant's malicious prosecution claim or Defendant's "victim" cases), it is premature, a practical impossibility, and a financial burden to both parties to take the + +depositions of more than a hundred witnesses. The hearing on these trial issues, however, is not set until November 29, 2017 — just a few days before the trial date. If this Court denies Plaintiff's motion to exclude the witnesses—despite their lack of firsthand knowledge concerning the elements of Defendant's malicious prosecution claim and any affirmative defenses Plaintiff may offer—then the Court should order Defendant to identify the witnesses he actually, intends to present at trial and grant a continuance so Plaintiff can take their depositions and dPRe 'ne what, if anything, they know regarding the elements of Defendant's claim. hyeNy ent, Plaintiff's counsel will not have sufficient time from the date of the Court's I to conduct this substantial deposition discovery. + +# d. Pre-Trial Deadlines + +If the continuance is granted, Plaintiff also tr Sis ort< t'ill9he " current trial deadlines be reset based upon the new trial date, including allow' ts , ies to file amended Exhibit and Witness Lists and to identify experts. + +### II. THE COURT SHOUL ATE THE TRIAL IN THE INTEREST OF EFFICIENCY AND T ZE THE RISK OF PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF. + +Despite these obstacles, tiff could be prepared to proceed to trial as scheduled on December 5, 2017, if th urt bifurcated the proceedings and limited the first stage to: (i) Plaintiff's an ages arising from Rothstein's conspiracy to commit abuse of process and (ii) intiff had probable cause to commence these proceedings against Defendant. This Cou furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice[,] may order a separate trial of .. . any separate issue." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.270(b). "[B]ifurcation is generally proper absent a specific threat of inconsistent verdicts or prejudice to a party." Johansen v. Vuocolo, 125 So. 3d 197, 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citation and quotation marks omitted). + +Bifurcation on the terms proposed by Plaintiff is appropriate here. There is substantial overlap between (i) the facts that Plaintiff will present to explain Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the damages he incurred as a result of it and (ii) the facts known to Plaintiff when he commenced these proceedings against Defendant, i.e., the facts this Court will consider when it determines whether Defendant has proved Plaintiff lacked probable cause. See Alamo Rent-A- ar, Inc. v. Mancini, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1357 (Fla. 1994) (jury decides disputed issues o but court determines whether those facts establish probable cause) (citation omitted) ents, the jury will have to determine the dollar amount of Plaintiff's damages ca events, the jury will have to decide what Plaintiff knew abouttet onzi scheme when he commenced these proceedings so the Court can determ' t h r Plaintiff "had a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to ' Ss, , validity of his claim." See v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DC fming probable cause) (citing v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). tein. And in all + +Bifurcating the trial and d g Plaintiff's case and damages against Rothstein and the related issue of what Plaint when he commenced these proceedings will expedite the resolution of Defendant's us prosecution counterclaim, minimize the parties' expenses, and conserve judicial win and the (malici urces. If the Court holds that Plaintiff had probable cause, Defendant cannot over. See v. GCG Beverages, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1218 (Fla. 1986) ution has six required elements, and the absence of any one of them is fatal) (citation omitted). If that happens, the parties will not have wasted time and money preparing for trial on the other elements of Defendant's counterclaim (expenses that would include the fees associated with deposing Defendant's proposed witnesses, since their testimony would no longer be necessary) and the Court, likewise, will not have devoted time and attention to issues that had no effect on the outcome of the case. + +Finally, bifurcation avoids unnecessary prejudice to Plaintiff. Defendant obviously, under the guise of establishing the proceeding against Defendant was brought with malice, intends to relitigate every part of his clients' (and other victims') claims against Plaintiff But this evidence is simply not relevant to the narrow issue of whether Plaintiff reasonably believed on public information from the government and investors about Rothstein's PontPonzi Ilegations and news reports that Rothstein had used Defendant's cases against Plain olrelf third parties into investing in non-existent settlements, Defendant's abusive di very, and Defendant's commencement of a 159-count lawsuit in federal court, as er served, when a duplicative case was already pending in state court—that he ha mst Defendant. If the Court allows Defendant to tar Plaintiff with inflammatorya stt' f sexual battery before the jury makes its findings about what Plaintiff knew whe fiS g it against Defendant, it is likely that the jurors will ignore relevant evidence and ' Plaintiff just because they despise him. Bifurcation of the trial avoids this unneces p udice to Plaintiff and a pure legal action to receive a fair trial. + +# CONCLUSION + +Plain es this Court to grant his motion for a brief 90-day continuance of the parties' trial d extension of the pm-trial deadlines. In the alternative, Plaintiff moves this Court to bifurcate the upcoming trial and limit the first stage of the proceedings to (i) Plaintiffs case and damages against Rothstein and (ii) the absence ofprobable cause element of Defendant's malicious prosecution claim. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 6, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fa] + +By. is/ScottJ. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 5;10 903) Angela M. Many (FEtIt2 Primary: Scott@linkrockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco' inlcrocklaw.com Eservice6idinkrocklaw.com nkrocklaw.com + +eS eeS I 'Counsel fo r PPlaintiff/Counter-Defendant "s aw ffrey Epstein + +# 4 RVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach es B and West Palm Beac 334 law.com Co-Cot Defendant/Counter-Minty). J. 'wards & Shipley, P.A. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsaILAAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseltiendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED], Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +~~TRIAL CONTINUANCE APPROVED:~~ + +Jeffrey E. Epstein +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Dated: November 6, 2017 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d15c489b84f7cf01ec02750ee114b364e222d57 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259/EFTA02760259.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,777 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760259.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 22928, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TINUANCE OF TRIAL \nAND TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES HE ALTERNATIVE \nBIFURCATION 0", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 362.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 362.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 568.149 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 568.149 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 583.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 583.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 356.9588623046875, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 356.9588623046875, + 224.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 224.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 610.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 610.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. PLAINTIFF NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREPARE FOR TRIAL DUE TO \nEVENTS OUTSIDE OF HIS CONTROL.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 543.4478149414062, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 543.4478149414062, + 652.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 652.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Exaerts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 169.6771240234375, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 169.6771240234375, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Plaintiff's Original Counsel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 270.4097595214844, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 270.4097595214844, + 169.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 169.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. With", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 528.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 528.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Pre-Trial Deadlines", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 230.15463256835938, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 230.15463256835938, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE COURT SHOUL ATE THE TRIAL IN THE INTEREST OF \nEFFICIENCY AND T ZE THE RISK OF PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.062744140625, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.062744140625, + 528.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 528.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 416.6021728515625 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 416.6021728515625 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 478.23779296875 + ], + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 478.23779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760259" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12e13b61bf22a19a6e788547651269b47061f743 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). ,..c ) + +## ORDER SPECIALLY SE IticA FEARING ) + +THIS CAUSE having come to be co n the ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING HEARING, and the Court having revie %It le and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED/ that a 4 Hour Specially Set Hearing is scheduled for November 29, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Donald Hafele, at the Palm Beach County Main Courthous rth Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 in Courtroom 10-C at which time a Ilo mg matters will be heard: + +Plaintiftt nter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings; + +Response in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings; + +Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings; + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine; + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG Order Specially Setting Hearing + +Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine; + +M' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence as to which Discove der Claims of Privilege with Incorporated Memorandum of + +Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Motion in Limine to Strike\_tliane 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein a ence as to which Discover was withheld under claims of Privilege; + +Defendant/Counter Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against Plaintiff/Counter- efen nt J. and his Counsel. + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the in +- 2. No add-ons are permitted. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to brin to hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. Nth° + +day of DONE ND ORDERED CWest Palm Beach, Palm Beach ounty, Florida, this C\_\_\_ + +MFELE CIR DGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Order Specially Setting Hearing + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +William Chester ██████████, Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Specially Setting I lea ring + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Phone: (954)-467-6767 Fax: (954)-467-3599 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +CO + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. Fax: (954)-337-3716 A SS/ 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-467-1223 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-355 Attorneys for S29,SCR ein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4667fd5cbdd3cbf21e46f59892fb007be963a44a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272/EFTA02760272.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760272.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4311, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 78.565 + ], + [ + 535.5283813476562, + 78.565 + ], + [ + 535.5283813476562, + 120.863037109375 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 120.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SPECIALLY SE IticA FEARING )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 353.12899999999996 + ], + [ + 419.03240966796875, + 353.12899999999996 + ], + [ + 419.03240966796875, + 367.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 367.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 166.04999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760272" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1d904db64e3c283567917d5e0edc3eb12f9e55d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. cps + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL. E-MAIL DESIGNATIONS'AND DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK TO UPDATE ATTOR IlsfORMATION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Ep co-counsel at Link & Rockenbach, P.A. P matter to the following counsel: reby gives notice of the appearance of his irect all pleadings, discovery and orders in this + +> Angela Link & ke bach, P.A. 15 Palm each Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 W t jrn Beach, Florida 33401 S Tel ri one: (561) 727-3600 Facsimile: (561) 727-3601 O Secondary: TanvalalinIcrocklaw.com mary: Angela®linkrocklaw.com + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 7, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Angela M. Many + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. Edwards
██████████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████████, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +Tonja Haddad Coleman 315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling®tonjahaddad.com dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad Haddad & Navarro, PLLC I Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Co-Counsel for Plaintifir/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +W. Chester Jr. W. Chester Jr. P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasstl4gmail.com mah e a Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss A. 250 Australian Avenue S., S West Palm Beach, FL 33 . Co-Counsel for P aintt enter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +A\ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfd494af27205198a32fa901f607b6e5b3da7052 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276/EFTA02760276.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760276.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4365, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE \nOF CO-COUNSEL. E-MAIL DESIGNATIONS'AND DIRECTIONS TO THE \nCLERK TO UPDATE ATTOR IlsfORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 510.091064453125, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 510.091064453125, + 362.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 362.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 374.22 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760276" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b2ef51c965332ff09450b7626dc4b713fe4aa44 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## c o PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF LING AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. IN SUPPORT OF MOTIO/4 FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, BIFURCATION OF TRIAL + +PlaintifKounter-Defendant Jeffre hereby gives notice of the filing of the attached Affidavit of Robert D. Crit upport of his Motion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines ltemative, Bifurcation of Trial. + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Path Primary: Scott@linkrockl~w.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco' inlcrocklaw.com 5- anya®Iinkrocklaw.com Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 7, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +TrirCounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +## CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scakola, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach 1.4eis oulevard West Palm B ch 33409 m Co-Coun endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiteiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROMS IN i ividually, and 'Mt J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +CO S + +## >c) /4- AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT D. CRTI7O114/1, + +BEFORE ME, personally appeared Robert D. Critton, Jr. who, being first duly sworn, deposes and states that: + +- 1. My name is Robert D. Critton, Jr. The statements made in this Affidavit are of my own personal knowledge artd If clilip as a witness I could, and would, testify competently thereto. +- 2. As a result felony investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, in 2008 several civil lawsuits were filed against him. Mr. Epstein retained me to represent his civil interests in those matters. +- 3. In addition, in late 2009, Mr. Epstein retained me to bring this lawsuit against Scott Rothstein, J. and one of the alleged victims relating to their conduct in the victims' litigation. +- 4. I represented Mr. Epstein in this case until June 10, 2010, when I withdrew and was relieved of my duties. + +5. Since my representation terminated, Mr. Epstein has had multiple counsel represent him in this matter. Recently, Mr. Epstein retained the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +6. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. asked to meet with me to discuss the case and to make my files available for review. + +a S- 3O 7. The 30-40-boxes I have relating to this action and the related victims' actions are in storage. Before meeting with Link & Rockenbach, P.A. and providin my files, I need to review them to refresh my recollection and remove unrelated o protected information. Unfortunately, I have a very heavy caseload and will not be ableilitnommit the time necessary for these tasks immediately. I estimate I will need at least a mouth before I will have time to devote to this review. + +8. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) + +COUNTY OF PALM BEACH cc". + +ROBERT D. RITTON, JR. + +The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this flay of 2017, by ROBERT D. CRMUN who is personally known to me and/or produced identification. + +![](_page_4_Picture_8.jpeg) + +• + +Notary Public Print Name: Commission No.: My commission expires: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9ceb9b5abc76d7d1c7d1365e46ed46b7034eb8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/EFTA02760279.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 7176, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.38, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_8.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "c o\nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF LING AFFIDAVIT OF \nROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. IN SUPPORT OF MOTIO/4 FOR CONTINUANCE OF \nTRIAL AND TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, \nBIFURCATION OF TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 325.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 532.553466796875, + 325.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 532.553466796875, + 390.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 390.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ">c) /4-\nAFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT D. CRTI7O114/1,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 293.7203063964844 + ], + [ + 413.2161560058594, + 293.7203063964844 + ], + [ + 413.2161560058594, + 354.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 354.2235412597656 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760279" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/_page_4_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/_page_4_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c023b13abc43006e6045770530a1263ee4cd9f02 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760279/_page_4_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8af174ae836785e4076e02937ba21d03b3051a3d7a28d8f912f384151b1e94a1 +size 13705 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..266adac624df7de838bc557f666a09e5fd4f2d3b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.md @@ -0,0 +1,2244 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. GO + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S EMENTAL MOTION COMPEL DI 1 + +PlaintifdCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ' pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380, moves for an order compel' dant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. a"), to provide complete and res A a swers to interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, September 5, 2017, and October 13 1 n to produce all documents responsive to requests for production dated September 5, October 13, 2017, and in support states: + +#### INTRODUCTION + +is a vic .m. rewards that tit it brings. Although represented alleged sexual abuse victims, and brough gg at nst Epstein on behalf of them, himself, is clearly not a victim despite what he n claims in this lawsuit. To the contrary, fame, fortune and success grew substantially as a direct and proximate result of his multi-faceted litigation with Epstein. is a lawyer who enjoys the spotlight and all of the financial + +This motion supplements Epstein's prior motions to coin el from including Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from filed on September 25, 2017. + +To be clear, Epstein takes no issue with legitimate advocacy on behalf of his clients. However, at the time Epstein filed his abuse of process action against information existed that would lead a reasonably cautious person to have probable cause to allege a connection between and the sinister Ponzi scheme of his law partner, Scott Rothstein. There is no dispute that the Ponzi scheme's continued success was due in part to lawsuits against Epstein and co-defendant Scott Rothstein's law firm, Rothstein dler. As is now well-known, that law firm created and perpetrated a Ponzi scheme that •purported legal settlements of purported legal claims and the sale of interests to inves rs, ultimately resulted in losses of over \$1 billion. As the Ponzi scheme was coming Milstein seized onto the Epstein files to create scintillating civil claims that were n3t/jt.) i;)t sold. Investors were provided "estimates" of the value of purported claims and, up Sip 'n ton and belief, were provided alleged 8 c x details of the cases and evidence that would b s t , tort multi-million-dollar settlements from Epstein. Investors accepted the alleg ts settlements as conveyed by these Florida Bar i scheme stayed alive. licensed attorneys, they invested, + +, while the Ponzi scheme was in MI swing and in dire need appearing to take steps in the Epstein litigations that were beyond The record is clear that of additional investor fun the limits of typi an investor. y for any reasonable litigation attorney, but perhaps very motivating to ' actions appeared to a reasonably cautious person to be an abuse of the process of this whelp fmancially support the continuation of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm, which was, in reality, mostly a Ponzi scheme. For example, filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein based on alleged sexual abuse --- but never served the lawsuit on Epstein. The lawsuit was unnecessary and duplicative of an already existing lawsuit pending in state court. Yet the filing just sat there, in the public records, available for investors to review and use to attempt to calculate present values for anticipated settlements based on numbers and alleged information provided by the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. In other litigations, irrelevant and invasive discovery was pursued -- the type of discovery that makes no sense to an experienced litigator but may be enticing to an investor. sought to turn inside out and upside down every personal and private detail of Epstein's life. In addition, at a desperate point of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, asked the federal court to require Epstein to post a \$15 million bond to secure any potential ' nt claiming that Epstein was fraudulently transferring his assets. The federal court den' in#45rjquest, and noted that the motion was "entirely devoid of evidence of [Epstein's] ce i udulent transfers." abusive tactics were calculated to pressure and h• 'atea as they placed in some of his most valuable social relationships • ntion of improperly extracting a better result in the cases was pursing c ent or through the use of improper, irrelevant and highly prejudicial evidence) and e utilized by the firm as further enticements to their prospective investors in fu the ofr Ponzi scheme. These actions appeared to have no reasonable relationship c !mss to the were not undertaken "in the p a reasonably cautious per have probable cause to perceive such actions as the connected fuel brought on behalf of alleged victims and tice." All of these actions combined would certainly lead feeding the Ponz erne fife at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. + +As w I be monstrated at trial, Epstein had a reasonable belief of the connection between rn\othstein iel based on I) public information from the government and investors caught in the Ponzi scheme; 2) allegations and news reports that Rothstein used cases against Epstein to dupe third parties into investing in non-existent settlements; 3) abusive use of discovery and motions practice; and 4) ME' commencement of a case in federal court when a duplicative case was already pending in state court. + +In response, has counterclaimed for malicious prosecution which he has also used to further grow his public profile and generate business. In so doing, seeks several types of purported damages from Epstein: (a) injury to his reputation; (b) mental anguish, embarrassment, and anxiety; (c) fear of physical injury to himself and members of his family; (d) the loss of value of time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities; and (e) the cost of defending against Epstein's claims. See Fourth Amended Counterclaim. + +While Epstein denies that has stated a claim, and denies has suffered any damages whatsoever, he is nonetheless entitled to discovery o wants to litigate, which include each item of alleged damages, MA;, • 1 esses, and late disclosure of an expert report. As described below, Ed ! , es to provide Epstein with the relevant information he needs and is entitled too its1 ri e requested discovery, which clearly relates to prevented from offering evidence at tri prejudiced in this counterclaim by needs to provide the nt issues in this case, or he needs to be issues. Epstein has been, and continues to be, efusal to comply with his discovery obligations. + +### INTERROGATORIES DARED JULY 12. 2017 — TRIAL WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS + +- 1. On July 1 , Epstein served interrogatories to about v sses i preparation for trial. Exhibit A. insuffi + - 2. ugust 11, 2017, uses. Exhibit B. +- 3. In interrogatory number 1, Epstein asked: seeking information served his answers, which contain incomplete and + +As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +The proper name, address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or other means of contact for each witness. + +4. Preventing Epstein from contacting trial witnesses, failed to provide a single telephone number or e-mail address for any of his 157 witnesses. Instead, provided office addresses, office addresses for attorneys, and, for some witnesses, no addresses at all. It would be impossible for Epstein to attempt to contact 157 trial witnesses by engaging in a letter writing campaign. It is also highly unlikely that the provided mailing addresses are means of contact with these witnesses. The information provided is insufficient, de E tein of his right to contact trial witnesses in this case, and has prevented Epstein f rly preparing for trial. Epstein requests that be compelled to fully respond iding means of contact for every individual identified on his list of trial witnesses. If rmation is not provided by the Court's order, Epstein requests they be stricken from t\ + +5. In interrogatory number 2, Epstei + +As to every individual ident category/group of witn the following: our List of Trial Witnesses, and each ereon, please provide with particularity + +Each contested including identi for Malicious Pro e expected to be addressed by the witness, particularity as to which element(s) of your claim ion this witness's testimony is applicable. + +6. In onset does not identify the factual issues expected to be addressed by each witness. simply provides boilerplate responses, and states that many of the witnesses s the probable cause or malice elements of the malicious prosecution claim, that their inn were true, and that discovery would have provided relevant information. The response is insufficient, and provides Epstein with no notice of the actual factual issues to be addressed at trial by each of these witnesses. + +7. In interrogatory number 3, Epstein asked: + +As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +A detailed description of the testimony expected to be presented at trial by the witness as to each contested factual issue and element of your claim against Epstein. + +8. Instead of answering with a detailed description of the testimony , e pected to be presented at trial by each witness, again provides boilerplate respons states that many of the witnesses will address the probable cause or malice ele the malicious prosecution claim, that their claims were true, and that discovery provided relevant information. This response is insufficient, and provides E ctb ' ) w no notice of the actual testimony expected to be presented at trial by each of th 'tn ) s. q + +e 9. In interrogatory number 4, Epstein ask@i + +10. pon1T, nlaiown at this time which exhibits will be introduced through which witness," is b r c h o re able and insufficient. has several hundred exhibits listed on his exhibit lis :\$11o 150 witnesses. The case is on the eve of trial. It is beyond belief that which trial exhibits he currently "expects" may be introduced into evidence by each witn1 s. While things may certainly change, and it is therefore unknown what exhibits ultimately will be introduced through each witness, that is not the question asked of Epstein is entitled to know, as of this moment in time, view as to which exhibits he expects to introduce into evidence by what witnesses. + +As to every individual identifi List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses th n, please provide with particularity the following: + +A description of the Fribit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into the witness. + +11. In interrogatory number 5, Epstein asked: + +As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit introduced through other means about which the witness is expected to testify, together with a description of the witness' expected testimony regarding each exhibit. + +12. response, "Unknown at this time which exhibits will be introduced through which witness," is, again, both remarkable and nonresponsive. exhibits listed on his exhibit list and over 150 witnesses. On the eve of t which trial exhibits he currently "expects" may be introduced at trial witnesses. It is also unrealistic that has no idea what any of the hundreds of listed exhibits. While things unknown what testimony ultimately will be introduc is Epstein is entitled sS suw,y of this moment in time, position , a t what he expects a witness to testify and what exhibit. question asked of as to exhibits introduced through other the expected testimony will be re, 1 hundred ds must know ed about by certain imony may be regarding ly change, and it is therefore each witness at trial, that is not the + +13. In sum, Edw nses to the interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, contain incomplete and insufficie pones, and deprive Epstein of the right to know the witnesses and evidence to be us responsive m at trial. Epstein requests this Court to compel to provide appropriate responses to the questions posed. + +14. On September 5, 2017, Epstein served interrogatories on M, seeking information about alleged damages. Exhibit C. + +### TERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER 5. 2017- DAMAGES + +15. On October 5, 2017, served his answers, which contain incomplete and insufficient responses. Exhibit D. + +regarding any m whether it re any o 19. Under Flo le of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1), "[p]arties may obtain discovery nvileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of + +16. While all known facts paint the picture that profited immensely from litigation with Epstein, claims to have been damaged by this litigation. As noted above, is claiming damages of: (a) injury to his reputation; (b) mental anguish, embarrassment, and anxiety; (c) fear of physical injury to himself and members of his family; (d) the loss of value of time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities; and (0) the cost of defending against Epstein's claims. See Fourth Amended Counterclaim. + +17. To discover the facts on these issues, Epstein propounded jrrbr ries regarding damages claims, including questions about em story, earnings and net worth, financial compensation agreements relating to his repj rta in Epstein-related cases, and the specific basis for MI damages claim. + +18. responded with almost a S block, objecting and refusing to answer 37 of the 39 interrogatories. x ple, refuses to reveal the ways he profited from litigation with Epstein, the moneypetprade m such litigation, and the money he will likely continue to make in the future litigation. ortment of deals based on his "trademark" Epstein + +20. The information sought is relevant and necessary because is seeking damages for, among other things, injury to reputation and loss of value of time diverted from professional responsibilities. Thus, claims he has lost money as a practicing attorney because he was handling one additional case -- this case — adverse to Epstein. In making such a + +claim, has put his employment history, earnings and net worth at issue, as these issues are relevant to determining whether he has, in fact, suffered a "loss" based on his involvement in this case. + +21. has taken an unreasonable, obstructionist approach to discovery to prevent Epstein from preparing to defend the damages claims at trial. If wants to withdraw his damage claims, Epstein will evaluate and consider a narrowing of the discovery. presently alleged, 'Mr damages claims require the provision of the informatio as requested. + +22. refuses to say where he has worked, what pos d, and what salary he has been paid. See, e.g., interrogatory numbers 1, 2, 3, 6. + +23. While claims he has suffered et 16ss, he refuses to provide any information about any purported loss during the ti ' dRon. See, e.g., interrogatory numbers 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. + +24. While claims t ve S saS'I tered injury to reputation, he refuses to provide information regarding legal work number 20. s obtained and profited from. See, e.g., interrogatory + +Ci.) 25. o provide information regarding how he has profited directly from litigation involvi stem. See, e.g., interrogatory numbers 25, 26, 28, 29. + +26. terrogatory number 32, Epstein directly asked to describe in detail, quanti plain the alleged losses in this case: + +> Please describe in detail, quantify and explain the financial loss, including the amount that you contend to have suffered as described in your Fourth Amended Counterclaim, to wit: + +- a. injury to your reputation; +- b. mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety; +- c. fear of physical injury to you and members of your family; + +d. the loss of value of your time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities; + +e. the cost of defending against Epstein's claims. + +27. On this basic question, which seeks to understand what is claiming in this case, dodges the question and provides no substantive response: + +> RESPONSE: Each of the listed elements of damage is presently unliqu'dated and will be established by the verdict of the jury empaneled to hear case and entrusted with theassibility to render a verdict that full irly compensates for every element of damage by im in the past and continues to be sustained by him in the future will be instructed, there is no exact measure for such damag erdict is required to take all evidence presented to them under n and to be fair, just and reasonable under the circumstances as th fin4 them to exist. + +28. The response is inadequate and fails to info Thy in of the basis for the losses claimed. Epstein asked to describe in detail c t purported losses, to quantify each of the losses he contends to have suffered, and ai them. provide the specific, detailed information thtt uested should be required to + +29. Epstein also asked Ed t his use of Epstein's name to promote his practice. In interrogatory number 34, Ep + +> Please describe tail and identify with specificity every social media out site, blog, printed materials, seminar materials, or any ?,ttier p t or published media on which you, your law firm, or any soma on with which you are affiliated has ever advertised, ( efere s, or otherwise places the name of Jeffrey Epstein, and inchlde a detailed description and the date(s) of each and every such cfcience, advertisement, placement, publication, dissemination, or romotion, identify the persons or groups of persons to whom the same was made, and state the locations where made, and state whether or not the materials used in connection with such reference, advertisement, placement, publication, dissemination, or promotion are in your possession or control, or are still available on line or in print, and identify the persons or website from whom such materials may be obtained. + +30. again, dodges the question: + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. . . . + +31. Obviously, if is publicizing his involvement in litigation adverse to Epstein, has not suffered the damages he claims relating to such litigation. + +32. Moreover, while claimed in his discovery response that such publications were irrelevant, now plans to rely on similar or the very same evidence t lish damage to his reputation, and has made a late disclosure of an expert's report whic n n such evidence. Epstein is entitled to the information requested, and needs the inform e his own expert to testify about the number of people who may have read articles d' sir pstein's allegations tying to the Ponzi scheme. + +33. In interrogatory number 35, Epste dwards about evidence supporting purported damage to reputation: + +> Please describe with part and all evidence, circumstances and events upon whic asserting that your reputation was damaged as alleg Counterclaim, including, without limitation, speci ribing how that damage is attributable to Epstein's lawsu agar you. + +34. er was non-responsive: + +NSEY The allegations of Epstein's maliciously filed t are defamatory per se. + +35 in did not ask for ME opinion as to the potential defamatory nature of the Compla Epstein asked to describe, with particularity, all evidence upon which he relies to assert that his reputation was damaged. should be compelled to provide such information. Alternatively, the jury should be instructed that it cannot consider any evidence in support of purported damage to reputation other than the Complaint in this case. + +36. In interrogatory number 36, Epstein asked about the purported loss of value of time required to be diverted from professional responsibilities: + +> Please explain in detail the amount of time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities including, but not limited to, the time lost, each date on which the time was lost, the case/matter on which you would have otherwise spent the time, your billable hourly rate, if any, you allege to have lost, and for each case/matter identified, please provide the amount of come derived by you, your firm, or any entity acting on your behalf in the atter. Please detail all other evidence, methods and calculations on which end to rely to quantify the damages you claim are attributable to div ed from your professional responsibilities as alleged in your C im. + +37. response is woefully deficient: + +RESPONSE: Time diverted from Bradl responsibilities is reflected in previously p updated prior to the expiration of discov objects to the interrogatory.... ' professional e records and will be ter-Plaintiff, however, + +38. refers Epstein to time , but provides no information as to the case/matter on which he would have otherwi nt e time, his billable hourly rate allegedly lost, and the amount of income derived on tter. Nor does provide evidence, methods and calculations pursuant to wh' c: e dw tifies the purported damages. The information requested is relevant and necessary to defe ards' claim that he was damaged by spending time on this matter. shquld co polled to provide such information. Alternatively, the jury should be instructed it'rnot consider any evidence in support of purported loss of value of time required ed from professional responsibilities. + +39. In sum, responses to the interrogatories dated September 5, 2017, are incomplete and insufficient. Epstein has been, and continues to be, prejudiced by IM refusal to provide relevant information pursuant to the discovery process. The Court should compel to provide responsive, full, and appropriate responses to the questions posed. Alternatively, + +the Court should prohibit from presenting evidence to the jury that was not disclosed in response to corresponding discovery requests. + +### REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION DATED SEPTEMBER 5. 2017 - DAMAGES + +40. On September 5, 2017, Epstein served a request for production on seeking documents about damages claims. Exhibit E. + +41. On October 5, 2017, and made boilerplate objections. Exhibit F. served his response, which object 10 requests + +42. With respect to Request number 1, Epstein sought: + +A copy of all documents that relate to, or refer information requested in, or that you referred responses to, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. contemporaneously herewith. or Jude, any and all way in providing your tein's Interrogatories to lating to Damages, served + +O IS + +43. objected to Request nprn I the basis of attorney work product. + +44. objection lacks it pstein is entitled to all documents that relate to, reference, or support the basis for )positions on the issues presented by the interrogatories. See, e.g., Grinnell Corp. v. Pal 21 Ocean Blvd., Ltd., 924 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The work product doctrine do protect the documents that have been requested, and should be ordered to pro them immediately. + +45. ests numbers 2-10 directly relate to the issue of damages claimed by + ++ . A copy of all documents that reflect, any and all promises, instruments, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any business arrangements between you and any and all law firms through which you rendered legal services at any time during the period in question, including, without limitation, cost sharing, fee splitting, fee percentage, profit sharing and/or profit participation terms and conditions including, but not limited to, your provision of legal services during your affiliation with Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler. + +3. A copy of all documents reflecting, any and all instruments, agreements, contracts, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all trust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements or similar arrangements established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. + +4. A copy of all documents reflecting, any and all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all arrangements that you and/or your law firm and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm have or at any time during the period in question had with LM, EW, or Jane Doe, which in any way relate to allegations by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. + +5. A copy of all documents reflecting, any and all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all arrangements that you, any law firm through which you have provided legal services, [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm have or at any time during the period in question had with any and all attorneys, investigators, other professionals, contractors and consultants and witnesses with respect to this case or any other case involving the claims of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. + +6. A copy of all documents reflecting, and all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic + +format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all arrangements that Paul Cassell, Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA, or Boies Schiller Flexner LLP have or at any time during the period in question had with any and all attorneys (including, without limitation, you, any law firm through which you then rendered legal services, and [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL), investigators, other professionals, contractors and consultants and witnesses with respect to this case and any other case involving the claims of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. + +7. A copy of all documents, including, without limitation, checks, wire transfer instructions, wire transfer confirmations, bank statements, email confirmations, Notices of Distribution and other documents, reflecting any and all payments or distributions made by you, any law firm through which you provided legal services and/or Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL regarding the proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection with the claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including, without limitation, payments or distributions made to or for the benefit of LM, EW or Jane Doe (including, without limitation, to any trusts or similar arrangements or accounts of which any of LM, EW, or Jane Doe were then beneficiaries), payments made to Paul Cassell, payments made to any other law firm or individual lawyer, payments made to investigators, consultants, advisors, or other professionals, payments made to other contractors and payments made to witnesses. + +8. A copy of all documents, including, without limitation, checks, wire transfer instructions, wire transfer confirmations, bank statements, email confirmations, Notices of Distribution and other documents, reflecting in respect of the proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection with the claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against him any and all amounts retained by or allocated to you, any law firm through which you then provided legal services, and/or [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL as reimbursement of costs and expenses or in payment for legal services rendered. + +9. A copy of all documents reflecting payments by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any + +other lawyer and/or law firm to L.M., E.W., Jane Doe, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]), any investigators, paraprofessionals, other attorneys, other contractors or persons (including, without limitation, witnesses, publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, other media outlets or entities engaged in similar business), which payments in any way relate to any federal or Florida state cases against Jeffrey Epstein or any other claims against Jeffrey Epstein in which you or your clients were involved. + +10. A copy of all documents reflecting payments made to you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm, or made to or for the benefit of L.M. E.W., Jane Doe, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]), by any investigators, paraprofessionals, other attorneys, other contractors or other persons (including, without limitation, publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, other media outlets or entities engaged in similar business), which payments in any way relate to any federal or Florida state cases against Jeffrey Epstein or any other claims or allegations against Jeffrey Epstein in which you or your clients were involved. + +46. [REDACTED] offers the same boilerplate objection to Requests numbers 2-10, claiming they are overly broad, seek information that is irrelevant and immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, requests attorney work product and attorney-client materials, and is protected by rights to financial privacy. + +47. Edwards claims to have suffered losses in the form of injury to reputation; mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety; fear of physical injury; loss of value of time required to be diverted from professional activities; and cost of defense. + +48. These requests are all reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence on these damages issues. [REDACTED] financial privacy objection lacks merit because [REDACTED] seeks damages relating to his alleged injury to those same finances (i.e., he was unable to devote more time to professional activities that allegedly caused him losses). + +49. The Court should compel to produce all documents responsive to the request for production dated September 5, 2017. + +### EXPERT WITNESS DISCOVERY DATED OCTOBER 13. 2017 + +50. On October 13, 2017, Epstein served expert witness discovery on which consisted of interrogatories and a request for production. Exhibits G and H, respectively. + +51. In the request to produce, Epstein sought customary expert disci formation, including copies of depositions of expert taken in other acti rendered by experts applicable to any issues in this case, corresponds and any experts, documents furnished or made available to documents considered or reviewed by expert or upon which in evaluating, investigating or formulating his or her opinions. + +52. In response to this discovery, rovidcd only a portion of the requested documentation and failed to provide a w nse to the specific requests. + +53. Instead, stein: + +Please confirm ip f the materials provided by Dropbox, and further confirm that th aterials, together with Dr. Jansen's report and the informatio osed last week regarding Dr. Jansen, satisfy the expert witn d' v ry you recently propounded. If there is anything else you be e you eed, please let me know with specificity what that is. + +54. ' response to Epstein's expert discovery is inappropriate and insufficient. + +irst, Epstein cannot confirm that the materials fully satisfy the request for production because only knows the universe of responsive documents. + +56. Second, upon review of the documents did provide, it appears that failed to provide documentation in response to several of the requests, including: + +- a. Copies of Jansen's deposition transcripts (RFP 1) +- b. Correspondence between IMIM counsel and Jansen (RFP 3) + +- c. Copies of all materials made available to Jansen (RFP 4) +- d. Copies of all materials Jansen relied upon (RFP 5) +- e. Any other information reviewed by Jansen (RFP 6) +- f. All documents or tangible items pertaining to the scope of employment of Jansen and compensation for his services (RFP 7q) +- g. All documents or tangible items pertaining to the percentage income earned as an expert witness (RFP 7e) +- h. Records of payments made to Jansen by t omeys in the last ten years (RFP 8) +- i. Documents created by Jansen in connectio case (RFP 10) +- j. Copies of Jansen's publications (RFP +- k. Jansen's draft opinions (RFP 1 +- 1. Jansen's fee schedule (RFc hi +- m. Copies of Jansen's r ex reports (RFP 14) +- n. Copies of any fining to Jansen (including orders on Ftye or Daubert mptfb P 15) +- o. Statement dNefisen's compensation, rate, amount paid to date, amount ate, and an estimate of the amount of time Jensen expects n the case moving forward (Interrogatory 15a-b) subject matter of Jensen's opinions in other cases (Interrogatory + +urther, has failed to respond to all of the expert witness interrogatories. + +58. responses to the expert witness discovery served on October 13, 2017, are incomplete and insufficient. On the eve of trial, Epstein once again is being prejudiced by refusal to provide relevant information pursuant to the discovery process. The Court should compel to provide responsive, full, and appropriate responses to the expert witness discovery. Alternatively, the Court should prohibit from presenting purported expert witness testimony at trial. + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated above, this Court should grant Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery. + +Wherefore, Epstein respectfully requests that this Court compel e complete and responsive answers to interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, September d October 13, 2017, and to produce all documents responsive to requests for produ on eptember 5, 2017, and October 13, 2017, and grant such other and further relief ash Co deems just and proper. + +### ERTIFICATE OF S + +I certify that the foregoing document has Service List below on November 7, 2017, throu Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). to the attorneys listed on the s e-filing portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 5 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanva(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®IinIcrocIdaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE H1 1EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 0408003OOO(MA° + +v. + +I. a, et al., + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING /14RR c GATORIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through hii undersigned counsel, hereby certifies that the original of this Notice was filed with the Court and a copy of the Notice, together with the original Interrogatories, was propounded to through his counsel by electronic service, to be answered under oath within the time prescribed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, this July 12, 2017. + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +C' + +/s/ Tonia Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 Tonja Haddad, PA 5315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954A67.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com Efiling@TonjaHaddad.com + +#### SERVICE LIST + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OCXXMBAG + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsz@searcylaw.com; mep@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +CO + +Marc Nurilc, Esq. "SC 1 East Broward Blvd. ) Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +J. . Esq. athtojustice.com br ?14/> A Jaffe Weissing 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fist + +Fred Haddad, Esq. Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja@toujahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +v. + +J. et al., JUDGE: HAFE + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S INTERROGATORIES TO BRADLEY + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure hereby propounds the following Interrogatories on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff this July 12, 2017. + +It is requested that the aforesaid answers be served upon Epstein within thirty (30) days of today's date. + +#### INTERROGATORIES + +As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +- 1. The proper name, address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or other means of contact for each witness: + +ANSWER: + +- 2. Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by the witness, including identifying with particularity as to which element(s) of your claim for Malicious Prosecution this witness's testimony is applicable: + +ANSWER: + +iS 4)C) + +- 3. A detailed description of the testimicpct ny ed to be presented at trial by the witness as to each contested factual issue and element of your claim against Epstein: + +ANSWER: + +- 4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by the witness: + +ANSWER: + +- 5. A description of the Trial Exhibit List n ber of each exhibit introduced through other means about which the witness is expected to testify, together with a description of the witness' expected testimon arcling eachexhibit: + +ANSWER: C.) + +A S tar + ++it-) + +STATE OF + +COUNTY OF + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017 by who is personally known to meorwho has produced as identificatio ho did/did not take an oath. + +C + +iS)C) (SEAL) (Notary signature) + +(Notary name - print) NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florid + ++6s + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES +PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded by the Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, on July 12, 2017, which have been furnished to the attorneys for the Counter-Defendant. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11TH day of AUGUST, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmecann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES +PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded by the Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, on July 12, 2017, which have been furnished to the attorneys for the Counter-Defendant. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11th day of AUGUST, 2017. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mm@cann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mm@cann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +[marc@nuriklaw.com](mailto:marc@nuriklaw.com) +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### INTERROGATORIES + +As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +1. The proper name, address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or others o'iVcontact for each witness: + +### ANSWER: CO + +| | DESCRIPTION GE SES | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2-3 (Expected to refuse to testify on | c e t of the claim for Malicious Prosecution). Consistent | +| 2 | (formerly Kell | +| damages. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by | against Epstein, the likelihood | +| that the dips, | very conducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects | +| of the vaus sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by | at the time, including on the issue of | +| 3. a4, a Marcinkova | | +| c Mica Dubno | | +| 2-3 Expected to testify about each element of malicious prosecution except bonafide | | +| cases being prosecuted by | at the time, including on the issue of punitive | +| dams es | Sub ect to assertions of privilege | +| 4. do Stan Pottinger | | + +#### DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES + +49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of .robable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the va 'ous sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the e of punitive dame es through her own knowledge and experiences with Epstei + +. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. O MINTZ & GOLD LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, New York 10016 C ) + +2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecined by Edwards against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have,,re \st4t,1 in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by Edwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive dame :es through her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein. ls ,), + +6. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. MINTZ & GOLD LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floo New York, 10016 + +> 2-3 Expected to testi about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the Dal of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery cot{ducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual\ 6iffe cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages,through her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein. + +7 Nadia °Olt 13 I I i erside Drive, Suite 800 i . oaks, CA 91423-2449 + +> -3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and alice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the issue of punitive dam es throu:h her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein. + +8. do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA, 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800, MIAMI, FL 33131 + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

| +| 9. |

Robert Josefsberg, Esquire
PODHURST ORSECK, PA,
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800,
MIAMI, FL 33131

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by Edwards against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by Edwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will confirm the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

| +| 10. |

Detective [REDACTED] Recarey
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.

| +| 11. |

Chief Michael Reiter
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.

| +| 12. |

John Connolly
c/o [REDACTED] & Schuster
1230 6th Avenue
New York, New York 10020

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of

| + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. | +| 13. | Charles Lichtman, Esquire
350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 | +| | 2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify as to the falsity of the claims made by Epstein against Edwards and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions. | +| 14. | William Scherer, Esquire
633 S Federal Hwy #800
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 | +| | 2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify as to the falsity of the claims made by Epstein against [REDACTED]. | +| 15. | Antonio [REDACTED] (Tony)
Palm Coast, Florida | +| | 2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through his own knowledge and experiences with Epstein. | +| 16. | Records Custodian of Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 17. | Records Custodian of United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida | +| 18. | Records Custodian of the Federal Bureau of Investigations | +| 19. | Spencer Kuvin, Esquire
1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 | +| | 2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions. | +| 20. | Theodore Leopold, Esquire
2925 PGA Boulevard
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 | + +• + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

| +| 21. |

Rinaldo Rizzo
c/o Robert [REDACTED]
228 East 45th Street 17th Floor
New York, NY 10017

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by Edwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through his own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

| +| 22. |

Adam Horowitz, Esquire
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

| +| 23. |

Isidro M. [REDACTED], Esquire
[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

| +| 24. |

All of the Lawyers who Represented Victims of Jeffrey Epstein.

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of

| + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions. | +| WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF NEED ARISES | | +| | 2-3. Each of the witnesses listed below as numbered 25-157 (with the exception of records custodians) has information pertaining to the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. If called, each could provide information regarding the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, and the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. | +| 25. | [REDACTED]
1040 South Shore Drive
Miami Beach, FL 33141 | +| 26. | Landon [REDACTED]
c/o New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018 | +| 27. | Oren Kramer
c/o Boston Provident, L.P.
717 5th Avenue #12A
New York, NY 10022 | +| 28. | [REDACTED] LaVecchio
United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida
Broward Financial Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions. | +| 29. | [REDACTED]
c/o Brad Edwards, [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing
425 North Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 | +| 30. | Evgenia Ignatieva
1650 Broadway, #910
New York, NY 10019 | +| 31. | Anouska [REDACTED]
536 N. Edinburgh Avenue,
Los Angeles, CA 90048 | +| 32. | Angelique [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 33. | [REDACTED]
c/o Jack Scarola
SEARCY DENNEY, ET AL. | + +| | 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 34. | c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 | | +| 35. | Brandy Brenson c/o Spencer Kuvin | | +| | 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA | 4 11.14\" :) | +| | 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131 | C5 | +| 37. | c/o Spencer Kuvin | ' | +| | West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 | 4(I P ) 1800 South Australian Ave #400 | +| 38. | c/ Esq. JAFFE, WEISSING 425 N ANDREWS AVE., S Fr. LAUDERDALE, FL | | +| 39. | Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University S | | +| | Lake Slt City Utah, 8 12 | | +| 40. | c/o Adam Horo | | +| | FARMEEIAF VEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ^REWS AVE., SUITE 2 | | +| | FT ERDALE, FL 33301 | | +| 41. | Da res | | +| | 1 Clark Street | | +| | Hilli odCA 90069 | | +| 42. | leis c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 | | +| 43. | c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 | | + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES MIAMI FL 33131 | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ' | do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 45. | Prince Andrew Albert Christian of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW1A IAA Frederic Feklcai Address Current! Unknown | +| 47. | CA) do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 48. | Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 | +| 49. | Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 West Palm Beach, FL 33 | +| 50. | do Adam Horowitz | +| | JAFFE, G, ET AL. | +| | 425 N ANDRE AVE., SUITE 2 | +| | FT. LAUDERD L 33301 | +| 51. | Leigh Sk atri | +| | do Ro sefsberg, Esq. | +| | PO RSECK, PA | +| | F GLER STREET, STE 800 L 33131 | +| 52. | eager' Dorshel • Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131 | +| 53. | do Adam Horowitz JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 54. | do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 55. | Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach FL 38480 O C) | +| 57. | do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA, | +| | /c ) 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131 | +| 58. | do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 3340 | +| 59. | do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suit Miami, FL 33128 | +| 60. | Jason Richards | +| | Federal Bureau Investigation | +| | 16320 NW 2nd A ., IAMI, FL 33169 | +| 61. | Shawna era | +| | do Bra e dwards, Esq. | +| | F J FE, WEISSING, ET AL. | +| | A 'REWS AVE., SUITE 2, ERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 62. | ca JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. | +| 63. | do Adam Horowitz FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 64. | do Adam Horowitz FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 65. | do Adam Horowitz , JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 66. | Nezbitt Kurkendall | +| | Federal Bureau of Investigation O 'S C 16320 NW 2" AVE. MIAMI FL 33169 | +| 67. | ' do Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. | +| | 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 'S West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 | +| 68. | Igor Zinoview Address Crrently Unknown | +| 69. | ( S" Address Current) Unknown | +| 70. | 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021 | +| 71. | Seth Lehrman 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 72 | Matt Weissing 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 | +| | Fr. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 73. | Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, 11400 | +| | West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Will also confirm the er ip role played by in the prosecution | +| | of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of actions. | +| 74. | Any additional individuals identified as victims by the United states Attorney's Office and whose | +| 75. | Leslie Wexner Three Limited Parkway | +| 76 | Donald Trump c/o Alan Garten, Esq. 725 Fifth Avenue | + +I + +t + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | New York, NY 10022. Subject to the assertions of privilege | +| 77. | Larry Visoski
1131 PINE POINT ROAD
RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 78. | Maritza Vasquez
1293 SW 21 st Terrace
Miami, FL 33145 | +| 79. | Maximilia [REDACTED]
C/O ATTORNEY WILLIAM UNROCH
140 WEST END, APT 30-BW
NEW YORK, NY 10023 | +| 80. | [REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 | +| 81. | [REDACTED]
2915 SHARE RD 111
TALLAHASSEE, FL 31312 | +| 82. | [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 83. | David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin)
11675 GLOWING SUNSET LN
LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 | +| 84. | [REDACTED]
12247 72ND CT N
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412 | +| 85. | Michael Fisten
Weston, FL | +| 86. | Russell Adler
Delray Beach, FL | +| 87. | Marie Alessi
6791 FAIRWAY LAKES DR.
BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472 | +| 88. | Janusz Banasiak
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH FL, 33480 | +| 89. | Beata Banasiak
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, FL 33480 | + +| 90. 91. 92. | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES Juan Alessi 6791 FAIRWAY LAKES DR. BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472 Michael 53320 AVENIDA MADERO LA QUINTA CA 92253 Jerry Goldsmith 13285 SILVER FOX LN WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33418-7942 4•4' Rosalie | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 93. | 53320 AVENIDA MADERO LA QUINTA CA 92253 | +| 94. | Valdson Cotrin C Y Address Currently Unknown | +| 95. | 301 E 66TH ST APT 11P NEW YORK, NY 10065 | +| 96. | Cecelia Unknown South Africa | +| 97. | Glenn 1040 5TH AVE UNIT 15A NEW YORK, NY 10028-0137 | +| 98. | Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway | +| | Columbus, Ohio 43206 ) | +| 99. | Officer Munyan | +| | Palm Beach Police De ent 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 100. | Officer Minot Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 101 | Sgt. Sorge Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach FL 33480 | +| 103. | Arnold Paul Prospari 215 WESTMINSTER RD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405-1654 | + +I + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 104. | ill Pagnano FLAGLER DR STE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 105. | Stephan Kosslyn 28 GARFIELD ST | +| | CAMBRIDGE • 02138-1802 | +| 106. | Cecile Dejongh 23 8 ESTATE MAFOLIE I | +| | ST VI 00802 Tommy Mottola | +| 107 | AS' . 302 CARIBBEAN RD PALM BEACH FL 33480-3012 | +| 108. | Mike Sanka 449 S BEVERLY DR STE 101 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 | +| 109. | IIIIIIIL105 'S C4A) ) | +| 110. | William "Bill | +| | 5645 CORAL 1 DR # 391 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076 | +| III. | Howard Rubenstein 1345 AVENUE OF THE AM NEW YORK, NEW YORK 101 | +| 112. | Robert Meister | +| | 101 SEMINOLE AVE i PALM BEACH FL 33480,1 | +| 113. | Todd Meister 101 SEMINOLE AVE PALM BEACH, FL 33480 | +| 114. | President William J. Clinton | +| 115. | William Hammond aM.Fontana Place | +| | = Palm Beach, FL | +| 116. | Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, 0250 West Palm Beach, Florida | +| 117 | Michele Pagan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 | + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | Michele Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 119. | Amy Fortimer
12309 N OLD COUNTRY RD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414 | +| 120. | [REDACTED]
345 SOUTH ST APT 6E
NEW YORK, NY 10009 | +| 121. | [REDACTED]
371 NW TRESCO WAY APT 208
JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957 | +| 122. | [REDACTED]
5159 Kingston Court,
West Palm Beach, Florida | +| 123. | [REDACTED]
9 PINTA RD
MIAMI FL 33133-2607 | +| 124. | Latasha Lowe
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | +| 125. | [REDACTED]
115 Sunshine Blvd
West Palm Beach, Florida | +| 126. | Zack Bryan
1150 Larch Way
Wellington, Florida | +| 127. | [REDACTED]
223 W AVENUE 37
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065-3241 | +| 128. | Larry
11148 COLLEEFIELD DR.
WELLINGTON, FL 33449 | +| 129. | Story Cowles
801 S OLIVE AVE UNIT 201S
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 130. | Alan Dershowitz
26 RESERVOIR ST
CAMBRIDGE, [REDACTED] 02138
or
TUDOR CITY PL | + +| DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | | +|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | APT 7K
NEW YORK, NY 10017. Subject to assertions of privilege | +| 131. | Michael Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480 | +| 132. | Salaam Kahlid Monroe
119 MENORES AVE APT 3
CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 | +| 133. | Jelitza Negrette
503 CHANDLERS WARF
PORTLAND, ME 04101 | +| 134. | Sergia [REDACTED]
825 BRICKELL BAY DR., #1141
MIAMI, FL 33131 | +| 135. | Cassandra [REDACTED]
5011 EL CLARK CIRCLE
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 | +| 136. | Randee Speciale
PALM BEACH VICTIM SERVICES
205 N DIXIE HIGHWAY # 5.1100
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | +| 137. | [REDACTED]
Address Currently Unknown | +| 138. | Steven Hoffenberg
Address Currently Unknown | +| 139. | Michael Stroll
Address Currently Unknown | +| 140. | Douglas Shoettle
243 Riverside, Dr.
New York, NY 10025 | +| 141. | Ghislaine Maxwell
Address Currently Unknown | +| 142. | Records Custodian
Amazon | +| 143. | Records Custodian
Yellow Cab | +| 144. | Records Custodian
Citrix Systems, Inc. | +| 145. | Records Custodian
Federal Bureau of Investigation | +| 146. | Records Custodian
Milton Girls Juvenile Facility | + +| | DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 5770 EAST MILTON ROAD
MILTON, FL | +| 147. | Records Custodian
School District of Palm Beach County
3344 FOREST ██████ BLVD, SUITE C-124
West Palm Beach, FL 33406 | +| 148. | Records Custodian
St. Mary's Medical Center
901 45 th STREET
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| 149. | Records Custodian
WELLINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL
10104 FORREST ██████ BLVD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414 | +| 150. | All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff, Jane Doe. | +| 151. | All rebuttal witnesses. | +| 152. | All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. | +| | WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION | +| 153. | Mark Epstein
30 VANDAM STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10013 | +| 154. | ██████ (Adriana Mucinska)
St. Mary's Medical Center, Esq. | +| 155. | Louella Rabuyo
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, FL 33480 | +| 156. | Alfredo Rodriguez
11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL
C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons | +| 157. | Scott Rothstein
c/o Mark Nurik
One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | + +2. Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by the witness, including identifying with particularity as to which element(s) of your claim for MaliciousProsecution this witness's testimony is applicable: + +ANSWER: See response to number 1. + +3. A detailed description of the testimony expected to be presented at tr contested factual issue and element of your claim against Epstein: tness as to each + +ANSWER: See response to number 1. + +4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List numb., ,,"lip s,, Gexhibit Cexpected to be introduced into evidence by the witness: + +ANSWER: Unknown at this time w )(bib will be introduced through which witness. + +5. A description of the Trial about which the witness s expec testimony regarding each t: ist number of each exhibit introduced through other means to testify, together with a description of thewitness' expected + +ANSWER: U n at Ibis time the exhibits about which each witness will testify. + +STATE OF Florida +COUNTY OF Broward + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11th day of +August, 2017 by Brad Edwards, who is personally known +to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did +not take an oath. + +*X* [Handwritten signature] + +(SEAL) +*[Handwritten signature]* +(Notary signature) + +Maria Kellichian +(Notary name - print) +NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +![](_page_51_Picture_15.jpeg) + +![](_page_51_Picture_16.jpeg) + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +v. Aft, + +J. et al., JUDGE: HAFe + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +C + +#### e NOTICE OF ROGATORIES + +PROPOUNDINGit, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epst 14e/ i \* %n"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby certifies that the original of No was filed with the Court and a copy of the Notice, together with the original Inte was propounded to through his counsel by electronic servic C a4 swered under oath within the time prescribed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedu September 5, 2017. + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +Tonja Haddad, PA + +5315 SE 7th Street + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +954.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com + +Efiling@TonjaHaddad.com + +#### SERVICE LIST + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +J. Esq. abra mthtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Fis 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Fred Haddad, Esq. 315 SE 7th Street, S e 30 Dee@FredHaddadLaw.c Fort Lauderdale, 3301 + +Tonja Had Tonja@ton Law 315 SE 7th Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein an, Esquire d.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. treet, Suite 301 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J, Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1,11•TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +"St\ + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OGATORIES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLE J. ARDS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, by and his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Pr ereby propounds the attached interrogatories upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ME, and requests answers thereto in accordance with the applicable Flo ' a R of Civil Procedure. A copy of Certification has been filed with the Court as provi in Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + +### DEFi1i61J AND INSTRUCTIONS + +### DEFINITIONS + +1. "Documen `documents" include, but are not limited to, all paper material of any kind, whether , printed, punched, filmed or made in any way; recording tapes or wires, film, phot s, movies or any graphic matter however produced or reproduced; and all mechanical o sound recordings or transcripts thereof. + +ecord" includes, but is not limited to, all books of account or other books of every kind, jou alss,edgers, statements, instruments, files, messages, writings of every kind, and other internal or Cher data and other information of every description made or received by you in the regular course of business or otherwise, regardless of the mode in which it is recorded; the original of any such record includes the data or the information comprising a record stored or transmitted in or by means of any electronic, computerized, mechanized, or other information storage or retrieval or transmission system or device which can, upon request, generate, regenerate, or transmit the precise date or other information comprising the record, and an original also includes the visible date or other information so generated, regenerated, or transmitted if it is legible or can be made legible by enlargement or other process. + +3. "Identify" or "identification" when used in reference to an individual person means to state their full name, present address (business and residential), if known, and his present employment position and business affiliation, electronic mail addresses and telephone numbers for home and/or business, if known. When used in reference to a person other than an individual person, "identify" or "identification" means to state whether that person is a corporation, partnership, or other organization, and the name, present and last known address, principle place of its business and its telephone number. Once any person has been properly identifier, it shall be sufficient thereafter when identifying that person to state only their name. + +4. "Identify" or "identification" when used in reference to a d or documents means to state the date, the author of (or, if different, the signor or signo ddress, type of document (e.g., letter, memorandum, telegram, chart, sketch or dia y other means of identifying with sufficient particularity to meet the requirements for in usion in a request for production of documents pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florid' ivil Procedure. If any such document was, but no longer is, in your possession o to your control, state what disposition was made of it and the reason for that disposi • of identifying any document, a true and correct copy may be annexed to and incorpo answers to these interrogatories. If any such document has already been produced, o rence to the document is necessary to enable its identification. + +5. "You" or "your" or "Edward ei s'6 J, , and any entity owned or controlled by J. di rectly, and any agents, representatives and any other person or entity directly or in on his behalf. When this definition is specifically or rev terest therein, that is held a in the name of rein, to the extent that there exists an asset or item of income, profit referred to in any interrogatory pro spouse, for the benefit of Edw ouse, in a trust under which 1 pS . ot a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of an er person in circumstances under which spouse has the use, enjoyment or ben e same or can exercise effective control over the same or (b) in the name of a depen nt c f for the benefit of a dependent child of , in trust under which Ed ndent child is a beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances ich de ndent child has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same, or (c under which is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in ces under which has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can ex • ective control over the same, and such asset, liability, or item of income, profit or revenue Id have been included in response to that interrogatory as being held directly or indirectly by or for benefit, but for the fact that an action, request, instruction or direction previously made by or on behalf of resulted in such asset, liability, or item of income, profit or revenue being delivered, allocated, distributed, or transferred to and held as provided in clause (a), (b) or (c) of this definition no. 5, instead of being delivered, allocated, distributed, or transferred to and held by , then for the purposes of determining whether to include such asset, liability or item of income, profit or revenue, or interest therein, in the response to that interrogatory, when "you" or "your" or ME' is used to refer to the ownership thereof, such term shall also refer to any of the circumstances described in clause (a), (b) or (c) of this definition no. 5. + +- 6. "Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff' refers to J. +- 7. "Counterclaim" refers to the Counterclaim filed by Epstein. +- 8. "Communication" means and includes any oral or written exchange of words, thoughts or ideas to any other person(s), whether person to person, in a group, by t phone, by letter, by telex or by any other process, electric, electronic or otherwise. All such nications in writing shall include, without limitation, printed, typed, handwritten ther readable documents, correspondence, diaries, logbooks, minutes, notes, studies, su forecasts. +- 9. "Person" means and includes any natural perso association, firm, or any other private organization, governmental a the plural. +- 10. "Refer," "relate," "related," or "relati warranting, prove, proving or tending to prove, dispro or containing, constitute or constituting, describe o or assessing, record or recording. against Jeffrey ration, partnership, r entity, and includes and includes warrant or ing, tending to disprove, contain g, referring, state or stating, assess +- 11. "And" or "or" shall be cons nctively and disjunctively so as to require the broadest possible response to any paysrlar est. +- 12. At all times used h hrase "period in question" shall refer to January 1, 2006 to present. form. + - 13. Words shall be collbtfhed either in the singular or plural and masculine or feminine + +A. Yo shall answer each interrogatory separately and fully in writing under oath, unless yo it, in which event you shall state the reasons for your objection and shall answe tent the interrogatory is not objectionable. + +### INSTRUCTIONS + +B. An interrogatory otherwise proper is not objectionable merely because the answer involves an opinion or contention that relates to a fact or calls for a conclusion or asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. You shall respond to such an interrogatory by giving the information that you have and the source on which the information is based. + +C. You shall not leave any part of an interrogatory unanswered merely because you have interposed an objection to another part of the interrogatory. + +D. Where you object to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof, the objection shall state with specificity all grounds. Any ground not stated in an objection shall be waived. + +E. Where you assert a claim of privilege in objecting to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof, and you do not provide an answer on the basis of such assertion: + +1. The attorney asserting the privilege shall in the obj n to the interrogatory or sub-part thereof identify the nature of the privilege (includin roduct) which is being claimed and if the privilege is being asserted in connection wi m r defense governed by state law, indicate the state's privilege rule being invoked; an + +2. The following information shall be provid (abjection, unless divulgence of such information would cause disclosure of the alleg leged information: + +a. For documents: (1) the type of t; (2) general subject matter of the document; (3) the date of the document; (4) such o 1 fo ion as is sufficient to identify the document for a subpoena duces return, induct' appropriate, the author of the document, the addressee of the document, and, wheftn nt, the relationship of the author and addressee to each other; + +b. For oral co cati s: (I) the name of the person making the communication and the names of person hile the communication was made and, where not apparent, the relationship of the ent to the person making the communication; (2) the date and place of communican subject matter of the communication. + +F. You are to sign ers, and your attorney is to sign any objections. + +G. You shall copy of the answers, and objections if any, within the time limits prescribed by Rule th Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + +#### DAMAGES INTERROGATORIES TO + +1. State the full name, address, telephone number and description of business for each of your employers (including as an independent contractor, if applicable), at any time during the period in question, and for each employer provide the dates of employment, nature of work, title, position, salary, and description of your duties for such employer, as well as any changes in title, position or duties during your employment during the period in question, any termination thereof and the reasons for such change. + +RESPONSE: + +(S SA 2. State the full name, address, telephone number, type of entity (i ludi g, without limitation, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability .. ...ra , sole proprietorship or other entity) and description of the business conducted of eac s enterprise with which you have been affiliated as a principal (including as an own , director, partner, manager, member, shareholder, or in any similar capacity) at any the period in question, as well as the dates of such affiliation, the nature of such any changes during the period in question in the nature of such affiliation, and the f such changes, as well as any income, profits, distributions, salary, commission, or connection with such affiliation. + +RESPONSE: + +3. State the full name, companies, partnerships, other entities or b ess e question as a me member, an a state the d email any pa received fo ress and telephone number of all corporations, limited liability partnerships, limited liability corporations, sole proprietorships rprises for which you have served at any time during the period in of the Board of Directors, a member of the Board of Trustees, a committee and member, a member of senior management, or in some similar capacity, ce, describe the capacity in which you served, state the full name, address, elephone number of each person to whom you reported in such capacity, and if t, compensation, fee, honorarium, other remuneration or other consideration was such service, state the nature (whether cash or other consideration), frequency, dates, and amounts thereof, and state the dates such service terminated, if applicable, and any reasons therefor. + +RESPONSE: + +4. Identify each person or entity for whom you performed services for a fee amounting to \$5,000 or more, or on a contingency basis or under some other financial arrangement during the period in question, and provide the dates of service, the nature of the services performed, the terms of the business arrangement with respect to the performance of such services, the dates of any payments for such services and the amounts paid or the amounts owed for such services, and identify the person or persons to whom or which such amounts were paid or such amounts are owed. If you performed such services through a law firm, state the name of the law firm through which you performed such services in addition to the other information requested herein. + +#### RESPONSE: + +5. At any time during the period in question did you have any interest in a corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited Habil\* • o including, without limitation, professional service entities? each such entity, the dates on which you held your inte such interest, if applicable, all amounts and other conside and all amounts and consideration received, directlyprindite interest and in connection with the disposition of, and telephone numbers of all other controlling managers, seniors, trust protectors, trustees above in preparing the response to this i any time on or after December 7, 2 ownership thereof at any time on o O SA (5%) percent or more y, trust or other entity, to the name and address of es on which you disposed of u paid to acquire such interest, • y, in connection with holding such ntcrest, and include the names, addresses rs, partners, members, officers, directors, ciaries of such entity. See definition no. 5 with respect to any such interest acquired at uch interest in which there was a change in the ember 7, 2009. + +#### RESPONSE: + +6. With res provision by you of legal services at any time during the period in question, for each gement through which you provided legal services, describe in detail how you p gal services, whether as an individual, as a sole proprietor, through a professional corporatio a professional partnership, a professional limited liability company, a professional association, or similar entity, or through a combination of any of the foregoing, and for each entity through which you provided such legal services describe in detail all agreed (whether or not followed) and de facto business arrangements with respect to your provision of legal services through such entity, including, without limitation, cost sharing, fee splitting, fee percentage, profit sharing and/or profit participation. If any such business arrangement was memorialized pursuant to an agreement, describe the agreement, all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto, the dates of the same, and all parties thereto, and identify and state the names, addresses, email + +addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons in possession or control of embodiments of such agreement, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format). If the actual business arrangement with respect to your provision of legal services through such entity differed from any memorialized business arrangement, describe the difference and the reasons therefor. + +## RESPONSE: + +7. Identify by name, address, and telephone number, each and every dom oreign bank, brokerage and/or other financial institution in which there was an accou t in your name or over which you have had signatory authority or other such control riod in question, and provide the account number, the type of account, starting date on hic you had opened such account or had signatory authority or other such control over it. ch account provide the account balance, if any, at March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, Deeem 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and the account balance, if any, at the present date. If ths4tartin ate of the account was a date between any two of the foregoing dates, provide the opening account balance at the starting date. See definition no. 5 above in preparing the respo c to this interrogatory for all such accounts opened at any time on or after December 7, 2009` + +#### RESPONSE: + +8. Furnish the following financi rmation with respect to you as of March I, 2009, October I, 2009, December 1, 2009, 1ygust 1, 2012 and as of the present date: + +| Assets | ?S e Cost (\$) Fair Market Value (\$) | +|--------|---------------------------------------| +| 2. C | er value of insurance | +| 3. | receivable | +| 4. No | receivable | + +- 12. Limited Liability Company Interests +- 13. Stocks, bonds, options financial contracts or other securities +- 14. Interests in Commodities +- 15. Pensions or annuities +- 16. Precious and semi-precious stones +- 17. Jewelry +- 18. Artwork +- 19. Antiques +- 20. Watches +- 21. Gold +- 22. +- 23. Silver Musical Instruments +- 24. Other collections (coins, stamps, pens, memorabilia, etc.) +- 25. Contracts or Agreements + +"OA + +#### b. Liabilities Face Amount (\$) airl1arket Value (\$) + +- 1. Loans on insurance +- 2. Accounts payable +- 3. Credit balances payable +- 4. Leases payable +- 5. Notes payable +- 6. Mortgages +- 7. Accrued real estate taxes +- 8. Liens payable +- 9. Judgments +- 10. Reserves + +See definition no. 5 above in prej rMg the response to this interrogatory with respect to assets and liabilities reported at 1, 2009, August 1, 2012 and the present date. Provide separate assets and liabilities bles or ch distinct form of ownership described in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. d for ch separate assets and liability table, identify the owner thereof. + +9. Provide the following information relating to your insurance policies in force as at each of March I, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012, and as now in force: + +Policy No. Cash Surrender Value and Description Insurer Policy Amount Accumulated Dividends + +- (3) +- (4) + +Policy Loan No. and Description Date Made + +See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response August 1, 2012 and as now in force, and for each s each distinct form of ownership described in cl each separate table, identify the owner thereo this in[nte riogatory at December 1, 2009 and A itk rejerting date provide separate tables for ), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5, and for + +RESPONSE: + +10. As at each of March at the present date connection there payee of eac outstandin preparing 't presen G4¢ October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and as each account receivable and note receivable held by you, and in set forth the name, address and telephone number of the debtor, identify the count receivable and note receivable, and provide the amount then such account receivable and note receivable. See definition no. 5 above in nse to this interrogatory at December 1, 2009 and August 1, 2012 and as at the + +RESPONSE: + +Automatic Premium Payments Date Made + +co + +11. At any time during the period in question did you own, claim an interest in, or possess, or control, whether directly or indirectly, in your own name, through ownership by entities in which you hold an interest or control, or through trusts in which you are grantors, trustees or beneficiaries, any real property? If your answer to this interrogatory is in the affirmative, state or identify: + +- (a) the dates of acquisition and disposition; +- (b) the property's address; +- (c) the type of property (i.e., house, condominium, commercial building, investment property, etc.); +- (d) the cost of the property at the time purchased; +- (e) fair market value of the property as at each of March I, 2009, October 1, 2 mber 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012, and at the present date; if the property was disposed uired in different name between any two of foregoing dates, also provide the fair nlarltQ e at the time of disposition or acquisition; +- (f) if not still owned, the value of all consideration received, directly r dWctfy, in connection with the disposition of the property, the transferee of the property an lationship to the transferee; +- (g) any mortgages or other encumbrances against the propert d balance, if any, of such mortgages or other encumbrances as at each of March 1, b r 1, 2009, December I, 2009, and August I, 2012, and at the present date; pro s and amounts of all increases in any such mortgages or other encumbrances at an n after December 1, 2009; state the amounts and dates of all mortgage payments e on or after December I, 2009 by any person or entity other than the mortgagor; +- (h) how you titled the property upon its p +- (i) in the event of any changes in the tit which you retained beneficial owners such change, state the amount of a the new titleholder and the rela +- (i) identify the current titlehold +- (j) specifically identify and state 2009 as a result of whic spouse, in trust of any other pe benefit of the dependent c uisition; !der or after December 1, 2009 in connection with p'or effective control of the property, provide the date of sleration paid in connection with the change, identify e new titleholder to you; e relationship of the current titleholder to you. sfers of the property at an time on or after December 1, as helci i the name of spouse, for the benefit of er which spouse is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name mstances under which spouse has the use, enjoyment or exercise effective control over the same or ) in the name of a wards, for the benefit of a dependent child of , in trust under which t child is a beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under wards' de ndent child has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same, or (c) in trust unde hich is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, state the date of the transfer, identify the new title holder, describe the amount and form of all consideration exchanged in connection with the transfer, and identify the payor and the payee of all such consideration exchanged. + +See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to this interrogatory with respect to all property which at any time on or after December 1, 2009 was acquired, or disposed of, or as to which at any time on or after December 1, 2009 title was transferred to a holder described in any of clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. + +RESPONSE: + +12. If at any time during the period in question you did not own the property that was your family, whether full-time or part-time, or if you do not own the property cu by your family, whether full-time or part-time, set forth the name, address telephone number of the person(s) who owned or own the property, the which your family occupied or occupies the property (e.g., lease, sub-I how such arrangement was memorialized, the amount paid for such of such payment, the commencement date and termination date of tha address, email address and telephone number of each of the parti without limitation, the payor of any payment made in conn or not the payor is an actual named party to that arrangem "S ) upied by occupied less and ent pursuant to e arrangement), d the frequency ement, and the name, to tlf9tdTangement, including, that arrangement, whether + +RESPONSE: + +13. As at each of March I, 2 I, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and as at the present date, provide th 11 mg information with respect to each motor vehicle, boat, water craft, or aircraft o ed or used by you as at such date, including, without limitation, in connection with any frac enhip of any of the foregoing: + +| | Amount of | +|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| | S Date Indebtedness Date | +| Descri | o O Cost iNlired if Pledged Pledged Owner | +| (A) Mo | les | +| (specify year) model, SN, | ake, model, VIN, (B) Boats and watercraft (specify make, | + +year) + +#### (C) Aircraft + +(specify make, model, SN, year) + +#### (D) Fractional + +Ownership Interests (specify company, description of fractional interest, make, model, SN, year) + +Specifically identify and state all transfers of the foregoing prope DecemberAl\_2009 as a result of which title was held a in the name benefit of spouse, in a trust under which in the name of any other person in circumstances under w enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective of a dependent child of for the benefit of a which dependent child is a benefici circumstances under which dependen same, or (c) in trust under which person in circumstances under which Edw can exercise effective control over the holder, describe the amount and f transfer, and identify the payor an time on or after ards' spouse, for the stee or beneficiary, or wards' spouse has the use, the same or (b) in the name child of in trust under e name of any other person in h the use, enjoyment or benefit of the beneficiary, or in the name of any other as me use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or the date of the transfer, identify the new title onsideration exchanged in connection with the of all such consideration exchanged. + +See definition no. 5 in preparin 1, 2012 and at the present date. nse to this interrogatory at December I, 2009 and August + +1 °14.9 + +### RESPONSE:r 4S + +14/ ) + +14. Set forth the following information regarding all stocks, bonds, options, other securities and other fmancial instruments (including, but not limited to, any interest in money markets and mutual funds), and commodities directly or indirectly owned by you or held on your behalf at each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, August 1, 2012 and the present date: + +Amount of + +Record Number of Date Indebted. Description Issuer Owner Units Acquired cot If Pledged + +Specifically identify and state all transfers of the foregoing property at any time on or after December 1, 2009 as a result of which record title was held (a) in the name of spouse, for the benefit of IM[ spouse, in a trust under which IMM spouse is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the s the name of a de ndent child of , for the benefit of a dependent child of under which dependent child is a beneficiary, or in the name of circumstances under which de ndent child has the use, enjo nefit of the same, or (c) in trust under which is a trustee or beneficiary, or i the i e of any other person in circumstances under which has the use, enjoyme it of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, state the date of the Iran er, i entify the new record title holder, describe the amount and form of all consideration in connection with the transfer, and identify the payor and the payee of all such con in exchanged. See definition no. 5 in preparing the response to this interrogatory "S ) spouse has e, or (b) in in trust rson in + +### RESPONSE: + +15. Identify separately for each pa for the benefit of you, whether d' c t through the present date: ounts and dates of all sources of income paid to or directly, for each and every year from January 1, 2009 + +- (a) salaries, wages, o commissions: +- (b) honoraria +- (c) lecture +- (d) board e e ip, committee membership, advisory board membership andk agement related compensation (including options and +- (e) di nds: +- (f) inte t: +- (g) income from businesses/professional activities: +- (h) partnership income: +- (i) limited liability membership income +- (j) income from other investments +- (k) capital gains: +- (1) annuities and pensions: + +- (m) rents and royalties: +- (n) income from estates and mists: +- (o) disposition of commodities +- (p) disposition of personal assets. +- (q) contracts or agreements + +See definition no. 5 in preparing the response to this interrogatory, and report such items separately for each distinct form of ownership in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5 and for each separate report, identify the owner. + +#### RESPONSE: + +O + +16. With respect to each of the items set forth in the precedi in atory, state the name, address, email address, and telephone number of the source f ch the income was received (and, where applicable, provide the account numbers of in the financial institutions in which such amounts were received by or for the ben + +### RESPONSE: + +17. For each direct or indirect you, whether for or without c date of any cash, assets or oth provide a description of on the date of transfer, th directly or indirec address, telepho in preparing on or afte definiti veyance, or other disposition by or for the benefit of , at any time from March 1, 2009 through the present s of value with a fair market value of in excess of \$5,000 roperty or asset transferred, the date of transfer, the fair market value nt and nature of the full consideration received (if any), whether to 'm the consideration was paid, and the full name, address, email ber and the relationship to you of the transferee. See definition no. 5 above e to this interrogatory, and include in your response transfers at any time er 7, 2009 by or to any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of + +#### RESPONS + +18. At each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and at the present date, identify each interest directly or indirectly held by you or for your benefit in any Individual Retirement Accounts, Option Plans, pension or profit sharing plans, or any other savings or retirement plans other than those listed in response to previous interrogatories, and include in the response to this interrogatory a description of the type, amount and fair market value of the assets held as at such date. + +#### RESPONSE: + +19. Has a financial statement, credit application, loan application, lease application or other financial affidavit or questionnaire for you been pre the period from March I, 2009 through the present date? If so, state: address and telephone number of the person or entity to whom the the same was prepared; (c) the date the same was prepared address, email address and telephone number of each pe and/or who currently has a copy of the same. See definitio to this interrogatory, and include in your response fin c applications, lease applications, financing appljeati s questionnaires prepared at any time on or after D clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. lion, financing y time during e, address, email given; (b) the reason led; and (d) the name, om the same was delivered e in preparing your response merits, credit applications, loan other financial affidavits or r 7, 2009 for any of the persons listed in + +#### RESPONSE: + +20. Identify ev egal T tion \* (including, without limitation, alternative dispute resolution proceedings) i .0 have been a participant, including, but not limited to, as a party or as legal counse e during the period in question, including, but not limited to, the title of the action, y of the court, the case or index number, the presiding judge, arbitrator or other offici to the action was filed, a brief description of the nature of the action, and the result of the leg non (e.g. judgment for or against of a certain amount). If you participated as counsel in such legal action, state the amount of all remuneration you have received or which you are entitled to receive in connection with such participation, or if your remuneration is contingent on the outcome of such legal action or is subject to any similar arrangement and there has been no final disposition of such legal action, state in detail the terms of all agreements, understandings, and other arrangements relating to any remuneration you may be entitled to receive in connection with your participation in such legal action. + +#### RESPONSE: + +21. As at each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 012 and at the present date, identify every loan and advance extended to and outstanding fro ou, and in such identification include without limitation the name, address, email addres elephone number of the lender or identify the source of the advance, provide the dat= v he I an or the advance, the due dates of any installment payments, the maturity date, th amount, the rate of interest, the collateral or security interest given by you, your pu t , rrowing funds, and the date and amount of each repayment. If any such loan or as memorialized pursuant to one or more agreements, promissory notes, or other ins , describe each of the same, all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereppiske s of the same, and all parties thereto, and identify and state the names, addressei, em it addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons in possession or control of any and all embodiments of such agreements, promissory notes, other instruments, amendments, zoodifications and supplements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, wi lirCation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format). Specifically provide the da bunts of all increases in the outstanding principal of any such loans or advances at anytii e o r after December 1, 2009, and the dates and amounts of all loan and advance repayrients made at any time on or after December 1, 2009 by any person or entity other than the o,Oginal borrower thereunder. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this inte a with respect to each such loan or advance, each such increase in the principal amount th each such repayment made at any time on or after December 1, 2009. + +### RESPONSE: + +22. At each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and at the present date, identify all credit, debit, and/or automatic teller ("ATM") cards used by you, or controlled by you, regardless of whether such cards are titled in your name, at any time during the period in question, and for each such card, identify, state or describe the name and address of the financial institution that issued the card (i.e. VISA, MasterCard, American Express, bank, etc.), the name of the person to whom the card was issued (i.e, the name printed on the card), the card + +number printed on such card, the account number assigned by the financial institution for such card, the account debtor for such card and all outstanding account balances in excess of \$5,000 as of such date. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this interrogatory, and include in your response all credit, debit and ATM cards issued at any time on or after December I, 2009 to any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. For each such account that is open as of any time on or after December 1, 2009, specifically provide the dates and amounts of all increases in account balances in excess of \$5,000 at any time on or after December I, 2009, and the dates and amounts of all account repayments in excess of \$5,000 made at any time on or after December 1, 2009 by any person or entity other than J. his spouse or the account debtor. + +#### RESPONSE: + +O C + +23. State whether at any time during the period 009 through the present date a trust was established by you, whether directly or ind\* grantor or settlor: + +- (a) for any purpose, in whole or in part, relating or having any effect of (i) protecting the wealth, assets, income, profits, investments, or nue of you or your spouse from legal claims or litigation, (ii) limiting the ability to F e actual value of and reducing the amounts of the personal wealth, assets, income, estments or other revenue of you or your spouse, (iii) diverting assets, income, profi inv ents or other revenue away from you or your spouse and to any of the persons listed in cl a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5, or (iv) otherwise diverting future assets, income, p ts, investments and other revenue away from you or your spouse while retaining effective control beneficial ownership or use thereof for yourself or herself or for the benefit of your ily, d state, describe or identify: +- (a) all instru \_ovtfning the formation and administration of the trust, including the original trust agree = the for, and all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto; +- (b) the ' trust +- (c) the n es, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of the settlors or grantors, the trustees, th trust protectors and the beneficiaries of the mist; +- (d) the assets of the trust, the locations of such assets, and the fair market value of the same at the time of creation and at each of December 1, 2009, August 1, 2012 and the present date; +- (e) the location and persons in possession or control all documents that support your answer to this interrogatory. + +### RESPONSE: + +24. Identify all federal, state, local and foreign income tax returns filed by or for you, and any businesses, corporations, partnerships, trusts, limited liability companies or other entities owned or controlled by you for any calendar or fiscal year falling within the period, inc identification without limitation, a description of the return, the identity of the tax the return was filed, the date the return was filed, the government agency was filed, including the location, service center and address of the govern such return was filed, the period for which the return was filed, then addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom a copy of th who currently hold a copy of the return, and for each such return, i reported income in such return and the separate amounts deriv de in such or whom ich e return y with which dresses, email delivered and/or each of source of all such source. + +#### RESPONSE: + +25. State, identify and desc i particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangeme written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or o or electronic format) that you and/or your law firm have had with any and all attorne nvestigators, paraprofessionals, and other contractors or individuals (including wi for services provided to or for the benefit of LM, EW, Jane Doe and/or Virginia Giu (n at any time during the period in question, including, without limitation, engag t lett rs, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agree Jude in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements nde tandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses • one numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or tran the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodime are in the possession or control of such persons. + +#### RESPONSE: + +26. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you and/or your law firm have or at any time during the period in question had with any and all attorneys, investigators, paraprofessionals, and other contractors or individuals (including, without limitation witnesses for services provided to or for the benefit of you, LM, EW, Jane Doe and/or M) in connection with this Action, or any other matters pertaining to or involving Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons; RESPONSE: A Co's + +27. State, identify, and describe with particularity prises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements at any time during od n question, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitatio , texts or other digital or electronic format) between Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney S hart & Shipley PA, or Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and/or any and all attorneys, inv t to , paraprofessionals, and other contractors or individuals (including, without limitatio wan ) for services provided to or for the benefit of you in connection with this Action or any other'matters pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in whit ny such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, `addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such em ave been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and etheij t your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons; + +?Se + +RESPONSE: + +rIN + +28. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm have or at an time during the period in question have had with LM, EW, Jane Doe or which in any way relates to allegations by LM, EW, Jane Doe or against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embod ents have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and r to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such person + +#### RESPONSE: + +29. State, identify, and describe with particularity all understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in limitation, in \_emails Ltexts or other digital or electronic fo (nee n have or at any time during the pin. in agents, public relations firms, book publishers, au publishers, film or television producers, news a, similar business which in any way relates to al (nee ) against Jeffrey Epstein, incl letters, royalty agreements, publishing a management agreements, any other rights, publishing rights, book ri relating to allegations concemi any such promises, contracts, names, addresses, email add embodiments have been whether to your kno ( s ledg , , contracts, agreements, c format (including, without , EW, Jane Doe or Virginia uestion have had with publicity , to agents, syndicators, newspaper evision networks, entities en a ed in y LM, EW, Jane Doe or out limitation engagement letters, retainer literary rights agreements, agency agreements, relating to media rights, film rights, television aph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters stein. Include in your response the format in which nts, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons. + +#### RESPONSE: + +av + +30. For each payment or distribution made by you and/or your law firm, any entity with which you are affiliated, or pursuant to a joint agreement, regarding the proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection with the settlement of claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the payee, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. Include in your response the aggregate amount of such proceeds of settlement + +for each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe retained by you and/or your law firm, the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to the reimbursement of expenses, the amount of such retained proceeds retained by your law firm as its share of any contingency fee, and the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to you as distinguished from your law firm (whether or not paid to you) as your share of the fee payable. + +**RESPONSE:** + +31. State, identify, and describe with particularity any and all trust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements, or similar arrangements, including accounts established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration, and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response a description of the agreements, contracts and instruments, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto pursuant to which such arrangements were established, the dates of the same, the names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of all settlors, grantors, trustees, guardians, custodians, other fiduciaries, and beneficiaries (including, without limitation, contingent beneficiaries) of such arrangements, the names of the account holders, the names of the authorized signatories, the account numbers and the names, addresses, telephone numbers of individual contacts of the financial institutions for all accounts established to receive and hold such proceeds of settlement. + +**RESPONSE:** + +32. Please describe in detail, quantify, and explain the financial loss, including the amount that you contend to have suffered as described in your Fourth Amended Counterclaim; to wit: + +- a. injury to your reputation; +- b. mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety; +- c. fear of physical injury to you and members of your family; +- d. the loss of the value of your time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities; +- e. the cost of defending against Epstein's claims. + +#### RESPONSE: + +33. Please identify with specificity the manner by which you determined that any perceived injury to your reputation, mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety, fear of injury, and any other damage you allege to have suffered by Epstein's filing suit against you in December 2009 was attributable to the lawsuit and not to being partners with Scott Rothstein/a partner at RRA. + +CO SA + +34. Please describe in detail and identify with specificity eve media outlet, website, blog, printed materials, seminar materials, or any other printed media on which you, your law firm, or any association with which you are aff ever advertised, references, or otherwise places the name of Jeffrey Epstein, and i ailed description and the date(s) of each and every such reference, advertiseme , e ent, publication, dissemination, or promotion, identify the persons or groups of hom the same was made, and state the locations where made, and state whether of e materials used in connection with such reference, advertisement, placement, tcan , dissemination, or promotion are in your possession or control, or are still avayl4 e or in print, and identify the persons or website from whom such materials may be + +#### RESPONSE: + +### RESPONSE: + +(Th(S" 117145r + +%obi + +35. Pleasilescribe with particularity any and all evidence, circumstances and events upon which you rely in asserting that your reputation was damaged as alleged in your Counterclaim, including, without limitation, specifically describing how that damage is attributable to Epstein's lawsuit against you. + +#### RESPONSE: + +36. Please explain in detail the amount of time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities including, but not limited to, the time lost, each date on which the time was lost, the case/matter on which you would have otherwise spent the time, your billable hourly rate, if any, you allege to have lost, and for each case/matter identified, please provide income derived by you, your firm, or any entity acting on your behalf in that mat all other evidence, methods and calculations on which you intend to rely to q you claim are attributable to time diverted from your professional respo your Counterclaim. amount of se detail th damages as alleged in + +### RESPONSE: + +37. For eacirant or distribution made by ASts o tein, Rosenfeldt & Alder, =, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman P or iefy other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other er or law firm to Beth Williamson in connection with any claims asserted against Je state, identify, and describe the amount of the payment, the date of payment, the he payment proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, , understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, ions and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +liN(S + +YYY + +'....) C 38. Fo yment or distribution made by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, =, Jaffe, Weissing, wards, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm to L.M., E.W., Jane Doe, any other purported victims, any investigators, paraprofessionals, other attorneys, other contractors or individuals (including, without limitation, witnesses), and any publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, or entities engaged in similar business, which payment in any way relates to claims against Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the source of the payment + +proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +#### RESPONSE: + +39. For each receivable due at an i time during the relevant period to y Adler, , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/ which you have provided legal services from any other lawyer Doe, any other purported victims, any investigators, parapro any publicity agents, public relations firms, book pu reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper pub agencies, television networks, or entities engaged in relates to the instant case or any other case aga Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe source of the payment prorfteds, the rca agreements, understandings and arran modifications and supplements of the 10N ein, Rosenfeldt & y ther law firm through firm, L.M., E.W., Jane s, any other contractors, and thors, journalists, bloggers, m or television producers, news mess, which receivable in any way Epstein or any other claims against t of payment, the date of payment, the for lfie payment, and any promises, contracts, garding said payment, and all amendments, uant to which such payment was made. + +#### RESPONSE: + ++6s + +4:Ai + +State of County of + +Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared J. who produced as Identification, and who first being duly sworn, says that he has read the foregoing, and that all of the matters are true and correct. + +Sworn and Subscribed before me this + +NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE 0 + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800=MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +(Or + +#### NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES + +J. by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded by Jeffrey Epstein on September 5, 2017, and said Answers to Interrogtories have been furnished to the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of CY-41/ex' , 2017. e and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +- C + +AROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 16944 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsxesearcylaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_searolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nurildaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein esA Co + +#### DAMAGES INTERROGATORIES TO J. + +1. State the full name, address, telephone number and description of business for each of your employers (including as an independent contractor, if applicable), at any time during the period in question, and for each employer provide the dates of employment, nature of work, title, pos•tion, salary, and description of your duties for such employer, as well as any changes in title, pos. n or duties during your employment during the period in question, any termination thereof an easons for such change. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or rekrna y calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to i ade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarilybroad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds tie n pximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +"Irc 2. State the full name, address, telephone number, type of entity (including, without limitation, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability corporation, sole proprietorship or other entity) and description of the business conducted of each business enterprise with which you have been affiliated as a principal (including as an owner, officer, director, partner, manager, member, shareholder, or in any similar capacity) at any time during the period itiquestion, as well as the dates of such affiliation, the nature of such affiliation, any changes duri g\_the period in question in the nature of such affiliation, and the reasons for such changes, as well as any I &tie, profits, distributions, salary, commission, or bonus paid in connection with such affiliatio + +RESPONSE: 'on: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the f admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Cou • WIT and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +3. State the full name, address and telephone number of all corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, sole proprietorships other entities or business enterprises for which you have served at any time during the period in question as a member of the Board of Directors, a member of the Board of Trustees, a committee member, an advisory board member, a member of senior management, or in some similar capacity, state the dates ofiervice, describe the capacity in which you served, state the full name, address, email address and telephone, number of each person to whom you reported in such capacity, and if any payment, compensation, fee, honorarium, other remuneration or other consideration was received for such service, state the nature (whether cash or other consideration), frequency, dates, and amounts thereof, and state the dates such service terminated, if applicable, and any reasons therefor. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, ten or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantial e maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +6 C)\* + +4. Identify each person or entity for whom you performed services for a fee amounting to \$5,000 or more, or on a contingency basis or under some other financial arrangement during the period in question, and provide the dates of service, the nature of the services performed, the terms of the business arrangement with respect to the performance of such services, the dates of any payments for such services and the amounts paid or the amounts owed for such services, and identify the person or persons to whom or which such amounts were paid or such amounts are owed. If you performed such services through a law firm, state the name of the law firm through which you performed such services in addition to the other information requested herein. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +5. At any time during the period in question did you have any interest of five (5%) percent or more in a corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, trust or other entity, including, without limitation, professional service entities? If so, state the name and address of each such entity, the dates on which you held your interest, the dates on which you disposed of such interest, if applicable, all amounts and other consideration you paid to acquire such interest, and all amounts and consideration received, directly or indirectly, in connection with holding such interest and in connection with the disposition of such interest, and include the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all other controlling shareholders, partners, members, officers, directors, managers, settlers, trust protectors, trustees, and beneficiaries of such entity. See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to this interrogatory with respect to any such interest acquired at any time on or after December 7, 2009 or any such interest in which there was a change in the ownership thereof at any time on or after December 7, 2009. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +6. With respect to the provision by G you 4¢of legal services at any time during the period in question, for each distinct arrangement through which you provided legal services, describe in detail how you provided legal services, whether as an individual, as a sole proprietor, through a professional corporation, a professional partnership, a professional limited liability company, a professional association, or similar entity, or through a combination of any of the foregoing, and for each entity through which you provided such legal services describe in detail all agreed (whether or not followed) and de faro business arrangements with respect to your proVision of legal services through such entity, including, without limitation, cost sharing, fee splitting, fee percentage, profit sharing and/or profit participation. If any such business arrangement was memorialized pursuant to an agreement, describe the agreement, all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto, the dates of the same, and all parties thereto, and identify and state the names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons in possession or control of embodiments of such agreement, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format). If the actual business arrangement with respect to your provision of legal services through such entity differed from any memorialized business arrangement, describe the difference and the masons therefor. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges + +A + +7. Identify by name, address, and telephone number, each and every domestic and foreign ank, brokerage and/or other financial institution in which there was an account maintained in your name or over which you have had signatory authority or other such control during the period in question, and provide the account number, the type of account, starting date on which you had opened such accountor had signatory authority or other such control over it. For each such account provide the account balance, if any, at March I, 2009, October I, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1,2012 and the account balance, if any, at the present date. If the starting date of the account was a date between any two of the foregoing dates, provide the opening account balance at the starting date. See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to this interrogatory for all such accounts opened at any time on or after December , 2009. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is notiAl tinv' material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The intern story seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the\extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +8. Furnish the fqowing financial information with respect to you as of March I, 2009, October I, 2009, Decemb 2009, and August 1, 2012 and as of the present date: + +| Assets | Cost (\$) | Fair Market Value (\$) | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|------------------------| +| 1. Cash | | | +| 2. Cash surrender value of insurance | | | +| 3. Accounts receivable | | | +| 4. Notes receivable | | | +| 5. Real estate, including fractional interests | | | +| 6. Motor Vehicles | | | +| 7. Boats and other watercraft, including fractional interests | | | +| 8. Aircraft, including fractional interests | | | +| 9. Club Memberships | | | +| 10. Interests in Trusts | | | +| 11. Partnership Interests | | | +| 12. Limited Liability Company Interests | | | +| 13. Stocks, bonds, options financial contracts or other securities | | | + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +- 14. Interests in Commodities +- 15. Pensions or annuities +- 16. Precious and semi-precious stones +- 17. Jewelry +- 18. Artwork +- 19. Antiques +- 20. Watches +- 21. Gold +- 22. Silver +- 23. Musical Instruments +- 24. Other collections (coins, stamps, pens, memorabilia, etc.) +- 25. Contracts or Agreements + +#### b. Liabilities Face Amount (\$) Fair rket &lue (\$) + +- 1. Loans on insurance +- 2. Accounts payable +- 3. Credit balances payable +- 4. Leases payable +- 5. Notes payable +- 6. Mortgages +- 7. Accrued real estate taxes +- 8. Liens payable +- 9. Judgments +- 10. Reserves + +See definition no. 5 above in preparingt≤ **iesp se to this interrogatory with respect to assets and liabilities reported at December I, 2009, A it I, 2012 and the present date. Provide separate assets and liabilities tables for each distinct form of o rship described in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5, and for each separate assets and liability to , dentify the owner thereof.** + +**RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-D4ndant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogat apropounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maxim r permitted without leave of Court.** + +**9. Provide the following information relating to your insurance policies in force as at each of March I, 2009, October I, 2009, December I, 2009, and August I. 2012, and as now in force:** + +**Policy No. Cash Surrender Value and Description Insurer Policy Amount Accumulated Dividends** + +Policy Loan No. + +and Description + +Automatic Premium Payments + +Date Made Date Made + +See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to41) is interrogatory at December I. 2009 and August 1, 2012 and as now in force, and for each su rung date provide separate tables for each distinct form of ownership described in clauses (a) (c) of definition no. 5. and for each separate table, identify the owner thereof + +RESPONSE: Objection: The info lead to the discovery of admissibl the Counter-Plaintiff and all othe of Counter-Defendant's Interrogato of interrogatories propound maximum number ?psitted , is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to . The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of passed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number e Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the Mout leave of Court. + +10. As at ea 0rch 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and as at the presen ntify each account receivable and note receivable held by you, and in connection therewith orth the name, address and telephone number of the debtor, identify the payee of each such account receivable and note receivable, and provide the amount then outstanding of each such account receivable and note receivable. See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to this interrogatory at December I, 2009 and August I, 2012 and as at the present date. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +I I. At any time during the period in question did you own, claim an interest in, or possess, or control, whether directly or indirectly, in your own name, through ownership by entities in which you hold an interest or control, or through trusts in which you are grantors, trustees or beneficiaries, any real property? If your answer to this interrogatory is in the affirmative, state or identify: + +- (a) the dates of acquisition and disposition; +- (b) the property's address; +- (c) the type of property (i.e., house, condominium, commercial building, investment property, etc.); +- (d) the cost of the property at the time purchased; +- (e) fair market value of the property as at each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012, and at the present date; if the property was disposed of or acquired in different name between any two of foregoing dates, also provide the fair market value at the time of disposition or acquisition; +- (f) if not still owned, the value of all consideration received, directly or indirectly, in connection with the disposition of the property, the transferee of the property and your relationship to the transferee; +- (g) any mortgages or other encumbrances against the property and the balance, if any, of such mortgages or other encumbrances as at each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012, and at the present date; provide the dates and amounts of all increases in any such mortgages or other encumbrances at any time on or after December 1, 2009; state the amounts and dates of all mortgage payments made at any time on or after December 1, 2009 by any person or entity other than the mortgagor; +- (h) how you titled the property upon its purchase or acquisition; +- (i) in the event of any changes in the titleholder on or after December 1, 2009 in connection with which you retained beneficial ownership or effective control of the property, provide the date of such change, state the amount of any consideration paid in connection with the change, identify the new titleholder and the relationship of the new titleholder to you; +- (i) identify the current titleholder and the relationship of the current titleholder to you. +- (j) specifically identify and state all transfers of the property at any time on or after December 1, 2009 as a result of which title was held (a) in the name of [REDACTED] spouse, for the benefit of [REDACTED] spouse, in a trust under which Edwards' spouse is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which Edwards' spouse has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, or (b) in the name of a dependent child of [REDACTED], for the benefit of a dependent child of Edwards, in trust under which [REDACTED] dependent child is a beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which [REDACTED] dependent child has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same, or (c) in trust under which [REDACTED] is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which [REDACTED] has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, state the date of the transfer, identify the new title holder, describe the amount and form of all consideration exchanged in connection with the transfer, and identify the payor and the payee of all such consideration exchanged. + +See definition no. 5 above in preparing the response to this interrogatory with respect to all property which at any time on or after December 1, 2009 was acquired, or disposed of, or as to which at any time on or after December 1, 2009 title was transferred to a holder described in any of clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +- 12. If at any time during the period in question you did not own the property that was occupied by your family, whether full-time or part-time, or if you do not own the property currently occupied by your family, whether full-time or part-time, set forth the name, address, email address and telephone number ofthaPerson(s) who owned or own the property, the arrangement pursuant to which your family occupied or occupies the property (e.g., lease, sub-lease, other arrangement), how such arrangement was memorialized, the amount paid for such occupancy and the frequency of such payment, the commencement date and termination date of that arrangement, and the name, address, email address and telephone number of each of the parties to that arrangement, including, without limitation, the payor of any payment made in connection with that arrangement, whether or not the payor is an actual named party to that arrangement. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grow thatt number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts su all exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +- 13. As at each of March I, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and as at the present date, provide the following information with respect to each motor vehicle, boat, water craft, or aircraft owned or used by you as at such date, including, without limitation, in connection with any fractional ownership of any of the foregoing: + +| Descriptions | Cost | Date Acquired | Amount of Indebtedness Date if Pledged | Pledged | Owner | +|--------------|------|---------------|----------------------------------------|---------|-------| +| | | | | | | + +- (A) Motor Vehicles (specify make, model, VIN, year) +- (B) Boats and watercraft (specify make, model, SN, + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories year) + +#### (C) Aircraft + +(specify make, model, SN, Yew) + +#### (D) Fractional + +Ownership Interests (specify company, description of fractional interest, make, model, SN, year) + +..-֥ C mt)sr Specifically identify and state all transfers of the foregoing. ur my at any time after December 1, 2009 as a result of which title was held (a) in the name of 'Mr spouse, for the benefit of spouse, in a trust under which s use is a trustee or bepeficiary,-OF in the name of any other person in circumstances under which spouse has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, or (b) in the name of a dependent child of , for the benefit of a dependent child a in trust under which Edwards' de endent child is a beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which dependent child has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same, or (c) in trust under which is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, state the date of the transfer, identify the new title holder, describe the amount and form of all consideration exchanged in connection with the transfer, and identify the payor and the payee of all s h consideration exchanged. + +..\*Jr See definition no. 5 in preparing to this interrogatory at December I, 2009 and August I, 2012 and at the present date. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiffand all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +14. Set forth the following information regarding all stocks, bonds, options, other securities and other financial instruments (including, but not limited to, any interest in money markets and mutual funds), and commodities directly or indirectly owned by you or held on your behalf at each of March 1, 2009, October 2009, December 1, 2009, August I, 2012 and the present date: + +| Record Number of Date | Indebted. | | +|---------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| Description Issuer Owner Units | Acquired | Cost If Pledged | + +Specifically identify and state all transfers of the foregoing property at any time on or after December 1, 2009 as a result of which record title was held (a) in the name of [REDACTED] spouse, for the benefit of [REDACTED] spouse, in a trust under which [REDACTED] spouse is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which [REDACTED] spouse has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, or (b) in the name of a dependent child of Edwards, for the benefit of a dependent child of [REDACTED], in trust under which [REDACTED] dependent child is a beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which [REDACTED] dependent child has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same, or (c) in trust under which [REDACTED] is a trustee or beneficiary, or in the name of any other person in circumstances under which [REDACTED] has the use, enjoyment or benefit of the same or can exercise effective control over the same, state the date of the transfer, identify the new record title holder, describe the amount and form of all consideration exchanged in connection with the transfer, and identify the payor and the payee of all such consideration exchanged. See definition no. 5 in preparing the response to this interrogatory + +**RESPONSE:** Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +15. Identify separately for each payor the amounts and dates of all sources of income paid to or for the benefit of you, whether directly or indirectly, for each and every year from January 1, 2009 through the present date: + +- (a) salaries, wages, or commissions: +- (b) honoraria +- (c) lecture fees +- (d) board membership, committee membership, advisory board membership and other management related compensation (including [REDACTED] options and [REDACTED] awards) +- (e) dividends: +- (f) interest: +- (g) income from businesses/professional activities: +- (h) partnership income: +- (i) limited liability membership income +- (j) income from other investments +- (k) capital gains: +- (l) annuities and pensions: + +- (m) rents and royalties: +- (n) income from estates and trusts: +- (o) disposition of commodities +- (p) disposition of personal assets. +- (q) contracts or agreements + +See definition no. 5 in preparing the response to this interrogatory, and report such items separately for each distinct form of ownership in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5 and for each separate report, identify the owner. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonabl lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broa of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on th of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including sub maximum number permitted without leave of Court. y ated to mic rivacy of f Definition #5 that the number exceeds the + +16. With respect to each of the items set forth in th email address, and telephone number of the sou applicable, provide the account numbers of amounts were received by or for the benefi "S 94A) interrogatory, state the name, address, hich the income was received (and, where in the financial institutions in which such + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information so t is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible idence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all othe enco d within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interroga Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propound the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permi ut leave of Court. + +O + +17. For e ct or indirect transfer, conveyance, or other disposition by or for the benefit of you, whether for without consideration, at any time from March 1, 2009 through the present date of any cash, assets or other items of value with a fair market value of in excess of \$5,000 provide a description of the property or asset transferred, the date of transfer, the fair market value on the date of transfer, the amount and nature of the full consideration received (if any), whether directly or indirectly, to whom the consideration was paid, and the full name, address, email address, telephone number and the relationship to you of the transferee. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this interrogatory, and include in your response transfers at any time on or after December 7, 2009 by or to any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 + +of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +18. At each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and at the present date, identify each interest directly or indirectly held by you or for your benefit in any Individual Retirement Accounts, Option Plans, pension or profit sharing plans, or any other savings or retirement plans other than those listed in response to previous interrogatories, and include in the response to this interrogatory a description of the type, amount and fair market value of the assets held as at such date. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant includin 'ubp substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +"S ) + +19. Has a financial statement, credit appRea ,roan application, lease application, financing application or other financial affidavit or questionnaire for you been prepared at any time during the period from March I, 2009 through the present date? If so, state: (a) the name, address, email address and telephone number of the person or entity to whom the same was given; (b) the reason the same was prepared; (c) the date the same was prepared and submitted; and (d) the name, address, email address and telephone number of each person to whom the same was delivered and/or who currently has a copy of the same. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this interrogatory, and include in your response financial statements, credit applications, loan applications, lease applications, financing applications or other financial affidavits or questionnaires prepared at any time on or Mier December 7, 2009 for any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (e) of definition no. 5. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +**20.** Identify every legal action (including, without limitation, alternative dispute resolution proceedings) in which you have been a participant, including, but not limited to, as a party or as legal counsel at any time during the period in question, including, but not limited to, the title of the action, the name of the court, the case or index number, the presiding judge, arbitrator or other officiant, the date the action was filed, a brief description of the nature of the action, and the result of the legal action (e.g. judgment for or against of a certain amount). If you participated as counsel in such legal action, state the amount of all remuneration you have received or which you are entitled to receive in connection with such participation, or if your remuneration is contingent on the outcome of such legal action or is subject to any similar arrangement and there has been no final disposition of such legal action, state in detail the terms of all agreements, understandings, and other arrangements relating to any remuneration you may be entitled to receive in connection with your participation in such legal action. + +**RESPONSE:** Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. + +**21.** As at each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and at the present date, identify every loan and advance extended to and outstanding from you, and in such identification include without limitation the name, address, email address and telephone number of the lender or identify the source of the advance, provide the date of the loan or the advance, the due dates of any installment payments, the maturity date, the principal amount, the rate of interest, the collateral or + +security interest given by you, your purpose in borrowing funds, and the date and amount of each repayment. If any such loan or advance was memorialized pursuant to one or more agreements, promissory notes, or other instruments, describe each of the same, all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto, the dates of the same, and all parties thereto, and identify and state the names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons in possession or control of any and all embodiments of such agreements, promissory notes, other instruments, amendments, modifications and supplements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format). Specifically provide the dates and amounts of all increases in the outstanding principal of any such loans or advances at any time on or after December 1, 2009, and the dates and amounts of all loan and advance repayments made at any time on or after December 1, 2009 by any person or entity other than the original borrower thereunder. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this interrogatory with respect to each such loan or advance, each such increase in the principal amount thereof, and each such repayment made at any time on or after December 1, 2009. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or [REDACTED] sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +22. At each of March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, December 1, 2009, and August 1, 2012 and at the present date, identify all credit, debit, and/or automatic teller ("ATM") cards used by you, or controlled by you, regardless of whether such cards are titled in your name, at any time during the period in question, and for each such card, identify, state or describe the name and address of the financial institution that issued the card (i.e. VISA, MasterCard, American Express, bank, etc.), the name of the person to whom the card was issued (i.e. the name printed on the card), the card number printed on such card, the account number assigned by the financial institution for such card, the account debtor for such card and all outstanding account balances in excess of \$5,000 as of such date. See definition no. 5 above in preparing your response to this interrogatory, and include in your response all credit, debit and ATM cards issued at any time on or after December 1, 2009 to any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5. For each such account that is open as of any time on or after December 1, 2009, specifically provide the dates and amounts of all increases in account balances in excess of \$5,000 at any time on or after December 1, 2009, and the dates and amounts of all account repayments in excess of \$5,000 made at any time on or after December 1, 2009 by any person or entity other than [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], his spouse or the account debtor. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories + +of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +23. State whether at any time during the period December 1, 2009 through the present date a trust was established by you, whether directly or indirectly, as grantor or settlor: + +(a) for any purpose, in whole or in part, relating to or having any effect of (i) protecting the wealth, assets, income, profits, investments, or other revenue of you or your spouse from legal claims or litigation, (ii) limiting the ability to quantify the actual value of and reducing the amounts of the personal wealth, assets, income, profits, investments or other revenue of you or your spouse, (iii) diverting assets, income, profits, investments or other revenue away from you or your spouse and to any of the persons listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of definition no. 5, or (iv) otherwise diverting future assets, income, profits, investments and other revenue away from you or your spouse while retaining effective control and or beneficial ownership or use thereof for yourself or herself or for the benefit of your family, and state, describe or identify: + +(a) all instruments governing the formation and administration of the trust, including the original trust agreement therefor, and all amendments, modifications, and supplements thereto; + +(b) the situs of the trust + +(c) the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of the settlors or grantors, the trustees, the trust protectors and the beneficiaries of the trust; + +(d) the assets of the trust, the locations of such assets, and the fair market value of the same at the time of creation and at each of December 1, 2009, August 1, 2012 and the present date; + +(e) the location and persons in possession or control all documents that support your answer to this interrogatory. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +24. Identify all federal, state, local and foreign income tax returns filed by or for you, and any businesses, corporations, partnerships, trusts, limited liability companies or other entities owned or controlled by you for any calendar or fiscal year falling within the period, include in such identification without limitation, a description of the return, the identity of the taxpayer for whom the return was filed, the date the return was filed, the government agency with which the return was filed, including the location, service center and address of the government agency with which such return was filed, the period for which the return was filed, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom a copy of the return was delivered and/or who currently hold a copy of the return, and for each such return, identify each of source of all reported income in such return and the separate amounts derived from each such source. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +25. State, identify and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you and/or your law firm have had with any and all attorneys, investigators, paraprofessionals, and other contractors or individuals (including witnesses) for services provided to or for the benefit of LM, EW, Jane Doe and/or [REDACTED] at any time during the period in question, including, without limitation, engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +26. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you and/or your law firm have or at any time during the period in question had with any and all attorneys, investigators, paraprofessionals, and other + +contractors or individuals (including, without limitation, witnesses) for services provided to or for the benefit of you, LM, EW, Jane Doe and/or [REDACTED] in connection with this Action, or any other matters pertaining to or involving Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons; + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +27. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements at any time during the period in question, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) between Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA, or Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and/or any and all attorneys, investigators, paraprofessionals, and other contractors or individuals (including, without limitation, witnesses) for services provided to or for the benefit of you in connection with this Action or any other [REDACTED] letters pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons; + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +28. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you, =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehnnan PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other law er and/or law firm have or at any time during the period in question have had with LM, EW, Jane Doe or which in any way relates to allegations by LM, EW, Jane Doe or against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knot such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material o'flt sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +29. State, identify, and describe with particularity all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (includin ,. without limitation in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that LM, EW, Jane Doe or have or at any time during the period in question have had with publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks entities engaged in similar business which in any way relates to allegations by LM, LW, Jane Doc or against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, agenw agreements, management agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matferetlating to allegations conceming Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which arfrettch promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements are embodied, the names, addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers of all persons to whom such embodiments have been delivered or transmitted, the dates of such delivery or transmission, and whether to your knowledge such embodiments are in the possession or control of such persons. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +30. For each payment or distribution made by you and/or your law firm, any entity with which you are affiliated, or pursuant to a joint agreement, regarding the proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection with the settlement of claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the payee, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. Include in your response the aggregate amount of such proceeds of settlement for each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe retained by you and/or your law Jinn, the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to the reimbursement of expenses, the amount of such retained proceeds retained by your law firm as its share of any contingency fee, and the amount of such retained proceeds allocated to you as distinguished from your law firm (whether or not paid to you) as your share of the fee payable. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. + +Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, Counter-Plaintiff acknowledges that the following sums were paid by Jeffrey Epstein to voluntarily settle the claims of sexual molestation asserted against Jeffrey Epstein by each of the following: + +L.M. \$ I n3illion + +E.W. S-2 million + +Jane Doe 5-23 million + +31. State, identify, and describe with particularity any and all trust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements, or similar arrangements, including accounts established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration, and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response a description of the agreements, contracts and instruments, and all amendments, + +modifications and supplements thereto pursuant to which such arrangements were established, the dates of the same, the names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of all settlors, grantors, trustees, guardians, custodians, other fiduciaries, and beneficiaries (including, without limitation, contingent beneficiaries) of such arrangements, the names of the account holders, the names of the authorized signatories, the account numbers and the names, addresses, telephone numbers of individual contacts of the financial institutions for all accounts established to receive and hold such proceeds of settlement. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number: rted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work t privileges. + +/ 4.1% Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, Counter-Plaintiff acknowledge's that the following sums were paid by Jeffrey Epstein to voluntarily settle the claims of sexu In lestation asserted against Jeffrey Epstein by each of the following: + +L.M. \$ 1 million + +E.W. \$ 2 million + +Jane Doe \$ 2.5 million + +32. Pleisc\dasoribe in detail, quantify, and explain the financial loss, including the amount that you contend torttive suffered as described in your Fourth Amended Counterclaim; to wit: + +- a. injury to your reputation; +- b. mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety; +- c. fear of physical injury to you and members of your family; +- d. the loss of the value of your time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities; +- c. the cost of defending against Epstein's claims. + +RESPONSE: Each of the listed elements of damage is presently unliquidated and will be established by the verdict of the jury empaneled to hear this case and entrusted with the responsibility to render a verdict that fully and fairly compensates for every element of damage sustained by him in the past and continues to be sustained by him in the future. As the jury will be instructed, there is no exact measure for such damages, but their verdict is required to take all evidence presented to them under consideration and to be fair, just and reasonable under the circumstances as they find them to exist. + +33. Please identify with specificity the manner by which you determined that any perceird injury to your reputation, mental anguish, embarrassment and anxiety, fear of injury, and any other damage you allege to have suffered by Epstein's filing suit against you in December 2009 was attribute the lawsuit and not to being partners with Scott Rothstein/a partner at RRA. + +C.) + +RESPONSE: was never partners with Scott R\_ Lei partner at RRA and consequently could not have sustained any injury attributable c 1 c)cimmpistance that never existed. + +\HC c\ + +34. Please describe in detail and identify wits ?Citie ity every social media outlet, website, blog, printed materials, seminar materials, or any other printed or published media on which you, your law firm, or any association with which you are affiliated has ever advertised, references, or otherwise places the name of Jeffrey Epstein, and include a detailed description and the date(s) of each and every such reference, advertisement, placement, publication, dissemination, or promotion, identify the persons or groups of persons to whom the same was made, and state the locations where made, and state whether or not the materials used in connection with such reference, advertisement, placement, publication, dissemination, or promotion am in your possession or control, or are still available on line or in print, and identify the persons or website from whom such materials may be obtained. + +RESPONSE: bje Son: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the diK of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the CountetsPlaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-\ Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. + +35. Please describe with particularity any and all evidence, circumstances and events upon which you rely in asserting that your reputation was damaged as alleged in your Counterclaim, including, without limitation, specifically describing how that damage is attributable to Epstein's lawsuit against you. + +RESPONSE: The allegations of Epstein's maliciously filed Complaint are defamatory per se. + +' + +36. Please explain in detail the amount of time required be diverted from your professional responsibilities including, but not limited to, the time lost, each date on which the time was lost, the case/matter on which you would have otherwise spent the time, your billable hourly rate, if any, you allege to have lost, and for each case/matter identified, please provide the amount of income derived by you, your firm, or any entity acting on your behalf in that matter. Please detail all other evidence, methods and calculations on which you int o rely to quantify the damages you claim arc attributable to time diverted from your professiona 'bilities as alleged in your Counterclaim. + +RESPONSE: Time diverted fro radley professional responsibilities is reflected in previously produced time records a "will be updated prior to the expiration of discovery. Counter-Plaintiff, however, objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant, including subparts, substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without Ire of court. + +0 + +37. For each payment or distribution made by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Alder, =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm to Beth Williamson in connection with any claims asserted against Jeffrey Epstein state, identify, and describe the amount of the payment, the date of payment, the source of the payment proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. + +Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. + +**38.** For each payment or distribution made by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, Farner, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm to L.M., E.W., Jane Doe, any other purported victims, any investigators, paraprofessionals, other attorneys, other contractors or individuals (including, without limitation, witnesses), and any publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, or entities engaged in similar business, which payment in any way relates to claims against Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the source of the payment proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +**RESPONSE:** Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of Court. + +In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. + +**39.** For each receivable due at any time during the relevant period to you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services from any other lawyer and/or law firm, L.M., E.W., Jane Doe, any other purported victims, any investigators, paraprofessionals, any other contractors, and any publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, or entities engaged in similar business, which receivable in any way relates to + +the instant case or any other case against Jeffrey Epstein or any other claims against Jeffrey Epstein, state, identify, and describe the amount of payment, the date of payment, the source of the payment proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. Counter-Plaintiff further objects on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant including subparts substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without ve of Court. In addition, this Interrogatory seeks to invade the attorney-client and work product privileges. Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, Counter-Plaintiff acknowledges that the following sums were paid by Jeffrey Epstein to voluntarily settle the claims of sexual molestation asserted against Jeffrey Epstein by each of the following: + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +![]()Signature of Answering Party + +STATE OF ) + +COUNTY OF ) + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th day of +September, 2017 by Brad Edwards who is personally known to me or +who has produced \_\_\_\_\_ (type of identification) as identification +and who did/did not take an oath. + +![](_page_108_Picture_14.jpeg) + +![]() + +# EXHIBIT E + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J, Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FwItENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY 'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT/CO TER- AINTIFF + +Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersi 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedu produce the documents responsive to th the date of service of this Requ Interrogatories Relating to D responding hereto. cc sel and pursuant to Rule requests that requests within thirty (30) days from 'structions and definitions provided in the ed contemporaneously herewith, shall be used in + +#### ITEMS TO BE PRODUCED + +- 1. A copy all documents that relate to, or reference or include, any and all informat\* in, or that you referred to in any way in providing your responses to, PI • nter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories to Defendant/Counter-PI y Relating to Damages, served contemporaneously herewith. +- 2. copy of all documents that reflect, any and all promises, instruments, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any business arrangements between you and any and all law firms through which you rendered legal services at any time during the period in question, including, without limitation, cost sharing, fee splitting, fee percentage, profit sharing and/or profit participation terms and conditions including, but not limited to, your provision of legal services during your affiliation with Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler. + +3. A copy of all documents reflecting, any and all instruments, agreements, contracts, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all trust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements or similar arrangements established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. + +4. A copy of all documents reflecting, any and all promises, contracts, dj ents, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in el c rmat (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or elec at), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memon y and all arrangements that you and/or your law firm and/or any other law aw rum have or at any time during the period in question had with LM, EW, o ane roe, which in any way relate to allegations by LM, EW, or Jane Doe agai Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, f arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreem ing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to ghts, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photogra tory rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Je + +5. A copy of all documents reflec y d all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements heth written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in is or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modificatio plements thereto, memorializing, any and all a ements that you, any through which you have provided legal services, , Jaffe, Weissing, and , istos & Lehrman PL and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm have or at any time ng the period in question had with any and all attorneys, investigators, other p nals, contractors and consultants and witnesses with respect . to this case or o r ase involving the claims of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffre including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee shari ments, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreeme dishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relatin ia rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, ph rights, story rights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations conce g Jeffrey Epstein. + +6. A copy of all documents reflecting, and all promises, contracts, agreements, understandings, and arrangements, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format), and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto, memorializing, any and all arrangements that Paul Cassell, Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA, or Boies Schiller Flexner LLP have or at any time during the period in question had with any and all attorneys (including, without limitation, you, any law firm through + +which you then rendered legal services, and Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman PL), investigators, other professionals, contractors and consultants and witnesses with respect to this case and any other case involving the claims of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including without limitation engagement letters, retainer letters, fee sharing arrangements, common interest or joint defense agreements, royalty agreements, publishing agreements, literary rights agreements, any other agreements relating to media rights, film rights, television rights, publishing rights, book rights, photograph rights, story tights, agency, or similar matters relating to allegations concerning Jeffrey Epstein. + +7. A copy of all documents, including, without limitation, checks, nsfer instructions, wire transfer confirmations, bank statements, email confi iy. s, tices of Distribution and other documents, reflecting any and all payme stributions made by you, an law fi nn , through which you provided legal sery or Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL regarding the of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in connection with the claims of LM, E Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, including, without limitation, payments o tri ons made to or for the benefit of LM, EW or Jane Doe (including, without , to any trusts or similar arrangements or accounts of which any of LM, EW, a were then beneficiaries), payments made to Paul Cassell, payments made o y er law firm or individual lawyer, payments made to investigators, cons visors, or other professionals, payments made to other contractors and pa ad to witnesses. + +8. A copy of all documents, incl hout limitation, checks, wire transfer instructions, wire transfer confirms statements, email confirmations, Notices of Distribution and other docum ting in respect of the proceeds of settlement paid by Jeffrey Epstein in con the claims of LM, EW, and Jane Doe against him any and all amounts re allocated to you, any law firm through which you then provided legal servi , Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman PL as reimbursement of cos expenses or in payment for legal services rendered. + +9. A copy of all ilocdments reflecting payments by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, Fume ffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through w yo eve provided le al services and/or an other lawyer and/or law firm to LM. E. ., Jane Doe, , any investigators, pant s, other attorneys, other contractors or persons (including, without li itnesses, publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, jouma , bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, other media outlets or entities engaged in similar business), which payments in any way relate to any federal or Florida state cases against Jeffrey Epstein or any other claims against Jeffrey Epstein in which you or your clients were involved. + +10. A of all documents refleSp ayments made to you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law \_ mrif\_ r or made to or for the benefit of L.M. E.W., Jane Doe, by any investigators, paraprofessionals, other attorneys, other contractors or other persons (including, without limitation, publicity agents, public relations firms, book publishers, authors, journalists, bloggers, reporters, literary agents, syndicators, newspaper publishers, film or television producers, news agencies, television networks, other media outlets or entities engaged in similar business), which payments in any way relate to any federal or Florida state cases against Jeffrey Epstein or any other claims or allegations against Jeffrey Epstein in which you or your clients were involved. + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +LAW OFFICES OF TONJA H + +315 SE 7th Street + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Flori + +954.467.1223 + +954.337.37 10 + +Tonja@t. .com + +Efilin IS to , dad.com + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCGIT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant®. + +### )2ESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERID 419PENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUES TS • DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAIN - + +I. MI by and through hi tr ysi ed attorneys and pursuant to Rule 1.350, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, here1? Z?esponiIs to Jeffrey Epstein's, Request for Production dated September 5, 2017 as folios + +- 1. Objection. Attom roduct. +- 2. Objection. The reference to "the period in question" is undefined, vague and ambi o s; the' request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, rmikiterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client Ne privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. +- 3. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. + +- 4. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attogey-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to finar"\ ncid@i \\vac +- 5. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information mat 'is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to very of admissible evidence; information requested includes attonrrk product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protetct by lights to financial privacy. +- 6. Objection. The request is overly broac( and eelcs information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably S\ otilcul, "0 to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requd d includYes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged informatio 9 ation protected by rights to financial privacy. +- 7. Objection. The est) Is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, 'and 'not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible o/ + - . evideAr inf rmation requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client kKiiiired information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attorney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to financial privacy. + +adv. Epstein 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Epstein's Request for Production served 9.5.17 17 ' 6 k) ( S 3 + +9. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks information that is irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; information requested includes attorney work product; attoney-client privileged information, and information protected by rights to finan + +10. Objection. The request is overly broad and seeks informat'lbp ilJt s irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to th discbvery of admissible evidence; information requested includes alto k product; attorney-client privileged information, and information prot s to financial privacy. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that .a true anderre ,copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve l to all Counsel on the attached list, this Ofobu c day of , 2017. + +-I + +JA OLA No.: 169440 eann@searcylaw.com E-Mail(s): isx@searcvlaw.com; and rimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Attorneys for Fax: 561-3 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response to Epstein's Request for Production served 9.5.17 + +COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### NOTICE OF SERVICING EX PE RI IN l'ERROG i fiSt , TO J. + +Go + +Jeffrey Epstein, hereby gives notice p kp t to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered tugh 16 have been directed to J. this day of + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached Elec /Z mService it' list, this day of , 2017. + +ricS' + +'....) + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasst@gmail.com + +By: Is/ W. Chester W. CHESTER Florida Bar No. 261858 Jr. JR. + +#### Electronic Service List: + +### Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mep@searcylaw.com + +#### Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +J. ,Ess , Jaffe, Weissing, , et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +#### Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc®nuriklaw.com + +#### Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P. 250 S. Australian Avenue, S7li 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 3401 E-Mails: jgoldberge gwpa om smahon a.com + +### Fred Hadda + +Haddad , PLLC 1 Financial , Suite 2612 Fort Lauderda e, FL 33394 E-Mails: dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +### Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +#### EXPERT INTERROGATORIES TO + +- 1. State the name, address and profession of each person whom you expect to call as an expert witness at trial or on whose expert opinions others have relied in forming opinions which you will or may offer at trial. Cos +- 2. With regard to each listed above, state his/her which qualify him/her to testify as an expert i thereof, please provide a copy of each expert' , education and experience ea of expertise; and/or in lieu ent curriculum vitae. +- 3. Give e o3r title of each paper which each expert has authored in the field of his/her ex + +- 4. State the name, volume and page number of the publication in which each article or paper listed above can be found. +- 5. State the substance and identify the source of the facts hicTh ch expert has relied in forming any opinion about which the expert is expec tify. +- 6. Give a comp ted I all documents, depositions, exhibits, plans, drawings, ordinances or status ich ea expert has reviewed in forming his/her opinion. + +- 7. State the opinions to which the experts aforementioned are expected to testify. C A +- 8. Give a summary of the grounds of each opinion stated, iS C) +- 9. Identify where the listed above has practiced or worked in his/her tiled during the put 10 ye + +10. As to each position identified above, please state: + +a. Whether the expert was self-employed, employed by someone else or associated as a partner. + +b. Each address where the expert practiced or was employed. + +c. The dates the expert was with each employer: + +d. The type of duty the expert performed with each employer. + +- II. If the expert has not practiced or worked in his/her field during the last 10 years, what was his/her employment during this time? +- 12. Did the expert prepare anything or have anything prepared settin er opinions or conclusions reached from his/her examination or any test he/sh + - a. If so, state the date of preparation. + - b. The name or other mea f iddbtification of each individual and entity to the material prepared was stributed. Ca) ( S" + - c. name and address of each person who has present custody of each non- + - cal copy of the material. + +- 13. Did the expert prepare or have prepared any material based upon tests, examinations or analysis of documents that he/her conducted in which he/her did not render an opinion? a, If so, state description of all material that was prepared by or for the expert. + - b. The date that the material was prepared. 6.3 SA + - c. The name or other means of idene 4/ "e person to whom all material was distributed. + - d. The name dress of the person who has present custody of each nonident' kal co the material. +0 + +- 14. If you will do so without a Request to Produce, attach a copy of all materials prepared by or for each expert on the basis of his/her tests, examinations or analyses to your answers to these interrogatories. ,0 0 N +- 15. Is the expert to be compensated for his/her work and effo s ' ection with this action? + - a. If so, describe in detail the basis and/or ra co pensation, the total amount paid to or on behalf of the expert, the am n tly payable to the expert for all services rendered as of the date of yt) \ w to these interrogatories. + - b. Estimate the totalIm6unt of time reasonably expected to be spent by the expert in completin rvices to be rendered in this matter from the date of your answers to kcon th cl of the case. +O + - c. Describe all additional services expected to be rendered by the expert. + +- 16. Has the expert served as an expert witness in any other litigatied case in the past 10 years? + +If so, state as to each case: + +- a. The style of the case, the Court in which it was filed and the names and addresses of the attorneys involved. + +- O +- b. Whether the expert was retained on behalf of the Plaice or Defendant. + +A + +- c. The general subject m hich the expert provided services. + +er sworn testimony was given in the case, and, if so, whether the expert or ou are in possession of a transcript of the testimony. + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +STATE OF \_\_\_\_\_) + +COUNTY OF \_\_\_\_\_) + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \_\_\_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_, 2017, by \_\_\_\_\_, who is personally known to me or who has produced \_\_\_\_\_ as identification and who did/did not take an oath. + +( S E A L ) + +\_\_\_\_\_ +*(Notary signature)* + +\_\_\_\_\_ +*(Notary name - print)* + +NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +\_\_\_\_\_ +*(Serial number, if any)* + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +individually, + +individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, J EPSTEIN'S RE I UEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDAN IL O ER-PLAINTIFF REGA Ng EXPERTS \ + +COMES NOW the PlaintiffiCounter-Defe FtEY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules ofCi ocedKre 1.350, requests that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. produce of the undersigned, for inspection, and/or copying the following within thirty (30) days is nest. + +- 1. Copies of any ll depositions of your expert witnesses taken in any other action that are in your possession (O' ding your attorneys). +- 2. all reports rendered by experts applicable to any and all issues in this case. correspondence between counsel for Defendant/Counter/Plaintiff and all experts in this matter, whether electronic or otherwise. +- 4. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, paper, letter, bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, survey, plat or other document or tangible evidence including electronically stored evidence in tangible form, furnished or made available to your expert in connection with this matter. + +5. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, paper, letter bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, diagram, survey, plat, or other document, or tangible evidence, including electronically stored evidence in tangible form or other similar source of information considered or reviewed by your expert or upon which your expert relied in evaluating, investigating or formulating his or her opinions in connection with this matter. + +6. Any other information reviewed by each expert in connection with this . + +7. All documents or tangible items of any nature pertaining to the fol g: + +- a. The scope of your employment of expert witnesses is case and the compensation for such service. +- b. The general litigation experience of your ex percentage of work performed for plainti r fendants. +- c. opinions or evaluations during e 1 0) years. The identity of legal actions in w I\*c s in this case, including the of your expert witnesses rendered +- d. The identity of other cases ' h)8ch of your expert witnesses in this case have testified by deposition o a al ring the last ten (10) years. +- e. An approximatio ion of the expert's involvement as an expert witness, which may be the number of hours, percentage of hours, or percentage of earned in ed from serving as an expert witness. + +8. Copies of an and al Is, invoices, records, memoranda, checks, check stubs, receipts, 1099's, tax records or othe omr of financial information evidencing payment or compensation paid by s ,ff Defendant/Coun O in and counsel for services provided by your expert witnesses for the last ten (10) years. + +9.A 7Your 's expert witnesses' most current curriculum vitae or resume. + +10. Each and every document created by your experts in connection with this matter. + +11. MI articles, books, papers, manuals, studies or similar documents both formal and informal, written by your experts or to which your experts contributed, + +12. Any opinions which were revised or modified. + +- 13. A fee schedule for each and every expert. +- 14. All expert reports of the same expert(s) in your possession or that of your attorneys for any other case within the last ten (10) years. +- 15. Copies of all orders pertaining to your experts including any based on motions to limit or bar their opinions or work including but not limited to those orders related to Frye or Daubert. + +It is requested that aforesaid productions be made in compliance with Florida Rules of Civil .4....,L Procedure, at the law office of W. CHESTER la, JR., P.A., 250 Sout relit]) Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Inspection will be made b Meryvation and/or copying. + +If Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's response will bethatt cop es are av ailable for inspection s at the office of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's counsel, requested that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant provide the Defendant/Counter-Plaint h t e cost of those copies so that they may be obtained by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's + +1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru' t copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached Electroni ern• st, this day of , 2017. + ++6s + +W. CHESTER JR., P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777 - Phone (561) 835-8691 - Fax E-Mail: wcblaw@aol.com wcblawasst@gmail.com + +By: /s/ W. Chester Jr. W. CHESTER JR. Florida Bar No. 261858 + +#### Electronic Service List: + +#### Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Email: mcp@searcylaw.com + +#### Nichole J. Segal, Esq. + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Jaffe, Weissin:,s , et al 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: staff.efile®pathtojustice.com + +### Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Marc S. Nurik, P.A. 809 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 208 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 E-Mail: marc@nuriklaw.com + +#### Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P . 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 14 West Palm Beach, FL 3340 E-Mails: jgoldberger smahone a.com + +#### Fred Hadda + +Haddad & v LC 1 Financial aza, uite 2612 Fort Lauderda , FL 33394 E-Mails: dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +### Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mails: tonja@tonjahaddad.com efiling®tonjahaddad.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..943b7258eeabd5d504a0eb8ac10424727ecaf3ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/EFTA02760284.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,6892 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 136, + "chars": 261257, + "elapsed_seconds": 47.99, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_51_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_51_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_108_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S EMENTAL \nMOTION COMPEL DI 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 305.99 + ], + [ + 473.4183654785156, + 305.99 + ], + [ + 473.4183654785156, + 334.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 334.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 486.276 + ], + [ + 361.4649658203125, + 486.276 + ], + [ + 361.4649658203125, + 500.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 500.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORIES DARED JULY 12. 2017 \u2014 TRIAL WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 542.5340576171875, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 542.5340576171875, + 472.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 472.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER 5. 2017- DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 488.43798828125, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 488.43798828125, + 583.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 583.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION DATED SEPTEMBER 5. 2017 - DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 515.4370727539062, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 515.4370727539062, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT WITNESS DISCOVERY DATED OCTOBER 13. 2017", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.1150207519531, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.1150207519531, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.832, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.9591369628906, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.9591369628906, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 266.832, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFICATE OF S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 391.068, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 391.068, + 335.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 335.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.608, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.5882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.5882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING /14RR c GATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 290.4928283691406 + ], + [ + 460.6575012207031, + 290.4928283691406 + ], + [ + 460.6575012207031, + 355.6446838378906 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 355.6446838378906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 364.44610595703125, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 364.44610595703125, + 98.853515625 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 98.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nhENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 128.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 128.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nINTERROGATORIES TO BRADLEY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 484.76348876953125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 484.76348876953125, + 356.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 356.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 364.10284423828125, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 364.10284423828125, + 519.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 519.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.968, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.804, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 364.1410827636719, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 364.1410827636719, + 168.603515625 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 168.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER: CO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 260.01 + ], + [ + 431.48443603515625, + 260.01 + ], + [ + 431.48443603515625, + 278.853515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 278.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 437.5575866699219, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 437.5575866699219, + 118.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 118.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 543.310546875, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 543.310546875, + 117.363037109375 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 117.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e \nNOTICE OF \nROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.316, + 318.361572265625 + ], + [ + 469.07659912109375, + 318.361572265625 + ], + [ + 469.07659912109375, + 341.60302734375 + ], + [ + 179.316, + 341.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 369.1353759765625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 369.1353759765625, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OGATORIES \nTO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLE J. ARDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 535.071044921875, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 535.071044921875, + 286.8630676269531 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 286.8630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFi1i61J AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.8839111328125, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.8839111328125, + 452.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 452.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 479.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 479.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 373.4116516113281, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 373.4116516113281, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DAMAGES INTERROGATORIES TO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 210.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 210.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 470.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 470.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 138.61314392089844, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 138.61314392089844, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 180.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 404.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 404.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 304.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 305.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Liabilities Face Amount ($) airl1arket Value ($)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.88999938964844, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 504.78009033203125, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 504.78009033203125, + 307.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 71.88999938964844, + 307.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 553.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(C) Aircraft", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 131.6208038330078, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 131.6208038330078, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(D) Fractional", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 142.72500610351562, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 142.72500610351562, + 182.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 182.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:r 4S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 169.8788299560547, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 169.8788299560547, + 541.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 541.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 138.2207794189453, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 138.2207794189453, + 362.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 362.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 224.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 224.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 373.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 373.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 604.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 604.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 416.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 416.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 487.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 487.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 263.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 263.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 669.06 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 669.06 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 685.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 685.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 609.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 609.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 625.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 625.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 265.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 265.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 541.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 541.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 166.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 456.03 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 138.66041564941406, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 138.66041564941406, + 85.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 138.24313354492188, + 238.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 238.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 138.2207794189453, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 138.2207794189453, + 486.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 677.16 + ], + [ + 138.2744903564453, + 677.16 + ], + [ + 138.2744903564453, + 692.6835174560547 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 692.6835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 306.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 306.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 511.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 138.6405792236328, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.3367919921875, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.3367919921875, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 476.20428466796875, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 476.20428466796875, + 336.363037109375 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 336.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.64, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 287.64, + 132.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DAMAGES INTERROGATORIES TO J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 114.68701171875 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 114.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 264.87 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.308, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 250.308, + 264.87 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Liabilities Face Amount ($) Fair rket &lue ($)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.76000213623047, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 502.4718017578125, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 502.4718017578125, + 267.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 71.76000213623047, + 267.3170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(C) Aircraft", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 132.090087890625, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 132.090087890625, + 115.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 115.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(D) Fractional", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 141.56314086914062, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 141.56314086914062, + 183.68701171875 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 183.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY 'S \nREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT/CO TER- AINTIFF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 509.6513977050781, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 509.6513977050781, + 286.863037109375 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 286.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ITEMS TO BE PRODUCED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.8485412597656, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.8485412597656, + 506.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 506.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ")2ESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERID 419PENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUES TS \u2022 \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAIN \n-", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 288.4618835449219 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 288.4618835449219 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 372.363037109375 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 372.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 160.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICING EX PE RI IN l'ERROG i fiSt ,\nTO J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 355.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 355.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 180.09925842285156, + 72.363037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 72.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 101.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 101.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 185.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 185.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 469.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 469.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 568.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 568.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 653.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 653.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT INTERROGATORIES TO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 494.3367919921875, + 93.363037109375 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 93.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, J EPSTEIN'S \nRE I UEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDAN IL O ER-PLAINTIFF \nREGA Ng EXPERTS \\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 355.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 355.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 180.0298614501953, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 180.0298614501953, + 64.863037109375 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 64.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack Scarola, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 155.25253295898438, + 93.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 93.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Nichole J. Segal, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 170.62252807617188, + 178.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 178.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Marc S. Nurik, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 163.87252807617188, + 377.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 377.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 190.50253295898438, + 461.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 461.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fred Hadda", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 560.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 560.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 629.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 629.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 213.75253295898438, + 646.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 646.1030120849609 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760284" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_108_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_108_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1414da24beabd8f40e963a9fc315a2bcc7123696 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_108_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:020aa462ab3ffe1c7f2106a7b0cc105a82b69a871dd630a05e8fcaee40a3677a +size 15992 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfc607d4ab89e207fc8a0699f5f49aad9596fcbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:176ed7bce90b57dd239215add3cded2ceb0da6cf30802cc63402c19e3ce28bbc +size 12817 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..784c704e2bc46fcc6fbed7edcee3b1299436a693 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760284/_page_51_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8fe1749922594dd4d3e6c8fda054db5851fd8349388f8d3715a5b3d22da3738a +size 15103 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca0d793e92493fc0a784e5e02eb1cd4c253aa332 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually. J. individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defe:idants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +-n r rn + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the und called up for hearing the following: + +( S H4 + +DATE: August 3, 2010 + +TIME: 8:45 A.M. + +JUDGE: Judge David F Aro Cciatir + +PLACE: 205 N. xie Ht way, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM: 9C + +SPECIFIC MATT tTO B HEARD: + +PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST AND REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she has contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771 or (V) 1-800-955-8770- via Florida Relay + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 9 11tday of July, 2010 to : + +G M.=, Jr., Esq. , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 C ) + +odndy J. Janis, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 647896 1... Ackerman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +afte-wv9V" \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..394f7df177f4f3f8b5774a83e38e0f5cd48ad1c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420/EFTA02760420.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760420.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1984, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.043, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 538.479, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 538.479, + 113.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 290.043, + 113.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.567, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 368.18505859375, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 368.18505859375, + 310.17852783203125 + ], + [ + 234.567, + 310.17852783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760420" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760422/EFTA02760422.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760422/EFTA02760422.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e6029fce1d66c8b1b010b084d15416f02c5af0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760422/EFTA02760422.md @@ -0,0 +1,391 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO +FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 90.202 AND 90.203** + +Counter-Plaintiff, ██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby requests, pursuant to the Section 90.202(5) and (6) and Section 90.203, Fla. Stat., that this Court take judicial notice of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, New York State Sex Offender registration information, which is maintained by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services at the following url: + +[http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha\\_challenge\\_field=03AHhf\\_51eLO9zflBJrOj6nFIZ9bFX-NJqrpq6v5OhzYiJrjVXGxVDm9EzTzOPlx6WkZdgBnybEGt8ufJFuaPpGbiM44zA6ij62cllvYFrm6nY\\_F\\_mdnRmf6sPU5F5TME\\_NIWhSZNDFEN8VnuwPvMQjKv2yc1BMFkYv7JQSBxdZTwlS5jQUuKkW1aHNREIFbtBV\\_vdxRMj8q-s\\_50Al52fcOh1Efg\\_XKBT7A&recaptcha\\_response\\_field=SIBLEY+BERTARINA&Submit=Search](http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha_challenge_field=03AHhf_51eLO9zflBJrOj6nFIZ9bFX-NJqrpq6v5OhzYiJrjVXGxVDm9EzTzOPlx6WkZdgBnybEGt8ufJFuaPpGbiM44zA6ij62cllvYFrm6nY_F_mdnRmf6sPU5F5TME_NIWhSZNDFEN8VnuwPvMQjKv2yc1BMFkYv7JQSBxdZTwlS5jQUuKkW1aHNREIFbtBV_vdxRMj8q-s_50Al52fcOh1Efg_XKBT7A&recaptcha_response_field=SIBLEY+BERTARINA&Submit=Search) + +A true and correct copy of the referenced Statutes and of the Epstein's New York State Sex Offender registration information is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED], respectfully requests that the Court take judicial notice of the above-described items pursuant to this Request, as well as grant any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8TR day of November, 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmecann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmecann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +# West's Florida Statutes Annotated Title VII. Evidence (Chapters 90-92) Chapter 90. Evidence Code (Refs & Annos) + +West's F.S.A. § 90.202 + +90.202. Matters which may be judicially noticed + +# Currentness + +A court may take judicial notice of the following matters, to the extent that they are not embraced t s. 90.201: + +- (I) Special, local, and private acts and resolutions of the Congress of the United States a y Florida Legislature. +- (2) Decisional, constitutional, and public statutory law of every other state, terri C, il a d jurisdiction of the United States. +- (3) Contents of the Federal Register. +- (4) Laws of foreign nations and of an organization of nati +- (5) Official actions of the legislative, executive, an #.4 W: 'dicial ci atie or jurisdiction of the United States. +- (6) Records of any court of this state or C any pCofrecordoftheUnitedStatesorofanystate,territory,orjurisdiction of the United States. rtments of the United States and of any state, territory, +- (7) Rules of court of any court o ate or of any court of record of the United States or of any other state, territory, or jurisdiction of the Up»fcd States: +- (8) Provisions in printed co cipal and county charters and charter amendments of this state, provided they are available certified copies. +- (9) Rules promulgated by governmental agencies of this slate which are published in the Florida Administrative Code or in bound written copies. +- (10) Duly enacted ordinances and resolutions of municipalities and counties located in Florida, provided such ordinances and resolutions are available in printed copies or as certified copies. +- (II) Facts that are not subject to dispute because they are generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the court. + +![](_page_3_Picture_8.jpeg) + +(12) Facts that arc not subject to dispute because they are capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned. + +(13) Official seals of governmental agencies and departments of the United States and of any slate, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. + +## Credits + +Laws 1976, c. 76.237, § 1; Laws 1977, c. 77-174, § I; Laws 1978, c. 78-361, § 3. + +West's F. S. A. § 90.202, FL ST § 90.202 + +Current through the 2017 First Regular Session and Special "A" Session of the 25th Legi + +End or Document 0 2017 Thomson Reuters. N claim t original U.S. Government Works. + +West's Florida Statutes Annotated Title VII. Evidence (Chapters go-92) Chapter go. Evidence Code (Refs & Annos) + +West's F.S.A. § 90.203 + +90.203. Compulsory judicial notice upon request + +Currentness + +A court shall take judicial noticc of any matter ins. 90.202 when a party requests it and: + +- (1) Gives each adverse party timely written notice of the request, proof of which is file adverse party to prepare to meet the request. lL e curt, to enable the +- (2) Furnishes the court with sufficient information to enable it to take judici orthe matter. + +A mrai..Nl + +# Credits + +Laws 1976, c. 76-237, § I. + +West's F. S. A. § 90.203, FL ST § 90.203 + +Current through the 2017 First Regular Session and 4ess "A SAH' ion CIC) of the 25th Legislature + +End or Document O 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. + +![](_page_6_Picture_3.jpeg) + +# Additional Offender Photos + +Offender ID : 33216 + +Name : EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +![](_page_6_Picture_8.jpeg) + +03/28/2017 + +![](_page_6_Picture_10.jpeg) + +03/12/2012 + +![](_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg) + +Offender Id + +Last Name + +First Name + +Middle Name + +DOB + +Sex + +Risk Level + +Designation + +# Current Addresses + +Type + +County + +03/18/2016 + +![](_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg) + +![](_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg) + +E + +Jan. 20, 1953 + +Male + +3 + +No Designation Applies + +RES (Primary) + +Close Photos + +Race + +Ethnicity + +Height + +Weight + +Hair + +Eyes + +Corr. Lens + +Photo Date + +03/29/2013 + +![](_page_6_Picture_16.jpeg) + +Unknown + +6' 00' + +180 + +Gray + +Blue + +April 13, 2017 + +Type County Address RES (Secondary) 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH, Florida 33480 + +Type County Address RES (Secondary) GREAT ST JAMES , Virgin Islands + +Type RES (Secondary) Country France Address JEFFREY EPSTEIN 22 AVENUE FOCH APT 2DD PARIS 75116 FRANCE + +O + +AS + +Type RES (Secondary) County New York Address 9 E 71ST ST NEW YORK, New York 10021-4102 + + amount of such retained proceeds allocated to you as distinguished from your law firm (whether or not paid to you) and your share of the fee payable. + +Interrogatory #30 propounded by Epstein therefore sought a line-item breakdown of every payment made from the settlement proceeds received from the settlements of clai LM, EW, and Jane Doe. Epstein made clear that this request included not only paynf p of ttlement proceeds made to third-parties, but also the exact amounts of the settlem Beds retained by Mr. and/or his law firm to satisfy attorney fee and cost tient...Clearly, the sum of these line-items would equal the total settlement monies paid by, ENtein to resolve the sexual abuse \") claims at issue. Essentially, Epstein was requesting a copyoffthe settlement statements prepared for LM, EW, and Jane Doe. + +## B. Interrogatory #31 + +31. State, identify, as 'be with particularity any and all trust arrangements, guardian arrangements, custodial arrangements, or similar arrangements, including accounts established by and/or for the benefit of each of LM, EW, and Jane Doe regarding the receipt, administration, and/or payment or distribution of the proceeds of settlement of claims by LM, EW, or Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response a description of the agreements, contracts and instruments, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto pursuant to which such arrangements were established, the dates of the same, the names, addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers fo all settlors, grantors, trustees, guardians, custodians, other fiduciaries and beneficiaries (including, without limitation, contingent beneficiaries) of such arrangements, the names of the account holders, the names of the authorized signatories, the account numbers and the names, addresses, telephone numbers of individual contacts of the financial institutions for all accounts established to receive and hold such proceeds of settlement. + +Interrogatory #31 propounded by Jeffrey Epstein requested Mr. to "describe with particularity" all financial structures and accounts established for LM, EW, and Jane Doe "regarding the .. . payment or distribution of proceeds of settlement of claims by LM,,EW, or Jane \_ Doe" and required that Mr. Edward include "a description of the agreemetats"-In question. Although the specifics are clearly protected by the attorney-client and w ct privileges, Mr. answered this interrogatory subject to the constraints of eges by providing the total amount of settlement proceeds eligible to be placed in ch accounts. This disclosure was made per Epstein's request to describe the accounts 'ty," without Mr. waiving his validly asserted objections. + +Suffering from a severe seeking sanctions against Mr. and undersigned counsel for simply responding to this uyer's remorse, Epstein has filed the instant motion discovery request. Epstei es that by fulfilling their obligations under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, wards and undersigned counsel violated the confidentiality provisions of the settle n ments between Epstein and victims LM, EW, and Jane Doe. In support, Epstein e following unpersuasive arguments: (1) the interrogatories did not call for disclosure of the aggregate settlement amounts; and (2) even if they did, Mr. failed to + +## Manorand i of Law + +adhere to the notice requirements contained in the settlement agreements at issue.' For the reasons set forth below, each argument should be rejected. + +# A. Epstein's Interrogatories Requested the Amount of All Settlement Proceeds. + +As an initial matter, Epstein is estopped from complaining that the settle s were disclosed in discovery because Epstein is the one who requested that the i be disclosed in the first place. Equitable estoppel is "based on principals of fair pl and ntial justice [that] arises when one party lulls another party into a disadvan legal position." Bueno v. Workman, 20 So. 3d 993, 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The f equitable estoppel are: (1) a representation as to a material fact that is contrary a served position, (2) reliance on that representation, and (3) a change in position d ASly the representation and reliance thereon. o the party claiming estoppel, caused by + +Florida courts have applied estoppel in a myriad of circumstances to prevent one party from taking an unfair adv tag of another. See. e.g., Glantzis v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 573 So. 2d 1049, 1051 (F(aAtla DCA 1991) (holding that a party was equitably estopped from ( relying on a status limitations defense where that party lulled the opposition into a false sense + +Epstein abo suggests that sanctions are warranted because Mr. filed his interrogatory answers in the court record. This argument, however, is unavailing because it is premised on Epstein's mistaken belief that the interrogatories he drafted and served did not require Mr. to disclose the settlement amounts in the first place. Moreover, even considering this argument on the merits, Rule 1.340(e) makes clear that interrogatory answers "may be filed ... when the court should consider the answers to interrogatories in determining any matter pending before the court." The 2011 committee notes to Rule 1.340(e) state that the filing of answers is permissible as long as the party has "good cause." Mr. respectfully submits that opposing summary judgment constitutes "good cause" to file the answers into the court record. See Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.510 (c) (stating that the court may consider answers to interrogatories when ruling on a motion for summary judgment). + +was made from the settlement p particular, Epstein sought the received by each victim: Epstein certainly lulled Mr. Edwaa%alse sense of security by propounding discovery under Rule 1.340 requiring a led Nakdown by amount, of every distribution that d by Epstein to victims LM, EW, and Jane Doe. In ng information with regards to the settlement proceeds + +of security, which the Court deemed a "gotcha" practice); Rodriguez v. Di Lido Beach Hotel Corp. 750 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (judgment in favor of the defendant, predicated on plaintiff's failure to give the proper address of the property at issue was reversed and the court held defendant equitably estopped from raising as a defense the failure of the complaint to Atvri c the right address of the property at issue, when defendant knew of the error but fai it until after statute of limitation had run); Quality Shell Homes & Supply Co. v. jkole 6 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966) (employer who refused injured worker's Acl e for payment of workers' compensation benefits by telling him no workers' co nefits were available, was equitably estopped from raising worker's compen usive remedy as a defense). + +- The airiclisof all proceeds paid to third-parties (e.g. distributions to satisfy medical ce liens, if any) e amount of all proceeds paid to the victims' attorneys to satisfy any cost liens; +- The amount of all proceeds paid to the victims' attorneys for attorney fees; and +- The amount of all net proceeds received by LM, EW and Jane Doe. + +There is no doubt that this request sought to recreate the settlement statement prepared for each victim. In fact, Rule 1.340(c) would have permitted Mr. to simply attach copies of the settlement statements in response, and Epstein even invited Mr. to do so in the 'Definitions' portion of the Interrogatories, where Epstein made clear that "[i]n lieu of identifying any document, a true and correct copy may be annexed to and incorporated in the answers to these interrogatories." + +ersigned counsel for simply ded in the first place. When of each and every distribution of ch a response sought the total amount of Epstein cannot now seek to sanction Mr. responding to the interrogatories that Epstein drafted Epstein sent interrogatories requesting a line-item the settlement proceeds, did he not unders itV the settlement proceeds paid by Epstei disbursements were all added to is required to respon hat did he think would happen when the individual ardless, Epstein cannot propound discovery that Mr. er Florida law, and then seek sanctions when Mr. simply answers the quest at Epstein chose to ask. Such underhanded conduct is the exact .7" type of "gotcha" tion practice that is foreclosed by the principle of equitable estoppel. See Glantzis, 573 o. at 1051. + +# B. s Had Notice of the Interrogatories: He Was The One Who Served Them! + +Next, Epstein contends that, even if the interrogatories he drafted called for the disclosure of the settlement amounts paid to LM, EW, and Jane Doe, Mr. should have provided + +Epstein notice of that fact. In support of this rather circular reasoning, Epstein points to the following language in the settlement agreements: + +If any of the Parties are served with a valid subpoena, court order, government agency order or subpoena, or other compulsory legal process, pursuant to which disclosure of this Settlement Agreement, the settlement amount, or other terms hereof is requested, the Party so served shall give counsel for the other Party notice thereof within five (5) days of such service and, prior to making such disclosure, shall give counsel to such other Party at least ten (10) days to commence necessary proceedings to obtain a court order preventing, limiting, or otherwise restricting such disclosure ... + +See Epstein's Mot. at p. 2 (emphasis added). + +\ This language, by its very terms, concerns situations where a signatory to the settlement agreements at issue is not a party to litigation where there is a pending request calling for disclosure of information covered by those etements. Specifically, by permitting a potentially aggrieved party to the settlement agr n (10) days to commence necessary proceedings to obtain a court order ..." e alleged confidential information at issue, the language allows a non-party to intervene in pending litigation to, for example, quash a pending subpoena for information deemed cdnfidential under the settlement agreements between Epstein and his victims. The notice requirement is necessary because without it the non-party to the litigation would havenevericnow that confidential information may be called for in answering certain discovery requests. Such is not the case here, where Epstein clearly had notice of the discovery he drafted and served. Why would Mr. be required to give Epstein notice of something Epstein created? And Epstein had thirty (30) days to withdraw his interrogatories before Mr. + +answers came due (rather than the mere ten (10) days provided for in the settlement agreement), and he did not need a Court order to do so. The Court should reject this baseless argument. + +## Conclusion + +I II - I Epstein, through counsel, drafted and served detailed interrogatories requesting a line-item Li breakdown of how his victims' settlement proceeds were disb V Epstein wanted to know who was paid, when they were paid, and exactly how much n received. Epstein wanted to recreate the settlement statements received by Ltd, d Jane Doe, and in the absence of privilege restrictions, Mr. would ha filed to provide copies of those documents under Rule 1.340(c) in response to thes rrogdfories. + +Mr. Virtually all of the requeste information is privileged and shielded from discovery. Still, was required to provide all non-privileged information in response to Epstein's discovery request, and he th,refore provided the total amount of the settlements paid to LM, EW, and Jane Doe. Surely, Epstein understood that by requesting a line item breakdown of every single disbursem ntimadeOom the settlement proceeds, he was seeking disclosure of the gross settlement amoun e instant motion, however, suggests otherwise, and Epstein apparently has buyer's remorse over his own discovery. Fortunately for Mr. and undersigned counsel, buyer's remorse is insufficient to establish breach of the settlement agreements, nor does it justify the imposition of sanctions. The Court should therefore deny Epstein's motion. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Sanctions + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of November, 2017. + +![]() + +--- + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +██████████ ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +██████████ Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Sanctions + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester ██████████, Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcbcg@aol.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com; +fred@fredhaddadlaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760431/EFTA02760431.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760431/EFTA02760431.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e05c194a0ee30fbb1a7539b0af43fb4cd71ba3f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760431/EFTA02760431.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,686 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760431.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 18626, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.14, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 538.5283813476562, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 538.5283813476562, + 114.10302734375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 114.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO VIOLATION OF \nCONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREE r ENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-\nEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.05199999999999, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 534.0540771484375, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 534.0540771484375, + 432.10302734375 + ], + [ + 74.05199999999999, + 432.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 597.0939999999999 + ], + [ + 338.24761962890625, + 597.0939999999999 + ], + [ + 338.24761962890625, + 611.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 611.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Intelsat\u00b0 S es at Issue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 368.0031433105469, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 368.0031433105469, + 421.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 421.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Interrogatory #30", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 194.22897338867188, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 194.22897338867188, + 504.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 504.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Interrogatory #31", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 193.19100952148438, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 193.19100952148438, + 434.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 434.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Manorand i of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 364.2906188964844, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 364.2906188964844, + 420.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 246.02400000000003, + 420.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Interrogatories Requested the Amount of All Settlement Proceeds.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 477.0433349609375, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 477.0433349609375, + 199.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 199.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. s Had Notice of the Interrogatories: He Was The One Who Served Them!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 498.22796630859375, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 498.22796630859375, + 587.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 587.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.624, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 340.1322326660156, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 340.1322326660156, + 255.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 255.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760431" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35022e3494da23d703063626fb1cbc227461d051 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.md @@ -0,0 +1,605 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +### SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLE TNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF B + +Counter-Plaintiff, hereby supplements his list of witnesses for altt41411 lA ollows: J. EDW and through his undersigned attorneys, 4 is + +### WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED + +- J. Ed 2.. Jeffrey E in +- 3. icke (formerly = Stephenson ( :2) . eachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 adia do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 +- 5. Guiffre do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800X.X.)0CMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 2 of 22 + +- 6. Maria Farmer do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, +- 7. 4. 41mc New York 10016 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449 +- 8. 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 9 do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York, 10016 +- 9. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Sty Miami, FL 33131 +- 10. Robert C. Jose Podhurst Orsec One S.E. rd Avenu Suite 2700 Miami, FL +- 11. Recarey ch Police Department outh County Road Beach, FL 33480 +12. Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 13. John Connolly do & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020 + +CC.) + +"S 4A) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 3 of 22 + +- 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 15. do Adam llorowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 16. Antonio (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida +- 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 18. Records Custodian of Unit for the Southern District S? 4rney's Office +- 19. Records Custodi eral Bureau of Investigations +- 20. Spencer Kuvin, 1800 S. A tmlian venue, #400 West Palm Florida 33409 +22. Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor New York, NY 10017 +- 21. re Leopold, Esquire Istein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +faDV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-PlaintiffOE + +Page 4 of 22 + +- 24. Isidro M. IME Esquire fl aw Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O +- 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola West Palm Beach, FL 33409 W s Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. /% 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 'Cl\I 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +C ' + +1C) + +# WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES + +- 28. Adrian Mucins 1040 South Sho Miami Beach, FL 33 141 +- 29. Land6h Thotyias York Times th Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022 +- 31. LaVecchio United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +- 36. +- 32. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 33. Evgenia Ignatieva 1650 Broadway, #910 New York, NY 10019 +- 34. 536 N. Edinburgh Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90048 +- 35. Angelique do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Sui Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 ( (c, do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney S art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac vd. West Palm Be FLJ 409 +- 37. Ashley Da do rt l3, iosefsberg, Esq. Past Orseck, PA rd Avenue, Suite 2700 ', FL 33131 randy Brenson do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 +- 39. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3nd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 5 of 22 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +41. William Scherer, Esquire 4. 41mc 633 S Federal Hwy #800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 + +43. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suitt Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 4 414/ , + +44. 1212 N. Clark Street West Hollywood, + +45. ght do Robert. Jose rg, Esq. Podhurst PA One . 3 venue, Suite 2700 One • • FL 3131 + +46. fer obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +47. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 7 of 22 + +- 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SWIA IAA + +- 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown + +- 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +- 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 + +- 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, F 934gt amir St + +- 53. do Adam Horo Horowitz 425 North Avenue, Suite 2 FortBaude le FL 33301 + +- 54. Lei h Lc/o obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. o urst Orseck, PA ne S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +- 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 8 of 22 + +56. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +57. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +58. Tod Meister +101 Seminole Avenue +Palm Beach, FL 38480 + +59. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +60. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +61. Saige Gonzales +c/o Spencer Kuvin +1800 South Australian Ave #400 +West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +62. [REDACTED] +c/o Marshall Dore Louis +40 NW third Street, Suite 200 +Miami, FL 33128 + +63. Jason Richards +Federal Bureau of Investigation +16320 NW 2nd AVE., Miami, FL 33169 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List ofCounter-Plaintiff + +Page 9 of 22 + +64. Esq. Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +65. Esq. Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +66. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +67. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews r ivn te 2 Fort Lauderdale F + +68. do Adam Horowi Horowitz 425 orth rews Avenue, Suite 2 F uder ale FL 33301 + +69. I.A. It Kurkendall -a l eral Bureau of Investigation 6320 NW r d Ave. Miami, FL 33169 + +70. do Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 J. + +CO + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. Page IO of 22 + +- 71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown +- 72. Address Currently Unknown +- 73. 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021 +- 74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 3 +- 77. Any additional indj Office and who supplied as it re +- 78. Leslie W imit Parkway C us, Ohio 43206 Cos entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA. 79 dent Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 +- 80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401 +- 81. Mari tza Vasquez 1293 SW 215` Terrace Miami, FL 33145 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 11 of 22 + +1. 82. Maximilia [REDACTED] + c/o William Unroch, Esquire + 140 West End, Apt. 30-BW + New York, NY 10023 +2. 83. [REDACTED] + c/o Spencer Kuvin + 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +3. 84. [REDACTED] + 2915 Share Rd. 111 + Tallahassee, FL 31312 +4. 85. [REDACTED] + c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + Podhurst Orseck, PA + One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 + Miami, FL 33131 +5. 86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin) + 11675 Glowing Sunset Lane + Las Vegas, NV 89135 +6. 87. Haley Robson + 12247 72ND CT N + West Palm Beach, FL 33412 +7. 88. Michael Fisten + Weston, FL +8. 89. Russell Adler + Delray Beach, FL +9. 90. [REDACTED] Alessi + 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. + Boynton Beach, FL 33472 +10. 91. Janusz Banasiak + 358 El Brillo Way + Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +MW. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 12 of 22 + +92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942 + +96. Rosalie 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently + +98. 301 East ..TH Stmt, Apt. 11P New York, 065 + +99. , South Africa + +040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137 + +101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206 + +102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road + +J. + +COSA + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 13 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +103. Officer Minot +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +104. Sgt. Sorge +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +105. [REDACTED] +Address Currently Unknown + +106. [REDACTED] Pagnano +1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +107. Stephan Kosslyn +28 Garfield Street +Cambridge, [REDACTED] 02138-1802 + +108. Cecile Dejongh +23 S Estate Mafolie +St. [REDACTED] VI 00802 + +109. Tommy Mottola +302 Caribbean Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480-3012 + +110. Mike Sanka +449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101 +Beverly Hills, CA 90212 + +111. [REDACTED] +S/A Witness #108 + +112. William "Bill" [REDACTED] +5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391 +Coral Springs, FL 33076 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800X)DOCMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 14 of 22 + +- 113. Howard Rubenstein 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 +- 114. Robert Meister 101 Seminole Ave. Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 115. Todd Meister 101 Seminole Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 116. President William J. Clinton +- 117. William Hammond 2965 Fontana Place Palm Beach, FL +- 118. Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, #250 West Palm Beach, Flori +- 119. Michele Pagan Palm Beach Pol. 345 South Coun Palm Beach FL 3 0 +- 120. Mic e Da P each Police Department o County Road Beach, FL 33480 ent my Fortimer 12309 North Old Country Road Wellington, FL 33414 +- 122. =.1. 545 East 5 Street, Apt. 6E New York, NY 10009 + +COSA + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff IML + +Page I 5 of 22 + +- 123. 971 NW Fresco Way, Apt. 208 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 +- 124. 3139 Kingston Court, West Palm Beach, Florida +- 125. 9 Pinta Road Miami, FL 33133-2607 +- 126. Latasha Lowe do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 127. 115 Sunshine Blvd West Palm Beach, Floris +- 128. Zack Bryan 1150 Larch Wa Wellington, Flo +- 129. Zinta B 925 >M Ave e 37 eles, CA 90065-3241 13 8 Cobblefield Dr.. ellington, FL 33449 +- 131. Story Cowles 801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 132. Michael Dawson Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 16 of 22 + +133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134 + +134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101 + +135. Sergia 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131 + +136. Cassandra 5011 El Clam Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415 + +137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3 + +138. Address Curren + +139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown + +140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown + +141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 + +142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown + +143. Amazon Records Custodian + +144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +- 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +- 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +- 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL +- 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian O 3344 Forest Blvd., Suite C-I24 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 C.) +- 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 150. Wellington Real Hospital Reco 10104 Forrest Blvd. Wellington, FL 33414 S\,, +- 151. All witnesses that Defer hav listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff +- 152. All rebuttal wi +- 153. All Peopl n Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +## WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION + +- 155. +- 156. Epstein andam Street ew York, NY 10013 Alan 358358 1•1fflo 1ay Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +I ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Page 18 of 22 J. + +> do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL + +- 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +- 159. Jeffrey Epstein +- 160. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz 425 North Law h Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 \ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 EXPER"SSSES + +- 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Sc art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac lvd. West Palm Beac 3409 + +CO + +The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di t he prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +- 162.N scert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +- 167. Isidro M. = Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire S ue 1600 Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL +- 169. William Berger, Weiss, Handler, I, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, uite 218A Boca Rato 33431 +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire \_Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 A(Iptc Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 "S C) + +Plaintiff reserves 44 ght / to amend this list. + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff a + +Page 19 of 22 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 20 of 22 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 21 of 22 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire + +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire + +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com + +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-655-4777 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 22 of 22 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4ef8f6129ca21cca1ae9fffd57fc64c49c0b103 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443/EFTA02760443.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,907 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760443.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 22, + "chars": 18540, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLE TNESS LIST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 480.4562683105469, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 480.4562683105469, + 364.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 364.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS \nED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 431.694 + ], + [ + 436.3478088378906, + 431.694 + ], + [ + 436.3478088378906, + 446.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 446.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 439.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 439.4730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED \nBY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 466.727783203125, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 466.727783203125, + 534.4824829101562 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 534.4824829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 72 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760443" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58435cb6c7cb28609967dcb226f0c1268e157464 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.md @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +## COUNTER-PLAINTIFF AMENDE + L Y 49J. LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-P Amended Exhibit List as follows: LEY J. and hereby files his + +- O. No objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All objectio pt authenticity +- 3. Irrelev +- aterial +- 4. Pro ve value substantially outwei ed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +CO SA + +## O OBJECTIONS + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, . and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Amended Exhibit List + +| Counter-Plaintiff | Marked Marked for | +|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| No. | Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1 | All applicable criminal statutes. | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes. | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. \ C c\ | +| 7. | Messages taken from message s fo at Epstein's home. | +| 8. | Documents related to Je y p in produced by | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein's High | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein'tEllff e records. | +| 11. | Sarah 1 's phone records. | +| 12. | it it: ;on Logs. | +| 13. | e y Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, nd L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints. | | | | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | | | | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). | | | | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | | | | +| 24. | 2002 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book. | | | | +| 25. | 2001 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book. | | | | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book. | | | | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation. | | | | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction. | | | | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 00XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J MI, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|---------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | | | | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | | | | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, .1. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +| Case | No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection 14 Evidence Identification | +| | s, J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | +| | O AS | +| 42 | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared agJeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists. | | | | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | | | | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey. | | | | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto. | | | | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause. | | | | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits. | | | | +| 109. | [REDACTED] reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits. | | | | +| 110. | [REDACTED] reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA04080.1XMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, [REDACTED] is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | | | | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to [REDACTED] objections. | | | | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by [REDACTED] on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | | | | +| 114. | [REDACTED] Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto and all Undisputed Facts. | | | | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | | | | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | | | | +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | | | | +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | | | | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | | | | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 121. | Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009M300XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J EMI, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | | | | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case. | | | | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | | | | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017. | | | | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009. | | | | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013. | | | | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013. | | | | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012. | | | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | | | | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile. | | | | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein,M a and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, JIM, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein,M J. | and L.M. | +|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff's, | J. , Amended Exhibit List | +| Counter-Plaintiff | Marked Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit Objection • Evidence Identification | +| 133. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or | +| 135. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 136. | Any and all depositions taken in this action.c | +| 137 | Any documents or other exhibit attac during | +| 138. | Any and all exhibits, documen tc. rred to in any | +| 139. | Any and all documents-and exhibits designated by all parties | +| 140. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | +| 142. | Any Ncords produced or that will be produced by all | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiffs, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..853471f4f232bc5b74e33dbe383251bc545e3270 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465/EFTA02760465.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,607 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760465.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 52650, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.6875 + ], + [ + 494.9700012207031, + 72.6875 + ], + [ + 494.9700012207031, + 128.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 128.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nAMENDE \n+ L Y 49J. \nLIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 446.148, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 446.148, + 404.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 404.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 444.6875 + ], + [ + 374.86944580078125, + 444.6875 + ], + [ + 374.86944580078125, + 459.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 459.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 132.84 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760465" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c465b0ee5710f71dd1456149b9b35d8124372c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.md @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'tSU MENTAL MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL' + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff") supplements his motion for continuance pursuant to Rule 1.460 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for a brief 90-day continuance of the special set 10-day trial commencing on December 5, 2017, based on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Edwards a") filing last night of a Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List, naming eight (8) new expert witnesses. + +# INTRODUCTION + +Plaintiff supplements his request for a 90-day trial postponement based on Defendant's filing last night of new expert witnesses. Although this lawsuit was filed in December 2009, this case remained outside of this Court's jurisdiction - pending either in the Fourth District Court of Appeal's jurisdiction or the Florida Supreme Court - until the state's highest court declined jurisdiction on in June 2017. In July 2017, this Court issued an Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +I Counsel for Defendant opposed Plaintiff's original Motion for Continuance. + +for a ten-day trial less than five months away, starting December 5, 2017. By this Court's Order, the parties were required on the last business day no later than 60 days prior to trial to exchange trial exhibits and witnesses, including "names and addresses of all expert witnesses."This deadline for compliance with the Court's Order was Friday, October 6, 2017. + +Despite this, last evening, Defendant filed Defendant's Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List, adding two (2) never before disclosed Expert Witnesses and moving six (6) Fact Witnesses into the "Expert Witness" column. Plaintiff continues to be prejudiced by Defendant's change in damages claim with the original expert first nailed October 6, 2017, and further prejudiced by the addition of eight (8) new experts belatedly disclosed. Therefore, Plaintiff supplements his request for a trial postponement of 90 days. + +# ARGUMENT + +### DEFENDANT'S UNTIMELY ADDITION OF EIGHT (8) EXPERT WITNESSES, TWO NEVER BEFORE DISCLOSED FURTHER SUPPORTS PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREPARE FOR TRIAL DUE TO EVENTS OUTSIDE OF HIS CONTROL. + +As previously expressed, Plaintiff needs to identify and hire an expert to address the extent to which Plaintiff's allegations damaged Defendant's reputation and the testimony of Defendant's newly disclosed expert who will be testifying on this subject. This was the basis of Plaintiff's original motion requesting trial postponement because Defendant's first expert witness, Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D., contradicted Defendant's answers to damages interrogatories by adding reputational damages. + +More than one month past the disclosure deadline pursuant to this Court's trial Order, last evening at 5:20:40P.M. on November 9, 2017, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. filed his Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List, identifying for the very first time two (2) additional witnesses: + +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Sutie 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 169. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Cornwell, P.A. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +In addition to the above never-before-disclosed expert witnesses, Defendant/ ter-Plaintiff newly identified previously disclosed Fact Witnesses as now Expert Witn + +"The following witnesses are attorneys that are not retained r sppcially employed to mil expert testimony, but may provide opinions relating o the propriety of Brad conduct of discovery in the prosecution of the Epstein claims." + +- 162. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esquire +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire +- 167. Isidro M. Garcia, Esquire + +"The decision to grant or deny a continuance is within the trial court's discretion and that decision will nokbetturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion." Taylor v. Inst. for Med. Weight .2d 398, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In determining whether the trial judge has abus iscretion, a reviewing court should consider "whether the denial of the continuance creates an injustice for the movant; whether the cause of the request for continuance was unforeseeable by the movant and not the result of dilatory practices; and whether the opposing party would suffer any prejudice or inconvenience as a result of a continuance." Fleming v. Fleming,710 So.2d 601, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). + +Because of this late disclosure and change in position regarding the damages claimed by Counter-Plaintiff, Plaintiff now needs the discovery Defendant claimed was irrelevant and also must identify and retain an expert to testify about, among other things, the number of people who may have read articles discussing Plaintiff's allegations tying Defendant to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, and the impact this may or may not have had on Defendant's reputation. The expert will need time to study and investigate Defendant's responses to the previously objected to discovery (which the Court should order be produced forthwith) and Defendant's ex 's analysis, perform his own study, draft his own report, and assist Plaintiff's counsel in pre ng take the deposition of Defendant's expert. + +4 Additionally, Defendant's new experts' depositi\ d to be taken as well. All of this cannot be accomplished in a single month. + +# CONCLUSION + +Plaintiff supplements his request for a brief 90-day continuance of the parties' trial date based on Defendant's untimely addition and disclosure of eight (8) expert witnesses, two (2) of whom were never previously disclosed as any type of trial witnesses. Plaintiff would be prejudiced if this trial proceeded on bet 5, 2017, based on the reasons stated in the original motion, as well as the new @ges expert witness disclosures. Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the est r a 90-day trial postponement. + +[Certificate of Service on the Following Page] + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 10, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax All'ac + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991r) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 4903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Seott(ainkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AnacIa@Jinkrocklaw.com Secondary: TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanva(alinkrocklaw.com Sectary: Eservicealinkrocklaw.eom + +1 Counsel for Plaing7Counter-Defendant effrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepeseareylaw.com isxO,searcvlaw.emp searolateam@searevlaw.com Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff .1 Edwards + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs@FLAArmellateLaw.com kbt©FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED], Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +~~TRIAL CONTINUANCE APPROVED:~~ + +Jeffrey E. Epstein +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Dated: November 9, 2017 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..320961e5a291b832b3d0c59f900a8732a0e5ef19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480/EFTA02760480.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,435 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760480.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 10681, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 90.97 + ], + [ + 530.3621215820312, + 90.97 + ], + [ + 530.3621215820312, + 133.103515625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 133.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'tSU MENTAL \nMOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 330.8 + ], + [ + 458.4543151855469, + 330.8 + ], + [ + 458.4543151855469, + 358.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 358.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 502.816 + ], + [ + 351.2286071777344, + 502.816 + ], + [ + 351.2286071777344, + 518.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 518.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.608, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 340.745361328125, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 340.745361328125, + 372.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 372.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT'S UNTIMELY ADDITION OF EIGHT (8) EXPERT WITNESSES, \nTWO NEVER BEFORE DISCLOSED FURTHER SUPPORTS PLAINTIFF'S \nREQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREPARE FOR TRIAL DUE TO \nEVENTS OUTSIDE OF HIS CONTROL.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.548, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 532.0325317382812, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 532.0325317382812, + 439.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 439.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 345.17767333984375, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 345.17767333984375, + 398.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 398.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 399.6499328613281, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 399.6499328613281, + 106.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 106.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 464.12999999999994 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760480" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b7c8d2eb3be0fcf55febe2f90350f97e31a8db2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +documents within the time pe Plaintift7Counter-Defendant, Jeffrek A iet, p n, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350, requests that Defendant/Co c r- in iff, er Rule 1.350 or a shorter time as the Court may order produce the following pursuant to PlaintifffCo r-Defendant's Motion to Shorten the Time to Respond. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE STEIN' PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERC REGARDINC. E TS + +# DEFINITIONS + +c::/m (1Clit ,sication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utteran or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not lira ed to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document' or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if fully set forth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in your possessi n, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All written, paper or printed material of any kind, in ut not limited to: all transmittal slips, memoranda, notes, agendas, notices, books, brochures, calendars, employme les, ouncements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, rg6o conversations, newsletters, transcripts, diaries, ap studies, checks, k ')tubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, mmunkations, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conve quiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in per ry in writing, or by means of any other transmittal devi es, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, Ultraviolet discs, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pictures, voice messages, telegrams, summaries, lis , ations, facsimile transmissions, ke books, agreements, contracts, reports, + +and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; and + +- c. Electronically stored information, electronic, mechanical and electrical records or representations of any kind including, but not limited to: all electronic communications, text messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, network logs, Internet history, document f readsheet tiles, presentation files, database files, desktop publi • source code tiles, object code files, executable files, da management files, text files, portable do nt flfhat files, tabulated data tiles, virtual machine files, XML age files, image files, design tiles, GIS files, system files, 5dln tssmfiles, " disk image files, audio files, video files, backup fil and all originals, reproductions, copies, d c changes, amen (defined he defined \*pt files, project , ra , and all non-identical copies of the foregoing 1"; each individual electronically stored document is an "ESI document"). + +For purpo e foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location n any lectronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appli ce, oud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external N hard state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or not the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communication" and "Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of ESI in the application in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein means any natural person or any entity, int7Rtliig, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, firm, corpojali y 'ted liability company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, association, p department, governmental body, bureau, board, commission, or oth1RTorm of public or private entity. With respect to an entity, Person shall include all s m rand affiliates of the entity, as well as the present and former directors, officers, ero attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the "bbl o the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. usiness, agency, + +5. The terms "you" or "yo mea J. and his representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and e erson acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" Ling to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, ting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, evidencing, expl tioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or in , setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +"Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jetey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. , Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E.W. or any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format" or "TIFF' refer to the CCITT Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. + +10. "Experts" refers to all expert witnesses disclosed on your Seven ded and Supplemental Witness List dated November 9, 2017, and all other indivitals iptenndd to elicit expert testimony from at the trial of this matter including, but not limited to, cmard J. Jansen, Robert C. Josefsberg, Charles Lichtman, Spencer Kuvin, Theodore Leopold, Adam Horowitz, Isidro M. , Earleen Cote and William Berger. + +11. Where appropriate: + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch ud the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the rith o f 1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +1. informs( ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in your po on, custody, or control. (cri res se to this Request for Production, you are required to furnish all + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each Request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +1;Zille + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you i lif, at any ESI document responsive to this Request for Production is not reasonably c Atsis i " : (1) timely identify such ESI document with reasonable particularity, and (2) p ' the is for declining to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limi o access, the likely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the E ent, the method used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in which the cument is kept. + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro. f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("L87"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT"), which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image fil must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains bot ash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the )ge files were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production o files: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Nati o file that is converted to 77FF format: (1) all tracked Chang- 1 aintained so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Emb SS, hall not be extracted as separate documents; (3) author all remain or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, ro wor eets and other hidden data shall remain or be made visibl 5 r ter notes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the exte a foreign language is produced, processing of such ESI icode-compliant. ent Unitization. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + +- c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all meta tact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholderle g the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, ' ' ar it lfIii-Microsoft spreadsheet files, and graphical compilations o ,t l)e t data, shall be produced in Native Format with all cell 'Sty, o , rows and worksheets and other information unhidden . +- f. Ri t to R t ormat files. We reserve the right to demand production ormat of any file produced by you as a TIFF image file. + +# OUESTS FOR PRODUCTION + +- I. rrespo dence between you and the Experts relating to the subject matter of the Lawsuit, tms or defenses of the Lawsuit, or the Experts' opinions in relation to the La + - 3. +- 4. Lawsuits. All correspondence between you and the Experts relating to the Other Lawsuits. All correspondence between the Experts and any persons relating to the Lawsuits. All correspondence between the Experts and any persons relating to the Other + +5. All billing records, invoices, or statements and any and all retainer agreements, engagement letters or other contracts, relating to services performed, or to be performed, by the Experts in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. + +6. All versions (including draft versions, final versions, current versions and prior versions) of resumes, curriculum vitas and biographies for the Experts. + +7. All reports, and all draft versions of those reports, that have been by the Experts or at the direction of the Experts in relation to their involvement • • wsuit. These reports include any written reports, whether typed, handwritt , maintained as electronically stored information, or audio recorded. + +8. All documents drafted by the Experts rel Ictn it subject matter, or claims or defenses, of the Lawsuit. + +9. Copies of any notes made by t e , or provided to the Experts in relation to that Experts' services in this Lawsuit. + +10. All documents prove 1 bfou to the Experts in relation to the services being provided by the Experts in this + +11. All deposi scripts, portions of deposition transcripts, or other statements or written materials vided y you to the Experts in relation to the services being provided by the Experts in th ui . + +y documents prepared by the Experts, provided to the Experts, obtained by the Experts, or reviewed by the Experts, whether intended for their use or not, in connection with this Lawsuit which concern the subject matter of the case. + +13. All literature and documents that the Experts considered relevant to their assignment in this case and which they considered in the development of their opinions or conclusions concerning the subject matter of the Lawsuit. + +14. All documents prepared by the Experts to illustrate or demonstrate any fact or opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to the Experts' assignment, investigation, or opinions. + +15. Without limitation to the time set forth in Instruction No. 2 any articles, e c ) books, papers or other publications prepared by the Experts which facts surrounding the subject matter of this Lawsuit. cts similar to the + +16. Any and all materials considered, consult by the Experts as a basis or predicate for their opinions and conclusions, includ' ,C cia , Al4 b "o imited to, published reports by any private or government agency, textbooks, S 4'c logs y , ta or documents provided by you, or government or industry standards or re ; ' ,.sons. ...e + +trative tools upon which the Experts have or plan to rely, in the formulation and ex of their opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. 17. Any and all models + +18. or made in t 11 n years. orts, testimony or affidavits of the Experts for any other matter given + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. B 80) Primary: Scatt(ibl rtkrocklaw.com Primary: araAlinkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®linIcrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +1.4c icianiet Trial Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, carola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach•l\_akes Boulevard West Palm B-wl; FL 33409 mep@illite0aw.com jsx@sea4law.com scarolateanasearcylaw.com Co-Counselor iendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsa\$LAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseemalendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79d3a20aa810b2df26f47b00d7a17bea7857883d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487/EFTA02760487.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,625 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760487.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 19402, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.14, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE STEIN' \nPRODUCE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERC \nREGARDINC. E TS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 390.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 390.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 512.74 + ], + [ + 349.11614990234375, + 512.74 + ], + [ + 349.11614990234375, + 528.1835327148438 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 528.1835327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OUESTS FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 397.450439453125, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 397.450439453125, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760487" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65546092574384087ea97d7d9df5cb1ecd145105 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.md @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408007OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFEND J. EDWARD IN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE TERCLAIM PLAINTIFF NG EXPERTS + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant, Jeffre pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, hereby gives notice of i e of Interrogatories Regarding Experts upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, B dley, dwards, on November 13, 2017. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that this Notice been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1) and a copy of the Notice and Interrogatories have been served via email. + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. Ma B 80) Primary: S li crocklaw.com Primary: rocklaw.com Prima Arwelattilinkrocklaw corn S TrovQ1inkrocklaw.com : TanyaOlinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +AJ. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3de912f8aecd2b46c3acef88dda5b37252ea87f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499/EFTA02760499.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760499.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4888, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nOF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFEND \nJ. EDWARD \nIN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE \nTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF \nNG EXPERTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 390.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 390.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760499" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..036275b972c95899ee3b878c50a4fb1983546eaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.md @@ -0,0 +1,1416 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Go + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRElia NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-P RTIES + +YOU ARE NOTIFIED that after 10 fi e date of service of this notice, if service is by delivery, or 15 days from the da o s cc, if service is by mail, and if no objection is received from any party, the u on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, will issue the attache 4u oenas directed to the following, who are non-parties, to produce the items listed a uf me and place specified in the Subpoenas: + +- +2. Charles Lichtman Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- C. Jocfsberg u Orseck, PA .E. Third Avenue, Suite 2700 mi, FL 33131 +- 3. Spencer Kuvin 1800 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +- 4. Theodore Leopold Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 +- 5. Adam Horowitz 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 6. Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 7. Earleen Cote Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Suite 1600 c +- 8. William Berger Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A ? s , Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +is) + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. B 80) Primary: Scatt(ibl rtkrocklaw.com Primary: araAlinkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®linIcrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +1.4c icianiet Trial Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, carola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach•l\_akes Boulevard West Palm B-wl; FL 33409 mep@illite0aw.com jsx@sea4law.com scarolateanasearcylaw.com Co-Counselor iendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsa\$LAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseemalendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# TAB 1 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Robert C. Josefsberg Podhurst Orseck, P.A. One S.E. Third Avenue, S Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANCD) to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S •te 3 est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 9:00 a.m. and to have with you e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: A + +4D IIIII \ - + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov C or O % +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed p the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attornp th Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 20 1 7. + ++6s + +\*INK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +> By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelinlcrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.c

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAtidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agree and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do hic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac?I, ation, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten "Stip it da Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if I t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the items which are in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writs or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : rtsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet dis c , tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen \*o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code ct....., files, ob t e files, executable files, data files, script files, project tic, nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all r part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas D t "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communicat' n ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of Yjnn application in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m I person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental bod board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• )erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Robert C. Josefsberg and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffity Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. , Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. . any other clients represented by J. present. against Jeffrey Epstein from t 1 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group 11/ graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,t al, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you ltkiig" at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File' or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sic main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent ign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readshect files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format 'reserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b ou r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no ade by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiop9 i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. Cd1hQi icdtions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you cs tmdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio , r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ ed by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in tit' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A coov of auv ret ef agreement or otheriont between you and James tuns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of Bar. + +# TAB 2 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Charles Lichtman Berger Singennan 300 East Las Olas Blvd., S Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 + +YOU ARE COMMANCBI) to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S 'te 30t. est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 9:30 a.m. and to have with you e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. Von may mail or deliver the conies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Pla

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +1. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. consultations, art + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do or representations, tangible items, and electronically s ation, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten li Ida c Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if 1 t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: hic or auditory records + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet dis c , tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, than ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communicat' Cn .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, erection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Charles Lichtman and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. , Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. . any other clients represented by J. present. against Jeffrey Epstein from r 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group 11/ graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the s e siS,al, and vice versa; ese tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro. f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File' or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • : + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent E3 jl.a, eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be +- b. D compliant. nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readshect files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format 'reserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no aide by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo t in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of aav ret ef agreement or otheritrant between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip it • troceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of .! " Bar. + +C + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) + +**TAB3** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Spencer Kuvin 1800 S. Australian Ave., Suit c c415cLor West Palm Beach, FL 334 oi i + +YOU ARE CO EDj appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 3 esstt Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 10:00 a.m. and to have with you at kh time " afid place the following: + +0 ms will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the conics to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the + +### SEE EXHIBIT A + +time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to apt • ollowing attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys o Subpoena as directed. you shall respond to this + +Dated: November\_, 2017. + +Copies provided to: + +/4 \ + +( LS€ & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 5 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(Minkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dec@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Che

| | + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +4s) + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .)communications' as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the preser d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or `your" mean Spencer Kuvin and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from r 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A copy of apy retd[nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +**TAB 4** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Theodore Leopold Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Sui Palm Beach Gardens, F + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S le 30 est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 10:30 a.m. and to have with youju t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the conies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.c

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the preser d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +A\a\The terms `you" or "your" mean Theodore Leopold and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from r 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A copy of apy retd[nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +# TAB5 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. ,individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Adam Horowitz 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite SLINK Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +YOU ARE CO EDs appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 3 t Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 11:00 a.m. and to have with you at ki time / abd place the following: + +0 ms will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the conics to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the + +### SEE EXHIBIT A + +time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to ap ollowing attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys o Subpoena as directed. you shall respond to this + +Dated: November\_, 2017. + +/4 \ + +( LS€ & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 5 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(Minkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trovalinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Pla

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms 51ou" or 5,our" mean Adam Horowitz and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from r 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A copy of apy retd[nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +**TAB 6** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. ,individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. ° 224 Datura Street, Suite 9 West Palm Beach, FL 3\* + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S le 30 1 est Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 11:30 a.m. and to have with you e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. l'ou may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations of n including, but not limited to: all messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). electronic communicat + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether of e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C• n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m i a I person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp ,c)..., priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental bod board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• P erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • Erection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Isidro M. and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the tet, tal, and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you iliiig" at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF irrl>l Iles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme 8Ss I ., main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lcatl~fi \ produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no ade by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiop9 i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio , r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ red by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A CORY of apy retM'nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a FI t Bar. + +# TAB 7 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Earleen Cote Kubicki Draper One East Broward Blvd., S Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S to 30t,West Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 12:00 p.m. and to have with youjk t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

█████ J. █████
█████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat\* C n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms 5,ou" or 5,our" mean Earleen Cote and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under her control or on her behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from t 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,al, t and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you tAgl, at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DAT) that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF miles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sc main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Formatt lc"NSfi., produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv do r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consul ed by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in tit' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A CORY of apy retM'nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any disci investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of icati ns to you roceedings or Bar. + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) + +**TAB 8** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: William Berger Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P 2255 Glades Road, Suite 2 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S to 30tWest Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 12:30 p.m. and to have with youjk t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +Thbce items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. l'ou may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +#### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat\* C n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean William Berger and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E . any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from t 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer Ato c) C Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,al, t and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you tAgl, at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DAT) that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF miles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sc main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Formatt lc"NSfi., produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv do r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consul ed by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in tit' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A CORY of apy retM'nef agreement or other a ement between you and James 1 for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any disci investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of icati ns to you roceedings or Bar. + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66a137d671cf0201991dae0ef60f5d42e8ec318e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502/EFTA02760502.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,6185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760502.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 116, + "chars": 182496, + "elapsed_seconds": 28.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 114.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 114.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRElia NOTICE OF \nPRODUCTION FROM NON-P RTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 509.00653076171875, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 509.00653076171875, + 376.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 376.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 402.08400000000006, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 402.08400000000006, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760502" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52f2e5c914871c3083d958177ef04bf5c1f102c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.md @@ -0,0 +1,2556 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +,^ PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPS- El S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO RESPOND TO EXPERT INTERROcAVALES, REOUEST TO PRODUCE REGARDING EXPERTS AND NOTICE OF INTENVTO SERVE SUBPOENAS UPON LATE-DISCL bkXPERTS + +Plaintift'Counterclaim Defendant Je tem ("Plaintiff), moves to shorten the time for Defendant/Counterclaim Plainti ra l Edwards ("Defendant") to respond to his Request to Produce Regarding Experts xhib and Interrogatories Regarding Experts (Exhibit B) and raise objections to his No Sit ' c of arIntent to Serve Subpoenas for Documents upon Defendant's newly (and late) disclos pens xhibit C), and in support thereof, states: + +- eo mber 9, 2017, Defendant filed his Seventh Amended and Supplemental With is 1htfi, for the first time, disclosed an additional eight expert witnesses. See Amended and Suppl ental Witness List (Exhibit D). No reports were provided by any of these expert witnesses. +- 2. Under this Court's Trial Order, the disclosure of expert witnesses was due more than thirty days ago. + +3. The disclosure of these expert witnesses necessitates substantial additional discovery by Plaintiff on the opinions and background of these expert witnesses. Because of the late disclosure, however, Plaintiff is unable to wait the length of time under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.340 and 1.350 for a response from Defendant, or the response will be due after the discovery deadline and, even more importantly, after the trial, which is currently sche led to start on December 5, 2017.1 Similarly, under Rule 1.351, if Plaintiff was required t 10, or 15, days to allow Defendant time to object before serving subpoenas on th erts, Plaintiff would be effectively denied the right to conduct discovery, as Plainjf not have time to serve the subpoenas and allow a reasonable time for production CS xperts. + +4. For these reasons, and so that Plaintiff h discovery on these late-disclosed expert witn \, 1 i Motion for Continuance in the Trial. In the aJte laintiff requests that this Court shorten the time for Defendant to respond to t Notice of Intent to three days, so s e time to conduct additional requests that this Court grant his and for Defendant to raise objections to the 'ses and objections are made by November 16, 2017. + +WHEREFORE, Plaint' along with any other relie ourt deems necessary and just. Ily requests that this Court grant the relief sought herein, + +1 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Continuance of Trial, which was heard by this Court on November 7, 2017. This Court took the Motion under advisement, and has not yet ruled, but this late disclosure (after that hearing) is yet another reason that a continuance is not only appropriate, but necessary in this case. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERC REGARD PSTEIN' L INTIFF RTS + +A + +Co's + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, Je EpsWh, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350, requests that Defendant/C - sntiff, documents within the time pe fitted der Rule 1.350 or a shorter time as the Court may order pursuant to Plaintiffito fendant's Motion to Shorten the Time to Respond. J. M, produce the following + +#### DEFINITIONS + +niunication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utteran on or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document' or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if fully set forth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in your possessi n, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All written, paper or printed material of any kind, in ut not limited to: all transmittal slips, memoranda, notes, agendas, notices, books, brochures, calendars, employme les, ouncements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, rg6o conversations, newsletters, transcripts, diaries, ap studies, checks, k ')tubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, mmunkations, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conve quiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in per ry in writing, or by means of any other transmittal devi es, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, Ultraviolet discs, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pictures, voice messages, telegrams, summaries, lis , ations, facsimile transmissions, ke books, agreements, contracts, reports, + +and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; and + +- c. Electronically stored information, electronic, mechanical and electrical records or representations of any kind including, but not limited to: all electronic communications, text messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, network logs, Internet history, document f readsheet tiles, presentation files, database files, desktop publi • source code tiles, object code files, executable files, da management files, text files, portable do nt flfhat files, tabulated data tiles, virtual machine files, XML age files, image files, design tiles, GIS files, system files, 5dln tssmfiles, " disk image files, audio files, video files, backup fil and all originals, reproductions, copies, d c changes, amen (defined he defined \*pt files, project , ra , and all non-identical copies of the foregoing 1"; each individual electronically stored document is an "ESI document"). + +For purpo e foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location n any lectronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appli ce, oud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external N hard state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or not the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communication" and "Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of ESI in the application in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein means any natural person or any entity, int7Rtliig, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, firm, corpojali y 'ted liability company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, association, p department, governmental body, bureau, board, commission, or oth1RTorm of public or private entity. With respect to an entity, Person shall include all s m rand affiliates of the entity, as well as the present and former directors, officers, ero ttoeys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the "bbl o the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. usiness, agency, + +5. The terms "you" or "yo mea J. and his representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and e erson acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" Ling to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, ting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, evidencing, expl tioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or in , setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +"Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jetey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J.M, Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E.W. or any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format" or "TIFF' refer to the CCITT Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. + +10. "Experts" refers to all expert witnesses disclosed on your Seven ded and Supplemental Witness List dated November 9, 2017, and all other indivitals iptenndd to elicit expert testimony from at the trial of this matter including, but not limited to, cmard J. Jansen, Robert C. Josefsberg, Charles Lichtman, Spencer Kuvin, Theodore Leopold, Adam Horowitz, Isidro M. =, Earleen Cote and William Berger. + +11. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po (cri res se to this Request for Production, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each Request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch ud the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the rith o f 1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +1;Zille + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you i lif, at any ESI document responsive to this Request for Production is not reasonably c Atsis i " : (1) timely identify such ESI document with reasonable particularity, and (2) p ' the is for declining to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limi o access, the likely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the E ent, the method used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in which the cument is kept. + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro. f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("L87"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT"), which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image fil must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains bot ash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the )ge files were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production o files: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Nati o file that is converted to 77FF format: (1) all tracked Chang- 1 aintained so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Emb SS, hall not be extracted as separate documents; (3) author all remain or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, ro wor eets and other hidden data shall remain or be made visibl 5 r ter notes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the exte a foreign language is produced, processing of such ESI icode-compliant. ent Unitization. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + +- c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all meta tact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholderle g the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, ' ' ar it lfIii-Microsoft spreadsheet files, and graphical compilations o ,t l)e t data, shall be produced in Native Format with all cell 'Sty, o , rows and worksheets and other information unhidden . +- f. Ri t to R t ormat files. We reserve the right to demand production ormat of any file produced by you as a TIFF image file. + +# OUESTS FOR PRODUCTION + +- I. rrespo dence between you and the Experts relating to the subject matter of the Lawsuit, tms or defenses of the Lawsuit, or the Experts' opinions in relation to the La + - 3. +- 4. Lawsuits. All correspondence between you and the Experts relating to the Other Lawsuits. All correspondence between the Experts and any persons relating to the Lawsuits. All correspondence between the Experts and any persons relating to the Other + +5. All billing records, invoices, or statements and any and all retainer agreements, engagement letters or other contracts, relating to services performed, or to be performed, by the Experts in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. + +6. All versions (including draft versions, final versions, current versions and prior versions) of resumes, curriculum vitas and biographies for the Experts. + +7. All reports, and all draft versions of those reports, that have been by the Experts or at the direction of the Experts in relation to their involvement • • wsuit. These reports include any written reports, whether typed, handwritt , maintained as electronically stored information, or audio recorded. + +8. All documents drafted by the Experts rel Ictn it subject matter, or claims or defenses, of the Lawsuit. + +9. Copies of any notes made by t e , or provided to the Experts in relation to that Experts' services in this Lawsuit. + +10. All documents prove 1 bfou to the Experts in relation to the services being provided by the Experts in this + +11. All deposi scripts, portions of deposition transcripts, or other statements or written materials vided y you to the Experts in relation to the services being provided by the Experts in th ui . + +y documents prepared by the Experts, provided to the Experts, obtained by the Experts, or reviewed by the Experts, whether intended for their use or not, in connection with this Lawsuit which concern the subject matter of the case. + +13. All literature and documents that the Experts considered relevant to their assignment in this case and which they considered in the development of their opinions or conclusions concerning the subject matter of the Lawsuit. + +14. All documents prepared by the Experts to illustrate or demonstrate any fact or opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to the Experts' assignment, investigation, or opinions. + +15. Without limitation to the time set forth in Instruction No. 2 any articles, e c ) books, papers or other publications prepared by the Experts which facts surrounding the subject matter of this Lawsuit. cts similar to the + +16. Any and all materials considered, consult by the Experts as a basis or predicate for their opinions and conclusions, includ' ,C cia , Al4 b "o imited to, published reports by any private or government agency, textbooks, S 4'c logs y , ta or documents provided by you, or government or industry standards or re ; ' ,.sons. ...e + +trative tools upon which the Experts have or plan to rely, in the formulation and ex of their opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. 17. Any and all models + +18. or made in t 11 n years. orts, testimony or affidavits of the Experts for any other matter given + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. B 80) Primary: Scatt(ibl rtkrocklaw.com Primary: araAlinkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®linIcrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Acci ar Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, carola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach•l\_akes Boulevard West Palm B-wl; FL 33409 mep@illite0aw.com jsx@sea4law.com scarolateamasearcylaw.com Co-Counseilielendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsa\$LAppellateLaw.com kbt(4FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counselciliendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +1.340, hereby gives notice of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, B Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant, Je Lps ame E pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure ce of Interrogatories Regarding Experts upon on November 13, 2017. + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFE J. EDW TICE Cs NTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF RDING EXPERTS E + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that this Notice been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1) and a copy of the Notice and Interrogatories have been served via e-mail. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: T +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +mep@scarcylaw.com +jsx@scarcylaw.com +scarolateam@scarcylaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +J. + +Nichole J. Segal +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF NTER-DEFENDANT EFF TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM RTS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je Epslih, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, hereby propounds the fol i rt Interrogatories to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. a and requ th0t e answer the Interrogatories, in writing and under oath, within the time permitte ERv ule 1.340 or a shorter time as the Court may order pursuant to PlaintiffiCounter- er sen dan s Motion to Shorten the Time to Respond. + +0 "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, + +#### DEFINITIONS + +discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document' or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if fully set forth), and includes, by w lustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in yoyr.pQ ssion, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All written, paper or printed material of in , cluding, but not limited to: all transmittal slips, memoran o schedules, agendas, notices, books, brochures, calendars, nt files, announcements, meeting / " minutes, records of ? s isIT records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, sum transcripts, studies, , ts, compilations, facsimile transmissions, pointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank sta t , receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, cony nations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser + ++0 + +- files, virtual machine ?f c , , files, GIS files, s fil , compressed files, disk image files, audio files, video files, , metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, ents, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (de erein as "ESI"; each individual electronically stored document is de fin-' herein as an "ES! document"). 'files, spreadsheet +- c. Electronically stored information, electronic, mechanical an electrical records or representations of any kind including, but no to: all electronic communications, text messages, e-majieett messages, computer logs, network logs, Internet history, files, presentation files, database files, d Ac o ptl5tfshing files, source code files, object code files, executabl es, ,a files, script files, project management files, text files, 8 43" cument format files, tabulated data files, webpage files, image files, design + +? urposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physi n or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the + +discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pictures, voice messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; and + +term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or not the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Document' and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communication" and "Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of ES! in the application in ' such ES! was originally created. ACt + +4. "Person" as used herein means any natural person or ncluding, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, co ration, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, ci ti artnership, business, agency, department, governmental body, bureau, board, co i \s , any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an entity, Person shall S' illseth a ,}subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the present and former directors cers, ployees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or d ontrol of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +5. The terms `5,o or ur" mean J. and his representatives, attorneys, accountants, a d any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. comprising evide to or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, rig, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, laining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +J. 7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E.W. or any other clients represented by present. J. against Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer to the CCITT Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. + +10. "Experts" refers to all expert witnesses disclosed on your Seven 4 Supplemental Witness List dated November 9, 2017, and all other individris expert testimony from at the trial of this matter including, but not limited to, cmard J. Jansen, Robert C. Josefsberg, Charles Lichtman, Spencer Kuvin, Theodore Leopold, Adam Horowitz, Isidro M. =, Earleen Cote and William Berger. ded and tend to elicit + +11. Where appropriate: + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the gri thilIo tense; 1, and vice versa; tr" e th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and eludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# Interrozatory N + +For each Ex that the E a su ase state the subject matter on which the Expert is expected to testify, the date retained, the facts and opinions which the Expert is expected to testify to, and e grounds on which each of the opinions are based. + +# TEFtROGATORIES + +#### Inierroliaton. No. 2: + +For each Expert, please identify any documents, reports, publications, or other written opinions prepared by the Expert relating to the Expert's opinions in this matter. + +# Interroaatory No. 3: + +For each Expert, please provide: + +- (a) the names of all professio, or a member of, stating his or her education (b) +- (c) his or her w associated, add and g tions or societies with which he or she is related 'status with each and inclusive dates of such status; und; and tory, including name of employer, organization with which ss of employer or organization, dates of employment or association ption of work performed in the last twenty-five years. + +#### Inierroliaton. No. 4: + +For each Expert, please state whether he or she has ever been retained, deposed or testified as an expert witness in any other lawsuit and, if so, for each such lawsuit, give the style of the case, the kind of suit involved, the name of the court, the approximate date of the testimony; and the name and address of the parties and attorneys for whom he or she testified, and the area or field in which he or she was qualified as an expert. + +A + +Goes + +# Interrozaton No. 5: + +For each Expert, please state t er entage of the Expert's earned income derived from serving as an expert witness. Izotir + +#### Interrooatory No. 6: + +For each Expert, please state whether the Expert has ever been retained in the past by you or any of your attorneys as an expert witness, and, if so, the style of the case in which the Expert was retained, and the amount paid or consideration received for the service rendered by the Expert. + +#### Interrooaton No. 7: + +For each Expert, please state w of your attorneys as an attome and the amount paid or conside xpert has ever been retained in the past by you or any so, the style of the case in which the Expert was retained, received for the service rendered by the Expert. + +**Interrogatory No. 8:** + +For each Expert, please provide a complete list of all materials reviewed, consulted, or relied upon in forming his or her opinion, including all depositions, documents, publications, exhibits, plans, drawings, ordinances, statutes, etc. + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ +Bradley J. Edwards + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) + +COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_, 2017, by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], who is \_\_\_ personally known to me or \_\_\_ produced \_\_\_\_\_ as identification who, after being duly sworn, on penalty of perjury, deposes and states that the foregoing Answers to Interrogatories are true to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belief. + +\_\_\_\_\_ +Notary Public, State of Florida + +My Commission expires: + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +#### Atht i ARPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J PRODUCTION FR\ ic + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +YOU ARE NOTIFIED that after 10 fro the date of service of this notice, if service is by delivery, or 15 days from the ice, if service is by mail, and if no objection is received from any party, the e , on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, will issue the attach poenas directed to the following, who are non-parties, to produce the items li ed at e ime and place specified in the Subpoenas: + +- I. Joefsberg urst Orseck, PA ± S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2700 iami, FL 33131 + - 2. Charles Lichtman Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + - 3. Spencer Kuvin 1800 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +- 4. Theodore Leopold Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 +- 5. Adam Horowitz 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 6. AH M. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 7. Earleen Cote Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Suite 1600 c +- 8. William Berger Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A ? s , Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +is) + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. B 80) Primary: Scatt(ibl rtkrocklaw.com Primary: araAlinkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®linIcrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Acci ar Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, carola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach•l\_akes Boulevard West Palm B-wl; FL 33409 mep@illite0aw.com jsx@sea4law.com scarolateamasearcylaw.com Co-Counseilielendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsa\$LAppellateLaw.com kbt(4FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counselciliendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr.
W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# TAB 1 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Robert C. Josefsberg Podhurst Orseck, P.A. One S.E. Third Avenue, S Miami, FL 33131 + +YOU ARE COMMANCD) to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S •te 3 est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 9:00 a.m. and to have with you e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: A + +4D IIIII \ - + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov C or O % +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed p the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attornp th Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 20 1 7. + ++6s + +\*INK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +> By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelinlcrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

J. [REDACTED]

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
C

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAtidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agree and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do hic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac?I, ation, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten "Stip it da Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if I t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the items which are in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writs or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : rtsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet dis c , tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen \*o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code ct....., files, ob t e files, executable files, data files, script files, project tic, nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all r part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas D t "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communicat' n ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of Yjnn application in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m I person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental bod board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• )erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Robert C. Josefsberg and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffity Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E.,, ...\., any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group 1V graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,t al, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you ltkiig" at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File' or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sic main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent ign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readshect files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format 'reserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b ou r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no ade by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiop9 i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. Cd1hQi icdtions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo dht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio , r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ ed by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in tit' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of auv ret ef agreement or otherianent between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expatizitiaess set-total -formed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of Bar. + +# TAB 2 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Charles Lichtman Berger Singennan 300 East Las Olas Blvd., S Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 + +YOU ARE COMMANCBI) to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S 'te 30t. est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 9:30 a.m. and to have with you e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. Von may mail or deliver the conies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +1. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. consultations, art + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do or representations, tangible items, and electronically s ation, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten li Ida c Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if 1 t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: hic or auditory records + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet dis c , tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, than ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communicat' Cn .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, erection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Charles Lichtman and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. ,,,...k, . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group 1V graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the s e siS,al, and vice versa; ese tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro. f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File' or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • : + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent E3 jl.a, eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be +- b. D compliant. nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readshect files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format 'reserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no aide by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo t in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in fir' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of auv re eef agreement or otheriment between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expirtSess servlasjaformed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip it • troceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of .! " Bar. + +C + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) + +**TAB3** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +A Cos + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Spencer Kuvin 1800 S. Australian Ave., Suit 44L r West Palm Beach, FL 334 L c ) + +YOU ARE CO EDj appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 3 esstt Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 10:00 a.m. and to have with you at kh time v afid place the following: + +0 ms will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the conics to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the + +# SEE EXHIBIT A + +time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to apt • ollowing attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys o Subpoena as directed. you shall respond to this + +Dated: November\_, 2017. + +Copies provided to: + +/4 \ + +( LS€ & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 5 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(Minkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dec@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester ██████, Jr.
W. Chester ██████, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Cou

| | + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +4s) + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .)communications' as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the preser d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or `your" mean Spencer Kuvin and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. ,,....\., . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 7l1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Forma(' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 • • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A co of apy rem e agreement or otheriment between you and James I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expirSess serviiasjaformed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +**TAB 4** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Theodore Leopold Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Sui Palm Beach Gardens, F + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S le 30 est Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 10:30 a.m. and to have with youju t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. l'ou may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com

| + +**If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.** + +**NOT A CERTIFIED COPY** + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the preser d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +A\a\The terms `you" or "your" mean Theodore Leopold and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. ,,....\., . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 7l1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Forma(' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 • • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A co of apy rem e agreement or otheriment between you and James I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expirSess serviiasjaformed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +# TAB5 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Adam Horowitz 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite SLINK Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +YOU ARE CO EDj appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 3 esstt Palm Beach, Florida, on 2017, at 11:00 a.m. and to have with you at kit time / abd place the following: + +0 ms will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the conics to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to ap ollowing attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys o Subpoena as directed. you shall respond to this + +Dated: November\_, 2017. + +/4 \ + +( LS€ & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 5 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(Minkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trovalinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o> e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C' n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms 51ou" or 5,our" mean Adam Horowitz and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. ,,....\., . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 7l1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Forma(' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the o rsic ,t a1, and vice versa; e tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )r +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to you mdht in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 • • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv tio r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents finished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A co of apy rem e agreement or otheriment between you and James I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expirSess serviiasjaformed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a Fl Bar. + +**TAB 6** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J. individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. (Mail in Sub THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: Law Firm, P.A. ° 224 Datura Street, Suite 9 West Palm Beach, FL 3\* have with you e and place the following: + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +TO: Isidro M. + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S le 30 1 est Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 11:30 a.m. and to + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. l'ou may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations of n including, but not limited to: all messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). electronic communicat + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether of e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat C• n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m i a I person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp ,c)..., priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro 1 , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental bod board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• P erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, • Erection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Isidro M. and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. ,,....\., . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Forma(' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the tet, tal, and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you iliiig" at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT' , which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DA7") that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF irrl>l Iles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme 8Ss I ., main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent i a **eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant.** +- **b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments 0 unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked.** + - **c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color.** + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lcatl~fi \ produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no ade by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiop9 i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 • • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv ti0 , r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ red by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in tit' u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of auv retAfnef agreement or otheriment between you and James I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expErSess serviiasjaformed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip ceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of a FI t Bar. + +# TAB 7 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Earleen Cote Kubicki Draper One East Broward Blvd., S Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S to 30t,West Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 12:00 p.m. and to have with youjk t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +The items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +### EXHIBIT A + +# DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat\* C n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an r• Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms 5,ou" or 5,our" mean Earleen Cote and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under her control or on her behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,al, t and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you tAgl, at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DAT) that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF miles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sc main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Formatt lc"NSfi., produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv do r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consul ed by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of auv re eef agreement or otheriment between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expattzitstess services performed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any disci investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of icati ns to you roceedings or Bar. + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) + +**TAB 8** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION + +(Mail in Sub + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: William Berger Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P 2255 Glades Road, Suite 2 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +YOU ARE COMM to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, S to 30tWest Palm Beach, Florida, on , 2017, at 12:30 p.m. and to have with youjk t e and place the following: + +#### SEE EXHIBIT A + +Thbce items will be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this Subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. l'ou may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this Subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this Subpoena. THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN. + +If you fail to: + +10.448k + +- (1) appear as specified; or +- (2) furnish the records instead of appearing as provided abov e or s)O .1 +- (3) object to this Subpoena, + +you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed ref the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attom S , S t Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Dated: November 2017. + +& ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaWinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelitticrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +[DRAFT] + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester Brewer, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +cos + +#### EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +I. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, a and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do ts, phic or auditory records broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten or representations, tangible items, and electronically s Ac? i nation, and shall have the lIda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if IN t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet di reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi s col , tte tapes, e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chan a ndments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all pr part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Comm unicat\* C n .) ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n p pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m ial person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the prese d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, •trection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean William Berger and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. . any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group IV graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the silec,al, t and vice versa; e tense; th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and hcludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +#### ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you tAgl, at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 r ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document i used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DAT) that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF miles were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo a at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shwa med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded of be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comme Sc main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be compliant. +- b. D nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format eserve the right to demand production in Native Formatt lc"NSfi., produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no a& by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv do r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consul ed by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of auv re eef agreement or otheriment between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expattzitstess services performed for James M, or any clients represented by James in the last ten years. +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any disci investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of icati ns to you roceedings or Bar. + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +#### SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL WITNESS L1ST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys, + +hereby supplements his list of witnesses for trial as follows: + +# WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED + +- 1. \_J.- 2.. Jeffrey Epstein +- 3. +- 4. do Jo n Stephenson 1201 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30339 c/o Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 +- 5. Guiffre do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800X.X.)0CMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 2 of 22 + +- 6. +- 7. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York 10016 do Pe ~ Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York, 10016 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449 +- 8. 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 9 +- 9. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Sty Miami, FL 33131 +- 10. Robert C. Jose Podhurst Orsec One S.E. rd Avenu Suite 2700 Miami, FL +- 11. Recarey ch Police Department outh County Road Beach, FL 33480 +12. Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 13. do & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020 + +C + +O SA + +"S 4A) + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. Page 3 of 22 + +- 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 16. Antonio Figueroa (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida +- 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 18. Records Custodian of Unit for the Southern District S? 4V:rimy's Office +- 19. Records Custodi eral Bureau of Investigations +- 20. Spencer Kuvin, 1800 S. A tmlian venue, #400 West Palm Florida 33409 +22. Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor New York, NY 10017 +- 21. re Leopold, Esquire Istein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +lgrt009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +DV. EPSTEIN + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. IM + +Page 4 of 22 + +- 24. Isidro M. ME Esquire =Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O +- 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola West Palm Beach, FL 33409 W s Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. /% 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 'Cl\I 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +C ' + +1C) + +# WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES + +- 28. Adrian Mucins 1040 South Sho Miami Beach, FL 33 141 +- 29. Land6h Thotyias York Times th Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022 +- 31. LaVecchio !!!Unite !!tes Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 5 of 22 + +32. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +33. Evgenia Ignatieva +1650 Broadway, #910 +New York, NY 10019 + +34. [REDACTED] + +35. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +36. [REDACTED] +c/o Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +37. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +38. Brandy Brenson +c/o Spencer Kuvin +1800 South Australian Ave #400 +West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +39. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +41. William Scherer, Esquire 633 S Federal Hwy #800 4ohlk Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O + +42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 + +43. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law GC Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 ? S e 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suitt + +44. 1212 N. Clark Street West Hollywood, + +45. ght do Robe C Jose rg, Esq. Podhurst PA One 3 venue, Suite 2700 M\* FL 3131 + +46. b'kobert C. Josefsberg, Esq. odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +47. lck,:,, esberg, li Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 7 of 22 + +48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edwards +Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road +London SW1A 1AA + +49. Frederic Fekkai +Address Currently Unknown + +50. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +51. Lesley Groff +c/o Mike Miller +1114 Avenue of the Americas +New York, NY 10036 + +52. Dave Rogers +c/o Bruce Reinhart +505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +53. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +54. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +55. Meagan Dorshel +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 8 of 22 + +56. + +do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +57. + +do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3"I Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480 + +59. + +60. + +do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131 + +do Robert C. Jo Podhurst Orsec One S.E. 3r Aven ,'Suite 2700 Miami, FL + +pe Kuvin South Australian Ave #400 t Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128 + +63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW r d AVE., Miami, FL 33169 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 9 of 22 + +64. + +[REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +65. + +[REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +66. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +67. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +68. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +69. + +Nezbitt Kurkendall +Federal Bureau of Investigation +16320 NW 2nd Ave. +Miami, FL 33169 + +70. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Isidro M. [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A. +224 Datura Street, Suite 900 +West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page IO of 22 + +71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown + +72. Address Currently Unknown + +73. + +74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 3 + +77. Any additional indj Office and who supplied as it re entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA. + +78. Leslie W imit Parkway C4t1 kus, Ohio 43206 + +Cos + +79 dent Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 + +80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401 + +81. Mari tza Vasquez 1293 SW 215` Terrace Miami, FL 33145 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 11 of 22 + +82. Maximilia Cordero +c/o William Unroch, Esquire +140 West End, Apt. 30-BW +New York, NY 10023 + +83. [REDACTED] +c/o Spencer Kuvin +1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +84. [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +85. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin) +11675 Glowing Sunset Lane +Las Vegas, NV 89135 + +87. [REDACTED] + +88. Michael Fisten +Weston, FL + +89. Russell Adler +Delray Beach, FL + +90. Marie Alessi +6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. +Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +91. Janusz Banasiak +358 El Brillo Way +Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 12 of 22 + +92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942 + +96. ?s, + +97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently + +98. + +99. , outh Africa + +nn Dubin 040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137 + +101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206 + +102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road + +J. + +COSA + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 13 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +103. Officer Minot +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +104. Sgt. Sorge +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +105. [REDACTED] +Address Currently Unknown + +106. [REDACTED] Pagnano +1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +107. Stephan Kosslyn +28 Garfield Street +Cambridge, [REDACTED] 02138-1802 + +108. Cecile Dejongh +23 S Estate Mafolie +St. [REDACTED] VI 00802 + +109. Tommy Mottola +302 Caribbean Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480-3012 + +110. Mike Sanka +449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101 +Beverly Hills, CA 90212 + +111. [REDACTED] + +112. William "Bill" [REDACTED] +5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391 +Coral Springs, FL 33076 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 14 of 22 + +113. Howard Rubenstein +1345 Avenue of the Americas +New York, NY 10105 + +114. Robert Meister +101 Seminole Ave. +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +115. Todd Meister +101 Seminole Ave +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +116. President William J. Clinton + +117. William Hammond +2965 Fontana Place +[REDACTED] Palm Beach, FL + +118. Robert Roxburgh +5600 North Flagler Dr, #250 +West Palm Beach, Florida + +119. Michele Pagan +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +120. Michele Dawson +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +121. Amy Fortimer +12309 North Old Country Road +Wellington, FL 33414 + +122. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 15 of 22 + +123. [REDACTED] + +124. [REDACTED] + +125. [REDACTED] + +126. Latasha Lowe +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +127. [REDACTED] + +128. Zack Bryan +1150 Larch Way +Wellington, Florida + +129. [REDACTED] + +130. Larry Morrison +11148 Cobblefield Dr.. +Wellington, FL 33449 + +131. Story Cowles +801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +132. Michael Dawson +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Page 16 of 22 + +- 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134 +- 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101 +- 135. Sergia Cordero 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131 +- 136. Cassandra Rivera 5011 El Clam Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415 +- 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3 +- 138. +- 139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown +- 140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown +- 141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 +- 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown +- 143. Amazon Records Custodian +- 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +elnW. EPSTEIN 009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff a. a + +Page 17 of 22 + +- 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +- 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +- 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL +- 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian O 'S A 3344 Forest .1 13lvd., Suite C-I24 West Palm Beac , FL 33406 C.) +- 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 150. Wellington Re inal Hospital Reco Wellington, FL 414 s,\,, 4 10104 Forrest Blvd. +- 151. All witnesses that Defer hav listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff +- 152. All rebuttal wi +- 153. All Peopl n Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +# WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION + +- 155. +- 156. Epstein andam Street ew York, NY 10013 1" 1.1 1 .L iascl• 358E n o ay Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +DV. EPSTEIN No.: t009CA040800:OOCXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. Page 18 of 22 + +> do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL + +- 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +- 159. Jeffrey Epstein +- 160. Horowitz Law do Adam Horo witz. 425 Noth Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 \ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 EXPER"SSSES + +- 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Sc art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac lvd. West Palm Beac 3409 + +CO + +The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di t he prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +- 162.N scert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +- 167. Isidro M. Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire S ue 1600 Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL +- 169. William Berger, Weiss, Handler, I, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, uite 218A Boca Rato 33431 +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 A(Iptc Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 "S C) + +Plaintiff reserves 44 ght / to amend this list. + +l ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. + +Page 19 of 22 + +O ' + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 20 of 22 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 21 of 22 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. + +Page 22 of 22 + +J. M, Esquire + +staff efile@pathtojusticomn + +Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 A"\' CO 'S Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 5) ? ' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)467-1223 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0cdafcbf7d125694b98185afccd14e93de69686 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618/EFTA02760618.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,8867 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760618.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 170, + "chars": 243784, + "elapsed_seconds": 44.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J \nPRODUCE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERC \nREGARD \nPSTEIN' \nL INTIFF \nRTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 389.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 389.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OUESTS FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 397.450439453125, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 397.450439453125, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF \nOF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFE \nJ. EDW \nTICE \nCs NTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF \nRDING EXPERTS \nE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 536.467041015625, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 536.467041015625, + 389.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 389.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 99.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 498.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF NTER-DEFENDANT EFF \nTO DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM \nRTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 534.8879999999999, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 534.8879999999999, + 390.363037109375 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 390.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 349.0399475097656, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interrozatory N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 528.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 528.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TEFtROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 369.2552490234375, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 369.2552490234375, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Inierroliaton. No. 2:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 179.3131103515625, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 179.3131103515625, + 85.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interroaatory No. 3:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 180.2713623046875, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 180.2713623046875, + 376.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 376.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Inierroliaton. No. 4:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 179.33920288085938, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 179.33920288085938, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interrozaton No. 5:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 179.99270629882812, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 179.99270629882812, + 453.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 453.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interrooatory No. 6:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 183.59071350097656, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 183.59071350097656, + 85.46417236328125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 85.46417236328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interrooaton No. 7:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 179.1788330078125, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 179.1788330078125, + 428.9745788574219 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 428.9745788574219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Interrogatory No. 8:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Atht i ARPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J \nPRODUCTION FR\\ \nic", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 509.0821533203125, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 509.0821533203125, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 500.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.86, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.86, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.9863586425781, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.836, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 154.836, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TAB 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WI EPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.836, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 457.8793640136719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.836, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 353.5724792480469, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 541.5867919921875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 541.5867919921875, + 115.10302734375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 115.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL WITNESS L1ST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 480.2090148925781, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 480.2090148925781, + 363.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 363.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 435.58575439453125, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 435.58575439453125, + 446.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 446.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 439.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 439.4730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED \nBY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 466.727783203125, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 466.727783203125, + 534.4824829101562 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 534.4824829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760618" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc4b8a10607955b05b10db923e6be274d5804bfb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +OTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO EXPERT RROGATORIES + +COMES NOW the Defendant, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel. and hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Expert Interrogatories with the Court propounded by the Plaintiff/Counter-De ndant, Jeffrey Epstein, on October 13, 2017. 6 ha foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +I HEREBY CERTIFY t correct copy of the / to all Counsel on the attached li thi of 1)/W. , 2017. + +> ( S ICI443ir JAC OLA Florida llo.: 169440 A o E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and arcylaw.com unary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@scarcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +--) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester Esquire wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-655-4777 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +A + +CO ' + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 "S C) Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Andrew A. Harris, Esquire aah@FLAppellateLaw.com; jew@FLAppellateLaw.com; Burlington & Rockenbach 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Fax: (561)-721-0465 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +J. Esquire staftefile@pathtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)467-6767 Fax: (954)467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Angela@linkrocIdaw.com; Tanya@linkrockla . 777 Link & Rockenbach, P.A. S Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkro 41 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 4 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Kara@linkrocklaw.com; + +Paul Morris, Esquire paulappeal@gmail.com; paul@paulmorrislaw.com Paul Morris, P.A. 9350 S Dixie Highway, Suite 1450 Miami, FL 33156 Phone: (305)470-1441 Fax: (305)-670-2202 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Go + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +mare®nuriklaw.com 4414ak O \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8133e0b8122709c019d39748b49f933f42625a6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788/EFTA02760788.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760788.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3255, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO EXPERT RROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 497.47467041015625, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 497.47467041015625, + 348.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 348.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.52, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 376.16571044921875, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 376.16571044921875, + 134.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 281.52, + 134.4735107421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760788" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9a343b39feb12ed8334211989e89343e0464fed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH +COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +NOTICE OF SERVING + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein and gives Notice of Serving Agents Request +for Admissions to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]. + +Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to +the following addressees on this 21 day of June, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +FILED +JUL 12 PM 2: 47 +2010 JUN 25 AM 9: 17 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CIRCUIT CIVIL 8 + +BURNETT, P.A. + +Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein + +Espirito Santo Plaza + +1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor + +Miami, Florida 33131 + +305.789.9200 + +305.789.9201 fax B : Esq. rida Bar No. 195677 C \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c9278903209103a9d1ab50e4784858e26db0006 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792/EFTA02760792.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760792.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1733, + "elapsed_seconds": 49.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.774, + 94.581 + ], + [ + 560.802, + 94.581 + ], + [ + 560.802, + 138.10500000000002 + ], + [ + 301.774, + 138.10500000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.11400000000003, + 317.223 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 317.223 + ], + [ + 383.438, + 329.778 + ], + [ + 257.11400000000003, + 329.778 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.132, + 429.38100000000003 + ], + [ + 377.058, + 429.38100000000003 + ], + [ + 377.058, + 441.93600000000004 + ], + [ + 264.132, + 441.93600000000004 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760792" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a6a998d041ea22d2c7204540197e8bdc2f41811 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF W. CHESTER1.0 ., P.A. AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAIN'T'IFF/COUNTER- NT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +W. Chester = Jr., P.A. and W. esecBrewer, Jr., as co-counsel of record for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep Plaintiff'), and pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.505(f), "speciarmove for an Order allowing them to withdraw as - \.7 Plaintiff's co-counsel and in support thereof state: + +cos + +1. Followin e Court's advice at the October 3, 2017, hearing suggesting that Plaintiff should £0 \* 1 'tinsel in the preparation and defense of his claim, Plaintiff retained new trial co the firm of Link & Rockenbach, P.A. and a team of attorneys from the Gunste o al support. + +2. As the Court recognized, a case of this magnitude requires more than what a small firm or II practitioner can provide. + +3. Because Plaintiff will be adequately represented by new counsel, none of the parties to this action will be prejudiced by the withdrawal of W. Chester lIM Jr., P.A. and W. Chester = Jr. + +4. Good cause exists for the granting of this request and Plaintiff has consented to it. See Exhibit A. + +Accordingly, W. Chester = Jr., P.A. and W. Chester 2.1 . respectfully request that this Court enter an Order granting this Motion to Withdraw a() ittg them from any further obligation in this case. + +• + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). + +> (W. CHESTER , P.A. One Clearlake 00 0 Australian Avenue S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 655-4777; (561) 835-8691 [fax] + +By: /s/ 14// Srewer, W. Chester Jr. (FBN 0261858) Primary: w aol.com Secondary: wcblawasst@gmail.com + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Jaffee, Weissing, ██████████ Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
██████████ Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dce@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
██████████ Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
██████████ Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
██████████ Jeffrey Epstein

| + +I hereby consent to the withdrawal of W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr., P.A. and W. Chester Brewer, Jr, as my co-counsel in this case. + +![]()Jeffrey E. Epstein +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Dated: November 3, 2017 + +TOTAL CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e1bf83ff1590e77550214d5de201f01c0c2552d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794/EFTA02760794.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760794.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 9413, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF W. CHESTER1.0 ., P.A. AS CO-COUNSEL \nOF RECORD FOR PLAIN'T'IFF/COUNTER- NT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.625, + 330.0 + ], + [ + 539.5509643554688, + 330.0 + ], + [ + 539.5509643554688, + 361.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 76.625, + 361.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.35799999999998, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 391.1942138671875, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 391.1942138671875, + 320.35748291015625 + ], + [ + 224.35799999999998, + 320.35748291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.59, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.24899999999997, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.24899999999997, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 263.59, + 81.81 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760794" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39cbb5fe63478ec46bfc5193065af86946aca66a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.md @@ -0,0 +1,567 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTIISTEIN individually, J. L.M., individually, individually, and + +Defendant(s). C. 5 + +c + +# MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING ScC4 ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE + +' Pursuant to Florida Statute §90.404( si\*TEdwards, by and through his undersigned counsel, files this Motion in Limine to ss e scope of admissible evidence in the trial of the pending malicious prosecution clsim arid t pond to various assertions by opposing counsel that - - \\,/ Counter-Plaintiff is seeking to impermissibly "turn this civil lawsuit into the prosecution of a bunch of criminal cases" by attempting to introduce the testimony of multiple witnesses about the molestation charges brought against Epstein including the testimony of multiple then-child victims. + +life-representations regarding the Counter-Plaintiffs intentions to introduce evidence of Epstein's extensive pattern of victimization of minor females are accurate. The challenge to those intentions is baseless. + +The foundation of this malicious prosecution case is Epstein's unsupportable allegations that fabricated molestation claims against Epstein in order to knowingly support + +a billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Scott Rothstein. Elements of the malicious prosecution claim are proof of Epstein's lack of probable cause and his malice. It is obviously relevant to the absence of probable cause to support the fabrication claim if Epstein, in fact, committed the acts of molestation he was alleged to have committed. Consequen II relevant and material evidence of Epstein's guilt is admissible. That includes not only a nce elating to the molestation of the three victims represented by M, but lar fact evidence of other child molestations committed by Epstein. See Florida Sta 0.404(2) and Federal Rule of Evidence 415(G). + +In addition, while legal malice is inferred from l tja4ion of a claim in the absence of probable cause, actual malice is relevant to both the pensatory damage claim and the pending claim against Epstein for punitive damag ro f of actual malice — an operation of the defendant's mind — is most often dep circumstantial evidence, and one of the strongest circumstances supporting the e pstein's actual malice toward is the active leadership role Bradley Ed ids played in uncovering the full scope of Epstein's pattern of serial molestations molestations IM' role in the prosecution of the Crime Victims Rights Act challenge to 'n' eetheart Non-Prosecution Agreement. In other words, Epstein was highly moti t sfri silence through his malicious civil action against both to escape exte ive civil liability to dozens of other victims and to escape years of imprisonment if the NPA is set aside. + +Finally, Epstein's counsel has argued that the broad range of the discovery conducted by into matters with no direct tie to clients supports a reasonable + +suspicion that was fabricating claims to support the Ponzi scheme. However, pursuant to Florida Statute §90.404(2) and Federal Rule of Evidence 415(G), evidence of other acts of sexual abuse and child molestation by Epstein against victims other than the three clients represented by was clearly admissible and the discovery into sucliot er criminal conduct was entirely proper. + +Accordingly, though not required under the circumstances o t e pr>secution of this malicious prosecution claim, herby gives notice su lit to F.S. §90.404(2) [copy attached] of his intent to introduce and rely on similar vi ' -nce of other crimes, wrongs, or acts of sexual abuse, child molestation, and solicita ostitution committed by Jeffrey Epstein as detailed in the attached, Plaintiff Jane olice Regarding Evidence of Similar Acts of Sexual Assault, the contents of which are \ ted herein by reference. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a to all Counsel on the attached li day of \vitt' , 2017. rrect copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +k Scar r Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mcp@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +**Motion in Limine** +**Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG** + +### **COUNSEL LIST** + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Andrew A. Harris, Esquire +aah@FLAppellateLaw.com; +jew@FLAppellateLaw.com; +Burlington & Rockenbach +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: (561)-721-0465 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite +301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +**Motion in Limine** +**Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG** + +Paul Morris, Esquire +paulappeal@gmail.com; +paul@paulmorrislaw.com +Paul Morris, P.A. +9350 S Dixie Highway, Suite 1450 +Miami, FL 33156 +Phone: (305)-670-1441 +Fax: (305)-670-2202 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor. + +(c) Character of wittiest—Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in as. 90.608-90.610. + +#### (2) Other crimes, wrongs, or acts.— + +(a) Similar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, including, but not limited to, proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, but it is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity. + +(b) 1. In a criminal case in which the defendant is charged with a crime involving child molestation, evidence of the defendant's commission of other crimes, wrongs, or acts of child molestation is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant + +2. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "child molestation" means conduct proscribed by s. 787.025(2Xc), s. 787.06(3Xg), former s. 787.06(3)00, s. 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10), a. 794.06, former s. 796.03, former a. 796.035, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), s. 847.0146, or a. 985.701(1) when committed against aperson 16 years of age or younger. + +(c) 1. In a criminal case in which the defendant is charged with a sexual offense, evidence of the defendant's commission of other crimes, wrongs, or acts involving a sexual offense is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant + +2. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term offense" means conduct proscribed by s. 787.025(2Xc 787.06(3)(b), (d), (f), or (g), former a. 787.06(3)(h), s. excluding a 794.011(10), a 794.05, former s. 796.03, f 796.035, a. 825.1026(2)(b), s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 985.701(1). + +(d) 1. When the state in a criminal action tffer evidence of other criminal offenses under a , para- graph (10, or paragraph (c), no fewer than days ore trial, the state shall furnish to the defendant o th defendant's counsel a written statement of the acts or o it intends to offer, describing them with the arity required of an indictment or information. No noti uired for evidence of offenses used for impeach t or o buttal. + +2. When the evidence Ited, the court shall, if re- quested, charge the j 'ted purpose for which the evidence is received a d is considered. After the close of the evidence, the jury shall instructed on the limited purpose for which the evid was received and that the defen- dant cannot be convicted for acharge not included in the indictment or info ation. + +(3) Nothing in this section affects the admissibility of evidence under s. 90.610. + +Laws 1976, c. 76-237, f 1. Amended by Laws 1990, c. 90-40, § 2, eft. June 1, 1990; Laws 1993, c. 93-166, § 26, eft. Oct. 1, 1993; Laws 1995, c. 95-147, § 473, eff. July 10, 1996; Laws 2001, c. 2001-221, § 1, eff. July 1, 2001; Laws 2008, c. 2008-172, f 9, eff. Oct 1, 2008; Laws 2011, c. 2011-220, § 2, eft July I, 2011; Laws 2012, c. 2012-97, § 14, eff. July 1, 2012; Laws 2014, c. 2014-160, § 15, eft Oct. 1, 2014. + +#### Historical and Statutory Notes + +#### Amendment Not= + +Laws 1990, c. 90-10, 4 2, eff. June 1, 1990, reenacted subset. (IOW without amendment "for the purpose of incorporating the amendment to section 794.022, Florida Statutes, in a reference thereto". + +The 1990 amendment to this section was not adopted as of court at the time of publication. See the Historical and Statutory Notes to 4 90.101 for adoption of earlier provisions as a rule of court. + +Laws 1993, c. 93-156.4 26, elf. Oct. I, 1993, reenacted subset. (1)(b) of this section for the purpose of incorporating the amendment to 4 794.022 in a reference thereto. + +Laws 1995, c. 95-147. a reviser's bill, eliminated gender-specitle references without making substantive changes in legal effect. + +Laws 2001, c. 2001-221. 4 I, rewrote subset. (2), which formerly read: + +"(2) Other crimes, wrongs, or acts.— "(a) Similar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, + +but it is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity. + +"(b)1. When the state in a criminal action Intends to offer evidence of other criminal offenses under paragraph (a). no fewer than 10 days before trial, the state shall furnish to the accused a written statement of the acts or offenses it intends to offer, describing them with the particularity required of an indictment or information. No notice is required for evidence of offenses used for impeach. ment or on rebuttal. + +"2. When the evidence is admitted, the court shall. if requested, charge the Jury on the limited purpose for which the evidence is received and is to be considered. After,the close of the evidence, the jury shall be Instructed on the limited purpose for which the evidence was received and that the defendant cannot be convicted for acharge not included in the indictment or information." + +The Florida Supreme Court in per minim opinion dated July II, 2002 (826 So.2d 339) Provided in part: + +"Consistent with the committee's recommendations, we adopt chapters 2030-316. sections I and 2; and 2001-132, section 1 to the extent they are procedural. However. after hearing oral argument, and carefully considering the committee's recommendation against adopting chapter 2001-221, section 1, as well as the comment, that were filed, we decline to follow this recommendation and also adopt the amendments to section 90.404(2) to the extent they arc procedural. In the absence of a true 'case and controversy,' we express no opinion on the substance of the amendments or on the challenges to chapter 1-221, section 1, that were raised in these proceedings. The various amendments are effective on the dates they became law." + +Laws 2008. e, 2008-172, 4 9, in subsec. (2Xb)2.. Inserted a reference to 847.0136(5), and made a nonsabstantive language change. + +Laws 2011, c. 2011-220, 4 2, in subset. (2), inserted references to 41787.025(2)(c), 794.011(10). 794.06, 796.03, 796.035, 796.045, 827.071. 847.0145, and 985.7010) par. (b)2., inserted a new par. (c), relating to sexual offenses, and redesignated for par. (c) as par. (d) and inserted a reference to par. (e). + +Laws 2012, c. 2012-97, 4 14, in subsea (2)(b)2. and (2)(02, inserted references to 4 787.06(3)(b), (d). (g), and (h). and deleted references to § 796.045. Laws 2014, e. 2014-160.4 16 in subsec. (2), substituted references to former H787.06(3)0U. 796.03, and 796.036 for references to if 787.06(3)(h). 796.03, and 796.035 in pers. (b)2. and (e)2. + +#### Prior Laws: + +Fla.St.1978, Supp. 4 90.0& + +laws 1971, e. 71-72, 44 1,2. + +Fla.St.1969, 4 90.07. + +Laws 1945, e. 22858, 4 7 + +Comp.Gen.Laws 1227, if 4371,4373. + +Rev.Gen.St..1920, ff 2704,2706. + +GenSt.1906, if 1504, 1506. + +Laws 1901, c. 4966.4 1. + +Rev.S11892, 44 1096, 1097. + +Laws 1861, c. 1096, 4 54. + +Act March 10, 1845, 4 6. + +Act March 15, 1843, 4 25. + +Act Nov. 2i,1828, 4 72. + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNS0N + +Plaintiff, + +Vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. + +Defendant. + +Related Cases: + +08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 + +## PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S NOTICE REGARDING EVIDENCE OF SIMILAR ACTS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT + +Plaintiff, Jane Doe, through undersigned counsel, hereby files this notice pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 415(b), that she intends to offer evidence under the rule of other acts of sexual abuse and child molestation by Epstein at her trial. In compliance with the Rule, this pleading briefly sets out "a summary of the substance of any testimony" that she plans to offer under the Rule. For the convenience of the Court, Jane Doe also provides brief background about the rule and about how the testimony of these other girls fits into the trial. + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-NIARa + +#### BACKGROUND + +#### Federal Rule of Evidence 415 + +Jane Doe provides this notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 415. Congress added Rule 415 into the federal rules in 1994. The rule makes Sidence of other acts of sexual assault or child molestation automatically admissible in any cases (like Jane Doe's) involving allegations of sexual assault by a victim. Congress explained that + +"R]he reform effected by these rules is critical to the protection of the public from rapists and child molesters, and is justified by the distinctive characteristics of the cases to which it applies. In child molestation cases, for example, a history of similar acts tends to be exceptionally probative because it shows an unusual disposition of the defendant -- a sexual or sado-sexual interest in children -- that simply does not exist in ordinary people. Moreover, such cases require reliance on child victims whose credibility can readily be attacked in the absence of substantial corroboration. In such cases, there is a compelling public interest in admitting all significant evidence that will shed some light on the credibility of the charge and any denial by the defense." + +140 CONG. REC. 512990-01,512990 (Sept. 20, 1994) (statement of Sen. Dole). Congress also asked the rule be liberally construed. As the Senate sponsor explained: " ourts should liberally construe the rules so that the defendant's propen well as questions of probability in light of the defendant's past conduct, can b properly assessed." Id. See generally Karp, Evidence of Propensity and Probability in Sex Offense Cases and Other Cases, 70 CHI.M. L. REv. 15 (1994) (statement by principal draftsman of Fed. R. Evid. 413-15 that has been incorporated as part of the legislative history of the rules, see 140 Cong Rec. H8991-92 (Aug. 21, 1994)). + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA, + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 is directly applicable to Jane Doe's case. The Rule provided that "filn a civil case in which a claim for damages or other relief is predicated on a party's alleged commission of conduct constituting an offense of sexual assault or child molestation, evidence of that party's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault or child molestation is admissible and may be considered as provided in Rule 413 and Rule 414 of these rules." Fed. R. Evid. 415(a). Rule 413 defines an "offense of sexual assault" as any "crime under Federal law or the law of a State . . . that involved . . . any conduct proscribed by chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code" — i.e., federal sex offenses against NI 4en. Fed. R. Evid. 413(d). Jane Doe's First Amended Complaint alleges t II \ t committed many such state and federal offenses against her. See FirstCV / n ed Complaint, case no. 9:08-cv-80893- KAM, doc. #38 at 5 (state offens +3, (federal offenses). She also alleges that Epstein committed many such offenses against other then-minor girls. Id. at 2. The testimony described below easily fits within the rule. + +# Requirement of Advance Notice Under Fed. R. Evid. 415(b) + +Fed. R. Evid. 415(b) requires that a "party who intends to offer evidence under this Rule shall disclose the evidence to the party against whom it will be offered, including statements of witnesses or a summary of the substance of any testimony that is expected to be offered, at least fifteen days before the scheduled date of trial or at such later time as the court may allow for good cause." To ensure full compliance with this rule, Jane Doe is filing this detailed notice, more than 15 days in advance of trial. + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA, + +Jane Doe, however, has done far more than simply file this notice to give Epstein full notice of his intent to use such evidence. Indeed, as the Court is aware from earlier filings, Epstein has already received a witness list from Jane Doe with the names of other witnesses he is intending to call. Jane Doe has also given Epstein, both orally and in writing, ample notice that she intends to call the other girls that he abused at trial. In fact, from the onset of this litigation nearly two years ago, Epstein was provided with such notice. (Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Disclosure Pursuant to Fed.RCiv.P. 26 attached hereto as Exhibit A). Epstein is already preparing his motion in limine to object to the introduction of this evidence, as he has sought (and received) permission to file a pleading in excess of twenty-pages on the subject. See Defendant Epstein's Motion in Exceed Page Limitation in Motion in Lirnine to Exclude Similar Fact Evidence, case no. 08-cv-80893-KAM, doc. #167. + +Moreover, Epstein has obtained ample advanced notice of the substance of the testimony of the girls who will testify against him. These girls were the victims in the criminal investigation against him that was prosecuted by the State and Federal government. Epstein has received the Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report, many of their statements to local police and FBI, and a list of approximately 40 underage minor victims was provided to him by the United States Attorney's Office as an addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Through legal counsel, he has received voluminous correspondence, discovery and information from state criminal investigators who investigated his sexual offenses of young girls. Through legal counsel, he has also participated in depositions of a number of these girls, including + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARla + +Jane Doe, Jane Doe's 2-8, CMA, EW, and LM. While settlement discussions are confidential, the fact that Jeffrey Epstein settled the cases against him that were filed by other girls who were not deposed is not secret, and Epstein negotiated those cases on the specific facts of those individual cases. + +In fact, he has apparently paid money to settle the sexual assault claims against him by more than 25 girls. He knows the nature of their allegations. In such I circumstances, no additional notice is required. See Johnson v. Elk Lake School Dist, 2083 F.3d 138, 150 n.6 (3rd Cir. 2002) (finding no need for notice under Fed. R. Evid. 415 (b) where defense counsel had participated in deposition involving the allegation of abuse; "the primary purpose of Rule 415(b)'s disclosure provision [is] preventing a plaintiff from unfairly surprising a defendant at trial with evidence of an alleged past offense of sexual assault). + +# Th i Need far Other Acts Testimony + +Similar fact eviden under F.R.Evidence 415 is extremely relevant and necessary in this cas Plaintiff Jane Doe will testify that she was at defendant Epstein's honl numerous occasions between 2003 and 2005, beginning at a time when s 4 years old. She was brought to his house by another underage minor victim pstein, consistent with Epstein's designed scheme to access underage minors for sex. She was taken up to Epstein's bedroom, and he told her to undress and massage him. Then he rolled over and began masturbating as he also touched Jane Doe's naked breasts, buttocks and vagina. At times Epstein inserted his fingers into her vagina and used a vibrator on Jane Doe's vagina. He and his assistants contacted + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA. + +Jane Doe by telephone (a means of interstate communication) on numerous occasions for her to go "work" at his house or give him a "massage". + +While Epstein has not denied any of these charges directly (he has asserted a 5th amendment right against self-incrimination), he also has not admitted to tbetations and has in fact filed an answer to the complaint denying all of Jane allegations. Case no. 9:08-cv-80893, doc. #131 (answer to complaint). as also raised several affirmative defenses, including "[Jane Doe) consent Jo) and was a willing participant in the acts alleged," id. at 8; "Defendant reasonably believed or was told that Jane Doe had attained the age of 18 years old at the time of the alleged acts," id.; Jane Doe cannot show that a means of interstate communication or transportation was involved in her abuse, id. In addition, Epstein, through counsel, has attacked the credibility of Jane Doe, as character assassination is his primary defense and he is attempting to call into the question the truthfulness of her testimony that she was sexually abused. For example, in deposition, Epstein has shaken his head and laughed and given other non-verb& responses when confronted with questions related to his scheme of accessing underage girls for sex and questions about the ritual that he engaged in with each of his underage victims. His attorneys have implied in deposition that Jane Doe was responsible, rather than Epstein, for this abuse, and that she was just a prostitute (although she has never received money for sex with anyone other than Epstein). He has cast her as a "bad girl" that went voluntarily and could have easily refused any of Epstein's requests, if he indeed made any. In the face of such attacks, + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA, + +Jane Doe needs to establish that Epstein is experienced at accessing and manipulating adolescent and teenage children into engaging in sex acts with him. + +There are also ample other reasons for needing the testimony of other victims of Epstein's attacks. Notable among these is Jane Doe's punitive damages case, which will include proof that Epstein has committed repeated acts of sexual abuse of others similar to Jane Doe. Juries considering punitive damages issu e p inly entitled to consider "the existence and frequency of similar past conduct. 0 Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443, 462 n.28 This is because Supreme Court holdings recognize "that a recidivist may \.\_p ed more severely than a first -Cit offender . . . [because] repeated miscond t o e reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance." BMW of o A erica, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations om t addition, under Rule 404(b), Jane Doe is entitled to offer the evidence to such things as (inter alia) absence of mistake (i.e., absence of a reasonable belief that the girls were 18 years of age or older), common scheme or plan, "modus operandi," psychological coercion, uneven bargaining power, premeditation, knowledge of age, and many other bases. + +# NOTICE OF THE SUBSTANCE OF TESTIMONY TO BE OFFERED + +Jane Doe intends to offer two forms of testimony about other acts of sexual abuse by Epstein: direct and indirect. Direct testimony will come from then-minor girls who were sexually abused by Epstein and from Epstein himself. (Jane Doe intends to ask Epstein at trial whether the girls' testimony about his abuse was accurate; Epstein will then need to either fully confirm directly the accuracy of their testimony or, as he has + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA, + +done during deposition, take the Fifth rather than answer.) This testimony will be direct testimony about Epstein's acts of sexual abuse. Indirect testimony will come from others, such as Alfredo Rodriguez, who will indirectly confirm the accuracy of the girls testimony through testimony. + +While Jane Doe has discovered more than 40 girls that could easily provide similar fact evidence, we have reduced that list of witnesses to 15. Each of the 15 girls listed in this disclosure will testify that they were at Epstein's house while minors between 2002 and 2005 — the same time frame relevant to the abuse alleged in Jane Doe's complaint. They are all of similar age to Jane Doe. Each of the girls will testify to improper sexual contact against them by Epstein in circumstances eerily similar to Jane Doe's — a common "modus operand'," None of the girls had massage experience although each physical encounter with Epstein included a massage. These other girls understand what was meant when Epstein and his conspirators used their common terms, "work" and "massage". None of these girls were prostitutes before meeting Jeffrey Epstein. Each pf the underage girls were paid cash by Epstein in exchange for sexual perforrt5afg. Each was lead into the same home; each was lead into the same bedroo as lead to the same "massage room" within the bedroom. Epstein had similarNecnversations with each of them. Their physical appearance was similar and such that Epstein could not have reasonably believed that they were 18 years of age or older when he was sexually abusing them. + +While this notice provides the substance of the testimony of 15 girls, at trial Jane Doe intends to offer the testimony of only a few girls --- approximately 7 to 10 girls. The + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893•MARR& + +expected length of the testimony of each of these girls is 20 to 30 minutes of direct testimony. As such, the direct testimony can easily be covered in less than one full trial day. + +C.W.' -- When she was 14 years old, she was brought to Epstein's \home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts viith her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +C.L. — When she was approximately 15 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him + +To preserve the privacy of these girls, they will be identified by initials. Epstein is well aware of the full names of these girls, which will be provided to him by Jane Doe's counsel. + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARFtA l + +other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +A.H. — When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence: Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into gotn house for sex/prostitution. + +S.G. — When she was'a ately 14 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a mino/ at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used 4 \ . in her Tence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. n her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA. + +A.D. — When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +V.A. - When she was approximately 13 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on one occasion. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina: Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on Nadia Marcinkova in Epstein's presence. + +N.R. — When she was approximately 17 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on one occasion. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA + +vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. + +J.S. — When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. + +V.Z. -- When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARa + +J.A. -- When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +F.E. -- When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house --topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epl. touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on Nadia Marcinkova in Epstein's presence. Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +M.L. -- When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on one + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA. + +occasion. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes4g ring her t sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to per sex acts on 0 in Epstein's presence. + +M.D. -- When she was approximately 16 years old, she Cas tk•ought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched h east or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was ma to rm sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Ep ' ' presence. + +D.D.--When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein and his co-conspirators used the + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA + +telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +D.N. -- When she was approximately 17 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls, and Epstein and his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact her to entice or induce her into going to his house for sex/prostitution. + +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein -- The final witness Jane Doe intends to call to provide direct evidence of sexual abuse is obviously defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant Epstein knows about the acts of abuse that he inflicted on Jane Doe and the other girls. Jane Doe plans to ask him to admit the truth and accuracy of her testimony — as well as the truth and accuracy of the testimony of the other girls described above. Jane Doe, of course, plans to ask him questions on other subjects as well (such as the tape recorded interview he gave to The Daily News). Jane Doe will also have Epstein authenticate many of the exhibits that she is using (either directly or by taking the Fifth, whichever his choice). For example, Epstein will authenticate the Daily News tape recording, all of the + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA + +discovery provided in state and federal criminal investigations against him, and other materials. + +# Indirect Testimony + +In addition to the direct testimony described above, Jane Doe al i tends to offer what might be called indirect or circumstantial evidence supportin accuracy of her testimony and that of the other girls. It is not clear that R polies to such indirect or circumstantial evidence. Out of an abundance o on, however, Jane Doe hereby gives notice that she will be calling wi A who will corroborate the testimony of the girls. The most important of these At44es are: + +Alfredo Rodriguez — The Court is familiar with Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, having sentenced him for activities associated with this case. His testimony is described at greater length in Jane Doe's Motion for a Writ Ad Testificandum, case no. 9:08-cv-80893, doc. #181. In brief, Mr. Rodriguez saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein's mansion for purported "massages." Mr. Rodriguez was aware that "sex toys" and vibrators were found in Epstein's bed room after the purported massages. ,-- , / \ Rodriguez thoUght this was wrong, given the extreme youth of the girls he saw. In addition, Mr. Rodriguez will testify about "The Holy Grail" — a book he kept containing the names of apparently minor girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. Most (if not all) of the girls listed above are found in the black book. + +was one of Epstein's household employees. Jane Doe intends to call her to confirm Epstein's plan for telephoning the girls before each act of abuse and requesting a purported "massage." Further details of her the substance of + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARa + +the testimony Jane Doe hopes to elicit through her are found in Jane Doe's Civil RICO statement, case no. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM, doc. #38, exh. 1. (= invoked the Fifth Amendment at her deposition.) + +has been described by Epstein as "his sex slave." also participant in some of the sexual activity with Epstein and young girls, as noted above. Further details of her the substance of the testimony Jane Doe hopes to elicit through her are found in Jane Doe's Civil RICO statement, case no. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM, doc. #38, exh. 1. invoked the Fifth Amen dment at her deposition.) + +Detective Recarey and Former Chiet';•lep \ Reiter of the Palm Beach Police Department - These police officers helped conduct the criminal investigation into defendant Epstein's sexual abuse. They will provide testimony about their investigation, and the evidence that they obtained, which will corroborate Jane Doe's and the other girls testimonies. The substance of their testimony is also contained in their depositions in this case and related cases. + +#### 0 Need for Prior Hearing on the Girls Testimony + +Lion to Continue Trial, case no. 08-cv-80893, doc. #185, defendant Epstein see s to suggest that the Court will need to hold some sort of burdensome pretrial hearing before admitting the testimony of these girls. Id. at 5. No such hearing is required. See, e.g., v. Elk Lake School Dist., 283 F.3d 138, 152-53 (3rtl Cir. 2002) (to admit evidence under Rule 415, a trial judge need only decide, as with any other piece of evidence, that " under Rule 104(b) . . . a reasonable jury could find by a + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA + +preponderance of the evidence that the past act was an 'offense of sexual assault' under Rule 413(d)'s definition and that it was committed by the defendant.""). There is ample evidence from which to infer that a reasonable jury could find the statements of the girls to be accurate, including defendant Epstein's invocation of 'the Fifth Amendment rather than answer questions about them, as well as the identical "modus operandi" to which all of the girls will testify and the evidence that was taken from Epstein's home supporting same. + +# CONCLUSION + +Jane Doe has complied with the notification requirements of Rule 415 by providing the notice herein. + +DATED: July 2, 2010 + +Respectfully Submitted, + +AFFE, WEISSING, , FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: brad@pathtojustice.com + +and + +Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jqoldbercieraaowcia.com + +Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcrittonabcIclaw.com + +Isidro Manual isidrociarciaabellsout + +Michael James Pike MPikeabcIclaw.com + +PaulAalbtkatti casseitiliataW.utah.com CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARa + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 2, 2010 I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing. + +# SERVICE LI §c "l + +Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Co (s,rt, tthern District of Florida + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/[REDACTED] + +Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice Regarding Similar Acts of Sexual Assault + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRS + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Defendant + +# PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 26(a)(1)(A-D) + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, by and dardttier undersigned counsel, and files this disclosure pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)( 140c A and states as follows: ?s, + +# A. Witnesses: + +- 1. Jane Doe do Brad 2028 Suite 202 Hollywood, F! 954-41 3 33020 tes + +Ptaintit f - information regarding Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct that is the subject of this action + +- n\ lessi Address unknown at this time \_\_\_ —Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + - 3. Maria Alessi Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + +- 4. Jim Baca Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances +- 5. Janusz Banasiak Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this ion +- 6. Black Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant, Jeffrey Ep +- 7. Keith Blumberg Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's cond +- 8. Brice (last name unknown at this e Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknow i Knowledge of Def 's nduct that is the subject of this action Con li) uct and finances e subject of this action +- 9. Campos Address unknow Telephone nu wn at this time Know dge of endant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 10. Jimmy iAcc ress e epho umber unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances wn at this time lia (last name unknown at this time) Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 12. Maximilia Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + +- 13. Valdson Cotrim Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 14. John Cunningham 353 El Brillo Way West Palm Beach, Florida Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this tion +- 15. Ellen Cunningham 353 El Brillo Way West Palm Beach, Florida Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the j +- 16. Dave (last name unknown at this time) Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time \ t? Knowledge of Defendant's cond t i e subject of this action (pilot for Defendant) +- 17. Ryan Dionne Address unknown at this ti H\ Telephone number unkno is ime Knowledge of QEl dan conduct that is the subject of this action +- 18. Jenn= Address unkn a line l'elephone nu her own at this time Knowl f Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action is action +- 19. Michael iednan Address u own at this time \*elh number unknown at this time r Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action osalie Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 21. Eric Gany Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's finances that is the subject of this action + +- 22. Leslie Groff Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 23. Nicole Hessey Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this ion +- 24. Jennifer (last name unknown at this time) Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the stibj of his action +- 25. Jojo (last name unknown at this time) Address unknown at this time 917-975-4500 Defendant's staff member in NeelAwIt ith knowledge of Defendant's inappropriate conduct with ttrdctage girls .)" 26. Karen (last name unknown at Address unknown at this tim Telephone number unknown axis time Knowledge of conduct that is the subject of this action +- 27. Address unknown at thirtime Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledgerof Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 28. Hewn Ki ress u own at this time one number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action ary Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances +- 30. Bella Klein Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's finances that is the subject of this action + +- 31. L.M. do Brain. & Associates 2028 Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 954-414-8033 Information regarding Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 32. Adam= Lang Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the sub' action +- 33. Michael Liffman Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's condu subject of this action +- 34. Mark Lumberg Address unknown at this time 614-939-6005 Knowledge of DefenddhiSto uct that is the subject of this action +- 35. Cherie Address unknown a Telephone num at this time Knowl endant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 36. (last nam own at this time) Address own at this time 917-856- 8 wledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 37. di + dress unknown at this time elephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + - 38. Ghislaine Maxwell Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + +- 39. Brahalcmana t Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 40. layarukshilMt Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 41. David Mullen Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the sdbj \_ of his action +- 42. Gary Nikolitis Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defend +- 43. David Norr Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknowheth Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 44. Bill Peadon \_ Address unknown-at this time Telephone nu ber u wn at this time Know!dge c befendant's conduct that is the subject of this action pstein's conduct and finances +- 45. Francis Address iirgoZwn at this time ephoKtn wtilmbeger unknown ofpefendatnthsisctime uct that is the subject of this action + ipt, .me Pierre Address unknown at this time 561-704-2747 Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + - 47. Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + +- 48. Governor Bill Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances +- 49. Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this it tion +- 50. Alfredo Rodriguez Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the +- 51. David Rogers Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's cond t • e subject of this action +- 52. /\ Address unknown at this time Telephone number unIcnownettt #Cig 6 Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action is action Address unknown at this time Telephone nu bet ur wn at this time Knowl fendant's conduct that is the subject of this action Address titticriSwn at this time ephonanumber unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action Rueda Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action +- 56. Joanna Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this action + +53. Howard Rubenstein 54. Florena N + +- 57. Santa Fe County Sheriff Solaro Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge concerning Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances +- 58. Alan Stopeck Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is the subject of this a ion +- 59. Mark Tafoya Address unknown at this time Telephone number unknown at this time Knowledge of Defendant's conduct that is thepdbj +- 60. Brent Tindall Address unknown at this time 917-601-4143 Knowledge of Defendant's cond t (s 'h e subject of this action +- 61. Larry Visosky Address unknown at this time Telephone number unlmowritth1 time Knowledge of Defefidant's conduct that is the subject of this action is action +- 62. Lelie Wexner Address unknow iTe Telephone nu wn at this time ICnowl ge cp cerning Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and finances +- 63. All girl tBed in the attachment to the non-prosecution agreement that De endan J ey Epstein, has entered with the United States and all other ' 'lady- uated girls, whose identities Plaintiff will attempt to determine (and gard to whom Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, has invoked the Fifth drnent rather than disclose their identities). All other then-minor girls (those not listed in the attachment to the nonprosecution agreement), whose identities Plaintiff will attempt to determine, with whom Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, has engaged in sexual activity. +- 65. FBI agents, whose names, addresses and telephone numbers are unknown at this time, that investigated the criminal case(s) and the allegations made against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. + +- 66. Palm Beach Police officers, whose names, addresses and telephone numbers are unknown at this time that investigated Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for criminal conduct. +- 67. State Prosecutors, whose names, addresses and telephone numbers are unknown at this time, including but not limited to: + - (a) ASA Lanna Leigh Belohlavek State Attorney's Office 15th Judicial Circuit + - (b) ASA Weiss State Attorney's Office 15th Judicial Circuit +- 68. United States' Prosecutors, whose names, addresses Cthlephone numbers are unknown at this time, including but not limi + - (a) AUSA Ann C. Villafafia. United States Attorney's Office\ 500 South Australian Ave 561-820-8711 West Palm Beach, Rod,1 +- 69. All accountants, boo Sic , b en, financial institutions, representatives, real estate advisors, fin ers, employees, governmental persons or entities, and unknown oth have discoverable information related to Defendant, Jeffrey EpsteitjChet and finances. +- 70. Any and all ji ue s and/or entities identified through discovery having any Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's charitable, political or other donations pest. +- 71. all persons and/or entities identified through discovery that were sued in p st by the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and/or by any company or entity that Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, owned and/or managed Reporters and other media persons, whose names, addresses and telephone numbers are unknown at this time. 73 All other witnesses learned through discovery process. + +# B. Exhibits: + +- I. Palm Beach Police Department report and documents contained within Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, criminal files + +- 2. All documents and pleadings from all criminal and civil cases filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein or his corporations and against Jeffery Epstein or his corporations + +# C. Computation of dimmest + +- 1. Physical, psychological and psychiatric injuries and resulting medical expenses precise amount yet to be computed, but not less than \$15,000.00. +- 2. Past, present and future pain and suffering, mental anguish, umiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasi rivacy precise amount yet to be computed, but not less than \$10,000 +- 3. Past and future lost wages and past and future loss of e ity and actual earnings — precise amounts yet to be computed, but n \$1,000,000.00. +- 4. Punitive Damages to be based upon all releva fac eluding the egregious and criminal nature of Defendant, Jeffrey ter conduct and the need for a large award to punish and deter conduct i i o i e vast wealth of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in an amount not less ,000.00 + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true o copy of the above and foregoing Disclosure Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a been provided by United States mail and facsimile transmission to all counsel entified below this 19th day of November, 2008, and that no copy has been filed + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike, Esqu Burman, Critto t & Coleman, LLP 515 North lagle ve Suite West ch, Florida 33401 + +k Alan Goldberger, Esquire A erburty, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 jagesqg bellsouth.net + +Michael R. Tein, Esquire Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 tein@lewistein.com + +By: + +Respectfully Submitted, + +THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD ASSOCIATES, LLC + +Brad , EsquirC Attorney for Plai • Florida Bar N 2028 Harris Suite 2 Holl Tel da 33020 954-414-8033 954-9244530 be @bradedwards I aw.cont + +Pall G. Cassell tomey for Plaintiff Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassel fp@ law .utalLedu \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee2ec28e5d9cbcd490afc1b129ab3afc3ae29d03 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798/EFTA02760798.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1958 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760798.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 37, + "chars": 59423, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.51, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 68.641 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 68.641 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 111.612548828125 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 111.612548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING ScC4 ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 358.91799999999995 + ], + [ + 514.048828125, + 358.91799999999995 + ], + [ + 514.048828125, + 374.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 374.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(2) Other crimes, wrongs, or acts.\u2014", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.364000000000004, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 214.27880859375, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 214.27880859375, + 128.233642578125 + ], + [ + 59.364000000000004, + 128.233642578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Historical and Statutory Notes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 514.3989868164062, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 514.3989868164062, + 72.1412353515625 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 72.1412353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amendment Not=", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 384.2519836425781, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 384.2519836425781, + 80.2685546875 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 80.2685546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Prior Laws:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.672, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.069091796875, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.069091796875, + 527.8352661132812 + ], + [ + 309.672, + 527.8352661132812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 409.24560546875, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 409.24560546875, + 114.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 114.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S NOTICE REGARDING \nEVIDENCE OF SIMILAR ACTS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 456.5576477050781, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 456.5576477050781, + 418.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 418.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 356.0962829589844, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 356.0962829589844, + 137.947021484375 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 137.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Federal Rule of Evidence 415", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 393.3997497558594, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 393.3997497558594, + 164.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 164.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Requirement of Advance Notice Under Fed. R. Evid. 415(b)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 472.62408447265625, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 472.62408447265625, + 510.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 510.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Th i Need far Other Acts Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 408.74749755859375, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 408.74749755859375, + 456.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 456.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF THE SUBSTANCE OF TESTIMONY TO BE OFFERED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 488.4649658203125, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 488.4649658203125, + 563.3035125732422 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 563.3035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Indirect Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 363.74749755859375, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 363.74749755859375, + 190.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 190.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "0\nNeed for Prior Hearing on the Girls Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 447.765869140625, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 447.765869140625, + 545.6835174560547 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 545.6835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 351.0942077636719, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 351.0942077636719, + 323.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 323.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 136.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 387.58221435546875, + 136.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 387.58221435546875, + 150.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 150.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LI \u00a7c \"l", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.832, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 357.302001953125, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 357.302001953125, + 349.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 266.832, + 349.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 390.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 416.47393798828125, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 416.47393798828125, + 115.353515625 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 115.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S DISCLOSURE \nPURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 26(a)(1)(A-D)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 430.0672912597656, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 430.0672912597656, + 327.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 327.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Exhibits:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 643.1400000000001 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 643.1400000000001 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 658.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 658.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Computation of dimmest", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.45999908447266, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 143.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 85.45999908447266, + 143.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 1313 + ], + [ + "Line", + 103 + ], + [ + "Text", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760798" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69ac9719d2d424bf9672126858619ac1cbb191d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +## c ORDER GRANTING/DEW4Ne T' P 'TIES' JOINT MOTION TO DISPENSE WITH MEDIATION + +THIS CAUSE came before the Cou NNo ember \* 8, 2017, during the Court's UMC calendar upon the parties' Joint MA ispense With Mediation. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and having beeX4ed of the agreement of the parties, hereby, + +ORDERED AND ADJUSGE6 that the Motion is GRANTED/ sdti. . --The—Gee-Ftfa rrftlir" +0 + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, P day of November, 2017. + +> THE CIRCUIT E NALD W. HAFELE + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and.. JIM. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on the Parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss With Mediation Page 2 + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Ches

| | + +Scott J. Link + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Primary: [Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) + +Primary: [Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) + +Primary: [Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) + +Secondary: [Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) + +Secondary: [Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) + +Secondary: [Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) + +Secondary: [Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) + +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db3b1a9a3c9653d6c89f5c1517265238a078f240 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835/EFTA02760835.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760835.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6448, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "c \nORDER GRANTING/DEW4Ne T' P 'TIES' JOINT \nMOTION TO DISPENSE WITH MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 345.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 454.56243896484375, + 345.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 454.56243896484375, + 383.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 383.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 348.92669677734375, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 348.92669677734375, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 155.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 306 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760835" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9bb2f8581bb1289e7572617e25ae2ec09dcd6e5b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.md @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +## RESPONSE TO REOUEST TO PRODUCE REGARDING EXPERTS + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Ed 7 ds, by and through the undersigned attorney and pursuant to Rule 1.350, Florida Rules of dure, hereby responds to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Request to uce dated October 13, 2017 as follows: + +- 1. Copies of any and all b ittons of your expert witnesses taken in any other action that are in your possession (inciklirigiyour attorneys). + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- 2. Any and all reports rendered by experts applicable to any and all issues in this case. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +3:T —All correspondence between counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff and all experts in this matter, whether electronic or otherwise. + +Response: See responsive documents -numbered /JANSEN-000001 through /JANSEN-000280. + +- 4. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, paper, letter, bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, survey, plat or other document or tangible + +evidence including electronically stored evidence in tangible form, furnished or made available to your expert in connection with this matter. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +5. Each and every article, treatise, book, study, chapter, page, r ijtter, bill, invoice, photograph, videotape, report, records, note, diagram, survey, pla t r document, or tangible evidence, including electronically stored evidence in tangibl fotm ther similar source of information considered or reviewed by your expert or which your expert relied in evaluating, investigating or formulating his or her opinio, ection with this matter. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +6. Any other information review c\Iexpert in connection with this case. + +Response: Previously disci + +7. All documents or tangible s of any nature pertaining to the following: - + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- a. The scir of your employment of expert witnesses in this case and the (Its , pensation for such service. e general litigation experience of your expert witnesses in this case, including the percentage of work performed for plaintiffs and defendants. +- c. The identity of legal actions in which each of your expert witnesses rendered opinions or evaluations during the last ten (10) years. + +- d. The identity of other cases in which each of your expert witnesses in this case have testified by deposition or at trial during the last ten (10) years. +- e. An approximation of the portion of the expert's involvement an expert witness, which may be based upon the number of hours, pe f hours, or percentage of earned income derived from serving witness. +- 8. Copies of any and all bills, invoices, records, memt anda, ecks, check stubs, receipts, 1099's, tax records or any other form of financial i compensation paid by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff and expert witnesses for the last ten (10) years. anon evidencing payment or or services provided by your + +Response: Previously disclosed.\ + +- 9. Your expert witnesses' most current curriculum vitae or resume. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- 10. Each and every ciocurnent created by your experts in connection with this matter. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- 11. Alj'aicles, books, papers, manuals, studies or similar documents both formal and informal, Rai % your, experts or to which your experts contributed. + +se: All identified in prior disclosure. + +- 12. Any opinions which were revised or modified. + +Response: See responsive documents -numbered /JANSEN-000001 through JANSEN-000280. + +- 13. A fee schedule for each and every expert. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- 14. All expert reports of the same expert(s) in your possession or that ofyokattomeys for any other case within the last ten (10) years. + +Response: Previously disclosed. + +- 15. Copies of all orders pertaining to your experts any based on motions to limit or bar their opinions or work including but not lit er. ose orders related to Frye or Daubert. + +Response: Not applicable. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY th ( Se 1,correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attach 't day of , 2017. + +O + +a a + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Andrew A. Harris, Esquire +aah@FLAppellateLaw.com; +jew@FLAppellateLaw.com; +Burlington & Rockenbach +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: (561)-721-0465 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite +301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +«style» + +Case No.: «Court\_court\_case\_no» + +Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +Paul Morris, Esquire +paulappeal@gmail.com; +paul@paulmorrislaw.com +Paul Morris, P.A. +9350 S Dixie Highway, Suite 1450 +Miami, FL 33156 +Phone: (305)-670-1441 +Fax: (305)-670-2202 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66d2726eaeae0be535dc4fb6919addc3920e0af8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838/EFTA02760838.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760838.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7224, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO REOUEST TO PRODUCE REGARDING EXPERTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 490.42816162109375, + 334.935 + ], + [ + 490.42816162109375, + 350.35302734375 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 350.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 143.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760838" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e8b5c8fff116ba285323c6a55f072a6bf127345 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.md @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED ON DUCES TECUM + +S SA + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that o Law Offices of Pottinger LLC, 42 N 1 Sd ews v Avenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida December 1, 2017. at 9:30 a.m. at the 33301-3268, Plaintiff/Counter-Defe ey Epstein will take the videotaped deposition by oral examination for purposes and for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of: + +BERNARD J. JANSEN + +The videotaped d ition will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer autho cze . d r, o administer oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a s neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who is either a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +To the extent not already produced, the witness shall produce by November 22. 2017 those documents identified in the Subpoena Duces Tecum attached. + +Court reporting services shall be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Hwy., Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attomes4-ilted on the Service List below on November 14, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes oul ard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach All 401 (561) 727-3600. 27-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/Sc + +Sc9MJ. ln(FBN 602991) d Rockenbach (FBN 44903) . Many (FBN 26680) ry: Scott@ilinkrocklaw.com mary: Kara@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaelinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO SA + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR Vie D DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +ACce TO: Dr. Bernard J. Jansen do Jack Scarola ( S \ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Ba ley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes B West Palm Beach, FL 3 9 + +YOU ARE COM to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions on Friday, December 1, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. at the Law Offices of Pottinger LLC, 425 N. &lt; ev,1/2venue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268, for the taking of your videotaped on in this action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +subpoenaed to appear by the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +You are further directed to produce to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's counsel by November 22. 2017, the documents identified in the attached Exhibit "A," to the extent not already produced. + +Dated: November 14, 2017. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 444) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 2668Qf + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Anaela(thlinkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina(a)linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tr. ci)linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: I inlcrocklaw.com + +Secon inkrocklaw.com + +Trial Jeffj or Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +If you are a person with a disability wh salty accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to yo to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555, Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +Copies provided to: + +# SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searc , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Pa each Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsxOsearcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsialendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### EXHIBIT A + +## DEFINITIONS + +1. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, tex messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversatiAlAlidialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. consultations, art + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper do or representations, tangible items, and electronically s ation, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consisten li Ida c Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if 1 t rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the ow' items which arc in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: hic or auditory records + +- a. All writt or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited : nsmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intraoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + ++0 + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet dis c , tte tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi e messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, than ents, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; +- c. Electronically stored information , mechanical and electrical records or representations o including, but not limited to: all electronic communicat messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, ne rk lo , Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presen o , database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, ob e files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design 0 video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP'; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all r part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether o e draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Pleas D t "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communicat' n ommunications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of 'n h pplication in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein m t aI person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public comp priv company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, pro , tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental bod board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an rP• erson shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the preser d fo er directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, erection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + ++he terms "you" or "your" mean Dr. Bernard J. Jansen and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, + +evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. , Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E. . any other clients represented by J. present. against Jeffrey Epstein from r 1, 2008 to the + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer toC Group 11/ graphic file for storing bit-mapped images. tiw + +10. Where appropriate: + +1. informs( your po e to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all ments which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in on, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. use of the singular inch the past tense includes the words "and" an the words "all" the word "inc use of the s e siS,al, and vice versa; ese tense; tr" th conjunctive and disjunctive; can "any and all"; ans "including without limitation"; and ncludes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +## ESI Instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ES! shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ES! document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ES! shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media. The production of ESI as described he be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). c e ction Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity- the te of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you at any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 i ntify such ES! document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis ' .....e eel' g to produce the ES! document, including, for example, any limitations on acc ely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, which the ESI document used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in + +6. TI . ES! produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pro. f IFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load ) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("LS7"); (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ropn, which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File' or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF i les were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF • : + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes sha a med so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded fit s ) of be extracted as separate + - (3) author comme s I main or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, w nd other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) to otes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent E3 jl.a, eign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be +- b. D compliant. nitizati n. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF t is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments O unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Micro readshect files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet datp i produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, row information unhidden and expanded. +- f. Right to Request Native Format 'reserve the right to demand production in Native Format< lc"NSfi, produced by you as a TIFF image file. hects and other + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Your current curriculum vitae. )e +- 2. My reports prepared b u r at your direction, relating to your services or participation in this Lawsuit and your is of the Other Lawsuits. +- 3. Copies of a no aide by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusiopA i this Lawsuit and your analysis of the Other Lawsuits, whether you relied on those +- 4. tions between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or ons in this Lawsuit, as well as your analysis of the Other Lawsuits. +- 5. My photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 6. My deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 7. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 8. My statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 10. My documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not ypu actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this Lawsuit. +- 11. All literature and/or documents that you considered relevant to yo t in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your o 0 ' • conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 12. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate a fact r opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, inv r opinions. +- 13. Copies of any articles, books, papers or other publ by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subjec this Lawsuit. +- 14. My and all materials considered, consu by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in th• u including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or govern age y, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party engagin ices, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 15. My and all models or formulation and exp of this Lawsuit. ve tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the ur opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter +- 16. A conv of aav ret ef agreement or otheritrant between you and James guns I for James that sets forth the terms of your is matter, including, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this +- 17. of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects pa ent or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit or any of the Other Lawsuits. +- 18. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. +- 19. A list of all other expert witness services for James clients represented by James in the last ten years. or any +- 20. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +- 21. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 22. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the scope of discovery in litigation. +- 23. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert testimony, and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 24. All complaints filed against you with the Florida Bar, as well as all co icati ns to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating to any discip it • troceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, or any committee of .! " Bar. + +C + +iS 4/) 9 + +?S' + +r + +C + +— + +r ic S II PIIIr + +'....) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..214cfbc555d50910af40beb2e673ba77d8ce8cfd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844/EFTA02760844.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,835 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760844.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 27216, + "elapsed_seconds": 12.31, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED \nON DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 494.2691955566406, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 494.2691955566406, + 363.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 363.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR Vie D DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 481.8520202636719, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 481.8520202636719, + 348.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 348.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 538.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 538.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.4330749511719, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.03717041015625, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 355.37847900390625, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 358.3641357421875, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ESI Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.8663635253906, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 414.21630859375, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760844" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67e5276ccd08e7d26f199bd5a4b928b23eaf7732 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.md @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800VOCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO .JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL + +'k-Counter-Plaintiff J. "), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition tbPlaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Supplemental Motion for Continuan .t o .) 'and as grounds thereof states as follows: + +- ( +- 1. On November 1 , 201 , pstein filed his Supplemental Motion for Continuance of —,/ Trial, which included the following incorrect assertions: + - a. (1) changed his damages claim "by adding reputational damages" on Nb 5, 2017, when he disclosed expert witness Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D.; ÷. b. Seventh Amended Witness List disclosed for the first time that certain fact witnesses would also provide expert witness testimony, namely the attorneys who represented Epstein's child victims in sexual abuse litigation; and + - c. (3) Seventh Amended Witness List was the first time William Berger, Esq. was disclosed. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion for Continuance of Trial + +## Reputational Damages + +2. As to the first issue, has pled damages to his reputation in every malicious prosecution counterclaim that he has filed in this case, beginning in 2011: + +- a. (1) Amended Counterclaim at ¶ 12, filed October 4, 2011; +- b. +- c. (3) Third Amended Counterclaim at ¶ 33, filed May 21 +- d. (4) Fourth Amended Counterclaim at ¶ 33, filed Jan 013. +- (2) Second Amended Counterclaim at ¶ 33, filed November 2 9' ,S 1 ; a + +3. Epstein has therefore been aware of the repytta t , . amages claim for six years, and any claim to the contrary is wholly without merit A is r, ied by the pleadings in this case. + +# Expert Wit Dixilosure + +4. As to the second and third 's u pstein has been on notice since 2010 that the attorneys who represented his chi is were expected to provide both fact and opinion testimony in this case. Specifi y, ecember 2, 2010, served his Answers to First Set of Expert Witness Int tories, in which he stated as follows in response to Epstein's request for the disclosure of all experts "whom you expect to call as an Expert witness at trial": + +has not retained any experts at this time. However, it is expected that some or all of the attorneys who have prosecuted civil claims against Jeffrey E stein arising out of his abuse of children will be called to testify on behalf of and may express opinions regarding the services rendered by on behalf of his clients. + +Subsequent witness lists have consistently and repeatedly conveyed the same intent to rely upon the fact and opinion testimony of the attorneys who were simultaneously prosecuting child molestation claims jointly with against Epstein. Despite these disclosures, there was never a request to depose any of these attorneys at any + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion for Continuance of Trial + +time prior to November 13, 2017. That is, Epstein has waited over 7 years until less than 2 weeks before the close of discovery and only approximately 3 weeks before trial to seek discovery of these witnesses. + +5. Moreover, these disclosures cover William Berger, Esquire, w 2012 was disclosed as an attorney who provided substantive services in the prosecuti f sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Specifically, a Answers Third Set of Interrogatories, which were served on January 6, 2012, included \_following question and answer: 1 )9 + +#32: Identify all attorneys who worked on the client cases against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, including, but not limit to, the attorneys former) at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler; the attorneys at Jaffee, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL; outside attorneys and referring attorneys + +A: Paul C I; \_att Weissing, Steve Jaffee and Bill Berger rendered substantive servicertn t prosecution of claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Adler was in attenderEe jai depositions but was not an active \ participant. + +was, in fact, specifically questioned about William Berger when deposed for the first-time more than seven years ago in 2010. + +Exhibit A e entirety of Epstein's witness deposition efforts is attached as + +6. was also questioned about William Berger, Esq. at his March 23, 2010 deposition, more than seven (7) years ago. See Deposition Transcript at pages 42 and 118. + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental +Motion for Continuance of Trial + +**Conclusion** + +For the foregoing reasons, Counter-Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny Epstein's Motion for Continuance of Trial and Supplement thereto and allow this eight (8) year old case to finally proceed to trial. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental +Motion for Continuance of Trial + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental +Motion for Continuance of Trial + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +# EXHIBIT A HISTORY OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION CONDUCT + +| | | | TAKEN | +|-------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------| +| DATE OF NOTICE | WITNESS(ES) | DATE DEPO SCHEDULED | | +| 4/5/10 | Scott Rothstein (do Marc S. Murkin, Esq.) | 4/15/10 | | +| 4/6/10 | Michael Fisten & Richard Fandry | 4/19/10 | | +| 4/16/10 | Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for | | | +| | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA | 5/19/10 | Cancelled 1/19/11 | +| 12/6/10 | Gary | (corrected) (Apparently misdated and | | +| | should be 1/6/11) | 1/26/11 1/19/11 | Cancelled 1/24/11 | +| 12/16/10 | Mike Fisten | | | +| 12/16/10 | Adler | 1/20/1 I | Cancelled 1/19/11 | +| 12/16/10 | Ken Jenne | y25/11 | Cancelled 1/21/11 | +| 12/16/10 | Scott Rothstein | -/ ,. ' `'(/21/11 | | +| 12/16/10 | Gary | 1/26/11 | Cancelled 1/24/II | +| 12/16/10 | Debra | 1/27/11 | Cancelled 1/24/11 | +| 12/16/10 | A.J. Discala | | | +| | | 1/28/11 LS | YES (on 5/25/11) | +| 12/16/10 | Thane Richie | N--- | | +| | | 1/31/11 | Cancelled 1/28/11 | +| 12/16/10 | Michael Legam | 2/1/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 12/16/10 | Kretschmar | 2/4/11 | YES (on 2/11/11) | +| 1/4/11 | Herbert Stettptistee for Bankruptcy for RRA | 1/20/11 | Cancelled 1/19/11 | +| 1/6/11 | Mike Fisten (corrected) | 1/19/11 | | +| 1/6/11 | Adler (corrected) | 1/20/11 | Cancelled 1/19/11 | +| 1/6/11 | Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/6/11 | Scott Rothstein (corrected) | 1/21/11 | YES 6/14/12 | +| 1/6/11 | Ken Jenne (corrected) | 1/25/11 | Cancelled 1/21/11 | +| 1/6/11 | Debra (corrected) | 1/27/11 | Cancelled 1/24/11 | +| 1/11/11 | Kretschmaallotice) | 2/11/11 | YES | +| 1/19/11 | Cancellation of.. | Adler 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/19/11 | Cancellation of Herb Stettin | | Cancelled | + +| 1 /21 /1 1 | Cancellation of Ken Jenne | 1/25/11 | Cancelled | +|------------|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------| +| 1/24/11 | Cancellation of Debr | 1/27/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/24/11 | Cancellation of Gary | 1/26/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/28/11 | Cancellation of Michael Legamaro | 2/1/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/28/11 | Cancellation of Thane Ritchie | 1/31/11 | Cancelled | +| 2/2/11 | A.J. Discala | 2/22/11 | YES (on | +| 2/8/11 | Tane Ritchie | 2/22/11 | Cancelled | +| 2/23/11 | A.J. Discala (Re-Notice) | 2/23/11 | YES (on | +| 2/23/11 | Michael Legamaro | 3/11/11 | YES | +| 3/4/11 | R/C Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for | | | +| 3/8/11 | A.J. Discala (Re-Notice) | 3/10711 | YES (on | +| 4/6/11 | Adler | 4/20/11 | YES | +| 4/7/11 | AJ Discala (Re-Notice) | 5/12/11 | YES (on | +| 4/13/11 | Al Discala Re-Notice | 5/25/11 | YES | +| 5/16/11 | Cara | 6/10/11 | Cancelled | +| 6/6/11 | Cara Re-Notice | 6/21/11 | Cancelled | +| 6/6/11 | Cancellation of Cara | 6/10/11 | Cancelled | +| 10/24/12 | | 11/13/12 | YES | +| 4/5/13 | | 5/15/13 | YES | +| 4/23/13 | (Amended) | 5/15/13 | YES | +| 8/6/13 | I I | 10/10/13 | YES | +| 8/2/17 | Attorney Coleman requested deposition dates for 4 | | | +| 8/2/17 | Mr. | ' attorney responded with dates | | +| 8/3/17 | Ms. Coleman asked Mr. | to confirm that | | +| 8/3/17 | Mr. | confirmed that he would accept | | +| 8/9/17 | Mr. | . Coleman specify | | + +| 8/9/17 | Ms. Coleman selected 7 dates between Oct. 10 and | | +|----------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| 8/14/17 | Mr. | counsel provided 3 dates 10/5, 10/11 | +| 8/14/17 | Ms. Coleman instructed Mr. | counsel to | +| 8/16/17 | Mr. | confirmed that he would make his | +| 8/29/17 | | 9/12/17 YES | +| 8/29/17 | I | 11/10/17 YES | +| 8/31/17 | Re-Notic' | 10/12/17 YES | +| | | unilaterially C ll?ci | +| 10/12/17 | EW (in prison) | YES | + +Epstein's counsel noticed 9/26/17, they unilaterally cancelled V. 10/11/17 and never set anyone for'l date EW was deposed. I 10/5/17 and EW (in prison) for 10/12. On berts' deposition. Epstein's counsel never used The only date they made use of was 10/12/17, the + +No / other depositioits were attempted to be set until a request was made on 11/3/17 to depose Dr. Jarnei Jansen and a request was made on 11/3/17 to depose 8 attorneys. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ef93eb5566a300db64d9ccce4fba719ebe7b512 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859/EFTA02760859.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,484 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760859.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 16370, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 541.1583862304688, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 541.1583862304688, + 115.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 115.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO .JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION \nFOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 538.0848388671875, + 334.108 + ], + [ + 538.0848388671875, + 363.863037109375 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 363.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Reputational Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 369.2672119140625, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 369.2672119140625, + 134.60302734375 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 134.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Expert Wit Dixilosure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.232, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 376.9554443359375, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 376.9554443359375, + 383.60302734375 + ], + [ + 236.232, + 383.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 134.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A \nHISTORY OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION CONDUCT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 104.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 104.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760859" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..caf6c9308229997ef4c7c5ba95230248904088c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.md @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## CP S DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMERt TO PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- Form. +- 1. On November 9, 20Y7 Ards filed his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict +- 2. hereby adds the following additional proposed jury instruction to that pleading: + +FederafRble oPEvidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involAng all claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestatkin, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +As a consequence of these rovisions in both federal and state law, proper pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein was not limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein against the three clients represented by . The law expressly allowed Mr. to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexual assault or child molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 2 of 3 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14Th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 3 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) + +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com + +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-655-4777 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; + +smahoney@agwpa.com + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; + +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire + +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; + +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com + +Fred Haddad, P.A. + +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +Phone: (954)-467-6767 + +Fax: (954)-467-3599 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f12327d20ce37204141e59d63b41b73c2ce1f5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868/EFTA02760868.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760868.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4096, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CP S\nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMERt TO PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.8, + 292.07061767578125 + ], + [ + 522.3916625976562, + 292.07061767578125 + ], + [ + 522.3916625976562, + 337.60302734375 + ], + [ + 91.8, + 337.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 127 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760868" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d979bbb0efbd7cce0fdd01587b36d6a47725551 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, L M, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL, SETTING HEARINGS AND RESET-TING CASE FOR SPECIAL SET TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Motion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines or, in the Alternative, Bifurcation of Trial, and the court, having heard arguments of counsel, having reviewed the motion and the attachments as well as the court file, and being fully advised of the premises it is: + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to continue is granted thereby mooting the remaining motions. + +Under the circumstances of this unusual and relatively complex case, the court finds that there are simply too many significant, lengthy motions that are pending and need to be heard prior to December 5, 2017, the date that the trial was originally scheduled to commence. The court and counsel have tried to schedule these extensive and numerous pretrial motions but due to the busy schedules of all concerned, trying to hear all of the motions between now (November 14, 2017) and prior to December 5, 2017, would cause undue strain on the part of the court and counsel. At this late juncture, not knowing how the court will rule on critical issues would require counsel to try to strategize and plan their respective cases under extreme uncertainty and duress. N + +To stem this overriding concern but also taking into account the age of the case (the case's extensive appellate history is well known to the parties and will not be repeated here), the court specially sets this case Number 1 for the ten (10) day period commencing March 13, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom IOC. In the interim, lead counsel of record shall prepare a list of the parties' respective motions and the agreed sequence of the motions to be heard as well as the total anticipated time for argument (motion, response and rebuttal only). As to the written motions, only the motion and a response will be permitted. No reply briefs will be allowed + +absent court order. This schedule shall be prepared and presented to the court no later than noon on November 17, 2017 as the court will be on vacation during Thanksgiving week. In addition to the November 29, 2017 date already provided (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. and allowing one hour and fifteen minutes for lunch), the court is opening up December 5, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.) and December 7, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — noon) so that all pending motions (only) can be heard. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14th day of November, 2017. + +![](_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +## Copies furnished to: + +- Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) James (brad@pathtojustice 1.7 Fred Haddad (haddadfm@aol.com) 17 John Scarola (mep@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN, JR (JACKER +- KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH (KBROCK@FLACIVILLAW COM) F7 Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) F7 Matthew D Weissing (mptt@pathtojustice.com) +- **Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@tlappellatelaw.com)** +- **PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COM)** +- service©jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrial.com) +- Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) +- William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- William Chester , Jr. (wcblaw@aol.com) 17 William B.. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) +- John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) +- Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com) +- Angela Many (angela@linkrocklaw.com) + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com)** + +▪ **John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com)** + +**Fred Haddad (Dee@fredhaddadlaw.com)** + +**James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com)** + +**Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com)** + +**tr, NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**fr, JaymeMi Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) A ,** + +**Fred Haddad (fredhaddad@fredhaddadlaw.com) IZ7** + +**Andrew A Harris arh@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**• Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com)** + +**• John R. Beranek aberanek@ausley.com)** + +**F7 (staff.efile@pathtojustice.c** + +**)** ▪ **Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com** + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (kara@linkrocklaw.com)** + +**• NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com)** + +**• Angela M. Many (tanya@linkrocklaw.com** + +**Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.** + +**• Kara Berard Rockenbach (troy@lInkrocklaw.com)** + +**• W ChesterM Jr (wcblawasst@gmall.com)** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f72d9a395c9d7c749dc4289ad092d1e067b1bc85 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/EFTA02760871.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4755, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.33, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.09000396728516, + 76.911 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 76.911 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 104.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 123.09000396728516, + 104.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, \nMOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL, SETTING HEARINGS AND RESET-TING \nCASE FOR SPECIAL SET TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 295.239 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 295.239 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 338.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 338.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 173.647705078125, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 173.647705078125, + 325.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 325.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760871" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31a8f4578b8034adedf7ee741ef9c432f4c2dfba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760871/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5cb3fd3ac0e701b8beee37160fbd0b8bc1bd0fb12bc5b084cdb8acbb06f20a53 +size 13604 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..175c737ce496ea5032889a1d42f018505be7a0a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.md @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/ +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S ██████████ DED EXHIBIT LIST** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, files the following Objections to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ██████████ J. Edwards' Amended Exhibit List dated November 9, 2017: + +**LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:** + +- 1 – All Objections +- 2 – All Objections except Authenticity +- 3 - Relevance +- 4 – Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5 – Privileged +- 6 - Opinion +- 7 – Hearsay +- 8 – Authenticity +- 9 – Other (please identify basis of objection) +- 10 – Completeness +- 11 – Overbroad +- 12 – Not provided to Counsel for Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation +- 13 – Not a proper exhibit +- 14 – Trade secrets/Confidential + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | +| 11. | [REDACTED] phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed | 3, 4, 8 | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 24. | Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 25. | Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a plaintiff or defendant | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13. This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and | | +| | | cars at boats) | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein | | +| | | 3 „ | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | | +| | | 3 , • , 8, 10 | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Off | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Vic ' | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident | | +| 49. | All reports and documentation gen ji aim Beach | | +| | Police Department related to Je sto n | | +| | All Witness Statements gene b m Beach Police | | +| | Department relating to Je y | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of stein's aircraft and | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for fl is ken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, II, 12 | +| 53. | Letter from Je to Alberto Pinto regarding | | +| | house isla d r t | | +| 54. | Jeffrey ank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 55. | Jere' s 's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 56. | ails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, | | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | +| 59. | Massage Table | 3, 4, 12 (document | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community | | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, Document says | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL | | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3 , 2 (document | +| | | of cription) | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | , 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischl | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (document | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assista | omey dated | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | ' to Attorney dated | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronsti o | nt State Attorney dated | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fro tint | istant State Attorney dated | +| 74. | Letter from G nstin to Assistant State Attorney dated | | +| 75. | Letter Gol erger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 76. | A | | +| | il. e issued to State Grand Jury | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 77. | b . ,I. is related to the rental of a vehicle for | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 81. | Police report regarding | picking up money | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 14 | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4 0, 11 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | , 7, 10, I1 | +| 89. | Flight information for | 3, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, I 1 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.maria | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US cases \ , | 3, 4, 12 (document | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 51h Amendment S | 'l\ 3, 4, 12 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 95. | Police | 11-28-04 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 96. | Victim's school rec ds an | nscripts 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification le dated 7-9-08 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 98. | Police report of ar Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 99. | Victi s edica Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 100. Al su | conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey | | +| | ' ' home | | +| 1 | 'Is received from Palm Beach Records related to | | +| 103. All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 104. Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 109. reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not ibit | +| 110. reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his | N 'bit | +| 111. By listing an Exhibit, | is not waiving his right to No exhibit | +| 112. All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to | Not an exhibit | +| 113. All pleadings and attachments in the actio | a | +| Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted b | I wards | +| on behalf of victims of Epstein's crim | lestations. | +| 114. Motions for Summary J | I attachments 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 115. All time records and hourly | ' d mentation | +| 116. All deposition testimo | overy responses by | +| Epstein submitted in | is a t n. | +| 117. All pleadings filed b | in in the Rothstein bankruptcy | +| 118. All submissio | in connection with the | +| Rothste' cposi ' n. | | +| hi I molestations. | | +| 120. rnal taken from Epstein's home and produced to | | +| 121. oto depicting | Ghislaine Maxwell and 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 122. All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 124. Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 126. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| 127. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclainl,_Jan | 9 2013 | +| 128. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| | O 14C ' ' | +| Plaintiff | Fourth Amended | +| 129. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| | 3, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 131. Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | 's | +| 132. New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey E | a | +| 133. Any and all responses to Subpoenas | with or | +| 134. All Interrogatories and | to, Requests to | +| Produce and Responses | or Admissions and | +| 135. Any and all docume | pro ced in this action. 12 | +| 136. Any and all de | tions taken in this action. 12 (document provided is | +| 137. Any d 4" nts or other exhibit attached to or used during | | +| an d • iti n in this action | | +| 1 314 and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any | | +| 140. Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | 12 (document provided is | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action | 12 (document provided is not reflective of description), 13 | +| 142. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action | 12 (document provided is not reflective of description), 13 | + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the atto Service List below on November 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). ed on the t to Florida + +> LINK & ROCKEN 1555 Palm Beac West Palm B (561) 727- C Boulevard, Suite 301 da 33401 727-3601 [fax] + +By./ + +Link (FBN 602991) + +erard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +gela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +rimary: Scott@linIcrocIdaw.com + +Primary: Kara(41inkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Angelaelinkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tinaelinkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: TanyaQiinIcrocklaw.com + +Secondary: EserviceOlinIcrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

█████ J. █████
█████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
█████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3dce41b3af203506a60255481f868eafc7de92e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874/EFTA02760874.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,433 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760874.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 35099, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 DED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 507.34799999999996, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 507.34799999999996, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 347.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 415.981 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 415.981 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 430.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 430.03999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 220.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 220.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760874" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..597f1aa9cf282783d8aefb15c4b5fcc7f477834f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.md @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ +J. L.M., individually, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, , individually, and + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +Defendant(s). + +## MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTLNG PRETRIAL DEADLINES + +, through his undersigned attorneys, moves this Honorable Court to sta ai b reconfirm all existing pretrial dead tf? a \ lished by prior Court order and in support of this motion would show: + +Defendant Epstein .moved to continue the special set trial of this matter on a variety of grounds. The Cou expressly rejected all grounds raised by Epstein but reserved ruling on the motion for based solely on the need for the Court to determine whether additional time w ary for the Court to resolve pending legal issues. The Court subsequently determined there was a need to continue the trial again citing as the sole basis for continuing the trial the need to resolve pending legal issues in advance of trial. The order resetting the trial did not alter any pretrial deadlines including the discovery cutoff date. Nevertheless, Epstein has taken the position that none of the existing deadlines continue to impose any obligation on the parties, + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +specifically including but not limited to the obligation to complete discovery by the previously imposed discovery cutoff date. + +Given Epstein's well-established pattern of unreasonable delay in this and every other case he has defended, the Plaintiff objects to any effort to expand existing deadlines thereby create new opportunities to generate excuses for even more delays. This pane stination and delay is clearly illustrated by the history of discovery chronicled in attar ed Exhibit A. + +Accordingly, M• requests entry of an nfirming that all previously established deadlines continue to apply. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and co the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this OV • , 2017. + +CAROLA + +Bar No.: 169440 + +omey E-Mail(s): jsxa.searcvlaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +for J. + +Attorneys. Fax: 561-3 + +██████████ adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## EXHIBIT A HISTORY OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION CONDUCT + +| | WITNESS(ES) | DATE DEPO | | +|----------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------| +| 4/5/10 | Scott Rothstein (c/o Marc S. Murkin, Esq.) | 4/15/10 | | +| 416/10 | Michael Fisten & Richard Fandry | 4/19/10 | | +| 4/16/10 | Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for | | | +| | | 5/19/10 | Cancelled | +| 12/6/10 | Gary IIIII(corrected) (Apparently misdated and | | | +| | | 1/26/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Mike Fisten | 1/19/11 | | +| 12/16/10 | Adler | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Ken Jenne | 1/25/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Scott Rothstein | 1/21/11 | | +| 12/16/10 | Gary Farmer | 1/26/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Debra | 1/27/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | A.J. Discala | 1/28/11 | YES (on | +| 12/16/10 | Thane Richie | 1/31/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Michael Legamaro | 2/1/11 | Cancelled | +| 12/16/10 | Kretsclunar | 2/4/11 | YES (on | +| 1/4/11 | Herbert Stettin, Trustee for Bankruptcy for RRA | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/6/11 | Mike Fisten (corrected) | 1/19/11 | | +| 1/6/11 | Adler (corrected) | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/6/11 | Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/6/11 | Scott Rothstein (corrected) | 1/21/11 | YES | +| 1/6/11 | Ken Jenne (corrected) | 1/25/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/6/11 | Debra (corrected) | 1/27/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/11/11 | III KretschmaLatNotice) | 2/11/11 | YES | +| 1/19/11 | Cancellation of Adler | 1/20/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/19/11 | Cancellation of Herb Stettin | | Cancelled | + +| 1/21/11 | Cancellation of Ken Jenne | 1/25/11 | Cancelled | +|----------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------| +| 1/24/11 | Cancellation of Debra | 1/27/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/24/11 | Cancellation of Gary | 1/26/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/28/11 | Cancellation of Michael Legamaro | 2/1/11 | Cancelled | +| 1/28/11 | Cancellation of Thane Ritchie | 1/31/11 | Cancelled | +| 2/2/11 | A.J. Discala | 2/22/11 | YES (on | +| 2/8/11 | Thane Ritchie | 2/22/11 | Cancelled | +| 2/23/11 | A.J. Discala (Re-Notice) | 2/23/11 | YES (on | +| 2/23/11 | Michael Legamaro | 3/11/11 | YES | +| 3/4/11 | R/C Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for | | | +| | | 3/16/11 | Cancelled | +| 3/8/11 | A.J. Discala (Re-Notice) | 3/10/11 | YES (on | +| 4/6/11 | Adler | 4/20/11 | YES | +| 4/7/11 | AJ Discala (Re-Notice) | 912/11 | YES (on | +| 4/13/11 | AJ Discala (Re-Notice | | | +| | | 5/25/11 | YES | +| 5/16/11 | Cara | 6/10/11 | Cancelled | +| 6/6/11 | Cara Re-Notice | 6/21/11 | Cancelled | +| 6/6/11 | Cancellation of Cara | 6/10/11 | Cancelled | +| 10/24/12 | | 11/13/12 | YES | +| 4/5/13 | A: | 5/15/13 | YES | +| 4/23/13 | (Amended) | 5/15/13 | YES | +| 8/6/13 | I | 10/10/13 | YES | +| 8/2/17 | Attorney Coleman requested deposition dates for 4 | | | +| 8/2/17 | Mr. | attorney responded with dates | | +| 8/3/17 | Ms. Coleman asked Mr. | to confirm that | | +| | he would accept service or re | clients (LM, EW | | +| 8/3/17 | Mr. | confirmed that he would accept | | +| 8/9/17 | Mr. MIIIITIN | Coleman specify | | +| | which dates in ear y | cto er s e choses to take | | + +| 8/9/17 | Ms. Coleman selected 7 dates between Oct. 10 and October 19 | | | +|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/14/17 | Mr. [REDACTED]'s counsel provided 3 dates 10/5, 10/11 and 10/12/17 | | | +| 8/14/17 | Ms. Coleman instructed Mr. [REDACTED]'s counsel to hold 10/5, 10/11 and 10/12/17 | | | +| 8/16/17 | Mr. [REDACTED]'s confirmed that he would make his clients available on any date | | | +| 8/29/17 | [REDACTED] | 9/12/17 | YES | +| 8/29/17 | [REDACTED] | 11/10/17 | YES | +| 8/31/17 | Re-Notice [REDACTED] | 10/12/17 | YES | +| 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] | | NO.
Cancelled
unilaterally
by
Epstein's
counsel on
9.26.17 | +| 10/12/17 | EW (in prison) | 10/12/17 | YES | +| | | | | + +Epstein's counsel noticed Virginia 9/26/17, they unilaterally cancelled 10/5/17 and EW (in prison) for 10/12. On deposition. Epstein's counsel never used 10/11/17 and never set anyone for 10/5/17. The only date they made use of was 10/12/17, the date EW was deposed. + +No other depositions were attempted to be set until a request was made on 11/3/17 to depose Dr. James Jansen and a request was made on 11/3/17 to depose 8 attorneys. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00cfd4fa755b678f790aa6203f649c377516bdea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884/EFTA02760884.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760884.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 12547, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 76.084 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 76.084 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 117.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 117.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTLNG PRETRIAL DEADLINES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 364.707 + ], + [ + 485.0997009277344, + 364.707 + ], + [ + 485.0997009277344, + 379.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 379.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A \nHISTORY OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION CONDUCT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.08998107910156, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 118.7135009765625 + ], + [ + 150.08998107910156, + 118.7135009765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760884" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..412fd6ac020b7bc4fef864bd88ad960812cfe30d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB ,69 + +cl - N cps '.4 e •- OA t-L c r tP + +## NOTICE OF HEARING. + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the unde • r following: has called up for hearing the + +DATE: June 30, 2010 + +TIME: 8:45 A.M. + +t JUDGE: Judge David . + +PLACE: 205 N. 'xie hway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM: 9C + +SPECIFIC MA 11 TO B • HEARD: + +PLAINTIFF' ON TO COMPEL DEPOSI TO APPEAR FOR FOLLOW-UP + +-au) r cam c\_ m + +Mo ing counsel certifies that he or she has contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771 or (V) 1-800-955-8770- via Florida Relay + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this day of June, 2010 to : + +.1. =, Jr., Es Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A \_OA' 2139 W Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. est Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 + +CO .1 + +iS5) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +( S' + ++6s + +s o. 647896 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94d65b8033a12fbb53d3e70def8fa0dcf154a660 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890/EFTA02760890.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760890.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1923, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.602, + 86.211 + ], + [ + 555.4710693359375, + 86.211 + ], + [ + 555.4710693359375, + 131.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 305.602, + 131.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.37200000000004, + 314.712 + ], + [ + 385.251708984375, + 314.712 + ], + [ + 385.251708984375, + 330.363037109375 + ], + [ + 251.37200000000004, + 330.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760890" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03e4a92456b5279930840810639475528683f6fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.md @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, Judge: HAFELE + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF TONJA HADDAD, P.A. AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. of Tonja Haddad, P.A., co-counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in this matter, pursuant to Rule 2.505(f) of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, hereby mov is Cart for entry of an Order allowing Ms. Coleman and her firm to withdraw as co-counsel For in the above-referenced case. In support thereof, movant states: + +- 1. Epstein has,obtained additional counsel to represent his interests in this matter, and as such, he will bfricIequately represented by new counsel. +- 2. of the parties to this action will be prejudiced by the withdrawal of Tonja Hadda d Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. +- 2. Epstein has consented to the withdrawal of Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. as his co-counsel in this matter. See executed consent from Jeffrey Epstein, attached hereto as Exhibit A. + +Accordingly, Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. respectfully request that this Court enter an Order granting the Motion to Withdraw and as aresult thereof release them from any further obligation in this case. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +Ihereby certify that atrue and correct copy of this Motion was served on all pprties listed on the attached service list, via electronic service, this November 15, 2017. + +/s/ Tonia Haddad WarnC") + +Tonja Haddad Colennsq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +Tonja Haddad& + +5315 SE 7 + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +( 954.3373716 (facsimile) + +Tonja®TonjaHaddad.com + +Efiling®TonjaHaddad.com + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola + +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +mepesearcylaw.com + +isx@searcvlaw.com + +scarolateam@searcvlaw.com + +Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +III J. + +Jaffee, Weissing, En Fistos & + +Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 + +staff.efile(apathotojustice.com + +Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaint ff + +J. + +Scott J. Link + +Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Angela M. Many + +Link & Rockcnbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Angclae,linkrocklaw.com + +Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey E + +W. Ches , Jr. + +W. Chester Jr. P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +wcblaw@aol.com + +wcblawasst©gmail.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +Nicholc J. Segal + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 + +444 West Railroad Avenue + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +nis(aFLAAtmellateLaw.com + +kbt rr FLAnpellateLaw.com + +Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Marc S. Nurik + +Law Offices of Mare S. Nurik + +One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +marcfampiiclaw.com + +Counsel4kr endant Scott Rothstein + +ki t addad + +ddad & Navarro, PLLC + +"I Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 iaoldbercer@aawna.com smahoneveaawna.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +I hereby consent to the withdrawal of Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad [REDACTED] man, Esq. as my co-counsel in this case. + +![]()Jeffrey E. Epstein +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Dated: November 15, 2017 + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07a7ee53bd1b602e955142e4bc68452f949d1b34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892/EFTA02760892.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760892.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3953, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.25, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF TONJA HADDAD, P.A. AS CO-COUNSEL OF \nRECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.084, + 316.741 + ], + [ + 517.1016845703125, + 316.741 + ], + [ + 517.1016845703125, + 348.0963134765625 + ], + [ + 96.084, + 348.0963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 390.52655029296875, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 390.52655029296875, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 182.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 352.9495849609375, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 352.9495849609375, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 248 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "Text", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760892" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1f906468bbdbb9b3467bd1b810c369ef90255cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.md @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800)CCXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. and LM., individually, individually, + +Defendants, + +#### UNILATERAL PRETRI ENT + +Cos + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Speciall t Jury Trial, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ( ) hereby sub is nilateral Pretrial Statement based upon the Defendant, Epstein's decision not to i e i existing pretrial deadlines. + +#### 1. List of All Pend C n .,Mk) ns (all set for hearing on November 29.2017): + +- 1. Epstein's Motion +- 2. Epstein's O +- 3. Epstein's Pro Agree +- 4. Epsfej laun; +- 5. E 'n's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery 4 41 bus porary Stay of Proceedings; lion in Limine; for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement nst Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant J. and his Counsel; Lion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth Amended + +- I. Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence as to which Discovery was withheld under Claims of Privilege with Incorporated Memorandum of Law; + +there is no material factua 2. Did Epstein initi a dicial proceeding against M? I contends that e as to this issue.] + +of this case is an issue of law to 1. -S> Whether Epstein had probabl ring suit against for the claims brought by him; I contends th exist nee of probable cause under the circumstances by the Court.] + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 2 of 7 + +- 2. Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Int. served 12/21/12; +- 3. Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to RTP served 12/21/12; +- 4. Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to RFA served 2/26/13; Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to RTP served 4/15/11; MFPO re Deposition of +- 5. + +2. Stipulated Facts: None. + +CO SA + +#### 3. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determinatio rial: + +A. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Ed of fact for determination at trial: that the following are issues + +3. e r Epstein sued maliciously; and/or continued the prosecution of the claims g wards maliciously; + +hether and to what extent has been damaged in the past and will continue to be damaged in the future; + +5. Whether and in what amount it is appropriate to impose punitive damages against Epstein; + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +DefendanUCounter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 7 + +#### 4. Exhibit Lists (with Objections): + +a Exhibit List is attached as Exhibit A + +#### 5. Witness Lists: + +Witness List is attached as Exhibit B + +#### 6. Estimated Trial Time: 10 trial days + +#### 7. Names. Addresses, and TelenhoneeSers of Attorneys to "En the Case: + +For Jeffrey Epstein: + +Jack A. Goldberger, Es (\' jgoldberger@agwpa. smahoney@agwp Atterbury, Gold rger eiss, P.A. 250 Autralian A u outh, Suite 1400 West PalmBeach, 33401 Phone: (56 6\*-8300 Fax.(561) -8691 + +J. nk, Esq. + +÷ a)ic & Rockenbach, P.A. + +linIcrocIdaw.com + +linIcrocIdaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 4 of 7 + +For J. + +Jack Scarola, Esquire David P. Vitale Jr., Esquire Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 4: 41\ 1 Fax: (561) 3812411. Attorneys for J. + +C) + +# 8. Number of Peremptory Challenges Per Party: \_3 C + +## 9. Each Party's proposed jury instructioLid, erdict form, with citations to supporting authorities: + +a proposed jury instr4ttc 'onsverdict form are attached as Exhibit `C" + +#### Proposed St t o he Case to be read to the jury: + +claims effrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause filed and continued to prosecu uit against Mr. . That lawsuit alleged that Mr. fabricated sexual claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of three clients. According to the lawsuit le in filed against Mr. a, Mr. pursued the fabricated claims as part of wards' knowing participation in an illegal Ponzi scheme with Scott Rothstein. Mr. claims that he was damaged by the false and malicious claims that Mr. Epstein filed against him. + +Jeffrey Epstein denies that claim. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 5 of 7 + +Each of the attorneys who will try the case on behalf of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] has read the Order Specially Setting Trial and have fully complied with the Order or will comply by the first day of trial. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 6 of 7 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@Jinkrocklaw.com ICara@linkrocIdaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 Phone: 561-727-3600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Aetc + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"C\* C) + +< ) Nichole J. Segal, Esquire P njs@FLAppellateLaw.co • kb ppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach 444 W Railroad Av e, S e 350 West Palm Beac 33401 Phone: (561)- Attorneys f y J. + +Esquire staff.efil thtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800X3OOCMBAG Unilateral Pretrial Statement Page 7 + +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)-467-6767 Fax: (954)467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +S C O . iS 5) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04c14abbbbd58fc51b89549993251a8c1e91bc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896/EFTA02760896.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,551 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760896.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 6756, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 116.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 116.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNILATERAL PRETRI \nENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.72, + 349.82099999999997 + ], + [ + 419.2741394042969, + 349.82099999999997 + ], + [ + 419.2741394042969, + 365.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 365.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. List of All Pend C n .,Mk) ns (all set for hearing on November 29.2017):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 460.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 508.3132629394531, + 460.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 508.3132629394531, + 475.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 475.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determinatio rial:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 426.36773681640625, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 426.36773681640625, + 312.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 312.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Exhibit Lists (with Objections):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 309.8504638671875, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 309.8504638671875, + 146.60302734375 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 146.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Witness Lists:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 220.26817321777344, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 220.26817321777344, + 229.10302734375 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 229.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Estimated Trial Time: 10 trial days", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 324.5855407714844, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 324.5855407714844, + 312.3630676269531 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 312.3630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. Names. Addresses, and TelenhoneeSers of Attorneys to \"En the Case:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 352.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 523.077880859375, + 352.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 523.077880859375, + 367.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 367.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "8. Number of Peremptory Challenges Per Party: _3 C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 255.43658447265625 + ], + [ + 437.3279113769531, + 255.43658447265625 + ], + [ + 437.3279113769531, + 311.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 311.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "9. Each Party's proposed jury instructioLid, erdict form, with citations to \nsupporting authorities:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 542.7406616210938, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 542.7406616210938, + 371.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 371.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Proposed St t o he Case to be read to the jury:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 441.72650146484375, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 441.72650146484375, + 454.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 454.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.9140625, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.9140625, + 145.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 145.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760896" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f82867b809c4944ec92995404192b4c5c821679 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.md @@ -0,0 +1,1459 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +#### \ HCC5) COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, LEY I AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-PI Amended Exhibit List as follows: BRADLEY J. and hereby files his + +- O. No objection +- I. All objections +- 2. All objectio cept duthenticity +- 3. Irreley9t(Anaterial +- 4. Probative-value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +#### O OBJECTIONS + +![](_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein Case No. Counter-Plaintiff's, vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG J. Amended Exhibit List + +| | Counter-Plaintiff | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit | +| | Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes. | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes. | +| 3 | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | +| | 6 .8841SY airplanes and automobiles. Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Own .\ | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. | +| 7. | Messages taken from message/sr fo at Epstein's home. | +| 8. | Documents related to Je y psgein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein's fligholag, | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein' e records. ,- phone records. t | +| | a Visi Lion Logs. | +| 13. | y Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| I 5. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed. | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, . and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, JIM Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and L.M. | +|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff's, | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | +| | arked Marked for | +| | Objection In Menet Identification | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent | +| | Ac z 7 | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and | +| | any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets. CO | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Eps \ | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High ool Book. | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach qo Year Book. | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach G ens i School Year Book. | +| 27. | Affidavit and Applicati n for Search Warrant on | +| | Notepat ound in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or | +| | in esti ion. | +| 29. | alm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800X X XXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff
No. | | Description of Exhibit | Objection | Marked
in Evidence | Marked for
Identification | +| 32. | | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | | | | +| 33. | | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 34. | | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, , Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | | | Marked | Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home.. | | | | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes. | | | | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED]. | | | | | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement. | | | | | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victim. | | | | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim. | | | | | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06. | | | | | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs. | | | | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 50200911100XXXXINBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | arked Marked for | +| | Objection in vMeeet Identification | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto | +| | regarding house island project. AIR | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on | +| | 6-3A ic? | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy ta n -08. | +| 59. | Maccage Table. | +| 60. | No Contact Orders ent Jeffrey Epstein. | +| | Criminal Score Shee ing Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62. | Documents evitIettein Jeffrey Epstein's | +| | Comm 'ty Co4rol and Probation. | +| 63. | Je p 'n's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | +| 65. | '44D calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts. | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, I. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, IIIIIII | and L.M. | +|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff's, | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | +| | rked Marked for | +| | Objection n idence Identification | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler. | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein. O AS' . | +| 70 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| | State Attorney dated 1-11-06. CA) | +| 71 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| 72 | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| | State Attorney dated 2-17-06. 777 | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assis | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin ss t | +| | State Attorney dated 4- 0- 2 | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberg da d 6-22-06. | +| 76. | All subpoenas i tXi ft o State Grand Jury. | +| 77. | Docu related to the rental of a vehicle for | +| 78. | te\d%tSheds Documents. | +| 79 | \Dpcuments related to property searches of Jeffrey | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | +| 81 | Police report regarding picking up | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXX XIMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and L.M. | +|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| Case No. | 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG | +| Counter-Plaintiff's, | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| Counter-Plaintiff | Marked Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410. | +| 84. | O Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06. | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | +| | ACe 88. Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. | +| 89. | Flight information for | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beac : 05. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein note d not A ir aria. | +| 92. | Pleadings of J e Doe i and 2 v. US case. | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein Amendment Speech. | +| 94. | Reiter tte ICrisher dated 5-1-06. | +| 95. | 14. . New= ■ Police Report dated 11-28-04. | +| 96. | \Victim's school records and transcripts. | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter dated 7-9-08. | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home. | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J MI, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists. | | | | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | | | | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey. | | | | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto. | | | | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause. | | | | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items. | | | | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits. | | | | +| 110. | [REDACTED] reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, I Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, [REDACTED] is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | | | | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to [REDACTED] objections. | | | | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by [REDACTED] on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | | | | +| 114. | [REDACTED] Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto and all Undisputed Facts. | | | | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | | | | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | | | | +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | | | | +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | | | | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | | | | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 121. | Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. | and L.M. | +|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff's, | J. | Amended Exhibit List | +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection evidence Identification | +| | | m in | +| 122. | | -arisy | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails | | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | | +| 125 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments | | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Brady | sand | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstei | 1 and | +| | L.M, Fourth Amended Counte ' | 9, 2013. | +| | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Roih,ste | .1. and | +| 129 Jeffrey | tein v Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| L.M, No | of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012. | | +| 131. \ | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry | | +| 132 | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J M, Amended Exhibit List + +| | Jeffrey Epstein | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, | +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection in Evidence Identification | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List Counter-Plaintiff Description of Exhibit | +| 133. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or | +| | without deposition. l , y All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto. | +| 135. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 136. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 137. | Any documents or other exhibit attach r during any deposition in this action. | +| 138. | Any and all exhibits, docume tc. erred to in any deposition. | +| 139 | Any and all documents)an bits designated by all parties to this action. Ca) | +| 140. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | +| 141. | Any and, all pleadings filed in this action. | +| 142. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all /Ards lustodians relative to this action. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] / J. [REDACTED] s and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] / J. [REDACTED] s, Amended Exhibit List + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] / J. [REDACTED] s + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. race No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Slate carolaam Esquire @searcylaw.com; Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 4414ak , \_scaro 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Fax: (561) 383-9451 Phone: (6 6 -600 West Palm5 1)Beach86, FL 3 33409 Attorneys for J. + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com iS 4)9 Kara®IinIcrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 4\ West Palm Beach, FL 33401 **Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Ccia.we** + +**William Chester =, EsquiC wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmfil.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 140 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 7- Phone: (561)-655-4777 Fax: (561)-835-869 Attorneys fo y pstem** + +**Jack A. th, r, Esquire jgold gwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein** + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +J. Esquire staftefile@pathtojustice.com Fanner Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +O,4 4ak + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling®tonjahaddad.com Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +iS C/) ) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +S" + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +#### SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BIFADIIEYJ. + +O + +C + +SA' + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. ED and through his undersigned attorneys, + +hereby supplements his list of witnesses rial follows: + +#### WITNESS EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED + +- 1. 2.. Jeffrey E • +- 3. S i (formerly MI) Stephenson Peachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 +- 5. Guiffre do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +![](_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff I. Page 2 of 22 + +- 6. +- 7. +- 8. +- 9. raliguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, New York 10016 do nrguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, 10016 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449 do Robert C. Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Sty Miami, FL 33131 +- 10. Robert C. Jose Podhurst Orsec One S.E. Ord AveildE, Suite 2700 Miami, F 1 +- 11. Live Recarey m ch Police Department South County Road Beach, FL 33480 Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 13. John Connolly do & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff MI 1MI + +Page 3 of 22 + +- 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 16. Antonio (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida +- 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 ent +- 18. Records Custodian of United taV Attorney's Office for the Southern District gfRdlonda' +- 19. Records Custodian t ral Bureau of Investigations +- 20. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Faith Beach, Florida 33409 +- 21. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street I 17th Floor New York, NY 10017 +- 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. 'MI Page 4 of 22 + +- 24. Isidro M. OM Esquire =Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +- 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Cornwell, P.A. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +- 28. 1040 South Shore Dile Miami Beach, FL 33 41 +- 29. Landon ME cklistew York Times Eighth Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022 +- 31. LaVecchio United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +# WITNESSES WHIC S A ) CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 5 of 22 + +- 32. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 536 N. Edinburgh Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90048 C +- 35. Angelique =I do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law G 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suit\ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 33. Eugenia Ignatieva 1650 Broadway, #910 New York, NY 10019 +- 34. +- 36. +- 37. me , randy Brenson c/o Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barn art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Bead, FL 33409 do Robert C. JOsefsberg, Esq. Pgdhurst Orseck, PA e'.94 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 i, FL 33131 + - 39. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +i + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. c/o Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +4. 411c + +41. William Scherer, Esquire 633 S Federal Hwy #800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 + +43. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 4 " ) 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suit\ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +44. 1212 N. Clark Street West Hollywood, + +45. ght do Robert C. Jose erg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One,S.E. 3"CAvenue, Suite 2700 1vkiackFL 3131 + +46. fifer + obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +47. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3' Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 7 of 22 + +- 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW I A MA + +- 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown + +- 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3'd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +- 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 + +- 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, St West Palm Beach, F + +- 53. do Adam Horo C 'tz. Horowitz Law 425 North Atxhpws Avenue, Suite 2 Fort uderciale FL 33301 + +ye obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. urst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +- 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +I MADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXUM BAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 8 of 22 + +- 56. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 57. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480 +- 59. +- 60. do Robert C. Jose sberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3'd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131 do Robert C. J Podhurst Orsec One S.E. 3'd Avenu , Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 61. Saige do Spencer Kuvin ( 1800 South Australian Ave #400 miest Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128 +- 63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW 2id AVE., Miami, FL 33169 + +70. do Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 9 of 22 + +64. , Esq. Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +65. do , Esq. Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +66. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +67. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews 4 iii Fort Lauderdale F + +68. do Adam orowi Horowitz 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 uderdale FL 33301 + +69. itt Kurkendall eral Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW 2"d Ave. Miami, FL 33169 + +1. + +COSA + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Pagc IO of 22 + +- 71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown +- 72. +- 73. Address Currently Unknown 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021 +- 74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 3 Cos +- 77. Any additional incliy a dentitled as victims by the United States Attorney's Office and whose identi were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list supplied as it related to the NPA. +- 78. Leslie Weigle-7- Three Limited Parkway COIthcs, Ohio 43206 79 t ident Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 725 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 +- 80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401 +- 81. Maritza Vasquez 1293 SW 2IM Terrace Miami, FL 33145 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 11 of 22 + +1. 82. Maximilia [REDACTED] + c/o William Unroch, Esquire + 140 West End, Apt. 30-BW + New York, NY 10023 +2. 83. [REDACTED] + c/o Spencer Kuvin + 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +3. 84. [REDACTED] + 2915 Share Rd. 111 + Tallahassee, FL 31312 +4. 85. [REDACTED] + c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + Podhurst Orseck, PA + One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 + Miami, FL 33131 +5. 86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin) + 11675 Glowing Sunset Lane + Las Vegas, NV 89135 +6. 87. [REDACTED] + 12247 72ND CT N + West Palm Beach, FL 33412 +7. 88. Michael Fisten + Weston, FL +8. 89. [REDACTED] Adler + Delray Beach, FL +9. 90. [REDACTED] Alessi + 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. + Boynton Beach, FL 33472 +10. 91. Janusz Banasiak + 358 El Brillo Way + Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 12 of 22 + +92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +Acd,14, + +94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +West S C) Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942 95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane " + +96. Rosalie 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92: + +97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently + +98. 301 East 66TH S , Apt. 11P New Yen Y 10065 + +99. n, South Africa + +10 1040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137 + +101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206 + +102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road + +MW. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page I3 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +- 103. Officer Minot Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 104. Sgt. Sorge Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 105. Address Currently Unknown +- 106. Pagnano 1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 107. Stephan Kosslyn 28 Garfield Street Cambridge, 021 +- 108. Cecile Dejongh 23 8 Estate Ma St. VI 00 +- 109. Tommy Mdttola 302 Caribbean Road Beach, FL 33480-3012 Ike Sanka 449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 S/A Witness #108 +- 112. William "Bill" 5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391 Coral Springs, FL 33076 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 14 of 22 + +- 113. Howard Rubenstein 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 +- 114. Robert Meister 101 Seminole Ave. Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 115. Todd Meister 101 Seminole Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 116. President William J. Clinton +- 117. William Hammond 2965 Fontana Place Palm Beach, FL +- 118. Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, #25 West Palm Beach, Flori +- 119. Michele Pagan \_a Palm Beach Pollee Dep ent 345 South County Road Palm Beach. FL 3380 +- 120. Michele Da son Palm Beach Police Department CPal 5lAth County Road Beach, FL 33480 1 . 12/. my Fortimer 2309 North Old Country Road Wellington, FL 33414 +- 122. 545 East 5" Street, Apt. 6E New York, NY 10009 + +4 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 15 of 22 + +- 123. 971 NW Fresco Way, Apt. 208 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 +- 124. +- 125. 3139 Kingston Court, West Palm Beach, Florida 9 Pinta Road Miami, FL 33133-2607 +- 126. Latasha Lowe do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 127. 115 Sunshine Blvd West Palm Beach, Flori +- 128. Zack Bryan 1150 Larch WaC Wellington, Flo +- 129. 13 Avenue 37 des, CA 90065-3241 48 Cobblefield Dr.. Wellington, FL 33449 +- 131. Story Cowles 801 S Olive Ave., Unit 20IS West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 132. Michael Dawson Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +co + +I MIADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Mt + +Page 16 of 22 + +- 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134 +- 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101 +- 135. Sergia 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131 +- 136. Cassandra 5011 El Claro Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415 +- 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highways West Palm Beach, FL 3 +- 138. Address Cu +- 139. Steven Hoffenberg Address +- 140. Stroll Oglas Shoettle 243 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 ly Unknown Currently Unknown +- 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown +- 143. Amazon Records Custodian +- 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +cos + +- 155. Epstein andam Street New York, NY 10013 +- 156. c/o Alan S. Esq. 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +=MIA DV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amcnded and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff MI. + +Page 17 of 22 + +- 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +- 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +- 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL +- 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian West Palm Beach, FL 33406 3344 Forest M Blvd., Suite C-124 C +- 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 150. Wellington Reg S < h Blvd. final Hospital Reco n 10104 Forrest Wellington, FL 33414 Si\ M +- 151. All witnesses that Defen ha listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff. +- 152. All rebuttal wilt(( +- 153. All Peopl on Je y Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +## WITNES p TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED ( \ BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 18 of 22 + +do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL + +- 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +- 159. Jeffrey Epstein + +- 160. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +#### EXPER + +- 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarp 2139 Palm Beach Lakes vd. West Palm Beach, FL-33409 & Shipley + +Cos + +The following witnesses are attorneys that arc not retained or specially employed to provide expert teei'ony, but may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di c , ry/I)-the prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +- I ert C. Josefsberg, Esquire Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Ma ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintif1M + +Page 19 of 22 + +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 167. Isidro M.E., Esquire MI Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL +- 169. William Berger ut Weiss, Handler, mwell, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, Suite 218A Boca Rato 3431 \*te 1600 + +Plaintiff resery ght to amend this list. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 20 of 22 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CT + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. + +Page 21 of 22 + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com; Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott®linkrocklaw.com Kara®Jinkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester =, Esquire wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawas 250 S Australian Avenue, Suit West Palm Beach, FL 3 401 Phone: (561)-655-4777 Fax: (561)-835-8691- Attorneys for Je Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberg , Esquire jgoldberge4ag a.com; smahoney@agwpa.com AtterbWOoldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 22 of 22 + +J. Esquire + +staftefile@pathtojustice.com + +Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fax: (954)-524-2822 4414ak Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 4)9 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ? One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 S" Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +CO AS + +#### DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. On November 9, ds filed his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form. +- 2. pleading: hereby adds the following additional proposed jury instruction to that + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestation, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +As a consequence of these rovisions in both federal and state law, proper pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein was not limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein against the three clients represented by . The law expressly allowed Mr. to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexual assault or child molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +![](_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg) + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 2 of 3 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14Th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmceann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CLERK + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 3 + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com KaraOlinIcrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester Esquire wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-655-4777 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldbergergagwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss; P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J:Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +J. Esquire staff. efi le@pathtojustice.co 425 N Andrews Avenue, S Fort Lauderdale, FL 3339 Phone: (954)-524-2 Fax: (954)-524-2 + +Fred Haddadrkqu Dee@FredHaddidLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 eS1%, Phone: (954)-467-6767 Pax: (954)-467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +J. and L.M., individually, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually. Q SA + +Dcfendants, + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +\-1 + +#### DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF' ED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDI + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Propo tions and Verdict Forms for trial in the above-styled matter. + +I HE EBY FY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Co e attached list, this day of , 2017. + +> JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 Attorney E-Mail(s): isx@searcvlaw.com; and mmccarm@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam©searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys J. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS + +#### 201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE + +Welcome. The Clerk will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a di people or companies[or others, as appropriate, where the claims of one or 0S f these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a la + +This case concerns whether Jeffrey Epstein had probabl alleging that Mr. had fabricated and exa by that three underage females had been r Epstein over a period of years as part of a pattern of mo According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, the reason M molesting these underage females was to kno investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars with convicted Ponzi schemer, Scott Roth filed on behalf of his 3 clients were we wrongdoing. Jeffrey Epstein knew that that he, Jeffrey Epstein, was guilty other underage females. sue Attorney aims in civil lawsuits filed xually molested by Jeffrey f dozens of underage females. falsely accused Epstein of sexual in a criminal scheme to defraud a series of felonies in cooperation ey contends that the lawsuits he that he, Mr. was innocent of any was innocent and Jeffrey Epstein knew y molesting Mr. 3 clients and dozens of + +While Attorney it was publicl Attorney worked, used the fact that ual ab investors to bu nt is millions of d rosecuting his clients' sexual abuse claims against Epstein, the senior partner in the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm where othstein, had conducted a fraudulent scheme which, in part, had claims against Epstein were being prosecuted by the firm to induce in non-existent settlements. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. + +ands further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed suit against Attorney for the sole rpose of attempting to intimidate Mr. into abandoning or cheaply compromise his clients' claims. Epstein eventually settled the claims being prosecuted by Attorney on behalf of his clients, the same claims that Epstein alleged in this lawsuit were fabricated, for approximately a total of \$5.5 million. + +Attorney continued to defend against Epstein's lawsuit, challenging it on the grounds that it had no legal or factual support. Shortly before the Court was scheduled to rule on Mr. III/ challenge, Epstein dismissed all of his claims against Attorney M. Furthermore, Epstein allowed the statute of limitations to expire making it legally impossible for Epstein to brio an claims based on the conduct he sued upon in the original complaint. Yet while Epstein denies M . claim for malicious prosecution, he has refused to answer any + +questions about the civil claims he says were fabricated or about the basis for claiming knowingly participated in a massive fraud. + +The principal witnesses who will testify in this case are: + +TO BE COVERED DURING VOIR DIRE. + +## 201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to e as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and e ho to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you t need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on a issyes of this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plain that is sued is called the Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of their clients here at the trial. They have takgpaths rules of their profession. \tti their clients. That is, they speak for attorneys to do their best and to follow the + +Plaintiff's Counsel: TheCI ll this side of the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents and is the pe rs o filed the claim in dispute. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. Mbrola and his client will be referred to most of the time as "the plaintiff". Mr. Sci ro will you please introduce who is sitting at the table with you? + +: The attorneys on this side of the courtroom, (introduce by name), represent ffrey Epstein, the one who has been sued. His/Her job is to present his/her client's side of things to you. He/She and his/her client will usually be referred to here as "the defendant". (Attorney name), will you please introduce who is sitting at the table with you? + +Court Clerk: This person sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. He/She is here to assist me with some of the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that are introduced in the course of the trial. + +Court Reporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. His/Her job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. His/Her job is to maintain order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. Anything you need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should be bro him/her. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the case. 0 14 do that. i % + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begin to se moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what the facts an at the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point and ha 4c;1 o opinion about the lawsuit. it, + +At In order to have a fair and lawful trial, there t all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case only on vi ce presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyone, inc l ds and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or your se ce. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on how t deci is case. + +I want to stress th cyi ss tlerule means you must not use electronic devices or computers to communicate abo is , including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information o or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messa m anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, maps, or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom. + +'You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, videl ordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end oft while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury C ei omeone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages d them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you. + +ric What are the reasons for these rules? These e c posed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and only on th presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make inquiries o our outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that the info obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportunity to dispute ge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary to our judicial system, which a s every party the right to ask questions about and challenge the evidence being co ered ainst it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Any independent i ves ation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportu ty= judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start over. A mistrial is a tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the taxpayers. If you violate + +Alternative B instruction. + +these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, such as serving time in jail, paying a fine or both. + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, or me, will be part of the record of these proceedings. That means those communications shall either be made in open court with the court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing will be filed with the court clerk. I have instructed the courtroom personnel that any communications you have with th ide of my presence must be reported to me, and I will tell the parties and their t eys about any communication from you that I believe may be of interest to the parti attorneys. + +However, you may communicate directly with co concerning your comfort and safety, such as juror parking, break areas, how and when to assemble for duty, dress, what personal items can u into the courthouse or jury room. onnel about matters + +If you become aware of any violation ructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me by giving a to to bailiff. + +# A 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE V R RE PROCESS + +The last thing I want to o, be we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +ue tions/ len : This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportun .et o know a little bit about you, in order to help them come to their own concl ut your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide who they think should be the juro in this case. + +How we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some general questions of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific questions that they will ask of you. After they have asked all of their questions, I will meet with them and they will tell me their choices for jurors. Each side can ask that I exclude a person from serving on a jury if they can give me a reason to believe that he or she might be unable to be fair and impartial. That is what is called a challenge + +for cause. The lawyers also have a certain number of what are called peremptory challenges, by which they may exclude a person from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of elimination, the remaining persons are selected as the jury. It may take more than one conference among the parties, their attorneys, and me before the final selections are made. + +Purpose of Questioning: The questions that you will be asked during this process are not intended to embarrass you or unnecessarily pry into your personal affairs, but it is4ortant that the parties and their attorneys know enough about you to make this im decision. If a question is asked that you would prefer not to answer in front of the w/hal oom, just let me ) know and you can come up here and give your answer just in front of theattiorneys and me. If you have a question of either the attorneys or me, don't hesitat c know. + +Response to Questioning: There are no righyor \ o answers to the questions that will be asked of you. The only thing that I ask is that yoo answer the questions as frankly and as honestly and as completely as you can. lstake an oath to answer all questions truthfully and completely and you must do s fining silent when you have information you should disclose is a violation of that o th as I. If a juror violates this oath, it not only may result in having to try the case all r again but also can result in civil and criminal penalties against a juror personally. agai it is very important that you be as honest and complete with your answers as yo can. If you don't understand the question, please raise your hand and ask for an on or clarification. + +In s m, this is a process to assist the parties and their attorneys to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you are for this purpose. If, for ally reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror, you must tell us. + +#### 202.1 INTRODUCTION + +You have now taken an oath to serve as jurors in this trial. Before we begin, I am going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to this case and let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +It is my intention to give you some of the rules of law but it might be that I will not know for sure all of the law that will apply in this case until all of the evidence is prese However, I can anticipate most of the law and give it to you at the beginning of the~.t~o that you will better understand what to be looking for while the evidence is prose, different or additional law applies to the case, I will tell you. evidence I will give you the final instructions on which yo your verdict. At that time, you will have a complete written set of the instructio ss SsOSZ , not have to memorize what I am about to tell you. later decide that ent, at the end of the + +The following are the rules of law pee to apply in this case. + +[READ RELEVAN CTI0NS BEGINNING AT PG. 20] + +## 202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a chance to make what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is allowed to give you his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you are likely to see and hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening statements the plaintiffs will bring their witnesses and evidence to you. + +Evidence: Evidence is the information that the law allows you to see or hear in deciding this case. Evidence includes the testimony of the witnesses, documents, and anything else that I instruct you to consider. + +Witnesses: A witness is a person who takes an oath to tell the truth and then answers attorneys' questions for the jury. The answering of attorneys' questions by witnesses is called "giving testimony." Testimony means statements that are made when someone has sworn an oath to tell the truth. + +The plaintiffs' lawyer will normally question the witness first. That is called direct examination. Then the defense lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever the witness has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other evidence may also be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the plaintiffs' witnesses have testified, the defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses on the stand and go through the same process. Then the plaintiffs' lawyer gets to do cross-examination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that you remember that testimony come from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimony and they are not themselves witnesses. + +Objections: Sometimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a question is asked of a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may make what is called an "objection." The rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are many reasons for the attorneys to object. You should simply wait for me to decide how to proceed. objection is "sustained", that means the witness may not answer the que ta'b) objection is "overruled", that means the witness may answer the ques c:• rd. y that an I say that the + +no me from that decision ng a trial are being correctly ou must not try to guess what the When there is an objection and I make a decision, you m that I have any particular opinion other than that the rules f followed. If I say a question may not be asked or answer would have been. That is against the + +Side Bar Conferences: Sometim of the case that are not appropriate of these conferences as possibl to speak to the attorneys about legal elements to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few u are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if we do have to have suc Ill oc ference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference at the side of my desk at we not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroom. + +Rece s in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses". During a recess you still haveprr duties as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been presented to you, I will instruct you on the law that you must follow. It is important that you remember these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which come next, and later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence to reach your decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the opportunity to make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing arguments, I will instruct you further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you must follow to decide the case. + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury instructions, you will go to the jury room and discuss and decide the questions I have put on your verdict form. You will have a ot2 + +2 Durkin v. MI 814 So. 2d 1246, 1248-49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("As to malice on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff need not allege actual malice; legal malice is sufficient and may be inferred from, among other things, a lack of probable cause, gross negligence, or great indifference to persons, property, or the rights of others. Here, the allegations supporting a lack of probable cause are evidence from which a jury could infer malice.") (emphasis added). + +## 406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING + +One is regarded as having instituted or continued a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted or + +continued. A Cos + +#### b. Concurring cause: + +#### 406.7 LEGAL CAUSE + +#### a. Legal cause generally: + +The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury, or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage, so that it can reasonably be said that, but for the malicious ic institution or continuation of a proceeding, the loss, injury, or damage would not Ws I' cured. + +O S In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, injury, or dam e th malicious institution or continuation of such a proceeding need not be the only The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding may be a legal cause of loss • amage even though it operates in combination with the act of another or so use if the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes sub VS ti o producing such loss, injury, or damage. + +#### c. Intervening cause: + +The malicious institutioir continuation of a proceeding may also be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage even th t operates in combination with the act of another or some other cause occurring e e malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding occurs if such other cause was sonably foreseeable and the malicious institution or continuation of a proceed' con ributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage or the resulting loss, injury, or damage was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding and the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing it. + +#### **406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM** + +The issues you must decide on [REDACTED] claim against Jeffrey Epstein are whether Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause instituted or continued a civil proceeding against [REDACTED] which later terminated in favor of [REDACTED] and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage to [REDACTED]. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### 406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM + +If the greater weight of the evidence does not support should be for Jeffrey Epstein. claim, your verdict + +However, if the greater weight of the evidence supports verdict should be for and against Jeffrey Epstein. claim, then your + +A Goes + +#### 406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for i you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate for such loss, injury, or damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceeding complained of. + +If you find for you shall consider the following elept f damage: + +#### COMPENSATORY DAMAGES + +# a. Injury to reputation or health; shame. humiliation. mental a C t feelings: + +Any injury to reputation or health and any sham feelings experienced in the past or to be experienced i fixing the compensation to be awarded on account of fair and just in the light of the evidence. ion, mental anguish, and hurt There is no exact standard for nts of damage. Any award should be + +#### b. Fear of physical injury to himself°, mbe of his family. + +Any loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life experienced in the past or to be experienced in the future. There is no exact standard for measuring such damage. The amount should be fair and just in the light of the evidence. 14/ 4) 3/ + +#### c. Lost earnings, lost time, Learning capacity: + +#### (I). When lasjearningsjer lost lime shown: + +Any ea to earn mo os nd the reasonable value of any time lost in the past and any loss of ability (Mare. + +#### d. The reasonable expenses, including lawyers' fees, necessarily incurred by proceeding complained of. in the + +#### e. Punitive damages: + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +b(J). Punitive damages for ac/s of an individual defendant: + +claims that pun' be awarded against Jeffrey Epstein for his conduct in filing a lawsuit ' without probable cause to support the allegations of wrongdoing by and with no intentio obligation to provide relevant and material discovery in support of this lawsuit. cl pa pstein's purpose for filing this lawsuit was instead to attempt to intimi and his clients and others into abandoning their legitimate sexual abuse claims against e y pstein. Punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convincing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which was a substantial cause of loss, injury, or damage to . Under those circa stances you may, in your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear convincing evidence does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not ran against Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Epstein had actual knowledge oft wrongfulness of the conduct and there was a high probability of injury or damage to Bradley s and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that Jeffrey Epstein's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of posed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" differs from the more compelling and persuasive. As I have already ins means the more persuasive and convincing force an ght of the evidence" in that it is "greater weight of the evidence" e entire evidence in the case. + +c(2). Punitive damages — determination of amoun + +Pik You are to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensatory damages you have previously aw Med. In making this determination, you should consider the following: + +(A). the nature, extent an following: e of misconduct and the related circumstances, including the wrongful conduct was motivated solely by unreasonable financial gain; ii, et r the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likeli i i i oft jury resulting from the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey Epstein; to ha and aentdimthe eoefolonssdu, conduct of Jeffrey dyaEmpsatgeein, Jdeffidreiny Efapesttehian had rm mific intent l(B). Ithe financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein + +You may in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +#### 601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your ansv4rs will be. Your agreed-upon answers to my questions are called your jury verdict. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of th s, all exhibits received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to b the ies and any fact of which the court instructs you to accept. + +In reaching your verdict, you must think a 14, eigh the testimony and any documents, photographs, or other material that \* \ n ceived in evidence. You may also consider any facts that were admitted or a o b e lawyers. Your job is to determine what the facts are. You may use reason on sense to reach conclusions. You may draw reasonable inferences from the • But you should not guess about things that were not covered here. And, you must apply the law as I have explained it to you. + +## 601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES + +Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; the intelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the case; the means and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witness testified; t ' ity of the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testified; and the bleness of the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of all the evidence irytfle din the light of your own experience and commons sense. + +Iti You have heard opinion testimony on certain tec is from persons referred to as expert witnesses. + +You may accept such opinion testimon considering the knowledge, skill, expe given by the witness for the opinio t ive it the weight you think it deserves, ing, or education of the witness, the reasons , and all the other evidence in the case. + +O + +#### ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION — FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the right to remain silent. However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit, particularly when that lawsuit was begun by a person who then refuses to answer questions about the lawsuit. + +A 1 Jurors may draw reasonable conclusions that the refusal to provide or to produce other information relating to a civil lawsuit based on a refusal to ingrltlti neself is because those answers or that information would in fact be incrimina person refusing to provide the answers and information. erwise harmful to the + +Simply put, if a party in a civil lawsuit refu Ao S oss v r questions on the grounds that the answers may tend to incriminate him, you ma that he is refusing to answer because, in fact, the answer would be incriminating, j4 you y consider the refusal as evidence against him. + +### **601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)** + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attorneys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have a few last instructions for you. + +A During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case only AS e another and only when all jurors are present in the jury room. You will have in th all of the evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching your dee c5' n, ) t do any research on your own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, the Intern , or ther reference materials. Do not investigate the case or conduct any experime \ visit or view the scene of any event involved in this case or look at maps or the Internet. If you happen to pass by the scene, do not stop or investigate. All ' rs t see or hear the same evidence at the same time. Do not read, listen to, or watc n accounts of this trial. + +You are not to conunun ate it any person outside the jury about this case. Until you have reached a verdict, y t ust or not talk about this case in person or through the telephone, writing, or electro comm cation, such as a blog, twitter, e-mail, text message, or any other means. Do n yone to assist you, such as a family accountant, doctor, or lawyer. These cations rules apply until I discharge you at the end of the case. + +If you become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by giving a note to the bailiff + +Any notes you have taken during the trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes are simply an aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are binding or conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own + +memory or that of other jurors. Instead, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the conclusion of the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. No one will ever read your notes. + +In reaching your verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public opinion, or any other sentiment for or against any party to influence your decision. Your verdict nfuelje based on the evidence that has been received and the law on which I have instruc + +Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot participat n cision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdict should m ething I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer one verdi o er er. Therefore, in reaching your verdict, you should not consider anything that "q v or done, except for my specific instructions to you. + +Pay careful attention to all the in ( \ t tion S hat I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a copy ' ctions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the instructions im rtant, and you must consider all of them together. There are no other laws that app is case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must use them in react\* ision in this case. + +Wh to the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as n during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussions are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have considered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if you are convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not give up your honest + +beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that you and your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case. + +I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answer. I have already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You must follow my instructions and the form carefully. You must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions now read the form to you: (read form of verdict) in the order they appear. After you answer a question, the form tells you what to d6rrit. I will IS + +form of verdict) You will be given (state number) forms of verdict, which I shod C ) to you: (read + +If you find for IM. your verdict will nItJ llowing form: (read form of verdict) + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, your ye verdict) in the following form: (read fonn of + +Your verdict must be unani o is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. When you have agreed on your erdi t d finished filling out the form, your foreperson must write the date and sign it llTierbottom and return the verdict to the bailiff. + +If any of y need t communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it to the bailiff. In our of , do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. + +now retire to decide your verdict. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)CCOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, individually, and + +Defendant, + +/ + +#### VERDICT FO + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +(1) Did Jeffrey Epstein commit mali S secution .' against e + +Yes + +A Cos + +If your answer is 'IV ot address question (2)below. If however, your answer is 'Yes, please paceed to question (2). + +elbount of damage, if any, sustained by as a consequence ngdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +\$ + +(3) Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein? + +Yes No + +(4) What is the total amount of punitive damages, if any, which you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, should be assessed against Jeffrey Epstein? + +S + +If you elect not to assess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein, you should enter a zero (0) as the amount of damages, and sign and date the verdict form. + +Ill you have elected not to assess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein en rip should skip the remaining questions and sign and date the verdict form. If, er, you have elected to assess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein, then ygQ3 answer the following questions:] + +At the time of loss in or damage to did Jeffrey Epstein have a s ecific intent to harm and did the co of ti effrey Epstein in fact harm \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e73e9f4ff582c7fa2b89277a8df87815e2c22900 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/EFTA02760903.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,4345 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 84, + "chars": 121889, + "elapsed_seconds": 26.48, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "\\ HCC5)\nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, LEY I \nAMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 368.05810546875 + ], + [ + 392.82196044921875, + 368.05810546875 + ], + [ + 392.82196044921875, + 404.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 404.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 442.44500000000005 + ], + [ + 370.79791259765625, + 442.44500000000005 + ], + [ + 370.79791259765625, + 457.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 457.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 355.44610595703125, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 355.44610595703125, + 146.103515625 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 146.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 531.3739013671875, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 531.3739013671875, + 126.73309326171875 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 126.73309326171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL \nWITNESS LIST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BIFADIIEYJ.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 472.01837158203125, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 472.01837158203125, + 365.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 365.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 429.0812072753906, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 429.0812072753906, + 444.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 444.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHIC S A ) CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 474.0796203613281, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 474.0796203613281, + 438.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 438.2235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNES p TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED \n( \\ BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 456.7998046875, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 456.7998046875, + 534.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 534.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 361.08, + 382.32 + ], + [ + 361.08, + 396.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 396.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.07611083984375, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.07611083984375, + 159.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 159.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 510.8498840332031, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 510.8498840332031, + 342.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 342.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 353.94610595703125, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 353.94610595703125, + 161.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 161.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.025390625, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.025390625, + 111.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 111.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF' ED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND \nVERDI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 528.13916015625, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 528.13916015625, + 400.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 400.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 406.37847900390625, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 406.37847900390625, + 82.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 82.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 277.1067199707031, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 277.1067199707031, + 110.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 110.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 432.7540588378906, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 432.7540588378906, + 178.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 178.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A\n201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE V R RE PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 424.44000000000005 + ], + [ + 369.3002014160156, + 424.44000000000005 + ], + [ + 369.3002014160156, + 458.64227294921875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 458.64227294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 203.96160888671875, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 203.96160888671875, + 83.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 83.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 365.976, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 365.976, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 82.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 270.394775390625, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 270.394775390625, + 84.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 84.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 JURORQUESTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 223.8106689453125, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 223.8106689453125, + 84.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 84.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED \nTESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 542.7964477539062, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 542.7964477539062, + 96.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 96.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 251.088134765625, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 251.088134765625, + 135.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 135.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 181.21676635742188, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 181.21676635742188, + 242.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 242.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 204.60263061523438, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 204.60263061523438, + 380.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 380.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Stipulations:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 163.85858154296875, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 163.85858154296875, + 491.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 491.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. A mis \u2022 .", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 159.7619171142578, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 159.7619171142578, + 574.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 574.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. pplicable to 0 parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 251.48007202148438, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 251.48007202148438, + 601.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 601.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Applicable to fewer than all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.144, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 309.26654052734375, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 309.26654052734375, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 83.42999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.6800000000001, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.6800000000001, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 82.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.0539855957031, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.0539855957031, + 79.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 79.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 154.80274963378906, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 154.80274963378906, + 106.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 106.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids based on disputed taAptions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 472.38177490234375, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 472.38177490234375, + 300.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 300.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 397.8517761230469, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 397.8517761230469, + 84.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 84.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 205.4616241455078, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 205.4616241455078, + 84.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 84.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.72518920898438, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.72518920898438, + 83.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 83.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 339.3226318359375, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 339.3226318359375, + 83.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 83.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 82.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 82.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.5 MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 157.53298950195312, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 157.53298950195312, + 112.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 112.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 387.41156005859375, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 387.41156005859375, + 85.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Concurring cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 193.38658142089844, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 193.38658142089844, + 262.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 262.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.7 LEGAL CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 193.81231689453125, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 193.81231689453125, + 84.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 84.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 213.69004821777344, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 213.69004821777344, + 111.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 111.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 192.25657653808594, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 192.25657653808594, + 439.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 439.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 83.42999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 288.8240966796875, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 288.8240966796875, + 85.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 339.5679626464844, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 339.5679626464844, + 84.84405517578125 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 84.84405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPENSATORY DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 269.8514099121094, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 269.8514099121094, + 277.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 277.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Injury to reputation or health; shame. humiliation. mental a \nC \nt feelings:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 258.72998046875 + ], + [ + 480.98797607421875, + 258.72998046875 + ], + [ + 480.98797607421875, + 317.0705871582031 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 317.0705871582031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Fear of physical injury to himself\u00b0, mbe of his family.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 404.4117126464844 + ], + [ + 377.58270263671875, + 404.4117126464844 + ], + [ + 377.58270263671875, + 417.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 417.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Lost earnings, lost time, Learning capacity:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 481.6617126464844 + ], + [ + 287.89794921875, + 481.6617126464844 + ], + [ + 287.89794921875, + 494.83056640625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 494.83056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(I). When lasjearningsjer lost lime shown:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 286.4036560058594, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 286.4036560058594, + 520.33056640625 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 520.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. The reasonable expenses, including lawyers' fees, necessarily incurred by \nproceeding complained of. \nin the", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 596.0417022705078 + ], + [ + 538.9702758789062, + 596.0417022705078 + ], + [ + 538.9702758789062, + 623.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 623.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Punitive damages:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 175.36634826660156, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 175.36634826660156, + 648.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 648.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 271.06805419921875, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 271.06805419921875, + 126.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 126.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 300.62841796875, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 300.62841796875, + 84.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 84.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION \u2014 FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 428.22412109375, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 428.22412109375, + 84.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 84.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 312.6530456542969, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 312.6530456542969, + 111.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 111.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 119.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 119.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 353.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 353.73248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760903" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6af46df7f0f7bd0c8fda9af176e914ad14e554c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4569a2c7ef66017e423faf96f83aa4724d8da32aff0f3e5022497feed7f47e8a +size 8311 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b66181cf92aff28ea52a9f12ab8f37d93ff1770a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:395a94b2ec08d444b3bc2ca6662233bda51c9b1a939285608f4791391a1e47b0 +size 8332 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..138fc4989f816fb7d21079aca9ef146399a9ee0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760903/_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f4f866f1299a46e38c047d1be25b732406df3fd88d3dcdd5ce6dfa32d0c43276 +size 8090 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..210a024cd876dca94dffde810ac268cf8ca94552 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING W. CHESTER la JR., P.A.'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPDATE FILE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J rey Epstein, filed by W. Chester Jr., P.A. and W. Chester Jr. The Co reviewed the Motion, and having been advised of the agreement of the parties, he + +ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the Motion is GRANTED. W. Chester =, Jr., P.A. and W. Chester , Jr. are hereby discharged as co-counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in this action and are further relieved of any further obligation, duties or responsibilities in this case. + +The Clerk is directed to remove W. Chester =, Jr., P.A. and W. Chester =, Jr. as counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr Lein. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm B ch, Pal l each County, Florida this/J day of November, 2017. + +> TH CIRC T COUR ONALD W. HAFELE GE + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and -15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800X• XXXMBAG Agreed Order Granting W. Chester Jr. P.A.'s Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and Directions to Clerk to Update File Page 2 + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
W. Chester ██████, Jr. P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
wcblaw@aol.com
wcblawasst@gmail.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

| + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXX.PAG Agreed Order Granting W. Chester Jr. P.A.'s Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Recordlorl i ttiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and Directions to Clerk to Update File Page 3 + +Scott J. Link + +Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Angela M. Many + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Trov@linkrocklaw.com + +Tanva®linkrocklaw.com + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +4s) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99ad0de48b87720bcdfbfe69d9e76fe8f8f78fc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987/EFTA02760987.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760987.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6262, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING W. CHESTER la JR., P.A.'S \nMOTION TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO \nCLERK TO UPDATE FILE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 309.298 + ], + [ + 527.3278198242188, + 309.298 + ], + [ + 527.3278198242188, + 366.10302734375 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 366.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.7940368652344, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.7940368652344, + 191.60302734375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 191.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760987" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06efd04cbeae0f8ea83cf66c638e695924e601a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.md @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAO + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/C C )-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTI PEL DISCOVERY + +Counter-Plaintiff J. (" "), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380 of the Flori a ivil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order denying Plaintiff/C endant Jeffrey Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and in sup rt th states as follows: + +## INTRODUCTION + +Since the F \*da S reme Court's mandate was issued on June 9, 2017, the Court has repeatedly counsel that this eight-year-old case is to be prepared in anticipation for trial. In u y 20, 2017, the Court entered its Order Specially Setting Trial, which special set this cau , number one, for a 10-day jury trial beginning on December 5, 2017.i The Court has since made itself available for numerous hearings on discovery issues and any outstanding motions that counsel chose to set for hearing. + +The Court has since reset this cause for a 10 day jury trial beginning March 13, 2018, solely to allow the Court additional time to resolve outstanding motions in advance of the trial. See Order dated November 14, 2017. + +During this time, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") has been represented by six (6) separate law firms. These attorneys have, pursuant to their judgment on how this case should be prepared for trial, conducted discovery and engaged in extensive motion practice before the Court. By way of example, on September 25, 2017, Epstein filed his Motion to Compel Discovery Re onses from which concerned various discovery requests from 2012. At the tit ste filed his Motion to Compel regarding the 2012 discovery, he chose not to challenge- E- a s' Answers to ----- Interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, which had served on Autvt1), 2017, approximately six weeks earlier. + +Epstein also chose not to set his Motion to Corn discovery for hearing. Epstein further declined to challenge Answers to too ries dated September 5, 2017, which were served on October 5, 2017 (two months, al). As part of counsel's litigation strategy, the last weeks preceding trial on other matters, rig of depositions, the filing of a Motion for Temporary ntinue the trial in this case indefinitely, and the filing of a Epstein instead elected to focus his ti such as the repeated scheduling Stay of Proceeding, which see spurious Motion for Sanc gainst and undersigned counsel which has no possible bearing on the tri he pending claim. + +O case as in counsel for Epstein. In addition, Epstein has hired a "team of lawyers from the Gunster law firm as trial support."2 As is readily apparent from the numerous motions that have been filed since then, including Epstein's eve-of-trial Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, Epstein's new trial counsel would like to drastically change 1, 2017, the law firm of Link & Rockenbach entered an appearance in this + +2 Epstein's Motion to Continue filed November 6, 2017, at page 3. + +the scope and tenor of this case. In essence, the actions of Epstein's trial counsel reflect either a complete misunderstanding of the fundamental nature of this malicious prosecution case or a conscious effort to attempt to transform this case into an entirely different lawsuit. But that is not the way it works when experienced litigators are hired on the eve of trial. I tead, these experienced litigators are required to accept the case preparation that was per n\ the four prior law firms that have been defending Epstein against MB malici , ution claim. + +This brief recitation of the procedural history since the Flori Sup eme Court's mandate is important because, throughout the Supplemental Moti Compel Discovery, Epstein repeatedly claims that he "has been, and continues t iced in this counterclaim by refusal to comply with his discovery ." See, e.g, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery at page 4. pr ice, however, is entirely self-inflicted by Epstein and is insufficient to overco s' proper objections to the discovery at issue. Accordingly, the Court should C e Discovery. eve-of-trial Supplemental Motion to Compel + +# MEMORANDUM OF LAW + +Epstein's lemental Motion to Compel Discovery concerns the following discovery responses by tdwards: (1)M' Answers to Interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, filed on August 2017; (2) Answers to Interrogatories dated September 5, 2017, filed on October 5, 2017; and (3) Response to Request for Production dated September 5, 2017, filed on October 5, 2017. The Supplemental Motion also seeks to compel to answer and respond to Epstein's Expert Witness Interrogatories and Request for Production, which were served on October 13, 2017. The response date for those discovery requests, however, was + +November 20, 2017, making it unclear as to what exactly Epstein's premature motion asked the Court to rule on. has since served formal responses to that discovery. + +N,N ill address each discovery response in turn. + +a. Answers to Interrogatories dated July 12, 2017, filed on Augus 11, 2017 + +On August 1 I, 2017, served his Answers to Interrogatories d u 12, 2017, in which he asserted valid objections to various interrogatories propound rds. Three (3 months later, Epstein now challenges the following objections, all of hiclyare proper. + +> Interrogatory 1: As to every individual iden Witnesses, and each category/group of wj provide with particularity the following: n your List of Trial sled thereon, please + +> The proper name, address, telepho electronic email address or3 other means of contact for each + +In response, provided the rleniljtpd contact address for each witness for which had a contact address. E in insists that also provide the telephone number and e-mail address fo each ness. That, however, is not what Epstein asked for in Interrogatory #1, which es a ast of potential contact information and uses the term "or" to permit to se m the options provided. + +> 2: As to every individual identified on your List of Trial es, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please ide with particularity the following: + +> Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by the witness, including identifying with particularity as to which elements of your claim for Malicious Prosecution this witness' testimony is applicable. + +Unless otherwise stated, all emphasis is supplied by M. + +In response, described the issues that each witness expected to be presented at trial would testify to, and specifically identified the element(s) of malicious prosecution claim that each witnesses' testimony would relate to. See Exhibit `B' to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery. If Epstein wanted to determine the detailed subst ce of each witness' knowledge relative to these disclosures, he has for years had the o n t ubpoena witnesses for deposition who have been identified on successive witne years. This information has certainly been available long before the November discovery deadline. Since almost every one of the witnesses at issue were listed r Witness Lists filed in this case, dating back years, Epstein has had ample oppo t ubpoena these individuals for deposition, and his decision not to do so canno ted by challenging valid objections to interrogatories. + +> Interrogatory 3: As to Witnesses, and eacl provide with panic\* individual identified on your List of Trial group of witnesses listed thereon, please e following: + +> A detailed descr of the testimony expected to be presented at trial by the witne s to each contested factual issue or element of your claim against Ep + +In responSe, wards described the issues that each witness expected to be presented at trial would \ 4 , and specifically identified the element(s) of malicious prosecution claim tilt7t witness' testimony would relate to. See Exhibit 'B' to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery. Any additional information can only be derived from live deposition testimony, which Epstein chose not to take. Moreover, to ask to provide a more detailed description of the substance of expected witness testimony would necessarily be asking counsel to disclose his work product and mental impressions as to the specific questions he intends + +to ask, and as such, what facts and information counsel considers to be important to the case. Such disclosures are protected by the work-product privilege. See Motor Co. v. 997 So. 2d 1148, 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that opinion work product privilege extends to attorney's selection of facts and information the attorney considers important to the c ); see also, General Motors Corp. v.=, 837 So. 2d 1010, 1032 (Fla. DCA 2002 ( fin opinion work product as "the attorney's mental impressions, conclusions, opin r theories" and stating that such is protected from disclosure); State v. Rabin, 495 S 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (stating that opinion work product, i.e., the "attorney al impressions, conclusions, opinions, or theories concerning his client's case," is "absd1 fy4o nearly absolutely privileged"). + +Interrogatory 4: As to every individual idenid your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witness listul thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +A description of the Trial Exh umber of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by s. + +response star of August 11, 2017 (the date these Answers were filed) it was unknown as to w ' exhibits would be introduced through which witnesses. Epstein's complaint that this is n the eve of trial" is therefore severely misplaced. Although we are Il milir now on the ev o 'se ery cutoff, these Answers were filed over the summer, months before the prior D nal date. Moreover, this interrogatory is clearly seeking the mental impressions of counsel, and what exhibits counsel believes are appropriate to be introduced through each individual witness is protected by the work-product privilege. See Northup v. Acken, 865 So. 2d 1267, 1270 (Ha. 2004) (stating that personal view of attorney as to how and when to present evidence and knowledge of which witness will give certain testimony is attorney work product) (citing Surf Drugs. Inc. v. Vermette, 236 108, 112 (Fla. 1970)). + +> Interrogatory 5: As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: + +> A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit introduced through other means about which the witness is expected to testify, together with a description of the witness' expected testimony regarding ch exhibit. + +Similar to Interrogatory #4 above, M' Answer stated that, bacI IS August, it was unknown as to which witness would testify regarding which exhibit n, any such trial strategy is properly protected by the work-product privilege. See id. + +In conclusion, M . Answers to Interrogatories 12, 2017, which were served more than 3 months ago on August 11, 2017, are pro in's untimely and unsupportable Supplemental Motion to Compel should be de ' + +b. Answers to Interroga es d September 5, 2017, filed on October 5, 2017 + +Epstein's attempt to compel on the prior-filed damages interrogatories reveals a gross misunderstanding of Ed alicious prosecution claim that will be tried to a jury beginning on December t th. erEpstein apparently wants to take discovery to establish that the individual cases th wa s filed against Epstein on behalf of the minor children who Epstein had systema ra d and abused, benefited and enriched as an attorney. That, howev ter relevant nor material in this case. + +Ins d, the jury will be asked to determine whether the underlying case that Epstein filed si aha, (wherein Epstein alleged, without a shred of evidence, that fabricated sexual molestation claims as a knowing participant in a billion-dollar Ponzi scheme and was guilty of all sorts of nefarious criminal conduct), damaged as described in the Fourth Amended Counterclaim. Epstein's underlying claims in this case alleged that "fabricated" and + +"ginned up" his clients' sexual abuse cases in order to intentionally further Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, in which was a knowing participant. Therefore, the only damage discovery that is relevant to this litigation is discovery relating to the impact of the false allegations that Epstein made against in this case. + +Perhaps the most glaring example of Epstein's misdirection is demon challenge to Interrogatory #34: ad awaihEpstein's + +> Interrogatory 34: Please describe in detail and iderif; l with specificity every social medial outlet, website, blog [etc.] . . . or :ry\_46ther printed or published media on which you, your law firm has ever advertised. referenced, or otherwise placed the name of + +Essentially, Interrogatory #34 sought to dete ether involvement in the separate sex abuse cases ag however, that is not what this case is abo er separate sexual abuse cases against ter of no import, as been damaged as a result of thote casesllnstead, had advertised his tein to promote practice. Again, publicized his involvement in the is not alleging that he has is alleging that he has been damaged as a result of the underlying malicious claim against him, which was brought by Jeffrey Epstein without probable c (Be in an attempt to extort and pressure the young victims to dismiss or severely m se their civil sexual abuse cases against Epstein. If this numbered interro s only seeking relevant discovery related to how often has publicized e underlying claims against him in this case on his website or through other published materials, then the answer is simply "never." + +Epstein also suggests that "[w]hile claims he has suffered financial loss, he refuses to provide any information about any purported loss during the time in question." See + +Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery at p. 9, ¶ 234. This statement is simply untrue. As part of his damage claim, contends that he suffered "the loss of value of ] time required to be diverted from [his] professional responsibilities." has already provided time records, which provide a detailed breakdown of exactly ho 4 much 03 time lost as a result of Epstein's baseless and malicious lawsuit. The j 11 resented with this evidence and will be asked to assign a value on Edwar t • e, with the understanding that could have used that time to not only p ctice aw, but also to spend time with his family and young children, pursue hobbies, or ber of other activities. Thus, the suggestion that has refused to provide any 'n related to this portion of his damage claim is simply untrue. + +Epstein also challenges "S"Cl Sierrogatory I #32: + +unliquidated, be en Epstein's assertion that, on the eve-of-trial, he still "seeks to understand what is claiming in this case" is without merit. Epstein sued MEI, without probable cause, and alleged that was a criminal co-conspirator who was a knowing participant in the largest Ponzi 1S er is Ily responsive and informs Epstein that the damages in this case are II be instructed that there is no exact measure for such damages and will the responsibility of hearing the evidence and returning an appropriate verdict. + +Interrogatory 32: Ple financial loss, inclu described in your in detail, quantify and explain the ount that you contend to have suffered as ended Counterclaim, to wit: + +[listing Edward Countercl • age claims as detailed in the Fourth Amended + +This line of reasoning is also used to challenge MP answer to Interrogatory #36, which concerned IIME damage claim for loss of time spent defending against Epstein's malicious and baseless lawsuit. + +scheme in the history of the state of Florida. Epstein claimed that was abusing the legal system by pursuing "fabricated" and "ginned up" sexual abuse claims against Epstein in order to advance this criminal enterprise. The damage from these salacious allegations, particularly to IM reputation, have been specifically pled in every counterclaim for malicio rosecution dating back to 2011. + +- c. Response to Request for Production dated Septe , 017 filed on October 5, 2017. + +Epstein next takes issue with M' response to Reg or Production dated September 5, 2017, which was filed on October 5, 2017. + +> Request #1: A copy of all documents any and all information requested ' providing responses to, Plain Interrogatories to Defendant/ to Damages, served conte o, or reference or include, ou referred to in any way in er-Defendant Jeffi.i Epstein's ntiff J. Relating y herewith. + +answer properlyAZ attorney-work product privilege. Clearly, Epstein cannot ask counsel t Went' )all documents that "relate to . . . any and all information requested in, or referred 1 'n 40,, any way" in response to Epstein's damage interrogatories. Such a request on its face s the ental impressions of counsel as to what counsel believes to be related to the answe ue. n fact, the case cited by Epstein in his Supplemental Motion to Compel Discov e I Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Blvd, Ltd., 924 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), actually cu against Epstein's argument. Specifically, the Grinnell Corp. Court stated in pertinent part as follows: + +We quash that portion of the trial court's order directed at the response to request for production requiring that Grinnell (1) "label the documents [already produced] and support them as a broad general view," and (2) identify the pages of deposition testimony that supported various affirmative defenses. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350(b) requires that a response under the rule only produce items "as (emphasis added). Grinnell Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Blvd, Ltd., 924 So. 2d 887, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA3006) S + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery + +> they are kept in the usual course of business or ... identify them to correspond with the categories in the request." Going beyond what is required in the rule, the order compels Grinnell to label and classify depositions already taken and documents already produced, as they pertain to issues in the case. It was this type of order in Gardner that the supreme court disapproved in North up. + +Just as an attorney cannot be required to label and classify docume, e y produced to specific issues in a case, neither can counsel be required to etertlrine which documents he believes relate to Epstein's damages interrogatories, whi arty the mental workings of counsel that go well beyond what is required under t e fact that Epstein also seeks to disclose documents that h ring the interrogatories also seeks to invade the work-product privilege. In to Power and Light, 632 So. 2d 696, 697-99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), the court held that attorney's selection of certain documents would reveal the attorney's mental imp s r garding the relative importance of such documents and their significance as a collectio t information was protected from disclosure under the work product privilege. Similar, the identification of documents counsel believes relate to the damages irllerltRatories and to which documents counsel referred in preparing answers to such inte necessarily would reveal counsel's mental impressions regarding the relevance nd importance of such documents. Such information clearly constitutes protected opinion work product. See also Proskauerl. LLP v. Boca Airport Inc., 987 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2008) (holding that where discovery ordered would disclose to an opponent which documents counsel believed were most relevant in preparing witness for deposition, such information was protected by work product privilege). + +Finally, Epstein challenges M' objections to Requests #2-10. For brevity, refers the Court to pages 13-16 of Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Production, which list the requests at issue. + +Request #2 seeks the personal financial information of M, which is co itutionally protected, see art. I, § 23, Fla. Const., and is wholly unrelated to the damage a jssue. See also Bd. of Trustees of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Educational es, 99 So. 3d 450, 457-58 (Fla. 2012) (stating that personal financial information i verable where it is not relevant to any issue in the case). As previously state s lost time claim will be established through his time records, which reveal the nt of time that spent defending against Epstein's spurious and maliciouialeg ons. That time could have otherwise been used anyway that chose to use whether playing with his children, taking time off, pursuing hobbies, or taking on other used the time he was not spending defending against Epstein's mall founded claims and, to the extent he spent that time working on other cases, how mu as paid for that unrelated time, is clearly irrelevant because that time will not be prese ltT the jury as an element of damages. + +Similar tin discovery requests addressed above, Requests #3-10 seek discovery regarding the cases. Rather than seek discovery as to the allegations Epstein made against iltis case, Epstein seeks to uncover what is essentially file on the cases that were pursued against Epstein by his victims, LM, EW and Jane Doe. For the reasons stated previously, this discovery is irrelevant to the allegations made by Epstein in this case and is clearly protected by the attorney work-product privilege. See v. Harter, 152 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 161 DCA 2014) (quashing trial court's order compelling discovery of entire litigation file because such + +was protected by work-product and attorney-client privilege). also notes that requests 43 and 48 seek production of documents related to the \$5.5 million in settlement proceeds paid to victims LM, EW, and Jane Doe after he filed this lawsuit alleging that those claims had been fabricated by to further the Rothstein Ponzi scheme. is at a loss as t by Epstein continues to request disclosure of the settlements he paid to these victims, w • im Itaneously pursuing a Motion for Sanctions against and undersigned r purportedly breaching the confidentiality requirements of those very agreements. + +# d. Epstein's Expert Witness Discovery Dated Octobe cy 17 + +Finally, Epstein has asked the Court to prospec •it,n discovery responses that are not due until November 20, 2017. objet is ospective relief on ripeness grounds. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380 prof ' a party may move the court for an order compelling discovery if the opposing ii to answer a discovery request. cannot be said to have failed to answer t , as the answers were not yet due at the time the motion was filed. Moreover, as Epstein in his motion, had already voluntarily produced its expert's written opinion a documents utilized by the expert in reaching that expert opinion. On November 13, 2 provided formal written responses to this discovery. 0 CONCLUSION + +Fdrl the foregoing reasons, Counter-Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny Jeffrey Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Kara®linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"S C) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fax: (561)-835-8691 ?S' + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kb lateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for B J. Ed ards + +J. Ed uire staffefile tice.com 425 N venue, Suite 2 Fort Lau e, FL 33301 Phone: (95 -524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)467-6767 + +Fax: (954)-467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling®tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +S ic Marc CO .- S. Nurik, Esquire iS 5) + +marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5e28bbd7526f6820ab8149caf732c6fd755ea00 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990/EFTA02760990.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,702 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02760990.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 25177, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.525390625, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.525390625, + 117.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 117.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/C C )-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTI PEL DISCOVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 530.3759155273438, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 530.3759155273438, + 365.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 365.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 487.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 355.0888366699219, + 487.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 355.0888366699219, + 503.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 503.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 381.9196472167969, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 381.9196472167969, + 507.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 507.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Epstein's Expert Witness Discovery Dated Octobe cy 17", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 422.2629089355469, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 422.2629089355469, + 315.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 315.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 562.14 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.1312561035156, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.1312561035156, + 123.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 123.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02760990" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c78a24c9011650aecc6b6bdcd7e04c9b18c5381d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.md @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +# CROSS NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel ListN V + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the u de ned attorneys will take video deposition(s) of: + +## NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME + +Dr. Bernard J. Jansen December 1, 2017 9:30 a.m. + +VIDEOGRAPHE isual Evidence + +upon oral ex authori on fore Palm Beach Reporting, Inc., a Notary Public; or any other officer aw to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +# LOCATION + +Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 to all Counsel on the attached list, this I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting, Visual Evidence + +E-TRANSC IL CD AND/OR DVD REOUESTED + +O + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Cross Notice of Taking Video Deposition Page 2 + +day of 1\(3-11' , 2017. Asffc + +com lateam(nisearcylaw.com Searc Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 21311 h Lakes Boulevard ch, Florida 33409 61) 686-6300 V561-3 . meys for 1 J. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Cross Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 3 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Cross Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 4 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del Mo o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kék éd. Tanpri kontakte Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou park nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lé ou gen pou w parét nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblém pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e983a394d59af15134294c1426cfc77f4e744745 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006/EFTA02761006.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761006.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4823, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 116.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 116.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CROSS NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 451.49908447265625, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 451.49908447265625, + 351.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 351.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 340.9452819824219, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 340.9452819824219, + 453.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 453.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 451.542 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 451.542 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 392.904, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 464.5885314941406, + 438.31 + ], + [ + 464.5885314941406, + 453.863037109375 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 453.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 156.32999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761006" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa303328434d0889c3ebbaf7a6ef61e47d67e256 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.md @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTFISTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: < + +DATE: November 27, 2017 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-C + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at Ieast 7 days before your seheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Cr )- + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +( "AS \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..090cf901bba95fbb96b3d11c12bfd390db95d3a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011/EFTA02761011.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761011.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5001, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 350.64799999999997 + ], + [ + 370.922119140625, + 350.64799999999997 + ], + [ + 370.922119140625, + 365.35302734375 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 365.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.69000244140625, + 570.63 + ], + [ + 279.82171630859375, + 570.63 + ], + [ + 279.82171630859375, + 586.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 67.69000244140625, + 586.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 149.04 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761011" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bea5a08145e65d7a3fea601636e1c429cb4aad7d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.md @@ -0,0 +1,636 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. ,individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN V EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EXHI + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps\_t4h by files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter. + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All objections cept ithenticity +- 3. Irrelevan m rial +- 4. P !blue substantially outweighed by ger f unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Di [REDACTED] (5/25/11)
f. [REDACTED] Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney Wild (10/12/17) | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements | | | + +# L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +## 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Com laint | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Com laint | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoe | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Productio dant | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer§Il ye | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Seco A ed Complaint | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amend mt | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Sti ulation of Dismi reudice | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, d nscripts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes inclu mg, of limited to: | +| | | a. L.M. 9/2 10 | + +## L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +## USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | C. et, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | | al ery and discovery responses | +| 31 | 7/24/0 | o • • Taint and Demand for Jury Trial | +| 32 | 7/2 | tipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice D.E. 21) | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +## E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +## 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismiss' | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcript x b d | +| | | Ja v. of rey Epstein | +| | | USDC . ase No. 08-CV-80893 | +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all referenced therein and | +| | | all discovery an disco responses | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant tein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue | +| | | Action for' 4 ertain Based on Parallel Civil and | +| | | Cri n 1 Pro ings with Incorporated | +| | | M ndum of Law (D.E. 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | o e Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | +| | 4/9/09 | '. ' amtiffs Motion to Strike References to Non | +| | 4/17/09 | Plaintiffs First Amended , ip | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to | | | | +| | | Trump, Mark E . stein, Jean Luc | | | +| | | Bruhel, Michael Freidman, Rosalie | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | | | + +## Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated A • + +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80I + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| | | | | | | + +## Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA) + +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-C IV + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +#### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein + +### 17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | + +### In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A + +#### USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
  1. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
  2. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
  3. [REDACTED] Adler (10/28/10).
| | | | +| | | | | | | + +#### United ," f America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action + +## DC Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 75 | 11/9/09 | V | Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|----|----------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------| +| 76 | 11/23/09 | | d Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| 77 | 11/2 | mended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture | in Rem | + +#### The Florida Bar Matters + +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against ██████ J. ██████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc
Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/1/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler
(01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09 | E-mail from J. to Adler, | +| | 3:36 p.m. | William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | +| 118 | 7/13/09 | E-mail from Michele Dar an (Palm Beach Daily | +| | 2:28 p.m. | News) to J. 08404) | +| 119 | 7/4/09 | E-mail from J. to William J. | +| | 4:37 p.m. | Berger (0220D_ | +| 120 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from EM J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 1:17 p.m. | (04906) | +| 121 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:22 p.m. | (04905 | +| 122 | 7/18/09 | E-mail Lfrom M J. Adler | +| | 4:10 p.m. | (01661) | +| 123 | 7/21/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Leone | +| | 8:21 p.m. | (01352 | +| 124 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele n | +| | 11:22 a.m. | 01479 | +| 125 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradle | +| | 11:35 a.m. | 05803 | +| 126 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Jacquie to J. dwards | +| | 1:29 p.m. | (01662 | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from J. Edw noticing | +| 128 | 7/26/09 | E-mail from Priscila ju ento to Scott | +| | 5:28 p.m. | Rothstein, cc Amy and Adelita Cabello | +| 129 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from B to Susan Spencer | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Wendel (0 3) | +| 130 | 7/28/09 | E-mail fro n Spencer Wendel to J. | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Edw (03 70 | +| 131 | 7/28/09 | E- a m J. to Michele Dargan | +| 132 | 7/28/09 | -m it from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 10:00,a.m._ | 48 | +| 133 | 7/29/014/ | , E-mail from Cam L. to | +| | 1:13 ' | 08420 | +| 134 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:47 ..m. | 11075-11076 | +| 135 | 7/29/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:49 p.m. | (05852-05851)_ | +| 136 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (05535-05530_ | +| 137 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (11320-11322) | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 6:06 .m. | 05538-05539 | +| 139 | 7/31/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 11:20 a.m. | (11080-1108S | +| 140 | 8/10/09 | E-mail from J. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 6:59 .m. | 06965 | +| 141 | 8/10/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 7:23 p.m. | (06967 | +| 142 | 8/11/09 | E-mail Efron7MJ. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 8:43 a.m. | 06968-06969 | +| 143 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 9:29 a.m. | (06963-0696i. | +| 144 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from J. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 10:10 a.m. | 06970-06971 | +| 145 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 12:34 .m. | 06959-06960 | +| 146 | 8/14/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradle | +| | 4:40 p.m. | (06975 | +| 147 | 8/15/09 | E-mail fromM J. Fisten, cc | +| | 2:41 p.m. | Ken Jenne (02161 | +| 148 | 8/15/09 | E-mail from J. Edw whael Isikoff | +| | 6:00 p.m. | (06972-06973) | +| 149 | 8/17/09 | E-mail from MichaelJ611io o radley J. | +| | 10:32 a.m. | (06976-06977) | +| 150 | 8/17/09 | E-mail from B ey J. art to Jacquie | +| | 10:42 a.m. | (02442) | +| 151 | 8/19/09 | E-mail fro radley J. to Ken Jenne | +| | 2:47 p.m. | (01501) | +| 152 | 8/24/09 | E- m radley J. to | +| | 7:38 p.m. | 0 | +| 153 | 8/25/09 | .1 om to 3. | +| | 11:03 a. | 059 2-0595i. | +| 154 | 8/2 | -mail from J. to | +| | 9:56 p. | (02269 | +| 155 | 8/31/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 10:58 a.m. | 02895 | +| 156 | 9/2/09 | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to J. | +| | | 12:54 p.m. and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie Pat and | +| 157 | 9/7/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 1:39 p.m. | (07612-07613 | +| 158 | 9/7/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 6:42 p.m. | (02595-02596) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Beth S. | +| | 2:37 p.m. | Williamson (Wil4 | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:55 p.m. | (01280-01288 | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 1:37 p.m. | (03081 | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:42 .m. | (04320 | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | J. to | 404A" | +| | 6:31 a.m. | (04321 | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 6:53 a.m. | (04318-04319 | | O ' | +| 186 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:45 p.m. | (10586-10589 | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:09 a.m. | | cc Renee/Carlos | 029 | +| 188 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | J. to | | +| | 10:06 a.m. | (06789) | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 10:20 a.m. | (06788) | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from Mike Fisten to | n | arnoff | +| 191 | 9/29/09 | E-mail from | | to Ken Jenn and | +| | 10:06 a.m. | Elizabeth Villar (0 | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09 | E-mail from B | ey J. | ards to Nigel Rosser | +| | 10:41 a.m. | (06191 | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09 | E-mail fro | igel Rosser to | J. | +| | 11:08 a.m. | 06189-061 | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09 | E- m | ichael Isikoff to | J. | +| | 4:28 p.m. | (0 9 980 | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09 | 11- il om | | to Mike Fisten | +| | 4:52 p.m. | 02 0-02441 | | | +| 196 | 10449 | -mail from | J. | to Michael Isikoff, | +| | 4:53 pli. | cc Jacquie | (06974 | | +| 197 | 10/2/09 | | E-mail from Michael Isikoke.1. | | +| | 6:14 p.m. | cc Jacquie | 06955-06956) | | +| 198 | 10/8/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Richard | +| | 4:11 .m. | 06961 | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09 | E-mail from Grant J. | | to Scott Rothstein, | +| | 2:17 p.m. | J. | Ken Jenne Kip Hunter and | | +| | | | Adler, cc Grant J. | 2650 | +| 200 | 10/13/09 | E-mail from Mike Fisten to | | J. | +| | 2:27 p.m. | (01727) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED] Attorneys/id/3/read) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-[REDACTED]/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | + +## .e s + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's | c, R • en with | +|-----|----------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents pro | o i lied upon or | +| | | referenced by D Be | Jansen in preparing his | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Wi | Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in | +| | | Virginia Gt | . Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Sup | enta Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard | +| | | J. | in v. Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 287 | Misc. | | | +| | | it t io | | +| | | o r r. Bernard J. Jansen | | + +## Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog — Rothstein | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. ChiefJudge: | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all mat | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victi al | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, d | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared documents | +| 327 | | All foundation exhili | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and i exhibits | +| 329 | | Demonstrative a an ibits including, but not | +| | | limited to, charts, nes, diagrams, models, | +| | | surveys, p phs and blow-ups | +| 330 | | All newly IP - red documents/exhibits | +| | | An d all ibits listed by J. | +| | | wa ng is right to object to any of | + +PlaintifVC unter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ock9tw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been finished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +(SS E Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..417fb34bfec6ae3cd7e18a8674940e11b162f507 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016/EFTA02761016.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1244 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761016.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 24, + "chars": 106315, + "elapsed_seconds": 19.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN V EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED EXHI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 474.3887939453125, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 474.3887939453125, + 362.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 430.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 430.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 443.272 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 443.272 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 370.3737487792969, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 370.3737487792969, + 187.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 187.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "151\u00b0 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 468.97625732421875, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 468.97625732421875, + 199.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 199.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 370.3915710449219, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 370.3915710449219, + 510.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 510.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 412.9317626953125, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 412.9317626953125, + 523.9924926757812 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 523.9924926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 370.7715759277344, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 370.7715759277344, + 651.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 651.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "151\u00b0 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 468.97735595703125, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 468.97735595703125, + 665.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 665.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated A \u2022", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 269.60302734375 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 269.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 643.95 + ], + [ + 428.0738220214844, + 643.95 + ], + [ + 428.0738220214844, + 659.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 659.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 489.8946838378906, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 489.8946838378906, + 171.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 171.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.28, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 185.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.28, + 185.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 269.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 404.56561279296875, + 269.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 404.56561279296875, + 284.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 284.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 298.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 298.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United ,\" f America v. Scott Rothstein \u2014 Forfeiture Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 492.9375 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 492.9375 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 507.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 507.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DC Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.36, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 461.912109375, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 461.912109375, + 522.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 522.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.26002502441406, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 620.8000030517578 + ], + [ + 250.26002502441406, + 620.8000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ".e s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 409.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 409.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34075927734375, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34075927734375, + 606.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 606.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 91 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761016" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a871bd894ee1effc20cf1b586a3c6502ee8e11f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.md @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF FRED HADDAD. PA. [FORMERLY HADDAD & NAVARRO. PLLCJ AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Fred Haddad, P.A., [formerly Had avarro, PLLCJ as co-counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey in (''Plaintiff'), and pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.505(f) an Order allowing him to withdraw as Plaintiff's cocounsel and in support thereo uld state as follows: + +- I. Epstein ined additional counsel to represent his interests in this matter, and as such, he be adequately represented by new counsel, and such counsel and associates are desirous bf haddlig the entire case, particularly trial. 2, Because new counsel has been retained and the case has been continued until N March so that new counsel can fully prepare, there would be no prejudice allowing counsel to withdraw. +- 3. In March 2018, the undersigned is already scheduled to begin jury selection in State v. (bar, a death penalty matter expected to take three to four months to try. +- 4. Epstein has consented to the withdrawal of the undersigned counsel as his cocounsel in this matter. See executed consent from Jeffrey Epstein, attached hereto. + +Accordingly, Fred Haddad request that this Court enter an Order granting this Motion to Withdraw and releasing him from any further obligation in this case. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +FRED HADDAD, P.A. + 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 + Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + (954) 467-6767; (954) 467-3599 [fax] + +By: /s/FredHaddad + Fred Haddad (FBN 18089) + Primary: Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████████, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + + Scott J. Link + Kara Berard Rockenbach + Angela M. Many + Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + + W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. + W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. P.A. + 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[wcblaw@aol.com](mailto:wcblaw@aol.com) +[wcblawasst@gmail.com](mailto:wcblawasst@gmail.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + + Tonja Haddad Coleman + 315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301 + Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[tonja@tonjahaddad.com](mailto:tonja@tonjahaddad.com) +[efiling@tonjahaddad.com](mailto:efiling@tonjahaddad.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + + Jack A. Goldberger + Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + + NOT A CERTIFICATE OF COPY + + +I hereby consent to the withdrawal of Haddad & Navarro, PLLC and Fred Haddad (formerly with Fred Haddad, P.A.) as my co-counsel in this case. + +• Jeffrey E. Epstein Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Dated: November \_\_, 2017 "S y CO iS 4)9 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fed04d32e9ab97aca46eeda44d2774a29a859f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040/EFTA02761040.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761040.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5686, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF FRED HADDAD. PA. [FORMERLY HADDAD & \nNAVARRO. PLLCJ AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-\nDEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 375.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 375.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 387.396, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 387.396, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 155.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 402.57 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761040" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761044/EFTA02761044.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761044/EFTA02761044.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca37eb228db9cc7fb9a3e4069eb48cd232d648ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761044/EFTA02761044.md @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/C -PLAINTIFFia UNILATERAL PR TATEMENT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff which was prematurely filed with thj ("Plaintiff') hereby responds to ("Defendant") Unilateral Pretrial Statement, November 15, 2017 and states: + +On November 14, 20 norable Donald Hafele granted Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Trial. In • Order, the Court found that, "there arc simply too many significant, lengthy motions ding and need to be heard prior to December 5, 2017." See Order Granting Mo ' r QSntinuance of Trial attached as Exhibit A. Further, the Court recognized that "n la k how the court will rule on critical issues would require counsel to try to strategize d plan their respective cases under extreme uncertainty and duress." Id. + +Moreover, the outcome of the extensive and numerous pretrial motions, which are not scheduled to be heard until November 29, 2017, December 5, 2017 and December 7, 2017, will + +likely lead to amendments of the parties' respective Exhibit and Witness Lists and further discovery. + +Pursuant to this Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial, "Unilateral Pretrial Statements are disallowed, unless approved by the court, after notice and hearing showing good cause." See Order Specially Setting Jury Trial attached as Exhibit B. + +Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to the filing of Defendant's Unilateral Pre tement as it is premature until the Court determines the scope of the trial and wh will be tried. Plaintiff certifies that he will cooperate in good faith to prepare the tement once the pending Motions have been resolved by the Court and ' o nce with the Court's determination of the timing for filing Pretrial Statements. + +# CERTIFI + +I certify that the foregoing documen Service List below on November 16, 2017, Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b furnished to the attorneys listed on the e Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +INK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott(alinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaOlinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservicealinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

█████ J. █████
█████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
█████

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. + +SCOTT ROTI-\_ ISTEIN i\_individually, and J. individually, L M, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +4 + +## ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL SETTING HEA NGS AND RESETTING CASE FOR SPECIAL SET TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Motion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines or, in the Alternative, Bifurcation of Trial, and the court, having heard arguments of counsel, having reviewed the motion and the attachments as well as the court file, and being fully advised of the premises it is: + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to continue is granted thereby mooting the remaining motions. + +Under the circumstances of this unusual and relatively complex case, the court finds that there are simply too many significant, lengthy motions that are pending and need to be heard prior to December 5, 2017, the date that the trial was originally scheduled to commence. The court and counsel have tried to schedule these extensive and numerous pretrial motions but due to the busy schedules of all concerned, trying to hear all of the motions between now (November 14, 2017) and prior to December 5, 2017, would cause undue strain on the part of the court and counsel. At this late juncture, not knowing how the court will rule on critical issues would require counsel to try to strategize and plan their respective cases under extreme uncertainty and duress. + +To stem this overriding concern but also taking into account the age of the case (the case's extensive appellate history is well known to the parties and will not be repeated here), the court specially sets this case Number 1 for the ten (10) day period commencing March 13, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10C. In the interim, lead counsel of record shall prepare a list of the parties' respective motions and the agreed sequence of the motions to be heard as well as the total anticipated time for argument (motion, response and rebuttal only). As to the written motions, only the motion and a response will be permitted. No reply briefs will be allowed + +absent court order. This schedule shall be prepared and presented to the court no later than noon on November 17, 2017 as the court will be on vacation during Thanksgiving week. In addition to the November 29, 2017 date already provided (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. and allowing one hour and fifteen minutes for lunch), the court is opening up December 5, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.) and December 7, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — noon) so that all pending motions (only) can be heard. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14th day of November, 2017. + +![](_page_5_Picture_2.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +## Copies furnished to: + +- Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) James (brad@pathtojustice 1.7 Fred Haddad (haddadfm@aol.com) 17 John Scarola (mep@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN, JR (JACKER +- KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH (KBROCK@FLACIVILLAW COM) F7 Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) F7 Matthew D Weissing (mptt@pathtojustice.com) +- **Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@tlappellatelaw.com)** +- **PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COM)** +- service©jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrial.com) +- Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) +- William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- William Chester , Jr. (wcblaw@aol.com) 17 William B.. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) +- John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) +- Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com) +- Angela Many (angela@linkrocklaw.com) + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com)** + +▪ **John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com)** + +**Fred Haddad (Dee@fredhaddadlaw.com)** + +**James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com)** + +**Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com)** + +**tr, NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**fr, JaymeMi Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) A ,** + +**Fred Haddad (fredhaddad@fredhaddadlaw.com) IZ7** + +**Andrew A Harris arh@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**• Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com)** + +**• John R. Beranek aberanek@ausley.com)** + +**F7 (staff.efile@pathtojustice.c** + +**)** ▪ **Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com** + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (kara@linkrocklaw.com)** + +**• NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com)** + +**• Angela M. Many (tanya@linkrocklaw.com** + +**Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.** + +**• Kara Berard Rockenbach (troy@lInkrocklaw.com)** + +**• W ChesterM Jr (wcblawasst@gmall.com)** + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. and L M, individually, Defendant(s). individually, + +## CO S ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on July 6, 2O17 on Counter-Plaintiff, J. , Motion to Set Cause for Trial and the Court's Motion to Determine Nee or Discovery/Motion Scheduling Order and the court having reviewed the Motion, heard argument and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 5, 2O17, at 9:30 a.m., (1O days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 2O5 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 334O1. + +## II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses.of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - 1. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and +- 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. + +D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall confer and: + +- 1. discuss settlement; +- 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; +- 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; +- 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. + +E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the dc; )\*counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + +- 1. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubed Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. +- 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; +- 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; +- 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; +- 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; +- 6. a statement of estimated trial time; +- 7. names of attorneys to try case; +- 8. ia1 umber of peremptory challenges per party; and ,, . &al ti party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to pporting authority, as schedules attached to the Stipulation. + +F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. + +G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. + +## H. DISCOVERY. Unless permitted by court order, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR TRIAL. ABSENT A TRUE EMERGENCY, FAILURE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR CONTINUANCE. + +- I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pretrial conference. +- J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to trial, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +- K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +- L. PREMARICING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. +- M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than trial, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +#### III. MEDIATION + +- d +- 1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. +- 2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE, all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. +- 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. +- 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing a lTO SERVE WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST AND REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.09(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, move this Court for an enlargement of time to serve his Witness List, Expert List and Exhibit List pursuant to the Trial Order dated April 15, 2010 and requests a status conference and states as follows: + +- 1. On or about December 7, 2009, Plaintiff filed and served the Complaint on the Defendants in the above-styled cause. +- 2. On or about April 15, 2010, this Court issued a trial order in the above-styled cause setting this case for jury trial on the eight-week docket beginning October 25, 2010. 2 The trial order has a 120 day deadline requiring the parties' disclosure of the names of witnesses, expert names and addresses and a list of all trial exhibits. The deadline to file the disclosures was June 17, 2010. + +3. On or about June 11, 2010, a Stipulation and Substitution of undersigned counsel's Firm was filed and an Order granting said stipulation and substitution was entered by this Court on or about the same day. + +4. Plaintiff and his counsel has been advised that there may be in excess of 6,000 or more emails and/or other documents from the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") which is currently in bankruptcy. Plaintiff served a subpoena duces tecum on the Trustee for RRA on or about April 10, 2010 seeking documents from RRA. Plaintiff has been attempting to obtain this discovery since that date, but has not been able to do so because the Trustee for RRA has filed a Motion for Protective Order. A privilege log will need to filed with this Court and served on the parties before any documents may be produced. Afterwards, the depositions of key witnesses will take place. + +5. Further, there is a pending Motion to Vacate Default entered against Rothstein which if granted, will make this case no longer at issue. + +6. Based on the, the Plaintiff requests an enlargement of time to serve his witness disclosures, expert disclosures and trial exhibits in this case up to and including August 6, 2010. The Plaintiff requests a status conference on or betbre that date to determine when the case will actually be ready for trial. + +7. The undersigned counsel certifies that this Motion is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay. + +8. An enlargement of time to file Plaintiff's witness disclosure and list of exhibits until + +August 6, 2010 will not prejudice the parties, but not permitting such an extension will prejudice the Plaintiff. + +9. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has contacted counsel for the parties and will continue to do so in an effort to resolve this matter without the need of a hear 2 ..," g. . + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby respectfully requests thisto? grant his \* enlargement of time for Plaintiff to serve his witness disclosures, expert diselostues, and list of trial \.1....) exhibits up to and including August 6, 2010 and further request for a s is onference on or before 'S)) that date for the reasons set forth above. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 7 day + +of July, 2010 to + +=, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Scuola, Esq. C O + +AS + +ACi C)r ) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. ( S" Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By + +odney J. Janis, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No. 647896 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. + +901 Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761058/EFTA02761058.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761058/EFTA02761058.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..320642733e116898e8871e42d97226c26a84f533 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761058/EFTA02761058.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761058.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4473, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.64599999999996, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 539.472900390625, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 539.472900390625, + 128.97802734375 + ], + [ + 290.64599999999996, + 128.97802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIM-11>TO SERVE \nWITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST AND REQUEST FOR \nSTATUS CONFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.514, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.7519836425781, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.7519836425781, + 356.238037109375 + ], + [ + 143.514, + 356.238037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761058" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..433bef129aa4a44552852c5e6e71d128d6e70463 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.md @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. ,individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLA1NTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN EFFR Y EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MO Ali LIM I NE + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey E 'Epstein"), files his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine and states: + +#### RODUCTION + +To prevail on his Cou or malicious prosecution, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. ("Ed "), must prove that Jeffrey Epstein filed a civil proceeding against him "without prob . See Korman v. M, 821 So. 2d 408, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). buici " emus." See v. GCC Beverages. Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 1986). eposition testimony, admitted that he has no evidence of Epstein's intent and l intends to attempt to meet his burden by introducing Epstein's assertions of the Fifth Amendment in response to questions about the validity of clients' claims against Epstein. Because strategy reflects his fundamental misunderstanding of what this case + +is about and the legal significance of Epstein's assertions of the Fifth Amendment, this Court must bar from introducing this testimony. + +First, plan to re-litigate the validity of his clients' tort claims against Epstein demonstrates that he does not understand what this case is about. This case is not, and has never been, about whether or not the claims filed in 2008 against Epstein by die ts are true. Rather, this lawsuit is about whether or not Epstein lacked probable cause to alle ltimately prove) that participated in or had a connection to Rothstein and Adler's ("RRA") Ponzi scheme after joined RRA. Epstein is not a i this action, that did anything improper in regard to the conduct of the AIV — ion it after joined RRA. Epstein's claims did not "put into issue [Epstein' le responsibility for the claims brought against him" by clients (Epstein' S Sic o t Amend Complaint, D.E. 195 1 4), challenge basis for filing those c c 4%) rt , liege engaged in misconduct between the dates his clients first filed s gain pstein and the date on which joined RRA. Importantly, state not relevant! Only what Epstein knew and believed in December 2009 matters. + +Rather, the crux tin's allegations was that, after joining RRA, misused the existing at he ad previously pursued in a manner that was not unlawful, sought inflammato cry that was not relevant to clients' allegations against Epstein, filed a me attention-grabbing motion alleging fraudulent asset transfers by Epstein, and commenced (but did not serve) a duplicative lawsuit on behalf of one of his clients—all of which on its face seemed in furtherance of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The question to be tried, then, is whether, at the time he filed suit against , Epstein lacked probable cause—whether he lacked "a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to him, in the validity" of his claims founded upon apparent misconduct (and Rothstein's indisputable misconduct) while held himself out as a partner at Rothstein's firm. See v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (citation omitted). I Therefore, evidence concerning the truth or falsity of clients' tort claims, state of mind and actual motivation for doing what he did after becoming a partner at RRA, and Epstein's assertions of the Fifth endment in response to questions about those claims are not relevant to this question and sho excluded. + +Second, even if some of Epstein's assertions of the Fifth Amen relevant and this Court were to admit them into evidence, overstates a W, f this testimony. is not entitled to any presumption based on Epstein's im , and the Court should protect the jury from drawing any inference in 11rCojb solely on Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment. + +Third, introducing Epstein's repeated of the Fifth Amendment as apparently intends to do—is prejudicial reve 131e error. + +# RELEV UAL BACKGROUND? + +# Clients' Act A ainst Epstein + +Before joining ~d filed three lawsuits against Epstein. On August 13, 2008, sued E in e Southern District of Florida on behalf of Jane Doe. On September .1, 2008, Ed e led lawsuits against Epstein in the 15th Judicial Circuit on behalf of L.M. and E.W. clients alleged they flew on Epstein's plane or met Epstein's wealthy, famous, and politically connected male acquaintances. + +must also prove the other elements of his malicious prosecution Counterclaim. + +2 Epstein is filing an Appendix in support of this Motion, which he will supplement with the documents cited herein. + +joined RRA no later than April 9, 2009. At that point, the tenor of the litigation changed: + +- On April 9, 2009, Jane Doe moved to lift a protective order, which was entered in Crime Victim's Rights Act case against the United States and governed the disclosure of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, and to allow her counsel to place certain of its terms in the public record. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM D.E.32 at +- On April 17, 2009, Doe amended her complaint and filed an ei Civil RICO Case Statement. In the Case Statement, she made new and in am allegations such as: "[i]t is common belief that the sexual acts agar inors temporarily ceased in approximately November 2005 when Epstein le law enforcement authorities were investigating his crimes," but if "Epste is criminal enterprise, is given the viNand "[t]he criminal enterprise had a definite opportunity to commit similar acts inte pon his release from jail, the enterprise will likely continue this illegal structure similar to a mafia 38-1 at 6, 8, 10.) +- On April 30, 2009 g a deposition in E.W.'s case, asked Epstein outrageous and irrele questions such as, "Mr. Epstein, did you ever care about any of the feelings f girls that you were engaging in sex with?" and "Isn't it true that at the time inserting your forgers into the vagina of these little kids, all you cared about was your own sexual gratification?" (See 15th Jud. Cir. Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058- XXX X-MB D.E. 84.) +- On June 19, 2009, Doe moved for an injunction restraining Epstein's supposed fraudulent transfer of assets, the appointment of a receiver for Epstein's property, and an order y[.]" (S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM D.E. + +requiring Epstein to post a \$15 million bond. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM D.E. 165.) Judge Marra subsequently denied the motion as meritless: "'[n]o relief of this character has been thought justified in the long history of equity jurisprudence" and the "motion is entirely devoid of evidence of Defendant's alleged fraudulent transfers." (S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM D.E. 400 at 2, 3.) + +- On July 22, 2009, sent a letter to counsel representing other d Epstein victims. He said he intended to notice the depositions of Donald Bill Clinton (among others), even though none of his clients alleged she h an ection to either. +- On July 27, 2009, commenced a second actio halt"of L.M. in the Southern District of Florida. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv- D.E. 1.) L.M.'s complaint was 234 pages long and asserted 156 causes tcs, II pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 each of which carried with it a minim cS t damages award of \$150,000 (more than \$23 million in total). (Id.) The aint eged—for the first time and contrary to L.M.'s prior testimony—that Eps " rc[ed] [L.M.] into oral sex." (Id.1 12.) the sole attorney listed on plaint, has recently admitted he did not sign it himself and that he does not ho signed it. Whoever filed the complaint and commenced the action en Epste n's last name as "Espstein" in the court's electronic filing system, and the t was never served. +- st 11, 2009, noticed Donald Trump's deposition for August 18, 2009. On August 24, 2009, re-noticed Donald Trump's deposition for September 24, 2009. (S.D. Fla. Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM.) +- On August 12, 2009, E.W. moved for permission to enter and inspect Epstein's entire property. (15th Jud. Cir. Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB D.E. 143.) + +- On August 24, 2009, L.M. noticed the depositions of Epstein's pilots Paul Visoski, Jr., and David Hart Rogers. (15th Jud. Cir. Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051- XXXX-MB D.E. 159.) L.M. requested they produce "[a]11 original flight logs from January, 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets which [they] piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Max ell." (Id.) Again, none of clients alleged she flew on Epstein's plane or as laims for the periods 1998 through mid-2001 or late 2005 through 2009. + +## Pleadings & News Reports MiThe Scope Of Ito n zi Scheme And The Central Role Of Cases + +In November and December 2009, RRA imploded; criminal and civil pleadings and news reports revealed to the public the breathtaking scope of o ei 's Ponzi scheme; and Rothstein's investors, in a complaint against Rothstein and • ews coverage, accused Rothstein and \ -Ctd others of using RRA's cases against Epstet wa ' cases against Epstein—in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Specifically: + +- On November 3, 2009, Florida Sun-Sentinel reported that "Rothstein attracted investors by promising returns and selling settlements he said he'd reached in sex discriminati an w istle-blower cases[.]" Sally Kestin, Jon Burstein & Brittany Wall c othstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true, S. Fla. Sun-S v. 3, 2009.3 The article quoted Alan Sakowitz, who said, "I was convinced it I a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake settlements[.]" Id. Sakowitz also told the Sun-Sentinel + +3 Available at http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-11-03/news/sfl-rothstein-investment-plan-Ilsbnov03\_1\_scott-rothstein-stuart-rosenfeldt-firm. + +that "Rothstein boasted of having sophisticated eavesdropping equipment and that former cops would sift through potential defendants' garbage." + +- On November 6, 2009, the New Times Broward-Palm Beach reported that, "[o]ne way" Rothstein enticed investors "was by tricking [them] into believing that his firm was representing numerous underaged girls who had sex with Palm Beach bill'onaire and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein." Bob Norman, Scott Rothst e Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy, New Times Broward-Palm Beac 2009.4 The article said that "Rothstein claimed that he had flight logs o hat Epstein flew extremely prominent people, including former President President ' Clin n, on his private jet with some of the plaintiffs" and that Rothstein "told 19(T • k) t Epstein, Clinton, and other celebrities involved basically had no choi u the these cases and that it was a veritable treasure-trove." Id. The N c iloc i d that investors "then ponied up millions to invest in the settlements, pay o porn of those settlements to the victims, and pocket the rest," but Rothstein w ' mg the story" and there was "no indication that the former president, who e time a real friend of Epstein's, and other celebrity names bandied about by m were involved in any way." Id. Rothstein "'used the [Epstein case] as a , as bait,' said [William Scherer, an attorney for a number of Rothstein invgs That's the way he raised all the money. He would use legitimate casts as bait g investors into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there.'" Id. + +4 Available at http://www.browardpalmbeach.cominews/scott-rothstein-the-jeffrey-epstein-andbill-clinton-ploy-6471700. + +- On November 9, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a civil forfeiture action against certain property of Rothstein. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ D.E. I.) The complaint said Rothstein "and others" had been operating a Ponzi scheme since 2005. (Id. 1 13.) It alleged that Rothstein had sold investors interests in non-existent structured settlements. (Id. ¶¶ 14-15.) +- On November 12, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported that It] o firmed Thursday what many have speculated since the Scott Rothstein : The flashy lawyer could not have defrauded investors of hundreds of mil ons ut help. 'I do not believe that this was a one-man show,' said John and Gillies 5 o e FBI in South Florida." Sally Kestin Peter Franccschina, FBI doubts o t ran a Ponzi scheme alone, S. \6 Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 12, 2009.5 +- On November 20, 2009, certain inves thstein and others. The plaintiffs alleged Rothstein had operated a Ponzi me mid fabricated structured settlements, which he sold to investors. (17th J No 062009CA062943AXXXCE D.E. 3 1 2.) The plaintiffs alleged "the p settlements, albeit fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by including, specifically, one of MF cases against Epstein: + +One oft tlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epste. mous billionaire fmancier. In fact, RRA did have inside infi due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil c.ase Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, pending in the Southern District of Florida. tatives of D3 were offered "the opportunity" to invest in a pm-suit \$3I s 10,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set of operative facts as the Jane Doe case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff. See e-mail dated October 6, 2009 referencing Epstein which is attached hereto and incorporate[d] herein as Exhibit "B." To augment his concocted story Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case + +\$ Available at http:// http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-11-12/livefil-rothstein-associates-20091112 l rothstein-rosenfeldt-adler-scott-rothstein-alan-sakowitz. + +files in Jane Doe in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard Epstein's private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered \$200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein di4not yet know about.... + +Additionally, Rothstein used RRA's representation in the Epstein ursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation, but pote jail eficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. For instance, RRA n y pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Eps t k with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age i en re on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappro ttempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effo r Rothstein's lies. + +(Id. 99 40-41.) Like the FBI, the investors i g r Ponzi scheme cannot be operated without insider help. Plaintiffs believe c S in onal members of RRA, including its nonlawyer investigators, were used b thst to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ 103.) + +- On November 23, 200 the dited States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed an an d civil asset forfeiture complaint against Rothstein's property. The Govenun gain leged that Rothstein "and others" had been running a Ponzi scheme. + - (S. e No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ D.E. 14.) +- ember 23, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported that Rothstein had said "karma is going to get him, but it's going to get other people, too. 'You're in a town full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at that.'" Brittany + +Wallman, Scott Rothstein: "You're in a town full of thieves", S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 23, 2009.6 + +- On November 24, 2009, The Miami Herald reported that "Rothstein's law firm generated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70-lawyer firm had a payroll of \$18 million, prosecutors said. Rothstein, who owned half of Rothstein Rosenfeldt dler, used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they sai Weaver & Scott Hiaasen, Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries 'The Miami Herald, Nov. 24, 2009. +- On November 25, 2009, Rothstcin's investors filed an complaint against him, in which they repeated their allegations concerning le cases played in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. (See 17th Jud. C . 062009CA062943AXXXCE D.E. ( \ I 12.) +- On November 27, 2009, the U ' StatS Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a second vil asset forfeiture complaint against Rothstein's property. Once again, overnment alleged that Rothstein "and others" had been running a Ponzi (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ D.E. 19.) +- On Dece 1, 2 r i 9, the FBI arrested Rothstein and the United States Attorney's Office forth Sou em District of Florida filed a criminal information against him. (S.D. Fla. . 0:09-cr-60331-JIC D.E. 1.) The information alleged that RRA was a criminal enterprise; that, from 2005 until November 2009, Rothstein and others had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity that included mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and + +6 Available at http://www.sun-sentinel.comisfl-mtblog-2009-11-scott\_rothstein\_havent\_i\_hurtstory.html. + +conspiracy to launder money; that Rothstein and his unidentified co-conspirators had operated a Ponzi scheme and obtained \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud; and that Rothstein and his co-conspirators had "created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements," and "made false statements to current investors in order to convince them to re-invest in additional purported confidential settlement agreements." (Id. ¶¶ 2-4, 6, 21, 23.) + +## Epstein Sues Based On The Information In The Public Rgrd + +On December 7, 2009, Epstein sued , Rothstein, and L.M. fouhketeering, abuse of process, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, and violating the Flo ' C emedies for Criminal Practices Act. (15th Jud. Cir. Case No. 50-2009-CA-0 a t. X X-M B D.E. 5.) Epstein's complaint was informed by and referenced, cited to ASr .,c ,4 the facts, pleadings, and reports set forth above. (Id. See also 15th Jud. Cir. C '\4 o. -2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB D.E. 93199 5-13.) As Epstein explained in a t motion to amend: + +It is the essence of the Pla against Epstein or fabri return on investment o on that the Defendants used actual lawsuits to market investments to third parties for a in Cases. + +[It] [i]s not the in n or position of the Plaintiff to ut into issue whether or not the actions alle nst Epstein by various I clients] are true or not. Instead, th sence f the complaint is to focus on the alleged misconduct of filing legal m. d other actions in pursuit of civil litigation unrelated to the merits or va cases brought against [Epstein]. + +(15th J ase No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB D.E. 195 at 2-3.) + +## Dis overt' Establishes Additional Connections Between Rothstein, And Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme + +testified that, when he joined RRA, he gave up his interest in the lawsuits filed against Epstein to the firm's equity partners, i.e., Rothstein and Rosenfeldt. Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 338:10-339:7.) Rothstein subsequently "gained access" to discovery that + +obtained in his three cases against Epstein and "used it to support his fairytale[.]" Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 163:20-164:14.) In fact, knew Rothstein had requested these discovery files. Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 321:14-19.) claimed he was told Rothstein wanted the files because he intended to try the cases against Epstein with ( ' Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 321:20-322:2.) + +testified that he discussed with Rothstein "legal issues related case[s]" against Epstein and that they had conversations about the cases covered a tomey-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine. ( Mar. 23, 20 2:7-16, 116:21- 117:3.) also testified that he corresponded with and so instructions from Russ Adler—identified by Rothstein as one of his co-conspi 4)i4 . Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 259:22-260:22; Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 24• t, attended at least one of Epstein's depositions. ( ' Mar. 23, 2010, Tr. at 1:1.) and Adler also met with other attorneys at RRA to discuss the ' ove sought from and investigation into Epstein. Oct. 10, 2013, Tr. at 20 + +also testified t et with Rothstein and Adler to discuss the Epstein cases. Mar. 23, 2010, r23:15-125:5.) This testimony squares with a document produced in this case show' I,I c that R thstein was scheduled to attend an "Epstein conference" the week of July 26,200 + +ally, Rothstein testified that he spoke with and Adler about the Epstein cases. (Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 23:24-24:13.) He testified that he knew he could use the Epstein cases for his Pont scheme based on his conversations with, among others, Adler and (Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 25:12-19, 52:5-53:7.) Indeed, Rothstein testified that he "remember[ed] speaking to [ ] at least briefly the day or the day of [sic] or the day before the actual investor's due diligence was going on as to what was going on." (Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 25:20-26:1.) + +Likewise, in the investors' case against him, Rothstein testified that he socialized with and was not sure would have turned him in if he had discovered the Ponzi scheme. (Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 61:15-62:6.) He also testified that " ither Brad or Russ Adler pointed out to me that one of the pieces of evidence they ing in the actual case was the flight manifest. And I actually used that to m I big show." (Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 59:14-25)7 After confirming the • anifests that were in evidence in "the real case" did not have sensational names o continued: + +[I]es interesting you bring that up because the wa Prince Andrew was Mr. Adler and Mr. that the reason the case — when we were dis it was becoming so, quote, unquote, tasty, [Epstein] had been flying Bill Clinton piece that was missing from the real with Bill Clinton and e on different occasions actual real case, the reason use they had information that Prince Andrews [sic] around, the e connection to the young girls. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 60 Prince Andrew were concernedC Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 61:6-9.) According to Rothstein, "as far as" Clinton and Pon to the young girls "was fiction[.]" (Rothstein's + +#### C. EPSTEIN'S TO THE PREC AD RI NDIVIENT ASSERTION IS INADMISSIBLE PURSUANT A EVIDENCE CODE OR, AT A MINIMUM, SHOULD BE A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THERE IS NO NEGATIVE OR SUMPTION FROM INVOKING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL + +#### 1. EE ein's constitutional right to invoke the Fifth Amendment is inadmissible because it is irrelevant pursuant section 90.401, Florida Statutes. + +None of the topics on which Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment arc relevant to the only issues in this action of Epstein's damages caused by Rothstein or whether Epstein had probable + +See also Rothstein's Dec. 19, 2011, Tr. at 2278:13-20 (Rothstein testifying that he asked either Adler or to "isolate the flight manifest" for use with prospective investors). + +cause when he sued . Therefore, any prior testimony or evidence in which Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment must be excluded pursuant to section 90.401. Additionally, should not be permitted to ask Epstein similar irrelevant questions at trial that would expectantly lead to Epstein's assertion of his constitutional right. + +The sole issues to be tried in this action arc: (a) the amount of damages that Rothstein should pay Epstein; and (b) whether the underlying lawsuit against .S can prove Epstein lacked probabl for filing malicious prosecution trim is limited to an analysis of the civil proceeding filed by Epstein against Edwards n hich relate to the merits of the cases filed by clients against Epstein. only allege that , after he went to RRA unnecessary discovery, filed a federal lawsuit solel i r took other steps such as alleging fraudulent t till hs" d asking for a \$15 million bond that were perceived by Epstein to support a sche s de d investors that came to RRA. Significantly, Epstein's claims did not apply to ti 'ocl before joined RRA as a partner and do not apply to the cases filed in 2 8 a t Epstein. The sole issue here is what did in the Epstein cases to incite in while was a partner at RRA; not whether the tort claims m's claims pled against e litigation process by taking se of mollifying investors, and + +8The elements of malicious prosecution in Florida include: "(1) the commencement or continuance of an original judicial proceeding; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant against the present plaintiff who was the defendant in the original proceeding; (3) its bona fide termination in favor of the present plaintiff; (4) a lack of probable cause for such proceeding; (5) the presence of malice; and (6) damages conforming to legal standards resulting to the present plaintiff .... If the plaintiff is unable to prove any one of these elements, the malicious prosecution action will fail." Endacott v. Intl Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (citing Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1366 (Fla. 1994)). + +Despite this distinction, throughout discovery and during pretrial preparations, it has become increasingly obvious that seeks to create a many-ringed circus of mini-trials within one trial in an effort to detract from the issue of whether Epstein had probable cause to have a reasonable belief that an RRA partner, was involved in or connected to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The 2008 filed tort claims are over. While may or may got like the resolution of those claims, this malicious prosecution action simply is not the fo relitipte the tort claims or the allegations in the 2008 Epstein cases. Indeed, contrary ' argument, whether or not the allegations in those cases are true, or not, is not he issues for this trial. Likewise, the true motivation behind likewise not relevant. doing wh c ) d' de a partner at RRA is + +#### 2. In addition to being irrelevant to any ma of his Fifth Amendment right is inadmiss t SI4F a< Qin this case, Epstein's assertion ba ed on its prejudicial effect. + +Any prior testimony and other e Nating to Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment must also be excludedj5erny remote or minimal probative value is clearly outweighed by the danger of ut p t) ce, confusion of issues, and the risks of misleading the jury. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. " Thing the probative value against the unfair prejudice, it is proper for the court c con o de the need for the evidence; the tendency of the evidence to suggest an improper b • to jury for resolving the matter, e.g., an emotional basis; the chain of inference to establish the material fact; and the effectiveness of a limiting instruction." n, 162 So. 3d 360, 365 (Fla. 46 DCA 2015) (quoting v. State, 40 So. 3d 883, 886 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2010)). + +In , the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that evidence of the defendant's postaccident bad acts could have inflamed the jury and caused them to award damages to the plaintiff out of a desire to punish the defendant. Id. at 366. See also v. State, 19 So. 3d 277, 296 + +(Fla. 2009) ("Unfair prejudice has been described as an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one. ... This rule of exclusion is directed at evidence which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.") (citations and internal quotations omitted); Stewart v. Draleaus, 226 So. 3d 990, 996 (Fla. 41° DCA 2017) (recognizing the inflammatory effects of evidence of a party's alcohol use in th context of an action arising from a car accident, and holding such evidence inadmissible as untlsl rejudicial where liability is admitted) (citing Neering v. 390 So. 2d 742, 7 . th DCA 1980)); Datus v. State, 126 So. 3d 363, 365 (Fla. 4i° DCA 2013) (explainin ny which evokes sympathy for a victim may be inadmissible on the ground that Acy • outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice.") value is substantially + +Allowing to use the portions of an n tioning to which Epstein asserted the Fifth Amendment or to ask questions • itably lead to the assertion of the Fifth Amendment would be unfairly prejudic\* nfi the issues, invoke the jury's emotions, and/or mislead the jury from the true iss action. Because of the nature of the claims against Epstein in these other cases, en structing the jury on the actual elements of malicious prosecution or giving a instruction would not stop the jury from being misled and/or confused, resulti only ne emotional conclusion of finding against Epstein based on Epstein being ac o er case) of sexual molestation of a minor. See Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., So. 2d 639, 650-51 (Fla. 41h DCA 2008) (describing the balancing test under Fla. Stat. § 90.403 as follows: "In weighing the claim of unfair prejudice against probative value, the trial court is required to consider the need for the evidence, the tendency of the evidence to suggest to the jury an improper basis for resolving the matter, the chain of inference necessary to establish the material fact, and the effectiveness of a limiting instruction"). + +#### 3. In the unlikely judicial determination allowing testimony or evidence of Epstein's invocation of his constitutional Fifth Amendment right, this testimony should he preceded by an instruction that there is no negative or adverse inference from doing SO. + +If the Court does not exclude Epstein's prior testimony asserting the Fifth Amendment, the Court should instruct the jury that there is no negative or adverse inference they should draw from Epstein's constitutional right to remain silent. Courts have consistently held tha ere is no requirement to draw a negative inference from the assertion of the Fifth In re Carp, 340 F. 3d 15, 23 (id Cir. 2003); Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 ex reL Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F. 3d 1258, 1264 (9th Cir. 2000 pri ege. See 976). In Doe inth Circuit held that: + +The Baxter holding is not a blanket rule that allows a from invocations of the privilege against self-incri in the civil context. Rather, lower courts inter!) t suggesting that the key to the Baxter holding,iSth u be drawn when independent evidence ex to answer . . . Thus, an adverse infere by independent evidence of the fa cannot be drawn when, for exam in a complaint. In such ins support the fact under inq evidence to support permitted. See LaSalle ferences to be drawn der all circumstances er have been uniform in adverse inference can only he ct to which the party refuses drawn when silence is countered g estioned, but that same inference ilen is the answer to an allegation contained n there is no corroborating evidence to ponent of the fact must come forward with , otherwise no negative inference will be F.3d at 391. + +rt 232 F.3d at 1264 (citatioa ' ed). The Fo parties to "w Frase IstrictCourt of Appeal has similarly limited such adverse inferences against y refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them..." Inv. Corp., 615 So. 2d 841, 842 (Fla. 41° DCA 1993) (emphasis added); see also Coquina Investments v. 7D Bank, NA, 760 F. 3d 1300, 1310 (1ld' Cir. 2014) (holding that "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties ... when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them") (quoting Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976)). Likewise, another court has held that "[b]ecause the + +privilege is constitutionally based, the competing interests of the party asserting the privilege and the party against whom the privilege is asserted must be carefully balanced and the detriment to the party asserting it should be no more than is necessary to prevent unfair and unnecessary prejudice to the other side. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Richards, 541 F. 3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2008). + +The Nationwide court also recognized that: + +under certain circumstances ... an adverse inference from an assertion privilege not to reveal information is too high a price to pay. The tension betw n one party's Fifth Amendment rights and the other party's right to a air proceeding is resolved by analyzing each instance where the adverse inferenc( was drawn, or not drawn, on a case-by-case basis under the microscope of a ircurnstances of that particular civil litigation. The inference may not be dra "u less there is a substantial need for the information and there is no the ess burdensome way of obtaining that information." The district cou determine 'whether the value of presentlingi the evidence list su t t outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice' to the party ass th privilege. Moreover, the inference may be drawn only when there is jM t evidence of the fact about which the party refuses to testify. + +Id. at 912 (citations omitted and emphasis a + +Similarly, the topics on which to any material issue in this law , no adverse inference should be permitted under Fraser. asserted the Fifth Amendment are not responsive Epstein's claims against Edwar re never about the merit of the tort cases that filed against Epstein prio s irto g RRA. Moreover, to permit adverse inferences may actually be contrary to o evi ce obtained during discovery. For instance, at his deposition, Epstein asserted tll mendment when asked, "[d]id sexual assaults ever take place on a private airplane oilyvhich you were a passenger." wants to present this testimony to convince the jury that Epstein may have, in fact, known of such sexual assaults, even though himself admitted that he took depositions of three pilots who had, at various times, flown Epstein and his passengers, despite knowledge that none of his clients had testified that any improper conduct occurred on airplanes. See ' Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 166:10-22 (admitting that if his clients testified truthfully, they admitted that there was no improper conduct on airplanes).9 + +As another example, one of Epstein's allegations in his Complaint against was that abused the litigation process when he attempted to take discovery in the tort lawsuits from well-known individuals in an attempt to force a higher settlement (in accordance with the false representations that RRA was making to investors). When asked about r he ever socialized with these celebrities in the presence of females under the age invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege. Again, will try to use this a ion that he did so at trial to negate the probable cause shown by un •ftga n tactics. See Epstein's March 17, 2010 Tr. at 93:18-95:14 (Bill ,; 93< ) (David Copperfield); 91:20— 92:4 (Bill Mottola); 90:3-7 (Alan Dershowitz) S h , + +Similarly, under the Nationwide anal ; • %"eslc , ould be no adverse inference because the value (if any) of an adverse inference o to ' to the malicious prosecution counterclaim is substantially outweighed by the fair prejudice to Epstein, as set forth above. Again, whether or not Epstein has p ors for prostitution, whether he ever had physical contact with clients in pstein cases, or whether sexual assaults took place on private airplanes while h a pafsenger, have nothing to do with whether or not can meet his burden to p • icious prosecution counterclaim against Epstein. cannot meet his burden entitlement to an adverse inference. + +9 All three pilots ultimately also testified that there was no such conduct on any flights that they were on. + +#### 4. If any Fifth Amendment testimony is admitted, it should be preceded by a iury instruction that the invocation of this constitutional right should not create a negative or adverse presumption. + +If the Court decides to permit this evidence, and to permit adverse inferences, the Court should make it clear to the jury that adverse inferences are not the same as admissions or presumptions. Courts have clearly distinguished between the two. For instance, i9 Palmas Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 881 So. 2d 565, 582 (Fla. 3d court held that "an inference, unlike a presumption, is "[a] logical and fact not presented by direct evidence but which, by process of logic conclude exists from the established facts." 004), the onclusion of trier of fact may + +cannot solely rely on Epstein's assertion e lf Amendment as an admission or presumption on elements that must prov a on his malicious prosecution claim, such as lack of probable cause. Coquina Inv ( S 8%i 6 , Rothstein, No. 10-60786-CIV, 2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) is r'L'cul iiie instructive. In Coquina, the plaintiffs made , Scott Rothstein, and sued TD Bank for allegedly aiding and abetting Rothstein's ud. At trial, the plaintiff called TD Bank's former regional vice president as a witness, w ed his Fifth Amendment privilege to questions regarding his role in the Rothstein ltd. Th court instructed the jury that, "Mr. Spinosa's assertion of his Fifth Amendment e . . . is not a proper basis for finding TD Bank liable in this case," and that the the privilege (and any adverse inferences from it) could only be considered by the jury "in conjunction with other evidence to be presented." Id. at \*9. On post-verdict motions, the court confirmed that, "[a] jury can only draw an adverse inference against a party as to a particular fact when independent evidence exists of the fact to which the party refuses to answer. In other words, a judgment cannot rest solely on the adverse inference." Id. at \*10. investments in 2009 with + +Other courts' holdings are consistent with the reasoning from the Coquina court. The Seventh Circuit has held, citing Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976), that an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege must be "weighed in light of other evidence rather than leaving directly and without more to the conclusion of guilt or liability." LaSalle Bank Lake View v. Seguban, 54 F. 3d 387 (71° Cir. 1995). Likewise, in National Acceptance Co. ofi America v. Bathalter, 705 F. 2d 924, 930 (7th Cir. 1963), the Seventh Circuit held that the fairftert9 answer the allegations of a civil complaint based on an assertion of the Fifth Ame ptivil 7le () ege could not be construed as an admission of those allegations. See also Cent t ns. Co. v. Nappi, 56 F. Supp. 222, 228 (N.D. N.Y. 1997) ("An adverse inference Ac, ' tt party invoking the Fifth Amendment by itself is insufficient to establish the absen a uine issue of material fact"). + +Here, intends to ask the jury to dra n e or adverse presumption based on Epstein's assertion of his constitutional right t ilisin , dent. At his deposition on November 10, 2017, admitted that he had ide of Epstein's state of mind or the facts and circumstances known to Epstein re bable cause to file his Complaint other than Epstein himself. See Nov. 10 017 r. at 276:24 — 278:15. Given his lack of evidence, is trying to rely on E To• ' invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination in er to tspel Epstein's probable cause for having a reasonable belief that ov lous litigation tactics as an RRA partner indicated that was involved with s Ponzi scheme. See Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 227:13-229:13 ( testifying that he argued Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment as an admission in a federal action and stating "that's going to happen in this case, too.'). + +Clearly, Epstein's exercise of his right to remain silent has nothing to do with his perception and reasonable belief that actions were connected to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and + +investor-luring. Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, No. 10-60786-CIV, 2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) and other similar cases have made it clear that invocation of the Fifth Amendment cannot be the sole basis for a verdict or judgment. As a result, if this Court concludes that Epstein's Fifth Amendment assertions has some relevance to burden of proving Epstein had no probable cause to believe involvement with RRA partner Rot tein, then any admission of this testimony must be preceded by an instruction to avoid onfusion, emotional conclusion, or misleading from the true issues for their determ + +## B. THIS COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE CERTAIN OF THE EkINWTS IDENTIFIED ON TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST. + +#### 1. The Exhibits Should Be Excluded Pursuant To F tatute Sections 90.401 and 90.403. + +The vast majority of the exhibits identified identified ds' November 7, 2017, Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1043) should be excluded (b s hare m irrelevant to the case at hand pursuant to Florida Statute section 90.401. To th tent could argue that any of the exhibits are relevant, any alleged "probative I i ubstantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issu ding the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative c p evidence." § 90.403, Fla. i , bDailey , v. Multicon Dev., Inc., 417 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). "'Unfair improper b direct dice' as been described as 'an undue tendency to suggest decision on an only, though not necessarily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is nee which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.' v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). See also Canales v. Compania De Vapores Realma, S.A., 564 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (holding any probative value of testimony about marriage proposal plaintiff purportedly made offering money to woman to marry him so that he could avoid deportation, on issue of plaintiffs credibility, was far outweighed by its prejudicial effect); DeSantis v. Acevedo, 528 So. 2d 461 (Fla. + +3d DCA 1988) (finding probative value of the defendant's cross-examination of the plaintiff and his main witness about prior unrelated incidents that insinuated that both the plaintiff and the witness had been dishonest was outweighed by prejudicial nature of questions). + +For instance, identifies an Amazon receipt for a purchase of an erotic book (Exhibit 4), sex offender registrations (Exhibits 63 and 131), a massage table (Exhibit 59), messages from a notepad in Epstein's home (Exhibits 7, 28, 91), flight logs (Ex 51, 52, 87-90, 122), phone records (Exhibits 10, 11), photos and videos of Epstei ;:' i) (Exhibits 16, 42, 43) and school records and yearbooks from the plaintiffs in the 1 rich filed against Epstein (Exhibits 23-26 and 96). None of these are probable cause for filing his claims against or an ml malicious prosecution. Similarly, lists j ' 1%4Xrecords (Exhibit 12), probation records (Exhibits 13 and 62), probable cause t i d search warrants (Exhibits 14, 17, 27, 44), victim statements (Exhibit 15), an er ments relating to the plaintiffs in lawsuits against Epstein (Exhibits 6 , 97, 99) and Epstein's criminal cases (Exhibits 29- 31, 48-50, 57-58, 60-61, 64, 7 4,, 7 9, 100, 102-105, 119). Again, none of these are relevant to the elements in Edwar cious prosecution counterclaim. hether Epstein lacked Counterclaim for + +These area exam es. On November 15, 2017, Epstein filed his Objections to Amended E ibit ist (D.E. 1058) identifying all of the exhibits which Epstein claims are irrelevant to Florida Statute section 90.401 (indicated by "3" under the objections column) and which are unfairly prejudicial, misleading to the jury and confusing pursuant to Florida Statutes section 90.403 (indicated by "4" under the objection column). All of these should be excluded. + +inclusion of these exhibits on his Amended Exhibit List, as well as others that fall into these categories, demonstrates that goal in this litigation is to re-litigate his prior cases against Epstein, which have already settled, and to try this case based on prejudicial and inflammatory allegations which have no bearing on the malicious prosecution counterclaim. + +#### 2. Exhibits Relating to Prior Convictions and Criminal Matters Shiu Excluded. + +Certain exhibits on Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1043) sho o excluded as it is well-settled law that evidence of prior convictions, acquittals or e i irrelevant in a civil action and thus inadmissible. Eggers v. Hardware Co., 8 S . 2d 507 (Fla. 1956); Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 198• ch, Epstein's conviction, as well as any testimony or evidence of any other cri m igation, is inadmissible. This includes, for example, documents relating to E ft ,hi e 30, 2008 conviction (Exhibits 30, 103, 104), his criminal plea colloquy (Ex P\l'" 3 ,57-58), the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office's criminal file for Epstein (Ex robable cause affidavits (Exhibits 14, 44), reports from the Palm Beach Police xhibits 48-50, 105), grand jury subpoenas (Exhibit 76), a criminal score sheet (Exhibi , probation records (Exhibit 62), property searches and surveillance (Exhili 79, 0, 102), and other exhibits identified on Amended Exhibit List that relate a inal investigation and proceedings. Again, these are just examples. + +## 3. its Should be Excluded as Inadmissible Hearsay. + +In on to being irrelevant, many of the exhibits listed above are inadmissible hearsay. The documents which Epstein alleges contain hearsay are identified by the number "7" in the objection column of his Objections to Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1058). "Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." § 90.801(c), Fla. Stat. (2014). In fact, many of these documents contain double hearsay, so that even if could establish an exception for the first layer of hearsay, the documents still contain inadmissible hearsay. Many of these documents contain contents that are entirely based upon prior statements made by individuals and other extrinsic documents; all of which undeniably do not fall into an exception. See Reichenberg v.M, 846 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). "The problem here is that, in both orts, the authors simply related the substance of what the witnesses had told the authors. witness's statements, even though contained within the business records, do not fal e exception, because they were not based upon the personal knowledge of an a o 'business." Id. at 1234; see also Harris v. Game and Fresh Water Fish Corn 'n, 4 o 06, 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Van Zant v. State, 372 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 1st Accordingly, any hearsay documents, and any reference or testimony related l .bil l y uld be excluded. + +## 4. Certain Exhibits Should Be Exclud issible Opinion Testimony. + +Other documents on the ME/ AAsEe d r ibit List (D.E. 1043), identified by the number "6" in objections column of s • bjection (D.E. 1058), irrefutably contain opinion statements about Epstein who i~pa Co, and possible witness in, this case, rendering it improper opinion testimony about ibility of a witness. Alvarado v. State, 521 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In C ers v. tate, 936 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), the court was faced with a similar issue denying the admission of the information/documents, avowed: + +> ission of the notice would have been similar to admitting an opinion by the tate concerning Junior's character, truthfulness, and credibly. Such opinion testimony regarding a witness' reputation for truthfulness us clearly inadmissible. See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205, 1213-14 (Fla. 1980) (holding improper a question of a witness which sought "to elicit the individual and personal view of the witness."); v. State, 575 So.2d, 1321, 1322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that it was reversible error to admit testimony of police officers and teacher that sexual abuse victim was truthful. "A witness invades the jury's exclusive province when that witness gives his or her personal views of the credibility of another witness."); Alvarado v. State, 521 + +So.2d 180, 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (holding that an opinion of a witness concerning his or her belief as to the truthfulness of another witness clearly inadmissible."); v. State, 818 So.2d 432, 451 (Fla. 2002) (holding that it was improper to allow personal opinion to establish, reputation for truthfulness without laying a foundation based on knowledge of the witness' reputation in community for truthfulness); Wyatt v. State, 578 So.2d 811, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that section 90.405, Florida Statutes, does not permit opinion testimony regarding evidence of character); Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 405.2 at 258 ("Opinion testimony, concerning a person's character has traditionally been inadmissible on the basis that it is too unreliable; i ill be tainted by the underlying prejudice and bias, of the person exp opinion on expressing the opinion.'). + +Id. at 595-96. + +A' O eS + +#### 5. Exhibits Should Be Excluded For Other Reasons As Well.14/ ) + +Other exhibits are overbroad and vague, so that the also be excluded. At least some of the overbroad exhibits are identified by "1 objection column on Epstein's Objections to Amended Exhibit List. It is impossible to tell whether other exhibits arc overbroad because they are so v Fo stance, "all emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plainti e" (Exhibit 123) is so vague that Epstein cannot tell what is included, and, as ofCa wards has not provided a copy of the exhibit, so that Epstein has reserved the objecti ikewise, the flight logs are overbroad (see. e.g.. Exhibits 87- 90), as they appear t i con formation for every single flight in a particular time period. + +Finally uments should be excluded as confidential information of third parties and Epste dential financial information. These are identified, to the extent possible, by "14" in th bjections column on Epstein's Objections to ' Amended Exhibit List. (D.E. 1058.) + +#### C. THIS COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE USE OF ANY DEROGATORY ADJECTIVES WHEN REFERENCING EPSTEIN. + +Throughout this proceeding, has continually referenced Epstein by the use of provoking and offensive misnomers, such as "billionaire pedophile" or "convicted child molester." + +Such commentary is inappropriate and, at trial, would irrefutably be done solely to impermissibly "inflame[] the jury or appeal[] improperly to the jury's emotions." v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009). Such name-calling constitutes improper conduct by counsel and reversible error. Schubert v. Allstate Ins. Co., 603 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 51h DCA 1992) (defense counsel's inflammatory and improper remarks to jury about plaintiff, his witnesses and counsel warranted new trial). Improper comments by trial counsel, even when not objected to at trial, con versible error if they impair the jury's calm and dispassionate consideration of the • and result in an unfair trial. Moore v. Taylor Concrete & Supply, Inc., 553 So. Nelson v. Reliance Ins. Co., 368 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4'h DCA 19 from doing so at the outset can avoid such issues. . I' DCA 1989); preventing + +Likewise, Epstein's criminal conviction, S 84, as a registered sex offender, is inadmissible by law. Eggers v. " o ., 88 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1956); Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 4'h 198' . Epstein's conviction, as well as any testimony or evidence of any other criminal i , is inadmissible, as it is impermissibly being offered as "relevant solely to prove b er" and would unduly inflame and prejudice the minds of the jury against Epstein, Fla. Stat. As exp toC7 Id any pejorative that seeks to depict Epstein as someone culpable of numerous federal crimi s allegedly involving sexual misconduct with minor females to further his pursut case and in the Doe case. Consequently, such inapposite commentary from ab M, his counsel or his witnesses is impermissible. may choose to use. § 404(2)(a), + +## D. THIS COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE REFERENCES TO ANY CASES AGAINST EPSTEIN WHICH WERE NOT PROSECUTED BY + +While it is foreseeable that a limited amount of the information regarding prosecution of the three cases against Epstein (such as the fact that they existed) could potentially be germane to the issues in this case, it would be impermissible to use such information to impermissibly "inflame[] the jury or appeal[] improperly to the jury's emotions" or "solely to prove bad character." l=, 19 So. 3d at 277; Byrd, 26 So. 2d at 600. Moreover, any mention of or use of information from any other case is absolutely improper, as such evidence has no bearing on the malicious prosecution counterclaim and is unfairly prejudicial. Hon ell Intern., Inc. v. Guilder, 23 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2009); Long Term Care Found., In 778 So. 2d 1100, 1102-03 (Fla. 5i° DCA 2001) (allegations in a different la N •• i st defendant were not relevant and were highly prejudicial since "under section 9 , 'da Statutes, any relevance the complaint might have had was outweighed b un prejudice against the [defendant]"). "It is inconsistent with the notions of fair fo state to force a defendant to resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which S ant is not on trial." v. At!. Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4`1' DC (chi i tnding that "because the prior case was settled, none of the allegations therein w rov . + +As seen from No 017, Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1043) and Seventh Amended and Supplemental W ess 1 ' t (D.E. 1042), it is apparent that he intends to use as much information from other possible solely to impermissibly inflame the jury and appeal to the jury's emotio r sol y to prove bad character. See =, 19 So. 3d at 277; Byrd, 26 So. 2d at 600. "I oduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a confusion in the m jurors in excess of the legitimate probative effect of such evidence, if it tends to obscure rather than illuminate the true issue before the jury then such evidence should be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing Perper v. Edell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)); see also Agrofollajes, SA v. El Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence + +improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues and misleading of the jury, as the evidence and instruction concerning status as an illegal alien improperly changed the focus of the jury's attention). A trial court's discretion in determining the relevancy of evidence "is limited 4 y the rules + +of evidence and applicable case law." Thigpen v. United Parcel Set-vs., Inc., 990 . 639, 645 (Fla. 4Th DCA 2008) (citing v. State, 863 So. 2d 271, 278 (Ha. 200 v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. 4Th DCA 2006); DeVille v. te, o. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 41° DCA 2006); v. State, 911 So. 2d 1260, 1262 (F al 2005); v. State, 883 So. 2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4Th DCA 2004). "Relevant evide it 's issible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfai tIcic ' § 90.403, Fla. Stat. Here, these extrinsic cases arc not relevant to the malicio s e ton counterclaim against Epstein and are intended only to mislead the jury. + +#### E. THE COURT SHOUL EPSTEIN SETTLE SETTLEMENTS, IN NOT REPRESENTED DE TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE THAT OR SUBSEQUENT CLAIMS, SUITS, OR THE AMOUNTS THEREOF FOR PLAINTIFFS + +Pursuant to tion IIC? . ly08, Florida Statutes, le]vidence of an offer to compromise a claim which was dis validity or amount, as well as any relevant conduct or statements made in negotia eming a compromise, is inadmissible to prove liability or absence of liability for the cla or its value." § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2016). The meaning of this statute is equally clear, to wit: "[n]o evidence of settlement is admissible at trial on the issue of liability."Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Cont., Inc., 3 So. 3d 1078, 1083 (Fla. 2009). "[qt is a practical impossibility to eradicate from the jury's minds the considerations that where there has been a payment there must have been liability." City of Coral Gable v. Jordan, 186 So. 2d 60, 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) ("The public policy of this state favors amicable settlement of disputes and the avoidance of litigation. This policy is implemented by excluding evidence of an offer to compromise and a release or covenant not to sue tortfeasors.'). While the disposition of the cases that was prosecuting against Epstein on behalf of three plaintiffs may in certain limited respects be germane to this litigation, any other settlements are not. + +Furthermore, this evidence should be excluded under section 90.403, Flo tines. As seen from both Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness L •042) and his Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1043), it is apparent that he intends to information from other cases as possible solely to impermissibly "inflame[] the • or MO improperly to the jury's emotions," or "solely to prove bad character." Wri k te e, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DC S tS . y f the introduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a con e minds of the jurors in excess of the S c legitimate probative effect of such evid if i nds to obscure rather than illuminate the true issue before the jury then such evi c Id be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandra, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA I g Perper v. Edell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)). See also Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. t De Nemours & Co. Inc., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value eighs by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldo llstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicycl as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, and misleading of the jury, as the evidence and instruction concerning status as an illegal alien improperly changed the focus of the jury's attention). + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated above, and in reliance upon the applicable law cited herein, Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order in Limine precluding J. his counsel, and his witnesses from making any argument, statement, evidence, or comment, as well as precluding from use at trial, the items/witnesses/arguments listed above. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +149 t I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the ,listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-fil' o O rsuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + ++6s + +LINK & ACH, PA 1555 Ppl1n Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 Wei B ch, Florida 33401 600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: / Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iink-rocklaw.com Secondary: Troy(41inkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83f1dae94a76618293fb5395200fae077b031c18 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063/EFTA02761063.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1697 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761063.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 32, + "chars": 62935, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLA1NTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN EFFR Y EPSTEIN'S \nREVISED OMNIBUS MO Ali LIM I NE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 473.98260498046875, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 473.98260498046875, + 362.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 430.867 + ], + [ + 356.55255126953125, + 430.867 + ], + [ + 356.55255126953125, + 445.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 445.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RELEV UAL BACKGROUND?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 421.072265625, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 421.072265625, + 445.10302734375 + ], + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 445.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Clients' Act A ainst Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 337.31781005859375, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 337.31781005859375, + 473.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 473.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pleadings & News Reports MiThe Scope Of Ito n zi Scheme And \nThe Central Role Of Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 294.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 294.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Sues Based On The Information In The Public Rgrd", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 235.70999999999998 + ], + [ + 496.0874938964844, + 235.70999999999998 + ], + [ + 496.0874938964844, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Dis overt' Establishes Additional Connections Between Rothstein, \nAnd Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 619.9925079345703 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 619.9925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. EPSTEIN'S \nTO THE \nPREC \nAD \nRI \nNDIVIENT ASSERTION IS INADMISSIBLE PURSUANT \nA EVIDENCE CODE OR, AT A MINIMUM, SHOULD BE \nA JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THERE IS NO NEGATIVE OR \nSUMPTION FROM INVOKING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 567.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 567.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. EE ein's constitutional right to invoke the Fifth Amendment is inadmissible because \nit is irrelevant pursuant section 90.401, Florida Statutes.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 608.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 608.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. In addition to being irrelevant to any ma \nof his Fifth Amendment right is inadmiss \nt\nSI4F a< Qin this case, Epstein's assertion \nba ed on its prejudicial effect.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 345.6824951171875 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 345.6824951171875 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 380.9012451171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 380.9012451171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. In the unlikely judicial determination allowing testimony or evidence of Epstein's \ninvocation of his constitutional Fifth Amendment right, this testimony should he \npreceded by an instruction that there is no negative or adverse inference from doing \nSO.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 544.2891235351562, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 544.2891235351562, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. If any Fifth Amendment testimony is admitted, it should be preceded by a iury \ninstruction that the invocation of this constitutional right should not create a negative \nor adverse presumption.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6724243164062, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6724243164062, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. THIS COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE CERTAIN OF THE EkINWTS IDENTIFIED \nON TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 543.2682495117188, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 543.2682495117188, + 293.3625183105469 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 293.3625183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. The Exhibits Should Be Excluded Pursuant To F tatute Sections 90.401 and \n90.403.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 333.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 333.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Exhibits Relating to Prior Convictions and Criminal Matters Shiu \nExcluded.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 181.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 181.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 210.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 210.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. its Should be Excluded as Inadmissible Hearsay.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 423.7336120605469, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 423.7336120605469, + 569.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 569.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Certain Exhibits Should Be Exclud issible Opinion Testimony.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 492.6596374511719, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 492.6596374511719, + 390.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 390.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Exhibits Should Be Excluded For Other Reasons As Well.14/ )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 426.9275207519531, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 426.9275207519531, + 291.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 291.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. THIS COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE USE OF ANY DEROGATORY \nADJECTIVES WHEN REFERENCING EPSTEIN.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 635.04 + ], + [ + 543.0441284179688, + 635.04 + ], + [ + 543.0441284179688, + 664.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 664.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. THIS COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE REFERENCES TO ANY CASES AGAINST \nEPSTEIN WHICH WERE NOT PROSECUTED BY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 543.3538818359375, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 543.3538818359375, + 652.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 652.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. THE COURT SHOUL \nEPSTEIN SETTLE \nSETTLEMENTS, IN \nNOT REPRESENTED \nDE TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE THAT \nOR SUBSEQUENT CLAIMS, SUITS, OR \nTHE AMOUNTS THEREOF FOR PLAINTIFFS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761063" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..935e4a9dc42c4dac1333c959a83494f1bf2e5ed2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.md @@ -0,0 +1,1110 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF EIN'S APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF HIS REVISED OMNIMIS ION IN LIMINE + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps ) files this Appendix in support of his revised Omnibus Motion in Limbic. E documents and testimony cited here' s revised Motion: ill gupplement this Appendix to attach the actual + +#### I. DOCUMENTS AND FO TION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S COMPLAINT + +# A. Cited Nei erage: November 3-6, 2009 + +On Nove 3, t9, 2 0 the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "Scott Rodutein's •vcs ent deals seemed too good to be true." Sally Kestin, Jon Burstein & Brittany Wall Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 3, 2009.i The Sun-Sentinel reported that "Rothstein attracted investors by promising huge returns and selling settlements he said he'd reached in sex discrimination and whistle-blower cases, + +Available at http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-11-03/news/sfl-rothstein-investment-planllsbnov03\_1 scott-rothstein-stuart-rosenfeldt-firm. + +documents he gave prospective clients show." Id. The Sun-Sentinel quoted Alan Sakowitz, "a Miami lawyer and developer[] [who] told the Sun Sentinel he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor three times, but quickly became suspicious. 'I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake settlements,' Sakowitz said." Id. According to the Sun-Sentinel, a "spokesman for Banyan Income Fund, an investment group that collected \$65 million and invested an undisclos ount with Rothstein, said it contacted federal prosecutors in recent days with con t 'suspicious activity.' Id. The Sun-Sentinel interviewed Rosenfeldt, who told th r that "several of [his] co-workers may have done work for [Rothstein's] invest ) b s without realizing its scope or nature." Id. The Sun-Sentinel reported that it t t)o ed "Rothstein's confidential offerings," which "describe[d] extremely high- • b largely unregulated investment opportunities," one of which "offered investo ent return in three months, far more than the troubled and bond markets." I ako told the Sun-Sentinel that "Rothstein boasted of having sophisticated eavesdropp ent and that former cops would sift through potential defendants' garbage," that "R claimed to have a 'huge volume of cases, an employer sleeping with the secretat ceptionist,"' and that Rothstein claimed he "offered his clients a way to avoid wa sum up iron RRA " for tlfe [settlement] money by giving them a lesser amount, but in a lump The Sun-Sentinel said that, according to Rothstein's offering documents, t sexual discrimination and whistle-blower cases and used former cops to dig up incriminating evidence," "the firm urged the targets of the claims to pay a settlement without a public lawsuit," "'[t]hese types of cases are highly confidential and thus, quite lucrative, because the defendants place a high premium on keeping the details of the case confidential,' and investors "would receive the full settlement amount in three to 12 months, with a guaranteed minimum 20 percent return[.]" + +On November 6, 2009, the New Times Broward-Palm Beach printed an article entitled "Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy." Bob Norman, Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy, New Times Broward-Palm Beach, Nov. 6, 2009.2 According to the New Times, "[o]ne way" that Rothstein enticed investors "was by tri believing that his firm was representing numerous underaged girls who ha billionaire and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein." Id. "Rothstein claimed that he had flight logs showing that Epstein including former President Bill Clinton, on his private jg Rothstein "told investors that Epstein, Clinton, an "c ict tt s.c, choice but to settle these cases and that it was s 1/44c c r b reasure-trove." Id. The New Times said that investors "then ponied up millions • v m the settlements, pay out a portion of those yetir a...e ," but Rothstein was "fabricating the story" and there dent, who was at one time a real friend of Epstein's, and ut by Rothstein were involved in any way." Id. settlements to the victims, and poc was "no indication that the fo other celebrity names ban em] into Palm Beach roes reported that ex Tiiely prominent people, e of the plaintiffs" and that ebrities involved basically had no + +ted "Fort Lauderdale attorney Bill Scherer, who [wa]s representing The New qu multiple Ro vestors.... 'He used the [Epstein case] as a showpiece, as bait,' said Scherer. 'That' he raised all the money. He would use legitimate cases as bait for luring investors into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there.'" Id. The New Times mentioned "one legitimate case involving Epstein and + +2 Available at http://www.browardpalmbeach.cominews/scott-rothstein-the-jeffrey-epstein-andbill-clinton-ploy-6471700. + +an underaged girl" involving RRA; identified William Berger, not as the attorney handling the matter; and reported that "[s]ources sa[id] they believe[d] Berger wasn't involved in Rothstein's scam." Id. A source described the Epstein fabrications as "one of Rothstein's more profitable creations," and told the New Times to "'[t]hink of the legitimate Epstein civil case as a car on the road, ... [t]hen think of that car driving off the road onto heavy terrain and lficking into four-wheel drive. That's what happened here, and Rothstein was at the wheel.' + +#### B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint + +On November 9, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office them District of Florida filed a civil forfeiture action against certain property oth The complaint said Rothstein "and others" had been operating a Ponzi schemi c ts 1.5. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09 cv-61780-WJZ DE-I ¶ 13.) The Government alle ilit had told potential investors that his firm had negotiated settlements betw ilS " g•• i ents and would-be defendants and that, under the terms of these settlements, t clients would receive substantial payments in exchange for not filing "civil clai al harassment and other labor-related cases." (Id. ¶ 14.) Rothstein offered inves rtunity to purchase these settlements at a discount. (Id.) The firm's clients would I 12/• "e ,less money, but they would be paid immediately in a lump sum. (Id.) Over time, invest would receive the full value of the clients' settlements. (Id.) The problem, the ent alleged, was that the settlements were not real. (Id. ¶ 15.) Rothstein used n rs' money to pay older investors the money they were supposed to receive from the phony settlements they thought they had purchased. (Id.) + +# C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009 + +On November 12, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone." Sally Kestin and Peter Franceschina, FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 12, 2009.3 The Sun-Sentinel reported that "[t]he FBI confirmed Thursday what many have speculated since the Scott Rothstein scandal broke: The flashy lawyer could not have defrauded investors of hundreds of millions without help. 'I do not believe that this was a one-man show,' said John Gillies, head of the FBI in South Florida." Id. + +# D. The Investors' Complaint + +On November 20, 2009, William Scherer, the attorney quoted in th mes article on November 6, 2009, sued Rothstein, David Boden, Debra M, arnett, TD Bank, N.A., Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky d Preve on behalf of investors Razorback Funding, LLC, D3 Capital Club, L 4 vestment, LLC, Linda Von Allmen (as trustee of the Von Allmen Dynasty T liners, LP, and Kretschmar. (17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943 -3.) The plaintiffs alleged Rothstein had "devised an elaborate plan to assign pu e p tiffs' confidential settlements with structured payments to investors at a lump s c rated rate. In reality, while some of the cases relied upon to induce investor fun fabricated. Indeed, ref u rlier investors were not made via structured payments, but instead were made with t rinci obtained from later investors—a classic Ponzi scheme." (Id. I 2.) The plaintiff r lleged that "[i]nvestors were told that the Principal Conspirators had an extens. use private investigative team, including former F.B.I. and C.I.A. agents, whose singular task was to obtain compromising evidence against high-profile putative defendants. Rothstein's story was that the evidence and surveillance acquired, often supporting civil causes of real, all of the confidential settlements were purely + +3 Available at http:// http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-11-12/live/fl-rothstein-associates-20091112\_1\_rothstein-rosenfeldt-adler-scott-rothstein-alan-sakowitz. + +action ranging from sexual harassment to mass tort cover-ups to whistle-blower claims, was presented to the putative defendant who was then offered an opportunity to avoid litigation and the negative publicity associated therewith by agreeing to resolve the matter voluntarily by and through a confidential settlement with the putative plaintiff.” (*Id.* ¶ 28.) The investors alleged that “Rothstein would show investors the purported settlement agreement in an attempt to substantiate the deal; however, because the settlements were pre-suit and confidential, the names of the putative plaintiffs and putative defendants were redacted.” (*Id.* ¶ 34.) + +The investors further alleged “the purported settlements, *albeit* fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by RRA”—including one of Edwards’ cases against Epstein: + +One of the settlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous billionaire financier. In fact, RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein’s alleged victims in a civil case styled *Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein*, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered “the opportunity” to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set of operative facts as the *Jane Doe* case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff. . . . To augment his concocted story Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker’s boxes of actual case files in *Jane Doe* in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard Epstein’s private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered \$200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein did not yet know about. . . . + +Additionally, Rothstein used RRA’s representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation, but potentially beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. For instance, RRA relentlessly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age women were on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein’s lies. + +(Id. ¶¶ 40-41.) + +The investors also alleged that, "even after Rothstein's October 27, 2009 departure to Morocco, millions of dollars continued to flow out of RRA accounts from the Fort Lauderdale TD Bank accounts, indicative of an insider(s) maintaining operations of the Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ 102c.) The investors further alleged that "[a] Ponzi scheme cannot be operated wit out insider help. Plaintiffs believe that additional members of RRA, including its non-la tigators, were used by Rothstein to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi s e details of these individuals[`] or entities[`] involvement¶ and participation is pr t own but further allegations and counts will be added as discovery is conduct drll6fmation concerning the complicity of these individuals or entities is confirmed. " + +rinted an article entitled "Feds: Scott On November 24, 2009, The Miami Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries a " Jay Weaver & Scott Hiaasen, Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid solar !affirm, The Miami Herald, Nov. 24, 2009. According to the article, "Rothstein's law rated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70 lawyer firm had a payroll T v8 million, prosecutors said. Rothstein, who owned half of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ed inv tors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said." Id. e further reported that "[t]he civil forfeiture is based on money-laundering allega Rothstein amassed his fortune by defrauding investors, prosecutors said. Investors bought shares in his fabricated confidential settlements from employment-discrimination and other civil cases during the past four years — investments that promised returns of up to 40 percent." Id. + +#### E. Cited News Coverage: November + +# F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors + +On November 23, 2009, and November 27, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed amended civil forfeiture complaints against Rothstein's property. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ DE-14, DE-19.) The Government again alleged that Rothstein "and others" had been running a Ponzi scheme. See id. + +Scherer filed an amended complaint on behalf of the investor plaintiffs on November 25, 2009. (See 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.) The amended complaint quoted a November 23, 2009, interview of Rothstein by the Sun-Sentinel: "Rothste . . . stated that `karma has caught up with him, but it will catch up with others too . .. You' town full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at C )" d. ¶¶ 7.) The plaintiffs did not amend their allegations concerning the cases against e ► **ee generally 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.)** + +### **G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Informati ,c te** + +**On December 1, 2009, the FBI arrested Rot "':, 441;" c United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a c is I , rmation against him. The information identified RRA as a criminal enterprise. D a. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC DE-1 ¶ 2.) The government alleged that, from 200 1 ember 2009, Rothstein and others had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activi eluded mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to launder m (Id. ¶¶ 3-4.) According to the Government, Rothstein and his unidentified co-c to ad operated a Ponzi scheme and obtained \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud. (I e Government repeated its allegations that Rothstein had lied to investors,** + +**The amended complaint misquotes the article slightly. "'You're hurting my daughter, you're hurting my son,' [Rothstein] said. (Rothstein has a biological daughter who is 16, and the son he's talking about is someone he took on as a sort of mentor, he said this summer.) `Haven't I already hurt them enough?' he asked, before delivering a final `message' and hanging up. He called back this evening, responding to a text message. He said karma is going to get him, but it's going to get other people, too. 'You're in a town full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at that.'" Brittany Waltman, Scott Rothstein: "You're in a town full of thieves", S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 23, 2009. Available at http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sfl-mtblog-2009- II-scott\_rothstein havent\_i\_hurt-story.html.** + +had told them that his firm had settled certain sexual harassment and whistleblower cases on behalf of its clients and obtained sizeable payouts, and had offered investors the opportunity to purchase these phony settlements at a discount. (Id. 11 10-11.) The Government alleged that Rothstein and his co-conspirators had "created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements," and "made false statements to current investors in order to convince them to re-invest in additional purported confidential settlement agreements." (Id. VI 21, 23.) + +#### II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND A FFID GARDING PROBABLE CAUSE C + +#### A. Epstein's Deposition—March 17, 2010 + +Epstein testified as follows: + +Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +A. L.M. is part of a conspiracy with Scott Rothstein, \ AC()C Indic), . creating -- excuse me — creating fraudulent cases of a sexua argsd nature in which the U.S. Attorney has already charged the firm of Rothstei fi which is a partner, was a partner, with creating, fabricatin cases of a sexual nature, including cases with respect to me, specifically, in o ecce unsuspecting investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars. + +Q. What role do you conte d L. eyed in that conspiracy to create fraudulent cases? + +A. L.M.'s testimony fore e met Mr. was dramatically -- sworn testimon to the FBI was dramatic erent after she came in contact with Mr. , where her testimo then anged to sort of a hostile and had claims of -- claims never made before, n ade to anyone before, and allegations that I've read in her Complaint that that hOn atically different from the ones she had spoken to the FBI about, sir. + +(Tr. at 13:9 + +Q. Yo Complaint in this action alleges that L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her alleged damages. What does that mean? + +A. I believe that as part of the scheme to defraud investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across the board. And the only way -- in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what I've read in the paper, claims that I've settled cases for \$200-million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of serious sum of money, which is outrageous. + +(Tr. at 19:7-20:1.) + +Q. Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against him? + +A. Yes, many things. + +Q. List them for me, please. + +A. He has — he has gone to the media out of, I believe, in an attempt to gin up these allegations. He has contacted the media. He has used the media for his own purposes. I le has brought discovery — he has engaged in discovery proceedings that bear no nship to any case filed against me by any of his clients. His firm, which he's the as been accused of forging a Federal Judge's signature. + +(Tr. at 23:4-19.) + +Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt to, p, unquote, these allegations and en ged in what you contend to be irreleva v proceedings, what else did Mr. , personally, do that forms the basi suit? + +A. Mr. personally, engaged wit i rs, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail cell, potentially for the rest of h' he ared information, what I've been told and -- excuse me -- what I've read ' e ne papers, 13 boxes of information that had my name on it, with other attome He counseled his clients to maintain a position alleging multi-million dol in order for them to scam local investors out of millions of dollars. He i any of his other partners already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Att ey e been accused by the U.S. Attorney of running a criminal enterprise. + +Q. Anything eIscYYY + +A. an think of at the moment? + +Q. at media did Mr. go to? + +A. I am aware of at least the Daily News in New York City. I have been told by other people that there were other media, local media. I've been told that the — his investigator was sent to California to harass people representing his -- Brad Me investigator — representing fictitiously, fraudulently that he was a FBI agent to try to gather information for Mr. claims. + +(Tr. at 25:6-26:15.) + +Q. What does an investigator going to California have to do with Mr. allegedly going to the media in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these allegations? + +A. ... It's part of Mr. scheme to involve people who have nothing to do with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back to the media and gin up his stories and make false allegations of people that have sexually charged nature cases in order to attempt to fleece investors, local investors out of millions of dollars. His firm has been accused by the U.S. Attorney of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators, by illegal wire , by illegal methods of eavesdropping in order to go to the media and generate cases. + +When did Mr. go to the Daily News? Q. + +I don't know. A. + +How did lie go to the Daily News? Q. + +CO S + +I don't know. A. + +What did he say to the Daily News? Q. + +I believe Mr. knows that. I don' \te /49 tly what he said. A. + +Q. What is the source of your informat at I went to the Daily News at all, ever? + +A. It's attorney/client. + +Q. You said you were told of er people that he went to other media representatives? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are ther people that told you that? + +A. I do at the moment. + +Q. lid these other people who you don't remember tell you Mr. did with to other media representatives besides the Daily News? + +A. Again, the question again? + +Q. What did these other people tell you Mr. did with respect to going to other media? + +A. Mr. went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medias and making statements to local press regarding false claims made by his clients in order that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, could defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +Q. When did these other people whose identity you can't remember tell you these things that Brad did. + +A. Sometime in the past year. + +Q. How many other people were there who told you these things about Mr. + +A. I don't recall with specificity. + +Q. Well, do you recall in any degree how many there were? + +A. I would say, probably five to ten. + +Q. Where were you when these conversations took place t u cif t -- the identity of those participants you can't remember? + +Mr. Pike: So we're clear, within the last year -- co rrec — Ise? + +Mr. Scarola: Well, that's what your client said. I ve a word he says, but that's what he said. + +Q. Yes, sir. Where did th414/tco,..rsations ?Si with these five to ten people take place whose identity you can't remember? + +A. Again, sir? + +A. On the tel~ne. + +Q. Wh ilia the phone calls? + +A. questions, I have no — I don't have any recollection. + +Q. Did the people who were on the phone identify themselves or were these anonymous callers? + +A. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I don't recall with specificity. + +Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly communicate to the Daily News to quote, gin up these allegations, unquote? + +A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. -- not quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred to as Mr. statements. + +Q. Would you read the question back, please, Sandy? + +A. He alleged that third parties had already been involved in some allegations to do with sexual misconduct. + +Q. Which third parties? + +A. I don't recall sitting here today. + +Q. Involved how? + +A. If I recall with specificity, if I had the articles in fr Maybe next time. e, I would be able to recall. + +Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean?As , + +A. It means craft allegations of mul dams es of \$50-million, settl partners to fleece based on cases that didn' ho dollar cases; in fact, alleging in L.M.'s case order for Scott Rothstein and the rest of Mr. mg investors out of millions and millions of dollars eged cases that I had settled. + +(Tr. at 28:14-33:21.) + +Q. Was your referenc !PI( uote, gin up these allegations, unquote, a reference to allegations made again you? + +CO SA + +A. e vast conspiracy of the Rothstein firm and Mr. participation in it, it alleged that many cases were fraudulently brought — alleged that have been bro t; ginned up, meaning, crafted, multi-million dollar numbers put on cases in order to fleece investors, where his partner, Scott Rothstein, currently sits in jail for just those purposes, Mr. Scarola. + +My question to you is: Did the reference to, quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations against you? Q. + +A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper reports. + +(fr. at 34:3-22.) + +Q. What specific discovery proceedings did Mr. the basis for your lawsuit? engage in which you contend form + +A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. + +Q. Which various people? Who? + +A. For example, he tried to depose Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of gett' tici sblicity so that he and his firm could fraudulently steal, craft money from unsusp ' tors in South Florida out of millions of dollars. + +(Tr. at 36:10-23.) + +Q. You said something about Mr. sharing 13 formation with somebody - + +A. Yes. + +Q. — as forming part of the basis for your S/5 inst Mr. M, correct? + +A. Correct. + +Q. All right. With whom did \* share these 13 boxes of information? + +A. It has been reported in of his firm that was the ally accused by the U.S. Attorney, sir, of being a criminal enterprise. Complaint that he shared those boxes with the partners + +Q. Do yo r my question? + +A. Y e who he shared it with? + +Q. Y + +A. The partners of his firm, sir. + +Q. Okay. So part of the basis of your lawsuit is that Mr. allowed members of his own law firm to see 13 boxes of information; is that correct? + +A. No, that's not corren claim is that the 13 boxes of information that were shown to investors by Mr. partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by the press contain multiple cases, fraudulently — and if you like the word -- fabricated in order to fleece + +investors out of money. The 13 boxes were shared with investors, Mr. Mr. partners and some of those partners currently under indi[ct]ment, the others already sitting in jail. + +(Tr. at 37:18-38:22.) + +Q. Which newspaper said which case was fabricated? + +A. Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were fabricated, to my best recollection. The Scherer complaint alleged many fabricated cases, sir. + +(Tr. at 39:7-12.) + +Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against Mr. basis of this lawsuit is something having to do with sending an Would you tell me, please, more specifically what it is that to semlijam investigator to California which you contend j Mr. a tend form the or to California. ds did with regard a legal claim against + +A. Reported widely in the newspapers is the f cl activities, wire taps, and methods by the Rothstein firm while Mr. Edwar as cally been bringing these cases. The investigator, Mr. Fisten, who's mentio h omplaint, represented himself as an FBI agent, falsely represented himself as Bl a ent. + +Q. Do you have any personal lato 1 e anything that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was in California? + +A. I'm sorry. Based ftomey/client privilege, I can't answer. + +(Tr. at 48:9-49:11 ? t + +Q. Is it y S t ion that Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap? + +A. It w y reported in the newspaper -- + +Q. I'm of asking [if] it was reported -- + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. — in the newspaper. + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. I want to know whether your contention is that Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap. + +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspaper that his firm and his partners were involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired former FBI and law enforcement officials in order to fabricate cases of a sexually charged nature against me and others. +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. ever having engaged in any illegal wire tap? +- A. I have no personal knowledge; however, what I read in the newspapers a is widely reported is that his firm, and I believe Mr. Sakowitz went to the FBI after told that the firm was engaged in illegal wire taps and his partners were engaged • ega taps. The FBI, the U.S. Attorney has accused his firm of RICO, being the 1 criminal fraud enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in illegal w t the answer specifically to your question about personal knowledge, sir, no +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. ever h been involved in any illegal or improper eavesdropping? +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers in S l a that Mr. firm, his partners were involved in illegal wire tap '11 act gathering, using what the newspapers quoted as sophisticated meth owitz, who was approached as an investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a mt, alleges similar activities. But personal knowledge, myself, sir, no. +- Q. Do you have any personal was ever involved in obstructions of justice? +- A. It's attorney/client privil 'm afraid. +- Q. Do you have any rs nal knowledge that actionable uds? was ever involved in any +- A. e of the newspapers, which have accused his firm of a monstrous fraud, purported e largest fraud in South Florida's history, accused by the U.S. Attorney, where his parte sits in jail -- excuse me — reported in the newspapers of boxes of material on Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot answer that question because of attorney/client privilege. +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that ever forged Federal Court Orders and/or Opinions? +- A. It's attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that was ever involved in the marketing of non-existent Epstein settlements? + +A. I'm sorry. I would like to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege I cannot today. + +Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics. Other than those matters previously referred to in earlier questions, is it you contention that had any personal involvement in any other, abusive investigatory tactics? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers that Mr. -- wildly abusive practices throughout the State of Florida in investors out of millions of dollars. The U.S. Atto engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. Mr. Sc amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. I have n attorney/client privileged information, regardi engaged in widely o fleece unsuspecting Complaint alleges his firm omplaint alleges monstrous owledge, separate from the ards. + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge tit( were unsupportable? ever filed legal papers that + +A. I'm afraid it's attomey/clic + +Q. Do you have any perso that, quote, compromis Florida? edge that Mr. was ever involved in any conduct ore values of both State and Federal justice systems in South + +Can y S e-- can you define for me what you mean by "personal knowledge," sir? + +y and not through the report of some third person or newspaper that you ever see, hear, smell, taste, or touch anything that communicated w rsonally involved in compromising the core values of both State and Federal justice systems in South Florida. + +Mr. Pike: Form. Same instruction with regard to attorney/client. + +A. Yes. Are you suggesting that anyone who told me specifically or things that I might have read that specifically relate to him, is not what you've been asking me for? + +Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly right. + +A. You told me if I hear something, that's not personal knowledge. + +Q. Not if you hear it from somebody else. + +A. Who else would I hear it from, besides somebody else, sir? + +Q. Well, if you heard it directly yourself. + +A. From who? + +Q. Maybe Mr. + +A. Uh-huh. Is that the only person, sir? + +Q. That's the only person, that's correct. + +A. Well, if it's the only person, separate from attorney/client pri ege, I cannot answer that. + +(Tr. at 49:13-55:22.) + +Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a purpose i \ 11% i lawsuit — + +A. Yes. + +Q. -- to vindicate the hardworking and affected by the misconduct that is th s t of this Complaint. ers and their clients who were adversely + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are those hardwo to 31td4honest lawyers on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint? + +A. Yes. The Attdfney, sir, has accused the Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system le of abuse never seen before in the United States history, of forging docu ents, an affront to any decent lawyer, signing Judge's Orders, sending false other lawyers. The people who have been -- excuse me — the Complaint by Attorney, in fact describes the behavior of the law firm, as well as Mr. -- my Co laint says, Mr. being a part of that. + +(Tr. at 57:2-57:25.) + +Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking and honest lawyers" are that are referred to in that section of your Complaint. + +A. My attorneys, at least, are honest. + +Q. Which ones? + +A. All of them. + +Q. And you say that you want to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients? + +A. That's correct. + +Q. Which clients? + +A. Me, some of the other clients, in fact, abused by the Rothstein firm. I don't extent. Hopefully when we get to trial, we're icirifind out the exte the lawyers, the clients that were abused by Mr. and the Rothst asked for Scott Rothstein's deposition. We hopefully will get it. M some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact, been handled undergone, including forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. ow the full e people, e have e will give us buses they've + +(Tr. at 59:11-25.) + +Q. And did you mean to say what this sentence says, endeavored to vindicate the hardworking and ho adversely affected by the misconduct that is th racketeering enterprise and their clients, who were this Complaint?" + +Mr. Pike: Okay. I'm going to move to strike. r raderizes the language of the document. The document reads as follows, for p the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromi e e c e values of both State and Federal justice systems in South Florida and to icat he hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adverselya y the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint." + +Q. Is that what you meant + +A. What I meant to •t is -- seems to me somewhat unclear -- is that the Rothstein firm, along with E , is part of a criminal enterprise, the largest -- excuse me — the largest cn al ent rise in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, engaging in ille ps, illegal behaviors. And part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which mean should set right. And if it's not clear, the Rothstein finn compromised the co f our legal justice system. It abused every — many of the precepts, the most lues of the American justice system. And, in fact, I believe this lawsuit, part of the for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the various techniques of attorney/client privilege, abuse of techiiiibuse of discovery, illegal wire taps, forging signatures engaged in by both Mr. and his firm. + +Q. So it is your contention that Mr. was part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Yes, it is. + +Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? + +w • • + +A. Attorney/client privilege. + +(Tr. at 62:13-64:3.) + +Q. What knowledge do you have of Brad ever having personally engaged in mail fraud? + +Q. I mean direct observation through your senses on your part. + +A. So are you asking me whether or not I've witnes nding something directly, putting physically in the mail, sir? + +Q. I'm asking whether you have ever persona engaged in mail fraud. ever having + +A. I'm not sure how that's possible for gd ad} witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's done? + +Q. So the answer to my questio 4 on't know; is that correct? + +A. My answer to your que . I've asked for a clarification. + +Q. Have you ever pe Tziii4or nally ttnessed engaging in mail fraud? + +A. It's been widely reported in the press. + +Q. I'm roing to withdraw my question. What person knowledge do yo ever having been engaged in any mail fraud? + +A. Will you describe what you mean by "personal knowledge." sirc 9 + +A. No, sir 3S. + +Q. H er personally witnessed Edward -- engaged in wire fraud? + +A. H would one -- I'm not sure how anyone would personal -- have personal knowledge, wt ess someone engaging in wire fraud, unless they were simply sitting over their computer looking at their bank accounts. So, unfortunately, I would have to say, no, sir. + +Q. Have you ever personally witnessed engaged in money laundering? + +A. Again, sir, the U.S. Attorney's Complaint of the Rothstein firm alleges money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, RICO claims of Mr. MI partners and his firm, calling the firm + +the largest criminal enterprise in South Florida's history, accused of fabricating malicious cases, sir, of a sexually charged nature in order to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of millions of dollars. + +Q. And,' tang to find out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever personally participated in any of that wrongdoing? + +A. I'm afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +Q. Do you have any evidence — knowledge of any evidence whatsoever ever participated in any effort to market any kind of investment in an + +A. I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence whatsoever tha participant in devising a plan through which were sold of a structured payout settlement? dwards was ever a confidential assignments + +A. The newspapers and blogs have widely report you repeat the question for me, again, sir? t ' firm crafted -- would + +Q. Yessir. I want to know whether y e y knowledge of evidence that personally ever participa evis g a plan through which were sold purported confidential assignments of a st out settlement? + +A. I'd like to answer that esti 7Gy saying that the newspapers have reported that his firm was engaged in fraudul ctured settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. With t to my personal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward tone point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to assert atto cyrclient p vilege. + +Q. Your omplaint alleges that Rothstein and others in RRA were using RRA to market in s ent Who are the others referred to in the Complaint? + +A. m my understanding of the U.S. Attorney's Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it i e partners and people who held themselves out to be partners of the Roth -- Scott Rothstein, including Mr. Berger Mr. Adler, Mr. and other people associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane, if that's how you pronounce her name, Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. + +Q. Which — which source of information referenced in that answer specifically made reference to Mr. + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +Q. But you do have a recollection that one or more of them did; is that correct? + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 64:20-69:6.) + +Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers, sir, that the Rothstein firm en in sifting through many people's garbage in order -- in an attempt to blackmail th As , + +(Tr. at 74:5-10.) + +Q. Yes. I'd like to know what the answer to that question is. your garbage looking for damaging evidence? (Tr. at 74:4—8.) <94 ever sift through + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Do you have any information indica( dley ever had any knowledge of anyone associated with the Roths t holding meetings during which, quote, "false statements were made about th f cases/clients that existed or RRA had against Epstein and the value thereo e? + +A. My best recollect n is the of meetings where of dollars b abri personall privil .S. Attorney has accused the Rothstein firm of just those types ers got together, schemed to defraud local investors of millions ng cases of a sexually charged nature. And whether Mr. cipated, I'm going to at least today, sir, have to assert the attorney/client k forward to one day disclosing it. + +(Tr. at 76: + +Q. P ph 23 of your Complaint says that: "RRA, Rothstein and M, claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, the were able to effectively use initials," et cetera. Do you have any knowledge that fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? + +A. I believe Mr. Scherer's Complaint -- + +Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. I'm not asking about any evidence that you have. + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and his claim against the Rothstein firm for a massive fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to — at least in the -- described in the public press, because he went to the FBI for fabricating cases that included initials. With respect to anything specific with Mr. I'm going to have to claim the attorney/client privilege today, sir. + +Q. Do you have any -- do you have knowledge of the existence of any evi ce th knew that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Po ' me? + +A. That's attorney/client privilege. C + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that w to have known that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a Ponzi scheme? should + +A. And today I'm going to have to assert y/client privilege. . . . Separate from the communication I've had with my a 't answer that question. + +(Tr. at 77:19—80:6.) + +Q. Do you have any eviden sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest ed personal injury lawsuits? + +A. The newsp a4 widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settlemen cases of a sexual nature, including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the d is m Mr. and his firm and we have not been able to get them as of ye nfident that once we do, I will be able to answer your questions with more + +Q. As u sit here today, do you have any evidence whatsoever to support an assertion that individually and personally, sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? + +A. You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege to the answer, I'm afraid, but I'd like to answer that question. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence indicating that ever reached agreements to share attorney's fees with non-lawyers? + +A. In fact, Mr. Scarola, we have subpoenaed Mr. documents and documents from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me more specificity with the answers to that question. I'm looking forward to getting the — that specific evidence. With respect to what we currently know, sitting here today, I'm unfortunately going to have to claim my attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you today have any evidence to support an assertion that cr used investor money to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front moneys at they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +C A. I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client privil answer that question as well, sir. afraid, though I'd like to + +Q. Do you have any evidence to support the ass'Sill ist" at conducted searches, wire taps or intercepted conversa q• "i ' ation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. Your question, once again asked di eavesdropping? Did he walk to he, personally, stand outside; behavior in an attempt to attorney has filed a Com that his firm did. The subpoenaed used my na not received any. ne — Mr. personally involved in the ouse and sort of apsbug in their house? Did estion is, did Mr. firm engage in this al investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. g that they did. The Complaints filed by Scherer saying omplaint says my name and the boxes of files that we've , We have requested information, but up until today have you a more specific answer, I'm afraid I cannot. r. + +Q. Do you h wire to knowl&Ige of any evidence that ever conducted searches, epted conversations in violation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. n ewspapers and the U.S. Attorney's Complaint widely reported that Mr. fi and people hired by his firm, investigators hired by his firm fraudulently representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in just those activities, sir. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that was ever aware of any such activities. + +A. I'm going to have to -- ... assert the attorney/client privilege to that, sir. + +The cost of ridiculous litigation, of ii attorneys prepare responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various locati t a inimum, sir. A. + +Burman Critton, Jack ttr nd a bunch of the others, sir. A. + +Which lawyers? Q. + +Which ones? Name thee, please. Q. + +Specifically — I ha any lawyers defending me here against Mr. I can't sit here -- at I can't recall it with specificity. A. + +You ber any of your lawyers' names? Q. + +Uh A. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge that ever participated in or was aware of actions that utilized the judicial process, including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South Florida's history engaged in by Mr. firm and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, not only illegal wire taps and eavesdropping, but an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe sp for itself. Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. today, I'm going to hav assert the attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + +Q. Is contention that Mr. Scherer's Complaint even con + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 83:11-88:18.) + +Q. What arc the dams es that ou claim to have suture consequence of any wrongdoing on the part of + +Q. Besides Mr. -- besides the Burman Critton firm and Mr. Goldberger? + +A. Are you asking me for the firm, sir, or are you asking me for the names? + +Q. I want as much information as you can give me about this element of damage which you claim; and, that is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be damages in this case. + +A. Okay.... Mr. Roy Black. + +Q. Okay. Who else? + +A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. Mr. Jay Lefkowitz. The firm of Burman Critton Luttier. That's it for the moment. + +Q. How much have you paid the law firm of Burman Critton and Luttier which you claim is damages? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. + +Q. How much? + +A. I don't have that figure offhand. + +Alit\ ' t + +Q. Can you give us any better figure than hundreds of thousands of dollart e + +A. No, not sitting here today. + +Q. Are you paying them on an hourly basis? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. What is the hourly rate at which you are compe bers of the law firm? + +A. They're ordinary rates. + +Q. What are they? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. How much have you paid + +A. I'm not aware total am + +Q. What is the hourl which you're paying Mr. Goldberger? + +A. His norm urly + +Q. How at? + +A. ow. + +Q. Ho much have you paid Mr. Black which you claim as damages in this case? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +A. I believe so. + +Q. What is the hourly rate? + +CO + +More hundred thousand dollars. dyinghim on an hourly basis? Q. + +A. I'm not -- I do not know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? + +A. I don't know the exact amount, sir. + +Q. What's your best estimate? + +A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +A. I believe so. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +Q. At what hourly rate? + +A. I believe so. + +A. I don't latow, sir. + +Q. How much are you pa Ja — how much have you paid Jay Lefkowitz? + +A. I'm not sure, sir. + +Q. Do you ha any id at all? + +A. + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. What is the form of payment to your lawyers? How do you transfer money to them? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. Pardon me? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? + +A. I would guess so. + +Q. Who? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart from the mone C5SA o lawyers? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. What? + +A. The stress and emotional damage of impe with no relevance whatsoever to these Federal prison, who engaged in disco consideration or relevance to this fleece investors in South Flori endships and business relationships ght by a firm that whose partner sits in a s my friends and social contacts with no oever, in an attempt to simply fleece -- partly lions of dollars, sir. + +Q. What is the value of those + +A. I'm not sure yet, s It + +Q. Do You h y id at all? + +A. Not s ting ere today. + +Q. less than \$1 0? + +A. I would guess it's more than \$10, sir. + +Q. More or less than a hundred? + +A. I would guess it's quite an amount of money. + +Q. Is it more or less than a hundred? A. Yes, sir. + +Q. More or less than a thousand. + +A. I would say it's more than 150,000. + +Q. More or less than a million? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. So somewhere between 150,000 and a million? + +Assac A. No, sir. It's not -- ... No, sir. That's not what I said. I said, I did no + +A. Maybe. + +CO + +Q. Maybe more than a million? + +Q. More or less than a billion? + +Q, Maybe more than a billion? + +A. Maybe more. + +Q. How arc you going to go a findrfig out what the value of that loss is? + +I don't know. + +A. I will respectfullytzcline to answer that. + +Q. On what bAsis? + +A. Attorirytal,Icnt Privilege. + +Mr. Pike:\_Andsfork product. + +Q. Any-other elements of damage? + +A. Not -- there might be, but sitting here today, I can't think of them. + +Q. Do you have written contracts with any of your lawyers? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Who does? + +A. I don't know. + +(Tr. at 116:8-123:18.) + +#### B. Epstein's Deposition—January 25,2012 + +Q. Yes, sir. Is it your contention that action on behalf of LM? abusively prosecuted the federal court + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. How? + +A. filed a 234-count federal complaint in conj Rothstein to enable his partners at RRA to defraud south Flo dollars. His partner Scott Rothstein and his partner Rothstein has now in deposition admitted that the investors that there was real action, in Mr. Ro The investors had not been able to fmd a fil Rothstein that there was no filed complai filed the federal complaint for 234. QnN ctio his partner Scott vestors of millions of ave — excuse me, Mr. to file a complaint to show , going on in federal court. mt and had complained to Mr. excuse me, before Mr. dler + +Q. Were you ever served with that com + +A. Not to the best of my recollec + +Q. So one contention is that of LM with which you ds abusively prosecuted a federal court action on behalf er served, correct? + +A. I had — I was notice at the case was, in fact, filed. + +Q. But you w ever rved with the case, correct? + +A. I was nb d at the case was filed. + +Q. re never served with the case, correct? But + +A. N the best of my recollection. + +Q. Okay. What damage did you incur as a consequence of the filing of a complaint with which you were never served? + +A. I incurred many legal -- much legal fees, many legal fees, in fact, to try to figure out why — what was going on and, in fact, getting prepared to defend the case though I had not yet been served. + +Epstein testified as follows: + +NA + +Q. Were the allegations in the federal complaint on behalf of LM any different than the allegations in the state court case on behalf of LM? + +A. I don't recall. + +(Tr. at 19:16-21:9.) + +C. Epstein's Affidavit—June 30, 2017 + +Epstein set forth the following "good faith basis" for commencing his action against + +Rothstein and + +- 5. I filed the Action against Rothstein and because, bas below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at th Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown p Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct in illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm the very civil cases litigated against me by potential investors in the Ponzi Scheme. +- 6. In early November 2009, stories in the p about the implosion of RRA, the Ponzi the Ponzi Scheme of certain civil The cases Summary Judgment Motion (t out of millions of dollars an +- 7. In November 2009, I a at RRA, the Florida B employed by is described ling my original theirs at Rothstein, g a widely publicized onzi Scheme") that featured were being used to defraud ws, and on the internet were legion erpetrated at that firm, and the misuse in ng litigated against me by RRA partner, g against me, which are described in the Cases"), were being used to defraud investors RRA Ponzi Scheme. ware of news stories that as a result of the Ponzi scheme mmenced investigations into over one-half of the attorneys +- 8. At or about e time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad S er fileda Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, v. tt W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the ck Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi Scheme investors. +- 9. viewing the Razorback Complaint, I learned that the Razorback Complaint detailed th e of the Epstein Cases (i.e.. the cases being litigated against me by to defraud investors in the Ponzi Scheme; including, but not limited to, improper discovery practices and other methods to bolster the cases. +- 10. Prior to my filing the initial Complaint in the Action, I also became aware that the Federal government filed an Information against Scott Rothstein, which included allegations of RRA as an "Enterprise" in which Rothstein and his yet unidentified co-conspirators engaged in a racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, mail and wire fraud conspiracy, and wire fraud, and specifically alleged that (a) potential investors were defrauded by Rothstein and other co-conspirators who falsely advised that confidential + +settlement agreements were available for purchase, when the settlement agreements offered were fabricated; (b) the fabricated settlements agreements were allegedly available in amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars and could be purchased at a discount and repaid to the investors at face value over time; (c) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized the offices of RRA and the offices of other co-conspirators to convince potential investors of the legitimacy of the and success of the law firm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity in these fictitious settlements; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salaries and bonuses, and to acquire larger and more elaborate office space and equipment in order to enrich the personal wealth of persons employed by and associated with the RRA Enterprise. + +1. 11. Prior to filing the initial Complaint in the Action, consistent with the allegations made by the press, in the Razorback Complaint, and in the Rothstein Information, it was clear that the activity in the Epstein Cases being litigated by Edwards intensified substantially during the short six (6) months during which [REDACTED] was a partner at RRA from April 2009 through the end of October 2009. Furthermore, during that six (6)-month period, questionable discovery like that detailed in the Razorback Complaint had taken place in the Epstein Cases being litigated against me by Edwards, including [REDACTED] noticing the depositions of famous dignitaries and celebrities such as Bill Clinton and David Copperfield. However, the plaintiffs in the Epstein Cases had made no allegations of improper conduct against them implicating any celebrities or dignitaries. +2. 12. Equally consistent with the allegations in the press and in the Razorback Complaint that the Epstein Cases were being deliberately misused for purposes unrelated to the litigation in order to lure investors into the Ponzi Scheme is the fact that on July 24, 2009, [REDACTED] filed a two hundred thirty-four (234) page, one fifty-six (156) count federal complaint against me on behalf of a plaintiff, LM, for whom [REDACTED] was already prosecuting a case against me in state court involving the same matters alleged in the federal complaint. The complaint was filed in federal court, but was never served on me or prosecuted, leading me to conclude that the only reason it was filed was to enhance the case files shown at the offices of RRA to potential investors in the Ponzi Scheme. +3. 13. Also while a partner at RRA, [REDACTED] filed a motion in Federal court in which he requested that the court order me to post a fifteen million dollar bond in the *Jane Doe* case. This case, according to the Razorback Complaint, was being touted at that same time to investors in the Ponzi Scheme. In connection with that motion, [REDACTED] filed papers discussing my net worth and filed supplemental papers purporting to list in great detail my vehicles, planes and other items of substantial value, all at a time when, according to the accounts in the press, the Information and the Razorback Complaint, the Ponzi Scheme was unraveling and the need for new investors in the Ponzi Scheme was becoming urgent. The court rejected the Motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." + +(15th Jud. Cir. Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB DE-931 ¶¶ 5-13.) + +#### DEPOSITION TESTIMONY + +A. Deposition—March 23, 2010 + +testified as follows: + +Did he ever call you to communicate with you, call you either by phone, video conference, in any fashion to discuss any aspect of the cases that you had against Jeffrey Epstein? + +A: He has communicated about various, about legal issues related to t commented about the case to me on very few occasions but I would times. well as ess than three + +(Tr. at 112:7-16.) + +Q: All right. Do you remember a third occasion that he s occasion, cases? C ou regarding Epstein related + +A: Anything else that he ever spoke with me about li a ly\_ pstein related issues is attorneyclient and work-product privileged informs • not going to divulge. + +St> Q: All right. And when you got in ( o , Mr. Rothstein was there? + +(Tr. at 116:21-117:3.) + +A: Yes. + +Q: Mr. Adler? + +C + +A: Yes. + +Q: There was, eone n the telephone who you don't recall? + +A: Yes. + +Q: Oka there anyone else present? + +A: No t I remember. + +Q: Okay. Was, were there any investigators, was Mr. Jenne or Mr. Fisten present? + +A: No. + +Q: So, it was, you, Rothstein, Adler, and someone on the phone; that's it? + +A: From what I remember. + +Q: How long did the meeting last? + +A: I don't know how long the meeting lasted. + +Q: Five minutes or was it a substantially long meeting? + +A: Do you want how long I was in the meeting, I can give you an answer. How long the meeting lasted, I have no idea. + +Q: How long did the meeting last while you were present? + +A: Less than five minutes. + +Q: Was the value of any of the three cases discussed at all? + +A: No. O S + +Q: Did Mr. Rothstein, did Mr. Rothstein appear to be know out your cases? + +A: No. + +Q: Mr. Adler, was Mr. Adler someone that you 's ed the cases with on a somewhat regular basis ... not content. Was Mr. Adlpi gMeo that you had discussed these Epstein cases with prior to that meeting? + +A: Ycs. + +(MI March 23, 2010, Tr. at 12 + +Q: What lawyers, other were involved in the Epstein cases during the time you were associated with + +A: What do you mea ere involved?" I guess all. + +Q: What, w wyers actually worked on the file? I know Mr. Berger worked on the Epstein cases, + +A: In tted capacity, correct. + +Q: O . Mr. Adler I know attended Mr. Epstein's deposition, correct? + +A: Correct. + +March 23, 2010, Tr. at 230:15-231:1.) + +B. a' Deposition—October 10, 2013 + +testified as follows: + +Q: Okay. At the me, that you -- at the meetings that occurred with these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that — discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein ever discussed? + +A: I — I would assume so. + +Q: Well, I -- + +A: In meetings, that we were talking about, was Epstein discussed? + +Q: Yeah, I - I -- I assume, based upon the -- what we saw in the e-mails today i t is exactly the purpose of the meeting, correct? + +Oct. 10, 2013, Tr. at 205:9-22.) CO S + +A: Exactly, that was the purpose of the meeting. + +C. Deposition—November 10, 2017 + +testified as follows: + +Q: So there is some truth that Rothstein is weav bilk on documents, the flight log that was obtained by you as the lead trial lawygt he nding lawsuits? + +A: There is some truth in the pending 1 + +Q: No. I'm saying that what Rot doing — we all -- + +A: He used actual evidence fabricated story. + +Q: And the actual evident at as referred to here are these flight logs that you as the lead lawyer obtained d brou back to the Rothstein firm, right? + +A: I maintain evid for all of my cases at the Rothstein firm where I worked, yes. + +Q: That's onfirming. + +A: Do ar that Rothstein gained access to it and used it to support his fairytale? It + +(EMI ov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 163:20-164:14.) + +Q: Were you reporting to Mr. Adler in how to represent the three Rothstein clients — the three ladies — on how to prosecute the Epstein matters? + +A: Well, this email is dated April 8th, 2009, so I had just started at the firm. I had just got there. Russ Adler was one of the only lawyers that I had known for years before I got to the firm. And Russ Adler handled sexual abuse cases. So, especially in the beginning, I talked to Russ about how to kind of navigate through the complications with Jeffrey Epstein and with the type of defense that was going on. So this just appears that Wayne Black and Russ Adler — Wayne was the investigator -- that they were talking also about how to -- what we needed to do in the investigation. Yeah, Russ was definitely involved then. He didn't do much in the day-to-day, so I don't want to say anything to that. + +Q: I understand. But I'm talking about on April 8th, 2009, it looks to me like he's giving you instructions on what to do. Do you agree? + +A: Not giving me instructions on what to do. I mean, he's telling me bring Marc Nurik the non-prosecution agreement, is the instruction. + +Nov. 10,2017, Tr. at 259:22-260:22) + +Q: Did you become aware of the fact that your Epstein-related files a t in time had been requested by Scott Rothstein? + +Q: How did you become aware of that? + +A: I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +C Q: Was there any explanation offered as to o othstein wanted ) to see the Epsteinrelated files? + +A: Yes. + +A: That if these cases went to trial, ant try the cases with me. + +Q: He who? + +A: He, Scott Rothstein, w red to tithe case with me. That's the explanation that I was given. + +Nov. 10,2017 r. at 3 :14-322:2.) + +Q: You were emp ee, in your mind, and he was the lawyer ultimately at the firm responsible for th ee clients, true? + +A: Th equity p ty lawyers at the firm. They all work for him. Hundreds of files. He's still the e firm, so they are the firm's files. They are not -- + +i.iu rstand. You told me earlier. And I didn't realize that, that the interest that PA had in three files, you gave up to Mr. Rothstein and became a salary employee, essentially. + +A: Gave up to RRA. + +Q: Mr. Rothstein's firm, correct? + +A: Right. We've established this. + +Q: And so that Mr. Rothstein was the lawyer at that firm as the -- one of two shareholders who was ultimately responsible for the three Epstein matters? equity + +A: For every case in the entire firm, including those -- + +Q Including the three Epstein matters? + +A: Every case, yeah. + +Nov. 10,2017, Tr. at 338:10-339:7.) + +#### IV. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY + +Rothstein testified as follows in this case: + +Q: You never spoke to Brad about this case? + +A + +os A: I didn't say that, but I had a lot more interaction ... If y. . Ik t e people in the firm, if they are honest with you, they'll tell you my interacti more significant with Russ Adler, probably more so because he was a co-co t. . f mine. My interaction with Russ was far greater by many, many percents o r i raction with Brad, and then you go down the line. I had more interaction wt er than I did with Mr. Fistos, more interaction with Jaffe than I did with Mr. d so on. + +(Rothstein's June 14,2012, Tr. at 23:24-24. + +Q: Right. How did you know at t and you said you were goi was the case that you co en you said these investors wanted to investigate a fake settlement, how did you know that this case + +A: From talking to all the p at I just said, Adler, Fistos, Jaffe, =, Mr. the extent that I si ke to him about it. to + +Q: Did you about the case? + +A: I don ific recollection one way or the other. I remember speaking to him at least he day or the day of or the day before the actual investor's due diligence was to what was going on. And I may have spoke to him, I know I spoke to Russ, may have spoke to him as well within a couple of days just prior to this due diligence se I was trying to at least get some information in my head that I could use when I was creating this story for the investors. + +(Rothstein's June 14,2012, Tr. at 25:12-26:6.) + +Q: Well, then explain to me. You testified earlier that what was important to the investors to see is that there was a real case, correct? + +A: Yes. + +Q: What did you look at or show them -- what did you look at, first of all, to see if it was, in fact, a real case? + +A: I knew it was a real case. + +Q: How did you know? + +A: Because my lawyers told me it was a real case. I believed them. + +Q: What lawyers told you that? + +A: I alr iacl told you it was a mixture of Russ and Jaffe and Fistos an nd Mr. I mean, I knew it was a real case. We had all these boxes, people really working on the file — O + +Q: How do you know -- + +A: —or they were pulling a hell of a scam on me. Not that 't erve it but [—] + +Q: How did you know, you just said you knew peoplg really hard on this case. Who do you know was working on the case? + +A: The only people that I knew for certain w rk1Kg on the case was Brad and Russ Adler was doing his supervisory hatever that was. But other than that, I don't know which other lawyers we Mr. I didn't get involved at that level. + +(Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 5'( 5 . ) + +Rothstein testified as fo ows • ? zorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein, 17th Jud. Cir. Case + +No. 062009CA062943AX i? CE: "e + +Q: You pull som kind of a flight manifest; do you recall that? + +A: Yeah. • m point in time I believe it was either Brad or Russ Adler pointed ou o e t one of the pieces of evidence they were using in the actual case was the flight d I actually used that to make a fairly big show. I found that those most of time in these cases the more significant our underlying investigation was and the more tan • izing it was, the more interested the investors got. We had that real piece of evidence and we used it to our advantage to attempt to secure the investor. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 59:14-25.) + +Q: Didn't you add some sensational names to the manifest that weren't there to start with? + +A: I did. I did. + +Q: Tell us about that + +A: There were I said that there were additional manifests — if I remember correctly, I said there were additional manifests that we had discovered containing Bill Clinton's name, Prince Andrew, all being shown flying with young girls on the plane. + +Q: And do you know whether — let me back up. The original manifests that were in evidence in the real case, didn't have those names on it? + +A: No, but it's interesting you bring that up because the way I came up with Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew was Mr. Adler and Mr. both told me on different occasions that the reason the case — when we were discussing the actual real case, the n it was becoming so, quote, unquote, tasty because they had information that he een flying Bill Clinton around and Prince Andrews around, the piece that was m fro the real case was the connection to the young girls. + +Q: The young girls — connection to the young girls was fiction, itC + +A: Not as far as Mr. Epstein is concerned but as far as the other p are concerned, yes. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12,2011, Tr. at 60:10-61:9.) + +Q: When you were asked — this morning about B know if you know you did that. You were paused. you really hesitated. I don't s, no, maybe so. On him you really + +A: On the question as whether or not h Id hive turned us in, you mean? + +Q: Whether he was a player or wjt,, iwwas involved and you didn't quite answer. + +A: Just because of the way at that level. There have absolutely done wh And then there w the middle. Ibeli d and socialized with him, I did not know that he was eople, Barry M, second he found out about it would appropriately — supposed to do from an ethical standpoint. le who I say would never do that. And then there are people in is probably in the middle. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 011, Tr. at 61:15-62:6.) + +understand. I'm not going to have you go through all 13 boxes, but I'm trying rame of reference. You're talking about a flight manifest or flight manifests for ate jets, right? + +A: Yes. This is a very small document. It may have been one or two pages. And I had it specifically set aside. I'd either ask Mr. Adler or Mr. to isolate the flight manifest. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 19,2011, Tr. at 2278:13-20) + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac tf 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr2 Primary: Scott®Iin ockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(S•Siltounselfor e Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea oulevard West Palm 33409 law Co-Coun endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9b83c3eaa3470f92bc352bbee4d27f7ad22f768 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095/EFTA02761095.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1683 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761095.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 41, + "chars": 72491, + "elapsed_seconds": 22.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF EIN'S APPENDIX IN \nSUPPORT OF HIS REVISED OMNIMIS ION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 363.10302734375 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 363.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DOCUMENTS AND FO TION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S \nCOMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 458.158 + ], + [ + 544.189208984375, + 458.158 + ], + [ + 544.189208984375, + 486.863037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Cited Nei erage: November 3-6, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 497.027 + ], + [ + 368.4792785644531, + 497.027 + ], + [ + 368.4792785644531, + 513.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 513.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 415.0211181640625, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 415.0211181640625, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 395.4850158691406, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 395.4850158691406, + 636.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 636.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. The Investors' Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 279.2485656738281, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 279.2485656738281, + 224.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 224.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Cited News Coverage: November", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 362.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 362.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 648.0 + ], + [ + 459.00213623046875, + 648.0 + ], + [ + 459.00213623046875, + 664.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 664.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Informati ,c te", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 383.396240234375, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 383.396240234375, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND A FFID GARDING \nPROBABLE CAUSE C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 542.9880981445312, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 542.9880981445312, + 265.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 265.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Deposition\u2014March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 343.5450134277344, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 343.5450134277344, + 291.8625183105469 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 291.8625183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. \nEpstein's Deposition\u2014January 25,2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 315.54498291015625, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 315.54498291015625, + 138.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 138.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 331.19830322265625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 331.19830322265625, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 347.67645263671875, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 347.67645263671875, + 229.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 229.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761095" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761136/EFTA02761136.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761136/EFTA02761136.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea5fc6caa1db16b77641d5489c72a9434e184937 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761136/EFTA02761136.md @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/ -PLAINTIFF MOTION TO RECONFIRM E PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES J. + +Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff • Pre-Trial Deadlines and states: ("Plaintiff') hereby responds to J. c ar "Defendant") Motion to Reconfirm Existing + +In his November 6, Hon for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pretrial Deadlines or, in the Alte tiTs• & e, Bifurcation of Trial, Plaintiff asked the Court: + +> If t o nce is granted, Plaintiff also requests that the current lines be reset based upon the new trial date, including the parties to file amended Exhibit and Witness Lists and ntify experts. + +(Motion I ontinuance, p. 8.) + +As the Court recognized in its November 14, 2017, Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance, there is currently "extreme uncertainty" of what issues will be tried and the Court's ultimate rulings on the parties' outstanding motions is critical to determine that. It is premature, therefore, to comply with the current pre-trial deadlines, including filing the Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions, and Verdict Forms, as those documents should focus on the issues that will be tried. In addition, the outcome of the pending Motions will likely lead to amendments of the parties' respective Exhibit and Witness Lists and further discovery. Plaintiff disagrees with Defendant's statement that the Court rejected all grounds raised for the continuance and that the parties must adhere to the current pre-trial schedule based on the December 5, 2017, trial date. + +For instance, if Defendant is allowed to conduct multiple "mini tri cases, then Plaintiff will need to conduct further discovery (incl depositions). Furthermore, Defendant's recently disclosed ex Defendant has changed his position regarding the rele connecting Defendant to Plaintiff, which requires of Plaintiff's own expert witness(es). In additi Discovery is granted, that could lead to flirt f the victims' ng 25 or more rt evidences that rinted or published media ety and the hiring and disclosure ain iff's Supplemental Motion to Compel ovcry and disclosures. + +Plaintiff recognizes that the specifically address his request der granting his Motion for Continuance does not the pretrial deadlines, and respectfully asks the Court to clarify its ruling and gra that request. Plaintiff further suggests that the parties comply with the timeframes set fort c the urt's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial (Exhibit A), which would CI • e the following pre-trial schedule: + +| Due Date | Days Provided by Trial Order | Deadline | +|----------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1/12/18 | 60 days prior to trial | DUE: Trial Exhibit Lists, Witness Lists, Expert Witness Lists and Expert Disclosures and Reports | +| 1/22/18 | 50 days prior to trial | DUE: Rebuttal Witness Lists | +| 2/12/18 | 30 days prior to trial | DEADLINE: To confer to discuss settlement, simplify the facts and issues, prepare a Pretrial Stipulation, list objections to exhibits, etc. | +| 2/21/18 | 20 days prior to trial | DUE: Pretrial Stipulation, Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms and Deposition Designations; DEADLINE: To have Daubert Motions heard | +| 3/2/18 | 10 days prior to trial | DEADLINE: To complete discovery; DUE: Counter Deposition Designations and Objections to Deposition Designations | + +Plaintiff did not request the extension of the p lines as a means to delay this matter as Defendant infers in his Motion to R xisting Pretrial Deadlines. Rather, because it is unclear what issues will be tri it i ply impossible to reasonably prepare for trial and adhere to the current pre-triunes Defendant will not be prejudiced by the extension of the pre-trial deadlin + +Accordingly, Plaintiff his request for an extension of the pm-trial deadlines as set forth herein and in his ori otion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-trial Deadlines and for the Co Defendant's Motion. + +O + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]A + +By: /0 Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many (FB Primary: tterlin Primary: Kara in Primary: An Secondary. nkr Second Seco, S service@linkrocklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein kl m w.com nkrocklaw.com 03) cklaw inkrocklaw.com linkrocklaw.com + +# E LI T + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnh 2139 Palm Beach Lakes t I ulev West Palm Beach, FL 33V mep©searcylaw. | & hipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. y Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| jsx@searcylaw.c | nisfaFLAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolateamRsea yla .com | kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com | +| Co-Counsel fbr Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Edwards | Co-Course! -Plainitfi J. Marc S. Nurik | +| J. wards Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 bradeevIlc.com | Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marcanuriklaw.com | +| staff.efile@,pathotojustice.com Co-Counselor lendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. and L M, individually, Defendant(s). individually, + +# CO S ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on July 6, 2O17 on Counter-Plaintiff, J. , Motion to Set Cause for Trial and the Court's Motion to Determine Nee or Discovery/Motion Scheduling Order and the court having reviewed the Motion, heard argument and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 5, 2O17, at 9:30 a.m., (1O days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 2O5 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 334O1. + +#### II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses.of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - 1. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and +- 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. + +D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall confer and: + +- 1. discuss settlement; +- 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; +- 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; +- 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. + +E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the dc; )\*counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + +- 1. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubed Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. +- 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; +- 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; +- 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; +- 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; +- 6. a statement of estimated trial time; +- 7. names of attorneys to try case; +- 8. ia1 umber of peremptory challenges per party; and ,, . &al ti party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to pporting authority, as schedules attached to the Stipulation. + +F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. + +G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. + +#### H. DISCOVERY. Unless permitted by court order, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR TRIAL. ABSENT A TRUE EMERGENCY, FAILURE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR CONTINUANCE. + +- I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pretrial conference. +- J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to trial, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +- K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +- L. PREMARICING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. +- M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than trial, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +#### III. MEDIATION + +- d +- 1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. +- 2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE, all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. +- 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. +- 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing a lDesignation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 23:21-24:17 | | | | +| 25:16-24 | | | | +| 26:8-27:3 | | | | +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | | | | +| 31:20-23 | | | | +| 36:6-16 | | | | +| 38:18-24 | | | | +| 43:4-10 | | | | +| 45:13-25 | | | | +| 53:4-54:4 | | | | +| 54:9-10 | | | | +| 54:14-22 | | | | +| 55:10-21 | | | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | | | | +| 58:11-15 | | | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | | | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| 107:11-112:1 | | | | +| 112:7-10 | | | | +| 112:12-114:10 | | | | +| 115:6-118:20 | | | | +| 118:23-120:22 | | | | +| 122:24-123:24 | | | | +| 125:2-5 | | | | +| 125:14-19 | | | | +| 126:1-127:8 | | | | +| 128:7-11 | | | | +| 128:16-129:7 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | | | | +| 158:4-160:2 | | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | | | | +| 164:21-166:1 | | | | +| 166:22-167:5 | | | | +| 174:24-175:16 | | | | +| 175:22-176:4 | | | | +| 180:5-20 | | | | +| 182:5-25 | | | | +| 183:16-184:3 | | | | +| 185:2-186:17 | | | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | | | | +| 198:2-6 | | | | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | | | | +| 229:19-24 | | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | +| 233:13-234:6 | | | | +| 234:16-23 | | | | +| 235:8-13 | | | | +| 235:15 | | | | +| 235:17-21 | | | | +| 236:8-15 | | | | +| 238:24-239:2 | | | | +| 239:18-243:21 | | | | +| 245:4-245:22 | | | | +| 246:12-247:11 | | | | +| 247:18-23 | | | | +| 248:22-249:7 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | | | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | +| 283:5-284:2 | | | | +| 286:12-287:6 | | | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +2. ██████████ J. ██████████ : May 15, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:13-14 | | | | +| 5:23-6:2 | | | | +| 6:11-19 | | | | +| 7:3-20 | | | | +| 7:25-8:7 | | | | +| 9:3-7 | | | | +| 11:8-10 | | | | +| 11:21-12:3 | | | | +| 12:10-13 | | | | +| 16:4-15 | | | | +| 17:16-18:16 | | | | +| 18:20-19:4 | | | | +| 22:24-23:5 | | | | +| 23:25-24:15 | | | | +| 24:19-25:4 | | | | +| 25:9-12 | | | | +| 25:19-29:1 | | | | +| 29:11-22 | | | | +| 30:2 | | | | +| 30:6 | | | | +| 30:25-31:20 | | | | +| 36:9-37:18 | | | | +| 38:13-22 | | | | +| 41:3-16 | | | | +| 42:5-22 | | | | +| 43:12-17 | | | | +| 44:1-13 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 45:6-17 | | | | +| 46:9-47:2 | | | | +| 47:14-23 | | | | +| 48:4-23 | | | | +| 49:7-19 | | | | +| 55:10-57:8 | | | | +| 57:15-58:5 | | | | +| 60:20-61:16 | | | | +| 62:6-10 | | | | +| 70:24-71:20 | | | | +| 72:11-25 | | | | +| 75:14-76:8 | | | | + +3. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] : October 10, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 130:12-25 | | | | +| 132:25-133:10 | | | | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| 139:6-22 | | | | +| 143:1-144:9 | | | | +| 152:11-153:14 | | | | +| 205:9-22 | | | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | + +4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:23-6:1 | | | | +| 8:4-7 | | | | +| 13:9-14:8 | | | | +| 19:7-11 | | | | +| 19:17-20:1 | | | | +| 20:12-13 | | | | +| 23:4-6 | | | | +| 23:8 | | | | +| 23:10-19 | | | | +| 23:24-25 | | | | +| 25:6-26:15 | | | | +| 28:14-17 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 28:19-29:14 | | | | +| 29:22-31:7 | | | | +| 31:15-18 | | | | +| 31:20-32:1 | | | | +| 32:3-11 | | | | +| 32:25-33:12 | | | | +| 33:14-21 | | | | +| 34:3-35:3 | | | | +| 36:10-37:3 | | | | +| 37:8-39:2 | | | | +| 39:5-20 | | | | +| 43:2-3 | | | | +| 43:25-44:3 | | | | +| 46:16-20 | | | | +| 46:22 | | | | +| 47:3-6 | | | | +| 47:8-11 | | | | +| 47:18-21 | | | | +| 48:4-8 | | | | +| 48:13-16 | | | | +| 48:19-49:1 | | | | +| 49:13-21 | | | | +| 49:24-51:4 | | | | +| 51:15-17 | | | | +| 51:20-52:17 | | | | +| 53:8-11 | | | | +| 53:13-24 | | | | +| 54:11-55:1 | | | | +| 55:5-22 | | | | +| 57:2-10 | | | | +| 57:15-25 | | | | +| 59:11-60:5 | | | | +| 60:18-20 | | | | +| 60:22-24 | | | | + +5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 17:2-5 | | | | +| 17:12-14 | | | | +| 17:16-25 | | | | +| 19:16-20:8 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 20:23–21:5 | | | | + +# 6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, I7'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 09462943) + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 58:8-17 | | | | +| 58:21-60:18 | | | | +| 60:20-62:20 | | | | + +# 7. Scott Rothstein; June 14. 2012 + +| | Completeness/Counter | | | Response to | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----|---|---------------| +| Designation 4:2-5 5:11-16 5:23-6:22 6:25-9:9 | /Cross Designation | rx, | | ns Objections | +| 9:12-10:19 16:3-17:17 18:19-19:3 19:24-21:4 21:17-22:9 22:22-25:6 | S | \1 | 1 | | +| 25:8-27:23 28:12-31:16 32:8-33:12 33:25-3 34: - 3 3-1 3 • :5 5:2-7 46:5-19 47:17-49:6 51:4-53:22 54:2-55:7 55:12-57:2 59:13-62:19 63:13-14 63:16-21 | Cr - | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 68:24-69:8 | | | | +| 69:21-22 | | | | +| 69:24 | | | | +| 70:17-71:22 | | | | +| 76:8-77:20 | | | | +| 79:10-24 | | | | +| 80:12-23 | | | | +| 83:2-16 | | | | +| 85:18-23 | | | | +| 86:4-89:10 | | | | +| 92:4-93:14 | | | | +| 94:3-15 | | | | +| 95:1-20 | | | | +| 98:21-99:22 | | | | +| 104:4-12 | | | | +| 105:7-107:11 | | | | +| 110:12-19 | | | | +| 110:21-111:12 | | | | +| 112:3-12 | | | | +| 115:10-116:19 | | | | +| 117:14-118:2 | | | | +| 118:14-120:4 | | | | + +8. ██████████ S. Adler; April 20, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:14-5:12 | | | | +| 11:11-23 | | | | +| 12:16-14:14 | | | | +| 14:20-18:6 | | | | +| 18:20-20:1 | | | | +| 23:4-25:7 | | | | +| 25:21-27:10 | | | | +| 27:14-21 | | | | +| 30:10-32:17 | | | | +| 32:24-33:4 | | | | +| 35:9-17 | | | | +| 38:18-41:18 | | | | +| 42:13-43:22 | | | | +| 44:1-47:8 | | | | +| 53:15-56:21 | | | | +| 57:5-58:14 | | | | + +| | Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| | 63:10-25 | | | | +| | 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| | 77:21-78:4 | | | | +| | 78:6-17 | | | | +| | 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| | 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| | 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| | 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| | 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| | 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| | 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| | 96:1-8 | | | | +| | 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| | 101:19-102:7 | | | | +| | 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| | 106:4-23 | | | | +| | 106:25-107:4 | | | | +| | 107:15-23 | | | | +| | 108:1-5 | | | | +| | 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| | 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| | 124:20-126:14 | | | | + +9. Adler; October 28, 2010 (In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.. U.S.D.C. CaseNo. 10-2612- BR ), + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:1-5:10 | | | | +| 9:5-12:14 | | | | +| 16:22-20:12 | | | | +| 22:9-24:22 | | | | +| 25:3-26:20 | | | | +| 39:9-51:5 | | | | +| 51:10-13 | | | | +| 51:20-52:8 | | | | +| 52:11-14 | | | | +| 52:19-63:15 | | | | +| 70:21-75:6 | | | | +| 75:9-78:7 | | | | +| 80:14-81:25 | | | | +| 83:22-88:24 | | | | +| 100:18-105:22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 105:25-106:3 | | | | +| 107:1-108:18 | | | | +| 111:6-121:18 | | | | +| 124:7-18 | | | | +| 124:23-127:19 | | | | +| 129:4-12 | | | | +| 131:5-134:25 | | | | +| 144:4-152:20 | | | | +| 154:4-155:17 | | | | +| 158:19-159:18 | | | | +| 161:22-164:14 | | | | +| 167:13-168:7 | | | | +| 169:6-170:2 | | | | +| 174:21-175:17 | | | | +| 179:23-188:14 | | | | +| 198:4-199:7 | | | | + +10. ██████████ **Kretschmar; February 11, 2011** + +Entire transcript + +11. **Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:10-11 | | | | +| 9:21-22 | | | | +| 11:2-9 | | | | +| 11:22-12:17 | | | | +| 13:7-14:1 | | | | +| 14:22-15:5 | | | | +| 15:16-19:2 | | | | +| 19:21-24:15 | | | | +| 25:6-26:7 | | | | +| 27:11-28:25 | | | | +| 29:7-20 | | | | +| 30:10-31:9 | | | | +| 45:22-46:4 | | | | +| 46:24-47:10 | | | | +| 47:14-51:1 | | | | +| 51:4 | | | | +| 51:6-17 | | | | +| 52:1-53:22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 53:24-54:6 | | | | +| 65:18-66:2 | | | | +| 67:16-23 | | | | + +12. Abraxas ██████████ Discala; May 25, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-21 | | | | +| 7:13-19 | | | | +| 7:25-8:10 | | | | +| 8:20-9:5 | | | | +| 10:9-18 | | | | +| 10:22-11:6 | | | | +| 28:5-14 | | | | +| 28:17-20 | | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | | +| 30:5-25 | | | | +| 45:13-22 | | | | +| 47:13-22 | | | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | | | +| 88:22-89:1 | | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | | +| 90:8-23 | | | | +| 91:7-11 | | | | +| 91:14-92:16 | | | | +| 93:17-18 | | | | +| 93:21-94:6 | | | | +| 95:1-17 | | | | +| 99:25-100:11 | | | | +| 101:5-11 | | | | +| 103:10-14 | | | | +| 107:7-108:3 | | | | +| 108:21-23 | | | | +| 116:19-117:10 | | | | +| 117:13 | | | | +| 117:15-118:12 | | | | +| 119:10-15 | | | | +| 123:10-18 | | | | +| 127:6-9 | | | | +| 127:12-128:12 | | | | +| 128:24-129:4 | | | | +| 130:12-18 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 130:25-131:13 | | | | +| 132:13-25 | | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | | | | +| 136:6-12 | | | | +| 141:7-19 | | | | +| 141:21-23 | | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | | | | +| 152:4-10 | | | | +| 152:18-20 | | | | +| 152:22-153:5 | | | | +| 154:4-14 | | | | +| 155:12-25 | | | | +| 156:7-21 | | | | +| 158:17-159:24 | | | | +| 160:3-8 | | | | +| 160:13-161:5 | | | | +| 161:10-11 | | | | +| 176:8-22 | | | | +| 179:5-11 | | | | +| 180:22-182:2 | | | | +| 184:2-11 | | | | +| 184:19-185:11 | | | | +| 185:16-22 | | | | +| 186:5-187:14 | | | | +| 187:16-189:15 | | | | +| 191:6-192:13 | | | | +| 195:7-196:11 | | | | +| 199:24-200:3 | | | | +| 200:5-12 | | | | +| 200:19-21 | | | | +| 200:23-201:16 | | | | +| 203:16-21 | | | | +| 204:3-7 | | | | +| 205:8-10 | | | | +| 205:12-206:2 | | | | +| 206:4-11 | | | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | | +| 208:7-13 | | | | +| 208:16-18 | | | | +| 212-9-213:22 | | | | +| 214:24-25 | | | | +| 215:6-9 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 246:7-247:22 | | | | +| 248:7-249:7 | | | | +| 252:10-253:10 | | | | +| 254:6-12 | | | | +| 254:19-256:4 | | | | +| 258:16-259:25 | | | | +| 260:7-12 | | | | +| 260:24-261:13 | | | | +| 275:14-276:20 | | | | +| 277:2-6 | | | | +| 277:16-21 | | | | +| 281:19-283:3 | | | | +| 283:10-284:9 | | | | +| 284:15-25 | | | | +| 285:21-23 | | | | +| 286:4-10 | | | | +| 286:14-18 | | | | +| 286:20-21 | | | | +| 290:4-13 | | | | +| 356:2-18 | | | | +| 356:23-357:7 | | | | +| 357:16-358:11 | | | | +| 358:15-16 | | | | +| 365:20-366:6 | | | | +| 366:8-22 | | | | + +13. [REDACTED] : October 12, 2017 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-11:22 | | | | +| 14:10-18 | | | | +| 14:21-15:12 | | | | +| 15:15-16:2 | | | | +| 16:7-10 | | | | +| 16:14-18 | | | | +| 17:18-19:16 | | | | +| 20:22-25:17 | | | | +| 26:24-28:8 | | | | +| 28:11-29:4 | | | | +| 34:2-16 | | | | +| 34:18-35:6 | | | | +| 45:3-47:19 | | | | + +| | Completeness/Counter | | Response to | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------|-------------| +| Designation 47:23-49:21 51:13-21 53:14-54:15 54:17-56:8 56:21-57:3 57:9-13 57:15-58:9 86:8-22 91:1492:10 | /Cross Designation | Objections | Objections | +| 108:21-109:2 116:16-22 117:7-118:7 120:6-23 121:6-122:23 | | | 41kAlk" | +| 123:8-124:23 | | C5 Asa. | Y | + +Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to amend st ent these designations, including to designate portions of J. N 2 , 2017, deposition transcript and any additional depositions taken in this or other + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +| SERVICE LIST | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]A + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many (FB Primary: tt lin Primary: Kara in Primary: An Secondary. nkr Second Seco, kl in w.com nkrocklaw.com 03) cklaw m inkrocklaw.com inkrocklaw.com S service®Iinkrocklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +## E LI T + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761148/EFTA02761148.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761148/EFTA02761148.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10508f5d04061a8fcc0c45a6d44a383a45eae615 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761148/EFTA02761148.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,665 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761148.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 60316, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 62.852 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 62.852 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 105.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 105.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE 114Z EPSTEIN'S \nDEPOSITION DESIGN O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 310.952 + ], + [ + 474.40521240234375, + 310.952 + ], + [ + 474.40521240234375, + 340.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 340.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 601.8299999999999 + ], + [ + 282.13200000000006, + 601.8299999999999 + ], + [ + 282.13200000000006, + 617.22 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 617.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, I7'h Judicial \nCircuit Case No. 09462943)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 161.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 161.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. Scott Rothstein; June 14. 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 265.79229736328125, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 265.79229736328125, + 284.9830627441406 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 284.9830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12. Abraxas \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 Discala; May 25, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 306.61199999999997, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 306.61199999999997, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 175.76999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 77.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 77.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E LI T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.82232666015625, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.82232666015625, + 436.10302734375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 436.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761148" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57e313272ee6d21ec8f39c932a265c8705a3036f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODU IC,c)t 99M NON-PARTIES + +J. M, by and through his a Ounsel, files his Objection, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351(b the y Epstein's Notice of Production from Non-Parties dated November 13, 2017 to the following: + +- 1. Robert C. Josefs +- 2. Charles Lich +- 3. Spencer Kuvin +- 4. Theodore +- 5. Adam Ho +- 6. +- 7. +- 8. Isi G' is Cote erger + +THE CLERK IS HEREBY INSTRUCTED NOT TO ISSUE THE REQUESTED SUBPOENAS + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Objection to Notice of Production from Non-Parties +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 17th day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmecann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmecann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Objection to Notice of Production from Non-Parties +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Objection to Notice of Production from Non-Parties +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1ba20ec174075e65c9358a08ae3e46da26f8796 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164/EFTA02761164.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761164.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2895, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 75.25699999999999 + ], + [ + 540.525390625, + 75.25699999999999 + ], + [ + 540.525390625, + 117.9925537109375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 117.9925537109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODU IC,c)t 99M NON-PARTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 337.416 + ], + [ + 495.2616882324219, + 337.416 + ], + [ + 495.2616882324219, + 352.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 352.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 153.09 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761164" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf2248c5b43c2cdf0f285515194fab6088095a52 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY N'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADL ARDS' REQUEST FOR AN0.203 JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT DA STATUTES SECTIONS 90.202k + +PlaintifdCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey ( lics\(,` r pstein"), objects to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff rEdw u for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 90.202 and 90.203, and std + +This Court must request for judicial notice of Epstein's New York State Sex Offender reg' tt on information pursuant to the Florida Evidence Code. Although asks this C to e ercise its discretion to take judicial notice of the New York registration, it does not squ y II under matters which this Court may take judicial notice. Moreover, sections 90.401 and 90.403, Florida Statutes (2017), preclude the registration from admissibility because it is wholly irrelevant to any claim to be tried in this matter and is presented solely to unfairly prejudice or inflame the jury against Epstein. Likewise, the registration information is akin to + +#### INTRODUCTION + +evidence that is precluded by sections 90.404, 90.405, 90.609, and 90.610, Florida Statutes (2017). Therefore, this Court must deny the transparent request to prejudice the jury. + +#### RECORD FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE + +The only issues for trial are framed by the pleadings in this lawsuit: (1) Epstein's Complaint and damages against Defendant Scott Rothstein and (2) Counterclaim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. There is no issue in any Complaint or Co aim as to this issue in Epstein's Complaint, Counterclaim for malicious pro t r either party's Affirmative Defenses pled or proposed. Epstein's status as registered in the state of New York. The Court wilO i + +#### M EMORAND + +## Sections 90.401 and 90.403 Florida Statut A\ + +The New York State Sex Offender regi S irss "r oration is neither relevant nor probative to any issue raised by Epstein, nor an t...emn f proof that must be met by in his malicious prosecution Countercla prejudice the jury before it has to file his action against relation to any o d, this request is merely a transparent attempt to ate opportunity to determine if Epstein had probable cause Whether or not Epstein is a registered sex offender has zero ges sought by Epstein against Defendant Rothstein. Likewise, and significant to Counterclaim, whether Epstein is a registered sex offender does not prove any el he malicious prosecution claim that has raised. See, e.g., Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1994). + +Contrary to recent characterizations of the lawsuit filed by Epstein against (on which the malicious prosecution claim is based), Epstein did not allege that brought false tort claims. Rather, in December 2009, Epstein alleged that Scott Rothstein's partner, exploited the civil tort lawsuits against Epstein for the purposes of luring investors into the Pont scheme that was being carried out under the auspices of Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler by attempting to conduct unnecessary and irrelevant discovery, by filing duplicative actions, and by other similar actions outlined more fully in Epstein's Complaint against + +One clear example of litigation tactics that led Epstein to perce nnection between and Rothstein's Ponzi scheme was ' motion al Epstein was fraudulently transferring assets and seeking a Court order requiring • ost a \$15 million bond to secure a potential future judgment on the tort claims. extensively and publicly pled facts pertaining to Epstein's wealth, c 17 "billionaire" status — which Ilkil c were reasonably perceived by Epstein, once the try /S hire scheme, to be designed to entice existing inv ilsen o , more investors to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme by citing Epstein's wealth. The "evr ce" could supply the court, however, showed that Epstein merely transf i a few automobiles. There was nothing fraudulent in those transfers and the value f the a tomobiles was minor relative to Epstein's overall wealth. United States District Jud 4pneth A. Marra determined that motion seeking the \$15 million bond waQtirely devoid of evidence of [Epstein's] alleged fraudulent transfers." (See Order, D.E. t0, c o. 08-CIV-80119, Exhibit A.) ame out about the Rothstein Ponzi + +ore, even if this Court considers that the evidence might be relevant in some remote way to the claims for trial, the registration information should still be excluded under section 90.403 which provides, "[r]elevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." Florida courts have excluded evidence of prior convictions in analogous situations, finding that any probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Horton v. State, 943 So. 2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Likewise, here, any remotely probative value is far outweighed by the prejudicial nature of the evidence, as well as the likelihood that it would confuse the true issues in this lawsuit and mislead the jury as to the subject of the claims that are being tried. + +#### Sections 90.404 and 90.405, Florida Statutes + +Additionally, the registration information is inadmissible uncle t 0 90.404 and 90.405, Florida Statutes, because its only purpose is to disparage Eps m s 0 cter. Florida law is clear that "[e]vidence of a person's character or a trait of chara 's in'llefmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion" except in limited circumstances not present here. § 90.404(1), Fla. Stat. (2017); see g SS?, gi .405(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) ("When character or a trait of character of a person is n 1 element of a charge, claim, or defense proof may be made of specific instances ton's re conduct.") (emphasis added). + +Request for hid' 1 t E is nothing more than a backdoor attempt to inject irrelevant and prejudicial ch See, e.g., Pandtda v. Fond nor particular ph Bence into the trial, contrary to well-settled Florida law. So. 358, 360 (Fla. 1940) ("neither [a witness's] general character ter can be gone into'"). + +## Secti 609 and 90.610. Florida Statutes + +4 'stration information is also inadmissible under sections 90.609 and 90.610, Florida Statutes, because it is irrelevant to Epstein's truthfulness and goes far beyond the bare fact he entered a plea agreement. See § 90.609, Fla. Stat. (2017) (character evidence used to impeach a witness "may refer only to character relating to truthfulness"). + +While section 90.610 permits a party to impeach a witness by evidence if the witness was convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, Epstein's registration information falls outside this narrow category of impeachment evidence by addressing the nature of his crime (a sexual offense). Impeachment under section 90.610 is strictly limited to the fact the witness was convicted of a felony or crime involving dishonesty, and the number of convictio s. Further details, including the nature of the crime, are off limits. See Rogers v. State, 964 21, 222- 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("[I]mpeachment by prior convictions is 'restricte nnining if the witness has previously been convicted of a crime, and if so, how many Int otte v. Pomeroy, 497 So. 2d 1275, 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("[Q]uestioning is ed hether the witness has ever been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dis t I Ite witness may be required to give the number of convictions, but if he answers t no further questions may be asked. In particular, the nature of the crimes may ngP ji ed.") (emphasis added); Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1346, 13 elicitation of the nature of the crit4 compensate for the possible p DCA 1983) ("Neither statute permits the e any additional light on his credibility would not I effect on the minds of the jurors.") (emphasis added). + +### Sections 90.202 aid c 9 4203. Florida Statutes + +Finally, a matter of 90.20 cl em that the New York State Sex Offender registration information is is Court may take judicial notice pursuant to the procedure set out in section Statutes. However, the substantive part of the Florida Evidence Code that addresses matters as to which this Court "may" take judicial notice does not refer to or authorize judicial notice of out-of-state sex offender registration information under the circumstances of this case. Rather, items that are typical for judicial notice pertain to acts of Congress, constitutional or statutory law, the Federal Register, laws of foreign nations, official acts of one of the three Judicial Notice. WHEREFORE, Epstein respectfully ?'itc" t this Court deny Request for + +branches of government, court records, rules of court, county charters, the Florida Administrative Code, ordinances, or facts not subject to dispute because generally known within the court's territorial jurisdiction, or official seals of governmental agencies or United States departments. There is no listing for out-of-state sex offender registration information. + +#### CONCLUSION + +As supported by the pleadings and the record in this lawsuit, whether or Lein is a registered sex offender in the state of New York is not probative of any mat • i for this trial. Rather, this consistent attempt by to re-litigate his closed c i o ions and interject mini-trials in this matter must be rejected. The purpose is i ncoV • n the Florida Evidence Code, specifically sections 90.401, 90.403, 90.404, 90.40 by attempting to take advantage of the jury's negati . and 90.610, Florida Statutes, to such information. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bXI). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fiu] + +By. /s/ Scott .1 Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr2 Primary: Scott®Iin ockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(S'/Si e Counsel fo r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea oulevard West Palm 33409 law .c m Co-Cou endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseloiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRa✓ + +JANE DOE NO. 2, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +I + +Related cases: + +08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 + +C + +This cause is before the Court u t • ffJane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer a ppointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165). Defendant Jeffrey stein IP a response in opposition to the motion (DE 198), and Plaintiff filed a reply (D 1 e motion is now fully briefed and ripe for review. + +P1 otion argues that Defendant is fraudulently transferring his assets with the specific in t to defeat any judgment that might be entered against him in this and other similar cases. Plaintiff therefore seeks an order enjoining Defendant from fraudulent transfers of his assets, appointing a receiver to take charge of Defendant's property, and requiring Defendant to post a \$15 million dollar bond against any potential judgment in this case. + +The relief sought by Plaintiff is injunctive and, essentially, amounts to a prejudgment writ of attachment. v. Cascade Intern., Inc. 21 F.3d 1520, 1530 (11th Cir. 1994) (vacating district court's preliminary injunction freezing defendant's assets). "No relief of this character has been thought justified in the long history of equity jurisprudence." De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 222-23 (1945). + +"Preliminary injunctive relief freezing a defendant's assets in order to es with which to satisfy a potential judgment for money damages is simply n ate exercise of a federal district court's authority." =, 21 F.3d at 153 "[i]t is entirely settled by a long and unbroken line of Florida cases that in an at law for money damages, there is simply no judicial authority for an order requirin controversy into the registry of the court ... or ind defendant's unrestricted assets prior to the Realty Assoc., Ltd. v. Mladen, 511 So it of the amount in straint upon the use of a ent." Id. at 1531, gtAtgt Konover (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). + +In Florida, an injunction his assets prior to the conclusto So.2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d tered to prevent a party from using or disposing of egal action. Briceno v. Bryden Investments, Ltd., 973 8). See also SME Racks, Inc. v. Sistemas Mecanicos Para, Electroni S. ed.Appx. 502 (111° Cir. 2007) (affirming district's court's denial of prelimin on to freeze defendant's assets); Proctor v. Eason,651 So.2d 1301, 1301-02 (Fla. 2d D 1995) (Defendant not required to deposit funds in court registry prior to final judgment where Plaintiff failed to show unavailability of an adequate remedy at law and the likelihood of irreparable harm, two elements essential to entry of an injunction); Lawhon v. Mason, 611 So.2d 1367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (quashing trial court order requiring defendant to + +give plaintiffs ten days notice prior to the transfer of any assets in excess of \$500). + +Additionally, as the Eleventh Circuit explained in + +In actions at law, plaintiffs in Florida possess an adequate, exclusive prejudgment remedy for the sequestration of assets under the attachment statute, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 76.04-.05 (West 1987), provided that they can satisfy the enumerated statutory grounds for relief. Accordingly, the use of injunctive relief as a substitute for the remedy of prejudgment attachment, with its attendant safeguards, is improper. + +21 F.3d at 1531 (emphasis added). Here, Plaintiff did not move to amend hemp laint to allege a claim under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act ("FUFTA" t. § 726.101, et m' Rather, she filed the present motion for injunctive relief. Even d moved to amend her complaint, it is certainly not clear that she could meet t statutory elements. Plaintiff's motion is premised on the contention that s fraudulently transferring his assets. However, Plaintiff's motion is entirely i evidence of Defendant's alleged fraudulent transfers. The Court declines n e that Defendant is fraudulently transferring assets based upon the adverse inf r d upon by Plaintiff. Plaintiff's supplemental filing regarding the titles of approxi of Defendant's vehicles is clearly de minimis particularly in light of P1 s repeated characterization of Defendant as a "billionaire." + +Based upo a fo oing, it is hereby + +### ORD D ADJUDGED that + +&#x27;Fraudulent transfer claims under Florida law arise under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act ("FUFTA"), Fla. Stat. § 726.101, et seq.. FUFTA, as set forth in Florida Statute § 726.105, provides the substantive requirements that must be pled to state a valid fraudulent transfer claim. Nationsbank. N.A. v. Coastal Utilities. Inc., 814 So.2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2002). The plaintiff must show that "(1) there was a creditor to be defrauded; (2) a debtor intending fraud; and (3) a conveyance of property which could have been applicable to the payment of the debt due." Id. + +(1) Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for leave to Provide Recently-obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit (DE 386 in 08-80119) is **GRANTED**. + +(2) Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165 in 08-80119) is **DENIED**. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 5th day of November, 2009. + +![]()Copies to: +all counsel of record \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c307898f4dbb3a97c821a46ccbf9c9f452ee0c68 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168/EFTA02761168.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,816 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761168.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 18514, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY N'S OBJECTION TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADL ARDS' REQUEST FOR \nAN0.203 \nJUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT DA STATUTES \nSECTIONS 90.202k", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 527.5859985351562, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 527.5859985351562, + 376.60302734375 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 376.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 356.96490478515625, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 356.96490478515625, + 486.863037109375 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 486.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECORD FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 406.068603515625, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 406.068603515625, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "M EMORAND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sections 90.401 and 90.403 Florida Statut A\\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 343.8000183105469, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 343.8000183105469, + 362.7999572753906 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 362.7999572753906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sections 90.404 and 90.405, Florida Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 332.4248352050781, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 332.4248352050781, + 224.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 224.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Secti 609 and 90.610. Florida Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 332.6551818847656, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 332.6551818847656, + 556.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 556.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sections 90.202 aid c 9 4203. Florida Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 332.4300842285156, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 332.4300842285156, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.8493347167969, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.8493347167969, + 197.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 197.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 72.64501953125 + ], + [ + 402.69390869140625, + 72.64501953125 + ], + [ + 402.69390869140625, + 100.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 100.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.908, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 329.868, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 329.868, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 280.908, + 396.90000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORD D ADJUDGED that", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 290.359375, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 290.359375, + 554.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 554.7324981689453 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761168" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc7c95ab2fc94dc2c86487756aee61d1af6400c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## THE PARTIES' NOTICE OF PENDI TIONS TO BE HEARD AT SPECIAL SF 1 NGS + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epst t in"), and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. P e parties' agreement and in response to this Court's November 14, 2017, Orde ran Epstein's Motion for Continuance of Trial, hereby provide the Court with the o ist of pending Motions to be heard at the special set hearings on November 29, 201 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.), December 5, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.) and December 7, 20 0:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m.): + +| Sequence | Motion | Time for Motion 1 | Time for Response | +|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------| +| | Issue No. 1 to be determined: Evidentiary implications of Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege. There are multiple motions that raise a number of issues that this Court must resolve. The parties agree that the Fifth Amendment related motions should be determined first by the Court. See Items 1-3 below. | | | + +I Movant will reserve rebuttal time from the total amount allotted for the Motion. + +| Sequence | Motion | Time for Motion 1 | Time for Response | +|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------| +| 1 2 | 11/17/17 Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine 3
  • 9/28/17, [REDACTED] Response
  • [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Revised Motion is Outstanding
| 1.5 hours | 1.5 hours | +| 2 | 9/25/17, [REDACTED] Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017, Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to Exclude Evidence as to Which Discovery was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege 4
  • 10/13/17, Epstein's Response
  • 10/20/17, [REDACTED] Reply
| 1.5 hours | 1.5 hours | +| 3 | 11/13/17, [REDACTED] Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence
  • Epstein's Response Outstanding
| 1.5 hours | 1.5 hours | +| 4 | 10/4/17, Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings
  • 10/10/17, [REDACTED] Response
  • 10/17/17, [REDACTED] Supplemental Response
| 20 minutes | 20 minutes | +| 5 | 11/3/17, Epstein's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Fourth Amended Counterclaim
  • [REDACTED] Response Outstanding
| 20 minutes | 20 minutes | +| 6 | 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery
  • 11/15/17, Edwards' Response
This Motion Supplements:
  • 9/25/17, Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from [REDACTED]
  • 9/28/17, Edwards' Memorandum in Opposition
  • 9/25/17, Epstein's Motion to Strike [REDACTED] Discovery Objections and to Compel Responses
  • 9/28/17, [REDACTED] Response
| 2.5 hours | 2.5 hours | +| 7 | 10/26/17, [REDACTED] Motion for Protective Order (Courtney [REDACTED])
  • Epstein's Response Outstanding
| 20 minutes | 20 minutes | + +2 Motions listed as 1 and 2 overlap the issue of the Fifth Amendment which both parties agree necessarily should be addressed at the outset. + +3 Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine amends his Omnibus Motion in Limine filed on September 25, 2017. + +Epstein believes the Motion to Strike the Affidavit was deemed moot at the October 3, 2017, hearing on Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment and only the Fifth Amendment issues remain outstanding. + +| Sequence | Motion | Time for Motion 1 | Time for Response | +|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------| +| 8 | 9/21/17, ██████ (four) Motions to Compel Substantive Responses to Discovery
• Epstein's Responses Outstanding | 1.5 hours | 1.5 hours | +| 9 | 11/8/17, ██████ Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203
• 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection | 20 minutes | 20 minutes | +| 10 | 10/5/17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against ██████ and his Counsel
• 11/8/17, ██████ Response | 45 minutes | 45 minutes | + +DATED: November 17, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +By:/s/Jack Scarola. with permission + +Jack Scarola (FBN 169440) mep®searcylaw.com jsx@sea m scarolat cylaw.com Co-Cou efendant/C Plainti J Edwa + +LINK & ROCKENB 1555 Palm B West Palm B (561) 727 A oulevard, Suite 301 33401 ) 727-3601 [fax] + +off J. Link + +t J. Link (FBN 602991) Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Aneela(4linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: TinalalinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Troyalinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanva(Minkrocklaw.com Secondary: EservicealinIcrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for PlaintiffrCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax], + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link tat isS" Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) ,xy Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrockl m Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Anaela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Trovalinkrocklaw.com Secondary:Alphya(glinkrocklaw.com S arN,Eserviee@linkrocklaw.com ounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant pstein + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes.Bouleva West Palm Beach, FL 33409". menasearcvlaw.c | & ipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| jsx@searcylaw. m | njs@FLAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolatcam@searcylaw.com | kbt@FLAnpellateLaw.com | +| Co-Coun | I or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff | +| Brad, J. aids | | +| | Co-Counselor iendant/Counter-Plaint iff I | +| J. wards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@eplIc.com | Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com | +| staff.efileAnathotoiustice.com Co-Counselor De J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2df6f1ab544fc3a904549bedc2528d60d31ec42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181/EFTA02761181.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761181.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 14076, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 62.852 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 62.852 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 105.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 105.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PARTIES' NOTICE OF PENDI TIONS \nTO BE HEARD AT SPECIAL SF 1 NGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 310.952 + ], + [ + 446.58770751953125, + 310.952 + ], + [ + 446.58770751953125, + 340.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 340.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 77.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 77.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 432.54 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761181" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac533117ec2911f56e2bbb9074c9362c6abc196d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.md @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +### SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE + +Pursuant to Florida Statute §90.404 BraS;yS A I , by and through his undersigned counsel, files this Supplement to his 3, 2017 Motion in Limine to address the scope of admissible evidence in the if nding malicious prosecution claim, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +# Summary + +In additi6n and in furtherance of the reasons set forth in the Motion in Limine Addressing k" ope of Admissible Evidence, the following allegations from Epstein's Initial Complai filed on December 7, 2009 and questions and answers from Epstein's deposition taken on March 17, 2010 support a request that the Court grant the Motion in Limine and confirm that evidence of Epstein's extensive pattern of victimization of minor females is admissible in this malicious prosecution case based upon the filing of the Initial Complaint on December 7, 2009. + +### A. Epstein's Initial Complaint Alleged that the L.M., E.W, and Jane Doe cases were "Manufactured" for the "Sole Purpose" of Funding Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme + +In his Initial Complaint filed on December 7, 2009 against Mr. Epstein made the following allegations: + +1 49: " . . . rather than evaluating and resolving the [three victim] the merits (i.e. facts) which included knowledgeable, voluntary a sensual actions bierA of the claimants' . . . RRA and the Litigati which included as defined] sought through protective ord ections to block relevant discovery regarding their claimants." + +". . . In order to continue to bring in monies other co-conspirators used the Civil Actions [de being pursued by Brad , along wit a means of obtaining massive amounts of m estors, Rothstein and e three victim cases ufactured lawsuits, as + +Epstein therefore alleged that any sex k and Jane Doe were consensual and that ere s no valid basis for the lawsuits being pursued on those victim's behalf ra y Epstein specifically alleged that those victims' claims were p own number of "manufactured lawsuits" being pursued against Epstein. Initial Complaint further stated that Mr. pursued his clients' "manufa ,wi red" v c ims for the "sole purpose" of funding Rothstein's Ponzi scheme: ions between he and L.M., E.W., + +;By using the Civil Actions against Epstein as `bait' and fabricating ents regarding same, Rothstein and others were able to lure investors into Ro lair and bilked [sic] them of millions of dollars which, in turn, was used to fund the litigation against Epstein for the sole purpose of continuing the massive Ponzi scheme." + +I Unless otherwise stated, all emphasis is supplied. + +Epstein, all of which "manufactured acts were the "sole The following questions swers took place at the March 17, 2010 deposition of Jeffrey ? lital5nsistent with Epstein's underlying claim that Mr. on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, despite the fact that any sexual ese victims and Epstein were "knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual," for se" of furthering Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAC Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +There can therefore be no question that, as it relates to probable cause and malice, one of the key issues in this malicious prosecution claim is whether Epstein had a good-faith belief that the LM, EW, and Jane Doe claims were "manufactured" for the "sole purpose" of funding a Ponzi scheme. In support of this spurious claim, Epstein alleged that any sexual contact ese minor children was "knowledgeable, voluntary, and consensual." Mr. urden of proof to establish that Epstein lacked probable cause for these allegations, pstein had in fact molested and abused these children over the course of years. and is certainly entitled to, demonstrate to the members asserted by these victims against Jeffrey Epstein, w S 'I " that Epstein had actual malice when he brought , which was nothing more than an attempt to intimidate his victims and their attom has every intention to, the truth of the claims being provide circumstantial evidence + +A B. Epstein Confirmed in His D iit That Mr. "Ginned Up" and "Crafted" the aims Made By His Clients" + +Deco. Tr. Page 13. lines 8-21 (alleging that victim L.M. was part of a conspiracy to create "fraudulent" and "fabricated" cases): + +Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +> A: L.M. is part of a conspiracy with Scott Rothstein, creating —excuse me — creating fraudulent cases of a sexually charged nature in which the U.S.bAt yte has already charged the firm of Rothstein, a firm of which is a partner, was a partner, with creating, fabricating malicious cases of a sexual nature, including cases with respect to me, specifically, in order to fleece unsuspecting investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars. + +Dep. Tr. page 25. lines 6-25 (alleging that Mr. clients' claims we multi-million dollar damages that were being alleged): A'? ,rth the + +Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt to, q these allegations and engaged in what you contend be proceedings, what else did Mr. personally, lawsuit? n up, unquote, vant discovery nns the basis for this + +A. Mr. , personally, engag lu artners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail cell, potentially fo f his life, he shared information, what I've been told and -- excuse m e read in the newspapers, 13 boxes of information that had my name on with other attorneys at his firm. He counseled his clients to illintain positions alleging multi-million dollar damages in order for them o scam local investors out of millions of dollars. He and his — many of his other partners already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney havetbeen accused by the U.S. Attorney of running a criminal enterprise. + +De •. Tr. 30 lines 6- leging that Mr. IIME clients' claims were "false"): + +Q.: Wha ese other people tell you Mr. did with respect to going to other to 9 + +E: Form. + +A: Mr. went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medias and making statements to local press regarding false claims made by his clients in order that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, could defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +Dep. Tr. Page 12. lines 12-21 (stating that "gin up these allegations" means to "craft" allegations, which included those brought by victim L.M.): + +Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +A: It means craft allegations of multi-million dollar cases; in fact L.M.'s case dame es of \$50-million, settlements in order for Sco Mein and the rest of Mr. partners to fleece unsuspecting investo ou f illions and millions of dollars based on cases that didn't exist or allele d that I had settled. + +Epstein also repeatedly asserted his 5th Amendment :e with regards to questions related to certain questions regarding his sexual mot f L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. 7 Obviously, the fact that Epstein never intended •• ot5th Ns Amendment privilege when he brought this underlying claim is relevant atidGiate to whether Epstein had probable cause to initiate this proceeding in the first pla + +C Epstein's Initial Comp ed LM, EW, and Jane Doe's Cases "Were Weak and Had Minimal Value + +Along with allegi yt the three specific victim cases were "manufactured" for the "sole purpose" of fiindip (Sa Po ,rheme, sc Epstein's Initial Complaint repeatedly states that these cases had no real v + +othstein and the Litigation Team knew or should have known that heir three (3) filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following reasons..." + +111: "Defendant, L.M., . . . was an essential participant in the scheme referenced infra by, among other things substantially changing prior sworn testimony, so as to assist the Defendants in promoting their fraudulent scheme for the promise of a multi-million dollar recovery relative to the Civil Actions . . . involving Epstein, which was completely out of proportion to her alleged damages." + +> Ell: "Rothstein, with the intent and improper motive to magnify his financial gain so [sic continue to fund the fraudulent and illegal investment and/or Ponzi scheme, had demand excessive money from Epstein in the Civil Actions." + +> 46: ".. . However, the actual facts behind [L.M.'s] action would never support such extraordinary damages." + +> 1151:- . .. Plaintiff Epstein has incurred and continues to incur mone tig ama including, but not limited to, having to pay an amount in aces o e Civil Actions' true value..." + +Whether the cases brought by victims L.M., E.W., and Jane re valid claims with real value therefore goes directly to both the probable cause ce elements of Mr. malicious prosecution claim. Did Epstein have probable ege that the claims were "weak and had minimal value," and that L.M.'s claim i cu was supported by facts that "would never support such extraordinary damages"9 in , pstein's allegation in paragraph 49 is true and the contact with those children w geable, consensual, and voluntary," then the jury may conclude that Epstein h C j e cause to allege that those claims were instead "manufactured" for the "sole p ' of furthering Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. But when the jury learns that Epstein really lest these young girls (for which he paid \$5.5 million in settlement monies), and tha upon their age it was legally impossible to consent to Epstein's sexual molestatio ry will determine that not only did Epstein lack probable cause for his allegatio but he had actual malice at the time the allegations were made. That evidence further supports the conclusion that the true purpose was to intimidate Epstein's numerous victims and their attorneys, specifically Mr. MI, from continuing to prosecute victim claims, or to + +compromise claims below their true value. Those factual issues that Epstein's Initial Complaint put directly in contention should be, and will be, decided by the jury2. + +## D. Although Epstein Conceded that He Paid L.M. for Some Form ofSex, the ' 1 Complaint Also Alleged that L.M. Was a Liar + +Although Epstein concedes in paragraph 46(a) that he was "one o 's any 'Johns'," he nonetheless insists that Mr. "manufactured" L.M.'s cl fo the "sole purpose" of furthering Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. In furtherance of these ons, Epstein attacked L.M.'s credibility in detail throughout the Initial Complaint. , Epstein claimed that L.M.'s case was "weak and had minimal value" because i of have any type of sex with Epstein (see I 42(h)(i)), she did not perform oral n em (see I 42(j)), and that Epstein did not coerce, induce or entice L.M. to corn s of sexual misconduct. (see I 47(b)). Because L.M.'s claim was false, Epstein th 'the actual facts behind her action would never support such extraordinary damages" ( 6), and instead L.M.'s claim was manufactured to further Rothstein's Ponzi schemeIcelabf 7). + +Certain er Epstein had in fact abused and molested L.M. is therefore clearly relevant t ble cause and malice. + +# E. E ein's Initial complaint Alleged that the Broad Range of Discovery Engaged in By Mr. Was Performed Solely to Further Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme + +2maintains that at the close of the evidence the material undisputed facts will require the Court to direct a verdict in favor of on the issue of probable cause. That is,tes lack of probable cause to support his claims against will be determined as a matter of law in a' favor, particularly given the preclusive effect of Epstein's Fifth Amendment assertions. + +Epstein also alleged that the broad range of the discovery conducted by into matters with no direct tie to clients supports a reasonable suspicion that was fabricating claims to support the Ponzi scheme. Specifically, Epstein alleges that Mr. pursued "a civil litigation strategy that was unrelated to the trt or value of [his] clients' claims." (1 Summary of Action). In support thereof, Epstei ec l c aiLnged virtually every litigation decision that Mr. made in pursuing the clai y L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, including for example: + +1 31(e): "[Mr. I utilized the judicial proce unreasonable and unnecessary discovery, fo\ Ponzi scheme." g, but not limited to, urpose of furthering a + +1.3\_1: "[Mr. I relentlessly and pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein these famous individuals knowing full well that no underage wo nboard and no illicit activities took place." + +1 41: "The sole purpos profile friends/acquain to investors." heduling of these depositions or listing high tential witnesses was, again, to `pump' the cases + +1 42(a)-(I): Challe i l!" n a litany of litigation decisions made by Mr. as being mad ely ' \*]n furtherance of the[] fraudulent scheme against Epstein." + +1 44: actions described in paragraph 42 above herein had no legitimate p i ursuing the Civil Actions against Epstein, but rather were meant to e fraudulent scheme and criminal activity of Rothstein so that he and o rs could fraudulently overvalue the settlement value of existing and nonex' ent claims against Epstein to potential investors." + +". ... actions constitute fraud upon Epstein as . . . the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good faith and with the best interests of their clients in mind at all times when in reality, they were acting in furtherance of the investment of Ponzi scheme described herein" + +victims other than the three clients represents k \ s These allegations were made in support of the theme of Epstein's Initial Complaint: that had "manufactured" his clients' claims for the "sole purpose" of furthering Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Whether Epstein knew, at the time he made them, that the allegations listed above were in fact false therefore goes directly to the elements of probable cause and and Mr. is entitled to establish to the members of the jury that Epstein ese allegations were false at the time he made them because (1) underage females ally assaulted on Epstein's airplane; (2) some of Epstein's high-profile friends/a ai es were onboard when those assaults occurred; (3) because pursuant to Florida .404(2) and Federal Rule of Evidence 415(G), evidence of other acts of sexual a ild molestation by Epstein against was clearly admissible and the discovery into such other criminal uct entirely proper; and (4) because L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe had punitive damage nding against Epstein, the full scope of his punitive conduct was properly subject t + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +# F. Epstein's Initial aint Alleged Thata Had Not Molested Numerous Children, and That He amaged By Mr. Truthful Assertions to the Contrary + +One of i A tions in paragraph 42 that Epstein alleged had "no legitimate purpose in pursuing ctions against Epstein, but rather [was] meant to further the [Ponzi scheme]," was the wing statement made by Mr. to a Federal Court on July 21, 2009: + +What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as ow investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. We're not talking about give, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which, I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children ... and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working + +> underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls. + +(142(e)). Epstein then alleges, in paragraphs 50, 51, and 52, that he has been damaged, in part, by Mr. M' contention that Epstein is a serial and unrepentant child molester. + +It is therefore beyond dispute that, in prosecuting his malicious pro ion aim, Mr. has the burden of proof to establish that Epstein did not have a • asis to allege that he was damaged by Mr. proclamation to the Federal court Qalong with the host of other spurious and malicious allegations contained in the Complaint). Why? Because Epstein really did molest all those young, innocent chi us crimes that he has callously compared to "stealing a bagel." + +For the foregoing reasotj.E acs respectfully requests that the Court grant his Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of ssible Evidence. \?\* + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1st day of NOV., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b62292771c296c748ad7e161fa882a6bdc5b15fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186/EFTA02761186.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,612 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761186.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 18728, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 116.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING \nSCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 349.82099999999997 + ], + [ + 461.9320068359375, + 349.82099999999997 + ], + [ + 461.9320068359375, + 378.863037109375 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 378.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 501.162 + ], + [ + 335.47491455078125, + 501.162 + ], + [ + 335.47491455078125, + 516.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 516.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Initial Complaint Alleged that the L.M., E.W, and Jane Doe cases were \n\"Manufactured\" for the \"Sole Purpose\" of Funding Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 525.6420288085938, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 525.6420288085938, + 152.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 152.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Although Epstein Conceded that He Paid L.M. for Some Form ofSex, the ' 1 \nComplaint Also Alleged that L.M. Was a Liar", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 500.4674987792969, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 500.4674987792969, + 233.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 233.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. E ein's Initial complaint Alleged that the Broad Range of Discovery Engaged in By Mr. \nWas Performed Solely to Further Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 542.0299072265625, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 542.0299072265625, + 606.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 606.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Epstein's Initial aint Alleged Thata Had Not Molested Numerous Children, \nand That He amaged By Mr. Truthful Assertions to the Contrary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 539.561279296875, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 539.561279296875, + 510.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 510.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 426.06000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761186" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9deaf2350763b67dcef90ea3abf67ae9b49ea1e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.md @@ -0,0 +1,996 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +# PART 7 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motiop4 : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +**APP. 26** + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXXMB AG +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, +-vs- VOLUME I OF II, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M. individually, +Defendants. + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRADLEY J. BOWARDS, ESQUIRE + +(Tuesday, March 23, 20010 +10:00 - 5:07 p.m. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes, Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Reported By: +Cynthia [REDACTED], RPR, FPR +Notary Public, State of Florida +Prose Court Reporting +Job No.: 1333 + +APPEARANCES: + +On behalf of the Plaintiff: +ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Phone: 561.842.2820 + +and +JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1409 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5012 +Phone: 561.659.8300 + +and +On behalf of the Plaintiff: +ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, ESQUIRE +HARVARD LAW SCHOOL +Hauser 520 +Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 +Phone: 617.496.2020 + +On behalf of the Defendant: +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: 561.686.6300 + +ALSO PRESENT: +Jeffrey Epstein +[REDACTED] Kozak, Videographer +Prose Reporting Services + +INDEX + +EXAMINATION DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], ESQUIRE +BY MR. CRITTON 5 + +B X H I B I T S + +EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE +PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 211 +CRIMINAL COMPLAINT +PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 COMPLAINT 239 +PLAINTIFF'S EX. 3 JULY 22, 2009 276 +FACSMILE + +PROCEEDINGS + +Deposition taken before Cynthia [REDACTED], +Registered Professional Reporter and Florida +Professional Reporter, and Notary Public in and for +the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause. + +THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video +record. This is Media Number One in the +videotaped deposition of [REDACTED] in the +matter of Jeffrey Epstein versus Scott +Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], and L.M. + +Today is Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010 at +10:00 a.m. We're here in the law offices +of Searcy, Denney, Scarola; Barnhart & +Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, +West Palm Beach, Florida. + +My name is Joe Kozak. I am the +videographer. The court reporter is Cindy +[REDACTED] from Prose, Prose Court Reporting +Agency. + +Will counsel please introduce +yourselves, and then the court reporter +will swear in the witnesses. + +MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of the + +1 A. I don't know that that's a correct statement 2 Q. You don't know one way or the other? 3 A. The law firm was constantly expanding and 4 constantly under constriction. For the most part in the 5 beginning the cases were kept in a, in a filing cabinet 6 in my office and later were kept in a filing cabinet, I 7 believe, in a locked storage location in another area of 8 the office. 9 Q. And did any attorney have access to that 3.0 storage area or do you know? 11 A. I believe any attorney could have had access. 12 Q. And if the attorney could have access, you 13 wouldn't necessarily know about it, true? 14 A. Correct. 15 Q. In the trustee's filing that they made in 16 response to my motion to preserve evidence, they 17 indicated that 13 boxes relating to Jeffrey Epstein 18 had been removed by the FBI or the government when 19 they came into the RRA offices. Do you remember 20 seeing that pleading? 21 A. No. 22 Q. Okay. Are you, were there, in fact, 13 23 boxes of material or at least 13 banker's boxes of 24 material that related to matters directed to, 25 whether, whatever the content related to Mr. Epstein + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 • 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23. 22 23 24 25 did they also have swipe cards so that they could access different areas in the firm? A. I believe so. Q. With regard to when you joined RRA, did you ever have any further meetings with Mr. Rothstein; that is, from the day you started at RRA, did you ever meet Mr. Rothstein again? A. By meet him again — Q. Did you ever have a meeting with him again regarding your position in the firm? A. No. Q. Okay. Did you ever mealy/jih him and a number of other individuals with mgafda to firm 1 business? A. No. Q. Finn cases? A. I don't believe so. Q. Was Mr. Rothstein over present in any meeting where any of your cases were discussed? Let me strike that- Was Mr. Rothstein ever present wherein at any meeting where any of the cases against Jeffrey Epstein were discussed? Don't tell me cement; just was he ever present. A. How would I know that? I don't know. He could, he could be in a meeting right now where the case + +1 that you were aware of; that is, hard copies? 2 A. I don't know. 3 Q. Okay. Could have been more, could bays 4 been less; you just don't know? \_ \_ 5 A. Correct. 6 Q. If I understood your testimony, 7 Mr. Rothstein, Mr. Rosenfejcit, any other attorney or 8 investigator could have accosted those files 9 depending or where they were within the firm, true? to A. I am not sum exactly who could have accessed 11 it. You asked me if the attorneys could and the 12 attorneys had swipecar& for various locked areas. 13 Each attorney I believe had access to any area where 14 those files werelocated. I believe so. 15 Q. Qkay. Well, during the time you were 16 there did an individual by the name of Ken Jenne 17 work there? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. Okay. Did an individual by the name of 20 Mike Fisten work for the firrn -- 21. A. Ycs. 22 Q. -- for RRA? Were they employees of the 23 firm or were they independent contractors? 24 A. I don't know. 25 Q. Okay. During the time they were there, + +1 could be discussed for all! know. 2 Q. I'm sorry. Obviously, where you, where 3 you were present. Where you ever present at a 4 meeting where Mr. Rothstein was also present where 5 the Epstein cases were discussed? 6 A. No. 7 Q. (Did lfe sie7r call you to communicate witli 8 (yot illyou either by phone, video conference, in 9 any fashion to discuss any act aspect of the cases 10 Otan inihridiuraiisfreffro—y-EpTfelit? 11 MR. SCAROLA: You can answer that. 12 (THE-WITNESS: He has cornmuniatalTiEflu 13 (various, about legal issues related to the 14 (as T,iell as commented about the case to me on 15 aN ry few occasions but I wouldWleilifiiii 16 (three times 17 BY MR. CRM'ON: 18 Q. During the time that you, from April of 3.9 '09 through late October of '09, correct? 20 A. In that time period, where, is that when 21 these - 22 Q. Correct. 23 A. — things happened? 24 Q. Well, that's the time you were there; 25 that's what I am asking. + +1 A. When I was there. + 2 Q. And do you, can you remember the date, any + 3 specific date that you spoke with him? + 4 A. No. + 5 Q. Do you remember any specific month that + 6 you would have had one of the -- well, what did you + 7 say something less than five conversations? I don't + 8 want to misquote you. + 9 A. I said less than three conversations. + 10 Q. All right. So, something less than three + 11 conversations you had with Mr. Rothstein regarding + 12 Epstein cases, either legal issue or a comment, some + 13 comment about the case to you, correct? + 14 A. Yes. + 15 Q. All right. The first time that he ever + 16 spoke to you, did he call you or did you call him? + 17 A. I, I never called Scott Rothstein about + 18 anything. █, take that back. About anything related + 19 to Jeffrey Epstein. + 20 Q. The first conversation that you can recall + 21 where either a legal issue or a comment was made + 22 about Jeffrey Epstein by Mr. Rothstein to you, he + 23 obviously initiated the call? + 24 A. It wasn't a call. + 25 Q. What was it? + +1 A. A comment in passing. And I believe I was + 2 sitting at a table in BOVA when he walked over to my + 3 table and commented about Jeffrey Epstein. + 4 Q. Okay. Who were you there with at the + 5 time? + 6 A. I don't remember. + 7 Q. Were you with some friends? Were you with + 8 other lawyers? + 9 A. All right. I am jogging my memory. I, I have + 10 no idea. + 11 Q. What did he say? + 12 MR. SCAROLA: To the extent that you can + 13 answer that question without disclosing any + 14 mental impressions with regard to the lawsuit + 15 or any attorney-client privileged + 16 communications, you can answer. + 17 To the extent that it might invade + 18 either the work-product or attorney-client + 19 privilege, you should not respond. + 20 THE WITNESS: Can I talk to you? + 21 MR. SCAROLA: Sure. + 22 (A brief recess was held.) + 23 MR. SCAROLA: Are we on? + 24 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Yeah. + 25 MR. SCAROLA: The record should reflect + +1 that we have had an opportunity to consult and + 2 I have advised Mr. █ that there is no + 3 privilege protection for the particular + 4 communications involved. + 5 BY MR. CRITTON: + 6 Q. What did he say? + 7 A. He commented to me, I want you to get that + 8 pedophile. + 9 Q. And your response was what? + 10 A. I didn't respond. + 11 Q. All right. Second conversation that you + 12 can remember, where were you? + 13 A. I had just come out of the conference room on + 14 the main floor after taking a deposition in another + 15 case. And he walked by and said, did you get that Fing + 16 pedophile yet. + 17 Q. And your response? + 18 A. Again. + 19 Q. No response. + 20 A. Didn't respond. + 21 Q. On the first occasion when he came over + 22 and if I understand correctly, all he said was the + 23 comment that you referenced and then he left. You + 24 didn't respond and then he just made the comment and + 25 then left? + +1 A. Right. He was walking by in his normal, loud, + 2 ostentatious kind of way, greeting everybody in the + 3 restaurant. Came over to my table and he feels, at + 4 least my impression was obliged to say something to + 5 everyone. And that's the comment he said to me. + 6 And if you've ever seen him, he is + 7 basically always just skipping around and he hoped + 8 on over somewhere else. So, yes, it was in, + 9 literally in passing. + 10 Q. Okay. How, how, how did he even know you + 11 had cases involving Mr. Epstein? + 12 A. I don't know. + 13 Q. Because I think you testified earlier that + 14 you had never discussed an Epstein case with + 15 Mr. Rothstein one-on-one, correct? + 16 A. Absolutely, true. + 17 Q. You never discussed an Epstein case or + 18 either of your three clients with Mr. Rothstein even + 19 with a group of people around, correct? + 20 A. Correct. + 21 Q. (All right) (Do you remember a third + 22 occasion that he spoke to you regarding Epstein + 23 related occasion, cases?) + 24 A. (Anything else that he ever spoke with me about + 25 related to Epstein related issues is attorney-client and + +1 work-prodirainqlegerfififon—ifalron thifl 2 (to divulge. + +3 Q. Okay. I am not — I need to still ask the 4 last question though. I thought you said earlier is 5 that you never had any substantive oonversations, 6 maybe I misunderstood, with Mr. Rothstein about the 7 Epstein cases. Did I misunderstand you? 8 A. I don't believe that that was — I had 9 conversations at a point about legal issues related to 10 Jeffrey Epstein and that's, that's it. + +11 Q. Was that a one conversation? Was that a number of conversations that you had where legal issues were discussed as to, separate and apart from the two comments he made about the case to you which you were, you waived any privilege, work-product or attorney-client privilege? A. I, I can't tell you. If you and I this 18 morning had a conversation and then we took a bathroom 19 break, and we had the same continuing conversation, I don't lmow if that's one conversation or two. But I can tell you the, the only time I remember Scott Rothstein participating in any way, shape, or form in any conversation related to anything substantive dealing with, and not dealing with any specific client but a legal issue, was on a particular one-day event, one-day + +1 A. Scott Rothstein's office. 2 Q. Had you been called up to meet with 3 Mr. Rothstein? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Okay. And who contacted you and told you 6 that Mr. Rothstein wanted to see you? 7 A. His, his secretary or paralegal or something. 8 Q. And did you get a call saying Mr. 9 Rothstein would like to sec you right now, or was it 10 something that was scheduled? 11 A. It was not scheduled. 12 Q. So, you got a call and somebody told you, 13 come up, Scott, Scott wants to see you. 14 A. I don't remember exactly what was used, but it 3.5 was1 believe, Russell istliscussing a legal issue with 16 Scott Rothstein; cot\* to his office. 17 Q. Okay. Wet the legal issue, did it involve 18 one of the Epstein cases or the Epstein cases? 19 A. It, it was 8 legal issue related to -- yes. 20 Q.: Okay, How long, how much time did you 21 spend well, let me strike that. So, when you 22 %maim to Mr. Rothstein's office, it's --I 23 understand you had to go through some security to 2 W: O A. You've seen the video? + +Page 1 1 conversation, if you want to call it. 2 Q. And that's at what time? At that time 3 legal issues were discussed? 4 MR. SCAROLA: Legal issue wa testimony, a particular legal issu 6 MR. CRITTON: Correct. A feral issue. 7 BY MR. CRITTON: B Q. When did that occur, I this one-day 9 discussion or a day discussio regarding a 10 specific legal issueV., 11 A. I don't latow. \ 12 Q. Was he present, fie Mr. Rothstein and you 13 present at thrilame elm.? 14 A. Ycs. - 15 Q. Okay: Was anyone else there with you? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. Who else was present? 1B A. Russ Adler, someone was on the telephone. I'm 19 not remembering who that was. I can't remember. I will 20 tell you if I do remember. 21 Q. Was Bill Berger there? 22 A. No. 23 Q. And, you don't. So, there was you. Well, 24 let me strike that. Where did the conversation take 25 place? + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. I actually haven't. A. 01), really. Okay. Yeah, it's — Q. In order to get into Mr. Rothstein's — A. It's like a compound. Q. Kind of concern you that this guy running the firm had a compound? A. I -- at the time, no. In retrospect, okay, now that we all know how this whole thing unfolded, but at the time, no. Q. Had you ever worlosd in an office? And you had worked at some big offices. You worked at the State Attorney's office in Broward County? A. True. Q. You worked for, I think for Kubicki Draper? A. Correct. Q. Did Mr. Kubicki, Gene Kubicki ever have a compound around his office that you had to go through any typo of security either people and/or locked doors or secured doors in order to access him? A. No. Q. Had yoq ever worked other than the Broward County Sheriffs, at the Broward County State Attorney's Office with, and with Kublcki Draper, had + +1 you ever worked for a large firm? + 2 A. No. You just named all the places I have + 3 worked. + 4 Q. All right. Is this the first time then + 5 that you had been to Mr. Rothstein's office that he + 6 called you up there? + 7 A. No. + 8 Q. You had been in his office before? + 9 A. One time. + 10 Q. And what was that occasion? + 11 A. I was having back surgery, and I went there to + 12 tell him I am having back surgery. As you know I had + 13 back surgery, and I was telling him I don't know how + 14 long I'm going to be off because, you know, the recovery + 15 time is different for everybody. + 16 Q. Is that the only thing you talked about, + 17 the back surgery? + 18 A. That's the only thing we talked about. + 19 Q. Did the meeting you had with Scott, when + 20 you went up, when you were called up to his office + 21 that day, did that occur before your back surgery + 22 episode or meeting or after? + 23 A. After. + 24 Q. So, you would, you had back surgery. I + 25 think you were out two or three weeks and then you + +1 Q. How many security, different security + 2 levels did you have to go through in order to get, + 3 to go have your meeting with Mr. Rothstein and + 4 Mr. Adler? + 5 A. Two. + 6 Q. And to your recollection you don't + 7 remember ever seeing a security person? + 8 A. Right. + 9 Q. Okay. Who was in the office? + 10 A. Well -- + 11 Q. I'm sorry. + 12 A. I do not remember seeing a security person + 13 manning the door or granting access to his office. I + 14 saw security people every day in the office of RRA + 15 Q. (All right. And when you got into the + 16 office, Mr. Rothstein was there? + 17 (A. Yes. + 18 Q. Mr. Adler? + 19 (A. Yes. + 20 Q. There was someone on the telephone who you + 21 don't recall? + 22 (A. Yes. + 23 Q. (O. [REDACTED]. Was there anyone else present? + 24 (A. Not that I remember. + 25 Q. Okay. Was, were there any investigators, + +1 returned to the office, and then that meeting would + 2 have occurred? + 3 (A. Yeah, that's correct. + 4 Q. When you, in order to get into the office + 5 just as you have described it as a bunker, how many, + 6 did you have to go through any security people to + 7 get into -- + 8 (MR. SCAROLA: No, I think the description + 9 was a compound; + 10 (MR. CRITTON: I will use compound. Are + 11 you more comfortable with compound or a bunker? + 12 (I have seen it described both ways. I haven't + 13 seen the video, but I have seen it described + 14 both ways.) + 15 (THE WITNESS: I will describe it for you.) + 16 (Well, first I will answer your question) + 17 (Security people, I don't know if there was ever + 18 a time where one would have to go through + 19 security people to get to his office. But on + 20 the day or two days that I have been in his + 21 office, I did not encounter any security + 22 personnel.) + 23 (BY MR. CRITTON:) + 24 Q. Did you have to be buzzed into the office? + 25 (A) (It was more complicated than that) + +1 was Mr. Jenne or Mr. Fisten present? + 2 (A. No.) + 3 Q. (So, it was, you, Rothstein, Adler, and + 4 someone on the phone; that's it? + 5 (A. From what I remember.) + 6 Q. (How long did the meeting last?) + 7 (A. I don't know how long the meeting lasted.) + 8 Q. (Five minutes or was it a substantially + 9 long meeting?) + 10 (A) (Do you want how long I was in the meeting, I + 11 can give you an answer. How long the meeting lasted, I + 12 have no idea.) + 13 Q. (How long did the meeting last while you + 14 were present?) + 15 (A. Less than five minutes.) + 16 Q. (Was the value of any of the three cases + 17 discussed at all?) + 18 (A) (No.) + 19 Q. (Did Mr. Rothstein, did Mr. Rothstein + 20 appear to be knowledgeable about your cases?) + 21 (A) (No.) + 22 Q. Mr. Adler, was Mr. Adler someone that you + 23 had discussed the cases with on a somewhat regular + 24 basis -- + 25 (MR. SCAROLA: Objection, compound.) + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23. 22 23 24 25 BY-MR. CRITTON:) \_not content. Was Mr. Adler someone that you had discussed these Epstein cases with.) prior• to that meeting?) Q. Was he familiar with the cases, generally? A. He attended Jeffrey Epstein's deposition, so he heard the questions asked and heard the Fifth Amendment invocation and so the adverse Inferences and was therefore informed — MR. CRITTON: Move to strike as nonresponsive. BY MR. CRITT0N: Q. My question is was he familiar generally with the subject matter of the litigation against Mr. Epstein? A. In that he read the newspaper articles about molesting a bunch of children, yes, he was familiar with the subject matter. Q. And he read did you provide him with copies of the pleadings in these cases when they came to RRA? A. No. Q. What was the topic? What was the legal issue that you discussed — well, let me strike + +1 issue. 2 If it was not an issue that was 3 identified in the course of the 4 proceedings to opposing counsel, I am going to object and instruct you not to 6 answer on the basis of the work-product 7 privilege. a THE WITNESS: Work-product privilege. 9 BY MR. CRITTON: 10 Q. Do you know an individual by the namo of 11 Fandry, F-a-n-d-r-y? 12 A. That name doesn't ringaball right now. 13 Q. Do you know him to be -- does that name 14 mean anything with regard to, as an investigator, 15 Fandry? 16 A. That's a male? 17 Q. Pardon? 18 A. That's it first name or a last name? 19 Q. Last name, Richard Fandry. 20 A. I bow an investigator named Rick that did 21 work, was contracted out by RRA to do investigative 22 work. I don't know his last name but 23 Q. Did, did Rick ever do any work on any of 24 the Epstein cases to your knowledge? 25 A. I believe so. + +1 that. Who raised the legal issue, did 2 Mr. Adler raise it or did Mr. Rothstein? 3 A. I don't know. 4 Q. Okay. Well, how did the, who started the, 5 if you were there I think you said foie minuteslwho 6 did the talking? 7 A. When I came in the, in the office, it was in 8 the middle of a discussion. 9 Q. Was a question posed to you? 10 A. The question was on the table at least from my 11 perspective coming into the room and was then directed 12 at me, what's the aliments this particular legal issue. 13 Q. And what wits the legal issue? 14 MIL SCAROLA: Lees talk forjust a 15 second. 16 THE VIDEOGRAPHER• Are we going off the 17 record? 18 MR. SCAROLA: Actually, we don't oven have 19 to go off the record. Stay right here. 20 If this was an issue that vies 21 identified during the course of the legal 22 proceedings to opposing counsel, then I am 23 going to allowyou to you identify the 24 issue without getting into any of the 25 substance of the discussion regarding that + +Q. Do you know what the name of his business 2 was? 3 A. NO. 4 Q. Is Rick still being employed at the 5 current time by your firm to do investigation? 6 A. No. 7 Q. Is Mr. -- I asked you earlier if you knew 8 Ken Jenne and Michael Fisten and you said yes and 9 you knew that they had an association with RRA; is 10 that correct? 11 A. Yeah, that's correct. 12 Q. And do you know whether they were 13 employees or whether they were independent 14 contractors? 15 A. You asked me that and I still have no idea. 16 Q. Did they have offices within RRA, 17 Mr. Jenne and Mr. Fisten? 18 A. They, Mr. Jenne definitely had an office 19 within RRA Mr. Platen was normally in the field and I 20 assume he had a place to go in RRA I don't know if you 21 call it an office. 22 Q. Did you ever go -- 23 A. That's it 24 Q. Did you ever go meet with him within RRA? 25 A. Yes. + +1 Q. You have testified that investigations 2 'were done during the time, on Mr., relating to 3 Mr. Epstein during the time that you were at RRA 4 A Right. Q. My question to you is, did you -- first of 6 all did you receive written reports in addition to 7 oral reports? 8 A. From the investigators? 9 Q. Yes, sir. 10 THE WITNESS: Answer? 11 MR. SCAROL.A: Yeah. 12 THE WITNESS: The reports were — yes, I 13 did. 14 BY MR. CItITTON: 15 Q. And were the reports provided by e-mail or 16 were they provided by, in the form of a memo that 17 would be sent from the investigator to you or both? 18 A. 1,1 do not remember there being any in the . 19 form of an e-mail. Does not mean that there was not. I 20 did communicate by e-mail with other members of the firm 21 and other members of the investigative team on all cases 22 as has been my practice all along practicing law. There 23 were memos, though, that were given to me that were not 24 e-mail form that were the standard memos that I would 25 incorporate into a witness memo file. + +1 Q. And again that would just be in your, 2 would that be in your electronic storage as well 3 in the hard copies? 4 A. The version I saw was the electron' 5 Q. So, that would be stored in the Fo 6 program? 7 A. That's correct. 8 Q. All right And again other inditicluals in 9 the firm, other lawyers in the flan might be able to 10 access that program, you just don't know? 11 A. Right. Well,\* program, obviously that's 12 the program that the firit used. Now, whether they could 13 access, if you could go ad foss cases that weren't cases 14 you worked oni I reallyjust don't know. 15 Q. As an example could Mr. Fisten, on the, on 16 the Portia's:oak he access your, your file on an 17 Epstein case? 18 A. I don't know. 19 Q. If someone accessed your file, accessed 20 your electronic file, would you necessarily know 21 that? 22 A. No. 23 Q. All right So — 24 A. I don't believe so. 25 Q. It wouldn't show up that Michael Fisten, + +3. and 'Musing just as an example, is that he came in 2 or Scott Rothstein came in and looked at a 3 particular file of yours, whether it related to 4 Mr, Epstein or not, you don't know? 5 A. I can't answer that question accurately. 6 Q. Okay. Did you ever send investigative 7 reports to other lawyers regarding Mr. Epstein; that 8 is, if you got an investigative report from 9 Mr. Fisten or Mr. Jenne or whomever, would you send 10 those on to certain lawyers on a regular basis? 13. MR. SCAROLA: You can answer that 12 question. 13 THE WITNESS: No. 14 ' BY MR. CRITTON: 15 Q. (Mgt-lawyers, otherthen yourself, M% ere 16 rnicol'Vd frithiEpileincaWirinTficertirr ou 17 u\_were associated with 18 (A. What do you mean by "were involved?" I guess 19 asp. 20 (15) (What, what lawyers actually worked on ta 21 (file? ilmoviMr. Berger worked on the Epstein 22 (cases, co4 23 aLn some °unlit! capacity, correct. 24 CQ) Okay: Mr. Adler I know attended 2 (Kir.gpstem's depo\*ipp, correct? + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CAT—Corct Q. Did, did any other lawyers other than Mr. Adler or Mr. Berger attend any depositions? A. Your memory is going to be as good as mine there. I'm thinking. Mark Epstein's deposition was attend by Adler. Q. He went with you to New York? A. No. He didn't go with me to New York. He attended the deposition, and I also attended the deposition. Q. Both in person? A. Right. Q. Was he there for another fde or did he meet you there to specifically attend Mark Epstein's deposition? A. Coincidence that he was in New York during the , time when his deposition was being taken. Q. Any other lawyer that you can recall being at a deposition other than Adler, Berger and yourself? A. Not right now. If you remind me, I, I may remember. I don't remember right now. Q. Did other lawyers in the firm at RRA perform services on the files; that is, and by that I mean did they, were they involved in drafting + +**APP. 27** + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +\_\_\_\_\_ +JEFFREY EBSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, + +Defendants. + +VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION CONT'D OF [REDACTED] + +VOLUME II OF II + +PAGES 110 - 250 + +(October 10th, 2013) + +10:00 A.M. - 2:30 P.M. + +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400 +Fort Lauderdale, FL + +Stenographically Reported By: +WENDY [REDACTED], RPR +Notary Public, State of Florida +Empire Legal Support, Inc. +Fort Lauderdale Office +Phone: (954)241-1010 + +EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. +(954) 241-1010 + +in which cases were handled while was a partner 2 at RRA. The one meeting that you had in Mr. Rothstein's 3 office with Adler and some persons unknown -- 4 5 direction at that time that certain discovery should be 6 done or tactics should be used with regard to 7 some unknown person on the phone, were you given any prosecuting the Epstein cases? as + +8 A No. + +9 Q (Okay) (At the meetings that - at the) + +20 (meetings that occurred with these ers,) + +11 (Berger,)(Adler I e present and) + +12 (Epstein was discussed,) scovery that --) + +13 (discovery and or invest' arding Mr) (Epstein) + +14 ever discussed? + +15 + +16 + +17 (that we were talking about,) + +18 + +19 (assume (based upon the -- + +20 saw in the e-mails today\_,) (that is exactly the) + +ose of the meeting) correct? + +22 (Exactly,,)(that was the purpose of the meeting) + +23 MR. INDYKE: Discovery I think was the purpose 24 of the question. + +25 MR. HADDAD: I'm sorry? + +**APP. 28** + +From: prisclin A. tlntm.nto Tot Scott Rothstein Ca Amy N. Howard; AdeRs Cabello Subject: Week's Appts Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009 5:28:14 PH + +Monday + +oti,s,\$) + +4 + +Tuesday + +4S' (3:30prnSeln Conference) + +(Brad Steven Jaffe and Ken Jenne) + +\Wednesday + +04 + +From: Bradley J. [REDACTED] +To: Princilla A. Nascimento +Subject: saxon +Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:48:00 AM. + +--- + +Ok, I have the keys with me to the other office. I went and tested them out last night. How soon can we get saxon over there to pick up the printer and move it? + +Also, (ls Scott free at some point this morning to chat about Epstein? + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Partner +Rothetelin Rosenfeldt Adler | Attorneys at Law +Las Olas City Centre +401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1850 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954) 522-3458 +(954) 522-8663 - facsimile +[bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com) + +From: Ken Jenne +To: Scott Rothstein +Cc: Priscilla A. Nascimento; Mike Fisten +Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:40:23 AM + +--- + +(Scott: The lawyers and Investigators working the Epstein matter are meeting on the 12th Floor at 2pm today to discuss where we are in the investigation. If you have a moment, I know that everyone would love for you to be there.) Ken + +Ken Jenne +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler +401 E Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Email: [kjenne@ma-law.com](mailto:kjenne@ma-law.com) +Work: 954-522-3458 +Fax: 954-527-8663 + +**APP. 29** + +ECO P'Y + +No. 502009CA0408001cc'MBAG + +(511). + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +00 East Broward Boulevard, + +S Thursday,(June 14, 2012 + +e'Ft. Lauderdale, Florida + +9:14 a.m. - 12:37 p.m. + +Of + +(SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +(Via Video Conference) + +Taken II behalf of the Trustee pursuant to a notice of taking deposition + +Q. Please do. + +2 A. The Ponzi scheme was running very low on 3 capital. My co-conspirators and I needed to find a 4 new feeder fund, new investment sources. We had a 5 couple of very large, significantly wealthy potential 6 investors out there. I was looking for something that 7 would have been very attractive. We had ,had a lot of 8 inquiry during the due diligence period with these 9 people that were doing due diligen n the putative 10 cases that we were selling. ' <::! h I thought about 11 the Epstein case, realizin a t was a substantial AnN ) ASS" 12 actual file in the offi ,Same up with the idea 13 that if I created a e confidential settlement 14 circling around -- based upon this actual case, they 15 would be able to ,increase the level of due diligence 16 that I was able to offer to my potential investors. + +17 Q. 18 ow did you know this was a substantial file in yonffice at that time? + +19 A. 20 office. Again, through the people I spoke to in the + +21 Q. Such as who? + +22 A. 23 Fistos. Again, same people, Adler, , Jaffe, + +1 (interaction -2, + +2 Sorry, Tonja, I didn't mean to speak over 3 you. + +4 (If you talk to the people in the fin (L9 + +5 (they are honest with you)(they'll tell you my) + +6 (interaction was far more significant with Russ Adler) + +7 (probably more so because he was a co-conspirator of + +8 (mine) (My interaction with Russ was far greater by + +9 (many) many percents over my interaction with Brad) and + +10 (then you go down the line) (rhadmore interaction + +11 with than I with Mr)(Fistos, more + +12 (interaction with Jaffe than.Ifainath Mr. + +13 (and so on) + +14 Q. Russ was the head of your tort group, right? + +15 A. Yes. + +16 Q. 17 that co So these cases fell under the tort group; is + +18 'Yes, it fell under the fell under Russ' + +19 pu iew ultimately, yes. + +20 Q• And Brad was a partner at your firm during 21 the time these cases were there, correct? + +22 A. I believe that was his title. He was either 23 partner or shareholder. I. don't think we had made him 24 a shareholder yet. + +1 correct? + +2 A. To the best of my recollection, no. + +3 Q. So you stated that you learned this case 4 was -- I don't want to misquote you and listen to a 5 long speaking objection, but what did you call this 6 case? + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Who wants the quot + +8 THE WITNESS: It was a substanZ.:2 case 9 with a what I. perceived to be a ig y collectible 10 pedophile as a defendant. 11 BY MS. HADDAD: /SI) + +12 Q. (Right) (How dicliAkhow at the time when ` 1 13 you these investors wanted to investigate and you 114 said you were going to create acfake settlement; how 115 (did you know that this case was the case that yoU 16 (could use? + +rom talking to all the people that I Cjilip -8 (75.D2Q. Adler (Jaffe, IIIIIID(RE) 111111'0(g 9 (the extent that "(poke to him about it) + +0 Q. (Did you speak with Mr) about the ( case? + +2 EIL• CI (don't have aCiparric recollection one way 3 (or the others (I(remember speaking to him at least U Obriefly the day or the day of or the day before the CS actual investor's due diligence was going on as to + +O + +U 4 A. I'm certain that I did. I don't remember 25 which grow s I belon ed to. I never got into the full + +1 (what was going on. (And I may have spoke to him, a a (know I(spoke to Russ (but I may have spoke to him as 0 (well within a couple of days just prior to this due: ED (diligence because I(was trying to at least get somei (information in my head that Ijcould use when.I(Wi4 @ (creating this story for the investors. + +7 Q. Scott, what's Q-task? + +8 A. Q-task is a web based softw e system that I 9 had invested \$7 million in. + +10 Q. And what was the pu • k this internet 11 system? + +12 A. To be able to co AlShin icate in a secure 13 fashion ,and in a unique: group fashion about specific 14 files. + +15 Q. So forgive me, we all know I'm not good with 16 the computer.' 4 1hat was something that would be useful 17 within w firm, why? + +18 Because it allowed you to create groups and 19 had both general and private chats, organize data in 20 a very unique fashion. That was, at least to our way 21 of thinking, would have been very, very helpful in the 2 law firm setting with multiple practice groups. + +3 Q. Did you belong to any groups on Q-task? + +U 24 0 (How did you know,)(you just said you knew + +1 A. I don't recall. + +2 Q. Did you check? + +3 A. I don't remember one way or the other. It 4 was insignificant to me. + +5 (5-.) (Well,)(then explain to me) (You testified) 6 earlier that what was important to the investors to) 7 (see is that there was a(real case,) + +8 1O ( (Yes.) + +9 0 What did you look at or show them -- what) 10 (did you look at,)(first of all,)(to see if it was,) in 11 (fact) real case? + +12 (knew it was a) real case. + +13 (How did you know?) + +14 15 (E) case. (Because 'my lawyers told me it was a) G (believed them.) real) + +16 0 (What lawyers told you that?) + +17 18 ai (already told you it was a mixture of Russ) 19 (mean,) G (knew it was a) real case. (M) We had all these 20 (boxes)(we had pggple really working on the file + +210 (How do you know)-- + +22 or they were pulling a hell of a 23 (me) (Not that I didn't deserve it but scam on + +1 (you know was working on the case?) + +2 (the only people that I(knew for certain were, 3 working on the case was Brad and Russ Adler 4 (was doing his supervisory schtici)(T7hatever that was 5 (But other than tfiTE) CI don't know which other lawyers 6 (were assisting Mr. CI (didn't get invol-Wid—Te 7 (that level) + +8 As far as the Ponzi scheme goes, the only 9 thing I cared about, Tonja, was being able to show the 10 investors that this case that I was utilizing to steal 11 a significant amount of money from them was a real 12 case. That's all I cared. about. + +13 Q. That case came into your office through 14 Mr. , corrpct1 He brought it with him when he 15 came to RRA? + +16 A. YeSc + +17 Q. C e was lead counsel on the case, correct? + +18 ' I assume he was lead counsel. I never 19 checke to see if he listed himself as lead counsel. + +20 Q. Do you know if any additional complaints 21 were filed while the case was at RRA? + +2 A. I have no idea one way or the other. + +3 Q. Did you ever instruct, in furtherance of 4 your Ponzi scheme, Mr. or anyone in that 25 litigation group to file additional complaints? + +**APP.30** + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 + +RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, + +Plaintiffs, + +vs. + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et' al, + +Defendants. + +DAY 1 ... AFT SESSION + +DEPOSITIOA sy + +• + +DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE:( Ah., ay,(DFaNBUF—T2)(2011 :00 p.M. - 5:00 p.m. 99 N.E. 'Fourth Street, Miami, FL + +-ROTHSTEIN + +Taken on Behalf of Razorback + +Examination of the witness taken before: + +Terri United Reporting, Inc. 1218 Southeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954)525-2221 + +> United Reporting, Inc. (954) 525- 2221 + +1 2 brought down boxes for you at a show, as to show these are the real oases? + +3 4 5 6 A I believe that a substantial number of the boxes wore already in my office. And there were additional boxes and I did have people bring them to me. I do4 remember who brought them to me, but yes. + +7 8 Q And do you recall Mr. Legamaro, wh d with respect to his review of those boxes of Soy? + +9 10 11 12 13 A I recall bringing the box e t e only real recollection I have of that mee after meeting with them and bringing the b I walked out for a eCt period of time, let them otlgh the boxes, came back in, answered questio nd4i:St ha hey had and we went forward. + +14 15 Q You-pulled-out-some-kind-of-a-flight-manifest;) do-you-recall-that?) + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 K) Learn. At-some-point-in-time-L-believe-it-was) either-Brad-Edwards-or-Russ-Adlor-pointed-out-to-me-that) one-of-the-pieces-of-evidence-they-were-using-in-the) actual-case-was-the-flight-manifest..) And actually-used) that-to-make-a-fairly-big-show.) f) found-that-those-most) of-the-time-in-these-cases-the-more-significant-our) underlying-investigation-was-and-the-more-tantalizing-it) 471;,)&7-;;;)fnterested-the-investors-got.) 4e-had-that) r-lr real-piece-of-evidence-and-we-used)itito-our-advantage-to) attempt-to-secure-the-investor.) + +1 Q Did Russ help you make it more tantalizing, that +2 manifest -- + +3 A Did he help me? + +4 Q Did he help you make it more tantalizing? + +5 A The only way Russ would have helped me make it +6 more tantalizing was by just discussing the size of the +7 case. But other than that, no, he didn't do anything +8 that I recall during that meeting with regard to the +9 actual manifest. I did.. + +10 Q (Didn't you add some sensational names to the +11 manifest that weren't there to start with? + +12 (A (I did. (I did. + +13 Q (Tell us about that. + +14 (A (There were -- I said that there were additional +15 manifests -- if I remember correctly, (I said there were +16 additional manifests that we had discovered containing +17 (Bill Clinton's name, (Prince Andrew, (all being shown +18 (flying with young girls on the plane. + +19 Q (And do you know whether -- let me back up) +20 (The original manifests that were in evidence in +21 (the [REDACTED] I case, didn't have those names on it? + +22 A (NO, (But it's interesting you bring that up +23 (because the way I came up with Bill Clinton and Prince +24 (Andrew was Mr. Adler and Mr. [REDACTED] both told me on +25 (different occasions that the reason the case , (when we + +1 (were discussing the actual real case, (the reason it was +2 (becoming so, (quote, (unquote, (tasty because they had +3 (information that he had been flying Bill Clinton around +4 (and Prince Andrews around, (the piece that was missing +5 (from the real case was the connection to the young girls. + +6 Q (the young girls) - (connection to the young girls +7 (was fiction, (it was a (lie? + +8 (A (Not as far as Mr. (Epstein is concerned but as +9 (far as the other people are concerned) (yes). + +10 Q Do you know whether Adler - Mr. Adler +11 or Mr. [REDACTED] injected any of that into the depositions +12 in the real case in order to assist with the Ponzi? + +13 A I don't know -- No, no, I don't know whether +14 they did that or not. I wouldn't think they would. + +15 Q (When you were asked) - (this morning about Brad +16 ([REDACTED] you really hesitated) (I don't know if you know +17 (you did that) (You were answering yes, no, maybe so) (On +18 (him you (really paused) + +19 (A (On the question as whether or not he would have +20 (turned us in) (you mean? + +21 (Q (Whether he was a player or whether he was +22 (involved and you didn't quite answer) + +23 (A (Just because of the way I (knew Brad and +24 (socialized with him, (I (did not know that he was at that +25 (level) (There are certain people, (Barry Stone, (second he + +1 found-out-about-it-would-have-absolutely-done-what-was +2 appropriately--- supposed-to-do-from-an-ethical +3 standpoint. And-then there-were-people-who-I would-say +4 would-never-do-that. And-then-there-are-people-in-the +5 middle. I believe-Brad-[REDACTED] is probably in the +6 middle. + +7 Q Did you have your investigators, that be Jenne +8 and Wayne Black and Fistas investigate Epstein himself +9 and try to get evidence from Epstein -- + +10 A I didn't know -- + +11 Q -- do you have of any knowledge of that? + +12 A No, sir. + +13 Q Did you instruct them to file any kind of +14 pleadings in federal Court or anything like that in order +15 to help you promote the Ponzi? + +16 A No. As far as the Epstein case is concerned, +17 Mr. Scherer, I never asked Mr. Adler or Mr. [REDACTED] or +18 anyone else associated with that case to do anything for +19 the purpose of furthering the Ponzi other than bring me +20 the boxes. That was all my creation. + +21 Q Thank you. + +22 I'm going to talk to you about Ted Morse a +23 little bit. You said he was one of your best friends, he +24 was one of your intercircle? + +25 A Correct. + +**APP.31** + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No: 09-062943 07 + +RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, + +Plaintiffs, + +vs. + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, + +Defendants. + +DAY 8 - AFTERNOON, + +DEPOSITION OF (SCOTT'10(ROTHSTEIN) + +DATE TAKEN: Wednesday, (December 21-,) (2011) + +TIME: 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. + +PLACE: James Federal + +Justice 11111., + +99 Northeast Fourth Street + +Miami, Florida 33124 + +0 Examination of the witness taken before: + +Terri + +United Repo., Inc. + +1218 Southeast Third Avenue + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 + +(954)525-2221 + +United Reporting, Inc. + +(954) 525- 2221 + +1 Q And you've testified that among the more 2 interesting items were doctored flight manifests where 3 you had inserted prominent people who purportedly would 4 have been on the flight where Epstein supposedly did what 5 he was accused of doing? + +6 A That's not correct. + +7 Q Go ahead and correct me. + +8 A The flight manifests that I show t em were 9 real flight manifests. I told them a ry about other 10 flight manifests that I have neve + +11 Q How thick were the fli nifests? + +12 A I don't recall. + +13 Q (I'm trying to undaid) (I'm not going to have 14 yot go hrough all 13 boxes(but I'm trying to get —73' O, (frame of refiTtiZT) (You're talking about a flight + +n. (manifest or flight manifests for a private jets,) right?, + +G3 Yes: ethis is a very small document) (It max + +a (have been one or two pages) (And I(had it specifically + +os (set aside) either ask Mr. Adler or Mr (Edwards + +a (isolate, ate flight manifest) + +21 =Q So other than looking at the flight manifest for 22 Epatein's private jet, what exactly is it that they were 23 looking at in these 13 boxes? + +24 A I have no idea. I left them alone to look at 25 the boxes for 20, 30 minutes. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb66d2a1eced3ccfd174666190601660483fb956 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198/EFTA02761198.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1485 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761198.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 38, + "chars": 59487, + "elapsed_seconds": 26.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.29962158203125, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.29962158203125, + 232.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 232.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRADLEY J. BOWARDS, ESQUIRE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 297.43199999999996, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 297.43199999999996, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 221.13000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 401.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 83.42999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B X H I B I T S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 433.908, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 433.908, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 196.02 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nGENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 496.79217529296875, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 496.79217529296875, + 152.27911376953125 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 152.27911376953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 524.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCASE No: 09-062943 07", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 487.68597412109375, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 487.68597412109375, + 160.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 160.5831298828125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 289 + ], + [ + "Line", + 132 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 320 + ], + [ + "Line", + 132 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 263 + ], + [ + "Line", + 132 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 287 + ], + [ + "Line", + 136 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761198" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea9558efcc69e5cf64d5aff4f89f16af16c70970 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.md @@ -0,0 +1,3773 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 8 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motio : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED] Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.32** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +- vs - + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, L.M., individually, and + +Defendants. + +G() + +. + +Repor Sandia Townsend, FPR No lic, State of Florida lm Beach Office Job #1358 + +#### VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION QF'WEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Wednesday, (Marc 17,) 2010, 10:17 a.r>lh 1;2/ p.m. + +( SB \ yan Boulevard Suite 400 Beach, Florida 33401 + +1 that question. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 Q. Have you ever acknowledged to — 4 A. Excuse me. 5 Q. — 6 A. Sir, may I suggest that if I say I refuse to 7 answer, that it means the Fifth, Sixth and 14th or would 8 you prefer that I recite it each time? 9 Q. I would prefer that you answer the questions, 10 that's my preference. But if you're going to assert a 11 privilege, I will assume that if you simply say that you 12 are refusing to answer, your refusal to answer will be 13 on the basis of various Constitutional privileges 14 against self-incrimination without the necessity of 15 specifying. 16 If your refusal to answer is on the basis of 17 any other privilege, it will be necessary for you to 18 identify that privilege. 19 A. Thank you. 20 MR. PIKE: And Pm going to instruct you, too, 21 when you do invoice, invoke the Fifth, Sixth and the 22 14th. 23 THE WITNESS: Yes. 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 25 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of + +1 invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 2 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 3 Terri Becker, acoSorter present at a deposition 4 taken by Brad in a -- in a case in which the 5 individual identified by the initials L.M. was a 6 Plaintiff that you knew and/or liked — 7 MR PIKE: Form. 8 THE WITNESS: Again, — 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 Q. - L.M.? 11 MR. PIKE: Same objection. 12 THE WITNESS: Again, I'm-going to have to 13 assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14Iltanendment Right. 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: 15 Q. Have you ever acknOftedged in the presence of 16 Steve Jaffe that you knew and?\* liked L.M.? 17 A. Again, Mr..Sdarola, though I'd like to answer 18 each and everyone of your questions today, I'm going to 19 have to, at the advice of Counsel, invoke my Fifth, 20 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 21. Q. Why ace you suing L.M.? 22 MR.R1RE: Form. 23 MR. SCAROLA: Let me state for the record that 24 it consider a form objection to be a proper 2 jection, unless you specify the defect in the + +1 J. hat you knew the individual 2 identified by the initials L.M.? 3 A. Fm going to have to refuse to answer 4 question. 5silamycsever acknowledged in\* 6 1 that you knew L.1%,4.?/ 1 7 MR. PIKE: Again, for purposeigtherecord, 8 I'm instructing you to invoke the Fifth Sixth and 9 14th; rather than just simplist7t7\_ 10 THE WITNESS: Okay. 11 MR. PIKE: -- I refuse to answer. I want it 12 to be clear for the Court that you have invoked 13 your Fifth, Sixth and 14th. 14 THE WITNESS: Fine. 15 Then on advice of Counsel, Pm going to have 16 to invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in Brad 19 presence that you liked the individual identified by the 20. initials L.M.? 21 A. Again, I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth, 22 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, Mr. Scarola. 23 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in 24 presence that you liked L.M.? 25 A. Again, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to + +17 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 form and provide me with an opportunity to correct the defect MR. PIKE: That's fine. I believe the rules provide otherwise. But, nonetheless, I stand on my objection to form. THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. You have to repeat the question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Why are you suing EM.? MR. PIKE: Form. (THEVITNESS7L7M7isp.rt of a conspiriq, (TvitlfSEARIRTAITsieh7BnTidleTalwrds eatinr—\_,- (excuse me — creating fraudulent cases of a ( cuall)Thhargedratu in—Vvliialitl U.S.—Attomey, (hralready—ZhWd-thTfin7cof Rotltsicin—a firm of VeliiallEtiffd1WEdWingis a partner, was a partner, with creating fabncating malicious cases rof a sexual nature, includingcases with respect to me specifically, in order to fleece unsuspecting (inversirT.SoTitliFIcTridarati tifFnillionsofi (dollars. BY MR SCAROLA: Q. (Wha- Wrolnoyou coMendtMiTilaTed.iirtla (crispirWc57r'we. fraudularses?, A. (17,M.'FtFssinWy\_bfor her'ire\_t/v—. rr,IIIIIIIL + +1 was dramatically -- sworn testimony to the FBI was + 2 dramatically different after she came in contact with + 3 Mr. [REDACTED] where her testimony then changed to + 4 sort of a hostile and had claims of -- claims never [REDACTED] + 5 before, never made to anyone before, and allegations + 6 that I've read in her Complaint that that had been + 7 dramatically different from the ones she had spoken to + 8 the FBI about, sir. + +9 Q. Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to + 10 the FBI was true? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. + +12 THE WITNESS: Mr. Scarola, unfortunately, + 13 today with respect to that question, I'm going to + 14 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment + 15 Right. Though I know -- I believe you know the + 16 answer to that question, I can't answer the + 17 question under advice of Counsel. And he's told me + 18 if I chose to do so, I risk losing his + 19 representation. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. What is the basis of your belief that I know + 22 the answer to the question? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: You -- I believe you have seen + 25 this, because you're supposed to be a decent + +1 lawyer, you've read the testimony. I would guess + 2 you've read the difference in her testimony to the + 3 FBI versus her testimony after she's met your + 4 client and his partners, who are currently in jail. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. How does that respond to my question as to + 7 whether you contend that her testimony to the FBI was + 8 true or false? + +9 MR. PIKE: Form. + +10 THE WITNESS: I don't believe that was your + 11 question. Will you repeat? + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Okay. Well, let's -- let me rephrase the + 14 question then. + +15 Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to + 16 the FBI was true? + +17 A. Sir, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm + 18 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + 19 Amendment Right. + +20 Q. Was L.M.'s statement to the FBI false in any + 21 respect? + +22 A. Sir, at least, again, today, on advice of + 23 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and + 24 14th Amendment Right. + +25 Q. Was L.M.'s subsequent testimony after, + +1 according to you, she met Mr. [REDACTED] and changed her + 2 testimony, true? + +3 A. Did she change her testimony? Is that -- yes, + 4 her testimony was changed. + +5 Q. My question to you is: Was her testimony + 6 which you contend was changed true testimony? + +7 A. Your question is not a good question. Is it + 8 her testimony before or after? + +9 Q. Was the subsequent testimony given by L.M. + 10 after she met Mr. [REDACTED] which you contend was + 11 different from her testimony before the FBI, was the + 12 subsequent testimony true or false? + +13 MR. PIKE: Form. + +14 THE WITNESS: Sir, I'm going, at least today, + 15 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and + 16 14th Amendment Right. + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Did you ever engage in any sexual conduct with + 19 L.M.? + +20 A. I would like to answer that question, but -- + +21 Q. You don't need to tell me what you'd like to + 22 do, Mr. Ep [REDACTED] You just need to do it, please. + +23 THE WITNESS: Please -- + +24 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, please let the witness + 25 finish his response. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: That's not a response to my + 2 question. + +3 MR. PIKE: In your mind it may not be a + 4 response. In a Judge's mind, it may be. We may + 5 have to certify it to the Court. If such a + 6 procedure even exists, we can take it up with the + 7 Court. But please let the witness finish his + 8 response. + +9 THE WITNESS: Again, please? + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +11 Q. Did you engage -- ever engage in any sexual + 12 conduct with L.M.? + +13 A. I would like to answer that question; however, + 14 today I'm going to have to assert my rights as provided + 15 by the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment to that question, + 16 sir. + +17 Q. Have you ever exchanged anything of value with + 18 L.M.? + +19 MR. PIKE: Form. + +20 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to + 21 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment + 22 Right, sir. + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +24 Q. Did you ever direct anyone to deliver anything + 25 of value to L.M.? + +1 MR. PIKE: Form. 2 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to 3 have to refuse to answer that question based on the 4 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q. Do you know 7 A. At least today, sir, l'm going to have to 8 refuse to testify about that question. Based on advice 9 of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 10 and 14th Amendment Ri t. 11 Q. Did introduce you to L.M.? 12 A. Sir, respectfully, I'd lace to answer that 13 question today. As I said, I'd like to answer each and 14 every one of your questions. However, on advice of my 15 Counsel today, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, 16 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 17 Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 18 any interaction between you and L.M.? 19 MR. PIKE: Form. 20 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question, 21 please? 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 24 any interaction between you and L.M.? 25 MR. PIKE: Form. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (Cvluch is outrageous. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. How much have you settled claims for? MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that question. MR. SCAROLA: And the basis of that instruction is? MR. PIKE: Confidential settlement agreements, to the extent that they exist. And the terms would be confidential. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Have you settled claims? A. Yes, I have. Q. What is the nature of claims you settled? MR. PIKE: I'm got instruct you not to answer that qu BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. How many claims have you settled? MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that question as well. MR. SCAROLA: What is the basis for those unctions? MR. PIKE: Confidential, as well as there is a ictim's Right Statute that may — you may be ing into the identity of — + +2 every one of your questions here today, I'd like to answer each and 1 THE WITNESS: 3 Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Co 4 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixdread 5 14th Amendment Right. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 Q. (Your Complaint in this action allegesChat 8 (L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion they 9 (alleged damages. What does diet mean?) 10 A. It means what it says. 11 Q. I don't understand it. Explain it to me. 12 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that 13 question without disclosing my conversations with 14 you or Mr. Clifton's conversations with you, as 15 wekes\_rnyxvork product, you can answer the 16 questita. 17 (THE' WITNESS: I believe that as part of th7 18 (Tcheme to defraud investors in South Florida out oft 19 (millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of) 20 (money were made on behalf of alleged victims across) 21 (the board. And the only way — in fact, ScottO 22 (Rothstein sits in jail. And what I've read in the) 23 (paper, claims that I've settled cases 6) 24 (P00-million, which is totally not true 25 (She has made claims of serious sum of money) + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: I'm not tiptoeing anywhere. MR. PIKE: Let me finish my objection, Mr. Scarola. You may be tiptoeing into the identity of various alleged victims underneath the Victims Right Statute, as well as ongoing investigations or past investigations that have remained open with the State, as well as the Federal Government. So in that regard, we would have to put the State Attorney, as well as the Federal Government on notice that you were seeking to potentially back door certain identities at this deposition. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Other than having alleOysien different testimony before she met Mr. then given after she met Mr. M, did L.M. do anything else that forms the basis for your claim against her? MR. PIKE: Form. Asked and answered. THE WITNESS: rd like to answer that question, as well as every one of your questions with respect to L.M. here today; however, on advice of Counsel, at least today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. Did L.M. fail to do anything that she had an +2 obligation, duty or responsibility to do -- + +3 MR. PIKE: Form. + +4 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +5 Q. -- that forms the basis for your claim against +6 her? + +7 MR. PIKE: I apologize. Form. + +8 THE WITNESS: Again? I'm sorry. Has she +9 failed to do? Can you repeat? + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +11 Q. Yes, sir. Lawsuits are generally based, civil +12 lawsuits are generally based on a claim that someone has +13 done something that they shouldn't have done or failed +14 to do something that they should have done. + +15 I asked you whether L.M. did anything that she +16 shouldn't have done and you asserted a Fifth Amendment +17 privilege in refusing to answer that question. + +18 I'm now attempting to find out whether L.M. +19 failed to do something that she should have done that +20 forms the basis of your claims against her. + +21 Did L.M. do anything that she should have done +22 that forms the basis of your claims against her? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, at least +25 today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to + +1 answer that question based on my Fifth Amendment, +2 Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. (Did Brad Edwards do anything that he shouldn't +5 (have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against +6 [REDACTED]?) + +7 MR. PIKE: Form. + +8 (THE WITNESS: Yes, many things.) + +9 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +10 Q. (List them for me, please.) + +11 (A. He has -- he has gone to the media out of, I +12 (believe, in an attempt to gin up these allegations. He +13 (has contacted the media. He has used the media for his +14 (own purposes. He has brought discovery -- he has +15 (engaged in discovery proceedings that bear no +16 (relationship to any case filed against me by any of his +17 (clients.) + +18 (His firm, which he's the partner of, has been +19 (accused of forging a Federal Judge's signature.) + +20 Q. I want to know what Mr. [REDACTED] -- + +21 MR. PIKE: One second. + +22 THE WITNESS: Excuse me. I'm answering. + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +24 Q. I want to know what Mr. [REDACTED] did. I'm not +25 asking you about allegations concerning his law firm. + +1 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, that's the second time +2 that I'm going to ask you not to interrupt the +3 witness when he's giving a response. He is giving +4 a response. When he finishes his response, you can +5 go on with your next question or you can -- you can +6 elicit any sort of information you intend to elicit +7 from the witness. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: He's being unresponsive. + +9 MR. PIKE: No, that's your contention. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: No, that's a fact. + +11 MR. PIKE: And you can take it up with a +12 Judge. And if we want to continue going back and +13 forth and bantering, not allowing the witness to +14 answer the question -- we're here for you today, +15 for you to ask the questions and for you to get +16 answers. But if you continue to banter with the +17 witness and interrupt the witness, I will adjourn +18 the deposition. This is not proper and we +19 certainly can take it up with the Judge. So that's +20 the second warning, Mr. Scarola. Please -- + +21 MR. SCAROLA: How many do I get? + +22 MR. PIKE: I'm not sure yet today. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. + +24 MR. PIKE: Okay? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Good. Then let's move on. + +1 MR. PIKE: But I can tell you one thing: On a +2 professional nature, just because you are +3 interrupting the witness and bantering with me, I +4 will adjourn the deposition. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 (Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt +7 (to, quote, gin up, unquote, these allegations and +8 (engaged in what you contend to [REDACTED] vant discovery, +9 (proceedings, what else did Mr. [REDACTED] personally, do +10 (that forms the basis for this lawsuit?) + +11 (A. Mr. [REDACTED] personally, engaged with his +12 (partners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail +13 (cell, potentially for the rest of his life, he shared +14 (information, what I've been told and -- excuse me -- +15 (what I've read in the newspapers, 13 boxes of) +16 (information that had my name on it, with other attorneys +17 (at his firm.) + +18 (He counseled his clients to maintain a +19 (position alleging multi-million dollar damages in order +20 (for them to scam local investors out of millions of +21 (dollars.) + +22 (He and his -- many of his other partners) +23 (already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S.) +24 (Attorney have been accused by the U.S. Attorney of) +25 (running a criminal enterprise.) + +1 Q. (Anything else?) + 2 MR. PIKE: Form. + 3 THE WITNESS: (Not I can think of at the + 4 (moment) + 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. (Okay. What media did Mr. Edwards go to?) + 7 (A. I am aware of at least the Daily News in New + 8 (York City) + +9 (I have been told by other people that there + 10 were other media, local media) + +11 (I've been told that the -- his investigator + 12 was sent to California to harass people representing + 13 (his -- Brad Edwards' investigator -- representing + 14 fictitiously, fraudulently that he was a FBI agent to + 15 try to gather information for Mr. [REDACTED] claims) + +16 Q. Does that have something to do with going to + 17 the media? + +18 MR. PIKE: Form. + 19 THE WITNESS: I've answered your question. + 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Does the investigator going to California to + 22 do something have something to do with the media? + +23 A. I believe I've also told that you that he's + 24 gone to the Daily News, sir; is that correct? + +25 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the + +1 witness' testimony as well. + 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +3 Q. Do you understand the question that you're + 4 supposed to be answering? + +5 MR. PIKE: Well, let's go ahead and repeat it. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: No, let's get an -- let's get an + 7 answer to that question. + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 9 Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed + 10 to be answering? + +11 A. When -- + 12 MR. PIKE: I'm confused. Wait one second. + +13 THE WITNESS: Sorry. + 14 MR. PIKE: I'm confused as to what question is + 15 on the table. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: And when your deposition is + 17 being taken, your confusion is relevant and + 18 material. + +19 MR. PIKE: Right. And it's -- + 20 MR. SCAROLA: When Mr. [REDACTED] -- excuse + 21 me -- when Mr. Epstein's deposition is being taken, + +22 I'm concerned with whether he understands the + 23 question being asked. + +24 MR. PIKE: Right. So... + 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed + 2 to be answering, Mr. Epstein? + +3 MR. PIKE: And I'm going to instruct you not + 4 to answer that question right now because as your + 5 Counsel I cannot let you answer that question until + 6 I understand what question is on the table. + +7 There's been a lot of bantering back and + 8 forth, so, Mr. Scarola, if you would respectfully + 9 repeat the question and then you may be able to ask + 10 him whether or not he understands the question. + 11 But I cannot allow him to answer a question that I + 12 don't understand is on the table. + +13 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 14 (Q. (What does an investigator going to California + 15 have to do with Mr. [REDACTED] allegedly going to the media + 16 (in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these + 17 allegations?) + 18 MR. PIKE: Please answer the question.) + 19 (THE WITNESS: Good. It's part of Mr. Edwards' + 20 scheme to involve people who have nothing to do + 21 with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back + 22 to the media and gin up his stories and make false + 23 allegations of people that have sexually charged + 24 nature cases in order to attempt to fleece + 25 investors, local investors out of millions of + +1 (dollars) + 2 (His firm has been accused by the U.S. Attorney + 3 (of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators) + 4 (by illegal wire taps, by illegal methods of + 5 (eavesdropping in order to go to the media and + 6 (generate cases)) + 7 (BY MR. SCAROLA:) + +8 (Q. (When did Mr. [REDACTED] go to the Daily News?) + 9 (A. I don't know)) + 10 (Q. (How did he go to the Daily News?) + 11 (A. I don't know)) + 12 (Q. What did he say to the Daily News?) + 13 (A. I believe Mr. Edwards knows that. I don't + 14 (know exactly what he said)) + 15 (Q. What is the source of your information that he + 16 went to the Daily News at all, ever?) + +17 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that + 18 question without violating any attorney/client + 19 privileges, you can answer the questions. + 20 (THE WITNESS: It's attorney/client) + 21 (BY MR. SCAROLA:) + +22 (Q. You said you were told by other people that he + 23 went to other media representatives?) + 24 (A. Yes, sir) + 25 (Q. Who are the other people that told you that?) + +1 A. 'I don't recall at the moment. + 2 Q. 'What did these other people who you don't + 3 remember tell you Mr. [REDACTED] did with respect to other + 4 media representatives besides the Daily News? + 5 A. 'Again, the question again? + 6 Q. 'What did these other people tell you + 7 Mr. Edwards did with respect to going to other media? + 8 MR. PIKE: Form. + 9 THE WITNESS: 'Mr. Edwards went to the media to + 10 gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm + 11 could generate profits, falsely taking in + 12 investors, creating false stories to the local + 13 medias and making statements to local press + 14 regarding false claims made by his clients in order + 15 that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, + 16 could defraud, along with his other partners of his + 17 firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of + 18 millions of dollars. + 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 20 Q. 'When did these other people whose identity you + 21 can't remember tell you these things that Brad [REDACTED] + 22 did? + 23 A. 'Sometime in the past year. + 24 Q. 'How many other people were there who told you + 25 these things about Mr. Edwards? + +1 themselves or were these anonymous callers? + 2 MR. PIKE: Form. + 3 THE WITNESS: Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, + 4 I don't recall with specificity. + 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 Q. 'What specifically did Mr. Edwards allegedly + 7 communicate to the Daily News to, quote, gin up these + 8 allegations, unquote? + 9 A. 'The newspapers have quoted Mr. [REDACTED] -- not + 10 quoted Mr. -- newspapers have made allegations referred + 11 to as Mr. [REDACTED] statements. + 12 MR. SCAROLA: Would you read the question + 13 back, please, Sandy? + 14 (Pending question was read.) + 15 MR. PIKE: Did he answer your question? + 16 MR. SCAROLA: No. + 17 MR. PIKE: Are you asking him again? + 18 THE WITNESS: So you're asking the question + 19 again? + 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 21 Q. Yes. + 22 THE WITNESS: Sorry. Could you repeat the + 23 question again? + 24 (Pending question was read.) + 25 THE WITNESS: He alleged that third parties + +1 A. 'I don't recall with specificity, + 2 Q. 'Well, do you recall in any degree how many + 3 there were? + 4 A. 'I would say, probably five to ten. + 5 Q. 'Where were you when these conversations took + 6 place that you can't -- the identity of whose + 7 participants you can't remember? + 8 MR. PIKE: 'So we're clear, within the last + 9 year, -- correct? -- timewise? + 10 MR. SCAROLA: 'Well, that's what your client + 11 said. 'I don't believe a word he says, but that's + 12 what he said: + 13 MR. PIKE: Form. Objection. Overbroad. + 14 THE WITNESS: 'Again, sir? + 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 16 Q. 'Yes, sir. Where did these conversations with + 17 these five to ten people take place whose identity you + 18 can't remember? + 19 MR. PIKE: Form. + 20 THE WITNESS: (On the telephone) + 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 22 Q. 'Who initiated the phone calls? + 23 A. 'Sir, these questions, I have no -- I don't + 24 have any recollection. + 25 Q. (Did the people who were on the phone identify) + +1 (had already been involved in some allegations to do + 2 with sexual misconduct) + 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 4 Q. Which third parties? + 5 A. 'I don't recall sitting here today. + 6 Q. (Involved how? + 7 MR. PIKE: Form. + 8 THE WITNESS: If I recall with specificity, if + 9 I had the articles in front of me, I would be able + 10 to recall. Maybe next time) + 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 12 Q. (What does "gin up these allegations" mean? + 13 MR. PIKE: Form. + 14 THE WITNESS: It means craft allegations of + 15 multi-million dollar cases; in fact, alleging in + 16 (L.M.'s case damages of \$50-million, settlements in + 17 order for Scott Rothstein and the rest of) + 18 (Mr. Edwards' partners to fleece unsuspecting + 19 (investors out of millions and millions of dollars + 20 (based on cases that didn't exist or alleged cases + 21 (that I had settled) + 22 Can I take a break? + 23 VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record, 10:50. + 24 (Brief recess.) + 25 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now on video record at + +1 10:57 a.m. + 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 3 (Q. (Was your reference to, quote, gin up these + 4 allegations, unquote, a reference to allegations made + 5 against you? + 6 MR. PIKE: Form. + +7 (THE WITNESS: As part of the vast conspiracy + 8 of the Rothstein firm and Mr. Edwards' + 9 participation in it, it has been alleged that many + 10 cases were fraudulently brought -- alleged that + 11 (have been brought; ginned up, meaning, crafted; + 12 multi-million dollar numbers put on cases in order + 13 to fleece investors, where his partner, Scott + 14 Rothstein, currently sits in jail for just those + 15 purposes, Mr. Scarola. + +16 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 17 Q. (My question to you is: Did the reference to + 18 quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations + 19 against you? + 20 A. (Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. + 21 (And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper + 22 reports) + +23 Q. Specifically what are the allegations against + 24 you which you contend Mr. [REDACTED] ginned up? + 25 A. I would like to answer that question. A, many + +1 Q. I want to know whether when you use the phrase + 2 "gin up" and the word "crafted," which you have told us + 3 is synonymous with gin up, -- + +4 A. Yes. + +5 Q. -- you mean fabricated? + +6 A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel, sir, and + 7 I've answered that question before, but if you didn't + 8 hear me the first time, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth + 9 and 14th Amendment Right. + +10 Q. (What specific discovery proceedings did + 11 Mr. [REDACTED] engage in which you contend form the basis + 12 for your lawsuit? + +13 (A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my + 14 attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with + 15 any of his clients or these lawsuits) + +16 Q. Which various people? Who? + 17 MR. PIKE: Form. + +18 (THE WITNESS: For example, he tried to depose + 19 (Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of getting + 20 (publicity so that he and his firm could + 21 (fraudulently steal, craft money from unsuspecting + 22 (investors in South Florida out of millions of + 23 (dollars) + 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 25 Q. Who else besides Bill Clinton is included in + +1 of the files and documents that we've requested from + 2 Mr. [REDACTED] and the Rothstein firm are still + 3 unavailable. + +4 With respect to anything that I can point to + 5 today, I'm, unfortunately, going to have to take the + 6 Fifth Amendment on that, Sixth and 14th. + +7 Q. You seemed to be defining ginned up as + 8 crafted; is that correct? + +9 A. That's correct. + +10 Q. Does ginned up or crafted mean fabricated? + 11 MR. PIKE: Form. + +12 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry, Mr. Scarola. I + 13 understand that you are trying to back door your + 14 way into a waiver of my Fifth Amendment. But + 15 respect to that question, I'm going to have assert + 16 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th + 17 Amendment Right. + +18 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 19 Q. So you are asserting your Fifth Amendment, + 20 Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right to remain + 21 silent about what you mean when you use the words "gin + 22 up" and "crafted;" is that correct? + 23 A. I don't believe that was your question. + +24 Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly my question. + 25 A. Would you repeat the question for me? + +1 your reference to various people? + 2 A. There are people in California. There are + 3 people in New York. + +4 Q. Would you name them for us, please? + 5 A. I'm sorry. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, + 6 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth + 7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +8 Q. Let's then talk about Bill Clinton, by whom I + 9 assume you mean former President Clinton; is that + 10 correct? + +11 A. That's correct. + 12 Q. All right. Do you know former President + 13 Clinton personally? + +14 A. I'm sorry. As I sit here today, though I'd + 15 like to answer that question, on advice of my Counsel, + 16 at least today, I'm going to have to take the Fifth, + 17 Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +18 (Q. You said something about Mr. Edwards sharing + 19 (13 boxes of information with somebody -- + 20 (A. Yes. + 21 (Q. -- as forming part of the basis for your + 22 (lawsuit against Mr. [REDACTED] correct?) + 23 (A. Correct. + 24 (Q. All right. With whom did Mr. Edwards share + 25 (these 13 boxes of information? + +1 A. (It has been reported in the Scherer Complaint +2 that he shared those boxes with the partners of his firm +3 that was then formally accused by the U.S. Attorney, +4 sir, of being a criminal enterprise. + +5 MR. PIKE: And just for purposes -- + +6 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +7 (Q. Do you remember my question? + +8 (A. You asked me who he shared it with? + +9 (Q. Yes. + +10 (A. The partners of his firm, sir. + +11 (Q. Okay. So part of the basis of your lawsuit is +12 that Mr. Edwards allowed members of his own law firm to +13 see 13 boxes of information; is that correct? + +14 (A. No, that's not correct. My claim is that the +15 13 boxes of information that were shown to investors by +16 Mr. Edwards' partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by +17 the press contain multiple cases, fraudulently -- and if +18 you like the word -- fabricated in order to fleece +19 investors out of money. The 13 boxes were shared with +20 investors, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Edwards' partners and some +21 of those partners currently under inditement, the others +22 already sitting in jail. + +23 Q. I had asked you earlier whether ginned up and +24 crafted meant fabricated and you asserted your Fifth +25 Amendment privilege. + +1 Are you now telling us that there were claims +2 against you that were fabricated by Mr. [REDACTED]? + +3 A. I'm going to again assert my Fifth, Sixth and +4 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +5 I would respond that the newspapers are very +6 clear that the cases were fabricated. + +7 Q. (Which newspaper said which case was +8 fabricated? + +9 A. (Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were +10 fabricated, to my best recollection. + +11 (The Scherer Complaint alleged many fabricated +12 cases, sir.) + +13 Q. Well, which of Mr. Edwards' cases do you +14 contend were fabricated? + +15 A. Again, we've requested most of the -- +16 information from the bankruptcy trustee. We've been +17 unable -- Mr. Edwards has not given us the total file, +18 but respect to any individual, I would have -- at the +19 moment I would have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th +20 Amendment claim, sir. + +21 Q. So you will not answer questions about whether +22 the claim on behalf of L.M. was fabricated; is that +23 correct? + +24 A. I believe I've already answered that, but, if +25 again, I'll have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +1 Amendment Right, sir. + +2 Q. Your Complaint also makes reference to a claim +3 on behalf of Jane Doe, referred to as Jane Doe versus +4 Epstein, case number 08-CIV-80893, a case pending in the +5 United States District Court for the Southern District +6 of Florida. + +7 Is it your contention that the claim on behalf +8 of Jane Doe is a fabricated claim? + +9 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question, +10 as well as every one of your other questions here today, +11 today I'm going to have to assert my rights as under the +12 Constitution of the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +13 Q. Do you know the real name of the person +14 referred to as Jane Doe in that case? + +15 A. I don't know which -- I'm sorry, sir. I do +16 not, sitting here today. + +17 Q. Did you ever have personal contact with the +18 person referred to by the name Jane Doe in that lawsuit? + +19 A. I'm sorry, sir. Sitting here today, I'm going +20 to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment +21 Right. + +22 Q. When did you first meet the person referred to +23 as Jane Doe? + +24 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each and every +25 one of your questions here today, at least with respect + +1 to that question, I'm going to have to assert my rights +2 under the Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth +3 Amendment. + +4 Q. Where did you first meet the person referred +5 to as Jane Doe? + +6 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question +7 here today, at least today on advice of Counsel, I'm +8 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth +9 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +10 Q. How many times have you been in the physical +11 presence of the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +12 A. The person referred to as Jane Doe? + +13 Q. Yeah. How many times have you been in her +14 physical presence? + +15 MR. PIKE: Form. + +16 THE WITNESS: At least -- at least sitting +17 here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to +18 assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th +19 Amendment Right. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with +22 Jane Doe? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: Now, for this purposes, you're +25 assuming this Jane Doe is somebody I know? I don't + +1 Q. Would your answer be the same with regard to 2 L.M. and to Jane Doe? + +3 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you if your 4 answer is the same, to invoke in hill. + +5 THE WITNESS: With respect to, I believe, Jane + +6 Doe — and who is the other person? I'm sorry. + +7 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +8 Q. L.M. + +9 A. L.M. Though I'd like to answer claims 10 with respect to all three of Mr. clients, on 11 advice of Counsel, at least today, Fm going to have to 12 invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights. + +13 Though I'd prefer to answer the question, Fve been told 14 that if I choose to do so, I risk losing their 15 icpiwentation. + +16 Q. Among those items listed by you as wrongdoing 17 on the part of Mr. forming the basis for this 18 lawsuit is that he, quote, counseled his clients to make 19 multi-million dollar claims against you; is that 20 correct? + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. Document speaks for itself. + +22 THE WITNESS: Document speaks for itself. + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +24 Q. I'm not asking about a document. I'm asking 25 you about the list of wrongdoing that you gave us during + +1 the course of this deposition, which you allege form t + +2 basis for your claim against Mr. 3 Is contention that among those + +4 Mr. did that form the basis for youj + +5 to have counseled his clients to make m 6 dollar claims against you? + +7 MR. PIKE: Form. + +8 THE WITNESS: What the n have said is 9 that the claims purported to have been made by the + +10 Rothstein firm and its partners;allege + +11 multi-million dollar claims where no claims exist. 12 However, respect specifically to my claim + +13 today, I'm going to have assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14 14th Amendment Right. + +15 MR. PIKE: Aiso, the question mischaracterizes 16 the witness' testimony. + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 Q. By whom was employed when he + +19 initiated litigation against you? + +20 A. I would like to know the answer to that 21 question. + +22 Q. So the answer to that question is, I don't 23 know? + +24 A. I would like -- + +25 Q. Correct? + +A. No. I answered that question, which is, I'd like to know. + +Q. Yes. But that isn't an answer to m iti.usfion. + +My question is: By whom was Mr. employed at the time that he initiated litigation against you? Do you know the answer to that question? + +A. Pd have no way of knowing the answer to that question, sir. + +C wliieh you contendion'rithibrsiraf this . Among the allegations of wrongdoing against laysuif irnelliinht7/ingtrdoWithending (investigator to California: + +(Wouldu yo retell please, more specifically (what it is thaCM%Eilwarcls d1 withnThrardrisendirTa (Friuwestigator to California which you contend araifieTzTleralllainWafilifWEdivardii + +MR. PIKE: Form. And also mischaracterizes the witness' testimony. + +WITNESS-Reported widelyin the (newspapers is the use of illegal activities, wire taps and methods by the Rotluiein firm while + +NinITtclinrstiPti=irT/ITFisten, whO's mentiagd the Complaint, represented himself as + +'S - Page 49 + +agent, falsely represented himself as an FBI (BY.MR7SCAROIN: + +3[Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of anythiiii 4 adtitili"."FiiiErdiarvIiiielli."Fistrvasin California?, + +5 MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer 6 that question without disclosing my conversation or 7 my firm's conversation or any of your attorneys' conversations with you, you can answer the 9 question. + +10 (TREWITNESS7FriWBased7ciii 11 rnatto ey/client privilege, I can't —ansrei) + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 Q. (Lilt your contention that Mr 4Edwirdsras + +14 (in—Crolild.in—ri nilleTaltvire—tapy — j 15 A. It was widely reported in the newspape + +16 (9., I'm not asking it was reported? 17 (S Excuse + +18 G.). — in the newspapir. 19 (A. Excus ne. + +20 (071 . want to know whether your contention is that 21 (MrEilv7gdras iirrols7rfirrariillerml7virrap.,, + +22 MR. PIKE: Try once spin to answer that 23 question. + +24 (THEVITNESSF-Ifiberwiaelyreporteciirta 25 newspaper that his firm and his partners were. + +1 (involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired + 2 (former FBI and law enforcement officials in order + 3 (to fabricate cases of a sexually charged nature + 4 (against me and others) + 5 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 (Q. (Do you have any personal knowledge of + 7 (Mr. Edwards ever having engaged in any illegal wire tap? + 8 (A. I have no personal knowledge; however, what I + 9 (read in the newspapers and is widely reported is that + 10 (his firm, and I believe Mr. Sakowitz went to the FBI + 11 (after he was told that the firm was engaged in illegal + 12 (wire taps and his partners were engaged in illegal wire + 13 (taps) + 14 (The FBI, the U.S. Attorney has accused his + 15 (firm of RICO, being the largest criminal fraud + 16 (enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in + 17 (illegal wire taps. But the answer specifically to your + 18 (question about personal knowledge, sir, no) + 19 (Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of + 20 (Mr. [REDACTED] ever having been involved in any illegal or + 21 (improper eavesdropping?) + 22 (A. (It's been widely reported in the newspapers in + 23 (South Florida that Mr. Edwards' firm, his partners were + 24 (involved in illegal wire taps, illegal fact gathering) + 25 (using what the newspapers quoted as sophisticated) + +1 (methods. Mr. Sakowitz, who was approached as an + 2 (investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a Complaint) + 3 (alleges similar activities. But personal knowledge + 4 (myself, sir, no) + 5 (Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that + 6 ([REDACTED] was ever involved in obstructions of + 7 (justice?) + 8 (MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer + 9 (that question without disclosing any + 10 (attorney/client communications with any of your + 11 (attorneys, you can answer that question.) + 12 (THE WITNESS: It's attorney/client privilege) + 13 (I'm afraid) + 14 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 15 (Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that + 16 (Bradley Edwards was ever involved in any actionable + 17 (frauds?) + 18 (MR. PIKE: Same -- same instruction, with any + 19 (of your lawyers.) + 20 (THE WITNESS: Yes. (Outside of the newspapers, + 21 (which have accused his firm of a monstrous fraud) + 22 (purported to be the largest fraud in South + 23 (Florida's history, accused by the U.S. Attorney) + 24 (where his partner sits in jail -- excuse me --) + 25 (reported in the newspapers of boxes of material on) + +1 (Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the + 2 (allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot + 3 (answer that question because of attorney/client + 4 (privilege) + 5 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 (Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that + 7 ([REDACTED] was involved in any egregious civil + 8 (litigation abuses?) + 9 (MR. PIKE: Form. Confusing.) + 10 (THE WITNESS: It's widely reported in the + 11 (newspaper that Mr. [REDACTED] firm engaged in + 12 (discovery processes, illegal activities, illegal + 13 (eavesdropping in order to fleece unsuspecting + 14 (investors in South Florida out of millions in + 15 (dollars by crafting, fabricating malicious cases of + 16 (a sexually charged nature in order to perpetrate a + 17 (fraud.) + 18 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 19 (Q. (Do you have any personal knowledge that + 20 ([REDACTED] ever forged Federal Court Orders and/or + 21 (Opinions?) + 22 (A. It's attorney/client privilege.) + 23 (Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that + 24 ([REDACTED] was ever involved in the marketing of + 25 (non-existing Epstein settlements?) + +1 (MR. PIKE: Same instruction.) + 2 (THE WITNESS: I'm sorry) (I would like to + 3 (answer that question, but on attorney/client + 4 (privilege I cannot today) + 5 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 (Q. (It is alleged in your Complaint that you were + 7 (subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics) + 8 (Other than those matters previously referred + 9 (to in earlier questions, is it your contention that + 10 (Bradley Edwards had any personal involvement in any + 11 (other, quote, abusive investigatory tactics?) + 12 (MR. PIKE: Form.) + 13 (THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the + 14 (newspapers that Mr. Edwards' firm was engaged in + 15 (widely -- wildly abusive practices throughout the + 16 (State of Florida in order to fleece unsuspecting + 17 (investors out of millions of dollars) + 18 (The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleges his firm + 19 (engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise) + 20 (Mr. Scherer's Complaint alleges monstrous + 21 (amounts of fraud and discovery abuse) + 22 (I have no personal knowledge, separate from + 23 (the attorney/client privileged information, + 24 (regarding Mr. Edwards) + 25 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 (Q. [Do you have any personal knowledge that +2 Bradley [REDACTED] ever filed legal papers that were +3 unsupportable? + +4 MR. PIKE: I'm going to object to form. +5 And to the extent you can answer that question +6 without disclosing any attorney/client +7 communications with any of your attorneys, I'm +8 going to allow you to answer that question. + +9 THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it's attorney/client +10 privilege. + +11 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +12 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that +13 Mr. [REDACTED] was ever involved in any conduct that, +14 quote, compromised the core values of both State and +15 Federal justice systems in South Florida? + +16 MR. PIKE: Form. + +17 (THE WITNESS: Can you just ask -- can you +18 define for me what you mean by "personal +19 knowledge," sir? + +20 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 (Q. (Yes. Did you ever see, hear, smell, taste, or +22 touch anything that communicated to you directly and not +23 through the report of some third person or newspaper +24 that Bradley [REDACTED] was personally involved in +25 compromising the core values of both State and Federal + +1 (justice systems in South Florida? + +2 (MR. PIKE: Form) + +3 (Same instruction with regard to +4 attorney/client) + +5 (THE WITNESS: Yes. Are you suggesting that +6 anyone who told me specifically or things that I +7 might have read that specifically relate to him, is +8 not what you've been asking me for? + +9 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +10 (Q. (Yes, sir, that's exactly right) + +11 (A. You told me if I hear something, that's not +12 personal knowledge) + +13 (Q. (Not if you hear it from somebody else) + +14 (A. (Who else would I hear it from, besides +15 somebody else, sir?) + +16 (Q. (Well, if you heard it directly yourself) + +17 (A. From who?) + +18 (Q. (Maybe Mr. Edwards) + +19 (A. Uh-huh. Is that the only person, sir?) + +20 (Q. (That's the only person, that's correct) + +21 (A. Well, if it's the only person, separate from +22 attorney/client privilege, I cannot answer that) + +23 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a purpose in +24 filing this lawsuit to, quote, "vindicate the +25 hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who + +1 were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the +2 subject of this Complaint," unquote. + +3 Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers +4 that you are seeking to vindicate? + +5 MR. PIKE: Form. + +6 Give me a minute. What page of the Complaint +7 are you referring to? + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Page 2. + +9 MR. PIKE: Give me one second. + +10 THE WITNESS: Can we go off the record just +11 for a second? + +12 MR. PIKE: If it's okay with Mr. -- + +13 THE WITNESS: It's a bathroom break. + +14 MR. PIKE: There's a question pending and +15 usually -- + +16 THE WITNESS: Sorry. + +17 MR. PIKE: Just give me a second. +18 Okay. + +19 THE WITNESS: Where is it? + +20 MR. PIKE: It's page 2 of the Complaint, which +21 has my notes on it down here, the last sentence. + +22 And to the extent that you have knowledge and +23 can answer that question, you can do so. + +24 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question +25 for me, sir? + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +2 Q. Yes, sir. (Your Complaint makes reference to a +3 purpose in filing this lawsuit -- + +4 (A. Yes) + +5 (Q. -- to vindicate the hardworking and honest +6 lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by +7 the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint) + +8 (A. Yes, sir) + +9 (Q. (Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers +10 on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint?) + +11 MR. PIKE: Okay. Form. Mischaracterizes the +12 Complaint itself. + +13 To the extent you understand that question, +14 you can attempt to answer, if you recall. + +15 (THE WITNESS: Yes) + +16 (The U.S. Attorney, sir, has accused the +17 Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system, +18 a level of abuse never seen before in the United +19 States history, of forging documents, an affront to +20 any decent lawyer, signing Judge's Orders, sending +21 false statements to other lawyers. The people who +22 have been -- excuse me -- the Complaint by the U.S. +23 (Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the +24 law firm, as well as Mr. -- my Complaint says) +25 (Mr. [REDACTED] being a part of that) + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: +2 Q. Now, before you answered that question, you +3 reviewed a document, right? + +4 A. The Complaint, sir. +5 Q. I'd like to see it, please. + +6 MR. PIKE: Definitely not, Mr. Scarola. +7 My notes are on that and that's +8 attorney/client. I allowed the witness to take a +9 look at the document and he did not write anything +10 on the document. He looked at the document. +11 That's my client. And you will certainly not be +12 looking at my notes, which are all over this +13 document. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: He didn't look at everything. +15 He looked at one page. I would like that one page, +16 please. + +17 MR. PIKE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. +18 MR. SCAROLA: I would like that page marked as +19 an Exhibit to this deposition. + +20 MR. PIKE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: I would state for the record +22 that it is my intention, since that page with +23 handwritten notations on it was reviewed by the +24 witness during the course of this deposition while +25 a question was pending, I want that page preserved + +1 so that the Court can make a determination as to +2 whether I am entitled to see it. + +3 MR. PIKE: I would object based upon +4 attorney/client and work product in that regard. + +5 THE WITNESS: Now can we take a bathroom +6 break? + +7 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, because you still +8 haven't answered my question. + +9 THE WITNESS: Okay. +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +11 (Q. 'I want to know who the quote, "hardworking +12 and honest lawyers" are that are referred to in that +13 section of your Complaint: + +14 (A: My attorneys, at least, are honest: + +15 (Q. Which ones? + +16 (A: All of them: + +17 (Q. And you say that you want to vindicate the +18 hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients? + +19 (A: That's correct: + +20 (Q. Which clients? + +21 (A: Me, some of the other clients; in fact, abused +22 by the Rothstein firm. I don't know the full extent; +23 Hopefully when we get to trial, we're going to find out +24 the extent of the people, the lawyers, the clients that +25 were abused by Mr. Edwards and the Rothstein firm: + +1 We have asked for Scott Rothstein's +2 deposition. We hopefully will get it. Maybe he will +3 give us some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact, +4 been handled and the abuses they've undergone, including +5 forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. + +6 Q. Now, was it your intention in this sentence to +7 say that you were trying to vindicate the hardworking +8 and honest lawyers and their clients? + +9 A. It's attorney/client. I'm sorry. + +10 Q. Your intention is attorney/client privileged? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. I'm not quite -- + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Is that what you're telling us? + +14 MR. PIKE: Wait a second. I'm not quite sure +15 I understand the question. + +16 THE WITNESS: What's the question? + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Were you attempting to communicate in this +19 Complaint a desire on your part to vindicate hardworking +20 and honest lawyers and their clients? + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. + +22 THE WITNESS: In this Complaint, I intend to +23 get to the truth of Mr. [REDACTED] behavior and the +24 Rothstein firm, sir. + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. Well, what this sentence says is, quote, -- + +2 A. Yes. + +3 Q. -- "the Rothstein racketeering enterprise +4 endeavored to compromise the core values of both State +5 and Federal systems in South Florida and to vindicate +6 the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who +7 were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the +8 subject of this Complaint." + +9 Is that what you meant to communicate? + +10 A. It says what it says, sir. + +11 Q. Well, I know it says what it says. I'm trying +12 to find out if that's what you meant to say; that is, +13 that the Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to +14 vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their +15 clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct +16 that is the subject of this Complaint. + +17 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the +18 language of the document. + +19 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I think you've misread +20 that again. You want to -- I certainly didn't ask +21 for the Rothstein firm to vindicate the lawyers, is +22 what you've just -- + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +24 Q. Well, that's what I'm trying to find out, +25 whether you meant to say what you said in this + +1 Complaint. + +2 Did you read the Complaint before it was +3 filed? + +4 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. + +5 THE WITNESS: Thank you, sir. + +6 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +7 Q. Did you read the Complaint before it was +8 filed? + +9 A. It was a while ago, yes, sir. + +10 Q. And did you approve the Complaint prior to its +11 filing? + +12 A. Yes, sir. + +13 Q. (And did you mean to say what this sentence +14 says, "the Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored +15 to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and +16 their clients, who were adversely affected by the +17 misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint?") + +18 (MR. PIKE: (Okay. I'm going to move to strike. +19 Mischaracterizes the language of the document. + +20 (The document reads as follows, for purposes of +21 the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise +22 endeavored to compromise the core values of both +23 (State and Federal justice systems in South Florida +24 and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers +25 and their clients who were adversely affected by + +1 (the misconduct that is the subject of this +2 (Complaint.) + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. (Is that what you meant to say? + +5 (A. What I meant to say, it is -- seems to me +6 somewhat unclear -- is that the Rothstein firm, along +7 with Mr. Edwards, is part of a criminal enterprise, the +8 largest -- excuse me -- the largest criminal enterprise +9 in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, +10 engaging in illegal wire taps, illegal behaviors. And +11 part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which means, I +12 believe should set right. + +13 (And if it's not clear, the Rothstein firm +14 compromised the core values of our legal justice system. +15 It abused every -- many of the precepts, the most basic +16 values of the American justice system. + +17 (And, in fact, I believe this lawsuit, part of +18 the reason for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the +19 various techniques of attorney/client privilege, abuse +20 of technique, abuse of discovery, illegal wire taps, +21 forging signatures engaged in by both Mr. [REDACTED] and +22 his firm. + +23 Q. (So it is your contention that Mr. [REDACTED] was +24 part of a criminal enterprise?) + +25 A. (Yes, it is) + +1 Q. (Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? + +2 MR. PIKE: Form. + +3 (THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: You wanted to take a break and +5 before I move on to another subject, we'll do that. +6 But I want -- I want to observe for the record that +7 the last break was less than an hour ago. While I +8 want to try to make reasonable accommodations to +9 witnesses so as not to impose unnecessarily upon +10 their physical comfort, I will object to breaks +11 occurring at less than one-hour intervals during +12 the course of this deposition. + +13 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now off video record. It +14 is 11:34 a.m. + +15 (Brief recess.) + +16 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video +17 record. It is 11:45 a.m. and we are on media +18 number two. + +19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +20 (Q. What knowledge do you have of Bradley [REDACTED] +21 ever having personally engaged in mail fraud?) + +22 (A. It's been widely reported in the press --) + +23 (Q. (I'm going to withdraw my question.) + +24 (What personal knowledge do you have of Bradley +25 Edwards ever having been engaged in any mail fraud?) + +1 A. (Will you describe what you mean by "personal +2 knowledge," sir?) + +3 (Q. (I mean direct observation through your senses +4 on your part.) + +5 (A. So are you asking me whether or not I've +6 witnessed him sending something directly, putting +7 physically in the mail, sir?) + +8 (Q. (I'm asking whether you have ever personally +9 witnessed [REDACTED] ever having engaged in mail +10 fraud.) + +11 (A. I'm not sure how that's possible for anybody +12 to witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's +13 done?) + +14 (Q. (So the answer to my question is, you don't +15 know; is that correct?) + +16 (A. My answer to your question is --) + +17 (MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the +18 witness' testimony.) + +19 (THE WITNESS: I've asked for a clarification.) + +20 (BY MR. SCAROLA:) + +21 (Q. Have you ever personally witnessed Bradley +22 Edwards engaging in mail fraud?) + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 (THE WITNESS: No, sir.) + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. (Have you ever personally witnessed [REDACTED] + 2 [Edward - [REDACTED] engaged in wire fraud? + 3 (A. How would one -- I'm not sure how anyone would + 4 personal -- have personal knowledge, witness someone + 5 engaging in wire fraud, unless they were simply sitting + 6 over their computer looking at their bank accounts. So, + 7 unfortunately, I would have to say, no, sir. + 8 (Q. (Have you ever personally witnessed Bradley + 9 [REDACTED] engaged in money laundering? + 10 MR. PIKE: Form. + 11 (THE WITNESS: Again, sir, the U.S. Attorney's + 12 (Complaint of the Rothstein firm alleges money + 13 (laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, RICO claims of + 14 (Mr. Edwards' partners and his firm, calling the + 15 (firm the largest criminal enterprise in South + 16 (Florida's history, accused of fabricating malicious + 17 cases, sir, of a sexually charged nature in order + 18 to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of + 19 (millions of dollars. + 20 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 21 (Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein; + 22 (whether you have any evidence whatsoever that + 23 (Mr. [REDACTED] ever personally participated in any of that + 24 (wrongdoing? + 25 MR. PIKE: To that question, to the extent you + +1 (payout settlement? + 2 MR. PIKE: Form. + 3 (THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer that question + 4 (by saying that the newspapers have reported that + 5 (his firm was engaged in fraudulent structured + 6 (settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida + 7 (investors. + 8 (With respect to my personal knowledge, I'm + 9 (unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward + 10 to at some point being able to disclose it, today + 11 (I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client + 12 (privilege. + 13 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 14 (Q. Your Complaint alleges that Rothstein and + 15 (others in RRA were using RRA to market investments. + 16 (Who are the others referred to in the + 17 (Complaint? + 18 (A) (From my understanding of the U.S. Attorney's + 19 (Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it is the + 20 (partners and people who held themselves out to be + 21 (partners of the Roth -- Scott Rothstein, including + 22 (Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. Edwards and other people + 23 (associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane + 24 [REDACTED] if that's how you pronounce her name, + 25 (Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm + +1 can answer it without violating attorney/client and + 2 work product, you can answer the question. + 3 (THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it will be + 4 (attorney/client privilege, sir. + 5 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 (Q. Do you have any evidence -- knowledge of any + 7 (evidence whatsoever that Mr. Edwards ever participated + 8 (in any effort to market any kind of investment in + 9 (anything? + 10 (A. I would have to claim attorney/client + 11 (privilege on that, sir. + 12 MR. PIKE: Form. + 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 14 (Q. (Do you have knowledge of any evidence + 15 (whatsoever that Mr. [REDACTED] was ever a participant in + 16 (devising a plan through which were sold purported + 17 (confidential assignments of a structured payout + 18 (settlement? + 19 A. (The newspapers and blogs have widely reported + 20 (that Mr. Edwards' firm crafted -- would you repeat the + 21 (question for me, again, sir? I'm sorry. + 22 Q. (Yes, sir. I want to know whether you have any + 23 (knowledge of evidence that Bradley Edwards personally + 24 (ever participated in devising a plan through which were + 25 (sold purported confidential assignments of a structured + +1 (currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar + 2 (or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. + 3 (Q. (Which -- which source of information + 4 (referenced in that answer specifically made reference to + 5 (Mr. Edwards? + 6 (A) (I don't recall, sir. + 7 Q. But you do have a recollection that one or + 8 more of them did; is that correct? + 9 A. I don't recall, sir. + 10 Q. So you want to withdraw the earlier response + 11 that you made and your real answer is, I don't know; is + 12 that correct? + 13 MR. PIKE: Mischaracterizes the witness' + 14 testimony. Move to strike. + 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 16 Q. Your response, sir? + 17 A. My answer stays the same, sir. + 18 Q. Is it your contention that one or more + 19 lawsuits was fabricated against you? + 20 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers -- + 21 Q. That's not my question. + 22 A. Excuse me. I was answering. + 23 MR. PIKE: Please let the witness answer the + 24 question, Mr. Scarola. + 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. No, you're not answering my question. 2 MR. PIKE: He's only said three words, so you 3 don't know whether he's answering your question or 4 not. 5 MR. SCAROLA: I didn't ask him anything about 6 newspapers. I asked him about his contention. I 7 don't know he's not answering my question. 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 Q. But you can go ahead, Mr. Epstein, and you can 10 make your silly speech one more time. 11 MR. PIKE: Fm going to move to strike. 12 THE WITNESS: You want to repeat the question? 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 Q. Yes, sir. I would like to know whether it is 15 your contention that one or more lawsuits have been 16 fabricated against you. 17 A. My contention, sir, is that the firm of 18 partners, Scott Rothstein, fabricated many 19 cases, reported by the press and the U.S. Attorney, 20 amongst people like me and others of a sexually charged 21 nature in order to fleece investors of South Florida out 22 of millions of dollars. 23 Do I have a with respect to my individual 24 cases that Mr. has filed in these three cases, 25 I'm unfortunately today, and only today at least, on + +1 advice of Counsel I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, 2 Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. 3 Q. Okay. Well, I'm not limiting my quesd 4 the three cases referenced in your Complaint/I yin 5 know whether you contend that any claim against you has 6 been fabricated? 7 MR. PIKE: Form. Overbroad and confusing and 8 it's compound. 9 THE WITNESS: The question makes no sense to 10 me. Pm sure you could do better. 11 BY MR.. SCAROLA:, 12 Q. Is there anyPending claim against you which 13 you contend is flibricated? 14 A. At least teday, sir, I'm going to have to 15 respondlyaantintiny Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment 16 Right. \--- 17 MR. PIKE: Form, also. 18 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 Q. Is it your contention that was 20 ever personally involved in manufacturing false and/or 21 fraudulent Court Opinions or Orders? 22 A. Attorney/client privilege. 23 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to someone 24 sifting through a potential defendants garbage looking 25 for damaging evidence to use with investors to show how + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2,,S\niu 24 potential defendants could be, in essence, blackmailed. MR. PIKE: Would you identify for me, Mr. Scarola, what page? MR. SCAROLA: Page 8, paragraph 19. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? MR. PIKE: One second. In light of clarity, Mr. Scarola, would you please read the entire paragraph so Mr. Epstein understands the tenor of the paragraph? MR. SCAROLA: No. I want to know whether anyone ever sifted through It garbage through Mr. Epstein's garner. Mtn the pending question. MR. PIKE: Tcrifantelit you understand the question, you can answeti l THE WITNESS: I think the question is poorly phrased. Did anyone ever sift through my garbage? Whatdnes that mean? BY Mt SC OLA: n't know what sifting through garbage Does that mean the garbage man? Does that the garbage man? I'm sure he sifted through my + +17 garbage. Q. Which garbage man sifted through your garbage? 3 A. I'm sure people who go through garbage sift 4 through the garbage. I have no idea. 5 Q. Did anyone ever sift through your gerbils 6 (IcTollin-Ifirdar--firginj-Fiilei li? 7 (A. it's been widely reported in the newspapm 8 (iiiTitill that- eng,ageliiiiiftin—g-thrrx(gh 9 many people's garbage in order— in an attempt to 10 blackriailihn. 11 Q. Yes. But I didn't ask you what some newspaper 12 is alleged to have reported. 13 What I did ask you is whether anyone ever 14 sifted through your garbage looking for damaging 15 evidence. 16 And the answer to that question, I think, can 17 be either yes, no, or I don't know. 18 NM. PIKE: Move to strike. 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 Q. • Or you could refuse to answer it on the 21 grounds that it may tend to incriminate you. 22 A. I think you might — 23 MR PUCE: Move to strike. 24 THE WITNESS: I would like to answer my own 25 questions. If you'd like to answer all my + +1 questions, Mr. Scarola, I'm more than happy to sit 2 here and answer them. Would you like to continue? + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. (Yerrc likitElarvwhWthe answer trIthit 5 (question is. Did anyone ever sift through your garb:trio 6 (I cTol)rig-for damagingevidence? + +7 MR. PIKE: Form. + +8 (THE WITNESS71115iff WER. + +9 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +10 Q. Did you ever have damaging evidence in your 11 garbage? + +12 A. What's damaging evidence, sir? + +13 Q. Evidence tending to implicate you in criminal 14 conduct. + +15 MR PIKE: Form. + +16 THE WITNESS: At least today, Mr. Scarola, 17 with these — with your questions and your claims 18 and your defense of Mr. and his firm, the 19 Rothstein firm, while his partner sits in jail, + +20 today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth + +21 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +23 Q. Did you ever have any evidence in your garbage 24 that would subject you to blaclanail? + +25 MR. PIKE: Form. Same — same objection. + +1 You've been interchanging knowledge with personal 2 knowledge. And many of the objections to which I 3 am asserting an attorney/client and work product privilege arc based upon your malphrased question 5 and use of personal knowledge and knowledge 6 interchangeably with those questions. + +7 So if you want to rephrase your question to 8 attempt to elicit a response let me finish — 9 then I have no objection to that. However, I'm not 10 going to sit hero and allow my client to waive 11 attorney/client and work product. + +12 Now, to the extent you're saying Pm coaching 13 the witness, I object to that because I am 14 certainly not. The witness bi here to answer your 15 questions and I believe has been answering your 16 questions today tothe best of his ability. + +17 MR. SCAR ; I arp saying you're coaching the 18 witness. + +19 BY MR. SC LA:" + +20 Q. Could you answer the question? + +21 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +22 THE WITNESS: You'll have to repeat it. + +23 SCAROLA: + +24 (ps7rou have information mclicaturithrit 2 ey Edwards ever had any knowledge of anyone + +2 the question by asserting my Fifth, Sixth and 14 THE WITNESS: Again, I'll respectfully answer 1 3 Amendment Right. + +ir2 + +4 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +5 Q. Your Complaint in paragraph 21,0ge 6 that: "Upon information and belief R tein, D d 7 Boden, Debbie= Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten 8 and Kenneth Jenne, all employees of RRA, through brokers 9 or middle men would stage regular meetings during which 10 false statements were made about the number of 11 cases/clients that existed or RRA had against Epstein 12 and the value thereof? + +13 Do you have any knowledge that Mr. 14 ever knew aboutsuch meetings being conducted? + +15 MR. PIKE: Form. + +16 To the atent you understand the question and 17 it will not violate any attorney/client or work 18 product privilege information, you can answer that 19 question. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, it has become evident 21 that that speaking instruction to your witness is 22 an instruction for him to assert an attorney/client 23 privilege, regardless of whether it is or is not 24 valid and I object to it. + +25 MR. PIKE: Let me make the record clear. + +44\ 1 1 (associated with the Rothstein firm holding meetinTs (dirring which, quote, "false statements were made about 3 (the number of cases/clients that existed or RRA hid 4 Grainst Epstein and the value thereof," unquote? + +5 MR. PIKE: Form. Same objection. + +6 (THE WITNESS: My best recollection is the UTS) 7 (Attorney has accused the Rothstein firmeifjtIsi 8 (those types of meetings where the partners got 9 together, schemed to defraud local investors of) 10 (millions of dollars by fabricating cases of3 11 sexuallycharged nature. And whether Mr. Edward 12 personally rticipaUadTrn itt lerT'sf 13 at tay, sir, have to assert the attorneyklieit 14 (Ir(Cfilege, but look forward to one day disclor4 15 (111. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike all unresponsive 17 portions of the answer. + +18 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +19 © (Paragraph 23 f our Complaint says tht? 20 (1KRA, Rothstein and cliirTling the needla 21 anonymity with regard to existing abricated clients, 22 (i y were able to effectively use initials." + +23 (to you have any knowledge that 24 (fabricated a client toa claim against you?( + +25 MR. PIKE: Form. + +1 THE WITNESS: I believe Mr. Scherer's + 2 Complaint + 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 4 Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. + 5 I'm asking about any evidence that you have. + 6 MR. PIKE: The witness is basically been five + 7 words into his sentence and you're not allowing him + 8 to finish, once again. + 9 So if you recall the question, then please + 10 respond. + 11 THE WITNESS: Please repeat it back, please? + 12 MR. PIKE: Madame Court Reporter, if you + 13 would. + 14 (Pending question was read.) + 15 MR. PIKE: Form. + 16 THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and + 17 (his claim against the Rothstein firm for a massive + 18 (fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to -- at + 19 (least in the -- described in the public press, + 20 (because he went to the FBI, for fabricating cases + 21 (that included initials. + 22 (With respect to anything specific with + 23 (Mr. Edwards, I'm going to have to claim the + 24 (attorney/client privilege today, sir. + 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 MR. PIKE: -- then, please, -- + 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. + 3 MR. PIKE: -- answer Mr. Scarola's question. + 4 THE WITNESS: Separate from -- + 5 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching the + 6 witness. + 7 THE WITNESS: Separate from the communication + 8 I've had with my attorneys, I can't answer that + 9 question. + 10 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, I'm confused. I + 11 started objecting to form in the beginning of this + 12 deposition. You then instructed me, which is + 13 against the rules, Mr. Pike, I don't know what's + 14 wrong with the form. I object to you objecting to + 15 form. + 16 Then I assert the attorney/client, work + 17 product, and now you're telling me I'm coaching the + 18 witness. + 19 So tell me, Mr. Scarola, what is the -- what + 20 is the way that you would like me to object in this + 21 deposition, and maybe I can conform that way for + 22 you, which may or may not be consistent with the + 23 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + 24 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, -- + 25 MR. PIKE: Yes, sir. + +1 Q. (Do you have any -- do you have knowledge of + 2 (the existence of any evidence that Bradley Edwards knew + 3 (that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi + 4 (scheme?) + 5 MR. PIKE: Form. + 6 (THE WITNESS: That's attorney/client + 7 (privilege) + 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 9 (Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence that + 10 (would indicate [REDACTED] Ed [REDACTED] should have known that + 11 (Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi + 12 (scheme?) + 13 MR. PIKE: Form. + 14 THE WITNESS: At least today -- + 15 MR. PIKE: Wait. + 16 THE WITNESS: Sorry. + 17 MR. PIKE: Form. Same objections. Same + 18 attorney/client, work product as to the last + 19 question. Same objections here, attorney/client + 20 work product. + 21 THE WITNESS: And today I'm going to have to + 22 (assert the attorney/client privilege. + 23 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that + 24 question -- + 25 THE WITNESS: I understand. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: -- if you don't know the + 2 difference between a form objection and a privilege + 3 objection -- + 4 MR. PIKE: Right. + 5 MR. SCAROLA: -- then this deposition is not + 6 the proper context in which for you to learn the + 7 difference between a form objection and a privilege + 8 action. + 9 MR. PIKE: I'm pretty clear on what a form + 10 objection is and what a privilege objection is and + 11 I'm pretty knowledgeable on that. The problem -- + 12 MR. SCAROLA: Then we don't need to engage in + 13 any further discussion. + 14 MR. PIKE: -- I want to try to make the record + 15 clear, because initially you didn't want me to + 16 object to form. You wanted me to speak. So I'm + 17 thinking you're conceding to that point. + 18 What my question is, is: What's wrong with my + 19 objecting to attorney/client, work product? So I + 20 guess I'm asking you what you were asking me + 21 earlier on. What's wrong with the form? + 22 We can just move forward. + 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 24 Q. In your Complaint you identify the RRA law + 25 firm, Rothstein and [REDACTED] as the, quote, "litigation + +1 team," unquote. 2 You then go on to say in paragraph 31 of your 3 Complaint at page 12 that: "Rothstein and the 4 litigation team" — 5 MR. PIKE: Wait a minute. Put that down for a 6 second. Hold on. 7 THE WITNESS: You can read it. 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 Q. 'Individually and in a concerted effort may 10 have unethically and illegally engaged in certain 11 specified conduct" 12 May we correctly conclude from that statement 13 that you don't have any knowledge as to whether the, 14 quote, litigation team," including Mr. S engaged 15 in any unethical and illegal conduct? 16 MR. PIKE: For now, while Pm reviewing the 17 document itself, I'm just going to just tell you to 18 hold off — 19 THE WITNESS: Sure. 20 MR. PIKE: -- on answering that question. 21 You may want to go otTthe record, so we don't 22 have a lag in — 23 MR. SCAROLA: No, I'd like it on the record. 24 Thank you. 25 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, did you bring an extra + +1 copy of the Complaint that you're questioning 2 Mr. Epstein on for Mr. Epstein to look at? 3 MR. SCAROLA: No. 4 MR- PIKE: Okay. I'm going to ha 5 him a copy so he can — the paragrapheof 6 Complaint are very long and the CoMplaint itlElf is 7 in excess of — it was approximatelyttpages, 8 9 MR. SCAROLA: I'll withdowalte question. 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: - 11 Q. (Do you haveanyovidence thatErad Edward!, 12 cold;allowed to be soldigil/or assisted7iththe sit 13 (of an interest in-non-settled personal Injury lawsuits? 14 MR7PIKJ3: Form. 15 TIM WITNESS:(Thenewspapers have widely, 16 (reported that the Rothstein-firm engaged in illegal 17 (structured -sVtlementSofcaseeof exual as naturei 18encludingspecifically-me:-We have subpoenaed the 19 i(c cumentafrom•Mr1M7dhis finnand we have 20 er 2t. been able to get them as of ye/3 21 l —arrronlident that once we do be able 22 (to-answer your questions with-more-specificity; 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 Q. (As you sit here today; do you have any/ 25 (evidence whatsoever to support an-assertion that + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24s , 2 (SiEdiiiicliTallyand personallrroldrallm—Cedlo nib-Fold ITid/ol'a--ssiStEdi-vith-th-o-fall-fif b-iiiiiterislin (non-settled personal tgryry lawsuits? MR. PIKE: Before you answer that question, Madame Court Reporter, will you please read that question back to me? (Pending question was read.) MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question without divulging attorney/client or work product information, you may answer that question. MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. THE WITNESS:-risaiiiTalicrudib-bWald. going to assert attomey/ai wile-li -fo (the answer, I'm afraid, but NI like to answer that question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. lio you have howled e of any evideTe (hTdicTatin--g-thilBrildley ever reached agreements 0-5-share attomey's fees with—ifori-lau—yrrs? MR. PIKE: I'm sorry. Mr. Scarola, can you tell me what page of the Complaint you're referring to, if you are? " \ preMR. SCAROLA: I'm not referring to any page of Complaint, although I will tell you that that cise allegation is made in the Complaint. + +1 Page 85 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE WITNESS:(rfa,"Mi:Scrrola,--w—ehWe abpoenaed-Mr:Edwards documents and-documents (from hits firm tliaf 1 Rlie7ilITiTftglivme ( more specificity with answers ffthat question. (1YrilakinTforvrardlcittinTthr-thit 01x-TcifireVideWerWith - respect to what we (currently know, sitting hertodayr, pinfoltdicatelfgoihitolfaVito-blaim my cattorney/elientiTriCiilers. (23y MR7SCARDLTA: (9) (Do you toda have an evidence to support an assertioTitha ever usedinvestor money (to payL.M.7E.W., and/or Jane Da-IV-front money, such (tfialthey would-lifus—itErgettlrob-ril-attioiTs? MR. PIKE: Same instruction. THE WITNESS: You'll have to get I need to hear the first part of the question. Do I have any evidence? Do I have knowledge of evidence? I'm sorry. What was the — BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence to support that assertion? MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question without violating attorney/client, work product, please do so. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. + 2 THE WITNESS: "I'm going to have to assert the + 3 [attorney/client privilege, I'm afraid, though I'd + 4 (like to answer that question as well, sir. + 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 Q. (Do you have any evidence to support the + 7 [redacted] conducted searches, wire + 8 (taps or intercepted conversations in violation of State + 9 or Federal laws and Bar rules? + 10 A. (Your question, once again, asked did Mr. - + 11 was Mr. Edwards personally involved in the + 12 eavesdropping? Did he walk to someone's house and sort + 13 of put a bug in their house? Did he, personally, stand + 14 outside? + 15 (The question is, did Mr. Edwards' firm engage + 16 in this behavior in an attempt to defraud local + 17 investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. attorney + 18 has filed a Complaint saying that they did. The + 19 Complaints filed by Scherer saying that his firm did. + 20 (The Scherer Complaint says my name and the + 21 boxes of files that we've subpoenaed used my name, sir. + 22 (We have requested information, but up until + 23 today have not received any. + 24 (To give you a more specific answer, I'm afraid + 25 I cannot. + +1 To the extent you can answer the question + 2 without disclosing attorney/client or work product + 3 information, do so. + 4 (THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer + 5 with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South + 6 Florida's history engaged in by Mr. Edwards' firm + 7 and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, + 8 probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, + 9 not only illegal wire taps and eavesdropping, but + 10 an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe + 11 speaks for itself. + 12 (Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. Edwards + 13 today, I'm going to have to assert the + 14 attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 16 Q. (Is it your contention that Mr. Scherer's + 17 Complaint even contains the name [redacted]? + 18 (A) (I don't recall, sir. + 19 Q. Did sexual assaults ever take place on a + 20 private airplane on which you were a passenger? + 21 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + 22 THE WITNESS: At least -- I would like to + 23 answer each and every one of your questions here + 24 today, Mr. Scarola. But at least today, I'm going + 25 do have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +1 Q. (Do you have knowledge of any evidence that + 2 [redacted] ever conducted searches, wire taps or + 3 (intercepted conversations in violation of State or + 4 (Federal laws and Bar rules? + 5 MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + 6 THE WITNESS: (The newspapers and the U.S. + 7 (Attorney's Complaint widely reported that + 8 (Mr. [redacted] firm and people hired by his firm, + 9 (investigators hired by his firm fraudulently + 10 (representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in + 11 (just those activities, sir. + 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 13 Q. (Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that + 14 (Bradley Edwards was ever aware of any such activities? + 15 A. (I'm going to have to -- + 16 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + 17 THE WITNESS: -- assert the attorney/client, + 18 (privilege to that, sir. + 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 20 Q. (Do you have any knowledge that [redacted] + 21 (ever participated in or was aware of actions that + 22 (utilized the judicial process, including, but not + 23 (limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for, + 24 (the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + 25 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +1 Amendment Rights as provided by the U.S. + 2 Constitution. + 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 4 Q. Does a flight log kept for a private jet used + 5 by you contain the names of celebrities, dignitaries or + 6 International figures? + 7 A. At least today, sir, I'm going to have to + 8 respectfully decline to answer based on my Fifth, Sixth + 9 and 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer that + 10 question. + 11 Q. Have you ever had a personal relationship with + 12 Donald Trump? + 13 A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," + 14 sir? + 15 Q. Have you socialized with him? + 16 A. Yes, sir. + 17 Q. Yes? + 18 A. Yes, sir. + 19 Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in + 20 the presence of females under the age of 18? + 21 A. Though I'd like to answer that question, at + 22 least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth + 23 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + 24 Q. Have you socialized with Alan Dershowitz? + 25 A. Yes, sir. He's my attorney, as well as a + +1 friend. +2 Q. (Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz +3 in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +4 (MR. PIKE: Form. +5 (THE WITNESS: Sir, at least here today, I'm +6 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth +7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights. + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: +9 Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola? +10 A. This is the type of questions where people who +11 have nothing to do with this case whatsoever have been +12 brought into the case by Mr. [REDACTED] in an attempt to +13 simply imperil my relationships with social friends and +14 serves as an example of why this case has been brought +15 against Mr. [REDACTED] and his firm, sir. +16 MR. PIKE: Form as well. +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Well, do you know who brought those persons' +19 names into this lawsuit? +20 (MR. PIKE: Form. +21 (And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I +22 believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus +23 (RRA? +24 (BY MR. SCAROLA: +25 (Q. Yes, sir, that's the lawsuit I'm talking + +1 about. The one in which your deposition is being taken +2 today. +3 Do you know who brought those persons' names +4 into this lawsuit? + +5 A. As a reaction, and only as a reaction to total +6 misbehavior on Mr. [REDACTED] part, and the Complaint was +7 obviously written by my attorneys, sir. + +8 Q. So you know that those names are in your +9 Complaint, right? + +10 A. Yes, sir. +11 Q. Okay. So because those names are in your +12 Complaint, I'm asking you about the people you named. + +13 Have you had a social relationship with Tommy +14 Mottola? + +15 A. The names in my Complaint are strictly as a +16 reaction to the abusive discovery process by +17 Mr. [REDACTED] his partners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in +18 jail, in an attempt to imperil my friendships. + +19 But, yes, I have socialized with Mr. Mottola. +20 Q. Have you ever socialized with Mr. Mottola in +21 the presence of females under the age of 18? + +22 MR. PIKE: Form. +23 THE WITNESS: At least today, the typical to +24 the [REDACTED] contention of bringing cases of a +25 malicious nature where his partner sits in jail for + +1 (this -- just this type of behavior, the answer is, +2 today, at least, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth and +3 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer +4 each and every one of your questions, Mr. Scarola. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: +6 Q. Have you had a social relationship with David +7 Copperfield? +8 A. As a reaction to, once again, the abusive +9 discovery process of bringing in names of people that +10 have absolutely nothing to do with any of Mr. [REDACTED], +11 Mr. Rothstein's or their clients' claims, by bringing in +12 the names of friends of mine strictly in an attempt to +13 stress my relationships, imperil my business +14 relationships, I'm going to say, yes, I do know +15 Mr. Copperfield. + +16 Q. (Have you ever socialized with David +17 (Copperfield? +18 (A. Again, as -- +19 (MR. PIKE: Form. +20 (THE WITNESS: Sorry, +21 (It's a typical Edwards/Rothstein strategy of +22 trying to involve well-known people in maliciously +23 fabricated cases in order to fleece investors out +24 of millions of dollars. They brought up names in +25 attempts at abuse of discovery process to try and + +1 (take discovery of people who have nothing to do +2 with this case. +3 (Did I socialize with David Copperfield? The +4 answer is, yes. + +5 (BY MR. SCAROLA: +6 Q. Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield +7 in the presence of females under the age of 18? +8 (A. I'm sure, again, this question is a typical +9 question of Mr. Edwards/Rothstein scheme to defraud +10 investors, asking questions knowing it serves no purpose +11 or relationship relevance to their case whatsoever. +12 (At least today, though I'd like to answer that +13 question, on advice of my Counsel, and only on advice of +14 my Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth +15 and 14th Amendment Right. +16 (MR. PIKE: Form as well. +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. (Have you ever had a social relationship with +19 Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico and formerly +20 (U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United +21 Nations? +22 (MR. PIKE: Form. +23 (THE WITNESS: As is typical of the Edwards +24 scheme, along with his partner, Scott Rothstein, +25 who sits in jail, what they attempted to do was + +1 (bring in any celebrity I might have known, +2 well-known people, in an attempt to strictly +3 imperil my relationships with these people where +4 these people have no bearing whatsoever on any of +5 their claims or cases. + +6 (Yes, I do have a social relationship. + +7 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +8 (Q. (Have you ever socialized with Mr. +9 (in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +10 (MR. PIKE: Form. + +11 (THE WITNESS: Again, typical of the +12 (Edwards/Rothstein scheme of bringing in well-known + +13 (people, asking them ridiculous questions) +14 (ridiculous questions in an attempt strictly to +15 (imperil my relationships with these people where +16 (they have absolutely nothing to do with anything to +17 (do with Edwards, Rothstein or any of their alleged +18 (victims, the answer to your question is, yes, I +19 (have socialized. + +20 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 (Q. (Yes, but that wasn't my question) +22 (My question was: Have you ever socialized +23 (with Mr. Richards in the presence of females under the +24 (age of 18? + +25 (MR. PIKE: Form. + +1 THE WITNESS: In response to your question, +2 again, my full answer was, typical of the +3 (Rothstein scheme to ask questions of a +4 sexual charged nature, crafted cases, the U.S. +5 Attorney has called his firm the largest fraud in +6 U.S. history, fleecing investors out of millions of +7 dollars by engaging in just these types of +8 questions. Though I would like to answer each and +9 every question about every one of these people, on +10 advice of my Counsel today, I must take -- assert +11 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th +12 Amendment Right. Though I'd prefer to answer the +13 question, I was told that if I choose to do so, I +14 risk losing their representation, sir. + +15 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +16 (Q. Have you ever sexually abused children? + +17 (MR. PIKE: Form. + +18 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, and only +19 upon advice of Counsel, though I'd like to answer +20 that question, as well as every other one of your +21 claims brought by Mr. ( and his partner, who +22 currently sits in jail, sir, I would like to answer +23 those questions. But today at least, I have to +24 assert my Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth +25 Amendment Right. Though I'd prefer to answer the + +1 (question, I'm told by my Counsel that if I choose +2 to do so, which is my preference, I risk losing +3 their representation. + +4 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + +5 (Q. (How many children have you sexually abused? + +6 (MR. PIKE: Form. + +7 (And I just want to be clear on the record. + +8 (These types of questions are argumentative and +9 (harassing. And, moreover, it's my contention that +10 these types of questions are not related to this +11 (lawsuit by any stretch of the imagination. In this +12 (deposition, while I've been liberal in allowing +13 these questions, are being utilized in an attempt +14 to provoke a waiver of the Fifth Amendment Right. + +15 There has been an Order entered by, I believe, +16 Judge Hafele regarding these types of questions. + +17 So with that caution, Mr. Scarola, I would ask +18 you that you refrain from asking abusive and +19 harassing questions that are not relevant to this +20 case. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Well, it's very interesting that +22 you claim they're not relevant when they are +23 directly taken from the allegations in your +24 Complaint. + +25 And I agree with you that they are not + +1 relevant because there is no basis whatsoever for +2 this claim against Mr. ( But since you've +3 made these baseless allegations, I am obliged to +4 pursue the allegations by asking these questions. + +5 So we'll move on from there. And whenever you +6 think it's appropriate to terminate this deposition +7 because you believe that I've acted +8 inappropriately, be my guest. + +9 MR. PIKE: I appreciate your invitation, +10 Mr. Scarola. + +11 I'm going to move to strike. + +12 The fact is, Mr. Scarola, is that, these types +13 of questions have already been ruled upon as being +14 argumentative and harassing. + +15 If you want to direct some questions relevant +16 to your lawsuit, I invite you to do so. But +17 attempting to use this deposition process as a +18 mechanism to provoke a waiver of the Fifth +19 Amendment and to obtain information that is more or +20 potentially more relevant to Mr. ( cases in +21 which he is lead Counsel on, I think is improper. + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +23 Q. Did you have staff members that assisted you +24 in scheduling appointments with underage females; that +25 is, females under the age of 18? + +1 Q. What day are you prepared to answer all these 2 questions? 3 MR. PIKE: Form. Attorney/client and work 4 product. 5 THE WITNESS: That's attorney — I wish I 6 could answer that question as well, but it's 7 attorney/client privilege, sir. 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 Q. Your Complaint says that: "Rather than 10 evaluating and resolving the cases based on the merits," 11 open patens, "i.e., facts," close parens, "which 12 included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions 13 by each of the claimants," et cetera. 14 Who are the claimants that are referenced 15 there? 16 A. It's — I'm sorry. You have to repeat the 17 question. 18 Q. Yes, sir. Your Complaint says,: — 19 MR. PIKE: Page? 20 Q. "rather than evaluating" — 21 MR. PIKE: Can you give me a page, sir? 22 MR. SCAROLA: Page 27, paragraph 49, second 23 sentence. 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 25 Q. Quote, "rather than evaluating and resolving + +1 the cases based on the merits, that is, facts which 2 included knowledgeable, voluntary and conse 3 by each of the claimants." 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Who are the claimants that you're 6 there? 7 A. Theyre the prostitutes you refers to jh the 8 past, sir. 9 Q. What are their names? 10 A. I think the prostitutes' nitrites were — the 11 prostitute that you deseitibed before was L.M. 12 With respect to the others, I'm ping to have 13 to claim the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. 14 Q. So one of the individuals that you're 15 refereneingliale is L.M.; is that correct? 16 A. It's-- fife Individual I've referenced is a 17 person who flied a claim against me. 18 Q. Is it L.M.? 19 A. It is L.M., as far as I Imow from the claim, 20 sir. 21 Q. Okay. So one of the people that you're 22 referring to is L.M., who you've identified as L.M.; is 23 that correct? 24 A. With respect to that question, sir, on advice 25 of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 and 14th Amendment. Q. What are the voluntary and consensual actions by L.M. that you are referencing there? A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each one of your questions here today, fm going to have to respectfully decline based on advice of my Counsel, and have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. Q. (What are the damages that you claim to have suffered as a consequence of any wrongdoing on theThiart MR. PIKE: Form. (THE—WITNESS:7Th° cost ofildiculous litigation, of having my attorneys prepare responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various (kration ninimum, sli) BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Which lawyer! A. (Burman ritton,leek Goldberger, and a bunch arthe others, sir Q. (Whichonest(Name them for me, please) A. Spec' cally — have so man lawyers de ding me here against Mr. I con'ail (here — at the moment I can't recall it with` ci) 'tep. (You don't remember any of your lawyers' names? + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. A. Lth71-clin Q. (BesidesMr. -- besides the Burman Critton an irr.:Goldberger?/ ATAre you askingme for the firm, sir, or are Foraskini\_na games?, --747(1 want as much information as you can give me! (bout this element of damage which you claim;aa l:,—ih—at 61, the cost of legal services that you claim to be (damages in this—ZO. A. (sica.7 MR. PIKE: Form. And move to stripe. (THE WITNESS; ah . Roy Black BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. (Okay. Who else? A. (Mi. Marty Weinbei av .Alan Dershcoviik' al rliTiLl-fkowitz. The finn of Burman Crittortier. (That's it for the rnnu nent. Q. (How much have you paid the law firm of Burman (Critton and Luttier which you claim is damage! A. (Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir) Q7Hovrnuch? A. (I don't have that figure offhand) Q. (Can you give us any better figure than hundreds of thousands of dollars?) E) (No, not sittinghere today:, + +1 Q. (Are you paying them on an hourly basis? + 2 (A. Yes, sir. + 3 Q. What is the hourly rate at which you are + 4 (compensating members of the law firm? + 5 (A. They're ordinary rates. + 6 Q. (What are they? + 7 (A. I don't know. + 8 Q. How much have you paid Mr. Goldberger? + 9 (A. I'm not aware total amount, sir. + 10 Q. (What is the hourly rate at which you're paying + 11 (Mr. Goldberger? + 12 (A. His normal hourly rate. + 13 Q. How much is that? + 14 (A. I don't know. + 15 Q. How much have you paid Mr. Black which you + 16 (claim as damages in this case? + 17 (A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + 18 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + 19 (A. I believe so. + 20 Q. (What is the hourly rate? + 21 (A. I'm not -- I do not know, sir. + 22 Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? + 23 (A. (I don't know the exact amount, sir. + 24 Q. What's your best estimate? + 25 (A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. + +1 (A. (I don't know. + 2 Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? + 3 (A. (I would guess so. + 4 Q. Who? + 5 (A. I don't know. + 6 MR. PIKE: Form. + 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 8 Q. Who are the people who are authorized to make + 9 payment on your behalf? + 10 A. With respect to that question, I'm going to + 11 have to assert the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + 12 Q. (Are there any other elements of damage, apart + 13 (from the money paid to lawyers? + 14 (A. Yes, sir. + 15 Q. (What? + 16 (A. The stress and emotional damage of imperiling + 17 (my friendships and business relationships with no + 18 (relevance whatsoever to these cases, brought by a firm + 19 (that whose partner sits in a Federal prison, who engaged + 20 (in discovery to harass my friends and social contacts + 21 (with no consideration or relevance to this case + 22 (whatsoever, in an attempt to simply fleece -- partly + 23 (fleece investors in South Florida out of millions of + 24 (dollars, sir. + 25 (Q. (What is the value of those losses? + +1 Q. (Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + 2 (A. I believe so. + 3 Q. What's the hourly rate? + 4 (A. I don't know, sir. + 5 Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? + 6 (A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + 7 Q. (Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + 8 (A. I believe so. + 9 Q. At what hourly rate? + 10 (A. I don't know, sir. + 11 Q. How much are you paying Jay -- how much have + 12 (you paid Jay Lefkowitz? + 13 (A. I'm not sure, sir. + 14 Q. (Do you have any idea at all? + 15 (A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. + 16 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + 17 (A. Yes, sir. + 18 Q. What's the hourly rate? + 19 (A. I don't know. + 20 Q. (What is the form of payment to your lawyers? + 21 (How do you transfer money to them? + 22 (A. I don't know, sir. + 23 MR. PIKE: Form. + 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 25 Q. (Pardon me? + +1 (A. MR. PIKE: Form. + 2 THE WITNESS: (I'm not sure yet, sir. + 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 4 (Q. (Do you have any idea at all? + 5 (A. Not sitting here today. + 6 (Q. (More or less than \$10? + 7 MR. PIKE: Form. + 8 (THE WITNESS: I would guess it's more than + 9 (\$10, sir. + 10 (BY MR. SCAROLA: + 11 Q. More or less than a hundred? + 12 A. (I would guess it's quite an amount of money. + 13 (Q. (Is it more or less than a hundred? + 14 (A. Yes, sir. + 15 Q. More or less than a thousand? + 16 (A. I would say it's more than 150,000. + 17 Q. More or less than a million? + 18 (A. I don't know, sir. + 19 Q. (So somewhere between 150,000 and a million? + 20 (A. No, sir. It's not -- + 21 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the + 22 witness' testimony. + 23 (THE WITNESS: No, sir. That's not what I + 24 (said, I said, I did not know. + 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. Maybe more than a million? + 2 (A. Yee) + 3 (Q. More or less than a billion? + 4 MR. PIKE: Form. + 5 (THE WITNESS: I don't know) + 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 7 Q. Maybe more than a billion? + 8 (A. Maybe more) + 9 Q. How are you going to go about finding out what + 10 (the value of that loss is?) + 11 MR. PIKE: Attorney/client, work product. + 12 To the extent you can answer without + 13 disclosing our conversations or the conversations + 14 with your other attorneys that you've delineated, + 15 you can do so. + 16 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 17 Q. Or you can just take the signal and say, I + 18 refuse to answer because it's attorney/client privilege. + 19 A. I resent that. + 20 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. + 21 THE WITNESS: But it's okay. You can continue + 22 to try to harass me, sir. It doesn't work. The + 23 ladies and gentlemen of the jury, hopefully when + 24 they see the deposition will recognize and see + 25 these pile of tricks. The answer -- + +1 (1) BY MR. SCAROLA: + 2 (2) Q. Do you attribute all of the damages that you + 3 have described to Mr. [REDACTED] conduct? + 4 MR. PIKE: Form. + 5 THE WITNESS: As a participant -- I don't know + 6 how to proportion the conduct as opposed to + 7 Mr. [REDACTED] and his partner who sits in jail. I + 8 guess the U.S. Attorney will also make a decision + 9 to how much the conduct and proportion is relevant + 10 to both damages and anything else he's done in this + 11 case, sir. + 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 13 Q. But I'm not asking you about what the U.S. + 14 Attorney's opinion is. + 15 I want to know whether you hold Mr. [REDACTED] + 16 responsible for all of those elements of damage that you + 17 have described to us. + 18 A. It's a difficult question to answer, + 19 Mr. Scarola. + 20 Q. No, it's easy. Yes, no, or I don't know. + 21 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, you know as well as I + 22 do, the witness is attempting to answer your + 23 question. + 24 MR. SCAROLA: I don't think so. I think he's + 25 attempting to evade all of my questions. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Hopefully they will. + 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. + 3 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. + 4 (THE WITNESS: I will respectfully decline to + 5 answer that) + 6 (BY MR. SCAROLA:) + 7 (Q) (On what basis?) + 8 (A. Attorney/client privilege) + 9 (MR. PIKE: And work product) + 10 (BY MR. SCAROLA:) + 11 (Q. Any other elements of damage?) + 12 (A. Not -- there might be, but sitting here today,) + 13 (I can't think of them.) + 14 (Q) (Do you have written contracts with any of your) + 15 (lawyers?) + 16 (A. I don't know.) + 17 (Q) (Who does?) + 18 (A. I don't know.) + 19 MR. SCAROLA: Let's take a short break. We + 20 may be finished. + 21 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now off the record at + 22 1:12 p.m. + 23 (Brief recess.) + 24 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on video record at + 25 1:18 p.m. + +1 MR. PIKE: And I understand your contention. + 2 However, if you would, allow Mr. Epstein to finish + 3 his response. + 4 (4) THE WITNESS: Could you repeat your question? + 5 (5) BY MR. SCAROLA: + 6 (6) Q. Do you hold Mr. [REDACTED] responsible for all of + 7 the damages that you have described? + 8 (8) MR. PIKE: Form. + 9 (9) THE WITNESS: It's difficult for me to + 10 proportion the damages that I have described + 11 between Mr. [REDACTED] his partner, who is currently + 12 in jail, his -- the other people named in the + 13 Complaint. Hopefully a jury will do that. + 14 (14) BY MR. SCAROLA: + 15 (15) Q. Do you hold L.M. responsible for all of the + 16 damages you have described? + 17 MR. PIKE: Form. + 18 THE WITNESS: Again, these questions, these + 19 ambiguous questions, as opposed to who + 20 participated, I would let Mr. [REDACTED] and his + 21 clients and his partners decide whose proportionate + 22 responsibility it is, sir. + 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: + 24 Q. So you defer to them? + 25 MR. PIKE: Form. + +**APP. 33** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually. J individually, and L.M., individually, + +< 94S) + +Defendants, + +COMES NOW the Counter-Amended Exhibit List as follows: RADLEY J. M=. and hereby files his + +- O. No objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All object' a e t authenticity +- 3. IrreleGiDtt aterial +- 4. Probatlye value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +O SA + +## T LIST + +#### OBJECTIONS + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Amended Exhibit List + +| | Counter-Plaintiff | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit | +| | Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes. | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes. | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles. Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners". | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. | +| 7. | Messages taken from messagepads found at Epstein's home. | +| 8 | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by | +| | Alfredo Rodriguez. ,- | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein's flight log,t. | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein'S phone records. | +| 11. | Sarah Kelten's phone records. | +| 12. | JailliVisftati ion Logs. | +| 13. | -"I‘effrny Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 16 | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed. | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, and L.M.. Case No.: 502009C M0 IXI RCXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, .1 Amended Exhibit List + +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection ' Evidence Identification | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 18 | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and | +| | any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets. O S' | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey E | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High I Book. | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach Year Book. | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach G ens School Year Book. | +| 27. | Affidavit and lication for Search Warrant on | +| | Notepa s nd in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or | +| | d ' g h lls outside of his home during criminal | +| | i tiga' on. | +| 29. | e alm Beach State Attomey's Criminal file against | +| | J rey Epstein. | +| 30 | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009.10t0CMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | | | | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and I....M.. Case No.: 50200911.O.00XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, JEER Amended Exhibit List + +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection le Evidence Identification | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 40 | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | +| 42 | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, toNand | +| | planes. :0 | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared agc ffri | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter fromIUS Attorney's | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Victim. | +| 48 | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated | +| 50. | \>114/ Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 ray tX CMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection Evidence Identification | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto | +| | regarding house island project. e ic | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-3 | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy ta n -08. | +| 59. | Massage Table. | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62 | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | +| 63. | JeffregtpstNt's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | +| 64. | 71,efffey Epstein's Booking photograph. | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts. | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 5020091.0/.1MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, .1 Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|---------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | | | | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler. | | | | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-11-06. | | | | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13-06. | | | | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 2-17-06. | | | | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06. | | | | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-10-06. | | | | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06. | | | | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. | | | | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for [REDACTED] | | | | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents. | | | | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties. | | | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of [REDACTED] | | | | +| 81. | Police report regarding [REDACTED] picking up money dated 11-28-04. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009a91O0.1111MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| .Jeffrey Epstein Case No. No. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. 502009CA040800XXX X MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Amended Exhibit List Counter-Plaintiff Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. Aii Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06. Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. C c\ Flight information for | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beac 005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notep d not 'a. | +| 92. | Pleadings of J oe 1 and 2 v. US case. | +| 93. | Jeffrey E in 5 endment Speech. | +| 94. | Rei er Krisher dated 5-1-06. | +| 95. | Police Report dated 11-28-04. | +| 96. | tim's school records and transcripts. | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter dated 7-9-08. | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home. | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. Case No.: 502009CA040g0 MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List and L.M.. + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------|----------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists. | | | | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | | | | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey. | | | | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto. | | | | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause. | | | | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits. | | | | +| 109. | [REDACTED] reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits. | | | | +| 110. | [REDACTED] reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 5020091110 rBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, [REDACTED] is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | | | | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to [REDACTED] objections. | | | | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by [REDACTED] on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | | | | +| 114. | [REDACTED] Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto and all Undisputed Facts. | | | | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | | | | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | | | | +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | | | | +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | | | | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | | | | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 121. | Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009Q1120=414. MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------|----------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | In Evidence | Identification | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | | | | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case. | | | | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | | | | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017. | | | | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009. | | | | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013. | | | | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013. | | | | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012. | | | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | | | | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile. | | | | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 50200911.0.011111MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, I and L.M. | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection If Evidence Identification | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 133. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or | +| 135. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 136. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 137. | Any documents or other exhibit attach during | +| 138. | Any and all exhibits, documen t . rred to in any | +| 139. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties | +| 140. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | +| 142. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFY + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009Calif0g2MOMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Semis, Esquire \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com; Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. ScottalinIcrocklaw.com Rara l inkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester = Esq wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawass 250 S Australian Avenu uite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33 Phone: (561)-65:601c m Fax: (561)-835- Attorneys fo + +Go + +Jack A er, Esquire jgoldbe gwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury oldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiffs, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP. 34** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S 0 TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S AMEND EXHIBIT LIST + +PlaintifVCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Ed the following Objections to nded Exhibit List dated November 9, 2017: + +#### LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS: + +I — All Objections 2 — All Objections except Auth tici 3 - Relevance 4 — Probative value subs misleading the jury, r n 5 — Privileged k 6 - Opinion 7 — Hearsa 8 — Authe 9 — O e identify basis of objection) 10 — Com teness 11 — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Counsel for Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper exhibit 14 — Trade secrets/Confidential outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, presentation of cumulative evidence + +| No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. | All applicable criminal statutes All applicable Florida Statutes Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" Non-Prosecution Agreement Jane Doe 102 Complaint Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections 3,4, 7, 11, 12 3,4, 7, 11, 12 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 3, 4, 7, 8 '0 3 3, ,7, 8, 11,14 | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced b home Rodriguez | 14 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 \ | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | +| 11. | phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 14 | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstcin's probati le | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 14. | All probable cause a avi investigation ofJeffrexptein | ated to criminal 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 15. | Victims' state i ents to t e FBI related to criminal | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| | investigation o lif y Epstein | | +| 16. | Video of Search executed \. | arrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being 3, 4, 8 | +| 17. | Ap 'on 1rN C:5 t Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent ded Complaints | Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | +| 19. | II records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 24. | 2002 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 25. | 2001 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a plaintiff or defendant | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13. This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and | | +| | | cars boats) | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein | | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | | +| | | 3, , 8, 10 | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Off | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Vic ' | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident | | +| 49. | All reports and documentation gen ffiti aim Beach | | +| | Police Department related to Je sto n | | +| | All Witness Statements gene b m Beach Police | | +| | Department relating to Je y | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of stein's aircraft and | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for fl is ken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, II, 12 | +| 53. | Letter from Je to Alberto Pinto regarding | | +| | house isla d .r. : t | | +| 54. | Jeffrey : 41 I .ank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 55. | Jere' s 's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 56. | ails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, | | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | +| 59. | Massage Table | 3, 4, 12 (document | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community | | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, Document says | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL | | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3 , 2 (document | +| | | of cription) | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | , 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischl | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (document | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assista | omey dated | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | ' to Attorney dated | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronsti o | nt State Attorney dated | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fro tint | istant State Attorney dated | +| 74. | Letter from G nstin to Assistant State Attorney dated | | +| 75. | Letter Gol erger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 76. | AI | | +| | e issued to State Grand Jury | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 77. | b i 111 | | +| | is related to the rental of a vehicle for | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| 81. | Police report regarding | picking up money 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 14 | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4 0, 11 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | i 3 , 7, 10, I1 | +| 89. | Flight information for | 3, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, I 1 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.maria | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US cases \ , | 3, 4, 12 (document | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 51h Amendment S | 'l\ 3, 4, 12 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 95. | Police | 11-28-04 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 96. | Victim's school rec ds an | nscripts 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification le dated 7-9-08 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 98. | Police report of ar Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 99. | Victi s edica Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 100. Al su | conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey | | +| | ' ' home | | +| 1 | 'Is received from Palm Beach Records related to | | +| 103. All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 104. Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 109. reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not ibit | +| 110. reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his | N 'bit | +| 111. By listing an Exhibit, | is not waiving his right to No exhibit | +| 112. All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to | Not an exhibit | +| 113. All pleadings and attachments in the actio | a | +| Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted b | I wards | +| on behalf of victims of Epstein's crim | lestations. | +| 114. Motions for Summary J | I attachments 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 115. All time records and hourly | ' d mentation | +| 116. All deposition testimo | overy responses by | +| Epstein submitted in | is a t n. | +| 117. All pleadings filed b | in in the Rothstein bankruptcy | +| 118. All submissio | in connection with the | +| Rothste' cposi ' n. | | +| hi I molestations. | | +| 120. rnal taken from Epstein's home and produced to | | +| 121 oto depicting | Ghislaine Maxwell and 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 122. All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 124. Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 126. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| 127. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim Jan | 9 2013 | +| 128. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| Answer an Affirmative | to Defendant/Counter | +| Plaintiff | Fourth Amended | +| 129. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and O 14C ' ' | +| | 3, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 131. Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | 's | +| 132. New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey E | a | +| 133. Any and all responses to Subpoenas | with or | +| 134. All Interrogatories and | to, Requests to | +| Produce and Responses | or Admissions and | +| 135. Any and all docume | pro ced in this action. 12 | +| 136. Any and all de | tions taken in this action. 12 (document provided is | +| 137. Any d 4" nts or other exhibit attached to or used during | | +| an d • iti n in this action | | +| 1 314 and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any | | +| 140. Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | 12 (document provided is | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action | 12 (document provided is not reflective of description), 13 | +| 142. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action | 12 (document provided is not reflective of description), 13 | + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the atto Service List below on November 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). ed on the t to Florida + +> LINK & ROCKEN 1555 Palm Beac West Palm B (561) 727- C Boulevard, Suite 301 da 33401 727-3601 [fax] + +By./ + +Link (FBN 602991) erard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) gela M. Many (FBN 26680) rimary: Scott@linIcrocIdaw.com Primary: Kara(41inkrocklaw.com Primary: Angelaelinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tinaelinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: TanyaQiinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: EserviceOlinIcrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +**APP.35** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800MaMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +Cos + +#### SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. ED 1l5, and through his undersigned attorneys, + +hereby supplements his list of witnesses trial follows: + +## WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED + +- 1. Bradley J. Ed 2.. Jeffrey E +- 3. o tephenson + - W. Peachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 +- 4. do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 +- 5. Guiffre do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800000CMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 2 of 22 + +- 6. +- 7. +- 8. +- 9. IIIMguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York 10016 do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York, 10016 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449 do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, S 700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 10. Robert C. Jose Podhurst Orsec One S.E. rd Aven Suite 2700 Miami, FL +- 11. +12. Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Dikieti Joseph Recarey ch Police Department uth County Road Beach, FL 33480 +- 13. Johncmolly do = & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020 + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. Page 3 of 22 + +- 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 16. Antonio Figueroa (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida +- 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Police DepartMent 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 18. Records Custodian of United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida +- 19. Records Custodian of the Federal Bureau of Investigations +- 20. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 21. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 1 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 'Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 22."r Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 117th Floor New York, NY 10017 +- 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 4 of 22 + +24. Isidro M. [REDACTED], Esquire +[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A. +224 Datura Street, Suite 900 +West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 + +25. Earleen Cote, Esquire +Kubicki Draper +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. +c/o Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +27. William Berger, Esquire +Weiss, Handler, Cornwell, P.A. +2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A +Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +**WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES** + +28. + +[REDACTED] + +29. Landon Thomas +c/o New York Times +620 Eighth Avenue +New York, NY 10018 + +30. Oren Kramer +c/o Boston Provident, L.P. +717 5th Avenue #12A +New York, NY 10022 + +31. Lawrence LaVecchio +United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida +Broward Financial Center +Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 5 of 22 + +32. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +33. + +Evgenia Ignatieva + +1650 Broadway, #910 + +New York, NY 10019 + +34. + +[REDACTED] + +35. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +36. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Jack Scarola + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +37. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 + +Miami, FL 33131 + +38. + +Brandy Brenson + +c/o Spencer Kuvin + +1800 South Australian Ave #400 + +West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +39. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 + +Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CAG40800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +41. William Scherer, Esquire 633 S Federal Hwy #800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +CO 42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 + +43. c/o Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suit\ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +S\4 ' ):49 + +44. + +45. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +46. co oert . Josefsberg, Esq. 7 " -Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +47. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 7 of 22 + +- 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edwards Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW1A 1 AA +- 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown +- 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 +- 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, F 934gt a mir St +- 53. +- 54. do Adam Horo Horowitz 425 North Fort --uderilale FL 33301 Avenue, Suite 2 o rt Josefsberg, Esq. A711\ urst Orseck, PA e S.E. rAvenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 8 of 22 + +- 56. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 57. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480 +- 59. +- 60. c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131 do Robert C. Jopt6fsbeti Esq. Podhurst Orsec One S.E. akdsirnu e , Suite 2700 Miami, FL 131 +- 61. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave 4400 est Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 +- 62. do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128 +- 63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW 2s AVE., Miami, FL 33169 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 9 of 22 + +- 64. +- 65. +- 66. +- 67. +- 68. Esq. Po Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 = Esq. Pottinger LLC 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law ?s, 425 North Andrews \*fte 2 Fort Lauderdale do Adam Horowitz 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 F uderdale FL 33301 69., Kurkendall eral Bureau of Investigation 6320 NW rd Ave. Miami, FL 33169 +- 70. do Isidro M. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 + +J. + +COSA + +Case No.: S02009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 10 of 22 + +71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown + +72. Address Currently Unknown + +73. 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021 + +OS A + +74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 C.) Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +may ) + +425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 75. Matt Weissing Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, # West Palm Beach, FL 3 + +77. Any additional ind Office and who supplied as it rel entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA. + +irni Parkway 78. Leslie We us, Ohio 43206 + +A\...\ 79. 2 ent Donald J. Trump •Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 + +80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401 + +81. Maritza Vasquez 1293 SW 21' Terrace Miami, FL 33145 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 11 of 22 + +82. Maximilia [REDACTED] +c/o William Unroch, Esquire +140 West End, Apt. 30-BW +New York, NY 10023 + +83. [REDACTED] +c/o Spencer Kuvin +1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +84. [REDACTED] +2915 Share Rd. 111 +Tallahassee, FL 31312 + +85. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin) +11675 Glowing Sunset Lane +Las Vegas, NV 89135 + +87. [REDACTED] + +88. Michael Fisten +Weston, FL + +89. [REDACTED] Adler +Delray Beach, FL + +90. [REDACTED] Alessi +6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. +Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +91. Janusz Banasiak +358 El Brillo Way +Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +- 96. Rosalie 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 +- 97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently +- 98. +- 99. V 1.11.1 nknown, South Africa +- 100. Dubin 040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137 +- 101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206 +- 102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road +- 92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480 +- 93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472 +- 94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 +- 95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane S) West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942 ,' + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page I2 of 22 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page I.3 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +- 103. Officer Minot Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +- 104. Sgt. Sorge Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +- 105. Address Currently Unknown + +- 106. Joseph Pagnano iS 4/) 9 1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +- 107. Stephan Kosslyn 28 Garfield Street Cambridge, MA 0213 + +- 108. Cecile Dejongh ( A" 23 8 Estate Mafolieoy St. Thomas VI 008 + +- 109. Tommy Mottola 302 Caribbean Road Clint Beach, FL 33480-3012 + +- il +- 110. ike Sanka 49 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 + +- 112. William "Bill" 5645 Coral Ridge Drive II 391 Coral Springs, FL 33076 + +A44. + +CO + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 14 of 22 + +- 113. Howard Rubenstein 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 +- 114. Robert Meister 101 Seminole Ave. Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 115. Todd Meister 101 Seminole Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 116. President William J. Clinton +- 117. William Hammond 2965 Fontana Place Palm Beach, FL +- 118. Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, #250 West Palm Beach, Flori +- 119. Michele Pagan Palm Beach Pol. 345 South Count Road Palm Bea ent +- 120. Michele Da son Palm Beach Police Department 45 South County Road a Beach, FL 33480 my Fortimer 12309 North Old Country Road Wellington, FL 33414 + +122. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 15 of 22 + +123. + +[REDACTED] + +124. + +[REDACTED] + +125. + +[REDACTED] + +126. Latasha Lowe +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +127. + +[REDACTED] + +128. Zack Bryan +1150 Larch Way +Wellington, Florida + +129. + +[REDACTED] + +130. Larry Morrison +11148 Cobblefield Dr.. +Wellington, FL 33449 + +131. Story Cowles +801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +132. Michael Dawson +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Page 16 of 22 + +- 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134 +- 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101 +- 135. Sergia Cordero 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131 +- 136. Cassandra Rivera 5011 El Clam Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415 +- 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3 +- 138. +- 139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown +- 140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown +- 141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 +- 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown +- 143. Amazon Records Custodian +- 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Page 17 of 22 + +- 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +- 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +- 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL +- 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian 3344 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite C-124 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 C.) +- 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 150. Wellington Reginal Hospital Reco 10104 Forrest Wellington, FL 33414 6 s1\" Hill Blvd. +- 151. All witnesses that Defe n4cpasehaNisted on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff. +- 152. All rebuttal wi +- 153. All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +#### C\ WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION + +- 15 Epstein Vandam Street ew York, NY 10013 +- 155. +- 156. do Alan S. Ross, Esq. +- 157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-PlaiMiffM1 Page I8 of 22 + +> do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL + +- 158. Scott Rothstein c/o Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +- 159. Jeffrey Epstein + +- 160. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +#### EXPER + +- 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney amhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Cos + +The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di y athe prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +- 16 ert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orsecic, PA One S.E. 31.° Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 19 of 22 + +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Cohen Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 167. I idro M. Garcia, Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 Kubicki Draper +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire \ One East Broward Bouleva, S Sui 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 169. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A Boca Raton. 33431 + +Plaintiff reserves \*ght to amend this list. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 20 of 22 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 21 of 22 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. + +Page 22 of 22 + +J. M, Esquire + +staff efile@pathtojusticomn + +Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 A"\' CO 'S Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 5) ? ' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)467-1223 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +**APP.36** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +--- + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +January 25, 2012 + +9:34 a.m. - 10:03 a.m. + +SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach Florida 33409 + +Stenographically Reported By: +Tammy Nestor, RPR + +1 MR. KNIGHT: Okay. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: -- that's intended to coach 3 the witness, Mr. Knight. + +4 MR. KNIGHT: I'm going to object. + +5 6 7 8 9 MR. SCAROLA: So if you say you are -I, objecting on the basis that it calls ' a legal conclusion, that's fine. Anew AtIC4i would like the witness's answer unl i::...) are instructing him not to answe + +10 11 to answer. MR. KNIGHT: I'm tructing him not + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q Okay. j'Aliva ld you please answer the 14 question? + +15 A ICIvsorry Would you repeat it? + +16 17 Bradley 18 court action on behalf of LM? Q Yes, sir. Is it your contention that abusively prosecuted the federal + +0 20 (How?, + +(Yes sir ; A 19 + +21 A a 234-count federal + +22 (complaint in conjunction with his partner Scott) + +23 (Rothstein to enable his partners at RRA to defraud) 24 (south Florida investors of millions of dollars) + +25 (His partner Scott Rothstein and his partner) + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (Mr. Adler have -- excuse me,) Mr. (Rothstein has now in) (deposition admitted that they needed to file a complaint) to.- (show investors that there was real action,)(E) (Rothstein's words)(going on in federal court) Eigt (investors had not been able to find (filed complaint and) (had complained to Mr)(Rothstein that there was filed) (complaints two days,)(excµse me,) (the federal complaint for 234) (before Mr. filed + +9 Q (Were you ever served with\_ttleibmpligAtO + +10 (ID (Not to the best of my ecollection) + +11 Cti) (so one contention Mr + +12 13 (abusively prosecuted (behalf of LW with whith were never served,) + +14 correct? + +15 16 09 (in fact was notified that the case was,) + +17 t you were never served with the case,) + +18 + +19 QD (I was notified that the case was filed) + +20 RD (But you were never served with the case,) + +21 correct? + +22 g (Not to the best of my recollection) + +23 24 25 en Okay., (What damage did you incur as 40 (consequence of the filing of a complaint with which) (you were never served?) + +1 A [I(incurred many legal -- much legal fees\ 2 (rar y legal fees)(in fact)(to try to figure out 3 (all/ -- what was going on and,(in fact,(gettind 4 (prepared to defend the case though I(had not yeti 5 (been served. + +9 O (I don't recall) + +10 Q Did you, in fact, engage in any sexual 11 conduct with LM? 9 Y + +12 A I'm sorry S m sure -- the jury is 13 going to recogni th is simply meant to harass 14 me, and I'll j e t take the Fifth Amendment since 15 your clie , is trying to overturn my 16 prosecu on agreement. + +6 (Q (Were the allegations in the federal 7 (complaint on behalf of LM any different than the 8 (allegations in the state court case on behalf of LW?, + +'74Noi 17 How many times did you engage in sexual 18 onduct with LM? + +O 19 A I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth 20.& 1 Amendment right again, sir. + +21 Q Do you know who LM is? + +22 A Again I'm going to assert my right. + +23 MR. KNIGHT: We are going to go off the 24 record and take another break. + +25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 9:58. We \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57ba6e0b03868230aa3004317e0346d497ec1101 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236/EFTA02761236.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3340 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761236.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 87, + "chars": 230414, + "elapsed_seconds": 52.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 8", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 393.0797119140625, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 393.0797119140625, + 232.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 232.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 555.1651000976562, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 555.1651000976562, + 114.96209716796875 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 114.96209716796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION QF'WEFFREY EPSTEIN.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 503.5675048828125, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 503.5675048828125, + 325.34210205078125 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 325.34210205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 73.1702880859375 + ], + [ + 494.75799560546875, + 73.1702880859375 + ], + [ + 494.75799560546875, + 127.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 127.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.148, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.148, + 403.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 403.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.232, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 374.7850036621094, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 374.7850036621094, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 236.232, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 355.91131591796875, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 355.91131591796875, + 134.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 134.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S 0 TO DEFENDANT/ \nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S AMEND EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 508.2944030761719, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 508.2944030761719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 227.90005493164062, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 227.90005493164062, + 431.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 431.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 220.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 220.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 363.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 363.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 446.60302734375 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 446.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.808, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.808, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 435.7800000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C\\ \nWITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED \nBY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 465.96575927734375, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 465.96575927734375, + 534.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 534.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 392.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 392.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 103.68 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 307 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 321 + ], + [ + "Line", + 156 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 81 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 80 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 323 + ], + [ + "Line", + 135 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 290 + ], + [ + "Line", + 135 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 289 + ], + [ + "Line", + 112 + ], + [ + "Text", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 365 + ], + [ + "Line", + 160 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 366 + ], + [ + "Line", + 156 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 144 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761236" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f20a1da6875aa4a04ffa6bbed580b7f77041737b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.md @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually. J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +#### DEFENDANT J. MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER + +-0 rn r - -, co r - + +Defendant, J. , files Mopon to Appoint Commissioner and states: + +- 1. Defendant wishes to dep0lte?Srl th ecords Custodian of The New York Daily A y6-. News around July :3 I , 2010 in New ork, NY. The deposition duces tecum notice for this witness is attached to this Motion. +- 2. New York law does not authorize the issuance of a subpoena for the taking of a depositio ess a commission has been appointed. Accordingly, the defendant moves fo 1Oe a pointment of Metro Attorney Service, Inc., 305 Broadway, 14th Floor, New Y 10007 as the commissioner to take the deposition duces tecum of the Records Custodian of The New York Daily News. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, J. , respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant his Motion to Appoint Commissioner. + +# CERTICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. fog + +By: + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. BURMAN, CRITTON, et al. 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 3340 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et aI. 250 Australian Avenue Sm.& Suite 1400 West Palm 33401 + +Gary M. Jr. Farmer Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, BarnhdPPI hipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blv West Palm Beach, FL 334QE (561) 686-6300 (561 16 (fax) + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually. J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, deposition duces tecum (See attached Exhibit "M) of: will take the + +| NAME | | | n ZIIATE AND | +|---------------------|---|-----|--------------| +| New York Daily News | c | h.) | | +| | | | %OA. Ak | + +upon oral examination before US Legal Support, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. The depositions are being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the Rules of Court. + +# CERTICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July iern " 2010 — a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. + +By: + +cc: US Legal (via email) + +# SE + +Robert D. Caton, Jr. BURMAN, CRITTON, et al. 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 40 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australian AvenuWh Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300 (561)§84-5816 (fax) + +JAI SCAROLA Aka Fl ridi Bar Nocc40 + +**Exhibit "A" – DUCES TECUM** + +All taped conversations between [REDACTED] Rush and Jeffrey Epstein, including telephone recordings, all emails to and from Jeffrey Epstein or someone representing themselves to be Jeffrey Epstein. This request includes the 22 minute taped conversation that has already been identified between [REDACTED] Rush and Jeffrey Epstein as well as the transcript of that tape. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SC •HT ROTHSTEIN individually. J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION + +## THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Records Custodian New York Daily News, Go Legal D Attn: Anne Carrol 450, West 33rd Street New York, NY 10001 + +"wql(, C YOU ARE COMMANDED York, NY 10119-1410, on July to appear at U Leal Support, 1 Penn Plz, #1410, New 8/3/, 2010 @ :DV a.m., and to have with you at that ffi time and place the following: + +All taped conversations between Rush and Jeffrey Epstein, including telephone recordings, all emails to and from Jeffrey Epstein or someone representing themselves to be Jeffrey Epstein. This request includi.w 22 minute taped conversation that has already been identified between Rush and Jeffrey Epstein as well as the transcript of that tape. + +If you fall to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed by the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and unless excused from this subpoena by the attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +rz--- Dated July Iq 2010 + +By. + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300 + +carola, Esq. THE COURT \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b890b5460bc8c36a39549a29810ea3bf8476497 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323/EFTA02761323.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,517 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761323.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 5232, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.08, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.42499999999995, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 505.3498840332031, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 505.3498840332031, + 117.17498779296875 + ], + [ + 286.42499999999995, + 117.17498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT J. \nMOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.39000000000001, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 533.48583984375, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 533.48583984375, + 337.29498291015625 + ], + [ + 78.39000000000001, + 337.29498291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.552, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 381.3671875, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 381.3671875, + 128.05499267578125 + ], + [ + 231.552, + 128.05499267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.496, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 346.12199999999996, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 346.12199999999996, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 260.496, + 387.18 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.631, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 506.8498840332031, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 506.8498840332031, + 114.17498779296875 + ], + [ + 287.631, + 114.17498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.81, + 319.6824951171875 + ], + [ + 450.58282470703125, + 319.6824951171875 + ], + [ + 450.58282470703125, + 334.67498779296875 + ], + [ + 162.81, + 334.67498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.964, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.3754577636719, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.3754577636719, + 99.17498779296875 + ], + [ + 233.964, + 99.17498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.908, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 348.534, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 348.534, + 374.42498779296875 + ], + [ + 262.908, + 374.42498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit \"A\" \u2013 DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.904, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 391.95000000000005, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 391.95000000000005, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 221.904, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.133, + 33.21 + ], + [ + 528.936279296875, + 33.21 + ], + [ + 528.936279296875, + 75.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 308.133, + 75.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.25199999999998, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 441.51727294921875, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 441.51727294921875, + 296.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 171.25199999999998, + 296.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE STATE OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.873000000000005, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 204.2219696044922, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 204.2219696044922, + 324.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 54.873000000000005, + 324.43353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761323" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57175690e8adeebb938dabe83c1fbd0bdf6c3efc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.md @@ -0,0 +1,4275 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 1 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motiop4 : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.1** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN: +MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT** + +Defendants. + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Plaintiff or Epstein"), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion to Amend the Complaint in part for the reasons set forth below: + +1. 1. On or about December 7, 2009, the Plaintiff filed his action in this matter. +2. 2. It is the essence of the Plaintiff's action that the Defendants used actual lawsuits against Epstein or fabricated others to market investments to third parties for a return of investment on the Epstein cases. +3. 3. Is not the intention or position of the Plaintiff to put into issue whether or not the actions alleged against Epstein by various plaintiffs are true or not. Instead, the essence of the complaint is to focus on the alleged misconduct of filing legal motions and other actions in pursuit of civil litigation unrelated to the merits or value of the cases brought against the Plaintiff. More specifically, *See* the allegations contained on page 2 of the complaint, paragraphs 10, 21, 25, 26, 31-41. + +2011 JAN-6 PM 2:39 +JUNE F. 3000 CLERK +MEMPHIS BEACH CIVIL +CIRCUIT + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint + +4. (While the Plaintiff believes his complaint is clear, in an abundance of caution so as to remove any doubt as to whether the Plaintiff has put into issue his alleged responsibility for the claims brought against him, the Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint to eliminate the following paragraphs: + +- A. 42(e); +- B. 42(h); +- C. 46; +- D. 51; +- E. 52; +- F. 67(c); + +5. The Plaintiff respectfully submits that additional amendments will be necessary once the records subpoenaed from the trustee have been received and depositions occur relating to those records. However, this amendment is requested at this time for the purpose of clearing up any alleged inisapprehension, that the Plaintiff has placed in issue his alleged actual liability in the cases brought against him by Roth [REDACTED], Rosenfeldt & Adler. + +6. The undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + +7. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has and will continue to attempt to resolve this matter without the need of a hearing. + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 5th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 South Flager Drive +West Palm Beach, FL +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* + +[nat] W:\80743\Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint(1/5/11-14:59) + +# **APP.2** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 — MARRa + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, v. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +#### MOTION TO STRIKE REFERENCES TO NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO LIFT PROTECTIVE ORDER ILIARRING JANE DOE'S ATTORNEY'S FROM REVEALING PROVISIONS IN THE AGREEMENT + +Plaintiff, Jane Doe, hereby moves this Court to strike all references to a "nonprosecution agreement" contained in defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Motion to Stay these proceedings. Under the Best Evidence Rule, Fed. R. Evid. 1002, and the principles underlying the rule, Epstel quired to produce the written agreement (or a copy thereof) rather than sirc ply n his own summary representations about what In s) alternative, the Court should lift the protective order it has entered in parallel tion that precludes Jane Doe's counsel from revealing in publicly-accessible pleadings the specific language in the non-prosecution agreement. the agreement provides. + +In his motion to stay these proceedings, defendant Epstein has argued that he must invoke his Fifth Amendment rights lest he be found in violation of a nonprosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Indeed, his pleading makes a number of specific representations about the contents of that agreement. See, e.g, Epstein Motion to Stay at 3 (the non-prosecution agreement "outlines various obligations on the part of Epstein including, but not limited to, pleading guilty to the Indictment and Information before the 15th Judicial Circuit, recommendations for his sentencing before the 15th Judicial Circuit, waiver of challenges to the Information filed by the SAO, waiver of right to appeal his conviction, . . . and the agreement to not prosecute others listed thereon so long as Epstein does not breach and fulfills the requirements of the NPA"). Epstein's pleading makes further representations about what is not contained in the agreement. See, e.g., id. (the non-prosecution agreement "does not outline or define . . . what constitutes a breach or w ',of omission constitutes a breach thereof"). + +All references in his motion to the content of thewsm- secution agreement should be stricken. The Best Evidence Rule requires Epstein to produce the nonprosecution agreement itself to prove what the agreement says — not some secondhand summary. Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 directly provides: "To prove the content of a writing . . . , the original writing . . . is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress." The non-prosecution agreement is undoubtedly a "writing." See Epstein Motion to Stay at 2 (conceding this point). Moreover, it is obvious that Epstein is trying to prove its "content" in his motion to stay, as he is relying various provisions within the agreement to make his case for a stay. As the mov g =rty on his motion for a stay, he is therefore obligated to provide the best evi of the written agreement — namely, a copy of the agreement itself. + +The rationales underlying the Best Evidence Rule clearly apply here. As two leading commentators have explained: + +The continuing existence of the Best Evidence Rule rests upon several considerations. First, writings occupy a central position in the law. The written word has special sanctity, justifying more stringent proof requirements. Second, when the contents of a writing are in issue, an y evidence other than the writing itself is distinctly inferior. Language is complex, and the slightest variation in wording can have enormous significance in determining the outcome of a legal dispute. Unless a writing is very short, it is beyond the power of most human memory to summarize the writing with the precision that is often needed in the courtroom. The burden on litigants of requiring them to introduce the writing if available is outweighed by the increased accuracy of the factfinding process. Third, production of the writing . . . ensures completeness and prevents any segments from being presented out of context. + +B. MUELLER & LAIRD C. KIRKPATRICK, EVIDENCE § 10.1 at p. 1067 (3d ed. 2003); see also Seiler v. Lucas film, Ltd., 808 F.2d 1316, 1319 (9th Cir. '1986) ("when the terms are in dispute only the writing itself, or a true copy, provides reliable evidence"). + +Epstein is making some rather remarkable assertions about what the agreement provides (or fails to provide) and how it operates in practice, as Jane Doe explains at greater length in her accompanying response to his motion for a stay. To prove those assertions, Epstein should not be able to rely on his own inferences from provisions contained in the agreement — but rather should be required to provide the specific language supporting those inferences. + +In the alternative, if Epstein is allowed to make his own representation about the (contents of the agreement, then Jane Doe should likewise be allowed to make her own) (representations about what the document provides) Jane Doe's undersigned attorneys have a copy of what is apparently the non-prosecution agreement. They obtained that agreement in parallel litigation under the Crime Victim's Rights Act. Doe v. United States, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM. (The agreement, however, was provided to Jane) (Doe's counsel subject to a protective order. That protective order precludes Jane Doe's) (attorneys from revealing "the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further) + +court order Protective Order, Doe v. United States, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM + +(dkt. #26) (Aug. 21, 2008). That Protective Order thus precludes Jane Doe from responding to Epstein's allegations in a publicly-filed motion because her response would necessarily involve disclosing the "terms" of the agreement. Jane Doe therefore requests the alternative relief of having the protective order lifted so that her attorney's can respond directly to Epstein's allegations about what the non-prosecution agreement provides.' If the protective order is lifted, Jane Doe would accordingly request an opportunity to file a supplemental pleading in opposition to the motion to stay to discuss those provisions. + +#### CONCLUSIO + +For all these reasons, all references to the non-prosecution agreement in Epstein's motion for a stay should be stricken. In the alternative, the Court should lift its protective order and permit Jane Doe's counsel to file a supplemental response to the motion to stay discussing the specific provisions in the agreement. Because the United States may have an interest in this motion, a copy of the motion is being served on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. + +DATED: April 9.2009 + +I Lifting the protective order may be useful for other reasons as well. For example, Jane Doe intends to question Epstein about the terms of the non-prosecution agreement at his upcoming deposition. If the protective order remains in place, Jane Doe may be required to proceed cumbersomely by first have Epstein reveal the provisions of the agreement and then asking about the provisions. Because only the narrow issue of the motion to stay is currently before the Court, Jane Doe has confined her arguments to that issue. Jane Doe reserves her right to file an appropriate motion at the appropriate time for release of the non-prosecution agreement on other grounds. + +Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwards@rra-law.com + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 9, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing is being served this day upon all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically otices of Electronic Filing. + +> s/ J. J. + ++6s + +**SERVICE LIST** + +**Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 – MARRA/[REDACTED]** + +*Attorneys for Defendant* + +**Robert Deweese Critton, Jr.** + +rcrit@bclclaw.com + +**Michael James Pike** + +MPike@bclclaw.com + +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman + +515 N Flagler Drive + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-2918 + +561-842-2820 + +561-515-3148 (fax) + +*Lead Counsel* + +**Jack Alan Goldberger** + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South + +Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +561-659-8300 + +835-8691 (fax) + +jagesq@bellsouth.net + +*Co-Counsel* + +*Attorney for United States* + +**A. [REDACTED] Villafaña** + +Assistant U.S. Attorney + +U.S. Attorney's Office + +500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 820-8711 + +Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 + +[REDACTED] + +**[VIA US MAIL]** + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* + +[REDACTED] **James [REDACTED]** + +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler + +401 East Las Olas Blvd + +Suite 1650 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954-522-3456 + +954-527-8663 (fax) + +bedwards@rra-law.com + +*Lead Counsel* + +**Paul G. Cassell** + +332 South 1400 E, Room 101 + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 + +801-585-5202 + +801-585-6833 (fax) + +cassellp@law.utah.edu + +*Pro Hac Vice* + +**Jay C. Howell** + +Jay Howell & Associates PA + +644 Cesery Boulevard + +Suite 250 + +Jacksonville , FL 32211 + +jay@jayhowell.com + +**APP.3** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 — MARRa + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, v. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +#### PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT + +#### Parties. Jurisdiction and Venue + +Plaintiff, Jane Doe, hereby brings this'Wmended Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows." + +- 1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of \$50,000,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. +- 2. This First Amended Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe, because this Complaint makes allegations of sexual assault and child abuse of a then minor. +- 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. +- 4. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was a resident of the State of New York. +- 5. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a residence located in Palm Beach County, Florida. + +6. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male born in 1953. + +7. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claim set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) as the matter in controversy exceeds \$75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs and is between citizens of different states. + +8. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the cl 14.irred in this district. + +9. At all times material, Defendant, Jeffrey Epste , owed a duty unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe, to treat her in a non-negligent n afii end to not commit intentional or tortious or illegal acts against her. t;.\. + +#### Factual Alienations + +10. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, has demonstrated a sexual preference and obsession for minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, and enterprise in which he gained access to economically disadvantaged minor girls, such as Plaintiff, Jane Doe, and sexually battered these girls, and/or coerced them to engage in prostitution. + +11. Defendant's plan, scheme, and enterprise included an elaborate system wherein the then minor Plaintiff, and other minor girls, were contacted by telephone by Defendant Epstein, or other unknown employees or assistants working for Defendant Epstein, and Epstein's assistants would persuade the minor girls, including Jane Doe, to come over to defendant Epstein's house for the purpose of engaging in prostitution. + +12. Plaintiff Jane Doe was contacted by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein himself or or other unknown employees or assistants of Defendant Epstein on numerous occasions, and she was often times brought to Defendant Epstein's residence with the assistance of Defendant Epstein's assistants. + +13. or other employees/assistants of Defendant Epstein would often arrange with the Yellow Cab cab company to take minor girls, including Jane Doe, to Defendant Epstein's house. + +14. Once the then minor girl, including Plaintiff Jane Doe, arrived at Epstein's house, the assistants and employees left the then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls alone in a room at the defendant's mansion. Subsequently, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, himself would appear, remove his clothing, and direct the then minor Plaintiff to remove her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including, but not limited to, masturbation, touching of the then minor Plaintiff's sexual organs, using vibrators or sexual toys on the then minor Plaintiff, and digitally penetrating the then minor Plaintiff. + +15. Defendant Epstein traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of luring minors s to his mansion to sexually abuse or batter them; he used the telephone t act these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostittrl d to enable himself to commit sexual battery against them and acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired with others, including his assistants and detection. , to further commit these acts and to avoid police + +16. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was first brought to Defendant Epstein's mansion in early 2003, when she was a fourteen-year old in middle school. + +17. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier with a lavish home, significant wealth, and a network of assistants and employees, used his resources and his influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitive behavior. + +18. Beginning in approximately February 2003 and continuing until approximately June 2005, the defendant coerced and enticed the impressionable, vulnerable, and economically deprived then minor Plaintiff in order to commit various acts of sexual misconduct against her. These acts included, but were not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and illegal sexual touching of the then minor Plaintiff, sexual misconduct and masturbation of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in the presence of the then minor Plaintiff, and encouraging apart coercing the then minor Plaintiff to become involved in prostitution. + +19. Defendant, Jet: Epstein, used his money, wealth and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff into a deviant and delinquent lifestyle. + +20. The above-described sexual acts took place in Palm Beach County, Florida at the residence of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Any assertions by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by the provisions of applicable Florida Statutes concerning the sexual exploitation, sexual battery, and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of the plaintiff, Jane Doe's minority. + +21. The above-described acts were perpetrated upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff regularly and on dozens of occasions. + +22. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution, for which Defendant EpsteiN c ii,klas sentenced to 18 months incarceration in Palm Beach County jail to be followed b months community control (house arrest). + +#### COUN14/ < <\_ \A) ) + +#### Sexual Battery upon a Minor + +23. The Plaintiff, Jane Doe, repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 21 above. N + +24. On numerous Ccasions, Defendant Epstein did in fact intentionally touch Plaintiff, Jane Doe, on her person against her will and/or without her legal consent. + +25. Defendant Epstein battered her sexually, in that he touched her in intimate areas of her body and person in an offensive manner while she was a minor child, and therefore the touchings were without legal consent. + +26. Defendant Epstein touched her in intimate areas of her body on dozens of occasions between approximately February 2003 and approximately June 2005. + +27. The conduct described in this count constitutes battery against the person of the then minor Plaintiff. + +28. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's sexual battery on Plaintiff, Jane Doe, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of her childhood, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to N.. enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in na \ d Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 777 + +( Si\ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Ja esiiieo, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory da r ages, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT II + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 + +laintiff, Jane Doe, adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 above. + +30. The allegations contained herein in Count II are a separate and distinct legal remedy. + +31. As a condition of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government, wherein he acknowledged Plaintiff Jane Doe as a victim of certain criminal offenses he committed against Jane Doe. + +32. The Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was in fact a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +33. Specifically, Defendant Epstein: + +(a) knowingly conspired with others known and unknown to use a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, or entice minor females, including Plaintiff Jane Doe, to engage in prostitution, in violation of title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). + +(b) knowingly and willfully conspired with others known (such as and unknown to travel in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with minors, including Plaintiff Jane Doe, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, in violation fo Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b); all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(e); + +(c) used a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, or entice minor females, including Plaintiff Jane Doe, to engage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b); + +(d) traveled in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, including Plaintiff Jane Doe; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b). + +34. As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned criminal offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, the Plaintiff Jane Doe has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, Jane Doe, has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT III + +#### Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress + +35. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 above. + +36. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's inappropriate sexual conduct towards the then minor Plaintiff was extreme and outrageous; under the circumstances, his conduct was outrageous and so extreme in degree that it should not be tolerated in a civilized community. + +37. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein acted with the intent to'cause severe emotional distress or with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress upon the then minor Plaintiff. + +38. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was w tare that Plaintiff was a minor child, and yet he continued to sexually abuse ?h s S, nally and recklessly causing Plaintiff to suffer extreme emotional distress.st are + +39. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's intentional, deliberate and reckless conduct caused severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff, Jane Doe. Defendant, at the time he committed these numerous sexual assaults on Plaintiff, Jane Doe, had a specific intent to harm the the? inor Plaintiff, and his conduct did so harm the Plaintiff. + +40., Q direct and proximate result of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's intentional and re nduct, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer severe emotional distress, physical injury, pain and suffering, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and Plaintiff, Jane Doe, will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT IV\ < < \A) ) + +#### Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices + +41. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 above and for the purposes of this count incorporates and alleges the RICO Statement that has been contemporaneously herewith as Exhibit "A." + +42. The allegations contained herein in Count IV are a separate and distinct legal remedy brought pursuant to Florida Statute 772.104(1) and (2). + +43. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was associated with an enterprise, a group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, which was comprised of at least Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and (and likely many other yet unknown persons); Defendant Epstein participated in this enterprise, or conspired or endeavored to so participate, through a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statutes §772.103(3)-(4), as further outlined in detail in the RICO statement filed with this court. + +44. This enterprise was separate and distinct from Epstein himself and had a definite hierarchical structure. Epstein served informally but effectively as the leader, C.E.O, or "boss" of this organization, directing his underlings how to recruit and procure young girls for his sexual activities and when to bring the girls to his mansion. Ep key "lieutenant" in the organization was who served as both his scheduler and a recruiter/procurer of the girls. also served as a recruiter and helped Epstein satisfy his criminal sexual desires by, on occasion, directly participating in sexual abuse and prostitution of the minor girls. Epstein also used otherwise-legitimate business activities to help further the purpose of the trim,' enterprise. These apparently legitimate activities provided "cover" for and his associates to commit the crimes. Epstein and his associ q .,m tamed the appearance of running an upstanding investment busin ( A' connections to modeling agencies and other powerful business and political people, to well as other legitimate businesses with discourage the minor girls from reporting the abuse to law enforcement. + +45. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein participated in this enterprise through a pattern of criminal activity in that he engaged in at least two incidents of criminal activity, as defined in Florida Statute 772.102 and as described below, that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission and are not isolated incidents. + +46. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein engaged in criminal activity by committing, attempting to commit, conspiring to commit or soliciting, coercing or intimidating another person to commit one or more of the following predicate acts as outlined and defined in Florida Statute 772.102: + +(a) Procuring for prostitution, or causing to be prostituted, any person who is under the age of 18 years in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.03; + +(b) Acts of battery in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 784; + +(c) Forcing, compelling or coercing another come a prostitute in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.04; + +(d) knowingly recruiting, enticing, harboring, trabhsortiIig, providing or otherwise obtaining by any means a person, knowing t \-rcion would be used to cause that person to engage in prostitution in vi at Florida Statutes Chapter 796.045; + +914.22; tampering with a wit ( s s,Sin \4iolation of Florida Statutes Chapter + +altering, des4yin , removing, or concealing records or documents or other evidence with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 918.13; + +(g) maintaining a place for the purpose of lewdness or prostitution; offering or Ktiirig another for the purpose of prostitution or for some other lewd or indece receiving persons into his Palm Beach mansion for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness; directing, taking or transporting or agreeing to direct take or transport persons to his Palm Beach mansion with knowledge or reasonable belief that the purpose of such directing, taking or transporting was prostitution or lewdness; all in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.07. + +47. The criminal acts of Defendant Epstein occurred repeatedly over a substantial period of time and were not isolated events. + +48. Under Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's plan, scheme, and enterprise, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, paid employees and underlings, including but not limited to , to bring him minor girls to his Palm Beach mansion in order for the Defendant to solicit, induce, coerce, entice, compel or force such girls to engage in acts of prostitution and sexual misconduct with Defendant Epstein and sometimes Nadia and to otherwise commit acts of sexual battery thereon. + +49. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was the victim of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's plan, scheme, and enterprise and was so injured by reason of his violations of the provisions of s. 772.104. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was called on the telephone by Defendant Epstein and other employees of his, including Sarah Kellen, and transported to the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's residence, where she was placed in a room along with the Defendant, enticed to commit acts of prostitution, and had acts of sexual battery and sexual exploitation committed against her. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, conspired with his assistants and employees in order to accomplish their common motive or intent of seeking out, gakriing access to, and exploiting minor children such as the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, in th of mentioned ways, and he further conspired with his employees, assistan d underlings to ensure that the crimes of this criminal enterprise were concealed or undetected by law enforcement. + +50. After law enforcement began to detect the criminal activities of Defendant Epstein and the other persons involved in the criminal enterprise, the enterprise used resources and information to conceal the illegal activities of the enterprise, threaten the victims of the crimes of the enterprise if they revealed the full scope of the enterprise to law enforcement, and concealed or destroyed documents relevant to the prosecution of the various members of the enterprise. The enterprise also made various efforts to discourage the victims from cooperating with law enforcement and from filing civil lawsuits to vindicate their rights. Epstein and other members of the enterprise made cash payments and gave gifts to the victims of the enterprise in order to discourage them from reporting crimes to law enforcement and other authorities. + +51. The evidence clearly and convincingly establishes that Plaintiff Jane Doe was injured by reason of violations of the provisions of 772.103, and as such is entitled to threefold the actual damages sustained and a mi imum of \$200, and reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. + +52. In the alternative, and pu ' et . 772.104, Plaintiff Jane Doe was injured due to sex trafficking committed in ation of s. 772.103 and is thus entitled to c tot threefold the amount gained from the sex trafficking and to a minimum amount of damages not less than \$200, reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. + +WHEREFORE, under the provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 772, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, denzands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for any minimum damages a tho ed by law, all actual damages sustained (to be trebled as authorized by la costs and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT V + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to Florida Statute 796.09 Against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein + +- 54. Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 above. +- 55. The allegations contained herein in Count II are a separate and distinct legal remedy. +- 56. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was a wealthy and powerful man, and Plaintiff was an economically disadvantaged and impressionable minor. +- 57. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used his vast wealth and power to coerce Plaintiff into prostitution and/or coerced her to remain in prostitution. +- 58. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, coerced Plaintiff into prostitution in one or more of the following ways: + - A. Domination of her mind and body through exploitive techniques; + - B. Inducement; + - C. Promise CI-grester financial rewards; +- D. Exploita ) of a condition of developmental disability, cognitive limitation, affective disor er, and/or substance dependency; Ar""\ 6 "ploitation of human needs for food, shelter or affection; Exploitation of underprivileged and vulnerable economic condition or situation; +- G. Use of a system of recruiting other similarly situated minor girls to further coerce and induce Plaintiff into the lifestyle of prostitution; and + +H. Exploitation through demonstration of abundant wealth and power to impress a young and vulnerable then minor Plaintiff and to coerce her into prostitution. + +59. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses committed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, against Plaintiff pursuant to Florida Statutes §796.09, the Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, demands judgment against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +DATED: April 17, 2009 + +Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwards@rra-law.com + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 17, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing is being served this day upon all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. + +J. + +**SERVICE LIST** + +**Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 – MARRA/ [REDACTED]** + +*Attorneys for Defendant* + +**Robert Deweese Critton, Jr.** + +rcrit@bclclaw.com + +**Michael James Pike** + +MPike@bclclaw.com + +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman + +515 N Flagler Drive + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-2918 + +561-842-2820 + +561-515-3148 (fax) + +*Lead Counsel* + +**Jack Alan Goldberger** + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South + +Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +561-659-8300 + +835-8691 (fax) + +jagesq@bellsouth.net + +*Co-Counsel* + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* + +**[REDACTED] James [REDACTED]** + +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler + +401 East Las Olas Blvd + +Suite 1650 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954-522-3456 + +954-527-8663 (fax) + +bedwards@rra-law.com + +*Lead Counsel* + +**Paul G. Cassell** + +332 South 1400 E, Room 101 + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 + +801-585-5202 + +801-585-6833 (fax) + +cassellp@law.utah.edu + +*Pro Hac Vice* + +**Jay C. Howell** + +Jay Howell & Associates PA + +644 Cesery Boulevard + +Suite 250 + +Jacksonville , FL 32211 + +jay@jayhowell.com + +JANE DOE v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRAME O4, EXHIBIT "A" C'v + +#### CIVIL RICO CASE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 12.1 + +1. Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges a violation of Florida Statutes §§ 772.103(3) (participation in an enterprise through a criminal activity) and 772.103(4) (conspiracy to do so). The following information describes both the § 772.103(3) claim and the § 772.103(4) conspiracy claim, with the additional note that the conspiracy was between defendant Jeffrey Epstein, , and numerous other persons whose identity is, at this time, unknown to Jane Doe. Epstein, and others all conspired together to violate the provisions of § 772.103(3), doing so willfully and with full knowledge of the criminal activities that were planned as part of the criminal enterprise. For convenience in this statement, Florida Statutes §§ 772.103(3) and (4) will be referred to as the "Florida Civil RICO provisions." + +2. While others (including Kellen and Marcinkova) were involved in the plan, scheme, and enterprise, the sole defendant alleged in this complaint at this time is defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein served as the leader and informal "C.E.O." of the criminal enterprise. He also criminally sexually abused and prostituted Jane Doe and other minor girls who were victims of the criminal enterprise. He also paid for and to be a part of the enterprise and conspired with them to commit criminal acts of sexual abuse and prostitution of minors. The basis for Epstein's liability is also described in Jane Doe's complaint. + +3. The other wrongdoers included and (Jane Doe is uncertain as to the precise spelling of their names and their full legal names.) They assisted defendant Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting and procuring minor girls to satisfy Epstein's criminal sexual purposes and for prostitution. For example, they contacted the minor girls on the telephone to schedule times for each girl to "work" for Defendant Epstein at his house, and they helped to arrange for minor girls to travel to Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion to satisfy his sexual desires for minor girls. + +and also conspired with Epstein to commit acts of sexual abuse and prostitution with minor girls and aided and abetted Epstein in the abuse and prostitution. + +and had full knowledge of the crimes of the enterprise; they knew full well that the girls who were coming to Epstein's mansion were minors and that Epstein was sexually abusing and prostituting these minors, some of whom were 14 or younger. + +and willfully and knowingly participated in the activities of the enterprise and intended to make the criminal activities of the enterprise succeed. + +Among other things, helped arrange for recruiters of the minor girls, and assisted Epstein in converting minor girls into prostitutes for Epstein's sexual gratification as well + +as encouraged and coerced these minor girls into recruiting additional minor girls for Epstein, and sometimes Ma, to sexually batter and exploit, all in furtherance of + +the goal of the criminal enterprise. She also spoke personally to the recruiters as well as to the minor girls who were victims of Epstein sexual abuse. At Epstein's specific + +direction, Kellen spoke to the recruiters about subjects such as finding more minor girls to satisfy Epstein's criminal sexual appetite. also served as Epstein's scheduler, + +scheduling appointments for the minor girls to ostensibly do "work" when in fact (as she well knew) she was scheduling them to be sexually abused and prostituted by Epstein. + +thus procured minor girls for prostitution and caused them to be prostituted. also directly participated in the sexual abuse of the minor girls by + +participating in unlawful sexual activities and prostitution with the girls. Both and + +assisted Epstein in attempting to keep Epstein's criminal sexual abuse unknown to law enforcement and other authorities and in discouraging the minor girls from reporting the crimes to law enforcement and other authorities. + +4. The names of all of the victims are unknown to the plaintiff at this time. However, they include Jane Doe herself as well as the victim in E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. A list of more than 30 such minor female victims has previously been provided by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Epstein (but not to Jane Doe). The injuries to those victims resulted from criminal sexual activity and prostitution with Epstein and Marcinkova. The injuries they suffered are like those suffered by Jane Doe in this action, as described in paragraph 25 of her complaint. For example, Jane Doe and the other victims suffered grave emotional distress and financial injury from being forced to engage in unlawful sexual activities with him to which, as minors, they could not lawfully consent. They also suffered distress and financial injury from being prostituted by him. + +5. The pattern of racketeering and/or criminal activity is also described in the complaint, which Jane Doe incorporates by reference into this statement here and at all other points in the statement. The criminal activity included Epstein using paid employees and underlings (including and ) to repeatedly find, procure, and bring to him minor girls in order for Epstein to solicit, induce, coerce, entice, compel or force these minor girls to engage in unlawful sexual activity and acts of prostitution. + +The criminal activity and specific statutes violated that are relevant to the RICO count include, but are not necessarily limited to: Procuring for prostitution, or causing to be prostituted, any person who is under the age of 18 years in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.03; Acts of battery in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 784; Forcing, compelling or coercing another to become a prostitute in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.04; knowingly recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing or otherwise obtaining by any means a person, knowing that coercion would be used to cause that person to engage in prostitution in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.045; tampering with a witness in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 914.22; altering, destroying, removing, or concealing records or documents or other evidence with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 918.13; maintaining a place for the purpose of lewdness or prostitution; offering or securing another for the pall of prostitution or for some other lewd or indecent act; receiving persons into his Palm Beach mansion for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness; directing, taking or transporting or agreeing to direct take or transport persons to his Palm Beach mansion with knowledge or reasonable belief that the purpose of such directing, taking or transporting was prostitution or lewdness; all in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.07. Numerous other crimes were committed by the criminal enterprise against the minor victims; however, those numerous other crimes are not crimes enumerated in the "criminal activity" section of the civil RICO section. + +a. The dates of the events are not fully known to Jane Doe at this time. However, at a minimum, Epstein obtained minor girls (including Jane Doe) for sexual purposes of the period of approximately June 2002 through November 2005. Epstein could better determine than Jane Doe the precise dates of his abuse of her by reviewing his schedule for this period of time and looking for notations of days on which she performed "work" for him. Epstein has pled guilty to two such criminal offenses against minor girls, although the total number of indictable or chargeable offenses would easily number more than 100. On each of these occasions, as described in the complaint, Epstein would have his underlings (including ) procure a minor girl to satisfy his sexual desires and then would satisfy his sexual desires through criminal sexual contact and conduct with the minor girls. Epstein would also watch =Iva sexually abuse the minor girls to satisfy his sexual desires. Epstein had a particular interest in minor girls, including girls as young as 14 or younger. On occasion, he would turn away girls who were 18 or over because of perverse and unlawful sexual interest in young girls. Epstein recruited and paid the girls for the sexual activities. In doing so, he procured for prostitution, and caused to be prostituted, many young girls under the age of 18, in violation of (among other statutes) Florida Statute § 796.03. The pattern of criminal and unlawful sexual activity extended from at least June 2002 through November 2005. Epstein committed unlawful sexual abuse against Jane Doe at least 20 times between February 2003 to June 2005 while she was a minor. Other criminal activities involving tampering with and harassing witnesses occurred from June 2002 through early 2008 (and perhare,-). + +n many of the occasions, the exact dates of which are not as yet determined by the Jane Doe, Epstein would represent that he was interested in a "massage" or legitimate "work" when in fact he was interested in unlawful sexual activity with the minor girls, including fondling the girls, masturbating in their presence, and vaginally penetrating them or causing them to be penetrated. Epstein and others acting under his direction falsely represented to the minor girls that he was interested in a "massage" or "work" when in fact he was interested in procuring the girls for unlawful sexual activity and acts of prostitution. Epstein and others acting under his direction used means of interstate communications to make these false representations, including cellular telephones. + +c. Epstein has pled guilty to two Florida criminal offenses against minor girls. + +d. The relationship of the criminal activity to the enterprise is also described in the complaint. The Florida offenses to which Epstein pled guilty are but a few of the many instances of his plan succeeding. The acts are all related to each other, are arranged, and are part of a common plan for these reasons: they have the same intent (to gratify Epstein's unlawful sexual interest in minor girls); the same results (the unlawful sexual abuse and prostitution of minor girls); the same accomplices (including and frequently ); the same victims (Jane Doe was herself victimized more than 20 times, and many other girls were also victimized repeatedly); the same means (there was a standard payment of several hundred dollars for going to the mansion, and standard escalation feature depending on the nature of the sexual acts that Epstein performed); and the same methods of commission (Epstein obtained young, skinny, and attractive girls to satisfy his sexual desires while they were economically disadvantaged and lacked a stable family life and therefore, he perceived, would be interested in obtaining money and unlikely to report his crimes to law enforcement). The acts were also interrelated by common characteristics, namely the identity of the perpetrator (Epstein and often ) and the common results of his crimes (sexual abuse and acts of prostitution with minor girls). The acts also constituted a clear pattern of criminal activity. + +6. (The criminal acts of Epstein occurred repeatedly over a substantial period) of time and were not isolated events. In particular, Epstein committed repeated (more (than 20) criminal acts of sexual abuse against Jane Doe from approximately February) (2003 to June 2005. He committed similar criminal acts of unlawful sexual activity and) prostitution against other minor girls for a period of time exceeding more than three) (years, from approximately June 2002 through November 2005.) (The acts occurred) (frequently during this time, easily exceeding more than 100 instances of criminal sexual) (abuse. (Jane Doe does not know the exact number of acts, but intends to determine) (this during the discovery process. It is possible that the total number of acts could be) (several hundred or thousand.) The acts were part of Epstein's regular way of doing) (business (e.g., obtaining sexual gratification) during this period of time. Epstein and) (others acting at his direction (including made hundreds of telephone calls in) (furtherance of these illegal activities. It is common belief that the sexual acts against) (minors temporarily ceased in approximately November 2005 when Epstein learned that) (law enforcement authorities were investigating his crimes. If, however, Epstein, through) (his criminal enterprise, is given the opportunity to commit similar acts in the future upon) (his release from jail, the enterprise will likely continue this illegal activity. In addition) (Epstein committed criminal acts of tampering with witnesses in violation of Florida) (Statutes § 914.22. For example, Epstein paid the minor girls money not only with the) (intent to prostitute them but also with the specific intent of causing the minor girls not to) communicate to law enforcement officers information about the sexual abuse committed @gainst them.) (Epstein made bigger payments to the minor girls depending on the) + +degree of force he used towards them, making larger payments when he was more) (concerned about the fact they might report the crimes committed against them. These) payments pose a continuing threat of misconduct, as they may interfere with the ability) (of law enforcement to discover and prosecute all of Epstein's crimes. Epstein or other', (members of his enterprise, paid for attorney's to represent several of his minor victims) (while he and his employees or assistants were being criminally investigated in an effort) (to influence the testimony of persons that had information otherwise valuable to law) (enforcement. Epstein and his enterprise may likewise interfere with the ability of Jane) (Doe to discover all of the information supporting her claim.) kpstein also selected) (impoverished girls for his crimes, believing that the payments would be more effective in) (obtaining their silence and that their economic circumstances might make them less) likely to report to law enforcement. If all else failed, after having unlawful sex with the) (minor girls, Epstein would tell them not to tell anyone about their unlawful encounter or) ("bad things" would happen. In addition, since November 2005 and through the early) (part of 2008 (and perhaps later), Epstein and others acting at his direction have) (attempted to discourage the victims of his crimes from reporting his crimes and) (cooperating with law enforcement.) (For example, persons acting at the direction of) (Epstein have aggressively attempted to "interview" the victims or to "tail" the victims in) (their cars. They also harassed a victim shortly before she was to testify at a grand jury) (investigating Epstein. These efforts have been made not for legitimate investigative) (reasons but rather for the purpose of discouraging the victims from cooperating with law) (enforcement (and, in at least one case, the investigating grand jury) and from filing civil) (lawsuits to vindicate their rigta) + +7. The enterprise included, at a minimum, a group of individuals associated in fact to assist Epstein in recruiting and procuring minor girls and obtaining criminal gratification of his illegal sexual interest in minor girls. + +a. The persons constituting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Epstein, and as well as other persons whose names Jane Doe intends to identify during the discovery phase of this case. + +b. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure similar to a mafia-type family, although all the details of that structure are not currently known to Jane Doe. Through discovery, Jane Doe intends to ascertain the precise structure of the enterprise that enabled Epstein to commit sexual crimes against her. While Jane Doe does not currently know all of the details of the structure, she does know that the enterprise operated together on a continuing basis, with largely the same personnel for a common purpose. The shared purpose of the enterprise was to satisfy Epstein's illegal interest in having sexual activities with minor girls. The enterprise was not a mere informal conspiracy, but had a definite hierarchical structure. Epstein served informally but effectively as the leader, C.E.O. or "boss" of this organization, directing his underlings how to recruit and procure young girls for his sexual activities and when to bring the girls to his mansion. Epstein's key "lieutenant" in the organization was , who served as both his scheduler and a recruiter/procurer of the girls. This was an important function, as the recruiting was necessary to satisfy Epstein's desire to abuse a large number of different minor girls with different (albeit similar) physical attributes and the scheduling was necessary to insure that the minor girls would be brought to Epstein's mansion to be sexually abused and prostituted at a time when Epstein was there (but not at the same time, when they might learn of other girls' identities and possibly become emboldened to report his activities to law enforcement.) Scheduling was also necessary to ensure secrecy, so that as few persons as possible were aware that minor girls were coming at unusual hours to Epstein's mansion. also needed (directly or indirectly) to make transportation arrangements for many of the girls, as they were often too young to drive themselves to and from the mansion. Marcinkova also served as a recruiter and helped Epstein satisfy his criminal sexual desires by, on occasion, directly participating in sexual abuse and prostitution of the minor girls. Epstein, and all took steps to conceal the existence of the enterprise and to discourage the girls from reporting the sexual abuse and prostitution to law enforcement or other authority figures. Epstein also used otherwise-legitimate business activities to help further the purpose of the criminal enterprise. These apparently legitimate activities provided "cover" for Epstein and his associates to commit the crimes. Epstein also maintained the appearance of an upstanding and prominent banker and investor to discourage the minor girls from reporting the abuse to law enforcement. By projecting an image of financial power (and strong political connections to prominent politicians and current and former government officials and personal connections to prominent scientists), Epstein hoped to discourage the minor girls from reporting what he was doing to them by making it appear that they would not be believed. These business activities helped Epstein secure the financial resources to commit the crimes against the minor girls and to pay for prostituting them. For example, the activities paid for maintaining the mansion where the girls were abused and paid for the cellular telephones and other means of communications that were used to recruit and procure the girls. The business activities also helped to provide the funds to pay and large sums of money to participate in the illegal enterprise and make payments to the girls for performing sexual acts. In sum, Epstein and the persons under his direction associated in fact and functioned as a continuing unit. This enterprise produced a course of conduct that lead to a pattern of criminal activity involving hundreds of instances of sexual abuse and prostitution of minor girls. This enterprise was the vehicle for Epstein to commit his crimes against Jane Doe and other minor girls and operated on a continuing basis from June 2002 to November 2005 (and, in regard to witness tampering and harassment, through at least early 2008). The enterprise enabled Epstein to sexually abuse n c rt < I 0 stitute Jane Doe in particular on more than 20 occasions from February 20fa3 h June 2005. + +c. enterprise. Epstein served as th w\_ • fo but effective leader or "C.E.O." of the + +d. Epstein was a ciated with the enterprise as its informal but effective leader or "C.E.O." + +e. Epstein directed the affairs of the enterprise and the others in the enterprise ,r ed to his commands. + +ased on the facts that she currently possesses, Jane Doe specifically alleges and intends to prove both that (i) Epstein was an individual separate from the enterprise and (ii) the defendant was a member of the enterprise, namely that he served as the effective leader of the enterprise. With regard to point (i), the illegal enterprise had a definite structure and operational function apart from Epstein. The structure is described in greater detail in this statement in answer 5.b above. With regard to point (ii), the defendant was a member of the enterprise and served to execute many of the decisions and activities of the enterprise and to command the execution of others. Epstein personally engaged in sexual abuse of minor girls, including Jane Doe. Epstein also directed others to engage in sexual abuse of minor girls, including Epstein also procured girls for prostitution and caused these girls to be prostituted. Epstein also served as the leader of the enterprise. + +g. Epstein was a direct perpetrator of the racketeering activity. In particular, Epstein engaged in criminal acts of sexual abuse and prostitution with minor girls, as well as procuring girls for prostitution. He also directed others (i.e., to engage in such criminal acts and served as the leader of the criminal enterprise. + +8. (The relationship between the pattern of criminal activity and the enterprise) (is not completely known to Jane Doe at this time. There was a criminal entity separate) (and apart from the pattern of activity in which it engaged. The pattern of criminal activity) (was the series of crimes committed by Epstein and others, and includes the specific) crimes identified in part 5.a. above. These offenses were closely related and formed a) (clear pattern, as described in part 5.b above. These acts included acts of sexual abuse) (and procuring the prostitution of minors by Epstein personally and by acting (at Epstein's direction.) (In contrast, the enterprise was the group of persons who) (associated together for the common purpose of engaging in the criminal course of) (conduct described at greater length elsewhere in this statement, including part 5.e) (above. The group of persons included Epstein, (others whose identity is, at this time, unknown to Jane Doe.) + +9. In this part of the statement, Jane Doe will provide a description of the relationship between the otherwise-lawful activities of the enterprise and the criminal activities of the enterprise. The lawful and unlawful activities of the enterprise have been described in addition in the complaint and previous answers found in parts 5, 6 and 7 above (which Jane Doe expressly incorporates into her answer here). The usual and daily activities of the criminal enterprise included scheduling meetings, activities, and other events for Epstein — including scheduling "private time" in his mansion for Epstein to commit sexual crimes against minor girls. a served as Epstein's scheduler, scheduling both otherwise-lawful activities to provide "cover" for Epstein as well as the illegal sexual activities. The exact frequency with which the sexual crimes took place varied and is not known, at this time, to Jane Doe. However, when Epstein was in West Palm Beach, it often occurred on a weekly or daily basis (and, in some instances, took place on several times during a single day). The scheduling was designed to secure a private place in Epstein's mansion when few other persons would be present at the mansion, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Epstein's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The usual activities of the enterprise also included maintaining the mansion and securing means of communication (i.e., cellular telephones) to recruit minor girls and procure them for prostitution. The activities further included arranging transportation for the girls to and from the mansion if it was necessary. The enterprise also attempted to make Epstein appear to be an upstanding and law-abiding member of community and a successful businessperson, for reasons described in paragraph 6.b above. The enterprise served as the usual way + +in which Epstein would obtain sexual gratification. + +10. (Through his criminal enterprise, Epstein received perverse and unlawful) (sexual gratification from sexually abusing minor girls and engaging in acts of prostitution) (with them. He also received perverse sexual gratification from directing others (e.gj to sexually abuse and prostitute minor girls. He could not have gained) (access to the great number of minor girls without a structured and organized enterprise) (promoting the same agenda and plan) + +11. While Jane Doe's civil action alleges violations of the Florida Civil RICO statute rather than violations of the federal civil RICO statute, it should be noted that means of interstate communications were used to perpetrate the crimes against minor girls (including Jane Doe), including cellular and other telephones that Epstein used, or caused to be used, to arrange his illegal sexual activities and to recruit additional minor girls to participate in these activities. Through his recruitment and procuring of young girls, Epstein's activities directly affected interstate commerce. + +12. Based on the information currently known to her, Jane Doe does not allege that Epstein, who is a billionaire banker, used the enterprise to personally make a financial profit or to obtain the collection of an unlawful debt. That being said, Plaintiff Jane Doe does not concede that the enterprise did not turn a profit. Discovery will reveal this information regarding profits appreciated by the criminal enterprise through various criminal activities of the enterprise. Epstein did, however, make payments to and prostitute the minor girls for the sexual gratification that he obtained from them and to discourage them from reporting his crimes to law enforcement and other authorities. + +13. Based on the information currently known to her, Jane Doe does not + +allege that Epstein, who is a billionaire banker, used the enterprise to obtain or maintain control of a business enterprise or real property. Epstein did, however, use his West Palm Beach mansion to perpetrate the crimes against the then-minor girls. He also used his financial success to provide "cover" for his crimes, as described in part 6.b above. + +14. The criminal enterprise is described in the complaint and part 6 of this statement above, which description Jane Doe incorporates here. + +a. The enterprise included persons unknown to Jane Doe, but at least included Epstein and his paid assistants and + +b. Under the direction of Epstein, Kellen, and others whose names are unknown to Jane Doe arranged for minor girls to come to Epstein's mansion where he could sexual abuse them and prostitute them to satisfy his perverse sexual desires. and were responsible for recruiting the girls and procuring them for prostitution. Kellen was also responsible for scheduling a time when both Epstein and the minor girl could meet together at Epstein's mansion for the sexual abuse and for making travel arrangements (if necessary) for the girls. was also responsible for ensuring the privacy of the room in Epstein's mansion where Epstein would sexually abuse the girls. would participate in abusing and prostituting the girls for Epstein's sexual gratification. and received payments and other forms of compensation from Epstein for performing these illegal activities and for participating in the enterprise. Epstein, and also all took steps to discourage the girls from reporting these crimes to law enforcement, including making cash payments to the girls. + +c. As a result of the criminal enterprise, Jane Doe (then a minor) suffered criminal sexual abuse at the hands of Epstein. As alleged in greater detail in the complaint, this abuse primarily lead to actual damages, namely loss of personal property, for which she is statutorily entitled to no less than \$200. The property lost in the form of lost income, loss of ability to earn income, and monies expended by her for medical and psychological treatment. Stated simply, she lost money (property) as a result of this sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of Epstein's criminal enterprise. The abuse also lead to significant past and future physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of privacy, and other damages, including consequential damages from Epstein controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life fora minor. In addition, the time involved in the abuse created lost opportunities to pursue other activities (including economic activities) and lead to past and future financial and proprietary losses to Jane Doe, as well as the need for psychiatric services. Jane Doe has also suffered a loss of income, a loss of capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. It has also lead to the need to file this civil suit, with consequent attorney's fees. All of these damages w re used by, and proximately caused by, the criminal enterprise and its criminal All of these injuries were inflicted directly on Jane Doe and occurred by reason of the criminal acts of the enterprise, including the acts of sexual abuse by Epstein. + +d. The defendant "person" in the Florida Civil RICO action is, at this time, only defendant Epstein. Defendant Epstein is associated with a criminal enterprise that conducted and participated, both directly and indirectly, in a pattern of criminal activity in violation of both Florida and federal criminal law. The exact relationship between Epstein and the criminal enterprise is described in greater detail in parts 5 and 6 above. + +15. The criminal conspiracy involving the enterprise is described above. Jane Doe expressly incorporates that information into her statement here. The conspiracy was formed of Epstein, and others, who agreed to arrange for illegal sexual gratification by Epstein through the sexual abuse and prostitution of minor girls both by Epstein personally and by others (i.e., MEN) while he watched. The object and substance of the conspiracy was to obtain minor girls for Epstein so that he could satisfy his perverse sexual interest in minor girls, to recruit minor girls to be abused and prostituted for his gratification, to keep the existence of the sexual abuse from being learned by law enforcement and other authorities, and to discourage the victims from reporting the abuse to authorities. The conspiracy started no later than approximately June 2002 in West Palm Beach, Florida, and other locations. The sexual abuse of the minor girls appears to have, at least temporarily, ceased in approximately 2005. The conspiracy extended beyond November 2005 to early 2008 (and perhaps later) in its efforts to keep the criminal conspiracy unknown, as described in part 5.f above. The conspiracy committed numerous overt acts. For example, and arranged for minor girls to be brought to Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion so that he could sexually abuse the girls and obtain sexual gratification. Epstein sexually abused minor girls at his mansion and made payments to them and otherwise prostituted them there. + +16. Jane Doe suffered actual damages, including financial and proprietary injuries, as described in part 13.0 above. + +17. The enterprise injured Jane Doe and the other minor girls by enabling Epstein to sexually abuse and prostitute the girls. + +18. Defendant Epstein is liable for all the damages for his criminal activity and the activity of his criminal enterprise. (If additional defendants are added to the complaint, these other defendants may also be jointly and severable liable for the damages.) The damages for which Epstein is liable include compensatory damages (including damages for emotional distress as well as damages for financial and proprietary losses), attomey's fees, and such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. The amount of these damages is in excess of \$50,000,000. These damages recoverable under the Civil RICO count are trebled by operation of Florida Statutes 772.104. Jane Doe is aware of the provision in Florida Statutes 772.104(3) ("In no event shall punitive damages awarded under this section"), but is nonetheless entitled to punitive damag by virtue of her complaint. She is seeking punitive damages for Epstein's outrageous and egregious conduct and crimes under other provisions of law in this lawsuit. + +19. All of the above answers must be read in light of the complaint that has been filed in this case. Jane Doe expressly incorporates by reference her complaint as part of the answer to each of the above questions. Whenever the word "include" or its variations appears in this statement, the information that follows is not intended to be an exclusive listing. + +**APP.4** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +2 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR +3 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +4 E.W., ) + +5 Plaintiff, ) + +6 VS. ) + +No. 502008CA028058XXXXMBAD + +7 JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH +8 KELLEN, ) + +Defendants. ) + +COPY + +9 +10 West Palm Beach, Florida + +11 (April 30th, 2009) + +12 10:08 o'clock A.M. +13 +14 +15 +16 +17 - - - - - +18 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION +19 OF +20 JEFFREY EPSTEIN +21 - - - - - +22 +23 +24 +25 + +1 2 (Thereupon, a lunch break was taken from 1:12 to 2:32 p.m.) + +3 4 THE VIDEOGRAPHER; We're back on record 2:32. + +5 MR. Ready? + +6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Sure. + +7 B 9 ) Q. (By Mr. Mr,-Epank-did\_youi ever-care-about-any-of -the -feelings -of\_the\_minori girls-that-you-were-engaging-in-sex-with? + +10 MR. BURMAN: cb. to the form. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 THE WITNESS3 i intend to respond to all relevant regarding this lawsuit. Howeve he present time my attorneys have counsel that I cannot provide answers to any, questions relevant to this lawsuit at this time, so I must accept their advice or I lose potential -- I risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. + +19 20 21 22 And accordingly, I have to assert my Federal Constitutional rights as guaranteed by the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. + +23 24 Q. (By Mr. i Did it ever occur to you that any of these girls were somebody's daughter -- + +1 2 3 4 5 Q. (By Mr- IIIIIIi) Isn't it true that at the time that you were sexually battering these minor girls, you didn't care what happened to them44 and only cared about your only personal sexual. gratification? + +6 7 MR. BURMAN: Object to the fo to talk outside. 0 need. + +8 THE WITNESS: Me, too? + +9 10 THE VIDEOGRAPHERI f the record at 2.35. + +11 (Thereupon,, a brief break was taken.) + +12 13 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're back on the record at 2:36. + +14 15 16 17 MR. /TEMPLE: For the purposes of the record; I will tell you that this line of (cquestioning, in my view, is way beyond the O bounds of permissible discovery-type questions, and nothing but pure argument, and if you j continue in this vein, I will stop the deposition and we will seek instruction from Judge Hafele about what's permissible and what's not. 19 20 21 22 + +Q. (By Mr. (Isn't it true tfi3ETB 23 24 25 (the time you were inserting your fingers into the (yagina of these little kids, all you cared about was, (\_your own sexual gratification? + + MR. BURMAN: The deposition is over. + + THE VIDEOGRAPEER: Conclude at 2:37, end of tape 2 of 2. + + MR. BERGER: We're going to ordet copy, and we want the tape, also, Mr. Videographer. ( L ) + + MR. BURMAN: We want thit.a on as they. get theirs, we want ours"\_ + + (Thereupon,..the deposition was adjourned at ;2:38 p.m.) + +AQIII0copY + +C.) + +**APP.5** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO: 08-CV-80 2..hARRA/JOHNSON Defendant C) CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +JANE DOE NO. 4, + +VS. + +JEFF + +JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/ + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 6. + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 7, + +Plaintiff + +VS. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80%44AARRA + +C S\*S CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRA + +C.M.A., + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CW-MARRA + +Plaintiff, + +Vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. + +Defendant. + +DOE II, + +Plaintiff ck.. + +\Z\* + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. + +Defendants. + +CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA + +JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/ + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 102, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +CASE NO: 09-CV-806864M + +#### PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN, AND TO POST A \$15 MILLION BOND. TO SECURE POTENTIAL JUDGMENT + +COMES NOW Plaintiff Jane Doe, by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Motion for Injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64, for appointment of a receiver to take charge of Epstein's property, and to post a \$15 million bond to secure any potential judgment in this case, for the reasons explained in the accompanying supporting memorandum. + +Plaintiff Jane Doe, by and through her undersigned counsel, files this memorandum in support of her motion for appointment of a receiver to take charge of + +Epstein's property and to post a \$15 million bond to secure any potential judgment in this case. + +Epstein is a billionaire who recently has been fraudulently transferring his assets overseas and elsewhere with the intent to prevent Jane Doe (and possibly numerous other victims of his sexual abuse) from satisfying any judgment they might obtain against him. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 guarantees Jane Doe all available state law pre-judgment remedies to respond to these fraudulent transfers. Florida has adopted the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA), Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.101 et seq., which gives the Court power to appoint a receiver to take charge of assets that are being fraudulently transferred. Given the serious allegations of sexual abuse against Jane Doe when she was a minor, this Court should appoint a receiver to control and account for Epstein's assets and direct the receiver to post a \$15 million bond with this Court on behalf of Epstein to satisfy any judgment that Jane Doe might obtain. + +#### STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS + +1. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is the defendant in this action, which involves claims by Jane Doe that Epstein repeatedly sexually abused her when she was a minor. Because of the egregious and repeated acts of sexual abuse committed by Epstein, her complaint seeks damages in excess of \$50 million, including punitive damages. See Amended Complaint, ¶ 2. + +2. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is extremely wealthy. According to reputable press reports in the New York Times and elsewhere, he is a billionaire. He is also the owner + +of a Caribbean island in the Virgin Islands (Little St. James Island), where he serves as a financial advisor to other billionaires. He was previously a financial trader at Bear Steams. It is therefore reasonable to infer that he has a great deal of financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. + +3. According to reputable press reports, before his recent incarceration (discussed below), he frequently traveled around the globe in the company of such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to infer that he has international contacts, including international financial contacts. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 3. + +4. Over the past year, approximately 25 civil suits have been filed in Florida state courts and Florida federal courts raising similar allegations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein against minor girls. These complaints seek damages comparable to those sought by Jane Doe in this case. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 4. Accordingly, Epstein has currently pending against him lawsuits seeking more than \$1 billion in damages. He thus faces financial ruin. Id. + +5. On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein pled guilty to one count of procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and one count of felony solicitation to prostitution before the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail. + +6. Since those guilty pleas, he has been incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Detention facility. However, he has also been allowed out on a "work release" program, where he works at managing his financial interests. Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 5. + +7. Given the substantial claims against him, his international connections, and other information, Jane Doe's counsel has been gravely concerned that Epstein will fraudulently transfer all of his assets to overseas locations to defeat collection of any judgment that she might obtain against him. Accordingly, as part of discovery in this case, Jane Doe propounded requests for admissions by Epstein regarding whether he was fraudulently transferring assets. Rather than answering these requests for admission about on-going fraudulent transfers of his property, Jeffrey Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 6. + +8. Jeffrey Epstein's net worth is greater than \$1 billion. Jane Doe's First Request for Admissions (RFA's) #5, Attachment B to, this Pleading; Epstein's Resp. to RFA's #5, Attachment C to this Pleading. + +9. Since he was incarcerated, Jeffrey Epstein has, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons) conveyed money and assets in an attempt to insulate and protect his money and assets from being captures in civil lawsuits filed against him. Epstein's RespNo\_RFAs #6. + +10. Epstein ownve)rdi controls real estate property in foreign countries, including the Caribbean. Epstein's Resp. to RFAs #7 and #8. + +11. Ed. is currently moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of federal and Florida courts. Epstein's Resp. to RFA #21. + +12. Epstein is transferring these assets with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against him in this and other similar cases. Epstein's Resp. to RFA #22. + +13. Epstein could currently post a \$15 million bond to satisfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty. Epstein's Resp. to RFA #23. + +14. Epstein has blocked all discovery, in this and other related cases, regarding his assets. Affidavit of Paul Cassell at1117, 8. + +#### ARGUMENT + +#### I. EPSTEIN IS FRAUDULENTLY TRANSFERRING HIS ASSETS. + +As noted in the material facts above, defendant Epstein is currently making fraudulent transfers of his assets. In particular, he is currently moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of Federal and Florida courts, and is doing so with the specific intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against him in this and other similar cases. Statement of Material Facts #11 and #12. + +Because these material facts rest, in part, on Epstein's invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against seff-incrimination, it is pertinent to note that Jane Doe is entitled to an adverse inference from his invocation of his Fifth Amendment rights when asked whether he was/fraudulently transferring his assets overseas. Jane Doe propounded requests for admission to Epstein that asked specifically about on-going fraudulent transfers of assets. In response, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer incriminating questions. Of course, Epstein's "invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege, like the assertion of any privilege, stands in stark opposition to the otherwise liberal discovery rules, and 'undermine[s] to some degree the trial system's capacity to ascertain the truth." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 632 (E.D. Va. 2006) (quoting Robert Ileidt, The + +Conjurer's Circle — The Fifth Amendment Privilege in Civil Cases, 91 YALE L.J. 1062, 1082 (1982)). As a result, where a witness refuses to testify in a civil case on Fifth Amendment grounds, the permissible inference is that the witness's testimony, had it been given, "would not have been favorable to the claim." United States v. A Single Family Residence, 803 F.2d 625, 629 n.4 (11th Cir. 1986). Of course, the Fifth Amendment is not violated by such an inference. The concerns animating the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination are not in play "[i]n a civil suit involving only private parties" because "no party brings to the battle the awesome powers of the government, and therefore to permit an adverse inference to be drawn from exercise of the privilege does not implicate the policy considerations underlying the privilege." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S.308, 335 (1976). + +An adverse inference is entirely justified in this case. Epstein has remained silent when asked such straightforward requests for admissions: + +- Since being incarcerated you have, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons), conveyed money or assets in an attempt to insulate or protect your money or assets from being captured in awsuits filed against you. RFA's #6. + +A÷ are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts. RFA's #21. + +- You are making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against you in this or similar cases. RFA's #22. + +#### CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON + +The silence in the face of these questions speaks far louder than words. As Justice Brandeis recognized long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.- Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. + +In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action for a court to take when a litigant blocks legitimate discovery through exercise r a" invocation. "[W]hile there is no doubt that a witness is entitle cidt ysert the privilege in a civil case, it is also clear that an adverse inference b a refusal to answer in a fth Amendment civil case is an appropriate remedy, as it provides ef for the civil litigant whose case is unfairly prejudiced by a witness' assertion f the Fifth Amendment privilege without placing the witness in the 'cruel trilemma' of choosing among incrimination, perjury, or contempt." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LW, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 633 (E.D. Va. 2006). The Eleventh Circuit has not hesitated to support district courts that draw an adverse inference from silence. For example, in United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996), the district court drew an adverse inference when claimants to real property refused to answer questions regarding the property. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed that decision, explaining that "[t]his Court has held . . . that the trier of fact may take an adverse inference against parties to a civil action refusing to testify on Fifth Amendment grounds. Id. at 1129 (citing United States v. A Single Family Residence, 803 F.2d 625, 629 n.4 (11th Cir. 1986)). Similarly, in Arango v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, 115 F.3d 922, 926 (11th Cir. 1997), the Eleventh Circuit explained that "the First Amendment + +does not forbid adverse inferences against civil litigants . . . who assert the privilege against self-incrimination." + +Here an adverse inference is entirely appropriate. In addition to Epstein's refusal to answer questions, there are strong circumstantial reasons for believing he is hiding his assets. As explained above, see Statement of Material Facts #1 tnrough #3, Epstein clearly has the means to hide his assets — he is a sophisticated financial advisor. And given that the sexual abuse lawsuits brought against Epstein threaten him with financial win — he has a clear motive for hiding his substantial assets. Finally, Epstein is currently on work release, running his financial affairs from his office — giving him the clear opportunity to make the necessary arrangements to move his assets to overseas or other unreachable locations. Thus, there is a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein) ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). The fact that this evidence is circumstantial rather than direct proof of the transfers is irrelevant, because "'circumstantial evidence is not less probative than direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable." United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994)). + +For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa II. JANE DOE IS ENTITELD TO THE PROTECTIONS OF THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFER ACT AS ADOPTED BY FLORIDA + +In light of Epstein's fraudulent asset transfers, Jane Doe is entitled to prejudgment remedies to protect her against Epstein's efforts to block her from satisfying the judgment she is likely to ultimately obtain in this case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 guarantees Jane Doe during the course of this suit "all remedies providing for seizure of person or property for the purpose of securing satisfaction of the judgment ultimately to be entered in the action" that are "available under the circumstances and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the court Is held." The Rule goes on to provide that "[t]he remedies thus available include arrest, attachment, garnishment, replevin, sequestration, and othe a§ponding or equivalent remedies, however designated and regardless of th by state procedure the remedy is ancillary to an action or must be obta. b n independent action." This "long-settled federal law provid[es] that in all a federal court , . . . state law is incorporated to determine the availability of 'rsejud ent remedies for the seizure of person or property to secure satisfaction of the judgment ultimately entered." v. Cascade Intern., Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1531 (11th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, under this Rule, this Court looks to Florida law to determine Jane Doe's rights to pre-judgment relief. + +vent fraudulent transfers of assets before judgment, Florida has adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.101 et seq. Under the Florida's Uniform Transfer Act (FUFTA), courts are broadly empowered to take action to block certain "fraudulent transfers" of assets. Jane Doe is accordingly entitled to invoke the remedies under this Act if Epstein is making "fraudulent transfers" of his assets. + +The Act defines a "fraudulent" transfer of assets as one made "[w]ith actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.105(1)(a). The FUFTA also contains a "quite broad" definition of "transfer." Nationsbank, N.A. v. Coastal Utilities, Inc., 814 So.2d 1227, 1230 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2002). It extends to "every mode, direct or indict, absolute or conditional, voluntary or involuntary, of disposing of or parting with an asset or an interest in an asset, and includes payment of money, release, lease, and creation of a lien or other encumbrance." Ha. Stat. Ann. § 726.102(12). This "broad definition includes 'every' mode ordisposing of an asset and does not limit the statute to direct transactions made by the debtor him/herself." Nationsbank, N.A. v. Coastal Utilities, Inc., 814 So.2d 1230. As noted above, Epstein is transferring his assets with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against him in this and other similar cases, see Statement of Material Facts #12, and therefore is plainly covered b ?tbthe Acts + +The FUFTA extends protections to "creditors" — such as Jane Doe, who is a "creditor" of Epstein's in e meaning of the Act. The FUFTA extends its protections not merely to nt creditors, but more widely to future creditors who have a "claim," including that has not yet been reduced to judgment. See Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.102 ) (defining a claim as a "right to payment, whether or not the right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured."); Fla. Stat. Ann. § (defining creditor protected by the act as "a person who has a claim"). See generally Freeman v. First Union Nat. Bank, 865 So.2d 1272, 1277 (Fla. 2004) (noting that the definition of + +claim is "broadly constructed" under the FUFTA). This means that "as is universally accepted, as well as settled in Florida, a 'claim' under the Act may be maintained even though contingent and not yet reduced to judgment." Freeman, 865 at 1277 (internal quotations omitted). In Florida, then, "'tort claimants are as fully protected against fraudulent transfers as holders of absolute claims.'" Id. at 1277 (quoting,Money v. Powell, 139 So.2d 702, 703 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 1962). Jane Doe is, of course, a tort claimant against Epstein. + +For all these reasons, Jane is entitled to the full protections of the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. + +#### III. UNDER THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFER ACT, JANE DOE IS ENTITLED TO THE REMEDIES OF APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF EPSTEIN'S ASSETS, FILE AN ACCOUNTING OF THOSE ASSETS WITJI tHE COURT, AND TO POST A \$15 MILLION BOND + +Under the Uniform Fraucjtfe§t nsfer Act, this Court is given broad powers to A, prevent fraudulent transfers k f ii.,assts. The remedies provided by the Act specifically include: + +- 1. An injunction against further disposition by the debtor .. . of the asset transferred . .. ., +- 2. Appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee; or +- 3. Any other relief the circumstances may require. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.108(c). + +Jane Doe seeks one of these specifically provided remedies — namely, appointment of a receiver to take charge of Epstein's assets. Appointment of a receiver will serve three important goals: first, if a receiver has control of Epstein's assets, Epstein's ability to further transfer those assets will be blocked; second, the receiver can provide an accounting of Epstein's assets, allowing Jane Doe (and the Court) to take whatever other action may be appropriate; and, third, the receiver can post a bond of \$15 million with the Court so that Jane Doe will have funds to satisfy any judgment that she might obtain. + +The Court should appoint a receiver to account for Epstein's assets. The appointment of a receiver is directly authorized by the FUFTA. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.108(c); see Freeman v. First Union Nat. Bank, 865 So.2d 1272, 1277 (Fla. 2004) (noting that appointment of a receiver is remedy provided by the FUFTA). A receiver is the only way to start to block further dissipation of assets — by, first, gaining control over Epstein's assets and then, second, making an accounting of what assets of Epstein's remain in this country or are otherwise subject to control by this Court. Given Epstein's Fifth Amendment invocations and other obstructions regarding any discovery concerning his assets, see Statement of Material Facts #14, it is currently impossible for Jane Doe to protect her interests in blocking Epstein's fraudulent transfers. Indeed, one of the other remedies specifically specified in the Act — "[a]n injunction against further disposition by the debtor . . . of the asset transferred" — is presumably unworkable given that there is no way to know what assets Epstein possesses, much less where he is transferring them to. Cf. Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Co-op Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co., L.L.C., 2007 WL 4482611 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (Marra, J.) (refusing to + +apply any heightened pleading requirements to UFTA claims "[g]iven this lack of access to information on the part of a plaintiff in a fraudulent transfer case"). Jane Doe therefore needs a receiver to account for Epstein's assets to the Court. + +The receiver should make a report to the Court regarding Epstein's assets so that Jane Doe can determine what additional further action is required. Fot example, Jane Doe might need to take action to set aside various transfers. B en w, it is clear that the receiver should take one additional step: Once a is appointed and accounts for Epstein's assets, the receiver should post a 5 m' lion bond on behalf of Epstein with the Clerk of the Court in order to sat judgment that Jane Doe might obtain in this case. + +A \$15 million bond is reasonable. Fi he can post a \$15 million bond without ncial or other difficulty. See Statement of Material Facts #13. Second, g egregious acts of sexual abuse Epstein 'ye \ Epstein's tremendous net worth, committed against Jane Doe (who was a minor at the time) — and the punitive damages claim present in this case — \$15 million is a reasonable bond amount given the nature of the judgment that Jane Doe is likely to obtain at trial. Jane Doe seeks more than \$50 million damages. See First Amended Complaint, ¶ 1. Her complaint alleges that Jeffrey Epstein had a sexual obsession for minor girls. Id. at ¶ 10. To satisfy that obsession, Epstein engaged in an elaborate scheme whereby his assistants recruited minor girls for the purpose of engaging in prostitution. Id. at ¶ 11. Her complaint explains that: + +Beginning in approximately February 2003 and continuing until approximately June 2005, the defendant coerced and enticed the impressionable, vulnerable, and economically deprived then minor [Jane + +Doe] in order to commit various acts of sexual misconduct against her. These acts included, but were not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and illegal sexual touching of the then minor [Jane Doe], sexual misconduct and masturbation of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in the presence of the then minor Plaintiff, and encouraging and coercing the then minor Plaintiff to become involved in prostitution. + +Id. at ¶ 18. Jane Doe finally notes that in June 2009, Epstein entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution, for which Defendant Epstein was sentenced to 18 months incarceration in Palm Beach County jail to be followed by 12 months community control (house arrest). Id. at ¶ 22. + +Jane Doe has propounded various d 'requests regarding these allegations to Jeffrey Epstein. It is noteworthY tRat Epstein has asserted a Fifth Amendment self-incrimination privilege to these requests, rather than provide answers. For example, Jane Doe has asked Epstein to admit that he committed sexual assault against Jane Doe when she was minor. Plaintiffs First Request for Admissions to Defendant Epstein 11. In response, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate himself. + +For all these reasons, directing the receiver to post a \$15 million bond on behalf of Epstein is reasonable under the circumstances. + +The UFTA "also grants the court equity powers to remedy . . . fraud." Invo Florida, Inc. v. Somerset Venturer, Inc., 751 So.2d 1263, 1267 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The FUFTA's provisions are "supplement[ed]" by "the principles of law and equity." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.111. It is well-settled that "[a]n equitable action requires equitable relief." Prince v. Tyler, 890 So.2d 246, 251 (Fla. 2004), and "equity will do what ought to + +be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe requests. + +Of course, in equity, the Court considers the relative positions of the two claimants. Here, Jane Doe has presented substantial claims of sexual abuse against her while a minor, while Epstein (who pled guilty to felony charges Involving such conduct) has taken the Fifth Amendment rather than answer questions about his sexual abuse of Jane Doe. If Jane Doe does not obtain the remedy that she is requesting, then Epstein may well be able to move all of his assets to unreachable locations, leaving her with a substantial tort claim and no possible way to satisfy it. On the other hand, appointing a receiver will not interfere with any legitimate interest of Epstein, particularly given his phenomenal wealth. + +When this Court proceeds in equity, it "will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy." Connell v. Mittendorf, 147 So.2d 169, 172 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 1962). This case cries out for the Court to intercede and take action to avoid allowing a confessed and wealthy sex offender from concealing his assets and depriving his victims — including Jane Doe — from satisfying any judgment that they may well obtain against him. A receiver with control over Epstein's assets is a modest and entirely appropriate step to take given Epstein's actions. + +For the consideration of the Court, a proposed order adopting these remedies is attached to this pleading. + +#### CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa CONCLUSION + +WHEREFORE, in view of the fraudulent transfers being made by Jeffrey Epstein to prevent Jane Doe from satisfying any judgment she might obtain in this case, the Court should appoint a receiver to take charge of Epstein's property and direct the receiver to provide the Court with an accounting of Epstein's assets and post a \$15 million bond to secure any potential judgment that Jane Doe might obtain In this case. + +DATED this 19th day of June, 2009. + +CG + +Respe bmitted, + +s/ Brad @si J. ROTHSTEIt NFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwardsArra-law.com + +And + +Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellpalaw.utah.edu + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 19, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing geperated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not, authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing. + +#### SERVICE LIST + +Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein + +United States District Court, Southern District of Florida + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. + +JgoIdbercier aqwcia.com + +Robert D. Critton, Esq. + +rcrittonabcIclaw.com + +Isidro Manual + +isidrociarcia bellsouth.net + +Jack • iph@searcvlaw.com + +Katherine Warthen Ezell + +KEzell@podhurst.com + +Michael James Pike + +MPike bciclaw.com + +Paul G. Cassell + +cassellpf&bcIclaw.com + +Richard Horace Willits + +lawyerswillitscd + +Robert C. Josefsberg + +riosefsberq a oodhurst.c + +Adam D. Horo + +ahorowitz sexabus attomev.com + +Stuart S. Mermelstein + +ssmf&sexabuseattornev.com + +William J. Berger + +wbercierfarra-law.com + +(5s + +#### AFFIDAVIT OF PAUL G. CASSELL, ESOUIRE + +1. I, Paul Cassell, have person knowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Utah since 1992. My office is located at the University of Utah College of Law, where I am a law professor. Along with other attorneys, I represent plaintiff Jane Doe in this matter. + +2. It appears that defendant Jeffrey EpsteSS, extremely wealthy individual. According to reputable pres his net worth is in the hundreds of millions of dollars — if not, ind ciikt.bi on dollars. See, e.g., New York Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over C weekend b Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionaires becam illionaire himself, left his estate on Little St. James Island, with its staff ofISZlerand its flamingo-stocked lagoon, boarded a private helicopter and flew to Florida. There, he turned himself in at the Palm Beach \ — Countyjail and began serving 18 months for soliciting prostitution."). According to the Wikipedia entry about Jeffrey Epstein, he is a billionaire and owner of a private island in the Virgin Island (Little St. James Island), and was a financial trader at Bear Steams. He then founded his own financial management firm, J. + +![](_page_82_Picture_4.jpeg) + +Epstein and Col, later called Financial Trust Co., located on his private island in the U.S. Virgin Island. He reportedly only took billionaire clients. • + +3. Other attorneys and I have made repeated efforts to fmd published information about defendant Jeffrey Epstein in general and his financi mgs in particular. The most detailed published source of information ab fendant Jeffrey Epstein that I have been able to locate is an article published in Vanity Fair by Vicky Vicky is a contribpting editor to Vanity Fair, a contributor to CNBC, and a weekly columnist on Evening Standard. S The article can be found in the internet at AS, http://vicicvward.com/wordpress/arc 4 + +4. According to the ani AS At air article, defendant Jeffrey Epstein became wealthy by managing ancial assets of other billionaires. He reportedly limited his cli those whose net worth was more than \$1 billion. Unlike other fund owever, Epstein kept all his deals and clients secret (with one exceptio billionaire Leslie Wexner — who Epstein claims was his mentor). He has great skills in trading in international currency markets, which helped him make money for himself and his clients. As a result, it is reasonable to infer that he has significant fmancial sophistication, including sophistication about the international transfer of financial instruments and other assets. + +5. According to the Vanity Fair article, defendant Jeffrey Epstein's real mentor was not Leslie Wexner, but Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who was federal prison for twenty years for bilking investors out of more aik th 50 million in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in American history. E isted Hoffenberg with (failed) takeover bids of Pan Americ o Airwaysand t Emery Air Freight. + +'S ) + +< e ' 6. According to the Vanity Faiti fkA' Sc i1 ,before .' working with Wexner and Hoffenberg, defendant Jeffrey Epstein worked with Beam Steams. He left the firm / / 7 very suddenly in 1981 after being questioned by S.E.C. investigators in an insider trading scandal involving several Italian and Swiss investors. + +7. According to the Vanity Fair article, Epstein recently owned (and thus may still own) a Boeing 727 with a trading room. + +8. Vicky published a follow-up note to her earlier article in May 2008. It can be found at http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/05/vicicy- + +n According to this note, rumors were circulating (to celebrities such as Dustin Hoffman, Alec Baldwin, and filmmaker Michael Mailer) that Epstein was moving all of his considerable assets to Israel. The note also indicated that, having written the earlier detailed article about Epstein, was now frequently viewed as an "expert" on Epstein. + +9. According to reputable press reports, Jeffrey Epst ' lOvelled internationally with Donald Trump, former President 13+ lin on ,and Prince Andrew. See, e.g., The Daily Mail, Prince Andr /..; Zlfonaire Friend is Accused of Preying on Girl of 14, Apr. 29, 2007, httll i dailymail.co.uk/news/article- ✓-N., 451372/Prince-Andrews-billionaire-frienSaccused-preying-gir1-14.html ("One of Prince Andrew's closest frien [ e y pstein] is being investigated by the FBI for allegedly paying under Cge gir s for tawdry sexual encounters."). It is therefore t reasonable to infer tha 4ias international contacts, including international financial con + +10. Approximately 25 civil suits have been filed in Florida state courts and Florida federal courts raising similar allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. These complaints seek damages comparable to those sought by Jane Doe in this case. Accordingly, Epstein has currently pending against him lawsuits seeking more than \$1 billion in damages. Even given his great wealth, it appears that the lawsuits against him could well lead to his financial ruin, unless he is able to conceal his assets so that the plaintiffs in these cases are unable to reach them. + +11. Since his guilty plea in state court, he has been incarcerated e Palm Beach County Detention facility. I have been advised, however, t t e has currently been allowed out on a "work release" program, w Lde...) orks at managing his financial interests. + +12. Because of his overseas contac "C, \Ier , aintiff attorneys and I have been greatly concerned that Epstein r attbmpt to transfer many of his assets overseas with the intent to def ji gment that might be entered against him. I have also received repo am attempting to substantiate, that Epstein is transferring his assets f the country at this time with the intent to make it impossible for a Doe and other plaintiffs to satisfy any significant judgment that they ms against him. In light of these reports, other attorneys and I have propounded the requests for admission regarding fraudulent asset transfers discussed in the pending motion. + +13. In this case, Epstein has blocked all discovery regarding the current location of his assets and recent fraudulent transfers of his assets, by asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. With other attorneys working on this case (and related cases), I have wanted to obtain direct, first hand information regarding Epstein's financial dealings, but have been bloc a for doing so by Epstein. Therefore, I have been forced to rely on re u press reports for information about these dealings. + +14. In the similar sexual abuse lawsuits I t Epstein, other plaintiffs attorneys have advised that Epstein has b cked all discovery regarding his finances with Fifth Amendment irr4 ti or other interposed obstructions. + +I swear the foregoing to be truthful under the penalty of perjury. + +FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. + +![]()Paul G. Cassell + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAMOHNSON + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +#### PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, by and through her undersigned counsel, and files this her First Request for Admissions to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests said Defendant admit or deny the following facts, accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: eD llTIONS + +The term "you" means and refers to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +#### ADMISSIONS + +- 1. Your net worth is greater than \$10 million. +- 2. Your net worth is greater than \$50 million. +- 3. Your net worth is greater than \$100 million. +- 4. Your net worth is greater than \$500 million. + +![](_page_89_Picture_14.jpeg) + +- 5. Your net worth is greater than SI billion. +- 6. Since being incarcerated you have, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons), conveyed money or assets in an attempt to insulate or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits filed against you. + - 7. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in the Caribbean. +- 8. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in foreign countries. +- 9. In the last 2 years you have transferred assets and/or money. financial instruments to countries outside the United States. + - 10. You have provided financial support to the modeling enc fC2. + - II. You committed sexual assault against Plaintiff, + - 12. You committed battery against Plaintiff. + - 13. You digitally penetrated Plaintiff wh elks a minor. +- 14. You offered Plaintiff more mgppy gent upon her having sex with you or giving you oral sex. + - 15. You intended to harriF'iainti when you committed these sexual acts against her. +- 16. You knew Plaintiff was under the age of 16 when you sexually touched and fondled her. +- 17. You intend to hire investigators to intimidate and harass Plaintiff during this litigation. +- 18. You were engaged in the act of trafficking minors across state or country borders for the purposes of sex or prostitution between 2000 and the present. + - 19. You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitute and remaining in prostitution. + +- A. Procuring a minor for the purpose of prostitution as defined in F.S. 796.03 +- B. Battery as defined by Florida Statutes +- C. Sexual Battery + +21. You are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts. + +22. You are making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against you in this or similar cases. + +23. You currently have the ability to post a bond of \$15 million to satisfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been provided via United States mail to the wing addressees, this wday of March, 2009. + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & olema2f, LLP 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 rcrit@bc1claw.c.om mpike@bciclaw.com I + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esquire Atterbtny, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 jageso@bellsouth.net + +Michael R. Tein, Esquire +██████ Tein, P.L. +3059 Grand Avenue +Suite 340 +Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 +[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com) + +Respectfully Submitted, + +THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD ██████ & +ASSOCIATES, LLC + +By: + +![]()Paul G. Cassell +Attorney for Plaintiff +Pro Hac Vice +332 S. 1400 E. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Telephone: 801-585-5202 +Facsimile: 801-585-6833 +E-Mail: [cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +O 'S JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +#### 4 1CC) DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS (dated 03/23/091 + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ('EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, serves his response to Plaintiff's First Request for Admission, dated March 23, 2009. + +1. In response, tr&dant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I Intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys II counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +2. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my + +![](_page_93_Picture_13.jpeg) + +attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +3. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse Inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +4. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attomeys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +5. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to + +Page 3 + +effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +6. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +7. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representatiOn. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +8. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I Intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States + +Page 4 + +Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +9. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +10. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +11. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would + +Page 5 + +unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +12. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +13. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +14. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +Page 6 + +15. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Iment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +16. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I Intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse Inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +17. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +18. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my + +Page 7 + +attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +19. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth =Vents as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +20. In response to 20 A, B, and C, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +21. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to + +Page 8 + +effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +22. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +23. In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein, I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. + +## Certificate of Service + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the\_Vregoing has been sent via U.S. Mall and facsimile to the following addressees this rday of Mav, 2009. + +Brad [REDACTED], Esq. +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler +401 East Las Olas Boulevard +Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-522-3456 +Fax: 954-527-8663 +[bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com) +*Counsel for Plaintiff* + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +561-659-8300 +561-835-8691 Fax +[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net) +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Paul G. Cassell, Esq. +*Pro Hac Vice* +332 South 1400 E, Room 101 +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +801-585-5202 +801-585-6833 Fax +[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) +*Co-counsel for Plaintiff* + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]() + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO: 08-CV-80119- MARRAL + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant OS + +JANE DOE NO. 3, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-CAitRA/ + +V + +JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 6. CASE NO: RAi + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 7, + +Plaintiff 7 4," + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +\Defendant + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRA + +C.M.A., + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE, CASE NO. 8-CV-80893-M + +Plaintiff, + +Vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. + +Defendant. + +DOE II, 6ASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA I + +Plaintiff + +VS. + +ief endants. + +JEFF , PSTEIN, et al. + +JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRa + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRa + +C 9 + +#### ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND DIRECTING RECEIVER TO SECURE ASSETS FOR POSTING OF A BOND + +For the reasons provided in Jane Doe's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge Property of Epstein, and for Posting of a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, it is adjudged: + +1. The defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is hereby ordered not to make any further\_transfers of assets that are fraudulent, as defined in the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.101 et seq. Epstein also shall not transfer any of his assets outside the fifty states of the United States or the District of Columbia without first seeking leave of court, after providing notice and an opportunity to be heard bypplaintiff Jane Doe. + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +2. is appointed as receiver of all the real property, good, chattels, moneys, financial instruments, stocks, or other assets of any type of defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and all the rents, income, interest, and profits from them, all called the "property" in this order, and the receiver is directed to immediately enter upon, receive and take complete possession of all of the property and the rents, income and profits. + +3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and his servants, agentsmployees To gents are ordered to deliver immediately to the receiver all of thet pe S and they, and each of them, are enjoined from interfering in any way with the receiver or with any of the property until the further order of this court, + +4. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and his servants, agents and employees are further ordered to deliver to the receiver or his representative, all keys or combinations to locks required to open or gain access to any of the property and all money deposited in any bank to, the credit of the defendant, and any other money, financial instruments, or things of value of the defendant wherever they may be. + +5. The receiver is granted all the usual, necessary and incidental powers for the purpose of managing and maintain the property, including the power to appoint sudh agents as the receiver considers necessary to enable the receive to perform the receivers duties. + +6. The receiver shall, within 60 days of this order, if sufficient assets are available, post a \$15 million bond on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein with the Clerk of the Court to secure any potential judgment the plaintiff might obtain. The + +receiver shall also by that time file an accounting of all significant assets of Jeffrey Epstein with the Court. The receiver shall be entitled to reasonable compensation and coverage of expenses, as approved by the Court. + +DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2009. + +A + +KENNETH A. MARRA° United States Dist gc + +Copies furnished to: All counsel of record + +**APP.6** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRa✓ + +JANE DOE NO. 2, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +I + +Related cases: + +08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 + +C + +This cause is before the Court u t • ffJane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer a ppointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165). Defendant Jeffrey stein IP a response in opposition to the motion (DE 198), and Plaintiff filed a reply (D 1 e motion is now fully briefed and ripe for review. + +P1 otion argues that Defendant is fraudulently transferring his assets with the specific in t to defeat any judgment that might be entered against him in this and other similar cases. Plaintiff therefore seeks an order enjoining Defendant from fraudulent transfers of his assets, appointing a receiver to take charge of Defendant's property, and requiring Defendant to post a \$15 million dollar bond against any potential judgment in this case. + +The relief sought by Plaintiff is injunctive and, essentially, amounts to a prejudgment writ of attachment. v. Cascade Intern., Inc. 21 F.3d 1520, 1530 (11th Cir. 1994) (vacating district court's preliminary injunction freezing defendant's assets). "No relief of this character has been thought justified in the long history of equity jurisprudence." De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 222-23 (1945). + +"Preliminary injunctive relief freezing a defendant's assets in order to es with which to satisfy a potential judgment for money damages is simply n ate exercise of a federal district court's authority." =, 21 F.3d at 153 "[i]t is entirely settled by a long and unbroken line of Florida cases that in an at law for money damages, there is simply no judicial authority for an order requirin controversy into the registry of the court ... or ind defendant's unrestricted assets prior to the Realty Assoc., Ltd. v. Mladen, 511 So it of the amount in straint upon the use of a ent." Id. at 1531, gtAtgt Konover (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). + +In Florida, an injunction his assets prior to the conclusto So.2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d tered to prevent a party from using or disposing of egal action. Briceno v. Bryden Investments, Ltd., 973 8). See also SME Racks, Inc. v. Sistemas Mecanicos Para, Electroni S. ed.Appx. 502 (111° Cir. 2007) (affirming district's court's denial of prelimin on to freeze defendant's assets); Proctor v. Eason,651 So.2d 1301, 1301-02 (Fla. 2d D 1995) (Defendant not required to deposit funds in court registry prior to final judgment where Plaintiff failed to show unavailability of an adequate remedy at law and the likelihood of irreparable harm, two elements essential to entry of an injunction); Lawhon v. Mason, 611 So.2d 1367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (quashing trial court order requiring defendant to + +give plaintiffs ten days notice prior to the transfer of any assets in excess of \$500). + +Additionally, as the Eleventh Circuit explained in + +In actions at law, plaintiffs in Florida possess an adequate, exclusive prejudgment remedy for the sequestration of assets under the attachment statute, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 76.04-.05 (West 1987), provided that they can satisfy the enumerated statutory grounds for relief. Accordingly, the use of injunctive relief as a substitute for the remedy of prejudgment attachment, with its attendant safeguards, is improper. + +21 F.3d at 1531 (emphasis added). Here, Plaintiff did not move to amend hemp laint to allege a claim under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act ("FUFTA" t. § 726.101, et Rather, she filed the present motion for injunctive relief. Even d moved to amend her complaint, it is certainly not clear that she could meet t r it statutory elements. + +Plaintiff's motion is premised on the contention that r y Tis fraudulently transferring his + +(assets. However, Plaintiff's motion is entirely evidence of Defendant's alleg2di + +fraudulent transfers. The Court declines e that Defendant is fraudulently transferring + +upon by Plaintiff. Plaintiffs supplemental filing) assets based upon the adverse inf + +(garding the titles of aeproxi tely of Defendant's vehicles is clearly de minimis) + +(particularly in light of PI repeated characterization of Defendant as a "billionaire." + +Based upo a foregoing, it is hereby + +#### ORD D ADJUDGED that + +&#x27;Fraudulent transfer claims under Florida law arise under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act ("FUFTA"), Fla. Stat. § 726.101, et seq.. FUFTA, as set forth in Florida Statute § 726.105, provides the substantive requirements that must be pled to state a valid fraudulent transfer claim. Nationsbank, N.A. v. Coastal Utilities. Inc., 814 So.2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2002). The plaintiff must show that "(1) there was a creditor to be defrauded; (2) a debtor intending fraud; and (3) a conveyance of property which could have been applicable to the payment of the debt due." Id. + +(1) PlaintiffJane Doe's Motion for leave to Provide Recently-obtained Deposition + +Testimony and Affidavit (DE 386 in 08-80119) is GRANTED. + +(2) (PlaintiffJane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets,) + +(Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million + +(Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165 in 08-80119) is DENIED.) + +DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Bea + +Florida, this 5th day of November, 2009. + +Copies to: all counsel of record KENNETH A. MARRC) United States Di dge + +# **APP.7** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_114_Picture_3.jpeg) + +Rothstein Rcsenfeldt Adler Attorneys at Law + +July 22, 2009 + +Via Facsmile: + +305-931-0877 Adam D. Horowitz, Esquire Stuart elstein, Esquire 561-832-7137 Isidro Manuel Esquire 305-931-0877 Jeffrey Marc erman, Esquire 305-358-2382 Katherine Earthen Ezell, .Esquire bert C. Josefsberg, Esquire, 561-684-5707 Jaok Esquire + +Bradley J. Direct Dial: -7266 bedwards@mt-law.com + +cos + +Dear Counsel, ? S + +We have recently reedy olicettor, positions "' from Adam Horowitz for several witnesses and the. lever from Jack indicating tm intent to take others. We intend to Cross-Notice each deposition. Additionally, we intend to set the following other individuals for video deposition: + +- 1. Dona (West Palm Beach) +- 2. Glen (West Paha Beach) +- 3. Ghia axwell (New York) +- 4. Sara (New York) +- S. Leslie 1 caner (Ohio) +- 6. Bill Clinton (D.C.) +- 7. Paula-Heil.-(New York) +- 8. Jean -Luc Bruhel (New York) + +|

Δ π EXHIBIT 3

Deponent McGlavin

Date 2/23/18 Rptr. Cont

| | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +|

DEPOSITOR

| | + +Ropry Ta Lee ohs City Centro • 401 East Lis CWo Soavam - auIte 1950 • Fort Lnudordate, Fbdda 33x01 TelepOonc (064) 622.3460 •Fax (951)527.0603 BOCA RATON • PORT LAUDERDALE • MIA M • NEW YORK CRY • TALLAHASSEE • WASHINGTON D.C. • WESiT PALM BENCH + +July 22, 2009 +Page 2 of 3 + +We will choose dates that have not already been occupied by other depositions already set in this case. If you would like to be included in the scheduling of these depositions, please provide me with your scheduling secretaries' names and e-mail addresses. If any of you do not need to be consulted regarding the scheduling of these depositions, please advise me of that as well. + +Very truly yours, +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER + +![]()![]()NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.8** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +L.M., CASE NO: 09-CV-81092-Cohn-Seltzer + +Plaintiff + +FILED by VT D.C. ELECTRONIC vs. 440; 4,2009 TETE M. LARIMORE LEM( U.S. DIST. CT. O. OF FLA. • MIAMI + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +/ + +#### COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL + +Plaintiff, L.M., hereby sues the Defendant, Jeffrey cps y in, and states as follows: + +- 1. At all times material to this cause of act , rc .., was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. +- 2. This Complaint is brought un asTic name to protect the identity of iic\_ L.M., because this Complaint make s nsitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then-minor. +- 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a mansion located at 358 El BriIlo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. +- 4. At all tangs materials to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult mal bo in 1953. ndant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the State of Florida. This is substantiated by the residence that he maintains at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida where he spends the majority of his time, and intentions to remain at that address permanently are further evidenced by his statements to the Court during + +his State Plea colloquy on June 30, 2008, case number 06CF009454AMB, taken before the Honorable Judge Dale Pucillo, wherein he indicated that after his release from the Palm Beach County Jail he intends to reside permanently at his home at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida, and he plans to work in West Palm Beach, Florida as well. + +6. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. L.M. seeks damages in excess of 1 million dollars. + +7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District. + +#### STATEMENT OF FASTS + +8. Upon information and belief,, sl'Ne i fendant, Jeffrey Epstein, has demonstrated a sexual preference and otrAiont t or minor girls. + +9. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epall developed a plan, scheme, and criminal enterprise that included an elaborate system wherein the then-minor L.M. was brought to the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's residence by the Defendant's employees, recruiters, and assistants. When the assistants and employees left the then-minor L.M. (and, on some occasions, other minor girls) alone in a room at the Defendant's mansion, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, himself would appear, remove his clothing, and direct the then-minor L.M. to remove her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including, but not limited to, masturbation, touching of the then minor Plaintiffs sexual organs, coercing or forcing the then-minor L.M. to perform oral sex on him, using vibrators or sexual toys on the then-minor L.M., coercing the then-minor L.M. into sexual acts with himself or others, and digitally penetrating the then-minor L.M.. He would then pay L.M. for engaging in this sexual activity. + +10. L.M. was first brought to the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's mansion in 2002 when she was a fourteen-year old in middle school. + +11. The then-minor L.M. was a vulnerable child without adequate parental support at all times material to this Complaint. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier with a lavish home, significant wealth, and a network of assistants and employees, used his resources and his influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitive behavior. + +12. Beginning in approximately August 2002 and continuing until approximately the end of October 2005, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, repeatedly coerced, induced and/or enticed the impressionable, vulnerable, and economically deprived then-minor L.M. to commit various acts of sexual misconduct and sexually abused L.M. These acts included, but were not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and illegal sexual touching of the then-minor L.M.,(forcing the then-minor L.M. into oral sex), sexual misconduct and masturbation of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in the presence of the then-minor L.M., handling and fondling of the then-minor L.M.'s sexual organs for the purpose of masturbation, and encouraging the then-minor L.M. to become involved in prostitution; Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed, and conspired with others to commit, numerous criminal sexual offenses against the then minor Plaintiff including, but not limited to, sexual battery, solicitation of prostitution, coercing a minor into a life of prostitution, and lewd and lascivious assaults upon the person of the then-minor L.M. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein knowingly transported L.M. and other minors in interstate commerce with the intent that the L.M. engage in prostitution and in other sexual activity for which he and others could be charged with criminal offenses. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein also knowingly used means of interstate commerce to knowing persuade and induce minors, including L.M., to engage in prostitution and other sexual activity for which he and others could be charged with criminal offenses. + +13. In addition to the direct sexual abuse and molestation of the then-minor L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, instructed, coerced and otherwise induced the thenminor L.M. to bring him numerous other minor girls (some as young at 12 years old) for the purposes of further satisfying his deviant sexual attraction to minors and for purposes of prostitution. On information and belief, Epstein sexually abused hundreds of minor girls through his recruiting system. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used his money, wealth and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the thenminor L.M. to bring him these other minor girls for purposes of prostitution and in exchange for money. This influence led the then-minor L.M. away from the life of a middle school aged child and into a delinquent lifestyle. This conduct also involved transporting L.M.. and other minors in interstate commerce and using means of interstate commerce, to persuade and induce L.M. and others to engage in prostitution and in other sexual activity for which he and others could be charged with criminal offenses. + +14. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this Complaint, knew and should have known of L.M.'s minority. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this Complaint, knew and should have know of the minority of the other girls he was sexually abusing + +15. The acts referenced above in paragraphs 10 through 14, committed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, against the then-minor Plaintiff L.M. were committed in violation of numerous State criminal statutes condemning the sexual exploitation of minor children, prostitution and prostitution-related offenses, sexual performances by a child, lewd and lascivious assaults, sexual battery, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those criminal offenses outlined in Chapters 794, 800, 827 and 847 of the Florida Statutes, as well as those designated in Florida Statutes §796.03, §796.07, §Z .s96, 045, §796.04, §796.09, §39.01, and §827.04. + +16. The acts reference above • 4ar phs 10 through 15, committed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, against the s thin-Minor Plaintiff L.M. were committed in violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +17. The crimes committed against L.M. by Epstein were committed, on average, four times per month from the beginning of August 2002 through the end of October 2005, the exact dates being unknown to L.M.. + +18. In June 2008, after investigations by the Palm Beach Police Department, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in the Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against Plaintiff and, as such, must admit liability unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101. In this action, Plaintiff hereby e u vely seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. JJ + +19. As a condition of his plea, and in ASWp or the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant, Jeffrey Epsteirttn merous federal offenses, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more: no less." Plaintiff L.M. is covered by this paragraph and entitled to rights under this paragraph. + +20. The defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged in this Complaint, and must effectively admit liability to the Plaintiff, L.M., including admitting liability for all counts enumerated in this Complaint. Plaintiff L.M. is entitled to damages, as further alleged below, including damages as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended by Pub. L. 109-248, Title VII, § 707(b) and (c), 120 Stat. 650. + +#### COUNT 1 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### August 2002 - Incident 1 + +21. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +22. On or about August 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +23. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-mino A plaintiff tti L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., it 'n 'the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., hN ""u Si f, a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, a ASIos of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature acti he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. (k) + +24. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 2 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### August 2002 — Incident 2 + +25. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +26. On or about August 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +27. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, lo's Qdignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendI b and co nal way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +28. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 3 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6.2255 + +#### August 2002 - incident 3 + +29. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +30. On or about August 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +31. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss t pacify to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the pl ., will continue to suffer these \e losses in the future. + +32. Wherefore, the plaint' ., mands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## COUNT 4 < \ + +A + +O + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### "at""' August 2002 — Incident 4 + +33. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 34. On or about August 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +35. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +36. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 5 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2002 — Incident 1 + +37. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +38. On or about September 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated, in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +39. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +40. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., dema uHgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 6 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### September 2002 — Incident 2 + +41. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +42. On or about September 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +43. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to rn come in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injurie rmanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +44. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 7 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### September 2002 — Incident 3 + +45. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +46. On or about September 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +47. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +48. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 8 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### September 2002 - Incident 4 + +49. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +50. On or about September 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +51. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +52. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 9 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### October 2002 — Incident 1 + +53. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 54. On or about October 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +55. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +56. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and furthe \ relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all J.14 ' /.' s iable as of right by a . + +## COUNT.\14/ c) + +### Cause of Action Pursue N8 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2002 - Incident 2 + +57. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +58. On or about October 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +59. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +60. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 11 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### October 2002 — Incident 3 + +61. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +62. On or about October 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +63. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +64. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attomey's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 12 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2002 - Incident 4 + +65. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +66. On or about October 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit ONl conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, a spo of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exl ion enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +67. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature a W eplaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +r 14/ 68. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorneyf es, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 4 d t re by demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 13 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 2255 + +#### November 2002 - Incident 1 + +69. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +70. On or about November 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +71. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +72. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of rid. a jury. + +#### COUNT 14 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2002 - Incident 2 + +73. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +74. On or about November 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation etprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those a L.M. is re a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. nated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +75. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +76. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## < \\., COUNT 15 + +A + +## OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2002 — Incident 3 + +77. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 78. On or about November 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +79. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, kasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Eps ntrolling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +80. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 16 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 4 " Alt - + +1.. Cr 81. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +#### November 2002 - Incident 4 + +82. On or about November 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex traffic■ **of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore(a .%im of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, a s cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Sec the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government.** + +**83. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past** + +suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M.; continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +84. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demarASS4 gments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 17 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### December 2002 — Incident 1 + +85. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +86. On or about December 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +87. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +88. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 18 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2002 - Incident 2 + +89. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +90. On or about December 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +91. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +92. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 19 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2002 — Incident 3 + +93. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 94. On or about December 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +95. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her prcy III other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, dating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a m The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +96. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 20 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2266 + +#### December 2002 - Incident 4 + +97. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +98. On or about December 2002, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +99. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +100. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all sc' C ,)sltiiable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT t\" + +#### Cause of Action PursuS to 8 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2003 — Incident 1 + +101. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +102. On or about January 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +103. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +104. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 22 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2003 — Incident 2 + +105. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +106. On or about January 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +107. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +108. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 23 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2003 — Incident 3 + +109. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +110. On or about January 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +111. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature a eplaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these jg . losses in the future. + +( 14/ 112. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attomey; es, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 24 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2003 — Incident 4 + +113. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +114. On or about January 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +115. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +116. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 25 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### February 2003 — Incident 1 + +117. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 118. On or about February 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitatiorterVrises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crim tnated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is re e a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +119. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss t capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the pl will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +S r 120. Wherefore, the plaintiff,T.M., \ mands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## < COUNT 26 + +#### A\$ C) Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### February 2003 — Incident 2 + +121. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +122. On or about February 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +123. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +124. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 27 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 s + +#### February 2003 - Incident 3 + +an 125. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +126. On or about February 2003, the exact date being unknown to L M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +127. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past + +suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M, wi continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +128. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demiSju gments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 28 + +#### Gaut of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### February 2003 - Incident 4 + +129. iff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +131n or about February 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +131. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +132. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 29 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### March 2003 - Incident 1 + +133. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +134. On or about March 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +135. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +136. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 30 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### March 2003 — Incident 2 + +137. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +138. On or about March 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +139. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are perTanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in th + +erefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 31 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +#### March 2003 - Incident 3 + +141. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +142. On or about March 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and + +enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor + +children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, + +as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, + +Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +143. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, + +United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past + +suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional + +distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with + +defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +144. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all jury. glsc i as of right by a + +#### COUNT Cr ilJNTA,. + +## Cause of Action PursuStr)r 4 8 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### March 2003 — Incident 4 + +145. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +146. On or about March 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +147. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, LM., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +148. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 33 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### April 2003 — Incident 1 + +149. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +150. On or about April 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but t limited to, those crimes /-- designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 24 2N, b § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enu e Na I, i18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against t ndant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +151. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and vfIll'i the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, .ical trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-es ss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +152. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 34 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### April 2003 — Incident 2 + +153. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and ■leges **paragraphs 1 through 20 above.** + +**154. On or about April 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this** + +Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. losses in the future. ( 14/ and proper, nd reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT 35 Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 April 2003 — Incident 3 157. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +155. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these + +156. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorneys fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just + +158. On or about April 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendaq rey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agr '''' e tween the Defendant, Jeffrey .7 ' Epstein, and the United States Governm .\,, + +c 159. As a direct and proximate res t of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +160. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 36 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### April 2003 — Incident 4 + +161. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +162. On or about April 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +163. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss o i v) . .... ' \ tc capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the pl t , ., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +164. Wherefore, the plaintiff ,T.M., S \ emands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 37 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +#### May 2003 - Incident 1 + +165. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +166. On or about May 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of + +numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. AV + +167. As a direct and proximate result of cfenses ) enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and aloss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +168. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 38 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 s + +#### May 2003 - Incident 2 + +169. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +170. On or about Mayl 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including aviolation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +171. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past + +suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., wijj continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +172. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demarSti gments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 39 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### May 2003 - Incident 3 + +17 tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about May 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual + +conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of + +visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation + +enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes + +designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is + +therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as + +such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this + +Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey + +Epstein, and the United States Government. + +175. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological uses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity ncome in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These capacity injuries armanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +176. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 40 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### May 2003 - Incident 4 + +177. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +178. On or about May 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +179. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +180. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands jud nts against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at I /1 inimum amount provided .h e' c by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other n relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial bykSIn alt issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 41 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 + +## June 2003 — Incident 1 + +181. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +182. On or about June 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +183. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are perract in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in th + +1erefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 42 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2003 — Incident 2 + +185. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +186. On or about June 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +187. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +188. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and furthe relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all able as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 43 + +# Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2003 — Incident 3 + +189. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +190. On or about June 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +191. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, LM., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered aloss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and aloss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +192. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 44 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +#### June 2003 — Incident 4 + +193. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +194. On or about June 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +195. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +196. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 45 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2003 - Incident 1 + +197. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +198. On or about July 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this + +Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +199. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature aA'.. d he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +200. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, eereby nc demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 46 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2003 - Incident 2 + +201. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +202. On or about July 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +203. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +204. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 47 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 + +#### July 2003 — Incident 3 + +205. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +206. On or about July 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +207. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +208. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 48 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2003 — Incident 4 + +209. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +210. On or about July 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of + +numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement bV the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +211. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +212. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 49 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2003 — Incident 1 + +C.) 213. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +214. On or about August 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +215. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M,, wild continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +216. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., dernar iu gments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 50 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2003 - Incident 2 + +217. t1 tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about August 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +219. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +220. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 51 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2003 — Incident 3 + +221. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +222. On or about August 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +223. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +224. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, ;S i AS" Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at I s the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other" f r relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by' Sin a iissues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 52 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### August 2003 - Incident 4 + +225. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 226. On or about August 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +227. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +228. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 53 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2003 — Incident 1 + +229. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +230. On or about September 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +231. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +232. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all i N u s triable as of right by a jury. + +#### NT\ COU + +#### Cause of Action Pursuait-to 8 U.S.C. 8 2255 + +#### September 2003 — Incident 2 + +233. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +234. On or about September 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +235. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +236. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 55 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. fi 2255 + +#### September 2003 — Incident 3 + +237. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +238. On or about September 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2 3 a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offens s hn T rated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action again ASIef Ndant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +239. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and wilt in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +240. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 56 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### September 2003 — Incident 4 + +241. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +242. On or about September 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +243. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature a ,q e ..\_ plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +t 244. Wherefore, the C laintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorneys fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 4nd reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 57 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2003 — Incident 1 + +245. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +246. On or about October 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +247. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, losa Vgnity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendan , Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and c nal way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +248. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 58 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +## October 2003 — Incident 2 + +249. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +250. On or about October 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +251. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +252. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +<\ + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### COUNT 59 + +#### October 2003 - Incident 3 + +253. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +254. On or about October 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +255. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +256. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 60 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2003 — Incident 4 + +257. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +258. On or about October 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +259. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.MJe jI continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +260. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., dernartj dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 61 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### November 2003 — Incident 1 + +26 tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +2 n or about November 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +263. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +264. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 62 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### November 2003 — Incident 2 + +265. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +266. On or about November 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +267. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +268. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at Isil s the , minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such otherA' ' Ilit) r relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by 'Ssn tissues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 63 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2003 — Incident 3 + +269. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 270. On or about November 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +271. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +272. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 64 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2003 — Incident 4 + +273. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +274. On or about November 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +275. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +276. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just cc and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all • i able as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT \ v + +#### Cause of Action Pursuaf\*atto '13 U.S.C. \$ 2255 + +#### December 2003 — Incident 1 + +277. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +278. On or about December 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +279. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +280. Whercre, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey E s %•r compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by la vise , y's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 66 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### December 2003 - Incident 2 + +281. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +282. On or about December 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +283. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +284. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 67 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +#### December 2003 — Incident 3 + +285. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 286. On or about December 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +287. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature ' 'Z .he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +,A ) 288. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attomeWs4cs, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and prop , ereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. miL. COUNT 68 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +## December 2003 — Incident 4 + +289. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +290. On or about December 2003, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +291. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +292. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 69 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### January 2004 — Incident 1 + +293. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +294. On or about January 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +295. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her it perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +296. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby, demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 70 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2004 — Incident 2 + +297. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 298. On or about January 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +299. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +300. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 71 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### January 2004 — Incident 3 + +301. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +302. On or about January 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +303. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M" will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +304. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demaiti dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 72 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2004 - Incident 4 + +30k. iff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about January 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +307. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological eases. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to am ncome in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injurie rmanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +308. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 73 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +## February 2004 - Incident 1 + +309. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +310. On or about February 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +311. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +312. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 74 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +## February 2004 - Incident 2 + +313. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +314. On or about February 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +315. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +316. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 75 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### February 2004— Incident 3 + +317. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +318. On or about February 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +319. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +320. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all I' t 'able as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT% \" + +#### Cause of Action Pursuadt t 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### February 2004 — Incident 4 + +321. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +322. On or about February 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +323. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +324. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 77 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### March 2004 — Incident 1 + +325. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +326. On or about March 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +327. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +328. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## COUNT 78 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +## March 2004 — Incident 2 + +329. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +330. On or about March 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +331. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature StIthe plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +332. Wherefore, th aintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's4cs, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and prop r, = nd ereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## COUNT 79 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### March 2004 — Incident 3 + +333. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +334. On or about March 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +335. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +336. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 80 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### March 2004 — Incident 4 + +337. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +338. On or about March 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +339. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +340. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 81 + +S + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### April 2004 — Incident 1 + +341. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +342. On or about April 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of + +numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement b n the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +343. As a direct and proximate result Of tflIk. enses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional ,v of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psyc gi I expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psycho I expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +344. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 82 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### April 2004 — Incident 2 + +345. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +346. On or about April 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +347. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M" wl continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +348. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., der\*tj dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 83 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \$ 2255 + +#### April 2004 - Incident 3 + +tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about April 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual + +conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +351. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expices. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity ncome in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries a 4 ermanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +352. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 84 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### April 2004 — Incident 4 + +353. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +354. On or about April 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +355. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +356. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 85 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### May 2004— Incident 1 + +357. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +358. On or about May 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including aviolation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation + +enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +359. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +360. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 86 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### May 2004 — Incident 2 + +361. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +362. On or about May 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +363. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +364. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all i>3syes triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 8/ + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### May 2004 - Incident 3 + +365. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +366. On or about May 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is + +therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +367. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, LM., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +368. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 88 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### May 2004 — Incident 4 + +369. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +370. On or about May 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +371. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +372. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 89 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### June 2004 — Incident 1 + +373. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +374. On or about June 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +375. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature 4 ..the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +376. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 90 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### June 2004 - Incident 2 + +377. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +378. On or about June 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +379. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +380. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 91 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2004 — Incident 3 + +381. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +382. On or about June 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +383. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +384. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +## < COUNT 92 + +#### A\S Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### June 2004 — Incident 4 + +385. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 386. On or about June 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreeme t between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government + +387. As a direct and proximate resu me s1 th , enses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being mi ed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +388. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 93 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \$ 2255 s + +#### July 2004 - Incident 1 + +389. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +390. On or about July 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including aviolation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning'the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +391. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.NJ. wilj continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +392. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demarSkj dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 94 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2004 — Incident 2 + +39g. tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about July 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual + +conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +395. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological em4ces. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity injuriet'Mermanent in losses in the future. ncome in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these + +396. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 95 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § nss + +#### July 2004 — Incident 3 + +397. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +398. On or about July 2004, the exact date being unknown to I...M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +399. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +400. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands ju Vg ts against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at t minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other ti r relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by(enlif issues triable as of right by a jury. A- 5 , + +#### COUNT 96 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### July 2004 — Incident 4 + +401. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +402. On or about July 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation + +enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +403. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +404. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 97 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2004 — Incident 1 + +405. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +406. On or about August 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +407. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +408. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all: cc s s triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 9i\" - + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. fi 2255 + +#### August 2004 — Incident 2 + +409. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +410. On or about August 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +411. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +412. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 99 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2004 - Incident 3 + +413. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +414. On or about August 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +415. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +416. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 100 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2004 - Incident 4 + +417. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +418. On or about August 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +419. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +420. Wherefore, th laintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, @nd reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 101 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### September 2004 — Incident 1 + +421. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +422. On or about September 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +423. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +427. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +428. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 103 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2004 — Incident 3 + +429. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +430. On or about September 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +431. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, L vasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Eps ontrolling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +432. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 104 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2004 — Incident 4 + +(Th 433. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +434. On or about September 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex traffic. of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +435. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M,, w.11 continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +436. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., dernan dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 105 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +( S' V 437. tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about October 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +#### October 2004 — Incident 1 + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +439. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, foss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +440. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided + +by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 106 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### October 2004 — Incident 2 + +441. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +442. On or about October 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +443. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +444. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and proper, and hereby demands trial by/ScyStm inimum amount provided relief as this Court deems just issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 107 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2004 - Incident 3 + +445. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +446. On or about October 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +447. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +448. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 108 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2004 — Incident 4 + +449. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +450. On or about October 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +451. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +452. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 109 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant toS U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2004 - Incident 1 + +453. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +454. On or about November 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +455. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plainti S .M., ,\_ has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future) nd a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +456. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 110 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2004 — Incident 2 + +457. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +458. On or about November 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +459. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +460. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 111 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 2255 + +#### November 2004 - Incident 3 + +461. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and 'lieges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +462. On or about November 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +463. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature aigli he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +464. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorneys, , costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and pr nd ereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 112 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### November 2004 - Incident 4 + +465. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +466. On or about November 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +467. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +468. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 113 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2004 — Incident 1 + +469. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +470. On or about December 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +471. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +472. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 114 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2004 — Incident 2 + +473. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +474. On or about December 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +475. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +476. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 115 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2004 — Incident 3 + +477. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +478. On or about December 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +479. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M" w I continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +480. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demarAS94 dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 116 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### December 2004 - Incident 4 + +482 Pla tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about December 2004, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +483. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +484. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 117 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2005 — Incident 1 + +485. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +486. On or about January 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +487. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +488. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 118 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### January 2005 — Incident 2 + +489. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +490. On or about January 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +491. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, ,--s• United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury "3 nd ..suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliati , embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +492. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 119 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2005 — Incident 3 + +493. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +494. On or about January 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed afederal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +495. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +496. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all Ac• sci2 jury. triable as of right by a + +#### COUNT 12D , + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### January 2005 — Incident 4 + +497. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +498. On or about January 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +499. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +500. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 121 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### February 2005 - Incident 1 + +501. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +502. On or about February 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +503. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +504. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 122 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 + +#### February 2005 — Incident 2 + +505. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +506. On or about February 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +507. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These q‹ .. injuries are permanent in nature a eplaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +508. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 123 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +## February 2005 — Incident 3 + +509. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +510. On or about February 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +511. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +512. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 124 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### February 2005 — Incident 4 + +513. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +514. On or about February 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +515. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a toss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and aloss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +516. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 125 + +#### A\$ O Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### March 2005 - Incident 1 + +517. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +518. On or about March 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +519. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +520. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 126 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### March 2005 - Incident 2 + +521. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +522. On or about March 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +523. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L losses in the future. • I continue to suffer these + +524. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., derriarASkj dgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 127 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### March 2005 — Incident 3 + +525. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +526. On or about March 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +527. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological emices. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity Arsf t) ncome in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries ermanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +528. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 128 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### March 2005 — Incident 4 + +529. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +530. On or about March 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +531. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +532. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 129 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### April 2005 — Incident 1 + +533. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +534. On or about April 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation + +enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +535. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +536. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 130 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### Aprl 2005 — Incident 2 + +537. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +538. On or about April 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Govemment. + +539. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +540. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just ,ssp' o . and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all ' u triable as of right by a + +#### COUNT 16\ + +#### Cause of Action Pursueriet-tN8 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### April 2005 - Incident 3 + +541. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +542. On or about April 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed afederal sexual offense against her, including aviolation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is + +therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +543. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, LM., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +544. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 132 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### April 2005 — Incident 4 + +545. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +546. On or about April 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +547. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +548. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 133 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 5 2255 + +#### May 2005 - Incident 1 + +549. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +550. On or about May 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including aviolation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this + +Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +551. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature a eplaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +552. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 134 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### May 2005 — Incident 2 + +553. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +554. On or about May 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +555. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +556. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 135 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### May 2005 — Incident 3 + +557. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +558. On or about May 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +559. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +560. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 136 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### May 2005 — Incident 4 + +561. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +562. On or about May 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of + +numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement bgtweep the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +563. As a direct and proximate result Of, t enses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +564. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right 137 + +#### COUNT 137 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2005 — Incident 1 + +565. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +566. On or about June 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +567. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered aloss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., wi I continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +568. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., dema&I gments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 138 + +## Gaut) of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +( S" laifitiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +#### June 2005 — Incident 2 + +nor about June 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., + +Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed afederal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Govemment. + +571. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +572. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 139 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2005 — Incident 3 + +573. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +574. On or about June 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of e o more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +575. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of + +self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +576. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 140 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### June 2005 — Incident 4 + +577. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +578. On or about June 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +579. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +580. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 141 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2005 — Incident 1 + +581. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +582. On or about July 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +583. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse + +and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +584. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all i ble as of right by a jury. + +## COUNT 142 .)•• + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to\ f/8 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### July 2005 — Incident 2 + +585. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +586. On or about July 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is + +therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +587. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and aloss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +588. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 143 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### July 2005 - Incident 3 + +589. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +590. On or about July 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +591. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and + +psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +592. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 144 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### July 2005 — Incident 4 + +593. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and Illleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +594. On or about July 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this + +Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +595. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature a he ptaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +596. Wherefore, th laintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorneys fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, end reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 145 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### August 2005 — Incident 1 + +597. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +598. On or about August 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +599. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These + +injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +600. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 146 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### August 2005 — Incident 2 + +601. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +602. On or about August 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +603. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a foss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +604. Wherefore, the plainti ( S6\ mands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 147 + +# OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### Ar"•\- August 2005 - Incident 3 + +605. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +606. On or about August 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a + +violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +607. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +608. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 148 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### August 2005 — Incident 4 + +609. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +610. On or about August 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore, a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, as cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Se the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +611. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past + +suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M ' continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +612. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., de s a i against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages a east the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 149 + +#### CauT of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 + +#### (S , September 2005 — Incident 1 + +61 tiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +n or about September 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to + +engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +615. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +616. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 10 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2005 — Incident 2 + +617. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +618. On or about September 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +619. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, aloss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and aloss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +620. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 151 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### September 2005 - Incident 3 + +621. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +622. On or about September 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, + +child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +623. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +624. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 152 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### September 2005 — Incident 4 + +625. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 626. On or about September 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +627. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +628. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all unable as of right by a jury. + +#### NTN COU + +## Cause of Action Pursua4to 8 U.S.C. \$ 2255 + +## October 2005 - Incident 1 + +629. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +630. On or about October 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). + +L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +631. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +632. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 154 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 + +#### October 2005 — Incident 2 + +633. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +634. On or about October 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), §'2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +635. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, toss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +636. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 155 + +## Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2005 - Incident 3 + +637. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +638. On or about October 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to + +this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +639. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and conventional way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature he plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +ki 640. Wherefore, th laintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and prope , reby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +#### COUNT 156 + +#### Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 + +#### October 2005 - Incident 4 + +641. Plaintiff, L.M. adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 above. + +642. On or about October 2005, the exact date being unknown to L.M., Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed a federal sexual offense against her, including a violation of numerous federal criminal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), and § 2423(e). L.M. is therefore a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and, as such, asserts a cause of action against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government. + +643. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against her, L.M. has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss cignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with defendan Al.4 0bffre Epstein, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and cone nal way of life for a minor. The then-minor plaintiff L.M. incurred medical and psychological expenses and the plaintiff, L.M., will in the future suffer medical and psychological expenses. The plaintiff, L.M., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the plaintiff, L.M., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. + +644. Wherefore, the plaintiff, L.M., demands judgments against the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. + +#### DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL + +Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. + +DATED July 24, 2009 + +ctfully Submitted, + +adl y J. + +ROTHSTE NFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwards(c≥rra-law.com + +The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) **NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-filed Cases Below.** + +**I. (a) PLAINTIFFS** + +L.M. + +(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Palm Beach +(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) + +(c) Attorney's (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 - Phone 954-522-3456 + +**DEFENDANTS** + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Palm Beach +(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) + +NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT LAND INVOLVED. + +Attorneys (If Known) + +J. [REDACTED] + +(a) Check County Where Action Arose: MIAMI-DADE MONROE BROWARD PALM BEACH ST. LUCIE INDIAN RIVER OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS + +**II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION** (Place an "X" in One Box Only) + + 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) + 2 U.S. Government Defendant 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) + +*9:09 CV 81092-Cohn-Soltzer* + +**III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES** (Place an "X" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant) + +| (For Diversity Cases Only) | | PTF | DEF | PTF | DEF | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------| +| Citizen of This State | | 1 | 1 | Incorporated or Principal Place of Business In This State | 4 | 4 | +| Citizen of Another State | | 2 | 2 | Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State | 5 | 5 | +| Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country | | 3 | 3 | Foreign Nation | 6 | 6 | + +**IV. NATURE OF SUIT** (Place an "X" in One Box Only) + +| CONTRACT | TORTS | FORFEITURE/PENALTY | BANKRUPTCY | OTHER STATUTES | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 [REDACTED] Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits
160 Stockholders' Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise | PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product Liability
320 Assault, Libel & Slander
330 Federal Employers' Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability
360 Other Personal Injury | PERSONAL INJURY
362 Personal Injury - Med. Malpractice
365 Personal Injury - Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal Property Damage
385 Property Damage Product Liability | 610 Agriculture
620 Other Food & Drug
625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881
630 Liquor Laws
640 R.R. & Truck
650 Airline Regs.
660 Occupational Safety/Health
690 Other | 422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
840 Trademark
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
720 Labor/Mgmt. Relations
730 Labor/Mgmt. Reporting & Disclosure Act
740 Railway Labor Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
463 Habeas Corpus-Alien Detainee
465 Other Immigration Actions | 400 State Reapportionment
410 Antitrust
430 Banks and Banking
450 Commerce
460 Deportation
470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
810 Selective Service
850 Securities/Commodities/Exchange
875 Customer Challenge 12 USC 3410
890 Other Statutory Actions
891 Agricultural Acts
892 Economic Stabilization Act
893 Environmental Matters
894 Energy Allocation Act
895 Freedom of Information Act
900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice
950 Constitutionality of State Statutes | + +**V. ORIGIN** (Place an "X" in One Box Only) + 1 Original Proceeding 2 Removed from State Court 3 Re-filed-(see VI below) 4 Reinstated or Reopened 5 Transferred from another district (specify) 6 Multidistrict Litigation 7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment + +**VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).** (See instructions second page): JUDGE **a) Re-filed Case YES NO b) Related Cases YES NO** +DOCKET NUMBER 9:08-cv-80119 + +**VII. CAUSE OF ACTION** 18 USC Section 2255 +Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): +LENGTH OF TRIAL via 10-14 days estimated (for both sides to try entire case) + +**VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:** CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 **DEMAND \$ INEXCESS CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND:** Yes No + +ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD DATE **7-24-09** + +FOR OFFICE USE ONLY +AMOUNT **3500** RECEIPT # IFP **546977** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf4aec375d8d2b4462ebfc2df47887584131566b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/EFTA02761329.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,25196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 351, + "chars": 571640, + "elapsed_seconds": 69.37, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_82_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_89_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_93_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_114_Picture_3.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 393.6209411621094, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 393.6209411621094, + 231.66033935546875 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 231.66033935546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.7, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 290.7, + 132.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 189.54000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APP.2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 413.1, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 413.1, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 410.1414489746094, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 410.1414489746094, + 99.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 99.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE REFERENCES TO NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT OR, IN \nTHE ALTERNATIVE, TO LIFT PROTECTIVE ORDER ILIARRING JANE DOE'S \nATTORNEY'S FROM REVEALING PROVISIONS IN THE AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 540.764892578125, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 540.764892578125, + 320.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 320.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSIO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 362.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 362.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 387.3754577636719, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 387.3754577636719, + 320.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 320.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys for Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 183.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorney for United States", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 512.73 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys for Plaintiff", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.776, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 183.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 410.1414489746094, + 71.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 410.1414489746094, + 99.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 99.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.8210754394531, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.8210754394531, + 293.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 293.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Parties. Jurisdiction and Venue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 398.93011474609375, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 398.93011474609375, + 320.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 320.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Factual Alienations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 364.63031005859375, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 364.63031005859375, + 389.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 389.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUN14/ < <_ \\A) )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 395.5625, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 395.5625, + 361.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 361.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sexual Battery upon a Minor", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 408.87799072265625, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 408.87799072265625, + 389.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 389.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.624, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 336.6098327636719, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 336.6098327636719, + 527.4199829101562 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 527.4199829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC \u00a72255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 540.1874847412109 + ], + [ + 431.13043212890625, + 540.1874847412109 + ], + [ + 431.13043212890625, + 555.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 555.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT III", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 338.3856201171875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 338.3856201171875, + 86.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 86.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 98.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 429.8492736816406, + 98.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 429.8492736816406, + 113.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 113.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT IV\\ < < \\A) )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 395.5625, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 395.5625, + 362.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 362.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.348, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 411.0741271972656, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 411.0741271972656, + 389.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 201.348, + 389.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT V", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.624, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 336.46954345703125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 336.46954345703125, + 86.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 86.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to Florida Statute 796.09 \nAgainst Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 453.6729431152344, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 453.6729431152344, + 127.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 127.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 319.6875 + ], + [ + 387.3754577636719, + 319.6875 + ], + [ + 387.3754577636719, + 334.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 334.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys for Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 169.29 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lead Counsel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Co-Counsel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 497.34000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys for Plaintiff", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.776, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 421.66799999999995, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 168.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lead Counsel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.776, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 319.14000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pro Hac Vice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.776, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 379.44, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 379.44, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 443.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL RICO CASE STATEMENT \nPURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 12.1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 407.01300048828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 407.01300048828125, + 99.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 99.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH 2 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 3 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.124, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 408.2660827636719, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 408.2660827636719, + 96.92999267578125 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 96.92999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING \nFRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO \nTAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN, AND TO POST A $15 MILLION BOND.\nTO SECURE POTENTIAL JUDGMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.95500000000001, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 543.66, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 543.66, + 495.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 71.95500000000001, + 495.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.968, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 539.9075317382812, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 539.9075317382812, + 82.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 82.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.736, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 407.9190979003906, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 407.9190979003906, + 481.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 200.736, + 481.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 342.3171691894531, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 342.3171691894531, + 206.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 206.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. EPSTEIN IS FRAUDULENTLY TRANSFERRING HIS ASSETS.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.42800000000001, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 470.70513916015625, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 470.70513916015625, + 233.42999267578125 + ], + [ + 103.42800000000001, + 233.42999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.192, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.3843994140625, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.3843994140625, + 83.42999267578125 + ], + [ + 285.192, + 83.42999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. UNDER THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFER ACT, JANE DOE IS \nENTITLED TO THE REMEDIES OF APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER \nTO TAKE CHARGE OF EPSTEIN'S ASSETS, FILE AN ACCOUNTING \nOF THOSE ASSETS WITJI tHE COURT, AND TO POST A $15 \nMILLION BOND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.42800000000001, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 541.10693359375, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 541.10693359375, + 399.92999267578125 + ], + [ + 103.42800000000001, + 399.92999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.968, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.19599999999997, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.19599999999997, + 83.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 83.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa \nCONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 541.0932006835938, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 541.0932006835938, + 96.1700439453125 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 96.1700439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.45220947265625, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.45220947265625, + 109.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 109.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF PAUL G. CASSELL, ESOUIRE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.196, + 97.80889892578125 + ], + [ + 435.34112548828125, + 97.80889892578125 + ], + [ + 435.34112548828125, + 111.81353759765625 + ], + [ + 173.196, + 111.81353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 401.4002685546875, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 401.4002685546875, + 70.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 70.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 489.85113525390625, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 489.85113525390625, + 288.7330627441406 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 288.7330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 331.09200000000004, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 331.09200000000004, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 465.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.024, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 331.096923828125, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 331.096923828125, + 550.113037109375 + ], + [ + 246.024, + 550.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 375.11419677734375, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 375.11419677734375, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 426.0485534667969, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 426.0485534667969, + 131.156494140625 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 131.156494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 1CC)\nDEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S \nFIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS (dated 03/23/091", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 356.31610107421875 + ], + [ + 496.82916259765625, + 356.31610107421875 + ], + [ + 496.82916259765625, + 400.7419738769531 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 400.7419738769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 660.15 + ], + [ + 386.0820007324219, + 660.15 + ], + [ + 386.0820007324219, + 678.7729644775391 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 678.7729644775391 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.95999999999998, + 68.4375 + ], + [ + 410.8999938964844, + 68.4375 + ], + [ + 410.8999938964844, + 96.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 201.95999999999998, + 96.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND DIRECTING RECEIVER TO SECURE \nASSETS FOR POSTING OF A BOND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 519.7422485351562, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 519.7422485351562, + 440.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 440.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 72.64501953125 + ], + [ + 402.69390869140625, + 72.64501953125 + ], + [ + 402.69390869140625, + 100.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 100.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.908, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 329.868, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 329.868, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 280.908, + 396.90000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORD D ADJUDGED that", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 290.359375, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 290.359375, + 554.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 554.7324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APP.7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.33500000000004, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 412.85589599609375, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 412.85589599609375, + 106.8096923828125 + ], + [ + 202.33500000000004, + 106.8096923828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 439.3511047363281, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 439.3511047363281, + 286.3526306152344 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 286.3526306152344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF FASTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.39, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 379.8420104980469, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 379.8420104980469, + 339.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 237.39, + 339.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.75, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 338.20281982421875, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 338.20281982421875, + 311.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 276.75, + 311.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 437.7438049316406, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 437.7438049316406, + 339.8035583496094 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 339.8035583496094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2002 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 378.5213317871094, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 378.5213317871094, + 367.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 367.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.98, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 337.44091796875, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 337.44091796875, + 585.8035125732422 + ], + [ + 277.98, + 585.8035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 439.6238098144531, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 439.6238098144531, + 613.9235076904297 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 613.9235076904297 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2002 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.315, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 381.107421875, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 381.107421875, + 641.6835174560547 + ], + [ + 234.315, + 641.6835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 332.1, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 332.1, + 255.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 255.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6.2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 434.47216796875, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 434.47216796875, + 283.9335632324219 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 283.9335632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2002 - incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 376.995, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 376.995, + 312.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 312.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 4 < \\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 514.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 334.8155212402344, + 514.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 334.8155212402344, + 534.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 534.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 541.8900000000001 + ], + [ + 437.1261901855469, + 541.8900000000001 + ], + [ + 437.1261901855469, + 557.4199981689453 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 557.4199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"at\"\"' August 2002 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.760009765625, + 569.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 379.3114318847656, + 569.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 379.3114318847656, + 585.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 104.760009765625, + 585.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 333.60772705078125, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 333.60772705078125, + 203.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 203.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 435.9969787597656, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 435.9969787597656, + 230.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 230.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2002 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.785, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 391.0714416503906, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 391.0714416503906, + 258.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 220.785, + 258.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 334.47601318359375, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 334.47601318359375, + 474.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 474.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.3669738769531, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.3669738769531, + 503.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 503.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2002 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.785, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 388.7509460449219, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 388.7509460449219, + 530.7999877929688 + ], + [ + 220.785, + 530.7999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 332.4026184082031, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 332.4026184082031, + 146.800048828125 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 146.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 435.2469787597656, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 435.2469787597656, + 175.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 175.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2002 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.785, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.7763671875, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.7763671875, + 203.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 220.785, + 203.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 8", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 334.3548278808594, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 334.3548278808594, + 420.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 420.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 448.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 448.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2002 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.39999999999998, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 389.1955261230469, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 389.1955261230469, + 476.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 221.39999999999998, + 476.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 78.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 333.39410400390625, + 78.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 333.39410400390625, + 93.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 93.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 435.6261901855469, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 435.6261901855469, + 121.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 121.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2002 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 382.4514465332031, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 382.4514465332031, + 149.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 149.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT.\\14/ c)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 375.91900634765625, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 375.91900634765625, + 368.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 368.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursue N8 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 438.9314270019531, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 438.9314270019531, + 396.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 396.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2002 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9974365234375, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9974365234375, + 424.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 424.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 11", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 338.8609619140625, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 338.8609619140625, + 638.4199981689453 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 638.4199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 436.3669738769531, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 436.3669738769531, + 666.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 666.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2002 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.0, + 78.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 377.61, + 78.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 377.61, + 92.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 229.0, + 92.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 338.5327453613281, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 338.5327453613281, + 310.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 310.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4969787597656, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4969787597656, + 339.1800231933594 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 339.1800231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2002 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 382.6814270019531, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 382.6814270019531, + 366.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 366.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 333.967529296875, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 333.967529296875, + 583.6226806640625 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 583.6226806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.74, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 432.50653076171875, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 432.50653076171875, + 613.1805114746094 + ], + [ + 169.74, + 613.1805114746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2002 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.325, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 385.5067138671875, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 385.5067138671875, + 639.9000000000001 + ], + [ + 218.325, + 639.9000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 14", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 338.48992919921875, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 338.48992919921875, + 255.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 255.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 437.4961853027344, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 437.4961853027344, + 284.0500183105469 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 284.0500183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2002 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.86, + 297.1875 + ], + [ + 388.0596618652344, + 297.1875 + ], + [ + 388.0596618652344, + 312.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 223.86, + 312.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "< \\\\., COUNT 15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 336.35791015625, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 336.35791015625, + 534.0635375976562 + ], + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 534.0635375976562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.44000244140625, + 539.1354675292969 + ], + [ + 435.1714172363281, + 539.1354675292969 + ], + [ + 435.1714172363281, + 559.2305755615234 + ], + [ + 135.44000244140625, + 559.2305755615234 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2002 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.015, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 385.52685546875, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 385.52685546875, + 586.5635223388672 + ], + [ + 222.015, + 586.5635223388672 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 16", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 336.98004150390625, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 336.98004150390625, + 201.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 201.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 4 \" Alt -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 496.1684265136719, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 496.1684265136719, + 229.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 229.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2002 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.63, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 386.5666198730469, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 386.5666198730469, + 257.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 222.63, + 257.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 17", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 474.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 474.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 434.7438049316406, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 434.7438049316406, + 502.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 502.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2002 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 384.5213317871094, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 384.5213317871094, + 530.6835327148438 + ], + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 530.6835327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 339.24005126953125, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 339.24005126953125, + 148.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 148.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 437.7538146972656, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 437.7538146972656, + 176.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 176.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2002 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.63, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 387.867431640625, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 387.867431640625, + 204.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 222.63, + 204.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.0528259277344, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.0528259277344, + 420.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 420.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 437.3738098144531, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 437.3738098144531, + 448.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 448.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2002 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.86, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 387.5487060546875, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 387.5487060546875, + 476.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 223.86, + 476.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.44000244140625, + 77.91888427734375 + ], + [ + 336.40500000000003, + 77.91888427734375 + ], + [ + 336.40500000000003, + 92.29351806640625 + ], + [ + 272.44000244140625, + 92.29351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2266", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.77999877929688, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 434.805, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 434.805, + 120.42352294921875 + ], + [ + 173.77999877929688, + 120.42352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2002 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.74998474121094, + 134.15887451171875 + ], + [ + 384.99, + 134.15887451171875 + ], + [ + 384.99, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 222.74998474121094, + 148.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT t\\\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 347.9534912109375, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 347.9534912109375, + 363.9859619140625 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 363.9859619140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action PursuS to 8 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.0652160644531, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.0652160644531, + 392.54241943359375 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 392.54241943359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 383.247802734375, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 383.247802734375, + 421.67626953125 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 421.67626953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 340.36676025390625, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 340.36676025390625, + 639.0635223388672 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 639.0635223388672 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 666.8035278320312 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 666.8035278320312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 76.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 381.29999999999995, + 76.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 381.29999999999995, + 91.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 91.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 23", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 336.3465881347656, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 336.3465881347656, + 311.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 311.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 435.2461853027344, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 435.2461853027344, + 339.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 339.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.0726318359375, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.0726318359375, + 367.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 367.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 24", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 335.9448547363281, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 335.9448547363281, + 583.8484039306641 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 583.8484039306641 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 433.9489440917969, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 433.9489440917969, + 613.1283111572266 + ], + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 613.1283111572266 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.54999999999998, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 378.3642578125, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 378.3642578125, + 641.6669616699219 + ], + [ + 227.54999999999998, + 641.6669616699219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 25", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.5834655761719, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.5834655761719, + 256.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 256.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 435.1714172363281, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 435.1714172363281, + 284.6835632324219 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 284.6835632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 385.07281494140625, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 385.07281494140625, + 312.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 312.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "< COUNT 26", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 338.1103515625, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 338.1103515625, + 534.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 534.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A$ C) Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.05999755859375, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 436.7461853027344, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 436.7461853027344, + 559.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 105.05999755859375, + 559.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.54999999999998, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 383.9396667480469, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 383.9396667480469, + 587.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 227.54999999999998, + 587.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 27", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 337.50762939453125, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 337.50762939453125, + 202.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 202.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 451.8299865722656, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 451.8299865722656, + 231.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 231.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2003 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 384.02685546875, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 384.02685546875, + 258.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 258.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 28", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 333.701904296875, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 333.701904296875, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 473.84999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Gaut of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 432.4477233886719, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 432.4477233886719, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 503.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2003 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.86, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 379.4892578125, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 379.4892578125, + 530.6494445800781 + ], + [ + 223.86, + 530.6494445800781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 338.1763000488281, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 338.1763000488281, + 147.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 147.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 175.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 175.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2003 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.54500000000002, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 378.7014465332031, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 378.7014465332031, + 203.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 235.54500000000002, + 203.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 30", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 338.9200744628906, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 338.9200744628906, + 421.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 421.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 434.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 437.3738098144531, + 434.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 437.3738098144531, + 449.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 449.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.16, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 376.2374267578125, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 376.2374267578125, + 477.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 236.16, + 477.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 31", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.6700439453125, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 335.9143981933594, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 335.9143981933594, + 91.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 271.6700439453125, + 91.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.77000427246094, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 433.6238098144531, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 433.6238098144531, + 119.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 173.77000427246094, + 119.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2003 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.14999389648438, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 372.68999999999994, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 372.68999999999994, + 147.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 234.14999389648438, + 147.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT \nCr ilJNTA,.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.4300537109375, + 350.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 355.0906677246094, + 350.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 355.0906677246094, + 364.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 272.4300537109375, + 364.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action PursuStr)r 4 8 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.7699737548828, + 375.0982360839844 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 375.0982360839844 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 393.97760009765625 + ], + [ + 173.7699737548828, + 393.97760009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.54998779296875, + 406.41888427734375 + ], + [ + 373.0766296386719, + 406.41888427734375 + ], + [ + 373.0766296386719, + 420.79351806640625 + ], + [ + 234.54998779296875, + 420.79351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 33", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 623.5388946533203 + ], + [ + 334.33050537109375, + 623.5388946533203 + ], + [ + 334.33050537109375, + 637.5435180664062 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 637.5435180664062 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 433.2538146972656, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 433.2538146972656, + 665.6635131835938 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 665.6635131835938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 373.4528503417969, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 373.4528503417969, + 93.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 93.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 34", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.0528869628906, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.0528869628906, + 309.9344482421875 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 309.9344482421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4401550292969, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4401550292969, + 339.01580810546875 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 339.01580810546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 372.3514404296875, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 372.3514404296875, + 367.25775146484375 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 367.25775146484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 582.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 610.74 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 610.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 369.0, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 369.0, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 638.2800000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 36", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 338.86773681640625, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 338.86773681640625, + 255.1400146484375 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 255.1400146484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 437.6640319824219, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 437.6640319824219, + 284.6295166015625 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 284.6295166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 372.655517578125, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 372.655517578125, + 312.5052490234375 + ], + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 312.5052490234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 37", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 337.5323486328125, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 337.5323486328125, + 529.5912475585938 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 529.5912475585938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.1533966064453, + 534.9589538574219 + ], + [ + 435.99273681640625, + 534.9589538574219 + ], + [ + 435.99273681640625, + 569.0960388183594 + ], + [ + 136.1533966064453, + 569.0960388183594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2003 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 367.8626708984375, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 367.8626708984375, + 587.1993255615234 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 587.1993255615234 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 38", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.95416259765625, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 332.71500000000003, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 332.71500000000003, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 269.95416259765625, + 199.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 448.4487609863281, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 448.4487609863281, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 228.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2003 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.235, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 365.31, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 365.31, + 257.19189453125 + ], + [ + 239.235, + 257.19189453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 39", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.0221862792969, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.0221862792969, + 475.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 475.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.2438049316406, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.2438049316406, + 503.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 503.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2003 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 369.7768249511719, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 369.7768249511719, + 531.8035278320312 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 531.8035278320312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 40", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 338.65478515625, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 338.65478515625, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 437.2753601074219, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 437.2753601074219, + 176.48077392578125 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 176.48077392578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2003 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 370.2546691894531, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 370.2546691894531, + 203.525634765625 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 203.525634765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 41", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.106201171875, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.106201171875, + 422.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 422.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.3769836425781, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.3769836425781, + 450.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 450.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 374.5814514160156, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 374.5814514160156, + 478.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 478.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 42", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 77.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 339.48, + 77.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 339.48, + 91.54351806640625 + ], + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 91.54351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.4099884033203, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.87999999999994, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.87999999999994, + 119.66351318359375 + ], + [ + 176.4099884033203, + 119.66351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.29000854492188, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 373.305, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 373.305, + 148.16351318359375 + ], + [ + 241.29000854492188, + 148.16351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 43", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 337.4864807128906, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 337.4864807128906, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 435.0377197265625, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 435.0377197265625, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 572.67 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 370.31488037109375, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 370.31488037109375, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 421.20000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 44", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.1506042480469, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.1506042480469, + 637.47 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 637.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 438.27880859375, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 438.27880859375, + 666.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 666.6299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 186, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.1259765625, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.1259765625, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 90.72 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 45", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.55999755859375, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 337.02, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 337.02, + 309.79351806640625 + ], + [ + 273.55999755859375, + 309.79351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.89999389648438, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 435.1814270019531, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 435.1814270019531, + 337.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 174.89999389648438, + 337.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2003 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.66000366210938, + 351.28887939453125 + ], + [ + 370.83282470703125, + 351.28887939453125 + ], + [ + 370.83282470703125, + 365.66351318359375 + ], + [ + 241.66000366210938, + 365.66351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 46", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 337.5415344238281, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 337.5415344238281, + 584.0412902832031 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 584.0412902832031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 596.16 + ], + [ + 436.1989440917969, + 596.16 + ], + [ + 436.1989440917969, + 613.1508178710938 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 613.1508178710938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2003 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.465, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 368.9922180175781, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 368.9922180175781, + 641.5769805908203 + ], + [ + 240.465, + 641.5769805908203 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 47", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.1624755859375, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.1624755859375, + 256.300048828125 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 256.300048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 284.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 284.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 371.192626953125, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 371.192626953125, + 312.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 312.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 48", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 336.21533203125, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 336.21533203125, + 528.8898620605469 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 528.8898620605469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.1551055908203, + 534.9564208984375 + ], + [ + 435.30401611328125, + 534.9564208984375 + ], + [ + 435.30401611328125, + 569.0897827148438 + ], + [ + 136.1551055908203, + 569.0897827148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.235, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 368.0479431152344, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 368.0479431152344, + 586.4356842041016 + ], + [ + 239.235, + 586.4356842041016 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 49", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 337.0001525878906, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 337.0001525878906, + 201.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 201.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 435.8738098144531, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 435.8738098144531, + 229.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 229.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.855, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 380.20281982421875, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 380.20281982421875, + 258.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 231.855, + 258.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 50", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.2065734863281, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.2065734863281, + 474.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 474.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 503.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 503.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2003 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 378.6896667480469, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 378.6896667480469, + 531.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 232.46999999999997, + 531.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 51", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 341.6749572753906, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 341.6749572753906, + 145.9515380859375 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 145.9515380859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 439.0814208984375, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 439.0814208984375, + 175.13336181640625 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 175.13336181640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.70000000000002, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 380.35870361328125, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 380.35870361328125, + 203.54010009765625 + ], + [ + 233.70000000000002, + 203.54010009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 52", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.80999755859375, + 404.427490234375 + ], + [ + 335.9123840332031, + 404.427490234375 + ], + [ + 335.9123840332031, + 419.03997802734375 + ], + [ + 272.80999755859375, + 419.03997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 434.8769836425781, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 434.8769836425781, + 447.53997802734375 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 447.53997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2003 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.855, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 377.0714416503906, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 377.0714416503906, + 475.65997314453125 + ], + [ + 231.855, + 475.65997314453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 53", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.365, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.8650817871094, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.8650817871094, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 277.365, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.35, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 441.4989013671875, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 441.4989013671875, + 122.1671142578125 + ], + [ + 178.35, + 122.1671142578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 396.42669677734375, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 396.42669677734375, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 149.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NT\\ COU", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 333.33000000000004, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 333.33000000000004, + 366.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 366.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuait-to 8 U.S.C. 8 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.1238098144531, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.1238098144531, + 394.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 394.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.93999999999997, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 387.4874267578125, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 387.4874267578125, + 422.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 218.93999999999997, + 422.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 55", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 338.8759765625, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 338.8759765625, + 639.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 639.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. fi 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 437.4969787597656, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 437.4969787597656, + 667.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 667.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 202, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 383.145, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 383.145, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 56", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 296.0574951171875 + ], + [ + 337.3759765625, + 296.0574951171875 + ], + [ + 337.3759765625, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 311.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 338.78997802734375 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 338.78997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.015, + 352.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 389.4314270019531, + 352.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 389.4314270019531, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 222.015, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 57", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 335.4039001464844, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 335.4039001464844, + 584.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 584.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 596.16 + ], + [ + 434.4969787597656, + 596.16 + ], + [ + 434.4969787597656, + 612.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 612.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 380.5743713378906, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 380.5743713378906, + 639.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 639.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 58", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 339.97015380859375, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 339.97015380859375, + 258.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 258.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 438.9314270019531, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 438.9314270019531, + 286.1735534667969 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 286.1735534667969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.395, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 383.200927734375, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 383.200927734375, + 313.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 229.395, + 313.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.39999389648438, + 525.053466796875 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 525.053466796875 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 577.4129638671875 + ], + [ + 134.39999389648438, + 577.4129638671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 59", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 338.1642761230469, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 338.1642761230469, + 529.6799926757812 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 529.6799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2003 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.395, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 380.942626953125, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 380.942626953125, + 586.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 229.395, + 586.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 60", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 201.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 201.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 436.03499999999997, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 436.03499999999997, + 230.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 230.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 380.5666198730469, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 380.5666198730469, + 258.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 258.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 61", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 340.8742370605469, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 340.8742370605469, + 474.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 474.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 438.4938049316406, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 438.4938049316406, + 502.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 502.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.09, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 391.82281494140625, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 391.82281494140625, + 530.6835327148438 + ], + [ + 225.09, + 530.6835327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 62", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 339.52874755859375, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 339.52874755859375, + 146.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 146.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 438.55145263671875, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 438.55145263671875, + 174.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 174.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2003 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.09, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 388.607421875, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 388.607421875, + 202.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 225.09, + 202.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 63", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.7332458496094, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 339.7332458496094, + 420.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 420.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.4938049316406, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.4938049316406, + 448.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 448.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 388.6787109375, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 388.6787109375, + 477.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 477.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 64", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 215, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 339.49676513671875, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 339.49676513671875, + 92.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 92.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 215, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.1238098144531, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.1238098144531, + 120.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 120.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 215, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.09, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 389.1966247558594, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 389.1966247558594, + 148.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 225.09, + 148.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT \\ v", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 352.07232666015625, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 352.07232666015625, + 365.07318115234375 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 365.07318115234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuaf*atto '13 U.S.C. $ 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.5127258300781, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.5127258300781, + 394.2322692871094 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 394.2322692871094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2003 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.63, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 389.5641174316406, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 389.5641174316406, + 420.8682556152344 + ], + [ + 222.63, + 420.8682556152344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 66", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 340.36712646484375, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 340.36712646484375, + 639.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 639.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 439.7461853027344, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 439.7461853027344, + 667.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 667.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2003 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.63, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 388.8209228515625, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 388.8209228515625, + 93.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 222.63, + 93.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 67", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 219, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.9053649902344, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.9053649902344, + 310.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 310.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 219, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 438.9969787597656, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 438.9969787597656, + 339.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 339.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2003 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 219, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 389.192626953125, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 389.192626953125, + 366.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 366.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 582.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 439.3769836425781, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 439.3769836425781, + 614.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 614.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2003 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 389.9555358886719, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 389.9555358886719, + 642.1699981689453 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 642.1699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 69", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.1820373535156, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 339.1820373535156, + 256.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 256.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 438.1714172363281, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 438.1714172363281, + 284.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 284.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.855, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 385.45281982421875, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 385.45281982421875, + 312.4335632324219 + ], + [ + 231.855, + 312.4335632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 70", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 223, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 340.84539794921875, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 340.84539794921875, + 529.2999877929688 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 529.2999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 223, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 439.7469787597656, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 439.7469787597656, + 557.8000183105469 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 557.8000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 223, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.08500000000004, + 570.9375 + ], + [ + 383.9396667480469, + 570.9375 + ], + [ + 383.9396667480469, + 585.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 233.08500000000004, + 585.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 71", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29998779296875, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 338.2674560546875, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 338.2674560546875, + 201.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 274.29998779296875, + 201.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.2438049316406, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 436.2438049316406, + 229.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 229.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.855, + 243.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 380.0487060546875, + 243.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 380.0487060546875, + 257.67352294921875 + ], + [ + 231.855, + 257.67352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 72", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 226, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 339.2724609375, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 339.2724609375, + 474.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 474.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 226, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 503.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 503.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2004 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 226, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 383.0614318847656, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 383.0614318847656, + 531.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 531.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 73", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 228, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 341.22662353515625, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 341.22662353515625, + 146.0350341796875 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 146.0350341796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 228, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 439.8327331542969, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 439.8327331542969, + 174.7633056640625 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 174.7633056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2004 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 228, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.395, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 385.5689697265625, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 385.5689697265625, + 204.45806884765625 + ], + [ + 229.395, + 204.45806884765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 74", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 341.5120849609375, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 341.5120849609375, + 421.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 421.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 439.7569885253906, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 439.7569885253906, + 449.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 449.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2004 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.395, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 386.5109558105469, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 386.5109558105469, + 477.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 229.395, + 477.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 75", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 231, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 334.1394958496094, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 334.1394958496094, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 91.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 231, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 433.0307922363281, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 433.0307922363281, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 119.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2004\u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 231, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 380.59136962890625, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 380.59136962890625, + 148.77069091796875 + ], + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 148.77069091796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT% \\\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 348.9753112792969, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 348.9753112792969, + 363.97821044921875 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 363.97821044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuadt t 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.6752014160156, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.6752014160156, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 392.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 383.8470458984375, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 383.8470458984375, + 420.90582275390625 + ], + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 420.90582275390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 77", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 233, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.1687927246094, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.1687927246094, + 640.6699981689453 + ], + [ + 273.67499999999995, + 640.6699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 233, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 668.4200134277344 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 668.4200134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 234, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.93, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 379.44744873046875, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 379.44744873046875, + 92.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 234.93, + 92.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 78", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 235, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.0154113769531, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.0154113769531, + 313.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 313.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 235, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 440.3838195800781, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 440.3838195800781, + 341.67352294921875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 341.67352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 235, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.39, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.450927734375, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.450927734375, + 369.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 237.39, + 369.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 79", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.95062255859375, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.95062255859375, + 587.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 587.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 440.5069885253906, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 440.5069885253906, + 614.7899932861328 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 614.7899932861328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 379.45263671875, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 379.45263671875, + 642.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 642.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 80", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 238, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 339.3171081542969, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 339.3171081542969, + 257.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 257.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 238, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 285.5500183105469 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 285.5500183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 238, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.77499999999998, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 378.4173583984375, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 378.4173583984375, + 313.3000183105469 + ], + [ + 236.77499999999998, + 313.3000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 81", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 341.9461364746094, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 341.9461364746094, + 531.9199829101562 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 531.9199829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 440.1261901855469, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 440.1261901855469, + 560.0399932861328 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 560.0399932861328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 377.5714416503906, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 377.5714416503906, + 588.1699981689453 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 588.1699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 82", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 241, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 340.02880859375, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 340.02880859375, + 201.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 201.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 241, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 438.9961853027344, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 438.9961853027344, + 230.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 230.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 241, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.695, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 373.3809509277344, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 373.3809509277344, + 258.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 241.695, + 258.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 83", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 242, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 340.8468933105469, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 340.8468933105469, + 476.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 476.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 242, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 439.3669738769531, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 439.3669738769531, + 504.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 504.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2004 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 242, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 374.2763671875, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 374.2763671875, + 532.6699829101562 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 532.6699829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 84", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.29, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.5406494140625, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.5406494140625, + 147.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 274.29, + 147.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 175.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 175.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 373.6814270019531, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 373.6814270019531, + 203.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 203.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 85", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 337.3772277832031, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 337.3772277832031, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 418.77 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.61260986328125, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 436.61260986328125, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 447.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2004\u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 369.0, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 369.0, + 476.9122314453125 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 476.9122314453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 86", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.848876953125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.848876953125, + 93.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 274.90500000000003, + 93.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 121.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 121.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 371.357421875, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 371.357421875, + 149.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 149.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 8/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 248, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 341.44580078125, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 341.44580078125, + 368.03997802734375 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 368.03997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 248, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 440.4961853027344, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 440.4961853027344, + 396.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 396.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2004 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 248, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 372.692626953125, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 372.692626953125, + 423.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 423.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 88", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 249, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.52, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.9892578125, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 339.9892578125, + 639.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 275.52, + 639.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 249, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.9969787597656, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.9969787597656, + 667.3000106811523 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 667.3000106811523 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 250, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 370.0666198730469, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 370.0666198730469, + 93.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 93.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 89", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 251, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.79071044921875, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.79071044921875, + 311.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 311.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 251, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 439.7469787597656, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 439.7469787597656, + 339.1800231933594 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 339.1800231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 251, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 377.9514465332031, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 377.9514465332031, + 366.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 366.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 90", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 252, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.5868835449219, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.5868835449219, + 585.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 585.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 252, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 440.4961853027344, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 440.4961853027344, + 613.6800079345703 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 613.6800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2004 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 252, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 375.6309509277344, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 375.6309509277344, + 641.4199981689453 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 641.4199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 91", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 254, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.9300231933594, + 240.5474853515625 + ], + [ + 337.84698486328125, + 240.5474853515625 + ], + [ + 337.84698486328125, + 255.15997314453125 + ], + [ + 273.9300231933594, + 255.15997314453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 254, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.6599884033203, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 435.6361999511719, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 435.6361999511719, + 283.6600036621094 + ], + [ + 175.6599884033203, + 283.6600036621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 254, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.7899932861328, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 371.46, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 371.46, + 311.7799987792969 + ], + [ + 239.7899932861328, + 311.7799987792969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "< COUNT 92", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 340.3868103027344, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 340.3868103027344, + 534.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 154.77000427246094, + 534.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A\\S Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.1100082397461, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 439.7461853027344, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 439.7461853027344, + 558.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 105.1100082397461, + 558.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 571.6875 + ], + [ + 375.5614318847656, + 571.6875 + ], + [ + 375.5614318847656, + 586.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 586.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 93", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 334.0775451660156, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 334.0775451660156, + 200.88 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 200.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 2255 s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 449.2124938964844, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 449.2124938964844, + 229.419921875 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 229.419921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2004 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 369.986572265625, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 369.986572265625, + 259.05169677734375 + ], + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 259.05169677734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 94", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 258, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 474.79351806640625 + ], + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 474.79351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 258, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 436.3114318847656, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 436.3114318847656, + 502.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 502.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 258, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 369.700927734375, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 369.700927734375, + 531.0435180664062 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 531.0435180664062 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 95", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 260, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 341.13629150390625, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 341.13629150390625, + 147.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 147.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 nss", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 260, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 157.00543212890625 + ], + [ + 441.55035400390625, + 157.00543212890625 + ], + [ + 441.55035400390625, + 177.1005859375 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 177.1005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 260, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 373.0726318359375, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 373.0726318359375, + 204.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 204.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 96", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 337.63500000000005, + 420.04351806640625 + ], + [ + 274.6800231933594, + 420.04351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.0199737548828, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 436.2538146972656, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 436.2538146972656, + 448.16351318359375 + ], + [ + 176.0199737548828, + 448.16351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 370.0766296386719, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 370.0766296386719, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 476.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 97", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 263, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 78.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 337.6514587402344, + 78.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 337.6514587402344, + 93.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 93.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 263, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 121.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 121.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 263, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.08500000000004, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 381.3214416503906, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 381.3214416503906, + 149.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 233.08500000000004, + 149.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 9i\\\" -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 264, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.135, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 350.274658203125, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 350.274658203125, + 366.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 276.135, + 366.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. fi 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 264, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 439.9938049316406, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 439.9938049316406, + 393.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 393.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 264, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.16, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.0609130859375, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.0609130859375, + 421.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 236.16, + 421.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 99", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 265, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 337.05908203125, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 337.05908203125, + 639.1699981689453 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 639.1699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 265, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 667.6700057983398 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 667.6700057983398 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2004 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 266, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.16, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 382.0726318359375, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 382.0726318359375, + 92.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 236.16, + 92.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 100", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 267, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.5420837402344, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.5420837402344, + 310.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 310.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 267, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 437.05145263671875, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 437.05145263671875, + 338.67352294921875 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 338.67352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2004 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 267, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.315, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.0666198730469, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 379.0666198730469, + 367.17352294921875 + ], + [ + 234.315, + 367.17352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 101", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 268, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 339.9475402832031, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 339.9475402832031, + 584.01 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 584.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 268, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 435.1814270019531, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 435.1814270019531, + 612.4235229492188 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 612.4235229492188 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 268, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 389.96282958984375, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 389.96282958984375, + 640.1635131835938 + ], + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 640.1635131835938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 103", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 270, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.3100280761719, + 515.1588745117188 + ], + [ + 338.2710266113281, + 515.1588745117188 + ], + [ + 338.2710266113281, + 529.1635131835938 + ], + [ + 268.3100280761719, + 529.1635131835938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 270, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.9099884033203, + 525.033447265625 + ], + [ + 433.6338195800781, + 525.033447265625 + ], + [ + 433.6338195800781, + 577.3929595947266 + ], + [ + 132.9099884033203, + 577.3929595947266 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 270, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 571.0388946533203 + ], + [ + 385.688720703125, + 571.0388946533203 + ], + [ + 385.688720703125, + 585.4235229492188 + ], + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 585.4235229492188 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 104", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 272, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.835, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 334.70806884765625, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 334.70806884765625, + 201.69 + ], + [ + 263.835, + 201.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 272, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.74, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 430.3076171875, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 430.3076171875, + 230.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 169.74, + 230.84999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 272, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 383.8678283691406, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 383.8678283691406, + 259.5655517578125 + ], + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 259.5655517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 105", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 273, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 341.4980773925781, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 341.4980773925781, + 476.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 476.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 273, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 437.1169738769531, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 437.1169738769531, + 504.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 174.65999999999997, + 504.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 273, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 517.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 383.9514465332031, + 517.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 383.9514465332031, + 532.2999877929688 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 532.2999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 106", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 342.3451843261719, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 342.3451843261719, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 437.60894775390625, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 437.60894775390625, + 174.987060546875 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 174.987060546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 381.4449462890625, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 381.4449462890625, + 201.69 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 201.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 107", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 276, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 342.9250183105469, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 342.9250183105469, + 420.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 420.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 276, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 449.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 449.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2004 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 276, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 382.8226318359375, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 382.8226318359375, + 477.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 477.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 108", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 278, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 341.94, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 341.94, + 93.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 93.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 278, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.4214172363281, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.4214172363281, + 121.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 121.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2004 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 278, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.855, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 382.0666198730469, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 382.0666198730469, + 149.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 231.855, + 149.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 109", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.68, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 341.2096252441406, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 341.2096252441406, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 265.68, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant toS U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 432.64501953125, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 432.64501953125, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 393.65999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2004 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.555, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 386.6252746582031, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 386.6252746582031, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 219.555, + 421.20000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 110", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.295, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 337.50469970703125, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 337.50469970703125, + 637.47 + ], + [ + 266.295, + 637.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 433.1127624511719, + 650.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 433.1127624511719, + 666.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 666.6299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.9099884033203, + 77.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 388.68, + 77.53887939453125 + ], + [ + 388.68, + 91.54351806640625 + ], + [ + 225.9099884033203, + 91.54351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 111", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 343.0599365234375, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 343.0599365234375, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 310.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4940185546875, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 437.4940185546875, + 339.4630126953125 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 339.4630126953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2004 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.63, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 387.5681457519531, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 387.5681457519531, + 366.26641845703125 + ], + [ + 222.63, + 366.26641845703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 112", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 283, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 344.94854736328125, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 344.94854736328125, + 586.6699981689453 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 586.6699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 283, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 440.5069885253906, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 440.5069885253906, + 614.4199981689453 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 614.4199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2004 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 283, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 391.6914367675781, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 391.6914367675781, + 642.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 642.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 113", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 342.11517333984375, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 342.11517333984375, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 255.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 437.37261962890625, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 437.37261962890625, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 284.31 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2004 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 386.743896484375, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 386.743896484375, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 311.85 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 114", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 286, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.90999999999997, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 339.211181640625, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 339.211181640625, + 529.123046875 + ], + [ + 266.90999999999997, + 529.123046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 286, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.788818359375, + 534.5827331542969 + ], + [ + 434.1727294921875, + 534.5827331542969 + ], + [ + 434.1727294921875, + 568.7160949707031 + ], + [ + 135.788818359375, + 568.7160949707031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2004 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 286, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 384.15478515625, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 384.15478515625, + 585.8180999755859 + ], + [ + 220.17000000000002, + 585.8180999755859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 115", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 344.078857421875, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 344.078857421875, + 201.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 201.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 439.6238098144531, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 439.6238098144531, + 229.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 229.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2004 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 389.7987060546875, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 389.7987060546875, + 257.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 225.70499999999998, + 257.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 116", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 344.5080871582031, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 344.5080871582031, + 477.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 477.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 440.1269836425781, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 440.1269836425781, + 505.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 505.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "December 2004 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 391.3214416503906, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 391.3214416503906, + 533.4199829101562 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 533.4199829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 117", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.5550231933594, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 339.5550231933594, + 147.53997802734375 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 147.53997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 434.8669738769531, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 434.8669738769531, + 175.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 175.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.01, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 381.7014465332031, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 381.7014465332031, + 203.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 230.01, + 203.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 118", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 339.2606506347656, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 339.2606506347656, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 419.58000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 434.9823913574219, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 434.9823913574219, + 449.96710205078125 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 449.96710205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 378.4597473144531, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 378.4597473144531, + 477.1189270019531 + ], + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 477.1189270019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.0604248046875, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 331.485, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 331.485, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 261.0604248046875, + 90.72 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.13487243652344, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 428.03999999999996, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 428.03999999999996, + 120.010986328125 + ], + [ + 167.13487243652344, + 120.010986328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2005 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.2379608154297, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 372.68999999999994, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 372.68999999999994, + 148.30706787109375 + ], + [ + 223.2379608154297, + 148.30706787109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT \n12D ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 364.8808898925781, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 364.8808898925781, + 364.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 364.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.41999999999996, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 435.41999999999996, + 393.04351806640625 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 393.04351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 406.78887939453125 + ], + [ + 380.0720520019531, + 406.78887939453125 + ], + [ + 380.0720520019531, + 421.16351318359375 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 421.16351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 121", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 296, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.14, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 340.3764343261719, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 340.3764343261719, + 638.63818359375 + ], + [ + 268.14, + 638.63818359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 296, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 434.52142333984375, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 434.52142333984375, + 669.650749206543 + ], + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 669.650749206543 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2005 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 389.4928894042969, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 389.4928894042969, + 92.6982421875 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 92.6982421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 122", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.94, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 341.94, + 310.54351806640625 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 310.54351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.4099884033203, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 436.03499999999997, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 436.03499999999997, + 339.04351806640625 + ], + [ + 176.4099884033203, + 339.04351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.145, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.145, + 367.16351318359375 + ], + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 367.16351318359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 123", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.05780029296875, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 341.05780029296875, + 584.7191925048828 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 584.7191925048828 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 436.8581848144531, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 436.8581848144531, + 613.7879486083984 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 613.7879486083984 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2005 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.935, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 383.9651184082031, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 383.9651184082031, + 643.0036315917969 + ], + [ + 226.935, + 643.0036315917969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 124", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 301, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 342.9250183105469, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 342.9250183105469, + 256.300048828125 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 256.300048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 301, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 284.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 284.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 301, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 385.3114318847656, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 385.3114318847656, + 312.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 228.16499999999996, + 312.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 125", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 302, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 342.2732238769531, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 342.2732238769531, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 527.3100000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A$ O Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 302, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.00274658203125, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 438.14697265625, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 438.14697265625, + 557.8646240234375 + ], + [ + 104.00274658203125, + 557.8646240234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2005 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 302, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 379.9989318847656, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 379.9989318847656, + 584.01 + ], + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 584.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 126", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 304, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 344.5267639160156, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 344.5267639160156, + 201.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 201.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 304, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 440.05145263671875, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 440.05145263671875, + 229.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 229.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2005 - Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 304, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 378.4874267578125, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 378.4874267578125, + 258.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 258.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 127", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 305, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 344.79425048828125, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 344.79425048828125, + 475.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 475.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 305, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.35, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.4969787597656, + 486.80999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.4969787597656, + 503.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 178.35, + 503.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2005 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 305, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.235, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 379.442626953125, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 379.442626953125, + 531.1799926757812 + ], + [ + 239.235, + 531.1799926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 128", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 307, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.6, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.6280822753906, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.6280822753906, + 146.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 270.6, + 146.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 307, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.2461853027344, + 174.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 174.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 307, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.39, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 377.1955261230469, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 377.1955261230469, + 203.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 237.39, + 203.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 129", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 308, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 343.39178466796875, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 343.39178466796875, + 420.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 420.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 308, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 438.8738098144531, + 448.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 448.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 308, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 372.8913269042969, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 372.8913269042969, + 477.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 242.31000000000003, + 477.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 130", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 310, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.14, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 341.9220886230469, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 341.9220886230469, + 94.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 268.14, + 94.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 310, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.7538146972656, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 437.7538146972656, + 123.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 123.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Aprl 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 310, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 370.617431640625, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 370.617431640625, + 150.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 239.85000000000002, + 150.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 16\\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 311, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.295, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 342.5439758300781, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 342.5439758300781, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 266.295, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursueriet-tN8 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 311, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.20880126953125, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.20880126953125, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 172.20000000000002, + 394.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2005 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 311, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 368.2037048339844, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 368.2037048339844, + 422.2432556152344 + ], + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 422.2432556152344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 132", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 312, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 343.43853759765625, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 343.43853759765625, + 639.5500030517578 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 639.5500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 312, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 652.6875 + ], + [ + 438.6169738769531, + 652.6875 + ], + [ + 438.6169738769531, + 667.6800079345703 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 667.6800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 313, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 375.9818420410156, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 375.9818420410156, + 92.88140869140625 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 92.88140869140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 133", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 314, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.68, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 338.7371826171875, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 338.7371826171875, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 265.68, + 311.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 5 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 314, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.97, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 434.3813171386719, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 434.3813171386719, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 170.97, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2005 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 314, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 366.8138427734375, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 366.8138427734375, + 369.2884521484375 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 369.2884521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 134", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 315, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 341.13677978515625, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 341.13677978515625, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 582.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 315, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 436.9369812011719, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 436.9369812011719, + 612.36 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 612.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 315, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.925, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 370.80462646484375, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 370.80462646484375, + 640.1403961181641 + ], + [ + 242.925, + 640.1403961181641 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 135", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 317, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.445, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 344.52447509765625, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 344.52447509765625, + 256.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 272.445, + 256.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 317, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 439.3669738769531, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 439.3669738769531, + 284.8000183105469 + ], + [ + 177.73499999999999, + 284.8000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2005 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 317, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.77, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 372.7763671875, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 372.7763671875, + 312.9200134277344 + ], + [ + 244.77, + 312.9200134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 136", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 318, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.525, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 338.8627624511719, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 338.8627624511719, + 528.5362243652344 + ], + [ + 267.525, + 528.5362243652344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 318, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.788818359375, + 534.5827331542969 + ], + [ + 434.18402099609375, + 534.5827331542969 + ], + [ + 434.18402099609375, + 568.7160949707031 + ], + [ + 135.788818359375, + 568.7160949707031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "May 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 318, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 366.9179382324219, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 366.9179382324219, + 586.42431640625 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 586.42431640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 137", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 320, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 342.50177001953125, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 342.50177001953125, + 200.88 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 200.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 320, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 437.5431823730469, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 437.5431823730469, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 230.03999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 320, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 375.8465881347656, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 375.8465881347656, + 257.58 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 257.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 138", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 321, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.7159729003906, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 268.7159729003906, + 473.03999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Gaut) of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 321, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 434.18999999999994, + 503.7401428222656 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 503.7401428222656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 321, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.62, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 370.1308898925781, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 370.1308898925781, + 529.74 + ], + [ + 238.62, + 529.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 139", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 323, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 344.2947692871094, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 344.2947692871094, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 323, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.505, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.83197021484375, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 438.83197021484375, + 174.388916015625 + ], + [ + 176.505, + 174.388916015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2005 \u2014 Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 323, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.12640380859375, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.12640380859375, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 241.07999999999998, + 202.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 140", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 324, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 340.0793762207031, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 340.0793762207031, + 420.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 420.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 324, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 449.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 449.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "June 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 324, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 371.1955261230469, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 371.1955261230469, + 477.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 477.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 141", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 326, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.06, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.11871337890625, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.11871337890625, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 273.06, + 91.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 326, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 439.3937072753906, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 439.3937072753906, + 120.3763427734375 + ], + [ + 177.11999999999998, + 120.3763427734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 326, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 375.06158447265625, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 375.06158447265625, + 148.9039306640625 + ], + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 148.9039306640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 142 .)\u2022\u2022", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 327, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.295, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 345.9202575683594, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 345.9202575683594, + 373.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 266.295, + 373.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to\\ f/8 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 327, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.97, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.3669738769531, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 433.3669738769531, + 394.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 170.97, + 394.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 327, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 366.6896667480469, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 366.6896667480469, + 422.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 238.00500000000002, + 422.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 143", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 328, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 341.5715026855469, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 341.5715026855469, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 638.2800000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 328, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 437.3719787597656, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 437.3719787597656, + 666.6967620849609 + ], + [ + 175.27499999999998, + 666.6967620849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2005 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 329, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 375.6807556152344, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 375.6807556152344, + 93.338134765625 + ], + [ + 244.15500000000003, + 93.338134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 144", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 330, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 342.1480407714844, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 342.1480407714844, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 309.42 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 330, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 437.19866943359375, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 437.19866943359375, + 338.6388854980469 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 338.6388854980469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "July 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 330, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.465, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 370.4727478027344, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 370.4727478027344, + 367.1664123535156 + ], + [ + 240.465, + 367.1664123535156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 145", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 331, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 340.3780822753906, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 340.3780822753906, + 585.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 585.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 331, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 435.6169738769531, + 613.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 613.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 331, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 380.2014465332031, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 380.2014465332031, + 641.4199981689453 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 641.4199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 146", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 333, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.14, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 339.23944091796875, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 339.23944091796875, + 256.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 268.14, + 256.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 333, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.815, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 435.2461853027344, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 435.2461853027344, + 284.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 172.815, + 284.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 333, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 376.7509460449219, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 376.7509460449219, + 312.9200134277344 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 312.9200134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 147", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 334, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.14, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 338.4888000488281, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 338.4888000488281, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 268.14, + 528.9300000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 334, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.4250946044922, + 534.1864318847656 + ], + [ + 433.82403564453125, + 534.1864318847656 + ], + [ + 433.82403564453125, + 568.3197937011719 + ], + [ + 135.4250946044922, + 568.3197937011719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ar\"\u2022\\- August 2005 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 334, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.8360824584961, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 375.2681579589844, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 375.2681579589844, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 104.8360824584961, + 585.6299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 148", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 336, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.83, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 345.2118835449219, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 345.2118835449219, + 201.1986083984375 + ], + [ + 271.83, + 201.1986083984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 336, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 440.0277404785156, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 440.0277404785156, + 232.031982421875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 232.031982421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "August 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 336, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.70000000000002, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.8192443847656, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.8192443847656, + 258.68756103515625 + ], + [ + 233.70000000000002, + 258.68756103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 149", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 337, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.37, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 340.4322814941406, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 340.4322814941406, + 476.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 269.37, + 476.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CauT of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 337, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 435.9969787597656, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 435.9969787597656, + 504.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 504.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(S , September 2005 \u2014 Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 337, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.50999450683594, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 391.0714416503906, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 391.0714416503906, + 532.2999877929688 + ], + [ + 153.50999450683594, + 532.2999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 339, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.30999755859375, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 338.25000000000006, + 145.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 274.30999755859375, + 145.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 339, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.02999877929688, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 436.65, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 436.65, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 176.02999877929688, + 174.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 339, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.26998901367188, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 389.2950000000001, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 389.2950000000001, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 223.26998901367188, + 202.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 151", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 340, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.90999999999997, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 338.09130859375, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 338.09130859375, + 418.77 + ], + [ + 266.90999999999997, + 418.77 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 340, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 433.22259521484375, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 433.22259521484375, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 171.58500000000004, + 447.12000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2005 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 340, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.555, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 385.8811950683594, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 385.8811950683594, + 475.9471740722656 + ], + [ + 219.555, + 475.9471740722656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 152", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 342, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 343.0251770019531, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 343.0251770019531, + 92.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 92.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 342, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 438.2469787597656, + 120.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 120.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "September 2005 \u2014 Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 342, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 391.6814270019531, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 391.6814270019531, + 148.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 223.24499999999998, + 148.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NTN COU", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 343, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.68, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 335.79, + 368.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 265.68, + 368.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursua4to 8 U.S.C. $ 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 343, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 434.1269836425781, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 434.1269836425781, + 396.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 170.35500000000002, + 396.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2005 - Incident 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 343, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.32, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.0774841308594, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.0774841308594, + 424.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 226.32, + 424.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 154", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 344, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.985, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 341.4250183105469, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 341.4250183105469, + 640.6699981689453 + ], + [ + 269.985, + 640.6699981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 344, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.045, + 653.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 653.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 436.7469787597656, + 669.1700134277344 + ], + [ + 174.045, + 669.1700134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2005 \u2014 Incident 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 345, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.935, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 378.6896667480469, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 378.6896667480469, + 93.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 226.935, + 93.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 155", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 346, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.755, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 341.5080871582031, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 341.5080871582031, + 313.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 268.755, + 313.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 346, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 437.5061950683594, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 437.5061950683594, + 341.78997802734375 + ], + [ + 173.42999999999998, + 341.78997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2005 - Incident 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 346, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.3326416015625, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.3326416015625, + 369.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 228.78000000000003, + 369.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 156", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 347, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 343.02447509765625, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 343.02447509765625, + 585.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 271.21500000000003, + 585.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 347, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.89, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 438.6169738769531, + 597.78 + ], + [ + 438.6169738769531, + 613.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 175.89, + 613.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "October 2005 - Incident 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 347, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.24, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 383.1955261230469, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 383.1955261230469, + 641.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 231.24, + 641.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 349, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 386.6397705078125, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 386.6397705078125, + 257.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 224.47500000000002, + 257.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.09, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.01, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.01, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 225.09, + 54.269999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. (a) PLAINTIFFS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 30.75, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 116.85000000000001, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 116.85000000000001, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 30.75, + 99.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.65, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 381.29999999999995, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 381.29999999999995, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 313.65, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an \"X\" in One Box Only)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 30.75, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 159.9, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 159.9, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 30.75, + 239.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an \"X\" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 282.9, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 578.0999999999999, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 578.0999999999999, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 282.9, + 247.04999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an \"X\" in One Box Only)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 350, + "polygon": [ + [ + 30.75, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 221.39999999999998, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 221.39999999999998, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 30.75, + 330.48 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 106 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 78 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 399 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 222 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 275 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 309 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 307 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 303 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 313 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 300 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 330 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 333 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 325 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 331 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 330 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 318 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 307 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 308 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 323 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 338 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 300 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 336 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 317 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 310 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 336 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 304 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 317 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 328 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 314 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 318 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 258, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 259, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 260, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 261, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 262, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 263, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 264, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 265, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 266, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 267, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 268, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 269, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 270, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 271, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 272, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 320 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 273, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 274, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 323 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 275, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 276, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 277, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 278, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 279, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 315 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 280, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 323 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 281, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 282, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 313 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 283, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 284, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 285, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 301 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 286, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 308 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 287, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 328 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 288, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 289, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 290, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 324 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 291, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 292, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 306 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 293, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 294, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 313 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 295, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 296, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 315 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 297, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 298, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 299, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 308 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 300, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 334 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 301, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 302, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 312 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 303, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 333 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 304, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 305, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 306, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 307, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 308, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 309, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 310, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 311, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 334 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 312, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 313, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 314, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 320 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 315, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 314 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 316, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 334 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 317, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 318, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 309 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 319, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 326 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 320, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 309 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 321, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 322 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 322, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 324 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 323, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 324, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 325, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 326, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 300 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 327, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 328, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 318 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 329, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 316 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 330, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 314 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 331, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 332, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 335 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 333, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 334, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 313 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 335, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 325 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 336, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 309 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 337, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 338, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 339, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 340, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 341, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 342, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 343, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 344, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 345, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 346, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 347, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 348, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 349, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 350, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 53 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761329" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_114_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_114_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a1fd4e9959dd09c6ad2740aefbded6f320df9e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_114_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4c6d775db82e76eff71d0807408fd6c76a982ad5fde5457bc0c09110934918d2 +size 24114 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_82_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_82_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9670f86f80b1aa2f020aec3ac19d57fa1e4c12d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_82_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9da0f9dc9e0e754839b52d6b0c227043cac9af8f8eb4fc12f3e417e14bdb17cc +size 6699 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_89_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_89_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66aab8b771fbabb9213b1df410514743c40e4203 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_89_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:de7293b66fabab1479d7fd2dbe33d04502a62505473c10b423a78827073389ca +size 6392 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_93_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_93_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7182a3488038b3da184847f97f6fbea83234e7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761329/_page_93_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0a947c7dc9c010960a9294671b897e795ca357b5df22ee4c81352fd9ba3fb717 +size 5757 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d4c21fca67b0d6bd5c891465f338ee4a1ee1f26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.md @@ -0,0 +1,1446 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 2 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motiop4 : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.9** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:09-cv-81092-KAM + +L.M. v.(Espstein) + +Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra + +Demand: \$1,000,000 + +Cause: 28:1391 Personal Injury + +#### Plaintiff + +L.M. + +V. + +#### Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +Date Filed: 07/24/2009 + +Date Terminated: 07/20/2010 + +Jury Demand: Plaintiff + +Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: + +Jurisdiction: Federal + +represented by + +\* j mail: brad@pathtojustice.com + +erdale, FL 33301 + +4-2820 + +954-524-2822 + +LEAD ATTORNEY + +ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +represented by Michael James Pike + +Pike & Lustig, LLP + +2465 Mercer Avenue + +Suite 204 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-2918 + +561-512-6537 + +Email: pike®bigfirmaltemative.com + +LEAD ATTORNEY + +ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. + +Critton Luttier & Coleman + +303 Banyan Boulevard + +Suite 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-2918 + +561-842-2820 + +Fax: 561-253-0164 + +Email: rcrit@lawcic.com + +#### LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +#### Material Witness + +Jean Luc Bruhnel + +| Date Filed | # | Docket Text | +|------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 07/24/2009 | 1 | COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Jeffrey Epstein! Filing fee \$ 350.00 Receipt#: 546977, filed by L.M. (Attachments: # 1 part 2 of complaint, # 2 part 3 of complaint)(vt) (Entered: 07/27/2009) | +| 07/24/2009 | 2 | MOTION to Keep True Name in Sealed Envelope. (vt) (Entered: 07/27/2009) | +| 07/24/2009 | 3 | MOTION To Proceed Anonymously by L.M. (vt) (Entered: 07/27/2009) | +| 07/29/2009 | 4 | ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Kenneth A. Marra for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 7/29/09. Judge James I. Cohn no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 7/28/2009. (ail) (Entered: 07/30/2009) | +| 07/30/2009 | 5 | Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/30/2009. (ir) (Entered: 07/30/2009) | +| 08/11/2009 | 6 | Hereinafter, this case shall be consolidated with the related Epstein cases (08-80119) for purposes of discovery and for procedural motions relating to multiple cases. This is a paperless order.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/11/2009. (mkz) (Entered: 08/11/2009) | +| 08/19/2009 | 7 | Clerks Notice to Filer re (274 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Notice (Other). Docket text does not match document; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter a title in the docket text that matches the title of the document. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(tp) (Entered: 08/19/2009) | +| 11/09/2009 | 8 | Third Party MOTION for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Igor Zinoview. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 11/09/2009) | +| 11/16/2009 | 9 | REPLY to Response to Motion re (405 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence ( Reply to Response of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.'s ) filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 11/16/2009) | + +**APP.10** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +d + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 08-80893CIV —MARRA/a + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +#### Re-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plain E, will take the deposition of Donald-Trump on, August 18, 2009, at 11:0k at: + +Esquire Court Reporters One Penn Plaza Suite 4715 New York, NY 1011 ' + +The deposition shall ducted pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and shall continue day t6 weekends and holidays excepted, until completed. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served by U.S. Mall and email transmission this //?day of August, 2009 to all those on the attached Service List. + +**ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER** + +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Tel: (954) 522-3456 + +Fax: (954) 527-8663 + +Email: [bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com) + +By: + +![]()BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ. + +Florida Bar No.: 542075 + +cc: Esquire Court Reports + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +## Service List + +09-22785 + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. + BURMAN, CRITTON, ET AL. + 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +09-22785 + +Jay Howell & Assoc., + 644 Cesery Boulevard, + Suite 250, + Jacksonville, FL 32211 + +09-22785 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., + Atterbury Goldberger et al., + 250 Australian Ave. South, + Suite 1400, + West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +09-22785 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esq. + 382 South 1400 E + Room 101 + Salt Lake Cirty, UT 84112 + +09-22785 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. + Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + 250 Australian Avenue South + Suite 1400 + West Palm Beach, FL33401-5012 + +09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + +09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + +09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + +09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + +09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + 09-22785 + +NOT CERTIFIED COPY + +JANE DOE, + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 08-80893CIV —MARRA' + +Plaintiff, vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +• Defendant. + +## Re-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITJON + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, JANE DOE, will take the deposition of Donald-Trump on, September 24, 2009, at 1:00 t + +Esquire Court Reporters \ One Penn Plaza Suite 4715 New York, NY 10119 / ..Acial + +The deposition shallconducted pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and shall continue day to d kends and holidays excepted, until completed. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served by U.S. Mall and email transmission this a+ day of August, 2009 to all those on the attached Service List. + +**ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER** + +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Tel: (954) 522-3456 + +Fax: (954) 527-8663 + +Email: [bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com) + +By: + +![]()BRAD [REDACTED], ESQ. + +Florida Bar No.: 542075 + +cc: Esquire Court Reports + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +**APP.11** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +E.W., + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +FILE NO. 502048GP00,3626YAXAMI3 + +502in CI) D 91Z05\8 '1)& 7 + +## i PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY UPON LAND + +Comes Now Plaintiff, EW, by and through underdig idjbounsel and pursuant to 1.350(a)(3) Fla.R.Civ.P., and requests the following; + +- 1. To enter Defendant Jeffrey Epstebls,prop'erty located at 358 El Bulb Way, West Palm Beach, FL 33480 N>>' +- 2. Inspect the entire prone ated at that location, including but not limited to the driveway, the i9tikor obthe house, each and every room in the house, the massage tableyttikbrard, the swimming area and all other areas located on said prert +- 3. To take video and/or photographs of the property and inspection. + +\ According to Palm Beach County Property Appraiser, this property is approximately C41223, exclusive of the outside area, and thus it Is anticipated that the Inspection ill e approximately 4 hours. In addition to the undersigned, the inspection will be-alerkled by other lawyers with the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, a videographer and members of the video team, a photographer and members of the photography team and other persons to assist in the process. These people attending the inspection are available for the inspection to take place on Friday, August 28, 2009 to begin at the property at 10:00 a.m. The undersigned will work with Defendant to agree on a mutually acceptable time and date above is not convenient for Defendant. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting it's Request for Entry Upon Land requiring the Defendant, Epstein, to schedule such entry on Friday, August 28, 2009 at 10:00 a.m., or in the alternative, no later than twenty days following entry of the Courts Order granting same. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served by mail this 10th day of August, 2009 to: Robert D. Griffon, Jr., Esq., Burman, Critton, et al., 515 North Flagl r Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +> ROTHSTEIN ROSENF Et LER Attorneys for Plaintiff 401 East Las Cies B tilt 1650 Fort Lauderdale 33394 Telephone (95'4) 22J 456 Telecopier ( )• -8663 + +By:, teEted10J. ec`Floffila Barrio. 542075 IiedwardS(ahrra-law.com William J. Berger Florida Bar No. 197701 wberoerOrra-law.com + +HABrad EdwardABJE Cases1MIBer, 22783pRequast for Eniry Upon land.doe + +**APP.12** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +L.M., + +CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +**EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING +DEPOSITIONS OF [REDACTED] VISOSKI AND DAVID HART ROGERS** + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Pla. Re Civ. P. 1.280(c), moves for a protective order regarding the depositions of [REDACTED] Visoski and David Hart Rogers and states: + +1. 1. On August 24, 2009, Plaintiff, L.M., noticed the depositions of [REDACTED] Paul Visoski, Jr. and David Hart Rogers. See Notices of Deposition attached as Exhibits A & B.1 +2. 2. The subpoenas duces tecum attached to the deposition notices request: + All original flight logs from January, 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets which you piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. +3. 3. The foregoing document request is overbroad, not relevant or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. +4. 4. The conduct alleged by LM is limited to the time frame: "[b]eginning in approximately August 2002 and continuing until approximately September 2005." See Second Am. Compl. +5. 5. LM does not allege that any tortious conduct occurred before August 2002 or after September 2005. Ergo, there is no conceivable relevance of flight logs outside this time period. + +1 The deposition of Mr. Visoski was renoticed for October 15, 2009 and the deposition of Mr. Rogers was renoticed for October 13, 2009. See Re-Notices of Taking Deposition attached as Exhibits C & D, respectively. + +6. Accordingly, the Court should enter a protective order limiting the time period for the flight logs requested in the subpoenas duces tecum to the August 2002 through September 2005. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court enter a protective order limiting the subpoenas duces tecum to [REDACTED] Visoski and David Hart Rogers to the time period August 2002 through September 2005 and grant any further relief the Court deems just and proper. + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax, and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 13th day of October, 2009: + +Brad [REDACTED], Esq. (*also via hand delivery*) +Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler +401 East Las Olas Boulevard +Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-522-3456 Phone +954-527-8663 Fax +*Counsel for Plaintiff* + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jay Howell, Esq. +Jay Howell & Associates, P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard +Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +904-680-1234 Phone +904-680-1238 Fax +*Co-counsel for Plaintiff* + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2828 +(561) 515-3148 Fax + +![]() + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION + +L.M., ) + +) + +Plaintiff, ) + +) ) ) ) ) + +1 + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +# NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION • C + +PLEASE. TAKE NOTICE that the attorney for will take the deposition of 10:00 a.m. for the purposes of discovery at the the above-styled cause on October 8, 2009 at ° location: + +Esquire Court Reporters 515 N Flagier Dr West Palm Beach, FL 33 + +Said deposition will b ore ESQUIRE COURT REPORTERS, a Notary Public or any officer au •adrninister oaths by the laws of the State of Florida, and.a person who i a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties o i neither a relative nor 'employee of such attorney or counsel, and who Is,p6f is an tally Interested in the action. + +deposition will be taken pursuant to Florida.Rules of Civil Procedure in such cas provided. Said oral examination will continue from hour to hour and from day to day until completed. + +EXHIBITA- + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and Facsimile this 2nd day of August, 2009 to: Michael Burman, Esq., & Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., Burman, Critton, et al., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jay Howell, Esq., Jay Howell & Assoc., 644 Gesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211; and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, +Attorneys for Plaintiff +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 +Telephone (954) 522-3456 +Telecopier (954) 527-8663 + +By: + +![]()copies Furnished to: Esquire Court Reporters + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION + +L.M., + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XX>01 u at that time and place the following: + +All original fli gs from January, 1998 through present for any and all alrcraffiktirpla s/Jets which you piloted or co-piloted that were owned or conal d by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. + +u fall to appear, you may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed 'Gar by the following attorneys and unless excused from this Subpoena by these atto eys or the Court you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +DATED on August242009. + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +![]()For The Court + +**Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler** +401 East Las Olas Blvd +Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +Florida Bar No.: 542075 +(954) 522-3456 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION + +LM., ) + +) + +Plaintiff, ) CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +) ) ) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) + +) + +Defendant. ) + +) + +#### Re-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITI + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attorney fo will take the deposition of Larry Visoski on Oc purposes of discovery at the following locati the above-styled cause 1 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for the + +Esquire Court Reporters 515 N Flagler Dr West Palm Beach, FL 33A + +At Said deposition will e eke), afore ESQUIRE COURT REPORTERS, a Notary Public or any officer authonied4 administer oaths by the laws of the State of Florida, and a person w o is n r a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties, o is neither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who tally Interested In the action. + +ieldejaoSition will be taken pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure In such efierningtion will contInue.frorythoUr to..h0ttr.arid. from day to 'day until completed. + +Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and Email Transmital, this 2/4 day of October, 2009 to: Michael Burman, Esq., & Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., Burman, Critton, et al., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jay Howell, Esq., Jay Howell & Assoc., 644 Gesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211; and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +ROTHSTEIN [REDACTED] NEELDT ADLER +Attorneys for Plaintiff +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 +Telephone (954) 522-3456 +Telecopier (954) 527-8663 + +By: + +![]()copies Furnished for Esquire Court Reporters + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION + +L.M., ) + +) + +Plaintiff, ) CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +) + +vs. ) + +) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) + +) + +Defendant. ) + +) + +#### Re-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSIT + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attorney ifo P pIu n the above-styled cause will take the deposition of DAVID HART ROG R NOc ber 13, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for the purposes of discovery at the following . o + +Esquire Court Reporters 515 N Flagler Dr West Palm Beach, FL 3 + +Said deposition will stake before.ESQUIRE COURT REPORTERS, a Notary Public or any officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the State of Florida, and a person )o is n I h r a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties.al Y is neither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is daily interested in the action. + +id deposition will be taken pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in such cases provIdel,. aakLorak examination.will tontinue from hour-to-hour-and-from-day-to - - - day until completed. + +EXHiBirp. + +Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and Email Transmittal, this ~~9/6~~ day of October, 2009 to: Michael Burman, Esq., & Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., Burman, Critton, et al., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jay Howell, Esq., Jay Howell & Assoc., 644 Gesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211; and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +ROTHSTEIN [REDACTED] NEELOT ADLER +Attorneys for Plaintiff +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 +Telephone (954) 522-3456 +Telecopier (954) 527-8663 + +By: + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Florida Bar No. 542075 +bedwards@rra-law.com +William J. Berger +Florida Bar No. 197701 +wberger@rra-law.com + +copies Furnished to: Esquire Court Reporters + +**APP. 13** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_34_Picture_46.jpeg) + +[Home](#) → [Collections](#) → [Investment](#) + +![](_page_34_Picture_48.jpeg) + +**Related Articles** + +- Ex-Rothstein partner Stuart Rosenfeldt changed with... May 22, 2014 +- Scott Rothstein partner Stuart Rosenfeldt pleads Fifth... July 2, 2010 +- Stuart Rosenfeldt: Rru Will Go Down in History in Sama... November 2, 2009 +- Stuart Rosenfeldt Named "leader Of Year" Before Rru... November 21, 2009 +- Rothstein partner Adler sued for \$1.2 million February 8, 2010 + +**Find More Stories About** + +[Investment](#) + +**Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true** + +*Many wondered how he did it now they're finding out:* + +November 3, 2009 | By Belly Kestin, Jon Burstein and Brittany Wallman, South Florida Sun-Sentinel + +For years, Broward County's socially and politically connected marveled at the astonishing success of Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein and wondered: How does he do it? + +Answers may have begun to emerge Monday, even as the law firm. Rothstein built and the image he cultivated as an altruistic philanthropist crumbled. + +According to a lawsuit filed against him by his firm and its co-founding partner, Rothstein was running a covert investment scheme on the side and may have walked away with "substantial sums" entrusted to him by investors: + +The scope of the investment business is not known, but the Fort Lauderdale securities litigation firm Sonni & Erez said Monday it is investigating claims that Rothstein "may be involved in a \$100 million investment that imploded." + +Rothstein attracted investors by promising huge returns and setting settlements he said he'd reached in sex discrimination and whistle-blower cases, documents he gave prospective clients show. + +But according to the lawsuit filed against him, at least some of those settlements did not exist, and investors say money they invested with Rothstein is now missing. + +Rothstein was believed to be out of the country Monday, but his attorney said he intends to return to South Florida and "straighten this thing out." + +Alain Sakowitz, a Miami lawyer and developer, told the Sun Sentinel he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor three times, but quickly became suspicious. + +"I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scott was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake settlements," Sakowitz said. + +An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment. A spokesman for Banyan Income Fund, an investment group that collected \$95 million and invested an undisclosed amount with Rothstein, said it contacted federal prosecutors in recent days with concerns about "suspicious activity." + +Rothstein's "allegedly improper activities were done without any knowledge of the other attorneys at the firm," the lawsuit by Rothstein's firm asserts. + +At the law firm's headquarters in downtown Fort Lauderdale, Rothstein used an office with a private entrance. Stuart Rosenfeldt, his co-founding partner, told the Sun Sentinel several of their co-workers may have done work for the investment business without realizing its scope or nature. + +Rothstein's uncle also worked at the firm. Rosenfeldt said he also vanished in recent days. + +Over the years, Rosenfeldt said, Rothstein lied to him, but he added, "The kinds of small lies I caught him in were nothing to lead you to conclude your partner was running a giant scam out of your law firm." + +Rothstein's confidential offerings obtained by the Sun Sentinel describe extremely high-paying but largely unregulated investment opportunities. + +One from August offered investors a 36 percent return in three months, far more than the troubled end bond markets. + +Those documents say that Rothstein's firm sought out sexual discrimination and whistle-blower cases and used former cops to dig up incriminating evidence. + +Sakowitz, the potential investor, said Rothstein boasted of having sophisticated cavesdropping equipment and that former cops would slit through potential defendants' garbage. + +"These types of cases are highly confidential and thus, quite fucrative, because the defendants place a high premium on keeping the details of the case confidential," one investment offering said. + +Rothstein claimed to have a "huge volume of cases, an employer sleeping with the secretary or receptionist," Sakowitz said. + +Once a settlement was reached, the defendant typically preferred to stretch the payments out over time. Rothstein offered his clients a way to avoid waiting for the money by giving them a lesser amount, but in a lump sum up front, Sakowitz said. + +Investors funded the payments to clients and would receive the full settlement amount in three to 12 months, with a guaranteed minimum 20 percent return, according to the investment offering. + +In a \$4 million settlement, an investor would make \$1 million in seven months. + +Sakowitz said Rothstein offered him a \$240,000 profit in three months, an offer he considered too good to be true. + +"It was virtually no risk," Sakowitz said. "These were so filled with red flags we just couldn't get our hands around it being legitimate." + +He said Rothstein told him he'd been doing such investment deals for seven years. + +Mark F. Raymond, managing partner of Broad and Cassel law firm in Miami, said he persuaded at least one client not to invest. + +"Every time I heard about them I just said, 'No way,'" Raymond said. + +A distraught Rosenfeldt said Monday he feared that Rothstein had destroyed the firm's reputation. + +"I think we're going to go down in history in the same breath as [Bernie] Madoff," he said. + +Staff Writers Peter Franceschina and Harriel Brackey contributed to this report. Sally Kestin can be reached at [skestin@sunsentinel.com](mailto:skestin@sunsentinel.com) or 954-356-4510. + +From the Web + +Sponsored Links by Taboola + +Win \$2.6 MM + \$5K A Week For Life with a Simple Entry! + +Publishers Clearing House + +Shoppers Are Getting Unbelievable Deals With This Little-Known Site + +Toplister + +12 Amazingly Cool Gadgets Flying Off Shelves In West Palm Beach: + +Lifed + +Florida Homeowners Born Before 1985 Get A Big Pay Day + +SimirtFinancialDaily + +Two Banks That Pay 10 Times The Interest On Your Savings + +MyTinsace Bank Referrals + +Nutritionist Tells All: "It's The Best Digestive Solution No One's Talking About" + +Heartland Nutrients Supplement + +The Most Daring Emmy Dresses of All Time. + +Livingly + +This Secret German Program Was Only Discovered After WWII + +DirectExpose + +**APP. 14** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_37_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy + +By Bob Norman + +published PrL.Nor 6 200.) 0 ocenALI + +A key question regardingScott Rothsteln's fraudulent scbcmu that until now has gone largely unanswered: How did be lure so many rich and powerful locals to pour tens of millions into the estimated billion-dollar Ponri that imploded last weekend? + +![](_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg) + +One way he did it Ara by tricking investors intobelieving that his firm was representing numerous underaged girls who had sex with Palm teach billionaire and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, sources have confined. On top of that, Rothstein claimed that be had flight logs showing that Epstein flew extremely prominent people, Including former President Rill Clinton, on his private jet with some of dm plaintiffs. + +He told investors that Epstein, Clinton, andother celebrities involved basically bad no choice but to settle Mesecases and that it WU a veritable treasure-trove. They then ponied up millions to invest In the settlements, payout a portion of those settlements to the victims, and pocket the resL + +Problem: Rothstein, who is currently In talks with federal officials lifter returning from his run to atrinaren,was fabricating the story. lie took a shred of the truth— there were somecivil suits filed against Epstein, including at least one handled by the Rothstein . Rosenfeldt and Adler11mi -- and built It into a grandiose lie that promised hundreds of millious of dolLats in returns for Ms Investors. There apparently Is no Indication that the Rimier president, who was at one time a real friend of [Twain's, and other celebrity names bandied about torRothstea were + +involved In any way. Of course, hisinvestors didn't know this. The settlements were supposedly confidential, so they had to take Re brick'sword for it. Adding to the secrecy — and Rothstein's cover -- was the fact that many of the actual plaintiffs in the Epstein case were nucleated girls known only by initials. + +Even his claims about celebrities flying on Epstein's jet base seed In truth: It was well-kamm flew Clinton, Kevin Spacey, and Chris Tucker to Africa on an anti-AIDS mission in his private Boeing 727. + +I learned about Rothstein's use of the Epstein angle from a source dose to the case aud tont %MutateattorneyBM Scherer, who is representing multiple Rothstein Inventors. He confirmed that the Epstein ploy , used by Rothstein. + +"He used the [Epstein case) as a showpiece, as baltrsaid Schroer. That's the nay is mind all the money. He would use legitimate eases as brit for luring investors into fictional cases. All the cases heallegedlylpinfaueS wire fictional. I don't believe there was a cal one in there." 7 0' + +At least one legitimate case involriug Epstein and au undensged girl —iiririals13.1 were being handled by Rothstein Roseafeldt Adler lawyer William Berger, a former Palm Reach County Circuit Judge. Sources say theybelleve Berger wasn't Involved in Rothstein's scam. Efforts to reach the former judge weren't successful. + +![](_page_37_Picture_15.jpeg) + +One source close to the case said there were Drummer other ploys, though this me appears to have been one of Rothstein% more profitable creations. + +-DMA of the legitimate Epstein civil case as a car on the road; said the source. "Then think of that car driving off the road onto heavy terrain and !deicing into four-wheel drive.That's what happened here, and Rothstein was at the wheel.' + +Known Investorsand feeder funds include venture capitalist jaw. Von Allan,prominent end Morse, socialite art dealer Bonnie Barnet,and the Banyon Fund, which involved Fort Lauderdale businessmarliglain. There are many otbaswho contributed to what Scherer now estimates was a billion-dollar PonsI scheme. + +Rothstelo% fraudulent empire came meshingdown last weekend, sending his 70-lawyer lima Into a tailspin and receivership almost literally overnight. Rothstein fled to Morocco before returning Tuesday on a Gs. Bela now said to be in extensive talks with federal officials In hopes of cutting a plea deal. + +Epstein was hit yrith scandal more than taro years ago when it was discovered he was having sec with guderneed ably in leis Palm north mansion.Ile was charged by state authorities in 2oo6 and entered a pica deal last year. Since, he has been hounded by civil suits. + +![](_page_37_Picture_21.jpeg) + +**APP.15** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +VARIOUS REAL PROPERTIES PURCHASED BY OR WITH OR ON BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTIISTEIN, SPECIFICALLY: + +(I) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2307 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(2) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2308 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(3) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2316 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(4) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTE ( ES, S LOCATED AT 30 ISLA BAHIA DRD/ FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(5) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 29 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(6) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 350 SE 2n° STREET, UNIT 2840, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(7) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 380 CARRINGTON DRIVE, WESTON, FLORIDA; + +(8) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 2133 IMPERIAL POINT DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +Defendants. + +FILED BY VT D.C. +ELECTRONIC +Nov. 9, 2009 +STEVEN M. LARIMORE +CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. +S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI + +#### VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM + +Plaintiff, United States of America, hereby files this verified civil complaint for forfeiture in rem and states as follows: + +#### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +1. This is a civil action for forfeiture in rem for eight real properties, rfses, Legal Service, Companies and** Corporations,BusInese Trips, Crime \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed70d12668bc0aacd8050e15c1ea42862cf0e7e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/EFTA02761680.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3989 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 68, + "chars": 91555, + "elapsed_seconds": 33.0, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_34_Picture_46.jpeg", + "_page_34_Picture_48.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_21.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 390.9758605957031, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 390.9758605957031, + 231.66033935546875 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 231.66033935546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "U.S. District Court \nSouthern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) \nCIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:09-cv-81092-KAM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 463.4530944824219, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 463.4530944824219, + 118.863037109375 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 118.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiff", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 122.23068237304688, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 122.23068237304688, + 242.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 242.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 442.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 132.98548889160156, + 442.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 132.98548889160156, + 456.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 456.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEAD ATTORNEY \nATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 508.26800537109375, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 508.26800537109375, + 102.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 102.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Material Witness", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 111.9375 + ], + [ + 168.19012451171875, + 111.9375 + ], + [ + 168.19012451171875, + 126.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 126.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 402.67535400390625, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 402.67535400390625, + 120.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 120.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Re-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 311.4375 + ], + [ + 445.365966796875, + 311.4375 + ], + [ + 445.365966796875, + 326.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 326.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Service List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.07000732421875, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 412.15203857421875, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 412.15203857421875, + 82.7864990234375 + ], + [ + 215.07000732421875, + 82.7864990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Re-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITJON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 279.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 279.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.684, + 90.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 524.8682250976562, + 90.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 524.8682250976562, + 132.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 132.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY UPON LAND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 282.1875 + ], + [ + 439.5638427734375, + 282.1875 + ], + [ + 439.5638427734375, + 304.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 304.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.716, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 520.2, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 520.2, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 301.716, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS OF [REDACTED] VISOSKI AND DAVID HART ROGERS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 306.18 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 253.53000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 449.7626647949219, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 449.7626647949219, + 120.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 120.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION \u2022 C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 249.77581787109375 + ], + [ + 437.33599853515625, + 249.77581787109375 + ], + [ + 437.33599853515625, + 310.0494384765625 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 310.0494384765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 120.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 453.3706970214844, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 453.3706970214844, + 106.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 106.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 451.5048828125, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 451.5048828125, + 121.447021484375 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 121.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 391.74822998046875, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 391.74822998046875, + 297.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 297.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 120.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.89642333984375, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.89642333984375, + 108.43359375 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 108.43359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 432.7507019042969, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 432.7507019042969, + 148.44708251953125 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 148.44708251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Re-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.288, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 317.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 198.288, + 317.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 432.3706970214844, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 432.3706970214844, + 151.447021484375 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 151.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Re-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 320.1870422363281 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 320.1870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Related Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 274.59000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Find More Stories About", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 422.01000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 402.696, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 402.696, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 164.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.288, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.01788330078125, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.01788330078125, + 124.38043212890625 + ], + [ + 45.288, + 124.38043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.25, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 400.80548095703125, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 400.80548095703125, + 97.59405517578125 + ], + [ + 215.25, + 97.59405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.285, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 459.5967102050781, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 459.5967102050781, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 159.285, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.01, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 386.505126953125, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 386.505126953125, + 209.60302734375 + ], + [ + 230.01, + 209.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 437.6138000488281, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 437.6138000488281, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 437.6510009765625, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 437.6510009765625, + 225.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 225.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 3 & Lot 4 W 'A Blk 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.14, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 470.5616455078125, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 470.5616455078125, + 338.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 145.14, + 338.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 63", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.635, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 344.3711853027344, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 344.3711853027344, + 452.60302734375 + ], + [ + 214.635, + 452.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 35", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.635, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 344.2201843261719, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 344.2201843261719, + 566.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 214.635, + 566.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "350 Las Olas Place Condo Unit 2840", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.635, + 663.39 + ], + [ + 398.57623291015625, + 663.39 + ], + [ + 398.57623291015625, + 678.733024597168 + ], + [ + 214.635, + 678.733024597168 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sector 4 North 15346 B Lot 24 Blk A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.25, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 405.17333984375, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 405.17333984375, + 168.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 215.25, + 168.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Imperial Point 1 Sec 53-44 B Lot 11 Blk 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.25, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 430.41949462890625, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 430.41949462890625, + 282.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 215.25, + 282.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 386.1515197753906, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 386.1515197753906, + 311.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 311.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRST CLAIM F4FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 981(a)(1)(C) and 1343", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.10000000000002, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 402.963623046875, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 402.963623046875, + 410.60302734375 + ], + [ + 209.10000000000002, + 410.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 981(a)(1)(A) and 1957", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.72000000000003, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.6644287109375, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.6644287109375, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 201.72000000000003, + 466.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.45000000000005, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.9906921386719, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.9906921386719, + 83.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 264.45000000000005, + 83.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.605, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.62176513671875, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.62176513671875, + 98.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 262.605, + 98.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 399.61517333984375, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 399.61517333984375, + 95.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 217.09499999999997, + 95.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.9, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 458.35797119140625, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 458.35797119140625, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 159.9, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 386.505126953125, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 386.505126953125, + 209.60302734375 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 209.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.2337951660156, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.2337951660156, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 436.9010009765625, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 436.9010009765625, + 225.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 178.96499999999997, + 225.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 3 & Lot 4 W Blk 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.52499999999998, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 469.441650390625, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 469.441650390625, + 339.363037109375 + ], + [ + 144.52499999999998, + 339.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 63", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 343.25115966796875, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 343.25115966796875, + 452.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 452.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Isla Bahia 47-27 B Lot 35", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.7956237792969, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.7956237792969, + 565.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 565.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "350 Las Olas Place Condo Unit 2840", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 662.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 396.70623779296875, + 662.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 396.70623779296875, + 678.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 213.40499999999997, + 678.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sector 4 North 153-46 B Lot 24 Blk A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.25, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 405.17333984375, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 405.17333984375, + 168.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 215.25, + 168.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Imperial Point 1 Sec 53-44 B Lot 11 Blk 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.25, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 430.41949462890625, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 430.41949462890625, + 281.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 215.25, + 281.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.625, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 386.1515197753906, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 386.1515197753906, + 310.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 230.625, + 310.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRST CLAIM AT EITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 9810O(1)(C) and 1343", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.94500000000005, + 362.8143615722656 + ], + [ + 425.3754577636719, + 362.8143615722656 + ], + [ + 425.3754577636719, + 414.95111083984375 + ], + [ + 210.94500000000005, + 414.95111083984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7981(a)(1)(A) and 1957", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.72000000000003, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 409.8887634277344, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 409.8887634277344, + 466.85302734375 + ], + [ + 201.72000000000003, + 466.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.065, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 351.3161926269531, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 351.3161926269531, + 83.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 265.065, + 83.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.21999999999997, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 352.60595703125, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 352.60595703125, + 97.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 263.21999999999997, + 97.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme \nalone", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 41.61600000000001, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 524.3076171875, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 524.3076171875, + 149.6229248046875 + ], + [ + 41.61600000000001, + 149.6229248046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 59 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761680" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_46.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_46.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aee79b4d20d7ecd56db6191955addddd7ca7e20a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_46.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4c864fee483e07f020499767045ebca51f20eb8d465b5e378527fe9c0b8964fb +size 22429 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_48.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_48.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd6357753d29518391dac4e385b29e17ed73ede7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_34_Picture_48.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a310617b40ff746af50efab18f0dbd450ddc1deb5d477611717e5a1bb327726d +size 18892 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..690689bdf2f35ea19c08c9f35f91ff83466e9e2f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b614ea655858041b0182dcec2056e07f310236af65abc3041a205a3edd23e11 +size 28954 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27f9643cf94115613ae084cc56877d1d0c2de4a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5158c05317c69c3107732077055635d3f4e0bda1c19ec37d8d46379877e9a3ab +size 14424 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_21.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_21.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abb5cae56b18d86dac3cf555ef023929a36f965a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_21.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7adb5cb651220e0bfbae81bb836fd2785b97075527f59a49a64ae1d43c7d60c5 +size 14392 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..71cdec6e65294bcdf6f1a07a9314a4dbf8635988 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761680/_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3467db513bd107efc02169e48744485d88f96ab47e5d236d251defcd0fae19ca +size 16270 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..708f796edd98ae8e174d6235af647553931dad11 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.md @@ -0,0 +1,3368 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +# PART 3 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motiop4 : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.17** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT I 9 , D FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLO + +RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR, + +Plaintiffs, + +v. + +CASE NO.: + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, DAVID BODEN, DEBRA ~, ANDREW BARNETT, TD BANK, N.A., SPINOSA, JENNIFER KERSTE f TER ROSANNE CARETSKY, and 2Preve plead guilty to bank embezzlement charges in 1985 and received ten (10) years probation and a 510,000.00 fine for falsifying loan documents in connection with a scheme that resulted in losses exceeding \$2,300,000.00. + +# The Ponzi Scheme + +# The Rothstein Facade + +24. From humble beginnings in 2003, Rothstein built RRA into one of the fastest growing Florida-based law firms. Under Rothstein's stewardship, RRA grew from seven attorneys to over seventy and amassed over two hundred and fifty in staff. Along with its dramatic growth in size, RRA rapidly emerged as a legal, politi Nilanthropie powerhouse. + +25. Not surprisingly, Rothstein amassed an enormous portfolio of assets including more than sixteen real estate properties, twenty-five cars, an eighty-seven foot yacht, and various interests in a myriad of businesses ranging from watches to restaurants to vodka. Rothstein lived lavishly and spent prolifically--a critical initial component to set his scheme in motion. + +26. With RRA's tireless marketing efforts and meteoric rise into prominence, / Rothstein quickly made forays ci to mpreeminent social circles, rubbing elbows with high networth individuals and political Marks, the perfect breeding grounds to lure wealthy investors. His plot was up rnlitiming. + +# The Plan + +27. Rothstein seized upon his new found stature to entice investors into what would eventually become a Ponzi scheme using his budding employment and labor practice at RRA as his conduit. + +28. The scheme was predicated on the Principal Conspirators self-professed pipeline of pre-suit, confidential settlement agreements as the "preeminent sexual harassment and labor employment law firm in the country." Investors were told that the Principal Conspirators had an + +extensive in-house private investigative team, including former F.B.I. and C.I.A. agents, whose singular task was to obtain compromising evidence against high-profile putative defendants. Rothstein's story was that the evidence and surveillance acquired, often supporting civil causes of action ranging from sexual harassment to mass tort cover-ups to whistle-blower claims, was presented to the putative defendant who was then offered an opportunity to avoid litigation and the negative publicity associated therewith by agreeing to resolve the litter voluntarily by and through a confidential settlement with the putative plaintiff. + +29. Once the putative defendant agreed, the confidential settlement always included two main ingredients: (1) that structured payments to, a putative plaintiff be made over time, generally a three to nine month time period; and (2) that the putative defendant would fund the entire settlement up front to be held in RRA's TD Bank trust account and disbursed to the putative plaintiff in accordance with the tams of the confidential settlement agreement. + +# The Pitch + +30. Rothstein informed investors that the putative plaintiffs did not want to wait for the structured monthly payouts and would agree to assign their rights to the structured payout for a lump-sum Tent typically in the range of 20-40% of the settlements' face-value. + +othstcin always had a plethora of plausible explanations as to why a putative plaintiff wanted their money now and simply could not wait for the structured monthly payments. + +32. Rothstein claimed to want nothing from the deal and was only presenting the "opportunity" for the putative plaintiff's benefit and to facilitate recovery of RRA's contingent fee. + +33. Notwithstanding, Rothstein would often boast that if not for his professional and legal conflicts he would be the one purchasing these assignments. + +34. As a means to induce investor action, Rothstein would show investors the purported settlement avec,' ent in an attempt to substantiate the deal; however, because the settlements were pre-suit and confidential, the names of the putative plaintiffs and putative defendants were redacted. + +35. Additionally, the Principal Conspirators would provide: 9) confirmation of RRA's trust account balance at TD Bank evidencing the putative defendants fully funded settlement proceeds; (2) a "lock letter", drafted and executed by a ID Bank executive, irrevocably confirming that the respective settlement proceeds in RRA's trust account could only be paid directly to the investor's designated account which, in most cases, was an account at TD Bank; and (3) opportunities for an independent-third-party verifier to authenticate the underlying settlement, assignment and funding of settleinent proceeds. + +36. Notably, Rothstein12/ as hyper-vigilant regarding access to RRA accounts under the guise of confidentiali IiT fact, potential investors could only access TD Bank account information in one of two ways. Either Rothstein would invite the investor to his office to view the online balance or, he would "authorize" TD Bank to provide copies of account statements and wire transfers prepared and delivered by TD Bank executives Spinosa, Kerstetter and Caretsky. On numerous occasions, TD Bank vice-president Spinosa, assistant manager Kerstetter, and assistant vice president Caretsky, physically handed the trust account statement to Rothstein in the immediate presence of an investor. + +37. As the final piece to persuade an investment, Rothstein would offer to personally guaranty the transaction. This personal guaranty, secured by the significant assets (as discussed, supra), was an essential component which tacitly lent credibility and security to the underlying transaction. + +38. Once an investor was interested, the Principal Conspirators, in conjunction with Roden, drafted an agreement for the assignment of the settlement agreement and proceeds. + +39. Upon execution of the assignment, the investor would wire transfer to RItA's trust account the lump sum payment for immediate disbursement to the putative plaintiff. Thereafter, RRA was obligated to make payment from the fimds previously verified and held in RRA's trust account at TD Bank directly to the investor's lock letter trust account at TD Bank in strict accordance with the terms of the purported settlement agreement. + +# Ponzi Scheme In Action + +# Fabricated Settlements.Premised on Real Cases + +40. In certain instances, the purported settlements, albeit fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by RRA. For example, one of the settlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous billionaire financier. In fact, RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil case styled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey &cptein, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered "the opportunity" to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set of operative facts as the Jane Doe case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff. See e-mail dated October 6, 2009 referencing Epstein which is attached hereto and incorporate herein as Exhibit "B." To augment + +his concocted story Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case files in Jane Doe in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard 3pstein's private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figu . Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered 8200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein did not yet know about. Further, Preve was present for this meeting, despite the fact that he was not involved as an investor or representative in the D3 deal. + +41. Additionally, Rothstein Used MIA's representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation, but potentially beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. For instance, RRA relentlessly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age women were on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein's lies. + +42. Conspicuously Preve, who maintained an office at RRA despite being a Banyon Income Fund, LP employee, attended the aforementioned meeting despite his lack of involvement as an investor or representative. + +43. Mother actual case which Rothstein attempted to use as a false predicate for his scheme was a mass tort case against Chiquita Brands International. In this instance, Rothstein claimed to be representing plaintiffs in 450 wrongful death cases on the verge of settling for S2,000,000.00 each. Rothstein told investors to begin raising funds in order to purchase this settlement. See e-mail dated October 14, 2009 referencing Chiquita which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." While the cases against Chiquita are tin did not represent any of the plaintiffs and the cases remain pending. + +# Plaintiffs' Investments: + +# I. Banyan Income Fund + +\HCC)C) + +44. Banyon Income Fund, LP (he 'no 411si BIF"), was formed in May 2009, and served as an original feeder fund for the < P ' z it., nspirators structured settlement deals. + +45. According to offerin a ' BIF's stated investment goal was to purchase: + +discount settlements and related periodic revenue stream from individual plaintiffs who have settled their labor and employment related lawsuits or claims, and who would otherwise receive their settlement amounts over a period of time. The purchased settlements are secured by the full settlement amounts which will have been deposited in a trust account established by the plaintiffs attorney for the benefit of the plaintiff prior to purchase by Banyon Income Fund, LP. These settlements are released to Banyon Income Fund, LP over time to liquidate the purchased settlement. + +See Confidential Offering Memorandum dated April 30, 2009, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "D." + +46. Not coincidentally, BIF's investment strategy is identical to the purported investment vehicle offered by the Principal Conspirators at the center of the Ponzi scheme. + +47. All or substantially all of BIF's assets were funneled into the Principal Conspirators scheme. + +48. In the spring of 2009, Barry Bekkedam from Ballamor Capital Management, LLC (hereinafter, "Ballamor")3 and promoter of BIF, met Doug Von Allmen (D&L Partners) to discuss D&L Partners participation in BIF. + +49. During that discussion, Mr. Von Allmen learned that BIF was stetted by Levin, a professed mentor and confidant of Rothstein, and that the settlements BIF was purchasing were through an exclusive arrangement negotiated between Rothstein and Levin on behalf of BIF. + +50. Mr. Von Allmon was told by Mr. Bekkedam that Mr. Levin was personally worth in excess of \$400,000,000.00 and would personally guarantee the settlements. + +51. Additionally, Mr. Bekkedam told Mr. Von Allmen that the settlements were already fully-funded in the attorneys' trust accounts, that a "Big Four" auditing (inn would verify them quarterly, and that Ballathor had continuous unfettered access to the trust account balances and would be responsible for monitoring same. + +52. Finally, Mr. Von Allmen was told by Mr. Bekkedam that it would take two signatures to move the money, one of which would be someone from BIF. + +53. Mr. Von Allmen (through D&L Partners) brought his wife Linda Von Allmen (through Dynasty Trust) into the investment while, approximately one month later, his step-son, Kretsclunar (collectively referred to herein as "Banyon Investors") was brought into the investment deal by Barry Bekkedam. + +3 Ballamor Capital Management, LLC is an S.E.C. registered investment advisor specializing in managing investments on behalf of high and ultra-high net worth individuals + +54. Prior to investing, each Banyon Investor Deceived a "Confidential Offering Memorandum" dated April 30, 2009 which described the terms and conditions of the purported deals in greater detail. See Composite Exhibit "1)." + +55. Significantly, the Confidential Offering Memorandum provided that the receipt of the wire transfer from the putative defendant into RRA's trust account would be verified by an independent third party. Id. + +56. Furthermore, the Banyon Investors were assured that a representative of the limited partners of BIF would have online access to banking records for d sit account and all system records related to the purchased settlements and could verify purchase settlement trust accounts and deposits by putative defendants. Id. + +(cis\_ 57. Michael Szafranski, presider) f etyx Capital Management, acted as an independent verifier for the Banyon InvecatLan d BIF. Prior to and during the course of his investigation, Mr. Szafranski obtained the following information which demonstrated TD Bank's involvement: + +\ + +a. October 29, 2008 letter signed by Caretsky, assistant branch manager with Commerce Bank enclosing three trust account statements for RRA: (1) account number containing \$166,922,339.00; (2) account number containing \$40,125,685.44; and (3) account number containing \$348,229,463.21. All three trust account statements for RRA are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "E." + +b. March 20, 2009 letter signed by Kerstetter an assistant manager for TD Bank + +Commerce Bank was a predecessor in interest to TD Bank as a result of TD Bank's \$7 billion purchase of Commerce Bank in March 2008. + +enclosing three trust account statement for RRA: (I) account number showing a balance of \$104,211,711.22; (2) account number showing a balance of \$368,333,133.20; and (3) account number showing a balance of \$110,331,563.13. All three account statements referenced are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "F." + +c. April 17, 2009 letter signed by Caretsky as a TD Bank Assistant Vice showing a balance of \$61,117,111; (2) RRA trust account statement for a• ber showing President, enclosing RRA trust account statement for: (1) account number a balance of \$80,978,935.31; (3) RRA trust account account number showing a balance of \$136,122,322.87; (4) RRA, unt statement for account number showing a balance of \$198,644,311.13; and (5) RRA trust account statement for account number showing a balance of \$483,668,999.39. All five trust account statements referenced are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "G." + +d. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending x-I= in the amount of \$1,951,500.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "H"; + +e. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending sin the amount of \$2,680,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement , a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "I"; + +f. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$695,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "J"; + +June 30, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending x- = in the amount of \$2,208,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement , a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "K"; + +h. July 1, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$6,072,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement , a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "L"; + +i. July 13, 2009 letter signed by Kerstetter from closing RRA trust account statement for account number which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composi'txbibit "M"; and showing a b \$14,286,000.00, a copy of + +j. July 17, 2009 TO Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending x= in the amount of \$22,348,221.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "N"; + +58. In reliance on the &mewing, the Banyon Investors collectively invested \$60,000,000.00 into BIF and into the Ponzi scheme. + +# 2. Razorback Fatting, LLC + +59. was formed September 24, 2009 for purposes of investing in two RRA settlem a \$40,600,000.00 structured settlement, payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$23,200,000.00; and (2) a \$26,100,000.00 structured settlement, payable in three equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$17,400,000.00. See Confidential Settlement Agreements and Releases which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "O." + +60. In particular, the deal was structured so Razorback would fund \$32,000,000.00 towards the purchase of these settlements by means of a loan to Banyon USVI, LLC. Banyon USVI in turn would contribute \$8,600,000.00 to purchase the settlement proceeds from the Principal Conspirators. See Acknowledgement of Assignment/Purchase of Settlement;Proceeds and Sale and Transfer Agreements which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "P." + +61. On or about September 18, 2009, as part of its due diligence, Razorback obtained a copy of a TD Bank "lock letter" signed by Spinosa used in a prior deal. See September 18, 2009 lock letter from TD Bank which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "Q." The lock letter indicates that ID Bank had been irrevocably instructed to pay the fund identified in a particular RRA trust account only to the investor's bank account. + +62. On October I, 2009, Mike Szafranski, who was utilized as the independent reviewer for Razorback, met with Rothstein to review and verify all of the documents supporting the Razorback deal. In that meeting, Mr. Szafranski witnessed Rothstein sign on to the TD Bank online banking website and verified that all of the wire transfers for the underlying Razorback settlement deals had been received by RRA and were held in RRA's trust account ending in x-M. A copy of the October 1, 2009 email from Mike Szafranski verifying the above-referenced account is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "R." + +63. Mr. Szafranski also verified that a "lock letter" had been received by Spinosa as Regional Vice President of TD Bank dated October 1, 2009 stating the following: + +> Pursuant to your written instructions to us of September 30, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed + +to Banyon USVI (Del), LLV, do Razorback Funding, LLC, Debt & Equity Re-Payment Account: TD Bank, NA, 319 Glen Head Road, Old Brookville, NY, ABA: Account 14 . Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the Banyon USVI account. + +See October I, 2009 letter which is attached hereto and incorporated herein SS." + +64. Spinosa e-mailed the "lock letter" to Rothstein earlier that "lay with a message stating that at Rothstein's "request and instructions, this accowd [RRA's trust account] has been irrevocably locked as to destination of all disbursements [which was Razorback's account, also at TD Bank]. The letter confirming same is attached. Please do not deposit any funds into this account that arc not solcy (sic) to be directed to the entity set forth in the irrevocable instruction." A copy of the October 1, 2009 email from Spinosa is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "T." / + +65. Also on October 1, 2009, Razorback received copies of two wire transfers from Preve, a Banyon USVI representative, demonstrating that a total of \$66,700,000.00 (the full settlement fimding being purchased) had been received by RRA in its trust account with TD Bank. A copy of the October 1, 2009 wire transfers is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "U." + +66. On the same day, Preve forwarded Razorback an email from Rothstein providing: (1) confirmation of Preve's purported \$8,000,000.00 wire into RRA's trust account; and (2) that no disbursement on the deal would be made until he received the \$32,000,000.00 from + +Razorback. A copy of the October 1, 2009 email from Rothstein is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "V." + +67. On October 3, 2009, Razorback attempted to contact Spinosa to verify the details of the lock letter. The Razorback representative was unable to reach Spinosa but did receive confirmation from Spinosa's assistant that she prepared the lock letter and that Spinosa signed it. + +68. On October 7, 2009, Razorback received an email from Preve which contained an on-line screen shot of an RRA trust account at TD Bank indicating a balance of S66,700,000.00. A copy of the on-line screen shot of the TD Bank account is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "W." + +69. Finally, on October 22, 2009, Mr. Szafranski met again with Rothstein and verified that all of the putative plaintiffs in the Razorback deals received their disbursements by reviewing TD Bank's on-line banking website. Ayopy of Mr. Szafranski October 22, 2009 confirming email is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "X." + +70. RRA's trust account. In reliance on the oing, Razorback transferred the sum of \$32,000,000.00 to + +# 3. 133 Capital ehiLC + +was formed October 4, 2009 for purposes of investing in a \$30,000,000.00 RRA structured settlement, payable in six equal monthly installments of \$5,000,000.00, offered in exchange for S18,000,000.00. See Confidential Settlement Agreements and Releases which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "Y." + +72. A D3 representative, who was also a representative of Razorback's management team, had knowledge of and relied upon the contacts and representations made by TD Bank in connection with the Razorback transaction. + +73. On or about October 15, 2009, as part of its due diligence, D3 obtained a copy of a TD Bank "lock letter" signed by Spinosa stating the following: + +> Pursuant to your written instructions to us of October 14, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed to D3 Capital Club, LLC, 2833 NE 35th Court, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33308, TD Bank NA, Account # + +> Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the TD bank account belonging to D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +See October 15, 2009 lock letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "Z." + +74. On October 15, 2009, Spinosa signed another letter enclosing a copy of RRA's trust account bank statement showing a balance in excess of \$30,000,000.00. See October 15, 2009 letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "AA." + +75. Furthermore, on October 15, 2009, Kerstetter drafted a letter to RRA enclosing a copy of RRA's trust account bank statement for the D3 settlement showing a balance in excess of \$30,000,000.00. This letter was personally delivered by Kerstetter to Rothstein in a D3 representative's presence while inside the TD Bank Fort Lauderdale branch. See October 15, 2009 letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "AA-1." Later that day, Kerstetter met again with that same D3 representative at a location outside of the bank in order to sign the paperwork to open a D3 account at TD Bank. + +76. On October 16, 2009 and again on October 19, 2009, a D3 representative sent emails to Spinosa and Kerstetter advising that D3 had opened its account for purposes of doing business with RRA and asked about the mechanics of the irrevocable lock letter that D3 had with RRA account number A copy of the October 16, 2009 and October 19, 2009 avails are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "BB." + +77. Spinosa responded to the October 19, 2009 email with a phone call to the D3 representative. During the conversation, the lock letter was acknowledged by Spinosa who declined to provide any further details about the Principal Conspirators' accounts. + +78. Finally, on October 19, 2009, Mr. Szafransld met with Rothstein and verified that the sum of \$30,000,000.00 was wired from the putative defendant into the RRA trust account ending x-M. A copy of the October 19, 2009 email is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "CC." + +79. In reliance on the foregoing, D3 transferred the sum of \$13,500,000.00 to RRA's trust account. + +# 4. BFMC Investment, LLe + +80. BFMC was formed in November 1998 to fund investment opportunities. + +81. On September 28 2009, BFMC principal, Barry Florescue ("Florescue") met socially with Andrew Barnett ("Barnett"), Director of Corporate Development for RRA. + +82. During this meeting, Barnett described his role at RRA and invited Florescue to meet Rothstein later that week to discuss a lucrative investment opportunity. Florescue was aware of Rothstein given Rothstcin's prominence in the Fort Lauderdale business and social community, and a meeting was scheduled at RRA on September 30, 2009. + +83. Florescue and his employee, Mark Seigel ("Seigel"), arrived in RRA's offices and were initially introduced to Boden. Coincidentally, Boden had, many years earlier, worked as a junior staff member at Florescue's corporate counsel and had actively worked on one of Florescue's previous financing transactions. + +84. After several minutes, Boden and Barnett led Florescue and. Seigel into Rothstein's private office. + +85. After introductions, Rothstein described an investor t o rtunity involving pt;) purchasing various structured settlements explaining as follow + +a. RRA is a nationally recogniz meriting whistleblowers in whistleblower lawsuits against employers. RRA has spedific expertise in a specific type of litigation called Qui Tam litigation, in which the defendant is also accused of defrauding the United States government. RRA became a magnet for Qui Tam cases following its success as co-counsel in a 2008 Eli Lilly Qui Tam case, which resulted in a \$1 billion plus settlement. + +b. RRA was currently representing whistleblower plaintiffs inside a Fortune 500 company that had allegedly defrauded the United States government. Citing confidentiality, Rothstein could not share the name of the defendant, but he described it as a large food conglomerate that had substituted cheaper ingredients into food supplies sold to the government under national contracts. Rothstein was rounding up dozens of whistleblowers inside the company who had been threatened by senior management to remain silent regarding the company's fraud. + +c. RRA had negotiated numerous settlements for \$1,400,000.00 for various whistleblower clients, but defendant insisted on paying the settlements out over four months. The plaintiffs wanted their cash up front. + +d. Rothstein explained that the putative plaintiffs were willing to take a large discount up front because: (i) they had a high degree of concern over whether defendant would attempt to prevent them from receiving payments after settling and, (ii) Rothstein explained in detail a legal concept called "privity" — plaintiff was "in privity" with the defendant which subjected their settlement to reversal by the federal government. Rothstein represented that a z third party buyer of the settlement rights would not be subject to:such reversal as the third party was not "in privity" with the defendant. + +e. The settlement documents were drafted and ready to be settled, but Rothstein needed to find an investor to fund the settlement. Rothstein explained that such a transaction was legal, because the settlement agreement had no "anti-assignment rights", but that any third party investor couldn't be given any details about the parties involved in the settlement, because it was by nature highly confidential and did contain strong confidentiality provisions. + +f. Due to the fact that a "fonder" could not be given any information about the case, the defendant, or the plaintiff, and given the fact that Rothstein needed a high degree of confidentiality about even the existence of the funding arrangement (in order to prevent defendants from explicitly prohibiting this type of arrangement going forward), Rothstein could only engage in such transaction with local friends with whom he trusted. + +g. RRA's clients were willing to accept \$800,000.00 up front in exchange for their rights to the \$1,400,000.00 settlement, payable over 4 months. + +h. Rothstein could not personally fund the structured settlements because it was illegal for him or his firm to profit from a structured settlement in which he represented the plaintiff. However, it was in his firm's interest to find a fundcr so that the firm could settle the case and get paid its contingency fee. + +i. Rothstein remarked that the transaction would be substantiated and verified, that he would provide evidence of the settlement in his office, and that he would get on the phone with Spinosa of I'D Bank to confirm that the putative defendant's funds had been V wired into a Florida Bar trust account with instructions to oil e the funds in that account to the specified finder. + +S CIC ) 86. Upon concluding the meeting, BamettAval ed Florescue and Seigel out to the elevator. During a debrief, Barnett revealed that the defendant was Dole Foods, which had knowingly supplied the U.S. Government with impure orange juice in a major juice contract that called for 100% pure orange jui . Barnett said that Rothstein had offered to sign a corporate and personal guaranty as a fiirth cement to make the investment. + +87. Betty,n Seht'eriT6er 30, 2009 and October 15, 2009, BFMC worked with their counsel and Bodaarious transaction documents necessary to close the deal. + +88. litpring the first week of October 2009, Florescue telephoned Spinosa, who Florescue knew 4 professionally based on various banking activities previously engaged in, to inquire about Rothstein. Spinosa said that he could not talk about Rothstein without Rothstein's consent. + +89. In early October, 2009, Boden finalized the dcal documents for BFMC's investment in three identical RRA settlements: (1) a \$1,400,000.00 structured settlement, + +payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$800,000.00; (2) a second \$1,400,000.00 structured settlement, payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$800,000.00; and (3) a third \$1,400,000.00 structured settlement, payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$800,000.00. See correspondence from David Boden which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "DD." + +90. BFMC's explicit understanding from Boden and Rothstein was that the putative defendant's funds were to be held in RRA's trust account and could only be released directly to BFMC's account pursuant to an irrevocable "lock letter." + +91. On or about October 15, 2009, as part of its due diligence, BFMC obtained a copy of a TD Bank "lock letter" signed by Spinosa stating that: + +> [p]ursuant to your written instructions to us of October 14, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed to BB&T (FICA: Colonial Bank), Pompano Beach Branch # 32083, (954) 943-6550, ABA# for further credit to: BFMC Investment, LLC Account # + +> Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the BB&T (FICA: Colonial Bank) account # belonging to BFMC Investment, LW. + +See October 15, 2009 lock letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "EE." + +92. Later that day, and in reliance on the foregoing, BFMC wired \$2,400,000.00 to RRA's TD Bank account number + +#### Implosion of Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme + +93. In October 2009, the Ponzi scheme reached critical mass. October was a huge month for investor settlement redemptions and Rothstein knew that the influx of new investor capital could not satisfy all previous investor obligations. Sensing that the end was near, Rothstein began planning his escape. + +94. On October 17, 2009, Rothstein sent a firm-wide e-mail at RRA asking for help to determine whether a "client" who is facing a multitude of criminal charges in the United States- including fraud, money laundering and embezzlement--could be extradited to the United States or Israel from abroad after renouncing his United States citizenship. Rothstein's email asked for countries which did not have extradition treaties with the United States or Israel5 and concluded by stating that "[t]his client is related to a very powerful client of ours and so time is of the essence. Lets rock and roll... there is\_a very-large fee attached to this case. Thanks Love ya Scott." See Sun-Sentinel article dated5 Not coincidentally Morocco, Rothstein's destination on October 27, 2009, was one of the countries that does not have an extradition treaty with either the United States or Israel + +payments due to him the week prior. Rothstein attempted to diffuse the situation leaving Spinosa visibly shaken. + +97. Shortly thereafter, Rothstein proceeded to methodically drain the TD Bank RRA accounts dry, depleting virtually all of the remaining investors' money as well as the money of many of the firms' clients. + +98. On October 27, 2009, Rothstein secretly boarded a private G-5 jet destined for Morocco, but not before completing a S16,000,000.00 wire transfer to it Moroccan bank. + +99. By October 30, 2009, investors began to scramble desperately attempting to reach Rothstein for answers. Unbeknownst to them Rothstein was already gone, along with their investments, as the Ponzi scheme finally buckled under the pressure of obligations due. + +# Pevastatine Fallout + +./ 100. The velocity at whtchz the Ponzi scheme cratered sent a sonic boom felt throughout the financial and legal world. + +101. Reeling from its shameful missteps in connection with the Rothstein scandal, an emergency receiver was appointed for RRA on November 4, 2009 for the purpose of winding down its operations. + +102.--- As the dust begins to settle, critical details have emerged revealing the scope and magnitude of this the nefarious scheme. By way of example Plaintiffs have discovered that: + +- a. the entirety of Plaintiffs' more than \$100,000,000.00 investment was gone; +- b. plaintiffs' "lock letter" accounts were never funded with the purported settlement money and contained only a nominal deposit of \$100.00; + +- c. even after Rothstein's October 27, 2009 departure to Morocco, millions of dollars continued to flow out of RRA accounts from the Fort Lauderdale TD Bank accounts, indicative of an insider(s) maintaining operations of the Ponzi scheme; +- d. in October 2009 alone \$235,000,000.00 in credits and \$2 32,900,000.00 in debits was transacted through the RRA accounts at T +- e. the \$8,000,000.00 wire transfer confirmation u by reve and Rothstein to induce Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 was in fact never received by RRA or TD Bank; +- f. on July 27, 2009 Rothstein transferred a \$407,750.00 assessed value +- g. +- h. property to for "love and affection" and \$100.00. Notwithstanding owning the property free and clear, who earned \$250,000.00 a year decided to pull \$100,000.00 out of the property days prior to the IRS filing of a forfeiture in rem complaint against the property; on November 1, 2009, Mel Lipschitz of DE Securities whose group invested nearly S100,000,000.00 into the Ponzi scheme, advised a group of investor victims that he personally sat with Spinosa at TD Bank and verified investment account balances; sometime in the Spring or Summer of 2009, Ted Morse was personally provided with a written account balance statement by Caretsky at TD Bank; and + +- i. TD Bank either knew or certainly should have known of the criminality and/or gross irregularities of RRA's operations. Alternatively, TD Bank's actions and/or omissions in not conducting any due diligence inquiry into RRA's suspicious activities, unorthodox settlement structuresii, lack of supporting document and vigilant (if not obsessive) contr 'pc 1 ver account access was either deliberate or reckless. + +103. A Ponzi scheme cannot be operated without insider he aintiffs believe that additional members of RRA, including its non-lawyer inves ere used by Rothstein to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi scheme. T' • of these individuals or entities involvement and participation is presently unlatkvn er allegations and counts will be added as discovery is conducted and information concerning the complicity of these individuals or entities is confirmed. + +# Jurisdiction and Venue + +104. This court la jurisdiction over this matter as an action for damages in excess of \$100,000,000.00 exclusive of attorneys' fees, costs and interest. + +105. Venue is appropriate Broward County, Florida, pursuant to § 47.011, Fla. Stat., because the Defendants' reside in Broward County, Florida and the cause of action accrued in Broward County, Florida. + +106. All conditions precedent, if any, have been met, waived or excused. + +107. Plaintiffs have retained the undersigned firm and have agreed to pay it a reasonable fee. + +#### COUNT I - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein) + +108. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +109. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. p 110. As described more fully above, Rothstcin was operating a P mc through c) + +111. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein karsvin made material false statements and representations, including but not limited to representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +112. Rothstein intended the Banyon Investors to act on his knowingly false representations. + +113. The Banyon Inve,stors justifiably relied upon Rothstein's representations to their detriment. + +114. As a direct and proximate result of Rothstein's false statements, The Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT II - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +115. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +116. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +117. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a P : \heme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +118. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Kerstetter - made material false statements and representations including, but not limited tg investors with false bank account statements. + +representations. 119. Kerstetter intended the Bany S Asi , ,\ tSrs to act on her knowingly false + +120. The Banyon Investorsi:Stifi b1y relied upon Kerstetter's representations to their detriment. + +121. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, THE LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT III - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +122. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +123. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +124. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +125. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Caretsky knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited ypplying investors with false bank account statements. + +126. Caretsky intended the Banyon Investors to act on her knowingly false representations. + +127. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to their detriment. + +128. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, THE LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT IV -FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +129. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +130. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +131. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the seo ployment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +132. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was actin • of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Banc. 01, + +133. As described more fully above, Roth perating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +em 134. In furtherance of the Po ic' te TD Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, knowingly made material false statements d representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +135. TD Bank, through. Kerstetter and Carctsky, intended the Runyon Investors to act on their knowingly false representations. + +136. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon TD Bank's through Kerstetter's and Caretsky's representations to their detriment. + +137. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's, made through Kerstetter's and Caretsky's, false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD + +BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT V - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +138. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +139. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. O \ + +) . - . 140. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzt scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +141. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, ade material false statements and representations including, but not limited to g investors with false bank account statements. + +142. When making the false is and representations, Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +143. Kerstetter owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know th4 tbsBanyon i Investors were placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform + +tetter breached her duty to the Banyon investors by making false representations with the intention that the Banyon Investors rely on them. + +145. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to their detriment. + +146. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT VI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +147. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. c + +148. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentati ( ciera + +149. As described more fully above, Roths his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. ting a Ponzi scheme through + +150. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Caretsky made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts. + +151. When making, the false statements and representations, Caretsky either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +152. Caretsky owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform them. + +153. Caretsky breached her duty to the Banyon investors by making false representations with the intention that the Banyon Investors rely on them. + +154. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +restated herein. 155. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if 14/ ) + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT VII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +156. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation^'' + +iNt ) 157. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter k St ng in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +158. At all times material hereto was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and b cr of TD Bank. + +159. As described more fully a ovc, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +160. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, To Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts. + +161. When making the false statements and representations, TD Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +162. TD Bank owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +163. TD Bank breached its duty to the Banyon Investors by making false representations, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, with the intention that the Baryon Investors rely on them. + +164. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, through Kerstetter's and Caretsky's, representations to their detriment. + +165. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's representations, made through Kerstetter and Caretsky, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT VIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +166. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +167. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +168. Kerstetter was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Kerstetter was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +169. Kerstetter was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +170. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary + +171. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and d e Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT IX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +172. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +173. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +174. Caretsky 'was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Caretsky was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +175. Caretsky was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +176. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothst in in his Aft& financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary dutyAS h + +177. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and d: e Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of geNN ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +178. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +179. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +180. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +181. At all times material hereto, Carctsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +182. TD Bank was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. TD Bank was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +183. TD Bank was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +184. TD Bank, through its employees acting within the their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Ro 's financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +185. TD Bank's actions have directly caused ury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and DEAN KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT XI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Debra M) + +186. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +187. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +188. was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +189. was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the invest\* to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +190. actively assisted, and provided substantial ass to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breach iary duty. + +191. actions have directly ca d damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and request judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT XII — BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +192. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +193. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +194. As trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds + +to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +195. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the RRA trust accounts for his personal use. + +196. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XIII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +197. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +198. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +199. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +200. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +201. In Florida, a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with its customer under special circumstances where the bank knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to so counsel and inform him. Under the circumstances outlined above, where TD Bank knew that the Banyon Investors were relying on + +Kerstetter's and Caretsky's representations that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds, TD Bank was a fiduciary of the Banyon Investors and owed them the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +202. TD Bank breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors. + +203. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as T ON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and ■ **KR'SCH AR request judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper.** + +#### **COUNT XIV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Jennifer Kerstetter)** + +**204. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein.** + +**205. ( Sa aim for aiding and abetting fraud.** + +**described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank.** + +**207. Kerstetter knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme.** + +**208. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of The Banyon Investors through fraud. Kerstetter's assistance** included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to the Banyon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +209. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALL 31NASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request jtifgt ent against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together wi court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +210. Plaintiff's incorporate the allegatipji oTh fined in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +211. This is a claim for aid' g getting fraud. + +212. As described more tully ove, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +213. Caretsky knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +214. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of The Banyon Investors through fraud. Caretsky's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to the Banyon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +215. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +216. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in pare through 107 as if restated herein. + +217. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +218. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +219. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +220. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +Cy 221. new of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to the Banyon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +223. 'ID Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XVII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Debra M) + +224. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in Para 't1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +225. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +226. As described more fully above, the d itacch the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Po bough his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank + +227. knew of RothsEew'saudulent scheme. + +228. actively Csist and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including the Banyon Investors, through fraud. assistance included, but was not limited to, furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +229. actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA + +for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XVIII - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +230. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I throd p7 as if restated herein. + +231. This is a claim for conversion. O 'S + +232. As described more fully above, the deals in whic B it Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme throft h rm, RRA, and through TD ) Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investo sw ict be absconded with the Banyon Investors \$60,000,000.00 in funds. ( , + +233. Rothstein's conversio 4 .1an yon Investors funds has permanently deprived A, the Banyon Investors of their p + +234. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +235. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deans proper. + +#### COUNT XIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +236. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +237. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +238. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,000,000.00 in funds. + +239. Rothstein's conversion of the Bapyt Inyestors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their property. + +240. Based upon Rothstein 1i nfipitially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyan Initestors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +241. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +242. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +243. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 throtigh107 as if restated herein. \ + +244. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +245. As described more fully above, the deals in which le n Investors invested were bogus and Rothstcin was operating a Ponzi scheme thrett rm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Roths • ``exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Invest° e absconded with their 560,000,000.00 in funds. + +246. Rothstein's conversio. anyon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their + +247. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be %tile. + +248. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +249. Carctsky's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +250. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +251. This is a claim for aiding and abetting cony + +252. As described more fully above, the d t the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponz/is n through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors when he absconded with their S60,000,000.00 in funds. + +253. Rothstein's conversion of the Banyon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their property. + +254. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +255. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +256. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +Investors. 258. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and . . I la AS C : . the Banyon + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee o TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETS\ N ALLMEN DYNASTY uest judgment against Ti) BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with con costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +257. TD Bank, through its employees while acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by allowing Rothstein to make unauthorized withdrawals of its funds and by deceiving the Banyon Investors Aimmt into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +# COUNT XXII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Debra M) + +259. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +260. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +261. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors when he absconded with the Banyon Investors' \$60,000,000.00 in funds. + +262. Rothstein's conversion of the Banyon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their property. + +263. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +264. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +265. actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VO EN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXIII - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +266. Plaintiffs ineozporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +267. a claim for negligent supervision. + +described more fully above, Kerstetter and Caretsky participated, with actual or constructive knowledge, in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Kerstetter's and Caretsky's participation included, but was not limited to, providing the Banyon Investors with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts. + +269. In reliance on Kerstetter's and Caretsky's representations, on May 5, 2009, the Banyon Investors began sending payments to RRA's account at TO Bank, eventually funding a total of \$60,000,000.00. + +270. The Banyon Investors' reliance on Kerstetter's and Caretsky's repretentations was reasonable and justified. + +271. TD Bank owed a duty to the Banyon Investors to ensure th oyees were not actively defrauding depositors by making false representations i ord to trick them into making unsafe deposits into trust accounts that they knew or 1 y should have known were being raided by Rothstein. + +272. TD Bank breached its duties to thetaltyo nvestors because it had actual or constructive notice that its assistant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either fraudulently or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted in the unauthorized raiding of investors' deposits, and acted unreasonably by failing to investigate or take corrective action. + +273. As a direct IC?art proximate result of TD Bank's failure to investigate or take corrective action a Kerstetter or Caretsky, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFO E, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXIV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein) + +274. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +275. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +276. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a P Ack? ' eme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. c) + +277. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein made material false statements and representations, including but not limited to representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +278. Rothstein intended Razorback to act on his knowingly false representations. + +279. Razorback justifiably relied upon Rothstein's representations to its detriment. + +280. As a direct and proximate result of Rothstein's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deans proper. + +#### COUNT XXV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Spinosa) + +281. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +282. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +283. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +284. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +285. Spinosa intended Razorback to act on his knowingly false representations. + +286. Razorback justifiably relied upon Spinosa's repreientations to its detriment. + +287. As a direct and proximate result of Spinosa's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXVI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +288. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein + +2851.. 1is is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +290. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +291. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Kerstetter knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +292. Kerstetter intended Razorback to act on her knowingly false representations. + +293. Razorback justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to its detriment. + +294. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment a ICERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and er relief as the Court deems proper. JENNIFER + +#### COUNT XXVII - FRAUDULENT MISREP TATION (against Roseanne Caretsifyl + +295. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +296. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +297. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RItA, and through TD Bank. + +298. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Caretsky knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account sta + +2 aretsky intended Razorback to act on her knowingly false representations. + +300. Razorback justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to its detriment. + +301. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXVIII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +302. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 107 as if restated herein. + +303. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +304. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was a Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. pc of his employment as + +305. At all times material hereto, K as an assistant manager of TD Bank. i s acting in the scope of her employment + +306. At all times material hcejo, tsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +307. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +308. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +309. TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, intended Razorback to act on their knowingly false representations. + +310. Razorback justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, through Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's, representations to its detriment. + +311. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's, made through Spinosa's Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's, false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. 46.4 + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment a N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such fu deems proper. TD BANK, as the Court + +#### COUNT XXIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Preve) + +312. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +313. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +314. As described more fu) above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through 'A() his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +315. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Preve knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and false confirmations that othcr monies had been wired to RRA trust accounts. + +316. Prevc intended Razorback to act on his knowingly false representations. + +317. Razorback justifiably relied upon Preve's representations to its detriment. + +318. As a direct and proximate result of Preve's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXX - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Spinosa) + +319. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. + +320. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +321. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +322. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue6ritten assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +\\/ Ir 323. When making the false, statements and representations, Spinosa either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +324. Spinosa owed Razorback a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform it. + +325. Spinosa breached his duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +326. Razorback justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +327. As a direct and proximate result of Spinosa's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXXI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +328. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 0ASh 107 as if restated herein. + +329. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +330. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +331. In furtherance of the Ponzi sch er made material false statements and representations including, but not limitydto, plying investors with false bank account statements. + +332. When making th else temcnts and representations, Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +333. Kerstetter owed Razorback a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform it. + +334. Kerstetter breached her duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +335. Razorback justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to its detriment. + +336. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT XXXII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +337. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrap 107 as if restated herein. + +338. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. — + +339. As described more fully above, Rothstein was-operating a Ponzi scheme through / his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +340. In furtherance of the Ponzi sch \ ky made material false statements and representations including, but not limit to, pplying investors with false bank account statements. + +Cs 341. When making th false tements and representations, Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +342. Catr,tsky owed Razorback a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that Razorbac lacing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform it. + +i Caretsky breached her duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +344. Razorback justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to its detriment. + +345. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXXIII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +346. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs~3 jli igh 107 as if restated herein. 347. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. c) + +348. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the, scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +349. At all times material hereto, Kerb i acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +350. At all times material ky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branchTnanager of TD Bank. + +351. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +352. hi furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky,-made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts and providing misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +353. When making the false statements and representations, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +354. TD Bank owed Razorback a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on it to inform them. + +355. TD Bank breached its duty to Razorback by making false representations, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +356. Razorback justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, through Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's, representations to their detriment. + +C, 357. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's rep re€) tat ons, made through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, Razorback has sustained d ges. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LW 4 udgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with co d such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXXIV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Frank Spinosa) + +358. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +359. This is a claitn for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +360. .Spinosa was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Spinosa was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +361. Spinosa was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +restated herein. 364. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in 2 paragraphs 1 through 107 as if + +365. This is a claim for aiding and ab HS %C ACtlich of fiduciary duty. + +366. Kerstetter was aware tha ee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlementfwfidxs lre deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Kerstetter was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +362. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +363. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against FRANK A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXXV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +367. Kerstetter was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +368. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +369. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT YOCXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Roseanne Caretsky) ,-..... ., + +370. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs gh 107 as if "cud, restated herein. + +371. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduci + +372. Caretsky was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Roth- had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Caretsky was also aware that as trustee of the attorney [ trust account containing the funds to whi • Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the 4-.hon .\_\_\_ near future, Rothstein had fiduciary o esty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +373. Caretsky was aw that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +374. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +375. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 3OOCVII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +376. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +377. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Aulk, + +378. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope oSI' ployment , as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +379. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting it the e of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +380. At all times material hereto, Caretsky in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manag ank. + +6 381. TD Bank was aware th as stee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement e deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Ra'rtack. Bank was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +382. , TD Bank was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +383. TD Bank, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +384. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT VOCVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Debra ME) + +385. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs gh 107 as if restated herein. + +386. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduci + +387. was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothsteip had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +388. was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +389. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +390. actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Preve) + +391. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +392. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +393. Preve was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account ( :1 15Ae ctt ) Razorback's " purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duets f nasty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Preve was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to coiled in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +394. Preve was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +395. Preve actively assisted, and -provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorb at and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +396. Preve's acti ve directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XL — BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +397. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +398. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +399. As trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties oc honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +400. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the unts for his personal use. + +401. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury add dil4dQages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LW, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the 1 \ \ Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLI - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +402. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +403. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +404. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +405. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +406. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +407. In Florida, a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with its customer under special circumstances where the bank knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to so counsel and inform him. Under the circumstances outlined above, whereby TD Bank knew that Razorback was relying on Spinosa's assurances to Razorback of the precautions in place to prevent improper withdrawals from its account, I'D Bank was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. Additionally, where TD Bank knew that Razorback investors were relying on Spinosa's, Kerstetter's and Caretsky's representations that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds, TD Bank was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the z fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +408. TD Bank breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of Razorback. + +409. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Preve) + +410. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +411. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +412. By holding himself out as a co-investor, Preve became a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +413. Preve breached his fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and 4 providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback. + +414. Preve's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razoth + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests jud ent st PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and suc urther relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLIII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Spinosa) + +415. Plaintiff incorporates the allegati llyined in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +.416. This is a claim for ai rt' ing fraud. + +/ 114/ 417. As described more fully ve, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank + +418. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +419. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included, but was not limited to, supplying Razorback with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +420. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLIV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +421. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. 107 as if + +422. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +423. As described more fully above, the deals in rback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his Thu, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +424. Kerstetter knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +425. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Kerstetter's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to Razorback that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +426. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as thc Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +427. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +428. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +429. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +430. Caretsky knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +431. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Caretsky's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to Razorback that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +432. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +433. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +434. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +435. As-described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank + +436. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment for TD Bank. + +437. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +438. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +439. T13 Bank knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +440. TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing entation to Razorback that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial fund they did not and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written ass ncerning the settlement accounts. + +441. T13 Bank's actions have directly ca \* ut and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUND G, , requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with, court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT XLVU - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Debra M) + +442. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herei + +si is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +444. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +445. knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +446. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including + +Razorback, through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +447. actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment asst DEBRA for compensatory damages, togc Court deems proper. th court costs and such lief as the + +#### COUNT XLVIII - AIDI D ABE (against Prove)", + +448. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +449. This is a claim for aiding belt\* fraud. + +450. As described more fir the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi sch c through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +451. Prcvc knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +452. Preve actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Preve's assistance included, but was not limited to, confirming wire transfers into Rothstein's trust accounts that he knew were fabricated. + +453. Preve's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLIX - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +454. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +455. This is a claim for conversion. + +456. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +457. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +458. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +459. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT L- AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Spinosa) + +460. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +461. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +462. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +463. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +464. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country alfter egrplying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon rm the return of its property would be futile. + +465. Spinosa actively assisted, and propl su tantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Raazorb3ek of its property by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +466. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensato ages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems pro + +#### UNT LI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +467.' Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +468. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +469. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In + +furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +470. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +471. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after empt 'n out the trust r m e accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the . its property ) would be futile. + +472. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided sub stance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback ' eny by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under falsepreten s. + +473. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damagei, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +474. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +475. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +476. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +477. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +478. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +479. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of its property by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +480. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LIII - AIDING,AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +481. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +482. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +483.. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his finn, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +484. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +485. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +486. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his entloyment A ft & for TD Bank. + +as an assistant manager of TD Bank. 487. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the 1 0Smployment + +488. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acti scope of her employment as an assistant vicc president and branch manager of TD a a.. + +t 489. TD Bank, through its employees while cting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of its property by allowing Rothstein to make unauthorized withdrawals of its funds aixl/by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +490. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LIV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Debra + +491. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +492. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +493. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +494. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +495. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country aUer emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon din the return of its property would be futile. + +496. actively assisted, and proviCed\ta su ntial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of its property by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +497. actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensat Court deems pro ages, together with court costs and such further relief as the + +#### UNT LV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Preve) + +498. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +499. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +500. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his fimi, RRA, and through TD Bank. In + +furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds. + +501. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. 4...t; + +502. Based upon Rothstcin having initially fled the country after emp I out v the trust e accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the . its property C..) would be futile. + +503. Preve actively assisted, and provided substanti ce, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of i y deceiving Razorback into funding settlements that he knew did not exist. + +504. Preve's actions have directly cowed injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LVI - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +505. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +506. This is a claim for negligent supervision. + +507. As described more fully above, Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky participated, with actual or constructive knowledge, in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's participation included, but was not limited to, providing the Razorback with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +508. In reliance on Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's representations, on October 2, 2009, Razorback began sending payments to RRA's account at TD Bank, eventually funding a Ake. total of \$32,000,000.00. + +509. Razorback's reliance on Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, an was reasonable and justified. resentations + +510. TD Bank owed a duty to Razorback to ensure that its anployccs were not actively defrauding depositors by making false representations in order to nick them into making unsafe deposits into trust accounts that they knew or reasonably should have known were being raided by Rothstein. + +511. TD Bank breached its duties to Razorback because it had actual or constructive notice that its assistant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either fraudulently or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted in the unauthorized raiding of investors' deposits and reasonably by failing to investigate or take corrective action. + +512. cA j i i ct and proximate result of 113 Bank's failure to investigate or take corrective acti against Spinosa, Kerstetter, or Caretsky, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. it 515. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a P O • eme through + +Complaint + +#### COUNT LVII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein) + +513. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +514. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +516. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein knowic made material false statements and representations, including but not limited to representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +517. Rothstein intended D3 to act on his knowingly false representations. + +518. D3 justifiably relied upon Rotbstein's representations to its detriment. + +519. As a direct and proximate result of Rothstein's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LW, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTF.IN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LVIII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Spinosa) + +520. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +521. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +522. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +523. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +524. Spinosa intended D3 to act on his knowingly false representations. + +525. D3 justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +526. As a direct and proximate result of Spinosa's false statements, D3 has sustained / damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +527. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated her + +s is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +529. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +530. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Kerstetter knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +531. Kerstetter intended D3 to act on her knowingly false representations. + +532. D3 justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to its detriment. + +533. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and the Court deems proper. er relief as + +#### COUNT LX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESE , 'ATION (against Roseanne Caretsky) , + +534. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations tainV in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +l 535. 'This is a claim for fraudu e' entation. + +536. As described more Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through Ab14/ his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +537. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Caretsky knowingly made material false statements and relesentations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account sta + +5 tsky intended D3 to act on her knowingly false representations. + +539. D3 justifiably relied upon Carctsky's representations to its detriment. + +540. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +541. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs ACtZgh 107 as if restated herein. 542. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. c) + +543. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +544. At all times material hereto, Kers ttestvas , acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +545. At all times material as an assistant vice president and branch Ac4 , sky was acting in the scope of her employment anager of TD Bank. + +546. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +547. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +548. TI) Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky intended D3 to act on their knowingly false representations. + +549. D3 justifiably relied upon TI) Bank's through Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's representations to its detriment. + +550. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's, made through Spinosa's Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against ANtt N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further reli i e urt deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXII - NEGLIGENT MISFtEP TION (against Spinosa) , + +551. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +552. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +553. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +554. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +555. When making the false statements and representations, Spinosa either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +556. Spinosa owed D3 a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that D3 was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform it. + +557. Spinosa breached his duty to D3 by making false representations with the intention that D3 rely on them. + +558. D3 justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +559. As a direct and proximate result of Spinosa's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against FRANK A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXIII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +560. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +561. This is a claim for negligent mi i tio + +562. As described more fully al oi, c stem was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Ban\$ + +563. In furtherance of the Pond scheme, Kerstetter made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +564. When making the false statements and representations, Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +565. Kerstetter owed D3 a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that D3 was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform it. + +566. Kerstetter breached her duty to D3 by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +567. D3 justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to their detriment. + +568. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LW, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as Aherc, the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXIV - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTAT (against Roseanne Carctsky) + +569. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in s I through 107 as if restated herein. + +570. This is a claim for negligent misrepres i.Si ; + +571. As described more fully above \ was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. s tare + +572. In furtherance of the • eine, Caretsky made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +573. When making the false statements and representations, Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +574. Caretsky owed D3 a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that D3 was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform it. + +575. Carctsky breached her duty to D3 by making false representations with the intention that D3 rely on them. + +576. D3 justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to their detriment. + +577. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LXV - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATI (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +578. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +579. This is a claim for negligent misrepreserna ihiit. i + +580. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +581. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +582. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +583. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +584. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts and providing misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts.. + +585. When making the false statements and representations, TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Carctsky either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +586. TD Bank owed D3 a duty of care because it knew or had reason to kno4 that D3 was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on it to infonn them. + +587. TD Bank breached its duty to D3 by making false rep ti ns, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, with the intention that D3 rely on th + +588. D3 justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, thro AO inosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's, representations to its detriment. + +589. As a direct and proximate result of-\* D1 made through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., / for compensatory damages, together with /court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Spinosa) + +590. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +591. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +592. Spinosa was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where D3's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. Spinosa was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing + +the funds to which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near fixture, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. + +593. Spinosa was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstcin was breaching his fiduciary obligations to D3. + +594. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +595. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and dams to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requ ent against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with cqu std and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### " 14/ COUNT I,XVII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +596. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +597. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +598. Kerstetter was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where D3's purported settlement fluids were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to 133. Kerstetter was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. + +599. Kerstetter was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstcin was breaching his fiduciary obligations to D3. + +600. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +601. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER ICERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such farther relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LXVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +602. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +603. This is a claim for aiding and ab nrc)reach of fiduciary duty. + +604. Caretsky was aware that of the attorney trust account where D3's purported settlement funds were d thstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. Caretsky was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. + +605. Caretsky was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was awarc that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to D3. + +606. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +607. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY D (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +608. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs,J4j7igh 107 as if restated herein. + +609. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciKt )y. + +610. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting, in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of TD Bank. + +611. At all times material hereto, K ttswas acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. yy + +612. At all times material tsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch anager of TD Bank. + +613. 1D Bank was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where 133's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. TD Bank was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to\_which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. + +614. TD Bank was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to D3. + +615. TD Bank, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +616. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further reli proper. urt deems + +#### COUNT LXX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Debra Villegas) + +617. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +618. This is a claim for aiding & b ....., breach of fiduciary duty. + +619. was aware that ,as stet of the attorney trust account where I33's / purported settlement funds wens deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which 133 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. + +620. was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to 133. + +621. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +622. actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXI — BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +623. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrap 107 as if restated herein. 624. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. c) + +625. As trustee of the attorney trust account where D3's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to D3. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to 1.)3. + +626. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the RRA trust accounts for his personal use. + +627. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deans proper. + +#### COUNT LXXII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +628. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +629. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +630. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of TD Bank. + +631. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +632. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +633. In Florida, a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with itileomer under special circumstances where the bank knows or has reason to know stomer is placing trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to nse/ and inform him. Under the circumstances outlined above, whereby 11D Ba at D3 was relying on Spinosa's assurances to D3 of the precautions in placeet improper withdrawals from its account, TD Bank was a fiduciary of D3 and owed D3 the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. Additionally, where TD Bank k c that D3 was relying on Kerstetter's representations to D3 that the settlement trust accounts -been funded, TD Bank was a fiduciary of D3 and owed D3 the fiduciary duties of honISZ"royalty, and care. In addition, TD knew that D3 was relying on Caretsky's representations that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds, TD Bank was a fiduciary of D3 and owed D3 the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +634. TD Bank breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of D3. + +635. ID Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXIII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Spinosa) + +636. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. + +637. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +638. As described more fully above, the deals ieW invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his fum, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +639. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +640. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included, but was not limited to, supplying D3 with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +641. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXIV -AIDING AND ABETITING FRAUD (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +642. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +643. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +644. As described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +645. Kerstetter knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +646. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 through fraud. Kerstetter's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to D3 that the RRA accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +647. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused ' age to D3. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, uests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, jro tlter rdh court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +648. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through l07 as if restated herein. + +649. a Maim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +651. Caretsky knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +652. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 through fraud by representing to D3 that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds, all the time knowing that the accounts contained, at most, minimal + +balances and that, to the extent the accounts were funded, that Rothstein routinely raided the accounts for his own use. + +653. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +654. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +655. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +656. As described more fully ab2ve, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +657. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment for TD Bank. + +658. At all'times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +659, At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +660. TD Bank knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +661. TD Bank, through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to the D3 that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +662. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXVII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Debra IME) + +663. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations cont Siii taragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +664. This is a claim for aiding and abe + +665. As described more fully t a e, eals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi sch , his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +666. knew of Rothstci 's fraudulent scheme. + +667. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including D3, through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +668. actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT DOCVIII - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +669. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +670. This is a claim for conversion. + +671. As described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with D3's 513,500,000.00 in funds. + +672. Rothstein's conversion of D3's finds has permanently deprived D3 of its property. + +673. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by D3 to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +674. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Spinosa) + +675. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +676. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +677. As described more fully above, the deals in which 133 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with 133's \$13,500,000.00 in funds. + +678. Rothstein's conversion of D3's funds has permanently deep • ed 133 of its property. + +f a" 0 679. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country aver emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by 133 to make demand upon him for tl, of its property would be futile. + +680. Spinosa actively assisted, and pm \tansu ti al assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving roperty by deceiving D3 into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +681. Spinosa's actions e directly caused injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 C I CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensato Court deems pro ages, together with court costs and such further relief as the + +#### T LXXX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +682.' Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +683. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +684. As described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In + +furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with D3's S13,500,000.00 in funds. + +685. Rothstein's conversion of D3's funds has permanently deprived D3 of its ProPerly. + +686. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by D3 to make demand upon him for the return of property would be futile. + +n .) + +687. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided sub istance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving D3 of its p\by deceiving D3 into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. -S , + +A 688. Kerstetter's actions have directly caus injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LVOCI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +689. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +690. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +691. As described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +692. Caretsky knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +693. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of D3 through fraud. Caretsky's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to D3 that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +694. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to D3 + +695. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damages + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests jud t a ainst ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXII - AIDING AND A(INNG CONVERSION (against TD N.A.) + +696. Plaintiff incorporates the a atio ntained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +697. This is a claim focacc141ing / end abetting conversion. + +698. As described, more fully above, the deals in which En invested were bogus and Rothstein was op mg a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the prop when he absconded with D3's \$13,500,000.00 in funds. + +699. Rothstein's conversion of D3's funds has permanently deprived D3 of its property. + +700. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by D3 to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +701. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment for TD Bank. + +702. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +703. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TO Bank. + +704. TD Bank, through its employees while acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either / temporarily or permanently depriving D3 of its property by allowing Rothstein to make unauthorized withdrawals of its funds and by deceiving D3 into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +705. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems Proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXIII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Debra M) + +706. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +707. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +708. As described more fully above, the deals in which D3 invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with D3's \$13,500,000.00 in funds. + +709. Rothstein's conversion of D3's funds has permanently deprived D3 of its property. + +710. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by 133 to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +711. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving D3 of its property by deceiving D3 into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +712. actions have directly caused injury and damages to D3. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +## COUNT LXXXIV - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION (against TD Bank N.A.) + +713. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +714. This is a claim for negligent supervision. + +715. As described more fully above, Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky participated, with actual or constructive knowledge, in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's participation included, but was not limited to, providing D3 with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +716. In reliance on Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's representations, on October 21, 2009, D3 began sending payments to RRA's account at TD Bank, eventually funding a total Am, of \$13,500,000.00. + +717. D3's reliance on Spinosa's, Kcrstetter's, and Caretsky' tations was reasonable and justified. + +718. TD Bank owed a duty to D3 to ensure that its employees were not actively defrauding depositors by making false representations in order to trick them into making unsafe deposits into trust accounts that they knew or reasonably should have known were being raided by Rothstein. + +719. TD Bank breached its duties to D3 because it had actual or constructive notice that its assistant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either fraudulently or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted in the unauthorized raiding of investors' deposits, and acted unreasonably by failing to investigate or take corrective action. + +720. As `'a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's failure to investigate or take corrective action against Spinosa, Kerstetter, or Caretsky, D3 has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein) + +721. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +722. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +723. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a P i' k eme , through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +724. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein wine made material false statements and representations, including but not limited to representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +725. Rothstein intended BFMC to act on his knowingly false representations. + +726. BFMC justifiably relied upon Rothstein's representations to its detriment. + +727. As a direct and proximate result of Rothstein's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deans proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXVI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Spinosa) + +728. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +729. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +730. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +731. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +732. Spinosa intended BFMC to act on his knowingly false representations. + +733. BFMC justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +/ 734. As a direct and proximate result of Spinota's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXVII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +735. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herei + +7 s is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +737. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of TD Bank. + +738. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +739. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank, through Spinosa, knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +740. TD Bank, through Spinosa, intended BFMC to act on their knowingly false representations. + +741. BFMC justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, through Spinosa's representations, to their detriment. + +742. As a direct and proximate result of TD 3,piadc through Spinosa's, false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTME LI requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT LXXXV1II - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against David Boden) + +743. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated he + +7 rs is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +745. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +746. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Boden knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, making misleading and untrue assurances concerning the settlement agreements and accounts. + +747. Bodcn intended BFMC to act on his knowingly false representations. + +748. BFMC justifiably relied upon Boden's representations to its detriment. + +749. As a direct and proximate result of Boden's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment AVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and su id as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT LXXXVIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Andrew Barnett) + +750. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +751. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +752. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +753. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Barnett knowingly made material false statements and iejnesentations including, but not limited to, supplying BFMC with false information about the identity of the defendant who was purportedly funding the settlement. + +754. Bamett intended BFMC to act on his knowingly false representations. + +755. BFMC justifiably relied upon Bamett's representations to its detriment. + +756. As a direct and proximate result of Bamett's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against ANDREW BARNETT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XC - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Spinosa) + +757. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. gh 107 as if + +758. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +759. As described more fully above, Rothstein w operating a Ponzi schcme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +760. In furtherance of the Ponzi sch ppsa made material false statements and representations including, but not limit o, plying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untru surances concerning the settlement accounts. + +761. When making the false Vatements and representations, Spinosa either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +762. Spinosa owed BFMC a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that BFMC was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform it. + +763. Spinosa breached his duty to BFMC by making false representations with the intention that BFMC rely on them. + +764. BFMC justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +765. As a direct and proximate result of Spinosa's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +766. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 thwc gh 1 as if restated herein. O + +767. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +768. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acti li..o pe of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. "k ? + +769. As described more fully above, Roth was operating a Pond scheme through his firm, RRA, and through 'ID Bank. + +770. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, 'ID Bank, through Spinosa, made material false statements and representations, Inchicling, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts and providing misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts.. + +771. this making the false statements and representations, TD Bank, through Spinosa, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +772. TD Bank owed BFMC a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that BFMC was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on it to inform them. + +773. TD Bank breached its duty to BFMC by making false representations, through Spinosa, with the intention that BFMC rely on them. + +774. BFMC justifiably relied upon TD Bank's, through Spinosa's, representations to its detriment. + +775. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's representations, made through Spinosa, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests judgment ag N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such fu deems proper. TD BANK, the Court + +#### COUNT XCII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENATION (against Andrew Barnett) + +776. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein, + +777. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +778. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through \ I his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +779. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Bamett made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying BFMC with false information about the identity of the defendant who was purportedly funding the settlement. + +780. When making the false statements and representations, Barnett either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +781. Barnett owed BFMC a duty of care by affirmatively and voluntarily undertaking to offer BFMC information. + +782. Barnett breached his duty to BFMC by making false representations with the intention that BFMC rely on them. + +783. BFMC justifiably relied upon Bamett's representations to its detriment. + +784. As a direct and proximate result of Bamett's false statements, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against ANDREW BARNETT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Spinosa) + +785. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +786. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +787. Spinosa was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where BFMC's purported settlement funds were depOiited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. Spinosa was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which D3 had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein i z had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. + +788. Spinosa was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +789. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstcin in his financial exploitation of BFMC and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +790. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCIV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against ID Bank, N.A.) + +791. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs\_ i J V 107 as if restated herein. + +792. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fi + +793. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was actieg C)in pc of his employment as Regional Vice President of TD Bank. + +S 4 794. ID Bank was aware that as trus purported settlement funds were deposit o 'n had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, alto t 'Lie < 4 attorney trust account where BFMC's and care to BFMC. TD Bank are that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. + +795. TD Bank was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +796. TD Bank, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +797. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against David Boden) + +798. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 107 as if restated herein. + +799. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiducia + +800. Boden was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where BFMC's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fithiciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. Boden was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. + +801. Boden was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +802. Boden actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +803. Boden's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DAVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Debra M) + +804. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +805. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +806. was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account ere BFMC's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of\_honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive, right to, collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, anuare to BFMC. + +807. was aware that Rothstei 4pis, ncially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein w brewing his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +808. actively assi kat rovidcd substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC endhis 6Feaches of fiduciary duty. + +809. actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCVII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +810. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +811. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +812. As trustee of the attorney trust account where BFMC's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honest, loyalty, A'ast and care to BFMC. + +813. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the RRA tie unts for his personal use. C ) + +814. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCVIII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +815. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +816. This a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +817. ti es material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional resident of TD Bank. + +818. In Florida, a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with its customer under special circumstances where the bank knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to so counsel and inform him. Under the circumstances outlined above, whereby TD Bank knew that BFMC was relying on Spinosa's assurances to BFMC of the precautions in place to prevent improper withdrawals from its + +account, TD Bank was a fiduciary of BFMC and owed BFMC the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +819. TD Bank breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of BFMC. + +820. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCIX - AIDING ANICA:1TTING FRAUD (against Frank Spinosa) + +821. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +822. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +823. As described tnore fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating 'a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +824. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +825. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included, but was not limited to, supplying BFMC with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +826. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT C - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +827. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs gh 107 as if restated herein. + +828. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +829. As described more fully above, the deals in rback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through bis firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +830. At all times material hereto Sp Spading in the scope of his employment for TD Bank. + +831. 'ID Bank knew of Ro udulcnt scheme. + +832. TD Bank, through Spino actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to BFMC that the RRA trust accounts contained'substantial funds when they did not and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +833. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against David Boden) + +834. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +835. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +836. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +837. Boden knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +838. Boden actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. Boden's assistance included, but was not limited to, making assurances to BFMC that there were safeguards in place to protect its deposits, all the time knowing that no such safeguards existed. + +839. Boden's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC' INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DAVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Debra M) + +840. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +841. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +842. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +843. knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +844. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including BFMC, through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +845. actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CIII - AIDING AND ABE1TING FRAUD (against Andrew Barnett) + +846. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +847. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +848. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +849. - Barnett knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +850. Bamctt actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including BFMC, through fraud. Barnett's assistance included, but was not limited to, supplying BFMC with false information about the identity of the defendant who was purportedly funding the + +settlement despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the settlements were part of a Ponzi scheme. + +851. Bamett's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against ANDREW Atit BARNETT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such furth relief as the Court deems proper. + +CO + +852. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations cont graphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +#### COUNT CI V - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +853. This is a claim for conversion. + +854. As described more fully a ?e, Sby deats in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Po • • rough his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi schematoth ein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +855. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +ased upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +857. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Spinosa) + +858. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrap 107 as if restated herein. + +859. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +860. As described more fully above, the deals On FMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exerased unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with D3's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +861. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +862. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +863. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +864. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT CVI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against TO Bank, N.A.) + +865. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrap restatcd herein. 107 as if + +866. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +867. As described more fully above, the deals VIii C invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with BPMC \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +868. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +869. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BPMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +IL...) 87Ntib kt all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment \ for TD Bank. + +871. TD Bank, through its employees while acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by allowing Rothstein to make restated herein. 873. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if + +874. This is a claim for aiding and a S S? + +unauthorized withdrawals of its funds and by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +872. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CVII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against David Boden) + +875. As described more fully a e, t deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzj4 through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when heabsconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +876. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +877. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +878. Boden actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +879. Boden's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DAVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Debra la + +880. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +881. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion: + +882. As described more fully above, the deal ywhich BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme trot\* firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +883. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +884. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +885. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +886. actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +restated herein. kA 888. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs , '41 107 as if 11. + +889. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +Complaint + +887. WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### (against Andrew Barnett) COUNT CIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION + +890. As described more fully above, the deals fof MC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with 13FMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +891. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +892. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +893. Barnett actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +894. Bamett's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against ANDREW BARNETT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CX - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION (against TB Bank, N.A.) + +895. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 107 as if restated herein. + +896. This is a claim for negligent supervision. + +897. As described more fully above, Spinosa \*th actual or constructive knowledge, in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Spinosa's participation included, but was not limited to, providing BFMC with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts and supplying investors with mi in' and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +898. In reliance on Si,': representations, on October 15, 2009, BFMC wired \$2,400,000.00 to RRA's TO Bank account. + +899. BFMC's reliance on Spinosa's representations was reasonable and justified. + +900. TD Bank owed a duty to BFMC to ensure that its employees were not actively defrauding depositors by making false representations in order to trick them into making unsafe deposits into trust accounts that they knew or reasonably should have known were bcing raided by Rothstein. + +901. TD Bank breached its duties to BFMC because it had actual or constructive notice that its assistant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either + +fraudulently or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted in the unauthorized raiding of investors' deposits, and acted unreasonably by failing to investigate or take corrective action. + +902. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's failure to investigate or take corrective action against Spinosa, BFMC has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such fu yy is the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXI - CIVIL CONSPI (against Scott Rothstein,' + +903. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations t paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +904. This is a claim for civil co i 'racy. + +' 905. As described more y to Rothstein, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M , Barnett, Prove, and T owing,ly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Rothstein acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of his and'the othcr co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than his own blatant fabrications. + +906. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +907. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, la Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +908. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Bamett, Prevc, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. s conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continu e Plaintiffs damages. + +909. Rothstein and his co-conspirators' conduct has caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDIN INVESTEMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as rustec of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. ASb3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC + +#### COUNT CXII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +910. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +911. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +912. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +913. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of T.D. Bank. + +914. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +915. As described more fully above, TD Bank, acting through its employees, and Rothstein, Bodcn, Barnett, and Preve knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, TD Bank acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +916. TD, through its employees, and Rothstein, Boden, Barnett, and Prevc acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +917. The overt acts of TD Bank, Rothstein, Boden, MI, Barnett and Preve were contrary to law, as stated above. + +918. There was a meeting of the minds between and among TD Bank, through its employees, and Rothstein, Boden, M, Barnett, Prcve, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +919. "ID Bank's and its co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT, LW, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY + +TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXIII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Spinosa) + +920. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraph gh 107 as if restated herein. + +921. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. a22. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spit, Ac ) erstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Spinosa acted with, full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. i + +923. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respeettve roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +924. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett Preve, and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +925. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M., Barnett, Preve, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy + +to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +926. Spinosa's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON A LMEN DYNASTY r 14/ ' TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and 1CRETSCHMAR request tent against SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court coe such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXIV - CIVIL CO RACY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +927. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +928. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +929. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Bodcn, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi stheme. In doing so, Kerstetter acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +930. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described above supra, according to a predetermined and + +commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +931. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Prove, and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +932. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +933. Kerstetter's and her co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC 1NVESTEMENT, LW, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXV - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +934. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +935. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +936. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M , Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the + +illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Caretsky acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +937. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Bamett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predeiennined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +938. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and 'I'D Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +939. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Carctsky, Bodcn, a, Barnett, Preve, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +940. Caretslcy's and her co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiff& + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT, LW, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXVI - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against David Boden) + +941. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +942. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +943. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, , Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Boden acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +944. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +945. The/ overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, and ID Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +946. -\_11tere was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Prevc, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +947. Boden's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN ASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgmea tnst DAVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and su relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXVII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Debra Villegas) + +948. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +949. This is a claim for civil co + +950. As described more Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Carctsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +951. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +952. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +953. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Prcve, TD Bank, and other individuals and AN, entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continu damages. Plaintiffs + +954. to Plaintiffs. and her co-conspirators' conduct has t caused injury and damage + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDIN 1NVESTEMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC stee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and DEAN KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXVIII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Andrew Barnett) + +955. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107 as if restated herein. + +956. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +957. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M , Barnett, Preve, and TO Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +958. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Carctsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in thcir respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +959. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated aboVe. + +960. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Preve, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +961. Barnett's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT,, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY \ — TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ANDREW BARNETT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXIX - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Preve) + +962. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107 as if restated herein. + +963. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +964. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinoza, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M , Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Preve acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +965. Rothstein, Spinoza, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Bodcn, M, Barnett, Preve, and TD Bank acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +966. The, overt acts of Rothstein, Spinoza, Kerstetter, Carctsky, Bodcn, Bamctt, Prev 'and TD Bank were contrary to law, as stated above. + +961. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinoza, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barnett, Preve, TD Bank, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +968. Preve's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTEMENT, LLC, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such firth f as the Court deems proper. + +# DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL + +Plaintiffs hereby demands a trial by jury as to all issues so triable by right. + +CONRAD & SCHERER, LLP + +Attorneys for Plaintiffs + +'4 633 South Federal Highway, 8th Floor + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Tel: (954) 462-5500 + +Fax: (954) 463-9244 + +BY: + +Florida Bar No.: 169454 + +**APP.18** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 09-61780-CIV-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM + +UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, + +v. + +Plaintiff; + +VARIOUS REAL PROPERTIES PURCHASED BY OR WITH OR O1i BEHALF OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, SPECIFICALLY: + +- (1) REAL PROP RTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 307 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDAL FLORIDA; +- (2) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 308 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALH, FLORIDA; &lt; C):49 (3) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENAN4 LOCATED AT 316 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (4) REAL PROERTY AND APPUR LOCATED AT 30 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (5) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 29 ISLA BAHIA DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; +- (6) REAL PRO,ERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 350 SE 2ND STREET, UNIT 2840, FORT LAUDEaDALE, FLORIDA; +- (7) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT t 310 CARRINGTON DRIVE, WESTON, FLO DA; 1 +- (8) REAL PROPSERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 133 IMPERIAL POINT DRIVE, FORT LAUDE ALE, FLORIDA; + +AND INCLUDI REAL PROPER VESSELS("VV BANK ACCOU INTERESTS ("I SPECIFICALLY G THE FOLLOWING LIES ("RP"), VEHICLES & '), TANGIBLES ("T"), TS ("BA"), BUSINESS I") AND CONTRIBUTIONS ("C"), + +(RP9) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 3627 CASTILLA ISLE, FORT LAUDEITALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP10) REAL P OPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT 0630 NW 14Th STREET, APT. 110, PLANTATION, FLORIDA; + +(RPII) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, LOCATED AT /27 GARDEN COURT, LAUDERDALI BY THE SEA, FLORIDA; + +(RP12) REAL PROPERTY AND APPURTENANCES LOCATED AT 708 SPANGLER BOULEVARD, , ., BAY 1, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA; + +(RPI3) REAL P LOCATED AT FORTLAUDEI OPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, 012 EAST BROWA ULEVARD, DALE, FLORIDA. + +(RP14) REAL PROPERTY AND 4ENANCES, LOCATED AT 9' 50 N FEDERAL HIGHWAY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; + +(RP15) REAL P LOCATED AT COMMERCIAL FORT LAUDEF 1.OPERTY AND APPURTENANCES, 50 LAS OLAS BOULEVARD, UNIT 2, DALE, FLORIDA; + +(VV I ) 1990 Rsq FERRARI F40 COUPE, VIN: ZFFMN34A5L0087066; + +(VV2) 2009 CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCBDI1129C059672; + +(VV3) 2008 YELLOW MCLAREN MERCEDES BENZ SLR, VIN: WDDAK761,98M001788; + +(VV4) 2007 BLIqcx LimousrNEM EXPEDITION, VIN: 1 F1 FK155 7LA59223; + +(VV5) 2009 RE VIN: ZFFEW59 **FERRARI** 430 SPIDER, 380163011; + +(VV6) 2007 SIL ER ROLLS ROYCE CONVERTIBLE, VIN: SCAlL68157UX23044; + +(VV7) 2006 SrL ER HUMMER HI, VIN: 137PH843 6E220665; + +(VV8) 2008 CAI ILLAC ESCALADE, VIN: IGYEC63 58R234458; + +(VV9) 1967 RE CONVERTIBLE CORVETTE, VW:194677Si 745; + +(VV10) 2009 BLACK BuGArri VEYRON EB 16.4, VIN: VF9SA25 28M795153; + +(VV11) 2008 B ROLLS ROYCE DROPHEAD C VIN: SCA2D68 28UX 16071; + +(VV12) 2006 D FERRARI F430 SPIDE .14 ....,.8.' YIN: ZFFEW59 560148863; + +(VV13) 2008 C VROLET COR YIN: 1O1 YY26 485120085; + +(VV14) 2009 C VROLE Z06, YIN: IGIYZ26 99511192 ; + +(VV15) 200913E YIN: ZAMGJ45 GRAY MASERATI GRANTURISMO COUPE, A090042326; + +(VV16) 2009 WHITE MERCEDES BENZ, VIN: WDBSK7 F159F49477; + +(VV17) 2007 87 HULL # WAR87 776707; (VV18) 33' AQu RIVA, HULL # XFA3311 74G405; + +(VV19) 200911 YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL # YAMA3 611809; + +(VV20) 200911' YAMAHA VS, HULL # YAMA3 26I809; + +(VV21) 200911 YAMAHA VS, HULL #YAMA2 79G809; + +(VV22) 1999 55' SEA Ray 540 SUNDANCER, HULL # SERY0 1899; + +(VV23) 2009 YAMAHA JET SKI, HULL # YAMA4I288K809. + +(VV 24) 2010 WLITE LAMBORGIIINI LP-670SV, VIN: ZHWBU8AHXALA03837; + +(VV25) MERCE ES BENZ S65 VR BYTURBO, VIN: WDDEJ79 8A015189, FLORIDA TAG V490; + +(VV26) 2009 BMW CON VER VIN: WBALM5 529E160836; + +(VV27) 2009 M RCEDES B SLK 350 CONVERTIBL , VIN: WDBWK 8F19F190779; + +ES OF JEWELRY; (T1) 304 PIE + +NT LIGHTERS; (T2) 16 D P + +SPORTS MEMORABILIA; (T3) + +IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; (T4) \$27 ,16 + +UNITED STATES CURRENCY; (r5) \$1,500 + +AMERICAN EXPRESS (T6) \$30,000 GIFT CARDS; + +(17) \$50,000 N AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CARDS; + +(T8) 5 ADDI IONAL WATCHES; + +(T9) GUITAR COLLECTION; + +(BA l) FIDELI1 Y INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT, IN THE NAME OF CO W. ROTHSTEIN, VALUED AT APP OXIMATELY \$1,263,780; + +(BA2) GIBRA AR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF WAWW 3 LLC, IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$117,032.76; + +(BA3) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$53,448.5 I ; + +(BA4) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROX TE AMOUNT OF \$71,793.06; + +(BA5) GIBRALTAR BANK ACCOUNT IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF \$995,521. + +(BA6) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, B ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF COTT ROTHSTEIN, IN THE APPROXIMATE OUNT OF \$12,000,000; + +Cos + +(BA7) BANK POPULAIRE, MOROCCO, ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF (kHNICK iCHALTD, UP TO THE AMOUNT i OF \$2,000,000; + +(BA8) BANK P/OPULAIRE, MOROCCO, ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF TEVE CAPUTI, UP TO THE AMO OF \$1,000,000; + +(BI1) CERTIFICATES OR BENEFICIAL MIST IN %No SHARES OF CAPITAL IN GIBRALTAR PRIVATE BANK & TRUST; + +(812) Scorr W. ROTIISTEDeS EQUITY INTEREST IN QTASK; + +(BD) ScotT BROWARD BA . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN OF COMMERCE; + +(314) Scorr BOVA RISTORA . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN E; + +(BI5) Scorr BOVA CUCINA; . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN + +(BI6) Scorr BOVA PRIME; . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN + +(BI7) SCOTT w. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN CAFE IGUANA, FIIEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA; + +(BIB) SCOTT . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN CART SHIELD U A, LLC; + +(BI9) SCOTT Vj'. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN RENATO WATC + +(BM) SCOTT EDIFY LLC; . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTERESTS, + +(BIII) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN V GEORGIO VODKA; + +(BII2) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN SEA CLUB; + +(BI l3) SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN NORTH STAR M RTGAGE; + +(BI14) SCOTT KIP HUN IIKETiNG; ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN + +(BI15) S RRA SPORTS A ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; + +(B116) SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN VERSACE MANS ON/CASA CASUARINA, INCLUDING 10 YEAR OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH 2 TEN YEAR OPTIONS; SA + +(BI17) SCOTT /. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST, AND LICENSING RIG S, IN ALTERNATIVE BioFuEL COMPANY; + +(BI18) SCOTT V1'. ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN RRA GOAL LI MANAGEMENT; + +(BI19) SCOTT V . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN IRON STREET M NAGEMENT, LLC; + +(8120) SCOTT W . ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND LOAN TO, AFFUCAT EQUITY IG DECIDE; + +7 + +(BI21) SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, AND RENTS DE ED FROM BUCKY'S BBQ, LOCATED AT 1198 N. OL DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA; + +(B122) Scorr AND RENTS DE AT 1299 FEDEI ROTHSTEIN'S EQUITY INTEREST IN, ED FROM THE CAR WASH LOCATED HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA + +(BI23) PROMIS ORY Nom BY UNIGLOBE IN FAVOR OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN; + +?Ss\ (BI24) ALL EQ TY INTEREST HELD BY N BEHALF OF SCOTT W. R THSTEIN, IN VARIO TIONS AND ENTITIES; + +(C1) \$6,000 CAMPAIGN C UTIONS MADE TO ALEX SINK ;AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES ON BEHALF OF ALEX SINK; + +(C2) \$40,000 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PA TY OF FLORIDA, "FLORIDA" ACCOUNT AND VOLUNTAR LY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED ST TES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C3) \$10,000 N CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN PA TY OF FLORIDA, "FEDERAL" ACCOUNT AND VOLUNTARILY OFFERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; (C4) \$90,000 REPUBLICAN PA OFFERED, AND BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; N CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO Te OF FLORIDA AND VOLUNTARILY ED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATES + +(C5) \$5,000 IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN P TY OF FLORIDA BY ROTHSTEIN BUSINESS KNOWN AS WAWW AND VOLUNTARILY 0 FERED, AND TURNED OVER, TO THE UNITED STATESIt3Y THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA; + +(C6) \$800,00 CHARITABLE DONATION TO JOE DIMAGolo HILDFtEN'S HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL ADVIS .D THE UNITED STATES OF THE DONATION FRO, THE ROTHSTEIN FAMILY FOUNDATION; + +(C7) \$1,000,000 CHARITABLE DONATION TO HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, WHICH HOSPITAL ADVISED THE UNITED STATEOF THE DONATION FROM THE ROTHSTEIN FA ILY FOUNDATION; + +(C8) \$9,600 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS GOVERNOR CH RLIE CRIST AND VOLUNTARILI14/ OFFERED, AND T FtNED OVER, TO THE UNITED BY THE OFFICE OF CHARLIE CRIST; + +AND + +(C9) ALL FUNS VOLUNTARI TURNED OVER TO THE UNITED STATES (IRS/FBI) SINCE IN OR ABOUT OCTOBER 28, 2009 IN RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY INVOLVING SCO W. ROTHSTEIN, + +# + AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM + +Plaintiff United States of America, hereby files this amended verified civil complaint for forfeiture in rem and states as follows: + +endants. + +#### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +I. phis is a civil action for forfeiture in rem for various real and personal properties, acquired, owne obtained, funded or purchased, in whole or in part, by, with, at the direction of, or on behalf of, Scott W. Rothstein, individually, jointly, as alter ego of, and/or in conjunction with various entities The properties, real and personal, hereinafter collectively known as "the defendants" or ' the defendant properties," violated 18 U.S.C. §1343, and/or 18 11:\$.C. §1957, and/or 18 U.S. . §1956 thereby subjecting the defendant properties to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a) I )(C) and/or pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A). + +2. he defendants consist of: + +A. Real Properties ("RP"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant real properties," are situated in Broward County in the Southern District of Florida, and e located at: + +(RP1) 2307 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP 1 ," includes all, buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein orliftercon, and is more particularly described as Lauderdale Shores Reamen Plat4541 B Lot 2 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0210; + +(RP2) 2 68 tastilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP2," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Ricamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 2 Blk 4 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0020; + +(RP3) 2 16 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant 3," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements fIund therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores leamen Plat 15-31 B Lot 3 & Lot 4 W % Blk 4 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0 30; + +(RP4) 3 Isla Bahia Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant 7 4," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements f und therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Isla Bahia 47-27 B t 63 with a Folio Number of 5042 13 16 0640; + +(RPS) 2 Isla Bahia Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant 5," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements f und therein or thereon, and is more part' sirul ely described as: Isla Bahia 47-27 B • t 35 with a Folio Number of 504 x11-Sep d + +(RP6) 3 0 SE r d Street, Unit 2840, ASaud ale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "fefendant RP6," includes that portion of the condominium, improvements, fl. tures, attachments and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: 350 Las Olas Place Condo Unit 2840 with a Folio Number of 5042 10 AN 1490; + +1 (RP7) 3 U Otngton Drive, Weston, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements 1÷ " f und therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Sector 4 North 153- 4 B Lot 24 Blk A with a Folio Number of 5039 01 02 0240; + +(RP8) 2 33 Imperial Point Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as fendant RP8," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and + +ements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Imperial P int 1 Sec 53-44 B Lot 11 Blk 22 with a Folio Number of 4942 12 07 2020; + +(RP9) 2 27 Castilla Isle, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant P9," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements f and therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores eamem Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13'0380; (RP10)1 630 NW 141° Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as " efendant RP 10," includes that portion of the condominium/townhome, i provements, fixtures, attachments and easeme is found therein or thereon, and is ore particularly described as: OPTIM AsV' i GE 1-"C" CONDO UNIT 201 LDG 2 with a Folio Number of 49 -Skc 110; (RP11) 27 Garden Court, Lauderd y e ea, Florida, hereafter also referred to as ' s \, " efendant RP11," includes that portion of the buildings, improvements, fixtures, clunents and easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly d scribed as: SILVER SHORES UNIT A 28-39 B POR of Lot 4, BLK 5 DESC AS TO BEG AT SE COR SAID LOT 4, N 79.37 W 37.75, S 79.37, E 35.75 TO POB AKA: UNIT E MARINA VILLAGE TOWNHOMES 227GARDEN with a Folio 1N umber of 4943 18 24 0050; (R1312) 08 Spangler Boulevard, Bay 1, Hollywood, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RPI2," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and erements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: HARBOR MIEW 10-5 B PORTION OF LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 2 DESC AS COMM 25 S OF NE j OR OF LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG S/R/W/L OF ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.92, N 7.66, W 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO POB AKA: BAY 1 PORTSIDE with a Folio Number of 5042 23 28 0010; + +(RP13) 012 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP13," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments aid easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: BEVERLY HEIGHTS 1-30 B LOT 1 W 100, LOT 2 W I with a Folio umber of 5042 11 07 0540; + +(RP14) 50 N Federal Highway, Fort Lauderdale, FlorithNhereafter also referred to as " efendant RP14," includes all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments and e ements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly described as: 31-48-43 SI 150 OD FOL DESC, BEG INTER E R/W/L ST RD 5, N TO POB with a Folio Number of 4843 31 00 0401 + +(RP15) 350 Las Olas Boulevard, Commercial Unit 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred I fixtures, descri o as "Defendant RP15," includes all portion of that condominium, improvements, Machine d easements found therein or thereon, and is more particularly 0 LAS OLAS PLACE COMM CONDO UNIT CU2 with a Folio Number of 51 1:1 0020. + +Stehicles and Vessels ("VV"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant vehicles:" + +(VV1) 1p90 Red Ferrari F40 Coupe, VIN: ZFFMN34A5L0087066; + +(VV2) 21/09 Convertible, VIN: SCBDR33W29C059672; + +(VV3) 2 8 Yellow McLaren Mercedes Benz SLR, VIN: WDDAK76F98M001788; + +(VV4) 2 7 Black Limousine Expedition, VIN: IFIFK15557LA59223; + +(VV5) 2 9 Red Ferrari 430 Spider, VIN: ZFFEW59A380 163011; + +(VV6) 2 7 Silver Rolls Royce Convertible, VIN: SCA1L68557UX23044; + +(VV7) 2 6 Silver Hummer HI, VIN: 137PH84396E220665; + +(VV8) 2 8 Cadillac Escalade, VIN: IGYEC63858R234458; + +(VV9) 1 67 Red Convertible Corvette, VIN: 194677S104745; + +(VVIO) 009 Black Bugatti Veyron EB 16.4, VIN: VF9SA25C28M795153; + +(VV11) 008 Blue Rolls Royce Drophead Convertible, VIN: SCA2D68528UX16071; + +(VV12) 006 Red Ferrari F430 Spider, VIN: ZFFEW59A560148863; + +(VV13) 008 Chevrolet Corvette, VIN: 1GIYY26W485120085; + +(VV14) 009 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, VIN: IGIYZ26E995111923; + +(VV15) 2009 Blue Gray ■serati **Granturismo Coupe, VIN: ZAMGJ45A090042326;** + +**(VV16) 2009 Mercedes Benz, VIN WDBSK71F159F49477;** + +**(VVI7) 007 87' Hull # WAR87777B707;** + +**(VV18) 3' Aquariva, Hull # XFA33R74G405;** + +**(VV19) 00911' Yamaha Jet Ski, Hull # YAMA3661I809;** + +**(VV20) 009 11' Yamaha VS, Hull # YAMA3626I809;** + +**(VV21) 009 11' Yamaha VS, Hull #YAMA2679G809;** + +**(VV22) 999 55' Sea Ray 540 Sundancer, SERY001899;** + +**(VV23) 2009 Yamaha Jet Ski, Hull # YAMA4288K809;** + +**(VV 24) 2010 Lamborghini 1p-670sv, VIN: ZHWBUSAHXALA03837;** + +(VV25) ercedes Benz S65 VR Byturbo, VIN: WDDEJ79XX8A015189; + +(VV26) 009 RED BMW CONVERTIBLE, VIN: WBALM53529E160836; + +(V V27) 09 MERCEDES BENZ SLK 350 CONVERTIB LE, VfN: WDBWK58F19F190779; + +C. angibles ("T"), hereinafter referred to collectively as "the defendant tangibles:" + +(TI) 3B4 pieces of jewelry, watches, necklaces and earrings seized on or about Monday, ovember 9, 2009 from the residence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; + +(T2) 1 DuPont Lighters seized on or about Monday, Novergb. Q09 from the r idence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstein; + +(T3) 3 pieces sports memorabilia seized on or about Mondgy,November 9, 2009 from the sidence of Scott and Kimberly Rothstei + +(T4) \$ 71,160 in United States currency r about Monday, November 9, 2009 f m the residence of Scott and'if ber Rothstein; + +(T5) \$ ,500 in United States currency, seized on about Wednesday, November 4, 2009, f om the office of Scott W. Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and dler, P.A.; + +(T6) \$ 0,000 in American Express Gift Cards to the attention of Scott Rothstein, obtained m UPS on or about November 12, 2009; + +0,000 in American Express Gift Cards to the attention of Scott Rothstein, obtained Adi f.iom UPS on or about November 13, 2009; + +(T8) 5 additional watches being turned over to the United States by Les Stracher; + +(T9) uitar collection of Scott W. Rothstein, located at the residence of Scott and imberley Rothstein, valued between \$10,000 and \$20,000. + +#### D. B a nk Accounts ("BA"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant bank ounts:" + +(BA I ) F'delity II Investments a proximately \$1,263,780; Account, in the name of Scott W. Rothstein, valued at + +(BA2) G braltar Bank account a proximate amount of \$117,032.76; in the name of WAWW 3 LLC, in the + +(BA3) Gi raltar Bank account , in the approximate amount of \$53,448.51; + +(BA4) G raltar Bank account , in the approximate amount of \$71,793.06; + +(BA5) G. raltar Bank account , in the approximate amount of \$995,521.426; + +(BA6) B account n at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the e of Scott Rothstein, in the approximate amount of \$12,000,000; + +(BA7) Bank account at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Ahnick Khalid, up to the amount of \$2,000,000; + +(BA8) Bank account at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Steve Caputi, up to the arpount of \$1,000,000; + +# E. Bhsiness Interests ("BI"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant business interests:" + +(BI I) Stock certificates, if issued, or the beneficial interest in such shares, of 50,000 shares oi. capital M, in Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust, a federally chartered s vings association, purchased in or about September 2009 by GBPT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its manager, Bahia Property Management, L C, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; (BM) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; (BI3) SLott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (BM) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (BIS) Slott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (BI6) SL ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Prime; (B17) 5 ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Cafe Iguana, Pembroke Pin , ride; (B18) S[ ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Cart Shield USA, (BI9) Stott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Renato Watche , (BI10) S :ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Edify LLOrmiN (BI11) Szott W. Rothstein's equity interest in V Georgio Vodka; (BI12) Slott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Sea Club; (BI13) S tt W. Rothstein's equity interest in North Star Mortgage; (BI14) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Kip Hunter Marketing; (BI15) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Sports and Entertainment, LLC; (BI16) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Versace Mansion/Casa Casuarina, including I year Operating Agreement with 2 ten year options; (BI17) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest, and licensing rights, in Alternative Biofuel Company; (BI18) S (8119) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Goal Line Management; ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Iron Street Management, LLC; (BI20) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and loan to, Africat Equity IG Decide; (BI21) S ott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived from 1198 Dixie LLC; + +(BI22) SLtt W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived from 1299 Federal LLC; + +(8123) Promissory Note by Uniglobe in favor of Scott W. Rothstein; + +(BI24) A I equity interest held by or on behalf of Scott W. Rothstein, in the following corporations and entities: + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. +- h. +- I. +- k. +- 1. mi +- n. • +- o. +- P. +- 9. +- r. +- s. +- t. +- u. +- v. w BOVA Smoke LLC; ,'" BOVCU LLC; BOVRI LLC; Broward Financial Holdings, Inc.; C107 LLC; C108 LLC; C116 LLC; a•. CI27 LLC; a CSU LLC; a D & D Management & Investment LLC; ag. D & S Management and Investment LLC; ah. DJB Financial Holdings LLC; ai DYMMU LLC; 29 Bahia LLC; 235 GC LLC; 350 LOP#2840 LLC; 708 2 Brow Spangler LLC; 101 ard LLC; 1198 Dixie LLC; 353 BR LLC; 10630 #110 LLC; 1299 Federal LLC; AAM Holdings; AS \C9C 2133 IP LLC; 15158 LLC; AANG LLC; AAMG1 M LLC; ABT Investments LLC: Advanced Solutions; Bahia Property Management LLC; Boat Management LLC; BOSM Holdings LLC; BOVA Prime LLC; BOVA Restaurant Group LLC; The BOVA Group LLC; + +CO AS + +Full Circle Fort Lauderdale LLC; a Full Circle Trademark Holdings LLC; a GHW1 LLC; a IDNI, GEAH LLC; an. ILK3 LLC; a IS Management LLC; a JRCL LLC; a Judah LLC; Kendall Sports Bar; Kip Hunter Marketing LLC; NF Servicing LLC; a NRI 11 LLC; a . NRI 15 LLC; w. NS Holdings LLC; PRCH LLC; a PK Adventures LLC; PK's Ride Ltd; b . Rothstein Family Foundation; b . RRA Consulting Inc.; b . RRA Goal Line Management I.,, RRA Sports and Entertai b . RSA 111h Street LLC; b . RW Collections LLC. b . S & KEA LLC; it. Scorh LLC; b . Tipp LLC; b . VGS LLC;,., b . The Walter Famnf9 LLC; . Walter Industries LLC; bin. WPBRS LLC; b WAWW; . WAWW 2 LLC; . WAWW 3 LLC; WAWW 4 LLC; . WAWW 5 LLC; . WAWW 6 LLC; b . WAWW 7 LLC; . WAWW 8 LLC; bb. WAWW 9 LLC; blv. WAWW 10 LLC; bqc. WAWW 11 LLC; by. WAWW 12 LLC; b i . WAWW 14 LLC; + +Cos + +WAWW 15 LLC; c WAWW 16 LLC; c WAWW 17 LLC; c WAWW 18 LLC; WAWW 19 LLC; c WAWW 20 LLC; c WAWW 21 LLC; c WAWW 22 LLC; ci JB Boca M Holdings LLC; + +and + +F. ntributions ("C"), hereinafter collectively referred e defendant contributions:" + +- (Cl) \$ t ,000 in campaign contributions made to Alex Sink voluntarily offered, and t ed over, to the United States on behalf of Alex Sink; (C2) 0,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida, "Florida" account d voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party o Florida; (C3) \$ 0,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida, "Federal" a count and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the R publican Party of Florida; (C4) \$ 0,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida and voluntarily o ered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party of Florida; (C5) \$ ,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida by Rothstein b mess entity known as WAWW and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the ited States by the Republican Party of Florida; (C6) \$ 00,000 Charitable Donation to Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, which hospital + +a t vised the United States of the donation from the Rothstein Family Foundation; + +- (C7) \$ ti ,000,000 Charitable Donation to Holy Cross Hospital, which hospital advised the nitcd States of the donation from the Rothstein Family Foundation; (C8) \$ ,600 in campaign contributions to Governor Charlie Crist, voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the office of Charlie Crist; and (C9) 11 funds voluntarily turned over to the United States (IRS/FBI), or about ctober 28, 2009, in response to publicity regarding Scott o Lein.. +- 3. is Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.St i § 1, 1345 and 1355. +- 4. enue is proper in the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1355 (b)(1), 1355 (b) ) and 1395 because the defendant properties are located in the Southern District of Florida and/o because the acts or omissions giving rise to forfeiture occurred, at least in part, in the Southern Di trict of Florida and/or the properties will be brought into the Southern District of Florida. +- 5. Tlhe defendant real properties will not be seized, but will be posted with a summons/noticel of the complaint in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §985(c)(1) and (3). +- 6. t personal properties listed at (VV I ) through and including (VV23),(TI) through (T7), ( I) through (BA2), (BII) and (CI) through (C5) are already in possession of the United States p rsuant to lawfully issued forfeiture seizure warrants or turnovers. The remaining defendant perso al properties, will be further brought under the jurisdiction of the Court through the use of warrants of arrest in rem or protective orders, or other process, in accordance with the applicable statut + +#### FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS + +7. used upon the following information, there is probable cause to believe that the above-described defendant properties were acquired in connection with a "Ponzi" scheme, conducted by attorney Scot Rothstein, hereinafter "Rothstein," and others. + +8. othstein has operated the "Ponzi" scheme since at least approximately 2005. + +9. At all times relevant to this Amended Complaint, Rothstein was the first named partner of "Rot located in Fort 1 tein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A.," hereinafter referred to ' , " a law firm uderdale, Florida. + +10. through a feder c cording to witness complaints, and analysis allotments and records obtained search warrant, clients were solicited by, or on behalf of, Rothstein to invest in "settlements" in which putative plaintiffs in civil cases had entered into confidential settlement agreements with utative defendants based upon the forbearance of civil claims in sexual harassment and other labor-r lated cases. The potential investors were told that these settlements, which existed in blocks rangin from hundreds of thousands to millions o f doll ars, could be purchased at a discount and repaid to th investors at face value over time. Clients who agreed to invest were directed by Rothstein or oth rs to wire transfer funds to the trust account of "RRA." For example, in September 2009, one poten al investor was told that he could purchase a settlement valued at \$450,000.00 for II \$375,000. tip ch would be repaid in increments of \$150,000.00 per month for the following three months. Is Jo uld amount to a yield of 20 percent over three months, or an annual percentage yield in excess 480 percent. The investor was further told that the funds were held in the RRA trust account. The int stor was shown a purported wire transfer receipt as evidence that the funds were held in the trust account of RRA. + +11. e investigation has disclosed that the investments purportedly underlying the above-described! investment scheme never existed. The investigation has established that no such settlement agree transactions con investors in furti investments had ments had ever existed and the entire investment scheme was a fraud. These tituted a "Ponzi" scheme in which new investor money was utilized to pay previous erance of the scheme. The investigation has disclosed that these types of fraudulent been offered by Rothstein to a variety of persons and entities throughout the United States for at least four years, and the scheme involved hundreds of millions of dollars. Multiple bank accounts were utilized at financial institutions into which investors' money was sent by wire transfer across state line falsified docurm contained in the . Further, as a fraudulent inducement to investors, Roth. and co-conspirators nts which were presented to investors as proof that certain sums of money were e bank accounts when, in fact, the bank accounts did not contain these funds. + +12. were used to pay portions of the c he investigation has established that portions of the criminally derived proceeds past investors thereby promoting the scheme. The investigation has established that iminally derived proceeds were used to acquire millions of dollars worth of assets including the defendant properties set forth above. The investigation has further established that many of the defepdants were acquired in the name of, or were transferred to nominee corporations, controlled by Rothstein, such as those set forth at (B24), subparagraphs a. through ci. above, as a wealth preservat on mechanism. + +13. The investigation has established that Rothstein's financial ability to acquire the defendants did t exist prior to the execution of the "Ponzi" scheme. + +14. Based on a review of records obtained through the federal search warrant, the investigation hal established that, in one year, RRA had receivables of S8,000,000, while during that + +same year, sal es for the RRA work force were \$18,000,000. The additional \$10,000,000 for salaries, as well r the other expenses for operation of the law firm, came from the operation of, and the funds generated, by the "Ponzi" scheme. Funds used to acquire the defendants came from the "Ponzi" scheme and not from legitimate RRA funds. + +I5. othstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to acquire or direct the acquisition of th defendant real properties. + +- A. C Rothstein acquired Defendant RP I on or about Se tember 21, 2007 for a sales price of \$1,750,000. Defendant RP1 was transferred, via Quit •Qi Deed, to "Cl 07 LLC" on or about August 10, 2009. Rothstein acquired Defend or about March 3, 2005 for a sales price of \$2,730,000. 'Scut ecember 26, 2006, Rothstein obtained a \$2.8 million mortgage on R funds. Defend P2 was transferred, via Quit Claim Deed, to "C 108 LLC" on or abo Iy 22, 2009. ?S othstein acquired Defendant RP3 on or about March 14, 2007 for a sales price of \$1,925,000. Defendant RP3 was transferred, via Quit Claim Deed, to "C 1 16 LLC" on or about August 10, 2009. Rothstein and his wife Kimberly Rothstein acquired Defendant RP4 on or about March 14, 2008 for a sales price of \$6,450,000. which was then repaid with "Ponzi" scheme + +I I Defendant RPS, a vacant lot, was transferred to "29 Bahia LLC" on or about January 7, 2009, for a sales price of \$4,000,000. Defendant RP6 was transferred, via Warranty Deed, to "350 LOP #2840 LLC" on or about May 20, 2009 for \$435,700. WAWW4 LLC acquired Defendant RP7 on or about April 8, 2008 for a sales price of \$475,000. Defendant RP7 was transferred to Debra E. bout July 27, 2009 for \$100 via quit claim deed. ) WAWW19 LLC acquired Defendant RPM ongr about November 5, 2008 for a sales price of \$505,000. Defendant RP8 was transfe it \9, to 3 IP LLC" on or about August 10, 2009 via quit claim d iSc SI . N Rothstein acquired Defendant RP9 on or about June 19, 2003 for a sales price of \$1,800,000. While the "Ponzi" scheme was not operating at the time of the original pinches°, in or about 2005, Rothstein obtained a \$2.73 million Ip mo pe which was repaid with funds derived from the "Ponzi" scheme. Defendant RP9 was transferred via quit claim deed to CI27 LLC on or about August 10, 2009. Rothstein and Kimberly Rothstein acquired Defendant RP I 0 on or about August 11, 2008 for a sales price of \$260,000. WAWW LLC acquired Defendant RP11 on or about December 12, 2007 for a sales price of \$715,000. + +- WAWW LLC quit claimed Defendant RP 11 to 235 GC LLC on or about August 10, 2009. WAWW I 0 LLC acquired Defendant RP12 on or about September 10, 2008 for a sales price of \$765,000. WAWW LLC quit claimed Defendant RP12 to 708 Spangler LLC on or about August 10, 2009. 1012 Broward LLC acquired Defendant RP13 on or A t uary 12, 2009 for \$1.3 million. S D&S Management & Investments LLC endant RP14 on or about April 15, 2008 for \$2.75 million. Bova Smoke LLC acquired 9 er f 15 on or about December 29, 2008 for \$2.6 million. e 14/S" \\*- Bova Smoke LLC quit claimed Defendant RP15 on or about January 30, 2009 to BOSM Holdings LLC. +- 16. othstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to acquire or direct the acquisition of tle defendant vehicles. +- 17. othstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to acquire or direct the acquisition of defendant tangibles. +- 18. othstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to fund the defendant bank accounts. +- 19. othstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to acquire or direct the acquisition of hi share of the defendant business interests. + +20. Rothstein used proceeds obtained from the "Ponzi" scheme to fund or make the defendant contributions. + +# FIRST CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 1343 + +21. P aintiff realleges paragraphs 7 through 20, above, as if fully set forth herein. + +22. itle 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) subjects to forfeiture: "[a]ny property, real or rsonal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable t ... any offense constituting `s cified unlawful activity' (as defined in Section 1956( f this title, or a conspiracy to co it such offense." + +23. " pecified unlawful activity" is defined in I 6811.N. §1956(c)(7), and the term includes any off nse under 18 U.S.C. §1961(1). Section 1961(1) lists 18 U.S.C. 1343 (wire fraud) as an offense. + +24. 'Ile 18, United States Code, Section 1343 provides that: + +Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits, or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures or sounds for the urpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be ned... + +nzi" scheme investors utilized interstate wires to transfer their funds to RRA "trust" accounts + +fraud. 26. The millions of dollars generated by the "Ponzi" scheme constitute proceeds of wire 27. thstein used the proceeds of wire fraud to acquire the defendant properties. + +28. ed on the foregoing, the defendant properties constitute or were derived from proceeds traceable to the specified unlawful activity of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, S tion 1343, and are thereby forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, S lion 981(a)(1)( C). + +#### SECOND CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and 1957 + +29. P aintiff realleges paragraphs 7 through 20, above, as if t set rIh herein. + +30. tle 18, United States Code, Section 981(aXI)(A) jecis to forfeiture "[a]ny property, real or rsonal, involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section I957...of this itle, or any property traceable to such pmperty." + +31. tle 18, United States Code, Section 1957 provides in pertinent part: + +(a) Whoever, in any of the circumstances set forth in subsection (d), knowingly engages or attempts to engage in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of a value greater than \$10,000 and is derived from specified unlawful activity, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). + +4+4 + +(d) e circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are — 1) that the offense under this section takes place in ?S' the United States or in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States... + +etary transaction" is defined in 18 U.S.C. §1957(f)(1) as the: + +deposit, withdrawal, transfer, or exchange, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, of funds or a monetary instrument ... by, through, or to a financial institution (as defined in section 1956 of this title), including any transaction that would be a financial transaction under section 1956(c)(4)(B) of this title... 33. "financial transaction" is defined in 18 U.S.C. §1956(cX4) as: + +(A) a transaction which in any way or degree affects interstate or foreign commerce (I ) involving the movement of funds by wire or other means or (ii) involving one or more monetary instruments, or (iii) involving the transfer of title to any real property, vehicle, vessel or aircraft, or (B) a transaction involving the use of a financial institution which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce in any way or degree. + +34. 46 riminally derived property" is defined in 18 U.S.C. §1957(f)(2) as "any property constituting, or 4erived from, proceeds obtained from a criminal offe + +35. 1pecified unlawful activity" is defined in 18 . . 56(c)(7), and the term includes any offense under 18 U.S.C. §1961(1). Section 18 U.S.C. 1343 (wire fraud) as an offense. + +36. B derived property defendants are st ecause the funds used to acqa ArSIke < c\ efendan t properties, constitute criminally from wire fraud, exceed \$10,000 and were involved in a monetary transaction, the bject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(aX1)(A) as they represent properties involved in a transaction or aft traceable to suet' property led transaction in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1957, and properties + +#### THIRD CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and 1956 + +aintiff realleges paragraphs 7 through 20, above, as if fully set forth herein. + +38. Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(A) subjects to forfeiture "[ajny property, real o rsonal, involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956...of this tit 'e, or any property traceable to such property." + +- 39. llitle 18, United States Code, Section 1956 provides in pertinent part: + +( )(1) Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction, represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity — + +(A)( 1) with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity; ... 4a11 be sentenced. + +- 40. Ile 18, United States Code, Section 1956 further provides in pertinent part: + +For purposes of this paragraph, a financial transaction shall be considered to be one volving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity if it is part of a set of parallel o dependent transactions, any one of which involves the proceeds of specified u lawful activity, and all of which are part of a single plan or arrangement. + +- 41. " pecified unlawful activity" is defined in 18 U.S.C. §1956(c)(7), and the term includes any offense under 18 U.S.C. §1961(1). Section 1961(1) lists 18 U.S.C. 1343 (wire fraud) as an offense. + +42, e financial trans) tc cted by Rothstein in acquiring the defendants were done with the in ent to promo ng on of the "Ponzi" scheme. + +- 43. The use of the defendant properties by Rothstein, was done with the intent to promote the carrying on f the "Portal" scheme. + +- 44. s derived from the "Ponzi" scheme were used to acquire the defendant properties and enable Ro tein to live a lavish lifestyle, which provided the appearance of success and helped to promote the s heme. + +- 45. The defendant properties were involved in a transaction or attempted transaction, or were involved in transactions or attempted transactions, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1956 and are + +therefore subjec to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A). + +VVHE any claim to the as required by R Forfeiture Actio properties cond other and furthe action. FORE, Plaintiff, United States of America requests, that any and all persons having efendant properties be directed to file and serve their verified claims and answers le G(5), of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset , or suffer default thereof, and further requests that the Court declare the defendant ed and forfeited to the United States of America, and that Plaintiff have such relief as may be just and proper together with the costs and disbursements of this + +# CONCLUSION + +fly submitted, + +FREY H. SLOMAN TING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +Aar- )(2. itav + +ALISON W. LEHR ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Fla. Bar No. 444537 99 N.E. 4th Street- 71h Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Telephone: (305)961-9176 Fax: (305)536-7599 AlisonLehr®usdoj.gov + +#### VERIFICATION + +Pursuant fo Title 28, United States Code, Section 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury, that I e read the foregoing Amended Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, and state that + +the facts alleged therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Ekecu this ID day of November, 2009. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE + +-ducjit. TAR GUARIGLIA, cial Agent + +**APP.19** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# Scott Rothstein 'You're in a town full of thieves' + +By Brittany Wallman + +NOVEMBER 2a, 2009. cm PM + +PDATED + +A I he'll couple of brief exchanges with Scott Rothstein today:Most of it III have 11 p out. + +Suffice to say Rothstein had sompideas on what we could do in our sparpt Swther than trying to :interview his family members. + +Be was objecting to questions about his wife, Kimberly Ann W em. She's been silent throughout this ordeal. Her bodyguard, 'Joe "Meatballs" nickname froth his voice message), said she's a very private person, and doesn'tik , . Sheds reportedly still living\* the. house on Isla Bahia, but federal authorities took th eAf t, most of the cars, and even herjewelry; in the wake of accusations her husband was runn P\o ' scheme. + +I reached a cousin today at tier grandmot in North Carolina; I knocked' on hermiother's door in Plantation:Same story. No o tack about it.,Seotteatitirents, Harvey and Gay Rothstein, live indowntowdFort They're not running to the phone, either. T also dropped by the home of the woman i ed a paternity suit against, othstein years ago and is his .daughter's mom. NO one:hcim + +Soi asked Rothstein and he went on a profane rant, saying that We attire newspaper are "pigs" and giving essage for my editors that was not very thee. + +"You're hu aughter; you're hurting my son," he said fRothMhat a biiilOgleal daughter who is 16, and t son he's talking aboutis someone he took on as a sort of mentor, he said this summer.) + +"Haven't:Lalreadyhurt them enough?" he asked, before delivering a final "message" and hanging up. + +He called back this evening, responding to a text message. He said karma is going to get him, but it's going to get other-people, too., + +And with that, he hung up. + +Copyright © 2017, Sun Sentinel + +**This article is related to:** Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP. 20** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm + +The Miami Herald + +November 24, 2009 Tuesday + +Copyright 2009 The Miami Herald Al Rights Reserved + +# elle ainLIerala + +Found on Miami • corn. + +Section: B; Pg. 1 + +Length: 610 words + +Byline: JAY WEAVER AND SCOTT HIAASEN + +Meaven@MiamiHereld.corn + +# Body + +/ 4' Attorney Scott Rothstein tapped into millioris ordollars from his massive investment scam to cover payroll costs at his expanding Fort Lauderdale law firm,federal authorities said in court records released Monday. + +Rothstein's law firm generated revenue'oft\$8 millibn in one recent year, yet his 70-lawyer firm had a payroll of \$18 million, prosecutors said. Rothstein, who owned half of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up theandrtfall, they said. + +The allegations wore revealed in an amended forfeiture complaint against dozens of Rothsteln's real estate properties, foreign pars, restaurants and other assets -- including S12 million in the lawyer's bank account in Morocco, along with mIllidbs more donated to political campaigns and charitable funds. + +"Funds useq\* uire the [Rothstein' assets came from the 'Ponzi' scheme and not from legitimate RRA funds," Assistant U.S.'Attomey Alison W. Lehr wrote in rho amended forfeiture action. + +Rothstein, 47, fled to Morocco In late October with the collapse of his investment fund, which was built on bogus legal settlements sold to wealthy investors. After his return to South Florida in early November, FBI and IRS agents began seizing his assets and raiding his law firm. He has not been charged with a crime. + +The civil forfeiture is based on money-laundering allegations that Rothstein amassed his fortune by defrauding Investors, prosecutors said. Inveltors bought shares in his fabricated confidential settlements from employmentdiscrimination and other 'civil cases during the past four years -- investments that promised returns of up to 40. percent. + +Cos + +Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at taw firm + +Rothstein's partner, Stuart Rosenfeldt, who owned the other half of the now-defunct law firm, has said he was unaware of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the firm's finances, saying his partner was fully responsible. Rosenfeldt could not be reached for comment Monday. + +Rothstein's attorney, Marc Nurik, declined to comment. + +According to the forfeiture action, the U.S. government now wants to seize 15 parcels of South Florida real estate adding seven to the original list. Also seized were 20 cars — Including three Ferraris, three Corvettes, two Rolls-Royces, a limousine and a \$1.5 million Bugattl sports car — plus an 87-foot yacht, four personal watercraft, 304 pieces of Jewelry, a guitar collection, \$80,000 In American Express gift cards and \$272,000 in cash. . + +The government is also seeking the equity Rothstein has in about 21 different companies inutvh16 he Invested, including restaurants, a mortgage company, a sports agency, two banks and a \*fuel compat% + +Rothstein also had an overseas account with Bank Populaire In Morocco, where ifteThad \$12 million. Federal authorities are trying to seize an additional \$2 million hold in the same bank under,the Name Ah nick Khalid and a \$1 million account hold by Steve Capull, owner of the Cafe Iguana nightclub In Pembroke Pines: + +Another \$1.3 million is held in four accounts at Gibraltar Bank. And Rothstein hairet - /operate investment account holding \$1.2 million. + +Finally, the government Is seeking more than \$160,000 in politiCa, I/ contributions and charitable donations of \$800,000 to the Joe DIMaggio Children's Hospital in Hollywood, and 0 million to Holy Cross Hospital in Fort Lauderdale. + +Holy Cross officials announced last week that the hospital would return the \$1 million gift, which was to have been used fora new women's center with the name of Rottietein'S charitable foundation engraved over the entrance to the lobby. + +Miami Herald staff writer Amy Sherman con At c tll`ails report. + +Load-Date: January 22, 2010 + +End of Document + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e24706c7377359a63891d9690539ac78f2d8aa4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/EFTA02761748.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,10951 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 192, + "chars": 277135, + "elapsed_seconds": 36.9, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_8.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.2994689941406, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.2994689941406, + 232.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 232.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 341.5918273925781, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 341.5918273925781, + 492.35302734375 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 492.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiffs' Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 343.80096435546875, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 343.80096435546875, + 125.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 125.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Overview", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 323.34149169921875, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 323.34149169921875, + 591.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 591.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 477.36, + 59.94 + ], + [ + 529.85400390625, + 59.94 + ], + [ + 529.85400390625, + 74.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 477.36, + 74.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Plaintiffs", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 334.2568359375, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 334.2568359375, + 127.85302734375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 127.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Defendant - Principal Conspirators", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.228, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 401.3372497558594, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 401.3372497558594, + 223.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 195.228, + 223.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Defendants - Co-Conspirators", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 386.954833984375, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 386.954833984375, + 538.8530120849609 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 538.8530120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "77) Bank Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 174.04486083984375, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 174.04486083984375, + 565.9335174560547 + ], + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 565.9335174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RRA Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 592.11 + ], + [ + 151.9248504638672, + 592.11 + ], + [ + 151.9248504638672, + 607.5535125732422 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 607.5535125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Banyan Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 162.60548400878906, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 162.60548400878906, + 497.31353759765625 + ], + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 497.31353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 345.6783752441406, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 345.6783752441406, + 127.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 127.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Rothstein Facade", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 177.92291259765625, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 177.92291259765625, + 154.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 154.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Plan", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.2, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 112.9367446899414, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 112.9367446899414, + 551.613037109375 + ], + [ + 61.2, + 551.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Pitch", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 117.68211364746094, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 117.68211364746094, + 470.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 470.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ponzi Scheme In Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 361.3395080566406, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 361.3395080566406, + 442.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 442.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fabricated Settlements.Premised on Real Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 303.66748046875, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 303.66748046875, + 469.85302734375 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 469.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiffs' Investments:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 182.15548706054688, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 182.15548706054688, + 333.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 333.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Banyan Income Fund", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 190.89022827148438, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 190.89022827148438, + 361.1130065917969 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 361.1130065917969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Razorback Fatting, LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 210.96005249023438, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 210.96005249023438, + 525.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 525.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. 133 Capital ehiLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 537.0300000000001 + ], + [ + 186.048, + 537.0300000000001 + ], + [ + 186.048, + 553.1130218505859 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 553.1130218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. BFMC Investment, LLe", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.26, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 207.9532928466797, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 207.9532928466797, + 524.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 64.26, + 524.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 477.972, + 61.80889892578125 + ], + [ + 530.8245239257812, + 61.80889892578125 + ], + [ + 530.8245239257812, + 75.81353759765625 + ], + [ + 477.972, + 75.81353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Implosion of Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 399.3983459472656, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 399.3983459472656, + 129.35302734375 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 129.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pevastatine Fallout", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.636, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 351.5192565917969, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 351.5192565917969, + 417.35302734375 + ], + [ + 246.636, + 417.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jurisdiction and Venue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 358.09539794921875, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 358.09539794921875, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.508, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 440.5400390625, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 440.5400390625, + 143.613037109375 + ], + [ + 158.508, + 143.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 440.523681640625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 440.523681640625, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT III - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 444.2900390625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 444.2900390625, + 144.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 144.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT IV -FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 443.9263916015625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 443.9263916015625, + 144.35302734375 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 144.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT V - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.508, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 434.523681640625, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 434.523681640625, + 199.85302734375 + ], + [ + 158.508, + 199.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 437.9100341796875, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 437.9100341796875, + 250.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 250.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 439.4263916015625, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 439.4263916015625, + 249.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 249.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.308, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 498.24468994140625, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 498.24468994140625, + 441.35302734375 + ], + [ + 97.308, + 441.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT IX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 493.34381103515625, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 493.34381103515625, + 440.613037109375 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 440.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 490.028076171875, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 490.028076171875, + 440.613037109375 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 440.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.368, + 520.02 + ], + [ + 492.2447204589844, + 520.02 + ], + [ + 492.2447204589844, + 550.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 100.368, + 550.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XII \u2014 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 426.59381103515625, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 426.59381103515625, + 524.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 524.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XIII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.464, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 427.34381103515625, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 427.34381103515625, + 413.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 166.464, + 413.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XIV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 430.19171142578125, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 430.19171142578125, + 469.6309509277344 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 469.6309509277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.464, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 427.5547790527344, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 427.5547790527344, + 358.113037109375 + ], + [ + 166.464, + 358.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 429.3949890136719, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 429.3949890136719, + 250.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 250.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XVII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 432.4247741699219, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 432.4247741699219, + 249.35302734375 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 249.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XVIII - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5532531738281, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5532531738281, + 196.113037109375 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 196.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 449.1114501953125, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 449.1114501953125, + 139.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 139.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 447.25439453125, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 447.25439453125, + 193.85302734375 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 193.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 449.8873291015625, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 449.8873291015625, + 251.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 251.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.208, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 451.3614501953125, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 451.3614501953125, + 442.113037109375 + ], + [ + 143.208, + 442.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXIII - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 421.3848876953125, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 421.3848876953125, + 469.113037109375 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 469.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXIV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.208, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.1763916015625, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.1763916015625, + 140.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 143.208, + 140.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 448.79638671875, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 448.79638671875, + 620.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 620.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXVI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 450.2900390625, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 450.2900390625, + 496.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 496.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXVII - FRAUDULENT MISREP TATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsifyl", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.14800000000002, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 454.0372314453125, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 454.0372314453125, + 332.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 140.14800000000002, + 332.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXVIII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 456.29638671875, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 456.29638671875, + 223.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 223.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 452.9263916015625, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 452.9263916015625, + 331.113037109375 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 331.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXX - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.552, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 443.1600341796875, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 443.1600341796875, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 150.552, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 445.812744140625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 445.812744140625, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 448.023681640625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 448.023681640625, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXIII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 451.4100341796875, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 451.4100341796875, + 221.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 221.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXIV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Frank Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 506.46453857421875, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 506.46453857421875, + 439.85302734375 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 439.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.35199999999999, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 502.71453857421875, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 502.71453857421875, + 302.9830627441406 + ], + [ + 89.35199999999999, + 302.9830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT YOCXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Roseanne Caretsky) ,-..... .,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 506.12399999999997, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 506.12399999999997, + 223.113037109375 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 223.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 3OOCVII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 508.778076171875, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 508.778076171875, + 138.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 138.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VOCVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra ME)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.84400000000001, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 510.22381591796875, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 510.22381591796875, + 221.613037109375 + ], + [ + 83.84400000000001, + 221.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.3647155761719, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.3647155761719, + 140.613037109375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 140.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XL \u2014 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.68800000000002, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 423.96453857421875, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 423.96453857421875, + 620.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 167.68800000000002, + 620.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLI - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 428.09381103515625, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 428.09381103515625, + 439.85302734375 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 439.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 576.7199999999999 + ], + [ + 428.84381103515625, + 576.7199999999999 + ], + [ + 428.84381103515625, + 605.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 605.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLIII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.344, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 434.6290283203125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 434.6290283203125, + 358.113037109375 + ], + [ + 160.344, + 358.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLIV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.956, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 433.1747741699219, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 433.1747741699219, + 221.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 160.956, + 221.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 618.03 + ], + [ + 430.1747741699219, + 618.03 + ], + [ + 430.1747741699219, + 647.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 647.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.956, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 434.2626037597656, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 434.2626037597656, + 467.613037109375 + ], + [ + 160.956, + 467.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLVU - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 435.61688232421875, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 435.61688232421875, + 495.35302734375 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 495.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLVIII - AIDI D ABE \n(against Prove)\",", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.672, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 436.96799999999996, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 436.96799999999996, + 331.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 156.672, + 331.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLIX - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 384.267333984375, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 384.267333984375, + 139.85302734375 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 139.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT L- AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 442.75439453125, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 442.75439453125, + 619.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 619.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNT LI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 446.0116882324219, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 446.0116882324219, + 578.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 578.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.492, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 446.4814453125, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 446.4814453125, + 524.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 147.492, + 524.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LIII - AIDING,AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 449.8614501953125, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 449.8614501953125, + 469.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 469.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LIV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 604.26 + ], + [ + 448.3614501953125, + 604.26 + ], + [ + 448.3614501953125, + 633.3530120849609 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 633.3530120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNT LV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 445.3873291015625, + 548.3700000000001 + ], + [ + 445.3873291015625, + 577.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 577.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LVI - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.4010925292969, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.4010925292969, + 524.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 524.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LVII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.044, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 448.023681640625, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 448.023681640625, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 145.044, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LVIII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 450.6600341796875, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 450.6600341796875, + 620.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 620.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 446.5400390625, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 446.5400390625, + 496.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 496.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESE , 'ATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky) ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.552, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 444.64190673828125, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 444.64190673828125, + 333.3529968261719 + ], + [ + 150.552, + 333.3529968261719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 446.9263916015625, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 446.9263916015625, + 222.35302734375 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 222.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXII - NEGLIGENT MISFtEP TION \n(against Spinosa) ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 443.2284240722656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 443.2284240722656, + 332.613037109375 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 332.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXIII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.9100341796875, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.9100341796875, + 305.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 305.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXIV - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTAT \n(against Roseanne Carctsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.16400000000002, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 446.75999999999993, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 446.75999999999993, + 278.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 151.16400000000002, + 278.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXV - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATI \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 247.86 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 247.86 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 278.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 278.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 501.24468994140625, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 501.24468994140625, + 523.113037109375 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 523.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\" 14/\nCOUNT I,XVII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 377.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 503.84381103515625, + 377.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 503.84381103515625, + 414.35302734375 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 414.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.964, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 507.6147155761719, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 507.6147155761719, + 305.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 89.964, + 305.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY D \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.228, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.228, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXX - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra Villegas)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 498.6147155761719, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 498.6147155761719, + 332.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 332.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXI \u2014 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 434.11468505859375, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 434.11468505859375, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 435.22381591796875, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 435.22381591796875, + 620.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 620.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXIII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 438.02496337890625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 438.02496337890625, + 222.35302734375 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 222.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXIV -AIDING AND ABETITING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 439.5126037597656, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 439.5126037597656, + 647.6130218505859 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 647.6130218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXV - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 435.01092529296875, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 435.01092529296875, + 468.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 468.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXVI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 438.39501953125, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 438.39501953125, + 303.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 303.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXVII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Debra IME)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.83599999999998, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 441.0547790527344, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 441.0547790527344, + 304.1130676269531 + ], + [ + 154.83599999999998, + 304.1130676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT DOCVIII - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.79600000000002, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 391.75439453125, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 391.75439453125, + 139.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 203.79600000000002, + 139.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 589.6800000000001 + ], + [ + 457.00439453125, + 589.6800000000001 + ], + [ + 457.00439453125, + 619.1130218505859 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 619.1130218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T LXXX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 454.7265319824219, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 454.7265319824219, + 578.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 578.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LVOCI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 493.29 + ], + [ + 456.60650634765625, + 493.29 + ], + [ + 456.60650634765625, + 523.85302734375 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 523.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXII - AIDING AND A(INNG CONVERSION \n(against TD N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 459.6373291015625, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 459.6373291015625, + 386.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 386.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXIII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 520.02 + ], + [ + 461.5044250488281, + 520.02 + ], + [ + 461.5044250488281, + 550.1130218505859 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 550.1130218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXIV - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against TD Bank N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 428.9010925292969, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 428.9010925292969, + 521.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 521.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXV - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.31199999999998, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 458.1600341796875, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 458.1600341796875, + 141.35302734375 + ], + [ + 138.31199999999998, + 141.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXVI - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 460.0400390625, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 460.0400390625, + 620.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 620.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXVII - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 462.273681640625, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 462.273681640625, + 496.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 496.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXV1II - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 463.4036865234375, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 463.4036865234375, + 495.35302734375 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 495.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXVIX - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.968, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 464.523681640625, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 464.523681640625, + 331.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 331.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XC - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.83599999999998, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 439.7900390625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 439.7900390625, + 222.35302734375 + ], + [ + 154.83599999999998, + 222.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCI - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 441.7117919921875, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 441.7117919921875, + 214.113037109375 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 214.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCII - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENATION \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 445.6199035644531, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 445.6199035644531, + 331.85302734375 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 331.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCIII - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 502.72381591796875, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 502.72381591796875, + 303.7330627441406 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 303.7330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCIV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against ID Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.99468994140625, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.99468994140625, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCV - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.69600000000001, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 501.24468994140625, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 501.24468994140625, + 221.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 96.69600000000001, + 221.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCVI - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.34381103515625, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.34381103515625, + 140.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 140.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCVII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.56799999999998, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 433.72381591796875, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 433.72381591796875, + 619.8530120849609 + ], + [ + 161.56799999999998, + 619.8530120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCVIII - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 435.96453857421875, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 435.96453857421875, + 440.613037109375 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 440.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCIX - AIDING ANICA:1TTING FRAUD \n(against Frank Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.956, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 434.3047790527344, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 434.3047790527344, + 386.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 160.956, + 386.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT C - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 423.02496337890625, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 423.02496337890625, + 223.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 223.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CI - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 426.0126037597656, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 426.0126037597656, + 140.613037109375 + ], + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 140.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CII - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Debra M)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.464, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 427.892578125, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 427.892578125, + 565.1130218505859 + ], + [ + 166.464, + 565.1130218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CIII - AIDING AND ABE1TING FRAUD \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 430.14501953125, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 430.14501953125, + 414.35302734375 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 414.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CI V - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 380.7474365234375, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 380.7474365234375, + 304.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 304.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CV - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 448.0302734375, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 448.0302734375, + 223.113037109375 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 223.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CVI - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against TO Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 449.8743896484375, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 449.8743896484375, + 223.113037109375 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 223.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CVII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.3743896484375, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.3743896484375, + 305.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 305.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CVIII - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra la", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.14800000000002, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 453.6243896484375, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 453.6243896484375, + 250.113037109375 + ], + [ + 140.14800000000002, + 250.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(against Andrew Barnett) \nCOUNT CIX - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 449.50439453125, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 449.50439453125, + 222.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 222.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CX - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against TB Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.3766784667969, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.3766784667969, + 222.35302734375 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 222.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXI - CIVIL CONSPI \n(against Scott Rothstein,'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.9, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 395.96400000000006, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 395.96400000000006, + 332.613037109375 + ], + [ + 198.9, + 332.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 399.7318115234375, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 399.7318115234375, + 523.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 523.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXIII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.39200000000002, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 401.601806640625, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 401.601806640625, + 224.613037109375 + ], + [ + 193.39200000000002, + 224.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXIV - CIVIL CO RACY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.39200000000002, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 401.1841125488281, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 401.1841125488281, + 388.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 193.39200000000002, + 388.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXV - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 398.9818115234375, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 398.9818115234375, + 580.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 580.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXVI - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 403.0953369140625, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 403.0953369140625, + 141.35302734375 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 141.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXVII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Debra Villegas)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 404.601806640625, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 404.601806640625, + 333.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 333.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXVIII - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.108, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 405.7318115234375, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 405.7318115234375, + 524.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 189.108, + 524.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXIX - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 403.126220703125, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 403.126220703125, + 142.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 142.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.48399999999998, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 379.1053466796875, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 379.1053466796875, + 302.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 218.48399999999998, + 302.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 68.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 398.73345947265625, + 68.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 398.73345947265625, + 95.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 95.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "+ AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.13999938964844, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 492.85797119140625, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 492.85797119140625, + 601.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 103.13999938964844, + 601.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 70.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 385.8750915527344, + 70.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 385.8750915527344, + 84.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 84.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. B \na \nnk Accounts (\"BA\"), hereinafter collectively referred to as \"the defendant bank \nounts:\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 540.383056640625, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 540.383056640625, + 111.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 111.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Bhsiness Interests (\"BI\"), hereinafter collectively referred to as \"the defendant \nbusiness interests:\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 540.730712890625, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 540.730712890625, + 536.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 536.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.7242736816406, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.7242736816406, + 83.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 83.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRST CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 981(a)(1)(C) and 1343", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 404.6581115722656, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 404.6581115722656, + 154.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 154.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 981(a)(1)(A) and 1957", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 411.4322509765625, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 411.4322509765625, + 239.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 239.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIRD CLAIM FOR FORFEITURE \n18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 981(a)(1)(A) and 1956", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 405.7816162109375, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 405.7816162109375, + 550.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 550.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.43621826171875, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.43621826171875, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.5533142089844, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.5533142089844, + 131.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 131.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scott Rothstein 'You're in a town full of \nthieves'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.676, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 508.6953430175781, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 508.6953430175781, + 146.6229248046875 + ], + [ + 44.676, + 146.6229248046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 503.45587158203125, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 503.45587158203125, + 107.282958984375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 107.282958984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "elle ainLIerala", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 203.5625 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 203.5625 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 238.78125 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 238.78125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Body", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.63199999999999, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 92.98515319824219, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 92.98515319824219, + 406.532958984375 + ], + [ + 52.63199999999999, + 406.532958984375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761748" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/_page_7_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/_page_7_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f0de29170404c8c8901300ba6c13ba4321c749d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761748/_page_7_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fe282f5473711b9c2b4dc286d75ca3591c06ce599b370047c323e4b341b5bb3d +size 16993 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b46dbd8c48bb8ed6e1152b2fee37207fcca72ce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.md @@ -0,0 +1,5825 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 4 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motio : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP.21** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA + +RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST, D&L PARTNERS, LP, DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST, ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST and KRETSCHMAR, + +Plaintiffs, + +v. + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, DAVID BODEN, DEBRA , ANDREW BARNETTIRENE STAY TD BANK, N.A., SPINOSA, JENNIFER KERSTETTER, ROSANNE CARETSKY, BANYON IN I ME FUND L P BANYON USVI L C LEVIN SZAFRANSKI CONSULTANTS CORPORA BERENFELD SPRT1LbR SHEER. LLP, PRE MI ONYX O + +Defendants. + +CASE NO.: 09-062943 (19) + +#### AMENDED COMPLAINT + +Plaintiffs, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC; D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LW; BFMC INVESTMENT, LW; LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR (collectively referred to herein as "Plaintiffs") hereby sue the Defendants, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN; DAVID BODEN; DEBRA + +ANDREW BARNETT; IRENE STAY: TD BANK, N.A.; SPINOSA; JENNIFER + +ICERSTETTER; ROSANNE CARETSKY; BANYON INCOME FUND. L.P.; BANYON USVI, + +LLC: G. LEVIN. PREVE: MICHAEL SZAPRANSKI: ONYX OPTIONS + +CONSULTANTS CORPORATION; and BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER. LLP + +(collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), and allege as follows: + +#### Plaintiffs' Claims + +- 1. The Plaintiffs sue the Defendants and seek the followho : + - a. Compensatory damages in excess, of \$100,000,000.00, pit-judgment interest, and other amounts to/ be particularized at trial as a direct and proximate result of Defe ssion of the following: + - i. cone + - ii. fraodule \*srepresentation; negligent misrepresentation; + - iv. negligent supervision; + - v. breach of fiduciary duty; +- vi. civil conspiracy; and +0 vii. aiding and abetting fraud, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty; + - b. punitive damages upon obtaining leave of court; + - c. taxable costs and attorney's fees; and + +- d. any such further relief this court deems equitable—and—just under the circumstances. + +#### Overview + +2. This action arises out of a fraudulent scheme orchestrated by Scott W. Rothstein, who bilked investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars. Mr. Rothstein, through. Aeirts of his law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. (collectively referred to here' 1Z,, "Principal Conspirators" and more fully described, infra), devised an elaborat plan assign putative plaintiffs' confidential settlements with structured payments w pvesTors at a lump sum discounted rate. In reality, while some of the cases used to estor funding were real, all of the confidential settlements were purely fabricat returns to earlier investors were not made via structured payments, but instead with the principal obtained from later investors--a classic Ponzi scheme.' + +3. However, the Princic yo orators did not act alone. Defendant, TD BANK, N.A. (hereinafter, "TD Bank") a subst ary of Toronto Dominion Bank, was complicit in this I scheme, serving as a critical lynchpin "legitimizing" the Principal Conspirators' plot and facilitating crucial inducements to investor action. Specifically, investors were duped by TD Bank employees conspiring with the Principal Conspirators to manipulate TD Bank's trust account I statements and deceiving investors with false senses of security predicated on written assurances that settlement funds existed and would only be released directly to them. It is these bank + +A Ponzi scheme is generally recognized as a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to separate investors from their own money or from monies paid by subsequent investors, rather than from any actual profit earned. The scheme is named after Charles Ponzi who became notorious for using the technique in early 1920. + +declarations, tantamount to a guaranty, which gravely impacted investor risk-evaluation analysis and unduly influenced investors to close their deals. + +4. Moreover, demonstrative of TD Bank's participation or alternatively, evidence of their gross negligence and wanton disregard, is the bank's reckless disregard of numerous "red flags." Irrefutably, TD Bank knew that Rothstein Rosendfeldt Adler, P.A. (here er, "RRA") was moving hundreds of millions of dollars through its TD Bank trust accoun in October 2009 alone, almost a half of a billion dollars moved in and out of RRA's rt Lattderdale based trust accounts--more money than most bank branches would likely decade. Yet, despite the massive amount of funds being moved by one client, B never sought independent verification of the source of monies, choosing instead to \int itily by. The Ponzi scheme simply could not have gained traction without TD B willfully failing to authenticate the origin doors. ivement in sanctioning or, otherwise, ous amounts of money coming through its + +5. Unfortunately, thbetnotc r + +18. TD Bank is a national banking association registered to do business in Florida. TD Bank maintains, substantial contact with Florida through its multiple branches throughout the st TD Bank was the financial epicenter of the Ponzi scheme. Among other things, Oco ank nspircd, induced, and facilitated the Principal Conspirators' deceptive practi g Principal Conspirators to divert hundreds of millions of investor dollars through TD Bank accounts. + +19. SPINOSA (hereinafter, "Spinosa"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was a senior vice-president of operations for TD Bank. Spinosa participated in the scheme by, among other things, meeting with investors, verifying + +account statements and providing investors with purported irrevocable "lock letters" securing investor funds. + +20. JENNIFER KERS 1 1ER (hereinafter, "Kerstetter"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was an assistant manager for TD Bank. Kerstetter participated in the scheme by, among other things, meeting with investors, verifying account statements, and providing investors with purported irrevocable "1 securing investor funds. + +21. ROSEANNE CARETSKY (hereinafter, "CaretslcylNis a individual residing in Broward County, Florida, and, at all times relevant hereto, was an assistant vice president and branch manager for TD Bank. Caretslcy participated i the scheme by, among other things, meeting with investors, verifying account statements, "lock letters" securing investor funds. g investors with purported irrevocable + +#### RRA Defendants + +22. DAVID BODE (hereinafter, 'Roden"), is an individual residing in Fort Lauderdale, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was a partner and general counsel for RRA. Boden was Rothstein's "right-hand man" and an essential participant in the scheme by, among other things, recruiting and soliciting investors and drafting documents to induce investors into funding the settlement while having actual and/or constructive knowledge that the investments were part of a Ponzi scheme. + +23. DEBRA E. (hereinafter, 'M'), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was the chief operating officer at RRA. Rothstein's number two at RRA, participated in the scheme by, among other things, furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors for the purpose of inducing investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +24. ANDREW BARNETT (hereinafter, "Barnett"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was the Director of Corporate Developntent for RRA. Barnett, participated in the scheme by, among other things, recruiting, soliciting and inducing investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +25. IRENE STAY (hereinafter, "Star), is an individuaLtisiding in Broward County. Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was the chief financial officer of RRA. Stay participated in the scheme by furnishing investors with fals ed bank account statements and wire transfer confirmations used to induce investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi schen + +#### Banyon Defendants + +26. G. LEVIN (hereinafter, "Levin"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and—at all times relevant hereto. was the chief executive officer of Banyon USVI, LLC and Banyon Income Fund. Levin who pieviously owned and operated GGL Industries. Inc. d/b/a CLITesleMotor Carriages, a company convicted of federal fraud charges. actively Participated in the scheme by. among other things, recruiting, inducing and securing investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +27. J. PREVE (hereinafter, "Preve"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was the chief operating officer or agent of Banyon + +USVI, LLC and Banyon Income Fund who maintained an office at RRA. Prove, a convicted bank fraud and embezzlement felon2 participated in the scheme by, among other things, recruiting, I induchut and securing investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +28. BANYON INCOME FUND, L.P. (hereinafter. "BI14"). is a Dyl~vatebtroted partnership which Levin and Preve operated as a Putative investment entity the Ponzi scheme settlements with investor funds. + +29. \$ANYON USVL LLC (hereinafter, "Banyon USV lo. a I3eTaware limited liability company which Levin and Preve operated as a putative i ntity to purchase the Ponzi scheme settlements with investor funds, + +#### Onyx Defendants + +30. MICHAEL SZAFRAN Z KI (hereinafter, "Szafranski"), is an individual residing in Miami-Dade County, Florida andoat times relevant hereto, was the president of Onyx Options Consultants Corporation and who maintained an office inside RRA. Szafranski was hired as an "independent" third-partv f of BE Banyon USVL Razorbactand D3 tasked with verifying critical aspects authorized finan purported investment deals, Specifically, Szafranski was the only person unredacted settlement documents, to confirm the Principal Conspirators' TD Bank and to offer an opinion as to the authenticity of the settlement deals. Szafranski participated in the scheme by. among other things, making material misrepresentations, + +2Preve plead guilty to bank embezzlement charges in 1985 and received ten (10) years probation and a \$10,000.00 fine for falsifying loan documents in connection with a scheme that resulted in losses exceeding \$2,300,000.00. + +false verifications and actively inducing investor funding despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +31. ONYX OPTIONS CONSULTANTS CORPORATION d/b/a/ ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (hereinafter, "Onyx"). is a Florida limited liability company which Szafranski owns and operates as a third-party verifier and putative investment entity employedlo-facilifite and induce investor funding into the Ponzi scheme. + +#### CPA Defendant + +32. BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECH'I'ER SHEER PA'S LIP (hereinafter, "Berenfeld"), is a Florida limited liability partnership who, at atigies relevant hereto, served as the auditing firm for BIF and Bannon USVI and as the accounting finn for RRA. Berenfeld participated in the scheme by. among other things conspiring, inducing, and facilitating the Principal Conspirators' deceptive pree n. providing audited financial statements which pumorted to authenticate hund ts, ns of dollars of false receivables, allowing Principal Conspirators to perpetrate a frauSk. ,...) + +#### The Ponzi Scheme + +#### The Rothstein Facade + +33. From humble beginnings in 2003, Rothstein built RRA into one of the fastest growing Florida-based law firms. Under Rothstein's stewardship, RRA grew from seven attorneys to over seventy and amassed over two hundred and fifty in staff. g sv,ith its n i m dramatic growth in size, RRA rapidly emerged as a legal, politicaO ituithropic powerhouse. + +more than sixteen real estate properties, twenty-five cars, interests in a myriad of businesses ranging from w Rothstein's assets seized by the federal gov hereto as Exhibit "A-1." 34. Not surprisingly, Rothstein amassed an enormo to of assets including en foot yacht, and various aurants to vodka. See a list of with estimates of their value attached + +35. Rothstein lived lain nt prolifically--critical components necessary to set his scheme in motion. + +36. With t RRi tivfireless marketing efforts and meteoric rise into prominence, Rothstein quickly made f ys into preeminent social circles, rubbing elbows with high networth individuals and political luminaries, the perfect breeding grounds to lure wealthy investors. His plot was up and running. + +#### The Plan + +37. Rothstein seized upon his new found stature to entice investors into what would eventually become a Ponzi scheme using his budding employment and labor practice at RRA as his conduit. + +38. The scheme was predicated on the Principal Conspirators self-professed pipeline of pre-suit, confidential settlement agreements as the "preeminent sexual harassment and labor employment law firm in the country." Investors were told that the Principal Conspirators had an extensive in-house private investigative team, including former F.B.I. and C.I.A. agents, whose singular task was to obtain compromising evidence against high-profile putative defendants. Rothstein's story was that the evidence and surveillance acquired, often supporting civil causes of action ranging from sexual harassment to mass tort cover-ups tow stlaittnrer claims, was presented to the putative defendant who was then offered an opportunity o avoid litigation and the negative publicity associated therewith by agreeing to resolve the matter voluntarily by and through a confidential settlement with the putative plaintiff. + +39. Once the putative defendant agreed, the confidential settlement always included two main ingredients: (1) that structured-payments to a putative plaintiff be made over time, generally a three to nine month tinviperiod; and (2) that the putative defendant would fund the entire settlement up front to be held in RRA's TD Bank trust account and disbursed to the putative plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the confidential settlement agreement. + +#### The Pitch + +40 Ro t informed investors that the putative plaintiffs did not want to wait for the onthly payouts and would agree to assign their rights to the structured payout for a lump-sum payment typically at a discount in the range of 20-40% of the settlements' facevalue. \_Rothstein always had a plethora of plausible explanations as to why a putative plaintiff wanted their money now and simply could not wait for the structured monthly payments. + +41. Rothstein claimed to want nothing from the deal and was only presenting the "opportunity" fora putative plaintiffs benefit and to facilitate recovery of RRA's contingent fee. Notwithstanding, Rothstein would often boast that if not for his professional and legal conflicts he would be the one purchasing these assignments. + +42. As a means to induce investor action, Rothstein would show investors the purported settlement agreement in an attempt to substantiate the deal; however, because the settlements were pre-suit and confidential, the names of the putative plaintiffs and putative defendants were redacted. + +43. Additionally, the Principal Conspirators would provide: (1) confirmation of RRA's trust account balance at TD Bank evidencing the putative defendants fully funded settlement proceeds; (2) a "lock letter", drafted and executed by a TD Bank executive, irrevocably confirming that the respective settlement proceeds in RRA's trust account could only be paid directly to the investor's designated account which, in most cases, was an account at TD Bank; and (3) opportunities for an independent third-party verifier to authenticate the underlying settlement, assignment and funding of settlement proceeds. + +44. Notably, Rothstein was hyper-vigilant regarding irregs to RRA accounts under the guise of confidentiality. In fact, potential investors could only access 11) Bank account informatzon inane of two ways. Either Rothstein would invite the investor to his office to view the online balance provided by himself or Stay3 or, he would "authorize" TD Bank to provide copies of account statements and wire transfers prepared and delivered by TD Bank executives + +3 See Exhibit "W" infra, which is an October 6, 2009 on-line semen shot of RRA's TD Bank accounts accessed (logged in) by Irene Shannon which is Irene Stay's maiden name. ("Welcome. Irene Shannon! You last logged in on Tuesday. October 06.2009 4:37 PM.") + +Spinosa, Kerstetter and Caretsky. On numerous occasions, TD Bank vice-president Spinosa, assistant manager Kerstetter, and assistant vice president Caretsky, physically handed the trust account statement to Rothstein in the immediate presence of an investor. + +45. As the final piece to persuade an investment, Rothstein would offer to rsonally guaranty the transaction. This personal guaranty, secured by the significant asse used, supra), was a vital component which tacitly lent credibility and security to t on. + +46. Once an investor was interested, the Principal Conspi ors, 0i njunction with Boden, drafted an agreement for the assignment of the settlement agreement and proceeds. + +trust account the lump sum payment for immedi Thereafter, RRA was obligated to make pa RRA's trust account at TD Bank directly strict accordance with the terms of the pw ted settlement agreement. 47. Upon execution of the assignment, the ' d wire transfer to RRA's ment to the putative plaintiff. funds previously verified and held in tor's lock letter trust account at TD Bank in + +#### Ponzi Scheme In Action + +#### Fabricated Settlements Premised on Real Cases + +48. In certain instances, the purported settlements, albeit fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by RRA. For example, one of the settlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous billionaire financier. In fact. RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil 2 ., case styled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Esptein, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered "the opportunity" to inve a p -suit \$30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set 'o operative facts as the Jane Doe case, but involving a different underage female pl • ls," e-mail dated October 6, 2009 referencing Epstein which is attached hereto an to herein as Exhibit "B." To augment his concocted story Rothstein invited D ce to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case files in Jane Doe in emonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the eviden Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard Epstein's private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 copies of a flight log purportedlreirtaining names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered \$200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein did not yet know about. + +Further, Preve was present for this meeting, despite the fact that he was not involved as an investor or representative in the D3 deal. + +49. Additionally, Rothstein used RRA's representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation but which was potentially beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. Por instance, RRA relentlessly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age women were on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein's lies. + +50. Conspicuously, and contrary to Banvon's allegations4 , Preve and Szafranski shared an office at RRA one floor down from Rothstele providing them access to Rothstein to assist in the furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. This fact helps explain why Preve attended the aforementioned D3 meeting despite)ns lack of involvement as an investor or representative. + +\/ 51. Another actual case which Rothstein attempted to use as a false predicate for his scheme was a mass tort cast against Chiquita Brands International. In this instance, Rothstein claimed to be representingpplaintiffs in 450 wrongful death cases on the verge of settling for 52,000,000.00 each. Rothstein told investors to begin raising funds in order to purchase this settlement \Vey e-tnail dated October 14, 2009 referencing Chiquita which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." While the cases against Chiquita are real, Rothstein did not represent any of the plaintiffs and the cases remain pending. + +4 In a November 23. 2009. "Confidential Update From Bannon". Levin erroneously alleges that "The allegation that Mr. Preve had an office at the Rothstein law firm. or that he may have helped the Rothstein firm to mislead potential investors is a total lie. Period." + +#### Plaintiffs' Investments: + +#### I. Banyon Income Fund + +52. BIF was formed in May 2009, and served as an original feeder fund for the Principal Conspirators settlement deals. + +53. According to the offering materials provided by Levin and Preve, BFI's stated investment goal was to purchase: + +> discount settlements and related periodic revenue stream from individual plaintiffs who have settled their labor and employment related lawsuits or claims, and who would otherwise receive their settlement amounts over a period of time. The purchased settlements arc secured by the full settlement amounts which will have been deposited in a trust account established by the plaintiff's attorney for the benefit of the plaintiff prior to purchase by Banyon Income Fund, LP. These sett ts ore released to Banyon Income Fund, LP o liquidate the purchased settlement. + +See Confidential Offering Memoran 2 1.11.1 April 30, 2009, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Comp/mite bit "D." + +54. Not coincidentally, BIF's investment strategy is identical to the purported investment vehicle offered by the Principal Conspirators at the center of the Ponzi scheme. + +55. In fact, the Confidential Offering Memorandum avers that "folnee a structure of formal doctupentation was put in place and a relationship established with Rothstein, the General Partner w able to achieve a large ramp up in business volume . . fwhichl have stabilized at approximately \$60,000,000 - \$75,000,000 in funded business per month," and that the Iftundin for these activities has come from credit facilities with institutional hedge fund lenders as well as the personal capital of Mr. Levin." Id. + +#### Amended Complaint + +56. Significantly, Banyon's Confidential Offering Memorandum relies heavily upon an audited financial statement prepared by Berenfeld which purportedly details Banvon's staggering growth and astounding returns verifying inter alit, that: + +- a. Levin, by and through Banvon affiliated companies, was doing as much as \$75,000,000.00 in business a month with Rothstein; +- b. Through March 2009. Banvon affiliated companies over \$1.1 billion dollars worth of legal settlements fromlto for a cost of \$657.000,000.00; +- c. By the end of March 2009, the Ba n affiliated companies had realized over \$531,000,000.00 million ' tit" d +- d. Banyan affiliated comp listed receivables in excess of \$559,000,000.00 ± fr pending settlements investments. + +oee id + +57. B1F's ConfidentitOffe 'Ci 14/fig Memorandum provided investors a window into the Principal Conspirators' house of cards, as the hedge fund was iust one of the investment consortiums feeding the Poozi scheme's voracious appetite. + +58. onPsubstantially all of BW's assets were funneled into the Principal me which served as rocket fuel blasting the obscure investment vehicle to + +59. In the spring of 2009, Barry Bekkedam from Ballamor Capital Management, LLC (hereinafter, "Ballamor")6 and promoter of BIF, met Doug Von Allmen (D&L Partners) to discuss D&L Partners' participation in BIF. + +60. During that discussion, Mr. Von Allmen learned that BM was started by Levin, a professed mentor and confidant of Rothstein, and that the settlements BIF was purchasing were through an exclusive arrangement negotiated between Rothstein and Levin ranbehalf of BIF. + +61. Mr. Von Allmen was told by Mr. Bekkedam that Levi onally worth in excess of \$400,000,000.00 and would personally guarantee the sottla ents. + +62. Additionally, Mr. Bekkedam told Mr. V 1 that the settlements were N , I already fully-funded in the attorneys' trust accoun t 'th "Sis,a "Big Four "6 auditing firm would verify them quarterly, and that Ballamor had ( S • u unfettered access to the trust account balances and would oversee Banvon's h• ' cao independent verifier to monitor and confirm the settlement transaction. + +63. Finally, Mr. Vc'sAllmen was told by Mr. Bekkedam that it would take two signatures to move the money, one of which would be someone from BIF. + +64. In reliance tin these purported security and verification procedures, on or about May 4. 2009. Mr. Von Allmen (through D&L Partners) and his wife Linda Von Allmen (through Dynasty Trust) first wired BM funds; approximately one month later, his son and daughter-in-law David and Ann Von Allmen (thm\* the DVA Trust and AVA Trust) and his step-son, + +5 Ballamor Capital Management, LLC is an S.E.C. registered investment advisor specializing in managing investments on behalf of high and ultra-high net worth individuals + +6 As it turns out, the "Big Four" accounting firm referenced was Berenfeld, + +Kretschmar (collectively referred to herein as "Banyan Investors") also funded investments as directed by Ballamor and Mr. Bekkedam. + +65. Prior to investing, each Banyon Investor received a "the aforementioned Confidential Offering Memorandum describing the terms and conditions of the investment structure in greater detail. See Composite Exhibit "D." + +66. Significantly, the Confidential Offering Memorandum provided that a receipt of the putative defendant's wire transfer of the full settlement proceeds into RRA's mist account would be verified by an independent third party (see Szafransici. infra). Id. + +67. Additionally, the Banyon Investors were ass th cooperation with TD Bank executives (which turned out to be Spinosa, Kerstetter and), that BIF's third-party verifier would have online access to banking records for tacitsit account and admission into all records "trilk\ r related to the purchased settlements and settkmenttust accounts. Id. it + +68. Furthermore, the M: .rant(pm states that while "Ballamor will receive no compensation for its particire estment recommendation . . . Levin has an agreement in principle Ballamor and its principal, Barry R. Bekkedam, with respect to an equity investment in Ballamor by Mr. Levin and a loan to Mr. Bekkedam, the final terms of which have not been determined:'? Id, + +69. Safranslci, president of Onyx Capital Management, acted as an the designated independent, third-party verifier for the Banyon Investors and BIF. Prior to and during the course of + +.7 In fact we now know that Ballamor and Mr. Bekkedam received \$5.000.000.00 from Levin for their involvement in this Ponzi scheme along with a \$18.000.000.00 investment through Ballamor into Nova Bank, a Pennsylvania banka + +his investigation, Szafranski obtained the following information demonstrative of TD Bank's involvement: + +a. October 29, 2008 letter signed by Caretsky, assistant branch manager with Commerce Banks enclosing three trust account statements for RRA: (1) account' number ..ii containing \$166,922,339.00; (2) account number e ning S40,125,685.44; and (3) account number containing \$348,229,480) 1 three trust account statements for RRA are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit 46E? + +b. March 20, 2009 letter signed by Kersteft-eya tstant manager for 'ID Bank enclosing three trust account statement for RRA: (1) account number showing a balance of \$104,211,711.22; (2) account number showing a balance of \$368,333,133.20; and (3) account numbers showing a balance of \$110,331,563.13. All three account statements referenced'are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "F." + +c. April 17, 2009 letter signed by Caretsky as a TD Bank Assistant Vice President, enclosing RRA trust account statement for: (1) account number showing a balance of \$61,117,111; (2) RRA trust account statement for account number showing a balance of \$80,978,935.31; (3) RRA trust account statement for account number showing a balance of \$136,122,322.87; (4) RRA trust account statement for account number showing a balance of \$198,644,311.13; and (5) RRA trust account statement for account number showing a balance of \$483,668,999.39. All five trust account + +\$ Commerce Bank was a predecessor in interest to TD Bank as a result of TI)-BefliE194-7-billien-purehase ef-Gernmeree-Bank-iti-March 2008 purchase. + +statements referenced are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "G." + +d. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$1,957,500.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "H"; + +e. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$2,680,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlemen y of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "I"; + +f. June 22, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer Trtrst account ending xin the amount of \$695,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "J"; + +g. June 30, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$2,208,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement , a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "K"; + +h. July 1, 2009 Commerce Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending xin the amount of \$6,072,000.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement , a copy of which is attached hereto an ( 4S corporated fi herein as Exhibit "L"; + +ly 13, 2009 letter signed by Kerstetter from TD Bank enclosing RRA trust account stibi nt for account number showing a balance of \$14,286,000.00, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "NI"; and + +j. July 17, 2009 TD Bank wire transfer to RRA trust account ending x-= in the amount of \$22,348,221.00 and purporting to be a funded settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "N"; + +70. In reliance on the foregoing, as confirmed by Szafranski, the Banyon Investors collectively invested \$60,5 ,000.00 into BIF and into the Ponzi scheme. + +#### 2. Razorback Funding, LW + +71. Razorback was formed September 24, 2009 for purposes of investing in two RRA settlements: (1) a \$40,600,000.00 structured settlement, payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$23,200,000.00; and (2) a \$26,100,000.00 structured settlement, payable in three equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payment of \$17,400,000.00. See Confidential Settlement Agreements and Releases which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "O." + +72. In particular, the deal was structured so Razorback would fund \$32,000,000.00 towards the purchase of these settlements by means of a loan to Banyon USVI, LLC. Banyon USVI in turn would contribute S8,600,000.00 to purchase the settlement proceeds from the Principal Conspirators. See Aclmowlecigentent of Assignment/Purchase of Settlement Proceeds and Sale and Transfer Agreements which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "P." + +73. On or about September 18, 2009, as part of its due diligence, Razorback obtained a copy of a Tp Bank "lock letter" signed by Spinosa used in a prior deal. See September 18, 2009 lock letter from TD Bank which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "Q." The lock letter'indicates that TD Bank had been irrevocably instructed to pay the fund identified in a particular KKA trust account only to the investor's bank account. + +74. On October 1, 2009, Szafranski, who was utilized as the independent reviewer for Razorback as well, met with Rothstein to review and verify all of the documents supporting the + +Razorback deal. In that meeting, Szafranski purportedly witnessed Rothstein sign on to the TD Bank on-line banking website and verified that all of the wire transfers for the underlying Razorback settlement deals had been received by RRA and were held in RBA's trust account ending in x-=. A copy of the October 1, 2009 email front Szafransld verifying the abovereferenced account is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "R." + +75. Szafranski also verified that a "lock letter" had been received by Spinosa as Regional Vice President of TD Bank dated October 1, 2009 stating the following: + +> Pursuant to your written instructions to us of September 30, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed to Banyon USVI (Del), LLV, eto Razorback Funding, LLC, Debt & Equity Re-Payment Account: TD Bank, NA, 319 Glen Head Road, Old Brookville, NY, ABA: Account # . Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but, rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the Banyon USW account. + +See October 1, 2009 letter which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "S." + +76. Spinosa e-mailed the "lock letter" to Rothstein earlier that day with a message stating that at Rothsteln's "request and instructions, this account [RBA's trust account] has been irrevocably locked as to destination of all disbursements [which was Razorback's account, also at TD Bank], The letter confirming same is attached. Please do not deposit any funds into this account that are not soley (sic) to be directed to the entity set forth in the irrevocable instruction." A copy of the October 1, 2009 email front Spinosa is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 9 .." + +77. Also on October 1, 2009, Razorback received copies of two wire transfers from Preve, a Banyon USVI representative, demonstrating that a total of \$66,700,000.00 (the full settlement funding being purchased) had been received by RRA in its trust account with TD Bank. A copy of the October 1, 2009 wire transfers is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "U." + +78. On the same day, Preve forwarded Razorback an email from Rothstein providing: (1) confirmation of Preve's purported \$8,000,000.00 wire into RRA's t account and (2) that no disbursement on the deal would be made until he Razorback. A copy of the October I, 2009 email incorporated herein as Exhibit "V." res: ' - the \$32,000,000.00 from o tein is attached hereto and + +79. On October 3, 2009, Razorback the lock letter. The Razorback representative contact Spinosa to verify the details of unable to reach Spinosa but did receive confirmation from Spinosa's assistant that she prepared the lock letter and that Spinosa signed it. + +80. On October 7, 2009, Razorback received an email from Preve which contained an on-line screen shot of an RRA trust account at TD Bank indicating a balance of \$66,700,000.00. A copy of the TD Bank account screen shot is attached hereto as Exhibit "W." + +81. Finally, on October 22, 2009, Szafranski met again with Rothstein and verified that all of the putative plaintiffs in the Razorback deals received their disbursements by reviewing TD Bank's on-line banking website. A copy of Szafranski October 22, 2009 confirming email is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "X." + +82. In reliance on the foregoing, Razorback transferred the sum of \$32,000,000.00 to RRA's trust account. + +I. + +#### 3. D3 Capital Club, LLC + +83. D3 was formed October 4, 2009 for purposes of investing in a \$30,000,000.00 RRA structured settlement, payable in six equal monthly installments of \$5,000,000.00, offered in exchange for \$18,000,000.00. See Confidential Settlement Agreements and Releases which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "Y." + +84. A D3 representative, who was also a representative of RatoTGa k s1penagement team, had knowledge of and relied upon the contacts and representations made by TD Bank in connection with the Razorback transaction. + +85. On or about October 15, 2009, as part of its e iligence, D3 obtained a copy of a TD Bank "lock letter" signed by Spinosa stating the fo • + +> Pursuant to your written instrucho'to of October 14, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed to D3 Capital Club, LLC, 2833NE 35th Court, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33308, TD Bank NA, Account # + +See Octo lock letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "Z." + +Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the I'D bank account # IMIrIMI belonging to D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +On October 15, 2009, Spinosa signed another letter enclosing a copy of RRA's trust account bank statement showing abalance in excess of \$30,000,000.00. See October 15, 2009 letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "AA." + +87. Furthermore, on October 15, 2009, Kerstetter drafted aletter to RRA enclosing a copy of RRA's trust account bank statement for the D3 settlement showing abalance in excess of \$30,000,000.00. This letter was personally delivered by Kerstetter to Rothstein in a D3 representative's presence while inside the TD Bank Fort Lauderdale branch. See October 15, 2009 letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "AA-1." Later that day, Kerstetter met again with that same D3 representative at a location outside of the bank in order to sign the paperwork to open a D3 account at TD Bank. ' I se + +88. On October 16, 2009 and again on October 19, 2009, a D3 rep 7-14/ to Spinosa and Kerstetter advising that 1)3 had opened its account for ptuposes 7 doing business with RRA and asked about the mechanics of the irrevocable lockl'tter that D3 had with RRA account number A copy of the October 16, 2009 and October 19, 2009 emails are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "BB." nt emails + +89. Spinosa responded to the October 19, 2009 email with a phone call to the D3 representative. During the conversation, the lock letter was acknowledged by Spinosa who refusedto provide any further details about the Principal Conspirators' accounts. + +90. Finally, on October 19, 2009, Szafranslci met with Rothstein and verified that the sum of \$30,000,000.00 was wired from the putative defendant into the RRA trust account ending x- =. A copy of October 19, 2009 email is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "CC? + +1. liance on the foregoing, D3 transferred the sum of \$13,500,000.00 to RRA's trustace + +#### Amended Complaint + +#### 4. BFMC Investment, LLC + +92. BFMC was formed in November 1998 to fund investment opportunities. + +93. On September 28 2009, BFMC principal, Barry Florescue ("Florescue") met socially with Andrew Barnett ("Barnett"), Director of Corporate Development for RRA. + +94. During this meeting, Barnett described his role at RRA and invited Florescue to meet Rothstein later that week to discuss a lucrative investment opportunity. Florescue was aware of Rothstein given Rothstein's prominence in the Fort Lauderdale business and social community, and a meeting was scheduled at RRA on September 30, 2009. + +95. Florescue and his employee, Mark Seigel ("Seigel"), arrived in RRA's offices and were initially introduced to Boden. Coincidentally, Boden had, many years earlier, worked as a junior staff member with Florescue's corporate counsel and had actively worked on one of Florescue's previous financing transactions. + +96. After several minutes, Boden and Barnett led Florescue and Seigel into Rothstein's private office. + +97. After introductions, Rothstein described an investment opportunity involving I purchasing various settlements with structuredpavments explaining as follows: + +a RRA is a nationally recognized firm representing whistleblowers in whistleblower lawsuits against employers. RRA has specific expertise in a specific type of litigation called Qui Tani litigation, in which the defendant is also accused of defrauding the United States government. RRA became a magnet for Qui Tam cases following its success as co-counsel in a 2008 Eli Lilly Qui Tam case, which resulted in a \$1 billion plus settlement. + +b. RRA was currently representing whistleblower plaintiffs inside a Fortune 500 company that had allegedly defrauded the United States government. Citing confidentiality, Rothstein could not share the name of the defendant, but he described it as a large food conglomerate that had substituted cheaper ingredients into food supplies sold to the government A"... under national contracts. Rothstein was rounding up dozens of whistleblo3 wird mside the company who had been threatened by senior management to remain company's fraud. ing the + +c. RRA had negotiated numerous settlementas\$1"000.00 for various whistleblower clients, but the defendant insisted on paying the settlements out over four months. The plaintiffs wanted their cash up front. + +d. Rothstein explained that the putative plaintiffs were willing to take a large discount up front because: (i) they had a high degree of concern over whether defendant would attempt to prevent them from receiving payments after settling and, (ii) Rothstein explained in detail a legal concept called "privity" — plaintiff was "in privity" with the defendant which subjected their settlement to reversal by the federal government. Rothstein represented that a third party buyer of the settlement rights would not be subject to such reversal as the third party was not "in privity" with the defendant. + +c. The settlement documents were drafted and ready to be settled, but Rothstein needed to find an investor to fund the settlement. Rothstein explained that such a transaction was legal, because the settlement agreement had no "anti-assignment rights", but that any third party investor couldn't be given any details about the parties involved in the settlement, because it was by nature highly confidential and did contain strong confidentiality provisions. + +f. Due to the fact that a "funder" could not be given any information about the case, the defendant, or the plaintiff, and given the fact that Rothstein needed a high degree of confidentiality about even the existence of the funding arrangement (in order to prevent defendants from explicitly prohibiting this type of arrangement going forward), Rothstein could only engage in such transaction with local friends with whom he trusted. + +g. RRA's clients were willing to accept \$800,000.00 up hange for their rights to the \$1,400,000.00 settlement, payable over 4 months. + +h. Rothstein could not personally fund the st settlements because it was illegal for him or his firm to profit from a structured ttl ent in which he represented the \ v plaintiff. However, it was in his firm's interest to f a so that the firm could settle the case and get paid its contingency fee. + +I. Rothstein remark#5transaction would be substantiated and verified, that he would provide evidence o settlement in his office, and that he would get on the phone with Spinosa of TD Bank to confirm that the putative defendant's funds had been wired into a Florida Bar trust account with instructions to only release the funds in that account to the specified funder. + +98. Upon concluding the meeting, Barnett walked Florescue and Seigel out to the elevator. During a debrief, Barnett revealed that the defendant was Dole Foods, which had knowingly supplied the U.S. Government with impure orange juice in a major juice contract that called for 100% pure orange juice. Barnett said that Rothstein had offered to sign a corporate and personal guaranty as a further inducement to make the investment. + +#### Amended Complaint + +99. Between September 30, 2009 and October 15, 2009, BFMC worked with their counsel and Boden on various transaction documents necessary to close the deal. + +100. During the first week of October 2009, Florescue telephoned Spinosa, who Florescue knew professionally based on various banking activities previously engaged in, to inquire about Rothstein. Spinosa said that he could not talk about Rothstein ivitbout Rothstein's consent. + +101. In early October, 2009, Boden finalized the deal documents for BFMC's investment in three identical RRA settlements: (I) a \$1,400,000.00 structured settlement, payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in c c n? e, for a lump sum payment of \$800,000.00; (2) a second \$1,400,000.00 strut )ili,,, e payable in four equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lum Sy ent of \$800,000.00; and (3) a third tut 51,400,000.00 structured settlement, p our equal monthly installments, offered in exchange for a lump sum payme ,000.00. See correspondence from David Boden which is attached hereto and incorporaate3 herein as Exhibit "DI)." + +102. BFMC's explicit understanding from Boden and Rothstein was that the putative defendant's funds were to be held in RBA's trust account and could only be released directly to BFMC's ac lint pursuant to an irrevocable "lock letter." c(etyl + +10 \_or about October 15, 2009, as part of its due diligence, BFMC obtained a copy of a TD B ock letter' signed by Spinosa stating that: + +> [p]ursuant to your written instructions to us of October 14, 2009, please be advised that all funds contained in the above referenced account shall only be distributed upon your or Stuart Rosenfeldt's instruction and shall only be distributed to BB&T (FICA: Colonial Bank), Pompano Beach Branch # 32083, (954) 943-6550, ABM + +MNIIIM, for further credit to: BFMC Investment, LLC Account # + +Your letter is understood not to convey ownership of the account or access to the account to any other party, but rather is meant to irrevocably restrict conveyances as follows: conveyances shall only be made from the account referenced above to the BB&T (FICA: Colonial Bank) account # belonging to BFMC Investment, LLC. + +See October 15, 2009 lock letter attached hereto and incorporated herein as ExhIbit"EE." + +104. Later that day, and in reliance on the foregoing, BFMC wired \$2,400,000.00 to `;',\_ RRA's 'ID Bank account number + +/ 4- + +#### Implosion of Rothstein's Portz! Schime + +105. In October 2009, the Ponzi scheme reached critical mass. October was a huge month for investor settlement redemptions and Rothstein knew that the influx of new investor capital could not satisfy all previous investor obligations. Sensing that the end was near, Rothstein began planning his escape. + +106. On October 17, 2009, Rothstein sent a firm-wide e-mail at RRA asking for help to determine whether a "olio is facing a multitude of criminal charges in the United States including fraud, laundering and embezzlement—could be extradited to the United States or Israel k after renouncing his United States citizenship. Rotbstein's email asked for countrilr. Abith did not have extradition treaties with the United States or Israel9 and concluded by stating that "[t]his client is related to a very powerful client of ours and so time is of the essence. Lets rock and roll... there is a very large fee attached to this case. Thanks Love ya + +9 Not coincidentally Morocco, Rothstein's destination on October 27, 2009, was one of the countries that I does not have an extradition treaty with either the United States or Israel, + +Scott." See Sun-Sentinel article dated November 16, 2009 referencing the October 17, 2009 email which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "FF." Suffice it to say, Rothstein was the purported "client" and this is the first clear written indication that he knew his fate. + +107. By the end of October 2009, Rothstein and RRA began to default on the investors' structured payments and the Ponzi scheme began to unravel. + +108. On October 26, 2009 Linda Von Allmen spoke with Rothstein ova restaurant who, in between martinis, admitted that he was "having a bad day." Rothstein was joined by a woman and his bodyguard, believed to be Joe Mu, who may have witnessed this exchange. + +Ponzi scheme, confronted Rothstein who wa i• owtiiic • Spinosa inside of Bova restaurant. Pearson, in Spinosa's presence, demanded, to why he had not received two scheduled payments due to him the week prior. Roth. attempted to diffuse the situation leaving Spinosa visibly shaken. / 109. On October 27. 2009, Richard P ear' , whipd invested \$18,000,000.00 in the + +110. Shortly thereafter, Rothstein proceeded to methodically drain the TD Bank RRA accounts dry, depleting virtually all of the remaining investors' money as well as the money of many of the firms' clients. + +111. On the evening of October 27, 2009, Rothstein secretly boarded a private G-5 jet destined for Morocco, but not before completing a \$16,000,000.00 wire transfer to a Moroccan bank. + +115. Reeling from its shameful missteps in connection with the Rothstein scandal, an emergency receiver was appointed for RRA on November 4, 2009 for the purpose of winding down its operations. + +112. By October 30, 2009, investors began to scramble desperately attempting to reach Rothstein for answers. Unbeknownst to them Rothstein was already gone, along with their investments, as the Ponzi scheme finally buckled under the pressure of obligations due. + +113. Alarmed investors frantically reached out to RRA executives and attorneys begging for infommtion as to the whereabouts of Rothstein and their more than \$30?000,000.00 in overdue payments. Stuart Rosenfeldt (hereinafter. "Rosenfeldt") assem IL including Baden, Stay and Grant at RRA to begin answering the delugtcaf1, 4/ or calls by first confirming with Stay (RRA's C.F.Q.) that RRA's onerating\_andlNt accounts contained more than \$1 billion dollars. Shamefully. Stay refused to provide Rosenfeldt the confirmation requested. Growing ever agitated, Rosenfeldt and tit otheta\_continued to press Stay demanding to know what was going onand that she pr;c t account statements. Eventually Stay relented and began inconsolably crying--taxa a the phrase. "I don't want to go to iail," Rosenfeldt proceeded to conference call 'Spinsoa who initially declined to provide account balance verification but after much cajoling finally infomied\_Rosenfeldt that the RRA accounts had been almost completely depleted. + +#### pevastating Fallout + +0 velocity at which the Ponzi scheme cratered sent a sonic boom felt financial and legal world. + +#### Amended Complaint + +116. As the dust begins to settle, critical details have emerged revealing the scope and magnitude of this the nefarious scheme. By way of example Plaintiffs have discovered that: + +- a. the entirety of Plaintiffs' more than \$100,000,000.00 investment is gone; +- b. plaintiffs' "lock letter" accounts were never funded with the purpotted settlement money and contained only a nominal deposit of \$100.00; +- c. even after Rothstein's October 27, 2009 departure to Morocco, millions of dollars continued to flow out of RRA accounts from the Fort Lauderdale TD Bank accounts, indicative of an insider(s) maintaining operations of the Ponzi scheme including, but not limited to: + +| i. | Shimon Levy it | S366.000.00 | +|--------|--------------------|-----------------| +| ii. | Shimon Levy %.7 | S287.500.00 | +| iii. | Onyx capkil \ | \$263,000.00 | +| iv. | Barbe= | \$240,000.00 | +| v. | ShimmtLevv% | \$225.000.00 | +| vi. | Obidia Levy --- | \$250.000.00 | +| vii. | Rachel Levv | \$50,000.00 | +| viii. | Daniel Minkowitz | \$225.000.00 | +| ix. | Benzion Varon | \$33,333.00 | +| x. | Dominic Ponatchio | \$280,000.00 | +| | Daniel Minkowitz | \$200,000.00 | +| | Daniel Minkowitz | \$100,000.00 | +| xlii. | Shimon Levy | \$366,666.00 | +| xiv. | Shimon Levy | \$337,500.00 | +| xv. | Onyx Capital | \$275,000.00 | +| xvi. | Obidia Levy | \$268,000.00 | +| xvii. | Obidia Levy | \$175,000.00 | +| xviii. | Moty Ban-Mon | \$132,000.00 | +| xix. | Benzine Varon | \$33,333.00 | +| xx. | Ahnick Kahlid | \$16.000,000.00 | +| xxi. | EMS Investments | \$300,000.00 | +| xxii. | Pirulin Group | \$300,000.00 | +| xxiii. | Condorde Capital | \$300,000.00 | +| xxiv. | National Financial | \$150,000.00; | + +- d. in April 2009, \$53,060,000.00 in credits and \$51,560,000.00 in debits were transacted through four RRA trust accounts at TD Banlq +- e. in October 2009 \$235,000,000.00 in credits and \$232,000,000.00 in debits were transacted through the RRA accounts at TD Bank; +- f. the \$8,000,000.00 wire transfer confirmation used by Prey to induce Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 payment was i by RRA or TD Bank; on November 1, 2009, Mel Ofshitz invested nearly \$100,000,000.00 in • of investor victims that he personally t with verified investment a= A ances; +- C. ) Securities whose group AhdRAlitstein received scheme, advised a group Spinosa at TD Bank and +- h. during that same n informed the group that he reached out to Rothstein in letting him know that Banvon stood ready to provide nancing if he was having trouble making payments. Astoundingly. Levin's revealing admission took the group by surprise because one of the core "deal" tenants insured against any possible deficit v requiring a Putative defendant's settlement to be funded prior to an investors lump sum Purchase. Thus, any shortfall, even the smallest one, is patently contrary to the investment structure and obvious evidence that the monies are either being misused or are a part of a Ponzi scheme. + +10 The group of investors attending the November 1.2009 meeting include: Kretschmar, Ted Morse, gd Morse, Richard Pearson, Ira et, Mel Lifshitr.J.ALIDiscala, . Mac elvin, Mark Nordlicht, Jack Simony. Steve Jackel, Laurence M. Steve Levin. Levin, Preve, Batty Bekkedam, and Michael Szafransld. + +- i. Plaintiffs now believe that Levin's statement was a thinly-veiled attempt to cover his tracks after Rothstein rejected Levin's last-ditch efforts to persuade Rothstein to keep the Ponzi scheme going. In support. Plaintiffs rely op a October 31, 2009 email from Preve to Rothstein statingibat "We JLevin and Prevel understand that the shortage is now 300m which is still manageable if we have your cooperation. Let me know." to which Rothstein responds, "Mat is not the shortage that is the amount of money needed to give the investors back their money. I really lust need to end it M. It will make it easier for everyone." (emphasis added). The attempt to try and "manage" the hole created now presumes that Levin and Preve had knowledge of a prior deficit and serves as an unwitting admission of their involvement in the perpetuation of the Ponzi scheme; sometime in the Spring or Summer of 2009, Ted Morse was personally provided with a written account balance statement by Caretsky at TD Bank; +- k. S on hilv 27. 2009 Rothstein transferred a property with an assessed value of O 07,750.00 to for "love and affection" and \$100.00. Notwithstanding owning the property free and clear. who earned \$250.000,00 a year, decided to pull \$100,000.00 out of the property days prior to the IRS filing of a forfeiture in rem complaint against the property; + - 1. Berenfeld's audited financial statements for the affiliated Bannon entities confirmed finance receivables of \$517,404,505.00 due from RRA + +settlements worth more than \$1,100,000.000.00, See Composite Exhibit "D." As now discovered, these verified finance receivables were pure fiction. Incontrovertibly. Berenfeld either willfully participated in this fraud or knew or should have known as part of the audit process that the finance receivables were fabricated and incapable o being independently verify; + +- m. Berenfeld's complicity in the Ponzi scheme is further compounded by their role as accountants for RRA and Rothstein and Rosenfeldt individually providing them with first-hand knowledge of the patent inconsistencies between Banvon's purported verified audited receivables and RRA's actual numbers; +- n. due to the vast complexity in maintaining the Ponzi scheme's fraudulent accounting, it is only sophisticated accountants could have accounted for "phantom" investments over a period of four years allowing the Principal Conspirators to generate falsified statements necessary to dupe investors; +- o. s pi Ballamor r and Mr. Bekkedam received a \$5,000.000.00 "loan" from Levin la or procuring investor funds along with a \$18,000,000.00 investment through Ballamor into Nova Bank. a Pennsylvania bank; the TD Bank account statements provided and verified by Szzfranski were completely fabricated and incapable of being confirmed. In most instances, them was either no money in the settlement accounts or the amounts contained were hundreds of millions less than what was + +- q. TD Bank either knew or certainly should have known of the criminality and/or gross irregularities of RRA's operations. Alternatively, TD Bank's actions and/or omissions in not conducting any due diligence inquiry into RRA's suspicious activities, unorthodox settlement structures, lack of supporting document and vigilant (if no o ive) control over account access was either deliberate or reek + +represented in the statements (see Comparison Chart of Actual Account Balances with Provided Deal Account Statements as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Composite Exhibit "GG."): and + +117. A Ponzi scheme cannot be operated der help. Plaintiffs believe that additional members of RRA, including its noSic a estigators, were used by Rothstein to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi sche . The details of these individuals or entities involvement and participation is presently unknown but further allegations and counts will be added as discovery is conducted and information concerning the complicity of these individuals or entities is confirmed. + +#### Jurisdiction and Venue + +court has jurisdiction over this matter as an action for damages in excess of S100, exclusive of attorneys' fees, costs and interest. + +119. Venue is appropriate Broward County, Florida, pursuant to § 47.011, Fla. Stat., because the Defendants' reside in Broward County, Florida and the cause of action accrued in Broward County, Florida. + +120. All conditions precedent, if any, have been met, waived or excused. + +121. Plaintiffs have retained the undersigned firm and have agreed to pay it a reasonable fee. + +**COUNT 41 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION** +(against Scott Rothstein) + +122. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107121 as if restated herein. + +123. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +124. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +125. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein knowingly made material false statements and representations, including but not limited to representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +126. Rothstein intended the Banyon Investors to act on his knowingly false representations. + +127. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Rothstein's representations to their detriment. + +128. As a direct and proximate result of Rothstein's false statements, The Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS, LP;; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT112 - FRAUDULENT MISRE PRESENTATIO IS (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +129. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in varagr s I)through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +130. This is a claim for fraudulent misreprese tidN + +131. As described more fully above, R operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +132. In furtherance of the P6 4eheme. Kerstetter knowingly made material false statements and representations Mehl iut not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +133. Kerstetter intended the Banyon Investors to act on her knowingly false representations. + +134. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to their d etiiment. + +135. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false statements, the Banyon investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. THE—LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS, LPT; DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID + +VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as 'he Court deems proper. + +O AS + +## COUNT 1113 - FRAUDULENT M1SREPRESE TI ON (against Roseanne Caretskvl + +136. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations conta' paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +137. This is a claim for fraudulent C \ ttnon. + +138. As described more fully above R was operating a Ponzi scheme through firm. RRA, and through TD Ba + +the ,, 139. In furtherance k)- th nzi scheme. Caretsky knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +140.i CaLetsIN i intended the Banvon Investors to act on her knowingly false ir oge l + +14 . The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to their detriment. + +142. As a direct and proximate result of Caretsky's false statements, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, THE—LINDA VON ALLMENT as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST:: D&L PARTNERS, LP;; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such furASref'as the Court deems prover. + +C5) + +149. TD Bank. throu Lgdistetter and Caretsky, intended the Banyon Investors to act on their knowingly false ntations. + +#### COUNT W4 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A. + +143. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4-07121 as if restated herejn. + +144. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. A 145. At all times material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scope employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +146. At all times material hereto, Caretskv was acting in the of her employment as an assistant vice resident and b + +147. As described more fully above Rothst rating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +148. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. ID Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +150. yon Investors justifiably relied upon TD Bank's through Kerstetter's and Caretskv tations to their detriment. + +AS a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's. made through Kerstetter's and Caretsky's, false statements, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN? as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST?: D&L PARTNERS, LP?: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK. N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT VS - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against G. Levin) + +152. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 ( S gh , 121 as if restated herein. CO + +153. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +/ --N 154. As described more fully above. Rothstein was operatik a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +155. In furtherance of the Ponzi sc statements and representations including, bLot 'Milted to. representing that the settlement \'' n knowingly made material false agreements purchased by investors were-veal.-that they had been fully funded. and that they would be paid out to investors over rmined schedule. + +156. Levin intend Banyon Investors to act on his knowingly false representations. + +157. Yon Investors justifiably relied upon Levin's representations to their SIM.111 ; 1 O + +. As a direct and proximate result of Levin's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages, + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +t;: • + +LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 6 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against' Preve) + +159. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. gh 121 as + +160. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +161. As described more fully above, Rothstein was e a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +162. In furtherance of the Ponzi sc N 4 h 'e e knowingly made material false statements and representations including, ot li ited to, representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors we hat they had been fully funded. and that they would be paid out to investors oc egs)a ermined schedule. + +163. Preve intended Bartvon Investors to act on his knowingly false representations, + +164. von Investors justifiably relied upon Preve's representations to their + +As a direct and proximate result of Preve's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 7 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC) + +166. plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs ugh 121 as d restated herein. + +167. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +168. At all times material hereto, Levin was acting opc of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +169. At all times material hereto. Prey 5\ '4 in in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banvon II'VI an IIIF. + +170. As described more fullyabove. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD C io, N. + +171. In furtherance o onzi scheme. Banyon USVI and BIF. through Levin and Preve, knowingly made trial false statements and representations including. but not limited to, representing e settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been full nd that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +Banvon USVI and BIF, through Levin and Preve. intended the Banvon Investors to act on their knowingly false representations. + +173. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Banyon USVI's and BM's, through 1...evin's and Preve's, representations to their detriment. + +174. As a direct and proximate result of Banvon USVI's and BIF's. made through Levin's and Preve's. false statements and representations, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMF.N as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN D 4 NASTY %, TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of th V VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the 14/ LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against B ALLMEN ON INCOME FUND. LP. and BANYON USW, LLC., for compensatory dy, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 8 - FRAUDULENT 4RESENTATION (against Michael S turista) + +175. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +176. This is a claim fqrfra t misrepresentation. + +177. As described mLfuliy above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and throu k + +178. Itf &awe of the Ponzi scheme. Szfranski knowingly made material false statcmenttt t to eseentations including, but not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal d + +179. Szfranski intended the Banvon Investors to act on his knowingly false representations. + +180. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Szfranski's representations to their detriment. + +181. As a direct and proximate result of Szfranski's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: WEL PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DA VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN LIVING TRUST: and = KRETSCHMAR request iudgment j ) SZMICHAEL SZPRANSKI for compensatory damages, together with court costs an er relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 9 - FRAUDULENT MIS ATION (against Onyx Capital tl + +182. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations min • in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if ye-stated herein. + +183. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +184. At all times material heketo, Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +185. As describe! more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, nth TD Bank. + +aem 1 . rtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Onyx. through Szfranski, knowingly material false s ts and representations, including, but not limited to. verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +187. Onyx. through Szfranski, intended the Banyon Investors to act on its knowingly false representations. + +188. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Onyx's. through Szfranski's, representations to their detriment. + +189. As a direct and proximate result of Onyx's. made through Szfranski's. false representations, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +A...\_.\_ WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALL I'S xvD ASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee ID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of a ON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and' KRETSCHMAR request iud 5c1 gainst ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, for compensatory damages. together• i 4, ilici sts and such further relief A \ as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 10 - FRAUDUL rilli EPRFSENTATION (against Berenfeld S r er Shechter Sheer, LLP) + +190. Plaintiffs incorporate ns contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +191. This is a claim for fratidulent misrepresentation. + +192. As describt more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his film. RRA, andibrough TD Bank. + +}ttrtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Berenfeld knowingly made material false stateme an representations including, but not limited to. providing false auditing documents relating to Banvon and RRA. + +194. Berenfeld intended the Banvon Investors to act on its knowingly false representations. + +- 195. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Berenfeld's representations to their detriment. + +1%. As a direct and proximate result of Berenfeld's false statements, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee o the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of tile A ON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request iud n t against 13ERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER. LIP, for compensatory djmjgeljb6gether with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 11- NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +- 197. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40;121 as if restated herein. r 14/ + - 198. This is a claim for neghgent misrepresentation. +- 199. As describe fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RICA, a ugh TD Bank. rtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Kerstetter made material false statements and represe including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. +- 201. When making the false statements and representations. Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +202. Kerstetter owed the Banvon Investors a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform them. + +203. Kerstetter breached her duty to the Banvon inverters-Investors by make false 27; Th\i Th\r representations with the intention that the Banyon Investors rely on them. + +204. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's reCatIons to their detriment. + +205. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter' e statements, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON AILMENT Sit the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST-: D&L PARTNERS, LPT: DAVID V N, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VO as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and AR request judgment against JENNIFER KJ3RSTb1 UR for compensat4ry damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### 2 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Roseanne Caretskv) + +O PI tiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4O7121 as if restated herein. + +207. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +208. As described more fully above Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +Investors have sustained damages. 213. As a direct and proximate re S it etsky's false statements, the Banyon + +WHEREFORE. LINDA V TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS, £g it.' ENT as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the DAVID VQIN ALLMEN LIVING TRLI • ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST:c7d KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY,'for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems,proper. + +209. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Caretsky made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the amounts in RRA trust accounts. + +210. When making the false statements and representations. Caretsky either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +211. Caretsky owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confi %ij Ur and relying on her to inform them + +212. Caretsky breached her duty to the Bir vectors by making false representations with the intention that the Banvon on them. + +#### COUNT W113 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TI) Bank, N.A.) + +214. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 10-7121 as if restated herein. + +215. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +216. At all times material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scope mplovinent as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +217. At all times material hereto, Caretsky was acting in the cope)of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bat\*, \ , + +- \ ''. 218. As described more fully above, Rothsteitt,was-o/ peratme a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. , k V + +219. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, made material false statements and representations. including, but not limited to, showing investors false statements of the RRA trust accounts. + +220. When making QfaftiiIse statements and representations, TD Bank. through Kerstetter and Ceretslcv. 11;:tylmew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +221. k owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know thaC h e ul) anvon Investors were placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +ti 222. ID Bank breached its duty to the Banvon Investors by making false representations, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, with the intention that the Banvon Investors rely on them. + +223. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon TD Bank's. through Kerstetter's and Caretsicv's. representations to their detriment. + +224. M a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's representations, made through Kerstetter and Caretsky, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON AILMENT as Trustee of the VON AL DYFIASTY TRUSTY. D&L PARTNEFtS, LP4 DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee VID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of C ON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgm TD BANK. N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and relief as the Court deems prover. + +#### COUNT V11114 - NEGLI REPRESENTATION (against + +225. Plaintiffs incorporate ns contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +226. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +227. As describrd more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his Eon, RRA. d ugh TD Bank. + +2k herance of the Ponzi scheme, Levin made material false statements and repres is including, but not limited to, representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +229. When making the false statements and representations. Levin either knew or re onablv should have known that they were false, + +#### Amended Complaint + +230. Levin owed the Banvon Investors a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that the Banvon Investors were placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform them. + +231. Levin breached his duty to the Banyon investors by making false representations with the intention that the Banvon Investors rely on them. + +232. The Banyan Investors justifiably relied upon Levin's representations to their detriment. + +233. As a direct and proximate result of Levin's false stn t ents. the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP; DAVID V c m as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VO ? . as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and S R request judgment against LEVIN for compensatory damages. toget1Cwith court costs and such further relief as the Court deems %...) proper. + +#### 15 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (aaainst Preve) + +234. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +235. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation, + +236. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +237. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Preve made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +238. When making the false statements and representations. Preve either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +239. Preve owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care becau he e or had reason to know that the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confid him and relying on him to inform them. + +240. Preve breached his duty to the Ban by making false representations with the intention that the Banyan Investors re %the + +241. The Banyon Investors justifie detriment. lied upon Preve's representations to their V•• + +242. As a direct and tro xima e result of Preve's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREF V . L A VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; DotnIARINERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON A'''• fisi) All-MEN Is \_ G TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN j,,,IVIN RUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +the chief executive officer of Banyon USVI and BM. A 245. At all times material hereto, Levin was acting in the scone of li tAl loyment as 0 + +#### COUNT 16 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Banyon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC) + +243. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +244. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation, + +246. At all times material hereto. Preve was acting in the his employment as ""%, the chief operating officer or agent of Banvon USVI and BM. + +247. As described more fully above. Rothsteiwwa operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through 7D Bank. + +248. In furtherance of the Ponzi sc'ne yon USVI and MR through Levin and peeve, made material false statemm~en~~t representations including, but not limited to, representing that the settlement agceetGenlii purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +249. When m e false statements and representations. Banvon USVI and IMF, through Levin atheve, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +Avon USVI and BIF owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because it knew or ha 11 to know that the Banvon Investors were placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +251. Sanvon USVI and B1F breached its duty to the Banyon Investors by making false representations. through Levin and Preve, with the intention that the Banyon Investors rely on them. + +252. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Banyon USVI's and BIF's, thmugh Levin's and Preve's, representations to their detriment. + +253. As a direct and proximate result of Banyon USVI's and BIF's representations, made through Levin and Preve. the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee qf the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of ON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgm 1- • st BANYON INCOME FUND. LP, and BANYON USVI. LW.. for compensa . together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems Droner. + +#### COUNT 17 - NEGLIGENT RESENTATION (against Michael Szfranski) + +254. Plaintiffs incorporate gjjegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +255. This is a claim fo igent misrepresentation. + +256. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA ough TD Bank + +rtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Szfranski made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to. verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +258. When making the false statements and representations. Szfranski either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +259. Szfranski owed the Banyan Investors a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that, as an independent verifier, the Banyan Investors were placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform them. + +260. Szfranski breached his duty to the Banyan investors by making false representations with the intention that the Banvon Investors rely on them. + +261. The Banvon Investors justifiably relied upon Szfranski's representations to their detriment. + +262. As a direct and proximate result of Szfranski's fade statements, the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON AI.LMFN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID V N, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VO as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and HMAR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensato , together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### 18 - NEGLIGE MISREPRESENTATION (against Onvx Capital Management) + +63. C Pla tiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restate erem. + +264. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +265. At all times material hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +266. As described more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA. and through TD Bank. + +267. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Onyx. through Szfranski, made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +268. When making the false statements and representations, Onyx. through Szfranski, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +269. Onyx owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that, as an independent verifier. the Banvon Invest e placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +270. Onyx breached its duty to the through Szfranski, with the intention that the Bandon Investors rely on them. estors by making false representations, + +s 271. The Banvon Inve rs justifiably relied upon Onyx's. through Szfransld's, representations to their detri + +272. As a dit\sejsnd r proximate result of Onyx's representations, made through Szfranski, theTtanvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHFREEORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUE` tlARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVE) VON AL1MEAbLIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request intim-tient against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +**COUNT 19 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION** +**(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)** + +273. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +274. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +275. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +276. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Berenfeld made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, providing false auditing documents relating to Banyon and RRA. + +277. When making the false statements and representations, Berenfeld either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +278. Berenfeld owed the Banyon Investors a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that, as an independent auditor, the Banyon Investors were placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +279. Berenfeld breached its duty to the Banyon investors by making false representations with the intention that the Banyon Investors rely on them. + +280. The Banyon Investors justifiably relied upon Berenfeld's representations to their detriment. + +281. As a direct and proximate result of Berenfeld's false statements, the Banyon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON + +ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against BERENFELD SPR -ER SHECHTER SHEER, LLP, for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems Droner. + +#### COUNT 20 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY MIT (against Spinosa) + +282. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrap .ugh 121 as if restated herein. + +283. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +284. Spinosa was aware that as trustee of th tolirrtrust account where the Banvon Investors' purported settlement funds were depo ' 4 tein had fiduciary duties of honesty loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. St sa vtlGc also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds toCiel the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to Ni collect in the near future, Rotbstei ackduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. + +285. Spinosa w that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and are that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banvon 0 + +Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +287. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors, + +Prover. WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against A. ScPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as thepCourt deems + +CO + +#### COUNT 21- AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OP FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +288. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107121 as if restated herein. + +289. This is a claim for aiding andFaHting breach of fiduciary duty. + +290. Kerstetter was aware thatasutrustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement/Ands were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. Kerstetter was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accoun ontajning the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive ri ght to collect near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty. and care to the Banyon Investors. + +k ,.' Kerstetter was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banvon Investors. + +292. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +293. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and [REDACTED] KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +**COUNT FX22 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY** +**(against Roseanne Caretsky)** + +294. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +295. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +296. Caretsky was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Caretsky was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +297. Caretsky was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +298. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +299. Caretskv's actions have directly causcd iniury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMENT as Trustee of the VON A D TRUSTY: D&L PARTNERS, LP;.; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee VIP VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of ON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judiRtpent CARETSKY for compensatory damages. together with Court deems proper, against ROSEANNE . nd such further relief as the + +#### COUNT X23 - AIDING AND ABETTI1A1BRACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TO Bank, N.A.) + +300. Plaintiffs incorporate e allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +301. This is a claim fSaidfng and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +302. At all timek material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scone of her employment as an assistant r of TD Bank. + +to3 % . 11 times material hereto. Caretskv was acting in the scope of her employment as an vice president and branch manager of TD Bank + +304. TD Bank was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banvon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. TD Bank was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banvon Investors had an exclusive + +right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. + +305. TD Bank was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligatiots to the Banyon Investors. + +306. TD Bank, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance. to Rothstein in hjs financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +307. TD Bank's actions have directly causetYnytryiS1Id damage to the Banvon Investors + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON AL Ilt tee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS, LP;: DAylg V ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING Tru. tee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and AR request judgment against TD BANK. N.A., for compensatory damages,17ether with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems gram + +#### CO 24\ AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Debra + +Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4O7121 as if restated herein. + +309. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +310. was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, + +loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Danyon Investors. + +311. was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the iurvegtoriio their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obli e Banvon Investors. + +312. actively assisted, and provided substan ' 'stance. to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his bred fMduiciary duty. + +313. actions have directly and damage to the Banvon Investors, + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON c Elves ie Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS. LPT. V , VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ALLNIFINI. as Trustee of the ANN\_ VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and ICRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, ether with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### 5 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Irene Stay) + +314. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +detriment and wt a are that Rothstein was b Investors, 317. Stay was aware that Rothstein was financially exploi ng t vestors to their obli ations to the Banyan + +)3anvon Investors. 316. Stay was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Stay was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty. int cantto the + +318. Stay actively assisted, and provi St iS? assistance,. to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors ' b cites of fiduciary duty, + +319. Stay's actions have dime jury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON s as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. VID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TR • ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory diuniNg, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems + +#### 26 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY a ainst G. Levin) + +320. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +322. Levin was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Igy\_estors' purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Levin was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banvon Investors had an exclusive t right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty. gn4 the Banvon Investors. + +323. Levin was aware that Rothstein was financially expl detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fidpct obligations to the Banyon Investors. Qvestors to their + +financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors ches of fiduciary duty. 324. Levin actively assisted, and provid ;I I al assistance, to Rothstein in his i sr , + +325. Levin's actions have di . injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA V as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUS34NN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST ( d KRETSCHMAR request judgment against G. LEVIN for compensate O aN, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems + +#### 27 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (earliest Preve) + +326. plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein, + +328. Preve was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors. Preve was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banvon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and\_ care to the Banvon Investors. + +329. Preve was aware that Rothstein was financially explo vestors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fidpciar obligations to the Banyon investors. + +330. Preve actively assisted, and provid 7spbs iitL assistance, to Rothstein in his ic financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors ches of fiduciary duty, + +331. Preve's actions have direc cius thin/ and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA V N as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS, VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and ICRETSCHMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems propel' + +#### COUNT 28 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Banvon Income Fond, LP. and Banvon DWELL° + +332. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +334. At all times material hereto. Levin was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +335. At all times material hereto, Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banyon USVI and BIB. + +336. Eanyon USVI and RIF were aware that as trustee of the attomey.shst tints where the Banvon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. Banvon USVI and RIP were also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which the Banvon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near fuiprc, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of R honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors, \ V + +wa44%, 337. Banvon USVI and BIF were a i othstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and wcrer + WSthat pi Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obli ations to the Ban on Investors + +338. Banyon USVI and B . rough its employees acting within the scone of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +339. Banyon USVI's and BIF's actions have directly caused injury and damaee to the Banyon Investors. + +. IIEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against BANYON INCOME + +FUND, LP, and BANYON USVI, LLC., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 29 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Michael Szfranski) + +340. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 thoatifigiS4 as if restated herein. + +341. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary 41uO + +342. Szfranski was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Banvon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banvon Investors, ir sktwas also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds Banvon Investors had an exclusive tight to collect in the near future, Rothstein hkfiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +343. Szfranski was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was awaits that Rothstein was breachiniA, his fiduciary obligations to the Banyon Investors. + +344. Id actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financt on of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +Szfranski's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the Banvon Investors, + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### 30 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY D (against Onyx Capital Management) + +346. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs! gh 1 1 as if restated herein. + +347. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduci + +348. At all times material hereto. Szfranski was actitllt in scope of his employment as president of Onyx, + +349. Onyx was awam that as trustee o AS SIS/trust accounts where the Banyon Investors' purported settlement funds were sit Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to the Banyon hives x was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the ich the Banvon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Ro had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to the Banyon Investors. + +350. detrime Inves fitft was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banvon + +351. Onyx, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance. to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +352. Onyx's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, 1P; DAVID VON ALLMEN\_as T stee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and suc 4 .,her relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 31- AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF F1t1 CI DUTY (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer. + +353. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contai its I through 121 as if restated herein + +354. This is a claim for aiding and abettin h of fiduciary duty. + +355. Berenfeld was aware that 'if te the attorney trust accounts where the Banvon Investors' purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to t Banvon Investors. Bcrenfeld was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts con&niatr the funds to which the Banyon Investors had an exclusive right to collect in the . Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to the Banvon Inv + +nfeld was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to th ment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to the Banvon Investors. + +357. Berenfeld actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +358. perenfeld's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVr VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER. LLP. for compensatory damages, toter 'ly lecourt costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 32 — BREACH OF FIDIJIARY DUTY (against Scott Ro flu\ 1 1 + +if restated herein. 359. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegatio I\(441 ' '•', ainst TD BANTK, N.A., for l ip Ifp compensatory damages, together with court costs her relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XW34 - F FIDUCIARY DUTY a G. Levin + +371. Plaintiffs incorp\_orhte eyilegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +372. This is a clVn for breach of fiduciary duty. + +373. ding himself out as a co-investor, Levin became a fiduciary of the Banyon jpvestors@ ow the Banyon Investors the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +Levin breached his fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors. + +375. Levin's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLIVIEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against G. LEVIN for coin n ate damages to ether with court costs •nd such rther rc proper, eeMS + +#### COUNT 35 - BREACIEIFIDUCIARY DUTY (against Preve) + +376. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations containe iyarauraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +377. This is a claim for breach of Ethic' let, + +378. )3v holding himself out as a cc v . Previn became a fiduciary of the Banvon Investors and owed the Banyon Investors the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +N 379. Preve breached LIs, duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistan Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors + +380. actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +RE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSC • • request iudgment against PREVE for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 36 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC) + +381. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs] through 121 as if restated herein. + +382. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +Assac i 383. At all times material hereto. Levin was acting in the scope o )lovment as the chief executive officer of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +1. 384. At all times material hereto. Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banvon USVI and BIF. •- \ ..21 + +385. Banyon USVI and BIF were fiduciarie f Qtanvon Investors and owed them the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +386. Banvon USVI and RIF breact(th \ fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or a lively assistintand providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial emptyC. • A Suwon Investors + +387. Banvon 1.JSVPs IF's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors + +LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUSTma- TNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALL ING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP, and BANYON USVI. LLC., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 37 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Michael Szfranski) + +388. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +389. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +Assec 390. Szfranski, as an independent verifier, was a fiduciary of the B c) OS vestors and owed them the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +391. Szfranski breached his fiduciary duties by either ignorirkorptively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his fie% Investors. foliation of the Banyan + +392. Szfranski's actions have directly aScl S)Ajury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON\ as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and DEAN KRETSCHMAR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI f pensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Cou + +#### COUNT 38 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Onyx Capital Management) + +393. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +394. 'this is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +395. At all times material hereto, Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +396. Onyx. as an independent verifier. was a fiduciary of the Banyon Investors and owed them the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +397. Onyx breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Roths inlits financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors. r + +398. Onyx's actions have directly caused injury and d4magt to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trus ti \oNViON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST': D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN ICRETS uest judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensat alga together with court costs and such further relief as LIVING TRUST; and the Court deems proper, + +#### COUNT 39 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (nett Berenfeld Snritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP) + +PlraidlIs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if ted + +400. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +401. Berenfeld, as an independent auditor, was a fiduciary of the Banyon Investors and owed them the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +402. Berenfeld breached its fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors. + +403. Iierenfeld's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyan Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALL1v1EN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Tru /Sort( DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trust the NN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and' KRETSCHMAR requ(jtt fitment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER. LIP. for compens c , es. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper,I + +#### COUNT 40 - AIDING A ABETTING FRAUD ( -Inc Spinosa) + +404. Plaintiff incomorates pilegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +405. This is a c r aiding and abetting fraud. + +406. Ascribed more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD + +407. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +408. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banyon Investors through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included, but + +proper. WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON A ASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee ID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as trustee of e PN ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgmetrThjnst for compensatory damages, together with court costs andt er relief as the Court deems A. SPINOSA + +was not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +409. Spinosa's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +#### COUNT 41 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +410. Plaintiffs incorporate tJ1e allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein f a + +411. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +412. As describe,, more fully above, the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus anditothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +Kerstetter knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +414. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of The Banyon Investors through fraud. Kerstetter's assistance included, but was not limited to. providing false documentation to the Banvon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +415. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the Banyon Investors + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;; D&L PARTNERS. LP.e. DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON AU-MEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN YOtl ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs ech further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XV42 - AIDING AND AB (against Roseanne Care + +416. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegatio in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 &I if restated herein. + +417. This is a claim for aidi g fraud, + +418. As described mo ve. the deals in which the Bannon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was ng a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank, + +419. A knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +4k Icy actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his finanni exploitation of The Banyon Investors through fraud. Caretslcv's assistance included, but was not limited to,providing false documentation to the Bannon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +421. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMENT as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUSTY: D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against RDQEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory dam ges, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deemsproper. + +#### COUNT X-VI43 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +422. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 107121 as jf restated herein, Y + +423. This is a clahn for aiding and abe ' \ ud A'\* ,, + +424. M described more fully ab e, a daålsin which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operatinØonzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +425. At all times matetial-lereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager o ank. + +426. At all times material hereto. Caretskv was acting in the scope of her employment as an assts president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +t 428. TI) Bank, through Kerstetter and Caretsky, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to. providing false documentation to the Banyon Investors that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +A ' 'ID Bank knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +if restated herein, 430. Plaintiffs incorporate the alle atio s 'ned in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as + +429. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Bannon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN: as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;: D&L PARTNERS, LP:: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and ICRETSCHMAR request judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further/chef as the Court deems prover. + +#### COUNT\_X-W144 - AIDI G A t A (against Debra + +'S-431. This is a claim for aiding and abeninu fraud. + +432. As described morefiAW allove. the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his finn, RRA, and through TI) Bank + +finan actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his oitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including the Banvon Investors, through fraud. assistance included, but was not limited to, furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +433. knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +restated herein, 436. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegati N s e 'n in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + +435. actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;: D&L PARTNERS. 12-: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DA VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA for compensatog damages, together with court costs and such further felief e Court deems proper. + +# COUNT XX11145 - AIDING AND A FRAUD (against Irene A N + +Se 437. This is a claim for aidthaalaetting fraud. / 2 ., N. + +438. As described moo f awe. the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was Mina a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank + +439. ew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +Aist % actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financi ex itation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including the Banvon Investors, through fraud. Stay's assistance included, but was not limited to, furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +441. Stay's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: Dad, PARTNER& LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN JIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 46 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD faeninst G. Levin) + +442. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained In paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +443. This is a claim for aiding and abc n + +As described more fully abov e d8å\1.s in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was opera ' g tponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TI) N Bank. / 14/ + +445. Levin knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +446. Levin acts isted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial expl t of the Banvon Investors through fraud. Levin's assistance included, but was not limited t representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they\_ had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +447. Levin's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 47 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Preve) + +448. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in para ugh 121 as if restated herein. + +449. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +450. As described more fully above, the deal • s •c11 the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi aclihile t ugh his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +451. Preve knew of Rothste• lent scheme. + +452. Preve actively ti aptl provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the B Investors through fraud. Preve's assistance included, but was not limited to. repres M1tdg that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had £fully y funded. and that they would be paid out to investors over a redete ,'' -, sc. ,ule + +Preve's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banton Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCIIMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 48 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Bannon USVI, LLC) + +454. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs restated herein. 121 as if + +455. This is a claim fotaiding and abetting fraud. + +456. As described more fully above, the deals in wbich the anyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was qperating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through T1) Bank. + +457. At all times material hereto. LAD waracting in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of BANYO + +458. At all times mate ll' , Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or az anvon USVI and B1P, + +459. Banv n US a d RIF knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +460. Bit USVI and BIF, through Levin and Preve, actively assisted. and provided substanti fraud. von USVI's and BIF's assistance included, but was not limited to. representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they mould be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the Banvon Investors through + +461. Banvon USVI's and BIF's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the )3anyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR repuest judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP, and BANYON USVI. LLC.. for compensatory damages. together pilk coot costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 49 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Michael Szfranski) + +462. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +463. This is a claim for aiding and abetting < ud. år + +464. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was o Bank. 465. Szfranski knew o CI i Lothstein's fraudulent scheme, Ponzi scheme through his firm, and throu + +466. ,Szfranski ti 'vlry l assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploi of the Banvon Investors through fraud. Szfranski's assistance included, but was nQt t to. verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +7. Szfranski's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN restated herein. 468. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I AS gh i 121 as if C O + +469. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT SO - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Onyx Capital Manauement) + +470. As described more fully above, the deals in anon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi sche is firm, RRA. and through TD Bank. + +471. At all times material hereto, as acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +472. Onyx knew of R 's udulent scheme. + +473. Onyx. through S oA '. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial tation of the Banyon Investors through fraud. Onyx's assistance included, but w n imited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents. 4a3. 's actions have directly caused injury and damage to the Banyon Investors. + +FORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 51- AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP) + +475. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +476. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +477. As described more fully above, the deals in which the vph Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme througkhis firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +478. Berenfeld knew of Rothstein's fra + +479. Berenfeld actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of the B nyon Investors through fraud. Bcrenfeld's assistance ERA. . included, but was not limited tot- plvifling false auditing documents relating to Banvon and 14b/ ) + +480. Berenfeld 1?r ons have directly caused injury and damage to the Banvon Investors. + +RE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TR S , PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRErSCHMAR request judgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER, LLP, for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 52— CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +481. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4W121 as if restated herein. + +482. This is a claim for conversion. + +483. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyoy, k tors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his teEA.snd through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised u:Chorized dominion and control over the property of the Banvon investors when he absconded with the Banvon Investors \$60,000550,000.00 in funds + +484. Rothstein's conversion of the B the Banvon Investors of their property. o ls\e.s rs funds has \_permanently deprived + +485. Based upon Rothstein a haft fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the tors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +486. Rothstein's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +RE, LINDA VON ALLMEN- as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUSS &L PARTNERS, LP;: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ,ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against SCOTT RCHTISTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper, + +#### COUNT X1X53 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer-KepstettefFrank Spinosa) + +487. 121aintiffeateeveratePlaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40.7121 as if restated herein. + +488. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +489. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Bnnvon Tnlejfors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA. qtd through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banvon Investors when 13e 'ed with naeirthe Banyon Investors' S60,000550.000.00 in funds. + +490. Rothstein's conversion of the Ban o Ses rs' funds has permanently deprived \ \* the Banvon Investors of their property. + +491. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts. any attempts by the Banvo7lQn Estors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +492. Spinosa ad assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporan ermanently depriving the Banvon Investors of its property by deceiving the Ban von Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +493. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCEIMAR request judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +restated herein. 494. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 di1 as if 0 + +495. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +#### COUNT 54 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +496. As described more fully above, the deals in which "0 Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,550,000.00 in funds. + +497. Rothstein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banvon Investors of their property. + +498. Based noon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts. any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +499. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +500. ,Kerstetter's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +Bank. In furtherance of the LI control over the property \$60,989550,000.00 in fund 503. As described more fully above, \ e dea s in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operaf g ''scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD e. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and Banvon Investors when he absconded with their + +the Court deems proper, WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST:: D&L PARTNERS, LP;: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such c per relief as + +#### COUNT MC55 - AIDING AND ABETTING CO (against Roseanne Caretskv) + +501. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contain aphs 1 through 107121 as if restated herein. 4 + +502. This is a claim for aiding and abets'' it<14I version. ., + +504. Rbth7t ' 's conversion of the Banyon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the BanyoQ of their property. + +Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +506. Caretsky actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banvon Investors of their property by deceiving the Banvon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +507. Caretskv's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyan Investors. + +TRUST;: D&L PARTNERS, I,13;; DAVID VON ALLMEN. as T o DAVID VON WHEREFORE. LID VON i as Trustee of the VON A YNASTY ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Tres the VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCITMAR request' t against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together ' t!kpigr sts and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X XI56 - AIDING ABETTING BETTING v CONVERSION (against TD Bank, NA.I + +508. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +509. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +Ad 510. cc ribed more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus 'tt i stein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through ID erance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,000550,000.00 in funds. + +511. Rothstein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their property. + +#### Amended Complaint + +512. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +513. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. An Sy + +514. At all times material hereto. Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +515. TD Bank. through its employees while ac ' thin the scope of their employment. actively assisted. and provided substar nee. to Rothstein in either 0 temporarily or permanently depriving the Batty i g of their property by allowing Rothstein to make unauthorized withdrawals A ' %and by deceiving the Banvon Investors into turning its property over to Rothste -' n rtlas e pretenses. , I + +\..—' 516. TD Bank's actions4tav directly caused injury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. aA VON ALLMENT as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST-; D&L P LP;; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN I TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING , and KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against TD BANK N.A., for comper 6ry\_ damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXII57 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Debra + +517. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through -1-0:F121 as if restated herein. + +518. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +519. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm d through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised tin d dominion and control over the property of the Banvon Investors when he abe d vith the Banyon Investors' \$60,000550,000.00 in funds. + +520. Rothsteirt's conversion of the Ban \s ' funds has permanently deprived , the Banyon Investors of their property. + +521. Based upon Rothstein havipg initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +522. v assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarilt permanently depriving the Banvon Investors of their property by deceiving the Ban von Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST-: D&L PARTNERS, LP;: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +restated herein. 524. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 t IS gh 121 as if 0 + +525. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT WIL58- AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Irene Stay) + +Cj + +526. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyan Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi sche ht~stgh his firm. RRAt and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Roth ' a rcised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investarcv' he absconded with the Banyon Investors' \$60.550.000.00 in funds. + +527. Rothstein's convessiolljpfflte Banyon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their pfiperti; + +528. Based upo otha having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any att6tt s by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their tile. + +Stay actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property by deceiving the Ramon Investors into turning their property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +530. Stay's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST\*, D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against IRENE AY for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as I S outt , deems proper. + +#### COUNT 59 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVE€5) (against G. Levin) + +531. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contain ranhs 1 through 121 as if 9 restated herein. + +532. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +533. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operath)g kfonzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD \t/ Bank. In furtherance of the az e. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the on Investors when he absconded with their 560,550,000.00 in funds. + +ISZ ilir 534. A tein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Ban ,di k is of their property. + +. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +536. Levin actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banvon Investors of their property by representing that + +540. As descri were bonus an ,ra re fully above, the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested n was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. herance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control the property of the Banvon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,550,000.00 in funds. + +the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule, and by deceiving the Banvon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +537. Levin's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and s \iter} relief as the Court deems proper. + +restated herein. 538. Plaintiffs incorporate iJte allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + +#### COUNT 60 - AIDING ANOAILETTING CONVERSION (against Prevel + +539. This is a claim f • ing and abetting conversion. Cd + +541. Rothstein's conversion of the Baryon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banvon Investors of their property. + +542. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +543. rieVe actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors admit' properly by representing that the settlement agreements Purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule, and by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +544. Preve's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to the Banvon Investors. WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as 7ka of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID V0N%I EN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN V0t4JI1 1 N, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and AR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for comnensato , together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### CO 1 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION nst Ramon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI. LLC) + +tiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if re ta + +546. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +547. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banvon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,550,000.00 in funds. + +548. Rothstein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banyon Investors of their property. + +549. Based noon Rothstein having initialt fled the count after trust accounts, any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him ni of their properly would be futile. + +C.) 550. At all times material hereto, Levin was acting irytf ope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banyon USVI and BIF, + +551. At all times material hereto, Preve w At i the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banvon 94S , + +552. Banvon USVI and RIF. rough a employees while acting within the scone of their employment, actively assis a rovided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently dei yi e Banyon Investors of their property by representing that the settlement be agneemen tr oy hased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, that they would paireaut to i estors over a predetermined schedule, and by deceiving the Banvon , Investors int ) tlys Property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +S~mvon USVI's and BIF's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND, LP, and BANYON USVI, LW., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 62 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Michael Szfranski) + +554. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs gh 121 as if restated herein. + +555. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +556. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banvon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi sch Nathis .. firm. RRA, and through TA Sank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Roth n e excised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banyon Investors Sn he absconded with their \$60,550.000.00 in funds. + +557. Rothstein's conversio . f the Banvon Investors' funds has nemmnentiv deprived the Banvon Investors of their pro + +558. Based\_upo% Z ..othstein baying initially fled the country after emptying out the trus( accounts. any by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their ro e tile + +. Szfranski actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyan Investors of their property by verifying false bank statements and deal documents and by deceiving the Banvon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +560. Szfranski's actions have directly caused injury and damages to the Banvon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment NMICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages. together with court costs anCuch rther relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 63 - AIDING AND ABUT' RSION (against Onyx Capital t) + +561. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if gestated hereip. + +562. This is a claim for aidi abetting conversion. + +563. As described mo & a ye, the deals in which the\_Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was ing a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance o it e ., Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over thew of the Banvon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,550,000.00 in funds. + +Rothstein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banvon Investors of their property. + +565. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by the Banvon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +566. At all times material hereto, Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +567. Onyx. through its employees while acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banyon Investors of their property byverifyingfalse bank statements and deal documents and by deceiving the Banyon Investors into turnin Rothstein under false pretenses. petty over to + +568. Onyx's actions have directly caused injury and d2ttt a to the Banyon Investors. + +WHEREFORE. LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee/s, ON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS, LP: DAVID VON as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and ICRETST uest judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensato da . together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +re 569. r fs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + +#### COUNT 64 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer. LLFI + +This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +571. As described more fully above, the deals in which the Banyon Investors invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his finn. RR& and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of the Banvon Investors when he absconded with their \$60,550,000.00 in funds. + +572. Rothstein's conversion of the Banvon Investors' funds has permanently deprived the Banvon Investors of their property. + +573. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts. any attempts by the Banyon Investors to make demand upon him for the return of their property would be futile. + +574. Bcrenfeld actively assisted, and provided subs either temporarily or permanently depriving the Banvon sistancc, to Rothstein in their property by providing false auditing documents relating to Banvon and RRAallt,b deceiving the Banvon Investors into turning its property over to Rothstein und falscOtenses. ,,s t + +575. Berenfeld's actions have dime aused injury and damages to the Banvon ~• Investors. + +WHEREFORE, LIND 1., eLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNIVIS\SP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVEN UST, ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRU d' ICRETSCHMAR request judgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER, LLP, for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such furt f relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 65 - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION (against Ti) Bank, N.A.) + +576. plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107121 as if restated herein. + +577. This is a claim for negligent supervision. + +578. As described more fully above, Spinosa. Kerstetter and Caretsky participated, with actual or constructive knowledge, in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. Kerstetter's and Caretskv's participation included, but was not limited to. providing the Banvon Investors with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts, + +579. In reliance on Kerstetter's and Caretskv's representations. . 2009, the Banvon Investors began sending payments to RRA's account at TD Iv funding a total of \$60,090550,000,00. + +580. The Banvon Investors' reliance on Kers Caretskv's representations was reasonable and justified. + +581. TD Bank owed a duty to the B pot actively defrauding depositors by making ftJMe representations in order to trick them into making unsafe deposits into trust ae.ounts that they knew or reasonably should have known were being raided by Rothstein. ktors to ensure that its employees were + +582. I'D Banked its duties to the Banvon Investors because it had actual or constructive nod(cS ao tant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either rfatdule v or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted in the unauthorikVng of investors' deposits, and acted unreasonably by failing to investigate or take corrective action. + +583. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's failure to investigate or take corrective action against Kerstetter or Caretskv. the Banvon Investors have sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, LINDA VON ALLMENT as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST?: D&L PARTNERS. LP?: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and ICRETSC AR request iudgment against TD BANK for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as ur deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXW-66 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein) + +584. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +585. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +586. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Pon ime through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. l + +587. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knowit7Rly rhade material false statements and representations. including but not limited X nting that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had. been ful y funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +590. As a direct and sustained damages. 7 salt of Rothstein's false statements. Razorback has + +WItERER,E, :41PeleRBACK FUNDING. J-LC, requests iudgment against SCOTT ROTFISTEIN( IsiXpensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deans proper. + +#### AS , COUNT ,g(t-V67 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Sninosa) + +591. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +592. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +588. Rothstein intended Razorbacki';C: flis knowingly false representations. + +589. Razorback justifiably relied upon Rothstein's representations to its detriment, + +593. As described more fully above, Rothstei was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +594. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Spinosa knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning= the settlement accounts. + +595. Spinosa intended Razorback to act on his knowingly false ntations. + +596. Razorback justifiably relied upon Spinosa's representations to its detriment. + +597. As a direct and proximate result of S sustained damages. statements, Razorback has + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUND c . requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together th court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### X 168 • FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +tiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 107121 as + +599. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +600. As described more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +601. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Kerstetter knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +602. Kerstetter intended Razorback to act on her knowingly false representati A s. + +603. Razorback justifiably relied upon Kerstetter's representations to i • d ime + +604. As a direct and proximate result of Kerstetter's false state rback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against JENNIFER ICERSI'EITER for compensatory damages. together with. oyrt costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X-X-VI169 - FRAUDULAT PRESENTATION (against Roseanne Caretsky) + +605. Plaintiff incorporates allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. t s " )". + +606. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +t 607. As descria more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, ugh TD Bank. + +n rtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Caretsky knowingly made material false statements an representations including, but not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +609. Carosky intended Razorback to act on her knowingly false representations. + +610. Razorback justifiably relied upon Caretsky's representations to its detriment. + +611. As a direct and proximate result of Caretskv's false statements. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages. to • ether with court costs and fort e relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X210.41170 FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTALTIOI (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +612. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in Darn ,\$) through 444121 og if restated herein. + +613. This is a claim for fraudulent misrep + +614. At all times material hereto. Spin g in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +615. At all times material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +616. At all times mate4W,hereto. Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice residegand branch manager of TD Bank. + +617. A 'bed more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, through 'ID Bank. + +furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. TD Bank, through Spinosa. Kerstetter. and Carecsky, knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +619. ID Bank, through Spinosa. Kerstetter, and Caretslcy. intended Razorback to act on their knowingly false representations. + +620. Razorback justifiably relied upon TD Bank's. through Spinosa's, Kerstetter's, and Cluetsky's, representations to its detriment. + +621. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's, made through SPinosa's Kerstetter's, and Caretsky's, false statements Razorback has sustain • dam + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, uests inst TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages. together with court costs mist such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXIX71 - ULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against George C4. Levin) + +622. Plaintiff incorporates the all s contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +623. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +624. As described more\_lully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and thaw/?rtr Bank. + +625. herance of the Ponzi scheme, Levin knowingly made material false stateme resentations including, but not limited to, representing that the settlement agre,em,eqts purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +626. Levin intended Razorback to act on his knowingly false representations. + +627. Razorback justifiably relied upon Levin's representations to its detriment. + +his limb RRA, and through TD Bank, k 631. As described more fully above. R \ t n w operating a Ponzi scheme through + +632. In furtherance of statements and representations crin scheme, Preve knowingly made material false ut not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements and false ations that other monies had been wired to RRA trust accounts, + +628. As a direct and proximate result of Levin's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LIE. requests iudgment against LEVIN for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 72 - FRAUDULEWSREPRESENTATION (against Preve) + +629. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrqphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. 630. This is a claim for fraudulent misrenrese 14 \ tidy + +633. tended Razorback to act on his knowingly false representations. + +4 As a direct and proximate result of Preve's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +. Ra rback justifiably relied upon Prove's representations to its detriment. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests iudgment against PREVE for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXX NECIAGENT73 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Fwink-SpinesoBanvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC) + +636. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4-03121 as if restated herein. + +637. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +638. At all times material hereto. Levin was acting in the scope of loyment as the chief executive officer of Banyon USVI and BIP. + +639. At all times material hereto, Preve was acting in the his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banvon USVI and BM, + +640. described more full his firm. RRA, and through TI) Bank. + +641. In furtherance of the Ponzi striame, Banvon USVI and BT. through Levin and Preve, knowingly made material false. statements and representations including, but not limited / to. representing that the settlement agrepents purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +642. Banyon U d B1F. through Levin and Preve. intended Razorback to act on their knowingly fal9jepresentations. + +ack justifiably relied upon Banyan USVI's and B1F's. through Levin's and Preve entations to their detriment. + +644. As a direct and proximate result of Banyon USVI's and BIF's, made through Levin's and Preve's, false statements and representations. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP, and BANYON USVI. LLC., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 74 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Michael Szfranski) + +- 645. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 gh 121 as if restated herein. + - 646. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. +- 647. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operati a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. ,14/41%9 , +- 648. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Szfranski knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + - 649. Szfranski intended Razor to act on his knowingly false representations. + - 650. Razorback justifiably tithed upon Szfranski's representations to its detriment. +- 651. As a direct and proximate result of Szfranski's false statements, Razorback has sustained dama + +, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LW, requests inclement against MICHAEL or compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 75 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Onyx Capital Management) + +652. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +653. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. + +654. At all times material hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scone of his emtl as president of Onyx. 4, + +655. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA. and through TD Bank. + +656. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Onyx. throu ski, knowingly material false statements and representations, including, but ' t to, verifying false hank statements and deal documents. + +657. Onyx. through Szfranski, intendeSRak rback to act on its knowingly false representations. + +658. Razorback justifiably relied upon Onyx's. through Szfranski's, representations to its detriment. c) + +659. As a di nd proximate result of Onyx's. made through Szfranski's, false representations, RaOnback as sustained damages. + +< RH. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, reauests judgment against ONYX CAPI GEMENT. for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further rcliibf as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 76 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shedder Sheer, LLP) + +660. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +- sustained damages. relating to Banyan and RRA. +- 661. This is a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. +- 662. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TI) Bank. +- 663. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Berenfeld knowingly made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to. providing false audiiin t documents , + - 664. Berenfeld intended Razorback to act on its knowingly false e ntations. + - 665. Razorback justifiably relied upon Berenfeld's reppeSetthitions to its detriment. + - 666. As a direct and proximate result of Bere statements. Razorback has + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK c S . '\-' LLC, requests judgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER P. for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief Co deems proper. + +#### (cOUNT 77 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (a Spinosa) + +- atntiff incorporates the at c contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated he in. + - 668. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. +- 669. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TI) Bank. + +jntention that Razorback rely on them. 14/ .2 673. Spinosa breached his duty to Razorback by makinefitse representations with the + +670. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Spinosa made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to. supplying investors with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +671. When making the false statements and representations, Spinosa either-knew or -\_ reasonably should have known that they were false. + +672. Spinosa owed Razorback a duty of cam because he knew or bad caon to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on kim to in orm it. + +674. Razorback justifiably relied upon SpittoSp 4 entations ) to its detriment. + +675. As a direct and proximate res It ASkc o pinosa's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORB NG, LLC. requests judgment against a. SPINOSA for compensatory ogether with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### XXXI78 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +intiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through UM 21 as if restated herein. + +677. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +678. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RIZA., and through TD Bank. + +679. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Kerstetter made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +680. When making the false statements and representations. Kerstetter either knew or reasonably should have known thatthey were false. + +681. Kerstetter owed Razorback a duty of care because she know or had mason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on her to inform it. + +682. Kerstetter breached her duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +683. Razorback justifiably relied upon Kers ett rerresentations to its detriment. + +684. As a direct and proximate result tier's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORB SING, LW, requests judgment against JENNIFER KERS tht t ER for compensatory d i Res, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### I179 R NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION c t k) (against + +6 Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +686. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +687. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank, + +688. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Caretskv made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, supplying investors with false bank account statements. + +689. When ante the false statements and representations. Kerstetter eithePQcnew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +690. Caretskv owed Razorback a duty of care because she knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on IC j nn it. + +691. CaretsV breached her duty to Razorback by malsinr false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +692. Razorback justifiably relied upon ntations to its detriment. + +693. As a direct and proximate re ky's false statements. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAW NDING, LW. requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY forompelt tore damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems 7. + +#### XXXII180 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +694. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained gparaaraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +695. This is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +696. At all times material hereto, Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +697. At all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +698. At all times material hereto. Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +699. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +700. in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, TD Bank. ttuough,SpinosTs. Kerstetter, and Caretskv, made material false statements and representations( Including, but not limited to, \*hawing investors false statements of the amounts in- RRA Mist accounts and providing misleading and untrue written assurances concerningthe settlement accounts, + +701. When making the false statements and representations. TD Bank. through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsky. eithe 'w Areasonablv should have known that they were false. + +702. TA Bank owed nzorbacck a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in her and relying on it to inform them. + +703. TD Bank breached its duty to Razorback by making false representations, through Spinosa. Ke c. ett% and Caretskv, with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +dorback justifiably relied upon TD Bank's. through Spinosa's. Kerstetter's, and Caretskv' , representations to their detriment. + +705. As a direct and proximate result of TD Bank's representations. made through Spinosa, Kerstetter, and Caretsk-v. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +# COUNT 81 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (againstypank-SphiosaGeorge G. Levin) + +706. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs th Sit 447121 as if restated herein. + +707. This is a claim for ne fligent misrepresentation. / .1 1% + +708. As described more fully above, Rothstein wa ccrating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +709. In furtherance of the P <1 .1cle material fal tateme ts and representations including, but not li • resenting that the settlement agreements name purchased by investors were real, that therad been fully funded. and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +710. When making the false statements and representations. Levin either knew or reasonably shou aye known that they were false. + +CIn. 711. • owed Razorback a duty of care because he knew or had mason to know that Razorback €p ,acing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform them. + +4: Levin breached his duty to Razorback by making falsejepresentations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +713. Razorback justifiably relied upon Levin's representations to its detriment. + +714. As a direct and proximate result of Levin's false statements. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against + +LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as e Co deems proper. + +#### COUNT 82 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRFSENTATIOO'S (against Preve) + +715. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in para hs)1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +716. This is a claim for negligent misrepresen + +717. As described more fully above, Rgth w operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TD Bank. + +718. In furtherance of the me. Preve made material false statements and representations including, but no i to, representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were t they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a n 'ned schedule. + +719. Vi aaking the false statements and representations. Preve either knew or reasonably ave known that they were false. + +Preve owed Razorback a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform them. + +721. ?few breached his duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +722. Razorback iustifiably relied upon Preve's representations to its detriment. + +723. As a direct and proximate result of Preve's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC. requests judgment against + +PREVE for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 83 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banyon USVI,-LLC) + +724. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragntvhs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +725. This is a claim for negligent misrepresen ttli 'eh + +726. At all times material hereto. Levii tt\* ,tin in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banvon USVI + +727. At all times material hereto. Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banyon US VI and BIE. + +728. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and throw Bank. + +729. erance of the Ponzi scheme, Banyon USVI and BIE, through Levin and Preve, made ma rial false statements and representations including, but not limited to, representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule. + +730. When making the false statements and representations. Banyan USVI and BIE, through Levin and Preve, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +731. Banyon USVI and BIF owed Razorback a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that Razorback was placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +732. Ranyon USVI and BM breached its duty to Razorback by maki false representations. through Levin and Preve. with the intention that Razorback rely on\*em. + +733. Razorback justifiably relied upon Banvon USVI's and BIF's Nevin's and Preve's, representations to its detriment. + +734. As a direct and proximate result of Banvon U made through Levin and Preve Razorback has sustained d d BIF's representa + +t WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. gists judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP, and BANYON USVI compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Coup dedlts proper. + +#### COUNT 84 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (agakst Michael Szfranski) + +735. Plaintiff incorporate.s,the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +736. Tbis claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +escribed more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his rum R . and through TD Bank. + +738. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Szfranski made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents, + +739. When mating the false statements and representations. Szfranski either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +740. Szfranski owed Razorback a duty of care because he knew or had reason to know that, as an independent verifier, Razorback was placing trust and confidence in him and relying on him to inform them. + +741. Szfranski breached his duty to Razorback by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +742. Razorback justifiably relied upon Szfranski's representations to its detriment. + +743. As a direct and proximate result of Szfranski's false s tements. Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 85 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Onyx Capital Management) + +744. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +745. This is a claim fpr negligent misrepresentation. + +746. At'CV • esmaterial hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as 'reside t c f On + +As described more fully above. Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA. and through TD Bank. + +748. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Onyx. through Szfranski, made material false statements and representations, including, but not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +to inform it. 750. Onyx owed Razorback a duty of care because it knew or had \_reason to know that, Atm as an independent verifier. Razorback was placing trust and confidence in it and relying n .C1 + +749. When making the false statements and representations, Onyx, through Szfranski, either knew or reasonably should have known that they were false. + +751. Onyx breached its duty to Razorback by making false representations, through ( 1' Szfranski, with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +752. Razorback justifiably relied upon Onyx's, through Sztranski's, representations t its detriment. + +753. As a direct and proximate result Ac Nr, S,'sr representations, made through Szfranski, Razorback has sustained damages. \ + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBAC . LLC, requests judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for gpptllensMory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deem + +754. incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + +#### COUNT 86 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (antistiierenteld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP) + +is is a claim for negligent misrepresentation. + +756. As described more fully above, Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +757. in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Berenfeld made material false statements and representations including, but not limited to, providing false auditing documents relating to Banvon and RRA. • + +758. When making the false statements and representations. Berenfeld eitherlimew or reasonably should have known that they were false + +759. Berenfeld owed Razorback a duty of care because it knew or had reason to know that, as an independent auditor. Razorback were placing trust and confidence in it and relying on it to inform them. + +760. \$erenfeld breached its duty to Razorback.by making false representations with the intention that Razorback rely on them. + +761. aw rback justifiably relied u iS' d's representations to its detriment. + +762. As a direct and proximat cult Berenfeld's false statements, Razorback has sustained damages. + +WHEREFORE, R RBACR FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECHTER SHEER, LLP, for compensatory damages. together with court costs and her relief as the Court deems proper, + +#### COTO7 IDING AND ABETTIN BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY a ainst S inosa + +Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein, + +764. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +765. Spinosa was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Spinosa was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near futures + +Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +766. Spinosa was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investo to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations t + +767. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistanc tein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty, + +768. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and geT\$Razorhack. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. es ginent against a. ,-, ,t + +1 SPINOSA for compensatory damagcs, together wit co S c and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X.NOW88 - AIDING AND AB 4G BREACII OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +769. Plaintiff incotpongcs the allegatiops contained in paragraphs 1 through 40;121 as if restated herein. + +770. This is a c r aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +771. Kerstetter was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorbac 's rued settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. I •y, and care to Razorback. Kerstetter was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the pear future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +772. Kerstetter was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +773. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty, + +774. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused iniury and damage k. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LW, requests iud menust JENNIFER KERSTETTER for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XXX VI89 • AIDING AND 48ETNG BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, (against R i tskv) + +775. Plaintiff incorporates the allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +776. This is a claim fbr aidin and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +777. Caretsky Nos aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purpided settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, lov Nd are to Razorback. Caretsky was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accorih wining the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future: Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Fttgorback. + +778. Caretskv was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +779. Caretskv actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +780. Caretsky's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LW, requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages, together with court costs further relief as the Court deems proper, co + +#### COUNT X-'4)4441190 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TI) Bank, N.A.) + +781. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 44)7121 as if restated herein. + +1111AmiC 783. At all times material hereto. Spinosa was acting in the scone of .lovment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +782. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +784. At all times material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the pes)of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +785. At all times material hereto, Caretsky w as an assistant vice president and branch managerli c) g iti the scope of her employment + +786. TD Bank was aware that as of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement f deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razdrb Bank was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had wrap/ duties of honesty. loyalty. and care to Razorback, + +787. Tt k was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detppt d was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to + +788. ID Bank, through its employees acting within the scope of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +789. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LW, requests judgment against TD BANK, 4,A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT VA-V11191 - A t t IN AND ABETTING BRE CH a ETD CIARY DUTY against Debra + +790. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs if restated herein. IRMA& + +791. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciarjtduty. + +792. was aware that as trustee of the alto unt where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. was also awar4 tl as tfttstee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an et2Clusive right to collect in the near future, 4' Rothstein had Ili ' duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +793. was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +794. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploit f Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +pr .ORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +1791 7 actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +#### COUNT XX-MaX92 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (againstFrank-Prffelrene Stay) + +796. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407-121 as if restated herein. + +797. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +798. Stay was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account) 14/ rback's F purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary dutiesofhlesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Stay was also aware that as trustee of ttikti attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback bad an exclusive •llect in the near future Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and rback. it + +799. Stay was aware that Rothstein w /.'t cia v exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breachin is fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +800. Stay actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance. to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback, reaches of fiduciary duty. + +801. Stay's actions have dithetiv caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, 1 ABACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against IRENE STAY for co rY damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems p + +#### 93 - AIDIN AND BETT NG BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY a ainst G. Levin + +802. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +804. Levin was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. Levin was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the n \ r future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +805. Levin was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and w s aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +806. Levin actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fid tic c' + +\ 807. Levin's actions have directly caused • damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNSvi , requests iudgment against + +G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, th court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 94 - AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY ingLijaaaH\_Ilreve + +808.n 5eS'ritik incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +809. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, + +810. Preve was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where\_Razerhack's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Preve was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account + +containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, + +Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +811. Fran was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +812. Preve actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +813. Preve's actions have directly caused injury and damage `' u Razed:wick. + +I WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. requests judgment against FRANK PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court c d such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT X1,95 - AIDING AND ABETTING IThEACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Banyon Income Fund, LP, and Banyon USVI, LLCI + +814. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +815. This is a claim Biding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +816. At all tim rial hereto, Levin was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief execuu car of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +81 . 11 times material hereto. Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the ch ling officer or agent of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +818. USVI and BIF were aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where. Razorback's purported settlement Lands were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. Banvon USVI and BIF were also aware that asztrustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +819. Banyon USVI and BIF were aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and were aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +820. Banyon USVI and BM. through its employees acting withjn si3ope of their employment. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance. todcc: n in his financial exploitation of Razor:tack and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +821. Banyon USVI' s and BIF's actions have caused injury and damage to Razorback. \ + +k WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUN , requests judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND, LP, and BANYON L LDE., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief thy Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 96 - G AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Michael Szfranski) + +822. 4incorporates ff the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated + +This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +824. Szfranski was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where the Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. Szfranski was also aware that as trustee of the attorney Court deems proper. WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, ,,,c sts judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages, together ,S% ' S49, ts and such further relief as the + +trust accounts containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback + +825. \$zfranski was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rotbstein was breaching\_ his fiduciary obligations to Razorbask. + +826. Szfranski actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +827. Szfranski's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to Razorback. + +#### COUNT 97 - AI II / brAND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Onyx Capital Management) + +828. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 12.1 as if restated herein. + +.): This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +830. At all times material hereto, Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +831. Onyx was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Onyx was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the nein. future, AWI N Rothsteinkad fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +832. Onyx was aware that Rothstein was financially exploitin "43tors to their detriment, acid was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary o igad. x . RQzorback. + +833. Onyx. through its employees acting within of their employment, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to • ,041 Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. his financial exploitation of + +834. Onyx's actions have directly c andslamage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBAC 1NG LLC, requests judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for 'Tory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court dee + +#### COUN14 AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY ( (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP) + +13', Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +836. This is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +837. Berenfeld was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts where Razorback's purported settlement funds were deposited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care to Razorback. Berenfeld was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust accounts containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty. and care to Razorback. + +838. Berenfeld was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to Razorback. + +839. Berenfeld actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +840. perenfeld's actions have directly caused ini l'illbhamage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUND Et' requests iudgment against BERENFELD SPRITZER SHECI rrER SHER tBk 7 si compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deRtns proper. + +#### COUNT 99 — BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +841. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +842. TK it a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, + +stee of the attorney trust account where Razorback's purported settlement funds osited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to Razorback. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which Razorback had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of hones y, loyalty, and care to Razorback. + +844. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the RRA trust accounts for his personal use. + +845. Rothstein's actions have directly caused injury and damages to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LW. requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COOL ;14100 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY O4 .Ylbsj (against 'ED Bank. N.A.) + +846. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through [(#121 as c) if restated herein. + +847. This is a claim for breach of fiduci Ac 4 % ii + +848. At all times material hereto, Spinosa acting in the scope of his employment t, as \*.- Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +849. At all times material hereto.' Kerstetter was acting in the scone of her employment as an assistant manager of TI) Balk + +850. At all time rial hereto. Caretslcy was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant ident and branch manager of TD Bank. + +8 . orida, a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with its customer under special circum c A'..... ' w here the bank knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to so counsel and inform him. Under the circumstances outlined above, whereby TD Bank knew that Razorback was relying on Spinosa's assurances to Razorback of the precautions in place to prevent improper withdrawals from its account, 'ID Bank was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the fiduciary duties of + +honesty, loyalty, and care. Additionally, where TD Bank knew that Razorback investors were relying on Spinosa's, Kerstetter's and Caretsky's representations that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds. TD Bank was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +852. TD Bank breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its\_employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of Razorback. + +853. TD Bank's actions have directly caused iniury 'dap age to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC '22ment against T13 BANK, N.A.. for compensatory damages. together with coyptSILa such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLII101 - BREA.Ccf1 4)F FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Freak-PeeveGeorge G. Levitt) + +854. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +855. This ita cl r breach of fiduciary duty. + +856. j3 r ling himself out as a co-investor, Levin became a fiduciary of Razorback and owed\* orb k the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care, + +Levin breached his fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback. + +858. Levin's actions have directly caused injury and damage Razorback. + +restated herein. 859. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 t h w,sugh 121 as if CO + +860. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against + +G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 102 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against' Preve) + +861. By holding himself out as a co-investor, Prey a fiduciary of Razorback and owed Razorback the fiduciary duties of honesty. boy t. fare + +862. Preve breached his fiduciary duti bith ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein s f cial exploitation of Razorback. + +863. preve's actions have di y used injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBAW DING, LLC, requests judgment against + +PREVE for compensatory damaites, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### UNT X1,111--.4111ING-AND-411E-7--TING-FRAVD + +#### COUNT 103 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY + +(against Frank-SpinosaBanvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC) + +864. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +865. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +866. At all times material hereto, Levin was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banvon USVI and BIF. + +867. At all times material hereto, Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Bannon USVI and BIF. + +868. Banvon USVI and BIF were fiduciaries of Razorback and owed it the fiduciary duties of honesty. loyalty, and care. + +869. Bannon USVI and BIF breached their fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and provf - substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of Razorback. + +870. Banvon USVI's and BIF's actions a dEly caused injury and damage to \S Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK i D . LLC, requests judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND, LP, and BANYAN LLC., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 104 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \< , (against Michael Szfranski) + +c 871. Pl ' incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if resta + +This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +873. Szfranski. as an independent verifier, was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed it the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +874. Szfranski breached his fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback. + +875. Szfranski's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, irAniests judgment against MICHAEL SZ;FRANSK1 for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 105 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Onyx Capital Management) + +876. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragrapht (ThI th oueh 121 as if restated herein. + +877. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +878. At all times material hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +879. Onyx, as an independent verifier. was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed it the fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care, + +880. Onyx breached its fiduciary duties through the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and providing substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of Razorback. 1 1114, + +881. actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +RE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ONYX CAPIT AGEMENT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 106 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shedder Sheer, LLP) + +882. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +883. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +884. Berenfeld, as an independent auditor, was a fiduciary of Razorback and owed them the fiduciaa\_duties of honesty, loyally. and care. + +885. Berenfeld breached its fiduciary duties by either ignoring or actively assisting and providingsubstantial assistance to Rothstein in higfinancial ex\_ploitatiohr of Razorback. + +886. Berenfeld's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. \_ELC, regpests judgment against BERENFELD SPRTIZER SHECHTER SHEER, or compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court dais p + +#### COUNT 107 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Frank Spinosa) + +887. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 asif restated herein. + +888. This is a cIttn for aiding and abetting fraud. + +889. Abed more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein wa vesting a Ponzi scheme through his firm,RRA, and through TD Bank + +890. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +891. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included, but was not limited to. supplying Razorback with false bank account statements and misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +892. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLI-V108 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +893. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in nava 407121 as if restated herein. + +894. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +895. As described more fully above, the deals Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme thro • RRA, and through TD Bank. + +896. Kerstetter knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +897. Kerstetter actively assisted. and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Kerstetter's assistance included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to Razorback that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial fun n they did not, + +898. ter's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +Wjt RE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. requests judgment against JENNIFER KER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 7a,V109 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Roseanne Caretskv) + +899. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4-07421 as if restated herein. + +900. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +901. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through MBank. + +902. Caretsky knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +903. Caretskyactively assisted, and provided substantial ass' it:cQothsrein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Caretsky' assistance ti, 14 / included, but was not limited to. providing false documentation to \_Razorback trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not. + +904. Caretsky's actions have directl Sid nWry and damage to Razorback, + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBAC G. LLC. requests judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for co ory-damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems prope c .) + +#### - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD 1cr (against TD Bank, N.A.1 + +905. incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4-0;121 as if restated herein, + +906. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +907. As described more hilly above. the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA. and through TD Bank + +908. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment for TD Bank. + +909. At all times material hereto. Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of TD Bank. + +910. At all times material hereto. Carctsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +911. TD Bank knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +912. TD Bank, through Spinosa. Kerstetter. and Caretsky. a tivelv assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploita rback through fraud. TD Bank's assistance included, but was not limited to. providing false documentation to Razorback that the RRA trust accounts contained subslantl01 funds when they did not and supplying investors with misleading and untrue n1t&&tiEances concerning the settlement accounts. + +( Sts\ 913. TD Bank's actions have directl c ed injury and damage to Razorback, + +WHEREFORE, RAZORS V DING. LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A.. for compensatory damaCtoge er with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XLV:11111 - AIDING r ETTING FRAUD (against r ebra + +914. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7)21 as if restated herein, + +915. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +916. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm,RRA, and through TD Bank. + +917. knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +918. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi sclwratAiuding Razorback, through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +919. actions have directly caused iniu ge to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING ".4i/ 0 jests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, toge S il e urt costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT Ali' I ING AND ABETTING FRAUD net PreyeIrene Stay) + +920. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +921. claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +escribed more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and as operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. + +923. Stay knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +924. \$tay actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including Razorback, through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to + +investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +925. Stay's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further rel' Ait • the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 113 - AIDI AND ABETTING ERA 0 (aaainst G. Levin) + +926. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations containedlcaragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +927. This is a claim for aiding and abet + +928. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TD Bank. + +929. Levin knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme, + +930. Levin actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of ck through fraud. Levin's assistance included, but was no( limited to. re that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, that they h funded, and that t a would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedu e\ + +931. Levin's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC, requests judgment against G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 114 - AIDING ANI) ABETTING FRAUD (against Preve) + +932. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +933. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +934. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback irlys were bonus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and Bank. + +935. Preve knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +936. Preve actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Preve's assistance included. but was not limited to, confirming wire transfers into Rothstein's Illt iactounts that he knew were fabricated + +937. Preve's actions have directly caused i rtiry and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against\_ BREVE for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +rir3 \ Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 121 as if restated herein. + +939. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +940. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his Finn. RRA. and through TD Bank. + +#### OONT 1,2611015 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD nst Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVL LLC) + +941. At all times material hereto. Levin was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banyon USVI and BIF. + +942. At all times material hereto. Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or,ggent of Banyon USVI and..B1F. + +943. Eanvon USVI and BIF knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +944. Banyon USVI and BIF, through Levin and Preve, actively d Provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Banyon USVI's and BIF's assistance included, but was not Jimited to. representing that the settlement agreements purchased by investors were real, .fr- ed been fully funded, and that they would be paid out to investors over apredetermitAit le Thi + +945. Banyon USVI's and Brn's a ' iitv directly caused injury and damage to AS Razorback. r + +Ac WHEREFORE. RAZORB DING. LLC, requests iudgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP. and B YON USVI, LI-C., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such furt elief as the Court deems proper. + +#### ?Si OUNT 116 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Michael Szfranski) + +4 cl -946\ aintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +947. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +948. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +- restated herein. +- 952. Plaintiff incorporates the allegati \ s in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + - 953. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. \* 7: +- 954. As described m oL fu e, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a heme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. +- 955. At alLtime 'al hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as resident of knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. Onyx. through Szfranslci, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Onyx's assistance included, but was not limited to. verifying\_false bank statements and deal documents. + - 958. Onyx's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +- 949. Szfranski knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. +- 950. Szfranski actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his + +financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Szfranski's assistance included, but was not limited to, verifying false bank statements and deal documents. + +- 951. Szfranski's actions have directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. requests judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory damages, together with court costs an sudi Nittti;er relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 117 - AWING AND ABE (against Onyx Capital ) + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, requests judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 118 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer. LLP) + +Aisiesc 959. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs gh 121 as f restated herein. + +960. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +961. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firrn.gRA, and through TD Bank. + +962. Berenfeld knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +963. Berenfeld actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of Razorback through fraud. Berenfeld's assistance included, but was not limited to. providing false auditi ments relating to Bannon and RRA, . + +964. Berenfeld's actions bite directly caused injury and damage to Razorback. + +WHEREFORE, RBACK FUNDING, LLC. requests judgment against BERENFELD S1 R SHECHTER SHEER, LLP, for comnensatory damages together with court costs attd suds further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 119 - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +965. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4-03121 as if restated hernia, + +966. This is a claim for conversion. + +967. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000.000.00 in funds. + +968. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +969. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country a emifRing out the trust '..1 accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him \/ f the return of its property would be futile. + +970. Rothstein's actions have directly caus i \g;" c d damages to Razorback. + +requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damag i..., eth yith court costs and such further relief as the WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK Court deems proper. + +if recta 971. plhiaj incorporates the allegations contained jp paragraphs 1 through 407121 as + +#### CO UN 20 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION fratiosa + +This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +973. As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32,000,000.00 in funds, + +Court deems proper. WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. s judgment against \_A, Akt rut SPINOSA for compensatory damages. togetb s , costs and such further relief as the 42\* + +974. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +975. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts. any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +976. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of its property by deceiving Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. , = + +977. Spinosa's actions have directly caused incur mimes to Razorback. + +# COUNT 1.112CDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Jennifer Kerstetter) + +978. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 al i t h + +9. . is is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +980' As described more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating n Ponzi scheme through\_his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback when he absconded with Razorback's \$32.000,000.00 in funds. + +981. Rothstein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +982. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of its4pronerty would be futile. + +983. Kerstetter actively assisted, and provided substantial assis thstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving Razorback of its pro ing Razorback into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. V + +984. Kerstetter's actions have directly caused inj js' mages to Razorback, c + +WHEREFORE. RAZARBACKEJNDING. Slag sts judgment against JENNIFER ICERSTETTER for compensatory damages, to court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper, + +1"14/ + +#### COUNT 1,14122.AlbING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Roseanne Caretskv) + +985. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as ) the scope of his employment as IF, + +furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of Razorback's when he absconded with its 331000.000.00 in funds. + +1033. Rothslein's conversion of Razorback's funds has permanently deprived Razorback of its property. + +1034. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts IN Razorback to make demand unon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +1037. Bannon USVI and B1F, through employees while acting within the scope of , their employment, actively assisted and provided substantial assistance. to Rothstein in either t . . temporarily or permanently eprivi 1 Razorback of its property by representing that the settlement agreements ph ased by investors were real, that they had been fully funded, that they would be paid out to investors over a predetermined schedule, and by deceiving Razorback into turning c 'ts pronerty over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +aivon USVI's and BIF's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to Razorhac + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC. requests judgment against BANYON INCOME FUND. LP. and BANYON USVI, LLC., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +would be futile. 1043. Based upon Rothstein having initially ed the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by Razorback to make demand upon him for the return of their property <V requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damages, th with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XG141213 - AIDjNG A113YABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY against Irene Stay) + +t 1652. Plaintiff i ip tes the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 12I as if restated herein. + +16530 is a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +Stay was aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account where EFMC's purported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. Stay was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. + +1655. Stay was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment, and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +1656. Stay actively assisted. and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +1657. Stayis actions have directly caused injury and\_damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 214 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Andrew Barittl + +N 1658. Plaintiff incorporates the allegatio alined in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +1659. This is a claim for aidin abetting breach of fiduciary duty. + +1660. Barnett was aw purported settlement funds w de sited, Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. B was also aware that as trustee of the attorney trust account containing the ftdllls to ch BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future, Rothstein ha ary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. stee of the attorney trust account where BFMC's + +Barnett was aware that Rothstein was financially exploiting the investors to their detriment. and was aware that Rothstein was breaching his fiduciary obligations to BFMC. + +1662. Barnett actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC and his breaches of fiduciary duty. + +1663. Barnett's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC, + +WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests judgment against ANDREW BARNETT for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 215 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Scott Rothstein) + +1664. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 147121 as if restated herein. Yy + +1665. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +1666. As trustee of the attorney trust account where B urported settlement funds were deposited. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of alto, and care to BFMC. Additionally, as trustee of the attorney trust account contain g the funds to which BFMC had an exclusive right to collect in the near future. Rothstein had fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care to BFMC. + +1667. Rothstein breached his fiduciary duties by raiding the RRA trust accounts for his personal use. + +1668. Rothstein's actions have directly caused iniury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW. requests iudgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT XCVM216 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +1669. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +1670. This is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. + +1671. At all times material hereto. Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of TD Bank. + +1672. In Florida. a bank assumes a fiduciary duty with its customer uncle; special circumstances where the bank knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing teust l and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank to so counsel and inform-lum. Under the f li Y circumstances outlined above, whereby TD Bank knew that BFMC was , g on Spinosa's assurances to BFMC of the precautions in place to prevent impropei=withdrawals from its account, TD Bank was a fiduciary of BFMC and owed BFMC fiduciary duties of honesty, loyalty, and care. + +AS S 9 1673. TD Bank breached its fiduciary rough the actions of its employees by either ignoring or actively assisting and substantial assistance to Rothstein in its financial exploitation of BFMC. + +1674. TD Bank's actio have ' tly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE. A compensatory 11FMC , 34,.. / TMENT, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N ., for ages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court dee r ., + +#### OUNT XCIX217 • AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Spinosa) + +16 5. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 1-0;121 as if restated herein. + +1676. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +I + +1677. As described mom fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank, + +1678. Spinosa knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +1679. Spinosa actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. Spinosa's assistance included not limited to. supplying BFMC with false bank account statements and misleaditik4nd untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +1680. Spinosa's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, ent against SPINOSA for compensatory damages, together with god c and such further relief as the Court deems proper, + +#### Bank, N.A.) COUNT 6218 - AID S ICBETTING FRAUD + +1681. Plaintiff incorporat legations contained in paragraphs I through -10-7121 as if restated herein. + +1682. This is a c qi, aiding and abetting fraud. + +1683. At more fully above, the deals in which Razorback invested were bogus and Rothster tva perating a Ponzi scheme through hisfirm, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting in the scone of his employment for TD Batik. + +1685. TD Bank knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +1686. TD Bank. through Spinosa, actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. TD Bank's assistance + +included, but was not limited to, providing false documentation to BFMC that the RRA trust accounts contained substantial funds when they did not and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +1687. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC, requests judgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. C + +L) + +iS 4)C) + +? S" + +6 C)\* + +r ic S + +#### COUNT 61219 • AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against David Boden) + +1688. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40;121 as if restated herein. + +1689. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +1690. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC iny ere RUS and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and tlj gh I ank, + +1691. Boden knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +1692. Roden actively assisted. and provided substan financial exploitation of BFMC through fraud. Boden's to, making assurances to BFMC that there were safeguards r lace to protect its deposits, all the time knowing that no such safeguards existed, tance, to Rothstein in his ncludecl. but was not limited + +1693. Boden's actions have direqg auseil injury and damage to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE. BFMC RN SfA4ENT, LLC, requests judgment against DAVID BIDDEN for compensatory dal ./ together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +if Debra tiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through -107121 as erein. + +# AND ABETTING FRAUD + +1695. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +1696. As described more fully above. the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Pont scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TD Bank. + +1697. knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +1698. actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including BFMC. through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to • vestors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive know at the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +1699. actions have directly caused injury and dama BFMd. + +SiiW REFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT. LLC. regu 'ud merit against DEBRA for compensatory damages. together with co Court deems proper. such further relief as the + +#### COUNT GHT22 (against ETTING FRAUD + +1700. Plaintiff incorporates the contained in paragraphs 1 through 40;121 as if restated herein. + +1701. This is a claim f g and abetting fraud. + +1702. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was aperatinrt a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TD Bank. + +1703 knew of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme. + +Stay actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of the investor victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including BFMC. through fraud by furnishing false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors in order to induce them to invest despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the investments were a Ponzi scheme. + +1705. Stay's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to BFMC, + +WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT. LLC, requests judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 222 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (against Andrew Barnett) + +1706. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraph restated herein. ACL 121 as if + +1707. This is a claim for aiding and abetting fraud. + +1708. As described more fully above, the deal cFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his finn, RRA, and through TD Bank. + +1709. Barnett knew of Rothstein's ulent scheme. + +1710. Barnett actively assisted provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in his financial exploitation of all of victims of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, including BFMC. through fraud. Bamett's assistance included, but was not limited to, supplying BFMC with false information about the identity of the defendant who was purportedly funding the settlement despite having actual or constructive knowledge that the settlements were part of a Ponzi schemu + +letBamett's actions have directly caused iniury and damage to BFMC. EFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT, LW, requests iudgment against ANDREW BARNEY!' for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT GIV223 - CONVERSION (against Scott Rothstein) + +1712. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4W121 as if restated herein. + +1713. This is a claim for conversion. + +1714. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC inv °ens and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein exercised unauthorized the property of BFMC when he absconded with BFMC's \$2.4 in funds. Bank. In and control over + +1715. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's fund\ property. entiv deprived BFMC of its + +"(Citv 1716. Rased upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +1717. Rothstein's actions ha directly caused injury and damages to BFMC, + +WHEREFORE, BFIVIC INVESTMENT. LW, requests judgment against SCOTT ROTHSTEIN fg nnenstory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court d m + +#### COUNT GV224 - AIDING &BETTING CONVERSION (against Spinosa) + +1718. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4437121 as if restated herein. + +1719. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +1720. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with D3's \$2.400.000.00 in funds, + +1721. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BPMC of its property. + +....... 1722. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country er e vmg out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for f its property would be futile. + +1723. \$pinosa actively assisted, and provided Gat assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving B il4 its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein and false pretenses. + +1724. Spinosa's actions hay used iniury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE. BFM NT. LLC. requests judgment against A. SPINOSA for compensatory dam. ges, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper.- + +#### COUNT 0225 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against T1) Bank, N.A.) + +Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 407121 as if restated herein. + +1726. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +1727. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TO Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with BFMC 52.400.000.00 in funds. + +1728. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +1729. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emplynitout trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return t fitsproperty would be futile. + +1730. At all times material hereto Spinosa was acting of his employment for TD Bank. + +1731. employment, 4\ TD Bank. through its employees wiu a 'nig within the scope of their actively assisted. and provided • 1 assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC property by allowing Rothstein to make unauthorized withdrawals of its funds and by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +1732. TD Bank's actions have directly caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT, requests judgment against TD BANK N.A., for compensatory -damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CVII226 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against David Boden) + +1733. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4O7121 as if restated herein. + +1734. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +1735. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm, RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +1736. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +1737. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +1738. Boden actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of dt ' sronerty , by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pret Ses. + +1739. Boden's actions have caused injury and damages to BFMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMI NT, LW, requests judgment against DAVID BODEN for compensatory dams es, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COISICVI11227 - AIDING AND ABE G CONVERSIO (against Debra + +Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4W121 as if restated herein. + +1741. This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +1742. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his Finn, RRA, and through 'ID Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400.000.00 in funds. + +1743. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +1744. Based upon Rothstein\_having initially fled\_tfte country after emptyinfoutihe trust - ' accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its nerty would Sl iile L + +1745. actively assisted, and provided substantialiss stance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of ,.'i ") proy by deceiving BFMC into nsr\ turning its property over to Rothstein under false prete + +1746. actions have directly c used Injury and damages to BFMC. ..\,, + +1747. WHEREFORE, BFMC INV NT. LW. requests judgment against DEBRA for compensatory damtf, e1Rer with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CIX228liIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION (against Andrew-Battnettlrene Stay) + +1748. POlticr eincorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4W121 as restated + +This is a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +1750. As described more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rothstein was operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA, and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of D3 when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +1751. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +1752. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts, any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +n atall"\- 1753. Stay actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceiving BFMC into turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +1754. Stay's actions have directly caused injury ancidanntges to BFMC. + +1755. WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTMENT. ILC, requests judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages, together with eqpc.o sts and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +1756. Plaintiff incorpo restated herein, e allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if + +1757. a claim for aiding and abetting conversion. + +# COUNT 229 - AI 'QM ABETTING CONVERSION ;first Andrew Barnett} + +1758 escribed more fully above, the deals in which BFMC invested were bogus and Rot tlwas operating a Ponzi scheme through his firm. RRA. and through TD Bank. In furtherance of the Ponzi scheme, Rothstein exercised unauthorized dominion and control over the property of BFMC when he absconded with BFMC's \$2,400,000.00 in funds. + +1759. Rothstein's conversion of BFMC's funds has permanently deprived BFMC of its property. + +1760. Based upon Rothstein having initially fled the country after emptying out the trust accounts. any attempts by BFMC to make demand upon him for the return of its property would be futile. + +1761. Barnett actively assisted, and provided substantial assistance, to Rothstein in either temporarily or permanently depriving BFMC of its property by deceivin Th'MC into Ass 7 turning its property over to Rothstein under false pretenses. + +1762. flarnett's actions have directly caused injury and damag tb BPMC. + +WHEREFORE, BFMC INVESTMENT. LLC, requests itt against ANDREW BARNS I' for compensatory damages, together with cou 'S" c o) such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT GX230 - NEGLI UPERVISION (against TO Rants N.A.) + +1763. Plaintiff incorporates the go ;Contained in paragraphs I through 443121 as if restated herein. + +1764. This is a claim f ligent supervision. + +1765. As descri fully above. Spinosa participated, with actual or constructive knowledge, in in's Ponzi scheme. Spinosa's participation included, but was not limited to, providing\_ BAC with false information concerning the amounts deposited in RRA trust accounts and supplying investors with misleading and untrue written assurances concerning the settlement accounts. + +1766. In reliance on Spinosa's representations, on October 15, 2009. BFMC wired \$2,400,000.00 to RRA's TD Bank account. + +1767. BFMC's reliance on Spinosa's representations was reasonable and justified. + +1768. TD Bank owed a duty to BFMC to ensure that its employees were not actively defrauding depositors by making false representations in order to trick them into making unsafe deposits into trust accounts that they knew or reasonably should have known were being raided by Rothstein. + +1769. TD Bank breached its duties to BFMC because it had actual or constructive notice that its assistant manager and assistant vice president and branch manager were either fraudulently or negligently participating in a scheme which resulted • &authorized raiding of investors' deposits, and acted unreasonably by failing to investigate or talre corrective action, + +1770. As a direct and proximate result of TD corrective action against Spinosa, BFMC has sustained d a , 7 to investigate or take + +WHEREFORE. BFMC INVESTM N.A., fur compensatory damages. togethe a% deems proper. 4 ..." uests judgment against TD BANK costs and such further relief as the Court + +#### C014 1- CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Scott Rothstein) + +1771. Plaintiffs in te the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4-07121 as if restated herein + +1772. 3is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1773. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretslcy, Roden, M. Barnett. Stay. Preve. and-Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx, Banvon USVI. BIF, and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme, In doing so. Rothstein acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of his and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate + +investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than his own blatant fabrications. + +1774. Rothstein, Spinosa Kerstetter. Caretsky, Boden, MN, Barnett. Stav. Preve, and-,Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banvon USVI, DIP, and Bercnfeld acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly un d and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1775. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstett , Boden. 13amett, Stay, Prey°, and-Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, On SW. BIF, and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1776. There was a meeting of the een and among Rothstein, Spinosa. Kerstetter, Caretskv. Boden, =, Barne, ve, Szfranski. Levin, TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon USVI. MP, and Berenfeld, o individuals and entities, both known and unknown. to commit the unlawful acts all he '2 This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and c2ntinue cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1777. Rothstein and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused iniury and damage to Plaintiffs + +w RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC;; D3 CAPITAL CLUB. LLC-: BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC-: LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VQN ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST-LD&L PARTNERS. LP-: DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against SCOTT + +ROTHSTEIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CX1I232 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against TD Bank, N.A.) + +1778. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +1779. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1780. At all times material hereto. Spinosa was acting in the scope of his employment as Regional Vice President of T.D. Bank. + +1781. Ai all times material hereto, Kerstetter was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant manager of T.D. Bank. + +1782. At all times material hereto. Caretsky was acting in the scope of her employment as an assistant vice president and branch manager of TD Bank. + +1783. As described mom\_fUllv above, TD Bank, acting through its employees, and Rothstein, Baden, M, Barnett, end-Stay. Preve. Szfranski, Levin. Onyx, Banvon USVI, RIF, and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. TD Bank acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1784. TD, through its employees, and Rothstein. Boden, Barnett, end-Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, + +as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs, + +1785. The overt acts of TD Bank. Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretsky. Boden, la Barnett, Stay. Preve, Szfranski, Levin. Onyx, Banvon USVI. BIF. and Neve were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1786. There was a meeting of the minds between and among TD Bank. through its employees, and—Rothstein. Roden, Barnett. Stay. Preve. Szfranski, Levin. Onyx, Banvon USVI. BIF. and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, boftrknown and unknown, c to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to com it these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs datna,ges)0-2 + +1787. TD Bank's and its co-conspirators' duct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBA \*IN G, LLC-; D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LL,Cv• BFMC -4... INVESTEMEWINVES LINDA VON ALLMEN- as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY U • L PARTNERS, LPT: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VONAALL N LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request iudgment against TD BANK, N.A., for compensatory damages, together with courtsosts and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT OkH12.33 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Spinosal + +1788. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +1789. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1790. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Roden, M, Barnett, Stay. Preve, and-Szfranski. Levin. TD Bank, Onyx. Banyon USVI, BW. and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme, In doing so. Spinosa acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments w no moie than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1791. Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretsky, Roden, ViUegas, Barnett, Stay, Preve, and—Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx. Banyon USW& B . and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as described supra. according tp a prektermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purgose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1792. The overt acts f Ro Spinosa. Kerstetter. Caretsky, Boden, Barnett. Stay. Preve. and-Szfran&TL Levin. TD Bank. Onyx. Banyon USVI, BW, and Berenfeld were contrary to law.\_ as staled above. + +1793. -There pas a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Catetsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. Onyx, Banyon USVI. BM, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful-acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1794. Spinosa's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused iniury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC:: D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLCi• BFMC 1144LES-WsMBN-TINVESTMENT, LLC-: LINM VON ALLMEN; as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST:: D&L PARTNERS. LPT; DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request inclement against SPINOSA for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT GNIV234 - CONSPIRACY (against Jennife ejstettcrj + +1795. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 4447121 as if restated herein. + +1796. This is a claim for vil conspiracy. + +1797. As described me fully above. Rothstein, Spinosa. Kerstetter, Caretskv. Roden, Barnett. Stay. and-Szfranski. Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banvon USVI. BIF, and Berenfeld know' acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. K e acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the otl tem\conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no mom than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1798. Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretskv, Baden, a, Barnett, Stay, Preve and—.Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx. Banyan USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld acted in their + +ALLMEN DYNASTY TR WHEREFORE RA LLC;; D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC-; BFMC INVES-TEMENTINV : LINDA VON ALLMEN- as Trustee of the VON St;D&L PARTNERS. LP?: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against JENNIFER. KERSTETTER for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### Amended Complaint + +respective roles, as described above supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors. including Plaintiffs. + +1799. The overt acts of Rothstein. Spinosa. Kerstetter. Caretskv, Boden. Barnett. Stay. Preve. end-Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Bevnfeld l were contrary to law, as stated above. %, + +1800. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden. M, Barnett, Stay, Preve, S7franslci, Levin. TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon USVI. BIF. and Berenfeld. and other individuals I d entities, both known and unknown to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This con v to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plai + +1801. Kerstetter's and her co ' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +#### COUNT CXV235 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Roseanne Caretskv) + +fabrications by Rothstein. 1804. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Roden, a , Barnett, Stay, Preve, and-Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon Sri, and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. Caretskv acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false imprlssion of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments 'Acre no more than blatant r + +1805. Rothstein. Spinosa. Kerstetter, and Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. Onyx respective roles, as described supra,t o accepted plan of action all f including Plaintiffs. /S9 oden, Barnett. Stay. Preve, SW. RIF. and Berenfeld acted in their a predetermined and commonly understood and se of obtaining substantial funds from investors, + +1806. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa. Kerstetter. Caretsky. Boden. Barnett Sta ve atal-Szfranski. Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF. and Berenfeld as sta ed above. + +1802. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 447121 as if restated herein. + +1803. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1:'c There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretsky. Boden, . Barnett, Stay. Prove, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown + +to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. Tis conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1808. Caretskv's and her co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +11 WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING LIE-. CAPITAL CLUB FMC INV-ESTEMENTINVESTMENT. LLC;; LINDA VON ALLMEN; as Trusteed the VON as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON rustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETS uest judgment against ROSEANNE CARETSKY for compensatory damages 'th court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +### COUNT cx-stail§tm CONSPIRACY (aest David Baden) + +1809. Plaintiffs incorporat negations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein, + +1810. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1811. Ak(dsibeeMore fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Roden, tay. Prove, and-Szfranski. Levin. TI) Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfelr ngly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In r• doing so. Roden acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1812. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, [REDACTED], Barnett, Stay, Preve, and Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as described *supra*, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1813. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, [REDACTED], Barnett, Stay, Preve, and Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1814. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, [REDACTED], Barnett, Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1815. Boden's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC; D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC; BFMC INVESTMENT INVESTMENT, LLC; LINDA VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and [REDACTED] KRETSCHMAR request judgment against DAVID BODEN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT CXVII237 CIVIL CONSPI (against Deb + +1816. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 403121 as if restated herein. + +1817. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +ME, Barnett. Stay. Prove, and-Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank. Onyx. B I. BIF, and 1818. As described more fully above. Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. a% ky, oden, ae Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the egal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, acted with full knowledge and awareness ivities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the ssion of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact.tS vd9ttnents were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein, ..,"\, + +1819. Rothstein. Spinosa. Ke C tsky. Boden, Barnett. Stay, Preve and—Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. anvon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action r the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plainti + +18 t overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden. Dame 'reve and-Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banvon USVL BIF. and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1821. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden, M, Barnett, Stay, Preve. Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyan USV1, BIF, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1822. and her co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damace to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC;: D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC-• BFMC INV-BST-EMENTINVESTMENT, LLG: LINDA VON as Tmstee of VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST;: D&L PARTNERS, LP:: DAVID VO , as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALlaE rustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and DEBRA request judgment against for compensatory damages court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT aW111.238- VIL CONSPIRACY (=dust Andrew Barnettj + +1823. Plaintiffs incorpora N.4ations contained in paragraphs 1 through 40-7121 as if restated herein. + +1824. This is a claim Or civil conspiracy. + +1825. ksCscribei more fully above. Rothstein. Spinosa. Kerstetter. Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Stay, Prove, and-Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank. Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIF. and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1826. Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter, Carctskv. Boden, M, Barnett. Stay, Preve, and—Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banvon USVI, MR and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as described supra. according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from ipvestors, including Plaintiffs. + +1827. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, la Barnett, Stay. Preve, and-Szfranski. Levin. TD Bank. Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1828. There was a meeting of the minds betweett alt ainong Rothstein, Spinosa Kerstetter. Caretskv, Boden. Barnett, Stay Xr 4nski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI. BW. and Berenfeld, and other i i u and entities, both known and unknown, jo commit the unlawful acts alleged herein nspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to s tiffs damages. + +1829. J3arnett's and hi e rators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFO'.- RBACK INC D3 CAPITAL CLUB C-: BFMC TMENT -: LINDA VON ALLMEN- as Trustee of the VON AL T TY TR ;; D&L PARTNERS, LP;; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DA VON ALLMEN LIVIN UST' VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the A VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against ANDREW BARNEIT for compensatory damages. together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT QiI;c239 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Preve) + +1830. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 444121 as jf restated herein. , • I + +1831. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1832. As described more fully above, Rothstein. SpitieenSvi sat Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Barrett, Stay, Preve, tanl-Szfranski. Levin k. Onyx, Banvon USVI, RIF, and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Preve acted with full knowAe end awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators w Nde, amd to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opporaties when in fact the investments were no more than V blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1833. Rothstein. SPKt pi osa. Kerstetter. Caretskv. Boden. M, Barnett. Stay, Preve, and-Szfranski, Le Bank. Onyx, Banyon USVI, BM, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, sena, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted t I e o ett on all for the Pumose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, includinr tiffs, + +\ ;14/,, 1834. The overt acts of Rothstein, SpitwaaSpinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv. Boden, a , Barnett. Stay. Preve, atitl-Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. Onyx. Banyon USVI, BIP, and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1835. Them was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, 8pinezaSpinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett, Stay. Preve, Szfranslci, Levin, TD Bank. Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both la-town and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit \_ these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damaget—\\., + +il 7 + +1836. Preve's and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused ininry and damage to Plaintiffs. + +WHEREFORE RAZORBACK FUNDING LLC-: D3 CAM' CLUB, LLCT. BFMC INNT5S-TEMEN4INVESTMENT, LI-Cf, LINDA VON ALIAS%) as Trustee of the VON -"•\ ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST,. D&L PARTNERS. LP,: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of N\ the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against PREVE for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 240 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY against Irene Stay) + +1837. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +1838. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1839. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretslcy, Boden, M, Barnett. Stay. Preve. Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon USVI. BE and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Stay acted with MI knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the + +other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein + +1840. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden, Emmett. n Sta Preve, Szfranski. Levin, TD Bank. Onyx. Banyon USVI. BIF. and Berenfeld acted in r the roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly unde d accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds fritt )ors. including Plaintiffs. - + +1841. The overt acts of Rothstein. Spinosa, ICe i 7 tslcy. Boden, Barnett, Stay. Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Ons SVI, BIF. and Berenfeld were contrary to law. as stated above. + +1842. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv.Boden, Villeg . Bart, Stay. Preve, Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx, .A. Banyon USW, BIT, and Bere it d. er individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful a a leg erein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1843. Stu's mid her co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs. 14/ 1Iii,,,j + +WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC: D3 CAPITAL CLUB. LW: BFMC INVESTMENT. LW: LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN + +LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR reauest judgment against IRENE STAY for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 241 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Michael Szfranski) + +1844. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 Litt l es if restated herein. + +1845. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +CO + +1846. As described more fully above, Rothstein, Spi rstetter, Caretskv. Baden, Barnett. Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin. TD AS 400in . Banyon USVI, INF. and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market picrnp ent the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. Szfranski acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when\_ in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Rothstein. + +1847. Rothstein, \$pincisa, Kerstetter. Caretsky. Roden, , Barnett,. Stay. Preve, Szfranski, LevuV Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as dese sum. according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan dfant in all for the pumose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1848. The overt acts of Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretsky, Bolen. Villegas, Bamett, Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIF, and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +Court deems proper. WHEREFORE. RAZORBACK FUNDING. LLC; D3 CAPITAL CLUB. LW; BFMC INVESTMENT. LLC; LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the\_yON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN. as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: ANN VON ALLÅNV. ig Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KRETSCHMAR request judgment against MICHAEL SZFRANSKI for compensatory dan ga. i ,) ether with court costs and such further relief as the + +1849. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden, =, Barnett. Stav, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. Onvx, Banyon USVI, B1F, and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt actz proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +1850. Szfranski and his co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused inituli and damage to Plaintiffs. + +## CO 9242 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY fagainst Onyx Capital Management) + +1851. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +1852. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1853. At all times material hereto. Szfranski was acting in the scope of his employment as president of Onyx. + +1854. As described more fully above. Onyx, through Szfranski, and Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretsky, Boden.~, Barnett. Stav, Preve, Levin. TD Bank, Banyon USVI. BIF, + +and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so, Onyx acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabricgtions by Rothstein. + +1855. Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, CaretsIcy. Roden, Barnett, Stay, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon USV1, BIF. and Berenfeltacted ia their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substan idl M g)from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1856. The overt acts of Rothstein, erstetter, Caretskv. Boden, Barnett, Stay. Freve, Szfranski. Levin. TD vx. Banvon USVL MR and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1857. There was a m ng 0 minds between and among Onyx, through Szfranski and Rothstein, Spinosa. erstett aretsky, Boden, M. Barnett, Stay. Preve, Levin, TD Bank, Banvon USW, Ell and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts alleged herein. This conspiracy to commit these unlawful overt acts proximately caused and continues to cause Plaintiffs damages. + +Onyx's and its co-conspirators' conduct has directly caused injury and damage to Plaintiffs + +WHEREFORE, RAZORBACK FUNDING. LW; D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LW; BFMC INVESTMENT, LLC; LINDA VON ALLMEN as Trustee of the VON ALLNIEN DYNASTY TRUST: D&L PARTNERS. LP: DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN. VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST: and ICRETSCIIIVIAR request judgment against ONYX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 243 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY facainst G. Levin) + +1859. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paraglanhs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +1860. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +1861. As described more fully above, RotliCht 'nom Kerstetter, Caretslcy, Boden, M, Barnett. Stay. Preve, Szfranski, Levin. TD Bank, Onyx, Banyon USVI. BM. and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. Levin acted with full knowledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-conspirators were designed to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment opportunities ivbettin fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by ( 7- Rothstein. + +1862k Rothstein, Sninosa. Kerstetter, Caretsky, Roden, Barnett, Stay. Preve Szfransti vin TD Bank. Onyx. Banvon USVI, BIP, and Berenfeld acted in their respective roles, as described supra, according to a predetermined and commonly understood and accepted plan of action all for the purpose of obtaining substantial funds from investors, including Plaintiffs. + +1863. The overt acts of Rothstein, Spinosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden. ffl , Barnett. Stav, Preve, Szfranski, Levin, TD Bank, Onyx. Banvon USVI. BW. and Berenfeld were contrary to law, as stated above. + +1864. There was a meeting of the minds between and among Rothstein. Sninosa, Kerstetter, Caretskv, Boden. Barnett. Stay, Preve, Szfranski. Levin. TD Bank. Onyx, Banvon USW, BI)'.'', and Berenfeld, and other individuals and entities, both known and unknown, to commit the unlawful acts allezed herein. This conspiracv to commit diese unlawful overt acts proximateiv caused and continues to tause Plaintiffs damages. \_ + +1865. Levin's and his co-conspirators' conduct has S'1( direclly caused iniurv and damage to + +WHEREPORE, RAZORBACK FUNDIS/ 133 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC; BFMC "a. INVESTMENT, LLC; LINDA VON ALLMEN a Trustee of the VON ALLMEN DYNASTY TRUST; D&L PARTNERS, LP; DAVID VON ALLMEN, as Trustee of the DAVID VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; ANN VQN ALLMEN, as Trustee of the ANN VON ALLMEN LIVING TRUST; and KREISCHIVIAR request iudgment against G. LEVIN for compensatory damages, together with court costs and such further relief as the Court deems proper. + +#### COUNT 244 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC + +1866. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 121 as if restated herein. + +1867. This is a claim for civil conspiracy. + +#### Amended Complaint + +1868. At all times material hereto, Levin was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief executive officer of Banyon USV1 and 13W. + +1869. At all limes material hereto, Preve was acting in the scope of his employment as the chief operating officer or agent of Banyon USVI and BM, + +1870. As described more fully above. Banyon USVI and B1F, through jfPlftployces, arid Rothstein. Spinosa, Kerstetter. Caretsky, Boden, M, Barnett. Stay, Szfranski, TD Bank, Onyx, and Berenfeld knowingly acted in concert to market and implement the illegal Ponzi scheme. In doing so. Banvon USVI and BIF acted with ful wledge and awareness that the activities of Rothstein and the other co-consnira WdAi 'Riled to give the false impression of the existence of legitimate investment p ' 44cu i es when in fact the investments were no more than blatant fabrications by Roths k a 60 3 3 1 CR-COHN + +18 U.S.C. §1962(d) 18 U.S.C. §1956(h) 18 U.S.C. §1349 18 U.S.C. §1343 18 U.S.C. § 2 18 U.S.C. §1963 18 U.S.C. §982(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. §981(a)(1)(C) MAG1STI:ATi: J Dcia Maga' + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +### ON + +iI + +![](_page_297_Picture_10.jpeg) + +The United States Attorgeyaz s that, at all times relevant to this Information: + +### N14/ , ENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +1. Scott W. Rpt ein was an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Cbif Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. + +Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and elsewhere. The law firm employed approximately seventy (70) attorneys and engaged in the practice of law involving a wide range of specialties, including labor and employment law. + +#### COUNT 1 (Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1962(d)) + +- 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. + +#### THE ENTERPRISE + +- 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeld( and Adler, P.A. (hereinafter referre to as RRA) was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and constitute r terprise as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(4). Th C and the activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce. I engaged in, + +#### THE RACKETEERING CONSP + +- 3. From in or about 2005 and continuing Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the de r about November 2009, in the + +#### SCOTT W. ROTH TE1N, + +being a person employed by and associated with the Enterprise described above, which was engaged in, and the activities of which and aL ected, interstate and foreign commerce, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, agree, - persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to violate Title 18, United Code, Section 1962(c); that is, to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly,in' conduct of the affairs of the Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961(1) and (5), as set forth herein \ — below at paragraph 4. + +#### THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY + +4. The pattern of racketeering activity as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961(1) and 1961(5), through which the defendant and his co-conspirators agreed to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the Enterprise consisted of multiple acts indictable under the laws of the United States, namely: + +- i. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341 (mail fraud); +- ii. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (wire frau +- iii. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(W ring of monetary instruments); +- iv. Title 18, United States Code, Secjon L257 (engaging in monetary transactions); and +- v. Title 18, United States Code,' 1956(h) (conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and e It i onetary transactions. + +#### K THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE RACKETEERING ACTIVITY + +5. The principal purpose of the racketeering conspiracy was to generate money for the defendant and his co-conspirators through the operation of the Enterprise and through various criminal activities, including mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. + +6. The defendant and his co-conspirators agreed to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through its base of operation at the offices of RRA. The conspirators also utilized other locations t the objectives of the Enterprise. RRA was utilized by the defendant and his coconspirato to unlawfully obtain approximately \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud in connection with an investment scheme commonly known as a "Ponzi" scheme, in which new investors' funds are utilized to pay previous investors in the absence ofany underlying security, legitimate investment vehicle or other commodity. + +#### THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS + +7. The roles of the conspirators were as follows: + +A. Defendant SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN was a shareholder, Chairman and CEO of RRA. + +Through his position at RRA, defendant ROTHSTEIN promoted, managed, an ervised the administration of the Enterprise by fraudulently inducing investors throui e use of false statements, documents, and computer records to (1) loan money to p wers based upon fraudulent promissory notes and fictitious bridge loans, and (2) invest ased upon anticipated pay-outs from purported confidential settlement agreemen ad been reached between and among certain individuals and business entities. Th agreements were falsely presented as having been reached between putative plaint' cases and putative defendants based upon the forbearance of civil claims in sexual t and/or whistle-blower cases. + +B. Other conspirators, o unknown to the United States Attorney, agreed with one another and with defend RO TEIN to take actions to further the operation and success of the "Ponzi" scheme, ling presenting the aforesaid investments to potential investors as legitimate inv t vehi es, when in fact they were not; fraudulently inducing investors to place funds into r estment vehicles by making material misstatements of facts as set forth below; assuri tial investors and investors that sufficient funds existed to pay returns on these investments, when in fact such funds did not exist; creating, and transferring funds into and from, various accounts at financial institutions in order to further the unlawful scheme; and realizing profits from the operation of the Ponzi scheme through the acquisition of money generated as proceeds from the scheme and through the acquisition of real and personal property. + +## MANNER AND MEANS OF THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY + +8. It was part of the conspiracy that the defendant agreed that a conspirator would commit at least two acts of racketeering activity in the conduct of the affairs of the Enterprise. + +9. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators initiated the cMmlpal conduct alleged in the instant Information in order to personally enrich themselves an ai supplement i the 0 income and sustain the daily operation of RRA. + +10. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators fra ule)ntly solicited investors to loan money based upon promissory notes and bridge lo qom purported clients of RRA. Defendant ROTHSTEIN falsely alleged that clients o equested short-term financing for undisclosed business deals. Defendant ROTH sely alleged that the purported clients were willing to pay high rates of retum on loans oliecteoti by Defendant ROTHSTEIN. In fact, defendant ROTHSTEIN was aware that no succ or requests for business financing actually existed. fr,, N y i + +11. Defendant RoaltSTEIN and other co-conspirators participated in an investment \--} scheme commonly known,-"Ponzi" scheme. The "Ponzi" scheme involved the sale of purported confidential settle intst agreements , in sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower cases. The potential investors e y defendant ROTI 'STEIN and other co-conspirators that confidential settlement agree re available for purchase. The purported settlements were allegedly available in amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars and could be purchased at a discount and repaid to the investors at face value over time. + +12. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized the offices of RRA and the offices of other co-conspirators to convince potential investors of the legitimacy and success of the law firm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity. + +13. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made false and misleading statements and omissions which were intended to fraudulently induce potential investors into purchasing the confidential settlements. + +Awalc 14. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made the 'ng fraudulent representations to potential investors in order to induce them to purcha.sa rted settlements: + +- A. That the purported settlements were highly conf ntial in order to protect the reputation of the company authorizirtg ttlement and the executives involved; +- B. That the plaintiffs in the INS sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower cases preferred sett e cases in order to avoid the emotional embarrass t p uing a claim in a public forum; +- C. That RRA originated its own cases from reputation, internal staff and outside referrals from other law firms; That RRA retained a company that owned Internet sites and well-placed "800" numbers designed to attract a large volume of high quality cases; That RRA rigorously screened the purported sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower settlement agreements; + +- F. That RRA utilized former law enforcement personnel and employed highly sophisticated investigative methods in selecting and pursuing claims against purported defendants; +- G. That RRA or other law firms pursued purported settlements with defendant companies prior to the initiation of litigation; +- H. That RRA or other law firms negotiated with the put t defendant plaintiff; +- I. That RRA or other law firms purported! ne safed with the defendant company and reached an agreement hi tained the settlement amount and the payment terms; +- J. That because the purpo ments occurred prior to the initiation of litigation, there s aseno urt or governmental entity involved in the transaction; S ) +- K. That th lleg efendant companies sent by wire transfer to RRA or other la ' trust accounts the full proceeds of the purported settlements; Tha during the settlement conference or other settlement negotiations when 0 a purported plaintiff protested the extended payment schedule, RRA or other law firms presented the purported plaintiff with the option of receiving a discounted lump sum payment from an unrelated confidential funding source; +- M. That RRA or other co-conspirators prepared a purported Assignment of Settlement Agreement in which the investor agreed to acquire the right to the company after such company was made aware of the ed claim by the 0 + +purported settlement payments for a discounted lump sum payment made to the purported plaintiff; + +- N. That when RRA received the payment by the investor it immediately disbursed those funds to the purported plaintiff; and +- O. That RRA made payment to the investor pursuant to the purported payment schedule set forth in the purported settlement agreement. + +15. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsel Aamml rm e ipotential investors that funds were maintained in designated trust accounts for st of the individual investor and that these funds were verified on a regular basis, week ,aot more often, by two independent verification sources, one being an attorney and ing an independent financial advisor (hereinafter referred to "independent verifi + +16. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and conspirators falsely informed potential investors that RRA's trust accounts were with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with th balances in the trust accounts all geedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to + +17. De fendan STEIN and other co-conspirators falsely informed potential investors that du 'gene would be undertaken with the following provisions: + +- An "independent verifier" would be permitted to ask questions of Defendant ROTHSTEIN and/or other co-conspirators to review the opportunity and structure; +- B. The "independent verifier" would have the opportunity to randomly review selected completed transactions to confirm the veracity of the information; + +- C. The "independent verifier" had already reviewed current transactions, including wire transfers received from defendants and payments made to plaintiffs; +- D. The "independent verifier" would have the opportunity to visit and speak with a senior banking officer at the local branch of the financial institution to confirm current trust account bank balances through k statements provided on line; and AS +- E. The "independent verifier" had the opportunity t w a senior banking officer to verify that the trust accounts were ed" and to verify the strength of RRA's financial positio ionship with the bank. + +18. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other rators established numerous trust accounts in the name of RRA in order to cony' till and current investors of the legitimacy of the confidential settlement agreemen d curity of such investments. + +19. Defendant ROTH other co-conspirators prepared and used altered bank statements, purportedly issu a well-established international financial institution, to fraudulently convince po d current investors that funds had been received from the purported defendant comps and maintained in trust accounts. + +20 rder to deceive investors, defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators crea and/or maintained fictitious online banking information regarding the purported trust accounts which falsely reflected the amount of funds maintained in such accounts, the receipt of funds wired from the alleged defendant companies and the transmission of funds by wire to the alleged plaintiffs, + +21. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements, assignment of settlement agreements and proceeds, sale and transfer agreements, and personal guaranties by Defendant ROTHSTEIN, among other documents. + +22. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators facilitated the movement and II transfer of funds between and among numerous trust accounts and operating acc n s in order to perpetuate the scheme. The movement and transfer of such funds insured that tfili s were available in the individual trust accounts in order to make scheduled payments + +23. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators ,False statements to current investors in order to convince them to re-invest in addi rted confidential settlement agreements. + +24. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and o an pirators facilitated the creation of false and fictitious "lock letters" which were issu Z ......" cutive at the financial institution where the trust and operating accounts were malalne . Such "lock letters" falsely reflected that the funds maintained in specific trust accounts would only be disbursed to specific investors. + +25. Defendant ROTH and other co-conspirators utilized funds received from investors to pay romiSfred "return on investment" to earlier investors. + +Ole ndant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators also initiated and conducted a ud clients of RRA in order to perpetuate the "Ponzi" scheme. Such clients had retained RRA to institute and file a civil lawsuit. Unknown to the clients, RRA settled the lawsuit and obligated the clients to pay \$500,000 to the defendant. In order to commit the fraud and deceive the clients, defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created a false and fraudulent court + +order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately \$23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. + +27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that in order to recover the defendant's funds, they had to post gds to be held in the RRA trust account. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirato di dulently caused the clients to wire transfer approximately \$57 million over several y account controlled by defendant ROTHSTEIN, purportedly to satisfy the bonds. + +28. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators caused the funds transmitted by the clients to be transferred to other RRA trust accounts in order to perpetuate the "Ponzi" scheme and to enrich those co-conspirators who were stated with the Enterprise. + +29. Defendant ROTHSTE ,co-conspirators were questioned by the clients as to the progress of the alleged laws'In er to delay the return of funds to the clients, defendant ROTHSTEIN fraudulently created a false Federal court order purportedly issued by a United States Magistrate Judge allegedly/ ordering RRA to return the transmitted funds by a later date. + +30. l ydant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the "P to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the f additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salaries and bonuses, and to acquire larger and more elaborate office space and equipment in order to enrich the personal wealth of persons employed by and associated with the Enterprise. + +31. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds illegally obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme to make political contributions to local, state and federal political candidates, in a manner designed to conceal the true source of such funds and to circumvent state and federal laws governing the limitations and contribution of such funds. + +32. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators used other corporations in order to launder proceeds generated from the "Ponzi" scheme to conceal the source of the bands utilized to make political contributions in order to promote the "Ponzi" scheme. + +33. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators paid kirge bonuses to employees of RRA purportedly as an award for exemplary work. Prior to the receipt of the bonuses, the employees were instructed to make large contributions to political candidates in the employees' names. Such conduct was designed to conceal the 1 % of the contribution and to illegally circumvent campaign finance laws. + +34. Defendant ROTHSTE of co-conspirators distributed lavish gifts including exotic cars, jewelry, boats, loans, bonuses to individuals and members of RRA in order to engender goodwill and loyalty and to create the appearance of a successful law firm. + +35. Defen da OTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators made large charitable contributions to lic and private charitable institutions, including hospitals and other legitimate charitable r d no profit organizations using funds derived from the "Ponzi" scheme. + +Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds illegally obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme to hire members of local police departments purportedly to provide security for RRA and defendant ROTHSTEIN's personal residence. "Ponzi" scheme funds were also used to provide gratuities to high ranking members of police agencies in order to curry favor with such police personnel and to deflect law enforcement scrutiny of the activities of RRA and defendant ROTHSTEIN. + +37. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the "Ponzi" scheme in order to purchase controlling interests in restaurants located in the Southern District of Florida. Such restaurants were used in part as a mechanism to give gratuities to individuals, including politicians, business associates and attorneys, in order to odwi II and loyalty, as a location to solicit potential investors and as a secure location forcon1oria meetings. + +38. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators th affluent and politically connected individuals in order to lure wealthy investors int Ponzi" scheme. + +39. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and otherco-consp iated with well known sports figures and politicians, in public forums and else er to gain greater notoriety and to create the appearance of wealth and legiti acts were calculated in part to enhance defendant ROTHSTEIN's ability to soli investors in the "Ponzi" scheme. + +40. Defendant ROTHS other co-conspirators used funds derived from the "Ponzi" scheme to maintain th ap ce of affluence and wealth, by purchasing expensive real and personal property, in convince potential investors of the legitimacy of RRA and of the purported inves oppo 'ties. Defendant ROTHSTEIN purchased expensive real property, personal 4 p 1 usiness interests, vessels, vehicles and other indicia of success and wealth. + +'olation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d). + +#### COUNT 2 + +(Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §I 956(h)) + +1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count I of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. + +2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter referred to as TD Bank) was a commercial bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida. The executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry ■, **New Jersey. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) b which were utilized during the course of the "Ponzi" scheme. at TD Bank,** + +**3. Gibraltar Private Bank and Trust (hereinafter a to as Gibraltar Bank) was a commercial bank with seven (7) branch offices, incl ch office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained at four (4) bank accounts at Gibraltar Bank, which were utilized during the course of the "Ponzi" scheme.** + +**4. From in or about 2005 and continuing thereafter through in or about November 2009, in Broward County, in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant,** + +**SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN,** + +**did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957, that is:** + +**i. to knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate and foreign commerce, which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, that is, mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, with the intent to promote the carrying on of said specified unlawful activities, and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transactions knew that the property involved in the financial** + +transaction represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1 XAXi); + +ii. to knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate commerce and foreign commerce, which transactions involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, that is, mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, knowing that the transactions were designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such fin cial transactions, knew that the property involved in the financial transactions repress fitted the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, in violation of Title 18, Uyi Code, Section 1956(aX1XBXi); and + +iii. to knowingly engage and attempt to engage, in mon ctions by, through or to a financial institution, affecting interstate and rei commerce, in criminally derived property of a value greater than \$10,000, w roperty having been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that i fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sectio 1343, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. + +All in violation of Title 18, United States ,.S on 1956(h). + +(Mail and Wire F iracy, 18 U.S.C. §1349) + +- I . The General Allega phs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated reference. +- 2. From in o t 2005 and continuing thereafter through in or about November 2009, in Broward Courkty n the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, + +did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with other persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, that is: + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +i. to knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing that they were false and fraudulent when made, and causing to be delivered certain mail matter by any private and commercial interstate carrier, according to the directions thereon, for the purpose of executing the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341 + +ii. to knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing that they were false and fraudulent when made, and transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce, certain signs, signals and sounds, for the purpose qlrexecuting the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1 + +#### THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY + +3. The purpose and object of the conspiracy w 'eft defendant ROTHSTEIN and his co-conspirators by illegally obtaining money from, iniesto and converting the investors' money to their own use and benefit through the operation of the above-described "Ponzi" scheme. + +All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349. + +#### COUNTS 4 and 5 (Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. §1343) + +1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. + +2. ,-On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami-Dade Coundes, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, + +SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, + +did knowingly and with intent to defraud devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from others by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, + +representations, and promises, knowing that such pretenses, representations, and promises were false and fraudulent when made, and for the purpose of executing the scheme, transmitted and caused to be transmitted certain wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce, as more particularly described below: + +| COUNT | DATE | WIRE COMMUNICATION | +|-------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 4 | December 2, 2008 | Interstate wire transfer sent from TD_Bank to | +| 5 | October 16, 2009 | Interstate wire transfer sen k from JP | + +All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Secti 3 and 2. + +#### EI ALE + +I. The allegations of this Informal Ileged and by this reference fully incorporated herein for the purpose of alleging forfeitures to the United States of America of certain property in which the defendant has an interest pursuant to 7(c)(2) and 32.2(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Forfeitur Lit being id sought pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1963(a), 982(a 981(a)(1)(C), as made applicable hereto by Title 28, United States Code, Section 24614 illiv + +2. Nonviction of the offense of RICO Conspiracy set forth in Count 1 of the Informatt defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States the following perty: + +- i. Any interest acquired or maintained pursuant to Section 1962; +- ii. Any interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual rights of any kind affording a source of influence over, the + +enterprise described in the Information which was established, operated, controlled and conducted pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962; and + +iii. Any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly and indirectly from racketeering activity pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962. + +3. Upon conviction of the offense of Money Laundering Conspiracy set forth in Count 2 of the Information, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States all property, real or personal, involved in or traceable to the offense which property shall include: + +> i. all money and other property that was the subject of each transaction, transportation, transmission and transfer in violation of Section 1956(h); + +ii. all commissions, fees and other property constituting proceeds obtained as a result of those tiotts; and + +iii. all propertyused iri in the approximate amount of \$71,793.06; in the approximate amount of \$995,521.42; at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Sc hstein, in the approximate amount of \$12,000,000; (BA7) B an \ ccoun at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Ahnick Khalid, up to ount of \$2,000,000; flank account at Banque Populaire, Morocco, in the name of Steve Caputi, up to the amount of \$1,000,000; + +of \$64,970.00; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account Holding, which, on or about NovemberA .11% 0 contained the approximate amount n the name of DJB Financial + +(BA13)Toronto Dominion Bank, Entertainment LLC unt ■ the name of RRA Sports and on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate am t of 10,490.10; + +(BA9) Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account in the name of Rothstcin Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. which, on or about November II, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$54,021.27; + +(BA10)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$10,085.00; + +(BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account in the of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, whic , , a''ut November I I, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$720,892 + +(BA14)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account in the name of RRA Goal Line Management, LLC, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the `> appioximate amount of \$25,216.27; 414/14\ / 14/k14\, / + +(BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of \$20,080.00. + +#### F. Business interests ("BI") + +- (BI I ) certificates, if issued, or the beneficial interest in such shares, of 50,000 shares of capital I., in Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust, a federally chartered savings association, purchased in or about September 2009 by GBPT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its manager, Bahia Property Management, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; (BI2) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; (B13) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; +- (814) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (B15) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (1316) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Priine; (1317) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Café Iguana, Pembroke Pines, Florida; (1318) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Cart Shield USA, LLC; (1319) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Renato Watches; (BI10) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Edify LLC; (B111) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in V Georgio Vodka; (BI12) S W. Rothstein's equity interest in Sea Club; (B113) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in North Star Mortgage; (BIT 4) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Kip Hunter Marketing; (B11 5) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Sports and Entertainment, LLC; (8116) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Versace Mansion/Casa Casuarina, including 10 year Operating Agreement with 2 ten year options; + +(BIl 7) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest, and licensing rights, in Alternative Biofuel Company; + +(BI 1 8) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in RRA Goal Line Management; + +(BI19) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Iron Street Management, LLC; + +(BI20) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and loan to, Africat Equity IG Decide; + +(BI21) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived from 1198 i e LLC; + +(BI22) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in, and rents derived from Iederal LLC; + +(13123) Promissory Note by Uniglobe in favor of Scott W. Ro r ( t ths2 + +(B124) All equity interest held by or on behalf of Scott W. ein, in the following corporations and entities: + +4C + +- a. 29 Bahia LLC; +- b. 235 GC LLC; +- c. 350 LOP#2840 +- d. 353 BR LLC. +- e. 10630 #1 +- f. 708rler LLC; 1012 roward LLC; 9 1198 Dixie LLC; 1299 Federal LLC; + - j. 2133 IP LLC; + - k. 15158 LLC; + - I. AANG LLC; + +- m. AAMG1 LLC; +- n. AAMM Holdings; +- o. ABT Investments LLC; +- p. Advanced Solutions; +- q. Bahia Property Management LLC; +- r. Boat Management LLC; +- s. BOSM Holdings LLC; +- t. BOVA Prime LLC; +- u. BOVA Restaurant Group LLC; +- v. The BOVA Group LLC; +- w. BOVA Smoke LLC; +- x. BOVCU LLC; +- y. BOVRI LLC; +- z. Broward Financial Holdings, Inc.; +- aa. CI07 LLC; +- ab. CI08 LLC; +- ac. CI16 LLC; +- ad. CI27 LLC; +- ae. CSU LLC; +- af. D & D Management & Investment LLC; +- ag. D & S Management and Investment LLC; +- ah. DJB Financial Holdings LLC; + +ai. DYMMU LLC; + +aj. Full Circle Fort Lauderdale LLC; + +ak. Full Circle Trademark Holdings LLC; + +al. GHW1 LLC; + +am. IDNL GEAH LLC; + +an. ILK3 LLC; + +ao. IS Management LLC; + +all JRCL LLC; + +acl• Judah LLC; + +ar. Kendall Sports Bar; + +as. Kip Hunter Marketing LLC; + +at. NF Servicing LLC; + +au. NRI 11 LLC; + +ay. NRI 15 LLC,S\* t) + +aw. NS HoldCgs L ; + +ax. + +bc. RRA Goal Line Management LLC; + +bd. RRA Sports and Entertainment LLC; + +PK Adventures LLC; + +PK's Ride Ltd; + +Rothstein Family Foundation; + +RRA Consulting Inc.; + +be. RSA 1 l th Street LLC; + +bf. RW Collections LLC; + +bg. S & KEA LLC; + +bh. Scorh LLC; + +bi. Tipp LLC; + +bj. VGS LLC; + +bk. The Walter Family LLC; + +bl. Walter Industries LLC; + +bm. WPBRS LLC; + +bn. WAWW; + +bo. WAWW 2 LLC; + +bp. WAWW 3 LLC; + +bq. WAWW 4 LLC; + +br. WAWW 5 L + +bs. WAWW 611.2.I.C; + +bt. WAWW 7 LLC; + +bu WAWW 8 LLC; + +0 WAWW 9 LLC; + +'÷w. WAWW 10 LLC; + +bx. WAWW 11 LLC; + +by. WAWW 12 LLC; + +bz. WAWW 14 LLC; + +04 + +- ca. WAWW 15 LLC; cb. WAWW 16 LLC; +- cc. WAWW 17 LLC; cd. WAWW 18 LLC; ce. WAWW 19 LLC; cf. WAWW 20 LLC; cg. WAWW 21 LLC; ch. WAWW 22 LLC; +- ci. JB Boca M Holdings LLC; + +and + +- G. Contributions ("C"), hereinafter contributions:" (C1) \$6,000 in campaign contrijw 'ons e to Alex Sink and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the U (C2) \$40,000 in camps co tfibutions to Republican Party of Florida, "Florida" account and volunte ered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party f (C3) in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida, "Federal" unt and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party of Florida; (C4) \$90,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party of Florida; referred to as "the defendant on behalf of Alex Sink; + +rQ SA + +- (C5) \$5,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Party of Florida by Rothstein business entity known as WAWW and voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the Republican Party of Florida; (C6) \$800,000 Charitable Donation to Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, which hospital voluntarily advised the United States of the donation from the Rothstein Family Foundation, for the purpose of facilitating forfeiture; (C7) \$1,000,000 Charitable Donation to Holy Cross Hospital, which advised the United States of the donation from the Rothstein Foundation, for the purpose of facilitating forfeiture; (C8) \$9,600 in campaign contributions to Govemor st, voluntarily offered, and turned over, to the United States by the arlie Crist; and (C9) All funds voluntarily turned over a led States (IRS/FBI), since in or about October 28, 2009, in respo to p icity regarding Scott W. Rothstein. +- 6. If any of the property d4iibe bove as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any ANasc voluntarily + +act and omission of the defendant + +- i. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; +- ii. has been( sferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; +- iii. has aced beyond the jurisdiction of the court; substantially diminished in value; or +- v. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; + +it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963(m), and pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), made applicable hereto by Title 18, United + +States Code, Section 982(b), and pursuant to Rule 32.2 Fed. R. Crim. P., to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described above. + +All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963, Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(1) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) made applicable through Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461; and the procedures outlined at Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. + +![]()JEFFREY H. SLOMAN +ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +![]()PAUL F. [REDACTED] +ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +![]()JEFFREY N. KAPLAN +ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +![]()LAWRENCE D. LAVECCHIO +ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +**vs.** + +**SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN** + +**CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY\*** + +\_\_\_\_\_ Defendant. \_\_\_\_\_ + +**Superseding Case Information:** + +**Court Division:** (Select One) + +New Defendant(s) Yes No + Number of New Defendants \_\_\_\_\_ + Total number of counts \_\_\_\_\_ + +     Miami      Key West      FTP +                         + +I do hereby certify that: + +1. 1. I have carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto. +2. 2. I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting their calendars and scheduling criminal trials under the mandate of the Speedy Trial Act, Title 28 U.S.C. Section 3161. +3. 3. Interpreter: (Yes or No) \_\_\_\_\_ + List language and/or dialect \_\_\_\_\_ +4. 4. This case will take   0   days for the parties to try. +5. 5. Please check appropriate category and type of offense listed below: + (Check only one) (Check only one) + I 0 to 5 days   X   Petty + II 6 to 10 days \_\_\_\_\_ Minor \_\_\_\_\_ + III 11 to 20 days \_\_\_\_\_ Misdem. \_\_\_\_\_ + IV 21 to 60 days \_\_\_\_\_ Felony \_\_\_\_\_ + V 61 days and over \_\_\_\_\_ +6. 6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No)   No   + If yes: Judge: \_\_\_\_\_ Case No. \_\_\_\_\_ + (Attach copy of dispositive order) + Has a complaint been filed in this matter? (Yes or No)   No   + If yes: Magistrate Case No. \_\_\_\_\_ + Related Miscellaneous numbers: \_\_\_\_\_ + Defendant(s) in federal custody as of \_\_\_\_\_ + Defendant(s) in state custody as of \_\_\_\_\_ + Rule 20 from the \_\_\_\_\_ District of \_\_\_\_\_ +7. 7. Is this a potential death penalty case? (Yes or No)   No +8. 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes   X   No +9. 9. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes   X   No + If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No +10. 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes   X   No +11. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes   X   No +12. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to September 1, 2007? Yes   X   No + +![]() + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +#### PENALTY SHEET + +Defendant's Name: SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN + +Count #: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; + +\* Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, \$250,000 fine + +Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; + +\* Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, \$500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. + +Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349; Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud; + +• Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, \$250,000 fine + +Counts #: 4-5 18 U.S.C. §§ 2; 1343; Wire Fraud + +\* Max.Penalty: f 20 years imprisonment, \$250,000 fine + +O + +\*Refers only to possible term of incarceration, does not include possible fines, restitution, special assessments, parole terms, or forfeitures that may be applicable. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41de21f9950f33c72220a7697fe400e97e77f457 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/EFTA02761940.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,19730 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 333, + "chars": 476651, + "elapsed_seconds": 55.49, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_297_Picture_10.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 391.4644470214844, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 391.4644470214844, + 231.66033935546875 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 231.66033935546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 365.81329345703125, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 365.81329345703125, + 554.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 554.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiffs' Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 343.8988952636719, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 343.8988952636719, + 282.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 282.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Overview", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 326.18487548828125, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 326.18487548828125, + 177.603515625 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 177.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ThoPktintiffs", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 335.75628662109375, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 335.75628662109375, + 401.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 401.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Defendants - Principal Conspirators", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 402.2685546875, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 402.2685546875, + 123.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 123.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Defendants - Co-Conspirators", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 386.0270080566406, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 386.0270080566406, + 426.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 426.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TV Bank Defendants r", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 432.790283203125 + ], + [ + 291.0744323730469, + 432.790283203125 + ], + [ + 291.0744323730469, + 452.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 452.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RRA Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 161.0059814453125, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 161.0059814453125, + 452.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 452.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Banyon Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 175.9840850830078, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 175.9840850830078, + 479.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 479.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Onyx Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 164.13827514648438, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 164.13827514648438, + 400.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 400.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CPA Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 157.9573974609375, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 157.9573974609375, + 295.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 295.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 348.5851745605469, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 348.5851745605469, + 125.103515625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 125.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Rothstein Facade", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 187.1181640625, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 187.1181640625, + 152.103515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 152.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Plan", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 124.71713256835938, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 124.71713256835938, + 612.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 612.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Pitch", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 126.493896484375, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 126.493896484375, + 532.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 532.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ponzi Scheme In Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 361.5364990234375, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 361.5364990234375, + 125.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 125.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fabricated Settlements Premised on Real Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 305.2104797363281, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 305.2104797363281, + 152.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 152.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiffs' Investments:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 190.62603759765625, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 190.62603759765625, + 125.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 125.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Banyon Income Fund", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 200.30491638183594, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 200.30491638183594, + 152.103515625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 152.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.072, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.9791870117188, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.9791870117188, + 87.603515625 + ], + [ + 432.072, + 87.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Razorback Funding, LW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 218.52943420410156, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 218.52943420410156, + 179.853515625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 179.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. D3 Capital Club, LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.62371063232422, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 127.9791259765625 + ], + [ + 74.62371063232422, + 127.9791259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 90.603515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 90.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. BFMC Investment, LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 214.10581970214844, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 214.10581970214844, + 128.853515625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 128.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 527.1116943359375, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 527.1116943359375, + 89.103515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 89.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Implosion of Rothstein's Portz! Schime", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 400.688720703125, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 400.688720703125, + 350.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 350.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "pevastating Fallout", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 350.6729736328125, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 350.6729736328125, + 534.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 534.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 429.01199999999994, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 89.103515625 + ], + [ + 429.01199999999994, + 89.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jurisdiction and Venue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 360.19781494140625, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 360.19781494140625, + 534.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 534.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 41 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 206.54999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT112 - FRAUDULENT MISRE PRESENTATIO IS\n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.344, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 463.2801513671875, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 463.2801513671875, + 272.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 160.344, + 272.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1113 - FRAUDULENT M1SREPRESE TI ON \n(against Roseanne Caretskvl", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 276.58282470703125 + ], + [ + 449.76104736328125, + 276.58282470703125 + ], + [ + 449.76104736328125, + 311.47357177734375 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 311.47357177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT W4 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 447.1740417480469, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 447.1740417480469, + 140.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 140.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VS - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 444.2001647949219, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 444.2001647949219, + 219.603515625 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 219.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 6 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against' Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 439.7001647949219, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 439.7001647949219, + 219.603515625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 219.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 7 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 452.9394836425781, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 452.9394836425781, + 220.353515625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 220.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 8 - FRAUDULENT 4RESENTATION \n(against Michael S turista)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 440.83721923828125, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 440.83721923828125, + 377.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 377.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 9 - FRAUDULENT MIS ATION \n(against Onyx Capital tl", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 440.1454162597656, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 440.1454162597656, + 350.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 350.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 10 - FRAUDUL rilli EPRFSENTATION \n(against Berenfeld S r er Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.1253662109375, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.1253662109375, + 404.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 404.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 11- NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 437.08209228515625, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 437.08209228515625, + 402.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 402.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 441.5701904296875, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 441.5701904296875, + 536.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 536.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT W113 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TI) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 444.9482421875, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 444.9482421875, + 140.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 140.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT V11114 - NEGLI REPRESENTATION \n(against", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 449.84210205078125, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 449.84210205078125, + 403.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 403.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 433.908, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.231689453125, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.231689453125, + 90.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 433.908, + 90.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "15 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(aaainst Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 438.60821533203125, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 438.60821533203125, + 536.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 536.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 16 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Banyon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.1894836425781, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.1894836425781, + 139.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 139.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 17 - NEGLIGENT RESENTATION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 437.0623779296875, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 437.0623779296875, + 405.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 405.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "18 - NEGLIGE MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Onvx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 436.3201904296875, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 436.3201904296875, + 536.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 536.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 19 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 140.13 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 20 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY MIT \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 217.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 217.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 244.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 244.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 21- AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OP FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 492.9172668457031, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 492.9172668457031, + 325.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 325.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FX22 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 495.72, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 349.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X23 - AIDING AND ABETTI1A1BRACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TO Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 496.33355712890625, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 496.33355712890625, + 404.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 404.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CO 24\\ AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 497.0472717285156, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 497.0472717285156, + 562.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 562.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 500.4635314941406, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 500.4635314941406, + 588.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 588.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "26 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \na ainst G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 491.08355712890625, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 491.08355712890625, + 614.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 614.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "27 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(earliest Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.46820068359375, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.46820068359375, + 615.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 615.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 28 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Banvon Income Fond, LP. and Banvon DWELL\u00b0", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.22, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 489.13446044921875, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 489.13446044921875, + 615.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 615.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 29 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 492.46820068359375, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 492.46820068359375, + 193.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 193.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "30 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY D \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 216.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 216.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 31- AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF F1t1 CI DUTY \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.28, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 492.13446044921875, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 492.13446044921875, + 298.73358154296875 + ], + [ + 116.28, + 298.73358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 32 \u2014 BREACH OF FIDIJIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Ro flu\\ 1 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 423.58355712890625, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 423.58355712890625, + 351.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 351.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X11133 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DO \n(against TD Bank. N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 296.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 296.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XW34 - F FIDUCIARY DUTY \na G. Levin", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 435.13446044921875, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 435.13446044921875, + 429.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 429.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 35 - BREACIEIFIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 424.6672668457031, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 424.6672668457031, + 298.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 298.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 36 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 455.9901123046875, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 455.9901123046875, + 141.603515625 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 141.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 37 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 424.5981750488281, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 424.5981750488281, + 139.353515625 + ], + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 139.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 38 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 423.5472717285156, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 423.5472717285156, + 600.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 600.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 39 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(nett Berenfeld Snritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 424.1533508300781, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 424.1533508300781, + 509.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 509.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 40 - AIDING A ABETTING FRAUD \n( -Inc Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 425.62261962890625, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 425.62261962890625, + 429.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 429.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 41 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 426.333984375, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 426.333984375, + 404.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 404.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XV42 - AIDING AND AB \n(against Roseanne Care", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 351.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 351.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X-VI43 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.36, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 439.05523681640625, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 439.05523681640625, + 299.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 299.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT_X-W144 - AIDI G A t A \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 350.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 350.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XX11145 - AIDING AND A FRAUD \n(against Irene A N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 286.724365234375 + ], + [ + 442.52716064453125, + 286.724365234375 + ], + [ + 442.52716064453125, + 365.3777160644531 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 365.3777160644531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 46 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \nfaeninst G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 428.21392822265625, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 428.21392822265625, + 299.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 299.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 47 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 427.52716064453125, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 427.52716064453125, + 246.603515625 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 246.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 48 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Bannon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 450.7606201171875, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 450.7606201171875, + 219.68701171875 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 219.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 49 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 425.21392822265625, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 425.21392822265625, + 298.73358154296875 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 298.73358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT SO - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Onyx Capital Manauement)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 426.39715576171875, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 426.39715576171875, + 219.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 219.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 51- AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 427.956298828125, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 427.956298828125, + 192.603515625 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 192.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 52\u2014 CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 380.35888671875, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 380.35888671875, + 142.353515625 + ], + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 142.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X1X53 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer-KepstettefFrank Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.552, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 455.04150390625, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 455.04150390625, + 140.103515625 + ], + [ + 150.552, + 140.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 54 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.1827697753906, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.1827697753906, + 216.603515625 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 216.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT MC55 - AIDING AND ABETTING CO \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 299.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 299.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X XI56 - AIDING ABETTING BETTING v CONVERSION \n(against TD Bank, NA.I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 452.7802734375, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 452.7802734375, + 427.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 427.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 433.908, + 76.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 76.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 89.853515625 + ], + [ + 433.908, + 89.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXII57 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 455.7613525390625, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 455.7613525390625, + 137.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 137.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT WIL58- AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 459.9327697753906, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 459.9327697753906, + 218.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 218.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 59 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVE\u20ac5) \n(against G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 299.18701171875 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 299.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 60 - AIDING ANOAILETTING CONVERSION \n(against Prevel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 444.5627746582031, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 444.5627746582031, + 404.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 404.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CO 1 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \nnst Ramon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI. LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 452.2400817871094, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 452.2400817871094, + 532.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 532.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 62 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 444.1715393066406, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 444.1715393066406, + 219.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 219.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 63 - AIDING AND ABUT' RSION \n(against Onyx Capital t)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 444.5904235839844, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 444.5904235839844, + 351.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 351.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 64 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer. LLFI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 443.8240051269531, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 443.8240051269531, + 510.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 510.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 65 - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against Ti) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 411.1778564453125, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 411.1778564453125, + 641.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 641.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXW-66 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 457.333984375, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 457.333984375, + 141.603515625 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 141.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS , COUNT ,g(t-V67 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Sninosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.69000244140625, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 453.58209228515625, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 453.58209228515625, + 603.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 103.69000244140625, + 603.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "X 168 \u2022 FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 455.45208740234375, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 455.45208740234375, + 536.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 536.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X-X-VI169 - FRAUDULAT PRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 457.3213806152344, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 457.3213806152344, + 404.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 404.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X210.41170 FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTALTIOI\n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 272.103515625 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 272.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXIX71 - ULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against George C4. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 457.3201904296875, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 457.3201904296875, + 377.47357177734375 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 377.47357177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 72 - FRAUDULEWSREPRESENTATION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 443.0356750488281, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 443.0356750488281, + 271.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 271.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXX NECIAGENT73 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Fwink-SpinesoBanvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 493.3182373046875, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 493.3182373046875, + 140.853515625 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 140.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 74 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 441.1740417480469, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 441.1740417480469, + 220.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 220.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 75 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.344, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 440.45208740234375, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 440.45208740234375, + 656.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 160.344, + 656.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 76 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shedder Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 613.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 440.4482421875, + 613.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 440.4482421875, + 641.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 641.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(cOUNT 77 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(a \nSpinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.97999572753906, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 433.7001953125, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 433.7001953125, + 549.9735565185547 + ], + [ + 152.97999572753906, + 549.9735565185547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XXXI78 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 449.0701904296875, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 449.0701904296875, + 549.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 549.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I179\nR\nNEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION c t k)\n(against", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 452.0701904296875, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 452.0701904296875, + 545.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 545.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XXXII180 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 454.7001953125, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 454.7001953125, + 549.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 549.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 81 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(againstypank-SphiosaGeorge G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 234.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 234.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 82 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRFSENTATIOO'S \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.135009765625, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.135009765625, + 270.603515625 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 270.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 83 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banyon USVI,-LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 452.04473876953125, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 452.04473876953125, + 273.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 273.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 84 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(agakst Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 434.8182373046875, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 434.8182373046875, + 456.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 456.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 85 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 435.58209228515625, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 435.58209228515625, + 425.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 425.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 86 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(antistiierenteld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.83209228515625, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.83209228515625, + 510.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 510.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COTO7 IDING AND ABETTIN BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \na ainst S inosa", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 489.1672668457031, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 489.1672668457031, + 563.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 563.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X.NOW88 - AIDING AND AB 4G BREACII OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.084, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.46820068359375, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.46820068359375, + 425.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 96.084, + 425.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XXX VI89 \u2022 AIDING AND 48ETNG BREACH OF FIDUCIARY \nDUTY, \n(against R i tskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 526.2973022460938, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 526.2973022460938, + 391.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 391.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X-'4)4441190 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TI) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 510.46820068359375, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 510.46820068359375, + 141.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 141.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VA-V11191 - A t t IN AND ABETTING BRE CH a ETD CIARY DUTY \nagainst Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.8, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 511.96820068359375, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 511.96820068359375, + 219.603515625 + ], + [ + 91.8, + 219.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XX-MaX92 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(againstFrank-Prffelrene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 507.4548034667969, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 507.4548034667969, + 141.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 141.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "93 - AIDIN AND BETT NG BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \na ainst G. Levin", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 488.0144348144531, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 488.0144348144531, + 602.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 602.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 94 - AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \ningLijaaaH_Ilreve", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 489.8481750488281, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 489.8481750488281, + 522.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 522.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT X1,95 - AIDING AND ABETTING IThEACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Banyon Income Fund, LP, and Banyon USVI, LLCI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 497.0144348144531, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 497.0144348144531, + 399.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 399.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 96 - G AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 490.6672668457031, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 490.6672668457031, + 509.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 509.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 97 - AI II / brAND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 490.2644348144531, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 490.2644348144531, + 522.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 522.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUN14 AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n( (against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 490.2972717285156, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 490.2972717285156, + 548.4735565185547 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 548.4735565185547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 99 \u2014 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 422.01446533203125, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 422.01446533203125, + 455.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 455.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COOL ;14100 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY O4 .Ylbsj\n(against 'ED Bank. N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 453.4995422363281, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 453.4995422363281, + 298.139892578125 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 298.139892578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLII101 - BREA.Ccf1 4)F FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Freak-PeeveGeorge G. Levitt)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 436.2048034667969, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 436.2048034667969, + 429.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 429.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 102 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against' Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 425.01446533203125, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 425.01446533203125, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 216.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNT X1,111--.4111ING-AND-411E-7--TING-FRAVD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 433.36444091796875, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 433.36444091796875, + 532.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 532.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 103 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 424.6672668457031, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 424.6672668457031, + 585.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 585.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 104 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n\\< , (against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 425.4172668457031, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 425.4172668457031, + 509.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 509.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 105 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 424.6344909667969, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 424.6344909667969, + 246.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 246.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 106 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shedder Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 424.1533508300781, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 424.1533508300781, + 654.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 654.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 107 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Frank Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 427.833984375, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 427.833984375, + 429.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 429.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLI-V108 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 442.833984375, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 442.833984375, + 244.353515625 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 244.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 7a,V109 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 439.87261962890625, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 439.87261962890625, + 653.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 653.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n1cr (against TD Bank, N.A.1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 481.14 + ], + [ + 441.37261962890625, + 481.14 + ], + [ + 441.37261962890625, + 509.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 509.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XLV:11111 - AIDING r ETTING FRAUD \n(against r ebra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 444.3030700683594, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 444.3030700683594, + 587.9470672607422 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 587.9470672607422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT Ali' I ING AND ABETTING FRAUD \nnet PreyeIrene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 445.87261962890625, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 445.87261962890625, + 456.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 456.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 113 - AIDI AND ABETTING ERA 0 \n(aaainst G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 265.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 435.07501220703125, + 265.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 435.07501220703125, + 296.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 296.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 114 - AIDING ANI) ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 427.43524169921875, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 427.43524169921875, + 140.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 140.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OONT 1,2611015 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \nnst Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVL LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.552, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 450.68951416015625, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 450.68951416015625, + 563.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 150.552, + 563.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "?Si OUNT 116 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.91000366210938, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 427.12261962890625, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 427.12261962890625, + 549.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 152.91000366210938, + 549.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 117 - AWING AND ABE \n(against Onyx Capital \n)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 426.56399999999996, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 426.56399999999996, + 350.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 350.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 118 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer. LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 428.2426452636719, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 428.2426452636719, + 219.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 219.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 119 - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 377.4102783203125, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 377.4102783203125, + 615.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 615.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CO \nUN 20 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \nfratiosa", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 449.8127746582031, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 449.8127746582031, + 509.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 509.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1.112CDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 437.39312744140625 + ], + [ + 450.9215087890625, + 437.39312744140625 + ], + [ + 450.9215087890625, + 495.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 495.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1,14122.AlbING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 452.79150390625, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 452.79150390625, + 495.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 495.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTM11123 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 455.7613525390625, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 455.7613525390625, + 494.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 494.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 44-1.'124 - AIDING AND ABETTIN CONVE ION \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 455.4115905761719, + 638.2800000000001 + ], + [ + 455.4115905761719, + 666.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 666.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT INI25 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Frank-PresteIrene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 610.74 + ], + [ + 453.54150390625, + 610.74 + ], + [ + 453.54150390625, + 640.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 640.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "p12ffla tiliranTT NG CO ERSIO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 573.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 573.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 127 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 584.8199999999999 + ], + [ + 444.9102478027344, + 584.8199999999999 + ], + [ + 444.9102478027344, + 613.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 613.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12-14128 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \nnst Banvon Income Fund. LP. and Banvon USVI. LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 453.9215087890625, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 453.9215087890625, + 560.8535308837891 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 560.8535308837891 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 129 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 447.5415344238281, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 447.5415344238281, + 140.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 140.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 130 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 677.9699999999999 + ], + [ + 446.4439697265625, + 677.9699999999999 + ], + [ + 446.4439697265625, + 694.3535385131836 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 694.3535385131836 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(against Ons x Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 393.69256591796875, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 393.69256591796875, + 128.103515625 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 128.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 131 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 447.1827697753906, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 447.1827697753906, + 219.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 219.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 132 - NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.108, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 414.5478515625, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 414.5478515625, + 218.853515625 + ], + [ + 189.108, + 218.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT L-VI4133 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 455.83209228515625, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 455.83209228515625, + 141.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 141.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT b-V-114134 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 457.333984375, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 457.333984375, + 601.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 601.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1.1X13(5)-F ULENT MISREPRESENTATION \nfanainst Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 452.0701904296875, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 452.0701904296875, + 481.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 481.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ") \nCOUNT I.X136 - FRAUDULENT MISREP RNT\nC\nATION \nfitgainst Roseanne Caretsk'(", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 281.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 451.7052917480469, + 281.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 451.7052917480469, + 323.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 323.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 14:1137 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank. N.A.1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 186, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.4482421875, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 452.4482421875, + 217.353515625 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 217.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 138-IRAUDULENT PRESENTATION \n(against crank-SpinosaGeo e G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 494.06341552734375, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 494.06341552734375, + 323.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 323.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 139 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 443.4240417480469, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 443.4240417480469, + 219.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 219.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 140 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Banyon Income Fund, LI', and Banyon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 189, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 451.05950927734375, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 451.05950927734375, + 141.603515625 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 141.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 141 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 443.83209228515625, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 443.83209228515625, + 219.603515625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 219.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 142 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 446.29412841796875, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 446.29412841796875, + 139.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 139.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 143 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 445.3040466308594, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 445.3040466308594, + 140.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 140.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 144 NEGLIGE MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 439.70208740234375, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 439.70208740234375, + 575.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 575.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT InVI4145 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 452.8182373046875, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 452.8182373046875, + 587.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 587.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'egUNT LicW146 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.55999755859375, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 451.7001647949219, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 451.7001647949219, + 588.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 134.55999755859375, + 588.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OUNTWA147 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank. N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 195, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 452.85821533203125, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 452.85821533203125, + 589.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 589.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GOUNT--LXVI\u2014AIDING-AND-M1E-T-TIN \nCOUNT 148 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTA \n(against gpank-SpinosaGeorge G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 499.392, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 499.392, + 282.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 282.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 149 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATIOL \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 198, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 295.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 295.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 150 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Banvon Income Fund. LP, and Banvon", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 451.65599999999995, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 451.65599999999995, + 296.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 296.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 151 - NEGLIGE MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 399.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 438.58209228515625, + 399.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 438.58209228515625, + 427.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 427.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "S C;\nCOUNT 152 - NEGLIGE SREPRESENTATION \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 390.05810546875 + ], + [ + 439.34368896484375, + 390.05810546875 + ], + [ + 439.34368896484375, + 427.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 427.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 153 - NE IGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shedder Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 202, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 440.4639892578125, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 440.4639892578125, + 479.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 479.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 154 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY Dull' \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 495.4539794921875, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 495.4539794921875, + 480.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 480.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LX-VRISS - AIDING AND ABETTING B1i A,CH1pP FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Jennifer Ke", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 509.7972717285156, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 509.7972717285156, + 349.8714599609375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 349.8714599609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXVIIIIS6 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Roseanne Caretsky)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 205, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.248, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 512.34814453125, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 512.34814453125, + 216.603515625 + ], + [ + 94.248, + 216.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LaXIX1S7 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TI) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 507.4548034667969, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 507.4548034667969, + 139.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 139.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LKX158 - A ING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.96820068359375, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.96820068359375, + 217.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 217.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 122X42459 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 507.51446533203125, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 507.51446533203125, + 138.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 138.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNT 160 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 492.88446044921875, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 492.88446044921875, + 599.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 599.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 161 - AIDINGCND \"S\" ETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.22, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 494.4172668457031, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 494.4172668457031, + 480.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 480.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 162 - AIDING AND ABETTING BRE DUCIARY DUTY \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, USVI,LLO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 493.2644348144531, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 493.2644348144531, + 350.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 350.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 163 - AIDING AND ABETTING B CH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 211, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 493.6672668457031, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 493.6672668457031, + 402.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 402.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT104 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF DUTY \n(against Onyx Capital Managements", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.16, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 490.6672668457031, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 490.6672668457031, + 297.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 297.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 165 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY,RUTY \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 246.603515625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 246.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 166 \u2014 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 214, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 428.38446044921875, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 428.38446044921875, + 140.853515625 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 140.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXII167 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against T1) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 214, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 493.29 + ], + [ + 444.1344909667969, + 493.29 + ], + [ + 444.1344909667969, + 522.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 522.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GOUNT-172XXLII-AIDING-AND-ABFs-rFING-MAAJD \nCOUNT 168 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against =-Spinesa G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 440.8900451660156, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 440.8900451660156, + 152.853515625 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 152.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT M. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 427.2972717285156, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 427.2972717285156, + 495.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 495.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 170 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \na ainst Ban \u2022on In s me Auld LP and Ban on USVI L", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 243.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 243.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 171 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 426.5144348144531, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 426.5144348144531, + 164.853515625 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 164.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNICAREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 426.21356201171875, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 426.21356201171875, + 494.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 494.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 173 - BREACH OF FIDUCIA \n(against Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter LP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 219, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.316, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 425.3193054199219, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 425.3193054199219, + 323.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 179.316, + 323.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 174 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against SpInosal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 429.71392822265625, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 429.71392822265625, + 138.603515625 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 138.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(CUNT i -1 175 -AIDING AND ABETTTING FRAUD \n(against Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.3699951171875, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 449.55523681640625, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 449.55523681640625, + 546.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 153.3699951171875, + 546.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXVI76 - AIDING AND G FRAUD \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 221, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 444.37261962890625, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 444.37261962890625, + 373.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 373.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT VOMIT? - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against TI) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.344, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 447.68524169921875, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 447.68524169921875, + 216.603515625 + ], + [ + 160.344, + 216.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXV11178 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Debra Villegas)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 223, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 449.52655029296875, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 449.52655029296875, + 216.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 216.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 172XXVID179 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 224, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 450.30523681640625, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 450.30523681640625, + 139.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 139.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(\"N( S 1\nNis-) M. :i?,:r\nAND\nM r.,evilZir FRAUD\n(ag", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 224, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.16000366210938, + 534.818115234375 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 534.818115234375 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 575.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 134.16000366210938, + 575.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 181 - AIDING S \\ ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 427.12261962890625, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 427.12261962890625, + 428.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 428.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 182 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \na ainst Ban on Income Fund LP and Ban on USVI LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 226, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 237.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 237.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 183 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 227, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 429.333984375, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 429.333984375, + 212.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 212.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 184 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 227, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 428.583984375, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 428.583984375, + 594.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 594.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 228, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 527.4791870117188, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 527.4791870117188, + 82.353515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 82.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 185 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Rerouted Spritzer Shechter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 228, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 427.833984375, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 427.833984375, + 448.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 448.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 186 - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 377.7802734375, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 377.7802734375, + 239.103515625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 239.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT WAIXI87 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 230, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.5302734375, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.5302734375, + 134.103515625 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 134.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1:4OOO/18 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(unjust Jennifer Kerstetter)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 231, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 463.6602478027344, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 463.6602478027344, + 133.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 133.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT woais9 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.1602478027344, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.1602478027344, + 134.103515625 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 134.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "& -E190 -AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against TI) Bank. N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.312, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 468.0032958984375, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 468.0032958984375, + 567.6870574951172 + ], + [ + 138.312, + 567.6870574951172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT LXXXIII191 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 234, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 469.6715087890625, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 469.6715087890625, + 212.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 212.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1.-XXXI-V192 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 235, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 468.5113525390625, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 468.5113525390625, + 212.853515625 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 212.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 193 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n,tst i", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 445.0890197753906, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 445.0890197753906, + 211.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 211.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 194 AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 237, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 446.3813781738281, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 446.3813781738281, + 212.853515625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 212.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 195 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Banyon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 238, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 452.5594787597656, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 452.5594787597656, + 211.353515625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 211.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 196 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Michael Szfranald)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 447.9327697753906, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 447.9327697753906, + 344.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 344.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 240, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 526.7366943359375, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 526.7366943359375, + 82.353515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 82.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 197 - AIDING AND ABETTI110aNVERSION \n(against Onyx Capital t)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 240, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.38311767578125, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.38311767578125, + 343.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 343.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 198 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Berenfeld SyrItzer %eater Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 241, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 446.0415344238281, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 446.0415344238281, + 397.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 397.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 199 - NE NT SUPERVISION \n(aa ank N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 242, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.272, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 413.8223571777344, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 413.8223571777344, + 423.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 187.272, + 423.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 243, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 526.3616943359375, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 526.3616943359375, + 83.10357666015625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 83.10357666015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 140242V200 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.2001953125, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.2001953125, + 133.353515625 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 133.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ari cr 1NTI2XX:NAL1201 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.41999816894531, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 467.083984375, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 467.083984375, + 594.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 104.41999816894531, + 594.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT IneveX7C-VD UDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, Nita", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 469.3182373046875, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 469.3182373046875, + 476.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 476.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT UDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 246, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.9501647949219, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.9501647949219, + 474.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 474.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT InY.XXVP'204 - FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 470.45208740234375, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 470.45208740234375, + 317.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 317.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XG20S - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 248, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 446.0701904296875, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 446.0701904296875, + 211.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 211.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT Xe1206 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 249, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.836, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 450.5701904296875, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 450.5701904296875, + 213.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 154.836, + 213.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 250, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.7342529296875, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.7342529296875, + 82.353515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 82.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XG14207 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 250, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 452.83209228515625, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 452.83209228515625, + 317.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 317.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 208 - NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION \nLi\n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 251, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 440.0968322753906, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 440.0968322753906, + 301.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 301.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT liGH4209 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Spinosa) L", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 252, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 507.4542236328125, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 507.4542236328125, + 265.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 265.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XGI-V210 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TI) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 253, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 506.71820068359375, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 506.71820068359375, + 134.853515625 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 134.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCV211 \u2022 AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 253, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 647.19 + ], + [ + 502.5981750488281, + 647.19 + ], + [ + 502.5981750488281, + 675.6035385131836 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 675.6035385131836 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCV-1212 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Debra 'Meats)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 254, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 504.8481750488281, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 504.8481750488281, + 596.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 596.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 525.2291870117188, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 525.2291870117188, + 82.353515625 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 82.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XG141213 - AIDjNG A113YABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \nagainst Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 507.8481750488281, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 507.8481750488281, + 476.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 476.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 214 - AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Andrew Barittl", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 256, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.548, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 491.3481750488281, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 491.3481750488281, + 343.73358154296875 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 343.73358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 215 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 423.8844909667969, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 423.8844909667969, + 212.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 212.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT XCVM216 - BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 592.92 + ], + [ + 442.2972717285156, + 592.92 + ], + [ + 442.2972717285156, + 622.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 622.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OUNT XCIX217 \u2022 AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 258, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 440.583984375, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 440.583984375, + 581.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 581.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Bank, N.A.) \nCOUNT 6218 - AID S ICBETTING FRAUD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 259, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 429.7426452636719, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 429.7426452636719, + 423.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 423.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 61219 \u2022 AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 433.14715576171875, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 433.14715576171875, + 135.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 135.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AND ABETTING FRAUD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 434.64715576171875, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 434.64715576171875, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 541.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT GHT22 \n(against\nETTING FRAUD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 262, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 437.18524169921875, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 437.18524169921875, + 396.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 396.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 222 - AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD \n(against Andrew Barnett)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 263, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 427.7708435058594, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 427.7708435058594, + 238.447021484375 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 238.447021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT GIV223 - CONVERSION \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 264, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 389.7613525390625, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 389.7613525390625, + 134.853515625 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 134.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT GV224 - AIDING &BETTING CONVERSION \n(against Spinosa)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 264, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 454.3127746582031, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 454.3127746582031, + 596.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 596.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 0225 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against T1) Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 265, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 456.9215087890625, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 456.9215087890625, + 556.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 556.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CVII226 - AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against David Boden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 266, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 456.1715087890625, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 456.1715087890625, + 611.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 611.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COISICVI11227 - AIDING AND ABE G CONVERSIO \n(against Debra", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 267, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 556.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 556.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CIX228liIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION \n(against Andrew-Battnettlrene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 268, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 455.38140869140625, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 455.38140869140625, + 503.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 503.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 229 - AI 'QM ABETTING CONVERSION \n;first Andrew Barnett}", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 269, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 401.8681335449219 + ], + [ + 443.7802734375, + 401.8681335449219 + ], + [ + 443.7802734375, + 449.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 449.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT GX230 - NEGLI UPERVISION \n(against TO Rants N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 270, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 420.9275817871094, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 420.9275817871094, + 397.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 397.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C014 1- CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Scott Rothstein)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 271, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 404.8441162109375, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 404.8441162109375, + 476.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 476.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CX1I232 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against TD Bank, N.A.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 273, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 408.99884033203125, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 408.99884033203125, + 186.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 186.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT OkH12.33 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Spinosal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 274, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 411.2017822265625, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 411.2017822265625, + 635.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 635.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT GNIV234 - CONSPIRACY \n(against Jennife ejstettcrj", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 276, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 410.87884521484375, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 410.87884521484375, + 370.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 370.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 526.5480346679688, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 526.5480346679688, + 82.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 82.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXV235 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Roseanne Caretskv)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 633.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 406.76629638671875, + 633.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 406.76629638671875, + 662.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 662.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT cx-stail\u00a7tm CONSPIRACY \n(aest David Baden)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.94400000000002, + 391.0054626464844 + ], + [ + 408.22412109375, + 391.0054626464844 + ], + [ + 408.22412109375, + 423.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 190.94400000000002, + 423.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT CXVII237 CIVIL CONSPI \n(against Deb", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 134.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 134.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT aW111.238- VIL CONSPIRACY \n(=dust Andrew Barnettj", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 395.28 + ], + [ + 415.74884033203125, + 395.28 + ], + [ + 415.74884033203125, + 424.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 424.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT QiI;c239 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Preve)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 284, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 410.1064758300781, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 410.1064758300781, + 187.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 187.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 240 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \nagainst Irene Stay)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 395.4517822265625, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 395.4517822265625, + 503.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 503.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 241 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Michael Szfranski)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 287, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 395.8564758300781, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 395.8564758300781, + 213.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 213.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CO 9242 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \nfagainst Onyx Capital Management)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 467.63470458984375 + ], + [ + 395.0941162109375, + 467.63470458984375 + ], + [ + 395.0941162109375, + 502.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 502.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 243 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \nfacainst G. Levin)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 290, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 394.33172607421875, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 394.33172607421875, + 264.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 264.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 244 - CIVIL CONSPIRACY \n(against Banvon Income Fund, LP, and Banvon USVI, LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 581.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 581.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.731689453125, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.731689453125, + 82.353515625 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 82.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 245 - I CONSPIRACY \n(against Berent ritzeiSheehter Sheer, LLP)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 293, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 423.8363037109375, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 423.8363037109375, + 422.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 422.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 377.4031066894531, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 377.4031066894531, + 120.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 120.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 412.3081359863281, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 412.3081359863281, + 84.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 84.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 354.528076171875, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 354.528076171875, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 425.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N14/ , ENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.99002075195312, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 384.0180358886719, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 384.0180358886719, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 222.99002075195312, + 481.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 1 \n(Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. \u00a71962(d))", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 425.1706848144531, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 425.1706848144531, + 87.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 87.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE ENTERPRISE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 357.9129943847656, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 357.9129943847656, + 172.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 172.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE RACKETEERING CONSP", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 314.60302734375 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 314.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCOTT W. ROTH TE1N,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 373.2849426269531, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 373.2849426269531, + 399.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 399.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 439.3788146972656, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 439.3788146972656, + 74.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 74.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "K \nTHE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE RACKETEERING ACTIVITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 376.861572265625 + ], + [ + 491.095458984375, + 376.861572265625 + ], + [ + 491.095458984375, + 400.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 400.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 300, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 488.4229431152344, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 488.4229431152344, + 130.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 130.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MANNER AND MEANS OF THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 301, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 483.6477966308594, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 483.6477966308594, + 131.60302734375 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 131.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 310, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 336.1009521484375, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 336.1009521484375, + 73.863037109375 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 73.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 311, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 397.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 312, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 450.6334228515625, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 450.6334228515625, + 300.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 300.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTS 4 and 5 \n(Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. \u00a71343)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 312, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 386.1826477050781, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 386.1826477050781, + 456.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 456.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EI ALE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 313, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 343.863037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 343.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Real Properties (\"RP\"):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 315, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 272.1997375488281, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 272.1997375488281, + 102.363037109375 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 102.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Vehicles and Vessels (\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 319, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 414.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 414.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Tangibles (\"T\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 320, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 233.9803924560547, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 233.9803924560547, + 359.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 359.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Bank Accounts (\"BA\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 321, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 257.58 + ], + [ + 261.87908935546875, + 257.58 + ], + [ + 261.87908935546875, + 273.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 273.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Business interests (\"BI\")", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 323, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.548, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 278.1192321777344, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 278.1192321777344, + 74.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 74.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 331, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 14.579999999999998 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 14.579999999999998 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 32.400000000000006 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 32.400000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 331, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 498.78, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 498.78, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 93.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 332, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 414.386474609375, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 414.386474609375, + 85.863037109375 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 85.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PENALTY SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 332, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 358.3401184082031, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 358.3401184082031, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 367 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 258, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 259, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 260, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 261, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 262, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 263, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 264, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 265, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 266, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 267, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 268, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 269, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 270, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 271, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 272, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 273, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 274, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 275, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 276, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 277, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 278, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 279, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 280, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 281, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 282, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 283, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 284, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 285, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 286, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 287, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 288, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 289, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 290, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 291, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 292, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 293, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 294, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 295, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 296, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 297, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 298, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 299, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 300, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 301, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 302, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 303, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 304, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 305, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 306, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 307, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 308, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 309, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 310, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 311, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 312, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 313, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 314, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 315, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 316, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 317, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 318, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 319, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 320, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 321, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 322, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 323, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 324, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 325, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 326, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 327, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 328, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 329, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 330, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 331, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 151 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "Text", + 46 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 332, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02761940" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/_page_297_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/_page_297_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5470e0769128dcde47784c9378b0bbca19011d1f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02761940/_page_297_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:51a0c85fd9d1859bba27788c048eaa1cd72975144758fe19c8abbee9616bc8bb +size 13387 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5e3181004bdc622fd2fd34477f81280fbe7546e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.md @@ -0,0 +1,435 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 5 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifttounter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motio : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP. 23** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 +CASE NO. + +Plaintiff, + +50 2009 CA 0 0 0 XXXXMB + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually, and +L.M., Individually, + +Defendants. + +COMPLAINT + +COPY +RECEIVED FOR FILING +DEC 07 2009 + +United States Department of Justice +CLERK & COMPTROLLER +CIRCUIT CIVIL SERVICES + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., Individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: + +SUMMARY OF ACTION + +Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations to the administration of justice, deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, actionable frauds, and the orchestration and conducting of egregious civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious injury to Jeffrey Epstein one of several targets of their misconduct + +and others. Rothstein and fraud had no boundary; Rothstein and his coconspirators forged Federal court orders and opinions. Amongst the violations of law that are the subject of this lawsuit are the marketing of non-existent Epsteimpettlements end the sanctioning of a serios•of depositions-that were unrelated to any principled • litigation purpose but instead designed to discover extraneous private information about ..Epstein or his personal and business associates (including well-known public figures) in -Oder to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein. The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil litigation strategy that was unrelated to the merits or -value of their clients' cases and, Instead, had as its improper purpose the furthering of Rothstein's misrepresentations and deceit to third party investors. As a result, Epstein was subject to abusive investigatory tactics, unprincipled media attacks, and unsupportable legalfillngs. This lawsuit is filed and will 'be vigorously pursued against all those defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to coinpr0mise the tore values of both state and federal Justice 'systems' in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that Is the subject of this Complaint. + +ae,r\_Plaintiff reserves the right to add.additIonal defendants co-conspirators as the and evidence is developed. + +### GENERAL ALLEGATONS + +- 1. ThIS Is an action for damages In excess of \$15,000.00, exclusive costs, interest, ❑nd attorneys' fees. + +• + +2. Plaintiff, EPSTEIN, Is an aduttand currently is residing and works in Palm Beach :County, Florida. + +• + +..• 1 Defendant, scan ROTHSTEIN ("ROTHSTEIN"), is an individual residing In Broward'COuntys Florida, and was licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. In •Novernber2000, 'ROTHSTEIN voluntarily relinquished pis lay/licenseIn the midst of the irriP101itirraf Rethateirt, keterifeldt and Adier;. PA. cRRA-). Ho was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 20, 2009:. DeCember 1, 2009, ROTHSTEIN was arrested and arreigned.in Federal Court in Broward County, Florida; + +4. At alllimes relevant hereto, ROTHS l' I ic:Was , the managing partner and CEO of titr i + +'5.• Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal OVvnere of SqultVin RRA and-each co-founded ARA. + +6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. ('\_").• Is an individual residing In Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law to the State of Florida. At ail trees relevant hereto,• was an employee, agent, associate, partner, •sbarehtiltlerncd/or other representative of PRA. + +7. ' eft, L.,M..fl.M.% is an-IndWidualresiding in Palm Beach County, Florida. mes relevant hereto, L.M. was represented by BRA, ROTHSTEIN and in a civil lawsuit against Epstein and was an essential participant In the scheme referenced infra by. among other things, substantially changing prior sworn testimony, so as to assist the Defendants In promoting their fraudulent scheme for the + +t. + +promise of a multl-million dollar recovery relative to the Civil Actions (defined' below) Involving Epstein, which was completely out of proportion to her alleged damages. + +8. Non-party, RRA is a Florida Professional Service Corporation, with a .principal iitlaierits•of 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401. in addition to its principal. office, RRA also maintained seven offices In Florida, New York, and Venezuela, and employed over 70 attorneys and 200stipffigA Staff. RRA also maintains an office; O1109 NE-2d Street, Hollendale Beach, Florida 33009-8515. RRA, through Its ,attorneys, including those named as Defendants heroin, conducted"busIness throughout Florida, and relevant to this action, conducted business and filed lawsuits on behalf of clients 'In Palm Beach County, Florida. (RRA is currently a debtor in • bankruptcy. RRA is not named anWefendant). " + +### FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS + +'9. Tho United Stettin Untied States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohri, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. • Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of 'RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the enterprise • as being the law firm, RRA, through which Rothstein in conjunction with "his coconspirators" (not yet Identified by the USA) engaged in the pattern of racketeering through its base of operation at the offices of RRA from sometime in 2005 up through and continuing Into November of 2009. Through various criminal activities, including mall fraud, wire fraud and money laundering, the United States of America asserts that + +•4 + +t• 1 + +Rothstein: and his co-conspirators unlawfully obtained approximately \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud In connection with a Ponzi scheme. The USA further alleges that "Rothstein and co-conspirators initiated the criminal conduct alleged In the instant information in order to personally enrich themselves and to-supplement the Income and sustain the daily operation of RRA." In essence, in the absence of-Rothsteln and his coconspirators Conducting the Ponzi scheme, the daily° Ca i bon of RRA, which included payroll (Compensation to lawyers, staff, investigatonL e ), accounts payable including unlimited Improper, harassing and .potential illegal investigation on cases, including Epstein-related matters, would in all likelihood would not have been' sustainable. A copy of the information is attached as ExhIbict to ltils.action. + +10. As more fully set forth herein, 1:tRA held • itself out as legitimately and properly .engaging In the practice of law. In reality, ROTHSTEIN' and others In RRA were -using RRA to•market Investrtilts, as describcd•below,.so as to bilk investors out of hundreds • of millions of clotks. ROTHSTEIN and others In RRA• devised an elaborate plan through which we Sold purported confidential aSsignmonts. of a structured pay-out • settiemet, 'supposedly reached on behalf of RRA for clients, in exchange for immediate payments to these clients ola discounted lump sum amount. Investors-were being promised In excess of a 30% return•on their Investment which was to be paid out to the Investors 'over time. While some of the cases rolled upon to Induce Investor funding were existing -filed bases, it is believed that the confidential, structured pay-out settlernents were all fabricated. + +4 + +11. Based on media reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) press conferences end releases and the Information the massive Rani scheme and pattern of criminal activity meant to lure Investors began sometime In 2005 and contin .thIugh the fall of 2009, when the scheme was uncovered by some of the Irma 8 CI the FBI. As of November of 2009, civil lawsuits were and continue to be filehgainst various 'Defendants as•result of their massive fraudulent and crIngnal scheme. + +12. This fraudulent and Illegal Investment scheme 'Salsa evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For ErnaS ' &nay Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart i A. Rosenfoldt, Or, In The Alternative, Alte ative, For tho Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, IndivIdualiy, (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business. Div.Vitereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and. attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 7 + +13. Plaintiff ref lances the M dissolution action for the sole purpose that It acknowledges tha RA and ROTHSTEIN were in fact conducting an Illegal and. Improper Investment. or Ponzl scheme based on promises of financial returns from settlements or outcomes of supposed legal actions, including the actions brought against Plaintiff EPSTEIN. The RRA dissolution action alleges in part that — "ROTHSTEIN, the managing .partner and CEO of the firm (RRA), has, according to assertions of certain Investors, allegedly orchestrated a substantial misappropriation of funds from Investor trust accounts that made use of the law firm's name (RRA). The Investment business created and operated by ROTHSTEIN centered around the sale of + +• r + +pstifin w RRA,•at at. + +Page 7 + +interests In structured settlements." See Preliriiinary Statement of RRA dissolution 'action, Eihibit 2 hereto. + +14; in furtherance of the scheme. RittA's letterhead was• used in communications reea.tdingirweettnerit earrEirtirisittee itt .purpettetretniatUred. settlements.. • RRA's trust account was used to deposit.hundredir of millions of dollars or wire transfer of mor's from duped:Investorsand Other victims. RRA personally guaranteed payments. + +15i flothsteln% scheme went so far as to manufacture false. and frauduleht Court opinbne/orders including forging, the signatures of U.S. District Judge, .Kenneth A. 'MarraandliateirculiC0UrtJUdge,-Sutan ft, Black, Circuit in otherceses, It.fi not yet known if :he forged similar deCtimente• In Espteln related matters. leg-Composite Exhibit 3 hereto:•. + +16. The details of Wei fraudulent scheme are being revealed on a daily basis through various media rePorts.end court documents. The most recent estimate of the financial scope:oltheschernir Is.that•t'exceeds \$1.2. -billion dollars. + +17. Relevant to.this -station, EPSTEIN.is currently named as a defendantin three chili mittens alleging, inter Ulla, sexual: assault and battery•that were handled by RRA and Its attorneys including prior to its Implosion — one of which is filed• in federal court (Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 06-CIV-80893, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla.)(Jano Doe is a named Defendant herein), and two of which have been filed In state court In the le Judicial •CircultiCour1, .PainBeach County, State of Florlda,.(1..M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; E.W. v. Epstein, Case:No. 602008CA026058)000(MB + +.8 + +AM, (hereinafter colleCtively referred to as the 'Civil Actions," and 'L,NI is a named Defendant herein). The Civil Actions Were all filed In August and September of 2008. + +.18. What Is clear is that a fraudulent and Improper investment or Ponzl scheme was Intact conducted and operated by RRA and certain of the. named Defendants, which 'scheme dIrectlyImpacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. + +• 19; Miami etttithey.and\devetoper, Akin Sakowitz, was quatitl in a November 2009 tartialeasisaying,thatkie had met with ROTHSTEIN As.a,potential•iiiv.estor in August of 2009,.'but bet:eine suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a .Ponzi scheme and I notified the riBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN.was hiding behind a legitimate IOW firm to 'peddle fake Investments.' Attorney SakOwltz was also quoted .as saying had•Sbp.hitificated eavesdropping equIptnent and former law enforcement 0fficers whci would sift through a potential defendants' garbage looking for damaging evidence to:use.with ievestors"to show how potential defendants could be in estetice blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate darnage datal. + +20. Ft Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple \*Rothstein related Inveifori. Efelndicated in an article that RRA/Rothsteln had used the "Epstein Ploy .., Essehowplece astalL That's theway he ralsed.all the money. He would use...cases as bait for luring investors Into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there." In fact, on November 20, 2009, Valiant Scherer, on behalf of certain clients, filed a 147 page Complaint against .ROTHSTEIN; David Boden, Debra a Andrew Bamett, TD Bank, N.A., + +1 + +. • " + +Spinota, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzl scheme behind the RRA facade; and AS Of November 25, 2009, a 249 page Amended Complaint netting additional ..fyele'nciants was:11104 + +21, Inaddilleni• and Imervinformallon and\* belief, fROT:HSTEIN;Davld Bodani Debbie \alleges,. Andrew Barnett, Michael Platen and Kenneth Jetiita•(all employees of RRA) • -through• broker's or middlemen would stage regular. meetings during which false staternents were made about the number of caseskilents that existed or RRA had against EPSTEIN and the value thereof. They would show end share actual case files from the EPSTEiN aetiona with hedge fund managers. ThUS, the attorneys and clients haVe Wi3iVed any attorney-ell product.privileges.that othetwite may have existed. + +22. Because potential investors were given access to some of the actual Civil Action • Meg. Investor-third parties •may have. became aware of a name of an existing Plaintiff Who had filed anonymously against 'Epstein- and had opposed disclosure of her legal + +23. In all other Instances, by RRA, ROTHSTEIN and claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, they were able to effectively use initials, Jane Doe or other anonymous designations which was a key element in the frauduient scheme. Fictitious names could be .created to make the investors believe manyothor cases existed against Epstein. + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. +Page 10 + +24. In each of RRA's Civil Actions, the Plaintiffs are or were represented by RRA and its attorneys, including ROTHSTEIN and [REDACTED]. + +25. In addition, investors were told that in addition to the Civil Actions another fifty (50) plus anonymous females were represented by RRA, with the potential for hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements, and that RRA and its attorneys would sue Epstein unless he paid exorbitant-settlement amounts to protect his high-profile friends. + +26. Upon information and belief, [REDACTED] knew or should have known that ROTHSTEIN was utilizing RRA as a front for the massive Ponzi scheme and/or were selling an alleged interest or investment in the Civil Actions (and other claims) involving Epstein. + +27. Further evidencing that [REDACTED] (and possibly other attorneys of RRA) knew or should have known and participated in the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme, a front-page Palm Beach Post article; dated November 24, 2009, reported on the recent filing of an amended forfeiture complaint by prosecutors against "dozens of ROTHSTEIN's real estate properties, foreign cars, restaurants and other assets - including \$12 million in the lawyer's bank account in Morocco, along with millions more donated to political campaigns and charitable funds." The article further reported that - + +Attorney Scott ROTHSTEIN tapped into millions of dollars from his massive investment scam to cover payroll costs at his expanding Fort Lauderdale law firm, federal authorities said in court records released Monday. + +ROTHSTEIN's law firm (RRA) generated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70-lawyer law firm had a payroll of \$18 million, + +prosecutors said. ROTHSTEIN, who owned half of RRA used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said. + +Subsequent articles and court filings have reflected ROTHSTEIN received compensation in excess of \$35.7 million in 2008 and \$10.5 million in 2009, while his partner Rosenfeldt received greater than \$6 million in 2008. + +28. ROTHSTEIN attempted to lure the entity known as D3 Capital Club, LLC, ("D3"), by offering D3 "the opportunity" to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00 court settlement against EPSTEIN; yet this supposed settlement never existed and was entirely fabricated. To augment his concected story, ROTHSTEIN, upon information and belief, invited D3 to his office to view thirteen (13) banker's boxes of case files in Jane Doe (one of the Civil Actions)1 in an attempt to substantiate that the claims against EPSTEIN were legitimate and that the evidence obtained against him by RRA, ROTHSTEIN, and EDWARDS (the "Litigation Team") was real. + +29. Upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROTHSTEIN in making these offers by providing confidential, privileged and work-product information to prospective third-party investors. + +1 It appears that 13 out of the 40 boxes selected by the FBI as part of its investigation at RRA consisted of files relating to the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN, as reported by courtsel for the Bankruptcy Trustee. Until those boxes can be reviewed, as well as other discovery, Epstein will not know the depth of the fraud and those involved. + +• • • + +l + +90. By using the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN as 'bait' and fabricating sottlements :regarding same, ROTHSTEIN and others wore able to lure invest ' Into RQT146IttifS lair and bilked them of millions of dollars which, in turn, was used, fund rigairatilEPSTEIN for the sole purpose of continuing the massive Ponzi scheme. + +31. As part of this scheme, ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team, individually and in a concerted effort, may have unethically and Illegally: + +- a. .Sold, allowed to be sold and/ort tedwith the sale of an Interest In nonsettled personal injury laws (which are non-assignable and nontransferable) or sold non-existent structured settlements (including those ' cases involving Epstein); +- b. Reached akrellNents to share attorneys foes with non-lawyers; +- C. Used investorrponey to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; nducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conversations in violation of state or federal laws and Bar rules; and Utilized the judicial process including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery, for the sole purpose of furthering. the Pond scheme, + +32. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Toamrdlrectiy or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. +Page 13 + +including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules. + +33. Evidencing that the Litigation Team knew or should have known of the improper purpose that ROTHSTEIN was pursuing in the continuation of the scheme, ROTHSTEIN used RRA's Litigation Team in the EPSTEIN cases to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims pled in the Civil Actions, but significantly beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators. + +34. Upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN and others claimed their investigators discovered that there were high-profile individuals onboard Epstein's private jet where sexual assaults took place and showed D3 (and possibly others) copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries, and international figures. + +35. For instance, the Litigation Team relentlessly and knowingly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights EPSTEIN took with these famous individuals knowing full well that no underage women were onboard and no illicit activities took place. ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a calculated effort to bolster the marketing scam that was taking place. + +36. One of Plaintiffs' counsel, [REDACTED], deposed three of EPSTEIN'S pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot (currently serving in Iraq). The pilots were deposed by [REDACTED] for over twelve (12) hours, and [REDACTED] never asked one question relating to or about E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe (RRA clients) as it related to + +• + +• + +t + +transportation on flights of RRA clients on arty of EPSTEINTS:planes.. But EDWARDS asked many inflammatory and leading Irrelevant 'questions about tho pilots' thoughts and beliefs (Which will never be admissible at trial) which could only have been asked for the purposes of spUrnpIng• the eases and thus by using the. depoSigenslo sell the caSeis: (ora:part of them) to thIrd.panies. + +• C\_ 37. Because of these facts, ROTHSTEIN claimed" that Epttell•wanted to. make certain none of these individuals would be deposed and therefore he tad offered \$200,000,000.00 to settle the claims of RRAfemale dente various potential plaintiffs in .actions against EPSTEIN. The offer of a \$200 million dollar settlement by EPSTEIN was coMpletely fabricated; no such offer had overbear made. + +• 38. office also notified Defendant that he Intended to take the • depositions brand was subpoenaing: + +- (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); 09.Alan Dershowiti (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); I')Bititlintorr(Former"Preslaent of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former Presidentaf Sonyftecord); and +- (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). + +The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTEIN with whom he knew through business or philanthropic work over the years. None of the above-named individuals had any connection whatsoever with any of the Litigation • • Team's clients, E.W., L.M. or Jane Dee. + +40. EDWAMIS IBS amended .answers to \*InteringatOriOSM-the state court matters, E,W. and L.M.; and listed additionaltigh profile witnesses:that would allegedly be called at trial, Including; butnotilmited to: + +> (i). Bill (Governor of New Mexico, formerly U.S. Representative anciambassador to the United Nations); end (it): ny and all periOns havIng knowledge of EPSTEIN'S charitable, :political or other donations',2 + +41; The sole purpose of the schedulIng.of these depositions or listing high profile .friends/acquelntandas as potential witnesses was, again, to -pump' the cases to investors. Them .11 no evidence to. date that any of these individuals had or have any knowledge- regarding .FiRA's civa Actions. + +. . + +42. In furtherance of their metal and fraudulent scherhe against EPSTEIN, ROTHSTEINLEDWARDS (whomither know or shouldhaVa known) and, at times, L.M. In her Clvilactionagalpst EPSTEIN: + +- (sv a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal -action In + - excess of \$50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the Jurisdictionallimits.. + - b) Organized ii Janetioa TV media Interview without any legitimate legal purpose other than to 'pump" the federal case for potential + +777 + +2These .high-profile celcbribif 'purported" witnesses have no personal knowledge regarding the facts on these 'Three Cases', but wore being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass end intimidate them and Epstein, and to add star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzl scheme. + +• investors or to prejudice -Epsteln's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County, ' + +- Berger and Adler (another named partner in BRA) an attended EPSTEIN% deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN \*Web had no bearing on the case, but so that the-video and questions could be shown to investors. Cendueted and attempted to conduct completely irrelevant disdoyeryinireleted to iho cleans In or subject matter of the Civil Aetlons forthe purpose of-harassing and entbarrassing witnesses and EPSTEN and causing EPSTEIN to spend tens of thousands Af :dollars In unnecessary attorneys' fees and costs defending' what appeared to be discovery-related to the Civil Actions but was entirely telatedlo the furtherance of the PorS scheme. +- 4 Ater was recruited and joined RFtA•lh the spring of 2609, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases. Against -EPSTEIN used by Attorney and Berger changed dramatically In addressing the court on various motions from being substantive the facts pled to ridiculously Inflammatory and sound-bite rich such as the "July 31, 2009, transcript- when stated to the Court in E.W./L.M.; \*What the evidence Is really going to show Is that Mr. Epstein —At least dating back as + +• • + +far as our Investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of hls Efe, made an attempt to sexually. abuse children. We're not talking about fi & ivtiA not talking about-20, we're not talking about 100, are of talking about 400, Alch, I believe, Is' thefttUtzbermknown to laW enforcement, we are talking about sands of children: ...and it is through a very intricate at lcated system that he devised where he has as many eisiikpeople working underneath him that he is paying Weil to schadule.ffiese appointments, to locate those girls .° + +- (d\- . V +- f) As an tiea pVVARDS filed an unsupportable and legally deficloilotion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of fusses, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of lizoEpstein, and to Post .a \$15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (I.e., to "pump" the cases for Investor following). However, the Court found Plaintiff's motion entirely devoid of evidence ... ", and denied the motion in tote. + - g) ROTHSTEIN told investors he, had another 52 females that he represented, and that Epstein had offered \$200 million to resolve, + +but that he could settle,.confidently, these cases for \$600 million, separate and apart from his legal foes. + +- h) ROTHSTEIN and the Litigation Team knew or should have known that their three (3) filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following maser-is: C i . + +(I) L.M. — testified she • had any type of sex with Epstein; worked at nu rous. strip clubs; is an admitted prostitute and call girt; hes a history of illegardrug use (pot, painkillers, Xanax, Ecstasy); and .continually asserted the 5th Amendment during her depositions in order.to avoid answering a, 'For example, In her swam statement to the FBI, L.M. was insistent that "Jeffrey Is an awesome man' (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hoPe Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it really would be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an awes 0 'and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing," (pp. 57-58 - FBI). licOact, L.M. spoke so highly of EPSTEIN and her Interactions with film that the US Attorney's office informed a federal court in July 2008 that the • US Attorney could not consider L.M. a + +s<1 ' Yet, by September 24, 2009, the data on which L.M. began her deposition In her chill action and now represented by RRA and EDWARDS, L.M.'s new and very different tale about purported sexual misconduct under the supposed Influence of EPSTEIN had been thoroughly rehearsed and her role into the ROTHSTEIN scam was complete. In her deposition In her civil action, L.M. declared that: + +"I, I don't really care about money." (DT 208:8) + +"Ile needs time in Jail. He doesn't want to be.— this Is not right for him to be on the streets living daily.. ." (DT 219:21-23) + +• • + +"You• don't think my whole life -1 have lived that shitty life because of Jeffrey Epstein? (DT 222:7-8) + +- b. In her sworn FBi testimony (pa and RRA). L.M. was emphatic that her Interactions with Epstein Involved no Inappropriate 46\*al tbiicfiingih anyway: In fact, It was exacttythe opposite: + +GI! Did he at any point kiss you, touch yet, show any kind of affection toviards you? + +A: Never, never. (p. 21 — F + +o; So ha never pulled ybu Cbser to hlin'in a sexual way? + +A: I wish. NO, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome men, no. (p.21 -FBi) . + +Yet, L.M. filed her second amended complaIntin April 2009, Sifter Joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN In 's complaint beCame.even more salacious. in paragraph 12 of LM.'s Second Amended Complaint, LM. alleges among other things, that + +"Jeffrey Epstein coerced, Induced, or enticed . .the then minor. Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexual misconduct. These acts Included, but wore not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and Illegal sexual touching of the then minor Plaintiff, forcing or Inducing the then minor plaintiff into oral sex or other sexual misconduct..." + +. % + +I + +- c. fiCher sworn FBI statement (pre- I and RRA), LM. testified that the individual who first brought LM. to EPSTEIN's home, told LM. 'Make sure you're 18 because Jeffrey dogma want any Underage (p. 8 - FBI). + +O 'C + +Yet at her September, 2009 depositio Dacdr represented by .• + +EDWARDS and RRA,.L.M. told a very different story: + +Q: My question was what did Carolyn tell you to tell Mr. Epstein about your age? + +A: She said it didn't matter. + +•Q: That's your recollection about what she said? + +A: Yes, she Said — I remember her saying it doesn't matter. Den't worry about It. + +(DT 19940-25) + +- d. Pre:EDWARDS and RRA, L.M. testified to the FBI :1 always made had a fake ID, anyways saying that I was 18." (p...8 - FBI). + +,A\$ 'Yet, when questioned about her fake ID et her September 2009 depo, she stated: + +0: .And did you havo.a fake ID? + +A:No: + +Q: Have you aver had a fake ID? \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a639723eba5c076348f35b89a814aa519d9e104a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273/EFTA02762273.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1392 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762273.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 32, + "chars": 53013, + "elapsed_seconds": 16.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.2031555175781, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 392.2031555175781, + 232.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 232.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.296, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 492.04800000000006, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 492.04800000000006, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 280.296, + 170.1 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.892, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 326.808, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 326.808, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 269.892, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMARY OF ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 475.4699999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 381.91729736328125, + 613.98 + ], + [ + 381.91729736328125, + 627.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 627.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 428.4117126464844 + ], + [ + 379.26788330078125, + 428.4117126464844 + ], + [ + 379.26788330078125, + 441.570556640625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 441.570556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762273" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3c06d96e8aa108f3b7235603e4cf30468a0caeb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.md @@ -0,0 +1,896 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +## PART 6 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI EIN'S APPENDIX OF BUS MOTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E in support of his revised Omnibus Motiop4 : tein") files this Appendix of Documents + +Co s + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 1/5/11 | Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 195) | +| 2 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32); Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 3 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 4 | 4/30/09 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 148, 151-152); E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Asserts, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165); Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 6 | 11/5/09 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, etc. (D.E. 400) Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED] | +| 7 | 7/22/09 | Letters from [REDACTED] re depositions | +| 8 | 7/27/09 | Complaint (D.E. 1)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 9 | N/A | Court Docket
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM | +| 10 | 8/11/09
8/24/09 | Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM | +| 11 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land (D.E. 143)
E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | +| 12 | 8/24/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and David Hart Rogers (D.E. 159)
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein ; 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | +| 13 | 11/3/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - Scott Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true | +| 14 | 11/6/09 | Article: New Times Broward-Palm Beach - Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | +| 15 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 16 | 11/12/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel - FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 11/20/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 3)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 18 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14)
United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action);
S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ | +| 19 | 11/23/09 | Article: South Florida Sun-Sentinel – You're in a town full of thieves | +| 20 | 11/24/09 | Article: The Miami Herald – Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries at law firm | +| 21 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 12)
Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein
17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE | +| 22 | 12/1/09 | Information (D.E. 1)
United States v. Rothstein ; S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC | +| 23 | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) (D.E. 5) | +| 24 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Ep [REDACTED] (D.E. 931) | +| 25 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. Edwards' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 163-164, 166, 227-229, 259-260, 276-278, 321-322, 338-339) | +| 26 | 3/23/10 | Bradley J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 112, 116-117, 123-125, 230-231) | +| 27 | 10/10/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 205) | +| 28 | 7/26/09
8/13/09
10/23/09 | Email from Pricilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein
Email from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Priscilla Nascimento
Email from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 29 | 6/14/12 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 23-26, 52-53) | + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | 12/12/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp. 59-62); | +| 31 | 12/21/11 | Scott Rothstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (p. 2278) | +| | | Razorback Funding. LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. | +| 32 | 3/17/10 | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition Transcript Excerpts (pp 1 14, 19- | +| | | 20, 23, 25-26, 28-34, 36-39, 48-55, 57, 59-60, 62-69, 6-80, | +| 33 | 11/9/17 | Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 10 | +| 34 | 11/15/17 | Epstein's Objections to A e ed Exhibit List | +| 35 | 11/9/17 | Seventh Amended emental Witness List | +| 36 | 1/25/12 | Jeffrey Epstein's Depv n Transcript Excerpts (pp. 19-21) | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 21, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**APP. 23** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +A:•No. + +(DT 30b:5-8)r + +e. tn her FBI statement (pre-EDWARDS and 'IRRA), L.M. lestlfied about otlieis L.M. brought to the Epstein hoMe..L.Mi testified that women she brought to home were eagerbrihe 0pp:wit/nit, andtentent with their experiences: + +> A: None of my girls ever had a problem and they'd call me. They'd beg me, you know, for 40 to go to Jeffb30 house because they IS Jeffrey. Jeffrey le nian. 'Ho really Is. mean, and he all thought we were of ego always. This fe whars sesad about. (p 30-Fg N87 + +CI: any dYthe girls complain about What happened after they left there + +- No. You asked methat question. No, everybody loved Jeffrey. ' fp. 44 - FBI) + +A: Every girl that I brought to Jeffrey, they said they were fine with It. and Ilke for example [E.W. — another of RRA's clients In the CM Actions), a lot of girls begged me to bring them back for the money. And as far as I know, we all had fun there. (p.'45 - FBI) • + +7 + +Yet, with and RRA as her attorneys,' L.M. did a 180' et her September; 2009 deposition in saying: . + +> A: . . . Once they were there, they were scared ou oftheir\*Ind. They did It Ynyways and some .of them walked an aid LM. t\ fre don't ever do this to me again. That:wee the-worst thing that ever happened to die. (DT 170:8-11) + +... A: And then, a tot of girls weren't comfortable. (DT 17t13) + +f. The above represent only a few of the dramatic changes L.M. made In her testimony prior to her representation by RRA and after she hired ROTHSTEIN, and RM. + +48. As a result of the fraudulent Investment or (Renzi) scheme, L.M. may knowingly have compromised her alleged interests'in her Civil Action, or committed a fraud on the court. + +49. RRA and the Litigation Team took an emotionally driven set of facts 'involving alleged innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and •a Palm Beach Billionaire and sought to turn it into a gold mine. Rather than evaluating and resolving the cases based • on the merits (i.e. facts) which Included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by each of the claimants and substantial pre-Epstein psychological and emotional conditions of each of the claimants and substantial sexual experiences pre-Epstein, RRA and The Litigation Team sought through protective orders and objections to block relevant discovery regarding their claimants. They Instead forged ahead with discovery the main purpose of which was to pressure Epstein into settling the cases. . . + +Fortunately, their ladles have not been successful. As Magistrate Judge Linnea valet° in a discovery order dated•September 15, 2009 (DE 299 in Federtil Case #08480119)harlenyIng Plaintiffs' Motion-fOr Protective Order + +"This IS his [Epstein's! right. The Record in this case Is clear that•the childhood of manta the Piatnfiffs was marred by instances of abuse and neglect, which In tam may have 'resulted, In whole or id part, in the damages claimed by the Pffgritiffs,°\* + +addition, In :an Omnibus Order dated Oc!ober, 28, 2009 (DE 377 In Federal Case uosascillo) Iviaglitrate'Judge Linnea Johnsonwrote: + +• "Here the request atastie goesto the very heart of the Plaintiff's damage claims, requesting riot only general Information relating lo Plaintiffs.sexual history, but Inquiring as to Specific indtandes wherein Plaintiff received compensation or consideration for sex acts, claim other mates sexually assaulted, battered, or abtites her, ahri/ortraim other males committed lewd or lascivious acts•on her. As a global matter, Plaintiffs clearly and unequivocally place their sexual history In issue by their allegations that Epstein's actions in this case• has negatively affected their relationships by, among other things, "distrust in men," 'sexual timacy problems," diminished trust," "social problems,' " problems in personal relationships,'" feeling of stress around men," "premature teenage pregnancy, "antisocial behaviors," and 'hyper-sexuality and promiscuity." Considering these allegation, there simply can be no question that Epstein is entitled to know whetherPleintlffs were molested or the subject of other "sexual activity' or "lewd + +• + +.4 + +and lascivious .conduct" In order to .determine whether there is an .alternative basis Eifthe psychokigleal disorders Plaintiffs claim to have sustained, whether Plaintiffs engaged In prostitution or other similar type acts .and.hew certain•acts alleged bi ins Goi ttaint materially affected Plaintiffs' reiatlettahips.wlth.others or how those acts didnot hew) such an affect on those relationships:and/or whether Plaintiffs Suffered from.the alleged emotional and psychological dlsorders'as a result of other sexual acts prior to the acts a• lleged in. the Complaint To deny 'Epstein thus discovery, would be tantamount to barring' him from mounting a •ciefenseik'' + +.50. ROTHSTEIN, an Ul.'s actions constitute a fraud upon EPSTEIN Eli PIRA, ROTHSTEIN and the beam represented.themselves to be acting In • good faith and with the.beets Inters of their clients in mind at all times wherrin reality, they were..acting In -furtherance of the Investment or Ponzl scheme described herein. EPSTEIN justifiably. relied to his detriment on the representations of RRA, and pefendants, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M. as to how he conducted aniidetended ' the 014Actions brought against him. + +4. feitct dfre and proximate result of the fraudulent and illegal Investment or Ponzl ordhestrated by.ROTHSTEIN and as yet other unknown co-conspirators and as .a Jesuit of the litigation tactics undertaken by the Litigation Team and L.M. as set forth herein, Plaintiff •EPSTEIN has incurred and continues to Incur the monetary damages ▪ **including, but not limited to, having to pay an amount in excess of the Civil Actions' true volt\* as a result of them refusing to settle In that a percentage of any payment by** + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. +Page 30 + +EPSTEIN may have been promised to third party investors; incurring significant additional legal fees and costs as result of Defendants refusal to conduct settlement negotiations in a forthright and good faith manner because any monies paid by EPSTEIN is in reality a promised return on an investment; and incurred significant attorneys' fees and costs in defending the discovery that was not relevant, material and/or calculated to lead to the admissibility of evidence, but which was done for the sole purpose of "pumping" the cases to investors. + +52. EPSTEIN has also been injured in that the scope of the fraudulent and criminal or racketeering activity so permeated the RRA law firm that EPSTEIN has been prevented from fully and fairly defending the civil actions brought against him. In essence, the very existence of RRA was based on the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTH [REDACTED] and other co-conspirators. In order to continue to bring in monies from investors, ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators used the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN, along with other manufactured lawsuits, as a means of obtaining massive amounts of money. + +53. ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN - individually, and jointly and severally. + +County - Violation of §§ 772.104, et as cf., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act - Against All Defendants + +54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. +Page 31 + +55. RRA, ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M. each and collectively constitute an enterprise pursuant to §772.102(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). + +56. ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M. engaged in a pattern of criminal activity as defined in §772.102(3) and (4), Fla. Stat. (2009). + +57. As alleged herein, [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] committed multiple predicate acts in violation of §772.103(1), (2), (3) and (4), Fla. Stat., including violations of Florida Statutes - Chapter 517, relating to securities transactions; Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices, false pretenses, and fraud generally (which includes L.M.); Chapter 831, relating to forgery; §836.05, relating to extortion (which includes L.M.); and Chapter 837, relating to perjury (which includes L.M.). Substantially more than two predicate acts (i.e., the selling of or participation of the sale of fabricated settlements outlined herein, including the Civil Actions involving Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. + +58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. + +59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to threefold of his actual damages sustained, reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, and such other damages as allowed by law. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for damages against all the named Defendants. + +Count II - Florida RICO +"Ricketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act" +Pursuant to §§895.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2009). +Against All Defendants + +k + +) + +60. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if ftilly t forth .herein. + +SI. RRA, along with ROTHSTEIN, and L.M., each actively, conetifute einanterpdse pigeoaritto.§.805.02(a),.Fla. Stat. (2009).,\_ + +62. During all .times- relevant. hereto( ROTHSTEIN, MCItl •L.M. were and are aisoclatert with the enterprise, RRA, and eachalher. + +63. Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, and LM., as persons associated with the enterprise, RRA and-each other (as an ante e), unlawfully conducted or participated, directly or fndirect1y; in such an ente laugh a pattern of racketeering, § B95.43(3), Fla. Stet, as alleged above-herein. + +64. The -breadth. and scope of ROTHSTEIN, and; colonially, L.M.'s racketeering activity continues to be investigated by the FBI, as numerous civil lawsuits against some of the Defendants and others continue to be filed by persons who have • been damaged. As \*of the flung Of this Complaint, criminal charges have only been • brought against ROTHSTEIN. + +. 65: Substantially more than two predicate acts. (i.e., the selling of fabricated sottlementsautlined herein, including-the Civil Adkins involving Epstein as well as the Improper litigation Waits outlined above) occurred-within a five year time period. + +• 66. Pursuant to §895.02, Fla. Stat., ROTHSTEIN and engaged in a pattern of 'racketeering activity' through the commission of crimes as defined In § 895.02(1)(a)-(b), Fla.'Stat, Including Chapter 617, relating to securities; Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices, false pretenses, and fraud (including L.M.) generally; + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. +Page.33 + +Chapter 813, relating to forgery; §836.05, relating to extortion (including L.M.); Chapter 837, relating to perjury (including L.M.). + +67. Pursuant to §895.05, Fla. Stat., Plaintiff seeks the following relief against Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M.: + +1. a) Ordering ROTHSTEIN and [REDACTED] to divest themselves of any interest in the enterprise, RRA; +2. b) Enjoin all Defendants from engaging in the same type of conduct and activities as described herein; and +3. c) Temporarily enjoining ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M., from the continuation of the Civil Actions brought against EPSTEIN until criminal charges have been formally brought against RRA and/or any of the Defendants, such that EPSTEIN may be allowed to evaluate whether a stay or dismissal of all Civil Actions against him is merited. + +68. EPSTEIN further seeks an award of his reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and such other relief that this Court deems appropriate. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for the relief sought and damages against the named Defendants. + +Count III - Abuse of Process - +Against All Defendants + +69. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. + +• • I. + +70. After Instituting the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN, the actions of Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, and LM. as alleged in paragraphs 9 through 58 :herein, constitute an illegal, Improper or perverted use of process. + +ROTFISTEIN, -.and L.M. possessed utterior.rnotives or purpo.ses in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of placebo, + +72. As a result -of ROTHSTEIN,. and LM.'s a STEIN suffered" • damages: + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a Judgment.for ,dariaieges against all this named' Defendants + +## trd Ants\* All t7standants + +75. Plaintiff realleges and Incorporates paragraphs through-63 as if•fully set forth. herein. + +64<) \ 74. ROTHST.EIN,. b and through Defendant and. LM. made false 'statements of fad to EPSTEIN and his attorneys and agents, -known-to-13018'5e at the time made, and/or Intentionally concealed material information from EPSTEIN' and his attorneys and agents, for the purpose of Inducing.EPSTEN toadtin reliance 'Monson. + +75. EPSTEIN did so act on the misrepresentation• and/or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the chill actions whereas In realitt, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and overkalued•so as to lure additional Investors and 'to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to continue the massive fraud. + +Epstein v. RRA, et al. + +Page 35 + +WHEREFORE Plaintiff EPSTEIN demands judgment against Defendants for damages incurred and for any other relief to which he is entitled under the law. + +Conspiracy to Commit Fraud, +Against All Defendants + +76. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53, and 74 and 75 as if fully set forth herein. + +77. ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M. conspired to commit a fraud upon EPSTEIN. + +78. ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M. combined by and through concerted action as detailed herein to accomplish an unlawful purpose or accomplish some purpose by unlawful means. The unlawful purpose was, among other things, the orchestrating and continuation of the massive fraudulent Ponzi scheme and receipt of monies for the continuation of the scheme. The unlawful means includes, but is not limited to, the use of the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN in an unlawful, improper, and fraudulent manner. + +79. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED] and L.M.'s conspiracy to defraud EPSTEIN, EPSTEIN suffered damages. + +WHEREFORE Plaintiff EPSTEIN demands judgment against Defendants for damages incurred and for any other relief to which he is entitled under the law. + +Jury Trial + +Plaintiff demands Jury Trial on all issues so triable. + +![]()**Epstein v. RRA, et al.** +**Page 38** + +[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com) +**MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.** +**Florida Bar #617298** +[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com) + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN** +**303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400** +**West Palm Beach, FL 33401** +**561-842-2820** +**Fax 561-253-0164** +**(Attorneys for Plaintiff)** + +**NOT A CERTIFIED COPY** + +**APP. 24** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. EDWARDS, individually. + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. + +AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +The undersigned, Jeffrey E. Epstein, having first been duly sworn, hereby deposes and says: + +1. 1. I am over eighteen, (18) years old and have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, +2. 2. I am the Counter-Defendant in the above captioned action (the "Action") and submit this Affidavit in support of my Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Summary Judgment Motion") with respect to the Fourth Amended Counterclaim (the "Counterclaim") of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards (██████████). +3. 3. In his Counterclaim, ██████████ has a sole, unsupported claim against me for Malicious Prosecution. +4. 4. As more fully described below, at the time that I commenced the Action against ██████████ Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") in December 2009, I had a good faith basis for filing the same, based on the facts that existed at the time I filed suit, as set forth below and more fully in my Summary Judgment Motion. + +5. I filed the Action against Rothstein and [REDACTED] because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my original Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm (the "Ponzi Scheme") that featured the very civil cases litigated against me by Edwards, which were being used to defraud potential investors in the Ponzi Scheme. + +6. In early November 2009, stories in the press, on the news, and on the internet were legion about the implosion of RRA, the Ponzi Scheme perpetrated at that firm, and the misuse in the Ponzi Scheme of certain civil cases then being litigated against me by RRA partner, Edwards. The cases Edwards was litigating against me, which are described in the Summary Judgment Motion (the "Epstein Cases"), were being used to defraud investors out of millions of dollars and to fund the RRA Ponzi Scheme. + +7. In November 2009, I also became aware of news stories that as a result of the Ponzi scheme at RRA, the Florida Bar had commenced investigations into over one-half of the attorneys employed by RRA. + +8. At or about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, *Razorback Funding, LLC; et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein; et al.*, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi Scheme investors. + +9. Upon reviewing the Razorback Complaint, I learned that the Razorback Complaint detailed the use of the Epstein Cases (i.e., the cases being litigated against me + +by [REDACTED] to defraud investors in the Ponzi Scheme; including, but not limited to, improper discovery practices and other methods to bolster the cases. + +10. Prior to my filing the initial Complaint in the Action, I also became aware that the Federal government filed an Information against Scott Rothstein, which included allegations of RRA as an "Enterprise" in which Rothstein and his yet unidentified co-conspirators engaged in a racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, mail and wire fraud, conspiracy, and wire fraud, and specifically alleged that (a) potential investors were defrauded by Rothstein and other co-conspirators who falsely advised that confidential settlement agreements were available for purchase, when the settlement agreements offered were fabricated; (b) the fabricated settlements agreements were allegedly available in amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars and could be purchased at a discount and repaid to the investors at face value over time; (c) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized the offices of RRA and the offices of other co-conspirators to convince potential investors of the legitimacy of the and success of the law firm, which enhanced the eredibility of the purported investment opportunity in these fictitious settlements; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salaries and bonuses, and to acquire larger and more elaborate office space and equipment in order to enrich the personal wealth of persons employed by and associated with the RRA Enterprise. + +11. Prior to filing the initial Complaint in the Action, consistent with the allegations made by the press, in the Razorback Complaint, and in the Rothstein. + +federal compliant againsbne on prosecuting a ease against against . e . 12. Equally consistent with the allegations p d in the Razorback Complaint that the Epstein.Cases were being.deli for purposes unrelated to the litigation in order to lure investors ititri4\ 53 Schenie is the fact tharon July 24. 2009. filed a. two hundred I ' rt 4) page, one. fitly-six 1156). count • laintifiel.M. for whom was already court involving the same matters alleged in the federal complaint:. The, t was filed in federal court. but was never served on me or prosecuted. lead 0 conclude that the only reason it was filed was to enhance the case files offices of RRA to potential investora in the Pond Scheme.. + +Information, it was clear that the activity in the Epstein Cases being litigated:by intensified substantially during Rte.short six (6) months during which was a parniet at RRA from April 2009 through.the end of October 2009. Furthermore, during that six (6)-month period. questionable discovery like that detailed in the Razorback Complaint had taken phice.in the Epstein Cases being litigated against me by Ed including noticing the depositions of famous dignitaries and celebriti Bill Clinton and. David Coppertield. However. the plaintiffs in thelEps made no allegations of improper conduct against them.implicatin rides oi• dignikarles. + +• so while .4 partner. at RRA. • filed a motion in Federal court in nested that the court order me. Ripest a fittemmillion dollar bond in the Jane wise. Thisease. nceording lo the Razorback Complaint, was being loafed at that same titntto•investors'.in the P.otizi Scheme,. In conneotion.With that motion, filed papers discussing my net worth and filed supplemental papers purporting to list in great detail my vehicles, planes and other items of substantial value, all at a time when. according to the + +accounts in the press. the Informatiouand the Razorback Complaint. the Ponzi Scheme was unraveling and the need for new Investors In the Ponzi Scheme was becoming urgent. The court rejected the Motion, calling it "devoid of evidence + +14. The facts set forth above and in the.SumntarY Judgnient Motion were the facts upon which I relied in (a) determining that I had incurred damages, such attorneys fees and disbursements paid to defend against abusive litigation practic • eh appehred to be Unrelated to the underlying litigation against me. and (blasseLn causes of action against Edwards and Rothstein in the Action. + +FURTHER AFFIANT SA Y ITH NAUGHT. + +STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOR + +Sworn and subscribt .9An this June,...: t-J.1 . N IL before me, the undersigned authority, by Jeffrey Epstein, + +r ice\ + +pkt.) + +coliaRVbPUBL N A I 404 1 1del/ + +HAMM AVOW NOTARY PUELIC•STATE OF NEW YORK No, 01AV6313116 Qualified In Richmond Counly My Commission Expkos October 14, 2016 + +**APP. 25** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; +██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLUME I + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION + +OF + +(BRADLEY) (EDWARDS) + +Taken on Behalf of Plaintiff + +Friday, November 10th (2017) + +10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. ██████████ + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 471-2995 + +1 "discovered that there were high-profile witnesses + 2 onboard Epstein's private jet where some of the + 3 alleged sexual assaults took place, and showed D3" -- + 4 the potential investors -- "copies of a flight log + 5 --" Right? + +6 A Yeah. + +7 Q -- "purportedly containing names of + 8 celebrities, dignitaries and international figures." + +9 A Right. + +10 Q Did the flight log in fact contain names of + 11 celebrities? + +12 A Epstein's flight log does contain names of + 13 celebrities. Those are the people he hung out with. + +14 Q And dignitaries? + +15 A What's the definition of dignitary? I think + 16 so. + +17 Q Good enough for me. + 18 And international figures. + +19 A Yes. + +20 Q (SO (there (is (some (truth (that (Rothstein (is + (21) (weaving (in) (based (on (documents) (the (flight (log (that + (22) (was (obtained (by (you (as (the (lead (trial (lawyer (in (the + (23) (pending (lawsuits?) + +(24) (A) (There (is (some (truth (in (the (pending (lawsuits?) + +(25) (Q) (NO. (I'm (saying (that (what (Rothstein (was + +1 (doing) (--) (we) (all) (--) + +2 (A) (He) (used) (actual) (evidence) (to) (support) (a) + +3 (fabricated) (story). + +4 (Q) (And) (the) (actual) (evidence) (that) (was) (referred) + +5 (to) (here) (are) (these) (flight) (logs) (that) (you) (as) (the) (lead) + +6 (lawyer) (obtained) (and) (brought) (back) (to) (the) (Rothstein) + +7 (firm), (right)? + +8 (A) (I) (maintain) (the) (evidence) (for) (all) (of) (my) (cases) + +9 (at) (the) (Rothstein) (firm) (where) (I) (worked), (yes). + +10 (Q) (That's) (all) (I) (was) (confirming). + +11 (A) (Does) (it) (appear) (that) (Rothstein) (gained) (access) + +12 (to) (it) (and) (used) (it) (to) (support) (his) (fairytale)? (It) (does). + +13 (Q) (It) (does), (right)? (And) (you) (agree) (with) (that). + +14 (A) (Yes). + +15 Q So paragraph 41. + +16 A Yes. + +17 Q In this case, Razorback -- this is not + +18 Mr. Epstein's suit, right? This is Bill Scherer + +19 representing the Razorback client that he represented + +20 suing Rothstein is making these allegations? + +21 A Yes. + +22 Q Right? Okay. + +23 So Mr. Scherer -- do you know Mr. Scherer? + +24 A I know him now better than I did then. I + +25 didn't know him at all then. + +1 underaged women were onboard." There were underage + 2 women onboard. Epstein knew that. So he knows this to + 3 be false. "And no elicit activities took place." + 4 Epstein knows elicit activities took place on his + 5 airplane, so he knows that to be false. + +6 He can't just adopt what Bill Scherer says + 7 and say, █, that forms the basis of something I + 8 believe. It can't possibly form the basis of what + 9 he believes, because he knows it to be false. + +10 Q (Okay.) (So (did (any) (of (the (three (clients (that + (11) (you (represented (while (you (were (at (Mr. Rothstein's + (12) (testified (that (they (went (on (Mr. Epstein's (plane?) + +(13) (A) (They (were (not (three (of (-- (they (were (not (on + (14) (Mr. Epstein's (plane.) (They (were (not (the (victims (on (the + (15) (plane.) + +(16) (Q) (So (the (clients (that (you (represented (-- (you + (17) (individually (while (at (the (Rothstein (firm (-- (your + (18) (three (clients (testified (or (admitted (that (they (never + (19) (traveled (on (Mr. Epstein's (plane, (correct?) + +(20) (A) (If (they (testified (truthfully, (they (would (say + (21) (that.) (I (just (don't (remember (if (they (were (asked (that + (22) (question.) + +23 Q But you know the question is -- + +24 A I do know the answer to that question for + 25 sure. + +1 the many topics that, amongst plaintiffs' + 2 counsel, we discussed as the way in which + 3 Epstein intended to ultimately defeat these + 4 cases, which would ultimately prove his + 5 serial sexual molestation of minors. + +6 BY MR. LINK: + +7 Q So is your concern something that's + 8 evidence? + +9 A And we had a source telling us our concern + 10 was true. + +11 Q I understand. + +12 A Okay, so -- + +13 Q (I) (have) (heard) (about) (the) (source.) (I) (am) (asking) + 14 (you) (about) (evidence.) (You) (told) (me) (you) (had) (concerns.) + 15 (Okay,) (I) (don't) (know) (that) (a) (federal) (judge) (cares) (about) + 16 (your) (personal) (concerns.) (I) (doubt) (that) (a) (federal) (judge) + 17 (cares) (that) (you) (have) (a) (source) (who) (won't) (get) (on) (the) + 18 (stand.) + +19 (So) (whenever) (I) (have) (filed) (a) (motion) (for) + 20 (in) (junction,) (I) (intend) (to) (put) (evidence) (on) (in) (front) (of) + 21 (the) (court.) (And) (I'm) (asking) (you,) (sir,) (what) (evidence) + 22 (did) (you) (have) (in) (this) (federal) (proceeding) (to) (prove) + 23 (your) (statement) (that) (Mr.) (Epstein) (was) (fraudulently) + 24 (transferring) (his) (assets) (overseas?) + +25 (MR.) (SCAROLA): (Excuse) (me.) (I'm) (going) (to) + +1(object) to (Counsel's) speech about (Counsel's) + +2(experience.) Move that it be stricken. + +3(And the question as to what evidence) + +4(did Mr. [REDACTED] have [REDACTED]) + +5(MR. LINK:) Yes. + +6(MR. SCAROLA:) [REDACTED] is a question that has + +7been asked and answered repeatedly. + +8(BY MR. LINK:) + +9(Q) (So would you agree you had no admissible + +10(evidence) at the time that you filed this pleading?) + +11(A) (Hold on one second.) (So [REDACTED]) + +12(Q) (Yes,) (Sir.) + +13(A) [REDACTED] this is evidence. + +14(Q) (What is it?) + +15(A) (In request for admission [REDACTED] asked) + +16(Mr. Epstein [REDACTED]) + +17(Q) (Yes.) + +18(A) [REDACTED] admit you are moving (financial) assets + +19(overseas) outside of the direct territorial reach of the + +20(US and Florida courts.) + +21(Question 22) you were making asset + +22(transfers) with the intent to defeat any judgment + +23(that might) be entered against you in this case or + +24(similar cases.) + +25(Twenty-three,) do you currently have the + +1 (ability to post @ \$15 million bond to satisfy @ + 2 (judgment in this case without financial or other + 3 difficulty?) + +4 (Q Uh-huh.) + +5 (A If he told the truth, he would have said yes.) + +6 And that is what the adverse inference requirement + +7 allows for us to draw when he says in response to those + +8 direct requests for admissions that he's invoking his + +9 Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, which + +10 is tantamount to an admission. So that is evidence. + +11 (Q Okay. So you think that the adverse + +12 inference -- + +13 (A That's going to happen in this case, too.) + +14 Q Hang on. Let me just make sure I + 15 understand. + +16 You thought when you filed this that + 17 having an adverse inference to a question -- + 18 whatever question you asked -- because he raised the + 19 Fifth, makes it an admission? That's your + 20 understanding of an adverse inference in federal + 21 court? + +22 A I had an admission by Mr. Epstein in response + 23 to his question. + +24 Q That was it? You told me he pled the Fifth + 25 and didn't answer. All I'm asking is, was it your + +2 BY MR. LINK: + +4 Q And this is a memo from him to you copying Marc Nurik. firm? Marc Nurik was a lawyer at Rothstein's + +6 A One of the criminal defense lawyers. + +8 Q And it's references Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution agreement? + +9 A That's what it looks like. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Q And it looks like it's Mr. Adler to you. Says, "Brad age from Black and i just had a great conversati w Marc Nurik about the non-prosecution agr apt, and I need you to please get in contac it arc and meet with him to discuss the poss Bring with you a copy of the agreement. + +17 18 19 20 ext sentence says, "We also discussed the assets itu ion and there are some major ies that need to be explored with Marc and le + +21 "Get on it" exclamation point. + +22 (Were)@MI (reportInq)(C) tr= (Karen in 01-0-70 + +219 (represent) (the)(three)Prolerstelr,(clients (the)Prim) + +Q3) ardrel)(=CI(lrelq (C) 1prosecute)cam(Eps emn WatreTI?) + +Q.0 • a e (tin) (Eigil)C) (data (AW11. (8th) 0195) C) + +for identification.) + +1 (I) had (just) started at the firm. (I) had (just) got there. + +2 (Russ Adler was one of the only lawyers + +3 (that) (I) had known for years before (I) got to the firm. + +4 (And) Russ Adler handled sexual abuse cases. (So,) + +5 (especially) in the beginning, (I) talked to Russ about + +6 how to kind of navigate through the complications + +7 with Jeffrey Epstein and with the type of defense + +8 that was going on. (So this (just) appears that wayne + +9 Black and Russ Adler -- wayne was the + +10 (investigator) -- that they were talking also about + +11 how to -- what we needed to do in the investigation. + +12 (Yeah,) Russ was definitely involved then. + +13 (He didn't do much in the day-to-day,) so (I) don't want + +14 to say anything to that. + +15 (Q) (I) understand. But (I'm talking about) on + +16 April 8th, 2009, (it looks) to me (like) he's giving you + +17 instructions on what to do. Do you agree? + +18 (A) Not giving me instructions on what to do. (I) + +19 mean, he's telling me bring Marc Nurik the + +20 non-prosecution agreement, is the instruction. + +21 (If) anything, we are working together with + +22 the common goal. + +23 Q The get on it, exclamation point -- + +24 A We're buddies. Then we were just friends. + +25 Get on it is let's do this. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A was on the airplane with Jeffrey Epstein and an underaged girl. Jeffrey Epstein makes the allegation in the complaint that the proof that Brad was pumping a Ponzi scheme is that he sought flight logs, despite knowing that there were no underaged girls on the airplane. Jeffrey Epstei new that to be false, because there were indeed g ag d girls on the airplane. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 0 To the extent that Jeffrey Ep tei himself won't say that I knowingly filed t. alse allegation, could know that Jeffrey Epstein knew that t s a false I ACdit 6 AShIr allegation, because I t s nthe airplane and so S was this underaged g' , c d he knew that. + +15 16 17 18 19 So at e t e that he filed this complaint, he new at it was false, the allegatio that he was making, which allegedly forme thesis of his assertion that I was in ve n a Ponzi scheme. + +20 Okay. + +21 You lost me, but I'm not going -- + +22 A Read it back. I think it makes sense. + +23 Q I'm not going to try to figure that out. + +24 (DB)(you) (have (anyone)(th-Et) can (CeTta f)ratreat) + +GLD what (was) it4E (vs-t-Eiro-g) mind ani in (December (2OC19) at + +1 (the time that the lawsuit was filed about why he + 2 (filed it?) + +3 (A) MR. EPSTEIN testified to that. + +4 (Q) (Other than MR. EPSTEIN,) do you have any + 5 witnesses that are going to testify about the reasons + 6 why MR. EPSTEIN made the decision to file the + 7 lawsuit? + +8 (A) NO. (It's very obvious why he filed the + 9 lawsuit.) + +10 (Q) You have no other witnesses other than + 11 MR. EPSTEIN, correct? + +12 (A) We have attempted to take his attorneys' + 13 depositions and they have all rejected that + 14 opportunity. So he has no witnesses that can testify + 15 as to what was in his mind at that time. + +16 (Q) You are the plaintiff in the counterclaim, + 17 right? + +18 (A) We will see how this unfolds, right? + +19 (Q) Let me just wrap this up, because you have + 20 given me a lot of information to which I think are + 21 simple questions. Do you have a witness that will + 22 testify, other than MR. EPSTEIN, about what was in + 23 his mind in December 2009 about why he brought the + 24 lawsuit? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Direct evidence or + +1(circumstantial) evidence or both?2(THE WITNESS:) (Let) me (think) about (that)3(question.) (About) (why) (he) (brought) (the) (lawsuit.)4(Specifically) (that.)5(MR.) (LINK:) (Can) (you) (read) (back) (the)6(question) (for) (him), (please?)7(I) (won't) (take) (that) (as) (coaching) (at) (all.)8(In) (any) (event,) (well) (done.) (But) (I) (don't) (think)9(you) (heard) (my) (question.)10(Can) (you) (read) (it) (back?)11((Thereupon,) (the) (requested) (portion) (of) (the)12(record) (was) (read) (back) (by) (the) (reporter) (as)13(above) (duly) (recorded.))14(THE WITNESS:) (A) (witness) (other) (than)15(MR.) (Epstein,) (no.)16BY MR. LINK:17Q Thank you.18Why was Bill Berger added to the witness19list last night?20A You will have to ask somebody other than21myself.22Q Do you know what Mr. Berger -- why he's23listed as an expert in this case?24A Again, that's a question for the lawyers.25Q Do you know when Mr. Berger agreed to1 federal action have anything to do with any factor, +2 other than those that you have just described, the +3 potential expiration of the statute of limitations +4 and your desire to take advantage of the provisions +5 of the non-prosecution agreement as a potential +6 alternative to the state court claim? + +7 A That is the only reason that we filed it at +8 that time. + +9 Q Did Scott Rothstein have any role +10 whatsoever in that decision-making process? + +11 A He never had any role in any decision-making +12 process with anything to do with any of these cases, so +13 no. + +14 Q (Did you become aware of the fact that your +15 Epstein-related files at some point in time had been +16 requested by Scott Rothstein?) + +17 (A) Yes. + +18 (Q) How did you become aware of that? + +19 (A) I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +20 Q was there any explanation offered as to why + +21 (Scott Rothstein wanted to see the Epstein-related +22 files?) + +23 (A) That if these cases went to trial, he wanted +24 to try the cases with me. + +25 (Q) He who? + +& " 窟◎U@目动创州澍咖~创自U国囡8目网圈g 冒◎园有5~州-⑨向圈团囤目网国e厨目. + +3 Q And was there anything suspicious about the +4 head partner in the firm telling you that in this +5 high-profile case he wanted to be part of the +6 prosecution team? + +0 <0 0 z。' 洲帏 吕嘴 劭仂仂。°啮什① 5竹。昌耳 写 己鲁I℃"。控尸。 。扣蜘。 昌鲁什 ~。毛, H 毛。吕Q 5什万 什=。 。山仂。嘞8碧#。 什,@ 饰}n什,9仂,① 笔=。 斥°。毛仂仙=吣什z口口g。异一竹. 们仁仂暑a。口仂 吕。=什 什,俾什. 矿狗。 n门< OD尸< 。D仂口。导吕 + +入J + +伞\* HHHm HC " p 渭球獬高专…旨… 劬=的忙 撰 三置 兽。信什 什5一①丰①仂什 骡 。c℃曲竹什吣 + +NNNN阀凸 嘞° 霎9粤g山是导写口 ①H仂。 什万剑什 毛。口什 。口 一口 什J①a。Q。怖 g弓① 什'詈 絮。c 毛。"。 一= 什=山什 H山笔 控吕 <。 〉口吣 n〉仁仂@ 嗡。H g 仂c仂℃①。什 "了伪什 吣。仁烤 aH①仂 毛⑦"⑦ Ug昌 c仂①q 一口 仙口吣笔仙啸、Q#⑦。什H。忖 甘q#①。g絮"旨8口口①28口言导仰口絮口冒啕仰尸山。g&醇 。哧 山易< 酉婴Q + +宫 什c"品①Q 什。 吕①. + +z。. + +1 I was told that he was going to try the + 2 case with me. Period. Not more than, not less than + 3 that. That's just it. Not be the lead, not be the + 4 second, not be the third. + +5 Q Just try the case with you? + +6 A That's what I was told. + +7 Q And that was okay because he was head of + 8 the firm and he owned the files, right? + +9 A Correct. + +10 Q (You were an employee, in your mind, and he + (1) was the lawyer ultimately at the firm responsible for + (2) the three clients, true?) + +(3) (A) (There's seventy lawyers at the firm. They + (4) all work for him. Hundreds of files. He's still the + (5) equity partner of the firm, so they are the firm's + (6) files. They are not - + +17 Q (I understand. You told me earlier. And (I + (8) didn't realize that, that the interest that ( ) + (9) Edwards, PA had in three files, you gave up to + (20) Mr. Rothstein and became a salary employee, + (21) essentially. + +22 A (Gave up to RRA.) + +23 Q Mr. Rothstein's firm, correct? + +24 A Right. We've established this. + +25 Q And so that Mr. Rothstein was the lawyer at + +1 (that) (firm) (as) (the) (--) (one) (of) (two) (equity) (shareholders) + 2 (who) (was) (ultimately) (responsible) (for) (the) (three) (Epstein) + 3 (matters?) + +4 (A) (For) (every) (case) (in) (the) (entire) (firm,) (including) + 5 (those) (--) + +6 Q (Including) (the) (three) (Epstein) (matters?) + +7 A (Every) (case,) (yeah.) + +8 MR. LINK: I have no further questions. + +9 MR. SCAROLA: I have nothing further. + +10 We will read. + +11 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 6:16 + 12 p.m., and that concludes this deposition. + +13 - - - + +14 (The deposition was concluded + 15 at 6:16 p.m.) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..955f9b4bfb1f7597bbbc6b617526d794673e717f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305/EFTA02762305.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1485 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762305.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 41, + "chars": 55122, + "elapsed_seconds": 103.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PART 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 391.8701477050781, + 211.71200000000002 + ], + [ + 391.8701477050781, + 232.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 232.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nDOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF II1S REVI \nEIN'S APPENDIX OF \nBUS MOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 340.724 + ], + [ + 525.4179077148438, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Count III - Abuse of Process - Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 588.87 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 612.36 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 612.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "trd \nAnts* All t7standants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 377.290283203125 + ], + [ + 372.97613525390625, + 377.290283203125 + ], + [ + 372.97613525390625, + 402.31707763671875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 402.31707763671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conspiracy to Commit Fraud, Against All Defendants", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 391.68, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 391.68, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 239.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jury Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.08799999999997, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 290.08799999999997, + 586.4399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 318.33 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 99 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 211 + ], + [ + "Line", + 167 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762305" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c39d3c2365a224493b364bef78a3493fd1497b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES + +AND RE PRETRIAL STIPULATION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO +RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and +being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Than the motion is granted to the + +I fore that wholesale additional discovery will not be +permitted until individual discovery requests may be attached on a +\* + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27 + +day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()\* Matter by matter basis and only if the discovery requests are +impacted by the court's rulings on motions currently + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +pending to be heard on Nov. 29, Dec. 6 & 7, \*\* 17. Former pre- +trial stipulation shall be prepared and filed no later than +~~June~~ December 15, 17. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] \$ + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] \$, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXM BAG Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fbe7d79d590a2eaa6b87836ef8312489f3fcd3e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346/EFTA02762346.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762346.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2885, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 359.745 + ], + [ + 511.02, + 359.745 + ], + [ + 511.02, + 376.285 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 376.285 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 197.64 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762346" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df279e55ec1f586446607d399b5e671fc1adf0ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S /- OPBOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S NOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE i, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey s st )`Epstein") opposes Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Evidence and states: ("Edw Moti n in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible CINTRODUCTION + +A Cos + +seeks to her a criminal case against Epstein or Rothstein and already settled c s of the three actual clients — L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. has repeatedly cently as today, confirmed his plans to start the trial by proving the truth of the cl rought on their behalf. has gone so far as to say that if he can prove Epstein was a child molester, that he has met his burden of proof. This is confounding because those three cases settled in 2010 — over seven years ago! In reality, the only case left to be tried is nothing more than a malicious prosecution claim. The "fabrication" allegations referred to in Motion relate to Rothstein and his undisclosed co-conspirators' efforts to "gin up" the value of the three real 2008 lawsuits for which was the lead attorney, along with some 50 other non-existent cases. + +Any evidence concerning Epstein's physical contact with the three former plaintiffs previously represented — let alone any others — has zero relevance whatsoever to malicious prosecution claim. must prove Epstein's lack of proba le cause at the time he commenced the civil proceeding against and he cannot d 'th highly prejudicial attempts to establish Epstein's culpability in prior criminal or c' ings which have long been terminated. Importantly, Epstein's defense does n im to prove and win the 2009 lawsuit filed by Attorney Critton against Rothste' d . Even a favorable determination regarding ' motives and the p his actions would have no bearing on the issue of Epstein's probable cause Ss, S to i • t ut . Plausible post-filing explanations for IMF behavior in litigating the cases ein while held himself out as a partner at Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adl not ter Epstein's perception of that behavior at the time he filed suit and do not precl a finding that, regardless of any prior liability by Epstein, Epstein had a reasonable sus of M.' wrongdoing, even if that suspicion might eventually be proven wro + +We have en Y r Honor reams of paper. However, if you read nothing other than this, y ave a synopsis of the entire case: + +e, in its most basic form, requires the answer to only one question: whether a reasonably cautious person - when viewing all of the information available in December 2009 along with the logical inferences drawn from that information - would have felt comfortable that was or could have been connected in some way to Rothstein's efforts to fabricate the amount of money that Epstein was willing to pay for the Rothstein pending lawsuits. As + +most recently admitted under oath at his November 10, 2017 deposition, what Epstein suspected was, in fact, true: "It's pretty obvious or clear from this that what Rothstein was doing was using the.. seal legitimate cases against Epstein...to...concoct a story about some other situation, and ask investors to buy into some made up fictitious story." (Tr. 160-61.) In fact, admitted that "[Rothstein] used actual evidence to support a fabricated sto " (Tr. 164.) + +needs no other witnesses because he admitted under oath Epstein's suspicions were correct and Rothstein was concocting and fabricating stp out Epstein to continue to fund the Ponzi scheme. + +# ARGUMENT + +To prove his Counterclaim, should be f d hcther a reasonably cautious person would have felt comfortable filing the civ g against Lacking any admissible evidence about Epstein's state of is trying to create a three-ring circus. Epstein's sexual contact with minors is t re nt to whether Epstein had probable cause to commence a civil proceeding ag ds. We understand Mil desire to obfuscate these issues because as a m icio prosecution plaintiff, he has the "onerous" burden of establishing, by the great i t of the evidence, that the defendant commenced and continued a judicial proc with t probable cause. See v. GCC Beverages Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 Endacott v. Intl Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) must show that probable cause was lacking at all stages of the underlying proceeding."). A civil litigant has probable cause to bring a suit when he has "a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to him, in the validity of the claim." v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (citations omitted). Thus, the facts that are relevant to the question of whether Epstein had probable cause are those that were known to Epstein when he commenced his proceeding against and that bear upon the + +reasonableness of his belief in the validity of his claims. Evidence of Epstein's sexual contact with minors clients or otherwise—is not relevant because it has no bearing on whether Epstein's claims were valid or whether he reasonably believed them to be valid. In other words, it' in fact Epstein had touched over 100 billion underage women before December 2009 how does that testimony or evidence help the jury decide if Epstein reasonably believed that Rothstein and his litigation team were using the three 2008 cases to lure into the Ponzi scheme? + +## I. THE EVIDENCE IS NOT RELEVANT TO MALICE + +Evidence of Epstein's sexual contact with minors also • ant to whether Epstein acted with malice towards . Importantly, if the Sr ) able cause, the existence of malice does not matter. There are two types of mar •, • 843, of which is sufficient for purposes of establishing a malicious prosecution defe bility: legal malice and actual malice. Wilson v. 0 Weal, 118 So. 2d 101, 105 A 1960). Legal malice "requires proof of an intentional act performed without n or excuse." Olson v. M, 961 So. 2d 356, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (cita tied). Actual malice means an intentional wrong, actual malevolence, or a corru t . Wilson, 118 So. 2d at 105. Evidence of Epstein's sexual contact with mind ' clients or otherwise—is not relevant to whether Epstein acted intentional) r out justification or excuse with respect to or whether he commi tentional wrong, showed actual malevolence towards, or carried out a corrupt design wit respect to Evidence of Epstcin's sexual contact with minors is not relevant. + +### II. THE EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE UNDER SECTION 90.404, FLORIDA STATUTES AND MUST BE EXCLUDED UNDER SECTION 90.403, FLORIDA STATUTES + +Section 90.404(2Xa), Florida Statutes plainly states that "[s]imilar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue" but is "inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity." "To determine whether the evidence should be admitted under section 90.404(2Xa nsel must identify the fact or issue that the evidence is being offered to prove. If tha issue is not of consequence to the action, it is not material to the case and the evide be admissible to prove it under section 90.404(2)." C. Ehrhardt, Florida Eviden 4 . (2014 ed.Xciting inter alia, Castro v. State, 547 So. 2d III, 115 (Fla. 1989 intended evidence of an issible under section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes. Additionally, this evidence itioc.precluded under section 90.403, Florida Statutes, because any probative value su tially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, d i ing the jury. "extensive pattern of victimization of minor femal + +"[E]ven if relevant, a t may not permit [] collateral crime evidence to become an impermissible feature of \*al. Collateral crime evidence becomes an impermissible feature of the trial when i riry in the crimes transcend[s] the bounds of relevancy to the charge being tried and the tion `devolves from development of facts pertinent to the main issue of guilt or inn to an assault on the character of the defendant." Durousseau v. State, 55 So. 3d 543, 551 ( la. 2010) (citation omitted). See also C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.9 (2014 ed.) ("This feature limitation is a specific application of the § 90.403 balancing requirement.") (citations omitted). Similar fact evidence may become an impermissible feature of the trial when it "consume[s] more trial time and space than the evidence of the actual crime charged." Sutherland v. State, 849 So. 2d 1107, 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). But similar fact evidence may + +also become an impermissible feature of the trial when the testimony in question is brief but "more detailed" than the testimony concerning the claim at issue and is emphasized at key moments. See Seavey v. State, 8 So. 3d 1175, 1177-78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (brief collateral crimes testimony became feature of the trial because it was more detailed and emphasized in opening and closing arguments). + +plainly intends to make his similar fact evidence concerning i s sexual contact with minors the central feature of the trial. His Motion in Litniae icates that he intends to call fifteen women to testify regarding sexual contact E guaranteeing that the litigation of molestation claims against against tei ill consume more trial and space than the evidence concerning a i({i 'o t) osecution claim. (Motion in Limine Exhibit, D.E. 1051.) If his briefing is\ d ation, is also bound to emphasize the sexual battery claims at key m s ithi e in fr ing the focus on them and not his own malicious prosecution claim. Evidence pst 's sexual contact with minors must therefore be excluded under the "feature" li ee, e.g., Sutherland, 849 So. 2d at 1109. ith them, all but + +Any testimony cone g E in's sexual contact with minors must also be excluded because any remote or probative value is clearly outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confus es, and the risks of misleading the jury. See Fla. Stat. § 90.403. "In weighing the ive value against the unfair prejudice, it is proper for the court to consider the need fdR dence; the tendency of the evidence to suggest an improper basis to the jury for resolving the matter, e.g., an emotional basis; the chain of inference necessary to establish the material fact; and the effectiveness of a limiting instruction." v. Alayon, 162 So. 3d 360, 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citations omitted). In , the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that evidence of the defendant's post-accident bad acts could have inflamed the jury and caused + +them to award damages to the plaintiff out of a desire to punish the defendant. Id. at 366. See also v. State, 19 So. 3d 277, 296 (Fla. 2009) ("Unfair prejudice has been described as an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one. . . . This rule of exclusion is directed at evidence which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.") (citations omitted); Stewart v. Draleaus, 226 So. 3d 990, 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (recognizing the inflammatory effects of evide a party's alcohol use in the context of an action arising from a car accident, and such evidence inadmissible as unduly prejudicial where liability is admitted) (cit. BC v. M, 390 So. 2d 742, 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)); Dana v. State, 126 So. < ) I63, 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (explaining "[t]estimony which evokes sympathy for a vi it p)m e inadmissible on the ground that its probative value is substantially outweighed "clSef 's of unfair prejudice."). + +Any mention of or use of information S S r ase other than this malicious prosecution action is absolutely improper, and is unf ' pre dicial. See, e.g., Long Term Care Found., Inc. v. 778 So. 2d 1100, 110 3 F 5th DCA 2001) (allegations in a different lawsuit against defendant were not re d were highly prejudicial since "under section 90.403, Florida Statutes, any rel re the complaint might have had was outweighed by the unfair prejudice against defe ntr). "It is inconsistent with the notions of fair trial for the state to force a defe resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which the defendant is not on trial." . Ad. Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (finding that "because the prior case was settled, none of the allegations therein were proven"). + +unapologetically plans to exploit irrelevant information from other cases to inflame the jury, appeal to the jury's emotions, and prove Epstein's bad character. (Supplement to Motion in Limine, D.E. 1077 at 10) ("Because Epstein really did molest all those young, + +innocent children, heinous crimes that he has callously compared to `stealing a bagel."). "If the introduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a confusion in the minds of the jurors in excess of the legitimate probative effect of such evidence, if it tends to obscure rather than illuminate the true issue before the jury then such evidence should be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing Perper v. Edell 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2 robative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prej fusion of the issues and misleading of the jury, as the evidence and instruction cocece n atus as an illegal alien improperly changed the focus of the jury's attention). + +The evidence intends to introduce co rein pstein's sexual contact with minors should be excluded pursuant to section 90.4 ls, • Statutes + +Jeffrey Epstein respectfully req his Court enter an Order denying J. ME Motion in Limine Ad of Admissible Evidence and excludes evidence of Epstein's sexual contact with + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 22, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] A + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (F Primary: Scott®1i kl w.com Primary: Kara aw.com Primary: A la inkrocklaw.com Second Tin linkrocklaw.com Sewn anya®Iinkrocklaw.com 1 Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +C 'S \*) + +## — SERVICE LIST + +Counsel for PlaintW7Counter-Defendant rey Epstein + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, S la, Balhltart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm B Boulevard West Palm B ch, L 33409 mepOsearcvlaw.com jsx@a&aw.coin scarolatea searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintill + +J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel or J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc®nuriklaw.com + +Jack A. Goldberger 250 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com smahonev®attwpa.com Co-Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +,1OAlk + +CO + +...agia. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fae679f41e8c7744071e47aed071cd7c3784e601 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349/EFTA02762349.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,537 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762349.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 15526, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.5, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S /- OPBOSITION TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S NOTION IN LIMINE \nADDRESSING SCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE i,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 477.41790771484375, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 477.41790771484375, + 382.60302734375 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 382.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 485.4489999999999 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 485.4489999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 307.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 307.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. THE EVIDENCE IS NOT RELEVANT TO MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 388.5097961425781, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 388.5097961425781, + 279.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 279.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE UNDER SECTION 90.404, FLORIDA \nSTATUTES AND MUST BE EXCLUDED UNDER SECTION 90.403, FLORIDA \nSTATUTES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.6033325195312, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.6033325195312, + 114.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 114.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2014 SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.86000061035156, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 484.863037109375 + ], + [ + 231.86000061035156, + 484.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762349" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83a6c01a44f9d9f63c208ad4881dfc094cfa82ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +J. , individually, + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN'S REOUEST FOR JUDICI + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstei id"), pursuant to sections 90.202 and 90.203, Florida Statutes, requests that this Co icial notice of the court files and the court documents included in Epstein's App of ments in Support of his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed on Nove , 7, (D.E. 1078-1085) as follows: + +- I. Jane Doe v. Je E Lein; United States District Court, Southern District of Florida.Casc No. 9:08-cv-80893-ICAM + - a. ?S 4/9/ ill , Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring O e Doe's Attorneys from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) [App. 2] 4/17/09, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) [App. 3] +- 2. Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein; United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA, + - a. 6/19/09, Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of + +D.E. references relate to the cases in which the documents were filed. + +Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) [App. 5] + +- b. 11/5/09, Order (D.E. 400) [App. 6] +- 3. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein; United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM + - a. 7/27/09, Complaint (D.E. 1) [App. 8] + - b. Court Docket [App. 9] +- 4. E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein; 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach ase No. 50- 2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB + - a. 8/10/09, Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon La C (D., . 143) [App. 11] +- 5. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein; 15th Judicial Circuit 2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB each County Case No. 50 + - a. Epstein's Motion for Protecti rXegarding Depositions of Visoski and David Hart R . 159) [App. 12] +- 6. United States of America v. W. othstein (Forfeiture Action); United States District Court, Southern IPitict o orida, Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ + - a. 11/9/09, Ve aint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 1) [App. 15] + - b. 11/23/09kAmep8ed Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (D.E. 14) [A p. 18 +- 7. Razorback uhding, LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Ces cil lo. 009CA062943AXXXCE + 1) +- 8. United States v. Rothstein; United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-J1C 11/20/09, Complaint (D.E. 3) [App. 17J 11/25/09, Amended Complaint (D.E. 12) [App. 21] + - a. 12/1/09, Information (D.E. I) [App. 22] + +To streamline the trial of this matter and the hearing on Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine and to reduce costs, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court take judicial notice of these court records. Under section 90.202(6), Florida Statutes, a court may take judicial notice of records of any court of this state or of any court of record of the United States or o any state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. A court, however, shall take judici e of such matters when (1) proper notice is given to the adverse party, and (2) the 'shed with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice of the ma Evidence Code § 90.203. + +Epstein has provided notice to Defendant/Counter t c'n d he has provided the Court with sufficient information herein and in his Appc i tS1St " cuments in Support of his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, to take judicial ( S S' fr ese court records. Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests judicial notice of cou records identified above and included in his Appendix. + +O + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 22, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20280152f8c40a2235ee8cbe7fbdda66817ea313 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359/EFTA02762359.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762359.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 8432, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.15, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 114.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 114.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN'S \nREOUEST FOR JUDICI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 348.863037109375 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 348.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 456.8399999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762359" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fc537df32419a78f191eae1d9b19d33f8148466 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.md @@ -0,0 +1,1643 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +#### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTc ISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LI + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. . by a through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Oppositions to Jeffrey Est s Revvised Omnibus Motion in Limine, and as grounds therefor states as follows:,S ) + +#### Summary + +Jeffrey Epstein's `Epstein Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine makes a desperate, 32 page attempt to ch e the cts of this case in order to alter ea) burden of proof. Ep cl r purpose is to avoid the admission of evidence that he lacked probable cause t tl HL Underlying claims against . Prior to addressing and refuting Epstein's motion in tail, it is important that burden in proving his malicious prosecution claim is accurately defined. + +believe that has the burden to prove that there was no reasonable basis for Epstein to manufactured and fabricated the claims was pursuing on behalf of + +clients against Epstein and that purpose in creating false claims was to knowingly aid in the perpetration of a massive Ponzi scheme. Since Epstein has blocked relevant discovery through 5th Amendment privilege assertions into what he knew at the time he syed and since he has expressly chosen not to assert an advice of counsel thereby preserving his attorney-client privilege, must prove the cause element through circumstantial evidence. The most compellin defense the probable tial evidence as to what Epstein knew are the facts relating to what Epstein , pstem could not reasonably believe "manufactured"/"ginned up"/ "crafted" c ed" claims against Epstein if Epstein did what Mr. alleged he did. A 'It ,'Plaintiff burden of proof is properly described as follo?c , contends that the + +- I. Plaintiff starts by p of L.M., E.W. and Jane D procedures he follow complete absence o scheme. g th truth of the claims he brought on behalf priety of the discovery he pursued and the prosecution of those claims as well as the f any knowledge of or participation in the Ponzi purpose he P ntiff will prove the leaders!. had in +- 2. Then, to estab motive to target for extortionist the jo\* t osecution effort of the multiple civil claims ing prosecuted against E their attendant punitive damage exposure as well as the Crime Rights Act case challen it E stein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, as spearheaded by and exposes Epstein to lengthy ration for his extensive history of child molestations. +- 3. Having proven the truth of Epstein's serial child molestation, the Plaintiff meets his initial burden of establishing the absence ti aofprobable cause. Proof of ir,n's motive to file false claims against (to extort Mr. into abandoning or compromising e interests o is clients) while not necessary to establishing a prima facia case corroborates the absence of probable cause, the existence of malice, and the foundation for an award of punitive damages. + +1. 4. The burden then shifts to Epstein. Epstein must attempt to establish either that the claims he brought against Brad [REDACTED] were true or must establish that even though his claims were not true he, nevertheless, had a reasonable basis to believe the claims against [REDACTED] were true- that is, that Epstein reasonably believed the claims [REDACTED] was pursuing on behalf of LM, EW and Jane Doe against him were fabricated AND reasonably believed that [REDACTED] Edwards was prosecuting these fabricated claims as a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. He must prove both to escape liability, but obviously, he must do so without relying on evidence that he has withheld through his earlier privilege assertions. In addition, Epstein faces the further obstacles of: + 1. i. His complete failure to defend against [REDACTED] Motion for Summary Judgment; + 2. ii. The res judicata effect of his voluntary dismissal of the claims against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + 3. iii. The absolute bar of the litigation privilege to support any damage claim arising out of Edwards' litigation conduct in the child molestation cases; + 4. iv. The fact that if the molestation cases were not fabricated, Epstein could not have been damaged by a fraud perpetrated without his knowledge against third parties with whom he never had any relationship; + 5. v. His criminal guilty pleas; and + 6. vi. His payment of \$5.5 million in civil settlements on [REDACTED] Edwards's three cases alone, which are the cases Epstein claims were fabricated. + +In the context of this proper understanding of [REDACTED] burden of proof order, Plaintiff [REDACTED] submits the following response to Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +**A. Epstein Has Repeatedly Made Clear That He Alleged That [REDACTED] Cases Were "Manufactured" / "Ginned Up" / "Crafted" / "Fabricated"** + +The foundation upon which Defendant Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine is built begins with the following claims: + +1. 1. "This case is not, and has never been, about whether or not the claims filed in 2008 against Epstein by [REDACTED] clients are true." Mot. in Limine at p. 2. + +2. Epstein never alleged "that did anything improper in regard to the conduct of this limitation until after joined RRA. Id. (emphasis in original). + +These assertions are demonstrably false and are simply another attempt ` b Epstein to retroactively change the allegations in his December 7, 2009 Initial Complaint sworn testimony that Epstein gave in his March 17, 2010 deposition. es the record citations contained in his Supplement to Motion in Limine Add ing pe of Admissible Evidence (a copy of which is attached as an Appendix to this or purposes of convenient reference), which lays out in detail that the overridin V eof Epstein's claims against was that had "manufactured" 1 4h behalf of his clients, which had "minimal to no value" and were instead g by for the "sole purpose" of knowingly funding Rothstein's Ponzi S S e, e.g..M 1 Supp. Mot. in Limine at p. 2. To now claim that this case "is n ii... t; h never been, about whether or not" a clients' claims were true is therefore be cl b ) the allegations contained in Epstein's Initial Complaint. + +Moreover, if Epst not alleged that the cases being pursued against him by were fabricated, ein would have no claim against based only upon Epstein's allegation Qf ' participation in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme for at least two reasons. First, ion conduct is absolutely privileged under Florida law. See, e.g., Echevarria, kfcCalla, Raymer, & Frappier v. M, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Second, Epstein was not a victim of the Ponzi scheme and therefore he suffered no legally cognizable damage as a result of Rothstein's misconduct. Epstein therefore had to, and in fact did, allege that the lawsuits being pursued by were fabricated. Epstein even sued one of his victims, L.M., and in the Initial + +Complaint he explicitly stated that the sexual contact he engaged in with L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe was "knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual." Initial Complaint at I 49. + +Furthermore, although Epstein now alleges that his claims only relate to wo performed by while an attorney at RRA beginning in April 2009, that is simply wards filed the victims' cases in 2008, before he joined RRA. pled fo \$50,000,000 when he filed the initial lawsuits in 2008, before he j began serving discovery related to the \$15 million bond issuance ory h 23, 2009, before he joined RRA.' Yet all of these litigation actions by a w h ed his time at RRA, are cited by Epstein as "evidence" that was an activ i t in the Ponzi scheme that Rothstein began in 2005 (when was still at omey's Office). Thus, although Epstein would like to replead his allegations to wards' six (6) month tenure at RRA, that has never been what this case is abou + +## B. Epstein Misunderstant thjJDifference Between Direct and Circumstantial Evidence + +Epstein's R 'sod djnnibus Motion in Limine also builds its foundation on the following demonstrably < as 'on, references to which are replete throughout the motion: + +to Epstein, the third support on which he rests his defense is that no evidence, either direct or circumstantial, regarding whether Epstein had + +attached hereto as Exhibit '1'. As the Court will recall, Epstein mak.nucigMubsequent bond motion filed in I A copy of the First Request for Admissions served on Epstein by in the Jane Doe federal case is July as evidence that was "pumping" his clients' "manufactured" claims to further the Rothstein was takiniacovery on the bond issue in March on behalf of Ponzi scheme. Yet as this March 2 009 pleading shows, of 2009, before he started at RRA. The pleading is clearly and Associates, LLC. + +"probable cause" to file the underlying claims in this action, or whether he acted with "malice."See, e.g., Mot. in Limine at p. 1 ("In recent deposition testimony, 1M admitted that he has no evidence of Epstein's intent ...'). + +Epstein is correct that apart from Epstein's obvious knowledge of o riminal conduct, noes not have direct evidence as to what was in Epste t the time he filed this malicious lawsuit (because Epstein has repeatedly hidden b attorney-client privileges). However, Amendment and has, and inteuVut forward, an abundance of circumstantial evidence as to both probable cause and m e , .g., Dep. Tr. at pages 272-76. Specifically, that Epstein committed all t 4 and therefore Epstein could not have had Zrause to initiate this lawsuit, and in fact Epstein's motive was to instead extorts 7 And it is that very circumstantial evidence that Epstein's Revised Omnibus Moti e improperly asks this Court to exclude. rimes that he was being accused of, + +## C. Epstein's Remaining g Blocks Crumble Under the Weight of the Law and the Uncontested ecord acts + +After chan g the derlying facts to suit his desired narrative and making the obviously incorrect ass th Epstei next 30-odd pages attempting to keep out any and all circumstantial evidence that Edwar s is clearly entitled to introduce to meet his burden of proof. Specifically, Epstein continues building his house on the following blocks: has "no evidence" to prove either probable cause or malice, + +3. The discovery pursued by was not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence and therefore, supports the conclusion that was a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. + +4. Evidence of other claims against Epstein and the criminal charges against him are irrelevant to any pending issue. + +5. Exhibits listed by are inadmissible hearsay. + +had no legiti e and therefore supports the conclusion that was a knowing t in the Ponzi scheme. 6. The federal lawsuit filed by + +7. cannot rely on any adverse inference n Epstein's 5'h Amendment assertions. + +Every one of those blocks crumbles under of any reasonable application of the law to the uncontested record evidence. + +- i. The discovery pursued adlejTEdwards was reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence n absence of a direct link to the conduct alleged by three an4flt4 i11 S ents. + +Setting aside the fact Itein suffered no cognizable legal damage as a result of the discovery pursued by Ed due to the litigation privilege), all discovery pursued by on beh his clients was appropriate given: (1) the pending Punitive Damage claim against A.7. Ep t Florida Statutes § 90.404(2)(a), which permits similar fact evidence of other wrongs, acts to be introduced into evidence to prove a material fact at issue (such as motive); (3) the 18 USC 2255 Federal claims requiring a federal interstate nexus; and (4) Federal Rule of Evidence 415, which makes evidence of prior sexual molestations admissible. + +Defendant Epstein conveniently ignores all four factors listed above. As an example, on page 4 of his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, Epstein claims that the following questions posed to Epstein at his 2009 deposition were "outrageous and irrelevant": + +Q (by a "Mr. Epstein, did you ever care about any of the feels o e minor girls that you were engaging in sex with?" + +Q (by ': "Isn't it true that at the time you were inserti gers into the vagina of these little kids, all you cared about w .wn sexual gratification?" + +These questions are clearly relevant to the victims' punitivo,damage claims. Additionally, as was actively seeking to overturn Eps and was a lead attorney quarterbacking the civil lawsuits being prosecut e\ a Epstein, evidence and testimony related to Epstein's potential criminal and civiTli bi ity as a result of his actions is clearly relevant to establish his motive in filj cause and malice). al Complaint (which goes to both probable + +#### ii The Exhi that pstein Challenges are Not Hearsay When They Are Not Being Offered to the Truth of the Matters Asserted. + +Exhibits law enforcement investigative reports, witness statements, depositions in other casesta raft flight logs, are not inadmissible hearsay2 because they are not offered to + +a Somewhat ironically, Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine attempts to demonstrate Epstein's probable cause to initiate this lawsuit by relying on a variety of media articles and unswom pleadings, all of which are inadmissible hearsay unless offered for the sole purpose of proving a basis for Epstein's state of mind - a reasonable belief of i guilt even if he was actually innocent. Unfortunately for Epstein, no such conclusion can be drawn from the sources he cites, because none of the sources purportedly relied upon . b E stein name IFFI as a coconspirator in the Ponzi scheme that Rothstein ran from 2005 to 2009. And was only at or six (6) months in 2009, after the Ponzi scheme had been running for years. (at least, actor ing to the hearsay Epstein purports to have relied upon in filing this claim). Tellingly, Epstein did not name Rosenfeldt or Adler, the other named partners at RRA, or former Circuit Court Judge William Berger, active RRA co-counsel in the Epstein cases who is actually mentioned in one of the articles, as defendants in t is ma icious lawsuit. Only M, the attorney who was + +prove the truth of the matters asserted. Rather they are evidence of what relied on to form the reasonable basis for his pursuit of discovery calculated to lead to admissible evidence. That is, these exhibits establish the foundation for state of mind in !eying, for example, that specific individuals were passengers on Epstein's private pl her with minors who were transported interstate for purposes of sexual abuse and n. Certainly, Epstein cannot claim that "sought inflammatory discov as not relevant to clients' allegations against Epstein," Mot. in Limin cta , and then object to the very exhibits that establish why the discovery was being p add Exhibit related to Epstein's criminal conviction an d sex offender status is admissible to establish Epstein's motive to file this malici ts I t against to avoid imprisonment by intimidating any other victims from 4c)....e ng frifward. e first place. Moreover, the + +- iii. The 234-page fede ' filed by hada well -justified purpose pursuant to the rms a conditions o Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and the timing of its n as dictated by an expiring statute of limitation. + +Epstein makes m he fact that filed a second, federal lawsuit on behalf of L.M. in the su 2009. See, e.g., Mot. in Limine at p. 2 (referring to the L.M.'s federal action as a "dupl it"). According to Epstein, this lawsuit was filed for the "sole purpose" of furthenn t e onzi scheme. As explained in painstaking detail in his November 10, 2017 deposition, however, the real purpose behind the L.M. federal lawsuit was two-fold: (1) to take advantage of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, which prevented Epstein from contesting liability for any civil action brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255, and (2) to prevent the statute of + +actively pursuing multi-million dollar civil actions and the federal action to invalidate the NPA was targeted by Epstein. + +limitations from running on L.M.'s claims.3 And as testified, the state and federal L.M. lawsuits sought entirely different relief. + +Specifically, filed the 2009 federal action because Epstein had co mined 156 separate acts of sexual assault against L.M. while she was still a minor. It was ' position that, under Epstein's NPA, L.M. was entitled to compensation for each se ult. legal theory was that the NPA could not possibly only require Epst a statutory penalty for the first sexual assault, and then allow Epstein to commit t 155 sexual assaults for free. Obviously, will be able to establish to the mem ry that Epstein in fact sexually assaulted L.M. 156 times, so Epstein could not based his probable cause on this lawsuit. But given that Epstein has challeng y of this lawsuit and contended that it was filed for the "sole purpose" of pumpin nzi heme, must be permitted to establish that he had a well-justified purpo g this relief: to avoid the statute of limitations and to take advantage of Epstein's N details of which Epstein was fully aware of when he filed the malicious Initial Com gainst + +Finally, 'n's argument that the scrivener's error regarding the filing of the action under "Es t, red herring because the case was quickly consolidated with the other federal actions rn against Epstein, and he actively defended the case without being formally served. That consolidation also undermines Epstein's Assertion that he was damaged by the need to incur attorney's fees in responding to federal action, because regardless of the filing of the + +3 A copy of the relevant portions of deposition transcript is attached hereto as Exhibit '2'. [page 317-324]. + +federal claim on behalf of L.M., the discovery was being pursued simultaneously by other attorneys with other cases, the legitimacy of which has never been and could not be cancelled. + +iv. is Entitled to an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction on stein's 9 Amendment Assertions. + +Every authority relied upon by Epstein to challenge the ability to draw erse inferences from Epstein's assertions of his Fifth Amendment right to remain sil ssly qualifies the limitation advanced by Epstein — it applies only when the assertion o e ifth Amendment right is the stele basis supporting the inference.Wor example, E , and agrees, that the Fourth District Court of Appeal permits an adv e instruction when a defendant "refuse[s] to testify in response to probative evi end against them ..." See Mot. in Limine at p. 17 (citing Fraser v. Sec. & kw. Co , 5 So. 2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). An appropriate jury instruction addressi fifth amendment assertions in t op ion on drawing adverse inferences from Epstein's + +Here, there is ab ut dant oivan overwhelming evidence to support the inferences sought to be drawn. Three obv\* ex pies should suffice: Epstein pled guilty to two felonies related to the sexual mole oD children and voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal gove en confessing his serial molestation. In addition, when called upon to support his claims aga t in response to Motion for Summary Judgment, he + +also cites to the Coquina Investments v. Rothstein case for the incorrect proposition that use Epstein's Sth Amendment assertion as circumstantial evidence related to probable cause and malice. ee ot. in Limine at p. 20. Yet Coquina concerned whether an adverse inference could be drawn against TD Bank when it was the bank's employee, Mr. Spinosa, asserted the 56 Amendment privilege. The Court in that case held that Spinosa's Sn' Amendment assertions were not a proper basis for finding defendant TD Bank liable. Here, however, Epstein is both the asserter of the privilege and the defendant against whom the adverse inference is sought to be applied. + +completely failed to produce any evidence to support his claims and dismissed all of his false and malicious assertions. Finally, after full public disclosure of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and after his malicious attempt to extort [REDACTED] failed, Epstein paid \$5.5 million to settle the three cases he alleged that [REDACTED] had fabricated and were worthless. + +**Conclusion** + +For the foregoing reasons, every element of Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine + +Page 14 of 14 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +![](_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg) + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAMOHNSON + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +## PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO C 0 EkDANT + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, by and through her undersigned counsel, and files this her First Request for Admissions to the Defendant; JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests said Defendant admit or deny the following facts ?,41Sn4ccordance , with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: + +#### DEFINITIONS + +The term "you" meanslprefers to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +# O ADMISSIONS + +- 1. Y'o'ur net worth is greater than \$10 million. +- 2. Your net worth is greater than \$50 million. +- 3. Your net worth is greater than \$100 million. +- 4. Your net worth is greater than \$500 million. + +![](_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg) + +5. Your net worth is greater than \$1 billion. + +6. Since being incarcerated you have, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons), conveyed money or assets in an attempt to insulate or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits filed against you. + +7. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in the Caribbean. + +8. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property inn foreign countries. + +9. In the last 2 years you have transferred assets and/or mon financial instruments to countries outside the United States. + +10. You have provided financial support to the modeli -icy MC2. + +11. You committed sexual assault against Plainti + +12. You committed battery against Plainti + +13. You digitally penetrated Plaintiff(w enStyr s as a minor. + +14. You offered Plaintiff more contingent upon her having sex with you or giving you oral sex. + +15. You intended to tiff when you committed these sexual acts against her. + +16. You knew Pla as under the age of 16 when you sexually touched and fondled her. ?S' + +17. O int d to hire investigators to intimidate and harass Plaintiff during this c n litigation. + +18. You were engaged in the act of trafficking minors across state or country borders for the purposes of sex or prostitution between 2000 and the present. + +19. You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitute and remaining in prostitution. + +- 20. You are guilty of the following offenses against Jane Doe: + - A. Procuring a minor for the purpose of prostitution as defined in F.S. 796.03 + - B. Battery as defined by Florida Statutes + - C. Sexual Battery +- 21. You are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts. +- 22. You are making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgmeawhattight be entered against you in this or similar cases. +- 23. You currently have the ability to post a bond of \$15 mill\* to satiSfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SEAIVP < C + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true an opy of the above and foregoing has I been provided via United States mail to the f4t1 wing addressees, this day of March, 2009. + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike. Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & C rtyin, LLP 515 North Flagler Driv Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 rcritaiThciclaw.iorn mpikerabc1clawscom + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 jagescabellsouth.net + +Michael R. Tein, Esquire +██████ Tein, P.L. +3059 Grand Avenue +Suite 340 +Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 +[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com) + +Respectfully Submitted, + +THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD ██████ & +ASSOCIATES, LLC + +By: + +![]()Brad ██████, Esquire +Attorney for Plaintiff +Florida Bar No. 542075 +2028 ██████ Street +Suite 202 +Hollywood, Florida 33020 +Telephone: 954-414-8033 +Facsimile: 954-924-1530 +E-Mail: [be@bradedwardslaw.com](mailto:be@bradedwardslaw.com) + +Paul G. Cassell +Attorney for Plaintiff +Pro Hac Vice +332 S. 1400 E. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Telephone: 801-585-5202 +Facsimile: 801-585-6833 +E-Mail: [cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +I; + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; S individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLgley + +VIDEO";es5S4 ITION + +Ag979.11Y + +C e)n Taken on Behalf of Plaintiff + +'t ta + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reportinilrvice, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ;2: (561) 471-2995 + +non-prosecution agreement with the federal government, • there was a provision within that agreement that Said 3 that if one of his oscura brought a case against him I exclusively under 18 USC 2255, then only under tnat 5 circumstance of bringing that case exclusively under a that count would Jeffrey Epste:n not contest liability • and agree to a minimum statutory damage amount Of • 5150,000. He later contested and said that an earlier application of the statute applied and It should only ;') be \$50.000. + +But nOnethele\$S, that was the general principle. That Statute did not allow for punitive damages. AM as f just explained, we assessed the :4 punitive damages as being extraordinary in cm case. + +So that's rite answer to that Question in .6 tarn, of the difference of the damages that we were Claiming in the state action, which contained a to 5 2i 22 claim for punitive damages and proceeded under common law theories of battery or intentional affliction, emotional distress. Those kinds of things in the federal claim was co proceed under 16 USC 2255. + +23 24 25 What happened in the summer of 2009 was that it was realized -- like I said, not by me -- it was initiallyrealized by Mr. Cassell. but : agreed. + +32 22 24 25 A Well. the statute of limitations in any sense s 5 only have so long from the time that the tort or the crime la °smutted to bring a claim, Otivarwl\$0 it's waived forever. So whet we did rot want to do is fail to bring the claim under 2255 and that claim expire at her 21st birthday, and it ultimately be a more beneficial claim to have brought and us not have the ability to bring it any more. Because it was also around that same time that we began to believe that -- there was an argument -- and perhaps the right atument -- the argument that 1 still believe + +that L.M.'s case was proceeding only in a and chat we had not taken advantage a provision in the non-prosecution a would allow for statutory dams s lhde 2255, and that L.M.'s birthday -- 21 believe -- was coming up in Augu that tho statute of limitations run -- or begin to run at that birthday for bra trig he 2255 claims. + +Q Exp n to the es and gentlemen of the jury, if wow lease, what the statute of hole app ed under the circumstance meant. Why' IL:cameo: the statute of 1 'air + +1 a 0 10 A If that determination was made in federal court, she would not have been shielded in state court, but we could have dismissed the state court claim and only proceeded under the federal case. The: we would be presenting a case in front of the jury were all of the -- lot's call it dirt that Jeffrey Epstein had dug up about L.M. would not be -- would not all have to cone into evidence, and we could save her sate of the problems that we assessed as being problems with her case. + +i2 li :4 Q You spoke about the statute of limitatio,., and L.M. turning 21. What is the statute of limitations that applies in a federal 18 1.M 2255 Cairn? + +15 16 it 19 14 20 21 A From recollection, there were two readings Of the statute. I haven't seen the statute in a long time -- at least in a while -- but it's -- it uses sons language that it's three years from the date that the disability no longer exists, which we interpret as her being a minor. So I think it's three years from the time that she's no longer a manor. + +22 21 24 So at the tuns she turned 21. there was an argument that her 2255 claims, if we Chose to proceed under them, would have expired. + +25 Q Did the timing of the filing of i + +to this day prObably we would win on, but it never got tested -- was that while Jaffrey Epstein. under 2255, would have to agree -- if you exclusively sum a him under that -- would have to agree to met:: to i liability and to statutory minimum damages of 2 150.000. It was his position that that would be the mxinum regardless of the number of tines that he t molested that particular person. 5 In L.M.'s circumstance. she had been 10 Molested by him for years and dozens and dozens and it dozens of tines. I don't know how man tires. :: maybe 100 times while a minor. So we tatted to IN think, you know what, if you set of these 14 cases for \$150,000, it's g ndetv uing this 15 case. If he has to admi lity and you can la nult:ply 150.000 tuna- e of offenses that 15 he committed, it tim from having to is endure catenate discov y and intimidation that :9 they -- especial -- was having CO endure. 20 And if hat argument, then that'S definite:), 5, thepe try this case, especially for L.X. that difference? Why would L.N. be rote abase co which she was subjected in the proceeding :f the doter:Wien= was made proceed in federal court under USG 2255? + +1 federal action have anything to do with any factor, + 2 other than those that you have just described, the + 3 potential expiration of the statute of limitations + 4 and your desire to take advantage of the provisions + 5 of the non-prosecution agreement as a potential + 6 alternative to the state court claim? + +7 A That is the only reason that we filed it at + 8 that time. + +9 Q Did Scott Rothstein have any role + 10 whatsoever in that decision-making process? + +11 A He never had any role in any decision-making + 12 process with anything to do with any of these cases, so + 13 no. + +14 Q Did you become aware of the fact that your + 15 Epstein-related files at some point in time had been + 16 requested by Scott Rothstein? + +17 A Yes. + +18 Q How did you become aware of that? + +19 A I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +20 Q Was there any explanation offered as to why + 21 Scott Rothstein wanted to see the Epstein-related + 22 files? + +23 A That if these cases went to trial, he wanted + 24 to try the cases with me. + +25 Q He who? + +1 A He, Scott Rothstein, wanted to try the case + 2 with me. That's the explanation that I was given. + +3 Q And was there anything suspicious about the + 4 head partner in the firm telling you that in this + 5 high-profile case he wanted to be part of the + 6 prosecution team? + +7 A No. If my associate brought in a + 8 high-profile case right now, I would be the one to try + 9 the case, despite the fact that she may be the only one + 10 who knows anything about it. So there's nothing + 11 suspicious about that. + +12 Q Files got returned to you? + +13 A Yes, files did get returned to me. + +14 Q And -- was there anything about the request + 15 for review of the files on the basis that Scott + 16 Rothstein was considering participating in the + 17 prosecution of those claims that aroused any + 18 suspicion on your part? + +19 A No. + +20 Q Was there anything else that went on in the + 21 short period of time that you were in that law firm + 22 that gave any cause for you to suspect that your + 23 files were being used in any way, directly or + 24 indirectly, in connection with any illegal activity + 25 of any kind? + +1 A No. I was just a lawyer just working my case + 2 and trying to prove my case. That's it. I wasn't + 3 concerned with whatever other signals or signs there + 4 were. But there weren't any. The most suspicious + 5 thing was, there were police officers walking the + 6 hallway. But police officers in the building didn't + 7 give me that type of suspicion. It was an unnecessary + 8 degree of security over the law firm, at best. But + 9 with these files or any of the files, no suspicion + 10 whatsoever. + +11 Q Who were your coworkers in that law firm? + 12 Who were the other lawyers that you were working + 13 with? + +14 A Just generally who was in the law firm? + +15 Q Yeah. Give us a general description of the + 16 quality of the people that were working for + 17 Rothstein, [REDACTED] filed a Adler during the period of + 18 time that you became associated with the firm. + +19 A Well, while I was at the firm, I worked with + 20 Bill Berger, who had just come off the bench. He was a + 21 judge. + +22 Q There's been a number of references to Bill + 23 Berger having just come off the bench. Was Judge + 24 Berger a respected member of the judiciary in Palm + 25 Beach County? + +1 A Very much so, and that's why I welcomed him + 2 to help with the file. + +3 Q Did he leave under any circumstances that + 4 gave rise to any suspicion whatsoever? + +5 MR. LINK: Object to the form. + +6 THE WITNESS: Not at all. + +7 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +8 Q Who were the other people that you were + 9 working with? + +10 A Like I said, I conducted -- I ran the files. + 11 But other people -- + +12 Q When I say working with, I'm not talking + 13 about limiting that question to people who worked on + 14 the Epstein files. Who were the other folks that + 15 were a part of this firm? + +16 A Steve Jaffe, Gary [REDACTED], Matt Weissing. + 17 Gary's [REDACTED] father was an appellate judge. In + 18 fact, I think he was still on the bench then when we + 19 were working there together. Gary is a senator now. + 20 Matt Weissing, who became my partner. Steve Jaffe, + 21 same. Mark Fistos, same. + +22 These are high-quality people. Good + 23 lawyers. The people that I associated with there, + 24 good lawyers, good people, not doing anything bad. + 25 They're just lawyers who are good lawyers. That's + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. + +v. + +.1SC -7 ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE SUPPORT OF HIS REVISED 0 APPENDIX IN OTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey s et pstein") files this Appendix in support of his revised Omnibus Motion in Limine ein vlfll supplement this Appendix to attach the actual his revised Motion: documents and testimony cited h + +Cos + +#### I. DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S COMPLAINT + +## A. Cit N verage: November 3-6, 2009 + +On Nov m 3, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "Scott Rothste s ent deals seemed too good to be true." Sally Kestin, Jon Burstein & Brittany Wallin Y tt Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 3, 2009.1 The Sun-Sentinel reported that "Rothstein attracted investors by promising huge returns and selling settlements he said he'd reached in sex discrimination and whistle-blower cases, + +Available at http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-I I -03/news/sfl-rothstein-investment-plan-I I sbnov03\_1\_scott-rothstein-stuart-rosenfeldt-firm. + +documents he gave prospective clients show." Id. The Sun-Sentinel quoted Alan Sakowitz, "a Miami lawyer and developer() [who] told the Sun Sentinel he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor three times, but quickly became suspicious. 'I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake settlements,' Sakowitz said." Id. According to the Sun-Sentinel, a "spokesman for Ban n Income Fund, an investment group that collected \$65 million and invested an undiscl amo t with Rothstein, said it contacted federal prosecutors in recent days with conc `suspicious activity?" Id. The Sun-Sentinel interviewed Rosenfeldt, who told th aper that "several of [his] co-workers may have done work for [Rothstein's] invest. siness without realizing its scope or nature." Id. The Sun-Sentinel reported that i ed "Rothstein's confidential offerings," which "describe[d] extremely high largely unregulated investment opportunities," one of which "offered invest nt return in three months, far more than the troubled and bond markets." akot told the Sun-Sentinel that "Rothstein boasted of having sophisticated eavesdrop ent and that former cops would sift through potential defendants' garbage," that "R hste claimed to have a 'huge volume of cases, an employer sleeping with the secreta eptionist,'" and that Rothstein claimed he "offered his clients a way to avoid wa g for t e [settlement] money by giving them a lesser amount, but in a lump sum up fro d. The Sun-Sentinel said that, according to Rothstein's offering documents, RRA out sexual discrimination and whistle-blower cases and used former cops to dig up incrimina ng evidence," "the firm urged the targets of the claims to pay a settlement without a public lawsuit," "'[t]hese types of cases are highly confidential and thus, quite lucrative, because the defendants place a high premium on keeping the details of the case confidential,' and investors + +"would receive the full settlement amount in three to 12 months, with a guaranteed minimum 20 percent return[.]" + +On November 6, 2009, the New Times Broward-Palm Beach printed an article entitled "Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy." Bob Norman, Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy, New Times Broward-Palm Beach, Nov. 6, 2009. dia2k ccording il to the New Times, "[o]ne way" that Rothstein enticed investors "was by tri [th ] into believing that his firm was representing numerous underaged girls who ha i alm Beach billionaire and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein." Id. T "Rothstein claimed that he had flight logs showing that Epstei including former President Bill Clinton, on his private Rothstein "told investors that Epstein, Clinton, a choice but to settle these cases and that it was e that investors "then ponied up million settlements to the victims, and was "no indication that the fo other celebrity names ba Imes reported that xtremely prominent people, e of the plaintiffs" and that ebrities involved basically had no treasure-trove." Id. The New Times said 'nye in the settlements, pay out a portion of those " but Rothstein was "fabricating the story" and there ident, who was at one time a real friend of Epstein's, and ut by Rothstein were involved in any way." Id. + +The New es gtZted "Fort Lauderdale attorney Bill Scherer, who [wa]s representing multiple Rot investors.... 'He used the [Epstein case] as a showpiece, as bait,' said Scherer. 'Tha he raised all the money. He would use legitimate cases as bait for luring investors into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there.'" Id. The New Times mentioned "one legitimate case involving Epstein and + +2 Available at http://vAvw.browardpalmbeach.com/news/scott-rothstein-the-jeffrey-epstein-andbill-clinton-ploy-6471700. + +an underaged girl" involving RRA; identified William Berger, not , as the attorney handling the matter; and reported that "[s]ources saki] they believe[dj Berger wasn't involved in Rothstein's scam." Id. A source described the Epstein fabrications as "one of Rothstein's more profitable creations," and told the New Tunes to "'[t]hink of the legitimate Epstein civil case as a car on the road.. . . (t)hen think of that car driving off the road onto heavy terrain and Aimut into four-wheel drive. That's what happened here, and Rothstein was at the wheel.'" + +#### B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint + +On November 9, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office y r the Southern District of Florida filed a civil forfeiture action against certain property cl ik9) hstein. The complaint said Rothstein "and others" had been operating a Ponzi sche si e 5. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09 cv-61780-WJZ DE-1 ¶ 13.) The Government alle j ,h i dthstein had told potential investors that his firm had negotiated settlements bet I vt ents and would-be defendants and that, under the terms of these settlements, urn' lients would receive substantial payments in exchange for not filing "civil chi' s al harassment and other labor-related cases." (Id. ¶ 14.) Rothstein offered inves rs an portunity to purchase these settlements at a discount. (Id.) The firm's clients woul cricrirve less money, but they would be paid immediately in a lump sum. (Id.) Over time, " e inves rs would receive the full value of the clients' settlements. (Id.) The problem, thcabyernment alleged, was that the settlements were not real. (Id.1 15.) Rothstein used es ors' money to pay older investors the money they were supposed to receive from the phony settlements they thought they had purchased. (Id.) + +#### C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009 + +On November 12, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone." Sally Kestin and Peter Franccschina, FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 12, 2009.3 The Sun-Sentinel reported that "[t]he FBI confirmed Thursday what many have speculated since the Scott Rothstein scandal broke: The flashy lawyer could not have defrauded investors of hundreds of millions without help. 'I do not believe that this was a one-man show,' said John Gil lies, head of the FBI in South Florida." Id. + +## D. The on, \\ Investors' Complaint s >- + +On November 20, 2009, William Scherer, the attorney quoted in th es article on November 6, 2009. sued Rothstein. David Boden, Debra la, ndre mett, TD Bank, N.A., Spinosa. Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsk Preve on behalf of investors Razorback Funding, LLC, D3 Capital Club, L nvestment, LLC, Linda Von Allmen (as trustee of the Von Allmen Dynasty T artners, LP, and Kretschmar. (I 7th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943A S lbc ith -3.) The plaintiffs alleged Rothstein had "devised an elaborate plan to assign p Q \* e ....,pl tiffs' confidential settlements with structured payments to investors at a lump s is ted rate. In reality, while some of the cases relied upon to induce investor fun e real, all of the confidential settlements were purely fabricated. Indeed. retu earlier investors were not made via structured payments, but instead were made with a principal obtained from later investors—a classic Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ 2.) The plaint i I s er alleged that Investors were told that the Principal Conspirators had an exten ouse private investigative team, including former F.B.I. and C.I.A. agents, whose singular t sk was to obtain compromising evidence against high-profile putative defendants. Rothstein's story was that the evidence and surveillance acquired. often supporting civil causes of + +&#x27; Available at http:// http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009- I I -12/live/fl-rothstein-associates-200911 12\_l\_rothstein-rosenfeldt-adler-scott-rothstein-alan-sakowitz. + +action ranging from sexual harassment to mass tort cover-ups to whistle-blower claims, was presented to the putative defendant who was then offered an opportunity to avoid litigation and the negative publicity associated therewith by agreeing to resolve the matter voluntarily by and through a confidential settlement with the putative plaintiff.” (*Id.* ¶ 28.) The investors alleged that “Rothstein would show investors the purported settlement agreement in an attempt to substantiate the deal; however, because the settlements were pre-suit and confidential, the names of the putative plaintiffs and putative defendants were redacted.” (*Id.* ¶ 34.) + +The investors further alleged “the purported settlements, *albeit* fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by RRA”—including one of Edwards’ cases against Epstein: + +One of the settlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous billionaire financier. In fact, RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein’s alleged victims in a civil case styled *Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein*, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered “the opportunity” to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set of operative facts as the *Jane Doe* case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff. . . . To augment his concocted story Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker’s boxes of actual case files in *Jane Doe* in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard Epstein’s private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered \$200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein did not yet know about. . . . + +Additionally, Rothstein used RRA’s representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation, but potentially beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. For instance, RRA relentlessly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age women were on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein’s lies. + +(Id. ¶¶ 40-41.) + +The investors also alleged that, "even after Rothstein's October 27, 2009 departure to Morocco, millions of dollars continued to flow out of RRA accounts from the Fort Lauderdale TD Bank accounts, indicative of an insider(s) maintaining operations of the Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ I 02c.) The investors further alleged that "[a] Ponzi scheme cannot be operated wit ut insider help. Plaintiffs believe that additional members of RRA, including its non-lave gators, were used by Rothstein to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi s e details of these individuals['] or entities['] involvement¶ and participation is pr ently un nown but further allegations and counts will be added as discovery is conduc information concerning the complicity of these individuals or entities is confirmed." + +#### E. Cited News Coverage: November + +On November 24, 2009, The Mia rinted an article entitled "Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries w fi ." Jay Weaver & Scott Hiaasen, Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid solar s I firm, The Miami Herald, Nov. 24, 2009. According to the article, "Rothstein's law irm g erated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70 lawyer firm had a payroll 18million, prosecutors said. Rothstein, who owned half of Rothstein Rosenfeldt AdleS,used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said.- Id. Q r 'cle further reported that "[t]he civil forfeiture is based on money-laundering al leg at othstein amassed his fortune by defrauding investors, prosecutors said. Investors bought shires in his fabricated confidential settlements from employment-discrimination and other civil cases during the past four years — investments that promised returns of up to 40 percent.- Id. + +#### F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors + +On November 23, 2009, and November 27, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed amended civil forfeiture complaints against Rothstein's + +property. (S.D. Ha. Case No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ DE-14, DE-19.) The Government again alleged that Rothstein "and others" had been running a Ponzi scheme. See id. + +Scherer filed an amended complaint on behalf of the investor plaintiffs on November 25, 2009. (See 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.) The amended complaint quoted a November 23, 2009, interview of Rothstein by the Sun-Sentinel: "Rothstei . . stated that `karma has caught up with him, but it will catch up with others too . . . Yo n a n full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at t . ¶ 7.) The plaintiffs did not amend their allegations concerning the cases against r. ee generally 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.) + +## G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Inform tucc • h,.), + +On December 1, 2009, the FBI arrested Rot igt \ft •ri r e United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a c ' Si icinformation against him. The information identified RRA as a criminal enterprise D.. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-J1C DE-1 ¶ 2.) The government alleged that, from 200 u it ember 2009, Rothstcin and others had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activi that i eluded mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to launder m ybr(Id. ¶¶ 3-4.) According to the Government, Rothstein and his unidentified co-co t piratt had operated a Ponzi scheme and obtained \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud. (/ lit) The Government repeated its allegations that Rothstein had lied to investors, + +The amended complaint misquotes the article slightly. "'You're hurting my daughter, you're hurting my son,' [Rothstein] said. (Rothstein has a biological daughter who is 16, and the son he's talking about is someone he took on as a sort of mentor, he said this summer.) `Haven't I already hurt them enough?' he asked, before delivering a final 'message' and hanging up. He called back this evening, responding to a text message. He said karma is going to get him, but it's going to get other people, too. 'You're in a town full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at that.' Brittany Wallman, Scott Rothstein: "You're in a town full of thieves", S. Ha. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 23, 2009. Available at littp://www.sun-sentinel.com/s11-intblog-2009- I I -Scott rothstein\_havent\_i\_hurt-story.html. + +(fr. at I + +Q. Complaint in this action alleges that L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her alleged damages. What does that mean? + +had told them that his firm had settled certain sexual harassment and whistleblower cases on behalf of its clients and obtained sizeable payouts, and had offered investors the opportunity to purchase these phony settlements at a discount. (Id. ¶¶ 10-11.) The Government alleged that Rothstein and his co-conspirators had "created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements," and "made false statements to current investors in order to convince them 14 re-invest in additional purported confidential settlement agreements." (Id ¶¶ 21, 23.) + +#### II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND AFFID CARDING PROBABLE CAUSE + +## A. Epstein's Deposition—March 17, 2010 + +Epstein testified as follows: + +Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +A. L.M. is part of a conspiracy with Scott Ro -- creating fraudulent cases of a sexu already charged the firm of Rothstei a partner, with creating, fabricate respect to me, specifically, in of millions of dollars. 4B dley C) creating -- excuse me nature iniwich the U.S. Attorney has which is a partner, was s cases of a sexua nature, inc uding cases with e unsuspecting investors in South Florida out + +Q. What role do you cont d L. ayed in that conspiracy to create fraudulent cases? + +A. L.M.'s testimon fore s e met Mr. was dramatically -- sworn testimony to the FBI was dramati erent after she came in contact with Mr. JM, where her testim then hanged to sort of a hostile and had claims o -- c aims never made before, made to anyone before, and allegations that I've read in her Complaint that that Cy n matically different from the ones she had spoken to the FBI about, sir. + +A. I believe that as part of the scheme to defraud investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across the board. And the only way -- in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what I've read in the paper, claims that I've settled cases for \$200-million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of serious sum of money, which is outrageous. + +(Tr. at 19:7-20:1.) + +Q. Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against him? + +A. Yes, many things. + +Q. List them for me, please. + +A. He has -- he has gone to the media out of, I believe, in an attempt to gin He has contacted the media. He has used the media for his own pu discovery -- he has engaged in discovery proceedings that bear no filed against me by any of his clients. His firm, which he's the of forging a Federal Judge's signature. allegations. has brought hip to any case as been accused + +(Tr. at 23:4-19.) + +Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt to and cn aged in what you contend to be irrelev personally, do that forms the bas' up, unquote, these allegations proceedings, what else did Mr. wsuit? + +A. Mr. personally, engaged wi jail cell, potentially for the rest of hi -- excuse me -- what I've read name on it, with other attorne alleging multi-million dol millions of dollars. He the FBI and the U.S. A enterprise. rs, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal hared information, what I've been told and papers, 13 boxes of information that had my . He counseled his clients to maintain a position in order for them to scam local investors out of any of his other partners already under investigation by ve been accused by the U.S. Attorney of running a criminal + +A. can think of at the moment? + +Q. What media did Mr. go to? + +A. I am aware of at least the Daily News in New York City. I have been told by other people that there were other media, local media. I've been told that the — his investigator was sent to California to harass people representing his -- Brad l= investigator— representing fictitiously, fraudulently that he was a FBI agent to try to gather information for Mr. claims. + +Anything else? + +(Tr. at 25:6-26:15.) + +Q. What does an investigator going to California have to do with Mr. allegedly going to the media in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these allegations? + +A. ... It's part of Mr. scheme to involve people who have nothing to do with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back to the media and gin up his stories and make false allegations of people that have sexually charged nature cases in order to attempt to fleece investors, local investors out of millions of dollars. His firm has been accused the U.S. Attorney of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators, by illegal wire s by illegal methods of eavesdropping in order to go to the media and generate cases"is + +Q. When did Mr. go to the Daily News? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. How did he go to the Daily News? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. What did he say to the Daily News? + +A. I believe Mr. knows that. I doty'LkiMy exactly what he said. + +Q. What is the source of your informatics at h went to the Daily News at all, ever? + +A. It's attorney/client. + +Q. You said you were told ol\$er people that he went to other media representatives? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are other 15eople that told you that? + +A. I do II It the moment. + +Q. these other people who you don't remember tell you Mr. did with 4t gpect to other media representatives besides the Daily News? + +0 + +A. Again, the question again? + +Q. What did these other people tell you Mr. did with respect to going to other media? + +A. Mr. went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medias and making statements to local press regarding false claims made by his clients in order that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail. could defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +Q. When did these other people whose identity you can't remember tell you these things that Brad did. + +A. Sometime in the past year. + +Q. How many other people were there who told you these things about Mr. Ed + +A. I don't recall with specificity. + +A. I would say, probably five to ten. + +Q. Well, do you recall in any degree how many there were? O + +Q. Where were you when these conversations took place t . can't// -- the identity of those participants you can't remember? + +Mr. Pike: So we're clear, within the last year -- correct -. ise? + +Mr. Scarola: Well, that's what your client said. \ I eve a word he says, but that's what he said. + +A. Again, sir? + +Q. Yes, sir. Where did t se con \*i l rsations with these five to ten people take place whose identity you can't reme r? + +A. On the te/ephone. + +Q. Why, maimed the phone calls? A + +A. ese questions, I have no -- I don't have any recollection. + +Q. Did the people who were on the phone identify themselves or were these anonymous callers? + +A. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I don't recall with specificity. + +Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly communicate to the Daily News to quote, gin up these allegations, unquote? + +A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. — not quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred to as Mr. statements. + +Q-Would you read the question back, please, Sandy? + +A. He alleged that third parties had already been involved in some allegations to do with sexual misconduct. A Cots + +Q. Which third parties? + +A. I don't recall sitting here today. + +Q. Involved how? + +A. If I recall with specificity, if I had the articles in f n Maybe next time. I would be able to recall. + +Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean?S \ + +• • • + +A. It means craft allegations of mu data of \$50-million, settl partners to fleece based on cases that didn' Emil \r dollar cases; in fact, alleging in L.M.'s case order for Scott Rothstein and the rest of Mr. ng investors out of millions and millions of dollars eged cases that I had settled. + +(Tr. at 28:14-33:21.) + +Q. you. Was your referen note, gin up these allegations, unquote, a reference to allegations made agai you. + +A. AS p e vast conspiracy of the Rothstein firm and Mr. participation in it, it has bQen alleged that many cases were fraudulently brought -- alleged that have been brought; ginned up, meaning, crafted, multi-million dollar numbers put on cases in order to fleece investors, where his partner, Scott Rothstein, currently sits in jail for just those purposes, Mr. Scarola. + +Q. My question to you is: Did the reference to, quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations against you? + +A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper reports. + +(Tr. at 34:3-22.) + +- Q. What specific discovery proceedings did Mr. engage in which you contend form the basis for your lawsuit? +- A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. +- Q. Which various people? Who? +- A. For example, he tried to depose Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of g he and his firm could fraudulently steal, craft money from unsus Florida out of millions of dollars. city so that tors in South + +('Tr. at 36:10-23.) + +- Q. You said something about Mr. sharing 13 x formation with somebody - +- A. Yes. +- Q. -- as forming part of the basis for you +- A. Correct. ainst Mr. correct? +- Q. All right. With whom did s share these 13 boxes of information? +- A. It has been reported in a Sc r Complaint that he shared those boxes with the partners of his firm that was th o ally accused by the U.S. Attorney, sir, of being a criminal enterprise. +- Q. +- A. +- Q. Do yone ?Sher my question? me who he shared it with? +- A. The partners of his firm, sir. +- Q. Okay. So part of the basis of your lawsuit is that Mr. own law firm to see 13 boxes of information; is that correct? allowed members of his +- A. No, that's not co claim is that the 13 boxes of information that were shown to investors by Mr. partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by the press contain multiple cases, fraudulently -- and if you like the word -- fabricated in order to fleece + +investors out of money. The 13 boxes were shared with investors, Mr. Mr. partners and some of those partners currently under indi[ct]ment, t e others already sitting in jail. + +(Tr. at 37:18-38:22.) + +Q. Which newspaper said which case was fabricated? + +A. Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were fabricated, to my best recoil ion. The Scherer complaint alleged many fabricated cases, sir. + +(Tr. at 39:7-12.) + +Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against Mr. whit basis of this lawsuit is something having to do with sen mg a Would you tell me, please, more specifically what it is that to sendin an investigator to California which you cont Mr. ?] S end i form the or to California. ards did with regard a legal claim against + +A. Reported widely in the newspapers is the by the Rothstein firm while Mr. Edwa investigator, Mr. Fisten, who's menti agent, falsely represented himself I activities, wire taps, and methods asically been bringing these cases. The Complaint, represented himself as an FBI gent. + +Do you have any personal in California? nything that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was + +A. I'm sorry. Basest/74r attorney/client privilege, I can't answer. + +(Tr. at 48:9-49:1 + +Q. Is it Ntition that Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap? + +A. I ely reported in the newspaper -- + +Q. not asking [if] it was reported -- + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. -- in the newspaper. + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. I want to know whether your contention is that Mr. wire tap. was involved in an illegal + +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. ever having engaged in any illegal wire tap? + +- A. I have no personal knowledge; however, what I read in the newspapers d widely reported is that his firm, and I believe Mr. Sakowitz went to the FBI after Ewa Id that the firm was engaged in illegal wire taps and his partners were engaged i tal wire taps. The FBI, the U.S. Attorney has accused his firm of RICO, being the 'mina) fraud enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in illegal w\* ut the answer specifically to your question about personal knowledge, sir, no + +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers in partners were involved in illegal wire to newspapers quoted as sophisticated meth investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a knowledge, myself, sir, no. a that Mr. firm, his fact gathering, using what the kowitz, who was approached as an , alleges similar activities. But personal + +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspaper that his firm and his partners were involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired former FBI and law enforcement officials in order to fabricate cases of a sexually charged nature against me and others. + +Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. iyy tav been involved in any illegal or improper eavesdropping? + +- Q. Do you have any personal It ge hat obstructions of justice? was ever involved in + +- A. It's attorney/client privi C r,i'm afraid. + +- A. Qeof the newspapers, which have accused his firm of a monstrous fraud, purported e largest fraud in South Florida's history, accused by the U.S. Attorney, where his paatner sits in jail -- excuse me -- reported in the newspapers of boxes of material on Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot answer that question because of attorney/client privilege. + +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that ever forged Federal Court Orders and/or Opinions? + +- A. It's attorney/client privilege. + +Do you have any nal knowledge that actionabl uds? was ever involved in any + +Q. Y you ever see, hear, smell, taste, or touch anything that communicated to you and not through the report of some third person or newspaper that w personally involved in compromising the core values of both State an era justice systems in South Florida. + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge were unsupportable? ever filed legal papers that + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that was ever involved in the marketing of non-existent Epstein settlements? + +A. I'm sorry. I would like to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege I cannot today. + +Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were subject to, quote, abusive investigat y tactics. Other than those matters previously referred to in earlier questions, is it yo r ntention that had any personal involvement in any other, ote, usive investigatory tactics? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers that Mr. -- wildly abusive practices throughout the State of Flori investors out of millions of dollars. The U.S. Att engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. Mr. S amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. I have attorney/client privileged information, regard' engaged in widely o fleece unsuspecting omplaint alleges his firm mplaint alleges monstrous knowledge, separate from the ards. + +A. I'm afraid it's attorney/clie + +Q. Do you have any perso that, quote, compromi Florida? edge that Mr. was ever involved in any conduct core values of both State and Federal justice systems in South + +A. Can t -- can you define for me what you mean by "personal knowledge," sir? + +Mr. Pike: Form. Same instruction with regard to attorney/client. + +A. Yes. Are you suggesting that anyone who told me specifically or things that I might have read that specifically relate to him, is not what you've been asking me for? + +Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly right. + +A. You told me if I hear something, that's not personal knowledge. + +Q. Not if you hear it from somebody else. + +A. Who else would I hear it from, besides somebody else, sir? + +Q. Well, if you heard it directly yourself. + +A. From who? + +Q. Maybe Mr. + +A. Uh-huh. Is that the only person, sir? + +Q. That's the only person, that's correct. CSSA + +A. Well, if it's the only person, separate from attorney/client rivi l)cannot answer that. + +(Tr. at 49:13-55:22.) + +Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a purpose i st,fs lawsuit -- + +A. Yes. + +Q. -- to vindicate the hardworking and est fa yers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is of this Complaint. + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are those hardwo ing all4honest lawyers on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint? + +A. Yes. The 41S. Att ey, sir, has accused the Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system le cl of abuse never seen before in the United States history, of forging docu en an affront to any decent lawyer, signing Judge's Orders, sending false enez, Its o other lawyers. The people who have been -- excuse me -- the Complaint by . Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the law firm, as well as Mr. -- my mplaint says, Mr. being a part of that. + +(Tr. at 57:2-57:25.) + +Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking and honest lawyers" are that are referred to in that section of your Complaint. + +A. My attorneys, at least. arc honest. + +Q. Which ones? + +A. All of them. + +Q. And you say that you want to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients? + +A. That's correct. + +Q. Which clients? + +A. Me, some of the other clients, in fact, abused by the Rothstein firm. I don't the full extent. Hopefully when we get to trial, we're oin to find out the exte ple, the lawyers, the clients that were abused by Mr. and the Rothst e have asked for Scott Rothstein's deposition. We hopefully will get it. will give us some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact, been handletra y a uses they've undergone, including forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. + +(Tr. at 59:11-25.) + +Q. And did you mean to say what this sentence says, endeavored to vindicate the hardworking and h adversely affected by the misconduct that is t tein racketeering enterprise is and their clients, who were f this Complaint?" + +Mr. Pike: Okay. I'm going to move to strike. is cterizes the language of the document. The document reads as follows, for s the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromi c re values of both State and Federal justice systems in South Florida and t. the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adverse! y the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint." + +Q. Is that what you meant + +A. What I meant to 't is - seems to me somewhat unclear -- is that the Rothstein firm, along with Mr. s, is part of a criminal enterprise, the largest -- excuse me — the largest cr rise in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, engaging in ille•a w taps, illegal behaviors. And part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which mea' ie e should set right. And if it's not clear, the Rothstein firm compromised the of our legal justice system. It abused every — many of the precepts, the most on ues of the American justice system. And, in fact, I believe this lawsuit, part of the for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the various techniques of attorney/client p ' ilege, abuse of techni ue abuse of discovery, illegal wire taps, forging signatures engaged in by both Mr. and his firm. + +Q. So it is your contention that Mr. was part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Yes, it is. + +Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Attorney/client privilege. + +(Tr. at 62:13-64:3.) + +Q. What knowledge do you have of Brad ever having personally engaged in mail fraud? + +A. It's been widely reported in the press. + +Q. I'mgoing to withdraw my question. What person knowledge do yo e of Bradley ever having been engaged in any mail fraud? + +A. Will you describe what you mean by "personal knowledge," sip + +Q. I mean direct observation through your senses on your pa + +A. So are you asking me whether or not I've witnes ending something directly, putting physically in the mail, sir? + +Q. I'm asking whether you have ever person Sy sed ever having engaged in mail fraud. + +A. I'm not sure how that's possible iddyl6 witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's done? + +Q. So the answer to my questi i t y aiel on't know; is that correct? + +A. My answer to your qu ... I've asked for a clarification. + +Q. Have you ever personally witnessed engaging in mail fraud? + +A. No, s' + +Q. ver personally witnessed Edward -- engaged in wire fraud? + +A. w would one -- I'm not sure how anyone would personal -- have personal knowledge, wi ess someone engaging in wire fraud, unless they were simply sitting over their computer looking at their bank accounts. So, unfortunately, I would have to say, no, sir. + +Q. Have you ever personally witnessed engaged in money laundering? + +A. Again, sir, the U.S. Attorney's Complaint of the Rothstein firm alleges money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, RICO claims of Mr. partners and his firm, calling the firm the largest criminal enterprise in South Florida's history, accused of fabricating malicious cases, sir, of a sexually charged nature in order to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of millions of dollars. + +Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever personally participated in any of that wrongdoing? + +A. I'm afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +Q. Do you have any evidence — knowledge of any evidence whatsoever It 1 r. dwards ever participated in any effort to market any kind of investment in milt + +A. I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence whatsoever dwards was ever a participant in devising a plan through which were sol ed confidential assignments of a structured payout settlement? + +A. The newspapers and blogs have widely typo firm crafted — would you repeat the question for me, again, sir? + +Q. Yes sir. I want to know whether personally ever participate confidential assignments of a st y knowledge of evidence that vis g a plan through which were sold purixte out settlement? + +A. I'd like to answer that y saying that the newspapers have reported that his firm was engaged in fraudu ctured settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. With t to my personal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward to e point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to assert the attom client ivilege. + +Q. You t alleges that Rothstein and others in RRA were using RRA to market i .. Who are the others referred to in the Complaint? + +A. a ny understanding of the U.S. Attorney's Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it is the partners and people who held themselves out to be partners of the Roth -- Scott Rothstein, including Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. and other people associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane M, if that's how you pronounce her name, Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. + +Which -- which source of information referenced in that answer specifically made reference to Mr. + +A. I don't know. + +(Tr. at 74:4—8.) + +Q. Do you have any information indi anyone associated with the Rot statements were made about t Epstein and the value there AS /SCIC)C that dley ever had any knowledge of holding meetings during which, quote, "false of cases/clients that existed or RRA had against + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +Q. But you do have a recollection that one or more of them did: is that correct? + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 64:20-69:6.) + +Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers, sir, that the Rothstein firm en sifting through many people's garbage in order -- in an attempt to blackmail t + +(Tr. at 74:5-10.) + +Q. Yes. I'd like to know what the answer to that question is. anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? + +A. My best recoil on is the .S. Attorney has accused the Rothstein firm of just those types of meetings whe rtners got together, schemed to defraud local investors of millions of dollars fabr flog cases of a sexually charged nature. And whether Mr. persona rticipated, I'm going to at least today, sir, have to assert the attorney c lent privi :47) bu k forward to one day disclosing it. + +(Tr. at 7 5.) + +Q. graph 23 of your Complaint says that: "RRA, Rothstein and a claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clientnhr, were able to effectively use initials," et cetera. Do you have any knowledge that fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? + +• • • + +A. I believe Mr. Scherer's Complaint -- + +Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. I'm not asking about any evidence that you have. + +• • • + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and his claim against the Rothstein firm for a massive fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to — at least in the -- described in the public press, because he went to the FBI for fabricating cases that included initials. With respect to anything specific with Mr. I'm going to have to claim the attorney/client privilege today, sir. + +Q. S ave any -- do you have knowledge of the existence of any evi that knew that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Po e ? + +A. That's attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that w have known that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as fp a Ponzi scheme? should + +A. And today I'm going to have to asse y/client privilege. ... Separate from the communication I've had with my a s, l n't answer that question. + +(Tr. at 77:19—80:6.) + +Q. Do you have any evide the sale of an interest i personal injury lawsuits? sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with + +A. The newsp rs ha a widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settleme cases of a sexual nature, including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the d i r en m Mr. and his firm and we have not been able to get them as of ye .nfident that once we do, I will be able to answer your questions with more + +Q. ou sit here today, do you have any evidence whatsoever to support an assertion that M, individually and personally, sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? + +A. You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege to the answer, I'm afraid, but I'd like to answer that question. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence indicating that ever reached agreements to share attorney's fees with non-lawyers? + +A. In fact, Mr. Scarola, we have subpoenaed Mr. documents and documents from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me more specificity with the answers to that question. I'm looking forward to getting the -- that specific evidence. With respect to what we currently know, sitting here today, I'm unfortunately going to have laim my attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you today have any evidence to support an assertion that s ever used investor money to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front money they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +A. I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client privi afraid, though I'd like to answer that question as well, sir. + +Q. Do you have any evidence to support the iollythat conducted searches, wire taps or intercepted conve lation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. Your question, once again asked di eavesdropping? Did he walk to he, personally, stand outsid behavior in an attempt t attorney has filed a Co that his firm did. The subpoenaed used my na not received any. as Mr. personally involved in the ouse and sort of ut a bug in their house? Did estion is, did Mr. firm engage in this I investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. g that they did. The Complaints filed by Scherer saying omplaint says my name and the boxes of files that we've sir. We have requested information, but up until today have e you a more specific answer, I'm afraid I cannot. + +Q. Do you know edge of any evidence that ever conducted searches, wirecs pted conversations in violation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. a newspapers and the U.S. Attorney's Complaint widely reported that Mr. fi and people hired by his firm, investigators hired by his firm fraudulently representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in just those activities, sir. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that was ever aware of any such activities. + +A. I'm going to have to -- ... assert the attorney/client privilege to that, sir. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge that ever participated in or was aware of actions that utilized the judicial process, including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +• • • + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South Florida's history engaged in by Mr. film and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, not only illegal wi taps and eavesdropping, but an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe s or itself. Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. today, I'm going to hcto rt the attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + +Q. ,it air contention that Mr. Scherer's Complaint even cotta name + +A. 1 don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 83:11-88:18.) + +Q. What are the dame es du.. .claim to haves consequence of any wrongdoing on the part of + +A. The cost of ridiculous litigation, of attorneys prepare responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various locat inimum, sir. + +Q. Which lawyers? + +A. Burman Critton, Jack G C o)leoe nd a bunch of the others, sir. + +Q. Which ones? the me me, please. + +A. Specifically -- I h thlt" many lawyers defending me here against Mr. I can't sit here -- at t om t I can't recall it with specificity. + +Q. You ber any of your lawyers' names? + +A. + +Q. B 'des Mr. -- besides the Burman Critton firm and Mr. Goldberger? + +A. Are you asking me for the firm, sir, or are you asking me for the names? + +Q. I want as much information as you can give me about this element of damage which you claim; and, that is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be damages in this case. + +A. Okay.... Mr. Roy Black. + +Q. Okay. Who else? + +- A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. Mr. Jay Lefkowitz. The firm of Burman Critton Luttier. That's it for the moment. + +- Q. How much have you paid the law firm of Burman Critton and Luttier which you claim is damages? + +- A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. + +- Q. How much? + +- A. I don't have that figure offhand. + +- Q. Can you give us any better figure than hundreds of thousands of dol + +- A. No, not sitting here today. + +- Q. Are you paying them on an hourly basis? C.) + +- A. Yes, sir. + +- Q. What is the hourly rate at which you are compe tt c nbers of the law firm? + +- A. They're ordinary rates. + +- Q. What are they? "(SiNr s + +- A. I don't know. + +- Q. How much have you paid ol erger? + +- A. I'm not aware total am + +- Q. What is the hourl at which you're paying Mr. Goldberger? + +hourly I !is norms ,hourly + +- Q. +- Q. FlotinA is at? + +- A. I do ow. ) + +- Q. H v much have you paid Mr. Black which you claim as damages in this case? + +- A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +- Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +- A. I believe so. + +- Q. What is the hourly rate? + +A. I'm not -- I do not know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? + +A. I don't know the exact amount, sir. + +Q. What's your best estimate? + +A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +A. I believe so. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +Q. At what hourly rate? + +A. I believe so. + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. How much are you pa -- how much have you paid Jay Lefkowitz? + +A. I'm not sure, sir. + +Q. Do you e any i a at all? + +A. Mo a h ndred thousand dollars. + +Q. A aying him on an hourly basis? + +A. , sir. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. What is the form of payment to your lawyers? How do you transfer money to them? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +CO'S-A + +Q. Pardon mc? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? + +A. I would guess so. + +Q. Who? + +A. I don't know. + +° ISA + +Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart from the money lawyers? + +A. The stress and emotional damage of itnpe s + +Q: Was the value of any of the three cases discussed at all? + +A: No. CO + +Q: Did Mr. Rothstein, did Mr. Rothstein appear to be knop led able about your cases? + +A: No. + +Q: Mr. Adler. was Mr. Adler someone that yo regular basis ... not content. Was Mr. A cases with prior to that meeting? d the cases with on a somewhat eo e that you had discussed these Epstein + +A: Yes. + +Q: What lawyers, other thin ;b -ou , were involved in the Epstein cases during the time you were associated with R ? + +A: What do you mea if ere involved?' I guess all. + +Q: What, w cases awyersractually worked on the file? I know Mr. Berger worked on the Epstein + +March 23, 2010, Tr. at 1 ) + +A: ited capacity, correct. + +Q: Mr. Adler I know attended Mr. Epstein's deposition, correct? + +A: Correct. + +March 23, 2010, Tr. at 230:15-231:1.) + +Deposition—October 10, 2013 + +testified as follows: + +Q: Okay. At the meetings that you -- at the meetings that occurred with these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, =, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that -- discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein ever discussed? + +A: I -- I would assume so. + +Q: Well, I -- + +A: In meetings, that we were talking about, was Epstein discussed? + +Q: Yeah, l -- I -- I assume, based upon the what we saw in the e-mails tod actly the purpose of the meeting, correct? + +A: Exactly, that was the purpose of the meeting. + +C O + +C. =. Deposition—November 10, 2017 + +testified as follows: + +So there is some truth that Rothstein is wea Aik %4Ap i on documents, the flight log that was obtained by you as the lead trial la r e nding lawsuits? + +A: There is some truth in the pending I its? yy + +Q: No. I'm saying that what Rot oing -- we all -- + +A: He used actual evidence fabricated story. + +Q: And the actual eviden hat as referred to here are these flight logs that you as the lead lawyer obtained nd brou t back to the Rothstein firm, right? + +A: I maintain evi nce for all of my cases at the Rothstein firm where I worked, yes. + +Q: That' 1 I confirming. + +(A: r that Rothstein gained access to it and used it to support his fairytale? It + +Oct. 10, 2013, Tr. at 205:9-22.) + +ov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 163:20-164:14.) + +Q: Were you reporting to Mr. Adler in how to represent the three Rothstein clients -- the three ladies -- on how to prosecute the Epstein matters? + +A: Well, this email is dated April 8th, 2009, so I had just started at the firm. I had just got there. Russ Adler was one of the only lawyers that I had known for years before I got to the firm. And Russ Adler handled sexual abuse cases. So, especially in the beginning, I talked to Russ about how to kind of navigate through the complications with Jeffrey Epstein and with the type of + +defense that was going on. So this just appears that Wayne Black and Russ Adler -- Wayne was the investigator -- that they were talking also about how to -- what we needed to do in the investigation. Yeah, Russ was definitely involved then. He didn't do much in the day-to-day, so I don't want to say anything to that. + +Q: I understand. But I'm talking about on April 8th, 2009, it looks to me like he's giving you instructions on what to do. Do you agree? + +A: Not giving me instructions on what to do. I mean, he's telling me bring M Nurik the non-prosecution agreement, is the instruction. + +Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 259:22-260:22) + +Q: Did you become aware of the fact that your Epstein-related files t nt in time had been requested by Scott Rothstein? + +A: Yes. + +Q: How did you become aware of that? + +A: I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +Q: Was there any explanation offered as to, h co Rothstein wanted to see the Epsteinrelated files? + +A: That if these cases went to trial, nte o try the cases with me. + +Q: He who? + +A: He, Scott Rothstein, w the case with me. That's the explanation that I was given. + +Nov. 10, 201 Tr. at :14-322:2.) + +Q: You we em oyee, in your mind, and he was the lawyer ultimately at the firm responsible for tree cl ents, true? + +A: The ty lawyers at the firm. They all work for him. Hundreds of files. He's still the equity e firm, so they are the firm's files. They are not -- + +nderstand. You told me earlier. And I didn't realize that, that the interest that A had in three files, you gave up to Mr. Rothstein and became a salary employee, essentially. + +A: Gave up to RRA. + +Q: Mr. Rothstein's firm, correct? + +A: Right. We've established this. + +Q: And so that Mr. Rothstein was the lawyer at that firm as the -- one of two equity shareholders who was ultimately responsible for the three Epstein matters? + +A: For every case in the entire firm, including those -- + +Q Including the three Epstein matters? + +A: Every case, yeah. + +#### IV. Ad sc V. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY + +( Nov. 10,2017, Tr. at 338:10-339:7.) + +Q: You never spoke to Brad about this case? + +Rothstein testified as follows in this case: + +A: I didn't say that, but I had a lot more interaction . .. If to the people in the finn, if they are honest with you, they'll tell you my interact r more significant with Russ Adler, probably more so because he was a f mine. My interaction with Russ was far greater by many, many percents eraction with Brad, and then you go down the line. I had more interaction w r. er than I did with Mr. Fistos, more interaction with Jaffe than I did with Mr s, and so on. + +(Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 23:24-2 + +Q: Right. How did you know at and you said you were go' was the case that you c en you said these investors wanted to investigate a fake settlement, how did you know that this case + +A: From talking to all the the extent that I that I just said, Adler, Fistos, Jaffe, =, Mr. M, to e to him about it. + +A: I do cific recollection one way or the other. I remember speaking to him at leas brie the day or the day of or the day before the actual investor's due diligence was going on as to what was going on. And I may have spoke to him, I know I spoke to Russ, but may have spoke to him as well within a couple of days just prior to this due diligence be5ause I was trying to at least get some information in my head that I could use when I was creating this story for the investors. + +Did you s k wi about the case? + +(Rothstein's June 14,2012, Tr. at 25:12-26:6.) + +Q: Well, then explain to me. You testified earlier that what was important to the investors to see is that there was a real case, correct? + +A: Yes. + +Q: What did you look at or show them — what did you look at, first of all, to see if it was, in fact, a real case? + +A: I knew it was a real case. + +Q: How did you know? + +A: Because my lawyers told me it was a real case. I believed them. + +Q: What lawyers told you that? + +A: lrea told you it was a mixture of Russ and Jaffe and Fistos a er d Mr. I mean, I knew it was a real case. We had all these boxes ople really working on the file -- + +Q: How do you know -- + +A: --or they were pulling a hell of a scam on me. Not tha 't deserve it but [--] + +Q: How did you know, you just said you knew peop king really hard on this case. Who do you know was working on the case? + +A: The only people that I knew for certain rki g on the case was Brad and Russ Adler was doing his superviso k k, hatever that was. But other than that, I don't know which other lawyers we c isti Mr. I didn't get involved at that level. + +(Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 5it : 5 ea. + +Rothstein testified as f lows • orback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein, 17th Jud. Cir. Case + +No. 062009CA062943 XCE: + +Q: You pull t so kind of a flight manifest; do you recall that? + +A: Yea point in time I believe it was either Brad or Russ Adler pointed o at one of the pieces of evidence they were using in the actual case was the flight And I actually used that to make a fairly big show. I found that those most of e in these cases the more significant our underlying investigation was and the more ta al izing it was, the more interested the investors got. We had that real piece of evidence and we used it to our advantage to attempt to secure the investor. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 59:14-25.) + +Q: Didn't you add some sensational names to the manifest that weren't there to start with? + +A: I did. I did. + +Q: Tell us about that. + +A: There were -- I said that there were additional manifests -- if I remember correctly, I said there were additional manifests that we had discovered containing Bill Clinton's name, Prince Andrew, all being shown flying with young girls on the plane. + +Q: And do you know whether -- let me back up. The original manifests that were in evidence in the real case, didn't have those names on it? + +A: No, but it's interesting you bring that up because the way I came up with Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew was Mr. Adler and Mr. both told me on different oc ions that the reason the case — when we were discussing the actual real case, the n it was becoming so, quote, unquote, tasty because they had information that h d s flying Bill Clinton around and Prince Andrews around, the piece that was miS from the real case was the connection to the young girls. + +Q: The young girls — connection to the young girls was fiction, it + +A: Not as far as Mr. Epstein is concerned but as far as the o iled are concerned, yes. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12,2011, Tr. at 60:10-61:9.) + +Q: When you were asked — this morning about E trds you really hesitated. I don't know if you know you did that. You were wyrn es, no, maybe so. On him you really paused. + +A: On the question as whether or not h&wed h ve turned us in, you mean? + +Q: Whether he was a player or w e ltatvas involved and you didn't quite answer. + +A: Just because of the way d and socialized with him, I did not know that he was at that level. There a ple, Barry M, second he found out about it would have absolutely done w s appropriately — supposed to do from an ethical standpoint. And then there pie who I say would never do that. And then there are people in the middle. I beli is probably in the middle. + +(Rothstein's Ded 1 2011, Tr. at 61:15-62:6.) + +Q: understand. I'm not going to have you go through all 13 boxes, but I'm trying to e of reference. You're talking about a flight manifest or flight manifests for jets, right? + +A: Yes. This is a very small document. It may have been one or two pages. And I had it specifically set aside. I'd either ask Mr. Adler or Mr. to isolate the flight manifest. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 19,2011, Tr. at 2278:13-20) + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Fina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9649b5a094c62c2baa3fd165c71a4a80de012e7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/EFTA02762364.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2794 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 62, + "chars": 110408, + "elapsed_seconds": 26.64, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 113.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 113.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTc ISED OMNIBUS \nMOTION IN LI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 491.08514404296875, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 491.08514404296875, + 362.363037109375 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 362.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.072, + 457.331 + ], + [ + 335.8282775878906, + 457.331 + ], + [ + 335.8282775878906, + 472.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 279.072, + 472.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein Has Repeatedly Made Clear That He Alleged That [REDACTED] Cases Were \"Manufactured\" / \"Ginned Up\" / \"Crafted\" / \"Fabricated\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 586.4399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein Misunderstant thjJDifference Between Direct and Circumstantial \nEvidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 495.5827941894531, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 495.5827941894531, + 492.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 492.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Remaining g Blocks Crumble Under the Weight of the Law and \nthe Uncontested ecord acts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 526.5255126953125, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 526.5255126953125, + 492.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 492.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii The Exhi that pstein Challenges are Not Hearsay When They Are Not Being \nOffered to the Truth of the Matters Asserted.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 505.863037109375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 505.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 255.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 392.6141052246094, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 392.6141052246094, + 80.853515625 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 80.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO C\n0 \nEkDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 223.02227783203125 + ], + [ + 521.905029296875, + 223.02227783203125 + ], + [ + 521.905029296875, + 309.1825866699219 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 309.1825866699219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 326.5770263671875, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 326.5770263671875, + 478.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 478.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.37998962402344, + 527.9678344726562 + ], + [ + 324.2124938964844, + 527.9678344726562 + ], + [ + 324.2124938964844, + 579.0321960449219 + ], + [ + 133.37998962402344, + 579.0321960449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SEAIVP < C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.124, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 372.8406677246094, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 372.8406677246094, + 369.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 369.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE \nSUPPORT OF HIS REVISED 0 \nAPPENDIX IN \nOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 508.7829284667969, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 508.7829284667969, + 367.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 367.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S \nCOMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 534.8677368164062, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 534.8677368164062, + 486.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 486.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Cit N verage: November 3-6, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 367.2008056640625, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 367.2008056640625, + 511.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 511.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 411.966796875, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 411.966796875, + 260.947021484375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 260.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 615.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.4296875, + 615.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.4296875, + 630.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 630.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. The on, \\\\ Investors' Complaint s >-", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 218.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 502.6015319824219, + 218.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 502.6015319824219, + 234.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 234.3170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Cited News Coverage: November", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 366.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 366.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 642.33 + ], + [ + 452.5328369140625, + 642.33 + ], + [ + 452.5328369140625, + 656.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 656.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Inform tucc \u2022 h,.),", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 384.4493713378906, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 384.4493713378906, + 340.8170471191406 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 340.8170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND AFFID CARDING \nPROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 531.9871826171875, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 531.9871826171875, + 275.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 275.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Deposition\u2014March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 341.7221374511719, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 341.7221374511719, + 299.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 299.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. \nEpstein's Deposition\u2014January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 317.5365295410156, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 317.5365295410156, + 152.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 152.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 331.20294189453125, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 331.20294189453125, + 102.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 102.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. Ad sc \nV. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 486.89410400390625, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 486.89410400390625, + 238.10302734375 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 238.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 293 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 301 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "Text", + 74 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762364" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecd571dd1fadfe6813d3da88171384fa65e073ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:054ff2dfa08199dde31034283e328af1b3876e4de080f85917003fb02f6dc969 +size 3528 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..144d4c93f8d5b314443a27e1e43595e793681311 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762364/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ea749193bcbb92f34aaf3c6c274c1abbb1454a6bd5a4eb5a002b86111f31874d +size 7691 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f0d5f79f3fe7b4bda93a605ed2659b824592abb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** August 3, 2010 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Hon. David F. ██████████ (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +**PLACE:** 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion to Appoint Commissioner + +FILED: +2018 JUL 19 PM 3:33 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this MTR day of July, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2159 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/Counterplaintiff, +██████████ J. ██████████ + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6eff3e4ee3b288e98e9e0d1c427fab073bd3904 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426/EFTA02762426.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762426.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2473, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.18500000000003, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 368.433, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 368.433, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 238.18500000000003, + 363.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.536, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 277.983, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 277.983, + 583.2 + ], + [ + 67.536, + 583.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.08399999999995, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 350.34299999999996, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 350.34299999999996, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 258.08399999999995, + 89.1 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762426" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93b0e6d370a4d871aff1279f2db8fd048791785d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.md @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXX.XMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +-vs- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individual) and J. individually, + +# Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 44\ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES + +Defendant/Counter-PI Defendant/Counter-PI • hereby files this Response to the Motion to Am Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by Plaintiff/Counter- efetZilt l Jeffrey Epstein. For the reasons stated below, the motion shoO 'ed. + +ears after this lawsuit was filed and just prior to a special set trial date, Epstein has filed a motion to amend to raise five new affirmative defenses. No explanation has been offered as to why Epstein waited eight years to raise these defenses. + +This court is authorized to deny such a motion on any of three grounds: that the amendment would prejudice the opposing party, that the privilege to amend has been abused, or that the amendment would be futile. Vaughn v. Boerckel, 20 So.3d 443, 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Each of those three grounds exists here. + +Allowing Epstein to amend his answer to raise five new affirmsS \*v defenses would clearly prejudice since those affirmative defe ise multiple factual issues which would require additional discovery itnesses, and possibly even counterpleading by . Additio Epstein has abused the privilege to amend by failing to raise these a • defenses until eight years into the case, especially since he has mad 'cot n e pt to justify that delay. On each of those grounds alone, this Court sh ny his Motion to Amend. See Levine v. United Companies Life s'"659 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1995); nit .M, 252 Sel l 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). + +Independent of Ititipt his Court should also deny Epstein's Motion to Amend because two f e proposed "affirmative defenses" are not even affirmative defens d the other three are, as a matter of law, not valid defenses to a maliciou rosecution claim. Thus, the amendments would be futile. See McCray v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., 213 So.3d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). + +In State v. 568 So.2d 49, 51-52 (Fla. 1990), the Florida Supreme Court defined an affirmative defense as follows: + +An "affirmative defense" is any defense that assumes the complaint or charges to be correct but raises other facts that, if true, would establish a valid excuse or justification or a right to engage in the conduct in question. + +Here, none of ' five proposed affirmatives defenses provide a valid excuse or justification for the filing of his baseless litigation against is will be discussed in more detail infra + +It should also be noted that a fundamental premise of the five proposed affirmatives defenses is that claim is jally for malicious prosecution, but is really a defamation claim, whi be subject to these new affirmative defenses. However, S alleged a defamation claim against Epstein arising from the cuq s at issue here. Additionally, the Fourth District has specifically ruiaw. pstein's claim of litigation privilege was invalid because it does not malicious prosecution claim, although it does apply to a defamatio iii.....\_ di, 's v. Epstein, 178 So.3d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); and the orid"upreme Court ruled the same way, see Debrincat v. Fischer, 2 3 68 (Fla. 2011). Therefore, as discussed in more detail infra, Epstei ot convert malicious prosecution claim into a defamation cause of action in order to justify these untimely and inapplicable defenses. + +## The Fifth Affirmative Defense + +Epstein contends his underlying lawsuit against was a "form of petitioning government for redress" and therefore cannot prevail unless + +he can show that Epstein's lawsuit was a "sham" under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. This proposed affirmative defense is invalid as a matter of law on multiple levels. + +United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965), and Eastern Railroad Presence Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S 7 (1961), both involved claims of antitrust violations under the federal Act, 15 U.S.C. §1-7. The conduct at issue was a public relations and lobbying efforts designed to cause legislative and executive b of government to enact 9 anticompetitive laws. The Supreme Court h nless those efforts were proven to have been a "sham," they wer c from being antitrust violations by the First Amendment right to the government. At this point it is reasonable to ask what those is s have to do with a malicious prosecution case, and the simple answ is othing. Neither Noerr nor Pennington addressed petitioning the gove in judicial forums, which is governed by a different standard and completely inapplicable to Epstein's baseless lawsuit against Edwart + +Th nited States Supreme Court has made it clear that baseless litigation is not entitled to any protection under the First Amendment right to petition. In Bill Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 461 U.S. 731, 743 (1983), the Court stated: + +en defense assumes the truth o justifi Here, malicious prosec \ "cig o c a. alleges that Epstein's lawsuit against him was baseless. As the Flo 4 reme Court has stated, an affirmative im alleged, and raises a valid excuse or cation for that cond en, supra. Since suit was baseless, an SZPIveU.S. Supreme Court has ruled that baseless litigation receives no t on from the First Amendment right to petition, Epstein's propos Affirmative Defense does not, as a matter of law, state a valid defense. alleges that Epstein's + +Just as false statements are not immunized by the First Amendment right to freedom of speech, see Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 171, 99 S.Ct. 1635, 1646, 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 340, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 3007, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974), baseless litigation is not immunized by the First Amendment right to petition. [Emphasis added] + +The Court has also distinguished judicial proceedings from petitioning jctivity of on doctrine in California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unli U.S. 508, ) the legislature and executive branch in the context of the Ns it 513 (1972), stating: + +Misrepresentations, condoned in the immunized when used in the adjudicato \ arena, are not + +Epstein's proposed Fifth Affirmative Defense is also fatally defective in contending that the "sham" test must be used to evaluate Epstein's lawsuit. The Florida Supreme Court has unequivocally rejected that standard in a + +Turkey Creek, Inc., 609 So.2d 14, 18 (Fla. 1992): + +We decline to adopt the "sham" test because we find that the current law in Florida already provides protection for the First Amendment right to petition the government. + +Moreover, the analysis in is consistent with the that argument e above, i.e. the right to petition under the First Amendme ilit l .,the Federal Constitution, or Article I, §5, of the Florida Constitutio application to immunize nor limit a malicious prosecution claim. + +involved a conflict between developer. The homeowners' association civil action against the developer, and also lobbied local zoning officia s e positions adverse to the developer. The developer prevailed in th c i fion and then brought a claim for malicious prosecution and numerou oth torts against the homeowners' association. The t Florida Supreme Co opst determined whether the developer could maintain a malicious p o action against the homeowners, and determined that claim was via it o.2d at 16-18. Thereafter, the Florida Supreme Court considered whether e other allegedly tortious conduct of the homeowners was protected by the First Amendment right to petition the government. However, the Court specifically did not include the malicious prosecution claim within that analysis, obviously recognizing that defense was inapplicable to such tortious conduct. Id. at 9wners' association and a + +18. In that analysis, the Florida Supreme Court specifically declined to adopt the "sham" test to determine whether the homeowners' lobbying conduct was protected by the First Amendment right to petition, but instead followed its prior decision in Nodar v. Galbreath, 462 So.2d 803 (Fla. 1984). + +In Nodar, the Florida Supreme Court held that where a citizen a sued for statements made at a public school board meeting, the right to tt o njustified a qualified privilege with respect to defamation. But the C that qualified privilege only "eliminated the presumption of frcm ' 'i i ttaching to defamatory statements by law." 462 So.2d at 810. Ho 5 re is no presumption of C4 "malice" in a malicious prosecution cas 't s a separate element of the tort which the plaintiff must prove. Fisc r ebrincat 169 So.3d 1204, 1206 (Ha. 4th DCA 2014), approved, 21 8 (Fla. 2017). As noted by Justice Scalia, a malicious prosecution cla rates a qualified privilege within its elements, Kalina v. IM, 529 118, 133 (1997) (Scalia, J. concurring): + +At co w, therefore, Kalina would have been protected by som= resembling qualified immunity if she were sued for prosecution. The tortious act in such a case would have er decision to bring criminal charges against , and lia911ity would attach only if could prove that the prosecution was malicious, without probable cause, and ultimately unsuccessful. + +i As noted in other filings, acknowledges that in malicious prosecution cases, malic can be inferred from; inter alia; lack of probable cause, gross ar ence, or great indifference to persons on the rights of others. see Durkin v. 814 So.2d 1246, 1248 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2002). However, there is no presumption of malice in malicious prosecution cases. + +Thus, Nodar, cited in Epstein's proposed Fifth Affirmative Defense, is inapplicable here, since malice is not presumed in a malicious prosecution action. + +Finally, Epstein's proposed Fifth Affirmative Defense is fatally defective because his filing of RICO, civil theft, and extortion charges against does not fall within the scope of the right to petition the government. In Robert Welch. Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 350 (1974), the Court rejected • tention that private attorneys, as officers of the court, are "public offic or purposes of the First Amendment. The Court stated: + +Respondent's suggestion would swe Ar t 8 tyd.t ers under the New York Times rule as officers of the 'so the plain meaning of the `public official' category 1 recognition. We decline to follow it. + +Furthermore, in Nodar, concluded that the public ho , eacher was neither an elected nor policy making t official sufficient to or First Amendment protection, even though she was a government e. Thus, as a matter of law, Epstein's underlying suit against Edward constitute petitioning the government for purposes of the First Amendm t or Article I, §5, of the Florida Constitution. Florida Supreme Court followed Gertz and + +## Sixth. Seventh. and Eighth Affirmative Defenses + +Epstein's proposed Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Affirmative Defenses are all premised on his contention that `I ' claims are nothing more than defamation claims which are barred by defenses applicable to defamation claims" (Proposed Answer p.10). That premise is wrong and therefore all three defenses, which can apply only to defamation actions, are invalid as a matter of law. + +The fundamental flaw in these three affirmative defenses is Epstein's characterization of claim as "nothing more than defamatio counterclaims in this proceeding have never included a cou ISi) defamation. Moreover, malicious prosecution is indisputably a separa an dependent tort. Additionally, Epstein's prior attempt to defeat EdwV laim based on a defense to defamation was unsuccessful as a matter ofl\ SivS) + +Previously in this case, Epstein mo 't r mmary judgment arguing, inter alia, that the litigation privilege, w h absolute bar to a defamation claim, barred ' malicious on claim. This Court granted summary judgment, but was reve by e Fourth District based on its determination that t the Third District p ient this Court relied upon should not be followed. v. 4178 So.3d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Epstein sought review in the Flo t • eme Court, but became a "tag along" case to Debrincat v. Fisher, No. SC1 477. In Debrincat, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the litigation privilege did not apply to bar or limit a malicious prosecution claim. Debrincat v. Fisher. 217 So.3d 68 (Fla. 2017). + +Thereafter, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause directing Epstein to show why Debrincat was not controlling in this case (Exhibit A). Epstein responded and conceded that "the petitioner would show no cause why Debrincat is not controlling ..." (Exhibit B). As a result, the Supreme Court declined review. Therefore, Epstein conceded that this action is Alk licious prosecution claim which, unlike a defamation claim, is not bar Ror limited by the litigation privilege. Nonetheless, he now attempts to nv claim into a defamation claim in order to raise multiple affi e defenses. + +Epstein attempts to justify this "conve \ ' string citing cases for the (4 proposition that "a plaintiff may not a e nses that apply to defamation actions by characterizing them as to 'are not subject to those restrictions." (Proposed Answer p.10-11). o ses do not support Epstein's position because none of them involve mal rosecution claims in which the plaintiff properly alleged all elements tot tort. The cases relied upon by Epstein all involve the "single publi iio Ingle action rule" which prohibits multiple claims arising from a single lion upon which a failed defamation claim was based. E.g., Calloway d & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Banyon Lakes C. Corp., 831 So.2d 204, 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). There was no "failed defamation claim" in the case sub iudice, and thus that rule does not apply. Furthermore, none of the cases cited by + +Epstein involved circumstances in which a valid malicious prosecution claim was at issue. + +Also, as noted in Calloway Land, there are two exceptions to the application of the "single publication/single action rule," both of which apply in this case. First, where a plaintiff pleads facts and circumstances other than th jaiid kryfamato statement to support the independent tort, the rule does not a 4wee Ci ., Primarica Financial Services. Inc. v. Mitchell, 48 F.Supp 2d 1363 ( . 999) (cited in Calloway Land, 831 So.2d at 209). Here, Plaint\* c s pled other facts and circumstances since he has successfully pled tIctil pendent tort of malicious prosecution. Therefore the "single publi ict • gle action rule" does not apply, c\ as a matter of law. (s, + +A second exception 5%e le is where the plaintiff did not have a defamation claim. See He C in , .'CBS Broadcasting. Inc., 789 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (cited in wa Land, 831 So.2d at 209), disapproved on other grounds by v. Gannett Co.. Inc., 994 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2008). Here, er alleged a defamation claim against Epstein. Moreover, such a claim wobid have been foreclosed by the litigation privilege which, the Florida Supreme Court has held, does not bar l= malicious prosecution claim. Debrincat supra. + +Based on the above, Epstein's proposed Sixth Affirmative Defense and Seventh Affirmative Defense, which raise defenses solely applicable to defamation claims, are inapplicable, as a matter of law, in this case. + +Additionally, the proposed Sixth Affirmative Defense, which contends that is a "general or limited purpose public figure," fails as a ma f law for another reason. In Gertz, supra, the United States Supreme Ag rejected the contention that a private attorney representing a private d' 0 igation matters became a public figure, even though there was si • t publicity surrounding the case. Here, did nothing to inject • f • to any public controversy relevant to Epstein's lawsuit against hi 4 the Court in Gertz stated (418 U.S. at 352): n;\ + +We would not lightl e that a citizen's participation in community and pro ffairs rendered him a public figure for all purposes. + +The court in Gertz c !Muded that the petitioner, a private attorney, was not a public figure " is participation related solely to his representation of a private client. at 352. + +Fo the same reason, Epstein's contention in his proposed Seventh Affirmative Defense that the matters relevant to Epstein's initial lawsuit "involve a matter of public concern" is invalid. That position is contradicted by the one case Epstein relies upon, Gertz, supra. Therefore, in addition to being a defense to a different tort, the proposed Seventh Affirmative Defense does not apply as a matter of law. + +Epstein's proposed Eighth Affirmative Defense is not actually an affirmative defense. It only contains his legal argument that claims are "nothing more than defamation claims which are bared by defenses applicable t d famation claims as set forth in the defenses above" (Proposed Answer p.1 IS a result, it is not an affirmative defense as defined in =, supra, but statement of a legal proposition. Therefore, allowing Epstein to am s answer to include it as an affirmative defense would be futile. + +# Ninth Affirmative Defense + +In his proposed "Ninth Affirm and statutory principles that gt ards of punitive damages are "not sufficient to assure Epstein due p O ces of law." On a threshold level, this is not an affirmative defense; i 71"40- constitutional challenge to the validity of this Court's proceedings re, denial of leave to amend is warranted. \ fense" I Epstein contends common law + +E roposed "Ninth Affirmative Defenses" does not establish a valid excuse justification for engaging in the conduct alleged in counterclaim as required by =, supra. Instead, it contents that this Court is incapable of providing due process to him in these proceedings as to any award of punitive damages. Epstein does not specify any past proceedings in which this + +Court violated his right to due process with respect to the punitive damages, nor does he identify any possible future proceedings that would violate his due process rights. Thus, the argument he raises is premature but, more importantly, it is not an affirmative defense, as a matter of law. Therefore, there is no basis for this Court to grant him leave to amend his answer to the counterclaim to add it as ia rmative IS defense. + +would note that there are multiple proced 0•• ce to protect a defendant's due process rights in proceedings relatin nitive damages. + +The Florida Supreme Court has consid c established procedures by which the righ litigating punitive damages claims. 502, 506 (Fla. 1994). There, held: ocess principles and has efendant will be preserved when ce & Co.—Conn. v. Waters, 638 So.2d + +When presented timely motion, should bifurcate the determination the a ount of punitive damages from the remaining issues at trial. first stage of a trial in which punitive damages are an i th jury should hear evidence regarding liability for actual s the amount of actual damages, and liability for puni ages, and should make determinations on those issues. If, at t stage, the jury determines that punitive damages are ted, the same jury should then hear evidence relevant to the am nt of punitive damages and should determine the amount for which the defendant is liable. At this second stage, evidence of previous punitive awards may be introduced by the defendant in mitigation. + +Id. at 506. These procedures are meant to eliminate the possibility that a defendant will be prejudiced during the liability phase of the case with presentation of evidence related to the determination of the amount of punitive damages. + +The procedures established by the Florida Supreme Court in W.R. = have been applied consistently to ensure the due process rights of (' d ants are met. See, e.g., Persaud v. Cortes, 219 So.3d 241, 242 (Fla. 5th D;44.17); GEICO Ins. Co. v. =, 209 So.3d 77, 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 2 , ew denied, No. SC17-94, 2017 WL 1732993 (Fla. May 3, 2017); ul Mercury Ins. Co. v. Coucher. 837 So.2d 483, 488 (Fla. 5th DC k, Coming Fiberglas Corp. v. Ballard, 749 So.2d 483, 484 (F19(4Nessanti v. Contreras, 695 So.2d 845, 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Sol Ileven Inc. No. 2:09-CV-807-FTM-29, 2011 WL 241 t 1 . la. June 13, 2011); see also IMV)i ning (3, .2d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (finding no due process violation as ive damage award where defendant did not avail itself of the "pro o ered by the option of bifurcation"). There is no reason why the bi rocess could not also be applied here to ensure that Epstein's due process n is are preserved. + +There are also post-trial procedures available to protect the due process rights of a defendant. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. , 538 U.S. 408, 416 (2003); BMW of N. Am.. Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996). These procedures have been applied consistently to protect the due process rights of defendants where a grossly excessive or arbitrary punitive damage award is awarded. See, e.g., , supra; v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246, 1263 (Fla. 2006); R J Tobacco Co v. Townsend, 90 So.3d 307, k 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Langmead v. Admiral Cruises, Inc., 696A 2d 1189, 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). As + +Finally, the Florida Legislature has enacted a sta fot r eme granting protection to defendants in pretrial and post-trial eedings. See §§768.72, 768.725, 768.73, Fla. Stat. Epstein has failed any shortcoming in this legislative scheme or the procedures ado a Florida Supreme Court which subject him to any violation of his du p s rights. + +Therefore, for the reaso above, Epstein's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses el e denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on November 22, 2017. + +/kbt + ++6s + +Jack Scarola, Esq. SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. A West Palm Beach, FL 33409 eservice®searcylaw.com jsx®searcylaw.com and BURLINGTON & NBACH, P.A. Courthouse Co ns to 350 444 West venue West Pal 33401 (561) 7 Atto J. p ppellateLaw.com AppellateLaw.com Acc p...ekbt FLAppellateLaw.com + +By:/s/ Philip M. Burlington PHILIP M. BURLINGTON Florida Bar No. 285862 + +#### SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v. Rotl Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Kara B. Rockenbach, Esq. + +Angela M. Many, Esq. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +(561) 727-3600 + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Tina@linIcrocklaw.com + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Mark Nurik, Esq. + +LAW OFFICES OF MARC + +1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 333.01 + +(954) 745-5849 + +marc@nuriklaw.c + +Attorneys for S stein + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER + +& WEISS, P.A. + +250 S. Australian Ave., S,j 400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 0 + +(561) 659-8300 + +jgoldberger@a + +smahoney@a + +Attorneys for 1 f y Epstein + +wards, Esq. + +AFFE, WEISSING, + +S, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. + +Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 + +Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +954) 524-2820 + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +brad@pathtojustice.corn + +# alupreme Court of jitotiba + +WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2017 + +CASE NO.: SC15-2286 + +Lower Tribunal o(s).: + +4D14-2282; 502009CA040800 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN vs. J. EDWJ ET AL. + +Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) + +Petitioner shall show cause on or before May 18 decision Debrincat v. Fischer, 42 Fla. L. Weekly S1 controlling in this case and why the Court should jurisdiction in this case. Respondent may sere why this Court's eb. 9, 2017), is not to exercise or before May 29, 2017. + +A True Copy + +Test: + +icte2A. Tomasino C Clerk, Supreme CotIc o.p. + +![](_page_18_Picture_15.jpeg) + +( S" two + +Served: O + +WILLL \$ B. PAUL MORRIS PHILIP M. BURLINGTON MARC S. NURIK TONJA B HADDAD W. CHESTER JR. JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER + +### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. SC15-2286 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. + +Petitioner, + +J. et al., + +Respondents. + +### PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE + +The petitioner responds as follows to urt's order dated May 3, 2017: + +1. On May 3, 2017, this Court is rder directing the petitioner to show cause on or before May 18, 201 A 42 Fla. L. Weekly S141 (Fl 017), is not controlling in this case and why the Court should not deer t iVilyexercise jurisdiction in this case. A+s'Court's decision in Debrincat v. Fischer, + +2. In resNo the show cause order, the petitioner would show no cause why Debrinc t no controlling as to the basis for this Court's jurisdiction, and no cause why t ourt should not decline to exercise jurisdiction. + +Respectfully submitted, + +LAW OFFICES OF PAUL MORRIS, P.A. 9350 S. Dixie Highway Suite 1450 Miami, FL 33156 + +Florida Bar No. 193769 Tel. (305) 670-1441 Fax (305) 670-2202 paulappeal®gmail.com paul®paulmorrislaw.corn + +sl Paul Morris + +PAUL MORRIS + +Counsel for Petitioner + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that this response was emailed below this 18th day of May, 2017. O el on the list + +sl Paul Morris iS C) PAUL MORRIS + +### SERVICE LIST: + +Philip M. Burlington Burlington & Rockenbach, Courthouse Commons/Suit 444 West Railroad A West Palm Beach. FL 4 r 1 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cce55dae36e6672f090c839252b62b6ceeda488 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/EFTA02762429.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,943 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 21, + "chars": 24953, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.62, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_18_Picture_15.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 44\\ \nRESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND \nAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 338.8296813964844 + ], + [ + 525.2535400390625, + 338.8296813964844 + ], + [ + 525.2535400390625, + 427.7509460449219 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 427.7509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Fifth Affirmative Defense", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 634.23 + ], + [ + 255.9720458984375, + 634.23 + ], + [ + 255.9720458984375, + 652.3804168701172 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 652.3804168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sixth. Seventh. and Eighth Affirmative Defenses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 618.03 + ], + [ + 364.2177734375, + 618.03 + ], + [ + 364.2177734375, + 636.2504119873047 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 636.2504119873047 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ninth Affirmative Defense", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 233.84205627441406, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 233.84205627441406, + 378.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 378.63043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.7818908691406, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.7818908691406, + 88.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 88.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "alupreme Court of jitotiba", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.344, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 439.437255859375, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 439.437255859375, + 123.86395263671875 + ], + [ + 160.344, + 123.86395263671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 417.9960000000001, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 417.9960000000001, + 105.24200439453125 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 105.24200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 479.08056640625, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 479.08056640625, + 339.9919738769531 + ], + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 339.9919738769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 389.94696044921875, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 389.94696044921875, + 262.491455078125 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 262.491455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 171.68821716308594, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 171.68821716308594, + 419.25146484375 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 419.25146484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762429" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/_page_18_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/_page_18_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..002656bb6b0b95fa6cf9340aaf98fb4fc4eac661 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762429/_page_18_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:96a68a02fe8a1af4b7699606a3187c4990bb8318632694ad399cf21db14061d9 +size 10881 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bc0747a18ff379e221882fa5a9417c41d1fa53f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.md @@ -0,0 +1,1927 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. ,individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S OMNIBUS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/CO AINTIFF FOUR MO COMPEL + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff September 21, 2017, relating to 2 1 , 2012 Interrogatories (Net Damages), and (4) Feb Jeffrey c ( wards") four Motions to Compel served on s' April 15, 2011 Requests to Produce, (2) December (3) December 21, 2012 Request for Production (Punitive "Epstein") responds in opposition to 013 Requests for Admissions (Net Worth), and states: + +## INTRODUCTION + +ur generic motions must be denied because they are moot and contain only one um ence stating that he "moves for an Order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to provide a substantive response to [the discovery request]." The discovery requests and responses were served over four to six years ago. Epstein stipulated that his present net worth is more than \$100 million. Most importantly, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege, which was accepted by trial counsel and recognized by the predecessor trial judge at the hearing on + +September 16, 2013. The resulting Order rendered November 15, 2013, closes this issue and all that remains is what legal application any adverse inference may have for trial. + +Counsel notes that there is a "good-faith" certification to each of the Motions to Compel which may have been reached with predecessor counsel. Undersigned counsel only discussed the pending motions on November 22, 2017, to obtain agreement that this consolidatyd response could be filed on November 27, 2017, due to the Thanksgiving holiday. + +### THE DISCOVERY REOUESTS AT ISSUE OS, + +The discovery requests at issue seek: + +April 15. 2011 — Request for Production seeking en relating to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in pstein is alleged to have engaged. (Exhibit A.) + +December 21. 2012 — Interrogatories c au t for Production seeking punitive damages related financial docu Ex ibits B and C.) + +February 26, 2013 — Admissiona put pstein's status as a "billionaire." (Exhibit D.) + +Epstein has responded to t as follows: + +May 16 2011 — Epste nse to Request to Produce. (Exhibit E.) + +July 9. 2013 — Amended R pon (Exhibits nd G. Amended Responses to Net Worth Interrogatories and Request for Production (Punitive Damages). + +Mar f3 2013 — Epstein's Responses to ' Requests for Admissions. (E + +# RRIOR ORDER MOOTS NEW MOTIONS TO COMPEL + +On November 15, 2013, the Honorable David F. rendered an Order on Motion to Determine Status of Punitive Damage Discovery and Applicability of Adverse Inference. (Exhibit I.) + +### MEMORANDUM + +### I. ACCEPTED EPSTEIN'S INVOCATION OF, AND THE TRIAL COURT PREVIOUSLY RULED ON, THE FIFTH AMENDMENT RAISED AS TO FINANCIAL DISCOVERY + +Following extensive discovery requests, responses, motions and hearings, including an in camera inspection, Epstein amended his discovery answers, produced portions of his tax returns and stipulated that his present net worth is more than \$100 million. See July 9 mended Response to Interrogatory No. 14. (Exhibit F.) These disclos ed sufficient information for to enter into evidence in the unlikely eyEn unitive damages become at issue in this case. + +Significantly, at a hearing on September 16, t p) ,( 2arties discussed outstanding discovery in the context of request f S "SS, t inference. Epstein's counsel informed the C t Fifth Amendment issue remained as to ds' S od unsel stated, "I will accept Ms. Coleman's representation on the record that o discovery that has been withheld has been withheld solely on the basis of the Fi m dment privilege." (T. 21) (Exhibit J). Epstein's counsel clarified, "The discovery at issue is the net-worth discovery for the punitive damages." (T. 21). After er di ussion, accepted Epstein's position that the financial discovery w eld on the basis of the Fifth Amendment privilege. (T. 22). the pending discovery dispute and on discovery and/or an adverse + +er emanating from that hearing titled "Status of Punitive Damage Discovery and Applicability of Adverse Inference" expressly deferred ruling on M' request for an adverse inference jury instruction until trial and stated that, "upon specific analysis of the specific question and answers, including those propounded in discovery, the Court will + +determine whether an adverse instruction will, or will not, be given and the specific instruction, if any, that will be given." (Exhibit I)(emphasis added). + +Accordingly, any issue may have had related to Epstein's net worth and financial discovery responses was put to bed over four years ago and is now moot. fully heard and accepted Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege. was + +### II. THE MOTION TO COMPEL THE APRIL 15, 2011 PRODUCTION MUST BE DENIED. T FOR + +request itself is confusing because it is compo nclear which communications are sought. (Exhibits A and E.) Regardless, in go ith Epstein responded to what he viewed as two parts of the request. First, Epstein h cuments between himself or his agents and William Scherer. Second, Epstein a o to asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege in response to the request for docu i "any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entities which communi C ates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct pstein is alleged to have engaged." + +Epstein's assertion of Amendment is clearly justified not only as to the documents, but to the seeming ple task of identifying responsive documents which may constitute testimoni evidtEticd that would incriminate him. Moreover, these documents are not even relevant er rida Statute section 90.401 because they go solely to the merits of the lawsuits a by IM clients - not at issue in this action. Because of the lack of probative ue to the issues to be tried in this case, these must also be excluded under Florida Statutes section 90.403. + +# CONCLUSION + +Epstein respectfully requests that the Court deny one sentence Motions to Compel. The discovery related to financial net worth is moot because Epstein amended his responses, stipulating to a present net worth of more than \$100 million and any other related issue was rendered moot by the parties' argument, acceptance of the Fifth Amendment assertion, and trial court's Order. Likewise, the Motion to Compel related to April 2011 request for production must be denied because Epstein appropriately and timely raised his Fifth Amendment privilege as to any communications between him and any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity relating to any allegation of illegal activi + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to th Service List below on November 27, 2017, through the Court's e-fili Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). listed on the pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINK & RO r T H, PA 1555 Pal es Boulevard, Suite 301 West P Florida 33401 (56 6 ; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +ottJ. Link + +tt J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(glinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

█████ J. █████
█████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of █████ rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
█████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s): + +FILED +2011 APR 20 PM 3:17 +SHARON K. BUCK, CLERK +ALLY BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EP ██████████ + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ██████████ J. Edwards by and through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit Bradley J. ██████████ to inspect and copy each of the following documents\*: + +1. All documents\* constituting, reflecting, or relating to communications between Plaintiff or any agent of Plaintiff, on the one hand, and William Scherer, or any person associated with William Scherer in the practice of law, any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of April, 2011. + +( ) +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire. +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT +(PUNITIVE DAMAGES) + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350, hereby requests Production from JEFFREY EPSTEIN of the documents and things described below for the purpose of inspection, copying, photographing, testing or sampling and any other purposes permitted under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure at the office of the undersigned within thirty (30) days of service of this request. + +DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS: + +A. The term "documents" as used in this Request is defined as including, but not limited to, the original and any non-identical copy (which is different from the original because of notations on such copy or otherwise) of all correspondence, telegrams, teletype messages, contracts (including drafts, proposals and any and all exhibits thereto), draft minutes and addenda, memoranda (including inter and intra office memoranda), memoranda for file, pencil jottings, diary entries, desk calendar entries, reported recollections and other written form of + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAGr +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) +Page 2 of 12 + +notation of events or intentions, transcripts and recordings of conversations and telephone calls, books, records, photographs, reports, tabulations, charts, books of account, ledgers, invoices, financial statements, purchase orders, receipts, canceled checks and other documentary material not subject to attorney/client privilege, together with any documents thereto, or enclosures therewith. The term "document" shall include data stored, maintained or organized electronically or magnetically through computer equipment, translated, if necessary, by you into comprehensible form. + +The term "document" includes the complete file or files within which any items constituting a "document" are found, including all such files within your possession, custody or control wherever located, including any branch, local or main offices, and including not only the contents of such files but also the folder, jacket, envelope or other container in which the file is kept or stored. + +Each draft, final document, original, reproduction, and each signed and unsigned document and every additional copy of such document where such copy contains any commentary, note, notation or other change whatsoever that does not appear on the original or on the copy of the one document produced shall be deemed and considered to constitute a separate document. + +B. As used herein, the following words shall have the meanings indicated: + +- (i) "Plaintiffs" in addition to the Plaintiffs named in the full style of this action, shall include any attorney, officer, director, employee or agent of + +Plaintiffs or any other persons acting under Plaintiffs' control or supervision, or in concert or association with Plaintiffs. + +(ii) "Defendant", in addition to the Defendant named in the full style of this action, shall include any attorney, officer, director, employee or agent of the Defendant or any other persons acting under Defendant's control or supervision, or in concert or association with the Defendant. + +(iii) "You" shall include the person (as defined below) or party to whom this Request is addressed and additionally all of his/her/its agents, officers, directors, employees, and other persons acting or purporting to act on his/her/its behalf, and includes also, to the extent there is no actual privilege, his/her/its attorneys. + +(iv) "Person" means any natural individual in any capacity whatsoever or any entity or organization, including divisions, departments, and other units herein, and shall include, but not be limited to, public or private corporations, partnerships, joint ventures, voluntary or unincorporated associations, organizations, proprietorships, trusts, estates, governmental agencies, commissions, bureaus, or departments, and the agents, servants and employees of same. + +(v) "Concerning" includes referring to, responding to, relating to, connected with, regarding, discussing, analyzing, showing, describing, reflecting, employing and constituting: + +- (vi) "Evidencing" means having a tendency to show, prove, or disprove. +- (vii) "Communication" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquy, discussion or conversation, and also means any transfer of thoughts or ideas between persons by means of documents and includes any transfer of data from one location to another by electronic or similar means. +- (viii) "Including" shall mean including but not limited to. +- (ix) "The words "and" and "or" as used herein shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as required by the context to bring within the scope of this production request any answer that might be deemed outside its scope by another construction. +- (x) "Related to" or "relating to" shall mean directly or indirectly, refer to, reflect, describe, pertain to, arise out of or in connection with, or in any way legally, logically, or factually be connected with the matter discussed. + +C. This Request calls for production of all responsive documents in your possession, custody or control without regard to physical location of said document. + +Control means in your possession, custody or control or under your direction, and includes in the possession, custody or control of those under the direction of you and your employees, subordinates, counsel, accountant, consultant, expert, parent or affiliated corporation, and any person purporting to act on your behalf. + +[REDACTED] adv: Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAGr +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) +Page 5 of 12 + +D. All documents shall be originals unless otherwise indicated. If your original is a photocopy or other copy, then the photocopy shall be produced as the original. + +E. Unless another time period is specified, this Request is addressed to documents created in the past five years from the date of this Request, and ending on the date of compliance with this Request. + +F. If you possess no documents responsive to a paragraph in this Request, state this fact, specifying the paragraph concerned. + +G. If you object in part to any Request, produce the portion of the documents requested to which you do not object, and state your objections to the remainder. + +H. As required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5), if you (including your attorneys and agents) are withholding information otherwise discoverable under these rules by claiming that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial preparation material, you (including your attorneys and agents): + +(i) Shall make the claim expressly and shall describe the nature of the documents, communications, or things not produced or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing the information itself privileged or protected, will enable the party seeking discovery through this Request to assess the applicability of the privilege or protection. + +(ii) Provide a brief description of the document, including (a) the date of the document; (b) number of pages, attachments and appendices; (c) the names of its author, authors, preparers and an identification by employment and title of each + +Edwards adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAGr + +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) + +Page 6 of 12 + +such person; (d) the name of each person who has sent, shown, or blind carbon copies of the documents, or has had access to or custody of the documents, together with an identification of each such person, and (e) in the case of any document relating or referring to a meeting or conversation, an identification of such meeting or conversation. + +I. When appropriate, the singular form of a word should be interpreted in the plural as may be necessary to bring within the scope hereof any documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside the scope hereof. + +### CONTINUING REQUEST + +This is a continuing request for the production of documents to the extent allowed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(e). At such time as you become aware of the existence of any additional documents responsive to this Request so that your response was not complete when made, you are hereby requested to produce such documents promptly. + +### DESTROYED DOCUMENTS + +If any documents responsive to this Request were at one time in existence, but have been lost or destroyed, a list should be provided of the documents so lost or destroyed stating the following information for each such document: (a) the type of document; (b) the date on which it ceased to exist, (c) the circumstances of its loss or destruction; (d) the identity of all persons having knowledge; and (e) the identity of all persons having knowledge of its contents. + +### MANNER OF PRODUCTION + +Pursuant to Rule 1.350, you should produce the original documents in the form, order and manner in which they are maintained in your files or the files of other persons under your control. In this connection, and for purposes of illustration, documents are to be produced in the file folder and file cartons in which they have been maintained or stored, clipped, stapled or otherwise arranged in the same form and manner as they were found. In the alternative, you should segregate all documents according to the specifications of this Request, and should organize and label each group of documents with the appropriate specifications prior to production. If any document is responsive to more than one specification of this Request, it should be labeled to reflect each specification to which it is responsive. + +### REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION + +1. 1. Please produce all Financial Statements prepared for or submitted to any Lender or Investor for the past five (5) years by you personally or on your behalf or on behalf of any entity in which you hold a controlling interest. +2. 2. Please produce the W-2's and any other documents reflecting any income (including salary, bonuses, dividends, profit distributions, and any other form of income), including all gross and net revenue received by you directly or indirectly for the past five (5) years. +3. 3. All tax returns filed with any taxing entity during the past five (5) years by you or on your behalf, or on behalf of any entity in which you hold or held a controlling interest at the time of filing. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)000CMBAGr Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) Page 8 of 12 + +4. All bank statements or other financial statements which were prepared by or .received by You, or on your behalf or by or on behalf of any entity, in which you had an ownership interest of 10% or more at any time during the past five (5) years. \_ . + +•• cirf 5.. All financial statements which were prepared by Yon or on your behtdf, or by or on • • behalf of any entity in Which you held an ownership interest of 10% or more at any iiiheauring the: past five (5) years:. • ) + +The deeds and titles .to all real property owned by you cibeld on your behalf either directly or indirectly at any time during the past five (5) years,.. ..)-v, I + +7.; All passboolcs with respect 10 all stivingsaceounts, checking accounts and savings A.,\_ jaZ .1 and. ean association share accounts owned by your ocon which you hold a right or have &held a • .right to withdraw ftuads at any time duringlheipa.st .fiVe yeats. + +8. All passbooks with respecty. all savings accounts, checking accounts and savings • . . . loan association share accounts, owned by you in whole or is part jointly as CO-partner, or joint venture, in any business enterprise, or owned by an entity in' which you have or have had a \-? -7 controlling interest any time during the past 5 yeath. + +9. st bank ledger Sheeti in.your possession, or accessible by you on the X ON\_ j internetrwith.ieSpect to all bank accounts in which you have a right to withdraw funds. + +Di, " The most recent bank ledger sheets in your possession, or accessible by yoit on the intetnet, with respect to:all bank accounts owned by you solely, of jointly as co-partner, or joint venture, in any business enterprise, or owned by any entity in which you 'have a controlling interest. + +I • + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAGr +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) +Page 9 of 12 + +11. All checkbooks for all accounts on which you were authorized to withdraw funds for the past five (5) years. + +12. All corporate securities (stocks or bonds) owned by you, directly or indirectly. + +13. The latest available balance sheets and other financial statements with respect to any and all business enterprises of whatever nature in which you possess any ownership interest of 10% or more, whether as partner, joint venture, stockholder, or otherwise. + +14. Your accounts receivable ledger or other company records which sets forth the names and addresses of all persons or business enterprises that are indebted to you and the amounts and terms of such indebtedness. + +15. Copies of the partnership or corporate Income Tax Returns for any partnership or corporation in which you do possess or have possessed any ownership interest of 10% or more whether as partner, joint venture, stockholder or otherwise, for the last five (5) years. + +16. The title certificates, registration certificates, bills of sale, and other evidences of ownership possessed by you or held for your beneficial interest with respect to any of the following described property owned by you or held directly or indirectly for your beneficial interest: + +a. Motor vehicles of any type; + +b. Commercial, business or construction equipment of any type; and + +c. Boats, launches, cruisers, planes, or other vessels of any type. + +17. All records pertaining to the transfer of any money or property interests or financial interests made by you in the past 5 years: + +irk Epstein Case No.: 502009CA04080IDOCCCMBAGr Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) Page 10 of 12. + +18.. Any and all memoranda and/or bills evidencing the mniOunt and terms of all of your current debts and obligations. + +19. All records indicating any and all income and benefits received by you,from any and•all sources fort past5 years. + +20. Copies of any .rind all. brokerage account statements or sec ties "vned by. you individually, jointly with any person or. entity or as trustee, guardian or stodlan, for the past 5 years" including in such .records date of pnrobaSe and nmotutts.541)for such securities, :and :certificates of any such securities: < 4), ' ')) + +N""1 21. All records pertaining to the acquisitiop,transfer and sale of all securities by you •or on yolk behalf for the.past 5. years, such records .to;inOlude any and.nitinforniation relative to. gains or lasses realized from transactions ini/Nvinisuch securities. • + +... 22. All policies of insur?ee,-,which you or any entity controlled by you • is the owner 6rbeneficiary. r ( ) + +21 Copies of any.:and all trust agreements in which yOu are the senior or banefieiary \e'•7 together with suckdocuments necessary and sufficient to identify the nature and Current value of the mist res. irs-.% • + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAGr +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) +Page 11 of 12. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of December, 2012. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Primary E-mail: jsx@scarcylaw.com +Secondary E-mail(s): mep@scarcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA ACCERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAGr + +Request to produce to Jeffrey Epstein (Punitive Damages) + +Page 12 of 12 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; + +smahoney@agwpa.com + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire + +bje.efile@pathtojustice.com; + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & + +Lehrman, FL + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954) 524-2820 + +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fred Haddad, Esquire + +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; + +haddadfm@aol.com + +Fred Haddad, P.A. + +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +Phone: (954) 467-6767 + +Fax: (954) 467-3599 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire + +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com + +The L-S Law Firm + +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor + +Miami, FL 33131 + +Phone: (305)-503-5503 + +Fax: (305)-503-6801 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; + +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO COUNTERDEFENDANT + +Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net Worth Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, this 21AK day of December, 2012. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 21AK day of December, 2012. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Primary E-mail: jsx@searcylaw.com +Secondary E-mail(s): mep@searcylaw.com .... +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com; +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +bjc.efile@pathtojustice.com; +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dec@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire: +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com +The L-S Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305)-503-5503 +Fax: (305)-503-6801 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +**NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +1. What is your full name? + +2. How are you currently employed? + +3. State the amount of your current annual income from all sources for each of the past 3 years and describe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for each of the past 3y ears including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit sharing participations, [REDACTED] options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits and other prerequisites of your employment including the dollar amount or dollar value of each. + +4. If you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + +(a) The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800)CCONBAG + +- (b) The date•and cost of acquisition; +- (c) The current fair niarket value cif each such intere ) tor= • C ir + - N. • +- (d) The manner in which =ICI\* calculated. + +( 14/ + +/ + +5. . As to each income-tml return•filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 200p through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all reported income and the separate amounts derived from each source + +• + +- 6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest, state: + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +(a) The address, + +(b) The legal description of the property; + +(c) The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; + +(d) The date and price of acquisition; + +(e) Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; + +(f) Whether, when, and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; + +(g)- The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the properly hits been listed for sale since the time.of purchase; + +• + +- (h) The cost of any improvements made to the +- P. ce purchase; + +- (1) The nature of your intercestin tupYiroperty. + +ele7) • + +';' '(j)' The currenefaiimarket value of the prOperty and a 'description of the manner in which that value was (Calculated + +7.. List e.ach itpm and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property Iv which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$io;poecoi: which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, audits to each state: + +- (a) The date of acquisition; + +• + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +ase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXivIBAG + +- (b) The cost of acquisition; +- (c) The current estimated fair market value; " \\* (d) The manner in which thefair market-value was estimated. + +g cr, Y + +/ 14/ • + +• + +jr + +8. If any of the real orpArsonal.property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered ``by either a real estate mortgage, chattel Mortgage, or any other type of lien, • then for each item )cifinoperty, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date theSnetutabiance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document'icc1;.if so, a description of that document. - Y + +.'s + +• • • + +If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + +- (a) 'The name and address of the business; + +- (b) S)) The present book value and the present market value of yoUr-mterest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the busfnessy1 Y + +- (c) A description of the manner in Which Oe stated fair market value was calculated. ,, + +- + +• + +10. Identify all banksrokrectict,unon and savings and than accounts, in which you have an interest or right of withdravaitimdfor each account state: + +• + +Where the account is located; + +.(b) The highest and lowest balance in the account during the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories. + +11. Identify all other assets of a value in excess of \$10,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each state: + +(a) The date of acquisition; + +(b) The cost of acquisition; + +(c) The current estimated fair market value; + +(d) The means utilized to estimate the current fair market value. + +NOTA ACCURATED COPY + +IMINI ADV. EPSTEIN - Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXIVIBAG + +- 12. Identify all other liabilities of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and as to each state: + - (a) The date the liability arose; 4 + - (b) The amount of the liability at Inc + +r i • a r • 1 • + +\_ ADV. EPSTEIN • + +) Case No.: 562009CA040800XXXXMBAG • • + +13, As to any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + +- (a) the date of the calculation or estimate; + - (b) the name and address of the person or entity responsible for p'erfomung the work 0 + - (c) the mason for performing the Caleulation r esttmate; ,<<\ (d) the amount of net worth calculicesIN'e#dinated + +•N + +•••••N + +14: What is your present net worth f + +- 15. As to all tramfers•oranymmg of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 yekr1s, e: + +- (a) ta description of the transferred ptopetty; -pr.% V 40;Y •the reason for the transfer; + - • • + - (c) the value of the item(s) transferred at the tithe of transfer; + - (d) the date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); + +\r + +• + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800MOCCMBAG + +> (e) whether you received anything of value in exchange for the transferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and the dollar value of what you received; + +(f) the name and address of the recipient of each transferred ice \*\*•:•••• + +s • + +STATE OF + +• COUNTY OF + +• + +ei Street + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +.954.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J, ██████████, +Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED AMENDED +ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT ██████████ INTERROGATORIES** + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure*, hereby certifies that the original amended answers to Defendant's Interrogatories was served upon Defendant via electronic service this July 10, 2013. + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 +LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, PA +315 SE 7th Street +Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +954.467.1223 +954.337.3716 (facsimile) +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually. + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: [REDACTED] + +Defendants, + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO +NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. ("Epstein"), by and through his +undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure* +hereby files his amended responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] Edward's Net +Worth Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein: + +1. What is your full name? + +ANSWER: Jeffrey Edward Epstein + +2. How are you currently employed? + +ANSWER: Self-employed and Philanthropist. + +3. State the amount of your current annual income from all sources for each of the +past 3 years and describe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for +each of the past 3 years including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit sharing +participations, stock options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits and other +prerequisites of your employment including dollar amount or dollar value of each. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial +information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. +391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these +statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the +chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See +*Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses +to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +4. If you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + +1. a. The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; +2. b. The date and cost of acquisition; +3. c. The current fair market value of each such interest; +4. d. The manner in which such value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution: + +5. As to each income tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all reported income and the separate amounts derived from each source. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest: state: + +1. a. The address; +2. b. The legal description of the property; +3. c. The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; +4. d. The date and price of acquisition; + +- e. Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; +- f. Whether, when and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; +- g. The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; +- h. The cost of any improvements made to the property since purchase; +- i. The nature of your interest in the property; +- j. The current fair market value of the property and a description of the manner in which that value was calculated. + +Answer. Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +- 7. List each item and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property in which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$10,000 or which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, and as to each state: The date of acquisition; e cost of acquisition; The current estimated fair market value; + - d. The manner in which the fair market value was estimated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, + +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. If any of the real or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered by a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each property, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document and, if so, a description of that document. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +9. If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + +- a. The name and address of the business; +- b. The present book value and the present market value of your interest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the business; +- c. A description of the manner in which the fair market value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +10. Identify all banks, credit union and savings and loan accounts, in which you have an interest or right of withdrawal and for each account state: + +- a. Where the account is located; +- b. The highest and lowest balance in the account during the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. + +391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +11. Identify all other assets of a value in access of \$10,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. The date of acquisition; +- b. The cost of acquisition; +- c. The current estimated fair market value; +- d. The means utilized to estimate the current fair market value. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. Identify all other liabilities of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. The date the liability arise; +- b. The amount of the liability at inception; +- c. The terms of repayment or satisfaction; +- d. The current outstanding balance. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, + +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +13. As to any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + +1. a. The date of the calculation or estimate; +2. b. The name and address of the person or entity responsible for performing the work; +3. c. The reason for performing the calculation or estimate; +4. d. The amount of net worth calculated or estimated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +14. What is your present net worth? + +Answer: I have already indicated my willingness to stipulate to a net worth in excess of one hundred million dollars: + +15. As to all transfers of anything of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, state: + +1. a. A description of the transferred property; +2. b. The reason for the transfer; +3. c. The value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; +4. d. The date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); +5. e. Whether you received anything of value in exchange for the transferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and the dollar value of what you received; +6. f. The name and address of the recipient of each transferred item. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +ALL + +[THIS PORTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually. + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: [REDACTED] + +Defendants. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] FOR +PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT (PUNITIVE DAMAGES) + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1,350 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure*, hereby files this amended response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edward's Request for Production to Counter-Defendant (Punitive Damages), and answers as follows: + +1. Please produce all Financial Statements prepared for or submitted to any Lender or Investor for the past five (5) years by you personally or on your behalf or on behalf of any entity in which you hold a controlling interest. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate 'statements of fact' that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a 'link in the chain of evidence' that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings.. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +2. Please produce the W-2's and any other documents reflecting any income (including salary, bonuses, profit distributions, and any other form of income), including all gross and net revenue received by you directly or indirectly for the past five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher* + +v. *United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +1. 3. All tax returns filed with any taxing entity during the past five (5) years by you or on your behalf, or on behalf of any entity in which you hold or held a controlling interest at the time of filing. + +ANSWER: Copies of my personal Individual Income Tax Returns on Form 1040 for the years 2010 and 2011 were provided with our prior response. + +1. 4. All bank statements or other financial statements which were prepared by or received by you, or on your behalf or by or on behalf of any entity in which you had an ownership interest of 10% or more at any time during the past five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +1. 5. All financial statements which were prepared by you or on your behalf, or by or on behalf of any entity in which you held an ownership interest of 10% or more at any time during the past five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to + +questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6. The deeds and titles to all real property owned by you or held on your behalf either directly or indirectly at any time during the past five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate 'statements of fact' that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a 'link in the chain of evidence' that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +7. All passbooks with respect to savings accounts, checking accounts and savings and loan association share accounts owned by you or on which you hold a right or have a held a right to withdraw funds at any time during the past five years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate 'statements of fact' that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a 'link in the chain of evidence' that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. All passbooks with respect to all savings accounts, checking accounts and savings loan association share accounts, owned by you in whole or in part jointly as co-partner, or joint venture, in any business enterprise, or owned by an entity in which you have or have had a controlling interest at any time during the past 5 years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate 'statements of fact' that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a 'link in the chain of evidence' that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth + +and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +9. The most recent bank ledger sheets in your possession, or accessible by you on the internet, with respect to all bank accounts in which you have a right to withdraw funds. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +10. The most recent bank ledger sheets in your possession, or accessible by you on the internet, with respect to all bank accounts owned by you solely, or jointly as co-partner, or joint venture, in any business enterprise, or owned by any entity to which you have a controlling interest. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +11. All checkbooks for all accounts on which you were authorized to withdraw funds in the past five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth + +and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. All corporate securities (stocks or bonds) owned by you, directly or indirectly. + +ANSWER: This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +13. The latest available balance sheets and other financial statements with respect to any and all business enterprises of whatever nature in which you possess any ownership interest of 10% or more, whether as partner, joint venture, stockholder, or otherwise. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +14. Your accounts receivable ledger or other company records which sets forth the names and addresses of all persons or business enterprises that are indebted to you and the amounts and terms of such indebtedness. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +15. Copies of the partnership or corporate Income Tax Returns for any partnership or corporation in which you do possess or have possessed any ownership interest of 10% or more whether as partner, joint venture, stockholder or otherwise, for the last five (5) years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +16. The title certificates, registration certificates, bills of sale, and other evidences of ownership possessed by you or held for your beneficial interest with respect to any of the following described property owned by you or held directly or indirectly for your beneficial interest: + +- a. Motor vehicles of any type; +- b. Commercial, business or construction equipment of any type; and +- c. Boats, launches, cruisers, planes, or other vessels of any type. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +17. All records pertaining to the transfer of any money or property interests or financial interests made by you in the past 5 years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself" may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See* + +*Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +18. Any and all memoranda and/or bills evidencing the amount and terms of all of your current debts and obligations. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself [ ] implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +19. All records indicating any and all income and benefits received by you from any and all sources for the past 5 years. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +20. Copies of any and all brokerage account statements or securities owned by you individually, jointly with any person or entity or as trustee, guardian or custodian, for the past 5 years, including in such records date of purchase and amounts paid for such securities, and certificates of any such securities. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. See *Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to + +questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +21. All records pertaining to the acquisition, transfer and sale of all securities by you or on your behalf for the past 5 years, such records to include any and all information relative to gains or losses realized from transactions involving such securities. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +22. All policies of insurance in which you or any entity controlled by you is the owner or beneficiary. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +23. Copies of any and all trust agreements in which you are the settlor or beneficiary together with such documents necessary and sufficient to identify the nature and current value of the trust res. + +ANSWER: Objection. This Request for Production requires the identification of the existence of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). "[T]he act of production itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact" that are testimonial in nature. *United States v. Hubbell*, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in future criminal proceedings. *See* + +Hoffman v. United Slates, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to • imestions relating •to my financial history and condition without waiving.my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, as'guaranteed by the United States Constitution: + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correcticopy of the foregoing was seined upon all parties listed below, via Electronic Service, this July 9, 2013. + +> Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonjit Haddad Coleman,. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 LAW OFFICES OF HkDo4 A 315 SE 7111Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33361 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (fasiiimilc). Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +Electronic Service List + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola et al. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +JSX@SearcyLaw.com +MEP@Searcylaw.com + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA +250 Australian Ave. South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +jgoldberger@agwpa.com + +Marc Nurik, Esq. +1 East Broward Blvd. +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +marc@nuriklaw.com + +J. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman +425 N Andrews Avenue +Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. +1 Financial Plaza +Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Dec@FredHaddadLaw.com + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN; + +Plaintiff; + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN; individually, +and [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS, +individually. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: [REDACTED] + +Defendants: + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES TO +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure* hereby files his responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edward's Requests for Admissions to Jeffrey Epstein as follows: + +1. 1. Admitted. +2. 2. Admitted. +3. 3. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479; 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +4. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +5. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history + +and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +7. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +9. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 + +(1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +10. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +11. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to + +prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial information without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +13. I admit that I was sentenced by a State Court Judge to the Palm Beach County Jail for the charges to which I plead. + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon Jack Scarola, Esq., and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esq., via Electronic Service, this March 27, 2013; + +![]()LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, PA +315 SE 7th Street + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +954.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +# EXHIBIT I + +NOT A CERTIFICATE COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +**ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] EDWARDS' +MOTION TO DETERMINE STATUS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGE DISCOVERY. +AND APPLICABILITY OF ADVERSE INFERENCE** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Motion to Determine Status of Punitive Damage Discovery. The Court heard argument of counsel, has reviewed the submittals and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. At hearing, counsel for EDWARDS advised the Court that certain "net worth" discovery in regard to the punitive damage count against EPSTEIN had been objected to on the basis of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. All other objections to such discovery had been withdrawn. As such, [REDACTED] now seeks a ruling from the Court in regard to an adverse inference (presumption) jury instruction and evidence preclusion at the time of trial. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +To the extent that the issue of amount of punitive damages is submitted to the jury at the bifurcated trial of this matter, the Court rules as follows: + +1. The Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] request for jury instruction adverse inference instruction is deferred until the time of trial. At the time of trial, upon specific analysis of the specific question and answers, including those propounded in discovery, the Court will determine whether an adverse instruction will, or will not, be given and the + +2013 NOV 15 PM 3:47 PM +ARROW - 208X SLEEP +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +FILED + +(specific instruction, if any, that will be given) Counsel for the parties shall be prepared at trial to propose such jury instructions. + +2. The Motion to Preclude Evidence is also deferred until the time of trial. At the time of trial, this Court will determine whether certain testimony and/or documents will be precluded based upon non-compliance with this Court's Pretrial Order and/or a *Binger* analysis conducted by the Court at the time of trial. + +3. Nothing in this Order shall be construed in and of itself as precluding the use of any answers submitted by EPSTEIN during discovery at trial if they are otherwise admissible. + +DONE AND ORDERED this day of November, 2013 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: +See attached list. + +Copies furnished by e-mail. + +Edwards.adv. Epstein + +' Pug No.: 50290?c4oftosoaxxNxivt BAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +. Jack Scarota; Esquire jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@seareylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409. . • • Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 381, Attorneys for J. + +William•Chestar =, Esquire wcblaw@aol.corn; wcbcg®aol.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 • Phone: (561)-655-4777 ' Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Eps'tein + +:Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldbergen@agwpa.com; smahons.y@ag com Atterbury, Goldberger.& 250 Australian Avenue Southinit1;400 West Palm Beach, FL 33461' Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeft y Ep + +"Esquire staf .efle a piahl justice.com Farmer; eissing, Fisios & Lihrman, FL 425- thews Avenue, Suite 2 • \* Fort La erdale, FL 33301 Phone: ( 54)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 • • + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee®FredHaddadLaw.com; haddadfrn@aol.com Fred Haddad, P.A. • One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 54009CA040800XXXXMBAC r • . • + +.• + +Fort Laudgdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)-461-6767 .Fax: (954)-467-3599: Attorneys for Jeffrey Eptein + +Marc S. Nurils Esquire marc@nmildaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nuiik. Ohe E Broward Blvd., Suite.700 Fort Lauderdale, Ft 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 • Fax: (954)-745-3556' Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire ' , ..tenja@tonjahaddad.corm Debbie©Tonjahaddad.coin,efili Tonja Haddad, PA. 315 SE 7th Street, Stine 301 Fart Lauderdale, FL 33301 .Phone: (954)-467-1223 . Fax (954)-337-3716 . • Atiomeys for Jeffrey Epstein g@tonjahaddad.com + +• + +It + +t + +# EXHIBIT J + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +1 2 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009C4040800xxxxm84G + +4 + +5 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +6 + +7 -vs-Plaintiff, + +8 9 J. , individually, . , in a ly, + +10 + +11 Defendants. + +.‹ fik + +21 + +' "-C\ 22. Y --W .at3, + +x,z4t,- Reported By: Pamela Pittman Gunn, FPR 25 Notary public, state of Florida + +HEARING HELD THE HONORABLE D + +> Mop¢a tember 16, 2013 .m. - 4:05 p.m. + +205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +1 APPEARANCES: + +2 On behalf of the Plaintiff: Page 1 hrg091613epstein.txt + +3 TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQ. TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 4 315 SE 7th street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 5 Phone: 954.467.1223 tonja@tonjahadaddad.com 6 + +7 On behalf of the Defendant J. + +13 14 15 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & 10 west Palm Beach, FL 33409 11 jsx@searcylaw.com 12 20 4 H(S-4.% 16 17 18 19 22 Cot lr 21 23 24 25 — ( , 3 PROCEEDINGS + +8 JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. 9 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Phone: 561.686.6300 + +- - + +3 Hearing taken before Pamela Pittman Gunn, Court + +4 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of + +5 Florida at Large, in the above cause. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 something to me today that evidentially I hav, 15 never seen before. It was a supplemental 16 memorandum I received. hrg091613epstein.txt THE COURT: Okay, this is the Epstein versus Rothstein case. It's the plaintiff - excuse me, counter plaintiff's motion to determine entitlement to adverse inferences and also prohibit the induction of evidence. I read the response. I read the motion and response. Counsel just hand delivered + +17 MS. COLEMAN: Your Honor, Mr. Sara 18 filed it at 10:30 this morning. t had 19 a chance to review it. I was o on 20 another matter. I haven't it either. + +21 THE COURT: Let me q stion before 22 we begin so I get my a ive back again. I 23 entered an order's m im ago in this case and 24 I guess dealin some 7 of the privileged 25 objections recall that? + +C.,1) + +1 " fr, COLEMAN: yes. + +2 HE COURT: And I think i asked for some nd of privilege log. Is there anything I'm supposed be doing or is that on appeal? + +MR. sCAROLA: I believe there are outstanding privileges as you said, Your Honor, 7 that is still not yet determined. + +8 9 10 THE COURT: okay, because I didn't know that. I thought I was waiting for something from you guys. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: I don't think so. Page 3 + +12 THE COURT: I'm going to have to have a 13 status conference and figure everything because 14 I went back and looked at it and something's 15 wrong. Okay. Good enough. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: To put that in context, Your 17 Honor. + +18 THE COURT: what is that, 464,0e + +19 II. COLEMAN: I'm sorry? + +20 THE COURT: what did you say? + +ai l + +21 MS. COLEMAN: Nothing, Judge. I w 22 23 speaking -- I was just coming up t car of it. + +24 THE COURT: Go ahead. + +25 14 MR. SCAROLA: Your r recall that + +1 2 3 4 attemp !py, narrow valid privileged 5 a ertiog and distinguish them from invalid 6 pr ged assertions. That primarily means that while we have acknowledged that r. Epstein has a valid Fifth Amendment privilege because he does clearly remain in jeopardy with regard to the underlying criminal activity that resulted in both a state 12 prosecution and a Federal non-prosecution 13 agreement. there have been 4.( ltip S 464arprivileges asserted with regard ety of issues. And we have ov rse of these proceedings been + +14 we believe that other privileges were 15 invalid. And the practical implications of + +.1; + +hrg091613epstein.txt 16 making that distinction are that we cannot draw 17 an adverse inference from the assertion of, for 18 example, an attorney/client privilege. But we 19 are under the case law clearly permitted to 20 draw an adverse inference from the assertion 21 of the Fifth Amendment, the right to remain 22 silent. + +23 so we need to eliminate the invalid 24 assertion, assertions of privilege from o 25 perspective. Leave in place the valid + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 assertion of privilege, which its to draw an adverse from th ssertions of privilege. vour Honor e consideration some of those challe That's by question. today's mo way of \_, 44t ilbar JI It have ileged assertions. to vour Honor's anything to do with US + +8 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 Be ay's motion relates only to tho u stances where the only privilege s by Mr. Epstein is a Fifth Amendment lege, his right to remain silent pursuant the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the uS Constitution that have been repeatedly asserted by him throughout the discovery in this case and in response to request to production and in response to interrogatories. And dozens and dozens and dozens of times in response to questions posed during the course of his deposition. + +20 what we are seeking today, by way of what Page 5 + +hrg091613epstein.txt + +21 really is a motion in limine is, in fact, a 22 determination that where the only privilege 23 asserted by mr. Epstein is, the only valid 24 privilege asserted by Mr. Epstein, is a Fifth 25 Amendment privilege assertion. That we are + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 entitled to a jury instruction that will info ..40: the jury that the assertion of that privi allows them to draw an adverse inference is that had an answer been given, t answers would be unfavorable to Mr. Eps n. have not laid out the precise wor n 777666 t jury instruction and if that'ssce y at this point. But we for a th NO are sib` confirmation of asi rincipal. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The second this motion is that as to those ma 0 which Mr. Epstein has over the four years that, almost four years t .t tpis case has been prosecuted, co istently asserted a Fifth Amendment pri e. He is not going to be able to get up t ere during the course of trial and change is position and suddenly begin testifying about matters in which he has consistently refused to provide information in pretrial discovery. + +:;11' v + +21 So those are two parts. That's what we're 22 asking for. we don't want to be surprised by 23 Mr. Epstein coming and attempting to take the 24 witness stand and to give testimony that he has + +1 THE COURT: Is this matter set for trial? + +2 MR. SCAROLA: We are set for trial, yes, + +3 sir. we're getting to the point now where -- + +4 THE COURT: when is it set? + +5 Hs. COLEMAN: we're on calendar call, 6 Judge, October 18 for the trial commencing 7 October 28th. + +8 THE COURT: Yeah, that sounds right + +9 okay. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: Now the pri 11 that we have gotten to thi 12 Baxter (phonetics) case ch'XGe have cited in 13 support of our posi case that arose in 14 a context where a vidual took the witness 15 stand and asse s Fifth Amendment 16 privilege esence of the jury. sponse is that the + +17 A tention in the 18 counte ef ndant's response is we would be 19 re to call Mr. Epstein to the witness 20 He would be obliged to assert his Fifth 21 endment privilege in the presence of the jury before we would be entitled to any adverse implication instruction. That simply is wrong. And it's wrong because Rule 1.330(a) renders 25 that distinction meaningless. Rule 1.330(a) is + +1 the rule of civil procedure that talks about + +2 the use of depositions at trial. And it Page 7 + +3 provides expressly that at trial a deposition 4 may be used, in this case, against an opposing 5 party as though the witness were then present 6 and testified. + +7 So we already have the basis upon which to 8 draw the adverse inference. It isn't necessary 9 that either we or Mr. Epstein -- call 10 mr. Epstein to the witness stand and have him 11 repeat what he has already consistently sa. 12 and that is that he refuses to answer th e 13 questions. so the distinction that 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 attempt to draw that this is pro premature because he has not the stand in front of the jury tred moot by virtue of Florida Rule vi Procedure which requires that sition testimony be treated in the r as trial testimony would be. ically our position, your Honor. + +22 THaCOu,T. okay. yes. + +23 NS. COLEMAN: Good afternoon, 24 add 25 judge. To the issues with which Mr. scarola has ssed I would point out the following to + +10 + +the Court. First, this motion is premature at best for several reasons. First of which is 3 M. Epstein is now set for deposition by 4 counter plaintiff on October 21st and i presume 5 will be asked further questions to which he may 6 or may not assert the Fifth Amendment. So to + +hrg091613epstein.txt 7 preemptively presume that he will assert it or 8 not assert it and make a ruling based on an 9 adverse inference on something that hasn't yet 10 happened is inapplicable. + +11 Second, Judge, with respect to discovery 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 that has gone on in this case over the past four years there are many, many, many questions sadly which are not spelled out in the bulk this motion. Questions that have been pose Mr. Epstein that irrefutably have absolu nothing to do with this case. All that i evident from everything that has b led in this case, that the parties, t plaintiff, would like to r i e the cases that were being prosecu h against M. Epstein several . This is a simple abuse of •r nd malicious prosecution ca ge. so with respect to the negati erse inference to which LJ + +1 co laintiff may or may not be entitled, 2 ourt needs to conduct a far more detailed alysis into those questions and answers other than the blanket assertion made by this motion. + +Judge, for example, to be entitled to a negative inference, the party seeking it must 7 prove that the information cannot be benefited 8 or received from obtaining -- I'm sorry, let me 9 start that sentence over. The inference may 10 not be drawn unless there's a substantial need 11 for the information and there is not another Page 9 + +hrg091613epstein.txt + +12 less burdensome way of obtaining that 13 information. That's the first step. And I 14 appreciate this is not fully -- this is like I 15 received their memo this morning and I was 16 under the misguided conception we were arguing 17 the two cases he cited but I will lay this out 18 for the court anyway since we're here. The 19 Court has discretion -- + +20 MR. SCAROLA: I don't mean to interr 21 but that's all I have argued. I have no \_ 22 argued the supplemental memo at all + +23 ms. cOtEMAN: The rule to''`...'\* 24 referred is not cited in his fil th 25 respect to the use of the on. But what + +1 this court has S b AS\*/ ore it can determine -- + +2 THE C me ask a basic question. + +3 Ms.' : ves, you can. + +4 TH u, : There is bunch of cases where 5 so eone has waived Fifth Amendment and it + +6 , hap all the time in DUI cases and then in + +7 ,-- civi lawsuits. I've never had anybody ask me ' 8 i or an actual jury instruction like you do in a + +t 0 9 spoliation case. what they do is they ask the question, the person denies it or -- excuse me, + +they take the Fifth Amendment. And says + +12 weren't you drunk on the night of the accident, + +13 and they answer I refuse on the basis of 14 incrimination. Then they argue to the jury, he + +15 admitted it and -- + +hrg091613epstein.txt 16 ms. COLEMAN: That's exactly my point, 17 Judge. + +18 THE COURT: I've never seen a case where 19 it says you're entitled to an actual 20 instruction. In the cases you cited, the two 21 cases cited, at least I didn't see that in the 22 case you cited. Is there actually a case in 23 Florida where if you take the Fifth Amendmen 24 you're entitled to an adverse inference 25 instruction like a spoliation case whey + +16 17 In every case that I've read, state and Federal, indicates that it occurs at trial. We don't know what questions are going to be asked. we don't know what's going to happen. + +18 THE COURT: The jury can draw an adverse 19 inference since nobody is pleading the Fifth 20 Amendment and -- + +1 there's specific instruction a rvel y the 2 Fourth District? + +3 MS. COLEMAN: It's on, Judge, 4 but -- + +5 THE COURT: 'see anything like 6 that. + +7 MS. No, I didn't see anything 8 either my understanding is, as I 9 said, .a -tt4 cases to which counter plaintiff 10 re clearly states that the witness is 11 avai ble, he's coming. He's listed on both 12 tness lists. He's the defendant. He'll be here. He'll be testifying. + +21 MS. COLEMAN: Only if you base your 22 findings on a particular set of information 23 delineated. For example, should Mr. Epstein 24 I'm hypothetically speaking -- take the stand 25 and answer a question to which he's previously + +1 2 And then, and only then, would the issue o 3 negative inference become applicable. 4 point we respectfully feel the plai 5 the cart before the horse becau not at 6 trial. I don't think even M la can 7 determine what evidence i o o come out at 8 trial. I've never se a instruction 9 drafted before dis ry 5 even finished. 10 He's taken Mr. ein deposition. asserted the Fifth, you can strike that + +11 THE CO time I have ever done -- 12 sorry to t you. I've never given a 13 writs the context of the Fifth 14 ndme It's always been in the context of 15 di rY violations or failure to comply with 16 overt' requests or spoliation issues. And 17Ohen remember the name of the case. we drafted instructions under -- I can't + +MS. COLEMAN: It's Rule 1.380. + +0 THE COURT: Actually, a case where you 21 approve a specific, it's not a presumption, 22 it's an inference. You give the presumption 23 it's irrelevant, not to say stupid, something 24 like that. I'm not really sure what you want + +1 MR. SCAROLA: There are two things I want 2 you to rule, your Honor. I want you first to 3 rule that Mr. Epstein will not be permitted to 4 give testimony or to produce evidence that he, 5 himself, has withheld as a consequence of hi B ars, } 6 consistent assertion of the Fifth Amendment 7 privilege during the course of the four that this matter has been in pretrial - 9 discovery. He should not be perm fter 10 having refused to give that ev 11 pretrial discovery, to pres fi evidence at 12 trial. That's part one + +13 Part two, we sh entitled to an 14 instruction after ish Mr. Epstein's 15 deposition tes o the jury in which he 16 has refused C a er questions, that his 17 silence eld against him. + +18 19 20 21 ear that we are entitled to jury instructions that support our theory of the case. And it is a proper statement of the law, that a statement -- excuse me -- that an assertion of privilege 25 in the context of a civil case may be used by n't tell vour monor that I have at rill iolt ha 1 lorida case that approves a specific form f instruction. But the law is quite + +1 2 the jury to draw an adverse inference, inference against the person who refuses to Page 13 + +3 testify. + +4 Now the common experiences of jurors who 5 watch TV and read magazines and read books is 6 that you may not hold an individual's right to 7 remain silent against him. Because jurors are 8 generally educated about such matters in the 9 context of criminal proceedings. so to 10 disabuse jurors who may believe that it is fir' 11 improper to hold an assertion of Fifth 12 Amendment privilege against someone, we foul 13 be entitled to an instruction that what 14 the law is. + +15 And the law is that youlaa ed hold 16 the assertion of the righ 17 the context of a civil s 18 who is making that ert . 19 strong statemen n s port of that position 20 in the cases ave cited to your Honor. 21 Includin' ed states supreme Court that 22 has tal d tb t the probative value of an 23 as erxion of a right to remain silent in the 24 7 con of civil cases. in silent in ainst the person There are very + +25 So it is on that basis that we are asking + +17 + +the Court to do those two things. -tell us right now that since Mr. Epstein's refused to 3 give evidence pretrial, he's not going to be 4 permitted to recede from that. And secondly, S tell us that the jury will be informed of the 6 basic legal principle that the assertion of the + +hrg091613epstein.txt 7 right to remain silent in the context of a 8 civil case can be used against the person 9 asserting that right to remain silent. + +10 THE COURT: Okay, you get the last word. + +11 ms. COLEMAN: Thank you, Judge. I was 12 unable to address section two or part two of 13 Mr. scarola's motion in which he asks that we 14 be precluded at offering certain evidence at 15 trial. First, Judge, I would submit that w 16 had filed weeks ago our trial exhibit li 17 witness list. And if there's specific i 18 contained on our exhibit list in 19 Mr. Scarola takes issue, he sh g it up 20 at the proper time and obj , which 21 we're required to do pur your court 22 order. If there is listed on our 23 exhibit list that what he's asking Z4 for, that's th time to raise it. + +25 Furth udge, your order + +18 + +4) + +1 sp tally delineates, I believe in paragraph 2 l, H, at if we haven't provided it to opposing unsel, we can't use it. It's that simple. Obviously, if we tried to submit evidence that we have not provided to the plaintiff in this case, we wouldn't be permitted to use it. + +THE COURT: So there's a difference under 8 the Binger analysis. There's two different 9 things there. one I can -- certainly I don't 10 have to do Binger analysis and the sanction. 11 want to know what I haven't done, okay. + +12 Because I've evidentially missed something 13 along the way. Because I entered an order 14 basically saying I required you to file 15 privilege logs which identify each document, 16 what the privilege is to that document and so I 17 18 can look at them and determine which ones more I have to look at. I don't recall. Did I get 19 that? + +20 MS. COLEMAN: No, what happened, Judg 21 what we did we amended our answers to -- + +22 THE COURT: I must be losing m d. + +23 MS. COLEMAN: we amended ou to 24 all that discovery and only a s he Fifth 25 Amendment to those that w serting a + +19 + +1 privilege. So e w no other privilege 2 raised. + +3 THE hat am I supposed to be 4 ruling + +5 ',MS. COLEMAN: Right now? HiS motion. + +6 COURT: NO. No, I thought -- again, I'm sorry, guys I'm confused. I thought there as things out -- Mr. Scarola said there are things outstanding. + +MS. COLEMAN: But there's still our issue with the privilege log filed by Mr. 12 with respect to our discovery requests as well. + +13 THE COURT: I'm talking about with regard 14 to Mr. Epstein. Is there anything I need to 15 rule on with him? + +hrg091613epstein.txt + +16 MS. COLEMAN: No. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: That wasn't my understanding 18 but quite frankly, Your Honor, I didn't 19 specifically review that for purposes of 20 responding to that question. + +21 THE COURT: I'm sorry for interrupting 22 you. The only reason I did that is to prepare 23 for today's hearing. I looked at the file and 24 one of the last things I did was that order 25 entered on where I determined that I wil + +20 + +1 require you to file the detail r eged log 2 so I can determine based on ola's 3 argument on the Fifth t ou can't get 4 but the other stuff, , can be 5 sanctionable. t was kind of waiting 6 because I did ' anything. You're telling 7 me there i rivileged log out there or 8 there i t / need to rule on? + +9 NS. 0 MAN: No, your order said that you 10 ne be able to rule on the other 11 fth amendment privilege which we raised. 12 ery other privilege we raised has now been 13 withdrawn and all the discovery has been amended. Anywhere we asserted a privilege, we asserted the Fifth along with other privileges. 16 All the other privileges were taken out. So 17 it's only the Fifth Amendment. So there's 18 nothing to review. + +19 THE COURT: some of the case law I read in 20 Federal court says even the Fifth Amendment Page 17 + +21 sometimes the court can look at in-camera to 22 determine if it's -- + +23 MS. COLEMAN: If you would like us to 24 do -- + +25 THE COURT: NO, I never asked for + +1 2 3 4 5 in-camera inspection if I don't need to do I'm just asking what it is haven't done in regards to regard to Mr. Epstein. we're this. with I need to do the privileg just ing n + +6 (.7.) (8) C) to MR. SCAROLA: I will aC (representation on)the rec (discovery that) has bee Aigk,e ld has been 1430r (vithheld solelY)on b s of the Fifth 4. (Amendment privy Coleman's all of the + +11 12 THE CO e's been a privilege log filed orc ,po + +13 14 15 16 MS Lil N: No. Judge. The answer it's al met-worth discovery. (The discovery that) was ssue is the net-worth discovery for the) punitive (damages) + +17 THE COURT: This is probably unfair to you guys. I'm asking questions because it concerns me if there's something out there I'm supposed to be ruling on and I might have to do that. 21 Is there something pending on me that I'm 22 supposed to rule on? + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Not if the only privilege 24 that's being asserted is a Fifth Amendment + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 did talk about at the time of that last hearing was that some of the financial information that was requested was corporate financial information. And you correctly observed a corporation has no Fifth Amendment privilege., \_ -A rhetorical question. I don't know how So don't know -- Your Honor asks the yqo ca be asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege regard to the corporate records. \_ + +10 11 THE COURT: It has to be I even if it's an individual. I at. + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 221 representation. MR. SCAROLA: Cor those were the concerns that Your H my understanding back to the co something those m rs nrP C fdhe (counter defendant is that) pressed. And it was shifted the burden endant to provide Honor with regard to ut I will repeat, if the) ye ing(ttat has been withheld in discovery) has VI' en withheld on(the basis of the Fifth) , endment privilege, I'll accept that) + +THE COURT: I'm asking you. I don't want to get -- + +25 MS. COLEMAN: That is not what I said, + +1 Judge. + +2 THE COURT: Hang on. I'm going to set a Page 19 + +3 status conference. You guys can talk about 4 this. See what the status of discovery is at. 5 What I need you to do is I need that fairly 6 quickly. Probably next week or so you all are 7 coming up on trial here. And see what I need 8 9 10 to get done before you all walk into the courtroom. You said there's also stuff and are you waiting for me to rule on -- + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ms. COLEMAN: Judge, you were taking was quite a while back. That we had a with respect to the privileged log by Mr. first from (inaudibl from Farmer Jaffe. There is same s that were alleged by them to 6 n ntial, just communications, such ication with the press and the gover have not yet been ruled on. The ng as supposed to be continued. + +21 22 23 THE don't recall. I have nothing e, at least that x know, that ha t been ruled on. + +24 lt r COLEMAN: I'll 25 - Midge. refile the motion, + +641fr + +THE COURT: or reschedule it or whatever. I don't have any in-camera that I haven't done 3 so far. + +4 MS. COLEMAN: If you're not making a 5 ruling right now on this motion, we would like 6 to be afforded the opportunity to respond to + +11 -- he set this hearing on July 17th and it was hrg091613epstein.txt the thirteen-page memorandum that Barnhart, Scarola provided a couple of hours ago. THE COURT: How quickly can you respond? MS. COLEMAN: Judge, the hearing was set requiremen SCAROLA: I have no problem. S. COLEMAN: Five day. THE COURT: Next week. How about next Monday, next Tuesday? you what I want you to do to make it easy. Call my JA or have someone call my JA and get an address. You can e-mail, maybe emailing it ge. ng in 10 to me and the same to Mr. Scarola so I get it 11 on Tuesday. Can you do that? + +Page 21 + +12 MS. COLEMAN: yes. + +13 MR. SCAROLA: Will it be necessary for me 14 to resubmit what I hand delivered? + +15 THE COURT: No, I'll take what I got and 16 wait for her. okay, I'll get an order out as 17 soon as I receive a response. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much. + +19 20 and talk about what you need to do. I'm THE COURT: want you guys to sit dowq 21 to schedule a conference to see what ne tO 22 be done. I got an easy feeling tha ing 23 need to be done before this Otto Thank 24 you. + +25 (The hearing was conclj4d :05 p.m.) + +26 + +1 C E R A T E + +2 + +3 STATE OF FLORI 4 COUNTY O;::;" + +5 + +6 + +7 - /, IL:la Pittman Gunn, Court Reporter, State 8 f Ida at large, certify that I was authorized + 9 and did stenographically report the foregoing hearing, pages 1-25; proceedings were held on September 16, 2013 and that the transcript is a true 12 and complete record of my transcription. + +13 oated this 23rd day of October, 2013. + +14 + +hrg091613epstein.txt + +Pamela Pittman Gunn, court Reporter \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9619d0b80162d8810eec00b477a4ca2790ca4432 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450/EFTA02762450.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,4200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762450.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 100, + "chars": 127107, + "elapsed_seconds": 43.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S OMNIBUS RESPONSE \nIN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/CO AINTIFF \nFOUR MO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.276, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 376.60302734375 + ], + [ + 75.276, + 376.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 526.799 + ], + [ + 356.5689392089844, + 526.799 + ], + [ + 356.5689392089844, + 541.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 541.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE DISCOVERY REOUESTS AT ISSUE OS,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.72, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 458.1106872558594, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 458.1106872558594, + 251.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 251.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RRIOR ORDER MOOTS NEW MOTIONS TO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 493.92584228515625, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 493.92584228515625, + 596.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 596.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.84588623046875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.84588623046875, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. ACCEPTED EPSTEIN'S INVOCATION OF, AND THE \nTRIAL COURT PREVIOUSLY RULED ON, THE FIFTH AMENDMENT \nRAISED AS TO FINANCIAL DISCOVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 543.0891723632812, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 543.0891723632812, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE MOTION TO COMPEL THE APRIL 15, 2011 \nPRODUCTION MUST BE DENIED. \nT FOR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 238.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 238.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 652.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 652.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 406.9223937988281, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 406.9223937988281, + 251.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 251.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EP \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 341.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 170.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 296.82, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 522.0360000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 522.0360000000001, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 296.82, + 123.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT (PUNITIVE DAMAGES)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 371.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 524.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 396.576, + 524.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 396.576, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 538.6500000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONTINUING REQUEST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 371.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DESTROYED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.812, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 374.544, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 374.544, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 214.812, + 509.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MANNER OF PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.89999999999998, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 198.89999999999998, + 441.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 151.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.43199999999996, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 522.648, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 522.648, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 297.43199999999996, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO COUNTERDEFENDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 457.164, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 457.164, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 157.95 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.76, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 521.424, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 521.424, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 293.76, + 136.89000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 358.02 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.4, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 275.4, + 155.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 230.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 230.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 244.61999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED AMENDED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 514.692, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 514.692, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 294.03 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 285.92999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] FOR PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT (PUNITIVE DAMAGES)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 517.14, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 517.14, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 365.976, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 365.976, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 121.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.288, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.288, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 281.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] EDWARDS' MOTION TO DETERMINE STATUS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGE DISCOVERY. AND APPLICABILITY OF ADVERSE INFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 321.57000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 349.5440368652344, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 349.5440368652344, + 176.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 176.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT J", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.948, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 585.6299999999999 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 596.16 + ], + [ + 231.948, + 596.16 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 115 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762450" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5545ceff5285f4d7137479cccf903cb6747abdf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.md @@ -0,0 +1,1643 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +#### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN 'AMINE + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. . by a through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Oppositions to Jeffrey E st s Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, and as grounds therefor states as follows:\_ 7' + +#### Summary + +Jeffrey Epstein's `Epstein Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine makes a desperate, 32 page attempt to ch e the cts of this case in order to alter a' cam') burden of proof. Ep cl r purpose is to avoid the admission of evidence that he lacked probable cause t tl HL Underlying claims against . Prior to addressing and refuting Epstein's motion in tail, it is important that burden in proving his malicious prosecution claim is accurately defined. + +believe that has the burden to prove that there was no reasonable basis for Epstein to manufactured and fabricated the claims was pursuing on behalf of + +clients against Epstein and that purpose in creating false claims was to knowingly aid in the perpetration of a massive Ponzi scheme. Since Epstein has blocked relevant discovery through 5th Amendment privilege assertions into what he knew at the time he syed and since he has expressly chosen not to assert an advice of counsel thereby preserving his attorney-client privilege, must prove the cause element through circumstantial evidence. The most compellin defense the probable tial evidence as to what Epstein knew are the facts relating to what Epstein , pstem could not reasonably believe "manufactured"/"ginned up"/ "crafted" c ed" claims against Epstein if Epstein did what Mr. alleged he did. A 'It ,'Plaintiff burden of proof is properly described as follo?c , contends that the + +- I. Plaintiff starts by p of L.M., E.W. and Jane D procedures he follow complete absence o scheme. g th truth of the claims he brought on behalf priety of the discovery he pursued and the prosecution of those claims as well as the f any knowledge of or participation in the Ponzi purpose he P ntiff will prove the leaders!. had in +- 2. Then, to estab motive to target for extortionist the jo\* t osecution effort of the multiple civil claims ing prosecuted against E their attendant punitive damage exposure as well as the Crime Rights Act case challen it E stein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, as spearheaded by and exposes Epstein to lengthy ration for his extensive history of child molestations. +- 3. Having proven the truth of Epstein's serial child molestation, the Plaintiff meets his initial burden of establishing the absence ti aofprobable cause. Proof of ir,n's motive to file false claims against (to extort Mr. into abandoning or compromising e interests o is clients) while not necessary to establishing a prima facia case corroborates the absence of probable cause, the existence of malice, and the foundation for an award of punitive damages. + +1. 4. The burden then shifts to Epstein. Epstein must attempt to establish either that the claims he brought against Brad [REDACTED] were true or must establish that even though his claims were not true he, nevertheless, had a reasonable basis to believe the claims against [REDACTED] were true- that is, that Epstein reasonably believed the claims [REDACTED] was pursuing on behalf of LM, EW and Jane Doe against him were fabricated AND reasonably believed that [REDACTED] Edwards was prosecuting these fabricated claims as a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. He must prove both to escape liability, but obviously, he must do so without relying on evidence that he has withheld through his earlier privilege assertions. In addition, Epstein faces the further obstacles of: + 1. i. His complete failure to defend against [REDACTED] Motion for Summary Judgment; + 2. ii. The res judicata effect of his voluntary dismissal of the claims against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + 3. iii. The absolute bar of the litigation privilege to support any damage claim arising out of Edwards' litigation conduct in the child molestation cases; + 4. iv. The fact that if the molestation cases were not fabricated, Epstein could not have been damaged by a fraud perpetrated without his knowledge against third parties with whom he never had any relationship; + 5. v. His criminal guilty pleas; and + 6. vi. His payment of \$5.5 million in civil settlements on [REDACTED] Edwards's three cases alone, which are the cases Epstein claims were fabricated. + +In the context of this proper understanding of [REDACTED] burden of proof order, Plaintiff [REDACTED] submits the following response to Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +**A. Epstein Has Repeatedly Made Clear That He Alleged That [REDACTED] Cases Were "Manufactured" / "Ginned Up" / "Crafted" / "Fabricated"** + +The foundation upon which Defendant Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine is built begins with the following claims: + +1. 1. "This case is not, and has never been, about whether or not the claims filed in 2008 against Epstein by [REDACTED] clients are true." Mot. in Limine at p. 2. + +2. Epstein never alleged "that did anything improper in regard to the conduct of this limitation until after joined RRA. Id. (emphasis in original). + +These assertions are demonstrably false and are simply another attempt ` b Epstein to retroactively change the allegations in his December 7, 2009 Initial Complaint sworn testimony that Epstein gave in his March 17, 2010 deposition. es the record citations contained in his Supplement to Motion in Limine Add ing pe of Admissible Evidence (a copy of which is attached as an Appendix to this or purposes of convenient reference), which lays out in detail that the overridin V eof Epstein's claims against was that had "manufactured" 1 4h behalf of his clients, which had "minimal to no value" and were instead g by for the "sole purpose" of knowingly funding Rothstein's Ponzi S S e, e.g..M 1 Supp. Mot. in Limine at p. 2. To now claim that this case "is n ii... t; h never been, about whether or not" a clients' claims were true is therefore be cl b ) the allegations contained in Epstein's Initial Complaint. + +Moreover, if Epst not alleged that the cases being pursued against him by were fabricated, ein would have no claim against based only upon Epstein's allegation Qf ' participation in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme for at least two reasons. First, ion conduct is absolutely privileged under Florida law. See, e.g., Echevarria, kfcCalla, Raymer, & Frappier v. M, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Second, Epstein was not a victim of the Ponzi scheme and therefore he suffered no legally cognizable damage as a result of Rothstein's misconduct. Epstein therefore had to, and in fact did, allege that the lawsuits being pursued by were fabricated. Epstein even sued one of his victims, L.M., and in the Initial + +Complaint he explicitly stated that the sexual contact he engaged in with L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe was "knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual." Initial Complaint at I 49. + +Furthermore, although Epstein now alleges that his claims only relate to wo performed by while an attorney at RRA beginning in April 2009, that is simply wards filed the victims' cases in 2008, before he joined RRA. pled fo \$50,000,000 when he filed the initial lawsuits in 2008, before he j began serving discovery related to the \$15 million bond issuance ory h 23, 2009, before he joined RRA.' Yet all of these litigation actions by a w h ed his time at RRA, are cited by Epstein as "evidence" that was an activ i t in the Ponzi scheme that Rothstein began in 2005 (when was still at omey's Office). Thus, although Epstein would like to replead his allegations to wards' six (6) month tenure at RRA, that has never been what this case is abou + +## B. Epstein Misunderstant thjJDifference Between Direct and Circumstantial Evidence + +Epstein's R 'sod djnnibus Motion in Limine also builds its foundation on the following demonstrably < as 'on, references to which are replete throughout the motion: + +to Epstein, the third support on which he rests his defense is that no evidence, either direct or circumstantial, regarding whether Epstein had + +attached hereto as Exhibit '1'. As the Court will recall, Epstein mak.nucigMubsequent bond motion filed in I A copy of the First Request for Admissions served on Epstein by in the Jane Doe federal case is July as evidence that was "pumping" his clients' "manufactured" claims to further the Rothstein was takiniacovery on the bond issue in March on behalf of Ponzi scheme. Yet as this March 2 009 pleading shows, of 2009, before he started at RRA. The pleading is clearly and Associates, LLC. + +"probable cause" to file the underlying claims in this action, or whether he acted with "malice."See, e.g., Mot. in Limine at p. 1 ("In recent deposition testimony, 1M admitted that he has no evidence of Epstein's intent ...'). + +Epstein is correct that apart from Epstein's obvious knowledge of o riminal conduct, noes not have direct evidence as to what was in Epste t the time he filed this malicious lawsuit (because Epstein has repeatedly hidden b attorney-client privileges). However, Amendment and has, and inteuVut forward, an abundance of circumstantial evidence as to both probable cause and m e , .g., Dep. Tr. at pages 272-76. Specifically, that Epstein committed all t 4 and therefore Epstein could not have had Zrause to initiate this lawsuit, and in fact Epstein's motive was to instead extorts 7 And it is that very circumstantial evidence that Epstein's Revised Omnibus Moti e improperly asks this Court to exclude. rimes that he was being accused of, + +## C. Epstein's Remaining g Blocks Crumble Under the Weight of the Law and the Uncontested ecord acts + +After chan g the derlying facts to suit his desired narrative and making the obviously incorrect ass th Epstei next 30-odd pages attempting to keep out any and all circumstantial evidence that Edwar s is clearly entitled to introduce to meet his burden of proof. Specifically, Epstein continues building his house on the following blocks: has "no evidence" to prove either probable cause or malice, + +3. The discovery pursued by was not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence and therefore, supports the conclusion that was a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. + +4. Evidence of other claims against Epstein and the criminal charges against him are irrelevant to any pending issue. + +5. Exhibits listed by are inadmissible hearsay. + +had no legiti e and therefore supports the conclusion that was a knowing t in the Ponzi scheme. 6. The federal lawsuit filed by + +7. cannot rely on any adverse inference n Epstein's 5'h Amendment assertions. + +Every one of those blocks crumbles under of any reasonable application of the law to the uncontested record evidence. + +- i. The discovery pursued adlejTEdwards was reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence n absence of a direct link to the conduct alleged by three an4flt4 i11 S ents. + +Setting aside the fact Itein suffered no cognizable legal damage as a result of the discovery pursued by Ed due to the litigation privilege), all discovery pursued by on beh his clients was appropriate given: (1) the pending Punitive Damage claim against A.7. Ep t Florida Statutes § 90.404(2)(a), which permits similar fact evidence of other wrongs, acts to be introduced into evidence to prove a material fact at issue (such as motive); (3) the 18 USC 2255 Federal claims requiring a federal interstate nexus; and (4) Federal Rule of Evidence 415, which makes evidence of prior sexual molestations admissible. + +Defendant Epstein conveniently ignores all four factors listed above. As an example, on page 4 of his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, Epstein claims that the following questions posed to Epstein at his 2009 deposition were "outrageous and irrelevant": + +Q (by a "Mr. Epstein, did you ever care about any of the feels o e minor girls that you were engaging in sex with?" + +Q (by ': "Isn't it true that at the time you were inserti gers into the vagina of these little kids, all you cared about w .wn sexual gratification?" + +These questions are clearly relevant to the victims' punitivo,damage claims. Additionally, as was actively seeking to overturn Eps and was a lead attorney quarterbacking the civil lawsuits being prosecut e\ a Epstein, evidence and testimony related to Epstein's potential criminal and civiTli bi ity as a result of his actions is clearly relevant to establish his motive in filj cause and malice). al Complaint (which goes to both probable + +#### ii The Exhi that pstein Challenges are Not Hearsay When They Are Not Being Offered to the Truth of the Matters Asserted. + +Exhibits law enforcement investigative reports, witness statements, depositions in other casesta raft flight logs, are not inadmissible hearsay2 because they are not offered to + +a Somewhat ironically, Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine attempts to demonstrate Epstein's probable cause to initiate this lawsuit by relying on a variety of media articles and unswom pleadings, all of which are inadmissible hearsay unless offered for the sole purpose of proving a basis for Epstein's state of mind - a reasonable belief of i guilt even if he was actually innocent. Unfortunately for Epstein, no such conclusion can be drawn from the sources he cites, because none of the sources purportedly relied upon . b E stein name IFFI as a coconspirator in the Ponzi scheme that Rothstein ran from 2005 to 2009. And was only at or six (6) months in 2009, after the Ponzi scheme had been running for years. (at least, actor ing to the hearsay Epstein purports to have relied upon in filing this claim). Tellingly, Epstein did not name Rosenfeldt or Adler, the other named partners at RRA, or former Circuit Court Judge William Berger, active RRA co-counsel in the Epstein cases who is actually mentioned in one of the articles, as defendants in t is ma icious lawsuit. Only M, the attorney who was + +prove the truth of the matters asserted. Rather they are evidence of what relied on to form the reasonable basis for his pursuit of discovery calculated to lead to admissible evidence. That is, these exhibits establish the foundation for state of mind in !eying, for example, that specific individuals were passengers on Epstein's private pl her with minors who were transported interstate for purposes of sexual abuse and n. Certainly, Epstein cannot claim that "sought inflammatory discov as not relevant to clients' allegations against Epstein," Mot. in Limin cta , and then object to the very exhibits that establish why the discovery was being p add Exhibit related to Epstein's criminal conviction an d sex offender status is admissible to establish Epstein's motive to file this malici ts I t against to avoid imprisonment by intimidating any other victims from 4c)....e ng frifward. e first place. Moreover, the + +- iii. The 234-page fede ' filed by hada well -justified purpose pursuant to the rms a conditions o Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and the timing of its n as dictated by an expiring statute of limitation. + +Epstein makes m he fact that filed a second, federal lawsuit on behalf of L.M. in the su 2009. See, e.g., Mot. in Limine at p. 2 (referring to the L.M.'s federal action as a "dupl it"). According to Epstein, this lawsuit was filed for the "sole purpose" of furthenn t e onzi scheme. As explained in painstaking detail in his November 10, 2017 deposition, however, the real purpose behind the L.M. federal lawsuit was two-fold: (1) to take advantage of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, which prevented Epstein from contesting liability for any civil action brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255, and (2) to prevent the statute of + +actively pursuing multi-million dollar civil actions and the federal action to invalidate the NPA was targeted by Epstein. + +limitations from running on L.M.'s claims.3 And as testified, the state and federal L.M. lawsuits sought entirely different relief. + +Specifically, filed the 2009 federal action because Epstein had co mined 156 separate acts of sexual assault against L.M. while she was still a minor. It was ' position that, under Epstein's NPA, L.M. was entitled to compensation for each se ult. legal theory was that the NPA could not possibly only require Epst a statutory penalty for the first sexual assault, and then allow Epstein to commit t 155 sexual assaults for free. Obviously, will be able to establish to the mem ry that Epstein in fact sexually assaulted L.M. 156 times, so Epstein could not based his probable cause on this lawsuit. But given that Epstein has challeng y of this lawsuit and contended that it was filed for the "sole purpose" of pumpin nzi heme, must be permitted to establish that he had a well-justified purpo g this relief: to avoid the statute of limitations and to take advantage of Epstein's N details of which Epstein was fully aware of when he filed the malicious Initial Com gainst + +Finally, 'n's argument that the scrivener's error regarding the filing of the action under "Es t, red herring because the case was quickly consolidated with the other federal actions rn against Epstein, and he actively defended the case without being formally served. That consolidation also undermines Epstein's Assertion that he was damaged by the need to incur attorney's fees in responding to federal action, because regardless of the filing of the + +3 A copy of the relevant portions of deposition transcript is attached hereto as Exhibit '2'. [page 317-324]. + +federal claim on behalf of L.M., the discovery was being pursued simultaneously by other attorneys with other cases, the legitimacy of which has never been and could not be cancelled. + +iv. is Entitled to an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction on stein's 9 Amendment Assertions. + +Every authority relied upon by Epstein to challenge the ability to draw erse inferences from Epstein's assertions of his Fifth Amendment right to remain sil ssly qualifies the limitation advanced by Epstein — it applies only when the assertion o e ifth Amendment right is the stele basis supporting the inference.Wor example, E , and agrees, that the Fourth District Court of Appeal permits an adv e instruction when a defendant "refuse[s] to testify in response to probative evi end against them ..." See Mot. in Limine at p. 17 (citing Fraser v. Sec. & kw. Co , 5 So. 2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). An appropriate jury instruction addressi fifth amendment assertions in t op ion on drawing adverse inferences from Epstein's + +Here, there is ab ut dant oivan overwhelming evidence to support the inferences sought to be drawn. Three obv\* ex pies should suffice: Epstein pled guilty to two felonies related to the sexual mole oD children and voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal gove en confessing his serial molestation. In addition, when called upon to support his claims aga t in response to Motion for Summary Judgment, he + +also cites to the Coquina Investments v. Rothstein case for the incorrect proposition that use Epstein's Sth Amendment assertion as circumstantial evidence related to probable cause and malice. ee ot. in Limine at p. 20. Yet Coquina concerned whether an adverse inference could be drawn against TD Bank when it was the bank's employee, Mr. Spinosa, asserted the 56 Amendment privilege. The Court in that case held that Spinosa's Sn' Amendment assertions were not a proper basis for finding defendant TD Bank liable. Here, however, Epstein is both the asserter of the privilege and the defendant against whom the adverse inference is sought to be applied. + +completely failed to produce any evidence to support his claims and dismissed all of his false and malicious assertions. Finally, after full public disclosure of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and after his malicious attempt to extort [REDACTED] failed, Epstein paid \$5.5 million to settle the three cases he alleged that [REDACTED] had fabricated and were worthless. + +**Conclusion** + +For the foregoing reasons, every element of Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine + +Page 14 of 14 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +![](_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg) + +CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRAMOHNSON + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant + +## PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO C 0 EkDANT + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, by and through her undersigned counsel, and files this her First Request for Admissions to the Defendant; JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests said Defendant admit or deny the following facts ?,41Sn4ccordance , with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: + +#### DEFINITIONS + +The term "you" meanslprefers to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +# O ADMISSIONS + +- 1. Y'o'ur net worth is greater than \$10 million. +- 2. Your net worth is greater than \$50 million. +- 3. Your net worth is greater than \$100 million. +- 4. Your net worth is greater than \$500 million. + +![](_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg) + +5. Your net worth is greater than \$1 billion. + +6. Since being incarcerated you have, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons), conveyed money or assets in an attempt to insulate or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits filed against you. + +7. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in the Caribbean. + +8. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property inn foreign countries. + +9. In the last 2 years you have transferred assets and/or mon financial instruments to countries outside the United States. + +10. You have provided financial support to the modeli -icy MC2. + +11. You committed sexual assault against Plainti + +12. You committed battery against Plainti + +13. You digitally penetrated Plaintiff(w enStyr s as a minor. + +14. You offered Plaintiff more contingent upon her having sex with you or giving you oral sex. + +15. You intended to tiff when you committed these sexual acts against her. + +16. You knew Pla as under the age of 16 when you sexually touched and fondled her. ?S' + +17. O int d to hire investigators to intimidate and harass Plaintiff during this c n litigation. + +18. You were engaged in the act of trafficking minors across state or country borders for the purposes of sex or prostitution between 2000 and the present. + +19. You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitute and remaining in prostitution. + +- 20. You are guilty of the following offenses against Jane Doe: + - A. Procuring a minor for the purpose of prostitution as defined in F.S. 796.03 + - B. Battery as defined by Florida Statutes + - C. Sexual Battery +- 21. You are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts. +- 22. You are making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgmeawhattight be entered against you in this or similar cases. +- 23. You currently have the ability to post a bond of \$15 mill\* to satiSfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SEAIVP < C + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true an opy of the above and foregoing has I been provided via United States mail to the f4t1 wing addressees, this day of March, 2009. + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike. Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & C rtyin, LLP 515 North Flagler Driv Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 rcritaiThciclaw.iorn mpikerabc1clawscom + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 jagescabellsouth.net + +Michael R. Tein, Esquire +██████ Tein, P.L. +3059 Grand Avenue +Suite 340 +Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 +[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com) + +Respectfully Submitted, + +THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD ██████ & +ASSOCIATES, LLC + +By: + +![]()Brad ██████, Esquire +Attorney for Plaintiff +Florida Bar No. 542075 +2028 ██████ Street +Suite 202 +Hollywood, Florida 33020 +Telephone: 954-414-8033 +Facsimile: 954-924-1530 +E-Mail: [be@bradedwardslaw.com](mailto:be@bradedwardslaw.com) + +Paul G. Cassell +Attorney for Plaintiff +Pro Hac Vice +332 S. 1400 E. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Telephone: 801-585-5202 +Facsimile: 801-585-6833 +E-Mail: [cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +I; + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; S individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLgley + +VIDEO";es5S4 ITION + +Ag979.11Y + +C e)n Taken on Behalf of Plaintiff + +'t ta + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reportinilrvice, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ;2: (561) 471-2995 + +non-prosecution agreement with the federal government, • there was a provision within that agreement that Said 3 that if one of his oscura brought a case against him I exclusively under 18 USC 2255, then only under tnat 5 circumstance of bringing that case exclusively under a that count would Jeffrey Epste:n not contest liability • and agree to a minimum statutory damage amount Of • 5150,000. He later contested and said that an earlier application of the statute applied and It should only ;') be \$50.000. + +But nOnethele\$S, that was the general principle. That Statute did not allow for punitive damages. AM as f just explained, we assessed the :4 punitive damages as being extraordinary in cm case. + +So that's rite answer to that Question in .6 tarn, of the difference of the damages that we were Claiming in the state action, which contained a to 5 2i 22 claim for punitive damages and proceeded under common law theories of battery or intentional affliction, emotional distress. Those kinds of things in the federal claim was co proceed under 16 USC 2255. + +23 24 25 What happened in the summer of 2009 was that it was realized -- like I said, not by me -- it was initiallyrealized by Mr. Cassell. but : agreed. + +32 22 24 25 A Well. the statute of limitations in any sense s 5 only have so long from the time that the tort or the crime la °smutted to bring a claim, Otivarwl\$0 it's waived forever. So whet we did rot want to do is fail to bring the claim under 2255 and that claim expire at her 21st birthday, and it ultimately be a more beneficial claim to have brought and us not have the ability to bring it any more. Because it was also around that same time that we began to believe that -- there was an argument -- and perhaps the right atument -- the argument that 1 still believe + +that L.M.'s case was proceeding only in a and chat we had not taken advantage a provision in the non-prosecution a would allow for statutory dams s lhde 2255, and that L.M.'s birthday -- 21 believe -- was coming up in Augu that tho statute of limitations run -- or begin to run at that birthday for bra trig he 2255 claims. + +Q Exp n to the es and gentlemen of the jury, if wow lease, what the statute of hole app ed under the circumstance meant. Why' IL:cameo: the statute of 1 'air + +1 a 0 10 A If that determination was made in federal court, she would not have been shielded in state court, but we could have dismissed the state court claim and only proceeded under the federal case. The: we would be presenting a case in front of the jury were all of the -- lot's call it dirt that Jeffrey Epstein had dug up about L.M. would not be -- would not all have to cone into evidence, and we could save her sate of the problems that we assessed as being problems with her case. + +i2 li :4 Q You spoke about the statute of limitatio,., and L.M. turning 21. What is the statute of limitations that applies in a federal 18 1.M 2255 Cairn? + +15 16 it 19 14 20 21 A From recollection, there were two readings Of the statute. I haven't seen the statute in a long time -- at least in a while -- but it's -- it uses sons language that it's three years from the date that the disability no longer exists, which we interpret as her being a minor. So I think it's three years from the time that she's no longer a manor. + +22 21 24 So at the tuns she turned 21. there was an argument that her 2255 claims, if we Chose to proceed under them, would have expired. + +25 Q Did the timing of the filing of i + +to this day prObably we would win on, but it never got tested -- was that while Jaffrey Epstein. under 2255, would have to agree -- if you exclusively sum a him under that -- would have to agree to met:: to i liability and to statutory minimum damages of 2 150.000. It was his position that that would be the mxinum regardless of the number of tines that he t molested that particular person. 5 In L.M.'s circumstance. she had been 10 Molested by him for years and dozens and dozens and it dozens of tines. I don't know how man tires. :: maybe 100 times while a minor. So we tatted to IN think, you know what, if you set of these 14 cases for \$150,000, it's g ndetv uing this 15 case. If he has to admi lity and you can la nult:ply 150.000 tuna- e of offenses that 15 he committed, it tim from having to is endure catenate discov y and intimidation that :9 they -- especial -- was having CO endure. 20 And if hat argument, then that'S definite:), 5, thepe try this case, especially for L.X. that difference? Why would L.N. be rote abase co which she was subjected in the proceeding :f the doter:Wien= was made proceed in federal court under USG 2255? + +1 federal action have anything to do with any factor, + 2 other than those that you have just described, the + 3 potential expiration of the statute of limitations + 4 and your desire to take advantage of the provisions + 5 of the non-prosecution agreement as a potential + 6 alternative to the state court claim? + +7 A That is the only reason that we filed it at + 8 that time. + +9 Q Did Scott Rothstein have any role + 10 whatsoever in that decision-making process? + +11 A He never had any role in any decision-making + 12 process with anything to do with any of these cases, so + 13 no. + +14 Q Did you become aware of the fact that your + 15 Epstein-related files at some point in time had been + 16 requested by Scott Rothstein? + +17 A Yes. + +18 Q How did you become aware of that? + +19 A I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +20 Q Was there any explanation offered as to why + 21 Scott Rothstein wanted to see the Epstein-related + 22 files? + +23 A That if these cases went to trial, he wanted + 24 to try the cases with me. + +25 Q He who? + +1 A He, Scott Rothstein, wanted to try the case + 2 with me. That's the explanation that I was given. + +3 Q And was there anything suspicious about the + 4 head partner in the firm telling you that in this + 5 high-profile case he wanted to be part of the + 6 prosecution team? + +7 A No. If my associate brought in a + 8 high-profile case right now, I would be the one to try + 9 the case, despite the fact that she may be the only one + 10 who knows anything about it. So there's nothing + 11 suspicious about that. + +12 Q Files got returned to you? + +13 A Yes, files did get returned to me. + +14 Q And -- was there anything about the request + 15 for review of the files on the basis that Scott + 16 Rothstein was considering participating in the + 17 prosecution of those claims that aroused any + 18 suspicion on your part? + +19 A No. + +20 Q Was there anything else that went on in the + 21 short period of time that you were in that law firm + 22 that gave any cause for you to suspect that your + 23 files were being used in any way, directly or + 24 indirectly, in connection with any illegal activity + 25 of any kind? + +1 A No. I was just a lawyer just working my case + 2 and trying to prove my case. That's it. I wasn't + 3 concerned with whatever other signals or signs there + 4 were. But there weren't any. The most suspicious + 5 thing was, there were police officers walking the + 6 hallway. But police officers in the building didn't + 7 give me that type of suspicion. It was an unnecessary + 8 degree of security over the law firm, at best. But + 9 with these files or any of the files, no suspicion + 10 whatsoever. + +11 Q Who were your coworkers in that law firm? + 12 Who were the other lawyers that you were working + 13 with? + +14 A Just generally who was in the law firm? + +15 Q Yeah. Give us a general description of the + 16 quality of the people that were working for + 17 Rothstein, ██████████ field & Adler during the period of + 18 time that you became associated with the firm. + +19 A Well, while I was at the firm, I worked with + 20 Bill Berger, who had just come off the bench. He was a + 21 judge. + +22 Q There's been a number of references to Bill + 23 Berger having just come off the bench. Was Judge + 24 Berger a respected member of the judiciary in Palm + 25 Beach County? + +1 A Very much so, and that's why I welcomed him + 2 to help with the file. + +3 Q Did he leave under any circumstances that + 4 gave rise to any suspicion whatsoever? + +5 MR. LINK: Object to the form. + +6 THE WITNESS: Not at all. + +7 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +8 Q Who were the other people that you were + 9 working with? + +10 A Like I said, I conducted -- I ran the files. + 11 But other people -- + +12 Q When I say working with, I'm not talking + 13 about limiting that question to people who worked on + 14 the Epstein files. Who were the other folks that + 15 were a part of this firm? + +16 A Steve Jaffe, Gary ██████████, Matt Weissing. + 17 Gary's ██████████ father was an appellate judge. In + 18 fact, I think he was still on the bench then when we + 19 were working there together. Gary is a senator now. + 20 Matt Weissing, who became my partner. Steve Jaffe, + 21 same. Mark Fistos, same. + +22 These are high-quality people. Good + 23 lawyers. The people that I associated with there, + 24 good lawyers, good people, not doing anything bad. + 25 They're just lawyers who are good lawyers. That's + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. + +v. + +.1SC -7 ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE SUPPORT OF HIS REVISED 0 APPENDIX IN OTION IN LIMINE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey s et pstein") files this Appendix in support of his revised Omnibus Motion in Limine ein vlfll supplement this Appendix to attach the actual his revised Motion: documents and testimony cited h + +Cos + +#### I. DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S COMPLAINT + +## A. Cit N verage: November 3-6, 2009 + +On Nov m 3, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "Scott Rothste s ent deals seemed too good to be true." Sally Kestin, Jon Burstein & Brittany Wallin Y tt Rothstein's investment deals seemed too good to be true, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 3, 2009.1 The Sun-Sentinel reported that "Rothstein attracted investors by promising huge returns and selling settlements he said he'd reached in sex discrimination and whistle-blower cases, + +Available at http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-I I -03/news/sfl-rothstein-investment-plan-I I sbnov03\_1\_scott-rothstein-stuart-rosenfeldt-firm. + +documents he gave prospective clients show." Id. The Sun-Sentinel quoted Alan Sakowitz, "a Miami lawyer and developer() [who] told the Sun Sentinel he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor three times, but quickly became suspicious. 'I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake settlements,' Sakowitz said." Id. According to the Sun-Sentinel, a "spokesman for Ban n Income Fund, an investment group that collected \$65 million and invested an undiscl amo t with Rothstein, said it contacted federal prosecutors in recent days with conc `suspicious activity?" Id. The Sun-Sentinel interviewed Rosenfeldt, who told th aper that "several of [his] co-workers may have done work for [Rothstein's] invest. siness without realizing its scope or nature." Id. The Sun-Sentinel reported that i ed "Rothstein's confidential offerings," which "describe[d] extremely high largely unregulated investment opportunities," one of which "offered invest nt return in three months, far more than the troubled and bond markets." akot told the Sun-Sentinel that "Rothstein boasted of having sophisticated eavesdrop ent and that former cops would sift through potential defendants' garbage," that "R hste claimed to have a 'huge volume of cases, an employer sleeping with the secreta eptionist,'" and that Rothstein claimed he "offered his clients a way to avoid wa g for t e [settlement] money by giving them a lesser amount, but in a lump sum up fro d. The Sun-Sentinel said that, according to Rothstein's offering documents, RRA out sexual discrimination and whistle-blower cases and used former cops to dig up incrimina ng evidence," "the firm urged the targets of the claims to pay a settlement without a public lawsuit," "'[t]hese types of cases are highly confidential and thus, quite lucrative, because the defendants place a high premium on keeping the details of the case confidential,' and investors + +"would receive the full settlement amount in three to 12 months, with a guaranteed minimum 20 percent return[.]" + +On November 6, 2009, the New Times Broward-Palm Beach printed an article entitled "Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy." Bob Norman, Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy, New Times Broward-Palm Beach, Nov. 6, 2009. dia2k ccording il to the New Times, "[o]ne way" that Rothstein enticed investors "was by tri [th ] into believing that his firm was representing numerous underaged girls who ha i alm Beach billionaire and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein." Id. T "Rothstein claimed that he had flight logs showing that Epstei including former President Bill Clinton, on his private Rothstein "told investors that Epstein, Clinton, a choice but to settle these cases and that it was e that investors "then ponied up million settlements to the victims, and was "no indication that the fo other celebrity names ba Imes reported that xtremely prominent people, e of the plaintiffs" and that ebrities involved basically had no treasure-trove." Id. The New Times said 'nye in the settlements, pay out a portion of those " but Rothstein was "fabricating the story" and there ident, who was at one time a real friend of Epstein's, and ut by Rothstein were involved in any way." Id. + +The New es gtZted "Fort Lauderdale attorney Bill Scherer, who [wa]s representing multiple Rot investors.... 'He used the [Epstein case] as a showpiece, as bait,' said Scherer. 'Tha he raised all the money. He would use legitimate cases as bait for luring investors into fictional cases. All the cases he allegedly structured were fictional. I don't believe there was a real one in there.'" Id. The New Times mentioned "one legitimate case involving Epstein and + +2 Available at http://vAvw.browardpalmbeach.com/news/scott-rothstein-the-jeffrey-epstein-andbill-clinton-ploy-6471700. + +an underaged girl" involving RRA; identified William Berger, not , as the attorney handling the matter; and reported that "[s]ources saki] they believe[dj Berger wasn't involved in Rothstein's scam." Id. A source described the Epstein fabrications as "one of Rothstein's more profitable creations," and told the New Tunes to "'[t]hink of the legitimate Epstein civil case as a car on the road.. . . (t)hen think of that car driving off the road onto heavy terrain and Aimut into four-wheel drive. That's what happened here, and Rothstein was at the wheel.'" + +#### B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint + +On November 9, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office y r the Southern District of Florida filed a civil forfeiture action against certain property cl ik9) hstein. The complaint said Rothstein "and others" had been operating a Ponzi sche si e 5. (S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:09 cv-61780-WJZ DE-1 ¶ 13.) The Government alle j ,h i dthstein had told potential investors that his firm had negotiated settlements bet I vt ents and would-be defendants and that, under the terms of these settlements, urn' lients would receive substantial payments in exchange for not filing "civil chi' s al harassment and other labor-related cases." (Id. ¶ 14.) Rothstein offered inves rs an portunity to purchase these settlements at a discount. (Id.) The firm's clients woul cricrirve less money, but they would be paid immediately in a lump sum. (Id.) Over time, " e inves rs would receive the full value of the clients' settlements. (Id.) The problem, thcabyernment alleged, was that the settlements were not real. (Id.1 15.) Rothstein used es ors' money to pay older investors the money they were supposed to receive from the phony settlements they thought they had purchased. (Id.) + +#### C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009 + +On November 12, 2009, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel printed an article entitled "FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone." Sally Kestin and Peter Franccschina, FBI doubts Rothstein ran a Ponzi scheme alone, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 12, 2009.3 The Sun-Sentinel reported that "[t]he FBI confirmed Thursday what many have speculated since the Scott Rothstein scandal broke: The flashy lawyer could not have defrauded investors of hundreds of millions without help. 'I do not believe that this was a one-man show,' said John Gil lies, head of the FBI in South Florida." Id. + +## D. The on, \\ Investors' Complaint s >- + +On November 20, 2009, William Scherer, the attorney quoted in th es article on November 6, 2009. sued Rothstein. David Boden, Debra la, ndre mett, TD Bank, N.A., Spinosa. Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsk Preve on behalf of investors Razorback Funding, LLC, D3 Capital Club, L nvestment, LLC, Linda Von Allmen (as trustee of the Von Allmen Dynasty T artners, LP, and Kretschmar. (I 7th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943A S lbc ith -3.) The plaintiffs alleged Rothstein had "devised an elaborate plan to assign p Q \* e ....,pl tiffs' confidential settlements with structured payments to investors at a lump s is ted rate. In reality, while some of the cases relied upon to induce investor fun e real, all of the confidential settlements were purely fabricated. Indeed. retu earlier investors were not made via structured payments, but instead were made with a principal obtained from later investors—a classic Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ 2.) The plaint i I s er alleged that Investors were told that the Principal Conspirators had an exten ouse private investigative team, including former F.B.I. and C.I.A. agents, whose singular t sk was to obtain compromising evidence against high-profile putative defendants. Rothstein's story was that the evidence and surveillance acquired. often supporting civil causes of + +&#x27; Available at http:// http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009- I I -12/live/fl-rothstein-associates-200911 12\_l\_rothstein-rosenfeldt-adler-scott-rothstein-alan-sakowitz. + +action ranging from sexual harassment to mass tort cover-ups to whistle-blower claims, was presented to the putative defendant who was then offered an opportunity to avoid litigation and the negative publicity associated therewith by agreeing to resolve the matter voluntarily by and through a confidential settlement with the putative plaintiff.” (*Id.* ¶ 28.) The investors alleged that “Rothstein would show investors the purported settlement agreement in an attempt to substantiate the deal; however, because the settlements were pre-suit and confidential, the names of the putative plaintiffs and putative defendants were redacted.” (*Id.* ¶ 34.) + +The investors further alleged “the purported settlements, *albeit* fraudulent, were based on actual cases being handled by RRA”—including one of Edwards’ cases against Epstein: + +One of the settlements involved herein was based upon facts surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous billionaire financier. In fact, RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein’s alleged victims in a civil case styled *Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein*, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered “the opportunity” to invest in a pre-suit \$30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising from the same set of operative facts as the *Jane Doe* case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff. . . . To augment his concocted story Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker’s boxes of actual case files in *Jane Doe* in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein claimed that his investigative team discovered that there were high-profile witnesses onboard Epstein’s private jet where some of the alleged sexual assaults took place and showed D3 copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. Because of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered \$200,000,000.00 for settlement of the claims held by various young women who were his victims. Adding fuel to the fire, the investigative team representative privately told a D3 representative that they found three additional claimants which Rothstein did not yet know about. . . . + +Additionally, Rothstein used RRA’s representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to the underlying litigation, but potentially beneficial to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. For instance, RRA relentlessly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with other famous individuals knowing full well that no under age women were on board and no illicit activities took place. RRA also inappropriately attempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein’s lies. + +(Id. ¶¶ 40-41.) + +The investors also alleged that, "even after Rothstein's October 27, 2009 departure to Morocco, millions of dollars continued to flow out of RRA accounts from the Fort Lauderdale TD Bank accounts, indicative of an insider(s) maintaining operations of the Ponzi scheme." (Id. ¶ I 02c.) The investors further alleged that "[a] Ponzi scheme cannot be operated wit ut insider help. Plaintiffs believe that additional members of RRA, including its non-lave gators, were used by Rothstein to perpetuate, promote and facilitate the Ponzi s e details of these individuals['] or entities['] involvement¶ and participation is pr ently un nown but further allegations and counts will be added as discovery is conduc information concerning the complicity of these individuals or entities is confirmed." + +#### E. Cited News Coverage: November + +On November 24, 2009, The Mia rinted an article entitled "Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid salaries w fi ." Jay Weaver & Scott Hiaasen, Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme paid solar s I firm, The Miami Herald, Nov. 24, 2009. According to the article, "Rothstein's law irm g erated revenue of \$8 million in one recent year, yet his 70 lawyer firm had a payroll 18million, prosecutors said. Rothstein, who owned half of Rothstein Rosenfeldt AdleS,used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said.- Id. Q r 'cle further reported that "[t]he civil forfeiture is based on money-laundering al leg at othstein amassed his fortune by defrauding investors, prosecutors said. Investors bought shires in his fabricated confidential settlements from employment-discrimination and other civil cases during the past four years — investments that promised returns of up to 40 percent.- Id. + +#### F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors + +On November 23, 2009, and November 27, 2009, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed amended civil forfeiture complaints against Rothstein's + +property. (S.D. Ha. Case No. 0:09-cv-61780-WJZ DE-14, DE-19.) The Government again alleged that Rothstein "and others" had been running a Ponzi scheme. See id. + +Scherer filed an amended complaint on behalf of the investor plaintiffs on November 25, 2009. (See 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.) The amended complaint quoted a November 23, 2009, interview of Rothstein by the Sun-Sentinel: "Rothstei . . stated that `karma has caught up with him, but it will catch up with others too . . . Yo n a n full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at t . ¶ 7.) The plaintiffs did not amend their allegations concerning the cases against r. ee generally 17th Jud. Cir. Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE DE-12.) + +## G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Inform tucc • h,.), + +On December 1, 2009, the FBI arrested Rot igt \ft •ri r e United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a c ' Si icinformation against him. The information identified RRA as a criminal enterprise D.. Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-J1C DE-1 ¶ 2.) The government alleged that, from 200 u it ember 2009, Rothstcin and others had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activi that i eluded mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to launder m ybr(Id. ¶¶ 3-4.) According to the Government, Rothstein and his unidentified co-co t piratt had operated a Ponzi scheme and obtained \$1.2 billion from investors by fraud. (/ lit) The Government repeated its allegations that Rothstein had lied to investors, + +The amended complaint misquotes the article slightly. "'You're hurting my daughter, you're hurting my son,' [Rothstein] said. (Rothstein has a biological daughter who is 16, and the son he's talking about is someone he took on as a sort of mentor, he said this summer.) `Haven't I already hurt them enough?' he asked, before delivering a final 'message' and hanging up. He called back this evening, responding to a text message. He said karma is going to get him, but it's going to get other people, too. 'You're in a town full of thieves, and at the end of the day, everyone will see. I'll leave it at that.' Brittany Wallman, Scott Rothstein: "You're in a town full of thieves", S. Ha. Sun-Sentinel, Nov. 23, 2009. Available at littp://www.sun-sentinel.com/s11-intblog-2009- I I -Scott rothstein\_havent\_i\_hurt-story.html. + +(fr. at I + +Q. Complaint in this action alleges that L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her alleged damages. What does that mean? + +had told them that his firm had settled certain sexual harassment and whistleblower cases on behalf of its clients and obtained sizeable payouts, and had offered investors the opportunity to purchase these phony settlements at a discount. (Id. ¶¶ 10-11.) The Government alleged that Rothstein and his co-conspirators had "created false and fictitious documents, including confidential settlement agreements," and "made false statements to current investors in order to convince them 14 re-invest in additional purported confidential settlement agreements." (Id ¶¶ 21, 23.) + +#### II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND AFFID CARDING PROBABLE CAUSE + +## A. Epstein's Deposition—March 17, 2010 + +Epstein testified as follows: + +Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +A. L.M. is part of a conspiracy with Scott Ro -- creating fraudulent cases of a sexu already charged the firm of Rothstei a partner, with creating, fabricate respect to me, specifically, in of millions of dollars. 4B dley C) creating -- excuse me nature iniwich the U.S. Attorney has which is a partner, was s cases of a sexua nature, inc uding cases with e unsuspecting investors in South Florida out + +Q. What role do you cont d L. ayed in that conspiracy to create fraudulent cases? + +A. L.M.'s testimon fore s e met Mr. was dramatically -- sworn testimony to the FBI was dramati erent after she came in contact with Mr. JM, where her testim then hanged to sort of a hostile and had claims o -- c aims never made before, made to anyone before, and allegations that I've read in her Complaint that that Cy n matically different from the ones she had spoken to the FBI about, sir. + +A. I believe that as part of the scheme to defraud investors in South Florida out of millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across the board. And the only way -- in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what I've read in the paper, claims that I've settled cases for \$200-million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of serious sum of money, which is outrageous. + +(Tr. at 19:7-20:1.) + +Q. Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against him? + +A. Yes, many things. + +Q. List them for me, please. + +A. He has -- he has gone to the media out of, I believe, in an attempt to gin He has contacted the media. He has used the media for his own pu discovery -- he has engaged in discovery proceedings that bear no filed against me by any of his clients. His firm, which he's the of forging a Federal Judge's signature. allegations. has brought hip to any case as been accused + +(Tr. at 23:4-19.) + +Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt to and cn aged in what you contend to be irrelev personally, do that forms the bas' up, unquote, these allegations proceedings, what else did Mr. wsuit? + +A. Mr. personally, engaged wi jail cell, potentially for the rest of hi -- excuse me -- what I've read name on it, with other attorne alleging multi-million dol millions of dollars. He the FBI and the U.S. A enterprise. rs, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal hared information, what I've been told and papers, 13 boxes of information that had my . He counseled his clients to maintain a position in order for them to scam local investors out of any of his other partners already under investigation by ve been accused by the U.S. Attorney of running a criminal + +A. can think of at the moment? + +Q. What media did Mr. go to? + +A. I am aware of at least the Daily News in New York City. I have been told by other people that there were other media, local media. I've been told that the — his investigator was sent to California to harass people representing his -- Brad l= investigator— representing fictitiously, fraudulently that he was a FBI agent to try to gather information for Mr. claims. + +Anything else? + +(Tr. at 25:6-26:15.) + +Q. What does an investigator going to California have to do with Mr. allegedly going to the media in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these allegations? + +A. ... It's part of Mr. scheme to involve people who have nothing to do with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back to the media and gin up his stories and make false allegations of people that have sexually charged nature cases in order to attempt to fleece investors, local investors out of millions of dollars. His firm has been accused the U.S. Attorney of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators, by illegal wire s by illegal methods of eavesdropping in order to go to the media and generate cases"is + +Q. When did Mr. go to the Daily News? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. How did he go to the Daily News? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. What did he say to the Daily News? + +A. I believe Mr. knows that. I doty'LkiMy exactly what he said. + +Q. What is the source of your informatics at h went to the Daily News at all, ever? + +A. It's attorney/client. + +Q. You said you were told ol\$er people that he went to other media representatives? + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are other 15eople that told you that? + +A. I do II It the moment. + +Q. these other people who you don't remember tell you Mr. did with 4t gpect to other media representatives besides the Daily News? + +0 + +A. Again, the question again? + +Q. What did these other people tell you Mr. did with respect to going to other media? + +A. Mr. went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medias and making statements to local press regarding false claims made by his clients in order that Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail. could defraud, along with his other partners of his firm, local Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of millions of dollars. + +Q. When did these other people whose identity you can't remember tell you these things that Brad did. + +A. Sometime in the past year. + +Q. How many other people were there who told you these things about Mr. Ed + +A. I don't recall with specificity. + +A. I would say, probably five to ten. + +Q. Well, do you recall in any degree how many there were? O + +Q. Where were you when these conversations took place t . can't// -- the identity of those participants you can't remember? + +Mr. Pike: So we're clear, within the last year -- correct -. ise? + +Mr. Scarola: Well, that's what your client said. \ I eve a word he says, but that's what he said. + +A. Again, sir? + +Q. Yes, sir. Where did t se con \*i l rsations with these five to ten people take place whose identity you can't reme r? + +A. On the te/ephone. + +Q. Why, maimed the phone calls? A + +A. ese questions, I have no -- I don't have any recollection. + +Q. Did the people who were on the phone identify themselves or were these anonymous callers? + +A. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I don't recall with specificity. + +Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly communicate to the Daily News to quote, gin up these allegations, unquote? + +A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. — not quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred to as Mr. statements. + +Q-Would you read the question back, please, Sandy? + +A. He alleged that third parties had already been involved in some allegations to do with sexual misconduct. A Cots + +Q. Which third parties? + +A. I don't recall sitting here today. + +Q. Involved how? + +A. If I recall with specificity, if I had the articles in f n Maybe next time. I would be able to recall. + +Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean?S \ + +• • • + +A. It means craft allegations of mu data of \$50-million, settl partners to fleece based on cases that didn' Emil \r dollar cases; in fact, alleging in L.M.'s case order for Scott Rothstein and the rest of Mr. ng investors out of millions and millions of dollars eged cases that I had settled. + +(Tr. at 28:14-33:21.) + +Q. you. Was your referen note, gin up these allegations, unquote, a reference to allegations made agai you. + +A. AS p e vast conspiracy of the Rothstein firm and Mr. participation in it, it has bQen alleged that many cases were fraudulently brought -- alleged that have been brought; ginned up, meaning, crafted, multi-million dollar numbers put on cases in order to fleece investors, where his partner, Scott Rothstein, currently sits in jail for just those purposes, Mr. Scarola. + +Q. My question to you is: Did the reference to, quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations against you? + +A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper reports. + +(Tr. at 34:3-22.) + +- Q. What specific discovery proceedings did Mr. engage in which you contend form the basis for your lawsuit? +- A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. +- Q. Which various people? Who? +- A. For example, he tried to depose Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of g he and his firm could fraudulently steal, craft money from unsus Florida out of millions of dollars. city so that tors in South + +('Tr. at 36:10-23.) + +- Q. You said something about Mr. sharing 13 x formation with somebody - +- A. Yes. +- Q. -- as forming part of the basis for you +- A. Correct. ainst Mr. correct? +- Q. All right. With whom did s share these 13 boxes of information? +- A. It has been reported in a Sc r Complaint that he shared those boxes with the partners of his firm that was th o ally accused by the U.S. Attorney, sir, of being a criminal enterprise. +- Q. +- A. +- Q. Do yone ?Sher my question? me who he shared it with? +- A. The partners of his firm, sir. +- Q. Okay. So part of the basis of your lawsuit is that Mr. own law firm to see 13 boxes of information; is that correct? allowed members of his +- A. No, that's not co claim is that the 13 boxes of information that were shown to investors by Mr. partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by the press contain multiple cases, fraudulently -- and if you like the word -- fabricated in order to fleece + +investors out of money. The 13 boxes were shared with investors, Mr. Mr. partners and some of those partners currently under indi[ct]ment, t e others already sitting in jail. + +(Tr. at 37:18-38:22.) + +Q. Which newspaper said which case was fabricated? + +A. Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were fabricated, to my best recoil ion. The Scherer complaint alleged many fabricated cases, sir. + +(Tr. at 39:7-12.) + +Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against Mr. whit basis of this lawsuit is something having to do with sen mg a Would you tell me, please, more specifically what it is that to sendin an investigator to California which you cont Mr. ?] S end i form the or to California. ards did with regard a legal claim against + +A. Reported widely in the newspapers is the by the Rothstein firm while Mr. Edwa investigator, Mr. Fisten, who's menti agent, falsely represented himself I activities, wire taps, and methods asically been bringing these cases. The Complaint, represented himself as an FBI gent. + +Do you have any personal in California? nything that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was + +A. I'm sorry. Basest/74r attorney/client privilege, I can't answer. + +(Tr. at 48:9-49:1 + +Q. Is it Ntition that Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap? + +A. I ely reported in the newspaper -- + +Q. not asking [if] it was reported -- + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. -- in the newspaper. + +A. Excuse me. + +Q. I want to know whether your contention is that Mr. wire tap. was involved in an illegal + +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. ever having engaged in any illegal wire tap? + +- A. I have no personal knowledge; however, what I read in the newspapers d widely reported is that his firm, and I believe Mr. Sakowitz went to the FBI after Ewa Id that the firm was engaged in illegal wire taps and his partners were engaged i tal wire taps. The FBI, the U.S. Attorney has accused his firm of RICO, being the 'mina) fraud enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in illegal w\* ut the answer specifically to your question about personal knowledge, sir, no + +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers in partners were involved in illegal wire to newspapers quoted as sophisticated meth investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a knowledge, myself, sir, no. a that Mr. firm, his fact gathering, using what the kowitz, who was approached as an , alleges similar activities. But personal + +- A. It's been widely reported in the newspaper that his firm and his partners were involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired former FBI and law enforcement officials in order to fabricate cases of a sexually charged nature against me and others. + +Do you have any personal knowledge of Mr. iyy tav been involved in any illegal or improper eavesdropping? + +- Q. Do you have any personal It ge hat obstructions of justice? was ever involved in + +- A. It's attorney/client privi C r,i'm afraid. + +- A. Qeof the newspapers, which have accused his firm of a monstrous fraud, purported e largest fraud in South Florida's history, accused by the U.S. Attorney, where his paatner sits in jail -- excuse me -- reported in the newspapers of boxes of material on Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot answer that question because of attorney/client privilege. + +- Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that ever forged Federal Court Orders and/or Opinions? + +- A. It's attorney/client privilege. + +Do you have any nal knowledge that actionabl uds? was ever involved in any + +Q. Y you ever see, hear, smell, taste, or touch anything that communicated to you and not through the report of some third person or newspaper that w personally involved in compromising the core values of both State an era justice systems in South Florida. + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge were unsupportable? ever filed legal papers that + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that was ever involved in the marketing of non-existent Epstein settlements? + +A. I'm sorry. I would like to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege I cannot today. + +Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were subject to, quote, abusive investigat y tactics. Other than those matters previously referred to in earlier questions, is it yo r ntention that had any personal involvement in any other, ote, usive investigatory tactics? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers that Mr. -- wildly abusive practices throughout the State of Flori investors out of millions of dollars. The U.S. Att engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. Mr. S amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. I have attorney/client privileged information, regard' engaged in widely o fleece unsuspecting omplaint alleges his firm mplaint alleges monstrous knowledge, separate from the ards. + +A. I'm afraid it's attorney/clie + +Q. Do you have any perso that, quote, compromi Florida? edge that Mr. was ever involved in any conduct core values of both State and Federal justice systems in South + +A. Can t -- can you define for me what you mean by "personal knowledge," sir? + +Mr. Pike: Form. Same instruction with regard to attorney/client. + +A. Yes. Are you suggesting that anyone who told me specifically or things that I might have read that specifically relate to him, is not what you've been asking me for? + +Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly right. + +A. You told me if I hear something, that's not personal knowledge. + +Q. Not if you hear it from somebody else. + +A. Who else would I hear it from, besides somebody else, sir? + +Q. Well, if you heard it directly yourself. + +A. From who? + +Q. Maybe Mr. + +A. Uh-huh. Is that the only person, sir? + +Q. That's the only person, that's correct. CSSA + +A. Well, if it's the only person, separate from attorney/client rivi l)cannot answer that. + +(Tr. at 49:13-55:22.) + +Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a purpose i st,fs lawsuit -- + +A. Yes. + +Q. -- to vindicate the hardworking and est fa yers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is of this Complaint. + +A. Yes, sir. + +Q. Who are those hardwo ing all4honest lawyers on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint? + +A. Yes. The 41S. Att ey, sir, has accused the Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system le cl of abuse never seen before in the United States history, of forging docu en an affront to any decent lawyer, signing Judge's Orders, sending false enez, Its o other lawyers. The people who have been -- excuse me -- the Complaint by . Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the law firm, as well as Mr. -- my mplaint says, Mr. being a part of that. + +(Tr. at 57:2-57:25.) + +Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking and honest lawyers" are that are referred to in that section of your Complaint. + +A. My attorneys, at least. arc honest. + +Q. Which ones? + +A. All of them. + +Q. And you say that you want to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients? + +A. That's correct. + +Q. Which clients? + +A. Me, some of the other clients, in fact, abused by the Rothstein firm. I don't the full extent. Hopefully when we get to trial, we're oin to find out the exte ple, the lawyers, the clients that were abused by Mr. and the Rothst e have asked for Scott Rothstein's deposition. We hopefully will get it. will give us some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact, been handletra y a uses they've undergone, including forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. + +(Tr. at 59:11-25.) + +Q. And did you mean to say what this sentence says, endeavored to vindicate the hardworking and h adversely affected by the misconduct that is t tein racketeering enterprise is and their clients, who were f this Complaint?" + +Mr. Pike: Okay. I'm going to move to strike. is cterizes the language of the document. The document reads as follows, for s the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromi c re values of both State and Federal justice systems in South Florida and t. the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adverse! y the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint." + +Q. Is that what you meant + +A. What I meant to 't is - seems to me somewhat unclear -- is that the Rothstein firm, along with Mr. s, is part of a criminal enterprise, the largest -- excuse me — the largest cr rise in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, engaging in ille•a w taps, illegal behaviors. And part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which mea' ie e should set right. And if it's not clear, the Rothstein firm compromised the of our legal justice system. It abused every — many of the precepts, the most on ues of the American justice system. And, in fact, I believe this lawsuit, part of the for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the various techniques of attorney/client p ' ilege, abuse of techni ue abuse of discovery, illegal wire taps, forging signatures engaged in by both Mr. and his firm. + +Q. So it is your contention that Mr. was part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Yes, it is. + +Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Attorney/client privilege. + +(Tr. at 62:13-64:3.) + +Q. What knowledge do you have of Brad ever having personally engaged in mail fraud? + +A. It's been widely reported in the press. + +Q. I'mgoing to withdraw my question. What person knowledge do yo e of Bradley ever having been engaged in any mail fraud? + +A. Will you describe what you mean by "personal knowledge," sip + +Q. I mean direct observation through your senses on your pa + +A. So are you asking me whether or not I've witnes ending something directly, putting physically in the mail, sir? + +Q. I'm asking whether you have ever person Sy sed ever having engaged in mail fraud. + +A. I'm not sure how that's possible iddyl6 witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's done? + +Q. So the answer to my questi i t y aiel on't know; is that correct? + +A. My answer to your qu ... I've asked for a clarification. + +Q. Have you ever personally witnessed engaging in mail fraud? + +A. No, s' + +Q. ver personally witnessed Edward -- engaged in wire fraud? + +A. w would one -- I'm not sure how anyone would personal -- have personal knowledge, wi ess someone engaging in wire fraud, unless they were simply sitting over their computer looking at their bank accounts. So, unfortunately, I would have to say, no, sir. + +Q. Have you ever personally witnessed engaged in money laundering? + +A. Again, sir, the U.S. Attorney's Complaint of the Rothstein firm alleges money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, RICO claims of Mr. partners and his firm, calling the firm the largest criminal enterprise in South Florida's history, accused of fabricating malicious cases, sir, of a sexually charged nature in order to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of millions of dollars. + +Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever personally participated in any of that wrongdoing? + +A. I'm afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +Q. Do you have any evidence — knowledge of any evidence whatsoever It 1 r. dwards ever participated in any effort to market any kind of investment in milt + +A. I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence whatsoever dwards was ever a participant in devising a plan through which were sol ed confidential assignments of a structured payout settlement? + +A. The newspapers and blogs have widely typo firm crafted — would you repeat the question for me, again, sir? + +Q. Yes sir. I want to know whether personally ever participate confidential assignments of a st y knowledge of evidence that vis g a plan through which were sold purixte out settlement? + +A. I'd like to answer that y saying that the newspapers have reported that his firm was engaged in fraudu ctured settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. With t to my personal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward to e point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to assert the attom client ivilege. + +Q. You t alleges that Rothstein and others in RRA were using RRA to market i .. Who are the others referred to in the Complaint? + +A. a ny understanding of the U.S. Attorney's Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it is the partners and people who held themselves out to be partners of the Roth -- Scott Rothstein, including Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. and other people associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane M, if that's how you pronounce her name, Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. + +Which -- which source of information referenced in that answer specifically made reference to Mr. + +A. I don't know. + +(Tr. at 74:4—8.) + +Q. Do you have any information indi anyone associated with the Rot statements were made about t Epstein and the value there AS /SCIC)C that dley ever had any knowledge of holding meetings during which, quote, "false of cases/clients that existed or RRA had against + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +Q. But you do have a recollection that one or more of them did: is that correct? + +A. I don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 64:20-69:6.) + +Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? + +A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers, sir, that the Rothstein firm en sifting through many people's garbage in order -- in an attempt to blackmail t + +(Tr. at 74:5-10.) + +Q. Yes. I'd like to know what the answer to that question is. anyone ever sift through your garbage looking for damaging evidence? + +A. My best recoil on is the .S. Attorney has accused the Rothstein firm of just those types of meetings whe rtners got together, schemed to defraud local investors of millions of dollars fabr flog cases of a sexually charged nature. And whether Mr. persona rticipated, I'm going to at least today, sir, have to assert the attorney c lent privi :47) bu k forward to one day disclosing it. + +(Tr. at 7 5.) + +Q. graph 23 of your Complaint says that: "RRA, Rothstein and a claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clientnhr, were able to effectively use initials," et cetera. Do you have any knowledge that fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? + +• • • + +A. I believe Mr. Scherer's Complaint -- + +Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. I'm not asking about any evidence that you have. + +• • • + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and his claim against the Rothstein firm for a massive fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to — at least in the -- described in the public press, because he went to the FBI for fabricating cases that included initials. With respect to anything specific with Mr. I'm going to have to claim the attorney/client privilege today, sir. + +Q. S ave any -- do you have knowledge of the existence of any evi that knew that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Po e ? + +A. That's attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that w have known that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as fp a Ponzi scheme? should + +A. And today I'm going to have to asse y/client privilege. ... Separate from the communication I've had with my a s, l n't answer that question. + +(Tr. at 77:19—80:6.) + +Q. Do you have any evide the sale of an interest i personal injury lawsuits? sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with + +A. The newsp rs ha a widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settleme cases of a sexual nature, including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the d i r en m Mr. and his firm and we have not been able to get them as of ye .nfident that once we do, I will be able to answer your questions with more + +Q. ou sit here today, do you have any evidence whatsoever to support an assertion that M, individually and personally, sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? + +A. You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege to the answer, I'm afraid, but I'd like to answer that question. + +Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence indicating that ever reached agreements to share attorney's fees with non-lawyers? + +A. In fact, Mr. Scarola, we have subpoenaed Mr. documents and documents from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me more specificity with the answers to that question. I'm looking forward to getting the -- that specific evidence. With respect to what we currently know, sitting here today, I'm unfortunately going to have laim my attorney/client privilege. + +Q. Do you today have any evidence to support an assertion that s ever used investor money to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front money they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +A. I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client privi afraid, though I'd like to answer that question as well, sir. + +Q. Do you have any evidence to support the iollythat conducted searches, wire taps or intercepted conve lation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. Your question, once again asked di eavesdropping? Did he walk to he, personally, stand outsid behavior in an attempt t attorney has filed a Co that his firm did. The subpoenaed used my na not received any. as Mr. personally involved in the ouse and sort of ut a bug in their house? Did estion is, did Mr. firm engage in this I investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. g that they did. The Complaints filed by Scherer saying omplaint says my name and the boxes of files that we've sir. We have requested information, but up until today have e you a more specific answer, I'm afraid I cannot. + +Q. Do you know edge of any evidence that ever conducted searches, wirecs pted conversations in violation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +A. a newspapers and the U.S. Attorney's Complaint widely reported that Mr. fi and people hired by his firm, investigators hired by his firm fraudulently representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in just those activities, sir. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that was ever aware of any such activities. + +A. I'm going to have to -- ... assert the attorney/client privilege to that, sir. + +Q. Do you have any knowledge that ever participated in or was aware of actions that utilized the judicial process, including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +• • • + +A. The pleadings of Mr. Scherer with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South Florida's history engaged in by Mr. film and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, not only illegal wi taps and eavesdropping, but an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe s or itself. Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. today, I'm going to hcto rt the attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + +Q. ,it air contention that Mr. Scherer's Complaint even cotta name + +A. 1 don't recall, sir. + +(Tr. at 83:11-88:18.) + +Q. What are the dame es du.. .claim to haves consequence of any wrongdoing on the part of + +A. The cost of ridiculous litigation, of attorneys prepare responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various locat inimum, sir. + +Q. Which lawyers? + +A. Burman Critton, Jack G C o)leoe nd a bunch of the others, sir. + +Q. Which ones? the me me, please. + +A. Specifically -- I h thlt" many lawyers defending me here against Mr. I can't sit here -- at t om t I can't recall it with specificity. + +Q. You ber any of your lawyers' names? + +A. + +Q. B 'des Mr. -- besides the Burman Critton firm and Mr. Goldberger? + +A. Are you asking me for the firm, sir, or are you asking me for the names? + +Q. I want as much information as you can give me about this element of damage which you claim; and, that is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be damages in this case. + +A. Okay.... Mr. Roy Black. + +Q. Okay. Who else? + +- A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. Mr. Jay Lefkowitz. The firm of Burman Critton Luttier. That's it for the moment. + +- Q. How much have you paid the law firm of Burman Critton and Luttier which you claim is damages? + +- A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. + +- Q. How much? + +- A. I don't have that figure offhand. + +- Q. Can you give us any better figure than hundreds of thousands of dol + +- A. No, not sitting here today. + +- Q. Are you paying them on an hourly basis? C.) + +- A. Yes, sir. + +- Q. What is the hourly rate at which you are compe tt c nbers of the law firm? + +- A. They're ordinary rates. + +- Q. What are they? "(SiNr s + +- A. I don't know. + +- Q. How much have you paid ol erger? + +- A. I'm not aware total am + +- Q. What is the hourl at which you're paying Mr. Goldberger? + +hourly I !is norms ,hourly + +- Q. +- Q. FlotinA is at? + +- A. I do ow. ) + +- Q. H v much have you paid Mr. Black which you claim as damages in this case? + +- A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +- Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +- A. I believe so. + +- Q. What is the hourly rate? + +A. I'm not -- I do not know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? + +A. I don't know the exact amount, sir. + +Q. What's your best estimate? + +A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +A. I believe so. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? + +A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. + +Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? + +Q. At what hourly rate? + +A. I believe so. + +A. I don't know, sir. + +Q. How much are you pa -- how much have you paid Jay Lefkowitz? + +A. I'm not sure, sir. + +Q. Do you e any i a at all? + +A. Mo a h ndred thousand dollars. + +Q. A aying him on an hourly basis? + +A. , sir. + +Q. What's the hourly rate? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. What is the form of payment to your lawyers? How do you transfer money to them? + +A. I don't know, sir. + +CO'S-A + +Q. Pardon mc? + +A. I don't know. + +Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? + +A. I would guess so. + +Q. Who? + +A. I don't know. + +° ISA + +Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart from the money lawyers? + +A. The stress and emotional damage of itnpe s + +Q: Was the value of any of the three cases discussed at all? + +A: No. CO + +Q: Did Mr. Rothstein, did Mr. Rothstein appear to be knop led able about your cases? + +A: No. + +Q: Mr. Adler. was Mr. Adler someone that yo regular basis ... not content. Was Mr. A cases with prior to that meeting? d the cases with on a somewhat eo e that you had discussed these Epstein + +A: Yes. + +Q: What lawyers, other thin ;b -ou , were involved in the Epstein cases during the time you were associated with R ? + +A: What do you mea if ere involved?' I guess all. + +Q: What, w cases awyersractually worked on the file? I know Mr. Berger worked on the Epstein + +March 23, 2010, Tr. at 1 ) + +A: ited capacity, correct. + +Q: Mr. Adler I know attended Mr. Epstein's deposition, correct? + +A: Correct. + +March 23, 2010, Tr. at 230:15-231:1.) + +Deposition—October 10, 2013 + +testified as follows: + +Q: Okay. At the meetings that you -- at the meetings that occurred with these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, =, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that -- discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein ever discussed? + +A: I -- I would assume so. + +Q: Well, I -- + +A: In meetings, that we were talking about, was Epstein discussed? + +Q: Yeah, l -- I -- I assume, based upon the what we saw in the e-mails tod actly the purpose of the meeting, correct? + +A: Exactly, that was the purpose of the meeting. + +C O + +C. =. Deposition—November 10, 2017 + +testified as follows: + +So there is some truth that Rothstein is wea Aik %4Ap i on documents, the flight log that was obtained by you as the lead trial la r e nding lawsuits? + +A: There is some truth in the pending I its? yy + +Q: No. I'm saying that what Rot oing -- we all -- + +A: He used actual evidence fabricated story. + +Q: And the actual eviden hat as referred to here are these flight logs that you as the lead lawyer obtained nd brou t back to the Rothstein firm, right? + +A: I maintain evi nce for all of my cases at the Rothstein firm where I worked, yes. + +Q: That' 1 I confirming. + +(A: r that Rothstein gained access to it and used it to support his fairytale? It + +Oct. 10, 2013, Tr. at 205:9-22.) + +ov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 163:20-164:14.) + +Q: Were you reporting to Mr. Adler in how to represent the three Rothstein clients -- the three ladies -- on how to prosecute the Epstein matters? + +A: Well, this email is dated April 8th, 2009, so I had just started at the firm. I had just got there. Russ Adler was one of the only lawyers that I had known for years before I got to the firm. And Russ Adler handled sexual abuse cases. So, especially in the beginning, I talked to Russ about how to kind of navigate through the complications with Jeffrey Epstein and with the type of + +defense that was going on. So this just appears that Wayne Black and Russ Adler -- Wayne was the investigator -- that they were talking also about how to -- what we needed to do in the investigation. Yeah, Russ was definitely involved then. He didn't do much in the day-to-day, so I don't want to say anything to that. + +Q: I understand. But I'm talking about on April 8th, 2009, it looks to me like he's giving you instructions on what to do. Do you agree? + +A: Not giving me instructions on what to do. I mean, he's telling me bring M Nurik the non-prosecution agreement, is the instruction. + +Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 259:22-260:22) + +Q: Did you become aware of the fact that your Epstein-related files t nt in time had been requested by Scott Rothstein? + +A: Yes. + +Q: How did you become aware of that? + +A: I think Mike told me -- Fisten. + +Q: Was there any explanation offered as to, h co Rothstein wanted to see the Epsteinrelated files? + +A: That if these cases went to trial, nte o try the cases with me. + +Q: He who? + +A: He, Scott Rothstein, w the case with me. That's the explanation that I was given. + +Nov. 10, 201 Tr. at :14-322:2.) + +Q: You we em oyee, in your mind, and he was the lawyer ultimately at the firm responsible for tree cl ents, true? + +A: The ty lawyers at the firm. They all work for him. Hundreds of files. He's still the equity e firm, so they are the firm's files. They are not -- + +nderstand. You told me earlier. And I didn't realize that, that the interest that A had in three files, you gave up to Mr. Rothstein and became a salary employee, essentially. + +A: Gave up to RRA. + +Q: Mr. Rothstein's firm, correct? + +A: Right. We've established this. + +Q: And so that Mr. Rothstein was the lawyer at that firm as the -- one of two equity shareholders who was ultimately responsible for the three Epstein matters? + +A: For every case in the entire firm, including those -- + +Q Including the three Epstein matters? + +A: Every case, yeah. + +#### IV. Ad sc V. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY + +( Nov. 10,2017, Tr. at 338:10-339:7.) + +Q: You never spoke to Brad about this case? + +Rothstein testified as follows in this case: + +A: I didn't say that, but I had a lot more interaction . .. If to the people in the finn, if they are honest with you, they'll tell you my interact r more significant with Russ Adler, probably more so because he was a f mine. My interaction with Russ was far greater by many, many percents eraction with Brad, and then you go down the line. I had more interaction w r. er than I did with Mr. Fistos, more interaction with Jaffe than I did with Mr s, and so on. + +(Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 23:24-2 + +Q: Right. How did you know at and you said you were go' was the case that you c en you said these investors wanted to investigate a fake settlement, how did you know that this case + +A: From talking to all the the extent that I that I just said, Adler, Fistos, Jaffe, =, Mr. M, to e to him about it. + +A: I do cific recollection one way or the other. I remember speaking to him at leas brie the day or the day of or the day before the actual investor's due diligence was going on as to what was going on. And I may have spoke to him, I know I spoke to Russ, but may have spoke to him as well within a couple of days just prior to this due diligence be5ause I was trying to at least get some information in my head that I could use when I was creating this story for the investors. + +Did you s k wi about the case? + +(Rothstein's June 14,2012, Tr. at 25:12-26:6.) + +Q: Well, then explain to me. You testified earlier that what was important to the investors to see is that there was a real case, correct? + +A: Yes. + +Q: What did you look at or show them — what did you look at, first of all, to see if it was, in fact, a real case? + +A: I knew it was a real case. + +Q: How did you know? + +A: Because my lawyers told me it was a real case. I believed them. + +Q: What lawyers told you that? + +A: lrea told you it was a mixture of Russ and Jaffe and Fistos a er d Mr. I mean, I knew it was a real case. We had all these boxes ople really working on the file -- + +Q: How do you know -- + +A: --or they were pulling a hell of a scam on me. Not tha 't deserve it but [--] + +Q: How did you know, you just said you knew peop king really hard on this case. Who do you know was working on the case? + +A: The only people that I knew for certain rki g on the case was Brad and Russ Adler was doing his superviso k k, hatever that was. But other than that, I don't know which other lawyers we c isti Mr. I didn't get involved at that level. + +(Rothstein's June 14, 2012, Tr. at 5it : 5 ea. + +Rothstein testified as f lows • orback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein, 17th Jud. Cir. Case + +No. 062009CA062943 XCE: + +Q: You pull t so kind of a flight manifest; do you recall that? + +A: Yea point in time I believe it was either Brad or Russ Adler pointed o at one of the pieces of evidence they were using in the actual case was the flight And I actually used that to make a fairly big show. I found that those most of e in these cases the more significant our underlying investigation was and the more ta al izing it was, the more interested the investors got. We had that real piece of evidence and we used it to our advantage to attempt to secure the investor. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12, 2011, Tr. at 59:14-25.) + +Q: Didn't you add some sensational names to the manifest that weren't there to start with? + +A: I did. I did. + +Q: Tell us about that. + +A: There were -- I said that there were additional manifests -- if I remember correctly, I said there were additional manifests that we had discovered containing Bill Clinton's name, Prince Andrew, all being shown flying with young girls on the plane. + +Q: And do you know whether -- let me back up. The original manifests that were in evidence in the real case, didn't have those names on it? + +A: No, but it's interesting you bring that up because the way I came up with Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew was Mr. Adler and Mr. both told me on different oc ions that the reason the case — when we were discussing the actual real case, the n it was becoming so, quote, unquote, tasty because they had information that h d s flying Bill Clinton around and Prince Andrews around, the piece that was miS from the real case was the connection to the young girls. + +Q: The young girls — connection to the young girls was fiction, it + +A: Not as far as Mr. Epstein is concerned but as far as the o iled are concerned, yes. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 12,2011, Tr. at 60:10-61:9.) + +Q: When you were asked — this morning about E trds you really hesitated. I don't know if you know you did that. You were wyrn es, no, maybe so. On him you really paused. + +A: On the question as whether or not h&wed h ve turned us in, you mean? + +Q: Whether he was a player or w e ltatvas involved and you didn't quite answer. + +A: Just because of the way d and socialized with him, I did not know that he was at that level. There a ple, Barry M, second he found out about it would have absolutely done w s appropriately — supposed to do from an ethical standpoint. And then there pie who I say would never do that. And then there are people in the middle. I beli is probably in the middle. + +(Rothstein's Ded 1 2011, Tr. at 61:15-62:6.) + +Q: understand. I'm not going to have you go through all 13 boxes, but I'm trying to e of reference. You're talking about a flight manifest or flight manifests for jets, right? + +A: Yes. This is a very small document. It may have been one or two pages. And I had it specifically set aside. I'd either ask Mr. Adler or Mr. to isolate the flight manifest. + +(Rothstein's Dec. 19,2011, Tr. at 2278:13-20) + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 17, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Fina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6239e14c66fdcae5c95dd85f64b5225268631b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/EFTA02762550.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2794 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 62, + "chars": 110425, + "elapsed_seconds": 26.77, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 71.12199999999999 + ], + [ + 542.2784423828125, + 113.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 113.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS \nMOTION IN 'AMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 491.08514404296875, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 491.08514404296875, + 362.363037109375 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 362.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.072, + 458.158 + ], + [ + 335.8282775878906, + 458.158 + ], + [ + 335.8282775878906, + 472.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 279.072, + 472.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein Has Repeatedly Made Clear That He Alleged That [REDACTED] Cases Were \"Manufactured\" / \"Ginned Up\" / \"Crafted\" / \"Fabricated\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 586.4399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein Misunderstant thjJDifference Between Direct and Circumstantial \nEvidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 495.5827941894531, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 495.5827941894531, + 492.16998291015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 492.16998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Remaining g Blocks Crumble Under the Weight of the Law and \nthe Uncontested ecord acts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 526.5255126953125, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 526.5255126953125, + 492.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 492.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii The Exhi that pstein Challenges are Not Hearsay When They Are Not Being \nOffered to the Truth of the Matters Asserted.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 505.863037109375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 505.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 255.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 392.6141052246094, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 392.6141052246094, + 80.853515625 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 80.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO C\n0 \nEkDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 223.02227783203125 + ], + [ + 521.905029296875, + 223.02227783203125 + ], + [ + 521.905029296875, + 309.1825866699219 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 309.1825866699219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 326.5770263671875, + 464.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 326.5770263671875, + 478.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 478.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.37998962402344, + 527.9678344726562 + ], + [ + 324.2124938964844, + 527.9678344726562 + ], + [ + 324.2124938964844, + 579.0321960449219 + ], + [ + 133.37998962402344, + 579.0321960449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SEAIVP < C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.124, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 372.8406677246094, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 372.8406677246094, + 369.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 369.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE \nSUPPORT OF HIS REVISED 0 \nAPPENDIX IN \nOTION IN LIMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 508.7829284667969, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 508.7829284667969, + 367.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 367.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CITED OR REFERRED TO IN EPSTEIN'S \nCOMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 534.8677368164062, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 534.8677368164062, + 486.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 486.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Cit N verage: November 3-6, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 367.2008056640625, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 367.2008056640625, + 511.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 511.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Government's Civil Asset Forfeiture Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 411.966796875, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 411.966796875, + 260.947021484375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 260.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Referenced News Coverage: November 12, 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 615.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.4296875, + 615.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 391.4296875, + 630.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 630.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. The on, \\\\ Investors' Complaint s >-", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 218.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 502.6015319824219, + 218.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 502.6015319824219, + 234.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 234.3170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Cited News Coverage: November", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 366.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 366.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Amended Complaints Filed By The Government & Investors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 642.33 + ], + [ + 452.5328369140625, + 642.33 + ], + [ + 452.5328369140625, + 656.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 656.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Rothstein Arrested; Criminal Inform tucc \u2022 h,.),", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 384.4493713378906, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 384.4493713378906, + 340.8170471191406 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 340.8170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND AFFID CARDING \nPROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 531.9871826171875, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 531.9871826171875, + 275.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 275.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Deposition\u2014March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 341.7221374511719, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 341.7221374511719, + 299.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 299.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. \nEpstein's Deposition\u2014January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 317.5365295410156, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 317.5365295410156, + 152.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 152.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 331.20294189453125, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 331.20294189453125, + 102.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 102.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. Ad sc \nV. ROTHSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 486.89410400390625, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 486.89410400390625, + 238.10302734375 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 238.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 293 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 301 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "Text", + 77 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762550" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecd571dd1fadfe6813d3da88171384fa65e073ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:054ff2dfa08199dde31034283e328af1b3876e4de080f85917003fb02f6dc969 +size 3528 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..144d4c93f8d5b314443a27e1e43595e793681311 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762550/_page_14_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ea749193bcbb92f34aaf3c6c274c1abbb1454a6bd5a4eb5a002b86111f31874d +size 7691 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..926903d41d4df58cf6b206a18296bbccfb81d80e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.md @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY I T OF HIS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PjAn J. REOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PUrS AloWTO FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 90 D 90.203 + +Plaintiffitounter-Defendant, Jeffre ("Epstein"), hereby provides the Court with supplemental authority in support 90.203, as follows: ection to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Reques or Ju al Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 90.202 and + +I. Dol s v. ,,,,St , 187 So. 3d 262, 26647 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). The Second District Court of App Id at, "[b]ooking information obtained from a sheriff's website does not fall within It atters for which a court must take judicial notice under section 90.201, and it does not a ear to fall within the list of matters for which a court may take judicial notice under section 90.202." (Emphasis added). (Exhibit A.) + +2. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Darragh, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that website materials were inadmissible hearsay, and cited with approval St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Inst., P.A. v. Sanderson, 2006 WL 1320242 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2006), which held that "Web-sites are not self-authenticating. To authenticate printouts from a website, the party proffering the evidence must produce some statement or affidavit from someone with knowledge of the website ... for exam eb or someone else with personal knowledge would be sufficient." (Exhibit() + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on November 28, 2017, through the Co Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). attorneys listed on the portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINK i a ACH, PA 155 Ail% B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 I each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +iy• /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +187 So.3d 262 + +District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. + +> Roland DOLAN, Appellant, v. + +> STATE of Florida, Appellee. + +No. 2D14-3874. + +Feb.17, 2016. + +#### Synopsis + +Background: Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court, Pasco County, William R. S J., of felony battery. Defendant appealed. + +Holdings: The District Court of Appeal, Altenbernd, J., held that: + +[I] defendant's prior booking photo was not admissible to prove his prior conviction in the absence of any predicate testimony, and + +[2] copy of certified judgment without fmg insufficient to prove that defendant was, identified in the judgment. + +Reversed and remanded. + +\*263 Appeal from the William R. Court for Pasco County; + +#### Attorneys and + +Howard L. Briggs, Assistant mig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin blic Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. + +Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. + +## Opinion + +ALTENBERND, Judge. + +Roland Dolan appeals his judgment and sentence for a felony battery under section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2012), which required the jury to determine as an element of the offense that Mr. Dolan had committed a prior + +battery. Although there is a very high probability that Mr. \*264 Dolan's record includes a conviction fora prior battery, the State did not present sufficient admissible evidence of any prior conviction for battery before it rested and the court's actions thereafter did not effect a proper introduction of evidence. This case presents several interesting issues that should ooncern4rosecutors who must prove to a jury the existence conviction as an essential eleme like Pasco County where o do not always contain th Florida Rule of Cri however, is limited procedure used proper p Accord' ap fo r misdemeanor n o in a county emeanor judgments is contemplated by re 3.986. Our holding, ecision that the sua sponte th ittl court in this case was not a dmit evidence of a prior conviction. crsc the judgment and sentence on d for entry of a judgment and sentence or battery. + +## I. THE FACTS AND PROCEEDING IN CIRCUIT COURT + +On December 12, 2012, Mr. Dolan was a cab driver. In the early evening, he picked up a mother and her daughter outside of the emergency room of a hospital where the daughter had received treatment. While driving the two passengers home, Mr. Dolan drove in a manner that frightened the passengers. They ordered him to pull over and to stop. When he finally pulled off the road and stopped, the daughter got out of the vehicle and called the police. Mr. Dolan became angry and struck the mother, who was still in the vehicle. He also spat on her and called her names. + +An officer arrived at the scene. He interviewed Mr. Dolan and the two passengers and collected written statements from the two passengers. The officer established probable cause to believe that Mr. Dolan had a prior battery conviction and arrested him for felony battery. + +The State initially charged Mr. Dolan with five offenses, but he was convicted only of felony battery. He received a sentence of ten months' incarceration in county jail, followed by one year of community control and two years or probation. The trial court bifurcated the jury trial. The first phase of the trial concerned whether Mr. Dolan was guilty of battery. The second phase of the trial concerned whether Mr. Dolan had the requisite prior record to be convicted of felony battery. + +The issue on appeal involves only the second phase of this proceeding. During the second phase, the State presented no witnesses. It relied exclusively on what it asserted was a prior judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor battery. While the jury was deliberating on the first phase, the trial court asked the State how it intended to prove a prior conviction. The State responded that it had a certified copy of a prior judgment and sentence. The trial court observed that the document did not contain fingerprints. The court asked the State to provide legal precedent that would support the admission of a judgment that did not contain fingerprints. The State assured the court that it would find the precedent. + +After the jury returned its first verdict of guilt, the State informed the trial court that it had the certified copy of the judgment and sentence and a copy of a booking photo in its possession. But the State provided no legal precedent to support the introduction of the certified copy witho, fingerprints. Instead, the assistant state attorney stat + +> But at this time we don't have any and then well just ask for you to judicial notice of it, after ent judgment and sentence, a jury finds it to be themdefendan nd then \*265 there's a challenge from the defense, t uld 'roue with the bo photo. That's our game pl int. + +Not surprising) "game plan allow the State address the matter in a motion for judgment of acquittal. se objected to this rather odd I court advised that it would simply proceed with its evidence and then + +When the State sought to introduce the certified copy of a judgment and sentence into evidence, Mr. Dolan's attorney objected that the State had presented no evidence that the person listed in the judgment was actually the defendant. The trial court decided to "allow it into evidence" after first denying the objection, which it characterized as an objection based on "relevancy." The court added: "But, of course, if they can't show + +relevancy, I'll grant your motion for a directed judgment of acquittal as to this bifurcated portion of the trial." Once the court admitted this exhibit into evidence, the State rested. + +Recognizing that we may be Monday-morning quarterbacks, this probably would have been a good time for the trial court to allow Mr. Dolan's attorney to move for a judgment of acquittal. Instead, the trial court conducted a bench conference, asking the State how it had identified the defendant as the person n med in the prior judgment. The State responded th to take "judicial notice" of a responded: "What booking attorney, having already anted the court o. The court The assistant state + +> The online, but I have of it. It wasn't e Uzi into evidence, that's why mething that can be ned by the Court. We didn't it into evidence because we on't have the person that took the photo. But the booking photo has the case number attached to it. + +r. Dolan's attorney then objected to this entire procedure. + +The trial court never actually announced that it was going to take judicial notice of the online information from the sheriff's website. Instead, it asked, "Madam Clerk, do you have some scissors? Okay. Do you have some staples, stapler?" Mr. Dolan's attorney asked to make an argument, and the court announced that it had "already heard argument." The court then stapled a redacted copy of the online Internet material to the certified judgment. Thereafter, the State moved to reopen its case. The court asked, "But now you're resting?" Mr. Dolan's attorney responded that the State had already rested, to which the court replied, a, I'll allow them to reopen their case. I don't play those games." Mr. Dolan's attorney then moved unsuccessfully for a judgment of acquittal. + +The trial court never actually took judicial notice of any document, and the jury was not told that the court had taken judicial notice. Instead, the State argued to the jury that it should look at the booking photo and then at the defendant in the courtroom and decide if it was the same person. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the State. After sentencing, Mr. Dolan appealed his judgment and sentence. + +### II. THE HOLDING + +III The applicable felony battery statute states, in part: + +A person who has one prior conviction for battery, aggravated battery, or felony battery and who commits any second or subsequent battery commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in tenon] 775.082, s [ection] 775.083, or talon] 775.084. For purposes of this subsection, "conviction" \*266 means a determination of guilt that is the result of a plea or a trial, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld or a plea of nolo contendere is entered. + +§ 784.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2012). There can be no dispute that a prior conviction in this context is an element of t offense. See State v. Rothwell, 981 So.2d 1279, 1281 ( 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, unless the defendan a jury trial on this issue, the prior conviction issue that must be proven beyond a reaso to the jury. + +121 PI The trial court's bifurcated p mg to prevent the presentation of evidence of ppor record to the jury during the initial stage, of th trial was an entirely appropriate procedure in case. f State v. Rodriguez, 575 So.2d 1262, 12 1) (concluding that "if a defendant charged ony DUI elects to be tried by jury, the court s ct a jury trial on tut allowing of the sing! of DUI at issue without allowing the jury to lea the alleged prior DUI offenses" and that if the jury returns a guilty verdict, the trial court shall conduct a separate proceeding to determine if the defendant has the requisite prior convictions (footnote omitted)), modified by State v. Harbaugh. 754 So.2d 691, 694 (Fla.2000) (holding that unless waived by the defendant in a felony DUI case, the jury, not the judge, must decide the issue of the defendant's prior convictions in the second phase of the trial). But the odd procedure utilized by the court to introduce the prior judgment is improper. It was not the State that asked the court to + +cut and paste a copy of a redacted online document to a certified judgment. The court effectively introduced its own evidence against the defendant, thereby departing from its required position of neutrality. See Seago v. State, 23 So.3d 1269, 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Any argument that a copy of an online document, even a document from a government website, can be admitted into evidence over objection to prove an essential element of a third-degree felony without any predicate testimony to establish its authenticity or to prove the truth of its content, i.e., that it is a battery judgment involving the defendant, borders on the frivolous. See § 90.955, Fla. S 014) (relating to the admission of public records) + +141 (51 We do not be took judicial notice would have been e permits a trial court, judicial noti the circu narro (F e trial court actually mg photo. To do so case. Although case law t in a nonjury trial, to take ct essential to a criminal conviction, which this is permissible are quite Cordova v. State, 675 So.2d 632, 635 996). Booking information obtained from ebsite does not fall within the list of matters h a court must take judicial notice under section , and it does not appear to fall within the list of atters for which a court may take judicial notice under section 90.202. Even if this booking document were such information, an oral request to take judicial notice of such evidence after a party has rested its case would clearly fail to comply with the procedures of section 90.203, which addresses the circumstances requiring compulsory judicial notice of items listed in section 90.202. + +We recognize that the Fourth District allowed a trial court in a bifurcated felony DUI proceeding to take judicial notice of an entire court file that contained, among other things, a booking photograph. 2 See \*267 v. State 807 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); cf. v. State, 865 So.2d 5, 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (distinguishing Illand explaining that it "sustained a conviction fm ] even though all the required past offenses were not proven with certified copies of the judgments of conviction .... because the state supported the evidence of the defendant's DMV driving record with other reliable evidence of the conviction"). If the State had had an entire court Me from a prior misdemeanor conviction in this case, the outcome might have been different. But see Stoll v. State, 762 So.2d 870, 876 (Fla.2000) ("Although a trial court may take judicial notice of court records, it does not + +follow that this provision permits the wholesale admission of all hearsay statements contained within those court records." (citation omitted)). + +161 (7( Perhaps the assistant state attorney in this case was inexperienced. Nonetheless, while a trial court certainly has some discretion to make allowances for inexperienced or unprepared attorneys, the court does not have the discretion to dispense with basic rules of evidence or to take over the role of prosecutor. Thus, we hold that the trial court erred in admitting this odd document using these unusual procedures. The trial court should have granted a judgment of acquittal as to the felony charge when the State was unprepared to prove that the defendant was the person identified in the prior judgment. Accordingly, on remand the trial court shall enter a judgment for misdemeanor battery. + +## III. THE UNRESOLVED ISSUES + +Mr. Dolan argues that the prior judgment could not be admitted as evidence of a conviction because it did not contain fingerprints in compliance with Florida Rule \* the State Criminal Procedure 3.986. Relying on Keith v. State, So.2d 715 (Ha. 2d DCA 2003), he claims the d is thus inadmissible unless the State provides record" as described in v. State, 688 (Fla.1954). The State answered with extensively on case law that discussed prior convictions in various contexts. + +Releasee Reoffender Act, the State must only prove that the defendant and the releasee identified by the Florida Department of Corrections are one and the same person by the preponderance of the evidence and that it may do so through photographic evidence). + +Additionally, much of the related case law, including Keith, dealt with proof of a prior felony conviction, as opposed to a prior misdemeanor conviction. Rule 3.986, which provides a form judgment requiring fingerprints, on its face states that the form "shall be used by all courts." The \*268 rule, however, appears have been written to comply with chapter 75 23 ws Florida, and section 921.241, Florida Stat fingerprints to be affix reflecting guilt of a Criminal Procedure, 975), which require written judgment" ee In re Fla. Rules of 72, 172 (Fla.1975). + +Our record, y, contains no information about when the rt in Pasco County or the county courts unties began to use a form judgment t ngerprints. No one in this case argues that c legis has required fingerprints on misdemeanor Ass . comments as a matter of substantive law. Because did not attempt to comply with the proper ure rocedures for judicial notice in this case, our record tells us nothing about the nature of the public records maintained in Pasco County for prior simple battery or DUI convictions. Given that convictions for these types of offenses are some of the most common convictions to be used as substantive proof to establish subsequent felony charges, we decline to announce any rule governing the admissibility of evidence establishing the historical fact of the prior conviction at this time. Suffice it to say, if the absence of fingerprints on misdemeanor judgments has been a common, longstanding practice in Pasco County, it is a legal issue that prosecutors will need to address with care until precedent is established on this issue. + +The rules for the admits n of ndr convictions for purposes of sentencing when t e prior conviction is not an essential el determined by a jury are simply differe those applicable to this case. See Sustalcoski 2 So.2d 306, 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008 that a fingerprint match is not essential fora nviction to be used as a qualifying offense for purposes of a violent career criminal sentence); v. State. 936 So.2d 672, 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (stating that the evidence was sufficient to prove identity for the purpose of considering two prior convictions on the defendant's sentencing scoresheet despite a lack of fingerprints); Wencel v. State, 768 So.2d 494, 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that under the Prisoner + +Reversed and remanded. + +SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur. + +## All Citations + +187 So.3d 262, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D416 + +1. 1 The judgment erroneously reflected that Mr. Dolan was convicted of felony battery pursuant to section 784.041 of the Florida Statutes. +2. 2 That opinion at least suggests that the second phase of the trial was nonjury. [REDACTED] v. State, 807 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("Mark [REDACTED] timely appeals after a jury, in a bifurcated proceeding, convicted him of driving under the influence (DUI). The trial court determined the felony portion of this DUI charge."). + +End of Document + +© 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +95 So.3d 897 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. + +## NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mark W. DARRAGH, Appellee. + +No. 5D10-3188. + +June 8, 2012. + +Rehearing Denied July 10, 2012. + +#### Synopsis + +Background: Insured brought action against insurer that provided \$200,000 in uninsured motorist (UM) coverage, seeking damages arising out of automobile accident. The Circuit Court, Seminole County, Michael J. Rudisill, J., entered judgment on a \$3.99 million jury verdict in favor of insured, that included an award of future economic damages. Insurer appealed. + +Holdings: The District Court of Appeal, La that: + +[I] trial court erred in refusing to instruc C'iffy to uce its award of future economic damages to p rcalue; + +[2] insured could present t timon as op the full amount of his past medical bills; + +[3] information an pri utsr from government website concerning ex ry retirement benefits were not admissible. + +Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. + +#### Attorneys and Law Firms + +\*898 Richard A. Sherman, Sr., of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Sonya S. Wesner, of the Law Office of Patricia E. Garagorlo, Orlando, for Appellant. + +Jeffrey M. Byrd, of Jeffrey M. Byrd, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. + +#### Opinion + +LAWSON, J. + +121 131 Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company appeals from a final judgment entered following a \$3.99 million jury verdict entered in favor of Nationwide's insured, Mark W. Da gh. Nationwide provided uninsured motorist cover a the amount of \$200,000 to Darragh. We agree s wide that the trial court erred in refusing tot ct the jury to reduce future economic damages ue in rendering its verdict. See Dupuis v. r Fla. 679, 152 So. 659, 662 (1934); Florida sr C y. Co. v. Young, 104 Fla. 541, 140 So. 467 (I orida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Lassiter, 58 a 50 So. 428 (1909). Milton v. 22 So.3d 624 la. 3d DCA 2009); Howell v. 489 So (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Seaboard Court Lin v. Burt& 427 So.2d 1048, 1050 (Fla. 3d '1%•1 ), Seaboard Coast Line RR. Co. v. Garrison, 336 423, 425 (Fla. 2d DCA I976); Norman v. Mullin, 2d 733, 734 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971). Accordingly, we rse the portion \*899 of the verdict awarding future economic damages, and remand for a new trial as to future economic damages only. See, e.g., Milton, 22 So.3d at 625. We find no error in the trial court's decision to allow testimony of the full amount of Darragh's past medical bills pursuant to section 768.76, Florida Statutes (2009) and Goble v. Frohnum, 901 So.2d 830 (Fla.2005). The trial court properly treated the lesser amount negotiated for payment by Darragh's private health insurer as a collateral source set-off to be made by the judge after trial. See Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrell, 53 So.3d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). + +141 For the benefit of the parties and the trial court on retrial, we address one other evidentiary issue relating to Darragh's future economic damages claim. Over Nationwide's many and various objections, Darragh was allowed to personally testify as to the value of future pension benefits that he claims to have lost from the United States military as a result of injuries sustained in the underlying automobile accident. It appears that Darragh based this testimony exclusively on information he gleaned from websites maintained by the United States government. Copies of pages from these websitcs + +were also introduced into evidence over Nationwide's objections. We agree with Nationwide that the trial court erred in permitting this testimony and admitting printed copies of the website pages into evidence, on this record. + +The website materials attempt to simplify and explain in lay terms how one can estimate the amount of future potential military retirement benefits, with the following cautions: + +These results are based on your assumptions. The future will differ from these assumptions and actual results will differ correspondingly. Remember these results are not guaranteed; they are merely estimates. This point cannot be emphasized too heavily there is no guarantee that the assumptions will all prove correct. This is why you should "play" with the assumptions. + +The intent of this analysis is to help you to make a fairly simple and direct estimate of the financial flow resulting \*900 from your retirement and be able to investigate some of the factors that influence the result. + +Nationwide's objections to the admission of these documents at trial included a hearsay objection and an objection that the documents had not been pro authenticated. Darragh countered the hearsay ob by arguing that the website pages fell within th exception for public records and repo 90.803(8), Florida Statutes, but made lQett f to authenticate them as such. See, e.g., ackso v e Elec. Auth. v. Delft of Rev., 486 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ("Public records an rts are admissible as an exception to the hearsay tion 90.803(8), provided they are auth tcated, ion 90.901, by a custodian, sections and 90.955."); see also St. Luke's Catarac Inst., P.A. v. Sanderson, 2006 WL 13 t 4.Fla. May 12, 2006) ("Websites are not nticating. To authenticate printouts from a wcbsit the party proffering the evidence must produce 'some tatement or affidavit from someone with knowledge [of the website] ... for example [a] web or someone else with personal knowledge would be sufficient' ") (citations omitted). Darragh's argument below and on appeal also fails to recognize that section 90.803(8) limits admissibility of public records to those "setting forth the activities of the office or agency, or matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to matters which there was a duty to report...." The government website printouts admitted below do not simply set forth the activities of a government agency or matters observed pursuant to a duty to report. CI Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co., 429 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (fmding Florida Driver's Handbook did not fall under either category of public record admissible under section 90.803(8)). Accordingly, the trial court erred in admitting these website printouts under the public records exception. + +151 161 171 181 the government website informatio was admissible under section 90.202(12), which ws a court to take judicial notice of facts subject to dispute because they are capab accurate and ready determination by resort to se accuracy cannot be questioned[.]" We some of the factual tables copied from te would qualify for judicial notice under section (12). However, to rule the basic attemp the assumptio future portial moment benefits admissible pursuant to 'on 90.202(12) would be inconsistent with the nderlying our jury system. As explained in v. Maradie, 680 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Darragh alternatively argues that plain and simplify into lay terms calculations necessary to estimate + +n our justice system, the practice of taking judicial notice of adjudicative facts should be exercised with great caution. This caution arises from our belief that the taking of evidence, subject to established safeguards, is the best way to resolve disputes concerning adjudicative facts. When a matter is judicially noticed "it is taken as true without the necessity of offering evidence by the party who should ordinarily have done so." Thus, historically, "judicial notice applies to self-evident truths that no reasonable person could question, truisms that approach platitudes or banalities." + +Id. at 541 (internal citations omitted) (quoting Makers v. Prince, 64 So.2d 670, 673 (Fla.1953) and Hardy v. Johns Manville Sales Corp., 681 F.2d 334, 347 48 (5th Cir.1982)). In short, if this authoritative source can be admitted into evidence simply because the trial court can readily verify that it is an authoritative source, the \*901 same rule should apply to other authoritative sources. It does not. Rather, under our evidence code "[s]tatements of facts or opinions on a subject of ... specialized knowledge contained in a published treatise ... or other [authoritative] writing may [only] be used in cross-examination of an expert witness...." § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (2010). "Section + +90.706 does not permit statements in a learned treatise to be used as substantive evidence since the treatise would be hearsay if offered as substantive evidence." Donshik v. Sherman, 861 So.2d 53, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). "This is so because 'the opposing party cannot cross-examine and impeach the source of the hearsay.' " Duss v. 80 So.3d 358, 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (quoting In re S.&, 946 So.2d 620, 622 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)). This was one of the primary arguments that Nationwide made to the trial court, and repeated on appeal that by admitting the website information into evidence and allowing Darragh to testify from it, Nationwide had no way to test the methods, assumptions and underlying explanations for Darragh's ultimate conclusions. On this record, we agree. + +PI Finally, Darragh alternatively argues that his testimony on this issue was based upon formulas easily gleaned from federal statutes, and that the trial court properly took judicial notice of these statutes. Clearly, a trial court is authorized to take judicial notice of a federal statute. See § 90.201(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). The problem here is that we cannot find the information forming the basis of Darragh's testimony in any of the statutes Darragh cites. Although Darragh's counse argued that the website information mirrored federal I + +## Footnotes + +1 At trial, Nationwide requested that the' ns ed as to this issue using Standard Jury Instruction 6.10. The trial court declined to give the instruction after earing ment from Darragh's counsel, who believed that the case law requiring a trial court to instruct the jury to redu future economic damages to present value had been superceded by an amendment to section 768.77, Florida Statutes. af1999. See Ch. 99-225, § 7, Laws of Fla. Contrary to Darragh's argument, the requirement that a jury be common law requirement tha re-dated the enactment of section 768.77, Florida Statutes, by many decades—as can be seen from the cases cited a e dating back to 1909. Section 768.77(1) was originally enacted as part of the Tort Reform Act of 1986, see Ch. 86-160, § 56, Laws of Fla., and required the trier of fact in negligence actions to itemize its verdict into economic losses, noneconomic losses and punitive damages. Subsection two required further itemization between past and future losses, and required future economic losses to be 'computed [on the verdict form itself) before and after reduction to present value." Id. The 1999 amendment simply removed the requirement for an itemized verdict form reflecting the present value calculation. Ch. 99-225, § 7, Laws of Fla. Contrary to Darragh's argument, the legislature's decision to remove the requirement that a jury detail its present value calculation on an itemized verdict form cannot be read as abrogating the longstanding common law requirement that a jury be instructed to reduce future economic damages to present value. See, e.g., Essex Ins. Co. v. Zola, 985 So.2d 1036, 1048 (Fla.2008) ("A statute ... designed to change the common law rule must speak in dear, unequivocal terms, for the presumption is that no change in the common law is intended unless the statute is explicit in this regard.") (quoting Cathie v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm'n, 354 So.2d 362, 364 (Fla.1977)). d, upon request, to reduce future economic damages to their present value was a + +he did not provide copies of the statutes themselves only citations. And, the information is simply not readily apparent from the cited statutes. If, on remand, Darragh can locate a statute that plainly lays out a mathematical formula for calculation of his claimed retirement benefit, we would agree that Darragh could "plug the numbers" into that formula without the aid of an expert witness thus providing a basis for the jury's consideration of this element of future economic damages. But, on this record, we agree with Nationwide that simply admitting the website pages, and allowing Darr to testify from them, was improper. + +As to all other issues, we affi trial court's final judgmen rrOi jry's e verdict and the + +AFFIRMED IN P REMANDED. RSED IN PART AND + +CO d J BUS, J.J., concur. + +## lta + +.3d 897, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D1355 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eab085af4d15bb6e65afe39a5b924b7d05209895 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612/EFTA02762612.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,901 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762612.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 35874, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING \nSUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY I T OF HIS \nOBJECTION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PjAn J. \nREOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PUrS AloWTO FLORIDA STATUTES \nSECTIONS 90 D 90.203", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 390.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 390.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 279.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Synopsis", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 242.070556640625 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 242.070556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys and", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 566.83056640625 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 566.83056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opinion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 665.01 + ], + [ + 91.11088562011719, + 665.01 + ], + [ + 91.11088562011719, + 679.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 679.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. THE FACTS AND PROCEEDING \nIN CIRCUIT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 521.65966796875, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 521.65966796875, + 419.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 419.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE HOLDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 221.59556579589844, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 221.59556579589844, + 127.22406005859375 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 127.22406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. THE UNRESOLVED ISSUES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 254.33352661132812, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 254.33352661132812, + 338.5945739746094 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 338.5945739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "All Citations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 658.53 + ], + [ + 371.4032287597656, + 658.53 + ], + [ + 371.4032287597656, + 673.4745788574219 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 673.4745788574219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE \nINSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, \nv. \nMark W. DARRAGH, Appellee.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 259.70660400390625, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 259.70660400390625, + 182.070556640625 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 182.070556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Synopsis", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 284.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 284.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys and Law Firms", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 640.71 + ], + [ + 163.21368408203125, + 640.71 + ], + [ + 163.21368408203125, + 654.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 654.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opinion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 100.2816162109375 + ], + [ + 352.1108703613281, + 100.2816162109375 + ], + [ + 352.1108703613281, + 113.07049560546875 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 113.07049560546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Footnotes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 101.716796875, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 101.716796875, + 436.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 436.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "lta", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 371.070556640625 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 371.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 204 + ], + [ + "Line", + 100 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 216 + ], + [ + "Line", + 103 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 186 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 169 + ], + [ + "Line", + 81 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 214 + ], + [ + "Line", + 100 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 152 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762612" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a341f1f628d32c961b19063ef7bd1f11bf554841 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING TONJA HADDAD, P.A.'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPDATE FILE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, filed by Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad Coleman. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and having been advised of the agreement of the parties, hereby, + +ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the Motion is GRANTED. Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad Coleman are hereby discharged as co-counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in this action and are further relieved of any further obligation, duties or responsibilities in this case. + +The Clerk is directed to remove Tonja Haddad, P.A. and Tonja Haddad Coleman as counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. + +Alec DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Be 61 County, Florida this / day of November, 2017. + +> THE 1199 'OR LD W. HAFELE CIRCIAT COUR DGE + +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]*, +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order Granting Tonja Haddad, P.A.'s Motion to +Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and Directions to Clerk to +Update File +Page 2 + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], Jaffee, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
Fred Haddad, P.A.
315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
dee@fredhaddadlaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15'11Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Agreed Order Granting Tonja Haddad, P.A.'s Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and Directions to Clerk to Update File Page 3 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jeoldberceraDaewoa.com smahonevOaewna.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com Angela(alinkrocklaw.com Tinealinkrocklew.com Trowatinkrocklaw.com Tativa@linlirocklaw.com yeservice@linkrocklaw.com Sal Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5537c29edf010b9a144c020a46ddc484c47c6998 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625/EFTA02762625.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762625.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5789, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING TONJA HADDAD, P.A.'S \nMOTION TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO \nCLERK TO UPDATE FILE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 323.35699999999997 + ], + [ + 522.1743774414062, + 323.35699999999997 + ], + [ + 522.1743774414062, + 376.9690246582031 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 376.9690246582031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 209.79000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 247 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762625" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a4042f4431fffe5866b941cc113ca74151736070 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING DEMONSTRATIVE GRAPHICS USED AT N 29, 2017, HEARING + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstei "), hereby gives notice of the filing of the following demonstrative graphics whi esented to the Court at the November 29, 2017, hearing on Epstein's Revised O M ion in Liminc: + +- I. Three Different ibit A); and +- 2. Timeline (Exhi + +6S CP119ly + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 1, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# THREE DIFFERENT LAWSUITS + +![](_page_4_Diagram_198.jpeg) + +1. Plaintiff [REDACTED] starts by proving the truth of the claims he brought on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, the propriety of the discovery he pursued and the procedures he followed in the prosecution of those claims as well as the complete absence on his part of any knowledge of or participation in the Ponzi scheme. + +11/22/17; [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Revised Omnibus MIL. + +↓ + +- 1. Depositions of EW, LM, and Jane Doe +- 2. Procedural issues +- 3. Read Epstein's Fifth Amendment testimony as proof that EW, LM, and Jane Doe are telling the truth + +![](_page_4_Diagram_202.jpeg) + +![](_page_4_Diagram_203.jpeg) + +| | MALICIOUS PROSECUTION | DEFAMATION | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ELEMENTS |
  • 1) the commencement of a judicial proceeding;
  • 2) its legal causation by the present defendant against the plaintiff;
  • 3) its bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff;
  • 4) the absence of probable cause for the prosecution;1
  • 5) malice; and
  • 6) Damages.2
|
  • (1) publication;
  • (2) falsity;
  • (3) actor must act with knowledge or reckless disregard as to the falsity on a matter concerning a public official, or at least negligently on a matter concerning a private person;
  • (4) actual damages; and
  • (5) statement must be defamatory.3
| +| BURDEN OF PROOF |

Elements of Malicious Prosecution - Plaintiff must prove by greater weight; if proven; then consider defenses

One exception:
Once plaintiff submits evidence of a bona fide termination (#3), burden shifts to the defendant to rebut that the termination was bona fide4.
No other case law re burden shifting

|

Elements of Defamation - Plaintiff must prove by greater weight or clear and convincing (depending); if proven, then consider defenses

| +| DEFENSES |

None (Advice of lawyer not raised due to 5th Amendment)

(unless Motion for Leave to Amend is Granted)

|
  • (1) Truth with good motives
  • (2) Qualified privilege
  • (3) Abused qualified privilege
| + +1 Florida Standard Jury Instructions (Civil) 406.4 defines "Probable Cause" as meaning "that at the time of instituting [or continuing] a civil proceeding against another, the facts and circumstances known to Defendant [Epstein] were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding was supported by existing facts." + +2 Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So. 3d 602, 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Alamo Rent-A-Car, 632 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1994). + +3 Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So. 2d 1098, 1106 (Fla. 2008). + +4 Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1356 (Fla. 1994) + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +0 + +![](_page_6_Diagram_2.jpeg) + +# Learned Through Discovery + +MAI= - Scott Rothstein Partner/CE -Brad (Partner) - William Berger (Shareholder) - Russ Adler (Shareholde - Mart Nurik (Shareh • Matthew Weissing (Partner - Gary (Shareholder) - Steven Jaffe (Partner) -Cara Holmes (Associate) • hike Fisten (Sr. Intelligence Agent) • Barry Stone (Shareholder) - Michael Wheeik (Aasodate) - Robert Buschel (Pattsei) -Ken Jenne (Gvt. Relationi - Wayne Black (Outside Inveitige (04996;11/10/17 Deers) + +/02 • lack of proof of asset transfers gong to be thesticking Epstein to settle pant on the for a lot of money motion.'... We (01661) have nothing more on moving assets.' (073041 + +7/28/09 EL= Epstein mi Conference Is Scott RM, free -. to chat Jenne (APP. 28) 'I think we are [App. 281 very close, If we + +Jaffe and about Epstein?' + +Sirdien + +make the right moves, to being able to force + +7/29/09 0IM "I think our best bet Is to go after those dose to Epstein' (08420) + +9/29/09 Need evidence of a transfer 10/23/09 /017gel Jenne to Rothstein: 9/18/09 (Aoo. 28) + +Epstein meeting 'everyone would love for you to be there' + +NM Email: Draft EW Federal Court Complaint (01144) + +10/30/09 Rothstein provided wkh inventory of + +Epstein files (26304) + +30/14/09 Mier toMF 'I would love to fly up to Boston to cover (DershoWitzl depo' (01099) + +November 10. 2017. OtDOSItIOQ Rothstein: Was going to try cases with (338:1-6); gave up his right to the three Epstein cases to Rothstein (33&7.9; 338:17.339:7) Adler: Head of Tort Group. He was definitely Involved, but not day-today work (238:21-26L11 Berger: Attended hearings, drafted motions (262S-1S) Weissing,= Adler, Jaffe, Berger: Attended psychologist expert meeting (262:19.21). Hurt Complications of criminal documents (261:1-9) Clients: dients were never on Epstein's plane (166:10-1672 clients never had sex wkh cdebrities, dignitaries or international figures (16721-168:10) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2054f0786ab1eb3474cd29819dc49a729dfc84f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/EFTA02762628.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,453 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 12882, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.44, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Diagram_198.jpeg", + "_page_4_Diagram_202.jpeg", + "_page_4_Diagram_203.jpeg", + "_page_6_Diagram_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING \nDEMONSTRATIVE GRAPHICS USED AT N 29, 2017, HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.0654296875, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.0654296875, + 348.863037109375 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 348.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THREE DIFFERENT LAWSUITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.6, + 47.201 + ], + [ + 611.52, + 47.201 + ], + [ + 611.52, + 69.882 + ], + [ + 321.6, + 69.882 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Learned Through Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 27.215999999999998, + 426.01715087890625 + ], + [ + 45.89585876464844, + 426.01715087890625 + ], + [ + 45.89585876464844, + 582.1200000000001 + ], + [ + 27.215999999999998, + 582.1200000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Diagram", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 375 + ], + [ + "Line", + 176 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Diagram", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762628" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_198.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_198.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9b053d019cd1251704309a2c980eb9597c5007e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_198.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a8292833af85e2db544c5371f21d7202c9edf04e18228e21d9186122bef17a57 +size 51919 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_202.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_202.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..067adda5d7b2339ca3ab3dd3cbf4359114c5209b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_202.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dcf823ce37810d75a356654858ab996745c280939d54a6dbd0c9e9e999a9d935 +size 58468 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_203.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_203.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..024b51e9594e814fe19ee1060fd1a472da6a5dcc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_4_Diagram_203.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0fe5476f84d5939ffd1f93fb573662fb5093761df6b25ed8051b554e065c1bbe +size 55181 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_6_Diagram_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_6_Diagram_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ea52007072a7ed3a685aec3f6638ac3fa372525 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762628/_page_6_Diagram_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8751ca1b30ac7c55b39eb4e1e123ffc58b2e677fb73ec2364b244a1820a9e001 +size 160914 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb93043f3840ff6539bafe742cf7c5199157f234 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.md @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT Ran ISTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t t%dersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: December 7, 2017 + +TIME: 10:00 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 NT Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-C + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of Dec., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; ou are hearing or voice impaired, can 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvälida que necesita algún acomodam ara poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos ios, a que se le provea denta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse n ontacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la dta fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia q se programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del oido o d ame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim Id bezwen akomo sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat q oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin rese tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou ge 4 .., o 'u w ka patisipe nan pwosedi ye, en pwovizyon pou jwen kék éd. ndevou pou parét nan tribinal la, syon an si lé ou gen pou w parét nan pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Gw + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +fO \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..161301c870e9675b123a457e04b26fd43bad1fa3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635/EFTA02762635.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762635.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4401, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 76.084 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 76.084 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 118.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 118.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 351.47499999999997 + ], + [ + 368.4776306152344, + 351.47499999999997 + ], + [ + 368.4776306152344, + 366.863037109375 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 366.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 571.457 + ], + [ + 280.20172119140625, + 571.457 + ], + [ + 280.20172119140625, + 587.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 587.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762635" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb8bcb57dd9ac86139ccf4c5d256391115e7995b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND LIMITED REOUESTS FOR ADMISSION + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requestifor Admission, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. On November 8, 2017,`Ed'vards filed a Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to ( Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203, which asks that the Court take judicial notice of Jeffrey Epstein's New York State Sex Offender registration information. +- 2. The ilequest for Judicial Notice attached a copy of the New York State Sex 7 - Offender registraticyni information at issue, which was pulled from that state's government website. +- 3. On November 27, 2017, the Court entered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines and Re: Pretrial Stipulation, in which it ordered that wholesale additional discovery would not be permitted, but individual discovery requests may be allowed on a matter by matter basis, and only if the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's rulings on certain motions currently pending to be heard. + +4. The next day, on November 28, 2017, Epstein filed supplemental authority opposing Ms Request for Judicial Notice, which asked the Court to deny the request because "website materials [are] inadmissible hearsay" and "are not self-authenticating. To authenticate printouts from a website, a party proffering the evidence must prove some statementl'or affidavit from someone with knowledge of the website . for example a web master=or\*seone else with personal knowledge would be sufficient." Citing Nationwide Mutual,Ftretsurance Company v. Darragh, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) and St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Inst.. P.A. v. Sanderson, 2006 WL 1320242 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2006). + +5. Given this argument (made after the Court entered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Pretrial Deadlines), seeks: leave to, propound the following limited Requests for Admission to Epstein: + +- a. (I) Admit that the of your New York State Sex Offender registration page attached to Edvvards' Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes,Section 90.202 and 90.203, dated November 8, 2017, is authentic. +- b. 2) Admit that the information contained in the printout of your New York State ex Offender registration page attached to Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203, dated November 8, 2017, is accurate. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission, as well as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1st day of December, 2017. + +![]() + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J.MF, Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401-7 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Fax: Attorneys forli3effl~y Epstein + +\ - Scott J. Link. Esquire Eservice@linIcrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linlcrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstei + +Marc S. Nurik, Esqui marc®nuriklaw.co + +One E Broward Ivd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, 3301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneyslor Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..498031fc5c0b33fd0d0e7f2bbf475dcbf00c84c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639/EFTA02762639.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762639.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4291, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 116.35302734375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 116.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND LIMITED REOUESTS FOR ADMISSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.844, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 335.762 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 351.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 83.844, + 351.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.0882873535156, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.0882873535156, + 139.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 139.4730224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762639" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e980146ce81a51e658e715de17e339b9d7dacf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.md @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, CO 'S' + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT ?ORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. J. Edw d through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Second Supplement to Propose4 Instructions and Verdict Form, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. On November 9, 201 s filed his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form. +- 2. On November 14, 2017, filed his Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Rim, which added an additional proposed jury instruction based upon Federal Rule of Evidente 415 and Florida Statute Section 90.404. hereby adds the following additional proposed jury instruction, pursuant to Liabos v.liannan, 215 So. 2d 487, 489-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) (copy attached): + +In order for probable cause to exist on the part of Jeffrey Epstein, the facts known to Jeffrey Epstein must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the filing of a civil lawsuit. Where, however, it would appear to a cautious man that further investigation is justified before filing a civil lawsuit, then the failure to perform that additional investigation may form the basis to conclude that such person lacked probable cause to file the civil lawsuit. + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Second Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 2 of 3 + +- 4. further adds the following additional proposed jury instruction: + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded and does not dispute that he filed the Complaint at issue against LM, Scott Rothstein, and he continued to prosecute claims against dismissed those claims on August 16, 2012. on December 7, 2009, and until he voluntarily + +In determining what Jeffriatein's intention was at the time kek,,,,.filed and prosecuted claims against . the law presumes thatifantended the natural and probable consequences of his acts. Accorlif you find that Jeffrey Epstein filed and prosecuted false claims against wards then he is presumed to have intended to file and prosecute false , unless that presumption is rebutted by other evidence. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct co to all Counsel on the attached list, this RV da regoing was sent via E-Serve 4..2017. + +-LA C Atto ey -Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and mm c n@searcylaw.com + +rid o.: 169440 + +Pri ry E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Second Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form +Page 3 of 3 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +215 So.2d 487 + +District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. + +Beverly LIABOS, as Administratrix of the Estate of P. Liabos, Deceased, Appellant, v. + +Gale HARMAN, Robert Teates, and Publix Super Markets, Inc., Appellees. + +No. 68.5. + +Oct. 25, 1968. + +As Modified on Rehearing Nov. 27, 1968. + +Action for malicious prosecution. The Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Robert E. Willis, J., granted summary judgment for the defendant store owner and his employees and the plaintiff appealed. The District Court of Appeal, Liles, Chief Judge, held that material issue of fact as to whether employees of store had probable cause for signing affidavit charging plaintiff with issuing worthless checks precluded grant of summary judgment. + +Reversed and remanded. + +### West Hcadnotes (6) + +# 111 Malicious Prosecution + +s- Nature and Elements of\_Malicious Prosecution in General \✓ ' + +An action for4Ualicioui prosecution lies where ac,. or comma] proceeding has been co en by the defendant against the plaikt s ch proceeding terminated in favor=oLthe plaintiff, defendant did not have 'probable cause for commencing such prosecution, malice was present and plaintiff suffered damage. + +4 Cases that cite this headnote + +## 121 Malicious Prosecution + +Oa Probable Cause + +Lack of probable cause by defendant to commence original civil or criminal judicial proceeding is mixed question of law and fact in malicious prosecution action. + +2 Cases that cite this headnote + +## 131 Malicious Prosecution + +9- Probable Cause + +When facts relied on by plaintifliin malicious prosecution action to prove lackl'of probable cause on part of defendant a rilitidispute, their existence is to be determined ,by jury. + +I Cases that cite this headoott + +# 141 Malicious Pr cutio + +c'- Pr le + +Le f facts relied upon by plaintiff in osecution action to prove lack of cause is question for the trial court. + +ses that cite this headnotc + +## Malicious Prosecution + +9— Grounds in General + +"Probable cause" is a reasonable ground for suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in belief that person accused is guilty of offense with which he is charged. + +6 Cases that cite this headnote + +## 161 Judgment + +6-, Tort Cases in General + +Material issue of fact as to whether employees of store had probable cause for signing affidavit charging plaintiff with issuing worthless checks precluded grant of summary judgment in malicious prosecution action against the store owner and the employees. + +3 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### Attorneys and Law Finns + +\*487 John C. Dent, Jr., and Herb Blessing, of Lee & Blair, Sarasota, for appellant. + +David S. Yost, of Cramer, Ginsburg & Sarasota, for appellees. + +#### Opinion + +LILES, Chief Judge. + +Liabos, the deceased appellant, was arrested on warrants charging him with the crime of issuing worthless checks. The warrants were issued upon affidavits signed by appellees, Gale Harman and Robert Teates, both of whom were employed by Publix Super Markets, Inc., and both of whom were acting within the scope of their employment. Harman and Teates acted after several fellow employees visually identified Liabos as the individual who had passed a number of worthless checks in Publix stores. Neither appellee, however, \*488 was an eye-witness to the passing of the checks; both acted solely upon information given them by others and apparently overlooked or ignored certain information casting a large measure of doubt on their conclusion regarding LiabpS They investigated Liabos' reputation with the Publix store in his community, for example, and foun was considered to be both trustworthy an hon addition, they found that he was gainfull , nd considered trustworthy by his emplo er. Fu they found that he drove a different car fr that ribed to the bad check artist, and that while the culprit wore glasses, Liabos did not. + +Despite these discrepancies, appellies signed the affidavits and Liabos was arrested. Hewn allowed to post bond, but only after he was detained in the custody of the police for several hours. The following day one Jess Leland was arrested and confessed to passing the worthless checks in question, whereupon Liabos was released from bond and the charge against him was dropped. + +Appellant subsequently brought this suit for malicious prosecution against Harman, Teates, and Publix Super Markets, Inc. Appellees filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, and this appeal ensued. Thereafter Liabos died and his wife, as his administratrix, was substituted for him in this proceeding. + +The issue before us is whether the court properly granted defendant-appellees a summary judgment in light of the facts disclosed. + +Ill It is well established in Florida that an action for malicious prosection lies where the following elements concur: + +1) the commencement or continuance of an original civil or criminal judicial proceeding; + +2) its legal causation by the present defendant against the plaintiff; + +3) its bona fide termination in atl of the plaintiff; + +4) the absence of probC h r such prosecution; + +5) the presence of teal • + +6) dama plainti ng to legal standards resulting to + +/ 14/, Duval Jewelry Co. v. =, 1931, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880; Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. 1926, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623; Wilson v. O'Neal, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 101; W. Prosser, Torts s 113 (3d ed. 1964). There is no doubt, and it is not seriously disputed, that five of these elements exist in the instant case The only real controversy concerns whether or not the appellees had probable cause to institute the criminal proceedings against Liabos. + +121 131 141 It should first be noted that the lack of probable cause is a mixed question of law and fact. Cold v. Clark, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 347. That is to say, when the facts relied on to prove a lack of probable cause are in dispute, their existence is to be determined by the jury as a question of fact. Their legal effect, on the other hand, is to be determined by the court, but only after these facts are admitted or found to be true. v. Bryson, 1927, 94 Fla. 1165, 115 So. 505; Cold v. Clark,supra. + +151 Probable cause has been properly defined as: + +•A reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in the belief that the person accused is guilty of the offense with which he is charged.' + +Dunnavant v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 871, 874; see also Thompson v. Taylor, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 16, 19; Cold v. Clark, Fla.App.I965, 180 So.2d 347, 349. That is to say, in order for probable cause to exist the countenance of the situation must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the forces of a criminal proceeding. And where it would appear to a 'cautious man' that further investigation is justified before \*489 instituting that proceeding, then liability may attach for the failure to do so. + +161 Summary judgment in an analogous case was reversed in v. Food Fair Stores, North Dade, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 836. + +In the present case, a jury may well decide that further investigation was warranted by the facts. We therefore reverse the decision of the lower court and remand for action consistent with this opinion. + +PIERCE and All Citations 215 So.2d 487 End of Document O 2017 Thomson Reuters No 1S 94) C ( S e JJ., concur. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b362cd214bb7c6d0722c9ba0f7801eea09a77f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643/EFTA02762643.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,498 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762643.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 11492, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED \nJURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT ?ORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 306.81699999999995 + ], + [ + 530.80859375, + 306.81699999999995 + ], + [ + 530.80859375, + 336.10302734375 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 336.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "West Hcadnotes (6)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 150.8035430908203, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 150.8035430908203, + 450.215087890625 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 450.215087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "111 Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 188.64901733398438, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 188.64901733398438, + 486.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 486.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "121 Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 659.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 188.6558380126953, + 659.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 188.6558380126953, + 673.4676055908203 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 673.4676055908203 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "131 Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 441.0293884277344, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 441.0293884277344, + 168.5850830078125 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 168.5850830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "141 Malicious Pr cutio", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 294.5850830078125 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 294.5850830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.6493835449219, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.6493835449219, + 402.965087890625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 402.965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "161 Judgment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 389.9209899902344, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 389.9209899902344, + 539.4651031494141 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 539.4651031494141 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys and Law Finns", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 170.37741088867188, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 170.37741088867188, + 84.215087890625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 84.215087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opinion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 99.33440399169922, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 99.33440399169922, + 178.715087890625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 178.715087890625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 150 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 180 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762643" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42fac8de422a40cfae74d50c17f21c5cb0b1eddb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually. + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED +2010 JUL 3 PM 4:16 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER** + +**THIS CAUSE**, having come on before the Court upon Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Appoint Commissioner, and the Court having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is, + +**ORDERED and ADJUDGED** that said Motion be and the same is hereby granted. A commissioner shall be appointed in New York for the purpose of taking the deposition duce tecum of the Records Custodian of The New York Daily News. Said commissioner to be: Metro Attorney Service, Inc., 305 Broadway, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10007. + +**DONE and ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 3rd day of Aug, 2010. + +\_\_\_\_\_ +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +cc: Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Robert D. Critton, Jr., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, WPB, FL 33401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..570c07dfca8dc2949f96297d35dbdaff920a4068 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649/EFTA02762649.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762649.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1432, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.012, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 493.2900000000001, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 493.2900000000001, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 285.012, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.191, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 487.20000000000005, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 487.20000000000005, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 121.191, + 326.43 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762649" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..622cc326bb09cfb2fcb29308e06098e56f09c484 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.md @@ -0,0 +1,842 @@ +answe c At the November 9, 20 pre-trial hearing, the Court requested that Counter-Plaintiff J. Edwar ecifi Ily identify the discovery responses provided by Jeffrey Epstein that implicate the dment privilege. This Notice of Filing outlines the specific questions and s March 17, 2010 and January 25, 2012 deposition testimony in which Epstein raised the 13Fivilege, and which proffers for introduction at trial. This Notice of Filing further provides citations to Epstein's Answers to Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010 and + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A + +#### NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRI AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLI HE FIFTH AMENDMENT + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. this Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Implicating the Fifth Amendment', hrough undersigned counsel, hereby files is and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein rids therefor states as follows: + +#### Summary + +&#x27; At times, Epstein also raised his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights. For ease of review, simply refers to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. + +December 21, 2012, and responses to Requests for Admission dated February 26, 2013 which + +#### I. MARCH 17.2010 DEPOSITION + +# a. Page 8. Lines 11-19 + +Q. When and under what circumstances did you first meet the individual referenced by the initials L.M.? + +COS + +also proffers for introduction at trial. + +AA" + +A. Mr. Scarola, I think you are aware these questions are simply designed to have me invoke my F Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendme relation to other questions and other cases filed. But in response to your question, I'm going (to s \ ., have to invoke my right not to testify. + +# b. Page 8. lines 20-25 + +Q. Do you know the individual edi L.M., identified by the initials + +A. Mr. Scarola, a answer that qu Counsel, I'm question. -- I would like to wever, today, on advice of ave to refuse to answer that + +# c. Pages 11-12, lines 23-1 + +Q. Have you ever acknowledged in presence that you liked L.M.? + +A. Again, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +### d. Page 12. lines 2-13 + +Ai lp•Atc + +Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of Terri Becker, a court r rter present at a deposition taken by Brad a -- in a case in which the individual identified by the initials L.M. was a in Plaintiff that you knew and/or liked -- + +THE WITNESS: Again, -- + +"S C) + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. - L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +THE WITNESS: Again, I'm going to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Ant id~e fight. + +# e. Page 12. lines 15-t p , + +Q. Have you ever owl ged in the presence of Steve Jaffe tha u and/or liked L.M.? + +A. Again, la, though I'd like to answer each a one of your questions today, I'm going to have to, a advice of Counsel, invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +# f. Page 15. lines 13-19 + +Q. Okay. Well, let's -- let me rephrase the question then. Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to the FBI was true? + +A. Sir, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +g. Page 15, lines 20-24 + +Q. Was L.M.'s statement to the FBI false in any respect? + +A. Sir, at least, again, today, on advice of Counsel, Fm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 14th Amendment Right. + +h. Page 17 Line 11-16 + +LS - + +N-- Q. Did you engage -- ever enga C 'n .) xual conduct with L.M.? + +A. I would like to answe today I'm going to h ve to by the Fifth, Six sir. estion; however, my rights as provided 14thrAmendment to that question, + +i. Pa 17 lines 17-22 + +Q. Have you ever exchanged anything of value with L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +esA Co + +j. Page 17-18. lines 24-4 + +Q. Did you ever direct anyone to deliver anything of value to L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to have to refuse to answer that question based on the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +k. Page 18, lines 6-10 + +Q. Do you know Carolyn Andri + +A. At least today, sir, I'm goin refuse to testify about that quest ased on advice of Counsel, I'm going to to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendme k t Rie + +I. P + +Q. Did C yn introduce you to L.M.? + +A. Sir, respectfully, I'd like to answer that question today. As I said, I'd like to answer each and every one of your questions. However, on advice of my Counsel today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +esA Co + +m. Page I8, Line 23 through Page 19, Line 5; + +Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of any interaction between you and L.M.? + +Ai p• + +THE WITNESS: rd like to answer each and O every one of your questions here today, Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Counsel, today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +Atc + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +C ' + +n. Page 34, Line 23 through Page 35, Line 17; + +Q. Specifically what are the allegations aga' you which you contend Mr. g up. + +A. I would like to answer that , many of the files and documents that dive ted from Mr. and the Rothsteintirtn still unavailable. + +With respect to anything t,4rcan , point to today, I'm, unfortun tely, li in to have to take the Fifth Amendment c that, xth and 14th. + +0 Line 1-9 + +Q. I want to know whether when you use the phrase "gin up" and the word "crafted," which you have told us is synonymous with gin up, -- + +A. Yes. + +Q. — you mean fabricated? + +A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel, sir, and + +I've answered that question before, but if you didn't hear me the first time, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +p. Pages 36-37. lines 10-7 + +Q. What discovery proceedings did Mr. engage in which you contend form the basis for your lawsuit? + +A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. + +Q. Which various people? Who? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: For example, he Bill Clinton, strictly as a means publicity so that he and his fl fraudulently steal, craft money suspecting investors in South Flori of millions of dollars. + +?S' + +BY MR. SC A. + +Q. Who else B 11 Clinton is included in your refe • 'ous people? + +A. There people in people in California. There are ew York. + +Q. Would you name them for us, please? + +A. I'm sorty. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +COSA + +q. Page 38 lines 23-25 throu tt Page 39 lines 1-6 + +Q. I had asked you earlier whether ginned up and crafted meant fabricated and you asserted your Fifth Amendment privilege. + +Are you now telling us that there were claims against you that were fabricated by Mr. IM? + +A. I'm going to again assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. I would respond that the newspapers are very clear that the cases were fabricated. + +r. Page 39, lines 13-20 + +Q. Well, which of Mr. cases do yktc\' contend were fabricated? + +A. Again, we've requested most of information from the bankruptc e've been unable -- Mr. has not he total file, but respect to any individual, I have -- at the moment I would have to my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment claim? , cs'r. , + +s. 21-25 through Page 40. line 1 + +Q. So you II not answer questions about whether the claim on behalf of L.M. was fabricated; is that correct? + +A. I believe I've already answered that, but, if again, I'll have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +# t. Page 40, lines 2-12 + +Q. Your Complaint also makes reference to a claim on behalf of Jane Doe, referred to as Jane Doe versus Epstein, case number 08-CIV-80893, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. + +Is it your contention that the claim on behalf of Jane Doe is a fabricated claim? + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question, as well as every one of your other questions here today, today Pm going to have to assert my rights as under the Constitution of the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +## u. Page 40, lines 17-21 + +Q. Did you ever have personal contac person referred to by the name Jan S' i at lawsuit? + +A. I'm sorry, sir. Sitting here to to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth Right. \?\* going 4th Amendment + +#### v. Page ( S 2-25 i through Page 41, lines 1 -3 + +as Jane D u first meet the person referred to + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each and every one of your questions here today, at least with respect to that question, I'm going to have to assert my rights under the Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth Amendment. + +A + +Cos + +w. Page 41. lines 4-9 + +Q. Where did you first meet the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question here today, at least today on advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. COSA + +x. Page 41, lines 10-19 + +Q. How many times have you been in the physical "S C) presence of the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +A. The person referred to as Jane Doe? + +Q. Yeah. How many times have you physical presence? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least least sitting here today, Mr. Scar la, I' g ng to have to assert my Fifth Aj idmen , Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment + +y. 42 lines 3-13 + +Q. You have alleged in your Complaint that there is a claim on behalf of Jane Doe versus Epstein pending in the Federal District Court of the Southern District of Florida. + +I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that Complaint? + +A. Ah, that Jane Doc. Pm sorry. But sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, Pm going to have to refuse to answer that question based on the Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment. + +# z. Page 42. lines 13-18 + +Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with Jane Doe? + +A. Again, Mr. Scarola, sitting here today, I'm going to have to on advice of Counsel assert my Six Amendment, Fifth Amendment and 14th Amend + +#### aa. Page 42. lines 19-25 through P 1 + +Q. Your Complaint makes refer styled, E.W. versus Epstein, num r 502008CA028058XXXXMBA =a case pending in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach Co Florida + +Do you know wh + +A. Sitting he have to 14th r. Scarola, I'm going to ghts as under the Fifth, Sixth and + +## bb. Page 44. Lines 3-7 + +Q. How long have you known E.W.? + +A. Well, with respect to that question, Mr. Scarola, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights, though I'd like to answer + +every, single question you have about E.W. + +cc. Page 44. lines 8-13; + +Q. How many times have you been in the physical presence of E.W.? + +A. I'd like to answer every question about E.W. that you have today, Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Counsel, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +dd. Page 44. lines 14-20 + +Q. How old is E.W.? ALS + +A. I don't know. + +Q. How old was she when you + +A. Mr. Scarola, I'm goin ve to assert my rights under the Fi Six an 14th Amendment on advice of Counse ough ould like to answer every one of these q + +ee. Pa .44. lines 21-25 through Page 45. line 1 + +Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with E.W.? + +A. Mr. Scarola, once again, I would like to answer each one of your questions here today, but on advice of Counsel I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +ff Page 45. lines 2-7 + +S + +A. Sir, I'd like to answer every question you have about E.W.; however, today, on advice of Counsel I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with E.W.? C O + +iS 4/) 9 + +gg. Page 45. lines 8-16 + +Q. Did you ever cause any money or gi delivered to E.W.? + +A. Mr. Scarola, as I've answe questions here today regarding answer every question regardin advice of Counsel, I'm g Sixth and 14th Ame dme choose to do so, I been losing my Co ur ould like to .; however, today, on have to assert my Fifth, t because though I would tdld that if I do so, I risk entation. + +hh. Pa 45 lines 17-24 + +Q. What is the actual value that you contend the claim of E.W. against you has? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +THE WITNESS: Sir, though I'd like to answer every question about E.W. and her claims and the claims of your other people, on advice of Counsel here today, I cannot do so. I must assert my rights under the Sixth, Fifth and 14th Amendment. + +# ii. Page 46. lines I -15 + +Q. Would your answer be the same with regard to L.M. and to Jane Doe? + +MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you if your answer is the same, to invoke in full. + +THE WITNESS: With respect to, I believe, Jane Doe — and who is the other person? I'm sorry. iS 4/) 9 + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. L.M. + +A. L.M. Though I'd like to answer with respect to all three of Mr. a Tents, on advice of Counsel, at least tod I'm g mg to have to invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th endment Rights. Though I'd prefer to ansvJ question, I've been told that if I choose to do so, I i osing their representation. + +## ii. Pa 71 lines 12-17 + +Q. Is there any pending claim against you which you contend is fabricated? + +A. At least today, sir, I'm going to have to respond by asserting my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +MR. PIKE: Form, also. + +kk. Page 88. Lines 19-25 through Page 89. lines 1-2 + +Q. Did sexual assaults ever take place on a private airplane on which you were a passenger? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +THE WITNESS: At least — I would like to answer each and every one of your questions here today, Mr. Scarola. But at least today, I'm going do have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights as provided by the U.S.? s , Constitution. + +# II. Page 89. Lines 4-10. + +Q. Does a flight log kept for a p jet used by you contain the names elebrities, dignitaries or International figures? + +A. At least t going to have to respectfully to answer based on my Fifth, Sixth and 14th nt Right, though I'd like to answer that questi + +mm. Page 89. lines 19-23 + +Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +A. Though Pd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth esA Co + +and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +nn. Page 90. lines 2-7 + +Q. Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Sir, at least here today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights. + +oo. Page 91. lines 20-25 through Pa + +Q. Have you ever socialized with the presence of females under t + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At the cont malicious na this just th' today, at I 14th each and east , the typical to on of ging cases of a is partner sits in jail for of behavior, the answer is, t assert my Fifth, Sixth and t Right, though Pd like to answer one of your questions, Mr. Scarola. + +pp. Page 93. Lines 6-16; + +Q. Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +A. I'm sure, again, this question is a typical + +r OSA + +question of Mr. Rothstein scheme to defraud investors, asking questions knowing it serves no purpose or relationship relevance to their case whatsoever. + +At least today, though I'd like to answer that question, on advice of my Counsel, and only on advice of my Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +MR. PIKE: Form as well. + +qq. Page 95, lines 16-25 through Page 96. lines 1-3 + +Q. Have you ever sexually abused children? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, an upon advice of Counsel, though I'd like t that question, as well asaither o claims brought by Mr. an i r, who currently sits in jail, sir, I woul a wer those questions. But today at I t, I a e to assert my Sixth Amendment, 1 endment and Fifth Amendment Right. Thou refer to answer the question, I'm told by my 1 that if I choose to do so, which is prefe nce, I risk losing their represen + +rr. Pa 97. Lines 23-25 through Page 98, Lines 1-9; + +Q. Did you have staff members that assisted you in scheduling appointments with underage females; that is, females under the age of 18? + +A. So along with many of the other claims that the Rothstein firm crafted with malicious claims against people like me and others of a sexually charged nature in order to simply fleece investors out of millions of + +dollars in South Florida, these types of questions, though I'd like to answer today, at least this specific question, I'm going to have to assert, unfortunately, my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, though I'd prefer to answer the question. + +Co SA + +ss. Page 104. Line 3-9 through 20; + +Q. How many minors have you procured for prostitution? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, sir, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14 Amendment Right, though I pled guilty to a single minor. + +tt. Page 104 lines 11-20 + +Q. Yes, but my question 't about what you pled guilty to. I just ant t w how many minors you have procured for ostituti n. + +MR. PIKE: 3 , nd answered. + +THE : Again, at least with respect to what I've guilty to, I pled guilty to procuring a single minor. + +With respect to the rest of your question, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights as provided by my Counsel. + +uu. Page 106, Lines 7 through 10\* + +Q. I want to know whether you pled guilty because you were, in fact, guilty. + +A. I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +vv. Page 107, lines 20-25 through page 108, lines 1-6 CO SA + +Q. Have you ever coerced, induced or enticed any 4C) minor to engage in any sexual act with you? + +THE WITNESS: A typical question from + +Mr. Scarola representing Mr. and tpL % rt of Rothstein, who Scott Rothstein sits in crafting cases of a sexual nature agai South Florida, me and others, the oj be determined. However, today, th e to answer every one of his questi on a vice of Counsel, at least today, I'm gob have to assert my Fifth, Sixth an Amendment Right. + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +WW. lines 8-23 + +Q. Ho mes have you engaged in fondling underage ales? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: This is relevance here at some point? + +MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer the question. + +THE WITNESS: Again, as another one of the irrelevant questions asked of this lawsuit with respect as a client how I was abused by the Rothstein firm for his -- the practices, the abuse of the legal system, the — hopefully, the ladies and gentlemen of the jury will be able to see through some of these ridiculous questions with respect to questions that today, at least, I must take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, but I believe are obvious to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury what you're trying to do here, Mr. Scarola. + +xx. Page 109, lines 5-17 + +Q. How many times have you engaged in it lec \' sexual touching of minors? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +THE WITNESS: Again, an irr vans gTiestion to this lawsuit, stric ly as a continu empt to bring in irrelevan facts t fact of what the Rothstein firm has d • ne to o me and others in South Florida, de ding estors of millions of dollars, !mow' ha east today I'm going to have to with to that particular question assert my excuse me -- Fifth, Sixth and 14th t Rights. + +MR. SCA OLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. + +yy. Page 1 l 1 lines 3-4. 18-20 + +Q. Do you have a personal sexual preference for children? + +CO'S-A + +... Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to, unfortunately, take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +zz. Page III, lines 23-24, Page 112, lines 13-17 + +Q. Have you ever acted on a sexual preference for children? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Irrelevant. Abusive. Harassing. And not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence in this case. + +THE WITNESS: ... + +I'd like to answer all of your questions here today, Mr. Scarola, even though they're irre however, on advice of Counsel, at least going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixt Amendment Right. + +aaa. Page 112, lines 22-25 through Page 113. lines 1-8 + +Q. Your Com ge 27, paragraph 49, says that: "RRA a d th itigation team took an emotionally driven set4 volving alleged innocent, unsus nderage females and a Palm Beach billionai d sought to turn it into a gold mine," end of quote. + +Who is the Palm Beach billionaire referred to in that sentence? + +A. On advice of Counsel today, Mr. Scarola, though I would like to answer each one of your questions, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +bbb. Page 113. lines 9-25 + +Q. What is the emotionally driven set of facts to which you make reference in that sentence? + +A. It's the same set of facts that were used by the Rothstein firm to fleece unsuspecting investors out of millions of dollars, crafting, fabricating malicious cases of a sexually charged nature with no fundamental basis whatsoever, reported wildlySthle press. The U.S. Attorney has accused Mr. partner of not - excuse me -- Mr. partner sits currently in jail, pled guilty to some of these charges. There are other members of his firm under investigation forj these types of questions and fabrications. But, however, today, though I'd like to ans every one of your questions with specifi ice of Counsel Pm not going to be able to a, and respectfully decline based on my F and 14th Amendment Right. + +Q. Quote, "rat The cases b included by eac aluating and resolving the' merits, that is, facts which ble, voluntary and consensual actions =ants." + +Page j 14. e'l5 through Page 115, Line 13; + +Q. What are their names? + +A. I think the prostitutes' names were — the prostitute that you described before was L.M. With respect to the others, I'm going to have + +to claim the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +ddd. Page 115. lines 21-25 through Page 116. line 1 + +Q. Okay. So one of the people that you're referring to is L.M., who you've identified as L.M.; is that correct? + +A. With respect to that question, sir, on advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +eee. Page 116. lines 2-7 + +Q. What are the voluntary and conse by L.M. that you are referencing the + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer your questions here today, I'm ave to respectfully decline based on a f my Counsel, and have to assert my Fifth, Shand 14th Amendment Right. + +fit Page ne 15 through Page 129. Line 3 + +Q. Is filed agai to be false. mg in L.M.'s Complaint that was you in September of 2008 which you contend + +THE WITNESS: I recognize, Mr. again, the concept of attempting me to get to waive my Fifth Amendment privilege; however, in this lawsuit I've answered questions with respect to your lawsuit. And with regard to the question you just asked, I'm going to have to, unfortunately, assert + +my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. But I'm willing to listen to any other questions you may have. + +,OpAtic + +# II. JANUARY 25. 2012 DEPOSITION + +- a. Page 8. lines 9-21 + +Q Have you ever been convicted of a crime? + +Q What was the crime of which you were iS 4/) 9 convicted? + +A Yes. + +A Two counts, one soliciting prostitution, and procuring a minor for prostitution. + +Q Did you, in fact, commit those + +MR. GOLDBERGER: I can i (Fifth Amendment privilege for you o can invoke it yourself. I prefer you privilege. + +THE WITNES Amendment ing to invoke my Fifth + +- b. Page 9 lines 7-9 + +Q How many times have you solicited a minor for prostitution in the State of Florida? + +A Same answer. + +c. Page 11. line 22 through Page 12. line 7 + +Q Have you ever solicited a minor for prostitution anywhere at any time? + +A Same answer. Ai p•Atc + +Q Who is the prostitute that you solicited for prostitution with respect to the claim on which you were convicted? + +A Same answer. + +Q Who is the minor that you solicited for prostitution with respect to the claim on which yo pled guilty? + +A Same answer. + +? S' + +d. Page I2. lines 16 through P + +Q Where was it that you soli prostitution in the manner -- e matter in which you pled guilty? + +A Same answer + +Q When w ou solicited for prosti e matter in which you pled guilty? + +A Same wet + +Q Have you ever discussed your sex-related arrest or conviction with any reporter or news media representative? + +MR. KNIGHT: I'm going to instruct you not to answer the question. + +MR. SCAROLA: Well, what is it then? + +MR. KNIGHT: Well, it is harassi used -- it is being used to intim. witness. It is being used for v different reasons. And I believe improper. + +BY MR. SCARO + +Q Have you activities wit any report d your sex-related n the State of Florida with media representative? + +MR. SCAROLA: And what is the basis of that instruction? + +MR. KNIGHT: What is the basis? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +MR. KNIGHT: What does it have to do with this lawsuit? It's for no other reason other than to harass him. There are plenty of areas you can go into which are reasonable. We are here. + +MR. SCAROLA: So the objection is relevancy, is that correct? + +MR. KNIGHT: No, it goes beyond relevancy. ?s, + +MR. ICN T: Same instruction. We are going to take a quick break if we can go off the record. + +e. Page 21, lines 6-22 + +Q Were the allegations in the federal complaint on behalf of LM any different than the allegations in the state court case on behalf of LM? + +A I don't recall. + +Q Did you, in fact, engage in any sexual conduct with LM? + +A I'm sorry, but I'm sure -- the jury is going to recognize this is simply meant to harass me, and I'll have to take the Fifth Amendment since your client, Mr. is trying to overturn my prosecution agreement. + +iS 5) + +Q How many times did you engage in sexual conduct with LM? + +A I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth Amendment right again, sir. A Again I'm going to assert my righ . (si + +Q Do you know who LM is? + +#### ENERAL INTERRO ATORIES ATED SEPTEMBER 16. 2010 + +2. What's yo t estimate of the number of minor females\* with whom you have cal contact in the last 10 years, when at the time of the physical contact: + +- your genitals were exposed the genitals or breasts of the minor female were exposed +- c. the minor female was clothed only in underwear +- b. + +&quot; minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have mason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +- 3. What is your best estimate of the number of times in the last 10 years when you have had physical contact with minor females when at the time of the physical 41•Alk contact: + - a. your genitals were exposed + - b. the genitals or breasts of the minor female we + - c. the minor female was clothed only in und +- 4. What is your best estimate of the numbers Maxwell engage in sexual activity o emales? +- 5. What is the total obligation tha ncurred to date for both fees and costs (both paid and currently • g) t onnection with your representation in this lawsuit? +- 6. With regard to last ' e you engaged in sexual activity with a minor, state the following: + - a. eS the i entity of the minor (name and last known address) the date + - d. the location a description of the sexual activity +- 8. Describe in your own words all interaction you have had with the individual identified in this action as L.M., including but not limited to the dates, places, have witnessed Ghislaine + +• &quot;sexual activity" for purposes of these interrogatories means any physical contact with the genitals or exposed breasts of another person. + +participants in, witnesses to, and a description of all sexual activity involving + +L.M. + +- 9. What is the name and last known address of eery healthcare r with whom you have treated or been evaluated for any sexual diso . + +ANSWER: With regard to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 8 , the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant objects because the interrogatories 0, elevant information, are burdensome, are propounded for the purpose° SSa , ment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. + +#### IV. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPlhNSES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES DECEMBER 21. 2012 + +- 3. ur current annual income from all sources for each of the d describe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for each of ot ast 3y ears including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit shajtg part ipations, options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits r prerequisites of your employment including the dollar amount or dollar o each. f you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + - (a) The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; + - (b) The date and cost of acquisition; + - (c) The current fair market value of each such interest; + - (d) The manner in which such value was calculated. + +1. 5. As to each income tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all reported income and the separate amounts derived from each source + +2. 6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest, state: + 1. (a) The address, + 2. (b) The legal description of the property; + 3. (c) The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; + 4. (d) The date and price of acquisition; + 5. (e) Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; + 6. (f) Whether, when, and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; + 7. (g) The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; + 8. (h) The cost of any improvements made to the property since purchase; + 9. (i) The nature of your interest in the property. + 10. (j) The current fair market value of the property and a description of the manner in which that value was calculated + +3. 7. List each item and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property in which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$10,000 or which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, and as to each state: + 1. (a) The date of acquisition; + 2. (b) The cost of acquisition; + 3. (c) The current estimated fair market value; + 4. (d) The manner in which the fair market value was estimated. + +4. 8. If any of the real or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered by either a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each item of property, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document and, if so, a description of that document. + +- 9. If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + - (a) The name and address of the business; + - (b) The present book value and the present market value of your interest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the business; + - (c) A description of the manner in which the stated fair mat value was calculated. +- 10. Identify all banks, credit union and savings and loan acco ch you have an interest or right of withdrawal and for each account + - (a) Where the account is located; + - (b) The highest and lowest balance in the a nt g the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of ese terrogatories. +- 11. Identify all other assets of a value in exc t 1,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each s + - (a) The date of acquisition; + - (b) The cost of acquisition; + - (c) The current estimat value; + - (d) The means utilize4 esti e the current fair market value. +- 12. Identify all othe of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and o ea h7state: + - (a) The date bility arose; + - (b) Th ount of the liability at inception; +- (c) The s of repayment or satisfaction; (d)( The ent outstanding balance. ÷13. nm any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years ediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + - (a) the date of the calculation or estimate; + - (b) the name and address of the person or entity responsible for performing the work + - (c) the reason for performing the calculation or estimate; + - (d) the amount of net worth calculated or estimated +- 15. As to all transfers of anything of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, state: + - (a) a description of the transferred property; + +- (b) the reason for the transfer; +- (c) the value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; +- (d) the date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); +- (e) whether you received anything of value in exchange for the t sferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and t ar value of what you received; +- (f) the name and address of the recipient of each transfe + +Epstein asserted the same form objections in response to each n rrogatory, + +which raises his Fifth Amendment privilege: + +ANSWER: Objection. This Interrogatory requires t information which communicates state is 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substaiitia1 an that these statements of fact th reasonably furnish a "line the prosecute me in a criminal pr 479, 486 (1951). I cannot my financial history a Fourteenth Amend Constitution. sion of detailed financial t. Fisher v. United States, reasonable basis for concern t arc testimonial in nature and could of evidence" that could be used to See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. swers/responses to questions relating to on without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and as guaranteed by the United States + +# V. RESPONSES TO RECLP TS FOR ADMISSION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2013 + +Epstein asserted is Fi r mendment privilege to the following Requests for Admission dated Feb 2 • YYY + +- 3. A.' , ou have never publicly disputed the description of you as a billionaire. 't that you have never publicly disputed any press reports describing to you as a billionaire. +- 5. Admit that you are a billionaire. +- 6. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 5 years. +- 7. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 10 years. + +- 8. Admit that you have a reputation as being a billionaire. +- 9. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a billion dollars at times during the past 5 years. At.-.. +- 10. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded half a billion doll es during the past 5 years. +- 11. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a quart f alliNSon dollars at times during the past 5 years. +- 12. Admit that you have never paid even one pe has alleged that you engaged in impro a minor. +- 13. Admit that you have never e one day in a state or federal prison facility (as opposed to a county jai asp n shment for any sex-related crimes. Asc< tilt" , ive damages to any person who ontact with them while that person was + +Specifically, the i tIttip' ural form objection asserted by Epstein in response to each numbered + +Request for A ission as as follows: + +Obj on. Tfiis Request for Admission requires a response which tes statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U,S, 391, 410 I have substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these st ents of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a lin in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings." See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951).1 cannot provide answers/responses relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of December, 2017. + +A + +/e/ Int+ NrarnIn + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +CO ' + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsxe arc aw.com and + +mmccann©searcyla + +Primary E-Mail: ®searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denne arnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm a Boulevard + +West Pal lorida 33409 + +Phone. 1) -6300 + +Faxes (5 383-9451 + ++6s + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment + +Page 36 of 36 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d29675738adedc6a208650139e72c3d26a7f9636 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650/EFTA02762650.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1889 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762650.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 36, + "chars": 38080, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 114.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRI AND DISCOVERY \nRESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLI HE FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 530.2413940429688, + 333.281 + ], + [ + 530.2413940429688, + 362.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 362.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 458.985 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 458.985 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 473.363037109375 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 473.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. \nMARCH 17.2010 DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 411.7320251464844, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 411.7320251464844, + 221.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 221.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Page 8. Lines 11-19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 207.1143035888672, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 207.1143035888672, + 249.363037109375 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 249.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Page 8. lines 20-25", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 202.93394470214844, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 202.93394470214844, + 456.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 456.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Pages 11-12, lines 23-1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 592.11 + ], + [ + 222.88870239257812, + 592.11 + ], + [ + 222.88870239257812, + 608.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 608.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Page 12. lines 2-13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 202.61634826660156, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 202.61634826660156, + 222.363037109375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 222.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Page 12. lines 15-t p ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 232.02474975585938, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 232.02474975585938, + 498.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 498.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f. Page 15. lines 13-19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 648.0 + ], + [ + 208.98431396484375, + 648.0 + ], + [ + 208.98431396484375, + 663.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 663.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "t. Page 40, lines 2-12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 202.8608856201172, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 202.8608856201172, + 166.863037109375 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 166.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "u. Page 40, lines 17-21", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 208.23472595214844, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 208.23472595214844, + 401.60302734375 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 401.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "v. Page \n( S 2-25 i through Page 41, lines 1 -3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 338.479248046875, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 338.479248046875, + 553.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 553.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "z. Page 42. lines 13-18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 209.23423767089844, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 209.23423767089844, + 277.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 277.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "aa. Page 42. lines 19-25 through \nP 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 322.86553955078125, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 322.86553955078125, + 429.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 429.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "bb. Page 44. Lines 3-7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 621.27 + ], + [ + 201.46014404296875, + 621.27 + ], + [ + 201.46014404296875, + 636.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 636.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Page 46. lines I -15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 202.93551635742188, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 202.93551635742188, + 235.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 235.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Pa 71 lines 12-17", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 209.14212036132812, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 209.14212036132812, + 594.363037109375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 594.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Page 89. Lines 4-10.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 456.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 456.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. JANUARY 25. 2012 DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.512, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 417.3520202636719, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 417.3520202636719, + 249.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 199.512, + 249.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ENERAL INTERRO ATORIES \nATED SEPTEMBER 16. 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 535.4262084960938, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 535.4262084960938, + 484.10302734375 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 484.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPlhNSES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES \nDECEMBER 21. 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 538.0611572265625, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 538.0611572265625, + 453.1125183105469 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 453.1125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "V. RESPONSES TO RECLP TS FOR ADMISSION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 536.0283813476562, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 536.0283813476562, + 484.10302734375 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 484.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 165.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762650" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1652f4bef46adc94ab7572a4f16c49a1cdbae05c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.md @@ -0,0 +1,2846 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF IX OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF HIS NOTICE OF FILING DEP RANSCRIPT EXCERPTS AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES BY JEFFR EP N IMPLICATING THE FIFTH + +A Co's + +Counter-Plaintiff, this Appendix of Documents in SuppbrtXHfs Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by J d through undersigned counsel, hereby files em Implicating the Fifth Amendment: + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | March 17, 20 | Deposition Transcript — Jeffrey Epstein | +| 2 | Jan | 20 De sition Transcript — Jeffre E stein | +| 3 | Sept | 6, 2010 Defendant Interrogatories to Plaintiff | +| 4 | 18, 2010 | PlaintiffYCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Objections to | +| | | J. General Interrogatories dated September | +| 5 | ecember 21, 2012 | Notice of Service of Interrogatories to Counter-Defendant | +| 6 | February 25, 2013 | Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein's Amended Responses to | +| 7 | February 26, 2013 | Request for Admissions to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 8 | March 27, 2013 | PlaintiflYCounter-Defendant Epstein's Responses to Defendant | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of December, 2017. A + +/e/ Int+ NrarnIn + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +CO ' + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsx aw.com and + +tmnccann@searcyla + +Primary E-Mail: @scarcylaw.com + +Searcy Denne arnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm a Boulevard + +West Pal c lorida 33409 + +Phone. 1) -6300 + +F • 383-9451 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Appendix of Documents in Support of His Notice of Filing Deposition +Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment +Page 3 of 4 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Appendix of Documents in Support of His Notice of Filing Deposition +Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment +Page 4 of 4 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +-vs- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN +Wednesday, March 17, 2010 +10:17 a.m. - 1:27 p.m. + +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Reported By: +Sandra W. Townsend, FPR +Notary Public, State of Florida +West Palm Beach Office Job #1358 + +APPEARANCES: + +1 On behalf of the Plaintiff: + +2 MICHAEL PIKE, ESQUIRE +3 BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +4 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +5 Phone: 561.842.2820 + +6 On behalf of the Defendant [REDACTED]: +7 JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +8 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY +9 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +10 Phone: 561.686.6300 + +11 On behalf of the Defendant L.M.: +12 [REDACTED], ESQUIRE +13 [REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS, +14 & LEHRMAN, P.L. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +15 Phone: 954.524.2820 + +16 Also Present: +17 STEVEN JAFFE, ESQUIRE +18 [REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS, +19 & LEHRMAN, P.L. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +20 Phone: 954.524.2820 + +EXHIBITS + +| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION | PAGE | +|------------------|-------------|------| +| Exhibit number 1 | Eyeglasses | 133 | + +PROCEEDINGS + +1 Deposition taken before Sandra W. Townsend, Court +2 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of +3 Florida at Large, in the above cause. + +4 --- +5 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. +6 This is media number one in the videotaped +7 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein in the matter of +8 Jeffrey Epstein versus Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] +9 and L.M. + +10 Today is Wednesday, March 17, 2010 at +11 10:17 a.m. + +12 We are at the law offices of Burman, +13 Critton -- Banyan -- of Burman, Critton on Banyan +14 Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida. + +15 My name is Joe Kozak. I'm the videographer. +16 The court reporter is Sandra Townsend from Prose +17 Court Reporting Agency. + +18 Would Counsel please introduce yourselves and +19 then the court reporter will swear in the witness. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: My name is Jack Scarola. I am +21 Counsel on behalf of Brad [REDACTED] in his capacity, +22 both as Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff in this +23 action. Mr. [REDACTED] is present with me. +24 +25 + +1 MR. PIKE: Michael Pike, on behalf of the 1 answer that question. Attorney/client. 2 Plaintiff, Jeffrey E ein. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. Brad on behalf of the 3 Q. Well, didn't you just tell me that your lawyer 5 Also present, Steve Jaffe, on behalf of the 5 represent you anymore? 6 Defendant, L.M., as well. 6 MR. PIKE: That's exactly what he said, 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 8 the question. 9 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was examined 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 and testified as follows: 10 Q. Okay. So I want to know then —1 want to 11 THE WITNESS: Yes, I do. Thank you. 11 know what your lawyer told you about that. 12 MR. PIKE: Before we get started, Jack, I just 12 MR. PIKE: I'm going ton you not to 13 wanted to get on the record,1 just want to make 13 answer that question. Atto e lien. 14 sure that you received this letter that I sent to 14 MR. SCAROLA: t is ontention, 16 MR. SCAROLA: I did receive the letter. 16 made, Mr. Epste any attorney/client 17 MR. PIKE: Okay. And were still on for 17 privilege with t matter. 18 Mr. deposition, as we sit here today? 18 MR. P mention, definitely not 19 MR. SCAROLA: That's correct. 19 mine. 20 MR. PIKE: Okay. Thank you. 20 BY MR. SCA 21 DIRECT EXAMINATION 21 • 1i pstcin, who else has shared that 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 ". • you at any time over the course of the 23 Q. Please slate your full name and your current 23 I 24 residence address. 24 A Again, Mr. Scarola, I'd like to answer that 25 A. My name is Jeffrey Epstein. I'm currently 2 ion, as I'd like to answer each and ewer), one of + +4 Defendant, L.M. 4 advised you that if you answered questions he wouldn't 7 THEREUPON, 7 Mr. Scuola, and I'm instructing him not to answer 15 your office yesterday of March 16,2010. 15 obviously, that by c sta ent that he has + +1 raiding at 358 El Brillo in Palm Beach. 1 your questions here today. However, on advice of 2 Q. How long have you resided at that toe ti 2 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 3 Mr. Epstein? 3 14th Amendment Right. 4 A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel today, I'm 4 Q. Arc you a Plaintiff in a lawsuit against Scott S going to lake the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendmeot with 5 Rothstein, 1. and an individual 6 respect to that question, Mr. Scarola. 6 identified by the initials L.M.? 7 Q. Have you maintained any other residences over 7 A. Yes, sir, I am. 8 the course of the last five years? 8 Q. Who is the individual identified as L.M.? 9 A. Though I'd like to ansWe each and every one 9 A. I believe front depositions that I've read, her 10 of your questrons , respect to that 10 full name is LM. 11 question I'm goin veto assert my Constitutional 11. Q. When and under what circumstances did you 12 Rights as pro - ii I th, 14th and Sixth — 12 first meet the individual referenced by the initials 13 Fifth — sorry Ira, DA and 14th Amendment. 13 LM.? 14 Q. .p . i. ... idc with you at the El Brill° 14 A. Mr. Scarola, I think you are aware these 15 add 15 questions arc simply designed to have me invoke my Fifth 17 each and cry one of your questions here today, at 17 relation to other questions and other cases filed. 18 least with respect to that question, I'm going to have 18 But in response to your question, I'm going to 19 to assert my rights as under the Sixth, Fifth and 14th 19 have to invoke my right not to testify. 20 Amendment. 20 Q. Do you know the individual named L.M., 21 And I've been advised by Counsel, though I'd 21 identified by the initials L.M.? 22 like to answer these questions, if I do so, I risk 22 A. Mr. Scarola, at least today — I would like to 23 losing their representation. 23 answer that question; however, today, on advice of 24 Q. What did your lawyer tell you in that regard? 24 Counsel, I'm going to have to refuse to answer that 25 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 25 question. + +16 A. in, Mr. Scarola, though I'd like to answer 16 Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right in + +1 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 1 2 any other person knowing the individual identified by 2 identified by the initials L.M.? 3 the initials L.M.? 3 A. I'm going to have to refuse to answer that 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 question. 6 the question, sir? 6 J. that you knew L.M.? 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 MR. PIKE: Again, for purposes of the record, 8 Q. Yes, sir. Have you ever acknowledged in the 8 I'm instructing you to invoke the Fifth, Sixth and 9 presence of any other person knowing the individual 9 14th, rather than just simply say — 10 identified by the initials L.M.? 10 THE WITNESS: Okay. 11 MR. PIKE: Form. Also could invade 11 MR. PIKE: —1 refuse to answer. I want it 12 attorney/client. 12 to be clear for the Court that y ye invoked 13 THE WITNESS: Again, I would like to answer 13 your Fifth, Sixth and 14th. 14 that question, but today I'm going to have to 19 THE WITNESS: Fin 15 invoke my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th 15 Then on advice of , I'm going to have 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 17 BY MR. SCAROL 18 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 18 Q. Have 19 any person, other than your own lawyer, having known the 19 presence that u ilk the individual identified by the 20 individual identified by the initials L.M.? 20 initials M.? 21 MR. PIKE: Form. 21 I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth, 22 THE WITNESS: Again, I'd like to answer each 22 I Amendment Right, Mr. Scarola. 23 and every one of your questions here today, 23 you ever acknowledged in 24 Mr. Scarola: however, on advice of Counsel, at 24 y that you liked L.M.? 25 least today, I'm going to have to refuse to answer Again, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to + +J. that you knew the individual 5 THE WITNESS: Again? Sony. Can you repeat 5 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 16 Amendment Right. 16 to invoke my Fi 4th Amendment Right. e wledged in Brad + +1 that question. 3 Q. Have you ever acknowledged to — 3 Terri Becker, a court reporter present at a deposition 4 A. Excuse me. 4 taken by Brad in a — in a case in which the 5 Q. - -- 5 individual identified by the initials L.M. was a 6 A. Sir, may 1 suggest that if I sa Ire o 6 Plaintiff that you knew and/or liked -- 7 answer, that it means the Fifth, Sixth h or would 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 8 you prefer that I recite it eac ' 9 8 THE WITNESS: Again.- 9 Q. I would prefer that yo the questions. 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 that's my preference t if y going to assert a 10 Q. — L.M.? 11 privilege, I will that if you simply say that you 11 MR. PIKE: Same objection. 12 arc refusing t refusal to answer will be 12 THE WITNESS: Again, I'm going to have to 13 on the basis vari Constitutional privileges 13 assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 14 against ' ' • tion without the necessity of 14 BY MIL SCAROLA: 15 15 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 16 I ur refusal to answer is on the basis of 16 Steve Jaffe that you knew and/or liked L.M.? 17 any other 'vilege, it will be necessary for you to 17 A. Again, Mr. Scarola, though I'd like to answer 19 A. Thank you. 19 have to, at the advice of Counsel, invoke my Fifth, 20 MR. PIKE: And I'm going to instruct you, too, 20 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 21 when you do invoke, invoke the Fifth, Sixth and the 21 Q. Why arc you suing L.M.? 22 14th. 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 THE WITNESS: Yes. 23 MR. SCAROLA: Let me state for the record that 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 I don't consider a form objection to be a proper 25 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 25 objection, unless you specify the defect in the + +invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 2 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 18 identify that privilege. 18 each and every one of your questions today, I'm going to + +1 form and provide me with an opportunity to correct +2 the defect. + +3 MR. PIKE: That's fine. I believe the rules +4 provide otherwise. But, nonetheless, I stand on my +5 objection to form. + +6 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. You have to repeat +7 the question. + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +9 Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +10 MR. PIKE: Form. + +11 THE WITNESS: L.M. is part of a conspiracy +12 with Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED], creating -- +13 excuse me -- creating fraudulent cases of a +14 sexually charged nature in which the U.S. Attorney +15 has already charged the firm of Rothstein, a firm +16 of which [REDACTED] is a partner, was a +17 partner, with creating, fabricating malicious cases +18 of a sexual nature, including cases with respect to +19 me, specifically, in order to fleece unsuspecting +20 investors in South Florida out of millions of +21 dollars. + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +23 Q. What role do you contend L.M. played in that +24 conspiracy to create fraudulent cases? + +25 A. L.M.'s testimony before she met Mr. [REDACTED] + +1 was dramatically -- sworn testimony to the FBI was +2 dramatically different after she came in contact with +3 Mr. [REDACTED], where her testimony then changed to +4 sort of a hostile and had claims of -- claims never made +5 before, never made to anyone before, and allegations +6 that I've read in her Complaint that that had been +7 dramatically different from the ones she had spoken to +8 the FBI about, sir. + +9 Q. Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to +10 the FBI was true? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. + +12 THE WITNESS: Mr. Scarola, unfortunately, +13 today with respect to that question, I'm going to +14 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment +15 Right. Though I know -- I believe you know the +16 answer to that question, I can't answer the +17 question under advice of Counsel. And he's told me +18 if I chose to do so, I risk losing his +19 representation. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. What is the basis of your belief that I know +22 the answer to the question? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: You -- I believe you have seen +25 this, because you're supposed to be a decent + +1 lawyer, you've read the testimony. I would guess +2 you've read the difference in her testimony to the +3 FBI versus her testimony after she's met your +4 client and his partners, who are currently in jail. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. How does that respond to my question as to +7 whether you contend that her testimony to the FBI was +8 true or false? + +9 MR. PIKE: Form. + +10 THE WITNESS: I don't believe that was your +11 question. Will you repeat? + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Okay. Well, let's -- let me rephrase the +14 question then. + +15 Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to +16 the FBI was true? + +17 A. Sir, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm +18 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th +19 Amendment Right. + +20 Q. Was L.M.'s statement to the FBI false in any +21 respect? + +22 A. Sir, at least, again, today, on advice of +23 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +24 14th Amendment Right. + +25 Q. Was L.M.'s subsequent testimony after, + +1 according to you, she met Mr. [REDACTED] and changed her +2 testimony, true? + +3 A. Did she change her testimony? Is that -- yes, +4 her testimony was changed. + +5 Q. My question to you is: Was her testimony +6 which you contend was changed true testimony? + +7 A. Your question is not a good question. Is it +8 her testimony before or after? + +9 Q. Was the subsequent testimony given by L.M. +10 after she met Mr. [REDACTED] which you contend was +11 different from her testimony before the FBI, was the +12 subsequent testimony true or false? + +13 MR. PIKE: Form. + +14 THE WITNESS: Sir, I'm going, at least today, +15 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +16 14th Amendment Right. + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Did you ever engage in any sexual conduct with +19 L.M.? + +20 A. I would like to answer that question, but -- + +21 Q. You don't need to tell me what you'd like to +22 do, Mr. Epstein. You just need to do it, please. + +23 THE WITNESS: Please -- + +24 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, please let the witness +25 finish his response. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: That's not a response to my 1 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer each and 2 question. 2 every one of your questions here today, + +3 MR. PIKE: In your mind it may not be a 3 Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Counsel, today. 4 response. In a Judge's mind, it may be. We may 4 I'm going to have to assert my Filth, Sixth and 5 have to certify it to the Court. If such a 5 14th Amendment Right. 6 procedure even exists, we can take it up with the 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 Court. But please let the witness finish his 7 Q. Your Complaint in this action alleges that + +8 response. 8 L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her 9 THE WITNESS: Again, please? 9 alleged damages. What does that mean? + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 A. It means what it says. + +11 Q. Did you engage — ever engage in any sexual 11 Q. I don't understand it. Explain it to me. + +12 conduct with L.M.? 12 MR. PIKE: To the extent yot4 can answer that + +13 A. I would like to answer that question; however, 13 question without disclosingity\_clinversations with 14 today I'm going to have to assert my rights as provided 14 you or Mr. Crinon's conversations with you, as 15 by the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment to that question. 15 well as my work armlet:4),mi can answer the 16 sir. 16 question. + +17 Q. Have you ever exchanged anything of value with 17 THE : I `'etdiat as pan of the + +18 L.M.? 18 scheme to ra ors in South Florida out of + +19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 millions o claims of outrageous sums of + +20 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'M going to 20 . 4 were on behalf of alleged victims across 21 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment 21 , And the only way — in fact, Scott 22 Right, sir. 22 ' . , ' ' sits in jail. And what I've read in the + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 aims that I've settled cases for + +24 Q. Did you ever direct anyone to deliver anything 24 million, which is totally not true. + +25 of value to L.M.? She has made claims of serious sum of money. + +1 MR. PIKE: Form. which is outrageous. + +2 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm goi . ivEll 7 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 have to refuse to answer that question . , v 3 Q. How much have you settled claims for? + +4 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. 4 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 answer that question. + +6 Q. Do you know 6 MR. SCAROLA: And the basis of that + +7 A. At least today, sir, I'm going t o 7 instruction is? 9 of Counsel, I'm going to have my Fifth, Sixth 9 to the extent that they exist. And the terms would 10 and 14th AmendmentAiti t. 10 be confidential. + +B refuse to testify about that q n. Based on advice 8 MR. PIKE: Confidential settlement agreements, + +11 Q. Did introduce you to L.M.? 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +12 A. Sir, lylltplike to answer that 12 Q. Have you settled claims? 13 question t . As id, I'd like to answer each and 13 A. Yes, 1 have. 14 every o dons. However, on advice of my 14 Q. What is the nature of the claims you settled? 15 C m going to have to assert my Fifth, 15 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 16 Sixth • 4th Amendment Right. 16 answer that question. + +17 Q. Di. M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 any interaction between you and L.M.? 18 Q. How many claims have you settled? + +19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to + +20 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question, 20 answer that question as well. + +21 please? 21 MR. SCAROLA: What is the basis for those + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 instructions? + +23 Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 23 MR. PIKE: Confidential, as well as there is a + +24 any interaction between you and L.M.? 24 Victim's Right Statute that may — you may be 25 MR. PIKE: Form. 25 tiptoeing into the identity of - + +1 MR. SCAROLA: I'm not tiptoeing anywhere. 1 answer that question based on my Fifth Amendment, + +2 MR. PIKE: Let me finish my objection, 2 Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 3 Mr. Scarola. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 You may be tiptoeing into the identity of 4 Q. Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't 5 various alleged victims underneath the Victims 5 have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against + +6 Right Statute, as well as ongoing investigations or 6 him? 7 past investigations that have remained open with 7 MR. PIKE Form. 8 the State, as well as the Federal Government. 8 THE WITNESS: Yes, many things. 9 So in that regard, we would have to put the 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 State Attorney, as well as the Federal Government 10 Q. List them for me, please. 11 on notice that you were seeking to potentially back 11 A. He has — he has gone to the media out of, I + +12 door certain identities at this deposition. 12 believe, in an attempt to gin up t allegations. He + +13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 has contacted the media. He the media for hi.. 14 Q. Other than having allegedly given different 14 own purposes. He has brougild — he has 15 testimony before she met Mr. then given after 15 engaged in discovery procecdhs that bear no 1 6 she met Mr. IM, did L.M. do anything else that 16 relationship to any filed against me by any of his 17 forms the basis for your claim against her? 17 clients. + +18 MR. PIKE: Form. Asked and answered. 18 His 1i is he's the partner of, has been 1 9 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer that 19 accused off ng a cdcral Judge's signature. 20 question, as well as every one of your questions 20 Q. I want v what Mr. — 21 with respect to L.M. here today; however, on advice 21 IKE: One second. 22 of Counsel, at least today, Mr. Searola, I'm going 22 E TNESS: Excuse me. I'm answering. 23 to have to assert my Sixth Amendment, Fifth 23 B AROLA: 24 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 24 want to know what Mr. did. I'm not + +25 BY MR\_ SCAROLA: 2 g you about allegations concerning his law firm. + +1 Q. Did L.M. fail to do anything that she had an . 2 obligation, duty or responsibility to do — 2 that I'm going to ask you not to interrupt the + +) fr., + +MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, that's the second time 3 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 witness when he's giving a response. He is giving 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 4 a response. When he finishes his response, you can 5 Q. — that fortes the basis for your 5 go on with your next question or you can — you can 6 her? 6 elicit any sort of information you intend to elicit + +7 MR. PIKE: I apologize. Form. 7 from the witness. + +8 THE WITNESS: Agai m sorry. Has she 8 MR. SCAROLA: He's being unresponsive. 9 failed to do? Can you 9 MR. PIKE: No, that's your contention. + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 MR. SCAROLA: No, that's a fact. + +11 Q. Yes, sir. s are generally based, civil 11 MR. PIKE: And you can take it up with a 12 lawsuits are on a claim that someone has 12 Judge. And if we want to continue going back and 13 done cy shouldn't have done or failed 13 forth and bantering, not allowing the witness to + +14 to do so y should have done. 14 answer the question — we're here for you today, 17 privilege' refusing to answer that question. 17 witness and interrupt the witness, I will adjourn 18 I'm now attempting to find out whether L.M. 18 the deposition. This is not proper and we 19 failed to do something that she should have done that 19 certainly can take it up with the Judge. So that's + +15 u whether L.M. did anything that she 15 for you to ask the questions and for you to get 16 shouldn • ye done and you asserted a Fifth Amendment 16 answers. But if you continue to banter with the + +20 forms the basis of your claims against her. 20 the second warning, Mr. Scarola. Please — + +21 Did L.M. do anything that she should have done 21 MR. SCAROLA: How many do I get? 22 that forms the basis of your claims against hcr? 22 MR. PIKE: I'm not sure yet today. + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. + +24 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, at least 24 MR. PIKE: Okay? 25 today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to 25 MR. SCAROLA: Good. Then let's move on. + +1 MR. PIKE: But I can tell you one thing: On a 1 witness' testimony as well. 2 professional nature, just because you are 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 interrupting the witness and bantering with me, l 3 Q. Do you understand the question that you're 4 will adjourn the deposition. 4 supposed to be answering? 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 MR. PIKE: Well, let's go ahead and repeat it. 6 Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt 6 MR. SCAROLA: No, let's get an — let's get an 7 to, quote, gin up, unquote, thcsc allegations and 7 answer to that question. 8 engaged in what you contend to be irrelevant discovery 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 that forms the basis for this lawsuit? 10 to be answering? 11 A. Mr. MI, personally, engaged with his 11 A. When — 12 partners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail 12 MR. PIKE: I'm confused. ait one second. 13 cell, potentially for the rest of his life, he shared 13 THE WITNESS: Sony 14 information, what I've been told and — excuse me -- 14 MR. PIKE: I'm conf as t question is 15 what I've read in the newspapers, 13 boxes of 15 on the table. 1 6 information that had my name on it, with other attorneys 16 MR. SCARO . your deposition is 17 at his firm. 17 being taken, con is relevant and 18 He counseled his clients to maintain a 18 material. 19 position alleging multi-million dollar damages in order 19 MR. P Ri I. And it's — 20 for them to scam local investors out of millions of 20 MR. S : When Mr. — excuse 21 dollars. 21 — t Mr. Epstein's deposition is being taken. 22 He and his — many of his other partners 22 I • n ed with whether he understands the 23 already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S. 23 being asked. 24 Attorney have been accused by the U.S. Attorney of 24 PIKE Right. So... 25 running a criminal enterprise. 2 R. SCAROLA: + +9 proceedings, what else did Mr. personally, do 9 Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed ".. + +1 Q. Anything else? 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 2 to be answering, Mr. Epstein? 3 THE WITNESS: Not I can think o 3 MR. PIKE: And I'm going to instruct you not 4 moment. 4 to answer that question right now because as your 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Counsel I cannot let you answer that question until 6 Q. Okay. What media did Mr go to? 6 I understand what question is on the table. 7 A. I am aware of at least the D ws in New 7 There's been a lot of bantering back and 8 York City. 8 forth, so, Mr. Scarola, if you would respectfully 9 I have been told by o ple that there 9 repeat the question and then you may be able to ask 10 were other media, local medi 10 him whether or not he understands the question. :1 I've been told that the — his investigator 11 But I cannot allow him to answer a question that I :2 was sent to California to harass people representing 12 don't understand is on the table. 13 his — Bra investigator — representing 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 fictitio ntly that he was a FBI agent to 14 Q. What does an investigator going to California 15 try formation for Mr. claims. 15 have to do with Mr. allegedly going to the med Li 16 Q. that have something to do with going to 16 in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these 17 the medi 17 allegations? 18 MR. PIKE Form. 18 MR. PIKE: Please answer the question. L 9 THE WITNESS: I've answered your question. 19 THE WITNESS: Good. It's part of Mr. 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 scheme to involve people who have nothing to,:,, 21 Q. Does the investigator going to California to 21 with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back 22 do something have something to do with the media? 22 to the media and gin up his stories and make false 2 3 A. I believe I've also told that you that he's 23 allegations of people that have sexually charged 24 gone to the Daily News, sir, is that correct? 24 nature cases in order to attempt to fleece 25 MR. PIKE Form. Mischaracterizes the 25 investors, local investors out of millions of + +Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed + +1 dollars. 1 A. I don't recall with specificity. 2 His firm has been accused by the U.S. Attorney 2 Q. Well, do you recall in any degree how many 3 of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators. 3 there were? 4 by illegal wire taps, by illegal methods of 4 A. I would say, probably five to ten. 6 generate cases. 6 place that you can't — the identity of whose 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 participants you can't remember? 8 Q. When did Mr. go to the Daily News? 8 MR. PIKE: So we're clear, within the last 9 A. I don't know. 9 year — correct? — timewise? 10 Q. How did he go to the Daily News? 10 MR. SCAROLA: Well, that's what your client 11 A. I don't know. 11 said. I don't believe a word he says, but that's 12 Q. What did he sit, Daily News? 12 what he said. 13 A. I believe Mr. knows that. I don't 13 MR. PIKE: Form. Ob' ti . Overbroad. 14 know exactly what he said. 14 THE WITNESS: s 15 Q. What is the source of your information that he 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 16 went to the Daily News at all, ever? 16 Q. Yes, sir. Where did these conversations with 17 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that 17 these five to ten place whose identity you 18 question without violating any attorney/client 18 19 privileges, you can answer the questions. 19 MR. P •F 20 THE WITNESS: It's attorney/client 20 THE S: On the telephone. 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 BY ROLA: 22 Q. You said you were told by other people that he 22 initiated the phone calls? 23 went to other media representatives? 23 , these questions, I have no —I don't 24 A. Yes, sir. 24 y recollection. + +5 eavesdropping in order to go to the media and 5 Q. Where were you when these conversations took a peoec can't remern . 25 Q. Who are the other people that told you that? 2 Did the people who were on the phone identity + +- A. I don't recall at the moment. themselves or were these anonymous callers? 2 Q. What did these other who you don' 777 2 MR. PIKE: Form 4 media representatives besides the Daily N 4 I don't recall with specificity. 5 A. Again, the question again? 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q. What did these other people to 6 Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly 7 Mr. did with respect to going media? 7 communicate to the Daily News to, quote, gin up these 8 MR. PIKE: Form. 8 allegations. unquote? :0 gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm 10 quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred 11 could generate profits, falsely taking in 11 to as Mr. statements. : 2 investors, creating liaise stories to the local 12 MR. SCAROLA: Would you read the question : 3 medias a taking statements to local press 13 back, please, Sandy? :4 reg made by his clients in order 14 (Pending question was read.) :5 stein, who currently sits in jail, 15 MR. PIKE: Did he answer your question? :6 could fraud, along with his other partners of his 16 MR. SCAROLA: No. :7 firm, I I Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of 17 Ma PIKE: Are you asking him again? :8 millions of dollars. 18 THE WITNESS: So you're asking the question :9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 again? 2- 0 Q. When did these other people whose identity you 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 can't remember tell you these things that Brad 21 Q. Yes. 22 did? 22 THE WITNESS: Sony. Could you repeat the 23 A. Sometime in the past year. 23 question again? 24 Q. How many °the/lily= there who told you 24 (Pending question was read.) 25 these things about Mr. . 25 THE WITNESS: He alleged that third parties + +3 remember tell you Mr. did with res to 3 THE WITNESS: Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola. 9 THE WITNESS: Mr. Gent to the media to 9 A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. — not + +1 had already been involved in some allegations to do 1 of the files and documents that we've requested from mendment and 14th 20 based on cases that didn't exist or alleged cases 20 Sixth 14th Amendment Right to remain 21 that I had settled. 21 sit hat you mean when you use the words "gin + +2 with sexual misconduct 2 Mr. and the Rothstein firm are still 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 unavailable. 4 Q. Which third parties? 4 With respect to anything that I can point to 5 A. I don't recall sitting here today. 5 today, I'm, unfortunately, going to have to take the 6 Q. Involved how? 6 Fifth Amendment on that, Sixth and 14th. 7 MR. PIKE: Font 7 Q. You seemed to be defining ginned up as 8 THE WITNESS: If I recall with specificity, if 8 crafted; is that correct? 9 I had the articles in front of me, I would be able 9 A. That's correct. :0 to recall. Maybe next time. 10 Q. Does ginned up or crafted mean fabricated? 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: 11 MR. PIKE: Font 12 Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean? 1.2 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry, r. Scarola. I 13 MR. PIKE: Form. 13 understand that you arc tryi to k door your 14 THE WITNESS: It means craft allegations of 14 way into a waiver of m t. But 15 multi-million dollar cases; in fact, alleging in 15 respect to that questi mg o have assert 16 L.M.'s case damages of S50-million, settlements in 16 my Fifth 17 order for Scou Rothstein and the rest of 17 Amendment • . 18 Mr. partners to fleece unsuspecting 18 BY MR. SC 19 investors out of millions and millions of dollars 19 Q. So yo a-' !ng your Fifth Amendment. 22 Can I take a break? 22 et is that correct? 23 VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record, 10:50. 23 't believe that was your question. 24 (Brief recess.) 24 es, sir, that's exactly my question. 25 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now on video record at Would you repeat the question for me? + +777 + +1. 10:57 a.m. Q. I want to know whether when you use the phrase 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: n 7 2 "gin up" and the word "crafted," which you have told us 11 have been brought; ginned up, meaning, crafted, 11 Mr. engage in which you contend form the basi. + +3 Q. Was your reference to, quote, gin u h 3 is synonymous with gin up, -- 4 allegations, unquote, a reference to alle made 4 A. Yes. 5 against you? 5 Q. — you mean fabricated? 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 6 A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel, sir, and 7 THE WITNESS: As part of conspiracy 7 I've answered that question before, but if you didn't 8 of the Rothstein firm an 8 hear me the first time, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth 9 participation in it, it has ed that many 9 and 14th Amendment Right. 10 casts were fraudutently bra ht — alleged that 10 Q. What specific discovery proceedings did 12 multi-mill dollar numbers put on cases in order 12 for your lawsuit? 13 to fleece vest() , where his partner, Scott 13 A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my 14 R ly sits in jail for just those 14 attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with 15 r. Scarola. 15 any of his clients or these lawsuits. 16 BY MR. CAROLA: 16 Q. Which various people? Who? 17 Q. M question to you is: Did the reference to, 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 18 quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations 18 THE WITNESS: For example, he tried to depose 19 against you? 19 Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of getting 20 A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. 20 publicity so that he and his fine could 21 And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper 21 fraudulently steal, craft money from unsuspecting 22 reports. 22 investors in South Florida out of millions of 23 Q. Specifically what arc the against 23 dollars. 24 you which you contend Mr. ginned up? 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 25 A. I would like to answer that question. A, many 25 Q. Who else besides Bill Clinton is included in + +1. your reference to various people? 1 Are you now telling us that there were claims 2 A. There arc people in California. There arc 2 against you that were fabricated by Mr. 3 people in New York. 3 A. I'm going to again assert my Fifth, Sixth and 4 Q. Would you name them for us, please? 4 14th Amendment Right, sir. 5 A. I'm sorry. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, 5 I would respond that the newspapers are very 6 rm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth 6 clear that the cases were fabricated. 7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 7 Q. Which newspaper said which case was 8 Q. Let's then talk about Bill Clinton, by whom I 8 fabricated? 9 assume you mean Conner President Clinton; is that 9 A. Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were 10 correct? 10 fabricated, to my best recollection. 11 A. That's correct. 11 The Scherer Complaint alleged many fabricated 12 Q. All right. Do you know former President 12 cases, sir. 13 Clinton personally? 13 Q. Well, which of Mr. cases do you 14 A. I'm sorry. As I sit here today, though I'd 14 contend were fabricated? 15 like to answer that question, on advice of my Counsel, 15 A. Again, we've •= fthc — 1 6 at least today, I'm going to have to take the Fifth. 16 information from trustee. We've been 17 Sixth and 14th Amendment. 17 unable — Mr. has given us the total file, 18 Q. You said something about Mr. sharing 18 but aspect to I would have — at the 19 13 boxes of information with somebody -- 19 moment I wo d hay- to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 20 A. Yes. 20 Amendment c r. 21 Q. — as forming part of the basis for your 21 u will not answer questions about whether 22 lawsuit against Mr. correct? 22 c • half of L.M. was fabricated; is that 23 A. Correct. 23 24 Q. All right. With whom did Mr. 24 believe I've already answered that, but, if 25 these 13 boxes of information? 2 rit have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +Page 3 \ Page -I 4 sir, of being a criminal enterprise. 4 Epstein, case number 08-C1V-80893, a case pending in the 19 20 A. I'm sorry, sir. Sitting here today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment + +1 A. It has been reported in the Scherer Complaint 1 Amendment Right. sir. 2 that he shared those boxes with the partners of If 2 Q. Your Complaint also makes reference to a claim 3 that was then formally accused by the U.S. A 3 on behalf of Jane Doe, referred to as Jane Doe versus 5 MR. PIKE: And just for pu — ) 5 United States District Court for the Southern District 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 of Florida. 7 Q. Do you remember my question 7 Is it your contention that the claim on behalf 8 A. You asked me who he it with? 8 of lane Doe is a fabricated claim? 9 Q. Yes. 9 A. Sr, though I'd like to answer that question, 10 A. The partners o fur, . 10 as well as every one of your other questions here today. 11 Q. Ogr o l the basis of your lawsuit is 11 today Iln going to have to assert my rights as under the 12 that Mr. allo''ed members of his own law firm to 12 Constitution of the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. 13 see 13 =formation; is that correct? 13 Q. Do you know the real name of the person 14 A. No, that's not correct. My claim is that the 14 referred to as Jane Doe in that case? 15 13 boxes ofinfonnation that were shown to investors by 15 A. I don't know which — I'm sorry, sir. I do 16 Mr. partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by 16 not, sitting here today. 17 the press c tain multiple cases, fraudulently — and if 17 Q. Did you ever have personal contact with the 18 you like the word — fabricated in order to fleece 18 person referred to by the name Jane Doe in that lawsuit? 19 20 investors out of smo eni. The 13 boxes were shared with investors, Mr. Mr. partners and some 21 of those partners currently under inditement, the others 21 Right. 22 already sitting in jail. 22 Q. When did you first meet the person referred to 23 Q. I had asked you earlier whether ginned up and 23 as Jane Doe? 24 crafted meant fabricated and you asserted your Fifth 24 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each and every 25 Amendment privilege. 25 one of your questions here today, at least with respect + +1 to that question, I'm going to have to assert my rights +2 under the Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth +3 Amendment. + +4 Q. Where did you first meet the person referred +5 to as Jane Doe? + +6 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question +7 here today, at least today on advice of Counsel, I'm +8 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth +9 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +10 Q. How many times have you been in the physical +11 presence of the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +12 A. The person referred to as Jane Doe? + +13 Q. Yeah. How many times have you been in her +14 physical presence? + +15 MR. PIKE: Form. + +16 THE WITNESS: At least -- at least sitting +17 here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to +18 assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th +19 Amendment Right. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with +22 Jane Doe? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: Now, for this purposes, you're +25 assuming this Jane Doe is somebody I know? I don't + +1 think so, since this question makes no sense to me. +2 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +3 Q. You have alleged in your Complaint that there +4 is a claim on behalf of Jane Doe versus Epstein pending +5 in the Federal District Court of the Southern District +6 of Florida. + +7 I would like to know whether you ever had any +8 physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe +9 in that Complaint? + +10 A. Ah, that Jane Doe. I'm sorry. But sitting +11 here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to +12 answer that question based on the Fifth Amendment, Sixth +13 Amendment and 14th Amendment. + +14 Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with +15 Jane Doe? + +16 A. Again, Mr. Scarola, sitting here today, I'm +17 going to have to on advice of Counsel assert my Sixth +18 Amendment, Fifth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +19 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a case +20 styled, E.W. versus Epstein, case number +21 502008CA028058XXXXXMBAB, a case pending in the Circuit +22 Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. + +23 Do you know who E.W. is? + +24 A. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to +25 have to assert my rights as under the Fifth, Sixth and + +1 14th Amendment. + +2 Q. Have you ever learned the real name of E.W.? +3 A. Yes, sir. + +4 Q. Did that person whose real name you learned +5 ever spend any time in your physical presence? + +6 A. Sir, at least sitting here today, I would like +7 to answer each and every one of your questions regarding +8 your E.W. and -- are we not allowed to use the names of +9 these people, sir? + +10 MR. PIKE: In the past -- in the past cases +11 the names of these individuals have been utilized +12 for deposition purposes. + +13 Brad [REDACTED], sitting here today, knows that +14 we have used; however, any documents that are filed +15 with the Court will redact those names. + +16 So the answer to the question is, yes, for +17 purposes of this deposition, to the extent you know +18 the names of individuals, you can utilize them with +19 agreement of Mr. [REDACTED]. + +20 MR. [REDACTED]: I have no problem with that. +21 THE WITNESS: I think to avoid confusion, so +22 there's not -- I know who you're talking about. +23 That's all. + +24 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +25 Q. What is the real name of the person referred + +1 to as E.W.? + +2 A. I believe it is E.W. + +3 Q. How long have you known E.W.? + +4 A. Well, with respect to that question, +5 Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth +6 and 14th Amendment Rights, though I'd like to answer +7 every, single question you have about E.W. + +8 Q. How many times have you been in the physical +9 presence of E.W.? + +10 A. I'd like to answer every question about E.W. +11 that you have today, Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of +12 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +13 14th Amendment Right. + +14 Q. How old is E.W.? + +15 A. I don't know. + +16 Q. How old was she when you met her? + +17 A. Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my +18 rights under the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment on +19 advice of Counsel, though I would like to answer every +20 one of these questions. + +21 Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with +22 E.W.? + +23 A. Mr. Scarola, once again, I would like to +24 answer each one of your questions here today, but on +25 advice of Counsel I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, + +1 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 1 the course of this deposition, which you allege fonn the 2 Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with 2 basis for your claim against Mr. 3 E.W.? 3 Is it your contention that among those thing, 4 A. Sir, I'd like to answer every question you 4 Mr. did that forth the basis for your lawsuit is 5 have about E.W.; however, today, on advice of Counsel 5 to have counseled his clients to make multi-million 6 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, sixth and 14th 6 dollar claims against you? 7 Amendment Right 7 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 9 delivered to E.W.? 9 that the claims purported to have been made by the 10 A. Mr. Scarola, as I've answered most of your 10 Rothstein firm and its partners allege 11 questions here today regarding E.W., I would like to 11 multi-million dollar claims where no claims exist. 12 answer every question regarding E.W.; however, today, on 12 However, i t specifically my claim 13 advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, 13 today, I'm going to have as ifth, Sixth and 14 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right because though I would 14 14th Amendment Right. 15 choose to do so, I've been told that if I do so, I risk 15 MR. PIKE: Also, th on nuscharacterizes 16 losing my Counsel's representation. 16 the witness' t 17 Q. What is the actual value that you contend the 17 BY MR. SCAROL 18 claim of E.W. against you has? 18 Q. By whom was employed when he 19 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. 19 initiated litigation against you? 20 THE WITNESS: Sir, though I'd like to answer 20 A. I uld like Micnow the answer to that 21 every question about E.W. and her claims and the 21 qu 22 claims of your other people, on advice of Counsel 22 . answer to that question is, I don't 23 here today, I cannot do so. 1 must assert my 23 24 rights under the Sixth, Fifth and 14th Amendment. 24 would like — 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: . Correct? + +8 Q. Did you ever cause any money or gifts to be 8 11lE WITNESS: What the newspapers have said is + +1 Page 4 Q. Would your answer be the same with regard to 2 L.M. and to Jane Doc? 2 like to know. 3 4 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you answer is the same, to invoke in full. S THE WITNESS: With respect ant 5 employed at the time that he initiated litigation 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 A. I'd have no way of knowing the answer to that 8 Q. L.M. 8 question, sir. 9 A. L.M. Though I'd like r your claims 9 Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against 10 with icspy,t to all f Mr. clients, on 10 Mr. which you contend form the basis of this 11 advice of Counsel t t today, I'm going to have to 11 lawsuit is something having to do with sending an 12 invoke my Fi th 4th Amendment Rights. 12 investigator to California. 13 Though I'd swer the question, I've been told 13 Would you tell rte, p\*lease, more specifically 14 that if I I risk losing their 14 what it is that Mr. did with regard to sending 15 15 an investigator to California which you contend 16 Q. those items listed by you as wrongdoing 16 justifies a legal claim against Mr. 17 on the of Mr. foming the basis for this 17 MIL PIKE: Form. And also mischaracteriyes 18 lawsuit is that he, quote, counseled his clients to make 18 the witness' testimony. 19 multi-million dollar claims against you; is that 19 THE WITNESS: Reported widely in the 20 correct? 20 newspapers is the use of illegal activities, wire 21 MR. PIKE: Form. Document speaks for itself. 21 taps, and methods by the Rothstein firm while 22 THE WITNESS: Document speaks for itself. 22 Mr. had basically been bringing these 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 casts. 24 Q. I'm not asking about a document I'm asking 24 The investigator, Mr. Piston, who's mentioned 25 you about the list of wrongdoing that you gave us during 25 in the Complaint, represented himself as an FBI + +A. No. I answered that question, which is, I'd 3 4 Q. Yes. But that isn't an answer to myita.n. My question is: By whom was Mr. 6 Doc — and who is the other perso 6 against you? Do you know the answer to that question'? + +1 agent, falsely represented himself as an FBI agent. 1 methods. Mr. Sakowitz, who was approached as an 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a Complaint, 3 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of anything 3 alleges similar activities. But personal knowledge 4 that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was in California? 4 myself, sir, no. 5 MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer 5 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 6 that question without disclosing my conversation or 6 was ever involved in obstructions of 7 my firm's conversation or any of your attorneys' 7 justice? 8 conversations with you, you can answer the 8 MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer 9 question. 9 that question without disclosing any 10 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. Based on 10 attorney/client communications with any of your 11 attomey/client privilege, I can't answer. 11 attorneys, you can answer that question. 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 12 THE WITNESS: It's attom client privilege, 13 Q. Is it your contention that Mr. was 13 Pm afraid. 14 involved in an illegal wire tap? 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: 15 A. It was widely reported in the newspaper -- 15 Q. Do you have any I knowledge that 16 Q. Pm not asking it was reported -- 16 w ' in any actionable 17 A. Excuse me. 17 frauds? 18 Q. — in the newspaper. 18 MR. P : me instruction, with any 19 A. Excuse mc. 19 of your la as. 20 Q. I want to know whether your contention is that 20 : Yes. Outside of the newspaper,. 21 Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap. 21 ich excused his firm of a monstrous fraud. 22 MR. PIKE: Try once again to answer that 22 to be the largest fraud in South 23 question. 23 s history, accused by the U.S. Attorney 24 THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the 24 re his partner sits in jail — excuse me — 25 newspaper that his firm and his partners were ported in the newspapers of boxes of material on + +Page 5 1 involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the 2 former FBI and law enforcement officials in 7 2 allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot 3 to fabricate cases of a sexually charged na 3 answer that question because of attorney/client 4 against me and others. 4 privilege. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q. Do you have any personal ledge 1 6 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 7 Mr. ever having engaged in a I wire tap? 7 was involved in any egregious civil 8 A. I have no personal kn e; however, what I 8 litigation abuses? 9 read in the newspapers and is ' posed is that 9 MR. PIKE: Form. Confusing. 10 his rum, and I believ Sako ' went to the FBI 10 THE WITNESS: It's widely reported in the 11 after he was told tinn was engaged in illegal 11 newspaper that Mr. MI' firm engaged in 12 wire taps and Ili e engaged in illegal wire 12 discovery processes, illegal activities, illegal 13 taps. 13 eavesdropping in order to fleece unsuspecting 14 The FBI. the U. . Attorney has accused his 14 investors in South Florida out of millions in 15 firm of RICO, being the largest criminal fraud 15 dollars by crafting, fabricating malicious cases of 16 enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in 16 a sexually charged nature in order to perpetrate a 17 illegal wire taps. But the answer specifically to your 17 fraud. 18 question about personal knowledge, sir, no. 18 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of 19 Dic.tave any personal knowledge that 20 Mr. ever having been involved in any illegal or 20 21 improper eavesdropping? 21 Opinions? 22 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers in 22 A. It's attorney/client privilege. 23 South Florida that Mr. firm, his partners were 23 any personal knowledge that 24 involved in illegal wire taps, illegal fact gathering, 24 25 using what the newspapers quoted as sophisticated 25 non-existing Epstein settlements? + +) fr.. Page . ... ever forged Federal Court Orders ands o: ..Di.ltave was ever involved in the marketing of + +1. MR. PIKE: Same instruction. 1 justice systems in South Florida? 2 THE WITNESS: Fm sorry. I would like to 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 answer that question, but on attorney/client 3 Same instruction with regard to 4 privilege I cannot today. 4 attorney/client. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 THE WITNESS: Yes. Arc you suggesting that 6 Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were 6 anyone who told me specifically or things that I 7 subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics. 7 might have read that specifically relate to him, is 8 Other than those matters previously referred 8 not what you've been asking me for? 9 to in carliesinegions, is it your contention that 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 1 0 had any personal involvement in any 10 Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly right. 11 other, quote, abusive investigatory tactics? 11 A. You told me if I hear something, that's not 12 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 personal knowledge. 13 THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the 13 Q. Not if you hear it from y else. 14 newspapers that Mr. firm was engaged in 14 A. Who else would I t ides 15 widely — wildly abusive practices throughout the 15 somebody else, sir? 16 State of Florida in order to fleece unsuspecting 16 Q. Well, if you ly yourself. 17 investors out of millions of dollars. 17 A. From who? 18 The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleges his firm 18 Q. Ma 19 engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. 19 A. Uh-h Is t19t the only person, sir? 20 Mr. Schemes Complaint alleges monstrous 20 Q. That's person, that's correct. 21 amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. 21 . If it's the only person, separate from 22 I have no personal knowledge, separate from 22 • /cli t privilege, I cannot answer that. 24 regarding Mr. 24 ' is lawsuit to, quote, "vindicate the 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 orking and honest lawyers and their clients who + +23 the attorney/client information, 23 . Complaint makes reference to a purpose i n + +Page 5 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 2 ever filed legal papers that w 7 2 subject of this Complaint," unquote. 4 MR. PUCE: I'm going to object to foA 4 that you are seeking to vindicate? 5 And to the extent you can answ that 1 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 7 communications with any of your a I'm 7 arc you referring to? 8 going to allow you to an t question. 8 MR. SCAROLA: Page 2. 9 THE WITNESS: I'm a n ttomey/client 9 MR. PIKE: Give me one second. 10 privilege. 10 THE WITNESS: Can we go off the record just 11 BY MR. SCARO : 11 fora second? 12 Do y nal knowledge that 12 MR. PIKE: If it's okay with Mr. -- 13 Mr. involved in any conduct that, 13 THE WITNESS: It's a bathroom break. 14 quote, c core values of both State and 14 MR. PIKE: There's a question pending and 15 F • tents in South Florida? 15 usually — 16 PIKE: Form. 16 THE WITNESS: Sorry. 17 THE 5: Can you just ask — can you 17 MR. PIKE: Just give me a second. 18 define for me what you mean by "personal 18 Okay. 19 knowledge," sill 19 THE WITNESS: Where is it? 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 MR. PIKE: It's page 2 of the Complaint, which 21 Q. Yes. Did you ever set, hear, smell, taste, or 21 has my notes on it down here, the last sentence. 22 touch anything that communicated to you directly and not 22 And to the extent that you have knowledge and 23 diroui report of some third person or newspaper can answer that question, you can do so. 24 .itIte that 25 compromising the core values of both State and Federal 25 for me, sir? + +14) v, Page 5' were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the 3 unsupportable? 3 Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers 6 without disclosing any attomey/cli t 6 Give me a minute. What page of the Complaint 23 was personally involved in 24 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: so that the Court can make a determination as to 2 Q. Yes, sir. Your Complaint makes reference to a 2 whether I am entitled to see it. 3 purpose in filing this lawsuit — 3 MR. PIKE: I would object based upon 4 A. Yes. 4 attorney/client and work product in that regard. 6 lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by 6 break? 7 the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint. 7 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, because you still 8 A. Yes, sir. 8 haven't answered my question. 9 Q. Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers 9 THE WITNESS: Okay. 10 on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint? 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: I I MR. PIKE: Okay. Form. Mischaracterizes the 11 Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking 12 Complaint itself. 12 and honest lawyers" are that are erred to in that 13 To the extent you understand that question, 13 section of your Complaint. 1 4 you can attempt to answer, if you recall. 14 A. My attomcys, at I t. 15 THE WITNESS: Yes. 15 Q. Which ones? 16 The U.S. Attorney, sir, has accused the 16 A. All of th 17 Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system, 17 Q. And yo that u t to vindicate the 18 a level of abuse never seen before in the United 18 hardworking wyers and their clients? 19 States history, of forging documents, an affront to 19 A. That' 20 any decent lawyer, signing Judges Orders, sending 20 Q. Which s? 21 false statements to other lawyers. The people who 21 me of the other clients, in fact, abused 22 have been — excuse me — the Complaint by the U.S. 22 Win firm. I don't know the full extent. 23 Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the 23 H u when we get to trial, we're going to find out 24 law firm, as well as Mr. — my Complaint says. 24 ent of the people, the lawyers, the clients that 25 Mr. being a part of that. abused by Mr. and the Rothstein limn. + +5 Q. — to vindicate the hardworking and honest 5 THE WITNESS: Now can we take a bathroom + +I BY MR. SCAROLA: We have asked for Scott Rothstein's 2 Q. Now, before you answered that question, 9 5 Q. Pd like to sec it, please. 5 forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. 6 MR. PIKE: Definitely not, Mr. 6 Q. Now, was it your intention in this sentence to 7 My notes are on that and that's 7 say that you were trying to vindicate the hardworking 8 attorney/client. I allowed fitness to take a 8 and honest lawyers and their clients? 9 look at the document and h write anything 9 A. It's attorney/client. I'm sorry. 10 on the document, caked the document. 10 Q. Your intention is attorney/client privileged? 1 1 That's my clien you will certainly not be 11 MR. PIKE: Form. I'm not quite -- 12 looking at are all over this 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 document. 13 Q. Is that what you're telling us? 14 M : He didn't look at everything. 14 MR. PIKE: Wait a second. I'm not quite sure 15 one page. I would like that one page• 15 I understand the question. 16 p 16 THE WITNESS: What's the question? 17 MR. BCE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 MR. SCAROLA: I would like that page marked as 18 Q. Were you attempting to communicate in this 20 MR. PIKE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. 20 and honest lawyers and their clients? 21 MR. SCAROLA: I would state for the record 21 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 that it is my intention, since that page with 22 THE WITNESS: In this Complaint, I intend to 23 handwritten notations on it was reviewed by the 23 get to the truth of Mr. behavior and the 24 witness during the course of this deposition while 24 Rothstein firm, sir. 25 a question was pending, I want that page preserved 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +deposition. We hopefully will get it. Maybe he will 3 reviewed a document, right? 3 give us some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact. 4 A. The Complaint, sir. 4 been handled and the abuses they've undergone, includnig 19 an Exhibit to this deposition. 19 Complaint a desire on your part to vindicate hardworking + +1 2 3 Q. Well, what this sentence says is, quote, — A. Yes. Q. -- "the Rothstein racketeering enterprise 4 endeavored to compromise the core values of both State 4 Q. Is that what you meant to say? 5 and Federal systems in South Florida and to vindicate 5 A. What I meant to say, it is — seems to me 6 the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who 6 somewhat unclear — is that the Rothstein firm, along 7 were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the 7 with Mr. is part of a criminal enterprise, the + +1 2 the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint? + +3 + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +8 subject of this Complaint." 8 largest -- excuse me — the largest criminal enterprise + +9 Is that what you meant to communicate? 9 in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, 10 A. It says what it says, sir. 10 engaging in illegal wire taps, illegal behaviors. And 11 Q. Well, I know it says what it says. I'm trying 11 part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which means, I 12 to find out if that's what you meant to say; that is, 12 believe should set right. 13 that the Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to 13 And if it's not clear, the Roth ein firm 15 clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct 15 It abused every — many of theprecepts, the most basic 16 that is the subject of this Complaint. 16 values of the American justichustcm. + +14 vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their 14 compromised the core values of our legal justice system. + +17 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the 17 And, in fact, I believer this lawsuit, part of 18 language of the document. 18 the reason for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the 19 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I think you've misread 19 various techniques °I-attorney/client privilege, abuse wire for the Rothstein to vindicate the lawyers, is 21 fo si tures engaged in by both Mr. and + +20 that again. You want to — I certainly didn't ask 20 of technique. abuse of discovery, illegal ait l 21 fun, 22 what you've just -- 22 + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 ts your contention that Mr. was + +24 Q. Well, that's what fm trying to find out, 24 a criminal enterprise? 25 whether you meant to say what you said in this 2 Yes, it is. + +1 Complaint. Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? 2 Did you read the Complaint before it was MR. PIKE: Form. + +3 filed? 3 THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege. + +4 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. 4 MR. SCAROLA: You wanted to take a break and 5 THE WITNESS: Thank you, sits - ) 5 before I move on to another subject, we'll do that. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 But I want — I want to observe for the record that 7 Q. Did you read the Complaint before it %lot. 7 the last break was less than an hour ago. While I B filed? 8 want to try to make reasonable accommodations to 9 A. It was a while ago, yes 9 witnesses so as not to impose unnecessarily upon 12 A. Yes, si 12 the cause of this deposition. + +10 Q. And did you>JpQrove mplaint prior to its 10 their physical comfort, I will object to breaks 11 filing? 11 occurring at less than one-how intervals during + +13 Q. i i - to say what this sentence 13 VIDEOGRAPHER: We' re now off video record. I. + +14 says," si 4I ••t homing enterprise endeavored 14 is 11:34 a.m. 15 to rdworking and honest lawyers and 15 (Brief recess.) 16 their cli who were adversely affected by the 16 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video + +17 miscondu that is the subject of this Complaint?" 17 record. It is I I :45 a.m. and we are on media + +18 MR. PIKE: Okay. I'm going to move to strike. 18 number two. 19 Mischaracterizes the language of the document. 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +20 The document reads as follows, for purposes of 20 Q. What knowledge do you have of Brad 21 the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise 21 ever having personally engaged in mail fraud? 22 endeavored to compromise the core values of both 22 A. It's been widely reported in the press — 23 State and Federal justice systems in South Florida 23 Q. I'm going to withdraw my question. 24 and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers 24 What personal knowledge do you have of 25 and their clients who were adversely affected by 25 ever having been engaged in any mail fraud? + +1 A. Will you describe what you mean by "personal 1 can answer it without violating attorney/client and 2 knowledge," sir? 2 work product, you can answer the question. 3 Q. I mean direct observation through your senses 3 THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it will be 4 on your part. 4 attorney/client privilege, sir. 5 A. So arc you asking me whether or not I've 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 Q. I'm asking whether you have ever personally 8 in any effort to market any kind of investment in 9 witnessed ever having engaged in mail 9 anything? 10 fraud. 10 A. I would have to claim attorney/client 11 A. I'm not sure how thats possible for anybody 11 privilege on that. sir. 12 to witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's 12 MR. PIKE: Form. 13 done? 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 Q. So the answer to my question is, you don't 14 Q. Do you have knowl c o a vidence 15 know; is that correct? 15 whatsoever that Mr. as ever a participant in 16 A. My answer to your question is — 16 devising a plan thro rc sold purported 17 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizcs the 17 confidential asst nts o Cured payout 18 witnese testimony. 18 settlement? 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 that Mr. crafted -- would you repeat the 21 Q. Have you ever personally witnessed 21 qu on , again, sir? I'm sorry. 22 engaging in mail fraud? 22 4. Yes r. I want to know whether you have any 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 purported confidential assignments of a structured + +6 witnessed him sending something directly, putting 6 Q. Do you have any evidence — knowledge of any 7 physically in the mail, sir? 7 evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever participated 19 THE WITNESS: I've asked for a clarification. 19 A. The and blogs have widely reported 23 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 k of evidence that personal I:. 24 THE WITNESS: No, sir. 24 r rticipated in devising a plan through which were + +777 + +2 Q. Have you ever personally witnessed Edward — engaged in wire fraud? 4 personal — have personal knowledge, wit 4 by saying that the newspapers have reported that S engaging in wire fraud, unless they we i t g 5 his firm was engaged in fraudulent structured 7 unfortunately, I would have to say, no, 7 investors. 8 Q. Have you ever perso witnessed 8 With respect to my personal knowledge. I'm 9 engaged in money la 9 unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward 10 MR. PIKE: Fo 10 to at some point being able to disclose it, today 11 THE WITH gain, sir, the U.S. Attorney's 11 I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client 12 Complaint oth n firm alleges money 12 privilege. 13 launderin wire ud, mail fraud, RICO claims of 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 Mr. ers and his firm, calling the 14 Q. Your Complaint alleges that Rothstein and 16 Flori history, accused of fabricating malicious 16 Who are the others referred to in the 17 cases, si , of a sexually charged nature in order 17 Complaint? 18 to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of 18 A. From my understanding of the U.S. Attorney's 19 millions of dollars. 19 Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it is the 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 partners and people who held themselves out to be 21 Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, 21 partners of the Roth — Scott Rothstein, including 22 whether you have any evidence whatsoever that 22 Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. and other people 23 Mr. ever personally participated in any of that 23 associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane 24 wrongdoing? 24 if that's how you pronounce her name, 25 MR. PIKE: To that question, to the extent you 25 Adler. and many of the other partners of his firm + +payout settlement? MR. PIKE: Form. 3 A. How would one — Pm not sure how 3 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer that question 6 over their computer looking at their acco s. So. 6 settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida 15 ft st criminal enterprise in South 15 others in RRA were using RRA to market investments. + +1 currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar 1 advice of Counsel rm going to have to assert my Fifth, 2 or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. 2 Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +3 Q. Which — which source of information 3 Q. Okay. Well, rm not limiting my question to + +4 referenced in that answer specifically made reference to 4 the three cases referenced in your Complaint. I want to + +5 Mr. 5 know whether you contend that any claim against you has + +6 A. I don't recall, sir. 6 been fabricated? + +7 Q. But you do have a recollection that one or 7 MR. PIKE: Form. Overbroad and confusing and + +8 more of them did; is that correct? 8 it's compound. + +9 A. I don't recall, sir. 9 THE WITNESS: The question makes no sense to + +10 Q. So you want to withdraw the earlier response 10 me. rm sure you could do better. + +11 that you made and your real answer is, I don't know; is 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: 12 that correct? 12 Q. Is there any pending claim inst you which + +13 MR. PIKE: Mischaracterizes the witness 13 you contend is fabricated? + +14 testimony. Move to strike. 14 A. At least today, sir, I mg c to + +15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 15 respond by asserting my Fl th and 14th Amendment 17 A. My answer stays the same, sir. 17 MR. PIKE: Fe. + +16 Q. Your response, sir? 16 Right. + +18 Q. Is it your contention that one or more + +19 lawsuits was fabricated against you? + +18 BY MR. SCyA ortA + +19 Q. Is it contention that was + +20 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers -- 20 ever personally involved in manufacturing false and/or + +21 Q. That's not my question. 21 fraudulent Court Opinions or Orders? + +22 A. Excuse me. I was answering. 22 A. Attorney/client privilege. + +23 MR. PIKE: Please let the witness answer the 23 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to someone 24 question, Mr. Scarola. 24 s 'Jig through a potential defendant's garbage looking + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: r damaging evidence to use with investors to show him + +Q. No, you're not answering my question. + +' 14)1 + +potential defendants could be, in essence, blackmailed. + +2 MR. PIKE: He's only said three words, so 2 MR. PIKE: Would you identify for me, + +3 don't know whether he's answering your 3 Mr. Scarola, what page? 4 not. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Page 8, paragraph 19. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: I didn't ask ut 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 newspapers. I asked him about If nteni I 6 Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage + +7 don't know he's not answering my 7 looking for damaging evidence? + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 MR. PIKE: One second. + +9 Q. But you can go ahead, cin, and you can 9 In light of clarity, Mr. Scarola, would you + +10 make your silly s no 10 please read the entire paragraph so Mr. Epstein + +11 MR. PIKE: ing to move to strike. 11 understands the tenor of the paragraph? + +12 THE want to repeat the question? 12 MR. SCAROLA: No. I want to know whether + +13 BY MR. SC 13 anyone ever sifted through Mr. garbage -- + +14 Q. Y Id like to know whether it is 14 through Mr. Epstein's garbage. That's the pending + +15 your that one or more lawsuits have been 15 question. + +16 fabrics inst you. 16 MR. PIKE: To the extent you understand the + +17 A. My ontention, sir, is that the firm of 17 question, you can answer. + +18 partners, Scott Rothstein, fabricated many 18 THE WITNESS: I think the question is poorly + +19 cases, reported by the press and the U.S. Attorney, 19 phrased. Did anyone ever sift through my garbage? + +20 amongst people like me and others of a sexually charged 20 What does that mean? + +21 nature in order to fleece investors of South Florida out 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +22 of millions of dollars. 22 Q. You don't know what sifting through garbage + +23 Do I have a — with respect to my individual 23 means? + +24 cases that Mr. has filed in these three cases, 24 A. Does that mean the garbage man? Does that + +25 rm unfortunately today, and only today at least, on 25 include the garbage man? I'm sure he sifted through my + +1 garbage. 1 THE WITNESS: Again, I'll respectfully answer 2 Q. Which garbage man sifted through your garbage? 2 the question by asserting my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 3 A. I'm sure people who go through garbage sift 3 Amendment Right. 4 through the garbage. I have no idea. 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage 5 Q. Your Complaint in paragraph 21, page 9, says 6 looking for damaging evidence? 6 that: "Upon information and belief, Rothstein, David 10 blackmail them. 10 false statements were made about the number of 11 Q. Yes. But I didn't ask you what some newspaper 11 cases/clients that existed or RRA had against Epstein 12 is alleged to have reported. 12 and the value thereof." 13 What I did ask you is whether anyone ever 13 Do you have any know) Mr. 14 sifted through your garbage looking for damaging 14 ever knew about such meetingeoking ucted? 15 evidence. 15 MR. PIKE: Form. 16 And the answer to that question, I think, can 16 To the extent you understand the question and 17 be either yes, no, or I don't know. 17 it will not violate any attorney/client or work 18 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 18 product prix liege infornudion, you can answer that 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 question. 20 Q. Or you could refuse to answer it on the 20 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, it has become evident 21 grounds that it may tend to incriminate you. 21 that speaking instruction to your witness is 22 A. I think you might - 22 tniction for him to assert an attorney/client 23 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 23 lege, regardless of whether it is or is not 24 THE WITNESS: I would like to answer my Own 24 and 1 object to it. 25 questions. If you'd like to answer all my MR. PIKE: Let me make the record clear. + +7 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers, 7 Boden, Debbie Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten 8 sir, that the Rothstein fine engaged in sifting through 8 and Kenneth Jenne, all employees of RRA, through brokers 9 many people's garbage in order — in an attempt to 9 or middle men would stage regular meetings dining which + +1 questions, Mr. Scarola, I'm more than happy to sit You've been interchanging knowledge with personal 2 here and answer them. Would you like to • . • C knowledge. And many of the objections to which I 4 Q. Yes. I'd like to know what the an t, 4 privilege are based upon your malphrased question 17 with — with your questions and your claims 17 MR. SCAROLA: I am saying you're coaching the + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 ant asserting an attorney/client and work product S question is. Did anyone ever sift thro at age 5 and use of personal knowledge and knowledge 6 looking for damaging evidence? 6 interchangeably with those questions. 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 So if you want to rephrase your question to B THE WITNESS: I do w. 8 attempt to elicit a response — let me finish — 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 then I have no objection to that. However, I'm not 10 Q. Did you ever dama 'ng evidence in your 10 going to sit here and allow my client to waive 11 garbage? 11 attorney/client and work product. 12 A. What's • 1 ing •dente, sir? 12 Now, to the extent you're saying I'm coaching 13 Q. Evin • • - t , g to implicate you in criminal 13 the witness, T object to that because I am 14 conduct. 14 certainly not. The witness is here to answer your 15 • Form. 15 questions and I believe has been answering your 16 WITNESS: At least today, Mr. Scarola, 16 questions today to the best of his ability. 18 and your defense of Mr. and his firm, the 18 witness. 19 Rothstein firm, while his partner sits in jail, 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 20 Q. Could you answer the question? 21 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. 21 MR. PIKE: Same objection. 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 THE WITNESS: You'll have to repeat it. 23 Q. Did you ever have any evidence in your garbage 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 that would subject you to blackmail? 24 Q. Do you have any information indicating that 25 MR. PIKE: Form. Same — same objection. 25 ever had any knowledge of anyone + +1 associated with the Rothstein firm holding meetings 1 Q. Do you have any -- do you have knowledge of 2 during which, quote, "false statements were made about 2 the existence of any evidence that knew 3 the number of cases/clients that existed or RRA had 3 that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi 4 against Epstein and the value thereof," unquote? 4 scheme? + +5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. Same objection. 5 MR. PIKE: Form. 6 THE WITNESS: My best recollection is the U.S. 6 THE WITNESS: That's attorney/client 7 Attorney Ms accused the Rothstein farm of just 7 privilege. 8 those types of meetings where the partners got 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 together, schemed to defraud local investors of 9 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence that 10 millions of dollars by fabricating cases of a 10 would indicate should have known that 11 sexually charged nature. And whether Mr. 11 Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi 12 personally participated, I'm going to at least 12 scheme? 13 today, sir, have to assert the attorney/client 13 MR. PIKE: Point. 14 privilege, but look forward to one day disclosing 14 THE WITNESS: At 15 it. 15 MR. PIKE: Wait. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike all unresponsive 16 THE 17 portions of the answer. 17 MR. PUCE. objections. Same + +18 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 attomey/cl t, w uct as to the last + +19 Q. Paragraph 23 of our Complaint says that: 19 question. ob Lions here, attorney/client 20 "RRA, Rothstein and claiming the need for 20 work u 21 anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, 21 S: And today Pm going to have to 22 they were able to effectively use initials," et cetera. 22 th ttomey/client privilege. + +23 Do you have any knowledge that 23 IKE: To the extent you can answer that 24 fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? 24 tion -- 25 MR. PIKE: Form. THE WITNESS: I understand. + +777 + +I THE WITNESS: I believe Mr. Scherer's 2 Complaint -- 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +MR. PIKE: — then, please, — + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. PIKE: — answer Mr. Scamla's question. + +9.."' I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Comp, 4 THE WITNESS: Separate from - 5 Q. Pm asking about any evidence that yo ve. 5 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching the 6 MR. PIKE: The witness is basi Ily been five 6 witness. 7 words into his sentence and you're wing him 7 THE WITNESS: Separate from the communicatio. 8 to finish, once again. 8 I've had with my attorneys, I can't answer that + +9 So if you recall the quest , please 9 question. 10 respond. 10 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, I'm confused. I + +11 THE ease repeat it back, please? 11 started objecting to form in the beginning of this + +2 MR. PI ourt Reporter, if you 12 deposition. You then instructed me, which is + +-.. 3 would. 13 against the rules, Mr. Pike, I don't know what's -.. 4 (P n was read.) 14 wrong with the form. I object to you objecting to + +- 5 : Form. 15 form. + +16 WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and 16 Then I assert the attorney/client, work . 7 his clai against the Rothstein firm for a massive 17 product, and now you're telling me I'm coaching the 8 fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to — at 18 witness. 19 least in the - described in the public press, 19 So tell me, Mr. Scarola, what is the — what 20 because he went to the FBI, for fabricating cases 20 is the way that you would like me to object in this + +21 that included initials. 21 deposition, and maybe I can conform that way for 22 With to anything specific with 22 you, which may or may not be consistent with the + +23 Mr. I'm going to have to claim the 23 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. 24 attorney/client privilege today, sir. 24 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, -- + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: 25 MR. PIKE: Yes, sir. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: - if you don't know the 2 difference between a form objection and a privilege 3 objection — 4 MR. PIKE: Right. 5 MR. SCAROLA: — then this deposition is not 6 the proper context in which for you to learn the 7 difference between a form objection and a privilege 8 action. 9 MR. PIKE: I'm pretty clear on what a form 10 objection is and what a privilege objection is and 11 I'm pretty knowledgeable on that. The problem — 12 MR. SCAROLA: Then we don't need to engage in 13 any further discussion. 14 MR. PIKE: — I want to try to make the record 15 clear, because initially you didn't want me to 16 object to form. You wanted me to speak. So I'm 17 thinking you're conceding to that point. 18 What my question is, is: What's wrong with my 19 objecting to attorney/client, work product? So I 20 guess I'm asking you what you were asking me 21 earlier on. What's wrong with the form? 22 We can just move forward. 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 , Q. In your C taint you identify the RRA law 25 firm Rothstein and as the, quote, "litigation + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 team," unquote. You then go on to say in paragraph 31 of Complaint at page 12 that: "Rothstein and litigation team" — MR. PIKE: Wait a minute. Put that do PJ a second. Hold on. THE WITNESS: You can read it. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. "Individually and in a d effort may have unethically and jltgally gad in certain specified conduct May we that you don' quote, "li in ly lude from that statement knowledge as to whether the, " including Mr. engaged and illegal conduct? PIKE: For now, while I'm reviewing the documclit itself, I'm just going to just tell you to hold off — THE WITNESS: Sure. MR. PIKE: — on answering that question. You may want to go off the record, so we don't have a lag in — MR. SCAROLA: No, I'd like it on the record. Thank you. MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, did you bring an extra + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 copy of the Complaint that you're questioning Mr. Epstein on for Mr. Epstein to look at? MR. SCAROLA: No. MR. PIKE: Okay. I'm going to have to go get him a copy so he can — the paragraphs of this Complaint are very long and the Complaint itself is in excess of — it was approximately 35 pages, MR. SCAROLA: I'll withdraw the question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you have any evidence that Brad sold, allowed to be sold and/or assist/1 with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? MR. PIKE: Form. j , THE WITNESS: lltamespapers have widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settlements of cases of a sexual nature, including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the documents tom Mr, and his finn and we ha' e not been able to get them as of yet. A cam confident that once we 4%1 will be able -to answer your questions with more specificity. mg. SCAROLA: you sit here today, do you have any ence whatsoever to support an assertion that + +2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M, individually and personally, sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? MR. PIKE: Before you answer that question, Madame Court Reporter, will you please read that question back to me? (Pending question was read.) MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question without divulging attorney/client or work product information, you may answer that question. MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. THE WITNESS: You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege to the answer, Pm afraid, but I'd like to answer that question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence indicating that ever reached agreement. to share attorney's fees with non-lawyers? MR. PIKE: I'm sorry. Mr. Scarola, can you tell me what page of the Complaint you're referring to, if you arc? MR. SCAROLA: I'm not referring to any page of the Complaint, although I will tell you that that precise allegation is made in the Complaint. + +1 THE WITNESS: In fact, Mr. Scarola, we have +2 subpoenaed Mr. [REDACTED] documents and documents +3 from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me +4 more specificity with the answers to that question. + +5 I'm looking forward to getting the -- that +6 specific evidence. With respect to what we +7 currently know, sitting here today, I'm +8 unfortunately going to have to claim my +9 attorney/client privilege. + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +11 Q. Do you today have any evidence to support an +12 assertion that [REDACTED] ever used investor money +13 to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front money, such +14 that they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +15 MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +16 THE WITNESS: You'll have to get -- I need to +17 hear the first part of the question. Do I have any +18 evidence? Do I have knowledge of evidence? I'm +19 sorry. What was the -- + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence to +22 support that assertion? + +23 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that +24 question without violating attorney/client, work +25 product, please do so. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. +2 THE WITNESS: I'm going to have to assert the +3 attorney/client privilege, I'm afraid, though I'd +4 like to answer that question as well, sir. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. Do you have any evidence to support the +7 assertion that [REDACTED] conducted searches, wire +8 taps or intercepted conversations in violation of State +9 or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +10 A. Your question, once again, asked did Mr. -- +11 was Mr. [REDACTED] personally involved in the +12 eavesdropping? Did he walk to someone's house and sort +13 of put a bug in their house? Did he, personally, stand +14 outside? + +15 The question is, did Mr. [REDACTED] firm engage +16 in this behavior in an attempt to defraud local +17 investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. attorney +18 has filed a Complaint saying that they did. The +19 Complaints filed by Scherer saying that his firm did. + +20 The Scherer Complaint says my name and the +21 boxes of files that we've subpoenaed used my name, sir. + +22 We have requested information, but up until +23 today have not received any. + +24 To give you a more specific answer, I'm afraid +25 I cannot. + +1 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence that +2 [REDACTED] ever conducted searches, wire taps or +3 intercepted conversations in violation of State or +4 Federal laws and Bar rules? + +5 MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +6 THE WITNESS: The newspapers and the U.S. +7 Attorney's Complaint widely reported that +8 Mr. [REDACTED] firm and people hired by his firm, +9 investigators hired by his firm fraudulently +10 representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in +11 just those activities, sir. + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that +14 [REDACTED] was ever aware of any such activities? + +15 A. I'm going to have to -- + +16 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +17 THE WITNESS: -- assert the attorney/client +18 privilege to that, sir. + +19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +20 Q. Do you have any knowledge that [REDACTED] +21 ever participated in or was aware of actions that +22 utilized the judicial process, including, but not +23 limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for +24 the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +25 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +1 To the extent you can answer the question +2 without disclosing attorney/client or work product +3 information, do so. + +4 THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer +5 with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South +6 Florida's history engaged in by Mr. [REDACTED] firm +7 and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, +8 probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, +9 not only illegal wire taps and eavesdropping, but +10 an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe +11 speaks for itself. + +12 Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. [REDACTED] +13 today, I'm going to have to assert the +14 attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + +15 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +16 Q. Is it your contention that Mr. Scherer's +17 Complaint even contains the name [REDACTED]? + +18 A. I don't recall, sir. + +19 Q. Did sexual assaults ever take place on a +20 private airplane on which you were a passenger? + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +22 THE WITNESS: At least -- I would like to +23 answer each and every one of your questions here +24 today, Mr. Scarola. But at least today, I'm going +25 do have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +Amendment Rights as provided by the U.S. 1 about. The one in which your deposition is being taken 6 International figures? 6 misbehavior on Mr. part, and the Complaint was + +2 Constitution. 2 today. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 Do you know who brought those persons' names 4 Q. Does a flight log kept for a private jet used 4 into this lawsuit? 5 by you contain the names of celebrities, dignitaries or 5 A. As a reaction, and only as a reaction to total 7 A. At least today, sir, I'm going to have to 7 obviously written by my attorneys, sir. 8 respectfully decline to answer based on my Fifth, Sixth 8 Q. So you know that those names are in your 9 and 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer that 9 Complaint, right? 10 question. 10 A. Yes, sir. 11 Q. Have you ever had a personal relationship with 11 Q. Okay. So because those names are in your 12 Donald Trump? 12 Complaint, I'm asking you about ple you named. 13 A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," 13 Have you had a social relation ip with Tommy 14 sir? 14 Mottola? 15 Q. Have you socialized with him? 15 A. The names in my C'npla int are strictly as a 16 A. Yes, sir. 16 reaction to the abusive-discovery process by 17 Q. Yes? 17 Mr. MI, his inters. Scott Rothstein, who sits in 18 A. Yes, sir. 18 jail, in an att t t imperil my friendships. 19 Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in 19 But, y have ialized with Mr. Mottola. 20 the presence of females under the age of 18? 20 Q. ye socialized with Mr. Mottola in 21 A. Though rd like to answer that question, at 21 the f females under the age of I8? 22 least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 22 . Form. 23 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. 23 WITNESS: At least today, the typical to 24 Q. Have you socialized with Alan Dershowitz? 24 contention of bringing eases of a 25 A. Yes, sir. He's my attorney, as well as a licious nature where his partner sits in jail for + +1 friend. 2 Q. Have you ever socialized with Alan De 2 today, at least, I nittst assert my Fifth, Sixth and 3 in the presence of females under the age of 3 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 each and every one of your questions, Mr. Scarola. 5 THE WITNESS: Sir, at least hp tod 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth 6 Q. Have you had a social relationship with David 7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights. 7 Copperfield? B BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 A. As a reaction to. once again, the abusive 9 Q. Have you ever socialiNKTommy Mottola? 9 discovery process of bringing in names of pco le that 11 have nothing to dowith this case whatsoever have been 11 Mr. Rothstein's or their clients' claims, by bringing in 12 brought into by Mr in an attempt to 12 the names of friends of mine strictly in an attempt to 13 simply' my tionships with social friends and 13 stress my relationships, imperil my business 14 serves f why this case has been brought 14 relationships, I'm going to say, yes, I do know 15 agai and his firm, sir. 15 Mr. Copperfield. 16 PIKE: Form as well. 16 Q. Have you ever socialized with David 17 BY MR. AROLA: 17 Copperfteld? 18 Q. Well, do you know who brought those persons' 18 A. Again, as — 19 names into this lawsuit? 19 MR. PIECE: Form. 20 MR. PIKE: Form. 20 THE WITNESS: Sorry. 21 And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I 21 It's a typical Rothstein strategy of 22 believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus 22 trying to involve well-known people in maliciously 23 RRA? 23 fabricated cases in order to fleece investors out 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 of millions of dollars. They brought up names in 25 Q. Yes, sir, that's the lawsuit I'm talking 25 attempts at abuse of discovery process to try and + +this — just this type of behavior, the answer is, 10 A. This is the type of questions where people who 10 have absolutely nothing to do with any of Mr. . + +1 take discovery of people who have nothing to do 1 THE WITNESS: In response to your question, 2 with this case. 2 again, my fi/11 answer was, typical of the 3 Did I socialize with David Copperfteld? The 3 'Rothstein scheme to ask questions of a 4 answer is, yes. 4 sexual charged nature, crafted cases, the U.S. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Attorney has called his rum the largest fraud in 6 Q. Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield 6 U.S. history, fleecing investors out of millions of 7 in the presence of females under the age of 187 7 dollars by engaging in just these types of 8 A. Pm sure, again, this question is a typical 8 questions. Though I would like to answer each and 9 question of Mr. iRothstein scheme to defraud 9 every question about every one of these people, on 10 investors, asking questions knowing it serves no purpose 10 advice of my Counsel today, I must take — assert 11 or relationship relevance to their case whatsoever. 11 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th 12 At least today, though Pd like to answer that 12 Amendment Right. Though I'd fer to answer the 13 question, on advice of my Counsel, and only on advice of 13 question, I was told that if I chop. to do so, I 14 my Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 14 risk losing their representation. sir. 15 and 14th Amendment Right. 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 16 17 MR. PIKE: Form as well. BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 Q. Have you ever had a social relationship with 18 THE : On ad% ice of Counsel, and only 19 Bill Governor of New Mexico and formerly 19 upon advie of Counsel, though I'd like to answer 20 U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United 20 that question, as well as every other one of your 21 Nations? 21 claims brought by Mr. and his partner, who 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 - currently sits in jail, sir, I would like to answer 23 THE WITNESS: As is typical of the 23 them: questions. But today at least, I have to 25 who sits in jail, what they attempted to do was Amendment Right. Though I'd prefer to answer the + +16 17 Q. Have you ev;sexually abused children? MR. PIKE: F n 24 scheme, along with his partner, Scott Roth.:tein. 24 \assert my Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth TTT + +Page 9 Page 9 6 s >, e question, I'm told by my Counsel that if I choose 5 their claims or cases. 5 Q. How many children have you sexually abused? of 18? 9 harassing. And, moreover, it's my contention that 21 Q. Yes, but that wasn't my question. 21 MR. SCAROLA: Well, it's very interesting that + +1 ( i bring in any celebrity I might have known, 2 well-known people, in an attempt to strictly 2 to do so, which is my preference, I risk losing 3 imperil my relationships with these peopl 3 their representation. 4 these people have no bearing whatsoev o 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Yes, I do have a social relatio p. 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 And I just want to be clear on the record. 8 Q. Have you ever sociali th Mr. 8 These typesof questions are argumentative and 9 in the presence of females 10 MR. PIKE: F 10 these types of questions arc not related to this 11 THE gain, typical of the 11 lawsuit by any stretch of the imagination. In this 12 sc of bringing in well-known 12 deposition, while I've been liberal in allowing 13 people, ng ridiculous questions, 13 these questions, am being utilized in an attempt 14 ridicu in an attempt strictly to 14 to provoke a waiver of the Fifth Amendment Right. 15 lationships with these people where 15 There has been an Order entered by, I believe. 16 they e absolutely nothing to do with anything to 16 Judge Hafele regarding that types of questions. 17 do with , Rothstein or any of their alleged 17 So with that caution, Mr. Scarola, I would ask 18 victims, the answer to your question is, yes, I 18 you that you refrain from asking abusive and 19 have socialized. 19 harassing questions that are not relevant to this 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 case. 22 My question was: Have you ever socialized 22 you claim they're not relevant when they are 23 with Mr. Richards in the presence of females under the 23 directly taken from the allegations in your 24 age of 18? 24 Complaint. 25 MR. PIKE: Form. 2.5 And I agree with you that they are not + +relevant because there is no basis whatsoever for 2 this claim against Mr. But since you've 2 MR. PIKE: Okay. Do you have an objection to 3 made these baseless allegations, I am obliged to 3 us taking a quick bathroom break and - 4 pursue the allegations by asking these questions. 4 TIIE WITNESS: P11 just walk out and back in. + +MR. SCAROLA: Uh-huh. + +5 So we'll move on from there. And whenever you 5 MR. SCAROLA: If Mr. Epstein needs to go to 6 think it's appropriate to terminate this deposition 6 the bathroom Mr. Epstein needs to go to the 7 because you believe that I've acted 7 bathroom. 8 inappropriately, be my guest. e TILE WITNESS: Thank you, sir. + +9 MR. PIKE: I appreciate your invitation. 9 MR. PIKE: Then we're off the record? 10 Mr. Scarola. 10 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off the record. + +11 I'm going to move to strike. 11 (Brief recess.) + +12 The fact is, Mr. Scarola, is that, these types 12 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are k on video record at + +13 of questions have already been ruled upon as being 13 12:43 p.m. 14 argumentative and harassing. 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +15 If you want to direct some questions relevant 15 Q. I think when we record you had 16 to your lawsuit, l invite you to do so. But 16 requested that the las u gave and the 18 mechanism to provoke a waiver of the Fifth 18 so well start • + +17 attempting to use this deposition process as a 17 question asked of at answer be read back, + +19 Amendment and to obtain information that is more or 19 MR. PI : e Court Reporter. 20 potentially more relevant to Mr. cases in 20 us on and answer were read.) + +21 which he is lead Counsel on, I think is improper. 21 I 'MESS: Sounds like a complete answer to + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 + +23 Q. Did you have staff members that assisted you 23 OLA: 24 in scheduling appointments with underage females; that 24 •. sir. My question to you following that + +, 5 is, females under the age of 18? was: Who are the others to whom you made o BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 were the victims of the Rothstein scam. + +2 A. So along with many of the other claims that the Rothstein finn crafted with malicious claims 2 3 people like me and others of a sexually cbarg 3 A. Can you repeat where it says me and others? 4 in order to simply fleece investors out of - 4 Pm sorry. 5 dollars in South Florida, these types o 5 MR. SCAROLA: Read it back again, please. 6 though Pd like to answer today, at lea c 6 Sandy. 7 question, I'm going to have to assert, rely, my 7 (Answer was read.) 8 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amend Right, though I'd prefer 8 THE WITNESS: The others are people reported + +reference in that response? You said, "me and others." Who are the others? + +9 to answer the question. 9 in the press to be many people in South Florida who + +1 Q. Who are referred to in that 11 I'm glad — I'm happy to answer the others. + +2 response? 12 Pd like to know the others. In fact, we've 3 A. Again; sir? 13 subpoenaed documents from the bankruptcy trustee o' + +1 4 Q. You said you d others. Who arc the others 14 Brad firm in an attempt to find out more + +5 that erring to? 15 details of the others that you've just asked about. + +. 6 A. 'II have to read my answer back. 16 People — I believe the Attorney Scherer has + +. r MR. IKE: I'm sorry. Madame Court Reporter, 17 filed a Complaint for some of the others who have 8 would you please read the witness' answer back? 18 been defrauded, as well as some of the investors + +19 THE WITNESS: You'll have to -- I have to take 19 who were told about many others, sir. 20 a bathroom break. 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 MR. PIKE: Actually I don't — one second. 21 Q. So you don't know any names; is that correct? + +22 For the record, we're going on 12:30 now. Is 22 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. 23 there — do you have a time frame as to when you -- 23 Mischaracterizes the witness' testimony. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: About a half hour. 24 THE WITNESS: Pm sure that's an -- it's an + +25 MR. PIKE: You have a half hour left? 25 easy way of saying that as a response to the + +1 questions and subpoenas we've asked Mr. to 1 Amendment Right. 2 produce so we can find out the specific names of 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 the others who have been — the U.S. Attorney has 3 Q. Who are the minors who you solicited for 4 claimed have been blackmailed and victims of the 4 prostitution? 5 Rothstein firm. 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 6 I'd be happy, and hopefully at the end of this 6 711E WITNESS: Who are the — I pled guilty to 7 trial everyone will know some of the names of the 7 soliciting prostitution. There was no soliciting Et others, sir. 8 minors charge, sir. + +9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 MR. SCAROLA: Could you read back the response + +10 Q. Do you know the names of any of the others? 10 to the question about what Mr. Epstein pled guilty + +11 A. No, sir, If do not. However, the U.S. 11 to, please? + +12 Attorney, we believe, is going to file more charges 1.2 MR. PIKE: About four q back. 13 against Mr. Roth — Mr. partners. And 13 (Previous question and read.) 14 Mr. Scherer and us have subpoenaed the bankruptcy 14 MR. PIKE: And his 15 trustee for the names of the others. 15 MR. SCAROLA: his answer. + +16 So sitting here today, I do not. Hopefully 16 BY MR. SCAROLA:/ 17 sometime before trial we will have names of the others. 17 Q. Who are the u procured for 18 sir. 18 prostitution? + +19 Q. Have you ever pled guilty to any criminal 19 MR. P F + +20 wrongdoing? 20 TI WI I believe if you — my answer 21 A. Yes, sir. 21 t , . • • g a minor, sir, not minors. + +22 Q. What criminal wrongdoing did you plead guilty 22 , I' OLA: + +23 to? 23 ' i • is the minor that you procured for + +24 A. A solicitation of prostitution and procuring a 24 on? 25 minor for prostitution, sir. I do not know. + +1 Q. On how Tinny occasions did you solicit MR. PIKE: Form. And relevance. 2 prostitution? BY MR. SCAROLA: + +3 A. Undcr — excuse mc? Again? 3 Q. How many minors have you procured for + +4 Q. On how many occasions did you so 4 prostitution? + +5 prostitution? 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. + +6 A. At least sitting here today, I'm ing to 6 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, sir, I'm 7 to, on advice of Counsel, assert my Fi 7 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +8 16th Amendment (sic) and Fo sic) Amendment Right. 8 Amendment Right, though I pled guilty to procuring + +9 Q. On how many occasion plead guilty to 9 a single minor. 0 soliciting prostitution 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +:1 A. Once, sir. 11 Q. Yes, but my question wasn't about what you :2 Q. How o icitation of prostitution 12 pled guilty to. I just want to know how many minors yo:i 13 did you plead t, ' 13 have procured for prostitution. + +:4 A. 14 MR. PIKE: Asked and answered. + +15 the names of the individuals who you 15 THE WITNESS: Again, al least with respect to :7 A. I do t know. 17 procuring a single minor. + +1 6 pled gui to soliciting as prostitutes? 16 what I've pled guilty to, I pled guilty to + +18 Q. When did those acts occur? 18 With respect to the rest of your question, I'm 19 A. I do not know. 19 going to have to asses my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +20 Q. How many prostitutes have you solicited? 20 Amendment Rights as provided by my Counsel. + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +22 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, at least 22 Q. When did you procure the minor for + +23 sitting here today, sir, I'd like to answer each 23 prostitution as to which procurement you pled guilty? + +24 one of those questions. However, today fin going 24 MR. PIKE: Form. + +25 to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 25 THE WITNESS: I don't know. + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: 1 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 Q. Was there a time before you entered your 2 Q. Paragraph 46(a), last sentence: "Under the 3 guilty plea when you knew the identity of the 3 circumstances, her claim for damages against Epstein. 4 prostitutes that you solicited? 4 one of L.M:s many Johns during that same period," et 5 MR. PIKE: Form. 5 cetera. 6 THE WITNESS: Again? 6 You have identified yourself in this Complaint 8 Q. Was there a time before the entry of your e a reference to a customer of a prostitute. 9 guilty plea when you knew the identity of the 9 I low many times were you one of L.M.'s 10 prostitutes you solicited? 10 customers for purposes of prostitution? 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 11 A. Well, now that you've now put on the record 12 THE WITNESS: I don't recall. 12 that L.M., I believe, in her depositio \$ an admitted 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 prostitute, I would like to answe t uestion. but on 14 Q. Was there a time before the entry of your 14 advice of Counsel, sir, I'm to ha 15 guilty plea when you knew the identity of thc minor that 15 respectfully decline. But I y to ear you 16 you pled guilty to procuring for prostitution? 16 finally admit it in udtions that your L.M. is 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 17 an admitted prostitu 18 THE WITNESS: I don't know. 18 MR. SC to strike. Unresponsive. 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 BY MR. SCA LA: ' 20 Q. Did you plead guilty because you were, in 20 Q. lime you ever coerced, induced or enticed any 21 fact, guilty? 21 to engage in :my sexual act with you? 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 . PIKE: Form. 23 That's attomey/client, work product. 23 IE WITNESS: A typical question from 24 AttOntyklient. 24 la representing Mr. and the firm 25 MR. SCAROLA: I haven't asked anything about Rothstein, who Scott Rothstein sits in jail for + +7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 as one of L.M.'s many Johns, which you acknowledge to be + +1 any communication. crafting cases of a sexual nature against people in 2 MR. PIKE: It definitely could get into a 2 South Florida, me and others, the others yet to be 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 8 you were, in fact, guilty. 8 Q. How many times have you engaged in fondling 11 Q. Do you the term John to be a slang 11 THE WITNESS: This is relevance here at sonic 24 MR. SCAROLA: Page 22. 24 believe are obvious to the ladies and gentlemen of + +3 communication with Mr. Epstein's lawy 3 determined. However, today, though I'd like to 4 time of the criminal proceeding. 4 answer every one of his questions, on advice of 5 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, it 5 Counsel, at least today, I'm going to have to 7 Q. I want to know whether you p ty because 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 A. I'm going to have to Fifth, Sixth 9 underage females? 10 and 14th A r. 10 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 reference to • i - a prostitute? 12 point? 13 MR. P' ' , 13 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer the 14 N.I :•: Yes, sir. 14 question. 15 BY Al OLA: 15 THE WITNESS: Again, as another one of the 16 Q. many times were you one of L.M.'s 16 irrelevant questions asked of this lawsuit with 17 customers. 17 respect as a client how I was abused by the 18 MR. PIKE: Form. 18 Rothstein firm for his — the practices, the abuse 19 THE WITNESS: L.M.'s customers. 19 of the legal system, the — hopefully, the ladies 20 You'll have to rephrase the question, sir. 20 and gentlemen of the jury will be able to sec 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 through some of these ridiculous questions with 22 Q. Your Complaint says — 22 respect to questions that today, at least, I must 23 MR. PIKE: What page were you reading from? 23 take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, but I 25 MR. PIKE: Thank you. 25 the jury what you're trying to do here, + +1 Mr. Scarola. 1 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 19 20 T., have to. union unatc I y, take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Anwndrnent. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike. Unresponsive. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. PIKE: No. That's fine. 3 Q. Do you have a personal sexual preference for 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 4 children? 5 Q. How many times have you engaged in illegal 5 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. Abusive. 6 sexual touching of minors? 6 Harassing. Not reasonably calculated to lead to 7 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. 7 the discovery of admissible evidence in this case. 8 THE WITNESS: Again, an irrelevant question to 8 THE WITNESS: Another rrelevant 9 this lawsuit, strictly as a continued attempt to 9 question to this lawsuit, Mr. behavior, in 10 bring in irrelevant facts to the fact of what the 10 an attempt to strictly divert attention from the 11 Rothstein firm has done to both me and others in 11 wrongdoing of the Rothstein firm in this matter by 12 South Florida, defrauding investors of millions of 12 asking sexually charged questions in a case where 13 dollars, knowing that at least today I'm going to 13 the Rothstein firm has been chary the U.S. 14 have to with respect to that particular question 14 Attorney of fabricating claims o Heim 15 assert my Fourth — excuse me — Fifth, Sixth and 15 nature, hiding behind attorney/client privilege, 16 14th Amendment Rights. 16 forging documents -- excuse me — but as with 17 MIL SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 17 respect to thew questions designed for nothing 18 MIL PIKE: Mr. Scarola, he's answering your 18 more than to harass me, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to 19 20 question. You're asking abusive and harassing questions that are unrelated to this lawsuit. 21 If you can direct me to anywhere in the 21 AROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 22 Complaint that even remotely addresses your two 22 OLA: 23 questions that you've just posed to Mr. Epstein, 23 e you ever acted on a sexual preference ibr 24 I'd be happy to look at the section in the 24 25 Complaint. But moving to strike the witness' MR. PIKE: Form. Irrelevant. Abusive. + +1 answer when he's answering your abusive and Harassing. And not reasonably calculated to lead 2 harassing questions is improper. 7 2 to admissible evidence in this case. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 THE WITNESS: One more of Mr. Scarola's 4 Q. How many times have you enga 4 irrelevant questions designed nothing more to try 5 with females under the age of 18? 5 to harass me, to divert attention from the fact 6 MR. PIKE: Objection. Ret we and 6 that Mr. and his (-um perpetrated one of 7 harassing. Not reasonably calcula cad to 7 the largest frauds in South Florida's history by 8 discovery of admissible ' in this case. 8 using people like me and others in an attempt to 9 THE WITNESS: A t estion posed by 9 fleece South Florida investors out of millions of 10 Mr. Scarola in an t to 'vert the attention 10 dollars, where the U.S. Attorney has accused his 11 away from the doing of his 13. firm of being the largest criminal eM iin 12 partner, •T ' ihst who sits in jail for 12 South Florida's history, where Mr. partner 13 defraudin •-.. i rs of South Florida of millions 13 sits in prison, potentially for the rest of his 14 of do , r ing malicious cases of a sexual 14 life. 15 order to fleece investors, called by 15 I'd like to answer all of your questions here 16 the Attorney one of the largest frauds in 16 today. Mr. Scarola, even though they're irrelevant; 17 South orida's history. 17 however, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm 18 Mr. Scarola, as l would like to respond to the 18 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 19 questions regarding of your underage girls, the 19 Amendment Right. 20 fondling or the other questions you've asked me 20 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 21 here today, unfortunately, I cannot on advice of 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 Counsel answer those questions, so I must assert my 22 Q. Your Complaint at page 27, paragraph 49, says 23 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights, though 23 that: "BRA and the litigation team took an emotionally 24 these questions arc totally irrelevant to this 24 driven set of facts involving alleged innocent, 25 lawsuit. 25 unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach + +billionaire, and sought to turn it into a gold mine," 1 the cases based on the merits, that is, facts which 2 end of quote. 2 included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions + +3 Who is the Palm Beach billionaire referred to 3 by each of the claimants." 4 in that sentence? 4 A. Yes. 5 A. On advice of Counsel today, Mr. Scarola, 5 Q. Who are the claimants that you're referencing 6 though I would like to answer each one of your 6 there? 7 questions, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 7 A. They're the prostitutes you referred to in the 8 and 14th Amendment Right. 8 past, sir. 9 Q. What is the emotionally driven set of facts to 9 Q. What are their names? 10 which you make reference in that sentence? 10 A. I think the prostitutes' names were — the 11 A. It's the same set of facts that were used by 11 prostitute that you described before was L.M. 12 the Rothstein firm to fleece unsuspecting investors out 12 With respect to the others, I ping to have 13 of millions of dollars, crafting, fabricating malicious 13 to claim the Fifth, Sixth and l4t1tA dment, sir. 14 cases of a sexually charged nature with no fundamental 14 Q. So one of the indiviiltals that 're 15 basis whatsoever, reported wildly by the press. The 15 referencing there is L.M.; hTat correct? 16 U.S. Attorney has accused Mr. partner of not — 16 A. It's -- the indi dual I've referenced is a 17 excuse me — Mr. partner sits currently in 17 person who filed Qc im against me. 18 jail, pled guilty to some of these charges. There are 18 Q. Is it L 19 other members of his firm under investigation for just 19 A. It is L. , as as I know from the claim. 20 these types of questions and fabrications. 20 sir. 21 But, however, today, though I'd like to answer 21 • 0 ' . So one of the people that you're 22 every one of your questions with specificity, on advice 22 i - , • L.M., who you've identified as L.M.; is 23 of Counsel I'm not going to be able to, Mr. Scarola, and 23 .:' •i - 24 respectfully decline based on my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 24 th respect to that question, sir, on advice 25 Amendment Right. oaf. ounsel, Fm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth + +777 + +Page 11 Page 11' 7 attorney/client privilege, sir. 7 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and lath Amendment Right. 13 litigation, of having my attorneys prepare + +1 Q. What day are you prepared to answer all these 1 and 14th Amendment. 2 questions? 2 Q. What are the voluntary and consensual actions 3 MR. PIKE: Form. Attorney/client and 3 by L.M. that you are referencing there? 4 product. 4 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each one of 5 THE WITNESS: That's attorney 5 your questions here today, Fm going to have to 6 could answer that question as well, ut ifs f 6 respectfully decline based on advice of my Counsel, and 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 Q. What are the damages that you claim to have 9 Q. Your Complaint says er than 9 suffered as a consequence of any wrongdoing on the pan :0 evaluating and resole e aced on the merits," 10 of IIIIP II open parens, "i.e., close parens, "which 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 included kno - e, terry and consensual actions 12 THE WITNESS: The cost of ridiculous :3 by each of " et cetera. 'mans :4 that are referenced 14 responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various :5 there 15 locations at a minimum, sir. 6 A. I I'm sorry. You have to repeat the 16 BY MR. SCAROLA: 17 question. 17 Q. Which lawyers? :8 Q. Yes, sir. Your Complaint says,: -- 18 A. Burman Critton, Jack Goldberger, and a bunch :9 MR. PIKE: Page? 19 of the others, sir. 20 Q. — "rather than evaluating" — 20 Q. Which ones? Name them forme, please. 21 MR. PIKE: Can you give me a page, sit? 21 A. Specifically — I have so many lawyers 22 MR. SCAROLA: Page 27, paragraph 49, second 22 defending me here against Mr. ME, I can't sit 23 sentence. 23 here — at the moment I can't recall it with 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 specificity. 25 Q. Quote, "rather than evaluating and resolving 25 Q. You don't remember any of your lawyers' names' + +1 A. . Edo. 1 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? 2 Q. Besides Mr. — besides the Burman Critton firm 2 A. I believe so. 3 and Mr. Goldberger? 3 Q. What's the hourly rate? 4 A. Are you asking me for the firm, sir, or are 4 A. I don't blow, sir. 5 you asking me for the names? 5 Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? 6 Q. I want as much information as you can give me 6 A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. 7 about this clement of damage which you claim; and, that 7 Q. Arc you paying him on an hourly basis? 8 is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be 8 A. I believe so. 9 damages in this case. 9 Q. At what hourly rate? 10 A. Okay. 10 A. I don't know, sir. 12 THE WITNESS: Mr. Roy Black. 12 you paid Jay Lefkowitz? 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 A. I'm not sure, sir. /I, 14 Q. Okay. Who else? 14 Q. Do you have any idea at all? 15 A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. 15 A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. 16 Mr. Jay Lcfkowitz. The firm of Duman Critton Lutticr. 16 Q. Are you pay g him on an hourly basis? 17 That's it for the moment. 17 A. Yes, sir. 18 Q. How much have you paid the law firm of Burman 18 Q. What' tc? 19 Critton and Lutticr which you claim is damages? 19 A. I don 20 A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. 20 Q. t is nn of payment to your lawyers? 21 Q. How much? 21 H money to them? 22 A. I don't have that figure °Oland. 22 A. do }MOW, sir. 23 Q. Can you give us any better figure than 23 . PIKE: Form. 24 hundreds of thousands of dollars? 24 •. SCAROLA: 25 A. No, not sitting here today. s. Pardon me? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. And move to strike. 11 Q. How much arc you paying Jay — how much have + +1 Q. Arc you paying them on an hourly basis? A. I don't know. 2 A. Yes, sir. 7 2 Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? 3 Q. What is the hourly rate at which yo 3 A. I would guess so. 4 compensating members of the law firm? 4 Q. Who? 5 A. They're ordinary rates. 5 A. I don't know. 6 Q. What are they? 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 A. I don't know. 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 A. I'm not aware total 9 payment on your behalf? 10 Q. What is the ly rate which you're paying 10 A. With respect to that question, I'm going to 12 A. His .. . our tc. 12 Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart 1 3 Q. How , that? 13 from the money paid to lawyers? 1 4 A. I , i . 14 A. Ycs, sir. 15 eh have you paid Mr. Black which ,..).i 15 Q. What? 16 claim as es in this case? 16 A. The stress and emotional damage of imperiling 17 A. H of thousands of dollars. 17 my friendships and business relationships with no 1 8 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? 18 relevance whatsoever to these cases, brought by a firm 20 Q. What is the hourly rate? 20 in discovery to harass my friends and social contacts 21 A. I'm not —I do not know, sir. 21 with no consideration or relevance to this case 22 Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? 22 whatsoever, in an attempt to simply fleece — partly 23 A. I don't know the exact amount, sir. 23 fleece investors in South Florida out of millions of 24 Q. What's your best estimate? 24 dollars, sir. 25 A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. 25 Q. What is the value of those losses? + +8 Q. How much have you ' Mr. Goldberger? s Q. Who arc the people who arc authorized to make 1 1 Mr. Goldberger? 11 have to assert the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sit. 19 A. I believe so. 19 that whose partner sits in a Federal prison, who engaged + +1 MR. PIKE: Form. 1 MR. SCAROLA: Hopefully they will. 2 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure yet, sir. 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 4 Q. Do you have any idea at all? 4 THE WITNESS: I will respectfully decline to 5 A. Not sitting here today. 5 answer that. 6 Q. More or less than S10? 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 Q. On what basis? 8 THE WITNESS: I would guess it's more than s A. Attorney/client privilege. 9 SIO, sir. 9 MIL PIKE: And work product. 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 11 Q. More or less than a hundred? 11 Q. Any other elements of damage? 12 A. I would guess it's quite an amount of money. 12 A. Not — there might be, but sit " g here today, 13 Q. Is it more or less than a hundred? 13 I can't think of them. 14 A. Yes, sir. 14 Q. Do you have written s any of your 15 Q. Mom or less than a thousand? 15 lawyers? 16 A. I would say it's more than 150,000. 16 A. I don't know. 17 Q. More or less than a million? 17 Q. Who does 18 A. I don't know, sir. 18 A. I don't w. 19 Q. So somewhere between '50,000 and a million? 19 MR. S OLA Lets take a shop break. We 20 A. No, sir. It's not — 20 may fin' 22 witness' testimony. 22 23 THE WITNESS: No, sir. That's not what I 23 recess.) 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: :18 p.m. + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the 21 D RAPHER: We are now off the record a! 24 said. I said, I did not know. 24 DEOGRAPI IER: We are back on video record it + +1 Q. Maybe more than a million? 2 A. Maybe. 2 Q. Do you attribute all of the damages that you 3 Q. More or less than a billion? 3 have described to Mr. conduct? 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 how to proportion the conduct as opposed to 7 Q. Maybe more than a billion? 7 Mr. and his partner who sits in jail. I B A. Maybe more. s guess the U.S. Attorney will also make a decision 10 the value of that loss ' 10 to both damages and anything else he's done in this 11 MR. PIKE: y/client, work product. 11 case, sir. 12 To the ou answer without 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 disclosin ur c crsations or the conversations 13 Q. But I'm not asking you about what the U.S. 14 with o omcys that you've delineated, 14 Attorney's opinion is. 15 15 I want to know whether you hold Mr. 16 BY MR. AROLA: 16 responsible for all of those elements of damage that you 17 Q. Or ou can just take the signal and say, I 17 have described to us. 18 refuse to answer because it's attorney/client privilege. 18 A. Its a difficult question to answer, 19 A. I resent that. 19 Mr. Scarola. 20 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 20 Q. No, its easy. Yes. no, or I don't know. 21 THE WITNESS: But it's okay. You can continue 21 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, you know as well as I 22 to try to harass me, sir. It doesn't work. The 22 do, the witness is attempting to answer your 23 ladies and gentlemen of the jury, hopefully when 23 question. 24 they see the deposition will recognize and see 24 MR. SCAROLA: I don't think so. I think he's 25 these pile of tricks. The answer— 25 attempting to evade all of my questions. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 THE WITNESS: I don't know.!` 5 THE WITNESS: As a participant —I don't know 9 Q. How are you going to finding out what 9 to how much the conduct and proportion is relevant + +1 MR. PIKE: And I understand your contention. 1 the record. Mr. Scarola represents Mr. in 2 However, if you would, allow Mr. Epstein to finish 2 this case; is that correct, Mr. Scarola? 3 his response. 3 MR. That's correct. 4 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat your question? 4 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 MR. PIKE: And in this particular case, 6 Q. Do you hold Mr. responsible for all of 6 Epstein versus Rothstein, et al, Mr. who 7 the damages that you have described? 7 do you ificall represent? 8 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 8 MR. L.M. 9 THE WITNESS: It's difficult for me to 9 MR. PIKE: Okay. I believe that if you follow 10 proportion Mei:Sesta: — that I have described 10 through with questioning, you have an 11 between Mr. ,his partner, who is currently :1 irreconcilable conflict with regard to the other 12 in jail, his — the other people named in the 12 case in which you represent L.M. and L.M. 13 Complaint. Hopefully a jury will do that. 13 I cannot stop you from asking any questions; 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: .4 however, if you do move forward with asking 15 Q. Do you hold L.M. responsible for all of the :5 questions, I will take the appropriate action. 16 damages you have described? 16 MR. SCAR iiibehalf — on behalf of in> 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 17 client — 18 THE WITNESS: Again, these questions, these 18 MR. PI 19 ambiguous questions, as opposed to who 19 MR. ROL : — we do not accept your 20 participated, I would let Mr. and his 2 0 rise >. - t ethical 21 clients and his partners decide whose proportionate 21 c tt ties. 22 responsibility it is, sir. 22 t• : I That is absolutely fine for you to 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 .i I just wanted to put it on the record 24 Q. So you defer to them? 24 am, by no means, going to prevent you from 25 MR. PIKE: Form. uestioning today. However, I wanted to put my + +1 THE WITNESS: Asprionate to the 2 of damages, I think Mr. played a V anne 2 Okay. 3 role. I believe his partners potentially played 3 CROSS EXAMINATION 4 role. I've only had any contact with Mr. 4 BY MR. 5 sir. 5 Q. Mr. Epstein, is your sole basis for your claim 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 against L.M. that she changed her testimony from the 7 Q. Which partners? 7 time she testified to the FBI in 2007? B A. Beg your pardon? 8 MR. PIKE: Form. To the extent you can answer 9 Q. Which partners, bcsid r and 9 that question without invading attorney/client, 10 Mr. Rothstein, do aim en ged in conduct that 10 work product, you can do so. 11 renders them liab t u? 11 THE WITNESS: Unfortunately, rd like to 12 A. I bcli n omplaint, sir. And I 12 answer that question, but I can't do so without 13 believe it's . Adl Mr. Berger. There's Mr. Scone. 13 invading attorney/elicit privilege. 14 Mr. Fist n, are not partners. 14 BY MR. 15 • erger, Mr. Adler — and I forgot the 15 Q. Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was 16 names o others at the moment, sir, but it's in the 16 filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend 17 Complain . 17 to be false? 18 Q. Why didn't you sue them? 18 MR. PIKE: Asked and answered. 19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 THE WITNESS: I recognize, Mr. M, again. 20 THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege, sir. 20 the concept of attempting me to get to waive my 21 MR. PIKE: Work product. 21 Fifth Amendment privilege; however, in this lawsuit 22 MR. SCAROLA: I have no further questions. 22 I've answered questions with respect to your 23 MR. I have three or four questions. 23 lawsuit. And with regard to the question you just 24 That's it. 24 asked, I'm going to have to, unfortunately, assert 25 MR. PIKE: Okay. 'just want to be clear for 25 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th + +contention on the record. + +1 Amendment Right. 1 notations on the Complaint? 2 But I'm willing to listen to any other 2 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes testimony. 3 questions u ma have. 3 THE WITNESS: My testimony was, I only read 4 MR. : Finished. 4 the black letter and partially because I cannot see 5 MR. PIKE: I have a couple questions. 5 thoroughly through these glasses, sir. 6 CROSS EXAMINATION 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 BY MR. PIKE: 7 Q. Is it your contention that those glasses did 8 Q. Mr. Epstein, earlier in the deposition 8 not sufficiently correct your vision to be able to read 10 filed in the Epstein versus Rothstein, Roscnfeldt and 10 to you? i1 Adler, et al. Do you recall that? 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 A. Yes, sir. 12 THE WITNESS: Again, play this game 13 Q. And then I showed you page 2 of a Complaint 13 back and forth. What !just I think I 14 that I had my notes on, correct? 14 was very clear, that I di. notes. I 15 A. Yes. 15 said— 16 Q. Did you read the black type or did you read 16 BY MR. SCARO 17 the handwritten notes in the comers of the Complaint. 17 Q. What yo couldn't read the 18 that particular page that I showed you? 18 notes? 19 A. Unfortunately, my eyesight is not good enough 19 MR. P : Al w the witness to finish. 20 to read the notes. I only read the black letter. 20 THE : Let me finish. And what I said 21 Q. And it was that one sentence, correct? 21 w these glasses it would be almost 22 A. It was two sentences, I believe, but, yes. 22 for me to read the notes on the page. 23 MR. PIKE: Thank you. 23 AROLA: 24 We'll read. 24 es, sir. So your contention is, that those 25 REDIRECT EXAMINATION I s do not adequately correct your vision to be able + +9 Mr. Scarola was reading from page 2 of the Complain' 9 the handwritten notations on the papers that were handed + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: to read the handwritten notations; is that correct? 2 Q. What is your eyesight? 7 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 A. Sorry? 3 THE WITNESS: In this particular instance, 4 Q. What is your eyesight? 4 sir, these glasses did not. I'm not saying they 5 A. My eyesight? A 14 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Job #1358 + +CO S + +### 1 ERRATA SIIEET + +2 IN RE: EPSTEIN ET AL CR: S. TOWNS 3 DEPOSMON OF: JEFFREY EPSTEIN 4 TAKEN: 3/17/10 JOB NO.: 1358 + +6 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER 1 7 PAGE N LINEN CHANGE REASON + +t er + +18 Please forward the migim1signed errata sheet to this office so that copies may be dtstributed to all parries. + +Linder penalty of pi:May.1(1:0mo that read my 20 deposition and that it is true and correct subject to any changes in form or substance entered here. + +22 DATE: + +24 SIGNATURE OF DEPONENT: + +25 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +--- + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +January 25, 2012 +9:34 a.m. - 10:03 a.m. + +SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach Florida 33409 + +Stenographically Reported By: +Tammy Nestor, RPR + +### APPEARANCES: + +ON BEHALF OF PLADMFF: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE SEARCY, DENNF.Y, SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY. PA 'III 2139 Palm Bosch Lakes Boulevard + +1 2 3 4 S THE VIDEOCRAPHER: Today's date is January 25, 2012. The time is approximately 9:34 a.m. This is the videotaped deposition of Jeffrey Epstein in the nutter of Epstein versus West Patin Reach. Florida 33409 6 This deposition is being conducted at 2139 7 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard. West Palm Beach. 3 Florida. + +### ON BE l .NDANT: + +p E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE :RAIN, JR, ESQUIRE BURNETT. PA Sarno + +9 1 0 The cowl reporter is Tammy Nestor of Phipps Reporting. The videographer is anis 1395 Bridal! As:mm.14th Floor 11 Kennedy of Legal Video Services, Inc. in Miami, Florida 33131 12 association with Phipps Reporting. + +JACK A. GOLDBERGER. ESQUIRE 13 And will the counsel please cc + +ATTF.RBURY. GOLDBERGER a WEISS. PA 19 appearances for the record. One Oeadake Care, Suite 1400 + +250 MEWS Avenue South 15 MR. SCAROLA: My la. War Palm Beath. Florida 33401 16 I'm counsel for Brad Brad i also + +DARREN K. INDYKE. ESQUIRE 17 present. + +301 East 666 Stant/10B 18 N1R. IKNIC : Knight on behalf New York, New Yak 10065 19 oflefirey + +> 20 MR. r t LOB R: Jack Goldberger on behalf 21 ofl + +22 : Darren Indyke on behalf of 23 Ipstein. + +24 ACKERMAN: Ackerman on behalf 25 Epstein. + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 (888) 811-3408 + +.phippsreporting.com + +. . . I JETIREY ITSTEIN \*/ 2 3 Was called as a witness and alter being duly swum on oath was examined and testified as follows: 4 INATION + +### INDEX ... + +EXAMINATION: AGE + +C + +5 + +### SCAROLA: + +By Mr. Scuola 4 6 Q Would you please state your full name anti 7 your current residence address? + +> 8 A Tin Jeffrey Edward Epstein. And my 9 residence address is 6100 Red I Wok Boulevard in 10 Vugin Islands. + +### ..XH.1 -I SE TS 11 + +12 + +Q Do you maintain any other residences presently? + +LX HMI T DESCRIPTION PAGE 13 A I have vacation homes in New Mexico, Palm + +Sem:Wed Complaint in LM V. Epstein 16 14 Bach. New York. and Paris. + +15 Q Would you gh e us the address of each. 16 please. + +\ 17 A Yes. New York is 9 East 71st Street. New 18 klexico is Zorro Rand. Road. Paris is 22 Avenue 19 Fah. F-O-C-11 And where else? Palm Beach is 358 20 la Brill° Way. + +21 TIRE VIDEOGRAFIIER: Patti me, sir. + +22 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +23 111E VIDEOGRAPIIER: Meuse me. Doyen have 24 your mike on? Thanks. + +www.phippsreporting.com + +25 + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 (888) 811-3408 + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 Q Do you now or have you ever had a sexual 3 addiction? + +4 MR. KNIGHT: I'm going to instruct him not S to answer the question. That's outside of the 6 area of this abuse of process lawsuit. 7 And just to let you know, he's here to 8 answer all the questions you want relative to 9 the abuse of process. The judge has been pretty 10 clear relative to the discovery regarding any of 11 the prior sexual allegations. et cetera. And 12 just so we donl waste your time or our time, 13 I'll be consistent on that per what the judge + +14 has previously discussed regarding discovery. 15 MR. SCAROLA: Well, you and I have a very 16 different understanding of what the court's 17 prior rulings have been. Hut we'll let the 18 court deal with that. + +19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 Q Do you now or have you ever had a sexual 21 preference for minors? + +22 MR. KNIGHT: Same. + +23 BY 31R. SCAROLA: 24 Q Have you ever acted on a sexual preferente 25 for minors? + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 MR. KNIGHT: Same. + +2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 Q Have you ever Informed than 4 your legal counsel that you reference + +5 for minors? 6 MR. KNIGHT: S + +7 BY MR. SCAROIA: 8 cr !lave you rte.,. informed anyone other than 9 your legal counsel Dun you have acted on a sexual 10 preference for minors? + +11 k1R. KNIGHT: Same. + +12 B SCAROLA: 13 Q e you ever sought or received 14 mitten counseling, or treatment for any form of 1 xual addiction? + +16 MR. KNIGHT: Same + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 Q have you ever sought or revels ed 19 evaluation, counseling, or treatment for any 20 sex-related issue? + +21 MR. KNIGHT: Same. + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 Q Have you ever retained the services of a 24 consultant to assist In changing your public image 25 following your arrest on set-related charges? + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +MR. KNIGHT: Same. BY MR. SCA ROIA: + +Q Have you ever discussed with anyone undertaking an effort to change your public image following your arrest for and conviction of a sex-related crime? + +MR. KNIGIIT: Same. BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q Have you ever been convicted of a crime? A Yes. Q What was the crime of which you were convicted? + +A Two counts, one soliciting postitution, and procuring a minor for prostitutich. + +Q Did you. In fact. commit those acts? MR. GOLDBERGER: l can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege for you or you can invoke it yourself. I fer you invoke the privilege. + +TI : rm going to invoke my Fifth + +BY MR. SCAROI.A: + +Q flow many times have you solicited for utlon? + +25,4) 'm going invoke my Fifth Amendment right. + +.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 Q llow many times have you solicited a minor 2 for prostitution? + +3 A Same answer. 4 Q How many times have you solicited for 5 prostitution in the State of Florida? + +6 A Same answer. 7 Q How many times have you solicited a minor 8 for prostitution in the State of Florida? + +9 A Same answer. 10 Q How many limes have you solicited for 11 prostitution in the Virgin Islands? + +12 MIL KNIGHT: Can we stop it here just for 13 a second? Can we go off the record for one 14 minute? + +15 TIIE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 9:39. We 16 are going off the record. 17 (Thercupon, a discussion was held off the 18 record) + +19 MIL SCAROLA: I would like you to take it 20 down, please. + +21 MR. KNIGHT: Fine. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: And well go back on the 23 record. Thank you. + +24 THE VIDEOGRAPHF.R: Stand by. 25 MR. KNIGHT: I'm wondering if you have any + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 intention to ask any questions, and you may be, + 2 any questions outside of this clearly harassing + 3 area relative to issues that are outside of the + 4 four corners of the complaint or whether this + 5 is just going to be a continuance of questions + 6 of this witness that have no other means of + 7 advancing this lawsuit but only have means of + 8 doing other things of which I won't -- I don't + 9 care to list them here. Do you plan to go into + 10 other areas? + +11 **MR. SCAROLA:** I am -- I am planning on + 12 taking a very thorough and comprehensive + 13 deposition of Mr. Epstein. + +14 **MR. KNIGHT:** Are you asking -- planning to + 15 ask any questions that are not sexual or + 16 criminal in nature? + +17 **MR. SCAROLA:** ■ I'm sure there will be + 18 many that you would probably not consider + 19 sexual or criminal in nature, but I don't know. + +20 **MR. KNIGHT:** Let's proceed for a little + 21 while, see what we can do, because certainly we + 22 have taken the time out to come up here, + 23 people's schedules have been made, et cetera, + 24 people have traveled long distances, but we may + 25 have to quit and go to the court. + +www.phippsreporting.com + (888) 811-3408 + +1 for prostitution with respect to the claim on which + 2 you were convicted? + +3 A Same answer. + +4 **Q** Who is the minor that you solicited for + 5 prostitution with respect to the claim on which you + 6 pled guilty? + +7 A Same answer. + +8 **Q** Did you, in fact, plead guilty to + 9 soliciting for prostitution? + +10 **MR. KNIGHT:** Asked and answered. + +11 **THE WITNESS:** Yes, sir. + +12 **BY MR. SCAROLA:** + +13 **Q** Did you, in fact, plead guilty to + 14 soliciting a minor for prostitution? + +15 A No. + +16 **Q** Where was it that you solicited for + 17 prostitution in the manner -- in the matter in which + 18 you pled guilty? + +19 A Same answer. + +20 **Q** When was it that you solicited for + 21 prostitution in the matter in which you pled guilty? + +22 A Same answer. + +23 **Q** Have you ever discussed your sex-related + 24 arrest or conviction with any reporter or news media + 25 representative? + +www.phippsreporting.com + (888) 811-3408 + +1 **BY MR. SCAROLA:** + +2 **Q** Have your ever solicited for prostitution + 3 in the Virgin Islands? + +4 A Same answer. + +5 **Q** That is that the -- you are invoking your + 6 Fifth Amendment -- + +7 A Yes. + +8 **Q** -- right? + +9 A Yes, Mr. Scarola. + +10 **Q** Have you ever solicited for prostitution + 11 in New York? + +12 A Same answer. + +13 **Q** Have you ever solicited for prostitution + 14 in new Mexico? + +15 A Same answer. + +16 **Q** Have you ever solicited for prostitution + 17 in Paris? + +18 A Same answer. + +19 **Q** Have you ever solicited for prostitution + 20 anywhere at any time? + +21 A Same answer. + +22 **Q** Have you ever solicited a minor for + 23 prostitution anywhere at any time? + +24 A Same answer. + +25 **Q** Who is the prostitute that you solicited + +www.phippsreporting.com + (888) 811-3408 + +1 **MR. KNIGHT:** I'm going to instruct you not + 2 to answer the question. + +3 **MR. SCAROLA:** And what is the basis of + 4 that instruction? + +5 **MR. KNIGHT:** What is the basis? + +6 **MR. SCAROLA:** Yes. + +7 **MR. KNIGHT:** What does it have to do with + 8 this lawsuit? It's for no other reason other + 9 than to harass him. There are plenty of areas + 10 you can go into which are reasonable. We are + 11 here. + +12 **MR. SCAROLA:** So the objection is + 13 relevancy, is that correct? + +14 **MR. KNIGHT:** No, it goes beyond relevancy. + +15 **MR. SCAROLA:** Well, what is it then? + +16 **MR. KNIGHT:** Well, it is harassing. It is + 17 used -- it is being used to intimidate the + 18 witness. It is being used for various + 19 different reasons. And I believe it is + 20 improper. + +21 **BY MR. SCAROLA:** + +22 **Q** Have you ever discussed your sex-related + 23 activities with minors in the State of Florida with + 24 any reporter or news media representative? + +25 **MR. KNIGHT:** Same instruction. We are + +www.phippsreporting.com + (888) 811-3408 + +1 going to take a quick break if we can goon' that your clicm has filed an action to set + +2 the record. 2 aside the non-prosecution agreement that + +3 T11E VIDEOGRAPHER: The lime is 9i0 — 3 Mr. Epstein is a party to. + +4 9:40. We are going off the record. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Would you please mark this + +S (Thereupon, a recess was taken at 5 as Exhibit No. I to this deposition. + +6 9:43 am.) 6 MR. KNIGHT: As soon as you get thc + +7 THE VIDF.OGRAPIIER: The lime is 9:50 a.m. 7 sticker on it. ril look at that one. + +8 We are back on the record. 8 (Thereupon. Deposition Exhibit No. I was + +9 MR. IGNIGIIT: As I mentioned earlier, we 9 marked for identification.) 11 lawsuit that is at issue. :1 mistook).0 or in their pocket? + +10 are here to answer questions relevant to the :0 THE VIDEADGRAPHER: Is someone's phone by a + +12 Relative to your question earlier and the :2 MR. GOLDBERGER: Ian 14 appropriate, but I'm going to have :4 the side, please. + +13 instruction not to answer, I do believe it was : 3 THE YIDEOGRAPHER: If can put it to + +15 Mr. Goldberger address what be believes the — :5 MR. GOLDBERG ' ova 16 is 0se — our client is entitled to, but at the :6 here. + +17 same lime, there are other issues we want to put 17 MR. KNIGHT 18 on the record. 18 MR. GOLD G it off. + +19 I will allow you to ask more questions. but 19 MR. KN1GH Okay Thank you. 20 if it's going to stay on this line, we may have 20 RN' MR. SCAROLA:, + +21 to adjourn. 21 Q You have beeri handed a copy of what's been + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay. This is Jack 22 ■rked **as Es hibit No. I to this deposition. It is a** + +**23 Goldberger. A Couple issues. Fat, as CO the 23 y of Plaintiff sThird Amended Complaint in a** + +**24 questions that, Mr. Scarola, you asked 24 led LM venus Jeffrey Epstein.** + +**2 r: contaningecoveratiOns that Mr. Epstein may** + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +25 t you seen this document before? + +.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 or may not have had with. I believe .' 2 it as news reporters or news media. 2 Q Do you recall having been sued by 3 invoking Filth Amendment 4 questions in addition to the o 4 Identified by the Initials I ./11? 5 by Mr. Knight. 5 A Yes. sir. + +1 y 1 + +A Not to the bat of my recollection, no. + +to 3 on behalf of an individual who was + +6 MR. KNIGHT: I'm . g the 6 Q And Is this one of the cases that you 7 instruction. 7 contend was abusively prosecuted by + +8 MR. GOLDFIER(;Ell : Okay. All right. Anyhow 8 A fm net sure if this is the exact 9 he's invoking Fifth Amendment privileges as to 9 complaint. 10 that line of questioning. 10 Q Well, is this the case? + +11 A. In ilk. to:.,I line of questioning where 11 A I don't know. + +12 are asking Mr. Epstein about sex-related 12 Q Which ease Is It that you contend + +13 issum. as you know, your client, Mr. M. 13 abusively prosecuted against you? + +14 ' s tiled a lawsuit in federal court where he is 14 A It was the LM cast. I don't know if this + +1 seeking to overturn the non•prosccution 15 is the specific case. + +16 ages-mem that Mr. Epstein is a party to. 16 Q Well, I want you to WOW that there Is a. + +17 I believe that you are asking these 17 only one 1111 ease that was Med by 18 questions in an effort to further Mr. 18 against you. + +19 attempts to set aside tut gum-prosecution 19 A That's correct. + +20 apt:malt, and I think it serves no purpose 20 Q Do you have any recollection that is at + +21 other than to assist your client in that 21 odds with that assumption? + +22 laWSUit. And I just think it's totally outside 22 A Yes. I do. + +23 the realm of the discovery that is allowed in 23 Q You have a recollection that there was, in + +24 this case. And I'm simply not going to allow my 24 fact, a federal coon case as well as a state court + +25 client to answer those questions given the fact + +www.phippsreporting.com + +25 case, correct? + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 (888) 811-3408 + +9 10 11 12 13 14 1 MR. KNIGHT: Okay. 2 MR. SCAROLA: — that'si 3 the witness, Mr. Knight 4 MR. KNIGHT: I'm 5 MR. SCAROLA: 6 objecting on the basis legal conclusion, that's fi B like the w' instructing him MG to C hlk. S IA: for a now I would er unless you are 0 MCI. fm 004 instructing him not Q Okay. Then would you please answer the wtiou? 1 A I'm cony. Would you repeat it? 16 Q Yes, sir. Is it your contention that 17 abusively prosecuted the federal 18 court action on behalf of EM? 19 A Yes, sir. 20 Q How? 21 A filed a 234-count federal 22 complaint in conjunction with his partner Scott 23 Rothstein to enable his partners at RRA to defraud 24 south Florida investors of millions of dollars. 25 His partner Scott Rothstein and his partner 4 + +1 A Correct. 2 Q All right. Now, is It your - 3 A I believe that's — Q Is it your contention — 5 MR. KNIGHT: Finish your answer. Did you 6 finish your answer? 7 THE WITNESS: That's all right. 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 Q Is it your contention that 10 MR. KNIGHT: And any time you want 11 finish your answer, please do so. 12 THE WITNESS: Sure. 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 Q Is it your contention that 15 abusively prosecuted the state court case on behalf 16 of LAI? 17 A I don't know. Sony. 18 Q Is it your contention that 19 abusively prosecuted the federal court case on 20 behalf of LAI? 21 MR. KNIGHT: Objection, asks for legal 22 conclusions. Obviously there were lawsuits 23 that were raised in this case. 24 MR. SCAROLA: You don't need to make a 25 speaking objection — + +(888) 811-3408 www.phippsreporting.com + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1Mr. Adler have excuse me. Mr. Rothstein has now in 2deposition admitted that they needed to file a complaint to 3 show investors that there was real action, in 4 ?dr. Rothgeirfs words, going on in federal court. The 5 investors had not been able to find a filed complaint and 6 had complained to Mr. Rothstein that there was no filed 7complaints two days. excuse me. before Mr. filed 8 the federal complaint foe 234. 9Q Were you ever served with that complaint? 10 A Not to the best of my recollection. :1 Q So one contention Is that Mr. 12abusively prosecuted a federal court action on 13 behalf of LM with which you were r served, 14 correct? 15 A had -- I was notified 16 in fact. filed. 17 Q But you nitre with the case, 18 correct? 19 A I was [Notified that the ease was filed. 20 Q But you were more seated with the Cale, 21 correct? 22 A Not to the hest of my recollection. 23 tj Okay. What damage did you Incur as 24 - consequence of the filing of a complaint nit!, which 25 You were never served? + +.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 A Uncured many legal -- much legal fees, 2 many legal fees, in fact, to try to figure out 3 why -- what was going on and, in fact, getting 4prepared to defend the case though I had not yet 5 been served. 6 Q Were the allegations in the federal 7complaint on behalf of I.51 any different than the 8 allegations in the state court case on behalf of I.M? 9 A I don't recall. 10 Q Did you, in fact, engage in any sexual 11 conduct with LM? 12 A I'm sorry, but I'm sure the jury is 13 going to recognize this is simply meant to harass 14 MC, and I'll have to take the Fifth Amendment since 15 your client, Mr. M, is trying to overturn my 16 prosecution agreement. 17 Q How many times did you engage in sexual 18 conduct with JIM? 19 A Pm going to have to invoke my Fifth 20 Amendment right again, sir. 21 Q Do you know who b? 22 A Again Pm going to sawn my right. 23 MR. KNIGHT: We are going to go off the 24 record and take another break. 25 THE VIDF.OGRAPHER: The time is 9:58. We + +www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 + +1 are going off the record. Mr. Epstein as pan of an ongoing and continuous 2 (Thereupon. a recess was taken at 2 course of conduct supportive of claims for 3 9:58 ant) 3 punitive damages against Mr. Epstein and 4 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:00. We 4 supportive of RICO claims against him. 5 arc on the record. 5 And had this deposition been pemiitted to 6 MR. KNIGHT: Okay. We have asked on 6 continue, we would have covered each of those 7 several occasions dud you ask questions that 7 areas and substantially more. 8 arc relevant to the lawsuit at bar. There have 9 MR. KNIGHT: Thank you. 10 You are back into the sexual stuff which we 10 me going off the recent 11 feel is inappropriate, and also relative to the 11 (Thereupon, the deposition was adjourned at 12 issues that were raised by Mr. Goldberger. 12 10:03 a.m.) 13 As such, we an: going to roccss and ask 13 \_ .. 14 further direction from the court on what is 14 Ainalli 15 allowable and what is not allowable in this 15 16 deposition. 16 17 hIR.SCAROIA: So you are tenninating the 17 18 deposition at this time? 18 19 MR. KNIGHT: We arc recessing the 19 20 deposition to get di from the court. 20 21 MR. SCAROIA: Until when? 21 22 AIR. KNIGIff: We will find out what the 22 23 courtays. 23 24 hIR.SCAROLA: When? Arc you contacting 24 25 the judge right now? + +9 been some questions that were getting to it. 9 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:03. We CO S c 25 + +www.phippsreporting.com + +.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 (888) 811-3408 + +1 MR. KNIGHT: lam not. Vt710 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 2 file an appropriate notion and %IR 3 take it to thc judge and see what he dn.-:. STATE OF FLORIDA 4 Thank you. COUNTY OF BROWARD 5 MR. SCAROLA: that the record it, clear, 10 whit elk hat Mr. has requested, and that the transcript is a true record of 11 a prosecuted that claim. my stenographic notes 12 know about the connection between I fiuther certify that I am not a relative, employee, attorney, or counsel of any of the panics. 13 14 tem and each one of those alleged 1 w o had information concerning the events that 16 arc alleged in those complaints, every Dated this 25th day of 1 2012. 17 individual who was in a position to have 18 possibly had information about the events .—...---- 19 alleged in those complaints. T OR, RPR 20 I want to ask this witness about every 21 person whose deposition was taken and scheduled 22 to be taken, the relationship of those persons 23 to Mr. Epstein, knowledge that those persons may 24 have with respect to Mr. Epstein's activities 25 with minors, other crimes committed by + +6 it is my intention to as ifie I, TAMMY NESTOR, Registered Professional 7 questions about everyfad 11i tion Reporter, do hereby certify that I was authorized to and 8 included in cv m brought by Mr. did stenographically report the foregoing deposition of 9 on behalf of v m in every case in JEFFREY EPSTEIN, that a review of the transcript was I want to know about every individual nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties' attorneys or counsel connected with the action, nor am I financially interested in the action. + +www.phippsreporting.com www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 (888) 811-3408 + +CERTIFICATE OF OATH + +STATE OF FLORIDA +COUNTY OF BROWARD + +I, the undersigned authority, certify that +JEFFREY EPSTEIN personally appeared before me and was +duly sworn. + +Witness my hand and official seal this 25th +day of January 2012. + +![]()![](_page_46_Picture_36.jpeg) + +Tammy NESTOR, Court Reporter +Notary Public, State of Florida +Commission No.: EE 133933 +Commission Exp. Date: 10/23/2015 + +1 ERRATA SHEET +2 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT +3 ENTER CHANGES ON THIS PAGE + +4 In Re: Epstein v [redacted] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +JEFFREY EPSTEIN +January 25, 2012 + +| PAGE | LINE | CHANGE | REASON | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------| +| 8 | | | | +| 9 | | | | +| 10 | | | | +| 11 | | | | +| 12 | | | | +| 13 | | | | +| 14 | | | | +| 15 | | | | +| 16 | | | | +| 17 | | | | +| 18 | | | | +| 19 | | | | +| 20 | | | | +| 21 | Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing document and that the facts stated in it are true. | | | +| 22 | | | | +| 23 | | | | +| 24 | DATE | JEFFREY EPSTEIN | | +| 25 | | | | + +www.phippsreporting.com +(888) 811-3408 + +www.phippsreporting.com +(888) 811-3408 + +January 25, 2012 +[redacted] BURNETT, PA +1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor +Miami, Florida 33131 +ATTN: [redacted] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE + +Re: Epstein v [redacted] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Please take notice that on the January 25, 2012, you gave your deposition in the above cause. At that time you did not waive your signature. The transcript is now available for your review. + +Please call (888) 811-3408 or email production@phippsreporting.com to schedule and appointment between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, for you to have access on your computer to a read-only version of the transcript. + +If you are a party in this action and your attorney has ordered a copy of this transcript, you may wish to read their copy of the transcript. In that event, please execute the Errata Sheet, which can be found at the back of the transcript and return it to us for distribution to all parties. + +If you do not read and sign the deposition within thirty (30) days, the original, which has already been forwarded to the ordering attorney, may be filed with the Clerk of the Court. + +If you wish to waive your signature now, please sign your name in the blank at the bottom of this letter and return it to us. + +Very truly yours, +TAMMY NESTOR, RPR +Phipps Reporting, Inc. +1615 Forum Place, Suite 500 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +I do hereby waive my signature. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +www.phippsreporting.com +(888) 811-3408 + +| A | | 23:7 | 15:19 16:2 | 22:8 | 2:9 27:2 | +|-----------------------|--|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------| +| a.m (8) | | allegations (3) | asked (3) | BARNHART ... | C | +| 1:13,13 4:3 14:6 | | 6:11 21:6,8 | 12:10 14:24 | 1:16 2:4 | call (1) | +| 14:7 22:3 | | alleged (4) | 22:6 | basis (3) | 27:8 | +| 24:12 27:9 | | 23:10,13,16,19 | asking (3) | 13:3,5 19:6 | called (1) | +| able (1) | | allow (2) | 10:14 15:12,17 | Beach (11) | 5:2 | +| 20:5 | | 14:19 15:24 | asks (1) | 1:1,16,17 2:5,5 | calls (1) | +| abuse (2) | | allowable (2) | 18:21 | 2:13 4:7,7 5:14 | 19:6 | +| 6:6,9 | | 22:15,15 | assert (1) | 5:19 27:22 | care (1) | +| abusively (7) | | allowed (1) | 21:22 | behalf (14) | 10:9 | +| 17:7,13 18:15 | | 15:23 | assist (2) | 2:2,7 4:18,20,22 | case (22) | +| 18:19 19:17 | | Amended (2) | 7:24 15:21 | 4:24 17:3 | 1:2 15:24 16:24 | +| 20:12 23:11 | | 3:12 16:23 | association (1) | 18:15,20 19:18 | 17:10,12,14,15 | +| access (1) | | Amendment (8) | 4:12 | 20:13 21:7,8 | 17:17,24,25 | +| 27:10 | | 8:17,21,25 11:6 | assume (1) | 23:9 | 18:15,19,23 | +| Ackerman (3) | | 15:3,9 21:14 | 17:16 | believe (5) | 20:15,17,19,20 | +| 2:8 4:24,24 | | 21:20 | assumption (1) | 15:1,17 18:3 | 21:4,8 23:9 | +| acted (2) | | announce (1) | 17:21 | believes (1) | 27:5 28:4 | +| 6:24 7:9 | | 4:13 | attempts (1) | 14:15 | cases (1) | +| action (7) | | answer (26) | 15:19 | best (3) | 17:6 | +| 16:1 19:18 20:3 | | 6:5,8 9:3,6,9 | ATTERBUR... | 17:1 20:10,22 | cause (1) | +| 20:12 25:15,16 | | 11:4,12,15,18 | 2:12 | 17:1 20:10,22 | cause (1) | +| 27:11 | | 11:21,24 12:3 | ATTN (1) | beyond (1) | 27:6 | +| activities (2) | | 12:7,19,22 | 27:3 | 13:14 | Centre (1) | +| 13:23 23:24 | | 13:2 14:10,13 | attorney (3) | blank (1) | 2:12 | +| acts (1) | | 15:25 18:5,6 | 25:13 27:11,16 | 27:18 | certainly (1) | +| 8:15 | | 18:11 19:8,9 | attorneys (1) | bottom (1) | 10:21 | +| addiction (2) | | 19:11,13 | 25:15 | 27:18 | CERTIFICA... | +| 6:3 7:15 | | answered (1) | Australian (1) | Boulevard (4) | 25:1 26:1 | +| addition (1) | | 12:10 | 2:13 | 1:16 2:5 4:7 5:9 | certify (3) | +| 15:4 | | appearances (2) | authority (1) | Brad (2) | 25:7,12 26:6 | +| address (4) | | 2:1 4:14 | 26:6 | 4:16,16 | cetera (2) | +| 5:7,9,15 14:15 | | appeared (1) | authorized (1) | [REDACTED] (10) | 6:11 10:23 | +| adjourn (1) | | 26:7 | 25:7 | 1:7 17:2,7,12,17 | change (2) | +| 14:21 | | appointment (1) | available (1) | 18:9,14,18 | 8:4 28:7 | +| adjourned (1) | | 27:9 | 27:7 | 19:17,21 | CHANGES (1) | +| 24:11 | | appropriate (2) | Avenue (4) | break (2) | 28:2 | +| Adler (1) | | 14:14 23:2 | 2:10,13 5:18 | 14:1 21:24 | changing (1) | +| 20:1 | | approximatel... | 27:2 | Brickell (2) | 7:24 | +| admitted (1) | | 4:2 | | 2:10 27:2 | charges (1) | +| 20:2 | | area (2) | B (1) | Brillo (1) | 7:25 | +| advancing (1) | | 6:6 10:3 | 3:8 | 5:20 | Chris (1) | +| 10:7 | | areas (3) | 3:8 | brought (1) | 4:10 | +| agreement (4) | | 10:10 13:9 24:7 | back (4) | 23:8 | [REDACTED] (3) | +| 15:16,20 16:2 | | arrest (3) | 9:22 14:8 22:10 | BROWARD (2) | 2:8 4:18 27:3 | +| 21:16 | | 7:25 8:5 12:24 | 27:13 | 25:4 26:4 | CIRCUIT (2) | +| allegation (1) | | aside (2) | bar (1) | BURNETT (2) | 1:1,1 | + +| claim (4)
12:1,5 23:8,11 | conducted (1)
4:6 | 4:13,16 7:4,9
25:13,15 | 25:17 26:10
days (2)
20:7 27:15 | 5:2 26:8 | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| claims (2)
24:2,4 | conjunction (1)
19:22 | counseling (2)
7:14,19 | deal (1)
6:18 | E | +| clear (2)
6:10 23:5 | connected (1)
25:15 | counts (1)
8:13 | declare (1)
28:21 | E (4)
2:8 3:1,8 27:3 | +| Clearlake (1)
2:12 | connection (1)
23:12 | COUNTY (3)
1:1 25:4 26:4 | defend (1)
21:4 | earlier (2)
14:9,12 | +| clearly (1)
10:2 | consequence (1)
20:24 | couple (1)
14:23 | defend (1)
21:4 | East (2)
2:15 5:17 | +| Clerk (1)
27:16 | consider (1)
10:18 | course (1)
24:2 | DEFENDAN...
2:7 | Edward (1)
5:8 | +| client (6)
14:16 15:13,21
15:25 16:1
21:15 | consistent (1)
6:13 | court (18)
1:1 4:9 6:18
10:25 15:14 | Defendant(s) (...
1:9 | [REDACTED] (19)
1:7 4:5,16 15:13
17:3,7,13,17 | +| coach (1)
19:2 | consultant (1)
7:24 | court (18)
1:1 4:9 6:18
10:25 15:14 | defraud (1)
19:23 | [REDACTED] (19)
18:14,18 19:17
19:21 20:7,11 | +| coach (1)
19:2 | contacting (1)
22:24 | court (18)
18:19 19:18
20:4,12 21:8 | DENNEY (2)
1:16 2:4 | [REDACTED] (19)
21:15 23:8,10
27:4 28:3 | +| come (1)
10:22 | contend (2)
17:7,12 | court's (1)
6:16 | deposition (17)
1:10 4:3,6 10:13
16:5,8,22 20:2 | [REDACTED] (1)
15:18 | +| Commission (2)
26:14,14 | contention (6)
18:4,9,14,18
19:16 20:11 | court's (1)
6:16 | different (3)
6:16 13:19 21:7 | EE (1)
26:14 | +| commit (1)
8:15 | continuance (1)
10:5 | covered (1)
24:6 | DESCRIPTI...
3:11 | effort (2)
8:4 15:18 | +| committed (1)
23:25 | continue (1)
24:6 | crime (3)
8:6,9,11 | different (3)
6:16 13:19 21:7 | El (1)
5:20 | +| complained (1)
20:6 | continuous (1)
24:1 | crimes (1)
23:25 | direction (2)
22:14,20 | email (1)
27:8 | +| complaint (11)
3:12 10:4 16:23
17:9 19:22
20:2,5,8,9,24
21:7 | conversations ...
14:25 | criminal (2)
10:16,19
5:7 | discovery (3)
6:10,14 15:23 | employee (2)
25:13,14 | +| complaints (3)
20:7 23:16,19 | conviction (2)
8:5 12:24 | current (1)
5:7 | discussed (4)
6:14 8:3 12:23
13:22 | enable (1)
19:23 | +| comprehensiv...
10:12 | copy (4)
16:21,23 27:12
27:12 | | discussion (1)
9:17 | engage (2)
21:10,17 | +| computer (1)
27:10 | corners (1)
10:4 | D (1)
3:1 | distances (1)
10:24 | ENTER (1)
28:2 | +| concerning (2)
14:25 23:15 | correct (7)
13:13 17:19,25
18:1 20:14,18
20:21 | damage (1)
20:23 | distribution (1)
27:13 | Epstein (28)
1:4,10 3:12 4:4
4:4,19,21,23 | +| conclusion (1)
19:7 | corners (1)
10:4 | Darren (2)
2:14 4:22 | document (2)
16:25 28:21 | [REDACTED] (19)
4:25 5:1,8
10:13 14:25 | +| conclusions (1)
18:22 | correct (7)
13:13 17:19,25
18:1 20:14,18
20:21 | date (3)
4:1 26:14 28:24 | doing (1)
10:8 | [REDACTED] (19)
15:12,16 16:3
16:24 23:13,23 | +| conduct (3)
21:11,18 24:2 | couched (1)
15:1 | Dated (1)
25:17 | dollars (1)
19:24 | [REDACTED] (19)
24:1,3 25:9
26:7 27:4,25 | +| counsel (6) | counsel (6) | day (2) | duly (2) | | + +| 28:3,4,24 | 18:19 19:17,21 | form (1) | 22:12 | 23:15,18 | +|-----------------------|------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------| +| Epstein's (1) | 20:4,8,12 21:6 | 7:14 | guilty (5) | informed (2) | +| 23:24 | | Forum (1) | 12:6,8,13,18,21 | 7:3,8 | +| Errata (2) | 22:11 | 27:21 | | initials (1) | +| 27:13 28:1 | | forwarded (1) | H | 17:4 | +| Espirito (1) | 21:1,2 | 27:16 | H (1) | instruct (2) | +| 2:9 | | found (1) | 3:8 | 6:4 13:1 | +| ESQUIRE (6) | 8:16,20,25 11:6 | 27:13 | hand (1) | instructing (2) | +| 2:3,8,8,11,14 | 15:3,9 21:14 | four (1) | 26:9 | 19:9,10 | +| 27:3 | 21:19 | 10:4 | handed (1) | instruction (4) | +| et (2) | figure (1) | [REDACTED] (2) | 16:21 | 13:4,25 14:13 | +| 6:11 10:23 | 21:2 | 2:9 27:2 | harass (2) | 15:7 | +| evaluation (2) | file (2) | Friday (1) | 13:9 21:13 | intended (1) | +| 7:14,19 | 20:2 23:2 | 27:10 | harassing (2) | 19:2 | +| event (1) | filed (10) | full (1) | 10:2 13:16 | intention (2) | +| 27:12 | 15:14 16:1 | 5:6 | held (1) | 10:1 23:6 | +| events (2) | 17:17 19:21 | further (3) | 9:17 | interested (1) | +| 23:15,18 | 20:5,6,7,16,19 | 15:18 22:14 | homes (1) | 25:16 | +| exact (1) | 27:16 | 25:12 | 5:13 | intimidate (1) | +| 17:8 | filing (1) | | Hook (1) | 13:17 | +| EXAMINATIL... | 20:24 | G | 5:9 | investors (3) | +| 3:3 5:4 | financially (1) | getting (2) | hours (1) | 19:24 20:3,5 | +| examined (1) | 25:16 | 21:3 22:9 | 27:9 | invoke (6) | +| 5:3 | find (2) | give (1) | | 8:16,17,18,20 | +| excuse (3) | 20:5 22:22 | 5:15 | I | 8:25 21:19 | +| 5:23 20:1,7 | fine (2) | given (1) | identification ... | invoking (3) | +| execute (1) | 9:21 19:7 | 15:25 | 16:9 | 11:5 15:3,9 | +| 27:13 | finish (3) | go (7) | identified (1) | Islands (3) | +| Exhibit (4) | 18:5,6,11 | 9:13,22 10:9,25 | 17:4 | 5:10 9:11 11:3 | +| 3:11 16:5,8,22 | First (1) | 13:10 14:1 | image (2) | issue (2) | +| Exp (1) | 14:23 | 21:23 | 7:24 8:4 | 7:20 14:11 | +| 26:14 | Floor (2) | goes (1) | improper (1) | issues (5) | +| | 2:10 27:2 | 13:14 | 13:20 | 10:3 14:17,23 | +| F | Florida (15) | going (23) | inappropriate... | 15:13 22:12 | +| F-O-C-H (1) | 1:1,17 2:5,10,13 | 6:4 8:20,25 9:16 | 22:11 | | +| 5:19 | 4:8 9:5,8 13:23 | 10:5 13:1 14:1 | included (1) | J | +| fact (9) | 19:24 25:3 | 14:4,14,20 | 23:8 | J (1) | +| 8:15 12:8,13 | 26:3,13 27:3 | 15:24 19:4 | incur (1) | 1:7 | +| 15:25 17:24 | 27:22 | 20:4 21:3,13 | 20:23 | Jack (5) | +| 20:16 21:2,3 | | 21:19,22,23 | incurred (1) | 2:3,11 4:15,20 | +| 21:10 | Foch (1) | 22:1,13 23:1,2 | 21:1 | 14:22 | +| facts (1) | 5:19 | 24:10 | individual (3) | January (7) | +| 28:21 | following (2) | Goldberger (13) | 17:3 23:14,17 | 1:12 4:2 25:17 | +| factual (1) | follows (1) | 2:11,12 4:20,20 | individually (3) | 26:10 27:1,6 | +| 23:7 | 5:3 | 8:16 14:15,22 | 1:7,7,8 | 28:5 | +| federal (9) | foregoing (2) | 14:23 15:8 | Indyke (3) | Jeffrey (15) | +| 15:14 17:24 | 25:8 28:21 | 16:12,15,18 | 2:14 4:22,22 | 1:4,10 4:4,19,21 | +| | | | information (2) | | + +| 4:23,25 5:1,8
16:24 25:9
26:7 27:25
28:4,24
(2)
2:8 4:24
JR (1)
2:8
judge (4)
6:9,13 22:25
23:3
JUDICIAL (1)
1:1
jury (1)
21:12 | 1:16 2:5 4:7
lawsuit (7)
6:6 10:7 13:8
14:11 15:14,22
22:8
lawsuits (1)
18:22
legal (8)
4:11 7:4,9 18:21
19:7 21:1,1,2
Let's (1)
10:20
letter (1)
27:18
line (4)
14:20 15:10,11
28:7
list (1)
10:9
little (1)
10:20
LM (14)
3:12 16:24 17:4
17:14,17 18:16
18:20 19:18
20:13 21:7,8
21:11,18,21
long (1)
10:24
look (1)
16:7

M
intain (1)
5:11
manner (1)
12:17
mark (1)
16:4
marked (2)
16:9,22
matter (3)
4:4 12:17,21
means (2)
10:6,7
meant (1)
21:13 | media (3)
12:24 13:24
15:2
mentioned (1)
14:9
Mexico (3)
5:13,18 11:14
Miami (2)
2:10 27:3
microphone (1)
16:11
mike (1)
5:24
millions (1)
19:24
Mine (1)
16:17
minor (6)
8:14 9:1,7 11:22
12:4,14
minors (6)
6:21,25 7:5,10
13:23 23:25
minute (1)
9:14
Monday (1)
27:10
motion (1)
23:2

N
N (1)
3:1
name (3)
4:15 5:6 27:18
nature (2)
10:16,19
need (1)
18:24
needed (1)
20:2
Nestor (6)
1:21 4:9 25:6,19
26:13 27:20
never (4)
20:13,17,20,25
new (8) | 2:15,15 5:13,14
5:17,17 11:11
11:14
news (4)
12:24 13:24
15:2,2
non-prosecuti...
15:15,19 16:2
Notary (1)
26:13
notes (1)
25:11
notice (1)
27:6
notified (2)
20:15,19

O
oath (2)
5:2 26:1
object (1)
19:4
objecting (1)
19:6
objection (4)
13:12 15:4
18:21,25
Obviously (1)
18:22
occasions (1)
22:7
odds (1)
17:21
official (1)
26:9
(1)
Okay (7)
14:22 15:8
16:19 19:1,13
20:23 22:6
ongoing (1)
24:1
ordered (1)
27:12
ordering (1)
27:16 | original (1)
27:15
outside (4)
6:5 10:2,3 15:22
overturn (2)
15:15 21:15 | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| P | | | | | +| | | p.m (1)
27:10
PA (5)
1:16 2:4,9,12
27:2
PAGE (4)
3:3,11 28:2,7
Palm (11)
1:1,16,17 2:5,5
2:13 4:7,7 5:13
5:19 27:22
Pardon (1)
5:21
Paris (3)
5:14,18 11:17
part (1)
24:1
parties (2)
25:13 27:14
parties' (1)
25:14
partner (3)
19:22,25,25
partners (1)
19:23
party (3)
15:16 16:3
27:11
penalties (1)
28:21
people (1)
10:24
people's (1)
10:23
perjury (1)
28:21
permitted (1)
24:5
person (1) | | | + +| 23:21 | 4:17 | Q | | 17:1,20,23 | retained (1) | +|------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--|--------------------------|------------------------| +| personally (1) | presently (1) | question (4) | | 20:10,22 | 7:23 | +| 26:7 | 5:12 | 6:5 13:2 14:12 | | record (15) | return (2) | +| persons (2) | pretty (1) | 19:14 | | 4:14 9:13,16,18 | 27:13,18 | +| 23:22,23 | 6:9 | questioning (2) | | 9:23 14:2,4,8 | review (2) | +| Phipps (3) | previously (1) | 15:10,11 | | 14:18 21:24 | 25:9 27:7 | +| 4:10,12 27:21 | 6:14 | questions (14) | | 22:1,5 23:5 | RICO (1) | +| phone (1) | 6:11,17 | 6:8 10:1,2,5,15 | | 24:10 25:10 | 24:4 | +| 16:10 | | 14:10,19,24 | | | right (9) | +| Place (1) | privilege (2) | 15:4,18,25 | | 5:9 | 8:21,25 11:8 | +| 27:21 | 8:17,19 | 22:7,9 23:7 | | regarding (2) | 15:8 18:2,7 | +| PLAINTIFF (1) | privileges (2) | quick (1) | | 6:10,14 | 21:20,22 22:25 | +| 2:2 | 15:3,9 | 14:1 | | Registered (1) | Road (1) | +| Plaintiff's (1) | probably (1) | quit (1) | | 25:6 | 5:18 | +| 16:23 | 10:18 | 10:25 | | relationship (1) | Rothstein (5) | +| Plaintiff(s) (1) | proceed (1) | | | 23:22 | 1:7 19:23,25 | +| 1:5 | 10:20 | | | relative (7) | 20:1,6 | +| plan (1) | process (2) | R | | 6:8,10 10:3 | Rothstein's (1) | +| 10:9 | 6:6,9 | raised (3) | | 14:12 22:11 | 20:4 | +| planning (2) | procuring (1) | 15:4 18:23 | | 25:12,14 | RPR (3) | +| 10:11,14 | 8:14 | 22:12 | | relevancy (2) | 1:21 25:19 | +| Plaza (1) | production@... | Ranch (1) | | 13:13,14 | 27:20 | +| 2:9 | 27:9 | 5:18 | | relevant (2) | RRA (1) | +| plead (2) | Professional (1) | read (3) | | 14:10 22:8 | 19:23 | +| 12:8,13 | 25:6 | 27:12,15 28:21 | | repeat (1) | rulings (1) | +| please (12) | prosecuted (7) | read-only (1) | | 19:15 | 6:17 | +| 4:13 5:6,16 9:20 | 17:7,13 18:15 | real (1) | | report (1) | | +| 16:4,14 18:11 | 18:19 19:17 | 20:3 | | 25:8 | | +| 19:13 27:6,8 | 20:12 23:11 | realm (1) | | Reported (1) | S (1) | +| 27:12,17 | prosecution (1) | 15:23 | | 1:21 | 3:8 | +| pled (3) | 21:16 | reason (2) | | reporter (6) | Santo (1) | +| 12:6,18,21 | prostitute (1) | 13:8 28:7 | | 4:9 12:24 13:24 | 2:9 | +| plenty (1) | 11:25 | reasonable (1) | | 25:1,7 26:13 | says (1) | +| 13:9 | prostitution (1... | 13:10 | | reporters (1) | 22:23 | +| pocket (1) | 8:13,14,24 9:2,5 | reasons (1) | | 15:2 | Scarola (44) | +| 16:11 | 9:8,11 11:2,10 | 13:19 | | Reporting (3) | 1:16 2:3,4 3:4 | +| position (1) | 11:13,16,19,23 | recall (2) | | 4:10,12 27:21 | 4:15,15 5:5 6:1 | +| 23:17 | 12:1,5,9,14,17 | 17:2 21:9 | | representative... | 6:15,19,23 7:2 | +| possibly (1) | 12:21 | received (2) | | 12:25 13:24 | 7:7,12,17,22 | +| 23:18 | public (3) | 7:13,18 | | requested (1) | 8:2,8,22 9:19 | +| prefer (1) | 7:24 8:4 26:13 | recess (3) | | 25:10 | 9:22 10:11,17 | +| 8:18 | punitive (1) | 14:5 22:2,13 | | residence (2) | 11:1,9 12:12 | +| preference (4) | 24:3 | recessing (1) | | 5:7,9 | 13:3,6,12,15 | +| 6:21,24 7:4,10 | purpose (1) | 22:19 | | residences (1) | 13:21 14:24 | +| prepared (1) | 15:20 | recognize (1) | | 5:11 | 16:4,20 18:8 | +| 21:4 | put (2) | 21:13 | | respect (3) | 18:13,24 19:2 | +| present (1) | 14:17 16:13 | recollection (5) | | 12:1,5 23:24 | 19:5,12 22:17 | + +| 22:21,24 23:5 | side (1) | 1:21 25:8 | things (1) | 26:6 | +|------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------| +| schedule (1) | 16:14 | sticker (1) | 10:8 | understandin... | +| 27:9 | sign (2) | 16:7 | think (2) | 6:16 | +| scheduled (1) | 27:15,17 | stop (1) | 15:20,22 | undertaking (1) | +| 23:21 | signature (3) | 9:12 | Third (2) | 8:4 | +| schedules (1) | 27:7,17,23 | Street (2) | 3:12 16:23 | | +| 10:23 | simply (2) | 2:15 5:17 | thirty (1) | | +| Scott (3) | 15:24 21:13 | stuff (1) | 27:15 | v (3) | +| 1:7 19:22,25 | sir (6) | 22:10 | thorough (1) | 3:12 27:4 28:3 | +| seal (1) | 5:21 12:11 17:5 | styled (1) | 10:12 | vacation (1) | +| 26:9 | 19:16,19 21:20 | 16:24 | time (16) | 5:13 | +| SEARCY (2) | solicited (15) | substantially (1) | 4:2 6:12,12 9:15 | various (1) | +| 1:16 2:4 | 8:23 9:1,4,7,10 | 24:7 | 10:22 11:20,23 | 13:18 | +| second (1) | 11:2,10,13,16 | sued (1) | 14:3,7,17 | version (1) | +| 9:13 | 11:19,22,25 | 17:2 | 18:10 21:25 | 27:10 | +| see (2) | 12:4,16,20 | Suite (2) | 22:4,18 24:9 | versus (2) | +| 10:21 23:3 | soliciting (3) | 2:12 27:21 | 27:6 | 4:4 16:24 | +| seeking (1) | 8:13 12:9,14 | supportive (2) | times (6) | victim (1) | +| 15:15 | someone's (1) | 24:2,4 | 8:23 9:1,4,7,10 | 23:9 | +| seen (1) | 16:10 | sure (4) | 21:17 | victims (1) | +| 16:25 | soon (1) | 10:17 17:8 | Today's (1) | 23:14 | +| served (6) | 16:6 | 18:12 21:12 | 4:1 | Video (1) | +| 20:9,13,17,20 | sorry (3) | sworn (2) | 15:11 | videographer ... | +| 20:25 21:5 | 18:17 19:15 | 5:2 26:8 | 15:22 | 4:1,10 5:21,23 | +| serves (1) | 21:12 | | totally (1) | 9:15,24 14:3,7 | +| 15:20 | sought (2) | | 15:22 | 16:10,13 21:25 | +| services (2) | 7:13,18 | T (1) | 25:9,10 27:7,10 | 22:4 24:9 | +| 4:11 7:23 | south (2) | 3:8 | transcript (8) | videotaped (2) | +| set (2) | 2:13 19:24 | take (6) | 27:12,12,13 | 1:10 4:3 | +| 15:19 16:1 | speaking (1) | 9:19 14:1 21:14 | 28:2 | Virgin (3) | +| sex-related (6) | 18:25 | 21:24 23:3 | 10:24 | 5:10 9:11 11:3 | +| 7:20,25 8:6 | specific (2) | 27:6 | traveled (1) | vs (1) | +| 12:23 13:22 | 17:15 23:6 | taken (5) | treatment (2) | 1:6 | +| 15:12 | Stand (1) | 10:22 14:5 22:2 | 7:14,19 | | +| sexual (12) | 9:24 | 23:21,22 | true (2) | | +| 6:2,11,20,24 7:4 | state (10) | Tammy (6) | 25:10 28:22 | W | +| 7:9,15 10:15 | 5:6 9:5,8 13:23 | 1:21 4:9 25:6,19 | truly (1) | waive (3) | +| 10:19 21:10,17 | 17:24 18:15 | 26:13 27:20 | 27:19 | 27:7,17,23 | +| 22:10 | 21:8 25:3 26:3 | terminating (1) | try (1) | want (7) | +| Sheet (2) | 26:13 | 22:17 | 21:2 | 6:8 14:17 17:16 | +| 27:13 28:1 | stated (1) | testified (1) | trying (1) | 18:10 23:12,14 | +| SHIPLEY (2) | 28:21 | 5:3 | 21:15 | 23:20 | +| 1:16 2:4 | stay (1) | Thank (4) | two (2) | waste (1) | +| show (1) | 14:20 | 9:23 16:19 23:4 | 8:13 20:7 | 6:12 | +| 20:3 | stenographic (... | 24:8 | | way (2) | +| shut (1) | 25:11 | Thanks (1) | | 5:20 16:15 | +| 16:18 | stenographica... | 5:24 | | we'll (2) | +| | | | undersigned (1) | 6:17 9:22 | + +| WEISS (1)
2:12 | 1:13 24:9,12
10065 (1)
2:15 | 33401 (2)
2:13 27:22
33409 (2)
1:17 2:5
358 (1)
5:19 | 9:50 (1)
14:7
9:58 (2)
21:25 22:3 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| West (5)
1:17 2:5,13 4:7
27:22
(2)
2:9 27:2 | 1395 (2)
2:10 27:2
1400 (1)
2:12
14th (2)
2:10 27:2
15TH (1)
1:1
16 (1)
3:12
1615 (1)
27:21 | | | +| wish (2)
27:12,17 | | | | +| withdrawing (1)
15:6 | | | | +| witness (11)
5:2,22 8:20 10:6
12:11 13:18
18:7,12 19:3
23:20 26:9 | | | | +| witness's (1)
19:8 | | | | +| wondering (1)
9:25 | | | | +| words (1)
20:4 | 2 | 6100 (1)
5:9 | | +| WRITE (1)
28:2 | 2012 (7)
1:12 4:2 25:17
26:10 27:1,6
28:5 | 66th (1)
2:15 | | +| X | | 7 | | +| X (2)
3:1,8 | 2139 (3)
1:16 2:5 4:6
22 (1)
5:18 | 71st (1)
5:17 | | +| Y | 234 (1)
20:8
234-count (1)
19:21 | 888)811-3408 ...
27:8 | | +| York (5)
2:15,15 5:14,17
11:11 | 25 (5)
1:12 4:2 27:1,6
28:5
250 (1)
2:13
25th (2)
25:17 26:9 | 9 (1)
5:17
9:00 (1)
27:9
9:30 (1)
14:3
9:34 (2)
1:13 4:3
9:39 (1)
9:15
9:40 (1)
14:4
9:43 (1)
14:6 | | +| Z | 3 | | | +| Zorro (1)
5:18 | 30 (1)
27:15
301 (1)
2:15
33131 (2)
2:10 27:3 | | | +| 0 | | | | +| 1 | | | | +| 1 (4)
3:12 16:5,8,22
10/23/2015 (1)
26:14
10:00 (1)
22:4
10:03 (3) | | | | + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +DEFENDANT ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ +TO PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. ██████, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that General Interrogatories numbered 1 through 16 have been directed to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, this 16th day of September, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 16th day of September, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for ██████ J. ██████ + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, J. INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAN , EPSTEIN + +(If answering for another person or entity, answer with respect to that sgn or entity, unless otherwise stated.) + +- 1. What is the full name and Florida address of the, answering these interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official p on or relationship with the party to whom the interrogatories are directed?\_ +- 2. What is your best estimatez the number of minor females' with whom you have had physical contact hitt last 10 years, when at the time of the physical contact: + - a. i e)4( St e genitals or breasts of the minor female were exposed the minor female was clothed only in underwear tals were exposed + +• &quot; minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have reason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +- 3. What is your best estimate of the number of times in the last 10 years when you have had physical contact with minor females when at the time of the physical contact: + - a. your genitals were exposed + - b. the genitals or breasts of the minor female were + - c. the minor female was clothed only in tmderw 4 S) +- 4. What is your best estimate number of times you have witnessed Ghislaine Maxwell engage in sexu twit with minor females? +- 5. Mattis the total obligation that has been incurred to date for both fees and costs , -(both paid and currently owing) in connection with your representation in this lawsuit? + +• &quot;sexual activity" for purposes of these interrogatories means any physical contact with the genitals or exposed breasts of another person. + +- 6. With regard to the last time you engaged in sexual activity with a minor, state the following: + - a. the identity of the minor (name and last known address) + - b. the date 444" + - c. the location l O + - d. a description of the sexual activity /S ) +- 7. Describe in detail all information, written or oral, which William Scherer or any attorney or agent of the law firm of Conrad Scherer has provided to you or your attorne s h a any allegation which has been asserted in this case against \_Describe in your own words all interaction you have had with the individual identified in this action as L.M., including but not limited to the dates, places, participants in, witnesses to, and a description of all sexual activity involving L.M. + +- 9. What is the name and last known address of eery healthcare provider with whom you have treated or been evaluated for any sexual disorder? 444/ +- 10. List all former names and when you were known ht- Onse ames. State all addresses where you have lived for the past 10 years', the dates you lived at each address, your Social Security number, and your dote °third]. +- 11. Have you ever been convicted ( \fva crime, other than any juvenile adjudication, which under the law under which you were convicted was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year, or that involved dishonesty or a false statement regardless of th punishment? ii..., + +If so each conviction: + +- (a;IS The specific crime; +- (b) The date and place of conviction. + +AkS + +- 12. List the names and addresses of all persons who are believed or known by you, your agents or attorneys to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit; and specify the subject matter about which the witness has knowledge. + +O -SA + +- 13. Have you heard or do you know about any statement or remark made by or on behalf of any party to this lawsuit, other th yo elf, concerning any issue in this lawsuit? + +If so: + +IS ) + +- (a) State the name an&adcicss of each person who made the statement or statements. +- (b) State the name and address of each person who heard it. N (e)" State the date, time, place and substance of each statement. + +- 14. State the name and address of every person known to you, your agents, or attorneys, who has knowledge about, or possession, custody or control of any physical evidence, model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, video tape, or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy; and describe as to each, what such person has, the name and address of the person who took or prepared it, and the date it was taken or prepared. +- 15. Have you made an a'ettme with anyone that would limit that party's liability to anyone for any the \*naps sued upon in this case? If so, state the terms of the agreement and tje parp to it. + +- 16. Please state if you have ever been a party, either plaintiff or defendant, in a lawsuit other than the present matter and if so, state whether you were plaintiff or defendant, the nature of the action, the date and court in which such suit was filed, the nature of the disposition of each matter, and (if the matter has been settled) describe all terms and conditions of the settlement including the nature and amount of all consideration paid by you or on your behalf in contistaion with each settlement. + +J O + +STATE OF + +'C)C + +COUNTY OF ) + +The foregoing instrument o Tedged before me this day of , 20 , by , who is personally known to me or who has produced 0 as identification and who did did/ not take an oath. + +AS ' Illir + +(SEALi X'...) + +(Notary signature) + +(Notary name - print) + +NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +(Serial number, if any) + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, an y + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +EctS + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFRE.thEPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, GENERAL INTERROGATORIES DA + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Rules • • Procedure, files his objections to the General Interrogatories of Defendant/C ter aintiff, J. and would state as follows: + +1. With regard to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objectsibtse the interrogatories seek irrelevant information, are burdensome, are propounc;\ purpose of harassment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Am m t of the United States Constitution. + +2. With regard to Interrogatories 10, II, and 16, the interrogatories seek information that is irrelevant, burdensome to produce, and unlikely to lead to discoverable information. + +3. With regard to Interrogatory No. 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trus. and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via O Email, O Facsimile, VU.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this /p 4I'day of October, 2010 to: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +C C) + +/S)C + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 709s.. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 '..) ( S" + +crman, Jr. + +54 BURNETT P.A. 901 oint est 777 Sou lagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ Counter-defendant + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +L.M., individually, CO individually, and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, 400 J. + +# NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATOR' VOUNTERDEFENDANT + +Counterplaintiff, J. M, here Ztice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net In gatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, TEIN, this ti day December, 2012. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attach list, ber, 2012. + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +418181\" + +Defendant(s). + +7 + +O Jack9 Flo ar No.: 169440 E-mail: jsx@searcylaw.com •ndary E-mail(s): mep©searcylaw.com Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for J. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +bje.efile@pathtojustice.com; +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com +The L-S Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305)-503-5503 +Fax: (305)-503-6801 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +# NET WORTH NTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +- 1. What is your full name? + +- 2. How are you currently employed? + +- 3. State the amount of your curre past 3 years and describe all additional bene past 3y ears including bonuses, allo options, deferred compensation, i including the dollar amount or dolC ) is each. come from all sources for each of the ed by you or payable to you for each of the on and profit sharing participations, and other prerequisites of your employment + +- 4. other securiti corporatio or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or class in any government, governmental organization company, firm or er foreign or domestic, please state: + +A Cos + +- (a) The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +- (b) The date and cost of acquisition; + +- (c) The current fair market value of each such inte + +- (d) The manner in which suc i g calculated. + +5. As to each • come tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all repo e and the separate amounts derived from each source + +- 6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest, state: + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +- (a) The address, + +- (b) The legal description of the property; + +- (c) The assessed value of the property f + +( < 4 + +- (d) The date and p f uisition; + +(e)\_ Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; + +- (f) Whether, when, and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; + +- (g) The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; +- (h) +- (i) The nature of your in +- (j) The c urrerCL fair arket value of the property and a description of the manner in which that value was c The cost of any improvements made to the propertMce purchase; 1 / 1)1A4441) 4PertY• + +ICZI4°V 7. List item and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible pro' w h you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of 1 or which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, d ch state: + +- (a) The date of acquisition; + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +- (b) The cost of acquisition; +- (c) The current estimated fair market value; CO SA \ CIC9 +- (d) The manner in which theS ( , value was estimated. + +8. If any of the or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered b a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each pmo roperty, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written documeO i a description of that document. + +- 9. If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800)COCXMBAG + +- (a) The name and address of the business; +- (b) A The present book value and the present market value of y of terest , in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the b • +- (c) A description of the manner in stated fair market value was calculated. + +10. Identify all banks, Credit onand savings and loan accounts, in which you have an interest or right of withdrawal r each account state: + +N + +- =0 Where the account is located; + - (b) The highest and lowest balance in the account during the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories. + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +- 11. Identify all other assets of a value in excess of \$10,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each state: Z - , S + - (a) The date of acquisition; + - (b) + - (c) The cost of acquisition;?S., The c ,r estimated fair market value; 0 + - (d) The means utilized to estimate the current fair market value. + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800)COCX/v1BAG + +- 12. Identify all other liabilities of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and as to each state: + - (a) The date the liability arose; + - (b) The amount of the liability at in + - (c) The terms of repayment or satisfaction; ?S" The current outstanding balance. Co s + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +- 13. As to any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + - (a) the date of the calculation or estimate; + - (b) the name and address of the person or entity respo performing the work + - (c) the reason for performing the calculation lat (d) the amount of net worth calcu \tmated r +- 14. What is your present net w ;c aw, ( S \ +- 15. As to all transfers g of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, + - (a) ?cascription of the transferred property; 0 \$0). the reason for the transfer; + - (c) the value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; + - (d) the date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAO + +- (e) whether you received anything of value in exchange for the transferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and the dollar value of what you received; +- (f) the name and address of the recipient of each transferred ite m A + +CO S + +/S C2 + +STATE OF COUNTY OF ) + +The foregoing instrument wledged before me this day of 20 , by , who is personally known to me or who has produced Il likr as identification and who did did/ not take an oath. (S e + +(Notary signature) + +(Notary name - print) NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +(Serial number, if any) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +SCOT individually, J. and individually. + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendants. + +JUDGE: + +Eta PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMEND I NSES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFF IN + +PlaintiffCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("E undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of hereby files his amended responses to Defend Worth Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein: y and through his Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff Edward's Net + +- 1. What is your full name? + +ANSWER: Jeffrey Edward \* + +- 2. How are you currently employed? + +ANSWER: Self-em Ililled and Philanthropist. + +t 3. Stat6 tl mtount of your current annual income from all sources for each of the past 3 d ascribe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for eac ast 3 years including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit sharing ions, options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits and other pre unites of your employment including dollar amount or dollar value of each. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951).1 cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +4. If you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + +- a. The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; +- b. The date and cost of acquisition; +- c. The current fair market value of each such interest; +- d. The manner in which such value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher 17. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I'cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history, and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +5. As to each income tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all repo edsane 'w and the separate amounts derived from each source. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which conumbocates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). ve a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact thW testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6., For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest: state: + +- a. The address; +- b. The legal description of the property; +- c. The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; +- d. The date and price of acquisition; + +- e. Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; +- 1. Whether, when and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; +- g. The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; +- h. The cost of any improvements made to the property since purchase; +- i. The nature of your interest in the property; +- j. The current fair market value of the property and adescription of the manner in which that value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher.v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have asubstantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a"link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486'(195,1). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial ry and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment teed by the United States Constitution. + +- 7. List each item and state, th /estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property in which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$10,000 or which personal property has an estimated present value in cxccss of \$10,000, and e.g.'s.) each state: + - a. Th edat racquisition; cost of acquisition; ecurrent estimated fair market value; The manner in which the fair market value was estimated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have asubstantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a"link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, + +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. If any of the real or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered by a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each property, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document and, if so, a description of that document. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition out waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by U tates Constitution. + +- 9. If you have an ownership interest in any busiue%ges, each business state: + - a. The name and address of the b + - b. The present book value and tlte,t ent market value of your interest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the business; + - c. A description of the manner in which the fair market value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +- 10. Identify all banks, credit union and savings and loan accounts, in which you have an interest or right of withdrawal and for each account state: + - a. Where the account is located; + - b. The highest and lowest balance in the account during the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +11. Identify all other assets of a value in access of \$10,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. The date of acquisition; +- b. The cost of acquisition; +- c. The current estimated fair market value; +- d. The means utilized to estimate the curre Go et value. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires t11tf\*vision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. Identify all other liabilities of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. 4 1e date the liability arise; amount of the liability at inception; 14/ r)The terms of repayment or satisfaction; + - d. The current outstanding balance. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +13. As to any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + +- a. The date of the calculation or estimate; +- b. The name and address of the person or entity responsible for performing the work; +- c. The reason for performing the calculation or estimate; +- d. The amount of net worth calculated or estimated. l' ---) + +( \_— Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me;in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). 1 cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +14. What is your present net worth? + +Answer: I have already indicate" my willingness to stipulate to a net worth in excess of one hundred million dollars. / + +15. As to all transfers of anything of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, state: + +- a. ? c S description , of the transferred property; e reason for the transfer; AA, c. The value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; + - d. The date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); + - e. Whether you received anything of value in exchange for the transferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and the dollar value of what you received; + - f. The name and address of the recipient of each transferred item. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have asubstantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a"link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +[THIS PORTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J, Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPS ICE OF SERVING VERIFICATION PAGE TO DEFENDANT/CO N -PLAINTIFF NET WORTH INTERR ORIES + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his u Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Proced Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff counsel and pursuant to files this verification page to Worth Interrogatories. + +WE HEREBY CERTIF at e and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon Defendant, and upottall pptes listed on the attached service list, via electronic service, this Febru 2013. + +Isl Tonia Haddad Coleman + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja®tonjahaddad.com + +![]()State of New York ) +County of New York ) + +Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Jeffrey Epstein, who is personally known to me, and who first being duly sworn, says that he has █ and the foregoing, and that all of the matters contained therein are true and correct. + +![]()HARRY I. BELLER +Notary Public, State of New York +No. 018E485:S24 +Qualified in Rockland County +Commission Expires Feb. 17, 2014 + +Sworn and Subscribed before me this 22nd day of February, 2013. + +COMES NOW the Counter-Plaintiff, undersigned counsel and propounds the fol 1.370 Florida Rules of Civil Proced admit the truth of the facts set fo M, by and through his quest for Admissions pursuant to Rule ing that Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually Defendant(s). + +### REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO .TE V EPSTEIN + +- 1. Admit that you have licly been described as a billionaire. +- 2. Admit at pr s reports have described you as a billionaire. +- 3. fydn4j t you have never publicly disputed the description of you as a 4 . Admit that you have never publicly disputed any press reports describing you as a billionaire. +- 5. Admit that you are a billionaire. +- 6. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 5 years. +- 7. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 10 years. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Request for Admissions to Jeffrey Epstein + +- 8. Admit that you have a reputation as being a billionaire. +- 9. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a billion dollars at times during the past 5 years. +- 10. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded half a billion f3gjlars times during the past 5 years. +- 11. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a q er o a illion dollars at times during the past 5 years. +- 12. Admit that you have never paid even on punitive damages to any person who has alleged that you en proper sexual conduct with them ? S while that person was a minor. \' ., +- 13. Admit that you have neve t ev n one day in a state or federal prison facility (as opposed to a co punishment for any sex-related crime. + +Pursuant to &Iles of Civil Procedure, each fact on which admission is requested shall be deemed not denied or if no reply is received on or before March 28, 2013. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request for Admissions to Jeffrey Epstein + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this Wem day of February, 2013. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Primary E-mail: jsx@searcylaw.com +Secondary E-mail(s): mep@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOO:MBAG Request for Admissions to 'effigy Epstein + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +is la Esquire staff efile®pathtojustice.com , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, FL 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee®FredHaddadLaw.com; haddadfm®aol.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite Fort Lauderdale, FL 394 Phone: (954)467 Fax: (954)-467 Attorneys f J pstein Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marr,®nurildaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-355 Attorneys for Sco m + +Lilly Ann lsanche The Esq scorn Avenue, 15th Floor 33131 305)-503-5503 (305)-503-6801 meys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja®tonjahaddad.com; Debbie®Tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +SC CLUalLi§T •T ually, CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXX M BAG + +and J. individually. JUDGE: + +Defendants. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure hereby files his responses to Defendant/Counter- MEI Edward's Requests for Admissions to Jeffrey Epstein as follows: + +- I. Admitted. +- 2. Admitted. +- 3. Objection. This Re estS f \*1 dmission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that arc testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prossqutepie in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951).1 cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +4. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that arc testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United Slates, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Am rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +5. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response -which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these st tements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in h of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceeding e ffinan v. United Stales, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answer&esp s to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United Stales, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history + +and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +7. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that arc testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be\_ kised to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan is United States, 341 US. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my finhncial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. Objection. This Request for Admission requ ponse which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States,, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that theSe statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link, in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal preceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without Waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +9. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that arc testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 + +(1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +10. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that-could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See floffinan v. United Stares, 34I-U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Amendment rights as + +11. Objection. This Request for Admi statements of fact. Fisher v. United S and reasonable basis for cone nature could reasonably furnish a Tres a response which communicates U.S. 391, 410 (1976). 1 have a substantial ese statements of fact that are testimonial in ink in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. Objection. This Request for Admission requires a response which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that arc testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to + +for the charges to which I plead. 13. I admit that I was sentenccd by a State Court Judge to the Palm Beach County Jail A + +prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Henan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial information without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +K WE HEREBY CERTIFY that atrue and correct copy of the & . grq... viyl casserved upon Jack Scarola, Esq., and 27, 2013. J. Esq., via Electroatb- e, this March + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +wOFFICES OF Town HADDAD, PA + +315 SE 7" Street + +ite 301 + +ort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +954.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb9dc90e8972be57b6a28a594b62a8432f2d5071 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/EFTA02762686.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,4074 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 95, + "chars": 259604, + "elapsed_seconds": 193.17, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg", + "_page_46_Picture_36.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 114.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 165.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 405.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 406.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF OATH STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 217.26, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 217.26, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 342.72, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 215.0511932373047, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 215.0511932373047, + 70.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 70.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 ERRATA SIIEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.439998626708984, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 185.54754638671875, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 185.54754638671875, + 406.36944580078125 + ], + [ + 50.439998626708984, + 406.36944580078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 179.5970458984375, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 179.5970458984375, + 67.74945068359375 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 67.74945068359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ON BE l .NDANT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 134.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 134.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX \n...", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 219.7578125, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 219.7578125, + 436.1868896484375 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 436.1868896484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCAROLA:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 359.856, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 428.4, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 428.4, + 461.86944580078125 + ], + [ + 359.856, + 461.86944580078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "..XH.1 -I \nSE TS 11", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.0600128173828, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 344.0794372558594, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 344.0794372558594, + 528.9994506835938 + ], + [ + 158.0600128173828, + 528.9994506835938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF OATH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 69.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 TO PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 377.46000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 148.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, J. \nINTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAN , EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 543.7822265625, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 543.7822265625, + 191.60302734375 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 191.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15Th \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 531.3903198242188, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 531.3903198242188, + 145.10302734375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 145.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFRE.thEPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, \nGENERAL INTERROGATORIES DA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 521.4205322265625, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 521.4205322265625, + 395.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 395.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 179.01 + ], + [ + 387.020263671875, + 179.01 + ], + [ + 387.020263671875, + 193.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 193.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.575, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 513.6409301757812, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 513.6409301757812, + 116.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 288.575, + 116.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATOR' VOUNTERDEFENDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.995, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 500.3278503417969, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 500.3278503417969, + 351.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 71.995, + 351.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.59500000000003, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 330.82, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 330.82, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 238.59500000000003, + 141.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NET WORTH NTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.975, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 448.99749755859375, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 448.99749755859375, + 157.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 121.975, + 157.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPS ICE OF \nSERVING VERIFICATION PAGE TO DEFENDANT/CO N -PLAINTIFF \nNET WORTH INTERR ORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 257.58 + ], + [ + 517.1596069335938, + 257.58 + ], + [ + 517.1596069335938, + 301.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 301.1030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.575, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 514.2784118652344, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 514.2784118652344, + 128.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 288.575, + 128.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO .TE \nV EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.66000000000003, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 437.3477478027344, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 437.3477478027344, + 350.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 135.66000000000003, + 350.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.15500000000003, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 361.7612609863281, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 361.7612609863281, + 147.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 267.15500000000003, + 147.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 503.676, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 503.676, + 275.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 275.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 171 + ], + [ + "Text", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Text", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 383 + ], + [ + "Line", + 187 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Text", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 148 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Text", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 150 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 269 + ], + [ + "Line", + 133 + ], + [ + "Text", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Text", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 164 + ], + [ + "Text", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 269 + ], + [ + "Line", + 125 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 151 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 212 + ], + [ + "Line", + 99 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 415 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 161 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762686" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f821260f4f47230b33da1a7be27749b6226d289b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b888b3a0e3d7c668b43fb642443e5dd1502796ae9ca2575e0aa5c1a7a6c29e1c +size 3812 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_46_Picture_36.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_46_Picture_36.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6402e17df207b5924ed8a5eeba474006116ea2a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762686/_page_46_Picture_36.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6640befb00b92d3b19d9f36191a178a67af6a581235dda0550ef0df1bf71f87f +size 3484 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..438bcf559f081191504f98c5ae8a664d2ded2f67 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.md @@ -0,0 +1,480 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +#### NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRI RESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLI PRIVIL AND DISCOVERY HE ATTORNEY-CLIENT + +Go + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. y rough undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Filing Deposition Transc • xce ts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client P d as grounds therefor states as follows: + +# s5t , n a + +At the November 17 pre-trial hearing, the Court requested that Counter-Plaintiff J. Edw ifically identify the discovery responses provided by Jeffrey Epstein implicatin t mey-Client privilege. This Notice of Filing outlines the specific questions and answers p n's March 17, 2010 deposition testimony in which Epstein raised the privilege, as well as citations to Epstein's Answers to Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010 and Amended Answers to Interrogatories dated August 20, 2013, which proffers for introduction at trial and relies upon to preclude Epstein from offering testimony concerning matters as to which discovery was precluded through privilege assertions. + +# I. MARCH 17, 2010 DEPOSITION + +### a. Page 48. Line 9 through Page 49. Line 11; + +Q. Amon allegations of wrongdoing against Mr. which you contend form the basis of this Ai lp•Atc lawsuit is something having to do with sending an Would you tell me lease more specifically o what it is that Mr. did with regard to sending investigator to California. an investigator to California which. you contend justifies a legal claim against Mr. . + +n + +"S C) + +MR. PIKE: Form. And also mischaracterizes the witness' testimony. + +THE WITNESS: Reported widely in the newspapers is the use of illegal activities, wja% taps and methods by the Rothstein firm Mr. =MI had basically been brig cases. + +The investigator, Mr. Fisten, w t ed in the Complaint, represented sel an FBI agent, falsely represented himse FBI agent. + +BY MR. SCAROL + +Q. Do you have ao rsoni>1 knowledge of anything that Mr. Fistensiill a Mr. Fisten was in California? + +MR. PI that q my firm's conversations with you, you can answer the question. xtent that you can answer thout disclosing my conversation or versation or any of your attorneys' + +THE WITNESS: Pm sorry. Based on attorney/client privilege, I can't answer. + +#### b. Page 51. Lines 5-13 + +Do have any personal knowledge that was ever involved in obstructions of justice? + +MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer that question without disclosing any attorney/client communications with any of your attorneys, you can answer that question. + +THE WITNESS: It's attorney/client privilege, I'm afraid. + +# c. Page 52. lines 19-22 + +Ilion have any personal knowledge ever forged Federal Opinions? ers and/or + +C) A. It's attorney/client privilege. + +# d. Page 52.1' 23-291hrough page 53. lines 1-4 + +.Doyou h rsonal knowledge that as ever involved in the marketing of non-e settlements? + +MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +THE WITNESS: Pm sorry. I would like to answer that question, but on attorney/client privilege I cannot today. + +esA Co + +### e. Page 53, lines 6-24 + +Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics. Other than those matters previously referred to in earkkestions, is it your contention that had any personal involvement in any other, quote, abusive investigatory tactics? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the newspapers that Mr. firm was engaged in widely — wildly abusive practices throughout the State of Florida in order to fleece unsuspecting investors out of millions of dollars. + +The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleges his ft engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. + +Mr. Scherer's Complaint alleges monstrq amounts of fraud and discovery abuse I have no personal knowledge, sep the attorney/client in regarding Mr. + +# f. Pa e 54 r 1-10 + +1. Do h EdV unsup rsonal knowledge that er filed legal papers that were + +MR. PIKE: 'I'm going to object to form. And to the extent you can answer that question without disclosing any attorney/client communications with any of your attorneys, I'm going to allow you to answer that question. + +THE WITNESS: Pm afraid it's attorney/client privilege. + +s A Co g. Page 63. Line 23 through Page 64, Line 3; + +Q. So it is your contention that Mr. was part of a criminal enterprise? + +A. Yes, it is. + +Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege. + +CO eSA + +et h. Page 66. Line 8-25 through Page 67. lines I C age 67. Line 11. + +Have you ever personally witnessed Bradles , engaged in money laundering? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Again, sir, the Complaint of the Rothstein f launderhst wire fraud, mail fra Mr. partners an firm the largest criminal e Florida's history, used o cases, sir, of a to fleece uns millions o Ws money CO claims of firm, calling the se in South abricating malicious harged nature in order outh Floridians out of + +BY MR. OLA: + +Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, whetharit have any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever personally participated in any of that wrongdoing? + +MR. PIKE: To that question, to the extent you can answer it without violating attorney/client and work product, you can answer the question. + +THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it will be attorney/client privilege, sir. + +# i. Page 67. lines 6-12 + +Q. Do you have any evidence -- knowledge of any evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever participated in any effort to market any kind of investment in anything? + +A. I would have to claim attorney/client privilege on that, sir. + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +# j. Page 67. Line 22 through P + +Q. Yes, sir. I want to know whe knowledge of evidence that B ever participated in devising a sold purported confidenti payout settlement? ve any ards personally ough which were ments of a structured + +MR. PIKE: Fo + +THE like to answer that question by say e newspapers have reported that his firm engaged in fraudulent structured settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. + +With respect to my personal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward to at some point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client privilege. + +A Cos + +### k. Page 71. Lines 19-22 + +Q. Is it your contention that was ever personally involved in manufacturing false and/or fraudulent Court Opinions or Orders? + +A. Attorney/client privilege. + +# 1. Page 76, Line 24 through Page 77, Line 17; + +Sou have any information indicating that ever had any knowledge of anyon associated with the Rothstein firm holding meet during which, quote, "false statements were m the number of cases/clients that existed or against Epstein and the value thereof," u ci ote. tie + +MR. PIKE: Form. Same objection. + +THE WITNESS: My best reco Attorney has accused the Roths those types of meetings together, schemed to defra millions of doll fabri sexually char personally today, sir, privile it. the U.S. ?m of just the partners got cal investors of ting cases of a And whether Mr. , I'm going to at least sect the attorney/client ok forward to one day disclosing + +MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike all unresponsive portions of the answer. + +# m. Page 77. Line 23 through Page 78. lines 24 Page 79, Line 22; + +Q. Do you have any knowledge that + +A Cos + +fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: I believe Mr. Scherer's Complaint — + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. I'm asking about any evidence that you have. + +MR. PIKE: The witness is basically been five words into his sentence and you're not allowing him to finish, once again. + +So if you recall the question, then please respond. + +THE WITNESS: Please repeat it back, plea ktoS. \' , + +MR. PIKE: Madame Court Reporter, would. + +(Pending question was read.) + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: gs of Mr. Scherer and his claim agai tein firm for a massive fraud, as wel S owitz's claims to -- at least in th d in the public press, beca t to the FBI, for fabricating cases that inclu initials. + +With re anything specific with Mr. , I'm going to have to claim the attorney/client privilege today, sir. + +n. Page 79. lines 1-7 + +Q. Do you have any -- do you have knowledge of + +E OSA + +the existence of any evidence that knew that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi scheme? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: That's attorney/client privilege. + +o. Raze 79, lines 9-22 + +Q. Do you have knowled e of any evidence that would indicate should have know Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Po i' ' scheme? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least today -- + +MR. PIKE: Wait. + +THE WITNESS: Sorry. + +MR. PIKE: Form me objbetions. Same attorney/clien rk duct as to the last question. Sa Cons here, attorney/client work prodil + +THE WI'I SS: And today I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client privilege. + +p. Page 83. Line 24 through page 84, line 15 + +Q. As you sit here today, do you have any evidence whatsoever to support an assertion that individually and personally, sold, allowed to esA Co + +be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? + +MR. PIKE: Before you answer that question, Madame Court Reporter, will you please read that question back to me? + +(Pending question was read.) + +MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question without divulging attorney/client or work product information, you may answer that question. + +MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. + +THE WITNESS: You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege tooic the answer, I'm afraid, but I'd like to answer question. + +q. Page 84. line 17 throw a <)\*' . line 9 + +4s) + +Q. Do you have lmowled any evidence indicating that Bradl Ed ar ever reached agreements to share attorney'wit on-lawyers? + +MR. PIKE: I' tell me w to, if y r. Scarola, can you the Complaint you're referring + +MR. SCA OLA: I'm not referring to any page of the Complaint, although I will tell you that that precise allegation is made in the Complaint. + +THE WITNESS: In fact Mr. Scarola, we have subpoenaed Mr. documents and documents from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me more specificity with the answers to that question. I'm looking forward to getting the -- that + +specific evidence. With respect to what we currently know, sitting here today, I'm unfortunately going to have to claim my attorney/client privilege. + +r. Page 85. line 11 through Page 86. Line 4; + +Q. Do you today have ',knee to support an assertion that ever used investor money to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front money, such that they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +THE WITNESS: You'll have to get -- I need hear the first part of the question. Do I have evidence? Do I have knowledge of evide s aw. rri sorry. What was the - + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Do you have knowledge of y ev. nee to support that assertion? + +MR. PIKE: To the e tent ir ftean r answer that question without ating orney/client, work product, please + +MR. SCAIFQT9bjection. Coaching. + +THE WI SS: Pm going to have to assert the attorney/client privilege, I'm afraid, though I'd like to answer that question as well, sir. + +s. Page 87, Lines 1-18 + +',on have knowledge of any evidence that ever conducted searches, wire taps or esA Co + +A. I'm going to have to -- + +MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +THE WITNESS: -- assert the a C e) privilege to that, sir. + +- t. Page 87.1' th t gh Page 88. Line 14 + +Q. Do you h ever parti utili limited to, owledge that or was aware of actions that 'mai process, including, but not easonable and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +intercepted conversations in violation of State or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +THE WITNESS: The newspapers and the U.S. Attonloomplaint widely reported that Mr. firm and people hired by his firm, investigators hired by his firm fraudulently representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in just those activities, sir. + +COSA + +Mr have any lrnowledge ofoanf y evidehnceotth a iS 4)9 vk \ + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +( c\ + +MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +To the extent you can answer the question without disclosing attorney/client or work product information, do so. + +THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South Florida's history engaged in by Mr. firm and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, not only illegal wire taps and eavesdropping, but an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe speaks for itself. + +Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. today, I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client, work privilege, sir. COSA + +### u. Page 114. Line 1-7 + +Q. What day are you prepared to answer all these "S C) questions? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Attorney/client and work/ product. + +THE WITNESS: That's attorney - could answer that question as w C , b attorney/client privilege, sir. + +# v. Page 122 9 t ugh Page 123. Line 9. + +Q. How are the value g o go about finding out what is? + +MR. PI ttorney/client, work product. To the extent you can answer without disclosing our conversations or the conversations with your other attorneys that you've delineated, you can do so. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Or you can just take the signal and say, I refuse to answer because it's attorney/client privilege. A. I resent that. + +MR. PIKE: Move to strike. + +THE WITNESS: But it's okay. You can continue to try to harass me, sir. It doesn't work. The ladies and gentlemen of the jury, hopefully when they see the deposition will recognize and see these pile of tricks. The answer -- + +MR. SCAROLA: Hopefully they will. + +THE WITNESS: Yes. + +MR. PIKE: Move to strike. + +THE WITNESS: I will respectfully decline to answer that. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. On what basis? + +A. Attorney/client privilege. + +MR. PIKE: And worc prt icu + +w. Pa es I throu 21. + +THE I SS: Asp rtmte to the amount of damages, I think Mr. played a vital role. I believe his partners potentially plaeci.t role. I've only had any contact with Mr. , sir. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. Which partners? + +A. Beg your pardon? + +Q. Which partners, besides Mr. and Mr. Rothstein, do you claim engaged in conduct that renders them liable to you? + +A. I believe it's in the Complaint, sir. And I believe it's Mr. Adler, Mr. Berger. There's Mr. Jenne, Mr. Fisten, but those are not partners. So Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler -- and I forgot the names of the others at the moment, sir, but it's in the Complaint. + +Q. Why didn't you sue them? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege, sirs , + +MR. PIKE: Work product. + +CO 4S-A + +# IL EP GENERAL INTERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBE 010 + +- 7. Descebe inn l all information, written or oral, which William Scherer or any r agent of the law firm of Conrad Scherer has provided to you or your eys which relates to any allegation which has been asserted in this case against J. + +ANSWER: With regard to Interrogatory number 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +### III. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES DATED AUGUST 20, 2013 + +A. With regard to all communications that occurred at any time prior to the g of your civil lawsuit a inst in which communication y ressed the position that was a knowing participant in ffo of Scott Rothstein to defraud investors (the Scott Rothstein Ponzi sc or that engaged in any misconduct relating to the Scott onzi scheme, state the following: + +- 1. a detailed description of the contents of the co anon; +- 2. all participants in and parties to the co +- 3. the date, time, place and circumstan of e communication including how the communication was made; +- 4. whether, when, how and why th f the communication were ever subsequently related to any other pe +- 5. whether and how the ts %f the communication were ever memorialized in any manner anft, e identity of everyone having custody of such memorialization. + +ANSWER: No such non-privileg unication occurred. In other worst, I never had a conversation as elf above with anyone other than my counsel(s), which would re air isclosures of information that is protected by the attorney/client rival . United Services Auto. Ass'n. v. Roth, 859 So. 2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 46 D 03); Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd., 958 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. IqoparCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert the attorney/client privilege as provi ed f I § 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. + +B. d to any request, direction, or authorization to sue u Si ictted you at any time prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against ley state the following: + +- a detailed description of the contents of the communication; . all participants in and parties to the communication; . the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including how the communication was made; +- 4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever subsequently related to any other person; +- 5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memorialized in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such memorialization. + +**ANSWER:** No such non-privileged communication occurred. In other worst, I never had a conversation as delineated above with anyone other than my counsel(s), which would require the disclosures of information that is protected by the attorney/client privilege. *United Services Auto. Ass'n. v. Roth*, 859 So. 2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); *Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd.*, 958 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert the attorney/client privilege as provided for in § 90.502 of the *Florida Statutes*. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of December, 2017. + +*/s/ Jack Scarola* + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege +Page 18 of 19 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +█████ J. █████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the +Attorney-Client Privilege + +Page 19 of 19 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fabbfa11ddba3d80228cf1627bffb760d960a9c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781/EFTA02762781.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1167 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762781.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 20032, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 114.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRI \nRESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLI \nPRIVIL \nAND DISCOVERY \nHE ATTORNEY-CLIENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 530.2413940429688, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 530.2413940429688, + 376.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 376.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "s5t , n a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 471.39 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 486.863037109375 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 486.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. MARCH 17, 2010 DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 411.7320251464844, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 411.7320251464844, + 166.863037109375 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 166.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Page 48. Line 9 through Page 49. Line 11;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 315.3930358886719, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 315.3930358886719, + 194.60302734375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 194.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Page 51. Lines 5-13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 207.18299865722656, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 207.18299865722656, + 166.863037109375 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 166.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Page 52. lines 19-22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 372.6 + ], + [ + 208.79165649414062, + 372.6 + ], + [ + 208.79165649414062, + 387.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 387.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Page 52.1' 23-291hrough page 53. lines 1-4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 337.4536437988281, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 337.4536437988281, + 525.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 525.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Page 53, lines 6-24", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 202.96800231933594, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 202.96800231933594, + 166.9925537109375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 166.9925537109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f. Pa e 54 r 1-10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 202.91351318359375, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 202.91351318359375, + 525.8624877929688 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 525.8624877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i. Page 67. lines 6-12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 202.8732452392578, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 202.8732452392578, + 236.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 236.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "j. Page 67. Line 22 through P", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 428.9830627441406 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 428.9830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "k. Page 71. Lines 19-22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 212.9532928466797, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 212.9532928466797, + 180.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 180.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Page 76, Line 24 through Page 77, Line 17;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 321.39306640625, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 321.39306640625, + 318.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 318.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "m. Page 77. Line 23 through Page 78. lines 24 Page 79, Line 22;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 675.54 + ], + [ + 406.6562805175781, + 675.54 + ], + [ + 406.6562805175781, + 691.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 691.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "u. Page 114. Line 1-7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 202.41397094726562, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 202.41397094726562, + 332.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 332.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "v. Page 122 9 t ugh Page 123. Line 9.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 525.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 525.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IL EP GENERAL INTERROGATORIES \nDATED SEPTEMBE 010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 527.1417236328125, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 527.1417236328125, + 484.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 484.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES DATED \nAUGUST 20, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 521.0393676757812, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 521.0393676757812, + 181.10302734375 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 181.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 165.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762781" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d2720cb9f51dfeb90b31e65174023e93668f5bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.md @@ -0,0 +1,2368 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +### COUNTER-PLAINTIFF SUPPORT OF HIS NOTICE OF FILING DEP AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES BY JEF ATTORNEY-CL IX OF DOCUMENTS IN RANSCRIPT EXCERPTS TEIN IMPLICATING THE RIVILEGE + +Counter-Plaintiff, this Appendix of Documents in Su and Discovery Responses by J d through undersigned counsel, hereby files s Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts em Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege: + +A + +| No. | Date | Document | +|-----|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| I | March 17 20 | De sition Transcri t — Je E stein | +| 2 | Septemb 0, 2 | Defendant Interrogatories to Plaintiff | +| 3 | o 1 , 010 | Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, SeEpstein's Je Objections to | +| | | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. General | +| 4 | August 20, 20113 | Notice of Service of Interrogatory to Jeffrey Epstein | +| 5 | ovember 5, 2013 | Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein's Amended Responses to | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of December, 2017. A + +/e/ Int+ NrarnIn + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +CO ' + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsx aw.com and + +tmnccann@searcyla + +Primary E-Mail: @scarcylaw.com + +Searcy Denne arnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm a Boulevard + +West Pal c lorida 33409 + +Phone. 1) -6300 + +F • 383-9451 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Appendix of Documents in Support of His Notice of Filing Deposition +Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff J. Ism Appendix of Documents in Support of His Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege Page 4 of 4 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Go + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +-vs- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN +Wednesday, March 17, 2010 +10:17 a.m. - 1:27 p.m. + +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Reported By: +Sandra W. Townsend, FPR +Notary Public, State of Florida +West Palm Beach Office Job #1358 + +APPEARANCES: + +1 On behalf of the Plaintiff: + +2 MICHAEL PIKE, ESQUIRE +3 BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +4 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +5 Phone: 561.842.2820 + +6 On behalf of the Defendant [REDACTED]: +7 JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +8 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY +9 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +10 Phone: 561.686.6300 + +11 On behalf of the Defendant L.M.: +12 [REDACTED], ESQUIRE +13 [REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS, +14 & LEHRMAN, P.L. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +15 Phone: 954.524.2820 + +16 Also Present: +17 STEVEN JAFFE, ESQUIRE +18 [REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS, +19 & LEHRMAN, P.L. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +20 Phone: 954.524.2820 + +EXHIBITS + +| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION | PAGE | +|------------------|-------------|------| +| Exhibit number 1 | Eyeglasses | 133 | + +PROCEEDINGS + +1 Deposition taken before Sandra W. Townsend, Court +2 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of +3 Florida at Large, in the above cause. + +4 --- +5 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. +6 This is media number one in the videotaped +7 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein in the matter of +8 Jeffrey Epstein versus Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] +9 and L.M. + +10 Today is Wednesday, March 17, 2010 at +11 10:17 a.m. + +12 We are at the law offices of Burman, +13 Critton -- Banyan -- of Burman, Critton on Banyan +14 Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida. + +15 My name is Joe Kozak. I'm the videographer. +16 The court reporter is Sandra Townsend from Prose +17 Court Reporting Agency. + +18 Would Counsel please introduce yourselves and +19 then the court reporter will swear in the witness. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: My name is Jack Scarola. I am +21 Counsel on behalf of Brad [REDACTED] in his capacity, +22 both as Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff in this +23 action. Mr. [REDACTED] is present with me. +24 +25 + +1 MR. PIKE: Michael Pike, on behalf of the 1 answer that question. Attorney/client. 2 Plaintiff, Jeffrey E ein. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. Brad on behalf of the 3 Q. Well, didn't you just tell me that your lawyer 5 Also present, Steve Jaffe, on behalf of the 5 represent you anymore? 6 Defendant, L.M., as well. 6 MR. PIKE: That's exactly what he said, 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 8 the question. 9 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was examined 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 and testified as follows: 10 Q. Okay. So I want to know then —1 want to 11 THE WITNESS: Yes, I do. Thank you. 11 know what your lawyer told you about that. 12 MR. PIKE: Before we get started, Jack, I just 12 MR. PIKE: I'm going ton you not to 13 wanted to get on the record,1 just want to make 13 answer that question. Atto e lien. 14 sure that you received this letter that I sent to 14 MR. SCAROLA: t is ontention, 16 MR. SCAROLA: I did receive the letter. 16 made, Mr. Epste any attorney/client 17 MR. PIKE: Okay. And were still on for 17 privilege with t matter. 18 Mr. deposition, as we sit here today? 18 MR. P mention, definitely not 19 MR. SCAROLA: That's correct. 19 mine. 20 MR. PIKE: Okay. Thank you. 20 BY MR. SCA 21 DIRECT EXAMINATION 21 • 1i pstcin, who else has shared that 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 ". • you at any time over the course of the 23 Q. Please slate your full name and your current 23 I 24 residence address. 24 A Again, Mr. Scarola, I'd like to answer that 25 A. My name is Jeffrey Epstein. I'm currently 2 ion, as I'd like to answer each and ewer), one of + +4 Defendant, L.M. 4 advised you that if you answered questions he wouldn't 7 THEREUPON, 7 Mr. Scuola, and I'm instructing him not to answer 15 your office yesterday of March 16,2010. 15 obviously, that by c sta ent that he has + +1 raiding at 358 El Brillo in Palm Beach. 1 your questions here today. However, on advice of 2 Q. How long have you resided at that toe ti 2 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 3 Mr. Epstein? 3 14th Amendment Right. 4 A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel today, I'm 4 Q. Arc you a Plaintiff in a lawsuit against Scott S going to lake the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendmeot with 5 Rothstein, 1. and an individual 6 respect to that question, Mr. Scarola. 6 identified by the initials L.M.? 7 Q. Have you maintained any other residences over 7 A. Yes, sir, I am. 8 the course of the last five years? 8 Q. Who is the individual identified as L.M.? 9 A. Though I'd like to ansWe each and every one 9 A. I believe front depositions that I've read, her 10 of your questrons , respect to that 10 full name is LM. 11 question I'm goin veto assert my Constitutional 11. Q. When and under what circumstances did you 12 Rights as pro - ii I th, 14th and Sixth — 12 first meet the individual referenced by the initials 13 Fifth — sorry Ira, DA and 14th Amendment. 13 LM.? 14 Q. .p . i. ... idc with you at the El Brill° 14 A. Mr. Scarola, I think you are aware these 15 add 15 questions arc simply designed to have me invoke my Fifth 17 each and cry one of your questions here today, at 17 relation to other questions and other cases filed. 18 least with respect to that question, I'm going to have 18 But in response to your question, I'm going to 19 to assert my rights as under the Sixth, Fifth and 14th 19 have to invoke my right not to testify. 20 Amendment. 20 Q. Do you know the individual named L.M., 21 And I've been advised by Counsel, though I'd 21 identified by the initials L.M.? 22 like to answer these questions, if I do so, I risk 22 A. Mr. Scarola, at least today — I would like to 23 losing their representation. 23 answer that question; however, today, on advice of 24 Q. What did your lawyer tell you in that regard? 24 Counsel, I'm going to have to refuse to answer that 25 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 25 question. + +16 A. in, Mr. Scarola, though I'd like to answer 16 Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right in + +1 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 1 2 any other person knowing the individual identified by 2 identified by the initials L.M.? 3 the initials L.M.? 3 A. I'm going to have to refuse to answer that 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 question. 6 the question, sir? 6 J. that you knew L.M.? 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 MR. PIKE: Again, for purposes of the record, 8 Q. Yes, sir. Have you ever acknowledged in the 8 I'm instructing you to invoke the Fifth, Sixth and 9 presence of any other person knowing the individual 9 14th, rather than just simply say — 10 identified by the initials L.M.? 10 THE WITNESS: Okay. 11 MR. PIKE: Form. Also could invade 11 MR. PIKE: —1 refuse to answer. I want it 12 attorney/client. 12 to be clear for the Court that y ye invoked 13 THE WITNESS: Again, I would like to answer 13 your Fifth, Sixth and 14th. 14 that question, but today I'm going to have to 19 THE WITNESS: Fin 15 invoke my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th 15 Then on advice of , I'm going to have 16 Amendment Right. 16 to invoke my Fi 4th Amendment Right. 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 17 BY MR. SCAROL 18 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 18 Q. Have 19 any person, other than your own lawyer, having known the 19 presence that u ilk the individual identified by the 20 individual identified by the initials L.M.? 20 initials M.? 21 MR. PIKE: Form. 21 I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth, 22 THE WITNESS: Again, I'd like to answer each 22 I Amendment Right, Mr. Scarola. 23 and every one of your questions here today, 23 you ever acknowledged in 24 Mr. Scarola: however, on advice of Counsel, at 24 y that you liked L.M.? 25 least today, I'm going to have to refuse to answer Again, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to + +J. that you knew the individual 5 THE WITNESS: Again? Sony. Can you repeat 5 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of e wledged in Brad + +1 that question. 3 Q. Have you ever acknowledged to — 3 Terri Becker, a court reporter present at a deposition 4 A. Excuse me. 4 taken by Brad in a — in a case in which the 5 Q. - -- 5 individual identified by the initials L.M. was a 6 A. Sir, may 1 suggest that if I sa Ire o 6 Plaintiff that you knew and/or liked -- 7 answer, that it means the Fifth, Sixth h or would 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 8 you prefer that I recite it eac ' 9 8 THE WITNESS: Again.- 9 Q. I would prefer that yo the questions. 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 that's my preference t if y going to assert a 10 Q. — L.M.? 11 privilege, I will that if you simply say that you 11 MR. PIKE: Same objection. 12 arc refusing t refusal to answer will be 12 THE WITNESS: Again, I'm going to have to 13 on the basis vari Constitutional privileges 13 assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 14 against ' ' • tion without the necessity of 14 BY MIL SCAROLA: 15 15 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 16 I ur refusal to answer is on the basis of 16 Steve Jaffe that you knew and/or liked L.M.? 17 any other 'vilege, it will be necessary for you to 17 A. Again, Mr. Scarola, though I'd like to answer 18 identify that privilege. 18 each and every one of your questions today, I'm going to 19 A. Thank you. 19 have to, at the advice of Counsel, invoke my Fifth, 20 MR. PIKE: And I'm going to instruct you, too, 20 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 21 when you do invoke, invoke the Fifth, Sixth and the 21 Q. Why arc you suing L.M.? 22 14th. 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 THE WITNESS: Yes. 23 MR. SCAROLA: Let me state for the record that 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 I don't consider a form objection to be a proper 25 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of 25 objection, unless you specify the defect in the + +invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 2 Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of + +1 form and provide me with an opportunity to correct +2 the defect. + +3 MR. PIKE: That's fine. I believe the rules +4 provide otherwise. But, nonetheless, I stand on my +5 objection to form. + +6 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. You have to repeat +7 the question. + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +9 Q. Why are you suing L.M.? + +10 MR. PIKE: Form. + +11 THE WITNESS: L.M. is part of a conspiracy +12 with Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED], creating -- +13 excuse me -- creating fraudulent cases of a +14 sexually charged nature in which the U.S. Attorney +15 has already charged the firm of Rothstein, a firm +16 of which [REDACTED] is a partner, was a +17 partner, with creating, fabricating malicious cases +18 of a sexual nature, including cases with respect to +19 me, specifically, in order to fleece unsuspecting +20 investors in South Florida out of millions of +21 dollars. + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +23 Q. What role do you contend L.M. played in that +24 conspiracy to create fraudulent cases? + +25 A. L.M.'s testimony before she met Mr. [REDACTED] + +1 lawyer, you've read the testimony. I would guess +2 you've read the difference in her testimony to the +3 FBI versus her testimony after she's met your +4 client and his partners, who are currently in jail. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. How does that respond to my question as to +7 whether you contend that her testimony to the FBI was +8 true or false? + +9 MR. PIKE: Form. + +10 THE WITNESS: I don't believe that was your +11 question. Will you repeat? + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Okay. Well, let's -- let me rephrase the +14 question then. + +15 Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to +16 the FBI was true? + +17 A. Sir, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm +18 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th +19 Amendment Right. + +20 Q. Was L.M.'s statement to the FBI false in any +21 respect? + +22 A. Sir, at least, again, today, on advice of +23 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +24 14th Amendment Right. + +25 Q. Was L.M.'s subsequent testimony after, + +1 was dramatically -- sworn testimony to the FBI was +2 dramatically different after she came in contact with +3 Mr. [REDACTED], where her testimony then changed to +4 sort of a hostile and had claims of -- claims never made +5 before, never made to anyone before, and allegations +6 that I've read in her Complaint that that had been +7 dramatically different from the ones she had spoken to +8 the FBI about, sir. + +9 Q. Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to +10 the FBI was true? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. + +12 THE WITNESS: Mr. Scarola, unfortunately, +13 today with respect to that question, I'm going to +14 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment +15 Right. Though I know -- I believe you know the +16 answer to that question, I can't answer the +17 question under advice of Counsel. And he's told me +18 if I chose to do so, I risk losing his +19 representation. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. What is the basis of your belief that I know +22 the answer to the question? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: You -- I believe you have seen +25 this, because you're supposed to be a decent + +1 according to you, she met Mr. [REDACTED] and changed her +2 testimony, true? + +3 A. Did she change her testimony? Is that -- yes, +4 her testimony was changed. + +5 Q. My question to you is: Was her testimony +6 which you contend was changed true testimony? + +7 A. Your question is not a good question. Is it +8 her testimony before or after? + +9 Q. Was the subsequent testimony given by L.M. +10 after she met Mr. [REDACTED] which you contend was +11 different from her testimony before the FBI, was the +12 subsequent testimony true or false? + +13 MR. PIKE: Form. + +14 THE WITNESS: Sir, I'm going, at least today, +15 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +16 14th Amendment Right. + +17 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +18 Q. Did you ever engage in any sexual conduct with +19 L.M.? + +20 A. I would like to answer that question, but -- + +21 Q. You don't need to tell me what you'd like to +22 do, Mr. Epstein. You just need to do it, please. + +23 THE WITNESS: Please -- + +24 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, please let the witness +25 finish his response. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: That's not a response to my 1 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer each and 2 question. 2 every one of your questions here today, + +3 MR. PIKE: In your mind it may not be a 3 Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Counsel, today. + +4 response. In a Judge's mind, it may be. We may 4 I'm going to have to assert my Filth, Sixth and 5 have to certify it to the Court. If such a 5 14th Amendment Right. 6 procedure even exists, we can take it up with the 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 Court. But please let the witness finish his 7 Q. Your Complaint in this action alleges that + +8 response. 8 L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to her + +9 THE WITNESS: Again, please? 9 alleged damages. What does that mean? + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 A. It means what it says. + +11 Q. Did you engage — ever engage in any sexual 11 Q. I don't understand it. Explain it to me. + +12 conduct with L.M.? 12 MR. PIKE: To the extent yot4 can answer that + +13 A. I would like to answer that question; however, 13 question without disclosingity\_clinversations with 14 today I'm going to have to assert my rights as provided 14 you or Mr. Crinon's conversations with you, as 15 by the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment to that question. 15 well as my work armlet:4),mi can answer the 16 sir. 16 question. + +17 Q. Have you ever exchanged anything of value with 17 THE : I `'etdiat as pan of the + +18 L.M.? 18 scheme to ra ors in South Florida out of + +19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 millions o claims of outrageous sums of 20 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'M going to 20 . 4 were on behalf of alleged victims across + +21 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment 21 , And the only way — in fact, Scott + +22 Right, sir. 22 ' . , ' ' sits in jail. And what I've read in the + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 aims that I've settled cases for + +24 Q. Did you ever direct anyone to deliver anything 24 million, which is totally not true. + +25 of value to L.M.? She has made claims of serious sum of money. + +1 MR. PIKE: Form. which is outrageous. + +2 THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm goi . ivEll 7 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 have to refuse to answer that question . , v 3 Q. How much have you settled claims for? + +4 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. 4 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 answer that question. + +6 Q. Do you know 6 MR. SCAROLA: And the basis of that + +7 A. At least today, sir, I'm going t o 7 instruction is? 10 and 14th AmendmentAiti t. 10 be confidential. + +B refuse to testify about that q n. Based on advice 8 MR. PIKE: Confidential settlement agreements, 9 of Counsel, I'm going to have my Fifth, Sixth 9 to the extent that they exist. And the terms would + +11 Q. Did introduce you to L.M.? 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +12 A. Sir, lylltplike to answer that 12 Q. Have you settled claims? 13 question t . As id, I'd like to answer each and 13 A. Yes, 1 have. 14 every o dons. However, on advice of my 14 Q. What is the nature of the claims you settled? 15 C m going to have to assert my Fifth, 15 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to 16 Sixth • 4th Amendment Right. 16 answer that question. + +17 Q. Di. M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 any interaction between you and L.M.? 18 Q. How many claims have you settled? + +19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you not to + +20 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question, 20 answer that question as well. + +21 please? 21 MR. SCAROLA: What is the basis for those + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 instructions? + +23 Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of 23 MR. PIKE: Confidential, as well as there is a + +24 any interaction between you and L.M.? 24 Victim's Right Statute that may — you may be 25 MR. PIKE: Form. 25 tiptoeing into the identity of - + +1 MR. SCAROLA: I'm not tiptoeing anywhere. 1 answer that question based on my Fifth Amendment, + +2 MR. PIKE: Let me finish my objection, 2 Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 3 Mr. Scarola. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 You may be tiptoeing into the identity of 4 Q. Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't 5 various alleged victims underneath the Victims 5 have done that forms the basis of your lawsuit against + +6 Right Statute, as well as ongoing investigations or 6 him? 7 past investigations that have remained open with 7 MR. PIKE Form. 8 the State, as well as the Federal Government. 8 THE WITNESS: Yes, many things. 9 So in that regard, we would have to put the 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 State Attorney, as well as the Federal Government 10 Q. List them for me, please. 11 on notice that you were seeking to potentially back 11 A. He has — he has gone to the media out of, I + +12 door certain identities at this deposition. 12 believe, in an attempt to gin up t allegations. He + +13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 has contacted the media. He the media for hi.. 14 Q. Other than having allegedly given different 14 own purposes. He has brougild — he has 15 testimony before she met Mr. then given after 15 engaged in discovery procecdhs that bear no 1 6 she met Mr. IM, did L.M. do anything else that 16 relationship to any filed against me by any of his 17 forms the basis for your claim against her? 17 clients. + +18 MR. PIKE: Form. Asked and answered. 18 His 1i is he's the partner of, has been 1 9 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer that 19 accused off ng a cdcral Judge's signature. 20 question, as well as every one of your questions 20 Q. I want v what Mr. — 21 with respect to L.M. here today; however, on advice 21 IKE: One second. 22 of Counsel, at least today, Mr. Searola, I'm going 22 E TNESS: Excuse me. I'm answering. 23 to have to assert my Sixth Amendment, Fifth 23 B AROLA: 24 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 24 want to know what Mr. did. I'm not + +25 BY MR\_ SCAROLA: 2 g you about allegations concerning his law firm. + +1 Q. Did L.M. fail to do anything that she had an . + +) fr., + +MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, that's the second time 2 obligation, duty or responsibility to do — 2 that I'm going to ask you not to interrupt the 3 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 witness when he's giving a response. He is giving 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 4 a response. When he finishes his response, you can 5 Q. — that fortes the basis for your 5 go on with your next question or you can — you can 6 her? 6 elicit any sort of information you intend to elicit + +7 MR. PIKE: I apologize. Form. 7 from the witness. 8 THE WITNESS: Agai m sorry. Has she 8 MR. SCAROLA: He's being unresponsive. 9 failed to do? Can you 9 MR. PIKE: No, that's your contention. + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 MR. SCAROLA: No, that's a fact. 11 Q. Yes, sir. s are generally based, civil 11 MR. PIKE: And you can take it up with a 12 lawsuits are on a claim that someone has 12 Judge. And if we want to continue going back and 13 done cy shouldn't have done or failed 13 forth and bantering, not allowing the witness to + +14 to do so y should have done. 14 answer the question — we're here for you today, 17 privilege' refusing to answer that question. 17 witness and interrupt the witness, I will adjourn + +15 u whether L.M. did anything that she 15 for you to ask the questions and for you to get 16 shouldn • ye done and you asserted a Fifth Amendment 16 answers. But if you continue to banter with the + +18 I'm now attempting to find out whether L.M. 18 the deposition. This is not proper and we 19 failed to do something that she should have done that 19 certainly can take it up with the Judge. So that's 20 forms the basis of your claims against her. 20 the second warning, Mr. Scarola. Please — + +21 Did L.M. do anything that she should have done 21 MR. SCAROLA: How many do I get? 22 that forms the basis of your claims against hcr? 22 MR. PIKE: I'm not sure yet today. + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. 24 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, at least 24 MR. PIKE: Okay? 25 today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to 25 MR. SCAROLA: Good. Then let's move on. + +1 MR. PIKE: But I can tell you one thing: On a 1 witness' testimony as well. 2 professional nature, just because you are 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 interrupting the witness and bantering with me, l 3 Q. Do you understand the question that you're 4 will adjourn the deposition. 4 supposed to be answering? 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 MR. PIKE: Well, let's go ahead and repeat it. 6 Q. Besides having gone to the media in an attempt 6 MR. SCAROLA: No, let's get an — let's get an 7 to, quote, gin up, unquote, thcsc allegations and 7 answer to that question. 8 engaged in what you contend to be irrelevant discovery 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 that forms the basis for this lawsuit? 10 to be answering? 11 A. Mr. MI, personally, engaged with his 11 A. When — 12 partners, Scott Rothstein, who sits in a Federal jail 12 MR. PIKE: I'm confused. ait one second. 13 cell, potentially for the rest of his life, he shared 13 THE WITNESS: Sony 14 information, what I've been told and — excuse me -- 14 MR. PIKE: I'm conf as t question is 15 what I've read in the newspapers, 13 boxes of 15 on the table. 1 6 information that had my name on it, with other attorneys 16 MR. SCARO . your deposition is 17 at his firm. 17 being taken, con is relevant and 18 He counseled his clients to maintain a 18 material. 19 position alleging multi-million dollar damages in order 19 MR. P Ri I. And it's — 20 for them to scam local investors out of millions of 20 MR. S : When Mr. — excuse 21 dollars. 21 — t Mr. Epstein's deposition is being taken. 22 He and his — many of his other partners 22 I • n ed with whether he understands the 23 already under investigation by the FBI and the U.S. 23 being asked. 24 Attorney have been accused by the U.S. Attorney of 24 PIKE Right. So... 25 running a criminal enterprise. 2 R. SCAROLA: + +9 proceedings, what else did Mr. personally, do 9 Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed ".. + +1 Q. Anything else? 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 2 to be answering, Mr. Epstein? 3 THE WITNESS: Not I can think o 3 MR. PIKE: And I'm going to instruct you not 4 moment. 4 to answer that question right now because as your 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Counsel I cannot let you answer that question until 6 Q. Okay. What media did Mr go to? 6 I understand what question is on the table. 7 A. I am aware of at least the D ws in New 7 There's been a lot of bantering back and 8 York City. 8 forth, so, Mr. Scarola, if you would respectfully 9 I have been told by o ple that there 9 repeat the question and then you may be able to ask 10 were other media, local medi 10 him whether or not he understands the question. :1 I've been told that the — his investigator 11 But I cannot allow him to answer a question that I :2 was sent to California to harass people representing 12 don't understand is on the table. 13 his — Bra investigator — representing 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 fictitio ntly that he was a FBI agent to 14 Q. What does an investigator going to California 16 Q. that have something to do with going to 16 in an attempt to, quote, gin up, unquote, these 17 the medi 17 allegations? 18 MR. PIKE Form. 18 MR. PIKE: Please answer the question. L 9 THE WITNESS: I've answered your question. 19 THE WITNESS: Good. It's part of Mr. 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 scheme to involve people who have nothing to,:,, 21 Q. Does the investigator going to California to 21 with any of his cases in order to, in fact, go back 22 do something have something to do with the media? 22 to the media and gin up his stories and make false 2 3 A. I believe I've also told that you that he's 23 allegations of people that have sexually charged 24 gone to the Daily News, sir, is that correct? 24 nature cases in order to attempt to fleece 25 MR. PIKE Form. Mischaracterizes the 25 investors, local investors out of millions of + +Q. Do you understand the question you're supposed 15 try formation for Mr. claims. 15 have to do with Mr. allegedly going to the med Li + +1 dollars. 1 A. I don't recall with specificity. 2 His firm has been accused by the U.S. Attorney 2 Q. Well, do you recall in any degree how many 3 of manipulating the media, by hiring investigators. 3 there were? 4 by illegal wire taps, by illegal methods of 4 A. I would say, probably five to ten. 6 generate cases. 6 place that you can't — the identity of whose 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 participants you can't remember? 8 Q. When did Mr. go to the Daily News? 8 MR. PIKE: So we're clear, within the last 9 A. I don't know. 9 year — correct? — timewise? 10 Q. How did he go to the Daily News? 10 MR. SCAROLA: Well, that's what your client 11 A. I don't know. 11 said. I don't believe a word he says, but that's 12 Q. What did he sit, Daily News? 12 what he said. 13 A. I believe Mr. knows that. I don't 13 MR. PIKE: Form. Ob' ti . Overbroad. 14 know exactly what he said. 14 THE WITNESS: s 15 Q. What is the source of your information that he 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 16 went to the Daily News at all, ever? 16 Q. Yes, sir. Where did these conversations with 17 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that 17 these five to ten place whose identity you 18 question without violating any attorney/client 18 19 privileges, you can answer the questions. 19 MR. P •F 20 THE WITNESS: It's attorney/client 20 THE S: On the telephone. 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 BY ROLA: 22 Q. You said you were told by other people that he 22 initiated the phone calls? 23 went to other media representatives? 23 , these questions, I have no —I don't 24 A. Yes, sir. 24 y recollection. + +5 eavesdropping in order to go to the media and 5 Q. Where were you when these conversations took a peoec can't remern . 25 Q. Who are the other people that told you that? 2 Did the people who were on the phone identity + +- A. I don't recall at the moment. themselves or were these anonymous callers? 2 Q. What did these other who you don' 777 2 MR. PIKE: Form 3 remember tell you Mr. did with res to 3 THE WITNESS: Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola. 4 media representatives besides the Daily N 4 I don't recall with specificity. 5 A. Again, the question again? 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q. What did these other people to 6 Q. What specifically did Mr. allegedly 7 Mr. did with respect to going media? 7 communicate to the Daily News to, quote, gin up these 8 MR. PIKE: Form. 8 allegations. unquote? 9 THE WITNESS: Mr. Gent to the media to 9 A. The newspapers have quoted Mr. — not :0 gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm 10 quoted Mr. — newspapers have made allegations referred 11 could generate profits, falsely taking in 11 to as Mr. statements. : 2 investors, creating liaise stories to the local 12 MR. SCAROLA: Would you read the question : 3 medias a taking statements to local press 13 back, please, Sandy? :4 reg made by his clients in order 14 (Pending question was read.) :5 stein, who currently sits in jail, 15 MR. PIKE: Did he answer your question? :6 could fraud, along with his other partners of his 16 MR. SCAROLA: No. :7 firm, I I Florida investors, Mr. Scarola, out of 17 Ma PIKE: Are you asking him again? :8 millions of dollars. 18 THE WITNESS: So you're asking the question :9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 again? 2- 0 Q. When did these other people whose identity you 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 can't remember tell you these things that Brad 21 Q. Yes. 22 did? 22 THE WITNESS: Sony. Could you repeat the 23 A. Sometime in the past year. 23 question again? 24 Q. How many °the/lily= there who told you 24 (Pending question was read.) 25 these things about Mr. . 25 THE WITNESS: He alleged that third parties + +1 had already been involved in some allegations to do 1 of the files and documents that we've requested from mendment and 14th 20 based on cases that didn't exist or alleged cases 20 Sixth 14th Amendment Right to remain 21 that I had settled. 21 sit hat you mean when you use the words "gin + +2 with sexual misconduct 2 Mr. and the Rothstein firm are still 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 unavailable. 4 Q. Which third parties? 4 With respect to anything that I can point to 5 A. I don't recall sitting here today. 5 today, I'm, unfortunately, going to have to take the 6 Q. Involved how? 6 Fifth Amendment on that, Sixth and 14th. 7 MR. PIKE: Font 7 Q. You seemed to be defining ginned up as 8 THE WITNESS: If I recall with specificity, if 8 crafted; is that correct? 9 I had the articles in front of me, I would be able 9 A. That's correct. :0 to recall. Maybe next time. 10 Q. Does ginned up or crafted mean fabricated? 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: 11 MR. PIKE: Font 12 Q. What does "gin up these allegations" mean? 1.2 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry, r. Scarola. I 13 MR. PIKE: Form. 13 understand that you arc tryi to k door your 14 THE WITNESS: It means craft allegations of 14 way into a waiver of m t. But 15 multi-million dollar cases; in fact, alleging in 15 respect to that questi mg o have assert 16 L.M.'s case damages of S50-million, settlements in 16 my Fifth 17 order for Scou Rothstein and the rest of 17 Amendment • . 18 Mr. partners to fleece unsuspecting 18 BY MR. SC 19 investors out of millions and millions of dollars 19 Q. So yo a-' !ng your Fifth Amendment. 22 Can I take a break? 22 et is that correct? 23 VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record, 10:50. 23 't believe that was your question. 24 (Brief recess.) 24 es, sir, that's exactly my question. 25 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now on video record at Would you repeat the question for me? + +777 + +1. 10:57 a.m. Q. I want to know whether when you use the phrase 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: n 7 2 "gin up" and the word "crafted," which you have told us 11 have been brought; ginned up, meaning, crafted, 11 Mr. engage in which you contend form the basi. + +3 Q. Was your reference to, quote, gin u h 3 is synonymous with gin up, -- 4 allegations, unquote, a reference to alle made 4 A. Yes. 5 against you? 5 Q. — you mean fabricated? 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 6 A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel, sir, and 7 THE WITNESS: As part of conspiracy 7 I've answered that question before, but if you didn't 8 of the Rothstein firm an 8 hear me the first time, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth 9 participation in it, it has ed that many 9 and 14th Amendment Right. 10 casts were fraudutently bra ht — alleged that 10 Q. What specific discovery proceedings did 12 multi-mill dollar numbers put on cases in order 12 for your lawsuit? 13 to fleece vest() , where his partner, Scott 13 A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my 14 R ly sits in jail for just those 14 attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with 15 r. Scarola. 15 any of his clients or these lawsuits. 16 BY MR. CAROLA: 16 Q. Which various people? Who? 17 Q. M question to you is: Did the reference to, 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 18 quote, gin up these allegations refer to allegations 18 THE WITNESS: For example, he tried to depose 19 against you? 19 Bill Clinton, strictly as a means of getting 20 A. Reported in the newspaper the answer is, yes. 20 publicity so that he and his fine could 21 And others, but specifically me, yes, by the newspaper 21 fraudulently steal, craft money from unsuspecting 22 reports. 22 investors in South Florida out of millions of 23 Q. Specifically what arc the against 23 dollars. 24 you which you contend Mr. ginned up? 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 25 A. I would like to answer that question. A, many 25 Q. Who else besides Bill Clinton is included in + +1. your reference to various people? 1 Are you now telling us that there were claims 2 A. There arc people in California. There arc 2 against you that were fabricated by Mr. 3 people in New York. 3 A. I'm going to again assert my Fifth, Sixth and 4 Q. Would you name them for us, please? 4 14th Amendment Right, sir. 5 A. I'm sorry. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, 5 I would respond that the newspapers are very 6 rm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth 6 clear that the cases were fabricated. 7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. 7 Q. Which newspaper said which case was 8 Q. Let's then talk about Bill Clinton, by whom I 8 fabricated? 9 assume you mean Conner President Clinton; is that 9 A. Bob Norman's blog said most of the cases were 10 correct? 10 fabricated, to my best recollection. 11 A. That's correct. 11 The Scherer Complaint alleged many fabricated 12 Q. All right. Do you know former President 12 cases, sir. 13 Clinton personally? 13 Q. Well, which of Mr. cases do you 14 A. I'm sorry. As I sit here today, though I'd 14 contend were fabricated? 15 like to answer that question, on advice of my Counsel, 15 A. Again, we've •= fthc — 1 6 at least today, I'm going to have to take the Fifth. 16 information from trustee. We've been 17 Sixth and 14th Amendment. 17 unable — Mr. has given us the total file, 18 Q. You said something about Mr. sharing 18 but aspect to I would have — at the 19 13 boxes of information with somebody -- 19 moment I wo d hay- to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 20 A. Yes. 20 Amendment c r. 21 Q. — as forming part of the basis for your 21 u will not answer questions about whether 22 lawsuit against Mr. correct? 22 c • half of L.M. was fabricated; is that 23 A. Correct. 23 24 Q. All right. With whom did Mr. 24 believe I've already answered that, but, if 25 these 13 boxes of information? 2 rit have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +1 A. It has been reported in the Scherer Complaint 1 Amendment Right. sir. 2 that he shared those boxes with the partners of If 2 Q. Your Complaint also makes reference to a claim 3 that was then formally accused by the U.S. A 3 on behalf of Jane Doe, referred to as Jane Doe versus 5 MR. PIKE: And just for pu — ) 5 United States District Court for the Southern District 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 of Florida. 7 Q. Do you remember my question 7 Is it your contention that the claim on behalf 8 A. You asked me who he it with? 8 of lane Doe is a fabricated claim? 9 Q. Yes. 9 A. Sr, though I'd like to answer that question, 10 A. The partners o fur, . 10 as well as every one of your other questions here today. 11 Q. Ogr o l the basis of your lawsuit is 11 today Iln going to have to assert my rights as under the 12 that Mr. allo''ed members of his own law firm to 12 Constitution of the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. 13 see 13 =formation; is that correct? 13 Q. Do you know the real name of the person 14 A. No, that's not correct. My claim is that the 14 referred to as Jane Doe in that case? 15 13 boxes ofinfonnation that were shown to investors by 15 A. I don't know which — I'm sorry, sir. I do 16 Mr. partners, 13 boxes that we've been told by 16 not, sitting here today. 17 the press c tain multiple cases, fraudulently — and if 17 Q. Did you ever have personal contact with the 18 you like the word — fabricated in order to fleece 18 person referred to by the name Jane Doe in that lawsuit? 19 20 investors out of smo eni. The 13 boxes were shared with investors, Mr. Mr. partners and some 21 of those partners currently under inditement, the others 21 Right. 22 already sitting in jail. 22 Q. When did you first meet the person referred to 23 Q. I had asked you earlier whether ginned up and 23 as Jane Doe? 24 crafted meant fabricated and you asserted your Fifth 24 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each and every 25 Amendment privilege. 25 one of your questions here today, at least with respect + +4 sir, of being a criminal enterprise. 4 Epstein, case number 08-C1V-80893, a case pending in the 19 20 A. I'm sorry, sir. Sitting here today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment + +1 to that question, I'm going to have to assert my rights +2 under the Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth +3 Amendment. + +4 Q. Where did you first meet the person referred +5 to as Jane Doe? + +6 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question +7 here today, at least today on advice of Counsel, I'm +8 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth +9 Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +10 Q. How many times have you been in the physical +11 presence of the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +12 A. The person referred to as Jane Doe? + +13 Q. Yeah. How many times have you been in her +14 physical presence? + +15 MR. PIKE: Form. + +16 THE WITNESS: At least -- at least sitting +17 here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to +18 assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th +19 Amendment Right. + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with +22 Jane Doe? + +23 MR. PIKE: Form. + +24 THE WITNESS: Now, for this purposes, you're +25 assuming this Jane Doe is somebody I know? I don't + +1 think so, since this question makes no sense to me. +2 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +3 Q. You have alleged in your Complaint that there +4 is a claim on behalf of Jane Doe versus Epstein pending +5 in the Federal District Court of the Southern District +6 of Florida. + +7 I would like to know whether you ever had any +8 physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe +9 in that Complaint? + +10 A. Ah, that Jane Doe. I'm sorry. But sitting +11 here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to +12 answer that question based on the Fifth Amendment, Sixth +13 Amendment and 14th Amendment. + +14 Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with +15 Jane Doe? + +16 A. Again, Mr. Scarola, sitting here today, I'm +17 going to have to on advice of Counsel assert my Sixth +18 Amendment, Fifth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +19 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to a case +20 styled, E.W. versus Epstein, case number +21 502008CA028058XXXXXMBAB, a case pending in the Circuit +22 Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. + +23 Do you know who E.W. is? + +24 A. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to +25 have to assert my rights as under the Fifth, Sixth and + +1 14th Amendment. + +2 Q. Have you ever learned the real name of E.W.? +3 A. Yes, sir. + +4 Q. Did that person whose real name you learned +5 ever spend any time in your physical presence? + +6 A. Sir, at least sitting here today, I would like +7 to answer each and every one of your questions regarding +8 your E.W. and -- are we not allowed to use the names of +9 these people, sir? + +10 MR. PIKE: In the past -- in the past cases +11 the names of these individuals have been utilized +12 for deposition purposes. + +13 Brad [REDACTED], sitting here today, knows that +14 we have used; however, any documents that are filed +15 with the Court will redact those names. + +16 So the answer to the question is, yes, for +17 purposes of this deposition, to the extent you know +18 the names of individuals, you can utilize them with +19 agreement of Mr. [REDACTED]. + +20 MR. [REDACTED]: I have no problem with that. + +21 THE WITNESS: I think to avoid confusion, so +22 there's not -- I know who you're talking about. +23 That's all. + +24 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +25 Q. What is the real name of the person referred + +1 to as E.W.? + +2 A. I believe it is E.W. + +3 Q. How long have you known E.W.? + +4 A. Well, with respect to that question, +5 Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth +6 and 14th Amendment Rights, though I'd like to answer +7 every, single question you have about E.W. + +8 Q. How many times have you been in the physical +9 presence of E.W.? + +10 A. I'd like to answer every question about E.W. +11 that you have today, Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of +12 Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and +13 14th Amendment Right. + +14 Q. How old is E.W.? + +15 A. I don't know. + +16 Q. How old was she when you met her? + +17 A. Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to assert my +18 rights under the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment on +19 advice of Counsel, though I would like to answer every +20 one of these questions. + +21 Q. Did you ever have any physical contact with +22 E.W.? + +23 A. Mr. Scarola, once again, I would like to +24 answer each one of your questions here today, but on +25 advice of Counsel I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, + +1 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 1 the course of this deposition, which you allege fonn the 2 Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with 2 basis for your claim against Mr. 3 E.W.? 3 Is it your contention that among those thing, 4 A. Sir, I'd like to answer every question you 4 Mr. did that forth the basis for your lawsuit is 5 have about E.W.; however, today, on advice of Counsel 5 to have counseled his clients to make multi-million 6 I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, sixth and 14th 6 dollar claims against you? 7 Amendment Right 7 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 9 delivered to E.W.? 9 that the claims purported to have been made by the 10 A. Mr. Scarola, as I've answered most of your 10 Rothstein firm and its partners allege 11 questions here today regarding E.W., I would like to 11 multi-million dollar claims where no claims exist. 12 answer every question regarding E.W.; however, today, on 12 However, i t specifically my claim 13 advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, 13 today, I'm going to have as ifth, Sixth and 14 Sixth and 14th Amendment Right because though I would 14 14th Amendment Right. 15 choose to do so, I've been told that if I do so, I risk 15 MR. PIKE: Also, th on nuscharacterizes 16 losing my Counsel's representation. 16 the witness' t 17 Q. What is the actual value that you contend the 17 BY MR. SCAROL 19 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. 19 initiated litigation against you? 20 THE WITNESS: Sir, though I'd like to answer 20 A. I uld like Micnow the answer to that 21 every question about E.W. and her claims and the 21 qu 22 claims of your other people, on advice of Counsel 22 . answer to that question is, I don't 23 here today, I cannot do so. 1 must assert my 23 24 rights under the Sixth, Fifth and 14th Amendment. 24 would like — 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: . Correct? + +8 Q. Did you ever cause any money or gifts to be 8 11lE WITNESS: What the newspapers have said is 18 claim of E.W. against you has? 18 Q. By whom was employed when he + +1 Q. Would your answer be the same with regard to 2 L.M. and to Jane Doc? 2 like to know. 3 4 MR. PIKE: I'm going to instruct you answer is the same, to invoke in full. S THE WITNESS: With respect ant 5 employed at the time that he initiated litigation 8 Q. L.M. 8 question, sir. 9 A. L.M. Though I'd like r your claims 9 Q. Among the allegations of wrongdoing against 10 with icspy,t to all f Mr. clients, on 10 Mr. which you contend form the basis of this 11 advice of Counsel t t today, I'm going to have to 11 lawsuit is something having to do with sending an 12 invoke my Fi th 4th Amendment Rights. 12 investigator to California. 13 Though I'd swer the question, I've been told 13 Would you tell rte, p\*lease, more specifically 14 that if I I risk losing their 14 what it is that Mr. did with regard to sending 15 15 an investigator to California which you contend 16 Q. those items listed by you as wrongdoing 16 justifies a legal claim against Mr. 17 on the of Mr. foming the basis for this 17 MIL PIKE: Form. And also mischaracteriyes 18 lawsuit is that he, quote, counseled his clients to make 18 the witness' testimony. 19 multi-million dollar claims against you; is that 19 THE WITNESS: Reported widely in the 20 correct? 20 newspapers is the use of illegal activities, wire 21 MR. PIKE: Form. Document speaks for itself. 21 taps, and methods by the Rothstein firm while 22 THE WITNESS: Document speaks for itself. 22 Mr. had basically been bringing these 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 casts. 24 Q. I'm not asking about a document I'm asking 24 The investigator, Mr. Piston, who's mentioned 25 you about the list of wrongdoing that you gave us during 25 in the Complaint, represented himself as an FBI + +isr, Page 1 + +A. No. I answered that question, which is, I'd 3 4 Q. Yes. But that isn't an answer to myita.n. My question is: By whom was Mr. 6 Doc — and who is the other perso 6 against you? Do you know the answer to that question'? 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 A. I'd have no way of knowing the answer to that + +1 agent, falsely represented himself as an FBI agent. 1 methods. Mr. Sakowitz, who was approached as an 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 investor, and Mr. Scherer, who's filed a Complaint, 3 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of anything 3 alleges similar activities. But personal knowledge 4 that Mr. Fisten did while Mr. Fisten was in California? 4 myself, sir, no. 5 MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer 5 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 6 that question without disclosing my conversation or 6 was ever involved in obstructions of 7 my firm's conversation or any of your attorneys' 7 justice? 8 conversations with you, you can answer the 8 MR. PIKE: To the extent that you can answer 9 question. 9 that question without disclosing any 10 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. Based on 10 attorney/client communications with any of your 11 attomey/client privilege, I can't answer. 11 attorneys, you can answer that question. 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 12 THE WITNESS: It's attom client privilege, 13 Q. Is it your contention that Mr. was 13 Pm afraid. 14 involved in an illegal wire tap? 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: 15 A. It was widely reported in the newspaper -- 15 Q. Do you have any I knowledge that 16 Q. Pm not asking it was reported -- 16 w ' in any actionable 17 A. Excuse me. 17 frauds? 18 Q. — in the newspaper. 18 MR. P : me instruction, with any 19 A. Excuse mc. 19 of your la as. 20 Q. I want to know whether your contention is that 20 : Yes. Outside of the newspaper,. 21 Mr. was involved in an illegal wire tap. 21 ich excused his firm of a monstrous fraud. 22 MR. PIKE: Try once again to answer that 22 to be the largest fraud in South 23 question. 23 s history, accused by the U.S. Attorney 24 THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the 24 re his partner sits in jail — excuse me — 25 newspaper that his firm and his partners were ported in the newspapers of boxes of material on + +Page 5 1 involved in illegal wire taps, eavesdropping, hired Jeffrey Epstein, separate and apart from the 2 former FBI and law enforcement officials in 7 2 allegations of fraud by his partners, I cannot 3 to fabricate cases of a sexually charged na 3 answer that question because of attorney/client 4 against me and others. 4 privilege. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q. Do you have any personal ledge 1 6 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 7 Mr. ever having engaged in a I wire tap? 7 was involved in any egregious civil 8 A. I have no personal kn e; however, what I 8 litigation abuses? 9 read in the newspapers and is ' posed is that 9 MR. PIKE: Form. Confusing. 10 his rum, and I believ Sako ' went to the FBI 10 THE WITNESS: It's widely reported in the 11 after he was told tinn was engaged in illegal 11 newspaper that Mr. MI' firm engaged in 12 wire taps and Ili e engaged in illegal wire 12 discovery processes, illegal activities, illegal 13 taps. 13 eavesdropping in order to fleece unsuspecting 14 The FBI. the U. . Attorney has accused his 14 investors in South Florida out of millions in 15 firm of RICO, being the largest criminal fraud 15 dollars by crafting, fabricating malicious cases of 16 enterprise in South Florida's history and engaged in 16 a sexually charged nature in order to perpetrate a 17 illegal wire taps. But the answer specifically to your 17 fraud. 18 question about personal knowledge, sir, no. 18 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 Q. Do you have any personal knowledge of 19 Dic.tave any personal knowledge that 20 Mr. ever having been involved in any illegal or 20 21 improper eavesdropping? 21 Opinions? 22 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers in 22 A. It's attorney/client privilege. 23 South Florida that Mr. firm, his partners were 23 any personal knowledge that 24 involved in illegal wire taps, illegal fact gathering, 24 25 using what the newspapers quoted as sophisticated 25 non-existing Epstein settlements? + +) fr.. Page . ... ever forged Federal Court Orders ands o: ..Di.ltave was ever involved in the marketing of + +1. MR. PIKE: Same instruction. 1 justice systems in South Florida? 2 THE WITNESS: Fm sorry. I would like to 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 answer that question, but on attorney/client 3 Same instruction with regard to 4 privilege I cannot today. 4 attorney/client. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 THE WITNESS: Yes. Arc you suggesting that 6 Q. It is alleged in your Complaint that you were 6 anyone who told me specifically or things that I 7 subject to, quote, abusive investigatory tactics. 7 might have read that specifically relate to him, is 8 Other than those matters previously referred 8 not what you've been asking me for? 9 to in carliesinegions, is it your contention that 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 1 0 had any personal involvement in any 10 Q. Yes, sir, that's exactly right. 11 other, quote, abusive investigatory tactics? 11 A. You told me if I hear something, that's not 12 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 personal knowledge. 13 THE WITNESS: It's been widely reported in the 13 Q. Not if you hear it from y else. 14 newspapers that Mr. firm was engaged in 14 A. Who else would I t ides 15 widely — wildly abusive practices throughout the 15 somebody else, sir? 16 State of Florida in order to fleece unsuspecting 16 Q. Well, if you ly yourself. 17 investors out of millions of dollars. 17 A. From who? 18 The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleges his firm 18 Q. Ma 19 engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. 19 A. Uh-h Is t19t the only person, sir? 20 Mr. Schemes Complaint alleges monstrous 20 Q. That's person, that's correct. 21 amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. 21 . If it's the only person, separate from 22 I have no personal knowledge, separate from 22 • /cli t privilege, I cannot answer that. 24 regarding Mr. 24 ' is lawsuit to, quote, "vindicate the 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 orking and honest lawyers and their clients who + +23 the attorney/client information, 23 . Complaint makes reference to a purpose i n + +Q. Do you have any personal knowledge that 2 ever filed legal papers that w 7 2 subject of this Complaint," unquote. 4 MR. PUCE: I'm going to object to foA 4 that you are seeking to vindicate? 5 And to the extent you can answ that 1 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 7 communications with any of your a I'm 7 arc you referring to? 8 going to allow you to an t question. 8 MR. SCAROLA: Page 2. 9 THE WITNESS: I'm a n ttomey/client 9 MR. PIKE: Give me one second. 10 privilege. 10 THE WITNESS: Can we go off the record just 11 BY MR. SCARO : 11 fora second? 12 Do y nal knowledge that 12 MR. PIKE: If it's okay with Mr. -- 13 Mr. involved in any conduct that, 13 THE WITNESS: It's a bathroom break. 14 quote, c core values of both State and 14 MR. PIKE: There's a question pending and 15 F • tents in South Florida? 15 usually — 16 PIKE: Form. 16 THE WITNESS: Sorry. 17 THE 5: Can you just ask — can you 17 MR. PIKE: Just give me a second. 18 define for me what you mean by "personal 18 Okay. 19 knowledge," sill 19 THE WITNESS: Where is it? 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 MR. PIKE: It's page 2 of the Complaint, which 21 Q. Yes. Did you ever set, hear, smell, taste, or 21 has my notes on it down here, the last sentence. 22 touch anything that communicated to you directly and not 22 And to the extent that you have knowledge and 23 diroui report of some third person or newspaper can answer that question, you can do so. 24 .itIte that 25 compromising the core values of both State and Federal 25 for me, sir? + +14) v, Page 5' were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the 3 unsupportable? 3 Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers 6 without disclosing any attomey/cli t 6 Give me a minute. What page of the Complaint 23 was personally involved in 24 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat the question + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: so that the Court can make a determination as to 2 Q. Yes, sir. Your Complaint makes reference to a 2 whether I am entitled to see it. 3 purpose in filing this lawsuit — 3 MR. PIKE: I would object based upon 4 A. Yes. 4 attorney/client and work product in that regard. 6 lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by 6 break? 7 the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint. 7 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, because you still 8 A. Yes, sir. 8 haven't answered my question. 9 Q. Who are those hardworking and honest lawyers 9 THE WITNESS: Okay. 10 on whose behalf you are bringing this Complaint? 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: I I MR. PIKE: Okay. Form. Mischaracterizes the 11 Q. I want to know who the, quote, "hardworking 12 Complaint itself. 12 and honest lawyers" are that are erred to in that 13 To the extent you understand that question, 13 section of your Complaint. 1 4 you can attempt to answer, if you recall. 14 A. My attomcys, at I t. 15 THE WITNESS: Yes. 15 Q. Which ones? 16 The U.S. Attorney, sir, has accused the 16 A. All of th 17 Rothstein firm of misusing the entire legal system, 17 Q. And yo that u t to vindicate the 18 a level of abuse never seen before in the United 18 hardworking wyers and their clients? 19 States history, of forging documents, an affront to 19 A. That' 20 any decent lawyer, signing Judges Orders, sending 20 Q. Which s? 21 false statements to other lawyers. The people who 21 me of the other clients, in fact, abused 22 have been — excuse me — the Complaint by the U.S. 22 Win firm. I don't know the full extent. 23 Attorney, in fact, describes the behavior of the 23 H u when we get to trial, we're going to find out 24 law firm, as well as Mr. — my Complaint says. 24 ent of the people, the lawyers, the clients that 25 Mr. being a part of that. abused by Mr. and the Rothstein limn. + +5 Q. — to vindicate the hardworking and honest 5 THE WITNESS: Now can we take a bathroom + +I BY MR. SCAROLA: We have asked for Scott Rothstein's 2 Q. Now, before you answered that question, 9 3 reviewed a document, right? 3 give us some insight on how other lawyers have, in fact. 5 Q. Pd like to sec it, please. 5 forging a Federal Judge's signature, sir. 6 MR. PIKE: Definitely not, Mr. 6 Q. Now, was it your intention in this sentence to 7 My notes are on that and that's 7 say that you were trying to vindicate the hardworking 8 attorney/client. I allowed fitness to take a 8 and honest lawyers and their clients? 9 look at the document and h write anything 9 A. It's attorney/client. I'm sorry. 10 on the document, caked the document. 10 Q. Your intention is attorney/client privileged? 1 1 That's my clien you will certainly not be 11 MR. PIKE: Form. I'm not quite -- 12 looking at are all over this 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 document. 13 Q. Is that what you're telling us? 14 M : He didn't look at everything. 14 MR. PIKE: Wait a second. I'm not quite sure 15 one page. I would like that one page• 15 I understand the question. 16 p 16 THE WITNESS: What's the question? 17 MR. BCE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. 17 BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 MR. SCAROLA: I would like that page marked as 18 Q. Were you attempting to communicate in this 19 an Exhibit to this deposition. 19 Complaint a desire on your part to vindicate hardworking 20 MR. PIKE: Absolutely not, Mr. Scarola. 20 and honest lawyers and their clients? 21 MR. SCAROLA: I would state for the record 21 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 that it is my intention, since that page with 22 THE WITNESS: In this Complaint, I intend to 23 handwritten notations on it was reviewed by the 23 get to the truth of Mr. behavior and the 24 witness during the course of this deposition while 24 Rothstein firm, sir. 25 a question was pending, I want that page preserved 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +deposition. We hopefully will get it. Maybe he will 4 A. The Complaint, sir. 4 been handled and the abuses they've undergone, includnig 1 2 3 Q. Well, what this sentence says is, quote, — A. Yes. Q. -- "the Rothstein racketeering enterprise 4 endeavored to compromise the core values of both State 4 Q. Is that what you meant to say? 5 and Federal systems in South Florida and to vindicate 5 A. What I meant to say, it is — seems to me 6 the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who 6 somewhat unclear — is that the Rothstein firm, along 7 were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the 7 with Mr. is part of a criminal enterprise, the + +1 2 the misconduct that is the subject of this Complaint? + +3 8 subject of this Complaint." 8 largest -- excuse me — the largest criminal enterprise + +BY MR. SCAROLA: + +9 Is that what you meant to communicate? 9 in South Florida's history, forging Judges' signatures, 10 A. It says what it says, sir. 10 engaging in illegal wire taps, illegal behaviors. And 11 Q. Well, I know it says what it says. I'm trying 11 part of this lawsuit should vindicate, which means, I 12 to find out if that's what you meant to say; that is, 12 believe should set right. 13 that the Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to 13 And if it's not clear, the Roth ein firm 14 vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their 14 compromised the core values of our legal justice system. 15 clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct 15 It abused every — many of theprecepts, the most basic 16 that is the subject of this Complaint. 16 values of the American justichustcm. + +17 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the 17 And, in fact, I believer this lawsuit, part of 18 language of the document. 18 the reason for filing this lawsuit, it will disclose the + +19 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I think you've misread 19 various techniques °I-attorney/client privilege, abuse 20 that again. You want to — I certainly didn't ask 20 of technique. abuse of discovery, illegal ait l 21 fun, 22 what you've just -- 22 + +wire for the Rothstein to vindicate the lawyers, is 21 fo si tures engaged in by both Mr. and + +23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 ts your contention that Mr. was + +24 Q. Well, that's what fm trying to find out, 24 a criminal enterprise? 25 whether you meant to say what you said in this 2 Yes, it is. + +1 Complaint. Q. Knowingly part of a criminal enterprise? 2 Did you read the Complaint before it was MR. PIKE: Form. + +3 filed? 3 THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege. + +4 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. 4 MR. SCAROLA: You wanted to take a break and 5 THE WITNESS: Thank you, sits - ) 5 before I move on to another subject, we'll do that. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 But I want — I want to observe for the record that 7 Q. Did you read the Complaint before it %lot. 7 the last break was less than an hour ago. While I B filed? 8 want to try to make reasonable accommodations to 9 A. It was a while ago, yes 9 witnesses so as not to impose unnecessarily upon 12 A. Yes, si 12 the cause of this deposition. + +10 Q. And did you>JpQrove mplaint prior to its 10 their physical comfort, I will object to breaks 11 filing? 11 occurring at less than one-how intervals during + +13 Q. i i - to say what this sentence 13 VIDEOGRAPHER: We' re now off video record. I. + +14 says," si 4I ••t homing enterprise endeavored 14 is 11:34 a.m. 15 to rdworking and honest lawyers and 15 (Brief recess.) 16 their cli who were adversely affected by the 16 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video + +17 miscondu that is the subject of this Complaint?" 17 record. It is I I :45 a.m. and we are on media + +18 MR. PIKE: Okay. I'm going to move to strike. 18 number two. 19 Mischaracterizes the language of the document. 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +20 The document reads as follows, for purposes of 20 Q. What knowledge do you have of Brad 21 the record: "The Rothstein racketeering enterprise 21 ever having personally engaged in mail fraud? 22 endeavored to compromise the core values of both 22 A. It's been widely reported in the press — 23 State and Federal justice systems in South Florida 23 Q. I'm going to withdraw my question. 24 and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers 24 What personal knowledge do you have of 25 and their clients who were adversely affected by 25 ever having been engaged in any mail fraud? + +1 A. Will you describe what you mean by "personal 1 can answer it without violating attorney/client and 2 knowledge," sir? 2 work product, you can answer the question. 3 Q. I mean direct observation through your senses 3 THE WITNESS: I'm afraid it will be 4 on your part. 4 attorney/client privilege, sir. 5 A. So arc you asking me whether or not I've 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 Q. I'm asking whether you have ever personally 8 in any effort to market any kind of investment in 9 witnessed ever having engaged in mail 9 anything? 10 fraud. 10 A. I would have to claim attorney/client 11 A. I'm not sure how thats possible for anybody 11 privilege on that. sir. 12 to witness a mail fraud, so would you inform me how it's 12 MR. PIKE: Form. 13 done? 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 Q. So the answer to my question is, you don't 14 Q. Do you have knowl c o a vidence 15 know; is that correct? 15 whatsoever that Mr. as ever a participant in 16 A. My answer to your question is — 16 devising a plan thro rc sold purported 17 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizcs the 17 confidential asst nts o Cured payout 18 witnese testimony. 18 settlement? 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 that Mr. crafted -- would you repeat the 21 Q. Have you ever personally witnessed 21 qu on , again, sir? I'm sorry. 22 engaging in mail fraud? 22 4. Yes r. I want to know whether you have any 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 purported confidential assignments of a structured + +6 witnessed him sending something directly, putting 6 Q. Do you have any evidence — knowledge of any 7 physically in the mail, sir? 7 evidence whatsoever that Mr. ever participated 19 THE WITNESS: I've asked for a clarification. 19 A. The and blogs have widely reported 23 MR. PIKE: Form. 23 k of evidence that personal I:. 24 THE WITNESS: No, sir. 24 r rticipated in devising a plan through which were + +777 + +2 Q. Have you ever personally witnessed Edward — engaged in wire fraud? S engaging in wire fraud, unless they we i t g 5 his firm was engaged in fraudulent structured 7 unfortunately, I would have to say, no, 7 investors. 8 Q. Have you ever perso witnessed 8 With respect to my personal knowledge. I'm 10 MR. PIKE: Fo 10 to at some point being able to disclose it, today 11 THE WITH gain, sir, the U.S. Attorney's 11 I'm going to have to assert the attorney/client 12 Complaint oth n firm alleges money 12 privilege. 13 launderin wire ud, mail fraud, RICO claims of 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 14 Mr. ers and his firm, calling the 14 Q. Your Complaint alleges that Rothstein and 16 Flori history, accused of fabricating malicious 16 Who are the others referred to in the 17 cases, si , of a sexually charged nature in order 17 Complaint? 19 millions of dollars. 19 Complaint, from Mr. Scherer's Complaint, it is the 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 partners and people who held themselves out to be 21 Q. And I'm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, 21 partners of the Roth — Scott Rothstein, including 23 Mr. ever personally participated in any of that 23 associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane 24 wrongdoing? 24 if that's how you pronounce her name, 25 MR. PIKE: To that question, to the extent you 25 Adler. and many of the other partners of his firm + +payout settlement? MR. PIKE: Form. 3 A. How would one — Pm not sure how 3 THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer that question 4 personal — have personal knowledge, wit 4 by saying that the newspapers have reported that 6 over their computer looking at their acco s. So. 6 settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida 9 engaged in money la 9 unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward 15 ft st criminal enterprise in South 15 others in RRA were using RRA to market investments. 18 to fleece unsuspecting South Floridians out of 18 A. From my understanding of the U.S. Attorney's 22 whether you have any evidence whatsoever that 22 Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. and other people + +1 currently under investigation by either the Florida Bar 1 advice of Counsel rm going to have to assert my Fifth, 2 or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, sir. 2 Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +3 Q. Which — which source of information 3 Q. Okay. Well, rm not limiting my question to + +4 referenced in that answer specifically made reference to 4 the three cases referenced in your Complaint. I want to + +5 Mr. 5 know whether you contend that any claim against you has + +6 A. I don't recall, sir. 6 been fabricated? + +7 Q. But you do have a recollection that one or 7 MR. PIKE: Form. Overbroad and confusing and + +8 more of them did; is that correct? 8 it's compound. + +9 A. I don't recall, sir. 9 THE WITNESS: The question makes no sense to + +10 Q. So you want to withdraw the earlier response 10 me. rm sure you could do better. + +11 that you made and your real answer is, I don't know; is 11 BY MR. SCAROLA: 12 that correct? 12 Q. Is there any pending claim inst you which + +13 MR. PIKE: Mischaracterizes the witness 13 you contend is fabricated? + +14 testimony. Move to strike. 14 A. At least today, sir, I mg c to + +15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 15 respond by asserting my Fl th and 14th Amendment 17 A. My answer stays the same, sir. 17 MR. PIKE: Fe. + +16 Q. Your response, sir? 16 Right. + +18 Q. Is it your contention that one or more + +19 lawsuits was fabricated against you? + +18 BY MR. SCyA ortA + +19 Q. Is it contention that was + +20 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers -- 20 ever personally involved in manufacturing false and/or + +21 Q. That's not my question. 21 fraudulent Court Opinions or Orders? + +22 A. Excuse me. I was answering. 22 A. Attorney/client privilege. + +23 MR. PIKE: Please let the witness answer the 23 Q. Your Complaint makes reference to someone 24 question, Mr. Scarola. 24 s 'Jig through a potential defendant's garbage looking + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: r damaging evidence to use with investors to show him + +Q. No, you're not answering my question. + +' 14)1 3 don't know whether he's answering your 3 Mr. Scarola, what page? 4 not. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Page 8, paragraph 19. + +potential defendants could be, in essence, blackmailed. + +2 MR. PIKE: He's only said three words, so 2 MR. PIKE: Would you identify for me, + +5 MR. SCAROLA: I didn't ask ut 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 newspapers. I asked him about If nteni I 6 Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage + +7 don't know he's not answering my 7 looking for damaging evidence? + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 MR. PIKE: One second. + +9 Q. But you can go ahead, cin, and you can 9 In light of clarity, Mr. Scarola, would you + +10 make your silly s no 10 please read the entire paragraph so Mr. Epstein + +11 MR. PIKE: ing to move to strike. 11 understands the tenor of the paragraph? + +12 THE want to repeat the question? 12 MR. SCAROLA: No. I want to know whether + +13 BY MR. SC 13 anyone ever sifted through Mr. garbage -- + +14 Q. Y Id like to know whether it is 14 through Mr. Epstein's garbage. That's the pending + +15 your that one or more lawsuits have been 15 question. + +16 fabrics inst you. 16 MR. PIKE: To the extent you understand the + +17 A. My ontention, sir, is that the firm of 17 question, you can answer. + +18 partners, Scott Rothstein, fabricated many 18 THE WITNESS: I think the question is poorly + +19 cases, reported by the press and the U.S. Attorney, 19 phrased. Did anyone ever sift through my garbage? + +20 amongst people like me and others of a sexually charged 20 What does that mean? + +21 nature in order to fleece investors of South Florida out 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +22 of millions of dollars. 22 Q. You don't know what sifting through garbage + +23 Do I have a — with respect to my individual 23 means? + +24 cases that Mr. has filed in these three cases, 24 A. Does that mean the garbage man? Does that + +25 rm unfortunately today, and only today at least, on 25 include the garbage man? I'm sure he sifted through my + +1 garbage. 1 THE WITNESS: Again, I'll respectfully answer 2 Q. Which garbage man sifted through your garbage? 2 the question by asserting my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 3 A. I'm sure people who go through garbage sift 3 Amendment Right. 4 through the garbage. I have no idea. 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Q. Did anyone ever sift through your garbage 5 Q. Your Complaint in paragraph 21, page 9, says 6 looking for damaging evidence? 6 that: "Upon information and belief, Rothstein, David 10 blackmail them. 10 false statements were made about the number of 11 Q. Yes. But I didn't ask you what some newspaper 11 cases/clients that existed or RRA had against Epstein 12 is alleged to have reported. 12 and the value thereof." 13 What I did ask you is whether anyone ever 13 Do you have any know) Mr. 14 sifted through your garbage looking for damaging 14 ever knew about such meetingeoking ucted? 15 evidence. 15 MR. PIKE: Form. 16 And the answer to that question, I think, can 16 To the extent you understand the question and 17 be either yes, no, or I don't know. 17 it will not violate any attorney/client or work 18 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 18 product prix liege infornudion, you can answer that 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 question. 20 Q. Or you could refuse to answer it on the 20 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, it has become evident 21 grounds that it may tend to incriminate you. 21 that speaking instruction to your witness is 22 A. I think you might - 22 tniction for him to assert an attorney/client 23 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 23 lege, regardless of whether it is or is not 24 THE WITNESS: I would like to answer my Own 24 and 1 object to it. 25 questions. If you'd like to answer all my MR. PIKE: Let me make the record clear. + +7 A. It's been widely reported in the newspapers, 7 Boden, Debbie Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten 8 sir, that the Rothstein fine engaged in sifting through 8 and Kenneth Jenne, all employees of RRA, through brokers 9 many people's garbage in order — in an attempt to 9 or middle men would stage regular meetings dining which + +1 questions, Mr. Scarola, I'm more than happy to sit You've been interchanging knowledge with personal 2 here and answer them. Would you like to • . • C knowledge. And many of the objections to which I 4 Q. Yes. I'd like to know what the an t, 4 privilege are based upon your malphrased question 17 with — with your questions and your claims 17 MR. SCAROLA: I am saying you're coaching the + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 ant asserting an attorney/client and work product S question is. Did anyone ever sift thro at age 5 and use of personal knowledge and knowledge 6 looking for damaging evidence? 6 interchangeably with those questions. 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 So if you want to rephrase your question to B THE WITNESS: I do w. 8 attempt to elicit a response — let me finish — 9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 then I have no objection to that. However, I'm not 10 Q. Did you ever dama 'ng evidence in your 10 going to sit here and allow my client to waive 11 garbage? 11 attorney/client and work product. 12 A. What's • 1 ing •dente, sir? 12 Now, to the extent you're saying I'm coaching 13 Q. Evin • • - t , g to implicate you in criminal 13 the witness, T object to that because I am 14 conduct. 14 certainly not. The witness is here to answer your 15 • Form. 15 questions and I believe has been answering your 16 WITNESS: At least today, Mr. Scarola, 16 questions today to the best of his ability. 18 and your defense of Mr. and his firm, the 18 witness. 19 Rothstein firm, while his partner sits in jail, 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 20 Q. Could you answer the question? 21 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. 21 MR. PIKE: Same objection. 22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 THE WITNESS: You'll have to repeat it. 23 Q. Did you ever have any evidence in your garbage 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 that would subject you to blackmail? 24 Q. Do you have any information indicating that 25 MR. PIKE: Form. Same — same objection. 25 ever had any knowledge of anyone + +1 associated with the Rothstein firm holding meetings +2 during which, quote, "false statements were made about +3 the number of cases/clients that existed or RRA had +4 against Epstein and the value thereof," unquote? + +5 MR. PIKE: Form. Same objection. + +6 THE WITNESS: My best recollection is the U.S. +7 Attorney has accused the Rothstein firm of just +8 those types of meetings where the partners got +9 together, schemed to defraud local investors of +10 millions of dollars by fabricating cases of a +11 sexually charged nature. And whether Mr. [REDACTED] +12 personally participated, I'm going to at least +13 today, sir, have to assert the attorney/client +14 privilege, but look forward to one day disclosing +15 it. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike all unresponsive +17 portions of the answer. + +18 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +19 Q. Paragraph 23 of your Complaint says that: +20 "RRA, Rothstein and [REDACTED], claiming the need for +21 anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, +22 they were able to effectively use initials," et cetera. + +23 Do you have any knowledge that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +24 fabricated a client to bring a claim against you? + +25 MR. PIKE: Form. + +1 THE WITNESS: I believe Mr. Scherer's +2 Complaint -- + +3 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +4 Q. I'm not asking about Mr. Scherer's Complaint. +5 I'm asking about any evidence that you have. + +6 MR. PIKE: The witness is basically been five +7 words into his sentence and you're not allowing him +8 to finish, once again. + +9 So if you recall the question, then please +10 respond. + +11 THE WITNESS: Please repeat it back, please? + +12 MR. PIKE: Madame Court Reporter, if you +13 would. + +14 (Pending question was read.) + +15 MR. PIKE: Form. + +16 THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer and +17 his claim against the Rothstein firm for a massive +18 fraud, as well as Mr. Sakowitz's claims to -- at +19 least in the -- described in the public press, +20 because he went to the FBI, for fabricating cases +21 that included initials. + +22 With respect to anything specific with +23 Mr. [REDACTED], I'm going to have to claim the +24 attorney/client privilege today, sir. + +25 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +1 Q. Do you have any -- do you have knowledge of +2 the existence of any evidence that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] knew +3 that Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi +4 scheme? + +5 MR. PIKE: Form. + +6 THE WITNESS: That's attorney/client +7 privilege. + +8 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +9 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence that +10 would indicate [REDACTED] [REDACTED] should have known that +11 Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for a Ponzi +12 scheme? + +13 MR. PIKE: Form. + +14 THE WITNESS: At least today -- + +15 MR. PIKE: Wait. + +16 THE WITNESS: Sorry. + +17 MR. PIKE: Form. Same objections. Same +18 attorney/client, work product as to the last +19 question. Same objections here, attorney/client +20 work product. + +21 THE WITNESS: And today I'm going to have to +22 assert the attorney/client privilege. + +23 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that +24 question -- + +25 THE WITNESS: I understand. + +1 MR. PIKE: -- then, please, -- + +2 THE WITNESS: Yes. + +3 MR. PIKE: -- answer Mr. Scarola's question. + +4 THE WITNESS: Separate from -- + +5 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching the +6 witness. + +7 THE WITNESS: Separate from the communication +8 I've had with my attorneys, I can't answer that +9 question. + +10 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, I'm confused. I +11 started objecting to form in the beginning of this +12 deposition. You then instructed me, which is +13 against the rules, Mr. Pike, I don't know what's +14 wrong with the form. I object to you objecting to +15 form. + +16 Then I assert the attorney/client, work +17 product, and now you're telling me I'm coaching the +18 witness. + +19 So tell me, Mr. Scarola, what is the -- what +20 is the way that you would like me to object in this +21 deposition, and maybe I can conform that way for +22 you, which may or may not be consistent with the +23 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Pike, -- + +25 MR. PIKE: Yes, sir. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: - if you don't know the 2 difference between a form objection and a privilege 3 objection — 4 MR. PIKE: Right. 5 MR. SCAROLA: — then this deposition is not 6 the proper context in which for you to learn the 7 difference between a form objection and a privilege 8 action. 9 MR. PIKE: I'm pretty clear on what a form 10 objection is and what a privilege objection is and 11 I'm pretty knowledgeable on that. The problem — 12 MR. SCAROLA: Then we don't need to engage in 13 any further discussion. 14 MR. PIKE: — I want to try to make the record 15 clear, because initially you didn't want me to 16 object to form. You wanted me to speak. So I'm 17 thinking you're conceding to that point. 18 What my question is, is: What's wrong with my 19 objecting to attorney/client, work product? So I 20 guess I'm asking you what you were asking me 21 earlier on. What's wrong with the form? 22 We can just move forward. 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 , Q. In your C taint you identify the RRA law 25 firm Rothstein and as the, quote, "litigation + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 team," unquote. You then go on to say in paragraph 31 of Complaint at page 12 that: "Rothstein and litigation team" — MR. PIKE: Wait a minute. Put that do PJ a second. Hold on. THE WITNESS: You can read it. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. "Individually and in a d effort may have unethically and jltgally gad in certain specified conduct May we that you don' quote, "li in ly lude from that statement knowledge as to whether the, " including Mr. engaged and illegal conduct? PIKE: For now, while I'm reviewing the documclit itself, I'm just going to just tell you to hold off — THE WITNESS: Sure. MR. PIKE: — on answering that question. You may want to go off the record, so we don't have a lag in — MR. SCAROLA: No, I'd like it on the record. Thank you. MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, did you bring an extra + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 copy of the Complaint that you're questioning Mr. Epstein on for Mr. Epstein to look at? MR. SCAROLA: No. MR. PIKE: Okay. I'm going to have to go get him a copy so he can — the paragraphs of this Complaint are very long and the Complaint itself is in excess of — it was approximately 35 pages, MR. SCAROLA: I'll withdraw the question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you have any evidence that Brad sold, allowed to be sold and/or assist/1 with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? MR. PIKE: Form. j , THE WITNESS: lltamespapers have widely reported that the Rothstein firm engaged in illegal structured settlements of cases of a sexual nature, including specifically, me. We have subpoenaed the documents tom Mr, and his finn and we ha' e not been able to get them as of yet. A cam confident that once we 4%1 will be able -to answer your questions with more specificity. mg. SCAROLA: you sit here today, do you have any ence whatsoever to support an assertion that + +2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M, individually and personally, sold, allowed to be sold and/or assisted with the sale of an interest in non-settled personal injury lawsuits? MR. PIKE: Before you answer that question, Madame Court Reporter, will you please read that question back to me? (Pending question was read.) MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that question without divulging attorney/client or work product information, you may answer that question. MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. THE WITNESS: You said, allowed to be sold. I'm going to assert attorney/client privilege to the answer, Pm afraid, but I'd like to answer that question. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence indicating that ever reached agreement. to share attorney's fees with non-lawyers? MR. PIKE: I'm sorry. Mr. Scarola, can you tell me what page of the Complaint you're referring to, if you arc? MR. SCAROLA: I'm not referring to any page of the Complaint, although I will tell you that that precise allegation is made in the Complaint. + +1 THE WITNESS: In fact, Mr. Scarola, we have +2 subpoenaed Mr. [REDACTED] documents and documents +3 from his firm that I believe will, in fact, give me +4 more specificity with the answers to that question. + +5 I'm looking forward to getting the -- that +6 specific evidence. With respect to what we +7 currently know, sitting here today, I'm +8 unfortunately going to have to claim my +9 attorney/client privilege. + +10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +11 Q. Do you today have any evidence to support an +12 assertion that [REDACTED] ever used investor money +13 to pay L.M., E.W., and/or Jane Doe up-front money, such +14 that they would refuse to settle civil actions? + +15 MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +16 THE WITNESS: You'll have to get -- I need to +17 hear the first part of the question. Do I have any +18 evidence? Do I have knowledge of evidence? I'm +19 sorry. What was the -- + +20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence to +22 support that assertion? + +23 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer that +24 question without violating attorney/client, work +25 product, please do so. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Objection. Coaching. +2 THE WITNESS: I'm going to have to assert the +3 attorney/client privilege, I'm afraid, though I'd +4 like to answer that question as well, sir. + +5 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +6 Q. Do you have any evidence to support the +7 assertion that [REDACTED] conducted searches, wire +8 taps or intercepted conversations in violation of State +9 or Federal laws and Bar rules? + +10 A. Your question, once again, asked did Mr. -- +11 was Mr. [REDACTED] personally involved in the +12 eavesdropping? Did he walk to someone's house and sort +13 of put a bug in their house? Did he, personally, stand +14 outside? + +15 The question is, did Mr. [REDACTED] firm engage +16 in this behavior in an attempt to defraud local +17 investors out of millions of dollars? The U.S. attorney +18 has filed a Complaint saying that they did. The +19 Complaints filed by Scherer saying that his firm did. + +20 The Scherer Complaint says my name and the +21 boxes of files that we've subpoenaed used my name, sir. + +22 We have requested information, but up until +23 today have not received any. + +24 To give you a more specific answer, I'm afraid +25 I cannot. + +1 Q. Do you have knowledge of any evidence that +2 [REDACTED] ever conducted searches, wire taps or +3 intercepted conversations in violation of State or +4 Federal laws and Bar rules? + +5 MR. PIKE: Same instruction. + +6 THE WITNESS: The newspapers and the U.S. +7 Attorney's Complaint widely reported that +8 Mr. [REDACTED] firm and people hired by his firm, +9 investigators hired by his firm fraudulently +10 representing themselves as FBI agents engaged in +11 just those activities, sir. + +12 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +13 Q. Do you have any knowledge of any evidence that +14 [REDACTED] was ever aware of any such activities? + +15 A. I'm going to have to -- + +16 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +17 THE WITNESS: -- assert the attorney/client +18 privilege to that, sir. + +19 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +20 Q. Do you have any knowledge that [REDACTED] +21 ever participated in or was aware of actions that +22 utilized the judicial process, including, but not +23 limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for +24 the sole purpose of furthering a Ponzi scheme? + +25 MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +1 To the extent you can answer the question +2 without disclosing attorney/client or work product +3 information, do so. + +4 THE WITNESS: The pleadings of Mr. Scherer +5 with respect to the largest Ponzi scheme in South +6 Florida's history engaged in by Mr. [REDACTED] firm +7 and Scott Rothstein, who currently sits in jail, +8 probably for the rest of his life for engaging in, +9 not only illegal wire taps and eavesdropping, but +10 an abuse of the entire legal system, I believe +11 speaks for itself. + +12 Unfortunately, with respect to Mr. [REDACTED] +13 today, I'm going to have to assert the +14 attorney/client, work privilege, sir. + +15 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +16 Q. Is it your contention that Mr. Scherer's +17 Complaint even contains the name [REDACTED]? + +18 A. I don't recall, sir. + +19 Q. Did sexual assaults ever take place on a +20 private airplane on which you were a passenger? + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +22 THE WITNESS: At least -- I would like to +23 answer each and every one of your questions here +24 today, Mr. Scarola. But at least today, I'm going +25 do have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +Amendment Rights as provided by the U.S. 1 about. The one in which your deposition is being taken 6 International figures? 6 misbehavior on Mr. part, and the Complaint was + +2 Constitution. 2 today. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 Do you know who brought those persons' names 4 Q. Does a flight log kept for a private jet used 4 into this lawsuit? 5 by you contain the names of celebrities, dignitaries or 5 A. As a reaction, and only as a reaction to total 7 A. At least today, sir, I'm going to have to 7 obviously written by my attorneys, sir. 8 respectfully decline to answer based on my Fifth, Sixth 8 Q. So you know that those names are in your 9 and 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer that 9 Complaint, right? 10 question. 10 A. Yes, sir. 11 Q. Have you ever had a personal relationship with 11 Q. Okay. So because those names are in your 12 Donald Trump? 12 Complaint, I'm asking you about ple you named. 13 A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," 13 Have you had a social relation ip with Tommy 14 sir? 14 Mottola? 15 Q. Have you socialized with him? 15 A. The names in my C'npla int are strictly as a 16 A. Yes, sir. 16 reaction to the abusive-discovery process by 17 Q. Yes? 17 Mr. MI, his inters. Scott Rothstein, who sits in 18 A. Yes, sir. 18 jail, in an att t t imperil my friendships. 19 Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in 19 But, y have ialized with Mr. Mottola. 20 the presence of females under the age of 18? 20 Q. ye socialized with Mr. Mottola in 21 A. Though rd like to answer that question, at 21 the f females under the age of I8? 22 least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 22 . Form. 23 and 14th Amendment Right, sir. 23 WITNESS: At least today, the typical to 24 Q. Have you socialized with Alan Dershowitz? 24 contention of bringing eases of a 25 A. Yes, sir. He's my attorney, as well as a licious nature where his partner sits in jail for + +1 friend. 2 Q. Have you ever socialized with Alan De 2 today, at least, I nittst assert my Fifth, Sixth and 3 in the presence of females under the age of 3 14th Amendment Right, though I'd like to answer 5 THE WITNESS: Sir, at least hp tod 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth 6 Q. Have you had a social relationship with David 7 Amendment and 14th Amendment Rights. 7 Copperfield? B BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 A. As a reaction to. once again, the abusive 9 Q. Have you ever socialiNKTommy Mottola? 9 discovery process of bringing in names of pco le that 10 A. This is the type of questions where people who 10 have absolutely nothing to do with any of Mr. . 11 have nothing to dowith this case whatsoever have been 11 Mr. Rothstein's or their clients' claims, by bringing in 12 brought into by Mr in an attempt to 12 the names of friends of mine strictly in an attempt to 13 simply' my tionships with social friends and 13 stress my relationships, imperil my business 14 serves f why this case has been brought 14 relationships, I'm going to say, yes, I do know 15 agai and his firm, sir. 15 Mr. Copperfield. 16 PIKE: Form as well. 16 Q. Have you ever socialized with David 17 BY MR. AROLA: 17 Copperfteld? 18 Q. Well, do you know who brought those persons' 18 A. Again, as — 19 names into this lawsuit? 19 MR. PIECE: Form. 20 MR. PIKE: Form. 20 THE WITNESS: Sorry. 21 And just to be clear, what Mr. Scarola, I 21 It's a typical Rothstein strategy of 22 believe, talking about this lawsuit, Epstein versus 22 trying to involve well-known people in maliciously 23 RRA? 23 fabricated cases in order to fleece investors out 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 of millions of dollars. They brought up names in 25 Q. Yes, sir, that's the lawsuit I'm talking 25 attempts at abuse of discovery process to try and + +this — just this type of behavior, the answer is, 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 each and every one of your questions, Mr. Scarola. + +1 take discovery of people who have nothing to do 1 THE WITNESS: In response to your question, 2 with this case. 2 again, my fi/11 answer was, typical of the 3 Did I socialize with David Copperfteld? The 3 'Rothstein scheme to ask questions of a 4 answer is, yes. 4 sexual charged nature, crafted cases, the U.S. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 Attorney has called his rum the largest fraud in 6 Q. Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield 6 U.S. history, fleecing investors out of millions of 7 in the presence of females under the age of 187 7 dollars by engaging in just these types of 8 A. Pm sure, again, this question is a typical 8 questions. Though I would like to answer each and 9 question of Mr. iRothstein scheme to defraud 9 every question about every one of these people, on 10 investors, asking questions knowing it serves no purpose 10 advice of my Counsel today, I must take — assert 11 or relationship relevance to their case whatsoever. 11 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th 12 At least today, though Pd like to answer that 12 Amendment Right. Though I'd fer to answer the 13 question, on advice of my Counsel, and only on advice of 13 question, I was told that if I chop. to do so, I 14 my Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 14 risk losing their representation. sir. 15 and 14th Amendment Right. 15 BY MR. SCAROLA: 16 17 MR. PIKE: Form as well. BY MR. SCAROLA: 18 Q. Have you ever had a social relationship with 18 THE : On ad% ice of Counsel, and only 19 Bill Governor of New Mexico and formerly 19 upon advie of Counsel, though I'd like to answer 20 U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United 20 that question, as well as every other one of your 21 Nations? 21 claims brought by Mr. and his partner, who 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 - currently sits in jail, sir, I would like to answer 23 THE WITNESS: As is typical of the 23 them: questions. But today at least, I have to 25 who sits in jail, what they attempted to do was Amendment Right. Though I'd prefer to answer the + +16 17 Q. Have you ev;sexually abused children? MR. PIKE: F n 24 scheme, along with his partner, Scott Roth.:tein. 24 \assert my Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth TTT + +Page 9 Page 9 6 s >, e question, I'm told by my Counsel that if I choose 5 their claims or cases. 5 Q. How many children have you sexually abused? of 18? 9 harassing. And, moreover, it's my contention that 21 Q. Yes, but that wasn't my question. 21 MR. SCAROLA: Well, it's very interesting that + +1 bring in any celebrity I might have known, 2 well-known people, in an attempt to strictly 2 to do so, which is my preference, I risk losing 3 imperil my relationships with these peopl 3 their representation. 4 these people have no bearing whatsoev o 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Yes, I do have a social relatio p. 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 And I just want to be clear on the record. 8 Q. Have you ever sociali th Mr. 8 These typesof questions are argumentative and 9 in the presence of females 10 MR. PIKE: F 10 these types of questions arc not related to this 11 THE gain, typical of the 11 lawsuit by any stretch of the imagination. In this 12 sc of bringing in well-known 12 deposition, while I've been liberal in allowing 13 people, ng ridiculous questions, 13 these questions, am being utilized in an attempt 14 ridicu in an attempt strictly to 14 to provoke a waiver of the Fifth Amendment Right. 15 lationships with these people where 15 There has been an Order entered by, I believe. 16 they e absolutely nothing to do with anything to 16 Judge Hafele regarding that types of questions. 17 do with , Rothstein or any of their alleged 17 So with that caution, Mr. Scarola, I would ask 18 victims, the answer to your question is, yes, I 18 you that you refrain from asking abusive and 19 have socialized. 19 harassing questions that are not relevant to this 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: 20 case. 22 My question was: Have you ever socialized 22 you claim they're not relevant when they are 23 with Mr. Richards in the presence of females under the 23 directly taken from the allegations in your 24 age of 18? 24 Complaint. 25 MR. PIKE: Form. 2.5 And I agree with you that they are not + +relevant because there is no basis whatsoever for 2 this claim against Mr. But since you've 2 MR. PIKE: Okay. Do you have an objection to 3 made these baseless allegations, I am obliged to 3 us taking a quick bathroom break and - 4 pursue the allegations by asking these questions. 4 TIIE WITNESS: P11 just walk out and back in. + +MR. SCAROLA: Uh-huh. + +5 So we'll move on from there. And whenever you 5 MR. SCAROLA: If Mr. Epstein needs to go to 6 think it's appropriate to terminate this deposition 6 the bathroom Mr. Epstein needs to go to the 7 because you believe that I've acted 7 bathroom. 8 inappropriately, be my guest. e TILE WITNESS: Thank you, sir. + +9 MR. PIKE: I appreciate your invitation. 9 MR. PIKE: Then we're off the record? 10 Mr. Scarola. 10 VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off the record. + +11 I'm going to move to strike. 11 (Brief recess.) + +12 The fact is, Mr. Scarola, is that, these types 12 VIDEOGRAPHER: We are k on video record at + +13 of questions have already been ruled upon as being 13 12:43 p.m. 14 argumentative and harassing. 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +15 If you want to direct some questions relevant 15 Q. I think when we record you had 16 to your lawsuit, l invite you to do so. But 16 requested that the las u gave and the 18 mechanism to provoke a waiver of the Fifth 18 so well start • + +17 attempting to use this deposition process as a 17 question asked of at answer be read back, + +19 Amendment and to obtain information that is more or 19 MR. PI : e Court Reporter. 20 potentially more relevant to Mr. cases in 20 us on and answer were read.) + +21 which he is lead Counsel on, I think is improper. 21 I 'MESS: Sounds like a complete answer to + +22 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 + +23 Q. Did you have staff members that assisted you 23 OLA: 24 in scheduling appointments with underage females; that 24 •. sir. My question to you following that + +, 5 is, females under the age of 18? was: Who are the others to whom you made + +2 A. So along with many of the other claims that the Rothstein finn crafted with malicious claims 2 3 people like me and others of a sexually cbarg 3 A. Can you repeat where it says me and others? 4 in order to simply fleece investors out of - 4 Pm sorry. 5 dollars in South Florida, these types o 5 MR. SCAROLA: Read it back again, please. 6 though Pd like to answer today, at lea c 6 Sandy. 7 question, I'm going to have to assert, rely, my 7 (Answer was read.) 8 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amend Right, though I'd prefer 8 THE WITNESS: The others are people reported + +reference in that response? You said, "me and others." Who are the others? + +9 to answer the question. 9 in the press to be many people in South Florida who o BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 were the victims of the Rothstein scam. + +1 Q. Who are referred to in that 11 I'm glad — I'm happy to answer the others. + +2 response? 12 Pd like to know the others. In fact, we've 3 A. Again; sir? 13 subpoenaed documents from the bankruptcy trustee o' + +1 4 Q. You said you d others. Who arc the others 14 Brad firm in an attempt to find out more + +5 that erring to? 15 details of the others that you've just asked about. + +. 6 A. 'II have to read my answer back. 16 People — I believe the Attorney Scherer has + +. r MR. IKE: I'm sorry. Madame Court Reporter, 17 filed a Complaint for some of the others who have 8 would you please read the witness' answer back? 18 been defrauded, as well as some of the investors + +19 THE WITNESS: You'll have to -- I have to take 19 who were told about many others, sir. 20 a bathroom break. 20 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +21 MR. PIKE: Actually I don't — one second. 21 Q. So you don't know any names; is that correct? + +22 For the record, we're going on 12:30 now. Is 22 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. 23 there — do you have a time frame as to when you -- 23 Mischaracterizes the witness' testimony. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: About a half hour. 24 THE WITNESS: Pm sure that's an -- it's an + +25 MR. PIKE: You have a half hour left? 25 easy way of saying that as a response to the + +1 questions and subpoenas we've asked Mr. to 1 Amendment Right. 2 produce so we can find out the specific names of 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 the others who have been — the U.S. Attorney has 3 Q. Who are the minors who you solicited for 4 claimed have been blackmailed and victims of the 4 prostitution? 5 Rothstein firm. 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 6 I'd be happy, and hopefully at the end of this 6 711E WITNESS: Who are the — I pled guilty to 7 trial everyone will know some of the names of the 7 soliciting prostitution. There was no soliciting Et others, sir. 8 minors charge, sir. + +9 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 MR. SCAROLA: Could you read back the response + +10 Q. Do you know the names of any of the others? 10 to the question about what Mr. Epstein pled guilty 11 A. No, sir, If do not. However, the U.S. 11 to, please? 12 Attorney, we believe, is going to file more charges 1.2 MR. PIKE: About four q back. 13 against Mr. Roth — Mr. partners. And 13 (Previous question and read.) 14 Mr. Scherer and us have subpoenaed the bankruptcy 14 MR. PIKE: And his 15 trustee for the names of the others. 15 MR. SCAROLA: his answer. + +16 So sitting here today, I do not. Hopefully 16 BY MR. SCAROLA:/ 17 sometime before trial we will have names of the others. 17 Q. Who are the u procured for 18 sir. 18 prostitution? + +19 Q. Have you ever pled guilty to any criminal 19 MR. P F + +20 wrongdoing? 20 TI WI I believe if you — my answer 21 A. Yes, sir. 21 t , . • • g a minor, sir, not minors. + +22 Q. What criminal wrongdoing did you plead guilty 22 , I' OLA: + +23 to? 23 ' i • is the minor that you procured for + +24 A. A solicitation of prostitution and procuring a 24 on? 25 minor for prostitution, sir. I do not know. + +1 Q. On how Tinny occasions did you solicit MR. PIKE: Form. And relevance. 2 prostitution? BY MR. SCAROLA: + +3 A. Undcr — excuse mc? Again? 3 Q. How many minors have you procured for + +4 Q. On how many occasions did you so 4 prostitution? + +5 prostitution? 5 MR. PIKE: Fonn. + +6 A. At least sitting here today, I'm ing to 6 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, sir, I'm 7 to, on advice of Counsel, assert my Fi 7 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +8 16th Amendment (sic) and Fo sic) Amendment Right. 8 Amendment Right, though I pled guilty to procuring + +9 Q. On how many occasion plead guilty to 9 a single minor. 0 soliciting prostitution 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +:1 A. Once, sir. 11 Q. Yes, but my question wasn't about what you :2 Q. How o icitation of prostitution 12 pled guilty to. I just want to know how many minors yo:i + +13 did you plead t, ' 13 have procured for prostitution. + +:4 A. 14 MR. PIKE: Asked and answered. + +15 the names of the individuals who you 15 THE WITNESS: Again, al least with respect to :7 A. I do t know. 17 procuring a single minor. + +1 6 pled gui to soliciting as prostitutes? 16 what I've pled guilty to, I pled guilty to + +18 Q. When did those acts occur? 18 With respect to the rest of your question, I'm 19 A. I do not know. 19 going to have to asses my Fifth, Sixth and 14th + +20 Q. How many prostitutes have you solicited? 20 Amendment Rights as provided by my Counsel. + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: + +22 THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, at least 22 Q. When did you procure the minor for 23 sitting here today, sir, I'd like to answer each 23 prostitution as to which procurement you pled guilty? + +24 one of those questions. However, today fin going 24 MR. PIKE: Form. + +25 to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 25 THE WITNESS: I don't know. + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: 1 BY MR. SCAROLA: 2 Q. Was there a time before you entered your 2 Q. Paragraph 46(a), last sentence: "Under the 3 guilty plea when you knew the identity of the 3 circumstances, her claim for damages against Epstein. 4 prostitutes that you solicited? 4 one of L.M:s many Johns during that same period," et 5 MR. PIKE: Form. 5 cetera. 6 THE WITNESS: Again? 6 You have identified yourself in this Complaint 8 Q. Was there a time before the entry of your e a reference to a customer of a prostitute. 9 guilty plea when you knew the identity of the 9 I low many times were you one of L.M.'s 10 prostitutes you solicited? 10 customers for purposes of prostitution? 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 11 A. Well, now that you've now put on the record 12 THE WITNESS: I don't recall. 12 that L.M., I believe, in her depositio \$ an admitted 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 prostitute, I would like to answe t uestion. but on 14 Q. Was there a time before the entry of your 14 advice of Counsel, sir, I'm to ha 15 guilty plea when you knew the identity of thc minor that 15 respectfully decline. But I y to ear you 16 you pled guilty to procuring for prostitution? 16 finally admit it in udtions that your L.M. is 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 17 an admitted prostitu 18 THE WITNESS: I don't know. 18 MR. SC to strike. Unresponsive. 19 BY MR. SCAROLA: 19 BY MR. SCA LA: ' 20 Q. Did you plead guilty because you were, in 20 Q. lime you ever coerced, induced or enticed any 21 fact, guilty? 21 to engage in :my sexual act with you? 22 MR. PIKE: Form. 22 . PIKE: Form. 23 That's attomey/client, work product. 23 IE WITNESS: A typical question from 24 AttOntyklient. 24 la representing Mr. and the firm 25 MR. SCAROLA: I haven't asked anything about Rothstein, who Scott Rothstein sits in jail for + +7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 as one of L.M.'s many Johns, which you acknowledge to be + +1 any communication. crafting cases of a sexual nature against people in 2 MR. PIKE: It definitely could get into a 2 South Florida, me and others, the others yet to be 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. 8 you were, in fact, guilty. 8 Q. How many times have you engaged in fondling 11 Q. Do you the term John to be a slang 11 THE WITNESS: This is relevance here at sonic 24 MR. SCAROLA: Page 22. 24 believe are obvious to the ladies and gentlemen of + +3 communication with Mr. Epstein's lawy 3 determined. However, today, though I'd like to 4 time of the criminal proceeding. 4 answer every one of his questions, on advice of 5 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, it 5 Counsel, at least today, I'm going to have to 7 Q. I want to know whether you p ty because 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 A. I'm going to have to Fifth, Sixth 9 underage females? 10 and 14th A r. 10 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 reference to • i - a prostitute? 12 point? 13 MR. P' ' , 13 MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer the 14 N.I :•: Yes, sir. 14 question. 15 BY Al OLA: 15 THE WITNESS: Again, as another one of the 16 Q. many times were you one of L.M.'s 16 irrelevant questions asked of this lawsuit with 17 customers. 17 respect as a client how I was abused by the 18 MR. PIKE: Form. 18 Rothstein firm for his — the practices, the abuse 19 THE WITNESS: L.M.'s customers. 19 of the legal system, the — hopefully, the ladies 20 You'll have to rephrase the question, sir. 20 and gentlemen of the jury will be able to sec 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 21 through some of these ridiculous questions with 22 Q. Your Complaint says — 22 respect to questions that today, at least, I must 23 MR. PIKE: What page were you reading from? 23 take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, but I 25 MR. PIKE: Thank you. 25 the jury what you're trying to do here, + +1 Mr. Scarola. 1 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 2 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike. Unresponsive. 2 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. PIKE: No. That's fine. 3 Q. Do you have a personal sexual preference for 4 BY MR. SCAROLA: 4 children? 5 Q. How many times have you engaged in illegal 5 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. Abusive. 6 sexual touching of minors? 6 Harassing. Not reasonably calculated to lead to 7 MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. 7 the discovery of admissible evidence in this case. 8 THE WITNESS: Again, an irrelevant question to 8 THE WITNESS: Another rrelevant 9 this lawsuit, strictly as a continued attempt to 9 question to this lawsuit, Mr. behavior, in 10 bring in irrelevant facts to the fact of what the 10 an attempt to strictly divert attention from the 11 Rothstein firm has done to both me and others in 11 wrongdoing of the Rothstein firm in this matter by 12 South Florida, defrauding investors of millions of 12 asking sexually charged questions in a case where 13 dollars, knowing that at least today I'm going to 13 the Rothstein firm has been chary the U.S. 14 have to with respect to that particular question 14 Attorney of fabricating claims o Heim 15 assert my Fourth — excuse me — Fifth, Sixth and 15 nature, hiding behind attorney/client privilege, 16 14th Amendment Rights. 16 forging documents -- excuse me — but as with 17 MIL SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 17 respect to thew questions designed for nothing 18 MIL PIKE: Mr. Scarola, he's answering your 18 more than to harass me, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to 19 20 question. You're asking abusive and harassing questions that are unrelated to this lawsuit. 21 If you can direct me to anywhere in the 21 AROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 22 Complaint that even remotely addresses your two 22 OLA: 23 questions that you've just posed to Mr. Epstein, 23 e you ever acted on a sexual preference ibr 24 I'd be happy to look at the section in the 24 25 Complaint. But moving to strike the witness' MR. PIKE: Form. Irrelevant. Abusive. + +19 20 T., have to. union unatc I y, take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Anwndrnent. + +1 answer when he's answering your abusive and Harassing. And not reasonably calculated to lead 2 harassing questions is improper. 7 2 to admissible evidence in this case. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 THE WITNESS: One more of Mr. Scarola's 4 Q. How many times have you enga 4 irrelevant questions designed nothing more to try 5 with females under the age of 18? 5 to harass me, to divert attention from the fact 6 MR. PIKE: Objection. Ret we and 6 that Mr. and his (-um perpetrated one of 7 harassing. Not reasonably calcula cad to 7 the largest frauds in South Florida's history by 8 discovery of admissible ' in this case. 8 using people like me and others in an attempt to 9 THE WITNESS: A t estion posed by 9 fleece South Florida investors out of millions of 10 Mr. Scarola in an t to 'vert the attention 10 dollars, where the U.S. Attorney has accused his 11 away from the doing of his 13. firm of being the largest criminal eM iin 12 partner, •T ' ihst who sits in jail for 12 South Florida's history, where Mr. partner 13 defraudin •-.. i rs of South Florida of millions 13 sits in prison, potentially for the rest of his 14 of do , r ing malicious cases of a sexual 14 life. 15 order to fleece investors, called by 15 I'd like to answer all of your questions here 16 the Attorney one of the largest frauds in 16 today. Mr. Scarola, even though they're irrelevant; 17 South orida's history. 17 however, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm 18 Mr. Scarola, as l would like to respond to the 18 going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 19 questions regarding of your underage girls, the 19 Amendment Right. 20 fondling or the other questions you've asked me 20 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. 21 here today, unfortunately, I cannot on advice of 21 BY MR. SCAROLA: 22 Counsel answer those questions, so I must assert my 22 Q. Your Complaint at page 27, paragraph 49, says 23 Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights, though 23 that: "BRA and the litigation team took an emotionally 24 these questions arc totally irrelevant to this 24 driven set of facts involving alleged innocent, 25 lawsuit. 25 unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach + +billionaire, and sought to turn it into a gold mine," 1 the cases based on the merits, that is, facts which 2 end of quote. 2 included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions + +3 Who is the Palm Beach billionaire referred to 3 by each of the claimants." 4 in that sentence? 4 A. Yes. 5 A. On advice of Counsel today, Mr. Scarola, 5 Q. Who are the claimants that you're referencing 6 though I would like to answer each one of your 6 there? 7 questions, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth 7 A. They're the prostitutes you referred to in the 8 and 14th Amendment Right. 8 past, sir. 9 Q. What is the emotionally driven set of facts to 9 Q. What are their names? 10 which you make reference in that sentence? 10 A. I think the prostitutes' names were — the 11 A. It's the same set of facts that were used by 11 prostitute that you described before was L.M. 12 the Rothstein firm to fleece unsuspecting investors out 12 With respect to the others, I ping to have 13 of millions of dollars, crafting, fabricating malicious 13 to claim the Fifth, Sixth and l4t1tA dment, sir. 14 cases of a sexually charged nature with no fundamental 14 Q. So one of the indiviiltals that 're 15 basis whatsoever, reported wildly by the press. The 15 referencing there is L.M.; hTat correct? 16 U.S. Attorney has accused Mr. partner of not — 16 A. It's -- the indi dual I've referenced is a 17 excuse me — Mr. partner sits currently in 17 person who filed Qc im against me. 18 jail, pled guilty to some of these charges. There are 18 Q. Is it L 19 other members of his firm under investigation for just 19 A. It is L. , as as I know from the claim. 20 these types of questions and fabrications. 20 sir. 21 But, however, today, though I'd like to answer 21 • 0 ' . So one of the people that you're 22 every one of your questions with specificity, on advice 22 i - , • L.M., who you've identified as L.M.; is 23 of Counsel I'm not going to be able to, Mr. Scarola, and 23 .:' •i - 24 respectfully decline based on my Fifth, Sixth and 14th 24 th respect to that question, sir, on advice 25 Amendment Right. oaf. ounsel, Fm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth + +777 + +Page 11 Page 11' 7 attorney/client privilege, sir. 7 have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and lath Amendment Right. 13 litigation, of having my attorneys prepare + +1 Q. What day are you prepared to answer all these 1 and 14th Amendment. 2 questions? 2 Q. What are the voluntary and consensual actions 3 MR. PIKE: Form. Attorney/client and 3 by L.M. that you are referencing there? 4 product. 4 A. Sir, though I'd like to answer each one of 5 THE WITNESS: That's attorney 5 your questions here today, Fm going to have to 6 could answer that question as well, ut ifs f 6 respectfully decline based on advice of my Counsel, and 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 Q. What are the damages that you claim to have 9 Q. Your Complaint says er than 9 suffered as a consequence of any wrongdoing on the pan :0 evaluating and resole e aced on the merits," 10 of IIIIP II open parens, "i.e., close parens, "which 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 included kno - e, terry and consensual actions 12 THE WITNESS: The cost of ridiculous :3 by each of " et cetera. 'mans :4 that are referenced 14 responses to wildly irrelevant discovery in various :5 there 15 locations at a minimum, sir. 6 A. I I'm sorry. You have to repeat the 16 BY MR. SCAROLA: 17 question. 17 Q. Which lawyers? :8 Q. Yes, sir. Your Complaint says,: -- 18 A. Burman Critton, Jack Goldberger, and a bunch :9 MR. PIKE: Page? 19 of the others, sir. 20 Q. — "rather than evaluating" — 20 Q. Which ones? Name them forme, please. 21 MR. PIKE: Can you give me a page, sit? 21 A. Specifically — I have so many lawyers 22 MR. SCAROLA: Page 27, paragraph 49, second 22 defending me here against Mr. ME, I can't sit 23 sentence. 23 here — at the moment I can't recall it with 24 BY MR. SCAROLA: 24 specificity. 25 Q. Quote, "rather than evaluating and resolving 25 Q. You don't remember any of your lawyers' names' + +1 A. . Edo. 1 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? 2 Q. Besides Mr. — besides the Burman Critton firm 2 A. I believe so. 3 and Mr. Goldberger? 3 Q. What's the hourly rate? 4 A. Are you asking me for the firm, sir, or are 4 A. I don't blow, sir. 5 you asking me for the names? 5 Q. How much have you paid Alan Dershowitz? 6 Q. I want as much information as you can give me 6 A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. 7 about this clement of damage which you claim; and, that 7 Q. Arc you paying him on an hourly basis? 8 is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be 8 A. I believe so. 9 damages in this case. 9 Q. At what hourly rate? 10 A. Okay. 10 A. I don't know, sir. 12 THE WITNESS: Mr. Roy Black. 12 you paid Jay Lefkowitz? 13 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 A. I'm not sure, sir. /I, 14 Q. Okay. Who else? 14 Q. Do you have any idea at all? 15 A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. 15 A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. 16 Mr. Jay Lcfkowitz. The firm of Duman Critton Lutticr. 16 Q. Are you pay g him on an hourly basis? 17 That's it for the moment. 17 A. Yes, sir. 18 Q. How much have you paid the law firm of Burman 18 Q. What' tc? 19 Critton and Lutticr which you claim is damages? 19 A. I don 20 A. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, sir. 20 Q. t is nn of payment to your lawyers? 21 Q. How much? 21 H money to them? 22 A. I don't have that figure °Oland. 22 A. do }MOW, sir. 23 Q. Can you give us any better figure than 23 . PIKE: Form. 24 hundreds of thousands of dollars? 24 •. SCAROLA: 25 A. No, not sitting here today. s. Pardon me? + +11 MR. PIKE: Form. And move to strike. 11 Q. How much arc you paying Jay — how much have + +1 Q. Arc you paying them on an hourly basis? A. I don't know. 2 A. Yes, sir. 7 2 Q. Does someone do that on your behalf? 3 Q. What is the hourly rate at which yo 3 A. I would guess so. 4 compensating members of the law firm? 4 Q. Who? 5 A. They're ordinary rates. 5 A. I don't know. 6 Q. What are they? 6 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 A. I don't know. 7 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 A. I'm not aware total 9 payment on your behalf? 10 Q. What is the ly rate which you're paying 10 A. With respect to that question, I'm going to 12 A. His .. . our tc. 12 Q. Are there any other elements of damage, apart 1 3 Q. How , that? 13 from the money paid to lawyers? 1 4 A. I , i . 14 A. Ycs, sir. 15 eh have you paid Mr. Black which ,..).i 15 Q. What? 16 claim as es in this case? 16 A. The stress and emotional damage of imperiling 17 A. H of thousands of dollars. 17 my friendships and business relationships with no 1 8 Q. Are you paying him on an hourly basis? 18 relevance whatsoever to these cases, brought by a firm 20 Q. What is the hourly rate? 20 in discovery to harass my friends and social contacts 21 A. I'm not —I do not know, sir. 21 with no consideration or relevance to this case 22 Q. How much have you paid Marty Weinberger? 22 whatsoever, in an attempt to simply fleece — partly 23 A. I don't know the exact amount, sir. 23 fleece investors in South Florida out of millions of 24 Q. What's your best estimate? 24 dollars, sir. 25 A. More than a hundred thousand dollars. 25 Q. What is the value of those losses? + +8 Q. How much have you ' Mr. Goldberger? s Q. Who arc the people who arc authorized to make 1 1 Mr. Goldberger? 11 have to assert the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sit. 19 A. I believe so. 19 that whose partner sits in a Federal prison, who engaged + +1 MR. PIKE: Form. 1 MR. SCAROLA: Hopefully they will. 2 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure yet, sir. 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 3 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 4 Q. Do you have any idea at all? 4 THE WITNESS: I will respectfully decline to 5 A. Not sitting here today. 5 answer that. 6 Q. More or less than S10? 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 MR. PIKE: Form. 7 Q. On what basis? 8 THE WITNESS: I would guess it's more than s A. Attorney/client privilege. 9 SIO, sir. 9 MIL PIKE: And work product. 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 10 BY MR. SCAROLA: 11 Q. More or less than a hundred? 11 Q. Any other elements of damage? 12 A. I would guess it's quite an amount of money. 12 A. Not — there might be, but sit " g here today, 13 Q. Is it more or less than a hundred? 13 I can't think of them. 14 A. Yes, sir. 14 Q. Do you have written s any of your 15 Q. Mom or less than a thousand? 15 lawyers? 16 A. I would say it's more than 150,000. 16 A. I don't know. 17 Q. More or less than a million? 17 Q. Who does 18 A. I don't know, sir. 18 A. I don't w. 19 Q. So somewhere between '50,000 and a million? 19 MR. S OLA Lets take a shop break. We 20 A. No, sir. It's not — 20 may fin' 22 witness' testimony. 22 23 THE WITNESS: No, sir. That's not what I 23 recess.) 25 BY MR. SCAROLA: :18 p.m. + +21 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes the 21 D RAPHER: We are now off the record a! 24 said. I said, I did not know. 24 DEOGRAPI IER: We are back on video record it + +1 Q. Maybe more than a million? 2 A. Maybe. 2 Q. Do you attribute all of the damages that you 3 Q. More or less than a billion? 3 have described to Mr. conduct? 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 4 MR. PIKE: Form. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 how to proportion the conduct as opposed to 7 Q. Maybe more than a billion? 7 Mr. and his partner who sits in jail. I B A. Maybe more. s guess the U.S. Attorney will also make a decision 10 the value of that loss ' 10 to both damages and anything else he's done in this 11 MR. PIKE: y/client, work product. 11 case, sir. 12 To the ou answer without 12 BY MR. SCAROLA: 13 disclosin ur c crsations or the conversations 13 Q. But I'm not asking you about what the U.S. 14 with o omcys that you've delineated, 14 Attorney's opinion is. 15 15 I want to know whether you hold Mr. 16 BY MR. AROLA: 16 responsible for all of those elements of damage that you 17 Q. Or ou can just take the signal and say, I 17 have described to us. 18 refuse to answer because it's attorney/client privilege. 18 A. Its a difficult question to answer, 19 A. I resent that. 19 Mr. Scarola. 20 MR. PIKE: Move to strike. 20 Q. No, its easy. Yes. no, or I don't know. 21 THE WITNESS: But it's okay. You can continue 21 MR. PIKE: Mr. Scarola, you know as well as I 22 to try to harass me, sir. It doesn't work. The 22 do, the witness is attempting to answer your 23 ladies and gentlemen of the jury, hopefully when 23 question. 24 they see the deposition will recognize and see 24 MR. SCAROLA: I don't think so. I think he's 25 these pile of tricks. The answer— 25 attempting to evade all of my questions. + +BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 THE WITNESS: I don't know.!` 5 THE WITNESS: As a participant —I don't know 9 Q. How are you going to finding out what 9 to how much the conduct and proportion is relevant + +1 MR. PIKE: And I understand your contention. 1 the record. Mr. Scarola represents Mr. in 2 However, if you would, allow Mr. Epstein to finish 2 this case; is that correct, Mr. Scarola? 3 his response. 3 MR. That's correct. 4 THE WITNESS: Could you repeat your question? 4 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 5 MR. PIKE: And in this particular case, 6 Q. Do you hold Mr. responsible for all of 6 Epstein versus Rothstein, et al, Mr. who 7 the damages that you have described? 7 do you ificall represent? 8 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 8 MR. L.M. 9 THE WITNESS: It's difficult for me to 9 MR. PIKE: Okay. I believe that if you follow 10 proportion Mei:Sesta: — that I have described 10 through with questioning, you have an 11 between Mr. ,his partner, who is currently :1 irreconcilable conflict with regard to the other 12 in jail, his — the other people named in the 12 case in which you represent L.M. and L.M. 13 Complaint. Hopefully a jury will do that. 13 I cannot stop you from asking any questions; 14 BY MR. SCAROLA: .4 however, if you do move forward with asking 15 Q. Do you hold L.M. responsible for all of the :5 questions, I will take the appropriate action. 16 damages you have described? 16 MR. SCAR iiibehalf — on behalf of in> 17 MR. PIKE: Form. 17 client — 18 THE WITNESS: Again, these questions, these 18 MR. PI 19 ambiguous questions, as opposed to who 19 MR. ROL : — we do not accept your 20 participated, I would let Mr. and his 2 0 rise >. - t ethical 21 clients and his partners decide whose proportionate 21 c tt ties. 22 responsibility it is, sir. 22 t• : I That is absolutely fine for you to 23 BY MR. SCAROLA: 23 .i I just wanted to put it on the record 24 Q. So you defer to them? 24 am, by no means, going to prevent you from 25 MR. PIKE: Form. uestioning today. However, I wanted to put my + +1 THE WITNESS: Asprionate to the 2 of damages, I think Mr. played a V anne 2 Okay. 3 role. I believe his partners potentially played 3 CROSS EXAMINATION 4 role. I've only had any contact with Mr. 4 BY MR. 5 sir. 5 Q. Mr. Epstein, is your sole basis for your claim 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 against L.M. that she changed her testimony from the 7 Q. Which partners? 7 time she testified to the FBI in 2007? B A. Beg your pardon? 8 MR. PIKE: Form. To the extent you can answer 9 Q. Which partners, bcsid r and 9 that question without invading attorney/client, 10 Mr. Rothstein, do aim en ged in conduct that 10 work product, you can do so. 11 renders them liab t u? 11 THE WITNESS: Unfortunately, rd like to 12 A. I bcli n omplaint, sir. And I 12 answer that question, but I can't do so without 13 believe it's . Adl Mr. Berger. There's Mr. Scone. 13 invading attorney/elicit privilege. 14 Mr. Fist n, are not partners. 14 BY MR. 15 • erger, Mr. Adler — and I forgot the 15 Q. Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was 16 names o others at the moment, sir, but it's in the 16 filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend 17 Complain . 17 to be false? 18 Q. Why didn't you sue them? 18 MR. PIKE: Asked and answered. 19 MR. PIKE: Form. 19 THE WITNESS: I recognize, Mr. M, again. 20 THE WITNESS: Attorney/client privilege, sir. 20 the concept of attempting me to get to waive my 21 MR. PIKE: Work product. 21 Fifth Amendment privilege; however, in this lawsuit 22 MR. SCAROLA: I have no further questions. 22 I've answered questions with respect to your 23 MR. I have three or four questions. 23 lawsuit. And with regard to the question you just 24 That's it. 24 asked, I'm going to have to, unfortunately, assert 25 MR. PIKE: Okay. 'just want to be clear for 25 my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th + +contention on the record. + +1 Amendment Right. 1 notations on the Complaint? 2 But I'm willing to listen to any other 2 MR. PIKE: Form. Mischaracterizes testimony. 3 questions u ma have. 3 THE WITNESS: My testimony was, I only read 4 MR. : Finished. 4 the black letter and partially because I cannot see 5 MR. PIKE: I have a couple questions. 5 thoroughly through these glasses, sir. 6 CROSS EXAMINATION 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 7 BY MR. PIKE: 7 Q. Is it your contention that those glasses did 8 Q. Mr. Epstein, earlier in the deposition 8 not sufficiently correct your vision to be able to read 10 filed in the Epstein versus Rothstein, Roscnfeldt and 10 to you? i1 Adler, et al. Do you recall that? 11 MR. PIKE: Form. 12 A. Yes, sir. 12 THE WITNESS: Again, play this game 13 Q. And then I showed you page 2 of a Complaint 13 back and forth. What !just I think I 14 that I had my notes on, correct? 14 was very clear, that I di. notes. I 15 A. Yes. 15 said— 16 Q. Did you read the black type or did you read 16 BY MR. SCARO 17 the handwritten notes in the comers of the Complaint. 17 Q. What yo couldn't read the 18 that particular page that I showed you? 18 notes? 19 A. Unfortunately, my eyesight is not good enough 19 MR. P : Al w the witness to finish. 20 to read the notes. I only read the black letter. 20 THE : Let me finish. And what I said 21 Q. And it was that one sentence, correct? 21 w these glasses it would be almost 22 A. It was two sentences, I believe, but, yes. 22 for me to read the notes on the page. 23 MR. PIKE: Thank you. 23 AROLA: 24 We'll read. 24 es, sir. So your contention is, that those 25 REDIRECT EXAMINATION I s do not adequately correct your vision to be able + +9 Mr. Scarola was reading from page 2 of the Complain' 9 the handwritten notations on the papers that were handed + +1 BY MR. SCAROLA: to read the handwritten notations; is that correct? 2 Q. What is your eyesight? 7 2 MR. PIKE: Form. 3 A. Sorry? 3 THE WITNESS: In this particular instance, 4 Q. What is your eyesight? 4 sir, these glasses did not. I'm not saying they 5 A. My eyesight? A 14 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Job #1358 + +CO S + +### 1 ERRATA SIIEET + +2 IN RE: EPSTEIN ET AL CR: S. TOWNS 3 DEPOSMON OF: JEFFREY EPSTEIN 4 TAKEN: 3/17/10 JOB NO.: 1358 + +6 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER 1 7 PAGE N LINEN CHANGE REASON + +t er + +18 Please forward the migim1signed errata sheet to this office so that copies may be dtstributed to all parries. + +Linder penalty of pi:May.1(1:0mo that read my 20 deposition and that it is true and correct subject to any changes in form or substance entered here. + +22 DATE: + +24 SIGNATURE OF DEPONENT: + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +DEFENDANT ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████ INTERROGATORIES +TO PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. ██████, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that General Interrogatories numbered 1 through 16 have been directed to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, this 16th day of September, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 16th day of September, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for ██████ J. ██████ + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +### DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, J. INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAN , EPSTEIN + +(If answering for another person or entity, answer with respect to that sgn or entity, unless otherwise stated.) + +- 1. What is the full name and Florida address of the, answering these interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official p on or relationship with the party to whom the interrogatories are directed?\_ +- 2. What is your best estimatez the number of minor females' with whom you have had physical contact hitt last 10 years, when at the time of the physical contact: + - a. i e)4( St e genitals or breasts of the minor female were exposed the minor female was clothed only in underwear tals were exposed + +• &quot; minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have reason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +- 3. What is your best estimate of the number of times in the last 10 years when you have had physical contact with minor females when at the time of the physical contact: + - a. your genitals were exposed + - b. the genitals or breasts of the minor female were + - c. the minor female was clothed only in tmderw 4 S) +- 4. What is your best estimate number of times you have witnessed Ghislaine Maxwell engage in sexu twit with minor females? +- 5. Mattis the total obligation that has been incurred to date for both fees and costs , -(both paid and currently owing) in connection with your representation in this lawsuit? + +• &quot;sexual activity" for purposes of these interrogatories means any physical contact with the genitals or exposed breasts of another person. + +- 6. With regard to the last time you engaged in sexual activity with a minor, state the following: + - a. the identity of the minor (name and last known address) + - b. the date 444" + - c. the location l O + - d. a description of the sexual activity /S ) +- 7. Describe in detail all information, written or oral, which William Scherer or any attorney or agent of the law firm of Conrad Scherer has provided to you or your attorne s h a any allegation which has been asserted in this case against \_Describe in your own words all interaction you have had with the individual identified in this action as L.M., including but not limited to the dates, places, participants in, witnesses to, and a description of all sexual activity involving L.M. + +- 9. What is the name and last known address of eery healthcare provider with whom you have treated or been evaluated for any sexual disorder? 444/ +- 10. List all former names and when you were known ht- Onse ames. State all addresses where you have lived for the past 10 years', the dates you lived at each address, your Social Security number, and your dote °third]. +- 11. Have you ever been convicted ( \fva crime, other than any juvenile adjudication, which under the law under which you were convicted was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year, or that involved dishonesty or a false statement regardless of th punishment? ii..., + +If so each conviction: + +- (a;IS The specific crime; +- (b) The date and place of conviction. + +AkS + +- 12. List the names and addresses of all persons who are believed or known by you, your agents or attorneys to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit; and specify the subject matter about which the witness has knowledge. + +O -SA + +- 13. Have you heard or do you know about any statement or remark made by or on behalf of any party to this lawsuit, other th yo elf, concerning any issue in this lawsuit? + +If so: + +IS ) + +- (a) State the name an&adcicss of each person who made the statement or statements. +- (b) State the name and address of each person who heard it. N (e)" State the date, time, place and substance of each statement. + +- 14. State the name and address of every person known to you, your agents, or attorneys, who has knowledge about, or possession, custody or control of any physical evidence, model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, video tape, or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy; and describe as to each, what such person has, the name and address of the person who took or prepared it, and the date it was taken or prepared. +- 15. Have you made an a'ettme with anyone that would limit that party's liability to anyone for any the \*naps sued upon in this case? If so, state the terms of the agreement and tje parp to it. + +- 16. Please state if you have ever been a party, either plaintiff or defendant, in a lawsuit other than the present matter and if so, state whether you were plaintiff or defendant, the nature of the action, the date and court in which such suit was filed, the nature of the disposition of each matter, and (if the matter has been settled) describe all terms and conditions of the settlement including the nature and amount of all consideration paid by you or on your behalf in contistaion with each settlement. + +J O + +STATE OF + +'C)C + +COUNTY OF ) + +The foregoing instrument o Tedged before me this day of , 20 , by , who is personally known to me or who has produced 0 as identification and who did did/ not take an oath. + +AS ' Illir + +(SEALi X'...) + +(Notary signature) + +(Notary name - print) + +NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +(Serial number, if any) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, an y + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +EctS + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFRE.thEPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, GENERAL INTERROGATORIES DA + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Rules • • Procedure, files his objections to the General Interrogatories of Defendant/C ter aintiff, J. and would state as follows: + +1. With regard to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objectsibtse the interrogatories seek irrelevant information, are burdensome, are propounc;\ purpose of harassment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Am m t of the United States Constitution. + +2. With regard to Interrogatories 10, II, and 16, the interrogatories seek information that is irrelevant, burdensome to produce, and unlikely to lead to discoverable information. + +3. With regard to Interrogatory No. 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trus. and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via O Email, O Facsimile, VU.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this /p 4I'day of October, 2010 to: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +C C) + +/S)C + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 709s.. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 '..) ( S" + +crman, Jr. + +54 BURNETT P.A. 901 oint est 777 Sou lagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ Counter-defendant + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +██████ J. ██████, hereby gives notice pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that an Interrogatory has been directed to Jeffrey Epstein, this 20th day of August, 2013. + +It is requested that the aforesaid answers be served within thirty (30) days at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of August, 2013. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Primary E-mail: jsx@searcylaw.com + +Secondary E-mail(s): mep@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Notice of Service of Interrogatory to Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +haddadfm@aol.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +Debbie@Tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +adv. Epstein Notice of Service of Interrogatory to Jeffrey Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +### INTERROGATORY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +(If answering for another person or entity, answer with respect to that person or entity, unless otherwise stated.) + +- A. With regard to all communications that occurred at any time,prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against in which comm cation you expressed the position that was a knowing natttripantin the efforts of Scott x./ Rothstein to defraud investors (the Scott Rojpstein\p, ' scheme) or that -..\* \ i engaged in any misconduct 4 rela ' e Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, state the following: +- I. a detailed description of the conte iecommunication; +- 2. all participants in and parties,to ilieoltirnunication; +- 3. the date, time, place and e utistances of the communication including how the communication was +- 4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever subsequently 4t related to any other rson; +- 5. whether\_; manner an if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such memorialization. A/c B.\ With regard to any request, direction, or authorization to sue communicated by you at any time prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against state the following: w the contents of the communication were ever memorialized in any +- 1. a detailed description of the contents of the communication; +- 2. all participants in and parties to the communication; + +adv. Epstein Notice of Service of Interrogatory to Jeffrey Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800X.XXXMBAG + +- 3. the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including how the communication was made; +- 4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever subsequently related to any other person; +- 5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memollrted in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such mein melon. + +In the event that you claim that any responsive infaEmatign sought by these interrogatories is privileged, identify every privilege purst c ) win you claim protection. + +STATE OF ( S" + +COUNTY OF V + +The foregoing instrum nt cknowledged before me this day of , 20 by , who is personally known to i me or who has produced llt, as identification and who did/did not take an oath. ?S i + +\O (SEAL1- (Notary signature) + +(Notary name - print) NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida + +(Serial number, if any) + +IN COUNTY, + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AND FOR PALM BEACH FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. COS + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO INTERR TORIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to this Court's order and Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files his amended' responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Edward's term atones to Jeffrey Epstein as follows: + +A. With regard to logommunications that occurred at any time prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against in which communication you expressed the position that was a knowing participant in the efforts of Scott Roth". to defraud investors (the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme) or that engaged in any misconduct relating to the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, state the following: + +- 1. a detailed description of the contents of the communication; + +&#x27; As per the trial court's order and pending hearing, Epstein is not responding as to any communication that may have occurred with counsel. + +- 2. all participants in and parties to the communication; +- 3. the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including how the communication was made; +- 4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever subsequently related to any other person; +- 5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memorialized in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such memorialization. + +ANSWER: No such non-privileged communication occurred. In other words, I never had any conversation regarding the propriety of filing suit against Rothstein and with anyone other than my counsel(s), which would require the disclosure of information that is protected by the attorney/client privilege. United Services Auto. Ass'n. v. Roth, 859 So. 2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd., 958 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert the attorney/client privilege as provided for in § 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. + +B. With regard to any request, direction, or authorization to sue communicated by you at any time prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against state the following: + +- 1. a detailed description of the contents of the communication; +- 2. all participants in and parties to the communication; +- 3. the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including how the communication was made; +- 4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever subsequently related to any other person; +- 5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memorialized in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such memorialization. + +ANSWER: No such non-privileged communication occurred. In other words, I never had a conversation as delineated above with anyone other than my counsel(s), which would require the disclosure of information that is protected by the attorney/client privilege. United Services Auto. Ass 'n. v. Roth, 859 So. 2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd, 958 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert the attorney/client privilege as provided for in § 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below, via Electronic Service, this November 5, 2013. + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +LAW OFFICES OE TOMA HADDAD, PA + +315 SE 7th Street + +Suite 301 + +"tort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +4.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +(,) + +![]()STATE OF NEW YORK ) + ) \$\$.: + COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) + +Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Jeffrey Epstein, who being personally known to me, and who first being duly sworn, says that he has read the foregoing, Amended Responses To Interrogatories, and that all of the matters therein are true and correct, this November 5, 2013. + +![]()NOTARY/PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK + +HARRY J. BELLER + Neterv Public, State of New York + No. 01574891994 + Qualified in Rockland County + Commission Executs Feb. 17, 20 14 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +# SERVICE LIST + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx®searcylaw.com; mep®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. jgoldbergen@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpacom 250 Suite 1400 Australian Ave. South aic Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +t s + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ) O + +o ) S athtojustice.c -4C J. a, Esq. ' Jaffe Weissina Fistos Lehrman Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 + +( S \ + +Fred Haddad, Esq. Dee®FredHaddadLaw.com 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Tonja Haddad ColemanIcAtfire Tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling®tonjahaddad.com Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +W. Chester IME, Jr. One Clearlake Center Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 wcblaw®aol.com; wcbcg®aol.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bb021732ab0da20a337379a7604fde703ea10dc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800/EFTA02762800.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2927 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762800.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 59, + "chars": 161131, + "elapsed_seconds": 145.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 71.949 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 114.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nSUPPORT OF HIS NOTICE OF FILING DEP \nAND DISCOVERY RESPONSES BY JEF \nATTORNEY-CL \nIX OF DOCUMENTS IN \nRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS \nTEIN IMPLICATING THE \nRIVILEGE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 390.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 390.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 165.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 405.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 406.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 217.87199999999999, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 217.87199999999999, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH 2 STATE OF FLORIDA 3 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 429.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 215.0511932373047, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 215.0511932373047, + 70.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 70.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 ERRATA SIIEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.439998626708984, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 185.54754638671875, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 185.54754638671875, + 406.36944580078125 + ], + [ + 50.439998626708984, + 406.36944580078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 377.46000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 148.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, J. \nINTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAN , EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 543.7822265625, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 543.7822265625, + 191.60302734375 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 191.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFRE.thEPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, \nGENERAL INTERROGATORIES DA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 521.4205322265625, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 521.4205322265625, + 395.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 395.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 178.2 + ], + [ + 387.020263671875, + 178.2 + ], + [ + 387.020263671875, + 193.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 193.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.28499999999997, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 525.9799999999999, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 525.9799999999999, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 299.28499999999997, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.15, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 493.255, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 493.255, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 101.15, + 349.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.89999999999998, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 341.5299999999999, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 341.5299999999999, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 249.89999999999998, + 140.13 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.74, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 419.0049743652344, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 419.0049743652344, + 157.10302734375 + ], + [ + 173.74, + 157.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nAND FOR PALM BEACH \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.224, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 528.2208862304688, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 528.2208862304688, + 116.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 307.224, + 116.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED \nRESPONSES TO INTERR TORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.312, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 480.513427734375, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 480.513427734375, + 340.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 138.312, + 340.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 356.8575439453125, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 356.8575439453125, + 75.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 75.9735107421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 157 + ], + [ + "Text", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Text", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 383 + ], + [ + "Line", + 187 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Text", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 148 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Text", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 242 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 150 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762800" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25e6d298030f6369bc8f121774c5ba61e9188906 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X1OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## REOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTIkiiPIS:61JANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES SECT O\*S01 AND 90.203 + +Counter-Plaintiff, d through undersigned counsel, hereby requests, pursuant to the Section 90.202(5 c,115, d Section 90.203, Fla. Stat., that this Court take judicial notice of the docket sh in e 'lowing cases: + +- 1. A.C. v. Jeffrey Epstein ellen, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No.: 50 2008 CA 0251 MB Al; +- 2. B.B. V. Jeffrey E &==, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No.: 50 2 A 0 319 XXXX MBAB; +- 3. C.L. c) ter et al, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-80447-KAM; . effrey Epstein & IS Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case 2008 CA 005240 XXXX MB AF; +- 5. ME v. Jeffrey Epstein &I , U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08- 80811-C1V-ZLOCH/SNOW; +- 6. Doe v. Jeffey Epstein, et al, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:08-cv-80119- ICAM; + +1. 7. *Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:08-cv-80804-KAM; +2. 8. *Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-80469-KAM; +3. 9. *Doe No. 8 v. Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM; +4. 10. *Doe No. 101 v. Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-805919-KAM; +5. 11. *Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-80656-KAM; +6. 12. *Doe No. 103 v. Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:09-cv-80309-KAM; +7. 13. *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein & Sarah Kellen*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No.: 50 2008 CA 028058 XXXX MB AD; +8. 14. *J v. Epstein, et al*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 9:10-cv-81111-KAM; +9. 15. *Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein & Sarah [REDACTED]*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80893-CIV-[REDACTED] RRA/JOHNSON; +10. 16. *Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein & [REDACTED]*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/[REDACTED]; +11. 17. *Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein, [REDACTED] & [REDACTED]*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No.: 50 2008 CA 020614 XXXX MB AF; +12. 18. *Jane Doe 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein & [REDACTED]*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/[REDACTED]; +13. 19. *Jane Doe 4 v. Jeffrey Epstein & [REDACTED]*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/[REDACTED]; +14. 20. *Jane Doe 5 v. Jeffrey Epstein & [REDACTED]*, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/[REDACTED]; + +- 21. Jane Doe 6 v. Jefrey Epstein Aim& EM, U.S. Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-80994-CIV-MARR +- 22. Jane Doe 7 It JeffleyEp.s , 08-80993-CIV-mARRA Epstein Southern District of Florida, Case No.: +- 23. Jane Doe (s.G.) v. Jeffley Epstein, Palm Beach County, Case No.: 50 2008 CA 0006596 XXXX MB No.: 50 2008 CA 028051 )OCOC MB AD; +- 24. LM v. Jeffley Epstein & , 15th Judicial Circuite +- 25. L.M. Circuit, County, Case + - v. Jeffrey Epstein & U.S. Southern sct o lorida, Case No.: 9:08 cv-81092-ICAM; + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct e foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this + +> OLA CDA P. VITALE JR. No.: 169440 Fl da Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: dvitale®searcylaw.com and mmccann®searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 6864300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for + +2017. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request for Judicial Notice +Page 5 of 6 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7fa161c3c0225d8722e526209fb19156cc8ef45 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859/EFTA02762859.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762859.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 5153, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.52, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 70.295 + ], + [ + 543.1598510742188, + 70.295 + ], + [ + 543.1598510742188, + 113.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 113.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTIkiiPIS:61JANT TO \nFLORIDA STATUTES SECT O*S01 AND 90.203", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 454.4920654296875, + 332.454 + ], + [ + 454.4920654296875, + 362.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 362.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762859" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..803d6e31b386ddbe16fb7e14be9d1739baa06020 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.md @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +## MOTION TO COMPEL PAYMENT QF DEPOSITION EXPENSES + +J. , by and throw tt dersigned attorneys, moves this Honorable Court for entry of an Order compellin ter-defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to pay the expenses incurred in the defense depositi xpert, Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. Of the expenses indicated by an asterisk on the attadhed invoice, the only expense agreed to be paid is the December 1 expense of \$800.00 for 2 hours of deposition time. + +WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Counter-defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, be required to pay all deposition-related expenses for this expert deposition totaling \$3,126.53. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of Dec., 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses + +COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +04 + +Record of Expenses for Bernard J. Jansen, Jansen Expert Witnessing, LLC for the case, originally styled: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. J. Jansen, individually, and L. M., individually, Defendant, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XX3OGMBAG + +| Date | Task | Start Time | Stop Time | Hours | Wages | Expense | Total | Comments | +|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------|---------|----------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 13-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 7:20 | 7:32 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 13-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 1:58 | 2:53 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 13-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola; Deposition dates; Market Research | 9:05 | 10:00 | 0.50 | \$200 | \$- | \$200.00 | | +| 14-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 4:46 | 5:08 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 14-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 7:50 | 8:01 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 14-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 8:56 | 8:56 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 14-
Nov | Travel arrangements | 9:30 | 10:01 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 14-
Nov | Email with Tina L. [REDACTED]; Email with Jack Scarola | 1:27 | 2:04 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 15-
Nov | Email with Mary McCann | 4:55 | 4:55 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 15-
Nov | Email with Tina L. [REDACTED] | 5:50 | 5:50 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 16-
Nov | Email with Mary McCann | 3:09 | 3:09 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 23-
Nov | Travel arrangements | 10:00 | 10:45 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 27-
Nov | Documents together for depositions; review of documents | 7:51 | 9:04 | 1.00 | \$400 | \$- | \$400.00 | | +| 28-
Nov | Documents together for depositions; review of documents | 8:00 | 8:17 | 0.25 | \$100 | \$- | \$100.00 | | +| 29-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 5:55 | 6:00 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 30-
Nov | Travel to Depo | | | | \$- | \$- | \$- | | +| | Uber to airport | | | | \$- | \$20.08 | \$20.08 | | +| | Travel time as per retainer | | | 2.00 | \$800 | \$- | \$800.00 | | +| | Rental | | | | \$- | \$72.27 | \$72.27 | See attached | +| | Hotel | | | | \$- | \$184.26 | \$184.26 | See attached | +| | Flight | | | | \$- | \$428.00 | \$428.00 | Note: only charge flight from Charlottesville, VA even though flight was from Doha, Qatar | +| 30-
Nov | Depo Prep | 1:10 | 3:43 | 2.50 | \$1,000 | \$- | \$1,000.00 | | +| 30-
Nov | Email with Jack Scarola | 6:15 | 7:30 | 0.00 | \$- | \$- | \$- | no charge | +| 1-
Dec | Depo Prep; Downloaded documents; Review of documents; review of report; Review of cv, Review of all supporting documents; Review of all webpages; Review of traffic services; Review of traffic reports | 3:00 | 7:30 | 4.50 | \$1,800 | \$- | \$1,800.00 | | +| 1-
Dec | Depo Prep | 8:10 | 9:10 | 1.00 | \$400 | \$- | \$400.00 | | +| 1-
Dec | Deposition | 9:20 | 11:20 | 2.00 | \$800 | \$- | \$800.00 | | +| 1-
Dec | Travel from Depo | | | | \$- | \$- | \$- | | +| | Travel time as per retainer | | | 2.00 | \$800 | \$- | \$800.00 | | +| | Taxi from airport | | | | \$- | \$21.92 | \$21.92 | No receipt | + +\*\*\* + +\* + +\*\* + +| Date | Task | Start Time | Stop Time | Hours | Wages | Expense | Total | Comments | +|------|------|------------|-----------|------------|---------|---------|------------|----------| +| | | | | 15.75 | \$6,300 | Total | \$7,026.53 | | +| | | | | \$726.53 | | | | | +| | | | | \$7,026.53 | | | \$7,026.53 | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5ab734f8387d5c0cf1cc76e6417fc836ee790db --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865/EFTA02762865.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762865.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 15581, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 538.5093994140625, + 73.603 + ], + [ + 538.5093994140625, + 116.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 116.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO COMPEL PAYMENT QF DEPOSITION EXPENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 363.053 + ], + [ + 483.5796813964844, + 363.053 + ], + [ + 483.5796813964844, + 379.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 379.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762865" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e4dcd93d433130633b5e02edd9eeb0d4ff0e812 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.md @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: &lt; + +DATE: December 14, 2017 TIME: 8:45 a.m. JUDGE: Honorable-Donald Hafele PLACE: ROOM #: 205 e \ : Dixie ." Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +## SPECIFICNIATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +MOTION TO COMPEL PAYMENT OF DEPOSITION EXPENSES + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the n are self represented. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forego' t via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 611 day of + ++6s + +A + +o.: 169440 + +-Mail: isx@.searcvlaw.com; and @,searcylaw.com + +ary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com + +y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-31i + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +a adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +IS 9 + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitied, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Id enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +O \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe7874801479085694e065b5abb0769b88e1b985 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871/EFTA02762871.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762871.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4333, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 352.30199999999996 + ], + [ + 372.4038391113281, + 352.30199999999996 + ], + [ + 372.4038391113281, + 367.60302734375 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 367.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFICNIATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 573.1109999999999 + ], + [ + 281.70172119140625, + 573.1109999999999 + ], + [ + 281.70172119140625, + 588.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 588.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762871" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26432a83b47cccee5f1c9cdda0c40df4f7607128 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.md @@ -0,0 +1,476 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING DOCUMENTS PRESENTED TO COURT AT R 5, 2017, HEARING + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epste. ("NO), hereby gives notice of the filing of the following documents that were presen o ,Court at the December 5, 2017, hearing: + +- 1. In re Investigation of September 24, 2007, Non-Prosecution Agreement; October 29, 2007, A nd December 7, 2007, Affirmation (Exhibit A); and + - 2. Jeffrey E. Epste e 30, 2008, Plea (Exhibit B). + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 6, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many ,Fr2 Primary: Scott®lin ockljtw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(S•S1 E r Co unsel fo r Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +# SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +-• • 4 f + +IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +# NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT + +IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); + +IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; + +t,\2 IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Fetal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation into Epstein's background end any offenses that may have been committed by Epstein against the United States from in or around 2001 through in or around September 2007, including: + +- (I) knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, that is, to use a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, or entice minor females to engage in prostitution, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b); all in violation ofTitle18,United States Code, Section 371; +- (2) knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to travel in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, in violation of Title IS, United States Code, Section 2423(b); all in violation of Title 18, United States ACode, Section 2423(e); ing a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly + - persuade, induce, or entice minor females to engage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2; + - (4) traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(1), with minor females; in violation + +of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b); and + +- (5) knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, recruiting, enticing, and obtaining by any means a person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c)(1); in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1) and 2; and + +IT APPEARING that Epstein seeks to resolve globally his state and federal criminal liability and Epstein understands and acknowledges that, in exchange for the benefits provided by this agreement, he agrees to comply with its terms, including undertaking certain actions with the State Attorney's Office; + +IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Thisteirt'simckground by both State and Federal law enforcement agencies, and after due consultation with the State Attorney's Office, that the interests of the United States, tht Stitt of Florida, and the Defendant will be served by the following procedurq + +THEREFORE, on the authority of R. A lexandeM United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, prosecution in this District for these offenses shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein abides by the following conditions and the requirements of this Agreement set forth below. + +If the United States Attorney should determine, based on reliable evidence, that, during the period of the Agreement, Epstein willfully violated any of the conditions of this Agreement, then the United States Attorney may, within ninety (90) days following the expiration of the term of home confinement discussed below, provide Epstein with timely notice specifying the condition(s) of the Agreement that he hes violated, and shall initiate its prosecution on any offense within sixty (60) days' of giving notice of the violation. Any notice provided to Epstein pursuant to this paragraph shall be provided within 60 days of the United States learning of facts which may provide a basis for a determination of a breach of the Agreement. t r• + +After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no prosecution for the offenses set out on pages 1 and 2 of this Agreement, nor any other offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office, nor any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand Jury investigation will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein ifany, will be dismisscd. + +## Terms of the Agreement: + +- 1. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nolo contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case No. 2006-cf-009495AXXXM13) charging one (I) count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fl. Stat. § 796.07. In addition, Epstein shall plead guilty to an Information filed by the State Attorney's Office charging Epstein with an offense that requires him to register as a sex offender, that is, the solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.03; s, +- 2. Epstein shall make a binding recommendation that tlu court impose a thirty (30) month sentence to be divided as folio + - (a) Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) months and six (6) months in county jail for all charges, without any opportunity for withholding adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment; and + - (b) Epstein shall be sentenced to a term of twelve (12) months of community control consecutive to his two terms in county jail as described in Term 2(a), supra. +- 3. This agreement is contingent upon a Judge of the 15th Judicial Circuit accepting and executing the sentence agreed upon between the State Attorney's Office and Epstein, the details of which arc set forth in this agreement. The terms contained in paragraphs 1 and 2, supra, do not foreclose Epstein and the State Attorney's Office from agreeing to recommend any additional charge(s) or any additional term(s) of probation and/or incarceration. Epstein shall waive all challenges to the Information filed by the State Attorney's Office and shall waive the right to appeal his conviction and sentence, except a sentence that exceeds what is set forth in paragraph (2), supra. +- 6. Epstein shall provide to the U.S. Attorney's Office copies of all + +proposed agreements with the State Attorney's Office prior to entering into those agreements. + +- 7. The United States shall provide Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it has identified as victims, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, rifler Epstein has signed this agreement and been sentenced. Upon the execution of this agreement, the United States, in consultation with and subject to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, shall select an attorney representative for thesepersons, who shall be paid for by Epstein. Epstein's counsel may contact the identified individuals through that representative. —4, L aw +- 8. If any 'of the individuals referred to in paragraph (7), supra, elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255; Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives his right to contest damages up to an amount as agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein, so long as the identified individual elects to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and agrees to waive any other claim for damages, whether pursuant to state, federal, or common law. Notwithstanding this waiver, as to those individuals whose names appear on the list provided by the United States, Epstein's signature on this agreement, his waivers and failures to contest liability and such damages in any suit are not to be construed as an admission of any criminal or ilizitIffbIlity. +- 9. Epstein's signature on this agreement also is not to be construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability or a waiver of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person whose name does not appear on the list provided by the United States. Except as to those individuals who elect to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, as set forth in paragraph (8), supra, neither Epstein's signature on this agreement, nor its terms, nor any resulting waivers or settlements by Epstein arc to be construed as admissions or evidence of civil or criminal liability or a waiver of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether or not her name appears on the list provided by the United States. +- 11. Epstein shall use his best efforts to enter his guilty plea and be + +sentenced not later than October 26, 2007. The United States has no objection to Epstein self-reporting to begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008. + +1. 12. Epstein agrees that he will not be afforded any benefits with respect to gain time, other than the rights, opportunities, and benefits as any other inmate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. +2. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. If the United States receives a Freedom of Information Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein before making that disclosure. + +Epstein understands that the United States Attorney has no authority to require the State Attorney's Office to abide by any terms of this agreement. Epstein understands that it is his obligation to undertake discussions with the State Attorney's Office and to use his best efforts to ensure compliance with these procedures, which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' interest. Epstein also understands that it is his obligation to use his best efforts to convince the Judge of the 15th Judicial Circuit to accept Epstein's binding recommendation regarding the sentence to be imposed, and understands that the failure to do so will be a breach of the agreement. + +In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to [redacted], Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or [redacted]. Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jury investigation will be suspended, and all pending federal Grand Jury subpoenas will be held in abeyance unless and until the defendant violates any term of this agreement. The defendant likewise agrees to withdraw his pending motion to intervene and to quash certain grand jury subpoenas. Both parties agree to maintain their evidence, specifically evidence requested by or directly related to the grand jury subpoenas that have been issued, and including certain computer equipment, inviolate until all of the terms of this agreement have been satisfied. Upon the successful completion of the terms of this agreement, all outstanding grand jury subpoenas shall be deemed withdrawn. + +By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that each of these terms is material to this agreement and is supported by independent consideration and that a breach of any one of these conditions allows the United States to elect to terminate the agreement and to investigate and prosecute Epstein and any other individual or entity for any and all federal offenses. + +By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that he is aware of the fact that the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial. Epstein further is aware that Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that the Court may dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint for unnecessary delay in presenting a charge to the Grand Jury, filing an information, or in bringing a defendant to trial. Epstein hereby requests that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida defer such prosecution. Epstein agrees and consents that any delay from the date of this Agreement to the date of initiation of prosecution, as provided for in the terms expressed herein, shall be deemed to be a necessary delay at his own request, and he hereby waives any defense to such prosecution on the ground that such delay operated to deny him rights under Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to a speedy trial or to bar the prosecution by reason of the running of the statute of limitations for a period of months equal to the period between the signing of this agreement and the breach of this agreement as to those offenses that were the subject of the grand jury's investigation. Epstein further asserts and certifies that he understands that the Fifth Amendment and Rule 7(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that all felonies must be charged in an indictment presented to a grand jury. Epstein hereby agrees and consents that, if a prosecution against him is instituted for any offense that was the subject of the grand jury's investigation, it may be by way of an Information signed and filed by the United States Attorney, and hereby waives his right to be indicted by a grand jury as to any such offense. + +/// + +/// + +/// + +t + +By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. + +> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +Dated: By: + +Dated: + +Dated: + +Dated: + +A. VILLAFAgA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY + +GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. NCOUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +LILLY ANN , ESQ. ATTORNEY POR FFREY EPSTEIN + +It + +By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. + +R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA +UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +Dated: \_\_\_\_\_ + +By: + +A. [REDACTED] VILLAFAÑA +ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY + +Dated: \_\_\_\_\_ + +\_\_\_\_\_ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Dated: + +9/24/07 + +![]()Dated: \_\_\_\_\_ + +LILLY ANN [REDACTED], ESQ. +ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to hint. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. + +> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +Dated: + +Dated: + +Dated: + +Dated:q—A14- 0? — + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +IN RE: + +**INVESTIGATION OF** + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +**ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT** + +IT APPEARING that the parties seek to clarify certain provisions of page 4, paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (hereinafter "paragraph 7"), that agreement is modified as follows: + +1. 7A. The United States has the right to assign to an independent third-party the responsibility for consulting with and, subject to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreement. If the United States elects to assign this responsibility to an independent third-party, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to make good faith objections to the attorney representative suggested by the independent third-party prior to the final designation of the attorney representative. +2. 7B. The parties will jointly prepare a short written submission to the independent third-party regarding the role of the attorney representative and regarding Epstein's Agreement to pay such attorney representative his or her regular customary hourly rate for representing such victims subject to the provisions of paragraph C, infra. +3. 7C. Pursuant to additional paragraph 7A, Epstein has agreed to pay the fees of the attorney representative selected by the independent third party. This provision, however, shall not obligate Epstein to pay the fees and costs of contested litigation filed against him. Thus, if after consideration of potential settlements, an attorney representative elects to file a contested lawsuit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s 2255 or elects to pursue any other contested remedy, the paragraph 7 obligation of the Agreement to pay the costs of the attorney representative, as opposed to any statutory or other obligations to pay reasonable attorneys fees and costs such as those contained in s 2255 to bear the costs of the attorney representative, shall cease. + +By signing this Addendum. Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein hereby, =MS that he understands the clarifications to the Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with than. + +> It ALEXANDER ACOSTA UND ht) STATES ATTORNEY + +Dated: By: Dated: Dated: Dated: AS U.S. ATTORNEY COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN \_4g LILLY ANN ATTORNEY EPSTEIN C + +A. VILLAPANA + +GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. + +By signing this Addendum, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the clarifications to the Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. + +> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Er• A.= VILIAFARA ASSISTANT V.S. ATTOR / 61 JEFFREY EPSTEIN D LEFCOGRT ESQ. ( S A14/ ,UNSEL TO JEF Y EPSTEIN ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +LILLY ANN ESQ. + +By signing this Addendum, Epstein asserts and certifiers that the above has been cud and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the clarifications to Me Non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with than. + +Datml: + +Dated: + +Dated: + +Data!: Yt\_\_\_113' + +R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY + +VILLAF ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORN + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +LILLY AN ANCHEZ, ES Q: ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY BPS7EIN + +Affirmation + +I, Jeffrey B. Epstein do hereby re-affirm the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum to same dated October 30, 2007. + +![]()![]()NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT** +**THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT** + +Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein + +Plea: Guilty X + +| Case No. | Charge | Count | Lesser | Degree | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|-------|--------|--------| +| 06CF009454AMB | Felony Solicitation of Prostitution | 1 | No | 3 FEL | +| 08CF009381AMB | Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution | 1 | No | 2 FEL | + +PSI: Waived/Not Required X Required/Requested \_\_\_\_\_ + +ADJUDICATION: Adjudicate [x ] + +**SENTENCE:** + +■ 06CF009454AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 12 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility, with credit for 1 (one) day time served. + +On 08CF009381AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 6 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility, with credit for 1 (one) day time served. This 6 month sentence is to be served consecutive to the 12-month sentence in 06CF009454AMB. Following this 6 month sentence, the Defendant will be placed on 12 months Community Control 1 (one). The conditions of community control are attached hereto and incorporated herein. + +**OTHER COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS:** + +As a special condition of his community control, the Defendant is to have no unsupervised contact with minors, and the supervising adult must be approved by the Department of Corrections. + +The Defendant is designated as a Sexual Offender pursuant to Florida Statute 943.0435 and must abide by all the corresponding requirements of the statute, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. + +The Defendant must provide a DNA sample in court at the time of this plea. + +Assistant State Attorney + +Date of Plea + +Attorney for the Defendant + +Defendant + +948.101 Terms and conditions of consmusilty control and criminal quarantine community . control.— + +(1) The court shall determine the terms and conditions of community control. Conditions • specified in this subsection do not requiro oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and may bo considered standard conditions of community contact. + +(a) Tha court shall require literals\* Supervision and surveillance for an offender placed into community control, which may Include but Is not limited to: + +- 1. Specified contact with the parole and probation officer. +- 2. Confinement to an agreed-upon residence during hours away from employmont and public service activities. +- 3. Mandatory public service. +- 4. Supervision by the Department of Corrections by means of an electronic monitoring device or system. +- 5. The standard conditions of probation set forth ins. 948.03. + +(b) For an offender placed on criminal quarantino communi'control, the court Celt require: + +- 1. Floctionic monitoring 24 hours per day. +- 2. Confinement to a designated residence dtai gna hours. + +(2) The enumeration of specific kinds of terms mn4Zlinditions does not prevent the court from adding thereto any other terms or conditions that The court considers proper. However, the sentencing court may only impose a condition of supervision allowing an offender convicted of s. 794.011, s. 800.04,s. 827.071, or s. 847.0145 to reside in another state if the order stipulates that it is contingent upon the approval of the receiving state interstate compact authority. The court may rescind or modify at any time the terms and conditions theretofore imposed by it upon the offender in community control. However, if the court withholds adjudication of guilt or imposes a period of incarceration as a condition of commuMty control, the period may not exceed 364 days, and incarceration shall be restricted to a county facility, a probation and restitution center under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections, a probation program drug punishment phase I secure residential treatment institution, or a community residential facility owned or operated by any entity providing such services. + +(3) The court mafplace a defendant who is being sentenced for criminal transmission of HIV in violation of s. 775.0877 on criminal quarantinecommunity control. The Department of Corrections shall develop and administer a criminal quarantine community control program emphasizing intensive supervision with 24-hour-pareciay electronic monitoring. Criminal • quarantine community control status must include surveillance and may include other measures normally associated with community control, except that specific conditions necessary to monitor this population may be ordered. + +1943.0435 Sexual offenders required to register with the department; penalty.-- + +(1) As used in this section, the term: + +(a)1. "Sexual offender" means a person who meets the criteria in sub-subparagraph a., sub-subparagraph b., sub-subparagraph c., or sub-subparagraph d., as follows: + +a. (i) Has been convicted of committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes in this state or similar offenses in another jurisdiction: s. 787.01, s. 787.02, or s. 787.025(2)(c), where the victim is a minor and the defendant is not the victim's parent or guardian; s. 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10); s. 794.05; s. 796.03; s. 796.035; s. 800.04; s. 825.1025; s. 827.071; s. 847.0133; s. 847.0135, excluding s. 847.0135(4); s. 847.0137; s. 847.0138; s. 847.0145; or s. 985.701(1); or any similar offense committed in this state which has been redesignated from a former statute number to one of those listed in this sub-sub-subparagraph; and + +(ii) Has been released on or after October 1, 1997, from the sanction imposed for any conviction of an offense described in sub-sub-subparagraph (i). For purposes of sub-sub-subparagraph (i), a sanction imposed in this state or in any other jurisdiction includes, but is not limited to, a fine, probation, community control, parole, conditional release, control release, or incarceration in a state prison, federal prison, private correctional facility, or local detention facility; + +b. Establishes or maintains a residence in this state and who has not been designated as a sexual predator by a court of this state but who has been designated as a sexual predator, as a sexually violent predator, or by another sexual offender designation in another state or jurisdiction and was, as a result of such designation, subjected to registration or community or public notification, or both, or would be if the person were a resident of that state or jurisdiction, without regard to whether the person otherwise meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender; + +c. Establishes or maintains a residence in this state who is in the custody or control of, or under the supervision of, any other state or jurisdiction as a result of a conviction for committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes or similar offense in another jurisdiction: s. 787.01, s. 787.02, or s. 787.025(2)(c), where the victim is a minor and the defendant is not the victim's parent or guardian; s. 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10); s. 794.05; s. 796.03; s. 796.035; s. 800.04; s. 825.1025; s. 827.071; s. 847.0133; s. 847.0135, excluding s. 847.0135(4); s. 847.0137; s. 847.0138; s. 847.0145; or s. 985.701(1); or any similar offense committed in this state which has been redesignated from a former statute number to one of those listed in this sub-subparagraph; or + +d. On or after July 1, 2007, has been adjudicated delinquent for committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses proscribed in the following statutes in this state or similar offenses in another jurisdiction when the juvenile was 14 years of age or older at the time of the offense: + +(i) Section 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10); + +(ii) Section 800.04(4)(b) where the victim is under 12 years of age or where the court finds sexual activity by the use of force or coercion; + +(IV) Suction re/D.04(5)(cl) where the court finds the use of force or coercion and unclothed genitals. + +2. for all qualifying offonses listed in sub-subparagraph (1)(a)l.d., the court shall make a written finding of the ago of the offender at the time of the offense. + +For each violation of a qualifying offense listed In this subsection, the court shall make a written finding of the age of the victim at the time of the offense. For a violation of s. 800.04(4), the court shall additionally make a writton finding indicating that the offense did or did hot invalvo sexual activity and indicating that the offense did or did not invoke) force or coercion. For a violation of s. e00.04(5), the court shall additionally make a written" finding that the offense did or did not involve unclothed genitals or genital area and that the offense did or did not envies the use of force or coercion. + +(b) "Convicted\* moans that there hors boon a determination of guilt re a result of a trial or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld, and includes an adjudication of delinquency of a juvenile as specified in this section. + +Conviction of a similar offerree includes, but is not limited to, a conviction by a federal or military tribunal, includirg courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forces of the United States, and includes a conviction or entry of a plea of guilty or note contests resulting in a sanction in any state of the United States or other jurisdiction. A sanction Includes, but is not limited to, a fine, probation, community control, parole, conditional release, wield release, or incarceration in a state prison, federal prison, private correctional. facility, or local detention fa:fifty. + +(c) 'Permanent resides-co' and "temporary residence" ilv the sane, meaning ascribed in s. 775.21. + +(d) -institution of higher education" means a career centre, community collage, college, state unieerejty, or independent postsecondary institution. + +(e) "Change in enrollment or employment status' mearc the commencement or termination of onrcebnorece employment via chaege ire loation of ontreireeet or erne:ego:et. + +(f) 'Electronic mail addressnes t same meaning as provided in s. 668.602. + +{g) 'instant message name moans an identifier that allows a person to communicate in real tine with another person using the Internet. + +(2) A sexual offender shale + +(a) Report in person at the sheriffs office: + +1. in the county in which the offender establishes or maintains a pecmwnnt or temporary residerco within 4t heirs after: + +a. .Establishine permanent or temporary residence in this state; or + +b. Being roe:based from tho custody, control, or supervision of the Department of Corrections or from the custody of a private correctional facility; or + +2, In the county where ho or she was convicted within 48 hours after being corrected for a qualifying offense for registration under this section if the offender is not in the custody or + +control of, or under the supervision of, the Department of Corrections, or is not in the custody of a private correctional facility. + +Any change in the sexual offender's permanent or temporary residence, name, any electronic mail address and any instant message name required to be provided pursuant to paragraph (4)(d), after the sexual offender reports in person at the sheriff's office, shall be accomplished in the manner provided in subsections (4), (7), and (8). + +(b) Provide his or her name, date of birth, social security number, race, sex, height, weight, hair and eye color, tattoos or other identifying marks, occupation and place of employment, address of permanent or legal residence or address of any current temporary residence, within the state and out of state, including a rural route address and a post office box, any electronic mail address and any instant message name required to be provided pursuant to paragraph (4)(d), date and place of each conviction, and a brief description of the crime or crimes committed by the offender. A post office box shall not be provided in lieu of a physical residential address. + +1. If the sexual offender's place of residence is a motor vehicle, trailer, mobile home, or manufactured home, as defined in chapter 320, the sexual offender shall also provide to the department through the sheriff's office written notice of the vehicle identification number; the license tag number; the registration number; and a description, including color scheme, of the motor vehicle, trailer, mobile home, or manufactured home. If the sexual offender's place of residence is a vessel, live-aboard vessel, or houseboat, as defined in chapter 327, the sexual offender shall also provide to the department written notice of the hull identification number; the manufacturer's serial number; the name of the vessel, live-aboard vessel, or houseboat; the registration number; and a description, including color scheme, of the vessel, live-aboard vessel, or houseboat. + +2. If the sexual offender is enrolled, employed, or carrying on a vocation at an institution of higher education in this state, the sexual offender shall also provide to the department through the sheriff's office the name, address, and county of each institution, including each campus attended, and the sexual offender's enrollment or employment status. Each change in enrollment or employment status shall be reported in person at the sheriff's office, within 48 hours after any change in status. The sheriff shall promptly notify each institution of the sexual offender's presence and any change in the sexual offender's enrollment or employment status. + +When a sexual offender reports at the sheriff's office, the sheriff shall take a photograph and a set of fingerprints of the offender and forward the photographs and fingerprints to the department, along with the information provided by the sexual offender. The sheriff shall promptly provide to the department the information received from the sexual offender. + +(3) Within 48 hours after the report required under subsection (2), a sexual offender shall report in person at a driver's license office of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, unless a driver's license or identification card that complies with the requirements of s. 322.141(3) was previously secured or updated under s. 944.607. At the driver's license office the sexual offender shall: + +(a) If otherwise qualified, secure a Florida driver's license, renew a Florida driver's license, or secure an identification card. The sexual offender shall identify himself or herself as a sexual offender who is required to comply with this section and shall provide proof that the sexual offender reported as required in subsection (2). The sexual offender shall provide any of the information specified in subsection (2), if requested. The sexual offender shall submit to the taking of a photograph for use in issuing a driver's license, renewed license, or identification card, and for use by the department in maintaining current records of sexual offenders. + +(b) Pay the costs assessed by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles for issuing or renewing a driver's license or identification card as required by this section. The driver's license or identification card issued must be in compliance with s. 322.141(3). + +(c) Provide, upon request, any additional information necessary to confirm the identity of the sexual offender, including a set of fingerprints. + +(4)(a) Each time a sexual offender's driver's license or identification card is subject to renewal, and, without regard to the status of the offender's driver's license or identification card, within 48 hours after any change in the offender's permanent or temporary residence or change in the offender's name by reason of marriage or other legal process, the offender shall report in person to a driver's license office, and shall be subject to the requirements specified in subsection (3). The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles shall forward to the department all photographs and information provided by sexual offenders. Notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in s. 322.142, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles is authorized to release a reproduction of a color-photograph or digital-image license to the Department of Law Enforcement for purposes of public notification of sexual offenders as provided in this section and ss. 943.043 and 944.606. + +(b) A sexual offender who vacates a permanent residence and fails to establish or maintain another permanent or temporary residence shall, within 48 hours after vacating the permanent residence, report in person to the sheriff's office of the county in which he or she is located. The sexual offender shall specify the date upon which he or she intends to or did vacate such residence. The sexual offender must provide or update all of the registration information required under paragraph (2)(b). The sexual offender must provide an address for the residence or other location that he or she is or will be occupying during the time in which he or she fails to establish or maintain a permanent or temporary residence. + +(c) A sexual offender who remains at a permanent residence after reporting his or her intent to vacate such residence shall, within 48 hours after the date upon which the offender indicated he or she would or did vacate such residence, report in person to the agency to which he or she reported pursuant to paragraph (b) for the purpose of reporting his or her address at such residence. When the sheriff receives the report, the sheriff shall promptly convey the information to the department. An offender who makes a report as required under paragraph (b) but fails to make a report as required under this paragraph commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. + +(d) A sexual offender must register any electronic mail address or instant message name with the department prior to using such electronic mail address or instant message name on or after October 1, 2007. The department shall establish an online system through which sexual offenders may securely access and update all electronic mail address and instant message name information. + +(5) This section does not apply to a sexual offender who is also a sexual predator, as defined in s. 775.21. A sexual predator must register as required under s. 775.21. + +(6) County and local law enforcement agencies, in conjunction with the department, shall verify the addresses of sexual offenders who are not under the care, custody, control, or supervision of the Department of Corrections in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 and any other federal standards applicable to such verification or required to be met as a condition for the receipt of federal funds by the state. Local law enforcement agencies shall report to the department any failure by a sexual offender to comply with registration requirements. + +![]()(7) A sexual offender who intends to establish residence in another state or jurisdiction other than the State of Florida shall report in person to the sheriff of the county of current residence within 48 hours before the date he or she intends to leave this state to establish residence in another state or jurisdiction. The notification must include the address, municipality, county, and state of intended residence. The sheriff shall promptly provide to the department the information received from the sexual offender. The department shall notify the statewide law enforcement agency, or a comparable agency, in the intended state or jurisdiction of residence of the sexual offender's intended residence. The failure of a sexual offender to provide his or her intended place of residence is punishable as provided in subsection (9). + +(8) A sexual offender who indicates his or her intent to reside in another state or jurisdiction other than the State of Florida and later decides to remain in this state shall, within 48 hours after the date upon which the sexual offender indicated he or she would leave this state, report in person to the sheriff to which the sexual offender reported the intended change of residence, and report his or her intent to remain in this state. The sheriff shall promptly report this information to the department. A sexual offender who reports his or her intent to reside in another state or jurisdiction but who remains in this state without reporting to the sheriff in the manner required by this subsection commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. + +(9)(a) A sexual offender who does not comply with the requirements of this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. + +(b) A sexual offender who commits any act or omission in violation of this section may be prosecuted for the act or omission in the county in which the act or omission was committed, the county of the last registered address of the sexual offender, or the county in which the conviction occurred for the offense or offenses that meet the criteria for designating a person as a sexual offender. + +(c) An arrest on charges of failure to register when the offender has been provided and advised of his or her statutory obligations to register under subsection (2), the service of an information or a complaint for a violation of this section, or an arraignment on charges for a violation of this section constitutes actual notice of the duty to register. A sexual offender's failure to immediately register as required by this section following such arrest, service, or arraignment constitutes grounds for a subsequent charge of failure to register. A sexual offender charged with the crime of failure to register who asserts, or intends to assert, a lack of notice of the duty to register as a defense to a charge of failure to register shall immediately register as required by this section. A sexual offender who is charged with a subsequent failure to register may not assert the defense of a lack of notice of the duty to register. + +(d) Registration following such arrest, service, or arraignment is not a defense and does not relieve the sexual offender of criminal liability for the failure to register. + +(10) The department, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Juvenile Justice, any law enforcement agency in this state, and the personnel of those departments; an elected or appointed official, public employee, or school administrator; or an employee, agency, or any individual or entity acting at the request or upon the direction of any law enforcement agency is immune from civil liability for damages for good faith compliance with the requirements of this section or for the release of information under this section, and shall be presumed to have acted in good faith in compiling, recording, reporting, or releasing the information. The presumption of good faith is not overcome if a technical or clerical error is made by the department, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Juvenile + +Justice, the personnel of those departments, or any individual or entity acting at the request or upon the direction of any of those departments in compiling or providing information, or if information is incomplete or incorrect because a sexual offender fails to report or falsely reports his or her current place of permanent or temporary residence. + +(11) Except as provided in s. 943.04354, a sexual offender must maintain registration with the department for the duration of his or her life, unless the sexual offender has received a full pardon or has had a conviction set aside in a postconviction proceeding for any offense that meets the criteria for classifying the person as a sexual offender for purposes of registration. However, a sexual offender: + +(a) 1. Who has been lawfully released from confinement, supervision, or sanction, whichever is later, for at least 25 years and has not been arrested for any felony or misdemeanor offense since release, provided that the sexual offender's requirement to register was not based upon an adult conviction: + +- a. For a violation of s. 787.01 or s. 787.02; +- b. For a violation of s. 794.011, excluding s. 794.011(10); +- c. For a violation of s. 800.04(4)(b) where the court finds the offense involved a victim under 12 years of age or sexual activity by the use of force or coercion; +- d. For a violation of s. 800.04(5)(b); +- e. For a violation of s. 800.04(5)(c).2. where the court finds the offense involved unclothed genitals or genital area; +- f. For any attempt or conspiracy to commit any such offense; or +- g. For a violation of similar law of another jurisdiction, + +may petition the criminal division of the circuit court of the circuit in which the sexual offender resides for the purpose of removing the requirement for registration as a sexual offender. + +2. The court may grant or deny relief if the offender demonstrates to the court that he or she has not been arrested for any crime since release; the requested relief complies with the provisions of the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 and any other federal standards applicable to the removal of registration requirements for a sexual offender or required to be met as a condition for the receipt of federal funds by the state; and the court is otherwise satisfied that the offender is not a current or potential threat to public safety. The state attorney in the circuit in which the petition is filed must be given notice of the petition at least 3 weeks before the hearing on the matter. The state attorney may present evidence in opposition to the requested relief or may otherwise demonstrate the reasons why the petition should be denied. If the court denies the petition, the court may set a future date at which the sexual offender may again petition the court for relief, subject to the standards for relief provided in this subsection. + +3. The department shall remove an offender from classification as a sexual offender for purposes of registration if the offender provides to the department a certified copy of the court's written findings or order that indicates that the offender is no longer required to comply with the requirements for registration as a sexual offender. + +![]()(b) As defined in sub-subparagraph (1)(a)l.b. must maintain registration with the department for the duration of his or her life until the person provides the department with an order issued by the court that designated the person as a sexual predator, as a sexually violent predator, or by another sexual offender designation in the state or jurisdiction In which the order was iSseed which states that such designation has been removed or demonstrates to the department that such designation, if not imposed by a court, has boon removed by operation of law or court order in the state or jurisdiction in which the designation was made, and provided such person no longer moats the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. + +(12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, especially those who have committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses even after being released from incarceration or commitment and that protection of the public from sexual olive:A:Re is a paramount government interest. CnYI kal offenders have a reduced expectation of privacy because of the public's interest in public safety and in the effective operation of government. Releasing information concerning sexual OftetrtiierStO law enforcement agencies and to persons who request such information, and the release of such information to the public by a law enforcement agency or public agency, will further the governmental interest of public snfoty. The designation of a parson as a sexual offender is not a sentence or a punishment but is simply the status of the offender which is the result of a conviction for having committed certain crimes. + +(13) Any person who has reason to believe that a sexual offender is not complying, or has not complied, with the requirements of this section and who, with the intent to assist the sexual offender in eluding a law enforcement agency that is seeking to find the Wei sal offender to question the sexual offender about, or to arrest the sexual offender for, his or her nontempliancoevith the requirements of this section: + +(a) Withholds information from, or does not notify, the law enforcement agency about the sexual offender's noncompliance with the requirements of this section, and, if known, the whereabouts of the sexual offender; p14/ 7 + +(b) Harbors, or attempts to harbor, or assists another person in harboring or attempting to harbor, the sexual offender; or + +(c) Conceals or attempts to conceal, or assists another person in concealing or attempting to concord, the sexual offender; or + +(d) Provides information to the law enforcement agency regarding the sexual offerxier that the person knows to be false information, + +commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided ins. 775.062, s. 775,063, or s. 778.084 + +(14)(a) A soXleat offender must report in person each Year during the month of the sexual offender's birthday and during the sixth month following the sexual offender's birth month to the sheriffs office in the county in which he or she resides or is otherwise located to reregister. + +(b) However, a sexual offender who is required to register as a result of a conviction for: + +1. Section 787.01 or s. 787.02 whore the victim is a minor and theoffendec is not the victim's parent or guardian; + +• .•:44, •:: s.: ;•ts . • •,t2r:s.l. ' • • • • • . • • + +2. Section 794.011 excluding s. 794.011(10); + +3. Section 800.04(4)(b) whore the court finds the offense involved a victim under 12 years of ago or sexual activity by the use of force or coercion; + +4. Section 800.04(5)(b);. + +5. Section 800.04(5)(c)1. where the court finds mobistation involving unclothed genitals or genital area;. + +6. Section 800.04(5)c.2. whore the court finds molestation inv.:king unclothed genitals or genital area; + +7. Section 800.04(5)(d) whore the court finds the use of force or coercion and unelot genitals or genital area; + +8. Any attempt or conspiracy to commit such offense; or + +9. A violation of a similar law of another jurisdiction, c + +must reregister each year during the month of the sexual of fencler's V ay and wary third ,fr.' • month thereafter. + +(c) the sheriffs office may determine the appropriate times and days for repotting by the sexual offenderaxtrich shall be consistent with tho reporting requirements of this subsection: Roregistration ainclude any changtc to the following information: + +1. Name; social security number; age; race; sex; date of birth; height; woight; hair and eye color, address of any permanent residence and address of any current temporary residence, within the state or out of state, including arural route address and a post office box; any electronic mail address and any instant message name required to be provided pursuant to Paregrech (4)(d); date and plate of any employment; vehicle make, modM, color, and license tag number; fingerprints; and photograph. A post office box tall not bo provided Lieu of a PhYtical residential address, + +2. If the sexual offender is arolled, employed, or carrying on a vocation at an institution of higher education in this state, the sexual offender shall also provide to the department the name, address, a county of each institution, including each campus attended, and the sexual offender's onro or employment status. + +3. if the sexual offender's place of residence is a motor vehicle, trailer, mobile home, or manufactured home as defined in chapter 320, the sexual offender shall also provide the , %abide identification number; the license tag number; the registration number; and a n as description, including color scheme, of the motor ',chide, trailer, mobile home, or • . 'lie. 47:9:;" • manufactured home. If the sexual offender's place of residence is a vessel, live-aboard sreistei ' or houseboat, aslifined in chapter 327, the sexual offender shall also provide the hull •••• si 4•• identification number; the manufacturer's serial number; the name of the wyzol, live-aboard . ; • . vasug, or houseboat; the registration number; and a description, imitating color scheme, of • the Vessel, live-aboard vessel or houseboat. + +• t . + +'IX. • + +4. Any sexual offender who fails to report in person as required at the sheriffs office, or who falls to respond to any address verification correspondence from the department within 3 weeks of the data of the correspondence or who fails to report electronic mail addresses or \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ada654065c9ed9f3828a8d2ccfa69a8ef3973729 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876/EFTA02762876.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1234 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762876.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 29, + "chars": 56729, + "elapsed_seconds": 23.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY S NOTICE OF FILING \nDOCUMENTS PRESENTED TO COURT AT R 5, 2017, HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.0654296875, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 531.0654296875, + 348.863037109375 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 348.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.259, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 397.5998229980469, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 397.5998229980469, + 219.09405517578125 + ], + [ + 210.259, + 219.09405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Terms of the Agreement:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.86, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 251.20199584960938, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 251.20199584960938, + 138.47406005859375 + ], + [ + 134.86, + 138.47406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVESTIGATION OF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.72699999999999, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 209.03300000000002, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 209.03300000000002, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 109.72699999999999, + 170.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.11399999999999, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.543, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.543, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 109.11399999999999, + 234.09 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Affirmation", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.07599999999996, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 327.342, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 327.342, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 277.07599999999996, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.69, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 460.56000000000006, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 460.56000000000006, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 69.69, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENTENCE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.298, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 108.474, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 108.474, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 50.298, + 320.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OTHER COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.298, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 227.25, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 227.25, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 50.298, + 450.36 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 282 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 566 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762876" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c29a5ed40a5d4e31316c83fc560f4ea49187455a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.md @@ -0,0 +1,5699 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +A( i ilk J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF FILING HEARIN RIPT of the attached November 29, 2017, hearing c set , 6)\* + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epste. "), hereby gives notice of the filing + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 6, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +# TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS + +DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017 + +TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m. + +PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C + +t Palm Beach, Florida + +BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept) + +Sonja D. + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +## APPEARANCES: + +For Plaintiff/Counter Defendant: + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE + +For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: A(I66A V + +SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART c& SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ES By , ESQUI + +0 + +For Jeffrey Epstein: + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBE R B,WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian A th, Suite 1400 West Palm Bead 3401 By JACK A. G9tp R, ESQUIRE + +For Jeffrey + +DARRE t!!,/gle INDYKE, PLLC 5 Le ngton Avenue York, NY 10022 N K. INDYKE, ESQUIRE + +THE COURT: We are here on Epstein versus Rothstein and . The two applicable parties being dealt with -- have a seat, please. Thank you. + +being Mr. Epstein and Mr. and the counterclaim brought by Mr. against Epstein relative to a malicious A(54r prosecution claim that has been brought IS' (::!' will confine our arguments to that particular matter. And we wil gee, in mind the following: Direct all arguments to the bench. Please d eak to each other. Please stay om any pejorative, unne ar comments as it relates, in ar, to the counter-de + +A÷° rdered that no remind you that the Court order I executed relative to the continuous r he trial on 14 November this year, replies be provided to the Court absent court order. You have violated my order. The replies are being ignored. I do not expect that to be repeated, absent sanctions. Is that understood? Both sides? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: If I need them, I will ask for them. I have several bankers boxes' worth of materials here. I don't need anything further unless I request it. + +I am well-advised in the case, as may or may not know. I think I anno this earlier, for whatever it's •I handled the underlying case ision AB. So I have had a long hi dealing with the matters that su e instant action. Let's s with the counter-defe in limine. revised omnibus motion + +> MR : May it please the Court. + +44,c THE COURT: Yes, sir. Thank you. + +0 MR. LINK: Thank you, Your Honor. We AT?hk now that we have provided you with a forest, maybe two forests, and we really appreciate your spending the time to go through it. + +> If you think back to the motion that we filed to continue -- and we appreciate Your + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +Honor giving us time to understand what this case is about. The reason we need this time and we need your time today is because we are not sure what case we're trying. And we have to understand what case we're trying, Judge, in order to determine what evidence should come in. + +So with Your Honor's permission, would like to just show you what I'v puJ up here, so -- + +THE COURT: Do you your PowerPoint? copy of + +MR. LINK: Yes + +THE COURT: ay have it. + +IIIIIIIKENBACH: IllimPid 7 Honor? I s r this with Mr. Scarola last I approach, Your eveningty + +S OMR. LINK: Your Honor, before we get the blowup and the screen, I would like to just take a minute and talk to you about what we think the evidentiary issues we have raised in our motion that have to be resolved. + +( THE COURT: Thanks. + +÷o + +1 2 3 4 know -- you have told us this over and over -- you know the elements of malicious prosecution, and that you know them well, and they're well-settled. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 But when you read the papers you will see there is a disagreement about what those S elements are. And so I just want to take moment to go through them and find out what we really need to understand be ore we can try this case to a jury is i what facts are in dispute that a .s to decide. That's our stru + +13 14 15 16 So, Your Honor, licious prosecution, ele o e, the commencement of a proceed tp t is not an issue in this case. + +17 18 19 1 two. Was it filed by the nt defendant -- the counter-defendant. an issue in this case. + +20 21 22 in Item three. The bona fide termination favor of the plaintiff. That is an issue in this case. + +23 24 25 That takes me to item two for one moment on my board, Your Honor, which is burden of proof. The counter-plaintiffs + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +suggest in their papers that once they prove the underlying claims by Mr. ' three plaintiffs that were settled in 2010, that they have met enough to go forward and skip by the bona fide termination. + +t(a tin 5 ""t\ shifts to us as -- : The reason the bona fide termination is important is that that is the one are the burden of proof -- the one area + +THE COURT: If I'm not mis m are we talking about bona fide ter of the Epstein action brought in versus Rothstein and Edwar + +MR. LINK: + +THE CO why are we dealing with the underl g.klaims of the bona fide termina issue? + +a re dealing with. LINK: I don't know why we are, (4;47., pt that is part of the papers that we + +THE COURT: They are part of the papers, as I understand it, so as to establish a nexus between the reason why Mr. Epstein brought this claim in the first place against Rothstein and , and to + +try to determine the rationale that Mr. Epstein had to bring this case in the first place, which is a question that the jury is going to have, which is a question that the Court has, and what was the reason behind bringing this case. + +Was it one of vengeance? hatred? Was it one of -- Was it one ARA , + +MR. LINK: Malicious. + +c 9 + +THE COURT: Malicious. get to the point. Was it one of f hat he was taking -- that the o those whose investments were ha y t as a result of that ve onzi scheme -- as he indicates in d osition -- he felt that these peopl w e taken advantage of as a result thstein's misdeeds? I don't what the reason was, and I'm sure the is going to ask what the reasons were. ut there is going to be some introduction, albeit it tempered -- clearly tempered -- + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: And Ms. Rockenbach -- I believe she was the signatory to the motion -- acknowledges that some of that 1 2 3 information is going to be in. There is no way we're going to be able to sanitize the case to that extent. + +4 5 MR. LINK: We wouldn't ask the Court to do that. + +6 7 8 THE COURT: So that's what I'm trying to understand. Why are we going there whet' it comes to bona fide termination? + +9 10 11 12 13 MR. LINK: The reason is that I wan to make sure that we are all on t sa.e page about whose burden of proof case, because that will make ence about the evidence that n come in. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 THE COURT: on' think there is any issue -- I d ieve Mr. Scarola is taking issu t t initially the burden of proof i h the counter-plaintiff the e was a bona fide termination of the ase in his client's favor -- this case, meaning Epstein versus Rothstein and determination or the showing that + +22 23 , and specifically Rothstein versus . Is that fair, Mr. Scarola? + +24 25 MR. SCAROLA: It's fair, Your Honor, that we acknowledge that we have the burden + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +of proof with regard to every element. + +It is also our position that the issue as to whether the underlying claim was bona fiably terminated in favor of + +is an issue of law for the Court. + +There are no disputed -- Mr. is present, yes. + +There are no disputed issues of fa with regard to what happened, and th ffre, the Court will need to make th determination as to whether onstitutes a bona fide termination e believe that that is an iss th as been resolved through the appe rocess as well. + +THE CO to the point where there's a b i f that the issue has been resolve ough the appellate process as agree with Mr. Scarola's position. + +this point, in my view, ultimately 't becomes potentially a legal issue. If the facts are clear and there's no factual dispute, then it becomes purely a legal decision as to whether or not there's been bona fide termination. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +100 percent. + +THE COURT: I don't want to deviate -- + +MR. LINK: I know. So I'm going to go to the next piece, which is the key, which is the absence of probable cause. And the absence of probable cause focuses here - the absence of probable cause and this 11\$:\Y what Your Honor was just talking about (2) focuses here. December 7th, 2009. at s when Mr. Epstein brought his c m gainst Rothstein, Mr. Rothstein's Mr. + +THE COURT: Di a H ng it against Rothstein's firm o y have Rothstein individually + +MR. S : Rothstein, individually and Bracy Edwards, individually. + +(cr. LINK: My apologies. + +OTHE COURT: etracked. It's Rothstein individually and , individually. Mr. Scarola concurred and Mr. Link has now concurred. That statement is + +MR. SCAROLA: And L.M., which I think is of some significance also. + +4 5 6 7 8 Here is our view of what we have to do when we look at the evidence we are going to show you -- the exhibit list, the testimony to come in -- is to focus on what the jury is going to have to decide. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0 Again, I'm not sure what the fa C is t re in dispute, but it's here. Th information that makes a di is what Epstein -- what Epstein at; what he considered; the inf e drew from that information; an ther when you take the totality of ormation, Your Honor, he had a reaso b basis to bring a civil proceed gainst Mr. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 I don't think there is any dispute. I read the Court's transcript where the ourt has said -- the case against Mr. Rothstein, I understand that. I don't think anybody is disputing that. The question is was there sufficient -- + +24 25 THE COURT: Hold on. Hold on a minute. Let's not take my comments out of context. + +originally? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +MR. LINK: She was, Judge. + +Ask' + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Whether or not there was ever any issues that Mr. Epstein had viably against either Rothstein, or L.M. are still, as far as the Court is concerned, unanswered. + +MR. LINK: Remember we have a default against Mr. Rothstein. + +THE COURT: That's a different issue.ActIlSr + +MR. LINK: I understand your point 0 Judge. + +C.) + +THE COURT: I don't want ents to be taken out of context. + +MR. LINK: Fair en + +A + +THE COURT: is different than a court indicati e type of understandin Mr. Epstein's cause of action againothstein in this particular case. se, as I said, the jury will ion and the Court continues to question Mr. Epstein irst place. brought this case in the + +MR. LINK: Fair enough. Thank you for the clarification. + +THE COURT: And the reason why that's important is because the counter-plaintiff has argued that circumstantially -- and + +not as a legal term, but mo art. Because while Mr. Epstein may have his own motivation, circumstantially it is goiPic' to be up to the plaintiff to prove that O motivation was not, in fact, in good fai h. And I'm using good faith not as a rm - term of + +> MR. LINK: I u rs d that. + +it brings us to the point that w ed to get to. So I am with you so far rms of where you're going. And you eading me through this. I ciate it very much. THE COURT: + +0 But it does get us now to this really A÷c ritical issue of, well, again, there's this huge question that's being asked by -- going to be asked by the finder of fact and the trier of the law, and that is, how does the counter-plaintiff prove its case when Mr. Epstein has answered selected questions? + +based upon, in large part, invocation of the Fifth Amendment by Mr. Epstein, they are going to need to prove that or disprove that potentially through the Fifth Amendment issues that we are going to be discussing. + +I was -- I am now paraphrasing Mr. Epstein's answers in large part. I found out that Rothstein was factoring these cases. i found out that these investors were being taken advantage of. Taken advantage of through the forging of an order -- forging of an order that purporte to have the signature of Judge Marra tremendously well-respected jurist i4 th4s community, now taken senior st + +I, meaning Mr. Epstein .t only concerned about Rothste what he did, but also I had susp at Mr. was involved in ocess, because there were some ar es hat discussed the query could Roths have done this alone, and Vell implica a t least the cases -- not to my edge Mr. -- but the cases that was serving as lead counsel. + +ome before this particular court in division AB back in 2009 and that period of time -- perhaps just around that period of time. + +So there's going to be a large question in the trier-of-facts' mind and remains in + +4 5 the Court's mind. How was Mr. Epstein damaged by what transpired from the standpoint of Rothstein, or what may have transpired from his own mind as it relates to Mr. + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +That's going to be a huge question, and remains a huge question. What was Epstein doing at that time, meaning, why did he this lawsuit? What was his damages? was he even doing this in the lace? That's going to create an i + +And the reason I br i¢ i up is solely to get into the arg at's going to be raised by the co aintiff And that is e prove this where Epstein cho to answer only certain questio garding his motivation, i.e., and probable cause? + +0 But it doesn't answer questions germane ÷o his mindset that, okay, there were these factored cases by Rothstein. He's paying a severe price for what he did. + +> The millionaire investors who got involved in this Ponzi scheme have clearly been damaged and restitution has been paid, + +to my understanding, to the extent that those assets of Rothstein's and those who were otherwise implicated paid what they paid. + +But how is Mr. Epstein damaged, and what was his motivation -- other than altruism, other than the questions that asked by Mr. Scarola, which he didn't answer -- that could have been refer myriad of things: vengeance, a hostility. But they have t ity -- in my respectful view, in these materials -- to be raise those issues and perha hrough the Fifth Amendment Av + +MR. LI Maybe, Your Honor. + +: We need to concentrate on And we need to not only look I'm trying to say is, through Rockenbach's excellent written at presentation + +MR. LINK: I helped a little bit, Judge. + +THE COURT: Actually, Mr. Link signed it. + +MR. LINK: There you. I took credit for it all, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: My apologies. + +MR. LINK: It was a little bit of me. + +THE COURT: We get in trouble when we assume. Irrespective of that, Mr. Link signed it. So you can tell I'm more concentrated on the body of work than w necessarily executed it. + +But what I am trying to s what I believe respectfully is bei here is it's a one-sided argume A + +Now, I agree t ave to zealously represent your c t and take his side, and I have no pr th that. But what I'm also sugges is, at the same time, there has to me consideration and some ssion that they have a viable -- I t say viable claim -- but they have iable arguments to support what they are trying to accomplish. And the means to do that is largely hamstrung by Mr. Epstein's refusal to answer questions. + +Go ahead. + +Those are exactly the issues we have. And there's one thing, Your Honor, I think that I would ask you to consider. This is very important. And I will tell you that if you walk through these elements, this element right here -- this is the key -- the absence of probable cause does not take in, consideration anybody's motive, their a their malice, their state of mind or anything else other than - and we will get to maliciou dead-on -- but probable objective standard. ens an facts are not in dispute, it's a ect'ive standard to be determined b ourt. That's what the Florida Sup Court has told us. + +'s important -- what's tant is the counter-plaintiff doesn't lenge that this information was ÷ vailable. They don't challenge that the information, when read, it says Rothstein was involved in a Ponzi scheme. It says Mr. Epstein's three cases were being used to lure investors and information about them was fabricated. + +So there's not a dispute about that. The question is this. The question is, did Mr. Epstein have some reason to doubt or not believe the information he was reading. Because even though probable cause, Your Honor, is an objective standard, if I know what I'm reading is false, then I haven't really in good faith relied on it. + +0 But it doesn't matter. The cas C la says you cannot establish prob ause or the lack of it by the most alice known to man. + +I can hate thi en man. I can want to bury this ge an. I can want to run him out of es But if I have objective pb le cause -- + +: And you are saying, as a r of law, you are suggesting to me that paper articles -- which are the bulk of reliance that Mr. Epstein is suggesting -- is sufficient to establish probable cause? + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir, I am. + +THE COURT: We are really not there yet because -- + +MR. LINK: I know we're not. + +THE COURT: -- this isn't a motion for summary judgment. + +MR. LINK: It's not. But I wanted to answer the Court's question. + +I think it's really important, Judge, as we go forward, that we differentiate thi element of probable cause and the eleme malice. Because you are exactly rig When you get to item five, mal hat's his intent to hurt Mr. Edwa at is absolutely relevant for ts 3, y determination. No . Okay. It is. But it is not re nt whether there was a lack of pr e ause. balance tha w1 have here because -- And that's a + +: what's not relevant in the ce of probable cause? Are you talking t malice? + +MR. LINK: Malice. Intent. We will show you cases, Your Honor, where it says if you have probable cause and you have malice, there's no claim for malicious prosecution. You only look at malice once you've established probable cause. You can't use + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +malice to establish probable cause. You can, on the other hand, use probable cause to establish malice. + +THE COURT: I understand. + +MR. LINK: That makes sense? + +THE COURT: I understand you completely. + +MR. LINK: The reason that's impor is because if you combine -- if you What's in his mind? How is he yi g to hurt this guy? When he's r the Razorback complaint, th ttorney's statement, and the rs articles that are out there, are combining malice and probable + +So, th what we have to avoid. It's really r acal, and here is why. + +A;By the way, i want for the Court to I really appreciate the hard work that A ?Mr. ll ' team has put in. They did a lot of writing. We did a lot of writing. We have crystalized the issues for this Court's determination. + +> So one of the things that Mr. tells us in his response to our motion in + +4 5 limine, he wants to tell us how he's going to try this case. And here is what he says. n starts by proving the truth of the claims he brought on behalf of his three clients." + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +That evidence, Your Honor, if this case hadn't settled, would absolutely have been'S relevant to that trial, without a questnn + +he material. h nothing that's in their mind or happened to them that can have uenced Mr. Epstein when he was reading + +THE COURT: So what you're suggesting, though, Mr. Link, is that there could never be a successful plaintiff in a malicious prosecution case. + +Every -- I shouldn't say every many of the questions that were ask Mr. Epstein that he took th- to very well could have been re o this lawsuit, okay? B t th of the allegations that are making has nothing to d hat Mr. Epstein reviewed in 2009 bef e brought the suit. + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 that at all. I will give you an example. What if this lawsuit was filed and there were two articles that existed that said that Mr. had nothing to do with the Ponzi scheme. And Mr. Epstein, in looking at the information that was available, took that information -- or he knew Mr. wasn't involved at all i y -- an not telling you that Mr. was(L)am saying based on the informatio a hat time -- + +12 13 14 THE COURT: where information, by the way, that sugest r had involvement? + +15 16 MR. LINK: information that suggests thioltpL had involvement is this. + +17 18 19 20 MS ach? I have a copy that might be er for the Court. I shared this with AleM r. Scarola yesterday. Your Honor, may I + +21 22 23 24 25 MR. LINK: Your Honor asked a great question. It is without a doubt nothing in the press or the U.S. Attorney's office or anywhere else that comes out before Mr. Rothstein goes down that connects + +hen Mr. was a sole practitioner. ?SIn y the litigation against you, you t to see things that are different from + +THE COURT: Freeze that phrase for a moment. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: When you think about the litigation that was brought against you -- + +directly Mr. to the Ponzi scheme. It does not. + +So what we have to then look at is this information. So you have as your backdrop -- put yourself in Mr. Epstein's shoes for a minute. You have as a backdrop your reading that the three cases that you, have are being used to solicit investor and you're being told that you have lre dy offered a \$30 million settleme ich was untrue. That you've alread to pay \$200 million, which was That there were 50 other claim there at the Rothstein firm, h sJere untrue. And you read all of d then you start thinking ab t hat's happened in the litigat q against you. + +4 THE COURT: Very well. + +5 6 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. That's what I'm talking about. + +7 8 THE COURT: I want to make sure that iS that is what you're saying. + +9 MR. LINK: We're on the same pa e. + +10 ' clients versus Mr. Eps + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mr. '4'e4 see many different things that happened. And you look at the ti is at Roths d that - this is really the question. nk it's a legal question. The (^ q io is, was there sufficient s you to think there could be fi Was there sufficient informa that you could draw a reasonable ence from that would allow you to bring vil claim? And here is what we see. We + +21 22 23 24 25 So, for example, all of a sudden you have Mr. and his team saying they want to depose Donald Trump, Bill Clinton. And there wasn't any testimony from the three folks that Mr. represented + +when you are saying what Mr. brought against Mr. Epstein, correct? + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +0 + +4 5 6 7 8 9 The three folks that Mr. represented never said they were on one of hours deposing Mr. Epstein's pilot Ad ijir Mr. Epstein's planes, yet they spent 12 and didn't ask a single question about Mr. clients. + +10 11 12 13 He had a state court case on behalf of L.M. He then fil -page federal court complaint '0-and-some counts that he neve + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 He then file ion for fraudulent transfer in a ral case saying Mr. Epstein raudulently transferring assets, lists in there all these assets And Judge Marra denies it and says was brought without any evidence hatsoever. + +21 22 23 24 25 So if you look at these things that happened, and you now have them in the context of, wait a minute, I just read that Rothstein was telling folks that these cases were worth \$500 million, and Mr. Epstein has + +that they had any contact with Mr. Clinton or Mr. Trump, or any of the other folks that they said they wanted to depose. + +(.5 94 v + +÷f riends Mr. Epstein, THE COURT: But couldn same information, Mr. Link counter-plaintiff a s it might serve whi rea es a potentially classic jury s '. n? And that is, that all of thes ngs that were done -- the inconve ing of his pilots, the veniencing of his high-level friends, implications of these high-level all of these things that were done to anger Mr. Epstein at or around the time, if my memory serves, when these cases were being settled -- doesn't that serve them just as well to create an issue of probable cause as it does your client to + +already offered \$200 million. And that's not enough. We are going to get more. + +If you are Mr. Epstein, you start thinking, Well, was all of this stuff being done to generate information to show the investors in the Ponzi scheme? Then we know that the flight logs that came from the pilots, that had nothing to do with the 0 three plaintiffs that Mr. us d wire used by Rothstein to show inves + +say, well, all of these things were done? + +And it then gets us back to what I earlier asked, and that is, even if that's taken as true, even if Rothstein was pumping these cases up and claiming to these investors that it was then publicly known through primarily the press, media was swarming -- as they should have been this absolute criminal act, the like which, from an economic standpo' from a private individual, perhaps 11 never been seen before, other, New York. A\ Madoff in A s + +But the poi ' rying still gets m o that same question. Yeah, Mr. E tt in may have been angry, he may hay n concerned about his friends, igh-level people that he associated and how this could drag him down as ell as them. to make is, it Certainly a bona fide concern, perhaps. + +But then it gets to the question, yeah, with all of that, it still gets me to my original question and what the jury is going to be asking, more importantly, how was + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Mr. Epstein damaged as a result of this activity? + +MR. LINK: May I answer that question? But then I have to weave back, because you gave me something I have got to talk about. + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. LINK: The damage that he felt --,< now, let's keep in mind what case we're 0 trying today -- or will be trying whi h is whether there was probable c to go forward. + +THE COURT: Agains wards? + +MR. LINK: Aga' . We are not trying the c ainst Mr. . We don't have t ho o would have won that case. So King to get back to that in a t sec. 'llir + +What he thought his damages were at the his real dollar damages is that he was pending money paying lawyers to defend what was happening during this Rothstein period. + +And so if you connect the dots and say, okay -- you said it better than I did, Judge. Rothstein is doing these criminal activities, which included using my name, + +1 three legitimate lawsuits -- + +2 THE COURT: Who is my? + +3 MR. LINK: Mr. Epstein. + +4 THE COURT: Okay. + +5 MR. LINK: I keep trying to make you + +6 Mr. Epstein for my example. It's the only + +7 way it works for me. + +8 If you're Mr. Epstein and you see O + +9 Judge, you see what's in the press a + +10 your -- I want to make this cl We have + +11 never challenged when Mr. E lied them + +12 legitimate that he didn't have a g + +13 basis to do so back D That's not + +14 this case i out. what + +15 But in d . ' you're Mr. Epstein and + +16 you see all f his information and you look + +17 at what ppening here and you say, Have I + +18 legal fees, paid my lawyers in order + +19 ave to defend activity that was really + +20 esigned not to benefit the three + +21 A÷ci plaintiffs, but to let Rothstein take it and + +22 show investors? + +23 And we know, as a matter of fact, + +24 Judge, that Rothstein did it. He used + +25 bankers boxes from the Epstein cases. He + +Ask + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +used flight manifests from the Epstein cases. So he actually used the information that was provided to him by Mr. to show investors. + +This is going to answer your question. This is key. I think I remember your question. This is key, if I remember your question. You said what if Mr. a legitimate purpose? I believe Mr.%dwfrds can get on the stand and persu Judge, he had a reasonable 'or doing everything he did. + +THE COURT: k that question. + +MR. LINK: ou said what if he had a legiti is? What he was doing was trying Dnefit the three folks. + +: No. What I said was, n't that information that you just cated to me that forms the basis for Epstein allegedly bringing this suit, could that not be -- could that not be utilized by Mr. to submit to the fact that -- submit the fact that the reason why Epstein brought this suit in the first place was one of trying to get back at + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +for inconveniencing his friends, for dragging those friends -- high-level friends into the process, for inconveniencing his pilots? All of these things that I brought out. That was the point that I made. + +A MR. LINK: What element of the claim is that for? What element? That's malice. It's not probable cause. What Mr. thought, what he did, why he did it nothing to do with probable ca e. It may have, Your Honor, a lot to malice. + +THE COURT: I thin great deal to do with probable quite frankly. I think it's a mi a so to speak, when you get to p cause and malice. + +I agre h you that probable cause has to there oven before malice. But I are -- certainly, in a case which is an extremely unusual and c omplex matter that there are lead-overs, if you will, as it relates to probable cause and the malice elements. And I don't think it can be disputed here. This is not like the simple cases that we read in Florida Jurisprudence that deal with malicious think like + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +prosecution the more simple concrete-type of cases that sets one plaintiff against one defendant. This is different. + +And I think that the issue of malice and probable cause are going to be somewhat congealed and somewhat of a lead-over from probable cause to malice. Not vice versa. I understand the parameters legally in regard. + +MR. LINK: I agree with e ing you just said except -- without s. ng the wrath of the Court -- dispute the first part you said ca I don't believe, Your Honor, that Ia is, what's in Mr. - what's in Mr. Epstein's mind about easons for bringing the case, h nything to do with probable I think they have everything to do a malice. + +And the law is very clear. You can't use malice to demonstrate probable cause. So if you can't use malice, what difference does it make how much Mr. Epstein may have hated Mr. and wanted to do him harm? + +1 2 pausing, and I wanted to raise a procedural question. If you are pausing -- + +3 4 MR. LINK: No problem. I never know when I'm pausing either. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: I have the same problem. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Your Honor, I'm a little bit confused about the direction that that argument is taking, because I thought we were argui motion in limine to exclude evidence once there's a concession that 4 vidence is relevant to malice, even ccept and I don't -- that it' levant to probable cause, i nt and it comes in. + +15 16 17 18 "eS So I su hat, since we have had an on-the-reco o6ncession of the relevance of the evitle that part of the argument is + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OTHE COURT: Well I think Mr. Link -- I 7\a m giving him latitude, because I interrupted him to ask these questions that really needed to be answered from my standpoint. And as I look at these cases that are going to trial, I also try to put myself, not in either parties' shoes, but + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +certainly in juries' shoes when it comes to questions that they're going to have, and that really needs to be answered, because it helps me to narrow the issues as well. So I appreciate your courtesies in that respect. + +MR. LINK: My pleasure, Your Honor. + +'IS THE COURT: Let's go ahead -- and if could, let's get to the core issues thaC4..) we're dealing with today and see whe (:. e w are, because Mr. Scarola also a good point. I mean, a lot of th' ial that seems to be a matter of tion when it comes to excluding timony or this evidence, it's e 40k7etia ly been conceded that most of s idence is going to be relevant. + +MR : I didn't say that. I want very clear. I did not say that the ence that he wants to submit or the uestions he asked or the exhibits that he listed should come in on malice. What I said to the court is that Mr. Epstein's state of mind and how much he would have disliked Mr. or wanted to hurt him would be relevant to malice. That's very + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +different than asking the question about do you have a preference for minor children. + +THE COURT: So if we can, move now to issues of evidence that is being sought to be limited in terms of its introduction to the jury. + +MR. LINK: Yes, Your Honor. My partnA ,S , Ms. Rockenbach will handle that. + +0 And, Your Honor, just so the Co rt' aware, Ms. Rockenbach has a pro -es onalism meeting at Mr. Scarola's of -t starts at noon. Do you mind b at 11:45? + +THE COURT: Th e. I have a court luncheon, with my colleagues down in the ci dining room at noon, so that's not blem. + +CH: Your Honor, I would to take the first issue in the bus -- revised omnibus motion in limine. + +But before we talk about Fifth Amendment, I just want cite one case to Your Honor before we leave this arena of probable cause. + +When I was reviewing the case law in preparation for this hearing, I chuckled to + +4 5 6 7 think that the Florida Supreme Court in 1926 called this an ancient action, malicious prosecution. But it is that very case that answers a point that Your Honor was just discussing. I'm talking about the Brothers case. And it says in Brothers -- + +8 9 THE COURT: Do you have a tab numb for me? + +10 11 12 41!) MS. ROCKENBACH: The tab is -- I 4 don't know that actually. ' t be able to get that. + +13 14 15 THE COURT: If your binder, I can probably fin , ou did a good job with your -- + +16 MS. : The index. + +17 18 ; 9 T: -- index. Yeah. I don't h a acT Brothers by that first name. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 MS. ROCKENBACH: I apologize, Your onor. It's at 92 Florida 278, and it's published in 1926. The court said it is well established that want of probable cause cannot be inferred from malice, however great such malice may be, even the most express malice. + +1 2 3 4 So before we leave that arena, that case back in 1926 said that you can't go backwards. You can't find malice then infer probable cause. + +5 6 7 8 THE COURT: I understand. I am just making a point that, in this set of unusual A facts, it's not necessarily a clear-cut distinction that can be drawn. + +9 10 11 But again, sometimes facts will cre te these types of issues and they different than the 1926 set \1 + +12 But go ahead. + +13 e(1 ir MS. ROCREN BACH . ThS is true. + +14 15 16 17 18 So, Your Ho e first issue about the Fifth Am I want to be clear that with regard o robable cause, my client has an orig complaint that was filed against M dwards in December of 2009. + +19 20 21 0 He obviously didn't raise any Fifth A+Am endment with regard to any allegations that he filed in public court. + +22 23 24 25 He also filed two affidavits. Did not raise any Fifth Amendments with regard to the statements and facts that he alleged in those affidavits, one in 2013; and then the + +most recent, 2013. + +There's a pending motion to strike the 2017 set for these pending motion hearings. + +There was never any type of attack on the 2013 affidavit and they are substantially the same. + +The third issue about substantive testimony that my client gave that goes the probable cause issue were the tw depositions in which Mr. Scaro Mr. Epstein. And that firs March 17, 2010 -- and i he court file -- it was appr ma iy three hours. And it's importa r Honor, just if the Court would g me to read a few answers, be u the point here is -- I t.IV should started with this. If I may use th~ as osed + +O So really there were two categories of uestions that were asked of my client by Mr. Scarola. Some pertain to Fifth Amendment, which he raised, and some pertain to the malicious prosecution action. + +My client substantively answered in that March 17, 2010 deposition -- under the + +column of malicious prosecution -- page 19, Mr. Scarola asked, "Your complaint in this action" -- he's referring to the malicious prosecution action -- "alleges that L.M. made claims for damages out of proportion to alleged damages. What does that mean?" + +"It means what it says." + +Mr. Scarola: "I don't understand Explain it to me." + +questions related to his pr C S. n Mr. Epstein substantively red cause for instituting the civil pry g of ave read in settled cases for \$200 million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of serious sums of money, which is outrageous." malicious prosecuti - "I believe that as part of sc 'eme to defraud investors in lorida out of millions of dollars, ms of outrageous sums of money wade on behalf of alleged victims s the board, and the only way, in fact, t Rothstein sits in jail. And what I the paper, claims that I + +He answers the questions, "Have you settled claims?" "Yes, I have." + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Page 23 of the same deposition. My client substantively answers the probable cause question for why he brought -- and Your Honor asked the question -- why did Mr. Epstein file this malicious prosecution action? He told Mr. Scarola back in 2010 -- AS 1 on page 23, Mr. Scarola said, "Did Brad do anything that he shouldn't h done that forms the basis of your la sui against him?" + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +"Yes, many things." c + +"List them for me , + +"He has gone t he dia out of, I believe, an atte to gin up these allegations. contacted the media. He has use media for his own purposes. He has ght discovery. He has engaged in very proceedings that bear no -tionship to any case filed against me by ny of his clients. + +Acs\a "His firm, which he is the partner of, has been accused of forging a federal judge's signature." + +> Those are but two -- just two that I have taken and the Court has indulged me in + +1 reading substantive answers. + +2 3 4 5 6 7 THE COURT: Believe me, I have read these over and over again. They're segregated in various motions that I have been privy to, and I also have read the transcript in full relative to Mr. Epstein's questions. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 The point that I tried to make wits , Mr. Link was that, number one, if as C a c urt as a system of jurisprudence, sly rely upon the contentions of the endant in a malicious prosecution s to probable cause, then there w lly be, essentially -- t would be no malicious prosecution at would be brought. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 Second understand that it is the plainti burden of proof. Now, if it's a legal question, the Court will deal r that accordingly. But at least for now understand that it's the plaintiff's burden to prove as to probable cause. + +22 23 24 25 The point that I made and tried to make with Mr. Link was if a defendant in a malicious prosecution claim -- and I think some of these cases speak essentially to + +that issue -- takes the Fifth Amendment in similar types of cases, then the plaintiff's position will never really be made known, unless there's an introduction to some degree of the fact that to certain the likelihood is I am not going to questions -- now graphic sexual questions, allow those into evidence. + +Co + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Understood. + +THE COURT: I haven't hear Mr. Scarola, so I don't wan •gest that I am prejudging anythin there is a bar that we need to as it relates to the difference bac en. 'relevant evidence and a 403. I ge + +But at same time, I think as the judge, posed to an advocate, and taking consideration both sides' positions, I to recognize that there is a definitive A÷a nd direct correlation between the invocation of Fifth Amendment rights as to issues that would go to proof of probable cause relating to the plaintiff's claim, and not simply take Mr. ' (sic) contentions at face value. Because in + +1 2 3 circumstances, such as this one where the Fifth Amendment has been discussed -- and in the vast majority of cases has -- + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Did I misstate something? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. You said + +Mr. . You meant Epstein, I'm sure. + +So the record is clear, I thought it AdA r appropriate to correct that. + +THE COURT: We have all made th(s;594 ' mistakes. I knew it was going pen. I apologize for it. I caught once before. I apologize. + +Madam Court Re could you just read back where arted with questioning Mr. Rockenba se? + +(There the requested portion of the re was read back by the reporter as (above duly recorded.) + +0 THE COURT: With the vast majority of ases that have dealt with this tension, the allowance on a limited basis of the invocation of the Fifth Amendment makes perfect sense, because logically it is a way for the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution claim -- to be able + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +to prove the case -- at least prove probable cause. It makes sense. + +And if I can divine common sense from these cases, then I feel I have made some reasonably decent strides. But it makes sense. I don't know if you can really argue with that logic. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I don't, Your Hon + +There's a caveat. We agree with the and we would rely on two cases his point, because we are talki -- the reason I drew that line th Amendment and malicious prose about whether Mr wards can, in this malicious pr t' n case, to the jury my client took the Fifth Amendmet400 and draw a negative inference t14from. read s we're talking questions + +0 The US Supreme Court in Baxter hat's the case -- that's the Fifth Amendment case it says, "It's key that there's independent evidence existing of the fact to which the parties refuse to answer." + +S" + +That's one building block for this issue. The second building block is a + +Fourth DCA decision called Frazier versus Security and Investments, 1993. What does Frazier tell us? Not only do we build off the US Supreme Court and say you have to have independent evidence in order to use this Fifth Amendment adverse inference, but Frazier says that this adverse inference i, limited against parties when they refus testify in response to probative evi offered against them. Probati dence offered against them. + +We looked at those ings earlier. This lawsuit here 1 e ring involving -- I a in to say them all wrong -- E.W and Jane Doe. It's not. This is the cious prosecution ring and suit. + +?S ,o Epstein's deposition to Your Honor is to how that he didn't take the Fifth Amendment on issues relevant to why he filed the malicious -- why he filed his civil proceeding, the underlying suit for this malicious prosecution case against the reason I read some excerpts from + +÷ + +1 questions. + +2 3 4 5 6 What he didn't answer were questions that would fall in the Fifth Amendment column that would be relevant in those three claimants' lawsuits or claims or criminal action. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 In that substantive three-hour AS AY Isy deposition taken of my client, he was a "How many children have you sexually abused?" Have you ever sexual sed children? Have you ever so with - and then he was asked a p lic figures -- the gove ew Mexico? + +14 15 16 17 18 19 "On how man ca ions did you solicit prostitution ow any prostitutes do you contend you oo icited? How many minors have you pro for prostitution. These are many times did you engage ral sex with females under age 18?" ions -- How + +20 21 22 23 24 25 These have no relevance to the malicious action. And those are the very questions that we are asking Your Honor to not only preclude from being admitted to into evidence or any reference in the malicious prosecution, but also to preclude + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Mr. from using the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when those very questions have, A, no probative value in this lawsuit, no probative evidence, whatsoever; and B, there is no independent evidence -- + +THE COURT: I knew you all worked very hard in having produced these materials you all got involved somewhat late i game, but what I didn't get is de initive list of questions and answe are sought to be excluded. + +Globally, as I inclination i t o allow those types of questions ~~,~nel sked to be utili -- to be published to the jury. my ted, and thus far, of Mr. Epstein or + +However, questions that deal with the that suits were brought against + +Epstein by at least the three people that were brought -- other suits that were brought against Mr. Epstein either by minors or by women of age that were actually filed or claims that were made and were paid by Mr. Epstein, those types of questions, I + +1 2 3 4 believe, are going to be of probative value, which is essentially relevance, defined as tending to prove or disprove a material fact. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +g ut THE COURT: What I would percei Ce t being the probative issue or t re evance gets to why Mr. Epstein bro s claim in the first place. A estion, as I mentioned before, t jury is going to have and the Cou and for them to be hamstrung fr g those questions, flies in the face a far as I'm concerned, of the majorit the cases that I have read that on these types of cases. They may not specific malicious prosecution case, the logic still is maintained. You see? + +What's the material fact? You can answer it or I will answer it. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I have a question fo Your Honor. But go ahead. O + +It can be differentiated -- some of these graphic questions that I'm not going to repeat here, but are a matter of public record and are in the materials far more graphic than what you have given us as + +1 2 3 exemplars -- and I respect the fact that you didn't need to bring those into the record today. + +4 5 6 But what I am saying is that it goes back into the logic that I described earlier. + +7 8 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor mentioned two categories -- + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 O THE COURT: And I'm not excuc, for a moment. I apologize for I a But I'm not trying to be defini far as the categories that are, nng o be or not be allowed. What I' tr.erfg to give you is some type of glo a spective, because, as I said befo tunately, whether it's time or what/ it may have been, the questio o my knowledge, have not been gated out. So as to go through on a tion-by-question basis, yes or no. That ay have to be done at a later time. + +21 22 23 24 25 But what I'm trying to do is indicate to you that from a jury perspective, they are going to need to know what fueled potentially, Mr. Epstein. Was it what he says, or at least from a circumstantial + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +standpoint, and based upon his refusal to answer questions germane to those three pseudonym -- the pseudonyms used by those plaintiffs and others who have brought claims -- I don't think those three cases, to my recollection, were the only three cases that were brought -- maybe by Mr. + +awyers? Is that what you're going to suggest? TH\$ JRT: Are you going to tell me -- part of -- Mr. Epstein did not g any cases against any of the other + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Number one, that is true and correct and accurate. He did not. And those other cases -- any other claims that were not being represented by + +II. ROCKENBACH: They were the ones brought by Mr. %at leads me to the point -- I was g ump back with Your Honor and say identified two categories and you d s potentially relevant and pro ve o discuss those three that w three lawsuits and others. + +I + +Mr. , they have no relevance to Mr. Epstein's lawsuit that he brought in December of 2009. + +THE COURT: You can argue that. I have no problem with that argument. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: But, Your Honor, as you've recognized, Your Honor is the gatekeeper. And introducing evidence t has absolutely no probative value an relevance would be very harmfu inflammatory and clearly pr my client from -- + +THE COURT: I t er4nd the point. You can proceed. 'gale + +> MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. + +'77 MR. LINK Your Honor, can I offer a suggest ased on what I have heard? + +44S THE r COURT: Any objection, Mr. Scarola? + +MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. + +0 + +THE COURT: Yes, sir. + +MR. LINK: Your Honor raises a good point, which is, without the specific questions in front of you, it makes it more difficult. + +scrambled up until 10 o'clock the night before Thanksgiving. + +THE COURT: That's why I wasn't criticizing anybody for not having -- + +MR. LINK: And we didn't take it that way, Judge. + +But I do think it would be helpful foS the Court and for the parties if we go O through the questions and the answerC- there's not that many of them, 4ly - and have the Court make a r .ecause without doing it questi estion from the depositions, yo re ving this general guidance, but it help us get ready for the jury Your Honor. + +THE C T I agree. I agree. And I have no lem with that. We have set several days in order to deal with + +But we can talk about the general theory of the utilization of the Fifth Amendment and how that is going to be presented to the jury. So let's go on and proceed further, please. + +MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. + +I have provided Your Honor with the law that really is central and core to your gatekeeping function under 90.401 and 403. And the point is that there's no probative evidence. These Fifth Amendment questions that were asked of my client -- + +O + +THE COURT: No probative value. + +C.) + +MS. ROCKENBACH: No proba 4 alue. + +And the Frazier -- the Four says that even that adverse infer a inst parties when they refuse to St in response to probative evide ffered against them. + +If my c d taken the Fifth Amendment n r. Scarola asked a question about w id Mr. do to wrong you? id he abuse his license to practice and my client said Fifth Amendment, A÷a bsolutely, that is a question that would not only get read, it would get the adverse inference. + +> But the questions that were asked of my client have zero probative value and are not anything related to the issues of probable + +1 cause in this action. + +2 So I might suggest that since + +3 4 5 6 Mr. Scarola is the proponent of those questions and that evidence, that he would identify questions that he wants to present to which my client pled the Fifth. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Before I stop speaking, though, just one other point. Mr. wants to my client's invocation of the Fifth Amendment as a gag order on th malicious prosecution answe ing, in one of his motions it's ke the affidavit. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 And to be c to' the court, we are not submitti fidavit as testimony at trial. We t do that. But it is a bluepri or what my client would testify a ' t ( C /12s is the nst Mr. . complaint that my client filed + +20 21 22 23 24 25 Those were the allegations and the facts and circumstances, which goes to probable cause that Mr. Epstein relied on in December of 2009. So Mr. is moving to strike the affidavit, and based on the Fifth Amendment, says that my client can't + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +use it sword and shield. My client is not using Fifth Amendment as sword and shield whatsoever. + +In the example I gave Your Honor, that would be a sword and shield if my client refused to answer the question of why he Mr. in December of 2009, why hedj i r l filed the original proceeding against instituted that action, Fifth Amendm that would be a sword and shie d they could get an adverse infere + +So part of my omni evised omnibus motion in l' d the response to, I think, Mr. ar s motion to strike my client's a t, implicates the Fifth Amendment. + +: We will take up with the ing of the affidavit separately. + +;:!) MS. ROCKENBACH: Okay. + +THE COURT: I don't think + +MR. SCAROLA: That issue is moot. The affidavit is not going to come into evidence, obviously. It was moved to be stricken as support for a motion that has already been denied. So I don't know why + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +we're talking about striking the affidavit. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Good. Then it seems that it's moot by Mr. and we will move on. But we wanted to make sure that that testimony that's provided in the affidavit should not be under some type of gag order. My client should be able to testify as to what -- why he had proba C b cause. + +THE COURT: My position, Mr. Scarola mentioned its m was that as long as the informat set forth in the affidavit, w h the way -- and it's not uncommo a brilliant as both sides are, have a copy of the affidavit. + +MS : I apologize to the for that. + +OTHE COURT: A÷h cave been attached somewhere -- one other thing. I don't know why Mr. Scarola, from your office, I didn't receive any binder or anything else. I had to, last night, copy the replies and the responses to take home with me. It's okay. While it may + +MR. SCAROLA: We work in a binder-free zone, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: That's fine. But I do require -- because most -- as last night most of my preparation is done at home. And I'm so tired of looking at computers that it's much easier for me to have the hard copies. + +I know others are much more comC:, savvy when it comes to those k things. But I just find it omfortable to be able to have some my hand and read it. If you caq. in go ahead and forward them to a o -- last night getting the response wing my JA -- I commend her for sta as late as she did last night a tting all of that material and ng getting it all marshaled -- + +O Again, I just wanted to gently remind ou folks that I may do things differently than others in the sense that I still like to have hard copies and not to sit there in front of a computer later in the evening. + +÷Y + +Anyway. Sorry I got off on that tangent. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +Did you want to add anything else? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. As + +part of that omnibus motion in limine, we + +somewhat moved on from the Fifth Amendment + +questions and answers, because I think + +Mr. Scarola may want to tee up for the Court + +what precise questions that he is seeking + +admit and introduce into evidence, so t + +Your Honor can rule on each one. pe ap we + +can take that up after lunch. ot sure + +if that works. + +THE COURT: I woul + +of Mr. Scarola's ar + +like to get into obal issue of the + +Fifth Amendm a well as parameters that + +he believes r appropriate as it concerns + +the nat of the questions that are going + +sought to be introduced and the + +cation of the Fifth Amendment and where + +stand currently. + +Because if I'm understanding correctly, + +because of the pendency of that federal + +lawsuit, essentially Mr. Epstein is going to + +be taking the same position now as he has in + +MS. ROCKENBACH: With regard to the Fifth Amendment? + +THE COURT: Yes, + +II. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +That's correct. I want to make sure. But not with regard to any probable cause questions, like those that were asked in h depositions, to which he did not invoke Fifth Amendment. + +They were relevant questio Cthis action. He will not be inv e Fifth as to those questions. consistent with the questions e asked of him in his deposition, hi he invoked the Fifth, he wi ing that again. + +THE C And you're not, at this point -cause I know that the was concerned t retracting any of his Fifth Amendment ''invocations. That is not planned at this juncture? er-plaintiff + +> MS. ROCKENBACH: That's correct, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: So that obviates, then, the need for Mr. Scarola to redepose + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Mr. Epstein? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola, thank you for your patience. You may proceed, sir. + +Thank you, Ms. Rockenbach and Mr. Link, for your written and oral presentations. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, Yo'14S" Honor. If you don't mind, I'm going to O stand at the podium that says, Plain iff + +Your Honor, there is a ver f damental disagreement between presen for Mr. Epstein and Mr. Edwa ou heard Mr. Link say -- and k I took down the quote exactly -- e never challenged that these t es were legitimate cases. + +hese three cases were legitimate can understand why it is that is point in the litigation, Mr. Link r es that they had never challenged that cases. + +But the fact of the matter is that was sued for ginning up, fabricating, constructing those three cases, and others, as a knowing participant in Florida's largest ever Ponzi scheme, that + +4 5 6 7 He was alleged to have fabricated these cases. And it was alleged that the reason 41.1\ why he fabricated the cases was as a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. " + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I can provide the court -- and I do that -- with a copy of the complaint that was filed in this action. We hlighted various allegations in that nt, Your Honor, that specificall e the assertions that Bray ards was involved in manufacturing, br'cating, ginning up these claims + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 rior written sworn testimony so as to In par h seven, it is alleged that L.M. wa essential participant in the referenced in this complaint, by g other things, substantially changing assist the defendants, plural, in promoting their fraudulent scheme for the promise of a multi-million dollar recovery relevant to civil actions, defined below, involving Epstein, which was completely out of + +is, there were two clearly identifiable allegations of wrongdoing contained within the complaint filed by + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +proportion to her alleged damages. + +If we go to paragraph 30, "By using the civil actions against Epstein as bait and fabricating settlements regarding same, Rothstein and others were able to lure investors into Rothstein's lair and bilked IS them of millions of dollars which, in turn were used to fund the litigation against 2.) Epstein for the sole purpose of cont ui g the massive Ponzi scheme." + +"The sole purpose of c cg the massive Ponzi scheme." a eren't legitimate claims. ey re being used solely to fund t on 1 scheme, according to the alleg + +Thirt "As part of this scheme, Rothste d the litigation team" -- and itigation team is defined in the laint as Brad + +Paragraph E: -- "utilized the judicial process, including, but not limited to, unreasonable and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering the Ponzi scheme." + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +to interrogatories in the state court matters, E.W. and L.M., and listed additional high-profile witnesses that would allegedly be called at trial, including, but not limited to:" And then various individuals are identified. + +And then paragraph 41. "The purpose of the scheduling of these sole A:;641; v (::) v ot depositions was, again, to pump up t C e c ses to date r have to investors. There is no evi that any of these individua l Akst actions." k -li any knowledge regarding\ 's ivil + +THE COURT: e quote from p 41, as opposed to argument. record, that's a + +MR'tIOAROLA: Thank you. Sir. I'm scktS + +O If we go to page 18 of the complaint, ubparagraph H. "Rothstein" and again, this is a quote. + +÷s + +"Rothstein and the litigation team knew or should have known that their three filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following reasons." + +Those reasons are listed. + +Again, questioning the legitimacy of the claims. + +Page 21, paragraph 44. "The actions described in paragraph 42 above herein had no legitimate purpose in pursuing the civil" litigations (sic) "against Epstein, but rather were meant to further the fraudu scheme and criminal activity of Roth + +Paragraph 46, the last li RRA and the attorneys in the civil + +Please remember, th~piVV1 action is a defined term in the . It's L.M., E.W. and Jane Do claims -- "needed to create a fic t t included extraordinary damages. a r, the actual facts behind her act ould never support such ordinary damages." + +0 Going down to the last sentence in s ubparagraph A. "Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against Epstein, one of L.M.'s many johns during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to RRA's investors." + +Paragraph 49 of page 27, second sentence. "Rather than evaluating and resolving the cases based on the merits, that is, the facts, which included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by each of the claimants and substantial pre-Epstein psychological and emotional conditions," et cetera. O + +P So again, the allegation is tha C th se children were knowledgeable, v ry and consensual participants. + +THE COURT: Let me this. My memory is good, butt at The three litigants that dwards represented and perhaps stil ents -- L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe -- e they all allegedly underagrtb t the time of these encounters? + +A;M . SCAROLA: Yes, sir, they were. So obviously, as a matter of law, they Algewere incapable of consenting. + +> The last sentence I want to reference in this case, Your Honor, appears at page 30. The last sentence in paragraph 52, in order to continue to bring in moneys from investors, Rothstein and other + +co-conspirators used the civil actions against Epstein, along with other manufactured lawsuits, as a means of obtaining massive amounts of money." + +So when opposing counsel tells you, We have never challenged that these three cases were legitimate, again, while I understand why they wish that were true, that is n true. + +C ) + +cases were ginned u was -- referring E.W. and Jane Doe -- what was, Well, when I said ginned up, nt manufactured, fabricated cases. din about And when Mr. Epstein was this action, Mr. Epstein wa what he meant when he t i that these what he said + +?Sind its the Fifth Amendment with regard to +II atters that are relevant to probable cause, as to whether he had a legitimate basis to claim that fabricated these cases. the assertion is made that he never + +> Page 34, the deposition of March 17, 2010 at line 23, quote, Specifically, what + +are the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up? + +Answer: "I would like to answer that question. A, many of the files and documents that we've requested from Mr. and the Rothstein firm are still unavailable. + +iS "With respect to anything that I point to today, I'm, unfortunately, oin to have to take the Fifth Amendme Ch that, the Sixth and Fourteenth." + +Now, that's just o obvious rectly, what are the allegations It , claim in your complaint ar and he refuses to answer the ion on basis of the Fifth Amendme civilege. There are many others. example where he's + +!SAnd y the question is posed, which tions do I want to place before the jury s to which Mr. -- excuse me, I did it -- to which Mr. Epstein has asserted the Fifth Amendment, and the answer is every single one of them. + +THE COURT: And that's where we're going to have difficulty. As far as the + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Court is concerned the case that -- strike that. + +been with things of that nature The question and answer that was just provided would be admissible. What we're talking about, Mr. Scarola, are questions that were cited in the motion and that the court has chosen not to read, that are of aC graphic, sexual nature, and have, to my recollection, a general form of ques ion as opposed to specifics: Have yo done certain things to minors? ever prostitutes? 4SOu ever -- + +MR. SCAROLA 41S on't recall that last question, bu -, rstand the Court's -- I understand e ourt's concern. + +T : Ms. Rockenbach's question. + +A 's"Again, I know you understand it, but I to make sure that the record is clear, A÷a nd that's this. I have an obligation, as both sides are well aware, to ensure that we are working on a level playing field to the extent that it is possible. + +> I have the obligation, as Ms. Rockenbach points out, to be the + +gatekeeper of evidence and to ensure to the best of my ability that we are not going to be engaging in pejorative name-calling types of questioning, nor are we going to get into inflammatory types of questioning just for the sole purpose of information. + +Now, I know you wouldn't do that. at the same time, as advocates, your respective positions have to be clea favor of your respective clien + +However, as I said ear becomes an issue of dri specifics before I actual questions introduced. 'own really into the rulings on the are being sought to be + +So thecbal decisio aspect of the Court's this time, until I look at the 1 questions, is essentially this. And, r is, that I'm going to permit -- and e've already gotten a stipulation on the record by Mr. Epstein's counsel, which I appreciate -- that is, he's not going to be receding from his Fifth Amendment invocations. He's not going to be changing his testimony, so as to necessitate further + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +discovery as it relates to his testimonial evidence that has already been presented. + +Therefore, those questions that deal with, for example, the question that you asked and answered, would be admissible. Those, because of the reasons that I stated A earlier, would seem to make common sense t me and seems to be the thrust of the 0 decisions of the court's, whether in Florida or outside of Florida -- the v being outside of the state federal courts -- and, Fifth Amendment can sed to take away jority from the that the Mr. ' abi to' prove his case or prove the pr a ause element. + +So to a xtent that it would be needed in front of the jury, any ions that deal with the issue of + +Epstein's lawsuits brought by + +on behalf of the respective clients, would be germane. And any invocation, such as what was illustrated here, would be germane and relevant and found to be admissible. That's the core ruling of the Court. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +perspective of the need to drill down further, is one of A0104Ar The closer question, and the one that I because the complaint -- and I apprecia ) the fact that you brought this with C ou today and provided it to me -- eca se the complaint delineates the na allegations -- at least summary aims -- how much the are we going to ble to introduce, if those questi e asked? I haven't memorized t position testimony. + +Now, when it comes to issues of general graphic questioning, such as what has been exemplified by way of the counter-defendant's motion, those will not be permitted. + +Isy + +There at least two depositions, if of mistaken. + +S:) 4 MS. ROCRENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: Two depositions. I haven't memorized that testimony. + +But since the complaint -- let me cite to you exactly where we are -- where I am alluding to here. Page 18 and it states, "Rothstein and the litigation team knew or + +relevant but problem qu Then it goes through "L.M. testified she had never had any type of sex with Epstein; worked at numerous clubs; is an admitted prostitute and call girl; has a A(16:Ar history of illegal drug use" (pot, painkillers Xanax, Ecstasy); and con inu lly asserted the Fifth Amendment d her depositions in order to avx -ring >n for her. + +"E.W. testifie strip clubs, inc cheetah, which RRA represented hich Rothstein may have owned an in r t. And E.W. also worked at Platinu wgirls in Boynton Beach, which, e subject of a recent police raid, e dancers were allegedly selling - p rescription painkillers and drugs to customers and prostituting themselves. rked 11 separate + +> "Jane Doe (federal case) seeks \$50 million from Epstein. She and her attorneys claim severe emotional distress as a result of her having voluntarily gone to + +should have known that their three filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following reasons." + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Epstein's home. She testified that there was never oral, and/or sexual intercourse; nor did she ever touch his genitalia. Yet, Jane Doe suffered extreme emotional distress well prior to meeting Epstein as a result of having witnessed her father murder his girlfriend's son. She was required to sworn testimony in that matter and has admitted that she lied in sworn test Jane Doe worked at two differe ip clubs, including Platinum S r1 in Boynton Beach." End qu A + +13 14 15 16 17 That's going t atter for further discussion, as f s at, if any, questions we ed to those three individuals whether Mr. Epstein refused to answ r hose questions. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A;Because e questions specific to those three i ndividuals, then the likelihood is again without prejudging -- I haven't looked at those questions -- that I will admit those into evidence, because they relate directly to Mr. Epstein's claim in his deposition and his repeated claim that these cases were, if he did refuse to answer + +quote, ginned up, end quote, and had no merit until rather recently. + +MR. SCAROLA: And in that regard, Your Honor, obviously, if the defense is going to take the position, as they have stated on the record now, that these were all legitimate claims, the extent to which we need to get into details with regard to happened between Jeffrey Epstein and the three claimants against hi be very different than if t challenging the legitim he claims. oing to ist in + +Now, if they d if they are continuing to c e the legitimacy of the claims, the on-the-record announcemen t t's just been made, this is going t a very different trial than if come in and say, In spite of the fact Jeffrey Epstein alleged that A÷E dwards fabricated these claims, we no longer take that position. We recognize the fact that these were, indeed, legitimate claims, very valuable legitimate claims. So valuable that we settled them for S5.5 million in combination. And extremely + +1 2 valuable claims because of the punitive damage exposure that Mr. Epstein confronted. + +3 4 How much we need to prove is dependent upon how much is contested. + +5 6 I doubt that they are going to concede punitive damage liability. + +7 8 9 THE COURT: Where are we on that? there been a ruling on the punitive dam claim? + +10 11 12 MR. SCAROLA: We have an permitted by the Court. punitive damage claim pending ag . Epstein. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 There are pend' es with regard to the implications Fi h Amendment assertions w rd to issues concerning net worth, c ase among the questions he's refused'tile. nswer are any questions relating t S 's net worth. + +19 20 Si 0 THE COURT: Okay. But there is a Al current punitive damage claim? + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Absolutely. Yes, sir. + +22 23 24 25 THE COURT: I just want to make sure. The way it was written, it was a little bit cryptic in terms of pending. I didn't know if it was still a motion that needed to be + +1 2 heard in that regard. That's all been taken care of. + +3 4 MR. LINK: I think Judge entered that order, Your Honor. + +5 6 MR. SCAROLA: All over but the jury verdict. + +7 8 9 10 Your Honor, in the 10 minutes or nine minutes now that I have left before lun want to go through something that I will be helpful to the Court. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 In resolving some of t ups that Your Honor has focused h clearly are rd to how probable cause i oven in the context of a Fifth Amendm s rtions on the part of the defenda who won't talk about some element issues of concern w + +18 19 LINK: Mr. Scarola, one second? Do you mind? may I interrupt + +20 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +21 22 23 24 MR. LINK: Judge, I want to make sure this is clear, because I thought I stated this very clearly, but sometimes what comes our of my mouth isn't what's in my head. + +MR. LINK: Which is, I believe I very clearly said that we have never taken the position that during the time that + +Mr. was a sole practitioner, when these cases were filed up to the point that he joined Mr. Rothstein's firm, did we contend that he was doing anything that wa% inappropriate. O + +THE COURT: Okay. + +C + +MR. LINK: During the tim- he was at the Rothstein firm -- if 1 read the complaint -- everyt t Mr. Scarola just read to you wall ring the time he was employed at Rothstein's firm. + +There i fi allegation in this complaint t tt relates to the time period from whey were filed until he joined othstein's firm. + +0 That's a very significant distinction, ecause we are absolutely going to say that Mr. Rothstein himself was using -- + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. Could I finish my argument in the few minutes that are left before we hear rebuttal? + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +hear what Mr. Link is trying to suggest so that you can formulate your argument. + +MR. SCAROLA: I know exactly -- + +THE COURT: I will give him a minute. + +MR. LINK: I don't want to take long. + +said I just want to clarify, because Mr. Scarola that we have conceded that nothing waS fabricated. + +0 What was fabricated was not the fil ng of the three lawsuits in 2008. as that there were other claims in to those three, and that one of ree settled for 30 million, and at r. Epstein had offered \$200 mil hose are the things that we were about during that time period. C + +Again, quote, Well, the allegation, in subparagraph H, which was already into the record -- I will read it Rothstein and the litigation team -- parenthetically Mr. Scarola has suggested that the litigation team is defined as Mr. -- returning to the quoted provisions -- knew or should have known that their three filed cases were weak 4 5 6 7 and had minimal value -- and for the reasons I have already gone through in addressing what I think is going to be relevant as to those three individuals if the contention is still that these claims were not legitimate during the period of time that Mr. Rothstein ad Mr. worked together. + +8 9 10 11 12 MR. LINK: I just want to make thi distinction. I don't want to beat t is horse too much. If you look a paragraph before that parag talks about the \$500 million + +13 14 ac y THE COURT: I 1 e that in consideration. l + +15 16 MR. LINK ol t's relative to that Secondlia9,6 Honor + +17 18 19 LA: I'm sorry. I would like, e few minutes remaining, to be able to some points before -- + +20 21 22 THE COURT: Mr. Link, I am going to ask you, then, to save your commentary for rebuttal. + +23 24 MR. LINK: I just was trying to answer your questions. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +question pending, but I appreciate it. + +MR. LINK: My pleasure. + +MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I have + +prepared an outline, which I hope is of some help to the Court in placing these issues in context. + +The first thing that Your Honor needs, to determine is the issue that we have focusing on. What are the factual ) C.. allegations that we claim were alx iously prosecuted against + +Now, what we have rd is an effort to draw a di nc n that is not drawn in the co nt What we heard is we claim that t e eg imate cases that were filed by Br while he was the sole pr tioner somehow became itimate the moment he walked trough the r of RRA. That's what we just heard. hat just doesn't make any sense. That's not the allegation in the complaint. + +The allegation in the complaint -- and as testified to by Mr. Epstein repeatedly in his deposition -- the allegation in the complaint is , quote, ginned + +1 2 3 up these claims and he describes that as he crafted the complaints, he fabricated the complaints. + +4 5 6 Now ginned up doesn't happen to appear in Merriam-Webster's dictionary. But there are sources that define ginned up. + +7 8 9 The Oxford Dictionary says ginned up means to generate or increase something especially by dubious or dishonest m + +10 11 12 The McMillan dictionary: o eate, to generate, especially artifi g or by dubious means. + +13 14 The Free Dicti To create or produce. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So what alleged to have done is to have gen 1,4 means, ms d by dubious and dishonest on behalf of three individuals eal y weren't victims for the sole ose as Mr. Epstein repeatedly a lleges for the sole purpose of supporting a massive Ponzi scheme, in which, as Your Honor as observed repeatedly -- and I will get to this in just a moment -- Jeffrey Epstein could not possibly have been a victim. Didn't know about it. Didn't + +know anybody involved in it. Didn't know it was going on until after it was over. Didn't spend a single penny investing in his own fabricated settlements. + +And to the extent that he claims his damages are attorney's fees for what was going on while these cases were being prosecuted, Your Honor is very, very familiar with the litigation privile (l e, t nd knows that nothing that went o course of the prosecution o cases, whether it was legitima legitimate, 4.1 fre can form the basis ; a arate civil lawsuit. + +Motion co empt, motion to impose sanctions, 5 motion, bar complaint -- a lot of remedies are available, but not arate civil action, because he had to d attorney's fees on what he claims were ÷'llegitimate discovery pursuits, which the evidence will show were totally and completely justified, and in many cases initiated long before ever became a member of RRA. + +1 that -- + +2 3 THE COURT: You are talking about the expenditure of attorney's fees? + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. That's correct. + +5 6 Could not be damages. Just can't be as a matter of law. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Even if it were not already clear tha Epstein alleged Brad fabricated the thr cases he was prosecuting against Eps that's the only allegation tha possibly support a claim ag because as I mentioned se of the litigation privileg + +14 15 16 17 18 But in addi to' that, he suffered no damage from o i scheme. He didn't even know a u it. Any action Brad took in the cou f prosecuting those three cases, ute y privileged. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 And as e stablished in this case that there was no evidence to support those claims, because we filed a motion for summary judgment. On the eve of the motion for summary judgment, without ever having filed any opposition whatsoever, he voluntarily dismissed those a matter of law, it has been + +claims. That issue has been resolved. + +So we must prove lack of probable cause as to either/or both of the two false claims. We have to prove Epstein did not have a reasonable basis to believe that Brad fabricated the three claims, and he didn't have reasonable basis to allege that Brad S was a knowing participant in the Ponzi 0 scheme. + +Alk" + +C + +How do we do that when the a Fifth Amendment assertion? How d+ • •ove what Epstein reasonably belied -n he blocks relevant discovery assertion, not only of a Fifth a dment privilege, but of a clearly le a attorney-client privilege a w 1 + +r Honor has read the itions. You know all of the relevant tions that were not answered with regard o attorney-client privilege are matched by the number of relevant questions to which he asserts attorney-client privilege as well. + +So where do we go from there? And the answer -- + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +wrap up. I want to respect the fact that I have already allowed Ms. Rockenbach to leave at 11:45. + +> MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Thank you. I will, Your Honor. + +The answer lies in a very fundamental presumption. And that fundamental presumption is every person is presumed have intended the natural and probab C e ) consequences of his act. Very principle of law. It is ci ifically in the case that I have h page. But it is a universal p of law recognized in al can jurisdictions. + +hose are three provisions of the evidence code -- talk about the effect of that presumption -- and I won't go into that now. I will wait until after lunch -- but, basically, this lays out the way this case is proved. Florida statute 90.301 through 304 -- + +So, pro Epstein filed a false claim again adley gives rise to the pre ion that he intended to file a claim against + +If we prove that these were not false claims, if we prove that Jeffrey Epstein knew they weren't false claims, because he was the one who physically participated in doing what he is alleged to have done, so he had to have known what he did -- once we've proven that, the presumption arises he intended to file knowingly false claims O against and we have if ed the burden of proof to him to p one of two things: the claims were That's a defense. The other def Well, we know the claims wer lie reasonably belie t to be true at the time. Thank C.P) is) u sir. I will leave it right ue, but I + +there. + +(\T HE COURT: Thank you, again, both s for your excellent presentations. "Ar\la i'T hank you to our courtroom personnel as well. + +> What we are going to do is return at about 1:40. I have something that I need to do between the lunch, which I'm going to leave a little early and an errand I need + +do. So come back at 1:40. + +What I propose we will do is I will give you two hours this afternoon. We will go to about 3:40, and then proceed back with the remaining issues on the days that we have already set aside. + +Again, thank you all very much for yo,SA courtesies. Have a pleasant lunch. reconvene at 1:40. We will be in re ess Thank you. + +(A recess was had 11:4 - 1:44 p.m.) + +THE COURT: Good of jlno. , everybody. Welcome back. Okay S t o ahead and proceed then. + +Mr. Sca `,were in the midst of your Power + +MR OLA: Thank you, sir. Yes. + +A/%Your 14 h we broke off, the defense has taken "d\s"\t he position that the Baxter and Frazier cases stand for the proposition that the Fifth Amendment may not be the sole basis upon which a plaintiff rests its case to satisfy the burden of proof with regard to any element of the plaintiff's claim. We Honor, just to recap the point at + +don't take issue with that. That's good law. + +You cannot determine from a Fifth Amendment adverse inference alone whether probable cause did or did not exist. And what the other evidence is that both A(54Ar lsy that's why I have reviewed with Your Honor directly and circumstantially establish that there was an absence of probabltafse. + +We begin with a point tha presumed to have intended t h one did. And Jeffrey Epste he filed claims demonstrated alse, is presumed to have intended.flf e claims that were false. + +We Indepen of any evidence that relates to we get to prove the truth of Brad rds' underlying claims on behalf of ÷.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. are C o taking about malice yet. + +So that then brings us -- + +THE COURT: I think I have already essentially ruled on that from a global standpoint. I am in agreement with you that any Fifth Amendment invocation as it + +pertains to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe again, globally and without getting into graphic -- I intend to admit as being relevant. + +You can proceed. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, Your Honor. + +So we had broken off at this point where I began to talk about Florida vid nce Code sections 90.301 through 30,jnd I have a copy of those eviden provisions that I will to the Court. I have provided the well. osing counsel as + +> THE CO AS you. + +MR. SCAROLA: These provisions focus on the shi burden of proof, what a mption does and what a presumption does And I have underlined some sections A÷h ere for Your Honor that I think are of particular significance in those three evidence code provisions. + +> And basically the gist of these evidence code provisions is that once we have proven that these were false claims, + +0 P And that's the point at which w C br ke for lunch, where I pointed out at that point, Mr. Epstein has ever t to come in and say, now, wait a eon You have put on evidence tha hhe were false claims -- I mean, at hese were valid claims, but he right to come in put on evidence h k they were not valid claims. And he utely does. + +( ,13E COURT: y point A÷fact that we can't take it from one side only, and that if the proof is essentially within the invocation of the Fifth Amendment, i.e., the questions that were asked that would be pertinent to the issues of probable cause but refuse to be answered, I think that was the gist I made earlier regarding the + +once we have adduce proof that these were false claims, and take advantage of the presumption that the filing of knowingly false claims gives rise to one is presumed to have intended to do that, which one did, and probably consequences of filing false A and presumed to have intended the natural claims, then the burden shifts. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +then should not be penalized because of that. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. And I certainly agree with it. And that's why I made the comment that it becomes significant when the defense stands up during the course AS" of this argument and says we are not claiming that these were fabricated cla at the point in time at which Brad is a sole practitioner. We're ing they became fabricated claims of oined RRA. And then I guess t y re saying is they're unfabric d n he settled them for \$5.5 millio + +If he w 'try to make that argument to h jury, that's fine. He can try to that argument to the jury. think it's going to go anywhere as a er of fact, nor do I think it's going to o anywhere as a matter of law. But he can try it. He can try to say the valid claims got unvalidated and then got validated again, and I settled them for \$5.5 million. + +At any rate, the burden does shift to him. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now, he can also say that these were valid claims, but I reasonably believe them, mistakenly, but reasonably believed them to be invalid claims. I had probable cause to support my malicious prosecution claim, because I thought, mistakenly, but reasonably, that they were invalid claims. + +8 9 10 Then we get to the fact that Epste cannot reasonably believe what Jeffr Epstein knows to be false. + +11 12 13 And Jeffrey Epstein kn her he molested these children these children. idn't molest + +14 15 16 ?;;PI all7 e So if we pr tha he molested them, he cannot co reasonably believed that he did olest them. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Weed that he knew the cases were abricated with proof that he actually sted L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. We proved ginned up cases. These were not fabricated or created, not ginned up by proving that he settled them for \$5.5 million, not while he was under some misapprehension about what these cases were all about, but after the Ponzi scheme was hat these were not + +fully and completely disclosed, after he read all of these news articles that he claims that he relied on -- or that his lawyers claimed he relied on, because he hasn't made those claims, but his lawyers have made those claims -- and we proved the A cases weren't fabricated, with proof of MA'S, guilty plea to the molestation of child with his Fifth Amendment assertion, se his Fifth Amendment assertion t point clearly is relevant and mat ..nd an adverse inference can b from that. + +We proved that not have a basis to file these cl ecause he fails to defend again ummary judgment, voluntarily iJnisses the cases, and never + +refiles ?SI? point amide resolution of his claims in favor of . And we proved the cases were not ginned up by proving similar fact evidence. question about the fact that, at in time, there has been a bona + +And Your Honor made some reference to this, but I want to be sure that we focus PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE, INC. (561)471-2995 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +specifically on this aspect of the case, because one of the things that the defense is attempting to exclude is any reference to anything other than L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases. + +Your Honor suggested -- and I thought that I heard you correctly -- that evidenc with regard to other claims actually fi against Epstein would be relevant an material. And clearly it is. A(::) + +THE COURT: I believe id was those cases filed by Mr s or any claims that were II st Epstein by a client represent + +Tell me G11 7 G think that the aggregate c e knot having anything to do with Mr ards' representation or tein firm's representation -- because Berger, I think, was involved in some espects as well. + +MR. SCAROLA: Co-counsel. + +THE COURT: Solely as co-counsel -- I believe that to be the case -- are you suggesting that the aggregate cases would be relevant? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. And they are relevant for multiple reasons. + +Your Honor will recall the chart that was put up by opposing counsel that attempted to summarize all of those things Alc that Jeffrey Epstein could have reasonably relied upon to -- I guess what they're saying now is mistakenly conclude that was part of this Ponzi schem among those things that are re a ed in that chart were Brad Edward for example -- and this A;%n \$1, one is to, example -- to take y from pilots about what was g private plan three client not pas rs on the planes. on Jeffrey Epstein's all of Brad • knowledged that they were + +And that rad hey were not passengers Epstein's private jets. is true. ' clients It is true that all acknowledged that on Jeffrey But both the Florida Evidence Code and Federal Rules of Evidence expressly permit -- the federal rules are very explicit about this - expressly admit the introduction of evidence + +A÷f ocused k of error, if we go beyond that ded limitation, is significant. And i to make sure that we, again, are on the elements of the claim. whether it be for compensatory damages associated with Mr. ' claim or And punitive damages associated with Mr. ' claim, we are still dealing with a malicious prosecution claim, solely a + +with regard to other child molestations in any child molestation claim. + +THE COURT: So let's talk about that for a minute. Because again, what I don't want this to turn into is a case testing whether or not Epstein was an alleged serial child molester. It would not, in my view, pass muster legally, and I don't want t this case twice. + +I think that we should be ely circumspect when it deals - e are dealing with global iss olestation of graphic description types of alleged molestation, exc w re we are dealing with claims e been brought on behalf of those re a nted by Mr. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +malicious prosecution claim. + +And so to deviate from that direction would be precarious and concerning to the Court, in particular, because when we're dealing with issue of probable cause, we're only Mr. Epstein's stated intent, but I AS V focusing on -- as I've made clear -- not fully intend to allow circumstantial 1 7 evidence, inclusive of the invocation the Fifth Amendment relevant quest pertaining to the plaintiff counter-plaintiff's, mo sely -- Mr. ' positi to plain to the jury why -- or to the why Mr. Epstein brought this what were the true motivating rs concerning same. + +0 w this to intrude into ations of serial molestation is erous and is concerning. + +You may proceed. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, Your Honor. I acknowledge the legitimacy of the Court's concern. And I recognize the fact that the Court, appropriately, under Rule 403, must balance probative value against prejudice. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +However, as soon as Mr. Epstein takes the position, as he has in this demonstrative exhibit that -- + +THE COURT: Show me where, please. + +MR. SCAROLA: Let's go through these and -- let me zoom in. On this top line are IS all of those circumstances subsequent to 4/9/09 when became a me of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, wh Counsel says gave raise to a r suspicion that Edwa a knowing participant in the Ponz and was ti using fabricated cl cs support that Ponzi scheme. + +Let's t one at a time. + +Jane ve to unseal the non-pro ion agreement. + +(Now, the non-prosecution agreement is essly referenced in the complaint, as is he Crime Victims' Rights Act case. + +So if Jeffrey Epstein is going to say efforts to unseal the non-prosecution agreement contributed to his reasonable belief that was a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme, we need + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +4÷Am endment and attorney-client THE COURT: lets stop there for a minute and 1 ocus ourselves on the motion that fore the Court. It's a motion mine, particularly -- from this s perspective -- important as it tes to the invocation of the Fifth privilege, whatever that might amount to be. + +explain what the non-prosecution agreement was. + +THE COURT: Okay. + +MR. SCAROLA: And what the + +non-prosecution agreement was, was a deal 46 6C that Jeffrey Epstein entered into with the federal government to avoid criminal prosecution for the molestation of (::) v approximately 40 children. dwa ds was challenging the validity o non-prosecution agreement b a Crime Victims' Rights Act cas referenced in the complaint. + +If you ask Mr. Epstein -- or if you have asked Mr. Epstein a question regarding whether or not he was motivated to sue Mr. because in part of the move by + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Jane Doe through Mr. -- as I understand, Mr. has been counsel. + +> MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. Pro bono counsel in that case for many years. + +THE COURT: And you ask Mr. Epstein is it not true that you entered into this non-prosecutorial agreement because of X, and Z, I don't think there's a problem that. + +In other words, if he ref es o answer the question, then I think be admitted. + +A question of you are a serial child molestatio fail the 403 analysis in + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. If I led the Court t ieve that that's what the ion was going to be, then I wasn't r unicating very well. + +THE COURT: You have always communicated exceptionally well, so it could very well be my error. + +So tell me what is the intent, then - do you recall the questions that have been asked, if any, regarding this particular NPA + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +that he failed to respond to at this point? + +MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. I can't recall those offhand. What I was addressing was not specifically a Fifth Amendment issue, although, I recognize the fact that this motion is supposed to be focused on the Fifth Amendment. But Your Honor, I tho raised the question about whether we wer going to get into the existenc- ther claims besides the claims o E.W. and Jane Doe. And that's s responding to. I was point' 4oCu;::S at there is absolutely n b avoid getting into the existence o tl se other claims, because Epstein raised those issues in the aint he filed against Brad . he is relying upon those circumstances virtue of the presentation that is being made during this hearing to suggest to Your + +÷y + +Honor, One of the reasons why I had probable + +cause to believe that this was a maliciously + +prosecuted case against me was because of + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +in moving to set aside the non-prosecution agreement. + +So if that's what he's telling you he intends to prove, I'm simply pointing out to Your Honor -- and I can go through this - and it's going to come up in almost every one of these elements. While I understandt the Court's concern about trying to nar the focus, the door has been blown o hinges by Mr. Epstein's own co + +And his lawyers have t -t door and thrown it out the w en they argued to Your Hono ne of the reasons why we believe —Jeffrey Epstein reasonably b e that Brad was a knowing par ant in the Ponzi scheme, is because owed to set aside the rosecution agreement after he joined + +Now, many aspects of this timeline -- + +THE COURT: I have to say, I really don't understand the connection, but I will give Mr. Link the opportunity to explain it to me. + +I understand it either, but this is their exhibit. They are the ones that are saying this was the basis for our making this determination, or for Mr. Epstein reasonably believing that Brad was a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme. + +THE COURT: Just for the record, ther was never a malicious prosecution claim filed by Epstein -- + +MR. LINK: There was not, Honor. + +THE COURT: Abuse of p laim? + +MR. LINK: Yes. + +THE COURT: at the record is clear. + +MR. SCAROLA )Luse of process claim. + +MR. LINkid)And, I may just po Your Honor, if + +THE COURT: No, not right now, please. + +will have amble opportunity to rebut. + +MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge. + +THE COURT: I don't want to get into what we did this morning. + +MR. SCAROLA: So all I am responding to -- and maybe this isn't the appropriate time to do that -- is the idea that we are + +4 5 6 7 8 9 able to sanitize this case to the point where we are not going to be talking about a variety of other claims that were being prosecuted by other plaintiffs' lawyers working together with Brad and not going to be talking about the Crime Victims' Rights Act case, because as Your Honor has A repeatedly acknowledged, motive is goi C n be very significant. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 And we intend to prove th Je frey Epstein's motive in filing owingly false claims against Br -- his motive was to extor into abandoning or c Compromising the rights of h' s, and abandoning his efforts thr the Crime Victims' Rights Act cas Norset a4/44ent. aside the non-prosecution + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 He had an enormous economic motive, if ÷e could limit his civil exposure, and he had a tremendous motive, in terms of the criminal liability he faced. And the way he chose to address that was, I'm going to make an example out of Brad , who has taken a leadership role among all these + +plaintiffs' lawyers, and I'm going to target one of these victims. I'm going to sue them both, and I'm going to show them what happens when you try to take on this billionaire. That's what he was trying to do. Plain and simple. And we are entitled, I respectfully suggest, to be able to prov just how big a motive that was, stake. what's + +THE COURT: I'm not in dis with you. ent + +When this went on response to Mr. Lin is presentation as to Mr. Epstein's sons were what? Was that this ca tP ned around directly to harm potent r. Epstein and provide Mr. Edw with the motivation. So I'm not sagreement with you. )b d, my first + +0 A÷c ertainly one of the more pertinent things The only thing I am concerned with - that I am concerned with for today's hearing, again, relates back to how far we are going to permit the jury to hear, or how much we are going to permit the jury to hear as it relates to these other claims. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +onor. MR. LINK: That's correction, Your + +THE COURT: -- in Judge Marra's court, assuming he's still the Judge on the case. + +MR. SCAROLA: Just to clarify that point, if I could. + +Now, as you further described it - again, subject to Mr. Link's rebuttal - there is no way around the fact that the NPA is going to become a part of this trial. + +As I have indicated earlier, and the reason for my question was to ensure that my understanding was correct that the princip4 reason -- or a principle reason Mr. Eps continues to invoke the Fifth Amendm because of the pendency of this case, correct? + +MR. LINK: General the pending of the case -- + +THE CO potential of a criminal -- u her criminal exposure if the NPA get oked -- or whatever the nology is -- + +MR. SCAROLA: The non-prosecution agreement is an agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It extends immunity to Mr. Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators 414 4.1.1\y for crimes committed in the Southern District of Florida. + +So even if per chance the Crime IS' 0 Victims' Rights Act case were to go way) tomorrow, which seems highly u Mr. Epstein will still have right to assert a Fifth Amendmen ege. And I acknowledge that. av t challenged the validity of his h endment assertion. + +What we about is not his right to as it's the consequences of that as + +( ,11M COURT: And to respectfully bring ack into focus on what's before the ourt, generally, the invocation of the Fifth Amendment -- and bringing out the fact that the NPA in some form or fashion, because of it being a reason for the invocation of the Fifth Amendment -- is going to be mentioned during the trial. + +There's no way around it. + +MR. LINK: We understand that, Judge. + +THE COURT: Fine. + +The question that I am going to pose to you and Mr. Scarola now is how far we are going to go with that agreement and where the 403 analysis has to focus. So -- ? + +esolve plaintiffs' claims. MR. SCAROLA: r Apn'or, I believe that it is unavo hat the jury be informed as the non-prosecution agreement i t would be our intention to enter i o evidence. They need to stand what the Crime Victims' Rights What they don't need to do is to the legitimacy of 40 other + +Now, some of Mr. Epstein's (sic) clients -- in fact, I think all three of them -- are identified in the non-prosecution agreement. So Mr. Epstein, + +(:.(1 1 + +opportunity. Not now. When you have your + +Mr. Scarola. + +MR. LINK: Champing at AS ), Your Honor. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +as part of the non-prosecution agreement, agrees to compensate each of these 40 people under specific circumstances. And that gets us into a discussion as to why the federal lawsuit was filed. And this is something that we have referenced briefly in argument before Your Honor earlier. But + +THE COURT: I want to stay on thisO subject for just a moment, if I coul that is, tell me why you belie t the motivation that Mr. Epstein e had to file this suit was rela or is related to this Jane Doe mov unseal the NPA. Explain that to ain, please. + +MR. S es, sir. + +I thin t t, obviously, motive can only be en through circumstantial nce if the defendant is not confessing. not only is Mr. Epstein not confessing, e's refusing to give considerable relevant testimony because of his assertion of both the attorney-client privilege in the absence of any assertion of advice of counsel defense, as we have already established, and his Fifth Amendment privilege. So we need + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +to prove what his motive is circumstantially. + +And Mr. Epstein clearly knows that Mr. is lead counsel in this Crime Victims' Rights Act case. He clearly knows, because he's a participant in that case. He has intervened in the case. He knows thatI S the consequences of that Crime Victims'( Rights Act case could be that he los immunity that he negotiated wi c U.S. Attorney's Office. + +So being able to p A aside as the primar ova force in the Crime Victims' ct case is obviously a reasonable cclb ion from those C circumstanc . But it goes beyond that, because ct threats were ds by Jeffrey Epstein. made to + +0 THE COURT: So the suggestion, I guess, Ai:4:s?'from lo the defense, the malicious prosecution claim of Mr. Epstein is that he found it necessary to file the lawsuit -- strike that. + +> Yeah. He found it necessary to file the lawsuit against Rothstein, and + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +L.M., because he felt that by doing this unsealing, it was motivation, it was exposure, it was public information so as to allegedly gin up these three claims held by the three plaintiffs with the initials and the Jane Doe. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +THE COURT: On the other hand, indicated, the reverse effect taking would be Mr. the ill motive was the fact file this lawsuit again others -- was becau exposed, if you . as o S late ' position in fact - and to and pstein was being + +> MR. S : oor choice of words. + +THE COURT) Pardon me? + +MR OLA: Poor choice of words. + +was a joke, Your Honor. A bad one. + +TEE COURT: That's okay. I understand. + +So that's essentially what I'm understanding count -- point - counterclaim. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +My only point is, we can't avoid getting into that. As soon as they raise A + +A'e 4 icause only, is But I don't think it's necessary to parse out is this relevant to probable it relevant to malice only. If it's relevant to one or the other it comes in. + +it, we can make the counterpoint. We can explain why it was done. And the same thing is true with regard to everything else that is on this list. The claim for \$50 million -- + +THE COURT: I'm not sure that they even have raise it for it to be relevant. + +MR. SCAROLA: I don't think they d because we have an obligation to pro case. We get to prove malice. + +THE COURT: Well, I am 4 t lking about probable cause. + +MR. SCAROLA: 4 \ p able cause. Yes, sir. I agree. an rove probable cause. We can prove . Epstein knew. We can prove his m i s, and we can prove malice as part roving probable cause. + +THE COURT: And the 40 individuals that you are contending and that's the subject to this NPA are all minors? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, Your Honor. + +And what the federal law says is \$150,000 per molestation. That's what the federal law says. And what the NPA says is if these claim are brought pursuant to the federal statute, you are not going to contest your liability. + +Now, what they did contest is whet it's 150,000 per molestation, or 150 So once you pay the 150,000 yo molest these kids as many t' you want to. + +THE COURT: + +MR. SCAROLA es.' So that was an issue. But s he reason why -- and the jury is goi need to hear this -- why does Br wards file a 256-page -- or 256 raph -- whatever it is -- or 256 + +THE COURT: 254-page -- + +MR. SCAROLA: Whatever it is. Why does he file this lengthy federal case? Was that really as an effort to try to gin up these cases for purposes of participating in a Ponzi scheme, or was there an independent + +legitimate basis for doing what he did? + +THE COURT: Of course, the interesting part of that is from the timeline, the complaint filed -- the federal complaint, 234-page federal complaint was filed after the settlement of three cases. thidnkA + +so. MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. I don't + +MR. LINK: No. THE COURT: I thought tha + +settlement was 7/6 -- I'm s /14 was reading '09. The 7 7/6/10. That was m rr + +MR. SCAROLA And you r ball -- we have already made refere e o the timing of the filing of that ral case that we were obliged to f ' 30-Swithin r She was about irthday and it needed to be filed within that time. two years after L.W. coming of to celebrate her 20th + +THE COURT: There were statute of limitations issues. Again, another counterpoint. + +Absolutely. + +I am only suggesting to Your Honor that it is very difficult to be able to say as a blanket matter, I am not going to let in evidence of these other claims. + +THE COURT: Again, I am not taking that position yet. What I'm saying is that on matter-by-matter basis and we are us Mr. Epstein's timeline and those per ine t events, which are noted therei f there were questions that relate PA that were asked of Mr. Epste e did not answer based on Fif ent grounds, the inclination question by in, subject claiman ithout reading would be to allow that to the issue of multiple f you will, the 40 minors that epresented to the Court. + +0 s tandpoint of both sides, trying to balance But again, when we look at it from the this as best I can under 403, on the one hand we have Mr. taking -- strike that Mr. Epstein taking the position that doing what was done by Jane Doe through Mr. as counsel was an attempt to + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +publicize and to sensationalize the circumstances so as to increase the value of at least the claims that were held by the Rothstein firm. + +MR. SCAROLA: Which I think is what every lawyer is supposed to do within the bounds of propriety, obviously. But our j is to maximize the value of our clients filS" 0 claims. + +C.) + +THE COURT: And on the of de of the coin is Mr. t k' position that the impetus -- or us for filing the complaint at ba a exposure of Mr. Epstein, onc to the ignominy of having to fa ublicity of a non-prosecu 1 agreement where there were admissi where there were agreements s not admissions -- but agreements limited the prosecution of him as it elates to multiple claimants or multiple potential victims. + +So again, my ruling on that is if there are questions that have to do with this issue, globally they will be allowed to be asked subject to further argument as it + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + ++le have the right MR. S : et me just clarify one point, and a is, we have been focusing on questio at have already been asked of pstein. Obviously, we have the right all Mr. Epstein as an adverse witness. to put him in that witness chair in front of the jury and to ask him questions that Your Honor has considered to be appropriate that may not have been asked at the time of his deposition. + +relates to the multiplicity of the numerous victims that we are dealing with here as alleged. + +Same as it goes with this 234-page federal complaint. If there were any questions that were asked of Mr. Epstein where he refused to answer on Fifth A(56Ar Amendment grounds, I find that the (::)S" information would be relevant. Ther for , his failure to answer would be uld be able to be utilized if such 'ons were asked of him regarding page federal le r complaint filed on cl a f L.M. by Mr. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 don't consider nor do I understand Your Honor to be ruling that we would only be limited to asking questions already asked of him in his deposition. We would be permitted to ask him any question relevant and material to the claims that he has made against Mr. , and that -- has been announced we know he will be invokin Fifth Amendment right. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 THE COURT: With the cave understanding that any reas sensitive type of question that i to be V construed as graphi sonably construed as graphic go\* to u o d be run by the court illik7e e questions about global cond first by wa Cio a proffer. + +17 18 MR MAROLA: I understand the Court's rn. And I -- + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OTEE COURT: I am very, very cognizant ÷f the fact that we are going to be spending a significant amount of time both pretrial and at trial. And I do not want to get into a circumstance where we are going to be taking liberties at the expense of ensuring that a fair trial is provided to all. + +MR. SCAROLA: I am happy to make the commitment to the Court, because I understand your concern, and I recognize the sensitivity of these issues. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +MR. SCAROLA: I will make a commitment to the Court that we will proffer in advan any question that we reasonably anticip will invoke a Fifth Amendment privil + +THE COURT: All right. ove on then. Again, let's refocus kIto some of these issues that are d before the Court. + +MR. LINK: Honor, can I just clarify, bec on't want that to untouched a s this. May I, Your Honor? leave + +T : Briefly. + +LINK: Thank you. Very briefly. 0 I want to be clear that we have not eard the questions, so I can't tell you, without knowing what the question is, whether we will raise the Fifth Amendment or not. My commitment to the Court was the questions that were asked already were not going to change the assertion of the Fifth. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: I think that was a caveat to Mr. Scarola's recitation. + +MR. LINK: Thank you, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: Again, it is with the same caveat that I explained earlier, and that is, I am going to have both sides provide me with questions that well, really it would start with Mr. and Mr. Scarola root providing your side with questions - ch as ed hat he will ready been specific questions that were Mr. Scarola in good faith b be asking at trial that subject to invocati e Fifth Amendment ait ' and/or attorney- nt 'privilege or any other privil f that matter. + +All I' e are Fifth Amendment and attorne ent privilege. There may have a Fourteenth amendment or another dment. + +MR. SCAROLA: Those questions will be elicited through Mr. Epstein's deposition, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: So what I'm trying to - again, give you global guidance as to how the Court intends to rule on some of these 1 2 3 4 5 6 issues, but at the same time reserving the ability to be able to review the specific questions that, with the Court's global guidance today, are still subject to debate as to whether or not they are going to be asked. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 For example, Mr. Scarola may have a 41IA he has IS' 0 culled through the testimony, he int ds to ask -- strike that -- he inten •ublish before the jury by way of d utilization. list of 30 questions that, after + +13 14 15 16 17 If you find th r all of those questions are o e e parameters the court has pr ed o you today, then it will be inc t upon you to bring those before nd to -- + +18 19 LINK: Judge, I understand. That's it procedure. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: -- and I will entertain further argument or I may not entertain further argument. I may just rule on it pursuant to the law that I have and what I perceive to be the appropriate rules of evidence. + +1 2 MR. LINK: Understood. That procedure is very clear to me. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 THE COURT: So let's go back now -- I want to give Mr. Scarola his opportunity is there anything else specifically that we need to talk about now on Fifth Amendment issue? Because most of these other exhibi matters, we can handle those we can O handle them today, if you'd like to. Bu we don't need to handle them in co tion with the Fifth Amendment is A + +12 13 14 15 Things like massag 1 and messages from notepads in Ep omes, flight logs, things of don't really i lit e nature, really get into n Fifth Amendment issues. Acq't, + +16 I NIE.) MR. L : We agree. + +17 18 19 TB\$ JRT: So why don't you go ahead, . I want to give you an opportunity ebut. + +20 21 22 23 24 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor asked if there were other specific matters relating directly to Fifth Amendment, and the financial discovery raises Fifth Amendment issues that need to be discussed. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +we get finish with Mr. Link's rebuttal on the global Fifth Amendment issues that we've dealt with thus far. Thank you. + +MR. LINK: Okay, I'm going to pick up a couple of pieces of -- Your Honor, I just want to touch on a couple of pieces of the presentation, then I will go back to where want to go. + +0 You asked about this timeline, d t doesn't say that it had anythi do with setting aside the NPA. Thi 7 ne says this: Jane Doe moved t e the NPA. And the reason that at ught Mr. Epstein's at io was because Mr. Doe already had it. They had a of the NPA, so why would they wa 91t' , to be unsealed? + +THE COURT: For the same reasons that iscussed earlier -- Mr. Scarola was ather blunt about it -- and that is, that doing that will enhance the value of the claims made by the three pseudonym plaintiffs. + +MR. LINK: Maybe. + +that. But it also could inflame Mr. Epstein, potentially, as well. It also could provide Mr. Epstein with bona fide good faith motivation that he thought that this was resolved and now it's being opened up again, so I can see both sides. + +MR. LINK: No question. That's what I!) takes us to the Fifth Amendment and what we're talking about. And that's thi Everything that was just discus ed as to do with the truth -- with the the allegations that are co in Epstein's complaint against M Ed d + +What Mr. S ants to do and what Mr. they want allegat ?SSE t were in his deposition, is w the world that those untrue. + +Sr O + +COURT: Which allegations? + +LINK: The allegations Mr. Epstein + +iled against Rothstein and THE COURT: That the allegation as it relates to the claims by the three pseudonym plaintiffs? + +MR. LINK: No, sir. THE COURT: Start again. I am not + +following you. + +MR. LINK: So there was a lawsuit filed by Mr. Epstein. He sues Rothstein and he sues + +THE COURT: And L.M. + +MR. LINK: And L.M. In that claim, if 46cplaintiffs Mr. represented CS you read it fairly, you will not find an allegation that says that the three O fabricated their claims. What ou ill find, Your Honor, when you t is that it says that those three were used to entice investors to in other cases. + +They also s n this complaint, very clearly, tha os ree cases -- those three cases (:P' t value -tir° t the legitimacy of filing -- the value. value of them the + +0 THE COURT: That's not what it says. + +A÷P aragraph H, which I will read for a third time says, quote, Rothstein and the litigation team -- which I'm assuming that included Mr. -- knew or should have known that their three filed cases were weak and had minimal value for the following + +reasons. + +MR. LINK: Yes. I agree with that. + +And I think any questions about that - right -- any questions about that would go to whether that statement is true. But it doesn't say -- it says they were weak. It doesn't say that they were ginned up. It doesn't say they were fabricated. ItC 0 doesn't say any of the words that Mr. Scarola told id that they should have said, it follows paragraph. And if 17 1 \$500 million, it s that these c w en 't worth \$500 million. you it said. known -- r what I the \$5 '1 on-settlement to it to the ey should have known + +But it o not say anywhere in this complai at Mr. fabricated those cases in 2008. It doesn't say that here. It doesn't say it anywhere. + +I absolutely agree -- I absolutely agree it says they were used by Rothstein to attract investors. Rothstein lied about those cases. + +Mr. candidly told us in his deposition that Rothstein used his cases -- 4 MR. LINK: The point is this. What + +5 6 7 8 9 Mr. Scarola wants to try to the jury is this case right here. He wants the jury to hear the case that settled, these three folks tS get on the stand and say that they were 0 physically abused when they were min rs. + +10 11 12 13 And if that is true -- that's w e tells us -- plaintiff s y proving the truth of the claims, ght on behalf of them. + +14 15 16 17 18 If he does if he proves their underlying c s, e now has lack of probable ca a It's a disconnect, because lack of able cause has to do with ds' (sic) state of mind at the time. + +19 THE COURT: or Epstein? + +20 21 MR. LINK: Epstein. We have all done it four times. + +22 23 24 25 Epstein. Epstein's state of mind, and only his state of mind. I am competent if this case was tried -- this is the Epstein versus Rothstein and -- that + +Mr. ' cases -- and fabricated claims about them in settlements. + +THE COURT: And the point is what? + +;:.i4) + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +Mr. will get on the stand, and he would tell the jury all the reasons why he did what he did. And they may believe him. But whether he had a legitimate reason or not isn't relevant to whether Epstein had probable cause. + +THE COURT: Let's focus on the Fifth Amendment issues. itco + +MR. LINK: Well, that's why important, because if you aske pstein a question -- if you asked estion that goes something lik s Did you touch E.W.? And sanitize t put anything graphic. Did yo uc E.W.? what does that be relevant here. He relevant to this case Judge. He asserts the Fifth. question - asserts the (indica s that relevant to the reasons in his about why he decided to sue Rothstein A nd ? How can it be relevant to that? + +> THE COURT: If you asking me, as opposed to being rhetorical, I can answer it simply. + +4 5 6 THE COURT: His strike, if you will, is a preemptive one by virtue of filing this lawsuit. + +7 8 MR. LINK: That could be his motive. agree. + +9 0 THE COURT: That's a simple ans er.) + +10 11 12 MR. LINK: Well, but that motive, not probable cause. motive ties into the ment. the + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: nd. But the plaintiff in the is "ous prosecution claim, Mr. E s has the ability, through direct and r stantial evidence, to be able to on a case as to what was stein's reason. Why did he do it? To radict Mr. Epstein's contentions. + +20 21 22 23 And, in my respectful view, one of those motives -- if you're asking me - which you have -- and you suggested that you have -- + +24 25 MR. LINK: I have. Go ahead. I need teaching all the time. + +THE COURT: This is pre-settlement, the filing of this lawsuit at bar, okay? + +MR. LINK: Yes. + +THE COURT: It's not teaching. It just a common sense logical thought that the reason why you bring a lawsuit like this that constitutes somewhere in the neighborhood of 35 pages where you are claiming after this -- shortly after this law firm blew up -- + +MR. LINK: Correct. + +THE COURT: -- and everybody isC O scrambling; nobody knows what's g on; federal agents are raiding ces; including, I presume, M office -- + +° y MR. LINK: Yes. Sh took the Epstein case boxes. + +THE CO s is filed in 2009. The number is 4 8 -- gives you an idea of how many fo sure cases we had back then. he bottom line is it's -- I don't know t's on this timeline -- the lawsuit is oted as to when it was filed. + +MR. LINK: 12/7/09. + +THE COURT: 12/7/09. Rothstein is arrested on 12/1/09. A week later (sic). + +MR. LINK: A week before. + +THE COURT: A week before. Exactly. + +Excuse me. A week before. Razorback complaint is filed 11/20/09. Things are, what I would, again, perceive, if you are asking me -- + +MR. LINK: I am. + +THE COURT: -- to be at the zenith of stress and tension. + +MR. LINK: I agree. + +0 ) THE COURT: Here is something t (1 at s filed that, at least arguably c suggested, was trying to ge at his weakest moment. + +MR. LINK: How ou 'f for purposes of today I agree wi ou hat that was the motive? I a to agree with you. Let's say, I u Honor, you are exactly right. purposes of today that was the What does that have to do -- this he whole Fifth Amendment -- what does hat have to do with this (indicating)? + +THE COURT: With probable cause. + +MR. LINK: Probable cause. Because here is what probable cause -- + +THE COURT: Did he have probable cause to file this lawsuit when he did? + +1 2 MR. LINK: When he had the most evil of intent. + +3 THE COURT: You said it, not me. + +4 MR. LINK: Only for purposes of today. + +5 6 THE COURT: You asked me what my perception could be -- + +7 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 THE COURT: and what this jury' 43 perception, more importantly, could Because again, any answers tha given by this Court are what I perce -d upon 35 years of doing this wor a trial lawyer and a trial judge, ng hundreds of jurors and how t d go about their work. + +16 17 "S ) MR. L4 ;.) : You're older than I am. I didn't that was possible. + +18 19 THE COURT: So that's where I think my e of reference is. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. LINK: And I appreciate it. And I appreciate it. And I'm agreeing with you, when you look at the element with what you just described it could potentially be evidence of malice. According to the jury instruction and the case law, is it cannot + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +be evidence of probable cause. + +Here is one of the disconnects. I heard Mr. Scarola tell you the two statements he wants to focus on. What he is telling you in a subtle way is that he wants to have a defamation case Publication of two statements, falsity. And then he saidI S i(C ) to you, then the burden shifts, which does in a defamation case. He used defamation words: truth with go• tive. This is not a defamation ca + +It doesn't matter, doesn't matter if they have all th ce in the world that they would won, they would have had a landsl i ory if the Epstein versus Roth and case was tried. It does ake any difference, because the has to be in December 2009 was there gh information? + +I'm not saying, Judge, if you were the lawyer if you would have brought it, or whether I would have brought it, but it was brought. And the question is, was there enough information available that a reasonable person would -- could have + +1 reasonably brought this claim when they did? + +2 3 4 5 6 The timing can be suspect. The motive can be suspect. The malice can be suspect. But if there's enough information and logical inferences, then you don't have a failure of probable cause. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 And the reason that's important underIS the Fifth Amendment is if these three 0 plaintiffs come in and testify, then C.) essentially what we have -- we rying the very original case that ed in 2008, because I have to oss-examine them on all of thei 1 and their damages and thei a lth conditions, and whether they e prostitution before and all of e ther things that would have been tr n that case. + +18 19 20 olestation cases. ( o 40 other le, we then if we open are going to the door to have 43 sexual + +21 22 23 24 25 +11 THE COURT: I'm not suggesting we are doing that. Again, this is not the work of Mr. Scarola. This is not the work of Mr. This is not the work of you or Ms. Rockenbach. This is the work of + +Mr. Epstein -- + +MR. LINK: I agree it is. + +THE COURT: -- making these allegations in subparagraph H, 1 through 3 -- some weird tiny numbers. H, 1 through 3. He's, with all due respect, stuck with these allegations. He's stuck with this lawsuit He's stuck with the claims that are 0 contained therein and the allegation (LPth t are contained therein. + +MR. LINK: Absolutely. 100 percent. But what tuck with? That's the question. Ar e stuck trying this case, Judge are we stuck trying to prove to a information% \$ existed, that we had a Lrb reasona asis to bring a p eding? based on the civil + +0 Because that's what it talks about. It oesn't say what claim did you bring? What count did you bring? What statements did you bring? It is a civil proceeding. + +÷1 + +THE COURT: Right now, though, Mr. Link, we're concentrating on the Fifth Amendment issues. There is not a motion in + +limine in front of me at this juncture as to the 40 other -- or the 40-in-total alleged victims. There is not a motion in front of me regarding how far we are going to go with regard to the trial -- + +MR. LINK: Fair enough Judge. + +THE COURT: -- in regard to the claim of the three litigants represented by 0 Mr. + +C + +MR. LINK: Your Honor is rcent right. I appreciate you in me to answer some of the ques at were on my mind. And I apprec + +Where we wo like to go next, Your Honor, if th has time -- or we can take it up x time -- are those things that we the exhibit list and witness liecr + +O One of the the rulings so far, is will E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe be taking the stand, because that's part of the motion in limine, what we have been talking about. things we don't know, based + +÷n + +THE COURT: Are they listed as witnesses? + +MR. LINK: Pardon me? + +THE COURT: Have they been deposed? + +MR. LINK: They have not been deposed in this case. + +THE COURT: I presume they are listed as witnesses. + +MR. LINK: They are listed as witnesses. + +> ) MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I'm s C y -- + +MR. LINK: Were they depos this case? + +> o4ct MR. SCAROLA: One \ e i" was deposed. + +MR. LINK: I'm \rr + +MR. SCAROLA ne of them was deposed in this case cently. + +MR. L I thought that was -- II, yes. Ytpe right. Sorry about that. One olAce two. + +0 MR. SCAROLA: And the only one noticed be deposed. + +K. + +MR. LINK: And that's an issue that you told us to come back to you on, Judge, because if they are going to be called -- I don't know if they are -- but if they are going to be called, then I would like the + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +opportunity to depose those two. + +THE COURT: What I said somewhat off-the-cuff, but not as articulate as the Second District Court of Appeal in the case of Liabos versus Harman -- L-I-A-B-O-S. ,c, Some of the examples that Your Honor had mentioned, I think, was a massage table, which was number 59. But if we start at the front, there is an order confirmation from Amazon for the purchase of a book entitled + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +ail A mi?eit hat Mr. And th re some articles, which leads m y quickly -- and I think we can bly -- I hate to jump, but I think, d on Your Honor's ruling, it's possible Scarola will agree to item C in the motion in limine, which relates to derogative adjectives when referencing my client. + +"Slave Craft: Workbook for Erotic Slaves and their Owners." Completely irrelevant, prejudicial, has zero probative value whatsoever to do with the malicious prosecution action. + +The same is true -- and I have highlighted all of these -- they are reall grouped, Your Honor. Some of them are so outrageous when you read them, su the erotic book, sex offender rations, massage table, school recor ear books of Jane Doe and -- unide fi year books just of Palm Flight logs, evidence of cont At ti e ns to Palm Beach Gardens PoliG k tment. + +Based on the rulings that you have made this morning, I believe that Mr. Scarola + +probably would agree not to refer to Mr. Epstein as convicted child molester, billionaire pedophile or the like. + +THE COURT: Well, billionaire pedophile, I agree is subject to argument. But convicted child molester, Mr. Scarola. + +MR. SCAROLA: That is an accurate description of Mr. Epstein. It is a (::.; : It' description, which I believe appears in ome of the newspaper articles that stein alleges he relied upon to f asonable belief that Edw c, participant in these this Ponzi scheme. + +THE guilty? ACIQ7' he take a plea of + +MR : Yes. He entered a plea ilty to two felonies. He is a r stered sex offender here in -- + +THE COURT: I just want to make sure it was a guilty plea, as opposed to a nolo or -- + +MR. SCAROLA: No. It was a guilty plea, Your Honor. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +with the federal government, he was required to plead guilty to two state court felonies. + +THE COURT: Mr. Goldberger, did you want to comment on that? + +MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, Your Honor. Just for a point of clarification, neither of the counts that Mr. Epstein pled guiltyS to are, quote, those that suggest that a child molester. It was procuring CI) underage for prostitution. Th- h count. + +So the suggestion counter-plaintiff t molester, there 'no basis in the guilty plea entered. s somehow a child + +Now, h i a registered sex offender subject 403 analysis. Perhaps Counsel be able to go there. But there's no ence to support, based on the documents A÷a nd on the guilty plea, that he's a child molester. He simply didn't plead guilty to anything factually related to that. + +> THE COURT: Tell me exactly what he pled guilty to. + +4 5 6 MR. GOLDBERGER: -- Your Honor, so there's no mistake. Solicitation for prostitution, procuring someone under the age of 18 for prostitution. + +7 8 made it a felony, correct? MR. SCAROLA: Three someones, which + +9 10 11 12 0 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yeah. Solicitation of prostitution requires three in als before it goes from a misde o a felony. + +13 14 TER COURT: s under the age -- alleged vict der the age of 18? + +15 16 17 MR. GO : That's the other count that he ple lty to. Solicitation of prostit of someone under the age of 18. + +18 19 20 The solicitation for prostitution, in r to make that a felony it requires hree separate incidents. + +21 22 23 24 But none of those suggest factually in any way the facts that he was a child molester. That's the point that I think my co-counsel is trying to make. + +document, if I can -- + +THE COURT: Sure. + +the term that was used. + +MR. GOLDBERGER: And that's simply not factually correct. + +THE COURT: Anything else, Mr. Scarola? + +MR. SCAROLA: Since we are dealing with this in the context of Fifth Amendment assertions -- + +AA r + +THE COURT: No, we are dealing wit c ri this as a matter of a portion of the omn bus motion in limine. + +MR. SCAROLA: Then I dpt1 ^t Ere any further comment. + +THE COURT: Thefobj ion is sustained. The motion is gr d. + +As I un a it in reviewing the case law re y the guilty plea would be admissi' The registration of sex der, I am going to need some additional br -fing on. + +A4?..h. MS. ROCKENBACH: And believe me, I've done that, Your Honor. I'm not sure we can take it up today. But Mr. asked this Court to take judicial notice of it and we have supplied a response. + +1 much material within the time -- + +2 MS. ROCKENBACH: I know. + +3 4 5 I think we only addressed part C of the motion in limine. I hoped it would be quick, that's why I brought it up. + +6 THE COURT: Off the record. + +7 (A discussion was held off the record + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 MR. SCAROLA: Getting back to the 0 ) ruling Your Honor just made, I certa C ly have no intention of referring o ffrey Epstein as a convicted chil er when his convictions did not ly relate to child molestation. solicitation of prostitution, mu solicitations for prostitution 1 be sure that I accurately f r to those things when I make refe rer4,No them + +18 <4C THE COURT: Of a minor? sfr + +19 0 MR. SCAROLA: Of minors. + +20 21 22 THE COURT: My understanding of the case law is clear that the plea is admissible. + +23 24 25 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, maybe we should take that up. And I guess we are going to skip exhibits for a minute, because + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +along those lines. But where I thin Scarola is going is 90.610 of orida Evidence Code, which indica when Mr. Epstein is on the s can be asked, Have you ever been vi d of a felony? Yes. t e identity of that felony is no i ible, and that is part of the evil code. Pages 26 and 27 deal derogatory adjectives. That is with the A somewhaCI Y The answer, + +So y not sure -- Your Honor is this has not been fully briefed, -use all that I anticipated were these wo very inflammatory terms. + +Ae't THE COURT: The distinction, though, Ms. Rockenbach, that I would respectfully make -- and I'm not going to suggest that I'm an authority on this particular area - is that typically that question is asked for + +this is too important to just gloss over. + +THE COURT: I don't know if it has been briefed, at least in the briefs that -- + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Probably not the way we would like, but we don't want to paper the court. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +one of credibility, meaning, have you ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: If the answer is yes, the next question is how many times. If there is any falsity to any of those -- either those responses, then the requesting pa has the opportunity to provide the c and potentially the jury, with 1% counter-evidence typically • orm of certified copies of con 'o S. + +A + +MS. ROCKENBACH: correct. + +THE COURT: at's a lot different than in this c e, here we are not necessarily (Lill' a about merely credibi What we're talking about what sense is at -- if not the heart, ainly near the center of the entire + +In other words, but for the fact that -- at least, but for one of the facts that Mr. Epstein was convicted, the context of a malicious prosecution claim and the context of the contentions that would be + +4 5 made by Mr. relating to the malicious prosecution claim would be that his conviction and his legal peril were part of his reasons for bringing the case against Mr. + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +So this is not merely an issue of testing credibility of any given witness. As I understand it, just about any witn can be asked those questions. This U m¢ re of an issue of a fact central presentation of the case. + +MS. ROCEENBACS: + +Mr. Epstein's guilt as June 30th, 2008. His laws nst Mr. was December 7th So the guilty plea was entered at a year and a half before he sued Mr ards. + +(And my concern with this under the achment part of the Florida Evidence ÷Code 610.5 -- I am going to quote from Ehrhardt, 2016 version, When a witness who testifies as a criminal defendant there is a danger -- we are not even a criminal defendant. We are not even trying the criminal case -- but there's danger that the + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +A÷c + +onvicted of a crime? How MR. SCW 1 s. Rockenbach is incorrect tLt gee/would seek to admit this evidenc ely under 90.610, because under rovision of the evidence code, we d be restricted to, Have you ever been many times? I understand that entirely. And that's strictly a matter of credibility. + +jury will consider the convictions, which are admitted, only to impeach as evidence the defendant is a bad person. The concern is greater when there are number of prior convictions. + +But the point is, this is bad character evidence under 90.404. It's improper impeachment under 90.610. And we absol k oppose and object to the guilty plea com ng into evidence. It has no relev to the issue of why my client file cious prosecution action a e half after he pled guilty. + +THE COURT: S arola. + +However, the issue that we have the burden of proving is an issue of probable cause. And that involves, as we have + +explained in great detail, an analysis of what Mr. Epstein knew. Part of what Mr. Epstein knew when he sued is that he was guilty of multiple crimes involving sexual activity with minors. That's part of what he knew. He pled guilty to that. + +Now, he was asked in deposition, are the minors that you pled guilty Objection. Fifth Amendment. answer on the grounds that to end to incriminate me. He ref \Y t identify those people. + +4÷other through his own testimony he has foreclosed any further evidence coming from him. Now, he can get up and try to rebut adverse inference through something than his own testimony, because + +> But if there's some independent source where he can suggest to the jury that this is not a proper inference to draw, he wasn't + +> Well, we ca aw 'an adverse inference from that. adverse inference we can draw is tha t three people were L.M., E.W. an e Doe. + +1 2 3 pleading guilty to crimes committed against these three young women -- these three children at the time -- then he can do that. + +4 5 6 7 8 But it is relevant and material to the issue of probable cause because he admitted sexual offenses relating to children and refuses to identify in the context of this,A case who those children are. + +9 10 11 12 So this isn't just propensity. Thi isn't bad character. This is ce that is directly material to an of this case that we are oblige p 0 + +13 14 15 So your Honor' e on was absolutely correct. There of er reasons why this comes in in c ext of this case. + +16 Thank u sir. + +17 18 NiStAWKENBAC red0S?fr H: Your Honor, may I + +19 A'ek0O THE COURT: Sure. + +20 21 22 23 24 MS. ROCKENBACH: In Mr. Epstein's deposition, March 17th, 2010, on page 103, Mr. Scarola asked him, line 23, "Who is the minor that you procured for prostitution?" And the answer is, "I do not know." + +N -- both sides cited it. And it talks about what constitutes that probable cause. The public record. The public record. So my client can rely on two parts. Rely on firsthand knowledge or trustworthy information provided to him. That's the + +issue. + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. I do stand corrected. I am remembering now that that was his response. It wasn't the Fifth Amendment assertion. It changes none of the arguments I've just made. + +THE COURT: I understand. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, the i of whether my client pled guilty to C prostitution with one minor or of snot relevant to what facts and ances - and that's the phrase o e cases reported -- what fa circumstances were known to Mr/ n!". when he filed his malicious prcas + +And th Jight versus Yorco (phonetic) case. e event talked about it, but + +( 1S71E COURT: I'm familiar with it. + +0 MS. ROCKENBACH: I'm sure, Your Honor. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Razorback lawsuit. That's Mr. Bill Scherer, the Fort Lauderdale attorney being quoted by the newspaper as saying that Epstein -- Rothstein didn't act alone. It's the head of the South Florida FBI saying this was not a one-man show. + +The issue of my client's plea of guild has nothing to do with his probable cau whether he believed Mr. was v connection with Mr. Rothstein fing up the claims. + +THE COURT: One th' preciate the appellate courts do' ntly is writing somewhat extensi o the fluidity of motions in 1 nd the fact that until the court c gest at trial all of the facts tare being presented in putting things into context, it makes it what difficult, and recognizes the trial ''court's difficulty in dealing with some of these motions and some of these issues without context. + +> But, in my respectful view, the flaw of the argument from its inception -- again, I'm not trying to be disrespectful -- but + +the flaw in the argument is what I perceive to be a lack of recognition of, not only Mr. Epstein's rationale for filing his suit, but the focus, or lack thereof, on Mr. ' responsibility and burden -- a strict one and a strong one according to onerous -- used by one of the cases in being able to prove probable cause here. O + +And Mr. Scarola has used in his briefing this building-block ap .. And I think the same type of an- picture can be utilized here wh ing about the motive. What was t pr le cause in actuality from t ou er-plaintiff he did? for Epstein doing what + +dicated before, but didn't use nalogy, what you and Mr. Link provided he Court provides, not only building locks for potentially Mr. Epstein's probable cause, but likewise provides building blocks for Mr. . proving that he did not have probable cause. + +And as far as the Court is concerned, if the guilty plea came after he filed suit, 1 2 3 4 then there might be some reasonable argument to separate it out and say, Judge, he hadn't even filed suit -- the suit was filed -- strike that. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +He hadn't pled guilty. The guilty plea came three years after he filed this suit for malicious prosecution, then it would probably be a relevancy argument that m may not win the day. + +C.) + +But when looking at it fro uilding block type of analysis, as n the most simplest terms, in• i g at both sides, which I it from mbent to do, as Mr. Scarola allu to, this is but one item that could b gu to have fueled Mr. Epstein o ave filed this lawsuit, thus making levant. + +Now, the fluidity issue that I spoke t is, I'm willing to look at it, again, ÷ f there's a case on point that specifically says otherwise. But for purposes of this particular matter, the Court would find absent the production of a case that would say otherwise, that Mr. Epstein's guilty pleas -- I understand it's combined, so I'm + +1 2 3 4 5 not suggesting there were more than one combined plea -- would be relevant, that it would be relevant to the issue of probable cause, and it would be relevant, potentially, to the issue of malice. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 And that, again -- with the Court looking at it from both sides and analyzinS it from both sides, it could be used by O Mr. Mr. Epstein. . But It could it provides be used by le c st some relevancy, defined again as or tending to prove or dis material fact. The material ct the element of probable cause a er aps malice. + +15 16 So agai going to rule that they would be a ble. + +17 Ne sue, please. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 pejorative comments. I understand that again, we are going to completely <4ce;But entirely stay away from any type of sometimes things are said in the heat of deposition that would never be repeated at trial. Again, I'm certainly ordering that that not take place. + +25 All right. We want to go back to some + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +of these -- in the time that we have left, let's go back to some of these exhibits and see if we can work through them. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. We had identified and have highlighted, starting with number three, photographs and information of Mr. Epstein's homes, planes, automobiles. I'm not sure what relevan malicious that would prosecution have as to action. why he filed a C + +THE COURT: Let's take e at a time. + +Mr. Scarola, w r position? + +MR. SCAROLA is omes and his automobiles v' ence with respect to his pecuniary c c stances, obviously a relevan ter when we are talking about a py ive damage claim. + +OTHE COURT: Typically, though, net orth is what is considered, not necessarily unless it's impeachment, i.e., you'll have a picture of a home that he owns in the US Virgin Islands -- I think that he has some connection with one of those islands. And I'm not trying to + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +suggest anything as far as anything inappropriate. But I can conceive of this situation that if Mr. Epstein testifies that his net worth is X, comprised of A, B and C in large part, but you find an asset that he has not taken into account that's worth twice as much of his claimed net worth -- I + +MR. SCAROLA: I know he has a mini net worth of -- + +C + +I don't mean to interrupt but Mr. Epstein refuses to any evidence with regard to n, worth, so we are obliged to offe it stantial evidence of his net worth less and until those objections b Fifth Amendment grounds are overrul the basis that they are non-tes i 1. Honor, + +(STHE y COURT: I think that's another motion. a subject + +A'itok MS. ROCKENBACH: It is, Your Honor. + +MR. SCAROLA: It is. But Your Honor should not be deciding this issue on the basis of the premise that we are going to get evidence from Mr. Epstein as to what Mr. Epstein's net worth is. + +THE COURT: Agreed. + +MR. SCAROLA: All he has told us is he's willing to stipulate to a net worth in excess of \$100 million. Well, it makes a difference as to whether it's 100 million, 200 million or a thousand million, that is, a billion dollars, or \$2 billion. + +So even if we're left with a Fifth O Amendment assertion, we are back to \$ame issue that was that is, there raised by the d needs to be and dence independent of the Fift rent assertion that would allow th nce to be -- + +THE COURT: oing to cut you off. I'm going to e r n number three. + +Number oo r is the Amazon receipt for the "SM A Realistic Introduction, Craft: Roadmap for Erotic itude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and ATI?h, 'Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners." + +MR. SCAROLA: I never read it. + +Your Honor, if I might -- + +MS. ROCKENBACH: It has no relevance, + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 discussed, referenced, admitted. I think it's also a receipt from Amazon for the book, by the way. It's an order confirmation. If my memory serves correct, it's a receipt for the purchase of a book. It has nothing to do with malicious prosecution. + +8 + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (:54 IRY MR. SCAROLA: In fact, it does. CI might explain to Your Honor th ma y of the items that are on this list e being challenged, a vast majo them, were part of an appendix motion for summary judgment t Ffas not defended against by M s in. + +16 17 18 THE CO Let me ask you this. Was this pa lar exhibit located prior to the stAliSsing filed by Mr. Epstein? + +19 OMR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +20 21 A'ek MS. ROCKENBACH: It's the receipt located by whom? + +22 23 THE COURT: By anybody. For the purposes of this case. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: These are items -- + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola. + +1 2 discovered in a lawsuit that was filed prior to Mr. Epstein filing this suit? + +3 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. It was + +4 5 6 7 8 discovered when a search warrant was executed by law enforcement shortly after the criminal allegations were made against Mr. Epstein before any of the civil lawsui were filed. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0 P So law enforcement gets probabl C ca se to execute a search warrant on stein's home. And one of the thing found -- or many of the g that are described here are ring the course of the executio tha search warrant and formed proba c for the criminal charges aga s Mr. Epstein. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 re significantly, they formed asis for the civil lawsuits that were d on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, hat is, this is all evidence taken into account in substantiating the validity of the claims of these three particular victims of Mr. Epstein. + +24 25 And all of these things are delineated in the motion for summary judgment that + +1 2 3 Mr. Epstein does not defend against and voluntarily dismisses his case on the eve of the hearing. + +4 5 6 7 8 Your Honor is well aware of procedurally he would have been obliged well in advance of the hearing to file his opposition to the motion for summary AQ IS Y judgment. He doesn't do that. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (::) Why is that significant in the ont xt of this case? Because, as we eard from the defense, they are challenge whether there 7)Ona fide termination of the alnst Mr. Mit e in favor of Mr. rd Was the abuse of process cla m' aced circumstance au to indicate a bona fide termina under such + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 How do we make that decision? Well, only way to make that decision is to ÷ alk about the motion for summary judgment, what supported the motion for summary judgment, and the fact that the motion for summary judgment was not opposed. A voluntary dismissal was taken, and the statute of limitations permitted to expire + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +without ever refiling those claims. + +So as long as bona fide termination remains an issue, the motion for summary judgment is clearly relevant and material. And this is all part of the motion for summary judgment. + +Many of these things, in addition to Act"r that, forms the basis for the explanati Mr. ' conduct when he was a m RRA, and demonstrate that he w abusing the process in any respect hile he was prosecuting these c He was pursuing very relev- material avenues of discovery to admissibl ce. calculated to lead + +So tha (::6 's y full response to this. + +The objection is sustained o grounds: on relevancy and also 403 ysis. + +I will entertain the introduction outside the presence of the jury, if it becomes necessary. + +The other concern I have is that, at best, it appears to sound like it may be impeachment on a collateral matter, + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +collateral to the summary judgment -- the + +summary judgment motion was made and then + +not challenged. For those reasons, I'm + +going to sustain the objection at this time, + +again, subject to context for being able to + +readdress it, if necessary. + +MR. SCAROLA: Number four is sustaineSS + +THE COURT: Yes, sir, for the reas stated in the record. + +MR. SCAROLA: Understood. + +THE COURT: The NPA, I ready indicated that the incl' o would be - if properly predica ould be allowed. on, tcJo complainants -- I don't see an w t would be grounds for objecti that? The Jane Doe, the + +MS : I'm not sure what the ance is. I'm not the proponent of the ence, but I don't see what relevance here would be of Jane Doe's complaint. + +The relevance in this malicious prosecution action might be the allegations of this complaint, this action. But when we start bringing in other complaints as exhibits for a jury to read, I think that + +1 goes far afield from -- + +2 3 THE COURT: This is the same Jane Doe or a different Jane Doe? + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Same Jane Doe. + +5 THE COURT: Overruled. + +6 Next issue. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, Your Honor. + +8 9 There are two Jane Does. This is Jane 102. + +10 11 Jane Doe 102 was a Bob Jos g client. + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 And just so I orie Honor with regard to this matt r the terms of the non-prosecut\* a eement, the federal court appoin e Josefsberg as counsel on (:.,01 behalf of a represented victims to protect interest of unrepresented ms turn the terms of the prosecution agreement. + +20 21 22 23 One of those multiple victims being represented by Mr. Josefsberg was an individual identified as Jane Doe 102. She has since been publicly identified as + +24 + +C.) + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +complaint include the transport of Jane Doe Number 2 on Mr. Epstein's private jets to various homes owned by Mr. Epstein in various locations inside and outside the United States. + +THE COURT: She's expected to be a witness? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: Live witness? + +A÷In olested onboard the airplane, and that she was prostituted out to third parties onboard the airplane, which provided the basis for Mr. seeking airplane logs and the testimony of pilots and the testimony of others identified in the flight logs as MR. S : May I just finish my argumen to why this complaint was of ficance? Because she does -- she does ge in the complaint that she was + +MR. SCAROLA: Live. + +THE COURT: At this o going to find that, if, in fact, a witness, that it would be cu and hence I am going to sustai jection on those grounds. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +being present on the plane. + +THE COURT: That's fine. I don't have a problem with Mr. testifying. If it becomes an issue in terms of credibility or whatever it might be, then I will take another look at it. But on the basis of the arguments that I have heard, the objecti O on provided. is sustained for the reasons that I + +MR. SCAROLA: Understood. + +II. ROCEENHACH: before we leave, based on You ruling, I would make an ore tenu tion for leave to depose Virginia Rob , cause now it has become clear that s going to be testifying, based o IIN. Scarola's statement and Your s ruling. + +OTHE COURT: Wasn't she scheduled to 'come to court from Australia? Wasn't that the lady? + +MR. SCAROLA: That's where she's living. She was scheduled to come to court. She was available to be deposed previously. They chose not to take her deposition. She + +has been listed as a witness for years in this matter. + +THE COURT: You'll have to do a written motion. But I want to be consistent with what I said recently, and that is that it's not -- the continuance is not -- and I emphasize not -- designed to be a wholesal4 reopening of discovery; that the Court take that up on an issue-by-issue ba but, without pre-deciding anyt g, unless it can be demonstrated to t that there was unavailabilit there was a late filing, that t some type of inability of a w o testify, something along those + +These sses have been listed for a lengthy od of time. Again, this was not urpose of as not the import of the order of the i?4Court. the motion that was filed and + +Let's talk about number seven. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Messages taken from message pads found at Mr. Epstein's home. + +THE COURT: What do the messages say? + +1 2 3 4 sexual massages with minors. I can't tell you from memory -- but Mr. may be able to -- whether there are specific references to our three clients. + +5 6 7 THE COURT: Not to be overly technical serving as co-counsel? A(54Ar or hypertechnical here, is Mr. + +8 9 10 11 12 Isy MR. SCAROLA: Yes, Your Honor. I've told Your Honor before, we don' anticipate him taking an activ trial, but he remains as co record in this case. in the of + +13 THE COURT: Fai + +14 15 Mr. on that? ha you like to comment + +16 17 18 19 20 MR. message Sure, Your Honor. include the names of many The of nderaged females that visited and set ppointments at Mr. Epstein's home, ncluding L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. + +21 22 23 THE COURT: Have they been authenticated by Mr. Epstein? Or did he take the Fifth on that? + +24 25 MR. : He has taken the Fifth on questions related to that. They have been + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +authenticated in other depositions by Detective Vicari, although those were taken in other cases. But he's an available witness who could testify as to the chain of custody, where he found the message -- where he found the messages and how he gathered them during the search warrant. + +ettled the three lawsuits in which he represented those three women. But they are not relevant in the malicious prosecution case whether my client had probable cause to file this action or not. Or malice. MS : Your Honor, may I This is inflammatory. These message may be relevant had Mr. not + +We are definitely getting far afield in + +THE COURT: The relevancy, Mr. Sca + +MR. SCAROLA: They clearly rela the validity of the claims on b these three victims of Mr. They corroborate that these •men were there at his home o an ccasions, and along with a lar umber of other underaged females who ng routinely molested by Mr Epstein + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 terms of the exhibits. And it looks like - and I understand why Mr. would want to try exhibits that were relevant to his clients' action because the exhibits that should be relevant in the malicious prosecution case are the facts and circumstance, or the lack of facts and circumstances on which my client relied filing this lawsuit -- the civil act the civil proceeding. + +11 12 13 14 15 appointments are absolu Message pads regardink 49 9.403 prejudicial and not prejudicial effect clearly o hs any remote probative va his action. + +16 17 18 19 MR. S are goi : It seems to me that we nfortunately, around the same rry bush. The validity of the claims n issue. + +20 21 22 23 24 In addition to that, the viability of the claims against Mr. Epstein from a criminal perspective is part of why he was so concerned about this non-prosecution agreement being set aside. + +1 2 3 4 5 evidence that would prove that he was a serial child molester, that there were dozens and dozens of victims of his molestations, which were occurring multiple times a day, day after day after day. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 And the only way he could foresee at this point in escaping the criminal exposu that was clearly going to result in 0 convictions, because of this mountai C of evidence available, was to scar the one person who was challenging non-prosecution agreemen4Lphr3Ugh the Crime Victims' Rights Act + +14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: ASg. ping to defer on ruling on this mentioned d opening statements. And it is goin be determined by the Court in ontext in which I believe it would be ssary. it is not to be + +20 21 22 23 24 And I'm concerned about first -- as I mentioned earlier on in another exhibit - that this is collateral. That it would constitute impeachment on a collateral matter. + +25 Again, I don't want to get back into 1 2 3 serial child molestation. I believe words to that effect were just utilized, so that's the reason for the ruling. + +4 5 6 7 8 9 I think that right now, based upon what I'm looking at, which is not the actual messages, but just the recitation of an exhibit would be that there -- that any ?I probative value would be materially outweighed by the prejudice. + +10 11 12 13 14 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank yo Yo r Honor. We are working off of Mr. E exhibit list. And the next one i t, documents related to Mr. Epsteg p uced by Alfredo Rodriguez. + +15 16 THE CO A(4947:do was the houseperson I'm understanding? Rodriguez + +17 MStROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +18 19 20 S THE r COURT: I don't know what that (4 . What specifically are we talking bout? + +21 22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: We're talking about a book that contains a list of Jeffrey Epstein's victims, their names and telephone numbers, as well as a number of other contacts that Jeffrey Epstein has, who, + +AA ? + +(:.! r + +1 2 through other evidence, were established to be regular guests in his home. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 These provided corroboration of the testimony of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. They provided evidence of the extent of Mr. Epstein's molestation of children, which obviously supports the magnitude of the wrong in which he was engaged, which go-a directly to the punitive value of th cl ims brought by L.M., E.W. and Jane that is, a jury faced with the task g a determination as to the late amount of punitive damages, eructed that they shall take into i eration the magnitude of the wrong at includes the total number of s involved in the offender's wrongdo + +18 19 20 21 22 HE COURT: I 'judge in that division had found a valid claim for punitive damages in terms of those cases that we are dealing with here? presume that by the time case was settled that I or a predecessor + +23 24 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. There were multiple punitive damages claims pending. + +I just didn't know the timing. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor's question got us directly to the point. This is relevant evidence for punitive damages in Mr. ' clients' cases, not in this case. + +THE COURT: My concerns are, again that we are going too far afield. again, my best efforts are to t, y f% keep this as a level playing fie to focusing on the claimer \ are this particular cas 141( e malicious prosec n ase. it comes made eing the in + +And whi tw and I have already indicated - I believe Epstein's counsel has con that it cannot be sanitized, ill not be sanitized, because it goes r any of the issues that are involved ere -- and by way of Mr. recitations, through Mr. Scarola, the motives that Mr. Epstein may have had to file the action at bar. + +But at the same time I am going to rule in the same way as I did as to number seven, + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +and that is that I find that under 403 that the probative value -- any probative value is materially outweighed by the prejudice involved. + +MR. SCAROLA: May I ask a rhetorical question, Your Honor? + +THE COURT: Sure. AS AY + +Isof MR. SCAROLA: When Mr. Epstein all that these cases were ginned up, w alleges that asking in the com for \$50 million (sic) was total q of line Akso and supportive of his c s ns that this was a fabricated cl tructed solely for the purposes su orting -- knowingly supporting a i cheme -- when he alleges that these s really had no significant value, an we not talk about what the ive damage value of the cases were and they had enormous punitive damage value hen they are claims relating to a vast number of molestations by a billionaire? + +THE COURT: Because we are dealing with the three cases that Mr. represented these three individuals. And to allow records, information about anybody else at + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +this juncture would, in my view, be collateral to the allegations made by Epstein in his claim. + +And there's no contention here that Mr. , for whatever reason, went on some type of organized witch hunt so as to persecute or threaten Mr. Epstein with pro of other cases, proof of other alleged O molestations, documents that are at ssu or anything of that nature. + +MR. SCAROLA: That's e hat was alleged, sir. It was a hat was pursuin is ery with regard to molestations ther children that took place on an n when none of Brad 1 n were ever molested on the at he had no reasonable basis that. + +OTHE COURT: 7\ ngaging in a negative, proving up a negative. Now, it seems to me we're + +MR. SCAROLA: You lost me. + +THE COURT: You understand what I'm trying to say? + +THE COURT: If none of Mr. • clients were molested on an airplane, then it seems to me to be conceding my point, and that is, then there's no reason for these other issues to be introduced, because there's nobody that Mr. represented that was molested on an airplane. + +MR. SCAROLA: That's exactly my po sir. That's the defense argument. + +THE COURT: Show me where MR. SCAROLA: That's t se argument that this was -nt discovery. + +THE COURT: Sh ere that's in the complaint about of er alleged victims. + +MR. S e'll have that for you in just a m , Your Honor. + +Let me take a look at that ee how it may or may not be conjecture. + +OMR. SCAROLA: While we are finding -4! ,>tthat we will have that for you in just a moment -- Your Honor may recall that I referenced earlier -- and I have, unfortunately, misplaced the copy of the federal statute. I should have it -- I should have it in just a moment. + +THE COURT: I mean, I'm looking at paragraphs 17 and 18, for example, where Mr. Epstein alleges, while relative to this action, Epstein is currently named as defendant in three civil actions alleging sexual assault and battery that were handled by RRA and his attorneys, including Edward ,41 prior to its implosion -- presuming he RRA's and not Mr. ' implosion of which was filed in federal c r -- and the two in state court that already identified. The civil were filed in August and Septembe + +Paragraph 1 en 'says, quote, What is clear is a f t and improper investment conduct Ponzi scheme was, in fact, d operated by RRA and certain of amed defendants, which scheme directly cted Epstein as a named defendant in hese civil actions -- referencing the three at issue. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: Where is -- + +MR. SCAROLA: Paragraphs 35 and 36. + +4 5 6 7 Paragraph 35 states, quote, For instance, the litigation team relentlessly and knowingly pursued flight data and passenger manifests regarding flights Epstein took with these famous individuals knowing full and no illicit activities took place. 4104 Ast\y well that no underaged women were on board + +8 9 10 11 12 Rothstein and the litigation team inappropriately attempted to take tht depositions of these celebriti calculated effort to bolste rketing scam that was taking pl quote. + +13 Next paragraph. + +14 MR. SCAROLA ext paragraph. + +15 16 THE CO te, One of the plaintiffs sel -- strike that. + +17 18 19 20 On plaintiff's counsel, I ed three of Epstein's pilots and sought deposition of a fourth pilot currently erving in Iraq. + +21 22 23 24 25 The pilots were deposed by for over 12 hours, and never asked one question relating to or about L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, RRA's clients, as it related to transportation on flights of RRA clients on + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +any of Epstein's planes. + +But asked many inflammatory, leading and irrelevant questions about the pilots' thoughts and beliefs, which will never be admissible at trial, which could only have been asked for the purpose of pumping the cases, and thus by using the deposition to sell the cases or a part them to third parties. End quote. + +Anything else? + +MR. SCAROLA: Those ar obvious references in the comply conduct on the part of Brad Ed leged to have been improper a ng part of the basis for abuse of nce claims. + +THE C The Court's ruling remains the sa4.?illy 11 + +( 4S MR. y SCAROLA: I never like to argue r the Court has already ruled, but there Al'il ts one additional point that I want to make. + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I have cited in -- we have cited in submissions to the Court, specifically the motion in limine addressing the scope of admissible evidence + +that we have filed. We have cited the provisions of Florida statute 90.404, subsection two, commonly known as the + +Rule statute, which talks about evidence of other crimes. + +We have also cited the Federal Rules of Evidence, rule 415. And that rule express permits the introduction in evidence of molestation of other children in any fed ral action, criminal or civil, invo 1 the molestation of a child. + +Congress explained in the submission t effected by thes is critical to the protection o 4Z 7 blic from rapists and child moles r It's justified by the distincIkl!Ny characteristics of the cases to it applies. )an 'quote, That urt -- the reform + +0 In child molestation cases, a history similar acts tends to be exceptionally probative, because it shows an unusual disposition of a defendant, a sexual or pseudosexual interest in children that simply does not exist in ordinary people. + +÷f + +on child victims, whose credibility can readily be intact in the absence of substantial corroboration. + +In such cases, there is a compelling public interest in admitting all significant evidence that will shed some light on the credibility of the change excuse me - the charge and any denial by the defens + +(464.) + +So -- + +C.) + +THE COURT: And Mr. Scaro we were trying a sexual molestation here may be a stronger argument. the very point that I'm making is t re not trying a sexual molestati per. + +Now, th a be elements and issues that may ar depending upon the nature of Mr. Eps s position relative to these However, it does not change the t's view that these messages taken from message pad at Epstein's home relate to others and that the documents related to Epstein produced by his houseman, Mr. Rodriguez, that relate to others, remains irrelevant. And any probative value, if found to be relevant, would be + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +materially outweighed by the prejudice. + +The Court's decision remains the same. + +I think it's bolstered by the fact that we + +are not trying the child molestation case. + +And the significance of the collateral cases + +is not, in my respectful view, necessarily a + +touchstone of this particular case and thi + +particular analysis. + +C P + +0 We are going to have to call it a d y. + +I thank you very much, again, ur + +arguments and your input, wj11 r1Fand oral. + +Thank you, again. + +Again, thanks ourt reporter and + +our courtroom pe ne also for their hard + +work and cou + +Have a~ood rest of the week. We will + +see you , if not before, on + +er 5th. + +A'it.i;:!) MR. LINK: Thank you for your time. + +> THE COURT: We will take up the + +remaining issues of evidence first, and then + +we will go back to the schedule, which I + +very much appreciate you all providing. We + +will adhere to that schedule as we continue + +We will be in recess. + +- - - + +(The above proceedings were + +concluded at 3:55 p.m.) + +A Cos + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +### COURT CERTIFICATE + +STATE OF FLORIDA : SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) + +I, SONJA D. , certify that I was authorized to and did stenographically repor foregoing proceedings and that the transc c true record of my stenographic notes + +> Dated this 1st y " CIS9 Sfe As " December 2017. + +> > SONJA D. + ++0 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da3bf9217ac7edb2fed2195ed971eccf61254a8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905/EFTA02762905.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,6764 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02762905.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 193, + "chars": 176514, + "elapsed_seconds": 32.66, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 320.049 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 347.34 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 347.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 202.06494140625, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 202.06494140625, + 102.463134765625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 102.463134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURT CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 370.9433898925781, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 370.9433898925781, + 75.22210693359375 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 75.22210693359375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02762905" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdcf92a47c82b9d047ea44d50df22cc06e54fa6b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.md @@ -0,0 +1,390 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., C individually, + +Defendants, + +-4L< E9 + +## COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. ME, SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-P ff J. and hereby files his Amended Exhibit List as follows: + +- O. No objection +- I. All objections +- 2. All objectio +- 3. Irrele pt authenticity material +- 4. Probvealue substantially outwei ed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +## O OBJECTIONS + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Second Amended Exhibit List + +| No. 1. 2. 3. | Counter-Plaintiff Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification All applicable criminal statutes. All applicable Florida Statutes. airplanes and automobiles. AS | +|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase 0 of books SM 101: A Realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abema A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. \ | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. | +| 7. | Messages taken from m *ound at Epstein's home. | +| 8. | Documents relat Epstein produced by Alfredo Rod | +| 9. | Jeffrey Ep 's flight logs. | +| 10. | Je Epst 's phone records. | +| 11. | len's phone records. | +| 1 | isitation Logs. 13. Y Jeffrey Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection, 01/18/10. | + +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's | +|--------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | +| | OO 1S | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epste' | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High Sc k. | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach Hi ear Book. | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gar chool Year Book. | +| 27. | Affidavit and A t or Search Warrant | +| | on Jeffrey Epste 's h e (from Palm Beach | +| | State Attorney's , Exhibit #29). | +| 28. | Note s fo nd in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or | +| | d ' trash ulls outside of his home during | +| 29. ,÷ | g ' aim Beach State Attorney's Criminal file | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | + +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | + +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits re against | +| | Jeffrey Epstein and 464488k | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report is) | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department I Report dated | +| 49. | All reports and docume ge rated by Palm | +| | Beach Police Dep t to Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 50. | All Witness Stat en erated by Palm | +| | Beach Police nt relating to Jeffrey | +| 51. | P er i ests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft | +| 52. | nger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintirs, J M, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| | Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant. | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated | +| | 07/25/06 (unredacted) Aetisc | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. () | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Co I i Control and Probation. | +| 63. | Jef₹'rey Epstein's Sex Offender Regis 11s , m various states). | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking ph p | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL B Y, | +| | PALM BEACH FL O. e | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey E use contacts. | +| 67. | Documen tt lated itlir to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | +| 68. | Lett m ief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler. | +| 69. | .. , B h Police Department Incident Report dated 06 (redacted)D | +| | tter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/11/06. | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/13/06. | + +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 02/17/06. | | | | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 04/06/06. | | | | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 04/10/06. | | | | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger, 06/22/06. | | | | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. | | | | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for Vanessa [REDACTED]. | | | | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents. | | | | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties. | | | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of Sarah Kellen. | | | | +| 81. | Police report regarding [REDACTED] picking up money dated 11-28-04. | | | | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. | | | | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute 90.410. | | | | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 04/17/06. | | | | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | | | | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | | | | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | | | | + +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 89. | Flight information for | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: Maria. | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case. | +| | 404 A | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5t^ Amendment Speech. | +| 94. | Reiter IC:4).( letter to Krisher, 05/01/06. | +| 95. | Police Report, 11/28/04. | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts. \ | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter to Virgi % a re , 09/03/08 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi e t J y Epstein's | +| 99. | Victim's Medical R Dr. Randee Speciale. | +| 100. | All surveillance ondu t d by law | +| | enforcement on Epstein's home. | +| 101. | Emails re c rom Palm Beach Records | +| | rel to Je y Epstein. | +| \ | A | +| | et em listed on the Palm Beach Police Property | +| | Mil Lists and/or Property Receipts. | +| \ | II copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police | + +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped | +|------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records | +| | party to this cause. AeAsk | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not | +| 109. | reserves all objections to Epstein' | +| 110. | reserves the right to supplem | +| III. | By listing an Exhibit, Edward no ving | +| | his right to object to same at a oes not | +| | waive their right to ame e. | +| 112. | All exhibits listed subject to | +| 113. | All pleadi and a chments in the action | +| | under the ictims Rights Act prosecuted | +| | by B ley wards on behalf of victims of | +| | E 's criminal molestations. | +| | Ed s' Motions for Summary Judgment, all | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses | + +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the | +|------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein | +| | and victims of his sexual molestation. 4' | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced | +| 121. | Photo depicting Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein o | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendan all emails | +| 124. | Evidence of contributio e Palm Beach Police | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. J n rt Report, Attachments and | +| | Back-up Docum ts, tober 20, 2017. | +| 126. | Jeffrey EpsI rks . Scott Rothstein, J. | +| | and ., C plaint, December 7, 2009. | +| 127. | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +| | and , Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +| | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Fourth | + +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records | +| 131. | Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: l' | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Ho | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (sign | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the S ml r. | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Col Photo Virginia | +| 137. | Color photo of V im its on ferry "New York". | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Tii Square. | +| 139. | Virgi "tt Ro crt photo on back of ship. | +| 140. | room in New York. | +| 141. | photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch). | +| 142. | Color photo of at Zorro Ranch | +| 143. | photo on horse front of ranch. | +| 144. | photo standing against rocks (red | + +| 145. | standing against rocks (red coat) (far) | +|------|---------------------------------------------| +| | (with back photo back date). | +| 146. | photo riding horse blue jacket far. | +| 147. | photo on side of horse hand up. | +| 148. | photo on side of horse. Ad ak' | +| 149. | photo outside next to tables. | +| 150. | photo red coat leaning on rail. | +| 151. | photo standing outside next to | +| 152. | photo standing in front o | +| 153. | photo with hand ov | +| 154. | photo standi t td piano. | +| 155. | photo ' fireplace (museum). | +| 156. | o nt of wagon in museum. | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of museum | +| | exhibition ( Fe, New Mexico). | +| 158. | Pho ph i pain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine | +| 159. | is (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2. | +| 160. | Cover photo book 2. | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | + +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo | M). | +|------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| 165. | steps with trees overhead. | | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo | | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo | | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo | ). | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo .1). | C) " | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photo | and black). | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo | and blac‘ :I. ms) | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo | an | +| 173. | on steps with chi | ' ck photo | +| 174. | on street | (far) (with back | +| | photo and black). | | +| 175. | Travel envelope. | | +| 176. | Singapore Airlin | el Cover with handwritten notes | +| | by Virginia ' i its. | | +| 177. | Thai Hott Receipts. | | +| 178. | o D ket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein. | | +| 17 | List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the | | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of | in | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition. | | + +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File). | | | | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 185. | Airport Codes ( Demonstrative ). | | | | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | | | | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1. | | | | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05. | | | | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account. | | | | +| 190. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files). | | | | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005. | | | | +| 192. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED]: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement. | | | | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997). | | | | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | + +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09. | +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. ,O4.14/\1 1 | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. | +| 201. | Passport application; issued January 12, 2001. CO % | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 203. | Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez. ,S ) | +| 204. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez,, | +| 205. | .‘ Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's pro es and planes. | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein e y and former | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein G " ocuments. | +| 208. | Palm Beach Count C e Attorney's Response to Public | +| | Records R including audio recordings). | +| 209. | Any d all nses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with | +| | o th eposition. | +| 210. | errogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to | +| 211. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 213. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. + Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition. | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | | | | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | | | | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | | | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action. | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + Florida Bar No.: 169440 + Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and + mep@searcylaw.com + Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + Phone: (561) 686-6300 + Fax: (561) 383-9451 + Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J , Second Amended Exhibit List + +J. , Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Alk " + +,1O + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 C O efiling®tonjahaddad.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +iS 5) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein c + +?S' \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c02290fca8f8230c49fd48f40930a75854aac192 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098/EFTA02763098.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,713 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763098.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 18, + "chars": 28468, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 496.56732177734375, + 74.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 496.56732177734375, + 128.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 128.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. ME, \nSECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 375.45799999999997 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 404.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 404.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 444.92600000000004 + ], + [ + 376.2295837402344, + 444.92600000000004 + ], + [ + 376.2295837402344, + 459.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 459.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 135.27 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763098" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763116/EFTA02763116.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763116/EFTA02763116.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..496839f12eca7f6cce2a3d239ebd3afebf7018f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763116/EFTA02763116.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually + +Defendants + +FILED +2010 MS-3 PM 6:16 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME +TO SERVE WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST AND +REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE** + +THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Witness and Exhibit List and Request for Status Conference, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED: + +The granted to the extent the parties are given an additional 20 days from this date to the Witness and Exhibits lists. A status conference is scheduled for August 20, 2010 @ 1:30 p.m., Ctrm 9C. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of August, 2010 at Palm Beach County, + +Florida. + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +Circuit Court Judge + +Copies furnished: + +L. Ackerman, Esq. umett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Fistos & Lehrman, PL West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5012 Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 23:21-24:17 | | 23:21-24:17(R) | | +| 25:16-24 | | | | +| 26:8-27:3 | | | | +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | | 31:10-15 (R) | | +| 31:20-23 | | 31:20-23 (R) | | +| 36:6-16 | | 36:6-16 (R) | | +| 38:18-24 | | 38:18-24 (R) | | +| 43:4-10 | | 43:4-10 (R) | | +| 45:13-25 | | 45:13-25 (R) | | +| | 49:10-15 | | | +| | 49:17-22 | | | +| | 50:1-4 | | | +| | 51:22-52:14 | | | +| 53:4-54:4 | | 53:4-54:4 (R) | | +| 54:9-10 | | 54:9-10 (R) | | +| 54:14-22 | | 54:14-22 (R) | | +| 55:10-21 | | 55:10-21 (R) | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | | 57:7-25 (R) | | +| 58:11-15 | | 58:11-15 (R) | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | | 63:25-64:15(R) | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| | 79:7-79:23 | | | +| | 80:9-16 | | | +| | 80:23-24 | | | +| | 81-16-20 | | | +| | 82:17-83:3 | | | +| | 83:8-22 | | | +| | 88:6-11 | | | +| 107:11-112:1 | | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to | +|---------------|---------------------|-----------------|-------------| +| 112:7-10 | | | | +| 112:12-114:10 | | | | +| 115:6-118:20 | | | | +| 118:23-120:22 | | | | +| | 121:4-23 | | | +| 122:24-123:24 | | | | +| 125:2-5 | | | | +| 125:14-19 | | | | +| 126:1-127:8 | | 126:13-127:8 | | +| 128:7-11 | | | | +| 128:16-129:7 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| | 137:1-7 | | | +| | 137:12-16 | | | +| | 138:1-14 | | | +| | 138:21-139:4 | | | +| | 141:7-9 | | | +| | 141:11-13 | | | +| | 141:15-16 | | | +| | 141:23-142:3 | | | +| | 146:4-16 | | | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | | 156:1-160:2 (R) | | +| 158:4-160:2 | 158:1-3 | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | | 162:21-163:7 (R) | | +| 164:21-166:1 | | 164:21-166:1 (R) | | +| 166:22-167:5 | | 166:22-167:5 (R) | | +| 174:24-175:16 | | 174:24-175:16(R) | | +| 175:22-176:4 | | 175:22-176:4 (R) | | +| 180:5-20 | | 180:5-20 (R) | | +| 182:5-25 | | 182:5-25 (R) | | +| 183:16-184:3 | | 183:16-20 | | +| 185:2-186:17 | | 185:2-186:17(R) | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | | 197:14-198:6(R) | | +| 198:2-6 | | | | +| | 203:19-204:3 | | | +| | 206:20-207:3 | | | +| | 207:8-15 | | | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | | 228:15-229:25(R) | | +| 229:19-24 | | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | +| 233:13-234:6 | | | | + +o)'s + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | | 252:1-6 (R) | | +| | 261:1-7 | | | +| | 263:7-264:7 | | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | +| | 280:6-281:13 | | | +| | 282:6-9 | | | +| 283:5-284:2 | | 283:10-17 (R) | | +| | | 283:18-19 (R) | | +| | | 283:20-284:2(R) | | +| 286:12-287:6 | | 286:12-287:6(R) | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +2. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] : May 15, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 5:13-14 | | | | +| 5:23-6:2 | | | | +| 6:11-19 | | | | +| | 6:20-24 | | | +| 7:3-20 | | | | +| 7:25-8:7 | | 7:16-20 Repetitious | | +| 9:3-7 | | 9:3-7 Repetitious | | +| 11:8-10 | | | | +| | 11:11-20 | | | +| 11:21-12:3 | | | | +| 12:10-13 | | | | +| | 14:24-15:3 | | | +| | 15:17-16:3 | | | +| 16:4-15 | | | | +| 17:16-18:16 | | | | +| 18:20-19:4 | | | | +| 22:24-23:5 | | | | +| 23:25-24:15 | | | | +| 24:19-25:4 | | | | +| 25:9-12 | | | | +| 25:19-29:1 | | | | +| 29:11-22 | | 29:19-30:7 | | + +| | | Compound/NoAns. | | +|-------------|--|------------------|--| +| 30:2 | | | | +| 30:6 | | | | +| 30:25-31:20 | | 31:16-20 Hearsay | | +| 36:9-37:18 | | | | +| 38:13-22 | | | | +| 41:3-16 | | | | +| 42:5-22 | | | | +| 43:12-17 | | | | +| 44:1-13 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 45:6-17 | | | | +| 46:9-47:2 | | | | +| 47:14-23 | | | | +| | 47:24-48:3 | | | +| 48:4-23 | | | | +| 49:7-19 | | | | +| 55:10-57:8 | | 57:5-6 (R), Hearsay | | +| 57:15-58:5 | | | | +| | 58:6-59:5 | | | +| 60:20-61:16 | | 60:24-61:1 Rule 403 | | +| 62:6-10 | | | | +| 70:24-71:20 | | | | +| 72:11-25 | | 72:20-25 R, A-C | | +| | 74:18-25 | | | +| | 75:8-13 | | | +| 75:14-76:8 | | | | +| | 76:11-21 | | | +| | 76:25-78:9 | | | +| | 79:4-8 | | | +| | 79:13-15 | | | + +**3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------| +| | 113:7-25 | | | +| | 117:9-21 | | | +| | 125:9-11 | | | +| 130:12-25 | | 130:12-25 Colloquy
of Counsel, R, C | | +| 132:25-133:10 | 133:11-13 | | | +| | 134:5-7 | | | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| | 138:12-139:1 | | | +| 139:6-22 | | 139:6-22 R, LP | | +| | 140:24-141:12 | | | +| | 141:23-142:25 | | | +| 143:1-144:9 | | 143:1-20 R, LP | | +| | 144:19-145:16 | | | +| 152:11-153:14 | | 152:11-153:14 R, LP | | +| 205:9-22 | | 205:9-22 R, LP | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | +| | 207:9-208:1 | | | +| | 208:7-209:13 | | | + +| | 215:18-24 | | +|--|------------------|--| +| | 216:11-14 | | + +## 4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010 + +| Completeness/Counter | Response to | +|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------| +| /Cross Designation Designation 5:23-6:1 8:4-7 | Objections Objections | +| 13:9-14:8 19:7-11 19:17-20:1 | 13:9-14:8 LP, VS,H | +| 20:12-13 | 'S | +| 23:4-6 | 23:4-23-25 H 0 | +| 23:8 | 23:4-23-25 R, | +| 23:10-19 | 23:4-23-25 | +| 23:24-25 | 23:4- A.. ,R,LP | +| 25:6-26:15 | 25- 2. | +| | nd Hand | +| | o ge, VS,LP | +| 28:14-17 | 4-29:14 R, H, P, VS | +| ,... 'jS ) | | +| v Ave \ | | + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| Designation | /Cross Designation Objections | | +| 28:19-29:14 | 28:19-29:14 R, H, LP, VS | | +| 29:22-31:7 | 29:22-30:18 H,LP, VS 31:1-32:11 R,H,LP VS, SHK, BE | | +| 31:15-18 | R,H,LP,VS,SHK, BE | | +| | d | lik' | +| 31:20-32:1 | R,H,LP, VS, SHK BE | | +| 32:25-33:12 32:3-11 | 32:25-33:12 GC R,H,LP,VS, SHICON BE BE,LP | | +| 33:14-21 | ft | | +| 34:3-35:3 36:10-37:3 | 3\$Z4,)4.. , SHK | | +| 37:8-39:2 39:5-20 | .8-38:25 LP,H | | +| 43:2-3 43:25-443 46:16-20 46:22 | ( S r | | +| 47:3-6 47:8-11 | Ci<)4Ste | | +| 47:18-21 48:4-8 | Iczse | | +| 48:13-VS | 48:1349:1R,H,LP SHK | | +| 48:18 | R,H,LP, SHK 49:13-50:4 R,H,LP SHK | | +| 4 :24-51:4 | 50:5-51:4 R,H,LP SHK | | +| 51:15-17 | 51:15-52:17 H,LP, A-C, PA, SHK | | +| 51:20-52:17 | H,LP,A-C,PA,SHK | | +| 53:8-11 | 53:8-24 H,SHIC, LP,A-C, PA | | +| 53:13-24 54:11-55:1 55:5-22 | 11,SHK,LP,A-C,PA | | + +| 57:2-10 | | | +|------------|--|--| +| 57:15-25 | | | +| 59:11-60:5 | | | +| 60:18-20 | | | +| 60:22-24 | | | + +# 5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25. 2012 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 17:2-5 | | | | +| 17:12-14 | | | | +| 17:16-25 | | | | +| 19:16-20:8 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +((CO + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 20:23-21:5 | | | | + +**6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 17th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943)** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------| +| 58:8-17 | | 58:8-62:6 H,R,LP | | +| 58:21-60:18 | | | | +| | | | | +| 60:20-62:20 | | 61:15-61:25 H,R,LP
C | | +| | | 62:1-61:6 R,H,O | | + +**7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 4:2-5 | | | | +| 5:11-16 | | | | +| 5:23-6:22 | | | | +| 6:25-9:9 | | | | +| 9:12-10:19 | | | | +| 16:3-17:17 | | | | +| 18:19-19:3 | | | | +| 19:24-21:4 | | | | +| 21:17-22:9 | | | | +| 22:22-25:6 | | | | +| 25:8-27:23 | | | | +| 28:12-31:16 | | | | +| 32:8-33:12 | | | | +| 33:25-34:5 | | | | +| 34:7-19 | | | | +| 35:3-12 | | | | +| 35:21-43:4 | | | | +| 43:15-44:5 | | | | +| 45:2-7 | | | | +| 46:5-19 | | | | +| 47:17-49:6 | | | | +| 51:4-53:22 | | | | +| 54:2-55:7 | | | | +| 55:12-57:2 | | | | +| 59:13-62:19 | | | | + +![A blank white page with a large, light gray stain or marking across the center and bottom right corner.]() + +| | Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| | 68:24-69:8 | | | | +| | 69:21-22 | | | | +| | 69:24 | | | | +| | 70:17-71:22 | | | | +| | 76:8-77:20 | | | | +| | 79:10-24 | | | | +| | 80:12-23 | | | | +| | 83:2-16 | | | | +| | 85:18-23 | | | | +| | 86:4-89:10 | | | | +| | 92:4-93:14 | | | | +| | 94:3-15 | | | | +| | 95:1-20 | | | | +| | 98:21-99:22 | | | | +| | 104:4-12 | | | | +| | 105:7-107:11 | | | | +| | 110:12-19 | | | | +| | 110:21-111:12 | | | | +| | 112:3-12 | | | | +| | 115:10-116:19 | | | | +| | 117:14-118:2 | | | | +| | 118:14-120:4 | | | | + +8. S. Adler; April + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:14-5:12 | | | | +| 11:11-23 | | | | +| 12:16-14:14 | | | | +| 14:20-18:6 | | | | +| 18:20-20:1 | | | | +| 23:4-25:7 | | | | +| 25:21-27:10 | | | | +| 27:14-21 | | | | +| 30:10-32:17 | | | | +| 32:24-33:4 | | | | +| 35:9-17 | | | | +| 38:18-41:18 | | | | +| 42:13-43:22 | | | | +| 44:1-47:8 | | | | +| 53:15-56:21 | | | | +| 57:5-58:14 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 63:10-25 | | | | +| 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| 77:21-78:4 | | | | +| 78:6-17 | | | | +| 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| 96:1-8 | | | | +| 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| 101:19-102:7 | | | | +| 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| 106:4-23 | | | | +| 106:25-107:4 | | | | +| 107:15-23 | | | | +| 108:1-5 | | | | +| 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| 124:20-126:14 | | | | + +9. ██████████ Adler; October 28, 2010 (*In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S.D.C.* +Case No. 10-2612-BKC-RBR) + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:1-5:10 | | | | +| 9:5-12:14 | | | | +| 16:22-20:12 | | | | +| 22:9-24:22 | | | | +| 25:3-26:20 | | | | +| 39:9-51:5 | | | | +| 51:10-13 | | | | +| 51:20-52:8 | | | | +| 52:11-14 | | | | +| 52:19-63:15 | | | | +| 70:21-75:6 | | | | +| 75:9-78:7 | | | | +| 80:14-81:25 | | | | +| 83:22-88:24 | | | | +| 100:18-105:22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 105:25-106:3 | | | | +| 107:1-108:18 | | | | +| 111:6-121:18 | | | | +| 124:7-18 | | | | +| 124:23-127:19 | | | | +| 129:4-12 | | | | +| 131:5-134:25 | | | | +| 144:4-152:20 | | | | +| 154:4-155:17 | | | | +| 158:19-159:18 | | | | +| 161:22-164:14 | | | | +| 167:13-168:7 | | | | +| 169:6-170:2 | | | | +| 174:21-175:17 | | | | +| 179:23-188:14 | | | | +| 198:4-199:7 | | | | + +**10.** ██████████ **Kretschmar; February 11,** + +2011 Entire transcript + +**11. Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:10-11 | | | | +| 9:21-22 | | | | +| 11:2-9 | | | | +| 11:22-12:17 | | | | +| 13:7-14:1 | | | | +| 14:22-15:5 | | | | +| 15:16-19:2 | | | | +| 19:21-24:15 | | | | +| 25:6-26:7 | | | | +| 27:11-28:25 | | | | +| 29:7-20 | | | | +| 30:10-31:9 | | | | +| 45:22-46:4 | | | | +| 46:24-47:10 | | | | +| 47:14-51:1 | | | | +| 51:4 | | | | +| 51:6-17 | | | | +| 52:1-53:22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 53:24-54:6 | | | | +| 65:18-66:2 | | | | +| 67:16-23 | | | | + +12. Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala; May 25, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-21 | | | | +| 7:13-19 | | | | +| 7:25-8:10 | | | | +| 8:20-9:5 | | | | +| 10:9-18 | | | | +| 10:22-11:6 | | | | +| 28:5-14 | | | | +| 28:17-20 | | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | | +| 30:5-25 | | | | +| 45:13-22 | | | | +| 47:13-22 | | | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | | | +| 88:22-89:1 | | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | | +| 90:8-23 | | | | +| 91:7-11 | | | | +| 91:14-92:16 | | | | +| 93:17-18 | | | | +| 93:21-94:6 | | | | +| 95:1-17 | | | | +| 99:25-100:11 | | | | +| 101:5-11 | | | | +| 103:10-14 | | | | +| 107:7-108:3 | | | | +| 108:21-23 | | | | +| 116:19-117:10 | | | | +| 117:13 | | | | +| 117:15-118:12 | | | | +| 119:10-15 | | | | +| 123:10-18 | | | | +| 127:6-9 | | | | +| 127:12-128:12 | | | | +| 128:24-129:4 | | | | +| 130:12-18 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 130:25-131:13 | | | | +| 132:13-25 | | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | | | | +| 136:6-12 | | | | +| 141:7-19 | | | | +| 141:21-23 | | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | | | | +| 152:4-10 | | | | +| 152:18-20 | | | | +| 152:22-153:5 | | | | +| 154:4-14 | | | | +| 155:12-25 | | | | +| 156:7-21 | | | | +| 158:17-159:24 | | | | +| 160:3-8 | | | | +| 160:13-161:5 | | | | +| 161:10-11 | | | | +| 176:8-22 | | | | +| 179:5-11 | | | | +| 180:22-182:2 | | | | +| 184:2-11 | | | | +| 184:19-185:11 | | | | +| 185:16-22 | | | | +| 186:5-187:14 | | | | +| 187:16-189:15 | | | | +| 191:6-192:13 | | | | +| 195:7-196:11 | | | | +| 199:24-200:3 | | | | +| 200:5-12 | | | | +| 200:19-21 | | | | +| 200:23-201:16 | | | | +| 203:16-21 | | | | +| 204:3-7 | | | | +| 205:8-10 | | | | +| 205:12-206:2 | | | | +| 206:4-11 | | | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | | +| 208:7-13 | | | | +| 208:16-18 | | | | +| 212-9-213:22 | | | | +| 214:24-25 | | | | +| 215:6-9 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 246:7-247:22 | | | | +| 248:7-249:7 | | | | +| 252:10-253:10 | | | | +| 254:6-12 | | | | +| 254:19-256:4 | | | | +| 258:16-259:25 | | | | +| 260:7-12 | | | | +| 260:24-261:13 | | | | +| 275:14-276:20 | | | | +| 277:2-6 | | | | +| 277:16-21 | | | | +| 281:19-283:3 | | | | +| 283:10-284:9 | | | | +| 284:15-25 | | | | +| 285:21-23 | | | | +| 286:4-10 | | | | +| 286:14-18 | | | | +| 286:20-21 | | | | +| 290:4-13 | | | | +| 356:2-18 | | | | +| 356:23-357:7 | | | | +| 357:16-358:11 | | | | +| 358:15-16 | | | | +| 365:20-366:6 | | | | +| 366:8-22 | | | | + +13. [REDACTED] : October 12, 2017 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-11:22 | | | | +| 14:10-18 | | | | +| 14:21-15:12 | | | | +| 15:15-16:2 | | | | +| 16:7-10 | | | | +| 16:14-18 | | | | +| 17:18-19:16 | | | | +| 20:22-25:17 | | | | +| 26:24-28:8 | | | | +| 28:11-29:4 | | | | +| 34:2-16 | | | | +| 34:18-35:6 | | | | +| 45:3-47:19 | | | | + +| | Completeness/Counter | | Response to Objections | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------|------------------------| +| Designation 47:2349:21 51:13-21 53:14-54:15 54:17-56:8 56:21-57:3 57:9-13 57:15-58:9 86:8-22 91:14-92:10 108:21-109:2 116:16-22 1177-118:7 | /Cross Designation | Objections | | +| 120:6-23 121:6-122:23 | | C | .00 | +| 123:8-124:23 | | ‘Th | | + +J. expressly res the ght to amend or supplement these objections to designations, including any addition a tions taken in this or other related matters. + ++6s + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm + +Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +## COUNSEL LIST + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763118/EFTA02763118.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763118/EFTA02763118.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37b1f3a19d3a6cd5a030961c606e06cef33bf07c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763118/EFTA02763118.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,913 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763118.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 23, + "chars": 66437, + "elapsed_seconds": 218.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PRELIMINARY OBJE 0 D COUNTER \nDESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/COUNT \nEPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI \nFENDANT JEFFREY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 519.087158203125, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 519.087158203125, + 328.10302734375 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 328.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 434.97 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 434.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 275.9562072753906, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 275.9562072753906, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 134.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25. 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 283.08966064453125, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 283.08966064453125, + 179.01 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 179.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 17th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 528.768, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 528.768, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 177.39000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 345.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "10. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 Kretschmar; February 11,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 380.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "11. Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 291.924, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 291.924, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 426.87000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12. Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala; May 25, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 304.164, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 304.164, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 189.54000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 65.61 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 65.61 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 79.38 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763118" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5aa45cabdaefeb07c017641c1b4d32499ffc6a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE TO PRODUCE AT TRIAL + +██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice to Produce at Trial requesting that Jeffrey Epstein produce the following at trial: + +**The eyeglasses marked as an Exhibit 1 to the Videotaped Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken in this matter on March 17, 2010 referenced in the transcript at 133:4-133:8.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of December, 2017. + +![]() + +--- + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice to Produce at Trial +Page 2 of 3 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice to Produce at Trial +Page 3 of 3 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..540ebdc032ab9c957494bc5a4fb7ea77a2e8448f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141/EFTA02763141.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763141.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2707, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.14, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE TO PRODUCE AT TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 317.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763141" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c6fc9c1c9647149c27a3755234bbd1d833100d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.md @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO34BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +## NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE AID LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TAKEN MARCH 17, 2010 + +Counter-Plaintiff; J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits his Page and Line Designatiotl t6e Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 as follows: + +- 1) 4:7-4:11 +- 2) 4:22-5:2 +- 3) 5:23-S, +- 4) 10:6-10:19 +- 5) 14:9-14:19 +- 6) 15:15-15:24 +- 7) 16:9-16:16 +- 8) 17:11-17:16 +- 9) 17:17-18:4 + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Supplemental Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 + +Page 2 of 6 + +10) 18:6-18:16 + +11) 18:17-19-5 + +12) 22:11-23:2 + +13) 34:17-37:17 + +14) 38:23-43:1 + +15) 44:3-47:14 + +16) 63:23-64:3 + +17) 66:8-66:24 + +18) 67:3-67:11 + +19) 67:22-68:12 + +20) 70:14-71:2 + +21) 83:24-84:3 + +22) 84:12-84:15 + +23) 85:11-85:14 + +24) 86:2-86:4 + +25) 87:147:4 + +26) 87:13-87:15 + +27) 87:17-87:24 + +28) 88:4-88:18 + +29) 88:19-90:7 + +30) 90:18-91:21 + +Go + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Supplemental Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 + +Page 3 of 6 + +31) 92:2-92:4 + +32) 93:6-93:7 + +33)93:12-93:15 + +34) 94:6-94:9 + +35) 95:8-96:3 + +36) 97:23-98:9 + +37) 101:19-104:25 + +38) 106:7-108:9 + +39) 108:15-108:25 + +40) 109:5-109:6 + +41) 109:8-109:16 + +42) 110:4-110:5 + +43) 110:9-110:25 + +44)111:3-111:4 1 P\* + +45) 111:8-111:20 + +46)111:23-111:24 + +47) 112:3-112:19 + +48) 112:22-113:25 + +49) 114:9-114:13 + +50) 115:21-116:10 + +51) 116:12-117:1 + +IM adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Supplemental Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 + +Page 4 of 6 + +52) 117:6-117:9 + +53) 117:12 + +54) 117:14-117:20 + +55) 118:8-118:9 + +56) 118:15-118:17 + +57) 118:22-118:25 + +58) 119:5-119:6 + +59) 119:11-119:15 + +60) 119:20-120:11 + +61) 120:12-120:25 + +62) 121:2 + +63) 122:1-122:3 + +64) 122:5 + +65) 122:7-122:8 tt7 Ilir + +66) 126:9-126:18 + +67) 126:20 + +A Coes + +[REDACTED] & adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Supplemental Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 +Page 5 of 6 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Supplemental Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 +Page 6 of 6 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94c9ca9ab88ae890542b979fc56f3d9a5d779527 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144/EFTA02763144.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,286 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763144.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 4564, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 116.853515625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 116.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE AID LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR \nDEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TAKEN MARCH 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 521.4334716796875, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 521.4334716796875, + 374.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 374.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 159.57000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763144" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da32c2c58e0745000629235bf81ccdba90c00467 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +cos + +## SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO MO 01\* IiV LIMINE ADDRESSING SCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Second Supplement to his November 13, 2017 Motion in Limine to address the scope of admissible evidence in the trial of the pending malicious prosecution claim, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +- 1. On November 16, 2017, Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed his Deposition Designations for use at trial. +- 2. Included in that submission were designations to testimony regarding misconduct that occurred within the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler law firm ("RRA") during the six (6) months in which Bradley was an employee of the firm.' Coupled with certain arguments that have been raised by Epstein's counsel in their papers and at recent pre-trial hearings, it appears that Epstein mistakenly believes that this evidence, which Epstein was unaware of at the time he + +had no involvement whatsoever in the improprieties being committed by Scott Rothstein and had absolutely no knowledge of any illicit activities until learning about them through media reporting after RRA'a implosion. + +adv. Epstein Motion in Limine Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG + +filed his rushed and malicious lawsuit on December 7, 2009, somehow provides support to establish that Epstein had the requisite probable cause before initiating his lawsuit against . Clearly, however, Epstein cannot establish that he had probable cause to sue by relying upon evidence that he did not know about at the time httLfd suit. All testimony and evidence regarding the internal activities at RRA learned e AP nt to December su.--bs- -- Ili I, 7, 2009 and offered to support the existence of probable cause are irrelevant toisEues in the pending proceeding and should be excluded from evidence on that basis + +I 3. Epstein also designated portions of transcrjp ing testimony of "litigation misconduct" that actions taken by by the absolute litigation privilege and probable cause to support a se int against . See, e.g., Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, 606, 608 (Fla. 1994). T Epstein should be precluded from offering any such evidence in support of his purpoited prnbable cause to file this rushed and malicious lawsuit against allegedly committed whi Ais h mployed by RRA. Obviously, any 'Sic on behalf of his titre • n 'thin their individual cases are protected as a matter of law, have formed the basis of Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff, J. , respectfully requests that the Court enter -Ora( granting this Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence in Connection with Counter-Defendant's Deposition Designations, as well as rewarding and such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Motion in Limine +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +David P. Vitale Jr. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Motion in Limine +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e4481144e5a61c934133783aafd84944a559031 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150/EFTA02763150.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763150.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4951, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.5093994140625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.5093994140625, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO MO 01* IiV LIMINE ADDRESSING \nSCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 325.6140441894531 + ], + [ + 517.335693359375, + 325.6140441894531 + ], + [ + 517.335693359375, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763150" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50fb73b7f48b9166806a7d9405559f3f742e097c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.md @@ -0,0 +1,918 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJE N9l4ND COUNTER DESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/COUNT EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI FENDANT JEFFREY + +Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, J. files his Objections and + +Counter Designations to the following depositio on designated by Jeffrey Epstein for use in the instant case and/or as rebuttal: + +A-CPA ATTORNEY-CL ILEGE ASSERTION + +BE BEST EVID + +SHK SECOND OWLEDGE + +VS OLA STIPULATION + +LP / ..."'L ATION PRIVILEGE + +•IEARSAY + +OPINION + +R RELEVANCE + +REPETITIOUS + +COMPOUND/NO ANSWER + +S SPECULATION + +1. .1. March 23.2010 + +| | Response to Objections | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Counter Desig. (BE) Designation 5:18-21 6:23-24 7:2-5 | Objections (BE) | +| 7:17-8:23 9:7-9 9:13-16, 18-24 10:13-25 11:4-7 11:22-25 12:2-3 12:7-12 12:16-23 13:13-20 | 7:17-8:23 (R) 9:7-9 (R) 9:10-9:24 (R) 10:13-25(R) 11:4-7 (R) 11:22-25(R) 12:2-3 (R) | +| 14:8-19 15:5-18:2 20:16-23 | 4 c -23 (R) | +| 21:1-23:2 o's | \ :1-32 (R) | + +o's + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 23:21-24:17 | | 23:21-24:17(R) | | +| 25:16-24 | | | | +| 26:8-27:3 | | | | +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | | 31:10-15 (R) | | +| 31:20-23 | | 31:20-23 (R) | | +| 36:6-16 | | 36:6-16 (R) | | +| 38:18-24 | | 38:18-24 (R) | | +| 43:4-10 | | 43:4-10 (R) | | +| 45:13-25 | | 45:13-25 (R) | | +| | 49:10-15 | | | +| | 49:17-22 | | | +| | 50:1-4 | | | +| | 51:22-52:14 | | | +| 53:4-54:4 | | 53:4-54:4 (R) | | +| 54:9-10 | | 54:9-10 (R) | | +| 54:14-22 | | 54:14-22 (R) | | +| 55:10-21 | | 55:10-21 (R) | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | | 57:7-25 (R) | | +| 58:11-15 | | 58:11-15 (R) | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | | 63:25-64:15(R) | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| | 79:7-79:23 | | | +| | 80:9-16 | | | +| | 80:23-24 | | | +| | 81-16-20 | | | +| | 82:17-83:3 | | | +| | 83:8-22 | | | +| | 88:6-11 | | | +| 107:11-112:1 | | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to | +|---------------|---------------------|-----------------|-------------| +| 112:7-10 | | | | +| 112:12-114:10 | | | | +| 115:6-118:20 | | | | +| 118:23-120:22 | | | | +| | 121:4-23 | | | +| 122:24-123:24 | | | | +| 125:2-5 | | | | +| 125:14-19 | | | | +| 126:1-127:8 | | 126:13-127:8 | | +| 128:7-11 | | | | +| 128:16-129:7 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| | 137:1-7 | | | +| | 137:12-16 | | | +| | 138:1-14 | | | +| | 138:21-139:4 | | | +| | 141:7-9 | | | +| | 141:11-13 | | | +| | 141:15-16 | | | +| | 141:23-142:3 | | | +| | 146:4-16 | | | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | | 156:1-160:2 (R) | | +| 158:4-160:2 | 158:1-3 | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | | 162:21-163:7 (R) | | +| 164:21-166:1 | | 164:21-166:1 (R) | | +| 166:22-167:5 | | 166:22-167:5 (R) | | +| 174:24-175:16 | | 174:24-175:16(R) | | +| 175:22-176:4 | | 175:22-176:4 (R) | | +| 180:5-20 | | 180:5-20 (R) | | +| 182:5-25 | | 182:5-25 (R) | | +| 183:16-184:3 | | 183:16-20 | | +| 185:2-186:17 | | 185:2-186:17(R) | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | | 197:14-198:6(R) | | +| 198:2-6 | | | | +| | 203:19-204:3 | | | +| | 206:20-207:3 | | | +| | 207:8-15 | | | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | | 228:15-229:25(R) | | +| 229:19-24 | | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | +| 233:13-234:6 | | | | + +| 234:16-23 | 234:16-23(R) | | +|---------------|--------------|--| +| 235:8-13 | 235:17-21(R) | | +| 235:15 | | | +| 235:17-21 | | | +| 236:8-15 | 236:8-15 (R) | | +| 238:24-239:2 | | | +| 239:18-243:21 | | | +| 245:4-245:22 | | | +| 246:12-247:11 | | | +| 247:18-23 | | | +| 248:22-249:7 | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | + +o)'s + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | | 252:1-6 (R) | | +| | 261:1-7 | | | +| | 263:7-264:7 | | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | +| | 280:6-281:13 | | | +| | 282:6-9 | | | +| 283:5-284:2 | | 283:10-17 (R) | | +| | | 283:18-19 (R) | | +| | | 283:20-284:2(R) | | +| 286:12-287:6 | | 286:12-287:6(R) | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +2. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] : May 15, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 5:13-14 | | | | +| 5:23-6:2 | | | | +| 6:11-19 | | | | +| | 6:20-24 | | | +| 7:3-20 | | | | +| 7:25-8:7 | | 7:16-20 Repetitious | | +| 9:3-7 | | 9:3-7 Repetitious | | +| 11:8-10 | | | | +| | 11:11-20 | | | +| 11:21-12:3 | | | | +| 12:10-13 | | | | +| | 14:24-15:3 | | | +| | 15:17-16:3 | | | +| 16:4-15 | | | | +| 17:16-18:16 | | | | +| 18:20-19:4 | | | | +| 22:24-23:5 | | | | +| 23:25-24:15 | | | | +| 24:19-25:4 | | | | +| 25:9-12 | | | | +| 25:19-29:1 | | | | +| 29:11-22 | | 29:19-30:7 | | + +| | | Compound/NoAns. | | +|-------------|--|------------------|--| +| 30:2 | | | | +| 30:6 | | | | +| 30:25-31:20 | | 31:16-20 Hearsay | | +| 36:9-37:18 | | | | +| 38:13-22 | | | | +| 41:3-16 | | | | +| 42:5-22 | | | | +| 43:12-17 | | | | +| 44:1-13 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------| +| 45:6-17 | | | | +| 46:9-47:2 | | | | +| 47:14-23 | | | | +| | 47:24-48:3 | | | +| 48:4-23 | | | | +| 49:7-19 | | | | +| 55:10-57:8 | | 57:5-6 (R), Hearsay | | +| 57:15-58:5 | | | | +| | 58:6-59:5 | | | +| 60:20-61:16 | | 60:24-61:1 Rule 403 | | +| 62:6-10 | | | | +| 70:24-71:20 | | | | +| 72:11-25 | | 72:20-25 R, A-C | | +| | 74:18-25 | | | +| | 75:8-13 | | | +| 75:14-76:8 | | | | +| | 76:11-21 | | | +| | 76:25-78:9 | | | +| | 79:4-8 | | | +| | 79:13-15 | | | + +**3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------| +| | 113:7-25 | | | +| | 117:9-21 | | | +| | 125:9-11 | | | +| 130:12-25 | | 130:12-25 Colloquy
of Counsel, R, C | | +| 132:25-133:10 | 133:11-13 | | | +| | 134:5-7 | | | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| | 138:12-139:1 | | | +| 139:6-22 | | 139:6-22 R, LP | | +| | 140:24-141:12 | | | +| | 141:23-142:25 | | | +| 143:1-144:9 | | 143:1-20 R, LP | | +| | 144:19-145:16 | | | +| 152:11-153:14 | | 152:11-153:14 R, LP | | +| 205:9-22 | | 205:9-22 R, LP | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | +| | 207:9-208:1 | | | +| | 208:7-209:13 | | | + +| | 215:18-24 | | +|--|------------------|--| +| | 216:11-14 | | + +# 4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 5:23-6:1 | | | | +| 8:4-7 | | | | +| 13:9-14:8 | | 13:9-14:8 LP, VS,H | | +| 19:7-11 | | | | +| 19:17-20:1 | | | | +| 20:12-13 | | | | +| 23:4-6 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:8 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:10-19 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:24-25 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 25:6-26:15 | | 25:6-26:15 | | +| | | Hearsay, 2 nd Hand Knowledge, VS,LP | | +| 28:14-17 | | 28:14-29:14 R, H, LP, VS | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------| +| 28:19-29:14 | | 28:19-29:14 | | +| | | R, H, LP, VS | | +| 29:22-31:7 | | 29:22-30:18 H,LP,
VS | | +| | | 31:1-32:11 R,H,LP | | +| | | VS, SHK, BE | | +| 31:15-18 | | R,H,LP,VS,SHK,
BE | | +| 31:20-32:1 | | R,H,LP, VS, SHK
BE | | +| 32:3-11 | | R,H,LP,VS, SHK,
BE | | +| 32:25-33:12 | | 32:25-33:12 H,SHK
BE,LP | | +| 33:14-21 | | | | +| 34:3-35:3 | | 34:3-34:25 H, SHK
LP | | +| 36:10-37:3 | | | | +| 37:8-39:2 | | 37:18-38:25 LP,H | | +| 39:5-20 | | | | +| 43:2-3 | | | | +| 43:25-44:3 | | | | +| 46:16-20 | | | | +| 46:22 | | | | +| 47:3-6 | | | | +| 47:8-11 | | | | +| 47:18-21 | | | | +| 48:4-8 | | | | +| 48:13-16 | | 48:13-49:1R,H,LP
SHK | | +| 48:19-49:1 | | R,H,LP, SHK | | +| 49:13-21 | | 49:13-50:4 R,H,LP
SHK | | +| 49:24-51:4 | | 50:5-51:4 R,H,LP
SHK | | +| 51:15-17 | | 51:15-52:17 H,LP,
A-C, PA, SHK | | +| 51:20-52:17 | | H,LP,A-C,PA,SHK | | +| 53:8-11 | | 53:8-24 H,SHK,
LP,A-C, PA | | +| 53:13-24 | | H,SHK,LP,A-C,PA | | +| 54:11-55:1 | | | | +| 55:5-22 | | | | + +| 57:2-10 | | | | +|------------|--|--|--| +| 57:15-25 | | | | +| 59:11-60:5 | | | | +| 60:18-20 | | | | +| 60:22-24 | | | | + +5. **Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 17:2-5 | | | | +| 17:12-14 | | | | +| 17:16-25 | | | | +| 19:16-20:8 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 20:23–21:5 | | | | + +## 6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 1T° Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943) + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------| +| 58:8-17 | | 58:8-62:6 H,R,LP | | +| 58:21-60:18 | | | | +| | | | | +| 60:20-62:20 | | 61:15-61:25 H,R,LP | | +| | | C | | +| | | 62:1-61:6 R,H, O | | + +# 7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------|------------------------| +| 4:2-5 | | | | +| 5:11-16 | | | | +| 5:23-6:22 | | 6:14-8:6 (R) | | +| 6:25-9:9 | | 6:14-8:6 (R) | | +| | 8:22-9:5 | | | +| | 9:20 | | | +| | 9:24-9:25 | | | +| 9:12-10:19 | | | | +| 16:3-17:17 | | | | +| 18:19-19:3 | 18:19-18:21 | | | +| | 18:24 | | | +| | 19:1-19:9 | | | +| 19:24-21:4 | 19:24-20:15 | | | +| 21:17-22:9 | 21:17-21:25 | | | +| | 22:4-22:9 | | | +| 22:22-25:6 | 23:2-23:16 | | | +| | 23:24-24:1 | | | +| | 24:4-24:9 | | | +| 25:8-27:23 | 25:20-25:23 | | | +| | 26:2-26:6 | 26:7-27:23 R,LP | | +| 28:12-31:16 | | 28:12-31:16 R, LP | | +| 32:8-33:12 | | 32:8-33:12 R, LP | | +| 33:25-34:5 | | 33:25-34:19 R,LP | | +| 34:7-19 | | | | +| 35:3-12 | | 35:3-12 R, LP | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------|------------------------| +| 68:24-69:8 | | 68:24-69:8 R | | +| 69:21-22 | | 69:21-22 R | | +| 69:24 | | 69:24 R | | +| 70:17-71:22 | | 70:17-70:20 R | | +| | | 71:5-71:22 R, LP | | +| 76:8-77:20 | | 76:8-77:20 R, LP | | +| 79:10-24 | | 79:10-24 R, LP | | +| 80:12-23 | | 80:12-23 O,S,R,LP | | +| 83:2-16 | | 83:2-16 R, LP | | +| 85:18-23 | | 85:18-23 R | | +| 86:4-89:10 | | 86:4-89:10 R, LP | | +| 92:4-93:14 | | | | +| 94:3-15 | | 94:3-94:15 R | | +| 95:1-20 | | 95:1-95:4 R | | +| 98:21-99:22 | | 98:21-99:22 R | | +| 104:4-12 | | 104:4-104:12 R | | +| 105:7-107:11 | 107:9-11 | 105:7-105:25 R | | +| | 109:15-19 | | | +| 110:12-19 | | | | +| 110:21-111:12 | | 110:21-111:12 R | | +| 112:3-12 | | 112:3-12 | | +| | 114:9-15 | | | +| 115:10-116:19 | | 115:10-116:19R LP | | +| | 116:9-10 | | | +| | 116:12-13 | | | +| | 116:24-25 | | | +| | 117:1-2 | | | +| | 117:5-6 | | | +| | 117:12-13 | | | +| 117:14-118:2 | 117:25-118:2 | 117:14-118:2RLPH | | +| 118:14-120:4 | | 118:14-120:4 R LP | | +| | 121:4-122:15 | | | +| | 122:23-124:7 | | | + +8. S. Adler April 20 2011\* + +\* J. OBJECTS TO USE OF THE ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY. ALL IRRELEVANT AS POST-FILING INFORMATION THAT CANNOT SUPPORT P.C. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS ARE SEPARATELY NOTED. + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:14-5:12 | 4:8-11 | | | +| 11:11-23 | | | | + +| 32:24-33:4 | 32:24-33:1 NoAns. | +|-------------|-------------------| +| | 33:2-4 C | +| 35:9-17 | 35:9-17 403 | +| 38:18-41:18 | | +| 42:13-43:22 | 42:13-43:22 R | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------|------------------------| +| 63:10-25 | | | | +| | 65:15-66:6 | | | +| | 66:11-20 | | | +| | 72:13-73:1 | | | +| 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| 77:21-78:4 | | | | +| 78:6-17 | | | | +| 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| 96:1-8 | | | | +| 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| 101:19-102:7 | | 101:19-102:7 | 403 | +| 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| 106:4-23 | | 106:4-107:4 | R | +| 106:25-107:4 | | | | +| 107:15-23 | | 107:15-23 | R | +| 108:1-5 | | 108:1-3 | R | +| | | 108:4-5 | R, 403 | +| 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| 124:20-126:14 | | | | +| | 151:22-152:22 | | | + +9. Able October 28, 2010 (In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adkr, P.A., U.S.D.C. Case 2 12-BKC-RBR) \* + +\*EDW BJECTS TO THE USE OF THIS ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY ALSO MONY GIVEN ON 10/28/10 IS IRRELEVANT TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR SUIT FIL ON 12/7/09. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS NOTED. + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|-----------------------|----------------------|---------------------------| +| Designation | /Cross Designation | Objections | +| 4:1-5:10 | | 4:23-5:12 R | +| 9:5-12:14 | | 9:5-12:14 R | +| 16:22-20:12 | | 16:22-20:12 R | +| 22:9-24:22 25:3-26:20 | | 22:9-26:20 R | +| 39:9-51:5 | | 39:9-41:10 R 43:8-55:11 R | + +| 51:10-13 | | | | +|---------------|--|----------------|--| +| 51:20-52:8 | | | | +| 52:11-14 | | | | +| 52:19-63:15 | | | | +| 70:21-75:6 | | 70:21-78:7 R | | +| 75:9-78:7 | | | | +| 80:14-81:25 | | 80:14-81:25 R | | +| 83:22-88:24 | | 83:22-86:10 R | | +| | | 88:9-88:22 R | | +| | | 88:23-24 R | | +| 100:18-105:22 | | 100:18-106:3 R | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 105:25-106:3 | | | | +| 107:1-108:18 | | 107:1-108:18 R | | +| 111:6-121:18 | | 111:6-121:18 R | | +| 124:7-18 | | 124:7-124:18 R | | +| 124:23-127:19 | | 124:23-127:19 R | | +| 129:4-12 | | | | +| 131:5-134:25 | | | | +| 144:4-152:20 | | 144:4-152:20 R | | +| 154:4-155:17 | | 154:4-155:17 R | | +| 158:19-159:18 | | 158:19-159:18 R | | +| 161:22-164:14 | | 161:22-164:14 R | | +| 167:13-168:7 | | 167:13-168:7 H | | +| | | SHK | | +| 169:6-170:2 | | 169:6-170:2 H R | | +| | | SHK | | +| 174:21-175:17 | | 174:20-175:17 H | | +| | | SHK, R | | +| 179:23-188:14 | | 179:23-188:14 R | | +| 198:4-199:7 | | 198:4-199:7 R | | + +**10.** ██████████ **Kretschmar; February 11,** +2011 Entire transcript + +**11.** Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:10-11 | | | | +| 9:21-22 | | | | +| 11:2-9 | | | | +| 11:22-12:17 | | | | +| 13:7-14:1 | | | | +| 14:22-15:5 | | | | +| 15:16-19:2 | | | | +| 19:21-24:15 | | | | +| 25:6-26:7 | | | | +| 27:11-28:25 | | | | +| 29:7-20 | | | | +| 30:10-31:9 | | | | +| 45:22-46:4 | | | | +| 46:24-47:10 | | | | +| 47:14-51:1 | | | | +| 51:4 | | | | + +| 51:6-17 | | | | +|------------|--|--|--| +| 52:1-53:22 | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 53:24-54:6 | | | | +| 65:18-66:2 | | | | +| 67:16-23 | | | | + +12. Abraxas ██████████ Discala; May 25, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-21 | | | | +| 7:13-19 | | | | +| 7:25-8:10 | | | | +| 8:20-9:5 | | | | +| 10:9-18 | | | | +| 10:22-11:6 | | | | +| 28:5-14 | | | | +| 28:17-20 | | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | | +| 30:5-25 | | | | +| 45:13-22 | | | | +| 47:13-22 | | | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | | | +| 88:22-89:1 | | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | | +| 90:8-23 | | | | +| 91:7-11 | | | | +| 91:14-92:16 | | | | +| 93:17-18 | | | | +| 93:21-94:6 | | | | +| 95:1-17 | | | | +| 99:25-100:11 | | | | +| 101:5-11 | | | | +| 103:10-14 | | | | +| 107:7-108:3 | | | | +| 108:21-23 | | | | +| 116:19-117:10 | | | | +| 117:13 | | | | +| 117:15-118:12 | | | | +| 119:10-15 | | | | +| 123:10-18 | | | | +| 127:6-9 | | | | +| 127:12-128:12 | | | | +| 128:24-129:4 | | | | +| 130:12-18 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 130:25-131:13 | | | | +| 132:13-25 | | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | | | | +| 136:6-12 | | | | +| 141:7-19 | | | | +| 141:21-23 | | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | | | | +| 152:4-10 | | | | +| 152:18-20 | | | | +| 152:22-153:5 | | | | +| 154:4-14 | | | | +| 155:12-25 | | | | +| 156:7-21 | | | | +| 158:17-159:24 | | | | +| 160:3-8 | | | | +| 160:13-161:5 | | | | +| 161:10-11 | | | | +| 176:8-22 | | | | +| 179:5-11 | | | | +| 180:22-182:2 | | | | +| 184:2-11 | | | | +| 184:19-185:11 | | | | +| 185:16-22 | | | | +| 186:5-187:14 | | | | +| 187:16-189:15 | | | | +| 191:6-192:13 | | | | +| 195:7-196:11 | | | | +| 199:24-200:3 | | | | +| 200:5-12 | | | | +| 200:19-21 | | | | +| 200:23-201:16 | | | | +| 203:16-21 | | | | +| 204:3-7 | | | | +| 205:8-10 | | | | +| 205:12-206:2 | | | | +| 206:4-11 | | | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | | +| 208:7-13 | | | | +| 208:16-18 | | | | +| 212-9-213:22 | | | | +| 214:24-25 | | | | +| 215:6-9 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 246:7-247:22 | | | | +| 248:7-249:7 | | | | +| 252:10-253:10 | | | | +| 254:6-12 | | | | +| 254:19-256:4 | | | | +| 258:16-259:25 | | | | +| 260:7-12 | | | | +| 260:24-261:13 | | | | +| 275:14-276:20 | | | | +| 277:2-6 | | | | +| 277:16-21 | | | | +| 281:19-283:3 | | | | +| 283:10-284:9 | | | | +| 284:15-25 | | | | +| 285:21-23 | | | | +| 286:4-10 | | | | +| 286:14-18 | | | | +| 286:20-21 | | | | +| 290:4-13 | | | | +| 356:2-18 | | | | +| 356:23-357:7 | | | | +| 357:16-358:11 | | | | +| 358:15-16 | | | | +| 365:20-366:6 | | | | +| 366:8-22 | | | | + +13. [REDACTED] : October 12, 2017 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-11:22 | | | | +| 14:10-18 | | | | +| 14:21-15:12 | | | | +| 15:15-16:2 | | | | +| 16:7-10 | | | | +| 16:14-18 | | | | +| 17:18-19:16 | | | | +| 20:22-25:17 | | | | +| 26:24-28:8 | | | | +| 28:11-29:4 | | | | +| 34:2-16 | | | | +| 34:18-35:6 | | | | +| 45:3-47:19 | | | | + +| | Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--|--------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| | 47:23-49:21 | | | | +| | 51:13-21 | | | | +| | 53:14-54:15 | | | | +| | 54:17-56:8 | | | | +| | 56:21-57:3 | | | | +| | 57:9-13 | | | | +| | 57:15-58:9 | | | | +| | 86:8-22 | | | | +| | 91:14-92:10 | | | | +| | 108:21-109:2 | | | | +| | 116:16-22 | | | | +| | 117:7-118:7 | | | | +| | 120:6-23 | | | | +| | 121:6-122:23 | | | | +| | 123:8-124:23 | | | | + +J. expressly r the ght to amend or supplement these objections to designations, including any additi lions taken in this or other related matters. + ++0 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 12th day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mjmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.2139 Palm + +Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +## COUNSEL LIST + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07acd01228217716abc11427719e1cf95816a104 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154/EFTA02763154.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,965 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763154.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 26, + "chars": 74514, + "elapsed_seconds": 231.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJE N9l4ND COUNTER \nDESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/COUNT \nEPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI \nFENDANT JEFFREY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 519.4879150390625, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 519.4879150390625, + 327.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 327.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 304.164, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 304.164, + 434.97 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 434.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 275.9562072753906, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 275.9562072753906, + 137.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 137.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 180.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 1T\u00b0 Judicial \nCircuit Case No. 09-062943)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 528.4423828125, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 528.4423828125, + 178.863037109375 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 178.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 264.33966064453125, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 264.33966064453125, + 346.10302734375 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 346.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12. Abraxas \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 Discala; May 25, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 174.96 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 174.96 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 190.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 77.76 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763154" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59e6b87c6e9e08883b410b1832c264c574053b73 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.md @@ -0,0 +1,614 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A Cos + +## OBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-DENTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDEDI4T IT LIST + +J. by and through his un 61,0 counsel, files his Objections to Counter- + +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Amended E ted November 16, 2017, as follows: + +# C INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objection 5. Privileged +- 1. All obja s 6. Opinion ns, except authenticity 7. Hearsay ant or immaterial 8. Authenticity lacking +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, J. Edwards and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | 0 | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | 0 | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | 0 | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | 1 | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. Edwards (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas [REDACTED] Discala (5/25/11)
f. Dean Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney [REDACTED] (10/12/17) | 2 | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | 2 | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | 1 | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | 1 | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | 1 | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|--------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | 1 | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and | | | + +## L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein 1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | 1 | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | Ci | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Su | | +| | | (1) Paul Visoski, Jr. an vt' | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Produ i to fendant | 2 | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Ans A r illative | | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's mended Complaint | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third cod plaint | 2 | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Di th Prejudice | 2 | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, d M n transcripts, exhibits and | | +| | | videotapes includi , ut not limited to: | | +| | | a. L /09; 2/9/10) | | + +| USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--|--| +| 30 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 2 | | | +| 31 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | 0 | | | +| 32 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | 2 | | | + +## L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S .D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +## E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | 0 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection Marked | +|------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | 0 | +| 39 , | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to | | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | 0 | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismi sir‘ | | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcri | e its and | +| | | a. E.W. (5/6/10) | | + +## e v. Jeffrey Epstein USD . la. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | | Court docket, all ourt r gs referenced therein and | +|----|---------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| | | all discovery an | ' ery responses | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint | E. I) 0 | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant | 's Motion to Stay and/or | +| | | Co | e Ac • n for Time Certain Based on Parallel | +| | | C' '1 | Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated | +| | | o | dum of Law (D.E. 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | N of | of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | +| 52 | 4/9/0 | | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) 0 | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | 0 | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | + +***Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)* +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119** + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | 0 | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | 0 | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | 0 | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | 0 | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | + +***Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)* +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV** + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | 0 | | | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
b. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
c. Russell Adler (10/28/10). | 1 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], William Berger and Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against James [REDACTED]; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | 0 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | 1 | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | 1 | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | 1 | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | 1 | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendell (01449) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | 1 | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | 1 | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | 1 | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05239) | 1 | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | 1 | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | 1 | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | 1 | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | 1 | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | 1 | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | 1 | | | +| 119 | 7/4/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | 1 | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05803) | 1 | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (01662) | 1 | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. Edwards re cross noticing depositions | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | 1 | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (03070) | 1 | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | 1 | | | +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | 1 | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | 1 | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | 1 | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | 1 | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | 1 | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | 1 | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (06959-06960) | 1 | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | 1 | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | 1 | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | 1 | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | 1 | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat [REDACTED] and Mike Fisten (01376) | 1 | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | 1 | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [ | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | 1 | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | 1 | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | 1 | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff
(07647) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | 1 | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07674-07675) | 1 | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | 1 | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | 1 | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | 1 | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff
(07686-07688) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | 1 | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | 1 | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | 1 | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | 1 | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | 1 | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04321) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04318-04319) | 1 | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (10586-10589) | 1 | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | 1 | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff (06789) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06788) | 1 | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita [REDACTED] (19986-19987) | 1 | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Nigel Rosser (06191) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | 1 | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | 1 | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | 1 | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | 1 | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | 1 | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | 1 | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | 1 | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | 1 | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | 1 | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | 1 | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | 1 | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | 1 | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | 1 | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | 1 | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 2 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | 0 | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | 2 | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | 2 | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 098308 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier [REDACTED] man, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/ Robert-d-critton-jr/) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] white.com/Attorneys/id/3/read) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. Edwards | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | 3, 4, 8 | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL& | 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED]
( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad- ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press- ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail. Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | 0 | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | 0 | | | +| | | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | 0 | | | +| | | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | 0 | | | +| | | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | 0 | | | +| | | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NBC News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | 0 | | | +| | | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | 0 | | | +| | | Court and arrest information; James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | 1 | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | 1 | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | 1 | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11- | 1 | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | 1 | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | 1 | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | 1 | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | 1 | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | 1 | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | 1 | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | 1 | | | + +## et Experts + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | 0 | | | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | 0 | | | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | 1 | | | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | 1 | | | +| 287 | Misc. | All public records, news articles and prior testimony of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +## Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------|------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog— Rothstein | 3, 4, 7.8 | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Cleared by the Florida Bar | | | | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | | | | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | | | | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | 0 | | | +| | | Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | | | | +| | | | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Bradley J. ██████████ and any witnesses listed by either party | 1 | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all ██████████ letters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | 1 | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | 1 | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | 1 | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | 1 | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | 1 | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | 1 | | | +| | | 330 | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | 1 | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by ██████████ J. ██████████ (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of ██████████ exhibits introduced at trial) | 1 | | | + +Plaintiffitounter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 12th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +David P. Vitale Jr. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1502da8c7f5541e350175a354e1097062eb6e14d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180/EFTA02763180.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,969 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763180.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 24, + "chars": 120206, + "elapsed_seconds": 24.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.804, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 507.5047302246094, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 507.5047302246094, + 139.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 139.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-DENTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDEDI4T IT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.968, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 493.08233642578125, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 493.08233642578125, + 382.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 382.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 397.65496826171875, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 397.65496826171875, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 470.4812316894531, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 470.4812316894531, + 213.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 213.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S .D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 412.1817626953125, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 412.1817626953125, + 543.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 543.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 467.47625732421875, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 467.47625732421875, + 686.7325057983398 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 686.7325057983398 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSD . la. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 413.47174072265625, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 413.47174072265625, + 451.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 451.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 294.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 658.53 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 658.53 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 686.8799999999999 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 686.8799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "et Experts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.2300109863281, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 335.6556396484375, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 335.6556396484375, + 425.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.2300109863281, + 425.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 351.72149658203125, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 351.72149658203125, + 620.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 620.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 88.28999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 192 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 162 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763180" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c5054132c7e1ab236d6c384a389fbdb582ca13d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaihtiff. ps + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF FRED HADDAD, P.A. !FORMERLY HADDAD & NAVARRO, PLLCI AS CO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPDATE FILE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, filed by Fred Haddad, P.A., formerly Haddad & Navarro, PLLC. The Court, having,te d the Motion, and having been advised of the agreement of the parties, hereby, + +ORDERS AND ADJUD that the Motion is GRANTED. Fred Haddad, P.A., formerly Haddad & Navarro, LLC, s ereby discharged as co-counsel of record for PlaintifgCounter-Defendant Je f Epstein in this action and are further relieved of any further obligation, duties or responsi i i this case. + +Th lerk is directed to remove Fred Haddad, P.A., formerly Haddad & Navarro, PLLC, as counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Pal ounty, Florida this il daY of December, 2017. + +> THE HONO CIRCUIT f OUR JU + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 15'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Agreed Order Granting Motion to Withdraw of Fred Haddad, P.A. [Formerly Haddad & Navarro, PLLC] as Co-Counsel of Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and Directions to Clerk to Update File Page 2 + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. Edwards

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████, Jaffee, Weissing, ██████, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
igoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Fred Haddad
Fred Haddad, P.A.
315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
dee@fredhaddadlaw.com

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order Granting Motion to Withdraw of Fred Haddad, +P.A. [Formerly Haddad & Navarro, PLLC] as Co-Counsel of +Record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein and +Directions to Clerk to Update File +Page 3 + +|

Scott J. Link

Kara Berard Rockenbach

Angela M. Many

Link & Rockenbach, P.A.

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Scott@linkrocklaw.com

Kara@linkrocklaw.com

Angela@linkrocklaw.com

Tina@linkrocklaw.com

Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Tanya@linkrocklaw.com

Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d5345810f9e06185083f507a5f62cd5ad7f5a60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204/EFTA02763204.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763204.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 9037, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.54, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF FRED \nHADDAD, P.A. !FORMERLY HADDAD & NAVARRO, PLLCI AS \nCO-COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN AND DIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPDATE FILE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 525.087158203125, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 525.087158203125, + 349.863037109375 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 349.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 349.32720947265625, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 349.32720947265625, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 183.06 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 260 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763204" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0bbf75652c069cc133e7e4350b22bdff658a472 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.md @@ -0,0 +1,608 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S** +**AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, files this Amended Trial Witness List as +follows: + +1. 1. ██████ J. Edwards + c/o ██████ Pottinger LLC + 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +2. 2. Scott W. Rothstein + c/o Marc Nurik + Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +3. 3. ██████ L. Ackerman, Jr. + c/o ██████ Burnett + 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +- 4. William J. Berger do Greenspoon Marder 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 11800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 5. Jonathan Birkman do Quraishi & Birkman, PLLC 809 S.E. Eighth Street Deerfield Beach, FL 33441-5608 +- 6. Wayne Black do Wayne Black & Associates One Brickell Square 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33131 +- 7. W. Chester Jr. do W. Chester Jr., P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 c West Palm Beach, FL 33401 100 S.E. Third Avenue , Suit 0 +- 8. Robert C. Buschel do Buschel Gibbons, P.A. 4 One Financial Plaza Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 +- 9. Paul G. Cassell do Hatch, Jam ge, P.C. 10 West Broadw , ite 400 Salt Lake T 84101 +- 10. d Coleman Haddad, P.A. . Seventh Street, Suite 301 uderdale, FL 33301 IL Robert D. Critton, Jr. do Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 12. Pasquale Pat) do Pat = & Associates, Inc. 2893 Executive Park Drive, Suite 204 Weston, FL 33331 + +- 13. Abraxas (A.J.) Discala Address Unknown +- 14. Jane Doe do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +- 15. Mercedes Address Unknown +- 16. Gary M. l Jr. do Gary M. Jr., P.A. 4420 N.E. 24 Avenue Lighthouse Point, FL 33064-7209 +- 17. Michael Fisten do Blue Line Investigative Solutions 3389 Sheridan Street, Suite 515 Hollywood, FL 33021 +- 18. Christina Fitch Address Unknown +- 19. Shawn Gilbert Address Unknown +- 20. Scott A. Golds do The Law O f Scott P.A. 1880 N. Avenue, Suite 315 Boyrgpn B ch, FL 33426-8678 +- 21. olmes ISheridan St., #129 uderdale, FL 33331-3486 Steven It. Jaffe do Upchurch & Max 900 S. Pine Island Road, Suite 410 Plantation, FL 33324-3922 +- 23. Rodney J. Janis do Goldberg Segalla LLP 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6148 + +- 24. Kenneth C. Jenne Address Unknown +- 25. Jacquie Address Unknown +- 26. Denis A. Kleinfeld do Kleinfeld Legal Advisors, P.A. North Miami Beach, FL 33162-3729 801 N.E. 1676 Street, Suite 306 +- 27. E. Knight 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 do Burnett 2833 N.E. 35th Court +- 28. It Kretschmar do Soaring Eagle Investments, LLC Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308 +- 29. Seth M. Lehrman do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue S , Fort Lauderdale, FL 3 +- 30. Michael Legam do Legamaro B ipal iP 123 Wacker Driv ite 1400 Chicago, +- 31. nknown +- 32. les H. Lichtman o Berger Singerman LLP 350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-4215 +- 33. Carl H. Linder do Greenspoon Marder 600 Brickell Ave., Suite 3600 Miami, FL 33131-3073 + +AO.A + +C O + +"S 94A) + +- 34. Mark T. Luttier do Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 35. L.M. do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +- 36. Maribel Matiska Address Unknown 4. 41mc +- 37. Priscilla Nascimento Address Unknown CO ' +- 38. Marc S. Nurik do Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 39. Michael J. Pike do Pike & Lustig, LLP 2465 Mercer Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33 +- 40. Preve Address Unknot +- 41. Thane Ritchie do Ritchi Addr- UnYno +- 42. berts lue Line Investigative Solutions + Sheridan Street, Suite 515 ollywood, FL 33021 I Management + - 43. David Rogers 7318 Easton Drive Lake Worth, FL 33167 + - 44. Alan B. Sakowitz do Pointe Development Company 1135 Kane Concourse, Floor 3 Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025 + +,S ) + +- 45. Lilly Ann do The LS Law Firm Four Seasons Tower, Suite 1200 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131-3439 +- 46. Jack Scarola do Searcy Denney Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +- 47. William It Scherer do Conrad & Scherer, LLP 633 S. Federal Highway, Suite 800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 48. Jack Simony do Platinum Partners New York, NY +- 49. Susan K. Stirling do Promise Healthcare, Inc. 999 N.W. 51° Street Boca Raton, FL 33431 +- 50. Barry J. 6615 E. Liseron Boynton Beach, L 3437-6481 +- 51. Debra Vil Addrtss U +- 52. ski Pine Point Road ra Beach, FL 33404 +- 53. Linda Von Allmon Address Unknown +- 54. E. W. c/o Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +- 55. Beth Williamson Address Unknown +- 56. Ronald Wise Address Unknown +- 57. Phaedra Xanthos, CPA, CFE 3762 Riverland Road Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 +- 58. An arttall witnesses listed by in case in chief. +- J. , depending o estimony + +## REBUTTAL WITNESSE1 + +O 'S + +- 59. Katherine W. Ezell 4905 S.W. 71' Place Miami, FL 33155-5605 +- 60. Allan M. Garten "S C) 28183 S. Barlow Road Aurora, OR 97002-9321 +- 61. Adam D. Horowitz ?S' do Horowitz Law 425 N. Andrews A e 2 Fort Lauderdale -3268 +- 62. Amy Josefsbergc/o Miami tate Attorney's Office 1350 .W. m Avenue Mini, FL 136-2102 +- 63. Ro. rt C. Josefsberg ÷ odhurst Orseck, P.A. unTrust International Center One S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131-1715 + - 64. Stuart S. Mermeistein do Herman Law Firm, P.A. 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 540 Boca Raton, FL 33486-1018 + +- 65. Richard H. Willits do Richard H. Willits P.A. 490 Wandering IM Way Ponte Vedra, FL 32081-0619 +- 66. Iliana Yartabal do Burnett, P.A. Brickell Arch 1395 Brickell Avenue, Floor 14 Miami, FL 33131-3371 +- 67. Any and all witnesses whose names appear in depositions documents produced in response to requests production depending on the testimony in case in + +## EXPERT WITNESS + +- 68. D. Culver Skip) III Telephone: 598-6800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 AS , Culver III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 69 + +Subject Matter: Mr. w \ tify isto legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause and professional r tion. + +Substance of the F available before the pendency o inions: The pleadings and information that was I civil proceeding was initiated and discovered during nal civil proceeding and deposition testimony. + +Summary opini unds for Each Opinion: Mr. has not reached his final + +: A copy of Mr. Curricula Vitae is attached as Exhibit A. + +reserves the right to list and/or call any and all newly discovered witnesses upon proper no e and to call and/or produce any and all additional witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal. Epstein reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this Witness List upon proper notice to the parties and the Court. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: T +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@scarcylaw.com
jsx@scarcylaw.com
scarolateam@scarcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## D. Culver 111 CURRICULUM VITAE + +CULVER III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 www.culversmithlaw.com + +ofc 561.598.6800 lax 561.598.6801 cell 561.301.3800 csmithgculverscnithlaw.com + +#### OCCUPATION/PROFESSION + +Lawyer and consultant + +Practice emphasis: Counseling and representation of lawyers, law firms, and others on-ethics, professional responsibility, professional disciplinary proceedings, sanctions, disqualification, unlicensed practice of law, malpractice, and loss prevention; service as expert witness in litigation involving such matters; conduct of ethics audits for law firms; counseling and representation of applicants for admission or reinstatement to the bar; counseling and representation of public officials and employees on ethics compliance and complaints; conduct of internal corporate investigations; service as special magistrate, arbitrator, and mediator; representation and consultation on appeals in all courts. More than forty-five years of experience in the field, as well as experience in law-firm management. + +## EXPERIENCE 'S di 9 + +Counsel for respondents in hundreds of lawyeetattpli S' ry, unlicensed-practice-of-law, and baradmission proceedings, including appeals In the Supreme Court of Florida + +Representation in dozens of disqualific sanctions proceedings + +Testifying/consulting expert in nurtlerpus,cases involving lawyer ethics and professionalresponsibility issues + +Wide variety of civil litigation ind apipeals, including matters involving contracts, business torts, professional responsibility and malpractice, corporate and partnership relationships, officer and director liability, and, trust and estate disputes. + +#### EDUCATION AND LICENSING + +Bachelor of Arts, Washington and Lee University, 1964 + +Doctor of Jurisprudence, Washington and Lee University College of Law, 1969 (replaced LLB. conferred 1967) + +Admitted to practice in: + +Florida, 1967 + +California, 1972 (now inactive) + +U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida + +U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit + +#### PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY + +Law Clerk to Judge T. Shannon, Jr., and Judge Robert T. M, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, 1967-1968 (summarized briefs and records-on-appeal, researched law, drafted opinions) Associate, l=" Paine & S P.A., West Palm Beach, 1968 (associate in midsize law firm for four months before commencing active military duty; researched law, drafted pleadings and briefs, conducted depositions, and handled motion hearings) Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Naval Reserve, 1968-1972 (active duty as military lawyer: two years at Naval Law Center, San Diego, CA, prosecuting and defending courts-martial cases; two years as staff judge advocate at Naval Air Station Miramar ("Ffghtertown U.S.A."), San Diego, CA, advising commanding officer on wide variety of military and Civilian legal matters) Associate, John W. Dell, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1972-1974 (associate In small, general-practice law firm; handled various litigation and nonlitigation matters) Shareholder, Dell and P.A., West Palm Beach, 1974-1977 (shareholder in small, generalpractice law firm; handled various litigation matters, it iti ing personal-injury and commercial cases) Shareholder, =, Coogler, P.A., West Im Beach, 1977-1981 (shareholder in small-to-midsize insurance-defense firm; handled defense of personal-injury, product-liability, and professional-malpractice cases) Partner, Steel Hector & LLP, West Palm Beach, 1981-1991 (senior litigator in large, Miamibased law firm's West Palm Beach office; chaired office litigation department; recruited, trained, and supervised litigation associates and legal assistants; handled wide variety of complex civil business litigation, professional-malpractice cases, and probate litigation) Shareholder, =, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1992-1997 (shareholder in midsize general-practice law firm; handled wide variety of civil business litigation and probate litigation) Partner, Holland & Knight;LLP, West Palm Beach, 1997-2002 (senior litigator in international law firm's West Palm Beach office; handled wide variety of civil business litigation, probate litigation, and appeals; served as office Executive Partner, 1998-2002) Shareholder, D, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2002-2007 trial and appellate practice; -subst.intial focus on lawyer ethics and professional responsibility) Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm Beach, 2007-2010 (senior litigator in national law firm's West Palm Beach office) Shareholder, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2010—date (M legal and consulting practice; substantial focus on ethics, professional responsibility, and related matters; appellate representation and consultation) + +#### PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE + +The Florida Bar: + +Member, Board of Governors, 1984-1988 (Executive Committee, 1987-1988) + +Member, Professional Ethics Committee, 2001-2007,2010-2016 (Chairperson, 2004-2005, 2006-2007) + +Member, Vision 2016 Commission, 2013-2016 (Chairperson, MJP/Reciprocity- a e us Committee, Bar Admissions Subgroup, 2013-2016) + +Member, Standing Committee on Professionalism, 1989-1993, 2016—d e hairperson, 1989-1992) + +Member, Hawkins Commission on Discipline System, 2011-2012 + +Member, Special Committee to Review 2002 ABA Model RyF s, 02-2006 + +Member, Ethics 2000 Review Panel, 2001 + +Member, Law-Related Education Committee, 2007-4\ 0 1 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1987-1989,, 992-2001 (Chairperson, 1988-1989, 1993-1994) (author/editor of Meeting the Challenges: A Strategic Plan for the Florida Bar, 1993) + +Member, Special Committee to Study Composition of Board of Governors, 1996-1997 + +Vice Chairperson, Commission on Lawyer Professionalism, 1987-1989 (principal author of Florida Bar Ideals and Goals of Professionalism and Florida Lawyer's Creed of Professionalism (adopted 1990, superseded 2015)) + +Chairperson, Special Committee on Priorities for the 1990s, 1986-1987 + +Member, Special Committee to Study Reapportionment of the Board of Governors, 1986-1987 (author of The Florida Bar's answer and counterpetition in Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules lie luting the Florida Bar (Reapportionment), 518 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1987) (adopting Flo ' a roposed plan for apportionment of Board of Governors)) + +M , Pr gram Evaluation Committee, 1984-1988 (Chairperson, 1986-1988) + +Chair son, Special Study Committee on Lawyer Referral Services, 1985-1986 + +Member, Special Study Committee on Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 1983-1984 + +Member, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee, 1977-1980 (Chairperson, 1979-1980) + +Member, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, 1974-1979 + +Member, Trial Lawyers Section and Appellate Practice Section + +#### Palm Beach County Bar Association: + +President, 1982-1983 + +President-Elect, 1981-1982 + +Secretary, 1979-1981 + +Member, Board of Directors, 1977-1984 + +President, Young Lawyers Section, 1976-1977 + +Member, Professionalism Committee, 1990-1991, 2004-date (Co-Chair n, 2 -2012) + +Member,. & Small Firm Practitioners Committee, 2011-2012 + +Member, Judicial Campaign Practices Commission, 2002,2004,700 , 2012,2014, 2016 + +Member, Historical Committee, 2003-2009 (Chairperson,\_2003-2005,2006-2009) + +Member, Historic Courtroom Fundraising Committee, 2007-2008 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1994-1996,2001-2002 + +Member, Revitalization of the Bar Committee, 1999-2000 + +Chairperson, Bulletin Editorial Committee, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Circuit Court Civil Practfetemmittee N , 1979 + +Chairperson, New Member Orietitition Committee, 1976-1977 + +Chairperson, Membership Comm 1974-1976 + +#### American College of Trial Law ters:\_,/ + +Fellow, 1996-date + +Membernlorida State Committee, 2004-2009 + +Member, Legal Ethics and Professionalism Committee (f/k/a Legal Ethics Committee), 1997- 2002,2005-2013 + +tik?frperson, 2008 Tri-State Meeting Committee, 2006-2008 + +### Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers: + +Member, 2005—date + +Member, Program Committee, 2006, 2008-2010, 2014—date (Chairperson, 2008-2010) + +#### Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers: + +Charter member, 2009—date (member, Board of Directors, 2009—date) + +#### American Bar Association: + +Member, Center for Professional Responsibility + +Member, Section of Litigation + +#### The Florida Bar Foundation: + +Member, Board of Directors, 1988-1992 (Executive Committee, 1990-1 + +Member, Development Committee, 1995-1996,2000-2005 + +Member, Improvements in the Administration of Justice IOTA GrantEComdtittee, om ittee, 1992-1994, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Investment Committee, 1991-1992 + +Vice Chairperson, Law Student Assistance IOTA Grant Committee, 1990-1992 + +Member, Legal Assistance for the Poor IOTA GrantCoMmittee, 1988-1991 + +Chairperson, 2004 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +Member, Steering Committee, 2010 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +### Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc. + +Member, Board of Directors, 2011-2016 + +#### Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc. + +Member, Board;of Directors, 2016—date + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Committee, 1992-1996 (Chairperson, 1994- 1995) ( + +Chairperson, Ad'Hoc Magistrate Selection Panel, United States District Court, Southern District of FloAfir1987 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Media Committee, 2005-2009 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Indigent Services Committee, 2007-2008 + +#### PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1987 + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1994 + +Professionalism Award, Palm Beach County Bar Association, 2002 + +Outstanding Past Local Bar President, Florida Council of Bar Presidents, 2005 + +#### LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS + +"The Pink Elephant in the Office," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullets S per 2017, pp. 19, 22 + +"Earned Fees to Be Shared Between Counsel—Operating Account or T st Account?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2017, p. 5 + +"The New 'Florida Bar Professionalism Expectations'—What N Association Bulletin, January 2016, p. 5 lm Beach County Bar + +"The Monster in the Closet: Trust-Account Responsibilit " Bulletin, February 2015, p. 9 A each County Bar Association + +"'Unprofessional' Versus 'Unethical' (Caution: Itpnery toad Ahead)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2014, p. + +"The Supreme Court's New 'Code for Resolving fessionalism Complaints," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July/August 2013, p. 6 + +\ "Motions to Withdraw: Euphewnsrn on Parade," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2012, p. 11 ( k/ + +'Tribute to a Mentor," Palm Bettaitounty Bar Association Bulletin, April 2012, p. 10 + +"Can You Hear Me Nov?)ndSho Else Is Listening?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2011,-p. 19 + +Code of Pretrial and Trial Conduct Teaching Syllabus, American College of Trial Lawyers, Irvine, 2011 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Dance of the Lawyer Expert: What Ethical Issues and When?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, September 2010, p. 13 + +"Through the Looking M: When Is an 'Earned Retainer' Earned?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2009, p. 7 + +"Terminal One-Upmanship and Other Phenomena of the Lawyering Life," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2009, p. 7 + +"Threatening Disciplinary Proceedings: In the Mind of the Beholder?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2007, p. 13 + +"Outsourcing Legal Work: Smart Practice Management or Ethical Quagmire?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, April 2007, p. 13 + +"Lawyers' Ancillary Businesses," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, March 2007, p. 13 + +"The Adversary System: A Matter of Theology?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2006, p. 13 + +"Investigators Gone-: Who Pays the Tab in a Blame-the-Lawyers World?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Metadata: What Are the Ethical Implications?" Palm Beach County Bar Association-Bulletin, June 2006, p. 7 + +Chapter 1, "Theories of Liability," Professional Liability of Lawyers in Flori a th e ., the Florida Bar, Tallahassee, 2006, (also authored same chapter in earlier editions) + +"Business Transactions With a Client: Are You a Lawyer or an Entre ren Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2005, p. 17 + +"Identifying the Client: The First Line of Defense," Palm Bep Co Bar Association Bulletin, January 2005, pp. 15-16 + +"Confidentiality and the 'Snitch Rule': An Ethical C Bulletin, December 2004 Im Beach County Bar Association + +Report of the Legal Ethics Committee of the American College of Trial Lawyers on Duties of Confidentiality, American College of al Lawyers, Irvine, CA, 2001 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Bar Looks at the Future," The F Journal, vol. 71, no. 5, May 1997, p. 32 + +## LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS + +"Professionalism Expectations and Contentious Cases;' at Palm Beach County Bar Association LLC Member Disputes seminar, West Palm Beach, June 16, 2017 + +"Professionalis%N)-at Palm Beach County Bar Association Modification of Parenting Plans: Seven Practical Tips Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 28, 2017 + +"Great ExPectations: Professionalism Expectations for Florida Lawyers," at The Florida Bar Putting the "ratio ifrofessionalism symposium, West Palm Beach, April 21, 2017 (panelist) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 2: Permissible Lawyer-Expert Testimony—What Can You Get Into Evidence?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, August 1, 2015 (moderator) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 1," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Houston, February 7, 2015 (moderator) + +"Ethical Considerations: Your License Is in Play," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Spying Spouses: Divorce in a World of Cyber Warfare and E-Everything seminar, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2013 + +"The Tangled Web of Ethics, Advertising, Websites & Social Media," at The Florida Bar Family Law Section webinar, September 11, 2013 (panelist) + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With Lawyer-Referral and Legal Support Services," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 22, 2012 (including written materials) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, May 2, 2012 (panelist) + +"Ethics Workshop," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Islan bruary 10, 2012 (panelist) + +"The New Oath of Admission," at Florida Association for Women Lawyers Pal Chapter luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 9, 2011 (panelist) Act iCounty + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With For-Profit Referral and Legal-Sup s," at Palm Beach County Bar Association & Small Firm Practitioners luncheon, Im Beach, November 2, 2011 + +"Lawyer Ancillary Business: What Hat Are You Wearing Today—Lawyer or Entrepreneur?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meejir > Sianrancisco, August 6, 2010 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lormart-Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including written materials) + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including-Titten materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (includingventen materials) + +"Commercial Litigation," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Bench-Bar Conference, West Palm Beach, February 19, 2010 (panelist) + +"Ripped From the Case Er Corporate Internal Investigations, Multiple Representations, and U.S. v. Ruehle," at Arnerican'iBankruptcy Institute Caribbean Insolvency Symposium, Boca Raton, February 14291'.1(panelist and counsel for Appellee in mock oral argument) + +"Ethics an Pro The Rothstein Scandal & Beyond," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program Leadership luncheon Series, Coral Gables, January 26, 2010 (panelist) + +"Evidentiary Foundations and Objections," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Judicial Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 16, 2009 (moderator) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2009 (panelist) + +"Tanned, Rested, and Ready—Now What? The Practical Side of Expert-Witnessing," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, July 31, 2009 (moderator/panelist) + +Firm Counsel Project Roundtable, at American Bar Association National Legal Malpractice Conference, Miami, April 23, 2009 (moderator) + +"Opening Remarks," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, Deerfield Beach, February 18, 2009 + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2008 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Professionalism: How to Build Your Reputation & Keep Your License," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program seminar, Coral Gables, September 9, 2008 (panelist) + +"Trial and Pretrial Conduct on Paper and in Practice: A Cut Above the Ordinary," Aa q n cuit Bench & Bar Conference, Colorado Springs, September 5, 2008 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lorman Educational Service el , E ics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials'' + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics iri Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Leg4Ethics inFlorida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) 7 , + +Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judicial Campaign Conduct Forum, West Palm Beach, May 8, 2008 (panelist) + +"Leadership Through Service," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Leadership Academy—The Art of Leadership program, West Palm Beach, April 25, 2008 (panelist) + +What Tangled Webs We Weave: Conflicts of Interest in Trust & Estate Practice," at The Florida Bar Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section Trust & Estate Symposium: Litigating Under Florida's New Trust Code, Fort emir and Tampa, February 7 and 8, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Pal Beach County Bar Association Professionalism Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beac , February 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigators (and Lawyers) Gone-: The Ethical Ramifications of Pretexting and Undercover Investigations," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Island, February 1, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigatad Lawyers) Gone-: The Ramifications of Covert and Deceptive Tactics," at National Association of Legal Investigators conference, Fort Lauderdale, January 25, 2008 + +"DealingWIth Difficult Opposing Counsel," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, December 3, 2007 (panelist) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, FL, November 2, 2007 (panelist) + +"Ethics Shrugged: Supervising Outside Agents in a Blame-the-Lawyers World," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 29, 2007 (including written materials) + +"Dealing With Difficult Clients," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, FL, May 16, 2007 (panelist) + +"You Can't Always Say What You Want: Limits on Lawyer Speech Post-Fieger," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Miami Beach, February 9, 2007 (moderator/panelist) + +"Achieving Success in the Practice of Law: Lessons Learned in Thirty-Nine Years at the Bar," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Lunch With the Legends Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2006 + +"Ethical Concerns Regarding Attorneys' Ancillary Businesses," at The Florida Bar Masters', Seminar on Ethics, Boca Raton, June 23, 2006 (including written materials) ("Masters Seminaergo rni l thics") + +"Conflicts of Interest," at American College of Trial Lawyers Current Developmen Civil Procedure, Evidence and Legal Ethics seminar, Hollywood, April 6, 2006 (including terials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at CLE International Ethics seminar, Tampa, Febr 6 (including written materials) + +) "Update on the New Rules of Professional Conduct," at Palm Beach County-Bar Association 14th Annual Professionalism Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 8, 2.005`(1 A + +"Final Arguments," at National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA), m 2 erican College of Trial Lawyers, and Florida Legal Services, Inc., Critical Trial Skills for Legal Services Attorneys seminar, Deerfield Beach, January 3-6, 2005 (faculty member) + +"Ethics & the Unauthorized Practice of Law: How Paralegals Are Affected," at Paralegal Association of Florida 26th Annual Meeting & Seminar, West Palm Beach, September 20, 2002 + +"Avoiding Legal Malpractice," at Professional Education Systems Institute The Briar Potch: Thorny Issues in Florida Civil Litigation seminar, Dania, August 20, 2002 (including written materials) + +"Avoiding Malpractice," at PalniBeich County Bar Association Family Law seminar, West Palm Beach, December 8, 2000( V + +"Ethical Challenges Facing Today's dttorney," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 9th Annual Ethics and Professionalism Workshop and Seminar, West Palm Beach, May 31, 2000 + +"Applied Ethics," at the Palm Beach County Bar Association North County Section Ethics Seminar and Luncheon, North Palm Beach, May 26, 1999 + +"Avoiding aloractiee Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP. and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, Wes Beach, January 15, 1999 + +"AveferirMalpractice Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, West Palm Beach, November 5, 1997 + +Palm Beach County Bar Association A Study in Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, April 29, 1996 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Malpractice," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 4th Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, June 2, 1995 + +"Making the Standards of Professionalism Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 3rd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 18, 1993 + +"Jury System—New Approaches," at American Inns of Court chapter meeting, West Palm Beach, February 11,1993 (panelist) + +"Professionalism in Litigation Practice Outside the Courtroom," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 2nd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 28,1992 + +"Making the Standards Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 1st Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, March 22,1991 + +ii "Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at Nova Southeastern University School of Law ri tation assembly, Fort Lauderdale, August 16,1990 + +"Conversations on Professionalism," at Rumger Professional Issues Forum, Or c 7l ) anuary 1990 (panelist) + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly admitted arid awyers, West Palm Beach, October 30,1987 + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly acknifftitl Florida lawyers, West Palm - \ Beach, May 31,1985 + +"The Bar and Its Works," at West Palm Beach Rotary Club luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 7,1985 + +#### CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE + +Member, Board of Directors, Hanley Centertx idatrUn, Inc. (d/b/a Hanley Foundation), 2013—date (Treasurer, 2015—date) + +Member, Board of Directors, Educatfbn F ration of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1986-2009 (President, 1989-1991,19924995k; Chairperson, 2002-2003; Honorary Co-Chairperson, 25th Anniversary Spirit of Youti(Awards ()Inner, February 19, 2009) + +Member, State Board of Directors, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2005-2008 (Member, Governance Committee, 2007-2008) + +Member, Division Advisory Board, South Coastal Division, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2002-2011 (Chairperson, Bylaws Committee, 2007-2010; Co-Chairperson, Fund Development Committee, 2010-2011) + +Member, Picardie( Directors, Nelle Residence for Girls, Inc., 1982-1989,1997-2009 Oresident, 1986-1988,1997-2000,2002-2009) + +Member, Roger Stadium Advisory Board, 2002—date (Chairperson, 2013-2014) + +Member, Board of Directors, Greater West Palm Beach Division, Florida/Puerto Rico Affiliate, American Heart Association, 2001-2003 + +Member, Economic Council of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1988-2002 (Member, Education Committee, 1989-1992, 1994-1998; Member, Executive Committee, 1994-1995; Member, Task Force on the Florida Constitution, 1997-1998; Member, Strategic Action Committee, 2000-2002) + +Co-Chairperson, Steering Committee, Principals Leadership Training Institute (joint project of the School Board of Palm Beach County and the Education Foundation of Palm Beach County), 2003-2004 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Candidates Citizens Interview Committee, 1995 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Strategic Planning Committee, 1988-1992 Member, Palm Beach County Court Facilities Planning Committee, 1986-1987 Member, Coordinating Committee, Project Mosaic (community-wide collaboration to develop strategies for achieving stable racial balance in Palm Beach County's public schools), 1989-1991 Member, Steering Committee, Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Qualifications Forum, 1995 -- Member, Palm Beach County Champions, WorldClass Schools, 1995-1999 (Chairperson, 1995-1997) Member, Campaign Cabinet, United Way of Palm Beach County, Inc , 2001-2002 Member, Board of Directors, Zoological Society of the Palm Beaches,Inc., 1970s Member, Board of Directors, Legal Aid Society of Palm BeacliCroUnty, 1981-1990 , Member, Board of Directors, YMCA of the Palm Beaches, Inc., 1983-1986 Member, Society for American Baseball Research (SABR), 1997—date (Co-Chairperson, Host Committee, 2000 Annual Convention Sustaining member, Friends of the LFBIne (National Baseball ■ **of Fame and Museum, Inc.), 1999—date Member, Board of Directors, ect Park/Southland Park Homeowners Association, 1987- 1988 Member, Palm Beach Comer, Washington and Lee University Alumni Association (Chairperson, 1985-1990)** + +# **MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS** + +**I , "The Inquisitor General," Palm Beach Post, February 22,2010, p. A13 (op-ed.) "SticklersUnite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 3)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2009, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 2)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2008, p. 16 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 1)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2008, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Save Only, the Lonely!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2008, p.17** + +"Sticklers Unite! Ban Verbing the Noun!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2008. pp. 11, 21 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Semicolonitis!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2007, p. 17 + +"Sticklers Unite! Save the Apostrophe!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2007, p. 18 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Death by Comma!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullgin, March 2007, pp. 18-19 + +From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society fo-rarberican Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000 (editor) + +"From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Spring Home to Record-Setters," From MCGillicdgdy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 3-5 + +"All-Time Florida-Born Major League Baseball Team," From McGillkuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseba litesr, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 15-16 + +#### MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS + +"Public Education: The Lifeblood of Democracy," Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Spirit of Youth Awards dinner, West Palm Beach, January 30, 2003 + +"Citizenship and the Search for Justice," given at Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Week luncheon, Palm Beach, September 16, 1996 + +"The Future of Public Education," given at Sun-Sentinel "The '90s: Palm Beach County Faces the Future" forum, Lake Worth, May 15;1990 + +#### PERSONAL + +- -77 Born and reared in West Palm Beach, Florida (fourth-generation resident) + +Married to Dr. Donna Marks; two children, two grandchildren, three stepchildren, and three step-grandchildren + +Hobbies and interests: + +'Baseball—past, present, and future + +Piano + +Lexicology, syntax, and writing style \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3e970111e3017023b769323a6fcb337ff32de1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207/EFTA02763207.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1518 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763207.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 24, + "chars": 40700, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.14, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 368.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REBUTTAL WITNESSE1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.040771484375, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.040771484375, + 265.863037109375 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 265.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.308, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 362.8977355957031, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 362.8977355957031, + 293.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 250.308, + 293.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 498.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Culver 111 \nCURRICULUM VITAE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6950378417969, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6950378417969, + 70.33056640625 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 70.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCCUPATION/PROFESSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 186.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERIENCE 'S di 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 372.570556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 372.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION AND LICENSING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 542.8305816650391 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 542.8305816650391 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 135.45416259765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 135.45416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Palm Beach County Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 116.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 116.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American College of Trial Law ters:_,/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 609.4540710449219 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 609.4540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 687.0840835571289 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 687.0840835571289 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 135.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 135.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Foundation:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 213.4541015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 213.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 420.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 420.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 232.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 232.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 470.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 470.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 384.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 384.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 498.532958984375 + ], + [ + 289.7206115722656, + 498.532958984375 + ], + [ + 289.7206115722656, + 549.3151702880859 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 549.3151702880859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 365.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 365.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 496.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 496.9540710449219 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763207" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c54094f3f0fe1219fcdf9a3570ea9ff119cef8c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXABAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFR Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS + +7 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep steins), respectfully moves the Court to allow his disclosure of an expert witness + +- 4 +- 1. Pursuant to this Co 017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial (D.E. 938) the disclosure of experts retain to f late an expert opinion was due 60 days prior to trial. At that time, trial was set on er 5, 2017, making the deadline October 6, 2017. +- 2. Eps ' 's nt trial counsel were retained after this deadline and, on November 6, 2017, in certainty of what issues would be tried and the numerous outstanding evidenti 'NISI moved for a continuance of the trial and to extend the pre-trial deadlines, including extension of expert disclosures. (D.E. 1035.) +- 3. On November 14, 2017, the Court granted the continuance request and continued the special set trial to March 13, 2018. The Court's Order, however, did not address Epstein's + +request for an extension of the pre-trial deadlines. (D.E. 1057.) If that request was granted, the new deadline for expert disclosures would have been January 12, 2018. + +4. Counsel went before the Court on November 27, 2017, to clarify the Court's ruling. The Court granted the Motion made by Defendant/Counter-Defendant a ") to reconfirm the existing pm-trial deadlines because of his concern ove additional discovery. The Court, however, noted that it would permit additional limited ery upon further motion. (D.E. 1086.) 'SY + +5. On November 29, December 5 and December 7, 201 e ek es participated in extensive special set hearings wherein the Court made rulings 'ng e issues and evidence to be presented at trial. Although the Court did not mac t l,o issues, in light of the rulings made during those hearings, Epstein believes he n s, in an expert to testify about legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause an ards' professional reputation. Epstein retained C. Culver M, III for this pu "cLaiean isclosed him on December 15, 2017. + +6. will not b by this disclosure at this juncture because has ample time to take Mr. Sm sition before trial. Epstein will not oppose an extension of the discovery deadline r' purpose. To the contrary, Epstein will be prejudiced if he is not allowed to make disclot and rely upon Mr. expert testimony at trial. + +Acco , Epstein respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and allow his disclo as an expert witness. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. ████████ (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +mep@scarcylaw.com +jsx@scarcylaw.com +scarolateam@scarcylaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +████████ J. ████████ + +Nichole J. Segal +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +████████ J. ████████ + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..256c9c493f005649da6347422fdefd665873814c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231/EFTA02763231.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763231.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6049, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFR Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 484.37999999999994 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763231" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3405ced6ddc0d79a87c72f23f6facf51b1a9b162 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TM JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +COMPLEX LITIGATION Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 - Civil - DIY + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 JUDGE: AG - David + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, .1. and L.M., individually, individually, + +Defendants. + +A (-J o g ) F S tn~r T-3 rro ce? + +## STIPULATION FOR ORDER O. DMLSSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO L.M., INDIVIDUALLY. ONLY + +The parties to this case, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, and the Defendant, L.M., individually, by and through their undersigned counsel, hertbystipulate and agree that this case may be dismissed only as to Defendant, L.M., with prejudice and each party to this Stipulation shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs. The parties, through their counsel, further stipulate that the Court may enter the Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to Defendant, L.M. only, that is attached to this Stipulation. It is not the intent of this Stipulation, nor does this Stipulation Dismiss the other parties. + +Respectfully submitted, + +'Fii, M At— DATED Ibis day oft ly, 2010. + +WEISSING, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste 2 F. uderdale, FL 33301 2820 822 Fax + +ary M. Jr. orida Bar No. 914444 + +BURNETT, P.A. EPoint, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 fax + +By: L. Ack6rman, Jr. ilorida Bar No. 235954 + +Rodney J. Janis, Florida Bar No. 647896 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +Nos tdo9 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this if ilcIrt °fatty:- 2010 to: + +MM. =, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Mare s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +(HO + +1/S 9 + +By: LCskyvv49A' + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Rodney J. Janis Fla. Bar No. 647896 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Hagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc7ed7d19bd26463f3993ccddd9857be43ccfc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235/EFTA02763235.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763235.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2347, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "STIPULATION FOR ORDER O. DMLSSAL WITH PREJUDICE \nAS TO L.M., INDIVIDUALLY. ONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.34, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 478.9886169433594, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 478.9886169433594, + 391.8445739746094 + ], + [ + 158.34, + 391.8445739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.90099999999998, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 382.9195556640625, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 382.9195556640625, + 166.4696044921875 + ], + [ + 236.90099999999998, + 166.4696044921875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763235" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e7d9e77fb4df2076ae98308760670435ae88669 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.md @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJ Ny4 TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND ECrEXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste ) hereby files his Objections to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. wards") Second Amended Exhibit List dated December 7, 2017, and states: + +### P TATEMENT + +On November 9, 2017, ds filed his Amended Exhibit List identifying 142 exhibits. (D.E. 1043.) On Novem , 2017, Epstein filed his Objections to EM' exhibits. (D.E. 1058.) In additi November 17, 2017, Epstein filed his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine which, in cd those objections. (D.E. 1070.) The Court heard extensive arguments on Epste tions at special set hearings on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, and made rulings on those objections. While, to date, an Order has not been entered memorializing those rulings, Epstein incorporates them herein. + +On December 7, 2017, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List identifying 218 exhibits, which modified some of his earlier disclosed exhibits and identified 79 new items.' (D.E. 1109.) At no time during the special set hearings did counsel advise the Court that he intended to amend the Exhibit List or that the panics and Court were working from an incorrect list. + +Epstein will be filing a renewed Motion in Limine to address 7 ziri ilti4 disclosed ., exhibits. For ease of reference, Epstein has highlighted the changes and n c5' identified. + +C) + +2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance < PC)C I — All Objections 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed by o unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 9 — Other (please identify basis b 10 — Completeness 11 — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Cou r Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper e ibit 14 — Trade secre nfidetitial e evidence + +# LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS: + +## OBJECTIONS + +| No.4 | %•-1 Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 1. | II applicable criminal statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3, 4, 7, II, 12 | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | | + +While produced many of the new exhibits on November 9, 2017, he never identified them as trial exhibits on his Exhibit List and Epstein was not aware that he intended to rely on them at trial at the time of filing his Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy:

A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | +| 11. | ██████████ phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 14 | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection !
01/18/10 | 3, 4, 8 | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 24. | 2002 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 25. | 2001 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home (from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13. This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein | | +| | | 3,4, 10,S? | +| | | „ 14 | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Victim | , 6, 7, 8,14 | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report d | | +| | All reports and documentation generated by h | | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by c Police | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey E t 's rcraft and | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights key Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey E•frsteeii | | +| | 7 berto Pinto regarding | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's ban tEments | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein tpreturns | | +| 56. | MC2 ' s inv communications of Jeffrey Epstein, | | +| | Je er, aritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc | | +| | B nel d Amanda Grant | | +| 57. | lea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | +| 58. | ranscript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4,13 | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department | | +| | Incident Report dated | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community | | + +| No. | | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 63. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, Document says | +| 65. | | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 1 document | +| | | provided • reflective | +| | | of d 'on) | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | 3, 12, 14 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler | | +| 69. | Palm Beach Police Department incident Report dated | 3, f f | +| 70. | | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorn- dat | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | y ated | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | tto ey dated | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assi | tat Attorney dated | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin | State Attorney dated | +| 75. | Letter from Goldbe r t | 22-06 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued | to Grand Jury 3, 4, 7, 8,13 | +| 77. | Documents rela | rental of a vehicle for | +| | ? S" | | +| 78. | Itt -• Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | 3,4,7, 8 | +| 81. | Police report regarding | picking up money 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3,4, 7, 8, 10 | + +| No. | | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3,4,7, 8 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8 1 | +| 89. | Flight information for | 3, 4, 7 0, 1 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3 , 0, 11 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes:re Maria | 3, 8, 10, 12 | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | c , 4, 12 (document | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech | 3,4, 12 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to 1Crisher dated 5-1-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 95. | Police Report dat | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 96. | Victim's school records and | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter. Vi | •j is 09/03/08 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan ss | at Jeffrey Epstein's home 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 99. | Victim's Medical R | m Dr. Randee Speciale 3,4, 6,7, 8 | +| | 100. All surveillan | cted by law enforcement on Jeffrey | +| | Epstein' me | | +| | 101. Email | ived from Palm Beach Records related to | +| | Je n | | +| 102. | I Stem listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report | 3, 4, 7, 8,12 (items not | +| | L or Property Receipti | provided) | +| 1 | copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| | 104. Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 109. reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not an exhibit | +| 110. reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his | Not an exhibit | +| 111. By listing an Exhibit, | is not waiving his right to Not an ex an | +| 112. All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to | N 'bit | +| on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestati • | k | +| | 3, , 8, 12, 13 | +| 114. Motions for Summary Judgment, all a | c , 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 116. All deposition testimony and discove | ses by | +| 117. All pleadings filed by Epstein | a bankruptcy | +| 118. All submissions by Epste | ection with the | +| 119. All Settlement Agre | en en Epstein and victims of | +| 120. Phone Journal | n from Epstein's home and produced to | +| the FBI by Alfr | odriguez | +| 121. Photo ep ing | Ghislaine Maxwell and 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| P • ce w | | +| 122. 1 logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 1 ails produced by Defendant and/or all emails | | +| 124. Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative | +| 126. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| 127. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012 | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital re: Virginia Guiffre, 2001 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (signed by Matt Groening). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the Special Master | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Photo Virginia (Marla-Lago). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 137. | Color photo of [REDACTED] on ferry "New York" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Time Square | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 139. | [REDACTED] photo on back of ship | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 140. | Picture of room in New York | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 141. | Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 142. | Color photo of Virginia [REDACTED] at Zorro Ranch standing in front of gate sign with "Z" (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 143. | Virginia Roberts photo on horse front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 144. | Virginia Roberts photo standing against rocks (red coat) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 145. | Virginia [REDACTED] standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo [REDACTED]; back date). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 146. | Virginia [REDACTED] photo riding horse blue jacket far | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 147. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse hand up | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 148. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 149. | [REDACTED] photo outside next to tables | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 150. | [REDACTED] photo red coat leaning on rail | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 151. | photo standing outside next to fireplace | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 152. | photo standing in front of ranch | 3 4 7 8 | +| 153. | photo with hand over head(blaclQ | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 154. | photo standing next to piand | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 155. | photo in front of fireplace(museum) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 156. | photo in front of wagon in museum | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 157. Color photo | of-in front of | museum 3 4 | +| 159. | (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2 | ,7, 8 | +| 160. Cover photo book 2 | | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 161. Scenic photo (with back photo | | 3 4 7 8 | +| 162. Scenic photo (with back photo | | 0,4, 7, 8 | +| 163. Scenic photo (with back photo whit | | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 164. Scenic photo (with back photo wifit | | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 165. | steps wit head | 3 4 7 8 | +| 166. Scenic photo (with back photo | i ) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 167. Scenic photo (with back photo aj | | 3 4 7 8 | +| 168. Scenic photo | back photo= | 3 4 7 8 | +| 169. Scenic | o back photo | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 170. S | • h with back photo and black). | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 171. c | oto (with back photo and black) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 1 is photo (with back photo | and black) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 173. | on steps with children (with back photd | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 174. | on street wall (far)Awith back | 3 4 7 8 | +| photo | and black). | | +| 175. iFravel envelope | | 3,4,7,8 | +| 176. Sin | re Airlines Travel Cover with handwritten notes by 3, 4, 7, 8 | | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 177. | [Thailand Hotel Receipts] | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 178. | Court Docket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 179. | [Typed List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of [REDACTED] in Australia (Redacted) 03/17/11 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 185. | Airport Codes (Demonstrative) | 3, 7, 8, 10 | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk (Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (only photo of DVDs provided) | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 190. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 192. | Folder titled Sara Kellen: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 14 | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach Police Department | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 199. Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol 11) 09/08/09 | 3 4 7 8 | +| 200. Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100 | 3, 4 | +| 201. Passport application; issued January 12, 2001 | 3 4 7 8 10 | +| 202. Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodrigud | 3, 4, 6,_Z | +| 203. Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguei | 3, 4, 6,3 | +| 204. Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodrigud | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 205. Photos of Jeffrey | Epstein's properties and planed 3, 4,/ 0 | +| 206. Photos of Jeffrey | Epstein employees and former employed 3 S , 0 | +| 207. Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents' | 3 | +| 208. Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Pu | ' _, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 209. Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces TeQ | i r | +| 210. All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, | u | +| Produce and Responses, Requests for | sio and | +| 211. Any and all documents produced n | 's a ion. 12 | +| 212. Any and all depositions tak | ' ction. 12, 13 | +| 213. Any documents or oth | i ched to or used during | +| 214. Any and all exhibits, | ents, etc. referred to in any | +| 215. Any and all d | and exhibits designated by all | +| parties t is a | | +| 216. Any and | c exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | +| t i | | +| 217. an II pleadings filed in this action | 12,13 | +| 2 | and all records produced or that will be produced by | + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ocklAiw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(S• Sie• i r Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad7a8ceba391c2b586fb7c619ca825157a4bbde1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237/EFTA02763237.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,615 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763237.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 51996, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJ Ny4 TO DEFENDANT/ \nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND ECrEXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.87933349609375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 504.87933349609375, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "P TATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 390.74603271484375, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 390.74603271484375, + 450.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 450.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 227.501220703125, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 227.501220703125, + 307.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 307.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 348.3616027832031, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 348.3616027832031, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763237" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12c5c199c51bd7bf368035b0b1fbda9127c82fee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.md @@ -0,0 +1,599 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CERCUTI'M AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOaMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN twit Y EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRU5TIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E tein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.470, files this Notice of Pro Instructions and Verdict Form. Epstein adopts Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradle . ards' C November 9, 2017, proposed Standard (Civil) Jury Instruc ' ns N 01.3, 202.2, 202.3, 202.4, 301.1, 301.2, 301.3, 301.4, 301.5, 406.1, 406.3, 40 . , 406.9, 601.1, 601.2, 601.5 and 700, which Epstein has not restated here. Eps obj to November 9, 2017, proposed Jury Instructions Nos. 201.1, 201. 2, .4, 406.5, 406.8, 406.12, 503.2 and Adverse Inference, and November 7, and December 1, 2017, Supplemental Instructions. Epstein has provided alternative d additional instructions for the Court's consideration. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Frts2 Primary: Scott®lin ockljiw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(SSi e• Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm B oulevard West Palm 33409 law endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 Wcst Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# 101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will answer truthfully all questions asked of you as prospective jurors [so help you God]? + +r ic S# II PIIIr + +%b..) + +Source. + +Florida Sta Bard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +SSA + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 Qualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire + +Many of you have electronic devices such as cell phones, smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Even though you have not yet been selected as a juror, there are some strict rules that you must follow about electronic devices. + +When you arc called to a courtroom, the judge will give you specific instructions on the use of electronic devices. These rules are so important that the judge may tell you that you must turn off your cell phone or other electronic devices completely or that you cannoa6a,v your cell phone or electronic devices in the courtroom. If someone needs to contact in 1[W of an emergency, the judge will provide you with a phone number where you canes e messages. + +If the trial judge allows you to keep your cell phones, co apt other electronic devices, you cannot use them to take photographs, video recordin or a dio recordings of the proceedings in the courtroom or your fellow jurors. You must ng use to search the Internet or to fmd out anything related to any cases in the courthouse + +Why is this restriction imposed? This restricti the case without distraction and only on the evidence, some of you, these restrictions affect your normal way you are used to communicating and perha because jurors must decide in the courtroom. I know that, for ities and may require a change in the the way you are used to learning. + +If you investigate, research, or m make sure that the information you o opportunity to dispute or challenge by a juror unfairly and imprope system promises. Between now an not discuss any informati and family mem called for jury a jury and ho the case anythi phone or es on your own, the trial judge has no way to oper for the case. The parties likewise have no cy of what you find. Any independent investigation the parties from having that opportunity our judicial n yyou have been discharged from jury duty by the judge, you must allbut your jury service with anyone, including friends, co-workers, You ay tell those who need to know where you are that you have been you are picked for a jury, you may tell people that you have been picked for the case may take. However, you must not give anyone any information about e people involved in the case. You must also warn people not to try to say or write to you about your jury service or the case. This includes face-to-face, puter communications. I want to stress that you must not use electronic devices or computers to talk about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages, including e-mail and text messages, about your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about your jury service or ask for advice on how to decide any case. The judge will tell you when you are released from this instruction. Remember, these rules are designed to guarantee a fair trial. It is important that you understand the rules as well as the + +impact on our system of justice if you fail to follow them. If it is determined that any one of you has violated this rule, and conducted any type of independent research or investigation, it may result in a mistrial. A mistrial would require the case to be tried again at great expense to the parties and the judicial system. The judge may also impose a penalty upon any juror who violates this instruction. All of us are depending on you to follow these rules, so that there will be a fair and lawful resolution of every case. + +Source; + +Florida Stbgdard Jury Instruction (Civil) (not numbered) + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +s A Co + +### 201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire + +Welcome. [I] [The clerk] will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. + +This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a ci trial is a disagreement between people or companies, where the claims of one or more of ies have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +This case has two components. First, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epste Defendant Scott Rothstein for utilizing three cases that Rothstein's fabricate other claims and continue the operation of a Ponzi sche Defendant Plaintiff Je ir air meter d probable cask oto and co alleging that knew or s Ponzi scheme. a claim against gainst Epstein to cond, about whether 1 proceeding against ve known about Rothstein's + +is an attorney. In Augus Somber 2008, while he was a sole practitioner, sled three claims against gpgiltfo alleged sexual misconduct + +In late March 2009, join firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"). At the time he joined RRA, E rds d the title of "partner" and he turned over to Scott Rothstein the three clients who ha claims against Epstein. RRA continued to pursue these clients' claims until the firm t 'n November 2009. + +It was publicly disclose had conducted a fraudulent Po against Epstein were bei non-existent settlements hundreds of millio, ovember 2009 that Rothstein, the senior partner of RRA, eme which, in part, had used the fact that sexual abuse claims rosecuted by MA to induce investors to buy interests in fictitious, al abuse claims against Epstein. Rothstein's scheme raised rs and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. + +In ea er 2009, Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a lawsuit against Rothstein ' clients. Epstein alleged that while was a partner at RRA in 200 es brought against Epstein when was a sole practitioner in 2008, we being used in 2009 to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims ple in those cases, and instead were done to benefit and lure investors into Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. contends that Epstein filed the lawsuit for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate him into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims. Epstein eventually settled the cases with three clients. + +A default was entered against Rothstein because he ailed to respond to Epstein's Complaint Epstein voluntarily withdrew his claims against client in August 2010. Epstein dismissed his claims against in August 2012 without prejudice to his right to reassert them at a later time. The only claim pending is claim against Epstein for malicious prosecution. + +The principal witnesses who may testify in this case are Jeffrey Epstein via video deposition), Scott Rothstein (via video deposition), and Mr. clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe). + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles + +Who are the people here and what do they do? + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and decide how to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that you will need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on the issues of this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plaintiff. A party that ctd • is sled the Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of representing their cl for their client here at the trial. They have taken oaths as attorneys t the rules for their profession. cans they speak eir best and to follow + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Counsel: The atto Link, represents Jeffrey Epstein, who is the person w courthouse. His job is to present his client's side of t • to most of the time as "the Plaintiff' or "the introduce who is sitting at the table with you? side of the courtroom, Scott initial proceeding here at the He and his client will be referred endant." Mr. Link, will you please + +DefendantlCounter-Plainti s C attorney on this side of the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents defendants who has been sued and who brought a counterclaim against Mr. Epstein r o to present his client's side of things to you. He and his client will usually be refe as "the Defendant" or "the Counter-Plaintiff" Mr. Scarola, will you please introd whp s sitting at the table with you? + +Court Clerk: This on sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. [He] [She] is here to assist me with some oft m hanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that4e uced in the course of the trial. + +Co reporter. this tri The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. [His] [Her] job is to maintain order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. Anything you need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should be brought to [him] [her]. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the case. Only I can do that. + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begin to select in a few moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what the facts are and what the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point and have no fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial, there are rules that all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyone, including friends and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on how to decide this case. + +I want to stress that this rule means you must not use electronic devices or computers to communicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, [maps], or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom.\*\* + +*\*\*The trial judge should select one of the following two alternative instructions explaining the rules governing jurors' use of electronic devices, as explained in Note on Use 1.* + +*Alternative A:* [All cell phones, computers, tablets or other types of electronic devices must be turned off while you are in the courtroom. Turned off means that the phone or other electronic device is actually off and not in a silent or vibrating mode. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or of your fellow jurors. After each recess, please double check to make sure your cell phone or electronic device is turned off. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. You cannot have in the jury room any cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +*Alternative B:* [You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +What are the reasons for these rules? These rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make inquiries on your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that the information you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportunity to dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you fmd. That is contrary to our judicial system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and challenge the evidence being considered against it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Any independent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start ov tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the tax these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, suc paying a fine or both. ings, and 'al is a If you violate g time in jail, + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, o these proceedings. That means those communications shall e\* court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing instructed the courtroom personnel that any communi presence must be reported to me, and I will tell communication from you that I believe may be of • part of the record of made in open court with the with the court clerk. I have have with them outside of my and their attorneys about any the parties and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate concerning your comfort and safety, suc to assemble for duty, how you should or jury room, and similar inquiries. ith courtroom personnel about matters arking, location of break areas, how and when personal items can be brought into the courthouse + +If you become aware o any dfation of these instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me b g a note to the bailiff. + +# Source: + +Florida S Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.2 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +# 201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 201.3. + +4s) + +# 101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will well and truly try this case between the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, and a true verdict render according to the law and evidence [so help you God]? + +Source: + +Florida dard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.2 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +tsA Co + +# 202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 202.2. + +A, g + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8** +**202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 202.3. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9** +**202.4 Juror Questions** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 202.4. + +**301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, +Stipulations, and Admissions** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 301.1. By agreeing to the instruction, Epstein does not waive the argument that some of the items should not be permitted to be used in this case. Epstein agrees to the instruction so that, in the event that either the parties agree, or the Court rules, that these types of items will be used, the relevant instruction should proceed the item. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11** +**301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, +or Physical Evidence is Admitted** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 301.2. + +# 301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates IM' Standard Jury Instruction 301.3. + +esA Co + +# 301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates =. 1 Standard Jury Instruction 301.4. Epstein does not waive any objections to any particular demonstrative or visual aids by adopting the proposed instruction, but includes the instruction in case the Court decides, or the parties agree, to permit any such items + +tsA Co + +# 301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 301.5. + +Go + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 301.10 Instruction Before Recess + +We are about to take [our first] [a] recess. Remember that all of the rules I have given you apply even when you are outside the courtroom, such as at recess. + +Remember the basic rule: Do not talk to anyone, including your fellow jurors, friends, family or co-workers about anything having to do with this trial, except to speak to court staff. This means no c-mailing, text messaging, tweeting, blogging, or any other form of co unication. You cannot do any research about the case or look up any information about the c emember to observe during our recess the other rules I gave you. If you become aware ation of any of these rules at all, notify court personnel of the violation. + +After each recess, please double check to make sure [that your c other electronic device is turned off completely] [that you do not bring your cell pho or gther electronic device into the courtroom or jury room]. + +A S' 17.1ir + +'....) + +Source:÷ + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.10 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16** +**406.1 Introduction** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.1. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17** +**406.2 Summary of Claims** + +The claims and defenses in this case are as follows: + +*Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein claims that Defendant Scott Rothstein conspired with other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, for personal greed and enrichment, and engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved, among other things, marketing of non-existent settlements involving claims (both real and fabricated), against Epstein, and engaging in improper litigation tactics in order to promote and sustain that Ponzi scheme. Epstein brought claims for violations of Florida's Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, violations of Florida's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO), abuse of process, fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Rothstein did not defend those claims and, consequently, a default was entered against him. A default is not an actual determination of the merits of the claim. Instead, it is a legal ruling that because the defendant did not contest the claim, the defendant will be deemed to have committed the offense. Consequently, the sole issue for your determination on Epstein's claim against Rothstein is the amount of damages that should be awarded to Epstein against Rothstein for the harm that Rothstein caused to Epstein.* + +*Epstein must prove the amount of damages he suffered by Rothstein's actions by the greater weight of the evidence.* + +*Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, also filed claims (called the "civil proceeding") against Defendant [REDACTED] J. Edwards. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against [REDACTED] before the claims were decided by the Court. Epstein's dismissal of the claims against [REDACTED] was without prejudice to Epstein's right to later reassert them. Therefore, those claims are not before you for your determination.* + +[REDACTED] filed a Counterclaim for malicious prosecution against Epstein which alleged that Epstein maliciously and without probable cause, filed and continued the civil proceeding against him, and that this caused [REDACTED] damage. Epstein denies that claim and also asserts that he is entitled to a verdict in his favor. + +[REDACTED] must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that Epstein caused to be filed or continued the civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause and that Epstein's lawsuit caused [REDACTED] to suffer damage. + +I will now define some of the terms you will use in deciding this case. + +### Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.2 + +Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.500; DG Sports Agency LLC v. First Round Mgmt, LLC, 174 So. 3d 541, 544 (Fla. 4ih DCA 2015) (effect of default); Donohue v. Brightman, 939 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (effect of default); Clerk's Default on January 21, 2010 (D.E. 27) + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn ,O4imic CO . iS 5) + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18** +**406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.3. + +#### Claim Against Rothstein: Damages + +You must consider whether or not to award damages in favor of Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein for the claims that Jeffrey Epstein has raised against Scott Rothstein. + +You should award Jeffrey Epstein an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate him for his loss, injury or damage, including any damage. + +If you find that Jeffrey Epstein has not proven any loss or damage, ySt Jeffrey Epstein nominal damages such as one dollar. I award + +### Source:, + +Abuse of Process: Valdes v. GAB Robi Investments v. Payless Flea Mark damages are sufficient to recov So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); (Nort Star Capital Acquisitions, LLC v. Krig, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (M.D. Fla. 2009), Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Contracts and Business) 504.11 Inc., 924 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); S & I So. 3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Nominal on for abuse of process. See Stoler v. Levinson, 394 + +CO + +Fraud: Prieto v. Smoolc I ., So. 3d 916, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). See also Sena v. Pereira, 179 So. 3d 433, 4 la. 4 DCA 2015). + +Conspiracy: (Fla. 46 c Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Inv. Group, Inc., 79 So. 3d 855, 863 (quoting Raimi v. Furlong, 702 So. 2d 1273, 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). + +Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Acts: Fla. Stat. 772.103, Fla. Stat. § 772.104, Fla. Stat. 772.102 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### Issues on Claim + +I will now instruct you on what must prove to prevail on his claim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +maliciously and without probable cause instituted or continued a civil proceeding against The issues you must decide on claim against Epstein are whether,. which later terminated in favor of and, if so, whether that action was a Iegal cause of damage to + +must prove each of these elements in order to prevail on h'S for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +I will now instruct you further on the individual elements of 's + +iS 4/) 9 + +# Source: + +Second Paragraph: Florida Stan Instruction, but the order first, then explain the ele understand why th v. Mancusi, 632 2015); Hickm ury Instruction 406.8. This paragraph reflects the Standard e instructions has been changed to instruct the jury on the elements the jury. It is Epstein's position this will allow the jury to better be g instructed on probable cause, malice, etc.; Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. 13 2 (Fla. 1994); Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 416 DCA ay's Intl Realty, Inc., 16 So. 3d 154, 155 (Fla. 46 DCA 2009). + +Third P Union Rent-A-C (num Bros Real Estate & Investment Co. v. =, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926); 1. Amsco Division v. 468 So. 2d 349, 353 (Fla. 3nd DCA 1985); Alamo Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1355 (Fla. 1994). + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### Probable Cause + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting and then continuing a civil proceeding against another, the facts and circumstances known to •. ifre ',were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against was supported by existing facts. + +It is burden to stage of the civil proceedlinst of it. You may find that the allegations in the civil proceeding brought by Jeffrey Epstein were u untrue, or if some of the claims would not have been successful. rove that Jeffrey Epstein lacked probable e at every from the filing of his suit t rmination failed to show a lack of probable ca ven some of ' y eic ., shown to be + +The information that Jeffrey Epstein relied on does not have t hand by Jeffrey Epstein, but can be trustworthy information that You may find probable cause existed even if there was proceeding. rmation gained firstded to Jeffrey Epstein. inty of the outcome of the + +You cannot base your finding as to probab has proven that Jeffrey Epstei your findings as to whether there was a lack terminated his civil proceeding against Bra whether or not you believe that malice. Likewise, you cannot base cause on evidence that Jeffrey Epstein + +# Source: + +First Paragraph: Florida S tircl Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.4. + +Second Para show lack of 1172-73 ( did n prosecuti con v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (must le cause for entire case or claim fails); May v. Fundament, 444 So. 2d 1171, A 1984) (same); Moity v. Bodin, 489 So. 2d 474 (La. Ct. App. 1986) (where lack of probable cause for at least several of allegations, then no malicious + +Third Paragraph: ■ **v. Kostroff, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2000) (does not have to be first-hand information); Endacott v. International Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("the defendants need not be certain of the outcome of the underlying proceeding to have probable cause for bringing the counterclaim").** + +**Fourth Paragraph: Bros Real Estate & Investment v. =, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926) cannot infer probable cause based on finding of malice); Central Florida Machinery Co., Inc. v. 424 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) ("a bare showing of malice will not, in turn, permit** an inference of a lack of probable cause"); Applestein v. Preston, 335 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) ("when want of probable cause was not established, the existence thereof could not be inferred from malice, if malice was proved. Although malice may be inferred from want of probable cause, want of probable cause cannot be inferred from malice"); Endacott v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("However, termination of an underlying civil proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff is not sufficient evidence that the defendants lacked probable cause"). + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +iS 5) + +#### Malice + +One acts maliciously in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he or she does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to bring an offender to justice or to establish what he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Epstein acted maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the conduct complained of, including any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the proceeding. + +You are not required, however, to fmd malice because of a lack of institute or continue the proceedings and you should not draw an inference of probable cause if other evidence of the circumstances at the time o different conclusion. ause to ice from a lack uct lead to a + +First Paragraph: Florida Standa6lceu 4Si struction 406.5 + +# Source: + +Second Paragraph: Colo tores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So. 24 1181, 1185 la. 1977) ("It is recognized that mar Inferred from the absence of probable cause. v. Whitfield, 290 So. 2d 49 (F 974); uval Jewelry Co. v. M, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 82.(Ela. 1931). However, mar s egally synonymous with the absence of probable cause. = v. Miami Home Milk Association, 143 Fla. 518, 197 So. 125 (1940). The inference of malice from the probable cause is not one of law but merely a presumption of fact which may be rebu is is an inference which the jury is not required to draw, and which it should not draw if o facts disclosed by the evidence lead to a different conclusion. See Brothers Real Estate & Investment Co. v. EM. 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623 (1926). + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates a Standard Jury Instruction 406.6. + +esA Co + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24 406.7 Legal Cause + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 406.7. + +A, g + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25 Bona Fide Termination + +must prove that the termination la Epstein's civil proceeding against him was a bona fide termination in favor of + +A termination of a civil proceeding is a bona fide termination of the civil proceeding only if it ended in a manner that demonstrated that the proceeding lacked merit. + +You must consider the reasons for the voluntary dismissal by Jeffrey Epstein his claims against as well as all of the circumstances surrounding the vol dismissal of those claims in making this determination. + +#### Source: + +Giving an instruction: Florida Standard Jury Lnstructio question exists concerning whether the prior proc additional instruction on that issue will be nee Systems. Inc., 344 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 19 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). C• 06.8, Notes on Use ("If a fact ated in favor of the claimant, an Shidlowsky v. National Car Rental man v. Crabro Motors, Inc., 199 So. 2d + +First Paragraph: Debrincat v. Fisch prosecution claim); CA Hansen Co 1990) (plaintiff must show eith Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. 2d 68, 70 (Fla. 2017) (element of malicious ker et at, 565 So. 2d 812, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA e decision on the merits or a bona fide termination); So. 2d 1352, 1356 (Fla. 1994). + +CO 'S + +Second Paragraph: Shar E&A, Inc., 135 So. 3d 428, 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 115 I 5 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2008)). + +Third Paragra v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Fla. 4i° DCA 2008) ("whether a voluntary di i q lifies as a `bona fide termination' of the proceedings in the defendant's favor dep the reasons and circumstances underlying the dismissal"); Doss v. Bank of Ameri 857 So. 2d 991, 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("whether a withdrawal or abandonment of a law constitutes a bona fide termination in favor of a person against whom the suit was brought depends on the total circumstances surrounding the withdrawal or abandonment"). + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26** +**406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.9. + +### 406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages + +Iit,t find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for , you should award an amount of mon' that greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate for such damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceeding complained of. + +Go + +Source: + +Florida dard Jury Instructions (Civil) 406.12 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28** +**601.1 Weighing the Evidence** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 601.1. + +### 601.2 Believability of Witnesses + +Epstein hereby adopts and into rates Standard Jury Instruction 601.2. Epstein does not waive any argument that should not be permitted to present any expert testimony by inclusion of this jury instruction, but includes it in the event the Court overrules Epstein's objections + +Go + +### 601.4 Multiple Claims, Numerous Parties, Consolidated Cases + +In your deliberations, you will consider and decide several distinct claims including claims by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and one claim by i l against Jeffrey Epstein. Although these claims have been tried together, each is separate from the others, and each party is entitled to have you separately consider each claim as it affects that party. Therefore, in your deliberations, you should consider the evidence as it relates to each claim separately, as you would had each claim been tried before you separately. + +CO SA + +iS 5) + +Source- + +(c. + +0 + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 601.4 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +#### 601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument) + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 601.5. + +Go + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32 700 Closing Instructions + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 700. + +A g + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 33 JBIFURCATED ISSUEL 503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES' + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +for his conduct in maliciously prosecuting a civil proceeding against claims that punitive damages should be awardecSinst y Epstein nitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convi evi ence that Jeffrey Epstein was flog intentional misconduct or gross negligence, a substantial cause of damage to . Under those circumstances yo your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convin nee does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted t Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Ep actual knowledge of the wron Iness of the conduct and that there was a high pr' at injury or damage to and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally at course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disjg:. or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" is more compelling and persuasive evidence" means the more pe case. the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it e already instructed you, "greater weight of the vincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the + +If you decide that p itive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein, then we will have a separate proceeding in hlEo decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against ffrey pstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensa amages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consi fo wing: + +- re, extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including +- (A) whether the wrongful conduct was motivated solely by unreasonable financial gain; +- (B) whether the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey Epstein; + +&#x27; Punitive damages have been bifurcated from the main trial, so that this instruction should not be given unless it becomes appropriate. + +StSher, at the time of damage, Jeffrey Epstein had a s • •• ific ntent to harm and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein did in fact harm and + +(2) the financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein; and + +However, you may not award an amount that would financially destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +You may in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +Go + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 503.2 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# VERDI T F + +We, the Jury, find: + +# A. Epstein's Claims Against Rothstein + +On Jeffrey Epstein's claims a Epstein prove by the greater weight othstein, what amount of damages did Jeffrey dente that he suffered? + +Cos + +# B. ounterhiaim Against Epstein + +I. comment ey prove that an original civil proceeding was caused to be ued against him by Jeffrey Epstein? + +YES + +NO + +If the Answer to Question 1 is "YES" then proceed to Question 2. If the Answer to Question I is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +2. Did prove that Jeffrey Epstein was the legal cause of the original civil proceeding against + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 2 is "YES" then proceed to Question 3. If the Answer to Question 2 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +3. Did the termination of Jeffrey iti or crivil proceeding c tea bona fide termination of that proceeding in favor of + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 3 is "YES" then proceed to Questi the Answer to Question 3 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed n, t, her. + +4. Did prove by the ght of the evidence that there was no probable cause for Jeffrey Epstein to initiate ue his original civil proceeding against + +YES + +If the Answer to Question 4 is then proceed to Question 5. If the Answer to Question 4 is "NO," then please date atggn the verdict form and proceed no further. + +5. Dill ards prove by the greater wei t of the evidence that Epstein instituted or continued hi al ivil proceeding against maliciously? + ++YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 5 is "YES" then proceed to Question 6. If the Answer to Question 5 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +6. Did prove by the greater weight of the evidence that Epstein's institution or continuation of his original civil proceeding against caused damage to + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 6 is "YES" proceed to Question 7. If the Answer to Question 6 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +7. What amount of damage, if any, did prove, by the weight of the evidence, that he suffered as a result of Epstein's institution or continuatio iho s original civil proceeding against IMP? + +\$ + +8. Did prove that punitive damages ted as punishment to Epstein for instituting or continuing his original civil proceedi • • dwards and as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding without probabl e + +YES + +YOU HAVE REACHED YOUR VE FORM ( S \ ASE SIGN AND DATE THIS VERDICT + +SO SAY WE ALL, this& , 2018. + +FOREPERSON \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca040de2c32d38466944da35a6ee02be2270be1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251/EFTA02763251.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3075 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763251.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 46, + "chars": 44085, + "elapsed_seconds": 16.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CERCUTI'M AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN twit Y EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRU5TIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 326.1221923828125 + ], + [ + 501.81536865234375, + 326.1221923828125 + ], + [ + 501.81536865234375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5620727539062, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5620727539062, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.5447692871094, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.5447692871094, + 95.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 95.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 \nQualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.97998046875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.97998046875, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO.3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5410766601562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5410766601562, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.212, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 427.98199462890625, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 427.98199462890625, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 \n201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.1218872070312, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.1218872070312, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 565.9925079345703 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 565.9925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 65.61 + ], + [ + 529.7467041015625, + 65.61 + ], + [ + 529.7467041015625, + 81.603515625 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 81.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 418.3823547363281, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 418.3823547363281, + 95.18707275390625 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 95.18707275390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.163330078125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.163330078125, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.9247741699219, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.9247741699219, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.444091796875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.444091796875, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 414.19281005859375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 414.19281005859375, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8 202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9 202.4 Juror Questions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, Stipulations, and Admissions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 480.4200000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 480.4200000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11 301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, or Physical Evidence is Admitted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5845947265625, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5845947265625, + 81.603515625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1517639160156, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1517639160156, + 95.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 95.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.35888671875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.35888671875, + 82.10302734375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 82.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 458.9419860839844, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 458.9419860839844, + 95.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 95.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 14", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 81.603515625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4099426269531, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4099426269531, + 95.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 95.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 \n301.10 Instruction Before Recess", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.0075073242188, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.0075073242188, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16 406.1 Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17 406.2 Summary of Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 111.35186004638672, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 111.35186004638672, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18 406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.710205078125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.710205078125, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Claim Against Rothstein: Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 398.82373046875, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 398.82373046875, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 112.28748321533203, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 112.28748321533203, + 399.363037109375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 399.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4075317382812, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4075317382812, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Issues on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 349.09930419921875, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 349.09930419921875, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.61831665039062, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.61831665039062, + 456.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 456.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 21", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.36376953125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.36376953125, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Probable Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.6386413574219, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.6386413574219, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 483.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 483.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.5487670898438, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.5487670898438, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Malice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.283203125, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.283203125, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 442.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 442.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 \n406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.1084594726562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.1084594726562, + 95.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24 \n406.7 Legal Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25 \nBona Fide Termination", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.4931030273438, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.4931030273438, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 318.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 318.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26 406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 27", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.8762817382812, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.8762817382812, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 408.6361083984375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 408.6361083984375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28 601.1 Weighing the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.6317749023438, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.6317749023438, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 Believability of Witnesses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 389.5010986328125, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 389.5010986328125, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 30", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.1527709960938, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.1527709960938, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.4 Multiple Claims, Numerous Parties, Consolidated Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 80.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 468.1551513671875, + 80.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 468.1551513671875, + 95.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 95.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 31", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.8692016601562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.8692016601562, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.42, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 437.9006042480469, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 437.9006042480469, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 93.96000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32 \n700 Closing Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5584716796875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5584716796875, + 95.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 33 \nJBIFURCATED ISSUEL \n503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.7931518554688, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.7931518554688, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 608.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 608.3100000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 109.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 109.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDI T F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 343.863037109375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 343.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Claims Against Rothstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 291.6252746582031, + 383.93999999999994 + ], + [ + 291.6252746582031, + 399.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 399.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. ounterhiaim Against Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 318.30340576171875, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 318.30340576171875, + 523.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 523.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763251" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74c6dc90388b82d941225b832eacb6402254e41f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.md @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR +DEPOSITION OF ██████ KRETSCHMAR TAKEN FEBRUARY 11, 2011 + +Counter-Plaintiff, ██████ J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits his Page and Line Designations for the Deposition of ██████ Kretschmar taken February 11, 2011 as follows: + +1. 1) 72:18-73:25 +2. 2) 74:17-19 +3. 3) 74:23-25 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Kretschmar taken 2.11.11 + +Page 2 of 3 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CLEAR + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Kretschmar taken 2.11.11 +Page 3 of 3 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76870e81325fcd34465c997d0dbc3d22f2f38c22 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297/EFTA02763297.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763297.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2727, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 KRETSCHMAR TAKEN FEBRUARY 11, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 521.424, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 521.424, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 416.34000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 160.38 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763297" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83a7c52374363729c959df522e67c34b6d69f2e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.md @@ -0,0 +1,889 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTIISTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJECTIO COUNTER DESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/COUi EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI FENDANT JEFFREY + +Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, J. Ed s,1t e7 files his Objections and + +Counter Designations to the following depositio ttc' ,,on designated by Jeffrey Epstein for use in the instant case and/or as rebuttal: + +A-CPA ATTORNEY-CLI ILEGE ASSERTION + +BE BEST EVID + +SHK SECOND OWLEDGE + +VS VIOL tp STIPULATION + +LP ATION PRIVILEGE + +~IEE ARSAY + +Ae' OPINION + +R RELEVANCE + +REPETITIOUS + +COMPOUND/NO ANSWER + +S SPECULATION + +1. JM. ,March 23 , 2010 + +| | Response to Objections | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| Designation 5:18-21 6:23-24 | | +| Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | +| 7:2-5 7:17-8:23 | 7:17-8:23 (R) 9:7-9 (R) 9:10-9:24 (10 | +| 9:7-9 9:13-16, 18-24 10:13-25 11:4-7 | 11:4-7 (R) 11:22-25 (R) ) | +| 11:22-25 12:2-3 12:7-12 12:16-23 13:13-20 14:8-19 15:5-18:2 20:16-23 21:1-23:2 | 40 9 4) -23 (R) | +| | \ :1-23:2 (R) | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|-------------|---------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 23:21-24:17 | | 23:21-24:17(R) | | +| 25:16-24 | | | | +| 26:8-27:3 | | | | +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | | 31:10-15 (R) | | +| 31:20-23 | | 31:20-23 (R) | | +| 36:6-16 | | 36:6-16 (R) | | +| 38:18-24 | | 38:18-24 (R) | | +| 43:4-10 | | 43:4-10 (R) | | +| 45:13-25 | | 45:13-25 (R) | | +| | 49:10-15 | | | +| | 49:17-22 | | | +| | 50:1-4 | | | +| | 51:22-52:14 | | | +| 53:4-54:4 | | 53:4-54:4 (R) | | +| 54:9-10 | | 54:9-10 (R) | | +| 54:14-22 | | 54:14-22 (R) | | +| 55:10-21 | | 55:10-21 (R) | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | | 57:7-25 (R) | | +| 58:11-15 | | 58:11-15 (R) | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | | 63:25-64:15(R) | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| | 79:7-79:23 | | | +| | 80:9-16 | | | +| | 80:23-24 | | | +| | 81-16-20 | | | +| | 82:17-83:3 | | | +| | 83:8-22 | | | +| | 88:6-11 | | | + +| 107:11-112:1 | | | | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|--------------------| +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to | +| 112:7-10 | | | | +| 112:12-114:10 | | | | +| 115:6-118:20 | | | | +| 118:23-120:22 | | | | +| | 121:4-23 | | | +| 122:24-123:24 | | | | +| 125:2-5 | | | | +| 125:14-19 | | | | +| 126:1-127:8 | | 126:13-127:8 | | +| 128:7-11 | | | | +| 128:16-129:7 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| | 137:1-7 | | | +| | 137:12-16 | | | +| | 138:1-14 | | | +| | 138:21-139:4 | | | +| | 141:7-9 | | | +| | 141:11-13 | | | +| | 141:15-16 | | | +| | 141:23-142:3 | | | +| | 146:4-16 | | | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | | 156:1-160:2 (R) | | +| 158:4-160:2 | 158:1-3 | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | | 162:21-163:7 (R) | | +| 164:21-166:1 | | 164:21-166:1 (R) | | +| 166:22-167:5 | | 166:22-167:5 (R) | | +| 174:24-175:16 | | 174:24-175:16(R) | | +| 175:22-176:4 | | 175:22-176:4 (R) | | +| 180:5-20 | | 180:5-20 (R) | | +| 182:5-25 | | 182:5-25 (R) | | +| 183:16-184:3 | | 183:16-20 | | +| 185:2-186:17 | | 185:2-186:17(R) | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | | 197:14-198:6(R) | | +| 198:2-6 | | | | +| | 203:19-204:3 | | | +| | 206:20-207:3 | | | +| | 207:8-15 | | | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | | 228:15-229:25(R) | | +| 229:19-24 | | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | + +| 233:13-234:6 | | | +|---------------|--|--------------| +| 234:16-23 | | 234:16-23(R) | +| 235:8-13 | | 235:17-21(R) | +| 235:15 | | | +| 235:17-21 | | | +| 236:8-15 | | 236:8-15 (R) | +| 238:24-239:2 | | | +| 239:18-243:21 | | | +| 245:4-245:22 | | | +| 246:12-247:11 | | | +| 247:18-23 | | | +| 248:22-249:7 | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | +| | | | + +P + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | | 252:1-6 (R) | | +| | 261:1-7 | | | +| | 263:7-264:7 | | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | +| | 280:6-281:13 | | | +| | 282:6-9 | | | +| 283:5-284:2 | | 283:10-17 (R) | | +| | | 283:18-19 (R) | | +| | | 283:20-284:2(R) | | +| 286:12-287:6 | | 286:12-287:6(R) | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +2. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: May 15, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 5:13-14 | | | | +| 5:23-6:2 | | | | +| 6:11-19 | | | | +| | 6:20-24 | | | +| 7:3-20 | | | | +| 7:25-8:7 | | 7:16-20 Repetitious | | +| 9:3-7 | | 9:3-7 Repetitious | | +| 11:8-10 | | | | +| | 11:11-20 | | | +| 11:21-12:3 | | | | +| 12:10-13 | | | | +| | 14:24-15:3 | | | +| | 15:17-16:3 | | | +| 16:4-15 | | | | +| 17:16-18:16 | | | | +| 18:20-19:4 | | | | +| 22:24-23:5 | | | | +| 23:25-24:15 | | | | +| 24:19-25:4 | | | | +| 25:9-12 | | | | +| 25:19-29:1 | | | | + +| 29:11-22 | | 29:19-30:7 | | +|-------------|--|------------------|--| +| | | Compound/NoAns. | | +| 30:2 | | | | +| 30:6 | | | | +| 30:25-31:20 | | 31:16-20 Hearsay | | +| 36:9-37:18 | | | | +| 38:13-22 | | | | +| 41:3-16 | | | | +| 42:5-22 | | | | +| 43:12-17 | | | | +| 44:1-13 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 45:6-17 | | | | +| 46:9-47:2 | | | | +| 47:14-23 | | | | +| | 47:24-48:3 | | | +| 48:4-23 | | | | +| 49:7-19 | | | | +| 55:10-57:8 | | 57:5-6 (R), Hearsay | | +| 57:15-58:5 | | | | +| | 58:6-59:5 | | | +| 60:20-61:16 | | 60:24-61:1 Rule 403 | | +| 62:6-10 | | | | +| 70:24-71:20 | | | | +| 72:11-25 | | 72:20-25 R, A-C | | +| | 74:18-25 | | | +| | 75:8-13 | | | +| 75:14-76:8 | | | | +| | 76:11-21 | | | +| | 76:25-78:9 | | | +| | 79:4-8 | | | +| | 79:13-15 | | | + +**3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------| +| | 113:7-25 | | | +| | 117:9-21 | | | +| | 125:9-11 | | | +| 130:12-25 | | 130:12-25 Colloquy
of Counsel, R, C | | +| 132:25-133:10 | 133:11-13 | | | +| | 134:5-7 | | | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| | 138:12-139:1 | | | +| 139:6-22 | | 139:6-22 R, LP | | +| | 140:24-141:12 | | | +| | 141:23-142:25 | | | +| 143:1-144:9 | | 143:1-20 R, LP | | +| | 144:19-145:16 | | | +| 152:11-153:14 | | 152:11-153:14 R, LP | | +| 205:9-22 | | 205:9-22 R, LP | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | +| | 207:9-208:1 | | | + +| | 208:7-209:13 | | +|--|---------------------|--| +| | 215:18-24 | | +| | 216:11-14 | | + +# 4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010 + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|---------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------| +| Designation 5:23-6:1 8:4-7 | /Cross Designation | Objections | +| 13:9-14:8 19:7-11 19:17-20:1 20:12-13 | | 13:9-14:8 LP, VS,H ,,c1 | +| | | 23:4-23-25 R,LP | +| 23:4-6 | | O NS' | +| 23:8 | | 23:4-23-25 | +| 23:10-19 | | 23:4- ,R,LP | +| 23:24-25 25:6-26:15 | | 23. 5 ,R,LP | +| | | ea , 2nd Hand wledge, VS,LP | +| 28:14-17 | | 8:14-29:14 R, H, | +| | (S\ ") | LP, VS | + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Designation | /Cross Designation | Objections | +| 28:19-29:14 | | 28:19-29:14 R, II, LP, VS | +| 29:22-31:7 31:15-18 31:20-32:1 32:3-11 | | 29:22-30:18 H,LP, VS 31:1-32:11 R,H,LP VS, SHK, BE R,H,LP,VS,SHK, Aik BE R,H,LP, VS, SHK BE R,H,LP,VS, SHICOAS BE | +| 32:25-33:12 33:14-21 | | 32:25-33:12 SH BE,LP | +| 34:3-35:3 36:10-37:3 37:8-39:2 39:5-20 43:2-3 | .\' | 31.11 , SHK 7.18-38:25 LP.H | +| 43:25-44 :3 46:16-20 46:22 47:3-6 | AiLS | | +| 47:8-11 47:18-21 | C.)<°:- | | +| 48:4-8 117 | 441v | | +| 48:13-1& | | 48:13-49:1R,H, LP | +| 48: CI) | | R,H,LP, SHK SHK | +| - 1 | | 49:13-50:4 R,H,LP SHK | +| 4 :24-51:4 | | 50:5-51:4 R,H,LP SHK | +| 51:15-17 | | 51:15-52:17 H,LP, A-C, PA, SHK | +| 51:20-52:17 | | H,LP,A-C,PA,SHK | +| 53:8-11 | | 53:8-24 H,SHK, LP,A-C, PA | +| 53:13-24 54:11-55:1 | | H,SHK,LP,A-C,PA | + +| 55:5-22 | | | | +|------------|--|--|--| +| 57:2-10 | | | | +| 57:15-25 | | | | +| 59:11-60:5 | | | | +| 60:18-20 | | | | +| 60:22-24 | | | | + +5. **Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 17:2-5 | | | | +| 17:12-14 | | | | +| 17:16-25 | | | | +| 19:16-20:8 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 20:23–21:5 | | | | + +- 6. Scott Rothstein; December 12,2011 (Razorback FundinE v. Rothstein. 1Th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-0629431 + +| Completeness/Counter | R ponse to | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------| +| /Cross Designation | Objections | +| Designation | O 'ections | +| 58:8-17 58:21-60:18 | 58:8-62:6 H,R,LP s | +| 60:20-62:20 | 61:15-61:25 pile C 62:1-611Z,NO)• | + +- 7. Scott Rothstein; June 14. 2012 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------| +| 68:24-69:8 | | 68:24-69:8 R | | +| 69:21-22 | | 69:21-22 R | | +| 69:24 | | 69:24 R | | +| 70:17-71:22 | | 70:17-70:20 R | | +| | | 71:5-71:22 R, LP | | +| 76:8-77:20 | | 76:8-77:20 R, LP | | +| 79:10-24 | | 79:10-24 R, LP | | +| 80:12-23 | | 80:12-23 O,S,R,LP | | +| 83:2-16 | | 83:2-16 R, LP | | +| 85:18-23 | | 85:18-23 R | | +| 86:4-89:10 | | 86:4-89:10 R, LP | | +| 92:4-93:14 | | | | +| 94:3-15 | | 94:3-94:15 R | | +| 95:1-20 | | 95:1-95:4 R | | +| 98:21-99:22 | | 98:21-99:22 R | | +| 104:4-12 | | 104:4-104:12 R | | +| 105:7-107:11 | 107:9-11 | 105:7-105:25 R | | +| | 109:15-19 | | | +| 110:12-19 | | | | +| 110:21-111:12 | | 110:21-111:12 R | | +| 112:3-12 | | 112:3-12 | | +| | 114:9-15 | | | +| 115:10-116:19 | | 115:10-116:19 R LP | | +| | 116:9-10 | | | +| | 116:12-13 | | | +| | 116:24-25 | | | +| | 117:1-2 | | | +| | 117:5-6 | | | +| | 117:12-13 | | | +| 117:14-118:2 | 117:25-118:2 | 117:14-118:2 R LPH | | +| 118:14-120:4 | | 118:14-120:4 R LP | | +| | 121:4-122:15 | | | +| | 122:23-124:7 | | | + +8. [REDACTED] S. Adler; April 20, 2011\* + +\* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] OBJECTS TO USE OF THE ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY. ALL IRRELEVANT AS POST-FILING INFORMATION THAT CANNOT SUPPORT P.C. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS ARE SEPARATELY NOTED. + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:14-5:12 | 4:8-11 | | | + +| 11:11-23 | | | | +|-------------|--|-------------------|--| +| 12:16-14:14 | | | | +| 14:20-18:6 | | 17:15-18:5 C | | +| 18:20-20:1 | | | | +| 23:4-25:7 | | 23:16-24:11 R 403 | | +| | | 25:2-25:7 403 | | +| 25:21-27:10 | | 25:21-26:8 403 | | +| | | 26:21-22 403 | | +| 27:14-21 | | | | +| 30:10-32:17 | | | | +| 32:24-33:4 | | 32:24-33:1 NoAns. | | +| | | 33:2-4 C | | +| 35:9-17 | | 35:9-17 403 | | +| 38:18-41:18 | | | | +| 42:13-43:22 | | 42:13-43:22 R | | +| 44:1-47:8 | | 44:1-44:19 R | | +| | | 45:11-46:16 R | | +| 53:15-56:21 | | 53:15-56:21 R | | +| 57:5-58:14 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------|------------------------| +| 63:10-25 | | | | +| | 65:15-66:6 | | | +| | 66:11-20 | | | +| | 72:13-73:1 | | | +| 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| 77:21-78:4 | | | | +| 78:6-17 | | | | +| 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| 96:1-8 | | | | +| 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| 101:19-102:7 | | 101:19-102:7 403 | | +| 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| 106:4-23 | | 106:4-107:4 R | | +| 106:25-107:4 | | | | +| 107:15-23 | | 107:15-23 R | | +| 108:1-5 | | 108:1-3 R | | +| | | 108:4-5 R, 403 | | +| 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| 124:20-126:14 | | | | +| | 151:22-152:22 | | | + +9. October 28.2010 (In re Rothstein Rosa:fel& Adler. P.A., U.S.D.C. Case 2 2-BKC-RBR)\* + +\*EDW CTS TO THE USE OF THIS ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY ALSO ONY GIVEN ON 10/28/10 IS IRRELEVANT TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR SUIT FIL ON 12/7/09. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS NOTED. + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|-----------------------|----------------------|------------------------| +| Designation | /Cross Designation | Objections | +| 4:1-5:10 | | 4:23-5:12 R | +| 9:5-12:14 | | 9:5-12:14 R | +| 16:22-20:12 | | 16:22-20:12 R | +| 22:9-24:22 25:3-26:20 | | 22:9-26:20 R | +| 39:9-51:5 | | 39:9-41:10 R | + +| | | 88:9-88:22 R | | +|---------------|--|----------------|--| +| | | 88:23-24 R | | +| 100:18-105:22 | | 100:18-106:3 R | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 105:25-106:3 | | | | +| 107:1-108:18 | | 107:1-108:18 R | | +| 111:6-121:18 | | 111:6-121:18 R | | +| 124:7-18 | | 124:7-124:18 R | | +| 124:23-127:19 | | 124:23-127:19 R | | +| 129:4-12 | | | | +| 131:5-134:25 | | | | +| 144:4-152:20 | | 144:4-152:20 R | | +| 154:4-155:17 | | 154:4-155:17 R | | +| 158:19-159:18 | | 158:19-159:18 R | | +| 161:22-164:14 | | 161:22-164:14 R | | +| 167:13-168:7 | | 167:13-168:7 H | | +| | | SHK | | +| 169:6-170:2 | | 169:6-170:2 H R | | +| | | SHK | | +| 174:21-175:17 | | 174:20-175:17 H | | +| | | SHK, R | | +| 179:23-188:14 | | 179:23-188:14 R | | +| 198:4-199:7 | | 198:4-199:7 R | | + +10. [REDACTED] Kretschmar; February 11, 2011: Entire transcript + +[REDACTED] J. EDWARDS OBJECTS TO USE OF THE ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY. ALSO ALL TESTIMONY IS IRRELEVANT SINCE INFORMATION GATHERED ON 2.11.11 COULD NOT POSSIBLY ESTABLISH P.C. FOR ACTION FILED ON 12.7.09. + +11. Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011 + +[REDACTED] TESTIMONY IS IRRELEVANT SINCE INFORMATION GATHERED ON 3.11.11 COULD NOT POSSIBLY CONTRIBUTE TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR AN ACTION FILED ON 12.7.09 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:10-11 | | | | +| | 4:12, 4:14-15 | | | +| | 4:19-24 | | | +| | 5:6-5:12 | | | +| | 5:19-5:21 | | | +| 9:21-22 | 9:21-22 | | | +| 11:2-9 | | | | + +| 11:22-12:17 | 11:24-12:17 | | | +|-------------|-------------|------------|--| +| 13:7-14:1 | 13:7-14:1 | | | +| 14:22-15:5 | | | | +| 15:16-19:2 | 15:22-17:10 | | | +| | 17:20-19:2 | | | +| 19:21-24:15 | 19:21-21:8 | | | +| | 22:6-22:15 | | | +| | 23:9-24:18 | | | +| 25:6-26:7 | | | | +| | 26:18-25 | | | +| 27:11-28:25 | 27:17-30:3 | | | +| 29:7-20 | | | | +| 30:10-31:9 | 30:10-23 | | | +| | 31:2-32:2 | | | +| | 32:17-33:2 | | | +| | 34:10-13 | | | +| | 34:18-21 | | | +| | 34:24-35:6 | | | +| | 38:17-39:1 | | | +| | 41:21-44:5 | | | +| | 44:19-45:2 | | | +| | 45:5-6 | | | +| | 45:13-16 | | | +| | 45:19-46:4 | | | +| 45:22-46:4 | | | | +| 46:24-47:10 | 46:24-47:7 | | | +| 47:14-51:1 | | 48:22-25 O | | +| | 49:1-50:13 | | | +| 51:4 | | | | +| 51:6-17 | | | | +| 52:1-53:22 | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 53:24-54:6 | | | | +| 65:18-66:2 | 65:18-66:2 | | | +| 67:16-23 | | | | +| | 120:2-8 | | | +| | 120-21-24 | | | +| | 121:1-5 | | | +| | 132:20-21 | | | +| | 133:25-134:20 | | | + +12. Abraxas ██████████ Discala; May 25, 2011 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-21 | | | | +| 7:13-19 | | | | +| 7:25-8:10 | | | | +| 8:20-9:5 | | | | +| 10:9-18 | | | | +| 10:22-11:6 | | | | +| 28:5-14 | | | | +| 28:17-20 | | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | | +| 30:5-25 | | | | +| 45:13-22 | | | | +| 47:13-22 | | | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | | | +| 88:22-89:1 | | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | | +| 90:8-23 | | | | +| 91:7-11 | | | | +| 91:14-92:16 | | | | +| 93:17-18 | | | | +| 93:21-94:6 | | | | +| 95:1-17 | | | | +| 99:25-100:11 | | | | +| 101:5-11 | | | | +| 103:10-14 | | | | +| 107:7-108:3 | | | | +| 108:21-23 | | | | +| 116:19-117:10 | | | | +| 117:13 | | | | +| 117:15-118:12 | | | | +| 119:10-15 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 130:25-131:13 | | | | +| 132:13-25 | | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | | | | +| 136:6-12 | | | | +| 141:7-19 | | | | +| 141:21-23 | | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | | | | +| 152:4-10 | | | | +| 152:18-20 | | | | +| 152:22-153:5 | | | | +| 154:4-14 | | | | +| 155:12-25 | | | | +| 156:7-21 | | | | +| 158:17-159:24 | | | | +| 160:3-8 | | | | +| 160:13-161:5 | | | | +| 161:10-11 | | | | +| 176:8-22 | | | | +| 179:5-11 | | | | +| 180:22-182:2 | | | | +| 184:2-11 | | | | +| 184:19-185:11 | | | | +| 185:16-22 | | | | +| 186:5-187:14 | | | | +| 187:16-189:15 | | | | +| 191:6-192:13 | | | | +| 195:7-196:11 | | | | +| 199:24-200:3 | | | | +| 200:5-12 | | | | +| 200:19-21 | | | | +| 200:23-201:16 | | | | +| 203:16-21 | | | | +| 204:3-7 | | | | +| 205:8-10 | | | | +| 205:12-206:2 | | | | +| 206:4-11 | | | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | | +| 208:7-13 | | | | +| 208:16-18 | | | | +| 212-9-213:22 | | | | +| 214:24-25 | | | | +| 215:6-9 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 246:7-247:22 | | | | +| 248:7-249:7 | | | | +| 252:10-253:10 | | | | +| 254:6-12 | | | | +| 254:19-256:4 | | | | +| 258:16-259:25 | | | | +| 260:7-12 | | | | +| 260:24-261:13 | | | | +| 275:14-276:20 | | | | +| 277:2-6 | | | | +| 277:16-21 | | | | +| 281:19-283:3 | | | | +| 283:10-284:9 | | | | +| 284:15-25 | | | | +| 285:21-23 | | | | +| 286:4-10 | | | | +| 286:14-18 | | | | +| 286:20-21 | | | | +| 290:4-13 | | | | +| 356:2-18 | | | | +| 356:23-357:7 | | | | +| 357:16-358:11 | | | | +| 358:15-16 | | | | +| 365:20-366:6 | | | | +| 366:8-22 | | | | + +13. [REDACTED] : October 12, 2017 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-11:22 | | | | +| 14:10-18 | | | | +| 14:21-15:12 | | | | +| 15:15-16:2 | | | | +| 16:7-10 | | | | +| 16:14-18 | | | | +| 17:18-19:16 | | | | +| 20:22-25:17 | | | | +| 26:24-28:8 | | | | +| 28:11-29:4 | | | | +| 34:2-16 | | | | +| 34:18-35:6 | | | | +| 45:3-47:19 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------| +| 47:23-49:21 | | | | +| 51:13-21 | | | | +| 53:14-54:15 | | | | +| 54:17-56:8 | | | | +| 56:21-57:3 | | | | +| 57:9-13 | | | | +| 57:15-58:9 | | | | +| 86:8-22 | | | | +| 91:14-92:10 | | | | +| 108:21-109:2 | | | | +| 116:16-22 | | | | +| 117:7-118:7 | | | | +| 120:6-23 | | | | +| 121:6-122:23 | | | | +| 123:8-124:23 | | | | + +J. ██████████ expressly reserves the right to amend or supplement these objections to designations, including any additional depositions taken in this or other related matters. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm + +Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +## COUNSEL LIST + +█████ J. █████ Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for █████ J. █████ + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f75851c6a44b830db72d83d18ee3b7ff2c04219 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300/EFTA02763300.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,965 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763300.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 26, + "chars": 68563, + "elapsed_seconds": 233.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJECTIO COUNTER \nDESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/COUi\nEPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI \nFENDANT JEFFREY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 287.54999999999995 + ], + [ + 520.5844116210938, + 287.54999999999995 + ], + [ + 520.5844116210938, + 324.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 324.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Bradley J. Edwards; October 10, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 304.776, + 434.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 434.15999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 276.3262023925781, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 276.3262023925781, + 147.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 147.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 283.356, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 283.356, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 191.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "10. [REDACTED] Kretschmar; February 11, 2011: Entire transcript", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 422.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "11. Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 291.312, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 291.312, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 528.9300000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12. Abraxas \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 Discala; May 25, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 261.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 76.94999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763300" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0e1b13daf3eae8a79a315e7983ff60e2cbb28c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## ORDER ON MOTION TO PEL PAYMENT OF DEPOSITION EXPENSES + +04 + +THIS CAUSE having come to be, considered upon MOTION TO COMPEL PAYMENT OF DEPOSITION EXPENSES, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: + +Th-l akiAntA-1 AAJ AtoniriaA)A, 014/ 50 FOR .61:57, 6r DEPosyrectwv Ex Moses' of is ex raiz r, DR..crahsa.), + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this /4 + +day of , 2017. + +ALD HAFELE CIR UIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +██████████ Jadv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. ██████████ Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAC Order on Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +CO SA iS 4)9 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e2f66ad162719b6220f542d11ea0cb1cfcd4376 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326/EFTA02763326.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763326.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2492, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO PEL \nPAYMENT OF DEPOSITION EXPENSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.2830505371094, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 415.2830505371094, + 382.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 382.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 172.53 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763326" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0412fbaaf7b3be30907f4547c0ce021651e812b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +sum ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +### AS ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Dyfen e Fourth Amended Counterclaim, and the Court, having reviewed the file, consi cAd tri rguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERE ADJUDGED that the motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record and su marized as follows: + +- 1. The proposed Fifth Affirmative Defense is inapplicable to a claim for malicious prosecution. The Noerr-Pennington doctrine relied upon by Counter-Defendant Epstein is inapplicable to this case. Leave to amend to add the proposed Fifth Affirmative Defense is therefore denied on grounds of futility. +- 2. The proposed Sixth Affirmative Defense is inapplicable based upon the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974). Leave + +to amend to add the proposed Sixth Affirmative Defense is therefore denied on grounds of futility. + +- 3. The proposed Seventh Affirmative Defense is also inapplicable based upon the United States Supreme Court's decision in Geri: v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974). Furthermore, the proposed Seventh Affirmative Defense is not an affirmative defense, as it does not constitute a confession and avoidance as required by Florida law. Leave to amend to add the proposed Seventh Affir tp sii (t e efcnse is therefore denied on grounds of futility. +- 4. The proposed Eighth Affirmative i ot an affirmative defense, as it does not constitute a confession and avottiance required by Florida law. To the extent it was a legally sufficient affirmative defense, it concerns defamation and not malicious prosecution. Leave M amend to add the proposed Eighth Affirmative Defense is therefore denied on grounds of futility. +- 5. The proposed Ninth Affirmative Defense is not an affirmative defense, as it does not constitute a confession and avoidance as required by Florida law. Leave to amend to add the proposed Ninth Affirmative Defense is therefore denied on grounds of futility. The Court further notes that where punitive damages are sought, due process of law is guaranteed through existing Florida law on that issue. + +#### Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth Amended Counterclaim Epstein v. Rothstein, and L.M. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG + +6. + +day of , 2077. + +D NE AND ORDERED at We Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this/9 + +THE HONO CIRCUIT C D W. HAFELE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +#### Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth Amended Counterclaim Epstein v. Rothstein, and L.M. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola dvitale@searcylaw.com; David P. Vitale Jr. jsx@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA O 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Phone: (561) 686-6300 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 C N Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) + +4OAlk + +J. Esquire staftefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)424-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +HS S) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, Pit 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +#### Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth Amended Counterclaim Epstein v. Rothstein,M. and L.M. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (560-727-3601 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com /49 vvv + +iS ) + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bfaeb059c8d052220cbf6bb0cdb26569c70b9e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329/EFTA02763329.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763329.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4774, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.3299865722656, + 79.78887939453125 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 79.78887939453125 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 311.3299865722656, + 121.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS )\nORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND \nANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FOURTH AMENDED \nCOUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.43000030517578, + 329.21234130859375 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 329.21234130859375 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 378.79351806640625 + ], + [ + 79.43000030517578, + 378.79351806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth \nAmended Counterclaim \nEpstein v. Rothstein, and L.M. \nCase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth \nAmended Counterclaim \nEpstein v. Rothstein, and L.M. \nCase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 536.8950805664062, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 536.8950805664062, + 129.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 129.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 351.4140319824219, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 351.4140319824219, + 182.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 182.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Fourth \nAmended Counterclaim \nEpstein v. Rothstein,M. and L.M. \nCase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 128.587646484375 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 128.587646484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763329" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7afd9e7585ef096f18071e5f15af15ab3af60e55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.md @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED ON DUCES TECUM + +Co SA + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that rev, January 12 2018, at 9:00 a.m. at the Law Offices of Pottinger LLC, 4 N. ws Avenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268, PlaintiffiCounter-Def y Epstein will take the videotaped deposition by C oral examination for purposes disco and for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of: + +EARLEEN COTE + +The video ( c hit de sition will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer autho • ms • • ter oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a perso s neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who i either a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +The witness shall produce by January S. 2018, those documents identified in the Subpoena Duces Tecum attached. + +Court reporting services shall be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Hwy., Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorne ed on the Service List below on December 20, 2017, through the Court's e-filing porta nt o Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes oul ard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach Alt 401 (561) 727-3600. 27-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/Sc + +ScptPJ. li7(FBN 602991) Rockenbach (FBN 44903) . Many (FBN 26680) : Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com mary: Kara@)linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angelaelinlcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XVOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Earleen Cote Kubicki Draper One East Broward Blvd., Sui Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301,, + +cos + +YOU ARE COMMANDE9)to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions on Friday, January 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. at the Law Offices of Pottinger LLC, 425 N. AndrewsAvenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268, for the taking of your videotaped.deposition in this action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +You are further directed to produce to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's counsel by January 5 2018, the documents identified in the attached Exhibit "A." + +Dated: December 20, 2017. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to respond to this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600, at least seven days before your scheduled appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. + +Copies provided to: + +SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +mep@searcylaw.com +jsx@searcylaw.com +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +\_\_\_\_\_ J. \_\_\_\_\_ + +Nichole J. Segal +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +\_\_\_\_\_ J. \_\_\_\_\_ + +|

J. [REDACTED]
S. Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +#### EXHIBIT A + +#### DEFINITIONS + +1. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, • discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if fully set forth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +> a. All writte r or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited to: all transmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, "\rks, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and intmoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, 131u-ray discs, UltraViolet dispsq ass to tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pi et v ce messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, chang , amen ,ments, drafts and I all non-identical copies of the foregoin +- c. Electronically stored information, records or representations of any c, mechanical and electrical including, but not limited to: all electronic communications, text messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, network logs, Internet history; document files, spreadsheet files, presentation files, database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, obi code files, executable files, data files, script files, project nt files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data es, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "ESP; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document"). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or not the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "CommunicatCd"Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format o application in which such ES! was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein means any n ml person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body, intreau, board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an emit}; shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the present ami former directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf o he irection of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +5. The terms "you" or "your" mean Earleen Cote and include all employees, staff, representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other person acting under her control or on her behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. "Lawsuit" means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., EN. or any other clients represented by J. against Jeffrey Epstein from 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer t CITT Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. + +10. Where appropriate: + +- a. use of the singular includes the lural, and vice versa; +- b. the past tense includes the present tense; +- c. the words "and" and "or" are both conjunctive and disjunctive; +- d. the words "all" and "any" mean "any and all"; +- e. the word "including" means "including without limitation"; and +- f. use of the masculine includes the feminine, and vice versa. + +## INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +1. I In response to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all information, and documents which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in your possession, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically stated in each request, the relevant time period shall be from the date J. applied to Kubicki Draper for employment to the present. + +# EST instructions + +3. ESI Production Format. ESI shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ESI document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +4. Production Media The production of ESI as described herein shall be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). The Production Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity (b)4jle date of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. Ifyou.,otjten that any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1 entify such ESI document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis f4 lining to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on access, a ikely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, thirwthod used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in which the ESI document is + +6. TI duction. ESI produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each pr ion f TIFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load Filni(2) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted text file shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each corresponding TIFF image file; (6) the extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Control List File ("IBM (7) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT'), which shall provide the beginning and ending endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and (8) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load file ("Data Load File" or "DAT') that contains both the.hash value Ar L and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF • ge Ies were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIF les: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Fo at filet at is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shallU intained so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded Ie . not be extracted as separate documents; (3) author cornm cbc(sh;11 remain or be made visible; (4) hidden AN columns, cells, rows, worksheets and other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) presenter notes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent EST in' a foreign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be unicode-compliant. +- b. Doctunent Unitization. If a Native Format file that is converted to, TIFF 'ormat is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments +0 or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + - c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request for a file to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File Format is Impracticable. In the event that production of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Microsoft spreadsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet dat produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, rows end wor sheets and other information unhidden and expanded. +- 1. Right to Request Native Format, reserve the right to demand production in Native Format file. any le produced by you as a TIFF image + +# REQUESTED DOCUMENTS + +- 1. Kubicki Draper's employment and personnel files for J. MM including, but not limited to, applications for employment, lettersille err tc ground checks, employment contracts, agreements, promissory notes, evaluations, reviews, summaries, notes, and communication (recognizing HIPAA laws, this request does not seek personal medical records). +- 2. Your current curriculum vitae. +- 3. Any reports prepared by you or at your direction, relating to your services or participation in thisLawsuit. +- 4. Copies of any notes made by you, or provided to you, relating to your opinions or conclusions in this Lawsuit, whether you relied on those notes or not. +- 5. Communications between you and any person relating to your analysis, opinions or conclusions in this Lawsuit. +- 6. Any photographs or videos taken by you, or provided to you, that you have observed and reviewed in relation to this Lawsuit. + +- 7. Any deposition or hearing transcripts provided to you, or parts of deposition transcripts or any other statements or written materials provided to you, which you have examined or will examine in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 8. Any diagrams or drawings made by you or provided to you, which you have examined in relation to this Lawsuit. +- 9. Any statements or affidavits taken by you, at your direction, or provided to you for your review concerning any of the facts which are involved in this Lawsuit. +- 10. Any memoranda or written notice made by you, or provided to you, concerning the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 11. Any documents prepared by you, provided to you, or obtained by you or reviewed by you, whether intended for your use or not, and regardless of whether or not you actually reviewed or relied on those documents, in connection with this lawsuit. +- 12. All literature and/or documents that you considered releyant to your assignment in this Lawsuit and which you considered in the development of your opinions or conclusions concerning the subject matter of the lawsuit. +- 13. All documents prepared by you to illustrate or demonstrate any fact or opinion considered relevant to this Lawsuit and/or to your assignment, investigation, or opinions. +- 14. Copies of any articles, books, paperd or other publications prepared by you which relate to facts similar to the facts surrounding the subject matter of this Lawsuit. +- 15. Any and all materials considered, consulted, and used by you as a basis or predicate for your opinions and conclusions in this Lawsuit, including, but not limited to, published reports by any private or government agency, textbooks, articles, data or documents furnished by the party' engaging your services, or government or industry standards or regulations. +- 16. Any and all models or demonstrative tools upon which you have or plan to rely, in the formulation and expression of your opinions and conclusions concerning the subject matter atlas Lawsuit. +- 17. A sco of any retainer agreement or other agreement between you and James (or counsel for James that sets forth the terms of your engagement in this matter, mc u ng, but not limited to, the fees for your services in this Matter. +- 18. A copy of all statements, bills, invoices, check stubs or any other document that reflects payment or compensation, or a request for payment or compensation, for your services in this Lawsuit. +- 19. All marketing materials that market or advertise your expert witness services. + +- 20. A list of all other expert witness services for names or any clients represented by names in the last ten years. +- 21. A list of other depositions or trials in which you have testified from January 1, 2008 to the present. +- 22. All expert reports, testimony, videos and affidavits in which you have testified as an expert on any issue in the last ten years. +- 23. Copies of all publications, expert reports, depositions or other documents. in which you have discussed, analyzed or otherwise referenced the subject of the sco f discovery in litigation. +- 24. Your file regarding your opinions, possible opinions, expert te and/or consultation relating directly or indirectly to the issues in this Lawsuit. +- 25. All complaints filed against you with the Florida &was 11 as all communications to you by the Florida Bar and all documents relating teany disciplinary proceedings or investigations conducted by the Florida Bar, < o any committee of the Florida Bar. + +,SP \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5726df24ec7873275949be9178bba7138fd433a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334/EFTA02763334.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,834 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763334.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 27172, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED \nON DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 491.6103820800781, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 491.6103820800781, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.2594604492188, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.2594604492188, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 478.49908447265625, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 478.49908447265625, + 354.363037109375 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 354.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 559.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 337.4447937011719, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 337.4447937011719, + 93.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 93.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 346.03717041015625, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 346.03717041015625, + 120.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 120.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 352.3561706542969, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 352.3561706542969, + 495.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 495.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 355.3641357421875, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 355.3641357421875, + 523.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 523.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EST instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.2498474121094, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.2498474121094, + 95.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 95.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 409.86 + ], + [ + 411.5963134765625, + 409.86 + ], + [ + 411.5963134765625, + 427.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 427.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763334" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b30fae86807cf55751516f41fc787ff2c7f85604 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.md @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff; + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## NOTICE OF FILING PA J1 DI DESIGNATIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF ABRAXAS DISCALA TAKEN MAY 25, 2011 7 + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. y and through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits his Page and Line Desi ~op r the Deposition of Abraxas= DiScala taken May 25, 2011 as follows: + +- 1) 28:5-28 ICZ lir +- 2) 28. +- 3) 30:5-30:25 +- 4) 87:22-88:13 +- 5) 88:22-89:2 +- 6) 89:14-89:17 +- 7) 90:8-90:23 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Abraxas [REDACTED] DiScala taken 5.25.11 + +Page 2 of 6 + +8) 91:21-92:11 + +9) 93:21-94:2 + +10) 99:24-100:6 + +11) 101:5-101:11 + +12) 103:10-103:14 + +13) 107:7-108:3 + +14) 116:11-116:13 + +15) 116:15 + +16) 127:6-128:12 + +17) 128:24-129:11 + +18) 134:20-135:2 + +19) 136:6-136:12 + +20) 141:7-141:16 + +21) 142:11-142:13 + +22) 150:21-151:8 + +23) 152:18-153:5 + +24) 153:11-154:14 + +25) 155:12-155:25 + +26) 156:7-156:16 + +27) 158:11-159:11 + +28) 160:24-161:5 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of AbraxaMIL DiScala taken 5.25.11 Page 3 of 6 + +29) 161:10-161:11 + +30) 161:17-161:22 + +31) 180:22-182:2 + +32) 184:2-184:11 + +33) 184:19-185:11 + +34) 206:10-206:11 + +35) 206:13 + +36) 206:20-207:6 + +37) 207:17-207:24 + +38) 213:2-213:16 + +39) 271:2-271:15 + +40) 285:21-285:23 + +41)285:25-286:2 Ca) + +42) 286:4-286:11 1 P\* + +43) 286:x=3 86 8 + +44) 286'i20-287:7 + +45) 287:24-288:2 + +46) 288:4-288:7 + +47) 288:17-288:18 + +48) 290:4-290:16 + +49) 290:21-290:23 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Abraxas [REDACTED] DiScala taken 5.25.11 + +Page 4 of 6 + +50) 308:19-309:4 + +51) 326:21-326:25 + +52) 327:15-328:3 + +53) 328:11-328:18 + +54) 329:15-330:9 + +55) 330:16-331:3 + +56) 331:10-332:4 + +57) 332:10-332:22 + +58) 333:2-333:5 + +59) 333:9-333:20 + +60) 340:12-340:18 + +61) 345:19-345:23 + +62) 368:22-368:24 + +63) 369:3-369:23 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Abraxas [REDACTED] DiScala taken 5.25.11 + +Page 5 of 6 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2017 day of December, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmecann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page and Line Designations for Deposition of Abraxas J. [REDACTED] DiScala taken 5.25.11 + +Page 6 of 6 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0047c27ca950657615b2d6298c104fe30b0048c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349/EFTA02763349.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763349.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 4238, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 111.72308349609375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 111.72308349609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PA J1 DI DESIGNATIONS FOR \nDEPOSITION OF ABRAXAS DISCALA TAKEN MAY 25, 2011 \n7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 494.0045471191406, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 494.0045471191406, + 417.814697265625 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 417.814697265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 157.14000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763349" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c65cdee2b69d22c15fa445bc388272b930c090 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XMCGMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +(Date Cleared With Counsel for Def unter-Plaintiff + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that P the following hearing at the time sta Court at the Palm Beach Coun Palm Beach, Florida 33401: -Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up ore the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +MOTION: Pla Exp Witness unter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose + +DATA NVednesday, January 17, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +A + +Goes + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or snore of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on December 21, 2017, through the Co Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). attorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +O S + +LINK a ACH, PA 155 B ch Lalces Boulevard, Suite 301 Allis ? 1 each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +rk /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tanuny Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeap ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c talent° para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de hoi tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama d de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 1 e dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunale u1mediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo an d ta comparecencia que se ha voz, 'lame al 711." 4, . programado es menos de 7 dias; si ust e\ e &capacitation del oido o de la + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44489744cd87aaf393038628adb7a244468203b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355/EFTA02763355.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763355.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8043, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763355" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a3b70bb5ed40c2ab59774aacf12b3733e18bde4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.md @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE OF OBJECTION + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, objects to the Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum of Earleen Cote and in support thereof states: + +1. To the extent that Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum purports to require Earleen Cote to produce documents prior to January 12, 2018, the Notice constitutes a notice of production to non-party to which [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] objects. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26th day of December, 2017. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] § adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Objection +Page 2 of 3 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] §, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Objection +Page 3 of 3 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Earleen Cote, Esq. +ehc@kubickidraper.com +Kubicki Draper, P.A. +1 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..306228cb347650840622d8666b938b27cd7866e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359/EFTA02763359.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763359.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2853, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.08, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF OBJECTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 304.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763359" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a5ae792b051e5cc8a70245ff9ddfb8708928100 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15"i JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVJAION"in + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 + +FINAL ORDER OrStISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO L.M. ONLY + +THIS CAUSE having come on by the parti S < ' 'Li, and the Court having reviewed the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice(, S 8Syl e , dant, L.M., individually only, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, ere + +P + +he above-styled cause is hereby dismissed with wally only and each party to this Stipulation shall bear ORDERED AND ADJUD prejudice as to Defendant, L.M. their own attorney's fees a rEs. + +day of ()fit DONE AND ORD RED at West Palm Beach Palm Beach County, Florida this '7 -- 2010. + +> David Circuit Judge + +Copies Provided to: See Service List on next page + +## SERVICE LIST + +M. =, Jr., Esq. + +Jaffe, Weissing, + +, Fistos, P.L. + +425 N. Andrews Ave., #2 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Mr. Jack Goldberger + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA + +250 Australian Avenue South + +Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Charles Lich an, Esq. + +Berger Sing an + +350 East La s Boulevard + +Suite 100 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Mr. Marc S. Nurik + +Law Offices of Marc S. NurikL + +One East Broward Blvd. S + +Suite 700 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 01 + +Jack Scarola, E + +Searcy, De Ya, Barnhart & + +Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Bpdh Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +'`Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. + +bdney J. Janis, Esq. + +Burnett , P.A. + +Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +liknj WAE07431ORDERGEE tdS on Snarl , of Dismissal WP LAI only.JLA (7/27/104:4S) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a9a5de106eb4c6aba1050bdce465cc2f42fadfb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362/EFTA02763362.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763362.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1711, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.45, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.998, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.4191589355469, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.4191589355469, + 177.697021484375 + ], + [ + 256.998, + 177.697021484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763362" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef0d4f7243dcee3af3faaaba05e0bc9b874ba209 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.md @@ -0,0 +1,922 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003000CMBAO + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. =IM individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJEC 0 COUNTER DESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/CO FENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI + +Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, J. b. files his Objections and + +Counter Designations to the following depositio on designated by Jeffrey Epstein for use + +in the instant case and/or as rebuttal: + +A-CPA ATTORNEY-CLI ILEGE ASSERTION + +BE BEST EVID + +SHK SECOND H OWLEDGE + +VS V OLAA STIPULATION + +LP ATION PRIVILEGE + +ARSAY + +OPINION + +R RELEVANCE + +REPETITIOUS + +COMPOUND/NO ANSWER + +S SPECULATION + +P No Proper Predicate + +1. 1=1, . March 23 , 2010 + +| | Response to | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| +| Counter Desig. (BE) Objections (BE) Designation 5:18-21 6:23-24 7:2-5 7:17-8:23 9:7-9 9:13-16, 18-24 | Objections 7:17-8:23 (R) 9:7-9 (R) | +| 9:10-9:24 (Rie"'N'S 10:13-25 11:4-7 | A' 10:1325 P.) ‘..) | +| 11:4-7 (i 11:22-25 11:22-25 12:2-3 12:7-12 12:16-23 13:13-20 14:8-19 15:5-18:2 | ll) VR) | +| 20:16-23 ) 20:16-23 21:1-23:2 | (R) 21:1-23:2 (R) | +| 6 *) | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 23:21-24:17 | | 23:21-24:17(R) | | +| 25:16-24 | | | | +| 26:8-27:3 | | | | +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | | 31:10-15 (R) | | +| 31:20-23 | | 31:20-23 (R) | | +| 36:6-16 | | 36:6-16 (R) | | +| 38:18-24 | | 38:18-24 (R) | | +| 43:4-10 | | 43:4-10 (R) | | +| 45:13-25 | | 45:13-25 (R) | | +| | 49:10-15 | | | +| | 49:17-22 | | | +| | 50:1-4 | | | +| | 51:22-52:14 | | | +| 53:4-54:4 | | 53:4-54:4 (R) | | +| 54:9-10 | | 54:9-10 (R) | | +| 54:14-22 | | 54:14-22 (R) | | +| 55:10-21 | | 55:10-21 (R) | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | | 57:7-25 (R) | | +| 58:11-15 | | 58:11-15 (R) | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | | 63:25-64:15(R) | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| | 79:7-79:23 | | | +| | 80:9-16 | | | +| | 80:23-24 | | | +| | 81-16-20 | | | +| | 82:17-83:3 | | | +| | 83:8-22 | | | +| | 88:6-11 | | | + +| Designation | Counter Desig. (BE) | Objections (BE) | Response to Objections | +|--------------------|----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| | 137:1-7 | | | +| | 137:12-16 | | | +| | 138:1-14 | | | +| | 138:21-139:4 | | | +| | 141:7-9 | | | +| | 141:11-13 | | | +| | 141:15-16 | | | +| | 141:23-142:3 | | | +| | 146:4-16 | | | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | | 156:1-160:2 (R) | | +| 158:4-160:2 | 158:1-3 | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | | 162:21-163:7 (R) | | +| 164:21-166:1 | | 164:21-166:1 (R) | | +| 166:22-167:5 | | 166:22-167:5 (R) | | +| 174:24-175:16 | | 174:24-175:16(R) | | +| 175:22-176:4 | | 175:22-176:4 (R) | | +| 180:5-20 | | 180:5-20 (R) | | +| 182:5-25 | | 182:5-25 (R) | | +| 183:16-184:3 | | 183:16-20 | | +| 185:2-186:17 | | 185:2-186:17(R) | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | | 197:14-198:6(R) | | +| 198:2-6 | | | | +| | 203:19-204:3 | | | +| | 206:20-207:3 | | | +| | 207:8-15 | | | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | | 228:15-229:25(R) | | +| 229:19-24 | | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | + +o) + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | | 252:1-6 (R) | | +| | 261:1-7 | | | +| | 263:7-264:7 | | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | +| | 280:6-281:13 | | | +| | 282:6-9 | | | +| 283:5-284:2 | | 283:10-17 (R) | | +| | | 283:18-19 (R) | | +| | | 283:20-284:2(R) | | +| 286:12-287:6 | | 286:12-287:6(R) | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +2. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: May 15, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 5:13-14 | | | | +| 5:23-6:2 | | | | +| 6:11-19 | | | | +| | 6:20-24 | | | +| 7:3-20 | | | | +| 7:25-8:7 | | 7:16-20 Repetitious | | +| 9:3-7 | | 9:3-7 Repetitious | | +| 11:8-10 | | | | +| | 11:11-20 | | | +| 11:21-12:3 | | | | +| 12:10-13 | | | | +| | 14:24-15:3 | | | +| | 15:17-16:3 | | | +| 16:4-15 | | | | +| 17:16-18:16 | | | | +| 18:20-19:4 | | | | +| 22:24-23:5 | | | | +| 23:25-24:15 | | | | +| 24:19-25:4 | | | | +| 25:9-12 | | | | +| 25:19-29:1 | | | | + +| 29:11-22 | | 29:19-30:7 | | +|-------------|--|------------------|--| +| | | Compound/NoAns. | | +| 30:2 | | | | +| 30:6 | | | | +| 30:25-31:20 | | 31:16-20 Hearsay | | +| 36:9-37:18 | | | | +| 38:13-22 | | | | +| 41:3-16 | | | | +| 42:5-22 | | | | +| 43:12-17 | | | | +| 44:1-13 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 45:6-17 | | | | +| 46:9-47:2 | | | | +| 47:14-23 | | | | +| | 47:24-48:3 | | | +| 48:4-23 | | | | +| 49:7-19 | | | | +| 55:10-57:8 | | 57:5-6 (R), Hearsay | | +| 57:15-58:5 | | | | +| | 58:6-59:5 | | | +| 60:20-61:16 | | 60:24-61:1 Rule 403 | | +| 62:6-10 | | | | +| 70:24-71:20 | | | | +| 72:11-25 | | 72:20-25 R, A-C | | +| | 74:18-25 | | | +| | 75:8-13 | | | +| 75:14-76:8 | | | | +| | 76:11-21 | | | +| | 76:25-78:9 | | | +| | 79:4-8 | | | +| | 79:13-15 | | | + +3. ██████████ J. ██████████ October 10, 2013 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------| +| | 113:7-25 | | | +| | 117:9-21 | | | +| | 125:9-11 | | | +| 130:12-25 | | 130:12-25 Colloquy
of Counsel, R, C | | +| 132:25-133:10 | 133:11-13 | | | +| | 134:5-7 | | | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| | 138:12-139:1 | | | +| 139:6-22 | | 139:6-22 R, LP | | +| | 140:24-141:12 | | | +| | 141:23-142:25 | | | +| 143:1-144:9 | | 143:1-20 R, LP | | +| | 144:19-145:16 | | | +| 152:11-153:14 | | 152:11-153:14 R, LP | | +| 205:9-22 | | 205:9-22 R, LP | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | +| | 207:9-208:1 | | | + +| | 208:7-209:13 | | | +|--|--------------|--|--| +| | 215:18-24 | | | +| | 216:11-14 | | | + +**4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------| +| 5:23-6:1 | | | | +| 8:4-7 | | | | +| 13:9-14:8 | | 13:9-14:8 LP, VS,H | | +| 19:7-11 | | | | +| 19:17-20:1 | | | | +| 20:12-13 | | | | +| 23:4-6 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:8 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:10-19 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 23:24-25 | | 23:4-23-25 H,R,LP | | +| 25:6-26:15 | | 25:6-26:15 | | +| | | Hearsay, 2 nd Hand | | +| | | Knowledge, VS,LP | | +| 28:14-17 | | 28:14-29:14 R, H,
LP, VS | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| | Completeness/Counter | Response to Objections | +|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| Designation | /Cross Designation | Objections | +| 28:19-29:14 | | 28:19-29:14 R, H, LP, VS | +| 29:22-31:7 | | 29:22-30:18 H,LP, VS 31:1-32:11 R,H,LP VS, SHK, BE | +| 31:15-18 | | R,H,LP,VS,SHK, | +| | | A , BE | +| 31:20-32:1 | | R,H,LP, VS, SHK BE | +| 32:3-11 | | R,H,LP,VS, SHK O BE | +| 32:25-33:12 | | 32:25-33:12 Gr. | +| 33:14-21 | | BE,LP i | +| 34:3-35:3 36:10-37:3 | | 34 ) , SHK | +| 37:8-39:2 39:5-20 43:2-3 43:25-44:3 46:16-20 46:22 | ,\ | 7.18-38:25 LP,H '<\' | +| 47:3-6 | ' S) Lw | | +| 47:8-11 | c ) | | +| 47:18-21 17se 48:4-8 | | | +| 48:13-1§S | | 48:13-49: I R,H,LP SHK | +| 48: | | R,H,LP, SHK | +| 21 | | 49:13-50:4 R,H,LP SHK | +| 4 :24-51:4 | | 50:5-51:4 R,H,LP SHK | +| 51:15-17 | | 51:15-52:17 H,LP, A-C, PA, SHK | +| 51:20-52:17 | | H,LP,A-C,PA,SHK | +| 53:8-11 | | 53:8-24 H,SHK, LP,A-C, PA | +| 53:13-24 54:11-55:1 | | H,SHK,LP,A-C,PA | + +| 55:5-22 | | | +|------------|--|--| +| 57:2-10 | | | +| 57:15-25 | | | +| 59:11-60:5 | | | +| 60:18-20 | | | +| 60:22-24 | | | + +# 5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 17:2-5 | | | | +| 17:12-14 | | | | +| 17:16-25 | | | | +| 19:16-20:8 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +tv + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 20:23-21:5 | | | | + +**6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 17th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943)** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|-------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------------| +| 58:8-17 | | 58:8-62:6 H,R,LP | | +| 58:21-60:18 | | | | +| | | | | +| 60:20-62:20 | | 61:15-61:25 H,R,LP | | +| | | C | | +| | | 62:1-61:6 R,H,O | | + +**7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter/
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------------| +| 68:24-69:8 | | 68:24-69:8 R | | +| 69:21-22 | | 69:21-22 R | | +| 69:24 | | 69:24 R | | +| 70:17-71:22 | | 70:17-70:20 R | | +| | | 71:5-71:22 R, LP | | +| 76:8-77:20 | | 76:8-77:20 R, LP | | +| 79:10-24 | | 79:10-24 R, LP | | +| 80:12-23 | | 80:12-23 O,S,R,LP | | +| 83:2-16 | | 83:2-16 R, LP | | +| 85:18-23 | | 85:18-23 R | | +| 86:4-89:10 | | 86:4-89:10 R, LP | | +| 92:4-93:14 | | | | +| 94:3-15 | | 94:3-94:15 R | | +| 95:1-20 | | 95:1-95:4 R | | +| 98:21-99:22 | | 98:21-99:22 R | | +| 104:4-12 | | 104:4-104:12 R | | +| 105:7-107:11 | 107:9-11 | 105:7-105:25 R | | +| | 109:15-19 | | | +| 110:12-19 | | | | +| 110:21-111:12 | | 110:21-111:12 R | | +| 112:3-12 | | 112:3-12 | | +| | 114:9-15 | | | +| 115:10-116:19 | | 115:10-116:19 R LP | | + +| | 116:9-10 | | | +|--------------|--------------|-------------------|--| +| | 116:12-13 | | | +| | 116:24-25 | | | +| | 117:1-2 | | | +| | 117:5-6 | | | +| | 117:12-13 | | | +| 117:14-118:2 | 117:25-118:2 | 117:14-118:2RLPH | | +| 118:14-120:4 | | 118:14-120:4 R LP | | +| | 121:4-122:15 | | | +| | 122:23-124:7 | | | + +8. [REDACTED] S. Adler; April 20, 2011\* + +\* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] OBJECTS TO USE OF THE ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY. ALL IRRELEVANT AS POST-FILING INFORMATION THAT CANNOT SUPPORT P.C. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS ARE SEPARATELY NOTED. + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------|------------------------| +| 63:10-25 | | | | +| | 65:15-66:6 | | | +| | 66:11-20 | | | +| | 72:13-73:1 | | | +| 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| 77:21-78:4 | | | | +| 78:6-17 | | | | +| 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| 96:1-8 | | | | +| 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| 101:19-102:7 | | 101:19-102:7 403 | | +| 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| 106:4-23 | | 106:4-107:4 R | | +| 106:25-107:4 | | | | +| 107:15-23 | | 107:15-23 R | | +| 108:1-5 | | 108:1-3 R | | +| | | 108:4-5 R, 403 | | +| 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| 124:20-126:14 | | | | + +| 151:22-152:22 | | | +|---------------|--|--| +|---------------|--|--| + +9. ██████ Adler; October 28, 2010 (*In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S.D.C.* +Case No. 10-2612-BKC-RBR) \* + +\* ██████ OBJECTS TO THE USE OF THIS ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY +ALSO TESTIMONY GIVEN ON 10/28/10 IS IRRELEVANT TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR +SUIT FILED ON 12/7/09. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS NOTED. + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------|---------------------------| +| 4:1-5:10 | | 4:23-5:12 R | | +| 9:5-12:14 | | 9:5-12:14 R | | +| 16:22-20:12 | | 16:22-20:12 R | | +| 22:9-24:22 | | 22:9-26:20 R | | +| 25:3-26:20 | | | | +| 39:9-51:5 | | 39:9-41:10 R | | +| | | 43:8-55:11 R | | +| 51:10-13 | | | | +| 51:20-52:8 | | | | +| 52:11-14 | | | | +| 52:19-63:15 | | | | +| 70:21-75:6 | | 70:21-78:7 R | | +| 75:9-78:7 | | | | +| 80:14-81:25 | | 80:14-81:25 R | | +| 83:22-88:24 | | 83:22-86:10 R | | +| | | 88:9-88:22 R | | +| | | 88:23-24 R | | +| 100:18-105:22 | | 100:18-106:3 R | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------| +| 105:25-106:3 | | | | +| 107:1-108:18 | | 107:1-108:18 R | | +| 111:6-121:18 | | 111:6-121:18 R | | +| 124:7-18 | | 124:7-124:18 R | | +| 124:23-127:19 | | 124:23-127:19 R | | +| 129:4-12 | | | | +| 131:5-134:25 | | | | +| 144:4-152:20 | | 144:4-152:20 R | | +| 154:4-155:17 | | 154:4-155:17 R | | +| 158:19-159:18 | | 158:19-159:18 R | | +| 161:22-164:14 | | 161:22-164:14 R | | +| 167:13-168:7 | | 167:13-168:7 H | | +| | | SHK | | +| 169:6-170:2 | | 169:6-170:2 H R | | +| | | SHK | | +| 174:21-175:17 | | 174:20-175:17 H | | +| | | SHK, R | | +| 179:23-188:14 | | 179:23-188:14 R | | +| 198:4-199:7 | | 198:4-199:7 R | | + +10. [REDACTED] Kretschmar; February 11, 2011: Entire transcript + +[REDACTED] J. EDWARDS OBJECTS TO USE OF THE ENTIRE DEPOSITION AS HEARSAY. ALSO ALL TESTIMONY IS IRRELEVANT SINCE INFORMATION GATHERED ON 2.11.11 COULD NOT POSSIBLY ESTABLISH P.C. FOR ACTION FILED ON 12.7.09. + +11. Michael Legamaro; March 11, 2011 + +ALL TESTIMONY IS IRRELEVANT SINCE INFORMATION GATHERED ON 3.11.11 COULD NOT POSSIBLY CONTRIBUTE TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR AN ACTION FILED ON 12.7.09 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 4:10-11 | | | | +| | 4:12, 4:14-15 | | | +| | 4:19-24 | | | +| | 5:6-5:12 | | | +| | 5:19-5:21 | | | +| 9:21-22 | 9:21-22 | | | +| 11:2-9 | | | | + +| 11:22-12:17 | 11:24-12:17 | | | +|-------------|-------------|------------|--| +| 13:7-14:1 | 13:7-14:1 | | | +| 14:22-15:5 | | | | +| 15:16-19:2 | 15:22-17:10 | | | +| | 17:20-19:2 | | | +| 19:21-24:15 | 19:21-21:8 | | | +| | 22:6-22:15 | | | +| | 23:9-24:18 | | | +| 25:6-26:7 | | | | +| | 26:18-25 | | | +| 27:11-28:25 | 27:17-30:3 | | | +| 29:7-20 | | | | +| 30:10-31:9 | 30:10-23 | | | +| | 31:2-32:2 | | | +| | 32:17-33:2 | | | +| | 34:10-13 | | | +| | 34:18-21 | | | +| | 34:24-35:6 | | | +| | 38:17-39:1 | | | +| | 41:21-44:5 | | | +| | 44:19-45:2 | | | +| | 45:5-6 | | | +| | 45:13-16 | | | +| | 45:19-46:4 | | | +| 45:22-46:4 | | | | +| 46:24-47:10 | 46:24-47:7 | | | +| 47:14-51:1 | | 48:22-25 O | | +| | 49:1-50:13 | | | +| 51:4 | | | | +| 51:6-17 | | | | +| 52:1-53:22 | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 53:24-54:6 | | | | +| 65:18-66:2 | 65:18-66:2 | | | +| 67:16-23 | | | | +| | 120:2-8 | | | +| | 120-21-24 | | | +| | 121:1-5 | | | +| | 132:20-21 | | | +| | 133:25-134:20 | | | + +**12. Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala; May 25, 2011** + +**ALL TESTIMONY IS IRRELEVANT SINCE INFORMATION GATHERED 5.25.11 COULD NOT POSSIBLY CONTRIBUTE TO ESTABLISHING P.C. FOR AN ACTION FILED 12.7.09.** + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-21 | | | | +| 7:13-19 | | | | +| 7:25-8:10 | | 8:3-8:10 R | | +| 8:20-9:5 | | 8:20-9:5 R | | +| 10:9-18 | | 10:9-11:6 R | | +| 10:22-11:6 | | | | +| 28:5-14 | | | | +| 28:17-20 | | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | | +| 30:5-25 | | | | +| 45:13-22 | | | | +| 47:13-22 | | | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | | | +| 88:22-89:1 | | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | | +| 90:8-23 | | | | +| 91:7-11 | | | | +| 91:14-92:16 | | | | +| 93:17-18 | | | | +| 93:21-94:6 | | | | +| 95:1-17 | | | | +| 99:25-100:11 | | | | +| 101:5-11 | | | | +| 103:10-14 | | | | +| 107:7-108:3 | | | | +| 108:21-23 | | | | +| 116:19-117:10 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter
/Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 130:25-131:13 | | | | +| 132:13-25 | | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | | | | +| 136:6-12 | | | | +| 141:7-19 | | | | +| 141:21-23 | | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | | | | +| 152:4-10 | | | | +| 152:18-20 | | | | +| 152:22-153:5 | | | | +| 154:4-14 | | | | +| 155:12-25 | | | | +| 156:7-21 | | | | +| 158:17-159:24 | | | | +| 160:3-8 | | | | +| 160:13-161:5 | | | | +| 161:10-11 | | | | +| 176:8-22 | | | | +| 179:5-11 | | | | +| 180:22-182:2 | | | | +| 184:2-11 | | | | +| 184:19-185:11 | | | | +| 185:16-22 | | | | +| 186:5-187:14 | | | | +| 187:16-189:15 | | | | +| 191:6-192:13 | | | | +| 195:7-196:11 | | | | +| 199:24-200:3 | | | | +| 200:5-12 | | | | +| 200:19-21 | | | | +| 200:23-201:16 | | | | +| 203:16-21 | | | | +| 204:3-7 | | | | +| 205:8-10 | | | | +| 205:12-206:2 | | | | +| 206:4-11 | | | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | | +| 208:7-13 | | | | +| 208:16-18 | | | | +| 212-9-213:22 | | | | +| 214:24-25 | | | | +| 215:6-9 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------| +| 246:7-247:22 | | | | +| 248:7-249:7 | | | | +| 252:10-253:10 | | | | +| 254:6-12 | | | | +| 254:19-256:4 | | | | +| 258:16-259:25 | | | | +| 260:7-12 | | | | +| 260:24-261:13 | | | | +| 275:14-276:20 | | | | +| 277:2-6 | | 277:16-21 S, O | | +| 277:16-21 | | | | +| 281:19-283:3 | | | | +| 283:10-284:9 | | | | +| 284:15-25 | | | | +| 285:21-23 | | | | +| 286:4-10 | | | | +| 286:14-18 | | | | +| 286:20-21 | | | | +| 290:4-13 | | | | +| 356:2-18 | | | | +| 356:23-357:7 | | | | +| 357:16-358:11 | | | | +| 358:15-16 | | | | +| 365:20-366:6 | | | | +| 366:8-22 | | | | + +13. [REDACTED] ; October 12, 2017 + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------| +| 5:3-11:22 | | | | +| | | 5:21-25 R, 403 II | | +| | | 6:1-25 R, 403 II | | +| | | 7:1-24 R, II | | +| | | 8:5-6 R, II | | +| | | 8:12-25 R, II, 403 | | +| | | 9:1-25 R, 403, II | | +| | | 10:1-25 R, 403, II | | +| | | 11:1-22 R, 403, II | | +| 14:10-18 | | 14:10-25 R, 403, II | | +| 14:21-15:12 | | 15:1-25 R, 403 II | | +| 15:15-16:2 | | | | +| 16:7-10 | | 16:1-18 R, 403, II | | + +| 16:14-18 | | | | +|-------------|---------|----------------------|--| +| 17:18-19:16 | | 17:18-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 18:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 19:1-16 R, 403, I I | | +| 20:22-25:17 | | 20:22-25 R | | +| | | 21:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 22:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 23:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 24:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 25:1-18 R, 403, I I | | +| 26:24-28:8 | | 26:24-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 27:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| 28:11-29:4 | | 28:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 29:1-5 R, 403, I I | | +| 34:2-16 | | 34:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| 34:18-35:6 | | 35:1-7 R, 403, I I | | +| | 40:8-25 | | | +| | 41:1-10 | | | +| 45:3-47:19 | | 45:3-25 R, 403 | | +| | | 46:1-25 R, 403 I I | | +| | | 47:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------------| +| 47:23-49:21 | | 48:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 49:1-23 R, 403, I I | | +| 51:13-21 | | | | +| 53:14-54:15 | | 53:14-25 R, 403, I I | | +| 54:17-56:8 | | 54:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 55:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 56:1-8 R, 403, I I | | +| 56:21-57:3 | | 56:21-25 R, 403, I I | | +| | | 57:1-25 R, 403, I I | | +| 57:9-13 | | | | +| 57:15-58:9 | | 58:5-9 R, 403, I I | | +| | 58:10-58:21 | | | +| | 59:3-59:17 | | | +| | 61:7-61:15 | | | +| | 65:20-66:3 | | | +| | 66:18-67:15 | | | +| 86:8-22 | | | | +| 91:14-92:10 | | 91:14-25 R, M, 403 | | +| | | 92:1-10 R, M, 403 | | +| | 100:10-101:4 | | | +| | 102:1-102:10 | | | +| | 103:4-103-16 | | | +| | 105:6-105:18 | | | +| 108:21-109:2 | | | | +| | 109:5-109:11 | | | +| | 109:21-109:23 | | | +| | 111:22-111:25 | | | +| | 112:20-113:2 | | | +| | 113:10-113:15 | | | +| | 115:24-116:5 | | | +| | 116:8-116:15 | | | +| 116:16-22 | | | | +| 117:7-118:7 | | | | +| 120:6-23 | | | | +| 121:6-122:23 | | 121:6-121:19 R,C | | +| | | 121:20-122:3 P | | + +| | | 122:4-122:14 C, P | | +|--------------|---------------|-------------------|--| +| 123:8-124:23 | | | | +| | | 124:1-124:23 C, R | | +| | 125:3-125:6 | | | +| | 125:8-125:11 | | | +| | 125:13-125:16 | | | +| | 125:18-125:21 | | | +| | 125:23 | | | +| | 125:25-126:21 | | | +| | 128:21-128:25 | | | +| | 129:2 | | | +| | 129:4-129:5 | | | +| | 129:7-129:9 | | | +| | 129:11-129:14 | | | +| | 129:16-129:19 | | | +| | 129:21-129:24 | | | +| | 130:1-130:4 | | | +| | 130:6-130:12 | | | +| | 130:14-130:17 | | | +| | 130:19-130:20 | | | +| | 130:22-130:23 | | | +| | 130:25-132:7 | | | +| | 132:9-135:1 | | | +| | 135:6-135:18 | | | +| | 135:20-137:24 | | | +| | 138:1-138:2 | | | +| | 138:5-138:13 | | | +| | 139:12-140:10 | | | +| | 140:15-140:19 | | | +| | 141:23-142:1 | | | +| | 142:10-142:13 | | | +| | 142:15-143:11 | | | +| | 143:18-144:21 | | | +| | 145:5-145:9 | | | +| | 145:11-145:16 | | | +| | 145:18-145:21 | | | +| | 146:10-146:13 | | | +| | 146:17-146:24 | | | + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] expressly reserves the right to amend or supplement these objections to designations, including any additional depositions taken in this or other related matters. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of December, 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm + +Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..742d630055fa4fdb34748103b4c02e973e880166 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364/EFTA02763364.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,925 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763364.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 26, + "chars": 72346, + "elapsed_seconds": 233.68, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL OBJEC 0 COUNTER \nDESIGNATIONS TO PLAINTIFF/CO FENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 520.60791015625, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 520.60791015625, + 327.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 327.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 October 10, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 306.61199999999997, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 306.61199999999997, + 434.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 434.15999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Jeffrey Epstein; March 17, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 276.012, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 276.012, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 150.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Jeffrey Epstein; January 25, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 286.5575256347656, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 286.5575256347656, + 192.85247802734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 192.85247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Scott Rothstein; December 12, 2011 (Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 177.39000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. Scott Rothstein; June 14, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 345.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12. Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala; May 25, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 263.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 76.94999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763364" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00c216f45c7d9ead87412ae5c523e81308f2d821 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OO1XMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAX\_OF PROCEEDINGS + +THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court for hearing on December 5, 2017, upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings, and the Court, having reviewed the file, considered the arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record and summarized as follows: + +- 1. In choosing to file suit, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was well-positioned to recognize the potential exposure that existed at the time the suit was filed, specifically that a malicious prosecution case could have been pursued by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a"), in the event that Epstein was unsuccessful in prosecuting the underlying complaint. Epstein nonetheless chose to file suit with constructive knowledge of this potentiality. +- 2. Epstein filed his Motion for Temporary Stay on October 4, 2017, two months before the trial was set to commence. The Court finds Epstein's Motion is untimely. + +- 3. The Court recognizes that at a hearing on January 27, 2014, final summary judgment was found in Epstein's favor, which was memorialized in an Order on May 19, 2014, and a Final Judgment on May 27, 2014, and that the matter was on appeal for almost three years, from June 19, 2014, through June 9, 2017. However, the Court also recognizes that Epstein filed suit on December 7, 2009 and th ed to move for a stay at critical times throughout the course of this eight-yeir-old case, as identified in + +Opposition to Epstein's Motion for TempOrary tay as follows: + +- a. Epstein actively litigated the claims in his initial Complaint for the next year and a half during which time Epstein had the burden of proof to establish that had in fact fabricated his clients' claims against Epstein; +- b. Epstein filed his Amended Complaint on April 12, 2011, in which Epstein referred to the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceeding (Jane Doe v. United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-cv-80736-KAM) and alleged that one of the purposes of that proceeding was the "invalidation of the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement"; +- c. Epstein failed to move to stay previously-filed Amended Counterclaim, Second Amended Counterclaim or Third Amended Counterclaim, all of which included a claim for malicious prosecution; +- d. Epstein failed to request a stay of these proceedings after moving to t ie in the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceeding on September 2, Epstein failed to request a stay of these roceedings after voluntarily dismissing his remaining claims against on August 16, 2012; +- f. E stein failed to request a stay of these proceedings after the Court granted i an entitlement to plead for punitive damages, thereby putting Epstein's financials at issue, on December 18, 2012; and +- g. Epstein actively defended against sole-remaining claim for malicious prosecution for the next five years, at both the trial and appellate + +levels, thereby causing the parties to incur substantial litigation-related expenses. + +- 4. The Court also finds that further delay of this eight-year-old case would cause prejudice to Counter-Plaintiff, J. +- 5. Finally, the Court finds that there is no foreseeable end to the nee ( f stein to invoke the protection of his Fifth Amendment rights. The C;i e ictims' Rights Act proceeding challenging the validity of Epstein's limited immunity from further criminal prosecution is a civil proceeding subject to appeal by either party, regardless of its outcome. The ultimate outcome of the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceeding and the impact on the continued validity of the Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically relates to prosecution of Epstein in the Federal Southern District ofFlorida, and does not speak to prosecption of Epstein in other federal jurisdictions. + +6. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this Pr + +day of + +THE HO RA NALD W. HIAFELE CIRCUIT COURT JUD E + +Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings Epstein v. Rothstein and Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAC + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the following counsel list. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +dvitale@searcylaw.com; + +Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esquire + +Jack Scarola, Esquire + +jsx earcylaw.com + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 AsTCC449 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. Esquire + +Pottinger LLC + +staffefile@pathtojustice.com + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954) 524-2820 + +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter- 'dtiff J. • + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquir y + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561) 659-8300 + +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings** +**Epstein v. Rothstein and [REDACTED]** +**Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG** + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 721-0400 +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +Angela M. Many, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 727-3600 +Fax: (561) 727-3601 +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3824b465d39c55b008beb8240598717ecdaa7c8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390/EFTA02763390.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763390.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6471, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.284, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 542.844, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 310.284, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAX_OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 518.952392578125, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 518.952392578125, + 349.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 349.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 347.7082824707031, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 347.7082824707031, + 223.10302734375 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 223.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763390" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa0936044c033441915145bbcd0bcbfe1d608acf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.md @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## JOINT PRETRIAL STIfULATION + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Specially Setting Jury Trial Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein-) and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff a") hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Stipulation. 1=\_, + +- A. List of All Pending Motions: The trial of this matter is special set to commence on March 13, 2018. The parties anticipate that additional Motions will be filed before that date. Presently, the following Motions/Requests are pending: + - 1. 9/21/17, Ed a de four Motions to Compel and the following related filing: + - a. 1/27/1 , Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to ions to Compel. Four + 2. 10/ 17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential ettlement Agreement Against and His Counsel and the following related filing: + - a. 11/8/17, Response in Opposition. + - 3. 10/26/17, Motion for Protective Order. + - 4. 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/15/17, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery; + +- b. 9/25/17, EFS -esMotion to Compel Discovery Responses from and +- c. 9/28/17, Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motio to Compel Discovery Responses. +- 5. 11/8/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Flo 90.202 and 90.203, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection to Request + - b. 11/28/17, Epstein's Notice of Filing Supplement al Notice; and +- y. tatutes Section +- 6. 11/13/17, Motion in Limine Address' ope of Admissible Evidence and the following firelated lings: + - a. 11/17/17, Supplement to imine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; + - b. 11/22/17, Epstein's Oppositio ' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evide + - c. 4 12/11/17, Sec Scope of Admissible E +- 7. 11/17/17, following related +- a. 11/13/17, E ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Notice of Production from Non-Parties and the otice of Production from Non-Parties. +- 8. 11/22/17, stein's equest for Judicial Notice. +- 9. 12/1/ , Ed s' Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission. +12/4/17, Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege. +- 12. 12/4/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. +- 13. 12/8/17, Notice of Filing Preliminary Objections and Counter Designations to Epstein's Deposition Designations. +- 14. 12/15/17, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness +- 10. 1 wards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery nses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II — V only). + +# B. Stipulated Facts: + +- 1. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea for one count Amm\ ny licitation of prostitution, a third-degree felony, and one count of pr person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a second-degree felony. 107.) +- 2. was admitted to The Florida Bar in March 07 ( ' 11/10/17 Depo. 43:10-12.) +- 3. After being admitted to the Florida Bar orked as an Assistant State Atte at the Broward State Afton% for approximately three years. 5/15/13 Depo. 6:11-15; /10/17 Depo. 50:3-5.) +- 4. After leaving the Broward S 's Office, went to work for the law firm of Kubicki Dra he worked for approximately three handling insurance defe al 5/15/13 Depo. 7:3-10; 11/10/17 Depo. 56:10 117\W hik an employee of RRA, represented himself to the public, including Epstein, as a partner of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 189:22-192:9.) +- 5. formed united liability company on April 16, 2007, by the name of "The Law O Brad & Associates, LLC." (Sunbiz.org.) +- 6. rking at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA") in April 2009 Ed s' 3/23/10 Depo. 13:19-22.) +- 7. association with RRA terminated at the end of October or beginning of mber 2009. ( 3/23/10 Depo. 15:5-11.) +- 9. Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 267:12-13.) +- 10. Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license in November 2009 and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 25, 2009. (11/25/09 Opinion, The Florida Bar v. Rothstein, Supreme Court of Florida, Case No. SC09- 2146.) + +- 11. Rothstein was arrested and arraigned in federal court in Broward Co ty, Florida on December 1, 2009. (12/1/09 Information, United States ofAmeri a Rothstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case N 1 (D.E. I).) +- 12. In August and September 2008, while working at The La o Brad & Associates, LLC, filed three separate laws Epstein on behalf of three separate clients: L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. (8 Complaint, Jane Doe + - v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern 'strict of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 (D.E. 1); 9/11/08 Com t, LM. v. Jeffiey Epstein, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Coun e po. 50-2008-CA-028051 (D.E. 4); 9/11/08 Complaint, E.W. v. Jeffrey 5''' Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-C #1: , E. 4).) +- 13. E stein does not admit or deny when he was a sole and Jane Doe). However filed the lawsuits agai +- 14. While an emplo Jane Doe cases +- 15. While an e stmOd A litik'tic) t erointlibee hal . allegations ofhis in the three ollaiewsotsui(tLbromuttwby es not challenge good faith when he pstein. 11/20/17 Depo. 78:3-6; 120:11-18.) Mists the lead attorney on the L.M., E.W. and of RRA, was the sole employee of RRA who made ions on the L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases against Epstein. 1 /20/17 Depo. 85:2-15.) 16.E an employee of RRA, did not represent any individuals other than , E.W. and Jane Doe with regard to claims against Epstein. ( 3/23/10 po. 291:8; 11/10/17 Depo. 77:1-7.) +- 17. On July 24, 2009, while was employed by RRA, a Complaint was filed on behalf of L.M. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (7/24/09 Complaint, L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 (D.E. 1).) +- 18. L.M. already had a state court action pending against Epstein at the time the July 24, 2009, federao Complaint was filed which was based on the same facts and circumstances. 11/10/17 Depo. 316:11-20.) + +- 19. never formally served Epstein with the federal Complaint t was filed on behalf of L.M. against Epstein. al 5/15/13 Depo. 34:10 +- 20. L.M.'s July 24, 2009, federal Complaint against Epstein allege her into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engage intercourse with Epstein and she never touched his geni Complaint 142(j) (D.E. 19).) Epstein forced I or vaginal Answer to +- 21. While was employed by RRA he mad emston to take the deposition of three pilots who had flown, at different lanes used by Epstein, and am deposition of a fourth pilot Answer to Complaint 1 36 e litigation against Epstein. +- 22. On August 24, 2009, L.M. not sitions of Epstein's pilots Paul Visoski, Jr., and David rs. L.M. requested they produce "[a]ll original flight logs from 4 , 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets w piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffre or Ghislaine Maxwell." (8/24/09 Notices of Deposition and Su ces Tecums, L M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm l h nty, Case No. 50-2008-C A-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 114, 11 +- 23. In August pile was employed by RRA, he noticed the deposition of Id p in the Jane Doe litigation. (8/11/09 and 8/24/09, Re-Notices of T Videotaped Depositions, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District +- 24. Cie them District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893.) was employed by RRA, he served Answers to Interro atones on half of L.M. and E.W. indicating that he intended to call Bill who was the governor of New Mexico a, as a trial witness as part of clients' litigation against Epstein. Answer to Complaint 140 (D.E. 19).) +- 25. a three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) never testified that they had sex with a celebrity, dignitary or international figure associated with Epstein. a 11/10/17 Depo. 167:21-168:10.) +- 26. In August 2009, a, on behalf of his client E.W., served a Request for Entry Upon Land seeking to inspect Epstein's entire home and property and to take videos + +and photograph it. (8/10/09, Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 143).) + +1. 27. On August 20, 2009, the Court in the E.W. matter noted that E.W.'s request to inspect Epstein's entire home and property was withdrawn. (8/20/09, Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 151).) +2. 28. In August and September 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's medical records from Stephen Alexander, Bruce W. Markowitz and Charles J. Galecki. The Subpoenas sought, "[t]he complete medical file including MRIs, scans, X-rays and any other diagnostic test result, Intake Form, notes, reports, opinions, correspondence to or from third parties, correspondence to or from Jeffrey Epstein, referrals, medical bills, in short, your complete file." (8/19/09 and 9/11/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 105, 127, 129).) +3. 29. On August 14, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's prescription history from Lewis Pharmacy and Greens Pharmacy. The Subpoenas sought, "[a] complete computer printout of any and all prescriptions for medication, name and type of prescription, and all other documentation or information on or regarding Jeffrey Epstein." (8/14/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 97, 100).) +4. 30. On April 24, 2007, L.M., before she was a client of [REDACTED], provided a statement to the FBI. +5. 31. In September 2009, while [REDACTED] was employed by RRA, his client, L.M., testified at a deposition in her case against Epstein. +6. 32. On June 19, 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his Jane Doe client, filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure + +Potential Judgment. (6/19/09 Motion, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-\$0119 (D.E. 165).) + +- 33. In July Jane Doe). 20101.in settled the claims of three die .W., L.M. and 11/10/17 Depo. 305:2-3.) +- 34. The Ponzi scheme through which Rothstein misrep investors began in 2005 and ended in October 2009. for Forfeiture In Rem 1 13, United States v. R Rothstein, United States District Court, Sout CV-61780 (D.E. 1).) +- 35. On November 20, 2009, certain Rothstein in the Seventeenth Ju Florida. This lawsuit was p (11/20/09 Complaint, Razor Judicial Circuit C 062009CA062943 ms and defrauded Verified Complaint operties Purchased by Scott 'et of Florida, Case No. 09 f Rothstein's Ponzi scheme sued Ire ft Court, in and for Broward County, ublic record as of the date it was filed. ing, LLC, et at v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 17th ward County, Florida, Case No. +- 36. The United S govAfttfient filed an Information against Rothstein on or about December 1, 2 s criminal charge was public record as of the date it was filed. (12/ /09 In ation, United States of America v. Rothstein, United States District Co uthern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331.) +38. ',ember 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (12/21/09 Answer and Counterclaim, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 19).) +- 37. O ember 7 2009, Epstein filed a civil Complaint in this action against and L.M. (12/7/09 Complaint, Jetey Epstein v. Scott tein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 09CA40800XXXM13 (D.E. 5).) +- 39. represented L.M. in this litigation. ( 11/10/17 Depo. 255:5-11.) a +- 40. did not charge L.M. for his representation of her in this litigation. 11/10/17 Depo. 255:12-19; 257:23-258:1.) + +1. 41. [REDACTED] did not enter into any written representation agreement with L.M. concerning his representation of her in this litigation. ([REDACTED] 11/10/17 Depo. 255:20-256:8; 258:2-4.) +2. 42. On January 21, 2010, a Default was entered against Rothstein in this litigation as to all claims in the December 7, 2009, Complaint against Rothstein. (1/21/10 Default, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 27).) +3. 43. In early August 2010, L.M. and Epstein entered into a Stipulation for Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Individually, Only. (8/5/10 Stipulation, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 112).) +4. 44. On August 9, 2010, the Court entered a Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Only approving L.M. and Epstein's Stipulation. (8/9/10 Final Order, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 113).) +5. 45. On January 5, 2011, Epstein moved to amend his Complaint, to eliminate certain paragraphs. (1/5/11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 195).) +6. 46. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothstein and Edwards for abuse of process. (4/12/11 Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 303).) +7. 47. On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint, which was corrected on August 24, 2011, bringing a claim for abuse of process against [REDACTED] and for conspiracy to commit abuse of process against Rothstein. (8/22/11 Second Amended Complaint and 8/24/11 Notice of Scrivener's Error and Corrected Second Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 368, 370).) + +- 48. On November 3, 2011, moved for Final Summary Judgment on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. (11/3/11 Renewed Motion for Find Summary Judgment, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al., 15th Judicial Circ ourt, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 401).) +- 49. appeared in this action as his own co-counsel on the suit against him was dismissed. ( 11/10/1 Notice of Appearance, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothste Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA408 +- 50. On July 26, 2012, the Court set the hearing o Summary Judgment to be held on Augus Motion to Reschedule Hearing, Jeffi• Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach (D.E. 512).) +- 51. Epstein dismissed his claim 2012. (8/16/12 Notice o et al., 15th Judie 502009CA40800 +- 52. inco the present than January 20 2012, before :7-22; 3/27/12 Judicial Circuit B (D.E. 468).) ' Renewed Motion for Final (7/26/12 Order on + - v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15 ase No. 502009CA40800XXXMB our prejudice against on August 16, Dismissal, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. . 519).) lawyer has been collective) greater from January 2010 to as from 2002 when started practicing law through wards' 11/10/17 Depo. 47:10-14; 49:4-13.) +- 53. s is not claiming a loss of income as a result of his reputation being injured ps n's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. 10/10/13 Depo. 1-22.) +wards has not seen a doctor or taken any medication as a result of the anxiety caused by this lawsuit. ( ' 5/15/13 Depo. 57:23-58:5; 11/10/17 Depo. 112:11-20.) + +**C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:** + +1. Case Against Rothstein. What, if any, damages were sustained by Epstein and proximately caused by Rothstein? ([REDACTED] does not agree with this language for the reason that the issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Ponzi scheme. It is [REDACTED] position that failure to limit the issue in this way as to Rothstein has the potential of confusing the jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable cause to claim damages against [REDACTED] arising out of the same circumstances.) + +2. Malicious Prosecution Counterclaim. The following are issues of fact for determination at trial on [REDACTED] Counterclaim against Epstein: + +A. Epstein's Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were not sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against [REDACTED] was supported by existing facts and, thus, Epstein did not have probable cause to institute his civil proceeding. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were insufficient to support a belief on the part of a reasonably cautious person that [REDACTED] had engaged in conduct that supported Epstein's claims against [REDACTED]. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction. The parties agree that, in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether probable cause existed to support the institution of the civil proceeding brought by Epstein against [REDACTED] is an issue of law to be determined by the Court.) + +B. If Epstein had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against [REDACTED] at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding + +against [REDACTED], based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against [REDACTED] was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring [REDACTED] or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +[REDACTED] Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against Edwards resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. ([REDACTED] disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +E. Whether Epstein's civil proceeding against [REDACTED] was terminated in favor of [REDACTED]. ([REDACTED] contends this is a legal issue for determination by the Court.) + +F. Whether the institution or continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] was a substantial contributing cause of damage to [REDACTED] and, but for the malicious institution or continuation of the proceeding, [REDACTED] damage would not have occurred. + +G. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate [REDACTED] for his compensatory damages that resulted from Epstein's institution or continuation of the civil proceeding against [REDACTED]. + +- D. Exhibit Lists (with OW Exhibit Lists and to ide disclosed and/or provid +- H. Whether Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduc reckless disregard or gross negligence which was a substantial cause of d: ages. +- I. Whether punitive damages are warranted as punislune in for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against ds d/or as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding wi ble cause. +- J. Whether the claimed damage is a result of state made after the institution of the civil proceeding and are thu ro ted by the litigation privilege, even if any such statements to untrue. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Ins ut disputes it is appropriate because he believe Amended Complaints are "statements made after the i ut the civil proceeding" and are afforded no protection by th privilege.) +- K. Bifurcated Proceeding: ount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages 7 a punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceed\* againsPEdwards and/or as a deterrent to others. Nile parties do not waive their right to amend their onal objections for those exhibits that have not yet been rrespond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + - I. 't List and Epstein's Objections are attached as Composite Exc. + - 2. ein Exhibit List and Objections are attached as Composite it B. +- E. Lists: The parties do not waive their right to amend their Witness Lists. Witness List is attached as Exhibit C. + - 2. Epstein's Witness List is attached as Exhibit D. +- F. Estimated Trial Time: estimates 10 trial days; Epstein estimates 15-20 trial days. + +# G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case: + +For Jeffrey Epstein: Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 + +For J. Jack Scarola David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev 41. A Telephone: (561) 686-6300 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +## H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three. + +### 1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities + +- sed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite Exhi it E. +- 2. proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite bi F. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein and* [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Joint Pretrial Stipulation +Page 14 + +DATED: December 22, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +(561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +![]()LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link, with permission +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1c85292028d8e8d8efbcb46fe7c15c4c654b935 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395/EFTA02763395.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,690 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763395.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 24023, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 116.103515625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 116.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT PRETRIAL STIfULATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 400.9151916503906, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 400.9151916503906, + 346.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 346.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Stipulated Facts:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 213.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 213.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.3 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 187.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 187.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 429.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 429.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to \nsupporting authorities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 471.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 471.06353759765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763395" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..339cab324d5597198be42c9f4a0296db6c499840 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.md @@ -0,0 +1,3876 @@ +# EXHIBIT A + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +EQSA + +#### COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'SSRbLEY J. a SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-' RADLEY J. a, and hereby files his Amended Exhibit List as follows: + +#### BJE + +- O. No objection 5. Privileged +- 1. All objections 6. Opinion +- 2. All objec ea pt authenticity 7. Hearsay +- 3. Irrelev aterial 8. Authenticity lacking +- 4. Probafl ie value substantially 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CAUM9ZXW. aag: + +Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Second Amended Exhibit List + +| No. 1. 2. 3. | Counter-Plaintiff Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification All applicable criminal statutes. All applicable Florida Statutes. airplanes and automobiles. AS | +|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase 0 of books SM 101: A Realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abema A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. \ | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. | +| 7. | Messages taken from m *ound at Epstein's home. | +| 8. | Documents relat Epstein produced by Alfredo Rod | +| 9. | Jeffrey Ep 's flight logs. | +| 10. | Je Epst 's phone records. | +| 11. | len's phone records. | +| 1 | isitation Logs. 13. Y Jeffrey Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection, 01/18/10. | + +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's | +|--------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | +| | OO 1S | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epste' | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High Sc k. | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach Hi ear Book. | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gar chool Year Book. | +| 27. | Affidavit and A t or Search Warrant | +| | on Jeffrey Epste 's h e (from Palm Beach | +| | State Attorney's , Exhibit #29). | +| 28. | Note s fo nd in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or | +| | d ' trash ulls outside of his home during | +| 29. ,÷ | g ' aim Beach State Attorney's Criminal file | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | + +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | + +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits re against | +| | Jeffrey Epstein and 464488k | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report is) | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department I Report dated | +| 49. | All reports and documer rated by Palm | +| | Beach Police Dep t to Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 50. | All Witness Stat en erated by Palm | +| | Beach Police nt relating to Jeffrey | +| 51. | P er MRttifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft | +| 52. | nger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009111111111MBAG Counter-Plaint if's, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| | Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant. | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated | +| | 07/25/06 (unredacted) Aetisc | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. () | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Co I i Control and Probation. | +| 63. | Jef₹'rey Epstein's Sex Offender Regis 11s , m various states). | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking ph p | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL B Y, | +| | PALM BEACH FL O. | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey E , use contacts. | +| 67. | Documen tt lated itlir to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | +| 68. | Lett m ief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler. | +| 69. | .. , B h Police Department Incident Report dated 06 (redacted)D | +| | tter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/11/06. | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/13/06. | + +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 02/17/06. | | | | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 04/06/06. | | | | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 04/10/06. | | | | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger, 06/22/06. | | | | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. | | | | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for Vanessa [REDACTED]. | | | | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents. | | | | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties. | | | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of Sarah Kellen. | | | | +| 81. | Police report regarding [REDACTED] picking up money dated 11-28-04. | | | | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. | | | | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute 90.410. | | | | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 04/17/06. | | | | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | | | | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | | | | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | | | | + +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 89. | Flight information for | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: Maria. | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case. | +| | 404 A | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5t^ Amendment Speech. | +| 94. | IC:4).( Reiter letter to Krisher, 05/01/06. | +| 95. | Police Report, 11/28/04. | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts. \ | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter to Virgi % a re , 09/03/08 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi e t J y Epstein's | +| 99. | Victim's Medical R Dr. Randee Speciale. | +| 100. | All surveillance ondu t d by law | +| | enforcement on Epstein's home. | +| 101. | Emails re c rom Palm Beach Records | +| | rel to Je y Epstein. | +| 102. | et em listed on the Palm Beach Police Property | +| | rt, Lists and/or Property Receipts. | +| 1011 | copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police | + +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped | +|------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records | +| | party to this cause. AeAsk | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not | +| 109. | reserves all objections to Epstein' | +| 110. | reserves the right to supplem | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, Edward no ving | +| | his right to object to same at a oes not | +| | waive their right to ame e. | +| 112. | All exhibits listed subject to | +| 113. | All pleadi and a chments in the action | +| | under the ictims Rights Act prosecuted | +| | by B ley wards on behalf of victims of | +| | E 's criminal molestations. | +| | Ed s' Motions for Summary Judgment, all | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses | + +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | | | | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | | | | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | | | | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 121. | Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. | | | | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein owned or controlled aircraft. | | | | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case. | | | | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | | | | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017. | | | | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009. | | | | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013. | | | | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013. | | | | + +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records | +| 131. | Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: l' | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Ho | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (sign | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the S ml r. | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Col Photo Virginia | +| 137. | Color photo of V im its on ferry "New York". | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Tii Square. | +| 139. | Virgi "tt Ro crt photo on back of ship. | +| 140. | room in New York. | +| 141. | photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch). | +| 142. | Color photo of at Zorro Ranch | +| 143. | photo on horse front of ranch. | +| 144. | photo standing against rocks (red | + +| 145. | =ding against rocks (red coat) (far) | +|------|---------------------------------------------| +| | (with back photo I= back date). | +| 146. | photo riding horse blue jacket far. | +| 147. | photo on side of horse hand up. | +| 148. | photo on side of horse. Ad ak' | +| 149. | photo outside next to tables. | +| 150. | photo red coat leaning on rail. | +| 151. | photo standing outside next to | +| 152. | photo standing in front o | +| 153. | Millp photo with hand ov | +| 154. | photo standi t td piano. | +| 155. | photo ' fireplace (museum). | +| 156. | o nt of wagon in museum. | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of museum | +| | exhibition ( Fe, New Mexico). | +| 158. | Pho ph i pain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine | +| 159. | is (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2. | +| 160. | Cover photo book 2. | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | + +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | +|------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 165. | steps with trees overhead. | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo In. | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo I M) . | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). C) " | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photo and black). | +| 171. | )) Scenic photo (with back photo and blac? 5 | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo an | +| 173. | on steps with chi ' ck photo | +| 174. | on street (far) (with back | +| | photo and black). | +| 175. | Travel envelope. | +| 176. | Singapore Airlin el Cover with handwritten notes | +| | by Virginia ' i its. | +| 177. | Thai Hott Receipts. | +| 178. | o D ket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein. | +| 17 | List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of in | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition. | + +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File). | | | | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 185. | Airport Codes ( Demonstrative ). | | | | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | | | | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1. | | | | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05. | | | | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account. | | | | +| 190. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files). | | | | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005. | | | | +| 192. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED]: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement. | | | | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997). | | | | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | + +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09. | +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. ,O4.14/\1 1 | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. | +| 201. | Passport application; issued January 12, 2001. CO % | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 203. | Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez. ,S ) | +| 204. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez,, | +| 205. | .‘ Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's pro es and planes. | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein e y and former | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein G " ocuments. | +| 208. | Palm Beach Count C e Attorney's Response to Public | +| | Records R including audio recordings). | +| 209. | Any d all nses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with | +| | o th eposition. | +| 210. | errogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to | +| 211. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 213. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition. | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | | | | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | | | | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | | | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action. | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED]. Second Amended Exhibit List + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 hc.gargiaaaMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Second Amended Exhibit List + +J. , Esquire alle®pathtojusti Jaffe WeissingilinFistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Alk " + +,1O + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 C O efiling®tonjahaddad.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +iS 5) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein c + +?S' + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S 0 S TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND D EXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps in") hereby files his Objections to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. wards") Second Amended Exhibit List dated December 7, 2017, and states: ibit 14 — Trade secre + +On December 7, 2017, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List identifying 218 exhibits, which modified some of his earlier disclosed exhibits and identified 79 new items.' (D.E. 1109.) At no time during the special set hearings did counsel advise the Court that he intended to amend the Exhibit List or that the panics and Court were working from an incorrect list. + +Epstein will be filing a renewed Motion in Liminc to address M iltAikdisclosed exhibits. For ease of reference, Epstein has highlighted the changes and n c5' 'dentified. + +### LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS: + +### OBJECTIONS + +| No.4 | %•-1 Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 1. | II applicable criminal statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3, 4, 7, II, 12 | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | | + +While produced many of the new exhibits on November 9, 2017, he never identified them as trial exhibits on his Exhibit List and Epstein was not aware that he intended to rely on them at trial at the time of filing his Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy:

A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | +| 11. | ██████████ phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 14 | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection !
01/18/10 | 3, 4, 8 | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 24. | 2002 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 25. | 2001 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home (from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29) 1 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13. This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein 2 Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein | | +| | | 3,4, 10,S? | +| | | „ 14 | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Victim | , 6, 7, 8,14 | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report d | | +| | All reports and documentation generated by h | | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by c Police | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey E t 's rcraft and | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights key Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey E•frateeii | | +| | 7 berto Pinto regarding | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's ban tEments | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein tpreturns | | +| 56. | MC2 ' s inv communications of Jeffrey Epstein, | | +| | Je er, aritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc | | +| | B nel d Amanda Grant | | +| 57. | lea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | +| 58. | ranscript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4,13 | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department | | +| | Incident Report dated | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community | | + +| No. | | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 63. | | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, Document says | +| 65. | | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 1 document | +| | | provided • reflective | +| | | of d 'on) | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | 3, 12, 14 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler | | +| 69. | Palm Beach Police Department incident Report dated | 3, f f | +| 70. | | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorn- dat | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | y ated | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | tto ey dated | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assi | tat Attorney dated | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin | State Attorney dated | +| 75. | Letter from Goldbe r t | 22-06 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued | to Grand Jury 3, 4, 7, 8,13 | +| 77. | Documents rela | rthe rental of a vehicle for | +| | ? S" | | +| 78. | Itt -• Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey | | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | 3,4,7, 8 | +| 81. | Police report regarding | picking up money 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3,4, 7, 8, 10 | + +| No. | | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3,4,7, 8 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8 1 | +| 89. | Flight information for | 3, 4, 7 0, 1 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3 , 0, 11 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.ke Maria | 3, 8, 10, 12 | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | c , 4, 12 (document | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech | 3,4, 12 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to 1Crisher dated 5-1-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 95. | Police Report dat | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 96. | Victim's school records and . | np 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter | Vi ,(ZI1 09/03/08 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan ss | at Jeffrey Epstein's home 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 99. | Victim's Medical R | m Dr. Randee Speciale 3,4, 6,7, 8 | +| | 100. All surveillan | cted by law enforcement on Jeffrey | +| | Epstein' me | | +| | 101. Email | ived from Palm Beach Records related to | +| | Je n | | +| 102. | I | 'tem listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report 3, 4, 7, 8,12 (items not | +| | L • or Property Receipti | provided) | +| | copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| | 104. Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 109 reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not an exhibit | +| 110. reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his | Not an exhibit | +| 111. By listing an Exhibit, | is not waiving his right to Not an ex ibi | +| 112. All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to | N 'bit | +| 113. All pleadings and attachments in the actin n | r th | +| | 3, , 8, 12, 13 | +| 114. Motions for Summary Judgment, all a | c , | +| 116. All deposition testimony and discove | ses by | +| 117. All pleadings filed by Epstein | a bankruptcy | +| 118. All submissions by Epste | ection with the | +| 119. All Settlement Agre | en en Epstein and victims of | +| 120. Phone Journal | n from Epstein's home and produced to | +| the FBI by Alfr | odriguez | +| 121. Photo ep ing | Ghislaine Maxwell and 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| P • ce w | | +| 122. 1 logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 1 ails produced by Defendant and/or all emails | | +| 124. Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative | +| 126. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and | +| 127. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and 3, 4, 7, 13 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012 | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital re: Virginia Guiffre, 2001 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (signed by Matt Groening). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the Special Master | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Photo Virginia (Marla-Lago). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 137. | Color photo of [REDACTED] on ferry "New York" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Time Square | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 139. | [REDACTED] photo on back of ship | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 140. | Picture of room in New York | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 141. | Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 142. | Color photo of Virginia [REDACTED] at Zorro Ranch standing in front of gate sign with "Z" (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 143. | Virginia Roberts photo on horse front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 144. | Virginia Roberts photo standing against rocks (red coat) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 145. | Virginia [REDACTED] standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo [REDACTED]; back date). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 146. | Virginia [REDACTED] photo riding horse blue jacket far | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 147. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse hand up | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 148. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 149. | [REDACTED] photo outside next to tables | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 150. | [REDACTED] photo red coat leaning on rail | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 151. | photo standing outside next to fireplace | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 152. | photo standing in front of ranch | 3 4 7 8 | +| 153. | photo with hand over head(blacle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 154. | photo standing next to piand | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 155. | photo in front of fireplace(museum) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 156. | photo in front of wagon in museum | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 157. Color photo of | in front of museum | 3, 4 | +| 159. | (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2 | ,7, 8 | +| 160. Cover photo book 2 | | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 161. Scenic photo (with back photo | | 3 4 7 8 | +| 162. Scenic photo (with back photo | | 0,4, 7, 8 | +| 163. Scenic photo (with back photo whit | | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 164. Scenic photo (with back photo wifit | | 3,4,7,8 | +| 165. | steps wit head | 3 4 7 8 | +| 166. Scenic photo (with back photo | i ) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 167. Scenic photo (with back photoM) | | 3 4 7 8 | +| 168. Scenic photo | back photo | 3 4 7 8 | +| 169. Scenic | o back photo | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 170. S | • h with back photo and black) | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 171. c | oto (with back photo and black) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 1 is photo (with back photo | and black) | 3 4 7 8 | +| 173. | on steps with children (with back photd | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 174. | on street wall (far)Awith back | 3 4 7 8 | +| photo | and black). | | +| 175. Travel envelope | | 3,4,7,8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 177. | [Thailand Hotel Receipts] | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 178. | Court Docket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 179. | [Typed List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of [REDACTED] in Australia (Redacted) 03/17/11 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 185. | Airport Codes (Demonstrative) | 3, 7, 8, 10 | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk (Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (only photo of DVDs provided) | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 190. | Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 192. | Folder titled Sara Kellen: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 14 | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach Police Department | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections | +|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 199. Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol 11) 09/08/09 | 3 4 7 8 | +| 200. Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100 | 3, 4 | +| 201. Passport application; issued January 12, 2001 | 3 4 7 8 10 | +| 202. Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodrigud | 3, 4, 6,_Z | +| 203. Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguei | 3, 4, 6,3 | +| 204. Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodrigud | 3,4, 7, 8 | +| 205. Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planed | 3, 4,/ 0 | +| | 206. Photos of Jeffrey Epstein employees and former employed 3 S , 0 | +| 207. Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents' | 3 | +| 208. Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Pu | ' _, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 209. Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces TeQ | i r | +| 210. All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, | u | +| Produce and Responses, Requests for | sio and | +| 211. Any and all documents produced n | 's a ion. 12 | +| 212. Any and all depositions tak | ' ction. 12, 13 | +| 213. Any documents or oth | i ched to or used during | +| 214. Any and all exhibits, | ents, etc. referred to in any | +| 215. Any and all d | and exhibits designated by all | +| parties t is a | | +| 216. Any and | c exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | +| t i | | +| 217. an II pleadings filed in this action | 12,13 | +| 2 | and all records produced or that will be produced by | + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ocklAiw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(S• Sie• i r Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# **EXHIBIT B** + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +/ + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND + +A Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eloic, y files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter. + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All objectio +- 3. Irreleva C ceps thenticity atcrial +- 4. P value substantially outweighed by daIer of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Di [REDACTED] (5/25/11)
f. [REDACTED] Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney Wild (10/12/17) | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| | | | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements | | | + +#### L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Com laint | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Com laint | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | ialTaking Is Deposition and Subpoe | +| | | Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) Da | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Productio dant | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer§Il ye | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Seco A ed Complaint | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amend mt | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Sti ulation of Dismi reudice | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, d nscripts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes inclu mg, of limited to: | +| | | a. L.M. 9/2 10 | + +#### L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | C. et, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | | al ery and discovery responses | +| 31 | 7/24/0 | o • • Taint and Demand for Jury Trial | +| 32 | 7/2 | tipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice D.E. 21) | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +#### E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismiss' | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcript x b d | +| | | Ja v. of rey Epstein | +| | | USDC . ase No. 08-CV-80893 | +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all referenced therein and | +| | | all discovery an disco responses | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant tein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue | +| | | Action for' 4 ertain Based on Parallel Civil and | +| | | Cri n 1 Pro ings with Incorporated | +| | | M ndum of Law (D.E. 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | o e Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | +| | 4/9/09 | '. ' amtiffs Motion to Strike References to Non | +| | 4/17/09 | Plaintiffs First Amended , ip | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to | | | | +| | | Trump, Mark E . stein, Jean Luc | | | +| | | Bruhel, Michael Freidman, Rosalie | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | | | + +### Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated A • + +USDC S.D. Fia. Case No. 08-CV-801 + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA) + +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-C IV + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | + +#### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein 17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | + +#### In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
  1. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
  2. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
  3. [REDACTED] Adler (10/28/10).
| | | | + +#### United 1," f America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action DC Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 75 | 11/9/09 | V Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 76 | 11/23/09 | d Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| 77 | 11/2 | mended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | + +#### The Florida Bar Matters + +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against ██████ J. ██████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/1/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09 | E-mail from J. to Adler, | +| | 3:36 p.m. | William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | +| 118 | 7/13/09 | E-mail from Michele Dar an (Palm Beach Daily | +| | 2:28 p.m. | News) to J. 08404) | +| 119 | 7/4/09 | E-mail from J. to William J. | +| | 4:37 p.m. | Berger (022041_ | +| 120 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 1:17 p.m. | (04906) | +| 121 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:22 p.m. | (04905 | +| 122 | 7/18/09 | E-mail from J. Adler | +| | 4:10 p.m. | (01661 | +| 123 | 7/21/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Leone | +| | 8:21 p.m. | (01352 | +| 124 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from M J. to Michele n | +| | 11:22 a.m. | (01479) | +| 125 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradle | +| | 11:35 a.m. | (05803 | +| 126 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Jacquie to J. dwards | +| | 1:29 p.m. | (01662 | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter froliaJ. Edw noticing | +| 128 | 7/26/09 | E-mail from Priscila ju ento to Scott | +| | 5:28 p.m. | Rothstein, cc Amy and Adelita Cabello | +| 129 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from B to Susan Spencer | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Wendel (0 3) | +| 130 | 7/28/09 | E-mail fro n Spencer Wendel to J. | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Edw (03 70 | +| 131 | 7/28/09 | E- a m J. to Michele Dargan | +| 132 | 7/28/09 | -m it from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 10:004a.n.i._ | 48 | +| 133 | 7/29/014/ | , E-mail from Cam L. to | +| | 1:13 .m.' | 08420 | +| 134 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:47 m | 11075-11076 | +| 135 | 7/29/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:49 p.m. | (05852-05852 | +| 136 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (05535-0553.Q_ | +| 137 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (11320-11322) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat [REDACTED] and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02595-02596) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Nigel Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Jacquic | +| | 7:00 p.m. | | cc Mike FisteiS744 | | +| 202 | 10/14/09 | E-mail from | J. | to | +| | 7:39 a.m. | (03190 | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09 | E-mail from | | to J. | +| | 90/1 | a.m. (03189 | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09 | E-mail fr m | Adler to _J. | cc | +| | 10:42 a.m. | Jacquie | 01099. | | +| 205 | 10/14/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Mike Fisten, cc | +| | 12:20 p.m. | Jacquic | (01741) | | +| 206 | 10/16/09 | | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to | | +| | 5:29 a.m. | | Scott Rothsteia64,1 | | +| 207 | 10/19/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Ken Jenne | +| | 10:46 a.m. | (01704 | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09 | E-mail from | Rush to | J. Edw | +| | 1:01 .m. | 01433 | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09 | | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Roths | | +| 210 | 10/22/09 | E-mail from | J. | tek• to ohnson | +| | 11:52 a.m. | (01391) | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09 | E-mail from Jacquie | | o %Adler, Cara | +| | 2:52 p.m. | L. | Mike Fisten t | ael . Wheeler Marc | +| | | S. Nurik_William J. | e | dley J. | +| | | Barry J. =and | e | , cc Robert C. Buschel | +| 212 | 10/22/09 | E-mail from Jac | ' J | on to J. | +| | 4:10 p.m. | | Marc S. Nurik, Mic ael J. Wheeler Cam L. | | +| | | | Willialta Berger, | Adler and | +| | | Rob | Thischel (01307) | | +| 213 | 10/26/09 | E-ifia | om William J. SE | tgr to Pat Caner and | +| | 7:46 a.m. | cy . | cc = | and Jacquie | +| 214 | 10/2 | - ail from Pat) | aMt | J. (01623) | +| 215 | 10/30/09 | E-mail from Debra | | to Scott Rothstein | +| | 10:01 a.m. | (26304-26305 | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09 | E-mail from | | Adler to Jacquic and | +| | 10:03 a.m. | J. | (01625) | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | | Contract for Services between Sear | iainn ii= | +| | | | Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and | J. | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] Attorneys/id/3/read) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 233 5/14/13 The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad | | +| (httpi/ | • naltriallawyers.org/profile | +| view/B | 4409/) | +| 234 5/14/13 La is.com website information for | J. | +| J | 3489098-a/) | +| 235 10/30/04 Kubicld Dra cr's website attorney information for | | +| 236 10/30/05 Kubicki Dra | website attorney information for | +| 237 The American Registry Website rintouts of | | +| reco nitions received b | J. | +| 238 5/7/12 Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| 239 1/16/13 Jaffe, Weissing, | & | +| (http://www.abuseandassault | Ab Under | +| 240 1/16/13 Jaffe, Weis= | , Fistos & | +| Lehrman, P.L.'s we | to n | +| (htip://www.pathto" | media-center/press | +| 241 5/14/13 Jaffe, W | Fistos & | +| Lehrman, | website printout | +| htt ://wtvw | ndassault.com/Abuse Home | +| 242 5/14/13 F: r, Jaff | Weissing, Fistos & | +| Le ., P.L.'s website printout | | +| (Mimi/ | abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notabl | +| 243 5/1443 | | +| Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| iI.UZJ0PpWT0X0 | III | +| 244 Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| 245 Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| Brad | with referenced articles | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | ██████ Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of 'Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; ██████ James ██████; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-██████ | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; ██████ James ██████; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-██████ | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | + +### .e s + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 287 | Misc. | All public records, news articles and prior testimony of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog — Rothstein | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. ChiefJudge: | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all mat | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victi al | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, d | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared documents | +| 327 | | All foundation exhili | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and i exhibits | +| 329 | | Demonstrative a an ibits including, but not | +| | | limited to, charts, nes, diagrams, models, | +| | | surveys, p phs and blow-ups | +| 330 | | All newt red documents/exhibits | +| | | An d all = ibits listed by J. | +| | | wa ng is right to object to any of | + +PlaintifVC unter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ock9tw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been finished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +(SS E Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

| | + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800=MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +A + +SFCATR Ulna s jatividually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +COSA + +#### EFBIIiDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-D AMENDE T LIST + +vs. + +Plaintiff, + +Defendants. + +J. by and through his erst ed counsel, files his Objections to Counter- + +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Amended E b' • 'dated November 16, 2017, as follows: + +- 0. No Objecti LAII o +- 2. ns, except authenticity 3.Irltlevant or immaterial +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence + +### INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, J. Edwards and L.M.
15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | 0 | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | 0 | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of J. [REDACTED] | 0 | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | 0 | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | 1 | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. Edwards (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas [REDACTED] Discala (5/25/11)
f. Dean Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney [REDACTED] (10/12/17) | 2 | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | 2 | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | 1 | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | 1 | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | 1 | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15 th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|--------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | 1 | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and | | | + +#### L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein 1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | 1 | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | Ci | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | No ices | Deposition and Su | +| | | (1) Paul Visoski, Jr. an | vt' | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Produ i | to fendant 2 | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Ans | A r illative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's | mended Complaint | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third | did plaint 2 | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Di | th Prejudice 2 | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, d | iti n transcripts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes includi | , ut not limited to: | +| | | a. L | /09; 2/9/10) | + +| USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--|--| +| 30 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 2 | | | +| 31 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | 0 | | | +| 32 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | 2 | | | + +#### L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S .D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +#### E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | 0 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection Marked | +|------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | 0 | +| 39 , | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to | | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | 0 | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismi sir‘ | | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcri | e its and | +| | | a. E.W. (5/6/10) | | + +#### e v. Jeffrey Epstein USD . la. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | | Court docket, all ourt r gs referenced therein and | +|----|---------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| | | all discovery an | ' ery responses | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint | E. I) 0 | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant | 's Motion to Stay and/or | +| | | Co | e Ac • n for Time Certain Based on Parallel | +| | | C' '1 | Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated | +| | | o | dum of Law (D.E. 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | N of | of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | +| 52 | 4/9/0 | | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) 0 | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | 0 | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | + +***Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)*** +**USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119** + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | 0 | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | 0 | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | 0 | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | 0 | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | + +***Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)*** +**USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV** + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | 0 | | | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
b. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
c. Russell Adler (10/28/10). | 1 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], William Berger and Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against James [REDACTED]; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | 0 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | 1 | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | 1 | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | 1 | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | 1 | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendell (01449) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | 1 | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | 1 | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | 1 | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05239) | 1 | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | 1 | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | 1 | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | 1 | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | 1 | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | 1 | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | 1 | | | +| 119 | 7/4/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | 1 | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05803) | 1 | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (01662) | 1 | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. Edwards re cross noticing depositions | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | 1 | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (03070) | 1 | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | 1 | | | +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | 1 | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | 1 | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | 1 | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | 1 | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | 1 | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | 1 | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (06959-06960) | 1 | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | 1 | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | 1 | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | 1 | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | 1 | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat [REDACTED] and Mike Fisten (01376) | 1 | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | 1 | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02595-02596) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | 1 | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | 1 | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | 1 | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff
(07647) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | 1 | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07674-07675) | 1 | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | 1 | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | 1 | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | 1 | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff
(07686-07688) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | 1 | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | 1 | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | 1 | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | 1 | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | 1 | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04321) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04318-04319) | 1 | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (10586-10589) | 1 | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | 1 | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff (06789) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06788) | 1 | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita [REDACTED] (19986-19987) | 1 | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Nigel Rosser (06191) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | 1 | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | 1 | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | 1 | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | 1 | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | 1 | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | 1 | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | 1 | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | 1 | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | 1 | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | 1 | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | 1 | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | 1 | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | 1 | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | 1 | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | 1 | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 2 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | 0 | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | 2 | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | 2 | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 098308 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier [REDACTED] man, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/ Robert-d-critton-jr/) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] white.com/Attorneys/id/3/read) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. Edwards | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | 3, 4, 8 | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL& | 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | 7, 8 | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED]
( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-website-attorney-information-for-brad-[REDACTED] ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press-[REDACTED] ) | 7, 8 | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail. Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | 0 | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | 0 | | | +| | | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | 0 | | | +| | | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | 0 | | | +| | | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | 0 | | | +| | | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NBC News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | 0 | | | +| | | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | 0 | | | +| | | Court and arrest information; James Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA- | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; James Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA- | 1 | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; James Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX- | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | 1 | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | 1 | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Bradley J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11- | 1 | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | 1 | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | 1 | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | 1 | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | 1 | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | 1 | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | 1 | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | 1 | | | + +#### Experts + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | | Dr. Bernard J. Janse ' | xpep Report | +|-----|----------|---------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents | uc | or relied upon or | +| | | referenced by | | and J. Jansen in preparing | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | | | | +| | | Expert Wit | | eport of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in | +| | | Vir ' a Giu | | e v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Sup | ental Expert Witness Re | of Dr. | +| | | feernar | . Jansen in | v. Ghislaine | +| 287 | ' | | | 11 public records, news articles and prior testimony | + +### Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------|------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog— Rothstein | 3, 4, 7.8 | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Cleared by the Florida Bar | | | | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | | | | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | | | | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | 0 | | | +| | | Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | | | | +| | | | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Bradley J. [REDACTED] and any witnesses listed by either party | 1 | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all [REDACTED] letters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | 1 | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | 1 | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | 1 | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | 1 | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | 1 | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | 1 | | | +| | | 330 | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | 1 | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of [REDACTED] exhibits introduced at trial) | 1 | | | + +Plaintiffitounter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 12th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +David P. Vitale Jr. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +# EXHIBIT C + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800MaMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +Cos + +#### SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. ED ;llW and through his undersigned attorneys, + +hereby supplements his list of witnesses trial follows: + +#### WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED + +- 1. J. Ed 2.. Jeffrey E +- 3. +- 5. ep enson + - W. Peachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 2 of 22 + +6. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq. +Mintz & Gold LLP +600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, +New York 10016 + +7. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq. +Mintz & Gold LLP +600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, +New York, 10016 + +8. + +[REDACTED] + +9. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +10. + +Robert C. Josefsberg, Esquire +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +11. + +Detective [REDACTED] Recarey +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +12. + +Chief Michael Reiter +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +13. + +John Connolly +c/o [REDACTED] & Schuster +1230 6th Avenue +New York, New York 10020 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 3 of 22 + +- 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 +- 16. Antonio (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida +- 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 18. Records Custodian of Unit for the Southern District S? 4V:rimy's Office +- 19. Records Custodi eral Bureau of Investigations +- 20. Spencer Kuvin, 1800 S. A tmlian venue, #400 West Palm Florida 33409 +22. Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor New York, NY 10017 +- 21. re Leopold, Esquire Istein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +.a .c 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +DV. EPSTEIN + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M.1\_ + +Page 4 of 22 + +- 24. Isidro M. = Esquire =Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O'' +- 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +- 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 'Ci4v West Palm Beach, FL 33409 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +### WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES + +- 28. Adrian Mucins a C. 1040 South Sho Miami Beach. FL 33 141 +- 29. Land6h Thotyias York Times th Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022 +- 31. Lawrence LaVecchio United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 5 of 22 + +32. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +33. Evgenia Ignatieva +1650 Broadway, #910 +New York, NY 10019 + +34. [REDACTED] + +35. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +36. [REDACTED] +c/o Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +37. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +38. Brandy Brenson +c/o Spencer Kuvin +1800 South Australian Ave #400 +West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +39. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +41. William Scherer, Esquire 633 S Federal Hwy #800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 9 + +43. 4 1 do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 4:) Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 , 425 North Andrews Avenue, SSui + +44. + +45. do Robe C JoseTh5erg, Esq. Podhurst PA One . . 3 venue, Suite 2700 Is( • FL 3131 + +46. tobert C. Josefsberg, Esq. odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3r° Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +47. ic olle.Pesberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +-ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 7 of 22 + +- 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edwards Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW1A 1 AA +- 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown +- 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 +- 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, F 934gt a mir St +- 53. +- 54. do Adam Horo Horowitz 425 North Fort le FL 33301 Avenue, Suite 2 obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. A711\ n urst Orseck, PA e S.E. rAvenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 +- 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 8 of 22 + +56. + +do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +57. + +do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3"I Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480 + +59. + +60. + +do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131 + +do Robert C. Jo Podhurst Orsec One S.E. 3r Aven ,'Suite 2700 Miami, FL + +pe er Kuvin South Australian Ave #400 t Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 + +do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128 + +63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW r d AVE., Miami, FL 33169 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 9 of 22 + +64. + +[REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +65. + +[REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +66. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +67. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +68. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +69. + +Nezbitt Kurkendall +Federal Bureau of Investigation +16320 NW 2nd Ave. +Miami, FL 33169 + +70. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Isidro M. [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A. +224 Datura Street, Suite 900 +West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page IO of 22 + +71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown + +72. Address Currently Unknown + +73. 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021 + +74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +CO ' + +75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ti + +76. + +77. Any additional indj Office and who supplied as it re entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA. + +78. Leslie W imit Parkway C us, Ohio 43206 + +79 dent Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 + +80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401 + +81. Mari tza Vasquez 1293 SW 215` Terrace Miami, FL 33145 + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 11 of 22 + +1. 82. Maximilia [REDACTED] + c/o William Unroch, Esquire + 140 West End, Apt. 30-BW + New York, NY 10023 +2. 83. [REDACTED] + c/o Spencer Kuvin + 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +3. 84. [REDACTED] + 2915 Share Rd. 111 + Tallahassee, FL 31312 +4. 85. [REDACTED] + c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + Podhurst Orseck, PA + One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 + Miami, FL 33131 +5. 86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin) + 11675 Glowing Sunset Lane + Las Vegas, NV 89135 +6. 87. [REDACTED] +7. 88. Michael Fisten + Weston, FL +8. 89. Russell Adler + Delray Beach, FL +9. 90. [REDACTED] Alessi + 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. + Boynton Beach, FL 33472 +10. 91. Janusz Banasiak + 358 El Brillo Way + Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 12 of 22 + +92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472 + +94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942 + +96. Rosalie Freedman 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253 + +97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently + +98. + +99. , South Africa + +nn Dubin 040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137 + +101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206 + +102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road + +J. + +COSA + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff + +Page 13 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +103. Officer Minot +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +104. Sgt. Sorge +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +105. [REDACTED] +Address Currently Unknown + +106. [REDACTED] Pagnano +1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +107. Stephan Kosslyn +28 Garfield Street +Cambridge, [REDACTED] 02138-1802 + +108. Cecile Dejongh +23 S Estate Mafolie +St. [REDACTED] VI 00802 + +109. Tommy Mottola +302 Caribbean Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480-3012 + +110. Mike Sanka +449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101 +Beverly Hills, CA 90212 + +111. [REDACTED] + +112. William "Bill" [REDACTED] +5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391 +Coral Springs, FL 33076 + +MIIMADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XX)OCMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. + +Page 14 of 22 + +- 113. Howard Rubenstein 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 +- 114. Robert Meister 101 Seminole Ave. Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 115. Todd Meister 101 Seminole Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480 +- 116. President William J. Clinton +- 117. William Hammond 2965 Fontana Place Palm Beach, FL +- 118. Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, #250 West Palm Beach, Flori +- 119. Michele Pagan Palm Beach Pol. 345 South Coun Palm Beach FL 3 0 +- 120. Mic e Da P each Police Department o County Road Beach, FL 33480 ent my Fortimer 12309 North Old Country Road Wellington, FL 33414 + +122. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Page 15 of 22 + +123. [REDACTED] + +124. [REDACTED] + +125. [REDACTED] + +126. Latasha Lowe +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 + +127. [REDACTED] + +128. Zack Bryan +1150 Larch Way +Wellington, Florida + +129. [REDACTED] + +130. Larry Morrison +11148 Cobblefield Dr.. +Wellington, FL 33449 + +131. Story Cowles +801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +132. Michael Dawson +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Page 16 of 22 + +- 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134 +- 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101 +- 135. Sergia Cordero 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131 +- 136. Cassandra Rivera 5011 El Clain Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415 +- 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3 +- 138. +- 139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown +- 140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown +- 141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 +- 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown +- 143. Amazon Records Custodian +- 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +.1. DV. EPSTEIN 009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff a. + +Page 17 of 22 + +- 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +- 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +- 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL +- 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian O 'S A 3344 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite C-I24 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 C.) +- 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 150. Wellington Regina! Hospital Reco 10104 Forrest Hill Blvd. Wellington, FL 33414 S\,, +- 151. All witnesses that Defer hav listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff. +- 152. All rebuttal wi +- 153. All Peopl n Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +### WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION + +- 155. Epstein andam Street ew York, NY 10013 lo A +- 156. +- 157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +DV. EPSTEIN No.: t009CA040800:OOCXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. Page 18 of 22 + +> do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL + +- 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +- 159. Jeffrey Epstein + +- 160. Horowitz Law do Adam Horo witz. 425 Noth Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 \ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 EXPER"SSSES + +- 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Sc art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac lvd. West Palm Beac 3409 + +CO + +The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di t he prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +162.N scert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131 + +- 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +- 167. Isidro M. Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +- 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire S ue 1600 Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL +- 169. William Berger, Weiss, Handler, I, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, uite 218A Boca Rato 33431 +- 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +- 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 A(Iptc Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +- 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 "S C) + +Plaintiff reserves 44 ght / to amend this list. + +l ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. + +Page 19 of 22 + +O ' + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Page 20 of 22 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA COPY + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff + +Page 21 of 22 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J. + +Page 22 of 22 + +J. M, Esquire + +staff efile@pathtojusticomn + +Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 A"\' tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com CO 'S Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 5) ? ' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)467-1223 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +# EXHIBIT D + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifKounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND 'REY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED TRIA\ N S LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jefficy (Mein files this Amended Trial Witness List as + +follows: + +- do 425 N. Andrews Fort Laud ue, Suite 2 L 33301-3268 +- 2. ein Nurik Offices of Marc S. Nurik + - E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + - t. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 3. L. Ackerman, Jr. c/o IM Burnett 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +- 4. William J. Berger do Greenspoon Marder 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 11800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 5. Jonathan Birkman do Quraishi & Birkman, PLLC 809 S.E. Eighth Street Deerfield Beach, FL 33441-5608 +- 6. Wayne Black do Wayne Black & Associates One Brickell Square 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33131 +- 7. W. Chester Jr. do W. Chester Jr., P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 c West Palm Beach, FL 33401 100 S.E. Third Avenue , Suit 0 +- 8. Robert C. Buschel do Buschel Gibbons, P.A. 4 One Financial Plaza Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 +- 9. Paul G. Cassell do Hatch, Jam ge, P.C. 10 West Broadw , ite 400 Salt Lake T 84101 +- 10. d Coleman Haddad, P.A. . Seventh Street, Suite 301 uderdale, FL 33301 IL Robert D. Critton, Jr. do Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 12. Pasquale Pat) do Pat = & Associates, Inc. 2893 Executive Park Drive, Suite 204 Weston, FL 33331 + +- 13. Abraxas (A.J.) Discala Address Unknown +- 14. Jane Doe do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +- 15. Mercedes Address Unknown +- 16. Gary M. l Jr. do Gary M. Jr., P.A. 4420 N.E. 24 Avenue Lighthouse Point, FL 33064-7209 +- 17. Michael Fisten do Blue Line Investigative Solutions 3389 Sheridan Street, Suite 515 Hollywood, FL 33021 +- 18. Christina Fitch Address Unknown +- 19. Shawn Gilbert Address Unknown +- 20. Scott A. Golds do The Law O f Scott , P.A. 1880 N. Avenue, Suite 315 Boyrgpn B ch, FL 33426-8678 +- 21. olmes ISheridan St., #129 uderdale, FL 33331-3486 Steven R. Jaffe do Upchurch & Max 900 S. Pine Island Road, Suite 410 Plantation, FL 33324-3922 +- 23. Rodney J. Janis do Goldberg Segalla LLP 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6148 + +- 24. Kenneth C. Jenne Address Unknown +- 25. Jacquie Address Unknown +- 26. Denis A. Kleinfeld do Kleinfeld Legal Advisors, P.A. 801 N.E. 1676 Street, Suite 306 North Miami Beach, FL 33162-3729 +- 27. E. Knight do Burnett O 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 2833 N.E. 35th Court +- 28. It Kretschmar do Soaring Eagle Investments, LLC Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308 +- 29. Seth M. Lehrman do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue S , Fort Lauderdale, FL 3 +- 30. Michael Legam do Legamaro B ipal iP 123 Wacker Driv ite 1400 Chicago, +- 31. G nknown +- 32. les H. Lichtman o Berger Singerman LLP 350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-4215 +- 33. Carl H. Linder do Greenspoon Marder 600 Brickell Ave., Suite 3600 Miami, FL 33131-3073 + +AO.A + +"S 94A) + +- 34. Mark T. Luttier do Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 35. L.M. do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +- 36. Maribel Matiska Address Unknown 4. 41mc +- 37. Priscilla Nascimento Address Unknown CO ' +- 38. Marc S. Nurik do Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 39. Michael J. Pike do Pike & Lustig, LLP 2465 Mercer Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33 +- 40. Preve Address Unknot +- 41. Thane Ritchie do Ritchi Addr- UnYno +- 42. berts lue Line Investigative Solutions + Sheridan Street, Suite 515 ollywood, FL 33021 I Management + - 43. David Rogers 7318 Easton Drive Lake Worth, FL 33167 + - 44. Alan B. Sakowitz do Pointe Development Company 1135 Kane Concourse, Floor 3 Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025 + +,S ) + +- 45. Lilly Ann do The LS Law Firm Four Seasons Tower, Suite 1200 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131-3439 +- 46. Jack Scarola do Searcy Denney Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +- 47. William It Scherer do Conrad & Scherer, LLP 633 S. Federal Highway, Suite 800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 48. Jack Simony do Platinum Partners New York, NY +- 49. Susan K. Stirling do Promise Healthcare, Inc. 999 N.W. 51° Street Boca Raton, FL 33431 +- 50. Barry J. 6615 E. Liseron Boynton Beach, L 3437-6481 +- 51. Debra Vil Addrtss U +- 52. ski Pine Point Road ra Beach, FL 33404 +- 53. Linda Von Allmon Address Unknown +- 54. F.. W. c/o Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +- 55. Beth Williamson Address Unknown +- 56. Ronald Wise Address Unknown +- 57. Phaedra Xanthos, CPA, CFE 3762 Riverland Road Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 +- 58. An and witnesses listed by in case in chief. +- J. M, depending o estimony + +### REBUTTAL WITNESSE1 + +O 'S + +- 59. Katherine W. Ezell 4905 S.W. 71' Place Miami, FL 33155-5605 +- 60. Allan M. Garten "S C) 28183 S. Barlow Road Aurora, OR 97002-9321 +- 61. Adam D. Horowitz ?S' do Horowitz Law 425 N. Andrews A e 2 Fort Lauderdale -3268 +- 62. Amy Josefsbergc/o Miami tate Attorney's Office 1350 .W. m Avenue Mini, FL 136-2102 +- 63. Ro. rt C. Josefsberg ÷ odhurst Orseck, P.A. unTrust International Center One S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131-1715 + - 64. Stuart S. Mermeistein do Herman Law Firm, P.A. 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 540 Boca Raton, FL 33486-1018 + +- 65. Richard H. Willits do Richard H. Willits P.A. 490 Wandering Way Ponte Vedra, FL 32081-0619 +- 66. Iliaparz al do M= Burnett, P.A. Brickell Arch 1395 Brickell Avenue, Floor 14 Miami, FL 33131-3371 +- 67. My and all witnesses whose names appear in depositions documents produced in response to requests for Droduction depending on the testimony in case in + +#### EXPERT WITNESS + +- 68. D. Culver Skip) Ill Telephone: 598-6800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Culver III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 64 + +Subject Matter: Mr. w \ tify Isto legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause and professional r tion. + +Substance of the F available before the pendency o inions: The pleadings and information that was I civil proceeding was initiated and discovered during nal civil proceeding and deposition testimony. + +Summary opini unds for Each Opinion: Mr. has not reached his final + +: A copy of Mr. Curricula Vitae is attached as Exhibit A. + +reserves the right to list and/or call any and all newly discovered witnesses upon proper no e and to call and/or produce any and all additional witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal. Epstein reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this Witness List upon proper notice to the parties and the Court. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: T +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +mep@scarcylaw.com +jsx@scarcylaw.com +scarolateam@scarcylaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +J. + +Nichole J. Segal +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +### D. Culver 111 CURRICULUM VITAE + +CULVER III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 www.culversmithlaw.com + +ofc 561.598.6800 lax 561.598.6801 cell 561.301.3800 csmithgculverscnithlaw.com + +#### OCCUPATION/PROFESSION + +Lawyer and consultant + +Practice emphasis: Counseling and representation of lawyers, law firms, and others on-ethics, professional responsibility, professional disciplinary proceedings, sanctions, disqualification, unlicensed practice of law, malpractice, and loss prevention; service as expert witness in litigation involving such matters; conduct of ethics audits for law firms; counseling and representation of applicants for admission or reinstatement to the bar; counseling and representation of public officials and employees on ethics compliance and complaints; conduct of internal corporate investigations; service as special magistrate, arbitrator, and mediator; representation and consultation on appeals in all courts. More than forty-five years of experience in the field, as well as experience in law-firm management. + +#### EXPERIENCE 'S di 9 + +Counsel for respondents in hundreds of lawyeetattplcry, ACi hr unlicensed-practice-of-law, and baradmission proceedings, including appeals In the Supreme Court of Florida + +Representation in dozens of disqualific o nd sanctions proceedings + +Testifying/consulting expert in nurtlerpus,cases involving lawyer ethics and professionalresponsibility issues + +Wide variety of civil litigation Ltd apbeals, including matters involving contracts, business torts, professional responsibility and malpractice, corporate and partnership relationships, officer and director liability, and, trust and estate disputes. + +#### EDUCATION AND LICENSING + +Bachelor of Arts, Washington and Lee University, 1964 + +Doctor of Jurisprudence, Washington and Lee University College of Law, 1969 (replaced LLB. conferred 1967) + +Admitted to practice in: + +Florida, 1967 + +California, 1972 (now inactive) + +U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida + +U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit + +#### PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY + +Law Clerk to Judge T. Shannon, Jr., and Judge Robert T. S District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, 1967-1968 (summarized briefs and records-on-appeal, researched law, drafted opinions) Associate, S S Paine & S P.A., West Palm Beach, 1968 (associate in midsize law firm for four months before commencing active military duty; researched law, drafted pleadings and briefs, conducted depositions, and handled motion hearings) Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Naval Reserve, 1968-1972 (active duty as military lawyer: two years at Naval Law Center, San Diego, CA, prosecuting and defending courts-martial cases; two years as staff judge advocate at Naval Air Station Miramar ("Ffghtertown U.S.A."), San Diego, CA, advising commanding officer on wide variety of military and Civilian legal matters) Associate, John W. Dell, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1972-1974 (associate In small, general-practice law firm; handled various litigation and nonlitigation matters) Shareholder, Dell and S P.A., West Palm Beach, 1974-1977 (shareholder in small, generalpractice law firm; handled various litigation matters, it Cu ing personal-injury and commercial cases) Shareholder, Coogler, P.A.,4/est Im Beach, 1977-1981 (shareholder in small-to-midsize insurance-defense firm; handled defense of personal-injury, product-liability, and professional-malpractice cases) Partner, Steel Hector & S LLP, West Palm Beach, 1981-1991 (senior litigator in large, Miamibased law firm's West Palm Beach office; chaired office litigation department; recruited, trained, and supervised litigation associates and legal assistants; handled wide variety of complex civil business litigation, professional-malpractice cases, and probate litigation) Shareholder, S S Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1992-1997 (shareholder in midsize general-practice law nrm; handled wide variety of civil business litigation and probate litigation) Partner, Holland & Knight LLP, West Palm Beach, 1997-2002 (senior litigator in international law firm's West Palm Beach office; handled wide variety of civil business litigation, probate litigation, and appeals; served as office Executive Partner, 1998-2002) Shareholder, D, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2002-2007 trial and appellate practice; -subst:intial focus on lawyer ethics and professional responsibility) Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm Beach, 2007-2010 (senior litigator in national law firm's West Palm Beach office) Shareholder, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2010—date legal and consulting practice; substantial focus on ethics, professional responsibility, and related matters; appellate representation and consultation) + +## PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE The Florida Bar: 2006-2007) 1989-1992) Member, Ethics 2000 Review Panel, 2001 + +Member, Board of Governors, 1984-1988 (Executive Committee, 1987-1988) + +Member, Professional Ethics Committee, 2001-2007,2010-2016 (Chairperson, 2004-2005, + +Member, Vision 2016 Commission, 2013-2016 (Chairperson, MJP/Reciprocity- a e us Committee, Bar Admissions Subgroup, 2013-2016) + +Member, Standing Committee on Professionalism, 1989-1993, 2016—d e hairperson, + +Member, Hawkins Commission on Discipline System, 2011-2012 + +Member, Special Committee to Review 2002 ABA Model RyF s, 02-2006 + +Member, Law-Related Education Committee, 2007-4\ 0 1 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1987-1989,, 992-2001 (Chairperson, 1988-1989, 1993-1994) (author/editor of Meeting the Challenges: A Strategic Plan for the Florida Bar, 1993) + +Member, Special Committee to Study Composition of Board of Governors, 1996-1997 + +Vice Chairperson, Commission on Lawyer Professionalism, 1987-1989 (principal author of Florida Bar Ideals and Goals of Professionalism and Florida Lawyer's Creed of Professionalism (adopted 1990, superseded 2015)) + +Chairperson, Special Committee on Priorities for the 1990s, 1986-1987 + +Member, Special Committee to Study Reapportionment of the Board of Governors, 1986-1987 (author of The Florida Bar's answer and counterpetition in Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules lie luting the Florida Bar (Reapportionment), 518 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1987) (adopting Flo ' a roposed plan for apportionment of Board of Governors)) + +M , Pr gram Evaluation Committee, 1984-1988 (Chairperson, 1986-1988) + +Chair son, Special Study Committee on Lawyer Referral Services, 1985-1986 + +Member, Special Study Committee on Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 1983-1984 + +Member, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee, 1977-1980 (Chairperson, 1979-1980) + +Member, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, 1974-1979 + +Member, Trial Lawyers Section and Appellate Practice Section + +#### Palm Beach County Bar Association: + +President, 1982-1983 + +President-Elect, 1981-1982 + +Secretary, 1979-1981 + +Member, Board of Directors, 1977-1984 + +President, Young Lawyers Section, 1976-1977 + +Member, Professionalism Committee, 1990-1991, 2004-date (Co-Chair n, 2 -2012) + +Member,. & Small Firm Practitioners Committee, 2011-2012 + +Member, Judicial Campaign Practices Commission, 2002,2004,700 , 2012,2014, 2016 + +Member, Historical Committee, 2003-2009 (Chairperson,\_2003-2005,2006-2009) + +Member, Historic Courtroom Fundraising Committee, 2007-2008 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1994-1996,2001-2002 + +Member, Revitalization of the Bar Committee, 1999-2000 + +Chairperson, Bulletin Editorial Committee, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Circuit Court Civil Practfetemmittee N , 1979 + +Chairperson, New Member Orietitition Committee, 1976-1977 + +Chairperson, Membership Comm 1974-1976 + +#### American College of Trial Law ters:\_,/ + +Fellow, 1996-date + +Membernlorida State Committee, 2004-2009 + +Member, Legal Ethics and Professionalism Committee (f/k/a Legal Ethics Committee), 1997- 2002,2005-2013 + +tik?frperson, 2008 Tri-State Meeting Committee, 2006-2008 + +#### Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers: + +Member, 2005—date + +Member, Program Committee, 2006, 2008-2010, 2014—date (Chairperson, 2008-2010) + +#### Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers: + +Charter member, 2009—date (member, Board of Directors, 2009—date) + +#### American Bar Association: + +Member, Center for Professional Responsibility + +Member, Section of Litigation + +#### The Florida Bar Foundation: + +Member, Board of Directors, 1988-1992 (Executive Committee, 1990-1 + +Member, Development Committee, 1995-1996,2000-2005 + +Member, Improvements in the Administration of Justice IOTA GrantEComdtittee, om ittee, 1992-1994, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Investment Committee, 1991-1992 + +Vice Chairperson, Law Student Assistance IOTA Grant Committee, 1990-1992 + +Member, Legal Assistance for the Poor IOTA GrantCoMmittee, 1988-1991 + +Chairperson, 2004 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +Member, Steering Committee, 2010 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +#### Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc. + +Member, Board of Directors, 2011-2016 + +#### Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc. + +Member, Board;of Directors, 2016—date + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Committee, 1992-1996 (Chairperson, 1994- 1995) ( + +Chairperson, Ad'Hoc Magistrate Selection Panel, United States District Court, Southern District of FloAfir1987 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Media Committee, 2005-2009 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Indigent Services Committee, 2007-2008 + +#### PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1987 + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1994 + +Professionalism Award, Palm Beach County Bar Association, 2002 + +Outstanding Past Local Bar President, Florida Council of Bar Presidents, 2005 + +#### LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS + +"The Pink Elephant in the Office," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullets S per 2017, pp. 19, 22 + +"Earned Fees to Be Shared Between Counsel—Operating Account or T st Account?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2017, p. 5 + +"The New 'Florida Bar Professionalism Expectations'—What N Association Bulletin, January 2016, p. 5 lm Beach County Bar + +"The Monster in the Closet: Trust-Account Responsibilit " Bulletin, February 2015, p. 9 A each County Bar Association + +"'Unprofessional' Versus 'Unethical' (Caution: Itpnery toad Ahead)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2014, p. + +"The Supreme Court's New 'Code for Resolving fessionalism Complaints," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July/August 2O13,p. 6 + +\ "Motions to Withdraw: Euphewnsrn on Parade," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2012, p. 11 ( k/ + +'Tribute to a Mentor," Palm Bettaitounty Bar Association Bulletin, April 2012, p. 10 + +"Can You Hear Me Nov?)ndSho Else Is Listening?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2011,-p. 19 + +Code of Pretrial and Trial Conduct Teaching Syllabus, American College of Trial Lawyers, Irvine, 2011 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Dance of the Lawyer Expert: What Ethical Issues and When?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, September 2010, p. 13 + +"Through the Looking When Is an 'Earned Retainer' Earned?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2009, p. 7 + +"Terminal One-Upmanship and Other Phenomena of the Lawyering Life," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2009, p. 7 + +"Threatening Disciplinary Proceedings: In the Mind of the Beholder?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2007, p. 13 + +"Outsourcing Legal Work: Smart Practice Management or Ethical Quagmire?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, April 2007, p. 13 + +"Lawyers' Ancillary Businesses," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, March 2007, p. 13 + +"The Adversary System: A Matter of Theology?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2006, p. 13 + +"Investigators Gone Who Pays the Tab in a Blame-the-Lawyers World?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Metadata: What Are the Ethical Implications?" Palm Beach County Bar Association-Bulletin, June 2006, p. 7 + +Chapter 1, "Theories of Liability," Professional Liability of Lawyers in Flori a th e ., the Florida Bar, Tallahassee, 2006, (also authored same chapter in earlier editions) + +"Business Transactions With a Client: Are You a Lawyer or an Entre ren Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2005, p. 17 + +"Identifying the Client: The First Line of Defense," Palm Bep Co Bar Association Bulletin, January 2005, pp. 15-16 + +"Confidentiality and the 'Snitch Rule': An Ethical C Bulletin, December 2004 Im Beach County Bar Association + +Report of the Legal Ethics Committee of the American College of Trial Lawyers on Duties of Confidentiality, American College of al Lawyers, Irvine, CA, 2001 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Bar Looks at the Future," The F Journal, vol. 71, no. 5, May 1997, p. 32 + +#### LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS + +"Professionalism Expectations and Contentious Cases," at Palm Beach County Bar Association LLC Member Disputes seminar, West Palm Beach, June 16, 2017 + +"Professionalis%N)-at Palm Beach County Bar Association Modification of Parenting Plans: Seven Practical Tips Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 28, 2017 + +"Great Exgiectations: Professionalism Expectations for Florida Lawyers," at The Florida Bar Putting the "ratio ifrofessionalism symposium, West Palm Beach, April 21, 2017 (panelist) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 2: Permissible Lawyer-Expert Testimony—What Can You Get Into Evidence?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, August 1, 2015 (moderator) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 1," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Houston, February 7, 2015 (moderator) + +"Ethical Considerations: Your License Is in Play," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Spying Spouses: Divorce in a World of Cyber Warfare and E-Everything seminar, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2013 + +"The Tangled Web of Ethics, Advertising, Websites & Social Media," at The Florida Bar Family Law Section webinar, September 11, 2013 (panelist) + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With Lawyer-Referral and Legal Support Services," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 22, 2012 (including written materials) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, May 2, 2012 (panelist) + +"Ethics Workshop," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Islan bruary 10, 2012 (panelist) + +"The New Oath of Admission," at Florida Association for Women Lawyers Pal Chapter luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 9, 2011 (panelist) Act iCounty + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With For-Profit Referral and Legal-Sup s," at Palm Beach County Bar Association. & Small Firm Practitioners luncheon, st ealm Beach, November 2, 2011 + +"Lawyer Ancillary Business: What Hat Are You Wearing Today—Lawyer or Entrepreneur?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meejir > Sianrancisco, August 6, 2010 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lormart-Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including written materials) + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including-Titten materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (includingventen materials) + +"Commercial Litigation," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Bench-Bar Conference, West Palm Beach, February 19, 2010 (panelist) + +"Ripped From the Case Er Corporate Internal Investigations, Multiple Representations, and U.S. v. Ruehle," at Arnerican'iBankruptcy Institute Caribbean Insolvency Symposium, Boca Raton, February 14291'.1(panelist and counsel for Appellee in mock oral argument) + +"Ethics an Pro The Rothstein Scandal & Beyond," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program Leadership luncheon Series, Coral Gables, January 26, 2010 (panelist) + +"Evidentiary Foundations and Objections," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Judicial Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 16, 2009 (moderator) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2009 (panelist) + +"Tanned, Rested, and Ready—Now What? The Practical Side of Expert-Witnessing," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, July 31, 2009 (moderator/panelist) + +Firm Counsel Project Roundtable, at American Bar Association National Legal Malpractice Conference, Miami, April 23, 2009 (moderator) + +"Opening Remarks," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, Deerfield Beach, February 18, 2009 + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2008 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Professionalism: How to Build Your Reputation & Keep Your License," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program seminar, Coral Gables, September 9, 2008 (panelist) + +"Trial and Pretrial Conduct on Paper and in Practice: A Cut Above the Ordinary," Aa q n cuit Bench & Bar Conference, Colorado Springs, September 5, 2008 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lorman Educational Service el , E ics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials'' + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics iri Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Leg4Ethics inFlorida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) 7 , + +Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judicial Campaign Conduct Forum, West Palm Beach, May 8, 2008 (panelist) + +"Leadership Through Service," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Leadership Academy—The Art of Leadership program, West Palm Beach, April 25, 2008 (panelist) + +What Tangled Webs We Weave: Conflicts of Interest in Trust & Estate Practice," at The Florida Bar Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section Trust & Estate Symposium: Litigating Under Florida's New Trust Code, Fort gerdale and Tampa, February 7 and 8, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Pal Beach County Bar Association Professionalism Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beac , February 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigators (and Lawyers) Gone The Ethical Ramifications of Pretexting and Undercover Investigations," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Island, February 1, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigatad Lawyers) Gone.: The Ramifications of Covert and Deceptive Tactics," at National AssOciation of Legal Investigators conference, Fort Lauderdale, January 25, 2008 + +"DeafIngWIth Difficult Opposing Counsel," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, December 3, 2007 (panelist) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, FL, November 2, 2007 (panelist) + +"Ethics Shrugged: Supervising Outside Agents in a Blame-the-Lawyers World," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 29, 2007 (including written materials) + +"Dealing With Difficult Clients," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, FL, May 16, 2007 (panelist) + +"You Can't Always Say What You Want: Limits on Lawyer Speech Post-Fieger," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Miami Beach, February 9, 2007 (moderator/panelist) + +"Achieving Success in the Practice of Law: Lessons Learned in Thirty-Nine Years at the Bar," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Lunch With the Legends Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2006 + +"Ethical Concerns Regarding Attorneys' Ancillary Businesses," at The Florida Bar Masters', Seminar on Ethics, Boca Raton, June 23, 2006 (including written materials) ("Masters Seminaergo nii i thics") + +"Conflicts of Interest," at American College of Trial Lawyers Current Developmen Civil Procedure, Evidence and Legal Ethics seminar, Hollywood, April 6, 2006 (including terials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at CLE International Ethics seminar, Tampa, Febr 6 (including written materials) + +) "Update on the New Rules of Professional Conduct," at Palm Beach County-Bar Association 14th Annual Professionalism Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 8, 2.005`(1 A + +"Final Arguments," at National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA), m 2 erican College of Trial Lawyers, and Florida Legal Services, Inc., Critical Trial Skills for Legal Services Attorneys seminar, Deerfield Beach, January 3-6, 2005 (faculty member) + +"Ethics & the Unauthorized Practice of Law: How Paralegals Are Affected," at Paralegal Association of Florida 26th Annual Meeting & Seminar, West Palm Beach, September 20, 2002 + +"Avoiding Legal Malpractice," at Professional Education Systems Institute The Briar Potch: Thorny Issues in Florida Civil Litigation seminar, Dania, August 20, 2002 (including written materials) + +"Avoiding Malpractice," at PalniBeich County Bar Association Family Law seminar, West Palm Beach, December 8, 2000( V + +"Ethical Challenges Facing Today's dttorney," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 9th Annual Ethics and Professionalism Workshop and Seminar, West Palm Beach, May 31, 2000 + +"Applied Ethics," at the Palm Beach County Bar Association North County Section Ethics Seminar and Luncheon, North Palm Beach, May 26, 1999 + +"Avoiding aloractiee Claims," at Holland & Knight LIP. and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, West Et&ach, January 15, 1999 + +"AyatiffirMalpractice Claims," at Holland & Knight LIP. and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, West Palm Beach, November 5, 1997 + +Palm Beach County Bar Association A Study in Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, April 29, 1996 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Malpractice," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 4th Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, June 2, 1995 + +"Making the Standards of Professionalism Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 3rd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 18, 1993 + +"Jury System—New Approaches," at American Inns of Court chapter meeting, West Palm Beach, February 11,1993 (panelist) + +"Professionalism in Litigation Practice Outside the Courtroom," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 2nd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 28,1992 + +"Making the Standards Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 1st Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, March 22,1991 + +ii "Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at Nova Southeastern University School of Law ri tation assembly, Fort Lauderdale, August 16,1990 + +"Conversations on Professionalism," at Rumger Professional Issues Forum, Or c 7l ) anuary 1990 (panelist) + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly admitted arid awyers, West Palm Beach, October 30,1987 + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly acknifftitl Florida lawyers, West Palm - \ Beach, May 31,1985 + +"The Bar and Its Works," at West Palm Beach Rotary Club luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 7,1985 + +#### CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE + +Member, Board of Directors, Hanley Centertx idatrUn, Inc. (d/b/a Hanley Foundation), 2013—date (Treasurer, 2015—date) + +Member, Board of Directors, Educatfbn F ration of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1986-2009 (President, 1989-1991,19924995k; Chairperson, 2002-2003; Honorary Co-Chairperson, 25th Anniversary Spirit of Youti(Awards ()Inner, February 19, 2009) + +Member, State Board of Directors, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2005-2008 (Member, Governance Committee, 2007-2008) + +Member, Division Advisory Board, South Coastal Division, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2002-2011 (Chairperson, Bylaws Committee, 2007-2010; Co-Chairperson, Fund Development Committee, 2010-2011) + +Member, Picardie( Directors, Nelle Residence for Girls, Inc., 1982-1989,1997-2009 Oresident, 1986-1988,1997-2000,2002-2009) + +Member, Roger Stadium Advisory Board, 2002—date (Chairperson, 2013-2014) + +Member, Board of Directors, Greater West Palm Beach Division, Florida/Puerto Rico Affiliate, American Heart Association, 2001-2003 + +Member, Economic Council of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1988-2002 (Member, Education Committee, 1989-1992, 1994-1998; Member, Executive Committee, 1994-1995; Member, Task Force on the Florida Constitution, 1997-1998; Member, Strategic Action Committee, 2000-2002) + +Co-Chairperson, Steering Committee, Principals Leadership Training Institute (joint project of the School Board of Palm Beach County and the Education Foundation of Palm Beach County), 2003-2004 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Candidates Citizens Interview Committee, 1995 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Strategic Planning Committee, 1988-1992 Member, Palm Beach County Court Facilities Planning Committee, 1986-1987 Member, Coordinating Committee, Project Mosaic (community-wide collaboration to develop strategies for achieving stable racial balance in Palm Beach County's public schools), 1989-1991 Member, Steering Committee, Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Qualifications Forum, 1995 -- Member, Palm Beach County Champions, WorldClass Schools, 1995-1999 (Chairperson, 1995-1997) Member, Campaign Cabinet, United Way of Palm Beach County, Inc , 2001-2002 Member, Board of Directors, Zoological Society of the Palm Beaches,Inc., 1970s Member, Board of Directors, Legal Aid Society of Palm BeacliCroUnty, 1981-1990 , Member, Board of Directors, YMCA of the Palm Beaches, Inc., 1983-1986 Member, Society for American Baseball Research (SABR), 1997—date (Co-Chairperson, Host Committee, 2000 Annual Convention Sustaining member, Friends of the (National Baseball. of Fame and Museum, Inc.), 1999—date Member, Board of Directors, ect Park/Southland Park Homeowners Association, 1987- 1988 Member, Palm Beach Comer, Washington and Lee University Alumni Association (Chairperson, 1985-1990) + +## MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS + +I , "The Inquisitor General," Palm Beach Post, February 22,2010, p. A13 (op-ed.) "SticklersUnite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 3)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2009, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 2)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2008, p. 16 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 1)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2008, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Save Only, the Lonely!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2008, p.17 + +"Sticklers Unite! Ban Verbing the Noun!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2008. pp. 11, 21 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Semicolonitis!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2007, p. 17 + +"Sticklers Unite! Save the Apostrophe!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2007, p. 18 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Death by Comma!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullgin, March 2007, pp. 18-19 + +From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society fo-rarberican Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000 (editor) + +"From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Spring Home to Record-Setters," From MCGillicdgdy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 3-5 + +"All-Time Florida-Born Major League Baseball Team," From McGillkuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseba litesr, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 15-16 + +#### MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS + +"Public Education: The Lifeblood of Democracy," Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Spirit of Youth Awards dinner, West Palm Beach, January 30, 2003 + +"Citizenship and the Search for Justice," given at Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Week luncheon, Palm Beach, September 16, 1996 + +"The Future of Public Education," given at Sun-Sentinel "The '90s: Palm Beach County Faces the Future" forum, Lake Worth, May 15;1990 + +#### PERSONAL + +- -77 Born and reared in West Palm Beach, Florida (fourth-generation resident) + +Married to Dr. Donna Marks; two children, two grandchildren, three stepchildren, and three step-grandchildren + +Hobbies and interests: + +'Baseball—past, present, and future + +Piano + +Lexicology, syntax, and writing style + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +# **EXHIBIT F** + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +A Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND Y EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PROPOSED JURY INSTR AND VERDICT FORM + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E \ tein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.470, files this Notice of Pro c J Instructions and Verdict Form. Epstein adopts , Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brad ards' C November 9, 2017, proposed Standard (Civil) Jury Instructi s N . 201.3, 202.2, 202.3, 202.4, 301.1, 301.2, 301.3, 301.4, 301.5, 406.1, 406.3, 406 406.9, 601.1, 601.2, 601.5 and 700, which Epstein has not restated here. Ep • obj- is to a November 9, 2017, proposed Jury Instructions Nos. 201.1, 201.2 % , 06.4, 406.5, 406.8, 406.12, 503.2 and Adverse Inference, and a Nove 2017, and December 1, 2017, Supplemental Instructions. Epstein has provided alternative and additional instructions for the Court's consideration. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Frts2 Primary: Scott®lin ockljiw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(SSi e• Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm B oulevard West Palm 33409 law endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseralendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +### 101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will answer truthfully all questions asked of you as prospective jurors [so help you God]? + +r ic S# II PIIIr + +%b..) + +Source. + +Florida Sta Bard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +SSA + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 Qualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire + +Many of you have electronic devices such as cell phones, smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Even though you have not yet been selected as a juror, there are some strict rules that you must follow about electronic devices. + +When you arc called to a courtroom, the judge will give you specific instructions on the use of electronic devices. These rules are so important that the judge may tell you that you must turn off your cell phone or other electronic devices completely or that you cannoa6a,v your cell phone or electronic devices in the courtroom. If someone needs to contact in 1[W of an emergency, the judge will provide you with a phone number where you canes e messages. + +If the trial judge allows you to keep your cell phones, co apt other electronic devices, you cannot use them to take photographs, video recordin or a dio recordings of the proceedings in the courtroom or your fellow jurors. You must ng use to search the Internet or to fmd out anything related to any cases in the courthouse + +Why is this restriction imposed? This restricti the case without distraction and only on the evidence, some of you, these restrictions affect your normal way you are used to communicating and perha because jurors must decide in the courtroom. I know that, for ities and may require a change in the the way you are used to learning. + +If you investigate, research, or m make sure that the information you o opportunity to dispute or challenge by a juror unfairly and imprope system promises. es on your own, the trial judge has no way to oper for the case. The parties likewise have no cy of what you find. Any independent investigation the parties from having that opportunity our judicial + +Between now an not discuss any informati and family mem called for jury a jury and ho the case anythi phone or n yyou have been discharged from jury duty by the judge, you must allbut your jury service with anyone, including friends, co-workers, You ay tell those who need to know where you are that you have been you are picked for a jury, you may tell people that you have been picked for the case may take. However, you must not give anyone any information about e people involved in the case. You must also warn people not to try to say or write to you about your jury service or the case. This includes face-to-face, puter communications. + +I want to stress that you must not use electronic devices or computers to talk about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages, including e-mail and text messages, about your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about your jury service or ask for advice on how to decide any case. + +The judge will tell you when you are released from this instruction. Remember, these rules are designed to guarantee a fair trial. It is important that you understand the rules as well as the + +impact on our system of justice if you fail to follow them. If it is determined that any one of you has violated this rule, and conducted any type of independent research or investigation, it may result in a mistrial. A mistrial would require the case to be tried again at great expense to the parties and the judicial system. The judge may also impose a penalty upon any juror who violates this instruction. All of us are depending on you to follow these rules, so that there will be a fair and lawful resolution of every case. + +Source; + +Florida Stbgdard Jury Instruction (Civil) (not numbered) + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +s A Co + +### 201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire + +Welcome. [I] [The clerk] will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. + +This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a ci trial is a disagreement between people or companies, where the claims of one or more of ies have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +This case has two components. First, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstei a claim against Defendant Scott Rothstein for utilizing three cases that Rothstein's 'gainst Epstein to fabricate other claims and continue the operation of a Ponzi sche e. S cond, about whether Plaintiff feSprobable ca hate and co '1 proceeding against Defendant alleging that knew or s ve known about Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +is an attorney. In Augus Somber 2008, while he was a sole practitioner, :led three claims against fo alleged sexual misconduct + +In late March 2009, join firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"). At the time he joined RRA, E ids d the title of "partner" and he turned over to Scott Rothstein the three clients who ha claims against Epstein. RRA continued to pursue these clients' claims until the firm t 'n November 2009. + +It was publicly disclose in ea lfNovember 2009 that Rothstein, the senior partner of RRA, had conducted a fraudulent Po eme which, in part, had used the fact that sexual abuse claims against Epstein were bet rosecuted by MA to induce investors to buy interests in fictitious, non-existent settlements s ral abuse claims against Epstein. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millio rs and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. + +In ea er 2009, Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a lawsuit against M, in 200 brought against Epstein when was a sole practitioner in Rothstein ' clients. Epstein alleged that while was a partner at RRA 2008, we being used in 2009 to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims ple in those cases, and instead were done to benefit and lure investors into Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. contends that Epstein filed the lawsuit for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate him into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims. Epstein eventually settled the cases with three clients. + +A default was entered against Rothstein because he ailed to respond to Epstein's Complaint Epstein voluntarily withdrew his claims against client in August 2010. Epstein dismissed his claims against in August 2 12 with ut prejudice to his right to reassert them at a later time. The only claim pending is claim against Epstein for malicious prosecution. + +The S1 rit witnesses who may testify in this case are Jeffrey Epstein via video deposition), a. Scott Rothstein (via video deposition), and Mr. clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe). + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles + +Who are the people here and what do they do? + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and decide how to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that you will need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on the issues of this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plaintiff. A party that ctd • is sled the Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of representing their cl for their client here at the trial. They have taken oaths as attorneys t the rules for their profession. cans they speak eir best and to follow + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Counsel: The atto Link, represents Jeffrey Epstein, who is the person w courthouse. His job is to present his client's side of t • to most of the time as "the Plaintiff' or "the introduce who is sitting at the table with you? side of the courtroom, Scott initial proceeding here at the He and his client will be referred endant." Mr. Link, will you please + +Defendant/ nt r-P1 Scarola, represents a counterclaim against Mr. Epstein his client will usually be refe Scarola, will you please introd attorney on this side of the courtroom, Jack defendants who has been sued and who brought to present his client's side of things to you. He and as "the Defendant" or "the Counter-Plaintiff" Mr. s sitting at the table with you? + +Court Clerk: This on sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. [He] [She] is here to assist me with some oft m hanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that4e uced in the course of the trial. + +Co reporter. this tri The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. [His] [Her] job is to maintain order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. Anything you need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should be brought to [him] [her]. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the case. Only I can do that. + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begin to select in a few moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what the facts are and what the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point and have no fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial, there are rules that all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyone, including friends and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on how to decide this case. + +I want to stress that this rule means you must not use electronic devices or computers to communicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, [maps], or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom.\*\* + +*\*\*The trial judge should select one of the following two alternative instructions explaining the rules governing jurors' use of electronic devices, as explained in Note on Use 1.* + +*Alternative A:* [All cell phones, computers, tablets or other types of electronic devices must be turned off while you are in the courtroom. Turned off means that the phone or other electronic device is actually off and not in a silent or vibrating mode. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or of your fellow jurors. After each recess, please double check to make sure your cell phone or electronic device is turned off. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. You cannot have in the jury room any cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +*Alternative B:* [You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +What are the reasons for these rules? These rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make inquiries on your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that the information you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportunity to dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you fmd. That is contrary to our judicial system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and challenge the evidence being considered against it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Any independent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start ov tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the tax these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, suc paying a fine or both. ings, and 'al is a If you violate g time in jail, + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, o these proceedings. That means those communications shall e\* court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing instructed the courtroom personnel that any communi presence must be reported to me, and I will tell communication from you that I believe may be of • part of the record of made in open court with the with the court clerk. I have have with them outside of my and their attorneys about any the parties and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate concerning your comfort and safety, suc to assemble for duty, how you should or jury room, and similar inquiries. ith courtroom personnel about matters arking, location of break areas, how and when personal items can be brought into the courthouse + +If you become aware o any dfation of these instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me b g a note to the bailiff. + +### Source: + +Florida S Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.2 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5** +**201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 201.3. + +### 101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will well and truly try this case between the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, M , and a true verdict render according to the law and evidence [so help you God]? + +Source: + +Florida dard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.2 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +tsA Co + +### 202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 202.2. + +A, g + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8** +**202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 202.3. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9** +**202.4 Juror Questions** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 202.4. + +**301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, +Stipulations, and Admissions** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 301.1. By agreeing to the instruction, Epstein does not waive the argument that some of the items should not be permitted to be used in this case. Epstein agrees to the instruction so that, in the event that either the parties agree, or the Court rules, that these types of items will be used, the relevant instruction should proceed the item. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11** +**301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, +or Physical Evidence is Admitted** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 301.2. + +### 301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 301.3. + +esA Co + +### 301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 301.4. Epstein does not waive any objections to any particular demonstrative or visual aids by adopting the proposed instruction, but includes the instruction in case the Court decides, or the parties agree, to permit any such items + +tsA Co + +### 301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 301.5. + +Go + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 301.10 Instruction Before Recess + +We are about to take [our first] [a] recess. Remember that all of the rules I have given you apply even when you are outside the courtroom, such as at recess. + +Remember the basic rule: Do not talk to anyone, including your fellow jurors, friends, family or co-workers about anything having to do with this trial, except to speak to court staff. This means no c-mailing, text messaging, tweeting, blogging, or any other form of co unication. You cannot do any research about the case or look up any information about the c emember to observe during our recess the other rules I gave you. If you become aware ation of any of these rules at all, notify court personnel of the violation. + +After each recess, please double check to make sure [that your c other electronic device is turned off completely] [that you do not bring your cell pho or gther electronic device into the courtroom or jury room]. + +A S' 17.1ir + +'....) + +Source:÷ + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.10 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16** +**406.1 Introduction** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.1. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17** +**406.2 Summary of Claims** + +The claims and defenses in this case are as follows: + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein claims that Defendant Scott Rothstein conspired with other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, for personal greed and enrichment, and engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved, among other things, marketing of non-existent settlements involving claims (both real and fabricated), against Epstein, and engaging in improper litigation tactics in order to promote and sustain that Ponzi scheme. Epstein brought claims for violations of Florida's Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, violations of Florida's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO), abuse of process, fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Rothstein did not defend those claims and, consequently, a default was entered against him. A default is not an actual determination of the merits of the claim. Instead, it is a legal ruling that because the defendant did not contest the claim, the defendant will be deemed to have committed the offense. Consequently, the sole issue for your determination on Epstein's claim against Rothstein is the amount of damages that should be awarded to Epstein against Rothstein for the harm that Rothstein caused to Epstein. + +Epstein must prove the amount of damages he suffered by Rothstein's actions by the greater weight of the evidence. + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, also filed claims (called the "civil proceeding") against Defendant [REDACTED] J. Edwards. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against [REDACTED] before the claims were decided by the Court. Epstein's dismissal of the claims against [REDACTED] was without prejudice to Epstein's right to later reassert them. Therefore, those claims are not before you for your determination. + +[REDACTED] filed a Counterclaim for malicious prosecution against Epstein which alleged that Epstein maliciously and without probable cause, filed and continued the civil proceeding against him, and that this caused [REDACTED] damage. Epstein denies that claim and also asserts that he is entitled to a verdict in his favor. + +[REDACTED] must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that Epstein caused to be filed or continued the civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause and that Epstein's lawsuit caused [REDACTED] to suffer damage. + +I will now define some of the terms you will use in deciding this case. + +#### Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.2 + +Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.500; DG Sports Agency LLC v. First Round Mgmt, LLC, 174 So. 3d 541, 544 (Fla. 4ih DCA 2015) (effect of default); Donohue v. Brightman, 939 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (effect of default); Clerk's Default on January 21, 2010 (D.E. 27) + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn ,O4imic CO . iS 5) + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18** +**406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.3. + +#### Claim Against Rothstein: Damages + +You must consider whether or not to award damages in favor of Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein for the claims that Jeffrey Epstein has raised against Scott Rothstein. + +You should award Jeffrey Epstein an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate him for his loss, injury or damage, including any damage. + +If you find that Jeffrey Epstein has not proven any loss or damage, ySt Jeffrey Epstein nominal damages such as one dollar. I award + +#### Source:, + +Abuse of Process: Valdes v. GAB Robi Investments v. Payless Flea Mark damages are sufficient to recov So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); (Nort Star Capital Acquisitions, LLC v. Krig, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (M.D. Fla. 2009), Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Contracts and Business) 504.11 Inc., 924 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); S & I So. 3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Nominal on for abuse of process. See Stoler v. Levinson, 394 + +CO + +Fraud: Prieto v. Smoolc I ., So. 3d 916, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). See also Sena v. Pereira, 179 So. 3d 433, 4 la. 4 DCA 2015). + +Conspiracy: (Fla. 46 c Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Inv. Group, Inc., 79 So. 3d 855, 863 (quoting Raimi v. Furlong, 702 So. 2d 1273, 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). + +Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Acts: Fla. Stat. 772.103, Fla. Stat. § 772.104, Fla. Stat. 772.102 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### Issues on Claim + +I will now instruct you on what must prove to prevail on his claim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +maliciously and without probable c tuted or continued a civil proceeding against The issues you must decide on claim against Epstein are whetherS which later terminated in favor of and, if so, whether that action was a Ie4al cause of damage to M. + +must prove each of these elements in order to prevail on h' for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +I will now instruct you further on the individual elements of t> 's + +### Source: + +Second Paragraph: Florida Stan Instruction, but the order first, then explain the ele understand why th v. Mancusi, 632 2015); Hickm ury Instruction 406.8. This paragraph reflects the Standard e instructions has been changed to instruct the jury on the elements the jury. It is Epstein's position this will allow the jury to better be g instructed on probable cause, malice, etc.; Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. 13 2 (Fla. 1994); Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 416 DCA ay's Intl Realty, Inc., 16 So. 3d 154, 155 (Fla. 46' DCA 2009). + +Third P Union Rent-A-C atum Bros sReal tat Co. v.IIII 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926); 1. Amsco Division v. 468 So. 2d 349, 353 (Fla. 31.1 DCA 1985); Alamo Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1355 (Fla. 1994). + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### Probable Cause + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting and then continuing a civil proceeding against another, the facts and circumstances known toSfre E stein were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against was supported by existing facts. + +It is burden to stage of the civil proceediiiii of it. You may find that the allegations in the civil proceeding brought by Jeffrey Epstein were u untrue, or if some of the claims would not have been successful. rove that Jeffrey Epstein lacked probable e at every En from the filing of his suit t rmination failed to show a lack of probable ca ven some of ' y eic ., shown to be + +The information that Jeffrey Epstein relied on does not have t hand by Jeffrey Epstein, but can be trustworthy information that You may find probable cause existed even if there was proceeding. rmation gained firstded to Jeffrey Epstein. inty of the outcome of the + +You cannot base your finding as to probab has proven that Jeffrey Epstei your findings as to whether there was a lack terminated his civil proceeding against Bra whether or not you believe that malice. Likewise, you cannot base cause on evidence that Jeffrey Epstein + +### Source: + +First Paragraph: Florida S tird Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.4. + +Second Para show lack of 1172-73 ( did n prosecuti con v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (must le cause for entire case or claim fails); May v. Fundament, 444 So. 2d 1171, A 1984) (same); Moity v. Bodin, 489 So. 2d 474 (La. Ct. App. 1986) (where lack of probable cause for at least several of allegations, then no malicious + +Third Paragraph: ■ **v. Kostroff, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2000) (does not have to be first-hand information); Endacott v. International Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("the defendants need not be certain of the outcome of the underlying proceeding to have probable cause for bringing the counterclaim").** + +**Fourth Paragraph: Bros Real Estate & Investment v. =, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926) t infer probable cause based on finding of malice); Central Florida Machinery Co., Inc. v. 424 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) ("a bare showing of malice will not, in turn, permit** an inference of a lack of probable cause"); Applestein v. Preston, 335 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) ("when want of probable cause was not established, the existence thereof could not be inferred from malice, if malice was proved. Although malice may be inferred from want of probable cause, want of probable cause cannot be inferred from malice"); Endacott v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("However, termination of an underlying civil proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff is not sufficient evidence that the defendants lacked probable cause"). + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +iS 5) + +#### Malice + +One acts maliciously in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he or she does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to bring an offender to justice or to establish what he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Epstein acted maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the conduct complained of, including any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the proceeding. + +You are not required, however, to find malice because of a lack of institute or continue the proceedings and you should not draw an inference of probable cause if other evidence of the circumstances at the time o different conclusion. ause to ice from a lack uct lead to a + +First Paragraph: Florida Stan J/Ci u ce4Si struction 406.5 + +#### Source: + +Second Paragraph: Co recognized that mar 290 So. 2d 49 (F However, mar Home Milk from the be rebu draw if o Real Estate & Investment Co. v. ores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So. 24 1181, 1185 1977) ("It is inferred from the akisme of probable cause. v. Whitfield, 974); uval Jewelry Co. v. 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 8a(Fla. 1931). egally synonymous with the absence of probable cause. = v. Miami Association, 143 Fla. 518, 197 So. 125 (1940). The inference of malice probable cause is not one of law but merely a presumption of fact which may is is an inference which the jury is not required to draw, and which it should not facts disclosed by the evidence lead to a different conclusion. See Brothers 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623 (1926). a. + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 406.6. + +esA Co + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24 406.7 Legal Cause + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates I= Standard Jury Instruction 406.7. + +A, g + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25 Bona Fide Termination + +must prove that the termination oftfre Epstein's civil proceeding against him was a bona fide termination in favor of + +A termination of a civil proceeding is a bona fide termination of the civil proceeding only if it ended in a manner that demonstrated that the proceeding lacked merit. + +You must consider the reasons for the voluntary dismissal by Jeffrey Epstein his claims against as well as all of the circumstances surrounding the vol dismissal of those claims in making this determination. + +#### Source: + +Giving an instruction: Florida Standard Jury Lnstructio question exists concerning whether the prior proc additional instruction on that issue will be nee Systems. Inc., 344 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 19 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). C• 06.8, Notes on Use ("If a fact ated in favor of the claimant, an Shidlowsky v. National Car Rental man v. Crabro Motors, Inc., 199 So. 2d + +First Paragraph: Debrincat v. Fisch prosecution claim); CA Hansen Co 1990) (plaintiff must show eith Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. 2d 68, 70 (Fla. 2017) (element of malicious keri et at, 565 So. 2d 812, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA e decision on the merits or a bona fide termination); So. 2d 1352, 1356 (Fla. 1994). + +CO 'S + +Second Paragraph: Shar E&A, Inc., 135 So. 3d 428, 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 115 I 5 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2008)). + +Third Paragra v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Fla. 4i° DCA 2008) ("whether a voluntary di i q lifies as a `bona fide termination' of the proceedings in the defendant's favor dep the reasons and circumstances underlying the dismissal"); Doss v. Bank of Ameri 857 So. 2d 991, 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("whether a withdrawal or abandonment of a law constitutes a bona fide termination in favor of a person against whom the suit was brought depends on the total circumstances surrounding the withdrawal or abandonment"). + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26** +**406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 406.9. + +### 406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages + +Ifsfind for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find fors you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate for such damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceeding complained of. + +Go + +Source: + +Florida dard Jury Instructions (Civil) 406.12 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28** +**601.1 Weighing the Evidence** + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates [REDACTED] Standard Jury Instruction 601.1. + +#### 601.2 Believability of Witnesses + +Epstein hereby adopts and inco orates Standard Jury Instruction 601.2. Epstein does not waive any argument that should not be permitted to present any expert testimony by inclusion of this jury instruction, but includes it in the event the Court overrules Epstein's objections + +Go + +#### 601.4 Multiple Claims, Numerous Parties, Consolidated Cases + +In your deliberations, you will consider and decide several distinct claims including claims by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and one claim by against Jeffrey Epstein. Although these claims have been tried together, each is separate from the others, and each party is entitled to have you separately consider each claim as it affects that party. Therefore, in your deliberations, you should consider the evidence as it relates to each claim separately, as you would had each claim been tried before you separately. + +CO SA + +iS 5) + +Source- + +(c. + +0 + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 601.4 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +#### 601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument) + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates a Standard Jury Instruction 601.5. + +Go + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32 700 Closing Instructions + +Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Standard Jury Instruction 700. + +A g + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 33 JBIFURCATED ISSUEL 503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES' + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +for his conduct in maliciously prosecuting a civil proceeding against claims that punitive damages should be awarSinst y Epstein nitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convi evi ence that Jeffrey Epstein was r t. intentional misconduct or gross negligence, a substantial cause of damage to M. Under those circumstances yo your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convin nce does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted t Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Ep actual knowledge of the a ess of the conduct and that there was a high pr' at injury or damage to nd, despite that knowledge, he intentionally • at course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious cf or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" is more compelling and persuasive evidence" means the more pe case. the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it e already instructed you, "greater weight of the vincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the + +If you decide that p itive d unages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein, then we will have a separate proceeding in hlEo decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against ffrey pstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensa amages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consi fo wing: + +- re, extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including +- (A) whether the wrongful conduct was motivated solely by unreasonable financial gain; +- (B) whether the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey Epstein; + +&#x27; Punitive damages have been bifurcated from the main trial, so that this instruction should not be given unless it becomes appropriate. + +.1 whether, at the time of damage, Jeffrey Epstein had a s .• . ific ntent to harm and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein did in fact harm and + +(2) the financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein; and + +However, you may not award an amount that would financially destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +You may in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +Go + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 503.2 + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### VERDI T F + +We, the Jury, fmd: + +#### A. Epstein's Claims Against Rothstein + +On Jeffrey Epstein's claims a Epstein prove by the greater weight othstein, what amount of damages did Jeffrey dente that he suffered? + +#### B. ounterbiaim Against Epstein + +I. comment ey prove that an original civil proceeding was caused to be ued against him by Jeffrey Epstein? + +> YES NO + +Cos + +If the Answer to Question 1 is "YES" then proceed to Question 2. If the Answer to Question I is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +2. Did r ve that Jeffrey Epstein was the legal cause of the original civil proceeding against + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 2 is "YES" then proceed to Question 3. If the Answer to Question 2 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +3. Did the termination of Jeffrey air civil proceeding cAdt tea bona fide termination of that proceeding in favor of + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 3 is "YES" then proceed to Questi the Answer to Question 3 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed n, t, her. + +4. Did prove by the ale cause for Jeffrey Epstein to initiate ght of the evidence that there was no ue his original civil proceeding against + +YES + +If the Answer to Question 4 is then proceed to Question 5. If the Answer to Question 4 is "NO," then please date atggn the verdict form and proceed no further. + +5. Dill ards prove by the grearw i t of the evidence that Epstein instituted or continued hi al tvil proceeding against maliciously? + ++YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 5 is "YES" then proceed to Question 6. If the Answer to Question 5 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +6. Did prove by the greater weight fi,e evidence that EpsteSititution or continuation of his original civil proceeding against caused damage to + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 6 is "YES" proceed to Question 7. If the Answer to Question 6 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +7. What amount of damage, if any, did prove, by the weight of the evidence, that he suffered as a result of Epstein's institution or continuatio iho s original civil proceeding against n + +\$ + +8. Did prove that punitive damages ted as punishment to Epstein for instituting or continuing his original civil proceedi • • dwards and as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding without probabl e + +YES + +YOU HAVE REACHED YOUR VE FORM ( S \ ASE SIGN AND DATE THIS VERDICT + +SO SAY WE ALL, this& , 2018. + +FOREPERSON \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86fa5b9a341257becbb7e1ac2c6522d1c116e9a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409/EFTA02763409.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,9073 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763409.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 179, + "chars": 410660, + "elapsed_seconds": 61.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 354.78000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 74.5250244140625 + ], + [ + 496.0395202636719, + 74.5250244140625 + ], + [ + 496.0395202636719, + 129.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 129.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'SSRbLEY J. a \nSECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 405.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 405.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BJE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 460.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 460.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S 0 S TO DEFENDANT/ \nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND D EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 508.2944030761719, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 508.2944030761719, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.32, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 391.921630859375, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 391.921630859375, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 220.32, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 227.501220703125, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 227.501220703125, + 307.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 307.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 348.3616027832031, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 348.3616027832031, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n151\u00b0 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 468.97625732421875, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 468.97625732421875, + 199.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 199.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 412.9317626953125, + 494.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 412.9317626953125, + 523.9924926757812 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 523.9924926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n151\u00b0 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 468.97735595703125, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 468.97735595703125, + 665.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 665.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated A \u2022", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 269.60302734375 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 269.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 643.95 + ], + [ + 428.0738220214844, + 643.95 + ], + [ + 428.0738220214844, + 659.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 659.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein \n17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 156.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 156.5675048828125 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 185.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 185.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A \nUSBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 269.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 414.93600000000004, + 269.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 414.93600000000004, + 298.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 298.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United 1,\" f America v. Scott Rothstein \u2014 Forfeiture Action \nDC Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 522.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 522.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 620.8000030517578 + ], + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 620.8000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ".e s", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 409.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 409.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34149169921875, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34149169921875, + 605.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 605.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.192, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 510.8891906738281, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 510.8891906738281, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 285.192, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EFBIIiDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nOBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-D \nAMENDE T LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 496.53521728515625, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 496.53521728515625, + 389.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 389.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 399.16748046875, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 399.16748046875, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 470.41339111328125, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 470.41339111328125, + 212.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 212.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S .D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 412.1123962402344, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 412.1123962402344, + 543.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 543.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n1516 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 467.417236328125, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 467.417236328125, + 686.6030197143555 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 686.6030197143555 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSD . la. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 413.47174072265625, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 413.47174072265625, + 451.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 451.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.54, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 180.54, + 294.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 659.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 659.3399999999999 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 686.8799999999999 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 686.8799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Experts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.476, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 335.65606689453125, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 335.65606689453125, + 423.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 289.476, + 423.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 351.72076416015625, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 351.72076416015625, + 621.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 621.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 88.28999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 363.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 363.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 446.60302734375 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 446.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.25421142578125, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.25421142578125, + 439.10302734375 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 439.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED \nBY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 466.73779296875, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 466.73779296875, + 534.8624877929688 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 534.8624877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND 'REY EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED TRIA\\ N S LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REBUTTAL WITNESSE1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.040771484375, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.040771484375, + 265.863037109375 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 265.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.308, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 362.8977355957031, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 362.8977355957031, + 293.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 250.308, + 293.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 498.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Culver 111 \nCURRICULUM VITAE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6522216796875, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6522216796875, + 70.33056640625 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 70.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCCUPATION/PROFESSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 186.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERIENCE 'S di 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 372.570556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 372.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION AND LICENSING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 542.8305816650391 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 542.8305816650391 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE \nThe Florida Bar: \n2006-2007)\n1989-1992) \nMember, Ethics 2000 Review Panel, 2001", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 297.0141906738281, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 297.0141906738281, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Palm Beach County Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 116.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 116.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American College of Trial Law ters:_,/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 609.4540710449219 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 609.4540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 687.0840835571289 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 687.0840835571289 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 135.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 135.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Foundation:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 213.4541015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 213.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 420.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 420.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 232.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 232.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 470.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 470.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 384.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 384.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 499.259033203125 + ], + [ + 289.8453674316406, + 499.259033203125 + ], + [ + 289.8453674316406, + 549.1870422363281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 549.1870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 365.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 365.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 496.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 496.9540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND Y EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF PROPOSED JURY INSTR AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 504.81536865234375, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 504.81536865234375, + 362.60302734375 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 362.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5620727539062, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5620727539062, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.5447692871094, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.5447692871094, + 95.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 95.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 \nQualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.97998046875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.97998046875, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO.3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5410766601562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.5410766601562, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.212, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 427.98199462890625, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 427.98199462890625, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 \n201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.1218872070312, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.1218872070312, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 565.9925079345703 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 565.9925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5 201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.163330078125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.163330078125, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.9247741699219, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.9247741699219, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.444091796875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 530.444091796875, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 414.19281005859375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 414.19281005859375, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8 202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9 202.4 Juror Questions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, Stipulations, and Admissions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 480.4200000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 480.4200000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11 301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, or Physical Evidence is Admitted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5845947265625, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5845947265625, + 81.603515625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1517639160156, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1517639160156, + 95.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 95.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.35888671875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.35888671875, + 82.10302734375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 82.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 458.9419860839844, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 458.9419860839844, + 95.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 95.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 14", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 81.603515625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4099426269531, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4099426269531, + 95.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 95.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 \n301.10 Instruction Before Recess", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.0075073242188, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.0075073242188, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16 406.1 Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17 406.2 Summary of Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 67.7750244140625 + ], + [ + 111.35186004638672, + 67.7750244140625 + ], + [ + 111.35186004638672, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18 406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.710205078125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.710205078125, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Claim Against Rothstein: Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 398.82373046875, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 398.82373046875, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 112.28748321533203, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 112.28748321533203, + 399.363037109375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 399.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Issues on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 349.09930419921875, + 81.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 349.09930419921875, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.61831665039062, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.61831665039062, + 456.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 456.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 21", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.36376953125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.36376953125, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Probable Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.6386413574219, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.6386413574219, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 483.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 483.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.5487670898438, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.5487670898438, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Malice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.283203125, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.283203125, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 442.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 442.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 \n406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.1084594726562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.1084594726562, + 95.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24 \n406.7 Legal Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4495239257812, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.4495239257812, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25 \nBona Fide Termination", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.4931030273438, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.4931030273438, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 318.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 318.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26 406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 27", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.8762817382812, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.8762817382812, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 408.6361083984375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 408.6361083984375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28 601.1 Weighing the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.6317749023438, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.6317749023438, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 Believability of Witnesses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 389.5010986328125, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 389.5010986328125, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 30", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.1527709960938, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 533.1527709960938, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.4 Multiple Claims, Numerous Parties, Consolidated Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 80.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 468.1551513671875, + 80.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 468.1551513671875, + 95.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 95.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 31", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.8692016601562, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 533.8692016601562, + 81.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 81.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.42, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 437.9006042480469, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 437.9006042480469, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 93.96000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32 \n700 Closing Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5584716796875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5584716796875, + 95.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 95.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 33 \nJBIFURCATED ISSUEL \n503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.7931518554688, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 532.7931518554688, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 611.55 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 611.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 109.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 109.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDI T F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 343.863037109375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 343.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Claims Against Rothstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 291.6252746582031, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 291.6252746582031, + 399.363037109375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 399.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. \nounterbiaim Against Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 318.30340576171875, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 318.30340576171875, + 523.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 523.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 188 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 205 + ], + [ + "Line", + 100 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763409" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b852d66084fedd705bc3b5295ecec5a5e85f02d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.md @@ -0,0 +1,856 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OCOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +C + +#### P I% DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Supplement to Proposed Jury Invoftions and Verdict Form, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. On November 9, 2QJ7 Ed ids filed his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form. +- 2. pleading: likce ,poir reby aids the following additional proposed jury instruction to that + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestation, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +As a consequence of thoese ,' visions in both federal and state law, proper pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein was not limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein against the three clients represented by . The law expressly allowed Mr. to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexual assault or child molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of )064 , 2017. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent ; ' E-Serve + +OLA + +No.: 16944 + +A -Mail(s): @searcylaw m) + +ary E-Mail:-\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Pho e: (561) 686-6300 + +F 561-383-9451 + +ys for J. + +I=IIIADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800YJOaMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 2 of 3 + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 3 + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +KaraelinIcrocklaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William ChesterME, Esquire + +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com + +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-655-4777 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; + +smahoney@agwpa.corn + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)459-8300 + +Fax: (561 -80-8691 + +Attorneys Neffiey Epstein + +Nichole J>\$egal, Esquire + +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; + +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for J. + +Esquire + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2 Z + +Fred HaddadrEsqu + +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; + +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com + +Fred Haddad, P.A. + +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +Phone: (954)-467-6767 + +Fax: (954)-467-3599 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; + +efiling@tonjahaddad.com + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-467-1223 + +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +raS + +# DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED AIRY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, • hereby files his Second Supplement to grounds therefor states as follows: J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, and aS + +- 1. On November 9, 2017, ( Form. +- 2. On Novanbez 14, 2017, filed his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict filed his Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, which added an additional proposed jury instruction based upon Federal Rule 'of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute Section 90.404. to Liabos v. Harman, 215 So. 2d 487, 489-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) (copy attached): hereby adds the following additional proposed jury instruction, pursuant + +In order for probable cause to exist on the part of Jeffrey Epstein, the facts known to Jeffrey Epstein must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the filing of a civil lawsuit. Where, however, it would appear to a cautious man that further investigation is justified before filing a civil lawsuit, then the failure to perform that additional investigation may form the basis to conclude that such person lacked probable cause to file the civil lawsuit. + +4. [REDACTED] further adds the following additional proposed jury instruction: + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded and does not dispute that he filed the Complaint at issue against LM, Scott Rothstein, and [REDACTED] on December 7, 2009, and he continued to prosecute claims against [REDACTED] until he voluntarily dismissed those claims on August 16, 2012. + +In determining what Jeffrey Epstein's intention was at the time he filed and prosecuted claims against [REDACTED], the law presumes that he intended the natural and probable consequences of his acts. Accordingly, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein filed and prosecuted false claims against [REDACTED] then he is presumed to have intended to file and prosecute false claims, unless that presumption is rebutted by other evidence. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1st day of December, 2017. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Second Supplement to Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 3 of 3 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com KaraQIinlcrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esqui njs®FLAppellateLaw.co kbt@FLAppellateLaw.co Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +J. Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@,nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Sui Fort Lauderdale, FL 33 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scestein + +215 S0.24:1487 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. + +Beverly LIABOS, as Administratrix of the Estate of P. Liabos, Deceased, Appellant, + +> v. Gale HARMAN, Robert Teates, and Publix Super Markets, Inc., Appellees. + +> > No. 68-6. + +Oct. 26, 1968. + +As Modified on Rehearing Nov. 27, 1968. + +Action for malicious prosecution. The Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Robert E. Willis, J., granted summary judgment for the defendant store owner and his employees and the plaintiff appealed. The District Court of Appeal, Liles, Chief Judge, held that material issue of fact as to whether employees of store had probable cause for signing affidavit charging plaintiff with issuing worthless checks precluded grant of summary judgment. + +Reversed and remanded. + +West Headnotes (6) + +### pi Malicious Prosecution + +e.- Nature and Elem Prosecution in General of Malicious + +An action f maliciotf5 prosecution lies where a ci 1 o criminal proceeding has been comme the defendant against the plaintiff, s proceeding terminated in favor of the plaintiff, defendant did not have probable cause for commencing such prosecution, malice was present and plaintiff suffered damage. + +4 Cases that cite this headnote + +### 121 Malicious Prosecution + +43.. Probable Cause + +Lack of probable cause by defendant to commence original civil or criminal judicial proceeding is mixed question of law and fact in malicious prosecution action. + +2 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### l3l Malicious Prosecution + +e- Probable Cause + +When facts relied on by plaintiff in malicious prosecution action to prove ludic[ probable cause on part of defendantareip dispute, their existence is to be determined by jury. + +bead \>-7 I Cases that cite thiscbeadnOte + +#### 141 Malicious Proseadia + +Ci• P IA\* Cause + +Of facts relied upon by plaintiff in rosecution action to prove lack of cause is question for the trial court. + +that cite this headnote + +#### Malicious Prosecution + +(7- Grounds in General + +"Probable cause" is a reasonable ground for suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in belief that person accused is guilty of offense with which he is charged. + +6 rage% that cite this headnote + +#### 161 Judgment + +4— Tort Cases in General + +Material issue of fact as to whether employees of store had probable cause for signing affidavit charging plaintiff with issuing worthless checks precluded grant of summary judgment in malicious prosecution action against the store owner and the employees. + +3 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### Attorneys and Law Firms + +\*487 John C. Dent, Jr., and Herb Blessing, of Lee & Blair, Sarasota, for appellant. + +David S. Yost, of Cramer, S Ginsburg & Sarasota, for appellees. + +#### Opinion + +LILES, Chief Judge. + +Liabos, the deceased appellant, was arrested on warrants charging him with the crime of issuing worthless checks. The warrants were issued upon affidavits signed by appellees, Gale Harman and Robert Teates, both of whom were employed by Publix Super Markets, Inc., and both of whom were acting within the scope of their employment. Harman and Teates acted after several fellow employees visually identified Liabos as the individual who had passed a number of worthless checks in Publix stores. Neither appellee, however, \*488 was an eye-witness to the passing of the checks; both acted solely upon information given them by others and apparently overlooked or ignored certain information casting a large measure of doubt on their conclusion regarding Liabos. They investigated Liabos' reputation with the Publix store in his community, for example, and found that he was considered to be both trustworthy and-honest. In addition, they found that he was gainfully employed, and considered trustworthy by his empl M.. Further. they that while the ficulprit wore found that he drove a different car fr& that ascribed to the bad check artist, and glasses, Liabos did not. + +Despite these discrepan', appals signed the affidavits and Liabos was arrested.ite was allowed to post bond, but only after he was detained in the custody of the police for several hours. The following day one Jess Leland was arrested and confessed to passing the worthless checks in question, whereupon Liabos was released from bond and the charge against him was dropped. + +Appellant subsequently brought this suit for malicious prosecution against Harman, Teates, and Publix Super Markets, Inc. Appellees filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, and this appeal ensued. Thereafter Liabos died and his wife, as his administratrix, was substituted for him in this proceeding. + +The issue before us is whether the court properly granted defendant-appellees a summary judgment in light of the (acts disclosed. + +- Ill It is well established in Florida that an action for malicious prosection lies where the following elements concur: +- 1) the commencement or continuance of an original civil or criminal judicial proceeding; +- 2) its legal causation by the present defy d nt against the plaintiff; rill% 3) its bona fide termination ' plaintiff; +- 4) the absence of prob le calligir such prosecution; +- 5) the presence lice; d +- 6) damage- confornabig to legal standards resulting to plain + +Duval Jewelry Co. v. 1931, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880; Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. 1926, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623; Wilson v. O'Neal, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 101; W. Prosser, Torts s 113 (3d cd. 1964). There is no doubt, and it is not seriously disputed, that five of these elements exist in the instant case. The only real controversy concerns whether or not the appellees had probable cause to institute the criminal proceedings against Liabos. + +121 13) 14) It should first be noted that the lack of probable cause is a mixed question of law and fact. Cold v. Clark, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 347. That is to say, when the facts relied on to prove a lack of probable cause are in dispute, their existence is to be determined by the jury as a question of fact. Their legal effect, on the other hand, is to be determined by the court, but oniyAter these facts are admitted or found to be true. v. Bryson, 1927, 94 Fla. 1165, 115 So. 505; Cold v. Clark,supra. 151 Probable cause has been properly defined as: 'A reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in the belief + +that the person accused is guilty of the offense with which he is charged.' + +Dunnavant v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 871, 874; see also Thompson v. Taylor, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 16, 19; Cold v. Clark, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 347, 349. That is to say, in order for probable cause to exist thecountenance of the situation must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the forces of a criminal proceeding. And where it would appear to a 'cautious man' that further investigation is justified before \*489 instituting that proceeding, then liability may attach for the failure to do so. + +(6 Summary judgment in an analogous case was reversed in v. Food Fair Stores, North Dade, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 836. + +In the present case, a jury may well decide that further investigation was warranted by the facts. We therefore reverse the decision of the lower court and remand for action consistent with this opinion. + +PIERCE and All Citations 215 So.2d 487 J.T., concur. 4 O S End of Document 0 2017 Thomson Reuters. No 1S C) C ( S e + +U.S. Government Works. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND +VERDICT FORM** + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. ██████, by and through undersigned +counsel, hereby files his Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms for trial in the above-styled +matter. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- +Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys ██████ J. ██████ + +# COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester =, Esquire wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-655-4777 FaX: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire 4414ak jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Fax:(561)835-8691 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +CO + +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLa Nichole J. Segal, Esquire Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +J. M, Esquire staff efile@pathtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Edwards Ftstos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, rtre2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred HaddV3aquire Dee@rianaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)-467-6767 Fax: (954)-467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS** + +**201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE** + +Welcome. The Clerk will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a disagreement between people or companies [or others, as appropriate], where the claims of one or more of these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +This case concerns whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to sue Attorney [REDACTED] alleging that Mr. [REDACTED] had fabricated and exaggerated claims in civil lawsuits filed by [REDACTED] that three underage females had been repeatedly sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein over a period of years as part of a pattern of molestations of dozens of underage females. According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, the reason Mr. Edwards falsely accused Epstein of sexual molesting these underage females was to knowingly assist in a criminal scheme to defraud investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars by committing a series of felonies in cooperation with convicted Ponzi schemer, Scott Rothstein. [REDACTED] contends that the lawsuits he filed on behalf of his 3 clients were well-founded that he, Mr. [REDACTED] was innocent of any wrongdoing. Jeffrey Epstein knew that Bradley [REDACTED] was innocent, and Jeffrey Epstein knew that he, Jeffrey Epstein, was guilty of sexually molesting Mr. [REDACTED] 3 clients and dozens of other underage females. + +While Attorney [REDACTED] was prosecuting his clients' sexual abuse claims against Epstein, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm where Attorney [REDACTED] worked, Scott Rothstein, had conducted a fraudulent scheme which, in part, had used the fact that sexual abuse claims against Epstein were being prosecuted by the firm to induce investors to buy interests in non-existent settlements. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millions of dollars and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. + +Mr. Edwards further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed suit against Attorney [REDACTED] for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate Mr. [REDACTED] into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims. Epstein eventually settled the claims being prosecuted by Attorney [REDACTED] on behalf of his clients, the same claims that Epstein alleged in this lawsuit were fabricated, for approximately a total of \$5.5 million. + +Attorney [REDACTED] continued to defend against Epstein's lawsuit, challenging it on the grounds that it had no legal or factual support. Shortly before the Court was scheduled to rule on Mr. [REDACTED]'s challenge, Epstein dismissed all of his claims against Attorney [REDACTED]. Furthermore, Epstein allowed the statute of limitations to expire making it legally impossible for Epstein to bring any claims based on the conduct he sued upon in the original complaint. Yet while Epstein denies [REDACTED] claim for malicious prosecution, he has refused to answer any + +uestions about the civil claims he says were fabricated or about the basis for claiming knowingly participated in a massive fraud. + +The principal witnesses who will testify in this case are [TO BE COVERED DURING VOIR DIRE]. + +# 201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer t as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and de how o apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you t t ou II need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on th of this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plain ' that is sued is called the Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of re ntitIttheir clients. That is, they speak for their clients here at the trial. They have take ths attomeys to do their best and to follow the rules of their profession. + +Plaintiff's Counsel: The alt n this side of the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents and is the per n who filed the claim in dispute. I-lis job is to present his client's side of things to you. rola and his client will be referred to most of the time as "the plaintiff'. Mr. Swill you please introduce who is sitting at the table with you? + +De e ant Counsel: The attorneys on this side of the courtroom, (introduce by name), repres y Epstein, the one who has been sued. His/Her job is to present his/her client's side of things to you. He/She and his/her client will usually be referred to here as "the defendant". (Attorney name), will you please introduce who is sifting at the table with you? + +Court Clerk: This person sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. He/She is here to assist me with some of the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that are introduced in the course of the trial. + +Court Reporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. His/Her job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. His/Her job is to maintain order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. Anything you need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should be brou ifftn,hitn/her. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the case. 0 do that. + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the July, which we will begin to n moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what the facts an at the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point and hay t o ot opinion about the lawsuit. + +1%, ? tall jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case only on presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyone, inclu ds and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or your ce. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on how t deci is case. In order to have a fair and lawful trial, there + +I want to stress t t this ru e means you must not use electronic devices or computers to communicate abou this including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on ye or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to lr-froth anyone about this case or your jury service. + +Yo u must not do any research or look up words, names, maps, or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom. + +'You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate th anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, vid ngs or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end oft ile you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury om. meone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages ode them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you. + +What are the reasons for these rules? These 4osed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and only on th presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make inquiries o ur outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that the info 'on obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportunity to dispute r chat ge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary to our judicial system, which ores every party the right to ask questions about and challenge the evidence being co 'dere ainst it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Any independent t • nitl iga on by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunt Li • icial system promises. + +juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start over. A mistrial is a tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the taxpayers. If you violate + +&#x27; Alternative B instruction. + +these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, such as serving time in jail, paying a fine or both. + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, or me, will be part of the record of these proceedings. That means those communications shall either be made in open court with the court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing will be filed with the court clerk. I have instructed the courtroom personnel that any communications you have with the of my presence must be reported to me, and I will tell the parties and theirep about any communication from you that I believe may be of interest to the panic and ' attorneys. + +However, you may communicate directly with co u onnel about matters concerning your comfort and safety, such as juror parking, Aot c ft break areas, how and when to assemble for duty, dress, what personal items can be tiNtvg t 2 into the courthouse or jury room. + +If you become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me by giving a ti to to the bailiff. + +#### • • • 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THEEtil l ) E PROCESS + +The last thing I want to o, be we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +: This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportune ge o know a little bit about you, in order to help them come to their own conclusion your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide who they think should be the jur in this case. + +How we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some general questions of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific questions that they will ask of you. After they have asked all of their questions, I will meet with them and they will tell me their choices for jurors. Each side can ask that I exclude a person from serving on a jury if they can give me a reason to believe that he or she might be unable to be fair and impartial. That is what is called a challenge + +for cause. The lawyers also have a certain number of what are called peremptory challenges, by which they may exclude a person from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of elimination, the remaining persons are selected as the jury. It may take more than one conference among the parties, their attorneys, and me before the final selections are made. + +Purpose of Questioning: The questions that you will be asked during this process are not intended to embarrass you or unnecessarily pry into your personal affairs, but iti ' , .tant that v the parties an d their attorneys know enough about you to make this im tision. If a is asked that you would prefer not to answer in front of the w o e om, just let me know and you can come up here and give your answer just in fro the orneys and me. If you have a question of either the attorneys or me, don't hesitat ow. + +Response to Questioning: There are no righ nswers to the questions that will be asked of you. The only thing that I ask is answer the questions as frankly and as honestly and as completely as you can. r w ke an oath to answer all questions truthfully and completely and you must do s e tng silent when you have information you should disclose is a violation of that If a juror violates this oath, it not only may result in having to try the case al ver again but also can result in civil and criminal penalties against a juror personally. agai it is very important that you be as honest and complete with your answers as y ib can. If you don't understand the question, please raise your hand and ask for an exptau or clarification. + +In m, this is a process to assist the parties and their attorneys to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you are for this purpose. If, for any reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror, you must tell us. + +# 202.1 INTRODUCTION + +You have now taken an oath to serve as jurors in this trial. Before we begin, I am going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to this case and let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +It is my intention to give you some of the rules of law but it might be that I wil not know for sure all of the law that will apply in this case until all of the evidence is prese ever, I can anticipate most of the law and give it to you at the beginning of the~tertl at you will better understand what to be looking for while the evidence is prese different or additional law applies to the case, I will tell you. 4 evidence I will give you the final instructions on which yo your verdict. At that time, you will have a complete written set of the instructio not have to memorize what I am about to tell you. ater decide that ent, at the end of the + +The following are the rules of law o apply in this case. + +[READ RELEVANT< Z ) IONS BEGINNING AT PG. 201 + +C.) + +instruct you to consider. Evidence: Evidence is the information that the la this case. Evidence includes the testimony of the k w' u to see or hear in deciding uments, and anything else that I + +Witnesses: A witness is a perso attorneys' questions for the jury. "giving testimony." Testimon to tell the truth. es an oath to tell the truth and then answers nng of attorneys' questions by witnesses is called tements that are made when someone has sworn an oath + +# 202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a chance to make what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is allowed t give you his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you are likely a nd hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening statements theta s/ will bring their witnesses and evidence to you. + +The plaintiff? lavlyer will normally question the witness first. That is called direct N examination. . R, n the defense lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever ess has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other evi ce may also be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the plaintiffs' witnesses have testified, the defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses on the stand and go through the same process. Then the plaintiffs' lawyer gets to do cross-examination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that you remember that testimony come from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimony and they are not themselves witnesses. + +Objections: Sometimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a question is asked of a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may make what is called an "objection." The rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are many reaso s for the attorneys to object. You should simply wait for me to decide how to proceed. that an objection is "sustained", that means the witness may not answer the quest' ay that the objection is "overruled", that means the witness may answer the quest'C mustrtot11 + +When there is an objection and I make a decision, you e from that decision \,.. that I have any particular opinion other than that the rules f condting a trial are being correctly followed. If I say a question may not be asked or a ii4c:" u must not try to guess what the answer would have been. That is against the ru + +Side Bar Conferences: Sometimes Will to speak to the attorneys about legal elements of the case that are not appropriate f e to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few of these conferences as possibl hile are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if we do have to have suc a conference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference at the side of my desk so at we not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroom. + +Rece r ks in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses". During a recess you still have y 'es as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been presented to you, I will instruct you on the law that you must follow. It is important that you remember these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which come next, and later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence to reach your decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the opportunity to make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing arguments, I will instruct you further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you must follow to decide the case. + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury instructions, you will go to the jury oom and discuss and decide the questions I have put on your verdict form. You will have a e jury instructions to use during your discussions. The discussions you have and th O is you make are usually called "jury deliberations." Your deliberations are absolute ( 4ri nd neither I nor anyone else will be with you in the jury room. + +k Verdict: When you have finished answering the qu 'on w" will give the verdict form to the bailiff, and we will all return to the courtroom, wh its y , verdict will be read. When that is completed, you will be released from your as a jury. + +Finally, before we begin the trial, we you just a brief explanation of rules you must follow as the case proceeds. + +Keeping an Open Mind: ou m~lst pay close attention to the testimony and other evidence as it comes into the trial. owever, you must avoid forming any final opinion or telling anyone else your views on the case until you begin your deliberations. This rule requires you to keep an open mind until you hake heard all of the evidence and is designed to prevent you from influencing how your fet-jOrors think until they have heard all of the evidence and had an opportunity to form their own opinions. The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and 1 have instructed you on the law. It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything. + +Consider Only the Evidence: It is the things you hear and see in this courtroom that matter in this trial. The law tells us that a juror can consider only the testimony and other evidence that all the other jurors have also heard and seen in the presence of the judge and the lawyers. Doing anything else is wrong and is against the law. That means that you must not do any work or investigation of your own about the case. You must not obtain on your own any information about the case or about anyone involved in the case, from any source whifnoever. '1 '7 This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, , the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get inform ton to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether ) are he courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. You must not visit places mentio 'n al or use the Internet to look at maps or pictures to see any place discussed d .Sc a + +Do not provide any information about t anyone, including friends or family members. Do not let anyone, including th s roily members, make comments to you or ask questions about the trial. Jurors gt n have discussions of any sort with friends or family members about the case or the Al and places involved. So, do not let even the closest family members make comment o you or ask questions about the trial. In this age of electronic communication, I c t to s s again that just as you must not talk about this case face-to-face, you must not tat bod1.. this case by using an electronic device. You must not use phones, tablets, computers electronic devices to communicate. Do not send or accept any messages related to is case or your jury service. Do not discuss this case or ask for advice by any means at all, including posting information on an Internet website, chat room or blog. + +No Mid-Trial Discussions: When we are in a recess, do not discuss anything about the trial or the case with each other or with anyone else. If attorneys approach you, don't speak with them. The law says they are to avoid contact with you. If an attorney will not look at you or speak to you, do not be offended or form a conclusion about that behavior. The attorney is not supposed + +to interact with jurors outside of the courtroom and is only following the rules. The attorney is not being impolite. If an attorney or anyone else does try to speak with you or says something about the case in your presence, please inform the bailiff immediately. + +Only the Jury Decides: Only you get to deliberate and answer the verdict questions at the end of the trial. I will not intrude into your deliberations at all. I am required to be neutral. You should not assume that I prefer one decision over another. You should not try t ess-,at my opinion is about any part of the case. It would be wrong for you to conclude ing I say or do means that I am for one side or another in the trial. Discussing an he facts is your job alone. + +# 202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS + +If you would like to take notes during the trial, you may do so. On the other hand, of course, you are not required to take notes if you do not want to. That will be left up to you individually. + +You will be provided with a note pad and a pen for use if you wish to take notes. My notes that you take will be for your personal use. However, you should not take them with yo from the courtroom. During recesses, the bailiff will take possession of your notes and wi em to you when we reconvene. After you have completed your deliberations, the b O eliver your notes to me. They will be destroyed. No one will ever read your notes. + +If you take notes, do not get so involved in note-taking th e distracted from the proceedings. Your notes should be used only as aids to yo + +Whether or not you take notes, you should relrS s o fr" memory of the evidence and you should not be unduly influenced by the notes o AiiIrASs,r ' fors. Notes are not entitled to any greater weight than each juror's memory of the e + +sufficient time to write the question on a piece of pa pass it to me. Do not put your name on the qu You also may have a question you think should be asked of a nes 0. , there is a way for you to request that I ask the witness a question. After all CS th om have completed their questioning of the witness, you should raise your hand if y t 0,2 a uestion. I will then give you Sicd and give it to the bailiff, who will it to anyone or discuss it with anyone. + +I will then review the question w may be considered by a jury in dete that control the attorneys' ques meys. Under our law, only certain evidence erdict. You are bound by the same rules of evidence ecide that the question may not be asked under our rules of evidence, I will tell you. Othenvise, I will direct the question to the witness. The attorneys may then ask follow-up \s questions if they wish. If there are additional questions from jurors, we will follow the same' ocednre again. + +# 202.4 JURORQUESTIONS + +### Questions for the court or courtroom personnel: + +During the trial, you may have a question about these proceedings. If so, please write it down and hand it to the bailiff, who will then hand it to me. I will review your question with the parties, and their attorneys, before responding. -t, + +# Questions for witnesses: + +By g this procedure, I do not mean to suggest that you must or should submit written questions for witnesses. In most cases, the lawyers will have asked the necessary questions. + +### 301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED TESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS + +# a. Deposition or prior testimony: + +Members of the jury, the sworn testimony of (name), given before trial, will now be presented. You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any other evidence in the case. + +# b. Interrogatories: + +Members of the jury, answers to interrogatories will now be readacythe rrogatories are written questions that have been presented before trial by one party to . They are answered under oath. You are to consider and weigh these questions n s as you would any other evidence in the case. + +# c. Stipulated testimony: + +Members of the jury, the parties have agreed that if (name of witness) were called as a witness, he/she would testify (read or des e testimony). You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any ot in the case. + +# d Stipulations: + +Members oft rties have agreed to certain facts. You must accept these facts as true. (Read the ts). + +# pplicable to all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts.) You must accept these facts as true. (Read the admissions). + +2. Applicable to fewer than all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts). You must accept these facts as true in deciding the issues between (identify the affected parties), but these facts should not be used in deciding the issues between (identify the unaffected + +parties). (Read the admissions). + +### **301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED** + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received in evidence. Witnesses may testify about or refer to this or any other item of evidence during the remainder of the trial. This and all other items received in evidence will be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the trial. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS + +The (describe item of evidence) has been received in evidence. It is being shown to you now to help you understand the testimony of this witness and other witnesses in the case, as well as the evidence as a whole. You may examine (describe item of evidence) briefly now. It will also be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the trial. + +iS 4)9 + +# 301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS + +# a. Generally: + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. The testimony of the witness is evidence; however, these (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the case unless ceived in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. Only items received ' e will be available to you for consideration during your deliberations. + +# b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids based on dis wed as ptions: + +c-%k; This witness will be using (identify demonstrai4e aVi to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. These items have been his/her testimony. They may be based on assu Mich you are free to accept or reject. The testimony of the witness is evidence; how er, (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the received in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. Only it s r ed in evidence will be available to you for consideration during your deliberationstv assist this witness in explaining + +ricS + +# 301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received into evidence. It has been admitted only for the purpose of (describe purpose) as to (name party). You may consider it only for that purpose as it might affect (name party). You may not consider that evidence for any other purpose as to any other party. + +4.1"\ CO 'S iS 4)9 + +# 406.1 INTRODUCTION + +Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the evidence in this case. I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that you must use in reaching your verdict. You will recall at the beginning of the case I told you that if, at the end of the case I decided that different law applies, I would tell you so. These instructions are (slightly) different firm what I gave you at the beginning and it is these rules of law that you must now follow. I finish telling you about the rules of law, the attorneys will present their final argu ou will then retire to decide your verdict. 777 + +# 406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS + +The claims in this case for your consideration are as follows: + +claims that Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause filed and continued to prosecute a lawsuit against Mr. M. That lawsuit alleged that Mr. fabricated sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of three clients. According to the lawsuit Jeffrey Epstein filed against Mr. M, Mr. pursued the fabricated claims as part of Mr. M . knowing participation in an ill rizi scheme with Scott Rothstein. Mr. claims that he was damaged by the fa an 'Mous claims that Mr. Epstein filed against him. + +Jeffrey Epstein denies that claim. + +The parties must prove all claims and def the greater weight of the evidence. I will now define some of the terms you will this case. + +### **406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE** + +“Greater weight of the evidence” means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting and continuing the civil proceeding against , the facts and circumstances known to Jeffrey Epstein were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the claims made by Jeffrey Epstein against were supported by existing facts. + ++6s cos + +# 406.5 MALICE + +One acts maliciously in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to establish what he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Epstein actedmaliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the conduct complaiued oQi4cluding any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the proceeding. 2 + +S 4)9 + +2 Durkin v. In 814 So. 2d 1246, 1248.49 (Ha. 2d DCA 2002) ("As to malice on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff need not allege actual malice; legal malice is sufficient and may be inferred from, among other things, a lack of probable cause, gross negligence, or great indifference to persons, property, or the rights of others. Here, the allegations supporting a lack of probable cause are evidence from which a jury could infer malice.") (emphasis added). + +#### **406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING** + +One is regarded as having instituted or continued a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted or continued. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 406.7 LEGAL CAUSE + +# a Legal cause generally: + +The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury, or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage, so that it can reasonably be said that, but for the; malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding, the loss, injury, or damage would not furred. + +# 1). Concurring cause: + +O AS In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, injury, or dam e the malicious institution or continuation of such a proceeding need not be the only e malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding may be a legal cause of loss amage even though it operates in combination with the act of another or so o er use if the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes sub ha to producing such loss, injury, or damage. + +# c. Intervening cause: + +The malicious institute or c ntinuation of a proceeding may also be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage even it operates in combination with the act of another or some other cause occumngifil r the m licious institution or continuation of a proceeding occurs if such other cause was tsel asonably foreseeable and the malicious institution or continuation of a • \ proceedingyofitributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage or the resulting toss, injury, or 'damage was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding and the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing it. + +# 406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM + +The issues you must decide on M' claim against Jeffrey Epstein are whether Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause instituted or continued a civil proceeding against which later terminated in favor of and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage to + +04 + +#### **406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM** + +If the greater weight of the evidence does not support [REDACTED] claim, your verdict should be for Jeffrey Epstein. + +However, if the greater weight of the evidence supports [REDACTED] claim, then your verdict should be for [REDACTED] and against Jeffrey Epstein. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### 406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate for such loss, injury, or damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceeding complained of. + +If you find for you shall consider the following el t icc,,damage: + +# COMPENSATORY DAMAGES + +# a. Injury to reputation or health; shame, humiliation, mental a i feelings: + +Any injury to reputation or health and any shant'ilhiba on, mental anguish, and hurt feelings experienced in the past or to be experienced in the future. There is no exact standard for fixing the compensation to be awarded on account o iic diluents of damage. Any award should be fair and just in the light of the evidence. + +# b. Fear of physical injury to himself a temb8t of his family. + +Any loss of capacity for the enjoym t of life experienced in the past or to be experienced in the future. There is no exact standard for measuring such damage. The amount should be fair and just in the light of the evidence. ( + +#### a Lost earnings, lost time, lost earning capacity: + +# (I). When loss,eornin or lost time shown: + +Any earnings loaf and the reasonable value of any time lost in the past and any loss of ability to earn mon' e future. + +#### d. 77terreasonable expenses, including lawyers' fees, necessarily incurred by proceeding complained of in the + +# e. Punitive damages: + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +E(l). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant: + +laims that punitive dams es should be awarded against Jeffrey Epstein for his conduct in ding alawsuit against without probable cause to support the an wt i no intention to meet his own obligation to provide relevant and materia • iscovery in support of this lawsuit. claims that and his clients and others into abandoning their legitimate sexual abuse claims].) J stein's purpose for filing this lawsuit was instead to attemp h ey pstein. Punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convincing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which was a substantial cause of loss, injury, or damage to U. Under those circumstances you may, in your discretion, award punitive damages against I. /stein. If clear and convincing evidence does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted against Jeffrey Epstein. allegations of wrongdoing by + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Epstein had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and there was a high probability of injury or damage to despite that knowledge, he intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that Jeffrey Epstein's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" differs from the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it is more compelling and persuasive. As I have already instructed you, "greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +c(7,). Punitive damages - determination °lemon\*: + +You are to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensatory damages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consider the following: + +(A). the nature, extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including the following: + +i. whether the wrongful conduct was motivated solely by unreasonable financial gain; + +ii. whether the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey Epstein; + +iii. whether, at the time of loss, injury, or damage, Jeffrey Epstein had a specific intent to harm and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein did in fact harm and + +RB). (the financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein + +You may in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +# 601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your an was will be. Your agreed-upon answers to my questions are called your jury verdict. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of all exhibits received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to b e pArties and any fact of which the court instructs you to accept. + +In reaching your verdict, you must think about4ri , 0 weigh 7 documents, photographs, or other material that Aikspt nfeceived in evidence. the testimony You and any may also consider any facts that were admitted or ag to b he lawyers. Your job is to determine what the facts are. You may use reason on sense to reach conclusions. You may draw reasonable inferences from the ut you should not guess about things that were not covered here. And, you must a pply the law as I have explained it to you. + +testimony of the witness, considered in the light of all the evidence it C the c d in the light of your own experience and commons sense. Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; the intelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the case; the cans and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witness testified- fay r of the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testified; and th O leness of the n + +# 601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES + +You have heard opinion testimony on certain tec ects from persons referred to as expert witnesses. + +You may accept such opinion testimo2 , or give it the weight you think it deserves, considering the knowledge, skill, expel (ce)it- ining, or education of the witness, the reasons given by the witness for the opiniojxpr ed, and all the other evidence in the case. + +# ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the right to remain silent. However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit, particularly when that lawsuit was begun by a person who then refuses to answer questions about the lawsuit. + +Jurors may draw reasonable conclusions that the refusal to provide IC r to produce other information relating to a civil lawsuit based on a refusal to in min neself is because those answers or that information would in fact be incrimina person refusing to provide the answers and information. erwise harmful to the + +Simply put, if a party in a civil lawsuit refus o r questions on the grounds that the answers may tend to incriminate him, you ma that he is refusing to answer because, in fact, the answer would be incriminating,i you ay consider the refusal as evidence against him. Gs' + +### **601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)** + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attorneys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have a few last i structions for you. + +During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case only witlt\*a nother and only when all jurors are present in the jury room. You will have in th all of the evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching your de • ' ms , ot do any research on your own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, the Inte brother reference materials. Do not investigate the case or conduct any experim . 1!%, visit or view the scene of any event involved in this case or look at maps or the Internet. If you happen to pass by the scene, do not stop or investigate. All ' ors t see or hear the same evidence at the same time. Do not read, listen to, or wat accounts of this trial. + +You are not to commu cafe any person outside the jury about this case. Until you have reached a verdict, must or not talk about this case in person or through the telephone, writing, or electronic corn unication, such as a blog, twitter, e-mail, text message, or any other means. Do t=contact anyone to assist you, such as a family accountant, doctor, or lawyer. These co cations rules apply until I discharge you at the end of the case. + +If u become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by giving a note to the bailiff. + +Any notes you have taken during the trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes are simply an aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are binding or conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own + +memory or that of other jurors. Instead, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the conclusion of the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. No one will ever read your notes. + +In reaching your verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public opinion, r any other sentiment for or against any party to influence your decision. Your verdict s ed on the evidence that has been received and the law on which I have instru + +Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot participat in th ision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdict should om something I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer one verdi (i t) her. Therefore, in reaching your verdict, you should not consider anything that ha 'ASS ; or done, except for my specific instructions to you. + +Pay careful attention to all the i ctio clfrh at I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a copy rpy tnstructions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the instructionsire imp79ftant, and you must consider all of them together. There are no other laws that a to this case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must use them in reacpint yourllecision in this case. + +Whe o lro the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as t fo n during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussio are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have considered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if you are convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not give up your honest + +beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that you and your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case. + +I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answer. I have already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You must follow my instructions and the form carefully. You must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions in the order they appear. After you answer a question, the form tells you what tpclo neitrl will now read the form to you: (read form of verdict) + +You will be given (state number) forms of verdict, which I s d to you: (read form of verdict) + +il If you find for your verdict wi ollowing form: (read form of verdict) + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, your v 1I §sSva " bein the following form: (read form of verdict) + +Your verdict must be un is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. When you have agreed on yo c and finished filling out the form, your foreperson must write the date and sign i thebottom and return the verdict to the bailiff + +any of u need communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it to the bailiff noTe, do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. + +now retire to decide your verdict. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea77d2d90fdb43a09547f8bbbca3adf81e836c26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588/EFTA02763588.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3221 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763588.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 52, + "chars": 65765, + "elapsed_seconds": 19.54, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "P I% \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 300.05810546875 + ], + [ + 509.7298889160156, + 300.05810546875 + ], + [ + 509.7298889160156, + 335.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 335.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 353.94610595703125, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 353.94610595703125, + 159.2235107421875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 159.2235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED \nAIRY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 520.5018920898438, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 520.5018920898438, + 340.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 340.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 353.57611083984375, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 353.57611083984375, + 158.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 158.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "pi Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.828, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 192.716796875, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 192.716796875, + 482.8450927734375 + ], + [ + 72.828, + 482.8450927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "121 Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 191.5867919921875, + 651.24 + ], + [ + 191.5867919921875, + 665.0850982666016 + ], + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 665.0850982666016 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "l3l Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.5868225097656, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.5868225097656, + 179.8450927734375 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 179.8450927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "141 Malicious Proseadia", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 437.24267578125, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 437.24267578125, + 299.465087890625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 299.465087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Malicious Prosecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 436.0954284667969, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 436.0954284667969, + 404.8450927734375 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 404.8450927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "161 Judgment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 386.1051940917969, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 386.1051940917969, + 536.0850982666016 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 536.0850982666016 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys and Law Firms", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 175.76535034179688, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 175.76535034179688, + 99.215087890625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 99.215087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opinion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 106.83533477783203, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 106.83533477783203, + 189.965087890625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 189.965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 230.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 230.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 242.18999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.12, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 312.12, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.844, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 515.9159999999999, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 515.9159999999999, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 83.844, + 396.90000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 352.07611083984375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 352.07611083984375, + 94.353515625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 94.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 402.08400000000006, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 402.08400000000006, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 427.3183898925781, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 427.3183898925781, + 186.603515625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 186.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 \u2022 \u2022 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THEEtil l )\nE PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 365.9422607421875, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 365.9422607421875, + 438.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 438.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 207.99667358398438, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 207.99667358398438, + 93.603515625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 93.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 367.37469482421875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 367.37469482421875, + 94.353515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 94.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 270.6482238769531, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 270.6482238769531, + 95.853515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 95.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 JURORQUESTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 227.46356201171875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 227.46356201171875, + 94.353515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 94.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for the court or courtroom personnel:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 308.7697448730469, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 308.7697448730469, + 120.68701171875 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 120.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 195.47064208984375, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 195.47064208984375, + 253.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 253.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED \nTESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 532.5284423828125, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 532.5284423828125, + 107.103515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 107.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 252.0891571044922, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 252.0891571044922, + 145.353515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 145.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 183.6943817138672, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 183.6943817138672, + 248.103515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 248.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.85999298095703, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 205.55735778808594, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 205.55735778808594, + 380.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 75.85999298095703, + 380.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d Stipulations:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.9800033569336, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 166.3421630859375, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 166.3421630859375, + 486.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 74.9800033569336, + 486.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 564.5699999999999 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 564.5699999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "pplicable to all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 250.2259521484375, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 250.2259521484375, + 593.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 593.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 495.94866943359375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 495.94866943359375, + 94.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 479.27691650390625, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 479.27691650390625, + 94.353515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 94.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 160.2681884765625, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 160.2681884765625, + 121.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 121.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids based on dis wed as ptions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 467.07830810546875, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 467.07830810546875, + 306.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 306.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 398.0994567871094, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 398.0994567871094, + 95.853515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 95.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 212.1266632080078, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 212.1266632080078, + 92.853515625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 92.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 255.20077514648438, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 255.20077514648438, + 96.603515625 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 96.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 94.7235107421875 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 94.7235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.5 MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 166.81552124023438, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 166.81552124023438, + 122.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 122.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.7 LEGAL CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 202.62783813476562, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 202.62783813476562, + 95.18701171875 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 95.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 221.41146850585938, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 221.41146850585938, + 121.43701171875 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 121.43701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1). Concurring cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 200.73049926757812, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 200.73049926757812, + 265.43701171875 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 265.43701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 198.8505096435547, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 198.8505096435547, + 435.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 435.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 219.26583862304688, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 219.26583862304688, + 95.103515625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 95.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 342.4383239746094, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 342.4383239746094, + 94.715087890625 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 94.715087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPENSATORY DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 274.2193908691406, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 274.2193908691406, + 280.715087890625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 280.715087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Injury to reputation or health; shame, humiliation, mental a i feelings:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 456.572509765625, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 456.572509765625, + 318.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 318.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Fear of physical injury to himself a temb8t of his family.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 377.45062255859375, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 377.45062255859375, + 415.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 415.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a Lost earnings, lost time, lost earning capacity:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 290.61053466796875, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 290.61053466796875, + 488.9676208496094 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 488.9676208496094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(I). When loss,eornin or lost time shown:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 289.08935546875, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 289.08935546875, + 513.7175903320312 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 513.7175903320312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. 77terreasonable expenses, including lawyers' fees, necessarily incurred by \nproceeding complained of \nin the", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.161376953125, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.161376953125, + 613.0976104736328 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 613.0976104736328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Punitive damages:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 181.447509765625, + 624.51 + ], + [ + 181.447509765625, + 638.5976104736328 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 638.5976104736328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 277.36968994140625, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 277.36968994140625, + 137.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 137.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 305.7802429199219, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 305.7802429199219, + 95.853515625 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 95.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 427.380859375, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 427.380859375, + 96.68701171875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 96.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 451.044, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 110.16000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 316.6343688964844, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 316.6343688964844, + 122.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 122.4735107421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 69 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 151 + ], + [ + "Line", + 74 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 186 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763588" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79a8463f59243f377a2e90dd97e5ded0e10f48b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.md @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS FOR BRADLEY J. ██████** +**NOVEMBER 10, 2017, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff") hereby designates the following testimony from ██████ J. ██████ November 10, 2017, deposition transcript for use in the instant case and/or as rebuttal: + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 8:15-9:15 | | | | +| 11:15-25 | | | | +| 12:1-19 | | | | +| 12:22-13:14 | | | | +| 21:3-22:17 | | | | +| 23:4-28:18 | | | | +| 28:25-30:2 | | | | +| 30:12-31:2 | | | | +| 32:12-15 | | | | +| 32:21-33:17 | | | | +| 33:23-38:12 | | | | +| 38:20-39:1 | | | | +| 39:11-40:21 | | | | +| 40:24-41:4 | | | | +| 41:9-42:19 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 42:22-44:13 | | | | +| 44:19-46:8 | | | | +| 46:24-47:14 | | | | +| 48:15-49:8 | | | | +| 49:13 | | | | +| 50:3-53:23 | | | | +| 54:13-20 | | | | +| 54:22-61:1 | | | | +| 61:16-63:12 | | | | +| 64:6-65:24 | | | | +| 66:3-15 | | | | +| 67:9-68:7 | | | | +| 68:12 | | | | +| 68:15-75:25 | | | | +| 76:13-77:23 | | | | +| 78:3-6 | | | | +| 78:20-79:3 | | | | +| 79:6-15 | | | | +| 80:8-83:14 | | | | +| 83:19-86:2 | | | | +| 87:4-19 | | | | +| 88:7-19 | | | | +| 88:22-89:23 | | | | +| 91:1-19 | | | | +| 91:23-92:5 | | | | +| 92:15-23 | | | | +| 94:4-6 | | | | +| 94:11-19 | | | | +| 94:24-97:9 | | | | +| 97:19-101:7 | | | | +| 101:16-103:2 | | | | +| 103:12-23 | | | | +| 104:2-105:2 | | | | +| 105:7-106:19 | | | | +| 110:16-22 | | | | +| 111:7-112:6 | | | | +| 112:11-16 | | | | +| 112:18-114:5 | | | | +| 114:12-116:25 | | | | +| 117:2-21 | | | | +| 120:5-121:13 | | | | +| 122:24-123:5 | | | | +| 123:8-22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 123:24-124:22 | | | | +| 125:4-24 | | | | +| 126:2-10 | | | | +| 126:14-128:4 | | | | +| 128:7-23 | | | | +| 134:14-135:18 | | | | +| 135:23-24 | | | | +| 136:2-7 | | | | +| 136:15-138:24 | | | | +| 139:11-144:13 | | | | +| 145:2-4 | | | | +| 147:3-151:10 | | | | +| 151:21-167:2 | | | | +| 167:21-176:23 | | | | +| 177:8-179:20 | | | | +| 181:12-183:23 | | | | +| 184:7-23 | | | | +| 184:25-185:25 | | | | +| 189:3-193:13 | | | | +| 193:18-195:25 | | | | +| 196:12-15 | | | | +| 197:13-15 | | | | +| 198:23-25 | | | | +| 199:2-200:1 | | | | +| 201:5-203:14 | | | | +| 203:19-204:1 | | | | +| 204:5-205:13 | | | | +| 205:15-207:2 | | | | +| 207:22-214:11 | | | | +| 214:14-20 | | | | +| 214:22-215:12 | | | | +| 215:20-216:3 | | | | +| 216:9-17 | | | | +| 217:9-218:20 | | | | +| 218:23-220-16 | | | | +| 220:22-223:5 | | | | +| 223:12-19 | | | | +| 224:15-225:19 | | | | +| 227:7-10 | | | | +| 228:9-229:10 | | | | +| 229:16-23 | | | | +| 230:22-231:19 | | | | +| 234:20-235:1 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|------------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 237:19-238:7 | | | | +| 238:14-239:24 | | | | +| 241:5-242:4 | | | | +| 243:14-244:23 | | | | +| 245:15-246:14 | | | | +| 247:8-18 | | | | +| 248:21-249:25 | | | | +| 250:10-24 | | | | +| 253:2-258:7 | | | | +| 258:18-268:19 | | | | +| 276:24-277:24 | | | | +| 278:14-15 | | | | +| 288:10-23 | | | | +| 289:15-22 | | | | +| 289:25-292:25 | | | | +| 294:6-1 | | | | +| 297:6-300:21 | | | | +| 303:24-304:22 | | | | +| 304:23-305:10 | | | | +| (subject to MPO) | | | | +| 305:11-307:2 | | | | +| 321:9-322:2 | | | | +| 325:22-326:1 | | | | +| 326:16-327:6 | | | | +| 327:24-328:14 | | | | +| 330:1-332:24 | | | | +| 333:11-339:7 | | | | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 3, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocker ch BN 44903) Angela M. Ma B 80) Primary: S h crocklaw.com Primary: li rocklaw.com Prima n2elainlinkrocklaw.com S TrovQ1inkrocklaw.com : Tanya®linkrocklaw.com diary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +"J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dab4c68522097e35a1fa9e8763c97e562feba8d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640/EFTA02763640.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763640.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 17238, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS FOR BRADLEY J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 NOVEMBER 10, 2017, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 369.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763640" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..120c6730f9ccd02982a8e6649fee4bc88378102b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore tenus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. ██████████ ("██████████") the following: + +- a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; +- b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; +- c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*The court has reviewed the heavy transcript and the concepting orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's balancings at the subject hearing. @* + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b 84sed to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in this litigation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connection with a motion, hearing, deposition or trial, before any such information is quoted, disclosed, relied upon or used, the party must file a Motion to have the information or documents deemed to be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under seal in accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclosure, reliance or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. • + +4. The Court defers rulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amounts disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlementTamounts of-' three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of-' three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclosure of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under seal-in -accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epstein's Motion. S shall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in ctions. + +DONE AND ORD in West Palm Beach, Palm Be County, Florida this 'Tlay of DuceiTiEr; 20131 + +> DONALD W. HAFELE UDGE + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepQsearcylaw.com | h rt & Shipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| isx@searcvlaw.corn | nis@FLAAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolateamgisearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Sinsellairdant/Coimter-Plaintiff J. | +| J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@epllc.com | Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com | +| staffietile@pathotojustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts Page 4 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(Thampa.com smahonev@agv'pa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 , Scott@linkrocklaw.com - Karealinkrocklaw.com Aneela@linkrocklaw.coui Tina@linkrocklaw.com Troy@linkrocklaw.com Tanya@linkrocklaw.com EserviceQlinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey E stein' ti \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18e7498e9a91ccfd1a80d0dd9aa8ac8060c63985 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646/EFTA02763646.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763646.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6391, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 319.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 469.79999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763646" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3df2e71a81fdf519e92e2742ff3e01a4cbe6f77e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.md @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXABAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN F tY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF SECOND SUP TO MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SCOPE OF SSIBLE EVIDENCE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je Plaintiff J. ("Ed ("Epstein"), opposes Defendant/Countermber 11, 2017, Second Supplement to Motion in Liminc Addressing Scope of vidence (D.E. 1113) and states: + +# JNTRODUCTION + +seeks to prevent Epstein from introducing any testimony and evidence regarding the criminal duct that occurred with the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler law firm ("RRA") during the the that he was employed there, but that was not known to Epstein until after December , 2009. Epstein agrees that the existence of probable cause for initiating a claim is determined based on information known at the time the original civil proceeding is filed. However, counsel placed the "continuation" of probable cause at issue before this Court at a recent hearing. Additionally, counsel added the "continuation" of the original civil proceeding as an issue in the parties' Pretrial Stipulation. (D.E. 1132, ¶C.2.B.) The Pretrial Stipulation specifically recognizes that the continuation must be based on evidence and information that was learned subsequent to the original filing. Id. Therefore, it makes no logical sense, and would in fact be reversible error, to hold that Epstein cannot offer evidence to the jury of his reasons for continuing the lawsuit. + +As for invocation of the "absolute litigation privilege," the priv.l ay be an affirmative defense to an abuse of process action where the conditions of th privilege are satisfied; however, this is not an abuse of process action. What is m en is case is that not all of the conditions of the absolute litigation privilege were'sfi on the facts alleged in Epstein's Corrected Second Amended Complaint. Si g9C° • c is case and Epstein having probable cause to continue with this suit against n %Sy as Judge finding when he denied Il=' Motion to Dismiss Epstein's emended Complaint. Motion to Dismiss asserted the litigation privilege abs to bar to Epstein's cause of action. The Court found that the absolute litigation v id not bar this proceeding and found that Epstein's allegations were sufficient to d a use of action for abuse of process. (D.E. 389.) (Exhibit A.) Thus, the litigation a does not serve to bar Epstein from offering testimony and evidence to su is 8 -faith belief that was engaged in litigation misconduct that bore no relat he claims of MI clients, and, thus, provided Epstein with a reasonable basis t in the connection between Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and misconduct. + +# ARGUMENT + +- 1. Placed the "Continuation" of Epstein's Original Civil Proceeding at Issue Which Entitles Epstein to Defend by Introducing Evidence that Formed the Basis for His Continuing Probable Cause + +has the burden of establishing, by the greater weight of the evidence, that Epstein commenced and continued the judicial proceeding against him without probable cause, See v. GCC Beverages, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 1986); Endacott v. Jut 7 Hos So. 2d 915, 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("plaintiff must show that probable c stages of the underlying proceeding."). A civil litigant has probable has "a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances Icn to , in th claim." v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5m (citing 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). A litigant may ml SIr - and knowledge information that was provided" to him. . s t , , 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 2000). Inc., 910 lacking at all g a suit when he e validity of the v. Sabella, or "trustworthy 1364 (M.D. Fla. + +Significantly, counsel for t , btt Link, at a recent hearing indicated that burden was proving no probab at the time Epstein filed the original civil proceeding and counsel, Jack S corrected him and stated: + +(12/5/17 6:1-9.)1 + +there was no probable cause to continue the proceeding. ion and continuation of the proceeding caused damage to ey both because no probable cause ever existed. So both initiated and continued in the absence of probable cause. + +Additionally, the parties' Joint Pretrial Stipulation submitted after that hearing identified the continuation as an "issue[] of fact for determination at trial on Counterclaim against Epstein": + +&#x27; Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit B. + +If Epstei,il robable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding against M, based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +(D.E. 1132, C.2.B, e.s.) + +Clearly, any and all of the testimony and evidence that supports Epste• rob le cause for the initiation and continuation of his original civil proceeding against e. and is admissible. The evidence and testimony Epstein seeks to introdu tens to show Rothstein's connection to and the cases was litigatin Epstein, specifically during the six-month period in which Rothstein was alleged b i home investors to be using those same Epstein cases to defraud them. Even if suglt en was discovered by Epstein after the initiation of the original civil proceeding a Ponzi scheme investors were known prior to initiating the original suit, and Epstein's subsequent discovery of such pdtd rved to corroborate those allegations and supported Epstein's probable cause to hav tinued the original suit. Any judicial limitation on Epstein's efforts to introduce at t ti ony and evidence at trial would interfere with Epstein's right to defend agains wa ' erroneous assertion that Epstein lacked probable cause to continue this action, an e reversible error. and the allegations of the + +# 2. The Absolute Litigation Privilege Does Not Apply to + +wants the Court to find that Epstein could not have had probable cause to initiate the civil proceeding because the conduct upon which Epstein based his Complaint against abuse of process in the civil lawsuits brought on behalf of his three clients against Epstein) is absolutely protected by the litigation privilege, such that any such co duct could not have formed the basis for any claim against Under this thought 171hsi4s, for the absolute privilege to preclude a showing of probable cause by Epstein, the would need a 0 to show that Epstein knew when he initiated the civil proceeding, an es before he filed his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, that the 1- ion vilege precluded every cause of action asserted therein without any possibility th kS is would survive. + +In August 2011, in his Supplement to Mo • DCsmiss Epstein's Second Amended Complaint, argued that the litigatio n ' e as an absolute bar to Epstein's claims. (Exhibit C.) The Court disagreed wi is a ment and found that Epstein's allegations in support of his abuse of process c sufficient to plead a cause of action. (D.E. 389) (Exhibit A). Thus, in continui ton Epstein had a reasonable basis to believe the absolute litigation privilege did n y. Judge 2011 Order (two years after the filing of the original Complaint enyin Edwards' Motion to Dismiss Epstein's Second Amended Complaint is compellin ce that Epstein had a reasonable basis for continuing with the lawsuit. + +The absolute litigation privilege does not apply to prevent Epstein from defending his continuation of the original civil proceeding against Rothstein and . If Epstein sued for some statement or act performed during litigation between them, might have this privilege available as an affirmative defense to that action if the conduct occurred during that proceeding and it related to that action. However, is seeking to apply t e absolute litigation privilege to his conduct in representing clients in other actions against for work he performed that had no relationship to the furtherance of those matters. I 0 ct that forms the basis of the complaint does not relate to the proceedings in which c t took place, then the conduct would not be covered by the litigation privilege it d serve as a basis for probable cause to bring a claim. Levin, Middlebrooks, M r Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (FI + +Epstein's Complaints identified num oy nets of conduct by that were outside the parameters of the litigation 'vile . Acts that bear no relation to and are not in furtherance of a judicial proceedin o 11tCve immunity. Levin at 608. "Where judicial process is being perverted, immunity ujd pede, not further, the interests protected by the judicial privilege." Gen. Refract v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 337 F.3d 297, 312 (3d Cir. 2003). + +Epstein is wed defend by showing the jury that what appeared to be abusive litigation behavior on e s' part had no apparent relationship to the furtherance of his clients' claims exhau n hours of depositions of pilots who knew had no interaction with IIIM/ three clients, a motion to the federal court for Epstein to post a \$15 million bond because of alleged asset diversion which the court denied finding it devoid of evidence, the filing of a 234 page federal court complaint when a state court action was already pending, and requests for depositions of former President Clinton, now President Trump, and other notable friends or acquaintances of Epstein. These unusual litigation tactics combined with information known by Epstein, formed the basis for his probable cause to question whether a connection between Rothstein and existed. + +Furthermore, intends to present evidence and testimony to prove the validity of his clients' claims and the propriety of his overzealous litigation conduct of which pstein has complained to establish that Epstein had no probable cause to initiate and con is action against The Court should not allow to use the absolu • t privilege to bar Epstein from introducing contrary evidence, particularly where th an Order from Judge ruling that Epstein's Second Ame cause of action for abuse of process. vidence includes aint properly stated a + +It would be a tortured application of the Flo ' 8,4c., e Court's Levin decision to allow to bar Epstein from presenting his de n nstitutes reversible error. + +# Cie ION + +Epstein respectfully requ wards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of AdmissibC'v1 be denied. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 8, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: / L nk + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken BN 44903) Angela M. B 80) Primary: Scott6Ilinkrocklaw.com Primary:LKaraQi linkrocklaw.com Prima ucla®Iinicrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, m art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea kes Boulevard West Palm 33409 law endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiterdant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +2011 OCT 4 PM 10:00 +SHARON R. BOCK, +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION + +ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, BRADLEY [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint served August 23, 2011. The Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response, and other Memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion. The Court has also reviewed the various authorities cited by the parties. Based upon review of the above, as well as being otherwise fully advised in the in premises, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +It is well established upon Motion to Dismiss that this Court is limited to a review of the four corners of the Complaint and the well pled allegations therein. A Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits the well pled facts in the Complaint and reasonable inferences therefrom and the allegations must be construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Applying this standard to the four corners of the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Court finds that the allegations are sufficient to plead a cause of action for "abuse of process" against the Defendant: [REDACTED]. The overwhelming majority of the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss deal with the truthfulness of the allegations against the Defendant, affirmative defenses that may be available to the Defendant, [REDACTED], as well as the references outside the four corners + +of the Complaint. These matters are more appropriately the subject matterof a Motion for • Summary.Judgment and/or defense at trial: + +. Based ;upon the foregoing, the Motion to DiS.. iss is hereby denied.. + +DONE AND ORDERED fills • lay of 0 2011 at W •ain't Beach; ' . + +Palm Beach County, Florida. . . ' • • • DAVID F. • . CIRCUIT JUDGE Copy furnished:. . I • • JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Bench Lakes Blvd., West Palm eac(h, FL 33409 P e,L 33401 . `, .:.-e JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400; West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NU IK ES DIRE, One E. Broward Blyd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301\* JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., StatC 2:F;tf Lauderdale, FL 33301 .. G, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1006;afffiblk, M02116 \ Y • . + +L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., .901 PRis.Poilit West, West Palm + +# EXHIBIT B + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOLUO 7 + +# TRANSC Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +sense. If you think what just said, if it's not filed it and I con 4c MR. LINK: Your Honor, t nly makes r. Scarola e cause when I th the lawsuit, then there was Aaver robable cause. + +(FOE) (true.) (cause) (Kg( on tW•(d)(EITel)(W: - noprol5W51-e) (initiate)(this)(proceedilfcro(there) (prba151-e)(cause)(t-(5) CarrifiTrtfle (En) was proceediircO (The)(initiation)(arid)(continuation C(ID (the) procee 17114)(caused)(daTh7Eg3(t15) (5AtiTh (because) no @Yo15115re) (cause) (eriTtrelIT) (S5) (it) (15151-15) (iiritrate -d) (continued)(n1(ere)(absence p(5T) + +(MR7)(SCAROEKO @p7,)(Yor)(florcCr7) Et) is + +But th n \*nuation isn't I filed it and it s ave been eliminated that day. The sacond day after the lawsuit it's been continued. + +THE COURT: I will give you two minutes Oo wrap up. We had planned on 40 minutes. l, We are now going on 55. But again, I want to give both sides the opportunity -- + +o? + +MR. LINK: I appreciate that. + +THE COURT: I have read the materials and I have heard the arguments. I don't + +# EXHIBIT C + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## I SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +cos + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, BRADLEY J. la hereby supplements ,his previously filed Motion to Dismiss Epstein's Second Amended Complaint and Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages as follows: + +Absolute immunity must be afforded any act occurring during course of judicial proceeding, regardless of whether act involves defamatory statement or other tortious behavior, such as tortious interference with business relationship, so long as act has some relationship to proceeding. See Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie,=, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire his. Co., 639 So..2c1606 (Fla. 1994). The immunity afforded to statements made during the course of a judicial proceeding extends not only to the parties in a proceeding but to judges, witnesses, and counsel as well. Id. The litigation privilege applies in all causes of action, whether for commonlaw torts or statutory violations. See Echevarria, McCall°, Ramer, Barren & Frappier v. 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Defamatory statements made by lawyer while interviewing a witness in preparation for and connected to pending litigation are covered by the absolute + +Case No.: 5020.110800=DCMBAG + +Supplement to Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages Page 2 of 3 + +immunity conferred by the litigation privilege. See DelMonico v. Traynor, 50 So. 3d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2010), review granted, 47 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. 2010). The privilege extends to statements in judicial proceedings or those "necessarily preliminary thereto. See Stewart v. Sun Sentinel Co., 695 So.2d 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(an attorney's delivery of a 'y of a notice of claim to a reporter, which notice was a required filing prior to institutin protected by • absolute immunity). + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of oing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attache li + +Jack + +Flo No.: 169440 + +Sc rcy enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2 39 alm Beach Lakes Boulevard bei t Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +hone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +ay of August, 2011. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Supplement to [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages +Page 3 of 3 + +COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire: +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: (617) 227-3700 +Fax: (617) 338-9538 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0245aa6437408069709f35940cee61815ebe69a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650/EFTA02763650.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1034 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763650.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 21826, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN F tY EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nSECOND SUP TO MOTION IN LIMINE \nADDRESSING SCOPE OF SSIBLE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 513.3695068359375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 513.3695068359375, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JNTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 356.1510925292969, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 356.1510925292969, + 491.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 491.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.60589599609375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.60589599609375, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. The Absolute Litigation Privilege Does Not Apply to", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cie ION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 349.4546203613281, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 349.4546203613281, + 418.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 418.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.14, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 58.14, + 138.51 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 281.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC [T]he allegation ... in subparagraph h ... "Roths m e litigation team ... knew or should have known that th thrje filed cases were weak and had minimal value ... + +(11/29/17 Tr. 80:17-81:7.) + +Epstein's allegation, however, is nothing e author's subjective belief of the S, S i titt economic value of the three civil cases. v t something is "weak" falls within the classic definition of an opinion, is not apt em of fact and, thus, is not actionable even if this was a defamation case. Zorc v. 765 So. 2d 768, 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("'A false statement of fact is absolutely if there is to be recovery in a defamation action."). Fid. Warranty Services, Inc. > pte Ins. Holdings, Inc., 74 So. 3d 506, 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("A party cannot ver fof defamation based on statements which are pure opinion."). + +Cons there it testimony, pleadings, argument, and now damages expert, question: is attempting to "clear his name" by proving that individual allegations pled by Epstein in the original civil proceeding against were false. The cherry-picking of individual statements in one entire original civil proceeding to determine the truth or falsity of any statement is appropriate for a defamation action, not a malicious prosecution action governed by the existence of probable cause to initiate an original civil + +Excerpts of the November 29, 2017, hearing transcript arc attached as Exhibit D. + +proceeding. Of course, defamation for the complaint's allegations is barred by the absolute litigation privilege. Therefore, continually attempts to morph an element from the tort of defamation (whether any given statement pled by Epstein was true/false and made with good/bad motives)2 and superimpose the defamation element onto his onerous burden of proving the lack of probable cause. If allowed, this would be reversible error. + +### Expert has no Opinion on Damages + +The error is compounded by the fact that Dr. Jansen's testimon identifying internet sources that published articles that mention "So s ed on simply and Rothstein without regard to the actual damages proximately caused by t alt 1fis prosecution (if any). in this one count malicious prosecution acts Ak i may take the position that if he has no itN, damages, i.e., \$1.) Dr. Jansen's testimony is s spa to the trier of fact as required by section 90.702, Florida Statutes for either sate f d ges. y recover actual damages. ges then he is entitled to nominal + +A + +### No Testimony Related to A ges + +Dr. Jansen did not test t any actual proximately caused damages. expert r could not and did not op money, or even he h suffered attorneys' fees damages as a result of the original civil proceeding. n candidly admitted he had performed zero research on the impact the "d tements" had on any of the readership or what opinions were formed. Simply, Dr. Jansen offers nothing to assist the trier of fact or even support claim of damages t reputation was harmed, that has made less + +2 Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil); 405.9 Issues on Plaintiff's Claim, Defamation. + +allowable under Florida Standard Jury Instructions 406.12 for malicious prosecution and Florida law (reasonable expenses, including lawyers' fees, injury to reputation, mental anguish).3 + +Perhaps even more compelling, Dr. Jansen's research revealed only the number of "hits" a particular publication or news media outlet on the Internet received by a reader over an average period of 30 days covering when a Rothstein article was published. (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 50.) (Ex. E.) Critically, his research did not reveal what the viewer read on a particu bsite, i.e., whether it was an article involving Rothstein, prices, or pictures fro t recent Palm Beach gala. (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 48.) (Ex. E.) Rather, Dr. Jansen t i i is calculation of the number of hits based on a day an article was published ed e daily traffic that that particular site received Id. When questioned actual day, but were an "average over a week or 1/1 ething like that...[because] you ." further, it ,m at the "hits" were not for an lic can't look at a particular date." Id. Dr. Janse • admitted that the trafficking services he used provide an average readership overtime and "[t]he exact readership numbers arc it not typically available for the indi les." Id. at 50, 49. + +Clearly, this guesswo testi ny does not relate to actual damages when there is no article referencin thstei and concrete nexus between ' t met "hit" and someone reading or even glancing at the actual How could it when it is an "average" over time for a particular m Het website. This testimony fails to meet a basic section 90.401 relevance test. + +3also alleges special damages of "fear of physical injury to himself and members of his family; d. the loss of the value of his time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities;" in his Fourth Amended Counterclaim, but these are unsupported by Florida law. (D.E. 571 at 11). See Ware v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 1442, 1471 (M.D. Fla. 1977) and Burchell v. Bechert, 356 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 4111DCA 1978). + +#### Expert Testimony Unnecessary for Nominal Damages and Subject to 90.403 Balancing + +Recognizing the missing link of actual damages in Dr. Jansen's testimony, MI' fallback damages position is that even without actual damages, he is entitled to seek the recovery of nominal damages (i.e., \$1). If the recovery of nominal damages is even allowed by this Court, Dr. Jansen's testimony is prejudicial and certainly not helpful to the trier of fact. For nominal damages of \$1, the "nine million hits" testimony offers nothing of assistance for + +Rather, the inflammatory testimony is subject to a section 90.4 ng analysis. Section 90.403, Florida Statutes provides that, "Relevant evidence is le if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair u confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulati i S ." Here, even if there is any tangential relevance to Dr. Jansen's counting exerc bative value is far outweighed by the unfair prejudice of saying the words "~I n hits." In reality, Dr. Jansen cannot identify a single person who read an The only reason for to submit this testimony is to inflame e d prejudice them into thinking the nine million hits to a website equated to nine lion ple who read the Rothstein article, changed their mind and did not hire Edward w think he was engaged in a Ponzi scheme with Rothstein. But none of these co sions ere drawn by Dr. Jansen and his intemet counting. + +Sim ds has a failure to connect the causation dots necessary to prove damages and wa e the inflammatory and irrelevant testimony of Dr. Jansen to prejudice or confuse the jury about damages. As indicated above, Dr. Jansen's testimony only counted "hits" to a publication's website, not actual readers of the article found referencing Rothstein and To allow this irrelevant, confusing, prejudicial testimony would constitute reversible error. + +### ' Admissions of No Reputational Damage + +Furthermore, has testified that he has "resurrected" any damage that was done to his reputation: + +> On August 17, 2012, counsel, Jack Scarola, made a public statement to the media which he believes was "successful in discrediting Mr. Epstein's charges." (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 62.) (Ex. E.) + +> "With respect to reputation, I believe that over the course of the years I have done a pretty dam good job resitrielin any dam done to my reputation in this community." 5/15/1 F.) Ex. + +> "Do I believe that right now my reputation is better th been at any time in the past, yes." 5/15/13 Tr. 41.) + +> "I have done a good job of resurrecting my r where people initially believed, hey, whe something — this guy must be guilty #o S , 56.) (Ex. F.) m the point in time smoke there is fire or 5/15/13 Tr. + +> "As I said then, have I done a g ( \'01) 8 resurrecting whatever damage was done? Yes, I did." (Edwards/10 12/ Tr. 233.) (Ex. G.) + +> "I have not claimed 10/10/13 mic loss as a result of my reputation." x. G.) + +### Dr. Jansen Does Not Me ction 90.702 + +Dr. Jansen's estir n must be precluded because it has no relevance in this malicious prosecution a nly further stretches flawed defamation action not pled and not allow sen admitted that he was instructed by and his counsel to look for "defamato statements." Because expert did not testify to damages at all, his irrelevant testimony has a real danger of confusing the jury. Simply, Dr. Jansen's opinion provides no legitimate expert testimony for the jury to consider in this action. Epstein asks this Court to strike Dr. Jansen from expert witness list and preclude his trial testimony. + +#### RECORD FACTS + +On October 6, 2017, almost eight years after filing his Counterclaim, disclosed Dr. Jansen for the first time on his Sixth Amended Witness List with no explanation, as follows: + +#### EXPERT: + +159. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. + +(D.E. 1010.) The Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial required the following information at the time of listing the expert: + +- 1. The subject matter about which the expert is expected +- 2. The substance of the facts and opinions to which the c is expected to testify; +- 3. A summary of the grounds for each opinio +- 4. A copy of any written reports issued by garding this case; and +- 5. A copy of the expert's curriculum vi + +(D.E. 938.) + +produced Dr. Jansen's 4 \ ctober 20, 2017, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit II. Dr. Jansen was taske nd to the following question: + +> 9. What is the level .f diss ;motion of defaming statements associating Mr. e illegal activities o Mr. Scott Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jeffrey f ein's lawsuit against Mr. + +(Ex. H, p. 3, e.s.)( S , + +Dr, J di closed that he simply calculated the number of intemet hits which aSSOCI anis with Rothstein. In focusing his analysis to "online dissemination" of the defamatory'statements, Dr. Jansen reached the following opinion: + +> 15. The teaming statements associating Mr. J. with the illegal activities of Mr. Scott Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit against Mr. have been disseminated to at least 74 online media or other sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669,542 potential daily visitors since the lawsuit was filed to the date that I filed this report, inclusive. + +Finally, Dr. Jansen does not reference how much with the original civil proceeding. Nowhere in Dr. Jansen's report does he opine on the impact to Edw tation or character, nor does he mention shame, humiliation, mental a urt feelings. es in connection spent on + +himself is confused about the informati r. en collected. He testified at his November 10, 2017, deposition that Dr. J it was based on quantifying the him with "derogatory and defamatory statements:. (IM 11/10/17 Tr. 28 6.) . C.) Nothing is further from the truth. number of people who had seen articles + +Dr. Jansen testified at his • aken on December 1, 2017, that his opinion reached in this case was "that the def ato statements against Mr. [linking] into the Ponzi scheme of Mr. Rothstein isseminated to 74 different media sites, in 104 different articles, to 9,665,542 dail edia sitors." (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 6, e.s.) (Ex. E.) Dr. Jansen calculated the number and Rothstein's names were together in an article, but had no opinio g whether anyone actually read the articles or of any damages suffered by (Ex. E.) + +In fact, Dr. Jansen conceded he performed no research into what impact, if any, the number of publications had on anyone: + +(Ex. H, p. 5, e.s.) + +Dr. Jansen did not even consider who was responsible for disseminating information to the press. In other words, did Epstein issue a press release? Did comment to the press? Did contact the press? Did Epstein contact the press? Simply put, who disseminated to the press the alleged defamatory statements? + +3 Q. Okay. Did you do any research to see what 4 impact the statements had on any of the readership? + +18 A. No. + +(Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 64.) (Ex. E.) + +Dr. Jansen could not even identify i( c/SCIC) ersoSowho actually read any of the publications: + +5 A. No. + +6 Q. Did you do any research into whether -- what 7 opinions were formed about Mr. by anyone who 8 read any of the articles? + +9 A. No. + +10 Q. Did you do any research into whether the 11 impact on the readership in forming an opinion abut 12 Mr. was different after Mr. Scarola 13 statements in 2012 to the press? + +14 A. No. + +15 Q. When you did your research did you Interview 16 any readers that actually read one 17 you cite to in your report? articles that + +1 Q. -- right? Can yo tify one person that 2 actually read on 104 articles? + +3 A. I didn't 1 k f X a person, so no. + +(Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 6 St Ex. y E.) + +Finally, al ,iSo gh t . Jansen used the term "defamatory statements" and plugged in statements p il l . him by either Mr. or Mr. Scarola, he never made any determjq o what was defamatory or not. (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 7-8.) (Ex. E.) Candidly, Dr. + +Jansen testified: + +15 Q. Right. So the person who made the decision to 16 label whatever statements you researched defamatory was 17 not you? + +18 A. Whether they were defamatory or not was not my 19 decision. + +Id. at 8. He clarified that, "I did an IT investigation. You're asking me kind of a legal question." + +Id. Again, Dr. Jansen confirmed his opinion had nothing to do with evaluation or analysis of whether any statement was defamatory or not: + +22 Q. Right. Okay. And so whether or not that 23 statement was defamatory or not is not an analysis you 24 engaged in? + +25 A. The defamatory part, no. + +Id. at 10. If the word "defaming" was removed from the task given to hi • Ag, Id not change his work of calculating the number of times he found statements rep tt g ds. Id. at 16. + +### APPLICABLE LAW Ari N + +### I. Litigation Privilege Precludes a Defamation Actio Aulinst Epstein + +tic "The law has long recognized that judges A o parties, and witnesses should be absolutely exempted from liability to an actio d imatory words published in the course of proceedings regardless of how false , raief all the statements may be...." Debrincat v. Fischer, 217 So. 3d 68, 69 (Fla. claimed falsehood of any a amendments filed againstal and t .1. Because of this, Epstein cannot be sued for the pled in his original civil proceeding or any of the + +#### IL g" "Original Proceedin Picked Allegations + +the established litigation privilege, necessarily pled — but does not really wade3o try -- the tort of malicious prosecution. Although the tort of malicious prosecution has an ancient existence in the state of Florida, the elements have not changed. Compare Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. 109 So. 623, 626 (Fla. 1926) and Debrincat, supra. To prevail in a malicious prosecution action, a plaintiff must establish (1) an original civil proceeding; (2) present defendant was the legal cause of the original proceeding; (3) termination + +of the original proceeding constituted a bona fide termination of that proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff; (4) an absence of probable cause for the original proceeding; (5) malice on the part of the present defendant; and (6) damages as a result of the original proceeding. Debrincat, 217 So. 3d at 70 [e.s.]. + +Based on this longstanding Florida jurisprudence, there can be no narrow focus in this action on a single count, a hand-picked allegation, or a segregated paragraph original proceeding, or even a statement made or published in the press or on the • determine if it was false or true. Rather, this Court is bound by established law tqo hether probable cause existed for Epstein to file the "original proceeding." /1 + +### I l I. Da maues in a Civil Malicious Prosecution Actio are Nut Presumed + +"The gravamen" of a malicious prosecut. illis" ' 'is injury to character." Cate v. \ t Oldham, 450 So. 2d 224, 227 (Fla. 1984) a ous prosecution plaintiff may recover "damages to a person, property, or tion shown to have proximately resulted from a previous civil or criminal proc m Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. =, 92 Fla. 278, 288 (1926). Next, a mall secution plaintiff may recover damages for his shame, humiliation, mental angu hurt feelings. Ware v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 1442, 1471 (M.D. Ha. 199 e, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings flowing from [plaintiff's]etion . . . arc legitimate grounds for monetary relief in an action for malicious pros citation omitted). Third, a malicious prosecution plaintiff is entitled to the attorneys' fees he incurred in connection with the underlying action. See Burchell v. Bechert, 356 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (summary judgment improper where plaintiff had incurred attorneys' fees in underlying action). + +"It is basic hombook law that, in an action for malicious prosecution, 'the plaintiff may recover all damages that are the natural and probable consequences of the action complained + +of,' but "ItThe damages must be certain and proximate and not uncertain, contingent or speculative?" Ware v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 1442, 1470-71 (M.D. Fla. 1997)(citations omitted). + +Moreover, unlike a criminal malicious prosecution action where a malicious prosecution for criminal prosecution can be actionable "per se," a plaintiff in a civil action must prove the damages sought. See Adler v. Segal, 108 So. 2d 773, 775 (Fla. 3d DCA prosecution action based on acquittal in underlying criminal prosecution; substantial authority that a malicious prosecution is actionable alicious that "there is `certain kinds of damage necessarily follow from the wrongful prosecution itse d ill be assumed by the law to exist .... ; citing Tidwell v. Witherspoon, 21 Fla. , Ia. 1885) ("'An accusation of crime under the forms of the law or a pretense of b ' c tts, ailty man to justice is made in the most imposing and impressive manner and 41'"c , deeper injury upon the reputation of the party accused than the same words nder any other circumstances."); see also Restatement (First) of Torts ent a. ("The institution of criminal proceedings necessarily carries with it a am accusation of criminal conduct, and the rules which determine the right to or the resulting harm to reputation and distress are the same as those applicable ' ctions or defamation ... ."); compare Burchell v. Bechert, 356 So. 3d 377 (Fla. 41° D 8Xapplying Adler's holding but dicta because court already determined dama t met by record evidence of attorneys' fees incurred in defending the lawsuits). + +### A. Dr. Jansen Failed to Provide Any Opinion on Actual Damaees in a Malicious Prosecution Action + +The Florida cases cited in Section III outline the damages allowed in a civil malicious prosecution action. Dr. Jansen failed to opine on my of these categories. Significantly, Dr. Jansen offered no opinion on rcputational injury because he had no knowledge regarding whether there was any impact on the readership in forming an opinion about (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 64.) (Ex. E.) Likewise, he offered no opinion regarding whether the original civil proceeding caused shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings. He had no opinion of harm to reputation, loss of business, client departures, or any other category of potential damage. Finally, Dr. Jansen certainly had no opinion regarding incurring attorneys' fees. + +Rather, Dr. Jansen performed, in his own words, an "IT investiga by intemet searches how many times the statements given to him 114,1y calculating or his counsel appeared. (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 8.) (Ex. K) This fails to E s' burden of proving malicious prosecution damages and provides no testimon iejp the trier of fact. + +#### B. Dr.Jansen's Testimony Fails to Assist t Fact — if Allowed to Consider - Nominal Dwnages in a Malicious Pr s on Action + +;, Epstein by no means abandons his itio to argument of nominal damages in a malicious prosecution action. e Florida Standard Jury Instructions confirm Epstein's position that while " • " ages are awardable in a defamation action (405.10 f)°, they simply do not exist in icious prosecution action (406.12). However, Epstein points out that if this Co allo s t is argument to be presented to the jury, Dr. Jansen provides no helpful testim or nions — none are needed for nominal damages. Epstein will be unfairly prejudic arils is allowed to present "expert" evidence concerning the number of potential itors to a website in order to establish nominal damages under section 90.403, Florida Statutes. + +4 If you find for (claimant) but fmd that no [loss] [injury] [or] [damage] has been proved, you [should] [may] award nominal damages. Nominal damages are damages of an inconsequential amount which are awarded to vindicate a right where a wrong is established but no damage is proved. + +#### IV. Section 90.702, Florida Statutes Governs Expert Witness Testimony and Dr. Jansen Fails to Meet the Threshold Requirement of Assisting the Trier of Fact or Determining a Fact in Issue + +A trial court has wide discretion in determining which matters are proper subjects of expert opinion testimony. v. Buerman, 739 So. 2d 710, 712 (Fla. 41h DCA 1999). However, that discretion is not without limits. Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a mat ct and is generally admissible. §§ 90.401, 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017). The concept of.n, is included within the section 90.401 definition of relevancy; the evidence must material fact." Jordan cc rel. Shealey v. Masters, 821 So. 2 When evidence is offered to prove a fact which is r in issue, it is said to be immaterial. /d. Finally, "[r]elevant evidence is inad i SSe , its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejud\* ( ,\*lion o of issues, misleading the Jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evi ." .403, Fla. Stat. (2017). ve or disprove a (Fla. 4'h DCA 2002). + +submits Dr. Jan mages" expert. However, Dr. Jansen fails to assist the trier of fact in understan evidence or in determining a fact in issue, a threshold r requirement for expert t ' py to be admissible. See § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2017). Even if qualified in his of exp rtise, for an expert's opinion to be admissible, it must tend to prove or disprove in dispute. Unless Dr. Jansen's opinion is relevant to a fact or issue in the case, it tnissible. See Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Mitzel, 83 So. 3d 865, 876 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)("As a threshold matter, the expert's opinion must be relevant, that is, the evidence must prove or tend to prove a fact in issue."). Providing no opinions regarding actual or nominal damages, Dr. Jansen must be stricken as a witness and his testimony precluded. + +#### CONCLUSION + +has no actual damages. That is why he wants to try a per se defamation action. However, the litigation privilege is absolute and bars a defamation suit. Here, tried to use Dr. Jansen to say reputation has been harmed by "defamatory statements" that he found on the intemet, yet he could not opine if the statements were in fact "defamatory." He wants to put before the jury that nine million viewers all thought horrible things yet he could not say who disseminated the alleged defamatory statem 'portantly, Dr. Jansen cannot opine if anyone read the articles, or if the publice y impact on the readership in forming an opinion about or if the ' es any compensable damages. Clearly, Dr. Jansen has no relevant testimony t o e helpful to the trier of fact. Therefore, Epstein respectfully requests that this C s e report and exclude Dr. Jansen's testimony. + +> CiC)\* — + +r ?Se IN II PIIIr + +'....) + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 9, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suifk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By. / L nk + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken Angela M. M Primary: S Primary: Prim S BN 44903) B 80) ocklaw.com rocklaw.corn inkrocklaw.com Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Co unsel for Plaintiffi'Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +# s 4 RVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach s B lebard West Palm Beac 334 9 mepOsearcylpv.com jsxasearcvlai.v.com scarolateamOsearcylaw.com Co-Co Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. wards & Shipley, P.A. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsf4FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@,FLAppellateLaw.com endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel or J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc®nuriklaw.com + +Jack A. Goldberger 250 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com smahonev®aewpa.com Co-Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +,1OAlk + +CO + +...agia. + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET +OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF +[REDACTED] J. EDWARDS + +COMES NOW the Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Notice with the Court that Answers to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories propounded by the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, on December 9, 2011, have been furnished to the attorney for the Plaintiff. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail this 6/7 day of January, 2012 to all counsel on the attached list. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Answers to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories to [REDACTED] + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Attorbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Eistos & Lehrman; PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +C) + +#### ANSWERS TO PLAIN ' THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TOSS Ala + +t. Identify each:and every fact that supports the allegations set forth in your Second Amended Counterclaim, by providing: + +U + +- a. a detailed description'of the damages yon allege you:have sufferedincluding, but not limited to, those you claim have resulted in injury to your reputation, and .(2) interference in your professional relati +- b. a detailed description of the`special.damagesyd4lJlege that you have suffered, including, but not limited to: + - (I) the loss of the value o rri .diverted.from your professional responsibilities, and + - (2) the cost older? lc"'ng claims against you in this lawsuit. + +### ANSWER: + +• The identification of "e ay fact hat supports" specific allegations.would require the, disclosure of the mental i ions and thought processes of counsel and is apcorcai by the work-p uct pnvilege. Subject to add.without waiving that priVilege, has described th ial damage's he has sustained and will continue to sustain in the future in his tlY pen g counterclaim. (He has been falsely accused of immoral, unethical) Illegal conductkpugning his rofessional integrity, his professional competence, annis fitness to practice la" (Such accusations are defamatory\_per se and Florida law conclusively, (presumes the damoe that inevitably arises from such defamation. (The false accusati&rchlile) (been dissenHated repeatedly throughout not only the South Florida legal community but) (nationallytZ international v. + +In addition, has been obliged to divert time, effort, and attention from. the productive•prictice of his profession to defend against the tortuous misconduct of Epstein. Every minute diverted from his professional pursuits impeded his ability to advance the claims: and interests bf existing clients and precluded him from undertaking other and additional responsibilities. Tiine records made.available in rcs ipstein's Request to Produce.detail (at a minimum) the extent of the diversion Mr. has suffered. Cost invoices for expenditures incurred in,defencling against gpstein's misconduct have also been made available + +in response to Epstein's Request to Produce. Those damages are ongoing and continuing in nature. + +2. Explain in detail how your reputation has been. injured as a direct result: of this action against you from the filing of this action to the present. With specificity;: identify the • following: + +- a. Your alleged reputation prior to the filing of this action; +- b. My and all persons who have made statements about your r after the filing of this actioni• +- c. Any and all communications, whether verbal or wri about, your le.Mitation; and +- d. The date, manner, and substance of .communicatio r in ch.said statements .have been made about your reputation. + +### ANSWER: + +See above. + +- a. .Excellent +- b. None are presently known excepE%ps nand his numerous lawyers incl., attorneys presently engaged in advapp4ng Epstein's malicious prosecution o and his extortionate abuse o +- e. See 2b above. +- d. See the pleadings, .film %n-the-record statements 'made in this case and the RRAbankruptcy + +3. .Exp foal,tail how the 'filing ; of this action against you has interfered with your .professional rela ms. and for each such relationship: + +- a. its nature and-the.person with whom you have or had the relationship; b\_ ify exactly how the relationship has been interfered with; entify eibltpeiten with knowledge of the interference;. and 'identify actual damages as a result of such interference.: + +#### ANSWER: + +See answer to #1 above. Persona With knowledge of the interference ineltalp the parties to this action, all present and prior attorneys of record, all persons on the certificate of: service of Epstein's Motion. to Depose .Rothstein filed in the RRA banlauptcy proceedings; all attorneys, judges, and observers in Court 'on every occasion that + +i + +() argument has been presented in support of Epstein's spurious claims ag , all persons exposed to media coverage of Epstein's spurious claims against + +Actual damages sustained ba include:. + +- the costs incurred in defending against Epstein's outrageous misconduct; +- the value oa' diverted time and attenliali. +- the value of compensation for the injury to a' professional reputation as liquidated by a jury. + +4. Identify each and every witness that has knowledge of the damages you seek to recover in this action, including but not limited to your employer, your partners, your family members, associates, colleagues, referral sources, end clients and, for each, describe the nature of his or her knowledge. + +#### ANSWER: + +)' Steve Jaffe, Gary =, Seth Lehrman have knowledge of the extent to which ' tim nd attention were diverted by Epstein from gainful professional pursuits, ' professional reputation, competence, integrity, and character. + +Former Federal Judge Paul Cassell has knowledge of the same matters described above. Earleen Cote, Esq. has knowledge of the same matters described above. + +5. W2iplairThe basis for your claim that your reputation has been injured by) egations against you in this actio—ni. + +### ANSWER: + +051ibmation per sc.) + +6. Explain the method by which you have distinguished injury to your reputation resulting directly from allegations against you in this action from injury to your reputation resulting from your having been a partner it he defunct firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler. + +#### ANSWER: + +Wpstem's malicious, unsupported, unsupportable, false accusations of (knowing involvement and active participation in a massive Ponzi scheme singled Mr: + +art from among all other innocent RRA employees. Those accusations\_were.thel ply source falsely linking Bradley Edwards to Rothstein's criminal enterprise,\_and) allegations is 17ibasis to believe that EdwardsLimpecciti@ rofessional reputation would have been tarnished by is\_ netemployment\_with (Irelh-gfaiRosenfelarrAilE) Indeed, the vast majority of RRA employees were presumed innocent and have escaped any taint from their employment with the firm. + +7. Identify all fees and costs that you have incurred for thet nse of this action against you. + +#### ANSWER: + +See MI contemporaneous production. cos + +8. If you have awritten engagement agreement with the firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. describe the date of the agreement, the scope of services and the terms on which your counsel are epmpensated. + +#### ANSWER: + +i See • S + +Objection. Attorney work-product statutorily restricted communications with law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities. Irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. . + +28. 'Identify the basis for your claim that others still persist in prosecuting claims against the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify the persons still prosecuting claims against the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant or with knowledge of the persons still prosecuting claims against him, including names, datcs of contact with such persons, substance of communication, etc. + +#### ANSWER: + +Objection. Attorney work-product and statutorily restricted communications with law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities. Irrelevant, immaterial, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + +29. Provide support for your claims in Paragraphs 9 and 25 of the Second Amended Counterclaim in which you allege the sole purpose of filing civil claims was never to recover monetary damages, that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Jeffrey Epstein knew he never suffered monetary damages, that he knowingly asserted baseless and unsupportable claims, etc. + +### ANSWER:. + +Sea ' Motion for Summary Judgment and attachments. + +30. Identify all clients and list all payments made to clients i O 143la'on with their cases against the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. + +#### ANSWER: + +Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial and not reasonably calculated :to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. However, to the extent deemed relevant, since Epstein directly settled the claims and made the payments, the information requested i§readily available to him. + +31. Identify all third parties (non-clients) who received or made payments in connection with the client cases or purported client cases against the Plaintiff/CounterDefendant Jeffrey Epstein and\*with specificity: (I) explain the relationship of such third parties; (2) list the payments made to or by each; and (3) list thedate of payments and purpose of payments. Your answer should include without limitation all investigators, witnesses, referring persons, referring attorneys, outside counsel, outside experts. It should also include any and all payments made to or by investors in any of the client cases against the Plaintiff/CounterDefendant Jeffrey Epstein or payments made by or to any other person in connection with the client cases. + +### • ANSWER: + +Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + +32. Identify all attorneys who worked on the client cases against Plajntiff/CounterDefendant Jeffrey Epstein, includi at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler; the attorneys at not limited to, the., formerly Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL; outside attorneys and referring attorneys. + +### ANSWER: + +M , Paul Cassell, Matt Weissing, Steve Jaffe ril Berger rendered'substantive services in the prosecution of claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Adler waa,in attendance at multiple depositions but was not an active participant. + +33. Identify all members of support staff, paralegals, secretaries, investigators, etc. who worked on client c c a nst the Plaintiff/CounterDefendant Jeffrey Epstein, including but not limited to offices t e attorneys formerly at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler; the office of UJaffe, Weissing, Fistos B7Lelnman, PL; and offices of outside attorneys and referring attorneys. + +#### ANSWER: + +Shawn Gilbert, attic Black, Jacquie Jol illiamson, Susan Sterling, Mike Fisten, Pat Pat + +34. Identify any agreethents, proposals, offers, discussions, negotiations, etc. related to the sale or development of any movie, book, or other rights or similar deals. + +### ANSWER: + +None + +0 + +U + +*[Handwritten signature]* +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) +PALM BEACH +COUNTY OF BROWARD. ) + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6th day of January, 2012 +by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], who is personally known to me or who has produced. +\_\_\_\_\_ (type of identification) as identification and who did/did +not take an oath. + +*[Handwritten signature]* + +Notary Public +State of Florida at Large +My Commission expires: +Commission No: + +![](_page_32_Picture_13.jpeg) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XMCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, + +J. L.M., individually, individually, and Defendant(s). Co + +### NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO114ERROGATORIES + +J. by and through his undd ee₹ssiig \i", counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Corkpropounded by Jeffrey Epstein on September 5, 2017, and said Answers to Interrogato . es,ve been furnished to the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY tilt a, to all Counsel on the attached list7flis e and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve `511" day of ,..C.tolPe.e' , 2017. + +AROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 16944 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_searolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-3 1n51 3- + +Attorneys for J. + +U + +35. Please describe with particularity any and all evidence, circumstances and events upon which you rely in asserting that your reputation was damaged as alleged in your Counterclaim, including, without limitation, specifically describing how that damage is attributable to Epstein's lawsuit against you. + +RESPONSE: (The allegations of Epstein's maliciously filed Complaint are defamatory per se.) + +36. Please explain in detail the amount of time required to be diverted from your professional responsibilities including, but not limited to, the time lost, each date on which the time was lost, the case/matter on which you would have otherwise spent the time, your billable hourly rate, if any, you allege to have lost, and for each case/matter identified, please provide the amount of income derived by you, your firm, or any entity acting on your behalf in that matter. Please detail all other evidence, methods and calculations on which you intend to rely to quantify the damages you claim are attributable to time diverted from your professional responsibilities as alleged in your Counterclaim. + +RESPONSE: Time diverted from Bradley [REDACTED] professional responsibilities is reflected in previously produced time records and will be updated prior to the expiration of discovery. Counter-Plaintiff, however, objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the number of interrogatories propounded by the Counter-Defendant, including subparts, substantially exceeds the maximum number permitted without leave of court. + +37. For each payment or distribution made by you, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Alder, [REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other lawyer and/or law firm to Beth Williamson in connection with any claims asserted against Jeffrey Epstein state, identify, and describe the amount of the payment, the date of payment, the source of the payment proceeds, the reasons for the payment, and any promises, contracts, agreements, understandings and arrangements regarding said payment, and all amendments, modifications and supplements of the same, pursuant to which such payment was made. + +RESPONSE: Objection: The information sought is not relevant, material or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The interrogatory seeks to invade the economic privacy of the Counter-Plaintiff and all others encompassed within the extraordinarily broad scope of Definition #5 of Counter-Defendant's Interrogatories. Reference to "the period in question" is vague and ambiguous. + +Signature of Answering Party + +STATE OF ) + +COUNTY OF ) + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th day of +September, 2017 by Brad Edwards who is personally known to me or +who has produced \_\_\_\_\_ (type of identification) as identification +and who did/did not take an oath. + +![](_page_36_Picture_14.jpeg) + +![]() + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLUAt, + +VIDEOTPA& SITION + +LEY + +C :Iren on Behalf of Plaintiff + +O + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard .T West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +\,'"; + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 2 A Just an anxious feeling to get this over with. + +3 4 5 Q And you had that anxious feeling every single day from December 2009 through today November 10th, 2017? + +6 C) 0 A (The)(more) reminders utjit). sa) (have) (they (arid) (th-e) (frd•t) (that)(there)( CM)(looms (this) fats (allegation (ove r) that is (clTTETV) + +9 10 • You said it looms this false ation. What is the false allegation loomi er your head? + +11 12 13 14 A That I was a partici • a Ponzi scheme with one of the individuals ght be the most S hated person in South F a, especially amongst our profession. + +15 4 Mr. + +16 A Rig Ro0)97.7.' + +17 18 19 Q ut why is there an allegation hanging over your he case against you was dismissed in 20 ect? + +20 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. Which case? + +21 y MR. LINK: + +22 23 Q The case against you by Mr. Epstein was dismissed in 2012, was it not? + +24 A Right. The case was dismissed. + +25 Q Five years ago the case was dismissed, 1 that those things are not true. + +2 3 4 The lawyers i practice with know that those things are not true It's the rest of the world that -- + +6 8 9 10 11 12 (170 A Your reputation is made up of what soc'e y thinks of you. The people who don't know me i on y got a snapshot of this person -- is Rothst co-conspirator in a Ponzi scheme and co e to spread that message from that point in ti rward, whether it's 9 million people or 100 m eople, my reputation right there suff ges that, gmam) (araxnmoury Eft@EatETIWeoP7) @Mturouie). + +15 16 17 18 Q So the r he nameless, faceless folks that you don kno that you have never met, never had cone ations with, never interacted with, who are --c hat ave impacted your reputation. + +19 l y Your question is way too extreme. + +20 21 So you told me it's anyone who knows you, knows for sure that there's nothing -- + +22 A I didn't tell you that. + +23 Q You didn't? + +24 A No. Who knows me well. + +25 Q They have to know you well, right? + +Q II, okay. + +1 testimony. + +2 Q I understand. He's the only one that + 3 complied with the disclosure rules and has a report, + 4 but the rest are listed as under the actual expert + 5 witness section. + +6 A I hear you. + +7 Q So in looking at -- do you have the report + 8 in front of you, which we just marked as Exhibit 22 + 9 for Bernard Jansen, PhD? + +10 A Yeah. + +11 Q When was Mr. Jansen retained? + +12 A I don't know. + +13 Q Your counterclaim has been pending since + 14 December 2009, correct? + +15 A Yes. + +16 Q Do you know why Mr. Jansen did not provide + 17 a report until 2017? + +18 A Don't know. + +19 Q Do you know why Mr. Jansen was not listed + 20 on any exhibit list from the beginning of the case -- + 21 the first -- I think it was five -- maybe five or six + 22 witness list to the court? + +23 A (with certainty) (I) (don't) (know) (I) (know) (the) + (24) (types) (of) (things) (he) (does) (And) (typically) (his) (report) (is) + (25) (most) (useful) (right) (before) (trial) (because) (it) (is) (a) + +1           (quantification of the number of people who have seen + 2           (the articles associated (-- depending on the type of + 3           (lawsuit in which he's testifying (-- with the derogatory + 4           (and defamatory statements, so -- + +5           Q          Dr. Jansen -- + +6                   MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. I'm sorry. + +7                   You interrupted Mr. [REDACTED]. + +8           BY MR. LINK: + +9           Q          Did I, Mr. [REDACTED]? + +10           A          Yes. I was almost finish, though. + +11                   So his report can't be completed until -- + 12           well, you want it to be complete as close up to the + 13           trial as possible so that you can have the final + 14           numbers. + +15           Q          I understand you can update reports. But + 16           you could have retained him at any time, because + 17           there were other trial settings and there would have + 18           been a witness list, right? + +19           A          Well, we have been on appeal for a while, + 20           but -- + +21          Q          I understand. But you've had five trial + 22           settings. + +23                   In any event, you have used Mr. Jansen + 24           before, correct? + +25          A          I have used Mr. Jansen before. As a + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS + +DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017 + +TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m. + +PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C + +t Palm Beach, Florida + +BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept) + +Sonja D. + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Mr. Epstein? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola, thank you for your patience. You may proceed, sir. + +Thank you, Ms. Rockenbach and Mr. Link, for your written and oral presentations. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, YoMR' Honor. If you don't mind, I'm going to O stand at the podium that says, Plain iff + +Your Honor, there is a ver f damental disagreement between presen --1 for Mr. Epstein and Mr. Edw ou heard Mr. Link say -- and k I took down the quote exactly -- e never challenged that these t es were legitimate cases. + +can understand why it is that is point in the litigation, Mr. Link r es that they had never challenged that A;"these three cases were legitimate cases. + +(But the fact of the matter is that) + +was sued for ginning upaj (fabricating, constructing those three cases, (and others, as a knowing participant in) (Florida's largest ever Ponzi scheme\ that + +to interrogatories in the state court matters, E.W. and L.M., and listed additional high-profile witnesses that would allegedly be called at trial, including, but not limited to:" And then various individuals are identified. + +And then paragraph 41. The sole purpose of the scheduling of these (:: depositions was, again, to pump up t ICe'c ses to investors. There is no evi. Alto date that any of these individua r have Akst -lic e any knowledge regarding 's ivil actions." \ + +THE COURT: e record, that's a quote from pj ap 41, as opposed to argument. + +MR 'tIOAROLA: Thank you. Sir. I'm sctS, + +0 If we go to page 18 of the complaint, ubparagraph H. "Rothstein" and again, this is a quote. + +÷s + +("Rothstein and the litigation team knew) or should have known that their three filed cases were weak and had minimal value for (the following reasons.") + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Those reasons are listed. + +(Again, Questioning the legitimacy o0 + +(Ehe claims. + +Page 21, paragraph 44. "The actions described in paragraph 42 above herein had no legitimate purpose in pursuing the civil" litigations (sic) "against Epstein, but rather were meant to further the fraudu scheme and criminal activity of Roth + +Paragraph 46, the last li RRA and the attorneys in the civil + +Please remember, th action is a defined term in the . It's L.M., E.W. and Jane Do claims -- "needed to create a fic t t included extraordinary damages. a r, the actual facts behind her act ould never support such ordinary damages." + +0 Going down to the last sentence in s ubparagraph A. "Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against Epstein, one of L.M.'s many johns during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to RRA's investors." + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +hear what Mr. Link is trying to suggest so that you can formulate your argument. + +MR. SCAROLA: I know exactly -- + +THE COURT: I will give him a minute. + +MR. LINK: I don't want to take long. + +said I just want to clarify, because Mr. Scarola that we have conceded that nothing waS fabricated. + +0 What was fabricated was not the fil ng of the three lawsuits in 2008. as that there were other claims in to those three, and that one of ree settled for 30 million, and at r. Epstein had offered \$200 mil hose are the things that we were4 about during that time period. C + +THE COURT: (Well, the allegation,) + +(t drugh, in subparagraph H, which was already) read into the record -- I will read it) + +( Lt + +ain, quote, Rothstein and the litigation) + +team -- parenthetically Mr. Scarola has + +(a\_iggested that the litigation team is) + +defined as Mr. -- returning to the + +quoted provisions -- knew or should have) + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +and had minimal value -- and for the reasons + +(I have already\_gone through in addressing) + +(What I think is going to be relevant as to) + +those three individuals if the contention is + +(still that these claims were not legitimate) + +(during the period of time that Mr. Rothsteirj + +ad Mr. worked to ether). • + +MR. LINK: I just want to make thi AS' + +C2) distinction. I don't want to beat this + +horse too much. If you look a + +paragraph before that parag talks + +about the \$500 million + +THE COURT: ke that in + +consideration. + +MR. L it's relative to that. + +Second r Honor -- + +OLA: I'm sorry. I would like, + +e few minutes remaining, to be able to + +some points before -- + +THE COURT: Mr. Link, I am going to ask + +you, then, to save your commentary for + +rebuttal. + +MR. LINK: I just was trying to answer + +your questions. + +# EXHIBIT E + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 50-2009CA040 800XXXXXXBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, +vs. +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF +DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN +Taken on Behalf of the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +DATE TAKEN: Friday, December 1, 2017 +TIME: 9:23 a.m. - 11:21 a.m. +PLACE: Law Offices of [REDACTED] Pottinger, LLC +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Examination of the witness taken before: + +Iliana Lugo, Court Reporter +Palm Beach Reporting +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +APPEARANCES + +For the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +BY: SCOTT J. LINK, ESQ. +KARA B. ROCKENBACH, ESQ. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +For the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, BARNHART +& SHIPLEY, P.A. +BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. +7139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Also Present: + +ROBERT BARFIELD, Videographer, Visual Evidence + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +- - - + +THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Today is the 1st day of December 2017. The time is 9:23 a.m. This is the videotaped deposition of Doctor Bernard Jansen in the matter of Epstein versus Rothstein and [REDACTED]. This deposition is being held at 425 North Andrews Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. + +My name is Robert Barfield. I'm the videographer from Visual Evidence, Inc. + +Would the attorneys please announce their appearances for the record? + +MR. LINK: Yes. + +MR. SCAROLA: My name is Jack Scarola. I'm counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff, [REDACTED]. And Mr. [REDACTED] is also present. + +MR. LINK: Scott Link and [REDACTED] behalf of Mr. Epstein. + +(Thereupon, Doctor Bernard J. Jansen was duly awarn.) + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to offer a stipulation to you. And that is that rather than go through the details of the witness' background, training, and experience, we would agree that his curriculum vitae will be marked as an exhibit to this deposition and any portions of it may be read by + +1 either party as if those entries in the CV were +2 responsive to appropriate questions during the +3 course of the deposition. + +4 MR. LINK: That's acceptable. +5 MR. SCAROLA: Good. Thank you. +6 MR. LINK: Shall we go ahead and mark that as +7 Exhibit 17? + +8 MR. SCAROLA: That's a good idea. +9 (Thereupon, the document referred to was +10 marked Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 1 for identification.) +11 THEREUPON: + +12 DOCTOR BERNARD J. JANSEN +13 was called as a witness and, having been previously duly +14 sworn and responded "I do," was examined and testified +15 as follows: + +16 DIRECT EXAMINATION +17 BY MR. LINK: + +18 Q. Mr. Jansen, would you please take a look at +19 what we just marked as Exhibit 1 and tell us what that +20 is, please. + +21 A. This is my CV, my curriculum vitae. +22 Q. And is that current through today? +23 A. I could check every page but it's a fairly +24 recent CV. + +25 Q. Okay. Mr. Jansen, tell me what your opinions + +1 are that you have reached in this case. + +2 (A) (The my opinion is that the defamatory) +3 (Statement against McEdwards leaking into the Ponzi) +4 (Scheme of McRothstein were disseminated in 174) +5 (Ifferent media sites in 104 Ifferent articles in) +6 (7655742 3411 you did visit it on) +7 Q. You just used the words "defamatory + +8 statements." Did you make a determination that there +9 was a statement in some publication that was defamatory? + +10 A. I was given the gist of the statements that -- +11 the statements that linked Mr. [REDACTED] to the Ponzi +12 scheme of Mr. Rothstein, and then I checked for the +13 explicit statement, those particular statements in each +14 of the 104 articles. + +15 Q. I understand that, but I'm talking about the +16 word "defamatory." + +17 "Defamatory" is a legal word; is it not? + +18 A. I don't know whether it's a legal word or not. + +19 Q. Well, what does it mean? When you were doing +20 your work you said you used "defamatory statements." +21 And I want to know what you concluded was a defamatory +22 statement and we'll talk about -- + +23 A. Sure. + +24 Q. -- the credentials you have to make that +25 determination for -- to say that to a jury. + +1 A. As I outlined in my report in one of the +2 paragraphs that we can go through, I outlined explicitly +3 what the statements were that I used. + +4 Q. I understand what a statement is. I don't +5 have any problem with you doing research. The research +6 that you did makes sense to me. If you plugged in a +7 sentence and wanted to see how many times it was used, +8 that makes sense to me. + +9 A. Uh-huh. + +10 Q. (I dirty in the understand that language and the) +11 (Sociation you had chabout as a statement linguist for famatory) +12 (And I want to know how you had chabout that what was) +13 (Statement you were treasuring in was the defamatory) +14 (Statement) + +15 (A) (The defamatory statement was something that) +16 (was provided by a citation in a report that it was these) +17 (Statements that I had in the post of the the ponzi scheme) +18 (Statement that I had was provided in med) +19 (In a) (Say you were told by a little media ward) +20 (Statement that I had was they thought was) +21 (Defamatory) + +22 (A) (These were the statements I was told in 1668) +23 (Continue) +24 (A) (Okay) (So that you have to say that in fact) + +25 (A) (Okay) (So that you have to say that in fact) + +1 (What is defamatory?) + +2 (A) (No) +3 Q. All right. Is there a way that you could +4 describe the statement from your words what you were +5 doing? Because the word "defamatory" is not your word, +6 is it, in this report? That's one of the lawyer's +7 words. + +8 A. Well, it was a description I used for those +9 particular statements. It was provided to me, what +10 those statements were. + +11 Q. Okay. So you chose the word "defamatory +12 statements"? + +13 A. I didn't say that, no. I was provided that +14 these are the defamatory statements to look for. + +15 Q. (It had) (So that previously what was the defamatory) + +16 (And that was a statement you treasured and defamatory was) + +17 (No yours) + +18 (A) (What the lawyer were defamatory to be called no the) + +19 (Sociation) +20 Q. Okay. Is there something about my question +21 that's causing you pause? + +22 A. A little bit, yeah. (It is not) + +23 (Investigation) You're asking me kind of a legal +24 question. + +25 Q. Uh-huh. + +1 A. And I'm just telling you that I was provided +2 these statements. + +3 Q. And the reason I'm asking is you told me your +4 opinion was about defamatory statements. And that has a +5 lot of significance to it. And I want to understand who +6 determined what statements were defamatory, whether you +7 did that or the lawyers for Mr. [REDACTED] did that. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, repetitious, asked +9 and answered. + +10 A. Yeah, your question is asking kind of two +11 questions. + +12 BY MR. LINK: + +13 Q. You may answer both. Go ahead. + +14 A. All right. The statements linking Mr. [REDACTED] +15 to this Ponzi scheme by Mr. Rothatein, I mean, those +16 were statements I looked for. I looked for the explicit +17 statement, you know, those particular expression of +18 those statements. At -- the aspect of whether they were +19 defamatory or not from a legal aspect is not within my +20 purview. + +21 Q. Right. Okay. So that must mean that the +22 language "defamatory statement" was provided to you by +23 either Mr. Scarola or Mr. [REDACTED]. + +24 A. Well, yeah -- yes, that particular subject +25 matter was provided, yes. + +1 Q. Okay. So then what are the sub-categories of +2 opinions that you have? + +3 A. Well, we can go over my report but -- and I'll +4 provide those. + +5 Q. I have your report, but I want you to tell me +6 what opinions you're planning to provide to the jury. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: And you should understand that +8 to the extent that it assists you in providing an +9 accurate response to any question that is asked +10 during the course of this deposition, you're free +11 to refer to anything that you'd like to. + +12 I have a copy of your report here. If you +13 want to look at that, you are free to do that. As +14 long as Mr. Link knows what it is you're looking +15 at, if it helps you to give honest and accurate +16 answers, you're free to look at that. + +17 MR. LINK: Jack, I don't agree to that. I +18 don't want you to hand him exhibits -- + +19 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry that -- + +20 MR. LINK: -- and tell him what he can do. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry that you don't +22 agree -- + +23 MR. LINK: I don't. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: -- but that happens to be a +25 matter of law. He has a right to refresh his + +1 Q. Okay. Do you have any other opinions in this +2 case other than the one you just shared with me? + +3 A. Well, there's supporting opinions that I +4 outline in my report but that's the major -- that's what +5 I was asked to do, dissemination of these defamatory +6 statements. + +7 Q. So -- okay, so you keep saying "defamatory +8 statements." And when you say that, the reason it +9 causes me concern is whether a statement is defamatory +10 is for a judge or jury to decide. + +11 A. Okay. Then maybe I'm -- + +12 Q. You're not the judge or jury in this case. + +13 A. I mean [REDACTED] that statement in a colloquial sense +14 rather than the legal sense you're using it in. + +15 Q. So what we're really talking about, though, is +16 a statement and how many times that statement was picked +17 up by the press; is that right? + +18 A. The press -- yes, it was available on-line -- + +19 Q. Do you -- + +20 A. -- a particular type of subject matter for +21 these particular statements, yes. + +22 Q. Right Okay And so whether or not that +23 statement was defamatory or not is not on analysis you +24 engaged in? + +1 recollection to refer to anything that he wants to +2 during the course of the deposition as long as you +3 are aware of the fact that he's referring to +4 something and have a chance to look at it yourself. + +5 MR. LINK: I don't want to argue with you. +6 Please let me take my deposition the way I want to. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: You're free to do that. + +8 BY MR. LINK: + +9 Q. So what I'm asking is what your opinions are. + +10 A. Uh-huh. + +11 Q. And we'll get to your report. And if you +12 don't remember something, just tell me you don't +13 remember. + +14 But, I want to know as you sit here what +15 you're going to tell the jury. And I understand opinion +16 number one is that you took a statement given to you by +17 Mr. [REDACTED] and Mr. Scarola and you did your research to +18 see how many times you could find it in the press; +19 right? + +20 A. A statement, yes, or similar statements that +21 related to it, yes. + +22 Q. Got it. + +23 What other conclusions or opinions did you +24 reach other than that one? + +I that support that particular opinion. + +1 Q. T'm asking what are they, sir. + +A. Okay. Well, that the statements were + +1 distributed to 74 different on-line sites, that I + +I calculated the traffic to those particular sites. The + +6 sites that I couldn't verify the traffic or didn't feel + +IJ outlined 12 different steps of why that is a + +I, exanples in ag report. + +I) Q. Okay. So that just sounds like the number" + +t4 that you found when you did your singular opinion, which + +Is le to See where this statement provided to you by the + +:4 lawyers was replicated in the press, and that's the + +I, :umber of times that you saw that; is that right? + +Is Well, that was one of my mein opinion but you + +zt Yeah. + +22 -- was a conservative estimate. + +zi Okay. My other opinions? + +/4 We can go through paragraph by paragraph in + +I had reliable traffic numbers t didn't include. The + +104 article", I looked through each of those articles + +for defamatory statements, using that colloquially. I + +conservative estimate, that 9,635,542, and give several + +asked for the sub-opinions and rve outlined it, that + +9,645,54? -- + +the report but I gave you the -- + +with in deciding whether you would be retained in thl, + +> case was Mr. Sear011, Mt Mr. + +That is correct. + +4 Did you have contact with Mr. I llabent + +▪ **the content of your report?** + +**Yea.** + +**And did you have contact with Mr.** + +O about what -- the way your report le written? + +• A. Well, yes, he -- It. reviewed a draft + +10 of the report. + +AM gave you contents on the writing of the + +52 report? + +11 A. Yee, loseleally. + +la Q. Made ewe changes to + +IS Made sore suggestions + +16 O. Okay. And di s suggestion'? + +17 A. Meat of t noes, yea. and there + +le was one remorse tion t t asked it I could include + +If in rty report. + +O. d yoe do that? tl + +Pt 1 10 So you took his wording changes end you + +54 • lads asking you to do so; is that right? + +a W lel change to your report lased on + +A. he ashid if T could include something and 1 + +Q. That's it? + +A. -- broadest \*Pinion' + +1 0. Okay. When were YOU re case, + +sir? + +1 A. By October 2017. on r atOut + +MR. LIMA: Okay Let sad and mark the + +report as Exhibit + +I, •• follows:) + +It the document referred to was + +If ma Is Exhibit Kunber 2 for identification.) + +I/ BY + +Ready? lot's turn to page 3, sir. On page J + +thine what your assignment was. + +ze And who provided you with the assignment? Who + +" gave you what's in paragraph 9? + +4 A. That would be Mr. Sterols. + +Q. Mr. Sterols gave you paragraph 9? + +Yeah. It's a -- and [ added sone words to the + +thing to wake it more in line with whet I had to do but + +dr that's basically just to looking for -- + +(Thereupon. • e1 iscussion was held off + +the record, which deposition continued as + +Okay. + +A. -- those types of words. + +Q. All right. So the person that you had contact + +4 Did they give you any definition of what + +a A. The -- again, this 'defaming' is kind of + +felt it was in line, so yes. + +0. Okay. So back CO paragraph 9 for a second, + +The question that you were asked by Mr. \$00,018 and + +Mr. is: What la the level of diSSeednatiOn of + +defaming statements? + +"defaming' means? + +legal thing you're harping on here. I' use it in + +colloquial expression. And they gave Oa What the + +statements I was to look for. + +Right. So is the word "defaming" here really + +superfluous from your standpoint? What you really + +needed were the Stated/WIGS and not an adjective to + +describe then for you to do your work? + +For WO to do my work? + +Q. Yes, sir. + +S. =OttSeSiSSCSa + +CaSheOrd=littatlira:Zialn:XV/raberen41 IchtliThavalangta2bCFrirStraretiantrYttOidlnata 0 + +troorkOsoulsCit3 + +?i PiCIDDgJLWlR12.110tattatatir + +ittnildnICTbaog0Y2dorle3 boot at + +Q. Okay. Turn to page SA plea". paragraph 15, if you would. + +A. Yes. Q. ft says: The defaming statements associating 1 Mr. with the illegal activities of 4 Mr. Rothstein..." Do you see that? A. Yes. 0. What is the statement that you searched for? 4 A. Well, it was -- it varied slightly, you know. 1 document to document, but it was an association with -- '0 that Mr. was somehow knowingly involved with the • illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein. • 0. What was the word search that you used? :1 A. Well, again, tO find the articles Or the ,4 statements in the articles. • O. I want to know the word search that you were • looking for. As I understand your assignment. it was to 1 take the connection of Mr. with Mr. Rothstein '3 and Mr. Rothateln's illegal activities and prepare a :3 report and identify every place that there was • 00 reference to Mr. and Mr. Rothstein and the 2: illegal activities. is that right? A. You're going to have to say that ono more 2) time. 04 Q. Okay. 23 Sorry. + +? c 8 O. r thought I understood that the nment • that you had was to \*imply take Mr. Ro et 1 Mr. and the concept of il tiv es. an: 4 then \*earth and see where In t 1 newspapers, that COmbinatiOn sts. MR. SCAROLA: Ps god ject to the aiSeaaratteritati f the answer that was a previously given, h eluded • reference to the fact the r dloy r rds was a knowing participant :0 in t fl 1 activities. Thank you for that clarification. wn" A: You're welcome. ) , I can take your question two different • One, what I used to look at these :3 nts. and those I outline in my report. ti BY NR. LINK: Q. Oh-huh. • A. And then the actual statements in each of .) these documents. And those statements vary slightly, 20 you know, article to article. But it was somehow there • I as a reader of these articles would -- that the 32 article expressed that Mr. was somehow knowingly 'I involved In these illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein. 24 0. Okay. So is that the key to this? The ,3 article needed to show that Mr. was knowingly + +I involved with Mothstein's illegal activities? Is 2 that -- Ia that right? A. That Mr. was involved with these illegal activities and that so -- you're writing it down like that was the only natant I searched for. Rut, as I said, in each of these 104 sickles that verbiage changed likely article to article. Q. Okay. Well, Mr. Scarola corrected ne and added the word "knowing.' That's why I added the Weid 10 to my sentence. it Was that not a word that was important to y3 12 in determining whether the statenent re mapposed 11 to fird was included in an article 14 A. 1 don't understand t IS 0. Well. 1 just asked the statement that 16 you were asked to loca tines it was 17 disseminated was t like this: • it le was know' g with Rothstein', It activity. 20 A. n going to refer you to ParagraPh 15 21 that ea: Defaming statements associating 22 illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein... So ether it was Mr. knew whether or not was not germane to your research? A. that's not what T said. + +'4140 S31 C + +O. Well, I just read what you wrote here and it just \*aye associating him. It doesn't say whether he knew or didn't know. And I'm trying to really understand if you were looking for articles that simply say: and Rothstein. And Rothstein has illegal activity. Or you 1 were looking for articles that said: Mr. was • a known participant in the Ronal scheme. 9 MR. SCAROLA: Object to the form of the 10 question as it excludes the possibility that both IS were included. 12 11 MR. LINK: Good coaching. 14 BY MR. Link: 13 IS 11 Q. A. coaching. Go right ahead. t don't understand the comment about the le Q. No, It was just for Mr. Scarola's purposes. 19 A. Okay. Could you repeat the question? 20 Q. I probably can't. I don't remenber what. ' 21 asked now, but I'll come up with another question. 22 MR. SCAROLA: I'd be happy to help, if you'd 2/ like -- 24 MR. !JIM: No, no -- 23 MR. SCAROLA: -- cause 1 remember it. + +MR. LINK: -- I'll figure it out . 1 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. MR. LINK: I'll figure it out. DY NB. LINK: Q. I'm trying to understand what was important t " you in doing your search -- Uh -huh. Q. -- because I understand the nowhere. That ) makes sense to me. That's sort of the easy part of '0 this. What I'm trying to understand is what you were tt searching to find, so that I can then talk to you about whether the articles you located satisfy the search 'I request you were seeking. Does that make sense? And when I read your sentence in paragraph IS, 'I if that's what you were looking for, then whether Mr. knew or didn't know would not be important ') to you in your search. :1 A. Malt. I -- you know, well, you can argue and 20 interpreter It how you would like. But as T explain In IS ay report, you know. 1 looked In these -- in the '2 articles where that Mr. was involved, knew 23 stout, contributed to, that somehow had to get across in those articles to se. 21 Q. Okay. + +A. So the exact -- yeah. 0. Involved, knew about -- and Involved, knew Wee O. Somehow involved. 1 t was? MR. LINK: Jack, do r? Contributed to. MR. LINK: Co to. 1 about. involve!, knew about, contribute] Amnia: Contributed to. 3 : Got it. Thank you. K: Okay. So -- so then you were focused on not .4 just that Mr. was employed at the Rothstein firm and that the Rothstein firm was involved in illegal 'm activities. You were looking for articles that 3 connected Mr. to that illegal activity. ;a A. That is a very good example. Yes, there were 'I articles that, for example, said that Mr. was 22 employed in Hr. Rothstein's firm, and those articles I 'I didn't include. It had to be somehow that he was 2, somehow associated with this. 2) O. With the illegal activities? + +A. Kith the illegal activities. 0. Get it. Okay. Al: right. Kill you turn to page 13. pleas.. 4 admen you were identifying articles in which there was 000000000 rade to Its. Re.thitain.\$ illegal activities and " Kr. Involvement or contribution to or knowledge about those activities, did it ratter to you where that information cart [ran? And here is Haat I mean. Did you exclude, for 10 example. press statertnts by Km. Scarola? S3 A. Well, there's two west:ono there. Lot ma II deal with the last one. I roan, : don' recall any IS press -- looting at any press tele Kr I , ao I don't think I included th IS O. How about statements press by 56 Kr. Scarola? 17 r your other le taxation, which ght now I forgot. IS O. Okay. deal with the question of when 20 you we 21 22 want to rake sure I answer your • -- it actually was a very good We're going to get back to it. DM. SCAJIOIA: Do you want the earlier cap:end + +queatica read took to you? TRH 11111F-SS: Yes, the earlier coopound q2eation read back. KR. LINK: Read it bock. Row about it? Objection suatained. rrnereupon, the following was rood by the Court Reporter: 'Question: All right. Will you turn to pa? 13, please. When pita were identifying articles which there we reference wade to Kr. Rothstein. illegal activities end Mr. 1111111' involvement contribution to or knowledge about those I) activities, did it natter to you where that le information care frost? IS \*And here is Mat T mean. Did you exclude. is for example, press statements by Sr. Soarola79 12 A. Yes to the first question. Yes, it did matter is where it cart from. SO BY MR. L:M<: 20 O. Okay. Mrplain to me why and what you did to II narrow the field. It A. For example, I ignored several -- there's a 23 lot or 63CUT4ftta court documents about this case that 24 are available on-line. I didn't link those bells. Y, 25 know, I lust hit -- 1 -- + +2 You did not? Specifically court documents, no, 1 did rot 3 include those. 4 Q. They're identified in your report, the court s documents. 6 A. Where are they identified? O. Okay. Mt will look at that. So you excluded court documents? Yes. Now, if -- the only disclose -- just to !, clarify that, if an article referenced a court document or had a snippet from s Court document, you know, like ,2 free a news article, time I included it. But if it was " just. you knee, about Sc- Florida Court Association repialdtOry, no, I didn't include those. :s O. All right. Any other limitations? :6 A. They -- if, for example, there were articles :2 that just mentioned the case -- Q. Oh-huh. :) A. -- but didn't mention that -- had the statements about Mr. being involved in those 2: illegal activities. I didn't include those. '2 There may have been some other examples. But 23 my real -- my real aspect was to focus on some type of explicit publishing of those statements. :1 All right. And so I take it then that you + +statements or articles or interviews were Created by Mr. or Mr. Scarela, thole are Still included in the nutter of it you identified with statements:7n BY Wt. LIMO: Q. Okay. Let re ask the question again. 7 think we missed a couple of words. Let to see if : can break s it down. So let's take it then -- for oxargele, the It first article listed on page 13. Do you see that that'- 11 an October 4th, 2017 article? 12 A. Well, 7 net want to -- that' -- this 1: 22 search result, • snippet linked to cle. 24 O. Bight. And I asm t a cle that': 1S referenced here is one that you uded as a hit in 16 looking for a statement 're showing it. I? A. Moll, no, in pure 1 1 just give - le trying to explai n area of search quer:e. 19 2 would have to particular link, if I 20 int rot link in my report. 21 is -- okay. we all you're doing in 22 caste I read it wrong, is it says: This is Figure 1, I think; right? That is cornett. + +I were not eliminating articles that, for e . If 2 Mr. Scarola or Mr. woke to a 1 1 to en article being written or t vl rter 2 tO • hearing or had lunch with talk about s the Case, which created an Mr cis. Yep dn't exclude 6 those from your analysis? ?irl MR. SCAROLA: amen. Objection, no predicate, and compound. 15 20 21 2 2 2) 24 75 answer it. the 104 documents I looked for the he statement that linked Mr. to activities. So that if -- so that if some of the or articles or interviews were created by Mr. or Mr. Sterols, those are still included In the number of hems you identified with statements? MR. SCAROLA: Objection, no proper predicate, assumes facto not in evidence, no good faith basis to suggest such things ever happened. A. Can I have the question back? MR. LIMB: Please. iThereupon, the following was read by the Cart Reporter: 'Question: So that if some of the + +• Q. Google search results for search: epstein Pone. scheme. Right? A. Yea. 0. 1== So these are the item that popped on that search, and then you would read the article to see what it said? 6 A. Yea, these are the first -- well, these are the first five articles from that particular query. And then I'd open into the article end then reed whet the article said. O. Okay. And were TOO Provided any parameters 2 ) I:Velar. Schroth Or Mr. for tea tint flame 24 you should \*mirth for? is A. From then specifically I was not Provided with 24 a time frame. 17 O. Okay. Did they ask you to limit your mare\* le to the tire period that Mr. Bpetein's Cagle/et again, ' 19 Mr. Rothstein and Mr. was pending? 20 Not explicitly, no. 21 0. Okay. Did you limit your search to that yr- :2 period? 22 A. Yes. 24 Q. Al: right. So that your search should not 2S contain any articles that go pest 2012? + +1 A. That is incorrect. + +2 Q. All right. So then you did search for +3 articles that came into existence after Mr. Epstein's +4 Complaint against Mr. Rothstein and Mr. [REDACTED] was +5 dismissed? + +6 A. Let me -- let me go back. I misunderstood +7 your question. + +8 Q. Uh-huh. + +9 A. All right. I -- the lawyer talk of "claims," +10 "counterclaims," is throwing me a little bit. I did it +11 from the original lawsuit from Mr. Epstein against +12 Mr. Rothstein and Mr. [REDACTED] and one other person. +13 + +14 Q. Uh-huh. + +15 A. So, yeah, that's what -- when you said the +16 "lawsuit" that's what I was -- + +17 Q. So you started your search December 7th, 2009. +18 That's when the lawsuit -- + +19 A. Correct. + +20 Q. -- was filed. And when did you end your +21 search to look for articles that would have been related +22 to that lawsuit? + +23 A. The -- well, I stopped searching in around 17, +24 18, October. So I included every article that I ran +25 into. + +26 Q. And were you aware when you did your search + +1 that the December 7th, 2009 lawsuit was dismissed in +2 2012? + +3 A. I don't know exactly what you mean by +4 "dismissed." But in articles I've read, I read the +5 lawsuit was no longer pending. + +6 Q. And that -- was that information that the +7 lawsuit was no longer pending in 2012 important to the +8 gathering of the articles that contained information +9 about Mr. Edwards and Mr. Rothstein? + +10 A. Mr. -- for what I had to do, no. + +11 Q. Okay. Do you know the time period that +12 Mr. Edwards filed his counterclaim against Mr. Epstein, +13 when that happened? + +14 A. Except for here, no, I do not. + +15 Q. Did it influence any of the research that you +16 did that Mr. [REDACTED] filed a public counterclaim lawsuit +17 against Mr. Epstein within 30 days of December 9th, +18 2009? + +19 A. I -- again, all the lawsuit stuff I don't +20 know. + +21 Q. All right. Did you find any articles between +22 December 7th and when Mr. [REDACTED] and his lawyer, +23 Mr. Scarola, filed their counterclaim lawsuit against +24 Mr. Epstein? + +25 A. I have no idea what that means. + +1 Q. Okay. You have an appendix to Exhibit 2, +2 which is your written report in this case, that +3 identifies -- + +4 MR. SCAROLA: Did you mean to give me this +5 copy? + +6 MR. LINK: I meant to. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: [REDACTED], okay. + +8 MR. LINK: I meant to. And the reason I did +9 is all of these articles are going to correspond to +10 the actual article itself, Jack, so we can tie them +11 in together. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Got it. Thank you. + +13 MR. LINK: Let's go ahead and park this +14 Exhibit 3. + +15 (Thereupon, the document referred to was +16 marked Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 3 for identification.) +17 BY MR. LINK: + +18 Q. All right. We're looking at Exhibit 3, which +19 is the appendix to the written report you prepared in +20 this case, is that right? + +21 A. Yes. + +22 Q. And under Reports and Articles Referenced, +23 these are the reports and articles that you found +24 contained the statement about Mr. [REDACTED] and +25 Mr. Rothstein and illegal activities; is that right? + +1 A. Well, no, not exactly. + +2 Q. How do I have it wrong? + +3 A. These reports and articles are articles that I +4 referenced in my report as footnotes and things like +5 that to support the textual things I'm writing. + +6 Q. Well, were there additional articles that you +7 did not list in your report that you reviewed that +8 contain the statement that you were searching for? + +9 A. Yes, there were. + +10 Q. Okay. So I thought I heard you say that there +11 were approximately 108 articles you reviewed. On here +12 it lists 121. Which of the 108 articles that you +13 reviewed that contain the statement have you not +14 identified in your appendix, sir? + +15 A. Well, one correction. It's 104. + +16 Q. 104. Thank you. + +17 A. And I do include the 104 articles. + +18 Q. So then when I asked if every article that +19 included the statement about Mr. Rothstein and +20 Mr. [REDACTED] and illegal activity that is part of your +21 calculation, if it was included in the appendix, the +22 answer is yes? + +23 A. Well, that's not the question you asked me. +24 If you're asking me if all of those articles are listed +25 here in Appendix C, then the answer is yes. + +1 Q. Okay. Great. So let's start with item number + 2 2, which is -- + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Could I make a suggestion? + +4 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: Because I think maybe you're a + 6 little bit confused and it might be helpful if we + 7 clarify something. + +8 MR. LINK: Please. + +9 MR. SCAROLA: There's a separate appendix that + 10 appears at page 87. You are referencing an + 11 appendix at page 79. + +12 MR. LINK: Yesh. + +13 MR. SCAROLA: It's the list that begins at + 14 page 87, which is specifically labeled Links to + 15 Articles Containing the Defaming Statements. + +16 Do you see that? + +17 MR. LINK: Yesh, but those are not the + 18 articles. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: If you're going -- + +20 MR. LINK: Those are just links to them. You + 21 can't actually get the article from doing that. We + 22 tried. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Well, okay, I'm just suggesting + 24 to you that maybe -- + +25 MR. LINK: I understand. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: No. + +2 MR. LINK: Let's go ahead and mark this as + 3 Exhibit 4, please. + +4 (Thereupon, the document referred to was + 5 marked Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 4 for identification.) + +6 THE WITNESS: Can I stand up and get my water? + +7 MR. LINK: Absolutely. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: Want to take a short break? + +9 We've been going for about an hour. + +10 THE WITNESS: Yesh, that would be good. + +11 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 9:59. Going + 12 off the record. + +13 (Thereupon, at 9:59 a.m. I receipt was taken + 14 until 10:04 a.m., after which the deposition continued + 15 as follows:) + +16 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:04. We are + 17 back on the record. + +18 BY MR. LINK: + +19 Q. All right. So Jansen Exhibit 4, which + 20 correlates to number 2, is this an article that contains + 21 a statement in it that you then looked to see how many + 22 touches or how many people logged on to read it? + +23 A. I don't know. I can check it, if you want. + +24 Q. Would you please? + +25 A. I don't see a statement. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: -- maybe you want to clarify the + 2 relationship between Appendix C and Appendix D. + 3 You might be -- you might be better able to focus + 4 on where you want to go if you do that. + +5 MR. LINK: I think I'm okay. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. + +7 MR. LINK: This is the only way we can get the + 8 articles up because they were not attached. + +9 THE WITNESS: I provided all the articles. + +10 MR. LINK: Right. Some of them -- actually, + 11 some I got, some were not there. + +12 THE WITNESS: No, I provided hard copies -- + 13 electronic copies of every single one. + +14 MR. LINK: To? + +15 THE WITNESS: Someone from your law firm who + 16 contacted me. + +17 MR. LINK: Okay. Well, we printed them. It + 18 doesn't really matter. I think we have them. So + 19 we will go through them. + +20 And we're looking at number -- + +21 What are we on, 4? + +22 THE COURT REPORTER: Uh-huh. + +23 MR. LINK: Which should have a number + 24 corresponding to number 2 on here. + +25 Jack, did I give you an article? + +1 Q. Okay. So this would not be an article then + 2 that would be included in your numbers? + +3 A. If it doesn't contain the statement no, it + 4 would not be included in the number. + +5 Q. Could you explain to me why it's commented + 6 upon in your written report if it doesn't contain the + 7 statement? + +8 A. Again, back to this section here. These are + 9 reports and articles that were actually referenced in my + 10 report as citations for some statements. This is not + 11 the list of articles that contain the defaming + 12 statements. + +13 Q. I understand that, but you told me all 104 of + 14 them are listed in this section of the appendix. + +15 A. No, I did not. It's in Web Page Printouts + 16 section of this appendix. + +17 Q. So if I turn in your report to page -- + +18 MR. LINK: Mr. Scarola is going to help me. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: 87. + +20 BY MR. LINK: + +21 Q. -- 87, that's the list of articles, is that + 22 right? + +23 A. It's actually in two places. I have it in + 24 that appendix with a nice list of each of the articles + 25 and the domains. And then I also have it in Appendix C + +4 Web Page Printouts. Okay. So if I go to web Page Printouts those are the articles? + +:3 A. Okay. + +:2 A. Yes, sir. + +:4 O. I don't have IS here but 1 have 19. So let's take s look ett that. + +:4 MR. LAIN: Lot's go ahead and mark this as Exhibit 5. + +:1 :e (Thereupon, the document referred to was marked Plaintiff.\* Exhibit Member 5 for identification.) + +here in Web Page Printouts, which is a different section of this appendix. + +A. Yell. sir. + +Q. Okay. Good. That helped. All right. So I'm on the right appendix, wrong Place. + +So it starts with what 1 have lumbered as 10. + +0. Rory helpful. Thank you. + +:) BY NR. LIMO: + +27 MR. SCAROLA: Are you testifying? + +23 21 MR. LINK: No. I'm making sure that - not. I'm making sure that yOt1 understand what we're looking at. + +0. Okay. So Exhibit 5 correlates on page SO to the handwritten number 19. + +I : grabbed the screenshoto for oath of these articles n , i 2 provide the link In the report and an actual screens).— • of the article in the collection of documents in ny + +• report that was provided to, I guess, both attorneys. KR. LINK: All right. Okay. Lot's nark th:2 • as the next exhibit, Exhibit 6. + +7 fOnereuPeo, the document referred to was a marked Plaintiff's Exhibit limber 6 for identification.) + +• By MR. LINK: + +le Q. This Exhibit 6 -- I'll do It a different way. II now. :his Exhibit 6, does that correlate to the + +It htLICST2tten number it co page SO or Exh. it 3? + +IS A. 100:1. the In is not he title is the same. So, I mean -- yeah, the IS URL is not here, so I can't say sure it's the 'mac' la are article but the t + +17 O. Okay. Aroma t 1 article that you my.' la have reviewed? + +IS A. : can't all 16.0 articles. nut, 1,2 20 I said, -a not here, to I can't really say foe 21 sure, le to the awe. + +22 see this -- . SCA:IOLA: Let to also point out that whet + +\ 2 . have narked as Exhibit Harbor 6 clearly is only • portion of this article. + +MR. SCAROLA: Because that didn' red like's question. + +MR. SCAROLA: It's not. is sure that the record is -- + +A. I don't think I've San thiS [Ore. this particular printout. + +, BY NR. 1.111X: + +a You haven't a6nf tB19 article? + +No + +A n't all seeing it. + +So then if you haven't seen it, then it ) won been referenced in the data that you + +Well, this article. I mean -- I) + +Q. Okay. :t + +A. -- this link is 19 so -- + +Q. Okay. And then you don't believe that this article that is marked as Exhibit 5 is the article to ;\* that link? :4 + +21 I can almost tell you it's not. + +22 Q. All right. + +•I A. I can explain that, if you'd like. + +24 O. Sure. Go ahead. + +'I A. Yeah, this PreasReader is -- I Included all -- KR. LINK: I understand that. i'n just + +trying to make rare we've got the right article:. + +KR. &CAROLS: Okay. Well, you don't have t'o right article if all you've racked is a piece of the article. Ae know that that's the case. + +Correct? + +MR. L1NX: I'm not asking hire to covenant on + +the article. Just If I've got the right + +• BY MR. LINK: + +Q. l\* this the -- forget what al: of the + +II irtfOtInetiCa contained in the article. Is this the 12 article. title and author that Is -- ties into I) handwritten number IS. If you Can tell? + +It Yeah, to be really honest with you, I can't 41 tell beCaall the UAL is not here. You know, the title IS is the same. + +1? MR. LINX: All right. + +le Lot's aark this as Exhibit 7. 20 flhemelcon, the docurent referred to was 20 parked Plaintiff's Exhibit Nester 1 for identification.) + +22 By KR. LINK: + +Q. Exhibit 7 is an article from the New York + +23 Post, October 5th, 2017. Does that Vie -- is this the 24 article, if you look at the top, pressreader.con, that 25 ties into handwritten =bet 19? + +A. Yes, the URL is the same. This looks like one of my screenshots. So T believe this ties Into number ) 19 that you've annotated on this appendix. + +4 Q. Okay. So is this one of the articles that you I located that contained the statement you were searching for? + +I recall -- I recall this particular article, so yea. + +All right. And what is the statement in here '0 that you found to fit the description of what you were • looking for? + +• A. If I recall this correctly. T believe it was ') paragraph 6 that -- I, 2, 3 -- excuse ms, paragraph 5 is ,4 why I included this. + +0. Okay. Anything \*leo in hero A. The article included at least One statement. ') I mean, I can road the entire article but looks like :s paragraph 5 there mot my criteria. + +O. Okay. And you say that this article came Out 23 In October of this year, just a couple of months ago? 21 A. Yea. I see that. + +Q. All right. And do you know whore the 23 information for this article came from? :4 Tho New York post. + +No, I understand that. I mean for Its + +Eustschewich, the author of the article. + +I didn't investigate where t r Or the source or where t nflRatiOr came from or who she spoke with? + +A. No, T did not. + +O. Do you know whether t • any quotes in ' any of the articles y viewed that were made by 4 Mr. Epstein? + +NE: + +Did Mr. Epstein give any quotes in any of the ,1 articles that you researched? + +r Nell, I wasn't looking for that, so T :e really -- I don't know. + +) Q. Did Mr. Epstein's lawyers give any quotes in 10 any of the articles that you researched? + +I can't say for sure but there seem to be + +12 plenty of lawyer quotes so -- + +,) O. I agree there are lots of lawyer quotes. I'm asking if Mr. Epstein's lawyers, not Mr. IIIIIII' + +2/ lawyers, Mr. Epstein's lawyers were ever quoted end the + +Mr. statements In the Complaint? + +A: rate and apart from + +I information they were quoted on included one of the 2 statements you were looking for? + +• A. I can't -- I wasn't specifically looking rct 4 that. I can't recall. + +S O. Okay. So who made the statement was not e Important to you, simply that the statement existed? + +? That it occurred within the article: correct: + +s And since this one was In 2017, that's about + +• rive years aster Mr. Epstein's lawsuit against to Mr. Rothstein -- against Mr. Edward was dismissed: Si right? + +12 A. : don't know. + +13 Q. Nell, you know that 201? 1e than 2012? + +IS A. Yes. I can do the + +It O. Okay. tint\* that you + +17 found from -- Inn t 1 roc a timing le standpoint. Eta ie the dote of the first article t"u'. + +19 you found that of the statements yell we, 20 lookirg + +:I recall. + +2e re something you can look at that . \ K. 2 t 40 t date of the first article that ow... , • AS1 ts the statement that Mt. Sterols and Mr. as S you to find? + +You. I'm asking about the article. + +I'm lust asking to clarify the + +Nell, if we had all the electronic copies or the articles we could look at the dates that they worn published. + +Do you have something with you that you can look at? + +: don't have -- 1 provided -- I provided those + +particular documents, eo I don't have then with re. You didn't keep a copy or to your ce-puter + +anything? + +A. II, yes, I hove it. 11 0. Yeu have it? + +have the docurents. 13 0. Okay. SO is there a way of looking at this 14 appendix or the report to determine the very first tin, IS and Mid, article you were able be locate One of the + +IS statements you were searching tar? + +r? Not by looking at the report, no. + +le Nan you go through -- when I'm looking at It this report : see dates on here, a lot of 2017s. 2015. 10 Can you identify one of these that has a 2009 + +21 paelicatton date? + +A. : mean, I can look through each of these ,C4 + +23 °Rio, if you want re to. + +21 A. : don't know. + +By taking a look at your appendix can you make that determination? + +A. Well, let me look at the URLs. + +O. Okay. + +A. Now, just -- you know, a lot of these Inas + +1 4 5 O. Okay. So What la it in paragraph -- T'n going to put. a bracket -- weld you put a bracket around the two paragraph, for me, please? Or jest identify them with a star, however you want to, so we knew Which 40,04.0 4 don't have dates. e we're looking at. + +And then: marked at..." + +O. i understand. In looking at what's available + +to you today can you find one of these that existed in + +1 2009? ICI + +A. Well, let me leek. + +MP. SGABOLA: nave you done the search of dates? Bet4Iuse if you've done it and you tell us 11 that it'40 not there for 2009, I'm willing to stipulate to that. + +15 WI BR. LINK: + +• 0. Go ahead. You can keep going. + +A. Mo. Based on the UAL. -- looking at the URLa T cannot come to an article from 2009, if T recall the O question correctly. IS A. That is + +16 Okay. 115e first paragraph, what Is It In that statement or In that paragraph contains the !Leant that you were eearching for? + +12 12 I) 14 A. well, "...alleging the attorney was involved in false claims rode by Penni schemer t Rothstein.- And then explains the it tivitica. And then on the next d drib i ddreemes + +IS as being the attorney -- + +16 Okay. + +17 16 A. -- that t eua roguish referenced. 0. And th was a 0 article, April 22nd, 2011? + +(Witness emcialled.1 + +)0 O. Okay. And in looking at the mats can you tell 72 what paper was this article written? it me how many of these articles were in existence before 2I the latio the Palm teach Omilly HOW,. 12 2012 when the lawsuit against Mr. was dismissed? 72 familiar with that newspaper? + +> k r + +23 A. Well, I could go through and look at then 734441 Pm not. 14 again but it's probably just very similar. And to kind A/1.04 Do you knew what its subscription is, the 2\$ of outline, in my reports, you know, there are certain Iritter? + +e t + +documents that are no longer available. Yeah, looking at thee\* BBL\*, + +All right. Thank you. + +iTheroupon, a downs + +Exhibit Number 8 for identlfi %len.) + +6 BY MR. LINK: + +3 Yea. On page I?, number 62, Palm Beach Daily 4 News, daily traffic 1,220. + +I can look at my report. + +Okay. littera in your report dace it say that.' + +5 O. Okay. I'm sorry. I was distracted. Can yo:: + +6 do that one core time for re? 1 apologize. + +' O. Exhibit 8 1 eve ties into handwritten 7 A. Yea, sir. Page I7. + +3 nunbem 20. e 0. Page 17? f Con take look and see if T have that 9 A. And there's a table at the top. O right? m 0. Uh-hvh. + +it art Ink I'm about 1 for 10. Hoyt\* 2 II A. And item 'weber 62. + +12 fo 1 m definitely not making the III', of FaXe. 1, 0. Yeah. + +l\$ IBM is cut off but this looks like what 27 A. The Palm Beach Deily News. Ts that the se annotated here as number 20. 14 correct? And than 0,320. + +i5 All right. And this is an article that you If All right. CtlikatralWerCIMAD + +14 have Included as one of the articles that contains the CO Siftlic3NICIUTCI T7: 72,7d7r011.2) I7 statement about Mr. you were searching fort dB 23, ft laaleirlinnt0110 se correct? 00 WittreC411MC + +ts A. Yes. 19 O. On that day? O O. Can you show me where the statement is that 70 A. WEITrZtr=11=flitOILNYZOPOtIlrhele + +1I caused you to select this document? 20 rilMtS779 0:311TengliMMCA3 + +/2 A. Paragraphs 7 and 8. 2a pcm4=X:PalitMIOCIceething-J1k4ILBACI ClUCIWItallyflj + +O 0. Paragraph 7 that 'starts with the words: 2.3 (thdyttreCzayegrait'StItelredttitilniC3SIta + +14 worked at..." 24 Q. Over what ;cried of time did you consider? So + +1 A. Uh-huh. + +2 Q. What time frame did you consider in +3 determining 8,320 people reviewed this article? + +4 A. The -- I went to SimilarWeb, went to the +5 appropriate time period and then got the daily unique +6 traffic. + +7 Q. And so for that time period there was an +8 average daily traffic for the paper or for this article? + +9 A. As I explained in the report, for the paper. + +10 Q. For the paper? + +11 A. (THEWEBSITE) + +12 Q. SO HOW MANY PEOPLE ON APRIL 22ND, 2011 READ +13 THIS ARTICLE? + +14 A. (THAT'S WHAT THIS NUMBER PROVIDED) (THEWEBSITE) +15 (READ THIS NUMBER STATED HOW TYPICALLY AVAILABLE FOR THE +16 INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES) + +17 Q. Okay. Can you tell me of the 8,320 people +18 that looked at The Shiny Sheet during some period of +19 time in April 2011 how many actually read this article? + +20 A. The -- let me kind of go back. I thought you +21 were referring to the palmbeachdailynews.com, not this +22 Shiny Sheet. + +23 But this particular -- these numbers are used +24 for the particular readership. So it would be -- a way +25 of looking at it would be this would be a max but a + +1 calculation, so I did the average. + +2 Q. All right. So you came up with doing the math +3 8,320? + +4 A. Correct. + +5 Q. And that's the approximate number of people +6 that logged into the on-line site? + +7 A. Or visited that particular site. + +8 Q. Or visited that particular site. + +9 But it's hitting the site, not this article? + +10 A. That is correct. + +11 Q. All right. So you can't tell me how many of +12 the folks that logged on to the Palm Beach Daily News on +13 April 22nd, 2011 actually even [REDACTED] the article about +14 Mr. Epstein and Mr. [REDACTED]? + +15 A. I did find out exact readership is difficult +16 to nearly impossible, especially when it comes to +17 on-line newspapers and things like that, because the way +18 people read. + +19 Q. I understand that. So isn't my statement +20 true, you can't tell me how many people on that day +21 actually read this article? + +22 A. No, that's not exactly true. What -- I think +23 the way to look at this number is this is an +24 approximation -- a good approximation of the readership, +25 and it specifically addresses my particular assignment, + +1 conservative number on the number of readerships. + +2 Q. Okay. Let's try this again. As I understand, +3 there were 8,320 people approximately because you did an +4 average based on some period of time; right? + +5 A. Well, it's not I did an average. That's +6 typically how it's done if you're looking for a +7 particular period, you know, there. (BECAUSE APPROXIMALLY +8 GOING BACK THIS FALL, YOU KNOW IT IS TYPICALLY AVAILABLE) +9 (FOR A MONTH OF THE GIVEN PERIOD) So these traffic +10 services, they do the averaging many times. + +11 Q. Oh, so the 8,320 was provided to you by a +12 service? + +13 A. Well, yes, I use -- it's one of the traffic +14 services I use. + +15 Q. And so the date -- the inquestion is making it do +16 did you take a month of the formation, and then taking +17 assume there were 30 days in it, and total that up and +18 then divided by 30? + +19 Q. (Cash) +20 Q. (To get an average) +21 Q. (That would be a way daily traffic) +22 (Sales stated) + +23 Q. But did you do that or did you pull it from a +24 service is what I'm asking you? + +25 A. I believe SimilarWeb gives a monthly + +1 which was to major a dissemination of these particular +2 statements. + +3 Q. Well, as a part of your assignment, as I +4 understand it, the number you came up with would be the +5 number of individuals who this information was +6 disseminated to. + +7 A. That is correct. + +8 Q. Which means they had to read it; right? + +9 If it's going to impact me and I'm going to +10 form an opinion about Mr. [REDACTED] based on that read, if +11 I don't read it, then it hasn't impact my view of him. +12 Do you agree with that? + +13 A. It depends what you mean by "read." + +14 Q. Well, if I don't read this article, I don't +15 see the statement; do I? + +16 A. Well, if you -- you know, I get many e-mails +17 from different newspapers and I go to different +18 newspaper sites and a lot of times there will be mini +19 stories on the pages and I'll read the headline and the +20 snippet from the particular paragraph and then read some +21 stories. + +22 And so -- but you're asking a question that I +23 was not asked to actually investigate, the exact +24 readership of these particular articles. I was asked +25 the dissemination of these particular statements. And + +2 that was my 9,669,342. But you're not telling us that number or people actually read any one of these statements) are a you? 4 A. The exact readership, no. Okay. And you can't tell me as you sit hers today how many people actually read this article. 4 Exhibit 8. dated April 22nd, 20114 can you? A. I Could say it's -- you know, the muter that ,0 were disseminated to was 8.320. Bet, no, I can't say '' the exact readership of that particular article. a O. Okay. And you can't tell me the erect a readership of any of the articles that you 10Cated; Can you? :s A. I'm going topeben IOW role as am expert. I mean, this Is not like counting loose change in your " pocket. I mean, it's -- there's multiple -- there's traffic rankers. And so these -- then particular traffic number\* are what's used in the industry for ,0 readership in audits. 2: O. So let me try my gention ono sore time. 22 Sir, you can't tell se the actual number of 2) people that road any one of then articles that you have 24 identified, can you, sir? 24 A. Although., am i tried to explain, but on the AS" + +technical aspects of it but, no, the exec [ship. no. next to It 0 Take a look at this it. =Rota: Sahib! TEE COURT REPORTER) it. Lila: Yee, air. iTheroupOn marked Plaintiff's E h BY It. UNE: O. A' 9 T be docunont referred to was r 9 for Identification.' if 1 have done this right. Exhibit • to item handwritten number 21. Let me chock. it looks 111m this is that particular . All right. Can you please tell me the number of hits on October 20, 2013 to the Pals Beach Daily Ikms on-line paper for that day? A. Well, there was -- we just looked at that. It was 8.320. And you told no that was for a month period of tine in 2011. This is two years later. So I'm - 2 asking -- you're not telling us that two years later the erect sane number of people were touching the website; are you? 2, A. The -- in my report if an article -- multiple + +' articles were [rem the sere mbeite, I just Included one traffic amber. O. Okay. Se wee it your memption that the 4 exact nee 'weber or people that looted at the Peril 22nd, 2011 article looked at the October 20th, 2013 article? A. It Meld have been sore. it Could have beet less. it could vary day by my a little bit. 5 O. Only a little bit over a two-year period of 20 tine? A. : did not look -- we could look at a 12 part:agar site but if you look at -- I can loot 4" D S mean, this particular r Moaned la seven different articles cm re con the 15 deicing statements. only one and so used r • 14 unien physical period. O. Okay. So the tem 'deleting le atatevents• nal cause that's what you were 19 told by Mr. Sean, d . 20 A. ng that as a way to look at it as naybe II sae r the statements that were set forth in 22 \s 1 re 0. trent,. without giving they any color. is t'a' So molly what you were leaking for right, or ChereCteritationt + +A. The statements that dissociated kr. with illegal activities. That's what i'n look-' O. So I'm lust trying to figure out the 2 thoroughness of what you did. A. Sure. O. So 1 understand that in 2011 you looked at o ' math of log-a, activity and then divided that number by 4 30 to came up with S.000-sme-odd nutter that we looked 9 at, right? 10 A. Well, I calculated the unique daily netters. Ii Again. this particular webeite that you're painting out 12 published seven different article\*. 0 0. Yes. sir, but not -- I apelegite. I net be la doing a lousy lob Of asking questions and Camonicati, IS today. I thought we had really Meowed this home. la which was that in 2011 you personally went to a env', 1? and got 30 days or hits co the Pala Beach Shiny Sheet le western -- 20 Yeah. PO ad then did the math? That's correct. 22 You didn't do that in 2013E 23 Let re -- let re -- r see where you're getttro 24 at now. 21 So, yes. Yeah, for the particular motes t.,' + +I published multiple articles, yeah, I can't remember the . But 1 can look -- 2 exact particular date f used in this one. They had e Q. So in doing your search if you found a 1 seven different articles published on these statements. ' statement then you would stop reading the article; is I so I ignored six of them and just used one occurrence. 4 that correct? + +\$ Q. Okay. So you ignored them. 1 got it. A. I didn't say that. 1 just said I would + +t Let's take a look at Cxhibit 9. include it if it contained the statement. + +I Can you clarify that statement? I do'.'.. Q. Did you read the entire article once you + +\$ understand by 'I ignored them.' I identified a statement? + +. You don't understand what? \$ A. Sometimes 1 did. Sometimes I did not. + +.0 A. Your statement. 10 Q. Okay. There you go, sir. + +et Q. Which statement, sir? II 'Thereupon, the document referred to was + +.2 A. The statement that said 1 ignored them. And I 12 marked Plaintiff's exhibit Number 10 + +'3 want to make sure that you understood my response 12 identifiCation./ + +'. correctly. 1\$ BY MR. LYNX: + +ts Q. I think you used the word 'ignored.' That's is Q. tot's look at 4hib 0. please, and I + +'I what you said, you ignored -- you looked at One and :s believe this ties in r en item 23. t1 ignored six. That's what you mid. re Yea. + +tee Okay. to Okay. SO you .55e this as an August 2012 + +:) MR. SCAROLA: The record will reflect Mat the .9 article -- + +20 testimony was. 20 A. + +21 TUE )(MESS: Yeah. + +,2 BY NR. LINK: + +2) Q. That's what you said. + +259SIII" + +And this article announces that Mr. Epstein + +24 A. So let me -- 4 S a his suit against Mr. -r correct? + +You don't like that choice of words by A. Says: "Billionaire sex offender drops..." + +yourself? + +2 A. If you're focusing On that ti - + +) well, you know what. you're right, I + +• ignore -- I did ignore six art + +0. That's what you sal + +A. Yeah. + +Q. Okay. SO n tre look at this article. + +A. Sure. + +Nem Exhibit 9 did you identify + +:2 that met t tors of your \*\*arch? + +A li it would be paragraph 9. + +ill you ague • star by the paragraph? + +e. neas complied./ + +Cme, two, three, four, five -- the one that + +:5 st with "Among..." + +t A. Yes. + +Q. Okay. My other statements in here? + +MR. IcsemA: Could we reed that into the :\$ + +!) record? Sorry. + +20 MR. LINK: That's an exhibit in the record + +already. I don't think we need to read it. + +BY HR. SCARCRA: + +Q. Were there any other statements in here? + +A. sell, I can read the rest of the article but + +21 t was in the Palm Beach Post? + +22 + +"Billionaire sex offender drops mutt against + +Scott Rothstein and one of his partners." Yes. + +Q. Okay. Can you tell ne in this article that + +announces that Mr. is no longer a defendant + +the lawsuit brought by Mr. Epstein what is the phrase + +that you isolated or located to fit your search? + +A. Let me read the article. + +Q. Uh-huh. + +A. Yes. That would be the ombination of the + +first three perogroPM. + +O. Okay. And tern to page 2, if you will, of the + +I2 article. This is in October -- I'm sorry, August 2012; + +.7 Correct? + +le Yes, August 2012. + +IS All right. Aid d0 you See M. Scatela gym, + +es in this article? + +I? A. Yes. + +le 0. And do you sou where Kr. SC•rols says: + +I0 "Despite three years of trying, Ppatetn never produced + +25 any evidence to shore up his allegations, said attorney + +23 Jack Scarola." + +3,2 Yea, I see that. + +22 Okay. And you me Kr. Scarola in the next + +24 paragraph Is µnoted as well that: 'An..." neaning + +11 I2 I) Is :4 I, Is I, It 12 13 )4 15 that's a word only Mr. Scarola could get out of his myth in an articulate way -- ...claims for the purees, of trying to extort Mr. into abandoning the lawsuits on behalf of Mr. Epstein's young attorney (sic'?" Do you an that? A. II, Mr. Epstein's young victine. Young victims. Thank you. Yea. I see that. MR. SCARDLA: So that the record is clear, the first paragraph attributes a statement to me but it's not a quote. Agreed? MR. LINK: Yes, sir. NR. \$CAROLA: Rut the Wend paragraph le a quote. S. LIXX: I agree. the second one la a quote. S. SChROLA: Although I would acknowledge the statement attributed to me is at least an accurate \*unitary of what I said. MR. LINN: Sounds like scanning you would MR. SCAROLA: it does. MR. LIMIT I agree. BY KR. LYNX: Did you take into consideration when you we, + +lot. LINK: I'll take that. MR. SCAROLh: I knew you would. kn. LINX: that was really good. Did you write (Sewn the next question? ?hat was excellent. net was excellent. TM WilletSS: You two have a relationship here. Kn. LINK: For 30 years. See days good; am, • days bad. Depends on how we're doing. so TEC KTINESS: Yeah, that's a long 11 relationship. it halt. SCUOLA: It's sore a t by meant. 1) KR. LINK: I think it is t by moment, la but always very such in of U gentleman. IS MS WITNESS: That's that's the way It 16 should be. 1? BY Km. LINN: 16 So let try again. Is MN. LI Did write that down? LA: No, I didn't, but it's on the tl el k t follow that. Okay. I jest looked if the article contained the + +I looking at article, after August 2012 the 2 Mr. Stare]a had publicly denounced bitie HT I done end said to the world that Mr • Clearer any taint or allegati • Mr. Cpatein brought? 3 ti S. SCAROLA: I'm go question as cos A. I was going rain point t BY KR. L thee r had ree and that act to the kind of lost me on the it again. re are two statements in here that are I) att Mr. Scarola and one direct quote. Co you h that? is Yea, I agree. Q. And Mr. Scarola is making it clear that what Mr. Epstein filed against Mr. had absolutely no ri basis; true? A. Yes, that seems to be the point taken. Q. And did you take into consideration when doing your Internet research that on August 17th, 2012 there 2, was a public statement by Kr. lawyer that he 11 had essentially been -- 14 VAPIWID agasiatoircnatiouomo QS + +statements that i was looking for and whether whatever • Onion, in the article. 0. Qkil g3SA941cdCE3ren cDdO • 0.10s InhOnti ranitOTOCOWnheadetaliP20 O41, PI, aCZ 01l1120 40:1400157.WthOritOhithOhat) O ttikln340HCLC 11444.74413CMC=E044141ChYDDY9DCIDO • nart..lihrj)c.thCifkatigsp s g7 \$4-3 12 Cf3 tIMIZIOCILIZanYr crolmatchocoNo • OrgraCt:PI:kNeD1Md(rahip:Irafrnminrjrappipmcomag\* CID MC::Edwarde:WaS:diffeMIAC:AfteC140OarOIX:madaMple OM litltements:pl:201tthaphC'pl'43ZZ IS 017 raj I) Ca plerayouvitayoug:,esearch:OICYco:,4telyilmie qB iany:readetCbati3clballMeaeneettbe=anatImahal) 42 iyOU:SitecalOcOCreierS3/ 4.3 am Pell ig Q. Can you quantify the total number of people ni that have reed any one singular article about n Hr• lust one article out of all of the c!--- 22 that you have identified? 23 to Ts A. I don't understand quantify. Yeah, yOu found 104 articles -- A. Correct. + +O. Ea:kightp catCYCSOYICAtilY220Cgralldraba0 + +o petgally:yead:pne:pt:Ehe:IkEDSIUltleAll + +ft CIOC.E000 2•11007:Seld3 + +4 Q. Okay. + +7 A. Well, beyond me. + +6 Q. Well, you read them es part of your + +P assignment. + +A. That's correct. + +▪ **Q. Row many hours did it take you to locate all of the articles?** + +**tl** A. I can ballpark it. + +**12** O. That's fair. + +13 A. 17.25. + +14 O. That's a ballpark? + +Is 16 A. Yea. Wavle there's also Woe Other stuff going On there. + +Ie MR. SCAROLA: Bey a scientist at bellperking. + +Q. Re's better than you. + +O By MR. LINK: + +)3 Q. 17.2S? You can't get it a little tighter than )1 that? That's as good as it gets? + +12 I had to eliminate sone times that I wasn't + +)2 actually looting for articles. + +14 Q. 17.25. And how many hours In total have you ,2 spent in developing your opinion that you're providing + +I today? + +A to developing the Opinion? + +O. Op through today. I ass + +• 0. -- you can't talk a + +6 A. Yeah. I said I bill . And then, you + +n knOW, 7 did -- read r•-read my report and stuff I for deposition. so it three or four sore hours. + +Q. 20 + +thing like that. + +ng, okay. + +12 Otl charge how ouch an hour? + +i/ + +All right. Do you have any other opinions + +5 t 're working on in this case? + +Ii A. to this case, no. + +Q. And you have worked as an expert for + +0 Mr. before; correct? + +• A. Yes. + +▪ **Q. in what vise was that, sir?** + +**II That was the v. Maxwell case.** + +**12 Again, it was a little -- I don't know. Yeah,** + +**11 the whole lawyering, how you lawyers handle this. I A, don't understand.** + +**with him on another -- on that case.** + +**• 0. Yell, it'a a Case that you list with** + +**• lfr. tcheard'• ninon In your rumen isn't It?** + +**• A. Yes. that's what I mean. Hokindof** + +**) originally retained no but then went to another law t fire, so I )use didn't understand.** + +7 Q. Explain tome What you moon by that, Please. + +▪ **SOW. originally retained you and then what f happened?** + +**se ss** A. Then a different law tire -- 7 kind of dealt with a lawyer alnoat exclusively from • different tirt. + +**12 So, you know, I don't tnow -- I listed both.** + +**I) O. All right. And what wor asked .:, 14 in that case?** + +**IS A. In that particul arr ca** as caked to -- + +**la** 16 Mb. Maxwell called and sorbed to 17 look up the dissent particular statement: 16 on-line. + +Is O. So you ntially doing the seem work in 20 that co that you're doing in this case + +21 + +2, than the statements being different. 2 I very niter. And there were scam other things h. + +IS S fri O. l'n sorry, I didn't understand you. + +is ticular case. + +What I'm saying there were a tow other thing: + +7 but the basic process and procaine were the same. + +Q. Okay. And the statement that you were provide + +in the surveil case, was that -- that you were suogosed 5 to research, was that provided to you by Mr. + +h. Not by Mr. + +By hie co-counsel? + +• A. Another lawyer involved in the case, yes. + +10 MR. LINK; All right. I don't have any of Se' Questions. + +Jack. + +Is CROSS EXAMINATION + +12 BY MR. SCAPOLA: + +It You were asked questions about articles the, + +is (puts] re and whether you had non any articles that + +IS quoted defense counsel. to you recall that? + +I? A. Yes, I recall that. + +Is 0. Go beet to Exhibit Moron 9. if you would, at please. + +20 Yes, sir. + +ts 0. In this exhibit there is in paragraph 4 a 22 direct twee attributed to so -- + +22 Yes. + +24 -- correct? + +22 I Me that. + +Q. It says, quote: "This has been a long time coming, and we're extremely anxious to have the I opportunity, for the first time, to lay out in detail 4 the terrible nature of Jeffrey Cpatein's serial abuse of dozens and dozens of children," unquote; correct? A. Correct. + +0. It's not possible to make a determination from 4 what's included in this article whether that quote was ) from a statement mode in court or out of court; is it? + +A. Mot to me, no. tt I2 going down two more paragraphs it reads: "At fI • calendar call on Friday, told lawyers for both Ire sides that he would have to specially set the trial Io because of several factors: its estimated length, 'Mr. Epstein's criminal issues.' Porai-schese allegations surrounding former boss, and the expected a length of the time it will take to select jurors." + +:) I want you to assume that the •=l• that is 20 referenced as is described in 1, 2, 3, 4 -- the fifth 71 paragraph is Circuit Judge David IIII. Okay? 2 Okay. + +23 Q. The next quote that appears is • quote from 24 the Judge himself, quote: "'With Mr. Scarola doing the 2I voir dire, it's going to take • long time to get the • r one of Mr. rpetoin's lawyers, according to to,, + +S 4 a That would be • tabor,. yea. Or at least after the scheduling session? A. Yeah. O. another the conversation took place In the coartroeft after the court proceeding or outside the courtnmoe, this report -- + +? Yeah. a -- suggests that the lawyer was speaking to a the press after the court proceeding. + +10 Md It goes on t0 say, quote: "'So it's going 11 to take a lot of prospective jurors to find somebody It that doesn't already have an opinion in rd to son., IS of the people involved.'" Correct? + +it A. Correct. IS 0. Okay. Then we have t ific paragraph 16 that you identified as t qualified this 17 article for inclus correct? + +Is A. Cor 19 0. Md if d0iin to the bottom of the per. 20 we then following state:rant, one paragraph cr: SI Coin's attorney, declined to say 22 ent will be in the courtrcon and/or r wit: testify." + +2\he Then we have a direct quote attributed to + +°IS " + +on the defense. you SO w0 know that the Judge le + :- we'll rake decisions based upon what the plaintiffs do.' said. 'Men you're have to + +2 ) well; correct? Haddad I the process,' Sterols said." article. Fred Haddad. quote: ''We're defending this and + +4 Ilh-huh, correct. 4 see what the offense does first. The trial will be very 1 And it is probably interesting. There are a lot of legal issues as well , i MR. MR: And I IWO abatement by Jul\* factual issues.'" r IM Did : reed that accurately? a MR. SCAROLA: h u and Judge IIII at, A. it seemed accurate to re, yes. ) likely a to in t regard. Okay. So toeing back to a (petition that was + +tO BY KR. asked of you by mr. Link earlier, he asked to whether It Q a only there's some court proceeding II there were quotes from Mr. Epstein's lawyers in any of lo atonable assumption? la blest this one article. two of ter. gpotein's lawyers ,• Reasonable assumption based on those two 14 were both speaking to the press outside the courtroom; pa apps, yeah. 15 correct? + +on at which the Judge made this I? the press article., we have now confined that in at + +ti Q. Then the next paragraph reads, quote: "The 16 A. Correct. 4 one of the Epstein's attorneys, after the la articles that you were able to identify to be sure tps• scheduling session.' 19 there was a statement included In each of those 104 + +people involved are pretty well-known,' said Cheater il O. Okay. Did you actually read each of the ,(4 of Mr. Epstein's lawyers was speaking to the press 24 Q. All right. So Mr. Link has gone through • few + +21 Do you see that? 20 articles that linked I l I l to participation in , I A. Yes, I see that. 21 Scott Rothstein's massive Penal scheme, :2 0. So, we know, assuming the accuracy of this 22 Yes. : reed either the entire article or op I report, that Kr. Epstein's loners were speaking or one 23 to the point where I round this statecent. 21 outside the courtroom; correct? 2S or those, and :is not sure how he selected the ones that + +he selected, but he's gone through a few. But if we 2 were to go through each of these 104 articles you would ) be able to identify a specific statement that associated 4 as a participant in this massive Ponri 5 Sc)...., is that correct? + +That's correct, I did it. + +O. You have reached the conclusion that that + +4 information was disseminated to an audience of over 9.. + +million people; correct? + +A. Correct. + +O. Did you come to a conclusion as to the + +,2 likelihood of whether the actual number of individuals + +,1 to whom that statement was disseminated exceeded 9.6 + +.4 million people? + +,1 MR. LIMN: Object to the form. + +tt Well. yes. as + +:1 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. Before you answer + +the question, what's the problem with the form? + +:1 MR. LIMB: It assumes that -- the way you + +20 asked that readers actually saw the statement + +It versus it being disseminated in the web page that + +22 people touched. Its testified he could not identify + +2) who in fact or the number that saw the statement. + +24 MR. SCRROLA: Okay. Well, I think you've + +21 mischaracterized my question, but just to be aural + +I 9.645.542. The first Is that obviously I couldn't + +2 locate all the articles by the tire I filed soy 414011. + +I So there's certainly articles out there that 7 haven', + +4 located by the tire I submitted the report. I only + +looked at on-Rae sources. I didn't deal with prints or + +, broadcasts or anything like that. I didn't -- + +Cp. So, for wimple -- and I apologise for + +. Interrupting you. But one or the websites that we've + +1 particularly focused en is the Pain Beach Deily News, + +10 also phone as The shiny sheet. But what you looted at + +II were electronic accesses to their we/salted correct? + +12 That Is correct. + +IS You did not include the f individual, + +14 who subecribe to that newspape S livered to + +IS their hove; correct? + +IS That's our .0 de those. + +17 O. You didn' number of tines that + +le people went to t it local, re all store and bought a + +49 copy of The Shiny tl tit's not included in your + +20 calcula + +21 + +22 7 e sane would be true with regard to each + +S : o We it.\* which alp he. a corresponding hard + +" ite • re. the Palm Beach Post. the Sun-Sentinel, the + +Alk nuttier.. the Palm Beach Deily Hews, the -- + +4 + +let se make sure that I ask the gmes n the war 2 I intended it to be answered. + +1 BY MR. SCARCER: + +O. Can you toll us whet on you + +5 reached that these statements re die Ni WO to an + +audience of 9.6 million people ervative -- + +MR. LIMB: Objection. + +a BY MR. SCAROLA: + +'s conservative -- very conservative + +11 number in my report. + +rib\* for W benefit of the jurors, if + +U /,■ **ion, why it is your opinion that the more** + +**million number to which you have testified is a** + +**:5 c ative assessment of the number of people to whom** + +•I these statements were disseminated? + +:\$ + +20 + +21 refer to my report + +22 O. By all means. + +24 Conservative approach to the dissemination number + +2\$ calculation. So likely much -- much more than + +Okay. + +MR. LIM: Object to the form. A. I think to address this properly if T can just + +-- as the best way to address it. + +Well, I had like 12 reasons why I took a very + +a A. Yes. I also didn't include statements in + +Miami Herald, The New York Tires. or any or the other + +periodicals that have both hard copies and wcbsite + +access; correct? + +A. Correct. + +Okay. So you were describing the reasons why + +your number of distributions is conservative and I + +interrupted you. So pick m0, if you would, please. + +9 book Filthy Rich that was distributed, written by + +40 kr. Smes Patterson. + +II 0. Okay. There was an exhibit narked that rad: + +ir rrrrrrrrr to that book. That was rshibit Weber 4. A. + +I? while this exhibit rakes reference to the book, it 1s + +44 notoneof those articles that contained -- Exhibit + +as weber 4 is not an article that contained an express + +44 reference to the relationship between \_ al and the Rothstein Prat scheme: correct? + +is That's correct. + +10 0. But do you know whether the book itself + +20 contains express references to allegations that =MI + +21 was a knowing participant in the Manzi scheme, + +22 Yes, I know it does. + +SS 0. Okay. But you didn't include any of those + +24 James Patterson books that were sold in hard copy, that + +25 got distributed through electronic means or wound 45 as + +THE VIDEOGRAFTER; The time is 11:04. We're now going off the record. iThereuporn at 11:04 p.m. a recess was taken until 11:11 a.m., ater which the deposition continued as follows:) + +TRY VIDECGRAPIIER: The tine is 11:11. We're back on the record. This is the beginning of Tap\* 2. BY MR. SCAROLA: + +Q. At the point at which we took our break you were describing for the benefit of the Jury why the more than 9.6 million number is • conservative estimate of the number of people to whom the statements that you \ have identified were distributed, acknowledging that + +I whether they read them or not is not sone 2 YOU'n looked at, but these were peopl tO ) were distributed. 4 SO why -- why elm d the number + +1 to be a Conservative number? A. Yes. I didn't inclu ace-to-face , dissemination of peopl glking about the statements. 7 didn't include any pri ) e-mail, and a like t in\* correspondence, like + +\*Mere then likely lates that had the II sate no longer access. And, actually, r rrn of those. i just couldn't get the ctivities, a few things like that. So elude those. + +Of these 14 sites that contained the article, I only included traffic for SS percent of them because the traffic number for the other sites -- the other 43 sites I just didn't feel comfortable that the numbers were valid. So of the /4 sites -- of that 9.6 million plus, even though the article -- I know the article was posted on the 14 sites, I only included the traffic for 50 percent of those sites. :\$ 2 1 + +0. And why did you consider the other traffic numbers not to be reliable? What distinguished those from those that you felt were sufficiently reliable? ) 24 7) + +I audio books? pone of that's included, correct? 2 Correct. 1 And obviously you don't know how many times 4 people who bought that book loaned it out to their \$ spouses, their friends, and neighbors, so that they I could read it, correct? A. Correct. 0. Okay. I have been given a notice that we ere almost about to run out of tape, so we'll break right there. We'll take a short break; let them change the tape. + +A. As I mentioned -- talked about this in ny report. They were tyPICally sites that were very. vc large or very small. So like, you know, sore the larger sites, It's + +that -- maybe : , 11 give you • good example here. Like the PressAeader, for example, that is a site that presents a IOC of articles from A lot of different newspapers. And so the traffic numbers that I was getting were, you know, very inflated I felt, so I did not include those ranters. + +On the other sites, there are • lot of blog Si sites and stuff like that from 'India that didn't 11 get a lot of traffic. Again. I fe those 14 numbers were not reliable or I IS did not include those. + +ilS1 + +do could be at • different site. follow the link 21 didn't include sites that had articles 22 't have the statements but a link to en A 14 t t had the state,tnts. de unless it \*Cies, exactly in the article, : didn't include it. + +16 o. Okay. Contim d. describing -- 17 Yes. le your assertion that the 9.6 19 million dollar n excuse re, the 9.6 nillieo 20 number native number. + +2 and could actually see it, but : didn't include those. Many of these sites publish multiple articic 1 on waltiple different days that contains the atatere-t-4 And there is an aspect of return readership. So 1 S didn't want to double-count traffic, so just to make it 6 very conservative even if they published \*even articles 1 or five, I only counted it one tire. So 2 didn't coi-i the multiple days. + +9 And then also search results. Some of the 10 queries that I wee using, you could \*Omit the gem ard 11 you could see the actual statements in the search if results. You didn't need to go to the site. 12 So. like co my report co page 21 7 give sere 14 rumples there that just enter • query and you see the IS actual statement\* In the search results. You don't even I6 need to go to the site to -- I mhen, you don't even need II to technically read the article. You just like search le and type in the query. + +10 0. Old you take into account In any way that 20 multiple individuals ray be accessing the sites 21 simultaneously? Come on over rare and take a look at ay 22 monitor and sea what's being reported about Brad + +22 24 A. No, : did not include those. 25 Q. And what about the private forwarding or '7 A. Yes. 0. Did you utilize methodologlea that are generally accepted within your area of expertise as accurate means by which to reach the conclusions that yOu've reached? + +:4 :4 ti A. Yes. 0. AM are the opinions that you have expressed, both In your written report and In your sworn testimony today. opinions that you hold to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty within your area of expertise? + +7 20 Yee. MR. SCAROLT: Thank you. I have no further questions. + +22 23 24 MR. LIM dust a couple. REDIRECT EXAMINATICN BY MR. LINK: + +2) Take a loot at Exhibit 9 that Mr. Sterols w + +webalte information, did you tate that into account at 2 all? + +As I mentioned, no, I didn't do any e-mail or 4 private forwarding, or anything like that. + +Q. to conducting this work, did you rely upon I sources that are generally relied upon and considered to ' be credible and authoritative within your area of • expertiae? + +:0 A. Co please point to anywhere in this + +It attic] attorneys said anything Ss? + +• , let me lust loot in the article. I • quote. + +:5 All right. And Mr. Scarola pointed out three different statements. One by Mr. and two by Mr. Haddad. + +:\$ 20 And is there anything in what Mr. Or Mr. Haddad maid to the press that fits one of the search parameter\* you were looking for? + +77 Free those statements? Yea, sir, that you were searching for. + +'1 A. No. I thought that my question was -- you mean in tern of the article or in terms of the statements from those lawyers? + +SV + +asking you about, please. Yea, ear. + +It's The Shiny Sheet art 0th. + +2013. Do you have that in fr Yes. sir. + +Mr. Scuola pointed o o of places whore Mr. restein's I s were either quoted or had a statement attributed to orrect? + +0. Ho. the statements ikon the lawyers. Mr. Scarola wont through in a painstaking way to show yo the three areas In this article to 4 Mr. Ppetein's :ay/yore. And \$41 asking you Sr Mr. kpateln'S lawyers waft any Staten et about 6 Mr. that would have triggered a hit In year 7 search results? + +a A. Hot that I ace, no. 9 Can you point to any article that you reviewed 10 that contains a staterent -- a quote by Mr. Epstein's II lawyer that would have triggered a hit on your search sr request? 12 A. Okay. again. 2 was lust for the 14 particuler statenents. 2 diets' ate i t was a IS quote Iron a lawyer, but I don' all + +36 Q. And do you Cron Kr. Paste-- 17 hireelf in any of aril a that you reviewed, 16 all 104 that you old Mr. Scarola that you read the 19 entire article, t hod quote from Mr. mpetein that 20 would h r scare' request? Ii t answer this, i lust want to clarify. + +2e \ • licre 2 • 0 read it up to O 4 point where 1 found 04 . but I don't recall a staterent from air eptein. -- I said that I either read the entire + +Do you renerber seeing a press release by ` Me. Epstein related to Fe. in any way? + +A. A press release tram Sr. Apatein? 4 O. Tee, vir. + +A. I don't recall a press release !ma + +Kr. Epstein. MR. LINK: Okay. I have no other questions. + +MR. SCAROIA: And t have no further questions. MR. LINK: Thank you. + +Is MX. etAxiMAI We will reed. 11 SAE VIDEOGRAPNER: the tire is 11:21. me \$4 + +12 off the record. This cultic\*\* today's deposition. Is ifnereupen, the taking of the deposition wee 14 concluded at 11:21 a.sl IS + +IS sr Is it + +1 EXCEPT FOR THE CORRECTIONS MADE +2 HEREIN ON THE ERRATA SHEET BY ME, +3 I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE AND +4 ACCURATE TRANSCRIPT. FURTHER +5 DEPONENT SAYETH NOT. + +6 \_\_\_\_\_ +7 DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN + +8 STATE OF FLORIDA) +9 ) SS: +10 COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) + +11 Sworn and subscribed to before me +12 this \_\_\_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_, 2017. +13 PERSONALLY KNOWN \_\_\_\_\_ OR I.D. \_\_\_\_\_ + +14 \_\_\_\_\_ +15 Notary Public in and for the +16 State of Florida at Large +17 My Commission Expires: + +1 CERTIFICATE OF OATH +2 +3 STATE OF FLORIDA) +4 ) SS +5 COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) +6 +7 I, the undersigned authority, certify that +8 DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN personally appeared before me and +9 was duly sworn. +10 +11 WITNESS my hand and official seal this 4th day +12 of December, 2017. + +13 \_\_\_\_\_ +14 ILIANA LUGO +15 Notary Public - State of Florida +16 Commission No. DD733630 +17 Commission Expires: 11/08/2019 + +1 ERRATA SHEET +2 IN RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. +3 Case No. 50-2009CA04080DXXXXXBAG +4 DEPO OF: DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN 12/1/17 +5 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER ANY CHANGES HERE +6 Page-Line # Change Reason + +| Page-Line # | Change | Reason | +|-------------|--------|--------| +| 6 | | | +| 7 | | | +| 8 | | | +| 9 | | | +| 10 | | | +| 11 | | | +| 12 | | | +| 13 | | | +| 14 | | | +| 15 | | | +| 16 | | | +| 17 | | | + +18 STATE OF FLORIDA) +19 ) SS +20 COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) + +21 Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I +22 have read my deposition transcript, and it is true and +23 correct subject to any changes in form or substance +24 entered here. + +25 Date \_\_\_\_\_ Signature \_\_\_\_\_ + +1 REPORTER'S DEPOSITION CERTIFICATE +2 +3 STATE OF FLORIDA) +4 ) SS +5 COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) + +6 I, Iliana Lugo, Court Reporter, certify that I +7 was authorized to and did stenographically report the +8 deposition of DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN; that a review of +9 the transcript was requested; and that the transcript is +10 a true and correct record of my stenographic notes. +11 I further certify that I am not a relative, +12 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, +13 parties' attorney, or counsel connected with the action, +14 nor am I financially interested in the action. +15 DATED this 4th day of December, 2017. + +16 \_\_\_\_\_ +17 ILIANA LUGO, Court Reporter + +/ 3 4 December 5, 2017 OR. REARM)) J. JANSEN c/o Searcy, Donny, Startle, Barnhart L Shipley, P.A. Attn: Jack Scarola, Req. I 2139 Pals Beach Lakes noulevard Rest Palm Beach, Florida 33409 4 in Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. 4 Case No.: 50-2009CA040000/0003IRAG Repo of: Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Taken on: December 1, 2017 I of pages: SS Reid Until: January 6, 2018 ) Dear Dr. Jansen: )0 This letter is to advise you that the transcript of your deposition taken in the above-referenced 1! cause has been completed and is awaiting your reading and signing. , ') Please contact our office to make arrangenents to real and sign your deposition transcript. :4 Our information is as follows: 1) Pals Reach Reporting 1665 Pals Reach Laker, acuity°, . :4 Suite 1001 Nest Pals Beach, Florida 33401 t .1 O 'S Telophene (561) 471-7995 lf the reeding and signing has not been complete) prior to January 4, 2010, we shall conclude that you have waived the reading and signing of the :4 I , transcript. 21 Your precept attention to this matter is appreciated. 2: Sincerely, 2/ :, !liana Lugo, Court Reporter cc Scott J. Link, Esq., Esq. :4 Jack SCarola, Rag. 2t + +A 4Isy + +O ?Sire tlir + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, + +vs. +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, +Defendants. + +VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +May 15th, 2013 +10:00 A.M. - 12:20 P.M. + +401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400 +Fort Lauderdale, FL + +Stenographically Reported By: +WENDY [REDACTED], RPR +Notary Public, State of Florida +Empire Legal Support, Inc. +Fort Lauderdale Office +Phone: (954)241-1010 + +APPEARANCES: +ATTORNEY(S) FOR MR. EPSTEIN: +TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE +Tonja Haddad, PA +315 SE 7th St Ste 301 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333013158 +Phone: 954.467.1223 +Fax: 954.337.3716 +E-Mail: Tonja@tonjahaddad.com +FRED HADDAD, ESQUIRE +Fred Haddad PA +1 Financial Plz Ste 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333940061 +Phone: 954.467.6767 +Fax: 954.467.3599 +E-Mail: Haddadfin@aol.com +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE +Atterbury Goldberger Et Al +250 S Australian Ave Ste 1400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 334015015 +Phone: 561.659.8300 +Fax: 561.835.8691 +E-Mail: Jgoldberger@agwpa.com +ATTORNEY FOR BRADLEY EDWARDS: +WILLIAM [REDACTED] ESQUIRE +Scarcy Denney Scarola Et Al +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd +West Palm Beach, Florida 334096601 +Phone: 561.686.6300 +Fax: 561.684.5816 +E-Mail: Wbk@scarcylaw.com + +ALSO PRESENT: JEFF EPSTEIN, PLAINTIFF +DEBRA FEIN, LAW CLERK + +1 Videotape Deposition taken before Wendy [REDACTED], +2 Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in +3 and for the State of Florida at Large, in the above +4 cause. + +5 --- +6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the video +7 record. Today's date is May 15th, 2013. The time +8 is 10:17 a.m. This is the video deposition of +9 [REDACTED] taken in the matter of Jeffrey +10 Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Case +11 No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. + +12 We're located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, +13 Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The court reporter is +14 Wendy [REDACTED], the videographer is Anthony Estevez, +15 both with Empire Legal. + +16 Would counsel please state their appearances +17 for the record. + +18 MR. [REDACTED]: William [REDACTED], Scarcy Denney Scarola +19 Barnhart & Shipley for Mr. [REDACTED]. + +20 MR. HADDAD: Fred Haddad on behalf of Jeff +21 Epstein. + +22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Jack Goldberger, Atterbury, +23 Goldberger & Weiss on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. + +24 MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: Tonja Haddad Coleman on +25 behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. + +1 produced this time record. (With respect to reputation, 2 (I believe that over the course of the lasthi ),, 3 !have done a pretty darn good job resurrecting any damage. 4 (that was done to my reputation in this imnity. contr + +5 Q Well, let's — let's start with that. You 6 don't -- you never had a reputation damage, did you? 7 MR. : Objection, form. 8 BY MR. HADDAD: + +9 Q Okay. What damage, if any, did you initially 10 have done to your reputation by the filing of a lawsuit 11 against you that suggested that you were so aggressive 12 as a lawyer someone was going to sue you? + +13 A No, the lawsuit that was filed against me — 14 MR. Object to form, argumentative. + +15 A The lawsuit that was filed — 16 MR. HADDAD: I was paying a compliment. 17 MR.= Yes. 18 Go ahead. + +19 A The lawsuit that was filed against me said 20 that I was part of some racketeering scheme, said that I 21 was involved in a Ponzi scheme, that I was 22 co-conspirator of Scott Rothstein's and that I was 23 committing fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. A 24 bunch of.criminal actions were alleged against me. In 25 fact, I think the complaint was entirely crimes that I + +1 had committed as a lawyer, which is the exact opposite 2 of the type of reputation that you want as a lawyer. 3 With that being said, that complaint, the 4 various motions making those allegations about S some form of co-conspirator in a Ponzi sche 6 repeatedly filed and stated on the record anti 7 hallways over at the bankruptcy court, because e 8 lawyer who was anybody in South Florida had something to 9 do with the bankruptcy proceedings over at the 10 bankruptcy court. So I had to go over there 11 continuously and fend off these lawyers who believed 12 that there must be some merit to it, because somebody 13 who has a lot of money is hiring lawyers who have a 14 pretty good reputation to say these things, there's got 15 to be something to it. 16 BY MR. HADDAM—) + +17 Q Name one case in which you were impleaded 18 because of your alleged involvement with Scott 19 Rothstein? + +20 A I did not lose a single client. 21 Q Name one — no, name one person who impleaded 22 you, one other person in bankruptcy court, whether It be 23 the clawback scheme, whether it be Shears, whatever the 24 hell he calls what he did, whatever you call any of that 25 stuff; name one person that impleaded you or asked + +you —joined you as party or a -- 1 + +A It didn't happen. Q — defendant or anything? A That did not happen. 2 3 4 + +Q Name one person, other than this lawsuit, which well get into later, other than this lawsuit, what newspaper article, what Daily Review article, what any article accused you of being involved in the Scott Rothstein debacle? 5 6 7 8 + +A I can't recite them off of my head. Q Is there any? 10 11 + +A I believe that newspaper articles were written when the lawsuit was filed about me and Scott being accused of being some to-comparator ina Ponzi scheme, yes. 12 13 14 15 + +Q All right. There.were newspaper articles written quoting a pleading as opposed to someone suggesting you arkttittgeolminal act; is that correct? 16 17 18 19 + +A I don't know thedistinction that you are trying to make. 20 21 + +Q We'll worry about that later, I'm just asking you; do you know whether or not it was someone quoting a 4newspaper-- a — a — a legal pleading, or was It a Indivridual making an accusation that you were a 22 23 24 25 + +44S , 'gb + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Q Pm asking you, was there anything other was there any person, reporter, anyone, any of the people you had all of these thousands of e-mails with, anyone who suggested that you were a criminal, other than the pleading filed that suggested because of Rothstein's inclusion of your cases as part of the basis for his Ponzi scheme that you were involved, other than that lawsuit? + +12 A People believed that I was involved. + +13 14 15 Q Who expressed that to you? You're a young lawyer, you're in the courthouse every day or almost every day, you're around town, correct? + +16 A Yes. + +17 18 19 20 Q You go to different restaurants. Name one person that came tip to you and said, I can't believe you are not in jail, you are a Ponzi scheme or you arc anything, name one person -- + +21 22 23 24 25 A There were lawyers over at the bankruptcy court, when I had to sit there listening to the things that were being said, that told me, you are going to be a target of mine given this information that we - that — that is being told to us by Jeffrey Epstein and + +criminal? + +A The legal pleading made an accusation that I was a criminal and that was reported on. + +EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. (954) 241-1010 + +7 (Pages 25 to 28) + +1 BY MR. HADDAD: + +2 Q Well, let me ask you this: In -- + +3 A (Do I believe that right now my reputation is +4 better than it has been at any time in the past, yes! + +5 Q All right. And as a matter of fact, since the +6 Rothstein case, you're now included, probably one of the +7 youngest guys there is, in Best Lawyers in America, +8 correct? + +9 A Probably. + +10 Q All right. There are not many guys that have +11 been practicing 11 years to be included in that. + +12 A I agree. + +13 Q And that is 100 percent for old people like +14 Goldberger, for the most part. You are included in that +15 based upon peer review and nothing else? + +16 A That's true. + +17 Q You -- + +18 A I mean, I don't ac -- actually don't know the +19 answer to that. I -- if you are saying that's what it +20 is, it might be. + +21 Q Did you solicit anybody to become in that? + +22 A No. + +23 Q Did you receive a letter saying you have been +24 nominated for Best Lawyers in America? + +25 A I don't think so. + +1 Q No, you just got a notice one day that you -- + +2 A Right. + +3 Q -- are included, correct? + +4 A Right, that's true. + +5 Q Out of the whole world, out of thousands of +6 lawyers practicing law 10 years, you are notified, hey, +7 you are one of the best lawyers in America for what you +8 do? + +9 A Right. + +10 Q Okay. Now, you also are one of the top 40 +11 lawyers under 40, correct? + +12 A Right. + +13 Q You are 37 years old? + +14 A Correct. + +15 Q And you are considered one of the top trial +16 lawyers in Florida? + +17 A Right. + +18 Q There is a group called the Top 100 Trial +19 Lawyers in America, correct? + +20 A I think so. + +21 Q That's part of what you are in? + +22 A Okay. + +23 Q Yeah, they have the top 100 trial lawyers for +24 old guys like Goldberger, Scarola, part of his firm and +25 all those old people, correct? + +1 A Maybe I should pay more attention to those +2 things. I don't know about all those old people. + +3 Q Well, you do have -- I look at it from what +4 you do with them. Come on Brad, you have an ego, +5 everybody does. At any rate, you are considered in the +6 top 40 under 40, in that group, correct? + +7 A Right. + +8 Q And have you ever looked on the Web site for +9 that group to see the type of lawyers that are included +in that? + +10 A No. + +11 Q Okay. And you have that distinction of being +12 included and you promote it with your -- as most lawyers +13 would, correct? + +14 A Personally, I don't, but I know that my law +15 firm does. I mean, we do have a PR firm for our law +16 firm. + +17 Q [REDACTED] is that who does all of that stuff? + +18 A Yeah. + +19 Q I mean, this is about a month's worth. All +20 right. + +21 A You looked at a lot more than I have. + +22 Q I have to do something to earn the money I +23 make. + +24 A Thank goodness, right. + +1 Q Now, you are also -- there is another service +2 called AVVO, are you familiar with that? + +3 A Yes. + +4 Q All right. And that's another unsolicited -- +5 out of the top 40 under 40, you can't buy your way into +6 that one either, you didn't know you were getting that, +7 correct? + +8 A That's true. + +9 Q You get a notice, hey, you have just been +10 included in all of this stuff, whether you like it or +11 not, you are considered one of the top lawyers in +12 Florida. + +13 A That's true. + +14 Q Okay. Then you have AVVO where people can +15 arrest -- arrest, I see arrest records, two secrets +16 under your name here. I guess that is part of the +17 advertising that goes with having a Web site or +18 something. Five [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing attorneys +19 recognizes the best lawyers in America, that is pretty +20 good for a bunch of young lawyers, yeah? + +21 A Yeah. + +22 Q And AVVO, another one. Do you participate in +23 their promotion, AVVO, they promote lawyers I think, do +24 you participate in that at all? + +25 A Not really. + +11 (Pages 41 to 44) + +EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. +(954) 241-1010 + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 me let you finish your question. A Donald Baker, is that the — MS. HADDAD EMAN: No, it's different. THE WITNESS: M, different. BY MR. HADDAD: Q M, you got sued twice? A Apparently. Q All right. And then did -- let me ask you about the -- I had it right here. A 1 convicted some guy, he went to prison and then sued the judge and every -- all the police and everything else. MR. GOLDBERGER: Here you go. MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: This guy's name Is different. MR. HADDAD: Yeah, Shaarbay, Sharbasom. I guess that must be — MR. GOLDBERGER: Spell it. MR. HADDAD: the Arab guy. S-H-A-A-R-B-A-Y versus — A News to me. BY MR. HADDAD: Q — various persons. Were you ever served with a lawsuit? Among the persons sued was — A No. + +1 Q Pete Weinstein, Michael Gates, Finkelstein, 2 Satz, Dan Callahan, Brad =. 3 A No. I don't recognize that person's name. I 4 have never been served with that lawsuit, to my 5 recollection. 6 Q To your recollection, okay. 7 A No. 8 Q All right. But you said there est r 9 one, who else sued you? 10 A Donald Baker sued me and Mike Satz and Michael 11 Gates and all of the Hollywood Police Department. 12 Q And what happened with that case? 13 A It was dismissed. 14 Q All right. Would those predate the time that 15 you were sued by Mr. P4stein? 16 A Yes. 17 Q Okay. Now, tell me how — 18 A Well, don't know about this new one that you 19 just told me about it, it may have been yesterday for 20 all I know. 21 Q .right. 22 A I am unaware of it. 23 Q Emotional distress, embarrassment, mental 24 anguish, humiliation, I will start with those, because 25 we know loss of reputation and standing in the community + +1 doesn't exist correct? 2 MR. =: Objection. 3 BY MR. HADDAD: 4 Q You concede that? 5 MR. Objection, argumentative. 6 BY MR. HADDAD: 7 Q Well, would you concede — never mind, we went 8 through it already. 9 A Yeah, we — we talked about this. 10 Q I understand. Can you detail for me the 11 emotional distress, embarrassment, mental anguish and 12 humiliation -- 13 A Okay. 14 Q —that you have? 15 A Where I was begin 16 Q Yes, sir. 17 A — when we wen talk dbout reputation. I 18 do believe that I have always racked with the utmost 19 honest, integrity. And when a lawsuit was filed against 20 me accusing me of being dishonest and being a criminal 21 or — to truncate this — and I had to continue to go to 22 court and see lawyers who, for a period of time, and I 23 do believe that once the case was dismissed against me, 24 that window closed, but for a period of time they 25f %ISieved , /the allegations against me. I think that there + +sS, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 was probably a point in time, based on some of the e-mails that I have seen, that your co-counsel Tonja believed that, which in terms of hurt feelings type of things, yeah, that -- that wasn't — that wasn't something that I appreciated either. But having to be in a courtroom where lawyers believed that I had done these things that I had not done, it was humiliating. Now there is another aspect of it which I consider to be much more significant, because as we've discussed, the case was dismissed against me and I do feel that separate and apart from any involvement that I have had prosecuting cases against Jeffrey Epstein,(0 (have done a good job of resurrecting my reputation fap the point in time where people initially believed, hey) where there is smoke there is fire or something t his guy must be guilty of something.iliultl asmy perception of things and that's a reasonable perception based on what was filed. Q All right. And I don't want — I am not going to be argumentative with you, obviously, but based upon what the entirely of what the Ponzi scheme is, just being involved in it, just being in that firm with your cases there would give that perception to people, wouldn't you agree? A No. I think that most lawyers escaped fairly + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND. FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE 502009dA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +DefendantS, + +A fr, lis" i VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION N OF + +. + +VO IE OF II + +110 - 250 + +( 2.) October 10th, 2013 + +10:00 A.M. - 2:30 P.M. + +4\_;SD'.1 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400 Fort Lauderdale, FL + +Stenographically Reported By: WENDY RPR Notary Public, State ol Florida Empire Legal Support, Inc Fort Laudetdale Office. Phone: 9.54)241-1010 + +> EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.. (954) ,11-10.1.0 + +1 are you claiming? + +2 MR. : You asked the same question last 3 time. + +4 MR. HADDAD: I don't remember it. I thought 5 the last time we said you -- taking time away from 6 your family and that stuff for economica + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. : He went -- but he went o great detail, as you might recall, where t 1 ed about the fact that, you know, he would to the -- he would go over to the Courtho e nd lawyers would look at him, and his rep i. was -- was impacted by that and what -- wt1 h was truncate that lat able to do to + +14 MR. HADDA P( Yo + +15 BY MR. HADDAD: + +16 Q Do y&i s111 maintain that stuff? + +17 A (As (said then,)(have I done a aood job at) + +18 19 (resurrecting whatever damage was done?) (Yes,)al(did) Is there) - fs there + +20 21 22 23 ''I12, What was the -- what was the impact to you fr m supposed -- and I don't mean that pejoratively, damage to your reputation by being sued for being with Rothstein? + +24 25 A Uh, what -- for being falsely accused of committing crimes I didn't accuse by Epstein. + +2 3 4 5 6 If newspaper articles that were printed after the filing of the claim against me is something that would support that, then I guess to that extent, yes, but if you are asking about medical documents or anything like that, then the answer would be no. I'm not exactly sure what you are getting at but I + +7 8 A Q Well, for example, you are claimi our reputation was injured. 511) + +9 ARight. + +10 11 12 Q And based on the elemen proof required to prove injury to damage to rep there are certain factors that you must meet 1SK k + +13 ARight. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Q I'm askin have any physical documentation or you've objected to all your financial info so I guess my question in plain English is: ow are you going to prove that you have any ki ecuniary -- pecuniary loss as a result of an 7AI have not claimed an economic loss as a) (result of my reputation). Ihaven't. And the only thing that I can say to answer your question is, I know who has hired me. I will never know who would have hired me but elected not to because of what it was that they + +Assr + +EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. (954) 241-1010 + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### I. INTRODUCTION + +1. I have been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analysis and opinion on behalf of Mr. J. in the case originally styled Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff, vs. Scott Rothstein, individually, Mr. J. individually, and L. M., individually, Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XX30GMBAG, which is pending in the Circuit Court of the 15'h Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach Coun S + +### II. QUALIFICATIONS + +2. I am an adjunct professor at the College of Informatio C and Technology at The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsy ia, ' e 2017, where I have been employed since 2001. I was a tenure-track professo ti nnsylvania State University from 2009 through 2016, departing as a tenured full 14c , 2017. I am a principal scientist at the Qatar Computing Research Institute. I w n Fellow at the Pew Internet & American Life Project, which is part of the Pew R ter, from 2010-2012. I was a University Expert at the National Ground Intelligenc ate eom 2011 through 2014. Prior to my employment at The Pennsylvania State Unive as a Lecturer in the Computer Science Program at the University of Maryland ( ' Division) for 1 year, and before that, I was an Assistant Professor in the Departmen lect I Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy, a. oint, for 3 years. + +addition to my academic credentials, my professional experience includes 20 years of practice in the U.S. military, serving in the Infantry as an enlisted soldier and then as a communications officer, working primarily in a variety of information technology-related positions. + +4. I have authored approximately 250 academic publications, focusing on the areas of Web data, digital analytics, Web analytics, Web searching, Web search engines, social media, and + +related areas. Approximately 200 of my publications address aspects of search analytics, Web analytics, online advertising, search engines, or Web searching. My recent research work focuses on online news analytics, which is the investigation of the online qualitative and quantitative attributes of news stories with other digital content, and social computing analytics, which is the investigation of social behavior using algorithmic methods. I am also the editor-in hief of the international academic journal, Information Processing and Management which p journal in information science field, and former editor-in-chief of the journal, In a topranked journal in the web science domain. I have authored, co-autho Ci, do ited four books, including Web Search: Public Searching of the Web (2004skUn anding User — Web Interactions via Web Analytics (2009) and Understandi Med Search (2011). A copy of my complete Curriculum Vitae, which includes a lis Sa oc, ications I have authored in the past 10 years, is attached as Appendix A. + +5. My of profession "Itaiepert include web analytics, search engines, web searching, social media, online ad , nd related computer science and data science areas. In the course of my academi I have worked with a variety of search engines and information searching ap in order to understand user searching behavior on the Web and other environme or ex ple, as part of my program in Computer Science, I designed and coded eased search engine. For my Doctorate program in Computer Science, I devel gram interface for Web search engines and implemented it on the Gigabyte search engine. In subsequent research, I have worked with the Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) and Verity commercial searching systems. + +6. As a computer scientist, I have engaged and am experienced with the classic computer science areas, such as programming, software development, algorithms, and networking. + +I have done extensive server set-up and log analysis. As my project, for example, I designed and coded a tool for network performance evaluation and monitoring. I have taught a wide variety of computer courses, including microcomputing, programming (in various languages), and the Web/Intemet, at both the undergraduate and graduate level. + +7. Concerning user searching behaviors on the Web and web analytics, Ill ve worked directly with real-user searching data from several web search engines. I've als web data of visitor traffic and other attributes from a variety of websites and O • a platforms. I've analyzed real-user data from online search marketing campai websites. I have conducted research and teaching concerning as engine keyword advertising. I've developed web anal yti business goals, and I have used web analytics da V m,i iblIS?itr y research and teaching. I've also conducted other research on user searching b ifs ,. have advised government agencies and companies in consulting and expert wi att A list of cases in which I have testified as an expert in deposition or trial in years is attached as Appendix B. I am being compensated for my work on gy at the rate of \$400 per hour. referral traffic to sites, including search and processes for analysis of + +### III. ASSIGNMENT IATERIALS CONSIDERED + +8. In vidin my expert opinion, I have been asked to respond to the following question: 0 + +TrinhTlerelTaistrnurlitor2alf tng statements assoctirtaW73rrdleT, CEdwards with-lhe tlle721Wiwthes afliCSaft-Rolliffitn as a resullOfitirreffreVEglim 1) (lawsuit-adrit-MirEilltrwdi? + +10. For brevity, I refer to the statements associating Mr. with the illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein as a result of Mr. Epstein's lawsuit as the defaming statement; the statements, or the defaming statements associating Mr. with Rothstein's illegal activities. + +11. The defaming statements associate Mr. with the illegal activities of a Mr. Scott Rothstein, who is a "notorious Ponzi schemer'. Now a debarred lawyer, he is serving a 50 year prison sentence2 for operating the \$1.4 billion fraud from his Fort Lauderdalel m office, including forging the signatures of three federal judges on fake legal docusae yior to prison, in addition to spending money lavishly via the fruits of his fraud4, he resulting in some recipients having to return his charitable with a reported 16 million in US dollars8, he returned to ing to work with prosecutors in exchange for a reduced sentence. However, pros ,c ti§t, i drew the reduced sentence offer as they determined Mr. Rothstein lied during the • v ig on c and was attempting to hide assets9. a philanthropists, gtnally fleeing the US2 + +12. My analysis is based on tpy xpe ce, training, knowledge, and education and is formed through the application o rience, training, knowledge, and education in the + +I Ponzi schemer Scott Rothste to feds and should save 50-year prison tarn, prosecutors say http:J/www.sun-sentineLcorn/local/browardMreg-scott-mthstein- lion-20170926-storyhtml + +Miami, FL - Pon; Scott Rothstein Gets 50-year Sentence https://www.vosizneias.com/57450/2010/06/09/miami-fl-ponzi-schemerscott-rothstein tented; Florida Pony' schemer jailed for SI.2billion fraud currently saving a 50-year sentence and his wife officially divorce w.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3169768/Divorce-linalized- I -20-Porrei-schemez-Rothstein.htmlnixwleinn9pfa + +Miami, Pt, oiift Schemer Scott Rothstein Gets 50-year Sentence https://www.vosizneias.com/57450/20I0/06/09/miami-fl-porrei-schemerscoterothstcm-gos-50-year-saecnce + +Rothstein Reveals How \$ I.2 Billion Ponzi Scheme Money Was Spent http://miami.cbslocal.conV20I Ul2/30/rothstein-reveals-how- l -2-billionporrei-scheme-money-was-spent; The Ultimate Ponzi: Scott Rothstein Book Excerpts Reveal Juicy Details + +hitps://www.huflingtonpost.comr2Ol 3103/I 2/scott-rothstein-book-the-ultimate-ponzi\_n2862093.html; Scott Rothstein's Cheating Life + +http://www.browardpalmbeach.comfnews/scott-rothsteins-cheating-life-6444966 South Florida lawyer Scott Rothstein faces arrest in Ponzi scheme hllp://www.tampabay.corninews/politics/stateroundupisouth-florida-lawyer- + +scott-nathstein-faces-arresi-in-ponzi-schemell 055500 South Florida lawyer Scott Rothstein faces arrest in Ponzi scheme http://wevexamixtbay.comMews/politics/stataoundup/south-florida-lawycrscott-rothstein-faces-arrest-in-ponzi-scheme/I055500; Scott Rothstein Charged with Racketeering https://eww.cbsnews.comfnees/scottrothstein-charged-with-racketeerinW + +7Foul schemer Scott Rothstein lied to feds and should save 50-year prison tam, prosecutors say httpliwww.sun-sentinel.com/localibrov.ard/flrcg-scott-rothstein-no-sattence-redunion-20170926-raory.Mml + +Rothstein Sentenced to 50 Years Behind Bars http://www.nbcmiami.comMewsflocal/Rothstein-Sentenced-9595 I 004.html + +Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein lied to feds and should save 50-year prison tam, prosecutors say http•//www.sun-sentinel.corn/IocaVbrowaMMreg-scott-iothstein-no-scntence-reduclion-2Ol70926-siory.html + +principles of web data collection, web analytics, web search, search engines, websites, web traffic analysis, and related market analysis. + +13. The materials that I considered in preparing this report are listed in **Appendix C.** + +#### **IV. SUMMARY OF OPINIONS** + +14. Based on my research and analysis in connection with this assignment, which is described in more detail in the body of this report, along with my own experience, training, knowledge, and education as stated, I have reached the following opinion: + +15. *(The defaming statements associating Mr. [REDACTED] J. Edwards with the illegal activities of Mr. Scott Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit against Mr. Edwards have been disseminated to at least 74 online media or other sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669,542 potential daily visitors since the lawsuit was filed to the date that I filed this report, inclusive)* + +16. This number is conservative, and it is more likely than not, that the defaming statements have received wider dissemination due to factors, discussed in more detail later in this report, such as: + +a. It is a reasonable assumption that I have not located all references to the defaming statements on every website by the time of the submission of this report. So, there may be more sites with articles containing the defaming statements that are **not** included in my calculations. + +b. The focus of my analysis was the online dissemination of the statements. Therefore, I examined only online sources and **not** the dissemination of the statements made via print or broadcast media. It is reasonable to assume that the statements made were disseminated via these other channels. + +c. I have not included dissemination of the defaming statements in the book, Filthy Rich10 by authors James Patterson and John Connolly. Therefore, this source of dissemination is not included in my analysis. + +d. In my analysis, I have not attempted to measure face-to-face dissemination of articles containing the defaming statements. Therefore, these sources of disseminafon are not included in the count of daily unique visitors. + +e. Since I do not have aerecc to certain online sources C e ; ft'cies containing the defaming statements may have been disseminated (e. sages, personal social media messages, articles behind firewalls, etc.), these so t included in the count of daily unique visitors. + +f. Given the nature of the Web, e ossibly sites that have hosted the defaming statements that I could not locate or statements have been removed. Therefore, these sources of disseminatio no eluded in the count. + +g. Also, there s osted the articles containing the defaming statements where the visitor da is n t accessible or where I could not confirm the number of visitors. In these cases, e gh I had confirmed the site had posted one or more articles containing the de~ng sta ments, I did not include these sites in my calculation of the unique daily visitorsO + +I did not consider the dissemination via social media platforms of articles containing the defaming statements. Therefore, these sources of dissemination are not included in the count of daily unique visitors. + +10 James Patterson and John Connolly (2016) Can 13uv - The Shocking 'frue Story of Jeffrey Epstein. little, ttleand Company. + +i. There were many sites that published multiple articles on multiple days that contained or referenced the defaming statements; however, I did not use these multiple articles from the same site with different publication dates in my calculations in determining the number of daily unique visitors who have been exposed to the articles containing the defaming statements. + +j. I did not include unique daily visitors to articles that link t article to one or more of the articles containing the defaming statements; unless t13a t ireetly referenced the defaming statements, I did not include it in my analys + +k. I did not include the number of indivi hoer reading the articles shared the articles or contents contained within those artt ', ers, which would include multiple individuals reading the same article at or a t Ss, t t s e time at the same computer as well as all individuals who learned of the con s t e th icles from others who had read the articles. + +1. Finally, I did49Pi tie the counts of those who may have been searching and saw the defaming statement in the search results listing. + +### V. BACKGROUN ANALYTICS FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS + +17. of forming this opinion, I implemented numerous web analytics and related tech commonly used in the industry. In order to more clearly discuss these tech& fine the following terms: + +- Direct Traffic: visitors to a website that come from entering a website link into a browser location bar (e.g., not coming via a link on another website). +- Dissemination: the act of spreading or the circulation of information or articles. + +- Domain: a specific Internet website that are administered as a unit and defined by an Internet Protocol (IP) address. +- Reach: the percentage or number of people who visit a website out of the total targeted population. +- search engines. +- Referral Traffic: visitors to a site that come from wcbsitcs, other than Re eat Visits: visitor traffic to a website in a given Ag t just includes multiple visits from the same set of IP addresses (i.e., IP addr withlltofe than one visit); provides a count of the people who have visited a site mo V once in a given period. An rip% individual is usually defined by a combination of IP add a ser within a given period but can also be defined by more sophisticated methods +- Search Enaine: a pr associated hardware and processes that allows people to find information on cally via the submission of queries consisting of terms. +- Search Traffii: visitors to a site that come from search engines rather than from other websites or via',trect navigation. +- earch: a submission of a query to a search engine, usually in the form of terms fo ,.. "n 6. qu ry. +- Share: sharing of an article or webpage typically via some social media platform. + - Social Media: content that is shared via a social networking website. + +- Unique Visits: visitor traffic to a website within a given period that includes only the fist visit (i.e., subsequent visits are ignored), which excludes repeat visits; provides a count of the individuals who have visited a site in a given period. + +- Unique Daily Visitors: visitor traffic to a website who visits a site at least once in a given 24-hour period. Each visitor, to the site, is counted once during the repo ing period, which means it excludes repeat visits; provides a count of the individuals who t ted a site on a given day. + +- Visits: a count of all the traffic to a website in a od, including both unique and repeat visits. + +- Web Analvties: the mcasuremettXc9llt 6n, analysis, and reporting of web data. + +18. In forming my opinion, tit accepted web analytics and related methodologies. To that end, I employed us p licly available online analytic services, as well as subscription-based services in gd~i~tip my research, including: + +- Alexa: a nli e service that provides web traffic data and analysis. +- G Keyword Tool: an online service that provides the number of searches for a giv t o ywords in a given month on the Google search engine. + +oogle Trends: an online service that shows how often a particular term is relatively, on the Google search engine in a given period. + +> Quantcast: an online service that provides web traffic data and analysis. SimilarWeb: an online service that provides web traffic data and analysis. + +19. These tools offer a variety of data and analysis services, and they are frequently utilized by industry professionals in the search engine optimization, web analytics, and search engine marketing for the market, customer, and competitive analysis. Furthermore, where possible, I did my own assessments, as outlined below, in order to validate the data and analysis results. + +20. I also utilized search engines, primarily Google and Bing, to assess the dissemination of articles containing the statements. + +21. When necessary, I used multiple data sources, which is a data verificat on technique known as triangulation", where one uses multiple and disparate sourceSlbNlnalysis and then compare the results from the separate analysis. If the results are I • , inforccs the conclusion that the overall data analysis is valid. + +22. In situations where I believed that I could not ad tel rify the number of individuals or did not have confidence in the numbers in sN,a£ons, I did not include those numbers in the calculation. + +23. Concerning the accuracy of the ( c ith11s~i " e number of domains where the statements have been disseminated is re ' e, as is is straightforward to verify (i.e., the article is either posted on a site or it is no isle either contains the defaming statements or no). If anything, this is an undercou e domains, for example, may have removed such articles, making them no vailable. There are possibly articles containing the defaming statements that I able to locate by the time that I submitted this report. + +24. Co erning traffic numbers for domains, the traffic services I used are the de facto ind Y dard, with billions of dollars in online advertising spend being based on these and related numbers12. Therefore, I consider them reliable for the purpose employed here. + +&#x27;ITriangulation (social science) hlip://en.wikipalia.org/wikiffriangulation\_%28social\_sciencen29 + +1&#x27; U.S. Digital Advertising Will Make S83 Billion This Year, Says EMarketer linp://www.adweek.com/digital/u-s-digital-advertising-will-make-63-billion .this-year-says-emarkeler/

25. My analysis is based on my experience, training, knowledge, and education and is formed through the application of that experience, training, knowledge, and education in the principles of web data collection, web analytics, web search, search engines, websites, and related areas.

VI. METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE THE DISSEMINATION OF THE DEFAMING STATEMENTS AGAINST MR.

26. My opinion is that articles containing the defaming statem n disseminated to at least 74 online media or other sites in 104 separate C o Cart i ides with a combined 9,669,542 potential daily visitors.

27. This is a conservative estimate, and it ism' an not, the statements have received wider dissemination due to factors outlin •VSioe fr

28. Concerning the procedure emp k lifc• termining the dissemination of the statements, nearly every major news si t I in stigated has carried some aspects of the overall case relating to Mr. Epstein, or other parties involved. In fact, there are hundreds of news articles and concerning the general story from news outlets worldwide, with combin tial viewership in the multi-millions.

29. H ver, I not interested in articles that just discussed the story in general or other aspects story. I was specifically interested in only those articles that referenced directl ming statements. Naturally, this narrow focus is a much smaller subset of news articles and other articles than are the articles addressing the overall story.

30. To isolate these articles of interest, I generated a series of queries's that specifically targeted news articles from the case that addressed the defaming statements (e.g., Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and lawsuit) to retrieve a set of articles that directly related to the defaming statements14. I employed a modified snowball technique's, starting with one seed query, adding and modifying terms until I was not retrieving new results. I also located some articles via navigating from the set of retrieved articles.

31. An example of a search engine results page in response to op e queries is shown in Figure I.

32. Figure 1: Google search results for the search edwards epstein Ponzi scheme.

13epstein. ein POIal scheme. brad Pond. brad lawyer Pond. brad dirty lawyer. fl ay Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. lawsuit, Epstein Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long us Justices Say h's OK Just an 'Ordinary Guy,' Lawyer Dishes on Surviving Rothstein, Battling Epstein.

&quot;In addition to the queries. I located some ankles via direction navigation.

&quot; https://en.wikipediaorg/wikirSnowball\_sampling

33. I then personally verified that each article contained the defaming statements, by reviewing each article used in my analysis to ensure that the articles directly referenced in some way the defaming statements.

34. So, articles relating to the overall story that did not mention the defaming statements were not included in the analysis.

35. In the end, 1 had a set of 104 online news articles or stories to the date that I filed this report that specifically referenced the defaming statements to conduct my analysis, as outlined below. These articles are listed in Appendix D.

36. Each of these 104 online articles was posted online. The 104 online articles were distributed among 74 unique domain websites (i.e., some websites posted multiple articles that contain the statements). These 74 domains are also listed in Appendix D with th articles links.

37. As seen from the list of domains that have published cOories containing references to the statement, many of these domains are those o ; 'or organizations or sources, including BuzzFeed, Forbes, New York Daily N P ix, Radar Online, The Daily Mail, The Telegraph, etc.

38. There are regional Florida new itlls , ere Mr. IIM' law office is located, that published articles containing the dung s ements, including The Palm Beach Daily News and The Palm Beach Post.

39. I then used a v ty o dreb analytics traffic services and other sources to get the unique daily visitor traffi rch of these domains. 1 used multiple services when necessary to get the unique da isitor raffic for each of these domains, as these traffic services may use different to iqu to arrive at their traffic numbers. In cnd, I used primarily SimilarWeb, as the servic erally providing the most consistent results across websites.

40. In cases where I determined I could not get unique daily visitor traffic numbers or the unique daily visitor traffic was not reliable, in my opinion, I did not include the unique daily visitor traffic numbers for that domain in the numbers. This usually occurred for the sites with a smaller number of daily visitors or sites with an extremely large number of daily visitors.

41. Unique daily visitors measure is an industry standard web analytics metric for measuring people that visit a website in a given day, also known as unique audience. It is generally averaged out over multiple days with a given period, such as week or month, as there are normal daily fluctuations.

42. Table 1 shows the unique daily visitor traffic for the listed domains than posted articles or stories referencing the statements and the associated unique daily visi c for each of those domains, along with the number of articles containing the de t tements posted on that site.

43. Table I: Domains that published articles or • c aining the defaming statements with the domain's number of unique daily o d the number of articles contai ling the statements published on that dom 1iltS h , ate that I filed this report.

No. 1 2Domain 15thcircuit.co.palm-beach. J. aangirfan.blogspot.qa( sHNY Domain Unique Visitor Traffic (Daily) a aNumber of Articles Published I I
3able2know.org189801
4abovethelaw.co b510002
5absolutewrite.com373331
6amlawdail epa om ica1
7anonh .c m
186891
8archi
.ob1
9u sentinel.com149791
10oogle.com.qabI
11c nfire.blogspot.gaa1
12casetext.com20947
13deeppoliticsforum.coma1
14doc la er.net424001
15docuri.com60241
16forum.davidicke.com116071
17fullcontentdaily.coma

sNielsen Online Ratings Metrics Guidelines, Mtp://digitalmeasuremeninielsen.cornifiles/metrics-guidelines.pdi

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DomainDomain Unique Visitor Traffic (Daily)Number of Articles Published
18girlsjustwannahaveguns.com84611
19jjr.com635001
20jonathanturley.org118271
21law.justia.com925671
22lawnewz.com1148001
23mondoweiss.net139491
24nesaranews.blogspot.qa62271
25novaordemnews.blogspot.qaa1
26pagesix.com556001
27peuplesobservateursblog.wordpress.coma1
28radaronline.com3033671
29seeker401.wordpress.coma1
30sites.eveyo.com216271
31static1.squarespace.comb1
32tabublog.coma2
33theawarenesscenter.blogspot.qaa1
34thegoldwater.com212391
35themillenniumreport.com86401
36www.4dca.orga2
37www.abajournal.com177821
38www.alecomm.coma1
39www.browardpalmbeach.com174311
40www.buzzfeed.com7173501
41www.courthousenews.com87851
42www.dailybusinessreview.coma1
43www.dailymail.co.uk12454773
44www.democraticunderground.com1144671
45www.documentcloud.org383671
46www.facebook.comb1
47www.fairfaxunderground.com98601
48www.floppingaces.neta1
49www.floridabulldog.orga2
50www.forbes.com39426002
51www.freerepublic.com1814671
52www.garyeto.coma1
53www.gossipextra.com416473
54www.gpo.gov586671
55www.ieyenews.coma1
56www.justice-integrity.orga3
No.DomainDomain Unique Visitor Traffic (Daily)Number of Articles Published
57www.law.com340001
58www.law360.com463331
59www.librarything.com1053331
60www.nydailynews.com17853332
61www.pacificpundit.com63991
62www.palmbeachdailynews.com8 I7
63www.palmbeachpost.comy. 03
64www.pressreader.comb5
65www.reddit.comb1
66www.rigorousintuition.caa1
67www.scribd.comb3
68www.slideshare.netb1
69www.sott.netIIlk1123331
70wvvw.talkleft.com'V3
71www.telegraph.co.uk'
t('
48282
72www.the5thestate.asia\ vaI
73www.veteranstoday.com460001
74www. m • u.com'b2
9,669,542104

a - Unique daily visitor traffic not available

b - Unique daily visitor traffic not verifiabl

44. As shown in Ta are 74 domains that hosted 104 articles containing the defaming statements aga t Mr. Edwards with these defaming statements begin disseminated to, conservatively, a tial 69542 daily visitors to these websites.

45. ch domain's unique daily visitor count to calculate the dissemination of the arti mg the statements to various websites and potentially to visitors to that site (i.e., as vis rs to the news sitcs, these individuals could have been exposed to the articles containing the statements), using the unique daily visitor number only once for each domain, regardless whether that domain published more than one article referring to the statements.

VII. RESULTS FOR ANALYSIS OF THE DISSEMINATION OF THE DEFAMING STATEMENTS AGAINST MR.

46. Based on my analysis as outlined above, my opinion is that the defaming statements associating Mr. [REDACTED] with the illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein as a result of Mr. Epstein's lawsuit against Mr. [REDACTED] have been disseminated to at least 74 online media or other sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669,542 potential daily visitors since the lawsuit was filed to the date that I filed this report, inclusive.

47. This is a conservative number, and more likely than not, articles containing the defaming statements made have been disseminated to more individuals.

VIII. WHY THE NUMBER IS CONSERVATIVE

48. This is a conservative number, and it is more likely than not, the defaming statements have received wider dissemination due to factors such as:

a. Although I spent considerable effort to locate published articles that contained the defaming statements, it is reasonable to assume that I have not located all such articles by the time of the submission of this report. So, there are most likely more sites with articles containing the defaming statements that are not included in my calculations, which would increase the dissemination of the articles on domains and increase the traffic count.

b. The focus of my analysis was the dissemination of online articles containing the defaming statements, and I examined only online sources and not print or broadcast media.

c. I have not included dissemination of the defaming statements in the book, Filthy Rich17 by authors James Patterson and John Connolly. As Mr. Patterson is a well-known author, the book had an initial printing of 500,00018, is well ranked in Amazon's electronic book

17 James Patterson and John Connolly (2016) Filthy Rich: A Powerful Billionaire, the Sex Scandal that Undid Him, and All the Justice that Money Can Buy - The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein. Little, [REDACTED] and Company.

18 FILTHY RICH - PATTERSON, JAMES/ CONNOLLY, JOHN (CON)/ MALLOY, TIMOTHY (CON) - NE
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/FILTHY-RICH-PATTERSON-JAMES-CONNOLLY-JOHN-CON-MALLOY-TIMOTHY-CON-NE/192248712306?\_trkparms

and other sections19, and also, a top USA Today top selling book20. The book is available and/or has been reviewed on at least 20 websites, including USA Today, New York Journal of Books, The Daily Beast, and the New York Post, and is available from major online retailers, including Amazon, Wal-mart, Barnes and Noble, and eBay, among others, as shown in Appendix E. This source of dissemination is not included in my calculation.

d. In my analysis, I did not attempt to measure face-to-face di ation that may have occurred after individuals may have read articles containin ing statements, which would increase the count. Therefore, this is not in y calculations.

e. Naturally, I could not access certain onl. where the defaming statements made may have been disseminated (e.g., emai t , social media messages, U" articles behind firewalls, etc.). Therefore, these nu t included in my calculations.

f. Also, there are possibly 'S have hosted articles containing the defaming statements where the articles c .....e be moved. Therefore, they are not included in my calculations.

For sites erq dne or more of the articles containing the defaming statements are posted but I could not locate or not determine reliable daily unique visitor traffic, I have no luded ese sites in my calculations.

did not include the dissemination of the articles containing the defaming statem tly to social media platforms.

&quot;Filthy Rich: A Powerful Billionaire, the Sex Scandal that Undid Him, and All the Justice that Money Can Buy: The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein bups://www.amvon.coni/dp/BOIEFL9BMC/refdp•kindle-mdireeff\_encodinrUfF8&bila—1

&quot;Patterson takes on sordid Jeffrey Epstein case in 'Filthy Rich' hupsliwww.usatoday.comistoryi-Jfilthy•sich•jeffrey• epstein...patterson..J9l 605266/

i. I did not include articles that link to one of the articles containing the statements in my calculations of dissemination. Unless the article directly mentioned the statements, I did not include that article in my calculations.

J. Many sites published multiple articles on multiple days that quoted or referenced the statements; however, I did not use these multiple publication dates fro the same site in my calculations of unique visitor traffic. If a domain published only one ntaining the statements, then I directly used the unique daily visitors number. If a d dished multiple articles concerning the statements, I did not count the traffic or sequent articles containing the statements made, even though research shows ffic to websites is generally only about 30%21, meaning that 70% of the tra unique. However, I was not comfortable using this figure given the nature "Ss ., c it which might have higher repeat visitors day-to-day. Therefore, I did not inclu f irs to multiple articles in my calculations.

k. Finally, I di t o \* ' de the count of people who may have been searching and may have seen t stat ents made in the search results, without needing to visit the actual articles, which icily happen, as shown in Figure 2.

I. Figu e 2: Example of search results with the defaming statements appearing i u t snippets, requiring no need to visit the website hosting the articles the

n Tetuan, J., Adar, IS., R. and Potts, M. (2006). History repeals itself: repeal queries in Yahoo's logs. In Proceedings oldie 29th annual international ACAI SIGN conference on Research and development in information removal (SIGIR '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 703-704.

All News Images Videos More Setdngs Tools

About 290.000 results (0.57 seconds)

Jeffrey Epstein paid S5.5M to settle lawsuits I Page Six

https://pagesix.com/2017/101041jeffrey-epstein-paid-5-5m-to-settle4awsuits/ •

Oct 4. 2017 - Rothstein is servings 50-year sentence for running a 51.2 billion Panc.cherr e. Epstein had sued the Florida attorneys, claiming

C ti) Jeffrey Epstein paid 3 women 55.5 million to end sex lawsuits

www.palmbeachpostsominews/crime.../epstein../BGEJkara2X4ffig4HAqyJr •

Oct 3. 2017 - Pan Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein paid 52.5 million, 52 million 8 51 ... that had nothing to do with Rothstein's Ponzl scheme....

PALM BEACH PERV Jeffrey Epstein Paid Victims MILLIONS!

vAvw.gossipextra.com/2017/10/04/jeffrey-epstein-paidtwillions-79822 •

Oct 4.2017 - Epstein has sued both lawyers, alleging that Invented the sex-slave narrative to perpetuate the Ponzl scheme overseen by Rothstein.

Newest lawsuit against Epstein expected to include victim...

wampalmbeachdailynews.cominewsilocalt..epstein.../CZ14s0ESb0Q4nb7njcl hiJ

Oct 20. 2013 - One or more Weems of Palm Beecher Jeffrey Epstein are expected to testify ... criminal Issues; Ponzl•scheme ategations surrounding

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein shells out more money in latest sex abuse ...

www.nydailynews.comf.../billionairejeffretepstei oney-latest-sex-abuse4a... •

Dec 19, 2009- Epstein has fled a suit charging that took part In a Ponzl scheme In which his former law partner. Scott Rothstein. gaffed Investors by ...

ne-:— I —.non

XI SUMMARY OF OPINION

19. The defaming statements concerning Mr. have been disseminated to at least 74 online media or other sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669,542 individual unique visitors to the date that I filed this report, inclusive. More likely than not, this is a conservative estimate.

50. Right to Amend: Although I have had access to materials publicly available pertaining to claims in this dispute, I have not been able to review all the material by the deadline for completion of this report. I reserve the right to review and rely on any such material, including at the time of trial. I also reserve the right to issue a supplemental or an amended report if my review of such material results in any significant change or addition to my opinion.

c oS

DATED: 20 October 2017

Respectfully submitted,

Dr. Bernard J. Jansen
Adjunct Professor
College of Information Sciences and Technology
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA, 16802
Phone: 434-249-8687
Email: jjansen@acm.org
URL: http://www.bernardjjansen.com/

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/EFTA02763669.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/EFTA02763669.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75da4d76f43ef356f5ac8901b4179cb0fc0ad722 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/EFTA02763669.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,5504 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 107, + "chars": 208294, + "elapsed_seconds": 142.84, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_32_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_36_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_96_Figure_146.jpeg", + "_page_104_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_104_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_104_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/C \nEXPERT WITNESS, DR. BERNARD JAN \n'C l49\nEY EPSTEIN'S \n-PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES \nD TO EXCLUDE HIS TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 333.361572265625 + ], + [ + 534.76416015625, + 333.361572265625 + ], + [ + 534.76416015625, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Edtv \n\u2022 4 ( SIM A piing to Recover Damages Based on a Defamation Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 500.9262390136719 + ], + [ + 470.3560485839844, + 500.9262390136719 + ], + [ + 470.3560485839844, + 554.9320831298828 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 554.9320831298828 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 355.7669677734375, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 355.7669677734375, + 518.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 518.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"WEAK\" - An Opinion or a Verifiable Statement of Fact?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 392.3870849609375, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 392.3870849609375, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Expert has no Opinion on Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 333.256103515625, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 333.256103515625, + 224.362548828125 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 224.362548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "No Testimony Related to A ges", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 312.416259765625, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 312.416259765625, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Expert Testimony Unnecessary for Nominal Damages and Subject to 90.403 Balancing", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.73974609375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.73974609375, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "' Admissions of No Reputational Damage", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 353.6544189453125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 353.6544189453125, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Dr. Jansen Does Not Me ction 90.702", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 313.17376708984375, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 313.17376708984375, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECORD FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.8856506347656, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.8856506347656, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.484, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 268.00390625, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 268.00390625, + 174.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 174.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPLICABLE LAW Ari N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 396.6688232421875, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 396.6688232421875, + 305.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 305.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Litigation Privilege Precludes a Defamation Actio Aulinst Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 455.93341064453125, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 455.93341064453125, + 333.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 333.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IL g\" \"Original Proceedin\nPicked Allegations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 540.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 540.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I l I. Da maues in a Civil Malicious Prosecution Actio are Nut Presumed", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 454.7620849609375, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 454.7620849609375, + 334.6125183105469 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 334.6125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Dr. Jansen Failed to Provide Any Opinion on Actual Damaees in a Malicious \nProsecution Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 508.375, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 508.375, + 624.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 624.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Dr.Jansen's Testimony Fails to Assist t\nFact \u2014 if Allowed to Consider - \nNominal Dwnages in a Malicious Pr s on Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 529.38, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 529.38, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. Section 90.702, Florida Statutes Governs Expert Witness Testimony and Dr. Jansen \nFails to Meet the Threshold Requirement of Assisting the Trier of Fact or \nDetermining a Fact in Issue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.9712524414062, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.9712524414062, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "s\n4 RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 399.6434326171875 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 399.6434326171875 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 478.23779296875 + ], + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 478.23779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.448, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 308.448, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.64, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 380.664, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 380.664, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 287.64, + 159.57000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWERS TO PLAIN ' \nTHIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TOSS Ala", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 132.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 132.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 164.5625, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 164.5625, + 437.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 437.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 167.09649658203125, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 167.09649658203125, + 324.2319641113281 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 324.2319641113281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 613.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 613.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 627.9919738769531 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 627.9919738769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 331.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 331.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 167.01499938964844, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 167.01499938964844, + 511.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 511.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 648.8100000000001 + ], + [ + 166.26499938964844, + 648.8100000000001 + ], + [ + 166.26499938964844, + 663.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 663.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 166.81112670898438, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 166.81112670898438, + 256.7393798828125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 256.7393798828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 165.32130432128906, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 165.32130432128906, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 505.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 505.43999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 602.64 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 602.64 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 616.41 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 616.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 145.7750244140625 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 145.7750244140625 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 159.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 159.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 297.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 463.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 603.45 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 603.45 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 616.41 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 616.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 158.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 324.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 532.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 532.1700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 174.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 174.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 506.35247802734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 506.35247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 672.8525085449219 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 672.8525085449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.44000244140625, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 156.09246826171875 + ], + [ + 104.44000244140625, + 156.09246826171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.69000244140625, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 253.59246826171875 + ], + [ + 103.69000244140625, + 253.59246826171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 474.09246826171875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 474.09246826171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.36800000000001, + 584.8199999999999 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 584.8199999999999 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 599.7225036621094 + ], + [ + 100.36800000000001, + 599.7225036621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 131.905029296875 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 131.905029296875 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 145.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 145.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 243.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 243.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "0 ANSWER: \\->", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 13.279999732971191, + 387.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 320.7855529785156, + 387.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 320.7855529785156, + 421.328125 + ], + [ + 13.279999732971191, + 421.328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 589.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 589.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 167.37095642089844, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 167.37095642089844, + 187.10302734375 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 187.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 297.7229919433594 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 297.7229919433594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.08000183105469, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 518.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 81.08000183105469, + 518.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 169.6687469482422, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 169.6687469482422, + 188.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 188.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 369.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 369.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 507.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 507.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO114ERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 476.0018310546875, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 476.0018310546875, + 338.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 338.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 295.596, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 295.596, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 91.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN Taken on Behalf of the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.29599999999999, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 309.672, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 309.672, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 127.29599999999999, + 230.03999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.676, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 242.964, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 242.964, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 417.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 205.74 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 205.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 206.96163940429688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 206.96163940429688, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. QUALIFICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 217.41445922851562, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 217.41445922851562, + 250.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 250.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. ASSIGNMENT IATERIALS CONSIDERED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.3353576660156, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.3353576660156, + 501.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 501.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. SUMMARY OF OPINIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 168.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "V. BACKGROUN ANALYTICS FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 452.41925048828125, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 452.41925048828125, + 500.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 500.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VI. METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE THE DISSEMINATION OF THE \nDEFAMING STATEMENTS AGAINST MR.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 542.7210693359375, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 542.7210693359375, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VII. RESULTS FOR ANALYSIS OF THE DISSEMINATION OF THE DEFAMING \nSTATEMENTS AGAINST MR.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 525.3973388671875, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 525.3973388671875, + 712.1030197143555 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 712.1030197143555 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIII. WHY THE NUMBER IS CONSERVATIVE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 278.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "XI SUMMARY OF OPINION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 249.74603271484375, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 249.74603271484375, + 570.0856323242188 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 570.0856323242188 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 250 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 109 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 283 + ], + [ + "Line", + 117 + ], + [ + "Text", + 71 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 281 + ], + [ + "Line", + 127 + ], + [ + "Text", + 103 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 263 + ], + [ + "Line", + 111 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 233 + ], + [ + "Line", + 102 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 251 + ], + [ + "Line", + 114 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 96 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 264 + ], + [ + "Line", + 123 + ], + [ + "Text", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 247 + ], + [ + "Line", + 106 + ], + [ + "Text", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 230 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "Text", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 257 + ], + [ + "Line", + 114 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 198 + ], + [ + "Text", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 289 + ], + [ + "Line", + 126 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 261 + ], + [ + "Line", + 117 + ], + [ + "Text", + 84 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 216 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 260 + ], + [ + "Line", + 114 + ], + [ + "Text", + 104 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 256 + ], + [ + "Line", + 114 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 266 + ], + [ + "Line", + 126 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 336 + ], + [ + "Line", + 161 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 114 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 347 + ], + [ + "Line", + 161 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 310 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Figure", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763669" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c11551e9da175c93a6a921ac1bfb75c89b4cb07 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08c4380e622f2429dd5e6136869734c8c4e1dae8114a6260be1a1d2c45ac3f5d +size 7166 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80450d2d38558d1ed30b04b7a9f011845731cdb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:53a7107037ad6684285aacb1ca2554d39ab6384948b6e699be5765d98f5733fb +size 916 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed9c9af213bee914a5cc4f011d37c05a6e7a3eaf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_104_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca0cb065f9c29e81db5e3bf1f924007574b6cf939a2c376408f09fc288c5e436 +size 960 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_32_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_32_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3edcb278fb4856dc974510fe2aa12d3a50c1a4bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_32_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bc9d28cfb46c576b4ce6e24007f6cfb579e9e53d4f03b86517e01c872da51de4 +size 15192 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_36_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_36_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d50ac3454bdbaaf573892aa61f849bf4b8c0db9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_36_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:375ed1f5685b0bb480d5105550b3ea4524c4401e0603c557a95aca7aa2cb87f5 +size 15022 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_96_Figure_146.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_96_Figure_146.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c170662be552f4151a2ac20733bce357ac70f2be --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763669/_page_96_Figure_146.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8803fe6ec53bd87710664eb1626677dc348ef78e02f844b9742e825c98f9e36c +size 165423 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18b28306738867bea15bfc1169d98536670f726e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.md @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)COOMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +VS. + +J. + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO + +4\ TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersign attorneys will take the Duces Tecum video deposition of: + +# NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME LOCATION + +C. Culver = III January 24, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +\*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +### SCHEDULE "A" DUCES TECUM + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition DT + +In compliance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(4) (1997) and the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Elkins v. Syken 672 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1966), we request that you bring with you to your deposition the following items if they exist: + +- 1. Any and all data, documents, papers, photographs, filing, video tapes, memoranda or other writings prepared by you pursuant to your employment in this case. + - 2. All photographs viewed and/or taken by or for you in connectio A64. 't11\*s case. +- 3. Copies of all statements, written or recorded, which connection with this case. examined in +- 4. All published professional standards or guidelines us ca) referred to by you in formulating your opinion in connection with this case. 5 All professional literature, treatises, to;tlfQg2s pTother publications which you regard as authoritative in connection with this case. +- 6. Copies of all published articles three (3) years, or drafts of speeches given b opinion in this case. or contributed to by you within the past the past three (3) years, which affect your +- 7. Copies of any publi al Jes written by others on which you have relied that affect your opinion in this case. +- 8. Copies of any tr its of testimony, if available, given in other cases in which you have testified (either deposition or trial) in the past two years. +- 9. attorney. Copes of any reports prepared by you and furnished to the defendant or his +- 10. O y 'dr rawings, graphs, charts, illustrations or plans prepared by you in connection with this.ma r. +- 11. Copies of any and all notes, calculations or other data prepared by you in formulating your opinion in connection with this case. +- 12. Any professional publications, treatises, textbooks or other publications which you have examined in formulating your opinion in connection with this case. +- 13. Office records indicating time spent on your undertaking and hourly charges therefore in connection with this case. + +- 14. Reports of any other experts which you have read. +- 15. Any published monograms, treatises, manuals, textbooks or other documents used as a reference by you in connection with this case. +- 16. Copies of any correspondence between you or your office and 1 for the defendants, including but not limited to written letters, a hard copy of d I e-mail communication by and among you and counsel for Defendant and an b the counsel's representatives including secretaries, paralegals and legal assistants, as we i h d copy of any e-mail communication between you and any other health care professional ding this matter. +- 17. Copies of any correspondence written by you or received from others with whom you have consulted in connection with this case, including but not limited to a hard copy of any and all e-mail communications. +- 18. Any memoranda reviewed which the--attorney/engaging you, an investigator, a paralegal, or an adjuster in connection with this case prepared. +- 19. Any other document or writing of any kind or description which you have viewed in formulating your conclusion in cone c whk.this case. +- 20. Any and all charts, diaitrt yoverlays, graphs, photographic enlargements or other demonstrative aids prepared or to be used by you at trial or in aid of your opinions and/or testimony. + - 21. A copy of your current curriculum vitae. +- 22. An \*proximation of the portion of your professional time and/or work devoted to service as an expert for defendant during the past three years. This estimate should be based on +- (1) hours expended, (2) income earned, or (3) the approximate number of examinations performed annually. 23\ All lists of cases in which you have testified as an expert at trial or in deposition which you compiled pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, any similar state rule, or any court order. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition DT + +AND any and all materials that you have reviewed in preparation for your testimony. + +upon oral examination before Palm Beach Reporting, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for uses at trial, or for such other purposes as are perraed under the OIS applicable Statutes or Rules. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-i Cts \*dal copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-recordsy di gs, and/or any other data KV\ compilations from which information can be obtained ed, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection d cescutto reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as lication metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your informatio ology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to ne fork drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phon et with ir data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools p\d prot Is. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition DT + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of JANUARY, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting, Inc. (court reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition DT + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw [REDACTED] +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] Edwards + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition DT + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +A g + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun acomodamiento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada pan su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de Itvoz, flame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasfon4ou1v ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou park nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w parlt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale < claire ele 74." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6d6855f5820c5ea8841e0dc355260179e8781ce --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776/EFTA02763776.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,442 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763776.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 9819, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 424.116, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 424.116, + 331.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 184.82399999999998, + 331.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.4468078613281, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.4468078613281, + 459.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 459.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 457.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 388.62, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 388.62, + 457.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\" \nDUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 351.81866455078125, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 351.81866455078125, + 650.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 650.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 133.65 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763776" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39cea70d2ea320ce13f87e983c7e9263d94b73a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pm.1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A + +("1"p + +N + +## OF CANCELLATION F H + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersi celled the below hearing as follows: + +DATE: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 TIME: 8:45 A.M. JUDGE: Judge David F. PLACE: 205 N. Di ROOM: 9C y, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +SPECIFIC MATTER BE EARD: + +PLAINTIFF'S TO COMPEL FOLLOW SITION TO APPEAR FOR + +• • 7\ + +m rn. + +In acdtirdance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771 or (V) 1-800-955-8770- via Florida Relay + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this day of August, 2010 to : 10 + +at In Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterhury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Fla. Ba FO 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff an, Jr. 235954 BURNETT P.A. + +A Cots + +Insi) 9/10743kNOTIC606-Notice of CAncenatioo 8 10 2010 Heasing-RA(8/6/10•1223) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9682502e2e4bc2270f5470079d032449043ebdad --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784/EFTA02763784.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763784.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1845, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.246, + 79.968 + ], + [ + 545.7, + 79.968 + ], + [ + 545.7, + 123.353515625 + ], + [ + 297.246, + 123.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OF CANCELLATION F H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.97, + 304.04499999999996 + ], + [ + 434.634, + 304.04499999999996 + ], + [ + 434.634, + 319.47357177734375 + ], + [ + 182.97, + 319.47357177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.32999999999998, + 82.566 + ], + [ + 399.020263671875, + 82.566 + ], + [ + 399.020263671875, + 96.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 234.32999999999998, + 96.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763784" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fe460cd565e07ab00af40e060167d0a7c37ffaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.md @@ -0,0 +1,535 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF( EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AN N LIMINE OF UNRELATED SE TLEMENTS + +'\*" P c) on the• production and disclosure of any Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epsjn "Epstein"), moves for a protective order pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil additional confidential settlement a 90.104, Florida Statutes (2017) e from use at trial the confidential settlement agreements and amounts and for a such are inadmissible evidence, and states: and amounts and moves in limine pursuant to section + +### INTRODUCTION + +Deft ( Sonter-Plaintiff J. (e) represented three plaintiffs who brou claims seeking money damages against Epstein. possesses the confident! settlement agreements of his three clients (the "Three Tort Claimants") and improperly publicly disclosed the confidential amounts in Court filings in this lawsuit. has argued that Epstein's filing of the original civil proceeding against was motivated by a desire to silence these Three Tort Claimants and possibly others. Epstein denies this motivation + +and maintains his probable cause was grounded in media reports of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the realization of the possible connection for litigation behavior unrelated to the claims of his three clients. + +## Court's Ruling and Epstein's Compliance + +Epstein respects this Court's ruling as to the broad net of discovery. In this Court's Order rendered January 5, 2018 (D.E. 1136)1, Epstein was ordered (and will comply number of claims settled" by Epstein from December 6, 2007 to December lose "the d the "gross settlement amount." The same was ordered and will be produced for ecember 7, 2009 through the present. + +In his November 17, 2017, Revised Omnibus Mo Ct itin ine, Epstein asked the Court to exclude testimony or evidence that Epstein SS, r or subsequent claims, suits or settlements, including the amounts for plain 'b resented by and to exclude as trial evidence Exhibit No. 119 ' 1Se ment Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations." (D. 0 ections B.1 and E.) At the hearing preliminarily addressing the non-disclosed ibit, made an ore tenus motion to compel production of all other se t agreements. (12/5/17 Tr. 230:21-23.)2 + +This Co fe ruling on these issues and asked Epstein to separate the issues out and set his Motio a f-hour special set hearing. (12/5/17 Tr. 230:21-231:5; 235:5-9) (12/7/17 Tr. 14:12ah e Court recognized that the settlement agreements contained confidentiality provisions that would need to be addressed in Epstein's Motion. (12/7/17 Tr. 12:23-13:24.) In addition, while the Court ordered Epstein to disclose the total number of claims and the gross + +A copy of the Court's January 5, 2018, Order is attached as Exhibit A. + +2 Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit B. + +Excerpts of the December 7, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit C. + +aggregate settlement amount paid during the two-year period before December 7, 2009, and the period after December 7, 2009, it deferred ruling on the admissibility of those amounts and the confidential settlement agreements themselves until the issues had been fully briefed and heard. (12/7/17 Tr. 11:14-12:22.) (D.E. 1136.) The confidential settlement agreements and individual and aggregate settlement amounts have no relevance and, if any, their probative value is substantially outweighed by the prejudice to and privacy rights of the settling clai + +### Discovery of Individual Names and Amounts Not Reasonably CalcyM Lead to Discovery of Admissible Evidence + +Epstein seeks to protect from disclosure the confidentia ettl ment agreements of individuals who were not represented by The f agreements is substantially the same as the settlement a entered into by clients, t except for the individual names and amoun y I contain reciprocal confidentiality provisions. That provision in the Three ,s ClCI ,ants' settlement agreements provides, in pertinent part, that: ose confidential settlement + +> The parties agre a amount of this settlement shall be kept strictly confide shall not be disclosed at any time to any third party, excep , to the extent required by law or rule; (b) to the extent necessary in connection with medical treatment, legal, finan 'al, alouriting or tax services, or appropriate tax reporting p scs (o y if necessary); or (c) in response to a validly issued cp u oena from a governmental or regulatory agency. + +> > \*\*\* + +The Parties further agree that the Parties shall not provide any copy, in whole or in part, or in any form, of this Settlement Agreement to any third party, except to the extent required by law or rule or in response to a validly issued subpoena from a governmental or regulatory agency. Moreover, neither this Settlement Agreement, nor any copy hereof, nor the terms hereof shall be used or disclosed in any court, arbitration or other legal proceedings, except to enforce the provisions of this Settlement Agreement. + +To the extent a party is served with a Subpoena or otherwise compelled to disclose the settlement agreement or terms thereof, the other party must be given notice and time to commence the necessary proceedings to obtain a court order preventing, limiting or otherwise restricting such disclosure. In light of the confidentiality provision, even if this Court ordered Epstein to produce the settlement agreements, individual settlement amounts or individual settlement tegns relating to tort claimants who were not represented by would be required to give each Tort Claimant notice which could proceedings (before the courts that have jurisdiction over each specifi ("Any Other Tort Clai Epstein t further court agreement). Not only is this a waste of time and judicial resources, but it could inconsistent rulings. + +In any event, any additional disclosure sought by ould only serve to expose the names of the claimants. Epstein seeks this Court' Srfrc e order for those names and the individual amounts paid to each because thi lhicic , 'on is not reasonably, or even remotely, calculated to lead the discovery of admi e s ev nce. The names of individuals not represented by and the individual am ted to each of those individual's settlement is solely being sought to unfairly prejudi 1F l n and to make public the names of the women who deserve and settled with confiden nymity. + +# No Relev and rejudice Far Outweighs Any Probative Value + +As fo adm \*bility, the net narrows and Epstein moves this Court for an order prohibiting the re y argument or testimony and the admission into evidence of the settlement agreements and specific amounts paid in each settlement. + +How can introducing the individual settlement agreements (which are hearsay) and individual settlement amounts help the jury determine a fact in issue? + +The Court has already determined that, while the parties may generally speak about the number of claims in terms of volume that Epstein was facing at the time he initiated and continued this proceeding, the details, the merits and what may have been discovered in cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted by would not be individually admissible into evidence. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:25-5:24.) Going further, Epstein asks the Court to find that disclosing the general number of settled claims and the aggregate settlement amounts does not provi robative value but, rather would be unduly prejudicial to Epstein and would tend to r confuse the jury because the information would be provided with no context to a \*ng details of the claims of plaintiffs not represented by and Epstein's d ose claims. + +Because Any Other Tort Claimants who were no r ed by , and who are S t nonparties to this action, deserve personal privac i r tdV, they contractually negotiated as in those very settlement docum N Y7 er compelling disclosure of this private information would run afoul of the settl nt a ment, the Florida Constitution, and Florida's discovery rules. The order wou be reversible on appeal in an extraordinary writ because "the disclosure of pers al fl ncial information may cause irreparable harm to a person forced to disclose it, in a which the information is not relevant "Straub v. Matte, 805 So. + +### ARGUMENT + +### A. Epstein Seeks an Order Protecting from Disclosure the Names and Amounts of Any Other Settling Tort Claimants and Production of Confidential Settlement Agreements Based on the Florida Constitution and Florida Discovery Rules + +This request for protection from disclosure pertains to Any Other Tort Claimants — other than the Three Tort Claimants represented. + +Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, upon motion by a party, and for good cause shown, this Court may make any order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense that justice requires, including one or more of the following: (1) that the discovery not be had; (2) that the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions; (3) that the discovery may be had only by a method of discovery other than that selected by the party seeking discovery; (4) that certain matters not ired into, or that the scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters; ... t the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in se 1 opes to be opened as directed by the court. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280. + +Settlements of claims by alleged victims and Epste t tly the type of discovery Rule 1.280 was intended to address. Rule 1.280 requires requires 's Slls, to protect not only Epstein, but the alleged victims who are not parties to this lit' lbst i , m embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden. Furthermore, Florida's Consti • coco ins an express right to privacy, and a person's financial information is among th r• rotected by that right to privacy. Art. I, § 23, Fla. Const. ("Every natural person ght to be left alone and free from governmental intrusion into his private life excep rerwise provided herein."); v. State Farm Florida Ins. Co., 198 So. 3d 871, Fla. 2 DCA 2016). Although there is no list in our constitution as to those matters enco y the term privacy, it was apparent to the Fourth District Court of Appeal that p ances are among those private matters kept secret by most people. Woodward v. Berkey, 714 So. 2d 1027, 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); citing Winfield v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 477 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1985) (law in Florida recognizes an individual's legitimate expectation of privacy in individual's private bank account, financial records). + +Any order from this Court requiring the production of settlement agreements of Any Other Tort Claimants who has nothing to do with M, and has no legitimate impact on liability, value or damages of claim in this action, would be a departure from the essential requirements of law and reversible on appeal. See-, supra; Woodward, supra. + +Therefore, Epstein requests that this Court enter an order protecting My Other Tort Claimants and Epstein (the only parties to the confidential settlement agreements ttlement agreements (and payments) are not an admission of and do not reflect ten or extent of Epstein's liability in those actions and have even less to do with any ility or damages in this action. By seeking their production, only see em rrass, harass and annoy Tort Claimants. This Court is wholly within its au ' o reclude this type of irrelevant and Epstein and, more significantly, compelling their produc %' w be detrimental to Any Other c \,a harassing discovery. My disclosure of these ils1 te e v p,reements and amounts is tantamount to a departure from the essential requirem oft law and irreparable harm to both Epstein and those settling parties who have co 'o Yprivacy rights. + +## B. All Settlement Agree cots ust be Excluded from Evidence Pursuant to Sections 90.401 and 90.403. Florida Statutes + +In his Dece O 7, Second Amended Exhibit List, listed at No. 119, "All Settlement Au ehveen Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations." (D.E. 1109.) In response iced the following objections: (3) relevance; (4) probative value substantially outweigh y danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence; (7) hearsay; (8) authenticity; (12) not provided to counsel; and (14) confidential. (D.E. 1120.) Epstein now moves in limine pursuant to section 90.104, Florida Statutes to prevent any disclosure or reference at the trial of this matter to the total number + +of claims that were settled, the settlement agreements and the settlement amounts (either individually or in the aggregate) of Three Tort Claimants and Any Other Tort Claimants. + +### I. Relevance and Probative Value + +Any and all settlement agreements and individual and aggregate settlement amounts must be excluded because they are irrelevant to the case at hand pursuant to section 90.401, Florida Statutes. To the extent could argue remote relevance, any alleged "p e value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of u isleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." § 90.403, alley v. Multicon Dev., Inc., 417 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). "'Unfit' has been described as 'an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper b (c or) only, though not necessarily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is di \ e dente which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.'" re~. tate, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th ). See also Canales v. Compania de Vapores Realma, S.A., 564 So. 2d 1212 (FI 1990). + +This Court has made i leer at may try to prove the elements of malice by allowing to di erally the number of pending claims that existed in December 2009 and the fin 1 ex sure those claims represented. The settlement amounts of Three Tort C have zero relevance to burden of proof, and evidence of Any Other Tort C ' settlements obviously even less. Rather, they are being sought to tarnish the jury's view of Epstein and inflame the jury against Epstein. In other words, Epstein is damned if the amounts are disclosed or not — they will either be so high as admission of great guilt, or too low as further alleged abuse of the civil tort claimants. This improper use of confidential settlement agreements constitutes classic grounds for preclusion of production and admission into evidence. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017). + +In Fischman v. Klarquist, Sparkman, , Leigh & Winston, Civ. No. 94-1057, 1995 WL 264213 (D. Or. May 1, 1995), the plaintiff sued her former employer alleging sexual harassment. As in this case, one party sought production of the plaintiffs settlement of another sexual abuse case which, like the agreement here, contained a confidentiali ion. The defendant sought to compel production of the prior settlement, but the c production holding, "these materials are of no evidentiary value in this case. Th C o ) reflect only the settlement of certain allegations made heretofore." Id. at \*1. + +Similarly, in Butta-Brinkman v. FCA Internatio nq ii ., F.R.D. 475 (N.D. III. 1995) a plaintiff sued her employer charging sexual ha 14/ c t., e plaintiff sought production of "S ih settlement agreements entered by the empl s r ,ii' s r r cases. The federal court denied the plaintiffs motion to compel noting the s g pu c policy "weigh[ing] in favor of keeping such documents protected." Id. at 476-7 + +These holdings are con tent rth a series of federal cases that likewise have held based on the strong public poi rotect confidential settlement agreements. See v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. F.R... 548, 554-55 (E.D. Ca. 1990) (denying motion to compel production of documen mg information about confidential settlement discussions); Bottaro v. Hatton Assoc D. 158, 160 (E.D. N.Y. 1982) (denying motion to compel production of settlement agreement); Grove Fresh Distribs., Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd., 888 F. Supp. 1427, 1441 (N.D. III. 1995) (denying production and holding "while there is simply no legitimate public interest to be served by disclosing settlement agreements, the parties to the agreement are likely to have a compelling interest in keeping the settlement amount confidential"). + +These federal decisions are persuasive because section 90.408, Florida Statutes, and its identical federal counterpart, Federal Rule of Evidence 408, recognize the same public policy which generally precludes the introduction and use of settlements at trial, as well as in discovery. Both the Florida and Federal Rules of Evidence recognize that evidence, even where relevant, should be excluded where the relevance is outweighed by its prejudicial value. § 90.403, Fla. Stat.; Fed. R. Evid. 403. + +The federal decisions dealing directly with sexual abuse cases are pert • with Florida decisions barring the introduction of settlement agreements involvin aims. Charles B. + +M Real Estate, Inc. v. Hater, 602 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA V 2) olved a claim by a real estate broker seeking to recover a commission on the sale or rcial property. A prior lawsuit is performance. The prior lawsuit settled and the real estate broker sought to hit c' t settlement agreement in its lawsuit. The appellate court acknowledged the gene t settlement agreements are inadmissible and found that the exclusion of the se ment was proper. Id. at 963. The court noted that there are many potential reaso e a lawsuit, even if a party could ultimately prevail, and stated that, even if relevi probative value of the settlement would be outweighed by the prejudice and co 'on its dmission would cause. Id.; see § 90.403, Fla. Stat. had been filed by the purchaser against the seller s + +Like v. Atlantic Coast Refining, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), the co ed a confidential settlement agreement and held that the evidence was not relevant because it was "incapable of proving or disproving any material fact." Id. at 717. Additionally, the court found that, even if relevant, any probative value "was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to defendant." Id. + +As seen from both Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 1042) and his Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109), it is apparent that he intends to use as much information from other cases as possible solely to impermissibly "inflame[] the jury or appeal 0 improperly to the jury's emotions," or "solely to prove bad character." v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). "[1]f the introduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a confusion in t ds of the jurors in excess of the legitimate probative effect of such evidence if it ten dri rather than illuminate the true issue before the jury then such evidence should be xcltlSed. City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing P c) v. ell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)). See also Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Ne u . Inc., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudi • " Sf, c v v hen evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. ;i ,% . 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal al' was tweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, and misleading of the jury, t 'dente and instruction concerning status as an illegal alien improperly changed the f e jury's attention). + +Clearly, settlemen een Epstein and any tort claimants have zero relevance, and only alicious prosecution action brought by was not d•even if he was, these confidential settlement agreements and amounts are prejudicial effect sexually irrelev proceeding. burden of proving that Epstein had no probable cause to institute the original civil + +# CONCLUSION + +In reliance on the Florida Evidence Code and applicable law cited herein, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order in Limine precluding Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. his counsel, and his witnesses from making any argument, statement, evidence, or comment, regarding, as well as precluding from use at trial, the settlement agreements and settlement amounts, and holding all of the same inadmissible, and that the Court deny ore tenus Motion to Compel the production of the confidential settlement agreements and any further breakdown of the settlement amounts. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the ,listed on the Service List below on January 10, 2018, through the Court's e-filintors want to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & RO 1555 Pal West P (56 H, PA es Boulevard, Suite 301 Florida 33401 ; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +CottJ. Link + +ttJ. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(glinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(pinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice©Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore tenus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ J. ██████ ("██████") the following: + 1. a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 2. b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 3. c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*"The court has reviewed the heavy transaction and the concepting orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's brainstorms at the surface hearing."* (R) + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b 84sed to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in this litigation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connection with a motion, hearing, deposition or trial, before any such information is quoted, disclosed, relied upon or used, the party must file a Motion to have the information or documents deemed to be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under seal in accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclosure, reliance or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. • + +4. The Court defers rulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amounts disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlementTamounts of-' three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of-' three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclosure of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under seal-in -accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epstein's Motion. S shall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in ctions. + +DONE AND ORD in West Palm Beach, Palm Be County, Florida this 'Tlay of DuceiTiEr; 20131 + +> DONALD W. HAFELE UDGE + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepQsearcylaw.com | h rt & Shipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| isx@searcvlaw.corn | nis@FLAAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolateamgisearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Sinsellairdant/Coimter-Plaintiff J. | +| J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@epllc.com | Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com | +| staffietile@pathotojustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts Page 4 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(Thampa.com smahonev@agv'pa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 , Scott@linkrocklaw.com - Karealinkrocklaw.com Aneela@linkrocklaw.coui Tina@linkrocklaw.com Troy@linkrocklaw.com Tanya@linkrocklaw.com EserviceQlinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey E stein' ti + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOLUO 7 + +# TRANSC Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 Epstein and victims of sexual molestations. + +2 Again, I would have to see those when the +3 time comes. I am most interested in the +4 three individuals at issue. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, there have +6 been objections that have been raised to the +7 production of those documents on the basis +8 of a contractual confidentiality provision. + +9 If the allegation remains that these +10 cases -- the three at issue -- were somehow +11 ginned up, then the value of the claims in +12 general is at least discoverable with regard +13 to making a determination as to whether the +14 claims were ginned up. + +15 And again, the degree of financial +16 exposure that Mr. Epstein was facing is +17 reflected by the settlements of all of the +18 claims that he ultimately settled after the +19 filing of this maliciously -- allegedly +20 maliciously prosecuted lawsuit. + +21 (So we will) be asking the Court to +22 (compel) (production) (of) (all) (of) (those) (settlement) +23 (agreements.) + +24 (THE COURT:) (THAT'S) (something) (that) +25 (probably) (will) (need) (to) (be) (dealt) (with) (probably) + +1                   a(t) @ (special-set) (hearing.)   (SO (I) (would) +2                   (suggest) (that) (we) (set) (something) (in) (the) (near) +3                   (future) (for) @ (half-hour) (hearing) (so) (that) (we) +4                   (can) (deal) (with) (those) (issues) (independently.)   (I) +5                   (think) (it's) (worth) (some) (time) (to) (be) (taken.) + +6                   Phone journal taken from Epstein's home +7                   and produced to the FBI by Rodriguez. +8                   That's the houseman.   Same ruling as I made +9                   earlier with regard to that. + +10                  Photograph depicting Roberts, Maxwell +11                  and Prince Andrew. + +12                  MS. ROCKENBACH:   No relevance to this +13                  action.   It's prejudicial. + +14                  THE COURT:   Same argument, Mr. Scarola? + +15                  MR. SCAROLA:   Yes, sir.   Same argument. + +16                  THE COURT:   Sustained, unless further +17                  information develops to bring to the Court +18                  otherwise. + +19                  All flight logs.   We talked about those +20                  before.   Same ruling. + +21                  Evidence of contributions to the Palm +22                  Beach Police Department.   Sustained.   Same +23                  ruling. + +24                  MR. SCAROLA:   Yes, sir.   I did speak of +25                  that, the source of information regarding + +Mr. Epstein does show up for trial, one of the very first questions I'm going to ask him is, Did you make this statement to the New York newspaper? + +)THE) COURTfl (I7i1Ri)0) said?05 (Wnn)(take) caug)Twagrocammcomes1 We canif-MI6T) ariTZTIM(CHZ)Oa5Worions)arn(tq)(same)taIEWP gfirg)(0)(1M(discussiirej)(prg11081 settlement)(agreements, All r ght are + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank y our Honor. THE COURT: Thanks a our court reporter for staying a ng through this, as we have, + +MR. SCARO Itassume that we are going to de g7i wFifth Amendment issues as the firs issu when we reconvene? + +COURT: Well, I thought we talked ose already. + +MR. SCAROLA: No, no. You remember at I identified every question and answer? + +THE COURT: You are talking about the individual questions and answers. Yes, sir. Absolutely. And we will take those up first, and then we will go to the motions to compel and motion for protective order, if + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE + FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN + AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS + +DATE TAKEN: Thursday, December 7th, 2017 + TIME: 10:01 a.m. - 12:57 p.m. + PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11B + West Palm Beach, Florida + BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Sonja D. ██████████ + Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. + 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + (561) 471-2995 + +1 2 that were brought by Edward's clients -- E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe -- were relevant. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 So I just wanted, for the record, to be definitive, in that, we are not trying the other claims that may have been represented by other attorneys -- like Mr. Scarola, Mr. Josefsberg -- because they would be only irrelevant, they would be very prejudicial to my client receiving a f it trial. + +11 THE COURT: Mr. Scar c + +12 13 14 \ t MR. SCAROLA: It ' n y intent to A ASS' get into the merit a of the other claims. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Howeve e use motive is clearly relevant nd m erial, and because malice is rele nt an material, both with regard to t e pr ary claim and with regard to the ( Sr a u 'tive damages claim, we respectfully uggest that it is error if we were not permitted to talk about what Mr. Epstein's motive was for taking the extraordinary step of filing a baseless claim against + +25 (TTE)(COURTi) (WW1-fl(until) we (gel) in + +1(obviously,) what may or may not be asked of + +2Mr. ( [REDACTED] and Mr. Epstein principally on + +3these cases or these issues,) the global + +4order of the Court would be that those + +5individual claims would not be subject to + +6discussion as to the merits,) as Mr. Scarola + +7has stipulated. + +8(However,) as it relates to both probable + +9cause,) i.e.,) motive and malice,) the number + +10of claims ( that is,) speaking in terms of + +11volume ( that Mr. Epstein was facing at the + +12time that he brought the suit and continued + +13the prosecution of that suit would be + +14relevant. So that's the distinction being + +15drawn by the Court,) the detail,) the merits,) + +16whatever may have been discovered as it + +17relates to those cases would not be + +18individually admissible in evidence,) or any + +19of those details from those cases. + +20(However,) as I said,) the sheer number of + +21cases may be relevant,) i.e.,) to tend to + +22prove or disprove a material fact as it + +23relates to probable cause and malice. So + +24that's the decision. + +25Next issue, please. + +1 But I'm pretty sure that some cases + 2 were filed by Mr. Josefsberg. + +3 THE COURT: Thank you. + +4 Ms. Rockenbach, so as far as the + 5 collateral claims are concerned -- by no + 6 means am I minimizing those by using that + 7 terminology. It's just to distinguish the + 8 three cases that are at the heart of this + 9 case as it relates to the malicious + 10 prosecution claim as opposed to those other + 11 folks -- those other young women, in + 12 particular, who had either brought suit or + 13 made claims that were paid by Mr. Epstein. + +14 (The ruling of the Court is that I am + 15 going to find at this point -- again,) + 16 (subject to further inquiry at a later time) + 17 (and whether or not that becomes an issue is) + 18 (going to be subject to further scrutiny --) + 19 but I'm going to find that that information + 20 would be discoverable, i.e., what was the + 21 total amount of payments made by) + 22 Mr. Epstein? + +23 At this point I am withholding my + 24 ruling -- or deferring ruling on + 25 admissibility, just for the record --) + +1                     (because (you) all) are (far) better aware of the +2                     (standard than (I) (--) but) the (standard) being +3                     (because (discovery) (is) (broader) than what) may +4                     (be) (admissible) at (trial), the (total) amount +5                     (paid), again), goes (back) to (that) place in (time) +6                     (when MR. Epstein would) have (brought) this +7                     (lawsuit) at (or) near the (time) of +8                     (MR. Rothstein's (arrest)) at (or) near the (time) +9                     (of (federal) and (perhaps) (state) agents (raiding) +10                    (the (offices) of the (firm)) at (or) near the (time) +11                    (of these) cases (reaching) a (crescendo) as (far) +12                    (as (discovery) was (transpired)) and (then) +13                    (ultimately) (--) at (least) these (three) cases (--) +14                    (settling) (less) than a (year) (thereafter), as (I) +15                    (recall). (You) can (correct) me (if) (I) am (wrong). +16                         (So) (the) (motive), (malicious), (probable) +17                    (cause) (issues) (that) we (have) (talked) about (at) +18                    (length) in the (past), again), because of the +19                    (nature) of (discovery) being (broader) than what +20                    (may) be (admissible) at (trial), (I) am (going) to +21                    (require) (that) (information) be (provided), so (I'm) +22                    (deferring) as (to) (its) (admissibility). +23                         (Any) (confidentiality) matters (that) may +24                    (have) (attached) to (those) (settlement) offers (--) +25                    (strike) (that) (--) to (those) (settlement) payments + +1(would) also have to be discussed at a later + (2) time. + +3(Section 90.408,) for the record,) states,) + +4(though,) "Evidence of an offer to compromise + +5a claim which was disputed as to validity or + +6amount,) as well) as any relevant conduct or + +7statements made in negotiations concerning a + +8compromise,) is inadmissible to prove + +9liability or absence of liability for the + +10claim or its value. End quote. + +11(So this is concerning,) obviously,) in + +12(light) of the statute,) as to not only the + +13global settlement number that may be + +14involved,) but also as it relates to the + +15three individuals. + +16Now,) that's not squarely before me + +17today. And I would rather be able to deal + +18with that at some other time so that it's + +19fully briefed and we know where we are going + +20on this,) because Mr. Scarola has his own + +21rationale for insisting that the \$5.5 + +22million figure associated between the three + +23individuals involve directly here would,) in + +24his view,) be admissible. + +25Mr. Epstein largely hanging his hat on + +12 al29 (14) 5) (1-O (r8) tggraaTiO(D wou cgoranvatroutl TEENQD0017m5 1 gclgaingim (wouid)NuggglisNymogg (M)(Rockenbach (Th) (separate) (17O5:1115) part]ac p (gm motion) in o o LEDEDGME)(wourd) (asks in aT9 o separate) eout)cand)(awn (ft)(F0ir al ou special) (Fa)(hearing)(and) we (wiTI) ft Cu DEO.WrK)EnT)(CiThe7n + +section 90.408 takes a different view. + +Similar to the hearsay rule, there are noted and notable exceptions to 90.408, meaning that, in the hearsay context, if the information is not being used to prove the truth of the matter asserted, there are other ways in order to get that informa in. + +O Similarly, I am at least gene ica ly ons that have been stated under th- 90.408. aware that there have been ex + +I would rather get into, now, these issues of Fifth Amendment privilege that have been scheduled. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. + +MR. LINK: Your Honor, may I make one \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d70b8dfb3ac19b8767c35974903be585b3cad35f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786/EFTA02763786.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1515 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763786.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 31, + "chars": 43071, + "elapsed_seconds": 130.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF( EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AN N LIMINE \nOF UNRELATED SE TLEMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 518.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 518.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Court's Ruling and Epstein's Compliance", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 313.185302734375, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 313.185302734375, + 169.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 169.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Discovery of Individual Names and Amounts Not Reasonably CalcyM Lead to \nDiscovery of Admissible Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 513.2378540039062, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 513.2378540039062, + 266.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 266.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "No Relev and rejudice Far Outweighs Any Probative Value", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 426.75775146484375, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 426.75775146484375, + 528.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 528.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 555.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 555.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein Seeks an Order Protecting from Disclosure the Names and Amounts of Any \nOther Settling Tort Claimants and Production of Confidential Settlement \nAgreements Based on the Florida Constitution and Florida Discovery Rules", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 610.1835174560547 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 610.1835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. All Settlement Agree cots ust be Excluded from Evidence Pursuant to Sections \n90.401 and 90.403. Florida Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 486.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Relevance and Probative Value", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.57452392578125, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.57452392578125, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 638.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 638.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.352, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 89.352, + 325.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 469.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC &#x27; Although counsel claimed that clients wished to remain anonymous, identified E.W.'s name in his Motion and filed her deposition testimony with the Court. + +CVRA action against the federal government. E.W. is not a plaintiff in this litigation. She, in fact, has released Epstein from any and all claims. Importantly, only is seeking to recover money from Epstein in this lawsuit. Epstein has filed a separate Motion to Re-Open Discovery to Take Depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe. Epstein incorporates the arguments set forth in that Motion here. INTRODUCTION A + +This case is not about EM three clients' civil lawsuits again in IS which settled and were fully resolved in July 2010. Rather, it is about the economic in at seeks for his alleged "anxiety" and "emotional distress" that he suffer a It of Epstein's filing of a Complaint against him eight years ago. + +Epstein has tried to focus this case on the p clay able information about Rothstein, the Ponzi scheme, the use of I=' clients' mst Epstein in the Ponzi scheme and the excessive and unorthodox litigation prac ' en ed in by while holding himself out as a partner of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt to Rothstein. Unfortunately, trial strategy, to analyze and test the veracity of each of the individual allegations m e Complaint through the testimony of his clients, makes each of them a key witne e. (12/5/17 Tr. 85:1-7; 85:19-22; 131:11-12.)2 ich caused Epstein to suspect connection + +to "clear his name," recover damages and rid himself of his so-called emotional distress" brought on by Epstein's filing and continuing of this lawsuit by forcing his three clients, including E.W., into Court to rehash the details of their claims against Epstein, which they settled and put behind them more than seven years ago. The three individuals have no interest in and will receive no benefit from the outcome of this litigation, but + +&#x27;Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached hereto as Exhibit A.

examination into an allegation-by-allegation defamation analysis of the original Complaint requires inquiry of E.W., as well as L.M., into the areas alleged, including the NPA, the CVRA action and the details of his clients' claims because has made those central to the trial of this matter.

E.W. is a client of who asserted tort claims against Epstein. Those claims were resolved through a confidential settlement agreement between E.W. and Epstein my 2010. E.W., together with L.M.3, also brought a Crimes Victims' Rights Act ac • t the United States Government. The CVRA action is ongoing and, in that tr , . and L.M. are attempting to set aside a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA; entered into with the United States Government.

has informed the Court that in o S St , lish his burden of proof he will, among other things:

[Establish] Epstein's mo S to \ r get for extortionist purposes, [and] prove ip role had in the joint prosecution efforts tiple civil claims being prosecuted against Epstein with the' punitive damage exposure as well as the Crime Victim's Righ case challenginaitein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, wh as spearheaded by and exposes Epstein t thy incarceration for his extensive history of child mol atio

(11/22/17, Et pone in Opposition to Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, e.s.) [D.E. 41

intends to prove that Epstein's motive for filing this action was to, among other things, force to abandon his efforts to set aside the NPA through the CVRA action:

10 And we intend to prove that Jeffrey 11 Epstein's motive in filing these knowingly 12 false claims against Brad - his 13 motive was to extort into

L.M. also resolved her claims more than seven years ago, in July 2010.

14 abandoning or cheaply compromising the 15 rights of his clients, and abandoning his 16 efforts through the Crime Victims' Rights 17 Act case to set aside the non prosecution 18 agreement.

(11/29/17 Tr. 106:10-18, e.s.)4

3 And Mr. Epstein clearly knows that 4 Mr. is lead counsel in this Crime 5 Victims' Rights Act case. He clearly knows, 6 because he's a participant in that case. H 7 has intervened in the case. He knows that 8 the consequences of that Crime Victims 9 Rights Act case could be that he lose 10 immunity that he negotiated with t 11 Attorney's Office. 12 So being able to push Brad Edw 13 aside as the primary moving force n the 14 Crime Victims' Rights Act case is obviously 15 a reasonable conclusion Ba se 16 circumstances.

(11/29/17 Tr. 112:3-16, e.s.)

has argued that the jury St b uformed about both the NPA and the CVRA:

13 MR. SCAROLA-14 that it i 15 informed 16 agreemen 17 ente it into evidence. They need to 18 unde - gle' d what the Crime Victims' Rights 19e c: y. i onor, I believe dable that the jury be o what the non-prosecution It would be our intention to

(11/29/17 Tr. 3- .)

as identified E.W. on his Witness List. [D.E. 1042, ¶ 15.] has also designated'khd cross designated portions of E.W.'s testimony to be used at the trial of this matter. [D.E. 1022; D.E. 1130.] Because E.W. is incarcerated, the parties can only rely on her deposition testimony at trial.

Excerpts of the November 29, 2017, hearing transcript are attached hereto as Exhibit B.

(12/5/17 Tr. 79:24- s .24 It illY

? e part of as so recognized that the NPA and the CVRA action are going to become a

The Court has made it clear that it intends to allow to present evidence and testimony concerning representation of his three clients (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) of claims they brought against Epstein:

24 THE COURT: The only thing I would say 25 to that, Mr. Scarola, is I don't want to mix 1 apples and oranges. And that is, I don't 2 want to place the Court's incriminator [sic] o 3 getting too far afield and turning this into 4 a case about alleged sexual exploitation, 5 particularly of others, outside of 6 Mr. ' representation. That woul 7 serve only to inflame the jury, and, 8 would cause the playing field to be 9 unleveled, because the defense to th 10 malicious prosecution claim, i Epstein 11 and his attorneys, would hay fighting 12 claims that they may not e about 13 much, much less the ones ey do. 14 So again, I want to ce those 15 three claims that we t by 16 Mr. on is clients, and 17 center on those hat would be 18 relevant to the us prosecution claim 19 and the alleg ing up of those claims, 20 the alleged to align himself with 21 Rothstein lleged attempt to factor 22 these ca tentially Mr. 1 23 conduct related to those factoring 24 matt s.

\* \* \*

3 there is no way around the fact that the NPA 4 is going to become a part of this trial.

(11/29/17 Tr. 108:3-4.)

11 THE COURT: The NPA, I have already 12 indicated that the inclination would be - 13 if properly predicated - would be allowed.

(11/29/17 Tr. 167:11-13.)

9 Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 vs. US 10 case.

11 MR. SCAROLA: That's the CVRA 12 Your Honor. case,

13 THE COURT: That will likely be

14 discussed - obviously, it will be

15 discussed. How much of the pleadings

16 need to be addressed will be a matt

17 Court's consideration later.

(12/5/17 Tr. 215:9-17.)

OCTOBER 12, 2017, DEP2Sic

On October 12, 2017, Epstein's counsel co Vbut did not conclude because of counsel's direction to the witness no questions until the issue of a protective order had been resolved, the deposition he Gadsden Correctional Facility where E.W. is incarcerated until April 2018. W. was represented by himself during her deposition, counsel who not representing E.W.) instructed her not to answer questions that related to t e e !It VRA action because he claimed they were not relevant and because E.W. did not hav oppo nity to prepare for that line of questioning. Specifically, counsel asse

Ale, MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, I'm going to 8 questions relating to the Crime Victims' Rights Act 9 case?

7 interrupt for just a moment. Do you have other

10 MR. GOLDBERGER: I do.

11 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. I am going to object to

12 your examination of [E.W.] on issues relating to

13 another case. Those matters don't have any relevance

14 or materiality to this lawsuit in which she is being

15 deposed; her counsel has not had an opportunity to

16 prepare her for a deposition in the Crime Victims'

17 Rights Act case. I am going to instruct her not to 18 answer any additional questions regarding the Crime 19 Victims' Rights Act case. You may proffer the 20 additional questions that you'd like to ask for the 21 record, but she will not answer those pending our 22 ability to obtain a protective order. 23 MR. GOLDBERGER: Well, we have lots of 24 questions that we intend to ask about the Crime 25 Victims' Rights Act, and based on your cause of action

1 and your theory that you've explained to thes24.rt as 2 to why Mr. Epstein filed a claim against yo 3 it is relevant and I recognize that you arl wising 4 the client not to answer the question o 5 MR. SCAROLA: She's not my client, thi 6 witness. 7 MR. GOLDBERGER: And you're instruct 8 MR. SCAROLA: And I am instructirogliker - I 9 am informing you that additionaa gabstions relating to 10 the Crime Victims' Rights Act case, beyond those that 11 have already been asked and answered, are not relevant 12 or material, or reasonably calculated to lead to 13 relevant and material ormation.

(E.W.'s 10/12/17 Tr. 74:6-75:13, c.s.) [D.E

6 MR. SCAROLA: Y 7 irrelevant, 8 lead to the 9 informati questions are al, not reasonably calculated to ery of relevant and material is lawsuit.

\* \* \*

11 W. S OLA: In addition to that, this 144 , A 1 ;tness was not noticed as being deposed in a separate C action. Her counsel, with regard to the separate VRA action were not noticed, therefore her counsel ave not had an opportunity to consult with her 6 regarding giving testimony in the separate CVRA -

+

\* \* \*

18 MR. SCAROLA: -- action. So those are the 19 objections that were previously raised, in addition to 20 others stated as to specific questions, they are of 21 the objections that I will incorporate simply by 22 saying "same objection, same instruction," for 23 purposes of not burdening the record with repetition 24 of the same objection and same instructions.

(E.W.'s 10/12/17 Tr. 97:6-24.) [D.E. 1027.]

counsel suggested that questions to E.W. be proffered on the record and he would raise the appropriate objections and move for a protective order and that E.W. would not answer those questions until he had the ability to move for a protective order, thus leaving this issue open for further deposition testimony. (E.W.'s 10/12/17 Tr. 76:24-77:8.) [D.E. 1027.]

The following questions were posed to E.W. to which she was instruct to answer based on these objections:

  • At any time did the FBI agents -- did any FBI age that Mr. Epstein was pleading guilty in state court to avoid federal tion?
  • Did you ask the FBI at any time to s entering into his guilty plea?
  • Did you have the prosecutor's p
  • Did you, in fact, receive a i ification letter? ecutors prior to Mr. Epstein so you could call her?
  • And on that letter, di' of h e the prosecutor's direct-dial number?
  • And did the p time to dis tter? fact, tell you in person that you could call her at any
  • Do yo ll receiving a letter from Ms. Villafania when you met with the FBI at Publ 7? ou deny that you had Ms. Villafania's direct phone number to call her if o decided? Do you know whether the non-prosecution agreement made it easier for you to seek damages against Mr. Epstein?
  • How many times did you meet with the FBI at Publix to discuss the nonprosecution agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein?
  • Do you recall when you did meet with [Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall], at no time did you ask to confer with anyone from the government about any potential criminal charges, decisions, or about any partial resolution of the matter involving Jeffrey Epstein?

  • Is it true that, between the time of that interview in August of 2007, and September of 2007 when Mr. Epstein signed his non-prosecution agreement, you never contacted either Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall or her co-agent asking for information about the investigation; or asking to confer with anyone from the government about any potential criminal charges, decisions, or about the resolution of the matter?
  • What were your goals as a plaintiff in filing the CVRA case?
  • Was one of your goals to invalidate the non-prosecution agreem nt
  • Have you ever discussed with [L.M.] the filing of the CVR suit.
  • Have you ever discussed with any non-lawyer, o working for a lawyer, the reasons for filing the CVRA case?
  • Do you realize that if you prevail on the C agreement is ruled void, any civil settle Rights Act case could be vacated?
  • Are you seeking an apology f case? Is that important to yo and the non-prosecution relied on the Civil Victims' vemment for the filing of the CVRA

(E.W.'s 10/12/17 Tr. 77-82, 98-100.) [D.E. 10

In his Complaint, Epste at, after joined Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, he filed a Motion asking e Court to make the NPA public. (D.E. 5, 1 42.1.) That motion was filed in May 2009 e' ne tc o client's individual civil actions against Epstein, not in the CVRA actio c e e v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893, D.E. 74.) At the time filed the mo his three clients had the NPA and there was no legitimate purpose for them to make the a ement public. Furthermore, the CVRA court had then recently (February 2009) denied Motion to Unseal the NPA in that action. (Jane Doe v. U.S., Case No. 08-CV-80736, D.E. 36.)

\*MENT

was to stop wants the Court to believe, however, that Epstein's motive in filing this action from challenging the NPA through the CVRA action. What failed

to inform the Court about at the recent hearings, however, is that at the time Epstein filed suit against Rothstein and in December 2009, the CVRA action had been sitting dormant since February 2009 and that he took no further action in that matter until after settled his clients' cases with Epstein and then only after the Court administratively closed the case in September 2010. also failed to inform the Court that in August 2008, he dvised the CVRA court that he was unsure if the relief he was seeking was in his clien t interest. ("Because of the legal consequences of invalidating the current agreemen ' A• Se ly not in my clients' best interest to ask for the relief that we initially asked for. jf t8 r. 4-5) (Ex. C.) Furthermore, in each of their Complaints against Epstein, ents relied on the NPA as a basis that Epstein could not deny liability of their clai y initiated their civil lawsuits against Epstein in August and September 2008. (E S. ► i p ein, 156 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058, D.E. 4, ¶¶ 19-20); (L.M,m 15ih Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008- CA-028051, D.E. 4, ¶y 19-20); (Jane v. EThtein, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No. 9:08-cv-80893, -21). The filing of his clients' Complaints coupled with statements to th court led Epstein to believe that clients were not pursing their remedies in action. It was not until March 21, 2011, about a year after settling their laws with Lipstein, when E.W. and L.M. filed their Motion for Summary Judgment for Finding olat ns of the NPA, that it was clear that E.W. and L.M. were continuing with their efforts e the NPA.

Epstein should be able to present evidence at trial to show that E.W. and L.M.'s pursuit in invalidating the NPA was not a motive for filing his action against Rothstein and The types of questions posed to E.W. during her deposition and the many logical follow-up questions concerning the CVRA action are relevant. They shed light on the timing of the filing of the CVRA

action, the lack of prosecution of the case, how the NPA actually benefited E.W. up to the point she settled her case with Epstein, her discussions with third parties, including law enforcement, about the alleged acts and her past recollections and positions. In addition, E.W.'s responses to the questions are expected to undermine her credibility because her statements have been inconsistent. Finally, it is believed that E.W.'s responses will demonstrate a lack of m mory as to events that occurred years ago when the alleged acts occurred. The testimony sod relevant and will allow the jury to weigh E.W.'s testimony and credibility at trial.

On October 26, 2017, filed a Motion for Protective c ng that the Court preclude E.W. from responding to those questions proffered ci3 e rd with respect to the CVRA action. [D.E. 1026.] During the deposition, Edw t' c el, who did not and does not represent E.W., instructed E.W. not to respond to "Sts, ' relating to the CVRA action and objected to the line of questioning claimin As ation was irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the disc ilo ithlevant and material information in this lawsuit, and because E.W. did not have an nktu to prepare for that line of questioning. counsel indicated that before E answer the questions he needed the ability to move for a protective order, thus 1 ' his issue open for further deposition discovery. (E.W. 10/12/17 Tr. 76:24-77:8; 9 that the CV bringi ton. 4.) [ .E. 1027.] As set forth above, himself has taken the position b relevant and has made it a central focus of Epstein's alleged motive for cannot have it both ways. He cannot instruct E.W. not to answer questions about the CVRA action on the grounds that they are irrelevant, but then argue that the CVRA action is the motive behind Epstein's filing of this case.

Epstein continues to maintain that malicious prosecution Counterclaim is limited to an analysis of the civil proceeding filed by Epstein against which does not relate to

the merits of the cases filed by clients against Epstein. The case is not about whether clients' tort claims are true but, rather, it is about whether Epstein lacked probable cause to initiate and continue the original proceeding. To prevail on his Counterclaim for malicious prosecution, must prove that Epstein filed a civil proceeding against him "without probable cause." See Korman v. M, 821 So. 2d 408, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). burden is "onerous." See v. GCC Beverages, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 19

While Epstein disagrees that he is required to prove that each alle 1 ' theComplaint is true, he must now be allowed to defend the allegations. Accordin y, h3 Id be allowed to re-open E.W.'s deposition to ask the proffered questions an' in e follow up about the CVRA action and any other issues that may now be a of this case in light of the Court's recent rulings.

himself has insisted that CV action is relevant to establish Epstein's motive for initiating this proceeding. Acc i Court should deny Motion for Protective Order and grant Epstein's requ~t t en E.W.'s deposition, both as to the CVRA action and follow up as well as o tions that are relevant to this proceeding. Because E.W. is incarcerated and not released until after the special set trial of this matter, Epstein will be prejudiced if t allowed to re-open the deposition.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 10, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
+ West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+ (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link
+ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
+ Angela M. Many (FBN 26680)
+ Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+ Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + +
+ Jack Scarola
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████████ J. ██████████ + 		+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████████ J. ██████████ +
+ + + + + + + + +
+

J. [REDACTED]
+Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

VOLUO 7

TRANSC <t TP PROCEEDINGS ?S H\

14 ...,

O4

DATE TA uesday, December 5th, 2017 TIME: 10:02 a.m. - 4:35 p.m. PLA 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida FORS: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

A46 :) This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aid, when and where the following proceedings were ; rted by:

Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

1 2 about children being transported on the airplane?

3 4 5 6 7 8 THE COURT: The latter is the one that will have to be discussed further, again, as I pointed out earlier, when the context comes up and it's introduced or attempted tAz: be introduced outside the presence of t NS:" jury.

9 10 11 To the, what I perceive to be three questions, the two former que s the answer would be yes.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ASel MR. SCAROLA: Wil h ourt take ASIS 1 judicial notice of 1 i Statute 90.404 c (2), which is c on referred to as the Federal Rule 415(g), which ex permits the introduction of evidc ce wi h regard to other sexual against children, so that the jury s ware of the fact that Mr. , not 0 nly had a good faith basis to conduct this discovery, but quite arguably would have been grossly negligent to have failed to pursue it?

24 GLD (THE)(COURT? (The) on (EHTTE0 Q (siay) to (t 1 TE t7)LI41 agat2jra is Q rc ct 6..Ta 7r ) to mix

apples and oranges. And that is, I don't

[2]

want to place the court's incriminator on

③

(getting) (too) (far) (afield) (and) (turning) (this) (into)

④

(a case about alleged sexual exploitation)

⑤

[particularly of others, outside of ]

6

(Mr. [REDACTED]) (representation). (That [would]

  1. ↑
    2. +

serve only to inflame the jury, and, again,

(8)

would cause (the playing field to become)

(9)

(unleveled) because (the) defense (to) (the)

[1]

[malicious] [prosecution] [claim], [i.e.] [epstein]

[1]

(and his attorneys would have to be fighting)

[1]

claims (that) (they) (may) (not) (even) (know) (about)

(13)

much, much [Less (the) (ones) (that) (they) (do).

14

(So again, U want to center on those)

[1]

(three claims that were brought by)

(16)

Mr. Edwards on behalf of his clients, and

(17)

center on those aspects that would be

[1]

(relevant) to (the) (malicious) (prosecution) (claim)

[1]

(and (the alleged ginning up of (those claims))

(20)

(the alleged attempt to align himself with

(21)

Rothstein, the alleged attempt to factor

(22)

(these cases,) potentially Mr. ( )

(23)

conduct) as (it) related to (those factoring)

(24)

matters.

25

MR. SCAROLA: I am -- I am sorry. I

1 number 88 is Hyperion Air passenger
+ 2 manifest. Same ruling. Same thing with the
+ 3 flight information.

4 Eighty-nine. Passenger list, 90, same
+ 5 ruling.

6 Notepad/notes, Maria.

7 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument.

8 THE COURT: Same ruling.

9 (Pleadings of Jane Doe (1) and (2) vs. US)

10 (case.)

11 (MR. SCAROLA: That's the CVRA case,)

12 (Your Honor.)

13 (THE COURT: That will likely be)

14 (discussed -- obviously,) (it will) be)

15 (discussed.) How much of the pleadings that

16 need to be addressed will be a matter of the

17 (Court's consideration later.)

18 Epstein Fifth Amendment speech.

19 MR. SCAROLA: Those are just a
+ 20 reference to deposition excerpts.

21 THE COURT: Reiter letter to Krischer.

22 That's already been talked about. That's a
+ 23 duplication, unless he wrote another one.

24 I think it's a duplication. You can
+ 25 check.

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

L

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS

DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017

TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m.

PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C

t Palm Beach, Florida

BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge

This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept)

Sonja D.

Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

plaintiffs' lawyers, and I'm going to target one of these victims. I'm going to sue them both, and I'm going to show them what happens when you try to take on this billionaire. That's what he was trying to do. Plain and simple. And we are entitled, I respectfully suggest, to be able to prov just how big a motive that was, stake. what's

THE COURT: I'm not in dis with you. ent

When this went on response to Mr. Lin is presentation as to Mr. Epstein's sons were what? Was that this ca tP ned around directly to harm potent r. Epstein and provide Mr. Edw with the motivation. So I'm not sagreement with you. )b d, my first

0 A÷c ertainly one of the more pertinent things The only thing I am concerned with - that I am concerned with for today's hearing, again, relates back to how far we are going to permit the jury to hear, or how much we are going to permit the jury to hear as it relates to these other claims.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

÷onor. MR. LINK: That's correction, Your

Now, as you further described it - again, subject to Mr. Link's rebuttal -- (Ehere is no way around the fact that the NPA) (is going to become a part of this trial.)

As I have indicated earlier, and the reason for my question was to ensure that my understanding was correct that the princip reason -- or a principle reason Mr. Eps continues to invoke the Fifth Amendm because of the pendency of this case, correct?

MR. LINK: General the pending of the case --

THE CO potential of a criminal -- u her criminal exposure if the NPA get oked -- or whatever the nology is --

THE COURT: -- in Judge Marra's court, assuming he's still the Judge on the case.

MR. SCAROLA: Just to clarify that point, if I could.

There's no way around it.

MR. LINK: We understand that, Judge.

THE COURT: Fine.

The question that I am going to pose to you and Mr. Scarola now is how far we are going to go with that agreement and where the 403 analysis has to focus. So --

4ak"

Not now. When you have your O opportunity.

Mr. Scarola.

MR. LINK: Champing at AS ), Your Honor.

(MR. SCAROLA:) (that it is unavoidable that the 1.1ryjm) [informed as to`what the non-prosecution) (agreement isj It would be our intention to) enter itAnto evidence. (They need to) (understand what the Crime Victims' Rights) What they don't need to do is to esolve the legitimacy of 40 other plaintiffs' claims.

Now, some of Mr. Epstein's (sic) clients -- in fact, I think all three of them -- are identified in the non-prosecution agreement. So Mr. Epstein,

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

as part of the non-prosecution agreement, agrees to compensate each of these 40 people under specific circumstances. And that gets us into a discussion as to why the federal lawsuit was filed. And this is something that we have referenced briefly in argument before Your Honor earlier. But

THE COURT: I want to stay on thisO subject for just a moment, if I coul that is, tell me why you belie t the motivation that Mr. Epstein e had to file this suit was rela or is related to this Jane Doe mov unseal the NPA. Explain that to ain, please.

MR. S es, sir.

I thin t t, obviously, motive can only be en through circumstantial nce if the defendant is not confessing. not only is Mr. Epstein not confessing, e's refusing to give considerable relevant testimony because of his assertion of both the attorney-client privilege in the absence of any assertion of advice of counsel defense, as we have already established, and his Fifth Amendment privilege. So we need

to prove what his motive is circumstantially.

(And Mr. Epstein clearly knows that)

Mr. is lead counsel in this Crime (Victims' Rights Act case.) (He clearly knows,) (because he's a participant in that case.) ED (has intervened in the case. He knows that (the consequences of that Crime Victims') (RiAghts Act case could be that he\_los s the (immunity that he negotiated wit' th U.S.) (Attorney's Office.)

So being able to p r aside as the primar ov force in the Crime Victims' ct case is obviously a reasonable cclu ion from those C circumstanc . But it goes beyond that, because ct threats were made to ds by Jeffrey Epstein.

0 THE COURT: So the suggestion, I guess, "lefrom - the defense, the malicious prosecution claim of Mr. Epstein is that he found it necessary to file the lawsuit -- strike that.

Yeah. He found it necessary to file the lawsuit against Rothstein, and

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

collateral to the summary judgment -- the summary judgment motion was made and then not challenged. For those reasons, I'm going to sustain the objection at this time, again, subject to context for being able to readdress it, if necessary.

MR. SCAROLA: Number four is sustainej

THE COURT: Yes, sir, for the reas stated in the record.

MR. SCAROLA: Understood.

THE COURT: The NPA, I Acyt ASI.)ready)

V (indicated that the incli blob- would be --)

(if properly predicated -- would be allowed).

on tt complainants don't see an w t would be the grounds for objecti that? The Jane Doe,

: I'm not sure what the MS ance is. I'm not the proponent of the ence, but I don't see what relevance here would be of Jane Doe's complaint.

The relevance in this malicious prosecution action might be the allegations of this complaint, this action. But when we start bringing in other complaints as exhibits for a jury to read, I think that

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

Dexter Lee, AUSA, and Ann C. Villafana, AUSA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JANE DOE, ) Case No.

) 08-80736-CIV-MARRA

Petitioner, )

)

-v- )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,) 46;f'

)

Respondent. ) West Palm Beach da ) August 14, 20

)

TRANSCRIPT OF

BEFORE THE HONO RANIL

U.S. JUDGE

Appearances:

C

FOR THE PETITIONE J. , ESQ., and Paul G. Cassell, ESQ.

FOR THE RABI>OND NT \

Ca2)

Re Stephen W. Franklin, RMR, CRR, CPE (56 514-3768 Official Court Reporter 701 Clematis Street, Suite 417 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

1 (Call to the order of the Court.) 2 THE COURT: Good afternoon. 3 VOICES: Good afternoon, Your Honor. THE COURT: All rig,ht. This is the case of In Re: 5 Jane Does I and 2, case number 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. 6 May I have counsel stale appearances, please, and 7 if you can please try and speak up so we can hear you. 8 MR. ISM Okay. Brad S on behalf of 9 Jane Doe I and 2. 10 MR. CASSELL: Paul Cassell, along with Mr. M. 11 THE COURT: Good afternoon. 12 MR. LEE: Good afternoon, Your Honor. For the 13 United States Government, Dexter Lee, Assistant U.S. 14 Attorney, and Villafana. 15 THE COURT: MI right Good afternoon. 16 Mr. -- everyone, we're having trouble hearing you, 17 so if you can try and speak up, and also if you could 18 idea yourself before you begin speaking so the reporter 19 can accurately indicate on the resold who is speaking. I 20 appreciate that. 21 I scheduled this for a status conference in order 22 to determine whether I'm going to need additional — as far 23 as the parties were concerned, whether either of the parties 24 thought that I needed additional information in order to 25 proceed with the pending motion by the Plaintiffs or wh

1 we have a complete record based upon what's 2 submitted, and I wasn't quite sure where we 3 since we last met. 4 So if I can hear from Mr. Edwards or Mr. 5 first what the Plaintiffs' position as far as where we stand 6 on the record in terms of whether I need additional facts, 7 evidence, or there's going to be a stipulation submitted to 8 me upon which I can rely. 9 MR. a Sure 10 Your Honor, this is Brad M. 11 I believe that you do have a sufficient record, in 12 that I don't think that I think that we're in agreement 13 that additional evidence does not need to be taken in the 14 case for Your Honor to make a ruling. We have actually met 15 with the U.S. Attorney, and we've had meaningful discussions 16 in an attempt to resolve our issues. I think the only issue, 17 we can probably agree to this right now, is that the victims 18 are unable at this point in time to go any further with 19 requesting a remedy from the Court without the full and 20 complete plea agreement being produced to us from the U.S. 21 Government, and the U.S. Government's hands are tied in that 22 there's a confidentiality agreement within that plea 23 agreement that prohibits them from turning that over. 24 So at this point in time, we would be asking Your 25 Honor to enter an order compelling them to turn over that PeeXls y

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 agreement, and at that point in time I think we can meet again and probably resolve our disputes amongst ourselves. THE COURT: All right. So do I understand that you're modifying your claim for relief at this point and only seeking me to compel the Government to produce the plea agreement, or are you — or is this a a preliminary step, after which you're then going to evaluate whether you want me to do something fwther? MR. a I think it's the latter, Your Honor. It is, and it will likely always be, our position that the victims' rights are violated. However, becruse of iisregal (consequences of invalidating the =rent agreS ti not in my clients' best interest to ask for the relief) (that we initially asked for) So in order to eff ve te the situation and ask for the appropn , we would just be asking Your Honor at this point inibiie to allow us to see the full entire plea agreement that is purportedly drafted to protect my victims. That only seems fair to know, you know, what the plea agi =Anent says, especially in light of the fact that Mr. Epstein knows what the plea agreement says. THE COURT: All right. And then if I grant that f, you will evaluate the agreement and then decide er to either dismiss your case or go forward and ask for additional relief?

1 MR. a (That's correct,Your Honor! 2 THE COURT: Is it your plan or is there any kind 3 of — been any kind of disencsion between you and the 4 Government as to what you — if I grant the relief of 5 requiring the Government to at least present you with the 6 agreement and let you view it, has there been any discussion 7 about you keeping it confidential and not letting it go any 8 further than your clients and using it for your 9 decision-making purposes, or do you wish to have it released 10 to you, and you would be able to use it however you wished? 11 MR. a Well, Your Honor, we would prefer 12 that it be produced to us and not have to keep it 13 confidential. I think that that creates an undue hardship on 14 us. However, if it was Your Honor's order that we do 15 maintain some confidentiality of the agreement, we would 16 certainly abide by it. 17 The reason we want it is not so that ifs 18 disseminated everywhere; however, there is a public interest 19 in viewing what happens in the court process, and this is 20 just part of it. There's no reason that it should be sealed 21 or kept confidential. Seems to be an overwhelming reason 22 to - to make it public. However, that's not our intention. 23 Our intention is just to view it, represent my clients and 24 then evaluate it and ask the Court for the appropriate relief 25 after we've seen it.

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763817/EFTA02763817.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763817/EFTA02763817.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e903c31f62b6af61ce63e516cbef10721ebe605 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763817/EFTA02763817.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1424 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763817.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 30, + "chars": 47153, + "elapsed_seconds": 148.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDAU/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.22, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 499.51165771484375, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 499.51165771484375, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTE 1VE ORDER RELATING TO E.W.'S \nDEPOSITION AND M TO COMPEL \nE.W. TO ANSWER OUEST LATING TO THE \nCRIMES VICTIMS' RIGHTS AST 0 REOPEN DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.19000244140625, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 538.5076293945312, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 538.5076293945312, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 125.19000244140625, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 352.2318115234375, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 352.2318115234375, + 559.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 559.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 222.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCTOBER 12, 2017, DEP2Sic", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 331.863037109375 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 331.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*MENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.6000061035156, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 437.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 257.6000061035156, + 437.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 457.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC &#x27; Excerpts of Mr. a November 10, 2017, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit A. + +seeking compensation for that anxiety and reputational damages. ("The more reminders that I have of the case, and the fact that there still looms this false allegation over my head, that is clearly a trigger.") 11/10/17 Tr. 12:6-8.) ("Until the truth is known and this case is behind me, [my anxiety is] the same." 11/10/17 Tr. 24:14-15.) ("[M]y reputation ... suffered damages that, unless and until a jury returns a verdict in my favor, can't be undone.") 11/10/17 Tr. 36:6-14.) + +The "false allegations" that alleges have caused him anxiety and tarnished his reputation relate to allegations connecting him an llitgdtion practices to Rothstein, who was using the cases was litigati at Epstein to perpetuate Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. 1 11/10/17 Tr. 12:9 ever, MI' counsel has a t I% stated that he was successful in discrediting Epstei a ons. (Jansen's 12/1/17 Tr. 62:24- 25.)2 In addition, himself testified th a r ation has been "resurrected" and is "better than it has been": + +> "With respect to repu l lieve that over the course of the last three years I have d darn good job resurr that was done to m on in this community." ea sn damage 5/15/13 Tr. 25:1-4.)3 + +> "Do I be 'eve It P t ght note utation is better than it has been at any ti 'n the ast, yes." 5/15/13 Tr. 41:3-4.) + +> one a good job of resurrecting my reputation from the point in re people initially believed, hey, where there is smoke there is r something — this guy must be guilty of something." 15/13 Tr. 56:12-16.) + +> "As I said then, have I dotod job at resurrecting whatever damage was done? Yes, I did." 10/10/13 Tr. 233:17-19.)4 + +2 Excerpts of Dr. Jansen's December I, 2017, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit B. + +3 Excerpts of Mr. May 15, 2013, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit C. + +4 Excerpts of Mr. October 10, 2013, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit D. + +Not only has admitted that he lost no clients as a result of Epstein's lawsuit and made more income in the past eight years than he did in the eight years before the lawsuit was filed ( 11/10/17 Tr. 30:17-31:2; 49:4-13), but he emphatically denies having incurred economic loss at all from Epstein's lawsuit. ("I have not claimed an economic loss as a result of my reputation.") 10/13/13 Tr. 238:21-22.) In order to reconcile his increas' g financial and professional success over the past eight years with the picture he attempts to f himself as an embattled eight-year victim of malicious prosecution, f tion on nonquantifiable emotional damages stemming from some hypothetical aaalwd what he himself admits is his "resurrected" reputation, based on the possibility AV e never had conversations with and never interacted with, c y )a n something on the intemet that associated him with Rothstein's Ponzi scheme: is, whom he never met, + +> The people who don't know me, th won't call me, that don't want of this association, and this of time and my relationshj people who read this who hing to do with me because hey remember from that period nod of time. + +( 11/10/17 Tr. 211:11- C . + +When asked how much would be reputational damag instead, that h u reputation sine asking the jury to award for his anxiety and Dbcember 2009, he has not (because he cannot) responded stating, compensated for his feelings stemming from unproven and unprovable + +> An amount of money that fairly and fully would measure the magnitude of the harm done to my reputation, and any consequential feelings that have resulted or continued to exist because of the damage done to my reputation. + +> > \*\*\* + +What six people believe will measure the magnitude of harm that was done. + +11/10/17 Tr. 23:22-24:7.) + +When asked how his alleged damages compared to those of his three clients, insists that his reputation in the community was hurt more than his clients, who he asserts were emotionally and physically harmed. ( 11/10/17 Tr. 212:23-213:2.) But, for obvious reasons, would not respond when asked if he suffered more harm th s clients. 11/10/17 Tr. 215:7-18.) Instead, he attempts to justify his selfis o personal monetary gain in this case with declarations that he negotiated fair MI /10/ settl) Epstein of his three clients' claims and that he "did well for them." 7 Tr. 204:24-206:4.) Unapologetically, now seeks tens of millions of dol for his claimed "emotional distress" than he recovered collectively for all three o i te combined. Worse, he plans to "clear his name," recover damages and rid hi e h so-called "anxiety" and "emotional distress" by forcing his three clients — L.M. a Jane Doe — into Court to rehash the details of their claims against Epstein, which and put behind them more than seven years ago. The three individuals have no C• r) and will receive no benefit from the outcome of this litigation and, in fact, released t • claims against Epstein in July 2010. , however, for his own financial gain a financ ago.s s o have them testify about their intensely personal claims solely to from Epstein for filing a civil lawsuit against him more than eight years + +in has tried to focus this case on the publicly available information about Rothstein, the Ponzi scheme, the use of clients' cases against Epstein in the Ponzi scheme and the + +s , in fact, wanted to drag in all anonymous alleged victims, even women he did not represent, for his own personal gain. The Court, however, is only allowing to talk about other claims in general terms. + +excessive and unorthodox litigation practices engaged in by while holding himself out as a partner of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler which caused Epstein to suspect connection to Rothstein. Unfortunately, trial strategy to analyze and test the veracity of each of the individual allegations made in the Complaint, through the testimony of his clients, makes each of them a key witness in this case. Two of the three women (L.M. and Jane Doe) have not been deposed in this case. The third woman's deposition (E.W.) was started, but was4lt ompleted and a request to reopen her deposition is the subject of a separate motion. + +# ARGUMENT + +I. In its November 27, 2017, Order on 7:I ott to Reconfirm Pretrial Deadlines, this Court noted that it might allow limited di v matter-by-matter basis upon proper motion to the extent the discovery was nec result of the Court's rulings at the November 29, December 5 and December 7, gs. (D.E. 1086.) + +2. In his November 17, 201 vi Omnibus Motion in Limine, Epstein asked the Court to exclude certain trial testi idence irrelevant to this action. (D.E. 1070.) While Epstein recognized that a limited amb nt of information regarding prosecution of the cases for his three clien I potentially be germane to the issues, Epstein asked that any evidence and test' ny tha had no bearing on malicious prosecution Counterclaim be precluded, testimony and evidence from other cases in which did not represent other p + +3. At the December 5, 2017, hearing, the Court made clear that it is going to allow the testimony of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe relating to the legitimacy of their settled lawsuits. (12/5/17 Tr. 83:1-8)6 + +&#x27; Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit E.

4. Before the hearings, Epstein did not know in what direction the trial of this case was going to proceed given the three significant pretrial hearing dates and pending motions in limine. Now that the Court has ruled and made clear that it will allow testimony and evidence for three clients, it is imperative that Epstein be allowed to take these depositions. Epstein's counsel asked the Court at the November 29, 2017, hearing to reopen the discov ry for that purpose, but the Court did not rule upon that request at that time. ("One of the we don't know, based on the rulings so far, is will E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe be ta 0• Agl s and, because that's part of the motion in limine, what we have been talking abou ... y are going to be called .... then I would like the opportunity to depose [them]. [them] ' 1/29177 Tr. 138:19-140:22.)7 Epstein will be prejudiced in his defense of t io rosecution claim if he is not allowed to reopen discovery for this limited purpos \

5. Epstein's prior counsel has ils , ducted a partial deposition of one of 'c ds unsel instructed the witness not to answer questions relating to the Crime Vi ' its Act ("CVRA") proceeding. That deposition is the subject of Motion fo ro we Order that was set for hearing on December 7, 2017, but not reached. Becau counsel and the Court have made it clear that the CVRA proceeding is got 1 point of this case, Epstein is filing a Response to Motion with a requ pen E.W.'s deposition as well. Epstein incorporates those arguments herein. clients (E.W.); however,

7 Excerpts of the November 29, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit F.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above and in Epstein's Response to Motion for Protective Order, Epstein respectfully requests that discovery be reopened to allow him to conduct the depositions of =I clients.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been tiirnished to the attorne Service List below on January 10, 2018, through the Court's e-filing po Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). ed on the ant to Florida

+6s

LINK & ROCKEVRe 1555 Palm BeacIlLaki Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm act', Florida 33401 (561) 727 ( 1) 727-3601 [fax]

ink (FBN 602991) rand Rockenbach (FBN 44903) gela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: TanyaAlinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+
+

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

+

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

+

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

+

+6s

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

VS.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

VOLUAt,

VIDEOTPA& SITION

LEY

C :Iren on Behalf of Plaintiff

O

Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard .T West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

\,'";

Examination of the witness taken before

Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

1                 counsel continues to take the position that
2                 this deposition is going to be conducted as
3                 if Mr. ██████ had never been deposed
4                 before, that we should at least deal with
5                 those four areas as to which there is
6                 agreement for inquiry, then we will worry
7                 about whether any inquiry outside those four
8                 areas will be allowed. Thank you.

9                 MR. LINK: Obviously we disagree and we
10                 are ready to proceed.

11                                         DIRECT EXAMINATION

12                 BY MR. LINK:

13                 Q     Ready, Mr. Edwards?

14                 A     Ready.

15                 Q     Are you feeling anxiety today?

16                 A     Sure.

17                 Q     Tell me about it. What anxiety do you feel
18                 today?

19                 A     (I'm (still) (--) (I'm (still) (being) (accused) (for)

(20) (committing) (crimes) (that) (I) (didn't) (commit), (and) (this) (case)

(21) (is) (my) (only) (chance) (to) (finally) (set) (that) (record) (straight).

22                 Q     So tell me about the anxiety, though. What
23                 are you feeling? Anxiety is an emotional reaction to
24                 something, correct?

25                 A     Well, for today --

1 2 A Just an anxious feeling to get this over with.

3 4 5 Q And you had that anxious feeling every single day from December 2009 through today November 10th, 2017?

6 CO A (The)(more) (reminders) utjit). Q (have) of (the) ac)1 T10(frgi,)(Eifet)(there)( -t7M)(1Wins(tili-re) fats

9 (CD (YEM)(eeaU)Ga)(1Cdilts4eafi33(=e) afTbn.)

(Lt) WeitlaWEDOWFEZ)(4511WEIWtfa5) coral (ypur)(head?)

(1a) 1cl (Pc7Firi)(scheme

(2) with oneone of (Eire) EFOITTITJUNls LI) lb7 (thy(rToei

(14) ffaTifUTTATIT1

15 Q Mr.

16 A Rig

17 Q ut why is there an allegation hanging over

18 your he case against you was dismissed in

19 20 correct?

20 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. Which case?

21 y MR. LINK:

22 Q The case against you by Mr. Epstein was

23 dismissed in 2012, was it not?

24 A Right. The case was dismissed.

25 Q Five years ago the case was dismissed,

grreWtrix="bver)tr)t7n7)t(Li'tt)(O(EIFSFTrv)

(hrare71)(person) Oporiftr8 (especially)(amongst GER

1 2 allow Mr. to complete his answer before you interrupt him.

3 MR. LINK: I got it. Thank you.

4 BY MR. LINK:

5 6 7 8 9 10 Q So I want to make sure that I understand -- I want you to tell us -- you are asking the jury award you an amount of money based on your h suffered every day anxiety as a result of suit that was filed in December 2009. Do I ave that right?

11 12 13 14 15 16 A Do you have that rig anxiety is related -- directly related harm done to my reputation as a consequ S. the filing of this false lawsuit making up th I djn a criminal associated with who is known to rrible and horrible person. I mean, that is the anxiety is related to that.

17 18 Q understand that generally. But I need to knows ci ally. Let me start by this.

19 20 21 How much are you asking the jury to award Or gt your day-in-and-day-out anxiety from cember 2009 through today?

22 C2D G12 A An amount) of move Y1 eLt (En:nib and ) (fU1T (would) measure)(tiDe (magnitude Eg the (harm (done to trr ) efrut—a-taeifiD(57O)(any)(consequentral)(reel iT- E®(that)@Iry (resulted) or continue (exist)(because) ac p (the)(damage

1 (done to amy (reputation.)

0 (Q) (Writ); much) are (you) asking) (r517)(TIT O (l (it)

O re ate)(CU)(ann-at)

0 WegaLatMeD0CtIM0MW0CCKAT) was (done. R0O

9 10 07mlainuemardwiTmemmil was(done,) and the t-11 you how I would measure the magnitude of th t d mage, I will try to walk you through that.

11 Q That would be great. t's start here.

12 13 I want you to start with to n e has the anxiety from 2009 through today ed or decreased?

14 15 A Until - case is behind m e truth is known and this the same.

16 17 18 Q So lety level you have been burdened with everiii iiir sing e day since December of 2009 hasn't 4 change in positive or negative way?

19 20 21 22 ;fr, Well, there's no scale for anxiety. You know 0 AilL Like you said, you have anxiety every single ay. It's not like you wake up and there's an anxiety meter.

23 24 25 Now, when I was first served with the lawsuit and people were asking about it and people were talking about it all the time as, Hey, look,

• Q TLLaj-t 071.ratird) e> to (you.)

(Q) encare-r-e) (not)® (dollar )(figure?)

a) LWILj (TM aJ eOrni -e) 05-arare) (wria) measure

uJ °凡 0 <0 吕山@口#&。 。帏 什: 5曲村吕 什5詈 毛曲仂 Q。8揉 斋 '。毛 H 毛。吕q 弓@岩="。 什5弓钿@。 &H什"吣 什。 毛俾尸开 吣。= 什I。仁鲁 一 Q。饰 什5云 Q衔 弓钿@严 H g尸淆°U8什'。5剔"吕什=Q什笔剔仂Q。=9 山=Q"5。目吊尸尸 <。= 毛5〉什 gx~。。巴。5①=。<@毛=一三。器c 。帏 什'。 5曲村吕 什5山- 毛曲仂 Q。口①. 闩玮 毛° 导。5剔"吕什=Q什笔剔仂Q。=9 gQ"5占 缘

一O 一 - p 闩=俾什 毛。吕q U咱"①仲什 H 毛倒昌什 吣。= g 仂什倒"什 毛挥5 冒。三N。。④什58"鲁什。Q逻 -加 仂什俾一 ,①斗①. 吕①倒口x冒& Q 。" Q①。一 〉仂①Q

宣巴 " p 目◎目目U目向昌

一 一 &岳。<①牌f鲁 妗 〉吣吕'88°①---5⑦"。啼№。。⑥5〉的¤-叶 吕gvgg<。。"口。8匮<。笔曲屺吣 切。售。矾铡幂什吣H@<@尸吣。=〖<。5⑦@昌2ag8

一曲 一④ NNN口慢一 攘 "什-仂 口。什 =天@ 烤。c 笔山蓍。 焉 伸匀Q 什,@栲@后 g g誊。& 甓踟饶拉转缝捷@阀吕谷。笔 吕①什@". g天。吣。=仂gQ'吣。=√<。g誊。选2。"<仂写@尸。

21 day. It's not like you wake up and there's an anxi
22 meter.
23 Now, when I was first served with the
24 lawsuit and people were asking about it and people
25 were talking about it all the time as, Hey, look,

Q。口① 什。吕吣 一①・信什倒g。P

p 禺。笔 吕G吕 胃① <。G 倒切酉口圉 咋。! 伯冒嘞出伯 二 "巴熬8昨。g誊⑦什吣吣

p 字。叶①-的 口。叶 Q。HH脚" 笤圜旨~

4                      A                      I just explained to you.

1 Q You have anxiety?

2 A For sure.

3 Q Have you communicated to any of the folks
4 you've represented since 2009 that you are suffering
5 from a high level of anxiety, an anxiety that should
6 be compensated by a jury in describing for them
7 whether you were fit to represent them?

8 MR. SCAROLA: Objection.

9 Attorney-client privilege. Don't answer
10 that question.

11 BY MR. LINK:

12 Q Have you not retained -- have you not been
13 retained by any client since 2009 as a result of this
14 compensable level of anxiety that you suffer every
15 day?

16 A Explain your question a little better.

17 Q (Are) (there) (any) (clients) (that) (you) (wanted) (to) (be)

(18) (your) (client) (that) (said) (I'm) (not) (going) (to) (hire) (you)

(19) (Mr.) (Edwards) (because) (I) (can) (see) (you're) (manifesting)

(20) (some) (level) (of) (anxiety) (that's) (not) (just) (a) (typical)

(21) (anxiety) (that) (we) (all) (go) (through) (it's) (a) (heightened)

(22) (level) (it's) (a) (compensable) (level) (as) (a) (result) (of)

(23) (Mr.) (Epstein's) (lawsuit)?

(24) (A) (NO)

(25) (Q) (Any) (clients) (fire) (you) (as) (a) (result) (of) (this)

I-目目 鬧U◎·霍=xH

uJ ci) 0 入J 傘\* cp 凄劍<① 嘯。G 盡鋤Q盡。牌⑧ 三。=⑧吣 。=。。g<巴吣 。桫呂 <●詈 啼竹。呂鈿gy2010 帷。"毛〉畔~ g 一。Q邏 粵詈 吣。cQ& y2010 back什。毛=g 吣。G 的什助畔吓。Q忙枓曲。ga口口 s蒜

一 C p ①劍仂一 ". 『5「①什 呂曲 ⑦ 鼽 熟 璘 g=I什 W呂1 p10bab1ybH =@<⑧畔 牌@三@盡5@牌 笔5詈 4 三0c什=. 扒 iSe一5笔5啼G

一曲 一④ NNN閥 N蜘 ③弧嫌 什5栲。℃G什曲 一℃gI 毒 什 什。 H。。戈曲一 声ZItiOn nd yOt@尋g栲〉仂仂習⑦口什 曲口Q 呂。仂。 。什5g 粵寫@仂 吣。c g山仂天旨Q 什=。 u口幃媚 g 呂。口。< 什。 <。c Orright? That'S Wh9嘴。巨 〉仂吞勻咱 村,⑦ 」c忖< 什。 Q。性 什。 。。呂℃g仂〉什。 吣。= 嗡。" 什了。 旨℃仙。竹 竹,俾竹 竹,⑦ ein 1awsuiZq 。口 絮。旨 bity 什。 p1actice 1awT1ue?

閥凸 N曲 3為. 仂。豺為。一豺" z。.

② 圖.

渊。c 曲容 仂ga置 〉什 吣。口竹 尸曲毛曦。竹. Ction

I wi11 anser he que仂g。口 一喃 5 anSer "=① 山csti。?

〈為. 幼O羅為。.>" 吣。c 。田= ~口 iO . 什,伸什

国暉 零為. 一叫z犬"

H倒仂酉口 5

A11 1昌z.牲立u倒昌逝8"碧①山什什5①ceSiOn?

(Lt) (1a) (2) a:3) (14) A (YoThrnrUriut-a-fiini (i-s)(Ta nd-e)OPED(1-41i-at) —) (thin (oa)(you.) (The)()5eC1;i3 -e) who CLdti Ct) - (know) (l g5)(:) (snaps h-dt)(5f)pita)(person)(=) (Th)(Rb-th-a (co-c o n sp ra tba)(n)(1) (Pc-rn-11)(scheme )(arid) (0) spread) that ar eAs4gg.) (fror)n ( ftj(52.) point) in tip rwardp tretligi) (9) (irTfla 2571)45Wm-i-e) or ) rrni rey a 3.55)(fight)(there) suf (that-,) 7(t111- -e7g) and C) (rry) n- )( , ./iTfp ram-g (12 . (undone.

15 16 17 18 Q So the r the nameless, faceless folks that you don kno that you have never met, never had conve ations with, never interacted with, who are -- hat ave impacted your reputation.

19 <4;;y Your question is way too extreme.

20 21 0 4 So you told me it's anyone who knows you, flows for sure that there's nothing --

22 A I didn't tell you that.

23 Q You didn't?

24 A No. Who knows me well.

25 Q They have to know you well, right?

that those things are not true.

The lawyers I practice with know that those things are not true. It's the rest of the world that --

Q II, okay.

1           Q     Fair enough. Let's make it eight to eight
+ 2 so we're comparing apples to apples.

3           A     Yeah.

4           Q     Would you say that your income as a Lawyer,
+ 5 as a professional, in the second half of your career,
+ 6 the past eight years, is significantly greater than
+ 7 your income was in the first eight years of your
+ 8 practice?

9                   MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to object to
+ 10 the question on the basis that it's vague.

11                   BUT can you go ahead and answer that
+ 12 question.

13                   THE WITNESS: THE answer is yes.

14 BY MR. LINK:

15           Q     Thank you for answering that.

16                   We were tal ██████ about some ethics issues
+ 17 and whether you had any, and I was asking you what
+ 18 you remember. Do you remember -- as we were talking
+ 19 about your reputation -- do you remember any
+ 20 incidents while you were working for the Broward
+ 21 State Attorney's office where anything that you did
+ 22 was called into question or there were any news
+ 23 reports or anything?

24                   MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. I am going to
+ 25 object. The question is vague and compound.

1 now being served with by Mr. Epstein.

2 Q Did I interrupt you?

3 A No. I will finish right there.

4 Q Good. I didn't want to interrupt you.

5 6 7 8 9 10 So, are you telling this jury that the three clients that you represented, the settleme that you obtained for them were somehow impa Q by your inability to fulfill your professiona obligations as a result of this counter -- this lawsuit being filed against you?

11 12 A No. I'm telling you c' what Jeffrey Epstein wanted to happen, b dn't let happen.

13 Q He failed; is xh ght?

14 15 16 17 18 A Look at th urn rs. He said it was a fabricated case. id millions of dollars for these allegedly fab that he pu,~in that complaint, which the jury is going to ge(tcor It was all a big, fat lie

19 20 21 22 23 So his intent was to shut you down and 0 make A SL t settle the cases, or to somehow give them way. He failed, because you, on behalf of your clients, got every single penny they deserved, didn't you?

24 A I did well for them.

25 Q (Y5174 FUra-dfirg(h-aTig(Tettre-d)(fh7r)n Cifi(you)

1 (didn't) believe (you had) reasonable settlements (for
+ 2 (them), would you?)

+

3 (A) (It was not my choice to settle the cases.) (It
+ 4 was my clients') choice.)

+

5 (Q) Of course.)

+

6 (A) (So you say I wouldn't have settled them.)
+ 7 (Look), (I would have rather tried all) three of them, to
+ 8 tell you the truth.)

+

9 (Q) Of course. (I know that now.)

+

10 (But you settled those three cases.) And as
+ 11 a member of this bar, you did not believe that your
+ 12 representation was somehow impacted by the filing of
+ 13 this complaint, did you?

+

14 (MR. SCAROLA:) Objection, compound.)

+

15 (THE WITNESS:) Thank goodness that Jack
+ 16 was there to help me defend against that
+ 17 (lawsuit), otherwise, MR. Epstein could have
+ 18 been successful.)

+

19 BY MR. LINK:

+

20 (Q) (But he wasn't, was he?)

+

21 (A) We made sure that my representation of my
+ 22 clients was not compromised because of his attempt to
+ 23 destroy my reputation.)

+

24 (Q) And that's what I was asking.)

+

25 (A) (I did a pretty good job with that.)

(Q) (Y 1.)(fulfilled)(your) }(TrTffETItVial)

(respo ns ib s)(En)(5511qa Clans)(Et)(your) (53=) (and)

(neqot la frd)(failfreftl eme n (or(Orin, (FiTTITE?)

@g 0(5elieve) so.

Q Good.

And focusing on this window of when yo are sued and when the counterclaim is filed, know of any press that ran a story about t lawsuit against Rothstein and Brad Edwa ds? It , OU ein

A And what I was getting a ore answering this question is, even when yo sking me questions about the press a iming of the press with respect to the Pon e I don't remember the chronology of any of ess or any of the news on any of these thi

ld hY.Te to look and see what was out there at at time to be able to answer that questi just don't remember.

0 Have you sought press from December 2009 d about your litigation with Mr. Epstein?

A If you could show me something to refresh my recollection, I will try to answer that question. I would do anything Mr. Epstein tried and I thought the possible to mitigate the damage that to cause. If the opportunity arose press could assist me in that

1 2 and that's to prove that this is false. That's why we are here still.

3 4 5 6 Q Only one way to come back from this you said. Come back from what? Your career has been more successful than ever since this lawsuit was filed, right?

7 8 9 10 A well, this kind of goes back to be . e people who really know me and know the out i g work that I do for clients and see -- I'm a ucc ssful lawyer in that way.

11 (1-2) (15) we 073 arreursamilwail5)0Nni7D , (Elie) gffirrivinwiTsnuffre)gva4 o 070ffrgffaaT)ffIig5) (fligf)(551Trgwant)EWPTID ion, @I74)(fhig) tbeiTiZUWITElt) (E1M5i)0WrieW057fl 4t TR7197R)EOffiTRDartilUTD are—tatIonship ha (15refaD(o)Onre7 0Rairig)051Trcf) ogp(because one (way) to do TL-Cs.

18 19 20 21 22 Sb, you're really bothered that 9 million 1 : 1445 ion en't called you? You just said these people aren't going to call you. Do you kink they were going to call you before the Epstein suit?

23 24 25 A The only thing that matters to you is not your reputation amongst your best friends. It's your reputation in the community as a lawyer.

1 2 3 4 Yes, it's general people. I care about people. And I care about what people think about me. The truth, not some false indictment against me.

5 6 7 8 9 10 Q Who do you think Mr. Epstein hurt more from a financial standpoint and from a pain and suffe i g and anxiety standpoint, you or the three cli th t you were representing while you were at th ey tein firm? Who's more the victim here? You three folks, sir? hose

11 12 13 14 15 A It's tough put me up ' -- it's not just those three victims. It's e Au dreds and hundreds of little girls that he's S1 t i over the years. I ( S0 mean, that's what he es n a day-to-day basis. That's what he's 'I doing, I'm sure.

16 17 18 19 20 So rti people is something that he will do i any way, shape or form. But the fact is, he tri4 to urt me in a way so that he could fr co ' u to hurt others and not have me call him out 0

21 Who's hurt more?

22 Q Yeah.

23 CID A OltrD(dif9TrfreMT)Ways. (Fle)(htflt)n rreTrut-gEITM) (morel(because)Q ) more) g\_D ® )anon u ) in (fire) (communit7,0 @ep (hi t)(them more) ii3hWi ry) (Mid)

1 0 (rona err aWd)(17a(causedD ow, certain (13regic) - MOestrovect7)

3 4 6 7 I think I'm a stronger person than some of them. I was older. I wasn't a 14-year-old little girl. It's just very hard. You're comparing apples and oranges. We have all been hurt to the maxim m degree possible. And that's always been his nt

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q So let's go back to 2009 and '10 ave you focus on my question. That was a od peech, se I appreciate that. But I aske whether the se hundreds that you didn't represent o thousands that you three folks you represented think exist, or whateve ink Mr. Epstein is doing today. You re se ed three individuals, correct?

16 A Yes. A at time, yes.

17 Q t tha time.

18

19 20 ASy And you settled all three of their Ot s, right?

21 Al ek A I did. They settled their lawsuits, yes.

22 O You were their lawyer, weren't you?

23 24 25 A I was. But I don't want you to make it seem like I chose to settle their lawsuits. My clients choose what they're going to do. They settled their

1 settled?

2 A No. No. I'm just trying to play into your
3 sociological experiment that you are trying to ask me
4 about.

5 Q I was just asking you to tell me --

6 A If I were a juror?

7 Q NO, SIR, YOU, AS THE PLAINTIFF IN THIS
8 CASE. (If YOU BELIEVE THAT THE HARM INFLICTED ON YOU
9 BY MR. EPSTEIN BY FILING HIS COMPLAINT IN
10 DECEMBER 2009 CAUSES YOU MORE ANXIETY AND SUFFERING
11 THAN WHATEVER HE DID TO THE THREE FOLKS YOU
12 REPRESENTED?

13 MR. SCAROLA: AND THAT QUESTION IS
14 argumentive. (IT'S NOT REASONABLY CALCULATED
15 TO LEAD TO THE DISCOVERY OF ADMISSIBLE
16 EVIDENCE. (IT'S THE FOURTH TIME YOU HAVE
17 ASKED IT. (IT'S BEEN ANSWERED. (I WILL
18 INSTRUCT YOU NOT TO ANSWER AGAIN.

19 BY MR. LINK:

20 Q When Mr. Epstein filed his complaint
21 against you in December 2009, did he issue a press
22 release?

23 A Other than to take the Fifth, he doesn't say
24 anything.

25 Q So my question was, did he issue a press

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 50-2009CA040 800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED],
individually,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN

Taken on Behalf of the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

DATE TAKEN: Friday, December 1, 2017
TIME: 9:23 a.m. - 11:21 a.m.
PLACE: Law Offices of [REDACTED] Pottinger, LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Examination of the witness taken before:

Iliana Lugo, Court Reporter
Palm Beach Reporting
1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
Suite 1001
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

1 2 3 4 looking at articles after August 2012 the fact that Mr. Scarola had publicly denounced what Mr. Epstein had done and said to the world that Mr. was free and clear of any taint or allegations essentially that Mr. Epstein brought?

6 MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to object to t e question as compound.

8 9 main point there. I was going to say, you kind of AC1 on the A.

10 BY MR. LINK: c

11 Q. Let me try it again.

12 13 14 it5 d ne direct quote. Do you So there are two t ts in here that are attributed to Mr. Scaro irS' agree with that?

15 A. Yes, gARrir

16 17 18 Q. And arola is making it clear that what Mr. Epste file against Mr. had absolutely no basis; rue

19 c l' y . Yes, that seems to be the point taken.

20 21 22 23 0 '41I L . And did you take into consideration when doing II ur Internet research that on August 17th, 2012 there was a public statement by Mr. ' lawyer that he had essentially been --

24 4127)(SCAROLA7) (Successfill)C)(dI gditinq)

(bli7)(EWEreari r etrartiM

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,

vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED],
individually,
Defendants.

VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

May 15th, 2013
10:00 A.M. - 12:20 P.M.

401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Stenographically Reported By:
WENDY [REDACTED], RPR
Notary Public, State of Florida
Empire Legal Support, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale Office
Phone: (954)241-1010

APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY(S) FOR MR. EPSTEIN:
TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE
Tonja Haddad, PA
315 SE 7th St Ste 301
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333013158
Phone: 954.467.1223
Fax: 954.337.3716
E-Mail: Tonja@tonjahaddad.com
FRED HADDAD, ESQUIRE
Fred Haddad PA
1 Financial Plz Ste 2612
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333940061
Phone: 954.467.6767
Fax: 954.467.3599
E-Mail: Haddadfin@aol.com
JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
Atterbury Goldberger Et Al
250 S Australian Ave Ste 1400
West Palm Beach, Florida 334015015
Phone: 561.659.8300
Fax: 561.835.8691
E-Mail: Jgoldberger@agwpa.com
ATTORNEY FOR BRADLEY EDWARDS:
WILLIAM [REDACTED] ESQUIRE
Scarcy Denney Scarola Et Al
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd
West Palm Beach, Florida 334096601
Phone: 561.686.6300
Fax: 561.684.5816
E-Mail: Wbk@scarcylaw.com

ALSO PRESENT: JEFF EPSTEIN, PLAINTIFF
DEBRA FEIN, LAW CLERK

INDEX

WITNESS: [REDACTED] Page
Direct Examination by MR. HADDAD 4

EXHIBITS
PLAINTIFFS:
EXHIBITS: Description Page
No. 1 part of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing Web site 93
No. 2 from the Web site 93
No. 3 from the Web site 93
No. 4 from the Web site 93
No. 5 from National Trial Lawyers Web site 93
No. 6 from AVVO, A-V-V-O 93
No. 7 from the [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing Web site 93
No. 8 from lawyers.com 93
No. 9 from for 40 under 40 93
No. 10 & 11 interrogatories directed to 93
Mr. [REDACTED] and responses
No. 13 transcript of the sentencing proceedings 93
for Alfredo Rodriguez
No. 14 plea agreement between the United States 93
and Alfredo Rodriguez.

1 Videotape Deposition taken before Wendy [REDACTED],
2 Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in
3 and for the State of Florida at Large, in the above
4 cause.

5 ---
6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the video
7 record. Today's date is May 15th, 2013. The time
8 is 10:17 a.m. This is the video deposition of
9 [REDACTED] taken in the matter of Jeffrey
10 Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Case
11 No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG.

12 We're located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard,
13 Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The court reporter is
14 Wendy [REDACTED], the videographer is Anthony Estevez,
15 both with Empire Legal.

16 Would counsel please state their appearances
17 for the record.

18 MR. [REDACTED]: William [REDACTED], Scarcy Denney Scarola
19 Barnhart & Shipley for Mr. [REDACTED].

20 MR. HADDAD: Fred Haddad on behalf of Jeff
21 Epstein.

22 MR. GOLDBERGER: Jack Goldberger, Atterbury,
23 Goldberger & Weiss on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.

24 MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: Tonja Haddad Coleman on
25 behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.

1 produced this time record. (With respect to reputation, 2 (I believe that over the course of the lasthi ),, 3 !have done a pretty darn good job resurrecting any damage. 4 (that was done to my reputation in this imnity. contr

5 Q Well, let's — let's start with that. You 6 don't -- you never had a reputation damage, did you? 7 MR. : Objection, form. 8 BY MR. HADDAD:

9 Q Okay. What damage, if any, did you initially 10 have done to your reputation by the filing of a lawsuit 11 against you that suggested that you were so aggressive 12 as a lawyer someone was going to sue you?

13 A No, the lawsuit that was filed against me — 14 MR. Object to form, argumentative.

15 A The lawsuit that was filed — 16 MR. HADDAD: I was paying a compliment.

17 MR.= Yes. 18 Go ahead.

19 A The lawsuit that was filed against me said 20 that I was part of some racketeering scheme, said that I 21 was involved in a Ponzi scheme, that I was 22 co-conspirator of Scott Rothstein's and that I was 23 committing fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. A 24 bunch of.criminal actions were alleged against me. In 25 fact, I think the complaint was entirely crimes that I

1 had committed as a lawyer, which is the exact opposite 2 of the type of reputation that you want as a lawyer.

3 With that being said, that complaint, the 4 various motions making those allegations about S some form of co-conspirator in a Ponzi sche 6 repeatedly filed and stated on the record anti 7 hallways over at the bankruptcy court, because e 8 lawyer who was anybody in South Florida had something to 9 do with the bankruptcy proceedings over at the 10 bankruptcy court. So I had to go over there 11 continuously and fend off these lawyers who believed 12 that there must be some merit to it, because somebody 13 who has a lot of money is hiring lawyers who have a 14 pretty good reputation to say these things, there's got 15 to be something to it.

16 BY MR. HADDAM—) 17 Q Name one case in which you were impleaded 18 because of your alleged involvement with Scott 19 Rothstein?

20 A I did not lose a single client. 21 Q Name one — no, name one person who impleaded 22 you, one other person in bankruptcy court, whether It be 23 the clawback scheme, whether it be Shears, whatever the 24 hell he calls what he did, whatever you call any of that 25 stuff; name one person that impleaded you or asked

you —joined you as party or a -- 1

A It didn't happen. Q — defendant or anything? A That did not happen. 2 3 4

Q Name one person, other than this lawsuit, which well get into later, other than this lawsuit, what newspaper article, what Daily Review article, what any article accused you of being involved in the Scott Rothstein debacle? 5 6 7 8

A I can't recite them off of my head. Q Is there any? 10 11

A I believe that newspaper articles were written when the lawsuit was filed about me and Scott being accused of being some to-comparator ina Ponzi scheme, yes. 12 13 14 15

Q All right. There.were newspaper articles written quoting a pleading as opposed to someone suggesting you arkttittgeolminal act; is that correct? 16 17 18 19

A I don't know thedistinction that you are trying to make. 20 21

Q We'll worry about that later, I'm just asking you; do you know whether or not it was someone quoting a 4newspaper-- a — a — a legal pleading, or was It a Indivridual making an accusation that you were a 22 23 24 25

44S , 'gb

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Q Pm asking you, was there anything other was there any person, reporter, anyone, any of the people you had all of these thousands of e-mails with, anyone who suggested that you were a criminal, other than the pleading filed that suggested because of Rothstein's inclusion of your cases as part of the basis for his Ponzi scheme that you were involved, other than that lawsuit?

12 A People believed that I was involved.

13 14 15 Q Who expressed that to you? You're a young lawyer, you're in the courthouse every day or almost every day, you're around town, correct?

16 A Yes.

17 18 19 20 Q You go to different restaurants. Name one person that came tip to you and said, I can't believe you are not in jail, you are a Ponzi scheme or you arc anything, name one person --

21 22 23 24 25 A There were lawyers over at the bankruptcy court, when I had to sit there listening to the things that were being said, that told me, you are going to be a target of mine given this information that we - that — that is being told to us by Jeffrey Epstein and

criminal?

A The legal pleading made an accusation that I was a criminal and that was reported on.

EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. (954) 241-1010

7 (Pages 25 to 28)

1 BY MR. HADDAD:

2 Q Well, let me ask you this: In --

3 A (Do I believe that right now my reputation is
4 better than it has been at any time in the past, yes!

5 Q All right. And as a matter of fact, since the
6 Rothstein case, you're now included, probably one of the
7 youngest guys there is, in Best Lawyers in America,
8 correct?

9 A Probably.

10 Q All right. There are not many guys that have
11 been practicing 11 years to be included in that.

12 A I agree.

13 Q And that is 100 percent for old people like
14 Goldberger, for the most part. You are included in that
15 based upon peer review and nothing else?

16 A That's true.

17 Q You --

18 A I mean, I don't ac -- actually don't know the
19 answer to that. I -- if you are saying that's what it
20 is, it might be.

21 Q Did you solicit anybody to become in that?

22 A No.

23 Q Did you receive a letter saying you have been
24 nominated for Best Lawyers in America?

25 A I don't think so.

1 Q No, you just got a notice one day that you --

2 A Right.

3 Q -- are included, correct?

4 A Right, that's true.

5 Q Out of the whole world, out of thousands of
6 lawyers practicing law 10 years, you are notified, hey,
7 you are one of the best lawyers in America for what you
8 do?

9 A Right.

10 Q Okay. Now, you also are one of the top 40
11 lawyers under 40, correct?

12 A Right.

13 Q You are 37 years old?

14 A Correct.

15 Q And you are considered one of the top trial
16 lawyers in Florida?

17 A Right.

18 Q There is a group called the Top 100 Trial
19 Lawyers in America, correct?

20 A I think so.

21 Q That's part of what you are in?

22 A Okay.

23 Q Yeah, they have the top 100 trial lawyers for
24 old guys like Goldberger, Scarola, part of his firm and
25 all those old people, correct?

1 A Maybe I should pay more attention to those
2 things. I don't know about all those old people.

3 Q Well, you do have -- I look at it from what
4 you do with them. Come on Brad, you have an ego,
5 everybody does. At any rate, you are considered in the
6 top 40 under 40, in that group, correct?

7 A Right.

8 Q And have you ever looked on the Web site for
9 that group to see the type of lawyers that are included
in that?

10 A No.

11 Q Okay. And you have that distinction of being
12 included and you promote it with your -- as most lawyers
13 would, correct?

14 A Personally, I don't, but I know that my law
15 firm does. I mean, we do have a PR firm for our law
16 firm.

17 Q [REDACTED] is that who does all of that stuff?

18 A Yeah.

19 Q I mean, this is about a month's worth. All
20 right.

21 A You looked at a lot more than I have.

22 Q I have to do something to earn the money I
23 make.

24 A Thank goodness, right.

1 Q Now, you are also -- there is another service
2 called AVVO, are you familiar with that?

3 A Yes.

4 Q All right. And that's another unsolicited --
5 out of the top 40 under 40, you can't buy your way into
6 that one either, you didn't know you were getting that,
7 correct?

8 A That's true.

9 Q You get a notice, hey, you have just been
10 included in all of this stuff, whether you like it or
11 not, you are considered one of the top lawyers in
12 Florida.

13 A That's true.

14 Q Okay. Then you have AVVO where people can
15 arrest -- arrest, I see arrest records, two secrets
16 under your name here. I guess that is part of the
17 advertising that goes with having a Web site or
18 something. Five [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing attorneys
19 recognizes the best lawyers in America, that is pretty
20 good for a bunch of young lawyers, yeah?

21 A Yeah.

22 Q And AVVO, another one. Do you participate in
23 their promotion, AVVO, they promote lawyers I think, do
24 you participate in that at all?

25 A Not really.

11 (Pages 41 to 44)

EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.
(954) 241-1010

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 me let you finish your question. A Donald Baker, is that the — MS. HADDAD EMAN: No, it's different. THE WITNESS: M, different. BY MR. HADDAD: Q M, you got sued twice? A Apparently. Q All right. And then did -- let me ask you about the -- I had it right here. A 1 convicted some guy, he went to prison and then sued the judge and every -- all the police and everything else. MR. GOLDBERGER: Here you go. MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: This guy's name Is different. MR. HADDAD: Yeah, Shaarbay, Sharbasom. I guess that must be — MR. GOLDBERGER: Spell it. MR. HADDAD: the Arab guy. S-H-A-A-R-B-A-Y versus — A News to me. BY MR. HADDAD: Q — various persons. Were you ever served with a lawsuit? Among the persons sued was — A No.

1 Q Pete Weinstein, Michael Gates, Finkelstein, 2 Satz, Dan Callahan, Brad =. 3 A No. I don't recognize that person's name. I 4 have never been served with that lawsuit, to my 5 recollection. 6 Q To your recollection, okay. 7 A No. 8 Q All right. But you said there est r 9 one, who else sued you? 10 A Donald Baker sued me and Mike Satz and Michael 11 Gates and all of the Hollywood Police Department. 12 Q And what happened with that case? 13 A It was dismissed. 14 Q All right. Would those predate the time that 15 you were sued by Mr. P4stein? 16 A Yes. 17 Q Okay. Now, tell me how — 18 A Well, don't know about this new one that you 19 just told me about it, it may have been yesterday for 20 all I know. 21 Q .right. 22 A I am unaware of it. 23 Q Emotional distress, embarrassment, mental 24 anguish, humiliation, I will start with those, because 25 we know loss of reputation and standing in the community

1 doesn't exist correct? 2 MR. =: Objection. 3 BY MR. HADDAD: 4 Q You concede that? 5 MR. Objection, argumentative. 6 BY MR. HADDAD: 7 Q Well, would you concede — never mind, we went 8 through it already. 9 A Yeah, we — we talked about this. 10 Q I understand. Can you detail for me the 11 emotional distress, embarrassment, mental anguish and 12 humiliation -- 13 A Okay. 14 Q —that you have? 15 A Where I was begin 16 Q Yes, sir. 17 A — when we wen talk dbout reputation. I 18 do believe that I have always racked with the utmost 19 honest, integrity. And when a lawsuit was filed against 20 me accusing me of being dishonest and being a criminal 21 or — to truncate this — and I had to continue to go to 22 court and see lawyers who, for a period of time, and I 23 do believe that once the case was dismissed against me, 24 that window closed, but for a period of time they 25f %ISieved , /the allegations against me. I think that there

sS, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 was probably a point in time, based on some of the e-mails that I have seen, that your co-counsel Tonja believed that, which in terms of hurt feelings type of things, yeah, that -- that wasn't — that wasn't something that I appreciated either. But having to be in a courtroom where lawyers believed that I had done these things that I had not done, it was humiliating. Now there is another aspect of it which I consider to be much more significant, because as we've discussed, the case was dismissed against me and I do feel that separate and apart from any involvement that I have had prosecuting cases against Jeffrey Epstein,(0 (have done a good job of resurrecting my reputation fap the point in time where people initially believed, hey) where there is smoke there is fire or something t his guy must be guilty of something.iliultl asmy perception of things and that's a reasonable perception based on what was filed. Q All right. And I don't want — I am not going to be argumentative with you, obviously, but based upon what the entirely of what the Ponzi scheme is, just being involved in it, just being in that firm with your cases there would give that perception to people, wouldn't you agree? A No. I think that most lawyers escaped fairly

EXHIBIT D

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND. FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE 502009dA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually,

DefendantS,

A fr, lis" i VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION N OF

.

VO IE OF II

110 - 250

( 2.) October 10th, 2013

10:00 A.M. - 2:30 P.M.

4\_;SD'.1 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400 Fort Lauderdale, FL

Stenographically Reported By: WENDY RPR Notary Public, State ol Florida Empire Legal Support, Inc Fort Laudetdale Office. Phone: 9.54)241-1010

EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.. (954) ,11-10.1.0

1 are you claiming?

2 MR. : You asked the same question last 3 time.

4 MR. HADDAD: I don't remember it. I thought 5 the last time we said you -- taking time away from 6 your family and that stuff for economica

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. : He went -- but he went o great detail, as you might recall, where t 1 ed about the fact that, you know, he would to the -- he would go over to the Courtho e nd lawyers would look at him, and his rep i. was -- was impacted by that and what -- wt1 h was truncate that lat able to do to

14 MR. HADDA P( Yo

15 BY MR. HADDAD:

16 Q Do y&i s111 maintain that stuff?

17 A (As (said then,)(have I done a aood job at)

18 19 (resurrecting whatever damage was done?) (Yes,)al(did) Is there) - fs there

20 21 22 23 ''I12, What was the -- what was the impact to you fr m supposed -- and I don't mean that pejoratively, damage to your reputation by being sued for being with Rothstein?

24 25 A Uh, what -- for being falsely accused of committing crimes I didn't accuse by Epstein.

2 3 4 5 6 If newspaper articles that were printed after the filing of the claim against me is something that would support that, then I guess to that extent, yes, but if you are asking about medical documents or anything like that, then the answer would be no. I'm not exactly sure what you are getting at but I

7 8 A Q Well, for example, you are claimi our reputation was injured. 511)

9 ARight.

10 11 12 Q And based on the elemen proof required to prove injury to damage to rep there are certain factors that you must meet 1SK k

13 ARight.

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Q I'm askin have any physical documentation or you've objected to all your financial info so I guess my question in plain English is: ow are you going to prove that you have any ki ecuniary -- pecuniary loss as a result of an 7<b y to your reputation if we don't have any is to back that up?

21 22 23 24 25 AI have not claimed an economic loss as a) (result of my reputation). Ihaven't. And the only thing that I can say to answer your question is, I know who has hired me. I will never know who would have hired me but elected not to because of what it was that they

Assr

EMPIRE LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. (954) 241-1010

EXHIBIT E

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

VOLUO 7

TRANSC <t TP PROCEEDINGS ?S H\

14 ...,

O4

DATE TA uesday, December 5th, 2017 TIME: 10:02 a.m. - 4:35 p.m. PLA 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida FORS: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

A46 :) This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aid, when and where the following proceedings were ; rted by:

Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

@ G @ G @ <O 0 入J 傘\* c一 一曲 一④ NNNNN

嘞。 似灌擂嚷;3 寫"1ategitp。<①"。關〉山田。H〉什@嘞 爵出什。<@村 dacncededbyEpteiri口禿姓阻 :i捷壙捷'酗\*捷喱 theren0cnceab1e桊2kth。佃eisue仂 6g5一胃。幂Q、5 已仂 什5口倒什""① 。咋 隱①口仂① 倒仂 毛①一 山仂 呂伯Q碧。g什較尸薛giOny什。 heexent 什5熬 5什@的什一 Q 一5黝什 一曲嘞 代=劍什 代=@曲. 作5幃.@ 甓一瑟"门『bea姒:: 什,。 。〉仂。 口一仙絮 d⑦, 什,⑦ <巴=。 。為 什了。仂⑦ 。Q仂⑦仂 竹。 咎⑦仂① 一2OrsWha對①<@" Q弓俾 ① 毛俾仂 。仙=仂①~ g ein aS a reu1t thereO啼.

2①倒門,倒嬰Q 什,倒什 一仂嘞什5倒什一繹J圓」"@陘"倫掃肋苕◎ 目 圖。"如.."忙"歸脚晌懇⑥·A圈A目 匍」一劍閘劉90目膣"U舊" U目且目0面幽鍘@ 目88 宕@叫弓H"什@9 目@籮g ⑦旱倫箇 困俐圖An1t迤g@.u~。髭霹。。三U甸」~蕩酬舄一 at1v迤圈85昌爵翥Ui 囪◎蚓U目昌圖劑圄8屠昌8回魁 驟⑨甲 圄偷側唰曲創u )O

So that's the clear unadulterated

EXHIBIT F

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

L

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS

DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017

TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m.

PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C

t Palm Beach, Florida

BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge

This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept)

Sonja D.

Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

limine in front of me at this juncture as to the 40 other -- or the 40-in-total alleged victims. There is not a motion in front of me regarding how far we are going to go with regard to the trial --

MR. LINK: Fair enough Judge.

THE COURT: -- in regard to the claim of the three litigants represented by 0 Mr.

C

MR. LINK: Your Honor is rcent right. I appreciate you in me to answer some of the ques at were on my mind. And I apprec

Where we wo like to go next, Your Honor, if th has time -- or we can take it up x time -- are those things that we the exhibit list and witness liecr

0 (One of the things we don't know, based)

+n

the rulings so far, is will E.W., L.M.) and Jane Doe be taking the stand, because) (that's part of the motion in limine, what we) (have been talking about.

THE COURT: (Are they listed as)

witnesses?

IMR. LINK:) Pardon me?

(THE COURT: (Have they been deposed?)

MR. LINK:) (They have not been deposed)

in this case.

THE COURT: (I presume they are listed)

as witnesses.

LINK:) (They are listed as)

witnesses.

IMR. SCAROLA:) (Your Honor, I'm sorry

12412. LINK:) (Were they deposed in this)

case?

(MR. SCAROLA:) was deposed.

(MR. LINK:) (I'm sorry.

IMR. SCAROLA:) (One of them was deposed)

(in this case just recentlyj

MR. LINK: (I thought that was -- ohj

(yes.) (You're right.) (Sorry about that.)

out of two.

, MR. SCAROLA:) (And the only one noticed)

+... () o be deposed.)

(MR. LINK T) (And that's an issue that yc.t)i

(told us to come back to you on, JudgJ

(because if they are going to be called -- I)

(don't know if they are -- but if they are)

(going to be called, then I would like the)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

&opportunity to depose those two.)

THE COURT: What I said somewhat

off-the-cuff, but not as articulate as the Second District Court of Appeal in the case of Liabos versus Harman -- L-I-A-B-O-S. Harman, H-A-R-M-A-N -- 215 So.2d 487, was what I intended earlier, just so that we a,0%4.1k all clear on the issue of probable caus least as it relates in this case in relatively quick word search.

It says, It should be oted that the lack of probable ca mixed question of law and CCtr I will omit the citation that to say, when the facts relied on to lack of probable cause are in disp a their existence is to be determi y the jury as a question of Their legal effect, on the other is determined -- to be determined by he Court, but only after these facts are admitted to found -- are admitted or found to be true.

MR. LINK: Yes. That's right. We are in complete agreement, which is, if the facts we say we relied on in bringing this

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763847/EFTA02763847.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763847/EFTA02763847.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c29f21731ff2d8d3d322d009cf0e189f6f20d4c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763847/EFTA02763847.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2025 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763847.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 46, + "chars": 68193, + "elapsed_seconds": 107.66, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANTrIEFFR Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 477.9764709472656, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 477.9764709472656, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OU", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 464.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 464.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 279.363037109375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 279.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 182.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 182.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 485.31600000000003, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 485.31600000000003, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DR. BERNARD J. JANSEN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 405.144, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 405.144, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 374.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 205.74 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 205.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 326.808, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 326.808, + 73.71000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND. \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 71.87469482421875 + ], + [ + 468.798583984375, + 71.87469482421875 + ], + [ + 468.798583984375, + 114.7210693359375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.7210693359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC So what 1 am going to do is this. Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders out as soon as possible after those hearings are done -- is that I am going to require motions to be filed + +IA copy of the Court's Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. EXHIBIT + +![](_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg) + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 2 of 8 + +> on a discovery issue-by-discovery issue, deposition by deposition, so as to find out several things. One, is the need to take that deposition and whether that need has been either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered subsequently to the commencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter on those days that I provided. If it cannot be demonstrated to the Court that these witnesses need to be taken solely as a result the Court's ruling, then those requests will be denied, because, again, we were set to try the case next week. + +\*\*\* + +So 20 some-odd deposition, unless they can be prov Cand shown to the Court as being required as a result of the rulings of the Court, will not be entertained. They should have been done before. Apd if not done before, I will need a reason for that as well. + +11/27/2017 Hearing Tr. at 12:11-25 and 13 + +2. Thus, Epstein has the burden that (a) the new depositions are required solely as a result of a recent Court rulint if so (2) that the depositions could not have been \_ taken before. Epstein's motion clearlyfailito meet either requirement, and therefore the motion should be denied.; + +# A. Epstein Has Been Aware of the Relevance of the Testimony of These Witnesses for Years and Could Have Deposed Them Long Before the Discovery Cutoff. + +3. atial matter, L.M. was a named defendant in this lawsuit filed by Epstein. Allega ing L.M.'s role in the Ponzi scheme and her fabricated claim are replete + +2 Excerpts of the November 27, 2017 hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit 'B'. + +3 Perhaps understanding thrU2Lipn's futility, Epstein spends the first four pages arguing about M' damages and, incredibly, accusing of using L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe for his own personal gain. As Epstein is all too aware, the only person who has forced these victims to do anything against their will is Epstein, and the suggestion that these victims have by now "put behind them" the atrocious sexual misconduct committed against them by Epstein is yet another example of Epstein's indifference to the permanent damage he inflicted on his child victims. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 3 of 8 + +throughout Epstein's Initial Complaint. Any suggestion that L.M.'s deposition is needed "solely" as a result of the Court's December 5, 2017 ruling is therefore absurd. + +4. Jane Doe is also named repeatedly throughout Epstein's malicious and baseless Initial Complaint, and she was also alleged to be pursuing claims agai p. that had "minimal" value. a' first witness list, filed June 30, 2010, listed all ims ofJeffrey Epstein as fact witnesses for trial, which of course included Jane Doe As c any argument that Jane Doe's deposition is needed "solely" as a result of a rece ruling is also absurd. + +5. Rather, Epstein was obviously well-aw vance of the testimony of L.M. and Jane Doe long before the Court's recent rulings. There i3 no need, however, to accept argument to that effect. Rather, the Court need only consider the fact that in August 2017 Epstein requested and received dates to take L.M. and Jane Doe's depositions in early October 2017 (before the discovery deadline) Epstein however, voluntarily chose not to set either witness for deposition. + +6. Thus, Eps early fails to meet the first requirement enunciated by the Court, that the depositio needed "solely" as a result of a recent ruling, and the Motion should be denied on tan ds alone. + +# B. Epstein's Prior Counsel Failed to Set L.M. and Jane Doe's Depositions, Despite Requesting and Receiving Dates for Their Depositions in August 2017. + +7. The Motion should further be denied because, although Epstein could have taken these depositions months ago, he voluntarily chose not to so. + +11. On August 16, 2017, Doe available on any date. conf iic ..,th he would make L.M., E.W., and Jane + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 4 of 8 + +8. Specifically, on August 2, 2017, Epstein's prior counsel requested deposition dates for L.M. and Jane Doe (the email also sought the depositions of E.W. and MM.). That same day, undersigned counsel's office responded via email and stated that dates were available in early October, and to call to clear specific dates for these depositions. + +9. On August 3, 2017, M, as counsel for L.M., E.W. e, stated that he would accept service of subpoenas for his clients' depositions. C + +10. On August 14, 2017, after some back and fo 1 exchanges, Epstein's prior counsel instructed undersigned counsel's office to hold S4 ,land 10/12 for depositions. + +12. Epstein then set Virgini deposition for 10/5 and E.W's deposition for 10/12. No depositions were set for, + +13. On September 7, Epstein unilaterally cancelled the 10/5 deposition of its had travelled to New York from Australia solely for purposes of sitting for the dbp Lion. 77 + +14. in failed to set L.M. and Jane Doe for deposition on 10/5, despite notice tha e could make them available on that date. + +15. As such, no depositions were taken on 10/5 + +16. Epstein also failed to take any depositions on 10/11. + +17. Instead, Epstein used only 10/12 to take the deposition of E.W. + +18. Thus, when the Court asks Epstein's counsel for the reason why L.M. and Jane Doe's depositions have not been taken, the answer is quite simple: because Epstein chose not to take them. A... + +### C. Epstein's Current Counsel Chose Not to Set Any Depositions Fri the Close of Discovery. + +19. After Epstein's prior counsel failed to use either the 10Co dates to take the depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe, his current counsel made efforts to wdness depositions prior to the November 24, 2017 discovery deadline. + +20. Specifically, on November 13, 2017 Epstein's dounsel requested deposition dates for a number of attorneys who had represented other Epstein victims. + +21. Notably, however, Epstein' burris91 counsel failed to request new deposition dates for either L.M. or Jane Doe. + +22. On November 1 dersigned counsel's office advised Epstein's counsel that it was available for depositions each day, apart from Thanksgiving, until the discovery cutoff on November 24th. Thus, Epstein could have set depositions on 11/14, 11/15, 11/16, 11/17, 11/18, 11/19, 11/20, 11/21, 11/22, or 11/24. + +23.2\sErThiein failed to set any depositions, whether of the attorney witnesses or of L.M. and Jane Doe, on the dates given. + +24. In total, Epstein therefore declined to use twelve (12) days provided by undersigned counsel to schedule the depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe prior to the discovery cutoff. As such, the only reason these witnesses have not been deposed, witnesses whose importance + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery +Page 6 of 8 + +Epstein has been aware of for years, is because Epstein affirmatively chose not to depose them. Epstein's current remorse over that litigation tactic certainly fails to meet the Court's requirements to reopen discovery, particularly on the eve of trial in this eight (8) year old case. + +### Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 12th day of JANUARY, 2018. + +![]()JACK/SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 7 of 8 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com C.) West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 AS C) Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLA Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 I Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. w.com + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linlcrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 8 of 8 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +A g 4s) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES +AND RE PRETRIAL STATUTION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' MOTION TO +RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and +being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Than the motion is granted to the +thene that wholesale additional discovery will not be +permitted but individual discovery requests may be attorned on a +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27 +day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()\* matter by matter basis and only if the discovery requests are +reproached by the court's rulings on motions currently +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. +pending to be heard on Nov. 29, Dec. 6 & 7, 17. Joint pre- +trial statution shall be prepared and filed no later than +June December 15, 17. + +lads. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire 441Aak scarolateam@searcylaw.com West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Scatty Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +J. Esquire staff.efile@patlitojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ?\*> Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +iS 4)9 + +: 1 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt ateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A." 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 334Q1 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for BradleyJ. Edtvards + +N + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice©Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara linkrocklaw.com: Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +1• + + dv. Epstein 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 <4;\* Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein marc@nuriklaw.com CC" iS C/) ) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +Case No. 502009CA0408000000000000 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, +vs. +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +████████████████████ individually, +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS + +DATE TAKEN: Monday, November 27th, 2017 +TIME: 9:01 a.m. - 9:27 a.m. +PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C +West Palm Beach, Florida +BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Sonja D. ██████████ +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 471-2995 + +1 MS. ROCKENBACH: Good morning, Your +2 Honor. + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. +4 THE COURT: Good morning. + +5 Thank you for sending me the legal +6 issues that need to be addressed and the +7 anticipated amount of time that you are +8 going to need. I appreciate that. + +9 This motion I have before me is to +10 reconfirm and ██████████ opposition to the +11 existing pretrial deadlines, which were set +12 in contemplation of the case going to trial +13 in December. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Almost, sir. +15 THE COURT: Pardon? + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Almost. Your Honor has +17 it backwards. It is Mr. ██████████ who is +18 seeking to reconfirm the deadline. +19 Mr. Epstein is objecting to that +20 reconfirmation. + +21 THE COURT: My error. Sorry about +22 that. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: That's all right. A +24 mistake that we all make repeatedly. + +25 THE COURT: Mr. ██████████ is seeking to + +1 APPEARANCES: +2 For Plaintiff: +3 LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +4 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +5 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +6 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE + +7 For ████████████████████ +8 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & +9 SHIPLEY, P.A. +10 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +11 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +12 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +13 By DAVID P. VITALE, JR. + +1 confirm or reconfirm the existing deadlines, +2 Mr. Epstein is objecting. Okay. +3 All right. So I guess the place to +4 start is from Mr. ██████████ standpoint as the +5 punitive plaintiff here. Is there any +6 discovery that's necessary from your +7 standpoint at this juncture? +8 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. + +9 THE COURT: Ms. Rockenbach? +10 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. If +11 you recall, your order that granted the +12 motion to continue sets forth in it -- which +13 is November 14th -- that both parties don't +14 know how the Court will ultimately rule on +15 critical issues, which will require counsel +16 to try to strategize and plan their +17 respective cases under extreme uncertainty +18 and duress. And that was a quote from your +19 order, which you correctly identified. +20 And as a result, Your Honor opened up +21 additional days on your calendar so that we +22 could hear those incredibly significant +23 dispositive legal motions that are pending. + +24 We are going to be before the Court on +25 Wednesday, and then next week, on + +1 Keeping these deadlines in place. 2 freezing this Case in the position that it • was in on the eve of trial and ready to be 4 tried is the Only way t0 prevent those kinds • of last -alnute delays. + +O There has been an avalanche of notions 7 that have already been filed, but we have plenty of tine now to dispose Of those notions. And St there is a reasonable basis to upon disposition of those motions for Your Honor to consider on a ease-by-case basis - it and that's the only way it should be done, i) an extension of a deadline or an exception 14 to a deadline then Kr. Kihrtein, through IS his very able Ofmn\$441, has every means by IS which to present those issues on a I7 Case-by -case basis to the Court. Rut the re deadlines previously set should be enforced. + +It Thank you. Your Manor. 20 WI. ROCKIIMBACH: Your Honor, I want to 21 try this case on March 13th. + +22 THISCOURT: We are going t0 try the 23 case on Marts 13th. + +24 MS. ROO01/111ACM: There's no question 21 that both parties are respecting this + +Court's order on November 17th set 2 specifically. but as Your Hone identified, these critical 4 t0 be ruled en by this + +And Mr. Scarola raising the three clai 7 previously represented 4 cases. That's this Court will 10 deretOlbe whether t Mr. • ttled their significant issue that e 6n on Wednesday to heir testimony is even + +11 13 IS It + +It IT la It 21 21 22 2) 24 2\$ + +a 5 to So this case -- there are no additional notions to be filed. your Honor hat that all, in addition to the responses. Mat we do need Is to proceed In an orderly fashion and allow these deadlines to be reset in Conformance with a standard pretrial order for a march 13th trial setting. + +IS la la IS ts 17 10 THE COURT: Thank you. My intention was not the floodgates to allow wh le ry, as pointed out, and not reap wasn't So much the Court's 1 but respective counsel's vacat 1 s, which took up essential] bee where I wasn't able to s anyth substantively during that pert. d to thereafter wait. + +20 use there IS tine that opens up and Or at least counsel that ted Mr. Epstein in the past - - Choy Ily were amenable to setting things getting hearings set if the Court had time open. Mr. Seareda and his office have + +see that we're getting a preview fabrication issues. Rut I look to Wednesday and disCuNing it with court. + +The attorneys that Mr. Scorch identifies as designated for yeast, they were not. They were fact witnesses and only recently identified as expert witnesses, so appropriate discovery was propounded and their depositions were requested. + +The new expert that has lifted -- brand-new expert -- is being deposed this Friday, which incidentally le past the discovery cut-off date. I think he IS Again, it's a 2009 case. I know the counterclaim was filed a little bit later than that, but it is an old case -- has an appellate history -- that needs to get tried in March. + +14 + +IS Is 17 JO if 20 21 22 23 25 So what I an going to do is ChM. Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders Out as soon as possible aster those hearings are done -- is that I an going to require motions to be filed on a discovery issue-by-discovery issue, deposition by deposition, so as to find out several things. One, is the need to take that deposition and whether that need has Nen either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered submequently to the Commencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter en those days that I provided. + +was in Europe and that was the date that was provided. Re contradicts answers to interrogatories about damages. + +always been very accommodating in that regard. + +So it was not with the anticipation that we are going to open the floodgates for discovery to essentially recommence. + +cannot be demonstrated to the • Court that these witnesses need to be taken solely as a result the Court's ruling, then those requests will be denied, because, £ again, we were set to try the use next 6 week. + +7 And but for the legal issues that remained and the fact that the Court did not • want to put anyone's back against the wall, le including itself, in the short period of 11 time that we had between trial and the 12 hearings that had been set, and those were 13 just for a One-day period and not enough 14 time it vas not contemplated that IS discovery was going to be open again, at 16 least on the wholesale basis. + +17 .80 20 sae-odd deposition, unless they I. can: He.proven and shown to the Court as 49 being required as a result of the rulings of 20 the Court, will not be entertained. They ki should have been done before. And if not 22 dome before, I will need a reason for that as well. + +24 MS. ROCKENRACH: Thank You, Your Honor. 23 And so for clarification, that motion + +4 7 or the disco,. Court's fuling7 that Your Honor is referencing filed after Your Honor's ruling& November 29th or December December 7th7 THE COURT; Kea s that will be filed after t Cour rulings relative to whether or no thine deponents occasioned by the + +17 IS Is And as tar as the pretrial — the joint trial stipulation, Tour Honor, my point In that was not knowing how the Court will rule on critical issues requires -- it causes extreme uncertainty with regard to the issues CO be tried. + +ZO 21 22 22 24 2\$ Mr. Sterols -- Mr. filed a unilateral pretrial stipulation. I as going to ask the Court to allow us to reconvene following the hearings that are pending before and scheduled before Tour Honor so that we can arrive at a joint pretrial + +ROCK : Correct. + +Correct. we don't blow • II going to be as of yet. + +. ROMSMIACN: Thank you. + +• 2 stipulation. Those issues are going to be significantly impacted by the Court's legal rulings. + +7 9 111 11 12 12 24 22 I6 17 IS 19 20 Joint prattle/ stipulation is on - was due. In our response to unilateral pretrial stipulation, we noted that based on the feet that Your Haler is going to be making significan legal rulings on November 29th, December 5th December 7th, it was frame the issues to There are Mandl Honor is going Wednesday allowed hearings as to his case. ons that Tour on probably on at Is that we be tional time following those vane and arrive at a joint stipulation. + +21 22 COURT: All I can say is the • of malicious prosecution are well Out in Florida law. + +1 witnesses to testify as to those !saws Shouldn't be an extraordinary tasks at this point in time. + +4 • 10 11 12 11 IS What I was going to say is I recognise that those lists might be tailored in accordance with the Court's rulings, but It shouldn't hold back -- just like pending notions in limine that are In every case, subsequent to either filed or filed before or after the pretrial is filed and heard. And it may reduce, Increase or whatever the number of witnesses, but it wouldn't change the issues that have to be tried as It relates to a malicious prosecution action. + +7 + +la + +Is 17 la IS 20 IC. ROCICERBACH: I would tend to agree with Your Honor. However, the recent filings by Mr. show that perhaps there are a mixing or misunderstanding of those legal elements as compared to a defamation case. + +SI + +22 23 24 21 So I think this will be cleared up on Wednesday when your Honor Sees our motions, hears our arguments, and substantively rules on the pending reel issues to be tried. And + +VIE COURT: I'm sorry. I didn't follow that. + +MS. ImcsiENSACH: I'm sorry. + +MS. ROEMEMACM: Agreed. + +THE COURT: And so anticipating \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/EFTA02763893.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/EFTA02763893.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4e7750f543cd68c96efd9c3b7e613284ebf87c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/EFTA02763893.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1022 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 29129, + "elapsed_seconds": 48.02, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 112.86309814453125 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 112.86309814453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL E.W. TO \nANSWER QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND \nTO REOPEN DISCOVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 529.1239013671875, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 529.1239013671875, + 370.863037109375 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 370.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WI THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 540.015380859375, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 540.015380859375, + 122.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 122.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO \nREOPEN DISCOVERY TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 467.6231994628906, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 467.6231994628906, + 371.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 371.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Motion Fails to Meet the Court's Requirements to Reopen Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 494.27337646484375, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 494.27337646484375, + 481.85302734375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 481.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein Has Been Aware of the Relevance of the Testimony of These Witnesses for \nYears and Could Have Deposed Them Long Before the Discovery Cutoff.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 521.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 521.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein's Prior Counsel Failed to Set L.M. and Jane Doe's Depositions, Despite \nRequesting and Receiving Dates for Their Depositions in August 2017.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 607.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 607.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Current Counsel Chose Not to Set Any Depositions Fri the Close of \nDiscovery.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 245.60302734375 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 245.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.012, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 337.21200000000005, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 337.21200000000005, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 276.012, + 232.46999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 354.4582824707031, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 354.4582824707031, + 149.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 149.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 133.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES AND RE PRETRIAL STATUTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.084, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 502.45199999999994, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 502.45199999999994, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 96.084, + 389.61 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 353.91851806640625, + 187.11 + ], + [ + 353.91851806640625, + 201.89208984375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 201.89208984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 204.12 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 182 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 317 + ], + [ + "Line", + 147 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 342 + ], + [ + "Line", + 162 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763893" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed1f5e3793d6583540526497699d409a268ceadf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763893/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:391ab6fe410ba4cd1e075fd07a4c1c29ee16755d427696617ea64193a399b7e8 +size 8218 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4548413b93d5ece0e45aa50d40931a30d1697c39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.md @@ -0,0 +1,488 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA04080OOOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +cos + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPS'NkS OTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY TO AICUEPOSITIONS + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. tzylOpdrjuough undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Oppositions to Je 's Motion to Reopen Discovery to Take Depositions, and as grounds therefor t follows: + +### 1., The Motion Fails to Meet t Court's Requirements to Reopen Discovery + +1. On November 27, 2017, the Court entered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines', in which the Court ruled that additional discovery will only be permitted if "'the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's rulings on motions currently pending to be heard on November 29'h, December e and 7'h." At the hearing preceding the Order, the Court outlined the standard by which any such additional discovery requests would be considered: + +> So what I am going to do is this. Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders out as soon as possible after those hearings are done -- is that I am going to require motions to be filed + +A copy of the Court's Order is attached hereto as Exhibit `A'. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 2 of 8 + +> on a discovery issue-by-discovery issue, deposition by deposition, so as to find out several things. One, is the need to take that deposition and whether that need has been either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered subsequently to the commencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter on those days that I provided. If it canno be demonstrated to the Court that these witnesses need to be takets i elv as a result the Court's ruling, then those requests will b I because, again, we were set to try the case next week. As . + +St\* + +So 20 some-odd deposition, unless they can be prov shown to the Court as being required as a result of the rulirrfihe ourt. will not be entertained. They should have been done before. And if not done before, I will need a reason for that as well. y 7 + +11/27/2017 Hearing Tr. at 12:11-25 and 13. + +2. Thus, Epstein has the burden i that (a) the new depositions are required solely as a result of a recent Court M. (2) that the depositions could not have been taken before. Epstein's motion cl- o meet either requirement, and therefore the motion should be denied.3 + +# A. Epstein Has Been Aware of the Relevance of the Testimony of These Witnesses for Years and uld Olive Deposed Them Long Before the Discovery Cutoff. + +3. i • ial matter, L.M. was a named defendant in this lawsuit filed by Epstein. Allegations ding 1..M.'s role in the Ponzi scheme and her fabricated claim are replete + +2 Excerpts of the November 27, 2017 hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit 'B'. + +3 Perhaps understanding the Motion's futility, Epstein spends the first four pages arguing about damages and, incredibly, accusing of using L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe for his own personal gain. As Epstein is all too aware, the only person who has forced these victims to do anything against their will is Epstein, and the suggestion that these victims have by now "put behind them" the atrocious sexual misconduct committed against them by Epstein is yet another example of Epstein's indifference to the permanent damage he inflicted on his child victims. + +"minimal" value. Epstein as fact w' 4. Jane Doe is also named repeatedly throughout Epstein's malicious d baseless Initial Complaint and she was also alleged to be pursuing claims against that had first witness list, filed June 30, 2010, listed all tims of Jeffrey r trial, which of course included Jane As s , any argument that Jane Doe's deposition is needed "solely" as a result of a rece ruling is also absurd. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 3 of 8 + +throughout Epstein's Initial Complaint. Any suggestion that L.M.'s deposition is needed "solely" as a result of the Court's December 5, 2017 ruling is therefore absurd. + +5. Rather, Epstein was obviously well-aware vance of the testimony of L.M. and Jane Doe long before the Court's recent rulings re o need, however, to accept la argument to that effect. Rather, the Court nee o I sider the fact that in August 2017 Epstein requested and received dates to take L.M. and ane Doe's depositions in early October 2017 (before the discovery deadline).Epstein, however, voluntarily chose not to set either witness for deposition. + +6. Thus, Epst rly fails to meet the first requirement enunciated by the Court, that the depositi needed "solely" as a result of a recent ruling, and the Motion should be denied on ds alone. + +# stein's Prior Counsel Failed to Set L.M. and Jane Doe's Depositions, Despite Requesting and Receiving Dates for Their Depositions in August 2017. + +7. The Motion should further be denied because, although Epstein could have taken these depositions months ago, he voluntarily chose not to so. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 4 of 8 + +8. Specifically, on August 2, 2017, Epstein's prior counsel requested deposition dates for L.M. and Jane Doe (the email also sought the depositions of E.W. and . That same day, undersigned counsel's office responded via email and stated that dates were available in early October, and to call to clear specific dates for these depositions. + +9. On August 3, 2017, as counsel for L.M., E.W. Jane Doe, stated that he would accept service of subpoenas for his clients' depositions. + +10. On August 14, 2017, after some back and fort .1 exchanges, Epstein's prior counsel instructed undersigned counsel's office to hold 1 5, 0 and 10/12 for depositions. + +11. On August 16, 2017, confi AStok e would make L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe available on any date. + +12. Epstein then set Virgini berts S\I deposition for 10/5 and E.W's deposition for 10/12. No depositions were set fo + +13. On September 7, Epstein unilaterally cancelled the 10/5 deposition of had travelled to New York from Australia solely for purposes of sitting for the depccion. + +14. ps i in failed to set L.M. and Jane Doe for deposition on 10/5, despite la notice t FyCould make them available on that date. + +15. As such, no depositions were taken on 10/5 + +16. Epstein also failed to take any depositions on 10/11. + +17. Instead, Epstein used only 10/12 to take the deposition of E.W. + +18. Thus, when the Court asks Epstein's counsel for the reason why L.M. and Jane Doe's depositions have not been taken, the answer is quite simple: because Epstein chose not to take them. + +## C. Epstein's Current Counsel Chose Not to Set Any Depositions Prio tt rhe Close of Discovery. + +19. After Epstein's prior counsel failed to use either the 10/ dates to take the depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe, his current counsel made efforts to ess depositions prior to the November 24, 2017 discovery deadline. /frk + +20. Specifically, on November 13, 2017, Epstein's counsel requested deposition dates / for a number of attorneys who had represented o X. victims. + +21. Notably, however, Epstein\_sbuti t counsel failed to request new deposition dates for either L.M. or Jane Doe. + +22. On November 20 undersigned counsel's office advised Epstein's counsel that it was available for depositions each day, apart from Thanksgiving, until the discovery cutoff on November 24th. Thus, Epstein could have set depositions on 11/14, 11/15, 11/16, 11/17, 11/18, 11/19, 11/20,11721 11/22, or 11/24. + +23 stein failed to set any depositions, whether of the attorney witnesses or of L.M. and Jane 1 1-4/4e, on the dates given. + +24. In total, Epstein therefore declined to use twelve (12) days provided by undersigned counsel to schedule the depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe prior to the discovery cutoff. As such, the only reason these witnesses have not been deposed, witnesses whose importance + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 6 of 8 + +Epstein has been aware of for years, is because Epstein affirmatively chose not to depose them. Epstein's current remorse over that litigation tactic certainly fails to meet the Court's requirements to reopen discovery, particularly on the eve of trial in this eight (8) year old case. + +## Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery of denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the fo oing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of JA-0 2018. + +JACK: 'O A + +Flori ar No.: 169440 + +DA r P. VITALE JR. + +Flo 's a Bar No.: 115179 + +(.... AttOrney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and , mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery +Page 7 of 8 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 8 of 8 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Co s + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████ individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES +AND RE PRETRIAL STIPULATION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon ██████ J. ██████████ MOTION TO +RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and +being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Than the motion is granted to the +thene than wholesale additional discovery will not be +permitted und individual discovery requests may be allowed on a +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27 + +day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()\* Matter by matter basis and only if the discovery requests are +impacted by the court's rulings on motions currently +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. +pending to be heard on Nov. 29, Dec. 6 & 7, 17. former pre- +trial stipulation shall be prepared and filed no later than +Jan December 15, 17. + +Miladv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CM-10800X X X XMRAC Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Phone: (561) 686-6300 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA C O 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +4. 41Ic + +3. ME Esquire staff.efile®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +"S 94A) + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs©FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt eLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for Brad10)0. + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberge gA%pa.eom; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Aufttalian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linIcrocklaw.com; Tanya©Iinkrocklaw.com; tina@ilinkrixklaw.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +Case No. 502009CA040000XXXX + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, +vs. +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS + +DATE TAKEN: Monday, November 27th, 2017 +TIME: 9:01 a.m. - 9:27 a.m. +PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C +West Palm Beach, Florida +BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Sonja D. ██████████ +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 471-2995 + +1 MS. ROCKENBACH: Good morning, Your +2 Honor. + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. + +4 THE COURT: Good morning. + +5 Thank you for sending me the legal +6 issues that need to be addressed and the +7 anticipated amount of time that you are +8 going to need. I appreciate that. + +9 This motion I have before me is to +10 reconfirm and ██████████' opposition to the +11 existing pretrial deadlines, which were set +12 in contemplation of the case going to trial +13 in December. + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Almost, sir. + +15 THE COURT: Pardon? + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Almost. Your Honor has +17 it backwards. It is Mr. ██████████ who is +18 seeking to reconfirm the deadline. +19 Mr. Epstein is objecting to that +20 reconfirmation. + +21 THE COURT: My error. Sorry about +22 that. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: That's all right. A +24 mistake that we all make repeatedly. + +25 THE COURT: Mr. ██████████ is seeking to + +1 APPEARANCES: + +2 For Plaintiff: + +3 LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +4 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +5 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +6 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE + +7 For ██████████: + +8 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & +9 SHIPLEY, P.A. +10 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +11 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +12 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +13 By DAVID P. VITALE, JR. + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +1 confirm or reconfirm the existing deadlines, +2 Mr. Epstein is objecting. Okay. + +3 All right. So I guess the place to +4 start is from Mr. ██████████' standpoint as the +5 punitive plaintiff here. Is there any +6 discovery that's necessary from your +7 standpoint at this juncture? + +8 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. + +9 THE COURT: Ms. Rockenbach? + +10 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. If +11 you recall, your order that granted the +12 motion to continue sets forth in it -- which +13 is November 14th -- that both parties don't +14 know how the Court will ultimately rule on +15 critical issues, which will require counsel +16 to try to strategize and plan their +17 respective cases under extreme uncertainty +18 and duress. And that was a quote from your +19 order, which you correctly identified. + +20 And as a result, Your Honor opened up +21 additional days on your calendar so that we +22 could hear those incredibly significant +23 dispositive legal motions that are pending. + +24 We are going to be before the Court on +25 Wednesday, and then next week, on + +Keeping these deadlines in place, freezing this case in the position that it was in on the eve of trial and ready to be • tried is the only way to prevent those kinds of last-minute delays. + +6There has been an avalanche of motions 7that have already been filed, but we have ▪ **plenty of tine now to dispose of those notions. Md if there is areasonable basis 10upon disposition of those motions for Tour Il Honor to** consider On acase-by-case basis -- II and that's the only way it should be done. 13an extension of adeadline or an exception to a deadline -- then Mr. Epstein. through IS his very able counsel, has every means by 16which to present those Issues on a 17case-by-case basis to the Court. But the 16deadlines previously set should be enforced. + +It Thank you, Your Honor. 20Ma. ROCKEHBACH: Your Honor, I want to 21try this case on March 13th. + +22THE COURT: We are going to try the 23case on March 13th. + +24MS. ROCKENBACH: There's no question 2\$ that both parties are respecting this + +Is Md Mr. Scarola ken my ~521f 1n raising the three cla eta t t Kr. Edwards previously represented ettled their cases. That's significant issue that this court will le on Wednesday to determine whethe r testimony is even relevan + +:1 I4 If Isee at we're getting a preview about the fabrication issues. But I look forward to Wednesday and discussing It with the court. + +16 17 Is IP 20 21 The attorneys that Mr. Scarola identifies as designated for years, they were not. they were fact witnesses and only recently identified as expert witnesses, so appropriate discovery was propounded and their depositions were requested. + +22 22 24 25 She new expert that Hr. EMI has listed -- brand-new export -- is being deposed this Friday, which incidentally is past the discovery cut-Off date. I think he + +Court's order on November 17th set specifically. But as Your Mono identified, these critical i)salea -t to be ruled on by this C + +3 + +6 + +14 Is Ia 1/ is It 20 21 22 + +was In Europe and that was the date that was provided. He contradicts Mr. ISM answers to Interrogatories about damages. + +So this case -- there are no additional notions t0 be filed. Tour Honor has then all, in addition to the responses. What we do need Is to proceed in an orderly fashion and allow these deadlines to be reset in conformance with a standard pretrial order for a March 13th trtel setting. + +THE COURT: Thank you. 74y intention was not nthe floodgates to allow wholes& ovary, as pointed out, and not really wasn't SO nuch the Court's schedu but respective counsel's vacation sch ua, which took up essential y-e month of time where I wasn't able to s tanything substantively during that pert id to thereafter wait. + +use there Is tine that opens up end or et least counsel that ted Hr. Epstein In the past -- they 2sally were amenable to setting things time open. Mr. Scarola and his office have getting hearings set if the Court had + +1 2 + +4 + +always been very accommodating in that regard. + +So it was not with the anticipation that we are going to open the floodgates for discovery to essentially recommence. + +Again, it's a 2009 case. I know the counterclaim was filed alittle bit later than that, but it is an old case -- has an appellate history -- that needs to get tried in March. + +So what I an going to do is this. Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders out as soon as possible after those hearings are \*One -- is that I an going to require notions to be filed on adiscovery issue-by-discovery Issue, deposition by deposition, so as to find out several things. One. is the need to take that deposition and whether that need hat, been either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered subsequently to the cormencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter on those days that I provided. + +3 5 If it cannot be demonstrated to the Court that these witnesses need to be taken solely as a result the Court's ruling, then Ulnae requests will be denied, because, again, we were set to try the case next week. + +le II 12 '3 34 is 14 An0 but for the legal issues that remained and the fact that the Court did not want to put anyone's back against the wall. including itself, in the short period of tine that we had between trial and the hearings that had been sot. and those were lust for aone-day period and not enough time -- it was not contemplated that discovery was going to be open again, at least on the wholesale basis. + +le lf 20 31 22 23 So 20 some-odd deposition, unless they can be proven and shown to the Court as being required as a result of the rulings of the Court, will not be entertained. They should have been done before. And if not done before, I will need areason for that aa well. + +24 25 NS. ROCKENHACH: Thank you, Your Ho And so for clarification, that notion + +1 2 2 that Your Honor is referencing filed after Your Honor's rUl November 29th or December S + +S December Ttht THE COURT: Mean any sdYahs that will be filed after t Court rulings relative to whether or se deponents or the discon occasioned by the Court's ruling? + +10 11 IS : Correct. . Correct. We don't know hat >< going to be as of yet. + +17 Ie It W3CKENBACIP Thank you. es far as the pretrial -- the joint \*trial stipulation, Your Honor, my point in that was not knowing hobo the Court will rule on critical issues requires -- it causes extreme uncertainty with regard to the issues to be tried. + +20 21 fa 2) 24 23 Mr. Scarola -- Hr. filed a unilateral pretrial stipulation. Iam going to ask the Court to allow us to reconvene following the hearings that ant pending before and scheduled before Your Honor so that we can arrive at a joint pretrial + +2 1 stipulation. Those issues arm going to be significantly impacted by the Court's legal rulings. + +4 MS. ROCKENSACH: I'm sorry. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 IS le 17 34 19 20 Joint pretrial stipulation is die - was due. in our response to Mr. unilateral pretrial stipulation. we noted that bend on the fact that Your Honor is going to he making signielcan legal rulings on November 29th, December December Tth, it was I rus t0 frame the issues to ain is case. There are pendi lens that Your Honor is going l on probably on Wednesday. t is that we be allowed ltionat time following those hearings ne arid arrive at a joint stipulation. + +21 22 COURT: All I can fay is the of malicious prosecution are well out in Florida law. + +TIC COURT; I'm sorry. I didn't follow that. + +143. ROCKINBACM: Agreed. + +MCDUFF: And so anticipating + +1 2 2 witnesses to testify as to those issues shouldn't be an extraordinary tasks at this point in time. + +6 1 a 10 11 11 l) le eS What I was going to say is I recognize that those lists might be tailored in accordance with the Coutt'S rulings, but it shouldn't hold back -- just like pending notions in 'indite that are In every Case, subsequent to -- either filed or filed before or after the pretrial is filed and heard. And It may reduce, inc 44444 or whatever the number of witnesses, but It wouldn't Change the issues that have to be tried as it relates to amalicious prosecution action. + +is 17 le 20 rI MS. MINIVIHDACH: I would tend CO agree with Your Honor. However, the recent filings by Mr. show that perhaps there ace a mixing or misunderstanding of those legal elements as compared to a defamationCM. + +22 23 24 25 SO I think this will be cleared up on Wednesday when Your Honor sees our motion,. hears our arguments, and substantively rules on the pending real issues to be tried. And \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cc5a71b43c39f956572c253459bb86d09b2cffe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912/EFTA02763912.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,780 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763912.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 24398, + "elapsed_seconds": 119.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPS'NkS OTION TO \nREOPEN DISCOVERY TO AICUEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 464.7596435546875, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 464.7596435546875, + 358.863037109375 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 358.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1., \nThe Motion Fails to Meet t Court's Requirements to Reopen Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 441.361572265625 + ], + [ + 491.2090148925781, + 441.361572265625 + ], + [ + 491.2090148925781, + 467.60302734375 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 467.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein Has Been Aware of the Relevance of the Testimony of These Witnesses for \nYears and uld Olive Deposed Them Long Before the Discovery Cutoff.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 530.6567993164062, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 530.6567993164062, + 518.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 518.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "stein's Prior Counsel Failed to Set L.M. and Jane Doe's Depositions, Despite \nRequesting and Receiving Dates for Their Depositions in August 2017.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0709228515625, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0709228515625, + 601.9335174560547 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 601.9335174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Current Counsel Chose Not to Set Any Depositions Prio tt rhe Close of \nDiscovery.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 244.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 244.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 338.1449890136719, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 338.1449890136719, + 229.863037109375 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 229.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 128.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES AND RE PRETRIAL STIPULATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.92, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 504.288, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 504.288, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 97.92, + 385.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 351.9646911621094, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 351.9646911621094, + 200.012451171875 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 200.012451171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 199.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 409.86 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 409.86 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 184 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 904 + ], + [ + "Line", + 150 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 869 + ], + [ + "Line", + 177 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763912" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..697ca880fbd4dbe093a18e998282c476144d612b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.md @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800LVOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +# Defendant, A. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION F It LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. S by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Jeffrey E iein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness, and as grounds therefor states as fo V ot): + +#### , .s The Motion Fails to Meet Court's Requirements to Reopen Discovery + +1. On November 27, 2017, the Court entered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines, in which the Court ruled that additional discovery will only be permitted if "the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's rulings on motions currently pending to be heard on November 29'h, December 6ih and 7th." At the hearing preceding the Order, the Court outlined the standard by which any such additional discovery requests would be considered: + +> So what I am going to do is this. Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders out as soon as possible after those hearings are done -- is that I am going to require motions to be filed on a discovery issue-by-discovery issue, deposition by deposition, so as to + +> find out several things. One, is the need to take that deposition and whether that need has been either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered subsequently to the commencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter on those days that 1 provided. If it cannot be demonstrated to the Court that these witnesses need to be taken solely as a result the Court's ruling, then those requests will be denied, because, again, we were set to try the case next week. Atia.c + +> So 20 some-odd deposition, unless they can be provennwn to the Court as being required as a result of the rulings of the Court, will not be entertained. They should have been done before. Analinot done before, I will need a reason for that as well. + +\*\*\* + +11/27/2017 Hearing Tr. at 12:11-25 and 13:1-6 + +2. Thus, Epstein must establish that D ~e Bmith III's ("=") proposed expert testimony is required solely as a result of went urt ruling. Epstein's motion clearly fails to meet this requirement, and therefore t should be denied. + +- A. The "Legal Ethics and Responsibility" Related to the Discovery Conducted in to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Cases Has Been at Issue Since 2009. +- 3. The first of D. Culver III's (`=") proposed expert testimony is "legal ethics and sibility," which can only relate to the legitimacy of the discovery conduct nts' sexual molestation cases.' + +&#x27; With less than two (2) months before trial and although the deadline for the disclo ure of expert opinions has long passed, still has no idea what opinions has formulated. Despite repeated requests, not one of opinions has been disclosed, and thus this is merely an assumption based on a general reference to areas may discuss. + +4. Obviously, the propriety of this discovery has been at issue since December 7, 2009, when Epstein filed this malicious lawsuit claiming, inter alia, that he had somehow been damaged by ' litigation conduct in those cases (despite the absolute litigation privilege). In fact, the Court need look no further than Epstein's `Summary of Action' in the Cy aint, which includes the following allegations: + +Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers . . . at the of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A., for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations to the administrative of justice . . . conductIedl egregious civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious injury to Jeffrey Epstein . . . The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil litigation strategy that was unrelated to the merits or value of their clients' cases . . . As a result, Epstein was subject to abusive investigatory tactics, unprincipled media attacks, and unsitpoortable legal filings. . . . + +5. Specific allegations conce wards' purported litigation misconduct are replete throughout the December 7, mplaint. See, e.g., ¶ 35 (alleged improper pursuit of flight logs); ¶ 36 (alleged imp per 4 sitions of pilots); ¶ 38 (alleged improper scheduling of depositions of well-kno + +6. Thirt ny p ported expert testimony concerning litigation strategy and conduct in thethireesvictims' cases (assuming it has any relevance in light of the litigation privilege) has been—at issue since 2009. No recent ruling of the Court has impacted in any way on this proposed new testimony, and would be highly prejudiced in having to depose less than two months before trial. While the details of proposed opinions have yet to be described, in all likelihood they would give rise to a need to conduct additional discovery, and potentially retain a competing expert. This Court has been clear that this case is going to trial + +March 13, 2018, and the attempt to muddy the waters with an expert whose testimony relates to issues that have been contested since Day One of this case should be seen for what it is: an attempt to manufacture the need for yet another continuance of this case. A + +#### B. Epstein Has Been on Notice of the Attorney Witnesses Sin tti 0. e + +7. To the extent is intended to rebut testimony o unretained and unpaid attorney witnesses who may provide expert opinion as to ropriety of litigation conduct in the underlying victim cases, Epstein h intent to call these witnesses since at least 2010. + +8. Specifically, witness • the years have included the following disclosures: + +#### a. June 30 2t 10 W' + +"All attorney( urrep prosecuting claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims." + +### b. June 25.20 itness List) + +attorneys currently prosecution claims against Jeffrey Epstein on Qpt i(iehalf of other victims" and "Robert Josefsberg, Esquire" + +#### + ember 27. 2013 (Amended Expert Witness List) + +"Experts include all listed attorneys involved in the prosecution of civil claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females. They will testify based upon their background, training and experience as civil litigators and the personal involvement that each had in prosecuting claims against Jeffrey ia about the legal and ethical propriety of the actions taken by in fulfilling the obligations to the victims of Epstein's criminal assaults." + +#### d. January 6, 2014 (Amended and Supplemental Witness List) + +"All attorneys currently prosecution claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims" and "Robert Josefsberg, Esquire" + +"Experts include all listed witnesses involved in the prosecution of civil claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females." + +#### e. January 6, 2014 (Amended Expert Witness List) + +"Experts include all listed attorneys involved in the p!osedution of civil claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females. They will testify based upon their background, training and experience as civil litigators and the personal involvement that each had in prosecuting claims against Jeffrey Epstein, about the legal and ethical propriety of the actions taken by Bradley Edwards in fulfilling the obligations to the victims of Epstein's criminal assaults." + +## E Aggust 15, 2016 (Second men and Supplemental Witness List) n eg + +"All attorneys c behalf of ysecution claims against Jeffrey Epstein on ims" and "Robert Josefsberg, Esquire" + +"Experts inclu isted witnesses involved in the prosecution of civil claims riggtnst Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females." + +9. Tltb 1meys who were obviously known to Epstein since the day he was served with civil s, were nevertheless individually named in subsequent witness lists. There can therefore be no claim that Epstein was not aware that these witnesses were expected to testify, and he has had years to take discovery related to their expected testimony. Tellingly, heh as never attempted to depose even one of them. + +#### C. Whether Probable Cause Existed (an Issue in This Case Since at Least 2011) is a Question of Law for the Court. + +10. The parties agree in their Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation that, absent a disputed material fact, whether Epstein had probable cause to initiate or continue his claims against "is an issue of law to be determined by the Court." + +11. Florida law is clear: "An expert should not be allowed to tf nceming questions of law." Edward]. Seibert, A.LA. Architect & Planner, P.A. v. ach & Tennis Club Assin, Inc., 573 So. 2d 889, 892 (Ha. 2d DCA 1990) citing De n v. of Hollywood, 351 So. 2d 1022, 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Thus, p inions on whether probable cause existed are improper and irrelevant. + +12. And, again, whether Jeffrey Epstei e cause to initiate and continue his malicious claims against has been anissueig this case for years, and specifically pled a count for malicious prosecution Amended Counterclaim (October 4, 2011), Second Amended Counterclaim (Novemb ), Third Amended Counterclaim (May 21, 2012) and Fourth Amended Counterclaim 9, 2013). + +13. Epstein th had, at a minimum, six (6) years to take discovery on the issue of probable cause pi the discovery deadline on November 24, 2017. Any prejudice for his failure to do so is entirely self-inflicted. + +#### dwards Has Pled Reputational Damages in Every Counterclaim in this Case. + +14. Epstein has been on notice of reputational damages claim since December 21, 2009, when filed his initial counterclaim. Moreover, reputational damages were pled in the Malicious Prosecution counts in Amended Counterclaim (October 4, + +2011), Second Amended Counterclaim (November 29, 2011), Third Amended Counterclaim (May 21, 2012) and Fourth Amended Counterclaim (January 9, 2013). + +15. Any discovery related to this issue could, and should, have been conducted years ago. Once again, any claimed prejudice is entirely self-inflicted. + +**Conclusion** + +For the foregoing reasons, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 16th day of JANUARY, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6457cf71c440d8e3f9a27088afdadad248e0d3b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926/EFTA02763926.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,649 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763926.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 12236, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Defendant, A. \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION F It LEAVE TO DISCLOSE \nEXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 273.9927978515625 + ], + [ + 530.50634765625, + 273.9927978515625 + ], + [ + 530.50634765625, + 358.10302734375 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 358.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ",\n.s \nThe Motion Fails to Meet Court's Requirements to Reopen Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 440.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 490.8067626953125, + 440.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 490.8067626953125, + 466.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 466.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein Has Been on Notice of the Attorney Witnesses Sin tti 0. e", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.70623779296875, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.70623779296875, + 244.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 244.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. June 30 2t 10 W'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 438.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 438.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. June 25.20 itness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 285.3366394042969, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 285.3366394042969, + 507.85247802734375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 507.85247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "+ ember 27. 2013 (Amended Expert Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.62000274658203, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 398.2166442871094, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 398.2166442871094, + 576.8524932861328 + ], + [ + 101.62000274658203, + 576.8524932861328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. January 6, 2014 (Amended and Supplemental Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 148.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 148.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. January 6, 2014 (Amended Expert Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 378.828, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 378.828, + 272.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 272.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E Aggust 15, 2016 (Second men and Supplemental Witness List) n eg", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 390.3515625 + ], + [ + 473.8109436035156, + 390.3515625 + ], + [ + 473.8109436035156, + 410.9830627441406 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 410.9830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Whether Probable Cause Existed (an Issue in This Case Since at Least 2011) \nis a Question of Law for the Court.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 539.317626953125, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 539.317626953125, + 686.6835174560547 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 686.6835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "dwards Has Pled Reputational Damages in Every Counterclaim in this Case.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 541.65283203125, + 573.48 + ], + [ + 541.65283203125, + 588.8035125732422 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 588.8035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 298.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763926" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..deff151de3f2a5be46a2e79ebaee3d5221f71290 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +r0 4 + +## ORDER GRANTING/DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on January 17, 2018, upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTE 4'4e etta..--AsenAc 11144,4;tAi 7 ,ar 17W\_p + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm t ach nty, Florida this /7day of January, 2018. + +> THE HONO ONALD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT C GE + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Ro

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7341a6e184c7318dcab0f03475d0377cfb48fc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935/EFTA02763935.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763935.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 5154, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING/DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 498.223876953125, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 498.223876953125, + 349.863037109375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 349.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 155.60302734375 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 155.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763935" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01750f3b6daec913683e42f49ce634f52efecb96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCCIATRTIjariaividually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## /-• ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ( REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LI1VIINE SF REFERENCES TO CASES NOT LITIGATED BY + +case + +THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on December 7, 2017, upon Section D of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") seeking to exclude references to any cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,'J.a C [D.E. 1070.] The Court, having reviewed the Motion and\_' Response [D.E. 1089], having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties may speak generally about the number of claims that Ere was facing at the time he initiated, and during his continuance, of this proceeding against The details, the merits and what may have been discovered in cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted by will not be admissible into evidence, subject to the Court's reconsideration at trial as the evidence is presented. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:25-5:24.) , however, will be permitted to discuss generally, without testifying about any specific + +case or claim, his leadership role in coordinating the prosecution of all of the claims. (12/7/17 Tr. + +6:1-24.) + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 16 +day of January, 2018. + +![]()Copies provided to: + +SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Trov@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Trov@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8b330bb960ba4620ebce072b30f1cff77e08041 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937/EFTA02763937.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763937.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4972, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.51, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "/-\u2022 \nORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \n( \nREVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LI1VIINE SF\nREFERENCES TO CASES NOT LITIGATED BY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.95000457763672, + 315.0302734375 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 315.0302734375 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 364.0470275878906 + ], + [ + 110.95000457763672, + 364.0470275878906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 332.90999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763937" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62d4256b0a0a710c5d03081a8fc00461b3fda305 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LIMINE SECTION C (DEROGATORY ADJECTIVES] + +THIS MATTER came before the Cou Icing on November 29, 2017 (11/29/17 Tr. 143:19-159:24) and December 5, 2017 Adjectives) of the Revised Omni Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") [D. filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. 202:11-203:3), upon Section C (Derogatory in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant e Court, having reviewed the Motion and the Response ) [D.E. 1089], having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: + +1. The Motion is GRANTED as to the use of derogatory adjectives. At trial, shall refrain from using any derogatory adjectives when referring to or referencing Jeffrey Epstein, including referring to him as a "billionaire pedophile" or "convicted child molester." The parties are further ordered to refrain from making any pejorative comments at trial. + +2. The Motion is DENIED as to the June 30, 2008, written Plea entered by Jeffrey Epstein, a copy of which was presented to the Court and filed by Epstein on December 6, 2017. [D.E. 1107, Ex. B.] The Court finds that the written Plea is admissible and may be admitted into evidence at trial. + +3. The Court defers ruling on the admissibility and use of Epstein's sex, offender registration, for purposes of showing assets for the punitive damages phase, if any, or any other reason. The parties are directed to fully brief that issue and set the matter for hearing. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach nty, F o this ./ C day of January, 2018. + +Copies provided to: + +THE HONORABLE ALD AFELE CIRCUIT COURT JU GE \\ N87 / + +## iCt61/tRVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 men@searcvlaw.com jsxOsearcvlaw.com scarolateamasearevlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 nisaFLAnnellateLaw.com kbt(ThFLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or Defendans/Counter-PlainUff + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE OF COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df2752f39febade6ebab5eea5eaf26759b76b35f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940/EFTA02763940.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763940.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6024, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.66, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nREVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LIMINE \nSECTION C (DEROGATORY ADJECTIVES]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.32999420166016, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 490.824, + 363.3070373535156 + ], + [ + 111.32999420166016, + 363.3070373535156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "iCt61/tRVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.37998962402344, + 448.5302734375 + ], + [ + 342.4390563964844, + 448.5302734375 + ], + [ + 342.4390563964844, + 462.6770324707031 + ], + [ + 234.37998962402344, + 462.6770324707031 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763940" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d77fc3e4fa0dcf4e23734b6e11aaa90b581ba86 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.md @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MOTTO TN LTMINE SECTION 13 TRIAL EXHIBITS) + +THIS MATTER came before the Court h ring on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, upon Section B ( Trial Exhibit I) of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Ale ? filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") (D.E. 1070). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the Response filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. ) (D.E. 1089), having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: + +&#x27; Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine was directed at Amended Exhibit List dated November 9, 2017. D.E. 1043.) On December 7, 2017, after two ays of hearing and substantive Court rulings, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109) identifying 79 new items and modif ing some o his earlier disclosed exhibits. This Order only addresses the exhibits identified on November 9, 2017, Exhibit List. To the extent any exhibit numbers have been replaced with different items or new numbers have been added, those will be subject to a separate Order after the appropriate motion and hearing. The rulings set forth herein for all exhibits disclosed on December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List that have not been modified will remain unc tango . + +I. On or before December 20, 20171= shall produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial with the exception of Exhibit No. 113 which is addressed separately in paragraph 2 below. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219, 226, 228.) + +2. On or before January 5, 2018, shall produce to Epstein the t itle court filings to be used as trial exhibits from the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedin ane Does #1 and #2 v. United States of America, U.S. District Court, Southern District o ase No. 08- 80736-Civ-Mara) designated as Trial Exhibit No.,,113. shall not produce each and every item identified on the Court's docket, baishil cull out the specific items t he intends to use at trial. The Court hereby sustains Epstein's objection to Exhibit No. 113 as being overbroad. The Court will revisit this ruling if Edwards narrows the documents he intends to introduce at trial. (12/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14) + +3. As set forth in more detail'below, the Court has sustained Epstein's objections to a number oa' trial exhibits. Those objections will be sustained unless there is a showing at trial that the exhibits are relevant and material to the issues to be determined. For example, exhibits may be admissible if they iFtItto three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc), if they relate to issues concern wa s' preparation and evaluation of his clients' cases, or for any other reason enunc t e Court on the record at the November 29, 2017 and December 5, 2017 hearin ose instances, will be allowed to speak generically about the facts surrounding those exhibits, but will not necessarily be allowed to introduce the exhibits at trial without further Order of the Court. The Court will make decisions on an item-by-item basis at the appropriate time. Any discussions relating to an exhibit to which an objection has been sustained shall be conducted outside the presence of the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24; 198:19-199:5.) + +4. As set forth in more detail below, the Court defers rulings on Epstein's objections directed to-' trial exhibits concerning Epstein's net worth and in support of punitive damages claim. The Court will address these objections at the appropriate time. (12/5/17 Tr. 163:17-164:15.) + +5. The Court makes the following specific findings: + +OS LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS: I —All Objections 2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed dan of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or n .resentation of cumulative evidence 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 9— Other (please identify basis 64tobj ion) 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 10 — Completeness II — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Counsel for Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper exhibit 14 — Trade secrets/Confidential + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|--------------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------------| +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes | 3,4, 7, 11, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3,4,7, II, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 3. | Photos an information of Jeffrey Epstein's | | | +| | homes, flilanes and automobiles | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | 11/29/17 Tr. 160:6-162:15 | +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 11/29/17 Tr. 162:16-167-9 | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 11/29/17 Tr. 167;11-13 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------| +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | I 1/29/17 Tr. 167:14-170:9 | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, I I, 14 | 11/29/17 Tr. 171:22-176:9 | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | I I/29/17 Tr. 176:10-187:8 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 64:8-81:17: 85:11-22 | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, lam | 12/5/17 Tr. 81:18-82:17: 146:14- | +| II. | phone records | 3,4 8J0,4 7' 1 14 | | +| | | ,--, \ 14/ | | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs e c | , 7, 8, II | | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file Alcict,„.e. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 150:4-152:11. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits hated criminal | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 152:14-153:13 | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24 | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's | | | +| | | 3, 4, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 160:25-161:21 | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant ofJeffrey | | | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent | | | + +In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Video of Epstein Property Inspection 01/18/10." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 162:25-164:15
Deferred | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 163:4-5; 164:16-19
Sustained | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:20-24
Sustained | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:25-165:5
Deferred | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16;
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home 3 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | 12/5/17 Tr. 166:15-24
Sustained | + +3 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29)." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | [REDACTED]' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 167:7-168:16
Sustained in part and overruled in part. The impact upon the issues as to preparedness, knowledge, as far as Mr. [REDACTED] is concerned – his diligence as to discovery – if those are called into question, then this exhibit may be discussed. The actual documents themselves are excessive and would be getting into other matters that would not be germane to [REDACTED]' three clients and, therefore, may not be used until discussed outside the presence of the jury | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 168:17-175:1
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If [REDACTED] had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, this file may come into play. The sheer amount of the criminal file would also be relevant to Mr. Epstein's state of mind at the time he filed the underlying Complaint. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury. | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-179:25
Deferred | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-180:5
Deferred | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13,
The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | 12/5/17 Tr. 180:23-181:12
Deferred | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 188:23-192:17
Deferred | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 192:18-22
Deferred | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13.
This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | 12/5/17 Tr. 192:23-193:2
Deferred | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 193:3-194:22
Deferred | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 194:23-195:1
Deferred | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:2-195:15
Deferred | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14, 12
(as to cars and boats) | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:16-18
Deferred | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:19-196:2
Deferred | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:3-19
Sustained | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victims 4 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:20-197:2
Sustained | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:3-23
Sustained | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:24-198:10
Sustained | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:8
Sustained | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:9-25
Sustained | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:4-18
Not Produced
Reserved ruling because documents not available | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:19-22
Sustained | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:23-24
Sustained | +| 59. | Massage Table 5 | 3, 4, 12 (document marked as No. 59 is not a massage table) | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:25-201:21
Sustained | + +4 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(CW & SR) 07/09/2008." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +5 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/25/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------|----------------|-------------------------------| +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8 | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/I 7 Tr. 201:22-202:8 | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 202:9-203:4 | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, | | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 204:3-11 | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's ,\ | "1, | | +| | | 7; 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 205:13-15 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Ba slie | | | +| | Krischler L | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr, 205:16-22; 206:2- | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein, | | | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207;15-209:9 | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9 | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9 | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9 | + +6 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report ate 07 19/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems' appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------------------| +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, I0 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9 | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 209:10-12: 210:6-21 | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | | | +| | / | 4 | | +| | | „c ) | | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for — | | | +| | ( c s. | | | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, | | +| 79. | Documents related to Moray searches ofJeffrey | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:1-4 | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:5-7 | +| 81. | Police report regarding picking up | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:8-15 | +| | money dated 11-28-04 | | Sustained | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:16-213:1 | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 213:2-214:8 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3,4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:9-11 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, I2, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:12-20 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------| +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:21-24 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, II | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1 1 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3 | +| 89. | Flight information for | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.re Maria | 3, 4, 7, 8, 110, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:6-8 | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | 3, 4, 12 (document | | +| | | what is i | of | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 51h Amendment Speech | | | +| | | ? Se | | +| | | 3, 4,4 „) | | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06 | 3,4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:21-216:14 | +| 95. | Police Repo dated | -28-04 3,4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:15-17 | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:18-217:8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter7 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:9-10 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:11 | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee | | | +| | | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:12 | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:13-15 | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:16-24 | + +In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "to 09/03/08." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists 8 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(items not provided) | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:25-218:2
Sustained | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:3-10
Sustained | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:12-17
Sustained | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:18-22
Sustained | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:22-23
No ruling; catch all | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits | 12 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 109. | ██████████ reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 110. | ██████████ reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, ██████████ is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to ██████████ objections. | Not an exhibit | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by ██████████ Edwards on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14
Sustained because of breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice to specific documents being produced as set forth above. Specific documents must be culled out; all documents on the docket may not be identified; ██████████ must narrow scope | +| 114. | ██████████ Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto, and all Undisputed Facts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 226:15-227:14
Overruled | + +In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "and/or Property Receipts." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 227:15-229:17
Overruled. ██████ is ordered to produce/cull out within 15 days, if the documents have not already been produced | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 229:18-20
Deferred | +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 229:21-24
Deferred | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 229:25-231:5
Deferred | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
(duplicative of Exhibit No. 8) | 12/5/17 Tr. 231:6-9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statement. | +| 121. | Photo depicting ██████, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 231:10-18
Sustained | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 231:19-20
Sustained | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10
duplicative of 45 | 12/5/17 Tr. 231:21-232:4
Deferred | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009 | | Not addressed at hearing | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ ██████ Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012 | | Not addressed at hearing; no objections | +| 130. | Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | Not specifically addressed at hearing but duplicative to Exhibit No. 115 and those rulings are incorporated herein | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile | 3, 4, 7, 8 | Not specifically addressed at hearing, but deferred with Exhibit 63 | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 232:5-235:9
Deferred | +| 133. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition 9 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 134. | All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 135. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | 12 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 136. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 137. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 138. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 139. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 140. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | 12 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 142. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action | 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach C rida this day of January, 2018. + +> THE HONORAB HAFELE CIRCUIT COURT J + +9 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, has shifted Exhibit Nos. 133 through 142 to Exhibit Nos. 209 through 218. has also identified new exhibits at Exhibit Nos. 133 through 208. This Order does not make any rulings on the new exhibits which may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +Copies provided to: + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43ee525cd857054b82b6ae3517873a8e804ebcac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943/EFTA02763943.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,596 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763943.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 60497, + "elapsed_seconds": 17.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nREVISED OMNIBUS MOTTO TN LTMINE \nSECTION 13 TRIAL EXHIBITS)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.70000457763672, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 363.3070373535156 + ], + [ + 111.70000457763672, + 363.3070373535156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 236.51999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 76 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 152 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 163 + ], + [ + "Line", + 77 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 153 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763943" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11ea81b4820a50f3d7012d5c09554431e6b103a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.md @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +Complex Litigation +Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201- Civil – Div. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Judge: AG – David ██████████ + +SUBJECT: THE CLERK +PRINTED AT THE COUNTY +CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +2010 AUG 23 PM 2:25 +FILED + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S** +**MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF JURY TRIAL** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files his Motion for Continuance and in support thereof states as follows: + +1. The Plaintiff commenced this action on December 7, 2009. The complaint seeks damages based on an illegal Ponzi scheme to market investments to outside investors in the lawsuits brought by a number of plaintiffs, represented by the now defunct law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A.,("RRA") against the Plaintiff in this case. + +2. Even though the case was technically at issue, on April 5th 2010, the Defendant ██████████ prematurely moved to set this matter for jury trial. + +3. On April 15, 2010, this Court set the case for a jury trial on the eight-week docket beginning October 25, 2010, with a docket call on October 15, 2010. + +4. There have been no prior trial settings or continuances of trial settings for this case. + +5. This case is not ready and cannot be ready to be tried on its presently scheduled trial docket. The Plaintiff has set forth below his reasons why the case cannot be ready for trial for its presently set docket. Pursuant to Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.545(e), the Plaintiff has consented to this Motion for Continuance, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". + +6. RRA is under the jurisdiction of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida. In those proceeding, the Plaintiff has sought the production of records from the Bankruptcy Trustee which has custody of records that are material to the Plaintiff's claims in this case. On August 13, 2010, Raymond B. Ray, Judge of the Bankruptcy Proceeding ordered the appointment of a special to review the estimated 6000 or more docume privilege claims and production. Defendant Edward's present law firm, Jaffe ing, t Fistos and Lehrman, were present and argued a motion for protective o ier i py of Judge Ray's Order is attached as Exhibit "B" to this motion. Retired Broward CoNtrttiCircuit Judge Robert Carney has begun the process of reviewing the documenting initial arguments on the privilege issue. + +7. The Plaintiff needs to obt'iSkl., unprivileged documents and depose knowledgeable witnesses to properly prepare for trial. The documents are crucial to the Plaintiff's -\_\_- / preparation of his claim. It is hiehJ li ely the Plaintiff will be able to obtain these records in time for the Plaintiff to conduct awssetessary discovery in order to be ready to try this case on its presently set docket. + +8. The. PI tiff anticipates that after receiving and reviewing these records that amendmentile\his-61eadings will need to occur. + +9. , While a default has been entered against Defendant Rothstein, there is a pending motion to set aside the default together with a motion to strike the affidavit of Mr. Rothstein, seeing to set aside the default. If the court sets aside the default, the case will no longer be at issue. + +10. Defendant frequently invoked the privileges of work product and attorney client for his answers to his deposition, which require a ruling by the court. Further if the documents from the Bankruptcy trustee are produced, Defendant needs to be deposed on those documents. + +11. Initial sets of discovery requests have been propounded by the Plaintiff and Defendant to which objections have been made and a court ruling will need to be made. + +12. The Plaintiff anticipates at this time that the number of witnessesz ay have relevant unprivileged knowledge of the issues in this case are likely to excee ty-five people. It is not possible realistically to depose these people until the reco ewed from the Bankruptcy Trustee and all privilege claims are resolved. + +13. The Defendants will not be prejudiced by t Continuance. ing Plaintiffs Motion for + +14. The filing of this Motion is ma fr4g4faith and not for the purposes of delay. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey E tern, and through his undersigned counsel requests this Court to enter an Order grantin ion for Continuance and striking this case from the Jury Trial Docket presently set i this m ter on the eight week docket beginning October 25, 2010 for the reasons stae td a bo + +# ( c k I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true apd correct copy of the foregoing has been duly fumis via email, O Facsimile, tE U.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this &August, 2010 to: + +Fartner, Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Cos + +L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. + +901 Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +**CONSENT OF PLAINTIFF,** +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO MOTION** +**TO CONTINUE TRIAL** + +**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Fla. R.Jud.Admin. 2.545 (e), gives his consent to a Motion for Continuance of the Trial of this matter, presently set for the eight-week jury trial docket beginning October 25, 2010. + +DATED this 16 day of August, 2010. + +![]()![](_page_4_Picture_27.jpeg) + +![](_page_5_Picture_97.jpeg) + +**ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 13, 2010.** + +*Raymond B. Ray* + +Raymond B. Ray, Judge +United States Bankruptcy Court + +**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION** + +[www.flsb.uscourts.gov](http://www.flsb.uscourts.gov) + +IN RE: + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF +DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on August 4, 2010 upon (i) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.E. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party [REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos and Lehrman, P.L. ("[REDACTED], Jaffe") (D.E. #818) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, + +![](_page_5_Picture_110.jpeg) + +## DOES HEREBY ORDER: + +1. The Court appoints former Broward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney as Special who shall work with counsel for the Trustee to obtain documents responsive to the subpoena served upon the Trustee by Jeffrey Epstein to: (i) review all electronically stored information ("ESI") and other documents in the Trustee's possession, including Qtasklidata for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad M, and other current or former clients of Farmer, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a\_ privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law. — + +2. Prior to engaging in this document reviev4he tat shall meet with counsel for Epstein, counsel for Jaffe and counsellor yt e Trustee to hear their respective positions concerning these matters. Upon completion of the review by the Special the Special shall prepare and file a ppaglege log with the Court. No documents or ESI shall be released to anyone until such Special has notified the Court that he has concluded his review of the r nsi el0ocuments and is in a position to report to the Court his findings and to obtain f er instruction. Upon the filing of such notice by the Special the Court shall se • conti ed hearing on the pending motions identified above. All legal fees and costs int o ad b e Special shall be paid by Epstein, who has agreed to pay directly all such Ms. + +# + +## Submitted by: + +Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A., 350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 glichunan@ bergersingerman.com + +## Copy furnished to: + +Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. (Charles H. Lichtman is directed to serve this Order to all parties of inter Certificate of Service.) + +C.) s,e \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b514b7f66d8857a683056a8c7897549785dc88b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/EFTA02763958.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,505 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 9268, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.72, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_27.jpeg", + "_page_5_Picture_97.jpeg", + "_page_5_Picture_110.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 518.3779999999999, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 518.3779999999999, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 78.57000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.49699999999999, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 437.647, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 437.647, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 164.49699999999999, + 298.89 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "( c k I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.5399932861328, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.3902587890625, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.3902587890625, + 522.72802734375 + ], + [ + 150.5399932861328, + 522.72802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.81199999999998, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 409.11800000000005, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 409.11800000000005, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 191.81199999999998, + 336.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.60199999999998, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 426.114, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 426.114, + 478.71 + ], + [ + 173.60199999999998, + 478.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DOES HEREBY ORDER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.90199999999999, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 239.97531127929688, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 239.97531127929688, + 105.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 112.90199999999999, + 105.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Submitted by:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.696, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 147.50531005859375, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 147.50531005859375, + 104.1920166015625 + ], + [ + 77.696, + 104.1920166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copy furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.696, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 168.1358642578125, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 168.1358642578125, + 233.9420166015625 + ], + [ + 77.696, + 233.9420166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763958" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_4_Picture_27.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_4_Picture_27.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c742fa1bd238eaf96def4a58762f880623675fa8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_4_Picture_27.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7afeefcb048a58d322b7abb9373a4cad5e82a3606a89ffcac788ba4891ab161a +size 7243 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_110.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_110.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..217ca52b66e5f036ff69371aab5ef076759cd659 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_110.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:90fe8830fa9596fc506d771f6fd424b37ac4de3417ed2a75c0bb24213b7afb70 +size 6835 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_97.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_97.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..facc5a95288d83fed6d3242bba60bbe4736cb486 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763958/_page_5_Picture_97.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2c94672258246517c131643db4efcf5d20f62ff15d6fda3335ff362d059ea811 +size 13854 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..577f5209f818da1fdb85cd69e837a2e09f7c7b17 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.md @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +I + +#### A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FAR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IN LIMINE OF UNRELATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS + +cos + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. M, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlement Agreements, and aamunds therefor states as follows: + +## 'Introduction + +One of the underpinnings of Epstein's malicious prosecution against was that had "fabricated," "manufactured" and "ginned up" his clients' claims against Epstein for the express purpose of supporting a massive Ponzi scheme. In furtherance of this patently false charge, EpsteM alleged that the claims being pursued by L.M., E.W. and Jane Dow "were weak and had Minimal value." Complaint at I 42(h),I In fact, Epstein even sued one of his victims, L.M., and charged that she was knowingly furthering Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme by seeking a + +I Allegations that the victims' claims were ginned up are replete throughout Epstein's maliciously-filed complaint. + +"multi-million dollar recovery . . . which was completely out of proportion to her alleged damages." Id. at ¶ 7. Thus, there can be no credible argument that Epstein has not put at issue the amounts voluntarily paid by Epstein to settle these purported "weak" claims.2 + +## Argument + +Epstein's motion once again ignores a critical fact: this is his lawstiitTET chose to file suit against and built the playing ground on which the les Sn tfs'ellitigate. The only remaining claim is I= malicious prosecution counte , which is premised on the assertion that Epstein lacked probable cause to file the u er Vomplaint. Thus, when Epstein au' argues that evidence of settlement amounts relat .W. and Jane Doe's cases are not relevant, he defeats his own argument by ha ' \ e value of their cases at issue. And, while evidence regarding settlement amount dmi edly highly prejudicial to Epstein's ability to support his fabricated claims agaii a s, that prejudice is neither unfair nor unjust. + +## A. The Timing and Settlements Paid to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe are Relevant under a 401 Analysis; + +2The Coultas previously ruled that the number of claims that Epstein was facing at the time he initiated, and during his continuance of, this proceeding against EMI, and the significant financial exposure related to those claims, is admissible (although the details and merits of the claims may not be disclosed without further Court order). + +While asks the Court to permit him to introduce evidence of the settlement amounts and date of each settlement, at this time does not intend to introduce the settlement agreements between Epstein AS E.W., and Jane Doe. Epstein's trial strategy or subsequent rulings by the Court, however, could impact decision in that regard. For example, L.M.'s settlement a eement includes reference to the underlying claims brought against her by Epstein. Thus, it is possible that may seek to introduce L.M.'s settlement agreement into evidence to rebut assertions made by Epstein at trial + +As a result of the false charges that L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases were "fabricated" and "had minimal value," intends to introduce to the jury the individual settlement amounts received by L.M. (\$1,000,000), E.W. (\$2,000,000) and Jane Doe (\$2,500,000), an well as the dates that the cases were settled (2010). The relevance and probative value facts is straightforward: they will help assist the jury in determining whether Epst c.O91 kep tivated to sue as a means of attempting to evade liability to his victims, the stein had probable cause to believe that the cases were "fabricated" and "weak" c time he filed the lawsuit, and whether Epstein had probable cause to continue his after the settlements were reached. See § 90.401, F cution for another two years + +The settlement amounts paid to Edw S' • s are particularly relevant and material to iii, Epstein's motive to file this baseless la .° Ep ein knew at the time he filed suit that clients' claims were exceeding) g d represented a great risk of significant financial exposure, whether via settleme ough a compensatory and punitive damage verdict. Epstein therefore filed this lawsu er to intimidate and his clients, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, into cheapt ompromising their valuable claims. Moreover, by suing the attorney representing a vi ims who had suffered the most, Epstein was sending a message to every other victirarOein was willing to use his billions to sue children that he had molested 20, 30, or + +4 Page I of Epstein's Motion for Protective Order details the contested factual issue regarding Epstein's motive: + +has argued that Epstein's filing of the original civil proceeding against was motivated by a desire to silence (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe] and possibly others. Epstein denies this motivationti." + +150+ times and their counsel, what else might he be willing to do to avoid an extended prison term and tens or even many hundreds of millions of dollars in damages? + +## B. The Timing and Settlements Paid to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe Ar Subject to Exclusion Under a 403 Analysis. + +Epstein's claim that evidence related to the settlements of L. and Jane Doe is unduly prejudicial under a 403 analysis is baseless. "In order for tel tt probative evidence to be deemed unfairly prejudicial, it must go beyond the i judice associated with any relevant evidence. Relevant evidence is inherently pre wever, it is only unfair prejudice, substantially outweighing probative value, whic ts exclusion of relevant matters." State v. Gad 27 So. 3d 768, 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 20105 emal quotations omitted). Relevant evidence of Epstein's having settled claims bro E.W., and Jane Doe is of course inherently prejudicial because it is at leas tial if not direct evidence that Epstein lacked probable cause to claim that the cases weree fabricated" or "weak". There is however no unfair prejudice from this evidence, which ik, only relevant due to Epstein's false allegations that the three victims' claims were 7t ricated," "ginned up," and "had minimal value." While the Court has understanda de efforts to sanitize the trial as much as possible, the values of the claims being pursued E.W., and Jane Doe are at the very heart of this case and there is no unfair prejudice to admitting this relevant evidence. + +# C. Evidence of Settlements Paid in Prior Cases is Admissible Under Florida Law. + +Finally, Section 90.408, Fla. Stat. does not bar introduction of the amount of settlement payments made to L.M., E. W, and Jane Doe because the settlements are relevant to element of claim (in case two), lack of probable cause, and are not being used pstein's liability in the civil cases brought by those three victims (case one). As stat O ourth District Court of Appeal in Levin v. Ethan Inc.: C + +Although settlement offers are generally not admissible 21 evidence in the lawsuit in which the offers are made an offer of settlement in one case can be relevant in another case. + +825 So. 2d 132, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (emph %c ) (holding that the trial court erred in excluding settlement offers from case one SAS t4kc on 90.408, because the settlement offers were relevant to contested factual issue ,, t o). + +For example, in Ritter v. 12' ithe usband to a divorce proceeding sought to include the value of his wife's pending per nal njury claim as an asset in the parties' equitable distribution. 690 So. 2d 1372, 1376 ( DCA 1997). In order to place a value on that asset, the husband sought to introd c vidence of the wife's offer to settle the claim with the at-fault party's insurance = Id. The Second DCA reversed the trial court's ruling excluding that evidence under 0.408, because the settlement offer in the personal injury case (case one) was relevant to a contested factual issue in the divorce proceeding (case two) and did not propose to settle any issue in that proceeding. See id. Thus, Section 90.408 did not bar introduction of the settlement amount offer in the divorce proceeding. Id. + +The value of the independent claims has been expressly placed in issue by Epstein's allegations in his maliciously filed Complaint. There is no better evidence of that value than the price he chose to pay to resolve those independent claims. These were not merely offers or demands, they are the final contracted prices for the settlements. Here we are speaking merely of 1.1 "Offers" to settle. + +Similarly, the settlement amounts paid by Epstein are relev both as o whether Epstein had an economic motive to extort, to the extent of th ve, and as to whether Epstein had probable cause to file this malicious proceeding all the claims against Epstein by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe were "fabricated," "gt u d "had minimal value." Moreover, the settlements paid by Epstein in the victim i not propose to settle any claim related to a in this proceeding. Based o in Ritter the settlement amounts are therefore admissible. + +For the foregoing Order and In Li s, the Court should deny Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective f Unrelated Settlements and permit to introduce the timing and settlement id to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. + +## Conclusion + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this / LC) day of Janus-i:j , 2018. + ++6s + +JACKSCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx ylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.corn Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 F (561) 383-9451 "CI) for J. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0efd8642d78b6b72743134387e165036463471e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966/EFTA02763966.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,534 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763966.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 11172, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 536.25390625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 536.25390625, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FAR PROTECTIVE ORDER \nAND IN LIMINE OF UNRELATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 317.2315979003906 + ], + [ + 531.2728881835938, + 317.2315979003906 + ], + [ + 531.2728881835938, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.8940734863281, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 340.8694763183594, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 340.8694763183594, + 466.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 267.8940734863281, + 466.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.072, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 227.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 279.072, + 227.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Timing and Settlements Paid to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe are Relevant under a \n401 Analysis;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 518.60302734375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 518.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Timing and Settlements Paid to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe Ar Subject to \nExclusion Under a 403 Analysis.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 241.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 241.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Evidence of Settlements Paid in Prior Cases is Admissible Under Florida Law.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 513.4667358398438, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 513.4667358398438, + 145.10302734375 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 145.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 475.10302734375 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 475.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 143.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763966" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d51ef30564ceaf11f3a045dbe659d7aab282b0e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.md @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMEtAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SSIBILITY OF E + +Counter-Plaintiff J. bAcirmough undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion in Litnine to address the adini 4iti4of Trial Exhibit #132, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +### Background + +- 1. Exhibit #1,2 of exhibit list is "New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex ot a predator, February 25, 2011." +- 2. p f the New York Post article is attached hereto as Exhibit `A'. e article, Jeffrey Epstein is quoted regarding the underlying child molestation claims, as lows: + +"I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an offender. It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel." + +"The crime that was supposedly committed in Florida is not a crime in New York." + +4. At the December 5, 2017 hearing, the Court requested additional briefing concerning the admissibility of Exhibit #132, which Epstein objected to as irrelevant, highly prejudicial, and inadmissible hearsay. + +### Argument + +## a. Exhibit #132 is Relevant + +5. punitive damage claim against Epstein is b he assertion that Epstein intentionally and maliciously filed false claims against Brad ards in an attempt to intimidate • his clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe dozens of other victims into cheaply compromising or abandoning sexual molesta against Epstein. This maliciously filed lawsuit was effectively an attempt to cove 1 extent of Epstein's crimes so that the details would never become known, so th p could avoid any civil liability. + +45•A + +6. Epstein's having co ar is underlying sexual molestation of children to "stealing a bagel" is relevant e denc the punitive damage claim, in that it tends to prove that Epstein lacked remorse f heun erlying crimes that he was attempting to cover-up, and that he lacked remorse for atte ted cover-up itself. It is also highly relevant that even after pleading guilty to cri ar es Epstein continues to publicly deny his guilt by referring to "The crime that I committed in Florida." [emphasis added] a R.J. Tobacco Co. v. Calloway, 01 So. 3d 753, 768 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), review denied, SC16-1937, 2017 WL 1023712 (Fla. Mar. 16, 2017), and ccrt. denied, 138 S. Ct. 163 (2017) (stating that the jury's determination of punitive damages includes whether the defendant showed remorse for his wrongful conduct). + +7. Regarding Epstein's lack of remorse, Exhibit #132 is further relevant pursuant to the broad scope of admissible evidence on the issue of punitive damages, which was clearly and persuasively articulated by the Fourth DCA in Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Janssens as follows: + +- (1) The amount of the plaintiffs litigation expenses; (2) the seriousnes, the hazard to the public, (3) the profitability of the marketing on (increased by an appropriate multiple); (4) the attitude and co of the enterprise upon discovery of the misconduct; (5) the f the manufacturer's awareness of the hazard and of its excessive e number and level of employees involved in causing or coved up e marketing misconduct; (7) the duration of both the improper marke havior and its cover-up; (8) the financial condition of the ente d the probable effect thereon of a particular judgment; and (9) the hment the enterprise will probably receive from other sources. + +These factors appear to be reasonable con in aggravation or mitigation of punitive damages and, in most res e consistent with existing Florida decisions on punitive damages. The re ourt stated some years ago that matters in aggravation or mid punitive damages are relevant and admissible in evidence, Rina Aaron, 314 So.2d 762 (Fla.1975), and evidence relevant to the for ors would appear to be admissible under that decision. + +463 So. 2d 242, 248 (Fla. 1st D CO84) (emphasis supplied). + +8. The statem de by Jeffrey Epstein in the New York Post article are clearly relevant to the foKo tig factors under the Johns-Manville Sales Corp. test: "(2) the seriousness of the hazar lie," "(4) the attitude and conduct of [Jeffrey Epstein] upon the discovery of the mist c , and "(7) the duration of the improper [conduct] and its cover-up." Id. + +9. Jeffrey Epstein's molestation of dozens of children and his gross abuse of the civil justice system to avoid both civil and criminal liability for those acts constitutes a series hazard to the public. Evidence of Epstein's lack of remorse regarding this hazardous conduct, which he equates to "stealing a bagel" and does not consider to be illegal under New York law, is therefore relevant to the jury's determination of punitive damages. See id. Moreover, Epstein's attempt to use his wealth and power to silence his child victims and their legal counsel is also a serious hazard to the public. When those victims attempted to speak out and seek justice, Epstein attempted to cover up his misconduct by suing a victim and her attorney, in ingly false and malicious lawsuit. Exhibit #132 is evidence of the scope and duration of ver-up. + +10. As relevant evidence of aggravating factors in damage claim, Exhibit #132 is therefore admissible evidence. ee Johns-Manville a rp.. 463 So. 2d at 248. + +# b. Exhibit #132 is Not Unfairly Prejudic + +11. "In order for relevant, probative evid med unfairly prejudicial, it must go beyond the inherent prejudice associated w a levant evidence. Relevant evidence is inherently prejudicial; however, it is onl rejudice, substantially outweighing probative value, which permits exclusion of pefhv atters." State v. Gad, 27 So. 3d 768, 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (internal quotatio (emphasis supplied). + +12. Obviousl }t levant ar evidence demonstrating Epstein's lack of remorse is inherently prejudicial beca • •s an ravating factor upon which the jury can rely in determining whether and in what t t impose punitive damages. Jeffrey Epstein compared his molestation of childre g a bagel" and questioned whether the sexual abuse of children was even illegal. re nably believes that the jury will view these party-admissions as evincing a total lack of remorse on the part of Epstein. Such evidence, however, cannot possibly result in "unfair" prejudice to Epstein, else the party carrying the burden of proof on a punitive damage claim would be categorically barred from introducing relevant evidence regarding lack of remorse. + +Additionally, questioning the legitimacy of the criminal charges against him perpetuates the fiction Epstein created in alleging that support a massive Ponzi scheme. "ginned up" and fabricated the claims against Epstein to + +## c. Exhibit #132 is Not Barred Under the Hearsay Rule. + +13. As an initial matter, Exhibit #132 is not hearsay because Edw oes not seek to introduce Epstein's statements to prove the truth of the matter is not contention that the sexual molestation of children is the equivalent aCd ling a bagel. 5[e Fla. Stat. § 90.801(1Xc) ("'Hearsay' is a statement, other t ade by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence t v truth of the matter asserted."). + +14. And, even if the statements we they are admissible under§ 90.803(18) as an exception to the rule against hearsa cally, out of court statements made by Jeffrey Epstein, offered against Epstein at t a missible as a party admission against interest. as& § 90.803(18). + +# Conclusion + +For the for g r ns, the Court should overrule Epstein's objections to Exhibit #132. + +WHEJ RF7Counter-Plaintiff, 3. respectfully requests that the Court enter a. nting this Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit 132, as we as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Motion in Limine +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 18th day of January, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +David P. Vitale Jr. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +ads'. Epstein Motion in Limine Case No.: 502009CA040800,OaXMBAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppell Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. Edw + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®IinIcrocIdaw.co tt@linkrocklaw.com; Kara®IinIcrocklaw.com; Angela@linIcrocld .com; anya@linIcrocIdaw.com;tina®IinIcrocklaw.com Link & Rockenb .A. 1555 Palm B Boulevard Suite 301 West P FL 33401 Phone: ( 7-3600 Fax: (561)- 27-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Motion in Limine +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +METRO + +# **Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator** + +By Amber Sutherland + +February 25, 2011 | 5:00am + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_9_Picture_2.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein David McGlynn + +Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making wisecracks about his Just-ended Jail stint for having sex with an underage girl. + +'I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender; " the financier told The Post yesterday. + +"It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel," said Epstein. + +Epstein's flippant reasoning aside, a New York Judge ruled at a hearing last month that the moneyman is the most dangerous kind of sex offender: a Level 3. + +Epstein recently returned to his \$50 million East 71st Street mansion and celebrated his release from a Florida Jail with his close pal, Britain's Prince Andrew. + +Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence for sdiciting a minor for prostitution. + +In court papers, the victim was identified as a 14-year-old girl. + +At one point. Epstein was facing 10 years to life on multiple counts of statutory rape, according to Investigators. Court documents in that case claimed he routinely sought out girls as young as 14 and paid them \$20O to \$1,000 for sexual massages in his homes In Palm Beach, Fla.. and Manhattan. + +He also molested girls he had brought in from South America and Europe and once was given three 12-year from France as a "birthday gift." the documents alleged. + +Epstein struck a secret nonprosecution deal with the feds. The government agreed to drop its pro ex-crime allegations If Epstein copped to prostitution felonies in Florida state court. + +But in New York's sex-offender database, Epstein doesn't come up in a ZIP code search. He s only via the -name search" option, and no New York address is listed. + +That's because Epstein's Upper East Side home is considered "temporary." By s required to provide only his permanent address to the database, and Epstein listed his Florida home. + +Ftecommenclod by \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c68581b33c66924b184c631c703b267c5653a9e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/EFTA02763975.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,671 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 11678, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.04, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_9_Picture_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nHt. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SSIBILITY OF \nE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 477.0540771484375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 477.0540771484375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 340.06500244140625, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 340.06500244140625, + 464.60302734375 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 464.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.624, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 335.5055236816406, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 335.5055236816406, + 217.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 217.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Exhibit #132 is Relevant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 289.25970458984375, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 289.25970458984375, + 245.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 245.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Exhibit #132 is Not Unfairly Prejudic", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 327.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 327.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Exhibit #132 is Not Barred Under the Hearsay Rule.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 436.0418395996094, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 436.0418395996094, + 217.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 217.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 337.38726806640625, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 337.38726806640625, + 493.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 493.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 134.60302734375 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 134.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 32.436, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 32.436, + 157.95 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763975" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/_page_9_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/_page_9_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e3734607858c3ea267b9212d7cf9d32107a6d23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763975/_page_9_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:64e654d82b1b80e7b483e9a9172d35fb55ff683d931760d20fba8e549821bfc5 +size 244775 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbea9d1a248c441bad0e0ea3cf9031c80b7fbbe9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.md @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT iN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF IN'S NOTICE OF FILING UPDATED UNVERIFIED ANSWERS T INTERROGATORIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey want to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, hereby provides notice of of his Updated Unverified Answers to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff B ' September 15, 2017, Expert Interrogatories, in further support of his Decem 1 2017, Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness and t pursuant to counsel's statI tejs at the January 17, 2018, hearing. + +o)'s + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 5;10 903) Angela M. Many (Flyt2 Primary: Scott@lInkrockllrw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco inIcrocklaw.com 5- anya®Iinkrocklaw.com Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the Notice has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 18, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1) and the Notice with the Answers have been served via e-mail. + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +(S' e tCounsel fo r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +# CSERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Sc a, hart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea kes oulevard West Palm 33409 me law •m endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +os G + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE i brbc\_ J FFREY EPSTEIN'S UPDATED ANSWERS TO NTERROGATORIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jef pe Epst ("Epstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, hereby provid September 15, 2017, xpe interrogatories. nswers to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +#### EXPER ERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +- 1. State the expert whic address and profession of each person whom you expect to call as an trial or on whose expert opinions others have relied in forming opinions ill or may offer at trial. + +#### +15WER + +D. Culver Skip) III, Esq. Culver III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Lawyer + +- 2. "With regard to each listed above, state his/her background, education and experience which qualify him/her to testify as an expert in his/her area of expertise; and/or in lieu thereof, please provide a copy of each expert's most recent curriculum vitae. + +A copy of Mr. Curriculum Vitae was attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List. + +- 3. Give the name or title of each paper which each expert has authored in the fieldaof his/her expertise. + +# ANSWER + +0 See Mr. Curriculum Vitae attached to Eps ecember 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List. + +- 4. State the name, volume and page number of theju caylon in which each article or paper listed above can be found + +# ANSWER + +See Mr. Curriculum Vitae attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List. + +- 5. State the substance and enti e source of the facts on which each expert has relied in forming any opinion abo ich the expert is expected to testify. + +will testify as to legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause mmencing a civil action, and professional reputation. The sources of ÷trt ts on which he is relying are principally the pleadings, other public ' formation that was available before the original proceeding was initiated or discovered during the pendency of the original civil proceeding, deposition testimony, and the circumstances of Mr. defamation action against Alan Dershowitz. + +- 6. Give a complete list of all documents, depositions, exhibits, plans, drawings, ordinances or statutes which each expert has reviewed in forming his/her opinion. + +Nov. 09 11/20/09 12/07/09 01/09/13 04/08/16 04/08/16 06/30/17 11/10/17 11/14/17 11/29/17 12/05/17 12/07/17 01/09/18 News articles marked as Exhibits 2, 3, 4 and 5 at MI November 10, 2017, deposition Razorback Complaint E stein's Complaint Fourth Amended Counterclaim v. Dershowitz; Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Article: Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. la4er Dershowitz end in settlement Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Transcript of Order Granting Epstein's Motion for Conti df Trial, Hearing Transcript etc. Cao.) Hearing Transcript Hearing Transcript Notice of Taking Video De Debrincat v. Fischer, 21 (Fla. 2017) Endacott v. Internatignbl lathy, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005 Fundament v. 51, o. 2d 710 (Fla. 41h DCA 1984) II v. Kostro F. pp. 2d 1354 (M.D. Fla. 2000) Rule 4-1.7 es Regulating The Florida Bar Restate , of Law Governing Lawyers § 125 Flo ics Opinion 74-20 (1974) + +7. State the opinions to wh e experts aforementioned are expected to testify. + +#### ANS E T + +- on the information available to them Mr. Epstein had probable use to file a civil action against Mr. i.e., a reasonable rson had cause to believe that Mr. was involved in a scheme to entice investors to invest in purported settlements of claims against Mr. Epstein. +- 2. Mr. was ethically obligated to L.M. to disclose the conflict between his personal interests and her interests in connection with his representation of her in Mr. Epstein's lawsuit against them and should have obtained her informed consent to his representation before representing her. + +- 8. Give a summary of the grounds of each opinion stated. + +- 1. While at the Rothstein firm, Mr. represented three alleged sexual-abuse victims of Mr. Epstein in litigation against Mr. Epstein and participated in litigation tactics and strategies which could be perceived as not directly related to his clients but in furtherance of Rothste 's Ponzi scheme. +- 2. Extensive media coverage and other criminal and civil described a Ponzi scheme operated by individuals at the which utilized cases against Epstein to corroborate claims made to investors in the Ponzi scheme, incl \$200 million of settlements relating to cases agai in. +- 3. Mr. held himself out as a partner he had the authority to direct and mans that he was handling. +- 4. Mr. and L.M.'s interepSin of Mr. Epstein's claims thus implying that against them either were di existed a substantial risk course of the litigation. +- 9. Identify where the expert during the past 10 years t e rihas practiced or worked in his/her field vrrrse from the outset, or there ould become adverse during the + +# ANSWER + +th s Curriculum Vitae attached to Epstein's December 15, ed Trial Witness List. + +- 10. osition identified above, please state: + - b. + - c. + - d. Whether the expert was self-employed by someone else or associated as a partner. Each address where the expert practiced or was employed. The dates the expert was with each employer. The type of duty the expert performed with each employer. + +See Mr. Curriculum Vitae attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List. + +- II. If the expert has not practiced or worked in his/her field during the last 10 years, what was his/her employment during this time. + +#### ANSWER + +N/A + +- 12. Did the expert prepare anything or have anything prepared opinions or conclusions reached from his/her examination conducted? 'Cl i + - a. If so, state the date of preparation. + - b. The name or other means of identifi "o f h individual and entity to whom the material prepared was distribu +- c. The name and address of eac on o has present custody of each nonidentical copy of the material h his/her tests he/she + +# ANSWER + +No. + +- 13. Did the expo prep re br have prepared any material based upon tests, examinations or analyses of cume is that he/she conducted in which he/she did not render an opinion? + - a. state description of all material that was prepared by or for the expert. +The date that the material was prepared. + - c. The name or other means of identification of the person to whom all material was distributed. + - d. The name and address of the person who has present custody of each nonidentical copy of the material. + +No. + +- 14. If you will do so without a Request to Produce, attach a copy of all materials prepared by or for each expert on the basis of his/her tests, examinations or analyses to your answers to these Interrogatories + +#### ANSWER + +None. + +- 15. Is the expert to be compensated for his/her work and efforts in with this action? + +- a. If so, describe in detail the basis and/or rate of co to or on behalf of the expert, the amount c services rendered as of the date of your a +- b. Estimate the total amount of time completing all services to be rend to the conclusion of the case. 8 i a pected to be spent by the expert in matter from the date of your answers the total amount paid ayable to the expert for all ese interrogatories. +- c. Describe all additional se ted to be rendered by the expert + +4DA + +N + +#### ANSWER + +Mr. Epstein pro with a \$15,000 refimdable/replenishable deposit. To date, has billed or incurred approximately \$9,000 in fees and penses. Mr. estimates that he will bill \$15,000- \$25,9R0 for is ime preparing for and testifying at his deposition and trial. + +- 16. Has rt served as an expert witness in any other litigated case in the past 5 years? If to each case: + +- b. The style of the case, the Court in which it was filed and the names and addresses of the attorneys involved. Whether the expert was retained on behalf of the Plaintiff or Defendant. +- c. The general subject matter as to which the expert provided services. +- d. Whether sworn testimony was given in the case, and, if so, whether the expert or you are in possession of a transcript of the testimony. + ++6s + +# ANSWER + +See attached chart. The following attorneys were lead counsel (affiliations and addresses as of that time): + +Sarabay Marine, Inc. v. a + +Plaintiffs' counsel: Steven C. Dupre, Carlton Jorden Burt, P.A., 4221 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33 + +Defendants' counsel: Matthew L. Scoter Cisac, P.A., 4301 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 400, Tampa + +Kapral v. GEICO Indem. Co.: + +Plaintiff's counsel: Kerry C. McGuinn, J & Guyton, P.A., 109 North Brush S Russo 500, Tampa, FL 33602 + +Defendants' counsel: Amanda P.A., 226 South Palafox Stre oung, Bill, Roumbos & Boles, Pensacola, FL 32502 + +Cordell Consultant, Inc. v. Abb + +Plaintiffs' counse Gilbert, Gilbert Yarnell Law Offices, 11000 Prosperity Fite 205, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 + +Defend c • Deborah S. Corbishley, Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., 201 Sou Bi e Boulevard, Suite 1100, Miami, FL 33131 + +Mr. WIrpp ies of the transcripts of his depositions in the three cases. + +#### D. CULVER 111 + +Testimony as an Expert In Court, by Deposition, or by Affidevit/Declaration In Last Five Years (as o January 15, 2018) + +| Date Matter Subj. of Testimony | e of | +|---------------------------------|--------------------| +| Pr oceeding Typ | o/b/o | +| Counsel's conflicts of interest | Testimony at jury | +| Counsel's conflicts of interest | Deposition Defs. | +| | Deposition 1 Defs. | +| ( | -Deposition | +| — t | l | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4af3c68bdac85fc8ca27818ca875831a7dc3f790 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986/EFTA02763986.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,953 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763986.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 13788, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF IN'S NOTICE OF FILING \nUPDATED UNVERIFIED ANSWERS T INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CSERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 437.2200012207031 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 493.57000732421875 + ], + [ + 220.25999450683594, + 493.57000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE i brbc_ J FFREY EPSTEIN'S \nUPDATED ANSWERS TO NTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 472.15899658203125, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 472.15899658203125, + 390.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 390.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPER ERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 457.84771728515625, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 457.84771728515625, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "+15WER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.58999633789062, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 583.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 102.58999633789062, + 583.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 265.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 265.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 389.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 389.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 511.9200000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 199.79006958007812, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 199.79006958007812, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANS E\nT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 523.863037109375 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 523.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 127.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 127.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 486.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 486.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 210.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 210.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 445.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 445.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 210.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 210.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 445.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 445.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 199.79006958007812, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 199.79006958007812, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. CULVER 111", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 353.4148254394531, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 353.4148254394531, + 66.337646484375 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 66.337646484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763986" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f517c559d4cf4e8c5a337dbdc2b390eb9886f49d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +the following hearing at the time sta Court at the Palm Beach Coun Palm Beach, Florida 33401: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that P lain• ei• Co • -Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up re the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit , 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800,OOOavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## (Dated Agreed nsel) + +MOTION: Pla ounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's November 22, 2017, Request for icial Notice + +> fendant/Cotmter-Plaintiff Request for Judicial Notice J. December 4, 2017, + +Tuesday, January 30, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O S + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 18, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINK i tra ACH, PA 155 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 41 ,174 1 each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +ir/s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c tniento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho1 tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa c est h Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19.ttr dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63b4581394def2ea590293fef2b28dad1f6dc557 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997/EFTA02763997.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02763997.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8122, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "(Dated Agreed nsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 386.1863708496094, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 386.1863708496094, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 452.170654296875, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 452.170654296875, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02763997" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cbf5fe100fdcbc71ea4d05760012db867ea2d70 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +the following hearing at the time sta Court at the Palm Beach Coun Palm Beach, Florida 33401: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that P • t (sif • Co r-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up re the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Goes + +MOTION: De t/Counter-Plaintiff J. a December 1, 2017, tn for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission + +O Wednesday, January 31, 2018 + +ain Reopen Discovery to Take Depositions iffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's January 10, 2018, Motion to + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +One or more of the parties who may be affected by the ntelOI are selfrepresented. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 18, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + +> LINK i tra ACH, PA 155 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 41 ,174 1 each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +rk /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted a una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento pan poder participar en ate procedimiento, usted tiene de ho1 tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la a makhdad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 194,17 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi Oren akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o e okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko akte ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat o ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin r a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke si u gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70d7e34bbd6a15f2a0595802a330041042e7dcef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001/EFTA02764001.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764001.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8166, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 369.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.87 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764001" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e80ee7d07d19dbf92247ef6a8863957059373b76 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.md @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +video deposition of: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the tcersi , attorneys CANCEL the Duces Tecum /7 1 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +J. + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +Defendant/Countexplaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF VIDEO DEPOSITION + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List 'S N , ) + +# NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME LOCATION + +C. Culver III January 24, 2018 + +at 10:00 a.m. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Video Deposition DT + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 18th day of JANUARY, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting, Inc. (court reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (videographer) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Video Deposition DT + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Video Deposition DT + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..226db9d9680140a1daf42ff41cfc68e387ce593f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005/EFTA02764005.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764005.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3110, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 460.05548095703125, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 460.05548095703125, + 332.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 332.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 460.418701171875, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 460.418701171875, + 460.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 460.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 458.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 388.62, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 388.62, + 458.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 135.27 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764005" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..081b23a63ceb71ca882429aac15a510baac4528d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE TO Nct ,AT TRIAL + +TO: Jeffrey Epstein do Scott J. Link, Esquire Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL + +YOU ARE S RE NOTICED to appear at Trial before the Honorable Donald Hafele, Judge of the( et it ourt, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Courtroom - , est Palm Beach, FL 33401, on March 13, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. or up to and including 4arch 26, 2018 to testify in the Trial of this action. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice to Appear at Trial + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 19th day of Jan., 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice to Appear at Trial + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice to Appear at Trial + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Cos \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79d7bc729661abe81536d1c14c41c8593ff37de1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009/EFTA02764009.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764009.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2737, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE TO Nct ,AT TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 397.0089111328125, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 397.0089111328125, + 385.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 385.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764009" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fc8bba1a90964c02ba6728d8e260dfcf2387238 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXX/vD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND tag' EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF ICIAL NOTICE + +CO SA + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jcffity, Request for Judicial Notice Purs December 4, 2017 [D.E. 11 ce• pstein"), responds in opposition to the a Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203 dated y Defendant/Counter-Plaintif4 + +In witnesses women who filed civil tort claims against Epstein. [D.E. 1042.] These wom i the three clients he represented plus other alleged victims. Neither three clients nor the other women are parties to this litigation. Allowing any introduction or discussion of the other, unrelated lawsuits would create twenty-five mini-trials and result in a month-long trial in this case. his malicious prosecution Counterclaim, has identified as + +# I3ACKGROUND + +The Court, in an effort to keep this trial from turning into a circus, has already ruled that + +is limited at trial to discussing his three clients' (EW, LM and Jane Doe) claims. + +Specifically, the Court's January 16, 2018, Order provides: + +[T]he parties may speak generally about the number of claims that Epstein was facing at the time he i\_nitiated i and during his continuance, of this proceeding against The details, the merits and what ma have been discovered in cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted by will n •e admi i.le int evidence, subject to the Court's reconsideration at trial evidence is presented. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:25-5:24.) will be permitted to discuss generally, without testifyin specific case or claim, his leadership role in coo prosecution of all of the claims. (12/7/17 Tr. 6:1-24.) + +[D.E. 1147.] Epstein respects this Court's ruling, but prese 414 • bjection that even these are irrelevant and will unduly confuse the jury and prejud. L tejh s right to a trial on the issues in this malicious prosecution action. + +On December 4, 2017, before the Notice asking the Court to take noti involved three clients o C \S's trigs, filed a Request for Judicial -five court actions. Only five of those actions + +- o +- 6. and 16. Jane D . 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Consolidated Action, tates District Court, Southern District of Florida, C o. 08-CV-80119 [as to representation + - 15. E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 151h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXXMB AD Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 + - 24. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXXMB + - 25. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +dant is not on trial." Any mention of or use of information from, cas Ile ed victims who did not eCt represent is absolutely improper, as such evide 4earing on the malicious prosecution Counterclaim and is unfairly prejudicial. Fd r weli•Intern., Inc. v. Guilder, 23 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 3'd DCA 2009); Long Term Care Fou 2001) (allegations in a differe against defendant were not relevant and were highly prejudicial since "under section i79. 3, Florida Statutes, any relevance the complaint might have had was outweigh y th un air prejudice against the [defendant]"). "It is inconsistent with the notions of fair • I e state to force a defendant to resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which DCA 201 finding that "because the prior case was settled, none of the allegations therein were proven"). 778 So. 2d 1100, 1102-03 (Fla. 5th DCA v. AtL Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4th + +## ARGUMENT + +Preserving his prior objections on the grounds of relevance and unfair prejudice, Epstein respects this Court's prior ruling that will be permitted to introduce some evidence relating to his three clients' cases. Based on the Court's December 7, 2017, ruling, Epstein understands the Court will likely take judicial notice of the five cases in which ards' three clients were involved (Nos. 6, 13, 15, 16 (duplicate), 24 and 25). However, op ses any reference, judicial notice, and admissibility of any other matter identified ds' December 4, 2017, Request for Judicial Notice. [D.E. 1104.] The litany of twe cases serves only to prejudice the jury and inflame or confuse them from the issu action. + +As seen from Request for Judicial Notice [D.E. 1104], it is apparent that he intends to use as much information from other cases as possible solely to impermissibly inflame the jury and appeal to the jury's emotions, or solely to prove bad character. See v. State, + +19 So. 3d 277 (Ha. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). "If the introduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a confusion in the minds of the jurors in excess of the legitimate probative effect of such evidence, if it tends to obscure rather than illuminate the true issue before the jury then such evidence should be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing Perper v. Edell 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)); see also Agrofollajes, SA v. El Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 48 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect whe improperly becomes focus of trial). + +A trial court's discretion in determining the relevancy Co 'de t 'is limited by the rules of evidence and applicable case law." Thigpen v. United r s., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 645 (Ha. 4'b DCA 2008) (citing v. State, 863 :S; , 278 (Fla. 2003)); Hayes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. A006); DeVille v. State, 917 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Ha. 4i° DCA 2006); v. St 1 I . 2d 1260, 1262 (Ha. 4th DCA 2005); v. State, 883 So. 2d 387, 389 (F1 2004). "Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantial! ou eighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." § 90.403, Fla. Stat. + +Here, as j ourt 1Cas already ruled, these extrinsic and wholly unrelated cases are not relevant to (1 .1) cious prosecution Counterclaim against Epstein. Rather, these cases unduly prejud. in and would only result in confusion or an attempt to mislead the jury into believing these cases had some relevance to this action. + +### CONCLUSION + +Epstein respectfully requests that this Court deny Request for Judicial Notice. If this Court remains consistent in allowing to introduce the cases involving his three clients, then the cases identified at Nos. 6, 13, 15, 16 (duplicate), 24 and 25 are the only ones pertaining to clients. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the Service List below on January 24, 2018, through the Court's e-filin Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). listed on the uant to Florida + +> LINK & ROC 1555 Palm West Pal (561) 7 H, PA Boulevard, Suite 301 orida 33401 561) 727-3601 [fax] + +S t J. Link + +Ll ci:Sr i J. Link (FBN 602991) Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov(Minkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintifltounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

█████ J. █████
█████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
█████ J. █████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of █████ rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
█████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9d5ddf1eaf020c22b98b0c1d67a2dce1bc17193 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013/EFTA02764013.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,371 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764013.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 10570, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \ntag' EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 499.42633056640625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 499.42633056640625, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I3ACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.17333984375, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.17333984375, + 505.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 505.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 326.60589599609375, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 326.60589599609375, + 100.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 100.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.0959167480469, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.0959167480469, + 223.863037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 223.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764013" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcc1e6cdfbdc724680e4ce4260f55d0c289f4b5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800KWavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifflCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +(Date Agreed to b + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint' Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated be the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +- MOTIONS: 1. De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Notices of aintift'ICounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Implicating the Fifth ( s , Amendment [Sections 1I-V only] and Attorney-Client Privileges [D.E. 1100-1103] +0 2 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence and Supplement [D.E. 1051; D.E. 1077] =, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1087] + - 3. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. EIMI Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1113] + +A + +ss + +PlaintifVCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1137] + +- 4. PlaintifVCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Damages Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude His Testimony [D.E. 11)8]\* +- 5. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motioflb4rotective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements [ + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Opposition to Epstein's Motion for P of Unrelated Settlement Agreements [ Response in er and in Limine + +DATE: Friday, February 2, 2018 + +A [The hearing of these matters will go forward on this date only if the Court's trial docket is open k + +TIME: 9:30 a.m. + +Pursuant to the Court's judici (s\ + +- I . The JA cannot c g unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are +- 3. Any Memorandu ubmitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages and should denote the time. +- 4. Any pateri s submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing.\* +- 5. oving arty is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with envelopes. ost-hearing submittals will be accepted unless requested by the Court. + +The parties agree that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. may file his Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Damages Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude His Testimony on or before January 29, 2018. All other Motions set forth herein have been briefed. + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O AS + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 26, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINK i tra ACH, PA 155 i iii7 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 1 each, Florida 33401 [1) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +ir/s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeapa4ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c F m tniento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene det hoi 1 tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la a mabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19/4407 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tienc discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens Ice en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon you akte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d78e6e72d7cef639a5a828a12385f516731d3c18 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019/EFTA02764019.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764019.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 9112, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.124, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 409.428, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 409.428, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O AS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.0420227050781, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.0420227050781, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764019" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d47912fb90dad05bcca2741d22511ad8f32b521a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.md @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifFCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS RE: DEPOSITION OF 1. TAKEN NOVEMBER 10,2017 + +J. , by and through his rsived counsel, hereby files his Objections and Counter-Designations to the Designa • of ffrey Epstein regarding the testimony from J. I t November l0 1j97 sition transcript for use in the instant case and/or as rebuttal: + +(...) + +A-C Trott'f-CLIENT PRIVILEGE ASSERTION A UMENTATIVE BO3EST EVIDENCE SHK SECOND HAND KNOWLEDGE VS VIOLATES STIPULATION LP LITIGATION PRIVILEGE H HEARSAY O OPINION + + COL COLLOQUY + R RELEVANCE + REP REPETITIOUS + C COMPOUND/NO ANSWER + S SPECULATION + I I IMPROPER IMPEACHMENT + P NO PROPER PREDICATE + IC IMPROPER CROSS + + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------| +| | 5:1-6:9 | | | +| 8:15-9:15 | | | | +| 11:15-25 | | | | +| 12:1-19 | | 12:17-12:19 C | | +| 12:22-13:14 | | | | +| 21:3-22:17 | | 21:8-22:4 C | | +| 23:4-28:18 | | 23:17-23:18 C | | +| | | 25:17-26:25 R O I 403 | | +| | | 27:1-28:5 R, 403 | | +| 28:25-30:2 | | 29:1-13 O, R, 403 | | +| 30:12-31:2 | | | | +| 32:12-15 | | | | +| 32:21-33:17 | | | | +| 33:23-38:12 | | 35:12-18 O, R 403 | | +| | | 36:15-19 O, COL | | +| | | 37:1-5 O, COL | | +| | | 37:19-20 O, COL | | +| | | 37:24-39:1 O, A,C | | +| 38:20-39:1 | | | | +| 39:11-40:21 | | | | +| 40:24-41:4 | | | | +| 41:9-42:19 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|--------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------| +| 42:22-44:13 | | 43:13-44:25 O, 403 II | | +| 44:19-46:8 | | 45:1-46:8 O, 403, II | | +| | | 46:23-48:25 O, R | | +| 46:24-47:14 | | | | +| 48:15-49:8 | | 49:1-14 O, R, 403 | | +| 49:13 | | | | +| 50:3-53:23 | | 50:3-53:23 O, R, 403 | | +| 54:13-20 | | 54:12-56:9 O, R, 403 II | | +| 54:22-61:1 | | | | +| 61:16-63:12 | | | | +| 64:6-65:24 | | | | +| 66:3-15 | | | | +| 67:9-68:7 | | 67:17-69:21 O, R, 403 | | +| 68:12 | | | | +| 68:15-75:25 | | | | +| 76:13-77:23 | | | | +| 78:3-6 | | | | +| 78:20-79:3 | | | | +| 79:6-15 | | | | +| 80:8-83:14 | | | | +| 83:19-86:2 | | | | +| 87:4-19 | | | | +| 88:7-19 | | | | +| 88:22-89:23 | | | | +| 91:1-19 | | | | +| 91:23-92:5 | | | | +| 92:15-23 | | 92:15-23 O, H | | +| 94:4-6 | | 94:4-6 H | | +| 94:11-19 | | | | +| 94:24-97:9 | | 96:3-97:9 O, H | | +| 97:19-101:7 | | 97:19-98:23 O H R403 | | +| | | 99:1-100:25 H, R 403 | | +| | | 101:1-102:24 O, R, H | | +| | | Rule 403 | | +| 101:16-103:2 | | | | +| 103:12-23 | | | | +| 104:2-105:2 | | 104:24-105:2 O, C | | +| 105:7-106:19 | 106:20-22 | 105:7-106:7 O, R | | +| | 108:23-110:3 | | | +| 110:16-22 | | | | +| 111:7-112:6 | | | | +| 112:11-16 | | | | +| 112:18-114:5 | | 112:21-25 O, H | | +| | | 113:1-114:2 OHR 403 | | + +| 114:12-116:25 | | 115:7-117:21 OHR403 | | +|---------------|--|---------------------|--| +| 117:2-21 | | | | +| 120:5-121:13 | | 120:19-25 O,H,R | | +| | | 121:1-13 O, H | | +| 122:24-123:5 | | 122:24-124:22 OHR | | +| 123:8-22 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|---------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------------| +| 123:24-124:22 | | | | +| 125:4-24 | | 125:16-25 O,H,SHK | | +| 126:2-10 | | 126:2-128:23 O,H,R | | +| 126:14-128:4 | | | | +| 128:7-23 | | | | +| 134:14-135:18 | | | | +| 135:23-24 | | | | +| 136:2-7 | | | | +| 136:15-138:24 | | 137:25-138:12 O, R | | +| | | A-C PRIV | | +| 139:11-144:13 | | | | +| 145:2-4 | | | | +| 147:3-151:10 | | 147:3-148:25 O, R | | +| | | 149:1-156:25 O, R | | +| 151:21-167:2 | | 157:1-166:15 O,R, H | | +| 167:21-176:23 | | 168:11-170:17 O,R | | +| | | 171:1-9 O, R, H | | +| | | 172:5-174:25 O,R,403 | | +| | | 175:1-3 O, C | | +| | | 175:1-176:23 O,R,403 | | +| 177:8-179:20 | | 177:8-179:20 O,R,403 | | +| 181:12-183:23 | | | | +| 184:7-23 | | | | +| 184:25-185:25 | | 185:9-25 O,C, II | | +| | | | | +| 189:3-193:13 | | 189:3-190:20 O, R | | +| | | 191:12-192:9 O, R | | +| 193:18-195:25 | | 193:18-20 O, C | | +| | | 194:5-17 O, R, 403 | | +| 196:12-15 | | | | +| 197:13-15 | | 197:13-15 O,C | | +| 198:23-25 | | 198:23-25 O, C | | +| 199:2-200:1 | | 199:12-200:1 O, R | | +| 201:5-203:14 | | 202:16-18 O, C | | +| 203:19-204:1 | | | | +| 204:5-205:13 | | | | + +| 205:15-207:2 | | | | +|---------------|--------------|------------------------|--| +| 207:22-214:11 | | 212:5-25 O, R, 403 | | +| | | 213:8-14 O, C | | +| | | 213:1-215:12 O, R, A | | +| 214:14-20 | | | | +| 214:22-215:12 | | | | +| 215:20-216:3 | | 215:25-216:10 O, A | | +| 216:9-17 | | | | +| 217:9-218:20 | | 217:9-218:25 O, R, 403 | | +| 218:23-220-16 | | 219:1-220:25 R | | +| 220:22-223:5 | | 221:1-222:25 R, 403 | | +| 223:12-19 | | 223:1-19 R | | +| 224:15-225:19 | | 224:15-25 R | | +| | | 225:1-19 O, R, A | | +| | 225:20 | | | +| | 225:25-227:5 | | | +| 227:7-10 | | 227:7-10 O, R | | +| 228:9-229:10 | | 228:9-229:23 O, R | | +| 229:16-23 | | | | +| 230:22-231:19 | | 230:22-231:15 O, R, H | | +| | | 231:16-19 O, C | | +| 234:20-235:1 | | 234:20-235:1 O, R | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | +| | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------| +| 237:19-238:7 | | 237:19-239:24 O, R | | +| 238:14-239:24 | | | | +| 241:5-242:4 | | | | +| 243:14-244:23 | | 243:22-244:25 O, R | | +| | | A, IC, C | | +| 245:15-246:14 | | | | +| 247:8-18 | | 247:16-18 COL | | +| 248:21-249:25 | | 249:9-10 C | | +| 250:10-24 | | 250:10-24 R | | +| 253:2-258:7 | | 256:9-25 R, 403 | | +| 258:18-268:19 | | 258:5-7 R | | +| | | 258:25-261:9 R | | +| | | 262:16-268:19 R | | +| 276:24-277:24 | | 276:24-277:25 A | | +| 278:14-15 | | 278:14-15 A | | +| 288:10-23 | | 288:10-13 R | | +| 289:15-22 | | 289:15-22 R | | +| 289:25-292:25 | | | | +| 294:6-1 | | | | +| 297:6-300:21 | | 298:18-30:21 R | | +| 303:24-304:22 | | 303:24-304:22 R | | +| 304:23-305:10
(subject to MPO) | | | | +| 305:11-307:2 | | 305:8-307:2 R | | +| | 307:2-308:16 | | | +| | 310:13-312:15 | | | +| | 312:24-313:11 | | | +| | 313:17-321:8 | | | +| 321:9-322:2 | | | | +| | 322:3-325:15 | | | +| 325:22-326:1 | | | | +| 326:16-327:6 | | | | +| | 327:7-23 | | | +| 327:24-328:14 | | | | +| | 329:9-25 | | | +| 330:1-332:24 | | | | +| 333:11-339:7 | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 25th day of JANUARY, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]'s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4a5083ece957076d7f8bb837625f012d71f63e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024/EFTA02764024.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764024.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 21789, + "elapsed_seconds": 98.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 539.2593994140625, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 539.2593994140625, + 95.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 95.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS \nRE: DEPOSITION OF \n1. TAKEN NOVEMBER 10,2017", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 467.25775146484375, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 467.25775146484375, + 366.77081298828125 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 366.77081298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.52, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 281.52, + 87.48 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764024" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acc26e75a87d9a24704588feed6813f844bac039 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.md @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, + +Defendants + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK, CIFPK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +FRESH CIVIL LITIGATION + +2010 AUG 25 AM 3: 26 + +**FILED** + +**PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST** + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel and in accordance with this Court's Order Setting Pretrial Procedures, hereby files his Witness and Exhibit Lists as follows: + +**WITNESSES** + +1. 1. Scott W. Rothstein, Esq. + Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler +2. 2. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esq. + Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler + c/o [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman + 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 +3. 3. William Berger, Esq. + Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler + Address to be provided +4. 4. [REDACTED] Adler, Esq. + Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler + Address to be provided +5. 5. Mike Fisten (investigator) + +Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Jaffe Weissing Eswards Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 + +- 6. Kenneth Jenne, Esq. Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 8. (investigator) Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 9. Richard Fandrey (investigator) Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 10. David Bodden, Esq. Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Address unknown at this time +- 11. Deborah Chief Operating Officer Former Employee of Rothstej Address unknown at this ti +- 12. Andrew Barnett Director of Corporate Former Employ Address +- 13. Chri ldt & Adler ment thstein Rosenfeldt & Adler t this time an, Esq. oyee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler own at this time +- 14. Bi =rock a/k/a "Uncle Bill" Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 15. Mark Nurik, Esq Former Employee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +A + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +- 16. Alan Sakowitz Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 17. Preve, Esq. Occupied an office at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler Address unknown at this time +- 18. Corporate Representative Q-Task Address unknown at this time +- 19. Mr. Howell Atty in Jacksonville who referred Plaintiff, E.W. to Address unknown at this time +- 20. Paul Cassell, Esq. Attorney in Utah who handles appellate i Address unknown at this time s , +- 21. Maria Villafona U.S. Attorneys Office Address unknown at this +- 22. Dexter Lee U.S. Attorneys Office Address unknoacitit-this time +- 23. Agent N Kirken. Fed f Investigations Add own at this time +- 24. ason Richard Federal Bureau of Investigations Address unknown at this time +- 25. Barry Bekkadan Address unknown at this time +- 26. A.J. Discala + +Address unknown at this time + +- 27. Michael Szafranski Address unknown at this time +- 28. Shimone Levy Address unknown at this time +- 29. Obidia Levy Address unknown at this time +- 30. Daniel Minkowitz Address unknown at this time +- 31. Levin Address unknown at this time +- 32. Kretchmar Address unknown at this time +- 33. Doug Van Allman Address unknown at this time +- 34. Barry Address unknown at this ti +- 35. Richard Pearson Address unknown at thi +- 36. Steven Levi kitc Address own t this time +- 37. own at this time +- 38. Mdyk Melvin Address unknown at this time +- 39. Jack Samoney Address unknown at this time +- 40. + +A + +g + +- 41. +- 44. +- 45. +- 46. +- 47. Steve Jackel Address unknown Michael Legamar Address unknown Kevin Drafter Address unknown Rob Buschel Address unknown at this time at this time at this time at this time Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative an PWMK of Operations +- 48. Records Custodian and/or Corporate R iiSit and/or Clockwork Capital Advisers Address unknown at this time PWMK of Operations Razorback Funding Address unknown at this time +- 49. Records Custodian and/or %r Representative and/or PWMK of Operations Fortress Investments Address unknown at thi +- 50. Records Cuistodi or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK oftperati ns Form Add s own at this time +- 51. oms Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or K of Operations Drawbridge Capital Address unknown at this time +- 52. Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK Drawbridge Funding + +Address unknown at this time Address unknown at this time + +- 53. Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK of Operations Banyan Investment Fund Address unknown at this time +- 54. Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK of Operations Centurion Credit Fund Address unknown at this time +- 55. Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK of Operations Platinum Management Fund Address unknown at this time +- 56. Each investor and potential investor who revi cases, real or fabricated, against Jeffrey Epstein sho, investments.' +- 57. Edward J. Morse Address unknown at this time +- 58. Carol Morse Address unknown at thi +- 59. Ted Morse Address unlcnow time +- 60. Patricia fl iorse Add at this time A Co's roximate ten (10) boxes of Rothstein to solicit third party +- 61. stodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or of Operations Morse Operations, Inc. Address unknown at this time + +&#x27; The names of the investors are unknown to Plaintiff at this time and will be provided upon receipt and review of the discovery pertaining to the investors and potential investors. + +- 62. Records Custodian and/or Corporate Representative and/or PWMK of Operation Blue Line Research & Development, LW Address unknown at this time +- 63. Jeffraitein do Burnett 777 S. Drive 901 Point West West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +- 64. Any and all witnesses identified in depositions. +- 65. Any and all witnesses identified in Interrogatories and respo +- 66. Any and all witnesses identified in Requests for Pro d responses thereto. +- 67. Any and all witnesses identified in Requests fo \ I •ns and responses thereto. +- 68. Plaintiff reserves his right to supplement\ t1C(c am d this list of witnesses during the course of discovery. thereto. 0-4s4 + +- 1. Any and all documents, in agreements, between, or on be regarding a purported settlem financing of any litigation betw +- 2. Any and al agreements regarding the be paid by not limited to, emails, correspondence, and settlement , its employees, agents or clients, and any third party y litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client, or the effrey Epstein and a RRA client. ts, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence and written or on behalf of RRA, its employees, agents, or clients and any third party and/or receipt of money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to pstein. +- 3. all documents, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence and written agreemen between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees, agents, or clients and any third party regarding the solicitation of money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. +- 4. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence and written agreements between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees, agents, or clients and any third party regarding the solicitation of money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- 5. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence, and written agreements between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees, agents, or clients and any third party regarding communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. +- 6. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence, canceled checks, bank statements, and written agreements between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees, agents, or clients and any third party regarding payments made to RRA to or on behalf of any investor for settlement of any litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 7. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, data, dente, memos, or similar documents between J. and any investor or th on or entity regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein as it relat fled investment pertaining to litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 8. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, or similar documents between Scott W. Rothstein and regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey E et pertaining to litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 9. Any and all documents, including but ii tl to, emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between William Be an any investor or third party person or entity regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentj i Je Epstein as it relates to any purported investment pertaining to litigation involving Je ata, correspondence, memos, or third party person or entity ates to any purported investment +- 10. Any and all documents ng but not limited to, emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between sell Adler and any investor or third party person or entity regarding Jeffrey Epstein h mentions Jeffrey Epstein as it relates to any purported investment pertaining to litigatjcut inv lying Jeffrey Epstein. +- 11. Any ments, includin but not limited to, emails, data, correspondence, written agreemen os between J. and any other attorney, employee or agent of RRA re ffrey Epstein relating to any investment or potential investment in any case invol y Epstein. +- 12. Any and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, data, correspondence, written agreements or memos between Scott W. Rothstein and any other attorney, employee or agent of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein relating to any investment or potential investment in any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 13. My and all documents, including but not limited to, emails, data, correspondence, written + +agreements or memos between and any other attorney, employee or agent of RRA regarding Jeffrey Epstein relating to any investment or potential investment in any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +- 14. Any and all agreements or documents, including but not limited to, emails, correspondence and memos which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and Scott W. Rothstein. +- 15. Any and all agreements or documents, including but not limited to, emails, ndence and memos which were provided to or received from an investor orpotential inves Wig to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and J. +- 16. Any and all agreements or documents, including but not limited to and memos which were provided to or received from an investor or pot case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any employee, +- 17. Any and all documents which were shown to or receiv attorneys and those related persons purporting to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 18. Any and all agreements or documents, in and memos which were provided to or receiv case (real or fabricated involvin: Jeffrey any entity formed by J. ea to invest in any plaintiff's case again +- 19. Any and all documents to solicit "investors" ,correspondence tor relating to any r attorney with RRA. investors, potential investors, g or contemplated) involving b not limited to, emails, correspondence vector or potential investor relating to any ad19 any employee, agent, member or officer of vestment opportunities for third party investors pstein. able to any investor or potential investor by J. case involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 20. Any and all doct l made available to any investor or potential investor by Scott W. Rothstein to solicit Thves for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 21. Any attorney o ments made available to any investor or potential investor by any employee, RRA to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 22. r • all documents made available to any investor or potential investor by any employee, attorney o. • gent of any entity owned by Scott W. Rothstein to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 23. Any and all documents reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. +- 24. Any and all documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property to + +investors from Jeffrey Epstein by way of RRA for the settlement of any case, real or fabricated, against Jeffrey Epstein. + +25. Any and all documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property to investors from Jeffrey Epstein by way of Scott W. Rothstein for the settlement of any case, real or fabricated, against Jeffrey Epstein. + +26. Any and all documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds o property to investors from Jeffrey Epstein by way of any entity owned by Scott W. Rothstein fa settlement of any case, real or fabricated, against Jeffrey Epstein. + +27. Any and all documents relating to any investment, joint-venturCAustness enterprise involving RRA that reference any claim, real or fabricated, against JgffreyF tein. + +28. The entire bankruptcy file In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt 8&d + +29. All files pertaining to cases, real or fabricated, again tj tey Epstein which were shown to any "investors" or potential investors to solicit investment op"pottunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein Sk + +14/ 30. All Q-Task Projects that refer to Jeffr / c titt ftw te . + +31. All Q-Task Projects that refer to ., E ., or Jane Doc. + +32. An em loyment agreeme rrespondence describing compensation benefits for during his e with RRA. + +33. All documents from the rtress" software program that refer or relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +34. All docume ts fro the "Fortress" software program that refer or relate to L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. + +35. A referral of Jeffrey ents and contracts between Mr. Howell and relating to the f, E.W. and any other cases (pending or contemplated) purporting to relate to + +36. Any agreements and contracts between Mr. Howell and RRA relating to the referral of Plaintiff, E.W. and any other cases (pending or contemplated) purporting to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +37. Any agreements and contracts between Paul Cassell and relating to the referral of any cases (pending or contemplated) purporting to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. + +- purported litigation (pending or contemplated) in +- 38. Any agreements and contracts between Paul Cassell and RRA relating to the referral of any cases (pending or contemplated) purporting to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 39. Any and all documents of Blue Line Research & Development, LIZ relating to the referral of any cases (pending or contemplated) purporting to relate to Jeffrey Epstein. +- 40. Any and all documents of Clockwork Capital Advisers pertaining to any investments relating to any purported litigation (pending or contemplated) involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 41. Any and all documents of Razorback Funding pertaining to any investmfl% rela 'rig to any purported litigation (pending or contemplated) involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 42. Any and all documents of Fortress Investments pertaining to anyyihJ pEnts relating to any purported litigation (pending or contemplated) involving Jeffrey Eps +- 43. Any and all documents of Fortress Capital pertainin investments relating to any purported litigation (pending or contemplated) involving J tein. +- 44. Any and all documents of Drawbridge Capit S in tir g to any investments relating to any + - J ey Epstein. +- 45. Any and all documents of Drawbrid pertaining to any investments relating to any purported litigation (pending or contem lying Jeffrey Epstein. +- 46. Any and all documents of estment Fund pertaining to any investment relating to any purported litigation (pendi plated) involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 47. Any and all documents of etfturion Credit Fund pertaining to any investment relating to any purported litigation (pen contemplated) involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 48. Any and cumefits of Platinum Management Fund pertaining to any investment relating to any purpo n (pending or contemplated) involving Jeffrey Epstein. +- 49. Th on of Jeffrey Epstein taken on March 17, 2010. +- 50. Th eposition including all exhibits of J. taken on March 24, 2010. +- 51. All interrogatories served on J. and responses thereto. 52.. All Requests for Admissions served on J. and responses thereto. +- 53. All Requests for Admissions served on J. and responses thereto. + +- 54. All documents produced by J. in response to Requests for Production. +- 55. All documents and emails produced by the bankruptcy trustee In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. +- 56. All Interrogatories served on Scott W. Rothstein and responses thereto. +- 57. All Requests for Admissions served on Scott W. Rothstein and responses the to. +- 58. All Requests for Production served on Scott W. Rothstein and responseret +- 59. Plaintiff reserves his right to supplement this list of exhibits. + +CO + +## CERTIFICATE I F SERV + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct co of August, 2010 to P going was mailed this 23 dca + +Gary Jr., E , Jaffe, Weissing, sq. , Fistos 'PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Bamh & -C)\* S c ley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33 + +Jack A. GoldbergeCEsq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australi nue South Suite 14 West Palrft-Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: Jesph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] + +Fla. Bar No. 195677 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +NOTA CERTIFIED CB1 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68668a3fb9a3e6bc98606bb7fbbefbdd116309f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032/EFTA02764032.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,666 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764032.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 18260, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 337.05, + 79.325 + ], + [ + 561.75, + 79.325 + ], + [ + 561.75, + 121.07499999999999 + ], + [ + 337.05, + 121.07499999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.45, + 317.3 + ], + [ + 503.97, + 317.3 + ], + [ + 503.97, + 332.33000000000004 + ], + [ + 144.45, + 332.33000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.69, + 404.97499999999997 + ], + [ + 359.52000000000004, + 404.97499999999997 + ], + [ + 359.52000000000004, + 417.5 + ], + [ + 285.69, + 417.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.468, + 414.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 353.1, + 414.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 353.1, + 428.355 + ], + [ + 291.468, + 428.355 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE I F SERV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.75, + 316.386 + ], + [ + 403.17600000000004, + 316.386 + ], + [ + 403.17600000000004, + 330.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 240.75, + 330.9735412597656 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764032" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c504bc65b076f12cb51ad7dcb91515a430729b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XVOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT RCYTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to by Counsel) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint' Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated be the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County C h 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: a ndantlounter-Plaintiff\_J. October 26, 2017, Motion for five Order [D.E. 1026; 1027] + +S Plaintipoft7sCitioounn to ter-Defendant JmeffreotioynEfpsor pro tein's huitveuara irda 10, 2018,mRoestipoonnstoe O and e ii Compel E.W. to Answer Questions Relating to the Crimes Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen Deposition [D.E. 1141] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. January 12, 2018, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel E.W. to Answer Questions Relating to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen Discovery [D.E. 1143] + +DATE: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O AS + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 25, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINKitra ACH, PA 155 i iii7 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 1 each, Florida 33401 [1) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +ir/s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeap ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c mo tniento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de hoj tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama d de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 1 e dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunale rmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo an s kis\* comparecencia que se ha voz, llame al 711." k programado es menos de 7 dias; si ust e\ e & capacitation del oido o de la + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..581f67c6211dfc9f11a0c2fcaf1176cc73d4ca06 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045/EFTA02764045.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764045.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7508, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING \n(Date Agreed to by Counsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O AS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.0420227050781, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 468.0420227050781, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764045" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b37b49d1e0786e344d0592d5e872231af8aafd67 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti the following hearing at the time stated be Court at the Palm Beach County Palm Beach, Florida 33401: .3r Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +MOTION: Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit 132 [D.E. mounter-Plaintiff \_J. J. = January t 18, 2018, Motion + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifYCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to by Counsel) + +aintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition [to be filed] + +1c• Tuesday, February 20, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O S + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 25, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINKitra ACH, PA 155 i iii7 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 1 each, Florida 33401 [1) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +rk /s/ Scott., Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeapi ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento parns poder participar en este procedimiento, usted Ilene de ho, tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama ilidad de ponerse en e contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwalq Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19/m \ dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted time discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon you akte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..794c1326d66e6b468aa3722ea3c6fd201948fa8b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049/EFTA02764049.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764049.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7170, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING \n(Date Agreed to by Counsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 454.420654296875, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 454.420654296875, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764049" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3b6cee608cf0122380a0a554227f3a566076701 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint' the following hearing at the time stated be Court at the Palm Beach County Palm Beach, Florida 33401: Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X30004BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to b Counsel) + +MOTION: PI tifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's October 5, 2017, Motion for Sa Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Aga i i t Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant J. and His Counsel [D.E. 1009] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. November 8, 2017, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Sanctions [D.E. 1041] + +Thursday, February 15, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on January 25, 2018, through the Court' Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). cattorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LINKitra ACH, PA 155 i iii7 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 1 each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +ir/s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted a una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento pan poder participar en ate procedimiento, usted tiene de ho1 tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la a makhdad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 194,17 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi Oren akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o e okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko akte ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat o ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin r a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke si u gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..449dc9cb5ae1622c59b6781b548c5488d12cb4b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053/EFTA02764053.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764053.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7306, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING \n(Date Agreed to b Counsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 438.5708923339844, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 438.5708923339844, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764053" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebdbdcb3dfe7e2519fe38db7b823c2087cda2af0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO 4S-A + +.,A + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to b Counsel) + +r PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint' Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated belo the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County g, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: PI tiffitounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's November 7, 2017, Su ntal Motion to Compel Discovery [D.E. 1039] + +(S Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff t J. November 15, 2017, esponse in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel + O Discovery [D.E. 1064] + +> PlaintiWCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's September 25, 2017, Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [D.E. 985] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 28, 2017, Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [D.E. 1002] + +DATE: Thursday, February 8, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by-te i? hone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the rel' ' sou ht in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to a mp solve this matter. + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +One or more of the parties who may be V e the motion are self represented. + +I certify that the foregoing documen Service List below on January 25, 2018, Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b furnished to the attorneys listed on the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +INK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [frucj + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelalalinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina(alinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

████ J. ████
████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho, -sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama i "dad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19.tne dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." y r + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou akte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..475835fc7f10aab9097978b0407e6d964e11a689 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057/EFTA02764057.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764057.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7427, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING\n(Date Agreed to b Counsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764057" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24a46aeb8f5b3fdacb77ce75da78a3a6e402f0a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint' the following hearing at the time stated be Court at the Palm Beach County Palm Beach, Florida 33401: Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XVOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifYCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to bit Counsel) + +MOTION: unter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, M Compel Substantive Responses to Request to Produce Served ? sp:5, e 2011 [D.E. 972]. + +> tiff J. September 21, 2017, fe Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Request to Produce Served December 21, 2012 [D.E. 973] + ++0 + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Requests for Admissions Served February 26, 2013 [D.E. 974] + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Interrogatories Served December 21, 2012 [D.E. 975] + +PlaintifCounter-Defendant Jeffrey stein's November 27, 2017, Omnibus Response in Opposition to Four Motions to Compel [D.E. 1091] + +DATE: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone will all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the prep effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. towei(s)pr a good-jeilth + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in perso or telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected e f sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-m to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who nms, affected kr the motion are self represented. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 25, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnh 2139 Palm Beach Lakes~itlevard West Palm Beach, );L 33 scare la m efendant/Counter-Plaintiff ards Shipley, P.A. + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr2 Primary: Scott®lin ockljtw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +TrtdrCounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbtaFLAnpellateLaw.com Co-Counselor lendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tanuny Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeap ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c mo miento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de hoi tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama d de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 1 e dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunale rmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo an d ta comparecencia que se ha voz, llame al 711." i, programado es menos de 7 dias; si uste\ e discapacitacion del oido o de la + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d9fbae79bbde62c2d8f35c2aa1635dc6aaa3e92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061/EFTA02764061.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764061.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6636, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING \n(Date Agreed to bit Counsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 387.3855895996094, + 356.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 210.363037109375 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 210.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 443.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764061" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a4f1aa6f044462d935ef853c905ebf83e9abe651 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.md @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, EMI J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +cos + +# MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGINA ION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information pursuant to the Court's-Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts dated January 5, 2018, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +1. On January 5, 2018, the Court entered its Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts, which required Epstein to produce, for attorneys' and client's eyes only, the following information: (a) the number of sexual abuse claims that Epstein settled in the two years prior to December 7, 2009; (b) the aggregate settlement monies paid for the cases settled in the two years prior to December 7, 2009; (c) the number of sexual abuse claims that Epstein settled after December 7, 2009; and (d) the aggregate settlement monies paid for the cases settled after December 7, 2009. A copy of the Court's Order is attached hereto as Exhibit `A'. + +adv. Epstein Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +2. On January 24, 2018, Epstein produced this court-ordered information to by way of a document titled `Confidential, for Attorneys' and Client's Eyes Only Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information.' + +3. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Order, is required to any fit ppropriate motion to lift the confidentiality designation prior to using of this info ASn durin g future hearings or at trial. See Ex. `A'. + +4. MI now seeks to lift the confidentiality designati cherning the aggregate number of claims settled by Epstein before and after this malicious lawsuit was filed. Specifically, intends to rely upon and use the number of churns Wat Epstein settled in the two years prior to December 7, 2009 and the number of claims that were settled after December 7, 2009 at future hearings and at trial, as this inform on istighly relevant to Epstein's motive in filing this malicious and unfounded lawsuit against ?wards. + +5. It has been Ethitards' contention from the very beginning that one of Epstein's primary motives in filitigthis lawsuit was to intimidate his child victims into cheaply compromising or ab'andoning their sexual molestation claims against Epstein. The number of claims that had eitady been settled prior to this malicious lawsuit is highly relevant to this motive as it de tes the predicament that Epstein faced immediately before filing this malicious lawsuit against Epstein had already settled a considerable number of claims and he knew that many more victims were still out there. He was angry, and he sought to go on the offensive against the remaining child victims in order to intimidate and silence them. Epstein quite clearly + +adv. Epstein Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAC + +did not want to repeat the settlement history that pre-dated this maliciously filed lawsuit. He needed to change the narrative. + +6. The number of sexual misconduct claims that were settled after the filing of this malicious lawsuit is relevant to demonstrate the significant financial exposure that: s. faced on December 7, 2009, which he attempted to reduce by suing an attorney re csuing some of his victims ia) as well as one of the victims herself (L.M.). The OM as lready ruled that lc\_\_ Le I I, the number of claims Epstein faced at the time he filed and continueri this malicious lawsuit is admissible. See Order on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff A's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section D (References to Cases Not Litigated ds), entered on January 16, 2018. is nonetheless including this request "SAy confidentiality that may exist as to the settled claims the post-date the filing of ious lawsuit, in an abundance of caution. See Ex. `A'. + +WHEREFORE, Counte Plafi l. LEM, respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting thisMotion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of - Confidential Settlement Information, as well as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26th day of January, 2018. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +David P. Vitale Jr. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFY + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore temus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. ██████████ ("██████████") the following: + 1. a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 2. b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 3. c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*The court has reviewed the hearing transcript and the corresponding orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's oral rulings at the subject hearing. @* + +Ex. A + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "Co ial, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b • cTa to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. 777 + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in tin itidation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' ients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connection,•• h tion, hearing, deposition or trial, / I before any such information is quoted, disclosed, Ygjie ipon or used, the party must file a Motion to have the information or documents de t be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under sea ante with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclo ce or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. + +4. The Court d erulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amo disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlement of an three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against M. No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of lila three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to Ma three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclo re of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under se I rdance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epsterfk • . ashall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in cti . + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Pal' ounty, Florida this clay 210/4/PL of ercerfi&--r; 20131 + +> DONALD W. HAFELE IR T CO UDGE + +### RVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola -Inv Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Banthart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes 13oulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +meprrksearcylav,..com jsxQsearevlaw.com nisaFLAAimellateLaw.com scarolateamrkorevlaw.com kbtOFLADpellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff I + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff" I + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 mare Thnuriklaw.corn + +brad@eallc.com staffiefiletnathotoiustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaa5b85bd243a134e14a6c770d82ccd8b27ad2a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066/EFTA02764066.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,467 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764066.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 12247, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 71.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 71.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGINA ION OF EPSTEIN'S \nDISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.548, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 500.5823974609375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 500.5823974609375, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 132.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 506.73599999999993, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 506.73599999999993, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 324.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 447.4102783203125 + ], + [ + 344.68902587890625, + 447.4102783203125 + ], + [ + 344.68902587890625, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 460.89 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 360 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764066" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04cb9ca32ccc6a2c56c70bddbcb1920473547ace --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +A" + +## NOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING + +Pursuant to Rule 2.420(d)(2), Fla. R. Jud. Admin., the filer of a court record at the time of filing shall indicate whether any confid?ntial information is included within the document being filed; identify the confidentiality provion that applies to the identified information; and identify the precise location of the confidential information within the document being filed. + +Title/Type of Docutnent(s): + +Motion to Make Court Records Confidential [filed 1.26.18) + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all counsel on the attached Counsel List, this day of Ja4LWILI, 20,18 As P + +alleS" + +JACK OLA + +Flon r No.: 169440 + +Atto E-Mail(s): jsx@searc m; and @searcylaw.co + +Pnmary E-Mail: \_scarolateam carcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (56 686-6300 + +Fax: -9451 + +Atto J. + +6)\* + +,SP + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing + +Page 4 of 4 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..784b738356aa50e34a6b83f5c1e511c21a3871fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076/EFTA02764076.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764076.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3170, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 367.74 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 142.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764076" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8407f4d07cb909ff032e5eb3d1a109de42d02fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO REARING + +Go + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon ent of the parties, Plaintiff 'Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby cancel wing hearing at the time stated below, before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, ourt at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Co m 10 est Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: P1 tifFCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's November 22, 2017, Request for 'al Notice + +(SDefendant/Counter-Plaintiff t J. December 4, 2017, equest for Judicial Notice + +Tuesday, January 30, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 29, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr2 Primary: Scott®lin ockljtw.com Primary: Ka linkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +(SS1 E' rCounsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18b6f78feb7225233b287b82ac86cd7ed64d94af --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080/EFTA02764080.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764080.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4750, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 71.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 71.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO \nREARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 446.6718444824219, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 446.6718444824219, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764080" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96ab6995ef1a5ba75ca87c1c07fd7dd5f69b1f7e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. O S + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAkNQTICE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a") December 4, 2017, Requ est\ odicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. [D.E. 110 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey been advised of the agreement oft& p it is hereby Th Court, having reviewed the Request, csponse in Opposition [D.E. 1157], and having + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Request is GRANTED. The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the Complaints filed in the twenty-five lawsuits identified in Request for Judicial Notice for authenticity purposes. The parties' respective rights to raise any other objections, including admissibility, are hereby preserved and may be raised at trial. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach gty, Florida this3Oday of January, 2018. + +> THE HONO CIRCUIT CO3 NALD W. HAFELE + +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order Granting Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] *J.* +[REDACTED] Request for Judicial Notice +Page 2 + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..903903abf22fb2606a800e7a8af85e21e613c4a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083/EFTA02764083.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764083.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 6172, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.55, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. \nREQUEST FOR JUDICIAkNQTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 527.03076171875, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 527.03076171875, + 326.6029968261719 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 326.6029968261719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 152.28 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764083" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c875547aafa9dad4612b0b75916debf3a29f28e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") November 22, 2017, Request for Judicial Notice. [D.E. 1088.] The Court, having reviewed the Request, having been advised (f agreement of the parties, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJ the Request is GRANTED. The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the following rt actions and all court filings made in those actions for authenticity purposes only: + +- 1. ,lane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein; United States District Court, Southern District of lori a, Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM e Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein; United States District Coup, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON +- 3. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein; United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No. 9:08-cv-81092-KAM +- 4. E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein; 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB + +of January, 2018. DONE AND ORDERED in West " timach,ai Palm B IrMo lorida this ac.) day + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Agreed Order Granting Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jcffrey Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice Page 2 + +- 5. L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein; 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2008-CA-028051-X XXX-MB +- 6. United States of America v. Scott IV. Rothstein (Forfeiture Action); United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 0:09-CV-61780-WJZ +- 7. Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE +- 8. United States v. Rothstein; United States District C ,44Southern District of Florida, Case No. 0:09-cr-60331-JIC +- 9. Jane Does I and 2 v. United States, United Stat 'ct Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnso + +The parties' respective rights to raise any oC c,rl hereby preserved and may be raised at trial. ons, including admissibility, are + +> C THE HONORAB DT AL 1.W. HAFELE CIRCUIT CO JUDGE + +This action was not on Epstein's original Request for Judicial Notice, but the parties agree that the Court may take judicial notice of it. + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order Granting Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice +Page 3 + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e41251d37e157449d0268b620fabf840ffc8505c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085/EFTA02764085.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764085.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 7468, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 489.3350830078125, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 489.3350830078125, + 326.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 326.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 152.28 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764085" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54ee83dede77f0bcb30d600ec967e1530e74f6c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION +FOR CONTINUANCE OF JURY TRIAL** + +FILED +2010 SEP - 2 PM 3:40 +STARON R. BOCIL CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**THIS CAUSE**, having come before the Court during the hearing for Status Conference scheduled for August 20, 2010, upon Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of the Jury Trial presently set in this case for the Eight Week Jury Trial Docket beginning October 25, 2010, and calendar call set for October 15, 2010. The Court having reviewed the Motion and hearing argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it hereby, + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of the Jury Trial in this case is hereby + +The Motion is granted. The matter is +removed from the docket beginning Oct 25, 2010 +and reset on the docket beginning March 7, 2011 +Calendar call is scheduled at 9:00 A.M Feb 25, 2010 + +*On 8 week docket Rm 9C P.B. Cty Courthouse.* + +**DONE AND ORDERED** this 2nd day of August, 2010 West Palm Beach, Palm Beach +County, Florida. + +*Sent* + +![]()DAVID F. CROW +Circuit Judge + +Copies furnished: + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Gary M. [REDACTED] Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ee12d778dc91a32480f6f4684e7c43579b49cb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088/EFTA02764088.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764088.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2148, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 335.766, + 118.99599999999998 + ], + [ + 559.182, + 118.99599999999998 + ], + [ + 559.182, + 161.734 + ], + [ + 335.766, + 161.734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.576, + 357.826 + ], + [ + 428.856, + 357.826 + ], + [ + 428.856, + 385.48 + ], + [ + 210.576, + 385.48 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764088" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80cbbc868707c33f3373e9baf0771ef53bc5e959 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER GRA•NPINGIDENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on January 31, 2018, on the Court's Uniform Motion Calendar upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") January 10, 2018, Motion to Reopen Discovery to Take Depositions. [D.E. 1142.] The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the Respon tion filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. [D.E. 1144], havin ment of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND 1/>bGED that the Motion is GRANT + +a cAtts5 5-64tS ms.fri + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm B h r ounty, Florida this ✓//day of January, 20,18. + +> THE H NALD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT • RT GE + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0efb26ad701eadc0cc2ffc4d5ea064695a1a5903 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090/EFTA02764090.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764090.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 5698, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRA\u2022NPINGIDENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 533.8464965820312, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 533.8464965820312, + 325.863037109375 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 325.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 151.47 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764090" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9838272a184bc2426688c62c614d4a927c44761f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.md @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X300CMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J FFRE EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFEND COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR PROPOUND LIMITED REQUESTS FO ION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey ste psteini, responds in opposition to the Motion for Leave to Propound Limi 1098] filed by Defendant/Coun C .) fti ;'Bradley for Admission dated December 1, 2017 [D.E. + +#### I3ACKGROUND + +Discovery is over urt Order dated July 20, 2017, this Court special set the trial of this matter for D ber 5, 2017. [D.E. 938.] In doing so, the Court ordered that the deadline to complete was set for 10 days before trial. Id. at H. That meant, discovery had to be comp ovember 27, 2017, making written requests due by October 27, 2017. + +Although the Court granted Epstein's request for a continuance of the trial and reset the special set trial to March 13, 2018, it did not specifically address the Motion's second part which sought an extension of the pretrial deadlines. [D.E. 1035; 1057.] opposed any pretrial deadline extension and affirmatively moved to reconfirm the original pretrial deadlines. [D.E. 1059.] In his Motion, argued that, "The order resetting the trial did not alter any pretrial deadlines including the discovery cutoff date" and objected "to any effort to expand existing deadlines." Id. On November 27, 2017, the Court agreed with and granted Motion finding that, "to the extent that wholesale additional discovery will not be permitted but individual discovery requests may be allowed on a matter-by-matter basi only if the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's ruling on motions currently pen be heard ...." [D.E. 1086, e.s.] + +Despite having asked this Court to enforce the discovery cuto 2017, moved for leave to serve Requests for Admissi r15 9., response to his Request for Judicial Notice of a New Yo t) o er registry triggered the need for the additional discovery in order for Epstein to 8h 4 ' e the website printout and confirm its accuracy. [D.E. 1098.] Specifically, Edw4t closed Requests for Admission would ask Epstein to admit the following: 0 , on December 1, argues that Epstein's + +- a. Admit that the registration Notice Purs dated Noveni \* your New York State Sex Offender ed to Request for Judicial orida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203, 2017, is authentic. Sex Offender registration page attached to the information contained in the printout of tuislew t for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 0.202 and 90.203, dated November 8, 2017, is accurate. + +### ARGUMENT + +# Inadmissible and Prejudicial + +First, Epstein objects to any reference to or admissibility of the New York State Sex Offender registration information at trial because it is irrelevant and prejudicial. §§ 90.401, 90.403, Fla. Stat. The non-admissibility issue is the subject of a separate Motion) + +Motion Fails to Meet Court Requirements to Reopen Discs nd Seeks Preferential Treatment + +Second, and procedurally, cannot have it both ways. As made clear in its November 27, 2017, Order and at a subsequent hearing resulting ificantly prejudicial and adverse ruling to Epstein, discovery is closed. Specificall requested leave to disclose his expert witness, Culver (Skip) M, III, Esq., bas cd,\"n urt's rulings at extensive pretrial hearings held November 29, December 5 and urging to again enforce the on pre al deadlines, this Court denied Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expe and referred to the pretrial deadlines with no prejudice analysis. [D.E. 1119 urging the Court's denial, cited this Court's requirements regarding reopemn overy: "...but individual discovery requests may be allowed on a matter by mat bas y if the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's ruling on to be heard ...." [D.E. 1086, c.s.] b 7, 2017. On January 17, 2018, at + +can be no dispute that it has been who has repeatedly opposed any extension pretrial deadlines. counsel knew for years of the registration site and had previously indicated he wanted it for purposes of identifying Epstein's "assets...through those sex offender registration disclosures...." (12/5/17 Tr. 202:11-203:3).2 longstanding + +&#x27; Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information. + +2 Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit A. + +knowledge of the registration site (and potential hearsay obstacles) is not this Court's problem to remedy. had many years to seek these discovery requests/admissions and his current trial evidentiary conundrum was simply not caused by any ruling by this Court on motions pending for the November/December pretrial hearings. + +There is simply no justification for belated request. has rovided no legitimate reason for this Court to extend an expired discovery deadline to permit E s to serve Requests for Admissions that easily could have propounded anyti the preceding eight years. This is particularly true, where the Court just recently de n's well-founded request for relief from the discovery deadline based entirely c ) e t-year duration of this matter. Epstein's well-founded hearsay objection to Ed 14 )' uest for Judicial Notice does not warrant extension of the discovery cutoff. Epste' i ils, ' on certainly was not caused by any ruling of this Court, but rather by the obviou ( s ' S e p ty of seeking to introduce into evidence irrelevant and unduly prejudicial New 3 If the Court grants IM late Request for Admission and requires Epstein to substantively answer, Epstein would consistently assert his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976); Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 29, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 brad@eplIc.com marc@nuriklaw.com staff.efile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counselor De J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 ,1OAlk" West Palm Beach, FL 33401 smahoneye.agwpa.com Co igoldbergereagwpa.com -Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ..agia. + +O + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOLUO 7 + +# TRANSC Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 sex-offender registrations. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: May we stop there? + +3 THE COURT: Yes. + +4 MS. ROCKENBACH: Before we stop, Your Honor, was about to rule on 60 through 62. + +6 7 8 THE COURT: Sixty through 62 is sustained for the reasons that I've alr earlier indicated on the record. + +9 10 Sixty-three. Epstein's sex o fen er registrations. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, a Mr. Epstein's sex offe gastration, particularly in th of New York -- I'm not sure the ex t which it applies elsewhere -- obliged to disclose his ownershi nte est in vehicles, airplanes and sidences, that is, he had to list all tho things. And one of the ways that rave identified Jeffrey Epstein's assets s through those sex offender registration disclosures that he was obliged make and did make. + +23 24 25 So it has to do with punitive damages in addition, perhaps, to something else. But it has to do with punitive damages in + +particular. + +THE COURT: I will take a look at that when the time comes, if it comes at all. + +Thank you. + +Booking photographs. Again, same ruling as I made on the other matters regarding the criminal aspects of the c + +MR. SCAROLA: This would simply photograph, Your Honor. + +> THE COURT: What's its r ncy? + +\ MR. SCAROLA: I'm no r. Epstein is going to be here. + +THE COURT: ATanning 'Ss to subpoena him? + +MR. SCt No, sir. No. If he chooses e here, I have videotaped depo 'tion. + +COURT: That's fine. + +!Sy MR. SCAROLA: I want to be able to Alith, 0 dentify him as the person who got convicted. + +> THE COURT: It could be duplicative of a video. + +MR. SCAROLA: It may be. Again, I just want to explain to Your Honor that's why \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..200728bd9e3e06c9d9ee79caf493a2cedaccb996 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092/EFTA02764092.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764092.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 13363, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J FFRE EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFEND COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION FOR PROPOUND LIMITED \nREQUESTS FO ION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 506.91217041015625, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 506.91217041015625, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I3ACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 352.17333984375, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 352.17333984375, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 345.03802490234375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 345.03802490234375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Inadmissible and Prejudicial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 250.90310668945312, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 250.90310668945312, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein is Not the Proper Person to Authenticate or Confirm Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 464.0296936035156, + 71.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 464.0296936035156, + 86.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 86.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "eN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.3399963378906, + 403.38 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 403.38 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 417.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 258.3399963378906, + 417.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 456.8399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC 1 This is a reference to Dr. Jansen's report, dated October 20, 2017, which was attached as Exhibit H to Epstein's Motion to Strike. His curriculum vitae was submitted as an exhibit to his deposition on December 1, 2017 (Depo. pp. 4-5) + +(Report, p.24). In addition, he has over 20 years of experience in the United States Military dealing with computer science issues (Report, p.76). Dr. Jansen has authored over 250 academic publications focusing in the area of web analytics and related topics (Report, pp.28-39). Most recently, Dr. Jansen was the testifying expert in the highly publicized trial of the sports reporter Erin Andrews's suit against Marriott International, where he was qualified as an expe to analyze the dissemination of the unauthorized video of Ms. Andrews on the Internet (R 7). + +Dr. Jansen is highly qualified to render an opinion in this case.~2l that he has performed in this case is entirely within his area of expertise, as desert fully in his curriculum vitae. nd outlined more + +Dr. Jansen was retained to analyze the extent of ,c e 'i i nation on the Internet of the malicious accusations against raised in E pp.3-4). Dr. Jansen limited his work to inclu filed until the day of his report in Oct 20 (Report, p.5). During that time, the primary uit (Depo, pp. 6-10, 18, Report; on from the date Epstein's lawsuit was allegations contained exclusively suit, i.e. that was involved in Rothstein's criminal conduct, has been incidded id 4 online media sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669,542 da rs (Depo. p.16; Report, p.5). As explained in detail in his report and again in his sition, Dr. Jansen conducted his web analytic work using the most reliable and conscrva r. roach in the industry (Depo. pp.71-81). + +en explained that it is not possible to look at the traffic to a page for a certain day or to view the readerships of a specific article (Depo., pp.48-49).2 Dr. Jansen therefore determined average daily traffic to a given site over the period of a week or a month (Depo., 48; Report, p.15). + +2 This is a reference to the transcript of Dr. Jansen's deposition, taken on December I, 2017, which was attached as Exhibit E to Epstein's Motion to Strike. + +These figures are what are used in the industry to determine daily readership of websites (Depo., p.53; Report, p.10). + +Dr. Jansen took several measures to ensure his analysis was conservative. For example, he used the lowest number for the unique daily visitor count reported by the web analytic services so that the numbers would not be inflated. His conservative approach also involved ex fining only on-line sources and not any print or broadcast media that included the informs question (Depo. p.74-76). Dr. Jansen also did not include articles on websites for ' as unable to verify the visitor data to confirm the number of users (Depo. pp. 78-7 .6). So, out of the 74 sites that contained articles with the language in question, ' lu the traffic of only 58% in his potential daily visitors total because he could not A to traffic numbers for the other 42% (Depo. p.78). He did not include numbers fo ill u s I ., rticles published by the same site with different publication dates (Depo. p.80). d not include the counts of those people who may have been searching using a ' ch Google and saw the allegations in the search results listing (Depo. p.80). + +Additionally, Dr. Ja did of include numbers for any dissemination of Epstein's malicious accusations be at of the actual visitors to the site in question. Thus, he did not count any times t i ticles ere emailed or linked to another story not including the language in question her Dc ., p.79-80; Report, p.6), or any face-to face dissemination (Depo., p.78; Report, P.6). + +Finally, as to the conservative aspect of Dr. Jansen's search, he did not include dissemination of Epstein's false allegations against contained in the book Filthy Rich by James Patterson and John Connolly (Depo., p.76; Report, p.6). This book was an account of the rise and fall (so far) of Jeffrey Epstein and includes the allegations raised by Epstein that was involved in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +## LEGAL ARGUMENT + +# A. Basic Standards for Admission of Expert Testimony + +Section 90.702, Florida Statutes, dealing with the admission of expert testimo provides: + +If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the t rt fac n understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue, a witn ecl as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may ut it in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if: + +- (1) The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or da Aca +- (3) The witness has applied the principles h reliably to the facts of the case. +- (2) The testimony is the product of reliable prin t ethods; and iiiriik + +Here, Epstein argues only that Dr. J "Si ony is not relevant to any fact in issue and will not assist the trier of fact in un nd' the evidence or in determining a fact in issue. + +### B. Dr. Jansen's Testimo Vile as it will Assist the Jury in Determining Plaintiff's Damage + +A claim for malic non is considered a personal tort. Cate v. Oldham, 450 So.2d 224, 227 (Fla. 1984 iting tun Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926). "The gravam e tion is injury to character." Bros., 109 So. at 227 (citing Tidwell v. Withers Ffa. 359, 360-61 (1885)). As Epstein acknowledges (Motion, p.12), damages in a malicio rosecution action include damages to reputation, shame, humiliation, and mental anguish. Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. =, 109 So. 623, 626 (Ha. 1926); Ware v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 1442, 1471 (M.D. Fla. 1997Xrecognizing that "injury to ... reputation, shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings flowing from ... prosecution" are all damages resulting from malicious prosecution); see also Tackett Plastics, Inc. v. Bowsmith, Inc., + +614 So.2d 30, 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993Xrecognizing that harm to reputation, humiliation, embarrassment, and mental suffering are valid damages in malicious prosecution action); Turkey Creek Inc. v. , 567 So.2d 943, 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), approved, 609 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 1992)(noting that harm to reputation is a valid element of damages for malicious prosecution); City of Coconut Creek v. =, 474 So.2d 820, 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)(explzi ing that a malicious prosecution is "a very ancient remedy" to right a harm to reputation). + +Many of these elements of damages in malicious prosecution c Tire, the same as elements of damages in defamation claims. See Gertz v. Robert We 18 U.S. 323, 350 (1974); Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp., 431 So. 2d (Ha. 5th DCA 1983), approved, 467 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1985); Miami Herald Pub ,,Cti) , 423 So.2d 376, 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), approved, 458 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 198 ,Sz, o Fla. Stan. Jury Instruct. 405.10 (damages for defamation include injury to ; itst • n " hame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings). Thus, the fact that some ents damages raised here and the evidence used to prove such damages may be the e ' defamation case, does not support Epstein's' claim that is disguising an i i ible defamation claim within this malicious prosecution action. + +In a malt pro ZIP' tion case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stated (Browning v. Ray, 440 P.2d 721 a Ida. 1968)): + +I damages for injury to reputation and emotional or mental distress, the pr e amount of which by their very nature is almost impossible of proof and which damages almost certainly result if one has been maliciously prosecuted, may be awarded if plaintiff has established the other essential elements of an action for malicious prosecution. We recognize that the amount of such damages for injury to reputation and for distress will be determined, at least in major part, by the gravity of the offense charged and the publicity given the prosecution of plaintiff. + +See also Shweitzer v.M, 456 P.2d 882, 884 (N.M. App. 1968) (citing Browning for same principle). + +Additionally, courts have evaluated the propriety of damage awards in malicious prosecution cases based, in part, on the amount of publicity attendant to the scurrilous charges. See Colegrove v. City of Corning, 388 N.Y. S.2d 964 (N.Y.A.D. 1976) (damages fo malicious prosecution and false arrest were not excessive based on, inter alia, the "a t adverse publicity" and its effect on the plaintiff, his wife and his children); Hardin yell, 695 S.W. 2d 189 (Tenn. App. 1985) (damages awarded in malicious prosecutio cessive because, inter alia, "the widespread publicity" of the charges); Zenik v. 0' n, A.2d 769 (Conn. 1951) (damages awarded in malicious prosecution case not t based on the "widespread publicity" attendant of litigation). In fact, the failure i 1115, v nt the publicity associated with the wrongful litigation can be relied on as a factor • laintiff's damages. See v. Soileau, 448 So.2d 1268 (La. 1984). + +Epstein has not cited a sin c i Iding that the extent of the publicity associated with the wrongful litigation is not a per e ement of damages in a malicious prosecution case. + +With respect to D n, it is clear he is an expert on the dissemination of information on the internet an C has ed his expertise to track the dissemination of the injurious content of Epstein's w y filed lawsuit. As his testimony clearly demonstrated, he focused on the subjec f the false allegations that was involved in the criminal activity of Rothstein and the underlying Ponzi scheme. Tracking the dissemination of that information, which emanated from the wrongful lawsuit filed by Epstein, requires an expert given the technical complexities of tracking data on the internet. + +The information provided by Dr. Jansen is certainly outside the purview of the typical juror. Evidence requiring technical computer knowledge beyond the expertise of a typical lay juror as to an issue in the case is generally admissible. See Marten Transp., Ltd. v. Plattform Advert, Inc., 184 F. Supp. 3d 1006, 1010 (D. Kan. 2016) (holding that testimony of computer consultant with experience in computer forensics and data recovery offered expertise beyond that of the typical lay juror concerning search techniques, including the use of intemet archives, wo elpful to a jury); Khoday v. Symantec Corp., 93 F. Supp. 3d 1067, 1073 (D. Minn. 2 C5 ended (Apr. 15, 2015Xholding that testimony of web archive manager admissi knowledge of the website archiving and retrieval process wo ffe understanding the issues in the case). c his specialized sistance to the jury in + +Epstein argues that Dr. Jansen's testimony iw' il9rd e the trier of fact because he did not testify whether the malicious suit filed aga' ( s /Scr , s by Epstein caused shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt f • gs otion, p.14). This argument is misplaced. All relevant evidence is admissible. § 4 . idence is relevant if it tends to prove or disprove a material fact. §90.401. Here, 's testimony is relevant to the issue of damages suffered prosecution of Because the extent of the dissemination pstein bears directly on how much "shame, humiliation, and mental as a result of Epstein's of the false clai anguish" as suffered. + +en testified at his deposition that the allegations raised in Epstein's suit against that he was a participant in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme were disseminated on 74 media sites in 104 different articles. Based upon conservative figures, Dr. Jansen opined that those articles reached at least 9,665,542 people. This testimony establishes the scope of the dissemination of the false and malicious accusations raised against in Epstein's suit. That testimony is without a doubt relevant as to whether and to what degree suffered damages such as harm to reputation, humiliation, and mental anguish. + +Dr. Jansen is not attempting to be an expert on monetizing Plaintiff's intangible losses, nor on the causation of Plaintiff's intangible damages. And he does not need to be an expert on those subjects to assist the jury or to present admissible testimony. It is well-settled that the de ermination of the amount of intangible damages in personal injury tort actions is "pecul \*thin the province of the jury." Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181, 1184 (Fla. 19 t principle has been specifically applied in Florida to damages in malicious prosecu ee McDonald v. Sport, 296 So.2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Maiborne v. Kuntz, <) 5 .2 (Fla. 1952); Schlesser v. Levinson, 406 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Thus, ,C i ,)p s authorized to testify as to a methodology for monetizing a Plaintiff's intangible#t 849 + +Epstein claims that Dr. Jansen's test' s 'So it e uld be excluded because he could not specifically testify that all the "hits" e sites which disseminated the critically false information actually demonstrate viewed that subject matter. This fact does not make the testimony any less relevant hel to a jury. As discussed above, Dr. Jansen used extremely conservative methods est g the numbers of articles, published, websites hosting, and daily unique visitor tra The t timony is relevant to establish the size of readership of the media sites in question, ertainly be helpful for the jury to understand the scope and the spread of the sites ing whether was in fact damaged by dissemination of the relevant articles on the sites. For instance, according to Dr. Jansen, the Palm Beach Daily News has average daily unique traffic of 8,320 visitors and the Miami Herald has average daily traffic of 183,000 visitors. If the jury were to hear that the articles were disseminated only on the Palm Beach Daily News website, on one occasion, it would certainly evaluate claim different by than if the articles were also disseminated in the Palm Beach Post, New York Daily News (1,785,333 unique daily visitors), and Forbes (3,942,600 daily unique visitors). + +Additionally, Epstein's argument runs directly into a fundamental principle of jurisprudence that a defendant cannot benefit from his own wrongdoing. In Bigelow v. RICO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251, 265 (1946): + +The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require wrongdoer shall bear the risk of the uncertainty which his own wrong That principle is an ancient one, and is not restricted to proof of suits. [Citations omitted]. ea tttrust + +In this case, Epstein maliciously filed a false lawsuit again ds accusing him of criminal conduct, racketeering, and participation in a massiv scheme which Epstein knew was receiving nationwide publicity. As is apparent ntext of his filing the lawsuit, Epstein intended that it would harm , not fiCt4' ,hi reputation but also in the performance of his profession, more particularly his abil ' e civil actions against Epstein on behalf of clients, L.K., E.W., and J tein obviously knew, and intended, that IM' reputation would suffer from th He should not be heard now to highly qualified wi c ess lit u nd that such harm is difficult to remedy and to quantify. that evidence, in this case expert testimony from a g established methodologies is incompetent to provide the jury it guidance in d s3 in the appropriate damages. + +Supreme Court has stated (McCall v. Sherbill, 68 So.2d 362, 364 (Fla. 1953)): + +Tht5e are many types of cases in which the damages may be certain, but the amount of damage may be uncertain. However, such uncertainty will not necessarily preclude recovery. + +More specifically, the Court has recognized that some degree of speculation is inherent in any jury award for intangible damages (Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. McKelvey, 270 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 1972)): + +Quite obviously some speculation enters into most personal injury actions, but the yardstick does not exist which can measure future humiliation, pain and suffering of the injured with sufficient certainty to divest a jury of exercising its sound discretion to determine the damage award based upon the evidence and merits of each case under consideration. + +Dr. Jansen's testimony provides a valuable aid to the jury in assessing the scope of dissemination of Epstein's false charges. Thus, while some degree of speculation is inherent in any jury award of intangible damages, that is not a basis to exclude his testimony. + +Epstein acknowledges that the trial court has "wide discretion" c:\$ j++~e fining which matters are proper subjects of expert opinion testimony, citing =C . .? n, 739 So.2d 710, 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (Motion, p.15). Epstein does not dispu i 46t . anscn has a recognized expertise that he applied in analyzing the dissemination t e of Epstein's malicious lawsuit. As such, Epstein does not provide a basis its, o trate that this Court is compelled, prior to trial, to exclude Dr. Jansen's testimon as so cited no comparable case in which the exclusion of such testimony occurred. in's licisms of the limited nature of Dr. Jansen's testimony can be raised during cro tion of the expert because they go the weight of the testimony, not admissibility. S a Dept of Transp. v. Armadillo Partners. Inc., 849 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2003) + +The defin' of rel vent evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact. §§90.401, Ia. Stat. Here, Dr. Jansen's testimony tends to prove that the false gravamen of Ep t against was widely disseminated throughout the internet to multiple websites which were viewed by millions of people during the relevant time period. As noted previously, the extent of the publicity of the scurrilous lawsuit is a relevant consideration in determining the Plaintiffs damages. This is true not only for the intangible losses associated with + +reputational damage, but also the shame and humiliation experienced by the Plaintiff in being subjected to that adverse publicity which had no foundation in fact. + +Epstein does not cite any particular principle of admissibility that justifies exclusion of Dr. Jansen's testimony. Instead, he criticizes Dr. Jansen for issues he did not address such as causation and the monetization of Plaintiff's intangible damages. However, that is frankly irrelevant to this Court's determination. The question is whether Dr. Jansen's testimony is helpftt e jury in lawsuit against . Clearly, Dr. Jansen's testimony will be helpful t in evaluating the damage to the Plaintiff by defining the scope of the internet s ilol) • bon of Epstein's false charges. That is information that a layperson would not be 1; • 4t access and, of course, would not be permitted to investigate themselves as memb i So th e . See Fla.Std.Civ.Jurins. 2012. determining the extent of the dissemination of the critical subject mat + +In Angrand v. Key, 657 So.2d 1146 (F c . ISlig" e Florida Supreme Court authorized the admission of testimony of psychiatrist, olo t, or other qualified professionals on the issue of the pain and suffering caused b e of a survivor's decedent. In that situation, the expert obviously was not monetizing a to et it was deemed helpful and admissible to assist the jury in evaluating the intangib r s. + +In Acree v rtfor South Inc., 724 So.2d 183 (Ha. 5ih DCA 1999), the court authorized the admissio imony of an expert on human perception, regarding how an average alert driver to see two people who ran in front of his truck. In that case, the expert could not specifically testify as to causation of the accident at issue, nor testify as to the particular perceptions or conduct of the defendant. Nonetheless, that testimony was deemed helpful to the jury in evaluating the issues before it. + +## C. Epstein's Irrelevant Arguments + +This is not a defamation action. Epstein refuses to accept what has already been established in this case: has stated a valid cause of action for malicious prosecution. Epstein's repeated claims that is actually improperly pursuing a defamation claim must be rejected once again. Although some of the elements of damages of a malicious prosecution cl im may be the same as those that may arise in a defamation claim, that does not convert th into a defamation case. Loss of reputation, shame and humiliation are va the distinct effect of a malicious prosecution just as they are in a deft on. of action es caused by + +Epstein's Motion quotes from pleadings and discovery that because the word "defamation" or the phrase "defamatory per se" were utif at ous times, that this must be a defamation action. There is no logic to that conten V' 'ie. ation is a generic term as indicated from the following definition in the Merriam S Ats b t " tionary: "the act of communicating false statements about a person that injur the tatio f that person." Similarly, "defamatory per se" while certainly having particular i en defamation cases, is also generically defined as "a statement that is defamatory in f and is not capable of an innocent meaning." (Black's Law Dictionary 9th Ed. p.480). t ir, + +One of th ential lements of a malicious prosecution claim is that the allegations in the wrongfully ed suit against the plaintiff be without merit and that there was an absence of proba or alleging them. Obviously, that means that there must be false material contained within the charging document that is disproved (or abandoned) in the underlying case, resulting in a bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff. As noted above, the damages available in a malicious prosecution action include the damages to the plaintiff's reputation, and the shame and humiliation caused by the false charges. Thus, false statements are an inherent part of any malicious prosecution case and the impact of those charges and their dissemination are directly linked to the issue of damages. + +Epstein contends that a malicious prosecution action focuses on the civil proceeding and not "handpicked allegations," which is irrelevant to Dr. Jansen's testimony. Dr. Jansen's work involved tracking the dissemination of the critical subject matter of Epstein's malicious lawsuit, i.e. that was involved in the criminal conduct masterminded and i ented by Rothstein. That cannot be characterized as a "handpicked allegation," but rs4sh jhe gravamen of Epstein's scurrilous lawsuit which damaged irrelevant argument. Therefore, jifc ould ignore that + +Epstein's motion makes many arguments that hayc t) cation to the admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. These include taking issue S \h v a egation in Epstein's complaint that S knew or should have known that il actions he filed against Epstein were "weak." Dr. Jansen did not do any searc the met regarding the subject matter of the three civil cases brought against Epstein molestation and whether they were weak. Thus, this subject has no place in this moti w fi challenges Dr. Jansen's testimony, and therefore it should be ignored. + +Epstein a alsely laims that has admitted to having "no reputational damage" (Motion, p.7 g primarily on statements that has worked hard subsequent to the filing orb Y 's malicious lawsuit in 2009 to "resurrect" his reputation among those in the local community who know him. That is not the equivalent of an admission of no reputational damages, nor is the fact that is not seeking economic damages for lost income. As noted previously, extensive case law in Florida holds that a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action is entitled to recover intangible damages for the loss of reputation, as well as the shame and humiliation suffered + +as a result of the maliciously prosecuted litigation. Moreover, that issue is entirely independent of the admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. + +Finally, Epstein resurrects his contention that the litigation privilege applies. However, the Fourth District ruled against him as a matter of law and he conceded in the Florida Supreme Court that its decision in Debrincat v. Fischer, 217 So.3d 68 (Fla. 2017), resolved that issue. fis a result, that determination is law of the case. Moreover, that issue has no logical rel admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. to the + +O 'S + +# CONCLUSION + +Epstein has set forth no valid reason for excludin tic cex ? ,) testimony of Dr. Jansen. The jury should have the benefit of hearing Dr. Jansen' Jansen' Ss, o on the mass dissemination of the malicious claims Epstein raised against Edw c \ + +For the reasons discussed above tein Motion to Strike Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude His Testi int e denied. + ++6s + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on January 29, 2018. + +/kbt + +Jack Scarola, Esq. SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 eservice®searcylaw.com jsx@searcylaw.com and BURLINGTON & ROCICE Courthouse Commons/S 444 West Railroad Ave West Palm Beach, EL 3 (561) 721-0400 Attorneys for pmb@FL njs®F 11 1/4 w.com kb pe teLaw.com A ASA + +in M. Burlington + +ILIP M. BURLINGTON orida Bar No. 285862 + +By:/s/ Nichole J. Segal + +NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 + +### SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v. Rothsteita + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Kara B. Rockenbach, Esq. + +Angela M. Many, Esq. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +(561) 727-3600 + +Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com + +ICara®IinIcrocklaw.com + +Troy®IinkrocIdaw.com + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Angela®IinIcrocIdaw.com + +Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Mark Nurik, Esq. + +LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK + +1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +(954) 745-5849 + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER + +& WEISS, P.A. + +250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 659-8300 + +jgoldberger@agwpa.co + +smahoney®agwpa.c + +Attorneys for Jeffre Eps • + +Bradley J. Ed rd Esq. FARME , EISSING, + +EDW STOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. + +F,4t14. i 1irdale, FL 33301 425 s Ave., Ste. 2 + +-2820 \ i if.kile@pathtojustice.com + +( s y d®pathtopstice.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764103/EFTA02764103.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764103/EFTA02764103.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bec0b19dc61f11bbb371eea5eecbb8a950da03c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764103/EFTA02764103.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,729 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764103.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 27096, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES EXPERT \nWITNESS, DR. BERNARD JANSEN AND ,TO EXCLUDE HIS TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.6400756835938, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.6400756835938, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EVANT FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 363.2211608886719, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 363.2211608886719, + 464.60302734375 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 464.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGAL ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 367.125244140625, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 367.125244140625, + 155.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 155.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Basic Standards for Admission of Expert Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 377.7406921386719, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 377.7406921386719, + 183.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 183.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Dr. Jansen's Testimo Vile as it will Assist the Jury in Determining \nPlaintiff's Damage", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 525.9536743164062, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 525.9536743164062, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Irrelevant Arguments", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 274.1492004394531, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 274.1492004394531, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 350.5307922363281, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 350.5307922363281, + 306.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 306.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764103" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b822fa171e95365cdde5bdac491a8cdcd3c4177f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.md @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Fwit.ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800X30030 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +-vs- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COU NDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFEND TER-PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES EXPERT WITNESS. DR. BERNA N. AND TO EXCLUDE HIS TES + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. by alt through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response to Plaintiff/Counter-Def t Je y Epstein's Motion to Strike Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to ExclujdCit ony, and as ground therefore states: + +#### LEVANT FACTS + +After having fil icious action against Epstein attempts to avoid responsibility b g to exclude expert testimony regarding the massive dissemination of the spurious in his lawsuit against Dr. Bernard Jansen is a tenured full-time profe e College of Information Sciences and Technology at the Pennsylvania State University and is the Director of Information Searching and Learning Laboratory at the college (Report, p.24).1 Dr. Jansen is also the principal scientist at the Qatar Computing Research Institute (Report, p.24). In addition, he has over 20 years of experience in the United States Military dealing with computer science issues (Report, p.76). Dr. Jansen has authored over 250 academic publications focusing in the area of web analytics and related topics (Report, pp.28-39). Most recently, Dr. Jansen was the testifying expert in the highly publicized trial of the spo reporter Erin Andrews's suit against Marriott International, where he was qualified as an o analyze the dissemination of the unauthorized video of Ms. Andrews on the Intern p.77). + +Dr. Jansen is highly qualified to render an opinion in this ork that he has performed in this case is entirely within his area of expertise, as • ove and outlined more fully in his curriculum vitae. + +Dr. Jansen was retained to analyze the exte IS"e issemination on the Internet of the malicious accusations against raised • Sc 's lawsuit (Depo, pp. 6-102, 18, Report; pp.3-4). Dr. Jansen limited his work to ' de ormation from the date Epstein's lawsuit was filed until the day of his report 2017 (Report, p.5). During that time, the primary allegations contained exclusiv stein's suit, i.e. that was involved in Rothstein's criminal conduct, has bee ed in 74 online media sites in 104 separate stories or articles with a combined 9,669 dail visitors (Depo. p.16; Report, p.5). As explained in detail in his report and again in • osition, Dr. Jansen conducted his web analytic work using the most reliable and co ve approach in the industry (Depo. pp.71-81). + +1 This is a reference to Dr. Jansen's report, dated October 20, 2017, which was attached as Exhibit H to Epstein's Motion to Strike. His curriculum vitae was submitted as an exhibit to his deposition on December 1, 2017 (Depo. pp. 4-5) + +2 This is a reference to the transcript of Dr. Jansen's deposition, taken on December 1, 2017, which was attached as Exhibit E to Epstein's Motion to Strike. + +Dr. Jansen explained that it is not possible to look at the traffic to a page for a certain day or to view the readerships of a specific article (Depo., pp.48-49). Dr. Jansen therefore determined average daily traffic to a given site over the period of a week or a month (Depo., 48; Report, p.15). These figures are what are used in the industry to determine daily readership of websites (Depo., p.53; Report, p.10). + +Dr. Jansen took several measures to ensure his analysis was conservative. ample, he used the lowest number for the unique daily visitor count reported by the eSt is services so that the numbers would not be inflated. His conservative approach a examining only on-line sources and not any print or broadcast media that inc formation in question (Depo. p.74-76). Dr. Jansen also did not include articles for which he was unable to verify the visitor data to confirm the number of use 78-79; Report, p.6). So, out of the S 74 sites that contained articles with the langu ( od lion, he included the traffic of only 58% in his potential daily visitors total beta e s co not validate the traffic numbers for the other 42% (Depo. p.78). He did not inc is for multiple articles published by the same site with different publication da . p.80). He also did not include the counts of those people who may have been sear using a site such as Google and saw the allegations in the search results listing 80). + +Addi r. Jansen did not include numbers for any dissemination of Epstein's malici lions beyond that of the actual visitors to the site in question. Thus, he did not count any times the articles were emailed or linked to another story not including the language in question here (Depo., p.79-80; Report, p.6), or any face-to face dissemination (Depo., p.78; Report, p.6). + +Finally, as to the conservative aspect of Dr. Jansen's search, he did not include dissemination of Epstein's false allegations against contained in the book Filthy Rich, by James Patterson and John Connolly (Depo., p.76; Report, p.6). This book was an account of the rise and fall (so far) of Jeffrey Epstein and includes the allegations raised by Epstein that was involved in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +## LEGAL ARGUMENT + +### A. Basic Standards for Admission of Expert Testimony + +Section 90.702, Florida Statutes, dealing with the admission o O SA testimony, provides: + +If scientific, technical, or other specialized 'mowled understanding the evidence or in determining a fa expert by knowledge, skill, experience, trainin g\o ,, form of an opinion or otherwise, if: ist the trier of fact in a witness qualified as an non may testify about it in the + +- (1) The testimony is based upon su or data; +- (2) The testimony is the produ reli e principles and methods; and +- (3) The witness has appli ciples and methods reliably to the facts of the case. + +Here, Epstein argues o ff~aj Dr. Jansen's testimony is not relevant to any fact in issue and will not assist the the tin understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue. + +#### B. Dr. J stimony is Admissible as it will Assist the Jury in Determining PI mages + +A c malicious prosecution is considered a personal tort. Cate v. Oldham, 450 So.2d 224, 227 1984)(citing Bros. Real Estate & Inv. Co. v. = 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926). "The gravamen of the action is injury to character." Bros., 109 So. at 227 (citing Tidwell v. Witherspoon, 21 Fla. 359, 360-61 (1885)). As Epstein acknowledges (Motion, p.12), damages in a malicious prosecution action include damages to reputation, shame, humiliation, and mental anguish. Bros., 109 So. at 626; Ware v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 1442, 1471 (M.D. Fla. + +1997)(recognizing that "injury to ... reputation, shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings flowing from ... prosecution" are all damages resulting from malicious prosecution); see also Tackett Plastics, Inc. v. Bowsmith, Inc., 614 So.2d 30, 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993Xrecognizing that harm to reputation, humiliation, embarrassment, and mental suffering are valid damages in malicious prosecution action); Turkey Creek, Inc. v. , 567 So.2d 943, 948 (FI . 1st DCA 1990), approved, 609 So.2d 14 (Fla. 1992)(noting that harm to reputation is a vglldielement of damages for malicious prosecution); City of Coconut Creek v. 47 20, 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985Xexplaining that a malicious prosecution action is "a v remedy' to right a harm to reputation). + +Many of these elements of damages in malicio (t Ac rio 11) ion claims are the same as elements of damages in defamation claims. See G #4t ,. % o rt Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 350 (1974); Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television (C Nof v So.2d 627, 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), approved, 467 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1985); M—7f....e s He d Pub. Co. v. Ane, 423 So.2d 376, 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), approved, 458 So. 2 ' a. 1984); see also Fla. Stan. Jury Instruct. 405.10 (damages for defamation incl a inj to reputation, shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings). Thus, the some elements of damages raised here and the evidence used to prove such dama y the same as in a defamation case, does not support Epstein's' claim that s d ming an impermissible defamation claim within this malicious prosecution action. + +In a malicious prosecution case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stated (Browning v. Ray, 440 P.2d 721, 724 (Okla. 1968)): + +[G]encral damages for injury to reputation and emotional or mental distress, the precise amount of which by their very nature is almost impossible of proof and which damages almost certainly result if one has been maliciously prosecuted, may be awarded if plaintiff has established the other essential elements of an action for malicious prosecution. We recognize that the amount of such damages for injury to reputation and for distress will be determined, at least in major part, by the gravity of the offense charged and the publicity given the prosecution of plaintiff. + +See also Shweitzer v. Mg 456 P.2d 882, 884 (N.M. App. 1968) (citing Browning for same principle). + +Additionally, courts have evaluated the propriety of damage awards ' malicious prosecution cases based, in part, on the amount of publicity attendant to the ch ges. See Colegrove v. City of Corning, 388 N.Y. S.2d 964 (N.Y.A.D. 1976) ( for malicious prosecution and false arrest were not excessive based on, inter e "attendant adverse publicity" and its effect on the plaintiff, his wife and his chit: 695 S.W. 2d 189 (Tenn. App. 1985) (damages awarded in =dial lion case not excessive because, inter alia, "the widespread publicity" of the char (ts i . 0 Brian, 79 A.2d 769 (Conn. 1951) (damages awarded in malicious prosecut not excessive based on the "widespread publicity" attendant of litigation). In ure to document the publicity associated with the wrongful litigation can be reli or to limit a plaintiff's damages. See v. Soileau, 448 So.2d 1268 (La. 1984). + +Epstein ro hast et a single case holding that the extent of the publicity associated with wrongful l" i) tio ' not a proper element of damages in a malicious prosecution case. + +t to Dr. Jansen, it is clear he is an expert on the dissemination of information on the intclpet and he has used his expertise to track the dissemination of the injurious content of Epstein's wrongfully filed lawsuit. As his testimony clearly demonstrated, he focused on the subject matter of the false allegations that was involved in the criminal activity of Rothstein and the underlying Ponzi scheme. Tracking the dissemination of that information, which + +emanated from the wrongful lawsuit filed by Epstein, requires an expert given the technical complexities of tracking data on the intemet. + +The information provided by Dr. Jansen is certainly outside the purview of the typical juror. Evidence requiring technical computer knowledge beyond the expertise of a typical lay juror as to an issue in the case is generally admissible. See Marten Transp., Ltd. v. Platffbrm A rt., Inc.. 184 F. Supp. 3d 1006, 1010 (D. Kan. 2016) (holding that testimony of computer pant with experience in computer forensics and data recovery offered expertise bey f the typical lay juror concerning search techniques, including the use of intemet itv ould be helpful to a jury); Khoday v. Symantec Corp., 93 F. Supp. 3d 1067, 1073 15), as amended (Apr. 15, 2015)(holding that testimony of web archive mana ible because his specialized knowledge of the website archiving and retrieval •uld offer assistance to the jury in understanding the issues in the case). + +Epstein argues that Dr. Jansen's a ( Sontiill not help the trier of fact because he did not testify whether the malicious sui it inst by Epstein caused shame, humiliation, mental anguish, alp nu¢ eelings (Motion, p.14). This argument is misplaced. All relevant evidence is adm §90.402. Evidence is relevant if it tends to prove or disprove a material fact. §9 , Dr. Jansen's testimony is relevant to the issue of damages suffered as a result of 's malicious prosecution of because the extent of the dissemination of the fdt; \HI I ems made by Epstein bears directly on how much "shame, humiliation, and mental anguish" has suffered. + +Dr. Jansen testified at his deposition that the allegations raised in Epstein's suit against (that he was a participant in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme) were disseminated on 74 media sites in 104 different articles. Based upon conservative figures, Dr. Jansen opined that those articles reached at least 9,665,542 people. This testimony establishes the scope of the dissemination of the false and malicious accusations raised against in Epstein's suit. That testimony is without a doubt relevant as to whether and to what degree suffered damages such as harm to reputation, humiliation, and mental anguish. + +Dr. Jansen is not attempting to be an expert on monetizing Plaintiff's intangible losses, nor on the causation of Plaintiff's intangible damages. And he does not need to be an on those etermination of the amount of intangible damages in personal injury tort actin t liarly within the province of the jury." Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181, 11 been specifically applied in Florida to damages in malici c ) tton cases. See McDonald v. Sport, 296 So.2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Maiborn :St c 6 So.2d 720 (Fla. 1952); Schlesser v. Levinson, 406 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 4ih DCA 19 , no expert is authorized to testify as to a methodology for monetizing a plaintiff' ' gi damages. subjects to assist the jury or to present admissible testimony. It is well-settle( 7). That principle has + +Epstein claims that Dr. J timony should be excluded because he could not specifically testify that all th on the websites which disseminated the critically false information actually dem people who viewed that subject matter. This fact does not make the testimony an t or helpful to a jury. As discussed above, Dr. Jansen used extremely conservative establishing the numbers of articles, published, websites hosting, and daily uniqu ffic. The testimony is relevant to establish the size of readership of the media sites in question. It will certainly be helpful for the jury to understand the scope and the spread of the sites in determining whether was in fact damaged by dissemination of the relevant articles on the sites. For instance, according to Dr. Jansen, the Palm Beach Daily News has average daily unique traffic of 8,320 visitors and the Miami Herald has average daily traffic of 183,000 visitors. + +If the jury were to hear that the articles were disseminated only on the Palm Beach Daily News website, on one occasion, it would certainly evaluate claim differently than if the articles were also disseminated in the Palm Beach Post, New York Daily News (1,785,333 unique daily visitors), and Forbes (3,942,600 daily unique visitors). + +Additionally, Epstein's argument runs directly into a fundamental principle of jurisprudence that a defendant cannot benefit from his own wrongdoing. In Bigelo 0 Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251, 265 (1946): + +The most elementary conceptions of justice and public po e that the wrongdoer shall bear the risk of the uncertainty which his o wro g has created. That principle is an ancient one, and is not restricted to age in antitrust suits. [Citations omitted]. + +In this case, Epstein maliciously filed a false vJ t plgainst accusing him of criminal conduct, racketeering, and participation • fiCi ss e Ponzi scheme which Epstein knew was receiving nationwide publicity. As is n om the context of his filing the lawsuit, Epstein intended that it would harm E only in his reputation but also in the performance of his profession, more particul h eA ay to pursue civil actions against Epstein on behalf of clients, L.M., E.W., Jane Doe. Epstein obviously knew, and intended, that reputatio oul su er from this lawsuit, and that such harm is difficult to remedy and to quantify. ou not be heard now to argue that evidence, in this case expert testimon ighly qualified witness utilizing established methodologies is incompetent to provide th ury guidance in determining the appropriate damages. + +The Florida Supreme Court has stated (McCall v. Sherbill, 68 So.2d 362, 364 (Fla. 1953)): + +There are many types of cases in which the damages may be certain, but the amount of damage may be uncertain. However, such uncertainty will not necessarily preclude recovery. + +More specifically, the Court has recognized that some degree of speculation is inherent in any jury award for intangible damages (Seaboard Coast Line IL Co. v. McKelvey, 270 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 1972)): + +Quite obviously some speculation enters into most personal injury actions, but the yardstick does not exist which can measure future humiliation, pain and suffering of the injured with sufficient certainty to divest a jury of exercising its sound discretion to determine the damage award based upon the evidence and me of each case under consideration. + +r Dr. Jansen's testimony provides a valuable aid to the jury in assessing the ig! issemination of Epstein's false charges. Thus, while some degree of speculation i iu n any jury award of intangible damages, that is not a basis to exclude his testimo Ac ) + +Epstein acknowledges that the trial court has ' matters are proper subjects of expert opinion testim/S t 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (Motion, p.15). Epste ( s lbsin , expertise that he applied in analyzing t (se ation of the gravamen of Epstein's malicious lawsuit. As such, Epstein does no basis to demonstrate that this Court is compelled, prior to trial, to exclude Dr. Jan imony. He has also cited no comparable case in which the tion" in determining which ryant v. Buerman, 739 So.2d 710, dispute that Dr. Jansen has a recognized exclusion of such testim urred. Epstein's criticisms of the limited nature of Dr. Jansen's testimony can be ed ng cross-examination of the expert because they go the weight of the testimony, n sst ility. See Florida Dept of Transp. v. Armadillo Partners, Inc., 849 So.2d 279 + +The definition of relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact. §§90.401, 90.402, Fla. Stat. Here, Dr. Jansen's testimony tends to prove that the false gravamen of Epstein's suit against was widely disseminated throughout the intemet to multiple websites which were viewed by millions of people during the relevant time period. As noted + +previously, the extent of the publicity of the scurrilous lawsuit is a relevant consideration in determining the plaintiff's damages. This is true not only for the intangible losses associated with reputational damage, but also the shame and humiliation experienced by the plaintiff in being subjected to that adverse publicity which had no foundation in fact. + +Epstein does not cite any particular principle of admissibility that justifies excl ion of Dr. Jansen's testimony. Instead, he criticizes Dr. Jansen for issues he did not address s causation and the monetization of Plaintiff's intangible damages. However, that is f L n levant to this Court's determination. The question is whether Dr. Jansen's testim i ful to the jury in determining the extent of the dissemination of the critical against . Clearly, Dr. Jansen's testimony will damage to the Plaintiff by defining the scope of As its, o charges. That is information that a layperson w c 1 ib of qualified to access and, of course, would m ers of the jury. See Fla.Std.Civ.Jur.lns. 2012. not be permitted to investigate themselv m er of Epstein's lawsuit o the jury in evaluating the dissemination of Epstein's false + +a. 1995), the Florida Supreme Court authorized the psychologist, or other qualified professionals on the issue by the death of a survivor's decedent. In that situation, the expert g the loss, yet it was deemed helpful and admissible to assist the jury ngible losses. In Angrand v. Key, 657 So admission of testimony of psy of the pain and suffering obviously was no in evaluatin + +v. Hartford South Inc., 724 So.2d 183 (Fla. 51° DCA 1999), the court authorized the admission of testimony of an expert on human perception, regarding how an average alert driver could fail to see two people who ran in front of his truck. In that case, the expert could not specifically testify as to causation of the accident at issue, nor testify as to the particular perceptions or conduct of the defendant. Nonetheless, that testimony was deemed helpful to the jury in evaluating the issues before it. + +# C. Epstein's Irrelevant Arguments + +This is not a defamation action. Epstein refuses to accept what has already been established in this case: has stated a valid cause of action for malicious prosecutiog. Epstein's repeated claims that once again. Although some of the elements of damages of a malicious propel the same as those that may arise in a defamation claim, that does no is actually improperly pursuing a defamation claim e rejected laim may be e cause of action into a defamation case. Loss of reputation, shame, and humili c ' are td damages caused by the distinct effect of a malicious prosecution just as they t a amation action. + +Epstein's Motion quotes from pleadings and i d and suggests that because the word "defamation" or the phrase "defamatory per ' Its , ized at various times, that this must be a defamation action. There is no logic to t n ion. Defamation is a generic term as indicated from the following definition in th ebster dictionary: "the act of communicating false statements about a person that ' reputation of that person." Similarly, "defamatory per se" while certainly having p application in defamation cases, is also generically defined as "a statement that is of itself and is not capable of an innocent meaning." (Black's Law Dictionary 4 0). + +he essential elements of a malicious prosecution claim is that the allegations in the wrongfully filed lawsuit against the plaintiff be without merit and that there was an absence of probable cause for alleging them. Obviously, that means that there must be false material contained within the charging document that is disproved (or abandoned) in the underlying case, resulting in a bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff. As noted above, the damages available in a + +malicious prosecution action include the damages to the plaintiff's reputation, and the shame and humiliation caused by the false charges. Thus, false statements are an inherent part of any malicious prosecution case and the impact of those charges and their dissemination are directly linked to the issue of damages. + +Epstein contends that a malicious prosecution action focuses on the civil proceeding and not "handpicked allegations," which is irrelevant to Dr. Jansen's testimony. D n's work involved tracking the dissemination of the critical subject matter of Epste• ious lawsuit, i.e. that was involved in the criminal conduct masterm implemented by Rothstein. That cannot be characterized as a "handpicked allega • " b Cher was the gravamen of Epstein's scurrilous lawsuit which damaged ,the Court should ignore that irrelevant argument. + +"Slis Stl\ Epstein's motion makes many argum ob, t , ve no application to the admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. These include t ' s iss with an allegation in Epstein's complaint that knew or should have 1m e three civil actions he filed against Epstein were "weak." Dr. Jansen did not do y s h of the internet regarding the subject matter of the three civil cases brought agains in for sexual molestation and whether they were weak. Thus, this subject has no pla4;idS ' this dfotion which challenges Dr. Jansen's testimony, and therefore it should + +lso falsely claims that has admitted to having "no reputational damage" (Motion, p.7), relying primarily on statements that has worked hard subsequent to the filing of Epstein's malicious lawsuit in 2009 to "resurrect" his reputation among those in the local community who know him. That is not the equivalent of an admission of no reputational damages, nor is the fact that is not seeking economic damages for lost income. As noted previously, extensive case law in Florida holds that a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action is entitled to recover intangible damages for the loss of reputation, as well as the shame and humiliation suffered as a result of the maliciously prosecuted litigation. Moreover, that issue is entirely independent of the admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. + +Finally, Epstein resurrects his contention that the litigation privilege applies. However, the Fourth District ruled against him as a matter of law and he conceded in the Florida me Court that its decision in Debrincai v. Fischer, 217 So.3d 68 (Fla. 2017), resolv As a result, that determination is law of the case. Moreover, that issue has n o lationship to the admissibility of Dr. Jansen's testimony. + +Epstein has set forth no valid reason fo s lbhes " the expert testimony of Dr. Jansen. The jury should have the benefit of hearing malicious claims Epstein raised a, a s testimony on the mass dissemination of the rds. + +For the reasons discuss Epstein's Motion to Strike Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude Hl tjmony must be denied. + +CAS + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on January 30, 2018. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +eservice@searcylaw.com +jsx@searcylaw.com +and +BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] +pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +By:/s/ Philip M. Burlington +PHILIP M. BURLINGTON +Florida Bar No. 285862 + +By:/s/ Nichole J. Segal +NICHOLE J. SEGAL +Florida Bar No. 41232 + +/kbt + +#### SERVICE LIST + +E pstein v. Rothstein, + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Kara B. Rockenbach, Esq. + +Angela M. Many, Esq. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +(561) 727-3600 + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +ICara@linkrocklaw.com + +Troy@linkrocldaw.com + +Eservice@linkrocIdaw.com + +Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER + +& WEISS, P.A. + +250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. + +West Palm Beach, FL 3 + +(561) 659-8300 + +jgoldberger@a + +smahoney®a + +Attorneys for J reyftpstein + +ards, Esq. + +FE, WEISSING, + +, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. + +ir t uderdales, AFLve;3S3te01. 2 + +4) 524-2820 + +Mark Nurik, Esq. staff.eftle@pathtojustice.com + +LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK n brad@pathtojustice.com + +1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +(954) 745-5849 + +marc@nurildaw.com + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b32b7ec667591aa6c27859210f345046f723c1c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119/EFTA02764119.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,725 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764119.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 26895, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/COU NDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFEND TER-PLAINTIFF'S \nDAMAGES EXPERT WITNESS. DR. BERNA N. AND TO EXCLUDE HIS \nTES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.844, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.098876953125, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.098876953125, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 83.844, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEVANT FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 363.2211608886719, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 363.2211608886719, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGAL ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 367.10589599609375, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 367.10589599609375, + 238.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 238.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Basic Standards for Admission of Expert Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 377.7406921386719, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 377.7406921386719, + 265.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 265.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Dr. J stimony is Admissible as it will Assist the Jury in Determining \nPI mages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 526.3515625, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 526.3515625, + 541.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 541.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Epstein's Irrelevant Arguments", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 273.7792053222656, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 273.7792053222656, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Text", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764119" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8853aa94d8c1da665b28654a97e710d4569cbb9d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.md @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTH T I ividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +# NOTICE OF FILING COURT DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER + +Pursuant to Rule 2.420(d)(2), Fla. R. Jud. Admin., the filer of a court record at the time of filing shall indicate whether any confidential information is included within the document being filed; identify the confidentiality provision that applies to the identified information; and identify the precise location of the d dential information within the document being filed. + +Title/ T ocument(s): + +Mo '0 o I. e Court Records Confidential [served 1.26.18]. The original Motion is being hand deli r o the Clerk's office in a sealed envelope. + +This Notice is being filed in accordance with Paragraph 3 of the Court's Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts entered January 5, 2018, a copy of which is attached. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all counsel on the attached Counsel List, this 31 day of January, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFICATION + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Court Document Under Seal Pursuant to Court Order +Page 3 of 4 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] Ed [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Court Document Under Seal Pursuant to Court Order + +Page 4 of 4 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore tenus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. ██████████ ("██████████") the following: + +1. a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; +2. b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; +3. c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*"The court has reviewed the heavy transcript and the concepting orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's oral rulings at the surface hearing."* + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein. from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as " iciaThtl, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b '...." 'go sed to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. G + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use M this litigation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys,' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether ".." in papers tiled with the Court or verbally, in connectton rnotion, hearing, deposition or trial, 4).\ before any such information is quoted, discloseerelted upon or used, the party must file a Motion )c, ) to have the infonnation or documentsJack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. Edwards

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +Jeffrey Epstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..462742c204e2807332c2a90e222958afde38130c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135/EFTA02764135.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764135.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 10828, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 114.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 114.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING COURT DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL \nPURSUANT TO COURT ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 456.67919921875, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 456.67919921875, + 399.42352294921875 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 399.42352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 120.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 503.06399999999996, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 503.06399999999996, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 332.90999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764135" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b9a987d1470844f1e349c4fb383e699ef403cb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.md @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +# AMEND\*,. NOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING + +Pursuant to Rule 2.420(d)(2), Fla. IL Jud. Admin., the filer of a court record at the time of j . filing shall indicate whether any confidential information is included within the document being filed; identify the confidentiality provision that applies to the identified information; and identify the precise location of the ential information within the document being filed. + +ument(s): + +Oa o Make Court Records Confidential [served 1.26.18) + +This Notice is being filed in accordance with Paragraph 3 of the Court's Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts entered January 5, 2018, a copy of which is attached. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing Page 2 of + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve O t " to all counsel on the attached Counsel List, this P day of Ji-MUA V4-1 , 20I + +JACK ROLA + +Flori a t ar No.: 169440 + +At • y E-Mail(s): jsx@searc m; and ann@searcylaw.co, + +mary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scanpla Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys fsr Bradley J. + +CiS)\* + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Confidential Information Within Court Filing + +Page 4 of 4 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +--- + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore temus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ J. ██████ ("██████") the following: + +a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + +b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + +c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*"The court has reviewed the hearing transcript and the competing orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's oral rulings at the subject hearing."* + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "C nal, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, by c to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in flu iit2gation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connectio With rivotion, hearing, deposition or trial, before any such information is quoted, disclosed n or used, the party must file a Motion to have the infonnation or documents de m to be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under se ance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclo ce or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. + +4. The Court d ferirulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amounts disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlement amounts of three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of ME three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to EIM three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclosure of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under seal ordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epste Motion. ma shall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in cti + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Pal of Dectrilbg 2013,1 ounty, Florida this Clay + +### ERVICE LIST + +DONALD W. HAFELE UDGE + +Jack Scarola Ntra..../ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 meSsearcvlaw.corn isx@searcvlaw.coin nisOFLAApocllateLaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel or De endow/Counter-Plaintiff nstndatu/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@enlIc.com staftefile@pathotojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counselaendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marcOnuriklaw.com + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ieoldbereereagwoa.com smahonev@a¢woa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Scotalinkrocklaw.com zs==\*\ Karae,linkrocklaw.com An ela€linkrocklaw. inkroc Trial Co set r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +TinaGlinkrocklaw.c EserviceOlinkrocklaw.com JeffreyEp \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecf7bf19ce13301c67a717caa72d73b80d5ef7cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143/EFTA02764143.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,415 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764143.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 8603, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.0093994140625, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.0093994140625, + 112.863037109375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 112.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMEND*,. \nNOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 524.9344482421875, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 524.9344482421875, + 397.863037109375 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 397.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 323.136, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 323.136, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.36800000000001, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 509.18399999999997, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 509.18399999999997, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 100.36800000000001, + 323.19 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 446.290283203125 + ], + [ + 345.4290466308594, + 446.290283203125 + ], + [ + 345.4290466308594, + 459.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 459.6870422363281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764143" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8374c6cf9cf346f54dfa45de15aef0bf7188f7a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.md @@ -0,0 +1,3871 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT' Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S NEWLY DISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS AND TO EXCLUDE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO E NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je ("Epstein"), files this Motion in Limine directed at the newly disclosed e efendant/Counter-Plaintiff December 7, 2017, Second and ibit List (D.E. 1109) and to exclude certain witnesses disclosed on , 2017, Seventh Amended Witness List (D.E. 1042) to testify by deposition, and states: + +### N) - PRELIMINARY STATEMENT + +### • rn 1 hi its and Rahn + +On ovember 9, 2017, filed his Amended Exhibit List identifying 142 exhibits. (D.E. 1043.) (Exhibit A.) On November 15, 2017, Epstein filed his Objections to NM exhibits. (D.E. 1058.) In addition, on November 17, 2017, Epstein filed his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine which, in part, asked the Court to sustain those objections. (D.E. 1070.) The Court heard extensive arguments on Epstein's objections at special set hearings on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, and made specific findings. (11/29/17 Tr. 160-187; 12/5/17 Tr. 64- 82; 146-235.) (Exhibit B.) On January 16, 2018, the Court memorialized those findings in an Order. (D.E. 1149.) (Exhibit C.) + +# New 79 Untimely Exhibits + +"Ilits Motion addresses new exhibits revealed by on December 7 with the filing of Second Amended Exhibit List identifying 218 exhibits • odified some of his earlier disclosed exhibits and identified 79 new items.' (D.E . hibit D.) At no time during the special set hearings did counsel ad c 0 ' the ourt that he planned to amend the Exhibit List or that the parties and Court were o man incorrect list. Epstein ) '( ok) c filed his written objections to Second A c hibit List on December 15, 2017. (D.E. 1120.) (Exhibit E.) + +Epstein incorporates the introdu ' anclt ckground sections of his November 17, 2017, Revised Omnibus Motion in Limin, 70) and, for brevity purposes, has not restated those sections here. C + +# THE COURT'S RULINGS + +At the No ber 2 , 2017, and December 5, 2017, hearings, this Court made clear that it would not al parties to stray too far afield from the malicious prosecution claim. (11/29/17 Ti. 17 e Court is not going to allow the parties to try a child molestation case. (11/29/17 Tr. 187:2-8.) The Court is also not going to allow the introduction of tangential matters into this case which would either directly or indirectly inflame the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 81:12-16.) + +&#x27; While III.produeed many of the new exhibits on November 9, 2017, he never identified them as trial exhi its on is November 9, 2017, Exhibit List and Epstein was not aware that he intended to rely on them at trial at the time of filing his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +The relationship between the value ("weak" allegation) oa three clients' claims (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc) and Epstein's claimed probable cause will be permitted in a manner that benefits the dignity of the courtroom without pejorative commentary. (12/5/17 Tr. 83:1-8.) is going to be allowed to provide testimony and speak generically about the evidence that relates to his three clients or as it relates to his preparation and evaluation of their cases. Otherwise, the Court sustained many of Epstein's objections based on relevance and becau exhibits' probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair p nder section 90.403, Florida Statutes. The Court indicated that before certain e i be referenced or allowed at trial they would need to be discussed outside the n ) ce the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 198:19-199:5.) The Court also deferred ruling on E ections concerning exhibits identified to support punitive damages cl • . 7 Tr. 163:17-164:15.) While the Court will allow to speak generical) t ims of plaintiffs he did not represent, he may not go into detail about those cas (1 Tr. 4:25-6:24.) Finally, the Court ordered to produce those exhibi isted, but that had not already been produced, by December 20, 2017. (12/5/17 .21 , 19, 226, 228.) + +### NEWLY IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS + +ly ide tified exhibits can be grouped into several categories: + +A. rVi kinia IMVAMM a/k + +Illidentified thirty-one new exhibits specifically referencing or relating to + +a/kia who was not one of MI three clients. For instance, medical records (Ex. 133), twenty-three photographs in whichappeared (Exs. 136, 137, 139, 142-157, 159, 165, 173, 174), travel related documents (Exs. 175, + +176, 177), an FBI interview form for (Ex. 181), the docket of .= lawsuit against Epstein (Ex. 178), and an application for her passport (Ex. 201). + +The Court has already determined that may discuss his three clients' claims, but other than discussing the general number of claims of other individuals he did not represent, specific information about those other claims will not be allowed. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:2 -6:24.) In addition, the Court has already sustained Epstein's relevancy objection as to a pho sting. with Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew (Ex. 121) and will o such exhibits if the context comes up and only after it is discussed outside the p the jury. Epstein requests his objections to these thirty-one newly disclosed exh' co ming also be sustained. + +#### \ B. Travel and Airplane Related Exhi Aits cot + +Although has conceded that 4is i ents never traveled with Epstein, he has listed exhibits relating to travel: airport es (mr. 185) and a brochure for a Boeing Super 727- 100 (Ex. 200). The Court has a ed Epstein's objections to passenger manifests and flight logs (Ex. 51, 52) recogn ey bear no relevance to the malicious prosecution action. (12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199 new trial related documents similarly have no place at the trial cution Counterclaim and Epstein's objections should be sustained. + +# e ecords + +has identified Sara cellular phone records (Exs. 190-192). is not a party to this lawsuit and the Court has already sustained Epstein's objection as to = Trial Exhibit No. 11 which identified phone records. (12/5/17 Tr. 149:20-150:1; 159:12-160:7.) The Court should uphold the same ruling as to these exhibits. + +agreement (Exs. 202-204) and Juan Alessi's s has identified exhibits relating to Epste t Aa Q d former housemen, Alfredo Rodriguez and Juan Alessi: Alfredo Rodriguez' sen i Ss" 1 n t script, criminal complaint and plea ent and deposition transcripts (Exs. 197- 199). He has also identified deposition F" § relating to Ghislaine Maxwell (Ex. 180) and Epstein's brother (Ex. 182). Non ' timony was given in this case or relates specifically to IMM three clients, and t refo cannot be used at trial as set forth more fully below. + +### D. Photographs + +has identified nineteen other photographs (scenic, various individuals, Epstein, properties) (Exs. 138, 140, 141, 158, 160-164, 166-172, 184, 205 and 206). While is not depicted in these photographs, Epstein assumes intends to use many of them with that witness. With the exception of Exhibit No. 205, which may claim relates to is punitive damages claim (and which the Court has earlier deferred ruling on such items), otographs have no bearing on the issues of this malicious prosecution action and Eps 0 • ' tions should be sustained. + +# E. Other Individuals + +has als rt' tied eda "typed list of victims/co-conspirators unique to the investigation of J y Eps ein" (Ex. 179). Many of the names on this list are alleged victims who were minors me they filed suit and it is unknown if they have given up their right to remain anon ermore, the Court has already ruled that, while the number of claims can be discussed, the specific nature of the claims of individuals not represented by cannot be discussed in detail. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:25-6:24.) + +#### F. Criminal Records + +has identified a number of criminal records involving Epstein: March 2008 Summary of the Case from the Assistant U.S. Attorney (Ex. 183), a Statement from an unidentified victim (Ex. 188), Santa Monica Police Report from 1997 (Ex. 194), Epstein's Guilty Plea (Ex. 207), Palm Beach County State Attorney's file (Ex. 208) and Palm Beach County Incident Reports (Exs. 59 and 69). The Court has already deferred ruling on plea related doc but it has sustained Epstein's objections to criminal type records on the basis of relev tion 90.403 prejudice and has only allowed them to be introduced if the context co es ide the presence of the jury (i.e., Exs. 13, 15, 48, 49, 50). (12/5/17 Tr. 150:4-152- 160:24, 159:12-160:7; 197:24-199:6.) Epstein respectfully requests that these e ats ted in the same way. + +t \ Based on the Court's earlier rulings, E i lv mates the Court will defer ruling on three exhibits which may claim support hi unitive damages claim as follows: video of Epstein's property inspection (Ex. 6), DV 'V search warrant walk through of Epstein's home (Ex. 187), and folder titled "planes" Ex. 1 ). + +# G. Punitive Damages + +# H. Other Reaftkir , + +identi ed a number of other exhibits including, a hand drawing of Bart Simpson (E a proposed joint letter to the Special (Ex. 135), a March 3, 2011, newsp le (Ex. 186), evidence of Epstein's donations to law enforcement (Ex. 189), a checking account ledger for November 2004 (Ex. 193), and house information (Ex. 196) which in no way relate to malicious prosecution Counterclaim. Furthermore, the Court has already sustained Epstein's objections to similar items (i.e., donations to law enforcement, Ex. 45; + +Epstein's house contacts, Ex. 66). Epstein requests that the Court sustain his objections to these new exhibits. + +### EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMELY NEW EXHIBITS + +Epstein has raised the following objections to untimely identified new exhibits: + +### LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS: + +1 — All Objections 2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed by dang o dfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless on of cumulative evidence 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 9 — Other (please identify basis of obj 10 — Completeness 11 — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Coun EpslBin Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper exhibit 14 — Trade secrets/Co + +| No. | | ??iSibft Description Epstein's Objections | +|------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 6. | Video of Epstein Pr | Inspection | +| | | 3, 4, 8 | +| 59. | Palm Be ch is | Department Incident Report dated | +| | 07/25 • (unre acted) | | +| 69. | Pa | Police Department Incident Report dated | +| 133. | i, ' | Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital re: | +| 134. | andDrawing of | Bart Simpson (signed by Matt Groening) 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the Special | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 136. | | Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Photo Virginia (Mar-A | +| 137. | Color photo of | on ferry "New York" 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Time Square | 3,4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | [REDACTED] Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 139. | [REDACTED] photo on back of ship | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 140. | Picture of room in New York | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 141. | Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 142. | Color photo of [REDACTED] at Zorro Ranch standing in front of gate sign with "Z" (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 143. | [REDACTED] photo on horse front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 144. | [REDACTED] photo standing against rocks (red coat) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 145. | [REDACTED] standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo [REDACTED]; back date). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 146. | [REDACTED] photo riding horse blue jacket far | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 147. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse hand up | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 148. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 149. | [REDACTED] photo outside next to tables | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 150. | [REDACTED] photo red coat leaning on rail | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 151. | [REDACTED] photo standing outside next to fireplace | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 152. | [REDACTED] photo standing in front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 153. | [REDACTED] photo with hand over head(black/[REDACTED]) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 154. | [REDACTED] photo standing next to piano | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 155. | [REDACTED] photo in front of fireplace(museum) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 156. | Virginia Roberts photo in front of wagon in museum | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 157. | Color photo of [REDACTED] in front of museum exhibition (Santa Fe, New Mexico) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 158. | Photograph in Spain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in front of building | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 159. | Virginia [REDACTED] (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 160. | Cover photo book 2 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo [REDACTED]) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo [REDACTED]) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo [REDACTED]) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo [REDACTED]) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | scription Epstein's Objections | +| | | erhead 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo | I 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo M) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo." | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photo | and black) 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo | and black) 3, 4, | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo | and black) 4, S | +| 173. | and black | on steps with children (with back phot 3„ | +| 174. | on street and black). | wall (far) (with ba 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 175. | Travel envelope | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 176. | Sin a ore Airlines Travel Cover with h | d • Ian notes by 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 177. | Thailand Hotel Receipts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 178. | Court Docket for Jane Doe | 02 v7Epstein 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 179. | Typed List of Victims -C | pirators unique to the 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| | investigation of Jeff e | | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell | posi i n, 04/22/16 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 181. | FBI Form 30 Interview of (Redacted) 03 | in Australia 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 182. | Mark ein osition | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 183. | it19, | 008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 Ilafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File) | +| 184 | E s ein | photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 185. | irport Codes (Demonstrative) | 3, 7, 8, 10 | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Upl | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (only photo of DVDs provided) | +| 188. | Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05 | Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | + +| No. | | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| 189. | | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; | | +| 190. | Folder titled Sara | Cell Phone Summary by Detective | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara | Cell: Sara | Cell Phone Usage 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 192. | Folder titled Sara | | AT&T February 12, 2005 3, 4, 7, 8, 0, 1 | +| 193. | Demand | Deposit Account Statement | History for | +| 194. | | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997) | C3%:), , 8 | +| 195. | | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to E | | +| | | planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney' | ice | +| 196. | | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 197. | | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi t e | Im Beach | +| 198. | | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 0 09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol | /09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing | 00 | 3, 4 | +| 201. | Passport applicatio • issu | January 12, 2001 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 202. | Sentencing T | ript, Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 6, 7 | +| 203. | Crimina • mp | nt — Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 6, 7 | +| 204. | | Ple. ,,:reement — Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 205. | P t | if Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planes | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 20 | tos | of Jeffrey Epstein employees and | former | +| 207. | | Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents | 3, 4 | +| 208. | | Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Public | | + +#### ARGUMENT + +### 1. "I he 79 New Exhibits are Untimely Pursuant to this Court's Order + +At urging, this Court declined to extend any of the original pretrial deadlines. (D.E. 1059; D.E. 1086.) Although Epstein requested the recalculation of pretrial deadlines based on the trial continuance from December 2017 to March 2018, objected "to a y effort to expand existing deadlines." Id. On November 27, 2017, this Court agreed w granted Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines, find' that wholesale additional discovery will not be permitted but indivi ards and "to the extent requests may be allowed on a matter by matter basis only if the discovery r pacted by the Court's ruling on motions currently pending to be heard ...." (D.t 3;) + +The 79 new exhibits were a result of Edw iS t f diligence, not any ruling of this Court. Exhibit Lists were due on October 6, 4 /44c, ein takes no issue with the timeliness of October 6, 2017, Revised E ' it L (D.E. 1011), November 9, 2017, Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 104 ards' November 16, 2017, Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1067), which were filed ore spent substantial time preparing a Motion in Limine to address those exhibits parties spent days arguing Epstein's objections before the Court. The timing of Ed,~t D ember 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109), after the Court finish ng argument on Epstein's objections, should not be allowed because the Exhibi ntimcly. + +### 2. The Newly Identified Exhibits Must be Excluded Pursuant to Sections 90.401 and 90.403, Florida Statutes. + +All of the newly identified exhibits on IM December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109) must be excluded because they are irrelevant by neither tending to prove or disprove any material fact in this malicious prosecution action. See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. To the + +extent could argue that any of the exhibits are relevant, any alleged "probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." § 90.403, Fla. Stat., Dailey v. Multicon Dev., Inc., 417 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). "'Unfair prejudice' has been described as `an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not ecessarily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is directed at evidence which infl jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.'" v. State, 19 So. 3d 2 009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). See also Canal C v. s ania De Vapores Realma, S.A., 564 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (holding c ro we value of testimony about marriage proposal plaintiff purportedly made offeri t on woman to marry him so that he could avoid deportation, on issue of plaintiffs c r c'Sis i k far outweighed by its prejudicial effect); DeSantis v. Acevedo, 528 So. 2d 461 . d A 1988) (fmding probative value of the defendant's cross-examination of the p s main witness about prior unrelated incidents that insinuated that both the pia' e witness had been dishonest was outweighed by prejudicial nature of questions) + +inclusio e newly identified exhibits on his Second Amended Exhibit List further demons that intends to inject and focus on prejudicial and inflammatory allegations a nce that have no bearing on the malicious prosecution Counterclaim. Epstein request' s Court remain consistent in its rulings and sustain his objections to the additional exhibits. The newly disclosed exhibits have no bearing on any material issue in this lawsuit and only serve to mislead the jury from burden of proving Epstein lacked probable cause by moving the focus to matters relating to settled claims or concluded lawsuits. + +### 3. Exhibits itch t i ii tt to Prior Con\ illiffilti and Criminal Matters Must Also Be Excluded. + +Certain exhibits on Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109) must also be excluded based on well-settled law that evidence of prior convictions, acquittals or arrests is irrelevant in a civil action and thus inadmissible. Eggers v. Hardware Co., 88 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1956); Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). As sue , Epstein's conviction, as well as any testimony or evidence of any other criminal i tion, is inadmissible. This includes, for example, documents relating to a 1997 suil onica Police Report (Ex. 194), Epstein's Guilty Plea (Ex. 207), the Palm Beach (Ex. 208), and other newly identified exhibits on M S d III ended Exhibit List that relate to Attorney's file + +"` ling on these type of documents: + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 152:14-153:13
Deferred. The Court recognizes that this exhibit is more specific and it is potentially critical to the analysis as it relates to the strength of the cases that are involved | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 168:17-175:1
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If ██████████ had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, this file may come into play. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury. | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-179:25
Deferred. Because of the uncertainty, the Court defers ruling until further information is developed in order to make a cogent and knowledgeable decision | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-180:5
Deferred. Because of the uncertainty, the Court defers ruling until further information is developed in order to make a cogent and knowledgeable decision. If the exhibit does not have anything to do with ██████ three clients, the Court is inclined to sustain the objection | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and ██████████ | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:19-196:2
Deferred. If the Affidavit was prepared against Epstein himself, then it is relevant, unless it relates to any issues of Mr. ██████████ knowledge and his diligence and the like relating to his preparation of the cases on behalf of his three clients. | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8,
Document says cannot rely on this for legal action | 12/5/17 Tr. 203:5-204:2
Deferred | + +Because none of these documents relate to three clients, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court sustain his objections to these exhibits. + +#### 4. Other Exhibits Must be Excluded as Inadmissible Ilearsay. + +In addition to being irrelevant, all of the newly identified exhibits are inadmissible hearsay. "Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." § 90.801(c), Fla. Stat. In fact, many of these documents contain double hearsay, so that even if could tablish an exception for the first layer of hearsay, the documents still contain inadmissible hei Many of these documents contain contents that are entirely based upon prior stateme y individuals and other extrinsic documents; all of which undeniably do not in Reichenberg v. 846 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). ' p em here is that, in both reports, the authors simply related the substance of what had told the authors. These witness's statements, even though contained with Sy e ess records, do not fall within the i ii exception, because they were not based upon (t e,ts" knowledge of an agent of the "business." Id. at 1234; see also Harris v. Game an eshS ter Fish Com'n, 495 So. 2d 806, 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Van Zant v. State, 37 S 02 (Ha. 1st DCA 1979). Accordingly, any hearsay documents, and any reference testi ny related thereto, must be excluded. exception. See + +# 5. Certain Exhibits Should be Excluded as Inadmissible Opinion Testimony. + +Other do Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109), identified by the number " e objections column, irrefutably contain opinion statements about Epstein who is pa,possible witness in, this case, rendering it improper opinion testimony about the credibility of a witness. Alvarado v. State, 521 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In Childers v. State, 936 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), the court was faced with a similar issue, and in denying the admission of the information/documents, avowed: + +> admission of the notice would have been similar to admitting an opinion by the State concerning Junior's character, truthfulness, and credibly. Such opinion + +testimony regarding a witness' reputation for truthfulness us clearly inadmissible. *See Antone v. State*, 382 So.2d 1205, 1213-14 (Fla. 1980) (holding improper a question of a witness which sought "to elicit the individual and personal view of the witness."); [REDACTED] v. *State*, 575 So.2d, 1321, 1322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that it was reversible error to admit testimony of police officers and teacher that sexual abuse victim was truthful. "A witness invades the jury's exclusive province when that witness gives his or her personal views of the credibility of another witness."); *Alvarado v. State*, 521 So.2d 180, 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (holding that an opinion of a witness concerning his or her belief as to the truthfulness of another witness clearly inadmissible."); [REDACTED] v. *State*, 818 So.2d 432, 451 (Fla. 2002) (holding that it was improper to allow personal opinion to establish reputation for truthfulness without laying a foundation based on knowledge of the witness' reputation in community for truthfulness); *Wyatt v. State*, 578 So.2d 811, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that section 90.405, Florida Statutes, does not permit opinion testimony regarding evidence of character); Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 405.2 at 258 ("Opinion testimony, concerning a person's character has traditionally been inadmissible on the basis that it is too unreliable; it will be tainted by the underlying prejudice and bias, of the person expressing the opinion on expressing the opinion."). + +*Id.* at 595-96. + +**6. Exhibits Should be Excluded for Other Reasons as Well.** + +Other exhibits are overbroad and vague, so that they should also be excluded as identified by an "11" in the objection column. + +**7. The Deposition Transcripts and Witnesses Presented Through Deposition Testimony Should Not be Allowed** + +On his November 9, 2017, Seventh Amended Witness List (D.E. 1042), [REDACTED] identified four nonparties whom he intends to call as witnesses through deposition testimony: + +154. Mark Epstein + +155. [REDACTED] + +156. [REDACTED] + +157. Alfredo Rodriguez + +(D.E. 1042) **Exhibit F.** [REDACTED] has not filed deposition designations for these individuals or specified the transcripts on which he intends to rely. Furthermore, none of these witnesses' + +depositions have been taken in this matter and, thus, Epstein's counsel has not had an opportunity to cross exam them on the issues presented in this case. + +Furthermore, on his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, has identified transcripts for some of these witnesses and for other individuals: + +- 106. Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cas exhibits thereto +- 180. Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 +- 182. Mark Epstein deposition +- 198. Juan Alessi deposition (Vol. I) 9/08/09 +- 199. Juan Alessi deposition (Vol. II) 09/08/09 +- 202. Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez + +# (D.E. 1109) Exhibit D. + +a. S) Not Provided Testimony in this Action can only present depositions involving Epstein pertained to the malicio and malice. It is error to allow the a of nonparty witnesses as substa the ce: \'' t is matter because no prior litigation on's essential elements of probable cause trial of the other lawsuit's discovery depositions + +We hold that the admiss substantive evidefl r conclusion continues ul admiss "the SI s of a discovery deposition of a nonparty witness as tinues to be governed by rule 1.330(4(3). We reach this ns. First, rule 1.330(a)(3) has not been amended and certain prerequisites before the deposition of a nonparty is 'al. Second, section 90.803(22) [former testimony] requires that amst whom the testimony is now offered ... had an opportunity and ve to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination." added.) An attorney taking a discovery deposition does not ap ach the examination of a witness with the same motive as one taking a deposition for the purpose of presenting testimony at trial. + +... it was error to allow the presentation of a deposition of a nonparty witness as substantive evidence .... + +v. =1 764 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (emphasis added). + +None of the individuals identified on [REDACTED] Seventh Amended Witness List (Nos. 154-157) or identified through transcripts on [REDACTED] Second Amended Exhibit List (Nos. 180, 182, 198, 199, 202) have provided deposition testimony in *this case* and it is improper to allow their depositions to be used at the trial in this matter. + +- • Mark Epstein is Epstein's brother and resides in New York. His deposition has not been taken in this case. [REDACTED] has identified on his Exhibit List the September 21, 2009, transcript of Mark Epstein's deposition taken in the matter of *Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein*, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No. 08-80893 (Ex. 182). Edwards represented "Jane Doe" in that action and conducted the deposition, however, he did not ask any specific questions about his three clients. Furthermore, Mark Epstein testified that he never visited Epstein during the alleged periods of time in [REDACTED] clients' Complaints. Also, while Epstein's counsel was present at this deposition, he did not have the opportunity to question the witness about the motives and issues in *this* malicious prosecution action. +- • [REDACTED] is an alleged former assistant of Epstein who resides in Miami Beach, Florida. Her deposition was not taken in this matter and [REDACTED] has not identified or produced a transcript on which he intends to rely. +- • [REDACTED] is alleged to be Epstein's former housekeeper and resides in Palm Beach County. Her deposition has not been taken in this matter and [REDACTED] has not identified or produced a transcript on which he intends to rely. +- • Alfredo Rodriguez is alleged to be Epstein's former houseman who was incarcerated, but is now deceased. His deposition was not taken in this matter and Edwards has not identified or produced a deposition transcript on which he intends to rely. +- • Ghislaine Maxwell is alleged to be Epstein's former girlfriend and assistant. Her deposition has not been taken in this matter. [REDACTED] has identified on his Exhibit List the transcript of Ms. Maxwell's **confidential** deposition taken in the matter of [REDACTED] v. *Ghislaine Maxwell*, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, Case No. 15-cv-07433 (Ex. 180). Epstein was not even a party to that action and, thus, his counsel did not attend or question the witness. It is further unclear if [REDACTED] has obtained the permission from the parties in that matter to disclose confidential testimony in this action. + +- Juan Alessi is alleged to be Epstein's former houseman who re i e in West Palm Beach. His deposition has not been taken in this case. has identified on his Exhibit List the transcript of Mr. Alessi's September 8, 2009, deposition taken in the matter of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80119 (Exs. 198, 199). was not counsel of record in that matter, and the transcript produced does not reflect that he was even at the deposition or that the questions relate to his clients. + +This deposition testimony is obviously intended to do little more than unfairjylpflame and t prejudice the jury with irrelevant information from Epstein's criminal case aa 'or evil cases which have settled or are concluded. + +Moreover, the above-mentioned witnesses do not have perso ICIkn wledge of this matter as required by section 90.604, Florida Statutes, which states i ent part, that "a witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced viJI Lc cient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the ma Ar. IO 004, Fla. Stat. (2017). Likewise, the collateral matter rule states that litigation I collateral matters for the sole purpose of impeaching a party or witness is im psey v. Shell Oil Co., 589 So. 2d 373, 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). A matter is co Ilateral if it is not material and would not be admitted for any purpose other than the c iction. Id. Thus, unless these witnesses have knowledge and can speak to w Eps in elieved when he filed suit against la, their testimony would be irrelevant al and their deposition testimony should not be allowed. + +Fl of Civil Procedure 1.330 provides: + +Use of Depositions. At the trial or upon the hearing of a motion or an interlocutory proceeding, any part or all of a deposition may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or who had reasonable notice of it so far as admissible under the rules of evidence applied as though the witness were then present and testifying in accordance with any of the following provisions: + +\*\*\* + +(3) The deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, may be used by any party for any purpose if the court finds: (A) that the witness is dead; (B) that the witness is at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place of trial or hearing, or is out of the state, unless it appears that the absence of the witness was procured by the party offering the deposition; (C) that the witness is unable to attend or testify because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment; (D) that the party offering the deposition has been unable to procure the attendance of the witness by subpoena; (E) upon application and notice, that such exceptional circumstances exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses ora rn open court, to allow the deposition to be used; or (F) the witness is an or skilled witness. + +\*\*\* + +O (b) Objections to Admissibility. Subject to the provis rule 1.300(b) and subdivision (d)(3) of this rule, objection may be trial or hearing to receiving in evidence any deposition or part o y reason that would require the exclusion of the evidence if the ere then present and testifying. + +While deposition testimony from a diffe whom it is offered was provided with an o 1 • ve the opportunity to de malicious prosecut' rclaim), it would be error to allow the deposition relating to issues not nt in this litigation. \ e ing may be admissible if the party to to examine the deponent, because Epstein timony based on the issues in this litigation + +Accordingly Epstein, Adri Alfredo Rodriguez, Ghislaine Maxwell, si, and any other witness whose testimony was taken in other cases because such testi ny is irrelevant, misleading, confusing, and prejudicial, and the witnesses lack any knowledge regarding the issue at hand in this matter. elm to exclude use of deposition testimony from Mark + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated above, and in reliance upon the applicable law cited herein, Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order in Limine precluding his counsel, and his witnesses from making any argument, statement, evidence or comment, as well as precluding from use at trial, the exhibits listed above and deposition testimony from other matters. + +A' + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the ACIZ , listed on the Service List below on February 1, 2018, through the Court's e-fil' uant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +LINK & RO 1555 Pal West P (56 H, PA es Boulevard, Suite 301 Florida 33401 (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Link + +Cott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(glinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually. + +J individually, and L.M., individually, + +< 94S) + +Defendants, + +COMES NOW the Counter-Amended Exhibit List as follows: RADLEY J. M=. and hereby files his + +- O. No objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All object' a e t authenticity +- 3. IrreleGiDtt aterial +- 4. Probatlye value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +O SA + +# T LIST + +### OBJECTIONS + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff's, Exhibit List J. Amended + +| | Counter-Plaintiff | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit | +| | Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1 | All applicable criminal statutes. | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes. Ai | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles. AS Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owne | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. | +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint. \ C c\ | +| 7. | Messages taken from message s fo at Epstein's home. | +| 8. | Documents related to Je y p in produced by Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein's High | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein'tEllff e records. | +| 11. | Sarah 1 's phone records. | +| 12. | it it: ;on Logs. | +| 13. | e y Epstein's probation file. | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed. | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, I.Maud L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints. | | | | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | | | | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). | | | | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe. | | | | +| 24. | 2002 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book. | | | | +| 25. | 2001 [REDACTED] Palm Beach High School Year Book. | | | | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book. | | | | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation. | | | | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction. | | | | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009Q21201.1MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------|-------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | | Marked | Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | | | | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, .1. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009cagnOgaaMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home.. | | | | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes. | | | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED]. | | | | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement. | | | | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victim. | | | | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim. | | | | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06. | | | | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs. | | | | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 Ac.QMOrBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| No. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62 63. | Rothstein, J. and L.M. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Case No. 502009CAUUSSZXXXMBAG J. Amended Exhibit List Counter-Plaintiff's, Counter-Plaintiff Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto AN regarding house island project. Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. CO AS Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. MC emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Sua Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant. DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-3 t a\ v Transcript of plea and colloquy n M-08. Massage Table. No Contact Orders ent ai Jeffrey Epstein. Criminal Score Sheet ing Jeffrey Epstein. Documents evi Jeffrey Epstein's Community Cont I and Probation. Jeff s 's Sex Offender Registrations (from various | +|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 64. | .4 y Epstein's Booking photograph. | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480. | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts. | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 5020091610 13O (1MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| Case No. | | +|----------|------------------------------------------------------| +| | vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. | +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection Evidence Identification | +| | 502009CA IS 0401 XXX MBA° | +| | J. Amended Exhibit List | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler. | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| 72 | "S 5) Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assis \' | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin * | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberg 6-22-06. | +| 76. | All subpoenas i pt o State Grand Jury. | +| 77. | Docum t lated to the rental of a vehicle for | +| 79. | related to property searches of Jeffrey | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of | +| 81. | Police report regarding picking up | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800X X AG Counter-Plaintiff's, IM IM Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | | | | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. | | | | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410. | | | | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06. | | | | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | | | | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | | | | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | | | | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. | | | | +| 89. | Flight information for [REDACTED] Burns. | | | | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | | | | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, maria. | | | | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case. | | | | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech. | | | | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06. | | | | +| 95. | Alexandra [REDACTED] Police Report dated 11-28-04. | | | | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts. | | | | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter dated 7-9-08. | | | | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, M.1. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, at Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Marked for Identification | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home. | | | | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists. | | | | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | | | | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey. | | | | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto. | | | | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause. | | | | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits. | | | | +| 109. | [REDACTED] reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits. | | | | +| 110. | [REDACTED] reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Counter- 502009c40209S14MBAG Con Plaintiff's, Amended Exhibit List + +| vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and L.M. | +|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| | Marked Marked for | +| | Objection i Evidence Identification | +| | J. , Amended Exhibit List | +| By listing an Exhibit, | is not waiving his | +| their right to amend same. | AS" | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to objectionCO | +| 114 | Motions for Summary Jud at achments | +| 115. | All time records and hourly bi • d entation | +| 116. All deposition testimo | d' overy responses by | +| Epstein submitted in | is ac i n. | +| 117 All pleadings | Epstein in the | +| Rothstein | c proceeding. | +| 118 All su i i ' | s by Epstein in connection with the | +| Ro d | sition. | +| 119. | ett ement Agreements between Epstein and | +| 120 | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to | +| 121 Photo depicting | Ghislaine Maxwell and | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009iiiitiO MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's. .1 Amended Exhibit List + +| Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------| +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | | | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection | in Evidence | Identification | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | | | | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case. | | | | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | | | | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017. | | | | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009. | | | | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013. | | | | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013. | | | | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M, Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012. | | | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | | | | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile. | | | | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein,M and L.M.. Case No.: 502009Q2118 MBAG Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Exhibit List + +| | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, | J. and L.M. | +|-------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| Case No. | 502009CA 40 0 X iWIDAQ. 4. . t | | +| | Counter-Plaintiff's, J. | Amended Exhibit List | +| Counter-Plaintiff | | Marked Marked for | +| No. | Description of Exhibit | Objection ' Evidence Identification | +| 133. | | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or | +| 135. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | | +| 136. | | Any and all depositions taken in this action.c | +| 137 | Any documents or other exhibit attac | during | +| 138. | Any and all exhibits, documen | tc. rred to in any | +| 139. | | Any and all documents-and exhibits designated by all parties | +| 140. | | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | +| 141. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | +| 142. | Any | Ncords produced or that will be produced by all | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mep@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFY + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009Calif0g2MOMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Amended Exhibit List + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Semis, Esquire \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com; Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. ScottalinIcrocklaw.com Rara l inkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester = Esq wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawass 250 S Australian Avenu uite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33 Phone: (561)-65:601c m Fax: (561)-835- Attorneys fo + +Go + +Jack A er, Esquire jgoldbe gwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury oldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiffs, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED], Amended Exhibit List + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS + +DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017 + +TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m. + +PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C + +t Palm Beach, Florida + +BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept) + +Sonja D. + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +the flaw in the argument is what I perceive 2 to be a lack of recognition of, not only 3 Mr. Epstein's rationale for filing his suit, 4 but the focus, or lack thereof, on Mr. ' responsibility and burden -- 6 strict one and a strong one according to 7 onerous -- used by one of the cases in being able to prove probable cause here. + +9 And Mr. Scarola has used in his briefing this building-block approach. And '1 I think the save type of analogy or picture :2 can be utilized here when speaking about the ') motive. What was the probable cause in :4 actuality from the counter-plaintiff '5 standpoint for Epstein doing what :6 he did? + +As I indicated before, but didn't use the analogy, what you and Mr. Link provided '9 CO the Court provides, not only building 20 blocks for potentially Xr. Epstein's probable cause, but likewise provides :2 building blocks for Mr. Proving that he did not have probable cause. + +is And as far as the Court is concerned, 25 if the guilty plea came after he filed suit, + +:6 looking at it from a building analysis, as I have in the lest terms, in looking at it from des, which I as incumbent to do. as Sterol\* alluded to, this is but one item that could be argued to have fueled Mr. Epstein to have filed this lawsuit, thus making it relevant. + +:8 :9 20 2: 23 'I 25 wow. the fluidity issue that I spoke about is, I'm willing to look at it, again, if there's a case on point that specifically says otherwise. But for purposes of this particular matter, the Court would find absent the production of a case that would say otherwise, that Mr. Epstein's guilty pleas -- I understand it's combined, so I'm + +then there might be sore reasonab usent to separate it out and say, Judge, t even filed suit -- the suit -- strike that. + +He hadn't pled qu guilty plea came three years after this suit for malicious p ution, then it would probably be a re n argument that mayor may not It the da + +not suggesting there were more than one combined plea -- would be relevant, that it would be relevant to the issue of probable cause, and it would be relevant, potentially, to the time of malice. + +And that, again -- with the Court looking at it from both sides and analyzing it from both sides, it could be used by Hr. Epstein. It could be used by it Mr. But it provides at least some ll relevancy, defined again as proving or 17 tending to prove or diapro a material fact. The material fa he element of probable cause and I) is + +So again, I am fl ng to rule that they would be ado: IS 14 + +11 28 It 20 24 22 Next Bo again, we are going to completely and anti- y away from any type of Lye comments. : understand that things are said in the heat of .on that would never be repeated at Again, I'm certainly ordering that hat not take place. + +10 MS. POCastinACH: thank you, Your Honor. We had identified and have highlighted, starting with riveter three, photographs and information of Mr. Epstein's home,, plane. automobiles. I'm not sure what relevance that would have as to why he filed a malicious prosecution action. + +21 at elm COURT: Let's take thew one at time. + +Al: right. We want to go back to some + +of these -- in the time that we have left, let's go back to some of these exhibits and see if we can work through thee. + +23 Mr. Scarola, what's your position? 24 MR. SCAPULA: His homes and his 25 automobiles are evidence with respect to his is pecuniary circumstances, obviously a 27 relevant ratter when we are talking about : is punitive damage claim. + +29 THE COURT: Typically, though, net 20 worth is what is considered, not 21 necessarily -- unless it's impeachment, 22 i.e., you'll have a picture of a home that 23 he owns in the US Virgin Islands -- I think 24 that he has some connection with one of 25 those islands. And I's not trying to + +2 ) I suggest anything as far as anything inappropriate. But I can conceive of chi" situation that if Mr. Epstein testifies that his net worth is X, comprised of A, B and C 5 in large part, but you find an asset that he it's a receipt for the purchase of a book. 6 has not taken into account that's worth It has nothing to do with malicious 7 twice as much of his claimed net worth -- prosecution. + +discussed, referenced. admitted. I think it's also a receipt from Amazon for the book, by the way. it's an order confirmation. If my memory serves correct. + +9 MR. SCAROLA: I know he has a minimum THE COURT: Mr. Scarola. + +9 net worth of -- MR. SCAROLA: In fact, it does. I '0 I don't mean to interrupt, Your Honor, 10 might explain to Your Honor that many of the '1 but Mr. Epstein refuses to provide any 31 items that are on this list that are being '2 evidence with regard to hie net worth, ao we 32 challenged, a vast majority them, were '3 are obliged to offer circumstantial evidence 21 part of an appendix to t n for '6 of his net worth, unless and until those 34 summary judgment that t de nded '5 objections based on Fifth Amendment grounds 15 against by Mr. Epstein :6 are overruled on the basis that they are 'a THE COURT: Let a you this. H6r .7 + +non-testimonial. 1/ this perti r bibs located prior to the + +s THE COVRIT i think that'. a subject 11 Suit bei filed y Mr. Epstein? • 9 for another motion. Is MR. ' Yes, air. + +..c. MS. ROCEEMACK: It is, Your Honor. 20 ROCKEHBACK: It's the receipt + +MR. SCAROLA: It is. But Your Honor 21 y whom? :2 should not be deciding this issue On the 22 COURT: By anybody. For the vl basis of the premise that we are going t0 2 tees OHS of this Cage. 24 get evidence from Mr. Epstein as to what 4 MR. SCAROLA: These are items -- 25 Mr. Epstein's net worth is. + +THE COURT: In other words, was it + +• THE COURT: Agreed. I discovered in a lawsuit that vas filed prior + +2 MN. SCAROLA: All he has Id 2 to Mr. Epstein filing this suit? 3 he's willing to stipulate t n wo in MR. SCAROLA: No, air. It was 6 excess of 5100 million. 1. es a discovered when a search warrant was 5 6 difference as to wheth it's 0 million, 200 million or a thousa ion, that is. + +executed by law enforcement shortly after the criminal allegations were made egainet 7 a billion dolls or \$2 billion. Mr. Epstein before any of the Civil lawsuits + +8 So even if e eft with a Fifth e were filed. 1 MOMS\* sserti we are back to the same a So law enrorcesent gets probable cause :2 -nt of the Fifth hmendsent assertion 12 found -- or many of the things that are '2 th Id allow the inference to be -- 23 described here are found during the courze + +o isa th as raised by the defense, and 20 to execute a search warrant on Mr. epsteinis the needs to be some evidence 11 hCalfs. And one of the things that is THE COURT: I'm going to cut you off. 24 of the execution of that search warrant and + +:5 I'm going to defer on number three. 15 formed probable cause for the criminal + +:6 Number four is the Amazon receipt for 26 charges against Mr. Epstein. -7 the 'SW 101: A Realistic Introduction, 17 Even more significantly, they formed - a Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic 28 the basis for the civil lawsuits that were - 9 servitude-Principles. Skills and loots' and 29 filed on behalf of L.M., E.H. and Jane Doc, 20 'Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for 20 that is, this is all evidence taken into + +2: Erotic Slaves and Their Owners.' 21 account in substantiating the validity of .22 MR. SCAROLA: I never read it. 22 the claims of these three particular victims + +:3 Your Honor, if I might -- 23 of Mr. Epstein. 25 Your Honor. Prejudicial. Should not be 23 in the motion for summary judgment that + +21 M. ROCKENBACK: It has no relevance, 24 And all of these things are delineated + +Mr. Rpstein does not defend against and 1 collateral to the summary judgment -- thy 4 Your Honor is well aware of going to sustain the objection at this time, 5 procedurally he would have been obliged well again, subject to context for being able to + +2 voluntarily dismisses his case on the eve of summary judgment motion was made and then 3 the hearing. not challenged. For those reasons, I'm + +6 in advance of the hearing to file his readdress it, if necessary. + +7 opposition to the motion for summary NA. SCAROLA: Number four is sustained? 8 judgment. He doesn't do that. TION COURT: Yes, sir, for the reason- + +9 why is that significant in the context stated in the record. '8 of this case? Because, as we have heard 10 NA. SCAROLA: Understood. '1 from the defense, they are going to 31 THE COURT: The NIA, I have already :6 circumstances as to indicate a bona fide 16 for objecting the + +•2 challenge whether there is a bone fide 12 indicated that the inclined would be -- '2 termination of the claim against Mr. 33 if properly predicated - be allowed. 4 in favor of Mr. . Was the abuse of 34 The Jane Doe, one of la nts -- 7 '5 process claim terminated under such 15 don't see any -- what d be the grounds + +7 termination? 17 MS. not sure what the a How do we make that decision? Well, :8 relevant is. I' not the proponent of the + +9 the only way to make that decision is to It evidence, I on't see what relevance :0 talk about the motion for summary judgment, 20 uld be of Jane Dos's complaint. 24 voluntary dismissal was taken, and the 8 tart bringing in other complaints as :5 Stettin. Of limitations permitted to expire exhibits for a jury to reed. I think that + +what supported the motion for summary 21 relevance in this malicious 22 judgment, and the fOtt that the motion for 22 ro ion action might be the allegation :1 summary judgment was not opposed. A 2 of his complaint, this action. But when we + +• without ever raffling those clai ? S t' illSr.'1 2 So as long as bone fide t i 2 TeX COURT: this is the same Jane Cos 3 remains en issue, the sotto or or a different Jane Doe? 0 judgment is clearly rem a rlal. MA. SCART.A; Same Jane Doe. 5 And this is all part o the mo I for THE COURT: Overruled. 6 summary judgment. Hest issue. + +goes far afield from -- + +I Reny of th things, in addition to NA. SCARP:A: ExCulie Me, Your Honor. 8 that, forms the s or the explanation of 7 There are two Jane Does. This is Jane Doe 2 Mr. Rdw ' con when he was a member of il 102. o RAA, nd nstrate that he wasn't abusing 20 Jane Doe 102 was a Bob Josefsberg e ess any respect :It all while he 11 client. 2 s pro tilting these claims. He was 12 And just so I Orient Your Honor with 3 g very relevant and material avenues 23 regard to this matter, under the terms of + +scovery reasonably calculated to lead 14 the non-prosecution agreement, the federal 5 to admissible evidence. 25 court appointed Bob Josefsberg as counsel on + +6 So that's my full response to this. 26 behalf of all unrepresented victims to 7 THE COURT: The objection is sustained 17 protect the interest of unrepresented a on two grounds: on relevancy and also 403 18 victims turn the terms of the 9 analysis. 19 non-prosecution agreement. + +20 I will entertain the Introduction 20 One of those multiple victims being 2: outside the presence of the jury, if it 21 represented by Mr. Josefsberg was an + +22 becomes necessary. 22 individual identified as Jane Doe 102. Sh- + +23 the other concern I have is that, at 23 has since been publicly identified as 24 best, It appears to sound like it may be 24 25 impeachment on a collateral matter, 25 And the specific allegations in this coNplaint include the transport of Jane Coe 1 has been listed as a witness for years in + +2 Number 2 on Mr. Epstein's private lets :- this matter. 6 THE COURT: She's expected to be o not -- the continuance is not -- and I + +3 various homes owned by Yr. Epstein In THE COCKY: You'll have to do a written 4 various locations inside and outside the motion. Sot I want to be consistent with 2 United States. what I said recently. and that is that it' - 7 witness? emphasise not -- designed to be a wholesale 8 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. reopening of discovery: that the Court would 9 THE COURT: Live witness? take that up on an issue-by-issue basis. '0 MR. SCAROLA: Live. 10 but, without pre-deciding anything, unto:. :4 going to sustain the objection on those 24 inability of a witnes esti something + +'1 THE COIATT: At this point I'm going to 22 it can be demonstrated to the Court that '2 find that, if, in fact, she is a witness, Ix there was unavailability, th there was 3 that it would be cumulative, and hence I am 23 late filing, that there type of '5 grounds. 35 along those lines. + +'6 MR. SCAROLA: May I just finish my id These wit sees ve n listed for • 7 '9 allege in the Complaint that she was 19 it was no rt of the order of the n, molested onboard the airplane, and that she 20 C• was prostituted out to third parties onboard 21 s talk about number seven. 22 the airplane, which provided the basis for 22 . ROCKRNBACH: Messages taken from 21 Mr. seeking airplane logs and the 2 we age pads found at Mr. Epstein's hone. 24 testimony of pilots and the testimony of 4 THE COURT: what do the \$\$\$\$\$ gOS say? 22 others identified In the flight logs as + +argument as to why this complaint was of 17 lengthy per time Again, this was not 8 significance? heCauSe She does -- she does la the purp e Of t action that was filed and i t + +MR. SCAROLA: They relate to arranging + +• being present on the plane. 1 sexual sassages with minors. I can't tell 2 THE COURT: That's fine. 2 you fros memory -- but Mr. may be I e problem with Mr. ti If able to -- whether there are specific 4 it becomes an issue in o bility references to our three clients. 2 or whatever it might then 11 take THE COURT: Not to be Overly technic, 6 another look at it. Bu basis of the or hypertechniCel here, Is Mr. I arguments that ve heard, the objection serving as co-counsel? 2 DroVl, il I've told YOUr Honor before, we don't '0 LA: understood. Thank you, + +8 is Sustained for aeons that I 2 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Your Honor. I th '-'• 20 II anticipate his telling an active role in tr. trial, but he retains as CO-Counsel of + +'2 RCCMENBACR: Your Honor, before we 12 record in this case. '3 le • sod on YOUr Honor's ruling, I would 13 THE COURT: Fair enough. an ore Cony\* motion for leave to depose because now it has become '5 on that? :6 clear that she is going to be testifying, 16 : Sure, YOUr Honor. The '7 based on Mr. scarola's statement and Your 27 message pads include the names of many of + +24 IS Mr. would you like to coma.' + +:8 Honor's ruling. 28 the underaged females that visited and sot + +'9 THE COURT: Wasn't she scheduled to 39 up appointments at Mr. Epstein's home. 20 come to court from Australia? Wasn't that 20 including L.M.. S.W. and Jane Doe. 2: the lady? 21 THE COURT: Have they been + +21 MR. SCAROLA: That's where she's 22 authenticated by Mr. Epstein? Or did he 73 living. She was scheduled to come to court. 23 take the Yifth on that? 25 They chose not to take her deposition. She 25 questions related to that. They have been + +24 She was available to be deposed previously. 24 MR. : He has taken the Yifth on + +1 authenticated in other depositions by + 2 Detective Vicari, although those were taken + 3 in other cases. But he's an available + 4 witness who could testify as to the chain of + 5 custody, where he found the message -- where + 6 he found the messages and how he gathered + 7 them during the search warrant. + +8 THE COURT: The relevancy, Mr. Scarola? + 9 MR. SCAROLA: They clearly relate to + 10 the validity of the claims on behalf of + 11 these three victims of Mr. Epstein. They + 12 corroborate that these young women were + 13 there at his home on many occasions, and + 14 along with a large number of other underaged + 15 females who were being routinely molested by + 16 Mr. Epstein. + +17 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, may I + 18 reply? This is inflammatory. These message + 19 pads may be relevant had Mr. [REDACTED] not + 20 settled the three lawsuits in which he + 21 represented those three women. But they are + 22 not relevant in the malicious prosecution + 23 case whether my client had probable cause to + 24 file this action or not. Or malice. + +25 We are definitely getting far afield in + +1 terms of the exhibits. And it looks like -- + 2 and I understand why Mr. Edwards would want + 3 to try exhibits that were relevant to his + 4 clients' action because the exhibits that + 5 should be relevant in the malicious + 6 prosecution case are the facts and + 7 circumstance, or the lack of facts and + 8 circumstances on which my client relied in + 9 filing this lawsuit -- the civil action -- + 10 the civil proceeding. + +11 Message pads regarding these + 12 appointments are absolutely 90.403 + 13 prejudicial and not -- which prejudicial + 14 effect clearly outweighs any remote + 15 probative value in this action. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: It seems to me that we + 17 are going, unfortunately, around the same + 18 mulberry bush. The validity of the claims + 19 is an issue. + +20 In addition to that, the viability of + 21 the claims against Mr. Epstein from a + 22 criminal perspective is part of why he was + 23 so concerned about this non-prosecution + 24 agreement being set aside. + +25 He knew that there was a mountain of + +1 evidence that would prove that he was a + 2 serial child molester, that there were + 3 dozens and dozens of victims of his + 4 molestations, which were occurring multiple + 5 times a day, day after day after day. + +6 And the only way he could foresee at + 7 this point in escaping the criminal exposure + 8 that was clearly going to result in + 9 convictions, because of this mountain of + 10 evidence available, was to scare off the one + 11 person who was challenging that + 12 non-prosecution agreement through the Crime + 13 Victims' Rights Act case. + +14 THE COURT: I'm going to defer on + 15 ruling on this. But it is not to be + 16 mentioned during opening statements. And it + 17 is going to be determined by the Court in + 18 the context in which I believe it would be + 19 necessary. + +20 And I'm concerned about first -- as I + 21 mentioned earlier on in another exhibit -- + 22 that this is collateral. That it would + 23 constitute impeachment on a collateral + 24 matter. + +25 Again, I don't want to get back into + +1 serial child molestation. I believe words + 2 to that effect were just utilized, so that's + 3 the reason for the ruling. + +4 I think that right now, based upon what + 5 I'm looking at, which is not the actual + 6 messages, but just the recitation of an + 7 exhibit would be that there -- that any + 8 probative value would be materially + 9 outweighed by the prejudice. + +10 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. + 11 We are working off of Mr. [REDACTED]' exhibit + 12 list. And the next one is eight, documents + 13 related to Mr. Epstein produced by Alfredo + 14 Rodriguez. + +15 THE COURT: Alfredo Rodriguez was the + 16 houseperson, if I'm understanding? + +17 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +18 THE COURT: I don't know what that + 19 means. What specifically are we talking + 20 about? + +21 MR. SCAROLA: We're talking about a + 22 book that contains a list of Jeffrey + 23 Epstein's victims, their names and telephone + 24 numbers, as well as a number of other + 25 contacts that Jeffrey Epstein has, who, + +through other evidence, were established to 2 be regular guests in his home. + +3 These provided corroboration of the 4 testimony of L.M., R.Y. and Jane Doe. They provided evidence of the extent of 6 Mr. MI:stain's molestation of children, which 2 obviously supports the magnitude of the 8 wrong in which he was engaged, which goes 9 directly to the punitive value of the claims brought by L.M., R.W. and Jane Doe, that is, a jury faced with the task of waking a :2 determination as to the appropriate amount '2 of punitive damages, is instructed that they shall take into consideration the magnitude :\$ of the wrong. and that includes the total :6 number of victims involved in the offender's wrongdoing. + +:8 THE COUR,: 3 presume that by the time '9 the case wee settled that 1 or a predecessor 20 judge in that division had found a valid claim for punitive damages in terms of those cases that we are dealing with here? 22 + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. There were multiple punitive damages claims pending. 23 24 + +THE CO ': 1 would have expeCted so. + +?CS H\ + +25 + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Yea. + +3 4 6 7 MS. ROCKENBACR: You got Lie directly to the relevant evidence for Mr. clients' Cs case. on gee bet in chit + +I just didn't know the timing. + +THE COURT: CdJfcerns are, again, that we going far afield. And '0 aced m st efforts are CO try to keep 0 1 1 playing field when it comes :2 no on the claims that are made in :3 ,titular case, that being the icious prosecution case. + +And while I know and I have already :6 indicated -- and I believe Epstein's counsel 12 has conceded -- that it cannot be sanitized, :8 and will not be sanitized, because It goes :9 to many of the issues that are involved 20 here -- and by way of Mr. 71 recitations, through Mr. Scarola, the 72 motives that Mr. Epstein may have had to 73 file the action at bar. + +But at the same tire I am going to rule 25 in the same way as I did as to number + +10 11 32 11 34 13 ti lr 3. la MR. SCAROLA: When Mr. Epstein allecathat these cases were ginned up, when he alleges that asking in the complaint for \$50 million laic/ was totally out of line and supportive of his conclu s that this was a fabricated claim c am ` ed solely for the purposes of a knowingly supporting a Pone' sch -- when he alleges that these Case I h no significant value, how 1k about whet the punitive smelt v we of the cases were and why they en s punitive damage value 20 Sr\* claims relating to a vast 21 22 2 molestations by a billionaire? COURT: DOOMS we are dealing with three cases that Mr. represented And to allow + +and that is that I find that under 401 that the probative value -- any probative value is materially outweighed by the prejudice involved. + +MR. SfAR0LA: May I ask a rhetorical question, Your donor? + +THE COURT: Sure. + +2 collateral to the allegations ride by Epstein in his claim. + +20 And there's no contention here that mAIMID for whatever reason, went on some type of organised witch hunt so as to persecute or threaten Mr. Epstein with proof of ocher cases, proof of other alleged rolestatiOna, documents that are at Issue or anything of that nature. + +31 12 23 24 25 IS 29 18 MR. 9CARO:A: That's exactly what w,,. alleged, sir. it was 0110940 that was pursuing discovery with regari to molestation, of other children that took place on an airline when none of Brad clients were ever molested on the, airplane, that he had no reasonable basis for doing that. + +19 20 21 THE COURT: Now, it seen to me we'rr engaging in a negative, proving up a negative. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: You lost me. + +23 24 THE COURT: You understand what I's trying to say? + +23 MR. SCAROLA: No. + +bale three individuals. records, information about anybody else rr + +this juncture would, in ay view, be + +THE COURT: If none or 1 clients were molested on an alipi3ne, the, the litigation team relentlessly and 4 that is, then there's no reason for the-, manifests regarding flights Epstein took 5 other issues to be introduced, because with these famous individuals knowing ful + +Paragraph 3\$ states. quote, For instance. 3 it seems to me to be conceding my point, and knowingly pursued flight data and passenor, 6 there's nobody that Mr. represented well that no underaged women were on boar, 7 that was molested on an airplane. and no illicit activities took place. + +a MR. SCAROLA: That's exactly my point, Rothstein and the litigation team also + +9 sir. That's the defense argument. inappropriately attempted to take the + +'0 THE COURT: Show ma where that's -- 10 depositions of these celebrities in a + +• 1 MA. SCAROLA: That's the defense 31 calculated effort to bolster the marketing "2 argument that this was irrelevant discovery. 32 scam that was taking place, quote. + +'T THE COURT: Show we where that's in the 33 Next paragraph? 6 complaint about the other alleged victims. 34 MR. SCAROLA: He agrap + +'5 MR. SCAROLA: We'll have that for you 15 TIM COURT: Quote e of the 6 in just a moment, Your Honor. 26 plaintiffs' co sal e that. + +7 THE COURT: Let me take a look at that IT One of a 1ff' counsel, 8 and see how It nay Or may not be Conjecture. 18 deposed t ran Of stein's pilots and sour + +i MR. SCAROLA: While we are finding It the dem)e n a fourth pilot Currently in + +7o that -- we will have that for you in just a 20 a moment -- Your Honor may Iraq. recall that I 21 1IIII0B :3 unfortunately, misplaced the COpy Of the 74 25 federal statute. I should have it -- I should have It in just a moment. + +pilots were deposed by for 22 referenced earlier -- and I have, 22 ova hours, and never asked one 2\ lion relating to or about L.M., E.M. and 4 tanesDoe,toRtRi:'s n on ol:::tsh.tsasfi:R:81::ed ts toon + +• THE COURT: I mean, I'm look 1 any of Epstein's planes. 2 paragraphs 17 and 10, for ex e, 2 But asked many inflammatory. 7 action, Epstein is cure n pilots' thoughts and beliefs, which will 5 defendant in three civ s alleging never be admissible at trial, which could 6 sexual assault end butt were handled only have been asked for the purpose of 7 by RRA and his move, including S pumping the Cases, and thus by using the 8 prior to its imp 0 -- presuming he means 7 deposition to sell the Cases or a 13443 of 9 AAA's a t Xr. ards' implosion -- One il them to third parties. End quote. o of w ch filed in federal court -- and 10 Anything else? • 0 In to Court that I have already 21 MM. SCAROLA: Three are two obvious :2 ntif 0. The civil actions were filed in 12 references in the complaint to conduct on + +3 Mr. Epstein alleges, while at t is leading and irrelevant questions about the + +3 and September of 2000. 25 the part of Brad alleged to have Paragraph 18 then says, quote, What is 24 been improper and forming part of the belie + +:5 clear is a fraudulent and improper 15 for abuse of process claims. :6 investment of a Ponxi scheme was, in fact. 26 THE COURT: The Court's ruling remain-7 conducted and operated by REA and certain of 27 the same. a the named defendants, which scheme directly 28 MR. SCAROLA: I never like to argue 71 at issue. 21 THE COURT: Sure. + +o impacted Epstein as a named defendant in 29 after the Court has already ruled, but there 70 these civil actions -- referencing the three 20 is ono additional point that t want to make. + +22 AS. ROCIANBACR: Correct. 22 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I have cited 73 THE COURT: Where is -- 23 in -- we have cited in submissions to the + +74 MR. SCAROLA: Paragraphs 35 and 36. 24 Court, specifically the motion in limine + +>5 THE COURT: Let's take a look at those. 25 addressing the scope of admissible evidenc + +that we have filed. IN have cited the 2 provisions of Florida statute 90.404, 3 subsection two, commonly known as the 4 Rule statute, which talks about evidence of other crimes. + +6 We have also cited the Federal Rules of 7 Evidence, rule 415. And that rule expressly 8 permits the introduction in evidence of the 9 molestation of other children in any federal action, criminal or civil, involving the molestation of a child. + +:2 Congress explained -- and quote, That : in the submission to the Court -- the reform :4 effected by these rules is critical to the '5 protection of the public from rapists and :6 child molesters. it's justified by the distinctive characteristics of the cases to which it applies. + +In child molestation cases, a history 2o of similar sets tends to be exceptionally probative, because it shows an unusual :2 disposition of a defendant, a sexual or vl pseudosexual interest In children that 14 simply does not exist in ordinary people. + +moreover, such cases require reliance + +on child victims, whose credibil ?Cli\c 2 readily be intact in the absen o 3 substantial corroboration. 4 In such cases, the a ling public interest in ads sing a 1 significant 6 evidence that will shed 7 credibility of the charge and a ight on the hangs -- excuse ms — of 1 by the defense. + +2 50 1- :2 :3 lit: And Mr. Scuola, if we Were SO l molestation case. there way nger argument. But the very point m making is that we're not trying a ual molestation Case, per. + +:6 :8 :9 20 71 72 73 25 Mew, there may be elements and issues that may arise, depending upon the nature of Mr. Epstein.s position relative to these matters. However, it does not change the court's view that these messages taken from a message pad at Solitaire's home relate to others and that the documents related to Epstein produced by his houseman, Mr. Rodrigues. that relate to others, remains irrelevant. And any probative value, if found to be relevant, would be + +10 21 12 we are going to have to call it a day. I thank you very much, again, for your arguments and your input, written and oral. Thank you, again. + +23 14 15 Again, thanks to Cu reporter and our courtroom personn o for it hard work and courtesies. + +14 27 18 Rave a goo week. We will see you baclikl tore, on Decesber + +19 20 MA. ank you for your time. COURT: We will take up the issues of evidence first, and then go back to the schedule, which r much appreciate you all providing. Me ill adhere to that schedule as we continue on with the motions. + +2 We will be in recess. - - - (The above proceedings were concluded at 3:55 p.m.) + +notarially outweighed by the prejudice. + +The court's decision remains the same. I think it's bolstered by the fact that we are not trying the child molestation case. And the significance of the collateral cases is not, in my respectful view, necessarily touchstone of this particular case and this particular analysis. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOLUO 7 + +# TRANSC Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +Court Is thinking from that standpoint. we were reviewing. 2 perhaps ruling at this point, with the THE COURT: I actually have it. 3 caveat that, consistent with motions In Thanks. 4 liming and the recognition by the appellate KS. R0CKENBACH: You do. Okay. 6 are often situations where situations will That's obviously a separate document. 2 change and context is introduced to cause THE COURT: That, : will take. 9 some regard. But that is afforded to me . in the motion starting on page three. '1 MR. LINK: Your Honor, before we start, it exemplars. :4 THE COURT: Sure. Not a problem. Take II single one of the a s. y are '6 minutes, please. 16 places. 's MR. SCAROLA: May I make a procedural II Omnibus otion n mine? 20 THE COURT: Yee. 20 Omnibus -- 25 THE MAT: That's what I es list. + +5 courts -- much to my delight -- that there Our objections were filed November 15. 4 the Court to, perhaps, vary its decision in KR. LINK: Your Honor, they are listed :0 once trial is underway. 20 THE COURT: I thought those were just :2 can I take you up on your three-minute break 12 KR. LINK: In the omn s motion in '3 opportunity, please? I) limine, it actually li think, every 15 a few minutes. Come on back in about five IS identified in here. they are in two '2 IA recess was had 11:16 a.m. - 11.24 a.m.) 11 THE three of the revised '9 inquiry, Your Honor? It MS. KE ACH: Your Honor, it's the M.R. SCAROLA: I assume that we are 21 COURT: Ie that part Of the -- 22 Storting on page 23 of Jeffrey Epstein's 22 . SCAROLA: If we ere working with 23 revised omnibus motion in limine. Is that 2 t witness list -- : mean with the exhibit 24 correct? I Set, we will just work with the exhibit + +• understanding. I THE COURT: Let's do that. 2 Ma. Rockenbach? 2 MX. LINK: that works for us, Your 3 SR. SCAROLA: That's w e le off. Honor. 8 MS. ROCKENHACII: Y . T x It THE COURT: shanks. 6 MR. SCAROLA: Well, cific to take these one at a tire? 7 exhibits that y re Objecting t0 are THE COURT: Yeah. 2 XS KEN Actually, we II One that we were on was number nine, '0 at left off at Mr. ' 20 Mr. Epstein's flight loge -- if 1 may :2 revised omnibus motion in liming 12 what was Provided to my office from :5 objections to the exhibit Itst. 15 particular exhibit. :6 THE COURT: when is the list of 26 We've objected on the basis of :7 exhibits? 17 relevance, of 90.403, judicial value. And :9 copy, I need one also, please. I gave mine 19 They have no relevance to what is being 20 to Sonja at the end of the last hearing. 20 tried in this case, which is malicious 2: And I was assuming we were going to be 21 prosecution. 74 approach? I have a copy for Mr. Sterols. 24 so the flight logs are completely 25 It is Mr. Edward's amended exhibit list that 25 irrelevant. + +I section, which should lette . MR. SCAROLA: So I assume we are going 8 identified in th on, Correct? 8 MS. KOCKEHBACH: Your Honor, the next Its nd we are on number nine. 21 approach, I would Ilk., t0 give Your Honor 1 I ed examples of the objections that 23 Mr. Scarola. And it is a sampling, becav20 had. And we have listed and filed our 24 I think there wore over 200 pages for thfr :a YR. SCAROLA: If you have an extra 18 these are flight logs of my client's plane". 12 basing this discussion on the motion. 22 Mr. testified that he knew that 23 MS. ROCKKHBACH: Your Honor, may I 23 his clients were not on my client's plane, + +THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Scar0la. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: yes. Your Honor, one of 3 the alleged bases for Jeffrey Epstein having 4 concluded that was a knowing participant in the Rothstein Monti aches\* is 6 that the scope of the discovery that 2 was seeking once he became a mesber of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firs 9 expanded to include matters that he was not previously focusing on and which had no reasonable basis to lead to the discovery of :2 admissible evidence. + +7 So he alleged that the abusive :4 discovery that engaged in '5 gave him reason to believe that he was only :6 doing these things because he was knowingly supporting the Monti scheme. + +'8 So obviously haS an '9 opportunity to explain what he did and why :o he did it. Yes, I was seeking discovery with regard to the airplane flight loge and :2 who was On the airplane. And the reason why :3 I did that was because, even though my 01471 24 clients were not transported on the plane, i 25 know that Other young women were transported + +4 6 on the plane for purposes of pros and sexual abuse. And I can p through the flight logs the occupants on the airpla children who were Dein Jeffrey Epstein. + +:6 :8 excuse me 415.51611 -- end I ed this in an earlier argument to Court -- expressly allows the introduction into evidence in any case involving a sexual offense against a child, the commission of any other sexual offense against a child. + +:9 20 71 72 75 So, I was seeking evidence to prove a pattern of abuse of children including their transportation for purposes of prostitution. And I was doing that through flight loge that identified these children, flight logs that identified other witnesses, taking the depositions of pilots. And so all of this + +Part of wh federal claim is interne keg this is a viable restate and tetion of children for pu prostitution. 31 14w. specifically Federal + +1 is information than rebuts the assertion by Jeffrey Epstein that this was an abusive discovery effort that supported my conclusion that was a knowing participant in the Ponsi scheme. + +10 That's what he alleges. In tact. portions of the deposition of have already been identified by thr defense as they're intending to introduce this in evidence before the jury. + +21 12 21 15 14 I/ have some of those excerpts, if you Your Manor needs to take a 1 at them. They are offing that evi th regard t these setters as part et for the lack of probable eau- to conduct this y he assertion that this w discovery protest. + +la 20 21 How, they alleged in their complaint. Specific allegations are in the complaint. Those are false s. + +22 COURT: ShOw se those allegation: 2 CT you are suggesting. + +MR. SCARO:A: Eros the complaint, Your Honor, or frog the deposition testimony? + +20 31 MR. SCAROLA: It's a little bit difficult for Your Honor to see on these copies what the defense has designated, but on page 153 it \*Carta ao line two and continues through -- it looks like the bottom of that page. And then on 276, 277, 278 and 2/9, it's most of all of those Pages. + +12 23 24 15 Then in the Complaint, the allegation in paragraph 35 -- and I will pause, if Your Honor would like se to do that, while you are reading that. + +36 27 TRH COURT: If you will, take a moment . Thanks. + +28 29 20 21 22 I don't see much as far as what is set forth in the latter pages of the deposition of Mr. that even mentions the plane or its connection with the alleged underage/ individuals on that plane. + +23 24 23 Let me look at the complaint. Paragraph? MR. SCAROLA: Thirty-three. 34, 2f, le. + +VHS COURT: Either way, or both. MR. SCAMO:A: Let se do both, then. THE COURT: Thanks. + +2 3 THE COURT: okay. This is directed to primarily to Xr. Rothstein. It says 'and others.' Rut it says, quote -- paragraph 4 36 -- Upon information and belief, Rothstein pumping -- that word is used in quotes -- S and others claimed their investigators the cases and thus by using the deposition 2 individuals onboard Epstein's private J.,' third parties, end quote. 9 03 -- and possibly others -- copies of a in an Associated Press article, that '0 flight log purportedly containing names of 10 celebrities and other famous people had + +1 loading irrelevant questions about the pilots' thoughts and beliefs, which could only have been asked for the purposes of 6 discovered that them were high-profile to sell the cases -- or a part of them -- to + +8 where sexual assaults took place and shoved 42(k). Told investigators, as reported • 1 celebrities, dignitaries and international 21 flown on Epstein's plane when assaults took '2 figures. 32 place. Therefore, even tho none of RRA's '7 Remind me who is 03? 33 clients claim they flew Sn's planes, :4 XS. ROCKEMACH: One of the investing 34 the litigation team a pilot nd flight '2 companies that was being defrauded by 15 logs. Why? Again to me the investment \*6 Rothstein. 14 pump, enquote. ith m y without any '7 THE COURT: Okay. I have read those 1/ relevance t let g claims made by MA + +8 other ones. Are there any other -- 28 the clie a, end ote. + +'1 M. SCAROLA: Paragraph 35, Your Honor, It MA. ' Our pOSitiOn, Obviously. 21 22 . allegations in the complaint, Fe ally allegations that no \*\*MUMS 24 the litigation team relentlessly and 4 hat that was untrue. Me knew that children 25 knowingly pursued flight date and passenger were being assaulted on the plane. He knew + +20 then Specifically references the litigation 20 i Honor, that having made then 22 team. M you recall, the litigation team is defined as including + +21 THE COURT: Thirty-five. For instance, 2 t place on the plane, M. Epstein knew + +• manifests 2 with famous individuals know fu 2 were present on the plane. And 3 that no underaged warren we a no had a reasonable basis to conduct 4 illicit activities took o -tein this discovery pursuant to applicable 5 and the litigation to also i a roP 44444 1 Y Florida law and applicable federal law as 6 attempted to take the one of these well as, because it was reasonably 2 Celebrities In ICulated effort to Calculated t0 lead t0 the discovery of 8 bolster the mark Cam that was taking 8 admissible evidence. + +) piece. quote. il So the flight 1MS are clearly relevant o he a 40-Semething thlit was 20 and material for that purpose, as is all of d. 21 the evidence with regard to what Mr. Epstein '2 SCAROLA: I don't know if Your 12 knew was OCcurrIng on those airplanes. And fit reference to Mr. and his la in this complaint as a basis for his belief :5 conduct of the discovery and then 62(k). 15 that was fabricating these + +'3 o ook a look at 36, but that's a 23 that directly contradicts what is included + +:6 THE COURT: 'Thirty-six. One of 24 claims. -2 Plaintiffs' counsel, deposed three 27 THE COURT: Thanks, M. Scarola. - 9 deposition of a fourth pilot. The pilots 19 the Elmo for a minute? 20 were deposed by for over 12 hours, 20 THE COURT: Sure. 21 and never asked one question 21 MS. ROCKKRBACM: I really appreciated 22 relating to or about R.M., L.M. and Jane Doe 22 Mr. Link's presentation this morning based 25 Rut asked many inflammatory and 25 of the weekend looking at malicious + +- a of Epstein's pilots, and sought the 28 MS. ROCKKHBACH: Your Honor. may I use + +23 as it related to transportation on flights 23 on the law, because after the november 29th 24 of Mth clients on any of tpstein's planes. 24 hearing, I went back and I spent a good part + +prosecution cases, because I thought I must 2 have missed something. I must have missed 3 something, because all I hear Mr. Scarola in 4 court saying is he's going to prove that the allegations In the original proceeding that 6 my client filed are false. And I never knew 7 that to be a malicious prosecution action. + +8 But my research yielded what Mr. Link 9 indicated this morning, which is, the Debrincat case is the blueprint for this trial. The Debrincat case actually has the :2 most guiding principle in it for this Court, 3 which is going to, I think superimposes the :4 entire exhibit list of Mr. Scarola's as it '5 relates to a lot of these exhibits that go :6 to one of the other lawsuits, whether it's Mr. ' lawsuits on behalf of the three is women whO sued Mr. Rpstein and was settled '9 in 2010 -• that Case is over -- or the :0 exhibits go Co one of the Other lawsuits. + +The statement in DebrInCat that's so :2 important is that MOW' Honor, Mr. Scarola '3 and T. parties and witnesses, should be :4 absolutely excepted from liability to an 75 action for defamatory words published in the + +4 6 9 course of judicial proceedings. So when Mr. Scare's pulls complaint, my client's or ng and wants to parse thro allegations or paragre I'm going to prove that that stet s false and You Should neve it, that's net what the malicious pr u on law says. That's not who are h to do. + +:6 :8 :9 20 21 .72 23 And, In fact, that's the Liabos case that Your Honor discussed with us back on November 29th, whets there's a mixed question of fact of law, Your Honor has to do that threshold determination of If there's any question or dispute of those facts that my client relied on were not in existence. If the facts existed, then you have to determine, as the Court, whether my client had sufficient probable cause. + +25 So what are the facts that my client relied on? They are not the flight logs. + +for Your Honor to decide as a d er, whether the facts that my esonably relied on existed et the commenced the original proceeding. + +10 I see why it's a focus, though, because Mr. Sterol\* wants to try other cases. This is not a sexual abuse case. It is not a federal court action, a Crime Victims' Rights action. It's not even a defamation case, which Your Honor clearly stated thy morning when denying the affirmative defenses related to defamation. + +11 32 11 14 15 ti So to allow flight logs into this malicious prosecution case i empletely irrelevant to the issue er the fact: that my client rellad an he fled the original proceedin ve n existence at the time that he f + +IT 18 39 The f the there was a civil action f feicure proceeding against Rothstein edyith the D.S. Attorney's 20 o that the ROChStein's firs wee 21 ; that Mr. held himself 22 out Partner in that firs; that 2\ Kr had the three lawsuits, which - even concedes in his most recent dep0a1t100 -- were used by Mr. Rothstein r + +He's not relying on those flight logs. That's a complete red herring for the Court. + +1S 1 + +10 11 12 The Risorbeek lawsuit, brought by Mr. Bill Scherer, down in Fort LaUderdale, who was quoted in a newspaper article, NY Client read and relied on that said Mr. Rothstein was tricking investors. He 23 used Rpstein's cases as a showpiece and 24 bolt. Mitch Rpstein caseai The one that 15 had. + +fabricate -- and that's the word that Mr. testified to under oath -- to fabricate -- and create a fantasy. That was another word Mr. used. + +?hose facts, did they exist? it sounds like we're in agreement. Those facts existed. + +14 So the flight logs are irrelevant. 17 They are far astray from what we are here to 18 try. And they are an attempt to open up 39 some other lawsuit, sexual -- + +20 By the way, the three clients of 21 Mr. S Mr. concedes, were 22 not -- you never heard Mr. Scarola deny 23 that -- because Mr. conceded, tke. 24 are not on my client's planes. + +25 So this, like many of the other + +exhibits. Your Honor, suit be precluded, 2 because they are wholly irrelevant. And if there was any remote probative value, they 4 are prejudicial to talk about flight logand celebrities who may have been on my 6 client's planes. + +2 THE COuRf: I think that the issue itself -- meaning the tangential allegations 9 that were made that mentioned flight logs or mentioned the good faith discovery aspects of Mr. plight relating to hie three :2 clients -- has some relevancy. + +11 However, the flight logs themselves would be subject to -- and the Court is :5 sustaining at this juncture the relevancy :6 objection, and also a 403 objection, and that is, that while mentioning the fact that :8 Mr. in good faith whatever the case may have been -- sought these flight :0 logs as part of his discovery process representing the three young woven, at the :2 HIM time the Court has expressly indicated :3 its significant reservations. And in fact. :4 It's condemnation of trying either those 25 cases In this courtroom -- as for as the + +1 4 malicious prosecution case is con or more Importantly, that we a potentially constructively underaged or over the a albeit potential sexue aims .• in this forum. + +:6 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor? May I raise a question. + +:8 :9 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COVET: Briefly. MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. Do I understand the Court's ruling to be that Mr. is going to be able to explain why he was seeking the discovery he was seeking, why he was seeking the flight logs, the fact that he did obtain flight logs that confirmed independent information + +So again. it may become relevant as to why Mr. E nt about his bUslineS seal out thou flight logs in a er good faith discovery, the flight rae s. In this Court's respectful d upon its ruling, are irrelevant. there's any probative value at all. y would be materially outweighed by the prejudice of 403. + +about children being transported on the airplane? THE COURT: The latter is the one th will have to be discussed further, again. as I pointed out earlier, when the context comes up and it's introduced or attempted to be introduced outside the presence of the jury. + +To the, what I perceive to be three lo questions, the two former questions, the 11 answer would be yes. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Will the rt take 13 Judicial notice of rlori to 90.404 24 (2/, which is cosmos' reed as the 15 Rule, and V Rule 41500, 14 which expressly t introduction of 1/ evidence wi other sexual 28 assaults gainst h Idren, so that the jury It is &&&&& he act that Mr. not 20 good faith basis to conduct this 22 but quite arguably would have 22 Dee Osonly negligent to have failed to N tse ue it? + +4 THE COURT: The only thing I would say CO that. Mr. Scarole, is I don't want to six + +2 10 11 32 23 apples and oranges. And that Is, I don't want to place the Court's incrisinator on getting too far afield and turning this into a case about alleged sexual exploitation, particularly of others. Outside of Mr. ' representation. That would serve only to inflame the jury, and, again, would cause the playing field to betas. Unleveled, because the defense to the malicious prosecution clefs, i.e.. EpStein and his attorneys, would have CO be righting C14111141 that Cho)),May not even know about much, such less the ones that they do. + +14 15 16 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 So again. I want to center on those three claims that were brought by Mr. on behalf of his clients, and center on those aspects that would be relevant to the malicious prosecution claim and the alleged ginning up of those claims, the alleged attempt to align himself with Rothstein, the alleged attempt to factor these cases, potentially Mr. conduct as it related to those factoring matters. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: I as -- I -orr•• ' + +1 didn't mean to interrupt. + +2 THE COURT: What I'm trying to say is +3 things like flight logs, the danger of +4 unfair prejudice. And also, in -- to answer +5 your question regarding the cases that talk +6 about the prior similar acts or perhaps even +7 subsequent similar acts, those cases are +8 from the forum of which the actual criminal +9 claim, or perhaps even a civil claim that +10 stems from the alleged assault, is being +11 heard. + +12 Again, what I'm trying to emphasize is +13 that I do not want to introduce tangential +14 matters into this case which would either +15 directly or indirectly, whether purposefully +16 or not, inflame this jury. + +17 So that is the ruling of the Court. + +18 I want to move forward now on to the +19 next issue that's being objected to, that is +20 what is generically listed as Jeffrey +21 Epstein's phone records. + +22 [REDACTED] I approach, Your +23 Honor? And I can swap with the court +24 Exhibits 10 and 9, the phone records that +25 were produced to my office by Mr. Scarola. + +1 Your Honor, the objection is identical +2 to the last in that they are not relevant. +3 My client's phone records, if there was any +4 remote relevance as to who my client may +5 have called on any given day, I don't think +6 that's going to be -- I think it's +7 prejudicial. I think there's a danger of +8 prejudicing this jury. + +9 I am not quite sure what relevance +10 Mr. Scarola thinks that phone records have +11 to the malicious prosecution action, unless +12 they think we may hear that there is going +13 to be some attempt to prove the falsity of +14 some individual allegation in the original +15 proceeding, which is not what we should be +16 doing here in this action. + +17 THE COURT: Thank you. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: I am -- I continue to be +19 extremely puzzled by that statement, that we +20 are not here to prove the falsity of claims +21 in the original complaint. + +22 I would like some guidance from the +23 Court. + +24 THE COURT: No need to be puzzled. I +25 think I've already made myself abundantly + +1 clear, and that is, that the relationship +2 between the legitimacy of the three +3 claims -- L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe -- are +4 going to be permitted in a manner that +5 befits the dignity of the courtroom, without +6 pejorative commentary as to Mr. Epstein, +7 nor, obviously, as to the three plaintiffs +8 at issue. + +9 And as conceded by Epstein in his +10 papers, once Mr. Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach +11 became involved to the matter, and that is, +12 there's no conceivable way that those issues +13 can be ignored, because of the nature of +14 Mr. Epstein's announced defense as well as +15 his deposition testimony to the extent that +16 he testified. And that is, that these three +17 cases were a part of some type of an +18 elaborate scheme by Rothstein and others, +19 including the litigation team -- which is +20 defined as including [REDACTED] -- to somehow +21 inflate, gin up, overexaggerate, whatever +22 the case may be, the value of those cases to +23 these investors, whatever damage was caused +24 to Epstein as a result thereof. + +25 So that's the clear unadulterated + +1 ruling of the Court as to that issue. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: And I understand that, +3 sir. My question to you is, if there is a +4 specific allegation in the complaint -- + +5 THE COURT: That was brought by +6 Mr. Epstein. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: -- that was brought by +8 Mr. Epstein against Mr. [REDACTED], does Your +9 Honor's ruling contemplate that we get to +10 prove that allegation is false? Without +11 getting into what exhibit we are going to +12 use to prove it's false, is there any issue +13 about the fact that if he alleged it in the +14 complaint and it's false, we get to prove +15 it's false? + +16 THE COURT: There's no issue as far as +17 I am concerned. + +18 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. I think +19 that helps a great deal, because I have been +20 hearing something entirely different +21 repeatedly from the other side. I didn't +22 understand how they can possibly be making +23 that argument that we weren't permitted to +24 prove the falsity of every false allegation +25 in the complaint. + +1 the three-filed cases were weak. Let's just + 2 look at that statement. + +3 They have the burden of proof and they + 4 come forward -- and I guess Mr. [REDACTED] gets + 5 on the stand and he says, Jury, these cases + 6 were strong. They paid \$5.2 million -- + +7 MR. SCAROLA: \$5.5 million. + +8 MR. LINK: -- \$5.5 million to settle + 9 them. I am now going to come forward and + 10 put on an expert -- I am going to put + 11 someone on to say that's a small number for + 12 these cases. These cases are weak, because, + 13 look, L.M. worked at a strip club. She an + 14 admitted prostitute, call girl. All of + 15 these things come into factoring. + +16 What I'm asking, Judge, is if we are + 17 trying a probable cause/malicious + 18 prosecution case, then I would suggest to + 19 you that none of the specific allegations + 20 can lead to a conclusion of probable cause + 21 or not. + +22 The overall flavor of the case, the + 23 overall complaint, when fairly read, + 24 absolutely comes into consideration. It + 25 does. Was there a reasonable basis to go + +1 forward with this lawsuit? But + 2 cherrypicking a sentence or two in he + 3 complaint to prove it's falsify doesn't help + 4 you or the jury determine probable cause. + +5 THE COURT: Again, I don't know how we + 6 found ourselves here. I just want to get + 7 back to the evidence. Again, I can't be + 8 making advisory opinions, orders, whatever + 9 the case might be. + +10 I want to get back to the individual + 11 evidence provisions. + +12 MR. LINK: Your Honor, I thank you for + 13 allowing me to finish. I appreciate it. + +14 THE COURT: We are back on the phone + 15 records. + +16 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, yes. I + 17 think we are on number ten, my client's + 18 phone records. I believe Your Honor has -- + +19 THE COURT: Yes. You gave those to me. + +20 MS. ROCKENBACH: I did indicate that + 21 they have nothing to do with what my client + 22 knew, what information he relied upon when + 23 he instituted the original proceeding. + +24 THE COURT: Mr. Scarola, your position + 25 on the phone records, please. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: The same as my position + 2 with regard to these other exhibits. I + 3 don't know what Mr. Epstein is going to + 4 attempt to demonstrate with regard to these + 5 underlying claims. + +6 If he is attempting to prove that they + 7 were fabricated, if he is defending against + 8 the assertion that these were well-founded, + 9 valuable claims, then the phone records may + 10 very well become relevant and material, + 11 because they include the names and telephone + 12 numbers of vast numbers of juveniles who + 13 were being sexually abused on a daily basis + 14 multiple times a day. + +15 They include the names and telephone + 16 numbers of other witnesses to that abuse, + 17 which form the basis for Mr. [REDACTED] seeking + 18 to take their depositions, because + 19 Mr. Epstein -- in the underlying cases, as + 20 he has in this case, asserted the Fifth + 21 Amendment privilege -- was not responding to + 22 questions. And so we needed to rely upon + 23 the testimony of third parties in order to + 24 establish the claims. The telephone records + 25 were part of the basis for identifying the + +1 third parties who we sought to take + 2 discovery from. + +3 So again, I really think that -- I + 4 haven't offered these. I don't know if I'm + 5 going to offer them. I won't talk about + 6 them unless and until I believe that a + 7 reasonable basis exists for me to do that, + 8 and then I will address that outside the + 9 presence of the jury. + +10 I don't know what else I can say with + 11 regard to this and all these other matters. + 12 We are going through this, and I'm going to + 13 say the same thing over again. + +14 So, for purposes of brevity, I will + 15 tell Your Honor that for future reference, I + 16 will simply say same argument. And now you + 17 know what it is I am adopting as the same + 18 argument. + +19 THE COURT: I rarely see you + 20 frustrated. I'm glad you're human like the + 21 rest of us. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: I clearly am, Your Honor. + 23 And I'm sorry there's frustration coming + 24 through in my voice, but there is + 25 frustration in my heart and in my mind. + +THE COURT: Not a problem. + +2 It is the same ruling. Again, if the 3 issue is one of reasonable discovery and 4 why -- and if Mr. Epstein is going to cl: that somehow Mr. was oft on a 6 goose chase, then clearly the fact that he 7 was seeking to discover these phone records 8 and the purpose for the discovery would be 9 appropriate. + +However, at this juncture, as an exhibit that is the guts of the phone :2 records, as a matter of relevancy, as a :1 matter of privacy -- and I don't see anything in here with names -- they are just '1 numbers. + +XS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. That's correct. + +THE COUR,: SO I'm going t0 make the '9 same ruling es I did on number nine. + +70 XS. ROCKKHRACK: Thank you, /Our Honor. The same argument for phone 72 records, which 1 can bring to the bench. They do not have names. They have numbers. + +74 THE COURT: Mr. Scarola has indicated 25 that would be the same Objection. It would + +3 be the save ruling. (cc Jail visitation logs. S a llelri c same ruling. + +4 Jeffrey Hpetein's ti f . + +6 Let's speak about that WS. mOCKI4H8ACK: V or, this would + +7 also implicate probation file would + +trigger part of a dente code that Mr. SC& refer earlier, which was + +'s 90.4 12 His probation file is akin to + +logs or any aspect of the + +:2 Imams action, which we are not trying in :3 se. Similar fact evidence of other + +s, wrongs or acts are inadmissible when + +the evidence is solely to prove bad + +:6 character and propensity. And that's + +90.4O4(2). Mr. Sterol& keeps referring to the :8 + +second subsection of that evidence code, :9 + +20 which is subsection B. And it says in a + +criminal case in which a defendant is 71 + +72 charged with a crime involving child molestation, then this evidence becomes + +relevant. + +>5 Your Honor did actually already make a + +10 11 12 13 34 This is not a molestation case. The probable cause affidavits that related to the criminal investigation are absolutely irrelevant to this malicious prosecution case. And if there was any remote relevant probative value to introducing them and parading then around the jury to tell the jury about what probable cause may have existed in these affidavits, absolutely prejudice my not receive a fair t would nd be would tion. + +15 ta 17 Is THE COURT: Is Mr. Scarola, t would be i Court ne anything specific, nk of that file that the bout now? + +It 20 MA. Nothing Your Honor needs about w. Same argument. + +21 22 2 CONEY: Okay. Same argument. Same Again, this would be akin -- to an analogy -- to in a personal Injury Otten listing the plaintiff's employment file. And that would carry with it the Same + +2 How, if there were certain things in the employment file that would relevant, for example, there may be something fn an + +10 But simply Stating probation file without any specifics would be the same ruling. I am sustaining the objection. + +11 MS. ROCKRIMACII: Thank you. Your Honor. + +12 33 Same argument for number IS, the victims' statements to the FBI. + +14 THR COURT: We are actually on 14. + +15 XS. ROCKRIABACIO All probable Cause + +16 37 18 affidavits. Yes. I indicated that that would be the same argument, because it relates to criminal investigation. + +19 THE COURT: Same argument? + +20 MA. SCAEOLA: I would only point out. + +21 22 Your Honor, that clearly to the extent eh:, had that sworn testimony + +23 when he initiated both his civil lawsuit -- + +24 23 his civil lawsuits, and when he relied upon that in pursuing discovery, it's obviously + +ruling -- or at least discussed that code section in relation to the federal code. which isn't applicable. + +general objection. + +eaployment file that shows a pre-existing injury of sore sort, then that would be - that may mall be relevant. + +relevant and material, depending upon what 1 + +Kr. Scarola. + +2 Mr. Epstein attempts to say. so it Is tb' KR. SCAROLA2 Yes. Your Honor, I just 3 same argument. want to supplement my argument in this + +4 THE COURT: I am going to defer on respect. He have been focusing on -- in S number 14. t think that that is more those Comments in particular -- on the 6 specific. I think it is potentially proprietary or reasonableness of 2 critical to the analysis as It relates t. conduct, and whether Jeffrey + +a the strength of the cases that are involved. Epstein was in a position to consider what !Cl regarding his position. Rut I also 10 conclusion that Mr. was a knowing understand Mr. Scarola's argument regarding II participate in a Pon:i scheme and + +9 I understand Mr. Link's argument . was happening as contributing to a .2 the fact that somehow they have to prove 17 fabricating claim: against m. .3 their probable cause case. And it's just II I think it's impo hat we + +:4 not going to be Mr. Epstein's objective II articulate what the ble se standard .5 position that needs to be heard. IS is. And I think the ybe I am in :6 All right. Next is number 15. 16 agreement wit oppo ounsel, but I want '' "Victims' statements to the RBI related t0 11 to be sur I ha stated it in what I + +.8 the criminal investigation of Jeffrey is consider to be n appropriate fashion. + +'9 Epstein." It The ue a, would an objectively 20 MS. ROCRRRHACII: Your Honor, I have a 20 le and caution person -- that's the COPY Of these if the Court would like to 2t part of the formula -- knowing :2 review them. They were produced by 22 wha ffrey Epstein knew -- that's the + +23 Mr. scarola. They are approximately six 7 a jective portion of formula -- have :4 pages. But they are absolutely irrelevant, 4 robable cause to believe that :5 Inflammatory. Prejudicial for my Client in fabricated the claims against + +• this action. Victims' statements they 1 Jeffrey Epstein and was a knowing 2 relate to the criminal case. 2 participant in a massive l'Orlii scheme. + +3 THE 060RT: Off the d. So there is both en objective and a 4 12. discussion was of h °cord.) subjective component. s MS. ROCKENHACH: ur Hon r i quickly And when we talk about things like 6 looked at the names on articular phone records and address book and a to E.Y., L.M., J who were b Epstein knew about the existence of those 3 reprove by Kr. arils. ROT that reason il PhOne records. Hs know about the address '0 they er t relevant. 10 books. He knew about the appointment book' :2 t • + +' victims' state\* and they do not relate appointment 1200kS and airplane logib Jeffrey : now is Court has already sold you 22 and the airplane logs showing that children :2 901e44 to allow or constructively 22 were being transported on those jet planes. of the sexual abuse/assault claims. 13 He knew what was happening to those children that is what this will be pointing to. II on those jet planes. Re knew some 40 + +5 THE COURT: Okay. I have read them. 15 children had reported virtually identical :6 It IS the same argument, same ruling. that 26 crimes to law enforcement. :7 is, that if it comes to a point where there 27 SO those are all things that he know. :9 Mr. acted in manner that was rash, 29 to bring other children, too. He knew he 20 that was in a manner that was without f0 paid the three victims that are named in 2: forethought, that he did not properly 21 complaints not only \$200 24 brought on behalf of the three young women, 24 to his. And he specified what it was he 25 then again we will revisit. 25 wanted and what would gather a premium an., + +:a is a contention by Mr. Epstein that 26 He knew that he was paying children a bounty 12 discover those issues that are -- that would 22 per sexual massage, but also paid them 2 or 23 form the basis of the claims that were 23 6300 for each other child that they brought + +2 l what wouldn't gather a premium. So when we talk about things like. ill he know these were strong claims independent 4 5 6 7 S of the parade of horrible, that he lists there about these young girls - incidentally, the vast majority of which things, if not all of them, occurred aft, he abused these children. + +from seven down now to where we are -- and that's number IS -- is that while it is absolutely conceivable that this intonation -- some of this information may be relevant, what I'm trying to deal with here and distinguish is a discussion about what Mr. Epstein may or may not have Snow, and the actual introduction of the record-, which I don't believe have any real + +9 As the sworn deposition of G.M. '0 indicates, she was -- and I think I have 20 probative value themselves. That's a already referenced this in prior argument to 21 distinction. + +'7 the Court. She was a middle school student 22 I don't want a jury get g bound up in '3 doing well. She was doing well 23 trying to locate six pho rs that say :4 academically. She was participating in 14 be similar, or six tl Ind dual phone '5 extracurricular activities. 15 entry la listed, end a atically assume + +.6 While she has a difficult home life, It li that it may hev in o do in .7 had not impacted upon her personal conduct 27 particular h hese three young 5 In any way that brought her in contact the 28 ladies t t Mr arcs represented. :0 resulted In her engaging In the kind of 20 0 isitation logs. All of th080 :2 that she has alleged to have been involved 22 wit a competing claims of knowledge, :3 in, which all occurred after Jeffrey Epstein 2 t ngth or weaknesses of the cases -- all + +'2 criminal law or in any way whatsoever that 19 The t g with the probation file conduct, like stripping, or anything else 21 IlIle they may have something to dO :4 had abused her. 4 f which, again, despite my disagreement, at :5 so these are things that Epstein knew, least in some regard with Mr. Link -- and + +• I appreciate the Court's concern 1 those things being relevant to discuss as 7 this focused on the claims of W., 2 far as what Mr. had to sustain hi: 3 4 5 6 Jane Doe. But that is foeu f me on L.M., G.M. and Jane T s hat Epstein knew about the trengt f their claims. + +7 This is no Ingle, isolated 9 victim. se ar t three isolated s what Your Honor said. I am in absolute o victi were abused on a Single 10 agreement. I am not even going to offer • a . :I was part of an extraordinary II them unless they fit that pattern. + +claims, the actual documents themselves, unless there's an issue as to they don't exist. Or there never were any phone records, or there never was a flight log. that's a different story. + +8 Incident. This a single, isolate) s MA. SCAROLA: I take Lieue with none of + +.2 ttern •f abuse. 22 They have been listed here because we 3 d that's why I am suggesting too, 23 are obliged to list them. all exhibits that r Honor, that I simply need to adopt the 14 may reasonably become relevant and material. + +:5 same argument. I'm not going to offer any 15 THE COURT: Fair enough. And I think '4 of this evidence unless and until I satisfy 16 that's the value of the discussion that we - 7 the Court that it's relevant and material. 27 are having here today, that we can narrow + +- 8 And that's all I can say. 18 some of issues -- narrow the intent of what + +-, THE COURT: In this particular victim 29 these documents are sought for reasons -- 20 statement dated 5/30/2009, it's from a Shana 20 for the reasons why they're sought to be 7: L.R., who I don't believe has anything to do 21 potentially introduced. 72 with this particular case -- these three 22 Again, I don't think it's -- I think + +73 cases, that I'm aware of. 23 it's a good exercise. So let's go ahead and + +.74 And the point I'm trying to make as it 24 proceed further. + +25 relates to these exhibits that are listed 25 MS. ROCAS:MACE: Your Honor, number 16 + +1 is the video of the search warrant of my + 2 client's home -- while being executed, the + 3 search. I don't have the video, but I + 4 presume by that -- it wasn't produced, but I + 5 presume by that description, it is the same + 6 ruling. + +7 THE COURT: The same ruling as in 17, + 8 the application for the search warrant is + 9 sustained. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: Let me just point out to + 11 Your Honor that the reason why that's listed + 12 is because the victims, including these + 13 three, give detailed descriptions of where + 14 they were in the house and what the interior + 15 looked like. And all of that is + 16 corroborated by the search warrant video. + +17 THE COURT: Again, it's with the + 18 proviso and caveat that I will re-examine + 19 each of these exhibits, if need be, when the + 20 context is pointed out. But for now, the + 21 same ruling is being issued. + +22 MS. ROCKENBACH: Number 18 -- actually, + 23 17. It's identified on the exhibit list by + 24 Mr. [REDACTED] as the application for a search + 25 warrant of my client's home. And it's + +1 possible that by mistake Mr. Scarola's + 2 office produced a different document, + 3 because what was produced in this context + 4 was an order sealing affidavit and + 5 application for search warrant and related + 6 search warrant and inventory in return. And + 7 attached to that were the subpoenas to the + 8 custodian of records for BellSouth, T-Mobile + 9 and Cingular. So it looks like phone + 10 records. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: Sounds like the wrong + 12 exhibit. + +13 MS. ROCKENBACH: Sounds like the wrong + 14 exhibit, but we would object to -- on the + 15 same basis that the application for the + 16 search warrant of Mr. Epstein's home would + 17 not be relevant, would be prejudicial -- + +18 THE COURT: I have already indicated + 19 the same as to number 17. + +20 MS. ROCKENBACH: Eighteen, Your Honor, + 21 is the complaint. + +22 THE COURT: That, again, is typically a + 23 matter of judicial notice, so we will deal + 24 with it, if we need to, at a later time. + +1 accounts and any/all records related to + 2 Jeffrey Epstein's assets." + +3 MS. ROCKENBACH: That was not produced, + 4 along with this passport. Nineteen and 20 + 5 have not been produced. But I presume that + 6 this somehow relates to the punitive + 7 damages. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: It does. + +9 MS. ROCKENBACH: And there was a + 10 stipulation by my client in discovery -- I + 11 think it was discovery answers -- about net + 12 worth that was in excess -- + +13 THE COURT: We talked about that. + 14 Mr. Scarola -- and understandably so -- is + 15 not going to accept that stipulation. + +16 So eventually, there is going to have + 17 to be further discussion. I presume that's + 18 part of the motion to compel on Thursday. + +19 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: It arises in the context + 21 of the Fifth Amendment assertion to requests + 22 for admission and our being able to draw + 23 adverse inferences from those requests. + +24 It has to do with responses to + 25 questions during the course of deposition. + +1 And, yes, there's a motion to compel, + 2 because we believe that the Fifth Amendment + 3 assertion with regard to some aspects of + 4 what have been requested -- for example, + 5 disclosures to banks -- would not be covered + 6 by the Fifth Amendment. That would be a + 7 waiver with regard to anything that was + 8 disclosed to third parties. + +9 Tax returns, same thing. Waiver. + +10 THE COURT: Deeds. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: Deeds, airplane + 12 registrations. + +13 THE COURT: That's fine. We will take + 14 them up, if it's necessary, at the + 15 appropriate time. + +16 Twenty is Mr. Epstein's passport. + 17 Again, I think that has to do somewhat with + 18 the issues we discussed as to the flight + 19 logs. + +20 Driver's license. I don't know what + 21 that might be relevant to. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +23 THE COURT: Same ruling. I will + 24 sustain the objection at this time. + +2 3 4 S Mr. Epstein. t presume that has to do with number 19 and the punitive damage claim. KR. SCARO1A: It does. Your Honor. THE COURT: We will deal with that at a later time. + +I are deferring, Your Honor, until you hear testimony. And it sounds like the door would be that my client didn't know the ;q' of the three clients of Kr. + +THE COVET: At this point, yes. 6 XS. ROCKLIMACR: Twenty-three through MS. ROCKMHBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. 7 26 have not been produced. And I presume -- Humber 28 is similar to what you ruled •0 yearbooks would implicate -- I don't know to This is notepads found in Mr. Epstein's home 't who they would implicate, actually. Quite 12 and/or doing trash pulls outside of his home + +0 well, 23 says it's the yearbooks of Jane upon the last hearing, which was number 7. 9 Doe. Hut I presume that these other messages taken from Mr. Hpstein's home. '2 honestly, they are vague. And I can't see 12 during the criminal investig en. 't what relevance these vague yearbooks are 11 We are not in the c + +4 going to have in the malicious prosecution 14 investigation. We ar tryin that case. 'S action. 15 And notepads or trash ed outside my \*6 THE COURT: Same argument. ti client's home I irr- vs , prejudicial and + +M.R. SCAROLA: These reflect the IT should not 1 oduc :5 appearance of the victims at the time that ts THE f• you have any of those' '2 Mr. Epstein was abusing them. Your Honor, to It Have you iv copies? 20 the extent there might be any argument that 20 ROCKRUHACH: T did. yes, 28, 1 :2 defense as a matter of law, but it might be 22 tar. hibit. SO -- and you will See :2 argued in litigation if he were to try to 2th -- :4 contend -- he may try to contend that his 4 may I approach, Your Honor? 2s abuses of minors were inadvertent and + +he was unaware. And that Obviously Is not a 21 "piing. I think it was a very + +THE COVET: Sure. Okay, again, I have + +• therefore less culpable. And we show 1 reviewed these materials. I am going to 2 pictures of these victims from h 2 wake the same finding I made earlier, the i jury could draw their own lu to impact upon the issues as to preparedness. 4 whether this wee inadve knowledge -- as far as Kr. is + +S It is not a defen as a er of law. concerned -- his diligence as to discovery. is children or not I cally requesting s had these materials probably will be able to + +6 They were either of age of age. And if those are called into question, then 7 he was either a fleetly requesting these may be discussed. The fact that he 2 child e y rats, they could il te discussed. '0 clea a relevance in that regard. And 20 The actual documentation themselves, \*2 - . + +m offering them at this point. 11 though. again. I think would be excessive are there In the event this becomes 12 and would be getting into other matters that 23 24 would not be germane to the three young women who were involved here. + +THE COURT: 1 feel comfortable deferring on 23 through 26. Twenty-seven is '6 the same. It overruled in part. + +15 So in essence, it's sustained in parr. + + 9 XS. R0CKRNBACM: As earlier -- as 14, 17 XS. R0CKEIIBACH: Haber 29 is the Palm 8 and 15. 18 Beach State Attorney's Criminal file. It'- + +', THE COURT: The same as actually -- 19 over 2,000 pages. I have a Sampling for 20 MS. ROCHE/48ACR: Seventeen. 20 Your Honor to look at if you're interested. + +2: THE COURT: So the same ruling. 21 THE COURT: No. Same ruling. And that + +72 MS. R0CKENBACM: Same ruling for 27, 22 is, if it gets to the issue like we + +73 which is sustained? 23 discussed -- I'm going to repeat myself -- 74 THE COURT: Yes 24 then the fact that's it's a 2,000-page :5 MS. ROCEENTIACII: And 23 through 26, you 23 criminal investigation file that Mr. + +had sore access to formulate his position as 2 to the legitimacy of these three claims, if those are called into question -- because 4 there are that busy equivocation regarding the legitimacy of those claims -- then 6 again, it may come into play. + +7 The fact that there was a criminal file 9 prepared -- no surprise to anyone -- 9 be a aurprise to the Jury. But the individual pages therein would have to be 1 further discussed at a later time. + +Mr. Scarola. + +') MM. SCAROLA: Your Honor, this is one :4 of the circumstances where the distinction '5 that I referenced before probably becomes '4 very clear. That is, during the course of a criminal prosecution, these criminal files probably would not have been available to '9 . He may have had the sane :0 information from other sources. Rut they • obviously were entirely available to Jeffrey :2 + +:3 So these would have a significant :4 impact on what Mr. Epstein knew in order to :5 make a determination as to what a reasonably + +1 objective person could or could upon in forming probable cause THE COURT: Again, I'm d + +4 7 9 with the sanitizing - attempting to sanitize ability, and to carve o between the thr the globaley~ Dives think it 1 :0 here. 0 t of our distinguish Six, that are brought in t that was done. And rtinent to the analysis + +agaif the compilation of the file :2 had knowledge and the of the file -- even if he didn't have s to it. which would be likely -- then that would be relevant. as I said. to :6 Mr. + +:8 :9 :0 >1 02 >3 Also, I agree With Mr. Starah that certainly the sheer amount of the file would have been known to Mr. Epstein, at least should have been known by Mr. Epstein. And that say be something you may or may not ask him. But that should have been known to him at time he filed the lawsuit. + +25 MS. ROCKENBACK: It was not, Your Honor. I have been informed it was not. 10 But again, the global ruling is the individual entries, unless there's something that is brought to my attention, would not be subject to admission. But the likelihood that the significance, if you will, of the file, the volume of a file would be particularly important as to Mr. Epstein': knowledge prior to filing the suit. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor. I'm sure + +12 23 34 25 to Ms. Rockenbach wouldn't into misrepresent any fact to could we know the bas that Mr. Epstein did the criminal c natty rt, but aiming eve discovery in + +27 Ie It 20 21 22 MS. Client w wrong, bu don't think that my lieges\* I could be t imagine my client would ass to the Pall Beach County State s criminal file. I'm not sure how t would get his hands on the State Ac rney'S file. + +THE COURT: Again, we will have t0 figure that out as we go along. + +4 KR. \$CAROLA: Roll, I'm sure it's a reflection of Ms. Rockenbach not doing + +10 11 So if it's simply a matter of XS. Rockenbach not being familiar with that procedure, I understand that. But I want the record reflect there's no basis in rt,n record to suggest that Jeffrey Epstein did not have all of the discovery to which he 12 was entitled in the criminal case. + +criminal practice. But those of us who have engaged in criminal practice know that all evidence in the hands of the State Attorney is require to be turned over to the defense in the context of a criminal prosecution. + +13 THE COURT: I think it's sore a matte,: 24 of timing that I am concerned with. And 15 that is. at the time he filed the suit 14 versus whenever that information may have 27 been turned over could be very distinct. + +II MR. SOAROLA: He was well into the 19 defense of his criminal prosecution at the 20 time. + +21 MAX COURT: By December of 20092 + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +23 MS. ROCKKHOACM: I do believe, Your 24 Honor, though, that we are getting very fd-25 astray from probable cause -- which I + +appreciate Mr. Scarola's assistance with the 2 knowledge of the criminal -- because I have 3 not practiced -- I did do some appellate 4 criminal work when I clerked at the Fourth S District Court of Appeals, but that was a 6 'tracts& ago. + +7 But the probable cause Issue is not 8 whether or not my client knew about the 9 State Attorney's file or the 2,000 documents. It is whether my client had probable cause to institute the original proceeding based on a reasonable belief that Mr. participated or had connection '4 to Mr. Rothstein's Pepsi scam. And that's \$ the defamation by way of the Jury :6 instruction for probable cause, which is 406.4. + +.8 So I'm not going anywhere outside of the Florida Supreme Court jury instruction :0 definition end the case law. + +But all of these exhibits that we are -- and the Court is incredibly patient :3 with us going through -- relate to the 24 Criminal action and the criminal -- we are 25 now on the Palm Beach County Stet. + +4 S Attorney's criminal file. So I q whether my client had it or no is irrelevant. It is an issue w trying in this case, an ar o rying he criminal action. + +0 THE COURT: I unde But it gets back to his kn0 his constructive ramifica4ns or his accountability, (Woof the ential ramifications that toultiarise when he filed this lawsuit lace. And those are all :2 as far as this Court is concerned, :3 am shown something otherwise by way the case law. + +:5 So let's move on. I would rather go :6 forward -- just to give you my thoughts on -7 the subject. + +:0 Again, t am always inviting anyone to :9 bring cases to my attention that may serve '0 to change my mind, or at least influence the 7: decisions that I am going to make. + +22 MS. ROCKENBACK: Than you, Your Honor. 23 It seemed Your Honor was sustaining, but I 24 want to make sure I understand. + +25 THE COVET: I have already explained + +10 21 22 23 This is not irrelevant under 401, it' prejudicial under 403. and it also implicates the conviction of rtain cries, of impeachment under 90. + +:4 15 to 27 le It We discussed thi Youi honor at prior hearing on Nov 29th about a procedure to d0 a witness on the eta -ver been convicted of a eel involving dishonesty. If they s o.jhen you can absolutely use 20 a to impeach their lying under oath. 2: COURT: Remember we had that 22 die On between credibility and a factual 2 is e. that being relevancy, whether or not \ 4 omething tends to prove or disprove a material fact. That's how we distinguished + +it. tt is in the record. + +MS. ROCKEHBACII: Hest are the documents related to Mr. Epstein's conviction. They weren't produced. I don't know what precise documents they were, but I really don't think it matters, because it relates to the criminal conviction and his plea colloquy that was heard before -- I believe it was Judge Debbie Pucillo on June 30, 2008. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: T only wanted to point out to Your Honor that a comment was made by Mr. Goldberger earlier today that's relevant to this discussion, and that is, he said that Jeffrey Epstein did not plead guilty to crimes involving these three victims. I don't believe that that is supported by th.. record. + +11 12 13 24 15 It I think what the record reflects -- and Your Honor has a copy Of the conviction. a0 you might be able to correct mr. if I'm wrong, because it's been a while since I saw them. But I don't think that there is a victim nosed, strangely, in those pleas. + +27 28 29 20 21 22 In fact, when Mr. Epstein vas asked who did he plead guilty to prostituting or soliciting for prostitution, his response was, I don't remember. I don't know who it was that I pled guilty to soliciting for prostitution. + +23 24 25 THE COURT: For reasons that may have to do with the minority status of the victims, it states -- has Mr. Epstein's + +it the last time. + +Mr. Scarola. + +name, guilty plea checked off by way of an 2 X. two case numbers. Charge: felony the minor victim. It's AD. It is not ono 3 solicitation of prostitution count one, of Mr. clients. 8 third degree felony; procuring Person under During Judge Pucillo's colloquy. AD is + +Second, in the colloquy, it identifies + +5 10 for prostitution, second degree felony. the minor that relates to that one count. + +6 It goes on by indicating the Rut there is nothing in the record there 7 presentence investigation. PSI was not that suggests child molestation or any pin 8 required or waived. The sentencing; credit to child molestation. '0 conditions, including the registration and le it. When someone is pleading guilty and is '2 presentation of DNA sample, as is required 32 prostitution, I am not carts that's not a '3 in these types of pleas. And no 23 form of child soleststio again, I a, :4 unsupervised context with minors, et cetera. 34 not here to parse wor + +9 for time served; other comments or TAX COVRT: It depends how you look at • designation as a sexual offender; 11 convicted of procuring a person under 18 for + +'5 YR. SCAROLA: My recollection is -- 15 She bottom line S at if St was a \*6 THE COORS: To my knowledge, leafing ti civil action di ectl e1 ed to the '7 through this, there is no specific 17 criminal pr 8 designation of the victim by mime or le understa ing is hat the Plml ". a '9 Initials. It certified y the plea would be + +on again, my global 20 DO fled. 20 ed into evidence. + +MR. SCAROLA: That is my understanding 21 because of the uncertainty, l'- 93 SO when Mr. Epstein pleads guilty and and a knowledgeable one. for that matter. + +99 es well. And the criminal complaints that 22 01 o defer ruling on this particular 23 resulted in those guilty pleas had to do, 1 2 is e until really further information is :4 believe• with a long list of individuals. 4 ',eloped In order to rake a COgent decision + +S ISSY 3 that that is clearly a pr ve t at three individuals that Mr. 8 the jury can take into de i in 1 represented, the likelihood is I am going to s adjudging the strength f them ree cases, sustain the objection. 6 because he didn't say 1 one of these MR. SCAROLA: Vor whatever assistant.? 8 don't remember w t as. And that clearly b the child who introduced N.W. to Jeffrey 3 Is a at At fr which the jury could il Epstein and was pa id for bringing her to '0 coact de, rticularly in light of all the 20 Jeffrey Epstein the first time. • t n t assertions from which 21 TRE COVET: Again, that may have '9 • ern •:Vacation can be drawn when he 12 everything to 00 with the case that was '1 to acknowledge he even knew any of 23 tried as to E.W.'s case. Again, those + +• is unable to identify who it is t pled 1 Same thing with the plea column. If it 9 guilty to molesting. I suggest r 9 doesn't have anything to do with any of the + +2 three individua Whim he said was, I it may be to the Court, I believe that AD is + +se three girls. 24 tangential issues were something that were + +:5 Those circumstances taken together 15 of extreme concern for the Court when it '6 clearly are relevant and material in making 26 comes to this malicious prosecution clef-. '7 a determination as to the viability of these 27 and the continue concern about undue + +'8 three claims. 28 information, and part of the reason why I am + +- 3 Y.R. LINK: Your Honor, if I may. 19 going to defer, but also keeping that very 20 Mr. Scarola is dead wrong. He did not plead 20 much in the forefront of my consideration. 91 guilty to child molestation. You have just 21 that being undue inflammatory information 22 seen the plea. 22 being imparted to the trier of fact. + +23 I know you have asked us not to do 23 Number 32 is, "List of properties and 74 rhetoric. That is pure rhetoric. That is 24 vehicles in Larry Visoski's, V-I-S-0-S-Y-', 25 not the plea. 23 + +He's one of the pilots. 1 XR. LINK: Yes, sir. 3 THE COciti: Relevancy? 4 YR. SCAROLA: HAS to do with the transfer of assets out of Jeffrey Epstein's 6 name, Your Honor. + +7 And again, I don't know that that's going to become a matter that we need to 9 deal with. It's listed. My argument is what my argument was. + +THE COVET: Thank you. Again, that would be deferred until it needs to be -- + +3 YR. LINK: Your Honor, may I interrupt 4 for one second? Do you mind? + +:5 THE COCK,: Pardon me? 6 XR. LINK: Do you mind if I interrupt for one second? + +8 3 know we are getting plead where you told us we could be, but I thought it might :0 be helpful if T Clarify heard you say that we have been equivocating -- I don't 22 think you mean OUr teem, but I think over the years \*gins's/eating, and I would like to 34 put that to rest if I can. It right help us '5 going forward if you give me two minOt es. + +3 4 MR. LINK: If you don' in THE COURT: Not at + +6 XR. LINK: So the is no etivocation + +9 never speak in I aft like Mr. Sterols does, bu I would y to get to at least • 0 row; + +know we are wrapping up now anyva THE COUNT: Sure. + +about this. And I want these words as carefully as a, Your Honor. I can + +2 :3 r. at I mean. The lawsuits were initiated in 2000 was a sole practitioner. + +:6 them is when Xr. Epstein was serving time in jail and is subject to the non-prosecution + +:a agreement. We have never taken -- we are not taking the position -- we are not taking + +:9 :0 the position for this trial that the filing of those three lawsuits were a fabrication. + +72 During that time frame, pursuant to the EPA, Mr. Epstein was not permitted to defend + +73 the merits -- he was allowed to challenge the amount of damages they were seeking. but + +25 he was not allowed under the non-prosecution + +During that time period when he filed + +10 31 That doesn't mean that Mr. Epstein agreed with every single thing these folk: said, or that he thought the amount they were seeking was reasonable. + +32 13 15 34, lb But I want it to be cle that we are not intending to introdu nee that. from when he was a so r, that the three cases were toted or made up, or that the vas ricated or used as part of + +It All on takes ween April 9, '09, when t that we have focused 20 N Joins the Rothstein fir, and 29 eaves. + +agreement, essentially, to challenges liability. + +So there is nothing that we're saying that took place between the filing in 2008 and when he joins Mr. Rothstein's first that we are calling into question as being fabricated. + +22 0 One of the things this court has 2ASSV as that I think is really important -- and 4 understand your ruling -- you and I have a little disagreement about the way we think + +.4I 1 + +10 point to words where It says there was a fabrication and whO made that fabrication. + +11 12 the word that you pointed to was the word weak. And were going to have a trial + +23 14 over whether the cases were weak or not weak to somebody's subjective level. + +15 16 But I want to be sure that it's really clear, because all the things we've been + +17 18 talking about -- the criminal activity, the + +19 20 arrest records, the flight logs -- all of that relates to, in my view, none of the + +21 activity that is from April 9th, '09 backwards -- April 9, '09 backwards -- I may + +22 23 have misspoken. I will clarify that in a second. + +24 25 And what t mean by that is this. The cases that were filed by Mr. S he h. + +it should go, but that happens to be almost every day in the courtroom. But you have + +made it really clear that we have to stanl behind the allegations of the complaint. + +And I'm taking Your Honor as saying that literally, that the plaintiff, too, + +doesn't get to come in and say words that aren't in the complaint, that they have t: + +probable cause to file them. We Sr. not 2 saying that he didn't. We are not challenging his bringing those cases, and we 4 ore not going to complain about those cases. + +1 So information that led up to an arrest 6 for phone records wouldn't only come in if 7 we were saying those three cases in 2008 • were fabricated. We're not saying that. 9 We're not saying that at all. + +What I'm hearing we are going to be doing in this trial is trying three :2 molestation cases. These three victims these three plaintiffs are going to get on the stand and we are going to try the '1 molestation case. Were they touched? Where were they touched? When were they touched? How many times were they touched? Whet did 'a they look like? What's their emotional '1 reaction to It? Have they suffered damages? 20 Have they become strippers as a result or the touching? That's what we're talking 22 about trying in this malicious prosecution it action. + +24 /HE COURT: I am not Sure we have been 25 in the Same COurtroom. That's fins if you + +4 6 7 are under that Impression. Again, I am not here to a questions or to give advise make advisory statement do here today is tryin much as this evidence a ying to rough as to determine whether or not. least On their fee's, it • would be ad:Meal 9 oGnIsai a and grated in part: is the '0 Obi(' I stained in part, denied in part, • art: whatever the case might would be deferred: :2 would like to get back to that use the few more minutes to -- + +MR. LINK: Do you mind if I just see :6 what I just misstated so I can fix It on the record if I need to? It will take me 10 seconds. + +MR. scAROLA: If Mr. Link is offering a 20 stipulation that allegations in the complaints on behalf of B.M., L.M. and Jane 22 Doe as filed by were 72 well-founded allegations. I will accept that 74 stipulation, and that may help to abbreviate 25 some of the issues that we have been facing. 12 11 14 TRK COURT: Mr. Link, are you willing to stipulate that the actions brought by Mr. on behalf of the three individuals that we have listed by way of 11 either initials or Jane Dee that have been at canter of this cont rovers were brought in good faith, and that gations we'', well-founded? + +25 37 15 It 20 Ms. LINK: The distinction, and that's this. Y brought in good faith. Ca a the allegations are true? I an't a CI t at, Your Honor, We never put m the test because we + +21 22 dn't represent Mr. Epstein at that think -- when you ask me would T everything that was pled was true, I an't say that. + +20 21 MR. LINK: Thank you, Your Honor. I hope ay stipulation helped. MK COURT: All right, we are up to number 40? + +12 23 MS. RCCKENRACH: I think we were at a3. I wish we were at 40. + +24 15 788 COURT: We did 32. MS. ROCKKI1BACX: We did 32. + +26 27 788 COURT: I indicated that 35 is the next highlighted one. + +28 29 20 22 22 That again, is a matter judicial notice, and depending upon whatever evidentiary value ft may have, those are just answers in affirmative defenses in the civil cases against his. + +23 24 MS. ROCKKNBACM: Your Honor, I'm sorry. I think we also objected to 33. + +23 ink COURT: I don't have it + +THR COURT: I think that's what Mr. Link has offered. + +MR. SCAROLS: t thought that that's what it was, but I want that -- that's an important stipulation. There ought not to be any ambiguity. + +COURT: But you are saying Mere + +willing to stipulate that they were all sade in good faith? + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir, absolutely. THE COURT: So stipulated. Thank you. That Can be typed up and brought to the Court's attention, if nee rrrrr y, during the pendency of litigation. + +highlighted. 1 4 THE COURT: Responses to requests for in a large number of pending civil action:. 5 production, requests for admission, answers and to escape liability for an even largo-5 to interrogatories in this matter. And then number of potential criminal prosecution:. 7 there's a list of about 10 or so cases. while the limitation that Your Honor 8 Y.S. ROCKKHEACH: Those were not the has described applies to the probable eau-9 case before you in division AG. And th:: issue for the reasons that Your Honor hat 'o case number, you can -- lo stated, those reasons have no applicabil i tv '1 THE COURT: You're talking about AB? 31 when it comes to talking about motive and '2 MS. RCCKEHBACH: Yes. These are all 12 malice. 3 '00 eases, '09 cases. 1 presume they are -- 33 When it comes to to ut motive :2 Your Honor, perhaps Mr. Sterol/. can 14 and malice, t respect sugge the jury :6 relevant to this action. la would take the is fi a malicious '7 Bringing in discovery from other 27 lawsuit, d he h e to gain by doing .8 laminate seems to be creating mini• is that. :o THE COURT: Well, depending upon the 20 tilA000 encs ' prosecutorial :2 depending upon its relevance to the lawsuit 22 infi44lOile l ' decisions with '3 that we are dealing with here, things like rd to a large number of other pending :4 requests for admissions maybe. pursuant to '5 the law. transferable to a similar case. at::::::::t:011al:deev: naer:::f:::n:::::::1:0 + +He had the OSsistince of the University 2 tat. SCAROLA: I don't have It of Utah law professor Paul Cassell. So his 3 highlighted on mine either. motive was to escape or reduce his liability '5 tell us the relevance, but they would not be 23 needs to understand wh is that somebody '9 again within this suit. lt And h d CO gain was not simply nature of the discovery, and obviously 22 . with regard to three cases, but to 2\11 + +?C SHCASr' • Answers to interrogatories, the s ing. 1 spend the rest of his life in jail. 4 that are not stated un th. 1 does arise when we start talking about why 5 So what's your po clan, r Sterols? are we going to be talking about all of a YA. SC/JIMA: Let state these other claims. 7 broadly, Your H that as has been Your Honor is right. There are a acknowledged in I argument before the K specific admissions included within those 0 • t. d is our theory of the case that 11 on a coordinated basis 6044 make a very t2 (fury r.. Coin singled out is significant difference in terms of motive. :3 he was leading a joint prosecution 23 Thank you, sir. '6 and that Brad was singled out, not only 36 up on an issue-by-issue basis in order to '7 because of his leadership role, but because 27 determine the relevancy. :5 he faced a particular vulnerability. 28 Thirty-five, again, are the answers t '9 And what Mr. Epstein was attempting to 29 affirmative defenses in all civil cases 7c, do was to extort into either 20 against him. Same ruling. t ax going to :: abandoning or compromising the interest of 21 have Co take those up on an issue-by-issue 72 his clients and backing off on the 22 basis. 7) prosecution of the Criss Victims' Rights Act 2) Thirty-six. All complaints in which 74 ease. which Mr. was prosecuting on a 24 Epstein was a defendant, same ruling. 1 25 pro bono bosis almost independently. 25 will have to take those up on an individual + +7 Those things that are stated u r o r So that's the relevance and materiality 3 a more concrete type of aff t th m that we have not directly addressed yet that 2 Court, • is cl sly an issue with regard . other pleadings. Rut the sere existence of to iv intent on Jeffrey EPStein'S 30 those other cases that were being prosecutoi t that included a number of other 24 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you as well. :5 lawyers prosecuting multiple other cases, 25 Again, f am going to have to take these + +basis. In other words, that means that I'm I that now, as well. 2 going to defer. The video footage of the walk-through + +3 The newspaper articles, online articles site inspection of Epstein's home is + +4 or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. probably likely to closely resemble that of 4 XS. ROOM/MACH: Number 40 was not punitive damages, although it way be also 6 produced. Actually, Mr. scarola and I can this issue of whether or not there's going a might be sane that I agree to. that -- to any of the individuals who are at 9 MR. SCAROLA: They were produced in issue, and their memory as to whether or not '1 have a copy of every one of them. 31 net in Mr. Epstein's home, and could be en '2 MS. RCCKENBACK: Okay, so Jansen's 12 issue of credibility and coo be supported + +7 gat together and look at articles. There to be an exception taken to -- strike + +•0 connection with Mr. Jansen's report. You to they recall what, if anything, maybe in o- + +', report. So then this exhibit goes to 33 by way of the video. + +:r, Mr. Jansen, which I have a motion to strike 14 Again, I will to t up that '4 and preclude that is in draft form that I 35 becomes an issue later :6 was working on last night. So I think then, 24 The proper les, rs ate and plane .7 perhaps, the Court can take that up in the 17 of Mr. EpSt . ain Id be taken up a context of Mr. Jansen's testimony and that is later, if it bee s an issue. '9 notion in that, Mr. Jansen is a damages It Pro c se affidavits prepared 70 expert that has testified about defamatory 20 a. Jeffrey Epstein and + +statements. 21 nq I made earlier regarding + +:2 What I started to say is, I would agree 22 r,. Cause. If the affidavit was si to some newspaper articles that try client 2 pr ared against Epstein himself, then it's 24 relied on in bringing the original 4 \*levant, unless it relates to any issues of '5 proceeding, because he has testified that he Mr. knowledge and his diligence. + +eS 10," 196 • relied on these newspaper article I and the like, relating to his preparation of + +7 connected Mr. to Mr. It P his cases. 4 basis for his probable t r nate evidencing Epstein's donation to law 4 the proceeding. enforcement. + +1 Ponsi scheme and that fo in rt, e Forty-five. Documents relating to or + +6 But as to the noun newspaper XS. ROCKEHOACH: Irrelevant and 7 articles or per cats or Internet hits prejudicial, because then it reflects 9 attache t his r rt that I'm now hearing il can be purchased, and that'S just o are hi 40 -- we would absolutely object 20 inappropriate. It's not appropriate for • • , use ey are not relevant in the 11 malicious prosecution action whatnever. t2 lici0 prosecution action. 32 THE COURT: Well, the likelihood. + +a that Dr. Jensen d -- and I guess are s poorly. It's an insinuation that our Syn.,' + +• 3 SCAROIA: If we're going to take up 13 again. I am going to sustain the objection. :5 haven't seen yet, may I suggest that we take 15 have something reasonably to do with this. + +Jansen In response to a motion that we 24 unless I find that -- something that mighr. '6 up Mr. Jansen in response to a motion -- 24 1 understand the intent. But again, any + +-7 THE COURT: At this point, to try to 27 probative value would be materially :a marshal the number of articles, online 28 outweighed by the prejudice and the '7 articles, newspaper articles and 29 relevance. 20 publications related to Jeffrey Epstein is 20 Forty-six. Victim notification lett,. 71 close to impossible, so I'm not going to get 21 from the C.S. Attorney's Office to victi- + +,2 into that right now. 22 Again, I think that more closely aligns 73 Report and analysis of Epstein's 23 itself with that victims' rights case that' + +'I assets, again, likely goes to the punitive 24 being brought. + +25 damages aspect. I'm not going to get into 25 Again, I will sustain until such time + +as I find It may have something to do with 2 the issues I described earlier. 3 Mr. Dennison's -- Dr. L. Dennison report of victim. That's an expert? I don't know what that Se. MS. R0CKENIIACH: Ask Mr. Scarola. 7 Psychological examination of gig'. L.P. 8 This is something that was in the federa: 9 court action. 10 THE COURT: That was the same lady tried to protect by not using her last name. 17 MS. ROCKENSACH: I apologize, Your 13 Honor, and agree to strike that. 14 THE COURT: It's stricken. It will IS R., middle initial L. It may have IC been a two-part name. Just identify her as IT III'. L.A. That would be the designation we is use. MS. ROCKCNSACH: I fail to see the 28 relevance of a psychological report. 2i THE COURT: Same ruling. Again, it 22 doesn't have anything to do with the three 23 ladies involved here. 24 Palm Beach Pollee Department incident 25 report. Does that have anything to do with + +any of the three people here? 7 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. 3 question, Your Honor? 4 THE COURT: Yes. S MR. SCAROLA: oats. 6 Again, I don't intend t it until 7 time as I have lished Its relevance. THE COURT: gument. And at ti's 9 Point - That will be sustained, '8 URI. ise necessary. ti HACH: I don't have copies 12 13 COURT: Same thing with 49. Same no with 50. Same ruling with regard to 15 lb IT Is I9 23 ti 22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROIA: I would only point out - when Your Honor is saying the same ruling, I'm sorry but I'm really not -- THE COURT: Sustained, unless there's some reason for it to be provided as it relates to the three plaintiffs that Hr. represented, or it has to do with issues concerning his preparation, his evaluation of the cases, and all of the rest of those things that I have already + +1 2 indicated. And that it would not be necessarily the contents of the exhibit, but the ability to speak generically about the tact that he had those exhibits on hand when he did what he did. MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. THE COURT: Thanks. Same thing with 52, same ruling. Who is Alberto Pinto? What does he have to do with this? MS. ROCHENHACH: This is a contractor who my client hired to do a There is no relevance. We provided it to the IS THE COURT: Myth' , Mr. Searola, on 14 this? it MA. II Honor. 10 THE 20 21 22 2 sing prole',. the letter. position, Your me ruling finding it to leant, unless otherwise shown to the relate to issues pertaining to the Court has indicated Or Others may Come up later on down the line. ' m preliminarily going to sustain the objection. + +11 12 t3 14 IS 16 17 II 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rank statements, tax returns have to do with the punitive aspects. I will defer on those. MC2 email.. MC2 is another person who has sued Mr. Epstein? ROCKEHHACH: I do not know that exhibit. MC2 was the investing eOapeny that was defrauded by Mr. ROthetein. THE COURT: 7 can't keep fleck -- MS. ROCKEHRACH: No. That's not bleii 7 got that wrong. 3 430e't have these email,. I don't. THE COURT: Can anybody answer who MC2 may be? MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. THE COURT: Me will have to take a look at those at a different time. At this point I will reserve. IND of plea and colloquy. Me talked about that earlier. Sustained, unless It becomes an issue we need to deal with late! on. Preliminarily it's sustained. Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6/30/08. Same ruling. Massage table. Again, unless it + +becomes an issue as to one of these peoplv 2 indicating that -- strike that. + +Somebody that may indicate that massage was done, someone denying the massage table ever existed, I don't think it's relevant. + +Again, it may come up as to massages a being done and that type of thing, but thn 9 actual table is a good exemplar of going mo beyond, over the top of what we need to do here, that is, to bring the actual table. 12 It', not like those instance, where a 3 vehicle iS actually brought into a 1 courtroom, or part of a vehicle is brought is in for the jury to use the vehicle outside 16 the courthouse. The vehicle is the actual -- + +N MR. SCAROLA: I don't anticipate I2 bringing a massage table in, air. + +2.? THE COURT: All right. :hat's good to 21 know. Thank you. + +22 No contact orders entered against 23 Epstein, criminal score sheet regarding '4 Epstein, documents evidencing Epstein's Community control and probation, Epstein's + +2 3 MR. SCAROLA: May we stop e THE COURT: Yes. + +4 Your Honor, was about to rub rough + +sex-offender registrations. + +6 8 THE COURT: Sixty 62 is sustained for t aeons that I've already earlier Indicate 0 record. + +:2 YOS, es pert of In's sex offender registration. + +:3 arty in the state of Hew York -- I'm sure the extent to which it applies + +:6 elsewhere -- he was obliged to disclose his ownership Interest in vehicles, airplanes + +:8 and residences, that is, he had to list all of those things. And one of the ways that + +:9 20 we have identified Jeffrey Epstein's assets + +71 is through those sex offender registration disclosures that he was obliged make and did + +72 73 make. So it has to do with punitive damages + +75 in addition, perhaps, to something else. But it has to do with punitive damages in + +Sixty-three. stein's sex offender rest + +10 THE COURT: What's its relevancy? + +22 12 MR. SCAROLA: I'm not sure Nr. Epstein is going to be hare. + +23 24 THE COURT: Are you to subpoena him? + +Is 14 17 Mx. SCARO'A w So. 110. If he chooses not to ye videotaped deposition + +18 ?RR 's fine. + +It 20 21 MA. I want to be able to as the person who got + +22 2 COURT: it could be duplicative of 000. + +2 YRS COURT: I will defer. + +10 the objection for reasons that were + +11 indicated earlier. + +12 Mat of Bpsteln'S house Contact,. You + +33 have that one? + +II Ms. ROCKEIMACH: I de. May I approach, + +15 Your Honor? + +24 THE COURT: Sure. + +27 MS. ROCKEHBACH: It's a document titled + +28 + +39 May I retrieve these? + +20 THE COURT: This looks like his + +21 vehicles, grocery stores that he shops at. + +22 health and beauty, utilities, storage, mail + +23 and delivery services. maintenance, travel, + +24 banking, bicycles, bookstore, cleaning + +23 service. Entertainment: Breakers, comedy + +particular. + +THE COURT: I will take a look at that when the time coxes, if it coxes at all. Thank you. + +Booking photographs. Again, same ruling as I made on the other matters regarding the criminal aspects of the ease. + +MR. SCAROLA: This would simply be a photograph, Your Honor. + +ME. SCAROM: it may be. Again, I just want to explain to Your Honor that's why + +ft's listed. + +CAD calls. C-A-D. + +MM. SCAROLA: I can't tell you. + +SHE COURT: Sustained. + +MS. ROCKEHBACH: I have a copy of the + +exhibit that Mr. Scarola provided. They are Palm Beach Police Department -- + +THE COURT: i have already sustained + +Vehicles, Mail Deliveries -- + +2 3 4 corner, Mar-a-Lago. It goes to different servicing companies, such as extermination type of thing. It has a list of names and numbers. + +i Okay, again the same ruling that I made 6 7 8 9 earlier, and that is, that it would not be relevant, except for issues that I have discussed earlier that may impact upon particularly Mr. diligence, what he '0 had, particularly at the time of his employ 10 is facing very substantial jeopardy. And + +1 Investigating office, through its chief. is challenging the way in which his cases are being treated is relevant and material with regard to his taking the highly unusual step of filing a baseless malicious claim against , that is, Mr. Epstein filing that claim against + +THE COURT: I'm sorry. MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Epstein knows that he '1 with the Rothatein firm, and those things I 21 that letter is corroborative of that. It': '2 have already mentioned in the record. 12 part of what he knows when Iles the + +') Documents related to Epstein's 13 claim. + +:4 investments would be a punitive damage issue 34 THE COURT: She ion sustained. '5 that we will take up et a later time. 13 MS. ROCKENBACH: next set of item: '9 presume. 19 Lonna Bel ve from the Office of the :0 XS. ROCKENBACH: That's correct. it's 20 tOrney. They are all different, but dated May ist, 2006. 21 relate to -- for instance, Exhibit necessary, for the punitive damages was going to be giving a statement to the + +\*6 Letter from Chief Reiter from the Palm 3.1 70 through 74, a letters from 'I Beach Police Department to Barry Krischer, 39 Mr. Boatel y Tronstin, prior 8 it should be, instead of Krisehler, T as counsel, o the tent State Attorney + +:2 THE COURT: Let me take a look at it. 22 . 0 is a disclosure of third-party :3 Sixty-nine is a list of planes owned by 2 at rney fee payment where my client had :4 Epstein. That would be, again. reserved, if 4 Stored to PaY for his house manager, who :5 + +? c iSir + +• component of the ease. I assistant state attorney. And it vas in actually is -- but it has no relevance. 'That's the point. It actually is a good thing. but here it shouldn't come in, because we are just getting too far astrmy. + +2 Did you see these letters 2 compliance with ethical rules. It 3 2 5 6 I MR. SCAROLA: It's bee 1 t THE COURT: I cool I n hat relevancy it would haw to do i this. Unless you can provide additional information, it °stained. ) attorne b t one '2 i them. + +I have these documents and these 8 Tronstin. one of Mr. Epstein's 2 401604\$ if Your Honor would like to 100k at + +0 . KENBACH: See, Your Honor. 20 MR. SCAROLA: Part of what all the :2 4, are all letters from -- 12 Epstein were dealing with, including Brad + +all ON -- Exhibits 70, 71. 11 attorneys prosecuting claims against e 3 SCAROTA: I'm sorry. I'm having 23 S was the degree of control that ficulty doing two things at once. I'm 24 Mr. Epstein was exercising over various :5 reading this letter. I would like -- I 15 witnesses. And those letters evidence the - 7 Police Department was the principle 27 exercising over various witnesses who wore '9 claims. And obviously, the chief's position 29 investigation. That is why such things sr 2: the quality of the claims that was called 21 subpoenaing of flight logs and the necessity 22 Mr. Epstein. 23 under Mr. Epstein's influence to give sworn + +:6 would like to comment that the Palm Reach 24 degree of control that Jeffrey Epstein w)- :8 investigating agency with regard to these 18 part of the then ongoing criminal 20 with regard to these claims is reflective of 20 the depositions of pilots and the 22 Into question in the complaint by 22 to try to find third parties who were not 24 So to the extent that Mr. Epstein is 24 testimony concerning what was going on on 25 aware of the fact that the chief 75 airplanes became necessary. + +2 3 4 be relevant if we were trying Mr. cases tiltwere settled. They are not remotely relevant in this action. + +I have made earlier with regard to other matters concerning the criminal file. + +MS. ROCKRIMACR: Thank you. + +THE COURT: The documents related to the rental of vehicles for Who is she? + +\$ 6 TM COURT: I tend to agree. Again, for the same reasons that I ruled earlier, I 7 sustain the objection to these letters from MS. ROCKKUBACH: I don't know that -- 9 the amine:Int State Attorney. rental -- and I don't even see rental + +8 this attorneys -- Mr. Kiastein's attorneys to would have to have Mr. Scarola explain why '0 Mr. Goldberger's letters, 75. Is agreements. I would expect to see a rental + +:1 I approach, Your 11 car: Alamo, Hertz or something. This + +'2 Honor? It is dated June 22nd. 12 document that was produced i codex labels, 3 THE COURT: Off the record. 13 priority overnight redEx to my client + +:4 Ili discussion was held off the record.) 24 at his Palm Beach re s ith + +'5 THE COURT: I made an error confusing 15 handwritten note and I ays, 'Contract up + +\*6 Mr. Salnick with Mr. Kriseher. I apologia\* iii on February 2n• " T i as a handwritten '3 to them both. So I will need to take a look 17 note Dollar n Car No relevance. 4 at that letter from Chief Reiter again and 30 TM RT: •On't know who this is. :0 regard. 20 a re? + +'9 see if it changes my thought process in that It DO av any ides who we are talking + +:2 M. KCCIIIIKBACK: Your Honor, I have it, if you want t0 take another l0ok. It '3 encloses a probable cause affidavit and Case 2 Ted Shed. :4 filing, packages from the police 4 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. '5 department -- Palm Beach Pollee Department 78K COURT: Same ruling. + +21 SCAROLA: Same argument. + +22 COURT: Same ruling. + +• from the chief of police. I Documents related to the property + +2 THE COURT: Sure. Sorry 2 searches of Jeffrey Epstein's property. + +2 I'm going to take the it as MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. 4 to number 66, so it's s r he THE COURT: Sam ruling. 5 reasons I have earlier :idlest Arrest warrant of I l? + +6 Number 75, the let MR. SCARO4A: Same argument. 7 Mr. Goldberger r. Krischer. Wig COURT: Sam ruling. + +li 00 you want c nt Mr. Searola? 4 Police report regarding + +9 we ROM: . TOUr Honor. Same il picking up money, dated 11/28/04. + +'0 erg nt. 20 MR. MARTA: Same argument. + +CO4 : Same ruling. I'm going to 21 THE COURT: Same ruling. These are all + +•2 Stain •t. AIM, it Carries with it the 12 Sustained, Unless Shown to the Court later + +3 al of Mr. Goldberger having to be a 13 that there's a particular relevance to any :5 even tangentially related to the three cases 15 I have indicated. :6 that we have. 16 Righty -two. List of Trilateral + +ness. I just don't see it as necessarily 24 of these documents. That's the same ruling + +-7 I don't know if one of these young 17 Commission Members of 2003. Do you know :0 women were part of this. The one who is 16 what that is? :9 described here is not listed, even by 19 MS. ROCKKUBACH: I still don't, even 20 initials, so I will take the ease position I 20 after looking at the document. But it is on + +2: have taken earlier. 21 a website Bible Believers.org, a nine-page + +22 M. KOCKICNBACII: Your Honor, number 76, 22 document with individual names of people. + +23 I'm not sure if you need the packet, but 23 VISCOUS!: It's refreshing the Bible + +24 it's subpoenas that were issued. 24 is being mentioned during all of this. + +25 THE COURT: No. It's the same ruling I 23 MR. MAROLA: Same argument. + +I 2 3 : THE COURT: Same ruling. Alan Dershowite's letter dated April 19th, '06, and statute 90.410. t guess this has to do with similar activity. 5 Same argument? 5 ruling. + +2 I number 88 Is Hyperion Air passenger manifest. Same ruling. Same thing with the flight information. + +4 Eighty-nine. Passenger list. 90, sane + +6 MR. SCAROLA: This is slightly Notepad/notes, Maria. 7 different, Your Honor. This has to do with MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. 6 the allegation that there was a significant y THE COURT: Same ruling. 9 change in the approach to prosecution of 4 Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 vs. US .3 these fter Brad was employed O. case. II 17 at RAA. And one of the elements that is cited to is that he begins to take discovery 2 I) with regard to other victims. 1 THE COURT: That wl V be + +MR. SCAROLA: That's the CVRA case, Your Honor. + +14 In fact, there were multiple activities 4 discussed -- obviousl will if that occurred prior to brad's employment IS discussed. Row much o pleadings that .7 of matters relating to other victims. And IT Court's con ton -ter. Is the federal statute requires that a notice is Epst in Fir ndment speech. 19 be given to the other side of the intent to 19 MR. Those are just a 28 rely upon evidence with regard to other 20 r e to deposition excerpts. + +id with ARA that were directed at the discovery 14 need to be addr seed I1 a matter of the + +2i victims. 21 COURT: Reiter letter to ErleCter. + +22 THE COURT: Did you take 22 Ilia (ready been talked about. That's 1 23 Mr. Dershowitz's deposition as it relates tO 2\ d leatiOn, Unless he wrote another one. 24 this Case? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. But I have had + +I think it's a duplication. You can check. + +I the pleasure of deposing Kr. De a 1 M. SCAROLA: Sixty-eight isn't dated. 7 THE COURT: Not as it rem es 7 This one is dated. I don't know whether 3 case? they're two different letters or the same + +4 MR. SCAROLA: No. one, Your Honor. 6 of the letter, Your Hon was not In not produced to me. + +S MS. ROCKENBACH: do not h e a Copy MS. ROCXENHACH: Ninety-four. Rya. + +2 production. THE COURT: I'm going to assume that + +1 THE COURT: I defer on that ore 2 it's the same unless it's produced 9 Fr s In let . Again, goes with the 0 separately. And it will be ordered to be I3 same ro lions that I earlier indicated. tO produced separately within 15 days, if not II ust . It already done. + +.2 Oin's account information. 12 Just like anything else, I'm Ordering .3 -. ROCIOBIRACH: I don't know what that 13 it be produced -- that I may have ordered in ns. It was not produced. 14 the past -- within a 15-day period. + +.5 THE COURT: It will have to be produced 15 Ninety-six. imi police + +.5 in the meantime. 16 report. Same ruling, same position taken by + +IT MR. SCAROLA: Yes. I hope it will be. 17 Mr. counsel. + +Is It Is listed, although it has not yet been II Victim's -- individual -- says + +.9 produced by Mr. Epstein in anticipation of Is victim's -- not plural -- school records and 23 his being ordered to produce it. 20 transcripts. I don't know which victim yi THE COURT: Eighty-six. Epstein's 21 you're talking about. Maybe it's the young 22 criminal close-out sheet will, again, be 22 lady who was the model student, as discussed 2) sustained for reasons earlier stated on the 23 earlier, allegedly prior to Mr. Epstein's + +Ti record. 24 involvement. + +THE COURT: She's not one of the people 2 involved here today. XS. RocKKKBACR: That's correct. 4 TBR COURT: 1 will sustain it. MS. ROCM631RACH: Your Honor, if I way. 6 I think I haven sampling of this \*shit:- 7 All the pages I have in front of me say Shane R. 9 THE COURT: Ninety-seven would be the same ruling. Ninety-eight, the same ruling. :2 Ninety-nine, the same ruling. 11 One hundred. All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Spotein's '3 home. Same ruling. :6 One hundred one. trails received by Palm beach Records related to Jeffrey :8 Epstein. '9 Who Is Pals Beach records? :0 XS. ROCKKNHACK: T don't know, and 7 don't have the exhibit. It was not :2 PrOdUtOd. :3 THE COURT: Again, to be Produced. 74 this titre sustained. Same ruling. '5 One hundred and two. All items listed At + +3 6 :2 :3 :6 :8 :9 20 71 72 'I 25 on the Palm Beach Police Deportee rty report lists. Same ruling. One hundred and three. of convictions related to In. I ve already ruled on that, c lass obally that, until further in done and further inform\* le received regarding the pleas arW to ey apply, 1 am not in a pojaClon to • definitive ruling on that. huijled and six -- strike that. hundred and four is Jeffrey criminal records. That mirrors of the things I've indicated. It would be sustained pending further inquiry or review based upon reasons stated already by the Court. One hundred and five. All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey, R-K-C-A-R-R-Y. Again, same ruling. I'm just going to ignore 106. it's a catch-all I usually don't rule on any way. One hundred and thirteen. All + +Pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims' Rights Act prosecuted by on behalf of victinof Kpstein's criminal molestation. As 1 have done earlier, to be consistent, t sustain the objection Decoy. of it's breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice, to specific documents being provided within 15 days to the 10 attorneys for Epstein. 21 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. We are 12 talking about 1132 23 THE COURT: Yee. 34 MR. SCAROLA: Th those. 15 Your Honor. Mr. Pate entered an 34 appearance in was permitted to 27 t hay got all of those 28 pleadings • also -- It THE hat's fine. But I could 20 5. that in -- I think somebody 21 eight or nine years' litigation -- 22 Mr. di/pollen pointed out earlier, not Y one of those documents are going to be •4 010vant here. KO whatever the plaintiff is Peeking to introduc, as a result of that + +2 10 31 12 23 24 15 It 27 28 39 20 21 22 23 24 23 should be culled and should be provided to the other side. MR. SCAROLA: And sy response to that is, as 1 stand here right now, I don't know. 7 am listing it because it is potentially relevant. There's obviously been a lot of diaCuSeiOn to the Crime Victims' Rights ACt Case. And if Your Honor yenta me CO duplicate everything been filed in that Case -- THE COURT: That's not what Suggesting, Mr. Scarola. What I'm sayIng := the problem that I have and how I usually rule on those setters is that when a file is identified as all pleadings and attachments. particularly whereas here, your client is an attorney who is the lead attorney in the prosecution of the CVRA claims, then he should be aware of what would be relevant as it relates to his malicious prosecution claim against Epstein. Hot all of those documents will be relevant. I wouldn't expect a defendant in a malicious prosecution claim, Epstein, to have to review the -- attorneys in + +particular -- having to review all the MR. SCAROLA: Yes. sir. to light or 2 documents and guessing which ones may or n, the Court's ruling -- and I don't mean to be 5 the issue that I'm dealing with. take 113, and I would have a separate 7 provided to them -- 15 days maybe a little would produce every pleading on PACER. And 9 going to give you -- 1/13, 30 days. something that Your Honor believes that I + +3 not be introduced or sought to be introduced arguing after the ruling. I only want to 4 or considered to be introduced. So thy— understand it. What I would do is I would + +6 They must be culled and they must be listing of every pleading on PACER, and I a short in light of the holiday season, so I'm I don't want to do that if I'm doing + +'0 MS. ROCKPARACH: Shank you, Your Honor. lo ought not to be doing. + +'1 MR. SCAROLA: May I simply state that 31 SHE COURT: The reason why I say that '2 knowing what Mr. Epstein is going to attempt 11 that's involved here. II o, clearly '5 every pleading in the Crime Victims' Rights IS of medical records, wh er we're dealing 6 Act ease is potentially relevant? And every 36 with a set of p ychi Ic ecords, I one of those pleadings is available on 17 admissions -ital admissions to s PACER. And he is a party to the litigation. ts psychiatr C facil t es, rehabilitation 9 So to Comply with the Court's order ..., I It facilitie - I eve seen thousands of '4 in that case that is on PACER so that I have 4 believe to be relevant. 25 the flexibility to introduce whatever I Mal, There are a number of documents that + +'2 at this stage in this litigation, not 12 is, number one, we already h enough paper 6 to say with regard to the defense, that 14 in my view, whether w alin with a set 20 don't want co do something that Your Honor 20 a. rule done in camera inspections is telling me I ought not to do. hut to Si nda of documents. I have culled 22 comply with the order as you have described 22 fr. m -- probably often out of thousand, :.1 it, I would simply duplicate every pleading 2 of ocumenta -- 30, 40. 50, 70 pages of what + +XV;;;SY 224 2 THE COURT: That's why my ug a 2 individual per day that has no relevancy at s It would be the s thin f you were think of right off the top of any head. But + +• need to. I deal with food that was eaten by a given I it would be -- that the obj io all whatsoever with the treatment. 4 sustained as the exhibi ph 1 There are other things that I can't 6 to stand here today •• re in while they have to be documented by the I trial -- and sa re are the 3.000 docket hospital, they have to be documented by T., 2 entries to the C ctims' Rights Act 7 rehab facility, they are not nee SSSSS ily 9 case, a want lull,to review all ii relevant to the inquiry at issue and can l 0 3,00 t entries, which comprise 7,000 30 culled out. 2 No, the Jury is not going to go 12 being the lead attorney on that case. 3 th all of those without exactly knowing 13 despite Mr. Epstein being an intervener a- + +1d say. No. it is not specific 11 Whit I'm fay" is. with your client t they are looking for. 14 some nature in that case. it's still I And so as phrased, the objection is 15 incumbent upon the party offering the 7 I have given you the opportunity to 17 compilation. And that is what I'm requiring + +:6 sustained. 26 exhibits to present the most narrow :s otherwise remedy the situation. Rut if 18 you to do. :9 that's the response that I'm getting -- and 39 I gave you and your client 30 days to '2 One hundred fourteen -- 22 entirety, because the likelihood of me + +20 I respect that -- then that's the ruling of 20 cull those documents that In good faith are 21 the Court. 21 going to be sought and be admitted, not the 73 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. Again, I 23 admitting all of the docket entries over an + +74 would, in light of Your Honor's comments -- 24 eight-year period or nine-year period -- 25 THE COURT: It was actually a ruling. 23 whatever it might -- for highly unlikely + +because of jury confusion, because of time 2 and consideration of the jury's time when it 3 comes to that. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: And I would never offer it all. + +6 THE COURT: So that's exactly what I'm 7 trying to say. The 30-day lead time that I 8 am giving is in consideration of the amount 9 of documentation that would have to be reviewed, and that since Mr. would 1 likely be in the beet position to be able to '2 cull out those documents that would '2 reasonably be calculated to be introduced • into evidence. + +'1 So that's the order of the Court. If 6 you take me up on it, that's fine. If you 7 don't, then, again, I an sustaining the • objection as phrased in number 113. So 9 that's with the caveat Chet I have described 30 and offered CO you. + +Y.R. VITALE: Your Honor, with regard to :2 101, you had given us 15 days to produce. :3 WOuld that also be extended to 30 cleys, :4 given the holiday? + +25 THE COURT: NO. because, again. + +everything, other than what I come up with. I think you already a 0 produced It. And if it has , n that should be 15 days. + +The Crime Victims lengthier and Comprises of litigation. ff much or eight years exhibit list was compiled and lien t 9 November, which is abou tree or Ur day. Short - bust Ae s short of a month. SO they ho have been produced, bUt hive :2 those things that Ms. Rockenbach Is :2 ng haven't been that would be 15 . other than number 113. + +Number 114. motion for :6 Summary Judgment. The Court would like to 7 take judicial notice. + +:8 XS. RocKENHACH, I don't know that it'. an exhibit for the jury to consider. This 20 might go to -- I think -- I'm guessing -- it 2: was going to go to a legal argument before 72 Your Honor as to whether there was a bona 22 fide termination when my client dismissed 74 the original proceeding that he brought 25 against Mr. + +THE COWRY: Perhaps. If it's an issue of fact, then it will be overruled. + +Mr. Scarola. you want to get heard? MR. SCARO:A: That's exactly what I was going to say, Your Honor. + +If they are contending that there's an issue of fact as to whether there was a bona fide termination, then the circumstance under which the voluntary dismissal was 10 taken is obviously relevant and material. 31 What it was that was Jeffrey Epstein 12 declined to defend against ls4elevant and 23 material. + +34 THE COURT: It i rule + +15 One hundred and een is tire re00tir 14 and hourly bill nq a 'scion produced in 1, discovery. + +Is t and that rds' claim of lost time thing? + +a. COWRY: Well, that may Come in ae rages to the malicious prosecution + +SCAROLA: Yee, Your Honor. + +Rave you received any of that yet? + +MS. ROCKENRACH: T have a circle hero, + +meaning that it was not produced in the context and pursuant to the Court's order. + +THE COURT: You might want to get with Mr. Vitale and see if you can -- + +MR. SCAROLA: It was produced prior to Mr. itPet0121.6 deposition. In response to a request for production, all or thOSO time records have been produced. + +MR COURT: Again, as I said with regard to 113, the documents have to be Culled to some degree so that it can be given to the other side as the exhibit that's being sought to be introduced at trial. + +At this time it may still be going on, so it may not be completed up to the time of the trial. Just like medical records, sometimes if there's ongoing treatment, even though somebody is at maximum medical improvement but they are still treating, there could still be a continuing type of exhibit. + +MR. SCAROLA: These are time records of Mr. time devoted to the defense c' the maliciously filed claim. Once that + +claim was dismissed, he was no longer 1 at a special-set hearing. So 1 would 2 devoting time to the defense of the elate. suggest that we set something in the near + +3 Those records have all been produced. future for a half-hour hearing so that we 4 They have been specifically identified. He can deal with those issues independently. 5 has segregated out time spent in defense of think it's worth some tire to be taken. 7 that exhibit. and produced to the FBI by Rodriguez. + +6 the case from anything else, and they have Phone journal taken from Epstedn's home a But if they need it to be re-produced That's the houseman. Same ruling as I zed- + +9 to them again, and Your Honor directs that earlier with regard to that. '1 reproduce it again. 21 and Prince Andrew. + +'0 we need to re-produce it again, we will 10 Photograph depicting S Maxwel' + +'2 THE COOKY: Again, I'm not directing 22 MS. 1:CCM:HACH: No red nee to till- "; another reproduction. Perhaps, as I said, 33 action. It's prejudicia '3 Hs. Rockenbach and it can be taken care of 15 MR. SCAROLA: Yes r. Same argument. :6 without further judicial intervention. 1 am 26 TIE COURT unless further + +\*4 Hr. Vitale can handle that issue with 34 TIM COURT: Saxe nt, . Sterol.? + +'7 sure it can. 2/ informatio v • bring to the Court + +AI Next is all claims filed by EPStein in 34 Otherwis :0 would have to see those when the time comes. 20 Same ruling. + +'7 the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. 1 19 All ht Ode. We talked about those + +All submissions by Epstein in 21 nce of contributions t0 the P41'. + +:2 Connection with the Rothstein deposition. 22 BO& lice Department. Sustained. Sam. :3 Again, I will see those when the time COmee. 2 ru ng. 'S All settlement agreements between that. the source of information regarding + +:4 if necessary. 7 will defer on those two. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. sir. I did speak of + +S HCASSr' • Epstein and victims of sexual met one. 1 his assets. 7 Again, I would have to see the w + +2 TIM COURT: And I think 1 deferred on 3 time comes. 1 am most into to t A that. If 1 didn't, that's the way I'm going 4 three individuals at is 1 to deal with it. + +, 6 MR. SCAROLA: You Honor. t ere have been objections that has raised to the Is of a Contractual f ntiality provision. 4 25, 2011. + +One hundred and thirty-two, New York Post article: billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: 7 production of t document\* On the basis I'm a sex offender, not a predator. February + +3 If allege on remains that these il SR. SCAROLA: These are direct quote\* -2 •S at least discoverable with regard 12 children as the equivalent of stealing a 1 to rag a determination as to whether the 23 bagel. + +-0 case -- a three at issue -- were somehow 20 from Mr. Epstein. It's the article in which , n the value of the claims in 21 he compare. the abuse inflicted upon + +ims were ginned up. 24 THE COURT: Cnsworn statement out of + +:5 And again, the degree of financial 25 court being used to prove the truth of the '6 exposure that Xr. /\*stein was facing Is 26 ratter asserted? -7 reflected by the settlements of all of the 27 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. Being used to :a claims that he ultimately settled after the la prove the fact that the statement was mad-, - 3 filing of this maliciously -- allegedly 29 being used to prove the state of the + +70 maliciously prosecuted lawsuit. 20 speaker's rind, and being used for purpot, + +7: So we will be asking the Court to 21 of the jury's f punitive 77 compel production of all of those settlement 22 damages. 73 agreements. 23 We don't contend that molesting + +74 THE COURT: That's something that 24 children is the equivalent of stealing a 75 probably will need to be dealt with probably 23 bagel. + +2 2 a If we were introducing this statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted. we would be advocating that molesting a child is the equivalent of stealing a bagel. 1 Mr. Kpat.in doe' show up for trial, one of the very first questions I'm going to ask him Is, Did you wake this statement to thr New York newspaper? + +5 INK COURT: No. I's not sure that's TIM COURT: Like I said, we will tak-6 the way that the hearsay rule is that up when time comes. Me can further + +2 implemented. discuss the objections at the same time we + +'0 1Is. Rockanbach, your position? are going to he discussing the -- all 9 115. ROCKKNINICII: Thank you. We did settlement agreements, 119. All right. • raised probative value substantially 11 TIIK COURT: Thanks a lot to our court '2 outweighed by the danger or unfair 12 reporter for staying and wor 9 through '3 prejudice, confusion. misleading the jury, 23 this. as we have, today. + +'o raise h . We raised relevance. We 10 MS. ROCKKHBACK: Thank you, Your Honor. + +:4 as well as hearsay and authenticity. 24 MR. SCAROLA: I that are + +'5 This is a very good example of an 25 going to deal with ki ndsent issue/ :6 inflamsatory exhibit by Mr. I , and it 1.1 the first issue r onvene? '' seeks to try to prove. 1 guess, that my 2/ iiel thought we talk\*\*, 9 client is a bad person or bad character as about th e alre '3 evidence under 90.404. This is hearsay end It MA. ' No, no. You remember 70 it should not be admitted. It would be 20 t• dentifled every question and answer? + +Inflammatory and very prejudicial to my 21 COURT.: You are talking about the :2 client. 22 Ind 01 questions and answers. Yes, Sir. 2\ And we will take those up 4 fret. and thenowefwillrgoetoithoomotions,to Compel and n or ve rder. + +:1 THE COCK,: Any request for admissions 74 sent out in response to that article? + +'6 MR. SCAROLA: There may have been. + +4Itk i, Sir 236 7 concerning whether Mr. WI/stein 2 Remember on Thursday, we're pretty much 1 statements to any third par re any going to limit us to the morning. So we are 6 So we would have the be f an adverse arguments accordingly, if you would, please. ' Inference in th ard. I ale going to give you these materials + +• There certainly were deposition ns 1 we have the time, okay? a of his molestation clai , nd erted going to from 10 to 12, 12:30, then that i the fifth Amendment wi raper o those. will be it. Okay. So try and govern your + +8 And the eta n of a party opponent a back. 2 is not rsay tement. f'w. sorry. II Mr. Scarola, as 1 said, I's going to o Ther a exception to the hearsay rule for 10 impose upon you to prepare the orders as T •2 to state of mind. And clearly the 12 this point, since we do have theSe actual '1 is attitude about the offense he 23 questions, that we can really prepare an + +OEM of a party opponent. Rut it 21 have already IndiCated. I'm not sure at tted is highly relevant in a punitive 24 order until we get this done on Thursday as :5 damages claim. 15 to the Fifth Amendment global rulings that 'a of concern to me in this particular context 26 once I have had an opportunity to go through 20 newspaper. 20 that you have done that and gotten them to + +:6 MR COITRY: I recognise the party 16 the Court has already made. And it may - 7 opponent issue. Again, its application is 2/ become more focused and be more specific '9 where the information comes from. a 39 all of these. And I appreciate the fact + +71 So I would have to take a look at it. 21 71 are going to set that other issue about the 23 I'm going to keep some of this material. + +22 Maybe we can set that at the son time we 22 In the meantime what I'm going to do is + +74 other victims' information. 24 MR. LINK: Judge, thank you for your 25 MR. SCAROLA: I can assure you that, if 25 time today. We appreciate your patience for + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and M.. =IN individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +cos + +#### ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENI N4 TEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LIMINE SEZTIOIrRIAL EXHIBITS) + +THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, upon Section B ( TrialExhibit List) of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") (D.E. 1070). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the Response filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. (a) (D.E. 1089), haying heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: + +&#x27; Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine was directed at Amended Exhibit List dated November 9, 2017. D.E. 1043.) On December 7, 2017, after two ays of hearing and substantive Court rulings, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109) identifying 79 new items and modif ing some ohis earlier disclosed exhibits. This Order only addresses the exhibits identified on November 9, 2017, Exhibit List. To the extent any exhibit numbers have been replaced with different i items or new numbers have been added, those will be subject to a separate Order after the appropriate motion and hearing. The rulings set forth herein for all exhibits disclosed on December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List that have not been modified will remain unc range .

I. On or before December 20, 2017 shall produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial with the exception of Exhibit No. 113 which is addressed separately in paragraph 2 below. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219, 226, 228.)

2. On or before January 5, 2018,M shall produce to Epstein the A ssdjfic court filings to be used as trial exhibits from the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedin(ane Does #1 and #2 v. United States of America, U.S. District Court, Southern District o Case No. 08- 80736-Civ-Marra..) designated as Trial Exhibit No l 113 shall not produce each and every item identified on the Court's docket, b't a! cull out the specific items he intends to use at trial. The Court hereby sustains Epstem's objection to Exhibit No. 113 as being overbroad. The Court will revisit this ruling if Edwards narrows the documents he intends to introduce at trial. (12/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14.)

3. As set forth in more detail bekw, the Court has sustained Epstein's objections to a number ofM' trial exhibits. Those objections will be sustained unless there is a showing at trial that the exhibits are relevant and material to the issues to be determined. For example, exhibits may be admissible if they fa three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc), if they relate to issues concern wa s' preparation and evaluation of his clients' cases, or for any other reason enunc t e Court on the record at the November 29, 2017 and December 5, 2017 hcaring9 ttose instances, will be allowed to speak generically about the facts surrounding those exhibits, but will not necessarily be allowed to introduce the exhibits at trial without further Order of the Court. The Court will make decisions on an item-by-item basis at the appropriate time. Any discussions relating to an exhibit to which an objection has been sustained shall be conducted outside the presence of the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24; 198:19-199:5.)

4. As set forth in more detail below, the Court defers rulings on Epstein's objections directed to ' trial exhibits concerning Epstein's net worth and in support of punitive damages claim. The Court will address these objections at the appropriate time. (12/5/17 Tr. 163:17-164:15.)

5. The Court makes the following specific findings:

OS LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS: I —All Objections 2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed dan of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or n .resentation of cumulative evidence 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 9— Other (please identify basis 64tobj ion) 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 10 — Completeness II — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Counsel for Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper exhibit 14 — Trade secrets/Confidential

No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's
1.All applicable criminal statutes3,4, 7, 11, 12Not addressed at hearing
2.All applicable Florida Statutes3,4,7, II, 12Not addressed at hearing
3.Photos an information of Jeffrey Epstein's
homes, flilanes and automobiles
3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1211/29/17 Tr. 160:6-162:15
4.Order confirmation from Amazon.com for3, 4, 7, 811/29/17 Tr. 162:16-167-9
5.Non-Prosecution Agreement3, 4, 7, 8, 1011/29/17 Tr. 167;11-13
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's
6.Jane Doe 102 Complaint3, 4, 7, 13I 1/29/17 Tr. 167:14-170:9
7.Messages taken from message pads found at
3, 4, 7, 8, I I, 1411/29/17 Tr. 171:22-176:9
8.Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by
3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14I I/29/17 Tr. 176:10-187:8
9.Jeffrey Epstein flight logs3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1112/5/17 Tr. 64:8-81:17: 85:11-22
10.Jeffrey Epstein phone records3, 4, 10, lam12/5/17 Tr. 81:18-82:17: 146:14-
II.phone records3,4 8J0,4 7' 1 14
,--, \ 14/
12.Jail Visitation Logs e c, 7, 8, II
13.Jeffrey Epstein's probation file Alcict,„.e.3, 4, 7, 8, 1112/5/17 Tr. 150:4-152:11.
14.All probable cause affidavits hated criminal
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 152:14-153:13
15.Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal
3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24
16.Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's
3, 4, 812/5/17 Tr. 160:25-161:21
17.Application for Search Warrant ofJeffrey
18.Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent

In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Video of Epstein Property Inspection 01/18/10." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
19.All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets1212/5/17 Tr. 162:25-164:15
Deferred
20.Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy)1212/5/17 Tr. 163:4-5; 164:16-19
Sustained
21.Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy)Cannot be read, 3, 1412/5/17 Tr. 164:20-24
Sustained
22.List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 164:25-165:5
Deferred
23.Yearbooks of Jane Doe3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16;
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred
24.2002 Palm Beach High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred
25.2001 Palm Beach High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred
26.2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred
27.Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home33, 4, 7, 8, 10,12/5/17 Tr. 166:15-24
Sustained

3 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29)." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED]' Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
28.Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1412/5/17 Tr. 167:7-168:16
Sustained in part and overruled in part. The impact upon the issues as to preparedness, knowledge, as far as Mr. [REDACTED] is concerned – his diligence as to discovery – if those are called into question, then this exhibit may be discussed. The actual documents themselves are excessive and would be getting into other matters that would not be germane to [REDACTED]' three clients and, therefore, may not be used until discussed outside the presence of the jury
29.The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1312/5/17 Tr. 168:17-175:1
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If [REDACTED] had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, this file may come into play. The sheer amount of the criminal file would also be relevant to Mr. Epstein's state of mind at the time he filed the underlying Complaint. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury.
30.All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 175:2-179:25
Deferred
31.Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 175:2-180:5
Deferred
32.List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13,
The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item.		12/5/17 Tr. 180:23-181:12
Deferred
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
33.All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 188:23-192:17
Deferred
34.All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing
35.Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him3, 4, 11, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 192:18-22
Deferred
36.All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant3, 4, 11, 12, 13.
This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit.		12/5/17 Tr. 192:23-193:2
Deferred
37.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing
38.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB3, 4, 11, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing
39.Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG3, 4, 11, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing
40.Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 193:3-194:22
Deferred
41.Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets3, 4, 7, 8, 1412/5/17 Tr. 194:23-195:1
Deferred
42.Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home.3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 195:2-195:15
Deferred
43.Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes3, 4, 7, 8, 14, 12
(as to cars and boats)		12/5/17 Tr. 195:16-18
Deferred
44.Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED]3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 195:19-196:2
Deferred
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
45.Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 196:3-19
Sustained
46.Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victims43, 4, 7, 8, 1412/5/17 Tr. 196:20-197:2
Sustained
47.Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 1412/5/17 Tr. 197:3-23
Sustained
48.Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/063, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 197:24-198:10
Sustained
49.All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained
50.All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained
51.Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained
52.Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 199:8
Sustained
53.Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 199:9-25
Sustained
54.Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred
55.Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred
56.MC2 emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 200:4-18
Not Produced
Reserved ruling because documents not available
57.DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-083, 4, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 200:19-22
Sustained
58.Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-083, 4, 1312/5/17 Tr. 200:23-24
Sustained
59.Massage Table53, 4, 12 (document marked as No. 59 is not a massage table)12/5/17 Tr. 200:25-201:21
Sustained

4 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(CW & SR) 07/09/2008." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds.

5 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/25/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate.

No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's
60.No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 1312/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
61.Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
62.Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's
3, 4, 7, 812/5/I 7 Tr. 201:22-202:8
63.Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations
3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 202:9-203:4
64.Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph3, 4, 7, 8,
65.CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM
3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 204:3-11
66.List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts3, 4, 7, 8, 12
67.Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's ,\"1,
7; 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 205:13-15
68.Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Ba slie
Krischler L
3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr, 205:16-22; 206:2-
69.List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein,
70.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 207;15-209:9
71.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
72.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
73.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9

6 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List,illichanged the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report ate 9/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems' appropriate.

No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's
74.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State
3, 4, 7, 8, I012/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
75.Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-063, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 209:10-12: 210:6-21
76.All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury
/4
„c )
77.Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for —
( c s.
78.Ted's Sheds Documents3, 4, 7, 8,
79.Documents related to Moray searches ofJeffrey
3, 4, 7, 8, 1412/5/17 Tr. 212:1-4
80.Arrest Warrant of3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 212:5-7
81.Police report regarding picking up
3, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 212:8-15
82.List of Trilateral Commission Members of 20033, 4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 212:16-213:1
83.Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute
3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 213:2-214:8
84.Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-063,4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 214:9-11
85.Jeffrey Epstein Account Information3, 4, 7, 8, I2, 1412/5/17 Tr. 214:12-20
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's
86.Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 214:21-24
87.JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest3, 4, 7, 8, 10, II12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
88.Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1 112/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
89.Flight information for3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1112/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
90.Passenger List Palm Beach flights 20053, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1112/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
91.Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.re Maria3, 4, 7, 8, JO, 1212/5/17 Tr. 215:6-8
92.Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case3, 4, 12 (document
what is iof
93.Jeffrey Epstein 51h Amendment Speech
? Se
3, 4,4 „)
94.Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-063,4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 215:21-216:14
95.Police Repo dated-28-04 3,4, 7, 8, 1012/5/17 Tr. 216:15-17
96.Victim's school records and transcripts3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 216:18-217:8
97.Victim Notification letter73, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 217:9-10
98.Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey
3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 217:11
99.Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee
3, 4, 6, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 217:12
3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 217:13-15
3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 217:16-24

In his December 7, 2017, Second x • List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "to 09/03/08." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, t us, t ie Court's ruling holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
102.All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists83, 4, 7, 8, 12
(items not provided)		12/5/17 Tr. 217:25-218:2
Sustained
103.All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 218:3-10
Sustained
104.Jeffrey Epstein criminal records3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 218:12-17
Sustained
105.All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11,12/5/17 Tr. 218:18-22
Sustained
106.Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 218:22-23
No ruling; catch all
107.Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
108.Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
109.██████████ reserves all objections to Epstein's ExhibitsNot an exhibitNot an exhibit
110.██████████ reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit ListNot an exhibitNot an exhibit
111.By listing an Exhibit, ██████████ is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same.Not an exhibitNot an exhibit
112.All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to ██████████ objections.Not an exhibitNot addressed at hearing; catch all
113.All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by ██████████ Edwards on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14
Sustained because of breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice to specific documents being produced as set forth above. Specific documents must be culled out; all documents on the docket may not be identified; ██████████ must narrow scope
114.██████████ Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto, and all Undisputed Facts3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 226:15-227:14
Overruled

In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "and/or Property Receipts." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
115.All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery.3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 227:15-229:17
Overruled. ██████ is ordered to produce/cull out within 15 days, if the documents have not already been produced
116.All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
117.All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:18-20
Deferred
118.All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:21-24
Deferred
119.All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 229:25-231:5
Deferred
120.Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
(duplicative of Exhibit No. 8)		12/5/17 Tr. 231:6-9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statement.
121.Photo depicting ██████ Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 231:10-18
Sustained
122.All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 231:19-20
Sustained
123.All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not addressed at hearing
124.Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept.3, 4, 7, 8, 10
duplicative of 45		12/5/17 Tr. 231:21-232:4
Deferred
125.Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 20173, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13Not addressed at hearing
126.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009Not addressed at hearing
127.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ ██████ Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████ J. ██████ and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012Not addressed at hearing; no objections
130.Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter.3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not specifically addressed at hearing but duplicative to Exhibit No. 115 and those rulings are incorporated herein
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
131.Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile3, 4, 7, 8Not specifically addressed at hearing, but deferred with Exhibit 63
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 20113, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 232:5-235:9
Deferred
133.Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition93, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Not addressed at hearing; catch all
134.All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
135.Any and all documents produced in this action.12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
136.Any and all depositions taken in this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
137.Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
138.Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
139.Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
140.Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
141.Any and all pleadings filed in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
142.Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all

DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach C rida this day of January, 2018.

THE HONORAB HAFELE CIRCUIT COURT J

9 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended • • ist, has shifted Exhibit Nos. 133 through 142 to Exhibit Nos. 209 through 218. has a so identified new exhibits at Exhibit Nos. 133 through 208. This Order does not make any ru Ins on the new exhibits which may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate.

Copies provided to:

SERVICE LIST

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

EXHIBIT D

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

VS.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,

J. individually, and L.M., individually,

Defendants,

EQSA

COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'SSRbLEY J. a SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST

COMES NOW the Counter-' RADLEY J. a, and hereby files his Amended Exhibit List as follows:

BJE

  • O. No objection 5. Privileged
  • 1. All objections 6. Opinion
  • 2. All objec ea pt authenticity 7. Hearsay
  • 3. Irrelev aterial 8. Authenticity lacking
  • 4. Probafl ie value substantially 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.

Case No. 502009CAUM9ZXW. aag:

Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Second Amended Exhibit List

No. 1. 2. 3.Counter-Plaintiff Marked Marked for Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification All applicable criminal statutes. All applicable Florida Statutes. airplanes and automobiles. AS
4.Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase 0 of books SM 101: A Realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abema A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their
5.Non-Prosecution Agreement. \
6.Jane Doe 102 Complaint.
7.Messages taken from m \*ound at Epstein's home.
8.Documents relat Epstein produced by Alfredo Rod
9.Jeffrey Ep 's flight logs.
10.Je Epst 's phone records.
11.len's phone records.
1isitation Logs. 13. Y Jeffrey Epstein's probation file.
14.All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
15.Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
16.Video of Epstein Property Inspection, 01/18/10.
17.Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's
18.Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all
19.All records of homes, properties, bank accounts
20.Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy).
OO 1S
22.List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epste'
23.Yearbooks of Jane Doe.
24.2002 Palm Beach High Sc k.
25.2001 Palm Beach Hi ear Book.
26.2003 Palm Beach Gar chool Year Book.
27.Affidavit and A t or Search Warrant
on Jeffrey Epste 's h e (from Palm Beach
State Attorney's , Exhibit #29).
28.Note s fo nd in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or
d ' trash ulls outside of his home during
29. ,÷g ' aim Beach State Attorney's Criminal file
30.All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08
31.Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy.
32.List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
33.All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
34.All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
35.Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him.
36.All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant.
37.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
38.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB.
39.Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG.
40.Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein.
41.Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets.
42.Video footage (DVD) of walk through site
43.Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats
44.Probable Cause Affidavits re against
Jeffrey Epstein and 464488k
45.Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey
47.Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report is)
48.Palm Beach Police Department I Report dated
49.All reports and documer rated by Palm
Beach Police Dep t to Jeffrey Epstein.
50.All Witness Stat en erated by Palm
Beach Police nt relating to Jeffrey
51.P er MRttifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft
52.nger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein.
54.Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements.
55.Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns.
56.MC2 emails involving communications of

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009111111111MBAG Counter-Plaint if's, Second Amended Exhibit List

Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant.
57.DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08.
58.Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08.
59.Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated
07/25/06 (unredacted) Aetisc
60.No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. ()
61.Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
62.Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Co I i Control and Probation.
63.Jef₹'rey Epstein's Sex Offender Regis 11s , m various states).
64.Jeffrey Epstein's Booking ph p
65.CAD calls to 358 EL B Y,
PALM BEACH FL O.
66.List of Jeffrey E , use contacts.
67.Documen tt lated itlir to Jeffrey Epstein's investments.
68.Lett m ief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler.
69... , B h Police Department Incident Report dated 06 (redacted)D
tter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/11/06.
71.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/13/06.

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009c69MOISMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Second Amended Exhibit List

72.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
73.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
74.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
75.Letter from Goldberger, 06/22/06.
76.All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. c
77.Documents related to the rental of a ye
78.Ted's Sheds Documents.
79.Documents related to proms s es of
80.Arrest Warrant o ai dtlen.
81.Police report reg picking
up money d r -28-04.
82.Li se c Tri lat ral Commission Members of 2003.
83.a howitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute
84.Guy Fronstin letter dated 04/17/06.
85.Jeffrey Epstein Account Information.
86.Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet.
87.JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest.
88.Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest.
89.Flight information for
90.Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005.
91.Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: Maria.
92.Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case.
404 A
93.Jeffrey Epstein 5t^ Amendment Speech.
94.IC:4).( Reiter letter to Krisher, 05/01/06.
95.Police Report, 11/28/04.
96.Victim's school records and transcripts. \
97.Victim Notification letter to Virgi % a re , 09/03/08
98.Police report of Juan Alessi e t J y Epstein's
99.Victim's Medical R Dr. Randee Speciale.
100.All surveillance ondu t d by law
enforcement on Epstein's home.
101.Emails re c rom Palm Beach Records
rel to Je y Epstein.
102.et em listed on the Palm Beach Police Property
rt, Lists and/or Property Receipts.
1011copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein.
104.Jeffrey Epstein criminal records.
105.All documents produced by Palm Beach Police
106.Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped
107.Any and all expert witness reports and/or records
party to this cause. AeAsk
108.Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not
109.reserves all objections to Epstein'
110.reserves the right to supplem
111.By listing an Exhibit, Edward no ving
his right to object to same at a oes not
waive their right to ame e.
112.All exhibits listed subject to
113.All pleadi and a chments in the action
under the ictims Rights Act prosecuted
by B ley wards on behalf of victims of
E 's criminal molestations.
Ed s' Motions for Summary Judgment, all
115.All time records and hourly billing
116.All deposition testimony and discovery responses
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
117.All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding.
118.All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition.
119.All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations.
120.Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez.
121.Photo depicting ██████████, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew.
122.All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein owned or controlled aircraft.
123.All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case.
124.Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept.
125.Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017.
126.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████████ J. ██████████ and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009.
127.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████████ J. ██████████ and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013.
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, ██████████ J. ██████████ and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ ██████████ Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013.
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J.
130.Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records
131.Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: l'
133.Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Ho
134.Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (sign
135.Proposed Joint Letter to the S ml r.
136.Front and Back of Hard Col Photo Virginia
137.Color photo of V im its on ferry "New York".
138.Scenic photo of Tii Square.
139.Virgi "tt Ro crt photo on back of ship.
140.room in New York.
141.photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch).
142.Color photo of at Zorro Ranch
143.photo on horse front of ranch.
144.photo standing against rocks (red

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 5020091.0 tX CXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Second Amended Exhibit List

145.=ding against rocks (red coat) (far)
(with back photo I= back date).
146.photo riding horse blue jacket far.
147.photo on side of horse hand up.
148.photo on side of horse. Ad ak'
149.photo outside next to tables.
150.photo red coat leaning on rail.
151.photo standing outside next to
152.photo standing in front o
153.Millp photo with hand ov
154.photo standi t td piano.
155.photo ' fireplace (museum).
156.o nt of wagon in museum.
157.Color photo of in front of museum
exhibition ( Fe, New Mexico).
158.Pho ph i pain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine
159.is (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2.
160.Cover photo book 2.
161.Scenic photo (with back photo M).
162.Scenic photo (with back photo M.
163.Scenic photo (with back photo M.
164.Scenic photo (with back photo M.
165.steps with trees overhead.
166.Scenic photo (with back photo In.
167.Scenic photo (with back photo I M) .
168.Scenic photo (with back photo M).
169.Scenic photo (with back photo M). C) "
170.Scenic photo (with back photo and black).
171.)) Scenic photo (with back photo and blac? 5
172.Scenic photo (with back photo an
173.on steps with chi ' ck photo
174.on street (far) (with back
photo and black).
175.Travel envelope.
176.Singapore Airlin el Cover with handwritten notes
by Virginia ' i its.
177.Thai Hott Receipts.
178.o D ket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein.
17List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the
180.Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16
181.FBI Form 302 - Interview of in
182.Mark Epstein Deposition.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
183.March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File).
184.Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein.
185.Airport Codes (Demonstrative).
186.March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up!
187.DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1.
188.[REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05.
189.Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account.
190.Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files).
191.Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005.
192.Folder titled Sara [REDACTED]: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement.
193.Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez.
194.Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997).
195.Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
196.Palm Beach House/Information Sheet
197.Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach
198.Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09.
199.Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. ,O4.14/\1 1
200.Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100.
201.Passport application; issued January 12, 2001. CO %
202.Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez.
203.Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez. ,S )
204.Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez,,
205..‘ Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's pro es and planes.
206.Photos of Jeffrey Epstein e y and former
207.Jeffrey Epstein G " ocuments.
208.Palm Beach Count C e Attorney's Response to Public
Records R including audio recordings).
209.Any d all nses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with
o th eposition.
210.errogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to
211.Any and all documents produced in this action.
212.Any and all depositions taken in this action.
213.Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M..
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List

214.Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition.
215.Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action.
216.Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal.
217.Any and all pleadings filed in this action.
218.Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017.

Jack Scarola
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com
Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M..
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED]. Second Amended Exhibit List

COUNSEL LIST

Jack Scarola, Esquire
scarolateam@searcylaw.com;
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Scott J. Link, Esq.
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: 561-727-3600
Fax: 561-727-3601
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-655-4777
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 hc.gargiaaaMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Second Amended Exhibit List

J. , Esquire alle®pathtojusti Jaffe WeissingilinFistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Alk "

,1O

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 C O efiling®tonjahaddad.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716

iS 5)

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein c

?S'

EXHIBIT E

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

PlaintifUCounter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

Cos

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S 0 S TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND D EXHIBIT LIST

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps in") hereby files his Objections to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. wards") Second Amended Exhibit List dated December 7, 2017, and states: <claw'

ARY STATEMENT

On November 9, 2017, ds filed his Amended Exhibit List identifying 142 exhibits. (D.E. 1043.) On N s vem r 1 , 2017, Epstein filed his Objections to exhibits. (D.E. 1058.) In add(i— o s ovember 17, 2017, Epstein filed his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine which, in ed those objections. (D.E. 1070.) The Court heard extensive arguments on Epstein's ections at special set hearings on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, and made rulings on those objections. While, to date, an Order has not been entered memorializing those rulings, Epstein incorporates them herein.

C)

2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance < PC)C I — All Objections 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed by o unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation e evidence 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 9 — Other (please identify basis b 10 — Completeness 11 — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Cou r Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 — Not a proper e> ibit 14 — Trade secre

On December 7, 2017, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List identifying 218 exhibits, which modified some of his earlier disclosed exhibits and identified 79 new items.' (D.E. 1109.) At no time during the special set hearings did counsel advise the Court that he intended to amend the Exhibit List or that the panics and Court were working from an incorrect list.

Epstein will be filing a renewed Motion in Liminc to address M iltAikdisclosed exhibits. For ease of reference, Epstein has highlighted the changes and n c5' 'dentified.

LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:

OBJECTIONS

No.4%•-1 Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
1.II applicable criminal statutes3, 4, 7, 11, 12
2.All applicable Florida Statutes3, 4, 7, II, 12
3.Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes,

While produced many of the new exhibits on November 9, 2017, he never identified them as trial exhibits on his Exhibit List and Epstein was not aware that he intended to rely on them at trial at the time of filing his Omnibus Motion in Limine.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
4.Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy:

A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners"		3, 4, 7, 8
5.Non-Prosecution Agreement3, 4, 7, 8, 10
6.Jane Doe 102 Complaint3, 4, 7, 13
7.Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
8.Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
9.Jeffrey Epstein flight logs3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11
10.Jeffrey Epstein phone records3, 4, 10, 11, 14
11.██████████ phone records3, 4, 8, 10, 11 14
12.Jail Visitation Logs3, 4, 7, 8, 11
13.Jeffrey Epstein's probation file3, 4, 7, 8, 11
14.All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 10
15.Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8
16.Video of Epstein Property Inspection!
01/18/10		3, 4, 8
17.Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read
18.Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints")
19.All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets12
20.Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy)12
21.Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy)Cannot be read, 3, 14
22.List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 12
23.Yearbooks of Jane Doe3, 4, 7, 8, 12
24.2002 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 12
25.2001 ██████████ Palm Beach High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 12
26.2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book3, 4, 7, 8, 12
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED] Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
27.Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home (from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29)13, 4, 7, 8, 10,
28.Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14
29.The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13
30.All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction3, 4, 7, 8, 12
31.Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy3, 4, 7, 8, 12
32.List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item.
33.All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 13
34.All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 13
35.Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him3, 4, 11, 12, 13
36.All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant3, 4, 11, 12, 13. This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit.
37.Jeffrey Epstein2 Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-810923, 4, 11, 12, 13
38.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB3, 4, 11, 12, 13
39.Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG3, 4, 11, 12, 13
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
40.Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or
41.Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets3, 4, 7, 8, 14
42.Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of
43.Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and
44.Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein
3,4, 10,S?
„ 14
45.Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's
46.Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to
47.Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report of Victim, 6, 7, 8,14
48.Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report d
All reports and documentation generated by h
50.All Witness Statements generated by c Police
51.Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey E t 's rcraft and
52.Passenger lists for flights key Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12
53.Letter from Jeffrey E•frateeii
7 berto Pinto regarding3, 4, 7, 8, 10
54.Jeffrey Epstein's ban tEments3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14
55.Jeffrey Epstein tpreturns
56.MC2 ' s inv communications of Jeffrey Epstein,
Je er, aritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc
B nel d Amanda Grant
57.lea and colloquy taken on 6-30-083, 4, 8, 12, 13
58.ranscript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-083, 4,13
59.Palm Beach Police Department
Incident Report dated3,4, 7, 8
60.No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 13
61.Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 12
62.Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community
No.Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections
63.Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various
64.Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph3, 4, 7, 8, Document says
65.CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL
66.List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts3, 4, 7, 8, 1 document
provided • reflective
of d 'on)
67.Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments3, 12, 14
68.Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler
69.Palm Beach Police Department incident Report dated3, f f
70.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorn- dat
71.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant Statey ated
72.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistanttto ey dated
73.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assitat Attorney dated
74.Letter from Guy FronstinState Attorney dated
75.Letter from Goldbe r t22-06 3,4, 7, 8
76.All subpoenas issuedto Grand Jury 3, 4, 7, 8,13
77.Documents relarthe rental of a vehicle for
? S"
78.Itt -• Documents3, 4, 7, 8, document
79.Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey
80.Arrest Warrant of3,4,7, 8
81.Police report regardingpicking up money 3, 4, 7, 8, 10
82.List of Trilateral Commission Members of 20033,4, 7, 8, 10
No.Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections
83.Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.4103, 4, 7, 8, 12
84.Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-063,4,7, 8
85.Jeffrey Epstein Account Information3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14
86.Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet3, 4, 7, 8, 12
87.JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 1
88.Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest3, 4, 7, 8 1
89.Flight information for3, 4, 7 0, 1
90.Passenger List Palm Beach flights 20053 , 0, 11
91.Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.ke Maria3, 8, 10, 12
92.Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US casec , 4, 12 (document
93.Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech3,4, 12
94.Reiter letter to 1Crisher dated 5-1-063, 4, 7, 8, 12
95.Police Report dat3, 4, 7, 8, 10
96.Victim's school records and .np 3, 4, 7, 8
97.Victim Notification letterVi ,(ZI1 09/03/08 3, 4, 7, 8
98.Police report of Juan ssat Jeffrey Epstein's home 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
99.Victim's Medical Rm Dr. Randee Speciale 3,4, 6,7, 8
100. All surveillancted by law enforcement on Jeffrey
Epstein' me
101. Emailived from Palm Beach Records related to
Je n
102.I'tem listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report 3, 4, 7, 8,12 (items not
L • or Property Receiptiprovided)
copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 12
104. Jeffrey Epstein criminal records3, 4, 7, 8, 12
No.Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections
109 reserves all objections to Epstein's ExhibitsNot an exhibit
110. reserves the right to supplement and/or amend hisNot an exhibit
111. By listing an Exhibit,is not waiving his right to Not an ex ibi
112. All exhibits listed by Epstein subject toN 'bit
113. All pleadings and attachments in the actin nr th
3, , 8, 12, 13
114. Motions for Summary Judgment, all ac ,
116. All deposition testimony and discoveses by
117. All pleadings filed by Epsteina bankruptcy
118. All submissions by Epsteection with the
119. All Settlement Agreen en Epstein and victims of
120. Phone Journaln from Epstein's home and produced to
the FBI by Alfrodriguez
121. Photo ep ingGhislaine Maxwell and 3, 4, 7, 8
P • ce w
122. 1 logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12
1 ails produced by Defendant and/or all emails
124. Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept.3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative
126. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein,J. and
127. Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein,J. and 3, 4, 7, 13
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED] Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 20133, 4, 7, 13
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012
130.Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter.3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12
131.Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile3, 4, 7, 8
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 20113, 4, 7, 8
133.Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital re: Virginia Guiffre, 20013, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10
134.Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (signed by Matt Groening).3, 4, 7, 8
135.Proposed Joint Letter to the Special Master3, 4, 6, 7, 8
136.Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Photo Virginia (Marla-Lago).3, 4, 7, 8
137.Color photo of [REDACTED] on ferry "New York"3, 4, 7, 8
138.Scenic photo of Time Square3, 4, 7, 8
139.[REDACTED] photo on back of ship3, 4, 7, 8
140.Picture of room in New York3, 4, 7, 8
141.Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch)3, 4, 7, 8
142.Color photo of Virginia [REDACTED] at Zorro Ranch standing in front of gate sign with "Z" (New Mexico Ranch)3, 4, 7, 8
143.Virginia Roberts photo on horse front of ranch3, 4, 7, 8
144.Virginia Roberts photo standing against rocks (red coat)3, 4, 7, 8
145.Virginia [REDACTED] standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo [REDACTED]; back date).3, 4, 7, 8
146.Virginia [REDACTED] photo riding horse blue jacket far3, 4, 7, 8
147.[REDACTED] photo on side of horse hand up3, 4, 7, 8
148.[REDACTED] photo on side of horse3, 4, 7, 8
149.[REDACTED] photo outside next to tables3, 4, 7, 8
150.[REDACTED] photo red coat leaning on rail3, 4, 7, 8
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
151.photo standing outside next to fireplace3, 4, 7, 8
152.photo standing in front of ranch3 4 7 8
153.photo with hand over head(blacle3, 4, 7, 8
154.photo standing next to piand3, 4, 7, 8
155.photo in front of fireplace(museum)3 4 7 8
156.photo in front of wagon in museum3,4, 7, 8
157. Color photo ofin front of museum3, 4
159.(Australia Storage): Photo Book 2,7, 8
160. Cover photo book 23,4, 7, 8
161. Scenic photo (with back photo3 4 7 8
162. Scenic photo (with back photo0,4, 7, 8
163. Scenic photo (with back photo whit3,4, 7, 8
164. Scenic photo (with back photo wifit3,4,7,8
165.steps wit head3 4 7 8
166. Scenic photo (with back photoi )3 4 7 8
167. Scenic photo (with back photoM)3 4 7 8
168. Scenic photoback photo3 4 7 8
169. Scenico back photo3,4, 7, 8
170. S• h with back photo and black)3,4, 7, 8
171. coto (with back photo and black)3 4 7 8
1 is photo (with back photoand black)3 4 7 8
173.on steps with children (with back photd3, 4, 7, 8
174.on street wall (far)Awith back3 4 7 8
photoand black).
175. Travel envelope3,4,7,8
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's Objections
177.Thailand Hotel Receipts3, 4, 7, 8
178.Court Docket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 13
179.Typed List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 10
180.Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/163, 4, 7, 8, 14
181.FBI Form 302 - Interview of [REDACTED] in Australia (Redacted) 03/17/113, 4, 7, 8, 10
182.Mark Epstein Deposition3, 4, 7, 8
183.March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File)3, 4, 7, 8, 10
184.Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8
185.Airport Codes (Demonstrative)3, 7, 8, 10
186.March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up!3, 4, 7, 8
187.DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk (Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1)3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (only photo of DVDs provided)
188.[REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/053, 4, 7, 8, 10
189.Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11
190.Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files)3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11
191.Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/20053, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11
192.Folder titled Sara Kellen: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11
193.Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 14
194.Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997)3, 4, 7, 8
195.Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8
196.Palm Beach House/Information Sheet3, 4, 7, 8
197.Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach Police Department3, 4, 7, 8
198.Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/093, 4, 7, 8
No.Exhibit Description Epstein's Objections
199. Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol 11) 09/08/093 4 7 8
200. Brochure for Boeing Super 727-1003, 4
201. Passport application; issued January 12, 20013 4 7 8 10
202. Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodrigud3, 4, 6,\_Z
203. Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguei3, 4, 6,3
204. Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodrigud3,4, 7, 8
205. Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planed3, 4,/ 0
206. Photos of Jeffrey Epstein employees and former employed 3 S , 0
207. Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents'3
208. Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Pu' \_, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13
209. Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces TeQi r
210. All Interrogatories and Answers thereto,u
Produce and Responses, Requests forsio and
211. Any and all documents produced n's a ion. 12
212. Any and all depositions tak' ction. 12, 13
213. Any documents or othi ched to or used during
214. Any and all exhibits,ents, etc. referred to in any
215. Any and all dand exhibits designated by all
parties t is a
216. Any andc exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal
t i
217. an II pleadings filed in this action12,13
2and all records produced or that will be produced by

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

Gs'

By. Is/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ocklAiw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com

(S• Sie• i r Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+
+

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

+

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

+

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

+

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

+

EXHIBIT F

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800MaMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff, VS.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually,

Defendant,

Cos

SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J.

Counter-Plaintiff, J. ED ;llW and through his undersigned attorneys,

hereby supplements his list of witnesses trial follows:

WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED

  • 1. Bradley J. Ed 2.. Jeffrey E
  • 3.
  • 5. ep enson
    • W. Peachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017 do Sta Po iger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800X.X.)OCMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 2 of 22

  • 6.
  • 7. IIMIguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York 10016 do Peter Gturguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York, 10016 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449
  • 8. 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 S5
  • 9. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Sty Miami, FL 33131
  • 10. Robert C. Jose Podhurst Orsec One S.E. rd Avenu Suite 2700 Miami, FL
  • 11.
  • 112. ÷ Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Recarey ch Police Department outh County Road Beach, FL 33480
  • 13. JohaSstwolly do & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020

i )

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 3 of 22

  • 14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
  • 15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301
  • 16. Antonio (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida
  • 17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480
  • 18. Records Custodian of Unit for the Southern District S? 4V:rimy's Office
  • 19. Records Custodi eral Bureau of Investigations
  • 20. Spencer Kuvin, 1800 S. A tmlian venue, #400 West Palm Florida 33409 +22. Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor New York, NY 10017
  • 21. re Leopold, Esquire Istein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
  • 23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

lgrt009CA040800XXXXMBAG

DV. EPSTEIN

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. IM

Page 4 of 22

  • 24. Isidro M. ME Esquire =Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401
  • 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O
  • 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. HCC West Palm Beach, FL 33409
  • 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. ACIcA ) 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431

C '

WITNESS CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES

  • 28.
  • 29. arl Tho as c/ L York Times i rh Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022
  • 31. LaVecchio !!!Unite !!tes Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 5 of 22

32.

[REDACTED]

c/o Adam Horowitz.

Horowitz Law

425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

33.

Evgenia Ignatieva

1650 Broadway, #910

New York, NY 10019

34.

[REDACTED]

35.

[REDACTED]

c/o Adam Horowitz.

Horowitz Law

425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

36.

[REDACTED]

c/o Jack Scarola

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.

West Palm Beach, FL 33409

37.

[REDACTED]

c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.

Podhurst Orseck, PA

One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, FL 33131

38.

Brandy Brenson

c/o Spencer Kuvin

1800 South Australian Ave #400

West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

39.

[REDACTED]

c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.

Podhurst Orseck, PA

One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, FL 33131

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 6 of 22

40. [REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

41. William Scherer, Esquire
633 S Federal Hwy #800
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

42. Paul Cassell, Esq.
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112

43. [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

44. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]

45. [REDACTED] Cartwright
c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, PA
One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
Miami, FL 33131

46. [REDACTED]
c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, PA
One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
Miami, FL 33131

47. [REDACTED]
c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, PA
One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
Miami, FL 33131

-ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 7 of 22

  • 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edwards Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW1A 1 AA
  • 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown
  • 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131
  • 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036
  • 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, F 934gt a mir St
  • 53.
  • 54. do Adam Horo Horowitz 425 North Fort --uderilale FL 33301 Avenue, Suite 2 obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. A7 \ 11 n urst Orseck, PA e S.E. rAvenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131
  • 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 8 of 22

56.

do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

57.

do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3"I Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480

59.

60.

do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131

do Robert C. Jo Podhurst Orsec One S.E. 3r Aven ,'Suite 2700 Miami, FL

peter Kuvin South Australian Ave #400 t Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128

63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW r d AVE., Miami, FL 33169

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 9 of 22

64.

[REDACTED], Esq.
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

65.

[REDACTED], Esq.
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

66.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

67.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

68.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

69.

Nezbitt Kurkendall
Federal Bureau of Investigation
16320 NW 2nd Ave.
Miami, FL 33169

70.

[REDACTED]
c/o Isidro M. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page IO of 22

71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown

72. Address Currently Unknown

73. 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021

74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 3

77. Any additional indj Office and who supplied as it re entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA.

78. Leslie W imit Parkway C us, Ohio 43206

Cos

79 dent Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022

80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401

81. Mari tza Vasquez 1293 SW 215` Terrace Miami, FL 33145

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Page 11 of 22

  1. 82. Maximilia [REDACTED]
    c/o William Unroch, Esquire
    140 West End, Apt. 30-BW
    New York, NY 10023
  2. 83. [REDACTED]
    c/o Spencer Kuvin
    1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
  3. 84. [REDACTED]
    2915 Share Rd. 111
    Tallahassee, FL 31312
  4. 85. [REDACTED]
    c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
    Podhurst Orseck, PA
    One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
    Miami, FL 33131
  5. 86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin)
    11675 Glowing Sunset Lane
    Las Vegas, NV 89135
  6. 87. [REDACTED]
  7. 88. Michael Fisten
    Weston, FL
  8. 89. Russell Adler
    Delray Beach, FL
  9. 90. [REDACTED] Alessi
    6791 Fairway Lakes Dr.
    Boynton Beach, FL 33472
  10. 91. Janusz Banasiak
    358 El Brillo Way
    Palm Beach, FL, 33480

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 12 of 22

92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480

93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472

94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253

95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942

96. Rosalie 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253

97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently

98.

99. an, South Africa

nn Dubin 040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137

101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206

102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road

J.

COSA

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 13 of 22

Palm Beach, FL 33480

103. Officer Minot
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

104. Sgt. Sorge
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

105. [REDACTED]
Address Currently Unknown

106. [REDACTED] Pagnano
1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

107. Stephan Kosslyn
28 Garfield Street
Cambridge, [REDACTED] 02138-1802

108. Cecile Dejongh
23 S Estate Mafolie
St. [REDACTED] VI 00802

109. Tommy Mottola
302 Caribbean Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480-3012

110. Mike Sanka
449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

111. [REDACTED]

112. William "Bill" [REDACTED]
5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391
Coral Springs, FL 33076

MIIMADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XX)OCMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M.

Page 14 of 22

  • 113. Howard Rubenstein 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105
  • 114. Robert Meister 101 Seminole Ave. Palm Beach, FL 33480
  • 115. Todd Meister 101 Seminole Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480
  • 116. President William J. Clinton
  • 117. William Hammond 2965 Fontana Place Palm Beach, FL
  • 118. Robert Roxburgh 5600 North Flagler Dr, #250 West Palm Beach, Flori
  • 119. Michele Pagan Palm Beach Pol. 345 South Coun Palm Beach FL 3 0
  • 120. Mic e Da P each Police Department o County Road Beach, FL 33480 ent my Fortimer 12309 North Old Country Road Wellington, FL 33414

122.

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 15 of 22

123. [REDACTED]

124. [REDACTED]

125. [REDACTED]

126. Latasha Lowe
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

127. [REDACTED]

128. Zack Bryan
1150 Larch Way
Wellington, Florida

129. [REDACTED]

130. Larry Morrison
11148 Cobblefield Dr..
Wellington, FL 33449

131. Story Cowles
801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

132. Michael Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 16 of 22

  • 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134
  • 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101
  • 135. Sergia Cordero 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131
  • 136. Cassandra Rivera 5011 El Clain Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415
  • 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3
  • 138.
  • 139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown
  • 140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown
  • 141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025
  • 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown
  • 143. Amazon Records Custodian
  • 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian

.1. DV. EPSTEIN 009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff a.

Page 17 of 22

  • 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian
  • 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian
  • 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian 5770 East Milton Road Milton, FL
  • 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian 3344 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite C-I24 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 C.)
  • 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian 901 45th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401
  • 150. Wellington Regina! Hospital Reco 10104 Forrest Hill Blvd. Wellington, FL 33414 S\,,
  • 151. All witnesses that Defer hav listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff.
  • 152. All rebuttal wi
  • 153. All Peopl n Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail.

WJ ES TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION

  • 155. lo llirsq. A fu

  • 156.

Epstein andam Street ew York, NY 10013

  • 157. Alfredo Rodriguez

DV. EPSTEIN No.: t009CA040800:OOCXMBAG Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. Page 18 of 22

do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 11349 SW 86TH Lane Miami, FL

  • 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

  • 159. Jeffrey Epstein

  • 160. Horowitz Law do Adam Horo witz. 425 Noth Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 \ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 EXPER"SSSES

  • 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Sc art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac lvd. West Palm Beac 3409

CO

The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di t he prosecution of the Epstein claims.

162.N scert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

  • 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

  • 167. Isidro M. Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401
  • 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire S ue 1600 Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL
  • 169. William Berger, Weiss, Handler, I, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, uite 218A Boca Rato 33431
  • 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
  • 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 A(Iptc Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
  • 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 "S C)

Plaintiff reserves 44 ght / to amend this list.

l ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M.

Page 19 of 22

O '

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 20 of 22

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017.

JACK SCAROLA

Florida Bar No.: 169440

Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com

Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.

2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard

West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

Phone: (561) 686-6300

Fax: (561) 383-9451

Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff

Page 21 of 22

COUNSEL LIST

Jack Scarola, Esquire
scarolateam@searcylaw.com;
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Scott J. Link, Esq.
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: 561-727-3600
Fax: 561-727-3601
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-655-4777
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J.

Page 22 of 22

J. M, Esquire

staff efile@pathtojusticomn

Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)-524-2820

Fax: (954)-524-2822 A"\' CO 'S Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 5) ? ' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire

tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com

Tonja Haddad, P.A.

315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301

Fax: (954)-337-3716

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)467-1223

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire

marc@nuriklaw.com

One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700

Phone: (954)-745-5849

Fax: (954)-745-3556

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..682ba9c6367446c44b3c9be575392cc8ea1c1747 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151/EFTA02764151.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,6509 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764151.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 151, + "chars": 369861, + "elapsed_seconds": 56.15, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT' Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION IN LIMINE ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S NEWLY \nDISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS AND TO EXCLUDE DEPOSITION \nTESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO E NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 521.2072143554688, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 521.2072143554688, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N) - PRELIMINARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.26998901367188, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 390.75177001953125, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 390.75177001953125, + 545.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 174.26998901367188, + 545.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 rn 1 hi its and Rahn", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 289.476, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 289.476, + 572.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 572.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "New 79 Untimely Exhibits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 286.9263916015625, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 286.9263916015625, + 196.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 196.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 500.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 500.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NEWLY IDENTIFIED EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 414.3164978027344, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 414.3164978027344, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\\\nB. Travel and Airplane Related Exhi Aits cot", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 345.499267578125, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 345.499267578125, + 373.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 373.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e ecords", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 224.2230224609375, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 224.2230224609375, + 555.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 555.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Photographs", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 213.06407165527344, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 213.06407165527344, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Other Individuals", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 239.48385620117188, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 239.48385620117188, + 307.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 307.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Criminal Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 238.77352905273438, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 238.77352905273438, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Punitive Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 363.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 363.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Other Reaftkir ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 483.9375 + ], + [ + 231.61001586914062, + 483.9375 + ], + [ + 231.61001586914062, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMELY NEW EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 472.06756591796875, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 472.06756591796875, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 361.4000549316406, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 361.4000549316406, + 196.863037109375 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 196.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. \"I he 79 New Exhibits are Untimely Pursuant to this Court's Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 450.0570983886719, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 450.0570983886719, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. The Newly Identified Exhibits Must be Excluded Pursuant to Sections 90.401 and \n90.403, Florida Statutes.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 542.65673828125, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 542.65673828125, + 624.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 624.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Exhibits itch t i ii tt to Prior Con\\ illiffilti and Criminal Matters Must Also Be Excluded.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6956787109375, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6956787109375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Other Exhibits Must be Excluded as Inadmissible Ilearsay.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 414.72039794921875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 414.72039794921875, + 85.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 85.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Certain Exhibits Should be Excluded as Inadmissible Opinion Testimony.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 488.935791015625, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 488.935791015625, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Exhibits Should be Excluded for Other Reasons as Well.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 400.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7. The Deposition Transcripts and Witnesses Presented Through Deposition Testimony Should Not be Allowed", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 496.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(D.E. 1109) Exhibit D.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 188.53314208984375, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 188.53314208984375, + 321.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 321.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 328.644, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 328.644, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 494.75799560546875, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 494.75799560546875, + 127.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 127.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.70000000000005, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.70000000000005, + 403.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 403.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.232, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 374.7850036621094, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 374.7850036621094, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 236.232, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 355.91131591796875, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 355.91131591796875, + 134.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 134.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC The hearing of these matters will go forward on these dates only if the Court's trial docket is open] + +has noticed this Motion for UMC on February 21, 2018, as a back-up date should this matter not be reached on February 20, 2018. + +2has noticed this Motion for UMC on February 28, 2018, as a back-up date should this matter not be reached on February 20, 2018. + +Pursuant to the Court's judicial instructions: + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel the hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages and should denote the hearing time. +- 4. My materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. +- 6. No post-hearing submittals will be accepted unless requested by the + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telep e with the attorney(A) few all parties who may be affected by the relief sou in motion in a goodlnith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may b affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communic y e-mailn to attempt to resolve this matter. + +One or more of the pare ay be affected by the motion are self represented. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Frt2 Primary: Scott®Iin ock9tw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S nkrocklaw.com inkrocklaw.com m Eservice6idinkrocklaw.com + +( )SirCounsel e for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun it, c miento pare poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho, tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama ilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por late dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o in mediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou akte ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou "final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764302/EFTA02764302.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764302/EFTA02764302.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7a15916e83ece6d04e75e0ca2533d9217dcd4cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764302/EFTA02764302.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764302.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 9445, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL SECDEA ING \n(Cancels February 2, 2018 in Light of Court's Unavailability) \n(Date Agreed to oupsel)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 463.47772216796875, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 463.47772216796875, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 403.54888916015625, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 403.54888916015625, + 263.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 263.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764302" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a29c72a60405d5e1c9a3838bb1145a15938a5bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to sections 90.202 and 90.203, Florida Statutes, requests that this Court take judicial notice of the court files and the court documents in the following actions: + +1. 1. *Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE +2. 2. *In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.*, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR +3. 3. *Samantha Baca v. Island Girl*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 16-CACE-003324 +4. 4. *Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor*, U.S.D.C. N.D. Ill. Case No. 15-C-6844 +5. 5. *Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC*, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 +6. 6. *Michael Demella v. The Las Olas Holding Company, Inc.*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 12-028526 +7. 7. ██████████ *Conner v. Clyde Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a All Stars Sports Bar & Grill*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 10-002726 + +1. 8. *Michael Barnes v. Prince's Beach Bar, LLC, d/b/a DP's*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case no. 13-022624 +2. 9. [REDACTED] *J. [REDACTED] and Paul G. Cassell v. Alan M. Dershowitz*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 15-CACE-000072 +3. 10. *State of Florida v. [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]*, Duval County Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-[REDACTED] +4. 11. *State of Florida v. [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]*, Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] +5. 12. *U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2010-CA-002613AXXXCE +6. 13. *Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2010-CA-012467AXXXCE +7. 14. *1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 +8. 15. *Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2012-CC-003827-AXXXWE +9. 16. *Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al.*, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-60294-Civ-Huck-O'Sullivan +10. 17. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 02-26985TCA02 +11. 18. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-016146-AXXX-MB +12. 19. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB +13. 20. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB +14. 21. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB +15. 22. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 5020077-TR-204547-AXXX-MB + +1. 23. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB +2. 24. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB +3. 25. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB +4. 26. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB +5. 27. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB +6. 28. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257-AXXX-NB +7. 29. *Andrew Pastor v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838-XXXXMB +8. 30. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF003921-AXXX-MB +9. 31. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB +10. 32. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 18th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 62010TR074209A88830 +11. 33. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2010-TR-227746-AXXX-MB +12. 34. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2010-TR-227747-AXXX-MB +13. 35. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906-AXXX-MB +14. 36. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-014746-AXXX-SB +15. 37. *State of Florida v. E.W.*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB + +- 38. State of Florida v. E.W, 151° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-CF-005135-AXX3C-MB +- 39. State v. E.W., 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. 2012-CF-0298300001XX +- 40. Eva v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2013-DR-004661-XXXX-MB +- 41. State of Florida v. E.W., 6'h Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County, Case No. 522013CT062524 +- 42. State of Florida v. E.W., 0 Judicial Circuit, Pinellas rase No. 522013TR062559 State of Florida v. E.W., 6'h Judicial Circuit, P el c ounty Case No. 522013TR062943 +- 44. State of Florida v. E.W., Pinellas County Cas 2013-CA021127XXXXNO +- 45. State of Florida v. E.W., Miami aunty Case No. 2013-CF-021127XXXXNO +- 46. State of Florida v. E.W., 6th J t Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA-128504 +- 47. State of Florida v. E. 'cial Circuit, Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 52-2013-CT06 +- 48. State of Florid 6'h Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 52-2013CT0 +- 49. State Flo d v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 20 2614 +- 50. Florida v. E.W., 13i' Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. -MM-015507000AHC +- 51. State of Florida v. E.W., 13d' Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 +- 52. Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W, 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC +- 53. State ofFlorida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case Nos. 2015TR009235000 and 2015TR009236000 + +- 54. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015CF016193000 +- 55. State of Florida v. E. W, Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF +- 56. State of Florida v. E. W, Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02416-OC-CF +- 57. State v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-IN-005174-AXXXX-MB +- 58. State v. Jane Doe, +- 59. State of Florida v. +- 60. State of Florida v. AXXX-MB AXXX-MB 6L State of Florida v. AXXX-MB +- 62. State of Florida v. AXXX-SB +- 63. State of Florida v. +- 64. State of Florida v. AXXX-MB +- 65. State of Florida AXXX-M +- 66. St Florida v. B +- 67. of Florida v. -MB State of Florida v. AXXX-MB +- 69. State of Florida v. AXXX-NB +- 70. State of Florida v. AXXX-MB Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-00 -MB Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. O M-008444- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County C aC)No 50-2009-CT-025833- Jane Doe, Palm Beach c o itVsn ) e No. 50-2010-CT-009222- Jane Doe, Palt\\unty Iiirt Case No. 50-2010-MM-015821- Jane izisr. Pal each County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 alm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-a -035811 e Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-a -037753- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037705- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-039080- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-312095- Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-201I-TR-001899- + +- 79. L.M. Assessment, 15th J 001376 +- 80. L.M. v. John T. DR-003304- +- 71. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703- AXXX-MB +- 72. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15i° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-005406 +- 73. Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB +- 74. Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-20 -002053- XXXX-MB +- 75. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Broward County Case No. 1 F I OA +- 76. Barn Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach C vase No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-1/v1B +- 77. Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Barn Ibrahim4T o A +- c) aim Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB fiCt1 in ), 15i° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach t Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 04-MHudicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007- +- 78. Anna Terry v. Scott and County Court Case No. 04-DR ( S tri +- 81. L.M. v. Jo \*ede1,156Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007- DR 82 -NB +- 82. ague v. L.M., Lee County Case No. 08-DR3141 of Florida v. L.M., Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998- -MB +- 84. State of Florida v. L.M., Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-017555- AXXX-MB +- 85. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-MM-002316-AXXX-MB +- 86. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2013-MM-000924-AXXX-MB + +- 87. Justin Lee Sprague v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2013-DR-001053-XXXX-MB +- 88. Maynor & Associates LLC FKA Maynor Sachs & Copple LLC v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2014-SC-010273-XXXX-MB +- 89. Lexine Turney v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015- DR-010853-XXXX-NB + +To streamline the trial of this matter and to reduce costs, Epstein respectfu 144, nests that the Court take judicial notice of these court records for authenticity section 90.202(6), Florida Statutes, a court may take judicial notice o state or of any court of record of the United States or of any sem cgtSf~s Under any court of this , or jurisdiction of the United States. A court, however, shall take judicial not u atters when (1) proper notice is given to the adverse party, and (2) the court is fu s 1th ctod sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice of the matter. Florida e e § 90.203. + +Epstein has provided notice to notice of these court records. A cases identified above. an unter-Plaintiff and to the Court to take judicial , Epstein respectfully requests judicial notice of the + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..443532bd5f3e402e6b6f25f195f75b591aecd129 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308/EFTA02764308.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764308.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 15378, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 456.8399999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764308" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5536bfb73dc9109d36a0f4f1dbbeef4e78af904e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.md @@ -0,0 +1,524 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RESPONSE THE ADMI Y EPSTEIN'S OUNTER-PLAINTIFF ADDRESSING 132 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaint of Trial Exhibit #13 ("Epstein"), opposes the Motion in Limine ( "), regarding the admissibility ), and states: + +A Cos + +#### BACKGROUND + +In support j e hist licious prosecution Counterclaim, plans to introduce into evidence Ed 'Ali'bit #132, a New York Post article entitled: "Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex , not a predator," February 25, 2011. A copy of the New York Post article is attached xhibit A. + +In the article, Epstein is allegedly quoted as saying: + +I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an offender. It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel. + +The crime that was supposedly committed in Florida is not a crime in New York. + +At the December 5, 2017 hearing, Epstein's counsel voiced multiple objections to the admissibility of Exhibit #132: + +> We raised relevance. We raised probative value substantially outweighed by the danger or unfair prejudice, confusion, misleading the jury, as well as hearsay and authenticity. + +> This is a very good example of an inflammatory exhibit by ,A and it seeks to try to prove, I guess, that [Epstein] person or bad character evidence under 90.404. This is h it should not be admitted. It would be inflammat prejudicial to [Epstein]. + +(12/5/17 Tr. 235:10-22).1 + +The Court deferred ruling on the admissibili No 235:5-9). xhibit. (12/5/17 Tr. 234:21-24, + +It seems obvious from simpl there is a significant difference register as a sexual offender. In e alleged quote that Epstein was explaining that sification as a registered sexual predator and having to Epstein did register as required by the plea deal as a sexual offender — NOT a gm ed sexual predator. But more importantly, this case is not about c piii Epstein's plea n y a decade ago in an entirely separate criminal matter. This is not a case about wh p ein actually made the statements attributed to him. Nor is this a case about Epstein's tus as a registered sex offender or the offense giving rise to such status, particularly as the sole victim identified in connection with that offense (AD) was not and has never been a client of Rather, this is a case about the economic windfall that seeks for his + +### INT4.140N + +Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit B. + +alleged "daily anxiety" and "emotional distress" that he began to suffer upon Epstein's filing of a Complaint against him in December 2009 -- more than eight years ago -- and has continued to suffer unabatedly through today due to his "destroyed reputation." + +Interestingly, in January 2015, sued Alan Dershowitz (one of Epstein's attorneys) for defamation.2 In that Complaint, alleged: + +(Dersh mplaint, ¶ 8, emphasis added.) (Exhibit C.) + +attack his reputation and character: alleged that Dershowitz made a media )t c) ► **him (and Paul G. Cassel) to 5( t** + +Despite having previously been the victim of character assassination by the Defendant ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S associate and client, Jeffrey Epstein, J. en s a la' favorable national reputation particularly related to his defending the rights of child victims of sexual abuse. + +**DERSHOWITZ initiated a blic media assault on the reputation and character of L J. and PAUL G. CASSEL accusing thcrivof in tionally lying in their filing, of having leveled Icnowi falseraccusations against the Defendant DERSHOWITZ, without ever conducting any investigation of the creditability of t ccutations, and of having acted unethically to the extent that eir jvtllful misconduct warranted and required disbarment.** + +**(Dershowitz, Comp t, 111 71.r(Exhibit C.)** + +**In Ap • 01 wards, Cassel and Dershowitz resolved their respective claims and l informed the Court that the filing of their action against Dershowitz was a "tactical ." (Dershowitz, Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.)** + +**(Exhibit D.)** + +**2 J. and Paul G. Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17' Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-15-000072.** + +In order to maximize his recovery on his claims against Dershowitz, had to allege that his reputation had recovered and that Dershowitz' defaming public statements caused harm to his reputation. Now that has admitted that suing Dershowitz was a tactical mistake, he claims that Epstein is once again the cause of harm to his reputation. + +Epstein has tried to appropriately focus this case on the publicly available information about Rothstein, the Ponzi scheme, the use oft clients' cases against Eps the Ponzi scheme and the excessive and unorthodox litigation practices engaged wards while holding himself out as a partner of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. ely, has been relentless with his attempts to inject irrelevant, highly prej dt) • \*al Inflammatory evidence into the trial which has no bearing on the malicious prosec i( o k)i , and can only result in unfair to Epstein, confusion of the jury, and un n n y second trial of this case. + +### AR + +argues that Exhibit #1 ' role t, not unfairly prejudicial, and not barred by the hearsay rule. His main conten the article is relevant to the punitive damages claim in that it tends to prove Epste f remorse. Specifically, says that he believes the comments demonstrate a remorse for the underlying crimes and then, in order to attempt to make it releva ys it emonstrates a lack of remorse in attempting to cover up the crimes, which • is why Epstein filed suit. + +erlying crime to which Epstein is alleged to have made these statements to the press is the procurement crime. That is the only crime that gives rise to the sex offender registration. The procurement crime, according to the information, relates exclusively to AD, who was not a client of The notion that Epstein filed this original civil proceeding to cover up the offense makes no sense and has no nexus to Furthermore, if there was a lack of remorse for the procurement plea relating to AD, that would only, if it were in fact an accurate quote, relate to a punitive damage claim by AD. It has absolutely no bearing on whether Epstein has any remorse or motivation for suing . arguments are all meritless and unfounded, and his Motion in Limine should be denied. Epstein requests that this Court sustain the objections raised by Epstein in his Objections to Trial Exhibits (D.E. 1058; 1120) and at the December 5, 2017, hearing, and consider the additional arguments ma + +### Exhibit #132 Constitutes Inadmissible Hearsay and Lacks Releva + +First and foremost, Exhibit #132 contains inadmissible h applies. Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the i:In d t ile testifying at trial or hearing, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Acte r) 1(1Xc), Fla. Stat. (2017). ich no exception + +argues the exhibit is not hearsay i 1%, t h will not introduce it to prove that sexual conduct with children is the i te f stealing a bagel. The "bagel" remark, however, would have no context without reeling statement. Again, the article quotes Epstein as saying: + +> I'm not a sexu tor, I'm an offender. It's the difference between a murde d a person who steals a bagel. + +> The at dvas supposedly committed in Florida is not a crime in + +discussed below, in addition to being classic hearsay, any reference to Epstein sexual conduct is irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial, and improper impeachment evidence. + +Knowing the hearsay hurdle, claims he is not offering the article to prove the truth of the matter asserted. This begs what material fact this article tends to prove or disprove. See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. claims the article proves Epstein had a lack of remorse for the underlying crimes. Disregarding, the lack of context provided and the reputation for sensationalism of the tabloid purporting to quote Epstein, at best, the quoted statement might be argued to suggest a lack of remorse for Epstein's plea to procurement of AD. However, it has no relevance to whether Epstein had probable cause to file his Complaint against . Therefore, the above statements purportedly made by Epstein to the New York Post should not and cannot A' come in. + +Alternatively, argues the statements are admissions of a ppt p oftent and thus admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. (Mot. at I 14). Thi also fails for the above reason that the article would not be an admission to an el ) t i is case (such as, lack of probable cause or malice), but relates solely to the single (;e , 0se o which the statements relate, which is not being litigated in this action and forecl S resentation to a jury. + +Additionally, admission of this tabloi e uld violate the best evidence rule. See Dollar v. State, 685 So. 2d 901, 90 la. DCA 1996) (newspaper article containing defendant's statements to reporter I hearsay without trial testimony of reporter, because "[t]he defendant was denied anC ity for cross examination"). Just like in Dollar: + +> The probl is case is that the reporter [will] not testify at trial as to hat allegedly] said to [her]. Clearly, this would [be] th t evid nee of what [Epstein] had said and such live testimony . afford[] [Epstein] an opportunity to cross-examine the er as to the reporter's accurac y and recollection as well as relevant matters. Instead, [ I] simply [seeks to] traduce[] an out of court writing generated by the reporter recounting what [Epstein] had told [her]. + +Id. at 902-03 [emphasis added]. This denial of any opportunity for Epstein to cross examine the New York Post reporter mandates a ruling that the article is inadmissible. See id. at 903 + +Furthermore, any argument that the contents of the article are admissible because a newspaper is self-authenticating "misses the mark." Dollar, 685 So. 2d at 903. "Authentication relates to the genuineness vel non of a document. No one hem seriously disputes the fact that the article in question was published in a [known] newspaper ... Authentication, however, does not mean that the article is insulated from other rules of evidence governing admissibility." Id. (internal citations omitted). + +In short, the newspaper article is inadmissible hearsay to which no exception applies. Thus, it cannot come in. ts, + +### Exhibit #I32 is Irrelevant + +argues the newspaper article is relevant to the puniti claim because it "tends to prove that Epstein lacked remorse for the under' and that, "even after pleading guilty to criminal charges Epstein continues to i n hi it." (Mot. at 1 6) (emphasis added). But criminal conduct is not at i Ss t , civil case! Rather, the purported wrongful conduct alleged by in his • is malicious prosecution. If this Court concludes that the newspaper article sho lac f remorse, then to what is the lack of remorse directed? n NO! Epste s oted as saying, "If I had only brought my lawsuit against Rothstein and Edwa w York — I could not have been sued for malicious prosecution." Even as sp = e New York Post, the quoted language indicates nothing about Epstein's attitude arils let alone a lack of remorse for suing him. + +ant, evidence must tend to prove or disprove a material fact." Thigpen v. Unite JServs., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Epstein's guilty plea from nearly a decade ago, or his purported denial of guilt after entering a plea, has no bearing on any of the issues for trial as framed by the pleadings in this lawsuit. The pleadings in this lawsuit include: (1) Epstein's Complaint for damages against Defendant Scott Rothstein and (2) Counterclaim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +Furthermore, the cases cited by position. First, are completely inapposite and do not support his cites to the dissenting opinion in a tobacco case, R.J. Tobacco Co. v. Calloway, 201 So. 3d 753, 768 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (Taylor, J., dissenting). Not only does cite to the dissenting opinion in Calloway, but the proposition he cites to comes from a Texas case. See id. (citing Ellis Cty. State Bank v. Keever, 936 S.W. 2d 683, 688-89 (Tex. App. 1996) for the proposition that, "whether the defendant showed remorse is a facto termining an appropriate punitive damages award"). Notably, the majority opini itma••) loway favors Epstein's position. See id. at 760 (emphasis added) ("Despite plainti c n to the contrary, an argument that the jury should punish a defendant for defend' trial or failing to admit responsibility is well outside the bounds of proper advoc5c1., + +Next, cites an inapposite asbestos feSe, -Manville Sales Corp. v. Janssens, 463 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Johns- ales Corp. lists several factors (taken from another dissenting opinion3) and the that the "factors appear to be reasonable considerations in aggravation or ACLraelof punitive damages and, in most respects, are consistent with existing Floriddeeci#i ns on punitive damages." Id. at 248 (emphasis added). These factors, which con ranufacturers and marketing misconduct are clearly inapplicable to the case at bar shout not be considered by this Court: + +> e amount of the plaintiff's litigation expenses; (2) the in usness of the hazard to the public, (3) the profitability of the arketing misconduct (increased by an appropriate multiple); (4) the attitude and conduct of the enterprise upon discovery of the misconduct; (5) the degree of the manufacturer's awareness of the hazard and of its excessiveness; (6) the number and level of employees involved in causing or covering up the marketing misconduct; (7) the duration of both the improper marketing behavior and its cover-up; (8) the financial condition of the enterprise and the probable effect thereon of a particular judgment; + +Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430, 445 n.14 (Fla. 1978) (M, J. dissenting). + +and (9) the total punishment the enterprise will probably receive from other sources. + +Id. attempt to apply these factors to the instant case is nonsensical. + +#### Exhibit #132 is Unfairly Prejudicial + +Even if the New York Post article were relevant to proving a material fact at trial, any such relevance is tenuous at best, and even "[r]elevant evidence is inadmissible if its prob ve value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of iss • r] isleading the jury." § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017). Whatever probative value the articl ssibly have is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to Epstein, we as the likelihood that it would confuse the true issues in this lawsuit and mislead to the subject of the claims being tried. Again, this is not a civil case regarding d \ a: , who was never even a client of . It is a malicious prosecution actio ict, t only by connection Epstein's attitude about an offe ain AD in 2005 for which he was convicted and served a sentence has to the lawsuit Whatever tenuous against in 2009 for Mil litigation tactics in 2009 is substantially o C et d y the undue prejudice and confusion this would create in this action. See State v. Page, o. 2d 813, 816 (Fla. 1984) ("[S]ection 90.403 of the evidence code enables the tri co to xclude evidence of prior convictions, even though relevant, if the probative val • su ntially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice."). See also Kelley v. Mutnic . 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (generally, "evidence of prior convictions, acquittals arrest is irrelevant in a civil action and thus inadmissible," except where "[the defendant] himself had already inserted this subject into the proceedings by testifying that he had been found not guilty of the criminal [ ] charges against him and that the case had been dismissed"). + +Finally, contends that Epstein's alleged and unconfirmed comparison of procurement of a minor to "stealing a bagel," and Epstein's alleged questioning of the illegality of such conduct "evinc[e] a total lack of remorse on the part of Epstein." (Mot. at 1 12). Again, remorse or alleged lack thereof for any criminal conduct purportedly committed by Epstein against AD, a non- ' client, is wholly irrelevant to the claims being tried. + +### Exhibit #132 is Improper Character Evidence + +Additionally, the newspaper article is inadmissible under sections 90.404 and 90.405, Florida Statutes, because its only purpose is to disparage Epstein's character. Fl w is clear that "[e]vidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmi rovesaction in conformity with it on a particular occasion" except under certain limi c ccs not present here. § 90.404(1), Fla. Stat. (2017); see also § 90.405(2), Fla. AO (2 ("When character or a made of specific instances of that person's conduct.' m added). Here, Epstein's purported trait of character of a person is an essential element of a c a gs) nu, or defense, proof may be \S y statements to the New York Post are irrelevan;c • at trial and would serve only to portray i ts ihs " him in a negative light. + +### Exhibit #132 Contains Im eachment I:vidence + +References to Epstein g a xual offender," and to his commission of a sexual "crime" are also inadmissible un ions 90.609 and 90.610, Florida Statutes. Such references are inadmissible as t elevant to Epstein's truthfulness and go far beyond the bare fact he entered a p ment.4 See § 90.609, Fla. Stat. (2017) (character evidence used to impeach a witn fer only to character relating to truthfulness"). + +While section 90.610 permits a party to impeach a witness by evidence if the witness was convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, Epstein's designation as a sexual offender + +4 Even the fact that Epstein entered a plea agreement is irrelevant, as there are often reasons other than guilt which prompt an accused person to enter a guilty plea. + +falls outside this narrow category of impeachment evidence by addressing the nature of his crime (a sexual offense). Impeachment under section 90.610 is strictly limited to the fact the witness was convicted of a felony or crime involving dishonesty, and the number of convictions. Further details, including the nature of the crime, are off limits. See Rogers v. State, 964 So. 2d 221, 222- 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (11)mpeachment by prior convictions is restricted to dete tag if the witness has previously been convicted of a crime, and if so, how many times. tion and internal quotation marks omitted); Botte v. Pomeroy, 497 So. 2d 1275, 128 DCA 1986) ("[Q]uestioning is limited to whether the witness has ever been cony' t felony or a crime involving dishonesty. . . . The witness may be required to giv Ac nutter t of convictions, but if he answers truthfully, no further questions may be asked t lar, the nature of the crimes not be elicited.")(emphasis added; internal cite s s i ); Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1346, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) rmit th elicitation of the nature of the crime, additional light on his credibility would not compensate for the possible preju on the minds of the jurors.") (emphasis added). + +#### Epstein's Purported Statements Do Not Reflect Lack of Remorse. Rather, They Constitute Statements of-Frict Reflectin2 Differences Between Florida and New York Law + +MI e c ck ofremorse" argument is unavailing. Again, in the article, Epstein is allegedly aying: + +'m not a sexual predator, I'm an offender. It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel. + +The crime that was supposedly committed in Florida is not a crime in New York. + +On their face, the statements as purportedly quoted by the New York Post reflect not a lack of remorse, but factual differences that were reported in the most sensational manner possible at + +the time, between New York and Florida law regarding solicitation of a minor for prostitution. In Florida, the crime was a felony, while only a misdemeanor offense in New York. + +In Florida, when the subject article was written, procuring for prostitution, or causing to be prostituted, a person under age 18, was a second-degree felony. § 796.03, Fla. Stat. (2011). In New York, solicitation of a prostitute age 16 or older constituted "patronizing a person for prostitution in the third degree," a class A misdemeanor. See N.Y. Penal Law § 230.04. For point of reference, other class A misdemeanors in New York include: p •y (§ 155.25), criminal trespass in the second degree (§ 140.15), and possession o tools (§ 140.35). Thus, despite the way it sounds, solicitation of a minor prostitut • ork was the same level of offense as petty larceny, such as stealing a bagel, and p i,) ha o the same degree. + +Furthermore, in Florida there are two types o on — a "sexual predator" (§ 775.21, it Fla. Stat.) or a "sexual offender" (if 943.0435 r 985.481, Fla. Stat.). Sexual predators in Florida are those who have been convi of a t-degree felony sex crime or multiple seconddegree felony sex crimes. This s' of apply to Epstein. Rather, Epstein is registered as a "sexual offender" as the artic + +In short, when context, Epstein's purported statements do not reflect a lack of remorse. Rather en on their face, they constitute statements of fact reflecting differences between Flo New York law. Even assuming the statement was quoted accurately, it shows no mo trying to help a reporter to understand the difference between the two types of classifications. + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the plethora of reasons set forth in this response, Epstein respectfully requests that Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Trial Exhibit # 132 be denied. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the a Service List below on February 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing po Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). list zI on the ant to Florida + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach evard, Suite 301 West Palm Bea 33401 (561) 727-3 27-3601 [fa] + +L (FBN 602991) rard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) a M. Many (FBN 26680) mary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linIcrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

████ J. ████
████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
████ J. ████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +METRO + +# **Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator** + +By Amber Sutherland + +February 25, 2011 | 5:00am + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_16_Picture_2.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein David McGlynn + +Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making wisecracks about his Just-ended Jail stint for having sex with an underage girl. + +'I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender; " the financier told The Post yesterday. + +"It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel," said Epstein. + +Epstein's flippant reasoning aside, a New York Judge ruled at a hearing last month that the moneyman is the most dangerous kind of sex offender: a Level 3. + +Epstein recently returned to his \$50 million East 71st Street mansion and celebrated his release from a Florida Jail with his close pal, Britain's Prince Andrew. + +Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence for sdiciting a minor for prostitution. + +In court papers, the victim was identified as a 14-year-old girl. + +At one point. Epstein was facing 10 years to life on multiple counts of statutory rape, according to Investigators. Court documents in that case claimed he routinely sought out girls as young as 14 and paid them \$20O to \$1,000 for sexual massages in his homes In Palm Beach, Fla.. and Manhattan. + +He also molested girls he had brought in from South America and Europe and once was given three 12-year from France as a "birthday gift." the documents alleged. + +Epstein struck a secret nonprosecution deal with the feds. The government agreed to drop its pro ex-crime allegations If Epstein copped to prostitution felonies in Florida state court. + +But in New York's sex-offender database, Epstein doesn't come up in a ZIP code search. He s only via the -name search" option, and no New York address is listed. + +That's because Epstein's Upper East Side home is considered "temporary." By s required to provide only his permanent address to the database, and Epstein listed his Florida home. + +Ftecommenclod by + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOLUO 7 + +## TRANSC Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +his assets. THE COURT: And I think I deferred on that. If I didn't, that's the way I'm going to deal with it. + +ork) AmAr (PostHretiolUT)(BirlionafMrArf-M70lgpsOnliT) Cn n (257)(20117) (6-tferideTP (not)(:) (p r eda &ip + +MR. SCAROLA: These are direc qu tes from Mr. Epstein. It's the a e in which he compares the abuse inf pon children as the equiva stealing a bagel. + +THE COURT: ns rn statement out of court being g o prove the truth of the matter a + +SCAROLA: No, sir. Being used to p ; e tjte fact that the statement was made, (:g 4I e g used to prove the state of the peaker's mind, and being used for purposes of the jury's assessment of punitive damages. + +We don't contend that molesting children is the equivalent of stealing a bagel. + +1 If we were introducing this statement + 2 to prove the truth of the matter asserted, + 3 we would be advocating that molesting a + 4 child is the equivalent of stealing a bagel. + +5 THE COURT: No. I'm not sure that's + 6 the way that the hearsay rule is + 7 implemented. + +8 Ms. Rockenbach, your position? + +9 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. We did + 10 raise hearsay. (we) (raised) (relevance). (we) + (11) (raised) (probative) (value) (substantially) + (12) (outweighed) (by) (the) (danger) (or) (unfair) + (13) (prejudice), (confusion), (misleading) (the) (jury), + (14) (as) (well) (as) (hearsay) (and) (authenticity). + +15 (This) (is) (a) (very) (good) (example) (of) (an) + (16) (inflammatory) (exhibit) (by) (Mr.) ([REDACTED]) (and) (it) + (17) (seeks) (to) (try) (to) (prove), (I) (guess), (that) (my) + (18) (client) (is) (a) (bad) (person) (or) (bad) (character) + (19) (evidence) (under) (90.404). (This) (is) (hearsay) (and) + (20) (it) (should) (not) (be) (admitted). (It) (would) (be) + (21) (inflammatory) (and) (very) (prejudicial) (to) (my) + (22) (client). + +23 THE COURT: Any request for admissions + 24 sent out in response to that article? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: There may have been. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 There certainly were deposition questions concerning whether Mr. Epstein made statements to any third party regarding any of his molestation claims, and he asserted the Fifth Amendment with regard to those. So we would have the benefit of an adverse inference in that regard. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 And the statement of a party opp is not a hearsay statement. I'm s rry There's an exception to the h y rule for the statement of a party But it also goes to state of nd clearly the offender's attitud the offense he committed is hi p levant in a punitive damages cla' rj 4a0 + +16 17 18 19 20 THE OU I recognize the party oppo nt issue. Again, its application is o con rn to me in this particular context the information comes from a ewspaper. + +21 GO (23) (EigalwourdITWOQ2MIKE@VITTM@ED(rrl are (L1) can (set)(th-ft)(al)(Ctie)(same) (Carrie)(L) @g5ino to set CI—t Wither ) (issue) (5557.1t)the gith-Fl)(Thret 1ms .1.) (in firnation.) + +25 MR. SCAROLA: I can assure you that, if + +Mr. Epstein does show up for trial, one of the very first questions I'm going to ask him is, Did you make this statement to the New York newspaper? + +(THE)(COURT? (Take)a) (said?05 (Wnn)(take) (that CID when time (comes) We can (nItCh6T) (discuss )(the)(515Worions)(St) (CITe) are (same) @ITU\_ ir g) (..D), elM (discussing) s cus s iTiE)(2-m ci (settlement)(agreements, (11'9) (Aan) (time we + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank y our Honor. THE COURT: Thanks a our court reporter for staying a this, as we have, ng through + +MR. SCAROlc I ssume that we are going to de i i p7meFifth Amendment issues the firs issuY when we reconvene? as + +CO RT: Well, I thought we talked ose already. + +MR. SCAROLA: No, no. You remember at I identified every question and answer? + +THE COURT: You are talking about the individual questions and answers. Yes, sir. Absolutely. And we will take those up first, and then we will go to the motions to compel and motion for protective order, if + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg) + +Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz + +Complaint + +General with the U.S.: Justice Department and as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. + +PAUL G. CASSELL was sworn in as a U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Utah in July of 2002 and served in that position for over 5 years before turning his full time attention to crime victims' rights and criminal justice reform. + +5. PAUL G. CASSELL has at all material times enjoyed a highly favorable national reputation particularly related to his crime victims' rights work. + +PAUL G. CASSELL has served as co-counsel with BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] in representing the interests of multiple victims of billionaire serial child abuser, Jeffrey Epstein, including in particular a pending action in Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida under the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) which challenges the legality of a secret deal that immunized Jeffrey Epstein and associates of Epstein from federal criminal prosecution despite evidence that Epstein had sexually assaulted over 40 female minors on hundreds of occasions with the active help and participation of multiple associates. + +7. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS is a resident of Broward County, Florida is sui juris and is and at all times material hereto has been an attorney duly licensed to practice law and regularly engaged in the practice of law throughout the State of Florida and beyond. + +8. Despite having previously been the victim of character assassination by the Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S associate and client, Jeffrey Epstein, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS enjoys a highly favorable national reputation particularly related to his work in defending the rights of child victims of sexual abuse. + +[REDACTED] and Cassell v. Dershowitz +Complaint + +9. Before entering the private practice of law, [REDACTED] JEDWARDS was a trial attorney at the Broward County State Attorney's Office responsible for the prosecution of many major and violent crimes. He is a Florida Bar Board Certified Civil Trial Attorney who has tried dozens of jury trials. + +[REDACTED] has been profiled in *The Best Lawyers in America* and recognized by the National Trial Lawyers Association by inclusion in its "Top 40" Under 40 listing. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] professional peers have given him a Martindale-Hubbell rating of "AV" attesting to the highest level of professional excellence and unquestionable ethics. + +10. BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] has been actively involved for the better part of the last decade in representing multiple victims of the billionaire, serial child abuser, Jeffrey Epstein. + +11. Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, upon information and belief is a resident of the State of Florida and is sui juris. + +12. Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, is an attorney whose involvement in multiple high-profile legal matters has enabled him to command easy access to mass media news sources. + +13. Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, was one of a very large team of lawyers involved in defending Jeffrey Epstein during his criminal investigation, and according to DERSHOWITZ's own public statements, DERSHOWITZ was responsible for negotiating Epstein's secret deal with the federal government which afforded protection not only to Epstein but to various of his associates as well. + +Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz +Complaint + +14. In fulfillment of their obligations to two Epstein-victim clients: [REDACTED] J. + +[REDACTED] and PAUL G. CASSELL filed and have been aggressively prosecuting a legal action in the Federal District Court as previously described in Paragraph 6. + +15. BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] and PAUL G. CASSELL on behalf of two additional + +Epstein-victim clients sought the agreement of the federal government to permit those clients to intervene in the already pending CVRA action. The government declined to agree to the intervention; thus requiring [REDACTED] and CASSELL to file legal pleadings seeking a Court Order permitting intervention on the basis of specifically alleged factual allegations. + +16. Among the factual allegations made by EDWARDS and CASSELL were allegations that Defendant, DERSHOWITZ, had knowledge of and participation in Epstein's criminal conduct. + +17. Immediately following the filing of what the Defendant, DERSHOWITZ, knew to be an entirely proper and well-founded pleading, DERSHOWITZ initiated a massive public media assault on the reputation and character of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL accusing them of intentionally lying in their filing of having leveled knowingly false accusations against the Defendant, DERSHOWITZ, without ever conducting any investigation of the credibility of the accusations, and of having acted unethically to the extent that their willful misconduct warranted and required disbarment. + +18. The details of Defendant, DERSHOWITZ'S character assassination [REDACTED] and PAUL G. CASSELL are typified by the contents of the CNN interview available to be accessed on the internet at: + +[Redacted] + +and Cassell v. Dershowitz + +Complaint + + + +That interview is incorporated herein; by reference. + +The same or substantially identical accusations of deliberate misconduct and unethical behavior warranting disbarment of the Plaintiffs were repeated by the Defendant, + +DERSHOWITZ, in multiple nationally televised interviews, in statements to and repeated by national and international print news sources, and various other forms nationally and internationally. + +The Defendant, DERSHOWITZ'S statements were false and known by him to be false at the time they were made. DERSHOWITZ was speaking from his Miami residence at the time he made the false and defamatory statements. + +Alternatively, DERSHOWITZ made the statements in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity, intending that the statements would provide support for DERSHOWITZ'S false + +protestations of his own innocence and direct attention away from DERSHOWITZ'S personal knowledge of and involvement in Epstein's criminal conduct and the subsequent cover up of that misconduct. + +DERSHOWITZ'S statements were and are defamatory per se directly attacking the fitness of the Plaintiffs to engage in the honored profession of the practice of law. + +DERSHOWITZ acted in willful, wanton, reckless, and intentional disregard of the rights of the Plaintiffs and under such circumstances as to warrant the imposition of punitive damages. + +24: As the statements made by DERSHOWITZ are defamatory per se, injury to the Plaintiffs is presumed as a matter of law. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, for compensatory damages, costs, pre- and post-judgment interest, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the circumstances. Plaintiffs reserve the right to assert claims for punitive damages upon satisfying the applicable statutory prerequisites. + +Plaintiffs further demand trial by jury. + +Dated this 6/7/ day of January, 2015. + +JACK SCAROLA + Florida Bar No.: 1694400 + Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and: mep@searcylaw.com + Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + Searcy Denney Scarola-Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + Phone: (561) 686-6300 + Fax: (561) 383-9451 + Attorneys for Plaintiffs + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Filing # 40060177 E-Filed:04/08/2016 04:51:56 PM + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: CACE:15-000072 + +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, + +Plaintiff, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant, + +**NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT** + +Plaintiffs, [REDACTED] Cassell, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the terms of the confidential settlement agreement and mutual release between the parties to this action, do hereby give notice of the withdrawal of the motion for partial summary judgment they filed in this lawsuit and all supporting documents. + +In the event that the noticed withdrawal is determined to be subject to Court approval, the Plaintiffs would show in support of this notice that [REDACTED] and Cassell continue to represent Virginia Giuffre in separate pending matters, and shall continue to advance her legitimate legal interests in those matters. As expressly understood by the parties upon the execution of the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, [REDACTED] reaffirms her allegations, and the withdrawal of the referenced filings is not intended to be, and should not be construed as being an acknowledgement by Edwards and Cassell that the allegations made [REDACTED] were mistaken. [REDACTED] and Cassell do acknowledge that the public filing in the Crime Victims + +Rights Act case of their client's allegations against Defendant Dershowitz became a major distraction from the merits of the well-founded Crime Victims. Rights Act case by causing delay and, as a consequence, turned out to have been a tactical mistake. For that reason, Edwards and Cassell have chosen to withdraw the referenced filing as a condition of settlement. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of APRIL, 2016. + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mcp@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Edwards and Cassell + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Sigrid [REDACTED] McCawley, Esquire +smccawley@bsfllp.com; +sperkins@bsfllp.com; ftleserve@bsfllp.com + +Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP +401 E Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 356-0011 + +Bruce S. Rogow, Esquire +Bruce S. Rogow, P.A. +100 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 1000 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 767-8909 +Fax: (954) 764-1530 +Attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz + +Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire +Thomas.scott@csklegal.com; +Steven.safra@csklegal.com; +Renee.nail@csklegal.com; +shelly.zambo@csklegal.com +Cole Scott & Kissane P.A. +9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400 +Miami, FL 33156 +Phone: (305) 350-5329 +Fax: (305) 373-2294 +Attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com; +brad@pathtojustice.com; +maria@pathtojustice.com + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing, Edwards Fistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire +ksweder@sweder-ross.com +Sweder & [REDACTED], LLP +131 Oliver Street +Boston, [REDACTED] 02110 +Phone: (617) 646-4466 +Fax: (617) 646-4470 +Attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz + +Ashley Eiler, Esquire +AEiler@wileyrein.com +Mary E. Borja, Esquire +MBorja@wileyrein.com +Richard A. Simpson, Esquire +RSimpson@wileyrein.com +Wiley Rein, LLP +1776 K Street NW +Washington, DC 20006 +Phone: (202) 719-4252 +Fax: (202) 719-7049 +Attorneys for Alan M. Dershowitz \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5fff5aa22c41adfe5aa19fead0c492511acef878 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317/EFTA02764317.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1625 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764317.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 35, + "chars": 43582, + "elapsed_seconds": 231.69, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_16_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRESPONSE \nTHE ADMI \nY EPSTEIN'S \nOUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nADDRESSING \n132", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.608, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 499.42633056640625, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 499.42633056640625, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 112.608, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.8191223144531, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.8191223144531, + 491.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 491.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INT4.140N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 403.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 403.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 389.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 389.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit #132 Constitutes Inadmissible Hearsay and Lacks Releva", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 251.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 251.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit #I32 is Irrelevant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 238.30224609375, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 238.30224609375, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit #132 is Unfairly Prejudicial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 140.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 290.0826110839844, + 140.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 290.0826110839844, + 155.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 155.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit #132 is Improper Character Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 340.71881103515625, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 340.71881103515625, + 169.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 169.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit #132 Contains Im eachment I:vidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 392.0931396484375, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 392.0931396484375, + 444.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 444.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Purported Statements Do Not Reflect Lack of Remorse. Rather, They \nConstitute Statements of-Frict Reflectin2 Differences Between Florida and New York \nLaw", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 543.7139892578125, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 543.7139892578125, + 500.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 500.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 388.94989013671875, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 388.94989013671875, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 32.436, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 32.436, + 157.95 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC nd day of Sept, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copies furnished: + +![]()![]()Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764352/EFTA02764352.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764352/EFTA02764352.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7396ef081952602603f9f422ac7431abddac1aea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764352/EFTA02764352.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764352.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1679, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 333.84000000000003, + 129.89 + ], + [ + 554.046, + 129.89 + ], + [ + 554.046, + 171.79 + ], + [ + 333.84000000000003, + 171.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.00799999999998, + 369.558 + ], + [ + 427.57200000000006, + 369.558 + ], + [ + 427.57200000000006, + 397.212 + ], + [ + 208.00799999999998, + 397.212 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764352" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78e4ec396cc22c6c96453666086136703c517a5f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.md @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., ,individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +## RE-NOTICE OF + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED following: ersigned has called up for hearing the + +DATE: February 6, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admissions + +X Movan►'s **attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised** + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2nd day of Feb., 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Fax; (954)-745-3556 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +O 'S iS 4)9 ? S" C4 SLe + +"1f you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Picase contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, Dame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Id enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanprí kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen 4 wot,m ..y pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +fiu.) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6def7842069c21b46ebc9700cb8ea181d8266baa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354/EFTA02764354.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764354.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4805, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 378.216, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 378.216, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 281.25848388671875, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 281.25848388671875, + 575.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 575.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764354" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca49bf41baadbee650577561ae9184db223e6675 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +I + +## NOTICE OF H + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED following: ersigned has called up for hearing the + +DATE: February 12, 2018 TIME: 8:45 a.m. JUDGE: PLACE: ROOM #: 10-D Honorable Donald Hafele 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +M' Motion to Lift Confidential Designation + +X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effert to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoinf ant via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 13 day of + ++ok + +JAGS ARO A + +Flo No.: 169440 + +ey E-Mail: jsxqsearcvlaw.com; and + +cann@searcylaw.com + +rumary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +earcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-3 S151 + +Attorneys for J. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +e , J. Esquire staff.efil®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-524-2822 C )O 1 Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire West Palm Beach, FL 33401 "S C) jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S. Suite 1400 Phone: (561}659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +?S' Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FI p i.aw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for + +Berard Rocl ei ch, Esquire kara@linkroc. : , tbermudez®flacivi aw.com Link & R k P.A. 1555 P es Blvd., Suite 301 West h, FL 33409 Phone: (56 727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scottginkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/2 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46e77db1429d99c77532121874f103451eee4eb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359/EFTA02764359.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764359.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4640, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.2593994140625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.2593994140625, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 359.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 359.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 561.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 280.87847900390625, + 561.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 280.87847900390625, + 576.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 576.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 354.1312561035156, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 354.1312561035156, + 147.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 147.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764359" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c97dcee2bff383b2340f89292877b70efa3cee96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. , individually, and L.M., individually, os- + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: February 21, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Second Supplement to Motion in Liminc Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +[redacted] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +   X    *Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised.* + +           *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +           *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2ND day of Feb , 2018. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: . jsx@searcylaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: .scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [redacted] J. [redacted] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Esquire 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 staftefile®pathtojustice.com Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"S C) + +?S' Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®F A eLaw.com Railroad Suite 50 Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for + +Kara Berard Esquire kara@li tbennudez@flacivillaw.com Link & R P.A. 1555 P Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West P h, FL 33409 Phone: (56 727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina®linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attomeys for Jeffrey Epstein + +AS" + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire CO marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein iS 4)9 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the lime before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." AiseS + +"Si usted es una persona minusvélida que necesita algún acomodamiepara poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por b menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada pan su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificacién si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, (lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim Id bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou ge woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +O \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91c0619bde4d4a13f67d71ad6f17a9f1976fb8a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364/EFTA02764364.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764364.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4603, + "elapsed_seconds": 110.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 282.75848388671875, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 282.75848388671875, + 580.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 580.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.0328369140625, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.0328369140625, + 151.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 151.67999267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764364" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a996242441eab27860a7a9753ace562dc0c63c80 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.md @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +I + +## NOTICE OF HEAS ) + +04 + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t %undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: February 28, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie, Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: I0-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlement Agreements + +X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2nd day of Feb., 2018. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linIcrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; t Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Kara@linkrocklaw.com; ina@linkrocklaw.com cos + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou a peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gegpwoblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +t..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d3700fbc4a09a577be53c1c28c86404bc17d648 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369/EFTA02764369.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764369.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4792, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEAS )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 375.26934814453125, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 375.26934814453125, + 359.60302734375 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 359.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.7877197265625, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.7877197265625, + 575.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 575.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764369" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0c2509b414ce20fbedb3301e979622e332d3683 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTErN individually, and + +J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JJEFA%EJ EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO COMPEL E.A.#1O,rNSWER OUESTIONS RELATING TO THE CRIMES VICTIMS' TS /ACT AND TO REOPEN DEPOS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey "Epstein"), hereby supplements his Motion to Compel E.W. to Answer Questions the Crimes Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen Deposition and states: + +- 1. At a uniform m endar hearing held on January 31, 2018, the Court denied reopening discovery to t depositions of L.M. and Jane Doe, but left the continuation of E.W.'s depositio n for future ruling. +- 2. . is incarcerated at the Gadsden Correctional Facility. Her current release date is Oettlit4,'2018. +- 3. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310(a), if a person is confined in prison, the Court must grant leave to take the deposition. +- 4. Epstein's counsel has contacted the Gadsden Correctional Facility to obtain permission to take the continued deposition of E.W. should the Court grant Epstein's Motion. + +Officer has stated that an in-person deposition will be allowed with seven to ten business days' written notice. + +5. and Epstein's counsel are available for E.W.'s deposition on February 26, 2018, should the Court allow it, which provides sufficient time to advise Gadsden Correctional Facility. + +Accordingly, Epstein requests that his Motion be granted as set forth in l onse to Motion for Protective Order and Epstein's Motion to Compel E. er Questions Relating to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen DepositionC + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC + +I certify that the foregoing document has been sh the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 2, 2018, through the,to s ling portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + ++6s + +OCKENBACH, PA 15Pirrn Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 alm Beach, Florida 33401 1) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: KaraQIinkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaiglinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina©Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

CERTIFIED LOGO

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73270cd2f3371083f88de319a406b49c1b6757aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374/EFTA02764374.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764374.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 7167, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JJEFA%EJ EPSTEIN'S \nSUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO COMPEL E.A.#1O,rNSWER OUESTIONS \nRELATING TO THE CRIMES VICTIMS' TS /ACT AND TO REOPEN \nDEPOS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 511.3138427734375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 511.3138427734375, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 307.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 307.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764374" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..468309b2de5cca01b85362c92848be704c12010e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.md @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +LEAVE TO PROPOUND LIM reviewed the file and being full THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon J. MOTION FOR JESTS FOR ADMISSION, and the Court having in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 4/4\_e ptiaze..;.7 Ar - 7, rta-ifi-oxj14 L4-e c?e, a( 11 .4 + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintifgs), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## ORDER ON MOTION FOR LeV PROPOUND LIMITED REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION + +DOt/ N.ND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this + +ALD HAFELE CULT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@scarcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6551451411e74d1732c37e49800243143da9c34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377/EFTA02764377.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764377.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2767, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.56, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION FOR LeV PROPOUND \nLIMITED REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.4891357421875, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.4891357421875, + 381.363037109375 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 381.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 171.71999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764377" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06d4cfb4d73e08ee9fc958a07bde21a3f644073f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ps + +## ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND GRANTING EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL E.W. TO ANSWER QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE CRIMES VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND TO REOPEN DEPOSITION + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on February 7, 2018, on the Courts Uniform Motion Calendar upon (I) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff (Edward) October 26, 2017, Motion for Protective Order [D.E. 1026; D.E. 1027]; (2) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's (Epsteid) January 10, 2018, Response in Opposition to Motion for Protective Orderand Epstein's Motion to Compel E.W. to Answer Questions Relating to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen Deposition [D.E. 1141]; and (3) January 12, 2018, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel E.W. to Answer Questions Relating to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and to Reopen Discovery [D.E. 1143]. The Court, having reviewed the partied respective filings, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Motion is DENIED and Epstein's Motion is GRANTED. Discovery is reopened to allow Epstein to continue the deposition of E.W. both as + +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]* +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order Denying [REDACTED]'s Motion for Protective Order +and Granting Epstein's Motion to Compel E.W. to +Answer Questions Relating to the Crimes Victims' +Rights Act and to Reopen Deposition +Page 2 + +to the Crime Victims' Rights Act action and follow up as well as other questions that are relevant +to this proceeding. E.W. shall answer the questions posed to her relating to the Crime Victims' +Rights Act. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310, the Court grants leave to take +E.W.'s deposition at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in accordance with the facility's guidelines + +and requirements. **ALL PARTIES BRADLEY EDWARDS AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT +SHALL BE PROPERLY NOTICED OF THIS DEPOSITION.** + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 7 day +of February, 2018. + +![]()**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]* +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order Denying [REDACTED]'s Motion for Protective Order +and Granting Epstein's Motion to Compel E.W. to +Answer Questions Relating to the Crimes Victims' +Rights Act and to Reopen Deposition +Page 3 + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tanya@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tanya@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8760240449880d9f629eb48699470d686a07059 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380/EFTA02764380.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764380.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6104, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE \nORDER AND GRANTING EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL E.W. TO \nANSWER QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE CRIMES VICTIMS' \nRIGHTS ACT AND TO REOPEN DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 494.6131896972656, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 494.6131896972656, + 366.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 366.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 441.45000000000005 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764380" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72e64f9d7527b75531d4b9785594a24f025863fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.md @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +raS + +## GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMELY COMPOSITE EXHIBITS + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. M, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this General Objections to Untimely Composite Exhibitt, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. At the December 5, 2017 special-set hearing, the Court ordered Counter-Plaintiff to produce copies of any exhibits that had not previously been produced by no later than December ( 20, 2017. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219, 226, 228). +- 2. That ruling memorialized in the Court's January 16, 2018 Order on PlaintifflCounter endant Jeffrey Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section B ( ,K 1 'bits), as follows: OTBI12/ efore December 20, 2017, shall produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial... + - 3. Yet on February 2, 2018, undersigned counsel received letter correspondence from + +Epstein's counsel, which enclosed a flash drive "containing additional documents for [Epstein]'s + +trial Exhibit Nos. 18, 35, 48, 323 and 324. We are still obtaining additional public records and will provide those to you upon our receipt." The numbered exhibits are `catch-ails' as follows: + +- a. #18 Court docket and all court filings referenced therein for L.M. v Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 50-2008-CA-028051; AA' +- b. #35 Court docket and all court filings referenced the ' .W. v. Jeffre Epstein, case no. 50-2008-CA-028058; +- c. #48 Court docket and all court filings reference th 2for Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-cv-80893; +- d. #323 All public records and t 8se e cles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adle iils , J. ME and any witnesses listed by either party; +- e. #324 All co QC s and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to s claims. + +4. e tests to all such late produced exhibits, whether contained in the February 2, 2018 flash drive or intended to be produced in the future, as violative of the Court's December 5, 2017 ruling and January 16, 2018 order. ii + +5. Additionally, the Court has previously ruled that, with regard to any "catch-all" exhibits listed on either party's exhibit list, the party must separately identify and list individually each exhibit sought to be relied upon by the listing party. + +6. therefore reserves all objections to all composite exhibits that fail to comply with this order by the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of February, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +NOTA CERTIFY + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +General Objection to Untimely Composite Exhibits +Page 5 of 5 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cec01abc06dde31d93f49e74d8ff7b947bbbc553 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383/EFTA02764383.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,276 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764383.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4514, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 110.60302734375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 110.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMELY COMPOSITE EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 489.9615173339844, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 489.9615173339844, + 341.60302734375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 341.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 142.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764383" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffc0e32798cd9138de5af886347c0c19d49baf41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.md @@ -0,0 +1,357 @@ +propounds the following Requests for A Procedure, requesting that Counter-De fa t t Jeffrey Epstein, admit the truth of the facts set forth as follows: Counter-Plaintiff, ugh undersigned counsel, hereby t to Rule 1.370 Florida Rules of Civil + +- 1. The printout of York State Sex Offender registration page attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' is authenti +- 2. a ormation contained in the printout of your New York State Sex Offender registratio • ched hereto as Exhibit 'A' is accurate. + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE tENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408002OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +# REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO COUNTER- QT JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +) O SA + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 611' day of February, 2018. + +Is/ Davin". "Vitale Tr. + +JACK SCAROLA ,0 Alk" Florida Bar No.: 169440 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx®searc om and mmccann®searcylaw.co Primary E-Mail: Scarola eam searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bead/takes Boulevard West Palm B c Florida 33409 Phone: (5 -6360 Fax: 451 cic)Attomy + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. . Esquire staff.efile®pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbwy Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbac P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, 50 West Palm Beach, 13k 33 Phone: (561)-72 Fax: Attorneys Epstein + +Scott uire Eservic ocIdaw.com; Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com; Kara®IinIcrocIdaw.com; Angela®IinkrocIdaw.com; Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com; tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epste + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquiici marc®nuriklaw.co + +One E Broward Fort Laud Phone: Fax: uite 700 , F1733301 -5849 3556 Scott Rothstein + +Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:24 AM + +Clipped from: + +![](_page_3_Picture_45.jpeg) + +Services + +News + +Government + +Local + +Q Search + +Location + +Translate + +Division of Criminal Justice Services + +Sex Offenders Missing Persons Community Resources Law Enforcement Newsroom + +Reference Statistics + +Anyone who uses this information to injure, harass or commit a criminal act against any person may be subject to criminal prosecution. + +Domiciled + +| Offender Id | 33216 | Race | [REDACTED] | +|-------------|------------------------|------------|----------------| +| Last Name | EPSTEIN | Ethnicity | Unknown | +| First Name | JEFFREY | Height | 6' 00" | +| Middle Name | E | Weight | 180 | +| DOB | Jan. 20, 1953 | Hair | Gray | +| Sex | Male | Eyes | Blue | +| Risk Level | 3 | Corr. Lens | | +| Designation | No Designation Applies | Photo Date | April 13, 2017 | + +More Photos + +Start Date 2/6/03 + Relocation Alerts Sign Up + Employee/Volunteer/ + Camp Searches + Disclaimer + FAQs + Information for Victims + Legal Information + Myths and Facts + Offender Counts by + County + Resource Links + Training + +**Civil Management** + FAQs + Flow Chart (pdf) + Law (pdf) + +Contact Registry/OSOM + +Current Addresses + +| Type | RES (Primary) | +|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| County | | +| Address | LITTLE ST JAMES
6100 RED HOOK QUARTER
B3
ST [REDACTED] Virgin Islands 00802 | + +View on Map + +| Type | RES (Secondary) | +|---------|------------------------------------------------| +| County | | +| Address | 355 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, Florida 33480 | + +View on Map + +| Type | RES (Secondary) | +|---------|------------------------------------| +| County | | +| Address | GREAT ST JAMES
, Virgin Islands | + +View on Map + +| Type | RES (Secondary) | +|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Country | France | +| Address | JEFFREY EPSTEIN
22 AVENUE FOCH APT 2DD
PARIS 75116
FRANCE | + +View on Map + +Type RES (Secondary) County New Yon( Address 9 E 71ST ST NEW YORK, flew York 10021.4102 + +Type RES (Secondary) County Address 49 ZORRO RANCH RO STANLEY, New Mexico 87056 + +Type EMP (Pnmary) County Address 6100 RED HOOK QUARTER 83 ST virgin islands 00802 + +## Law Enforcement Agency Having Jurisdiction E + +Virgin Islands Dept of Justice - Sex Offender Registry + +## Current Conviction + +| Title | Section | Subsection | Class | Category | Counts | Description | +|------------------------|------------|------------|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------| +| OUT | 0000000000 | 0000000 | U | F | 1 | Non-NYS Felony Sex Offense | +| Date of Crime | | | | July 23, 2006 | | | +| Date Convicted | | | | June 30, 2008 | | | +| Victim Sex/Age | | | | Female, 14 Years
Female, 16 Years
Female, Unknown | | | +| Arresting Agency | | | | Florida Dept of Law Enforcement - Sex Offender Registry | | | +| Offense Descriptions | | | | Sexual Intercourse
Deviate Sexual Intercourse
Sexual Contact | | | +| Relationship to Victim | | | | None Reported | | | +| Weapon Used | | | | None Reported | | | +| Force Used | | | | Detail unknown | | | +| Computer Used | | | | None Reported | | | +| Pornography Involved | | | | None Reported | | | +| Sentence | | | | Probation: 6 Month(s) Term: Time Served Unspecified | | | + +S + +## Previous Convicti squiring Registration a + +None Reported + +## Supervisin Information a + +None Repottedr + +## Special Conditions of Supervision E + +None Reported + +### Maximum Expiration Date/Post Release Supervision Date of Sentence: + +None Reported + +### Scars, Marks & Tattoos + +None Reported + +### Additional Names/Aliases + +EPSTEIN. JEFFREY EDWARD + +| Lic. Plate No. | State | Year | Make/Model | Color | +|----------------|---------|------|--------------------------|-------| +| HJGK55 | Florida | 2018 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | + +| VI3245C | Virgin Islands | 1985 | | | +|----------|----------------|------|----------------------------------|--| +| N212JE | New York | 2007 | Gulf
Stream Unknown | | +| VI5890TC | Virgin Islands | 2011 | | | +| IAAA32 | Florida | 2017 | Chevrolet Express Black | | +| HSU5212 | New York | 2017 | ██████ Mulsanne | | +| 3548TC | Virgin Islands | 1989 | | | +| HJGK55 | Florida | 2016 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | +| Y57AYH | Florida | 2015 | General Motor Corp. Yukon Black | | +| NHL381 | New Mexico | 2012 | Cadillac Escalade Black | | +| 3548TC | Virgin Islands | 1989 | | | +| NHL381 | New Mexico | 2012 | Cadillac Escalade Black | | +| Y57AYH | Florida | 2015 | General Motor Corp. Denall Black | | +| TEW896 | Virgin Islands | 2010 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | +| 4772TC | Virgin Islands | 2013 | | | +| HCP5713 | New York | 2015 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | +| TET575 | Virgin Islands | 2015 | General Motor Corp. Yukon Black | | +| NAL159 | New Mexico | 2015 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | +| 4641TC | Virgin Islands | 2012 | | | +| N120JE | New York | 1988 | | | +| N331JE | | 2001 | | | +| 522RZZ | New Mexico | 2013 | Ford Expedition Black | | +| TEM492 | Virgin Islands | 2013 | Dodge Caravan Black | | +| MLD718 | New Mexico | 2008 | Land Rover Range Rover Black | | +| CPK643 | New Mexico | 2007 | Hummer Hummer II Black | | +| NHL552 | New Mexico | 2002 | Mercedes-Benz 500 Series Black | | +| TED218 | Virgin Islands | 2010 | Chevrolet Suburban Black | | +| N908JE | Virgin Islands | 1968 | Aircraft Unknown | | +| 2583TC | Virgin Islands | 1968 | | | +| 2907TC | Virgin Islands | 2008 | | | +| 0730TC | Virgin Islands | 2006 | | | +| 4105TC | Virgin Islands | 2011 | | | +| 4106TC | Virgin Islands | 2011 | | | +| 2709TC | Virgin Islands | 1999 | | | + +**Division of Criminal Justice Services** + +| Community Resources | Law Enforcement | Newsroom | Reference | Language Assistance | +|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------| +| AMBER/Missing Child Alerts | Accreditation | Open Meetings / Webcasts | Criminal Justice Agency Directory | EspaÄtoi (Spanish) | +| | Crime Reporting | | | | +| Access Your Criminal History | Fingerprint Services | Press Releases | DCJS Employment | ä_ø-- (Chinese) | +| Crime Victims Assistance | Forensic Science / DNA | Contact DCJS | Drug Law Reform | Đ Ñ/ÑÑĐ*Đ_Đ' (Russian) | +| | Forms | About DCJS | Grants / Funding | Italiano (Italian) | +| | | | Legal Resources | | + +**Sexual Offense Kits** + +**Police Training** + +**Technology** + +**Ինթանի (Korean)** + +**Re-entry Initiatives** + +**Security Guard +Training** + +**Statistics** + +--- + +**CONNECT WITH US** + +--- + +**f FACEBOOK** + +**f FLICKR** + +**twitter TWITTER** + +**f YOUTUBE** + +![](_page_6_Picture_46.jpeg) + +Agencies + +App Directory + +Counties + +Events + +Programs + +Services + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:30 AM + +Clipped from: + +[http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha\\_challenge\\_field=03AA7ASh0gM2WSKVxAFDfgnU0xvxfV3bR5cOFKu\\_Qx1lk8gWpdfYN8eCef25Vi2uZWjqvbx6FZOPoQtOsVOa\\_10M3J24kfSloWeWWiD6NxJV02sOVxyx9ApFnKouLct4BQ1A5O8yidRETu6sYosNWH-sTeVH21weXCP9dK8K73Irgrx9wy-decbaU3GaDJ4htXToIUNXGDC1esxbkEltsMObOckUrZyhSZDg&recaptcha\\_response\\_field=camp+kream&Submit=Search](http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha_challenge_field=03AA7ASh0gM2WSKVxAFDfgnU0xvxfV3bR5cOFKu_Qx1lk8gWpdfYN8eCef25Vi2uZWjqvbx6FZOPoQtOsVOa_10M3J24kfSloWeWWiD6NxJV02sOVxyx9ApFnKouLct4BQ1A5O8yidRETu6sYosNWH-sTeVH21weXCP9dK8K73Irgrx9wy-decbaU3GaDJ4htXToIUNXGDC1esxbkEltsMObOckUrZyhSZDg&recaptcha_response_field=camp+kream&Submit=Search) + +![](_page_7_Picture_106.jpeg) + +Services News Government Local + +Offender + +| Division of Criminal Justice Services | | +|----------------------------------------------|------------------| +| Sex Offenders | Masking Partners | +| Community Resources | Low Endorsement | +| Attentions | Balance | +| Statistics | | + +**Offender Details** + +Anyone who was this information quite freed or control a control and against any person may be subject to channel protection + +**Denoticed** + +| Offender ID | 33216 | Race | White | +|-------------|------------------------|------------|----------------| +| Last Name | EPSTEIN | Ethnicity | Unknown | +| First Name | JEFFREY | Height | 8' 00" | +| Middle Name | E | Weight | 130 | +| DOB | JAN 20, 1953 | Heir | Girly | +| Sex | Male | Eyes | Blue | +| Rack Level | 2 | Cent. Lens | | +| Designation | No Designation Applied | Photo Date | April 13, 2017 | + +![](_page_7_Picture_114.jpeg) + +Close [White] + +**Additional Offender Photos** + +Offender ID - 33216 +Name: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +![](_page_7_Picture_118.jpeg) + +03/28/2017 + +![](_page_7_Picture_120.jpeg) + +03/18/2016 + +![](_page_7_Picture_122.jpeg) + +03/27/2014 + +![](_page_7_Picture_124.jpeg) + +03/29/2011 + +![](_page_7_Picture_126.jpeg) + +03/12/2012 + +![](_page_7_Picture_128.jpeg) + +03/28/2011 + +Close \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f43434028dcffd9f28ef3d38ea570766f0601af4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/EFTA02764388.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,831 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 15318, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.23, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_45.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_46.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_106.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_114.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_118.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_120.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_122.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_124.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_126.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_128.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \ntENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO COUNTER-\nQT JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 290.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 524.1954956054688, + 290.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 524.1954956054688, + 353.1272888183594 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 353.1272888183594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sex Offender Details Page - NY DCJS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 51.84 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 51.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Division of Criminal Justice Services", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.828, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 269.892, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 269.892, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 72.828, + 176.57999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Domiciled", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 274.59000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Addresses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 425.25 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 437.40000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Law Enforcement Agency Having Jurisdiction E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 292.1181640625, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 292.1181640625, + 245.18701171875 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 245.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Conviction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 159.66375732421875, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 159.66375732421875, + 277.36944580078125 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 277.36944580078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Previous Convicti squiring Registration a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 516.7304992675781 + ], + [ + 292.2522277832031, + 516.7304992675781 + ], + [ + 292.2522277832031, + 534.3823852539062 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 534.3823852539062 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supervisin Information a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 549.3504943847656 + ], + [ + 230.75222778320312, + 549.3504943847656 + ], + [ + 230.75222778320312, + 567.0023956298828 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 567.0023956298828 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Special Conditions of Supervision E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 585.7902984619141 + ], + [ + 238.72610473632812, + 585.7902984619141 + ], + [ + 238.72610473632812, + 599.1870422363281 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 599.1870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Maximum Expiration Date/Post Release Supervision Date of Sentence:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.7300033569336, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 388.52362060546875, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 388.52362060546875, + 631.7494354248047 + ], + [ + 69.7300033569336, + 631.7494354248047 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scars, Marks & Tattoos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.62999725341797, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 177.61952209472656, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 177.61952209472656, + 664.3694381713867 + ], + [ + 69.62999725341797, + 664.3694381713867 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Names/Aliases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 684.45 + ], + [ + 189.24658203125, + 684.45 + ], + [ + 189.24658203125, + 696.9894561767578 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 696.9894561767578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Vehicles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.62000274658203, + 716.8499999999999 + ], + [ + 148.02392578125, + 716.8499999999999 + ], + [ + 148.02392578125, + 729.619441986084 + ], + [ + 69.62000274658203, + 729.619441986084 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Division of Criminal Justice Services", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 619.6500000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sex Offender Details Page - NY DCJS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.14, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 58.14, + 60.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Offender Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 285.92999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Denoticed", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 302.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Offender Photos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 388.79999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 151 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 6 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764388" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_3_Picture_45.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_3_Picture_45.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d593acd20fe50beb656e222ce28dcc99e87d0fd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_3_Picture_45.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:711b61ae1626229569aaeb2ef6f3947d8f1a2754bd2fa567cc71e7bd5f113d27 +size 2996 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_6_Picture_46.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_6_Picture_46.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69a134545161d9740e95ae634df1574d7a2df72b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_6_Picture_46.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b5df67e029ce0e1b0b05bdbce91b7f5562e3e85d7395f515e268867eea001299 +size 1993 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_106.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_106.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6de558a08bd8e89eecbeee6af0ce8c05b4c5bc10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_106.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b45185f0b2323ebbd2ac5daa90e0f8bb33ca5caa75780a34945584df87a25944 +size 1423 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_114.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_114.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43979aaee5227eacbef5bf28f07c233a6db7ddc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_114.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:349ef59c9d4276cf4f3578f4f1c33b43cc0e54189836200c28386a87c0f67c17 +size 2951 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_118.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_118.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92611cd4ec3f2e9807f4e0352a06bf87744ef670 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_118.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1f40065434e189ccd0ef2ed5646bb9cbe4bee2677f10e0bd5e3d7374ed0f0440 +size 2523 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_120.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_120.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59c6a976ba3189186c1516f9ce2d5e990ace897d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_120.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6638712a692b4cf32993f81409fb7c01beccf26dcd6b1b685826741eae9fc2ac +size 2319 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_122.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_122.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b72f4179254e7c8bfb1f78719399583b35beb5a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_122.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:97be80be5505906b4ef5d5c4b724a1cb2c2d13f2f4ec8a07b4267e41f438163a +size 2019 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_124.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_124.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89f78645cd678001c5dc18991f55dcc8fe2ff41e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_124.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:97ac4d1024cdcc900eb7d56a091536c697ae726284fa628a9f3326d075c374ef +size 2199 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_126.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_126.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38f82b77df84571b447ca4cc4874d16d3afa95a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_126.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7c8a96a1a6b3567f05762f1c412d27ca91d7b42e57436ef31698ef8ad0466d21 +size 2734 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_128.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_128.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2bac12f8c37e0449aa24993758081686e2d656 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764388/_page_7_Picture_128.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:970b4cc50fb25285b03f5e0b3af56ee6294d96e27880a3b1a34b8d93d9a524d2 +size 2699 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46400c0791eb71bb8811f4f420089bbc1aa18e29 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE PM I EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +Counter-Plaintiff, ough his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 90.401403 this Motion in Limine, and requests that the Court enter an Order precluding Co dant Jeffrey Epstein from making any reference in the presence of the jury to the + +## Comparison Between th ett ment Amounts of L.M. E.W. and Jane Doe and the Damages Sought by + +1. In crent sfi d gs, Epstein has made clear that he intends to argue to the jury that cla against Epstein should be discounted because is "selfish[ly]" to "tens of millions of dollars more" than L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. For example, in his Mot to Reopen Discovery to Take Depositions, filed January 10, 2018, Epstein argued: + +Unapologetically, now seeks tens of millions of dollars more for his claimed 'emotional distress' than he recovered collectively for all three of his clients combined. Worse, he plans to 'clear his name,' recover damages and rid himself of his so-called 'anxiety' and 'emotional distress by forcing his three clients — L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — into Court to rehash the details of their claims against Epstein, which they have settled and put behind them more than seven years ago. + +The three individuals have no interest in and will receive no benefit from the outcome of this litigation and, in fact, released their claims against Epstein in July 2010. , however, for his own financial gain, plans to have them testify about their intensely personal claims solely to gain a financial windfall from Epstein for filing a civil lawsuit against him more than eight years ago. + +2. Every argument made in the preceding paragraph is irrele d highly prejudicial, and Epstein should be precluded from making any mention c nflarnmatory arguments in the presence of the jury. + +3. First, any attempt to by Epstein to make a ' tve verdict' argument by equating the settlement monies received by the three vi t t eir sexual molestation cases, totaling \$5.5 million, for emotional and physica they suffered, to the reputational damages that suffered in this maliciio ton claim is barred by black-letter Florida law. + +4. It is well-establish I that 'comparative verdict' arguments may not be permitted in a civil trial. See Millworks, Inc. v. Long, 412 So. 2d 892, 894 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Typicall e plaintiff who indulges in a `comparative verdict' argument by "suggesting to th y tha [the plaintiff] is no less entitled to recovery of a verdict than other injured pla 'v. of Corr. v. Wynn 438 So. 2d 446, 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The argument to the ightforward: Plaintiff A received \$1,000,000 in her motor vehicle crash case, which is why we feel that \$750,000 is more than reasonable for Plaintiff B in this (unrelated) case. Florida courts have repeatedly found that failure to prevent this type of argument, or sustain an objection after it is made, is reversible error. See id. + +5. Here, it appears that Epstein intends to make a "comparative verdict" argument for a much different purpose: to impermissibly use the \$5.5 million in aggregate settlements received by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe as a ceiling to cap damages by arguing to th jury that if only recovered \$5.5 million for his clients (who were sexually abused n), how could he possibly ask the jury to award any more than that amount for ra i I damages in which no physical harm was inflicted? Obviously, there is no evan hatsoever to the comparison, as the parties were different, the cases were diffe he c aims were different, the damage categories were different, and the decision to se I always involves compromise (particularly here given Epstein's blatant attempt to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe by suing L.M. and the attorney who represented all ta argument has no potential to prove or disprove a y material fact and, even if i Swo be unfairly prejudicial. Any such comparison is categorically barred by Florida I ing a `comparative verdict' argument. See id. + +is "forcing" his clients to testify for selfish motivations is highly pr I, not to mention patently untrue. Epstein filed this malicious lawsuit and clai L. ., E.W. and Jane Doe's claims were weak and had minimal value, and that E se adfabricated the claims for the sole purpose of knowingly promoting Scott Roths ' scheme. Any testimony that must offer to satisfy his burden of proof that Epstein lacked probable cause to make these claims is solely as a result of Epstein's false claims, and Epstein's suggestion otherwise is irrelevant and highly prejudicial. is simply following the legal standard by which he needs to prove his counterclaim. Any attempt to demonize for doing so is clearly improper and should be barred by the Court. 6. Second, any cl + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG J. Motion in Limine Page 4 of 6 + +7. Finally, the fact that Epstein's three victims, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, will not be awarded any portion of either the compensatory or punitive damage award against Epstein has no relevance to any material fact in dispute. Those three victims are not named parties and have asserted no claims in this lawsuit. Epstein's attempt to paint as "selfish" g legal remedies available to him for the immense damage he has suffered 's malicious lawsuit is highly prejudicial and intentioned to mislead and confus am, this lawsuit is Epstein's doing, and the attempt to paint in a negativgli for using our legal system to clear his name is blatantly improper and would serve as c our justice system. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff pectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting this Motion in Limb; g Epstein from presenting any argument, testimony, or other evidence related tot ics ted above, and awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper tl circumstances. + +C) + +A S i ller + +N.-) + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion in Limine +Page 5 of 6 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of February, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFICATE COPY + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG Page 6 of 6 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scottelinkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.cotn; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach 444 W Railroad Avenue, West Palm Beach, F Phone: (561)-721- Attorneys for Br4dley wards + +\ arc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Esquire staffs justice.com 425 s Avenue, Suite 2 ale, FL 33301 54)-524-2820 ( 54)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b634d31c92f42b4a054e35122f004fa00ccf23da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396/EFTA02764396.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764396.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7728, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nPM I EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Comparison Between th ett ment Amounts of L.M. E.W. and Jane Doe and the \nDamages Sought by", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 517.2031860351562, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 517.2031860351562, + 492.363037109375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 492.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 343.5882873535156, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 343.5882873535156, + 160.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 160.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764396" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e18268d14e6ceb3a422a37886ad9617fde33e12 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +J. + +Defendants. + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTE its undersigned counsel and respectfully point o the undersigned attorney personally res subject to the resulting conflicts ari during the indicated calendars: ye-entitled action, by and through urt and all counsel concerned herein that the trial of each of the actions listed below, is ch of the following actions being scheduled for trial + +#### NAME OF CASE '17iir + +v. UM ?S i + +Ftymyer + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXOAC + +• I', 7C1 + +### NOTICE OF CONFL + +## CASE NUMBER + +08-34444 09 Miami-Dade Circuit Court + +o n Mantel 09-513-CA-G Marion County Circuit Court + +Hanrahan v. Tribble 50-2009-CA-003971 MB-AA Palm Beach Circuit Court + +#### DOCKET + +March 1, 2011 4-week trial period + +March 7, 2001 3-week trial period + +March 28, 2011 4-week trial period + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 3rd day of September, 2010 to: Gary M. =, Jr., Esq., =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & + +Lehrman, PL, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012, Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +(11%) W 407431NOTCON36-for Trial.CEK + +C <<) + +Respectfully submitted, c i + +Fla. Bar No + +.Pviz SE BURNETT P.A. anto Plaza, 14' Floor l(345 Briekell Avenue iami, Florida 33131-3302 phone: (305) 789-9200 csimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4488e7ec474b9aa8213762e1d5b894cb20865e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402/EFTA02764402.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764402.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1876, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.23, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.57399999999996, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 541.444, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 541.444, + 134.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 292.57399999999996, + 134.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME OF CASE '17iir", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.77, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 225.38043212890625, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 225.38043212890625, + 499.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.77, + 499.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CONFL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.088, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 370.27, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 370.27, + 330.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 233.088, + 330.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NUMBER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.765, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 332.87451171875, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 332.87451171875, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 239.765, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DOCKET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 409.725, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 470.425, + 485.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 470.425, + 499.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 409.725, + 499.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764402" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7eb218b3f6156dbe6f81826185917a023bb28e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.md @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, COSA + +iC ) + +## / t NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPE \1 SSITION DUCES TECUM + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED day, February 26, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. at the Gadsden Correctional Facility, G nsboro Highway, Quincy, Florida, 32351, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je will take the videotaped deposition by oral examination for purposes of di v and for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of: + +E.W. + +The videotapsideposition will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any e officer au o administer oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a ho is neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who is neither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +Court reporting services and video equipment shall be provided by For The Record Reporting, 1500 Mahan dr. #140, Tallahassee, FL 32308, (850) 222-5491. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 7, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 + +Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) + +Angela M. Many (F + +Primary: Scott • lin ockl w.com + +Primary: Kara@l4ikrock aw.com + +Primary: An • cla nkrocklaw.com + +Seconds., inkrocklaw.com + +Seco + +anya@linIcrocklaw.com + +EserviceOlinkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant rey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Ann [REDACTED] C. Villafana
United States Attorney's Office
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[REDACTED]

| + +Dexter Lee + +United States Attorney's Office + +99 NE 4 Street + +Miami, FL 33132 + +[Dexter.lee@usdoj.gov](mailto:Dexter.lee@usdoj.gov) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1c9544d571c272b9a20d3c376223ba9f549a6c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404/EFTA02764404.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764404.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7000, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "/ t\nNOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPE \\1 SSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.952, + 311.65374755859375 + ], + [ + 492.65386962890625, + 311.65374755859375 + ], + [ + 492.65386962890625, + 370.90081787109375 + ], + [ + 119.952, + 370.90081787109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764404" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a05b6cbd321718d53cb3f98f7459c88de251ddbd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +ORDER GRANTING/DENYING EPSTEIN'S +SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO COMPEL + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on February 8, 2018, on the Court's Uniform Motion Calendar upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery [D.E. 1039]. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. Edwards' Response in Opposition [D.E. 1064], having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel is GRANTED/DENIED. + +TO THE LIMITED EXTENT THAT BRADLEY EDWARDS +SHALL DISCLOSE THE AMOUNT PAID IN FEES AND +COSTS, IF ANY, TO THE RRA BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE. +OUT THE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS OBTAINED FROM +JEFFREY EPSTEIN OR BEHALF OF L.M., E.W. AND +JANE DOE. DISCLOSURE SHALL BE MADE WITHIN +10 DAYS. + +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 8 day +of February, 2018. + +![]()SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. Edwards

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergerOcaewna.com smahonevaagwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 . Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com Angelaalinkrocklaw.corn Tina@linkrocklaw.cqm Troyalinkrocklgw.com TanvaQlinkrocklaw.com Eservice@linirocklaw.com Trial Counsel or Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr,cEs \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32131d060a2a6b94f63e3bceae6426f6d92c3d94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408/EFTA02764408.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764408.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4317, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING/DENYING EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 419.83200000000005, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 419.83200000000005, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 325.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 348.29999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764408" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad6747f7a5b172e9e5ad29cd6b5343fca78c9d4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.md @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X700CMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DE MOTION TO L EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CON EY EPSTEIN'S COUNTER-PLAINTIFF ENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF SETTLEMENT INFORMATION + +c.fk Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J E in ("Epstein"), opposes the Motion filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Designation of Epstein's Disci (`a), to Lift Confidentiality f Confidential Settlement Information, and states: + +A Cos + +In sup witnesses wom his malicious prosecution Counterclaim, women who filed civil tort claims against Epstein. has identified as [D.E. 1042]. These the three clients he represented plus other alleged victims. Neither three clients nor the other women are parties to this litigation. As previously argued, allowing any introduction or discussion of the other, unrelated claims or lawsuits would create multiple mini-trials and result in a month-long trial in this case. + +# BACKGROUND + +On January 5, 2018, the Court ordered Epstein to disclose as confidential, for attorneys' + +and clients eyes only, "the number of claims settled regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein" by Epstein from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009, and the "gross settlement amount." The same was ordered for the period December 7, 2009 through the present. See Exhibit "A" (the "Confidentiality Order"). + +Epstein timely produced this court-ordered information to in a document titled "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Client's Eyes Only Epstein's Disclosure nfidential Settlement Information." + +0• otion to lift the The Confidentiality Order requires a party to file an ap confidentiality designation prior to quoting, disclosing, relyin or lt l7fig in this litigation any of the confidential settlement information. See Ex. "A" . + +Within two days of receiving the inforrn i n ards filed his motion to lift the confidentiality designation concerning the a 14/ and after this lawsuit was filed ese numbers are relevant to Epstein's motive in filing suit against , an ourt has already ruled the number of claims predating this lawsuit is admissib ards' arguments are meritless, and his motion should be denied. ber of claims settled by Epstein before + +The prim ssue di this case is whether Epstein had probable cause to file his lawsuit e against Edw .elevant to that issue are: the publicly available information about Rothstein, the Po e, the use of clients' cases against Epstein in the Ponzi scheme, and role in the notorious litigation practices of the Rothstein firm while represented himself as a partner of that firm. Epstein has focused on these relevant matters, while persists with his attempts to inject irrelevant, highly prejudicial and inflammatory evidence into the trial, which evidence will confuse the jurors and distract them from the issues at bar and necessitate an extended collateral inquiry—all of which will lead to but one result—a second trial of this case. + +# ARGUMENT + +# A. The Court Should Revisit Its Prior Ruling + +notes this Court has already ruled admissible the number of claims Epstein faced when he filed and proceeded with his suit against omnibus order, the Court stated: . In its Jatlllte 16, 2018 + +(1/16/18 Order on Epstein's Revised Omnibus Mot ili LIN ACH, PA each Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 Pdrm Beach, Florida 33401 27-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +y: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy©Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eserviceelinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore tenus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ J. ██████ ("██████") the following: + 1. a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 2. b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + 3. c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*"The court has reviewed the heavy transaction and the concepting orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's brainstorms at the surface hearing."* (R) + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b 84sed to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in this litigation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connection with a motion, hearing, deposition or trial, before any such information is quoted, disclosed, relied upon or used, the party must file a Motion to have the information or documents deemed to be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under seal in accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclosure, reliance or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. • + +4. The Court defers rulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amounts disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlementTamounts of-' three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of-' three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclosure of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under seal-in -accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epstein's Motion. S shall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in ctions. + +DONE AND ORD in West Palm Beach, Palm Be County, Florida this 'Tlay of DuceiTiEr; 20131 + +> DONALD W. HAFELE UDGE + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepQsearcylaw.com | h rt & Shipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| isx@searcvlaw.corn | nis@FLAAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolateamgisearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Sinsellairdant/Coimter-Plaintiff J. | +| J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@epllc.com | Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com | +| staffietile@pathotojustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts Page 4 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(Thampa.com smahonev@agv'pa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 , Scott@linkrocklaw.com - Karealinkrocklaw.com Aneela@linkrocklaw.coui Tina@linkrocklaw.com Troy@linkrocklaw.com Tanya@linkrocklaw.com EserviceQlinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey E stein' ti \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..749bea01d62c5b00ff5e34351acf689649a1a144 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411/EFTA02764411.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764411.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 22306, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.15, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DE \nMOTION TO L \nEPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CON \nEY EPSTEIN'S \nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF \nSETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 534.8790283203125, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 534.8790283203125, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.255615234375, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.255615234375, + 505.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 505.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.9454345703125, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.9454345703125, + 140.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 140.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Court Should Revisit Its Prior Ruling", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 319.72735595703125, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 319.72735595703125, + 168.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 168.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Epstein's Settlement of Other Claims is Irrelevant to the Issues in This Case", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 488.0478515625, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 488.0478515625, + 637.6800231933594 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 637.6800231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Z \"Motive\" Argument is Meridess To \\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 362.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 362.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Any Probative Value is Outweiehed By the Danger of Unfair Prejudice and Burr \nConfitsion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 154.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 154.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. The Number of Settled Claims is Improper Character Evidepc-1.1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 426.5250244140625, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 426.5250244140625, + 279.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 279.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ofSexual Misconduct Claims is Improper Impeachment Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 492.5768737792969, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 492.5768737792969, + 582.9199981689453 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 582.9199981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CO 'S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 456.75592041015625, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 456.75592041015625, + 279.363037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 279.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.352, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 89.352, + 325.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 468.98999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764411" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45ad7972328ac393bcd44e132b73ee6e98d34bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.md @@ -0,0 +1,4674 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Y: + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff: + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to the Court's instruction at recent hearings, moves *in limine* pursuant to section 90.104, Florida Statutes (2017), to preclude Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") trial exhibits relating to sex offender registries that refer to Epstein and states: + +INTRODUCTION + +Edwards' Second Amended Exhibit List dated December 7, 2017 (D.E. 1109)1 identifies the following sex offender registry information: + +- 19. All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/all records relating to Jeffrey Epstein's assets (sex offender registry information was contained within the documents produced) +- 63. Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various states) +- 131. Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile + +1 A copy of Edwards' December 7, 2017 Second Amended Exhibit List is attached as Exhibit A. + +Edwards also asked the Court to take judicial notice of Epstein's New York State Sex Offender registration information. (D.E. 1040.) A copy of Edwards' November 8, 2017, Request for Judicial Notice is attached as **Exhibit B**. + +There is no dispute -- Epstein does not deny -- that as part of his criminal plea, he pled guilty to one count of an offense that requires him to register as a sexual offender and comply with additional registration related requirements. The Court has already ruled admissible the NPA, pursuant to which Epstein was required to plead guilty to a registrable offense, as well as Epstein's actual plea agreement, which expressly designates Epstein as a sexual offender. Any other materials relating to his status as a sexual offender are cumulative, provide no additional probative value and will tend to unfairly prejudice the jury. Moreover, inasmuch as the offense to which Epstein pled guilty that required him to register as a sexual offender (1) related to a specific individual who was never Edwards' client, and (2) was a procurement offense, i.e., acting as a pimp for that non-Edwards client and receiving money, rather than acting as a john paying money for sexual services, and the allegations of Edwards' three clients expressly relate to Epstein's paying them for sexually related services and not to Epstein acting as their pimp, Epstein's sexual offender registrations have no bearing on the specific claims of Edwards' clients or Edwards' malicious prosecution claim against Epstein as it relates to Edwards' prosecution of his clients' claims. This Motion, therefore, seeks to preclude any testimony (other than the basic fact that, as part of Epstein's plea deal, he agreed to and did comply with all registration requirements as a sex offender) and admission of evidence of *any* sex offender registry documents and information.2 + +--- + +2 Sex offender registry information also may be located in other exhibits, such as Epstein's probation file (Ex. 13) or the Palm Beach State Attorney's criminal file against Epstein (Ex. 29). + +At the December 5, 2017, hearing, Edwards' counsel initially informed the Court that the sex offender registry information was identified because it contained information about Epstein's assets that he intended to use in the punitive damages phase of the trial. However, the registration does not identify Epstein's net worth. It simply lists automobiles that are owned, an airplane, and identifies already known addresses where Epstein spends time. No values are listed for any of the items. In addition, Edwards has already sought an adverse inference based on Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment to all financial discovery. While the Court stated it would not address evidence pertaining to Epstein's assets "[until] the time comes, if it comes at all," Edwards' counsel then vaguely indicated he may attempt to introduce the sex offender registry information for some other purpose: + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, as part of Mr. Epstein's sex offender registration, particularly in the state of New York - I'm not sure the extent to which it applies elsewhere -- he was obliged to disclose his ownership interest in vehicles, airplanes and residences, that is, he had to list all of those things. And one of the ways that we have identified Jeffrey Epstein's assets is through those sex offender registration disclosures that he was obliged make and did make. + +So it has to do with punitive damages in addition, perhaps, to something else. But it has to do with punitive damages in particular. + +(12/5/17 Tr. 202:11-203:3).3 + +If the sex offender registration contains no net worth information, what possible other relevance could it have? Importantly, the parties have entered into a binding Joint Pretrial Stipulation, framing the issues to be tried based on this Court's rulings. **Exhibit D.** This Court will not find in that joint stipulation any issue relating to the sex offender registration or to any disputed factual issue that the registration documents would tend to prove or disprove for the + +--- + +3 Excerpts of the December 5, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as **Exhibit C**. + +simple reason that it has no relevance in this trial and would create a sideshow constituting reversible error. + +### ARGUMENT + +*Epstein's Sex Offender Documents Were Not an Issue on the Joint Pretrial Stipulation, are an Irrelevant Sideshow, and If Allowed, Would Create Reversible Error Based on its Prejudicial Impact* + +While admissibility of evidence is typically within the trial court's discretion, that discretion is limited by the evidence code and applicable case law. *See Olesky ex rel. Estate of Olesky v. Stapleton*, 123 So. 3d 592, 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Pursuant to the evidence code, to be admissible at trial, evidence must be relevant *and* not likely to result in unfair prejudice or confusion; or to cause undue delay. §§ 90.402, 90.403, Fla. Stat. + +"To be relevant, evidence must tend to prove or disprove a material fact." *Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc.*, 990 So. 2d 639, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008): "Whether Epstein is a registered sex offender has no probative value on any of the issues for trial as stipulated by the parties in the joint pretrial stipulation which now governs.. *Broche v. Cohn*, 987 So. 2d 124, 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("Pretrial stipulations prescribing the issues on which a case is to be tried are binding upon the parties and the court, and should be strictly enforced.") (citation omitted); *Central Square Tarragon LLC v. Great Divide Ins. Co.*, 82 So. 3d 911, 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (reversible error when court "impermissibly abandoned the stipulation" and allowed one party to inject a question not listed as a disputed issue in the joint pretrial stipulation). + +This Court will not find documents relating to Epstein's sex offender status probative of any stipulated issue to be tried in this malicious prosecution action brought by Edwards. The parties identified disputed issues — following this Court's rulings — and the sex offender + +registration was not one of them nor does it tend to prove or disprove any identifiable disputed fact. **Exhibit D.** + +The simple reason why neither party listed Epstein's sex offender status documents as an issue in the Joint Pretrial Stipulation is that it is both irrelevant and assuredly would result in unfair prejudice or confusion. Undue delay is also a possibility, as the introduction of the sex offender evidence may lead to a trial within a trial — or a sideshow of a criminal action and the explanation of what the various designations mean, how they were arrived at, and the criminal judicial process in each jurisdiction from which registration documents are taken. *See Slocum v. State*, 757 So. 2d 1246, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("To open the door to evidence about an unrelated case was to create a trial within a trial; there was a risk that the trial would be needlessly lengthened and that the additional evidence would obscure the discovery of the truth."). + +Even assuming Edwards "changes his mind" and deviates from his statements in open court, as he has recently done and has reserved the right to do again, and argues that the sex offender registration relates to Epstein's malice, even "[r]elevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, [or] misleading the jury." § 90.403; Fla. Stat. (2017). Whatever probative value any such sex offender registration evidence could possibly have is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to Epstein, as well as the likelihood that it would confuse the true issues in this lawsuit and mislead the jury as to the subject of the claims being tried. *See State v. Page*, 449 So. 2d 813, 816 (Fla. 1984) ("[S]ection 90.403 of the evidence code enables the trial court to exclude evidence of prior convictions, even though relevant, if the probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice."). + +But despite what Edwards might argue, in fact, the plea agreement that required sex offender registration has no relevance to any alleged absence of probable cause or malice. Epstein's plea occurred one and half years before Epstein filed his original civil proceeding against Edwards, Edwards had no role in the plea agreement, and there is nothing in it for which Edwards conceivably could claim Epstein holds him responsible. It simply had nothing to do with Edwards or the issues in this lawsuit: + +![](_page_5_Diagram_6.jpeg) + +Moreover, the offense to which Epstein pled guilty, that required him to register, related to a specific individual, A.D., who was never Edwards' client. Edwards' malicious prosecution claim relates to Epstein's complaint against Edwards based [REDACTED] Edwards litigated only his clients' claims against Epstein while holding himself out as a partner at Rothstein's firm. Those claims involved allegations that Edwards' clients were damaged when Epstein paid them money for sexual services they performed for him and only him. The registrable offense to which Epstein pled guilty was not for payment of money for sexual services performed by Edwards' clients for him, but a procurement offense, the elements of which required receipt of money for serving as a pimp for a person (again, specifically not Edwards' client) providing sexual services to a third party. Even in Edwards' misguided attempt to prove absence of probable cause and malice based on the asserted validity of the claims brought by Edwards' clients, because Edwards' clients were not suing Epstein for pimping for them or for another young woman; + +Epstein's registration arising out of a pimping offense had no relation whatsoever to the clients' claims or Edwards' malicious prosecution claim against Epstein. + +In short, not only are the exhibits relating to Epstein's sex offender registration unduly prejudicial, they are completely irrelevant to any fact at issue for trial and their prejudicial impact of a sideshow would unquestionably create reversible error. Epstein requests that this Court preclude from admission into evidence all of Edwards' exhibits relating to Epstein's sex offender registration (again, other than the basic fact that as part of his plea agreement, Epstein agreed to and did comply with all registration requirements as a sexual offender) and any reference to same by Edwards, his counsel, and any witnesses he calls. + +#### *The Sex Offender Registry Information is Improper Character Evidence* + +Additionally, the registration information is inadmissible under sections 90.404 and 90.405; Florida Statutes, because its only purpose is to disparage Epstein's character. Florida law is clear that "[e]vidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion" except under certain limited circumstances not present here. § 90.404(1), Fla. Stat. (2017); *see also* § 90.405(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) ("When character █ trait of character of a person is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense, proof may be made of specific instances of that person's conduct.") (emphasis added). Here, Epstein's sex offender registration is irrelevant to the issues at trial and would serve only to portray him in a negative light. + +#### *The Sex Offender Registry Information is Improper Impeachment Evidence* + +The registration information also is inadmissible under sections 90.609 and 90.610, Florida Statutes, because it is irrelevant to Epstein's truthfulness and goes far beyond the bare + +fact he entered a plea agreement.4 See §. 90.609, Fla. Stat. (2017) (character evidence used to impeach a witness "may refer only to character relating to truthfulness"). + +While section 90.610 permits a party to impeach a witness by evidence if the witness was convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, Epstein's registration information falls outside this narrow category of impeachment evidence by addressing the nature of his crime (a sexual offense). Impeachment under section 90.610 is strictly limited to the fact the witness was convicted of a felony or crime involving dishonesty, and the number of convictions. Further details, including the nature of the crime, are off limits. See *Rogers v. State*, 964 So. 2d 221, 222-23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("[I]mpeachment by prior convictions is restricted to determining if the witness has previously been convicted of a crime, and if so, how many times.") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); *Botte v. Pomeroy*, 497 So. 2d 1275, 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("[Q]uestioning is limited to whether the witness has ever been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty. . . The witness may be required to give the number of convictions; but if he answers truthfully, no further questions may be asked. In particular, the nature of the crimes may not be elicited.") (emphasis added; internal citations omitted); *Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc.*, 432 So. 2d 1346, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) ("Neither statute [including § 90.610] permits the elicitation of the nature of the crime, because any additional light on his credibility would not compensate for the possible prejudicial effect on the minds of the jurors.") (emphasis added). + +#### The Sex Offender Registry Information is Inadmissible Hearsay + +Finally, this Court must exclude the sex offender registry information as it is inadmissible hearsay not covered by any hearsay exception. In *Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Darragh*, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that + +--- + +4 Even the fact that Epstein entered a plea agreement is irrelevant, as there are often reasons other than guilt which prompt an accused person to enter a guilty plea. + +website materials were inadmissible hearsay, and cited with approval *St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Inst., P.A. v. Sanderson*, 2006 WL.1320242 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2006), which held that "Web-sites are not self-authenticating. To authenticate printouts from a website, the party proffering the evidence must produce some statement or affidavit from someone with knowledge of the website . . . for example a web master or someone else with personal knowledge would be sufficient." *See also Almond v. State*, 1 So.3d 1274, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ("The trial court erred in allowing the admission of Appellant's sexual registration forms . . . because none of these documents were self-authenticating business records, a record custodian was not present to testify as to their authenticity, and they did not fall under the public records exception to the hearsay rule."). + +### CONCLUSION + +As clearly established by the Joint Pretrial Stipulation; Edwards has already agreed that whether Epstein is a registered sex offender is not an issue for this trial. Moreover, Epstein does not dispute that, as part of his criminal plea, he pled guilty to one count of an offense that required him to register as a sexual offender and comply with registration related requirements as required by law — with which he has fully complied. The Court has already ruled that Epstein's plea and the fact that it required Epstein's compliance with all registration requirements as a sexual offender may be admitted into evidence. Nevertheless, neither Epstein's plea, nor the registrable offense to which he pled guilty have any relation to Edwards' clients or the specific civil claims Edwards' clients asserted against Epstein, and they certainly bear no relation to any issue to be tried in Edwards' malicious prosecution case against Epstein. Edwards cannot identify a single question of fact that the registry documentation tends to prove or disprove. Rather, this consistent attempt by Edwards to re-litigate closed civil tort claims of his clients and + +others or a criminal case which was resolved ten years earlier and interject a sideshow or minitrials in this matter must be rejected. Edwards' purpose is inconsistent with the Florida Evidence Code, specifically sections 90.401, 90.403, 90.404, 90.405, 90.609, and 90.610, Florida Statutes, by attempting to take advantage of the jury's negative reaction to such information. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an Order excluding all testimony (other than the basic fact that as part of Epstein's plea deal he agreed to and did comply with all registration requirements as a sexual offender) and the admission of all evidence of any sex offender registry documents and information at the trial of this case. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 8, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +[REDACTED] [fax]. + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +# SERVICE LIST + +| Jack Scarola. Nicliole J..Segal | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| Burlington & ROckenbaoht Seamy, Denny, Scarbia, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. | P.A. | +| Courthouse Commons, Suite 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard ) | 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach FL 33401 | +| Co-Counsel Co-Counsellor Deftndant/Counter-Plalntg | ter- labile | +| Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J,' Edwards | O b. | +| Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurilc | | +| Edwards Pottinger LLC Law Offices of | M S. urik | +| 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 One E i3roye4l3py | ard; Suite 700 | +| Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301-3268 .Ft. Lauderdale, PL 33301 | | +| Co sekt,eftndant Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff BradleyJ. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger | Scott Rbilplelri. | +| Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite.1400 | | +| e ch FL 33 01 | | +| Co-Counsel for Plaintifl7Couni endant Jeffrey Epstein | | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +EIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH +COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN; + +Plaintiff; + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN; individually; +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, +individually, and L.M., +individually, + +Defendants, + +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, +SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and hereby files his Amended Exhibit List as follows: + +INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +| O. No objection | 5. Privileged | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 1. All objections | 6. Opinion | +| 2. All objections, except authenticity | 7. Hearsay | +| 3. Irrelevant or immaterial | 8. Authenticity lacking | +| 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence | 9. Other (please identify basis of objection). | + +## Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J. Edwards, Second kmended Exhibit List + +| Counter | -Plaintiff | | | | Marked Marked for | +|---------|------------|-------------------|--------------|-------------|----------------------------------------------| +| No | | Description | | of | Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1 | All | app licable | | criminal | statutes | +| 2 | All | app licable | | Florida | Statutes | +| 3 | Photos | and | information | | of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | +| | | airplanes and | | automobiles | | +| 4 | Order | | confirmation | fr | om Amazon .com for purc hase | +| | of | books SM | 101: | A | Realistic Introduction," "Slave  | +| | Craft: | Roadmap | | for | Erotic Servitude -Principles, | +| | Skills | and | Tools" | and | "Training Miss Abernathy: | +| | A | Workbook | for | Erotic | Slaves and Their Owners' 1 | +| 5 | Non | -Prosecution | | | Agreement | +| 6 | | | | mp | laint | +| 7 | | Mesages | taken | from | message pa ds found at Epstein's | +| 8 | | Documents | related | to | Jeffrey Epstein pro duced | +| | by | Alfredo | Rodriguez | | | +| 9 | Jeffrey | | Epstein!s | fl | ight' logs | +| 10 | | Jeffrey Epstein's | | p | hone records | +| 11 | | | p | hone | records | +| 12 | Jail | Visitation | Logs | | | +| 13 | | Jeffrey | Epstein's | pro | bation file | +| 14 | All | pro bable | cause | | affidavits related to criminal | +| | | investigation | | ofJeffrey | Epstein | +| 15 | | Victims' | statements | | to the FBI related to criminal | +| | | investigation | of | Jeffrey | Epstein | +| Ifi, | Video | of | Epstein | | Property 'Inspection, | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.: Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley .1 Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List' + +| 17 | Application | for | Search | Warrant | ofJeffity | Epstein's | +|-----|---------------|---------------|-------------|------------|------------|----------------| +| 18 | Complaint | Jane | Doe v | Epstein | and | all | +| | subsequent | Amended | | Complaints | | | +| 19 | .All records | of | homes, | proper | ties, bank | accounts | +| | and any | / all records | related | to | Jeffrey | Epstein's | +| 20 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | passpor | t (or | copy) | | +| 21 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | driver's | license | (or | copy) | +| 22 | ' List of | corpora | tions owned | by | Jeffrey | Epstein | +| 23 | Yearbooks | of | Jane Doe | | | | +| 24 | 2002 | Royal Palm | Beach | High | School | Year Book | +| 25 | 2001 | Royal Palm | Beach | High | School | Year Book | +| 26 | 2003 | Palm Beach | Gardens | High | School | Year Book | +| 27 | Affidavit | and | Application | for | Search | Warrant | +| | on Jeffrey | Epstein's | home | (from | Palm | Beach | +| | State | Attorney's | File, | Exhibit | 1129) | | +| 28 | Notepads | found | in Jeffrey | Epstein's | | home and/or | +| | during | trash pu | lls outside | of | iris home | during | +| | criminal | investigation | | | | | +| 29, | The | Palm Beach | State | Attorney's | Criminal | file | +| | aga inst | Jeffrey | Epstein | | | | +| 30 | All documents | | related | to Jeffrey | Epstein's | 6/30/08 | +| 31 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | criminal | p lea | colloquy | | +| 32 | List | of proper | ties and | vehicles | in Larry | Visoski's name | + +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey-Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court case [REDACTED]
Jeffrey Epstein, Case No.
502008CA028051XXXXIMB
Jeffrey Epstein, Case No.
502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No
502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | + +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site | +|-------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 41 | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats | +| 44. | Probable Cause Af ' ed against | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey | +| | CO 'S | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter fro | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L Dennison Repo A m.. | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incidimt Report dated | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm | +| 51. | P nger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft. | +| p...c | qas enger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| Ac | aletter from Jeffrey. Epstein to Alberto Pinto | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving con | + +| | Jean Luc Brunel and is Suat, | +|-------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 630-08. | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated. | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein: | +| 62.. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epsiein's Comniuri • | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender kegistrations (from | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph. 7 | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, | +| • 66. | List ofJeffrey Epsteiles House contacts. | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein'i investments. | +| 68. | Letter fin . t. | +| 69. | Mtn Beach Police Department incident Report dated | +| • 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | + +| 72 | Letter | from | Guy | Fronstin | to | +|-----|--------------------|-----------------|-------------|------------|-----------------------------| +| | Assistant | | State | Attorney, | | +| 73 | Letter | from | Guy | Fronstin | to | +| | Assistant | | State | Attorney, | | +| 74 | Letter | from | Guy | Fronstin | to | +| | Assistant | | State | Attorney, | | +| 75 | Letter | from | Goldberger, | | 06/22/06 | +| 76 | All | subpoenai | | issued | to State Grand Jury | +| 77 | | ents | related | to | the rental of a vehicle fox | +| 78 | Ted's | Sheds | Documents | | | +| 79 | Documents | | related | to | proper ty 'setuches of | +| | Jeffrey | Epstein's | | proper | ties | +| 80 | Arrest | Warrant | | ofilla | | +| 81 | Police | repor | t regar | ding | p icking | +| | up mope | ) , | dated | 11 -28 | -04 | +| 82 | Lis i | t of Trilateral | | Commission | Members of 2003 | +| :33 | ‘ .: ik. ( ) l ait | Dershowitz | | Letter | dated 04/19/06 and Statute | +| 84\ | Guy | Fronstin | letter | dated | 04/17/06 | +| 85 | Jeffrey | Epstein | | Account | Information | +| 86 | Jeffrey | Epstein | | Criminal | Closeout Sheet | +| 87 | JEGE, | Inc | Passenger | | Manifest | + +| 88. | Hyperion Aft Passenger Manifest. | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 89.. | Flight information for | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: | +| | ,e litc | +| 92. | Pleadings of t. US case. | +| 93: | . Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech. | +| 94, | i otter to 05/01/06. | +| 95. | Police Report; 11/28/04. | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcrip ."\ | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter to 09/03/08 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan AI • eft Jeffrey Epstein's | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law | +| WI. | Emails received from Palm 13each Records | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein, | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police | + +| 106: Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| • 107. Any and all expert witness reports and/or records | | +| 108. 'Demonstrative aids and exhibits including; but not | | +| Edviirds' Serves all objections to Epsie | , | +| Edwards reserves the right to supplenientan | r | +| amend his Exhibit List | v | +| Ill. By. listing an Exhibit, Ed | i t waiving. | +| his right to object to srnn | al d does not | +| .All exhibits | subject to .Edwards! | +| .113: . AS ple,adi | d attachments in the action. | +| unde the | ictims Rights Act prosecuted• | +| by | ley wards on behalf of victims of | +| ste | criminal molestation. | +| 114. | . ' Motions for Summary ludgthent, all | +| a chnients thereto and all Undisputed Facts. | | +| 115. All time records arid hOurlybilling | | + +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced / | +| | to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. ,, ) | +| 121. | Photo depictin .9 , Ghislaine'M | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein ovalt%), | +| 124. | Evidence of contribution§ to the Palm Beach Police | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | +| 127. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | + +| 129. | 41effrey Epstein vs..Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. idivarda. | +|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records | +| | related to this matter. 44.. I , | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online.* Offender | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm c i) | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York PreSbyterian H | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (si | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the M ter, | +| 136. •Pront and Back of Hay .,, | lot Photon. | +| | fire 7 2 , | +| .Color photo o | on ferry "New York". | +| 13.8.. Scenic ph | .f Time Square. | +| 139: | photo on back of ship. | +| 140. | room in New York. | +| 141'. | or photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch). | +| 142. Color photo of linintt | Zorn, Ranch | +| standing intint o gate sign va | "Z" (NeVv.Meiric.6 | +| 143. | photO on horse front of ranch. | +| 144. | photo.standing against rocks (red | + +| 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. | tending against rocks (red coat) (far) wat ac p oto white; back date). '.hoto riding horse blue jacket far. photo on side of horse hand up.. 0,4 04' 'hoto on side of horse. hoto outside next to tables. O 16r C. ) shoto red coat leaning on rail. | +|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 151. | photo standing outside next to 1 | +| 152. | i hoto standing in front ofrarech./' | +| 153. | hoto with hand overhead ' | +| | ac w de . | +| 154. | .hoto standing next to piano.. | +| 155. | photo infront of fireplace (museum): | +| 156. | photo in•ftont of wagon in museum. | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of museum | +| | exhibition (Santa .e, ew exico). | +| 1.58. | Photograph in Spain Jeffrey Epatein and Ghiilaine Maxwell in front of building. | +| 159. | (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2. | +| 160. | Covet' photo book 2. | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | + +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 165. | steps with trees overhead. | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 170. | • Scenic photo (with back photo white and black).. | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and blaci i | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo white black | +| 173. | on steps with c 'I back photo | +| 174. | on stme wall (far) (with back | +| 175. | Travel envelope. | +| 176. | Si . • • c ' ravel Cover with handwritten notes | +| 178. | Court Docket for v. Epstein. | +| | A\ 14/ i | +| 174\ | asTyped List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the | +| 180. | ' Ghielaihe Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of in | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition. | + +| 183: | email of Assistant U.S. Attorney | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey | +| 185. | Airport Codes (Demonstrative). | +| 186. | March 3, .2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to | +| | Epstein: Pay Up! r | +| | ..:, I | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant | +| 188. | I I Redacted t taketiby Detective | +| | and Detective (with E4hibits) 10/11/05. | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigationjalm Beriah PD | +| 190. | Folder title Cell Phone Summary by | +| | Detective R sing phone records. SAO FOIA | +| 191. | Folder tidal Cel Cell Phone | +| | 09/2 005. | +| 192. | Folder fitIS AT&T February 12, 2005. | +| 193. | Demend Deposit Account Statement History for | +| 194. | 'Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997). | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Inforrnation relating to Epstein's | + +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet. | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palrh Beach | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09. | +| 199. | Juan Aleisi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. O S C | +| 201. | Passport application; issued January 12, 20M. | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 203. | Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez&\ | +| 204. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguek-St | +| 205. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planes. | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey EPstein employees and former | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents. | +| 208. | Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Public | +| | Records RequeSt (including audio recordings). | +| 209. | Any'and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with | +| 210. | All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to | +| 211. | My and all documents produced in this action. | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken. in this action. | +| 213. | My documents or other exhibit attached to or used | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M... + Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List. + +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition. | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | | | | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | | | | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | | | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action. | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + Florida Bar No.: 169440 + Attorney E-Mail(s): [REDACTED] and + mep@scarcylaw.com + Primary E-Mail: [REDACTED] + Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + Phone: [REDACTED] + Fax: [REDACTED] + Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@scarcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester Brewer, Esquire + +[REDACTED] +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +[REDACTED] +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M., +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +(Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire: + +staff. [REDACTED] + +Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistós & Lehrman, P.L., + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: [REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire: + +[REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein: - + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire: + +[REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein: + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO +FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 90.202 AND 90.203 + +Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby requests, pursuant to the Section 90.202(5) and (6) and Section 90.203, Fla. Stat., that this Court take judicial notice of Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, New York State Sex Offender registration information, which is maintained by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services at the following url: + +[http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha\\_challenge\\_field=03AHhf\\_51eLO9zflBJrQj6nFIZ9bFX-NJqrpq6v5OhzYiJrjVXGxVDm9EzTzOPlx6WkZdgBnybEGt8ufJFuaPpGbiM44zA6ij62cIIvYFrm6nY\\_F\\_indnRmf6sPU5F5TME\\_NIWhSZNDFEN8VnuwPvMQjKv2yc1BMFkYv7JQSBxdZTwlS5jQUuKkW1aHNRElFbtBV\\_vdxRMj8q-s\\_50Al52fcOh1Efg\\_XKBT7A&recaptcha\\_response\\_field=SIBLEY+BERTARINA&Submit=Search](http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/ReCaptchaServlet?offenderId=33216&recaptcha_challenge_field=03AHhf_51eLO9zflBJrQj6nFIZ9bFX-NJqrpq6v5OhzYiJrjVXGxVDm9EzTzOPlx6WkZdgBnybEGt8ufJFuaPpGbiM44zA6ij62cIIvYFrm6nY_F_indnRmf6sPU5F5TME_NIWhSZNDFEN8VnuwPvMQjKv2yc1BMFkYv7JQSBxdZTwlS5jQUuKkW1aHNRElFbtBV_vdxRMj8q-s_50Al52fcOh1Efg_XKBT7A&recaptcha_response_field=SIBLEY+BERTARINA&Submit=Search) + +EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202: +Page 2 of 3 + +A true and correct copy of the referenced Statutes and of the Epstein's New York State Sex Offender registration information is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A': + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards, respectfully requests that the Court take judicial notice of the above-described items pursuant to this Request, as well as grant any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8/7 day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [REDACTED] and +[REDACTED] +Primary E-Mail: [REDACTED] +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202. + +Page 3 of 3 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester Esquire + +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-655-4777 + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire + +Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & +Lehirman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire + +Fred Haddad, P.A. + +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +| West's Florida Statutes Annotated
Title VII. Evidence (Chapters 90-92)
Chapter 90. Evidence Code (Refs & Annos) | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +West's F.S.A. § 90.202 + +90.202. Matters which may be judicially noticed + +Currentness + +A court may take judicial notice of the following matters, to the extent that they are not embraced within s. 90.201: + +1. (1) Special, local, and private acts and resolutions of the Congress of the United States and of the Florida Legislature. +2. (2) Decisional, constitutional, and public statutory law of every other state, territory, and jurisdiction of the United States. +3. (3) Contents of the Federal Register. +4. (4) Laws of foreign nations and of an organization of nations. +5. (5) Official actions of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of any state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. +6. (6) Records of any court of this state or of any court of record of the United States or of any state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. +7. (7) Rules of court of any court of this state or of any court of record of the United States or of any other state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. +8. (8) Provisions of all municipal and county charters and charter amendments of this state, provided they are available in printed copies or as certified copies. +9. (9) Rules promulgated by governmental agencies of this state which are published in the Florida Administrative Code or in bound written copies. +10. (10) Duly enacted ordinances and resolutions of municipalities and counties located in Florida, provided such ordinances and resolutions are available in printed copies or as certified copies. +11. (11) Facts that are not subject to dispute because they are generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the court. + +![](_page_34_Picture_18.jpeg) + +(12) Facts that are not subject to dispute because they are capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned. + +(13) Official seals of governmental agencies and departments of the United States and of any state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States. + +**Credits** + +Laws 1976, c. 76-237, § 1; Laws 1977, c. 77-174, § 1; Laws 1978, c. 78-361, § 3. + +West's F. S. A: § 90.202, FL ST § 90.202 + +Current through the 2017 First Regular Session and Special "A" Session of the 25th Legislature. + +--- + +End of Document + +© 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. + +West's Florida Statutes Annotated Title VII. Evidence (Chapters go•92) Chapter go. Evidence Code (Refs &Annos) + +West's F.S.A. § 90.203 + +:90:203. eornpulsoryjudIciai notice upon request + +Currentness + +A court shall take judicial notice of any; matter in s. 90.202 when a party requests it and: + +- (I) GiVes each adverse natty timely written notice of the request, proof of which is filed with the court, to enable the . advefie party to prepare•to Meet the request. .(2) Fitnishes the court with suffident information to enable it to takcju of the matter. + +Crediti + +Laws 1976, c; 76437, § + +West's F. S. A. §99.0; FL ST §90.?0q + +•Current through the 2017 First Regular Session '81112/ " Seaton of the 25th Legislature + +bid of Document -02017 Thomson Rental. No claim to original US. 0Overnment Works, + +Anyone who uses this information to injure, harass or commit a criminal act against any person may be subject to criminal prosecution. +**Domiciled** + +![](_page_37_Picture_26.jpeg) + +Close Photos + +**Additional Offender Photos** + +Offender ID : 33216 + +Name : EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +![](_page_37_Picture_31.jpeg) + +03/28/2017 + +![](_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg) + +03/18/2016 + +![](_page_37_Picture_35.jpeg) + +03/27/2014 + +![](_page_37_Picture_37.jpeg) + +03/29/2013 + +![](_page_37_Picture_39.jpeg) + +03/12/2012 + +![](_page_37_Picture_41.jpeg) + +03/28/2011 + +| Offender Id: | 33216 | Race | White | +|--------------|------------------------|------------|----------------| +| Last Name | EPSTEIN | Ethnicity | Unknown | +| First Name | JEFFREY | Height | 6' 00" | +| Middle Name | E | Weight | 180 | +| DOB | Jan. 20, 1953 | Hair | Gray | +| Sex | Male | Eyes | Blue | +| Risk Level | 3 | Corr. Lens | | +| Designation | No Designation Applies | Photo Date | April 13, 2017 | + +**Current Addresses** + +| Type | RES (Primary) | +|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| County | | +| Address | LITTLE ST JAMES
6100 RED HOOK QUARTER
B3
ST THOMAS, Virgin Islands 00802 | + +County + +:Address 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH, Florida 33480 + +Type i• RES (Secondary) + +i County + +Address GREAT ST JAMES + +., Virgin Islands + +Vw• ••••••••••••••• •• • id .• • • I dm • • • • 4. + +IType RES (Secondary) + +!Country France + +Address. JEFFREY EPSTEIN 22 AVENUE FOCH APT 2DD • PARIS 75116 FRANCE + +• Tyne RES (Secondary) + +; County New York + +Address 9 E 71ST ST • • NEW YORK, New York 10021-4102 + +. .. .\_\_ . ..... Type RES (Secondary) + +County + +, Address 49 ZORRO RANCH RD STANLEY, New r4 + +Type. EMP (Priml y() + +County + +:Address 6100 RED HOOK QUARTER B3 • ST M Virgin Islands 00802 + +## LaW Enforeement Agency Having Jurisdiction Di + +Virgin Islands Dept of Just - Sex Offender Registry + +### Current Conviction + +, Title OUT Subsection 000000 Category Counts ' F 1 Section 000000000 Class U + +### Description + +Non-NYS Felony Sex Offense + +## Date of Crime + +i July 23, 2006 + +Female, 16 Years + +Female, Unknown + +**Arresting Agency** + +Florida Dept of Law Enforcement - Sex Offender Registry + +**Offense Descriptions** + +Sexual Intercourse + +Deviate Sexual Intercourse + +Sexual Contact + +**Relationship to Victim** + +None Reported + +**Weapon Used** + +None Reported + +**Force Used** + +Detail unknown + +**Computer Used** + +None Reported + +**Pornography Involved** + +None Reported + +**Sentence** + +Probation: 6 Month(s) Term: Time Served Unspecified + +**Previous Conviction(s) Requiring Registration** + +None Reported + +**Supervising Agency Information** + +None Reported + +**Special Conditions of Supervision** + +None Reported + +**Maximum Expiration Date/Post Release Supervision Date of Sentence:** + +None Reported + +**Scars, Marks & Tattoos** + +None Reported + +**Additional Names/Agencies** + +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY, EDWARD + +**Current Vehicles** + +Lic. Plate No. VI5890TC + +State Virgin Islands + +Year 2011 + +Make/Model + +Color + +Lic. Plate No. IAAA32 + +State Florida + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +sex-offender registrations. + +MR. SCAROLA: May we stop there? + +THE COURT: Yes. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Before we stop, Your +Honor, was about to rule on 60 through 62. + +THE COURT: Sixty through 62 is +sustained for the reasons that I've already +earlier indicated on the record. + +Sixty-three. Epstein's sex offender +registrations. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, as part of +Mr. Epstein's sex offender registration, +particularly in the state of New York -- I'm +not sure the extent to which it applies +elsewhere -- he was obliged to disclose his +ownership interest in vehicles, airplanes +and residences, that is, he had to list all +of those things. And one of the ways that +we have identified Jeffrey Epstein's assets +is through those sex offender registration +disclosures that he was obliged make and did +make. + +So it has to do with punitive damages +in addition, perhaps, to something else. +But it has to do with punitive damages in + +1 particular. + +2 THE COURT: I will take a look at that +3 when the time comes, if it comes at all. + +4 Thank you. + +5 Booking photographs. Again, same +6 ruling as I made on the other matters +7 regarding the criminal aspects of the case. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: This would simply be a +9 photograph. Your Honor. + +10 THE COURT: What's its relevancy? + +11 MR. SCAROLA: I'm not sure Mr. Epstein +12 is going to be here. + +13 THE COURT: Are you planning to +14 subpoena him? + +15 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. No. If he +16 chooses not to be here, I have videotaped +17 deposition. + +18 THE COURT: That's fine. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: I want to be able to +20 identify him as the person who got +21 convicted; + +22 THE COURT: It could be duplicative of +23 a video; + +24 MR. SCAROLA: It may be. Again, I just +25 want to explain to Your Honor that's why + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN; + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**JOINT PRETRIAL STIPULATION** + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Specially Setting Jury Trial Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards ("Edwards") hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Stipulation: + +**A. List of All Pending Motions:** The trial of this matter is special set to commence on March 13, 2018. The parties anticipate that additional Motions will be filed before that date. Presently, the following Motions/Requests are pending: + +1. 1. 9/21/17, Edwards' four Motions to Compel and the following related filing: + 1. a. 11/27/17, Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to Edwards' Four Motions to Compel. +2. 2. 10/5/17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against Edwards and His Counsel and the following related filing: + 1. a. 11/8/17, Edwards' Response in Opposition. +3. 3. 10/26/17, Edwards' Motion for Protective Order. +4. 4. 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and the following related filings: + 1. a. 11/15/17, Edwards' Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery; + +1. b. 9/25/17, Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Edwards; and +2. c. 9/28/17, Edwards' Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. + +1. 5. 11/8/17, Edwards' Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203, and the following related filings: + 1. a. 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection to Edwards' Request for Judicial Notice; and + 2. b. 11/28/17, Epstein's Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority. +2. 6. 11/13/17, Edwards' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence and the following related filings: + 1. a. 11/17/17, Edwards' Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; + 2. b. 11/22/17, Epstein's Opposition to Edwards' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; and + 3. c. 12/11/17, Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence. +3. 7. 11/17/17, Edwards' Objection to Notice of Production from Non-Parties and the following related filing: + 1. a. 11/13/17, Epstein's Notice of Production from Non-Parties. +4. 8. 11/22/17, Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice. +5. 9. 12/1/17, Edwards' Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission. +6. 10. 12/4/17, Edwards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II – V only). +7. 11. 12/4/17, Edwards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege. +8. 12. 12/4/17, Edwards' Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. +9. 13. 12/8/17, Edwards' Notice of Filing Preliminary Objections and Counter Designations to Epstein's Deposition Designations. +10. 14. 12/15/17, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness + +**B. Stipulated Facts:** + +1. 1. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea for one count of felony solicitation of prostitution, a third-degree felony, and one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a second-degree felony. (Plea, D.E. 1107.) +2. 2. Edwards was admitted to The Florida Bar in March 2002. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 43:10-12.) +3. 3. After being admitted to the Florida Bar, Edwards worked as an Assistant State Attorney at the Broward State Attorney's Office for approximately three years. (Edwards' 5/15/13 Depo. 6:11-15; Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 50:3-5.) +4. 4. After leaving the Broward State Attorney's Office, Edwards went to work for the law firm of Kubicki Draper, where he worked for approximately three years handling insurance defense matters. (Edwards' 5/15/13 Depo. 7:3-10; Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 56:10-58:5). +5. 5. Edwards formed a Florida limited liability company on April 16, 2007, by the name of "The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC." (Sunbiz.org.) +6. 6. Edwards began working at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA") in April 2009. (Edwards' 3/23/10 Depo. 13:19-22.) +7. 7. Edwards' association with RRA terminated at the end of October or beginning of November 2009. (Edwards' 3/23/10 Depo. 15:5-11.) +8. 8. While an employee of RRA, Edwards represented himself to the public, including Epstein, as a partner of RRA. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 189:22-192:9.) +9. 9. Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 267:12-13.) +10. 10. Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license in November 2009 and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 25, 2009. (11/25/09 Opinion, *The Florida Bar v. Rothstein*, Supreme Court of Florida, Case No. SC09-2146.) + +1. 11. Rothstein was arrested and arraigned in federal court in Broward County, Florida on December 1, 2009. (12/1/09 Information, *United States of America v. Rothstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331 (D.E. 1).) +2. 12. In August and September 2008, while working at The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC, Edwards filed three separate lawsuits against Epstein on behalf of three separate clients: [REDACTED] (8/14/08 Complaint, [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 (D.E. 1); 9/11/08 Complaint, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051 (D.E. 4); 9/11/08 Complaint, [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058 (D.E. 4).) +3. 13. Epstein does not admit or deny the truth of the allegations in the lawsuit brought by Edwards when he was a sole practitioner on behalf of his three clients: [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]. However, Epstein does not challenge Edwards' good faith when he filed the lawsuits against Epstein. +4. 14. While an employee of RRA, Edwards was the lead attorney on the [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] cases against Epstein. (Edwards' 11/20/17 Depo. 78:3-6; 120:11-18.) +5. 15. While an employee of RRA, Edwards was the sole employee of RRA who made strategic decisions on the [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] cases against Epstein. (Edwards' 11/20/17 Depo. 85:2-15.) +6. 16. While an employee of RRA, Edwards did not represent any individuals other than [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] with regard to claims against Epstein. (Edwards' 3/23/10 Depo. 291:8; Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 77:1-7.) +7. 17. On July 24, 2009, while Edwards was employed by RRA, a Complaint was filed on behalf of L.M. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (7/24/09 Complaint, [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 (D.E. 1).) +8. 18. L.M. already had a state court action pending against Epstein at the time the July 24, 2009, federal Complaint was filed which was based on the same facts and circumstances. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 316:11-20.) + +1. 19. Edwards never formally served Epstein with the federal Complaint that was filed on behalf of L.M. against Epstein. (Edwards' 5/15/13 Depo. 34:10-20.) +2. 20. [REDACTED] July 24, 2009, federal Complaint against Epstein alleged that Epstein forced her into "oral sex," yet [REDACTED] testified that she never engaged in oral, anal or vaginal intercourse with Epstein and she never touched his genitalia. (Edwards' Answer to Complaint ¶ 42(j) (D.E. 19).) +3. 21. While Edwards was employed by RRA he made the decision to take the deposition of three pilots who had flown, at different times, airplanes used by Epstein, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot as part of the litigation against Epstein. (Edwards' Answer to Complaint ¶ 36 (D.E. 19).) +4. 22. On August 24, 2009, L.M. noticed the depositions of Epstein's pilots Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr., and David Hart Rogers: [REDACTED] requested they produce "[a]ll original flight logs from January, 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets which [they] piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell." (8/24/09 Notices of Deposition and Subpoena Duces Tecums, [REDACTED], *Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 114, 115).) +5. 23. In August 2009, while Edwards was employed by RRA, he noticed the deposition of Donald Trump in the [REDACTED] litigation. (8/11/09 and 8/24/09, Re-Notices of Taking Videotaped Depositions, [REDACTED], *Jeffrey Epstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893.) +6. 24. While Edwards was employed by RRA, he served Answers to Interrogatories on behalf of [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] indicating that he intended to call Bill Richardson, who was the governor of New Mexico at the time; as a trial witness as part of Edwards' clients' litigation against Epstein. (Edwards' Answer to Complaint ¶ 40 (D.E. 19).) +7. 25. Edwards' three clients [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] never testified that they had sex with a celebrity, dignitary or international figure associated with Epstein. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 167:21-168:10.) +8. 26. In August 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client [REDACTED], served a Request for Entry. Upon Land seeking to inspect Epstein's entire home and property and to take videos + +and photograph it. (8/10/09, Request for Entry Upon Land, [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 143).) + +1. 27. On August 20, 2009, the Court in the [REDACTED] matter noted that [REDACTED] request to inspect Epstein's entire home and property was withdrawn. (8/20/09, Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land, [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 151).) +2. 28. In August and September 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client [REDACTED], served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's medical records from Stephen Alexander, Bruce W. Markowitz and Charles J. Galecki. The Subpoenas sought, "[t]he complete medical file including MRIs, scans, X-rays and any other diagnostic test result, Intake Form, notes, reports, opinions, correspondence to or from third parties, correspondence to or from Jeffrey Epstein, referrals, medical bills, in short, your complete file." (8/19/09 and 9/11/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*; 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 105, 127, 129).) +3. 29. On August 14, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client [REDACTED], served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's prescription history from Lewis Pharmacy and Greens Pharmacy. The Subpoenas sought, "[a] complete computer printout of any and all prescriptions for medication, name and type of prescription, and all other documentation or information on or regarding Jeffrey Epstein." (8/14/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 97, 100).) +4. 30. On April 24, 2007, [REDACTED], before she was a client of Edwards, provided a statement to the FBI. +5. 31. In September 2009, while Edwards was employed by RRA, his client, [REDACTED] testified at a deposition in her case against Epstein. +6. 32. On June 19, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his [REDACTED] client, filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure + +Potential Judgment. (6/19/09 Motion [REDACTED] v. *Jeffrey Epstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80119 (D.E. 165).) + +33. In July 2010, Epstein settled the claims of Edwards' three clients [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 305:2-3.) + +34. The Ponzi scheme through which Rothstein misrepresented claims and defrauded investors began in 2005 and ended in October 2009. (11/9/09 Verified Complaint for Forfeiture *In Rem* ¶ 13, *United States v. Real Properties Purchased by Scott Rothstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-61780 (D.E. 1).) + +35. On November 20, 2009, certain investors of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme sued Rothstein in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court, in and for Broward County, Florida. This lawsuit was part of the public record as of the date it was filed. (11/20/09 Complaint, *Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, Case No. 062009CA062943AXXXCE.) + +36. The United States government filed an Information against Rothstein on or about December 1, 2009. This criminal charge was public record as of the date it was filed. (12/1/09 Information, *United States of America v. Rothstein*, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331.) + +37. On December 7, 2009, Epstein filed a civil Complaint in this action against Rothstein, Edwards and L.M. (12/7/09 Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 5).) + +38. On December 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, Edwards filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (12/21/09 Answer and Counterclaim, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 19).) + +39. Edwards represented [REDACTED] in this litigation. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 255:5-11.) + +40. Edwards did not charge [REDACTED] for his representation of her in this litigation. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 255:12-19; 257:23-258:1.) + +1. 41. Edwards did not enter into any written representation agreement with [REDACTED] concerning his representation of her in this litigation. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 255:20-256:8; 258:2-4.) +2. 42. On January 21, 2010, a Default was entered against Rothstein in this litigation as to all claims in the December 7, 2009, Complaint against Rothstein. (1/21/10 Default, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 27).) +3. 43. In early August 2010, [REDACTED] and Epstein entered into a Stipulation for Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Individually, Only. (8/5/10 Stipulation, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 112).) +4. 44. On August 9, 2010, the Court entered a Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to [REDACTED] Only approving [REDACTED] and Epstein's Stipulation. (8/9/10 Final Order, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 113).) +5. 45. On January 5, 2011, Epstein moved to amend his Complaint, to eliminate certain paragraphs. (1/5/11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 195).) +6. 46. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothstein and Edwards for abuse of process. (4/12/11 Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 303).) +7. 47. On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint, which was corrected on August 24, 2011, bringing a claim for abuse of process against Edwards and for conspiracy to commit abuse of process against Rothstein. (8/22/11 Second Amended Complaint and 8/24/11 Notice of Scrivener's Error and Corrected Second Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 368, 370).) + +1. 48. On November 3, 2011, Edwards moved for Final Summary Judgment on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. (11/3/11 Renewed Motion for Final Summary Judgment, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 401).) +2. 49. Edwards appeared in this action as his own co-counsel on March 27, 2012, before the suit against him was dismissed. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 257:7-22; 3/27/12 Notice of Appearance, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 468).) +3. 50. On July 26, 2012, the Court set the hearing on Edwards' Renewed Motion for Final Summary Judgment to be held on August 17, 2012. (7/26/12 Order on Edwards' Motion to Reschedule Hearing, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 512).) +4. 51. Epstein dismissed his claims without prejudice against Edwards on August 16, 2012. (8/16/12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 519).) +5. 52. Edwards' income as a lawyer has been collectively greater from January 2010 to the present than it was from 2002 when Edwards started practicing law through January 2010. (Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 47:10-14; 49:4-13.) +6. 53. Edwards is not claiming a loss of income as a result of his reputation being injured by Epstein's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. (Edwards' 10/10/13 Depo. 239:21-22.) +7. 54. Edwards has not seen a doctor or taken any medication as a result of the anxiety caused by this lawsuit. (Edwards' 5/15/13 Depo. 57:23-58; 5; Edwards' 11/10/17 Depo. 112:11-20.) + +**C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:** + +1. Case Against Rothstein: What, if any, damages were sustained by Epstein and proximately caused by Rothstein? (Edwards does not agree with this language for the reason that the issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Ponzi scheme: It is Edwards' position that failure to limit the issue in this way as to Rothstein has the potential of confusing the jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable cause to claim damages against Edwards arising out of the same circumstances.) + +2. Malicious Prosecution Counterclaim: The following are issues of fact for determination at trial on Edwards' Counterclaim against Epstein: + +A.: Epstein's Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against Edwards, the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were not sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against Edwards was supported by existing facts and, thus, Epstein did not have probable cause to institute his civil proceeding. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but Edwards disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against Edwards, the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were insufficient to support a belief on the part of a reasonably cautious person that Edwards had engaged in conduct that supported Epstein's claims against Edwards. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction. The parties agree that, in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether probable cause existed to support the institution of the civil proceeding brought by Epstein against Edwards is an issue of law to be determined by the Court.) + +B.: If Epstein had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against Edwards at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding + +against Edwards, based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against Edwards was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring Edwards or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but Edwards disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against Edwards resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. (Edwards disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +E. Whether Epstein's civil proceeding against Edwards was terminated in favor of Edwards. (Edwards contends this is a legal issue for determination by the Court.) + +F. Whether the institution or continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against Edwards was a substantial contributing cause of damage to Edwards and, but for the malicious institution or continuation of the proceeding, Edwards' damage would not have occurred. + +G. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate Edwards for his compensatory damages that resulted from Epstein's institution or continuation of the civil proceeding against Edwards. + +H. Whether Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct, reckless disregard or gross negligence which was a substantial cause of Edwards' damages. + +I. Whether punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Epstein for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against Edwards and/or as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding without probable cause. + +J. Whether the claimed damage is a result of statements made after the institution of the civil proceeding and are thus protected by the litigation privilege, even if any such statements are found to be untrue. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but Edwards disputes it is appropriate because he believes Epstein's Amended Complaints are "statements made after the institution of the civil proceeding" and are afforded no protection by the litigation privilege.) + +K. Bifurcated Proceeding: What amount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages as a punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against Edwards and/or as a deterrent to others. + +D. Exhibit Lists (with Objections): The parties do not waive their right to amend their Exhibit Lists and to identify additional objections for those exhibits that have not yet been disclosed and/or provided to correspond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + +1. Edwards' Exhibit List and Epstein's Objections are attached as **Composite Exhibit A**. + +2. Epstein's Exhibit List and Edwards' Objections are attached as **Composite Exhibit B**. + +E. Witness Lists: The parties do not waive their right to amend their Witness Lists. + +1. Edwards' Witness List is attached as **Exhibit C**. + +2. Epstein's Witness List is attached as **Exhibit D**. + +F. Estimated Trial Time: Edwards estimates 10 trial days; Epstein estimates 15-20 trial days. + +**G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Try the Case:** + +For Jeffrey Epstein: +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Telephone: [REDACTED] + +For Bradley J. Edwards: +Jack Scarola +David P. Vitale, Jr. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Telephone: [REDACTED] + +**H. Number of Peremptory Challenges Per Party:** Three; + +**I. Each Party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities:** + +1. 1. Edwards' proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as **Composite Exhibit E**. +2. 2. Epstein's proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as **Composite Exhibit F**. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards* +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Joint Pretrial Stipulation +Page 14 + +DATED: December 22, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] + +By: *[Signature]* + +Jack Scarola (FBN 169440) + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff:* +*Bradley J. Edwards.* + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301. +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +[REDACTED] + +By: */s/ Scott J. Link, with permission* + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +*Trial Counsel for: Plaintiff/Counter-* +*Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH +COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, +individually, and L.M., +individually, + +Defendants, + +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, +SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +COMES NOW the Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and hereby files his +Amended Exhibit List as follows: + +INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +| O. No objection | 5. Privileged | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 1. All objections | 6. Opinion | +| 2. All objections, except authenticity | 7. Hearsay | +| 3. Irrelevant or immaterial | 8. Authenticity lacking | +| 4. Probative value substantially
outweighed by danger of unfair
prejudice, confusion of issues,
misleading the jury, or needless
presentation of cumulative evidence | 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) | + +# Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scoff Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +# Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J. Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| Counter -Plaintiff | | | | | Marked Marked for | +|--------------------|---------------|-----------------|-------------------|-------------|--------------------------------------| +| No | | Description | of | Exhibit | Objection in Evidence Identification | +| 1 | All | app licable | criminal | | statutes | +| 2 | All | app licable | Florida | | Statutes | +| 3 | Photos | and information | | | of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, | +| | airplanes | and | automobiles | | C3 S | +| 4 | Order | confirmation | | from | Amazon .com for purc hase | +| | of books | SM | 101: | A Realistic | Introduction," "SI | +| | Craft: | Roadmap | for | Erotic | Servitude -Principles, | +| | Skills | and Tools" | | and | "Training Miss Abe III | +| | A Workbook | | for Erotic Slaves | | and Their ' | +| 5 | Non | -Prosecution | Agreement | | | +| 6 | | | omp | laint | Av | +| 7 | MesSages | taken | from | | message pa ds found at Epstein's | +| 8 | Documents | related | | to | Jeffrey Epstein pro duced | +| | by Alfredo | Rodriguez | | | | +| 9 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | fl | ight | logs | +| 10 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | p | hone | records | +| 11 | | | p hone | | records | +| 12 | Jail | Visitation | Logs | | | +| 13 | Jeffrey | Epstein's | pro | bation | file | +| 14 | All | pro bable | cause | affidavits | related to criminal | +| | investigation | | of Jeffrey | | Epstein | +| 15 | Victims' | statements | | to | the FBI related to criminal | +| | investigation | | of Jeffrey | | Epstein | +| 16 | Video | of Epstein | Property | | Inspection, | + +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 18. | Cemplaint.1 Epstein and all | +| | subsequent en e Complaints. | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). | +| :21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| '23. | Yearbooks of | +| 24. | 2002 Royal Palm Beach High Schoof Year Book. | +| 25. | 2001 Royal Palm Beach High School Year Book. | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book. | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry.Visoski's name. | + +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases [REDACTED].
Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB [REDACTED] v.
Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site | +|-------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| .43. | Photos of all ofJeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats | +| 44. | Probable Cause Af ' d against | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey | +| | CC r | +| 46. | Victim Notification Lctter from US | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. ctun. | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm | +| 52.\ | \ | +| 47 | — | +| 53. - | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto | +| 54. | 'Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| 56: | MC2 cmails involving co | + +| | Pa ..as Suat, Jean Luc Brunel an | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08: , , | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 ---,,, | +| 59. | PalmBeach Police Department Incident Report dated'. c Y , 07/25/06 (unredacted) ‘.' | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. ri | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's ComMunity. Control and Probation. | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registr4tions (from. various states). | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph. | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY; PALM BEACH FL 33480. | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts.. | +| 67: | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | +| 68. | Letter from Chi | +| 69. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/19/06 (redacted)D | +| 70:. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/11/06. | +| 7L | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/13/06. | + +Jeffrey. Epstein vs. Scott ROthstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | +|-------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to | +| | CO S | +| 75. | Letter front Goldberger, 06/22/06. | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury 4 \, V | +| 77. | it Documents related to the rental of \ v • e r | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents. | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant OM | +| 81. | Police report regarding picking | +| 82. | , List ofTrilateral Commission Members of 2003. | +| iace9 | 0.410. | +| | 14/ Alan Dcrshowitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute | +| 84.. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 04/17/06. | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | + +| 88. - | HyperionAir Passenger Manifest. | +|-------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 89. | Flight information for | +| 90.. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, reM | +| 92. | Pleadings oda. US case. | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech. | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher, 05/01/06. | +| 95. | Police Report; 11)28/04. AC) | +| . 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts. | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter to 09/03/08 | +| 98. | Police report ofJuan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property | +| 163. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police | + +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped | +|-------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not | +| | the listed items/exhibits. , | +| | ' \ } | +| 109. | Edwards' reserves all objections to Epstein's Ethibits. | +| 110.. | Edwards reserves the right to SUPplethhat and/or | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, Edwards is hot waiving | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to Edwards' | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action | +| 115. | All time records and hourly.billing | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the | +|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein | +| 120. | O 'S Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produeed C a" | +| 121. | Photo depictin y , Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 122. | All flight logs fot any Jeffrey Epstein owned or | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | +| ,..t. | Nand | +| | L Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | + +| 1.29. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards | +|-------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 130. | Bmd Edward's Times Records and Billing Records | +| 131.. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital | +| | ‘N ) | +| | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (signed by tt | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the Special Master. | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Phot | +| 137. | Color photo oX on ferry "New York". | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Time Square. | +| 139. | phold on back 61 ship. | +| 140. | Picture of room in New York. | +| 141. | Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch). | +| 142. | Color photo oX at Zorro Ranch | +| 143. | photo on horse front of ranch. | +| 144. | photo standing against rocks (red | + +| :145: 146. 147. 148, | standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo white; back date). photo riding horse blue jacket far. photo on side of horse hand up. ......,L AS 7 photo on side of horse. | +|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 149. | photo outside next to tables. 0 | +| 150. | photo red coat leaning on rail. | +| | ( A.. L.) | +| 151. | photo standing outside next to firepl | +| 152. | photo standing in front o ripc | +| 153. | photo with hand ov (black/white).. r | +| 154. | photo standing mitt to piano. | +| 155. | photo in front of fireplace (museum). | +| 156. | photo in front of wagon in museum. | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of Museum exhilition (Santa Fe, New Mexico). | +| 158. | Photograph in Spain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in front of building. | +| 159. | (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2. | +| la | 'Cover photo book 2. | +| .161. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | + +| 164. | *Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +|-------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 165. | steps with trees overhead. | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| *168. | Scenic photo (with back photo white). | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo.wttite). | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photO white and black).. | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and black). | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and black). | +| 173. | RIMMIon steps with children (with back photo | +| | w ite an ac . | +| 174. | MORIon street white wall (far) (with back | +| | p tot° w tte an lack). | +| :175. | Travel envelope. | +| 176. | Sin a ore Airlines Travel Cover with handwritten notes | +| 177. | Thailand Hotel.Receipts. | +| 178. | Court Docket fo v. Epstein. | +| 179. | Typed List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the | +| 180. | cihislaine Maxwell aeposition, 04/22/16 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of in | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition. | + +| | i | +|-------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 183. | mail of Aisistant U.S. Attorney utnrnary of the Case) (Coonan Fil | +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein. | +| •I85. | 'Airport Codes (Demonstrative). | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to. Epstein: Pay Up! | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warnant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Casseitits, .Part 1. | +| 188. | MB Redacted Transcri • t taken by Detective | +| | nd betcctive (with Exhibits) 10/11/05. Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account. | +| 190. | Folder titled Cell Phone Summary by Disc 7 (State Files). | +| 191. | Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell Cell Phone Usage 09/206-10/2005. | +| 192. | Foldertitled AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement. | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 194. | Eimta Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997). | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | + +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet. | +|-------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 197. | Sworn Statement ofJuan Alessi taken by Palm Beach. | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol..!) 09/08/09. | +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. | +| 201. | Passport application; issued January 12, 2001. | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 203. | ' Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez. ,S ) | +| 204.. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 205. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties ones: | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein employees and former | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents. | +| 208. | Palm Beach County. State Attorney's Response to Public | +| | Records Request (including audio recordings). | +| 209. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with | +| 210. | All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to | +| 211. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 213. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.; + Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition. | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | | | | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | | | | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | | | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action. | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list; this 7th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + Florida Bar No.: 169440 + Attorney E-Mail(s): [REDACTED] and + [REDACTED] + Primary E-Mail: [REDACTED] + Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + Phone: [REDACTED] + Fax: [REDACTED] + Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiffs, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List: + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire + +[REDACTED] +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards. + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED] Esquire + +[REDACTED] +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +[REDACTED] +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire +[REDACTED] + +Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +[REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire: +[REDACTED] + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: [REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +.Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/ +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") hereby files his Objections to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Second Amended Exhibit List dated December 7, 2017, and states: + +**PRELIMINARY STATEMENT** + +On November 9, 2017, Edwards filed his Amended Exhibit List identifying 142 exhibits. (D.E. 1043.) On November 15, 2017, Epstein filed his Objections to Edwards' exhibits. (D.E. 1058.) In addition, on November 17, 2017, Epstein filed his Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine which, in part, addressed those objections. (D.E. 1070.) The Court heard extensive arguments on Epstein's objections at special set hearings on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017; and made rulings on those objections. While, to date, an Order has not been entered memorializing those rulings, Epstein incorporates them herein. + +On December 7, 2017, Edwards filed a Second Amended Exhibit List identifying 218 exhibits, which modified some of his earlier disclosed exhibits and identified 79 new items.1 (D.E. 1109.) At no time during the special set hearings did Edwards' counsel advise the Court that he intended to amend the Exhibit List or that the parties and Court were working from an incorrect list. + +Epstein will be filing a renewed Motion in Limine to address Edwards' newly disclosed exhibits. For ease of reference, Epstein has highlighted the changes and new items identified. + +**OBJECTIONS** + +**LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:** + +- 1 – All Objections. +- 2 – All Objections except Authenticity +- 3 – Relevance +- 4 – Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5 – Privileged +- 6 – Opinion +- 7 – Hearsay +- 8 – Authenticity +- 9 – Other (please identify basis of objection) +- 10 – Completeness +- 11 – Overbroad +- 12 – Not provided to Counsel for Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation +- 13 – Not a proper exhibit +- 14 – Trade secrets/Confidential + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | + +1 While Edwards produced many of the new exhibits on November 9, 2017, he never identified them as trial exhibits on his Exhibit List and Epstein was not aware that he intended to rely on them at trial at the time of filing his Omnibus Motion in Limine. + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" | 3, 4, 7, 8. | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 6. | Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | +| 11. | phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 14 | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection; 01/18/10 | 3, 4, 8 | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8; Cannot be read | +| 18. | Complaint [REDACTED] v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 23. | Yearbooks of [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 24. | 2002 Royal Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 25. | 2001 Royal Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home (from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13; The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was defendant | 3; 4, 11, 12, 13: This also includes a motion which is not part of the stated exhibit. | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases [REDACTED] v. Jeffrey Epstein; Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB [REDACTED] v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7; 8, 11, 12. | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site inspection of Jeffrey Epstein's home. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats and planes | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14, 12 (as to cars and boats) | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits prepared against Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victims (CW & SR) 07/09/2008 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. [REDACTED] Report of Victim | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8; 10, 11, 12 | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller [REDACTED], Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/25/06 (unredacted) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community Control and Probation | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various states). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8, Document says cannot rely on this for legal action | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (document provided is not reflective of description) | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 68. | Letter from Chief [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 69. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/19/06 (redacted) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-11-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 2-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-10-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, document produced contains other items not identified on list | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document produced contains other items not identified on list | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 81. | Police report regarding [REDACTED] picking up money dated 11-28-04 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 89. | Flight information for [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes. [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 92. | Pleadings of [REDACTED] v. US case | 3, 4, 12 (document provided is not what is identified on list), 13 | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5 th Amendment Speech | 3, 4, 12 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to [REDACTED] dated 5-1-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 95. | [REDACTED] Police Report dated 11-28-04 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter to [REDACTED] 09/03/08 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists and/or Property Receipts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (items not provided) | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits. | 12 | +| 109. | Edwards reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not an exhibit. | +| 110. | Edwards reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List | Not an exhibit | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, Edwards is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | Not an exhibit | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to Edwards' objections. | Not an exhibit. | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by Bradley Edwards on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 114. | Edwards' Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto, and all Undisputed Facts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
(duplicative of Exhibit No. 8) | +| 121. | Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | +| 123. | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 duplicative of 45 | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 2017 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 126. | Leffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein; Bradley J. Edwards and [REDACTED], Complaint, December 7, 2009 | | +| 127. | Leffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein; Bradley J. Edwards and [REDACTED], Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and [REDACTED] Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 2013 | 3, 4, 7, 13 | +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and [REDACTED], Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012 | | +| 130. | Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | +| 131. | Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 133. | Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Hospital re: [REDACTED] 001 | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (signed by Matt Groening): | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the Special Master | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Copy Color Photo [REDACTED] (Mar-A-Lago). | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 137. | Color photo of [REDACTED] on ferry "New York" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 138. | Scenic photo of Time Square | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 139. | [REDACTED] photo on back of ship | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 140. | Picture of room in New York | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 141. | Color photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 142. | Color photo of [REDACTED] at Zorro Ranch standing in front of gate sign with "Z" (New Mexico Ranch) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 143. | [REDACTED] photo on horse front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 144. | [REDACTED] photo standing against rocks (red coat) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 145. | [REDACTED] standing against rocks (red coat) (far) (with back photo white; back date): | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 146. | [REDACTED] photo riding horse blue jacket far | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 147. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse hand up | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 148. | [REDACTED] photo on side of horse | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 149. | [REDACTED] photo outside next to tables | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 150. | [REDACTED] photo red coat leaning on rail | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 151. | photo standing outside next to fireplace | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 152. | photo standing in front of ranch | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 153. | photo with hand over head(black/white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 154. | photo standing next to piano | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 155. | photo in front of fireplace(museum) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 156. | photo in front of wagon in museum | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of museum exhibition (Santa Fe, New Mexico) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 158. | Photograph in Spain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in front of building! | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 159. | (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 160. | Cover photo book 2 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 165. | steps with trees overhead | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo white) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and black) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and black) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo white and black) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 173. | on steps with children (with back photo white and black) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 174. | on street white wall (far) (with back photo white and black)! | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 175. | Travel envelope | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 176. | Singapore Airlines Travel Cover with handwritten notes by | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 177. | Thailand Hotel Receipts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 178. | Court Docket for [REDACTED] v. Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | +| 179. | Typed List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of [REDACTED] in Australia
(Redacted) 03/17/11 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann
([REDACTED] (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File)) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 185. | Airport Codes (Demonstrative) | 3, 7, 8, 10 | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post; Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk
Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 (only photo of DVDs provided) | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective [REDACTED]
(with Exhibits) 10/11/05 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation; Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 190. | Folder titled [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective [REDACTED]
Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files) | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 191. | Folder titled [REDACTED] Cell [REDACTED] Cell Phone
Usage 09/2005-10/2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 192. | Folder title [REDACTED]; AT&T February 12, 2005
Statement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 14 | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach Police Department | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | + +| No. | Edwards' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100 | 3, 4 | +| 201. | Passport application; issued January 12, 2001 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 6, 7 | +| 203. | Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 6, 7 | +| 204. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8 | +| 205. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planes | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein employees and former employees | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents | 3, 4 | +| 208. | Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Public Records Request (including audio recordings) | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | +| 209. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | +| 210. | All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | +| 211. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | 12 | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | 12, 13 | +| 213. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action | 12, 13 | +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition | 12, 13 | +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | 12, 13 | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | 12 | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action | 12, 13 | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action | 12, 13 | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [fax] + +By: */s/ Scott J. Link* + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Primary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +Secondary: [REDACTED] + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Scarcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Bradley J. Edwards
Edwards Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Et. Lauderdale, FL 33301
[REDACTED]
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +F + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXXMBAG. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter: + +INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +| 0. No Objection | 5. Privileged. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 1. All objections. | 6. Opinion | +| 2. All objections, except authenticity | 7. Hearsay | +| 3. Irrelevant or immaterial | 8. Authenticity lacking | +| 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence | 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.
15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB. | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to [REDACTED] Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of Bradley J. Edwards | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Bradley J. Edwards | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | Bradley J. Edwards' Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Bradley J. Edwards (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. Russell Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Discala (5/25/11)
f. Dean Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission; Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery; and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15 th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of [REDACTED] | | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements provided in the matter | | | | +| | | | | | | + +## - ,,M..v. Jeffrey Epstein 15'1'. Judicial.dicuittase No;.50-200&CA.,028651)0CXX1VIB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein. | | +|----|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] (9/24/09; 2/9/10) | | + +# EMI ii. Jeffit Epsfeli; • .USDC Si/ Fla; taseNo. 09;CV-81092 \_ + +| 30 , | Misc | Court | docket; | all | court filings | referenbed | therein and | +|------|---------|-----------|----------------|-----------|---------------|--------------|--------------| +| | | all | disCovery | and | discovery | responses | | +| 31 | 7/24/09 | ComPlaint | and | Demand | for | Jury Trial | | +| 32 | 7/20/10 | | Stipulation of | Dismissal | With | Prejudice | (D .E 21) | +| 33 | Misc | All | testimony, | | deposition | transcripts, | exhibits and | +| 34 | | Federal | Rule | of Civil | Procedure, | Rule | 11 | + +# \_. EIV..v..Jeffiiii 4.00A, 1511'.JudieialCircuit Case No:.50200graA-628658,bOCXMB. + +| 35 | Misc | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| | | .all discovery and discovery responses | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate or Limit Deposition and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Compel for Sanctions | | | | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez | | | | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case With Prejudice | | | | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] (5/6/10) | | | | +| [REDACTED] J. Jeffrey Epstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | | | +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | | | | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | | | | +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring [REDACTED] Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED] Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED] Michael Freidman, [REDACTED] and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff [REDACTED] Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
b. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
c. Russell Adler (10/28/10). | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein - Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against Bradley J. Edwards, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against Bradley James Edwards ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback-Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler - Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Bradley J. Edwards, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. Farmer (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to Bradley J. Edwards (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to Bradley J. Edwards (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to Bradley J. Edwards (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to Bradley J. Edwards (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to Grace Torres, cc Russell Adler and Bradley J. Edwards (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan K. Stirling, cc Carla Martinez (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler; William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to Bradley J. Edwards (08404) | | | | +| 119 | 7/4/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (04905) | | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01661) | | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05803) | | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Bradley J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from Bradley J. Edwards re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to Bradley J. Edwards (03070) | | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05848) | | | | +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Cara L. Holmes to Bradley J. Edwards (08420) | | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (11075-11076) | | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05852-05853) | | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (05952-05953) | | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (02895) | | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to Bradley J. Edwards and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie Johnson; Pat Roberts and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (07612-07613) | | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (02595-02596) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Conchita Sarnoff
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07695-07696) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat Roberts (01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED]
cc Bradley J. Edwards (01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Renee/Carlos Morrison (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Nigel Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to Bradley J. Edwards (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie Johnson (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Jacquie Johnson (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Richard Johnson (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. Smith to Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Russell Adler, cc Grant J. Smith (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Bradley J. Edwards (01727) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson, cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Jacquie Johnson (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie Johnson (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from George Rush to Bradley J. Edwards (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Russell Adler, Cara L. Holmes, Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. Edwards, Barry J. Stone and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Bradley J. Edwards, Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. Holmes, William J. Berger, Russell Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. Edwards, cc Grace Torres and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat Diaz to Bradley J. Edwards (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra Villegas to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Jacquie Johnson and Bradley J. Edwards (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and Bradley J. Edwards | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id: | +|---------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad Edwards' Time in Edwards adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 - BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to Bradley J. Edwards (BJE000000039 - BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 - 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 - BJE000000038) | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | Fowler White Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. ( http://www.fowler-white.com/Attorneys/id/3/read ) | | | | +| Bradley J. Edwards | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for Bradley James Edwards | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel: biographical information for Bradley J. Edwards | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+Edwards&city=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad Edwards
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/Edwards/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for Bradley J. Edwards ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/Bradley-J-Edwards-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards: | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by Bradley J. Edwards | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards with referenced articles | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 104; Issue 1. 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim: Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | Farmer Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on. Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James Edwards; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-MA | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James Edwards; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-MA | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion - Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | Bradley J. Edwards' Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description. | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| Experts | | | | | | +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +| 284 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 287 | Misc. | All public records, news articles and prior testimony of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen | | | | +| Other Articles | | | | | | +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies, WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel: Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel: High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder George Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme: Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 11/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by the Florida Bar | | | | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered. | | | | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | | | | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | | | | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Bradley J. Edwards and any witnesses listed by either party | | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by Bradley J. Edwards (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of Edwards' exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: + +Primary: + +Primary: + +Secondary: + +Secondary: + +Secondary: + +Secondary: + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley; P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Bradley J. Edwards
Edwards Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
[REDACTED]
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro; PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and +L.M.; individually, + +Defendants. + +**OBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST** + +Bradley J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned counsel, files his Objections to Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Exhibit List dated November 16, 2017, as follows: + +**INDEX TO OBJECTIONS** + +| 0. No Objection | 5. Privileged | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 1. All objections | 6. Opinion | +| 2. All objections, except authenticity | 7. Hearsay | +| 3. Irrelevant or immaterial | 8. Authenticity lacking | +| 4. Probative value substantially outweighed
by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues,
misleading the jury, or needless presentation of
cumulative evidence | 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | 0 | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards | 0 | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stimulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to [REDACTED] individually Only | 0 | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of Bradley J. Edwards | 0 | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Bradley J. Edwards | 0 | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | Bradley J. Edwards' Fourth Amended Counterclaim | 0 | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | 1 | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein. | 1 | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Bradley J. Edwards (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. Russell Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Discala (5/25/11)
f. Dean Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. [REDACTED] (10/12/17) | 2 | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | 2 | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | 1 | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits. | 1 | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of [REDACTED] | 1 | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements provided in the matter | 1 | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | 1 | | | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | 0 | | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | 0 | | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | 2 | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | 2 | | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | 2 | | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | 2 | | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | 2 | | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] (9/24/09; 2/9/10) | 1 | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 | | | | | | +| 30 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 2 | | | +| 31 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | 0 | | | +| 32 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes. | 1 | | | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | 2 | | | +| E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | 0 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | 0 | | | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate or Limit Deposition and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Compel for Sanctions | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez | 0 | | | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | 0 | | | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | 0 | | | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case With Prejudice | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] (5/6/10) | 1 | | | +| Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | | | +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | 0 | | | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | 0 | | | +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring [REDACTED] Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | 0 | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | 0 | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | 0 | | | + +| No: | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id: | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Weyler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, [REDACTED] and Michael Sanka. | 0 | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +|

[REDACTED] v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated/Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119

| | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff [REDACTED] Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | 0 | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff [REDACTED] Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | 0 | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff [REDACTED] Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | 0 | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff [REDACTED] Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | 0 | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | 3, 4, 7 | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +|

[REDACTED] v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV

| | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | 0 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | 3, 4, 7, 8. | | | +| 17th Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | 1 | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
b. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
c. Russell Adler (10/28/10). | 1 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein - Forfeiture Action USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | 3, 4, 7, 8. | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against Bradley J. Edwards, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | 0 | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146. | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against Bradley James Edwards ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | .0 | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | 1 | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | 1 | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler - Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | 1 | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01620) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01446) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Bradley J. Edwards, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. Farmer (01726) | 1 | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to Bradley J. Edwards (05725) | 1 | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler (01574) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer Wendell (01449) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to Bradley J. Edwards (05148) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96. | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Timothy Malloy (01450) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 97. | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to Bradley J. Edwards (05151) | 1 | | | +| 98. | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to Bradley J. Edwards (05161) | 1 | | | +| 99. | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 100. | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to Grace Torres, cc Russell Adler and Bradley J. Edwards (01735) | 1 | | | +| 101. | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan K. Stirling, cc Carla Martinez (01410) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 102. | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Eric Glasser (06655) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 103. | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 104. | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 105. | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | 1 | | | +| 106. | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 107. | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05277-05278) | 1 | | | +| 108. | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 109. | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05324-05325) | 1 | | | +| 110. | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 111. | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05344-05346) | 1 | | | +| 112. | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 113. | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05368-05369) | 1 | | | +| 114. | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 115. | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05387-05388) | 1 | | | +| 116. | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | + +| | Marked | +|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| No. | Date Dateription Objection Marked for Id. in Evidence E-mail from Bradley J..Edwards to Missal! Adler,, 3, 4, 5, 8. | +| 117 | 7/8/09 William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) 3:36 p.m. E-mail from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily | +| .118 . | 7/13/09 News) to Bradley J. Edwards (08404) 2:28 p.m. E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to William J. 3, 4; 5, 8 | +| 119 | 7/4/09 4:37 p.m. Berger (02204) E-mail froMBradlcy J. Edwards to Michele Dargan 3;4, 5, 8 | +| .120. | 7/15/09 (04906) .1:17 p.m. E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J..Edwards | +| 121 | 7/15/09 ki 1:22 p.m. (04905) Q, 4, 5 8 r i E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Rusiell Adler | +| 122. | 7/18/09 4:10 p.m. (01661) • 3, 4, ,, 8 | +| 121 | 7/21/09 | +| | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone ' 8:21 p.m. (01352) E-mail frithBradley J. Edwards td Mieheletargan " 3,4, 5;8 | +| 124 | 7/22/09 11:22 a.m. (01479) | +| 125 | 7/22/09 E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Ettwards 11:35 a.m. (05803 E-mail from Jitcquie Johnson to Bradley J. Edwards | +| 126 | 7/22/09 1:29 p.m. (01662) | +| 127 | 7/22/09 Letter. from Bradley J. EdWards re cross .3, 4, 5, 8. noticing &positions E-mail from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott | +| 128 | 7/26/09 Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello 5:28 p.ni. (25860-25863) E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer 3, 4, 5; 8 | +| 129 | 7/28/09 Wendel (01483) 8:59 a.m. E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to Bradley J. | +| 130 | 7/28/09 Edwards (03070) 8:59 a.m. E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan 3, 4, 5, 8 | +| 131 | 7/28/09. 9:28 a.m. (01486) E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards | +| 132 | 7/28/09 10:00 a.m. (05848) .E-mail from Cam L. Holmes to Bradley J. Edwards | +| 133 | 7/29/09 | +| | .1:13 p.m.. (08420) E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards | +| 134 | 7/28/09 1:47 p.m. (11075-11076) E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards. | +| 135 | .7/29/09 1:49 p.m. (05852-05853) 3, 4, 5; 8 E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Daman | +| 136 | 7/30/09 (05535-05536) 2:36 p.m. E-mail from Bradley J. Edwarda.to Michele Dargan 3, 4, 5;8, | +| 137; | 7/30/09 (11320-11322) 2:36 p.m. | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (11080-11082) | 1 | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06965) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06967) | 1 | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06963-06964) | 1 | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06959-06960) | 1 | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | 1 | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06976-06977) | 1 | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson (02442) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenne (01501) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (01506) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (05952-05953) | 1 | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (02895) | 1 | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to Bradley J. Edwards and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie Johnson, Pat Roberts and Mike Fisten (01376) | 1 | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (07612-07613) | 1 | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (02595-02596) | 1 | | | + +| • No:. | Dete. | Description. | 'Objection . Marlced | +|--------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| | | | ! in | +| 159. | 9/7/09. | E-mail from Bradley J. EdWards t. | 3;4, 5, 8. | +| | 6:49 p.m. | (07614-07615 | | +| 160 | 9/7/09 | E-mail from to Bradley J. Edwards | 1 | +| | 7:00 p.m. | (07605-0760 | | +| 161 | 9/7/09 | | | +| | | E-mail from Bradley-J. Edwards to | , 3,4; 5; 8 t ii | +| 162 | .9/7/09 | E-mail from to Bradley J. Edwards | 1. N.- | +| | 10:55 p.m. | (07609-0761 | | +| 163 | 9/8/09 | E-mail from Bnidley J: Edwårds to | 3, 4; X2 | +| | .11:43 a.m. | (04015 | ,---1- | +| • 164 | 9/8/09 | E-mail lfrao•Bnpdley J. Edwards | 1 | +| 165 | 9/8/09 | E-mail from Bradley J: EdWards to | 3, 4, 5,.8 | +| | 11:53 a.m. | (07647) | | +| -166. | - 9/8/09 | • E-rnail froiri ci Bradley J. EdWardl• | 1- | +| | 12:04 p.m. | (07676-07677 | | +| 167 | 9/8/09 | E-mail from to Bradley J. Edwards | 1 | +| | 1:59 p.m. | (07674-07675) | | +| 168- | 9/8/09 | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to | 3;4, 5, 8 | +| | .2:04 p.m. | (07678-07679 | | +| 169 | 9/8/09 | E-mail fro o Bradley J. EdWards | 1 | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (07684-076 | | +| 170 | 9/8/09. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to-.3, | 4, 5, 8 | +| | 2:42 p.m. | (07682-0168 | | +| 171. | 9/8/09 | E-mail from to Bradley J. Edwards' | 1 | +| | . 2:49 p.m. | (07695-0769 | | +| 172 | 9/8/09 | E-mail froin to Bradley J, Edviårds | 1 | +| | 3:25 p.m. | (07680-07681) | | +| 173 | 9/8/09 | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to | 4, 5, .8 | +| | 7:51 p.m. | (07686-076 ! | | +| 174 | 9/8/09 | E-mail fro Bradley J. Edwards. | 1 | +| 175 | 9/8/09 | E-mailsfrom to Bradley J. Edwärds. | 1 | +| | 7:53 p.in. | (07692-07694) | | +| .176 | 9/15/09 | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Elizabeth Villar, | 3, 4, 5, 8 | +| | . 1:08 p.m. | cc Ken Jenne and Pat Roberts (01361) | | +| 177 | 9/18/09 | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Russell Adler | 3; 4, 5, 8 | +| | 12:35 p.m. | (01318) | | +| 178 | 9/18/09 j | raärLom Jacquie Johnson t | 1 | +| | 12:35 p.m. la | cc Bradley J. Edwarffi l | | +| 179 | 9/18/09 | E-inail from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer | 3, 4, 5, 8 | +| | 1:01 p.m. | Wendel (05619-05620) . | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (01144) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (01280-01288) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (03081) | 1 | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (04320) | 1 | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (04321) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (04318-04319) | 1 | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (10586-10589) | 1 | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Renee Carlos Morrison (02913) | 1 | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (06789) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (06788) | 1 | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] (19986-19987) | 1 | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Nigel Rosser (06191) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to Bradley J. Edwards (06189-06190) | 1 | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06979-06980) | 1 | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie Johnson (06974) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Jacquie Johnson (06955-06956) | 1 | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Richard Johnson (06961) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. Smith to Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Russell Adler, cc Grant J. Smith (26507) | 1 | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Bradley J. Edwards (01727) | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson, cc Mike Fisten (01744) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (03190) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (03189) | .1 | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Bradley J. Edwards, cc Jacquie Johnson (01099) | 1 | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie Johnson (01741) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | 1 | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenne (01704) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from George Rush to Bradley J. Edwards (01433) | 1 | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | 1 | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | 3, 4, 5, 8 | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Russell Adler, Cara L. Holmes, Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. Edwards, Barry J. Stone and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | 1 | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to Bradley J. Edwards, Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. Holmes, William J. Berger, Russell Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | 1 | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. Edwards, cc Grace Torres and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | 1 | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat Diaz to Bradley J. Edwards (01623) | 1 | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | 1 | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to Jacquie Johnson and Bradley J. Edwards (01625) | 1 | | | +| | | | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and Bradley J. Edwards | 2 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad Edwards' Time in Edwards adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | 0. | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to Bradley J. Edwards (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | 2 | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | 2 | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 098308 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards | 0 | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird. | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | Fowler White Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. ( http://www.fowler-white.com/Attorneys/id/3/read ) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Bradley J. Edwards | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | 3, 4, 8 | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for Bradley James Edwards | 7, 8 | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel. biographical information for Bradley J. Edwards | 7, 8 | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory. ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+Edwards&city=&state=FL& ) | 7, 8 | | | + +| No.. | Date | Description | +|------|----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| | | 'Objection Marked | +| 233 | .5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for Bradley J. 7, | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | KubickiOraper's website attorney information for | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubiolci Draper's website attorney information for | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos '& | +| | | 7; 8 | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| 242. | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | +| | | ' 7' ,8 . | +| 245 | | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | 3, 7, 8 | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail. Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | 0 | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | 0 | | | +| | | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| | | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | Farmer Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | 0 | | | +| | | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | 0 | | | +| | | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | 0 | | | +| | | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | 0 | | | +| | | Court and arrest information; Bradley James Edwards; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-MA | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James Edwards; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-MA | 1 | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James Edwards; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-MA | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion - Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | 1 | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | 1 | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | Bradley J. Edwards' Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. | 1 | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | 1 | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11- | 1 | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | 1 | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | 1 | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC | 1 | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | 1 | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | 1 | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | 1 | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | 1 | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | 1 | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | 1 | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | 1 | | | +| Expents | | | | | | +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | 0 | | | +| 284 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | 0 | | | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | 1 | | | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | 1 | | | +| 287 | Misc. | All public records, news articles and prior testimony of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen | 1 | | | +| Other Articles | | | | | | +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8. | | | +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein
Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | 3, 4, 7, 8. | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals: Seemed Too Good to be True | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam: | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder George Levin's Ugly Past | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town" Full of Thieves | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys
Cleared by the Florida Bar | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | 3, 4, 7, 8 | | | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | 0 | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Bradley J. Edwards and any witnesses listed by either party | 1 | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | 1 | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | 1 | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | 1 | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | 1 | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | 1 | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | 1 | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | 1 | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by Bradley J. Edwards (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of Edwards' exhibits introduced at trial) | 1 | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 12th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +David P. Vitale Jr. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +![]()Primary E-Mail: [REDACTED] +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +[REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: + +[REDACTED] + +Fax: + +[REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A., +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +[REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: + +[REDACTED] + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +EXHIBIT C + +NOTA CORRECTED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and +L.M., individually; + +Defendant, + +SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL WITNESS LIST +OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS + +Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys; +hereby supplements his list of witnesses for trial as follows: + +WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED + +1. Bradley J. Edwards + +2.. Jeffrey Epstein + +3. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o John Stephenson + +[REDACTED] + +4. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Erica Dubno + +[REDACTED] + +5. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Stan Pottinger + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 2 of 22 + +6. + +c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq. +Mintz & Gold LLP + +[REDACTED] + +7. + +c/o Peter Guirguis, Esq. +Mintz & Gold LLP + +[REDACTED] + +8. + +[REDACTED] + +9. + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +10. + +Robert C. Josefsberg, Esquire: +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +11. + +Detective [REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department + +[REDACTED] + +12. + +Chief [REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department + +[REDACTED] + +13. + +John Connolly +c/o Simon & Schuster + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 3 of 22 + +14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire +Berger Singerman + +[REDACTED] + +15. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +16. Antonio Figueroa (Tony) +Palm Coast, Florida + +17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Police Department + +[REDACTED] + +18. Records Custodian of United States Attorney's Office +for the Southern District of Florida + +19. Records Custodian of the Federal Bureau of Investigations + +20. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +21. Theodore Leopold, Esquire +Cohen Milstein + +[REDACTED] + +22. Rinaldo Rizzo +c/o Robert Lewis + +[REDACTED] + +23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 4 of 22 + +24. Isidro M. Garcia, Esquire +Garcia Law Firm, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +25. Earleen Cote, Esquire +Kubicki Draper + +[REDACTED] + +26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. +c/o Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +[REDACTED] + +27. William Berger, Esquire +Weiss, Handler, Cornwell, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES + +28. [REDACTED] + +29. Landon Thomas +c/o New York Times. + +[REDACTED] + +30. Oren Kramer +c/o Boston Provident, L.P. + +[REDACTED] + +31. [REDACTED] +United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida +Broward Financial Center +Fort Lauderdale, Florida + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 5 of 22 + +32. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +33. + +[REDACTED] + +34. + +[REDACTED] + +35. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +36. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Jack Scarola +Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +[REDACTED] + +37. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq., +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] +N + +38. + +Brandy Brenson +c/o Spencer Kuvin + +[REDACTED] + +39. + +[REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq., +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 6 of 22 + +40. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Spencer Kuvin. + +[REDACTED] + +41. + +William Scherer, Esquire. + +[REDACTED] + +42. + +Paul Cassell, Esq. + +[REDACTED] + +43. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +44. + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +45. + +[REDACTED] + +Cartwright + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +46. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA. + +[REDACTED] + +47. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +'case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-plaintiff Bradley l. Edwards + +Page 7 of 22 + +- 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian EdWards Duke of York, Buckingbain Palace Road London SWIA IAA + +49.. Frederic Fekkai Addreis Currently Unknown + +- 50. RIP ti JoSe l EST + +MOM + +- 51. Lesley Groff' dO Mike Miller + +- 52. Dave Rogers + +- 53. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law + +54: . Joscfsberg, Esq. + +o Ro Josefsberg, Esq. + +1111=1 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 8 of 22 + +56. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +57. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +58. + +Tod Meister + +[REDACTED] + +59. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +60. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. + +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +61. + +c/o Spencer Kuvin + +[REDACTED] + +62. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Marshall Dore Louis + +[REDACTED] + +63. + +Jason Richards + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 9 of 22 + +64. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Bradley Edwards, Esq. + +Edwards Pottinger LLC + +[REDACTED] + +65. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Bradley Edwards, Esq. + +Edwards Pottinger LLC + +[REDACTED] + +66. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +67. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +68. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Adam Horowitz. + +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +69. + +[REDACTED] + +Federal Bureau of Investigation + +[REDACTED] + +70. + +[REDACTED] + +c/o Isidro M. Garcia + +Garcia Law Firm, P.A. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 10 of 22 + +71. Igor Zinoview +Address Currently Unknown. + +72. [REDACTED] +Address Currently Unknown + +73. [REDACTED] + +74. Seth Lehrman +[REDACTED] + +75. Matt Weissing +[REDACTED] + +76. [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +77. Any additional individuals identified as victims by the United States Attorney's Office and whose identities were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list supplied as it related to the NPA. + +78. Leslie Wexner +[REDACTED] + +79. President Donald J. Trump +c/o Alan Garten, Esq. +[REDACTED] + +80. Larry Visoski +[REDACTED] + +81. [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +82. Maximilia Cordero +c/o William Unroch, Esquire + +[REDACTED] + +83. [REDACTED] +c/o Spencer Kuvin + +[REDACTED] + +84. [REDACTED] + +85. [REDACTED] +c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. +Podhurst Orseck, PA + +[REDACTED] + +86. David Connerfield (David Seth Kokin) + +[REDACTED] + +87. [REDACTED] + +88. Michael Fisten +Weston, FL + +89. Russell Adler +Delray Beach, FL + +90. Marie Alessi + +[REDACTED] + +91. Janusz Banasiak +358 El Brillo Way +Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards. + +Page 12 of 22. + +92. Beata Banasiak +358 El Brillo Way +Palm Beach, FL, 33480 + +93. Juan Alessi +[REDACTED] + +94. Michael Friedman +[REDACTED] + +95. Jerry Goldsmith +[REDACTED] + +96. [REDACTED] + +97. Valdson Cotrin +Address Currently Unknown + +98. [REDACTED] + +99. [REDACTED] +Unknown, South Africa + +100. Glenn [REDACTED] + +101. Abigail Wexner +[REDACTED] + +102. Officer [REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department. +345 South County Road + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 13 of 22 + +Palm Beach, FL 33480. + +103. Officer [REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480: + +104. Sgt. [REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road. +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +105. [REDACTED] +Address Currently Unknown + +106. Joseph Pagnano +[REDACTED] + +107. Stephan Kosslyn +[REDACTED] + +108. Cecile Dejongh +[REDACTED] + +109. Tommy Mottola +[REDACTED] + +110. Mike Sanka +[REDACTED] + +111. [REDACTED] +S/A. Witness #108 + +112. William "Bill" [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 14 of 22 + +113. Howard Rubenstein + +[REDACTED] + +114. Robert Meister + +[REDACTED] + +115. Todd Meister + +[REDACTED] + +116. President William J. Clinton + +117. William Hammond + +[REDACTED] + +118. Robert Roxburgh + +[REDACTED] + +119. + +[REDACTED] + +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +120. + +[REDACTED] + +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +121. Amy Fortimer + +[REDACTED] + +122. + +[REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 15 of 22 + +123. + +[REDACTED] + +124. + +[REDACTED] + +125. + +[REDACTED] + +126. + +Latasha Lowe +c/o Adam Horowitz, +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +127. + +[REDACTED] + +128. + +Zack Bryan + +[REDACTED] + +129. + +[REDACTED] + +130. + +Larry Morrison + +[REDACTED] + +131. + +Story Cowles + +[REDACTED] + +132. + +[REDACTED] +Palm Beach Police Department +345 South County Road +Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 16 of 22 + +133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe + +[REDACTED] + +134. Jelitza Negrette + +[REDACTED] + +135. Sergia Cordero + +[REDACTED] + +136. Cassandra Rivera + +[REDACTED] + +137. [REDACTED] + +Palm Beach Victim Services +205 North Dixie Highway, #5:1100 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +138. [REDACTED] + +Address Currently Unknown + +139. Steven Hoffenberg + +Address Currently Unknown + +140. Michael Stroll + +Address Currently Unknown + +141. Donglas Shoettle + +[REDACTED] + +142. Ghislaine Maxwell + +Address Currently Unknown + +143. Amazon Records Custodian + +144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 17 of 22 + +1. 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian +2. 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian +3. 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian + 5770 East Milton Road + Milton, FL +4. 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian + 3344 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite C-124 + West Palm Beach, FL 33406 +5. 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian + 901 45th Street + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +6. 150. Wellington Reginal Hospital Records Custodian + 10104 Forrest Hill Blvd. + Wellington, FL 33414 +7. 151. All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff. +8. 152. All rebuttal witnesses. +9. 153. All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. + +**WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED +BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION.** + +1. 154. Mark Epstein + 30 Vandam Street + New York, NY 10013 + +1. 155. [REDACTED] + c/o Alan S. [REDACTED] Esq. + +1. 156. [REDACTED] + 358 El Brillo Way + Palm Beach, FL 33480 + +1. 157. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 18 of 22 + +c/o Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons +11349 SW 86TH Lane +Miami, FL + +158. Scott Rothstein +c/o Mark Nurik + +[REDACTED] + +159. Jeffrey Epstein + +160. [REDACTED] +c/o Adam Horowitz. +Horowitz Law + +[REDACTED] + +EXPERT WITNESSES + +161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. +c/o Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +[REDACTED] + +The following witnesses are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony, but may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of discovery in the prosecution of the Epstein claims. + +162. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esquire +Podhurst Orseck, PA +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 +Miami, FL 33131 + +163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire +Berger Singerman +300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards. + +Page 19 of 22 + +1. 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire + 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +2. 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire + Cohen Milstein + 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 + Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 +3. 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire + 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 + Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +4. 167. Isidro M. Garcia, Esquire + Garcia Law Firm, P.A. + 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 + West Palm Beach, FL, 33401 +5. 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire + Kubicki Draper + One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 + Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +6. 169. William Berger, Esquire + Weiss, Handler, Cornwell, P.A. + 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A + Boca Raton, FL 33431 + +Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this list. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 20 of 22 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of November, 2017. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +![](_page_161_Picture_24.jpeg) + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards: + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 21 of 22 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester Brewer, Esquire + +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff Bradley J. Edwards + +Page 22 of 22. + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire +[REDACTED] + +Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: [REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +[REDACTED] + +Tonja Haddad, P.A. + +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301. + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: [REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein: + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +[REDACTED] + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: [REDACTED] + +Fax: [REDACTED] + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein: + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, files this Amended Trial Witness List as + +follows: + +1. 1. Bradley J. Edwards + c/o Edwards Pottinger LLC + +[REDACTED] +FORT LADDERMAN, FL 33301-5260 + +1. 2. Scott W. Rothstein + c/o Marc Nurik + Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +[REDACTED] + +1. 3. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + c/o Fowler White Burnett + +4.. William J. Berger +c/o Greenspoon Marder + +[REDACTED] + +5. Jonathan Birkman +c/o Quraishi & Birkman, PLLC + +[REDACTED] + +6. Wayne Black +c/o Wayne Black & Associates +One Brickell Square + +[REDACTED] + +7. W. Chester Brewer, Jr. +c/o W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +8.. Robert C. Buschel +c/o Buschel Gibbons, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +9. Paul G. Cassell +c/o Hatch, James & Dodge, P.C. + +[REDACTED] + +10. Tonja Haddad Coleman +c/o Tonja Haddad; P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +N. Robert D. Critton, Jr. +c/o Critton, Luttier & Coleman; LLP + +[REDACTED] + +12. Pasquale (Pat) Diaz +c/o Pat Diaz & Associates, Inc. + +13. Abraxas (A.J.) Discala +Address Unknown + +14. Jane Doe +c/o Edwards Pottinger LLC +[REDACTED] + +15. Mercedes Estrada +Address Unknown + +16. Gary M. Farmer, Jr. +c/o Gary M. Farmer, Jr., P.A. +[REDACTED] + +17. Michael Fisten +c/o Blue Line Investigative Solutions. +[REDACTED] + +18. Christina Fitch +Address Unknown + +19. Shawn Gilbert +Address Unknown + +20. Scott A. Goldstein +c/o The Law Offices of Scott Goldstein, P.A. +[REDACTED] + +21. Cara L. Holmes +[REDACTED] + +22. Steven R. Jaffe +c/o Unchurch Watson White & Max +[REDACTED] + +23. Rodney J. Janis +c/o Goldberg Segalla LLP +[REDACTED] + +24. Kenneth C. Jenne +Address Unknown + +25. Jacquie Johnson +Address Unknown + +26. Denis A. Kleinfeld +c/o Kleinfeld Legal Advisors, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +27. Christopher E. Knight +c/o Fowler White Burnett + +[REDACTED] + +28. Dean R. Kretschmar +c/o Soaring Eagle Investments, LLC + +[REDACTED] + +29. Seth M. Lehrman +c/o Edwards Pottinger LLC + +[REDACTED] + +30. Michael Legamaro +c/o Legamaro Banipal LLP + +[REDACTED] + +31. George Levin +Address Unknown + +32. Charles H. Lichtman +c/o Berger Singerman LLP + +[REDACTED] + +33. Carl H. Linder +c/o Greenspoon Marder + +34. Mark T. Luttier +c/o Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP + +[REDACTED] + +35. [REDACTED] +c/o Edwards Pottinger LLC + +[REDACTED] + +36. Maribel Matiska +Address Unknown + +37. Priscilla Nascimento +Address Unknown + +38. Marc S. Nurik +c/o Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +[REDACTED] + +39. Michael J. Pike +c/o Pike & Lustig, LLP + +[REDACTED] + +40. Frank Prevé +Address Unknown + +41. Thane Ritchie +c/o Ritchie Capital Management +Address Unknown + +42. Patrick Roberts +c/o Blue Line Investigative Solutions + +[REDACTED] + +43. David Rogers + +[REDACTED] + +44. Alan B. Sakowitz +c/o Pointe Development Company + +- 45: Lilly Ann Sanchei c/o TelL!S Law Firm Four. Seasons Tower Suite 1200 46.. Jack Sparola +- rt Shipley,IP.A.. •c/o Conrad & Scherer LLP CO SA 4t. Williath IL Scherer Jack Simony c/oPlatinttni Partneri New York, NY +- 49. 'Susan K. Stirling o Proinise Healthcare. Inc. 50:. +- 51. .Debra Vil Address U '52. 'Linda Von Allthen Address Unknown :54. + +55. Beth Williamson +Address Unknown + +56. Ronald Wise +Address Unknown + +57. Phaedra Xanthos CPA CEE + +![](_page_171_Picture_23.jpeg) + +58. Any and all witnesses listed by Bradley J. Edwards, depending on their testimony in Edwards' case in chief. + +REBUTTAL WITNESSES: + +59. Katherine W. Ezell + +![](_page_171_Picture_27.jpeg) + +60. Allan M. Garten + +![](_page_171_Picture_29.jpeg) + +61. Adam D. Horowitz + +c/o Horowitz Law + +![](_page_171_Picture_32.jpeg) + +62. Amy Josefsberg-Ederi + +c/o Miami Dade State Attorney's Office + +![](_page_171_Picture_35.jpeg) + +63. Robert C. Josefsberg + +c/o Podhurst Orseck, P.A. + +SunTrust International Center + +![](_page_171_Picture_39.jpeg) + +64. Stuart S. Mermelstein + +c/o Herman Law Firm, P.A. + +![](_page_171_Picture_42.jpeg) + +65. Richard H. Willits +c/o Richard H. Willits, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +66. Iliana Yarzabal +c/o Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +Brickell Arch + +[REDACTED] + +67. Any and all witnesses whose names appear in depositions, interrogatories or documents produced in response to requests for production provided by Bradley J. Edwards depending on the testimony in Edwards' case in chief. + +EXPERT WITNESS + +68. D: Culver (Skip) Smith III +Culver Smith III, P.A. + +[REDACTED] + +Subject Matter: Mr. Smith will testify as to legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause and professional reputation. + +Substance of the Facts and Opinions: The pleadings and information that was available before the original civil proceeding was initiated and discovered during the pendency of the original civil proceeding and deposition testimony. + +Summary of Grounds for Each Opinion: Mr. Smith has not reached his final opinions. + +Curricula Vitae: A copy of Mr. Smith's Curricula Vitae is attached as Exhibit A. + +Epstein reserves the right to list and/or call any and all newly discovered witnesses upon proper notice and to call and/or produce any and all additional witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal. Epstein reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this Witness List upon proper notice to the parties and the Court. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on December 15, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +[REDACTED] [fax] + +By: */s/ Scott J. Link* + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: [REDACTED] + Primary: [REDACTED] + Primary: [REDACTED] + Secondary: [REDACTED] + Secondary: [REDACTED] + Secondary: [REDACTED] + Secondary: [REDACTED] + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +Jack Scarola + Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +*Bradley J. Edwards* + +Nichole J. Segal + Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 + 444 West Railroad Avenue + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +[REDACTED] + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +*Bradley J. Edwards* + +Bradley J. Edwards +Edwards Pottinger LLC +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +[REDACTED] +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* +Bradley J. Edwards + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik: +One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] +*Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein* + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +[REDACTED] +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +Jeffrey Epstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8c2437fd4710fc3f6e9f5e47919fb95ce77c12f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/EFTA02764423.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,7143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 175, + "chars": 454369, + "elapsed_seconds": 86.3, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Diagram_6.jpeg", + "_page_34_Picture_18.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_26.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_31.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_35.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_37.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_39.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_41.jpeg", + "_page_161_Picture_24.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_23.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_27.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_29.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_32.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_35.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_39.jpeg", + "_page_171_Picture_42.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 494.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 494.90999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 161.19 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Sex Offender Documents Were Not an Issue on the Joint Pretrial Stipulation, are an Irrelevant Sideshow, and If Allowed, Would Create Reversible Error Based on its Prejudicial Impact", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 214.64999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Sex Offender Registry Information is Improper Character Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Sex Offender Registry Information is Improper Impeachment Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 478.58400000000006, + 611.55 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 611.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Sex Offender Registry Information is Inadmissible Hearsay", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 582.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 373.40999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.3713073730469, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.3713073730469, + 125.2498779296875 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 125.2498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 463.896, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 463.896, + 372.6 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 372.6 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 416.34000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 468.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M. \nCase No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG \nCounter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J. Edwards, Second kmended Exhibit List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.89288330078125, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 77.89288330078125, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 156.32999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 313.47 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 313.47 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 370.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.896, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 152.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 90.202 AND 90.203", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.404, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 441.252, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 351.53999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 160.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "West's Florida Statutes Annotated Title VII. Evidence (Chapters 90-92) Chapter 90. Evidence Code (Refs & Annos)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Credits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 214.64999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Offender Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.152, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 28.152, + 56.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Offender Photos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 32.436, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 32.436, + 270.54 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Addresses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 664.1999999999999 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 664.1999999999999 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 677.9699999999999 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 677.9699999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LaW Enforeement Agency Having Jurisdiction Di", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 520.2974853515625 + ], + [ + 271.37432861328125, + 520.2974853515625 + ], + [ + 271.37432861328125, + 534.9099731445312 + ], + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 534.9099731445312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Conviction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 122.19080352783203, + 551.61 + ], + [ + 122.19080352783203, + 564.9611358642578 + ], + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 564.9611358642578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Description", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 665.01 + ], + [ + 80.51048278808594, + 665.01 + ], + [ + 80.51048278808594, + 678.5811233520508 + ], + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 678.5811233520508 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Date of Crime", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 697.41 + ], + [ + 90.19943237304688, + 697.41 + ], + [ + 90.19943237304688, + 711.5811233520508 + ], + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 711.5811233520508 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Date Convicted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 730.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 96.4063720703125, + 730.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 96.4063720703125, + 744.2111206054688 + ], + [ + 22.031999999999996, + 744.2111206054688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Victim Sex/Age", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 37.26 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 49.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Arresting Agency", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 103.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Offense Descriptions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 127.29599999999999, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 127.29599999999999, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Relationship to Victim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 179.01 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 179.01 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 191.16 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Weapon Used", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 223.56000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Force Used", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 255.96000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Computer Used", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 289.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pornography Involved", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 322.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sentence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 354.78000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Previous Conviction(s) Requiring Registration", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 397.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supervising Agency Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 428.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Special Conditions of Supervision", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 458.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Maximum Expiration Date/Post Release Supervision Date of Sentence:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 489.23999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scars, Marks & Tattoos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 519.21 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Names/Agencies", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 537.0300000000001 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 537.0300000000001 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 549.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Current Vehicles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 22.644, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 579.96 + ], + [ + 22.644, + 579.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 375.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 376.65000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT PRETRIAL STIPULATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 373.40999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Stipulated Facts:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 242.18999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 214.64999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Try the Case:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 216.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Number of Peremptory Challenges Per Party: Three;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 387.396, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 387.396, + 448.74 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 448.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Each Party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 488.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 392.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 392.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 421.20000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 473.84999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scoff Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 123.3521728515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 123.3521728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Counter-Plaintiff's, Bradley J. Edwards, Second Amended Exhibit List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 149.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 498.16799999999995, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 469.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 300.51 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 226.44, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 226.44, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 327.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 115.83 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.212, + 320.66400000000004 + ], + [ + 458.91999999999996, + 320.66400000000004 + ], + [ + 458.91999999999996, + 381.004 + ], + [ + 147.212, + 381.004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.232, + 351.69599999999997 + ], + [ + 465.476, + 351.69599999999997 + ], + [ + 465.476, + 381.00399999999996 + ], + [ + 144.232, + 381.00399999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.99599999999998, + 446.51599999999996 + ], + [ + 369.52, + 446.51599999999996 + ], + [ + 369.52, + 460.308 + ], + [ + 238.99599999999998, + 460.308 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- ,,M..v. Jeffrey Epstein \n15'1'. Judicial.dicuittase No;.50-200&CA.,028651)0CXX1VIB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.94, + 196.53600000000003 + ], + [ + 461.5173645019531, + 196.53600000000003 + ], + [ + 461.5173645019531, + 225.84400000000002 + ], + [ + 157.94, + 225.84400000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMI ii. Jeffit Epsfeli; \u2022 \n.USDC Si/ Fla; taseNo. 09;CV-81092 _", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.55999999999997, + 508.58 + ], + [ + 478.84722900390625, + 508.58 + ], + [ + 478.84722900390625, + 538.75 + ], + [ + 214.55999999999997, + 538.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "_. EIV..v..Jeffiiii 4.00A, \n1511'.JudieialCircuit Case No:.50200graA-628658,bOCXMB.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.27386474609375, + 642.19 + ], + [ + 470.1417236328125, + 642.19 + ], + [ + 470.1417236328125, + 676.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 89.27386474609375, + 676.6700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.5, + 101.716 + ], + [ + 380.844, + 101.716 + ], + [ + 380.844, + 116.37 + ], + [ + 223.5, + 116.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.048, + 101.716 + ], + [ + 345.67999999999995, + 101.716 + ], + [ + 345.67999999999995, + 116.37 + ], + [ + 261.048, + 116.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 282.50399999999996, + 131.886 + ], + [ + 500.63999999999993, + 131.886 + ], + [ + 500.63999999999993, + 173.262 + ], + [ + 282.50399999999996, + 173.262 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.90800000000002, + 382.728 + ], + [ + 485.1439999999999, + 382.728 + ], + [ + 485.1439999999999, + 411.1739999999999 + ], + [ + 132.90800000000002, + 411.1739999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.452, + 488.75399999999996 + ], + [ + 391.572, + 488.75399999999996 + ], + [ + 391.572, + 503.4079999999999 + ], + [ + 260.452, + 503.4079999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 368.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 427.788, + 432.54 + ], + [ + 427.788, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 447.12000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 470.62800000000004, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 470.62800000000004, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 439.02 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.4000015258789, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 99.70758056640625 + ], + [ + 76.4000015258789, + 99.70758056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 456.552, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 456.552, + 530.55 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 530.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 361.692, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 361.692, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 154.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 375.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REBUTTAL WITNESSES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 270.54 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 358.632, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 358.632, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 296.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 382.5, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 495.72 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Diagram", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 222 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 225 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 265 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 103 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 14 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 59 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 224 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 320 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 333 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 391 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 399 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 374 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 323 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 236 + ], + [ + "Line", + 115 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 228 + ], + [ + "Line", + 114 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 235 + ], + [ + "Line", + 113 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 203 + ], + [ + "Line", + 99 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 62 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764423" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_161_Picture_24.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_161_Picture_24.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9cba764ebb90ab2c4f7abd6c34b23151eacb2d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_161_Picture_24.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fbcda530c95332c9d4d8d0f395d1f650c088439a23cc52d99382a57dcf24fb5e +size 3627 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_23.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d81cf364f3c6b31e2cb36f6870873a1b39feb20c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_23.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d5038db10f4836b2d272046f0e5f1414b1eda83d925bdeeae30aad72e7a60da9 +size 2366 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_27.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_27.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..211ea40dc86479d2a2a47357eb605ae464143858 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_27.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a13f4f097182cd252c5de66692db6e3ac7b2f85172f72c89f2cc82e169afe57c +size 2398 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_29.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_29.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8abb0571dea576504d82ac3c2439654a76b7b458 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_29.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:969c00aea89123107393ce1144c6471ec7308ae8d9c444a9e3c36f36732ef003 +size 1911 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_32.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_32.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a70c69357aa5c34fa9109c16d9a845ea0d05417 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_32.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4f2cc49f32e8108fe6be271a7387ff733648ad3d4a2b187afa9cf5328c957f76 +size 2184 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_35.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_35.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cccae5688de83fc2652019134325ceac532b3c63 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_35.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:319aaf43b0a489db4630e7c9aa81688033976fe3cb40d6605f4e461c73027797 +size 1845 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_39.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_39.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9104debeb9d4f2f2f1950abe6e3518bb07d32ce9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_39.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:84ecaf6d33200d79bb08bda493f32ddce2f9e7b6371083a7052b55d9a718262b +size 3077 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_42.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_42.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4235a4d3572864d3d27dad1cf3098ae9cb2f1bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_171_Picture_42.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dffd197a9b8e2fc7d59b8978ae616bff08ab0fd9dc126bb39a11740424ae61e9 +size 2172 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_34_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_34_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf4540f52cc055ad8114d4734edca5be4e8203bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_34_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eebef4c0a750dd35401f4d96e2cb3f50820a213a50b5eff112d062e8228222ea +size 7758 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4342c95fecb6ced60b7bb483cc6117e9b2a71dba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ca030e5e2e82ad1273f3df102244847e1458513f230e575bb1d0bf263835e39 +size 27757 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_31.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_31.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6f1fc1079d28a374043cd127cece816406a06af --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_31.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6256b11f5fbce6dae38c5184507cc04bda8342b3a98af0b22dc316384f6d35b1 +size 9481 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92b18e4ad37ee1262d3867d6c8f154687e7321bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_33.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1a17c3a5cc544caede0f3d1fc1577db23bd31c27cfe1e1b69d94873257dc2bc3 +size 9554 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_35.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_35.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bb2cb3fed3217df2f518ccdb31c6a6fa3cc4fda0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_35.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e444f95b45912ead9ffc9beab3bbdc52f861e373697633092ebfd819a6aa0dff +size 8766 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_37.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_37.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec306df5d8070870b6ec08cbb4d7df709dab41aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_37.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e283d9409a741f96efd5b000ec4311a668aab6b6b29f4b7421cd53a27492cfce +size 10221 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_39.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_39.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7454cd57dd27f5e3f7d112877836279342875d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_39.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c723499c754d541467aecc0b812c30e49be51db32dd0c627a6a91739a016b40c +size 8540 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_41.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_41.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5dc2b57d3db69f12fdf907ba25da25e91d52c094 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_37_Picture_41.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b267261b78f6274b6ef0ae462c611158979027f1b44280c10cc1b5a9710b602e +size 9905 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_5_Diagram_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_5_Diagram_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..30b6da2bceb2e8810640a0d3df2f0552c4c19b3b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764423/_page_5_Diagram_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:25da378d2863539c3f5ef4e32d35e3fd4449168e59234e9669c1fdbb2690b396 +size 24629 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e54ee96344d2514b6b8e1164ffe5605df5b45ac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S +DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the MOTION TO LIFT +CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL +SETTLEMENT INFORMATION, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised +in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Thax the nursion is granted as + +to those cases in which Gradley Edwards +more received or participated both before and after the + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11 + +day of Jun, 2018. + +![]()DONALD HAFELE +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +Epstein filed the subject lawruit. (P) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstein's +Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw. Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrockla Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Phone: (561)-727-3600 S 9 Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire mare@nuriklaw.com AfILIS One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301N7 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothst gin oilir \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02d7ba73de3081515fe8c129846569c672d02d14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598/EFTA02764598.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764598.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3171, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 386.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 176.57999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764598" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9ea6d947ff984d2af9da0b6aa21d25319303491 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XJDOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaint! cancels the following hearing at the time s , before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach Cit Co e ouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10C, West Palm Beach, Florida 3 fendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby + +MOTION: Defen Co ter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, M on to mpel Substantive Responses to Request to Produce Served Ap 011 [D.E. 972] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, otion to Compel Substantive Responses to Request to Produce Served December 21, 2012 [D.E. 973] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Requests for Admissions Served February 26, 2013 [D.E. 974] + +> Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Interrogatories Served December 21, 2012 [D.E. 975] + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey ia's November 27, 2017, Omnibus Response in Opposition to Four Motions to Compel [D.E. 1091] + +DATE: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attoeslistd on the Service List below on February 12, 2018, through the Court's e-filing po al pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach evard, Suite 301 West Palm Bea' 33401 (561) 727-3 27-3601 [fax] + +B + +,6r l atl a M. Many (FBN 26680) (FBN 602991) rard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) ?cli mary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troyglinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice©IinIcrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cd6343db38e01761c3cc66feeaaef1addbb661c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601/EFTA02764601.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764601.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6252, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 444.31199999999995, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 210.363037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 210.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764601" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..766d1ea2f20d7733a2bc90944a4419a5f03352db --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.md @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X3OCCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +circumstances. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2th day of February, 2018. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +David P. Vitale Jr. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppella Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 Phone: (561)-721-0400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linlcrocklaw.com; Scott@linlcrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linIcrocklaw.com;Tanya®Iinlcrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Plaintiff(s), + +![](_page_5_Picture_203.jpeg) + +Defendant(s). + +![](_page_5_Picture_205.jpeg) + +**ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S +DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION** + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *thax the notion is granted as* + +*to those cases in which Gralley Edwards more ruled or participated both before and after DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11* + +day of July, 2018. + +![]()Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +*Epstein filed the subject (await).* + +staftelde@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 J. IIIM Esquire + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM DAG Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstcin's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA scarolateam@searcvlaw.com 40A Jack Scarola. Esquire 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Fax: 561-383-9451 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Attorneys for J. + +CO '' + +"S C) + +Jack A. Goldberger. Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahone gr in Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P 250 Australian Avenue S. Suit West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffry Epst ' + +sq w.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com enbach. PA. Avenue, Suite 350 ch. FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for + +IN Berard Rockenbach. Esquire kara®Iinkrocklaw.com; tbermudez©flacivillaw.com Link & Rockenbach. P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAC Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link. Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com: Tina@linkrocklaw.com 4041ac Scott J. Link. Esquire Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com; Kara@Iinkrocklaw Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com; Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com; tina®Iinkrockla .corn Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Phone: (561)-727-3600 iS A)C) Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com ( S" One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3ad7bb700c85e38eb703940c2b4a0338c51970c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/EFTA02764604.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 7320, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.32, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Picture_203.jpeg", + "_page_5_Picture_205.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SECOND MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S \nDISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 529.2465209960938, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 529.2465209960938, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 356.3382873535156, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 356.3382873535156, + 127.863037109375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 127.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.896, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 140.13 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 525.708, + 395.28 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 395.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 351.3776550292969, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 351.3776550292969, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 184.68 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 251 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764604" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_203.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_203.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ffccae008db710baa0c6e1c28ba6bb1d83f2cad --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_203.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3bd5936a137332a50b1ecac3bd1133cd1a458d658d6224f05ec9bffdae295caa +size 4667 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_205.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_205.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7dffea89a908a4bbbad1610cf75f93d2bc803fd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764604/_page_5_Picture_205.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b247a179d611eacb2bef6bffe981befbd5bb87a35389594630e410832cc058c +size 10996 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..192fb5ac15ab3e3aaa702a6c4f7ab769edf45063 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800=0CMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION iii ARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti cancels the following uniform motion cal Sar ., Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in C' a the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North fendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby g on the date stated below, before the Dixie Highway, Courtroom IOD Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Plainti -Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's October 5, 2017, Motion for S ions uant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Ag laintiff/Counter-Defendant J. and His Counsel + +O Thursday, February 15, 2018 + +? Se Eafendant/Counter :Counter Plaintiff J. ' November 8, 2017, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Sanctions [D.E. 1041] + +14. TIME: 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scott®Iintkljtw.com Angela M. Many (F Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservicealinkrocklaw.com + +(SS1 E' rCounsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3811b4704c8bd1914e9ba392345da859835f9a96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612/EFTA02764612.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764612.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5489, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION \niii ARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 446.58380126953125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 446.58380126953125, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764612" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d750dc6fa6986952f19c9850bb4c3ad840900597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.md @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800,OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## ,^ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOT1ON14 LIMINE AS TO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION + +cos + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. d rough undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Epstei ' n in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information, and as grounds therefore sta tdl as follows: + +# gnstein's Net Worth is a Factual Issue in Dispute + +Epstein's Motion in Limine repeatedly claims that documents containing circumstantial evidence of Epstein's net worth are not relevant to any factual issue in dispute pursuant to the parties' Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation. That statement is clearly false. Specifically, Part 2(K) of the Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation confirms that one of the issues of fact for determination at trial is "[w]hat amount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages as punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against and/or as a deterrent to others." See Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation at p. 10, 12. + +Although Epstein alleged that he was a billionaire in the Initial Complaint, he has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege as to all punitive damage net worth discovery. is entitled to an adverse inference jury instruction as a result of these assertions, and that request is the subject of a separate motion. See Atlas v. Atlas 708 So. 2d 296, 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 199Sgt Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976)). + +intends to also use the detailed asset informatio 's sex offender registration as evidence of Epstein's substantial net worth. As of h istration in New York, Epstein was required to list all homes, vehicles, and pl owns. The registration page submitted by Epstein himself shows that Epstein o residential properties, dozens of vehicles, and at least one airplane. Certainly t evidence that Epstein is a man of significant net worth, and is consistent wjQ is 'med status as a billionaire. + +Epstein's sex offender regi ormation is therefore relevant to a factual issue in dispute: the amount of punitive'damage that may be awarded by the jury. See Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So 2d 639, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("To be relevant, evidence must tend to prove or disproyei material fact."). + +# Epstein's Prejudice Argument is Circular Reasoning That Leads Directly Back to Him + +Epstein built the alleged prejudicial playing field he now complains of. In the Initial Complaint, Epstein claimed that had "manufactured" sexual abuse lawsuits on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, lawsuits that were "weak and had minimal value" . . . "for the sole purpose of continuing [Scott Rothstein's] massive Ponzi scheme." Initial Complaint at ¶ 42(h) & 30. Epstein referred to himself as a victimized "Palm Beach Billionaire," as follows: + +. . . the Litigation Team [which included I took an emotionally driven set of facts involving alleged innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach Billionaire and sought to turn it into a gold mine. Rather than evaluating and resolving the cases based on the merits (i.e. facts) which included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by each of the claimants . . . + +Id. at ¶ 49 (emphasis added). And Epstein referenced the Non-Prosecution Agreeiient, which establishes his status as a convicted sex offender. Id. at ¶ 42(1). So, Epstein that he was a billionaire, confirmed the existence of the Non-Prosecution Agreem C required him to ) plead guilty to sex crimes and register as a sex offender), and alle () ed "each of the claimants" against him were liars. A + +Epstein's Complaint, on which maliciOas Pipiecution counterclaim is premised, therefore injected all of the prejudicial circumstances of which Epstein now complains. Consistent with his burden of proof, will establish that Epstein lacked probable cause to make these malicious allegations. In defense oft malicious prosecution counterclaim, Epstein has listed . ft— 'N numerous media articles on which he apparently intends to rely. These articles, to which has raised no objection, variably label Epstein as a convicted child molester and pedophile. For example: + +245 1 : Describing Epstein as a "Palm Beach sex offender" + +Describing Epstein as a "billionaire sex offender" + +n's Exhibit 246 A : "The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein" + +Epstein's Exhibit 246(C): "Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say" + +Epstein's counsel has also made clear that he intends to establish Epstein's probable cause by, in part, showing that was attempting to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Thus, not only is Epstein responsible for every prejudicial allegation that he chose to make in the maliciously-filed Initial Complaint, his defense of this case is putting at jugci ithe very gci circumstances he claims are prejudicial, which are instead relevant and materi . State v. Gad, 27 So. 3d 768, 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ("[I]n order for relevant, prob: ce to be deemed unfairly prejudicial, it must go beyond the inherent prejudice 2ecl with any relevant evidence."). + +### 7, nrlusion + +The amount of punitive damages, if any, that may be assessed against Epstein is an issue . to be determined at trial. The detailed asset information that Epstein provided as part of his registration as a sex offender-is relevant and material evidence to that contested issue, and there is no unfair prejudice from introducing this evidence because Epstein has already put his status as a convicted sex pffender at issue through the filing of the Initial Complaint and his apparent defense strategy. Thus, Epstein's Motion in Limine should be denied. + +"S C) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15 day o , 201 + +ola + +ori a Bar No.: 169440 + +avid P. Vitale Jr. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and + +nunccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561)686-6300 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebd8b92505f038573198b858c8b930bcebfd343e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615/EFTA02764615.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764615.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 7906, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 534.8367919921875, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 534.8367919921875, + 113.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 113.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ",^ \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOT1ON14 LIMINE AS TO SEX \nOFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.964, + 317.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 515.4681396484375, + 317.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 515.4681396484375, + 357.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 89.964, + 357.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "gnstein's Net Worth is a Factual Issue in Dispute", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 429.0335693359375, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 429.0335693359375, + 466.10302734375 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 466.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Prejudice Argument is Circular Reasoning That Leads Directly Back to Him", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 551.60302734375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 551.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "7, \nnrlusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 336.72918701171875, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 336.72918701171875, + 419.2330017089844 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 419.2330017089844 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 134.46 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764615" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60cc37eda8a68bf863f5834459763427b37e9245 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.md @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +MOTION FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING EPSTEIN'S FIFTH AMENDMENT ASSERTIONS TO FINANCIAL DISCOVERY AND APRIL 15, 2011 REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Counter-Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion for Adverse Inference Instructions Regarding Epstein's Fifth Amended Assertions to Financial Discovery and April 15, 2011 Request to Produce, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. Epstein his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination with respect to all north discovery regarding punitive damages. Pursuant to Judge November AtS e Order, the Court deferred on the issue of whether is entitled to an adverse e e jury instruction as a result of PlaintifffCounter-Defendant's Fifth Amendment assertions. +- 2. Specifically, Epstein has raised his 5'h Amendment privilege as to all net worth discovery, including in the following pleadings: + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG J. Motion for Adverse Inference Jury Instruction Page 2 of 4 + +- a. 7/9/13 Amended Response to Punitive Damage Production Request [all objected to on basis of privilege against self-incrimination] +- b. 7/10/13 Amended Responses to Net Worth Interrogatories [all objected to on basis of privilege against self-incrimination] +- c. 3/27/13 Responses to Request for Admissions [reque objected to on the basis of the privilege against self-incriminatio + +3. It is well-settled in Florida that "a court may draagsii rse inference against a party in a civil action who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination." See Atlas v. Atlas, 708 So. 2d 296, 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 308 (1976). >IS Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. + +4. is therefore entr verse inference jury instruction as to all Fifth Amendment assertions concerning runage net worth discovery. Sig id. + +( 5. In addition, Epstein obj ted to April 15, 2011 Request to Produce on the basis of his Fifth Amendment privilege. That discovery request sought communications between Epstein (and his agents) and any government official which relate to Epstein's sexual molestation of children, as follows: + +All documents\* constituting, reflecting, or relating to communications between [Epstein] or any agent of [Epstein], on the one hand, and .. . any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. + +6. By raising his Fifth Amendment privilege in this civil proceeding, [REDACTED] is entitled to an adverse inference jury instruction that communications exist between Epstein and the government evidencing that Epstein committed the crimes he was accused of committing. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting this Motion for Adverse Inference Instructions Regarding Epstein's Fifth Amended Assertions to Financial Discovery and April 15, 2011 Request to Produce, and awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of February, 2018. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..881dcaecf376b537e99c013501738daea71ec3b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622/EFTA02764622.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764622.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5096, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 153.89999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764622" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61c6bf37acb098f2aeadd442304fbc7d54b29e58 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +10 SEP 17 PM 3:39 +BUCK. CLERK. +FALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**MOTION TO EXPAND INTERROGATORIES** + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████████ J. Edwards, by and through the undersigned counsel, moves this Honorable Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 1.340(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, to increase the number of initial interrogatories permitted herein so as to allow for the filing of interrogatories in accordance with those attached, and in support of this motion, Defendant/Counterplaintiff would show: + +1. The Supreme Court has not approved a form of interrogatories for this type of action. + +2. The elements of the claims asserted and the nature and complexity of the factual circumstances giving rise to the claims are not susceptible to being adequately covered within the twenty-five (25) interrogatory limit. + +3. The elements of defenses asserted or expected to be asserted are not susceptible to being adequately covered within the twenty-five (25) interrogatory limit. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +- 4. The use of written interrogatories is the least burdensome, least expensive and most expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant/Counterplaintiff by which to obtain necessary information and narrow trial issues. +- 5. motion. +- 6. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant will not be prejudiced through the granting of this ) The foregoing factors and others to be presented u on hating of this Motion constitute good cause for increasing the number of initial inte "es permitted herein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct cop jregoing has been famished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached li day of Septerr er, 2010. + ++o + +Florid. o.: 169440 Sear nney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 213' 1m Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 383-9451 Attorney for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc3806ddfb921da0e4a8c137dd1b130815e3ed07 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626/EFTA02764626.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764626.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3200, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.51, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.818, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 304.818, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO EXPAND INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.346, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 425.41200000000003, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 425.41200000000003, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 176.346, + 349.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 350.84599999999995, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 350.84599999999995, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764626" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48dd319631cb5c35452d5f937039f2045d9cfc15 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.md @@ -0,0 +1,1341 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SC .41 T1RTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL AYTQI CORDING + +Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey ("Epstein"), moves to compel J. Edu'" , wards") to produce the April 7, 2011, audio recording of the telephone interview l inia M. and in support thereof, states: Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +### Introduction + +Epstein requests to compel to produce the audio recording of the telephonic intervi of g ta taken April 7, 2011. Pursuant to the "best evidence" rule, the mid' must be produced. Epstein appropriately requested the audio recording ailed to timely produce it. + +### Epstein's 2011 Discovery Request for Production of Audio Recording + +- 1. On May 17, 2011, M, in support of his Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Punitive Damages claim, filed the transcript of an April 7, 2011, telephonic statement of + +November 29 and December 5 and 7, 2017 this matter will be tried. In additio would be calling clients (E.W., L.M. or Jane Doerudestify live at trial. **3. Undersigned counsel appeared c on November I, 2017. At the , the Court made rulings that impacted how hose hearings, counsel stated that he eged victim of Epstein but not one of three** + +4. As a esult, on January 17, 2018, Epstein's counsel's office made a request to Edward's co ce for the audio tape of April 7, 2011, telephonic statement. D counsel's office has ignored this request. + +5. Furthermore, Second Amended Exhibit List, No. 106 identifies "Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto." Exhibit E, No. 106. While EM April 7, 2011, telephonic statement was used in this case, has not produced the audio portion. + +a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. The transcript indicates that ■ **was being recorded. Id.** + +**2. The audio recording should have been produced in response to Epstein's December 9, 2011, Request for Production. In that request, Epstein asked "Witness statements you intend to use in this case." Exhibit B, Request No. 7. were defined to include "recording of sound." Id., Instruction No. 7. Alth months before the Request was served filed the transcript of In d statement on which he relied and in fact used in this case, =t ) "None" to the request. Exhibit C, Request No. 7. to produce, "Documents" t a few ' telephonic** + +### **This Court's Recent November/Dec Prompted a Second Request for ' e e Rulings Recording** + +6. Epstein's counsel was not present during April 7, 2011, telephonic statement. Furthermore, from the face of the written transcript, it cannot be determined whether the statement was given under oath, nor does the transcript identify who transcribed it. + +# Florida Evidence Code Requires Production by of the Best Evidence + +Section 90.502, Florida Statutes, of the Florida Evidence Code provides that "an original writing, recording or photograph is required to prove the contents of the writ Sing, or 4) (holding that a tape recording, despite an available transcript and no dispute 's audibility, was still the best evidence of the tape's contents). photograph." See also v. State, 632 So. 2d 1099, 1100 (Fla. 10 + +Because the audio recording is the best evidence, ds' possession and properly requested by Epstein, should be compel! 1140, v. State, 189 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1' DCA 19 S ordings" of written transcripts of tape recordings were the best evidence). the audio recording. See Duggan + +Accordingly, Epstein resp ests that the Court compel to produce the audio portion o 7, 2011, telephonic statement. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 15, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldbergerOagwpa.com smahonev®aewpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +esA Co + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**NOTICE OF FILING** + +COMES NOW the Defendant/CounterClaimant, [REDACTED] [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files the attached transcript of the telephone interview of [REDACTED] to supplement the proffer made in support of Counter-Claimant's Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Punitive Damages. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 17 day of May 2011. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant/CounterClaimant +[REDACTED] + +FILED + +2011 MAY 17 PM 4:00 + +NOTICE OF FILED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Supplement + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +RE: adv. Epstein 291874 + +### PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT + +TELECON + +PARTICIPANTS: JACK BRAD + +DATE: April 07, 2011 + +JS: ack Scarola and Brad + +BE: H + +V: Hi Jack! Hi Brad! How you guys doing? + +JS: We're doing fine, thank you. I'm further, let me tell you, if I have want to be able to tape this co you? 1 of the trouble and before we go any ission, I have started a tape recorder and I atio from the very beginning. Is that alright with + +V: Sure, that's fine, Jack. 6\pr kl + +JS: Ok, good, thank you. •appleciate that. Let me start off by introducing myself. I know that Brad has sp l\ken,t2you about me but I am Brad's lawyer, and I assume that you can confirm I tha you -"&rhave never had any communication before. Is that right? + +V: That's c + +JS: have, however, gotten some information from Brad about conversations that ave had with him, and that will enable me, hopefully, to make this a little bit more fictent and take up a minimum amount of your time while still getting the information that we think is going to be helpful to us and to any jury that might ultimately have to hear these facts. + +So, let me begin by asking you first to tell us what your full name is. + +V: =. That's my maiden name. My married name + +JS: Could you spell your last name for us? That is your married last name: + +V: + +JS: Alright, thank you, and where are you living right now? + +V: I live in Australia. + +JS: And how long have you resided in Australia. + +JS: That is where you are right now, correct? We've reached you AuQtra ia for this phone conversation? + +V: This is my 19th year. + +V: That is correct, yes. + +JS: And what time is it in Australia right now? + +V: I think it's about 9:00 now. + +JS: Ok. That's 9am, correct? + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Alright. the re s conversation is because it is our understanding that you know a man by thciune ey Epstein, and I want to begin by asking you please to tell us about the circurrQykn s of your first meeting Mr. Epstein. + +V: Ok. I was intro to Mr. Epstein by Ghislaine Maxwell. I was working at Donald Trump's spa in -a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansio tk alm each that a / P\p fternoon after work to make some extra money and to learn abo assig She met me at the spa, and I was reading a book about anatomy, so I was already Injerested in massage therapy as it was and not having any of the education or 380ccivr anything behind me, I thought this was a great opportunity to work for her and go.:1So, I went to Jeffrey's mansion about 5 or 6 in the afternoon. My dad drove me re. My dad worked at Mar-a-Lago with me, and he met Ghislaine and she seemed like a nice, proper English lady, and she knows, I mean, you know, one time then \_once before I left to travel overseas, she just seemed really nice and like she would like to help me out. So my dad left, and I had no problem getting home that night, one of her drivers would take me back after my trial. So she led me upstairs, and into Jeffrey's bedroom, and past that is Jeffrey's massage room, which has got his steam room and a shower and a massage table, and there is actually an extra room that has, that nobody knows about it, it's kinds like a secret room and it's got a whole bunch of decorative pictures of pornographic literature and sex toys and I can ? what happened in there. + +JS: When you say that the room was hidden, [REDACTED] how was the room concealed? + +V: It wasn't like a door that you would normally go into, like some kind of special opening, you open that and then a little door, so it looks like it's a little closet so-to-speak, but when you walk in there, it's obviously a lot bigger than just a closet. It wasn't too big, but it was bigger, you know. It wasn't a gigantic room, it was just like a small room, which you know, it probably could fit some shoes in there, \_ it had racks of shoes, boxes, some sweatshirts neatly folded, and the ceiling to the floor was covered in pornographic pictures of the girls that he had met. + +JS: When you say... + +V: So anyways, that was getting there, and I was introduced to Jeffrey, he was laying naked on top of the massage table, and obviously for one, I'm a 15 year old girl and seeing him on the table was weird but, also learning about anatomy and massage, I thought this would be part of it. So obviously, I thought it was part of the massage program, so I said ok, this is fine. And, he then instructed me on how to touch the body, Jeffrey's body, how to massage him, and for the first hour, it was actually a real massage, maybe not an hour, maybe like 40 minutes or something, but of something like that \_ and that's when he turned over on the other side and to expose himself fully. So then Ghislaine told me that she wanted me to undress and began to take off my shirt and skirt, my [REDACTED] uniform from Mar-A-Lago, she also took off her shirt and got undressed, and so I was there with just my undies on, and she was completely bare, and made some kind of little flake about the underwear that I was wearing because it wasn't my normal sexy girl underwear and just like, I don't know, had red hearts on it or something like that; just your normal, you know, real cute underwear. Anyways, so during all of this I'm kind of like what's going on, how do I act, what do I say, I was so afraid of, not afraid or fearful for my life but \_ unsure of how all this started and wanting to obtain a profession \_ I was so afraid thinking about upsetting and disappointing them, I don't know, it's a weird situation by far and I was expected to \_ Lick his nipples, instructed on how to do so by J.E. and give him oral sex while he wanted to fondle me, and then at the end, I was told by Ghislaine to get on-top and straddle Jeffrey sexually, and when we were done, we went and had a shower in the room and Jeffrey told me to wash him up and down, you know with a bar of soap and make sure he was all cleaned up. And then he took me downstairs and took me to two of the guards and told John to bring me home. John was the [REDACTED] at the time. + +JS: Let me interrupt you for just a moment there if I could, [REDACTED] You mentioned as you were recounting those details that you were 15 years old at the time. What is your date of birth? + +V: August 9th, 1983 + +JS: And can you tell us please, as best you're able to estimate it, what the date was when this first encounter occurred? + +V: I've got it written down. It's like - I'm not good with math — hold on — I thought I wrote it down but I didn't. I'm not too sure, I think it was 1998 off the top of my head and around June of 1998, I would say as I was turning 16 at the end of the summer. JS: Alright. You talked about the room where Jeffrey had the pornographic photographs. Did you actually see that room on the occasion of your first visit there? V: No, I got to see that room a few visits after but I was just trying to des that oom to you guys so you knew exactly what room I was talking about. JS: Another question for you, and I don't mean to be plying into al life, and if I ask you any questions at all that you're uncomfortable answ g, filen you just tell me that and we'll move on, because I appreciate your cooperation d the last I thing I want to do is impose upon that cooperation, but can you tell -p ere just generally what kind of sexual experience you had had prior to this confron ibq th Jeffrey? V: Yeah, sure. A close family friend has sexually e, and I was on the streets at 13 years old. I was picked up by a 67 year old ed Ron \_Eppinger\_ who did exactly what Jeffrey did with me abuse and viol thfulness & I was with him for 6 months. So, he was gone and then i dl a,us j6yfriend who was like my school friend from young days but we just kept coat id with each other and we were on and off constantly, and that was Tony Ir ua. and there was also another younger guy was near my age, Michael, I can't cm'nt er his last name, but yeah, there, I mean, there wasn't like a string of men Ptui g, but there was Ron, like I told you, and he was the first guy expecting me t oi' ,. ailed disgusting affairs. Jeffrey actually knew Ron, which was quite weir when 1/ tOld Jeffrey the story about Ron, and Jeffrey had actually met him, and yeah. v just another story, and yeah, there were a couple of men, but that gives yc u an idea. JS: Now whe &you vcribed the photographs in the room as pornographic, tell me just a little bi ut the photographs, if you would please? First, how many of them were there V: 00, and like I said, they covered the room from the ceiling, not the ceiling but e top of the edge of the wall to the bottom of the floor. I want to say at least a widred, even more, there could have been more in the boxes \_Some of them were A4\_ photographs, like the large size, some of naked women posing, you know, positions, sexy positions. Others were, you know, some girls had bikinis on, and it wasn't so pornographic, but it was all women, and it was all in a sexual nature. JS: Were there photographs where more than one person appeared? V: yeah, plenty of them. There were lots of naked photographs, I mean I was just trying to give you a visual range. There was anything from 5x6s to 4x8s to 8x4s. Some of them + +had frames, some of them were out of frames, but they were all, like I said, they were all women, they were all sexual in nature. + +JS: Was it your impression that there were a hundred photos of a hundred different people or were there multiple photos of the same woman or girl? V: There was definitely a lot of different girls. I mean it wasn't easy to sit the and say, you weren't finding 5 girls out of some photos, no. Were there a hundred di t ones? There could have been pictures of some girls, I really couldn't get elo ems ly to actually recognize faces or anything like that. But if you, you 'mow, t ge of them were all different, majority of them were different, yeah. JS: Did there ever come a point in time when you became awarKihat photograph of you had been added to the collection? V: Yes, there was. Ghislaine took several nude photo f me for Jeffrey. So, yeah, there were pictures of me and there were picture e Tasn't shy, that wasn't the only place in his house that he kept the photos. 11,<1 splrotos all his house. If you looked in his den or on his desk or in on A teloal lile a giant table in his house, there were at least a hundred photos of g sh,qr es. Not all of them were naked, a lot of the ones that were all around his ho sey erc:fiot naked girls posing pornographically, some were pictures of celebrities a d politiZj he had 'mown or things like that or had pants on or whatever, but yeah, there wIt lot of mixed photographs in the outside ones. JS: Were there any photo s or young women that you knew or that you subsequently came to kn u saw in the house? V: there w e was pictures of II , pictures p'ctur pictures of me, pictures o t e regulars, but a lot of the girls, sometimes y could have like 7 girls a day, and he would only see those girls once if he of bo I don't know. These weren't my days. I heard he's gotten a lot sloppie e I le So, I don't know anyways, but when I knew him, there was just a, it see as such an influx of girls coming in and out, so did I recognize a lot of aybe, maybe not, but then they were all definitely beautiful, they were all age, some of them young, some of them older in their 20's, I mean it was just eh all beautiful. JS: You've told us about the first visit. Was there any discussion on the occasion of that first visit about your returning? V: Yes, they were very pleased with me and after the encounter was finished, the sexual encounter, he went and told me I did well and I have a lot of potential to become a massage therapist and if I'd like I could return tomorrow, you know, and do the same thing and get paid \$200/hr, so Jeffrey insisted that I come after work, and over the next few days, I guess the relationship grew into more, and within a couple of weeks, not even + +a couple of weeks, maybe a week, I had quit Mar-a-Lago and I was working for Jeffrey full time. + +JS: Ok, let's talk about your job at Mar-a-Lago, if we could. You said that your Dad was working there. What was his position at Mar-a-Lago? + +V: He was a maintenance supervisor I think is what it was called? He like tennis courts and air conditioners and things like that. aged the + +JS: What is your Dad's full name? + +V: Sky William= + +JS: And is he still living here in South Florida now? + +V: No, he's not, he's in California. + +JS: Ok. Is your Dad aware of what is currently'go(ng iyvsith regard to your having made public statements about your relationship wi + +V: Yes, he is well aware of it. I told my key n before all this stuff came out, because they were the first ones contacted yhmalists from Mail on Sunday. I know that they the Mail on Sunday printed I fia\*gone out and tried to, I mean I think one of the photos said that I was angry th effrey and the Prince walking together and that is why I came out and went lic th everything. Not true. I mean, I am angry about how they are still up to ek ys together and that they're still hanging out but I didn't contact the Mai on Sunday and I didn't bring it out. I figured that everyone was going to bring it outs ay and I better bring it out the right way. He's known everything from the start, and my family is very supportive with everything going on. + +JS: I'm kind o tgoing jump around a little bit and I apologize for that, but since the subject has cord t tell me first of all why you are providing this cooperation to us, and I am cert ery,dppreciative of it, but I want you to tell us why it is you've chosen to spend on the telephone and provide this information that you're now providing. + +V: t to help the bigger picture, you know, I think all of us can make a big difference in t of other people's lives and I think that this has gone on long enough and it's a big slap in my face that he can get away with hurting me so bad let alone so many other girls and laugh about it. I guess I talked to you guys out because I want to see the right thing happen, not just to him, but I want people in the world to understand this is not the way of life, you know, it's not acceptable to go out procure young girls and make them think that, this is the way you should be living and that's all. Yeah, I guess my reason for doing it is to help the bigger picture, you know, I'm a big believer in karma and I believe that good things will come back to you, so I guess that's why I'm doing this. + +JS: Just for the record, neither Brad, nor I, nor anyone representing that they have anything to do with us has made any promises to you. Is that correct? + +V: That is correct. I'll tell you, since this is our first conversation, that nobody has made me feel like I've been bribed or bought or had to say anything. I've told you anything that I know from my own self, not some things somebody told me. If anything, Brad's been extra careful not to tell me anything and let me do all the talking, so it's quite posite I think. + +JS: Alright. Let's get back then to the story of your relationship with effrx and we've talked about your first encounter with him and how it evolved fr r to your full time employment with Jeffrey, but what were you doing at M r-a-11 go efore you quit Mar-a-Lago? + +V: I was just a locker room attendant and sometimes r r ' bysitting for the rich and famous. So, I wasn't anything big. I worked in the That's why I was studying anatomy, because I was really really interested in a \_massage therapist\_, and at the locker room, I didn't do much. I mean I g tea for a living, I would, you know, make sure the toilet paper had a littletria in it after everybody went to the toilet, or wipe down the water from the bas' ow, it was a very easy peasy job. + +JS: Did you get that job through your D( + +V: Yes, my Dad got me the job. + +JS: Ok, and you were only 1 at the time, were they aware of how old you were at Mztr-a-Lago? + +V: Of course, deft e/y. We had to go through extensive, you know, we even had to get drug tested and t and so on and so forth. I mean, Mantas (?) is very strict on employme yeah verybody knew. + +JS: Ok. • th y ever any conversation with Ghislaine about how old you were before you we t,tak a to Jeffrey's mansion? + +: N he didn't ask me how old I was from the start, but when I did get to Jeffrey's pnsion, it was discussed how old I was. + +JS: With whom? + +V: During the entire hour of what I call the legitimate massage I was giving him, it was cat and mouse games getting information from me to find out who I am, am I a willing participant in these kind of things, and how would I react if they were about to take the next step. But they got information off of me, they got my age, they got my, a little bit of my history so they knew I was, you know, not very stable at home, and they knew that, you know, I was actually interested in making my life better by studying so what they were offering me was a chance to become a legitimate masseuse but it was getting trained. They would have people show me how to work the body and be called a massage therapist and get me books on it, and you know, keep me interested, and every time, you know, I was with Jeffrey, literally was about massages, I don't mean just going in and have sex with him. I mean massage, because it would always start out with massage and then it would lead into sometimes other things. + +JS: Alright, once this evolved. into full time employment, what did full t' e p yment mean? + +V: That was entirely having to travel with Jeffrey in every city. was in Palm Beach, I stayed at my apartment, and he would call me to his ouse once or twice a day sometimes, and that's, you know, do things with him. Sometim e'd go out shopping, sometimes we'd go out arid watch a movie. You know st le things like that, go to an expo or a fair, whatever it was. But when we other cities, I was at my apartment\_, I lived with him full time. What I mg time is even in the middle of the night, I could get a ring on my phone next t ell me to come in his room, you know, so it was literally full time. + +JS: When you say that when you were i /each you were living in your apartment, were you living on your own or ou Mng with members of your family at that time? + +V: No, after I y offered to get me an apartment in Palm Beach somewhere, Palm d it was a nice apartment. He furnished it for me, it was absolutely beauti ah, that's the only time I would spend time away from him really. + +JS: This apartment w Palm Beach Boulevard or out in the Village of Palm Beach? + +V: I so 3,5, °nit remember. I've been trying to rack my brain because the FBI was same thing and were trying to find it, but yeah, I'm Not sur . I didn't get to much time in it, I was only there about an entire week out of every month ly, but the majority of the time I "Edith Jeffrey anyways. It was somewhere in piiiim Beach. I don't know about Palm Beach drive. I don't even remember the Palm Beach drive anymore so I'm not too sure. + +JS: Ok, irjaa2 see if I can draw the distinction for you and maybe that will help you to help us? = Palm Beach is a village that is... + +V: No, no, no, I got Palm Beach, I just didn't know the Palm Beach Drive, like what street it's o o . Were you talking about a street? + +adv. Epstein Te ep one interview with Page 9 of 23 + +JS: Yes, I was talking about a street. Palm Drive is on the island of Palm Beach, and it's a street that is lined with larg palm trees, and I'm wondering if this was an apartment on the island or was this an apartment out west of town... + +V: No, it was actually in Palm Beach, not on the island. + +JS: Alright. + +V: I would be driven, it was closer to my family than it was closer to himAI)vite to be close enough to everybody else so that when I was in town, I cool nb, see them quickly. + +JS: Ok. So i we're not talking about Palm Boulevard. We talki g about the town of Palm west of town. Jeffrey got you an apartment out theti + +V: That's correct. + +JS: When he was in Palm Beach, you were generalki tying at the mansion, you were staying at the apartment that he got for you o el, town. + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Ok. + +V: I mean then there was tint nria say that every time I stayed at my apartment. There was times we'd fl 4 4om some city maybe too late at night to really want to go back home, so yoti ow, s like 12:00 at night or 1:00 in the morning. I was just staying in the yellow rcm r something like that; one of the guest rooms in Palm Beach. But majority of a time, I would definitely want to get back to my own apartment. + +JS: Alright. e general hours of your full time employment when ...? + +V: Ther et hours. It wasn't like logging, and you know, hitting the shift button, tl? e that. The way I would get paid would be, ok, if I was in Palm Beach, I ul ge \$200 an hour to massage Jeffrey or some of his friends and then go home. So it-w uld be like that. If I was traveling with him, it would be per massage, so I would be ejting paid per day. So I wouldn't be getting paid on an hourly rate. He wouldn't say ok, today you're going to work for me from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 at night. It never like that. I was on call all the time. + +JS: When you were here in Palm Beach, were you actually getting paid only for the time spent massaging Jeffrey or were you getting paid from your arrival at his house until you left the house? + +JS: From the time the massage started. Ok. + +V: Sometimes we'd go there and I would wait for a while or talk with Ghislaine and Jeffrey about something or we'd meet somewhere and talk about something. A lot of times, I'd meet him upstairs in his room where he was ready for me. But then there was a lot of times where it didn't start tight away, so he couldn't really pay me from the e I got there sometimes unless it was just paid from the time I massaged him til e the massage was over. + +JS: Alright. Did your duties for Jeffrey ever include anything oth massages and sex in connection with the massages? Did he Ve responsibilities to perform? pr viding him you any other + +V: I was asked to do the same things that I did to Jeffrey t well. Those were my duties. He looked at it thj professional massage therapist, and maybe I need erotic massages on a few people. of his fellow colleagues as that I was going to be a entele, so he had me perform + +JS: Did that start here in Palm Beach County + +V: It did. The first one did. + +JS: Ok, and how long after you II one of his friends? ky did he first ask you to provide services for + +V: About 9 months, I thi months and a year, w . It wasn't a full year, it wasn't 6 months, but between 6 by I'm saying 9 months. + +JS: And when you p services to a friend of Jeffrey's, who paid you for those services? + +V: 14. I would get paid the next time I saw Jeffrey, so if I was invited to the otylito give a massage, I would give a massage, I would go home, and the next saw Jeffrey, he would pay me for what I did. So, it was paid always by him, up by him, so he always knew what to pay me. I did get tips and things like tha ,-if you call it that, you know, like a hundred dollar tip or something from a few of pm, you know, yeah. + +JS: Was them .. + +V: There was always payment from Jeffrey. + +JS: Was there ever any discussion with Jeffrey about what was expected to happen when you provided massage services to one of Jeffrey's friends? + +V: In a roundabout way, yes. In so many ways, Jeffrey really really had to train me, and that was why Ghislaine said that she and Jeffrey enjoyed me so much was because they never really had to speak much to me to tell me what they wanted me to do. You know, I wasn't waiting for you know, their directions. Jeffrey would tell me to go give an erotic massage to friends. He wouldn't give me much detail about it, but he would say to treat them like you treat me. + +JS: Did he refer to it as an erotic massage or are those your words? + +V: Erotic massage is my words. That's exactly what it was, but he would me to treat them how he wanted it, so I'd do what he wanted without havin o me words more. I mean, I complied with what he wanted because it wa at of a, I don't know, I don't know how to say it, it was just very mindboggl hqw let him have so much control or power over me basically. The massages would. routine to what Jeffrey wanted with my so called new clientele, and with theii wn words would ask me to provide them with sexual pleasure after the massage. + +JS: Did you ever report back to Jeffrey about what when you provided massages to his friends? + +V: Of course, of course, and I knew th gITds were reporting back to him as well because there were times where he ,Kild ins gate conversation by saying you know, so and so had a great time, you did dap!, you know so and so gave me a call and told J.E how it went ... + +JS: Did Jeffrey ever elicit de you? "Tell me what happened, describe in detail what went on?" + +V: No, but he wou d have augh, he had a laugh with me a few times about some of their different manne sr I guess you would say, like some of them, one guy had a foot fetish and t w4really weird and I mentioned it to Jeffrey, and we would have a laugh over ft. rdn't want to know details. He wasn't asking me "so tell me what did you guys Tri jiy." No, he just basically gave me a slap on the back and said, you know, d we had some kind of conversation about it. I can't recall any conversation of my head. I really don't know one. It's been that long. But yeah, we did out it briefly. + +IS: Can you give me an estimate as to the number of friends for whom Jeffrey provided and paid for your services? + +V: There was about, you know, I don't know, 8 guys possibly. + +JS: And are you able to name those people for me? + +adv. Epstein Te ep one interview with Page 12 of 23 + +V: No, not at this stage. I just, some of these people are really influential in power, and I don't want to start another shitstorm with a few of them. I'll tell you that there was some erotic massages given to, I'm just afraid to say it to you. + +JS: Ok, + +V: It's like geez, I don't know if I want to, I'm really scared of where this is go + +JS: Alright. I understand that, and as I told you from the beginning, if I as estion that you are uncomfortable answering, you just tell me that, and I ' I ve on, and I understand that at least right now, you are uncomfortable answeri D certainly going to respect that. + +V: Thank you so much, Jack. + +JS: No, that's quite alright. I am very appreciate of the don't want you at any time to feel that we are takip so give me the information that you're comfo4b1 where you're uncomfortable, I will respect on you are providing, and I mr) dvantage of that cooperation, g me, and if we get to a point 11 move on from there. + +V: Ok. + +JS: I want to talk a little bit about the, g that you did with Jeffrey. About how long into your relationship with him6 id a irst start? + +V: Immediately. I started l.. fa lmn mmediately. Not internationally until I think about, Gosh, I can't remembf c even \*nk it was a year later that we started doing international travel. Maybe like 9 nkS,41 to a year again. Not too sure to be honest. + +JS: So that would ha n approximately the summer of 1999? Somewhere around there? + +V: Sgfqwhere around there. Somewhere around a year, somewhere around there, I .5111 it exactly. But like I said, we started doing domestic traveling ly, so my first destination with him was New York and Santa Fe and the California, I would take trips with him occasionally. Sometimes we would go Louis or New Orleans or Santa Cruz. We were traveling just about everywhere I + +JS: How did you travel? + +V: Well, we took Jeffrey's private jet, and unless I was being sent somewhere by myself for what we were just talking about before, then I would travel on a what do you call, a public jet, whatever it is... + +M adv. Epstein e interview with Page 13 of 23 + +V: Yes. Just a normal flight, an e-ticket. + +JS: Like the rest of us common folk. + +V: But when I was traveling with Jeffrey, the majority of the time would be on the black jet. + +JS: Now, when you say there would be times when you would travel by yourself se he was sending you somewhere, tell me about that. How did that come abo + +V: So, one of his colleagues would be at the Carribean or Santa Fe e e N w York, or wherever, and he would call me up on those days where I am n with him or in Palm Beach with him, and he would ask me to get on the nex Ian to so and so and go meet so and so, and that's when I would take e-tickets. His se to or special assistant, whatever, would organize it for me and give me the deJgiis d I would just walk up the line and they'd let me right through. + +JS: Can you give me any ideas as to how many t ppened that Jeffrey would send you off to meet some friend of his at some lo tde of Palm Beach? + +V: How many times it happened? I'm not ure robably about 10-15 times. + +JS: Ok. And on those occasions, ho ~mtlelytime would you spend with one of Jeffrey's friends when you were sent to that you would have to travel to? + +V: Only a couple of days. O that's it. + +JS: And how were you pa14 or hose trips? + +V: I would be paid t upon my arrival back with Jeffrey. So, whenever I was back with Jeffrey, he uld unt up how many days I've had, sometimes give me even more than what I ed, not deserved, but what I earned and give me a little extra. + +JS: W i a daily rate for those trips or was that per massage also? + +V: -Per-,Massage. With Jeffrey, I would be honest. I wouldn't tell him I did 15 massages if I i/cIn't. He knew he could trust me. He could always come back to the other person that he sent me to give massages and ask them as well, so you know, it was always by per massage. + +JS: Alright. When we've been talking about massages, tell me exactly what it is we're talking about when we speak about massages. + +V: Same thing I would do to Jeffrey. Again, it would start out as a massage, which would + +start with them being naked, and me giving him a legitimate massage to begin with, so + +I'd start with his feet, go up to his calves, up his legs, buttocks, back, his neck, his head, his arms, yada yada, and then it would be time to flip over, and some of the men would want me to continue on massaging the front side of them and they would instigate me to begin having sex with them or foreplay, whatever you want to call it. + +JS: So routinely, these massages involved sexual activity. Is that accurate? + +V: That is accurate. + +JS: Ok. Let's talk about the travel that you were involved in when you private plane. Generally speaking, who were the passengers o traveled. on Jeffrey's e when you + +V: Well, Larry was the pilot, and then there was a short, small s id\_ ty, I don't know his name, but he was a co-pilot, and then he changed and was another guy brought in Generally speaking, there was always Jeffr times Ghislaine, sometimes sometimes a whole bunch of other girls toes famous people, sometimes some politicians or yeah, just about anybody cptiki if his plane. There was never no any set routine who would come and who alch It was an influx of people on Jeffrey's airplane. + +JS: I want to deal with these things that you have, so I'm going to with Jeffrey on his plane whe there was any sexual activi implicate any of these f names of the people arc.that ely~)I(order to respect some of the reservations ho the people were that you remember flying re personally present without regard to whether un-ed on the plane or not. So I'm not asking you to ople in improper conduct, but just tell me what the remember that you consider to be famous people. + +V: Ok, there was aomi C pbell, Heidi Klum, there was Bill Clinton. There was Al (7) Gore, there was e bunch of models, I wouldn't really honestly be able to give their names. T ere w att Groning the producer of the simpons cartoon, Jack CCousteau's grandd ter a lot of interior designers, architects, politicians. I am just trying to think of as a y n hes as possible for you. Off the top of my head, that's as good as I can get + +JS: right, that's fine. And again, I am not implying by my questions, nor do I want qur answers to be interpreted as your suggesting that any of those people that you have just identified were engaged in any improper activities on any particular flight, but I want to talk to you now about what went on on occasion on the airplane. Ok? + +V: Ok. It was a lot of the same thing that went down on the ground. A lot of times, it would be just be me and Jeffre or me and Jeffrey and Ghislaine, or me and Jeffrey and some other girl, sometimes . There would be sexual conduct, there would be foreplay, there was a bed in there, so we could basically reenact exactly what was happening in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off with foreplay, sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies. + +JS: Were there occasions when you were in Jeffrey's company, whether on the ground or in the air, where there were other girls present whom you knew to be under age 18? V: Yes. There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we we all very young. On occasion, there was some older girls, and I don't mean older as ' ik in their 30s or anything, I mean like 28, 29, something like that, just very rarely nty of the girls that Jeffrey actually met or had on his plane or in his house were er age. JS: Do you know how it is that Jeffrey established with any of these girls? V: Yes, I do. He would send me personally or with other girls to t:tr shops, to \_pick up anywhere, I mean we were constantly on the look fQFQtler girls that might satisfy Jeffrey. JS: What instructions were you given about what to, l'a V: Young, pretty, you kno fun person ey couldn't be black. If they were any other descent other than =, they ha wally beautiful. That was just about it. JS: Who gave you those criteria? V: They both gave us the instru it wasn't just me, Jeffrey asked most girls to bring a friend and make extra ey would use us young girls So that way it probably looked a lot more safe at we were procuring to younger girls that were already doing it. That was the at Jeffrey had it. JS: Were you given truction at all on how to approach these girls? V: Yes. vT y and Ghislainc both taught me to, depending on the circumstances, depe 'the girl, you could offer them a job as a massage therapist or you could tell the y ave a really rich friend with, you know, great contacts in the acting world or world and he loves pretty girls, you should come back and meet him, make -some.tnoney, you know, we had a whole bunch of ways to be able to procure girls. IS: Can you give me any idea as to the total number of underage girls that you know engaged in sexual conduct with Jeffrey during the period of time you had your relationship with him? V: I would have no way of estimating that whatsoever. I mean, there could be a hundred, there could be more, honestly I'm not too sure how many girls, really. I wish I did know. I mean like I said there were so many over the course of 4 years with Jeffrey. + +Let me see if we can try to narrow it down a little bit. Is there any doubt in your mind that it was more than 10? JS: + +V: Yes, there was definitely more than 10. + +JS: Ok, what I want you to do is to give me the highest number that you are comfortable in saying there were definitely more than X number of underage girls that I kn Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sex with while I had a relationship with him. How woul fill in that blank? Definitely more than how many? + +V: I'd say definitely more than a hundred. + +IS: Alright. Did Jeffrey ever help to pick out your clothes? + +V: II yes. I mean he wasn't out to dress me like a porn nything. He would always dress me very classy, but we'd just go shopping all th ther. + +JS: Did he ever express any style preferences ;I Besides dressing classy, I'm, you know, wanted you dressed? how he wanted you to dress? 'suggestion to you about how he + +V: He didn't, like I said, wasn't tryi that. It was nice, classy outfits I like that. He was buying me I was wearing miniskirts, tIbti my cleavage and everythi me in any prostitute way or anything like ng like Gucci, Dolce Gabbana, Chanel, things very nice clothing. It was provocative. I mean ort shorts and little shirts that showed my belly and ey were very expensive clothes. + +JS: Was there every any dc s44 role playing? + +V: Yes. There was) had bon ge ou schoolg; t of it. Jeffrey loved the latex outfits Ghislane had for us girls, he s, he had all different kinds of outfits, but his favorite was the + +JS: Tel out that + +V: you know, Ghislaine would take me to dress me up to surprise J.E or Jeffrey would it me to ge d up, that would include wearing a tiny little skirt with nothing underneath, a illic collared shirt that you would be wearing to school with a tie in it, tied up \_in a bow, my hair in pigtails, stockings on up to my knees, and I would go in there and act like a kid and we'd do role playing sexing. + +JS: Did Jeffrey ever brag to you about the age of any of the girls with whom he had relationships? + +V: Yes, he did. He did all the time. The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift from one of his friends and they were from France. I did see them, I did meet them. Jeffrey bragged afterwards after he met them that they were 12 year olds and flown over from France because they're really poor over there, and their parents needed the money or whatever the case is and they were absolutely free to stay and flew out. Those were the worst ones. He was constantly bragging about girls' ages or where he got em from or their past and how terrible their past was and good he is making it for them + +JS: Where were the 12 year old girls flown to from France? Where did they e to? + +V: Palm Beach. + +JS: And were they flown in on Jeff's private plane or did they get t Cspirted? + +V: No. They were transported by somebody else. + +JS: Ok. Was the sexual activity that went on on t any of the crew was aware of what was goin conducted in such a way so that + +V: They were told to knock if they had to told, you know, to come out as all watching everything, no, but it down' well there's a whole bunch o constantly being massag reason? I mean, only the. o ;'if the crew had to come out. They were possible, so they weren't out there hanging out e an idiot to put two and two together to say sed teenagers on board with this old man who is and he wants me to keep the door shut for what that together, but yeah, they knew. + +JS: Did Mr. Epstein ever ou about people of power and influence owing him favors? + +V: He would laugh it, you know, I never really knew what to take serious from Jeffrey because h ass a funny character at times. You never knew if what he was saying was vu 'ot. cah, lots of people owed him favors from what he told me. Hc's got everyo t his pocket, and he would laugh about he helps people for the sole purpose they owe him something. That's why I believe he does so many favors in the + +JS: "When and how did you first become aware that Mr. Epstein was in trouble with the law? + +V: I was first informed by, I think someone from the FBI called me first and started to ask me questions, and I started to answer the questions but then fear took over, and I just said look, I don't know what's going on, I've got a young family that I don't want to risk, you know, please don't bother me about this again, and it was real short simple conversation, and within a week or 2, I had gotten a call from Jeffrey's attorney, and then a week later, Jeffrey himself. + +adv. Epstein Telep one interview with Page 18 of 23 + +JS: Ok, well let's back up before we get to those conversations and tell me approximately when it was that you were contacted by the person who you believe was with the FBI. + +V: Ok. It's hard for me to pinpoint, if I had to pinpoint it, it would be in 2007 sometime. + +JS: Alright. And you were living in Australia at that time, correct? + +V: Correct. + +JS: You were contacted by telephone? + +V: That's correct, by my cell phone. O le + +IS: Ok and do you have any idea how your name came up leading caat /contact. + +V: No idea. No idea whatsoever. When I did ask, I at some girls had revealed my name, I guess, and that's how everybody, the ft to contact me. + +JS: OK. + +V: But I don't know offhand or sorry, I ju;lllwwl cj into the wrong room. + +JS: Ok. + +V: Sorry go on. + +JS: Yes & I'll never tell id that. how long was it after that phone call from the FBI person u contacted by Mr. Epstein's lawyers. + +V: Like a week. It ck to back to each other. I remember being so scared after talking to the FBI thinIcin\*,what's happening, what's going on. It's been like 6 years, 7 years at that sta how did they find me & what do I have to do with this? So yeah, I do reme ber rvery well, and it was only about a week later I was called by his attorney. + +JS: it that contacted you, do you remember? + +V: Kant to say Bill Riley, but he might have been from the FBI. No, it was Bill Riley. Bill Riley. Not sure if that's his correct name, but that's what is coming to mind + +JS: What do you remember about that conversation? + +V: I remember a Mr. Goldberger as well, I remember, there might have been two of them. + +JS: Alright. + +V: I can't remember which one it was. I want to say Bill Riley is the good one. + +JS: Alright, so either Bill Riley or a Mr. Goldberger or both of them contacted you, and what do you remember about that? + +V: I don't know if it was the same guy who contacted me that week later who put me in touch with Jeffrey. I think he was on the phone and he put speakerphone on with Jeffrey. So he connected me with Jeffrey. I don't know if it was the same guy or different, but I definitely know that Bill Riley was the first guy to contact me. I'm pretty sure about that. + +JS: Ok. Tell me about that conversation. + +V: He asked me what I knew about what's going on with Jeffrey and apparently, there was an investigation being held about some of the girls who had come out and said that Jeffrey had sexual contact with them under the age of a minor and that he was discrediting lot of these girls and making them out to be drug addicts and prostitutes and what have you so they wouldn't be looked upon as worthy in the court's eyes so to speak. And you know, he told me in the first five minutes that, you know, if I stay quiet, that "I'll be looked after". And that was the exact way it was said. It wasn't like you know, I'm gonna pay you a zillion dollars or anything if you be quiet, but if I stay quiet, I would "looked after". And I remember saying I don't want any part to do with this. You know, this is not something I want to be a part of, I've got a young family. I wish the best for everybody in this, you know, take care kind of thing. A week later, I was called after the hearing by one of Jeffrey's lawyers. I can't tell you exactly which one it was but he had Jeffrey on the other line and he connected Jeffrey and I, and Jeffrey tried to make some simple conversation, "How are you? How have things been?" You know what I mean, catching up. + +JS: Do you know if the lawyer, did the lawyer stay on the line while Jeffrey was speaking to you? + +V: I'm pretty sure he did. That's why I think Jeffrey was on speaker phone because it sounded a lot different, and I was never taken off the line to begin with or connected to another line, so I was pretty sure Jeffrey was on speaker phone and the lawyer was making the call. After the simple conversation, it led to what was going on again and you know, Jeffrey couldn't believe it. You know, he thought he helped all these girls out. He didn't think he was wrong in any circumstance here at all. A lot of these girls were drug addicts and just after drug money. You know, he was really putting down these women or these girls I should say, not giving them the credit they deserved, and then he exactly repeated what the lawyer said the week before is that he would look after me if I stayed quiet, and if I need any help, you know, his lawyers would represent me and he would get legal help for me, whatever I need, he would do, and I told him exactly, I said, "Jeffrey, I'm the mother of two children at that stage. I'm away from everything there, I don't want to be a part of it. I'm not going to speak to anybody and I don't want to speak to anybody, I don't want to be involved." That was the last time I heard from him. And the + +next thing I knew, I was sent my victim's letter, my notification of being a victim through the US Attorney's Office and that's when I knew it was well out there enough not to have Jeffrey's lawyers come back on me and discredit me in the same way he had done to all the other girls. So, I called up Joseph Bird who was the recommended lawyers on my paperwork that they had given me and started going from there. + +JS: So you contact Mr. Joseph Bergs' office and then you were dealing with his office from that point forward. + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Tell me about the ending of your relationship with Jeffrey. That's, at what point in time did your full time employment end and how did that happen? + +V: Ok. So, it hadn't really ended. I walked away from it all. Jeffrey sent me to Thailand where I met my husband and escaped to Australia, never to return back to the states. About 6 months prior to that, he came up with a proposition that I thought was really disgustingly sick. And it really showed me for the first time in 4 years I had been with him that nothing was going to change and I was always just going to be used by him(?) which I did not like. He offered me a mansion and some of his money every month, I forget what he called it, a monthly income of what he made to bear one of his children. The proposition was that if anything ever happened between Jeffrey and I, that I would have to sign my child over to him basically and that the child would be his and Ghislaine's, and I would be looking after it as long as nothing happened between Jeffrey and I. So, I was kind of freaked out by all of that. I pushed Jeffrey more to please get me some more training, you know, and I was getting older and not of as much interest to Jeffrey anyways. I was 19 now, and he likes a female a lot younger. So he sent me to Thailand, in September 2002. I was first supposed to meet a girl there and bring her back with me, but I never met up with her. I proceeded get a short course in Thai massage so that was to shut me up about my training so I went there, and one of my friends from school invited me to watch a fight, like a muay thai fight, which is like a form kickboxing. So I went and watched it, and I saw this guy that was a really good fighter, and a girl's word, looked really hot, so I asked my friend who knew him to introduce me. We got introduced and fell in love immediately, 3 days later Rob proposed and 7 days later I was being married in a buddist temple. I called Jeffrey and told him I'm sorry, I'm never coming back. I've gotten married, I've fallen in love. I thought he'd wish the best for me but he was kind of rude and he just said "have a good life" and hung up the phone, and that was the last time I'd talked to him ever until all this started again. + +JS: Ok. [REDACTED] is there anything else that you would like to add to what you have told us up to this point in time? + +V: I'd like to know that this time around something's going to be done about it and that Jeffrey and a lot of his colleagues, no matter how rich they are, will know that there is + +law and that there is people that still believe in it. So that's it. Thank you guys for listening to me, hearing me out and helping me. It's kind of hard to get through. + +JS: Thank you very much. Yes, I'm sure it has been very difficult and I am very appreciative of the courage you have shown in doing what you have done, which really brings me to the last subject, and that is what was it that motivated you to go public with all of this? + +V: Sharon Richard contacted me. I like her, I do, I like her a lot. I know she's a journalist, and journalists are normally bloodsucking leeches, but I like her for that, but she is an honest bloodsucking leech. She told me a lot about what was still going on, and she showed me a picture of Jeffrey with a little girl who looks like she could have been 12 years old. I mean it was disgusting. I agreed to talk with her, I never agreed to do anything until she showed me some pictures, and at that stage, being a mother of 3 children and having a daughter who I would do anything for to protect, I would put my neck on the line to make sure she never has to go through what I had to go through, and knowing all of this, and knowing that he's still out there doing the same exact thing with no regrets, no remorse, no worry about what he's doing to, those girls, and all those girls feeling the same way that I did, so I, you know, I'm doing it because I believe in my heart of hearts it's the right thing to do. It's what I would want somebody to do for my daughter or my sister or my friend, and it saddens me to know that it's still going on right now. It's like the seashell story. I don't know if you're heard the story about the little kid who throws back a starfish, you know, the little brother tries to ask his sister, "why do you throw them in, they're all gonna die anyways, the little girl says "well, it's this one that I can help, and this one that I can help," and that's what I feel like I'm doing. I'm making a small dent in this big world we live in. + +JS: I certainly appreciate that courage, and I have heard that story, and you're absolutely right, that one person may not be able to make a difference for everyone, but one person can make a difference for someone, and hopefully, you are making a difference for someone, and we're gonna do the best we can to make sure you are making a difference for as many people as possible. + +V: Thanks Jack. + +JS: Just a few other follow up things I want to ask you and again, if any of these questions are questions that you're uncomfortable in responding to, then don't hesitate to tell me that. Do you have any recollection of Jeffrey Epstein's specifically telling you that "Bill Clinton owes me favors"? + +V: Yes. I do. It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what's Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor. He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn't know if he was serious. It was just a joke. + +V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They're all in each other's pockets. + +JS: When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here? + +V: On the island. + +JS: When you were present with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on the isl there? ho olse was + +ll V: Ghislaineand there was 2 young girls that I could id er really knew them well anyways. It was just 2 girls from New York. + +JS: And were all of you staying at Jeffrey's house on the is1aluding Bill Clinton? + +V: That's correct. He had about 4 or 5 different vill snstand separate from the main house, and we all stayed in the villas. + +JS: Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence o\*Redaction has been made at the request of the witness. + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +### CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendarit, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SECONlik `fir ST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT/CO1UNTER-PL J. + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey ("Epstein") hereby requests that S' 1 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley 3. Echi#1-s produce for inspection and copying those items requested in Epstein's Second Re4ueit roc Production within 30 days of service at the offices of Burnett P.A OM Point West, 777 South Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I /ifargrit CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by e-mail and U.S. Mail on this 9th day of December, 2011 on: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +r NfrAiwn+Af J eph Ackerman, Jr. + +Florida Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. /r...4 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401tt" 7' Telephone: (561) 802-904 Facsimile: (561) 802799 6%;..)-• Attorneys for Plaintig-Jerney Epstein + +### DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +1. The term "M," "you" or "your" means the party or parties to whom this Request for Production is addressed, i.e., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff including, all persons acting or purporting to act on his behalf. j. + +2. "Second Amended Counterclaim" means the Second unterclaim which you served on November 29, 2011 on the Plaintiff/Counter-Delendrutt Jeffrey Epstein in this action. • • + +3. The term "witness" means any natural-tors\*/ individual, proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, 41iate, subsidiary, association, • organization, joint venture, firm, other busine AtteSte, governmental body, group of natural persons or other entity. + +( 1 %, \*.• 4. The terms "identify( "desbribe" or "provide" when used with reference to a ," natural person means: • + +A. the Anl name, current telephone number(s) and current business and home addresses (or, if tle•current telephone number and/or current business and home addresses are not known, ,the-laseknown telephone numbers and/or business and home addresses) of the person. 'Addresses shall include the street and post office box if known and the city, state, country and zip code; + +B. the full name and address of each employer, each corporation of which the person is an officer or director, and each limited liability company of which the person is a manager or a member, each partnership of which the person is a partner, and each other business in which the person is a principal; + +C. the person's current (o r, if the current is not known, the last 'known) • position, and the position or positions held by the person at the time of the actin which the response to a specific request relates; and + +D. such other information as is sufficient to provide full identification of the person; + +5. The terms "identify," "describe" or "prov eti used with reference to any entity other than a natural person means: + +. \ A. the full name of the entityXe'type of entity (e.g., corporation, limited liability company, partnership, etc.), thead1dres&f its principal place of business, its principal business activity, the jurisdiction under the aws of which it has been organized and the date of s such organization; + +B. each of the entity's officers, directors, shareholders, managers, members, partners or other pects' + +• -51. "any other available information concerning the existence or identity of the entity. + +6: - The terms "identify," "describe" or "provide" when used with reference to a document means: + +A. the name or designation of the document; + +B. the name of the person(s) who participated in the creation of the document + +C. the date of the document; + +D. the person or entity to whom the document is addressed (ieltity) and those a". to whom any copies of the document were addressed or delivered; + +E. a brief description of the contents of the document; and. + +F. all signatories to the document. + +7. "Doctunent" means any letter, correspondence, memorandum, report, calendar; diary, appoint/nen!' record (including business, financial and medical records), ledger, audi t ice, statement, schedule, recording of . sound or photographs, electronic file cwth: n disk, tape, drive or otherwise), printout, writing, drawing, sketch, notes (hitadviikten - or otherwise), map, blueprint, e-mail, data compilation; and written or recorded material of any kind and character. + +8. "Referring.to," "reflecting," "evidencing" or "relating to" means in any way directly or indirectly, concerning, referring to, disclosing, describing, confirming, supporting, evidencing or seating. + +and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to bring within the scope of each request which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. + +10. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm, limited liability company, corporation, organization, trust, governmental or public entity, and any of the officers, directors, shareholders, members, managers, partners, agents, employees, assigns or representatives of the same. + +I I. "Substantiate," "state" or "explain" means to produce documents or things that set forth the circumstances or bases for any belief, contention or position or giyettformation or direction in response to a request. ev A • + +-•t 12. If documents or things that are responsive to all or pari,of a specific request are not within your custody, possession or control, for each, state w,lien it was last in your custody, possession or control, and why it is no longer in your custodyr,pa ssion, or control and identify the person(s) that you know has or last had lieve has or last had custody, possession or control of such document or thi T s , • . + +13. If you do not presently havetz.y.sr custody, possession or control, documents or things that are responsive to a reque0, inc e a statement to that effect, and at such time as any • "., responsive document or thing comes tnto your custody, possession or control, produce same within ten days of its location, and in any event, produce it no less than ten days prior to trial. + +14. Ex where otherwise stated, the time period for the requests made herein is January 1, 2Qq the present. + +## REQUESTS + +1. Each and every document that tends to support the claim in your Second Amended Counterclaim that you have suffered damage to your reputation as a result of tote filing of this action against you. + +2. Each and every document that tends to support the claiN your Second 4. Amended Counterclaim that you have suffered damage as a result of iaterference in your professional relationships. + +3. Each and every document that tends special damages, including loss of income; this r limited to, production of your federal income of income in 2011. to support anV claim you are making for l ecifically shall include, but not be or 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and records + +4. Each and every doa&ten'l4hat tends to support the claim in your Second Amended Counterclaim that y4 hav luffered money damages resulting from the loss of the - - value of your time diverted from your professional responsibilities; this request specifically shall include, but not beetznited to, the production of all your time and billing records, calendars and diaries from 2Q0 ugh the date on which you respond to this request. + +h and every document, including, but not limited to, invoices and statements, that tendi to support the claim in your Second Amended Counterclaim that you have paid money or incurred obligations to pay money for your defense in this lawsuit. + +6. Each and every document evidencing communications from others with respect to your reputation and standing in the legal community. + +- 7. Witness statements you intend to use in this case. +- 8. All invoices and statements for legal services and costs incurred for the defense of this action against you. +- 9. Each agreement or other writing memorializing the arrangemeneapursuant to which you are receiving legal services for the defense of this action, including4 riot limited to a retainer agreement with Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, ZA. , +- 10. Each and every document that tends to sholvethate your reputation has been damaged as a result of your relationship with Rothstein, Rosferifelcii& Adler. + - • + - • +- 11. Each and every document reflecting gross collections received from your providing services as a lawyer for each of the y 007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. +- 12. Invoices, statements of ac bother documents reflecting treatment for any physical or psychological injury yeti clack to have suffered as a result of this action being +- ••%, brought against you. +- 13. Each and every document reflecting the method used in calculating your loss of income, whether l awages or other remuneration, for the period you claim to have suffered damages. mit loss of future earning capacity as a direct result of the allegedly wrongful conduct. h and every document reflecting the method used in calculating your alleged +- 15. Each and every document reflecting all lost business opportunities you claim to have suffered between 2009 and the present. + +16. Each and every document reflecting the identity of the confidential source(s) listed on your Privilege Log dated February 23, 2011. + +17. Each and every document reflecting the legal authority that justifies your refusal to disclose the identity of the person(s) identified as a confidential source in youe'Pervilege Log dated February 23, 2011. + +18. All closing statements for all clients who you represented that brought claims • against the Plaintiff (and all other documents with respect tospcb clients), reflecting amounts paid to such clients or to you, your time, referring attooks apt amounts paid to the same, . advance costs, and payments to any other person or + +19. All records of your contacts wi or other media outlets. + +20. Any agreements and c4) .•. , • `-c. 1 agreements for the sale of, developthent of,',)or any other transaction relating to, movie, book or other rights that you may or will benefit rom which are related to the claims you or your clients brought against the Plaintiff. ons relating to agreements or potential + +21. All elocumentS supporting your alleged belief that law enforcement is still • investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, including those reflecting cornmuratiffints with or information received from the government/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief. + +22. All documents supporting your claim that "others still persist in prosecuting claims against Jeffrey Epstein." + +23. All documents supporting your claims in Paragraphs 9 and 25 of the Second Amended Counterclaim in which you allege the sole purpose of filing civil claims was never to recover monetary damages, that PlaintiffCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein knew he never suffered monetary damages, and that he knowingly asserted baseless and uns le claims, etc. + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +12 JAN 9 PM 4:19 +SHARON R. BOGER, GLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL A + +PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] by and through his undersigned attorney and pursuant to Rule 1.350, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby respond to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Request to Produce dated December 9, 2011 as follows: + +1. 1. Objection. The identification of documents "that tend to support" a specific claim would require a disclosure of the mental impressions and thought processes of counsel and is accordingly protected by the work-product privilege. +2. 2. Objection. The identification of documents "that tend to support" a specific claim would require a disclosure of the mental impressions and thought processes of counsel and is accordingly protected by the work-product privilege. +3. 3. Objection. The identification of documents "that tend to support" a specific claim would require a disclosure of the mental impressions and thought processes of counsel and is accordingly protected by the work-product privilege. + +4. Objection. The identification of documents "that tend to support" a specific claim would require a disclosure of the mental impressions and thought processes of counsel and is accordingly protected by the work-product privilege. + +5. Objection. The identification of documents "that tend to suppo ifc claim would require a disclosure of the mental impressions and thought procesgets unsel and is accordingly protected by the work-product privilege. + +Invoices reflecting expenses incurred in defense of this: lawsuit are available for inspection and copying at the offices of at any mutually convenient time determined by prior arrangement. + +X + +6. The only responsive documen naNir + +- the original and amendej Dimple nts in this action +- Epstein's Motion to ,Depdse Rothstein (with attachments and certificate of service) filed at the RItA - bankruptcy proceedings +- bankruptcy filings and hearing transcripts all of which are already in the ion of Epstein and his counsel + +nvoices reflecting expenses incurred in defense of this lawsuit are available for inspection and copying at the offices of tine determined by prior arrangement. IMcounsel at any mutually convenient + +- adrilissible evidence; privileged pursuant to law +- 9. Responsive documents are available for inspection and copying at the offices of IIMcounsel at any mutually convenient time determined by prior arrangement. +- 10. None +- 11. Objection. Overly broad, not reasonably calculated to lead taiitare.discovery of ' - M right and; i'rig of his clients, . 0 . partners, and associates to economic privacy, and in so Crcurristances subject to contractual confidentiality provisions. + - 12. None +- 13. Records reflecting the amount of has been obliged to devote to the defense of Epstein's ma busive, and baseless legal actions against are available for intatti d copying at the offices of counsel at any mutually convenkacliple determined by prior arrangement. + - 14. None +- 15. Records .rettecting the amount of time which has been obliged to devote to th &tense' of Epstein's malicious, abusive, and baseless legal actions against available for inspection and copying at the offices of utually convenient time determined by prior arrangement. + - 16. Objection. Attorney work product privilege + - 17. Objection. Attorney work product privilege + +MO adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +18. Objection. Overly broad, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, privileged pursuant to right and the rights of his clients, law partners, and associates to economic privacy, and in some circumstanc subject to contractual confidentiality provisions. + +19. Objection. Attorney work product privilege except to A`C is identified as a source of information in published k en available to Jeffrey Epstein as to through inti4 \*Arches. that ich are as easily + +20. None + +the 22. None except to the extent that rtdltj Victims Rights Act proceedings fall within description of this request. Plead' hf matter are public records readily available to Jeffrey Epstein. + +21. None + +23. See Edwa sir Motion for Summary Judgment and attachments thereto and all pleadings and filings in the state and federal criminal proceedings against Epstein and in each of the civikaaims brought against and settled by him—all of which are already in the possessiortottpstein and/or the members of the various law firms who do and have represented hitt'. • + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of January, 2012. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J: [REDACTED] + +Edwards adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, L 33 -6170 Phone: (561) 8 4 Fax: (561) 8 + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### Tina L. Campbell + +From: Tina L + +Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 7:17 AM + +To: Chris R. Rod ers + +Subject: E stein v. + +Attachments: 2011-4-7 Telephone Interview.pdf + +Hi Chris, + +Could you please send me the audio for this telephone interview? + +Thank you. + +![](_page_50_Picture_14.jpeg) + +Tina... CP/FRP CO + +Cerlili ara ega + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes BI 01 + +West Palm Beach, FL 3340 + +office (561) 727-36001 fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: tinagNinkrocklaw.com + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential Information. If it is not meant for you, please delete It and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may b sed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT QF THE: FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT; IN AND FOR PALM BEACH • COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASENO:: 502009CA04080.0XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. ineividually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +CO SA + +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S BRADLEY J. SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST + +cows NOW the Counter- RADLEY J.:EDWARDS and hereby files his. Amended Exhibit List as follows: + +- 0. No objection +- 1. All objections •2. All objecp e t authenticity +- 3. Irrelev aterial +- 4. So value substantially outweighed by \*get' of unfair prejudice; confusi0n.of issues, misleading the jury, or 'needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +### BJE ONS + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXX X BA , + +Counter-Plaintiff's, List J. Second Amended Exhibit + +Counter-Plaintiff + +No. + +Marked Marked for Objection in Evidence Identification + +Description of Exhibit + +| 1. 2. | All applicable criminal statutes. All applicable Florida Statutes. | | | +|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|---| +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles. | 4 | 1 | +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books SM 101: A Realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy: | | | +| | A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their rs | | | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement. :\ Jane Doe 102 Complaint. t' | | | +| | Messages taken from mes e pa found at Epstein's home. | | | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. | | | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein's phone records. | | | +| 11. phone records. 1 | | | | +| 1 -\ | tafl Visitation Logs. Jeffrey Epstein's probation file. | | | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | | | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | | | +| 16. | Video of Epstein Property Inspection, 01/18/10. | | | + +| 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. | home. Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints. All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's ACIA assets. Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). CO .' Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epst • c Yearbooks of Jane Doe. 2002 Palm Beach High Sc ht '\ook. 2001 Palm Beach Hi Near Book. 2003 Palm Beach G chool Year Book. Affidavit and A or Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epste 's h e (from Palm Beach State Attorney's , hibit #29). Note s found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or d trash pulls outside of his home during - . in vestigation. | +|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 29. | 1 aim Beach State Attorney's Criminal file ainst Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction. | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy. | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name. | + +| 33. | All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him. | | | | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant. | | | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092. | | | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB. | | | | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG. | | | | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 41. | Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | | | | + +| 42. | Video footage (DVD) of walk through site | +|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits DreDared against | +| | Jeffrey Epstein and Alik' | +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey | +| | Epstein's donations to law enforcement. CP S | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Nils, | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report 1 | +| | ik lir | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft | +| 52. | singer lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements. | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns. | +| ________ 56. | ,4:fi2:= volving co | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaint" Ms, I M, Second Amended Exhibit List + +| | uat, Jean Luc Brunel and | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08. | +| 59. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated | +| | 07/25/06 (unredacted) 40441.8\' | +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein. N" | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Corn | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registratibisr m | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking pho p | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL B ZY, | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey E teinphiuse contacts. | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments. | +| 68. | Letter from | +| 70- | '1.etter | +| | from to | +| 71. | Letter from to | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, and L.M.. Case No.: 5020091.100XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaineff's, J Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 72. | Letter fro | to | +|-----|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------| +| 73. | Letter fro | to | +| 74. | Letter fro | to | +| | Assistant Assist | e orney, | +| | | 404 A' | +| | | Letter from Goldberger, 06/22/06. %Id | +| 76. | | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. c | +| 77. | aL | ments related to the rental of a ye | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents. | | +| 79. | Documents related to pro | es of | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein's propertiQ , | +| 80. | | Arrest Warrant of Sarah Kellen. | +| 81. | Police report regarding | picking | +| 82. | Lis | Trilateral Commission Members of 2003. | +| 83. | Ala | ershowitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute | +| 84 | | tter dated 04/17/06. | +| 85. | | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information. | +| 86. | | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet. | +| 87. | | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest. | + +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest. | +|------|------------------------------------------------| +| 89. | Flight information for | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005. | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: Maria. | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case. | +| | 404 A | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5t^ Amendment Speech. IC:) 4 | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher, 05/01/06. C .( | +| 95. | Police Report, 11/28/04. | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts. | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter t 09/03/08 | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi e t J y Epstein's | +| 99. | Victim's Medical R Dr. Randee Speciale. | +| 100. | All surveillance ondu t d by law | +| | enforcement on Epstein's home. | +| 101. | Emails re c rom Palm Beach Records | +| | rel to Je y Epstein. | +| 102. | et em listed on the Palm Beach Police Property | +| | rt, Lists and/or Property Receipts. | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records. | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police | + +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped | +|------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records | +| | party to this cause. AeAsk | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not | +| 109. | reserves all objections to Epstein' | +| 110. | reserves the right to supplem | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, Edward no ving | +| | his right to object to same at a oes not | +| | waive their right to ame e. | +| 112. | All exhibits listed subject to | +| 113. | All pleadi and a chments in the action | +| | under the ictims Rights Act prosecuted | +| | by B ley wards on behalf of victims of | +| | E 's criminal molestations. | +| | Ed s' Motions for Summary Judgment, all | +| 115. | All time records and hourly billing | +| 116. | All deposition testimony and discovery responses | + +| 117. | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the | +|------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 118. | All submissions by Epstein in connection with | +| 119. | All Settlement Agreements between Epstein | +| | and victims of his sexual molestations. Arnik' | +| 120. | Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced | +| 121. | Photo depicting Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 122. | All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein o | +| 123. | AcN, | +| 124. | Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police | +| 125. | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and | +| 126. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +| | e‘y Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +| 128. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +| | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Fourth | + +| 129. | Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. | +|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 130. | Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records | +| 131. | Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender | +| 132. | New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: l' | +| Mat | New York Presbyterian Ho | +| 134. | Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (sign | +| 135. | Proposed Joint Letter to the S ml r. | +| 136. | Front and Back of Hard Col Phot' | +| 137. Color photo o | ferry "New York". | +| 138. Scenic photo of i | Square. | +| 139. | hoto on back of ship. | +| 140. | room in New York. | +| r | , | +| 141. | photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch). | +| 142. Color photo of | at Zorro Ranch | +| 143. | photo on horse front of ranch. | +| 144. | photo standing against rocks (red | + +| 145. | standing against rocks (red coat) (far) | +|------|---------------------------------------------------| +| | (with back photo = back date). | +| 146. | photo riding horse blue jacket far. | +| 147. | photo on side of horse hand up. | +| 148. | photo on side of horse. S ic | +| 149. | photo outside next to tables. | +| 150. | photo red coat leaning on rail. | +| 151. | photo standing outside next to fireplace. | +| 152. | photo standing in front of ranch. | +| 153. | photo with hand over head | +| 154. | photo standing next to piano. | +| 155. | photo in front of fireplace (museum). | +| 156. | photo in front of wagon in museum. | +| 157. | Color photo of in front of museum | +| 158. | Photograph in Spain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine | +| 159. | ANS (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2. | +| 160. | Cover photo book 2. | +| 161. | Scenic photo (with back photo. | +| 162. | Scenic photo (with back photo IM). | +| 163. | Scenic photo (with back photo P. | + +| 164. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +|------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 165. | steps with trees overhead. | +| 166. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | +| 167. | Scenic photo (with back photo M). | +| 168. | Scenic photo (with back photo In. | +| 169. | Scenic photo (with back photo M. | +| 170. | Scenic photo (with back photo and black). | +| 171. | Scenic photo (with back photo and blac .• | +| 172. | Scenic photo (with back photo an | +| 173. | on steps with child ack photo | +| 174. | on street ' I (far) (with back | +| | photo and black). | +| 175. | Travel envelope. | +| 176. | Si • ; is. t a • i el Cover with handwritten notes | +| 177. | Thand Hotel Receipts. | +| | o Docket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein. | +| Ac | t rivestigation | +| 180. | Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16 | +| 181. | FBI Form 302 - Interview of in | +| 182. | Mark Epstein Deposition. | + +| 183. | March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File). | | | | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 184. | Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | +| 185. | Airport Codes ( Demonstrative ). | | | | +| 186. | March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up! | | | | +| 187. | DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1. | | | | +| 188. | [REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe [REDACTED] and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05. | | | | +| 189. | Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account. | | | | +| 190. | Folder title [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by [REDACTED] Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files). | | | | +| 191. | Folder title [REDACTED] Cell [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005. | | | | +| 192. | Folder title [REDACTED]: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement. | | | | +| 193. | Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez. | | | | +| 194. | Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997). | | | | +| 195. | Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. | | | | + +| 196. | Palm Beach House/Information Sheet. | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| 197. | Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach | +| 198. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09. | +| 199. | Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol 11) 09/08/09. d ic | +| 200. | Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. | +| | 0 201. Passport application; issued January 12, 2001. ) 1 | +| 202. | Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez. | +| 203. | Criminal Complaint —Alfredo Rodriguez. ,S ) | +| 204. | Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodriguez. ", | +| 205. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's properties and planes. | +| 206. | Photos of Jeffrey Epstein employees and former | +| 207. | Jeffrey Epstein Guilty Plea documents. | +| 208. | Palm Beach County State Attorney's Response to Public | +| | Records Request (including audio recordings). | +| 209. | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with | +| | opk ..r | +| 210. | AC | +| 211. | Any and all documents produced in this action. | +| 212. | Any and all depositions taken in this action. | +| 213. | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used | + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. + Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Second Amended Exhibit List + +| 214. | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition. | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 215. | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action. | | | | +| 216. | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal. | | | | +| 217. | Any and all pleadings filed in this action. | | | | +| 218. | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action. | | | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017. + +![]()Jack Scarola + Florida Bar No.: 169440 + Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and + mep@searcylaw.com + Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + Phone: (561) 686-6300 + Fax: (561) 383-9451 + Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED]. Second Amended Exhibit List + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com; +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009 hc.gargiaaaMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J Second Amended Exhibit List + +J. , Esquire alle®pathtojusti Jaffe WeissingilinFistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Alk " + +,1O + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 C O efiling®tonjahaddad.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +iS 5) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein c + +?S' \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19d80836ec22caed7e2f86914e4b53f10a564013 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/EFTA02764629.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3007 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 70, + "chars": 111941, + "elapsed_seconds": 25.12, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_50_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO COMPEL AYTQI CORDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 356.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.476, + 450.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 358.0408935546875, + 450.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 358.0408935546875, + 464.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 289.476, + 464.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's 2011 Discovery Request for Production of Audio Recording", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 585.6788940429688 + ], + [ + 483.49456787109375, + 585.6788940429688 + ], + [ + 483.49456787109375, + 599.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 599.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "This Court's Recent November/Dec \nPrompted a Second Request for ' e e\nRulings \nRecording", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.1043395996094, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.1043395996094, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Evidence Code Requires Production by of the Best Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 508.71881103515625, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 508.71881103515625, + 169.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 169.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 498.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 155.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.952, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 493.07476806640625, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 493.07476806640625, + 112.863037109375 + ], + [ + 119.952, + 112.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 466.4004211425781, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 466.4004211425781, + 106.863037109375 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 106.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL DIVISION AG \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB \nJudge David F.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 411.1717529296875, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 411.1717529296875, + 162.363037109375 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 162.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SECONlik `fir ST FOR PRODUCTION TO \nDEFENDANT/CO1UNTER-PL J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 527.4932861328125, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 527.4932861328125, + 386.6030578613281 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 386.6030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 386.69989013671875, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 386.69989013671875, + 550.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 550.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.512, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 411.3055114746094, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 411.3055114746094, + 142.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 199.512, + 142.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 340.8046569824219, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 340.8046569824219, + 141.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 141.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.896, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 336.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 357.4582824707031, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 357.4582824707031, + 144.363037109375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tina L. Campbell", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 32.436, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 131.1623992919922, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 131.1623992919922, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 32.436, + 74.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT QF THE: \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT; \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \n\u2022 COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.8299865722656, + 70.86376953125 + ], + [ + 499.7363586425781, + 70.86376953125 + ], + [ + 499.7363586425781, + 129.363037109375 + ], + [ + 315.8299865722656, + 129.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BJE ONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 376.28692626953125, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 376.28692626953125, + 460.10302734375 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 460.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 135.27 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764629" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/_page_50_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/_page_50_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfcef71695d873a65b62d3c0eb767c951020c430 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764629/_page_50_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d63907461842191d934a6c3ab6183bd4184bb81bc17c16e008b2089cdcb39ce3 +size 10656 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..753208ffe7cbe2ce235cdf8a3160285293e57337 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.md @@ -0,0 +1,662 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X3DOMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +7Th + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE ON NEWLY DISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS /1ND TO\_EXCLUDE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO WERE NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine on Newly Disclosed Trial Exhibits and to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Who Were Not Deposed in this Matter, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +- 1. Epstein's Motion is misleading and is nothing more than a pointless attempt to make a mountain out of axle M. Pursuant to the Court's July 20, 2017 Pre-Trial Order, timely produced copies of all 79 trial exhibits that Epstein's motion seeks to categorically exclude. These exhibits were produced along with 130+ additional exhibits in November of 2017. +- 2. Immediately after the December 7, 2017 hearing in this case, undersigned counsel's office realized that, through oversight, its November 3, 2017 Amended Exhibit List was the wrong version of that pleading because it inadvertently left off the descriptions of 79 exhibits that had already been produced to defense counsel. So, although the filed exhibit list needed to be corrected, + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA0401300XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. C SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, O individually, + +vs. + +VOLUA4SS ) + +# TRANSCR \F ROCEEDINGS + +DATE TA ail: uesday, December 5th, 2017 TIME: 10:02 a.m. - 4:35 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida BEF Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +( Sol.is cause came on to be heard at the time and place aid, when and where the following proceedings were ed by: + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 2 3 4 5 6 is the video of the search warrant of my client's home -- while being executed, the search. I don't have the video, but I presume by that -- it wasn't produced, but I presume by that description, it is the same ruling. + +7 8 9 THE COURT: The same ruling as in 1 the application for the search warra n sustained. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C .) MR. SCAROLA: Let me just t out to Alq, is because the victims, i In Your Honor that the reason Cc: Tina L. ; Jack Scarola ; Kimberly Marsh ; M nn ; Kara Berard Rockenbach Subject: Re: Regarding: M, adv. Epstein (File It: 291874 + +Of course. Scott + +SCScott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation zt\_? S \i + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA ""' rir 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: scott linkrocklaw.com + +![](_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg) + +CIVIL TRIAL APPELLATE A LAW This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please + +confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Chris R. Rodgers wrote: + +Hey Tina, + +![](_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg) + +We are having data download speed issues with some of our exhibits. While we hope to get you these exhibits by the end of today, our fear is that the download delay might take longer + +than expected (actually, it already has). Given that, and in an abundance of ciiiiiould you be willing to extend to us a one day extension to provide you with the missing exhibits? + +Thank you for your understanding with this matter, + +Chris Rodgers + +From: Chris R. Rodgers + +Sent: December 7, 2017 8:47 AM + +To: 'Tina L.-' + +Cc: Jack Scarola . David P. Vitale Jr. . Kimberly Marsh + +; Mary McCann . Scott J. Link ,"4,,,,"i i, + +; Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Subject: Regarding: ,M adv. Epstein (File tt: 291874) + +Yesterday it was discovered that we inadvertently attached an incorr C version of our Exhibit List to our Unilateral Pre-Trial Stipulation which was filed on November 15, 2017. While the exhibit list provided in this filing was incorrect, the actual exhibit documents forwarded to you on November 9, 2017 were correct. As an example, the 11/09/17 provided exhibits go to number 207, while the 11/15/17 Exhibit List stops at number 142. You will notice that the correct Exhibit List (attached) corresponds correctly to the provided exhibits. To correct this error, we are filing this correct Exhibit List today — as our Second Amended Exhibit List. Please e-mail or call with any concerns, or questions, regarding this correction. + +Good Morning Tina, + +www.sear law is R. Rodgers + +nior Litigation Parale s al lnvesti • ator + +rrofters@searcylaw coca P: (561) 686-6300 ext. 145 F: (561) 383.94S1 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Fl. 33409 + + + +Privileged and Confidential I Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. if the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. • • \*\* + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S VISED MNIBUS MOTION IN ' INE SECTION B TRIAL EXHIBITS) + +THIS MATTER came before the Cou or hecing on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, upon Section B ( Trial tbit t I) of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Dcfenda pstcin ("Epstein") (D.E. 1070). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the espon tied by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a ') (D.E. 1089), having argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: + +&#x27; Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine was directed at Amended Exhibit List dated November 9, 2017. D.E. 1043.) On December 7, 2017, after two ays of hearing and substantive filed a Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1109) identifying 79 new items Court rulings, andalfing some o his earlier disclosed exhibits. This Order only addresses the exhibits identified on November 9, 2017, Exhibit List. To the extent any exhibit numbers have been replaced with different items or new numbers have been added, those will be subject to aseparate Order after the appropriate motion and hearing. The rulings set forth herein for all exhibits disclosed on December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List that have not been modified will remain unc i e + +![](_page_8_Picture_11.jpeg) + +I. On or before December 20. 2017, . hal I produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial with the exception of Exhibit No. 1 13 which is addressed separately in paragraph 2 below. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219, 226, 228.) + +2. On or before January 5, 2018, shall produce to Epstein the specific court filings to be used as trial exhibits from the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedin ne Does #1 and #2 v. United Slows OPMeriai, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Case No. 08- 80736-Civ-Marraa designated as a Trial Exhibit No shall not produce each and every item identified on the Court's docket, cull out the specific items he intends to use at trial. The Court hereby sustains Ep ction to Exhibit No. 113 as being overbroad. The Court will revisit this ruling w s narrows the documents he intends to introduce at trial. (12/5/17 Tr. 218:25.226: + +3. As set forth in more detai ow, ilk Court has sustained Epstein's objections to a number of trial exhibits. ThOse o jections will be sustained unless there is a showing at trial that the exhibits are relevant and material to the issues to be determined. For example, exhibits may be admissible if they \_relate toEdwards' three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe), if they relate to issues concerning r preparation and evaluation of his clients' cases, or for any other SN1 4/ reason enunciated\ by the Court on the record at the November 29, 2017 and December 5, 2017 hearings: In`:those instances, will be allowed to speak generically about the facts surroun\ding those exhibits, but will not necessarily be allowed to introduce the exhibits at trial without further Order of the Court. The Court will make decisions on an item-by-item basis at the appropriate time. Any discussions relating to an exhibit to which an objection has been sustained shall be conducted outside the presence of the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24; 198:19-199:5.) + +4. As set forth in more detail below, the Court defers rulings on Epstein's objections directed to trial exhibits concerning Epstein's net worth and in support ola punitive damages claim. The Court will address these objections at the appropriate time. (128/17 Tr. 163:17-164:15.) + +5. The Court makes the following specific findings: + +## LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS: + +I — All Objections 2 — All Objections except Authenticity 3 - Relevance 4 — Probative value substantially outweighed b dan confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or n evidence 5 — Privileged 6 - Opinion 7 — Hearsay 8 — Authenticity 9 — Other (please identify basis 10 — Completeness 4 n) II — Overbroad 12 — Not provided to Co Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation 13 —Not a proper e tbi 14 — Trade secrets/C idetltial f unfair prejudice, resentation of cumulative + +| No. | ' Exhibit | teseptIon Epstein's | | +|-----|--------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------| +| I. | All applicable criminal statutes | 3,4, 7, I I, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 2. | All applicablef lorida Statutes r"\ | 3,4, 7, II, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 3. | Photos and information ofJeffrey Epstein's | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | 1 1/29/17 Tr. 160:6-162:15 | +| 4. | OntleroOnfinnation from Amazon.com for | 3,4,7, 8 | 11/29/17 Tr. 162:16-167-9 | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3,4,7, 8, 10 | 11/29/17 Tr. 167:11-13 | + +| No. | [REDACTED]' Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | 11/29/17 Tr. 167:14-170:9
Sustained | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | 11/29/17 Tr. 171:22-176:9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statements. | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | 11/29/17 Tr. 176:10-187:8
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statements. | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 64:8-81:17: 85:11-22
Sustained | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 81:18-82:17: 146:14-149:19: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 11. | [REDACTED] phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 149:20-150:1: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 150:2-3: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 150:4-152:11: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 152:14-153:13
Deferred | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24
Sustained | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed 2 | 3, 4, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 160:25-161:21
Sustained | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read | 12/5/17 Tr. 160:25-162:19
Sustained | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | 12/5/17 Tr. 162:20-24
Deferred | + +2 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] changed the description of this exhibit to: "Video of Epstein Property Inspection 01/18/10." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 162:25-164:15
Deferred | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 163:4-5; 164:16-19
Sustained | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:20-24
Sustained | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:25-165:5
Deferred | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16;
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home 3 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | 12/5/17 Tr. 166:15-24
Sustained | + +3 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29)." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus. the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 167:7-168:16
Sustained in part and overruled in part. The impact upon the issues as to preparedness, knowledge, as far as Mr. [REDACTED] is concerned – his diligence as to discovery – if those are called into question, then this exhibit may be discussed. The actual documents themselves are excessive and would be getting into other matters that would not be germane to [REDACTED] three clients and, therefore, may not be used until discussed outside the presence of the jury | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 168:17-175:1
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If [REDACTED] had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, this file may come into play. The sheer amount of the criminal file would also be relevant to Mr. Epstein's state of mind at the time he filed the underlying Complaint. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury. | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-179:25
Deferred | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-180:5
Deferred | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13,
The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | 12/5/17 Tr. 180:23-181:12
Deferred | + +| No. | Exhibit Description Epstein's | | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------| +| 33. | All ofJeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for | | +| | 3, 4, I I, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 188:23-192:17 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein | | +| | 3, 4, II, 12, 13 | Not addres e at hearing | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative | | +| | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | /1 Tr. 192:18-22 | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was | | +| | 3, 4, I 1 , 12, 13. | Tr. 192:23-193:2 | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and | | +| | 08-8081 I, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591 , | | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimo | | +| | 502008CA02805 1 XXXXIM d | | +| | 502008CP003626XXXXM ) | | +| | 3, 4, I I, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and | | +| | 3, 4, II, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | +| | 3, 4, 7. 8, I I, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 193:3-194:22 | +| 41. | Repo rteil,yitlysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 194:23-195:1 | +| 42. | Videcitootage (DVD) of walk through site | | +| | 3, 4. 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:2-195:15 | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavits re red against | | +| | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195;19-196:2 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:3-19
Sustained | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victims 4 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:20-197:2
Sustained | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:3-23
Sustained | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:24-198:10
Sustained | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:8
Sustained | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:9-25
Sustained | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:4-18
Not Produced
Reserved ruling because documents not available | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:19-22
Sustained | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:23-24
Sustained | +| 59. | Massage Table 5 | 3, 4, 12 (document marked as No. 59 is not a massage table) | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:25-201:21
Sustained | + +4 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(CW & SR) 07/09/2008." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's nil in g holds. + +s In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/25/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community Control and Probation | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various states) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 202:9-203:4
Deferred | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8,
Document says
cannot rely on this
for legal action | 12/5/17 Tr. 203:5-204:2
Deferred | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 204:3-11
Sustained | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(document
provided is not
reflective of
description) | 12/5/17 Tr. 204:12-205:12
Sustained | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 205:13-15
Deferred | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 205:16-22: 206:2-
207:14: 209:15-210:5
Sustained | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein 6 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(document
provided does not
match
description), 14 | 12/15/17 Tr. 205:23-25
Deferred | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-11-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 2-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | + +6 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report date 19/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems 'appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-10-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 209:10-12: 210:6-21
Sustained | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 210:22-211:3
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If Edwards had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, these documents may come into play. The sheer amount of the criminal file would also be relevant to Mr. Epstein's state of mind at the time he filed the underlying Complaint. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury. | +| 77. | Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, document produced contains other items not identified on list | 12/5/17 Tr. 211:4-22
Sustained | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | 3, 4, 7, 8, document produced contains other items not identified on list | 12/5/17 Tr. 211:23-25
Sustained | +| 79. | Documents related to property searches of Jeffrey Epstein's properties | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:1-4
Deferred | +| 80. | Arrest Warrant of Sarah [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:5-7
Sustained | +| 81. | Police report regarding [REDACTED] picking up money dated 11-28-04 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:8-15
Sustained | +| 82. | List of Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:16-213:1
Sustained | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute 90.410 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 213:2-214:8
Not Produced
Deferred | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:9-11
Sustained | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:12-20
Deferred | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:21-24
Sustained | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
Sustained | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
Sustained | +| 89. | Flight information for [REDACTED] | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
Sustained | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
Sustained | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.re Maria | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:6-8
Sustained | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | 3, 4, 12 (document provided is not what is identified on list), 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:9-17
Deferred | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5 th Amendment Speech | 3, 4, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:18-20
Deferred. References to deposition excerpts not ruled upon fully; subject to specific line reference rulings which will be subject to a separate order | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:21-216:14
Not produced
Deferred | +| 95. | [REDACTED] Police Report dated 11-28-04 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:15-17
Sustained | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:18-217:8
Sustained | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter 7 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:9-10
Sustained | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:11
Sustained | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:12
Sustained | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:13-15
Sustained | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:16-24
Sustained | + +7 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, [REDACTED] modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "to [REDACTED], 09/03/08." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 102. | All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists 8 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(items not provided) | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:25-218:2
Sustained | +| 103. | All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:3-10
Sustained | +| 104. | Jeffrey Epstein criminal records | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:12-17
Sustained | +| 105. | All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:18-22
Sustained | +| 106. | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:22-23
No ruling; catch all | +| 107. | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 108. | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits | 12 | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 109. | ██████████ reserves all objections to Epstein's Exhibits | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 110. | ██████████ reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit List | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 111. | By listing an Exhibit, ██████████ is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same. | Not an exhibit | Not an exhibit | +| 112. | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to ██████████ objections. | Not an exhibit | Not addressed at hearing; catch all | +| 113. | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by ██████████ Edwards on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations. | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14
Sustained because of breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice to specific documents being produced as set forth above. Specific documents must be culled out; all documents on the docket may not be identified; ██████████ must narrow scope | +| 114. | Edwards' Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto, and all Undisputed Facts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 226:15-227:14
Overruled | + +&#x27; In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "and/or Property Receipts." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED] 'Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
115.All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery.3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 227:15-229:17
Overruled. [REDACTED] is ordered to produce/cull out within 15 days, if the documents have not already been produced
116.All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
117.All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:18-20
Deferred
118.All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:21-24
Deferred
119.All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 229:25-231:5
Deferred
120.Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
(duplicative of Exhibit No. 8)		12/5/17 Tr. 231:6-9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statement.
121.Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 231:10-18
Sustained
122.All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 231:19-20
Sustained
123.All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not addressed at hearing
124.Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept.3, 4, 7, 8, 10
duplicative of 45		12/5/17 Tr. 231:21-232:4
Deferred
125.Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 20173, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13Not addressed at hearing
126.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009Not addressed at hearing
127.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012Not addressed at hearing; no objections
130.Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter.3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not specifically addressed at hearing but duplicative to Exhibit No. 115 and those rulings are incorporated herein
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
131.Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile3, 4, 7, 8Not specifically addressed at hearing, but deferred with Exhibit 63
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 20113, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 232:5-235:9
Deferred
133.Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition93, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Not addressed at hearing; catch all
134.All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
135.Any and all documents produced in this action.12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
136.Any and all depositions taken in this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
137.Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
138.Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
139.Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
140.Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
141.Any and all pleadings filed in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
142.Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all

DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach C my Ii rida this /' day of January, 2018.

+0 THE HONORAB HAFELE CIRCUIT COURT J

In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, has shifted Exhibit Nos. 133 through 142 to Exhibit Nos. 209 through 218. has also identified new exhibits at Exhibit Nos. 133 through 208. This Order does not make any rulings on the new exhibits which may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate.

Copies provided to:

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████████ J. ██████████

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████████ J. ██████████

+
+

██████████ J. ██████████
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████████ J. ██████████

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahonev@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Scott J. Link
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach
+ Angela M. Many
+ Link & Rockenbach, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+Angela@linkrocklaw.com
+Tina@linkrocklaw.com
+Troy@linkrocklaw.com
+Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
+Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
+Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+
+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af4ea84dbb32687f82cdb4348f5e1f5bb156096f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/EFTA02764699.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,991 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 23, + "chars": 72026, + "elapsed_seconds": 21.28, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 535.50537109375, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 535.50537109375, + 111.363037109375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 111.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE ON \nNEWLY DISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS /1ND TO_EXCLUDE DEPOSITION \nTESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO WERE NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 519.2879028320312, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 519.2879028320312, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 134.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCR \\F ROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.82799999999997, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 409.9365234375, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 409.9365234375, + 408.33416748046875 + ], + [ + 225.82799999999997, + 408.33416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Chris R. Rodgers", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 33.660000000000004, + 46.980000000000004 + ], + [ + 131.85736083984375, + 46.980000000000004 + ], + [ + 131.85736083984375, + 61.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 33.660000000000004, + 61.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nVISED MNIBUS MOTION IN '\n INE \nSECTION B TRIAL EXHIBITS)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 492.7479248046875, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 492.7479248046875, + 366.7711181640625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 366.7711181640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.6199951171875, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 237.9305419921875 + ], + [ + 150.6199951171875, + 237.9305419921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 138.51 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 275 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 152 + ], + [ + "Line", + 75 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 158 + ], + [ + "Line", + 76 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 408 + ], + [ + "Line", + 74 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 144 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 173 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764699" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a6a76fe8f124f506def5a248cc1a9980dd25eb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:95d438424c4935b7df50571619fd9b80be07d61162eea796e712e47d803631ac +size 7229 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed5f1807587692807e162f4c915c2d03cb4a0fb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5730ae9dfcda9e9a508cc38ad773e49c90fa36352c281f0760921b390b60bd66 +size 11054 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_8_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_8_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3a7425d54b774bc7ff1fec7888ad88245bc3e5b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764699/_page_8_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0df02ca11e1669f9950da52d28e3eae7a975039c83fbc524e2698ede0939afa4 +size 8318 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34dcf3806f7c7add7961ab8a07f851a6d7b970a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.md @@ -0,0 +1,747 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +#### A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION IMINE ON NEWLY DISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS AND TO EXCLUDE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO WERE NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER + +cos + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine on Newly Disclosed Trial Exhibits and to Exclude Deposi T ony of Witnesses Who Were Not Deposed in this Matter, and as grounds therefo as follows: + +- 1. Epstein's motion is misleading and is nothing more than a pointless attempt to make a mountain out of ainole M. Pursuant to the Court's July 20, 2017 Pre-Trial Order, timely produced copies of all 79 trial exhibits that Epstein's motion seeks to categorically exclude. These exhibits were produced along with 130+ additional exhibits in November of 2017. +- 2. Immediately after the December 7, 2017 hearing in this case, undersigned counsel's office realized that, through oversight, its November 3, 2017 Amended Exhibit List was the wrong version of that pleading because it inadvertently left off the descriptions of 79 exhibits that had already been Produced to defense counsel. So, although the filed exhibit list needed to be corrected, + +adv. Epstein Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +all of the exhibits were already in the hands of defense counsel. In fact, at the December 5, 2017 hearing, Epstein's counsel noted that at least one of the numbered exhibits did not match to the corresponding exhibit that had been provided. See 12/5/17 Tr. at 161-62 (copy attached as Exhibit + +3. On December 7, 2017, filed the correct version fps Exhibit List. Undersigned counsel's office emailed Epstein's counsel that same day exp this inadvertent error. A copy of the email is attached as Exhibit "B". + +4. Pursuant to the Court's Order on Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section B, was required to produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that had not previously . . been produced by no later than December 20, 2 py of the Court' Order is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". + +5. Given that the 79 e ue had been produced in October of 2017, is in full compliance with this O xhibit "C". + +6. Epstein's tpyjLest to nonetheless categorically exclude all 79 exhibits that were produced in November of 2017, simply because undersigned counsel's office inadvertently filed the wrong vet ion of its exhibit list, is an extreme sanction that is not warranted. In essence, the Court woulik strilcing December 7, 2017 Amended Exhibit List pleading, which is the "most extreme sanction which can be imposed by a court." See K&K World Enter., Inc. v. Union SPOL., S.R.O., 692 So. 2d 1000, 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Striking Amended Exhibit List due to undersigned counsel's office having inadvertently filed the wrong copy of that pleading would impermissibly punish Mr. the litigant, for that mistake. See Paris Intern. Records + +willful or flagrant disregard of the court's authority."). & Filmworks, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 539 So. 2d 5, 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (reversing a trial court's ruling "striking . . . pleadings and granting the affirmative relief ... based on the failure of defense counsel to appear at a case management conference [which], without more, is too severe a sanction to impose upon a litigant where, as here, the record is devoid of any evidence refleWg counsel's Ac, + +adv. Epstein Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +7. Moreover, Epstein has clearly suffered no prejudice from thisi)dvertent error, as Epstein received copies of the 79 exhibits at issue months ago. + +8. Thus, rather than categorically excluding that were timely provided pursuant to the Court's order, the Court should consid ibility of each individual exhibit. While it is M' position that all exhibits et t and material to the issues to be tried in this case, undersigned counsel will not s to uce any of these 79 exhibits or deposition testimony in the presence of the j and until the Court has ruled outside of the jury's presence that is entitl Given the significant remaining pre-trial motions and issues that remain to be h submits that the Court should simply defer on ruling until raises the issues ou ide the presence of the jury. + +9. i For those reasons, Epstein's Motion in Limine should either be denied or the Court should War ,the individual admissibility of each exhibit and designated deposition transcript until raised at trial. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of February, 2018. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +David P. Vitale Jr. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +adv. Epstein Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits Case No.: 502009CA0.10800XXXXMBAC + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppell Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. Ed + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.co Angela®Iinkrockla corn; Link & Rockenbach, . 1555 Palm B Suite 301 West P FL 33401 Phone: (5' 727-3600 Fax: (561)- 7-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein tt@linkrocklaw.com; ICam®IinkrocIdaw.com; ya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Boulevard + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Newly Filed Exhibits +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +VOI,Xei ;' ') + +# TRANSC 0;T P ROCEEDINGS + +DATE TA TIME: PLACE BEFI;k1,44V uesday, December 5th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 4:35 p.m. 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +is cause came on to be heard at the time and place aid, when and where the following proceedings were ed by: + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +> 1 1 + +1 2 3 4 5 6 is the video of the search warrant of my client's home -- while being executed, the search. I don't have the video, but I presume by that -- it wasn't produced, but I presume by that description, it is the same ruling. + +7 8 9 THE COURT: The same ruling as in I the application for the search warran sustained. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 V MR. SCAROLA: Let me jus nt out to te)ng is listed because the victims, i' t i these three, give detaile iptions of where they were in the e and what the interior looked like 1 of that is corrobor he search warrant video. Your Honor that the reason + +17 18 19 20 2 THE AT: Again, it's with the prov nd caveat that I will re-examine ch of these exhibits, if need be, when the ontext is pointed out. But for now, the same ruling is being issued. + +22 23 24 25 N MS. ROCKENBACH: Number 18 -- actually, 17. It's identified on the exhibit list by Mr. as the application for a search warrant of my client's home. And it's + +1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 possible that by mistake Mr. Scarola's office produced a different document, because what was produced in this context was an order sealing affidavit and application for search warrant and related tic search warrant and inventory in return. An custodian of records for BellSouth, T hS attached to that were the subpoenas to t • 44 ..) and Cingular. So it looks like ph ( e records. + +11 12 MR. SCAROLA: Sounds exhibit. wrong + +13 14 15 16 17 MS. ROCKENBACH. lids like the wrong exhibit, but we w o ject to -- on the same basis tjrat application for the i:::2 search w not be r nt, would be prejudicial - f Mr. Epstein's home would + +18 19 COURT: I have already indicated e same as to number 17. + +20 21A MS. ROCKENBACH: Eighteen, Your Honor, the complaint. + +22 23 24 THE COURT: That, again, is typically a matter of judicial notice, so we will deal with it, if we need to, at a later time. + +25 "All records of homes, properties, bank + +From: Chris R. Rodgers Sent: December 20, 2017 3:59 PM To: Scott!. Link Subject: RE: Regarding: M, adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) CaselD: CategorylD: IntakeCase: SentFromSession: 10201635 0 0 CRODGERSW10.crodgers.12/20/2017 2:49:09 PM + +Thank you. + +From: Scott J. Link (mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) Sent: December 20, 2017 3:58 PM To: Chris R. Rodgers Cc: Tina L. ; Jack Scarola ; id P. Vitale Jr. ; Kimberly Marsh ; Mary Mc nn ; Kara Berard Rockenbach / ' / ,I, Subject: Re: Regarding: MI adv. Epstein (File #: 29187c + +Of course. Scott + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 Email: scott linkrocklaw.com + +![](_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg) + +CIVIL TRIAL& APP LLATE LAW This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please + +confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Chris R. Rodgers wrote: + +Hey Tina, + +EXHIBIT + +We are having data download speed issues with some of our exhibits. While we hope to get you these exhibits by the end of today, our fear is that the download delay might take longer + +than expected (actually, it already has). Given that, and in an abundance of be willing to extend to us a one day extension to provide you with the missing exhibits? ould you + +Thank you for your understanding with this matter, + +Chris Rodgers + +From: Chris R. Rodgers + +Sent: December 7 2017 8:47 AM + +To: 'Tina la' + +Cc: Jack Scarola ; David P. Vitale Jr. . Kimberly Marsh ; Mary McCann - Scott J. Link N \_ ; Kara Berard Rockenbach Subject: Regarding: ,IME adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) + +Good Morning Tina, + +Yesterday it was discovered that we inadvertently attached an incorr t vdrsion of our Exhibit List to our Unilateral Pre-Trial Stipulation which was filed on November 15, 2017. While the exhibit list provided in this filing was incorrect, the actual exhibit documents forwarded to you on November 9, 2017 were correct. As an example, the 11/09/17 provided exhibits go to number 207, while the 11/15/17 Exhibit List stops at number 142. You will notice that the correct Exhibit List (attached) corresponds correctly to the provided exhibits. To correct this error, we are filing this correct Exhibit List today — as our Second Amended Exhibit List. Please e-mail or call with any concerns, or questions, regarding this correction. + +www.searrviaw.rom Chris R. Rodgers + +Senior Litigation Parale • al Investi • ator + +rrorigerstasearrvlaw cone P: (561) 686-6300 ext. 145 F: (561) 383-9451 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + + + +\*\*\*\*\* I Privileged and Confidential I Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAC + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. Ma individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN'OF EFFREY EPSTEIN'S REVI ED NIBUS O MINE SECTION B HIBIT + +(.3 + +Co ) + +THIS MATTER came before the Cou 6,6 rrt g on November 29, 2017, and December 5, 2017, upon Section B (NM Trial ibit 0) of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintifl7Counter-Defenda re pstein ("Epstein") (D.E. 1070). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the (MR') (D.E. 1089 the premises, it is by fled by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. eying heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in + +ORDfiRED ACID ADJUDGED that: + +&#x27; Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine was directed at MR Amended Exhibit List dated November 9, 211.3.E. 1043.) On December 7, 2017, after two days of hearing and substantive Court rulings, filed a Second Amended Exhibit List (D.E. 1 109) identifying 79 new items anding some of his earlier disclosed exhibits. This Order only addresses the exhibits identified on November 9, 2017, Exhibit List. To the extent any exhibit numbers have been replaced with different items or new numbers have been added, those will be subject to aseparate Order after the appropriate motion and hearing. The rulings set forth herein for all exhibits disclosed on 1.1 December 7,2017, Second Amended Exhibit List that have not been modified will remain unchanged. + +![](_page_11_Picture_11.jpeg) + +I. On or before December 20.2017, Fahal I produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial with the exception of Exhibit No. 1 13 which is addressed separately in paragraph 2 below. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219, 226, 228.) + +2. On or before January 5, 2018, Ill=shal I produce to Epstein the s i rc court filings to be used as trial exhibits from the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedi ne oes #1 and #2. v. United States of America, U.S. District Court, Southern District of and ase No. 08 shall not produce each and every item identified on the Court's docket, cull out the specific items tion to Exhibit No. 113 as 80736-Civ-Marrae designated as GM Trial Exhibit No. he intends to use at trial. The Court hereby sustains E•• being overbroad. The Court will revisit this ruling a narrows the documents he intends to introduce at trial. (12/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226: . + +3. As set forth in more detai w, tit Court has sustained Epstein's objections to a number of trial exhibits. to,5e o ctions will be sustained unless there is a showing at trial that the exhibits are relevant and material to the issues to be determined. For example, exhibits may be admissible if theyrelate to three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe), if they relate to issues concerni Edwards' preparation and evaluation of his clients' cases, or for any other reason enunc" by )he Court on the record at the November 29, 2017 and December 5, 2017 hearings. instances, will be allowed to speak generically about the facts surroun those exhibits, but will not necessarily be allowed to introduce the exhibits at trial without further Order of the Court. The Court will make decisions on an item-by-item basis at the appropriate time. Any discussions relating to an exhibit to which an objection has been sustained shall be conducted outside the presence of the jury. (12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24; 198:19-199:5.) + +4. As set forth in more detail below, the Court defers rulings on Epstein's objections directed to I= trial exhibits concerning Epstein's net worth and in support of punitive damages claim. The Court will address these objections at the appropriate time. (12/5/17 Tr. 163:17-164:15.) + +5. The Court makes the following specific findings: + +## LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS: + +I — All Objections — All Objections except Authenticity - Relevance — Probative value substantially outweighed b danr6f unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or nett. .resentation of cumulative evidence — Privileged - Opinion — Hearsay — Authenticity — Other (please identify basis — Completeness I — Overbroad — Not provided to Co Epstein Prior to Filing Pretrial Stipulation — Not a proper OA — Trade secrets/C + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 1. | All applicable criminal statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 2. | All applicable Florida Statutes | 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 3. | Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes, airplanes and automobiles | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | 11/29/17 Tr. 160:6-162:15
Deferred | +| 4. | Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase of books "SM 101: A realistic Introduction," "Slave Craft: Roadmap for Erotic Servitude-Principles, Skills and Tools" and "Training Miss Abernathy:

A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners" | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 11/29/17 Tr. 162:16-167-9
Sustained | +| 5. | Non-Prosecution Agreement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 11/29/17 Tr. 167:11-13
Overruled | + +| No. | [REDACTED] 'Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 6. | Jane Doe 102 Complaint | 3, 4, 7, 13 | 11/29/17 Tr. 167:14-170:9
Sustained | +| 7. | Messages taken from message pads found at Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | 11/29/17 Tr. 171:22-176:9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statements. | +| 8. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14 | 11/29/17 Tr. 176:10-187:8
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statements. | +| 9. | Jeffrey Epstein flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 64:8-81:17: 85:11-22
Sustained | +| 10. | Jeffrey Epstein phone records | 3, 4, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 81:18-82:17: 146:14-149:19: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 11. | [REDACTED] phone records | 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 149:20-150:1; 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 12. | Jail Visitation Logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 150:2-3: 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 13. | Jeffrey Epstein's probation file | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 150:4-152:11; 159:12-160:7
Sustained | +| 14. | All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 152:14-153:13
Deferred | +| 15. | Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 153:16-160:24
Sustained | +| 16. | Video of Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home being executed 2 | 3, 4, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 160:25-161:21
Sustained | +| 17. | Application for Search Warrant of Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, Cannot be read | 12/5/17 Tr. 160:25-162:19
Sustained | +| 18. | Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints | 3, 4, 7, 13, 12 (as to "subsequent Amended Complaints") | 12/5/17 Tr. 162:20-24
Deferred | + += In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Video of Epstein Property Inspection 01/18/10." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Lim ine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19. | All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 162:25-164:15
Deferred | +| 20. | Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy) | 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 163:4-5; 164:16-19
Sustained | +| 21. | Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy) | Cannot be read, 3, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:20-24
Sustained | +| 22. | List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 164:25-165:5
Deferred | +| 23. | Yearbooks of Jane Doe | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16;
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 24. | 2002 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 25. | 2001 Palm Beach High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 26. | 2003 Palm Beach Gardens High School Year Book | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 165:6-166:16
166:25-167:6
Not produced
Deferred | +| 27. | Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home 3 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, | 12/5/17 Tr. 166:15-24
Sustained | + +3 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(from Palm Beach State Attorney's File, Exhibit #29)." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 28. | Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 167:7-168:16
Sustained in part and overruled in part. The impact upon the issues as to preparedness, knowledge, as far as Mr. [REDACTED] is concerned – his diligence as to discovery – if those are called into question, then this exhibit may be discussed. The actual documents themselves are excessive and would be getting into other matters that would not be germane to [REDACTED] three clients and, therefore, may not be used until discussed outside the presence of the jury | +| 29. | The Palm Beach State Attorney's Criminal file against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 168:17-175:1
Sustained in part and overruled in part. If [REDACTED] had access to formulate his positions as to the legitimacy of his three clients' claims, this file may come into play. The sheer amount of the criminal file would also be relevant to Mr. Epstein's state of mind at the time he filed the underlying Complaint. The individual pages are not subject to admission and would need to be discussed outside the presence of the jury. | +| 30. | All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-179:25
Deferred | +| 31. | Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 175:2-180:5
Deferred | +| 32. | List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name | 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13,
The exhibit provided was an entire Motion (which was denied) not just the identified item. | 12/5/17 Tr. 180:23-181:12
Deferred | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------| +| 33. | All ofleffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for | | | +| | | 3, 4, I I, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 188:23-192:17 | +| 34. | All discovery related responses ofJeffrey Epstein | | | +| | | 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 | 7--^-lar. | +| 35. | Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative | | 192:18-22 | +| | Defenses in all civil cases against him | | Deferred | +| 36. | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was | | | +| | | 3, 4, I I, 12, 13. \`:-. | | +| 37. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and | | | +| | | . 4,., ,, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 38. | Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimo | | | +| | 502008CA028051XXXXIM "AB d W. v. | | | +| | | 3, 4, I I, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 39. | Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and | | | +| | | 3, 4, II, 12, 13 | Not addressed at hearing | +| 40. | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, I I, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 193:3-194:22 | +| 41. | Repo nti,apalysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 194:23-195:1 | +| 42. | Video ootage (DVD) of walk through site | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/I 7 Tr. 195:2-195:15 | +| 43. | Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, | | | +| 44. | Probable Cause Affidavitsprepared against | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 195:19-196:2 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 45. | Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's donations to law enforcement | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:3-19
Sustained | +| 46. | Victim Notification Letter from US Attorney's Office to Victims 4 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 196:20-197:2
Sustained | +| 47. | Expert Dr. L. Dennison [REDACTED] Report of Victim | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:3-23
Sustained | +| 48. | Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 4/20/06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 197:24-198:10
Sustained | +| 49. | All reports and documentation generated by Palm Beach Police Department related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 50. | All Witness Statements generated by Palm Beach Police Department relating to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 51. | Passenger Manifests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft and private plane flight logs | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 198:13-199:6
Sustained | +| 52. | Passenger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:8
Sustained | +| 53. | Letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Alberto Pinto regarding house island project | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 199:9-25
Sustained | +| 54. | Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 55. | Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:1-3
Deferred | +| 56. | MC2 emails involving communications of Jeffrey Epstein, Jeff Fuller, Maritza Vasquez, Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:4-18
Not Produced
Reserved ruling because documents not available | +| 57. | DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 8, 12, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:19-22
Sustained | +| 58. | Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08 | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:23-24
Sustained | +| 59. | Massage Table 5 | 3, 4, 12 (document marked as No. 59 is not a massage table) | 12/5/17 Tr. 200:25-201:21
Sustained | + +In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "(CW & SR) 07/09/2008." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's rulin holds. + +In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated 07/25/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate. + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 60. | No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 61. | Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 62. | Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Community Control and Probation | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 201:22-202:8
Sustained | +| 63. | Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Registrations (from various states) | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 202:9-203:4
Deferred | +| 64. | Jeffrey Epstein's Booking photograph | 3, 4, 7, 8,
Document says
cannot rely on this
for legal action | 12/5/17 Tr. 203:5-204:2
Deferred | +| 65. | CAD calls to 358 EL BRILLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 204:3-11
Sustained | +| 66. | List of Jeffrey Epstein's House contacts | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(document
provided is not
reflective of
description) | 12/5/17 Tr. 204:12-205:12
Sustained | +| 67. | Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's investments | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 205:13-15
Deferred | +| 68. | Letter from Chief Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 205:16-22; 206:2-207:14; 209:15-210:5
Sustained | +| 69. | List of planes owned by Jeffrey Epstein 6 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12
(document
provided does not
match
description), 14 | 12/15/17 Tr. 205:23-25
Deferred | +| 70. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-11-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 71. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 1-13-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 72. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 2-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | +| 73. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9
Sustained | + +6 In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, changed the description of this exhibit to: "Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report ate 19/06 (unredacted)." This Order does not make any rulings on the new description and may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems'appropriate. + +| No. | ' Exhibit Description | Epstein's | | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------------------| +| 74. | Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 207:15-209:9 | +| 75. | Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 209:10-12: 210:6-21 | +| 76. | All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury | 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 | | +| | | | formula s positions as to the | +| 77. | Docume related to the rental of a vehicle for | 'i | | +| | ? S y | | | +| 78. | Ted's Sheds Documents | | | +| 79. | Documents related to- operty searches of Jeffrey | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:1-4 | +| 80. | Arrest Warrafirk t a | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:5-7 | +| 81. | Police r‘o7t regarding picking up | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:8-15 | +| | money dated 1 1 -28-04 | | Sustained | +| 82. | LS of-Trilateral Commission Members of 2003 | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 212:16-213:1 | +| 83. | Alan Dershowitz Letter dated 4-19-06 and Statute | | | +| | | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr, 213:2-214:8 | +| 84. | Guy Fronstin letter dated 4-17-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:9-11 | +| 85. | Jeffrey Epstein Account Information | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:12-20 | + +| No. | Exhibit Description | Epstein's Objections | Court's Ruling | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 86. | Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:21-24
Sustained | +| 87. | JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
Sustained | +| 88. | Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 214:25-215:3
Sustained | +| 89. | Flight information for ████████████████████ | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
Sustained | +| 90. | Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:4-5
Sustained | +| 91. | Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes.re Maria | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:6-8
Sustained | +| 92. | Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case | 3, 4, 12 (document provided is not what is identified on list), 13 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:9-17
Deferred | +| 93. | Jeffrey Epstein 5 th Amendment Speech | 3, 4, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:18-20
Deferred. References to deposition excerpts not ruled upon fully; subject to specific line reference rulings which will be subject to a separate order | +| 94. | Reiter letter to Krisher dated 5-1-06 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 215:21-216:14
Not produced
Deferred | +| 95. | ████████████████████ Police Report dated 11-28-04 | 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:15-17
Sustained | +| 96. | Victim's school records and transcripts | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 216:18-217:8
Sustained | +| 97. | Victim Notification letter 7 | 3, 4, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:9-10
Sustained | +| 98. | Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:11
Sustained | +| 99. | Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale | 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:12
Sustained | +| 100. | All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Jeffrey Epstein's home | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:13-15
Sustained | +| 101. | Emails received from Palm Beach Records related to Jeffrey Epstein | 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 | 12/5/17 Tr. 217:16-24
Sustained | + +&#x27; In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "to a. 09/03/08.' The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ailing holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED] 'Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
102.All items listed on the Palm Beach Police Property Report Lists83, 4, 7, 8, 12
(items not provided)		12/5/17 Tr. 217:25-218:2
Sustained
103.All copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 218:3-10
Sustained
104.Jeffrey Epstein criminal records3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 218:12-17
Sustained
105.All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11,12/5/17 Tr. 218:18-22
Sustained
106.Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and transcripts taken in connection with this and all related cases and exhibits thereto3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 218:22-23
No ruling; catch all
107.Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in preparation for this litigation by any party to this cause3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
108.Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
109.[REDACTED] reserves all objections to Epstein's ExhibitsNot an exhibitNot an exhibit
110.[REDACTED] reserves the right to supplement and/or amend his Exhibit ListNot an exhibitNot an exhibit
111.By listing an Exhibit, [REDACTED] is not waiving his right to object to same at trial and does not waive their right to amend same.Not an exhibitNot an exhibit
112.All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to [REDACTED] objections.Not an exhibitNot addressed at hearing; catch all
113.All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by [REDACTED] Edwards on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 218:25-226:14
Sustained because of breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice to specific documents being produced as set forth above. Specific documents must be culled out; all documents on the docket may not be identified; [REDACTED] must narrow scope
114.[REDACTED] Motions for Summary Judgment, all attachments thereto, and all Undisputed Facts3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 226:15-227:14
Overruled

° In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, modified this exhibit to include additional descriptive language: "and/or Property Receipts." The Court finds that this language does not substantially change the exhibit and, thus, the Court's ruling holds.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.[REDACTED] 'Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
115.All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery.3, 4, 7, 8, 1212/5/17 Tr. 227:15-229:17
Overruled. [REDACTED] is ordered to produce/cull out within 15 days, if the documents have not already been produced
116.All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
117.All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:18-20
Deferred
118.All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1312/5/17 Tr. 229:21-24
Deferred
119.All Settlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 1412/5/17 Tr. 229:25-231:5
Deferred
120.Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
(duplicative of Exhibit No. 8)		12/5/17 Tr. 231:6-9
Deferred. Not to be mentioned during opening statement.
121.Photo depicting [REDACTED], Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew3, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 231:10-18
Sustained
122.All flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 1212/5/17 Tr. 231:19-20
Sustained
123.All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not addressed at hearing
124.Evidence of contributions to the Palm Beach Police Dept.3, 4, 7, 8, 10
duplicative of 45		12/5/17 Tr. 231:21-232:4
Deferred
125.Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Expert Report, Attachments and Back-up Documents, October 20, 20173, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13Not addressed at hearing
126.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Complaint, December 7, 2009Not addressed at hearing
127.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim, February 21, 20133, 4, 7, 13Not addressed at hearing
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M., Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, August 16, 2012Not addressed at hearing; no objections
130.Brad Edward's [sic] Times Records and Billing Records related to this matter.3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12Not specifically addressed at hearing but duplicative to Exhibit No. 115 and those rulings are incorporated herein
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Exhibit DescriptionEpstein's ObjectionsCourt's Ruling
131.Jeffrey Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender Registry Profile3, 4, 7, 8Not specifically addressed at hearing, but deferred with Exhibit 63
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, February 25, 20113, 4, 7, 812/5/17 Tr. 232:5-235:9
Deferred
133.Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition93, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Not addressed at hearing; catch all
134.All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto.3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
135.Any and all documents produced in this action.12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
136.Any and all depositions taken in this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
137.Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
138.Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
139.Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action.12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
140.Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal12Not addressed at hearing; catch all
141.Any and all pleadings filed in this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all
142.Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action12, 13Not addressed at hearing; catch all

DONE AND ORD in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach C ride this /o day of January, 2

THE HONORAB HAFELE CIRCUIT COURT J

In his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List, has shifted Exhibit Nos. 133 through 142 to Exhibit Nos. 209 through 218. has also identified new exhibits at Exhibit Nos. 133 through 208. This Order does not make any rulings on the new exhibits which may be subject to a new Motion in Limine as Epstein deems appropriate.

Copies provided to:

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████ J. ██████

+
+

██████ J. ██████
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ ██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+ ██████ rc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahonev@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Scott J. Link
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach
+ Angela M. Many
+ Link & Rockenbach, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+Angela@linkrocklaw.com
+Tina@linkrocklaw.com
+Troy@linkrocklaw.com
+Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
+Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
+Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+
+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8e0e8bce2642fd35ab437bec815360a5304d0c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/EFTA02764722.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1119 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 26, + "chars": 66550, + "elapsed_seconds": 20.52, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_11.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION IMINE ON \nNEWLY DISCLOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS AND TO EXCLUDE DEPOSITION \nTESTIMONY OF WITNESSES WHO WERE NOT DEPOSED IN THIS MATTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 316.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 517.765625, + 316.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 517.765625, + 370.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 370.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.3362731933594, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.3362731933594, + 136.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 136.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC 0;T P ROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 391.7286376953125 + ], + [ + 407.64703369140625, + 391.7286376953125 + ], + [ + 407.64703369140625, + 412.5279235839844 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 412.5279235839844 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Chris R. Rodgers", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 33.660000000000004, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 132.23736572265625, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 132.23736572265625, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 33.660000000000004, + 63.99000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 323.136, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 531.6928100585938, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 531.6928100585938, + 140.91455078125 + ], + [ + 323.136, + 140.91455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN'OF EFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nREVI ED NIBUS O MINE \nSECTION B \nHIBIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 493.114501953125, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 493.114501953125, + 367.0831298828125 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 367.0831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGEND FOR EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 359.18402099609375, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 359.18402099609375, + 237.2982177734375 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 237.2982177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 138.51 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 283 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 295 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 152 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 74 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 75 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 149 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 166 + ], + [ + "Line", + 74 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764722" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_11_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_11_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be939790adc9dd91a03a1fce2974fc6522945958 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_11_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b45e02a1e01a5436bbad3fbda97a6046266c5bd3bf208b392564f0b502bb2c0 +size 8012 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9695077bbdd498dd29f2e7b858efbbc23221d5ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764722/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b99a32ac20cdb85012c8d87921c32a5dfc97e2f24cb79e4d5680c3d9a9d679c9 +size 10943 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a6d6689d1f538b94545f465a9a7dc5f7cc1e691 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXKMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +cos + +# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION-(Agreed Date/Time) + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List ..4)' + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that th t tted attorneys will take video deposition(s) of: + +## NAME AND ADDRESS TIME LOCATION + +William Berger February 20, 2018 12:00 noon + +Weiss Handler & Comwell 1 Boca Place 2255 Glades Road Suite 218-A Boca Raton, FL 33431 561-997-9995 + +V1DEOGRAPHER: Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +upon oral examination before Palm Beach Reporting, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11th day of Feb., 2018. + +![]()cc: Palm Beach Reporting (court reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics (videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 4 + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algfin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del &do o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki entim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kök éd. Tanpri kontakte , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parét nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lé ou gen pou w parét nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblém pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1740873a5fa2183aeceda719f57b5360ed5274d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748/EFTA02764748.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764748.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4654, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION-(Agreed Date/Time)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 478.6258239746094, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 478.6258239746094, + 345.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 345.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 461.33441162109375, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 461.33441162109375, + 445.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 445.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 444.69000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 388.62, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 431.73 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 388.62, + 444.69000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 156.32999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764748" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f30bbf01fc8a93dead6b4bb75bcde4ae492c1b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.md @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. i bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, Q SA + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VE3KR. SCAROLA: I thought that that's what it was, but I want that — that's an 2important stipulation. There ought not to • be any ambiguity. 7THE COURT: Mr. Link, are you Willing • to stipulate [hat the actions brought by • Mr. 'on behalf of the three lo individual, that we have lasted by way of either initials or Jane Dee that have been 12at center of this Controversy, were brought :2 in good faith, and that the allegations were II well - founded? is /4R. L3/M: There's adistinction, and 14that's this. Yes, they were brought in good 11faith. Can I say all of the allegations are le true? I can't say that. Your Honor. We If never put them to the test because we 20 couldn't. 21I didn't represent Mr. Epstein at that 22time, sto I think -- when you ask me would I 2) say everything that was pled wog true, 24can't say that. 2f THE COURT: But yOu are saying you're + +willing to stipulate that they we in good faith? MR. LIMO Yes, air, TIC COURT: se sti That can be t Court's attention, it Pendenty of litigation. MA. LIMO hope my atipula 10Tai COURT: ht to the , during the k you, Tour Honor. pad. right, we are up to BACK: I think we were at 3J. were at 40. COURT: Me did 32. MS. ROCKENBACE: Me did 32. IRE COURT: I Indicated that 33 is the next highlighted one. That again, Is a matter judicial notice, and depending upon whatever evidentiary value it may have, those are just answers fn affiroative defenses In the civil cases against him. WS. ROCXBWRALlit Your Honor, I'm sorry. Ithink we also objected to 33. THE COURT: I don't have It + +2 3 10 It Is 1) 14 IS la la tf 2.) II 22 .144kh AS14419' the law, transferable CO asimilar ease. highlighted. MR. =PAOLA X don't have it highlighted on mine either. 7/M COURT: Responses to reguarda for production, requests for admission, answers to interrogatories in this matter. And then there's • list of about 10 or so cases. MS. ROCKENSACII: Those were not this ease before you in division w. And this case nutter, you can -- THE COURT: You're talki about AS? MS. ROCKY-IMAM Tee. Tnra ere all 'OS cases. '09 cases. I re Tour Monet. pe . Scarola Can tell us the tele they would not be relevant to thi Bring seo ry from other lawsuits eras to be Creating mini-trials again with d suit. 4 Is COURT: Well, depending upon the the discovery, and obviously g upon its relevance to the lawsuit we are dealing with here, things like eqaests for admissions may be, pursuant to Answers to interrogatories, the sass/ thing. Theme things that are stated under oath have ason concrete type Of affect than those that are not stated under oath. So what's your position, Mr. Scarola? MR. SCAROLA: Let me just state broadly, Your Honor, that as has been acknowledged in earlier argument before the Court, there is clearly an issue with regard to Native and Intent on Jeffrey Epstein's part. And it is our theory of the case that Jeffrey Epstein singled out MN NM because he was leading a joint prosecution effort that Included anumber of other lawyers prosecuting multiple other Cases, and that Brad was mingled out, not only because of his leadership role, but because he faced aparticular vulnerability. And what Mr. Epstein was attempting to do was to extort into either abandoning or cosine:lasing the interest of his clients and backing off on the prosecution of the Grim Victims' Rights Act case, which Mr. UM was prosecuting on a + +• + +9 + +pro bc:no basis almost independently. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59e46f22238757d6a68034b73abd321101c13725 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753/EFTA02764753.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764753.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 11816, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.27, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_65.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED \nJURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VEJack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of ██████████ rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

CERTIFIED LAWYER
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764759/EFTA02764759.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764759/EFTA02764759.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41c0446d24c058746e3fb2922576acd3177d8ef1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764759/EFTA02764759.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764759.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 9883, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND F Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR CASE MANAG NFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 470.93218994140625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 470.93218994140625, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "it 4. Section 90.612, Florida Statutes co 'Mode and order of interrogation \nand presentation\" of witnesses and evidence apt vi :", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 542.8671875, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 542.8671875, + 390.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 390.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764759" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d937b2a72c2b73da3c450c5e70cebf156ce89371 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.md @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARIN'C4t ,) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED the icndersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: February 27, 2018 TIME: 8:45 a.m. JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +EDWARDS' MOTION IN LIMINE RE COMPARISON BETWEEN SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS [FILED 2.6.18] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. ( 14/ + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forebiniwas sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4 11— day of + +OLA + +ar No.: 169440 + +ey E-Mail: isxasearcvlaw.com; and ccann@searcylaw.corn + +rimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Esquire staffefile®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®,agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®F Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. 4c- + +Kara Berard Rock€n h, Esquire kara®Iinkrodflaw.co tbermudez®flacivillaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 P each Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Pal h, FL 33409 Phone: (561 727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Cos + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. blurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Fax: (954)-745-3556 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 C iS )9 + +"1f you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pon w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn tajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk éd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +t..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..610a3cf15c8110f099eb662bb661041e4f9e32b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764/EFTA02764764.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764764.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4571, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARIN'C4t ,)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 379.46649169921875, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 379.46649169921875, + 359.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 359.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 561.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 280.87847900390625, + 561.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 280.87847900390625, + 576.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 576.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 352.6312561035156, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 352.6312561035156, + 148.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 148.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764764" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e31824386c1b9e771cadcd1ae8f8f84056ffef1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.md @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +I + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t Ac undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 1, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. ' CA)CLe + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205.N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM 10-I) + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +MOTION FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING EPSTEIN'S FIFTH AMENDMENT ASSERTIONS TO FINANCIAL DISCOVERY AND APRIL 15, 2011 REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> X Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. 14/ .) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forcing) was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this I u' day of + +OLA + +No.: 169440 + +y E-Mail: jsx®earcylaw.com; and cann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Id enfim ld bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + ++'o.) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5e70f157426d1de9e940f77bb16f0543481a6f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769/EFTA02764769.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764769.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4905, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 358.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 358.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.40771484375, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.40771484375, + 575.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 575.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764769" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69f6a27a8b17fef9f385051ee8e31eedcb2db62c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT ARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti o t efendant, Jeffrey Epstein, herby postpones the following hearing at the time s , before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach Co ouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida + +MOTION: Defen ter-Plaintiff J. January 18, 2018, Motion in dressing the Admissibility of Exhibit 132 + +PIai ru iff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition + +DA esday, February 20, 2018 + +T . 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +nkrocklaw.com 4 3 Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 903) Angela M. Many (Fctft2 Primary: Scott@linkrockliw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 19, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +(S•iSit e Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91028c882b4e98316da74f2e16df9464efeee196 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774/EFTA02764774.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764774.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5668, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT ARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 447.6845703125, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 447.6845703125, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764774" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79bf1285ff0e8023d7316fb2bcc53e4577dfff1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED +10 SEP 17 PM 3:39 +BUCK. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +DEFENDANT ██████ EDWARDS INTERROGATORIES +TO PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. Edwards, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that General Interrogatories numbered 1 through 16 have been directed to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, this 16th day of September, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 16th day of September, 2010. + +*[Handwritten signature of Jack Scarola]* + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for ██████ J. ██████ + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED] Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4771c2d0e363d9ebf4b870eb12f7c0f70cc22d4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777/EFTA02764777.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764777.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2189, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.33799999999997, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 348.45, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 348.45, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 256.33799999999997, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764777" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a1d8e9203bd4d22b5226da62d05f5764936433c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## CROSS NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +A Cos + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that ul ay. February 20. 2018, at 12:00 9.m. at the law offices of Weiss, Handler & Corn 11, oca Place, 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218-A, Boca Raton, Florida 33431, Plaint efendant Jeffrey Epstein will take the videotaped deposition by oral examinatio es of discovery and for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of: + +WILLIAM BERGER + +The pfrdeposition will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer au to administer oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and ape who is neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who is neither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +The video equipment will be operated by Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 16, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Su 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: / L nk + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken BN 44903) Angela M. M,y4B 680) Primary: Scott(iblirtkrocklaw.com Primary: araAlinkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®linIcrocklaw.com Segdh TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trovalinkrocklaw.com : Tanya( linkrocklaw.com dary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +'Saar Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, D a, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Pal kes Boulevard West ch, FL 33409 me jsx@,searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com Co-Counselor De J. law c m + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsQFLAapellateLaw.com kbteFLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counselor De J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db6b58fbdc5094b4423dc5449acc019df3fb662c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779/EFTA02764779.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764779.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4325, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CROSS NOTICE OF TAKING \nDEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 467.9622802734375, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 467.9622802734375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 512.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 512.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764779" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f7e87fa8aba17edb3e53655338b311d308caec1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXlvD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF Y EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey rein "EPstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370, responds to Defe un Plaintiff February 6, 2018, Requests for A i follows: + +- 1. The printout of yo a York State Sex Offender registration page attached [to the Request] as Exbit is authentic. + +E • ot admit or deny this request because he has no control over or personal c about the authenticity of the registration attached as Exhibit `A' to Request. + +e information contained in the printout of your New York State Sex Offender registration page attached [to the Request] as Exhibit 'A' is accurate. + +## RESPONSE + +Epstein cannot admit or deny this request because any response would require the disclosure of information which could communicate a statement of fact that is testimonial in nature. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). There is a + +substantial and reasonable basis for concern that such testimonial statements of fact could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute him in future criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). Additionally, Epstein cannot respond to this request without waiving his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 2, 9 and 16 of the Florida Constitution. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys Service List below on February 20, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal p Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). ed on the o Florida + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBACH 1555 Palm Beach Lakes o lud, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Flori 33 1 (561) 727-3600; ( 72 I [fax] + +By. / + +Scott 602991) ICa ockenbach (FBN 44903) M. any (FBN 26680) Scott( linkrocklaw.com : Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com " Trial Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +2012123 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..095eec4c642d542f925a385747624ce9d02e62e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782/EFTA02764782.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764782.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6737, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF Y EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nREQUESTS FOR ADMISSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 517.59 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 517.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 194.51373291015625, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 194.51373291015625, + 640.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 640.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 183.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 183.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764782" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764785/EFTA02764785.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764785/EFTA02764785.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44b4c565b96271fcddf405ec7b16ae6642d238c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764785/EFTA02764785.md @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT NOTICE OF FILING RETURN OF EPSTEIN'S AFFIDAVIT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Eps following: chi"), hereby gives notice of the + +- 1. On February 12, 2018 m's counsel provided Rock Legal Services with a Subpoena Duces Tecum for Trial s on LM, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. + - 2. Rock Legal Se as made multiple attempts to serve the Subpoena upon LM + +as follows: + +A Cos + +- 2/13/18 at 10:45 a.m. No answer at residence, but vehicle present. 15/18 at 10:29 a.m. — Residence's private gate/fence was closed and locked; notice was left on the gate with the server's information. 2/15/18 at 6:34 p.m. — Server's notice had been removed; gate was locked. Witness made telephone contact with the server who was advised to attempt service the next day. +- d. 2/16/18 at 7:37 a.m. Gate was still locked/no access to property. +- e. 2/16/18 at 8:40 a.m. Server called witness' phone number and left message. +- f. 2/17/18 at 4:36 p.m. Server called witness' phone number, but no answer and no access to door. +- g. 2/19/18 at 9:45 a.m. Server called but no answer. On attempting service, server saw a female through the front of the residence, but no one + +would answer the door. Two dogs were let out the back door of the residence as server was headed back to his vehicle. + +See Return of Non-Service attached as Exhibit B. + +3. Although Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. informed the Court that LM is going to testify at the trial of this matter, it is clear from her actions that she is not being cooperative and is avoiding service of process. Epstein's counsel, therefore, is eeking the assistance of the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office to serve the Subpoena. AS + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished Service List below on February 20, 2018, through the Co Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). torneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +LIN I f1KENBACH, PA 1 each Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 P m Beach, Florida 33401 \* (56 27-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +> y: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott©Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003000CMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SC TT R TH TE individually, and J. 1 T individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +I + +STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Eirnut North Loxahatchee, FL 33470 E0 4 + +\.) + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUWRIAL + +/-• YOU ARE COMMANDED to tippetfr before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, Judge of the Circuit Court, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom IOC, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on March 13, 2018, at 9:30 a.m.t and to have with you at that time and place thslocuments ( identified on Exhibit A. + +If yo ail produce these documents during your testimony at trial, you may be in eontem rt. You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this Subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you must respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +This case is special set on a 10-day jury trial docket commencing on Mamh 13, 2018. It is not likely you will be called on the first day of trial. We will coordinate your appearance with your counsel, J. + +DATED: February 12, 2018. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this deposition, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Scott J. Link, Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days: if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.** + +### EXHIBIT A + +# DEFINITIONS + +1. "Communication" or "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation or statement of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limited to, any documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice recordings, video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, discussions, interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, notes, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. + +2. "Document" or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consis N w thSillonda Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (which is incorporated in this definition as if full%et rth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +a. All written, paper or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited to: (S books, brochures, calendars, employment files, announcements, meeting +O minutes, records of meetings, records of conversations, newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations, facsimile transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books, agreements, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, invoices, financial statements, bank statements, receipts, communications, interoffice and interoffice exchanges, conversations, inquiries, replies, correspondence, and letters, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of any other transmittal smittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agendas, notices, + +devices, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; + +- b. Graphic or auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pictures, voice messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoin c• +- c. Electronically stored informatio c , mechanical and electrical including, but not limited to: all electronic communica messages, e-mails, instant messages, records or representations computer logs, n s, Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presentationfiles, database files, desktop publishing files, source code files, object code files, executable files, data files, script files, project management files, text files, portable document format files, tabulated data (Miles, virtual machine files, XML files, webpage files, image files, design + O files, GIS files, system files, compressed files, disk image files, audio files, video files, backup files, metadata and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts, and all non-identical copies of the foregoing (defined herein as "EST; each individual electronically stored document is defined herein as an "ESI document'). + +For purposes of the foregoing, documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any electronic storage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud-based service, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid-state drive, hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraViolet disc, flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone, tablet device, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or net the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Docwnent" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communication" and "Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format" means the file format of pplication in which such CSI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein means any Sf '> person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, firm, corporation, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, association, partnership, business, agency, department, governmental body; bureau, board, commission, or any other form of public or private entity. With respect to an entity, Person shall include all subsidiaries and affiliates of the entity, as well as the present and former directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the control of, the entity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +5. - - The terms "you" or "your" mean L.M., and include all agents and any other person acting under her control or on her behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or "relating to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, consisting of, connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, evidencing, explaining, mentioning, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indirectly, setting forth, showing, or summarizing. + +7. Where appropriate: + +- a. use of the singular includes the plural, and vice versa; +- b. the past tense includes the present tense; +- c. the words "and" and "or" are both conjunctive and disjunctive; +- d. the words "all" and "any" mean "any and all"; +- e. the word "including" means "including without limitation"; and +- f. use of the masculine includes the feminine, and vice versa. + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +1. In response to this Subpoena Duces Tecum, you are required to furnish all information and documents which are, or have been, in your possession, custody, or control, or in your possession, custody, or control. + +# ESI Instructio.. + +2. ESI Production Format. ESI shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as single-page, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each ESI document, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationships must be mainta" Allith/ shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation of data. + +3. Production Media. The production of ESI as described herein shall be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). The Production Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity; (b) the date of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +4. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you contend that any ESI document responsive to this Subpoena is not reasonably accessible: (1) timely identify such ESI document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis for declining to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on access, the likely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, the method used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in which the ESI document is kept. + +5. TIFF Production. ESI produced as TIFF image files shall be produced as follows: (1) each production of TIFF image files shall be accompanied by a corresponding load file ("Image Load File"); (2) each TIFF image file must contain the same information and same physical representation as the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (3) each TIFF image file must not be less than 300 dpi resolution; (4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containing the extracted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created; (5) each extracted to c fiotle shall be named to match the endorsed number assigned to the first page of each extracted text files shall be accompanied by a Co TIFF image files shall be accompanied by S Ssr ., ng TIFF image file; (6) the MST); (7) each production of s-reference load file, such as Opticon ("OPT'), which shall provide the begin d ding endorsed number of each TIFF image file and the number of pages it includes; and 18) each production of TIFF image files must be accompanied by a data load filtData Load File" or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metada e Native Format files from which the TIFF image files were created. Further, !lowing instructions apply to the production of TIFF image files: + +> Processing Specifications. For each Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shall be maintained so that all changes are visible; (2) OLE Embedded files shall not be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comments shall remain or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, worksheets and other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) presenter notes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to + +the extent ESI in a foreign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be unicode-compliant. + +- b. Document Unitization. If a Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format is more than one page, the unitization of the file and any attachments or affixed notes must be maintained as it existed when collected. If unitization cannot be maintained, the original unitization must be documented in the Data Load File or otherwise electronically tracked. + +- c. Color. If a Native Format file that is converted to 77FF format contains color, the TIFF image file need not be produced in color. However, we reserve the right to make a request f 'r ale to be produced in color. + +- d. Where TIFF Image File F t practicable. In the event that production of a Native F as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you shall produc file n Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide age TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. + +- e. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Microsoft spreadsheet J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764804/EFTA02764804.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764804/EFTA02764804.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55403589ffd1be2d2170d16261b0c25019e25155 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764804/EFTA02764804.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764804.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4611, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CROSS RE-NOTICE OF TAKING Vj7I1fOTAPED DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 477.67547607421875, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 477.67547607421875, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 141.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 539.46 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764804" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e29565ec909d6c4191e6e57cb5fd6b203ecd78d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XMCG4BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., , individually, and + +Defendant(s). G + +04 + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITIO S? greed Date/Timel + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take video deposition(s) of: + +## NAME AND ADDRESS RATE AND TIME LOCATION + +William Berger February 23, 2018 Weiss Handler & Cornwell 2255 Glades Road Suite 218-A Boca Raton, FL 33431 561-997-9995 + +9:30 a.m. 1 Boca Place + +VIDEOGRAPHBR: Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +upon o tion before Palm Beach Reporting, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of Feb, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting (court reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics (videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition Page 3 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +IMM , Esquire staftefile®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 4 xis Attorneys for Bradt J. + +Kara Berard kamg Link & 1555 P West Palm , Esquire in; tbennudez@flacivillaw.com , P.A. h Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 h, FL 33409 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linIcrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 4 + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 dias aides de la cita fijada pan su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, flame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kik ed. Tanpri kontakte , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator" nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou par& nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a4bd5cff7ddea13db4f4145c0ee5b4b84c613f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807/EFTA02764807.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764807.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4743, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.19, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 111.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 111.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITIO S? greed Date/Timel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 489.0465087890625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 489.0465087890625, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS RATE AND TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 460.0487060546875, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 460.0487060546875, + 443.60302734375 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 443.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 441.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 389.23199999999997, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 389.23199999999997, + 441.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 354.3663330078125, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 354.3663330078125, + 154.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 154.99249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764807" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8114a85690cbf1fdde64f3339f9f152040d3ea06 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA04080OOOO{MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED dersigned has cancelled the following hearing at the request of counsel for Je + +DATE: February 21, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of Feb., 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail.: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +cos 4s) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3fa90119a8624b0f3f3ddd773effc64e5edf318c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812/EFTA02764812.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764812.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2941, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.0093994140625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.0093994140625, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 430.8334045410156, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 430.8334045410156, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.75848388671875, + 560.52 + ], + [ + 282.75848388671875, + 575.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 575.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764812" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b78d4a3ba4094028a74d8f494d2db12bfb3c0925 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.md @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN14/ EY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE M OPPOSITION TO DEFENDAN /COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION IN LI N WUNE FILED FEBRUARY 6.2018 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je ("Epstein"), opposes the Motion in Limine Sled by Defendant/Counter-Plainti [D.E. 1189] and states: en on February 6, 2018, + +## BACKGROUND + +In yet ano Mt in Liminc seeks to prohibit Epstein from making any logical and ' Anse comparison between the settlement amounts of three clients (L.M., E.I Jane Doe), and claimed damages in his malicious prosecution Counterc + +contends that his three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) are not named parties to and have asserted no claims in this lawsuit. (Mot. at 1;7). Despite this position here, identified L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe as witnesses in support of his Counterclaim. [D.E. 10421. Further, the parties have stipulated that Epstein settled the claims of three clients in July 2010. See Joint Pretrial Stipulation at ¶33. [D.E. 1132.] + +Finally, also has suggested that the amount(s) of his three clients' settlements are relevant to show that Epstein lacked probable cause (because cases against Epstein were not fabricated): + +> 5 [Q] So, are you telling this jury that the 6 A three clients that you represented, the settlements 7 that you obtained for them were somehow impacted 8 your inability to fulfill your professional 9 obligations as a result of this counterclaim -- t 10 lawsuit being filed against you? + +11 A No. I'm telling you that's 12 Epstein wanted to happen, but I didn't + +13 Q He failed; is that ri + +14 A Look at the nu a aid it was a 15 fabricated case. He paid mi ton Ilars for these 16 allegedly fabricated cas s a a big, fat lie 17 that he put in that co pia , hich the jury is going 18 to get to hear about + +19 Q So into as to shut you down and make 20 you not settle to somehow give them 21 away. He fa' e you, on behalf of your 22 clients, gle penny they deserved, didn't 23 you? + +24 A I did well for them. + +11/10/17 epo. :14-18).i + +Q We talked earlier about the settlement with the three clients that you represented when you were at Rothstein, and I think the number was 5.2 million — + ++2 A It was 5.5 million. It settled in July of 3 2010.... + +11/10/17 Depo. 304:23-25, 305:2-3.) + +I Excerpts of 11/10/17 deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit A. + +Thus, has placed the settlement amount(s) of clients' cases at issue and advanced its admissibility at every turn. Therefore, any comparison between the amount(s) and own alleged damages will be a fair comment on the evidence. + +# INTRODUCTION + +In Motion in Limine, requests an order precluding E making any reference in front of the jury to the following: (I) a compari settlement amounts of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe and the damages soughtCI I deems a "comparative verdict" argument); (2) that is "fore stein from een the ds (which he cnts to testify for selfish motivations; and (3) the fact that three clienS l e awarded any portion of any damages award against Epstein. + +contends that all of these remarks 8t s I ant, highly prejudicial, intentioned to mislead and confuse the jury, and that a letter Florida law. M.' Motion sh e verdict" argument is barred by blackied for the following reasons. + +First, the above remarks, Second, "comparati Third, the arguments Counterclaim an tic ege d dAtnages. at all, will be fair commentary on the evidence. ' cases are inapposite and distinguishable on their facts. ant to credibility as to his malicious prosecution + +#### A. bject Comments arelloaroper as Thev Will be Fair Commentary on the Evidence, and Relevant to Credibility. + +## ARGUMENT + +# 1. Fair Comment on the Evidence is Permissible + +"Judges have discretion to allow attorneys wide latitude in making legitimate arguments to the jury, including assertions of logical inferences." v. State, 700 So. 2d 458, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). "Merely arguing a conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence is permissible fair comment." v. State, 603 So. 2d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 1992). During closing argument, for example, it is proper "to review the evidence and to explicate those inferences which may reasonably be drawn from the evidence." Frazier v. State, 970 So. 2d 929, 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Bertolotti v. State, 476 So. 2d 130, 134 (Fla. 1985)). "It is [even] permissible for counsel to argue, based on the record, that one witness should be bylieved and another should not. " Covington v. State, 842 So. 2d 170, 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 200 + +first takes issue with Epstein arguing to the jury that " w seeks tens of millions of dollars more for his claimed `emotional distress' than collectively for all three of his clients combined." (Mot. at ¶1.) But, as a res litigation strategy, S this will be a fair comment on the evidence. ct !) EdwaA entitled his three clients as s witnesses, the parties have stipulated that Edwar , ents settled with Epstein in 2010, and has indicated he will introduce t(s) of his three clients' settlements to show that his cases against Epstein were A fab ted. In fact, has argued in Court that Epstein t filed his original civil p clients and all the acking in probable cause) because of the threat of mtiffs who now claims to have been the lead lawyer for. Thus, any nt that is seeking millions of dollars more for his purported damag an he fecovered for all three of his clients combined will be a fair comment on the evide one that may be reasonably inferred from the evidence. + +also takes issue with the comments that he, "for his own financial gain, plans to have [his three clients] testify about their intensely personal claims," and that three clients "have no interest in and will receive no benefit from the outcome of this litigation and, in fact, released their claims against Epstein in July 2010." These comments are not intended to "demonize" as he alleges, but are fair comments on the evidence, too. plans to call his three clients as witnesses, to support his burden of proof that Epstein lacked probable cause to file his lawsuit. These individuals have settled their claims with Epstein, are not parties to this suit, and thus, it is fair to say that their "forced" involvement is solely for financial gain (i.e., a damages award). This will be obvious to the jury, even if Epstein does not make the challenged remarks. + +# 2. "Comparative Verdict" Cases are Inapposite + +Contrary to assertion, a comment that recovered for his clients is not a comparative verdict argument seeks "C5 "car than he damages. A comparative verdict argument occurs in perso cases when plaintiff's counsel "suggest[s] to the jury that [his or her client] is filed to recovery of a verdict than other injured plaintiffs." Div. of Corr. v. Wyn ce, ip, . 2d 446, 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). This is not Epstein's potential fair comment o iiosvi " nce whatsoever. + +In Wynn, for example, the Firs sstriccourt of Appeal found it was improper jury argument for plaintiff's counsel two successful plaintiffs (Carol Burnett and `Miss Wyoming') who won large recent and widely publicized damage suits." Id. at 449. The First District Court al declined to reverse, however, as the error was unpreserved, and the commen to the level of fundamental error. Id. + +Wri Millworks, Inc. v. Long, 412 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), also cited by distinguishable, too. In Long, plaintiffs' counsel stated in closing that Carol Burnett had recently recovered \$1.5 million for slander; counsel then stated his clients were entitled to "[no] less than anyone else." Id. at 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). In reversing based upon this "comparative verdict" argument, the Fifth District Court of Appeal concluded there was "[no] logical connection between Carol Burnett's punitive damage award against a national + +magazine for slander and a compensatory damage award to [Long's' for his foot injury. Id. at 893-94. + +Here, in contrast to Wynn and no jury awards or verdicts are being compared. Nor is Epstein arguing that damages should be capped at \$5.5 million. (Mot. at ¶5). Rather, the statement(s) at issue will be fair commentary on the evidence, and t us, bear a "logical connection" to the facts in this case. will have the opporttdlW o present evidence of the full extent of his damages. He will not be prejudiced. + +# 3. The Comments Speak to Credibility + +As noted above, "It is . . . permissible for counsel to ac baWon the record, that one witness should be believed and another should not." i t)42 So. 2d at 172. Here, the fact that is seeking millions more in d he recovered for his three clients combined—alleged victims of sexual mol S children by Epstein—is relevant to ME credibility. + +taS? suggests that Eps ly trying to portray him in a bad light, and that this is impermissible bad characte vid . Not so. Epstein recognizes — and has attempted to prevent from s g - that in a civil case, evidence of a person's conduct is never admissible to pro at th person acted in conformity with that character trait. Here, however, Epstein is no to show is a bad guy, but to impeach MI credibility as to the exorbi unt of damages he is claiming for his alleged excessive anxiety that he has suffered every single day from December 2009 through today. + +#### CONCLUSION + +Epstein respectfully requests this Court to deny ME Motion in Liminc filed February 6, 2018. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys Service List below on February 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal p Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). ed on the o Florida + +Jack S Searcy, Ddgny, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepesearcvlaw.com jsx@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com Co-Counseraiendant/Counter-Maintiff J. + +1555 Palm Beach LaIces LINK & ROCKENBACH PC) it!: Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Flori 1 (561) 727-3600; ( 72 1 [fax] + +By:// cots Scott N 602991) Ka ockenbach (FBN 44903) M. any (FBN 26680) Scott( linkrocklaw.com ry: Karafalinkrocklaw.com " Trial Counsel for Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 niseFLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiteiendant/Counto -Plaintiff J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counselcuagendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com + +Jack A. Goldberger 250 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com smahonev@aawpa.corn Co-Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +,1OAlk + +CO + +...agia. + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLUAt, + +VIDEOTPA& SITION + +LEY + +C :Iren on Behalf of Plaintiff + +O + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard .T West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +\,'"; + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 now being served with by Mr. Epstein. + +2 • Did I interrupt you? + +3 A No. I will finish right there. + +4 • Good. I didn't want to interrupt you. + +6 7 8 9 10 So, are you telling this jury that the three clients that you represented, the settleme A that you obtained for them were somehow impa Q by your inability to fulfill your professiona obligations as a result of this counter lawsuit being filed against you? -- this + +11 12 A No. I'm telling you c what Jeffrey Epstein wanted to happen, b dn't let happen. + +13 Q He failed; is xh ght? + +14 15 16 17 18 A Look at thhuum rs. He said it was a fabricated case. id millions of dollars for these allegedly fab that he p in tTiat complaint, which the jury is going to get o h r about. It was all a big, fat lie + +19 20 21 22 23 <4;;fr, So his intent was to shut you down and make 0 .Tieg,S AL t settle the cases, or to somehow give them way. He failed, because you, on behalf of your clients, got every single penny they deserved, didn't you? + +24 A I did well for them. + +25 • You wouldn't have settled them if you 1 Q Worked at the Rothstein firm? + +2 A Yes. + +3 4 Q And did he join the firm that you guys set up, -- + +6 Q Tell me the name of the firm again. + +7 8 A Jaffe, Weissing, Lehrman. + +9 Q Did not join them? + +10 A No. + +11 12 Qe was at Q Did you work with hi Rothstein when you were emp a ere? + +13 A We were both ply there. + +14 15 Q Did you wo wi him on any of the Epste r files? + +16 17 A No. He dn't work on Epstein files. He was an IT guy. + +18 + +19 20 ric\Ilunderstand. Did you use him for any part of the %Can cases? + +21 22 A I don't think he worked on any -- we didn't have any IT needs, I don't believe. + +23 24 25 Q We talked earlier about the settlement with the three clients that you represented when you were at Rothstein, and I think the number was + +A No. + +AL.\slr, + +CO' Fit + +1 5.2 million -- + +2 3 A It was 5.5 million. It settled in July of 2010, not while I was at Rothstein. + +4 6 Q No, I understand. They were the three same three clients you represented while you were at 4A r Rothstein's, right? + +7 A Yes. + +8 9 Alt Q Can you tell me, of the 5.5, how CI' id the three collectively collect from tha + +10 A I don't remember that. + +11 12 Q You didn't take thos on a pro bono basis, did you? :Y l + +13 14 15 A No. It was a g ency arrangement, similar to my arrang nt ith Mr. Scarola in this case. 11 ,741 + +16 Q Oka nderstand. I understand. + +17 18 perce o tha contingency, do you remember what e contingency was? + +19 I don't. + +20 Was it a third, 40 percent? + +21 22 23 24 25 A Probably -- I don't know. But the standard is between zero and a million, 40 percent if it's in litigation; 1 to \$2 million, 30 percent; and then over \$2 million, 20 percent or something. There's a sliding scale. That's probably what was used. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8e63f7c00685f8311d38fff05ffe7f9231921d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816/EFTA02764816.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,739 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764816.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 14696, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN14/ EY EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE M OPPOSITION TO DEFENDAN /COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION IN LI\nN\nWUNE FILED FEBRUARY 6.2018", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 503.5899963378906, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 503.5899963378906, + 392.60302734375 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 392.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.8329162597656, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.8329162597656, + 491.60302734375 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 491.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.55560302734375, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 356.55560302734375, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. \nbject Comments arelloaroper as Thev Will be Fair Commentary on the \nEvidence, and Relevant to Credibility.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 543.4418334960938, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 543.4418334960938, + 596.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 596.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 555.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 555.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Fair Comment on the Evidence is Permissible", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 380.2813415527344, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 380.2813415527344, + 624.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 624.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. \"Comparative Verdict\" Cases are Inapposite", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 430.3491516113281, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 430.3491516113281, + 224.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 224.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. The Comments Speak to Credibility", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 384.9542236328125, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 384.9542236328125, + 280.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 280.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764816" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f2a9a05acededc094b4a199a0a263506a184bc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. 4. 48k + +PlaintifYCounter-Defendant, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND DEPOSITION DESI A9 rI 9 EPSTEIN'S + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep reby designates the following entire deposition transcripts: + +- 1. May 6, 2010, Depos Circuit, Palm Beach County C \* cript of E.W., E.W. v.Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial 2008-CA-028056-XXXXMB-AD. +- 2. Septembe 30, 2004, Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893-Civtember 24, 2009, Deposition Transcript of L.M., L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 156 Judicial it, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXXMB-AB. +- 4. February 9, 2010, Deposition Transcript of L.M., L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXXMB-AB. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 21, 2018, through the Court’s e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: T [REDACTED] +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolatcam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c3c3f3eb85353aa44c94fa123f50feff41c6577 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829/EFTA02764829.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764829.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5620, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.09, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nDEPOSITION DESI \nA9 rI\n9 \nEPSTEIN'S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 322.4609375 + ], + [ + 470.93218994140625, + 322.4609375 + ], + [ + 470.93218994140625, + 357.67822265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 357.67822265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764829" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f67b22134bb5804d16edde2bd3e99abc6a485399 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT' ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AC.SA ) NOTICE OF UMC HEARING + +\*S' PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated bolo the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County C9t4EIt e, 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom RID, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: PI tiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Audio Re g + +DATE: ( S Monday, , March 5, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +# LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on February 21, 2018, through the Co Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). the attorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida + ++6s + +O S + +LINK i a ACH, PA 155 l% B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 1 each, Florida 33401 [1) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +rk /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeapi ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c tniento parne poder participar en este procedimiento, usted Ilene de hol tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama ilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highways West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 1 fijada para su comparecencia en los tribun mediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo an,Si comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si ust e iscapacitacion del oido o de to voz, llame al 711." e\ dias antes de la cita + +"Si ou se yon moun ki en pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou final Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d686c9d84bef904193cc8eb318d1a0a11e10523 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832/EFTA02764832.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764832.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8030, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 111.603515625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 111.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AC.SA )\nNOTICE OF UMC HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.9380798339844 + ], + [ + 394.606201171875, + 328.9380798339844 + ], + [ + 394.606201171875, + 356.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764832" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3faa805d432477b5d1ac2bfd5fe31d64f8770e1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.md @@ -0,0 +1,716 @@ +J. and L.M., individually, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants, + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +#### DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. EDWARDS, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms for trial in the above-styled matter. + +filed his initia Pro ed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form on November 9, 2017. On November 13, filed his First Supplement to that pleading, which added a proposed Instruction regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404. On 30, 2017, filed his Second Supplement, which added proposed jury in regarding probable cause (based upon the authority of Liabos v. Hannan. 215 So. 2d 487, r489-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)) and a proposed jury instruction based upon the ancient law of natural and probable consequences of one's actions. Finally, on February 16, 2018, filed his Third Supplement concerning a fact that has been stipulated to by Epstein's counsel. + +These Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form incorporate the three Supplements and also contain revisions to proposed jury instruction 201.1 + +(Description of the Case) based on the Court's recent rulings as to the admissibility of various evidence at trial. [REDACTED] has also included his Verdict Form, which was inadvertently left off the initial filing. + +In addition, [REDACTED] has added a proposed jury instruction regarding the clear and convincing evidence standard and Florida and United States Supreme Court law concerning uncertain or difficult to determine damages. Finally, [REDACTED] has slightly modified his Compensatory Damage jury instruction to remove certain categories of damages. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 21At day of February, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 53 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS + +### **201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE** + +Welcome. The Clerk will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a disagreement between people or companies [or others, as appropriate], where the claims of one or more of these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +*This case concerns the following. Beginning in the summer of 2008, [REDACTED] represented three underage females, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who had been sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein. At the same time, dozens of other alleged victims were identified as having been sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein, and many of those underage children retained lawyers in order to file civil claims against Epstein. Attorney [REDACTED], in coordination with those other attorneys, took a leading role in coordinated discovery efforts in those sexual abuse lawsuits.* + +*Also in the summer of 2008, Attorney [REDACTED] was lead counsel in a separate lawsuit against the federal government, which sought to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement that Epstein had entered into with the federal government. Under the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein was only required to serve a 13 months sentence in exchange for pleading guilty to two state felony charges concerning his alleged molestation of children.* + +*In April of 2009, Attorney [REDACTED] took a job at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler law firm. Approximately six months later, while Attorney [REDACTED] was prosecuting his clients' sexual abuse claims against Epstein and pursuing the separate federal action to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm, Scott Rothstein, had secretly been engaged in a massive Ponzi scheme since 2005. While Rothstein's Ponzi scheme began years before Attorney [REDACTED] sued Epstein and years before Attorney [REDACTED] was employed by Rothstein's law firm, after [REDACTED] joined the firm, Rothstein used the claims against Epstein to attract additional Ponzi scheme investors. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millions of dollars from 2005 to 2009 and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. The fact that Rothstein used the pending claims against Epstein to attract investors in the Ponzi scheme is not disputed. Epstein sued [REDACTED] for knowingly assisting Rothstein in the Ponzi scheme. Whether Epstein had a reasonable basis to support that claim is an issue for you to decide in this case.* + +*Rothstein's scheme was disclosed by the media in November of 2009, and on December 1, 2009 Rothstein was indicted by the federal government. [REDACTED] name was never associated with Rothstein's criminal scheme and he was not indicted. Nonetheless, six days later, Jeffrey Epstein sued Rothstein, [REDACTED], and L.M., one of Epstein's victims. At* + +the time Epstein filed this lawsuit, he had already settled thirteen sexual molestation claims brought by other underage females, and he faced more than two dozen pending sexual molestation claims, including those being pursued by Mr. [REDACTED] on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Mr. [REDACTED] also continued to pursue the federal action to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement. + +In his lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein alleged that Mr. [REDACTED] prosecuted fabricated and exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits on behalf of Mr. [REDACTED] three underage clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, these claims were "weak" and had "minimal value," and the real reason Mr. [REDACTED] pursued those false sexual molestation claims on behalf of these underage children was to knowingly assist in a criminal scheme to defraud investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars by committing a series of felonies in cooperation with convicted Ponzi schemer, Scott Rothstein. In the lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein also sought, in part, to stop all of the lawsuits that had been filed by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, the three underage females represented by Edwards regarding the sexual molestation committed upon them by Epstein. + +Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein knew these allegations were false at the time he filed the lawsuit in 2009, and that Jeffrey Epstein continued to prosecute these knowingly false allegations for years. + +This case therefore concerns whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to file and continue that lawsuit against Attorney Bradley [REDACTED], alleging that Mr. [REDACTED] had prosecuted fabricated and exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits filed by [REDACTED] on behalf of three underage female children, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who he alleged were repeatedly sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein over a period of years. According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, these claims were "weak" and had "minimal value, and the real reason Mr. [REDACTED] pursued the sexual molestation claims on behalf of these underage children was to knowingly assist in a criminal scheme to defraud investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars by committing a series of felonies in cooperation with convicted Ponzi schemer, Scott Rothstein. + +Bradley Edwards contends that the lawsuits he prosecuted on behalf of his 3 clients were well-founded. Although Jeffrey Epstein sued [REDACTED] based, in part, on the allegation that the lawsuits were not well-founded, he has recently conceded that all of the lawsuits Attorney [REDACTED] filed on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe were filed and pursued by [REDACTED] Edwards in good-faith + +Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed the lawsuit against Attorney [REDACTED] in order to intimidate Mr. [REDACTED] into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims, and to intimidate the dozens of other victims who were pursuing claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this suit out of hatred for Mr. [REDACTED], who was coordinating much of the discovery being taken by all of the alleged underage victims, not just L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Finally, Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this lawsuit to punish Attorney Edward for a lawsuit Attorney [REDACTED] had filed against the federal government, in which Attorney [REDACTED], on behalf of his clients, sought to overturn the plea agreement Jeffrey Epstein had entered into with the federal government concerning his sexual molestation of children. + +Attorney defended against Epstein's lawsuit, challenging it on the grounds that sitlegal or factual support. Shortly before the Court was scheduled to rule on Mr. challenge, Epstein dismissed all of his claims against Attorney . Furthermore, Epstein allowed the statute of limitations to expire making it legally impossible for Epstein to bring any claims IS the conduct he sued upon in the original complaint. Yet while Epstein denies claim for malicious prosecution, he has refused to nswer an uestions about the civil claims he says were fabricated or about the basis for cl knowingly participated in a massive fraud. + +Finally, although Epstein claimed that the cases being pursued by L. •nd Jane Doe were "weak" and had "minimal value", Epstein eventually sett! i ims brought by for a total of \$5.5 million. + +The principal witnesses who will testify in this r 0 BE COVERED DURING VOIR DIRE]. N + +( S" + +ricS '714r Nis) + +# 201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and decide how to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that you will need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on the issues of th' la + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plaintiff A party that is called the 0 Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of representing their ch that is, they speak for their clients here at the trial. They have taken oaths as atto their best and to follow the rules of their profession. + +Plaintiffs Counsel: The attorney on this e the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents and is the person who r e 6laim in dispute. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. Mr. S ila 1 s client will be referred to most of the time as "the plaintiff. Mr. Scarola, will introduce who is sitting at the table with you? + +Defendant's Coun The attorney on this side of the courtroom, Scott Link, represents Jeffrey Epstein, the S 6wh as been sued. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. He and his el' 'll ually be referred to here as "the defendant". Mr. Link, will you please introdu 's ting at the table with you? + +Co Clerk: This person sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. He/She is here to assist me with some of the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that are introduced in the course of the trial. + +Court Reporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. His/Her job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. His/Her job is to mains n order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. An g y need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should ht to him/her. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the . On can do that. + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begi ect in a few moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what t a and what the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point o fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial es that all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case o n the'evidence presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyon g friends and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on h decide this case. + +I want to s r that , this rule means you must not use electronic devices or computers nicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting 1 rmation on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, maps, or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom. + +IYou cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may of use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or mt ate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not raphs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow j ors. e end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate wit e outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the eceive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone num tl provided to you. + +What are the reasons for these rul rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction a ly o the evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or s on your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make su th the information you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no unity to dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary q6 r judicial system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and the evidence being considered against it and to present argument with respect t t a evidence. Any independent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings. and a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start over. A mistrial is a tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the taxpayers. If you violate + +Alternative B Instruction + +these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, such as serving time in jail, paying a fine or both. + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, or me, will be pail of the record of these proceedings. That means those communications shall either be made in open urt with the court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing will be filed with gco m lerk. I have instructed the courtroom personnel that any communications you hay t outside of my presence must be reported to me, and I will tell the parties and the attotlt rs about any communication from you that I believe may be of interest to th s and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate directly wt concerning your comfort and safety, such as juror to assemble for duty, dress, what personal ite? S can e personnel about matters lion of break areas, how and when rought into the courthouse or jury room. + +of t ese instructions or any other instruction I give to the bailiff. If you become aware of any ;go in this case, you must tell me by gi + +#### 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS + +The last thing I want to do, before we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +Questions/Challenges: This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportunity to get to know a little bit about you, in order to help them con t their own conclusions about your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide whi think should 0 be the jurors in this case. + +How we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some al questions of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific quest hey will ask of you. After they have asked all of their questions, I will meet it m and they will tell me their choices for jurors. Each side can ask that I ex person from serving on a jury if they can give me a reason to believe that he or s e \* ht be unable to be fair and impartial. That is what is called a challenge for cause ers also have a certain number of what are called peremptory challenges, by whi t e ay exclude a person from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of liminatton, the remaining persons are selected as the jury. It may take more than one conference ong the parties, their attorneys, and me before the final selections are made. Q + +uestionin The questions that you will be asked during this process are not intended to barrass you or unnecessarily pry into your personal affairs, but it is important that the parties and their attorneys know enough about you to make this important decision. If a question is asked that you would prefer not to answer in front of the whole courtroom, just let me know and you can come up here and give your answer just in front of the attorneys and me. If you have a question of either the attorneys or me, don't hesitate to let me know. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 12 of 53 + +that will be asked of you. The only thing that I ask is that you answer the questions as frankly and as honestly and as completely as you can. You will take an oath to answer all questions truthfully and completely and you must do so. Remaining silent when you have information you should disclose is a violation of that oath as well. If a juror violates this oath 4 it ",0not only may result in having to try the case all over again but also can result in c. . an riminal penalties against a juror personally. So, again, it is very important that s honest and complete with your answers as you possibly can. If you don't and Stan e question, please raise your hand and ask for an explanation or clarification. + +In sum, this is a process to assist the parties r ttomeys to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you a purpose. If, for any reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror ou tell us. + +# 202.1 INTRODUCTION + +You have now taken an oath to serve as jurors in this trial. Before we begin, I am going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to this case and let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +It is my intention to give you some of the rules of law but it might hat will not know for sure all of the law that will apply in this case until all of the is presented. However, I can anticipate most of the law and give it to you at t beginning of the trial so that you will better understand what to be looking for while t ence is presented. If I later decide that different or additional law applies to the c tell you. In any event, at the end of the evidence I will give you the final instrt> s which you must base your verdict. At that time, you will have a complete wn the instructions so you do not have to memorize what I am about to tell you. + +The following are the rul w xpected to apply in this case. + +[READ RELEVPOpIytNSTRUCTIONS BEGINNING AT PG. 28] + +# 202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a ch A e to I make what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is all d t \*ye you his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you a < see and hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening state e plaintiffs will bring their witnesses and evidence to you. + +Evidence: Evidence is the information that a v 11ows you to see or hear in deciding this case. Evidence includes the testimony o A w sses, documents, and anything else that I instruct you to consider. + +Witnesses: A witness is n jvho takes an oath to tell the truth and then answers attorneys' questions for the jur t answering of attorneys' questions by witnesses is called "giving testimony." Testifo Means statements that are made when someone has sworn an oath to tell the t + +The.4pQ lawyer will normally question the witness first. That is called direct examin:fttrIlen the defense lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever the witness has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other evidence may also be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the plaintiffs' witnesses have testified, the defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses on the stand and go through the same process. Then the plaintiffs' lawyer gets to do crossexamination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that you remember that testimony come from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimony and they are not themselves witnesses. + +Objections: Sometimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a question is asked of a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may m e what is called an "objection." The rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are for the attorneys to object. You should simply wait for me to decide how to pr say that an objection is "sustained", that means the witness may not answer th questl If I say that the objection is "overruled", that means the witness may answer th o + +When there is an objection and I make a deci yy must not assume from that decision that I have any particular opinion other e rules for conducting a trial are being correctly followed. If I say a question y asked or answered, you must not try to guess what the answer would have been. is against the rules, too. + +Side Bar Conferences: S elements of the case that are no priate for the jury to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few of these confe as possible while you are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if have to have such a conference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference of my desk so that we do not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroo m. will need to speak to the attorneys about legal + +Recesses: Breaks in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses". During a recess you still have your duties as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been presented to you, I will instruct you on the law that you must follow. It is important that you remember these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which come next, and + +later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence to reach your decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the opportunity to make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing arguments, I will ink ct further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you must follow to deci + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury instructions, you Il go, . he jury room and discuss and decide the questions I have put on your verdict jury instructions to use during your discussions. The disc make are usually called "jury deliberations." Your I nor anyone else will be with you in the jury ou will have a copy of the u have and the decisions you s are absolutely private and neither + +Verdict: When you have finish to the bailiff, and we will all ret is completed, you will be release g the questions, you will give the verdict form m, where your verdict will be read. When that your assignment as a jury. + +Finally, before /pie brief explanation of rules you iiM pe we he trial, I want to give you just a must follow as the roceeds. + +Kee i an 0 en Mind: You must pay close attention to the testimony and other evidence it comes into the trial. However, you must avoid forming any final opinion or telling anyone else your views on the case until you begin your deliberations. This rule requires you to keep an open mind until you have heard all of the evidence and is designed to prevent you from influencing how your fellow jurors think until they have heard all of the evidence and had an opportunity to form their own opinions. The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, + +and I have instructed you on the law. It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything. + +Consider Only the Evidence: It is the things you hear and see in this courtroom that matter in this trial. The law tells us that a juror can consider only the testimony a other evidence that all the other jurors have also heard and seen in the presence o ju and the lawyers. Doing anything else is wrong and is against the law. That it Th t t you must not do any work or investigation of your own about the case. You obtain on your own any information about the case or about anyone involv V 1 e case, from any source whatsoever. This includes reading newspapers, watchi phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any related to this case or the people and places are in the courthouse, at home, or any trial or use the intemet to look a i on or using a computer, cell ns at all, to get information in this case. This applies whether you else. You must not visit places mentioned in the pictures to see any place discussed during trial. + +Do not provide any info members. Do not let anyo about this case to anyone, including friends or family uding the closest family members, make comments to you or ask questions abo trial. Jurors must not have discussions of any sort with friends or family members ase or the people and places involved. So, do not let even the closest family members ake comments to you or ask questions about the trial. In this age of electronic communication, I want to stress again that just as you must not talk about this case face-to-face, you must not talk about this case by using an electronic device. You must not use phones, tablets, computers or other electronic devices to communicate. Do not send or accept any messages related to this case or your jury service. Do not discuss this case or ask for advice by any means at all, including posting information on an Internet website, chat room or blog. + +No Mid-Trial Discussions: When we are in a recess, do not discuss anything about the trial or the case with each other or with anyone else. If attorneys approach you, don't speak with them. The law says they are to avoid contact with you. If an attorney will not look at you or speak to you, do not be offended or form a conclusion about that behavior. The att ey is not supposed\_to interact with jurors outside of the courtroom and is only followi The attorney is not being impolite. If an attorney or anyone else does try to s, 11% you or says something about the case in your presence, please inform the bailiff i + +Only the Jury Decides: Only you get to deliberate a cwer the verdict questions at the end of the trial. I will not intrude into your delibera n . I am required to be neutral. ) You should not assume that I prefer one decisio other. You should not try to guess what my opinion is about any part of the e. uld be wrong for you to conclude that anything I say or do means that I an one side or another in the trial. Discussing and deciding the facts is your job alo c .) + +r ic S tily + +psi + +you when we reconvene. After you have completed your deliberat your notes to me. They will be destroyed. No one will ever notes. You will be provided with a note pad and a pen for use if you wish to take note. Any notes that you take will be for your personal use. However, you should not take them Air?ffif l from the courtroom. During recesses, the bailiff will take possession of your notes eturn them to ailiff will deliver + +If you take notes, do not get so involved in noteproceedings. Your notes should be used only as aid lict ou become distracted from the emory. + +Whether or not you take notes, you s should not be unduly influenced by the weight than each juror's memory o nce. n your memory of the evidence and you er jurors. Notes are not entitled to any greater + +# 202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS + +If you would like to take notes during the trial, you may do so. On the other hand, of course, you are not required to take notes if you do not want to. That will be left up to you individually. + +### 202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS + +#### Questions for the court or courtroom personnel: + +During the trial, you may have a question about these proceedings. If so, please write it down and hand it to the bailiff, who will then hand it to me. I will review your ques 'on with the parties, and their attorneys, before responding. + +# Questions for witnesses: + +You also may have a question you think should be a witness. If so, there is a way for you to request that I ask the witness a question e attorneys have completed their questioning of the witness, you should raise if you have a question. I will then give you sufficient time to write the questi n ece of paper, fold it, and give it to the bailiff, who will pass it to me. Do no you name on the question, show it to anyone or discuss it with anyone. + +I will then review the q stio with the attorneys. Under our law, only certain evidence may be considered by a determining a verdict. You are bound by the same rules of evidence that cort r the attorneys' questions. If I decide that the question may not be asked under our idence, I will tell you. Otherwise, I will direct the question to the witness. The alto ys ay then ask follow-up questions if they wish. If there are additional questions from jurors, we will follow the same procedure again. + +By providing this procedure, I do not mean to suggest that you must or should submit written questions for witnesses. In most cases, the lawyers will have asked the necessary questions. + +# 301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED TESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS + +# a. Deposition or prior testimony: + +Members of the jury, the sworn testimony of (name), given before trial, 11 now be presented. You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any once in the case. + +# 0 b. interrogatories: + +Members of the jury, answers to interrogatories will no c ) o you. Interrogatories are written questions that have been presented before tw( ' ) party to another. They are answered under oath. You are to consider and wei S e %t stions and answers as you would any other evidence in the case. + +( S H\ + +# c. Stipulated testimony: + +Members of the jury, the p agreed that if (name of witness) were called as a witness, he/she would testify (r escribe the testimony). You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would an evidence in the case. + +# d. Stipulations. + +Mem of e jury, the parties have agreed to certain facts. You must accept these facts as true. agreed facts). + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded that had a good-faith basis to file all of the civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. By conceding that all of the lawsuits were filed in good-faith, Jeffrey Epstein has not conceded that he in fact committed lige alleged acts against LM., E.W. and Jane Doe, only that had good-faith basis to reasonably believe that Jeffrey Epstein had in fact committed the alleged acts. As to whether in fact he committed the alleged acts, Jeffrey Epstein has asserted the right to remain silent. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 22 of 53 + +#### e. Admissions: + +### 1. Applicable to all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts.) You must accept these facts as true. (Read the admissions). + +# 2. Applicable to fewer than all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the' ). You must accept these facts as true in deciding the issues between (identify the a es), but these facts should not be used in deciding the issues between (identify the un ffeet)ed parties). (Read the admissions). + +iS )49 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 23 of 53 + +## 301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received in evidence. Witnesses may testify about or refer to this or any other item of evidence during the remainder of the trial. This and all other items received in evidence will be available to you for examination uring your deliberations at the end of the trial. + +CO + +# 301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS + +The (describe item of evidence) has been received in evidence. It is being shown to you now to help you understand the testimony of this witness and other witnesses in the case, as well as the evidence as a whole. You may examine (describe item of evidence) briefly no . It will also + +be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the t ' Co + +# 301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS + +### a. Generally: + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. The testimony of the witness is evidence; how ver, these (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence received in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. evidence will be available to you for consideration during your delibe tions unless received in + +# b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids bas i ted assumptions: + +This witness will be using (identify de aids) to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. These items hav pared to assist this witness in explaining his/her testimony. They may be based testimony of the witness is evide not to be considered as eviden as a substitute for eviden Ens which you are free to accept or reject. The er, these (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are case unless received in evidence, and should not be used y items received in evidence will be available to you for consideration duri ur deliberations. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 26 of 53 + +### **301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE** + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received into evidence. It has been admitted only for the purpose of (describe purpose) as to (name party). You may consider it only for that purpose as it might affect (name party). You may not consider that evidence for any other purpose as to any other party. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### **406.1 INTRODUCTION** + +Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the evidence in this case. I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that you must use in reaching your verdict. You will recall at the beginning of the case I told you that if, at the end of the case I decided that different law applies, I would tell you so. These instructions are (slightly) different from what I gave you at the beginning and it is these rules of law that you must now follow. When I finish telling you about the rules of law, the attorneys will present their final arguments and you will then retire to decide your verdict. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### 406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS + +The claims in this case for your consideration are as follows: + +claims that Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause filed and continued to prosecute a lawsuit against Mr. . That lawsuit allepged that Mr. fabricated sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behal thr clients. According to the lawsuit Jeffrey Epstein filed against Mr. M s pursued the fabricated claims as part of Mr. knowing participation in ill, I Ponzi scheme with Scott Rothstein. Mr. claims that he was damaged b se and malicious claims that Mr. Epstein filed against him. + +Jeffrey Epstein denies that claim. + +The parties must prove all claims a s by the greater weight of the evidence. I j will now define some of the terms you ay?'n deciding this case. + +C, ) + +ricS tv ....) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 29 of 53 + +### **406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE** + +"Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting and continuing the civil proceeding against the facts and circumstances known to Jeffrey Epstein were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the claims made by Jeffrey Epstein ag nst were supported by existing facts. + +In order for probable cause to exist on the part of Jeffrey Epstein, t own to Jeffrey Epstein must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the fil civil lawsuit. Where, however, it would appear to a cautious man that further inv .n is justified before filing a civil lawsuit, then the failure to perform that additi igation may form the basis to conclude that such person lacked probable cause tp the vil lawsuit. + +Authority: Liabos v. Harman, 215 So. 9-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) + +# 406.5 MALICE + +One acts maliciously in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to establis at he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Eps Acz• oac maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the including any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the pr t mplained of, + +4 49 + +&#x27;Durkin v. , 814 So. 2d 1246. 1248-49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("As to malice on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff need not allege actual malice; legal malice is sufficient and may be inferred from, among other things, a lack of probable cause, gross negligence, or great + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 32 of 53 + +# 406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING + +One is regarded as having instituted or continued a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted or continued. + +S SA + +indifference to persons, property, or the rights of others. Here, the allegations supporting a lack of probable cause are evidence from which a jury could infer malice.") (emphasis added) + +occurred. The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury, or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes bstantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage, so that it can reasonably be said at, t for the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding, the loss, injury, or O uld not have + +### b. Concurring cause: + +### 406.7 LEGAL CAUSE + +#### a. Legal cause generally: + +In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, damage the malicious institution or continuation of such a proceeding need not g only cause. The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding may be a le l use of loss, injury, or damage even though it operates in combination with the act or some other cause if the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding co rt ut bstantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage. + +# c. Intervening cause: + +The titution or continuation of a proceeding may also be a legal cause of loss, inju age even though it operates in combination with the act of another or some other caus curring after the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding occurs if such other cause was itself reasonably foreseeable and the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage or the resulting loss, injury, or damage was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding and the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing it. + +# 406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM + +The issues you must decide on claim against Jeffrey Epstein are whether Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause instituted or continued a civil proceeding against which later terminated in favor of Brad y and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of loss, injury, or age + +CO + +# 406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM + +If the greater weight of the evidence does not support M' claim, your verdict should be for Jeffrey Epstein. + +However, if the greater weight of the evidence supports M' claim, then your + +COSA verdict should be for and against Jeffrey Epstein. + +# 406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately Ali ompensate se for such loss, injury, or damage as the greater weigh t vidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceedin ed of. + +M, you shall consider the followi g ele ents of If you find for damage: + +#### 4 C a. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, #gp,gu ish, hurt feelings: + +# COMPENSATORY DAMAGES + +Any injury to reputation and any sh experienced in the past or to be experie compensation to be awarded on accq and just in the light of the evidence iliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings ture. There is no exact standard for fixing the elements of damage. Any award should be fair + +# b. Loss of Capacity for the ment of Life. + +Any loss of cap for the enjoyment of life experienced in the past or to be experienced in the ure. ere is no exact standard for measuring such damage. The amount should be fair and ' the light of the evidence. + +#### c. n lost time shown: + +lawsuit. nable value of any time lost in the past in defending against Jeffrey Epstein's + +### AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE + +In order to recover damages for a particular type of loss or harm, must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that such loss or harm was caused by Jeffrey Epstein's wrongful conduct. If Edward oyes the occurrence of such loss or harm by the greater weight of the nce, is entitled to recover for that loss or harm even though act amount of that loss or harm cannot be determined. + +Thus, if you find by the greater weight of the that a particular type of loss or harm did occur as a result of Jeffrey s wrongful conduct, is entitled to recover for tha or harm as long as there is some reasonable yardstick by which it can b ured — that is, as long was there is some reasonable basis for estimatin roximating the amount of the loss or harm. may not damages merely because the amount of loss or harm is uncertain or ficult to determine. Any risk of uncertainty concerning the computation of s instead borne by Jeffrey Epstein. + +Autho ervice , 389 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); vfusd Interstate Dev. Corp. 352 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); John Hancock fe Ins. Co. v. Mark-A. Inc., 324 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Coro. 310 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Asarow-Kilgore co. v. Mulford Hickerson Corp., 301 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1974); Saporito v. Bone, 195 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hollywood Golf Estates, 324 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. Fla. 1965); McCall v. Sherbill, 68 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1953); Twyman v. Roell 123 Fla. 2, 166 So. 215 (1936); Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co 282 U.S. 555, 563 (1931). + +Masleniak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1918, 1929 (2017) citing Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., 327 U.S. 251, 265 (1946) ("The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require that the wrongdoer shall bear the risk of the uncertainty which his own wrong has created")). + +### **503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES — BIFURCATED PROCEDURE3** + +*a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:* + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for [REDACTED] and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +The trial of the punitive damages issue is divided into two parts. In this first part, you will decide whether the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein is such that punitive damages are warranted. If you decide that punitive damages are warranted, we will proceed to the second part of that issue during which the parties may present additional evidence and argument on the issue of punitive damages. I will then give you additional instructions, after which you will decide whether, in your discretion, punitive damages will be assessed and, if so, the amount. + +*b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:* + +[REDACTED] claims that punitive damages should be awarded against Jeffrey Epstein for his conduct in filing a lawsuit against Bradley Edwards without probable cause to support the allegations of wrongdoing by [REDACTED] Edwards, and with no intention to meet his own obligation to provide relevant and material discovery in support of this lawsuit. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] claims that Jeffrey Epstein's purpose for filing this lawsuit was instead to attempt to intimidate both [REDACTED] and his clients and others into abandoning their legitimate sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convincing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which was a substantial cause of loss, injury, or damage to [REDACTED]. Under those circumstances you may, in your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convincing evidence does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted against Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Epstein had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and there was a high probability of injury or damage to [REDACTED] and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that Jeffrey Epstein's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" differs from the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it is more compelling and persuasive. As I have already instructed you, "greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. *Punitive damages:* + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for [REDACTED] and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +3 Instructions 503.1b(1)-b(4) are designed for use in most common-law tort cases. However, certain types of intentional torts may require a punitive damage charge appropriate to the particular tort. See, e.g., First Interstate Development Corp. v. Ablanedo, 511 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1987); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. McCarson, 467 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1985). The same may be true when punitive damages are authorized by statute. See, e.g., Home Insurance Co. v. [REDACTED], 573 So.2d 343, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). + +#### c Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure: + +#### c(1). Opening instruction, second stage: + +Members of the jury, I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to determining whether punitive damages should be assessed and, if so, in what amount. When I finish with these instructions, the parties will present additional evidence. You should consider this additional evidence along with the evidence already presented, and you should decide any disputed factual issues by the ter weight of the evidence. "Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +# c(2,). Punitive damages — determination of amount: + +You are to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, t ed as punishment against Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount ul be in addition to the compensatory damages you have previously awarded. In ng is determination, you should consider the following: + +(A). the nature, extent and degree of misconduct afj heft fated circumstances, including the following: + +- i. whether the wrongful conduc ated solely by unreasonable financial gain; +- ii. whether the unreason high likelihood of injury resul Epstein; +- iii. whether, at harm speci , an rous nature of the conduct, together with the the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey s, injury, or damage, Jeffrey Epstein had a and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein did in fact + +(B). The fins ial revuts of Jeffrey Epstein. + +Howev y not award an amount that would financially destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +ay in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 40 of 53 + +#### d. Closing instruction, second stage: + +damages. Your verdict on the issues raised by the punitive damages claim of Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the eviden n th against Jeffrey Epstein must be based on the evidence that has been received during the trial of the first phase of this case and on the evidence that has been received in these proceedings and the law on which I have instructed you. In reaching your verdict, you are not to be swayed from the performance of your duty by prejudice or sympathy for or against any party. + +Your verdict must be unanimous, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each ofA You will be given a form of verdict, which I shall now read to you: + +When you have agreed on your verdict, the or forewoman, ' and sign the verdict. You may now retire to consider your verdict. jury, should date + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 41 of 53 + +#### **405.4 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE** + +“Clear and convincing evidence” differs from the “greater weight of the evidence” in that it is more compelling and persuasive. “Clear and convincing evidence” is evidence that is precise, explicit, lacking in confusion, and of such weight that it produces a firm belief or conviction, without hesitation, about the matter in issue. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your answers will be. Your agreed-upon answers to my questions are called your jury verdict. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of the s, all exhibits received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to by s s and any fact of which the court instructs you to accept. + +In reaching your verdict, you must think about gh the testimony and any documents, photographs, or other material that has ved in evidence. You may also consider any facts that were admitted or agre the lawyers. Your job is to determine what the facts are. You may use reason a moron sense to reach conclusions. You may draw reasonable inferences from t en e. But you should not guess about things that were not covered here. And, y ways apply the law as I have explained it to you. + +### 601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES + +Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of th itness; the intelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outco As i otf t means and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which t ability of the witness to remember the matters about which th reasonableness of the testimony of the witness, considere the case and in the light of your own experience and c case; the s testified; the ess testified; and the light of all the evidence in nse. + +You have heard opinion testimony on ce expert witnesses. subjects from persons referred to as + +You may accept such opinion deserves, considering the knowledg reasons given by the witness fo mony, reject it, or give it the weight you think it experience, training, or education of the witness, the pinion expressed, and all the other evidence in the case. + +ricS + +### ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the right to remain silent. However, the protection that applies i a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit, particularly when that lawsui as un by a person who then refuses to answer questions about the lawsuit. + +Jurors may draw reasonable conclusions that the refusal to p vide nswers or to produce other information relating to a civil lawsuit based on a refus criminate oneself is because those answers or that information would in fact be inc and otherwise harmful to the person refusing to provide the answers and inform + +Simply put, if a party in a civil lawsu to answer questions on the grounds that the answers may tend to incriminate him, may conclude that he is refusing to answer because, in fact, the answer would be incrimin him. d you may consider the refusal as evidence against + +# FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404 + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestation, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +As a consequence of these provisions in both federal and state 1 Ac il ,per pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epst • t limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Je y ein against the three clients represented by . The law express Mr. to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexua u r child molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +#### NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded and does not dispute that he filed the Complaint at issue against LM, Scott Rothstein, and prosecute claims against until he voluntarily dismissed those claims on August 16, 2012. on December 7, 2009, and he continued to + +In determining what Jeffrey Epstein's intention was at the time he prosecuted claims against the law presumes that he intended he n ~tural and probable consequences of his acts. Accordingly, if you find that Jeffrey filed and prosecuted false claims against then he is presumed to h d to file and prosecute false claims, unless that presumption is rebutted by other oCcd + +?S \ + +r + +C + +— + +A S I PIIIr + +'..) + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 47 of 53 + +# 601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT) + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attorneys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +Co SHA iS)49 + +#### SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have mast instructions for you. + +During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case and only when all jurors arc present in the jury room. You will have in t room all of the evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching y r .n, do not do any research on your own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, t, or any other reference materials. Do not investigate the case or conduefjpn periments. Do not visit or view the scene of any event involved in this case o 0o maps or pictures on the Internet. If you happen to pass by the scene, do not i vestigatc. All jurors must see or hear the same evidence at the same time. Do of <9ltisten to, or watch any news accounts of this trial. St one another + +You are not to c c unicate with any person outside the jury about this case. Until you have reached a ver 'et, you l ust not talk about this case in person or through the telephone, writing, or el c mmunication, such as a blog, twitter, e-mail, text message, or any other means. c ntact anyone to assist you, such as a family accountant, doctor, or lawyer. These com unications rules apply until I discharge you at the end of the case. + +If you become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by giving a note to the bailiff. + +Any notes you have taken during the trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes are simply an aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are binding or conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own + +memory or that of other jurors. Instead, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the conclusion of the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. No one will ever read your notes. + +In reaching your verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public o • 'on, any other sentiment for or against any party to influence your decision. Your • t ust be based on the evidence that has been received and the law on which I have e• you. + +Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot p tc to in that decision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdict from something I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer o over another. Therefore, in reaching your verdict, you should not consi loiSan r, ng that I have said or done, except for my specific instructions to you. + +.), v-- Pay careful attention to a nstructions that I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a c f my instructions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the inst s are important, and you must consider all of them together. There are no other 1>lrys that apply to this case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must + in reaching your decision in this case. + +en you go to the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as a foreperson during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussions are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have considered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if you are convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not give up your + +honest beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that you and your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answer. I have already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You must follow my instructions and the form carefully. ou must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions in the order the,.4 z te you answer a question, the form tells you what to do next. I will now McO to you: (read form of verdict) fter + +You will be given (state number) forms of verdict, w form of verdict) all now read to you: (read + +your verdat verdict) If you find for in the following form: (read form of + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, (ve S \e't will be in the following form: (read form of verdict) + +Your verdict must be u it us, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. When you have a our verdict and finished filling out the form, your foreperson must write the da sign it at the bottom and return the verdict to the bailiff. + +If need to communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it to the It . In your note, do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. You may now retire to decide your verdict. + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 51 of 53 + +> IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. 47k + +SCOTT ROTHSTE individually, and L.M., IN, individually, J. + +Defendant, + +CO % + +#### VERDICT FO + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +- (1) Did Jeffrey Epstein initiate and/o civil claim against maliciously and without probabl + +Yes + +((your answer is 'No' d0 %0 en question (2) below. .(1 however, your answer is 'Yes, please proceed to que • n j. + +- (2) What t e amount of damage, if any, sustained by to his reputation an' to ame, humiliation, mental anguish and hurt feelings, as a consequence of doing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +- (3) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by for loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 52 of 53 + +(4) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by for lost time in the past, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +(5) Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that punitive damages damages warranted + +Jeffrey Epstein? Yes No + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800rOCXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 53 of 53 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +CO 'S-A + +/ + +# VERDICT FO c + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +\ + +- (1) What is the total amount of p damages, if any, which you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, shout ed against Jeffrey Epstein? + +If you elect not to assess nitive amages against Jeffrey Epstein, you should enter a zero (0) as the amount of damages, and sig ete the verdict form. + +[If you have elec remaining ques damages agai to assess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein then you should skip the gn and date the verdict form. If, however, you have elected to assess punitive y Epstein, then you should answer the following questions:] + +intent to ha time of osaury, los or damage to and did the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein in fact harm A did Jeffrey E two have a s ific + +Yes No + +Was the wrongful conduct of Jeffrey Epstein motivated solely by unreasonable financial gain and was the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, actually known by Jeffrey Epstein? \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f672b3bba662846e6ea4a260aae12b2858e644e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836/EFTA02764836.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3384 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764836.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 53, + "chars": 67346, + "elapsed_seconds": 24.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.896, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 107.103515625 + ], + [ + 310.896, + 107.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 495.8372802734375, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 495.8372802734375, + 362.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 362.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 200.73600000000002, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 288.864, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 288.864, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.39849853515625, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.39849853515625, + 110.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 110.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 392.0443115234375, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 392.0443115234375, + 107.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 107.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.11279296875, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.11279296875, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 389.5188903808594, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 389.5188903808594, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 280.84381103515625, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 280.84381103515625, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 237.1735382080078, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 237.1735382080078, + 121.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 121.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for the court or courtroom personnel:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 134.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 314.5758361816406, + 134.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 314.5758361816406, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 149.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 194.52279663085938, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 194.52279663085938, + 286.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 286.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED \nTESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 541.70068359375, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 541.70068359375, + 137.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 137.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 161.4375 + ], + [ + 246.0539093017578, + 161.4375 + ], + [ + 246.0539093017578, + 176.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 176.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "0 b. interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 265.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 435.82501220703125, + 265.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 435.82501220703125, + 284.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 284.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 202.20050048828125, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 202.20050048828125, + 421.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 421.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Stipulations.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 531.9199829101562 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 531.9199829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Admissions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 94.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 159.28395080566406, + 94.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 159.28395080566406, + 108.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 108.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Applicable to all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 121.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 251.68511962890625, + 121.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 251.68511962890625, + 136.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 136.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Applicable to fewer than all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 201.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 293.5918273925781, + 201.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 293.5918273925781, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 216.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC \nOR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 526.3182373046875, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 526.3182373046875, + 121.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 121.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 536.0618896484375, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 536.0618896484375, + 122.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 513.442626953125, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 513.442626953125, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 136.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 150.76596069335938, + 136.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 150.76596069335938, + 150.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 150.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids bas i ted assumptions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 480.76507568359375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 480.76507568359375, + 342.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 342.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 119.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 120.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 254.0213623046875, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 254.0213623046875, + 125.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 125.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 228.58583068847656, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 228.58583068847656, + 125.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 125.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.5 MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 166.07125854492188, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 166.07125854492188, + 124.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 124.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 412.05865478515625, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 412.05865478515625, + 111.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 111.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Concurring cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 313.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 196.03302001953125, + 313.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 196.03302001953125, + 327.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 327.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.7 LEGAL CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 198.4921875, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 198.4921875, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 136.058837890625 + ], + [ + 216.70779418945312, + 136.058837890625 + ], + [ + 216.70779418945312, + 150.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 150.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 193.75657653808594, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 193.75657653808594, + 504.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 504.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 224.89205932617188, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 224.89205932617188, + 123.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 123.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 304.04718017578125, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 304.04718017578125, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 368.56890869140625, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 368.56890869140625, + 123.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 123.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 C\na. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, \n#gp,gu\nish, hurt feelings:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 359.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 443.9664611816406, + 359.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 443.9664611816406, + 391.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 391.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPENSATORY DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 271.82598876953125, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 271.82598876953125, + 341.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 341.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Loss of Capacity for the ment of Life.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 318.6024475097656, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 318.6024475097656, + 484.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 484.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. \nn lost time shown:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 249.97265625, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 249.97265625, + 559.1835174560547 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 559.1835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO \nDETERMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.3279113769531, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.3279113769531, + 134.60302734375 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 134.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES \u2014 BIFURCATED PROCEDURE 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 378.216, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 378.216, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 304.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 105.040283203125 + ], + [ + 325.5615539550781, + 105.040283203125 + ], + [ + 325.5615539550781, + 119.093505859375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 119.093505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(1). Opening instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 236.25416564941406, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 236.25416564941406, + 140.93701171875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 140.93701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(2,). Punitive damages \u2014 determination of amount:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 319.1815490722656, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 319.1815490722656, + 259.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 259.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Closing instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 93.4202880859375 + ], + [ + 240.03167724609375, + 93.4202880859375 + ], + [ + 240.03167724609375, + 107.18707275390625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 107.18707275390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "405.4 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 325.584, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 325.584, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 108.53999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 286.39495849609375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 286.39495849609375, + 109.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 109.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.2295227050781, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.2295227050781, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 459.5293884277344, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 459.5293884277344, + 122.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 535.76123046875, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 535.76123046875, + 110.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 110.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 107.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 354.3598327636719, + 107.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 354.3598327636719, + 121.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 121.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 475.7711486816406, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 475.7711486816406, + 122.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 122.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 332.0466003417969, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 332.0466003417969, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 336.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 336.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.06, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 134.103515625 + ], + [ + 309.06, + 134.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FO c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 372.1632385253906, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 372.1632385253906, + 336.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 336.6035461425781 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764836" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b0227ca2c73fe1de3392f16ce78f1686b673e17 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED +10 SEP 17 PM 3:39 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIC 4 + +**NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING EXPERT INTERROGATORIES +TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through 16 have been directed to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, this 16th day of September, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 16th day of September, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Expert Interrogatories To Jeffrey Epstein + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea5833f1dbfe144f4fc1d0528c00708987bb23d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889/EFTA02764889.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764889.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2166, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING EXPERT INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.108, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 470.862, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 470.862, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 132.108, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.056, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.056, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764889" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c9145f7e6d8e662cefff66c11ed11da714f4b7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.md @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ividually, IIMIM J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## Th ' REPLY TO EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOMMIE MOTION IN LIMINE FILED FEBRUARY 6, 2018 + +04 + +Counter-Plaintiff, ME J. Elle, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Reply to Epstein's Response in Opposition to ' Motion in Limine filed February 6, 2018, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +1. Epstein's Response offers no case law to support his contention that, despite blackletter law forbidding any such argument, Epstein should nonetheless be permitted to make "comparative ve clear error anclms their civil'molestation cases to the damages sought by in this malicious prosecution ff 7 ents to the jury. Epstein instead simply invites the Court to commit him to compare the settlements received by L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe in counterclaim. Consistent with Wynn and & Millworks, the Court should decline Epstein's invitation. + +2. In addition, Epstein's argument that it is a "fair comment on the evidence" to argue that is selfishly seeking more damages than he recovered in the three settlements EIMI, ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: jaSSICA040800XXXXMBAG + +Reply to Epstein's Response in Opposition to Motion in Limine + +Page 2 of 4 + +ignores the fact that such argument has no relevance to any material fact at issue in this malicious prosecution case. The jury cannot be asked to determine M. damages to his reputation, mental anguish, shame, humiliation, loss of the enjoyment of life, and lost time by considering the settlements received by Epstein's victims due to the horrendous sC abuse they suffered at his hands. The claims are different, the parties are different, th e categories are different, the factors influencing the settlement decision are differennn (I b se who controlled the decision as to whether to accept a settlement offer are different. 484ver, settlements never represent the jury value of the contested claim, making any improper comparison argument particularly irrelevant. Any such commentary is thereforeharled under the most basic 401 analysis. + +3. Epstein expressly alleged in \*s-b le lawsuit againstIMMIE that the claims of the clients were fablicated d of minimal value. His subsequent voluntary settlement of those claims for \$5.5 nujhou is an acknowledgment of the falsity of those allegations and proves the magnitude of the lability from which Epstein was seeking to shield himself by trying to intimidate . The settlements are directly and solely relevant for those reasons. + +4. these reasons, as well as those stated in ' Motion in Limine, the Court shou Order precluding Epstein's counsel from making these irrelevant and inflammatory arguments in the presence of the jury. + +=Mt ADV. EPSTEIN + +la ii.:111A040800XXXXMBAG + +' Reply to Epstein's Response in Opposition to Motion in Limine + +Page 3 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2- day of February 2018. + +aAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 16944 CO + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): j ylaw.com and mmccann@searcylavi.co + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone:( 1) 686-6300 + +(5a,) 38 1 + +for J.M. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); +[kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +[marc@nuriklaw.com](mailto:marc@nuriklaw.com) +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23fd971ed9d32c172963454ce74f48c4241b629a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891/EFTA02764891.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764891.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4895, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 541.5194091796875, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 541.5194091796875, + 111.35302734375 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 111.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Th\n' REPLY TO EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOMMIE\nMOTION IN LIMINE FILED FEBRUARY 6, 2018", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 278.17626953125 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 278.17626953125 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764891" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95e860954aa74a5f9d37478e08270b3dc1e51dae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.md @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/V vxrt, -PLAINTIFF'S Y TO EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION O MOTION IN LIMINE FILED UARY 6, 2018 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je a ("Epstein"), hereby moves to strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brad ards' (e) Reply to Epstein's Response in Opposition to Motio c in Limine filed February 6, 2018, and states: + +- 1. On Feb ruisiii6, 20 , tiled a Motion in Limine relating to the comparison of settlement amo s of three clients (LM., E.W. and Jane Doe) and claimed damages in • ' N- +- 2. noticed his Motion for a Uniform Motion Calendar hearing on February 27, 2018. +- 3. On February 21, 2018, Epstein filed his Response in Opposition to Motion. + - 4. On February 22, 2018, filed a Reply to Epstein's Response. + +5. Pursuant to the Court's November 14, 2017, Order Granting Epstein's Motion for Continuance of Trial, the Court informed the parties that Replies to Motions were not allowed: "As to the written motions, only the motion and a response will be permitted. No reply briefs will be allowed absent court order." Exhibit A. + +6. In addition, at the November 29, 2017, hearing the Court stated: + +17 I will remind you that the Court order Avk 18 that I executed relative to the conti s 19 of the trial on 14 November this ye 20 ordered that no replies be provide e 21 Court absent court order. You h ated 22 my order. The replies are being gn red. I 23 do not expect that to be re te absent 24 sanctions. Is that unders Both sides? + +(November 29, 2017, Transcript, p. 3, Exhibit B.) "N r + +s'k 7. While the Court was addressin •sst ns for the pre-trial motions set for hearing on November 29, December 5 \in D ber 7, 2017, it was the undersigned's understanding that the Court's Order tare motion practice. + +In light of the Court's ruC • , in respectfully requests that the Court strike IIM Reply to Epstein's Response to tir ds' Motion in Limine filed on February 6, 2018. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 22, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, SuifE 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By: + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockcn ch BN 44903) Angela M. Man (FB 80) Primary: Scoit(hlinkrocklaw.com Primary:LKaraQi linkrocklaw.com Prim ucla®IinIcrocklaw.com TinaAlinkrocklaw.com Trov(alinkrocklaw.com : Tanya( linkrocklaw.com dart': Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. + +SCOTT ROTI-\_ ISTEIN i\_individually, and J. individually, L M, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +4 + +## ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL SETTING HEA NGS AND RESETTING CASE FOR SPECIAL SET TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Motion for Continuance of Trial and to Extend Pre-Trial Deadlines or, in the Alternative, Bifurcation of Trial, and the court, having heard arguments of counsel, having reviewed the motion and the attachments as well as the court file, and being fully advised of the premises it is: + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to continue is granted thereby mooting the remaining motions. + +Under the circumstances of this unusual and relatively complex case, the court finds that there are simply too many significant, lengthy motions that are pending and need to be heard prior to December 5, 2017, the date that the trial was originally scheduled to commence. The court and counsel have tried to schedule these extensive and numerous pretrial motions but due to the busy schedules of all concerned, trying to hear all of the motions between now (November 14, 2017) and prior to December 5, 2017, would cause undue strain on the part of the court and counsel. At this late juncture, not knowing how the court will rule on critical issues would require counsel to try to strategize and plan their respective cases under extreme uncertainty and duress. + +To stem this overriding concern but also taking into account the age of the case (the case's extensive appellate history is well known to the parties and will not be repeated here), the court specially sets this case Number 1 for the ten (10) day period commencing March 13, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10C. In the interim, lead counsel of record shall prepare a list of the parties' respective motions and the agreed sequence of the motions to be heard as well as the total anticipated time for argument (motion, response and rebuttal only). As to the written motions, only the motion and a response will be permitted. No reply briefs will be allowed + +absent court order. This schedule shall be prepared and presented to the court no later than noon on November 17, 2017 as the court will be on vacation during Thanksgiving week. In addition to the November 29, 2017 date already provided (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. and allowing one hour and fifteen minutes for lunch), the court is opening up December 5, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.) and December 7, 2017 (10:00 a.m. — noon) so that all pending motions (only) can be heard. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14th day of November, 2017. + +![](_page_6_Picture_2.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +# Copies furnished to: + +- Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) James (brad@pathtojustice 1.7 Fred Haddad (haddadfm@aol.com) 17 John Scarola (mep@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN, JR (JACKER +- KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH (KBROCK@FLACIVILLAW COM) F7 Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) F7 Matthew D Weissing (mptt@pathtojustice.com) +- **Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@tlappellatelaw.com)** +- **PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COM)** +- service©jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrial.com) +- Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) +- William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- William Chester , Jr. (wcblaw@aol.com) 17 William B.. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) +- John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) +- Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com) +- Angela Many (angela@linkrocklaw.com) + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com)** + +▪ **John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com)** + +**Fred Haddad (Dee@fredhaddadlaw.com)** + +**James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com)** + +**Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com)** + +**tr, NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**fr, JaymeMi Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) A ,** + +**Fred Haddad (fredhaddad@fredhaddadlaw.com) IZ7** + +**Andrew A Harris arh@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**• Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com)** + +**• John R. Beranek aberanek@ausley.com)** + +**F7 (staff.efile@pathtojustice.c** + +**)** ▪ **Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com** + +▪ **Kara Berard Rockenbach (kara@linkrocklaw.com)** + +**• NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com)** + +**Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com)** + +**• Angela M. Many (tanya@linkrocklaw.com** + +**Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.** + +**• Kara Berard Rockenbach (troy@lInkrocklaw.com)** + +**• W ChesterM Jr (wcblawasst@gmall.com)** + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +# TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS + +DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017 + +TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m. + +PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C + +t Palm Beach, Florida + +BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept) + +Sonja D. + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +THE COURT: We are here on Epstein versus Rothstein and . The two applicable parties being dealt with -- have a seat, please. Thank you. + +being Mr. Epstein and Mr. and the counterclaim brought by Mr. against Epstein relative to a malicious A(54r prosecution claim that has been brought IS' (::!' will confine our arguments to that particular matter. And we wil gee, in mind the following: Direct all arguments to the bench. Please d eak to each other. Please stay om any pejorative, unne ar comments as it relates, in ar, to the counter-de + +A÷° rdered that no remind you that the Court order I executed relative to the continuous r he trial on 14 November this year, replies be provided to the Court absent court order. You have violated my order. The replies are being ignored. I do not expect that to be repeated, absent sanctions. Is that understood? Both sides? \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9142f296a0b53f14f544cf1f4ec83e55d317bfcb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/EFTA02764895.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,628 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 14013, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.96, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/V vxrt, -PLAINTIFF'S \nY TO EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION O MOTION \nIN LIMINE FILED UARY 6, 2018", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 476.9989013671875, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 476.9989013671875, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 104.60302734375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 104.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, \nMOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL SETTING HEA NGS AND RESETTING \nCASE FOR SPECIAL SET TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 337.85302734375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 337.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 173.647705078125, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 173.647705078125, + 325.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 325.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764895" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/_page_6_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/_page_6_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31a8f4578b8034adedf7ee741ef9c432f4c2dfba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764895/_page_6_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5cb3fd3ac0e701b8beee37160fbd0b8bc1bd0fb12bc5b084cdb8acbb06f20a53 +size 13604 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92e9f58f5488b024aed8d7800d2f7498318ce237 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +CO S + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +d% AC) + +## RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS + +J. by and through his undersigned attorneys, reserves all objections to the depositions of E.W., I oIle ., and Jane Doe taken in other proceedings including, but not limited to the objection thatall sue depositions are hearsay and because those taken after Jeffrey Epstein sued in December of 2009 could have no relevance. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Epstein's Deposition Designations Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this c day of f , 2018. + +JACK OLA Floe. No.: 169440 cann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam q,sear4law.com Searcy Denney Scarola B,amhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, rida 33409 Phone: (561) 68 Fax: 561-3Ak Attorney f i!@ley + +A ey E-Mail(s): • + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response to Epstein's Deposition Designations +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Epuein's Deposition Designations Page 4 of 4 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..852fe369d7b3f67393ae0bcfa55ad078360fc059 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906/EFTA02764906.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764906.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2935, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 493.6462707519531, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 493.6462707519531, + 426.363037109375 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 426.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764906" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d601538f91b4d0249db3624b411982da30828f1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.md @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXX/vD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE SECOND MOT 111 I DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOS INF Y EPSTEIN'S OUNTER-PLAINTIFF FT CONFIDENTIALITY F CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT N + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J filed by Defendant/Counter-PI Designation of Epstein's Disc states: ey J. ("Epstein'), opposes the Second Motion (`a), to Lift Confidentiality of Confidential Settlement Information [D.E. 1196], and + +Cos + +### INTRODUCTION + +\*th his position throughout this litigation, Epstein asks this Court to prevent pt — clearly evident through this second request to disclose gross settlement amounts - to turn this single lawsuit and malicious prosecution counterclaim into a month-long trial of mini-trials, all of which pertain to unrelated claims, lawsuits, or claimants who were never represented by Simply, Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality should be denied and this Court's decision to allow any evidence about settlements relating to non- + +Edward claimants should be changed. The gross number of settlements and the settlement amounts are irrelevant to the issues in this case, and are unfairly prejudicial even if relevant. Furthermore, the gross settlement amounts do not support "motive" argument and are improper impeachment evidence. + +However, if the Court maintains its ruling that the number of settlements pre December 6, 2009 and post December 6, 2009 are admissible, then the settlement amoun Id not be publicly revealed until trial and until Epstein is provided the opportunity At the hearing on first Motion to Lift Confidentiality, Mr catedly told the Court that was actively involved in all of the iden ' . As a result, before disclosure Epstein should be permitted to take n for the limited purpose of questioning him about his involvement in each S s led cases, whether the plaintiffs consented to his taking the lead in their 'eh lawyers consented, if there is any documentation to support this "lead" c ntio hat evidence has that Epstein was aware of alleged I participation in the negotiation of these settlements, and if iv fee from any of those settlements in which he was the "lead" lawyer. These are vant areas of inquiry which came up post discovery closing and driven by the C 's ruli rgs in the last two months and specifically on the issue of lifting confidentialiO + +On January 5, 2018, the Court ordered Epstein to disclose as confidential, for attorneys' and client's eyes only, "the number of claims settled regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein" from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009, and the + +### BACKGROUND + +"gross settlement amount." The same was ordered for the period December 7, 2009 through the present. See Exhibit A (the "Confidentiality Order"). + +Epstein timely produced this court-ordered information to in a document titled "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Client's Eyes Only Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information." The Confidentiality Order requires a party to file an approp ate motion to lift the confidentiality designation prior to quoting, disclosing, relying on e g in this litigation any of the confidential settlement information. See Exhibit A at0 + +first moved to lift the confidentiality designatio con g the aggregate number of claims settled by Epstein before and after this law w ed. [D.E. 1165.] On February 12, 2018, the Court granted Motio ose cases in which Prosecuted or participated both before an ein filed the subject lawsuit." See February 12, 2018, Order attached as Exhibit ( t \ in + +That same day, following this 's • g, filed his Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality. [D.E. 1196.] Ed seeks to lift the confidentiality designation as to the gross settlement amounts paid Ep t in before and after this lawsuit was filed. bases his motion on the reason \*fled in his First Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation [D.E. 1165], and on rted intention to introduce the gross settlement amounts into evidence hi + +Epstein incorporates herein the arguments set forth in his Response in Opposition to first Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designations of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information. [D.E. 1192.] + +### ARGUMENT + +# A. The Gross Settlement Amounts of Other Claims are Irrelevant to the Issues in This + +The number of unrelated claims settled by Epstein with individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein and the gross settlement amounts have no bearing on Counterclaim for malicious prosecution and Epstein does not believe ANY of the information should be admissible at trial. in his own filings. To quote from arguing to the jury that has taken the same position as to e amounts himself, in his recent Motion in Limine lu e Epstein is seeking substantially more mo is own alleged anxiety and emotional distress than he recovered collectively for his tree clients: + +> Obviously, there is no relevance whatsoever . parties were different, the cases were different, the cl m different, the damage categories were different, and t rsi to settle a claim always involves compromise . . ent has no potential to prove or disprove any material d, ven if it did, would be unfairly prejudicial. + +[D.E. 1189,151 Exactly. + +In fact, the only lawsuit E a "partner" at the Rothstein 1 claims against Epstein Rothstein about allegations filed b ACtisar was against Rothstein and because he was Unless the other lawyers who represented clients with o partners at the Rothstein law firm and communicated with penning lawsuits, there could be nothing about Epstein's lawsuit's Id have made them worried that they too could be a defendant in a lawsuit Without a partnership and communication with Rothstein, those other attorneys would have no basis to rush to settle their clients' lawsuits. Therefore, the settlement amounts of other claimants have no relevance in this trial. + +However, because the Court is allowing to present information about the number of claims, Epstein believes the settlement amounts should also be disclosed in order to provide the jury with a complete picture of the potential liability Epstein was facing, which clearly contradicts "motive" theory. + +## B. "Motive" Argument is Meritless, Too + +adopts the argument in his First Motion to Lift Confidentiality that one of Epstein's primary motives in filing this lawsuit was "to intimidate [claimants] • to cheaply compromising or abandoning" their claims against Epstein. [D.E. 1165 at ¶5.] 4the gross settlement amounts paid by Epstein before filing this lawsuit would bet Those claims had already settled. Further, this alleged motive is belied by c three claimants—who settled with Epstein after he filed suit agains Med for more than any other claimant! This does not reflect intimidation , abandonment of claims or cheap compromise. In fact, when comparing the p 60- ; a' < t-suit settlement numbers, Epstein settled more claims for more money after fir c Zainst Si + +### C. Any Probative Value is Outw ed t he Danuer of Unfair Prejudice and Jury Confusion + +To the extent M C I remote relevance, any alleged probative value "is substantially outweighed by the ger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless p tatiln 6f cumulative evidence." § 90.403, Fla. Stat. " `Unfair prejudice' has been desc • n undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though n inflames jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions.' " (Fla. 2009). ily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is directed at evidence which v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 + +If the jury in this case hears the gross settlement amounts paid by Epstein before and after this lawsuit was filed, this will unfairly prejudice Epstein by confusing and distracting the jury from the primary issue before them—whether Epstein had probable cause to file his lawsuit + +against . Compare United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Levine a rel. Howard, 87 So. 3d 782, 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (lower court properly excluded evidence that the insurance company settled some of the other car accident claimants' claims, because the admission of such evidence brought the risk of distracting the jury by taking their focus away from the real issue whether the insurance company acted in bad faith in failing to settle the plaintiff's claim; "the trial court fairly balanced the purported relevance and probative value of the [otl ttlemcnts against the prejudicial impact"). ACZY + +Undue delay is also possible, as the introduction of the ell ent amounts may lead to a trial within a trial. See Slocum v. State, 757 So. 2d () 6, (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("To open the door to evidence about an unrelated case to to a trial within a trial; there was a risk that the trial would be needlessly len \et obscure the discovery of the truth."). at the additional evidence would + +# D. Settlement of Sexual Miscond laiS is Improper Impeachment Evidence + +Regardless of the numbe rence to Epstein having settled claims for sexual misconduct is also inadmissi un e section 90.609, Florida Statutes. Such references are inadmissible as they are nt to Epstein's truthfulness agreement. See § 90.609, Fla. Stat. (2017) (characte ceSnce 'de , used to impeach a witness "may refer only to character relating to truthfulness'() + +### E. tivelv, Epstein Should Be Permitted to Depose on These Post-Di very Matters + +The Court has already ruled that confidentiality be lifted "as to those cases in which prosecuted or participated both before and after Epstein filed the subject lawsuit." See Exhibit B. If the Court now rules that the gross settlement amounts arc also admissible, Epstein should be permitted to depose on these matters which came to light after discovery had closed. + +### CONCLUSION + +Epstein respectfully requests that Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Information be denied. Alternatively, Epstein requests that he be permitted to take deposition for the limi forth above. oses set + +g + +the attorneys listed on the ng portal pursuant to Florida I certify that the foregoing document has been film Service List below on February 22, 2018, through the Ct Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + ++6s + +LIN ' O ENBACH, PA 1 1 Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 P m Beach, Florida 33401 "4 (56 ...,, 27-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +> y: Is/ScottJ. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara©IinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +**ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's *ore tenus* motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, + +ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: + +1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ J. ██████ ("██████") the following: + +a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + +b. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 6, 2007 to December 6, 2009; + +c. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present; and + +*"The court has reviewed the heavy transaction and the concepting orders and finds that this order captures more accurately the intent of the court as it relates to the court's bral rulings at the surface hearing."* + +d. The gross settlement amount paid by Epstein to individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein, from December 7, 2009 through the present. + +2. The number of claims and amounts shall be produced as "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," and shall not, directly or indirectly, b 84sed to anyone else or used outside of this litigation. + +3. If a party intends to quote, disclose, rely on or use in this litigation information or documents that have been deemed "Confidential, for Attorneys' and Clients' Eyes Only," whether in papers filed with the Court or verbally, in connection with a motion, hearing, deposition or trial, before any such information is quoted, disclosed, relied upon or used, the party must file a Motion to have the information or documents deemed to be no longer confidential, must file the information or documents under seal in accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 and have the proposed quote, disclosure, reliance or use of such information or documents heard and approved by the Court. • + +4. The Court defers rulings on the admissibility of the number of claims and the gross settlement amounts disclosed pursuant to this Order and the admissibility of the combined settlementTamounts of-' three clients for whom was prosecuting civil cases against Epstein at the time Epstein filed the December 7, 2009 lawsuit against No production of the underlying Settlement Agreements with each of-' three clients or with any other alleged victim is required by this Order. The Court defers ruling on whether there will be any further disclosure of any breakdown of the settlement amounts paid by Epstein. + +5. Epstein shall file a new Motion addressing separately the admissibility of the aggregate settlement amount paid to three clients and the gross settlement amounts + +disclosed pursuant to this Order. The Motion should also address Epstein's position as to the production of any Settlement Agreements underlying any settlements paid by Epstein and outline the confidentiality provisions governing those agreements. To the extent that disclosure of any such provisions is subject to confidentiality, disclosure shall be made under seal-in -accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. + +6. The parties shall schedule a 30-minute hearing on Epstein's Motion. S shall respond to the Motion in accordance with this Court's judicial in ctions. + +DONE AND ORD in West Palm Beach, Palm Be County, Florida this 'Tlay of DuceiTiEr; 20131 + +> DONALD W. HAFELE UDGE + +| Jack Scarola | Nichole J. Segal | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepQsearcylaw.com | h rt & Shipley, P.A. Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | +| isx@searcvlaw.corn | nis@FLAAppellateLaw.com | +| scarolateamgisearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Sinsellairdant/Coimter-Plaintiff J. | +| J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401 brad@epllc.com | Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com | +| staffietile@pathotojustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Compelling Epstein to Produce Settlement Amounts Page 4 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(Thampa.com smahonev@agv'pa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Angela M. Many Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 , Scott@linkrocklaw.com - Karealinkrocklaw.com Aneela@linkrocklaw.coui Tina@linkrocklaw.com Troy@linkrocklaw.com Tanya@linkrocklaw.com EserviceQlinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey E stein' ti + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S +DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: that the notion is granted as + +to those cases in which Gralley Edwards movement or participated both before and after 10 +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11 + +day of Jun, 2018. + +![]()DONALD HAFELE +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +*Epstein filed the subject carrier.* (P) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstein's +Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion to Lift Confidential Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw. Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrockla Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Phone: (561)-727-3600 S 9 Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire mare@nuriklaw.com AfILIS One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301N7 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothst gin oilir \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90716004621b46b70eb8b57484ef72855331cbc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910/EFTA02764910.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1039 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764910.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 24437, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE \nSECOND MOT 111 I \nDESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOS \nINF \nY EPSTEIN'S \nOUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nFT CONFIDENTIALITY \nF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT \nN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 531.8014526367188, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 531.8014526367188, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 356.1502990722656, + 518.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 356.1502990722656, + 532.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 532.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 353.03448486328125, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 353.03448486328125, + 583.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 583.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 583.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 583.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Gross Settlement Amounts of Other Claims are Irrelevant to the Issues in This", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. \"Motive\" Argument is Meritless, Too", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.8722229003906, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 354.8722229003906, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Any Probative Value is Outw ed t\nhe Danuer of Unfair Prejudice and Jury \nConfusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 543.0466918945312, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 543.0466918945312, + 430.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 430.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Settlement of Sexual Miscond laiS is Improper Impeachment Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 505.1571350097656, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 505.1571350097656, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. tivelv, Epstein Should Be Permitted to Depose on These Post-\nDi very Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 597.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 597.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.352, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 89.352, + 325.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 469.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.284, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 310.284, + 131.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 392.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 392.84999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 176.57999999999998 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 176.57999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764910" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..439d280aaed791745b712e27c393de36b2b4404d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800=MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON J. MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS OF L.M. E.W. AND JANE DOE AND THE DAMAGES SOUGHT BY + +THIS CAUSE having come to, be considered upon J. MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING CO CIAR1SON BETWEEN THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS OF L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE A HE DAMAGES SOUGHT BY and the Court having revie% J. d the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: "A" C7'12' .4-ea-ots`z-e40. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County Florida, this 2 -7 day of • , 2018. + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attache + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on [REDACTED] MIL re Comparison Between Settlement Amounts + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on MIL re Comparison Between Settlement Amounts + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrockhx. Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com; Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrockl .co Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 i Phone: (561)-727-3600 4/) 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 S Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +( -IC C .1 °143v + ++ 14/ ) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..263c5e6aea1bdcfc25ac23c61e56a7a618bea0c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927/EFTA02764927.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764927.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2849, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 185.49 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764927" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..387e5084c79afb3bea3d08ad3c241ddbb4650092 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.md @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: .502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, L.M., , individually, and + +Defendant(s). + +# MOTIOAO ACC PEL + +Counterplaintiff, ItEdWar/ds, by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves this Honorable Court to enter an order compelling Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein to respond to the attached Requests for Adt s over the Counterdefendant's assertions and objections and in support would at the response to Request #1 is impermissibly evasive and the objection based o;p.L Request #2 has been waived. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26Th day of Feb, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +jmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] Ed [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG Motion to Compel + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +s A Co + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANt V EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE T DEFENDANTer R-PLAINTIFF STS FOR ADMISSION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Procedure 1.370, responds to De February 6, 2018, Requests for pstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil er-Plaintiff J. a') as follows: + +- I. The printout of you York State Sex Offender registration page attached [to the Request] as "t 'A' is authentic. + +not admit or deny this request because he has no control over or personal A L. ge about the authenticity of the registration attached as Exhibit 'A' to wards' Request. + +- 2. e information contained in the printout of your New York State Sex Offender registration page attached [to the Request] as Exhibit 'A' is accurate. + +## RESPONSE + +Epstein cannot admit or deny this request because any response would require the disclosure of information which could communicate a statement of fact that is testimonial in nature. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). There is a + +substantial and reasonable basis for concern that such testimonial statements of fact could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute him in future criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). Additionally, Epstein cannot respond to this request without waiving his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 2, 9 and 16 of the Florida Constitution. + +### **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 20, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0fe75271b9e17a1fc15b50d27e92880ecadeef8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930/EFTA02764930.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,450 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764930.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 9696, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 113.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 113.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTIOAO ACC PEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 369.37554931640625, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 369.37554931640625, + 398.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 398.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.5142211914062, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.5142211914062, + 127.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 127.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANt V EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE T DEFENDANTer R-PLAINTIFF \nSTS FOR ADMISSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 467.3770446777344, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 467.3770446777344, + 379.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 379.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 523.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 195.93919372558594, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 195.93919372558594, + 644.6835174560547 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 644.6835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 192.77999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 99.63 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764930" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e3472d69f93db189c49c0b7f17ac5d9f568e164 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.md @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, L.M., individually, and + +Defendant, + +## REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE tar SITION TO a' SECOND MOTION TO LWI' CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT INFORMATION + +J. by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Reply to Epstein's Response in Oppositionto'Edwards' Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information, as follows: + +cos + +Jeffrey Epstein n make up his mind about the admissibility of evidence regarding the amount of o ttlements. He has argued through counsel at the last related hearing that he wanted th e admitted, then refused to stipulate to its admission. The instant motion was and is I n solely to compel the counter/defendant to make a choice. We will deal with whatever choice Epstein makes, but the vacillation must end. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to [REDACTED] Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality +Designation of Jeffrey Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information +Page 2 of 3 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of Feb., 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFY + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; +tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1903aad2e1391f466a4d3db5447f675c9005eaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937/EFTA02764937.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764937.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3384, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE tar SITION TO \na' SECOND MOTION TO LWI' CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION OF \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT \nINFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.62000274658203, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 529.5401000976562, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 529.5401000976562, + 385.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 83.62000274658203, + 385.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 157.14000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764937" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fabed24c7347f7bf4f10158d248d449317eb724 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.md @@ -0,0 +1,827 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXX/vD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTEL MOTION FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE FIFTH AMENDMENT ASSER AND APRIL 15.2 JBOIFt.EY EPSTEIN'S FF CTIONS REGARDING EPSTEIN'S FINANCIAL DISCOVERY EST TO PRODUCE + +Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant pstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to the Motion filed by Defendant/ aintiff for Adverse Inference Instructions Rrgrding pstein's Fifth Amendment Assertions to Financial Discovery and April 15, 2011 c ques ,, o Produce [D.E. 1199], and states: + +### INTRODUCTION + +Ed Its two improper adverse inferences: (1) a vague "adverse inference as to all Fifth Am • ment assertions concerning punitive damage net worth discovery" and (2) "an adverse inference jury instruction that communications exist between Epstein and the government evidencing that Epstein committed the crimes he was accused of committing." + +unfair prejudice. Instead, the j favor based solely o Adverse inferences Amendment privilege are prejudicial. against parties to civil properly admitted % on assertions of the Fifth #c 'eIIIV are relevant, and not unfairly offers no legal support ( c b• judicial request. The adverse inferences requested are improper where—as he re tt....e y pr ative value is far outweighed by the danger of instructed that it may not draw any inference in s assertion of the Fifth Amendment. act + +### A. Epstein's ? ocatio of the Fifth Amendment Privilege as to Financial Discovery + +interro Epste finally asserted the Fifth Amendment privilege in response to lat and production requests seeking net worth discovery. Following extensive discovery requests, responses, motions and hearings, Epstein amended his discovery answers, produced portions of his tax returns and stipulated that his present net worth is more than \$100 million. See July 10, 2013 Notice of Serving Unverified Amended Answers to Interrogatories No. 14. (Exhibit A.) At a subsequent hearing on September 16, 2013, Epstein's counsel + +In this civil malicious prosecution action, Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination with respect to net worth discovery and the April 15, 2011 Request to Produce. wants this Court to instruct a civil jury that they must conclude Epstein committed crimes he was accused of committing. The two are not connected. Not only is such an adverse inference unsupported by the law and reversible error, it is a preview o improper attempt to pile on what the jury will already hear this Court ruled issible-Epstein's guilty plea for solicitation of prostitution and procurement fore%t Anything additional is clearly attempt to inflame the jury with gasof C e N ire, ensuring this case will be tried twice. + +## B k (-KC:ROUND + +informed the Court that the Fifth Amendment issue remained as to the pending discovery dispute and counsel stated, "I will accept Ms. Coleman's representation on the record that all of the discovery that has been withheld has been withheld solely on the basis of the Fifth Amendment privilege." (T. 21.)1 Epstein's counsel clarified, "The discovery that was at issue is the net-worth discovery for the punitive damages." (T. 21.) After further discussion, accepted Epstein's position that the financial discovery was withheld on thee the Fifth AS Amendment privilege. (T. 22.) + +Judge resulting Order on Motion to D Oatus of Punitive Damage Discovery and Applicability of Adverse Inferen p y deferred ruling on request for an adverse inference jury 8 instructio i and stated that: "At the time S of trial, upon specific analysis of the specific quest. a , wers, including those propounded in discovery, the Court will determine wheth av7rtse instruction will, or will not, be given and the specific instruction if any, that ' be en. Counsel for the parties shall be prepared at trial to propose such instruction ilsit C) (emphasis added). + +### B. Epstein's Invocation tfth Amendment Privilege as to the April 15, 2011 Request to Produce + +A it 15, 0 1 Request to Produce sought "documents" or "communications" between Epst agents) and any government official relating to allegations of Epstein's alleged c ivity or "tortuous [sic]" conduct. The compound and confusing request asked for: + +> All documents\* constituting, reflecting, or relating to communications between [Epstein] or any agent of [Epstein], on the one hand, and . . . any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. + +1 A copy of the relevant pages of the 9/16/13 Hearing Transcript is attached as Exhibit B. + +### (Exhibit D.) + +In his response, Epstein appropriately asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege to the request for documents with "any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entities which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous [sic] conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged." Epstein's assertion f the Fifth Amendment is clearly justified not only as to the documents, but to the of i entifying responsive documents which may constitute testimonial evidence that wo ' mate him. + +Importantly, the Request for Documents is overly broad. n i an adverse inference were permissible, all that could be inferred is that there exis ents which reflect or relate to communications by Epstein and law enforce tr ovenunent entities relating to "allegations" of "illegal activity" or "tortious co . e request is not limited to documents that support the allegations. That is, the is s road that even if an adverse inference was allowed it would not necessarily hav a Il efenon to the claims asserted in this case, or even to the claims by clienC df in's alleged sexual misconduct. Granting such an adverse inference would be prej • al and completely irrelevant to any claims that Epstein was guilty of crimes alleed to av been committed against clients. + +### ARGUMENT + +- A. not entitled to adverse inferences based on Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment with respect to financial discovery and the April 15, 2011 request to price. + +"[A]dverse inferences are appropriately admitted, however, only if they are relevant, reliable, and not unduly prejudicial." v. START Treatment & Recovery Ctrs., Inc., 864 F.3d 158, 170 (2d Cir. 2017). + +Contrary to suggestion, when a litigant invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege, "the law . . . does not mandate [adverse] inferences" against him. See In re Carp, 340 F. 3d 15, 23 (1st Cir. 2003) (emphasis added). Rather, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976) (emphasis added). See also v. City ago, 513 F.3d 735, 741 (7th Cir. 2008) ("We have interpreted Baxter to mean that we inference against a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment in a civil case is , not required."). + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal has similarly crse inferences against parties to "when they refuse to testify in response to Fraser v. Sec. & Inv. Corp., 615 So. 2d 841, 842 (F . A 1993) (emphasis added). As one court has explained, "[b]ecause the privilege ti tonally based, the competing interests of the party asserting the privilege and ainst whom the privilege is asserted must be carefully balanced and the denim t asserting it should be no more than is necessary to prevent unfair and unnecess pr j ice to the other side. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Richards, 541 F. 3d 903, 910 (9th 8). The Nationwide court also recognized that: offered against them..." + +circumstances . . . an adverse inference from an of one's privilege not to reveal information is too high a to pay. The tension between one party's Fifth Amendment id17\4 and the other party's right to a fair proceeding is resolved by nalyzing each instance where the adverse inference was drawn, or not drawn, on a case-by-case basis under the microscope of the circumstances of that particular civil litigation. The inference may not be drawn "unless there is a substantial need for the information and there is not another less burdensome way of obtaining that information." The district court must determine 'whether the value of presenting] the evidence [is] substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice' to the party asserting the privilege. Moreover, the inference may be drawn only when there is independent evidence of the fact about which the party refuses to testify. + +Id. at 912 (citations omitted and emphasis added). + +Here, the adverse inferences sought are not relevant to this civil action and the clear danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighs any value of the inference. + +## I. Financial Net Worth Adverse Inference Would Constitute Reversib rror + +Epstein provided information for to enter into evidence i n ly event that this case continues to a second phase for punitive damages. In a ded discovery answers, Epstein produced portions of his tax returns and stipulat that is present net worth exceeds \$100 million. (See Exhibit A). Anything further is unsupported by Florida law and would result in a tipping of the scales of justice to dice against Epstein. This Court should deny M' vague request for an ad fe nce concerning punitive damage net worth discovery. + +### 2. An Adverse Inferen hat Epstein Committed the Crimes He Was Accused of Commi Id Constitute Reversible Error + +claims he sou very in this action relating to "Epstein's [alleged] sexual molestation of children his request for production of "...communications between [Epstein] or any of [ pstein]...and/or government entity which communication relates... to any alle 11 egal activity or tortuous [sic] conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engag t. at ¶ 5). This provocatively phrased request in and of itself reveals I= true intent — to repeatedly and consistently inflame and prejudice the jury more than they already will be based on the evidence this Court ruled admissible- Epstein's guilty plea, admission that he served time, and status as a registered sexual offender. + +But, wants more! Instead of focusing on his heavy burden of proving no probable cause to believe could have been connected with partner-Ponzi Schemer Rothstein, focuses on proving Epstein committed crimes. claims he "is entitled to an adverse inference jury instruction that communications exist between Epstein and the government evidencing that Epstein committed the crimes he was accused of committing. (Mot. at ¶ 6). argument contains a disconnect beca is not a criminal trial! Epstein has argued time and time again, his criminal e allegations stemming from that case have nothing to do with 711rlifiota prosecution counterclaim, or his three clients. (See, e.g., Epstein's 2/8 Offender Registry [D.E. 1193]2). in Limine at to Sex + +Based on this Court's pretrial rulings, this ir• Se 1 heady hear about Epstein's I Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and guilty pl nt. It is undisputed — Epstein does not deny — that he pled guilty to one coun i an iie ense that requires him to register as a sexual offender. The NPA required Ep st • ead guilty to a registrable offense, and the plea agreement itself expressly des a Epstein as a sexual offender. Any other "documents" or "communications" for d ards seeks an adverse inference that relate to Epstein's criminal case ores h may have been accused of are irrelevant to this action, extremely prejudicial, ve at this point, and would only serve as an incendiary to the jury. + +econd Circuit has explained: "the danger of unfair prejudice is [already] high when a jury is told that a witness declined to answer a question by invoking the Fifth Amendment; the implication is, at best, that the witness refused to answer because she had something to hide." v. START Treatment & Recovery Ctrs., Inc., 864 F.3d 158, 171 (2d + +2 The criminal offense to which Epstein pled guilty that triad the sexual offender registration requirement related to a specific individual ',iv never client and was a procurement offense, which is not the conduct alleged by clients to have been committed against them. + +Cir. 2017). It is difficult to imagine greater prejudice than from the Court instructing the jury that is entitled to an adverse inference "that communications exist between Epstein and the government evidencing that Epstein committed the crimes he was accused of committing." (Mot. at ¶ 6). + +# 3. Only Cited Case Supports Denial of Request + +The only case cited by Atlas v. Atlas, 708 So. 2d 296 Fla. A 1998), should guide this Court to reject MI request for an adverse inferenc las reiterates that "a court may [i.e., not required to] draw an adverse inference ag in a civil action who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-inc Acl " tio. Id. at 299 (emphasis added). Factually, Atlas involved a contempt proceedin lo the ex-husband's failure to pay child support, failed to present evidence of hi o pay the purge amount, and then invoked the Fifth Amendment concerning h status and his financial affidavit. Id. at 299. The Fourth District Court of App le onc e ed that "[t]he trial court could have properly drawn an adverse inference from husband], who has continuous payment of his child support since 1990, had the ability to pay the purge amount on that would further support a finding that [the ex- + +Here, unl where no financial disclosure was provided for a purge hearing on child suppo Ep in has provided information of his financial status. Anything further would cause uf ejudice and tip the scales of justice in a civil matter against Epstein. + +### B. If any instruction is given, the jury should be instructed that it may not base its verdict solely upon any adverse inference drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment. + +If the Court decides to provide any instruction as it relates to Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the Court should instruct the jury that an + +adverse inference is permitted but not required and that cannot solely rely on Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment as proof of elements that must independently prove to prevail on his malicious prosecution claim, such as lack of probable cause. + +Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, No. 10-60786-C1V, 2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) is particularly instructive. In Coquina, the plaintiffs had invested wi partner, Scott Rothstein, and sued TD Bank for allegedly aiding and abetting R 's fraud. At trial, the plaintiff called TD Bank's former regional vice president as c:5' who asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege to questions regarding his role in the o h fraud. The court instructed the jury that, "Mr. Spinosa's assertion of his Fifth drdClft privilege . . . is not a proper basis for finding TD Bank liable in this case," ' an ertion of the privilege (and any adverse inferences from it) could only be contsIt e jury "in conjunction with other evidence to be presented." Id. at \*9. On post c its• ityNotions, the court confirmed that, "[a] jury can only draw an adverse inference a • t a as to a particular fact when independent evidence exists of the fact to whi refuses to answer. In other words, a judgment cannot rest solely on the adve e in nce." Id. at \*10. See also LaSalle Bank Lake View v. r Seguban, 54 F. 3d 387 ( \* ... 1995) (citing Baxter and holding that an assertion of the Fifth Amendment pnv e mus be "weighed in light of other evidence rather than leaving directly and without e conclusion of guilt or liability."); Centennial Life Ins. Co. v. Nappi, 56 F. SupQ 8 (N.D. N.Y. 1997) ("An adverse inference against the party invoking the Fifth Amendment by itself is insufficient to establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact"). + +At his deposition on November 10, 2017, admitted he had no evidence of Epstein's state of mind or the facts and circumstances known to Epstein regarding probable cause to file his Complaint other than Epstein himself. See Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at + +276:24 - 278:15.3 Given this lack of evidence, will likely attempt to rely on Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in order to disprove Epstein's probable cause for having a reasonable belief that overly zealous litigation tactics as an RRA partner indicated that was involved with Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. See Nov. 10, 2017, Tr. at 227:13-229:13 testifying that he argued Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment as an admission in a federal action and stati t's going to happen in this case, too.'). + +Clearly, Epstein's exercise of his constitutional right to rem 01, s 'nothing to do with his perception and reasonable belief that "partner" status with Rothstein connected to Rothstein's Ponzi sche g of investors. + +Coquina Investments and other similar Amendment cannot be the sole basis for a ve is excused from proving his y i error. Rather, the proper rebalanci not proven on the invocation evidence" to prove a lack lir able cause. e clear that invocation of the Fifth ent. Any suggestion by this Court that ication of Epstein's Fifth Amendment right is an instruction by this Court that case is endment rights and must have "independent + +## CONCLUSION + +Epstc e cctfully requests that this Court deny Motion for Adverse Inference Instru aiding Epstein's Fifth Amendment Assertions to Financial Discovery and April 15, 2011 Request to Produce. + +&#x27;Excerpts oa November 10, 2017, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit E. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on February 26, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Bamh 2139 Palm Beach Lakes West Palm Beach, FA 33 scare law. m endant/Counter-Plaintiff rds hipley, P.A. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fa] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 + +Kara Berard Rockenbac 5 640 903) + +Angela M. Many (Flyt2 + +Primary: Scottalinkrockliw.com + +Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com + +Primary: nkrocklaw.com + +Second + +Seco linkrocklaw.com + +anva(41inkrocklaw.com + +. Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +ounsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbtAFLAnpellateLaw.com Co-Counserardant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel or J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc®nuriklaw.com + +Jack A. Goldberger 250 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldbergerOagwpa.com smahonev®attwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +,1OAlk + +CO + +...agia. + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +.JEFFREY EPSTE1114/I, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN • AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, CASE NO.502009CA0401300thXMBAG + +J, Individually, and L.M., individuallY. ' + +. t -•-,•-\* + +Defendants. + +. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOT ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned5p sel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; heretlydrtifi s that the original amended answers to Defendant's Interrogatories was served upon Defendant via electronic service this July 10, 2013. + +— • /s/ Tonia Haddad Coleman + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 + +LAW OFFICES OF TOMA HADDAD, PA 315 SE l ei Street + +Suite 301 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +954.467.1223 + +.954.337.3716 (facsimile) + +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J, ██████████, +Individually, and L.M., individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED AMENDED +ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT ██████████ INTERROGATORIES** + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.340 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure*, hereby certifies that the original amended answers to Defendant's Interrogatories was served upon Defendant via electronic service this July 10, 2013. + +/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. +Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 +LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, PA +315 SE 7th Street +Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +954.467.1223 +954.337.3716 (facsimile) +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually. + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +JUDGE: [REDACTED] + +Defendants. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO +NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. ("Epstein"), by and through his +undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure* +hereby files his amended responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] Edward's Net +Worth Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein: + +1. What is your full name? + +ANSWER: Jeffrey Edward Epstein + +2. How are you currently employed? + +ANSWER: Self-employed and Philanthropist. + +3. State the amount of your current annual income from all sources for each of the +past 3 years and describe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for +each of the past 3 years including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit sharing +participations, stock options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits and other +prerequisites of your employment including dollar amount or dollar value of each. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial +information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. +391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these +statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the +chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See +*Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses +to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +4. If you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + +- a. The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; +- b. The date and cost of acquisition; +- c. The current fair market value of each such interest; +- d. The manner in which such value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution: + +5. As to each income tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all reported income and the separate amounts derived from each source. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest: state: + +- a. The address; +- b. The legal description of the property; +- c. The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; +- d. The date and price of acquisition; + +- e. Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; +- f. Whether, when and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; +- g. The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; +- h. The cost of any improvements made to the property since purchase; +- i. The nature of your interest in the property; +- j. The current fair market value of the property and a description of the manner in which that value was calculated. + +Answer. Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +- 7. List each item and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property in which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$10,000 or which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, and as to each state: The date of acquisition; e cost of acquisition; The current estimated fair market value; + - d. The manner in which the fair market value was estimated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, + +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +8. If any of the real or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered by a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each property, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document and, if so, a description of that document. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +9. If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + +- a. The name and address of the business; +- b. The present book value and the present market value of your interest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the business; +- c. A description of the manner in which the fair market value was calculated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +10. Identify all banks, credit union and savings and loan accounts, in which you have an interest or right of withdrawal and for each account state: + +- a. Where the account is located; +- b. The highest and lowest balance in the account during the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. + +391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +11. Identify all other assets of a value in access of \$10,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. The date of acquisition; +- b. The cost of acquisition; +- c. The current estimated fair market value; +- d. The means utilized to estimate the current fair market value. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +12. Identify all other liabilities of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously identified and as to each state: + +- a. The date the liability arise; +- b. The amount of the liability at inception; +- c. The terms of repayment or satisfaction; +- d. The current outstanding balance. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, + +Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +13. As to any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years immediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: + +1. a. The date of the calculation or estimate; +2. b. The name and address of the person or entity responsible for performing the work; +3. c. The reason for performing the calculation or estimate; +4. d. The amount of net worth calculated or estimated. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. *Fisher v. United States*, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. *See Hoffman v. United States*, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +14. What is your present net worth? + +Answer: I have already indicated my willingness to stipulate to a net worth in excess of one hundred million dollars: + +15. As to all transfers of anything of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, state: + +1. a. A description of the transferred property; +2. b. The reason for the transfer; +3. c. The value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; +4. d. The date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); +5. e. Whether you received anything of value in exchange for the transferred item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and the dollar value of what you received; +6. f. The name and address of the recipient of each transferred item. + +Answer: Objection. This Interrogatory requires the provision of detailed financial information which communicates statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). I have a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings. See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +ALL + +[THIS PORTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +1 2 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXM8AG + +4 + +5 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +6 + +7 Plaintiff, -VS- + +8 9 10 0100oTHsiiiii mindixicittgy aily, . , in ly, + +11 Defendants. + +HEARING HELD,. THE HONORABLE p + +> tember 16, 2013 .m. - 4:05 p.m. + +205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Reported By: Pamela Pittman Gunn, FPR S Notary public, State of Florida + +1 APPEARANCES: + +2 On behalf of the Plaintiff: Page 1 hrg091613epstein.txt + +21 sometimes the court can look at in-camera to 22 determine if it's -- + +23 MS. COLEMAN: If you would like us to 24 do + +25 THE COURT: NO, I never asked for + +1 in-camera inspection if / don't need to do 0 2 I'm just asking what it is I need to do 3 haven't done in regards to the privileg 4 regard to Mr. Epstein. we're just fitjnngg with 5 this. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: I will ac Coleman's 7 representation on the re all of the 8 discovery that has bee ld has been 9 withheld solely on b s 10 Amendment privi of the Fifth + +11 THE CO e's been a privilege log 12 filed or + +13 m5 COL, N: No. Judge. The answer it's 14 al 'netorth ,i.w discovery. The discovery that 15 was ssue is the net-worth discovery for the 16 -t puni ive damages. + +12 THE COURT: This is probably unfair to you guys. I'm asking questions because it concerns me if there's something out there I'm supposed to be ruling on and I might have to do that. 21 Is there something pending on me that I'm 22 supposed to rule on? + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Not if the only privilege 24 that's being asserted is a Fifth Amendment + +1 did talk about at the time of that last hearing 2 was that some of the financial information that 3 was requested was corporate financial 4 information. And you correctly observed a 5 corporation has no Fifth Amendment privilege. 6 So I don't know -- Your Honor asks the 7 rhetorical question. I don't know how y 8 be asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege 9 regard to the corporate records. + +10 THE COURT: It has to be I even 11 if it's an individual. i r at. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Corre those were the 13 concerns that Your H pp ssed. And it was 14 my understanding shifted the burden AS.4 15 back to the co p. endant to provide 16 something t dour Honor with regard to 17 those ut I will repeat, if the 18 positiorYEbt he counter defendant is that 19 ev ing that has been withheld in discovery 20 has en withheld on the basis of the Fifth 21 endment privilege, I'll accept that 22 representation. + +THE COURT: I'm asking you. I don't want to get -- + +25 MS. COLEMAN: That is not what I said, + +1 Judge. + +2 THE COURT: Hang on. I'm going to set a Page 19 + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +**ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] EDWARDS' +MOTION TO DETERMINE STATUS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGE DISCOVERY. +AND APPLICABILITY OF ADVERSE INFERENCE** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Motion to Determine Status of Punitive Damage Discovery. The Court heard argument of counsel, has reviewed the submittals and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. At hearing, counsel for EDWARDS advised the Court that certain "net worth" discovery in regard to the punitive damage count against EPSTEIN had been objected to on the basis of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. All other objections to such discovery had been withdrawn. As such, [REDACTED] now seeks a ruling from the Court in regard to an adverse inference (presumption) jury instruction and evidence preclusion at the time of trial. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +To the extent that the issue of amount of punitive damages is submitted to the jury at the bifurcated trial of this matter, the Court rules as follows: + +1. The Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] request for jury instruction adverse inference instruction is deferred until the time of trial. At the time of trial, upon specific analysis of the specific question and answers, including those propounded in discovery, the Court will determine whether an adverse instruction will, or will not, be given and the + +2013 NOV 15 PM 3:47 PM +ARROW - 208X SLEEP +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +FILED + +NOT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT + +specific instruction, if any, that will be given. Counsel for the parties shall be prepared at trial to propose such jury instructions. + +2. The Motion to Preclude Evidence is also deferred until the time of trial. At the time of trial, this Court will determine whether certain testimony and/or documents will be precluded based upon non-compliance with this Court's Pretrial Order and/or a *Binger* analysis conducted by the Court at the time of trial. + +3. Nothing in this Order shall be construed in and of itself as precluding the use of any answers submitted by EPSTEIN during discovery at trial if they are otherwise admissible. + +DONE AND ORDERED this day of November, 2013 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: +See attached list. + +Copies furnished by e-mail. + +Edwards.adv. Epstein + +' Pug No.: 50290?c4oftosoaxxNxivt BAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +. Jack Scarota; Esquire jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@seareylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409. . • • Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 381, Attorneys for J. + +William•Chestar Esquire wcblaw@aol.corn; wcbcg®aol.com 250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 • Phone: (561)-655-4777 ' Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Eps'tein + +:Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldbergen@agwpa.com; smahons.y@ag com Atterbury, Goldberger.& 250 Australian Avenue Southinit1;400 West Palm Beach, FL 33461' Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeft y Ep + +"Esquire staf .efle a piahl justice.com Farmer; eissing, Fisios & Lihrman, FL 425- thews Avenue, Suite 2 • \* Fort La erdale, FL 33301 Phone: ( 54)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 • • + +Fred Haddad, Esquire Dee®FredHaddadLaw.com; haddadfrn@aol.com Fred Haddad, P.A. • One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 54009CA040800XXXXMBAC r • . • + +.• + +Fort Laudgdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)-461-6767 .Fax: (954)-467-3599: Attorneys for Jeffrey Eptein + +Marc S. Nurils Esquire marc@nmildaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nuiik. Ohe E Broward Blvd., Suite.700 Fort Lauderdale, Ft 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 • Fax: (954)-745-3556' Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire ' , ..tenja@tonjahaddad.corm Debbie©Tonjahaddad.coin,efili Tonja Haddad, PA. 315 SE 7th Street, Stine 301 Fart Lauderdale, FL 33301 .Phone: (954)-467-1223 . Fax (954)-337-3716 . • Atiomeys for Jeffrey Epstein g@tonjahaddad.com + +• + +It + +t + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s): + +FILED +2011 APR 20 PM 3:17 +SHARON F. BUCK, CLERK +ALLYS BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EP ██████████ + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ██████████ J. Edwards by and through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit Bradley J. ██████████ to inspect and copy each of the following documents\*: + +1. All documents\* constituting, reflecting, or relating to communications between Plaintiff or any agent of Plaintiff, on the one hand, and William Scherer, or any person associated with William Scherer in the practice of law, any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained; translated, if necessary, by the party to + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of April, 2011. + +![]()( ) +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire. +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLUAt, + +VIDEOTPA& SITION + +LEY + +C :Iren on Behalf of Plaintiff + +O + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard .T West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +\,'"; + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 2 3 4 the many topics that, amongst plaintiffs' counsel, we discussed as the way in which Epstein intended to ultimately defeat these cases, which would ultimately prove his serial sexual molestation of minors. + +6 BY MR. LINK: + +7 8 Q So is your concern something that' evidence? + +9 10 0 A And we had a source telling u ou concern was true. + +11 Q I understand. + +12 A Okay, so -- + +13 14 15 16 17 18 4 I have heard e source. I am asking you about evidence. Okay, I don't kn ld me you had concerns. a federal judge cares about your personal on Xns I doubt that a federal judge ti "' cares tha t ou have a source who won't get on the stand. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 0 So whenever I have filed a motion for tion, I intend to put evidence on in front of e court. And I'm asking you, sir, what evidence did you have in this federal proceeding to prove your statement that Mr. Epstein was fraudulently transferring his assets overseas? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. I'm going to + +1 2 object to Counsel's speech about Counsel's experience. Move that it be stricken. + +3 4 And the question as to what evidence did Mr. have -- + +6 7 MR. SCAROLA: -- is a question that has AS been asked and answered repeatedly. Ir + +8 BY MR. LINK: (:... + +9 10 Q So would you agree you had no adm'ssible evidence at the time that you file s pleading? + +11 A Hold on one second. + +12 Q Yes, sir. + +13 A -- this is ev Se + +14 Q What is it + +15 A In regJ Apr admission I asked + +16 Mr. Epstein --C ) + +17 Q ye + +18 19 20 admit you are moving financial assets ov utside of the direct territorial reach of the Florida courts. + +21 22 23 24 Question 22, you were making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against you in this case or similar cases. + +25 Twenty-three, do you currently have the + +MR. LINK: Yes. + +1 2 3 ability to post a \$15 million bond to satisfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty? + +4 Q Uh-huh. + +6 7 8 9 10 A If he told the truth, he would have said yes. And that is what the adverse inference requireme allows for us to draw when he says in respons t ose direct requests for admissions that he's • his Fifth Amendment right against self-incr min tion, which is tantamount to an admission. So is evidence. + +11 12 Q Okay. So you think adverse inference -- + +13 A That's going t,.e 1 p n in this case, too. + +14 15 • Hang on. J.at m just understand. make sure I + +16 17 18 19 20 21 You when you filed this that having an dverse inference to a question whatever qu tion you asked -- because he raised the Fi 'mita? tanding of an adverse inference in federal es it an admission? That's your + +22 23 A I had an admission by Mr. Epstein in response to his question. + +24 25 Q That was it? You told me he pled the Fifth and didn't answer. All I'm asking is, was it your + +1 2 3 belief that at the time in federal court that an adverse inference based on raising a Fifth Amendment privilege is an admission of your question? + +4 A If his answer to that -- + +6 7 8 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. The question about what Mr. ' belief was is clearly a question that invades the 46 4luir work-product privilege. + +9 MR. LINK: Okay. Fair enough + +10 BY MR. LINK: + +11 12 13 14 15 Q But the only evidenc d that you can point to was your asking Mr t n a question that he raised his constitut ivilege to and that ASIS" you considered that ad ssion for purposes of federal court? 4ic;7l 'e + +16 17 18 19 20 MR. : Pardon me. That's comp ou can ask him what the evidence u cannot ask him what he considered. C5h he considered is an operation of his ind, and that is protected work product. + +21 SY MR. LINK: + +22 23 24 Q Do you remember on September 29, 2009, writing a memo saying it would be really nice if we can find evidence of a transfer? + +25 A Show it to me. I will see it. + +(::) S" + +C + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 A was on the airplane with Jeffrey Epstein and an underaged girl. Jeffrey Epstein makes the allegation in the complaint that the proof that Brad was pumping a Ponzi scheme is that he sought flight logs, despite knowing that there were no underaged girls on the airplane. Jeffrey Epstei new that to be false, because there were indeed ag d girls on the airplane. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 0 To the extent that Jeffrey Ep tei himself won't say that I knowingly filed t alse allegation, could • know that t z5 Jeffrey Epstein knew that t a false allegation, because I t c n the airplane and so was this underaged g , syd he knew that. + +15 16 17 18 19 So at e t e that he filed this complaint, he new at it was false, the allegatio that he was making, which allegedly forme he asis of his assertion that I was in n a Ponzi scheme. + +20 Okay. + +21 You lost me, but I'm not going + +22 A Read it back. I think it makes sense. + +23 Q I'm not going to try to figure that out. + +24 25 Do you have anyone that can testify about what was in Mr. Epstein's mind in December 2009 at + +1 2 the time that the lawsuit was filed about why he filed it? + +3 A Mr. Epstein testified to that. + +4 6 7 • Other than Mr. Epstein, do you have any witnesses that are going to testify about the reasons why Mr. Epstein made the decision to file the lawsuit? + +8 9 ACe 'i A No. It's very obvious why he fi lawsuit. + +10 11 • You have no other witnes ther than Mr. Epstein, correct? + +12 13 14 15 A We have attempted his attorneys' depositions and they ha ejected that opportunity. So he n itnesses that can testify as to what was i Allil 's ind le at that time. + +16 17 Q You re t e plaintiff in the counterclaim, right? + +18 W. will see how this unfolds, right? + +19 20 21 22 23 24 Let me just wrap this up, because you have me a lot of information to which I think are mple questions. Do you have a witness that will testify, other than Mr. Epstein, about what was in his mind in December 2009 about why he brought the lawsuit? + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Direct evidence or + +circumstantial evidence or both? + +THE WITNESS: Let me think about that question. About why he brought the lawsuit. Specifically that. + +MR. LINK: Can you read back the question for him, please? + +I won't take that as coaching at In any event, well done. But I don't you heard my question. + +Can you read it back? + +(Thereupon, the requea rtion of the record was read b he reporter as above duly re + +Mr. Epstein n . Ali ,ll"e + +BY MR. LINK: + +Q hank you. + +y was Bill Berger added to the witness 11.01:fSie night? + +You will have to ask somebody other than self. + +THE WITNES\$r A itness other than + +Q Do you know what Mr. Berger -- why he's listed as an expert in this case? + +A Again, that's a question for the lawyers. + +Q Do you know when Mr. Berger agreed to \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd11146f6b4ab53cbb4454b9bc3adcd7dc068e67 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940/EFTA02764940.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2027 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764940.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 44, + "chars": 53482, + "elapsed_seconds": 17.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTEL \nMOTION FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE \nFIFTH AMENDMENT ASSER \nAND APRIL 15.2 \nJBOIFt.EY EPSTEIN'S \nFF \nCTIONS REGARDING EPSTEIN'S \nFINANCIAL DISCOVERY \nEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 531.3526000976562, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 531.3526000976562, + 410.60302734375 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 410.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 546.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 546.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. \nEpstein's \n? \nocatio of the Fifth Amendment Privilege as to Financial Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 512.6587524414062, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 512.6587524414062, + 528.4924926757812 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 528.4924926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B k (-KC:ROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.624, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 371.0151672363281, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 371.0151672363281, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein's Invocation tfth Amendment Privilege as to the April 15, 2011 \nRequest to Produce", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 543.7559204101562, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 543.7559204101562, + 486.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibit D.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 136.9353790283203, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 136.9353790283203, + 99.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 99.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 344.95501708984375, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 344.95501708984375, + 541.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 541.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Financial Net Worth Adverse Inference Would Constitute Reversib rror", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 519.036865234375, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 519.036865234375, + 210.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 210.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. An Adverse Inferen hat Epstein Committed the Crimes He Was \nAccused of Commi Id Constitute Reversible Error", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Only Cited Case Supports Denial of Request", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 467.6198425292969, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 467.6198425292969, + 200.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 200.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. If any instruction is given, the jury should be instructed that it may not base its verdict \nsolely upon any adverse inference drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth \nAmendment.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 544.451904296875, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 544.451904296875, + 638.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 638.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.0661926269531, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.0661926269531, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED AMENDED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 515.304, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 515.304, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 294.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 526.3199999999999, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 526.3199999999999, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 285.92999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] EDWARDS' MOTION TO DETERMINE STATUS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGE DISCOVERY. AND APPLICABILITY OF ADVERSE INFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 321.57000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 349.5440368652344, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 349.5440368652344, + 176.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 176.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EP \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 341.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 170.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764940" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e3b54a3562d2def650b955a6a248a5bd8f119ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.md @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff; + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. L.M., individually, and + +Defendant, + +## NOTICE OF OBJECCCS)) + +Y Counterplaintiff, J. objet alII16cuments disclosed as attachments to an email delivered February 16, 2018 on the are irrelevant, and the documents co t the disclosure is untimely, the documents oper impeachment evidence. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY to all Counsel on the attached li correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +r ic S 17149ly + +m.) + +Et .2018. + +JACK OLA Flori No.: 169440 Atto E-Mail(s): isx@searcvlaw.com; and ylaw.com Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Objection +Page 2 of 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Objection +Page 3 of 3 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05828d1c51f0a764557964dadbf4aac2ca1f33b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984/EFTA02764984.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764984.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2649, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.1409301757812, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.1409301757812, + 114.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 114.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF OBJECCCS))", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 387.0291748046875, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 387.0291748046875, + 345.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 345.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764984" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbadc2c904f4d027b2133dd3adfac5ac6c1a7800 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.md @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +hereby files his Supplement to Amended Propo\ Instructions and Verdict Form, and as Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Ed d through undersigned counsel, grounds therefor states as follows: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT MENDED PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VELtCD RM + +Counter-Plaintiff hereby ad towing proposed jury instructions to his Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and rdic + +### Litigation Privilege' + +The law doe ot a w a separate lawsuit to be based on conduct that occurs in and is rel to another legal proceeding. That protection, called the "litigation privile: ot prevent the application of other remedies such as contempt of cou t oce s ins, the filing ofprofessional grievances, or prosecution for perjury, but for damages are not allowed + +In lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein alleged that engaged in discovery in the cases on behalf of L.M., E W., and Jane Doe, + +Echevarria. McCalla. Romer. & Frannier 950 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla. 2007) ("In Myers v. Hodszes, 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357 (1907), this Court recognized e principle of the litigation privilege in Florida, essentially providing legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings. In that case, involving a libel suit based on statements contained in a complaint, this Court established a qualified litigation privilege, requiring that the alleged defamatory statements be relevant to the judicial proceeding....Under our holding, once this threshold showing was met, the statements were entitled to immunity."). + +*including the noticing of certain depositions, that was improper and caused Jeffrey Epstein to spend money on attorney's fees to defend against that discovery. Jeffrey Epstein claims that these monies constitute damages that are recoverable in his independent lawsuit against [REDACTED] [REDACTED].* + +*However, if the investigation [REDACTED] [REDACTED] engaged in was [REDACTED] soundly calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence regarding any part of the claims being pursued by L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, including but not limited to their potential claims for punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein, then the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was relevant to those proceedings and is protected by absolute immunity.* + +*Thus, if you find that the discovery being taken by Bradley Edwards was relevant to the potential claims being pursued by his three clients, then you must also find that Jeffrey Epstein could not properly pursue an independent lawsuit against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to recover any claimed damages for attorney's fees, as those claims were absolutely barred by Florida's litigation privilege.* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Supplement to Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 3 of 7 + +## Jeffrey Epstein's Failure to Testify at Trial= + +The failure of Jeffrey Epstein to appear or testify as to material facts within his knowledge creates an inference that he refrained from appearing or testifying because the truth, ifrevealed, would not be favorable to him. + +C O 41.\ + +2 See Geiger v. Mather of Lakeland. Inc. 217 So. 2d 897, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968) ("It is a general rule that the failure of a party to appear or testify as to material facts within his knowledge creates an inference that he refrained from appearing or testifying because the truth, if made to appear. would not aid his contention .. . This appears to be the clear weight of authority throughout the country."). + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 4 of 7 + +# The Sword-Shield Doetrine3 + +Under Florida law, Jeffrey Epstein is not permitted Wile a civil proceeding against and then invoke a rivile e to avoid discovery on the claims made by Jay Epstein against in that civil proceeding. + +An issue you are deciding in this case is whether Jeffrey Epstein initi d continued claims against in the absence ofprobable If u find that Jeffrey Epstein was asked to provide information about wh bable cause he may have had, and rather than provide that information refused to answer relevant questions, then you are permitted, but are 4 to infer that Jeffity Epstein's answers would have been adverse to h' on and would have demonstrated a lack of probable cause. + +lee DePalma v. DePalmt 538 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) ("It is well settled in this district that a person may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the fifth amendment to avoid giving discovery, using the fifth amendment as both a `sword and a shield."). + +### **Epstein's Failure to Raise Advice of Counsel as a Defense4** + +*Jeffrey Epstein had the option in this case of claiming that, after he provided his attorney with a full and complete disclosure of all the facts known to Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney advised him to institute the civil proceeding against Bradley [REDACTED]. This defense, called "advice of counsel," would have been a complete defense to [REDACTED] malicious prosecution action.* + +*Jeffrey Epstein, however, chose not to raise this defense and failed to call any of his attorneys as a witness in support of his defense to [REDACTED] Edwards' malicious prosecution claim. The failure of Jeffrey Epstein to present testimony of his own attorneys who are within his control and who may have knowledge of facts at issue justifies an adverse inference against Jeffrey Epstein.* + +*You therefore may, but are not required to, infer that Jeffrey Epstein failed to call his attorneys because his attorneys' testimony would have been unfavorable to Jeffrey Epstein's claim that Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to initiate the civil proceeding against [REDACTED].* + +--- + +4 See Paulk v. Buczynski, 106 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958) ("As mentioned above, defendant alleged that the perjury prosecution against plaintiff was instituted upon advice of counsel. Such is a complete defense to an action for malicious prosecution; however, such advice of counsel must be based upon a full and complete disclosure of all the facts."). See Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 500 So. 2d 212, 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ("[T]he failure of a party to present the testimony of a person within his control who has knowledge of the fact at issue justifies an inference adverse to that party."); see also Haliburton v. State, 561 So. 2d 248, 250 (Fla. 1990); McLaughlin v. Union-Leader Corp., 99 N.H. 492, 498 (N.H. 1955) (affirming trial court's ruling permitting counsel to comment on the opposing party's failure to call its attorney in defense of the claims). + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 27th day of February, 2018. + +/s/ Jack Scarola + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Supplement to Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form +Page 7 of 7 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c72e94cb4f3c70b654fb25f923e2354e7a7da284 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987/EFTA02764987.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764987.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 8846, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT MENDED PROPOSED \nJURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VELtCD RM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 327.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 327.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Litigation Privilege'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 354.69793701171875, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 354.69793701171875, + 490.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 490.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein's Failure to Testify at Trial=", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 423.04559326171875, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 423.04559326171875, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Sword-Shield Doetrine3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 380.07000732421875, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 380.07000732421875, + 142.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 142.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Failure to Raise Advice of Counsel as a Defense 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764987" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8463c6b736b67005249785e7160188f7451e94b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., -11 — + +r• --4\*c: In, n ot- -c• 0 ca + +/ + +• + +## DEFENI)ANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODU61 TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAINT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant(s). + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, J. Edwards ,by and through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of • the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit J. to inspect and copy each of the following c ocuments\*: r, + +- 1. All staterr ants o e Defendant, J. M, pertaining to any of the issues in this lawstf +- 2. StaRments of any witness you intend to use at trial for impeachment. 1 documents\* including but not limited to diaries, journals, computer database materials or any other written or electronically stored information that reflect or relate to any communication to or from minor females and/or any physical contact which did or was planned to occur between you and any person who was a minor female\*\* at the time of the physical contact or planned physical contact including but not limited to any massage, fondling, or sexual + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +interaction of any kind (this should include all message pads or appointment scheduler for minor females"). + +- 4. All written documents supporting the allegations in your complaint. +- 5. All message pads, calendars of your schedule or appointments or other documents containing your "massage" appointments; and +- 6. A complete copy of each and every exhibit which yoti rintend to introduce or have considered introducing into evidence at trial. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all Don-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed thro tection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all el data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories an ers of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., ti hardware, software and d lliceluding but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It 's requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach + +&quot;minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have reason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been mished by jl— Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, th. day of 2010. + +arola + +a Bar No.: 169440 + +icy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Pho : (561) 686-6300 + +(561.9451 + +ys for J. + +[REDACTED] Jadv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Gary M. [REDACTED] Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86ceb7104dc29f78050ec9ceb9180074f353c754 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994/EFTA02764994.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764994.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4475, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENI)ANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODU61 \nTO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDAINT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.22999999999999, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 487.6520690917969, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 487.6520690917969, + 351.35302734375 + ], + [ + 124.22999999999999, + 351.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.126, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 347.238, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 347.238, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.126, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764994" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8a89eef1f4d38c1b595cf6439a748cf9d936753 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +cos + +## MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR; i,1'HEALTERNATIVE TO ADJUST THE ORDER OF PROOF + +Counter-Plaintiff J. "E amiss"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Proc 7 , hereby files this Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the er roof, and as grounds thereof states as follows: + +- 1. Trial is set to on h 13, 2018 on claim for malicious prosecution against Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The case has been special set, #1, for ten +- (10) days. +- 2. r Edwards and Epstein have been litigating this case extensively for the past eight years, and in particular have been ramping the case up for trial for the past six months. +- 3. Along with malicious prosecution case, Epstein still has a damages-only claim against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), who never defended in this action and against whom a default as to liability was entered in 2010. + +4. Rothstein is not actively represented by counsel in this case and is currently serving a substantial federal prison sentence. In fact, the US Government has recently moved to extend Rothstein's sentence to the full 50 years. Thus, Rothstein may very well never be released from prison. Regardless, it is clear that Rothstein has no assets and is not collectible in any4fashion. + +5. Epstein, through counsel, has nonetheless notified th inteiads to try his damages claim against Rothstein and that he intends to put on that s ly case first, before presentation of claim for malicious prosecution. sed this argument solely on the fact that page 10 of the parties' Joint Pre-Trial St , which contained the `State of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial', listed the d y claim against Rothstein first and the malicious prosecution claim against Eps d. The ordering was, at least from perspective, not intended to pre-deje in order of proof at trial, which is within the province of the Court. + +6. Epstein's counsel ed the undersigned that four witnesses will be called to establish his damages: Roths y deposition), L.M., (by deposition), and William Scherer. None of these wit s has any testimony remotely relevant to Epstein's non-existent damages resultin Calling th sort his damage claim is an obvious ruse to place inadmissible evidence before the jury o the only claim that really matters — the counterclaim. a Ponzi scheme in which he was not an investor and knew nothing about. + +7. Permitting the intended evidence to be offered before the same jury trying the counterclaim, puts in the untenable position of raising objections to evidence not being offered against him and appearing to be defending Rothstein. + +8. requests that the Court sever the defaulted claim from the contested counterclaim and permit malicious prosecution claim against Epstein to proceed on the March 13, 2018 trial date. Epstein's damages-only claim against Rothstein, an uncollectible defendant in federal prison, can then be set on the next available trial docket. Alter A"...ttively,the order of proof should be adjusted so that the jury may resolve the counterclaim g re ., c sidering the claim against Rothstein. + +## Memorandum of Law + +CO + +9. This Court has discretion to separately try the < nd counterclaim under Rule r to avoid prejudice may order a separate trial on any claim, crossclaim, counte o hird-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, crosscla terclaims. third-party claims, or issues."); Roseman v. Town Square Ass'n, Inc, 8. 16, 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (recognizing that viewed for abuse of discretion). I .270(b). Fla. R. Civ. P. ("The court in furtherance of co\ t a trial court's ruling to bifurcatei ..).4 + +10. Separating the necessary for a number of reasons, specifically to avoid prejudice and inconvenien wards. + +I I. F" t, ng the damages-only claim against Rothstein at the same trial as la' malicious n claim runs the substantial risk that the jury will be mislead and confused by the defau lability judgment that was entered against Rothstein for the same allegations that contends Epstein lacked probable cause to file against him. Many of these allegations claim that Rothstein ordered Epstein to engage in improper discovery or illegal activities, such as forgery, in order to fund the Ponzi scheme. Asking the jury to award Epstein damages for these claims against Rothstein based on allegations the jury is obliged to assume are true, while + +is simultaneously contending the allegations were made without probable cause and (for at least some) were knowingly false, virtually guarantees confusion on both the probable cause element and issues regarding causation. That confusion will severely prejudice in a case where his burden of proof is, as the Court mentioned at a recent hearing, a substantial one. A + +12. Second, Rothstein will not be represented at the trial and therefo ere 'll be no attorney to object or file any motions, such as a motion for directed verdict, alf. will be severely prejudiced by this fact because the jury will be aske to a damages against Epstein, while at the same time is arguing that Eps age claims are absolutely barred by Florida's litigation privilege (and because E of an investor in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme). This conundrum created yet anothe fusing the jury. + +13. Third, the parties have only case. Two of these days will likely be two of the remaining days trying a prison who will not be present s to try a legally and factually complex ury selection and opening statements. Using up nly case against an uncollectible defendant in federal ented at trial is a waste of judicial resources and could result in running time to complete his presentation of the only actual claim being litigated: the mal i rosecution claim. In fact, separating the cases will actually conserve judicial re use if the Court were to reset Epstein's damages claim against Rothstein there is v tt e likelihood that Epstein will bother to come back to the courthouse to try that separate case against an uncollectible defendant in federal prison. Trying the Rothstein case only benefits Epstein if he can use the issues to confuse the jury and introduce otherwise inadmissible evidence to a jury that is simultaneously deciding malicious prosecution claim. + +14. Fourth, Epstein's counsel has made it abundantly clear that Epstein, as a party, will neither be appearing nor testifying at trial. That fact alone renders the entire damages-only claim a nullity, as Epstein cannot possibly put forth evidence of the damages he allegedly suffered without taking the stand and testifying to those alleged damages. + +15. Finally, as the Fourth DCA recently stated, "bifurcation is gene a specific threat of inconsistent verdicts or prejudice to a party." Roseman FK. prdper absent o. 2d at 520 quoting Microclimate Sales Co., Inc. v. Doherty. 731 So. 2d 856, 858 Fla. 51 DCA 1999). There is no threat of inconsistent verdicts if the Court were to bifurca Sic) aims because Epstein's only remaining claim against Rothstein is for the damages R t'Cyi used Epstein by operating a Ponzi scheme in which Epstein did not invest. n stt.. malicious prosecution counterclaim seeks damages against Epstein in's baseless allegations labelling a co-conspirator in that Ponzi scheme. T1 a emcn s of damages are therefore completely different and stem from different facts. + +16. Thus, cs,that the Court separate the trial of Epstein's claim so that malicious prosec claim can proceed alone at the March 13, 2018 trial setting. In the alternative, Edwa s quests that the Court order that malicious prosecution claim will proceed p r keys damages-only claim against an unrepresented and uncollectible defendant so that E ar s can head off at least some of the above-mentioned prejudice. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof, as well as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just given the circumstances. + +Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1 day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e989d88e270aaba27db3b3dd910aae2da3955b2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998/EFTA02764998.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02764998.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 10211, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.41, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR; i,1'HEALTERNATIVE \nTO ADJUST THE ORDER OF PROOF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 482.6662292480469, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 482.6662292480469, + 358.10302734375 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 358.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Memorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 364.39984130859375, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 364.39984130859375, + 287.6835632324219 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 287.6835632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 119.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02764998" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e2c6dcec5ab5f8488d294954b924be748d948c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.md @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE. FIFTEENTH 'JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,:FLORIDA. + +CASENO; 502009CA040800)OOOCIABAO + +JEFEREY.EPSTERkli + +Plaintiff; + +Ve + +AO:mc + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN :individually, J. individually; an L.M., individually CO v d. + +Defendant(s). + +#### EMERGENCY VERIFIED MOTION TO 0 HAC VICE + +COMES NOW Paul G. Cassell, Movant h Verified Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.on:behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane tfully represents the following; + +- 1. ivlovant resides at Salt tak +- 2. Movant is an atto i T rofessot of law at the SI Quinney College of Law at •the University of Utah. As 4 by University of Utah regulations, Movant undertakes some private:representatio as:pgo bonoofflesentations. 3 :Mo been retained personally to, in, conjunction with other attorneys, provide le atzttion to three child sexual assault victim's of Jeffrey Epstein, who: will be ,referred. u onymously ps :L.M., E.W, and Jane Doe in connection with various Epstein- ;related litigation, including Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:011-cv-.80893-Marra (S.D. Fla); Jane Doe 1 & United States, No. 9:08-mr-80736-KAM (SD, Fla)). Movant has been + +admitted pro hac vice in both of the above-described cases and worked with other Florida attorneys in providing this representation. + +4. Movant is an active member in good standing and currently eligible to practice law in Utah (bar number 6078). + +5. There are no disciplinary proceedings against Movant. + +6. Within the past five (5) years, Movant has not been subject to any disciplinary proceedings. + +7. Movant has never been subject to any suspension proceedings. + +8. Movant has never been subject to any disbarment proceedings. + +9. Movant, either by registration, withdrawal, or othprts e, never has terminated or attempted to terminate Movant's office as an attome disciplinary, disbarment, or suspension proceedings. Ac ci to avoid administrative, + +10. Movant is not an inactive mem orida Bar. + +11. Movant is not now and has Ai ....."been a member of The Florida Bar. + +12. Movant is not a suspendedTimm ' er of The Florida Bar. + +/ 13. Movant is not a di erre)! member of The Florida Bar nor has Movant received a disciplinary resignation frore,,m,Florida Bar. + +14. Movant has not previously been disciplined or held in contempt by reason of misconduct corimitted while engaged in representation pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administfatio0-2.510. + +15. Local counsel of record associated with Movant in this matter is Attorney Jay Howell, a member of the Florida Bar who has represented L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, and maintains his practice in Jacksonville, Florida. + +16. Movant has read the applicable provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510 and Rule 1-3.10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and certifies that this verified motion complies with those rules. + +17. Movant agrees to comply with the provisions of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and consents to the jurisdiction of the courts and the Bar of the State of Florida. + +WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully requests permission to appear in this court for this cause only. + +DATED this 5 day of March, 2018. + +STATE OF Utah ) +COUNTY OF Salt Lake ) ss + +I, Paul G. Cassell, do hereby swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that I am the Movant in the above-styled matter; that I have read the foregoing Motion and know the contents thereof, and the contents are true of my own knowledge and belief. + +![]()The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5th day of March, 2018, by Paul G. Cassell, who is personally known to me or who has produced self-knowledge as identification and who did/did not take an oath. + +![]()![](_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg) + +![]()NOTARY PUBLIC + +![]()SEAL + +I hereby certify that this Emergency Verified Motion To Appear Pro Hac Vice was filed electronically in compliance with Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.515 and 2.516(e) and furnished via e-serve to the attorneys listed on the Service List below, and a copy was sent to The Florida Bar, 651 E. Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399 along with a check made payable to The Florida Bar in the amount of \$250.00 for the fee, via Federal Express, this 7 day of March, 2018. + +Respectfully Submitted, + +JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES + +![]()Jay [REDACTED] +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 (904) 680-1238 (Fax) +E-Mail: [jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Attorney for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +**Service List:** + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[mep@searcylaw.com](mailto:mep@searcylaw.com) +[jsx@searchlaw.com](mailto:jsx@searchlaw.com) +[scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] + +Nichole J. Segal +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 +444 West Railroad Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jhs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:jhs@FLAppellateLaw.com) +[kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] + +![]()Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law +University of Utah +383 S. University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) +*Attorney for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe* + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com) +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com) + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[marc@nuriklaw.com](mailto:marc@nuriklaw.com) +*Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein* + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +### RULE 2.510.FOREIGN ATTORNEYS + +(a) Eligibility. Upon filing a verified motion with the court, an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of another state and currently eligible to practice law in a state other than Florida may be permitted to appear in particular cases in a Florida court upon such conditions as the court may deem appropriate, provided that a member of The Florida Bar in good standing is associated as an attorney of record. In determining w ether to permit a foreign attorney to appear pursuant to this rule, the court may consider ong other things, information provided under subdivision (b)(3) concerning disciplin ther jurisdictions. No attorney is authorized to appear pursuant to this rule if the a (1 s a Florida resident, unless the attorney has an application pending for admissi i e Florida Bar and has not previously been denied admission to The Florida Etar, (2) • me ber of The Florida Bar but is ineligible to practice law; (3) has previously been or held in contempt by reason of misconduct committed while engaged in represen pursuant to this rule provided, however, the contempt is final and has not re ed or abated; (4) has failed to provide notice to The Florida Bar or pay the filin uired in subdivision (b)(7); or (5) is engaged in a "general practice" before Flori ci te or purposes of this rule, more than 3 appearances within a 365-day period ns• tier s representations-shall be presumed to be a "general practice." In cases involvi Jac 'n " • e clients, the court may waive the filing fee for good cause shown. + +(b) Contents of Verified Motion. A fort utilized by the foreign attorney. The veri \don accompanies this rule and shall be required by subdivision (a) shall include: + +(1) a statement identifying all j standing and currently eligible to numbers; which the attorney is an active member in good including all assigned bar numbers and attorney + +(2) a statement identifyi state courts in whic whether such admi ate, case name, and case number all other matters in Florida vice admission has been sought in the preceding 5 years, and was granted or denied; + +(3) a s manner in pending nature of the g all jurisdictions in which the attorney has been disciplined in any ing 5 years and the sanction imposed, or in which the attorney has iplinary proceeding, including the date of the disciplinary action and the olation; + +(4) a statement identifying the date on which the legal representation at, issue commenced, and the party or parties represented; + +(5) a statement that all applicable provisions of these rules and the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar have been read, and that the verifiedmotion complies with those rules; + +(6) the name, record bar address, and membership status of the Florida Bar member or members associated for purposes of the representation; + +(7)a certificate indicating service of the verified motion upon all counsel of record in the matter in which leave to appear pro hac vice is sought and upon The Florida Bar at its Tallahassee office accompanied by a nonrefundable \$250.00 filing fee made payable to The Florida Bar or notice of the waiver of the fee; and + +(8)a verification by the attorney seeking to appear pursuant to this rule and the signature of the Florida Bar member or members associated for purposes of the representation. + +04 + +# Lawyer Regulation + +#### Rules Regulating The Florida Bar + +1 GENERAL + +1-3 MEMBERSHIP + +## RULE 1-3.10 APPEARANCES BY NON-FLORIDA LAWYERS IN A FLORIDA COURT + +### RULE 1-3.10. APPEARANCE BY NON-FLORIDA LAWYER IN A FLORIDA COURT + +(a) Non-Florida Lawyer Appearing in a Florida Court. A practicing lawyer of another state, in good standing and currently eligible to practice, may, upon association of a member of The Florida Bar verified motion, be permitted to practice upon such conditions as deems appropriate under the circumstances of the case. Such comply with the applicable portions of this rule and the of Judicial Administration. + +44:c k (1) Application of Rules Regulating The FloriNar: Lawyers permitted to appear by this rule shall be subjec Rules Regulating The Florida Bar while engaged in the resentation. + +(2) General Practice Prohibited. Non-Florida lawyers shall not be permitted to engage in a general practice before Florida courts. For purposes of this rule more than 3 appearances within a 365-day period in separate representations shall be presumed to be a "general practice." + +(3) Effecf of Professional Discipline or Contempt. Non-Florida lawyers who have been disciplined or held in contempt by reason of misconduct committed while engaged in representation that is permitted by this rule shall thereafter be denied admission under this rule and the applicable provisions of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration. + +(b) Lawyer Prohibited From Appearing. No lawyer is authorized to + +appear pursuant to this rule or the applicable portions of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration if the lawyer. + +- (1) is disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction; +- (2) is a Florida resident; +- (3) is a member of The Florida Bar but ineligible to practice law; +- (4) has previously been disciplined or held hi contempt by reason of misconduct committed while engaged in representation permitted pursuantfto this rule; +- (5) has failed to provide notice to The Florida Bar or pay the filing fee as required by this rule; or +- (6) is engaged in a "general practice" as defined this rule. +- (c) Content of Verified Motion for e tppear. Any verified motion filed under this rule oK applicable provisions of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration e: +- (1) a statement identifying till jurisdictions in which the lawyer is currently eligible to practice law; +- (2) a statetnentilealifying by date, case name, and 02 CP number all other matters in Flofidastate courts in which pro hac vice admission has been sought in the preoxlitij5 years, and whether such admission was granted or denied; +- (3) a statement identifying all jurisdictions in which the lawyer has been disciplined in any manner in the preceding 5 years and the sanction imposed, or all jurisdictions in which the lawyer has pending any disciplinary proceeding, including the date of the disciplinary action and the nature of the violation, as appropriate; + +- (4) a statement identifying the date on which the legal representation at issue commenced and the party or parties represented; +- (5) a statement that all applicable provisions of this rule and the applicable provisions of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration have been read and that the verified motion complies with those rules; +- (6) the name, record bar address, and membership status of the Florida Bar member or members associated for purposes of the representation; +- (7) a certificate indicating service of the verified motion upon all counsel of record in the matter in which leave to appear pro hac vice is sought and upon The Florida Bar at its Tallahassee office accompanied by a nonrefundable \$250.00 filing fee made payable to The Florida Bar or notice of the waiver of the fee; and +- (8) a verification by the lawyer seeking to appear pursuant to this,ruler the applicable provisions of the Florida Rules of Judicial Arinistration and the signature of the Florida Bar member or members ed for purposes of the representation. + +[Updated: 01-01-2006 ] + +O2005 The Florida Bar + +http://www.floridabar.org/di \*Ttfb.ns£(FV/7D7ITB2F8EA1CD0885256B11C005AEA99 2/6/2006 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72072d1d53c07da28af6e27646ca7793e1b948d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/EFTA02765005.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,558 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 13892, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.01, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE. \nFIFTEENTH 'JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,:FLORIDA.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 516.9053955078125, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 516.9053955078125, + 103.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 103.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMERGENCY VERIFIED MOTION TO 0 HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 473.6949157714844, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 473.6949157714844, + 346.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 346.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE RE: E-FILING AND E-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 62.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 351.53999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULE 2.510.FOREIGN ATTORNEYS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 267.6861572265625, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 267.6861572265625, + 117.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 117.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lawyer Regulation", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 199.23910522460938, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 199.23910522460938, + 67.8798828125 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 67.8798828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rules Regulating The Florida Bar", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 259.0275573730469, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 259.0275573730469, + 96.363037109375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 96.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULE 1-3.10 APPEARANCES BY NON-\nFLORIDA LAWYERS IN A FLORIDA COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 379.8912658691406, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 379.8912658691406, + 170.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 170.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULE 1-3.10. APPEARANCE BY NON-FLORIDA \nLAWYER IN A FLORIDA COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 407.27001953125, + 180.63 + ], + [ + 407.27001953125, + 214.863037109375 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 214.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765005" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4c92bbe7d5b66b449c4a3390fe81a95274aff2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765005/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7a61f0da7db79c1e5ee3ff7ec212fa821b810bb540e5f74bf68db70b5e6ebadc +size 16959 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2f41dee0e4950d633c2a6a87b78e5fd1d351306 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.md @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +**UNOPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO +TEMPORARILY SEAL EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF UNREDACTED MATERIALS** + +Sexual assault victims L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the three victims"), proceeding pseudonymously and through undersigned counsel and having previously filed an unopposed motion to intervene in this action, hereby file this Unopposed Emergency Motion to Temporarily Seal Epstein's Notice of Unredacted Materials, and in support states as follows: + +As the Court is aware from previous pleadings filed in this case, on the evening Friday, March 2, 2018, counsel for Jeffery Epstein filed Epstein's Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to ██████████' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (hereinafter "Notice of Unredacted Materials"). That "Notice" included as an exhibit a series of emails over which ██████████ (on behalf of his clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, the three victims who bring this motion) had asserted protections of various types. The three victims have asserted - and are continuing to assert - that these communications are privileged or otherwise protected from public disclosure. + +Epstein filed that Notice of Redacted Materials in the public court file. Despite repeated requests from botha' counsel and the victims' counsel, he has refused to place the materials under seal until the Court can determine whether the materials should be made public or not. + +Accordingly, to protect their interests in the confidentiality of the materials, the victims move to temporarily seal the Notice of Unredacted Materials until the Court has made a determination as to whether the materials are protected or not. + +The victims' motion to temporarily seal is unopposed, as both Ed ASid Epstein's counsel (previously contacted) have agreed to it. + +This motion is an "emergency" motion, because the t i eks to seal materials which the Court will consider at the hearing the Court h ed for Thursday, March 8, 2018, where the confidentiality of these materials w. The d. Moreover, every minute that passes without the materials being sealed raise 'h Nibility that the victims' confidentiality interests will be compromised. + +For the foregoing reasons,-?iet rt should grant the three victims' unopposed emergency motion to temporaril)d seal EA. Notice of Unredacted Materials. + ++6\ + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of March, 2018. + +c.,--- • + +WELL Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 (904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL Quinney College of University of Utah 383 S. Universit, Utah Bar No.: 607 Salt Lake CN 41 2 Pro Ha M ion Pending (801) 5r4; + +c \* ) Sr LM., E.W., and Jane Doe + +This daytime business address and telephone number is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the. University of Utah. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@scarcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@scarcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c841b7942a49fed069828780002ce9885182df1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015/EFTA02765015.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765015.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4558, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 520.2, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 520.2, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 296.20799999999997, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNOPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO TEMPORARILY SEAL EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF UNREDACTED MATERIALS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 506.73599999999993, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 506.73599999999993, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 354.78000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765015" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42beff8e4c6847fed4cc60773437edc5de1d1e1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.md @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EP [REDACTED], + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO JOIN +MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR RELATED RELIEF + +Sexual assault victims L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the three victims"), proceeding pseudonymously and through undersigned counsel, having previously filed an (unopposed) motion to intervene, hereby file this Emergency Motion to Join in [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log, for related relief, and in support states as follows: + +As the Court is aware from recently-filed pleadings, on the evening of Friday, March 2, 2018, counsel for defendant Epstein filed a Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to [REDACTED] Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (hereinafter "Notice of Unredacted Materials"). That "Notice" included as an exhibit a series of emails over which [REDACTED] (on behalf of his clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, the three victims who bring this motion) had properly asserted + +confidentiality protections of various types. Epstein filed that Notice of Redacted Materials and the accompanying emails — in the public court file. On Monday, March 5, 2018, filed a Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on =1 1 Privilege Log (hereinafter "Motion to Strike"). The Motion to Strike generally asserted that Epstein was improperly disclosing privileged materials and asked to have all the materials n and precluded from us in the upcoming trial. (MS III + +The three victims, having previously filed an (unopposed) motion to intervene in this matter, now join motion to strike for all the reasons 1 cs ? s 1§ also now provide additional arguments in support of Ed I=. request that the Court: (1) preclude any use t to them during the upcoming trial; (2) require 11:4cCI • ( , ounsel identify how they came into possession of the privileged materials; (3) r Ep in's counsel pay reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses caused by the imprope e of these materials, including fees and expenses to the victims' counsel; and (4) er appropriate relief. The victims will seek to raise lated therein. The victims nested relief, specifically leged exhibits or any reference these arguments at the head arch 8, 2018, rendering this motion an "emergency" motion. + +## To Protect the In ests o the Three Victims, The Court Should Preclude Any Use of the exhibits or the Underlying Information Therein + +At is information derived therefrom — that are contained on a privilege log provided by e the Court is whether Epstein may make use of various emails — and to Epstein's lawyers on February 23, 2011 — more than seven years ago. See Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Filing of Privilege Log of =, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman Dated February 23, 2011 in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant and Sanctions (privilege log dated February 23, + +2011, filed with the Court on April 10, 2012).1 And yet, on March 2, 2018, Epstein's counsel filed in the public court file some of those very same emails. + +It is clear beyond dispute that many of these emails on the 2011 privilege log contain privileged attorney-client communications. To provide one straightforward illustration, consider an email on April 27, 2009, between the victims' attorney, J. and attorney Mark Nurik — was revealed in Epstein's recent March 2 filing at Exhibit C, page IA tIItifying , email by number 1527). That email quotes anticipated statements e the three victims. Id. ("she will say ... [recounting anticipated testimony]."). 2ins s is j attorney-client protected material. + +As another straightforward illustration, consider an ctober 23, 2009, between the victims' attorney, J. , and other a stos' et al.) — again revealed in Epstein's recent March 2 filing at Exhibit C, pa \ ' ifying email by number 8131). The email recounts conversations from th ee ims. Id. ("I called all the clients and . . . [recounting information provided by the victi s])." + +7- ' / Again, to be clear, both of these emails are on a privilege log provided to Epstein more ', \_ than seven years ago. + +It would be/obvious on the face of these emails that they concern attorney-client communication& regarding confidential subjects that were not intended to be disclosed. Indeed, + +2To avoid further disclosure of the confidential communication, the substance of the conversation is not recounted here, but can be determined by the Court from looking at Epstein's quotation of the document. To be clear, victims' counsel in no way intend to waive any privilege over this communication. + +3Again, to avoid further disclosure of the confidential communication, the substance of the conversation is not recounted here, but can be determined by the Court from looking at Epstein's quotation of the document. To be clear, victims' counsel in no way intend to waive any privilege over this communication. + +The privilege log is attached as the first exhibit to recent Motion to Strike. + +other emails that Epstein has disclosed concern sexual events of the then-minor victims. See, e.g., Epstein's March 2 filing at Exhibit C,,page 1 (identifying email by number 1527) (discussing communications involving sexual abuse of then-minor girls). And to be clear, it is not just direct communications between a lawyer and his clients themselves that is protected by the attorney-client privilege, but many other related communications as well. See Fla. Stat. § 90.502(c)(1) (protecting disclosures "in furtherance of the rendition of legal se to the client"); Motor Co. v. , 997 So. 2d 1148, 1153 (Fla.-5th DCA 2008) (attorney-client privilege "protects confidential communications betweefil ta\uwer and client, as well as third persons to whom disclosure is in furtherance of thesanditicia-Of legal services and those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the conuturnic itothill. + +Epstein seems to believe that there has been some fort of waiver over these obviously protected attorney-client communications (and 'initiations kations "in furtherance of the rendition of legal services"). But properly rte rotection over all of the communications at issue here by filing a privilege log. t at int, substantial protections existed — protections that Epstein was obligated to h e attorney-client privilege is the oldest confidential communication at commo and . . . is traditionally deemed worthy of maximum legal protection." Nova \$oiitheastern Univ., Inc. v. Jacobson, 25 So. 3d 82, 86 (Ha. 4th DCA 2009). ' N And "[t]he attorney-client privilege is inviolate as to matters within its scope, and waiver of the attorney-elienprivilege is not favored in Florida." Markel Am. Ins. Co. v. Baker, 152 So. 3d 86, 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). + +In order to find waiver, there must be a "clear, intentional waiver of the privilege . . . ." Id. As provided by Fla. Stat. § 90.507, it is only the "voluntary disclosure by the holder of the privilege [which] will waive the privilege. The consideration underlying this statute is the wellsettled notion that the privilege is held by the client, and protects the client." Abamar Hons. & Dev., Inc. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc., 698 So. 2d 276, 278 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997). And, most important for present purposes, "[i]f a party seeks to compel the disclosure of documents that the opposing party claims are protected by attorney-client privilege, the party claiming the privilege is entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the trial court prior to disclosur . . . If the parties disagree as to the scope of the privilege waiver, a trial court must deline scope of the waiver before it may compel discovery of information." 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). v. Har o. 3d 705, + +Epstein's counsel short-circuited all of those protectio ap priate court review when they publicly filed documents over which the victims C' u eir attorney) had properly asserted privilege. And Epstein's counsel publicly Aft d iff protected documents at a time when it would obviously be up to Epstein to ca ittsb " en of proof of showing waiver. See, e.g., Hask Co. v. Georgia Pacific Corp., 6 o.24 7 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) ("When a privilege is facially apparent, the burden is on eking disclosure to show that the privilege does C not apply."). + +Motion to-Strike makes clear how Epstein's public filing violated numerous orders of this Court uding scheduling orders requiring advance production of materials to the opposing sid ictims would add to these violations the fact that the Florida Rules of Professio uct contain rules requiring attorneys to respect the rights of third persons. See Ha. R. Prof. Conduct 4-4.4 (Feb. 1, 2018). In particular, the Rules of Professional Conduct require that "[i]n representing a client, a lawyer may not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person or knowingly use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person." Id. Here, Epstein's counsel + +have clearly used means that "have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person" — specifically, filing in the public court file materials that were obviously confidential attorney-client protected materials or, at the very least, materials over which it was obvious attorney-client protections were incontestably being asserted. Lest there be any doubt about the bad faith of Epstein's counsel, attorneys for both and the victims repeatedly notified Epstein's counsel that the public court filing was improper4 — and yet Epsteiteirnsel took no steps to prevent the damage by immediately placing the filings under,aeal aril the Court 143/ had ruled on the issues in dispute. + +Moreover, the victims are prejudiced by Epstein's late d' ure at he will attempt to use 111 itemized emails — many of which contain sensitt n ed information about the victims — just six business days before the trial .5 By f g this issue after this litigation had spanned about 100 months, Epstein has victims to litigate this issue on an "emergency" basis. + +The solution to these problems- all ctftated by Epstein and his multiple sets of law firms that have handled his interests aloft way — is to preclude Epstein from making any use of the belatedly-disclosed emails arry information derived therefrom that discloses attorney-client i"' privileged informal' Give Epstein's vast resources — and the large number of legal teams .. Nr representing hitt at'arious points in the case — Epstein should not be heard to complain that he ",..4....",...) has inadequate. pportunity to raise these issues before. Instead, as explains in his + +4 For proof of this point, the victims would simply direct the Court to their letter and related emails to Epstein's counsel, attached as exhibits to Epstein's Motion to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents (filed Mar. 6, 2018). + +5 Of the 111 emails jakaggin's summary chart, at least 49 of the emails are privileged and designated as such on 2011 Privilege Log. The remaining 62 emails were turned over as Attorneys Eyes Only or otherwise. Because of Epstein's last-minute filing, victims' counsel are continuing to review the relevant materials and reserve the right to make additional objections. + +Motion to Strike, it appears that the late disclosure is Epstein's effort "to either conduct trial by ambush or sufficiently muddy the waters to request yet another continuance." Mot. to Strike at 1. And equally important are the victims' interests. After having suffered sexual abuse at the hands of Epstein, the victims should not have to endure the further indignity of having their private communications with their attorneys paraded through the public court file — and then later through testimony in what appears to be likely to be a high-publicized trial. The door should simply hold that Epstein is not entitled to disclose any of their emails over which ection was x properly asserted — or information derived therefrom (which could set\* tO`unplicitly disclose the nature of the communications) — in the upcoming trial. + +### The Court Should Require Epstein's Counsel Explain Ho e into Possession of the Privileged Material + +The Court should also require Epstein's co nsekto d close to the victims how he came into possession of their confidential and privil m rials. The victims have most assuredly never consented to have their lawyers' ,private-communications provided to Epstein — the man who sexually abused them. And xpfititned at length by Mr. in his Motion to Strike, did not disclose them. So question then naturally arises: How did Epstein's lawyers obtain them? + +The victi ha \ tkira compelling interest in learning who has viewed their confidential attorney-die ged information. The victims have repeatedly asked Epstein's counsel to explain ho they obtained this confidential information. If the victims understand Epstein's counsel's position correctly, counsel initially claimed that had released the emails to them directly by handing over to them a disk containing these materials. See Notice of Unredacted Materials at 2 (suggesting that released the documents to Epstein). As explains in detail in his Motion to Strike, this claim is simply untrue. See Mot. to Strike at 6-13 (detailed time line with supporting exhibits proving that the privileged emails were never disclosed to Epstein by M. Confronted with fact that their initial theory is contradicted by all the documentary evidence, now it appears that Epstein's counsel are taking the position that they somehow simply recently found a disk among.Epstein materials maintained by the law firm and then "concluded the disc maintained in production that Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Do 2018) (emphasis added) (hereinafter "Mot.. to Declare Relevance").6 I files repres nted the testified about [having previously provided to Epstein 6 (Mar. 5, undantly clear that Epstein's counsel's uninformed and speculative "conclusion" A t it rrect. See generally 'alts Motion to Strike at 2-6. So the obvious question remains. w ly did these confidential and sensitive materials came into poce•Pgsion of Epstei Sic, ' legal counsel? c m + +A The Court should require Epstein — s re " sented before this Court by the law firm of Link and Rockenbach - to prompt! s t vi e victims with an explanation of the disk's provenance. Of course, Epstein can v laim of confidentiality in this inquiry. This is a disk containing the victims' outo dential materials which, according to Epstein, was supposedly voluntarily pro victims' counsel to Epstein. The victims remain extremely concerned that the was o r in ed in an improper or inappropriate way, and that other persons + +6 Epstein' 1. so asserts that, in the Razorback litigation, the documents in question "appear t a produced without confidentiality and with a waiver of any work product protection. p in Mot. to Declare Relevancy at 4. But Epstein provides no supporting evidence for s assertion, or indeed an evidence of any production to anyone that was unprotected, in the Razorback litigation or any other litigation for that matter. Epstein's unsupported speculation about what "appears" to him to have occurred can hardly constitute the specific evidence of an "intentional" waiver that would be required to pierce the attorney-client privilege. Cf. First Union Nat Bank of Fla. v. Whitener, 715 So. 24 979, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). (rejecting finding of waiver by bankruptcy trustee where the trust "specified that this production should not be construed as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, thereby evincing its intent to otherwise claim the privilege"). + +may have viewed materials concerning the victims' sexual abuse — materials that, of course, appear to identify them by name. All the victims want to know is how did that disk find its way to Epstein and who saw it along the way. + +The concerns that Epstein may have acted improperly with regard to obtaining these materials must be assessed against the backdrop of Epstein's criminal conduct — and his improper conduct within the legal system. As the Court is well aware, Epstein iII-no a lawabiding citizen but, to the contrary, someone who ran a significant sex organization leading to the abuse of dozens and dozens of minor girls. See general! ' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Summary Judgment Motion (Sep The victims will not belabor the point before this Court, other than to say tha c h one person who has both an overriding motive and opportunity to improperly o ilsi i dential materials about them, it is their sexual abuser — convicted sex offender E + +Moreover, within the legal pro E in and his co-conspirators have violated ordinary rules of civil discovery. Fo x , members of Epstein's criminal conspiracy have evaded legitimate discovery atte as dodging depositions. See id. at 21-23 (describing efforts to depose Ghislaine ell and Jean Luc Brunel). And while impeding legitimate discovery efforts, Fein (t ugh his attorneys) has engaged in questioning of victims so savage that it Offender 2010). headlines. See id. at 24 (citing Jane Musgrave, Victims Seeking Sex See Painful Pasts Used Against Them, Palm Beach Post News, Jan. 23, + +In addition, Epstein has harassed witnessed against him. For example, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida drafted an indictment against Epstein for conduct related to intimidating a witness. Id. at 31. And Epstein sent a defense investigator to harass Jane Doe shortly before her civil trial was to start. Id. And, of course, Epstein has vast resources with which to pursue a vendetta against his victims. + +Against this backdrop, Epstein's thus-far unexplained possession of confidential and attorney-client privileged emails takes on a sinister tone. The victims do not want to assume the worst. All the victims want is for Epstein to explain where he got these highly confidential materials. Epstein suffers no prejudice from such a directive, and the Court should promptly enter an order to that effect. + +# Epstein Should Be Required to Pay Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and E 'Ss-to/ithe Victims' Caused by the Improper Disclosure of Protected + +Epstein's improper public disclosures have led to the needing legal counsel to protect their confidentiality interests in this case. Thi rt hould accordingly award the victims' reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses a th protecting their interests against Epstein's blatant public revelation of materials( olv g their sexual abuse as minor girls) fully protected on a properly-filed privilege lo + +# The Court Should r Remedies as May be Appropriate + +The Court should also e victims all other remedies as may be appropriate. Epstein's counsels' br• en fi g f obviously-protected confidential materials in the public court docket — and the failure to place those materials under seal — raises difficult issues. The three vi still searching for remedies that they could pursue to put the "cat back in + +On Tuesday, March 6, 2018, Epstein's counsel filed a notice with the Court that they did not oppose the victims' filing of a motion to place the documents under seal. But as Epstein's counsel were well aware, the victims were not recognized as parties in the case and the logistical requirements of securing legal counsel, filing a motion to intervene, and then filing a motion to seal — and obtaining a ruling on such a motion — would require substantial additional time. Epstein has offered no reason whatsoever for his failure to promptly correct his disclosure of confidential materials before the Court had an opportunity to consider the issues by simply temporarily sealing the materials. + +the bag." Cf. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995) (discussing the "cat out of the bag" problem, such as the need to protect against irreparable injury caused by release of material "protected by privilege"). Accordingly, the victims respectfully ask the Court to protect them against such abuse in the legal process by taking all appropriate steps to respond to Epstein's improper disclosure of these confidential materials. + +For example, the victims request that the materials on the privilege log be litiniediately and permanently placed under seal and that Epstein not be permitted to 0 • o i use the materials in any way. In addition, given the stark disclosure of confide als before the Court had any opportunity to rule on their confidentiality — in cle fia ttof counsel's ethical and legal obligations — the victims ask the Court to admo AV in's counsel not to repeat behavior in the future. The Court should also ent i n je^, to all of Epstein's legal counsel (both past and present) "compelling the return of Ss e ev , ged materials, ordering [defendant] to return them forthwith, to destroy all cop' an make no use whatsoever of any of the materials inadvertently turned over .. n is atter absent further court order." Applied Digital Sols., Inc. v. Vasa, 941 So. 2d 40 407 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (noting trial court order providing such remedies where an attatney "received his adversaries' privileged documents, he was aware ( they were privileged.. , ancehe had failed to return them or otherwise rectify the unfair tactical advantage he obtained from the disclosure"); Constr. Sys. of Am., Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Anc118\So. 3d 942, 944 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2013) (affirming trial court order compelling return of inadvertently released privileged documents).8 And, no doubt, the Court can think of + +8 Of course, in this case the grounds for an order compelling return of the documents is even stronger, because so far as appears in the record the documents at issue were never inadvertently released but instead appear to have been inappropriately obtained. Cf. Nova Southeastern. Univ., Inc. v. Jacobson, 25 So. 3d 82, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("Florida courts do not apply a strict rule that counsel's inadvertent production alone waives the attorney-client privilege."). + +other appropriate remedies as well. The victims simply ask the Court to take appropriate steps to undo the wrong that as has been done to them by legal counsel for the man who sexually abused them — apparently as part of a continuing effort to harass and besmirch them. + +# CONCLUSION + +For all these reasons, the Court (1) preclude any use of the privileged exhibits or any reference to them during the upcoming trial; (2) require Epstein's counsel identi they came into possession of the privileged materials; (3) direct Epstein's cou reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses to the victims' caused by the improper disc c6tarb) ese materials; and (4) award all other appropriate remedies, such as immedia tu f all the privileged materials. + +"S ) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JAY HOWELL + +Jay Howell & Associates + +Florida Bar No.: 225657 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com + +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 + +Jacksonville, FL 32211 + +(904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL + +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah + +Utah Bar No.: 6078 + +383 S. University St. + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 + +(801) 585-52029 + +*Pro Hac Vice Motion Pending* + +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +--- + +9 This daytime business address and telephone number is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb396f8bcbe5ca6ddf806cdc98ee82f52d884fd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019/EFTA02765019.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,673 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765019.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 25335, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.31, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.924, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 515.304, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 515.304, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 291.924, + 111.78000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO JOIN MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR RELATED RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "To Protect the In ests o the Three Victims, The Court Should Preclude Any Use of the \nexhibits or the Underlying Information Therein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 510.2619934082031, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 510.2619934082031, + 541.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 541.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Court Should Require Epstein's Counsel Explain Ho e into Possession of the \nPrivileged Material", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 519.588, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 519.588, + 347.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 347.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Should Be Required to Pay Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and E 'Ss-to/ithe Victims' \nCaused by the Improper Disclosure of Protected", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 520.4544067382812, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 520.4544067382812, + 292.863037109375 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 292.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Court Should r Remedies as May be Appropriate", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 451.02447509765625, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 451.02447509765625, + 457.863037109375 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 457.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.72000122070312, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 167.9630126953125 + ], + [ + 246.72000122070312, + 167.9630126953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765019" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..140fdeaf61dd217d6d2a7956f19809e5d0810d58 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +## :INTHE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE :FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITON.AND FOR PALM13EACH COUNTY; FLORIDA + +CASENO.:. 502009CA04O800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN 1 6vidually, J. indiVidually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +I + +## UNOPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTIONBY JANE DOE TO INTERVENETO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY OF THEIR PRIVILEGED AND. OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIALS AND '1'O SEEK OTHER APPROPRIATE 'REMEDIES + +Cos + +Sextgil. assault victims ,II,M, E:W., Doe (hereinafter "the three victims"), proceeding, pseudonymously' and gned counsel, hereby file this Unopposed Emergeney Motion to Intervene t e Confidentiality of Their.Privileged and Protected Materials and to. Seek,Othe Approp e Remedies, and in support states as follows; + +As. the Court: ware omprevious pleadings:filed in this case, each of the three victims identified:above sexually abused as:minor girls as part of.Jeffity Epstein's abuse of dozens and dozens s in his Palm Beach mansion. See generally Statement of Undisputed'acts in, Support of Motion for Summary 'Judgment (filed Sept. 22, 2010). In particular, it appears to be uncontested that:. + +- Epsfeinbegan sexually assaultingt.M. wIten she was thirteen years old and continued to molest her on more. than fifty occasions over flute years. 14 at 5, 117. + +- Epstein also sexually assaulted E.W., beginning when she was fourteen years old and did so on numerous occasions. Id. at 5, 119. +- Another of the minor girls Epstein sexually assaulted was Jane Doe; the abuse began she was fourteen years old. Id. at 5-6, 10. + +As the Court is aware from recently-filed pleadings, on the evening of Friday, arch 2, 2018, counsel for Jeffery Epstein filed his Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendi4fupport of Response in Opposition to M' Second Supplement to Motion in ddressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (hereinafter "Notice of Unredacted M enal at "Notice" included as an exhibit a series of emails over which eha of his clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, the three victims who bring this motion aiis?1 d rted protections of various types. Epstein filed his Notice of Unredacted Mater' S ASIi ftt 'public court file. On Monday, March 5, 2018, filed a Motion to Strik p in Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference roocuments Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log. That 44froitio\n generally asserted that Epstein was improperly disclosing privileged materials. + +The three victims move to intervene in this case to protect their privileges, protections, and co ntiality interests in the materials at issue. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedu , Anyone claiming an interest in pending litigation may at any time be permitted t a right by intervention, but the intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceedings, unless otherwise ordered by the court in its discretion." It is well established law that "[i]ntervention should be liberally allowed." Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n Inc. v. Glisson, 531 So. 2d 996, 998 (Fla. Ct. App. ?DCA 1988). + +The three victims have a clear interest in this pending litigation, which involves (for example) potential disclosure of information protected by their attorney-client privilege. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 90.502(3) (recognizing attorney-client privilege, which belongs to the client). The attorney-client privilege "belongs to the client, and may be claimed by the client or the lawyer on behalf of the client." Nova Southeastern Univ., Inc. v. Jacobson, 25 So. 3d 82, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Neu v. Miami Herald Pub. Co., 462 So.2d 821, 829 1985) (internal citation omitted)). The three victims are not seeking to enlarge the (: ) • in dispute, but simply to have their positions heard with regard to a dispute that h r arisen between the parties as to the confidentiality of certain documents c ) rel information — as demonstrated by Motion to Strike. They also t ita r interest in the litigation, because they are entitled to know how Epstein o i S tS, 2eir confidential and privileged — a man who sexually abused them when they were minors. These issues ar ,c1 ....., on e subjects of the pending motion filed by ingBo materials, which should never have been disclo, see Mot. to Strike at 14 ( t s' came into possession of privilegt nate this), and the three victims have important interests in urt order that Epstein's counsel show how they the outcome of this motion. + +The victims' otion t intervene is unopposed, as both and Epstein's counsel (previously co , have agreed to it. + +is an "emergency" motion, because the three victims seeks to intervene to present arguments at the hearing the Court has scheduled for Thursday, March 8, 2018, where the confidentiality of these materials will be argued. Counsel for the victims (Mr. Cassell, who is also filing a motion for admission to the bar of this Court pro hac vice) intends to seek the Court's permission to present the victims' interests during that hearing on the privilege and related issues. + +For the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant the three victims' emergency motion to intervene in this case to protect their privileges, protections, and confidentiality interests in the materials disclosed in Epstein's Notice of Unredacted Materials. + +cos + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7ih day of March, 2018. + +WELL + +Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No:: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowelltrn o 4 ohic 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 (90) -1 234 32211 (904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL S.J. Quinney College of 4 ) University of Utah Utah Bar No.: 6078 383 S. University Salt Lake City 1 (801) 585-5 Pro Hac j.Mo36n Pending + +At LM., E.VV., and. Jane Doe + ++6s + +I This daytime business address and telephone number is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdf9107f9adf517bc4d9e40d094adfa52171683e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033/EFTA02765033.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765033.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7153, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": ":INTHE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n:FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITON.AND \nFOR PALM13EACH COUNTY; FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.536, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 517.4037475585938, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 517.4037475585938, + 112.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 292.536, + 112.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNOPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTIONBY JANE DOE TO \nINTERVENETO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY OF THEIR PRIVILEGED AND.\nOTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIALS AND '1'O SEEK OTHER APPROPRIATE \n'REMEDIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 516.0061645507812, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 516.0061645507812, + 382.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 382.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765033" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b88009e9cd060b477037209b35dde1aed6735bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: 50-2009CA040800)00O(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. + +S r • dividually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +cos + +## EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEARANCE + +The undersigned counsel, Jay C. Howell, files his notice of appearance in the above-styled case as attorney for the victims, L.M., E.W. and JANE DOE, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. + +Said attorney has been duly admitted, is in good standing, and authorized to practice law in the State.of Florida. + ++6s Respectfully submitted, + +JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES + +well, Esq ire 644 Cesery Blvd., ite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Tel: (904) 680-1234 FAX: (904)680-1238 Florida Bar No. 225657 jaseiavhowell.com + +**CERTIFICATE RE: E-FILING AND E-SERVICE** + +I hereby certify that this Emergency Notice of Hearing was filed electronically in compliance with Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.515 and 2.516(e) and furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on this 7 day of March, 2018. + +Respectfully Submitted, + +JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 225657 + 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 + Jacksonville, FL 32211 + (904) 680-1234 + (904) 680-1238 (Fax) + E-Mail: [jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) + +**Service List:** + +Jack Scarola + Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[mep@searcylaw.com](mailto:mep@searcylaw.com) +[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com) +[scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Nichole J. Segal + Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 + 444 West Railroad Avenue + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jhs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:jhs@FLAppellateLaw.com) +[kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + Pottinger LLC + 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com) +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) + +*Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff* [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law +University of Utah +383 S. University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) +*Attorney for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe* + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Angela M. Many +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack A. Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +*Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[marc@nuriklaw.com](mailto:marc@nuriklaw.com) +*Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..263a48b5839c43ab7b01dd6a33f1856755d519f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039/EFTA02765039.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765039.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3283, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.5100402832031, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 508.572, + 127.41644287109375 + ], + [ + 279.5100402832031, + 127.41644287109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 416.3761291503906, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 416.3761291503906, + 353.9164733886719 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 353.9164733886719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE RE: E-FILING AND E-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 438.804, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Service List:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 371.79 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765039" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5913c57227dc6ed3efcb22605f7fb06a96793848 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.md @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg) + +## SHARON R. BOCK + +## CLERK & COMPTROLLER PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +## RECEIPT + +2570330 + +Printed On: 03/07/2018 02:25 Page 1 of 1 + +| Receipt Number: 2570330 - Date 03/07/2018 Time 2:25PM | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------| +| Received of: | Jay C. Howell
644 Cesery Blvd., Ste. 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211 | | | +| Cashier Name: | ADMIN | Balance Owed: | 100.00 | +| Cashier Location: | E-Filing | Total Amount Paid: | 100.00 | +| Receipt ID: | 8810589 | Remaining Balance: | 0.00 | +| Division: | AG: Circuit Civil Central - AG(Civil) | | | +| Case# 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB -- PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY | | | | +| Item | Balance | Paid | Bal Remaining | +| Fees | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +| Case Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +| Payments | | | | +| Type | Ref# | Amount | | +| EFiling_CREDITCARD | 20909870 | | 100.00 | +| Total Received | | | 100.00 | +| Total Paid | | | 100.00 | + +How was your service today? We want to hear your comments or questions. Please e-mail your feedback to clerkweb@mypalmbeachclerk.com. + +For office locations and informatioh abut Clerk & Comptroller services: Visit www.mypalmbeachclerk.com or call (561) 355-2996. + +o(si \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b2fc1bb22cc677fcc3c64b67d5b34831707be45 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/EFTA02765042.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 3534, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.31, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SHARON R. BOCK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 432.9200000000001, + 87.05999999999999 + ], + [ + 632.1679077148438, + 87.05999999999999 + ], + [ + 632.1679077148438, + 112.7823486328125 + ], + [ + 432.9200000000001, + 112.7823486328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CLERK & COMPTROLLER \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 383.6, + 148.002 + ], + [ + 680.2664794921875, + 148.002 + ], + [ + 680.2664794921875, + 197.3505859375 + ], + [ + 383.6, + 197.3505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECEIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 807.7520000000001, + 64.9266357421875 + ], + [ + 948.2643432617188, + 64.9266357421875 + ], + [ + 948.2643432617188, + 97.798828125 + ], + [ + 807.7520000000001, + 97.798828125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765042" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b6244e7e9f0959047b4f5a78be20f8bb608ec7a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765042/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:656866ccf81628f39fe9f0e9e5e6a272a82ecda6f193095c556e713f42e369e6 +size 31387 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57edfeb5341376ff6294f8e135271afba0c20d94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.md @@ -0,0 +1,1581 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OO1MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN LY EPSTEIN'S CLERK'S TRIAL E I ST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E • , uant to (1) paragraph G of the Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Tri • the parties to agree to amend their Exhibit Lists, (2) the parties' December 22, 20 1\* int .ePfetrial Stipulation which provided the parties did not waive their right to amend thej4 Ili Lists, and (3) the Clerk's guidelines on pre-marking exhibits which require each e identified individually, hereby files this Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to set forth individtdlUyfhose items previously contained in general categories. + +### INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objccti +- I. All objections +- 2. All'objections, except authenticity +- 3. Irrelevant or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10-1 | N/D | Index of Appendix Items to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10A | 1/9/13 | Fourth Amended Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10B | 7/31/12 | Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to [REDACTED] Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10C | 3/23/10 | Transcript of Deposition of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10D | 12/12/11 | Excerpts of Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein - In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 09-34791 | | | | +| 10F | 12/1/09 | Information - United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 10G | N/D | Court Docket - L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | | | | +| 10H | N/D | Court Docket - E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 101-1 | 6/19/09 | Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 101-2 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 101-3 | 7/23/09 | Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 101-4 | 10/16/09 | Jane Doe's Notice That Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly and Motion for Consideration by the Court of Materials in Docket Numbers 282 and 283 in Determining Motion for Appointment of a Receiver Restraining Fraudulent Assets Transfers and Incorporated Memorandum of Law – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 101-5 | N/D | Court Docket – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10J | 3/17/10 | Transcript of Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10K | 11/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10L-1 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | | | | +| 10L-2 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal – A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | | | | +| 10L-3 | 1/13/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Lawyers from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10L-4 | 7/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Latest Rothstein Updates – 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by The Florida Bar | | | | +| 10M-1 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 10M-2 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-1 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Video Deposition of Leslie Wexler and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-2 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Glenn [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-3 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-4 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-5 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-6 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Mark Ep [REDACTED] and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-7 | 8/11/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-8 | 8/10/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10N-9 | 8/24/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-10 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-11 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-12 | 10/16/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-13 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-14 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael Sanka – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10O | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10P | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement – United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331-CR-COHN | | | | +| 10Q | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 10R | N/D | Brad Edwards Privilege Log of Emails Dated November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 10S | Misc. | Documents Produced Responsive to Order (individual items identified separately below) | | | | +| 10T | 7/24/09 | Complaint – L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092-Cohn-Seltzer | | | | +| 10U | 11/5/09 | Order - Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/[REDACTED] | | | | +| 10V | 7/29/09 | Email from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 10W | 12/12/11 | Excerpt of Transcript of Deposition of Scott Rothstein – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10X | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|----------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 11A-1 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcript of | J. | +| 11A-2 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Transcript of | J. with | +| | | 15ih | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | +| 11A-3 | 10/10/13 | Deposition Transcript of | J. (Ex. 1 | +| | | a at, 15th | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | +| 11A-3a | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3b | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Le | +| 11A-3c | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann Ma aAna | +| 11A-3d | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann | +| 11A-3e | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | Villa | +| 11A-3f | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villa L.M. | +| 11A-3g | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | t | +| 11A-3h | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | Eisenberg | +| 11A-3i | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. S t | o e Doe | +| 11A-3j | 7/9/08 | Letter from A | an lafana to Brad | +| IIA-3k | 7/9/08 | Letter from A. | ' Villafana to Brad | +| 11A-31 | 3/20/11 | Letter f | R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | +| 11A-3m | 12/10/10 | r fro | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| | | t o A. Ferrer | | +| 11A-3n | 3/22/11 | i tte from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3o | | tter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3p | 3/15/ 1 | | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Caccell | +| 11A-3q | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3r | 9/29/11 | | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | +| 11A-3s | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3t | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3u | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 11A-4 | 11/10/17 | Deposition Transcript of ██████ J. ██████ - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11B-1 | 3/17/10 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11B-2 | 1/25/12 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibit identified below) | | | | +| 11C | 6/14/12 | Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11D | 4/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of ██████ S. Adler - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11E | 5/25/11 | Deposition Transcript of Abraxas ██████ Discala with exhibits - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11F | 2/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Dean ██████ Kretschmar - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11G | 3/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Michael Legamaro - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11H | 10/12/17 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (exhibits listed as follows) | | | | +| 11H-1 | 8/7/07
8/14/07 | FBI Report – E.W. | | | | +| 11I | 12/1/17 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11J | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger - - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 12A | 12/4/10 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12B | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12C | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production | | | | +| 12D | 6/21/10 | Epstein's Request for Admissions to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12E | 7/7/10 | [REDACTED] Response to First Request for Admissions | | | | +| 12F | 4/7/11 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12G | 5/5/11 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce dated April 7, 2011 | | | | +| 12H | 5/16/11 | Epstein's Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12I | 6/10/11 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12J | 12/9/11 | Epstein's Second Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12K | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's Third Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12L | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Response to Request for Production | | | | +| 12M | 2/21/13 | [REDACTED] Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011 | | | | +| 12N | 7/25/13 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated June 25, 2013 | | | | +| 12O | 8/11/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12P | 9/5/17 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12Q | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Interrogatories | | | | +| 12R | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production | | | | +| 12S | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12T | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12U | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's Expert Interrogatories | | | | +| 12V | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce re Experts | | | | +| 12W | N/D | [REDACTED] Privilege Log – Emails November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 13-1 | 4/9/09
3:50 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (02645) | | | | +| 13-2 | 4/22/09
9:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03037) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-3 | 4/24/09
11:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ Adler to Steven Jaffe, █, William Berger, Barry █, Scott Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Carl Linder and Robert Buschel (03036) | | | | +| 13-4 | 4/26/09
7:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Radler to █ (00149) | | | | +| 13-5 | 4/27/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Marc Nurik (01527) | | | | +| 13-6 | 4/28/09
6:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Katherine Ezell (4493-4495) | | | | +| 13-7 | 5/1/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Rob to █ (00014) | | | | +| 13-8 | 5/13/09
1:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (03988-04000) | | | | +| 13-9 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (02231) | | | | +| 13-10 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to Bradley █ and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 13-11 | 5/28/09
5:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to █ (00090) | | | | +| 13-12 | 5/29/09
5:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Eric Glasser to Bradley █ (2906-2908) | | | | +| 13-13 | 6/3/09
11:47 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to █ (00133) | | | | +| 13-14 | 6/3/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Wayne Black (11237) | | | | +| 13-15 | 6/3/09
6:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Wayne Black to █ (08006) | | | | +| 13-16 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | +| 13-17 | 7/13/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to █ (00026) | | | | +| 13-18 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 13-19 | 7/14/09
2:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01004) | | | | +| 13-20 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 13-21 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to █ (02684-02685) | | | | +| 13-22 | 7/20/09
1:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01475) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-23 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05087) | | | | +| 13-24 | 8/2/09
1:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (03694) | | | | +| 13-25 | 8/3/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Beth to Carl Linder (12289) | | | | +| 13-26 | 8/3/09
7:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (01166) | | | | +| 13-27 | 8/6/09
2:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01258) | | | | +| 13-28 | 8/10/09
5:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (15113-15114) | | | | +| 13-29 | 8/10/09
5:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (00158) | | | | +| 13-30 | 8/11/09
9:26 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26481) | | | | +| 13-31 | 8/12/09
9:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein (26394) | | | | +| 13-32 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 13-33 | 8/13/09
9:51 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein (25922) | | | | +| 13-34 | 8/13/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26480) | | | | +| 13-35 | 8/13/09
5:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to Scott Rothstein (26356) | | | | +| 13-36 | 8/13/09
6:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26570) | | | | +| 13-37 | 8/21/09
4:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (00992) | | | | +| 13-38 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED]
Edwards, Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED]
(05113) | | | | +| 13-39 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED]
(05112) | | | | +| 13-40 | 8/24/09
10:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01423) | | | | +| 13-41 | 8/25/09
8:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05071) | | | | +| 13-42 | 8/26/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (01406) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-43 | 9/4/09
11:18 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul
Cassell and William Berger (02043) | | | | +| 13-44 | 9/4/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Spencer
Kuvin (03731-03732) | | | | +| 13-45 | 9/10/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to redrum
(06406-06408) | | | | +| 13-46 | 9/11/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (01686) | | | | +| 13-47 | 9/17/09
8:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Peterson (11123 - 11125) | | | | +| 13-48 | 9/17/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William
Berger (02088) | | | | +| 13-49 | 9/19/09
7:54 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Peterson (11126-11127) | | | | +| 13-50 | 9/19/09
10:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Dana
Peterson (11128-11131) | | | | +| 13-51 | 9/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Paul
Cassell (08459) | | | | +| 13-52 | 9/30/09
3:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff
(25925) | | | | +| 13-53 | 9/30/09
3:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff
(25874) | | | | +| 13-54 | 10/1/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (08348-08349) | | | | +| 13-55 | 10/1/09
1:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (08355) | | | | +| 13-56 | 10/5/09
7:16 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William
Berger (11145) | | | | +| 13-57 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 13-58 | 10/13/09
4:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala
(26094-26096) | | | | +| 13-59 | 10/13/09
5:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala
(26826-26827) | | | | +| 13-60 | 10/14/09
7:36 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul
Cassel (03191-03192) | | | | +| 13-61 | 10/14/09
9:13 a.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein
(27284) | | | | +| 13-62 | 10/15/09
6:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala
and [REDACTED] Preve (26893) | | | | +| 13-63 | 10/15/09
8:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein,
D. Von Allmen (26882) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-64 | 10/16/09
11:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Wheeler to Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (01255) | | | | +| 13-65 | 10/16/09
3:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Preve and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26836-26837) | | | | +| 13-66 | 10/17/09
1:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (04398-04402) | | | | +| 13-67 | 10/17/09
1:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassel (04408-04412) | | | | +| 13-68 | 10/17/09
4:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26807) | | | | +| 13-69 | 10/17/09
4:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26808-26809) | | | | +| 13-70 | 10/18/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (27379) | | | | +| 13-71 | 10/19/09
10:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27293) | | | | +| 13-72 | 10/19/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26021 with attachment) | | | | +| 13-73 | 10/19/09
4:32 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Preve, D. Von Allmen and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27270) | | | | +| 13-74 | 10/20/09
8:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27355) | | | | +| 13-75 | 10/20/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27325) | | | | +| 13-76 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 13-77 | 10/20/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to Chris Podaras (27322) | | | | +| 13-78 | 10/20/09
5:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Podaras to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Frank Prieve (26777-26781) | | | | +| 13-79 | 10/20/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Podaras, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Prieve (26782-26786) | | | | +| 13-80 | 10/21/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Podaras (26088-26089) | | | | +| 13-81 | 10/21/09
2:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (25998) | | | | +| 13-82 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-83 | 10/22/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain – from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27072) | | | | +| 13-84 | 10/22/09
1:48 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996) | | | | +| 13-85 | 10/22/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Podaras to Thane Ritchie, Scott Rothstein, A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (Legamaro Depo. Ex. 6) | | | | +| 13-86 | 10/23/09
11:37 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to Mark Fistos, [REDACTED] Adler, [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Scott Rothstein and Steven Jaffee (26747) | | | | +| 13-87 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 13-88 | 10/23/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (08042-08044) | | | | +| 13-89 | 10/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Scott Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26741-26742) | | | | +| 13-90 | 10/23/09
12:16 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Edwards to Matthew Weissing (08059-08061) | | | | +| 13-91 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 13-92 | 10/23/09
12:18 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott J. Rothstein to A.J. Discala and Dean Kretschmar (27522) | | | | +| 13-93 | 10/23/09
12:27 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Bradley [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26756-26758) | | | | +| 13-94 | 10/23/09
12:36 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Mark Fistos (08036-08038) | | | | +| 13-95 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-[REDACTED] chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 13-96 | 10/23/09
1:05 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Michael Legamaro (Legamaro production) | | | | +| 13-97 | 10/23/09
1:26 p.m. | E-mail chain – [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Scott Rothstein and Mark Fistos (26762) | | | | +| 13-98 | 10/23/09
1:31 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Mark Fistos and Steven Jaffe (01117) | | | | +| 13-99 | 10/23/09
1:54 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Kretschmar to Scott Rothstein (27051-27052) | | | | +| 13-100 | 10/23/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08121-08123) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-101 | 10/23/09
2:02 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED], Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26749-26752) | | | | +| 13-102 | 10/23/09
2:05 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08128-08130) | | | | +| 13-103 | 10/23/09
2:06 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] and Mark Fistos (08118-08120) | | | | +| 13-104 | 10/23/09
2:09 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08131-08133) | | | | +| 13-105 | 10/23/09
2:09 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Steven Jaffe to [REDACTED], Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] Adler (08124-08126) | | | | +| 13-106 | 10/23/09
2:10 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to [REDACTED], Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] Adler (08135-08138) | | | | +| 13-107 | 10/23/09
2:24 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to Steve Jaffe, Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Adler, Bradley Edwards and Matthew Weissing (27494) | | | | +| 13-108 | 10/23/09
2:45 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to Steven Jaffe, Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Adler, Bradley [REDACTED] and Matthew Weissing (26760) | | | | +| 13-109 | 10/23/09
3:02 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Michael Legamaro (27025) | | | | +| 13-110 | 10/23/09
3:43 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Russell Adler to Scott Rothstein (25997) | | | | +| 13-111 | 10/25/09
3:21 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (25937) | | | | +| 13-112 | 10/27/09
2:59 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Preve to A.J. Discala (26973) | | | | +| 13-113 | 10/27/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Phaedra Xanthos (26604-26605) | | | | +| 13-114 | 10/28/09
9:22 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Lea Kaplan (26737) | | | | +| 13-115 | 10/28/09
9:34 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Mike Fisten and Pat [REDACTED] (26485) | | | | +| 13-116 | 10/29/09
7:44 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Paul Cassell to [REDACTED] (07019-07021) | | | | +| 13-117 | 10/30/09
10:04 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Debra [REDACTED] (27013) | | | | +| 13-118 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 13-119 | 3/18/10
1:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Tom Hartog and Donnie | | | | +| 13-120 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-121 | 3/24/10
2:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog | | | | +| 13-122 | 4/1/10
3:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. ██████████ to Story Cowles | | | | +| 13-123 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | + +### State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein O 15111Judicial Circuit + +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. | | +|-----|---------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statemen | | +| | | provided in the matter | ff | +| 17A | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, intervi | o | +| 17B | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, ' | E.W. | +| 17C | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, int | ,o Jane Doe | + +### E " L.M . Je pstein 15th Judicial Circuit o 0-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18-1 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein] | | | | +|-------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 18-2 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and Davit Hart Rogers | | | | +| 18-3 | 8/12/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – Greens Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-4 | 8/14/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – [REDACTED] Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-5 | 8/20/09 | Ep [REDACTED] Objections to Notices of Production From Non-Parties and Incorporated Motion for Protective Order | | | | +| 18-6 | 1/23/09 | L.M.'s Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-7 | 8/4/09 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-8 | 8/29/09 | Notice of Serving Plaintiff's Supplemental Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatory Number 19 | | | | +| 18-9 | 3/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's Third Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-10 | 4/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers to Defendant's Fourth Interrogatories | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 18-11 | 4/15/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers to Defendant's Fifth Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-12 | 6/25/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Update Answers to #2 #4 and #5 of Defendant's Fourth Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-13 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'s Myspace page | | | | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1)
Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1)
Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to: | | | | +| 29A-1 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Testimony of L.M. | | | | +| 29A-2 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Testimony of L.M. | | | | + +## L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein Ir 0 . P C S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | doe! • t [all court filings referenced therein | +|----|---------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 31 | 7/24/09 | m aint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. I) | +| 32 | 7/20 | S pulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | +| 33 | | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +### E. W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | +|------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 35-1 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 35-2 | Misc. | Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum to | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended at | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Lan | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complai | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Pre' di e | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation an is ing Case | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, depositio ts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes including, t t 1* ited to: | +| 47A | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transc • o ir . | + +### Jar oe v. Jeffrey Epstein US .D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | Court d t [all court filings referenced therein | +|------|---------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | | and all di and discove res onses | +| 48-1 | 4/9/09 | P mtiff's otion to Strike References to Non | +| | | ro ution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to | +| 48-2 | /2 | Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Finn Affiliation | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 58A | 9/30/09 | Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe | | | | + +# Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffre E • in (Consolidated Action) + +### USDC S.D . Ca e No. 08-CV-80119 + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +|----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction
Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets
Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 74A-1 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 74A-2 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 74A-3 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 74B | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| 74C | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against [REDACTED] J. Edwards, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James Edwards ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to: | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 87A-I | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-2 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-3 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-4 | 12/14/11 12114/I 1 | Deposition Transcript Tran of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-5 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-6 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| | | Afternoon Session OP" | +| 87A-7 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-8 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothste' | +| 87A-9 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. It | +| 87A-10 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott 1 , — P.M. | +| 87A-11 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of S . othstein — | +| 87A-I2 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transc ' o W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-13 | 12/21/11 | Deposition T nscri Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-14 | 12/21/11 | Depositi Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| | | Afternoo ion | +| 87A-15 | 12/22/11 | sitio Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-16 | 12/22/1 | o Won Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | + +# Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler — Communication + +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | +|----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01620) | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01446) | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to Grace [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and Bradley J. Edwards (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] Martinez (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 119 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05803) | | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06968-0696) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------| +| 154 | 8/26/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 9:56 p.m. | 02269 | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 10:58 a.m. | 02895 | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09 | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to | | J. | +| | 12:54 p.m. | and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. AS | +| | 1:39 p.m. | 07612-07613 | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 6:42 p.m. | 02595-02596 | | | +| | | | | O 'S | +| 159 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 6:49 p.m. | 07614-07615 | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to Bra | | +| | 7:00 p.m. | (07605-076 | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. Edward | | | +| | 8:12 p.m. | (07607-07608) | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from Conchita S | | dley J. | +| | 10:55 p.m. | (07609-07611) | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from Bradle | s to | | +| | 11:43 a.m. | 04015 | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from C c taS | off to | J. | +| | 11:50 a.m. | 07646 | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - Y J. | to | | +| | 11:53 a.m. | Conchita Sa ff(0 ) | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - onchita | to | J. | +| | 12:04 ..m. | Edwar. 7676 7677 | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09 | E-mail c m | to | J. | +| | 1:59 p.m. | ds 674-07675 | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09 | • chain - from J. | to | | +| | 2:04 | c ita 07678-07679 | | | +| 169 | 9/8/ | E ail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 2- | wards (07684-07685 | | | +| 170 | 9/ | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 2:42 p. . | 07682-07683 | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 2:49 p.m. | 07695-07697 | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 3:25 p.m. | 07680-07681 | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 7:51 p.m. | 07686-07688 | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | 3. | +| | 7:53 •.m. | (07689-07691) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
[REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Renee/Carlos [REDACTED] (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Conchita Sarnoff (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita
Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie Johnson (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie Johnson (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in Edwards adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to Bradley J. Edwards (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for Bradley J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 242 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ with referenced articles | | | | +| 245A | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| 245B | 12/26/15 | Politico . Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| 245C | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| 245D | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| 245E | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post . Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245F | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com . Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245G | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| 245H | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review . Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| 245I | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| 245J | 6/25/15 | WCVB5 . Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 245K | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana | +| 245L | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of | +| 245M | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower | +| 245N | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| 245O | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| 245P | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| 245Q | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| 245R | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Rut ul orce | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Chan t Palm | +| 245S | 10/20/13 | calm Beach Daily Ne ewe Lawsuit Against | +| | | Epstein Expected to tim Testimony | +| 245T | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Excl iv • al Assault Victim | +| | | Alleges Abuse Youth Pastor | +| 245U | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. leva Fall Nets Woman \$13 | +| 245V | July 2012 | Dail B ' Revi w. Top Florida Verdicts & | +| | | Set emen o 2011 | +| 245W | 6/13/12 | Bus ess Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush | +| | | ri ub of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | +| 245X | 4/22/ 1 | m Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey | +| 246 | 8/10 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with | +| 246A | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected | +| 246B | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on | +| 246C | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire | +| | | Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 246D | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 246E | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| 246F | 4/23/14 | [REDACTED], Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| 246G | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion - Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Experts | | | | | | +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | + +| No. 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 | Date Misc. 9/9/16 11/30/16 Misc. 11/1/09 11/2/09 11/2/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/5/09 | Description Objection Marked Marked for Id. In Evidence his 10/20/17 Report Bernard J. Jansen in v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) 4OAA All public recur Ci Other Articles Rothstein yy Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme i ge: " and is Going into Receivership The New York Times: Fr c ations Against Florida Lawyer Set 0 ace t Return His Donations Rothstein Retur r ntemplating Suicide, Partner Says Florida Law : ks to be Dissolved Seemed od to be True F N r ' ig Funds Probe 11/6/09 dkk. w MU | +|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 297 | 1 | othstein Accomplice Still on Lam | +| 298 | 11 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et at | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article b Paul Brinkman | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder Levin's Ugly Past | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | Levin was Rothstein's Whale | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in To20~ | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein P | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Lo Former | +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former of t Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Bus al. A Year After | +| | | Rothstein. Man do s Unanswered | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida B . Sc othstein Scandal: One | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. tern Expose Details Sex. Murder, and | +| | | Corrupti ind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | F* e Year on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | al each Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| | | J. and any witnesses listed by | +| 323A-1 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| 323A-2 | Misc. | E.W.'s mugshot arrest information | +| 323A-3 | 3/17/11 | E.W.'s marriage license | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-4 | Misc. | Brent Moody's mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-5 | Misc. | Gregory Manning's mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-6 | Misc. | Property Records for 4140 N.W. 7 th Lane, Delray Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323A-7 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Moody, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-8 | N/D | Florida Corporations Division's Records for C. Moody Enterprises, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-9 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Courtney Elizabeth, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-10a | Misc. | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832; Court Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-10b | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Information | | | | +| 323A-10c | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Case File Sheet | | | | +| 323A-10d | 2/19/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Notice of Appearance, Waiver of Arraignment, Plea of Not Guilty, Demand for Discovery and Demand for Trial | | | | +| 323A-10e | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Judgment and Sentencing | | | | +| 323A-10f | 1/10/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Complaint/Arrest Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-11 | 1/14/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for Eva ██████████ | | | | +| 323A-12 | 1/16/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-13 | 1/16/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-14a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-14b | 8/4/96 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Order Approving Settlement of Minor's Tort Claim | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-15a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-15b | 11/12/02 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Citations | | | | +| 323A-15c | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-15d | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-15e | 1/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15f | 4/7/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Amended Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15g | 5/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-15h | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order for Restitution | | | | +| 323A-15i | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-15j | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Fines, Costs and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323A-15k | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Sheriff Information Sheet | | | | +| 323A-15l | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Cost of Supervision Fee | | | | +| 323A-16a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-16b | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-16c | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report - Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-16d | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report | | | | +| 323A-16e | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List of Criminal Activity | | | | +| 323A-16f | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Order | | | | +| 323A-16g | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-16h | 1/4/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - No File for Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-17a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-17b | 7/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - No File for Possession of Scheduled IV Substance | | | | +| 323A-18a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-18b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear - Possession of a Controlled Substance | | | | +| 323A-18c | 6/15/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 07-603178 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-18d | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-18e | 7/9/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Information | | | | +| 323A-18f | 7/11/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity Report | | | | +| 323A-18g | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-18h | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323A-18i | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement | | | | +| 323A-18j | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323A-18k | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323A-18l | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-18m | 5/25/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges | | | | +| 323A-19a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB – Docket and Court Filings | | | | +| 323A-19b | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Boynton Beach Police Department - Battery | | | | +| 323A-19c | 10/18/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Information - Battery | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-19d | 10/29/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity | | | | +| 323A-20a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-20b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-21a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-21b | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-22a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-22b | 8/8/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-23a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-23b | 5/30/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-23c | 6/23/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement and Judgment | | | | +| 323A-24a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-24b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – North Palm Beach Public Safety Report No. 70-09009903 | | | | +| 323A-24c | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Notice of Arraignment | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-25a | | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Docket | | | | +| 323A-25b | 9/17/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-25c | 10/30/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Final Judgment for Possession | | | | +| 323A-26a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-26b | 10/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – First Appearance Disposition Record – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-26c | 10/9/09 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-27a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-27b | 6/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-28a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-28b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-29a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-29b | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Report No. 78-10001780 and Probable Cause Affidavit – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-29c | 9/16/10 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB Judgment, Sentence and Plea | | | | +| 323A-30a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | 4/4/10 State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 30b | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 31a | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906- | +| 323A- | 7/17/11 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | +| 323A- | 8/19/11 State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm 4OAA | +| 31c | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm 0 | +| 32a | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-227746- | +| 323A- | 9/15/10 State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial C • , | +| 32b | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-2 4 | +| 323A-33 | State of Florida v. E. W, 15th Judi ' ' , Palm | +| | Beach County Case No. 50-20 27 47- | +| | AXXX-MB — Docket and C. a ents | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W, 1 i ici 1 Circuit, Palm | +| 34a | Beach County Case N' to 201 -CT-014746- | +| | AXXX-SB — Dock n. II Documents | +| 323A- | 5/20/11 Arrest / Notice t , Palm Beach County | +| 34b | Sheriff's Offi Repo o. 06-11-076192 | +| 323A- | 5/20/11 Citation | +| 323A- | 8/19/11 State of v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 34d | B h Co ty Case No. 50-201I-CT-014746- | +| 323A- | to f Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 35a | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-36b | 5/10/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report No. 82-2012-10813 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-36c | 8/6/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-36d | 8/6/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-37a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-37b | 5/13/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report No. 40-12-006170 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-37c | 7/14/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-38 | | Eva J. [REDACTED] v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2013-DR-004661-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-39 | | Eva J. [REDACTED] v. Brent James Moody , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2013-DR-004658-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-40 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 62010TR074209A88830 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-41 | | Pinellas County Court docket search results – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-42a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 – Docket | | | | +| 323A-42b | 6/21/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-43a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943-WASP – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-43b | 6/21/13 | Citation | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-44 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943WPW – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-45 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46b | 8/20/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Sheriff's Office Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-46c | 7/19/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-46d | 6/23/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | +| 323A-46e | 6/22/13 | Complaint/Arrest Affidavit PP13-36627 | | | | +| 323A-46f | 5/30/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Judgment of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-46g | 9/17/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Affidavit Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-46h | 9/15/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Probation Specialist Report on Violation | | | | +| 323A-46i | 8/12/15 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Plea/Disposition on Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-47a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA021127XXXXNO – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-47b | 12/25/13 | Complaint / Arrest Affidavit Report No. 2013-77625 | | | | +| 323A-48a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA-128504 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-48b | 10/24/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-48c | 12/24/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-
49a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
49b | 1/17/14 | Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-
50a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
50b | 5/6/16 | Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-51 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02416-OC-CF – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-52 | | Hillsborough County search result – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-
53a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-012614 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
53b | 10/19/14 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear 14-16018 | | | | +| 323A-
53c | 6/18/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-012614 - Judgment and Sentence | | | | +| 323A-54 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-015507000AHC – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
55a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
55b | 10/19/14 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear 14-16018 | | | | +| 323A-
55c | 9/19/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 - Judgment and Sentence | | | | +| 323A-
56a | | Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
56b | 11/20/14 | Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC - Writ of Possession | | | | +| 323A-
57a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015TR009235000 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|---------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | 1/11/16 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 58a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | Judgment, Clerk's Certificate, Order of Revocation | +| 58b | | of Probation and Sentence | +| 323A- | 2/25/16 | State of Florida v. E. FV, 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| | 4/4/16 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | Report No. ACt'jlIC 16-190881 | +| 323A- | 11/20/15 | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59c | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-161 | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E. W., 13th Judicial C' ' | +| 60a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015 | +| 323A- | 1/11/15 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E. FE, 1 ' 1 \$ ici I Circuit Court, | +| 61a | | Hillsborough County No. I 16-CF | +| | | 004732000AHC — Court Documents | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | State of Florida Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 61b | | Hillsborough un e No. 2016-CF | +| | | 004732000A — ea, Sentencing, Judgment | +| 323A- | | State of orida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 62a | | Hillsborolk, - .unty Case No. 2016-CF | +| | | 0 3300; • HC — Docket and Court Documents | +| 323A- | 4/4/16 | 'nal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear — 16- | +| 62b | | 33 | +| 323A-63 | 7/2 | m Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-64 | 7/2 | 7 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-65 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-66 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-67 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-68 | 9/18/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-69 | 9/7/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-604687 | | | | +| 323A-70 | | Eva Jeanne v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-DR-009334-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-71 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Incident Report #2040097 | | | | +| 323A-72a | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-067231 | | | | +| 323A-72b | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 03-067249 | | | | +| 323A-72c | | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-72d | 5/20/03 | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323A-73a | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-091886 | | | | +| 323A-73b | | State of Florida v. Eva Ford , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2003-CF-008412-AXXX-MB – Docket an Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-74 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-096606 | | | | +| 323A-75 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-19767 | | | | +| 323A-76 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 | | | | +| 323A-77 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-21604 | | | | +| 323A-78 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 | | | | +| 323A-78a | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Information Sheet Case No. 0420500 | | | | +| 323A-78b | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report Agency Report No. 62-01-1-20500 | | | | +| 323A-79 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-084433 | | | | +| 323A-80 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-049448 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-81 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-06073437 | | | | +| 323A-82 | 6/9/07 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report #7028375 | | | | +| 323A-83 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 | | | | +| 323A-84a | | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-84b | 11/12/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-84c | 11/27/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Final Judgment for Eviction | | | | +| 323A-85 | | The David Associates I v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-011051-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-86a | 6/6/90 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 90-509-CA-01 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323A-86b | 3/13/08 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 95-7369 – Motion | | | | +| 323A-87 | | State of Florida v. Wesley William [REDACTED], Jr., 5 th Judicial Circuit, Hernando County, Case No. 90001037CFMA – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-88 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search | | | | +| 323A-88a | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed between Homes By West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 323A-88-b | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed between E.W. and Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 323A-89a | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-89b | 2/24/15 | Closing Documents – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-90 | 5/30/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-91 | 5/20/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 11-076192 with Supplements 1 & 2 | | | | +| 323B-1 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Earth Bubbles LLC and Corporate Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 323B-2 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Loxayoga LLC | +| 323B-3 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323B-4 | 10/14/17 | Palm Beach County Sherriffs Office Offense | +| 323B-5 | License Details -L.M. | | +| 323B-6 | License Details — L.M. | | +| 323B-7 | Twitter Account — L.M. | | +| 323B-8 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Wayne Seaman | +| | | 4141. , k. | +| 323B-9 | | Booking / Arrest Information — John Reidel `Sr | +| 323B-10 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Justin Sprague | +| 323B-11 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Lexine Turney | +| 323B-12a | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th | Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | 1/8/08 Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th | Judicial Ci | +| 323B-12c | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th Ju 'a it, Lee | +| | County Case No. 08-DR-0 | 1 - form Child | +| | Custody Jurisdiction and | fo ent Act | +| | 1/30/08 Justin Sprague v. L. | Ju cial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case No. 0 | R 41 - Respondent's | +| | Motion to Tra | n | +| 323B-12e | 2/26/08 Justin Spragu v. L. | 0th Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case | DR-003141 — Order on | +| | Motion | ransfer Venue — 50-2008-DR 003645 | +| 323B-I3 | Sharon R | Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach | +| | • Fr ty S | h Results — L.M. | +| | L | . to of DOR OBO v. Justin L. Sprague, 15th | +| | 1c . | I Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- | +| 323B-I6 | 1 | .M. v. Justin L. Sprague, 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| 323B-17 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-18 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-19 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-033050 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-20 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-045627 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-21 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-003304 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-22 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-004824 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-23 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097995 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-24 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097991 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-25 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-261718 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-26 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-27 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067444 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-28 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067445 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-29 | | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2008-DR-003645 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-30 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-195830 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-31 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338340 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-32 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338339 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 323B-33 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15"1 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-34 | State of Florida v. L.M., 151° | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-35 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-36a | State of Florida v. L.M., 15t6 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | 9/29/10 State of Florida v. L.M. 1516 | Circuit Court, Palm | +| 323B-36c | 10/11/10 Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probabl | | +| 323B-37 | State of Florida v. LM, 15'h | Judi ' rc , Palm | +| | Beach County Case No. 50-2 | 3416 — | +| 323B-38 | State of Florida v. L.M., | J ' ial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach County Case N | -TR-173415 — | +| | Docket and Court | o | +| 323B-39 | State of Florid | ., t6 Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach Coun | ase 50-2011-TR-173563 — | +| | Docket and Co | cuments | +| 323B-40 | State of Wa, v. L.M., 15i6 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | B ch | Case No. 50-2011-TR-175658 — | +| 323B-41a | to Florida v. L.M., 156 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-42 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-43a | State of Florida v. L.M., 1516 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | + +52 + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-43b | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 13-00742 | | | | +| 323B-44 | | Justin Lee Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2013-DR-001053 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-45 | | Maynor & Associates LLC FKA Maynor Sachs & Copple LLC v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-SC-010273 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-46 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. Wayne A. Seaman , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-DR-011327 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-47 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140544 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-48 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140545 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49a | | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49b | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323B-50 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-TR-007216 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-51 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045479 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-52 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045493 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-53 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-DR-012051 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-54 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , Broward County Clerk of Court Case No. 08102448TI20A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-55 | 8/6/95 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Christine [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-56 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Anna C. Terry | | | | +| 323B-57 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Robbie N. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323B-58 | 7/4/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-59a | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage with Dependent or Minor Child(ren) | | | | +| 323B-59b | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) Affidavit | | | | +| 323B-59c | 10/26/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Order to Effect Service of Process on Respondent or Judgment of Dismissal Without Prejudice | | | | +| 323B-60 | 5/23/01 | Christine C. [REDACTED] v. Scott A. Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Petition for Regular Dissolution of Marriage (with children) | | | | +| 323B-60a | 12/1/14 | Christine C. Miller v. Scott A. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323B-61 | | Anna Terry v. Scott [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2004 DR 001691 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62a | 7/6/04 | In re LM , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62b | 7/6/04 | In re L.M. , Petition for Involuntary Treatment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323B-62c | 7/15/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Information / Description Sheet | | | | +| 323B-62d | 7/20/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Order of Dismissal and Closing Mental Health File | | | | +| 323B62-e | 7/14/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Letter from Scott [REDACTED] to Commissioner Hanson | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323-B63 | 5/19/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98-079452 | | | | +| 323B-64 | 1/1/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99015315 | | | | +| 323B-65 | 3/28/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99052321 | | | | +| 323B-66 | 4/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 9906180 | | | | +| 323B-67 | 4/29/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-68 | 1/1/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-69 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-70 | 8/23/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-71 | 1/9/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-72 | 2/8/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-73 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-74 | 4/29/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-75 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-76 | 7/12/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-77 | 11/23/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-78 | 3/10/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-79 | 3/11/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-80 | 4/2/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-81 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-82 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-83 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-84 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-85 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-86 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-87 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-88 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-89 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-90 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-91 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-92 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-93 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-94 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-95 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-96 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 323B-97 | 9/12/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-121047 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-98 | 3/10/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-047084 | | | | +| 323B-99 | 6/2/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-081178 | | | | +| 323B-100 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 323B-101 | 3/31/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-056185 | | | | +| 323B-102 | 6/2/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-080955 | | | | +| 323B-103 | 8/19/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-110038 | | | | +| 323B-104 | 11/15/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-143988 | | | | +| 323B-105 | 12/1/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-149652 | | | | +| 323B-106 | 12/4/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-150902 | | | | +| 323B-107 | 3/4/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-047135 | | | | +| 323B-108 | 12/31/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-169751 | | | | +| 323B-109 | 8/7/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-106910 | | | | +| 323B-110 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 323B-111 | 1/4/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-022380 | | | | +| 323B-112 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 323B-113 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 323B-114 | 12/4/16 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 16-160017 | | | | +| 323C-1 | | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property Records | | | | +| 323C-2 | | Mugshot/Booking Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-3 | | Mugshot/Booking Information - Jamie Capalbo | | | | +| 323C-4 | 11/8/10 | Mugshot/Booking Information – Batu Tonaroglu | | | | +| 323C-5 | 6/26/00 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offence Report Case No. 00094263 | | | | +| 323C-6 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-7 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-8 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-9 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-10 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-11 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-12 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-13 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-14 | 9/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-15 | 12/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-16 | 1/6/04 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report – Case No. 04-000491 | | | | +| 323C-17 | 10/7/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04120214 | | | | +| 323C-18 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04140335 | | | | +| 323C-19 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-20 | 5/11/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 6065267 | | | | +| 323C-21 | 2/6/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-22 | 6/2/09 | State of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Driver Licenses Transcript Record – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-23 | | Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Criminal History Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-24 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , Broward County Circuit Court Case No. 11020221CF10A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-25 | | Palm Beach County Clerk of Court Search Results – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-26 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2002-IN-024424-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-27 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-IN-005174 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28b | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 05035619 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-28c | 5/23/05 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-28d | 5/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 Final Judgment for Fines, Costs, and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323C-29a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-29b | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2006065038 | | | | +| 323C-29c | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report and Probable Cause Affidavit - Report No. 06-15-0364 | | | | +| 323C-29d | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 06150364 | | | | +| 323C-29e | 12/27/06 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-29f | 1/25/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Capias | | | | +| 323C-29g | 10/6/12 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Clerk of Circuit Court – Case Bond Depositor Request Form and Assignment Form | | | | +| 323C-29h | 12/21/11 | Florida Driver License – Douglas Evan Schlien | | | | +| 323C-29i | 5/2/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No. 2007024243 | | | | +| 323C-29j | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323C-29k | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323C-29l | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-29m | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-008444-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Docs. | | | | +| 323C-30b | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07067112 | | | | +| 323C-30c | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2007023554 | | | | +| 323C-30d | 4/30/07 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-30e | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report - Report No. 06-07-067112 | | | | +| 323C-30f | 9/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Notice of Appearance by William Berger | | | | +| 323C-30g | 5/18/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 - Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30h | 6/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-31a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-31b | 10/28/09 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Notice of Appearance by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler – Jonathan Birkman | | | | +| 323C-32a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-009222 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-32b | 3/23/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citation #4202-RSK 5 | | | | +| 323C-33a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-33b | 9/12/10 | Delray Beach Police Department - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report No. FLO 500400 | | | | +| 323C-33c | 9/12/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citations | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-33d | 10/7/10 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-33e | 2/7/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-34a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 - Docket and Court Docs | | | | +| 323C-34b | 9/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-34c | 2/9/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-35a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-0158219 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-35b | 9/12/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010045488 | | | | +| 323C-35c | 11/15/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010056669 | | | | +| 323C-36a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-36b | 11/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-37a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864 –Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-37b | 12/8/10 | Traffic Citation | | | | +| 323C-38a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-021516 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-38b | 12/9/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-39a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037753 – Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-39a | 12/11/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-40a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037705 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-40b | 12/15/10 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office – Arrest/Notice to Appear Report | | | | +| 323C-40c | 12/15/10 | Citations | | | | +| 323C-41a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-039080 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-41b | 12/15/10 | Citations | | | | +| 323C-41c | 1/14/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-42a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-312095-AXXX-NB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-42b | 12/15/10 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-43a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-001899-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-43b | 12/15/10 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-44a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-44b | 1/28/11 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-44c | 5/29/12 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703-AXXX-MB – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-45a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-45b | 2/1/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report No. 06-11-033106 | | | | +| 323C-45c | 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-45d | 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Order of No Contact | | | | +| 323C-45e | 3/14/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – No File | | | | +| 323C-46a | | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-46b | 2/16/11 | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, Dismissal of Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323C-47a | | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-47b | 2/22/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, | | | | +| 323C-47c | 3/2/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323C-48 | | Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49a | | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49b | 11/1/16 | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Petition for Temporary Custody, Order for Relative Custody | | | | +| 323C-50 | 3/20/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8441655 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-51 | 5/10/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8460082 | | | | +| 323C-52 | 4/30/88 | Affidavit of Probable Cause – Possession of Cocaine; [REDACTED] Dial | | | | +| 323C-53 | 5/13/88 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Case No. 88-5449-CF - Information for Possession of Cocaine | | | | +| 323C-54 | 1/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 9114746 | | | | +| 323C-55a | 4/3/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Fugitive Warrant, Waiver of Extradition, Order and Fugitive Release | | | | +| 323C-55b | 4/1/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 9169712 | | | | +| 323C-56a | 4/25/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-49190F – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-56b | 3/23/91 | West Palm Beach Police Department, Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 94-91-20938 | | | | +| 323C-57 | 7/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91123360 | | | | +| 323C-58 | 7/13/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91132390 | | | | +| 323C-59 | 8/15/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91148337 | | | | +| 323C-60a | 6/5/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Allen Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9388CF – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-60b | 7/9/91 | Probable Cause Affidavits, Report No. 91-127098 | | | | +| 323C-61a | 8/26/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9862-CF – Information for burglary and grand theft | | | | +| 323C-61b | 8/15/91 | Greenacres City Dept. of Public Safety Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 4-21-1918682 | | | | +| 323C-62a | 4/16/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage; Petition for Child Custody and Other Relief | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-62b | 12/8/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED] , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 - Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323C-63 | 11/23/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98161878 | | | | +| 323C-64a | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial Arrest Affidavit – First Degree Murder / Aggravated Child Abuse | | | | +| 323C-64b | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-65a | 5/18/99 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Information; possession of counterfeit bills | | | | +| 323C-65b | 1/21/99 | Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety - Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-65c | 10/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Sentence and Judgment | | | | +| 323C-65d | 11/7/01 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial v. State of Florida , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D00-4167 - Opinion | | | | +| 323C-66 | 3/10/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-044660 | | | | +| 323C-67 | 8/22/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-112705 | | | | +| 323C-68 | 9/3/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-117506 | | | | +| 323C-69 | 9/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-17025 | | | | +| 323C-70 | 10/13/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-133427 | | | | +| 323C-71a | 7/24/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF – Information for Third Degree Grand Theft | | | | +| 323C-71b | 7/7/00 | Arrest Affidavit Report No. 1430000 and Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-71c | 6/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF - Complaint Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-72 | 1/19/02 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form and Arrest Affidavit – [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial – aggravated manslaughter | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-73 | 2/13/04 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-875-CFB – Judgment; Aggravated manslaughter of a child | | | | +| 323C-74 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-75 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No., 00-875-CFA – Interview of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-76 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-375 – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-77 | 2/17/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06034056 | | | | +| 323C-78 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06073497 | | | | +| 323C-79 | 10/4/06 | Greenacres Department of Public Safety Offense Report No. 06-15661 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-80 | 10/5/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06119682 | | | | +| 323C-81 | 10/8/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 061210144 | | | | +| 323C-82a | 6/26/06 | In re [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB – Petition for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82b | 7/14/06 | Comprehensive Alcoholism Rehabilitation Programs, Inc. Chemical Dependency Assessment Form | | | | +| 323C-82c | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Order for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82d | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Report on Hearing | | | | +| 323C-83a | 8/2/07 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 07CF009101AMB – Information for fraudulent use of a credit card | | | | +| 323C-83b | 6/24/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83c | 8/26/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83d | 6/24/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323D-1 | 11/4/97 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323D-2 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 98-027604 – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-3 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-4 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-5 | N/D | In re Daniel [REDACTED] III, 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2000-GA-000718 - Docket | | | | +| 323D-6 | 6/10/01 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-7 | 8/3/01 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-8 | 3/2/02 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Department of Public Safety – 02-14029 – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-9 | Misc. | State of Florida v. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-MMM-011621 - Docket and Case information - Petit Theft | | | | +| 323D-10 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-075321 – Virginia [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-11 | | State of Florida v. Virginia Roberts , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-TR-155872 - Docket | | | | +| 323D-12 | 6/19/02 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – Virginia Roberts | | | | +| 323D-13 | | State of Florida v. Virginia [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-TR-212355 - Docket | | | | +| 323E-1 | 4/8/16 | Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement | | | | +| 323E-2 | 1/6/15 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Complaint | | | | +| 323E-3 | 2/10/15 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-4 | 8/12/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's First Amended Counterclaim | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323E-5 | 4/8/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-6 | 12/4/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability | | | | +| 323E-7 | 11/23/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records | | | | +| 323E-8 | 12/11/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Exhibit 6 to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-9 | 12/16/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Virginia [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-10 | 1/8/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-11 | 1/12/16 | Counter-Claim Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Dershowitz's First Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-12 | 1/26/16 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Alan Dershowitz's Opposition to [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-13 | 2/1/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim and for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages Against Plaintiffs | | | | +| 323F-1 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – About Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323F-2 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 323F-3 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| 323F-4 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Doe v. U.S. | | | | +| 323F-5 | | Pottinger Website Printout – In the News | | | | +| 323F-6 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Sexual Harassment and Abuse on Wall Street | | | | +| 323F-7 | | News Article – Boynton Woman wins \$71 million in lawsuit about rape on yacht | | | | +| 323F-8 | 1/29/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Verdict | | | | +| 323F-9 | 1/30/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323F-10 | 2/22/16 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-11 | 7/1/15 | Michael Demella v. The Las Olas Holding Company , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-12 | 11/15/17 | The Las Olas Holding Company v. Michael Demella , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D16-231 - Mandate and 7/19/17 Opinion | | | | +| 323F-13 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Amended Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-14 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law | | | | +| 323F-15 | 11/18/16 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Judgment | | | | +| 323F-16 | 8/5/15 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-17 | 12/6/11 | Conner v. Clyde Enterprises, Inc. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 10-002726 – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-18 | 10/21/14 | Michael Barnes v. Prince’s Beach Bar , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 13-022624 – Verdict Form | | | | +| 323G-1 | | Property Records for 1109 N.E. 2 Street, Hallandale Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323G-2 | | Property Records for 10141 S.W. 40 th Street, Davie Florida | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323G-3 | | Property Records for 2385 N.W. 34 Way, Coconut Creek, Florida | | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | | | | +| 324-1 | 7/11/08 | Victim's Reply to Government's Response to Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (D.E. 9) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-2 | 7/15/08 | Government's Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act (D.E. 13) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-3 | 7/15/08 | Declaration of ██████ Villafana in Support of United States' Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement (D.E. 14) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-4 | 7/11/08 | Transcript of hearing (D.E. 15) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-5 | 7/29/08 | Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing (D.E. 17) (( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-6 | 8/1/08 | Victim's Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Protection of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-7 | 9/25/08 | Victim's Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (D.E. 28) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-8 | 12/22/08 | Supplemental Declaration of ██████ Villafana (D.E. 35) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-9 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-10 | 9/13/10 | Petitioners' Notice in Response to Administrative Order Closing Case (D.E. 39) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-11 | 10/27/10 | Petitioners' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution (D.E. 41) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-12 | 10/28/10 | Order (D.E. 44) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-13 | 12/17/10 | Status Report (D.E. 45) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-14 | 9/2/11 | Motion for Limited Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 93) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-15 | 9/26/11 | Order (D.E. 99) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-16 | 10/14/11 | Epstein's Omnibus Reply in Support of his Motion for Limited Intervention (D.E. 108) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-17 | 12/5/11 | Petitioners' Protective Motion for Remedies (D.E. 128) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-18 | 3/29/12 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 159) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-19 | 4/17/12 | Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 for Production, Use and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations (D.E. 162) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-20 | 4/18/12 | Notice of Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (D.E. 163) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-21 | 6/18/13 | Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Proffer Government Correspondence in Support of CVRA Claims & Granting Motion to Unseal Correspondence and Related Unredacted Pleadings of Petitioners (D.E. 188) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-22 | 6/27/13 | Notice of Appeal of Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 195) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-23 | 7/8/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Protective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 207) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-24 | 7/12/13 | Petitioners' Response to Epstein's Motion for Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 209) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-25 | 7/26/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 215) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-26 | 8/8/13 | Petitioners' Response to Third Motion for "Limited" Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 221) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-27 | 8/9/13 | Epstein's Reply to Petitioners' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 222) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-28 | 2/13/14 | Order Granting Jeffrey Epstein's Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 246) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-29 | 6/11/14 | Letter from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11 th Circuit with Judgment (D.E. 254) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-30 | 9/22/14 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 256) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-31 | 1/5/15 | Declaration of Alan Dershowitz (D.E. 282-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-32 | 1/14/15 | Order Requesting Justification for Intervenor Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order (D.E. 286) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-33 | 4/15/15 | Order Denying Intervenor's Motion for a Protective Order (D.E. 326) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-34 | 2/10/16 | Petitioners' Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment With Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 361) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-35 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of E.W. (D.E. 361-26) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-36 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of L.M. (D.E. 324-36) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-37 | N/D | Court Docket ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-38 | 9/21/06 | Letter from James Eisenberg to A. [REDACTED] Villafana (D.E. 403-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of [REDACTED] exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac B 903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680 Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(Minkrocklaw.com + +(S'Sir e Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..711b6e1f35ea3e3ac559f898e2676802d4ba95e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043/EFTA02765043.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2440 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765043.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 74, + "chars": 326668, + "elapsed_seconds": 51.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN LY EPSTEIN'S \nCLERK'S TRIAL E I ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 373.9689636230469, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 373.9689636230469, + 504.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 504.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein O \n15111Judicial Circuit", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 436.6908874511719, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 436.6908874511719, + 283.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 283.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E\n\"\nL.M . Je pstein \n15th Judicial Circuit o 0-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.0399932861328, + 389.2215576171875 + ], + [ + 464.398681640625, + 389.2215576171875 + ], + [ + 464.398681640625, + 425.60302734375 + ], + [ + 151.0399932861328, + 425.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nIr 0 . P C S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.048, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 409.5517578125, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 409.5517578125, + 510.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 186.048, + 510.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 465.60736083984375, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 465.60736083984375, + 651.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 651.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jar oe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUS .D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.1012878417969, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.1012878417969, + 481.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 481.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffre E \u2022 in (Consolidated Action)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 439.0475158691406, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 439.0475158691406, + 409.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 409.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USDC S.D . Ca e No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 409.6892395019531, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 409.6892395019531, + 423.363037109375 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 423.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler \u2014 Communication", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.272, + 562.9499999999999 + ], + [ + 427.46466064453125, + 562.9499999999999 + ], + [ + 427.46466064453125, + 578.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 187.272, + 578.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 86 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 188 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 217 + ], + [ + "Line", + 109 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 184 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 152 + ], + [ + "Line", + 76 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 171 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765043" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0cc141fbcadbd4a47cb7261b3104411d56e7092 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +## PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ORIGINAL RETURN + +Court: Case No.: County: Circuit 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Palm Beach + +LINK & ROCKENBACH. PA 1555 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR TRIAL & COPY + +17623 48TH COURT NORTH LOXAHATCHEE, FL 33470 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, ETC C DS' te Cil + +Received this Writ on February 20, 2018 at 2:05 PM and was to \ ut on February 27, 2018, in Palm Beach County, Florida, a true copy of this Writ, endorsed thereon by me, Eric Stul + +## Attempts: + +2212018@ 11:29 AM 2/22/2018 @ 7:44 AM 2/27/2018 @ 10:49 AM + +Office received letter from plaintiff's a e advising us to cease all efforts to serve this subpoena due to reaching an agrocmcnt. + +By: Eric Stull 9172 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0327f2177e5c84e42e05c5519141c40a5770b4e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117/EFTA02765117.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765117.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 755, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ORIGINAL RETURN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 448.76177978515625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 448.76177978515625, + 51.99200439453125 + ], + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 51.99200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attempts:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 84.54302978515625, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 84.54302978515625, + 450.3445739746094 + ], + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 450.3445739746094 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765117" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a0df5f0c48c0ce22a0096124decff9d07c93569 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF UMC HEARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/C Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein hereby cancels the following hearing at the time stated below, the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County C9t4Eh e, 05 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +04 + +MOTION: PI tiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Audio Re g + +DATE: ( S Monday, , March 5,2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 5;10 903) Angela M. Many (FINt2 Primary: Scott@IInkrocklliw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com Eservicealinkrocklaw.com + +(SS1 E' rCounsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a000b17af4b66084d826622769fecc72102375fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118/EFTA02765118.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765118.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5664, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF UMC HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 446.2176818847656, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 446.2176818847656, + 356.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 356.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765118" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76079a23a5af9e6d727c1dcb541867ba81fb9f40 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +10 SEP 17 PM 3:39 +BOCK. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** Thursday, September 23, 2010 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. ██████ + +**PLACE:** 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +██████ J. ██████ Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to +resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the fo oing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of S tember, 2010. + +> AROLA ar No.: 169440 Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 9 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach, Florida 33409 one: (561) 686-6300 Fax: Attorney for (516-9451 J. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@,agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +B(1. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)424-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Chri her E. Knight, Esq. L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 777 S Flagler Drive, Suittr901 West Palm Beach, FL 33 Phone: (561)802- Fax: (561)-802- Attorneys for em + +Marc S. Law Marc S. Nurik One E Bro Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +s)c + +Co s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aebd9fe1d2b4f77f9c551b7e1946a2bc725086fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121/EFTA02765121.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765121.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2401, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.552, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 367.842, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 367.842, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 237.552, + 349.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.66, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 276.942, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 276.942, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 66.66, + 568.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.54999999999995, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 146.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 257.54999999999995, + 146.36248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765121" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1100de3ac3a0237e9fb4d7ff536210e5f0530198 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.md @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN EY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT'S PERMISSION A R TRIAL EVIDENCE BY REPLACING N ALS OF Min THREE CLIEF N TRIAL EXHIBITS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je to replace on Epstein's trial a') clients with initials "L.M." and "E.W." for two of them and the pseudonym "Jane Doe" the client and states: "Epstein"), moves this Court for permission times of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. + +- 1, tte special set for a 10-day jury trial commencing on March 13, 2018. +- 2. ance with this Court's Pretrial Order, the parties have listed witnesses and exhibi ing identifying by full name his three clients on witness lists and various m ons with attachments filed with the Court that may be used as exhibits. +- 3. In pretrial hearings, this Court has been cautious to protect the identity of three clients, utilizing initials and a pseudonym - L.M., E.W., and Jane Doc - whenever possible. + +4. Cognizant of this Court's intent to protect the identity of 1 three clients, Epstein has been careful not to reference names of three clients on trial exhibits that Epstein intends to seek admission into evidence and publication to the jury. + +5. Additionally, Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425(a) requires parties to limit certain "designated sensitive information" filed with the Court. + +6. As the parties move toward trial and are now presenting the Cot4lb lerk with actual exhibits to be published to the jury, Epstein requests permission t evidence by replacing the names with initials of three clients, L.M. . . e Doc, with the understanding of who the three individuals are and to the extept j at imony and evidence is introduced subject to this Court's evidentiary rulings. + +7. In anticipation of this Court's re ' S y example, Epstein submits an s 1 i Appendix which identifies some of Epstein's ' %, 'trial exhibits for publication to the jury. The Appendix filed with this motion r the ctual names with initials and the pseudonym. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff' - fendant, Jeffrey Epstein, requests that this Court grant this Motion for Court Pe iss Redact Names of MI' Three Clients and replace with initials on Trial Exh1'7\* + +CAS + +'....) + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of ██████ rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +### ILLUSTRATIVE APPENDIX OF TRIAL EXHIBITS + +- State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-MM-002316-AXXX-MB - Soliciting another to commit prostitution. L.M. running escort service. "[L.M.[ stated growing up her mother was in the escort business which caused her to become involved in it." +- 2. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04 3 L.M. and E.W. soliciting sex +- 3. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Ca at age of 14, having sexual relations with an 18-y sexual relationship, but did not know it was illegal, did educate her on safe sex e o. 8781 — L.M., other knew of not control her, but +- 4. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O p \$ort Case No. 13-100174 Complaint that ex-boyfriend distrib et r to her neighbors stating that she was a prostitute +- 5. Palm Beach County Sheriff's O se Report Case No. 12-025901 Child abuse investigation into L. so eing present during altercation she was involved in with her sister — L. . was holding her sister by the back of the throat. L.M.'s father WEIS holding L.M.'s sister's boyfriend while L.M. beat on him and a friend choked him. Noted that L.M., her father and sister were abusing Xanax marijuana and alcohol. L.M.'s father was in the moonshine business and L s Mother owns a prostitution ring +- 6. Palm Beac abuse. ins in a- e Taney v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- DR-010853-XXXX-NB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense eport No. 14-152173 — Turney claimed her son's father was living with L.M. and, when visiting him, was being abused by L.M. and L.M.'s son. Turney's son claimed they had "sex parties" and "hurt him." +- 8. L.M. Assessment, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 04- MH-001376 — Marchman Act filed by father: "Does not listen and has bad attitude. Comes home when she wants to and is in trouble with police for one reason or another. She is taking Xanax, cocaine and alcohol" ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 09-067050 — Child g tion into L.M.'s son being present during altercation she was vith her sister's boyfriend + +- Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-605242 Simple battery Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 09-044965 — Battery Anna Teny v. Scott =, 15Ih Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2004-DR-001691- XXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 04-030740 — L.M. threatened to kill another student, threw things at her and atsempted to run her over with a golf cart; restraining order issued +- 12. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach C 2010-MM-017555-AXXX-MB — Criminal mischief / r item at another vehicle Cast No. 50 e — throwing Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report . 03-084114 — Sliced neighbor's tires State of Florida v. L.M., 15`h Judicial Ci illi)Beach County 2013-MM-000924-AXXX-MB — Retai Palm Beach County Sheriff's Runaway Palm Beach County Sh Alleged child neglect Palm Beach C Witness to MSS Palm Bea Vicgi, of al(sadlt nse Report Case No. ce Offense Report Case No. ff's Office Offense Report Case No. nt of Baby Dolls establishment Case No. 50- 04-091683 - 07-048173 — 03-104546 ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-019468 — C alm .) Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. Domestic disturbance; fight with father aim Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police +- 21. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police 04-086777 - 14-056185 — 14080955 - +- 22. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 17-047135 Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police — would not put dogs away + +- 23. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-06692 Domestic disturbance +- 24. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-073437 Domestic disturbance +- 25. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-087957 Domestic disturbance +- 26. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 138285 Domestic disturbance +- 27. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Cpe 07-047967 Domestic disturbance +- 28. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Rep e No. 07-605437 Domestic disturbance +- 29. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O 1 e rt Case No. 07-601764 Domestic disturbance +- 30. Palm Beach County Sheriff's nse Report Case No. 12-022380 Domestic violence +- 31. Palm Beach County S Office Offense Report Case No. 14-110038 Domestic violence +- 32. Palm Beach Co4ty1yfiffs Office Offense Report Case No. 14-143988 Domestic viole +- 33. Palm Bea ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 14-149652 Dom t.tic v le ce +- 34. ch County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 14-150902 +. M. v. Wayne Seaman, 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 014-DR-011327-XXXX-NB — Domestic violence es c dispute / potential theft + - 36. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 12-121047 Domestic disturbance + - 37. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 13-047084 Domestic disturbance + +- 38. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 17-169751 Domestic disturbance +- 39. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 16-160017 Domestic disturbance +- 40. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 95-099109 Domestic dispute between L.M.'s parents +- 41. Justin Sprague v. L.M., Lee County Case No. 08-DR3141 Cust dispute Father of L.M.'s son: "She has moved a number of times, to much, multiple abusive boyfriends." [Typographical errors in orig +- 42. L.M. v. John T. Riedel, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beat Case No. 50- 2007-DR-003304-XXXX-NB — Petition for injun dating violence; boyfriend on cocaine +- 43. L.M. v. John T. Riedel, 15th Judicial Circu 2007-DR-004824-XXXX-NB -- Petition t boyfriend intoxicated / violent +- 44. Palm Beach County Sheriff's \' nse Report Case No. 13-081178 each County Case No. 50 ction for dating violence; Reported theft then would n e with police +- 45. Palm Beach County S ce Offense Report Case No. 12-106910 Witness to battery u nd at Cheetah's Nightclub +- 46. L.M. v. Justin S Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2006-DR-0158 -MB — Child support dispute +- 47. Justin Lee e v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2 3-D 053-XXXX-MB — Custody dispute +- 48. lorida v. L.M., 15 di Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. -TR-003759-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; failure to stop at red light A \ an\ . fate of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-024102-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; unlawful speed +- 50. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-033050-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; proof of insurance +- 51. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-045627-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; no lamps or illuminating devices + +- 52. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097995-AXXX-NB — Driver's license not carried / exhibits on demand +- 53. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097991-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; failure to use seat belt +- 54. State of Florida V. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-261718-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; unlawful speed +- 55. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; license pQ not ssigned; proof of insurance +- 56. State of Florida v. L.M., 15ih Judicial Circuit Court, P 50-2008-TR-067444-XXX-SB — Driving citation; p f of nsurance +- 57. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit lm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067445-AXXX-SB — Drivi unknowingly operating a vehicle while driver's license suspend +- 58. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Chu Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-195830-AXXX- -ting citation; proof of insurance +- 59. State of Florida V. L.M., JudiThal Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338340- — Driving citation; following too closely ( County Case No. +- 60. State of Florida Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-33 -WB — Driving citation; failing to carry driver's license +- 61. State Flo't ddv. L.M., 15ih Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 40662-AXXX-SB — Driving citation; speeding +- 62. Florida v. L.M., 15ih Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 10-TR-082840-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding +- 63. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-098843-AXXX-MB —Driving citation; speeding +- 64. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173416-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; failure to use seat belt +- 65. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173415-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; proof of insurance + +- 66. State of Florida v. L.M., 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173563-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; failure to carry driver's license +- 67. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-175658-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding +- 68. State of Florida V. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-TR-093785-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; improper / defective equipment on golf cart +- 69. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beaceunty asc No. 50-2015-TR-140544-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; expired registration +- 70. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, P Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140545-AXXX-MB — Driving citation ailyre to carry driver's license +- 71. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circ alm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-TR-007216-AXXX-MB - D • n rtylhon; unknowingly operating a vehicle while driver's license suspe +- 72. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th J illi c it uit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045479-AXXX — ving citation; proof of insurance +- 73. State of Florida v. L. 50-2017-TR-04549 icial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. B — Driving citation; speeding +- 74. State of Florid ., 176 Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2008-TR-102448 ving citation; failure to yield the right of away + +# LW. + +- 1. ch County Sheriff's Office Offense Report, Case No. 04-084433 L.M. . soliciting sex tate v. E.W., I l'h Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. 2012-CF-029832 — Prostitution and possession of a controlled substance +- 3. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2006-CF-016146-AXXX-MB — Aggravated battery +- 4. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB — Simple battery + +- 5. State of Florida v. E.W., 6th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013- CD:162524 — DUI causing damage to person or property +- 6. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 Theft of Xanex pills +- 7. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 Landlord report of suspected drug activity +- 8. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough unty Case No. 2016-CF-004732000AHC — Drug trafficking in ampheta 8 to 200 grams +- 9. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beac Case No. 50- 2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB — Possession of cocaine', +- 10. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, m Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB — Possession of schedule IV substance, possession of marijuana, possession of n ti "equipment +- 11. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judici t i alm Beach County Case No. 50- 2010-CF003921-AXXX-MB - P n f schedule II substance, possession of schedule IV substance, pos marijuana +- 12. State of Florida v. E.W., Judial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-MM-013914- Possession of marijuana +- 13. State of Florida Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-MM-0182 -NB — Possession of marijuana +- 14. Palm B ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 GrEZ Th +- 15. alm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-049448 Pos ssion of marijuana and outstanding warrant for grand theft tate of Florida v. E.W., 15i° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB — Grand theft +- 17. State of Florida v. E.W., 15i° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB — Grand theft +- 18. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB — Retail theft + +- 19. +- 20. +- 21. +- 22. +- 23. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough No. 2014-MM-012614 — Petit theft State of Florida v. E.W., 136 Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough No. 2014-MM-015507000AHC — Petit theft State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough No. 2014-MM-01601800 — Petit theft (second conviction) County Case County Case County Case State of Florida v. E.W., 13'h Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough At Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 — Petit theft; felony third degree State of Florida v. E.W., 136 Judicial Circuit Court, Hill No. 2016-CF-004733000AHC — Felony petit theft; r violence +- 24. Boynton Beach Police Incident Report #204009 c1 h +- 25. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O e rt Case No. 09-085397 Shoplifting +- 26. Palm Beach County Sheriff's tense Report Case No. 07-604687 Possession of stolen equipme County Case cer without +- 27. +- 28. +- 29. +- 30. +- 31. +- 32. +- 33. State of Florida v. E.W. ellas ounty Circuit Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF — Arrest hold by all for processing; Felony lit degree State of Florida CF — Arrest ho inellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02416-OCsborough County for processing; Felony 1" degree Palm Beacl ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-067249; Eva v. Jam R. b a, 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633 — A tions of lewd or lascivious molestation upon E.W. by mother's O rid; mother crack addict Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-091886 ltercation with mother; mother arrested for battery Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report No. 7028375 — Altercation with another employee at Platinum Gold Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-096606 — Runaway West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-19767 — Runaway + +- 34. West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-21604 Runaway +- 35. State of Florida v. E. W, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA021127XXXXNO + - Driving while license suspended; arrested for outstanding warrants relating to DUI +- 36. State of Florida v. E.W., 6th Judicial Circuit Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013- CA-128504 — Felony; driving while license permanently suspended +- 37. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, No. 50- 2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB — Operating vehicle license suspended/revoked, unregistered motor vehicle, unassigned ; failure to appear arrests +- 38. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm ac oufity, Case No. 50- 2010-CT-029906-AXXX-MB — Operating hie while license suspended/revoked, speeding, failing to disp}ajeg ation and insurance; failure to appear arrest +- 39. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial P hn Beach County, Case No. 50- 2010-TR-227746-AXXX-MB — Unto operating vehicle while driver's license suspended, cancelled or +- 40. State of Florida v. E.W, 15 treSici i Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 02- 26985TCA02 — Driving on; olation of probation +- 41. State of Florida v. Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR-16348 +- 42. State of Florida i ll., 15i° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR- MOCX-MB — Driving vehicle in unsafe condition +- 43. \*da v. E.W, 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. TR-204547-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; not wearing seat belt +- Driving vehicle in unsafe condition of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; not wearing seat belt +- 45. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding +- 46. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50- 2010-TR-227747-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; failure to provide proof of insurance + +- 47. State of Florida v. E.W., 15ih Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2011-Cr-014746-AXXX-SB — Driving with a suspended driver's license; failing to drive in single lane +- 48. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB — Driving with a suspended driver's license; probation revoked +- 49. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. -076192 officer 1 Driving with a suspended license; lied to and gave false na e +- 50. State of Florida v. E.W. 0 Judicial Circuit, PinellasQty e No. 522013TR062559 — Careless driving +- 51. State of Florida v. E.W., 18'h Judicial Circuit, 62010TR074209A88830 — Evasion; failure to pay t +- 52. State of Florida v. E.W., 0 Judicial Ci inellas County Case No. 522013TR062943 — Failure to show proo jj in nce +- 53. State of Florida v. E.W., 136 Judie 'Sif, u Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015TR009235000 — Opera Aunty Case No. ott r vehicle with expired registration +- 54. State of Florida v. E.W., 1 diet Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015TR009236000 ivin n suspended license with knowledge +- 55. Andrew Pastor v. udicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-CC-01483 — Tenant eviction +- 56. Arocket I, LLC i E, 13i° Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 201 790A001HC — Tenant eviction +- 57. each County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case Nos. 07-603908, 07- 07-603910, 07-603911 and 07-603912 — Roommate arrested for ary + +Jane + +- 1. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15\*Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 11-033106 — Child neglect; Jane Doe was pregnant and using needles to shoot up opiates; Jane Doe's child was attacked by pit bull when unattended + +- 2. Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB — Alleged Jane Doe had an I.V. drug use addiction; while pregnant with his child, she was shooting up using heroin and Roxicodone +- 3. Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB — Turned custody of child over to grandmother +- 4. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-015821-AXXX-SB — Possession of narcotics eau ent +- 5. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beac nty ase No. 2010-MM-021516-AXXX-MB — Possession of drug parapher alia; Jane Doe admitted to shooting up pills and she informed officers where she kept her needles +- 6. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense c4 o e No. 05-035619 Grand theft auto +- 7. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office se eport Case No. 04-140336 Elderly abuse +- 8. State v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial urt, Palm Beach County Case No. 2006- MM-029242-AXXX-MB; P County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-150364 — R +- 9. State of Florida v. ..I No. 50-2007-M Offense Report 5th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case AXXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office 7112 — Retail theft +- 10. Palm Bea ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 05-019158 Posscssion f t bacco by a minor le. iState v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2005-IN-005174-AXXXX-MB — Possession of tobacco by a minor +- 11. eFlorida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 24424-AXXX-MB — Possession of tobacco by a minor +- 13. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-094884 Runaway +- 14. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-108484 Runaway + +- 15. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-113653 Runaway; uncontrollable +- 16. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-116357 Runaway +- 17. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-116631 Runaway +- 18. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No.Aik -122524 Runaway +- 19. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report C 03-116298 Runaway; officer found Jane Doe in a vehicle occupi o nown heroin addicts +- 20. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense e No. 03-118053 Runaway +- 21. +- 22. West Palm Beach Police Report +- 23. West Palm Beach Police Report Case Palm Beach County Sheriff' ( ce ot ffense Report Case No. 03-114489 — Jane Doe reported child abu laimS gainst mother; during interview, Jane Doe (age 15) disrespectf9i tmitted to smoking to one pack of cigarettes every 2-3 days an 3 — Runaway Nemi . r000491— Runaway smoking for 3-4 years +- 24. Palm Beach Co \*ty S) riffs Office Offense Report Case No. 04-120214 Child neglect; Jane D 01eft home alone while grandmother was on vacation; neighbor ained of suspected drug activities +- 25. St Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 006666-AXXX-MB — Careless driving, driving without a license, g the scene of an accident IlteeiSfate of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; driving in wrong direction +- 27. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-009222-AXXX-MB — Driving without a license; failure to appear arrests +- 28. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2010-CT-027408-AXXX-SB — Driving without a license; careless driving + +- 29. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 — Driving with knowledge without license; speeding failure to display registration; failure to appear arrests +- 30. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 11020221CF10A — Driving while licensed revoked; failure to obey traffic sign +- 31. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach unty Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; +- 32. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 151 Judicial Circuit Court, Pa County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864-AXXX-MB — Driving with no I +- 33. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Co Pal Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037753-AXXX-MB — DrivingMtj n cense; no seat belt +- 34. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial rt, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037705-AXXX-MB with no license; arrests for failure to appear +- 35. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 1 Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-039080- -M — Driving with no license; speeding; arrests for failure to ap +- 36. State of Florida v. J e 5t° Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-T -NB — Seat belt violation +- 37. State of Florida v. e Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-20 -001899-AX3OC-MB — No proof of insurance +- 38. Stg4 Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case 11-CT-003703-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; arrests for to appear ane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB - Domestic +- 40. Raw Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB — Domestic +- 41. Multiple records concerning Jane Doe's parents' criminal and drug background \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7b60fb49d6d2cd9fee2e927956145fcfca15e35 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124/EFTA02765124.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,761 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765124.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 31875, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN EY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR COURT'S PERMISSION A R TRIAL EVIDENCE \nBY REPLACING N ALS OF \nMin THREE CLIEF N TRIAL EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 499.01416015625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 499.01416015625, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ILLUSTRATIVE APPENDIX OF TRIAL EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 448.41461181640625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 448.41461181640625, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LW.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 102.11441802978516, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 102.11441802978516, + 514.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 514.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765124" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1862f10b3796afb041de0e32e2e468c0145d16a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXX/vD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND MOTION FOR COURT PERMISSION TO COMPLY Y EPSTEIN'S TRIAL EVIDENCE 2.425 + +Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey "Epstein"), moves this Court for permission to alter trial evidence to comply with of Judicial Administration 2.425 and states: + +- 1. This matter is s a 10-day jury trial commencing on March 13, 2018. is Court's Pretrial Order, the parties have listed witnesses and extensive exhibits, which pertain to three clients whose identity has been cautiously protea y the Court unless the clients' consent otherwise. The issue of identifying informat\* ards ' three clients and altering trial exhibits is specifically addressed in a sep filed simultaneously with this motion. + - 3. Additionally, the parties' trial exhibits may otherwise implicate Rule 2.425, +- 2. In compliance whether pertaining to three clients or other individuals, as the exhibits contain potentially sensitive information involving three clients' and/or others' court records, police records, and police reports. + +4. Rule 2.425(b) contains an exception for "(8) Traffic and criminal proceedings;" but this is unclear as to whether it would also allow police reports and records. + +5. Therefore, in an abundance of caution, Epstein seeks this Court's guidance on altering his trial exhibits that may contain not only birthdates, email addresses, or driver's license numbers known as "designated sensitive information" pursuant to Rule 2.425, but al o criminal and police reports and records that may need to be altered. + +6. The exhibits are contained within Exhibit D of the Notice Appendix in Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Secon pi ent to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je tn, requests that this Court grant this Motion for Court Permission to Alter Tri S /SI, v to Comply with Rule 2.425. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of ██████ Mr S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0248cb3ae9fce2e7d006ee7db32a83eb4679218b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141/EFTA02765141.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765141.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6848, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.76, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nMOTION FOR COURT PERMISSION \nTO COMPLY \nY EPSTEIN'S \nTRIAL EVIDENCE \n2.425", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 494.5403137207031, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 494.5403137207031, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765141" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..325787bdb045cdf415beb8f07ce9af55ee60bfc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.md @@ -0,0 +1,939 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, 1 L.M., individually, individually, and + +Defendant, + +#### MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT THE INTRODUC&N ALLEGED TO SUPPORT EPSTEIN'S CLAIMS AGAINST. + +Counter-Plaintiff J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion in Limine to Lim' Ihti ction of Evidence alleged to support Epstein's claims against to er tpon which it is established that Epstein reasonably relied in filing or continuing thirtose ion of claims against M, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- I. Epstein's counsel has made it abundantly clear that Epstein, as a party, will neither N be appearing not testifying at trial. +- 2. Epstein filed his malicious lawsuit against on December 7, 2009, and evidence unknown to Epstein at the time of his filing could not possibly have supported probable cause. +- 3. Epstein was deposed on March 17, 2010 and was questioned extensively regarding probable cause. + +privilege. 4. The date of that deposition is the cut-off for any information Epstein's counsel can allege that their client relied upon in either instituting or continuing the lawsuit against M, since the deposition is the only possible source of testimony from the absent party, and because Epstein effectively precluded discovery into the probable cause issue through by aertions of S + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA0408003OCaMBAG Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims Against + +5. Therefore, absent Epstein's testimony at trial and ass dmission of his deposition testimony, the only information that Epstein's counsel presumption that he lacked probable cause for instituting continuing the lawsuit is the information that Epstei 2010 deposition. A review of the deposition tran sources of information: (1) newspapers'; Complaint"; and (5) the Decembert o, troduce to rebut the t on December 7, 2009 and o relying upon at his March 17, Is that Epstein mentioned the following ; (3) Bob Norman's blog3; (4) the "Scherer ctment against Rothstein. Of course, not a single one of these sources of information n the name or implies that had any connection wha ver to othstein's illegal activities. + +6. Eps ( tc is 6 fore barred from introducing any other evidence, including any evidence that ot covered or learned until after March 17, 2010, as purported support for his prob to institute or continue the lawsuit against . This would include, but would not limited to, online news articles and any discovery obtained after March 17, 2010 + +Eg" 3/17/10 Dep. Tr. at 67:14-21 (Epstein only mentioned that he read about Rothstein's Ponzi scheme in "newspapers" generally. He did not identify specific newspapers. More importantly, he did not mention reading any online news articles, which prevents the introduction of or reference to any such articles at trial.) + +2 See 3/17/10 Dep. Tr. at 67:14-21 (also a general reference). + +ate 3/17/10 Dep. Tr. at 39:7-10. + +ag, 3/17/10 Dep. Tr. at 53:6-21. + +5Es, 3/17/10 Dep. Tr. at 53:6-19 + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims Against + +from the RRA bankruptcy trustee, such as RRA firm emails. Epstein cannot claim to have relied upon this information after it was provided by his attorneys either, as Epstein has not raised the advice of counsel defense and has instead maintained his attorney-client privilege precluding discovery into all communications between Epstein and his attorneys. t ore has had no ability to cross-examine Epstein on this issue. Having chosen to block disc lZa ry into sources of information upon which Epstein might have relied, Epstein is prevented, er through crossexamination or otherwise, from attempting to introduce evidence o probable cause through any documents or evidence that Epstein has not prey testified to relying upon in support of his lawsuit. + +7. Regarding Epstein's failure to d e of counsel as a defense, Epstein should be barred from introducing any deposition e ti or interrogatory answers to which he invokes attorney-client privilege. IMM 'e iling dated December 4, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 'A', outlines the disc ery nses at issue. The reason to preclude Epstein from introducing any of this ' ence is simple: by invoking attorney-client privilege to questions regarding what Epstein reli upon to support probable cause to institute and continue the civil ( proceeding a finding ards, Epstein implies that his lawyers provided information to support a e cause. However, Epstein has declined to raise advice of counsel as a defense and has continued to assert attorney-client privilege, therefore barring from testing this assertion. Epstein's conduct is therefore a classic example of using a privilege as both a shield and a sword, which is barred under black-letter Florida law. E.g. Savino v. Luciano. 92 So. 2d 817, 819 (Fla. 1957). + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims Against + +8. In tandem with this request, further requests that the Court bar Epstein from any commentary regarding the reputation of Epstein's attorneys or the fact that the lawsuit was filed by attorneys, references that are clearly irrelevant for any purpose except to suggest that the filing and continued prosecution of claims against was the decis..:, .,r respected attorneys upon whom Epstein relied. Any such argument is a nefarious attem implicitly raise advice of counsel as a defense, and is a classic sword-shield argument (") ha ed under Florida law. See id. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff Edwar Ily requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion in Limine to Li trOduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims against Edw I as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just given the circumst + +t I HEREBY CERTIFY that e correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached I\* thi d. of March, 2018. + +Is/ David P. Vitale, Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims +Against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +cos + +#### NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSC RESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLC- 's, RPTS AND DISCOVERY HE FIFTH AMENDMENT + +Counter-Plaintiff, y d As: s through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript..,Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment' ndras \grounds therefor states as follows: + +#### Summary + +At the Novembet l os,017 pre-trial hearing, the Court requested that Counter-Plaintiff J. Edwar specifi Ily identify the discovery responses provided by Jeffrey Epstein that implicate th Pt endment privilege. This Notice of Filing outlines the specific questions and answers s in's March 17, 2010 and January 25, 2012 deposition testimony in which Epstein raised the rivilege, and which proffers for introduction at trial. This Notice of Filing further provides citations to Epstein's Answers to Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010 and + +At times, Epstein also raised his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights. For ease of review, simply refers to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. + +![](_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg) + +December 21, 2012, and responses to Requests for Admission dated February 26, 2013 which + +also proffers for introduction at trial. + +## I. MARCH 17, 2010 DEPOSITION cos + +#### a. Page 8, Lines I 1-19 + +Q. When and under what circumstances did you first meet the individual referenced by the initials L.M,? + +A. Mr. Scarola, 1 think you are aware these questions are simply designed to have me invoke my F, Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendme, relation to other questions and other cases filed. But in response to your question, I'm going ?tos e have to invoke my right not to testify. + +#### b. Page 8, lines 20-25 + +Q. Do you know the individualCI L.M., identified by the initials 9 + +A. Mr. Scarola, a answer that que Counsel, question. -- 1 would like to owever, today, on advice of ave to refuse to answer that + +Q. Have you ever acknowledged in presence that you liked L.M.? + +A. Again, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +#### d. Page 12. lines 2-13 + +Q. Have you ever acknowledged in the presence of Terri Becker, a court reporter present at a deposition taken by Brad in a -- in a case in which the individual identified by the initials L.M. was a Plaintiff that you knew and/or liked — + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: Again, — + +BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. - L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Same objection. + +THE WITNESS: Again, I'm going to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th A + +Q. Have you ever owl t ged ill'? in the presence of Steve Jaffe that o ew and/or liked L.M.? + +A. Agai la, though I'd like to answer each e of your questions today, I'm going to have to, t e advice of Counsel, invoke my Fifth, Sixth and 4th Amendment Right. + +#### f. Page 15. lines 13-19 + +Q. Okay. Well, let's -- let me rephrase the question then. Is it your contention that L.M.'s statement to cos + +#### e. Page 12. lines 15 + +the FBI was true? + +A. Sir, on advice of Counsel, at least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +g. Page 15. lines 20-24 + +Q. Was L.M.'s statement to the FBI false in any respect? + +A. Sir, at least, again, today, on advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth \, 14th Amendment Right. + +h. Pane 17. Line 11-16 + +Q. Did you engage -- ever engagE4n y xual conduct with L.M.? + +A. I would like to answ today I'm going to have by the Fifth, Six sir. question; however, my rights as provided 14 Amendment to that question, + +lines 17-22 + +Q. Have you ever exchanged anything of value with L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +Go + +j. Page 17-18, lines 24-4 + +Q. Did you ever direct anyone to deliver anything of value to L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least today, I'm going to have to refuse to answer that question based on the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +k. Pane 18, lines 6-10 + +Q. Do you know Carolyn An + +A. At least today, sir, I'm goin to ha a to refuse to testify about that ques ased on advice of Counsel, I'm going to t Ito assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Ri ?s, + +I. P es 11-16 + +Q. Did yn introduce you to L.M.? + +A. Sir, respectfully, I'd like to answer that question today. As I said, I'd like to answer each and every one of your questions. However, on advice of my Counsel today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +Go + +m. Page 18. Line 23 through Page 19, Line 5; + +Q. Did L.M. suffer any damage as a consequence of any interaction between you and L.M.? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: I'd like to answer each and every one of your questions here today, Mr. Scarola; however, on advice of Counsel, today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +n. Page 34, Line 23 through Pare 35. Line 11; + +Q. Specifically what are the alle ations aga you which you contend Mr. gi + +A. I would like to answer that , many of the files and documents that ted from Mr. and the Rothstein still unavailable. + +With respect to anything today, I'm, unfortunately, Fifth Amendmenta'ti that, I can point to to have to take the xth and 14th. + +Q. I want iK know whether when you use the phrase "gin up" and the word "crafted," which you have told us is synonymous with gin up, -- + +A. Yes. + +Q. — you mean fabricated? + +A. I'm sorry. On advice of Counsel, sir, and + +I've answered that question before, but if you didn't hear me the first time, I must assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +p. Panes 36-37. lines 10-7 + +Q. What discovery proceedings did Mr. engage in which you contend fonn the basis for your lawsuit? + +A. The discovery proceedings of bringing my attorneys to various people that had nothing to do with any of his clients or these lawsuits. + +Q. Which various people? Who? + +MR. PIKE: Form. ?S' + +THE WITNESS: For example, he ed "%o se Pl Bill Clinton, strictly as a means publicity so that he and his fi fraudulently steal, craft money uspecting investors in South Florid>wut of millions of dollars. + +BY MR. SCAR + +Q. Who els your refe Clinton is included in rious people? + +A. Ther2 people in California. There are people in ew York. + +Q. Would you name them for us, please? + +A. Pm sorry. Sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, Pm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. + +q. Page 38, lines 23-25 through Page 39. lines 1-6 + +Q. I had asked you earlier whether ginned up and crafted meant fabricated and you asserted your Fifth Amendment privilege. + +Are you now telling us that there were claims against you that were fabricated by Mr. + +A. I'm going to again assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +I would respond that the newspapers are very clear that the cases were fabricated. + +r. Page 39, lines 13-20 + +Q. Well, which of Mr. cases do yotic\ contend were fabricated? + +A. Again, we've requested most of, information from the bankrupt eve been unable -- Mr. has not iven the total file, but respect to any individual, I have — at the moment I would have tort my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment claim, sir. + +e + +21-25 through Page 40.1ine 1 + +Q. Soy wt not answer questions about whether the claim behalf of L.M. was fabricated; is that correct? + +A. I believe I've already answered that, but, if again, I'll have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, sir. + +#### t. Page 40. lines 2-12 + +Q. Your Complaint also makes reference to a claim on behalf of Jane Doe, referred to as Jane Doe versus Epstein, case number 08-CIV-80893, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. + +Is it your contention that the claim on behalf of Jane Doe is a fabricated claim? + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question, as well as every one of your other questions here today, today I'm going to have to assert my rights as under the Constitution of the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. A\ + +#### u. Page 40. lines 17-21 + +Q. Did you ever have personal contac person referred to by the name Jan ?S' in at lawsuit? + +A. I'm sorry, sir. Sitting here t to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth Right. oing 4th Amendment + +#### v. Page es it -25 through Page 41. lines 1-3 + +Q. W as Jane first meet the person referred to + +A. Sir, though Pd like to answer each and every one of your questions here today, at least with respect to that question, I'm going to have to assert my rights under the Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth Amendment. + +Cos + +w. Page 41, lines 4-9 + +Q. Where did you first meet the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answer that question here today, at least today on advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Right. CO'S-A + +x. Page 41, lines 10-19 + +Q. How many times have you been in the physical iS 4)C) presence of the person referred to as Jane Doe? + +A. The person referred to as Jane Doe? + +Q. Yeah. How many times have you physical presence? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At leas t least sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I g g to have to assert my Fifth AShdmen Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment Ri + +lines 3-13 + +Q. You have alleged in your Complaint that there is a claim on behalf of Jane Doe versus Epstein pending in the Federal District Court of the Southern District of Florida. + +I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that Complaint? + +A. Ah, that Jane Doe. I'm sorry. But sitting here today, Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to refuse to answer that question based on the Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment. + +## z. Page 42, lines 13-18 CO ' + +Q. Did you ever exchange any money or gifts with Jane Doe? + +Amendment, Fifth Amendment and 14th Am en ' ' r?AC) A. Again, Mr. Scarola, sitting here today, Pm going to have to on advice of Counsel assert my Si + +Q. Have you ever socialized with the presence of females under + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: At least a the typical to the con non of nging cases of a malicious nature his partner sits in jail for this -- just havior, the answer is, today, at st assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Right, though I'd like to answer each an very one of your questions, Mr. Scarola. + +pp. Page 93. Lines 6-16; + +Q. Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield in the presence of females under the age of 18? + +A. I'm sure, again, this question is a typical + +question of Mr. [REDACTED] /Rothstein scheme to defraud investors, asking questions knowing it serves no purpose or relationship relevance to their case whatsoever. At least today, though I'd like to answer that question, on advice of my Counsel, and only on advice of my Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. +MR. PIKE: Form as well. + +qq. Page 95, lines 16-25 through Page 96, lines 1-3 + +Q. Have you ever sexually abused children? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, and only upon advice of Counsel, though I'd like to answer that question, as well as every other one of your claims brought by Mr. [REDACTED] and his partner, who currently sits in jail, sir, I would like to answer those questions. But today at least, I have to assert my Sixth Amendment, 14th Amendment and Fifth Amendment Right. Though I'd prefer to answer the question, I'm told by my Counsel that if I choose to do so, which is my preference, I risk losing their representation. + +rr. Page 97, Lines 23-25 through Page 98, Lines 1-9; + +Q. Did you have staff members that assisted you in scheduling appointments with underage females; that is, females under the age of 18? + +A. So along with many of the other claims that the Rothstein firm crafted with malicious claims against people like me and others of a sexually charged nature in order to simply fleece investors out of millions of + +dollars in South Florida, these types of questions, though Pd like to answer today, at least this specific question, I'm going to have to assert, unfortunately, my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right, though I'd prefer to answer the question. + +ss. Page 104. Line 3-9 through 20; + +Q. How many minors have you procured for prostitution? + +iS 5 + +MR. PIKE: Form + +) + +THE WITNESS: On advice of Counsel, sir, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14 Amendment Right, though I pled guilty to ping a single minor. + +S LIP' + +Q. Yes, but my question izis't s C about what you pled guilty to. I just want w how many minors you have procured fo rostitut n. + +tt. Page 104. lines 11-20 + +MR. PIKE: answered. + +THE Again, at least with respect to what I'v guilty to, I pled guilty to procuring single minor. + +With respect to the rest of your question, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights as provided by my Counsel. + +uu. Page 106. Lines 7 through 10; + +Q. I want to know whether you pled guilty because you were, in fact, guilty. + +A. I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +vv. Page 107. lines 20-25 through page 10\$. lines 1-6 + +) + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +"SC) + +Q. Have you ever coerced, induced or enticed any minor to engage in any sexual act with you? + +THE WITNESS: A typical question from + +Mr. Scarola representing Mr. and of Rothstein, who Scott Rothstein sits i crafting cases of a sexual nature agai South Florida, me and others, the e y be determined. However, today, h e to answer every one of his questi s, o a vice of Counsel, at least today, I'm goi ye to assert my Fifth, Sixth anima Amendment Right. + +ww. ?S lines 8-23 + +Q. H tines have you engaged in fondling underag emales? + +MR. PIKE: Form. + +THE WITNESS: This is relevance here at some point? + +MR. PIKE: To the extent you can answer the question. + +O AS + +THE WITNESS: Again, as another one of the irrelevant questions asked of this lawsuit with respect as a client how I was abused by the Rothstein firm for his -- the practices, the abuse of the legal system, the -- hopefully, the ladies and gentlemen of the jury will be able to see through some of these ridiculous questions with respect to questions that today, at least, I must take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, but I believe are obvious to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury what you're trying to do here, Mr. Scarola. + +xx. Page 109, lines 5-17 + +Q. How many times have you engaged in illegal sexual touching of minors? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Relevance. + +THE WITNESS: Again, an irrelevant question to this lawsuit, strictly as a continued attempt to bring in irrelevant facts to the fact of what the Rothstein firm has done to both me and others in South Florida, defrauding investors of millions of dollars, knowing that at least today I'm going to have to with respect to that particular question assert my Fourth -- excuse me -- Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Rights. + +MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike as unresponsive. + +yy. Page 111, lines 3-4, 18-20 + +Q. Do you have a personal sexual preference for children? + +... Mr. Scarola, I'm going to have to, unfortunately, take the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +zz. Page III, lines 23-24, Page 112, lines 13-17 + +Q. Have you ever acted on a sexual preference for children? + +MR. PIKE: Form. Irrelevant. Abusive. Harassing. And not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence in this case. + +THE WITNESS: ... + +I'd like to answer all of your questions here today, Mr. Scarola, even though they're irre however, on advice of Counsel, at least going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixt Amendment Right. + +aaa. Parte 112. • 22-25 through Page 113. lines 1-8 + +Q. Your Complaint age 27, paragraph 49, says that: "RRA ation team took an emotionally driven se volving alleged innocent, unsus • erage females and a Palm Beach billiona an sought to turn it into a gold mine," end of quo + +Who is the Palm Beach billionaire referred to in that sentence? + +A. On advice of Counsel today, Mr. Scarola, though I would like to answer each one of your questions, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +bbb. Page 113, lines 9-25 + +Q. What is the emotionally driven set of facts to which you make reference in that sentence? + +A. It's the same set of facts that were used by the Rothstein firm to fleece unsuspecting investors out of millions of dollars, crafting, fabricating malicious cases of a sexually charged nature with no fundamental basis whatsoever, reported wildly by the press. The U.S. Attorney has accused Mr. [REDACTED] partner of not -- excuse me -- Mr. [REDACTED] partner sits currently in jail, pled guilty to some of these charges. There are other members of his firm under investigation for just these types of questions and fabrications. + +But, however, today, though I'd like to answer every one of your questions with specificity, on advice of Counsel I'm not going to be able to, Mr. Scarola, and respectfully decline based on my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment Right. + +ccc. Page 114, Line 25 through Page 115, Line 13; + +Q. Quote, "rather than evaluating and resolving The cases based on the merits, that is, facts which included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by each of the claimants." + +A. Yes. + +... + +Q. What are their names? + +A. I think the prostitutes' names were -- the prostitute that you described before was L.M. With respect to the others, I'm going to have + +to claim the Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment, sir. + +ddd. Page 115. lines 21-25 through Page 116. line I + +Q. Okay. So one of the people that you're referring to is L.M., who you've identified as L.M.; is that correct? + +A. With respect to that question, sir, on advice of Counsel, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment. + +eee. Pagc 116, lines 2-7 + +Q. What are the voluntary and consensu by L.M. that you are referencing the + +A. Sir, though I'd like to answe Itybf your questions here today, I'm otng ave to respectfully decline based on a of my Counsel, and have to assert my Fifth, ' and 14th Amendment Right. + +ffit:Pa S in 15 through Page 129. Line 3 + +Q. Is filed a to be fals mg in L.M.'s Complaint that was st you in September of 2008 which you contend + +THE WITNESS: I recognize, Mr. , again, the concept of attempting me to get to waive my Fifth Amendment privilege; however, in this lawsuit I've answered questions with respect to your lawsuit. And with regard to the question you just asked, Fm going to have to, unfortunately, assert + +Cos + +my Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th + +Amendment Right. + +But Pm willing to listen to any other questions you may have. + +# II. JANUARY 25, 2012 DEPOSITION O S + +- a. Page 8. lines 9-21 + +Q Have you ever been convicted of a crime? + +A Yes. + +Q What was the crime of which you were "S C) convicted? + +A Two counts, one soliciting prostitution, and procuring a minor for prostitution. + +Q Did you, in fact, commit those + +MR. GOLDBERGER: I can i oke t fifth Amendment privilege for you o can invoke it yourself. I prefer you • ke the privilege. + +THE WITNESS. Amendment oing to invoke my Fifth + +- b. Pa + +Q How many times have you solicited a minor for prostitution in the State of Florida? + +A Same answer. + +c. Pace 11, line 22 through Page 12. line 7 + +Q Have you ever solicited a minor for prostitution anywhere at any time? + +A Same answer. + +Q Who is the prostitute that you solicited for prostitution with respect to the claim on which you were convicted? + +A Same answer. + +Q Who is the minor that you solicited for prostitution with respect to the claim on which yo pled guilty? + +A Same answer. + +d. Page 12, lines 16 through + +Q Where was it that you soli prostitution in the manner you pled guilty? e matter in which + +A Same answer + +Q When w at you solicited for pros u e matter in which you pled guilty? + +A Sa answer. + +Q Have you ever discussed your sex-related arrest or conviction with any reporter or news media representative? + +MR. KNIGHT: I'm going to instruct you not to answer the question. + +MR. SCAROLA: Well, what is it then? MR. KNIGHT: No, it goes beyond relevancy. ? s, + +MR. KNIGHT: Well, it is harass used — it is being used to intimi witness. It is being used for v different reasons. And I believ improper. + +BY MR. SCARO + +Q Have you e activities wi any repo cussed your sex-related the State of Florida with s media representative? + +MR. SCAROLA: And what is the basis of that instruction? + +MR. KNIGHT: What is the basis? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +MR. KNIGHT: What does it have to do with this lawsuit? It's for no other reason other than to harass him. There are plenty of areas you can go into which are reasonable. We are here. + +MR. SCAROLA: So the objection is relevancy, is that correct? + +MR. : Same instruction. We are going to e a quick break if we can go off the record. + +e. Page 21. lines 6-22 + +Q Were the allegations in the federal complaint on behalf of LM any different than the allegations in the state court case on behalf of LM? + +A I don't recall. + +Q Did you, in fact, engage in any sexual conduct with LM? + +A I'm sorry, but I'm sure -- the jury is going to recognize this is simply meant to harass me, and I'll have to take the Fifth Amendment since your client, Mr. is flying to overturn my prosecution agreement. + +Q How many times did you engage in sexual conduct with LM? + +A I'm going to have to invoke my Fifth Amendment right again, sir. + +Q Do you know who LM is? + +A Again I'm going to assert my riZ it-Stut e , + +#### III. EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS? OGENERAL INTERROGATORIES \_,DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +2. What is yo t estimate of the number of minor females\* with whom you have sical contact in the last 10 years, when at the time of the physical contact: + +- your genitals were exposed +b. the genitals or breasts of the minor female were exposed + - c. the minor female was clothed only in underwear + +• &quot; minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under I8 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have reason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +- 3. What is your best estimate of the number of times in the last 10 years when you have had physical contact with minor females when at the time of the physical contact: .M.. + - a. your genitals were exposed + - b. the genitals or breasts of the minor female wer expose + - c. the minor female was clothed only in un r +- 4. What is your best estimate of the number ti s have witnessed Ghislaine Maxwell engage in sexual activity' emales? +- 5. What is the total obligation th as e incurred to date for both fees and costs (both paid and currently g) i onnection with your representation in this lawsuit? +- 6. With regard to e las time you engaged in sexual activity with a minor, state the following +- a. S t ty of the minor (name and last known address) the date 7\ the location + - d. a description of the sexual activity + - 8. Describe in your own words all interaction you have had with the individual identified in this action as L.M., including but not limited to the dates, places, + +&#x27; "sexual activity" for purposes of these interrogatories means any physical contact with the genitals or exposed breasts of another person. + +participants in, witnesses to, and a description of all sexual activity involving + +L.M. + +- 9. What is the name and last known address of eery healthcare ro er with whom you have treated or been evaluated for any sexual diso er? + +ANSWER: With regard to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, & , the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant objects because the interrogatories levant information, are 43 burdensome, are propounded for the purpo 1/4 f'NjZsment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Amend s e United States Constitution. + +IIIS + +#### IV. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED \* SES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES DECEMBER 21, 2012 + +- 3. State the amo ur current annual income from all sources for each of the past 3 y and describe all additional benefits received by you or payable to you for each ast 3,s including bonuses, allowances, pension and profit sh g pa pations, options, deferred compensation, insurance benefits er prerequisites of your employment including the dollar amount or dollar each. +If you own or have any beneficial interest in any stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other securities of any class in any government, governmental organization, company, firm or corporation, whether foreign or domestic, please state: + - (a) The name and address of the entity in which you own or have any beneficial property or security interest of any sort; + - (b) The date and cost of acquisition; + - (c) The current fair market value of each such interest; + - (d) The manner in which such value was calculated. + +1. 5. As to each income tax return filed by you or on your behalf with any taxing authority for the years 2009 through 2012, identify as specifically as identified in your tax return the source of all reported income and the separate amounts derived from each source +2. 6. For each parcel of real property in which you hold any interest, state: + 1. (a) The address, + 2. (b) The legal description of the property; + 3. (c) The assessed value of the property for tax purposes; + 4. (d) The date and price of acquisition; + 5. (e) Whether, when, by whom, why and at what amount the property has been appraised since the time of purchase; + 6. (f) Whether, when, and at what price the property has been offered for sale since the time of purchase; + 7. (g) The name and address of each real estate agent with whom the property has been listed for sale since the time of purchase; + 8. (h) The cost of any improvements made to the property since purchase; + 9. (i) The nature of your interest in the property. + 10. (j) The current fair market value of the property and a description of the manner in which that value was calculated +3. 7. List each item and state the estimated value of all personal tangible, and intangible property in which you have an interest which personal property was acquired at a cost in excess of \$10,000 or which personal property has an estimated present value in excess of \$10,000, and as to each state: + 1. (a) The date of acquisition; + 2. (b) The cost of acquisition; + 3. (c) The current estimated fair market value; + 4. (d) The manner in which the fair market value was estimated. +4. 8. If any of the real or personal property owned by you, either individually, jointly or otherwise, is encumbered by either a real estate mortgage, chattel mortgage, or any other type of lien, then for each item of property, state a description of the nature and amount of the encumbrance, the date the encumbrance arose, whether the encumbrance is evidenced by any written document and, if so, a description of that document. + +- 9. If you have an ownership interest in any businesses, for each business state: + - (a) The name and address of the business; + - (b) The present book value and the present market value of your ingest in the business, and its percentage of the total value of the business. + - (c) A description of the manner in which the stated fair t value was calculated. +- 10. Identify all banks, credit union and savings and loan a hich you have an interest or right of withdrawal and for each account + - (a) Where the account is located; + - (b) The highest and lowest balance in the a dunng the 365 day period immediately preceding your receipt or rrogatories. +- 11. Identify all other assets of a value in exc, c 1,000 which assets were not previously identified and as to each s + - (a) The date of acquisition; + - (c) The current estima \. E t value; + - (b) The cost of acquisition; + - (d) The means utilize the current fair market value. +- 12. Identify all othe, identified and +- (a) The date of an amount in excess of \$10,000 not previously ate: bility arose; + - (b) ount of the liability at inception; + - (c) Th of repayment or satisfaction; + - (d) " The nt outstanding balance. + - (a) the date of the calculation or estimate; ediately preceding your receipt of these interrogatories, state: any calculation or estimate of your net worth at any time in the five years + - (b) the name and address of the person or entity responsible for performing the work + - (c) the reason for performing the calculation or estimate; + - (d) the amount of net worth calculated or estimated +- 15. As to all transfers of anything of a value in excess of \$10,000 made by you or on your behalf within the past 5 years, state: + - (a) a description of the transferred property; + +- (b) the reason for the transfer; +- (c) the value of the item(s) transferred at the time of transfer; +- (d) the date and cost of your acquisition of the item(s); +- (e) whether you received anything of value in exchange for the item(s) and, if so, a description of what you received and of what you received; (ft the name and address of the recipient of each transfe rred alue + +Epstein asserted the same form objections in response to each nu errogatory, + +which raises his Fifth Amendment privilege: + +ANSWER: Objection. This Interrogatory requires t ion of detailed financial information which communicates state nt o ct. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391,410 (1976). I have a subs n arid reasonable basis for concern that these statements of fact that a tt timonial in nature and could reasonably furnish a "line the chaili o evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in a criminal pr 479, 486 (1951). I cannot my financial history a Fourteenth Amend Constitution. dingsrSee Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. [de answers/responses to questions relating to ion without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and is as guaranteed by the United States + +("A' I + +#### V. RESPONSES TO REOLJEBTS FOR ADMISSION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2013 + +Epstein asserted his F ! ItAmendment - privilege to the following Requests for Admission t dated February + +- 3. A ou have never publicly disputed the description of you as a billionaire. at you have never publicly disputed any press reports describing to you as a billionaire. +- 5. Admit that you are a billionaire. +- 6. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 5 years. +- 7. Admit that you have been a billionaire sometime within the past 10 years. + +- 8. Admit that you have a reputation as being a billionaire. +- 9. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a billion dollars at times duri the past 5 years. +- 10. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded half a billion doll during the past 5 years. +- 11. Admit that your personal net worth has exceeded a qua during the past 5 years. +- 12. Admit that you have never paid even one pe Accit 0 I has alleged that you engaged in impro S, ua ontact with them while that person was a minor. A +- 13. Admit that you have never iik rie one day in a state or federal prison facility (as opposed to a county jai as pin shment for any sex-related crimes. aca bt to dollars at times we damages to any person who + +Specifically, the it tical ir form objection asserted by Epstein in response to each numbered + +Request for ssion as as follows: + +Obj s Request for Admission requires a response which cokn tes statements of fact. Fisher v. United States, 425 U,S, 391, 410 916 have substantial and reasonable basis for concern that these tements of fact that are testimonial in nature could reasonably furnish a link in the chain of evidence" that could be used to prosecute me in criminal proceedings." See Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). I cannot provide answers/responses relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of December, 2017. + +/c/ lark grarnin + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: jsxr y w.com and + +mmccann®searcyla + +Primary E-Mail: r. T ®searcylaw.com + +Seamy Denne t. amhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Boulevard + +West Pal c lorida 33409 + +Phone 6 -6300 + +Faxes (56 83-9451 + ++6s + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth + +Amendment + +Page 35 of 36 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Jeffrey Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment + +Page 36 of 36 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..674888b1764d0eaf92ad654628e2253423ab85d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/EFTA02765145.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2106 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 41, + "chars": 46440, + "elapsed_seconds": 25.97, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 112.863037109375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT THE INTRODUC&N ALLEGED \nTO SUPPORT EPSTEIN'S CLAIMS AGAINST.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 528.3764038085938, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 528.3764038085938, + 356.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 356.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 132.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.7418212890625, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.7418212890625, + 124.353515625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 124.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSC \nRESPONSES BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN IMPLC-\n's,\nRPTS AND DISCOVERY \nHE FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 518.8070678710938, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 518.8070678710938, + 373.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 373.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 331.16436767578125, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 331.16436767578125, + 469.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 469.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. MARCH 17, 2010 DEPOSITION \ncos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 494.4651184082031, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 494.4651184082031, + 292.20989990234375 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 292.20989990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Page 8, Lines I 1-19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.248, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 210.31944274902344, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 210.31944274902344, + 257.853515625 + ], + [ + 94.248, + 257.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Page 8, lines 20-25", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 205.4083251953125, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 205.4083251953125, + 456.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 456.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 587.25 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 587.25 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 600.21 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 600.21 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Page 12. lines 2-13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 207.81842041015625, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 207.81842041015625, + 230.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 230.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f. Page 15. lines 13-19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 639.9000000000001 + ], + [ + 210.82989501953125, + 639.9000000000001 + ], + [ + 210.82989501953125, + 655.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 655.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Page 12. lines 15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 481.14 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 481.14 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 496.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 496.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "t. Page 40. lines 2-12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 205.78822326660156, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 205.78822326660156, + 177.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 177.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "u. Page 40. lines 17-21", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 210.47108459472656, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 210.47108459472656, + 403.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 403.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "v. Page es it -25 through Page 41. lines 1-3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 333.779052734375, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 333.779052734375, + 549.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 549.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "z. Page 42, lines 13-18 CO '", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 265.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 474.8464050292969, + 265.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 474.8464050292969, + 284.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 284.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "aa. Page 42. lines 19-25 through P, te 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 319.7330627441406, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 319.7330627441406, + 430.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 430.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "bb. Page 44, Lines 3-7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 614.79 + ], + [ + 201.97235107421875, + 614.79 + ], + [ + 201.97235107421875, + 629.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 629.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Page 46, lines 1-15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 207.7687530517578, + 229.23 + ], + [ + 207.7687530517578, + 244.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 244.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "j.i. lin- 2-17", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 211.85220336914062, + 574.29 + ], + [ + 211.85220336914062, + 591.8035125732422 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 591.8035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "11. Page 89. Lines 4-10;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.636, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 216.12217712402344, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 216.12217712402344, + 455.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 93.636, + 455.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. JANUARY 25, 2012 DEPOSITION O S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.572, + 215.46966552734375 + ], + [ + 480.3273620605469, + 215.46966552734375 + ], + [ + 480.3273620605469, + 270.06158447265625 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 270.06158447265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS? OGENERAL INTERROGATORIES \n_,DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 522.8748779296875, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 522.8748779296875, + 482.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 482.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. EPSTEIN'S AMENDED * SES TO NET WORTH INTERROGATORIES \nDECEMBER 21, 2012", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.844, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 526.2160034179688, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 526.2160034179688, + 452.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 83.844, + 452.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "V. RESPONSES TO REOLJEBTS FOR ADMISSION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2013", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 523.5847778320312, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 523.5847778320312, + 481.9335632324219 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 481.9335632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 175.76999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765145" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d321681546342a7fead073f6938dd9d38e7e23f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765145/_page_5_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c07bb860d6ed2538636d210f99f9b851c07a2cd940b3ab4370459f5fb1adbd36 +size 7670 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..489da1f772660b9f6d1a24883b59c1f42852e4d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.md @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT THALcps id. ividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +cos + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED th \undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 7, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie,Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 104) + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion to Compel [filed 2.26.18 re: Epstein's responses to Requests for Admissions] + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx @searcylaw.com; and +mjmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-8451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] Edwards + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +“If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.” + +“Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, , por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o immediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711.” + +“Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711.” + +Rev: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32ae9ac495afbb0fb5200da8e7662de28cf528cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186/EFTA02765186.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765186.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4856, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 357.21000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 278.62847900390625, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 278.62847900390625, + 575.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 575.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765186" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89e8f9cd96a5844ac44dd9c25686dec4ec4c9c01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +04 + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t e tuMersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 12, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. /C)ACCLe + +JUDGE: Honorable-Donaldonal~ele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Jeffrey Epstein's Motion in Limine As to Sex offender Registry Information [filed 2.8.18] + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of March, 2018. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] Edwards + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact , Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 day;; if you are hearing or voice impaired, «dl 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algån acomodamiento para ff oder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener ga tos p rnpios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de pone en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo meno dia tes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatam te espués de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecen e se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del of l) voz, Dame al 711." + +-Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomod o w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou kfr y pwovizyon pou jwen kék éd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat otioe n evou pou parét nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resemftorSok syon an si lé ou gen pou w patt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen p4olt pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +eiS t + +i ii.) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2a08418a7685b55a2c0eae869650004d85a81a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191/EFTA02765191.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765191.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4873, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.50537109375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.50537109375, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 356.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 280.12847900390625, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 280.12847900390625, + 574.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 574.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765191" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15f63142c11c59a527381393fdc9b944e594c103 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.md @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE t.ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOO4BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +# SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR SEPARATE T AQ IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ADJUST THE ORD OOF + +Counter-Plaintiff and 1.440, hereby files this Supplement Adjust the Order of Proof, and as Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.270 `lion u1 or Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to reof states as follows: + +## ( j14/ Summary + +Epstein is attem g to for a damages-only claim regarding a clerk's default entered against Defendant c ths tins on January 21, 2010. As the Court will see, however, that clerk's default was a t the Initial Complaint. Epstein has since amended his complaint twice and has ab every count pled against Rothstein in the Initial Complaint. Thus, in addition to the re set forth in Motion to Separate Trials, the Court should sever Epstein's claim against Rothstein because the only pending claim against Rothstein is a Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process count contained in the Second Amended Pleading, to which no default has been entered and which has not been set for trial. + +## Supplement + +I. Epstein filed his Initial Complaint against Defendant Rothstein on December 7, 2009, which pled the following counts against Rothstein: + +- a. (1) Violation of § 772,101 Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Prac \*ces Act +- b. (2) Violation of § 895.01 Florida's RICO Act +- c. (3) Abuse of Process +- d. (4) Fraud +- e. (5) Conspiracy to Commit Fraud IS' + +2. On January 21, 2010, a clerk's default was entered ag 0mst ndant Rothstein as to the Initial Complaint and the five counts listed above (see A). + +3. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an a omplaint against Defendant Rothstein. The Amended Complaint asserted a si e gainst Defendant Rothstein, Abuse of Process. The remaining counts against o in the Initial Complaint (Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, CO Act, Fraud, and Conspiracy to Commit Fraud), were abandoned. + +4. Pursuant to bla le r Florida law, the Amended Complaint against Rothstein superseded the Initial Co r . Ss& State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Higgins 788 So. 2d 992, 995 (Fla. 4th DCA 20Q approved, 894 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2004) ("An amended complaint supersedes an earlier plc ding tero it does not express an intention to save any portion of the original pleading)) tn ernal quotations omitted); accord Downtown Investments, Ltd. v. Segall, 551 So. 2d 561, 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Moreover, the Initial Complaint against Rothstein was not only superseded, but "ceased to be a part of the record" in Epstein's case against him. Babb v. Lincoln Auto Finance Co.,133 So. 2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (emphasis added). + +5. Thus, although a tenuous argument remained that the clerk's default applied to the Abuse of Process claim that was re-pled, the clerk's default as to the four abandoned counts in an inoperative pleading that was no longer part of the record was now a nullity. + +6. On August 21, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Compl Ar\8int 0, against Defendant Rothstein. In his Second Amended Complaint, which superse t mended Complaint, Epstein abandoned his Abuse of Process claim against Roths tead asserted a brand-new count: Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process. + +7. Thus, Epstein had now abandoned every cou in the Initial Complaint to which the clerk's default applied. The clerk's default w a nullity. + +8. No default has been entered ag as to the Second Amended Complaint, which is the operative pleading icauns party, and the brand-new Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process count contai ereiti. + +9. Moreover, even if ere to proceed without a default as to liability, the Second Amended Complaint h of een noticed for trial. Pursuant to Rule 1.440, the Court may not set Epstein's Conspira mmit Abuse of Process case for trial against Rothstein without first entering an fixing the date for that trial, which "shall be set not less than 30 days from the service ice for trial." + +iven that the damages being sought by Epstein against Rothstein for Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process are unliquidated, it would be reversible error for the Court to permit Epstein to try his case against Rothstein on March 13th. Wells Fargo Bank. Nat. Ass'n v. Sawh, 194 So. 3d 475, 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ([T]he setting of unliquidated damages without the required notice and without proof is regarded as fundamental error."). + +**Conclusion** + +Thus, in addition to the reasons set forth in [REDACTED] Motion to Separate Trials, et al, the Court should grant that Motion for the reasons stated above. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2nd day of March, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No. 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +Supplement to Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 "S C) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +njs©FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt i teLaw.com + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite + +West Palm Beach, FL 3 01 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for Brad J. + +J. uire + +staff.efil toj tice.com + +425 N enue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lau ,FL 33301 + +Phone: (95 524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH +COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Division: AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN +Plaintiff(s), + +-VS- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████ individually +and L.M. individually +Defendant(s), + +FILED +2010 JAN 21 AM 10:01 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +MEACH BOOK PAY 2 + +**DEFAULT** + +A default is entered in the above styled cause against: **SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually** for failure to serve a pleading at the time required by law. + +DONE AND ORDERED at the Clerk's Office, City of West Palm Beach, this 21 day of JANUARY, 2010. + +Sharon R. Bock +Clerk & Comptroller + +By: Kimberly Bradley +KIMBERLY BRADLEY +Deputy Clerk + +![](_page_5_Picture_26.jpeg) + +Copies furnished as BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN LLP 303 BANYAN BLVD., STE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-4349 + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY C/O FDC, MIAMI FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER, 33 NE 4TH STREET, MIAMI, FL 33132 + +GARY ██████████, ESQ , 425 N. ANDREWS AVENUE, SUITE 2, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 +JOHN SCAROLA , ESQ , 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 +PADULA & GRANT, PLLC 365 E. PALMETTO PARK ROAD, BOCA RATON, FL 33432-5015 + +![](_page_5_Picture_30.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60a2e4eb83ea70e320b3a480a3b9380832fe7e1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/EFTA02765196.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7546, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.43, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_5_Picture_26.jpeg", + "_page_5_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nt.ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 312.73199999999997, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR SEPARATE T AQ IN THE ALTERNATIVE \nTO ADJUST THE ORD OOF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 534.6710815429688, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 534.6710815429688, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "( j14/ Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.5399932861328, + 451.1015625 + ], + [ + 333.89508056640625, + 451.1015625 + ], + [ + 333.89508056640625, + 464.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.5399932861328, + 464.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supplement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 105.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 339.5837707519531, + 105.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 339.5837707519531, + 119.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 119.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.952, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 272.952, + 340.2 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765196" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5d5a897e0e69b7513201b6119b874d83ceec9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:02398e563bdaed93e3c85e70ac1362a150d89f0aea9dc1db69acf2d47753ea72 +size 24524 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b010f2b78dddf52c0f71ad0246a4fbb0ae1a9838 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765196/_page_5_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:540046ae1c3ab66c9527e8b79055727c76aebdb79e81a8e5c028a009d233a3c1 +size 10638 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65d9cf038b16071c0414370e66265b9d1db1f68f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OO11v1BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO + +## PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MO OI DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT SCO STEIN + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), p t rida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500, moves for entry of a default against Defen othstein for failure to serve a response to Epstein's Second Amended Complaint t 22, 2011, and states: + +- 1. Epstein filed his plaint on December 7, 2009. +- 2. Defendant Scott ein ("Rothstein") failed to respond to the Complaint and the Clerk issued a Clerk's De January 21, 2009. +- 3. R [em retained counsel, Mark Nurik, who moved to set aside the default, but an Order was n dared on that Motion. `4\ Mr. Nurik has not withdrawn from this case and has been on the service list since early 2010. +- 5. On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed his Second Amended Complaint. Rothstein was served with the Second Amended Complaint through his counsel. + +6. Rothstein failed to respond to the Second Amended Complaint as required by law and Epstein seeks a judicial default against him. + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter a default against Rothstein in Epstein's favor on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint dated August 22, 2011. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorne Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pu of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). ed on the o F1c 'chi Rule + +> LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes ul ard, Suite 301 West Palm Beac i da 401 (561) 727-3600. 27-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/Sco + +Sc9ttJ. Lin BN 602991) raid Rockenbach (FBN 44903) M. Many (FBN 26680) ry: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com mary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: AngelaelinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack S Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsx@-searcylaw.com scarolateam®searcylaw.com Co-Counselor De J. + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounserSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49e9171dc58228497cf19fcdff448a9f5fb3e19b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202/EFTA02765202.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765202.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4584, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MO OI DEFAULT \nAGAINST DEFENDANT SCO STEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3433532714844, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3433532714844, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765202" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6c38d77cd2c287a99131756407c863540f571ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.md @@ -0,0 +1,457 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUTf IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### IN, PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO REMOVE CASE FROM TRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDA SET FORTH IN RULE 1.440 + +,r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E stein"), moves to remove case from trial docket in order to comply with the man ....et m Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440, and states: '. + +On this past Fri Marc c, 2018, pointed out that the Action was not at issue when he filed his otion Set the Case for Trial. Although Epstein understands the Court's disappointm aJlfg to move the trial to April, it is certainly more efficient and less wasteful of judicial s to have discovered this now than to have done so after two weeks of trial and an appeal, d then to have to conduct a second trial. + +On May 24, 2017, noticed this entire matter for trial. In his Motion to Set Case for Thal, requested this Court "to set the above-styled cause for trial by jury," and expressly stated: "MA long delayed matter is now ripe for resolution."See Exhibit A. Apparently, + +realized on almost the eve of trial, on March 2, 2018 at 5:12:19 p.m., that his claim of "ripeness" was legally flawed. Just as the weekend started, claimed for the very first time in a "Supplement" to his Motion for Separate Trials (in support of request for that Epstein's case against Rothstein may not proceed based on Rule 1.440. See Exhibit B. Regrettably, Epstein must agree that despite MI request to set the cause f r trial, the "Action" is not "at issue." Not realizing this until receipt of Supplement after 5:00 p.m. on Friday, Epstein's counsel researched the issue raised by Edward law is clear: Trial courts arc mandated to follow "strict compliance" with Rule 1 rmining when an Action is "at issue." If in the Action there is a main claim or c rcliilt5as to which there is no answer or default, then the entire Action (excluding only cr aims) is not at issue and it is reversible error to try the Action. + +In other words, when hastily ethis "Case" and "above-styled cause of action" for trial on May 24, 2017, foil ' g re d from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, request was defective b t Action" was not "at issue" for trial setting pursuant to Florida's appellate courts' lion of Rule 1.440. is now correct (albeit at the eleventh hour) — Epstein ended his complaint twice after the default and there was sI default addressin e S nd Amended Complaint. Therefore, this Court's Order on Motion to Se e' for trial was a nullity. Epstein agrees with - it would be reversible error , and this Action would have to be tried twice if this Action proceeded to trial on March 13, 2018. + +Contrary to suggestion, bifurcation or is not a viable remedy to cure the defective trial request and order setting trial. In addition to his separate response squarely addressing the reasons why is not an option, Epstein preserves his adamant objection to + +here and raises the additional point that the only cure for a 1.440-defective notice or motion to set trial and resulting order setting trial is a reset, not a . Moreover, bifurcation is inappropriate here, where the issues are so inextricably intertwined that it would cause the Court to try the case twice with the same underlying issues, exhibits and witnesses, including all three of the current named parties, whether their testimony would be live or from prior deposit ons. + +Accordingly, Epstein moves this Court for an order removing the case fro 'al docket commencing March 13, 2018. This will avoid having to retry this case an • w Epstein to expeditiously obtain a judicial default against Rothstein and the Ac • n c properly noticed and set for trial.' + +# UNDISPUTED Xt i + +RECORD( After having been informed of the issue u ' r gree t?' of March 2 Supplement, Epstein has researched the same and now d c iSru Ir v with belated recitation of the state of the pleadings. (Exhibit B) e d It entered against Rothstein was entered on Epstein's original complaint — ad Ly c taining counts that no longer exist. (Exhibit B, ¶2). Since the default, Epstein ce with the final amendment producing his Second Amended Complaint ag thstein. (Exhibit B, ¶¶3, 6). Epstein agrees that the Second Amended Compl allegi g conspiracy to commit abuse of process, in the operative complaint in this Actio i ib t B, ¶8). There is no default and there is no answer to Epstein's Second Amen aint. + +Epstein also agrees that it was who prematurely and defectively moved to set this "Case" for trial following the remand from the appellate courts. (Exhibit B). Finally, Epstein + +&#x27; Simultaneously filed with this Motion, Epstein also files his motion for default against Rothstein under the Second Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Rule 1.440, the "Action" will be at issue 20 days after this Court grants Epstein's Motion for Default. Thereafter, any party can notice the case for trial and trial shall be set no less than 30 days from service of the notice for trial. + +further agrees with that it would be "reversible error" to permit this Action be tried on March 13, 2018, because Epstein's damages against Rothstein are unliquidated. (Exhibit B, ¶10). has raised this issue for the first time on March 2, 2018, by filing his objection to the "at issue" defect, and Epstein does not waive the defect pursuant to Rule 1.440. + +## ARGUMENT + +# I. Reversible Error to Fail to Strictly Comply with Rule 1.440 + +The rule is clear.2 Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440 is I r unique'p many years, the appellate courts of this state have emphasized that the rule's spec ca 1 mandatory and they have admonished trial courts to strictly adhere to them." • , LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125, 129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Failure to strictly f sr) le results in reversible error. Simply, if an "Action" is not "at issue," it may not 8s, t al. Further, the rule only carves out Arc iti crossclaims as not preventing an Action from ?S r t e; logically, there is no similar exception for unripe counterclaims or complaints tth est of whether an "Action" is at issue and for good reason: the "Action" consists b e complaint and the counterclaim. If one or the other is not at issue, the case cannot trial. + +As noted by one a aced on the appellate court decisions, Rule 1.440's "procedure is elegant in its sim talange, "Setting a Case for Trial: Rule 1.440 Means What It Says." The Florida nial, Vol.84 No.3, March 2010. To start, Rule 1.440 provides that a case may be set hen it is "at issue." + +> First, however, "lain answer must be served by or a default entered against all defending parties before the action is at issue." Thus, where a defendant has not yet answered the complaint, and the plaintiff has failed to obtain a default, the action is not yet at issue. + +2 Trentalange, "Setting a Case for Trial: Rule 1.440 Means What It Says." The Florida Bar Journal, Vol.84 No.3, March 2010. + +Reilly v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n, 185 So. 3d 620, 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (emphasis added; internal citations omitted). + +In fact, appellate courts have recognized that Rule 1.442 "is very clear as to when the action is ready for trial, or is `at issue'...[1]eaving little room for improvisation." Bennett v. Cont'l Chemicals, Inc., 492 So. 2d 724, 726 (Fla. I' DCA 1986). In Bennett, there was n issue to be tried at the time the notice of final hearing (trial) was served because Appel!, • crme ad "not yet filed his answer and appellee had failed to challenge that delinquent g for a default under rule 1.500(b) and (c)." Id. As a result, the "case had not been ly set for trial by the court as required by rule 1.440(c)." Id. + +Similar to suggestion inviting reversi e Ac)ie re, the appellee in Bennett asked the Court to "sever" the unripe counterclaim a n claim that had been answered. The appellate court explained: + +> Since rule 1.440(a) ocempts only cross-claims from the determination of when an action is at issue, we disagree with appellee's argum h" ji would have us sever the motions directed to the countercl fraehhff the answer. + +Id. at 727. Therefor c the o for an "Action" that must be "at issue" for a trial setting relates to "the issues rai c5y complaint, answer, and any answer to a counterclaim." See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.440( + +cry stem rebuke, the First District Court of Appeal explained the "fundamental error [that] will have been committed by the moving attorney's failure to review the court file and follow the mandatory dictates of the rule": + +> The procedure for setting actions for trial is simple, but many attorneys are careless about it. They serve a notice for trial prematurely. This requires a motion to strike the notice or an + +informal request to the court to remove the action from the calendar. There is no excuse for failing to follow the rule. Some judges are equally careless about requiring an order setting the action for trial. Apparently they believe the rule is directory, rather than mandatory. Such is not the case. + +Bennett v. Conti Chemicals, Inc., 492 So. 2d 724, 727-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)[underlined emphasis added]. + +In addressing the mandatory dictates set out in Bennett and others, the Fo \*ct Court of Appeal explained, "We do not quarrel with those cases or their holdin ever, we point out that none of them involved cases that had been pending and at ears before a last minute technical amendment to a complaint." Labor Ready Aoc, c. Australian Warehouses Condo. Assn, 962 So. 2d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 200 4. e pstein has not made any last minute technical amendment. As corre SO out, Epstein's Second Amended Complaint was filed August 21, 2011. See Ex Rather, it is who, correctly but last minute, creates this issue by pointin the al nullity of his premature motion to set cause for trial and the defective order he e issued. + +Like the First District, District Court of Appeal has repeatedly held that it is reversible error to try a re it is "at issue." "Failure to adhere strictly to the mandates of Rule 1.440 is rev r." Tucker v. Bank of New York Mellon, 175 So. 3d 305, 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014 gment reversed because case noticed for trial before answer to counterclaim was fi ision Constructors, Inc. v. Valtec Const. Corp., 825 So.2d 1062, 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(judgment vacated because Failure to adhere strictly to the mandates of Rule 1.440 is reversible error); Ocean Bank v. -Villalta, 141 So. 3d 256, 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014Xcase was not properly "at issue" because M—Villalta had not filed a responsive pleading, no default + +had been issued against =—Villalta, and the trial court had not ruled on Ocean Bank's motion for default against Chase Bank). + +# H. Edward Raised and Created this Reversible Error Issue and Epstein Will Not Waive It + +Epstein is left with no option but to seek relief and strict compliance with Rule 1.440 in order to avoid two trials, Epstein did not initially raise this Rule 1.440 defect jssue, only recognizing it after correctly pointed out the trial order's nullity when sought for the first time nearly on the eve of trial — 6 business days trial setting. Additionally, Epstein did not control a choice to plead his inalitto secution claim as a counterclaim, thereby necessitating the "combined" suits as "A ." Typically, litigants wait for the conclusion (here Epstein's voluntary dismi in malicious prosecution. However, simpt, o file a new lawsuit sounding t wait! was hoping to be sued by Epstein - as evidenced in his email co i ons wanting to "bait" Epstein to sue and potentially waive his Fifth Atnendm dw ' eagerness in being sued so he could be a counter-plaintiff and countersue f \*c. prosecution is further self-evident by the timing of his malicious prosecution cou filed only 17 days after Epstein filed his original lawsuit in December 2009. + +Simply, ds m de a strategic decision to be a counter-plaintiff. could have waited until 's suit was completely over and filed a separate case in which would have laintiff and not have this issue of the "Action" being "at issue." Having made that choice in 2009, has no grounds to be heard in 2018 to reverse it. + +## III. Appellate Courts are Clear: Strict Compliance with Rule 1.440 is Mandatory and So Lignificant ifNot Followed By the Trial Cowl that an Appellate Writ of Mandamus Issues + +The Fourth District has spoken on the "mandatory" nature of the timing of Rule 1.440 and reversal if not followed. See Genuine Parts Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA + +2006Xissuing a writ of mandamus is appropriate when the mandatory timing provisions of Rule 1.440 are not complied with). Unlike an order denying a continuance request that does not rise to the level required for certiorari, the Fourth District recognizes that compliance with the mandatory nature of Rule 1.440 is so fundamental that it warrants mandamus. Id. at 421. + +Consistent with the Fourth District's recognition of the significance of strict ompliance with Rule 1.440, the Second District Court of Appeal also has applied a writ of us to a trial court order setting trial without complying with Rule 1.440. See edia, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). In Gawker, two nonfi t: 5and appeals were consolidated — one granting and the other denying a ' n t35frike a premature notice for trial. Id. at 128 ("[w]e consolidated the petitions a(, ,n 7, 2015, we quashed both orders.")3 Following an extensive analysis of the "Sf merit of mandamus and concluding it 1\ co appropriate when the objection to a prema 1. 0 tice is made before the trial occurs, the Second District ordered that the circuit jc e, + +> ...shall straightaw kilt action for trial docket. This di in force notwiths its June 19. 2015, order setting this the action from the July 6, 2015, trial effective immediately, and it shall remain hg the filing of a motion for rehearing, if any. + +Id. at 133 [emphasis dd + +Factua r involved an Action that, like this one, was not at issue. Bollea dismissed one defen ire, but amended to seek punitive damages against the remaining defendant. Determm o maintain the trial date, Bolles also filed a "notice that action is still at issue" and asked the court to reset the case for trial. Id. at 127. The next day, the trial court entered an order + +3 There was already a petition for writ of certiorari pending in this matter arising out of an order severing one of the Gawker defendants known as Blogwire, who was up on appeal addressing Florida's long-arm statute. Id. at 127. + +stating that no further pleading in response to the punitive damages amendment was required and Gawker was deemed to have denied it. Id. Meanwhile, Gawker filed an objection, pointing out that under Rule 1.440, the case was not at issue until twenty days had elapsed after the pleadings are closed. Id. The trial court was unpersuaded and errantly believed she could disregard Gawker's objection as "innocuous technicalities." Id. Three days later Gawker appealed to he Second District. y + +4 Finding no waiver and reiterating the longstanding tenet in Flori 9 t 0 e 1.440 must be strictly adhered to, the Second District granted the writ of man t to enforce the movant's unqualified obligation to perform a clear legal duty./ AV 13 I + +# NL IN + +In light of the law interpreting Rule 1.44 S ry nature and strict compliance requirement, this Action was not at issue whe moved to set the "Case" for trial on May ed Complaint had no answer and no default. Therefore, the action was not at i ' filed his Motion to Set Case for Trial prematurely prompting this Co trial date of March 13, 2018 (reset from December 2017). he 24, 2017, because the superseding Sec e T + +This defect can an cured with a default entered by this Court on Thursday, March 8, 2018, at the t hearing. The entire matter—originating claim and inextricably interwoven aim—may then proceed as it should. Pursuant to Rule 1.440, either party must ut 20 days from March 8, 2018, for when the notice setting trial can be signed (March 28, 2018), and then this Court must wait a minimum of 30 days for setting a trial date. If each of these tasks occurs on the first date of ripeness, the earliest this Action can proceed to trial is 50 days from Thursday, or on April 29, 2018). + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully moves to remove this case from the March 13, 2018, trial docket so that the parties can comply with Rule 1.440 and reset the trial for the most immediate rule-compliant date. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys AilinIi ted , on the Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to orida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, P 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Bo Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Flori (561) 727-3600; (561) [fax] + ++6s + +By: Is/Scott J. Scott J. 602991) Kara R enbach (FBN 44903) An rass y (FBN 26680) : cottQlinkrocklaw.com ICaraelinlcrocklaw.com : Angela©linkrocklaw.com " Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FlF I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OCONBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, • + +Defendant(s). + +## MOTION TO SET CASE FORtRIAL + +J. Eln, by and through his unde gn counsel, moves this Honorable Court to set the above-styled cause for trial by jury. elayed matter is now ripe for resolution and is expected to take approximately 10 + +See the attached response by pstein reflecting that appellate issues with respect to this matter have been resolved (ta, + +( '• e) I HEREBY CERTIFY thata true and correct c to all Counsel on tho atta-Nd' ist, this e2VP foregoing was sent via E-Serve + +> Jack S Florid 6r No.: 169440 Atto y E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and m carcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_searolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +COUNSEL LIST + +William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire +wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com +250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-655-4777 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Bistos & +Lehrman, P.L. +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Fred Haddad, Esquire. + +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; +Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com +Fred Haddad, P.A. +One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 +Phone: (954)-467-6767 +Fax: (954)-467-3599 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Tonja Haddad, Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddad.com; +efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +# IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO. SC15-2286 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. + +Petitioner, + +J. a et al., + +Respondents. + +# PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO O14 SHOW CAUSE + +The petitioner responds as follows Nt , Y's order dated May 3, 2017: + +` 1. On May 3, 2017, this Court atc l a1S order directing the petitioner to show cause on or before May 18, 2 'this Court's decision in Debrincat v. Fischer, 42 Fla. L Weekly S141 1279, 2017), is not controlling in this case and why the Court should not decline to exercise jurisdiction in this case. + +onse tiithe show cause order, the petitioner would show no cause why Debringat is >iot controlling as to the basis for this Court's jurisdiction, and no cause why tt s-Court should not decline to exercise jurisdiction. + +Respectfully submitted, + +LAW OFFICES OF PAUL MORRIS, P.A. 9350 S. Dixie Highway Suite 1450 Miami, FL 33156 + +Florida Bar No. 193769 Tel. (305) 670-1441 Fax (305) 670-2202 paulappeal@gmail.com paul®paulmorrislaw.com + +sl Paul Morris PAUL MORRIS Counsel for Petitioner + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ira, + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that this response was emailed G•dunsel on the list below this 18th day of May, 2017. + +> s/ Paul orris PAUL MORRINe + +# SERVICE LIST: + +Philip M. Burlington Burlington & Rockenbach,, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Sde.?2,510 444 West Railroad Ave. West Palm Beach, F 3401 + +TH STREET, MIAMI, FL 33132 + +GARY ██████████, ESQ , 425 N. ANDREWS AVENUE, SUITE 2, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 +JOHN SCAROLA , ESQ , 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 +PADULA & GRANT, PLLC 365 E. PALMETTO PARK ROAD, BOCA RATON, FL 33432-5015 + +![](_page_21_Picture_30.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..159f8f069d76e8484c888f64233247f61304e34a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/EFTA02765205.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1374 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 22, + "chars": 28863, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.76, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_21_Picture_26.jpeg", + "_page_21_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN, \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO REMOVE CASE FROM TRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER \nTO COMPLY WITH THE MANDA SET FORTH IN RULE 1.440", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 301.4815368652344 + ], + [ + 487.0881042480469, + 301.4815368652344 + ], + [ + 487.0881042480469, + 355.863037109375 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 355.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 463.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNDISPUTED Xt i", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 406.36800000000005, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 344.6411437988281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 344.6411437988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Reversible Error to Fail to Strictly Comply with Rule 1.440", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 396.35491943359375, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 396.35491943359375, + 224.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 224.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Edward Raised and Created this Reversible Error Issue and Epstein Will Not Waive It", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 528.43701171875, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 528.43701171875, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. Appellate Courts are Clear: Strict Compliance with Rule 1.440 is Mandatory and So \nLignificant ifNot Followed By the Trial Cowl that an Appellate Writ of Mandamus Issues", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 543.4392700195312, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 543.4392700195312, + 651.8035125732422 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 651.8035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NL IN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 348.5087585449219, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 348.5087585449219, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFlF I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.06, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 525.3056030273438, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 525.3056030273438, + 126.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 309.06, + 126.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO SET CASE FORtRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.124, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 400.43670654296875, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 400.43670654296875, + 335.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 335.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 424.59417724609375, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 424.59417724609375, + 119.86199951171875 + ], + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 119.86199951171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO O14 SHOW CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 481.9941101074219, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 481.9941101074219, + 350.4919738769531 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 350.4919738769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ira,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 430.0389099121094, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 430.0389099121094, + 269.85198974609375 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 269.85198974609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.20999908447266, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 175.6991729736328, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 175.6991729736328, + 423.2219543457031 + ], + [ + 84.20999908447266, + 423.2219543457031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 539.6583862304688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 539.6583862304688, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR SEPARATE S R, IN THE ALTERNATIVE \nTO ADJUST THE ORPE F ROOF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 538.4707641601562, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 538.4707641601562, + 362.60302734375 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 362.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 334.7514953613281, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 334.7514953613281, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Supplement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 105.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 339.5837707519531, + 105.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 339.5837707519531, + 119.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 119.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFAULT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 340.2 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765205" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5d5a897e0e69b7513201b6119b874d83ceec9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:02398e563bdaed93e3c85e70ac1362a150d89f0aea9dc1db69acf2d47753ea72 +size 24524 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b010f2b78dddf52c0f71ad0246a4fbb0ae1a9838 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765205/_page_21_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:540046ae1c3ab66c9527e8b79055727c76aebdb79e81a8e5c028a009d233a3c1 +size 10638 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b59115d5dee1d6ce721022908d8786173ef98147 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIvD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-P MOTION TO Ac ) EPSTEIN'S + +( at + +'..) + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffre ps Mi, ("Epstein"), responds in opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff; ) Motion to Compel Epstein to respond to IM' February 6, est for Admissions, and states: + +#### INTRODUCTION + +Without argum lanation, seeks an order compelling Epstein to respond to the Requests ions ("RFAs") propounded on February 6, 2018, claiming Request #1 is "impe ibly vasive" and Request #2 objection based on privilege has been "waived." n should be denied simply because it is devoid of any argument or authorities to support his position. In the alternative, should not be allowed to present any authorities or support for his Motion at the hearing of this matter without giving Epstein an appropriate amount of time to serve a written response. + +Nevertheless, Epstein did respond as set forth below: + +I. The printout of your New York State Sex Offender registration page attached [to the Request] as Exhibit 'A' is authentic. + +# RESPONSE + +Epstein cannot admit or deny this request because he has no control ove r personal knowledge about the authenticity of the registration attached as Exhibit Request. + +2. The information contained in the printout of your New York ffender registration page attached [to the Request] as Exhibit 'A' is a + +# RESPONSE + +Epstein cannot admit or deny this request bee response would require the disclosure of information which could commu a s ement of fact that is testimonial in nature. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S 1 (1976). There is a substantial and reasonable basis for concern that such is statements of fact could reasonably furnish a "link in the chain of evide uld be used to prosecute him in future criminal proceedings. See Hoffm led States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). Additionally, Epstein cannot res to s request without waiving his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Ri teed by the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 2, 9 and 1 ql tll lorida Constitution. + +offers no r rd 1 goal support for his blanket assertions of "waiver" and "vague." Rather, Edwar a ti a fpst Motion is meritless and an obvious attempt to circumvent the hearsay rule. (S , + +# ARGUMENT + +The Re rY to RFA #1 is not "Impermissibly Vague" Because Epstein Cannot Authenticate Printouts from a New York State Government Website. + +Epstein's response to Request #1 is not "impermissibly vague," but is the only proper response under Florida law. Indeed, Florida law is clear that "[d]ocumentary and electronic evidence must be authenticated before it is admissible, and "Mlle party offering electronic evidence must introduce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the evidence is what its proponent claims." § 901.1a Electronic evidence, 1 Fla. Prac., Evidence § 901.1a (2017 ed.) (emphasis added; citations omitted). as the proponent of the evidence, bears this burden. + +"Wcb-sites," however, "are not self-authenticating. To authenticate printouts from a website, the party proffering the evidence must produce some statement or affidavit from someone sift knowledge of the website . . . for example a web personal knowledge would be sufficient." Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 897, 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (citing St. Luke's Cataract & Laser I WL 1320242 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2006) (emphasis added)) appellate court held that information and printouts f / 0mment website concerning or son1 4else with h, 95 So. 3d Sanderson, 2006 agh, for example, the expected military retirement benefits were not adm " q i use the website printouts were not authenticated. Id. at 899-900. + +Other cases similarly hold that predicate testimony to establish th 3d 262, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2 website that had not been rti ticated. "Any argument that a copy of an online document, even a document frome (ebsi S \ printout is not admissible in the absence of )teLaw, ty of the printout. See, e.g., Dolan v. State, 187 So. r to admit booking photograph printed from sheriff's an essential th over went website, can be admitted into evidence over objection to prove . . . without any predicate testimony to establish its authenticity or to prove content, . . . borders on the frivolous.") (emphasis added); Lodge v. Kondaur Capital Corp., 750 F.3d 1263, 1274 (11th Cir. 2014) (document purportedly from the "Georgia Press Association Public Notice Website" that listed foreclosure advertisements for properties was inadmissible because it was not authenticated); Sun Protection Factory, Inc. v. Tender Corp., 2005 WL 2484710 (M.D. Fla. 2005) ("[W]ebsites are not self-authenticating."). + +Epstein is not "someone with knowledge" of the New York State Sex Offender registration website. As such, he cannot admit—nor can he be compelled to admit—that the website printout is authentic. + +### Epstein Cannot Be Forced to Incriminate Himself, and His Privilege Objection to RFA #2 was not Waived + +Epstein appropriately asserted his constitutional privileges against self-i rimination when asked to admit to the accuracy of the information contained in the pr t o the New York State Sex Offender registration page. Simply, he cannot be com 6 we a different response. + +The United States Constitution guarantees that a pe not be compelled to testify or give evidence against himself. See U.S. CONST. aNen , aness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449, 461 (1975). The Fifth Amendment may be tend to subject to criminal responsibility hi o gt es it." McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924). Thus, the privilege may d to avoid civil discovery if the person invoking it reasonably fears the answer wo C e incriminate him. See id.; U.S. v. Certain Real Prop. & Premises Known as 4003-4005 ve., Brooklyn, N.Y., 55 F.3d 78, 82 (2d Cir. 1995) (internal citations omitted) (" I tigant may legitimately use the Fifth Amendment to avoid having c it cases "wherever the answer might to answer in ng any phase of the discovery process. "[C]ourts have repeatedly held that the 0 against self-incrimination justifie[s] a person in refusing to answer questions a deposition, or to respond to interrogatories, or requests for admissions, or to produce documents.") (emphasis added). + +"The protection does not merely encompass evidence which may lead to criminal conviction, but includes information which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could lead to prosecution, as well as evidence which an individual reasonably believes could be used against him in a criminal prosecution." Maness, 419 U.S. at 461 (citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951)). + +fails to specify how, when, or where this purported waiver occurred. And this Court should be hesitant to find one. "Because the right to be free from self-incrimination is a fundamental principle secured by the Fifth Amendment, waiver of the privilege '11 not be lightly inferred, and courts will generally indulge every reasonable presumption finding a waiver." Jenkins v. Wessel, 780 So. 2d 1006, 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (ciMijp itted). + +# CONCLUSION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respec is that this Honorable Court enter an Order denying Defendant/Counter-Plainti wards' Motion to Compel. + +I certify that the foregoing documen Service List below on March 3, 2018, thmu of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). furnished to the attorneys listed on the 's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +INK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of [REDACTED] rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59d1ff4cb2184986df6238c292b259a5f6dd1300 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227/EFTA02765227.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,436 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765227.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 11459, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-P \nMOTION TO \nAc ) EPSTEIN'S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 513.4680000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 355.79296875, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 355.79296875, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 174.34896850585938, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 174.34896850585938, + 182.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 182.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 174.32266235351562, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 174.32266235351562, + 307.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 307.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Cannot Be Forced to Incriminate Himself, and His Privilege Objection to RFA #2 was \nnot Waived", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 183.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 183.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 279.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 279.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765227" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7e0141ac871406a0d8617449708f898915c298b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.md @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +10 SEP 17 PM 3:39 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR +ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +COMES NOW, the Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this, his Request for Admissions to the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant admit or deny the following facts, in accordance with Rule 1.370, Fla.R.Civ.P.: + +ADMISSIONS + +1. 1. You have acted on a sexual preference for minor females\* on multiple occasions over the course of at least the last decade. +2. 2. You have engaged in sexual activity\*\* with more than forty minor girls between 2002 and 2006 in your residence in West Palm Beach, Florida. + +\* "minor females" is defined as females who were known by you at the time or who are now known to you to have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them, and females who you now have reason to believe may have been under 18 years of age at the time of your interaction with them. + +\*\* "sexual activity" for purposes of these interrogatories means any physical contact with the genitals or exposed breasts of another person. + +3. Among the minor females with whom you have engaged in sexual activity between 2002 and 2006 was a person identified in a civil suit filed against you as: + +- a. Jane Doe + +- b. E.W. + +- c. L.M. \_..\, + +4. You paid to engage in sexual activity with minor &mai tltwah2002 and 2006, including the following persons identified in legal pleadings as: C.W. A.H., S.G., A.D., V.A., N.R., J.S., V.Z., J.A., F.E., M.L., M.D., D.D., D.N. + +- a. Jane Doe + +A l (...., S + +- b. E.W. + +- c. L.M. e + +N.-- + +5. When you enga xual activity with minor females between 2002 and 2006, t you knew or had substantI l,.son to believe at the time that they were under the age of 18. + +6. A doc ent maintained by your employee, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, contains the names of dozens of minor girls with whom you had sexual relations and sexual interaction in West Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, California, Michigan, the Virgin Islands and/or Paris, France including: + +- a. Jane Doe + +adv. Epstein Request for Admissions to Epstein + +- b. E.W. + +- c. L.M. + +- 7. You socialized with minor females in the presence of Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield, and Bill + +- 8. You have transported on your airplanes minor females with whom you have engaged in sexual activity. + +- 9. You engaged in the act of trafficking minors across staldountry borders for the purpose of sex or prostitution between 1997 and the pc i) + +- 10. You filed an intentionally frivolous lassisu \ M; nst for the purpose of deterring his prosecution of claims 240 + - J. + +- 11. The purpose of you filing the lawsuit against J. or L.M. was to induce the settlement of pending eivillavvpits against you. + +- 12. You made allegations in your Complaint against J. knowing at V the time that you h tno good faith basis to believe the allegations were true. + +- 13. 2006, knowing that significant civil lawsuits would be filed against you, you haC Rerred assets with a total value in excess of \$10 million with the intent to defeat the ability of the civil litigants who had filed suits against you to collect on any judgments they might obtain. + +adv. Epstein Request for Admissions to Epstein + +14. You are currently in the process of transferring assets with the intent to defeat the ability of J. M, Esq. to collect any judgment he might obtain on his counterclaim against you in this lawsuit. + +15. You have retitled and continue to retitle assets that you own directly or indirectly (including vehicles, vessels, and airplanes) in the name of other individuals to conceal hose assets from potential judgment creditors. + +16. When civil lawsuits were filed against you by Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W., you knew that the lawsuits would likely result in substantial judgments against you if they proceeded to trial. + +17. When you filed your suit against B icy J. dwards in this case, you knew that you had engaged in sexual activity with the minor females he was representing and that it was likely you would be found civilly liable to them for substantial compensatory and punitive damages if their claims proceeded to trial + +18. On or before July 1, 2010, you arranged for a private investigator to conduct surveillance on Jane Doe. + +19. II The private investigator hired by you to conduct surveillance on Jane Doe tailed her, park—ed his-car in close proximity to her home, and shined headlights into her home at night. + +20. When you filed this lawsuit against J. you knew that it had no basis in fact. + +adv. Epstein Request for Admissions to Epstein + +21. When you filed this lawsuit against J. M, you knew that there was no evidence that he was involved in any false statements that may have been made by Scott Rothstein concerning lawsuits against you. + +22. J. never made any false statements of fact to you. + +23. All attorneys' fees and costs incurred by you to defend against lawsuitsfiled against you by L.M., E.W., Jane Doe, and other minor females with whom you engaged in sexual activity were incurred because you chose to defend against claimi which ''you knew to be meritorious. + +24. Lacking any substantive defense to the t claims filed against you by Jane Doe, E.W., L.M., and other minor females, y \ g o avoid your compensatory and punitive liability by employing your financi to intimidate your victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or r ose claims for substantially less than their just value. + +25. You have no personal and direct knowledge that J. engaged in any unethical, illegal or improper conduct. + +26. You filed your complaint in this case alleging that J. was a Icnowintpartteipant in a civil theft and criminal enterprise when you were well aware that there was no admissible evidence to support such false assertions. + +27. Your goals in filing this lawsuit included harassing J. causing injury to his reputation, interfering with his professional relationships, and causing him to divert time and attention away from effectively representing L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe in their lawsuits against you. + +28. Unless substantial punitive damages are awarded against you, you will continue to file meritless lawsuits like the one you filed against J. and L.M. to deter other minor females with whom you have engaged in sexual activity from collecting damages from you. + +29. Because of your vast wealth, unless a jury awards more than \$10 million in punitive damages against you, it will have no affect on your behavior. + +# INTERROGATO + +30. If your response to any of the Re or dmissions previously submitted was other than an unqualified admission, state fo ch request for admission the following: + +- a. All facts (not opinior'thatj u contend support in any manner your refusal to admit or your qualified admission. +- b. Identify all documents, notes, reports, memoranda, electronic and/or tape recordings, photographs, oral statements, or any other tangible or intangible thing that supports in any manner your refusal to admit or your qualification of your admission. Identification is to be sufficient to identify the aforesaid things in a es gr production. + c. a name and address of a custodian of all tangible or intangible things identified i response to (b) above. +- d. The name and address of all persons, including consultants, purporting to have any knowledge or factual data upon which you base your refusal to admit or the qualification of your admission. + +The purpose of the interrogatory is to have you reveal everything presently known by you that bears on your refusal to admit or your qualification of your admission. The propounding parties at the time of trial will move the court for an order excluding from evidence all tangible or intangible things known to you at the time of your response to these requests for admissions and interrogatories not disclosed in your responses thereto. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Request for Admissions to Epstein + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished by Fax and U.S. + +Mail to all counsel on the attached list on this 16th day of September, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No. 169440 +Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..626c660b929164edb44c875b1dc5a238c9801119 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233/EFTA02765233.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765233.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 9800, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.002, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 502.98, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 502.98, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 283.002, + 119.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.294, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 514.4939999999999, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 514.4939999999999, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 90.294, + 400.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.39799999999997, + 505.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 338.754, + 505.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 338.754, + 519.21 + ], + [ + 262.39799999999997, + 519.21 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.86999999999998, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 356.30899999999997, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 356.30899999999997, + 344.22802734375 + ], + [ + 248.86999999999998, + 344.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.54999999999995, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 349.056, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 349.056, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 257.54999999999995, + 133.65 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765233" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3bf0f06cd6064ec2b6d81d58bd0d1b5d7dc18ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.md @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +04 + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF la MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ADJUST THE ORDER OF PROOF + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), responds in opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards' a") Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof, and states: + +#### INTRODUCTION + +Just 24 ho after tiling his Motion for Separate Trials/Alternative Motion to Adjust the Order of P w filed a "Supplement" to that motion, arguing for the first time that Epstein's ainst Rothstein may not proceed because it is not at issue. Specifically, ked this Court to sever Epstein's claim against Rothstein from counterclaim, because the only pending claim against Rothstein is a Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process count contained in the Second Amended Complaint, to which no default has been entered and which has not been set for trial. (See Supplement to Motion for + +Separate Trials at p. 1). Yet himself set the entire matter for trial. At the time moved to set the case for trial, had been a counter-plaintiff for 8 years! operative pleading was his Answer and Counterclaim filed December 12, 2009. was a counter-plaintiff for nearly 3,000 calendar days, clearly the majority of this Action. + +The (i.e., bifurcation) issue, however, is unrelated to the question of whether the court case is "at issue." Epstein addresses the latter issue in his Motion tAllNlove Case From Trial Docket and Comply With Mandate Set Forth in Rule O , 'eh is filed contemporaneously with this response. This response addresses the issue only. + +Bifurcation is not appropriate in this case and should be C )• several reasons. + +First and foremost, it would be a complete wrist' • al resources. The claim and counterclaim are intertwined; severing them woul S rt hat should be one trial into two, A c i with duplicative evidence and testimony fro s o , he same witnesses. And Epstein's casein-chief against Rothstein will not requ' uc ial time-two days tops, of the ten days that c r have been allotted for trial. + +Second, has v ifurcation. The Joint Pretrial Stipulation—in which the parties contemplate a co ted trial—controls and is binding on the parties and the Court. The fact that in a case tha is not requlsts bifurcation at the Eleventh Hour, less than two weeks before trial, pending for over eight years, suggests the risk of prejudice and confusion troublesome as he now suggests. And while the case undoubtedly presents complex issues, a complex case does not require bifurcation. + +Third, will not be prejudiced by a consolidated trial on both claims—as contemplated by the parties in their pretrial stipulation. Epstein will agree to a statement read by the Court that need not ask a single question of the witnesses called in Epstein's case against Rothstein, because Epstein dismissed from that original civil proceeding. The Court also may instruct the jury that the presentation of damages evidence in Epstein's case against Rothstein in no way suggests or implies that is liable for the damages Epstein claims. + +alternative motion, to adjust the order of proof, should be denied, too. Epstein filed the original civil proceeding, and his claim, naturally and chronologically roceed first. Moreover, Epstein's claim against Rothstein provides the nec kground for counterclaim against Epstein—the latter, counterclaim s the originating claim. In keeping with judicial economy and, as contempla parties in their pretrial stipulation, the Court should first hear evidence on the o le d1 ii (Epstein v. Rothstein), and leave the admission of evidence and the decision S its, " nterclaim pending until after the determination of the main claim. + +# ARGUMENT + +# Bifurcation Would Result in Needless Lineation und a Waste of Judicial Resources + +Florida Rule of Civil Procat 1.270(b), states: + +(Emphasi + +The court herance of convenience or to avoid prejudice may er arate trial of any claim, crossclaim, counterclaim, or d-p claim or of any separate issue or of any number of Cs ossclaims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues. + +"A rough the matter of separation of the issues to be tried rests in the trial court's discretion, a single trial generally tends to lessen the delay, expense and inconvenience to all concerned, and the courts have emphasized that separate trial should not be ordered unless such disposition is clearly necessary, and then only in the furtherance of justice." Mark Distrib. Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 710 So. 2d 1022, 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (emphasis added; citation and internal quotation marks omitted). For example, "It is improper to sever a counterclaim . . . from the plaintiff's claim, when the facts underlying the claims of the respective parties are inextricably interwoven." Id. See also Yost v. Am. Nat. Bank, 570 So. 2d 350, 352-53 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) ("Where the evidence to be submitted on plaintiffs cause of action is the same as, or is interrelated with, the evidence on the counterclaim, it is ap ropriate to try the claims together."). + +To conduct two trials in this case is not convenient or ncc ISuld it further justice. Instead, it would be a complete waste of judicial resources. s throughout the pretrial stipulation, Epstein's claim against Rothstein and Edw ' co erclaim against Epstein are inextricably interwoven—the facts underlying the are interrelated and involve many of the same witnesses. As such, "bifiircae \ n simplify the trial; instead, it will cause inconvenience and prejudice to [Epste ting [his] case." Fortin v. T & M Lawn Care. Inc., 178 So. 3d 438, 438 (Fla. 4 A 2 ). + +Ordering bifurcation whe a e inextricably woven warrants certiorari relief. See id. at 438-39 (granting c e rf tition and "quash[ing] bifurcation order because the bifurcated claims are inell Jy interwoven."). See also Rooss v. Mayberry, 866 So. 2d 174, 175 (Ha. 5th DC ting certiorari and quashing order to bifurcate: bifurcating liability and damag which were intertwined, would convert what should be one trial into two, with testimony from many of the same witnesses); Maris Distrib. Co. v. Anheuser— Busch, Inc., 710 So. 2d 1022, 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (quashing order severing breach of contract cause of action from other counts which arose in the context of the contract, as facts underlying all counts were interrelated). + +In keeping with judicial economy, Epstein will present his case-in-chief against Rothstein in an expeditious manner. Of the ten days that have been allotted for trial, Epstein needs but two days (max) to present his damages case against Rothstein. + +# Has Waived Bifurcation, and 11w Parties Sdaulated to a Consolidated Trial + +By waiting until the Eleventh Hour to request separate trials, argument. Just a glance at the timeline below demonstrates the be request: has waived his ss of his + +![](_page_4_Diagram_3.jpeg) + +Notably, Mi ' ril to raise the hearings, or in aT S the oz ens of motions filed in the last few months. He could have raised the issue a i. I, ober 3, 2017 hearing, when a brief continuance was granted, at any of the hree bifurcation. issue at any of the recent special set hearings in November and December. But not once did he utter a peep about + +has further waived bifurcation based upon the Joint Pretrial Stipulation,' and his last-minute request for separate trials should be denied. + +A copy of the Joint Pretrial Stipulation, filed December 22, 2017, is attached as Exhibit A. + +"The Pretrial Stipulation is a powerful blueprint that fully enables a well-run and fair trial." Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Broward Marine, Inc., 174 So. 3d 1037, 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). It is "the trump card upon which all parties to any litigation can virtually always rely." Id. at 1038. + +While the decision to bifurcate is within the trial court's discretion,2 "Ipiretrial stipulations prescribing the issues on which a case is to be tried are binding u e parties and the court, and should be strictly enforced." Broche v. Cohn, 987 24, 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (emphasis added; citations omitted). "Further, it encourage and uphold stipulations in order to minimize litigal c n pedite the resolution of disputes." Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omi by of the law to + +Here, and Epstein entered into ' stipulation which sets forth the Stipulated Facts and Statement of Issues of ?F S s rmination at Trial. The first disputed issue to be hied is the "Case Again XLthst .r. ". The second issue to be tried is a' malicious prosecution counterclai bite ies therefore stipulated to a consolidated trial, and has waived bifurcatio + +# Denial of Bifurcation WI o Preiudice + +to trials are necessary, or the jury will be confused by the default liability jud gainst Rothstein, and will have to object to evidence not being offer him and appear to be defending Rothstein. These purported concerns of are impossible to take seriously at this stage of the proceedings. Indeed, the fact that requests bifurcation at the Eleventh Hour, less than two weeks before trial, in a case that has been pending for over eight years, suggests the risk of prejudice and confusion is not nearly as troublesome as he now suggests. + +2 Roseman v. Town Square Ass',,, Inc., 810 So. 2d 516, 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). + +In any event, no prejudice will come to by proceeding with a consolidated trial—as the parties agreed to do in their pretrial stipulation. To quell concerns, Epstein will agree to a statement read by the Court that need not ask a single question of the witnesses called in Epstein's case against Rothstein, because Epstein dismissed from that original proceeding. The Court also may instruct the jury that the presentation of damages evidence in Epstein's case against Rothstein in no way suggests 4 tlyiplies that is liable for the damages Epstein claims. + +### Epstein's Case-in-Chief Must Proceed Before Co t ritriaf for Malicious Prosecution + +Alternatively, requests that the order of "adjusted" so the jury may resolve his counterclaim against Epstein before co a pstein's damages claim against Rothstein. (Mot. at ¶ 8). This request is illogica n essary, and should be denied, too. + +Naturally and chronologically, the t t sh Id hear evidence on the originating claim and leave admission of evidence ision on the counterclaim pending until after resolution the main claim. Mo ct , order of proof is what the parties agreed to in the Joint Pretrial Stipulation—which stip n is "binding upon the parties and the Court and should be strictly enforced." Determinatio 87 So. 2d at 127. In the Stipulation, the Issues of Fact for listed clearly in the following order: + +# I. tase Against Rothstein. + +# 2. stlicious Prosecution Counterclaim. + +(See Ex. A at C. I.). + +Regardless, it would be most efficient for Epstein to present his damages case against Rothstein first, because the Rothstein case provides the necessary background for, and in fact led to, interrelated malicious prosecution counterclaim. This is the only order of proof that + +makes sense and which promotes judicial economy. See § 90.612(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (allowing trial judge to exercise reasonable control over presentation of evidence to avoid needless consumption of time). Epstein's originating claim must proceed first. + +# CONCLUSION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this, Honorable Court enter an Order denying Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Edw otion for Separate Trials, or in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's eofJudicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). o attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINKirs ACH, PA 155 .1% B h Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 I each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +" aar. /s/ Scott I. Link + +S Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.corn + +> Trial Counsellor Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### JOINT PRETRIAL STIPULATION + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Specially Setting Jury Trial Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley\_('') hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Stipulation. + +CO S + +- A. List of All Pending Motions: The trial of this matter is special set to commence on March 13, 2018. The parties anticipate that additional Motions will be filed before that date. Presently, the following Motions/Requests are pending: + - 1. 9/2417, Min four Motions to Compel and the following relate." + - a. O1/27/17, Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to Four c Motions to Compel. 0/5/17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential ettlement Agreement Against and His Counsel and the following related filing: + - a. 11/8/17, M Response in Opposition. + - 3. 10/26/17, Motion for Protective Order. + - 4. 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/15/17, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery; + +- b. 9/25/17, EFS -esMotion to Compel Discovery Responses from and +- c. 9/28/17, Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motio to Compel Discovery Responses. +- 5. 11/8/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Flo 90.202 and 90.203, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection to Request + - b. 11/28/17, Epstein's Notice of Filing Supplement al Notice; and +- y. tatutes Section +- 6. 11/13/17, Motion in Limine Address' ope of Admissible Evidence and the following firelated lings: + - a. 11/17/17, Supplement to imine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; + - b. 11/22/17, Epstein's Oppositio ' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evide + - c. 4 12/11/17, Sec Scope of Admissible E +- 7. 11/17/17, following related +- a. 11/13/17, E ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Notice of Production from Non-Parties and the otice of Production from Non-Parties. +- 8. 11/22/17, stein's equest for Judicial Notice. +- 9. 12/1/ , Ed s' Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission. +12/4/17, Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege. +- 12. 12/4/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. +- 13. 12/8/17, Notice of Filing Preliminary Objections and Counter Designations to Epstein's Deposition Designations. +- 14. 12/15/17, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness +- 10. 1 wards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery nses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II — V only). + +# B. Stipulated Facts: + +- 1. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea for one count Amm\ ny licitation of prostitution, a third-degree felony, and one count of pr person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a second-degree felony. 107.) +- 2. was admitted to The Florida Bar in March 07 ( ' 11/10/17 Depo. 43:10-12.) +- 3. After being admitted to the Florida Bar orked as an Assistant State Atte at the Broward State Afton% for approximately three years. 5/15/13 Depo. 6:11-15; /10/17 Depo. 50:3-5.) +- 4. After leaving the Broward S 's Office, went to work for the law firm of Kubicki Dra he worked for approximately three handling insurance defe al 5/15/13 Depo. 7:3-10; 11/10/17 Depo. 56:10 117\W hik an employee of RRA, represented himself to the public, including Epstein, as a partner of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 189:22-192:9.) +- 5. formed united liability company on April 16, 2007, by the name of "The Law O Brad & Associates, LLC." (Sunbiz.org.) +- 6. rking at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA") in April 2009 Ed s' 3/23/10 Depo. 13:19-22.) +- 7. association with RRA terminated at the end of October or beginning of mber 2009. ( 3/23/10 Depo. 15:5-11.) +- 9. Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 267:12-13.) +- 10. Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license in November 2009 and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 25, 2009. (11/25/09 Opinion, The Florida Bar v. Rothstein, Supreme Court of Florida, Case No. SC09- 2146.) + +- 11. Rothstein was arrested and arraigned in federal court in Broward Co ty, Florida on December 1, 2009. (12/1/09 Information, United States ofAmeri a Rothstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case N 1 (D.E. I).) +- 12. In August and September 2008, while working at The La o Brad & Associates, LLC, filed three separate laws Epstein on behalf of three separate clients: L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. (8 Complaint, Jane Doe + - v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern 'strict of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 (D.E. 1); 9/11/08 Com t, LM. v. Jeffiey Epstein, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Coun e po. 50-2008-CA-028051 (D.E. 4); 9/11/08 Complaint, E.W. v. Jeffrey 5''' Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-C #1: , E. 4).) +- 13. E stein does not admit or deny when he was a sole and Jane Doe). However filed the lawsuits agai +- 14. While an emplo Jane Doe cases +- 15. While an e stmOd A litik'tic) t erointlibee hal . allegations ofhis in the three ollaiewsotsui(tLbromuttwby es not challenge good faith when he pstein. 11/20/17 Depo. 78:3-6; 120:11-18.) Mists the lead attorney on the L.M., E.W. and of RRA, was the sole employee of RRA who made ions on the L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases against Epstein. 1 /20/17 Depo. 85:2-15.) 16.E an employee of RRA, did not represent any individuals other than , E.W. and Jane Doe with regard to claims against Epstein. ( 3/23/10 po. 291:8; 11/10/17 Depo. 77:1-7.) +- 17. On July 24, 2009, while was employed by RRA, a Complaint was filed on behalf of L.M. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (7/24/09 Complaint, L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 (D.E. 1).) +- 18. L.M. already had a state court action pending against Epstein at the time the July 24, 2009, federao Complaint was filed which was based on the same facts and circumstances. 11/10/17 Depo. 316:11-20.) + +- 19. never formally served Epstein with the federal Complaint t was filed on behalf of L.M. against Epstein. al 5/15/13 Depo. 34:10 +- 20. L.M.'s July 24, 2009, federal Complaint against Epstein allege her into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engage intercourse with Epstein and she never touched his geni Complaint 142(j) (D.E. 19).) Epstein forced I or vaginal Answer to +- 21. While was employed by RRA he mad emston to take the deposition of three pilots who had flown, at different lanes used by Epstein, and am deposition of a fourth pilot Answer to Complaint 1 36 e litigation against Epstein. +- 22. On August 24, 2009, L.M. not sitions of Epstein's pilots Paul Visoski, Jr., and David rs. L.M. requested they produce "[a]ll original flight logs from 4 , 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets w piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffre or Ghislaine Maxwell." (8/24/09 Notices of Deposition and Su ces Tecums, L M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm l h nty, Case No. 50-2008-C A-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 114, 11 +- 23. In August pile was employed by RRA, he noticed the deposition of Id p in the Jane Doe litigation. (8/11/09 and 8/24/09, Re-Notices of T Videotaped Depositions, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District +- 24. Cie them District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893.) was employed by RRA, he served Answers to Interro atones on half of L.M. and E.W. indicating that he intended to call Bill who was the governor of New Mexico a, as a trial witness as part of clients' litigation against Epstein. Answer to Complaint 140 (D.E. 19).) +- 25. a three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) never testified that they had sex with a celebrity, dignitary or international figure associated with Epstein. a 11/10/17 Depo. 167:21-168:10.) +- 26. In August 2009, a, on behalf of his client E.W., served a Request for Entry Upon Land seeking to inspect Epstein's entire home and property and to take videos + +and photograph it. (8/10/09, Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 143).) + +1. 27. On August 20, 2009, the Court in the E.W. matter noted that E.W.'s request to inspect Epstein's entire home and property was withdrawn. (8/20/09, Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 151).) +2. 28. In August and September 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's medical records from Stephen Alexander, Bruce W. Markowitz and Charles J. Galecki. The Subpoenas sought, "[t]he complete medical file including MRIs, scans, X-rays and any other diagnostic test result, Intake Form, notes, reports, opinions, correspondence to or from third parties, correspondence to or from Jeffrey Epstein, referrals, medical bills, in short, your complete file." (8/19/09 and 9/11/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 105, 127, 129).) +3. 29. On August 14, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's prescription history from Lewis Pharmacy and Greens Pharmacy. The Subpoenas sought, "[a] complete computer printout of any and all prescriptions for medication, name and type of prescription, and all other documentation or information on or regarding Jeffrey Epstein." (8/14/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 97, 100).) +4. 30. On April 24, 2007, L.M., before she was a client of [REDACTED], provided a statement to the FBI. +5. 31. In September 2009, while [REDACTED] was employed by RRA, his client, L.M., testified at a deposition in her case against Epstein. +6. 32. On June 19, 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his Jane Doe client, filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure + +Potential Judgment. (6/19/09 Motion, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-\$0119 (D.E. 165).) + +- 33. In July Jane Doe). 20101.in settled the claims of three die .W., L.M. and 11/10/17 Depo. 305:2-3.) +- 34. The Ponzi scheme through which Rothstein misrep investors began in 2005 and ended in October 2009. for Forfeiture In Rem 1 13, United States v. R Rothstein, United States District Court, Sout CV-61780 (D.E. 1).) +- 35. On November 20, 2009, certain Rothstein in the Seventeenth Ju Florida. This lawsuit was p (11/20/09 Complaint, Razor Judicial Circuit C 062009CA062943 ms and defrauded Verified Complaint operties Purchased by Scott 'et of Florida, Case No. 09 f Rothstein's Ponzi scheme sued Ire ft Court, in and for Broward County, ublic record as of the date it was filed. ing, LLC, et at v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 17th ward County, Florida, Case No. +- 36. The United S govAfttfient filed an Information against Rothstein on or about December 1, 2 s criminal charge was public record as of the date it was filed. (12/ /09 In ation, United States of America v. Rothstein, United States District Co uthern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331.) +38. ',ember 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (12/21/09 Answer and Counterclaim, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 19).) +- 37. O ember 7 2009, Epstein filed a civil Complaint in this action against and L.M. (12/7/09 Complaint, Jetey Epstein v. Scott tein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 09CA40800XXXM13 (D.E. 5).) +- 39. represented L.M. in this litigation. ( 11/10/17 Depo. 255:5-11.) a +- 40. did not charge L.M. for his representation of her in this litigation. 11/10/17 Depo. 255:12-19; 257:23-258:1.) + +1. 41. [REDACTED] did not enter into any written representation agreement with L.M. concerning his representation of her in this litigation. ([REDACTED] 11/10/17 Depo. 255:20-256:8; 258:2-4.) +2. 42. On January 21, 2010, a Default was entered against Rothstein in this litigation as to all claims in the December 7, 2009, Complaint against Rothstein. (1/21/10 Default, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 27).) +3. 43. In early August 2010, L.M. and Epstein entered into a Stipulation for Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Individually, Only. (8/5/10 Stipulation, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 112).) +4. 44. On August 9, 2010, the Court entered a Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Only approving L.M. and Epstein's Stipulation. (8/9/10 Final Order, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 113).) +5. 45. On January 5, 2011, Epstein moved to amend his Complaint, to eliminate certain paragraphs. (1/5/11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 195).) +6. 46. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothstein and Edwards for abuse of process. (4/12/11 Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 303).) +7. 47. On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint, which was corrected on August 24, 2011, bringing a claim for abuse of process against [REDACTED] and for conspiracy to commit abuse of process against Rothstein. (8/22/11 Second Amended Complaint and 8/24/11 Notice of Scrivener's Error and Corrected Second Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 368, 370).) + +- 48. On November 3, 2011, moved for Final Summary Judgment on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. (11/3/11 Renewed Motion for Find Summary Judgment, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al., 15th Judicial Circ ourt, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 401).) +- 49. appeared in this action as his own co-counsel on the suit against him was dismissed. ( 11/10/1 Notice of Appearance, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothste Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA408 +- 50. On July 26, 2012, the Court set the hearing o Summary Judgment to be held on Augus Motion to Reschedule Hearing, Jeffi• Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach (D.E. 512).) +- 51. Epstein dismissed his claim 2012. (8/16/12 Notice o et al., 15th Judie 502009CA40800 +- 52. inco the present than January 20 2012, before :7-22; 3/27/12 Judicial Circuit B (D.E. 468).) ' Renewed Motion for Final (7/26/12 Order on + - v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15 ase No. 502009CA40800XXXMB our prejudice against on August 16, Dismissal, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. . 519).) lawyer has been collective) greater from January 2010 to as from 2002 when started practicing law through wards' 11/10/17 Depo. 47:10-14; 49:4-13.) +- 53. s is not claiming a loss of income as a result of his reputation being injured ps n's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. 10/10/13 Depo. 1-22.) +wards has not seen a doctor or taken any medication as a result of the anxiety caused by this lawsuit. ( ' 5/15/13 Depo. 57:23-58:5; 11/10/17 Depo. 112:11-20.) + +**C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:** + +1. Case Against Rothstein. What, if any, damages were sustained by Epstein and proximately caused by Rothstein? ([REDACTED] does not agree with this language for the reason that the issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Ponzi scheme. It is [REDACTED] position that failure to limit the issue in this way as to Rothstein has the potential of confusing the jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable cause to claim damages against [REDACTED] arising out of the same circumstances.) + +2. Malicious Prosecution Counterclaim. The following are issues of fact for determination at trial on [REDACTED] Counterclaim against Epstein: + +A. Epstein's Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were not sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against [REDACTED] was supported by existing facts and, thus, Epstein did not have probable cause to institute his civil proceeding. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were insufficient to support a belief on the part of a reasonably cautious person that [REDACTED] had engaged in conduct that supported Epstein's claims against [REDACTED]. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction. The parties agree that, in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether probable cause existed to support the institution of the civil proceeding brought by Epstein against [REDACTED] is an issue of law to be determined by the Court.) + +B. If Epstein had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against [REDACTED] at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding + +against [REDACTED], based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against [REDACTED] was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring [REDACTED] or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +[REDACTED] Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against Edwards resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. ([REDACTED] disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +E. Whether Epstein's civil proceeding against [REDACTED] was terminated in favor of [REDACTED]. ([REDACTED] contends this is a legal issue for determination by the Court.) + +F. Whether the institution or continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] was a substantial contributing cause of damage to [REDACTED] and, but for the malicious institution or continuation of the proceeding, [REDACTED] damage would not have occurred. + +G. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate [REDACTED] for his compensatory damages that resulted from Epstein's institution or continuation of the civil proceeding against [REDACTED]. + +- D. Exhibit Lists (with OW Exhibit Lists and to ide disclosed and/or provid +- H. Whether Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduc reckless disregard or gross negligence which was a substantial cause of d: ages. +- I. Whether punitive damages are warranted as punislune in for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against ds d/or as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding wi ble cause. +- J. Whether the claimed damage is a result of state made after the institution of the civil proceeding and are thu ro ted by the litigation privilege, even if any such statements to untrue. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Ins ut disputes it is appropriate because he believe Amended Complaints are "statements made after the i ut the civil proceeding" and are afforded no protection by th privilege.) +- K. Bifurcated Proceeding: ount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages 7 a punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceed\* againsPEdwards and/or as a deterrent to others. Nile parties do not waive their right to amend their onal objections for those exhibits that have not yet been rrespond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + - I. 't List and Epstein's Objections are attached as Composite Exc. + - 2. ein Exhibit List and Objections are attached as Composite it B. +- E. Lists: The parties do not waive their right to amend their Witness Lists. Witness List is attached as Exhibit C. + - 2. Epstein's Witness List is attached as Exhibit D. +- F. Estimated Trial Time: estimates 10 trial days; Epstein estimates 15-20 trial days. + +## G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case: + +For Jeffrey Epstein: Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 + +For J. Jack Scarola David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev 41. A Telephone: (561) 686-6300 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +### H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three. + +#### 1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities + +- sed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite Exhi it E. +- 2. proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite bi F. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein and* [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Joint Pretrial Stipulation +Page 14 + +DATED: December 22, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +(561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +![]()LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link, with permission +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac7a5ee989327be5bf041bfb26f2737fd38c8531 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/EFTA02765241.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1331 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 24, + "chars": 40845, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.1, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Diagram_3.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF la \nMOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ADJUST THE \nORDER OF PROOF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 531.4243774414062, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 531.4243774414062, + 383.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 383.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 355.7747802734375, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 355.7747802734375, + 491.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 491.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 344.58758544921875, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 344.58758544921875, + 417.363037109375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 417.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Bifurcation Would Result in Needless Lineation und a Waste of Judicial Resources", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 487.1493835449219, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 487.1493835449219, + 444.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 444.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Has Waived Bifurcation, and 11w Parties Sdaulated to a Consolidated Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 493.5809326171875, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 493.5809326171875, + 169.18359375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 169.18359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Denial of Bifurcation WI o Preiudice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 500.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 500.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Case-in-Chief Must Proceed Before Co t ritriaf for Malicious \nProsecution", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 543.9759521484375, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 543.9759521484375, + 293.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 293.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. tase Against Rothstein.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 251.50177001953125, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 251.50177001953125, + 569.3625183105469 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 569.3625183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. stlicious Prosecution Counterclaim.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 319.885498046875, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 319.885498046875, + 597.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 597.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 549.0867919921875, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 549.0867919921875, + 117.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 117.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT PRETRIAL STIPULATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 352.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 352.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Stipulated Facts:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 213.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 213.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 389.84400000000005, + 186.3 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.3 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 187.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 187.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 429.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 429.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to \nsupporting authorities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 471.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 471.06353759765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Diagram", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765241" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/_page_4_Diagram_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/_page_4_Diagram_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea5bdb34d92297d3dd18f1c6380d7109a29068f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765241/_page_4_Diagram_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fec3f31dc03344ea585ef82ec133be16c55268118db2c65669c77a211183a2b7 +size 50310 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..948fc2e7f68dd96b6f189a9788f132573befc319 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.md @@ -0,0 +1,3702 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. I t.ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040801:0OOOMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +#### MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELYS STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY REFERE PRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED TAL EXHIBITS AND TO CUMENTS CONTAINING PRIVILEGE LOG + +A + +ss + +Counter-Plaintiff a, through ers counsel, hereby files this Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental E and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privilege Listed on a Privilege Log, and in support states as follows: + +#### atjanna + +attempt to either conduct trial by ambush or sufficiently muddy the waters er continuance, Epstein has sporadically disclosed new trial exhibits over the direct violation of multiple orders of this Court concerning both the deadline to disclose exhibits and the prohibition against general, catch-all exhibit categories. On February 6, 2018, was required to file his General Objection to Untimely Composite Exhibits, attached hereto as Exhibit 'A,' in order to preserve his objections to this highly prejudicial conduct. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +Finally, on February 28, 2016, undersigned counsel sent the following communication to Epstein's counsel: + +Your recent efforts to add documents not specifically identified to earlier listed categories prompts me to remind you that Judge Hafele has required that documents be identified in a manner that enables the opposing party to kno in advance exactly which documents are intended to be offered in eviden We assume you have complied with that directive and are relying on that cocz ;ae + +On March 2, 2018, only two days later and on the eve of trial, E first time 198 new trial exhibits consisting of at least forty-nine (49) when was at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA") ac, in actively prosecuting losed for the e-mails generated both civil claims against Epstein and the still-pending C nge to Epstein's extraordinary sweetheart plea deal. These e-mails have been list eSo ards' privilege log since February 23, 2011. Epstein filed 2011 privil documents. At this time, it is u although it is clear that he did that he is improperly in p obtained an order either overruling th tt Sip' this Court on April 11, 2012 and has not 'vile e assertions or compelling production of these sly how Epstein obtained these privileged materials, ret and has waited until the last possible moment to reveal n of privileged materials. + +The late ure of these trial exhibits is in direct violation of the Court's July 20, 2017 Order, the ecember 5, 2017 oral ruling (concerning trial exhibits not-yet-produced and prohibits g eral, catch-all exhibits) and the Court's January 16, 2018 ruling. Furthermore, despite the e-mail correspondence being listed on 2011 Privilege Log, it is now clear that Epstein surreptitiously obtained these privileged communications years ago and his counsel failed to comply with their ethical obligations once coming into possession of clearly privileged materials listed on privilege log to immediately relinquish possession of those materials. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +Undersigned counsel (as well as Paul Cassell, Esq., as counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) has since notified Epstein's counsel, Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach, that they are in possession of privileged materials and has requested that counsel take all ethically appropriate steps to turn over this information. That repeated request has been repeatedly denied. + +requests that the Court strike all late disclosed trial exhibits, inc A;t nncifically e but not limited to the privileged materials identified on IM' 201 • Log, which Epstein's counsel has acknowledged have been in the possession of Epc, awycrs for years, since at least 2011. from making any reference to materials that are cl privileged and which have been listed on Edwar to the violation of multiple Court orders an single e-mail has any relevance whatso prior to instituting this malicious amst further requests that the Court s d preclude Epstein's counsel ey-client and work-product log for seven (7) years. In addition teal possession of these materials, not a (1) Epstein did not have possession of them and therefore could not have relied on them to support probable cause, F has never testified that he relied upon them to continue this malicious lawsuit aga wards, and (3) the communications generated in the course of the prosecution of cl rr against Epstein relate to conduct subject to the absolute protection of the litigation + +y, requests that the Court require Epstein's counsel to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for their attempt to conduct trial by ambush by using improperly obtained privileged materials and then unethically refusing to destroy or turn over all copies of the privileged materials once being put on notice of same. Any subsequent sanction should include at a minimum an award of all costs and fees incurred in dealing with these issues. + +## The Court Orders Violated by Epstein + +1. On July 20, 2017, the Court entered its Order Specially Setting Trial, which set the case for trial beginning on December 5, 2017. + +2. In its Order, the Court required that the Pre-Trial Stipulation include " h party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedul to the stipulation." (emphasis added). The Court made clear that the parties wo rictly limited to exhibits . . . disclosed . . . on the schedules attached to the Pr rial ulation . . .absent agreement specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or ofdeR J the Court upon good cause shown." (emphasis added). + +3. Thus, the Court's July 20, 2017 Ord e parties to only those trial exhibits that were specifically identified and disclo n t -Trial Stipulation. + +4. In October and Novem 17 e parties began exchanging Exhibit Lists and producing proposed exhibits in c ith the Court's Order. Epstein's Exhibit List listed as Exhibit #13, "miscellaneous," br dest catch-all provision possible: + +## All docum duced by any party or non-party in this matter. + +5. ecember 5, 2017 hearing, the Court instructed that any identified exhibits not prevto tau ced must be provided to opposing counsel by no later than December 19, 2017. Y 12/5/17 Tr. at 225:21-226:4. The Court also cautioned that general "catch-all" exhibit categories would not be permitted and that, instead, the specific documents covered by + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +such exhibits must be separately identified and produced. Sec. e.g., 12/5/17 Tr. at 223:11- 225:14. + +The message to the parties was clear: trial by ambush would not be permitted.' + +6. On December 19, 2017, Epstein produced copies of certain listed exhibits pursuant to that directive. + +7. Epstein's Exhibit #13 contained twenty-seven (27) RRA ems' f these emails were listed on NM April 12, 2012 Privilege Log. + +8. On December 22, 2017, the parties filed the Pre-Trial ipula i. Epstein's Exhibit List was attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation." + +9. Thus, pursuant to the Court's December 5 g and the December 19, 2017 fc exhibit exchange, Epstein's Exhibit #13 was comp1: ' o 27 emails that had been specifically identified and produced. + +10. Moreover, pursuant to Epstein was "strictly limited" to pecific documents absent a showing of good cause, which would necessarily requ ling of some motion seeking relief from the Court. Court's July 20, 2017 Order Specially Setting Trial, + +11. Epstein, assn consistent over the past few months, chose to ignore these Court Orders an d began piecemeal producing additional proposed exhibits throughout the month of e V , which finally prompted undersigned counsel to send correspondence to Epstein' 1 objecting to these flagrant violations of the Court's rulings. See Ex. 'A'. + +I The Court's oral ruling was memorialized on Jan 16, 2018, when the Court entered its Order on Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section B r Trial Exhibits). This Order required to produce all trial exhibits that had not already been produced by December 20, 2018 and to produce all specific exhibits to a general "catch-all" category by no later than January 5, 2018. Although the Order did not specifically require Epstein to do the same, the reason was straightforward: Epstein claimed that he already produced all specific trial exhibits on December 19, 2017. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +12. Epstein's continued violation of the Court's Orders culminated on March 2, 2018, with the eve-of-trial production of 198 new emails under Exhibit #13, which include at least fortynine (49) privileged emails that are listed on 2012 Privilege Log. This improper, prejudicial, and unethical conduct should not be permitted by the Court. + +# Timeline of the Privileged Materials at Issue 4•Alic + +13. In order to orient the Court regarding IMM . 2011 Privi has compiled the following timeline concerning the privileged c-ma' 'cations at issue. Because the privileged materials at issue are e-mail communic RRA, Epstein originally sought these records in the Bankruptcy Court to be prod Trustee, appointed to oversee the RRA bankruptcy proceeding. has hi the Court's convenience: e key State Court docket entries for + +| April 17, 2010 | Epstein p o | ded (broad subpoena to the Trustee for RRA as an interested | +|--------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | party i e | ptcy case of In re: Rothstein Rosenfcldt Adler, 09-34791- | +| | banttup | tee because the trustee was in possession of all RRA emails). | +| July 19, 2010 | | (one of Epstein's victims) filed an objection and amended motion for | +| | from disclosure based on | privilege and relevance grounds. | +| a 13, 010 | | Judge Rey in the bankruptcy action entered an order regarding production of | +| | the emails to a special M, | Judge Camey, appointed to oversee the emails | +| September 20, 2010 | | After having received 27,590 entails, Special Carney moved for | +| | included | were in a better position to create a privilege log. | + +2 Copy attached hereto as Exhibit'B'. + +Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any + +Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +| Bankruptcy Court | September 27, 2010 | ██████████ moved for protective order through counsel Jack Scarola, adopting LM's arguments for a protective order and invoking work-product privilege. DE 1022. | +|-------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Bankruptcy Court | September 30, 2010 | LM joined in that DE 1022 motion and requested further clarification. DE 1038. | +| Bankruptcy Court | October 13, 2010 | Hearing on Motion to Clarify before Robert Carney. | +| Bankruptcy Court | October 15, 2010 | The bankruptcy court entered an Order which clarified its earlier Order, DE 1068, requiring that the trustee provide the emails at issue to ██████████ Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos Lehrman (██████████'s firm at the time which was representing LM) and requesting FJWEFL prepare the log. The order also provided a procedure for the special master to hold a hearing about assertions of privilege. | +| Bankruptcy Court | October 20, 2010 | Bankruptcy court cancelled the hearing on the motion for protective order. DE 1077. | +| State Court | November 23, 2010 | Epstein files his amended privilege log. | +| Bankruptcy Court | December 16, 2010 | LM filed a motion requesting a stay of the Order directing the preparation of a privilege log until after the time when the State court ruled on the then pending Motion for Summary Judgment. DE 1236. | +| Bankruptcy Court | December 22, 2010 | Bankruptcy court entered an order extending the time for production of the privilege log until January 31, 2011. DE 1260. | +| State Court | January 25, 2011 | FJWEFL produced 8,408 pages of non-privileged documents to Epstein. | +| Bankruptcy Court | January 26, 2011 | FJWEFL served a privilege log, and the sufficiency of that log was challenged by Epstein in the bankruptcy court. DE 1442. | +| State Court | February 8, 2011 | Epstein filed a Motion to Compel/Motion to Determine if Privilege Claims are Waived for failure to provide a privilege log. | +| Bankruptcy Court | February 15, 2011 | FJWEFL filed a privilege log in the Bankruptcy Court. | +| Bankruptcy Court | February 23, 2011 | FJWEFL filed an updated privilege log (the current privilege log) detailing the emails where privilege was being maintained. In addition to filing the privilege log, FJWEFL produced to counsel for Epstein, 12,711 pages of documents divided into two separate categories respectively labeled "attorneys eyes only" and "██████████ Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails." Two boxes of "attorneys eyes only" documents were produced containing 1,829 pages of documents in the first box and 3,198 pages of documents in the second box. Two | + +Case No. 502009CA0408047OOOOCMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +| | | additional boxes of `Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails" were also | +|-------------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| State Court | March 30, 2011 | Judge entered an order staying the subpoena to the trustee. | +| State Court | May 27, 2011 | Order setting hearing on all motions relating to discovery an privilege issues | +| State Court | July 12, 2011 | Epstein's Motion for Leave to Use Attorneys Eyes 0 ocu ents produced | +| State Court | July 14, 2011 | protective order granted. Epstein I emails is overbroad | +| | | and not necessarily calculated to lead to a 'ssib e evidence. | +| State Court | March 9, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel and sSio Protective Order relating to the | +| | | subpoena to the Bankruptcy T e | +| State Court | April 10, 2012 | Order requiring Ed ce any non-privileged documents as | +| | | identified in paragrap ards's Motion to Compel and Amend | +| State Court | April 11, 2012 | Epstein files E Fd6ruary 23, 2011 Privilege Log from the Bankruptcy | +| | | This g identifies many of the privileged materials that Epstein is | +| | | nrthat g to use at trial. | +| State Court | April 11, 2012 | Epairsip, Motion to Compel production of documents from and for | +| State Court | April 23, 2 | Mn to Withdraw | +| State Court | r | | +| | i c e | | +| | May , fAi | _-Withdraw | +| State Court | a Naat/ | produces 163 pages of additional responsive documents in | +| State Court | May 8, 2012 | Order Requiring Better Privilege Log | +| State Court | May 15, 2012 | Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues. | +| State Court | May 15, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | +| State Court | May 30, 2012 | Epstein Amended Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | + +Case No. 502009CA040800=CMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on a' Privilege Log + +| State Court | June 19, 2012 | Order Setting hearing on Motion for Clarification. | +|--------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| State Court | August 3, 2012 | Hearing on Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues. | +| State Court | August 14, 2012 | Scarola letter to Judge ██████ enclosing proposed Order on Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues

Provided before Epstein's voluntarily dismissed his claims against ██████ | +| State Court | August 16, 2012 | Epstein voluntarily dismisses case against ██████ without prejudice. | +| State Court | August 17, 2012 | Judge ██████ grants ██████ Motion for Clarification and vacates his May 8, 2012 Order requiring an amended privilege log. 3

██████ April 12, 2012 Privilege Log remained in full force and effect. Epstein never challenged the sufficiency of that privilege log or made any attempt to overrule ██████ privilege assertions or compel production of these privilege materials. | + +14. To summarize, was with a total of 27,590 emails to evaluate. On January 25, 2011, produ 8 pages of non-privileged emails to Epstein. On February 23, 2011, additional 12,711 pages of emails, which included 5,027 pages of emails that w designated "Attorney's Eyes Only." Between the January 25 and February 23, 2011 uct s, turned over 21,119 pages of emails to Epstein. properly list Xining 6,471 pages of emails on his privilege log filed on February 23, 2011 in the B ik Court. Pursuant to Epstein's July 12, 2011 Motion for Leave to Use Attorneys + +3 Judge Order also required to "file a written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012... [the response] shall identify, in a proper privilege log as referenced in the Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege." Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compel concerned e-mails between RRA lawyers and either (1) the Federal Government; (2) and (3) any news reporters. Because Epstein had already voluntarily dismissed his action against did not produce any written response to Paragraph 13 or any e-mails between RRA and these third-parties. And Epstein made no effort to seek production of these e-mails (at least, not through legitimate means). + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +Eyes Only Documents Produced Under Confidentiality Agreement, the Attorney's Eyes-Only documents are governed by a confidentiality agreement! + +15. On April 11, 2012, Epstein filed privilege log in this case. Pursuant to Judge August 17, 2012 Order vacating his prior Order requiring to ile a better privilege log, the February 23, 2011 Privilege Log filed in this case on April 1 full force and effect. ains in + +16. As referenced in the chart above, in May 2012, E privilege log was insufficiently descriptive resulting in his ity to question the various assertions of privilege. Based on this contention alone, it Epstein was not in possession of the documents listed on privilege lo re, Epstein could not possibly have relied on these privileged documents at any C e be the filing or during the continuation of his lawsuit against which was v' ly tsmissed only three months later on August 16, 2012. + +17. After voluntaril is 'ssing his claims against Epstein never sought to overrule any of these privi rtions or to compel production of the privileged materials listed on the log. Eps t as obviously been on notice of the privileged nature of those documents, knew the h withheld from production, and knew that it was unethical to retain the privileg ments regardless of how he had acquired them. + +Epstein's attempt to "confirm" with David Vitale, Esq., who only recently appeared in this case, that no confidentiality agreement exists further demonstrates the trial by ambush strategy of Epstein's counsel. The attorney to discuss that issue with, and to specifically identify that it related to RRA emails, was Jack Scarola, Esq., who has been handling the case since its inception. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +18. Yet Epstein now seeks to use at least forty-nine (49) clearly privileged emails listed on the February 23, 2011 Privilege Log and has refused repeated requests to identify how he came into possession of the privileged materials as well as repeated requests to turn over and to destroy the privilege materials, as his counsel is ethically required to do. + +## A Comparison of Privilege Log and Epstein's March 2, 2018 Untime r xhibits + +19. Epstein and his counsel are knowingly in possession of at l ine (49) privileged e-mails that are designated on 2012 Privilege L + +| Number of Privileged Emails in Epstein's Possession (49 TOTAL) | Numbers from Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibit #13 | Number/Range on February 23, 2011 Privilege Log | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 02645 | 02633-02646 | +| 1 | 00149 | 00149 | +| 1 | 01527 | 01527 | +| 1 | 04493 | 04491-04518 | +| 1 | 04494 | 04494 | +| 1 | 04495 | 04495 | +| 1 | 00014 | 00014 | +| 1 | 00090 | 00090 | +| 1 | 00133 | 00133 | +| 1 | 08006 | 08000-08011 | +| 1 | 00026 | 00026 | +| 1 | 01004 | 01003-01005 | +| 1 | 12289 | 12289 | + +| 1 | 26481 | 26479-26481 | +|-------|-------------|-------------| +| 1 | 26480 | 26479-26481 | +| 1 | 26356 | 26356 | +| 1 | 26570 | 26570 | +| 1 | 03731 | 03719-00iik | +| 3 | 06406-06408 | s 6408 | +| 1 | 01686 | 0 686 | +| 3 | 11123-11125 | 1123-11136 | +| 1 | 11126 | 11126 | +| 1 | 25925 | 25925 | +| 1 | 2nliei p, | 25874 | +| 1 | 45 | 11143-11146 | +| 1 | 191 | 03191-03196 | +| 5 | 398-04402 | 04387-04402 | +| 5 | 04408-04412 | 04403-04416 | +| 1 | 267476 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 08042 | 08033-08070 | +| | 26741 | 26741-26763 | +| ' ' ' | | | +| '3 | 08059-08061 | 08033-08070 | +| 3 | 26756-26758 | 26741-26763 | +| 3 | 08036-08038 | 08033-08070 | +| 1 | 26762 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 01117 | 01112-01117 | + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on MIIII Privilege Log + +| 3 | 08121-08123 | 08118-08123 | +|---|-------------|-------------| +| 4 | 26749-26752 | 26741-26763 | +| 3 | 08128-08130 | 08124-08156 | +| 3 | 08118-08120 | 08118-08123 | +| 3 | 08131-08133 | 08124-08156 | +| 3 | 08124-08126 | 08124-08156 | +| 4 | 08135-08138 | 08124-08156 | +| 1 | 27494 | 27494 | +| 1 | 26760 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 25997 | 25997 | +| 1 | 25937 | 25937 | +| 2 | 26604-26605 | 26604-26605 | +| 3 | 07019-07021 | 07019-07024 | + +## SuiCr of Relief Sought by + +20. Ily requests entry of an Order for the following relief: + +- g all exhibits produced by Epstein after December 20, 2017 in violation Court's July 20, 2017 Order, December 5, 2017 Oral Ruling, and January 16, 2018 Order; +- b. (2) Striking all proposed Epstein exhibits that contain or reference privileged materials specifically listed on 2011 Privilege Log; + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +- c. (3) Striking any and all pleadings, motions and portions of deposition transcripts, in which Epstein's counsel improperly utilized privileged materials to drive the nature of that discovery; +- d. (4) Precluding Epstein's counsel from making any mention or use o any struck exhibits or pleadings, including the privileged materials; +- e. (5) Ordering Epstein, and his counsel, to show cause as t when) they came into possession of materials listed on 11 P t ege Log; +- f. (6) Awarding his attorneys' fees and m the date Epstein first came into possession of privileged materials, defending his case, and failed to properly disclose his possession o erials to and the Court; and +- g. (7) Any such further relief ourt deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +WHEREFORE, Counter- iEspectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion to Strike s Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to D Log as requested is Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege + +O + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 5th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Case No. 502009CA040800=CMBAG + +Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on a' Privilege Log + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 "S C) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt i teLaw.com + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for Brad J. + +J. •utre + +staff.efil toj tice.com + +425 N enue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lau ,FL 33301 + +Phone: (95 524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +#### GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMEL46M OSITE EXHIBITS + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. b a 'through undersigned counsel, hereby files this General Objections to Untimely Compoa xht"lilts, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. At the December 5, 2 1 1-set hearing, the Court ordered Counter-Plaintiff to produce copies of any exhibi C tot 6) previously been produced by no later than December 20, 2017. (12/5/17 Tr. 216, 219" 228). +- 2. That Tulin ss memorialized in the Court's January 16, 2018 Order on Plaintiff/Cou,r-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section B Trial Exhibits), as follows: + +On or before December 20, 2017, shall produce to Epstein all trial exhibits that have not been previously produced in the form to be introduced at trial... + +- 3. Yet on February 2, 2018, undersigned counsel received letter correspondence from Epstein's counsel, which enclosed a flash drive "containing additional documents for [Epsteinj's + +trial Exhibit Nos. 18, 35, 48, 323 and 324. We are still obtaining additional public records and will provide those to you upon our receipt." The numbered exhibits are `catch-ails' as follows: + +- a. #18 Court docket and all court filings referenced therein for L.M. v Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 50-2008-CA-028051; AA' +- b. #35 Court docket and all court filings referenced the ' .W. v. Jeffre Epstein, case no. 50-2008-CA-028058; +- c. #48 Court docket and all court filings reference th 2for Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-cv-80893; +- d. #323 All public records and t 8se e cles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adle iils , J. ME and any witnesses listed by either party; +- e. #324 All co QC s and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to s claims. + +4. e tests to all such late produced exhibits, whether contained in the February 2, 2018 flash drive or intended to be produced in the future, as violative of the Court's December 5, 2017 ruling and January 16, 2018 order. ii + +5. Additionally, the Court has previously ruled that, with regard to any "catch-all" exhibits listed on either party's exhibit list, the party must separately identify and list individually each exhibit sought to be relied upon by the listing party. + +6. therefore reserves all objections to all composite exhibits that fail to comply with this order by the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of February, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +NOTA CERTIFY + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ J. Edwards + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +General Objection to Untimely Composite Exhibits +Page 5 of 5 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. + +CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA04 B Judge David F. + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +SCOTT R ' 11. 0individually, and J. , individually, + +Defen.: ants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S N ILING PRIVILEGE LOG OF FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, , FISTOS & LEHRMAN DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2011 IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANT BRADLEY E I WARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS + +Plaint' , Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby gives notice of filing the Privilege Log of\_, Jaffe, Weissing, Ed ards, Fistos & Lehrman Dated February 23, 2011 (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) in Support of P aintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents From Defendant and rSanctions. + +Dated April 10, 2012. + +Respectfully su mitted, + +seph L. Ackerman45Jr. aB 5 4 BURNETT, P.A. + +Tr West BURNETT, P.A. 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein + +and + +E. Knight 0 BURNE ,P. + +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true d correct copy of the foregoing was sent via Federal Express on this 10th day of April, illy Ann la., Esq., The IA Law Firm, Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor, 1441 Bri' ll Avenue, Miami, FL 33131; Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian AYen South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law O S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; J. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +seph L. Ackerm , Jr. + +**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION** +[www.flsb.uscourts.gov](http://www.flsb.uscourts.gov) + +IN RE: + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**PRIVILEGE LOG** + +**[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, [REDACTED] FISTOS & +LEHRMAN** + +Dated: February 23, 2011 + +Total of 159 pages + +**EXHIBIT** +tabbler +1 + +### Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|------------------| +| 08076-08089 | 08/04/2009 | a | Spencer Kuvin | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez | | +| 08311-08318 | 05/26/2009 | a | Katherine Ezell | WPB-Confidential-General | | +| 08319-08324 | 10/16/2009 | a | Amy Ederi | WPB-General-Confidential | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08398 | 09/01/2009 | a | Kikka Claudio | C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et | | +| 08402 | 09/17/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Report this as a parole violation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08415 | 09/16/2009 | | Margaret Berk | Scanned document from | | +| 08422 | 08/11/2009 | ES | Katherine Ezell | Subpoena directed to the | | +| | | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10060 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Epstein-Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10069-10074 | 08/04/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Transcript of Alfredo | | +| 10077-10079 | 08/06/2009 | a | Mercedes | RE:Epstein vs. Jane Doe No.101 | | +| 10099-10102 | 08/27/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | RE: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10192 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Trump Depo moved 08/18 to | | +| 10194-10195 | 08/11/2009 | Jacqule Johnson | Kikka Claudio | FW: Out of state subpoenas | —Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10264-10266 | 08/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | RE:Epstein-Letter regarding | | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 10279-10291 08/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE: Epstein-Notice of production | | +| 10372-10373 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv, | +| 10490.10493 | 09/21/2009 | Amy Ederi | FW: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10592.10593 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv, | +| 10604-10620 | 10/01/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:meeting w/ atty fr wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10639.10643 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | Meeting w/Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10700-10702 | 10/13/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10724-1073 | 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10897 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein-' Leslie Wexner | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10992-11005 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11011-11021 06/23/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11026-11032 | 07/09/2009 | Edwards Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | commissioner | +| 11072.11074 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Possible witness | from | +| 11166-11169 | 06/23/2009 Katherine Ezell | | RE:Articte:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | + +• + +## Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +MS Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|--------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 11240-11245 | 06/22/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P riv. | +| 11248-11250 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | Article:Bear Steams | JoInt4/P Pnv. | +| 11255-11259 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | USAO Chose | Edwards Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11269-11281 06/30/2009 | | Stuart | | | +| | | | RE:Epstein | Depo;possible | +| 11316-11319 | 06/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Discussion about | possible | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11332-11336 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | FW:Transcript | of Alfrefo | +| 11340-11341 | 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | RE:Epstein vs.Jane Doe No.101 & | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11348-11358 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Motion for | protective | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11430-11434 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Discussion | RE:Wexner | +| 11443 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Wexner served subpoena . | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11541-11542 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Leslie Wexner & Bob | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11551-11559 | 10/01/2009 | Spen tic in | RE:Meeting w.Stanely Arkin | Joint w/p Priv. | +| 11585-11586 | 10/14/2009 ÷ | owitz | RE:Epstein;t.arry | Visoski | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11675-11676 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | RE:Leslie Wexner attorney Info | Joint W/P Priv. | + +4 • + +#### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 15981-15988 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Attachment:Kellen & Trump | +| 15999-16007 | 08/05/2009 | Bert Patton | Jacqule | RE:Epstein Depo-New York Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16057-16065 | 08/06/2009 | Mercedes | Jacquie | Trump and Maxwell Dep dates Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15918-15949 | 08/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | stein Depots 08/14,17,18 in | +| 16066-16069 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trump, Wexner convo | +| 16095-16098 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trumo,Wexner Convo | +| 15813.15814 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | | Wexler Lawyer's info Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15856 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Depo-NY;2 Attachments Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15866-15881 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | E .stein Depos 08 14 17 18 in | +| | | | | /PDF of | +| 15893-15901 08/03/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | Depo &subpoena notice for | +| 15360-15363 | 09/01/2009 | Jacqule | Mercedes | RE:Alan Dershowitz;Harvard Law | +| 15394-15397 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Katherine Ezell | ' RE:E tein-D os of Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15413-15428 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | RE:Esptein-Notice of Prodcution | +| 15434.15437 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | Notice Of Production from Non | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 15454-15475 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Critton's notice of depo;Epstein | | +| 01465 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15485-15492 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15493-15500 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | RE:Deposition | of Jean Luc | +| 15501-15555 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquile | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15556-15564 | 09/22/2009 | Jacquie | Margaret Berk | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15565-15575 | 09/25/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa= | | | +| | | | | 'FVV:Deposition | of Jean Luc Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15687-15688 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa | / A, | | +| 15692-15707 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Sranley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15708-15709 | 10/06/2009 | Jacqule | Mercedes | REJane Does 2-8v. Epstein-Cross | | +| 15033-15032 | 08/05/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15087-15093 | 08/06/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15094-15100 | 08/06/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15109-15112 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Depositions for | + +4.. + +## Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|--------------|---------------|---------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 15122-15125 | 08/11/2009 | Jacqule | Kikka Claudio | RE: Ms. Maxwell | Depo | +| 15142-15158 | 08/11/2209 | | Kikka Claudio | FW:out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15166-15170 | 08/11/2009 | Jacqule | Kikka Claudio | RE:out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15171-15172 | 08/11/2009 | Jacqule | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15178-15182 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | | +| 15306-15355 | 08/25/2009 | Jacqule | Kikka Claudio | FW:Epsteln Depo Notices & Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14951-14952 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14954-14972 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | RE:Epstein-Depo of Mark Epstein | | +| 14979-14981 08/03/2009 | | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14983-15015 | 08/04/2009 | Jacqule | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epsteln Der sitions 8/14.17, | | +| 16501-16519 | 09/15/2009 | Adam HoroAttz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16520.16547 | 09/09/2009 | Spe c e , ,5 | in Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Deposition of Jane | | +| 16355-16384 | 08/24/2009 + | orowitz | Jacqule | Epstein Depo Notices and Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16554-16568 | 09/16/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epsteln Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe, Weissing.S Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 16574-16577 | 09/17/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epsteln Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16396-16398 | 09/01/2009 | Margaret | Jacquie | Alan Dershowitz | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 16578-16581 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16582-16585 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Deposition | of Jean We | +| | 16585.16611 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint w/P Priv. | +| 16612-16439 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo of Mark Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16440 | 08/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Steam | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16740-16753 | 09/22/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16443-16452 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Epstein-Depos of | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16777-16786 | 09/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16793-16794 | 10/01/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie | RE:Depo of David Hart Rogers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16462-16477 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| 16802-16823 | 10/02/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16483-16486 | 09/10/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|----------------|-----------------|------------------------------|-----------------| +| 16874-16880 | 10/13/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16904-16905 | 10/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16945 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 17033-17034 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacqule | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02065-02068 | 06/08/2009 | | Mercedes | FW:Epstein-Confirming | AT&T | +| 02070 | 09/02/2009 | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | aF ili-De | s of | +| 02071 | 08/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Stems | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02072-02078 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | FW.E . stein-De . os | of | +| 03466-03468 | 05/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Actvlty in | Case 9:08-cv | +| 02301-02302 | 09/09/2009 | Paul Cassel | Bradley | FW:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 03122-03123 | 06/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | FW: Motion to Dismiss | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02805-02806 | 05/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Katherine Ezell | REMPB-Confidential-Genereal | | +| 02670-02671 10/21/2009 | | | Spencer Kuvin | FW:Subpoena info | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02517-02519 | 10/02/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | FW:MeetIng w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | + +4 4 a + +#### Privileae Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02614.02617 | 08/05/2009 | Kikka Claudio | FW:Proposal Request | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15702.15704 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15581-15585 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Ederi | FW:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15431-15433 | 09/10/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| 15797-15798 | 10/14/2009 Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11560-11562 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine | Jacqule FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11444-11448 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Ederi | FW:Epsteln Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05823 | 09/04/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacqule Johnson | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05832 | 09/08/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05838 | 09/08/2009 Jacquie | Jack Hill | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05847 | 09/09/2009 Jacqule | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv, | +| 05859 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05863-05864 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05886-05887 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe WeissIng, FIstos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-------------|-----------------| +| 05902.05903 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05906-05907 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05912 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05928-05930 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05933-05934 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05936 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05938 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05940-05941 09/18/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05951 | 05/29/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05957-05960 | 09/09/2009 | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05970.05971 10/21/2009 | Jacqule | Margaret Berk | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05982-05983 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05993-05994 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05997 | 08/06/2009 | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|---------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01029 | 10/08/2009 | Carolyn | Brian Ryalls | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07707 | 09/03/2009 BradleyEdwards | Kikka Claudio | RE:Regarding:C.M.A. vs. Epstein. | | +| 07708-07709 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Cali | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07734 | 07/24/2009 | | RE:Release | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07218-07219 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06861-06863 | 05/12/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06876-06879 | 05/12/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06891-06897 | 05/12/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06901 | 09/11/2009 | Mercedes | Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06902 | 09/15/2009 | Mercedes | RE: Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06903 | 09/04/2009 | Mercedes | RE: Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06806-06807 | 09/09/2009 | Edwards Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06712 | 10/19/2009 | Kikka Claudio | RE: Igor Zinoview depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06713-06714 | 09/15/2009 | Robert Josefberg | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------| +| 06720-06727 | 10/14/2009 | Jack. | RE: Igor Zinoview depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06728 | 09/09/2009 | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06711 | 09/09/2009 | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | r ,,„ Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06472 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI Epstein Depo | L Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06460-06464 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI Epsteln,DepoV | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06455-06459 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI Epstelhpepo | | +| | | | \A \P | | +| 06448-06452 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06420-06427 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Edwards RE:FYI Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06416-06419 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Edwards RE:FYI Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05925-05926 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Edwards FW:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05883-05584 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05022-05025 | 09/10/2010 | Adam Horowitz Jacquie | | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | +| 04724-04725 | 05/27/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | RE:Epstein Cases-depostions in | +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +| 06990-07002 | 06/11/2009 | Brad Katherine W. Ezell | June 1016 | hearing-WPB | +| 07003-07006 | 06/26/2009 | Amy Ederi Brad | June 251h | hearing-WPB- Joint-privilege | + +| M | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-----------------------|------------|----------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------| +| 07030 | 09/22/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | L.M. v. Epstein — defendant, | | +| | | | | Jeffrey Epstein's response to | | +| 07090-07091 9/29/2009 | | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07092 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | J. | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07093 | 09/17/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01484 | 05/21/2009 | Robert C. | | | | +| | | | 1 | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01503 | 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J.M | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01517 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz; | | | | +| | | | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01514 | 08/26/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | 1 | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01515 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01477 | 07/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz; | | | | +| | | | J. Edwards | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01489 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07110-07112 | 09/25/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | | +| 07113-07114 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07115-07116 | 09/25/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07145-07146 | 09/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07211-07213 | 10/01/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07210 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | Robert c. | | | | +| | | | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 07214-07215 | 10/01/2009 | Robert | | | | +| | | C. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | .rivilege | +| 07216-07217 | 10/02/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07220-07223 | 10/01/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07224-07225 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine | | | | +| | | W. | J. | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07226.07227 | 10/01/2009 | Robert | | | | +| | | C. | Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07228-07229 | 10/01/2009 | J. | Robert | | | +| | | | | C. Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07280-07283 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Motion for protective order | Joint-privilege | +| 07633-07634 | 08/06/2009 | J. | Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 07710-07733 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine | | | | +| | | W. | J. Edwards | Regularly Monthly Cong. Call | Joint-privilege | +| 07740-07746 | 09/18/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 07748-07757 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Report this as a parole violation | Joint- rivilege | +| 07913-07915 | 08/27/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | | Joint-privilege | +| 07917-07918 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | | Joint-privilege | +| 07965-07966 | 08/12/2009 | Katherine | | | | +| | | W. | Bradley J. | Subpoena | directed to the | +| 07977-07978 | 10/09/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 01716 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Elizabeth Villar | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations | | +| 01768 | 08/06/2009 | Richard Willits | J. | Epstein Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01771-01772 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01931 | 08/11/2009 | J. | Lisa | | | +| | | | | Alfredo Rodriguez | Joint-privilege | + +#### PrIvIle e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|----------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01998-01999 | 09/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Margaret Beth | Correct Number | — Epstein | +| 02021 | 05/14/2009 | is | J. Mercedes | C. Doe v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02044 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine | W. | | | +| | | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — | | +| 02048 | 09/04/2009 | Robert | C. | | | +| | | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Ea | | +| 02054 | 05/12/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Emalling Epstein | deposition | +| 02062 | 10/05/2009 | | J. Amy Ederi | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | in Tel. Conf. | for Monday, | +| | | | | 10/5/09 at 4:00 p.m. | | +| 02087 | 09/17/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Epstein- Hearing | Joint-privilege | +| 02140 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Epstein Depo — New York | Joint-privilege | +| 02147-02149 | 09/21/2009 | | J. Amy Ederi | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 02174 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. Edwards | Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of | | +| 02209-02210 | 07/01/2009 | Bert Patton | William J. Berger | Epstein v. State of Florida — | | +| 02215-02217 | 07/24/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02290 | 09/18/2009 | | J. Spencer Kuvin | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02355-02356 | 06/10/2009 | Mercedes | C. Susan K. Stirling | Hearing taken | on 06/10/09 | +| 02362-02363 | 06/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 02374-02375 | 09/15/2009 | Jack | J. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | + +| M | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|---------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------| +| | 02420-02421 05/08/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02435 | 09/15/2009 | J. | Us | Jane Does v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02438 | 09/18/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DCII W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 02462 | 09/22/09 | Spencer Kuvin | la | L.M. v. Epstein — Defendant, | | +| | | | | Plantiff L.M."s | Motion for | +| 02476-02477 | 09/25/2009 | 5 enter Kuvin | | JAM VA v EPSTEIN hearing | Joint-privilege | +| 02516 | 10/06/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02554-02559 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | NEW ASSIGNMENT | — NEW | +| 02584 | 08/11/2009 | J. | Kikka M. Claudio | Out of state subpoenas | Joint-privilege | +| 02618 | 08/04/2009 | J. | Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 02627-02628 | 09/18/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 02672-02673 | 10/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 02727 | 08/03/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley J. | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez | | +| 02896 | 06/08/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 03009-03010 | 08/07/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Motion to stay | Joint-privilege | +| 03028-03029 | 09/21/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 03038 | 10/06/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermeistein | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 03131-03132 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Epstelns assets | Joint-privilege | + +| EM | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|--------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 03243-03244 | 09/09/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | EPSTEIN | Joint-privilege | +| 03397-03400 | 09/29/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | +| 03407-03414 | 09/29/2009 | a J. | Adam Horowitz | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | +| 03451-03452 | 05/14/2009 | la J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893- | | +| 03477-03479 | 05/15/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:05-cv-50993- | | +| 03619-03627 | 09/15/2009 | I | Spencer Kuvin | BB v. Epsteln/EW v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 03631-03633 | 09/15/2009 | lac• uie | William J. Berger | 68 vLEzt!in/EW v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 03646-03656 | 10/19/2009 | 1. | Katherine W. Ezell | Bill = | Subpoena & Depo | +| 03677-03687 | 07/08/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Can you send | me those | +| 03719-03736 | 09/04/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | CMA — depo notices attached. | Joint-privilege | +| 03840-03847 | 08/02/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | 1. | Continuing Deposition of Alfredo | | +| 03938-03939 | 09/29/2011 | Katherine W. | | | | +| | | | J. | Deposition of Bill | Joint-privilege | +| 03943-03945 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhn& | Joint-privilege | +| 02911-02912 | 09/15/2009 | J. | Jack P. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 02939 | 07/14/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jane Does 2.7 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02977 | 10/16/2009 | Katherine W. | J. | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | + +| M | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-----------------|--------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02978 | 10/29/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermelstein | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02994 | 06/10/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Preservation of evidence | Joint-privilege | +| 07060 | 10/16/2009 | Sid | 3.. | L.M. V. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06202 | 07/13/2009 | Richard Willits | J. | Scheduling ,various depositions | | +| 06409-06415 | 04/15/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | FYI | | +| 06428-06447 | 05/06/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI c ey | Joint-privilege | +| 06453-06454 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| | 06465-06471 04/15/2009 | Katherine W. | | | | +| | | | | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06476-06490 | 05/08/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | 4,1( N | Joint-privilege | +| 06630-06632 | 09/09/2009 | S ncer Kuvin | | J.Ellr Nearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06636-06639 | 09/09/2009 | J. | Robert | C. | | +| | | | | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06702-06705 | 09/16/2009 | J. | Kikka M. Claudb | Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola | | +| 06706-06708 | 10/14/2009 | J. | Kikka M. Claudio | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06715-06719 | 10/09/2009 | Jack P. | 1. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06729-06735 | 10/13/2009 | J. | Jack P. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06763 | 08/19/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermelstein | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06764-06766 | 09/10/2009 | Bradley J. | Stuart Mermelstein | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| | 06770-06781 09/10/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | J. | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06811-06812 | 08/20/2009 | Katherine W. | J. | Is Mark Epstein JE's brother? | Joint-privilege | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 06817-06819 | 09/23/2009 | Adam Horowitz | sJ | Is your client being deposed | | +| 06820-06822 | 07/02/2009 | J. | Margaret Berk | Jane Doe 2 | ) v. Epstein JoInt-prIvilege | +| 06841-06860 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06864-06875 | 05/12/2009 | S ncer Kuvin | | J.E. Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06880-06890 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06898-06900 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermeistein | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06933-06934 | 07/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | Jane Does 2.7 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06937-06938 | 10/05/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Jane Does 2.8 v. Epstein — Cross | | +| 06944-06952 | 09/22/2009 | a J. | Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DOI W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 16107 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 16123-16124 | 08/11/2009 | Kikka M. Claudio | | | | +| | | | Jacquie Johnson | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 16799-16801 | 10/02/2009 | Robert C. | | | | +| | | | Jacqule Johnson | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 02947-02948 | 08/03/2009 | S encer Kuvin | Jacquie Johnson | Epstein Deno— New York | Joint-privilege | +| 02891.20906 | 10/01/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 20880-20882 | 10/02/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 06042-06090 | 07/02/2009 | William J. Berger | Spencer Kuvin | Ew 09-22784 cert.4th | dca Joint-privilege | +| 06402-06403 | 06/10/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 01365.01366 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint-privilege | +| | 01340-01341 07/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jac • uie | Epstein Depositions | Joint-privilege | +| 01331 | 06/30/2009 | Stuart | J. | Epstein depositions | Joint-privilege | + +**Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | Mermelstein | | | | +| 01319 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01316 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01314 | 10/30/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Epstein Depo of Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01298 | 05/26/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Adam Horowitz | Epstein cases – depositions in federal cases | Joint-privilege | +| 01294 | 08/10/2009 | Jack P. [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Assets | Joint-privilege | +| 01273 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | [REDACTED] W. [REDACTED] | Epstein 2255 claims | Joint-privilege | +| 01250 | 05/13/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01246 | 04/08/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein – Telephone Conference | Joint-privilege | +| 01233-01234 | 07/31/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein – Monday, 8/3/09 – Monthly call in telephone conference – AT&T Call in No: (877) 468-2136 – participant code: 775593. Kathy is the host. | Joint-privilege | +| 01224 | 06/16/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes Estrada | C. Epstein – Monday, 8/3/09 – Monthly call in telephone conference – AT&T Call in No: (877) 468-2136 – participant code: 775593. Kathy is the host. | Joint-privilege | +| 01185 | 10/30/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein – Confirming AT&T dial in tel. conf. for Monday, 11/2/09 at 4:00 p.m. | Joint-privilege | +| 01186 | 10/02/2009 | [REDACTED] Edwards | J. Mercedes | C. Epstein – Confirming AT&T Dial in Tel. Conf. for Monday, 10/5/09 at 4:00 p.m. | Joint-privilege | +| 01187 | 05/19/2009 | [REDACTED] J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein – Confirming AT&T Dial in Telephone Conference for Monday, 6/8/09 at 2:00 p.m. | Joint-privilege | + +| a | GATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|---------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------| +| 01188 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| 01189 | 09/08/2009 | la J. | (liana Yarzabal | Epstein - Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | in Telephone Conference | for | +| 01095-01096 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Deposition of Epstein was set for | | +| 01045 | 07/23/2009 | J. | Richard Willits | CMA vs. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01649 | 07/08/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01641 | 06/11/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01639 | OS/29/2009 | | J. Mies | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01619 | 10/28/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01660 | 07/22/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01666 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01671 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine W. | | | | +| | | | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01680 | 08/24/2009 | Jack P. | | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 04355-04358 | 09/04/2009 | Jack Sea rola | | | | +| | | | J. | Epstein — D !A. | of Joint-privilege | +| 04446 | 09/03/2009 | J. | Iliana Yarzabal | Epstein — | Monday 8/3/09 — | +| | | | | Monthly Call | in Telephone | +| | 04200-04201 09/04/2009 | | Katherine W. Ezell | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| | 09/04/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| | 04222.04223 09/04/2009 | I | Barry | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilege | + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------| +| 04264 | 05/12/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 04298-04299 | 09/16/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Depo of Epstein | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 04304 | 09/08/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04335 | 10/30/2009 | i Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Confirming AT&T Tel. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04359.04360 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie Katherine Ezell | of Is | all Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04365 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein- Depo in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04417 | 09/17/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein- Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04423.04424 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Letter regarding Leslk Wexner | | +| 04433.04436 | 06/16/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04447.04450 | 07/31/2009 | Jac•ule Mercedes | Monthly Call in Tel. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04491-04518 | 04/08/2009 | Jack Scarola | Epstein- Tel. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04518 | 04/08/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Tel Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04524-04525 | 05/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04580 | 10/14/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoski | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04640-04641 10/14/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoski | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04723 | 05/26/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein cases- Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04726-04729 | 05/26/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Epstein cases- Witness depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04750-04754 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein depo- New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04763-04785 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depo Notice | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04797-04799 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04806-04813 | 07/28/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depos in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04819 | 07/30/2009 | | | | +| | | Jack Scarola Jacquie | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04831.04832 | 07/30/2009 | Spencer Kuvin Jacquine | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04835.04836 | 07/25/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | + +## Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +=, Jaffe, Weissing,IIIIIFistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|-----------------|--------------------------------|-----------------| +| 04711 | 08/10/2009 | | Jacks | Epstein assests | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04855-04858 | 08/18/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04861 | 07/24/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04876-04877 | 07/27/2009 | | Spencer Amin | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04922-04923 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04925-04926 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04929-04934 | 09/25/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04937-04938 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | E Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04969-04972 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Edwards | Alfredo Rodriguez Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05026-05027 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule Johnson | Notice of Production from Non• | | +| 05031 | 09/25/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv, | +| 05037-05038 | 09/25/2009 | Edwards | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05042-05043 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kw% | | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05046 | 09/25/2009 | | Spener Kuvin | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05074-05076 | 08/18/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | Jacqule | Epstein Sub. To Bears Stern | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|----------------------------------| +| 05100-05102 | 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | Improper Serving of Maxwell | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05105-05107 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Hearing on Yellow Cab Objection | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05110 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz Klkka Claudio | Address for | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05118-05119 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion for Protective Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05157-05158 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion for Protective Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05167-05168 | 05/29/2009 | Margaret Berk | Spencer Cross-Examination | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05171-05172 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Transcripts | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05201-05202 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Rules on Doe no. 4 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05222-05223 | 07/10/2009 | Katherine Ezell | File case | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05226 | 07/10/2009 | Spencer Kwin | Epstein 5th | Amendment rights Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05229 | 07/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motions to Compel | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05232.05233 | 07/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motions fully briefed | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05247 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Answers to the 1" set of ROGS | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05251-05252 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Depo dates | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05258 | 07/25/2009 A | ine Ezell | Switzerland Witness regarding | | +| 05265.05266 | 07/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz Spencer Kuvin | Alfredo Rodriguez depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| 05286-05287 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Switzerland Witness regarding | | +| 05293-05294 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Calling Switzerland witness | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05326-05327 | 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Emails searchable | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05331 | 08/06/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Epstein address | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05334-05335 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | TV interview that is too explicit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05347 | 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking Computers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05350 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Current address for Nadia | | +| 05353-05354 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Distribution of Costs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05367 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Edwards Volcemall | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05373-05374 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio Bradley Edwards | Supoenas for depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05391-05393 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Edwards Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05400-05401 10/19/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Religious Dildo Washer | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05414-05415 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | current address Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05437-05439 | 04/20/2009 | Bradley Edwards Spencer Kuvin | Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P PrN. | +| 05444-05445 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Setting Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05451 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------| +| 05469 | 07/08/2009 | Mercedes | Judge Marra's July 6th | Order Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05476-05494 | 07/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | NPA from | Villafana Join/P Priv. | +| 05546 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05579-05581 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking all of Plaintiffs | | +| 05613-05618 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Non-Pros Agreement | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05633 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion to freeze assets | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05638-05639 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Daliah Weiss | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05647 | 07/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz Katherine Ezell | NPA under seal for In camera | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05656 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Supoenas for depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05659 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05668 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Florida Science Foundation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05705 | 09/09/2009 | Mercedes Kikka Claudio | Video tape of Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05724 | 05/29/2009 | Jack Scarola | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05727 | 05/29/2009 | Bradley Edwards Sid | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05730-05731 08/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacqule | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05734 | 05/29/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacquie | Motion for status conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +## =Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------| +| 05737 | 08/12/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | NPNP and sub to Palm Beach | | | +| 05750 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Spencer Kuvin | Motion for status cord. | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05770 | 07/08/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | NPA in camera review | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05774-05776 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | being rescheduled | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05782-05783 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Motion to appoint commissioner | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05788.05790 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Notice and serve everyone | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05802 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | gill being split up evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05806 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | Bill will be split evenly for each | | | +| 05812 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Bill will be split evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05814 | 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05818-05819 | 09/09/2009 | | Robert Josefsberg | CMA Order | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 01781 | 05/01/2009 | Edwards | William Berger | Epstein Depo | Work Product;attorney | client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of | admissible | +| 07619 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attomey | client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of | admissible | + +#### e Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03182-03185 07/14/2009 William Berger Litigation Stra Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03186-03188 05/01/2009 William Berger M EPS* | | | | | | +| K Sf | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13860-13874 05/28/2009 Elizabeth Christinla Fitch | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 14173 10/21/2009 Gary Brad Stanely Arkin Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13419 08/11/2009 Denis klelic Trump's Depo Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03087 06/29/2010 A Inv rs Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03088 04/11/2009 Epstein Litigation Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +#### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|-------------------------------------------------|----|------------| +| Team | | | privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to | | | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03089-03099 05/03/2009 Attorneys and | | | | | | +| Adler RE: Setting Depos Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13445-13453 08/19/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| ,A, \N", | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 12281-12291 07/30/2009 Carl Linder UtIgatiktNegto) Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09337.09340 08/10/2009 Barry i ctirc i-Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09350 10/21/2009 Barry Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09335 08/06/2009 Barry Bradley Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11983 08/06/2009 Cad Under Jacquie Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11984-11988 08/06/2009 Carl Under Litigation Strategy , ; | | | | | | +| | Work | | Product;attorney | | client | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11995 08/19/2009 Carl Under Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 12012 10/21/20009 Cad Under Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11879 10/21/2009 Cara Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11868 08/19/2009 Cara Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 10938 05/28/2009 Paul Ca Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13592 10/21/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 04421 05/21/2009 Will Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25814 05/28/2009 W lam Berger Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 25778-25782 07/30/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25792-25797 05/28/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy obvevork | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25798 08/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Stra Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25799-25802 08/10/2009 William Berger tegY | | | | | | +| IICHSPI I\ | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25773 10/21/2009 William Berger Edwards igation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| ) 25738 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25739-25740 08/11/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 17940 07/30/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17917-17927 | 08/03/2009 | Jonathan Birkman | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 17932-17934 | 05/28/2009 | Jonathan Birkman | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 17935 | 05/28/2009 | Jonathan Birkman | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 17936-17938 | 07/30/2009 | Jonathan Birkman | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00014 | 05/01/2009 | █ █ | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00015 | 05/04/2009 | █ █ | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00016 | 05/04/2009 | █ █ | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00017 | 05/06/2009 | █ █ | █ Adler | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00018 | 05/06/2009 | █ █ | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 0001900021 05/07/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00022 06/23/3009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00023 07/13/2009 Rob Buschel LItIgatio Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00024 07/13/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| e *2 | | | | | | +| t Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00025-00029 05/01/2009 Paul II | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00030 05/02/2009 m Berger | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00031 05/03/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00032 05/03/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00033-00034 05/03/3009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00035 05/05/2009 Susan Sterling Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00036 05/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00037-00040 05/25/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00041 07/06/2009 William e | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00042 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 0043 05/05 | | | | | | +| Susan Sterling Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00044 08/17/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jarre, weissing. ristos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------|-----------|-----------|------------| +| 00045 05/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00046 05/01/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy C .., Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00047.00049 05/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Str!n | | | | | | +| t ASLe | | | | | | +| Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00072 05/15/2009 Susan | | | | | | +| 1 ., | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00073 05/15/2009 Edwards lkissell Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00074 05/18/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00075 05/18/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +| DATE TO DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00076 05/18/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00077 04/04/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| / allk, | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00078 05/18/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00079 05/19/2009 Rob Buschel (Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00080 05/19/2009 Beth Willie | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00081.00082 05/20/2009 Paul Cassell litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00083-00085 05/21/2009 William Berger Utigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00086-00087 05/25/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe, Weissinrt. Fistos&Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00088 04/30/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00089 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00090 05/28/2009 William Berger Litigation Str,gic | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00091 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell Ut tegy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00092 05/28/2099 Rob Busthel | | | | | | +| ation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00093 06/01/2009 Wfillamlerger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00094-00095 06/23/2009 Edwards Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00096 07/06/2009 Bradley William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jane, weissing. ristos a Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00097 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00098-00100 07/07/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00101 07/09/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00102-00106 07/09/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| 40C -\ \ SY | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00107 07/10/2009 William Berger Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00108 07/10/2009 Paul CQI) | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00109 07/10/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00110 07/10/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00111 07/11/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +Jane, weissing. i 1-istos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00112-00120 05/012009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| ad | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00121 05/12/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy c | | | | | | +| Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00122 05/12/2009 Rob Buschel UtIgatkglict e | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00123 05/12/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| i St | | | | | | +| SL Ilgatio Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00124.00125 05/12/2009 Willa Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00126 05/22/2009 IIII Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00127 05/26/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +M, Jaffe. Welssing, M Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-----|------------------|------------|-----------------| +| 00128.00131 5/26/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| CiIr | toriklege;irrelevan | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| | | | Product;attorney | | dent | +| riv | | | | reasonably | calculatedentot | +| ' lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00132 5/21/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| 00133 06/23/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strate c | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00134 06/03/2009 Rob Eluschel Utigat Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00135-00137 06/03/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00138-00140 06/08/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00141 06/12/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00142 06/13/2009 Bradley Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00143-00145 06/15/2009 I Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00146 O6/29/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00147 06/29/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00148 04/22/2009 Rob Buschel Utigatio tegy | | | | | | +| cl do | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00149 04/26/2009 Adler | | | | | | +| < S*) | | | | | | +| 1 Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00150 04/24/2009 Litigation Team Rob B Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00151-00152 06/26/2009 Rah Kischel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 01036.01039 04/26/2009 Susan Sterling Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13313-13314 07/30/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | lead to I, the discovery of admissible | +| 13315 | 08/03/3009 | Denis Kleinfeld | Beth Williamson | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of admissible | +| 01080-01081 06/22/2009 | | Robert C. Buschel | J. | Jane Doe brother | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01077 | 05/28/2009 | Robert C. Buschel | J. | Doe family member | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02445-02446 | 05/05/2009 | | J. Susan K. Stirling | v. Atlantic asphalt | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03049 | 09/21/2009 | | J. D.F. | New addition to the case | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02425-02426 | 06/17/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | J. | Jane Doe v. Dukenik | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02669 | 09/24/2009 | | J. Jacquie | Subpoena for | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02647 | 08/06/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Samantha | info Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03688-03691 04/03/2009 | | Robin | T. | | | +| | | | J. | Case number assignments | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03692-03693 | 05/06/2009 | | J. Susan K. Stirling | Case list | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 15678-15680 | 09/29/2009 | Jacqule | J. | Sub ioena for | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 15689 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Client information | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02546-02547 | 09/22/2009 | D.F. | J. | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02809-02810 | 09/28/2009 | N.R. | J. | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02262 | 07/23/2009 | Jacquie | I. | Discussion re: | client/victim | +| 02807-02808 | 10/01/2009 | N.R. | J. | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03760-03828 | 04/01/2009 | RRA Personnel | RRA personnel | Client names/types of action/ | | +| 03759 | 04/01/2009 | Adler | 1. | Conflict Check for Brad | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08358-08359 | 09/14/2009 | Pat | JINNI | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------|----------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| 08364-08368 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08370 | 09/14/2009 | | J. Pat | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08374-08375 | 10/01/2009 | | J. Jacquie | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03878 | 06/12/2009 | | J. Robert C. Buschel | Curtis | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02955 | 04/20/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | 1. | Juskowich | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02932 | 07/17/2009 | Christina Fitch | J. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 11544-11545 | 09/28/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07432-07435 | 09/25/2009 | D.F. | J. | New addition to the case | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06906-06909 | 07/17/2009 | Christina Fitch | J. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06913-06914 | 06/22/2009 | | J. Susan K. Stirling | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| | 06030-06031 05/04/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | J. | Espina — Walmart case | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05646 | 07/08/2009 | | J. William J. Berger | Client meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05573 | 09/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | J. | Client meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05540 | 07/31/2009 | Amy Swan | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05273-05276 | 07/28/2009 | Amy Swan | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05264 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | J. | Client Info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05267-05270 | 07/27/2009 | Am Swan | J. | Client Info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02933 | 06/17/2009 | | J. M. G. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01292 | 09/18/2009 | | J. M.G. | Epstein article | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01068-01070 | 04/02/2009 | All Staff | Robin T. Kempner | Current case list of Brad | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01054-01055 | 04/02/2009 | All Staff | Robin T. Kempner | Updated case | list for Brad Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01033 | 05/06/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | J. | case list | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| | 01030-01031 04/03/2009 | | J. Robin T. Kempner | Case number assignments | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 01118-01120 | 09/22/2009 | J. MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01986-01989 | 04/02/2009 | J. Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01984-01985 | 04/02/2009 | 1 Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 25925 | 09/30/2009 | All Staff Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 25874 | 09/30/2009 | All Staff Robin T. Kempner | Additional name | added to | +| 08356-08357 | 09/16/2009 | NR | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| | 16760-16761 09/23/2009 | Jacquie | New Client | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08005 | 06/05/2009 | MG | New Client | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06915-06920 | 06/17/2009 | MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08360-08363 | 09/16/2009 NR | I | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 04101-04107 | 09/28/2009 | MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 04708-04710 | 09/18/2009 | MG | Epstein Article | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06910-06912 | 06/17/2009 | MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07909 | 08/10/2009 | Jane Doe I | Same silver car tag | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07637-07642 | 09/10/2009 | NR | NR Interview | Attorney/ Client Privilege | +| 06795.06799 | 08/19/2009 | Anthon P | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06542-06548 | 09/15/2009 | Pat | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06404-06408 | 09/10/2009 | Pat | NR Interview | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08338-08339 | 09/16/2009 | Edwards NR | New Client | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08505 | 09/14/2009 | NR | New Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02241-02242 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02243-02244 | 07/07/2009 | Bradley Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 0223B-02240 | 05/28/20009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02204 | 07/14/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 02298-02299 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02291 | 06/04/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information RE: | +| 02442-02443 | 08/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 02440.02441 10/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04318-04321 | 09/24/2009 | Confidential | | | +| 05111 | 06/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing las | nesses W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05152 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05164 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05166 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05169-05170 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | Bradley Edwards | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05173-05174 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05212-05213 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Secret Plea | Deal for Epstein | +| 05215-05217 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Secret Plea Deal | of Epstein | +| 05175.05189 | 07/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05194.05196 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05204.05206 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Prlv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05227-05228 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05230-05231 07/08/2009 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05303 | 08/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05344-05346 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05408 | 07/06/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05425-05429 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05433-05436 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05433-05436 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05446 | 07/07/2009 | | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05452-05464 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05535-05536 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Bradley Edwards | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05538-05539 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Bradley | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05550-05551 08/11/2009 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05577-05578 | 08/22/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05619-05620 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05650 | 08/06/200 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05688-05689 | 0/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 M TJaffe, Weissing,S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05693-05695 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05698 | 08/21/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05706-05709 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05720-05721 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05738-05739 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing Ne;WhilAiltype | l s | +| 05743-05745 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05754 | 08/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigatio Strategy | | +| 05759.05762 | 06/01/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05765-05768 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05771-05773 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| 05777.05779 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| 05784-05786 | 06/03/2009 | nfidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05791-05794 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| 05803 | Bradley | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | | | | discove of admissible evidence | +| 05836.05837 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05842.05843 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05848 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05852-05853 | 07/29/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05857-05858 | 07/31/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05952-05953 | 08/25/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06192-06197 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06198-06201 06/24/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06203 | 07/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06401 | 09/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06643-06651 09/17/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06788-06789 | 09/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06942-06943 | 09/26/2009 Confidential | | | | +| | | Edwards | Additional Information | RE: | +| 06953 | 08/14/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06955-06957 | 10/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06959-06961 08/11/2009 | | Edwards Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06963-06980 | 08/11/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06986-06989 | 10/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07010-07014 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------|---------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 07017-07018 | 09/04/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07143-07144 | 10/01/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07147-07150 | 09/18/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses —.. | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 10/13/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | , ' | | +| 07605-07615 | 09/07/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Straw 1 | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07646-07647 | 09/08/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing M Ittiesses | | +| 07674-07697 | 09/08/2009 | | Confidential Source | Pr di New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08376 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08380 | 09/18/2009 | | Confidential Source | litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08427-08430 | 09/24/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08450 | 05/17/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08507 | 10/03/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 10092-10098 | 08/31/2009 | Bradley _ .ads | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01610 | 06/03/3009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01612 | 06/04/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01451.01458 | 05/27/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------|-----------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 01608 | 07/03/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01606 | 07/02/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01510 | 08/25/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01506 | 08/24/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01493 | 08/10/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01488 | 08/03/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01486 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01483 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 01479 | 07/22/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | _Edwards | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | | | ,..... , | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 01449 | 05/22/2009 | | ConfidentiaI,50tt rat | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01433 | 10/20/2009 | | Confidential Source | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 15207-15208 | 08/14/2009 | lacquie | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 19716-19719 | 09/25/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 19730-19731 | 10/02/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01683 | 08/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01693 | 08/21/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| 03011 | 09/17/2009 | I | Confidential Source | Additional Information RE: | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 01755-01756 | 10/02/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 01756 | 06/22/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01770 | 10/08/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03126 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Additional information | RE: | | +| | | | | Epstein Strategy : 1 | | | +| 02006 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02060 | 09/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03487-03494 | 09/19/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| 02269 | 08/26/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Other Rape Victims | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02322-02323 | 10/16/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02595-02596 | 09/07/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02866-02867 | 09/25/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02895 | 08/31/2009 | Edw ds | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 02901 | 09/16/2009 | Confid I | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03032 | 09/18/2009 | Con nt' | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03057 | 10/13/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03070 | 07/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------|----------------------|-------------------------|-----|---|-------------------------------------------------| +| 03081-03082 | 09/21/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03144 | 10/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Providing Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03189-03190 | 10/14/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | R | , | | +| 04015 | 09/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02913 | 09/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02956.02957 | 08/31/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing Ne4Rneisses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02975 | 10/21/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04031-04055 | 08/12/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | | +| 04057 | 08/11/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Providing New Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04060 | 08/12/2009 | | Confidential Dice | Providing New Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | | +| | | | Ccmfi7dential Source | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05626 | 10/12/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05630-05631 | 10/12/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05664-05665 | 10/12/2009 | Bradley | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07976 | 08/14/2009 | Confidential | | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06655 | 06/09/2009 | Confidential | I | Utigation Strategy | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------| +| | | Source | | | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 19986-19987 | 09/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | Mike Fisten | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 04905-04906 | 07/15/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04946-04951 | 10/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | | +| | | | | L | c_ | | +| 05148 | 05/22/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05151 | 05/26/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Straw | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05161 | 05/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Stilk, | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05203 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05207-05208 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05220-05221 06/23/2009 | | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | Ed ds | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05224-05225 | 06/24/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | ■Edwards | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05239 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05277-05278 | 06/23/2009 | | Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05324-05325 | 06/23/2009 | Bradley Edwards | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05368-05369 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05387-05388 | 06/23/2009 | Bradley | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02811-02812 | 10/03/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | + +MB Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 01280-01288 | 09/18/2009 Confidential | | | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| | | | | | to discove of admissible evidence. | +| 01131-01134 | 10/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 00988 | 04/25/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10163.10167 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | | +| 10181.10188 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing Nett( | itnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10245-10251 | 09/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing NasWitnesses | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10364-10367 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10586.10591 | 09/24/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10625.10632 | 10/02/2009 | Confidential Sytureor | | | | +| | | | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10698-10699 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10718-10719 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential Source | | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10927-10937 | 05/28/2009 | Edwards Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10945-10954 | 05/29/2009 Bradley Edwards | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10964-10978 | 06/02/2009 Bradley | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10991 | 06/22/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 11006-11010 | 06/23/2009 | I Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11075-11076 | 07/29/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11080-11082 | 07/31/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11085-11097 | 09/04/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11123-11136 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11140-11142 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11150-11151 | 10/12/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 10390-10393 | 09/19/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11157-11165 | 10/25/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11170-11174 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ Edwards | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11184-11185 | 05/27/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ Edwards | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11188-11195 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11198-11200 | 05/28/2009 | ██████████ Edwards | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11208-11214 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information
Epstein Molestations | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11223-11236 | 06/01/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11260-11266 | 06/24/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11320-11325 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | + +MI Jaffe, Weissing,MN, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 11372-11373 | 08/11/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11380-11383 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11438-11442 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information RE: Epstein Molestations | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11549-11550 | 10/01/2009 | Confidential source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11574-11579 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| BOX 2 | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|----|-----| +| 08029-08032 09/14/2009 Tami Wolfe | | | | | | +| Z .\ | | | | | | +| 'Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 08026-08028 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07738-07739 05/13/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07747 09/17/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07758-07759 05/05/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|----|--------| +| 07760-07765 09/11/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| CI | Nesonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07766 10/11/2009 Jacquie Attorneys at RRA Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07767-07784 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy 7 | | | | | | +| x' Ni | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07785-07790 06/26/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07791 04/04/2009 Paul Cassell Edwards Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| ' ' | | | | | | +| 07792-07793 04/01/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| \c | discovery | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07794.07841 04/04/2009 Paul O. C4SP Full draft of motion to stay | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07842-07848 06/16/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|--------| +| 07849-07852 04/10/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 07853-07856 06/10/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 07857.07862 09/11/20O9 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 07863-07864 06/10/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| I s t | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 07685-07874 05/14/2009 Paul Cassell Edwards Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07875-07876 04/14/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to the | +| 07877-07884 08/03/20O9 lacquie Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to the | +| 07886-07888 08/02/2009 Cara Litigation Strategy | | | | | | + +a Jaffe, Weissing,Ila Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE M FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|----|-----| +| 07889-07892 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07893-07904 07/27/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| ‘, | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07905.07908 07/22/2009 Jacqu le Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07910-07912 08/10/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| ec) 7 | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07916 10/16/2009 Jacquie Edwa UtIpTen Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07919 08/27/2009 Jacquie Brad y E a ds Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 07920-07930 10/18/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05399 10/17/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05355.05357 09/09/2009 Adler I Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05375-05378 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ Edward | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05372 | 04/20/2009 | Marc Nurik | ██████ ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05380-05381 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05384-05385 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05348 | 09/15/2009 | ██████ ██████ | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05341 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Bradley ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05329-05330 | 04/09/2009 | Beth Williamson | ██████ ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05332-05333 | 05/20/2009 | William Berger | ██████ ██████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +| DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|----|--------| +| 05320.05323 07/30/2009 Amy Swan Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to the | +| 05312.05313 07/22/2009 Nora Batian Litigation Strategy IL " | | | | | | +| c li) | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05306-05307 07/22/2009 Nora Batian Litigation Stkt( | | | | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05302 07/22/2009 Attorney at RRA Litigation Strategy | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to the | +| 05281 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Review of litigation materials | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05282.05283 04/09/2009 Beth Williamson Jane Doe v. Us | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05288-05291 07/22/2009 | | | | | | +| William Berger Dr. Swan | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 05295-05297 | 07/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Priscilla Nascimento | RE: Epstein Conference Room Reserved | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05298 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Discussion of Epstein strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05261 | 07/23/2009 | Amy Swan | ██████████ | Victim Psychological Assessment | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18358-18359 | 07/24/2009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04431-04432 | 08/14/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ Edwards | RE: Epstein-Maxwell Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04419-04420 | 04/09/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | RICO Statement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04403-04416 | 10/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Punitive Damages | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04387-04402 | 08/19/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Victim Complaints, Forensic accountants, & Epstein's Fraudulent Transfers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01082 | 09/02/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Subpoenas for Epstein's Housekeepers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04363 | 09/14/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | LM | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04343-04344 | 09/04/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04340-04342 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04339 | 09/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] Edwards | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 00989 | 09/04/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | William Berger | Alessi Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04325-04328 | 07/30/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | RE: Epstein- beneficiaries & response to asset freeze motion | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 00155 | 06/25/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | 20 Cases & Bond | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04312-04313 | 05/26/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | RE: Epstein Accounting; Freezing | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Assets | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04314-04317 | 09/11/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | RE: Epstein- Add to our motion for a protective order * | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04307-04308 | 04/08/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Motion to stay-response & motion to unseal Fed Civil Case | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04309-04311 | 05/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Epstein Assets & Forensic Accounting | | +| 04295 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | thoughts on Epstein's Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04305-04306 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ Edwards | Motion to Strike references to the NPA & Revised response to the motion to stay | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04274-04276 | 05/06/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Sandy Berger Telephone call | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18334-18336 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | ██████████ | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04216-04219 | 09/08/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | State Judge ordered no contact with any underage girl | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing,S Fistos & Lehrman + +| 'ATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|--------| +| 04202-04206 09/08/2009 William Berger Epstein's attorneys & Bob | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective | | | | | | +| Order ., m | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04191.04193 09/04/2009 Paul Cassell William Berger Finding out who I rotected by | | | | | | +| not | | reasonably calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04194-04195 09/04/2009 Attorneys at MA Steven Jaffe Seek Court Intervention | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04196-04199 09/08/2009 William Berger Finding out who is protected by | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25937 10/25/2009 Scott Rothstein Ken Jenne [ ' | | | | | | +| ta -ribel | | | | | | +| Epstein's house staff | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys. RRA | | | | | | +| ' L | | | | | | +| Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | cakulated | to lead | to | the | +| 25832-25838 06/01/2009 William Berger contact Information re: who is | | | | | | +| | not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to the | +| 25825.25826 10/05/2009 I William Berger Trial Prep Epstein | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19649-19651 | 07/24/2009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19658-19661 | 08/03/3009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25809-25810 | 10/04/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Trail Prep | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04466-04469 | 08/18/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Epstein Assets Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01296 | 10/02/2009 | Mike Fisten | Michael Wheeler | Subpoena of Detective Recarey | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04439-0442 | 09/16/2009 | ██████████ Edwards | Paul Cassell | RE: Epstein-Notice Of IME | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04445 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | RE:Epstein Reminder-Mon 8/3/09-Monthly Call in Telephone Conference | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04425-04428 | 09/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Jane Doe Depo Set for the 30 th | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|-----| +| 04429 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Motion for Sanctions | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25770-25772 10/05/2009 William Berger Victims for Trial | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25768-25769 10/05/2009 William Berger Victims for Trail | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 26716-26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne | | | | | | +| < wk— | | | | | | +| NR as a victim | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 26714-26715 10/13/2009 Attorneys at RRA k | | | | | | +| Trial date procured | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 20907.20908 10/05/2009 | | | | | | +| William Berger Victims for Trial | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19857-19860 10/17/2009 Mike Fist | | | | | | +| Pat Epstein's Palm Beach Property | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19861-19862 10/23/2009 Paul Cassell Larry Visoski Depo | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|---------|----|-----| +| 19713-19715 09/09/2009 Jacquie Copperfield Subpoena W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19720-19729 09/30/2009 Mike Fisten Jacquie Tentative Subpoena dates and | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19706-19707 09/09/2009 Jacquie Dershowltz Subpoen act to be | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19693-19695 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Investigation Into Epstein's | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19696-19697 09/04/2009 Jacquie Edwar ting Up Depo Times W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19698-19700 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley Edwards Investigation in Epstein's planes W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19685.19688 08/27/2009 | | | | | | +| Ken Jenne RE: Witness information that we | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19689-19690 T privacy | | | | | | +| 09/02/2009 Mike Fisten Jacquie Awaiting dates for the 2 other | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19691-19692 | 09/02/2009 | Mike Fisten | Pat ██████ | Bill ██████ Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19673-19674 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Depo List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19654-19655 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ ██████ | Setting Up Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19656-19657 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ ██████ | List of people to subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19662-19663 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ Edwards | Setting Up Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19652-19653 | 08/26/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Witness information that we need to use | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18348-18349 | 08/27/2009 | ██████ ██████ | Ken Jenne | RE: Witnesses information that we need to use | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04272 | 06/30/2009 | William Berger | ██████ ██████ | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19683-19684 | 08/19/2009 | Mike Fisten | Pat ██████ | Potential New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|-----| +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 19856 10/17/2009 Mike listen Mike listen Investigation into Epstein's | | | | | | +| 414....., / | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 20888 09/12/2009 Adler Potential New witnessesli | | | | | | +| A\ 7 | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 20946 05/11/2009 Attorneys at RRA Investigation Epstein's | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 05807-05810 07/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Priscila | | | | | | +| R.0Conference room reserved | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05262-05263 07/22/2009 Jacquie Investigator information | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25829 05/11/2009 Edwards William Berger Motion to unseal criminal records | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25830-25831 05/11/2009 Attorneys at RRA Investigation into Epstein's | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 25811.25813 05/11/2009 Attorneys at RRA Investigation into Epstein's | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25815-25822 | 06/01/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Depo information | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18358-18359 | 07/24/2009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05382 | 09/12/2009 | ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Potential new witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08033-08070 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25997 | 10/23/2009 | Scott Rothstein | ██████████ Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley ██████████ | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25774-25777 | 05/12/2009 | ██████████ | Susan Stirling | Filed Motions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18177-18179 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | ██████████ | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 18174-18176 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Mike Fisten | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18172-18173 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18170 | 08/24/2009 | ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03106 | 06/03/3009 | ██████████ | Shawn Gilbert | Epstein Case Info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02593-02594 | 05/13/2009 | ██████████ | Shawn Gilbert | Discussion with secretary regarding client information | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08014 | Undated | Unknown Staff | ██████████ | Miscellaneous case info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 27494 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18166-18167 | 08/04/2009 | Bradley ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +=Jaffe. Weissing.Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 18164-18165 | 08/03/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18771-18773 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18742-18744 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Dershowitz Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18737-18741 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Depo technicalities | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 20263-20282 | 10/14/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] Mike Fisten | Ronald Wise | Vehicle Registrations-Visoski | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 20219-20262 | 10/14/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] Mike Fisten | Ronald Wise | Visoski Research & Questions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 17225-17230 | 07/22/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Wayne Black Retainer | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 17038-17040 | 10/29/2009 | Cara [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | RE: Subpoenas for Epstein's attorneys | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 16916-16928 | 10/19/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Witness List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|---------|------|--------|-----| +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 16795-16796 10/01/2009 Jacquie Trump Depo W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 16455-16759 09.10/2009 Jacqule Depo Dates W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 16436-16437 09/09/2009 Jacqule Dershowitz Depo | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 16400-16404 09/02/2009 Mike Fisten Jacqule n Igation into Epstein's W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| fl pla | | | | | | | +| 16394.16395 08/31/2009 Jacquie Depo Dates W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not reasonably | | calculated | to | lead | to the | | +| 01046 08/25/2009 Cara | | | | | | | +| f ill | | | | | | | +| Computer information W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| privacy rights rigt.0 \ | | | | | | | +| 01048-01050 07/28/2010 William Berger Hard drive of Plaintiff's computer W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to | the | +| 01052 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal Opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01100 | 10/19/2009 | Adler | Adler | Dershowitz Involvement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01105 | 08/11/2009 | Adler | Alan Garten | Potential New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01111 | 05/13/2009 | Adler | Paul Cassell | Legal research | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01112-01117 | 05/12/2009 | Adler | William Berger | Dr. Swan | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01139-01142 | 04/29/2009 | Staff | Edwards | Epstein Depo revised | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01151 | 09/11/2009 | Beth Williamson | Beth Williamson | Motion for protective order final draft | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01167 | 09/11/2009 | Adler | Jacquie | Epstein MPO | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01216 | 05/21/2009 | Adler | William Berger | Immunity for testimony about prostitution | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jane, weissing. 1-istos & Lenrman + +| | | o | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01247 | 09/30/2009 | | Jacqule | Therapy Notes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01268-01269 | 10/22/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Epstein meeting | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01293 | 08/19/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Epstein AssetsV | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01299 | 04/21/2009 | | Carolyn | Order denying the motion to | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01305 | 08/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | Edwards | Epill Computers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01313 | 09/02/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacquie | Epstein Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01333 | 08/03/3009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01335 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigation into Epstein planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|--------| +| 01337 08/10/2009 Jacquie Epstein Depo list | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01363 09/08/2009 Ken Jenne Motion to freeze assets | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01414.01416 98/18/2009 Mike Fisten Epstein Potential Witness Ust | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01417 08/24/2009 Mike Fisten Poten AS* ' | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 01429 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Edwards Epstein telephone conference | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01431 07/31/2009 Jacquie Epstein case info | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 01432 09/15/2009 | | | | | | +| Pat New Victims | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01434 10/19/2009 | | | | | | +| kaiak urik Epstein Evidence | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to the | +| 01461 04/27/2009 Marc Nurik I Epstein Info | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | + +1. + +## Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------|--------| +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01466 07/31/20009 William Berger Epstein Presentation | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01471 07/18/2009 Wayne Black MI Investigation Into Epstein's | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01480 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Epstein Mn\ | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01482 07/24/2009 Ken Jenne investigation Into Epstein planes | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01491 08/10/2009 Ken Jenne Investigative fees | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01492 08/10/2009 Jacqule Johnson | | | | | | +| IL iiiise | | | | | | +| Bradley The Mar-a-Lago Club Depo | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01495 08/11/2009 Marc Nuri Potential Witness | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 01498 08/17/2009 Marc Nurik Legal opinion re:Epstein | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| | not | reasonably | calculated to | lead | to the | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01502 | 08/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | ██████████ | Epstein Evidence | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01513 | 08/25/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | Discovery for the girls | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01522 | 08/14/2009 | ██████████ | Marc Nurik | Legal opinion | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01522 | 10/08/2009 | Ken Jenne | ██████████ | New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01523-01524 | 10/26/2009 | Marc Nurik | ██████████ | Meeting on Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01527 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | ██████████ | New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01540 | 05/01/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy on punitive damages | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01553 | 09/10/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie Johnson | Letter from JP ██████████ Chase | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 01566 | 05/11/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01586 | 05/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Opposition to the continuance of the trial date | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15690-15691 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | Trump Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01607 | 10/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy on motions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01621 | 04/19/2009 | Marc Nurik | ██████████ Edwards | Potential New Witness | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01622 | 06/09/2009 | Susan Stirling | ██████████ | Important phone call due today | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01624 | 06/11/2009 | Robert Buschel | ██████████ | Motion for bond asset transfer | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01627 | 05/06/2009 | Bradley ██████████ | Marc Nurik | Dateline interest into epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01628 | 06/15/2009 | Robert Buschel | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Investigations | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01635 | 05/21/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn [REDACTED] | Personal Conversation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01636 | 06/23/2009 | Susan Stirling | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Motion to unseal | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01638 | 06/29/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy RE: Motion to unseal | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01644 | 07/06/2009 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] Edwards | Request for admission | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01646 | 07/06/2009 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Secret Plea deal for Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01648 | 07/11/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Investigating Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01650 | 07/13/2009 | Carl Linder | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein's Assets | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01658-01659 | 07/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | DOJ | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +#### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|----|--------| +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 01663 07/18/2009 Mike Fisten Epstein's cars | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | | to lead | to | the | +| 01668 07/29/2009 Wayne Black number | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 01764 07/31/2009 Carolyn Case Numbed & | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 01676 10/17/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| MSili/ISC5' P | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | | to lead | to | the | +| 01681 08/03/20009 Mike Fisten Positing regarding litigation | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 01682 09/04/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy-Order 242 | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead | to | the | +| 09/11/2009 Plaintiff firms the notices of | | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | | to lead | to | the | +| 01686 09/11/2009 Mike Fisten Potential new witnesses | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | | +| | not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | | to the | + +## Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | Dg | 12 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------|-------------|------------------|---------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01692 | 09/12/2009 | William Berger | | Proposal for settlement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01698 | 05/05/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein Victim Depos | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01702 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01705 | 05/14/2009 | William Berger | | Statutory Rape | | +| | | | | t x | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| | | | Q | 34/ v | privacy rights | +| 01711 | 04//01/2009 | Carolyn | ands | Third party subs | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01737 | 07/14/2009 | Richard Wolfe | | | | +| | | | dley | Facebook/Myspece | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01564 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Investigation Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01603 | 10/15/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Testimony RE: Vehicles | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 01742 | 10/12/2009 | Beth Williamson | ██████████ | Filing fee check | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01743 | 10/29/2009 | Beth Williamson & Jacquie | ██████████ | New folder for Jane Doe Created | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01745 | 10/15/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Epstein's Cars | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05726 | 08/14/2009 | ██████████ | William Berger | Legal opinion | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 27395 | 08/13/2009 | Marc Nurik | Scott Rothstein | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26356 | 08/13/2009 | Scott Rothstein | ██████████ Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04225 | 06/15/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Epstein Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04229-04233 | 06/16/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Epstein secret plea deal with Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|---------|-----| +| 04237-04242 06/15/2009 Wayne Black Epstein secret plea deal with | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04246 06/15/2009 Wayne Black Epstein secret plea deal for Bspria | | | | | | +| Stearns C / | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 04250 06/15/2009 Wayne Black Epstein Victims \ | | | | | | +| -k/No ' | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04255.04256 06/15/2009 Wayne Black Epstein secret plea deal for Bear | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to | lead to | the | +| 04260 06/15/2009 Wayne Black | | | | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 04523 05/14/2009 Wa WC ' | | | | | | +| Investigating Epstein's planes | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05088-05090 10/27/2009 Attorneys at RRA | | | | | | +| Ils r. | | | | | | +| Ken Jenne Epstein's assets | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | +| 05108 04/01/2009 , , Carolyn Victims employment | | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | | | +| not | reasonably | calculated | to lead | to | the | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 05145 05/21/2009 Carolyn Epstein Hearing | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 05237 07/20/2009 Wayne Black Investigating Epstein's planes | | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 02648-02650 08/10/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02651 07/29/2009 Wayne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02661-02662 05/12/2009 _Adler Edwards Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02674-02677 08/18/2009 Jacquie Bradley Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 'not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02678-02679 04/10/2009 AtK | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02682.02683 08/10/2009 a Ja Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02718-02720 06/25/2009 I Seth Lehman Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +| ME DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02728-O2729 08/04/20O9 Spencer Kuvin Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated | to lead to the | +| 02746 07/22/20O9 Adam Steinberg Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02813-02814 08/26/2009 Pate Providing New Witnesses | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02817-O2826 08/O4/2009 l'ir William Berger | | +| tt ation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02827-O2832 05/12/20O9 Attorneys at RRA Willianill | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02833-02835 08/23/2O09 Edwards Pat Diaz Other Rape Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02874-02876 05/23/20O9 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02887-02888 08/26/2009 Pat ■ Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +M , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos &Lehrman + +| pATE TO FRO 11, DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 02889-02890 10/14/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02891 10/12/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02892 08/03/2009 William Berger Litigation Str ,..,, | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02894 09/09/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | | +| 02899 09/29/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03001-03002 05/15/2009 Susan Stirling | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03003 04/15/2009 Paul ,Ca | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03004 06/23/2009 Wayne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03005-03006 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03007 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03008 04/23/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | | +| .."S liC, | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03013 05/25/2009 c lic* egy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03014 10/08/2009 Cara HoImp., | | +| Mgation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03017-03018 08/18/2009 Mike Fisten Providing New witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03019 09/19/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | w/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03020 09/16/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03021-03027 09/19/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03031-03034 09/18/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03035 09/29/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy | | +| iC \\/ | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03039 06/05/2009 Paul Cassell | | +| Act- i I III | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03040 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Will Be er | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03044 09/09/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03045-03047 09/30/2009 Bradle&y man Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03048 04/21/2009 Paul Cassell Susan Stirling Litiation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +| DATE M FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03050-03052 10/16/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03053 10/17/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03054 10/13/2009 Attorneys at RRA Grant Litigation Strategy | | +| AS S C" Ilfri | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03056 09/04/20O9 Mike Fisten | | +| S L | | +| DtltlLRape Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated | to lead to the | +| 03072 06/22/2009 Wayne Black if Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03073 09/01/2009 Edwards Mike Fisten litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03074-03075 10/28/2009 Jacquie Michael Wheeler Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03100 10/15/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +Jane, weissing, ristos a tenrman + +| DALE 12 DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| '03102-03103 07/21/2009 Paul Cassell Other Rape Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03107-03113 07/24/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | +| CI ,, | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03114 08/04/2009 Mike Fisten litigation St | | +| 4.(i t. | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03115-03118 05/16/2009 Susan Stirling Utkatiatt Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03124 06/23/2009 Wayne | | +| tigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03125 09/08/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03127-03128 05/19/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03135-03136 08/04/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +| Nag TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03137 08/22/2009 Wayne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03138 10/08/2009 Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03145 10/30/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | | +| A. X.: ' k ) | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03146 08/22/2009 Wayne Black Litigotc% S | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03147-03154 10/07/2009 Beth Williamson gation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03155-03155 10/08/2009 Jacqule Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03158-3159 04/28/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03191-03196 10/14/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +Jane, weissing, ristos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03197-03199 08/14/2009 Attorneys at RRA Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03205-03211 09/13/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03212 08/11/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy i. | | +| AN 1:1) | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03213 10/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03214-03218 10/27/2009 Paul Cassell Ronald Wise | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03223-03232 04/15/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03233.03242 09/28/2009 IRE Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03245 06/01/2009 I rger Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03251-03252 09/24/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing,a, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE IQ FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03303 07/30/2009 Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03306-03307 09/04/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03308-03309 09/04/2009 Beth Williamson Litigationit@ | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| discove ry | of admissible evidence; protected by | +| 03310-03314 09/04/2009 Paul Cassell trategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03389 07/30/2009 Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03392-03393 09/04/2009 et illtamson Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| williamso p, 4(4\., | | +| 03461-03463 09/19/2009 I Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03464-03465 06/14/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION 1 OBJECTION | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03469-03486 06/15/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03495 08/27/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03496-03501 10/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03502-03506 10/27/2009 Paul Cassell Ronald Wise Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03507.03510 10/28/2009 Paul Cassell | | +| LE.0) , | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03511-03513 10/28/2009 rid wise litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03514-03516 10/26/2009 Paul Cassell Ronald Wise Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03520.03523 07/04/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +| DATE 1.g FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03524 09/04/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 09/05/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03532 08/24/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03536 07/19/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation egy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03539-03540 08/26/2009 Pat Providing New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03541-03544 10/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ronald Wise Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03545-03547 06/26/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03548-03549 04/11/2009 Wayne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +| pmg m mom DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Providing New Witnesses i C | | +| | reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 03589-03604 04/11/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy _ | | +| S ) | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03605-03606 10/16/2009 Attorneys at RRA Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03607-03610 10/16/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03611-03612 10/16/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03613-03615 10/29/2009 Edwards Cara Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03616-03618 10/01/2009 Pat Diaz Providing New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03628.03637 09/15/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +M, Jaffe, Welssing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|--------------|------------|-----------------------|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03638-03641 | 09/08/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08454 | 10/23/2010 | Attorneys at RRA | Mark Fistos | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08118-08123 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] Adler | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08124-08156 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02411-02413 | 05/12/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley Edwards | J. Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Work product; attorney/client privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01913-01914 | 06/15/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | [REDACTED] | J. Activity in case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Doe v. Epstein Motion to Dismiss | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01918- 01919 | 04/15/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] | J. Activity In case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Doe v. Epstein Motion to Compel | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01920-01924 | 05/20/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | J. Activity in case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | + +M , Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | 12 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------|---------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------|------------| +| | | | | Motion to Strike | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; | | +| 01925 | 08/26/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Adriana Surveillance/Interview | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01928-01929 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Alfredo Rodriguez address | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01930 | 09/05/2009 | J. | William 1. Berger | Client Info | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01940 | 09/10/2009 | Adler | J. | Witness info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01944-01952 | 04/10/2009 | Adler | J. | Epstein assets | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01969 | 05/04/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | | | | | | | +| | | | J. | Call from sources of information | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01971-01972 | 05/13/2009 | Atttnt | | | | | | | +| | | | J. | Cassell Draft | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01973.01974 | 07/23/2009 | Mike Fisten | J. | CMA vs. | Epstein — new | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|----|--------------|-----|---------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 01975 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | | | J. | Computers | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01976-01978 | 07/06/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | | Conference Call | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01981-01982 | 04/01/2009 | | J. | Adler | | Conflict check | gil. Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | | ) cN | | | | | +| 01990 | 05/14/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | | Consolidation order | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | 09/03/2009 | Jacquiealr | | ,' | n3. | | | | | | +| | | | | Edwards s i | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02001-02003 | 10/09/2009 | Jacquie | | | 1. | David Copperfield | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02009-2010 | 09/09/2009 | Pasquale | | | J. | Deposition of Bill | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02017-02018 | 05/18/2009 | William J. Berger | | | J. | Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | PATE | 12 | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | BJECTI N | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------------------|---------|----|------------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02023 | 05/14/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | J. | Sid's deposition of Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02045-02046 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein —Letter. | | | | | +| | | | | | from Bob Critton 1 | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02049-02053 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter | | | | | +| | | | | | 4 /%4E) Y | | | | | +| | | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02063-02064 | 05/19/2009 | William J. Berger | | J. | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial in | | | | | +| | | | | | Telephone Conference for | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02089-02090 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Epstein hearing | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02091-02092 | 06/16/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley | J. | | | | | | +| | | | | | Epstein — Monthly Call in | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02106-02108 | 04/29/2009 | Susan K. Stirling •( --,, s? | | | | irrelevant | | | | +| | | | | J. | Epstein —Telephone Conference | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02109 | 05/13/2009 | W ack | | J. | Epstein info — List of Plaintiff | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02110-02111 | 09/15/2009 | J. | Jacquie | | Epstein - Cancelling depositions | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing. , Fistos &Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|---------|----|-------------------------------|----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02112-02116 | 09/10/2009 | J. | Jacquie | | Epstein — Yearbook picture of | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02117.02118 | 10/23/2009 | Jacquie | | J. | Epstein (AUSA) | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02119-02121 | 09/08/2009 | Beth S. | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | J. | Epstein I \ | | | | | | +| | | | | | ^N th, | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02130-02137 | 05/26/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | | J. | Epstein cases- depositions | in | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02138-02139 | 08/04/2009 | Jacquie | | J. | Epstein depo — New York | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02143.02146 | 09/28/2009 | Jacquie | | J. | Epstein Depo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02229 | 05/05/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Epstein Depo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02236-02337 | 05/20/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | J. | Epstein info | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M" Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | 12 | | FROM | | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----|-------------|------|-----|---------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02256-02257 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie | | | | .1, | Epstein Info | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02260-02261 | 07/22/2009 | Nora Batian | | | | J. | Epstein — coordinating meetings | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02263-02265 | 07/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Nora Batian | | | Epstein info | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Ace se | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02266 | 07/30/2009 | Jacquie | | | | J. | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | E ein eo Deposition of S.K. | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02273-02276 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | | | | J. | Epstein Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | Edw | s | | | | | | | +| 02278.02279 | 07/23/2009 | Prisci la | A. | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | tian | | Epstein info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02284-02855 | 05/11/2009 | Susan K. Stirll | | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | J. | Epstein info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01769 | 10/30/2009 | Mike Fisten | | | | J. | Barbara Berg info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | PATE | i | | | | | | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----|-------------------|----|-----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | i TO | | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +| 01780 | 09/14/2009 | | J. | William J. Berger | | Discussion of belief that Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01787-01788 | 09/04/2009 | Ken Jenne | | | J. | 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME | | | | | +| | | | | | | a( 1 | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01799-01801 | 10/14/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | | Activity in case 9:08-cv40119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01804-01805 | 09/04/2009 | Beth | S. | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01806-01807 | 09/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | J. | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01808-01809 | 09/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | J. | Activity In case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01810.01816 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys at IRA | | | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01817.01818 | 06/11/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +ME, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| 13AT ES | DATE | is≥ | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----|---------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 01840-01841 | 07/16/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01867.01868 | 09/28/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03662-03663 | 08/10/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | J. | Meeting with clients | | | | | +| | | | | | AC'iNe) >1 | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03664-03668 | 09/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Litigation strategy and | | | | | +| | | | | | pr ratlon | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08166-08168 | 10/28/2009 | Paul Cassell | | J. | Weds filing | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08169-08170 | 08/06/2009 | 1. | Jacquie Johnson | | Wexner deposition for 14th | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08190-08196 | 04/07/2009 | J. | Paul Cassell | | Motion to unseal/Motion to stay | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08265-08300 | 09/04/2009 | ttorneys at RRA | | J. | Witness Information | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08377-08378 | 10/02/2009 | J. | Paul Cassell | | Zorro Trust research info. | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | T_O | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|---------|----|------------------|-----------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08381-08383 | 09/06/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | Epstein —complaint | | | | | +| | | | | | ("4" I | tto | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08384-08388 | 04/13/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | Epstein fraudulent transfer | 0 | | | | +| | | | | | t ASP remo | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08389-08397 | 05/14/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | Revisited sex | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08401 | 07/22/2009 | | J. | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | | | Re enio on asset transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08409-08410 | 08/01/2009 | | J. | Cara I...Ili\ | Rodriguez Deposition | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08421 | 06/02/2009 | | J. | William). Berger | Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08423-08425 | 10/09/2009 | Bradley | | | | | | | | +| | | | J. | Mike Fisten | Subpoena info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08426 | 08/10/2009 | | J. | Mike Fisten | Synopsis | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | M | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTIOIS, | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------|-------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08441-08446 | 10/05/2009 | | | | | | | | +| | | Attorneys at RICA | William J. Berger | Trial Prep | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03672-03673 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | | Brunel Information IL | | | | | +| | | | | "Ihsi i | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03706.03718 | 08/05/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Cf. Response to Motion to File | | | | | +| | | | | A l | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03737 | 08/25/2009 | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03746.03753 | 08/02/2009 | | William Berger | | | | | | +| | | | | puters | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02335-02338 | 05/08/2009 | William Berger | | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02360-02361 | 06/09/2009 | Sus St | | Hearing to Un-seal- Criminal Plea | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02368-02373 | 10/14/2009 | | Jacquie | Igor Zinoview depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | PATE | TO f)301%6 | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|--------------|--------------|------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | 10/14/2009 | Mike Fisten | Igor Zinoview depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02401-02410 | 05/08/2009 | William Berger | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02414-02419 | 05/12/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jane Doe II v. Epp | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03669-0 3670 | 10/08 /2 009 | Carolyn | Eps o arrest monitor | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02288-02289 | 05/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Ed rd , :i • date | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02292-02293 | 05/19/2009 | Dr. | Pimp and His Game | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02304-02308 | 09/17/2009 | Bradley Edwa , . | | | | | | +| | | | Jacqule Forensics/Investigations | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02313.02316 | 07/01/2009 | | William Berger Confidential Agreement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| ME | PATE | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|-------------------------------|----------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02331-02334 | 05/08/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Critton order Transcript | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02173 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Juan Alessi | i | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02187 | 07/26/2009 | | Wayne Black | Epstein matter 0 | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02195-02197 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Order | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02199-02203 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Order | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02211-02214 | 07/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | Edwards | Epstein v. State of | Florida | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02224 | 07/28/2009 | Jacquie | | Witness of Epstein rapes from | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10787.10799 | 10/19/2009 | Bradley | Jacquie | Witness List | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10901-10902 | 05/11/2009 | | William Berger | RICO Enterprise | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | LQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|-------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 10904-10905 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10908-10909 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10912-10913 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Ent ilse | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 1O955-10963 | 06/01/2009 | | William Berger | | | | | | +| | | | AlS | eaf | | | | | +| | | | | la Ws fitness List | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10979-10981 | 06/03/20O9 | | Wayn&Blac | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11022-11025 | 06/26/2009 | Edwards | ?altAe Black | Info on 2 MC2 Workers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | .1%. ?S' ' | | protected by privacy rights r | | | | | +| 11036-11037 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11039-11071 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Retainer from the Firm | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +MIN Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------|--------------------------------|---|-------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 11083-11084 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness info | | | | | | | +| | | | | | r | 14/ | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11105-11110 | O9/09/2009 | Jacquie | | Disseminate letter from Wexner | | | | | | | +| | | | | attorney | | --"'" | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11137-11139 | 10/03/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Zorro Trust research info | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11143-11146 | 10/04/2009 | William Berger | | 11/28 Discovery Cutoff | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11155-11156 | 10/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | New Property | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11175-11183 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | Bradley | Epstein Case info | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11196-11197 | 05/28/2009 | | | | | | | | | | +| | | Alkar ‘pb.b.) | | | | | | | | | +| | | Susa Stirling | | Jail Visitors | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11205.11207 | 05/28/2009 | Piul Cassell | | Litigation strategy | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +a, Jane. weissunt. ristos ut Lenrman + +| | wig | 12 FROM | DESCRIPTION | O13JECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|---------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 11215 | 06/01/2009 | William Berger | Activity in Case | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11238-11239 | 06/03/2009 | Wayne Black | Depo Info | r Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11246-11247 | 06/22/2009 | Wayne Black | Epstein Articletc | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 11251-11254 | 06/23/2009 | Wayne Black | info on 2 k2\MIC) | | | | | +| | | | workers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11267-11268 | 06/30/2009 | William Berger | Witness Ust revised | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11282-11315 | 07/18/2009 | Wayne Black | Confidential Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11326.11331 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Donald Trump depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11337-11339 | 08/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | Confidential Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | 19 FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 11359.11362 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | Epstein depos | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11366-11371 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Trump depo info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11377-11379 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Issuing Subpoenas _ | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11390-11395 | 08/17/2009 | Jacquie | Witness depoSstSi | | | | | +| | | | N7 | to | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11400-11415 | 08/18/2009 | Jacquie | Subpoenas for pilots | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11420-11426 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley= Serving Alan Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11428-11429 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at | | | | | | +| | | RRA | Witness info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11568 | 10/07/2009 | Patina sell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11587 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Visoski Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|------------| +| 11861-11865 10/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Witness List | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11870-11871 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Epstein Info | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11874 08/24/2009 Jacquie Confidential into iy) | | | | +| y | irrelevant | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11876 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Confident al Info Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11967.11972 10/29/2009 Cara Jacquie Subpoenas for Epstein's | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08072-08075 07/22/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | +| Total counts for E.W. Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08090-08091 10/05/2009 William ) Be er Trial Prep Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08114-08117 08/18/2009 Pat Updated Witness List | | | | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | M | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|------------------------------|----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08157-08159 | 06/03/2009 | | | Vanity Fair | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08499-08501 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness List L | es | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10063-10068 | 08/03/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Confidential Info ") | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10090-10091 | 08/31/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacquie | Witness Info | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10103.10104 | 08/27/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Witness Info | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10106-10137 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | | | | | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne | Meetings/ Confidential Info | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 12569 | 07/30/2009 | cane < | | | | | | | | +| | | | | Epstein Sex Abuse Litigation | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15827-15837 | 07/22/2009 | Jaequle | | Retainer for investigator | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M , Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | pATE | ig | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 15820-15822 | 10/29/2009 | Jacquie | Cara | Subpoenas for | Epsteln's | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15401-15412 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | | Disseminate the letter | from | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15356-15359 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness info | | | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 14934-14950 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie | | investifcyifo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 13413-13414 | 08/06/2009 | Denis Kleinfeld | | Epstein Information | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 13908.13911 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Meeting info | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10595-10597 | 09/29/2009 | | Jacquie | Subpoena for | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10621-10624 | 10/02/2009 | sik(arilly | Jacquie | Meeting with Wexner atty | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +a t Jaffe, Weissing,la Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESC IPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------------------|------------------------|-------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 10633-10638 | 10/05/2009 | William Berger | Trial Prep | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10681-10692 | 10/07/2009 | Jacquie Mike Fisten | Depositions | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10777-10786 | 10/16/2009 | Paul Cassell | New Evidence | of Epstein | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04094-04100 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02915 | 10/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA Mike Fisten | | | | | | +| | | | , AC 2 k 1 | | | | | +| | | | Finances | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02971 | 10/14/2009 | Jacquie Bradley | Larry Visoskl depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02976 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | Disseminate the | letter from | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02995 | 06/24/20O9 | Bradley | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10172-10178 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Trump Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 10193 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Trump Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10255 | 09/09/2009 | William Berger | Depo of Alan Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10259-10263 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys of RRA Jacquie | Cooperfiel Se ice | | | | | +| | | | 6 \ | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03876-03877 | 10/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | 4(it itil.' | | | | | +| | | | tgation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03879-03884 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03886-03891 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03905-03920 | 09/08/2009 | will er | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03937 | 08/17/2009 | Carolyn | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +I= Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04005-04011 | 05/13/2009 | William Berger | Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04070-04093 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03754 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Conference Call | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03848-03858 | 09/09/2009 | Jacqule | Cooperfield Service | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03642-03643 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | Edwards . Accounts/ 2. Motion for IME | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03657.03661 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02475 | 06/15/2009 | Susan Stirling | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02494.02515 | 09/20/2009 | Pat | Mark Epstein Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +IMM, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | PATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--------------|--------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02520-02543 | 06/06/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Memo of Assest Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02548-02553 | 08/03/2009 | Beth Williamson | | Federal Subpoena | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02560-02565 | 07/31/2009 | | Jacquie | Federal Subpoena | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02568-02570 | 10/13/2009 | Jacquie | | New N | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02578-02583 | 05/28/2009 | Paul Cassell | Ed S | illation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02619-02622 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | | | | | | | +| | | | = c o l | | | | | | +| | | | | New client Retainer | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02633-02646 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cas I | | | | | | | +| | | | | Response to Motion | to | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07959-07964 | 09/24/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 07967.07975 09/22/2009 Jacquie Mike Fisten Subpoena on Epstein case Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07979-08000 08/18/2009 Jacquie Subpoenas for Pilots Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07735-07736 07/24/2009 Jacquie Releases for therapist | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07643-07645 09/09/2009 Jacquie New client Retainer Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07698-07706 09/06/2009 Paul Cassell Edwards Answer to the Complaint Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 4. li r | protected by privacy rights | | | +| 07620-07632 08/14/2009 Jacqule Brad Review of "Notice of Taking Depo | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07635-07636 10/15/2009 Mike Fist r\ Questions from forensic | | | | +| accountant detecting Epstein | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07617-07618 07/13/2009 Paul Ca a Epstein strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07550-07589 10/30/2009 I Paul Cassell Motion to Supplement with the Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Visoski depo | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | | +| 07595.07604 05/20/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07616 07/22/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy --s- ° | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07530-07549 06/11/2009 Susan Stirling Overtime | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07470.07507 07/09/2009 Paul Cassell M n t Compel Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07447.07469 10/13/2009 Attorneys at RRA Adle New Times Article on epstein Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07444-07446 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Response to Motion to | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07440 10/18/2009 Attorneys at RRA New Trump Property Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07436 04/11/2009 Adler New cases Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | Rea L ai | jg OM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|----------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 07424-07431 | 09/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | Need Depo Transcript | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07412-07423 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07403-07411 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07394-07402 | 07/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | A tt e | | | | | +| | | | Itiple 2255 Counts | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07386.07392 | 05/28/2009 | William Berger | Ertafocs; Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | C....) | | protected by privacy rights | | | +| 07378.07385 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07370-07377 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07354-07369 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | Motion to Protect 2nd | depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07346 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | | Motion to protect 2"d depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07337 | 10/28/2009 | | Jacquie | Motion to protect 2 | | | | | +| | | | | nis depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07328 | 10/28/2009 | | Beth Williamson | Motion to protect 2nd depo | | | | | +| | | | | S I%(,) | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07319 | 10/28/2009 | | Jacqule | Moitlift#otect 2" depo | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07313-07318 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion to Compel — Photograph | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07287-07301 | 07/08/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion to Compel — File this | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07252-07278 | 09/08/2009 | Bradley Edwards | Paul Cassell | Motion for IME + Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07247-07251 | 09/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for IME + Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M r Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | M | ROM | DESCRIPTION{ | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|--------------|--------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07230.07233 | 06/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Memo on Asset Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07157-07158 | 09/29/2009 | Adler | = | RE: Mark | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07128-07141 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for bond t nsfer | | | | | +| | | | | and memo final Ac t | | | | | +| | | | | 4 ) | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07094.07098 | 09/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Letter to Critton RE: Motions to | | | | | +| | | | | X ‘4SP | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07025-07027 | 10/29/2009 | | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | | 4M. and E.W. v. Epstein — | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07099-07106 | 09/14/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Letter to Critton RE: Motions to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07071-07078 | 07/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | | L.M.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07066-07070 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | L.M.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07015-07016 | 10/13/2009 | I | Paul Cassell | Evidence of Asset transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| PATES DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|------------| +| and/or liquidations | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | | +| 07019-07024 10/29/2009 Paul Cassell L.M. and E.W. v. Epstein — I'm on | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06837.06839 04/08/2009 Beth Williamson Jane Doe change of address -"el Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06826-06836 04/08/2009 Beth Williamson Jane Doe change of address | | | | +| A‘ AS ( 'ilir | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06823-06825 04/08/2009 Beth Williamson | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06813-06816 07/02/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Doe v. Epstein Motion for | | | | +| Extension of Time to File | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06808-06810 09/13/2009 Paul Cassell "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06804-06805 09/13/2009 Paul Cassell "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06794 10/23/2009 Mike Fisten Interesting Web Site Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------|----------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06800-06803 | 09/06/2009 | Paul Cassell | | RE: 1. Accountants 2. Motion for | | | | | | +| 06761-06762 | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | IME Rules | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06767-06769 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | IME's | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06782-06787 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Confidential Detailed | Strategy | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06744-06747 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley Edwards | Depo of Jeffrey Epstein | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06736.06739 | 05/01/2009 | Edwards | Paul Cassell | Asset Protection Issue | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06709-06710 | 10/14/2009 | Y | | | | | | | | +| | | | Mike Fisten | Igor Zinoview depo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | 11 0 FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|--------------|-----------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06691-06696 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | How many 2255 claims? | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06683-06686 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Hiding Assets | | | | | +| | | | | Ci Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06654 | 07/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | SecretaryContact | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06599-06600 | 07/08/20O9 | Paul Cassell | Hiding AssetsS | ) | | | | +| | | | " N oy | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06574.06590 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06567-06570 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06558-06561 | 07/09/2009 | Paul II | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissing. aF nan + +| | PATE | | FROM | DEScRIPTION | | OBJECTIO N | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|--------------|------------------------|-----------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06554-06557 | 05/14/2009 | | | | | | | | | +| | | ji mm | | | | | | | | +| | | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06549-06553 | 05/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06540-06541 | 09/21/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Info on Maxwell | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06537 | 10/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Doe isescfrti4,Epstein | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06529.06530 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Ed | | | | | | | +| | | | | v. Epstein | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06496-06505 | 10/20/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Visoski depo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06177-06181 | 09/25/2009 | William Berger | | | | | | | | +| | | | | Financial discovery | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06149-06153 | 07/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Federal First | Amendment | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06118-06146 | 09/15/2009 | Seth Lehrman | | Farnsworth v. Macys case | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06113-06117 | 07/14/2009 | | Richard Wolfe | Facebook/Myspace | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06106.06112 | 05/19/2009 | Amy Swan | William Berger | Expert Witness | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06091 | 08/04/2009 | William Berger | Paul Cassell | EW and LM v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06001.06011 | 07/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein's Address and Position of | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05996 | 04/08/2009 | | Beth Williamson | Litigation Strategy | | | | | +| 05998-06000 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05992 | 04/19/2009 | I | Marc Nurik | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | an | 1g | FROM | pESCRIPTION | | OW 1 | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|----------------------------|---|------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05968 | 10/17/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| | | | | | / | 14to | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05944.05947 | 05/01/2009 | William Berger | | litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05927 | 09/18/2009 | | Amy Swan | Ryan Half Psychratrist | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05931-05932 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | ' | Client's Cell Phone Number | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05919-05920 | 07/28/2009 | | Amy Q2...) | Client's Cell Phone Number | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05915 | 04/22/2009 | Bradley y | Marc Nurlk | Litigation Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05911 | 05/28/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | pESCRIRTiON | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------------------|------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05890 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05893-05894 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05898-05899 | 07/28/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy -Iiii4 | | | | | +| | | | \ | S(2 | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05885 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie | Lltig n tegy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05874-05879 | 07/23/2009 | Jacquie | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05868 | 08/03/2009 | Ken Jenne | Epstein Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05865 | 09/10/2009 | Bra y E ards | | | | | | +| | c | um,, | | | | | | +| | | Jacquie | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05860-05861 | 09/10/2009 | Maribel Matiska | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | on IQ | FROM | PESCRiPTION | | OBJECTION, | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|--------------------|------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05845 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Plane Tall Numbers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05811 | 06/09/2009 | Susan Stirling | Witness Numbers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05813 | 08/15/2009 | Ken Jenne | Litigation | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05748-05749 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | iitclatrategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | ‘ asi | | protected by privacy rights | | | +| 05711 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Subpoena Clinton | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05701-05704 | 04/20/2009 | Edwards Russell Adler | Epstein strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05687 | 08/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | Alfredo Rodriguez | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05690-05691 | 05/11/2009 | ME Susan Stirling | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| DATE To FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05680-05682 05/11/2009 William Berger Subpoena Clinton Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05676 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Mike Fisten Topics for Meeting | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05648 07/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Gary Assem Epstein Litigation | | | | +| i t | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/cllent | privilege; | +| 05629 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Law Enforcement cannot release | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | protected by privacy rights | | i | +| 05621.05622 09/18/2009 Amy Swan Bradley Preparing Motion to take an IME | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05610.05612 04/27/2009 Susan Stir | | | | +| Request for Copies Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05588-05590 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Travel restrictions Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | PATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|---------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05575-05576 | 08/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Alfredo Rodriguez | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05582 | 09/11/2009 | | Mike Flsten | Epstein strategy | 4 | | | | +| | | | | | C 1 | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05569.05570 | 08/17/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Legal Opinion c | | | | | +| | | | | \ 4144C)) | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05556-05558 | 08/14/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Communication with legal expert | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05537 | 07/30/2009 | Jacquie | E ar s | No objections from | defense | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05534 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Flight logs for Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05518 | 07/22/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Assemble Epstein | Litigation | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05512.05513 | 07/23/2009 | Priscila | | | | | | | +| | | | Nora Batian | Assemble Epstein | Litigation | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05502-05507 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Wayne Black's email | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05475 | 04/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Call with Chris Hanson from dateline | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05471-05472 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Legal expert regarding legal issue | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05447 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Communication with legal expert | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05420-05423 | 05/20/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Research on cases saying a judge can postpone one party's depo until the other is completed | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05409-05412 | 08/17/2009 | [REDACTED] Edwards | Marc Nurik | Legal opinion regarding discovery | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05403-05405 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Jeffrey Epstein Wikipedia page | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | DATE | O | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|-------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | | Proposal for settlement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | | Proposal for settlement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05271.05272 | 07/22/2009 | | Jacquie | Depo Dates to take SR, MI, and | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05259-05260 | 07/22/2009 | | Jacqule | Investigator retainer | | | | | +| | | | | fs silic : | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05238 | 07/ 14/2009 | | William Berger | | | | | | +| | | | | +le' a request to produce | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05240-05241 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Kent | Judge's order on the Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05197-05199 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys art | | | | | | | +| | | N O | | | | | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne | Michael Reiter info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 0515505156 | 04/20/2009 | Adler | Ila | Set Epstein's depo duces tecum | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05159-05160 | 05/28/2009 | William Berger | | Right to move to reconsider all | | | | | +| | | | | rulings % o | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05149-05150 | 05/27/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Epstein filed a 14/ n to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05153 | 08/24/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Epstein traveling | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05146.05147 | 05/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | Edwards | The response to the motion to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05137-05144 | 05/20/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Russell Adler | Epstein litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05133-05136 | 05/11/2009 | William Berger | | Subpoena Clinton and others on | | | | | +| | | | | Sid witness list | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01749-01751 | 10/28/2009 | | Phaedra Xanthos | Final affidavit from forensic | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05125-05132 | 05/05/2009 | William Berger | | Response to motion to compel all | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05115.05117 | 04/27/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Epstein depos | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01699 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie | | VZ depo /S s | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05120-05121 | 05/04/2009 | William Berger | | Reporter asking how the depo of | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05095-05098 | 07/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | IICZ ist | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01694 | 10/17/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | | PFS | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05066-05067 | 05/06/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Epstein sealed records and TV | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05054-05065 | 08/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Potential witnesses | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05049.05053 | 08/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Subpoenas for potential | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04957-04964 | 09/04/2009 | | Scott | -2 Juan Aless statement and | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04952-04953 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | Epstein injunction filing — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04955.04956 | 09/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley Edwards | Epstein invoice | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04916-04920 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | | | | | | | +| | | AC.O ‘ | | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04899 | 09/10/2009 | Bradley | lacquie | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04893.04896 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04890 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04884.04885 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | Epstein Discovery ;i | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01469 | 07/17/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Discussions about the Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04745.04747 | 08/04/2009 | | Jacquie | Epstein depo in New York | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04738-04744 | 08/25/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Hearing regarding the Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04660 | 10/22/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Epstein AUSA — Attorneys Fees | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04642-04646 | 09/11/2009 | | Beth Williamson | Discussions about Brad's | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|---------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04607-04617 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie | | Holding Fed Subs until we get | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04526-04535 | 10/17/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Two Ideas regarding strategy , | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04488.04490 | 07/18/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Taking the 5, | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01362 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | | Getting the forensic aspect off | | | | | +| | | | | the ground —epstein's asset | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04481-04487 | 08/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein Subpoena | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05465-05467 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | | Subpoenas for trial | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05470 | 07/11/2009 | | Wayne Black | Flight Logs | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05496-05497 | 08/10/2009 | | Alfredo | Phone Numbers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Rodriguez | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | | +| 05501 07/21/2009 Wayne Black litigation strategy | | | | +| 4. ) j | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05524-05533 07/23/2009 Wayne Black Add e . or people involved in | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Ed .7 Widepos in Jane doe's case Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05635 10/22/2009 Pat New developments that require | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| / 4 | protected by privacy rights() | | | + +Ma Jaffe, Welssing,M. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|---------|-------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05640 | 10/29/2009 | Pat | | New Epstein victim | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05652-05653 | 04/01/2009 | | Carolyn | personal discussion | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05671 | 10/22/2009 | | Pat | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05696 | 05/11/2009 | | Wayne Black | Phone number for one of the | | | | | +| | | | | other girls on the list of | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05815-05816 | 04/01/2009 | Carolyn | | Taking the depos of everyone | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05820-05821 | 07/23/2009 | | Wayne Black | Dates for depos of all witnesses | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05824-05825 | 07/23/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Paula Heil | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05828-05829 | 07/23/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Dates for depos of all witnesses in the case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05833-05835 | 07/23/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | FBI has original flight logs and they interviewed pilots | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05839-05841 | 07/23/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Copies of the flight logs | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05869-05870 | 04/01/2009 | Carolyn ██████████ | ██████████ | Personal convo between Brad and Mom | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05913-05914 | 04/01/2009 | Carolyn ██████████ | ██████████ | Personal convo between Brad and Mom | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +MILJaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|---|-------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05995 | 04/01/2009 | Bradley Edwards | | Carolyn | Third art subpoenas for | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06513-06523 | 06/15/2009 | | | Wayne Black | Ghisella Maxwell info | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06699-06701 | 06/17/2009 | Wayne Black | | | Epstein litigation | | | | | +| | | | | | ,-.44t i | | | | | +| | | | | | / 4\‘' " | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07079-07089 | 09/03/2009 | | | Pat Diaz | | | | | | +| | | | | | Discussion ut girls involved in | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07437-07439 | 10/19/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Ronald Wise | New evidence of Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07936-07958 | 04/28/2009 | Earleen Cote | | | Cases against mansion nightclub | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08006-08011 | 06/03/2009 | | | Wayne Black | Getting addresses for people for | | | | | +| | | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11186-11187 | 08/19/2009 | I I | U | I | Plaintiffs Witness List | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | pATE | LO, | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|--------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 26479-26481. | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Assistance on the Epstein Case | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 27155-27159 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | PACER entries | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26604-26605 | 10/27/2009 | Phaedra Xanthos | Ken Jenne | Political | | | | | +| | | | | Cont / vertisement for | | | | | +| | | | | t Te I n Little St. James | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26570 | 08/13/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Marc Nurik | | | | | | +| | | | | Discussions about Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04954 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacquie Johnson | Creation of another Doe file | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06665-06670 | 08/12/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Epstein Costs | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06675-06676 | 08/26/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Personal convo in regards to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +MO, Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman + +| | RATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06679-06682 | 08/26/2009 | | Shawn Gilbert | Personal convo in regards to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07590-07594 | 05/13/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Office information | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08451-08453 | 08/17/2009 | | Pat= | Updated witne(& | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08455-08456 | 06/03/2009 | | | VanityFalr | | | | | +| | | | | ) r. | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08466-08479 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness Info that we need to use | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01767 | 07/06/2009 | Wayne Black | | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08379 | 06/06/2009 | Bradley Edwards | Wayne Black | Info on Former FHP trooper | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08399 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Epstein affidavit to the reply | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +En Jaffe, Weissing,IIIIII, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08406 | 10/30/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Adler | Flying epstein rape survivor to St. | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05697 | 08/19/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Meeting with client | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20330-20334 | 08/24/2009 | | Pat | Serving Alan Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20327-20329 | 10/17/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20100-20102 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley Edwards | Epstein's arrival at his building | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20283-20326 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | | | | | | +| | | /1 NIISY | | | | | | | +| | | | Mike Fisten | Research regarding Mr. Visoskl | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20092-20099 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Epstein travel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +M, Jaffe, WeissIng, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|--------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------------------------|------------| +| 20085-20091 | 10/15/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Questions from accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19996-20084 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Visoski Research and Questi Vn | | | | | +| | | | | | -id ork | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20217-20218 | 08/04/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Info on Copperfielg | | | | | +| | | | | ,r | | discovery | | | +| | | | | ‘e/7 )14/ Y | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | to the | | of the admissible evidence; | | +| 20213-20216 | 08/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Info on Copperfteld | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20211-20212 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Pilots depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20207-20210 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | | List of witness | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20201-20204 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Serving Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------| +| 20193-20200 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Proof of him being out of FL — | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19982-19985 09/03/2009 Jacquie Mike Fisten Dave Rogers depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19988 10/07/2009 Jacquie Mike Fisten Depositions \ | | | | +| ft: lA("a 5:- | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19971-19981 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Mike Fisten | | | | +| SeAI rshowitz | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | Irrelevant | | not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 19969-19970 08/18/2009 Mike Fisten | | | | +| Subpoenas for Pilots Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19962-19968 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Working with the FBI to get some | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20190-20192 08/24/2009 Pat Roberts Personal emalls regarding Brad's | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20187-20189 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Epstein travel Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 19959-19961 | 07/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Flight logs for Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 00156-00157 | 07/09/2009 | | Paul Cassell | 2255 Problem Ns" | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15366.15367 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness Info that we need to use | | | | | +| | | | | ,.. (44<:- \S | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01003-01005 | 10/12/2009 | | Paul Cassell | AsseSt ovement by Jeffrey | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01013-01014 | 10/29/2009 | | Cara | Subpoenaing Epstein's attorneys | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01042 | 07/22/2009 | Marc Nurik | | New Info that our investigators | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03133-03134 | 06/09/2009 | Josh Roberts | | Personal conversation | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 03129-03130 | 06/09/2009 | Josh [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03119-03121 | 06/09/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Josh [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05440-05441 | 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) | CW Personal information | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02593-02594 | 05/13/2009 | T. [REDACTED] (wife) | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Regarding personal information. | Privileged document- irrelevant and not calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence, privacy rights of parties involved, spouse privilege | +| 18877-18879 | 09/10/2009 | Marc Nurik | Bradley Edwards | Concerning the names of potential witnesses and the issuance of subpoena's for them. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18344-18347 | 08/24/2009 | [REDACTED] Edwards | Mike Fisten | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +#### Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Mt Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------|-------------|----------------------------------|-----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 18339-18340 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Investigative information | and | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18341-18343 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative Information | and | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18853-18854 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | Concerning the names | of | | | | | +| | | | | potential witnesses and | the | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18337.18338 | 08/03/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Investigative Information | and | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18306 | 10/16/2009 | Pat | Ken Jenne | List of future depo's in Epstein | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18307 | 10/17/2009 | Mike Fisten | | | | | | | | +| | | | | Investigative Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE | TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--|-------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 18308-18309 | 10/18/2006 | Mike Fisten | | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18188-18189 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18184.18185 | 08/26/2009 | Mike Fisten | | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18186.18187 | 08/31/2009 | | | Jacquie | Discussion of potential witnesses | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | 08/24/2009 | AC< 18180-18183 | | Mike etyl | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | i s' | | Ilit illir | | | | | | | | +| 05256-05257 | 07/21/2009 | Bradley Edwards | | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------|----------------|------------|-----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05253 | 08/24/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05279-05280 | 08/24/2009 | Pat | Investigative | Discussion | | reNWork | | | | +| | | | | | | | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05315.05318 | 07/26/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | blon | re: | | | | | +| | | | strategy I | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05209-05211 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | In vestigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db04ee6debe6012054ff2ab8767b2749303902d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265/EFTA02765265.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,10974 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765265.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 183, + "chars": 488159, + "elapsed_seconds": 44.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nHt. I t.ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 536.1120000000001, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELYS \nSTRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY REFERE \nPRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED \nTAL EXHIBITS AND TO \nCUMENTS CONTAINING \nPRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.05199999999999, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 538.5778198242188, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 538.5778198242188, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 74.05199999999999, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "atjanna", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 505.10302734375 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 505.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Court Orders Violated by Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 407.181884765625, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 407.181884765625, + 120.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 120.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "All docum duced by any party or non-party in this matter.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 469.34625244140625, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 469.34625244140625, + 505.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 505.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Timeline of the Privileged Materials at Issue 4\u2022Alic", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 497.0625, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 497.0625, + 235.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 235.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A Comparison of Privilege Log and Epstein's March 2, 2018 Untime r xhibits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 538.5172119140625, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 538.5172119140625, + 229.863037109375 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 229.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SuiCr of Relief Sought by", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 483.363037109375 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 483.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 541.1583862304688, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 541.1583862304688, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO UNTIMEL46M OSITE EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 493.20831298828125, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 493.20831298828125, + 347.3035583496094 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 347.3035583496094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 461.448, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 102.87 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 391.9598693847656, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 391.9598693847656, + 387.35302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 387.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 435.74399999999997, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 435.74399999999997, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 318.33 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 61.692 + ], + [ + 489.9267578125, + 61.692 + ], + [ + 489.9267578125, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Lo >i\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 60.325 + ], + [ + 488.02813720703125, + 60.325 + ], + [ + 488.02813720703125, + 75.214111328125 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 75.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.55206298828125, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.55206298828125, + 77.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 77.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 488.02813720703125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 488.02813720703125, + 78.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 78.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.2, + 71.68 + ], + [ + 488.77813720703125, + 71.68 + ], + [ + 488.77813720703125, + 86.2041015625 + ], + [ + 307.2, + 86.2041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.788, + 71.90400000000001 + ], + [ + 492.4466247558594, + 71.90400000000001 + ], + [ + 492.4466247558594, + 87.4541015625 + ], + [ + 310.788, + 87.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.52813720703125, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.52813720703125, + 78.214111328125 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 78.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 77.7041015625 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 77.7041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileae Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.642, + 64.872 + ], + [ + 486.8195495605469, + 64.872 + ], + [ + 486.8195495605469, + 80.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 307.642, + 80.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 487.27813720703125, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 487.27813720703125, + 79.8240966796875 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.8240966796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.87, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 488.3896484375, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 488.3896484375, + 79.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 306.87, + 79.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 485.3166198730469, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 485.3166198730469, + 80.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 80.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.098, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.6396484375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.6396484375, + 79.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.098, + 79.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 488.77813720703125, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 488.77813720703125, + 76.9541015625 + ], + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 76.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PrIvIle e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.891, + 62.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 486.0865173339844, + 62.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 486.0865173339844, + 76.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.891, + 76.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.9267578125, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.9267578125, + 76.78997802734375 + ], + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 76.78997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 78.214111328125 + ], + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 78.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.677490234375 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 64.677490234375 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 79.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 79.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 79.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.255, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 487.335, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 487.335, + 79.884 + ], + [ + 309.255, + 79.884 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.25500000000005, + 63.9375 + ], + [ + 488.7596435546875, + 63.9375 + ], + [ + 488.7596435546875, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 309.25500000000005, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.25500000000005, + 62.4375 + ], + [ + 489.0695495605469, + 62.4375 + ], + [ + 489.0695495605469, + 77.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 309.25500000000005, + 77.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.87, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 489.4665222167969, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 489.4665222167969, + 81.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.87, + 81.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 64.56599999999999 + ], + [ + 488.7967529296875, + 64.56599999999999 + ], + [ + 488.7967529296875, + 80.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 80.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.23, + 67.628 + ], + [ + 489.4495544433594, + 67.628 + ], + [ + 489.4495544433594, + 84.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 307.23, + 84.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 488.0467529296875, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 488.0467529296875, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "=Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.94003295898438, + 80.518 + ], + [ + 539.4483642578125, + 80.518 + ], + [ + 539.4483642578125, + 96.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 252.94003295898438, + 96.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 489.0666198730469, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 489.0666198730469, + 77.9541015625 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 77.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 489.5467529296875, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 489.5467529296875, + 80.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 80.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.432, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 488.7165222167969, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 488.7165222167969, + 82.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.432, + 82.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Lo e\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 488.3896484375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 488.3896484375, + 81.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 81.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 488.3548583984375, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 488.3548583984375, + 78.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 78.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8166198730469, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8166198730469, + 76.9541015625 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 76.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.0865173339844, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.0865173339844, + 81.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 81.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 488.3195495605469, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 488.3195495605469, + 80.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 80.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 485.7165222167969, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 485.7165222167969, + 80.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 80.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 485.73486328125, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 485.73486328125, + 79.714111328125 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 79.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.836, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 486.0695495605469, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 486.0695495605469, + 82.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 304.836, + 82.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.512, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 486.48486328125, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 486.48486328125, + 77.4541015625 + ], + [ + 304.512, + 77.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23.2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 488.093505859375, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 488.093505859375, + 80.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 80.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 67.204 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 67.204 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 82.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 82.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 487.2596435546875, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 487.2596435546875, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 487.6396484375, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 487.6396484375, + 80.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 80.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 487.5865173339844, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 487.5865173339844, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "=Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.69003295898438, + 80.518 + ], + [ + 540.2080078125, + 80.518 + ], + [ + 540.2080078125, + 97.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 253.69003295898438, + 97.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.82800000000003, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 494.7165222167969, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 494.7165222167969, + 81.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 312.82800000000003, + 81.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 66.57 + ], + [ + 493.26214599609375, + 66.57 + ], + [ + 493.26214599609375, + 82.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 82.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23.2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 62.667 + ], + [ + 493.2508544921875, + 62.667 + ], + [ + 493.2508544921875, + 77.800048828125 + ], + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 77.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.72, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.72, + 79.884 + ], + [ + 311.64000000000004, + 79.884 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.248, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 492.5096435546875, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 492.5096435546875, + 77.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 311.248, + 77.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.424, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 492.82318115234375, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 492.82318115234375, + 78.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 312.424, + 78.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.03200000000004, + 61.056 + ], + [ + 493.614501953125, + 61.056 + ], + [ + 493.614501953125, + 76.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 312.03200000000004, + 76.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.44000000000005, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 492.16583251953125, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 492.16583251953125, + 79.5 + ], + [ + 310.44000000000005, + 79.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.278, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 488.2591247558594, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 488.2591247558594, + 78.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 307.278, + 78.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.236, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 490.57318115234375, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 490.57318115234375, + 80.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 309.236, + 80.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.05, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 492.114501953125, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 492.114501953125, + 78.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 310.05, + 78.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 488.661865234375, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 488.661865234375, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.01200000000006, + 65.817 + ], + [ + 492.0892333984375, + 65.817 + ], + [ + 492.0892333984375, + 82.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 310.01200000000006, + 82.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 486.16583251953125, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 486.16583251953125, + 76.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 76.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 486.0091247558594, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 486.0091247558594, + 78.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 78.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 487.6421813964844, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 487.6421813964844, + 77.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 77.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 487.2445068359375, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 487.2445068359375, + 77.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 77.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 76.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 76.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 488.45233154296875, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 488.45233154296875, + 76.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 76.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.305, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.411865234375, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.411865234375, + 75.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 305.305, + 75.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.87, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 488.7445068359375, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 488.7445068359375, + 75.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 306.87, + 75.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.432, + 65.61099999999999 + ], + [ + 488.76214599609375, + 65.61099999999999 + ], + [ + 488.76214599609375, + 81.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 306.432, + 81.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.305, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.7818603515625, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.7818603515625, + 77.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 305.305, + 77.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 64.464 + ], + [ + 485.71923828125, + 64.464 + ], + [ + 485.71923828125, + 79.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 79.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.2445068359375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.2445068359375, + 78.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 78.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.92, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4320373535156, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4320373535156, + 77.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 304.92, + 77.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 489.08319091796875, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 489.08319091796875, + 80.20758056640625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 80.20758056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 487.1820373535156, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 487.1820373535156, + 79.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 75.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 75.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.92, + 64.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 488.46990966796875, + 64.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 488.46990966796875, + 79.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.92, + 79.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 59.849999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.6820373535156, + 59.849999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.6820373535156, + 75.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 75.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.15814208984375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.15814208984375, + 78.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 78.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 486.0892333984375, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 486.0892333984375, + 78.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 78.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.57318115234375, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.57318115234375, + 78.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 78.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 486.114501953125, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 486.114501953125, + 76.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 76.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 489.4320373535156, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 489.4320373535156, + 77.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 77.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.5892028808594, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.5892028808594, + 78.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 78.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.6820373535156, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.6820373535156, + 78.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 78.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8195495605469, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8195495605469, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 305.68999999999994, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.39215087890625, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.39215087890625, + 78.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 78.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 79.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 79.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 487.66583251953125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 487.66583251953125, + 79.47760009765625 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 79.47760009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lois\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 61.207 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 61.207 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 75.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 75.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 78.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 78.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.71923828125, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.71923828125, + 77.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 77.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 483.411865234375, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 483.411865234375, + 77.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 77.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.5467529296875, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.5467529296875, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.2031555175781, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.2031555175781, + 77.97760009765625 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 77.97760009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.133, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.864501953125, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.864501953125, + 78.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 302.133, + 78.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.57318115234375, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.57318115234375, + 76.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 76.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.133, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.2031555175781, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.2031555175781, + 77.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 302.133, + 77.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.826, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 490.9945068359375, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 490.9945068359375, + 80.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 308.826, + 80.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.624, + 64.974 + ], + [ + 490.57318115234375, + 64.974 + ], + [ + 490.57318115234375, + 79.625 + ], + [ + 309.624, + 79.625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.826, + 65.076 + ], + [ + 491.03582763671875, + 65.076 + ], + [ + 491.03582763671875, + 80.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 308.826, + 80.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.848, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.4531555175781, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.4531555175781, + 80.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 308.848, + 80.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 488.32318115234375, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 488.32318115234375, + 79.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 307.25600000000003, + 79.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.23, + 67.095 + ], + [ + 489.95233154296875, + 67.095 + ], + [ + 489.95233154296875, + 82.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 307.23, + 82.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.22999999999996, + 66.99 + ], + [ + 488.2591247558594, + 66.99 + ], + [ + 488.2591247558594, + 83.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 307.22999999999996, + 83.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.439, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 489.864501953125, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 489.864501953125, + 79.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 308.439, + 79.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.432, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 488.76214599609375, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 488.76214599609375, + 81.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 306.432, + 81.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 483.0091247558594, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 483.0091247558594, + 77.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 488.7857971191406, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 488.7857971191406, + 79.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 79.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 483.864501953125, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 483.864501953125, + 79.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.454, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 486.82318115234375, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 486.82318115234375, + 80.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 304.454, + 80.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.53582763671875, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.53582763671875, + 78.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 78.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.161865234375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.161865234375, + 77.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 77.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 488.0467529296875, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 488.0467529296875, + 80.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 80.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.9945068359375, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.9945068359375, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.05206298828125, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.05206298828125, + 79.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 79.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 486.82318115234375, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 486.82318115234375, + 78.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 78.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.0091247558594, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.0091247558594, + 78.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 78.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4531555175781, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4531555175781, + 78.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 78.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.4158020019531, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.4158020019531, + 77.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 77.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 77.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 77.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 482.364501953125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 482.364501953125, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 486.4531555175781, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 486.4531555175781, + 78.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 78.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 77.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 77.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.3896484375, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.3896484375, + 77.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 77.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.07318115234375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 486.07318115234375, + 79.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 79.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.926, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.911865234375, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 484.911865234375, + 77.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 302.926, + 77.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.114501953125, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.114501953125, + 77.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 77.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 64.56599999999999 + ], + [ + 485.2818603515625, + 64.56599999999999 + ], + [ + 485.2818603515625, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.114501953125, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.114501953125, + 79.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 306.84499999999997, + 79.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 484.6396484375, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 484.6396484375, + 78.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 78.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 63.50000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 63.50000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.2591247558594, + 78.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 78.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2.23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 64.464 + ], + [ + 486.6318359375, + 64.464 + ], + [ + 486.6318359375, + 79.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 79.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.5091247558594, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.5091247558594, + 76.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 76.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.454, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 486.5096435546875, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 486.5096435546875, + 81.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.454, + 81.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 77.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 77.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 486.7818603515625, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 486.7818603515625, + 80.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 80.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 65.508 + ], + [ + 485.7031555175781, + 81.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 81.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 75.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 75.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.512, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 485.7445068359375, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 485.7445068359375, + 76.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 304.512, + 76.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 483.4945068359375, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 483.4945068359375, + 76.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 76.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.92, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 486.36053466796875, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 486.36053466796875, + 77.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 304.92, + 77.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 484.2445068359375, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 484.2445068359375, + 79.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 79.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.868, + 66.78 + ], + [ + 486.80206298828125, + 66.78 + ], + [ + 486.80206298828125, + 82.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 304.868, + 82.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 487.5091247558594, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 487.5091247558594, + 79.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 79.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 64.89 + ], + [ + 487.26214599609375, + 64.89 + ], + [ + 487.26214599609375, + 79.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 79.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 63.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 485.59197998046875, + 63.29888916015625 + ], + [ + 485.59197998046875, + 77.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 77.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.911865234375, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 484.911865234375, + 75.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 75.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.03582763671875, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.03582763671875, + 74.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 74.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.868, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 486.0318603515625, + 78.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 304.868, + 78.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log,- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.92, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 76.23 + ], + [ + 304.92, + 76.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4945068359375, + 75.71759033203125 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 75.71759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 67.31 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 67.31 + ], + [ + 485.661865234375, + 82.21759033203125 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 82.21759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 489.114501953125, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 489.114501953125, + 77.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 77.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 486.2637939453125, + 65.199 + ], + [ + 486.2637939453125, + 80.0850830078125 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 80.0850830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.22999999999996, + 64.974 + ], + [ + 488.32318115234375, + 64.974 + ], + [ + 488.32318115234375, + 80.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 307.22999999999996, + 80.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.826, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 490.66583251953125, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 490.66583251953125, + 81.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 308.826, + 81.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.826, + 67.73400000000001 + ], + [ + 489.3891296386719, + 67.73400000000001 + ], + [ + 489.3891296386719, + 84.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 308.826, + 84.06353759765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 198 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 163 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765265" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e56214354cdbbfa7913c5020315c22e07f26b78 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOO4BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +### NOTICE OF SPECIAL S E + +/ S PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Motio a ests outlined below will be heard before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom Wes Palm Beach, Florida 33401, as follows: at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, + +# PENDING MOTIONS: + +- 1. 3/5/18, PI unter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from al Doe et in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 +- 2. /18 intiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Default Against Defendant Scott thstein 16/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Case agement Conference +- 4. 3/1/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof + +A Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein has listed the Motions in the sc he believes they should be addressed by the Court. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff disagrees with the sequence and believes his March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Untimely Supplemental Exhibits should be heard first. + +3/2/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] Supplement to Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative, to Adjust the Order of Proof + +5. 12/11/17, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence + +6. 3/2/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims Against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +7. 3/5/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special [REDACTED] + +8. 3/5/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log + +9. 3/2/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court Permission to Alter Trial Evidence to Comply with Rule 2.425 + +10. 3/2/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court's Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names With Initials of [REDACTED] Three Clients on Trial Exhibits + +11. 1/10/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements [Motion was denied as to [REDACTED] three clients on 2/28/18, but Court reserved ruling on other tort claimants] + +12. 2/12/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information + +13. 2/15/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion for Adverse Inference Instructions Regarding Epstein's Fifth Amendment Assertions to Financial discovery and April 15, 2011 Request to Produce + +14. 12/4/17, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Notices of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Implicating the Fifth Amendment [Sections II-V only] and Attorney-Client Privileges + +15. 2/26/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Compel (Request for Admissions) + +- 16. 11/13/17, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence 11/17/17, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence +- 17. 1/9/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Damages Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude His Testimony +- 18. 1/18/18, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. a Moti in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit 132 IS y +- 19. 2/8/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ' Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information +- 20. 2/1/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epst otion in Limine on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Newly Disclo na xhibits and to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Who it Deposed in this Matter +- 21. 2/2/18, Plaintiff/Counter-Defcndan J pstein's Request for Judicial Notice +- 22. Objections to Deposition ' s ti + +DATE: Thursday, March a t 18 + +TIME: 10:00 a.m. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 6, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Path Primary: Scott@IInkrockljtw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco nkrocklaw.com m Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +T Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Ices West Palm Beac me seam co sx care scarolat Co-Cs hart & Shipley, P.A. yard m Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff dwards + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt(aFLAnpellateLaw.com Co-CounseiorMlendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

VIA EMAIL
Paul Cassell
383 S. University Str.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

VIA EMAIL
Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or ediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeapi ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or yoke impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la a mabihdad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway,West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por I fijada para su comparecencia en los tribun recibir esta notification si el tiempo an comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si ust eti\ ' e iscapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." dias antes de la cita ediatamente despues de + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o e okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko akte ammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan ivillinal Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat o en ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin rel a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke g si u gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6208d15f3e8b804579abb95dfccc708d3bd1ead8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448/EFTA02765448.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765448.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 9998, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 539.08837890625, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 539.08837890625, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL\nS\nE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.288, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 410.65200000000004, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 410.65200000000004, + 342.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 198.288, + 342.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PENDING MOTIONS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 233.3624725341797, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 233.3624725341797, + 451.10302734375 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 451.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 443.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765448" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52ed919fa1801492149a1b5df2748cf5576d9d63 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT Y EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF NO OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY PAUL CASSELL. ON BEHALF OF E.W. AND JANE DOE, OR DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. MOVING TO SEAL COURT RECORDS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A DETERMINATION ON HOW THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE TREATED + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant J E ("Epstein") gives notice that, in light of the parties' differing views over th attached to Epstein's Appendix in Support of his Response in Opposition to De Counter-Plaintiff J. a Ca) Second Supplement to Motion in Addressing the Scope of Admissible Evidence, Epstein will not oppose Paul Cau r filing a Motion seeking to seal the documents in accordance with the requi I Administrative Order 2.303-0/09 until such time as the Court has made a de n Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special =. Paul Cassell, who has appeared on behalf of E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe, has requested that the documents be sealed to protect his clients' interests, however, his clients' names were redacted from the Court filing. + +counsel's assertion that Epstein's current some inappropriate or unethical way is completely without counsel and Cassell that if they will identify by are attorney-client communications, Epstein will segregate counsel obtained the documents in merit. Epstein has already notified number the documents they assert and seal those documents. Lastly, Epstein wants the Court to understand that his agreement to not object is not based o in his position that the documents on the disc were produced many years ago contains relevant and highly material e-mails that Epstein believes are disc was also produced to William Scherer in the Razorback litigati documents they claim were not to be produced were attached in 2013, any work product protection has long ago been waived. any doubt t the disc Because the se some of the iblWto deposition + +## ERTIFI + +I certify that the foregoing documen Service List below on March 6, 2018, throu of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). furnished to the attorneys listed on the 's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule + +> INK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina(alinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +| Jack Scarola Seamy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsx@-searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pjs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAnpellateLaw.com r-Plaintiff Co-CounseiSiendant/ J. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Marc Pottinger LLC Law Offices of | S. Nurik | +| One E. Brow 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 | ou yard, Suite 700 | +| Ft. Laude Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 | 3301 | +| marcOnunkl bradeenlIc.com staff.efile®pathotojustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. aul Cassell 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 iaoldbergerOagwpa.com smahoneyaagwpa.com Co-Counsel for PlaintW/Court,r-Defdndant Jeffrey Epstein | .com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein A EMAIL 383 S. University Str. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 cassellp@law.utah.edu Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. and Jane Doe | +| VIA Jay Howell +6s jayhowell.com | EMAIL Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..014a83e1374522c1d6b7579ab3a1140c39782a5c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454/EFTA02765454.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765454.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6836, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT Y EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF NO OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY PAUL CASSELL. ON BEHALF OF \nE.W. AND JANE DOE, OR DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J. \nMOVING TO SEAL COURT RECORDS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A \nDETERMINATION ON HOW THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE TREATED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 535.3272094726562, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 535.3272094726562, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765454" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ec6c6f04530f82abbb8a7a147a058067a67f267 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.md @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, GO + +## NOTICE OF FILING PAGE & LINE 14G1ATIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM BERGER TAKEN 2.23.18 + +Counter-Plaintiff, J. Edward by acid through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits his Page and Line Designations o0 e Deposition of William Berger taken February 23, 'S) 2018 as follows: + +- 1) 4:1-37:16 C +- 2) 37:25-54:21 +- 3) 131:IAV6 +- 4) 108:8 "44 1-140:7 +- 6) 146:15-150:15 +- 7) 160:18-160:20 +- 8) 161:4-161:17 +- 9) 162:17-163:12 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page & Line Designations Deposition of William Berger taken 2.23.18 + +Page 2 of 4 + +10) 163:17-164:25 + +11) 164:25-169:2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page & Line Designations Deposition of William Berger taken 2.23.18 + +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Page & Line Designations Deposition of William Berger taken 2.23.18 + +Page 4 of 4 + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47f7ede7202f76c5c071319f0cfb8e54062ed96a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457/EFTA02765457.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765457.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3246, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 113.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 113.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PAGE & LINE 14G1ATIONS FOR \nDEPOSITION OF WILLIAM BERGER TAKEN 2.23.18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 326.15716552734375 + ], + [ + 466.4622497558594, + 326.15716552734375 + ], + [ + 466.4622497558594, + 358.6603088378906 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 358.6603088378906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 340.27200000000005, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 155.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765457" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d820d74cc7e0af780c1ef5f9955b2d36b0266eb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.md @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffts), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +/ + +## NOTICE OF FILING EDWARD4t/BS ITUTE PROPOSED ADVERSE INFERENCE JURY INSTRUCTION + +J. , by and through ed counsel, hereby provides Notice of the Filing of a Substitute Proposed Adv Jury Instruction as attached. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that nett cop of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached r t, thi 20 + +> OLA ar No.: 169440 ey E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and ccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@sParcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-31.11 Attorneys for + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Substitute Adverse Inference Jury Instruction + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 2009CA0408003000CMBAG + +Notice of Filing Substitute Proposed Adverse Inference Jury Instruction + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; ICam®Iinkrocklaw.com; + +Angela®Iinkrocklaw.com; TanyaginIcrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +4ohic iS 4/) 9 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@suriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## SUBSTITUTE PROPOSED ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION + +## ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferr m the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the potion that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil laws hen person, based upon the Fifth Amendment, refuses to answer quessi d evidence is offered against him which is relevant to the case. + +Therefore, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein refused to il r questions when confronted with relevant evidence against him on the d that his answers may tend to incriminate him, then you may, but are no to, infer that his answers would have incriminated him. You r this, together with the other evidence, in determining the issues of -, 'ut a Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein cannot rest solely on the any in erence. + +Authority: Fla. St. Jury Ins. 301.11 Coquina Investments v. Rothstei Sept. 28, 2012) v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976); 0786-cv-2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55ec1cf1a4a6022e3f3e95403b438f507e464279 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461/EFTA02765461.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765461.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3824, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING EDWARD4t/BS ITUTE \nPROPOSED ADVERSE INFERENCE JURY INSTRUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 465.28839111328125, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 465.28839111328125, + 358.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 358.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 152.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBSTITUTE PROPOSED ADVERSE \nINFERENCE INSTRUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.06399999999996, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.06399999999996, + 106.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 106.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 485.0202331542969, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 485.0202331542969, + 138.87091064453125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 138.87091064453125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765461" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49da36ccd252d5ab6c2b2da562f643664bef7cfe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.md @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +cos + +#### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION F R COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING. AND APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL + +''\*' Counter-Plaintiff M, by and nde rsigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion V o to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for A on imited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special , an support states as follows: + +rporates by reference the timeline and arguments contained in his Motion to St ISErNin's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference merits Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log, filed on March 32018. + +- 2. In addition to those arguments, states as follows: + +For brevity, shall refer to Epstein's motion as the "Motion for Court to Declare Relevance." + +adv. Epstein + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Re uest for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special + +# A. Epstein's Counsel is Intentionally Referencing Privileged Materials in Public Filings. + +3. First, to the extent that the claim of ignorance outlined in the first five pages of Epstein's Motion to Declare Relevance was ever legitimate, that claim ended once undersigned counsel notified Epstein's counsel that they were in possession of privileged materials. As can be seen from the correspondence attached to Epstein's Motion to Declare Relevance, that ( notification first occurred on March 4, 2018. Moreover, on March 4,..\*dwards filed his Motion to Strike, in which he specifically identified 49 privilege I munications listed on (14. / ., 2011 Privilege Log that are being used by Epste 1) counsel. + +4. Despite now having been provided wi "%lc reference to each and every one of the privileged communications at issue. Epstei ' obligations and has instead continued to kI public record of the Court. The o te disregard of the privileged ch cter ese documents is that this is an attempt to cause a media circus, taint the jury poolt d attyprevent the parties to the Malicious Prosecution action from picking a jury as presently i edul . el has refused to comply with their ethical y refer to and describe this information in the conclusion that can be drawn from this willful + +# B. EpsteIlland His Counsel Have "Jumped the Shark."2 + +is Notice of Filing Appendix. Epstein, through counsel, includes privileged materials udder a section titled `' ' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme." If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether + +2 The idiom "jumping the shark" is a pejorative reference to an unsuccessful gimmick to salvage a failing enterprise. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Re uest for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special + +Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue his malicious lawsuit against , it turns out that was secretly involved in the Ponzi scheme after all! For example, Epstein claims that the emails are "evidence that shows En direct participation with Rothstein to avoid the structured settlement statute for an Epstein case" and questions whether thesii ie- k ails "were turned over to the U.S. Attorney." See Epstein's Mot. at pages 8 and 7. + +6. To be blunt, this accusation continues Epstein's bas- cious assault on character. The Federal Government conducted a yea ong investigation into Rothstein's criminal enterprise, which included access to e I on the RRA server. No one (aside from Jeffrey Epstein) ever suggested, implie ≥aced **that Brad had any involvement or knew anything about Rothstein' activities. Brad was never even formally interviewed by the authorities. Yet Ep n now claims that an e-mail string between Scott Rothstein and at least five other atto s, c uding Brad who were never implicated in and had no involvement whats ver ' othstein's Ponzi scheme is direct evidence of involvement. And this s ing revelation rests on evidence that has sat in the files of Epstein's** legal army for ove years 3 + +7. st n accusing Matt Weissing, Esq. of being directly involved in Rothstein's Ponzi a . even Jaffe, Esq.? How about Mark Fistos, Esq.? Were they all secret coconspirato who have managed to avoid justice for the past nine years? Justice that only Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel can deliver upon? Does Epstein plan to report his "bombshell" findings to + +is somewhat confused as to how Epstein could have relied upon these privileged materials to continue his malicious lawsuit until August 16. 2012 if. as Epstein's counsel represents, the specific emails at issue were not discovered until a few weeks ago... + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Re uest for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special + +the U.S. Attorney's Office? How about the F.B.I.? Because the accusation made by Epstein, through his counsel, on the eve of this Malicious Prosecution trial is that Brad S was directly involved in multiple felonies." These are serious accusation, and and every other victim of this assault will welcome the chance to respond the moment Epstein agilattcps beyond the absolute protection of the litigation privilege. + +8. Epstein, through counsel, also suggests that Jack S d Paul Cassell, Esq. may somehow be implicated in nefarious conduct and requests their\_depositions in a desperate attempt to avoid trial once again. The emails in questiou/ar iaence of nothing and are not relevant to this malicious prosecution claim, no mat erhovtkperverted a spin Epstein applies to them. + +9. Epstein and his counsel are Ik very fine line in testing just how far Florida's absolute litigation privilege will god` iti of em. Undersigned counsel looks forward to finding out the answer to this question, d ers he has posed, at the hearing on Thursday. + +### Conclusion + +For the for ing ons, Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged N f ocuments and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearin ntment of a Special should be denied. + +It seems we have come full circle from the Initial Complaint. + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special [REDACTED] + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) + +Searcy Denney Searola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and Appointment of a Special [REDACTED] + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fa8057721512af1d006deba4ec7073c9ca8f54d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465/EFTA02765465.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765465.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 9193, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION F R COURT TO DECLARE \nRELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND REOUEST \nFOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING. AND \nAPPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 533.9166259765625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 533.9166259765625, + 384.363037109375 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 384.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Counsel is Intentionally Referencing Privileged Materials in Public Filings.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 546.9133911132812, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 546.9133911132812, + 134.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 134.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. EpsteIlland His Counsel Have \"Jumped the Shark.\"2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 383.0099792480469, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 383.0099792480469, + 548.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 548.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 335.376, + 492.35302734375 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 492.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 134.46 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765465" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f5f0ca7343bc9b8be78bdc186b8483a4e6f9ee5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.md @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +#### , \_ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION, REMOVE CASE FROM TRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATE SET FORTH IN RULE 1.440 + +cos + +Counter-Plaintiff -, by and th;ogh undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Rein' ve Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1 support states as follows: + +- 1. As for months, Epstein has no intention of ever trying this malicious prosecution the eve of every trial date, Epstein files a host of motions in an effort to avoid g to a jury for his malicious lawsuit against M. +- 2. Q s latest attempt to continue that trial, Epstein misrepresents the remaining claims the term "Action" without defining what he is referring to. As can be seen from the record, however, there are two separate and independent Actions involving different parties and different claims, and it is undisputable that M' action against Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, to which Rothstein is not a party, is at issue. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +## Action #1 — Epstein v. Rothstein (Second Amended Complaint) + +3. First, Epstein has a claim for Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process against Scott Rothstein. That claim is pled in the Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on August 21, 2011. + +4. , however, is not a party to that case as Epstein voluntarilyNlismissed NY from the Second Amended Complaint on August 16, 2012.' tl Oin\*alone nullifies uk, Epstein's entire argument that Motion to Set Case for Tria was not ripe. Rule 1.440(b), on which Epstein relies, unequivocally states that only a pa otice an action for trial: + +Thereafter, any party may file and serve a notjc6lbt j e action is at issue and ready to be set for trial. . . + +5. As a non-party to the Second A complaint, clearly had no ability to notice Epstein's case against Rothste< da . ......, or I. and he never attempted to do so. Epstein. however, has conceded that his act' cg t Rothstein may not be set for trial given, inter alia, the Motion for Default Agains oth t that was filed yesterday. Thus, if Epstein would like to try his action against Rot ein (assuming Epstein has finally figured out what case he is actually pursuing against tf> ncol tible defendant in federal prison), he apparently has a lot of work left to do, induct\* o strating that the Second Amended Complaint and this latest Motion for Defaul),ss roperly served on Rothstein and that Rothstein was given opportunity to respond. + +6. M, however, has no dog in that fight because he is not a party to the Second Amended Complaint. + +&#x27; Amon other reasons, Epstein's voluntary dismissal of resulted in a "bona fide termination" of Action NI in favor, a necessary element for independent malicious prosecution claim in Action O. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +# Action #2 — v. Epstein (Fourth Amended Counterclaim) + +7. The second action pending is a claim for Malicious Prosecution filed by against Epstein. That claim is pled in the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, filed on January 9, 2013, after was dismissed from Action #1. Rothstein is not a party to this separa ction. + +8. There is no question that Malicious Prosecution ell Ac itigal Epstein has been properly set for trial. Epstein does not even attempt to argue o e his spurious motion. + +9. The case law cited by Epstein is also factually ishable for the simple reason that all of the claims or counterclaims in those cases invo tk ame parties that were involved in the underlying complaint. + +10. For example, in Gawker Med. L Bollea 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), the case primarily relied upon by Epst laintiff, Bollea, sued multiple defendants, one of whom, Blogwire, contested Flori o arm-jurisdiction over it. After an initial unsuccessful attempt to sever the claims aga logwire and go forward with a trial on his claims against the remaining defendants, Bo smissed his claims against Blogwire with prejudice. He then filed an amended corn la seeking punitive damages against the remaining defendants and requested that the tri et the case for trial. Although none of the remaining defendants had answered the d complaint, the trial court set the case for trial. The defendants then sought a writ of mandamus in the appellate court, which granted the petition on the basis that the trial court's order setting the trial before the defendants answered the amended complaint violated Rule 1.440's requirement of a minimum of 50 days between service of the last pleading and commencement of trial. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +II. Gawker is simply inapplicable here. The Fourth Amended Counterclaim is an independent action filed after was dismissed from Action #1 (a necessary element to the Malicious Prosecution claim). The pleadings in Action #2, the Malicious Prosecution claim, have been closed for years, and it is undisputed that the case is at issue. is simply1 no longer a party to Action #1, having been dismissed from that Action long ago. Conte nag thatEdwards could notice Action #1 for trial is equivalent to saying that defendant Blog Gawker case could have noticed the case there for trial after having been dismiss fro a case. Therefore, Action #2 is more akin to a crossclaim, which is exempt fro 440. + +12. In any event, given that is arty to the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, he properly moved to notice that ca r . The Court granted that motion and entered its Order Specially Setting Trial on 7. The parties to Action #2, and Epstein, have proceeded under that vali for months and are ready to try Malicious Prosecution claim against Epste.ts, AC ct that Epstein has failed to pursue his claim against Rothstein in Action #1 is, to be H Iunts irrelevant. + +# Epstein's Counsel Continues to Knowingly Inject Privileged Materials '1- into the Public Record + +13. asks the Court to direct its attention to page 7 of Epstein's Motion to it Remov rom Trial Docket, in which Epstein's counsel again references privileged e-mail correspondence listed on 2011 Privilege Log. Both Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have been notified repeatedly that they are in possession of privileged materials listed on 2011 Privilege Log. Both have ignored requests to turn over or destroy that information. And it appears that they will continue to use these privileged materials without regard for their ethical obligations not to do so. + +adv. Epstein + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +14. Contemporaneous with this filing will be filing a Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance, et al, in which Epstein's counsel once again cites to privileged materials despite being on notice that these communications are on a 2011 privilege log and were never produced in this case. As the Court will see, Epst 's counsel has "jumped the shark" and are claiming to have evidence that Brad Edward we as other RRA attorneys and certain other individuals) were in fact knowingly invol Ponzi scheme. What the F.B.! and Justice Department missed in their y ng investigation into Rothstein's criminal enterprise, and their review of every aspe servers, Epstein and his counsel have possessed for y obtained it). overlooked (without explanation as t days before the scheduled start of trial. 's internal documents and explanation as to how they hy) for years. and have now found + +15. Obviously, Epstein's plo that he lacked probable cause to a. But Epstein will not a name and repu well. desperate attempt to avoid what is clearly the case: me or continue the underlying proceeding against s wrongdoing and is once again attempting to drag Brad hrough the mud, and this time wants to drag many others in as + +16. in and his counsel, however, benefit (so far) from Florida's absolute litigation privilege, prevents and the other victims from pursuing an independent tort claim for actions that occur in this proceeding. So, although the litigation privilege dooms Epstein on probable cause, it provides cover for his ridiculous and embarrassing claim to have found proof that (and apparently a host of others) were actually involved in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +### Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, Epstein's attempt to once again continue the Malicious Prosecution Action should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3b9f4d3a83dc926e6989a7f582088b82d8045b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471/EFTA02765471.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,428 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765471.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 11204, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ", _ \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION, REMOVE CASE FROM \nTRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATE SET FORTH IN \nRULE 1.440", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 319.1015625 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 319.1015625 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 370.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 370.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Action #1 \u2014 Epstein v. Rothstein (Second Amended Complaint)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 474.1640625, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 474.1640625, + 121.863037109375 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 121.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Action #2 \u2014 v. Epstein (Fourth Amended Counterclaim)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.57928466796875, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.57928466796875, + 120.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 120.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Counsel Continues to Knowingly Inject Privileged Materials \n'1- into the Public Record", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.6387939453125, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 487.6387939453125, + 522.8035278320312 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 522.8035278320312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 119.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 120.69 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765471" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..695ecb985a7eb9a5e28734a60383ed599a812c23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.md @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, individually, and c9s + +Defendants. + +## SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS C NTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED ON PRIVILEGE LOG + +Counter-Plaintiff M, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Supplement to his Motion to Strike Ep s Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to( bc Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log, and in support sta84: follows: + +- 1. On March 20"18, in the wake of extensive communications between counsel in this matter regarding the source of the untimely Supplemental Exhibits improperly obtained and publicly filed by Epstein, the undersigned received a hand-delivered communication from counsel for Epstein enclosing "a flash drive which duplicates the disc we located in files." +- 2. The enclosed flash drive contained three separate files respectively labeled: 1) a containing 8,507 pages of documents, 2) "Epstein Searches.pdf' containing 17,348 pages of documents, and 3) "Scott Rothstein.pdf' containing 1,687 pages of + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800X)OCXMBAG Supplement to Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strii, Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log + +documents. The format provided clear indication that these emails were obtained prior to= Jaffe Weissine Fistos & Lehrman reviewing and preparing a privilege log. In fact, the files were last modified on December 8, 2010, well before filed his 2011 Privilege Log. + +3. Upon further investigation, it has been determined that the docume is wrongfully in the possession of Epstein were originally formatted in the way described a y th law firm of Berger Singerman, as counsel for the Trustee of Rothstein Rosenfe d RRA") in the Federal Bankruptcy proceeding litigated before United States B cy ourt Judge Raymond B. Ray in case 09-34791. + +A 4. The subject documents were prepared by Bereer Singerman in that exact format for the sole purpose of allowing= Jaffe to review the documents in 2010 to determine whether applicable privileges applied to any or all of fI4 communications. See Judge Ray's Order below. + +5. It is also now clear where Epstein got the CD containing ' privileged materials. Specifically, on November 30;12010, Judge Ray entered an explicitly worded Order (attached as Exhibit 'A') concerning/the documents that Epstein is attempting to improperly use on the eve of trial. [DE 1194]. + +6. Judge Ray's Order states in pertinent part: + +[The law firm of Burnett P.A., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with numbers added, and will provide a set ofcopied, stamped documents to the Special and set to , who will use same to create its privilege log . . . will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall atir.in es or copies of said documents be retained • emory of copiers. Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Brad or his client. + +Supplement to Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log + +7. Epstein's counsel, [REDACTED], therefore disregarded Judge Ray's Order and Epstein's trial counsel failed to take reasonable and appropriate steps to determine where, when, and how the documents were obtained, instead choosing to inject clearly privileged materials into the public record and repeatedly refusing to destroy those identified on [REDACTED] 2011 Privilege Log. + +8. While Plaintiff fully intends to bring this flagrant disregard of the Federal Court's Order to the attention of Judge Ray as well as all other appropriate authorities and governing bodies, Plaintiff further moves this Court to take all necessary and appropriate action to adequately protect the confidential, privileged information contained within the documents discussed in [REDACTED] underlying Motion to Strike. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Supplement to Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +**ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on** 11-30-10 + +![](_page_4_Picture_102.jpeg) + +*Raymond B. Ray* + +**Raymond B. Ray, Judge +United States Bankruptcy Court** + +**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +*Fort Lauderdale Division* +[www.flsb.uscourts.gov](http://www.flsb.uscourts.gov)** + +IN RE: CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. + +**AGREED ORDER CANCELLING HEARING ON MOTION +FOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED ORDER (DE 1068) AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY +EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE +TO HIS REQUESTS FILED BY INTERESTED PARTY +██████████, JAFFE, WEISSING, ██████████, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.** + +The Motion for Relief From Amended Order (D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party ██████████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L ("██████████"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of ██████████, ██████████ Burnett, P.A., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with ██████████ numbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special ██████████ and an identical set to ██████████. + +![](_page_4_Picture_111.jpeg) + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +who will use same to create its privilege log. 1= - agrees to prepare that portion of the privilege log relating to emails on or before December 15, 2010, with the remaining portion due thirty days from the date of this order, subject to other courtaa= will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any im caes,or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of = = co ielould it be determined that=a or Epstein retained images or copies of subj ct documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to awa y ons in favor of=, Brad or his client. + +As such, the Motion for Relief is deemed m e hearing set on the Motion for Relief [D.E. 1146] set for November 30, 2010%c reby cancelled. The court reserves jurisdiction to tax fees and costs related to the preparation of the privilege log upon filing of a proper motion and hearing thereon. t e, + +# # # + +Submitted by: + +Seth Lehrman, Esq. , JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel.: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 sethri/Matlitoiustice.com + +Seth Lehrman, Esq. who is directed to serve this Order to all parties of interest and to file a Certificate of Service. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f79f496d1d3326c305310582f93c6d37c59c9695 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/EFTA02765478.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 8832, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.39, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_102.jpeg", + "_page_4_Picture_111.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY \nSUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY \nREFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS C NTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED \nON PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.276, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 532.5866088867188, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 532.5866088867188, + 377.60302734375 + ], + [ + 75.276, + 377.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 344.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER CANCELLING HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED ORDER (DE 1068) AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO HIS REQUESTS FILED BY INTERESTED PARTY \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588, JAFFE, WEISSING, \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 507.87 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765478" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_102.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_102.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c18078b478dffb1f6d1861ef62a4f78bb1284929 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_102.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8f6c512f6755d9873c1f44b98919ecd5bcd94a9f709b89f41fa6e7a9519e3fa5 +size 8547 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_111.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_111.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e5c034f76568a522582c595af58fc7b1a341ceb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765478/_page_4_Picture_111.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3354d1740409399b151d17592f8084b27c4c1a42355072816ac048f14d23bcca +size 7591 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c613085d3ce60acd0da77ec870d2856d5bd7b9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +• • Eir,113:: R.. + +(tr.: 117' '7 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ni FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND 2010 SEP 21 PM 3: FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +FILED CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant. + +Defendant, J. hereby states that the law offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. will be closed from December 23, 2010 through and including December 31, 2010, and respectfully request that no hearings, depositions, trials or any other matter involving the above-styled cause be stheduled during this time. + +## NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY + +I HEREBY CERTIFY ala true'and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the ed list on this air day of September 2010. + +Jack car a + +Florida Bar No.: 169448 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Defendant + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 727-2423 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0928062825c7afb4331c0d3b55a66b316c65bccb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484/EFTA02765484.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765484.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1866, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.524, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 395.5682678222656, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 395.5682678222656, + 322.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 214.524, + 322.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 127.17 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765484" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc1348c7fef53f39dfb4acc847ec75e9cc888932 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.md @@ -0,0 +1,683 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEF TEIN'S CROSS DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO ANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION ATIONS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey ("Epstein"), hereby files his cross designations and objections to Defen ;o ..., r Plaintiff J. Deposition Designations. + +## J,EG EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS + +BE Best Evid s ce oijr, S Speculation R R ance H Hearsay REP Cates Stipulation ti us 403 Rule 403 Prejudice ÷ VS LP Litigation Privilege A- Attorney-Client Privilege O Opinion IC Improper Cross P No Proper Predicate + +## OBJECTIONS + +## Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10) + +Epstein objects to the introduction of all questions and answers that assert Fifth Amendment. Epstein understands that the Court has ruled that some of the question and answers are admissible. Epstein raises those only here so to preserve the appellate record. + +## Jeffrey Epstein (1/25/121 + +| Designation | Epstein's Objection | Epstein's Cross Designation | +|-------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| +| 4:1-5:14 | 5:11-14 - R | | +| 8:9-9:9 | VS, R, 403, LP, A-C | | +| 18:14-18:17 | 0, LP | | +| 21:10-21:22 | VS, R, 403, LP, A-C | n | + +| 21:10-21:22 | VS, R, 403, LP, A-C n | +|-------------|-----------------------| +| J. | 3/23/10 tiw | +| Designation | Objecti | +| | Epstein's Objection | +| | to Cross | +| 7:17-8:23 | R C,JACIC) | +| 11:4-0 | g | +| 111 25 t | R | +| 12:2-3 | R | +| 20:16-23 | R | +| 21:1-23:2 | R | +| 23:21-24:17 | R | + +O + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|---------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 27:23-28:5 | | | | +| 29:3-17 | | | | +| 30:9-18 | | | | +| 31:10-15 | R | | | +| 31:20-23 | R | | | +| 36:6-16 | R | | | +| 38:18-24 | | | | +| 43:4-10 | R | | | +| 45:13-25 | R | | | +| | | 49:10-15 | | +| | | 49:17-22 | | +| | | 50:1-4 | | +| | | 51:22-52:14 | | +| 53:4-54:4 | R | | | +| 54:9-10 | R | | | +| 54:14-22 | R | | | +| 55:10-21 | R | | | +| 56:1-11 | | | | +| 56:20-23 | | | | +| 57:7-25 | R | | | +| 58:11-15 | R | | | +| 59:2-6 | | | | +| 60:4-23 | | | | +| 63:25-65:17 | 63:25-64:15 R | | | +| 67:1-68:17 | | | | +| 69:1-70:21 | | | | +| 71:11-72:13 | | | | +| 72:18-73:1 | | | | +| 74:8-12 | | | | +| 74:17-75:7 | | | | +| 75:18-76:3 | | | | +| 76:22-77:2 | | | | +| 78:9-22 | | | | +| | | 79:7-79:23 | | +| | | 80:9-16 | | +| | | 80:23-24 | | +| | | 81:16-20 | | +| | | 82:17-83:3 | | +| | | 83:8-22 | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|--------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 88:6-11 | | +| 107:11-112:1 | | | | +| 112:7-10 | | | | +| 112:12-114:10 | | | | +| 115:6-118:20 | | | | +| 118:23-120:22 | | | | +| | | 121:4-23 | | +| 122:24-123:24 | | | | +| 125:2-5 | | | | +| 125:14-19 | | | | +| 126:1-127:8 | 126:13-127:8 | | | +| 128:7-11 | | | | +| 128:16-129:7 | | | | +| 129:12-18 | | | | +| 129:20-132:18 | | | | +| 132:23-133:24 | | | | +| | | 137:1-7 | | +| | | 137:12-16 | | +| | | 138:1-14 | | +| | | 138:21-139:4 | | +| | | 141:7-9 | | +| | | 141:11-13 | | +| | | 141:15-16 | | +| | | 141:23-142:3 | | +| | | 146:4-16 | R, H, P, 403 | +| 153:2-3 | | | | +| 153:9-11 | | | | +| 153:13-20 | | | | +| 156:2-157:25 | R | | | +| | | 158:1-3 | | +| 158:4-160:2 | R | | | +| 162:21-163:7 | R | | | +| 164:21-166:1 | R | | | +| 166:22-167:5 | R | | | +| 174:24-175:16 | R | | | +| 175:22-176:4 | R | | | +| 180:5-20 | R | | | +| 182:5-25 | R | | | +| 183:16-184:3 | 183:16-20 | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-----------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 185:2-186:17 | R | | | +| 193:1-13 | | | | +| 197:14-18, 24 | R | | | +| 198:2-6 | R | | | +| | | 203:19-204:3 | R, 403 | +| | | 206:20-207:3 | R, 403 | +| | | 207:8-15 | R, 403 | +| 228:1-9 | | | | +| 228:12-13 | | | | +| 228:15-229:14 | R | | | +| 229:19-24 | R | | | +| 230:15-231:12 | | | | +| 231:23-232:2 | | | | +| 232:7-8 | | | | +| 232:10:00 | | | | +| 232:13-14 | | | | +| 232:21-233:6 | | | | +| 233:9-11 | | | | +| 233:13-234:6 | | | | +| 234:16-23 | R | | | +| 235:8-13 | | | | +| 235:15 | | | | +| 235:17-21 | R | | | +| 236:8-15 | R | | | +| 238:24-239:2 | | | | +| 239:18-243:21 | | | | +| 245:4-245:22 | | | | +| 246:12-247:11 | | | | +| 247:18-23 | | | | +| 248:22-249:7 | | | | +| 249:10-11 | | | | +| 249:13-252:6 | 252:1-6 R | | | +| | | 261:1-7 | | +| | | 263:7-264:7 | | +| 264:8-265:1 | | | | +| 265:3-7 | | | | +| 265:9-10 | | | | +| 276:3-11 | | | | +| 277:7-279:4 | | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|----------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 280:6-281:13 | | +| | | 282:6-9 | R, 403 | +| 283:5-284:2 | 283:10-284:2 R | | | +| 286:12-287:6 | R | | | +| 292:12-18 | | | | +| 303:11-22 | | | | + +**J. (10/10/13)** + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|----------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 113:7-25 | | +| | | 117:9-21 | R, 403, REP | +| | | 125:9-11 | 403, R, BE | +| 130:12-25 | COL, R, C | | | +| 132:25-133:10 | | | | +| | | 133:11-13 | S | +| | | 134:5-7 | REP | +| 134:23-137:22 | | | | +| | | 138:12-139:1 | S, BE, H, 403 | +| 139:6-22 | R, LP | | | +| | | 140:24-141:12 | H, 403, R | +| | | 141:23-142:25 | H, 403, R | +| 143:1-144:9 | 143:1-20 R, LP | | | +| | | 144:19-145:16 | R, S, 403, H | +| 152:11-153:14 | R, LP | | | +| 205:9-22 | R, LP | | | +| 206:10-207:8 | | | | +| | | 207:9-208:1 | BE, H, 403 | +| | | 208:7-209:13 | 403, H, R, S | +| | | 215:18-24 | S, H | +| | | 216:11-14 | H, S | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|--------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 5:1-6:9 | | +| 8:15-9:15 | | | | +| 11:15-25 | | | | +| 12:1-19 | 12:17-12:19 C | | | +| 12:22-13:14 | | | | +| 21:3-22:17 | 21:8-22:4 C | | | +| 23:4-28:18 | 23:17-23:18 C | | | +| | 25:17-26:25 R, O, I, 403 | | | +| | 27:1-28:5 R, 403 | | | +| 28:25-30:2 | 29:1-13 O, R, 403 | | | +| 30:12-31:2 | | | | +| 32:12-15 | | | | +| 32:21-33:17 | | | | +| 33:23-38:12 | 35:12-18 O, R, 403 | | | +| | 36:15-19 O, COL | | | +| | 37:1-5 O, COL | | | +| | 37:19-20 O, COL | | | +| | 37:24-39:1 O, A, C | | | +| 38:20-39:1 | | | | +| 39:11-40:21 | | | | +| 40:24-41:4 | | | | +| 41:9-42:19 | | | | +| 42:22-44:13 | 43:13-44:25 O, 403, II | | | +| 44:19-46:8 | 45:1-46:8 O, 403, II | | | +| 46:24-47:14 | O, R | | | +| 48:15-49:8 | 48:15-25 O, R | | | +| | 49:1-14 O, R, 403 | | | +| 49:13 | | | | +| 50:3-53:23 | O, R, 403 | | | +| 54:13-20 | O, R, 403, II | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|----------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 54:22-61:1 | 54:22-56:9 O, R, 403, II | | | +| 61:16-63:12 | | | | +| 64:6-65:24 | | | | +| 66:3-15 | | | | +| 67:9-68:7 | 67:17-68:7 O, R, 403 | | | +| 68:12 | O, R, 403 | | | +| 68:15-75:25 | 68:15-69:21 O, R, 403 | | | +| 76:13-77:23 | | | | +| 78:3-6 | | | | +| 78:20-79:3 | | | | +| 79:6-15 | | | | +| 80:8-83:14 | | | | +| 83:19-86:2 | | | | +| 87:4-19 | | | | +| 88:7-19 | | | | +| 88:22-89:23 | | | | +| 91:1-19 | | | | +| 91:23-92:5 | | | | +| 92:15-23 | O, H | | | +| 94:4-6 | H | | | +| 94:11-19 | | | | +| 94:24-97:9 | 96:3-97:9 O, H | | | +| 97:19-101:7 | 97:19-98:23 O, H, R, 403 | | | +| | 99:1-100:25 H, R, 403 | | | +| | 101:1-101:7 O, R, H, 403 | | | +| 101:16-103:2 | 101:16-102:24 O, R, H, 403 | | | +| 103:12-23 | | | | +| 104:2-105:2 | 104:24-105:2 O, C | | | +| 105:7-106:19 | 105:7-106:7 O, R | | | +| | | 106:20-22 | R | +| | | 108:23-110:3 | R, 403, H | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|---------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 110:16-22 | | | | +| 111:7-112:6 | | | | +| 112:11-16 | | | | +| 112:18-114:5 | 112:21-25 O, H | | | +| | 113:1-114:2 O, H, R, 403 | | | +| 114:12-116:25 | 115:7-116:25 O, H, R, 403 | | | +| 117:2-21 | O, H, R, 403 | | | +| 120:5-121:13 | 120:19-121:13 O, H, R | | | +| 122:24-123:5 | O, H, R | | | +| 123:8-22 | O, H, R | | | +| 123:24-124:22 | O, H, R | | | +| 125:4-24 | 125:16-24 O, H, SHK | | | +| 126:2-10 | O, H, R | | | +| 126:14-128:4 | O, H, R | | | +| 128:7-23 | O, H, R | | | +| 134:14-135:18 | | | | +| 135:23-24 | | | | +| 136:2-7 | | | | +| 136:15-138:24 | 137:25-138:12 O, R, A-C | | | +| 139:11-144:13 | | | | +| 145:2-4 | | | | +| 147:3-151:10 | O, R | | | +| 151:21-167:2 | 151:21-156:25 O, R | | | +| | 157:1-166:15 O, R, H | | | +| 167:21-176:23 | 168:11-170:17 O, R | | | +| | 171:1-9 O, R, H | | | +| | 172:5-174:25 O, R, 403 | | | +| | 175:1-3 O, C | | | +| | 175:1-176:23 O, R, 403 | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|----------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 177:8-179:20 | O, R, 403 | | | +| 181:12-183:23 | | | | +| 184:7-23 | | | | +| 184:25-185:25 | 185:9-25 O, C, II | | | +| 189:3-193:13 | 189:3-190:20 O, R | | | +| | 191:12-192:9 O, R | | | +| 193:18-195:25 | 193:18-20 O, C | | | +| | 194:5-17 O, R, 403 | | | +| 196:12-15 | | | | +| 197:13-15 | O, C | | | +| 198:23-25 | O, C | | | +| 199:2-200:1 | O, R | | | +| 201:5-203:14 | 202:16-18 O, C | | | +| 203:19-204:1 | | | | +| 204:5-205:13 | | | | +| 205:15-207:2 | | | | +| 207:22-214:11 | 212:5-25 O, R, 403 | | | +| | 213:8-14 O, C | | | +| | 213:1-214:11 O, R, A | | | +| 214:14-20 | O, R, A | | | +| 214:22-215:12 | O, R, A | | | +| 215:20-216:3 | 215:25-216:3 O, A | | | +| 216:9-17 | 216:9-10 O, A | | | +| 217:9-218:20 | O, R, 403 | | | +| 218:23-220:16 | R | | | +| 220:22-223:5 | 220:22-25 R | | | +| | 221:1-222:25 R, 403 | | | +| | 223:1-5 R | | | +| 223:12-19 | R | | | +| 224:15-225:19 | 224:15-25 R | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | 225:1-19 O, R, A | | | +| | | 225:20 | R, 903, 5th Am, H | +| | | 225:25-227:5 | R, 903, 5th Am, H | +| 227:7-10 | O, R | | | +| 228:9-229:10 | O, R | | | +| 229:16-23 | O, R | | | +| 230:22-231:19 | 230:22-231:15 O, R, H | | | +| | 231:16-19 O, C | | | +| 234:20-235:1 | O, R | | | +| 237:19-238:7 | O, R | | | +| 238:14-239:24 | O, R | | | +| 241:5-242:4 | | | | +| 243:14-244:23 | 243:22-244:23 O, R, A, (IC), C | | | +| 245:15-246:14 | | | | +| 247:8-18 | 247:16-18 COL | | | +| 248:21-249:25 | 249:9-10 C | | | +| 250:10-24 | R | | | +| 253:2-258:7 | 256:9-25 R, 403 | | | +| | 258:5-7 R | | | +| 258:18-268:19 | 258:25-261:9 R | | | +| | 262:16-268:19 R | | | +| 276:24-277:24 | A | | | +| 278:14-15 | A | | | +| 288:10-23 | 288:10-13 R | | | +| 289:15-22 | R | | | +| 289:25-292:25 | | | | +| 294:6-1 | | | | +| 297:6-300:21 | 298:18-300:21 R | | | +| 303:24-304:22 | R | | | +| 304:23-305:10 | 305:8-305:10 R | | | +| 305:11-307:2 | R | | | +| | | 307:2-308:16 | R, 403, BE | +| | | 310:13-312:15 | REP, S, 403 | +| | | 312:24-313:11 | R, 403, H | +| | | 313:17-321:8 | R, 403, H | +| 321:9-322:2 | | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-----------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 322:3-325:15 | S, R, H | +| 325:22-326:1 | | | | +| 326:16-327:6 | | | | +| | | 327:7-23 | 403, R | +| 327:24-328:14 | | | | +| | | 329:9-25 | BE, 403, IC, R | +| 330:1-332:24 | | | | +| 333:11-339:7 | | | | + +**Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)** + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Epstein's Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-----------|-----------------------------| +| 4:1-5:16 | | | +| 5:23-6:4 | | | +| 8:7-8:18 | | | +| 12:13-15:8 | | | +| 17:13-17:21 | | | +| 18:19-19:15 | | | +| 19:24-21:4 | | | +| 21:17-22:9 | | | +| 22:22-24:19 | | | +| 36:22-43:4 | | | +| 44:10-45:1 | | | +| 45:18-46:4 | | | +| 53:20-54:1 | | | +| 56:11-57:2 | | | +| 62:20-63:12 | | | +| 70:21-71:3 | | | +| 114:2-114:15 | | | +| 121:3-122:15 | | | +| 122:23-124:7 | R, 403, P | | + +**Kretschmar (2/11/11)** + +| Designation | Epstein's Objection | Epstein's Cross Designation | +|-------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| +| 72:18-73:25 | H | Entire Transcript | +| 74:17-19 | | | +| 74:23-25 | | | + +**S. Adler (4/20/11)** + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Edwards' Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| | | 4:8-11 | | +| 4:14-5:12 | | | | +| 11:11-23 | | | | +| 12:16-14:14 | | | | +| 14:20-18:6 | 17:15-18:5 C | | | +| 18:20-20:1 | | | | +| 23:4-25:7 | 23:16-24:11 II, R, 403 | | | +| | 25:2-7 403 | | | +| 25:21-27:10 | 25:21-26:8 403 | | | +| | 26:21-22 403 | | | +| 27:14-21 | | | | +| 30:10-32:17 | | | | +| 32:24-33:4 | 32:24-33:1 (No Answer) | | | +| | 33:2-4 C | | | +| 35:9-17 | 403 | | | +| 38:18-41:18 | | | | +| 42:13-43:22 | R | | | +| 44:1-47:8 | 44:1-44:19 R | | | +| | 45:11-46:16 R | | | +| 53:15-56:21 | R | | | +| 57:5-58:14 | | | | +| 63:10-25 | | 66:1-6 | H | +| | | 65:15-66:6 | R, H | +| | | 66:11-20 | H, R | +| | | 72:13-73:1 | R | +| 73:14-74:15 | | | | +| 77:21-78:4 | | | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 78:6-17 | | | | +| 78:23-79:14 | | | | +| 79:24-81:15 | | | | +| 82:13-83:18 | | | | +| 83:25-86:5 | | | | +| 86:15-87:12 | | | | +| 89:10-90:15 | | | | +| 93:25-95:12 | | | | +| 96:1-8 | | | | +| 99:23-100:21 | | | | +| 101:19-102:7 | 403 | | | +| 103:12-104:21 | | | | +| 106:4-23 | R | | | +| 106:25-107:4 | R | | | +| 107:15-23 | R | | | +| 108:1-5 | 108:1-3 R
108:4-5 R, 403 | | | +| 115:6-120:9 | | | | +| 121:8-123:17 | | | | +| 124:20-126:14 | | | | +| | | 151:22-152:22 | R, 403 | + +**A.J. Discala (5/25/11)** + +| Edwards' Designation | Epstein's Objection | Epstein's Cross Designation | +|----------------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| +| 28:5-20 | | | +| 28:25-29:15 | | | +| 30:5-25 | R, H | | +| 87:22-88:13 | | 88:14-16 | +| 88:22-89:2 | | | +| 89:14-17 | | | +| 90:8-23 | R | | +| 91:21-92:11 | | | +| 93:21-94:2 | R | | +| 99:24-100:6 | R | | +| 101:5-11 | R | | +| 103:10-14 | R | | +| 107:7-108:3 | R | | + +| Designation | Epstein's Objection | Epstein's Cross Designation | +|---------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| +| 116:11-13 | S, R | | +| 116:15 | S, R | | +| 127:6-128:12 | R, BE, H | | +| 128:24-129:11 | | | +| 134:20-135:2 | R, H | | +| 136:6-12 | | | +| 141:7-16 | | | +| 142:11-13 | | | +| 150:21-151:8 | R, H | | +| 152:18-153:5 | R, H | | +| 153:11-154:14 | | | +| 155:12-25 | R, H | | +| 156:7-16 | R, H, BE | | +| 158:11-159:11 | R, H, 403 | | +| 160:24-161:5 | H, BE | | +| 161:10-11 | H, R, 403 | | +| 161:17-22 | H, R, 403 | | +| 180:22-182:2 | R, 403, H | | +| 184:2-11 | R, 403, H | | +| 184:19-185:11 | R, 403, H | | +| 206:10-11 | R, 403, H | | +| 206:13 | R, 403, H | | +| 206:20-207:6 | | | +| 207:17-207:24 | | | +| 213:2-213:16 | | | +| 271:2-15 | R, 403, H | | +| 285:21-23 | R, H | | +| 285:25-286:2 | R, H | | +| 286:4-11 | R, H | | +| 286:13-18 | | 286:20-21 | +| 286:20-287:7 | 403 | | +| 287:24-288:2 | | | +| 288:4-7 | R | | +| 288:17-18 | R | | +| 290:4-16 | | | +| 290:21-23 | | | +| 308:19-309:4 | R | | +| 326:21-25 | | | +| 327:15-328:3 | | | +| 328:11-18 | R, 403 H | | + +| Designation | Epstein's Epstein's Cross Objection Designation | +|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 329:15-330:9 | R, 403 H | +| 330:16-331:3 | R, 403 H | +| 331:10-332:4 | R, 403 H | +| 332:10-22 | R, 403 H | +| 333:2-5 | R, 403 H | +| 333:9-20 | R, 403 H | +| 340:12-18 | R, 403 H | +| 345:19-23 368:22-24 369:3-23 | R, 403 H | + +# E.W. (10/12/171 + +| | Epstein's Objection | +|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Designation | Objection | +| Epstein's 5:3-11:22 | to Cross Designation 5:21-6:25 R, 403 II 7:1-24 R, II 8:5-6 R, II 8:12-1 1a* | +| 14:10-18 | R, Ie | +| 14:21-15:12 | R, II, | +| 15:15-16:2 | II, 403 | +| 16:7-10 | „ 403 | +| 16:14-18 | , II, 403 | +| 17:18- | 6 R, II, 403 | +| 20. | R, II, 403 | +| 26: | R, II, 403 | +| : - 9:4 | R, II, 403 | +| 34. -16 | R, II, 403 | +| 34:18-35:6 | R, II, 403 40:8-25 41:1-10 | +| 45:3-47:19 | 45:3-25 R, 403 46:1-47:19 R, II, | +| 47:23-49:21 51:13-21 | R, II, 403 | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 53:14-54:15 | R, II, 403 | | | +| 54:17-56:8 | R, II, 403 | | | +| 56:21-57:3 | R, II, 403 | | | +| 57:9-13 | | | | +| 57:15-58:9 | 58:5-9 R, II, 403 | | | +| | | 58:10-58:21 | | +| | | 59:3-59:17 | R, 403, P | +| | | 61:7-61:15 | | +| | | 65:20-66:3 | | +| | | 66:18-67:15 | | +| 86:8-22 | | | | +| 91:14-92:10 | R, (M), 403 | | | +| | | 100:10-101:4 | | +| | | 102:1-102:10 | | +| | | 103:4-103-16 | | +| | | 105:6-105:18 | | +| 108:21-109:2 | | | | +| | | 109:5-109:11 | | +| | | 109:21-109:23 | | +| | | 111:22-111:25 | | +| | | 112:20-113:2 | | +| | | 113:10-113:15 | | +| | | 115:24-116:5 | | +| | | 116:8-116:15 | | +| 116:16-22 | | | | +| 117:7-118:7 | | | | +| 120:6-23 | | | | +| 121:6-122:23 | 121:6-19 R, (C) | | | +| | 121:20-122:3 (P) | | | +| | 122:4-14 (C), (P) | | | +| 123:8-124:23 | 124:1-23 (C), R | | | +| | | 125:3-125:6 | | +| | | 125:8-125:11 | | +| | | 125:13-125:16 | | +| | | 125:18-125:21 | | +| | | 125:23 | | +| | | 125:25-126:21 | | +| | | 128:21-128:25 | | +| | | 129:2 | | + +| Epstein's Designation | Objection | Cross Designation | Epstein's Objection to Cross Designation | +|-----------------------|-----------|-------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | | 129:4-129:5 | | +| | | 129:7-129:9 | | +| | | 129:11-129:14 | | +| | | 129:16-129:19 | | +| | | 129:21-129:24 | | +| | | 130:1-130:4 | | +| | | 130:6-130:12 | | +| | | 130:14-130:17 | | +| | | 130:19-130:20 | | +| | | 130:22-130:23 | | +| | | 130:25-132:7 | | +| | | 132:9-135:1 | | +| | | 135:6-135:18 | | +| | | 135:20-137:24 | | +| | | 138:1-138:2 | | +| | | 138:5-138:13 | | +| | | 139:12-140:10 | | +| | | 140:15-140:19 | | +| | | 141:23-142:1 | | +| | | 142:10-142:13 | | +| | | 142:15-143:11 | | +| | | 143:18-144:21 | | +| | | 145:5-145:9 | | +| | | 145:11-145:16 | | +| | | 145:18-145:21 | | +| | | 146:10-146:13 | | +| | | 146:17-146:24 | | +| | | 147:2-148:8 | | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 7, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards | Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84b3140fd6197ae938d2248eefe69e4c2771b5ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486/EFTA02765486.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,841 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765486.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 20, + "chars": 65443, + "elapsed_seconds": 12.31, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEF TEIN'S CROSS \nDESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO ANT/COUNTER-\nPLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION ATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 492.66851806640625, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 492.66851806640625, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "J,EG EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 419.92108154296875, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 419.92108154296875, + 465.363037109375 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 465.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 348.38232421875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 348.38232421875, + 86.5946044921875 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 86.5946044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 200.51141357421875, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 200.51141357421875, + 113.974609375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 113.974609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein (1/25/121", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 201.4828643798828, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 201.4828643798828, + 210.3446044921875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 210.3446044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 267.3 + ], + [ + 200.124, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 283.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Kretschmar (2/11/11)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.67 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "S. Adler (4/20/11)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 221.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A.J. Discala (5/25/11)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 484.37999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. (10/12/171", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 157.4100341796875, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 157.4100341796875, + 297.570556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 297.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 456.8399999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765486" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39dc07be1289ae56bf9020782b302e32b45c7c09 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.md @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE b IN bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800VOCGABAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E AFFIDAVIT OF TIMOTHY P. S NOTICE OF FILING S + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein of the attached Affidavit of Timothy P. Chinaris. hereby gives notice of the filing + +### CERTIFIC RVICE + +I certify that the foregoing d Service List below on March 7, 201 of Judicial Administration 2.516 been furnished to the attorneys listed on the e Court's 0-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kp lit clwcom Primary: Angela@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: TanyaO,1inIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

VIA EMAIL
Paul Cassell

| + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800>DCXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +O SA + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. C + +## AFFIDAVIT OF TI1k4.CHINARIS + +BEFORE ME personally appeared TIMO . ARIS, affiant, and, being duly sworn, did say and aver the following: + +## PROFESSIO GROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS + +- 1. My name is Timothy P. ris. +- 2. I am a reside of th S te of Tennessee, residing in Nolensville, Tennessee. +- 3. I am Florida Bar rim +- 4. IAyprdttssional qualifications and experience are set forth in my curriculum vitae, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The contents of said curriculum vitae are true and accurate. icensed in the State of Florida and a member in good standing of The +- 5. I was employed by The Florida Bar in Tallahassee, Florida from August 1986 to April 1997. From 1986-to-1989; my position•was-Assistant Ethics Counsel7From-December-1989.to-April 1997, I was Ethics Director of The Florida Bar. +- 6. As Ethics Director, I was responsible for operation of The Florida Bar's Ethics Department. The Ethics Department employs licensed Florida attorneys whose duties include providing oral and + +v. + +- 10. From. September 2000 to June 2005 I was Grundy, Virginia as Associate Professor of La duties included teaching courses in legal eth' +- 11. From June 2005 through Marc of Law in Alabama, legal ethics, as we as okS adr 2011 to 2014; Associate f +- 7. As. Ethics Director of The Florida Bar, my responsibilities included: hiring, training, and supervising the Ethics Department's attorneys; providing oral and written advisory ethics opinions to practicing attorneys; advising The Florida Bar Board of Governors on issues of professional ethics; serving as counsel to ethics-related Florida Bar committees; consulting with attorneys in The Florida Bar's Lawyer. Regulation Department, Unlicensed Practice of Law Department, and Center for Professionalism regarding cases, advisory opinions, and programs; speaking to 1 , state, and national groups on matters of legal ethics; and writing about professional responsi r matters for various publications. +- 8. During my employment with The Florida Bar, I personally render ethics opinions to practicing Florida attorneys on a wide variety of matC ad professional responsibility. +- 9. From April 1997 to September 2000, I was employed Jacksonville, Florida as Associate Professor of Law and A and Technology. My duties included teaching courses ,i% 45 s of advisory ing legal ethics da Coastal School of Law in for Information Resources yaalachian School of Law in ' tant of Information Resources. My employed by Faulkner University's School of Law. My duties included teaching courses in e positions (Associate for Academic Affairs from ation Resources from 2005 to 2012). +- 12. Since April 2014 I. en employedSBelmont University College of Law in Nashville, Tennessee, as Profe r of w and Associate for Academic Affairs. My duties include teaching courses i al eth cs, as well as administering the law school's academic program. +- 13. Duri ployment as Florida Bar Ethics Director or since leaving the Bar's employ, I have: advis rs on issues relating to various aspects of legal ethics, including confidentiality and dut e mg receipt of potentially confidential documents; advised lawyers and others on unlicensed ctice of law issues; advised lawyers on legal malpractice issues; represented lawyers in various professional responsibility matters, including Florida Bar disciplinary cases; and consulted and testified as an expert on various legal ethics and professional responsibility issues, including in Florida Bar disciplinary cases. +- 14. I am a member of the Professional Ethics Committee of The Florida Bar, having served on that Committee trom1997•to 2003,1mm:200610 2012,;and frOm 2017,-present. Ithaired.the Professional Ethics Committee from 2002 to 2003. I.am a member of the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Professionalism, and chaired that Committee from 2016-2017. I have twice served + +written advisory opinions to practicing Florida Bar members on ethics-related topics. The Ethics Department annually renders thousands of ethics and advertising opinions to Florida lawyers. + +as President of The Florida Bar Out of State Division. I previously served as Vice-chair of The Florida Bar Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law, and as a member of The Florida Bar Special Committee to Review the ABA Model Rules 2002, The Florida Bar Vision 2016 Commission and The Florida Bar Attorney-Client Privilege Task Force. I am or have been a member of state bar rules or unauthorized practice of law committees in Alabama and Virginia. + +15. I regularly write and speak on legal ethics topics. I developed and maintain the legal ethics website "sunEthics.com" (http://www.sunethics.com). I co-authored the treatise Florida Legal Malpractice and Attorney Ethics. + +16. I have consulted and testified in state and federal court matters, arbitrati Florida Bar disciplinary matters as an expert witness on a variety of professio issues, including confidentiality and and duties regarding receipt of potent documents, conflicts of interest, disqualification, attorney's fees, legal unauthorized practice of law. ings, and ponsibility ential and + +17. I consult with and represent practicing attorneys and o responsibility and legal ethics. ding issues of professional + +18. In connection with this matter, I have s Rockenbach, P.A., counsel for Mr. Epstein i by the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, P Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion f Documents and Request for Additi of Special =, with attack= Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's No E.W., and Jane Doe, or Defendan Records Until the Court of No Objection"). 9dditid opinions. cott Link and Kara Rockenbach of Link & er, and reviewed documents provided to me ng but not limited to: PlaintiffiCounter-Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of d Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment on for Court to Declare"); and Plaintiff/Countero Objection to Attomeilliiiassell, on Behalf of L.M., unter-Plaintiff J. Moving to Seal Court Determination on How the Documents Shall Be Treated ("Notice y, I have reviewed relevant Rules of Professional Conduct and ethics + +### OPERATIVE FACTS + +19. hs 20. through 28. summarize the operative facts, as I understand them, that I have considered forming my opinions. + +20. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein has been represented by various counsel in the course of this case. Mr. Epstein's current counsel, Link & Rockenbach, P.A.,\_appeared in this case onNovember 1, 2017. + +21. In•the course of is pm tib Link &Rockenbabh contacted Epstein's pnor counsel; Burnett, P.A. ( '), and requested file materials relating to this case. had 36 file boxes on this case at its Miami office. was not willing to release the boxes and, accordingly, Link & Rockenbach, through Scott Link and paralegal Tina flagged items to be copied. Included within the 36 boxes was a disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp," which Link & Rockenbach flagged for copying. + +22. Around February 1, 2018, Link .& Rockenbach received 3 boxes from M, which contained the items that had been flagged for copying. Link & Rockenbach's arale al assigned to the case, Tina was on vacation when the boxes arrived. When returned to the office on February 12, 2018, she started reviewing the materials. Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach did not begin reviewing the documents on the disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" unti he week of February 26, 2018. + +23. The "Epstein Bate Stamp" disc contains more than 27,000 M-stam ges, with no confidentiality designations. There was no cover letter or other designatio entiality. Some of the documents had been marked as exhibits. + +24. Approximately 25,000-21000 , documents were produced non-privileged documents. Mr. testified regarding p stating that the documents had been turned over. Mr. Link believed that testimony related to the docume ands to Mr. Epstein as at his deposition in 2013, ockenbach reasonably pstein Bate Stamp" disc. + +25. Mr. also produced documents to (Razorback), which Mr. Link and Ms. Rocken claim of confidentiality. & Scherer law firm in other litigation ably believed were produced without a + +26. Upon reviewing documents o Ms. Rockenbach that some of th issues in this case and may con Party in Bate Stamp" disc, it appeared to Mr. Link and contained information that is extremely relevant to ony and positions taken in the case by the opposing + +27. Before filing the M for Court to Declare, Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach reviewed the court files in this d ir tee bankruptcy proceeding involving the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler firm, asked Mr. s' counsel whether there were any confidentiality orders concerning trial exhibits, revie wards' testimony regarding document production, asked Fowler ieaneral co pies of any relevant confidentiality orders or stipulations, spoke with attom reviewed the 36 boxes a second time. + +28. Wh filing the Motion for Court to Declare, the identities of potentially sensitive individuals who are represented by attorney Paul Cassell were redacted. Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have filed the Notice of No Objection to show that they will not object if. Mr. Caccell seeks to have the court seal this portion of the file. + +## MY OPINIONS IN THIS MATTER + +29. As described more filly below, it is my opinion that Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have acted in an ethically proper manner in this case regarding the documents in question. + +30. It is my opinion that the documents in question were not inadvertently provided to or wrongfully obtained by Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach. + +- a. The documents were on a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that was obtained in the ordinary course of trial mr aration by Link & Rockenbach from their client's prior counsel, the respected firm of +- b. It reasonably appeared to Mr. Link and Ms. Rockebach that these documents had been produced to prior counsel and were not the subject of a confidentiality agleement or order. +- c. For purposes of a lawyer's ethical obligations, a document is in "when it is accidentally transmitted, such as when an e-mail or le document or electronically stored information is accidentally in was intentionally transmitted." Comment, Rule 44.4, Rules Under the circumstances, nothing reasonably suggested to Mr. that the documents were inadvertently provided or tha t y provided dressed or a information that gulating The Florida Bar. inkiand Ms. Rockenbach been wrongfully obtained. + +31. It is my opinion that Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenb bringing the documents in question to the court's atte ethically proper manner by + +- a. Even if the documents had been opinion, is not the situation here), th limited one: to bring the matter Rules Regulating The Florida Rockenbach have done that when they obtain docum my opinion, is not the si a result of inadvertence (which, in my igation of the recipient lawyers would be a on of opposing counsel. See Rule 44.(b), a Ethics Opinion 93-3. Mr. Link and Ms. limited response by recipient lawyers is required ve wrongfully come into a client's possession (which, in ere). See Florida Ethics Opinion 07-1. +- b. Further, ev dvertent disclosure situations, a lawyer who believes that any privilege rela • g to le documents has been waived or is otherwise inapplicable acts in an ethically a riate manner by seeking direction from the court on those questions. See Comm u -4.4, Rules Regulating The:Florida Bar ("Whether the lawyer is required to take steps, such as returning the document or electronically stored information, is a w beyond the scope of these rules, as is the question of whether the privileged document or electronically stored information has been waived."). That is what and Ms. Rockenbach have done. +- c. Finally, lawyers for all parties have an ethical obligation not to knowingly use or perniit the use of improper testimonynr other evidence in a court proceeding. See Rule 4- 3.3;Rules-Regulating-Theflorida-BarrBybringing thismatter to-the court's attention, Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have shown proper respect for the court and for the principles underlying Rule 4-3.3. + +Further affiant sayeth not. + +![](_page_7_Picture_12.jpeg) + +STATE OF TENNESSEE + +COUNTY OF DAVIDSON + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7th day of March 2018 by TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS, who is personally known to me or who has produced valid identification and who did take an oath. + +![]()TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS + +NOTARY + +Commission Expires : 11/5/18 + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS + +Post Office Box 120186 Nashville, Tennessee 37212 (615) 460-8264 + +## EDUCATION + +M.S. in Library and Information Studies, Florida State University, 1996 + +J.D. With Honors, University of Texas at Austin, 1984 + +B.S. Cum Laude in Business Administration, Florida State University,C ) + +## EMPLOYMENT + +Associate for Academic Affairs and Prof (2014-Present), Belmont University College of Law Nashville, es + +Assist law school with administratiotV demic program, including: planning and scheduling course offerings; malcingiteachinpassignments; hiring adjunct instructors; overseeing exam administration and gradepreporting; administering academic counseling, dismissals, leaves of absence, faculty orientation; and pm Additional responsibilit committee service, pub d transfers; assisting with new student orientation and new \*istics for and submissions to accrediting organizations. teaching (legal ethics, insurance law, other subjects), d speaking. + +Associate for Aca ffairs (2011-2014 and Professor of Law (2005-2014), Faulkner Universi Jon School of Law Alabama + +Assisted with administration of academic program. Taught courses in legal ethics Q• n law, and antitrust law. s + +r Associate Information Resources (2005-2012 and Professor of Law (2005-2014), Faulltn ersity, School of Law Alabama + +Di ted law school information resources operations. Taught courses in legal ethics and other subjects. + +Assistant of Information Resources and Associate Professor of Law, Appalachian School of Law Grundy, Virginia 2000-2005 + +Directed law school library and information resources operations. Taught courses in legal ethics, criminal procedure, law office practice, and legal process. Faculty responsibilities included chairing and serving on various committees. + +Associate M, Information Resources and Technology and Associate Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law Jacksonville, Florida 1998-2000 + +Directed all law school computing, instructional technology, telecommunications, and library operations. Taught courses in legal ethics. Faculty responsibilities included committee service and advising the school's law review. + +Director of Library and Technology Center and Assistant Professor of Law, + +Florida Coastal School of Law Jacksonville, Florida 1997-1998 + +Directed library operations. Taught courses in legal ethics. + +Ethics Director, The Florida Bar Tallahassee, Florida 1989-1997 + +Director of program that provided advisory opinions to Florida lawyers a 'cs and advertising issues. Duties included: hiring, training, and supervising ttorneys; speaking to local, state, and national groups on professional respo ues; advising the Bar's Board of Governors and Bar committees; and writing J . ublications. + +Assistant Ethics Counsel, The Florida Bar Tallahassee, Florida -1989 + +Duties included providing written and oral advisory o inions to Florida lawyers on legal ethics, professional responsibility, and lawyer adve is es, speaking to various groups, and writing articles on professional responsibili + +Godwin & Carlton, P.C. Dallas, Texas 198 + +Associate in commercial litigation secti #ej practice law firm. + +Texas Court of Appeals Dallas, Tex + +Research Attorney for Justices Court of Appeals. The 13-j tewart and Ted M. Akin, Fifth Judicial District rt was the largest appellate court in Texas. + +Texas Court of Appeals D as 1984 + +Briefing Attorney for Ju ed M. Akin, Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals. + +Unisys Corporation Ta ahissee, Florida and Dallas, Texas 1978-81 + +Branch Fi t dal M nager for worldwide computer equipment and software company. + +### O TED PUBLICATIONS + +Author of legal ethics web site "sunEthics.com" (www.sunethics.com). + +FLORIDA LEGAL ETHICS (West Academic Publishing, forthcoming 2020) (with Robert Jarvis). + +FLORIDA LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND ATTORNEY ETHICS (American Legal Media, 2017) (with Trazenfeld and Robert Jarvis). + +We Are Who We Admit: The Need to Harmonize Law School Admission and Professionalism Processes with Bar Admission Standards, 31 MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 43 (2012). + +"New Directions in Professionalism," report prepared for the Florida Bar Center for Professionalism, August 2009. + +FLORIDA ETHICS GUIDE FOR LEGAL ASSISTANTS AND ATTORNEYS WHO UTILIZE LEGAL ASSISTANTS (4th ed., Fla. Bar Continuing Legal Education, 2006). + +Even Judges Don't Know Everything: A Call for a Presumption of Admissibility for pert Witness Testimony in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings, 36 ST. MARY'S LAW JOURNAL 825 ( 5). + +More Than the Camel's Nose: The Sarbanes=Act as Bad News for La Clie1 ts, and the Public, 31 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 359 (2005). + +Chapter on "Ethics, Professionalism, and Discovery" in VIRGINIA DI OVE 4,'primarily authored by Jeffrey Kinsler (West Publishing 2005). + +Primary drafter, Florida Bar lawyer advertising rules (1999 + +Florida Professional Responsibility in 1999: The Ru (Fall 1999), co-authored with Elizabeth Clark T ante, 24 NOVA LAW REVIEW 199 + +Professional Responsibility: 1998 Survey of etcri co-authored with Elizabeth ClarkTarbert w, 23 NOVA LAW REVIEW 161 (Fall 1998), + +The Ethics of Ethics Consultation: ulted Lawyer's Perspective, THE PROFESSIONAL LAWYER, 1997 Symposium Issu + +Florida Professional Responstb authored with Elizabeth Tarbert. w in 1997,22 NOVA LAW REVIEW 215 (Fall 1997), co- + +Professional Resp ability 1996 Survey of Florida Law, 21 NOVA LAW REVIEW 231 (Fall 19%). + +Professional si ility in Florida: The Year in Review, 1995,20 NOVA LAW REVIEW 223 (Fall 1995). + +"Ethics A March 6, 2001. w: High-Impact Teaching of Legal Ethics," featured on the front page of law.com, + +Answers to Frequently-Asked Ethics Questions, 65 FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL 49 (January 1991). + +Contributing Author, FLORIDA LEGAL ETHICS (1992), and periodic supplements. + +## PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES + +Admitted to Practice Law in Texas (1984), Florida (1986), Alabama (2009), and Tennessee (2014) + +Admitted to the Bar of the United States Supreme Court (2011) + +Admitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (2016) + +Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee (1997-2003; 2006-12; 2017-Present) (Chair, 2002-2003) + +Florida Bar Committee on Professionalism (1999-2000; 2013-Present) (Chair, 2016-2017) + +Florida Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism (2016-2017) + +Special Consultant to Florida Bar Center for Professionalism (2008-2009) + +Trustee, Florida Supreme Court Historical Society (2013-Present) (Exec. Co 014-Present) + +Florida Bar Out of State Division Exec. Council (2005-Present) (Presiders t t & 2014-15) + +Florida Bar Vision 2016 Commission (2013-2016) + +Florida Bar Law Office Mgmt. Assistance Service Adv. Bd. (2007-20 hair, 2011-2013) + +Florida Bar Attorney-Client Privilege Task Force (2006-2009 , Ethics Subcommittee) + +Florida Bar Special Committee on Website Advertising -2007) + +Florida Bar Special Committee to Review ABA Ethi el Rules (2002-2005) + +Florida Bar Unlicensed Practice of Law Commit ) (Vice-chair, 2005-2006) + +Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education Co -2003; 2006-2009; 2016-Present) + +Florida Bar Prepaid Legal Services Corn 2007) + +Florida Bar Law Related Education C 2001-2004) + +Tennessee Bar Assn. Ethics and P Responsibility Committee (2014-Present) + +Tennessee Bar Assn. General P ctice, lo, and Small Firm Section Exec. Council (2017-Present) + +Tennessee Bar Assn. Attorney eing Committee (2017-Present) + +Commissioner, State of A Ethics Commission (2013-2014) + +Alabama State Bar auth. "zed Practice of Law Committee (2007-Present) + +Alabama State r Referral Board of Trustees Committee (2017-Present) + +Alabama S on-resident Members Section (Chair, 2016-17; Exec. Council, 2016-Present) + +Alab Non-resident Lawyers Task Force (Chair, 2015-2016) + +Alabama Bar Disciplinary Rules and Enforcement Committee (2011-2014) (Chair, 2013-14) + +Virginia State Bar Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee (2003-2005) + +Virginia State Bar Multi-Jurisdictional Practice of Law Task Force (2004-2005) + +Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (1991-Present) + +## ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS + +Presented "The Path to Lawyer Well-Being and its Ethical Implications" at the Belmont University College of Law Seminar in Nashville, Tennessee, in December 2017. + +Spoke on "New Issues in Lawyer Advertising and Marketing" at the ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility in Memphis, Tennessee in June 2011. + +Presented "New Directions in Professionalism" to the Florida Bar Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism at Tallahassee, Florida in November 2009. + +Presented "Pioneering with Professionalism: The Journey Begins with Ethics" a Annual Meeting of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) in St. Louis un in July 2006. Spoke on Ethics and the Voting Ri is Act of 1965" at a Symposi by Faulkner University, School of Law, , Alabama in Septembe + +Presented "Professionalism Begins with Ethics" at the Annual M tin: e Southeastern Association of Law Libraries (SEAALL) in Al am April 2005. + +Spoke on "lawyer Advertising: Positive or Negative?" ville, Kentucky College Conference on Ethics in April 2005. + +Presented "The Sarbanes-= as Bad News , Clients, and the Public" at the Ohio Northern University Law Review Symposi telkOhio in March 2005. + +Presented "The Use of Expert Witn Mary's University College of Law Responsibility in San Antonio, yin Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings" at the St. on Legal Malpractice and Professional bruary 2005. + +Spoke on "The Attorney Discipl rocess: Is It Working and Does It Shape Public Opinion Regarding Lawyers?" at eastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) Annual Meeting at Kiawah Island, Sou Caro na in August 2004. + +As keynote s rented "Does an Anormative Approach to Legal Ethics Really Serve the Public?" at ft ilk, Kentucky College Conference on Ethics in Criminal Justice in April 2004. + +Presen and Professionalism in Today's Libraries" at the Virginia Library Association (VLA) An al Meeting in Hot Springs, Virginia in November 2003. + +Presented "Ethics and Professionalism in Law Libraries" at the Annual Meeting of the Virginia Association of Law Libraries (VALL) in Richmond, Virginia in November 2002. + +Spoke on "Law Librarians and the Unauthorized Practice of law" at the Southeastern Association of Law Librarians (SEAALL) Annual Meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida in April 2002. + +Co-presenter with John Berry, Chair of the ABA Professionalism Commission, on "The Future of the Legal Profession," at Appalachian School of Law in November 2000. + +Spoke on "The Ethics of Ethics Consultation" at the 1997 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility in Naples, Florida. + +At the invitation of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, addressed the 1996 Kentucky Bar Association Annual Convention on "Lawyer Advertising Law and Regulation." + +Addressed the 1994 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility on "Orating a State Bar Ethics Opinion and Information Service." + +Spoke on "Nonlawyer Involvement in the Practice of Law" at the 1989 ABA al Conference on Professional Responsibility in Chicago, Illinois. + +## OTHER PRESENTATIONS + +0 + +Presented "Ethics in An Age of Technology" to the Jac stice Association in December 2017. + +Presented "Other People's Money: Properly H n the Plaintiff's Practice," to the Jacksonville Justice Association in Febru + +Presented "Marching in Formation: Fl Ethics Developments" at the Military Affairs Symposium in Orlando, Florida, in + +Presented "What's New in Flo " at the Florida Bar Out of State Division Seminar in New Orleans, Louisiana, in March 2 + +Presented "Electron' Ethi :Staying Compliant in the Digital Age" at the Belmont University College Law Ethic rSemin in Nashville, Tennessee, in December 2015. + +Spoke on Annual S ealth Care Lawyers" at the Tennessee Bar Association Health Law Section ool Springs, Tennessee, in October 2015. + +Presented • thics and the Municipal Practice," at the Tennessee Municipal Attorneys Association Seminar in Nashville, Tennessee, in June 2015. + +Presented "What's New in Florida Legal Ethics?" at Florida Bar General Practice Section Annual Ethics Update in Tampa, Florida in October 2014. + +Presented "Florida Ethics law Update" at Florida Bar Annual Meetings from 2006 through 2014. + +Spoke to the Inn of Court in Tampa, Florida, in March 2014. + +Presented "Ethics for Everyone: Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls" at the 2012 Faulkner Law Alumni Seminar in Alabama in May 2012. + +Spoke on "Ethics Essentials" at the MI-ABA Course of Study, "Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation," in Coral Gables, Florida in February 2011. + +Presented "Ethics Issues 2011" at the Alabama Banking Law Seminar in Birmingham, Alabama in February 2011. + +Presented "Hidden Snares for the Ethical Lawyer" at seminars sponsored by Sc ool of Law in 2010 and 2011. + +Featured speaker on "The Florida Bar Website Advertising Rules: A Deeper OS ' , at S webinar broadcast by the Legal Marketing Association's Southeastern Chapter in + +Presented "Lawyer Advertising: Where Are We, and Where Are We at the Legal Marketing Association's Southeastern Chapter in Charlotte, North C in September 2009. + +Presented "The Ethics of the Law Business" at the S w Annual Alumni Seminar in , Alabama in May 2008. + +Presented "New Dimensions in Legal Ethics: Get ng, and Satisfying Clients Ethically" at the Florida Bar Out-of-State Division seminar ip4j rk in February 2008. + +Spoke on "Ethics Essentials for Alabama at a continuing legal education seminar in Eufaula, Alabama in March 2007. + +Presented "Ethics for Prepaid Le Lawyers" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2005. + +Presented "What's New il Qrida Legal Ethics" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2005. + +Presented "The Meeting in B Act and Related Ethical Developments" at the Florida Bar Annual on, Florida in June 2004. + +Spoke mtze the Risks of Providing Advice to Your Clients" at the Florida Association of Professio Employer Organizations Annual Meeting in Tampa, Florida in April 2004. + +Presented "MJP, the ABA, and Recent Developments in Florida Ethics" at the Florida Bar Out of State Division seminar in New York in December 2003. + +Presented "MJP and Other Recent Developments in Florida Legal Ethics" at the Florida Bar Out of State Division Fall seminar in Chicago, Illinois in October 2003. + +Presented "Hot Ethical Topics for Business Lawyers" at the Florida Bar Business Law Section Annual Retreat in Palm Beach, Florida in August 2003. + +Presented "Ethical Issues in Online Legal Research" at the Virginia State Bar Annual Meeting in Virginia Beach, Virginia in June 2003. + +Spoke on "Insurance Defense Ethics" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2003. + +Presented "Ready or Not: Changes on the Ethical Horizon" to the St. Andrews Bay Ate; s of Court in Panama City, Florida in March 2003. + +Spoke on "Ethics for Trial Lawyers" at a Virginia Trial Lawyers Association ) minar in Roanoke, Virginia in November 2002. + +Discussed "Trust Accounting and Succession Planning for Virginia t an American Liability Protection Society seminar in Grundy, Virginia in Septembe + +Spoke on "Spotting Conflicts of Interest" at the Florida Bar eminar on Ethics in Boca Raton, Florida in June 2002. + +Presented "Hot Topics in Legal Ethics" at the Flo pdate Seminar, sponsored by Florida Bar General Practice Section, in Boca Raton, Flp 4a une 2002. + +Discussed "Preventing Legal Malpractice and General Practice" at a risk manage Insurance Reciprocal in Grundy, Vi Ethics Complaints in Business Transactions erence sponsored by American National Lawyers ay 2002. + +Spoke on "Ethics for Corpora at the Spring Seminar of the Florida Chapter of the American Corporate Counsel A tion (ACCA) in Fort Lauderdale, Florida in May 2002. + +Presented "Unethical Con t. ext Stop, Malpractice Liability" to the Kingsport, Tennessee Bar Association in J 2 + +Spoke on Attorneys Practice of Criminal Defense" to the Virginia College of Criminal Defense e, Virginia, in October 2001. + +Spoke on e Intersection of Ethics, Professionalism, and Malpractice Liability" at the Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics in Orlando, Florida in June 2001. + +Presented "The Top Ten Ethics Issues of the Year" at the Florida Law Update Seminar, sponsored by Florida Bar General Practice Section, in Orlando in June 2001. + +Spoke on "Ethical Issues in the Taking and Use of Depositions" at a Jacksonville, Florida continuing legal education seminar in July 2000. + +Presented "The Internet and Attorney Ethics" at the annual Amelia Island resort seminar sponsored by the Jacksonville Bar Association in June 2000. + +Discussed "Electronic Ethics Issues" at the American Bar Association General Practice Section Spring Meeting in May 2000. + +Spoke on "Practical Legal Research and Analysis" at a Jacksonville seminar for paralegals in November 1999. + +Presented "Lawyers Online: Do Ethics and Image Mix?" at the Inns of Court in Orlando in October 1999. + +Featured luncheon speaker on the topic of "Professionalism in the Informatio nt " at the annual Amelia Island resort seminar sponsored by the Jacksonville Bar Associati 1999. + +Presented "Recent Ethical Developments" at the "Hot Topics in Co ligation" seminar sponsored by the Florida Bar Business Law Section in April 1999. + +Spoke on "Ethics in the Attorney-Client Relationship" and "Su Abuse in the Practice of Law" at The Florida Bar's "Practicing With Professionali prp in November 1998. + +Presented "Why Don't More People Like Us, and \ S on d We Do About It? Another View of Professional Ethics and Professionalism," at thq k pyille Inns of Court in September 1998. + +Spoke on "Ethics for Business Litigators" Florida Bar Business Litigation Certification Examination Review Course in Orland + +Participated in a panel discussio Considerations in Bankruptcy Practice" at the December 1997 meeting of the tam ay Bankruptcy Bar Association. + +Participated in a panel di ion on "The Ethics and Expenses of Undue Influence" at the 1996 Attorney Trust Officer Li n onference in Palm Beach, Florida. + +Spoke to the 1 Attorneys' P a Conference of County Court Judges on "What You Can Do About n Conduct." + +Addre 992 Annual Meeting of the Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers on the subjec "New and Controversial Advisory Opinions." + +Presented "10 Common Sense Rules to Guide You Through the Ethical Minefields of the 1990s" during a 1991 ethics seminar sponsored by Stetson University College of Law. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b43875af4b292d4c229c6c79a4f19716d6bcd83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/EFTA02765506.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1030 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 18, + "chars": 36600, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.46, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E \nAFFIDAVIT OF TIMOTHY P. \nS NOTICE OF FILING \nS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 329.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 329.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFIC RVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 387.30029296875, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 387.30029296875, + 397.10302734375 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 397.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 542.4098510742188, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 542.4098510742188, + 118.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 118.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF TI1k4.CHINARIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 429.947265625, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 429.947265625, + 373.9925231933594 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 373.9925231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIO GROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.88, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 476.5505676269531, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 476.5505676269531, + 459.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 146.88, + 459.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 357.21000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OPERATIVE FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.308, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 370.80169677734375, + 543.51 + ], + [ + 370.80169677734375, + 558.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 250.308, + 558.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MY OPINIONS IN THIS MATTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 405.0574035644531, + 656.9100000000001 + ], + [ + 405.0574035644531, + 673.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 673.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 403.8720397949219, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 403.8720397949219, + 76.36761474609375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 76.36761474609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 194.66079711914062, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 194.66079711914062, + 187.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 187.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMPLOYMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 313.47 + ], + [ + 210.8534698486328, + 313.47 + ], + [ + 210.8534698486328, + 330.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 330.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O \nTED PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 556.4288940429688 + ], + [ + 290.66925048828125, + 556.4288940429688 + ], + [ + 290.66925048828125, + 585.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 585.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 300.1178283691406, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 300.1178283691406, + 88.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 88.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 304.89727783203125, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 304.89727783203125, + 74.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 74.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OTHER PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 278.3085021972656, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 278.3085021972656, + 315.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 315.63043212890625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765506" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/_page_7_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/_page_7_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f9011d45cfe72f74b9931d0dd7e2af2a9f39405 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765506/_page_7_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0a205753095f0f2f90e4ea82664bee055f4c027b2d65e72c92bc9ee46148600d +size 13484 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fac1129f970957640769d31e74b67ff6aa747b71 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.md @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1 IN bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800,OOO5MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EP AFFIDAVIT OF TINA L. C 'S NOTICE OF FILING + +of the attached Affidavit of Tina L. PlaintiffiCounter-Defendantia e ipstein l E as t hereby gives notice of the filing ody of Disc. + +### CERTIFIC + +I certify that the foregoing d Service List below on March 7, 201 of Judicial Administration 2.516 been furnished to the attorneys listed on the e Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara( linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya(MinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice(41inkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

J. [REDACTED]

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

VIA EMAIL
Paul Cassell
383 S. University Str.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

VIA EMAIL
Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTy, FLORIDA + +Case No: 50-2009CA040\$0030QC/CMBAQ + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v" + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIbT individually, and + +J. + +Defendaa/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +CO + +# AFFIDAVIT OF TINA L. CAMPBELL AS TO CHAIN OF CU DY OF DISC + +BEFORE ME, :personally appeared S Campbell who; being first duly sworn deposes and states that: + +- 1, My name is Tina L. p The statements made in this Affidavit are of my own personal knowledge. +- 2. I•am a Ce Florida Registered Paralegal, with the law firm of. Link & Rockenbach, PA. +- 3. On nary 10, 2018, attorney Scott J. Link. and I reviewed approximately 36 boxes Epstein files at Miami, Florida offices.: +- 4. During that review, we: marked select items from apprmdmately,24 bones for, reproduction. Some of those items were discs. We did ,not review the contents of the discs during our review. + +5. On February 1, 2018, at approximately 12:52 p.m. we received three boxes from the firm containing copies of the items we had marked for reproduction. Copies of the Federal Express receipts showing the delivery are attached as Composite Exhibit A. + +6. I am responsible for the intake of documents in this case. Because I was preparing my files for vacation, I did not open or review the contents of the boxes upon receipt. I was on vacation from the afternoon of Friday, February 2, 2018, through Sunday, February 11, 2018. + +7. I began reviewing the boxes received from White upon my return from vacation. One of the items we had flagged for copying was a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" handwritten in a black Sharpie. + +8. I did not begin reviewing the contents of thp disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" until Sunday, February 25, 2018. The documents'on the disc were stamped consecutively but did not contain a pre-fix indicating who produced them. There was also no watermark or confidentiality designation either on the disc or the documents. + +9. On February 27, 2018, we reached out to the firm and requested that deliver all of the boxes to our firm. + +10. On March 1, 2018, we took possession of the 36 boxes of Epstein files from the White firm. + +I L On March 7, 2018, we delivered a copy of the disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" to Jack Scarola. + +12. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. + +STATE OF FLORIDA + +) + +COUNTY OF PALM BEACH + +) ss + +) + +Jina L. Campbell +TINA L. [REDACTED] + +The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 7th day of March, 2018, by TINA L. [REDACTED] who is personally known to me and/or produced identification. + +Jan Elly Reppel + +Notary Public + +Print Name: Laurie Ellyn Reppel + +Commission No.: \_\_\_\_\_ + +My commission expires: \_\_\_\_\_ + +![](_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg) + +COMPOSIT BIT A + +![](_page_6_Picture_34.jpeg) + +FedEx Billing Online + +[Back](#) + +Tracking ID Details + +Tracking ID Summary + +[Help Hide](#) + +Billing Information + +Tracking ID no. 771368290721 Next + +Invoice no. 3-716-14713 + +Account no. [REDACTED] + +Bill date 01/31/2018 + +Total Billed \$70.00 + +Tracking ID Balance due \$0.00 + +Status Paid CC + +Messages + +Distance Based Pricing, Zone 2 +Fuel Surcharge - FedEx has applied a fuel surcharge [Read More](#) + +[View Invoice History](#) + +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +Transaction Details + +[Help Hide](#) + +Sender Information + +Oscar [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett +1395 Brickell Avenue +MIAMI FL 33131 +US + +Recipient Information + +Tina [REDACTED] +Link & Rockenbach +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd +WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 +US + +Shipment Details + +Ship date 01/31/2018 + +Payment type Shipper + +Service type FedEx Standard Overnight + +Zone 02 + +Package type Customer Packaging + +Rated weight 37.00lbs + +Pieces 1 + +Meter No. 111861530 + +Declared value \$0.00 + +Charges + +| Transportation Charge | 78.62 | +|-----------------------|----------------| +| Fuel Surcharge | 3.96 | +| Weekday Delivery | 0.00 | +| Discount | -12.58 | +| Total charges | \$70.00 | + +Original Reference + +Customer reference no. 0002.0001 + +Department no. + +Reference #2 + +Reference #3 + +Proof of Delivery + +Delivery date 02/01/201812:52 + +Service area code A1 + +Signed by [REDACTED] + +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +[Back](#) + +![](_page_7_Picture_34.jpeg) + +FedEx Billing Online + +Tracking ID Details + +[Back](#) + +Tracking ID Summary + +[Help Hide](#) + +Billing Information + +| Tracking ID no. | <Prev 771368257321 ▼ Next | +|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Invoice no. | 3-716-14713 | +| Account no. | [REDACTED] | +| Bill date | 01/31/2018 | +| Total Billed | \$71.24 | +| Tracking ID Balance due | \$0.00 | +| Status | Paid CC | + +Messages + +Distance Based Pricing, Zone 2 + Fuel Surcharge - FedEx has applied a fuel surcharge [Read More](#). + +[View Invoice History](#) + +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +Transaction Details + +[Help Hide](#) + +Sender Information + +Oscar [REDACTED] + [REDACTED] Burnett + 1395 Brickell Avenue + MIAMI FL 33131 + US + +Recipient Information + +Tina Campbell + Link & Rockenbach + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd + WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 + US + +Shipment Details + +| Ship date | 01/31/2018 | +|----------------|--------------------------| +| Payment type | Shipper | +| Service type | FedEx Standard Overnight | +| Zone | 02 | +| Package type | Customer Packaging | +| Rated weight | 38.00lbs | +| Pieces | 1 | +| Meter No. | 111861530 | +| Declared value | \$0.00 | + +Charges + +| Transportation Charge | 80.01 | +|-----------------------|----------------| +| Fuel Surcharge | 4.03 | +| Weekday Delivery | 0.00 | +| Discount | -12.80 | +| Total charges | \$71.24 | + +Original Reference + +Customer reference no. 0002.0001 + Department no. + Reference #2 + Reference #3 + +Proof of Delivery + +Delivery date 02/01/201812:52 + Service area code A1 + Signed by +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +[Back](#) + +![](_page_8_Picture_32.jpeg) + +FedEx Billing Online + +[Back](#) + +Tracking ID Details + +Tracking ID Summary + +[Help Hide](#) + +Billing Information + +| Tracking ID no. | Prev 771368219640 Next > | +|-------------------------|--------------------------| +| Invoice no. | 3-716-14713 | +| Account no. | [REDACTED] | +| Bill date | 01/31/2018 | +| Total Billed | \$46.05 | +| Tracking ID Balance due | \$0.00 | +| Status | Paid CC | + +Messages + +FedEx has audited this shipment for correct package [Read More](#). + We calculated your charges based on a dimensional [Read More](#). + Distance Based Pricing, Zone 2 + Fuel Surcharge - FedEx has applied a fuel surcharge [Read More](#). + +[View Invoice History](#) + +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +Transaction Details + +[Help Hide](#) + +Sender Information + +Oscar [REDACTED] + [REDACTED] Burnett + 1395 Brickell Avenue + MIAMI FL 33131 + US + +Recipient Information + +Tina Campbell + Link & Rockenbach + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd + WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 + US + +Shipment Details + +| Ship date | 01/31/2018 | +|----------------|--------------------------| +| Payment type | Shipper | +| Service type | FedEx Standard Overnight | +| Zone | 02 | +| Package type | Customer Packaging | +| Actual weight | 13.00lbs | +| Rated weight | 18.00lbs | +| Pieces | 1 | +| Meter No. | 111861530 | +| Declared value | \$0.00 | + +Charges + +| Transportation Charge | 51.71 | +|-----------------------|---------| +| Fuel Surcharge | 2.61 | +| Weekday Delivery | 0.00 | +| Discount | -8.27 | +| Total charges | \$46.05 | + +Original Reference + +Customer reference no. 0002.0001 + Department no. + Reference #2 + Reference #3 + +Proof of Delivery + +Delivery date 02/01/201812:52 + Service area code A1 + Signed by +[View signature proof of delivery](#) + +[Back](#) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..672ea4dd040e1577d53f2454496f8349fc10b130 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/EFTA02765524.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 13729, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.76, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_34.jpeg", + "_page_7_Picture_34.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_32.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EP \nAFFIDAVIT OF TINA L. C \n'S NOTICE OF FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 527.27978515625, + 329.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 329.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFIC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 383.13 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF TINA L. CAMPBELL \nAS TO CHAIN OF CU DY OF DISC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.392, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 411.5762634277344, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 411.5762634277344, + 363.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 193.392, + 363.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FedEx Billing Online", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 25.092000000000002, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 25.092000000000002, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 34.884, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 34.884, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 34.884, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 34.884, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billing Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 43.452, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 43.452, + 167.67000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Messages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.26800000000003, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 299.26800000000003, + 166.04999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Transaction Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.944, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 37.944, + 322.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sender Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.288, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 45.288, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Recipient Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.104, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 373.93199999999996, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 301.104, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Shipment Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.288, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 45.288, + 410.6700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Charges", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.104, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 333.54, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 333.54, + 409.86 + ], + [ + 301.104, + 409.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Original Reference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.288, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 45.288, + 524.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Proof of Delivery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 45.288, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 583.2 + ], + [ + 45.288, + 583.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FedEx Billing Online", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 25.704000000000004, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 25.704000000000004, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 35.496, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 35.496, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.944, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 37.944, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billing Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.06399999999999, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 44.06399999999999, + 166.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Messages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.492, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 300.492, + 165.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Transaction Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.944, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 37.944, + 322.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sender Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.512, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 46.512, + 341.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Recipient Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.552, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Shipment Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.512, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 400.14 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 410.6700000000001 + ], + [ + 46.512, + 410.6700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Charges", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.552, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 408.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Original Reference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.512, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 515.16 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 46.512, + 524.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Proof of Delivery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.512, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 583.2 + ], + [ + 46.512, + 583.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FedEx Billing Online", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 25.704000000000004, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 25.704000000000004, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 35.496, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 35.496, + 131.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Tracking ID Summary", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 121.17600000000002, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 37.331999999999994, + 149.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billing Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.06399999999999, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 44.06399999999999, + 166.04999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Messages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.492, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 336.6, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 300.492, + 164.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Transaction Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 38.556, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 38.556, + 320.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sender Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.124, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 110.77199999999999, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 47.124, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Recipient Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.552, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 339.39 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Shipment Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.124, + 399.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 399.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 409.86 + ], + [ + 47.124, + 409.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Charges", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.552, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 334.15200000000004, + 408.24 + ], + [ + 303.552, + 408.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Original Reference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.348, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 48.348, + 532.98 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Proof of Delivery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.348, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 48.348, + 591.3 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765524" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00c6fcdb13cfac76cb858db98b579a5fe9fb3334 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6ee39b49f5f4aaf06ee2578921373d9db1f8ce1c2278c0017559e29099a822ed +size 20705 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_6_Picture_34.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_6_Picture_34.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cd88775cf4ca188451d242863a35fe4b960c6aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_6_Picture_34.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4218456d8a7420fe676498b1774ae5c133f26804a51d6bc048e10a9a405f7067 +size 2668 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_7_Picture_34.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_7_Picture_34.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f82d513aa8b8d48829123a819f0002ab08b1fb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_7_Picture_34.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8dd721103290270ee50f895b81b646455123ea3f924267508615a3ed2d8d9431 +size 2733 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_8_Picture_32.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_8_Picture_32.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97efa5019623f5c541011e4326d423d5f0a3d8c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765524/_page_8_Picture_32.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:80ee4c5a07fac153fa523db13b74127526f871ccc506ec1cde2a487d23824e41 +size 2728 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b5e54fd13840cbf6ecaed6f56c01f15b78a8e1f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY IN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT THE INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE ALLEGED TO SUPPORT EPSTEIN'S CL If AVAINST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey pstein') responds in opposition to the Motion filed by Defendant/Counter-P. to Limit Introduction of Evidence alleged to support E against and states: + +## INTRODUCTION + +has argu atedly that evidence Epstein discovered after filing suit should not be allowed at triatuse it dots not support what Epstein knew at the time he filed his Complaint. This ar fo is that has disputed Epstein's probable cause for the continuation of the a ugh its dismissal in 2012. Furthermore, a party can obtain evidence through subsequent discovery that supports the party's probable cause. No party must have "all the evidence" at the time he files his lawsuit in order to defend against a claim of malicious prosecution. That simply is not the legal standard. Finally, —not Epstein—has the burden of proof in this case, and has had more than sufficient time in the eight years of this + +pending litigation in which to discover evidence that would satisfy his heavy burden. If is concerned with the evidence being presented to a jury, he has the choice of dismissing his lawsuit but not hiding the truth. + +## ARGUMENT + +contends that evidence unknown to Epstein at the time he filed suit against on December 7, 2009, could not possibly have supported probable for such prosecution. (Mot. at ¶ 2). Also, for the first time, arbitrarily pie 7, 2010—the date of Epstein's deposition—as "the cut-off for any information Eps el can allege that their client relied upon in either instituting or continuing the I it a inst , since the deposition is the only possible source of testimony fro t party, and because Epstein effectively precluded discovery into the probable ', 83, i e ugh his assertions of privilege." (Mot. at ¶ 4). These arguments are meritless s. t + +To prevail in a malicious prosecution ion, a plaintiff must establish the following elements: `"fr + +> (1) an original 1 judicial proceeding against the present plaintiff was co ced or continued. (2) the present defendant was the le se of the original proceeding against the present plain th defendant in the original proceeding; (3) the to ation of the original proceeding constituted a bona fide n of that proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff; (4) Q i was an absence of probable cause for the original eeding; (5) there was malice on the part of the present defendant; and (6) the plaintiff suffered damage as a result of the original proceeding. + +Alamo Rent—A—Car, Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1355 (Fla. 1994) (emphasis added). "[A] balancing of the various interests involved has appropriately resulted in imposing a particularly heavy burden of proof upon an individual claiming malicious prosecution." v. GCC Beverages, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 1986) (emphasis added). + +is easily relevant to support Epstein's basis and prob proceeding and continuation of same. probable cause issue at Epstein's January 25, eight years since this lawsuit has bee L.....edin Therefore, evidence uncovered after Epstein's March c)1 10 sition, as Epstein did belief for his original civil nity to re-depose Epstein on the sition, but failed to do so. Indeed, in the has ample opportunity to discover evidence with which to satisfy his en of proof. + +Clearly, evidence discovered by Epstein during his continuation of the suit against - and even during his defense of the malicious prosecution action — is relevant to counter allegations that Epstein did not have probable cause to continue his action against Otherwise, what would be the role of a defense? Simply because Epstein has invoked the Fifth Amendment does not mean he cannot serve interrogatories, requests for productio , and take depositions. There is nothing in the United States Constitution, as woul ntly like this Court to insert, that states a citizen who invokes his Fifth Amendme • main silent C5 re cannot defend through discovery against a civil malicious prosecutio i + +Lastly, conte because Epstein has failed to raise the advice of counsel defense, he should be b introducing any deposition testimony or interrogatory answers to which he invo attom y-client privilege. The Fifth Amendment does not provide proposed ha on a defendant's right to defend a civil action. argues the reason for preclu evidence "is simple: by invoking attorney-client privilege to questions regarding what Epstein relied upon to support probable cause to institute and continue the civil proceeding against , Epstein implies that his lawyers provided information to support a finding of probable cause." (Mot. at I 7). Not true. Epstein is a party and the party, not the attorneys, propounds discovery. The party, whether he invokes the Fifth Amendment or not, is the one seeking and obtaining discovery relevant to his defense! + +Contrary to assertion, the privilege invoked by Epstein in the discovery responses at issue was not attorney-client, but the privilege(s) against self-incrimination and right to counsel guaranteed by the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. (See generally Ex. A to Motion). As such, Epstein's responses do not imply in any way that his lawyers provided information to support a finding of probable cause. + +In short, arguments fail and should be rejected. Accord Epstein respectfully requests that the Court deny IMF requested relief. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on March 7, 2018, through the Court's e of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINKia ACH, PA 155 4 4%7 B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 I each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +Iir /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Angela®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsellor Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28994a9735bc23275249c60b4f48275a4a1634b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533/EFTA02765533.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765533.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 10803, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY IN'S RESPONSE IN \nOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL \nMOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT THE INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE ALLEGED \nTO SUPPORT EPSTEIN'S CL If AVAINST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 530.8123168945312, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 530.8123168945312, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 356.18560791015625, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 356.18560791015625, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765533" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe4294f90eb5ecc61a27320ebba586b426522f1c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.md @@ -0,0 +1,4250 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXJ0CMI3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF FIN'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEINtT ELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS A ANY REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS CONTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED ON OEM PRIVILEGE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffre ("Epstein") responds to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Motio pstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any R Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log. + +# ISSUES TO BE DECIDED BY THE COURT + +AeThe ' ues for the Court to decide include: (1) are the exhibits identified by Epstein relevant- re the documents, when created, protected by the work product discovery doctrine; and (3) e work-product protection been waived based on (a) production to Razorback, (b) issue injection, (c) crime fraud exception, (d) fraud on the court, and (e) delivery by the Special based on instructions from Mr. Scarola to provide to whatever documents the Special deems producible. + +# IN I ROMIG I !ON + +has asserted the disc was stolen. Epstein's cu rent counsel has disclosed in detail how it received the disc. See Affidavit of Tina L. has also wrongfully called into questions the ethics of Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach. See Affidavit of Timothy P. Chinaris. The disc was not stolen from anyone! + +The disc of 27,000+ pages of e-mails came from Epstein's former counse e It is unknown if the disc of e-mails that is the subject of Motion by directly, IMF counsel, the Bankruptcy Trt a Special assertion that the "27,500-page disc" was never pm t) ' to firm and Rockenbach is facially flawed and lacking even a evidence to justify it and is itself that somehow it has been unethically and inappropri ,frgre t) ned by Mr. Link and Ms. unprofessional and unethical to accuse couns g the disc. Furthermore, the chronology i i ISic provided to the Court to suppo s b> less assertion is incomplete. For instance, at a March 15, 2011, hearing before t 'Master, counsel stated, "The situation we have here is one where we hav turn over the documents themselves for in-camera inspection. They're available to you. look at them. We have told you to turn over anything and emything that y kink relevant, material, not privileged by attorney-client privilege, not work-produe it to them." (3/15/11 Hearing Transcript, p. 43) (Excerpt, Exhibit A). Possi to he disc that is the subject of Motion came from the Special . At this point in time, it is simply unknown and, frankly, not germane to the real issues to be decided by the Court. has studiously avoided any meaningful substantive discussion as to those issues which are central to Motion. + +We do know that in July 2011, counsel told the Court that had "nothing to hide" in the alleged privileged documents and was just concerned about waiving the attorneyclient privilege: + +> ...as much as we might like to take all of this and put it on the floor in the courtroom for Your Honor and everybody else in the world to take a look at because we have nothing to hide we can't do that. + +See 7/13/11 hearing transcript, p. 58 (Excerpt, Exhibit B). Based on ence that asks this Court to exclude, it is clear that does have so hide. He is asking the Court to strike that evidence because it proves his claim f tCma s prosecution has no merit. + +# A. Privilege Log Confusion + +Motion is based largely on un b accusations of wrongdoing and unethical behavior by Mr. Link and says the disc was stolen) and a February 23, 2011, privilege log. Ed re es to address the relevance of the evidence. Understandably, he cannot becaus ce is the death of his claim. From a review of the Court's records, the February 2 1 p ege log appears to be null and void. For instance, on May 7, 2012, the Court found February 23, 2011, privilege log was insufficient on its face and ordered ards o provide "a more complete privilege log" within 30 days. (Exhibit C.) On Au 0 2, the Court vacated that Order without prejudice, and ordered to produ privilege log as referenced in this Court's May 7, 2012 Order." (Exhibit D.) Epstein's counsel has not found a subsequent privilege log. + +Furthermore, the description of documents on the February 23, 2011, privilege log is seriously misleading and inadequately describes the participants or contents to be able to determine whether the documents were subject to privilege or if portions should have been produced in + +redacted form. In addition, has identified Bate stamp ranges, and multiple documents are contained within those ranges that have not been listed individually. + +The following are illustrative examples: + +- 4408-4412 is an 10/17/09 e-mail exchange between and Cassell where, asks Cassell if there was any way he could "bait [Epstein] into suing me". + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | PlfliThi\$GE | +|--------|------|----|------|-------------|-------------------| +| 04403- | | | | | W/Atorn y Client | +| | | | | | nd t reasonably," | + +- 4399-4400 is an 10/17/09 e-m ~ discussing how much better a irs had settled for \$155,000. [The date on the privilege log is not ev huge between and Cassell or this document.] + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | PRIVILEGE | +|---------------|---------|-----------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 4387-
4402 | 8/19/09 | Paul
Cassell | Bradley
Edwards | Victim Complaints,
Forensic accounts, &
Epstein's Fraudulent
Transfers | W/P; Attorney Client
Privilege; irrelevant
and not reasonably
calculated to lead to
the discovery of
admissible evidence;
protected by privacy
rights | + +1,S iple e-mails dated 10/23/09 about direct participation with Rothstein, ,..; ,.. .. and others to avoid the structured settlement statute for an Epstein case (the following is just a sampling from the privilege log) + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | PRIVILEGE | +|-------------|----------|------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 08033-08070 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25997 | 10/23/09 | Scott Rothstein | Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +# 14. Rex ims of Documents + +A duplicate of the disc has been provided to counsel. Epstein's current counsel has not reviewed of the \LP7,000 pages on the disc. However, from the 110 items listed on the Appendix th m the disc, 44 (less than half) are listed on the February 23, 2011, privilege log, 14 ed as exhibits at May 2013 deposition, and 52 others were neither used as exhibits or identified on the privilege log. + +Epstein's team has reviewed approximately 4,000 — 5,000 of the 27,000 e-mails. Many of the e-mails have no relevance to the issues of this case and were not printed (for instance, e-mails relating to musical and sporting events and other non-business-related communications). + +counsel's contention, therefore, that only privileged information is contained on the disc that he alleges Epstein's current counsel somehow wrongfully obtained is untrue. + +In reviewing as carefully as possible from a forensic look-back standpoint, there are significant gaps in the correspondence, documents and records to fully understand how various document issues were resolved. The following are examples of what may have occu Aed: + +- All 27,000 pages on the disc have been produced to both Epstein an Razorback. (See April 8, 2011, and June 7, 2011, letters which a to indicate that Razorback's counsel received 27,000+ pages ofd in the Epstein matter). (Exhibits E and F.) +- The 1,600 identified and withheld by from appear to have already been produced to Razorback claim of work product protection. in mails immating any +- The 27,000+ pages ma have been revie aced to by the Special as requeste y carola. +- may have maintained teYdisc containing the 1,600 privileged, never-before produ ail and has a copy of that disc. We found no copy ch a isc in the files we obtained from =, and none ect e-mails Epstein seeks to use as evidence came from + +Adding to the confusio the isc shows that the 27,000 documents were burned to it in December 2010. Unfortu it seems that no one can say with certainty who delivered the disc to at is known now is that these documents were produced to Epstein by e or the Special without a signed Confidentiality Agreement. The pro p is for the Court to review all of the alleged work product "privileged" documents to determine the relevancy and whether any work-product protection still exists. Importantly, none of the appendix documents were communications to or from clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). All of the documents are internal RRA communications or communications with the media. 'The trial of this case should be about uncovering the truth related to claim against Epstein, which contends is directly related to the truth of Epstein's claims against not about hidingrelevant evidence) All of the lawyers in this case have ethical obligations to our profession to bring the truth to light. + +# C. Factual Inconsistencies + +From a review of the documents, it is unclear how many documents were reviewed by and produced and when this occurred. There are conflicting statements in the record and those made by counsel. Epstein addresses some of the factual in ncies and confusion created by law firm: regarding the production by of ments to the + +| Date | Event | No. of Documents | +|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 9/20/10 | [REDACTED] Motion provides that 27,590 pages were provided to the Special [REDACTED] | 27,590 | +| 11/2/10 | [REDACTED] informed the Bankruptcy Court that the RRA Trustee had produced 74,000 pages of documents on two compact discs ( this event was not included in [REDACTED] chronology to the Court ) | 74,000 | +| 11/30/10 | Edwards' Motion for Stay of Subpoena in this action provides that Edwards had to review more than 70,000 pages of materials to identify responsiveness and to assert an appropriate privilege ( this event was not included in [REDACTED] chronology to the Court ) | 70,000 | +| 12/16/10 | LM advised the Bankruptcy Court that there would be approximately 24,000 pages produced | 24,000 | +| 1/25/11 | [REDACTED] Motion provides that 8,408 pages were produced to Epstein | 8,408 | +| 2/23/11 | [REDACTED] Motion provides that 12,711 pages were produced to Epstein | 12,711 (bringing the total produced to 21,119) | + +| Date | Event | No. of Documents | +|----------|--------------------------|-------------------| +| 5/7/12 | Motion provides that | 163 (bringing the | +| | E nic | | +| 10/10/13 | MI testified that he had | | + +\*All of the 163 pages (representing 89 documents) produced by Edwardg 7, 2012, are found on the disc that claims was stolen and are identified an Edwards' February 23, 2011, privilege log. That means, 89 documents listed on the lege log that claims has never been produced to Epstein were used in this ji ggt shout objection. Those 89 documents which are on the disc and contained o 54kt p igi1L Despite having previously been the victim of character assassination by the Defendant ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S associate and client, Jeffrey Epstein, J. en s a h' favorable national reputation particularly related to his defending the rights of child victims of sexual abuse. + +(Dershowitz, Complaint, I 8, emphasis added.) + +alleged that Dershowitz made a media Ete.ct )Q him (and Paul G. Cassell) to + +DERSHOWITZ initiated a blic media assault on the reputation and character of L J. and PAUL G. CASSEL accusing th of in tionally lying in their filing, of having leveled lmovvi y false...accusations against the Defendant DERSHOWITZ, wi out ever conducting any investigation of the creditability of t ons, and of having acted unethically to the extent that eir Iful misconduct warranted and required + +(Dershowitz, Comp t, ¶ lit 7.) h + +In Ap 0l wards, Cassell and Dershowitz resolved their respective claims and I informed the Court that the filing of their action against Dershowitz was a "tactical ." (Dershowitz, Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.) + +In order to maximize his recovery on his claims against Dershowitz, had to and did allege that his reputation had recovered (from any effects of Epstein's suit against him) and + +J. and Paul G. Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-15-000072. + +that Dershowitz' defaming public statements caused harm to his reputation. Now that has admitted that suing Dershowitz was a tactical mistake, he claims that Epstein is once again the cause of harm to his reputation. Epstein, therefore, identified exhibits that contradict this position. + +# D. Website and Verdicts + +Epstein has identified as trial exhibits printouts from current website d verdicts and judgments referenced therein. touts his jury verdicts, includin 4btdicts he has received since Epstein filed suit (\$7.1 million, \$5.7 million, \$24 million, e • important for the jury to understand and see how has not "suffered" from ing of the lawsuit against him. + +# E. Property Records + +Epstein has identified as trial exhibits info St yo real property ownership i i d to show the jury how success after mbs• v suit has allowed him to invest in more expensive and larger real estate. + +# F. CVRA Documents + +has taken the °si < i \*)that the Crime Victims' Rights Act action against the United States Govemme motive for Epstein filing suit against him. Because that action will play a key , Epstein identified additional pleadings from that action. Epstein points out th himself identified the entire action on his Exhibit List. Trial Exhibi + +# CONTINUA OF THE LAWSUIT IS AN ISSUE + +During the December 5, 2017, hearing, counsel made clear that he intended to prove that Epstein did not have probable cause to file the action or to continue it. Specifically, counsel argued: + +1 MR. SCAROLA: ... +2 .... We contend there was no probable +3 cause to initiate this proceeding, there was +4 no probable cause to continue the +5 proceeding. The initiation and continuation +6 of the proceeding caused damage to [REDACTED] +7 [REDACTED], both because no probable cause ever +8 existed. So it was both initiated and +9 continued in the absence of probable cause. + +(12/5/17 Transcript, p. 46) (Excerpt, **Exhibit I**). + +The parties have further stipulated in the Pre-trial Stipulation that the continuation of the action will be addressed at trial: + +2.B. If Epstein had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against [REDACTED] at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding against Edwards, based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against Edwards was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +2.C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring [REDACTED] or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against [REDACTED] with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +2.D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. ([REDACTED] disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the + +action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +Pre-Trial Stipulation. (Exhibit J.) + +has the burden of proof. The e-mails recently disclosed as trial exhibits are critical to the cross examination of both as to his credibility and as support for the continuation of the proceeding and Epstein will be prejudiced if he is not allowed to introduce th at trial. + +# HISTORY OF DISCLOSURE OF TRIAL EXHIBITS4S., + +## A. July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +The Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial C 0 vi )1es, in pertinent part: + +ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OIi. BJ IONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited !ON and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the s 6chdes attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accortianec with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specificallyslated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness diaCovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D other counsel with a d reason for the late exhibit or with shown or to p II inunediately furnish the Court and f the exhibit ..., together with the f the exhibit or witness. Use of the allowed by the Court for good cause fest injustice. + +Order,' G (Exhibit K). + +Pursuant e Tria Order, the deadline for the parties to exchange Exhibit Lists was 60 days prior to 'al; t is, by October 6. 2017. + +# B. s Exhibit Lists + +Epstein's current counsel appeared in this case on November 1, 2017. At that time, Epstein's operative Exhibit Lists contained only twenty-one items, many of which were identified categorically. (Composite Exhibit L.) In order to better identify the documents, Epstein filed an Amended Exhibit List on November 16, 2017, listing the documents individually that previously were identified in categories. (Exhibit M.) In the Amended Exhibit List, Epstein also identified some general categories, such as: + +- 13. All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter, +- 18. L.M. v. Epstein, court filings, etc. +- 30. L.M. v. Epstein (federal court), court filings, etc. +- 35. E.W. v. Epstein, court filings, etc. AO,4 1 +- 48. Jane Doe v. Epstein, court filings, etc. +- 59. Jane Doe 2 v. Epstein, court filings, etc. +- 68. Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler v. Rothstein, c flit , etc. +- 84. Razorback Funding v. Rothstein, , etc. +- 323. All public records and new Ah ii to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler,' le and any witnesses listed by either party +- 324. All court dockets in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any aims. +- 328. All rebu eachment exhibits. +- 330. All newly C• undovered documents/exhibits. + +On Novem 29, ember 5 and December 7, 2017, important rulings were made by this Court that di im ted the evidence that would be presented at trial. For instance, the Court determin ards would be allowed to provide evidence about his three clients' underlying claims an at Epstein would need to prove each allegation of his Complaint, including that clients' claims were "weak." These rulings resulted in additional evidence needed for trial. + +On December 19, 2017, Epstein's counsel provided counsel with a flash drive containing the exhibits identified on Epstein's November 16, 2017, Amended Exhibit List, and + +stated, "In light of the Court's recent rulings, we anticipate amending our Exhibit List after we have had an opportunity to review Mr. Epstein's former counsels'files." (Exhibit N.) + +On February 2, February 16, and March 2, 2018, Epstein's counsel provided counsel with additional exhibits that fell within Exhibit Nos. 18, 25, 48, 323 and 324. (Composite Exhibit 0.) Those documents were identified above. In the February 2, 2018, transmittal, Epstein's counsel advised, "We are still obtaining additional public records an 'de those to you upon our receipt." + +In addition, on February 22, 2018, Epstein's counsel's office Q counsel's office that Epstein would be updating his Exhibit List to list ea m 1 vidually as required by the Clerk's guidelines for submission of trial exhibits. (E t re + +On March 5, 2018, Epstein filed his Cle ts i Si List which identified each item individually that had been previously provid S , ' counsel. (Exhibit Q.) + +# C. Exhibit Lists + +amended his Exhi t tiple times as well, serving his last list on December 7, 2017, after the original dea any of the items on list are listed categorically and not in compliance wi lerk's guidelines to identify each exhibit separately. + +# D. Decembe . Pre-Trial Stipulation + +As a y the Court's Order Specially Setting Jury Trial, in their Pre-Trial Stipulation, the p that "Theparties do not waive their right to amend their Exhibits Lists and to identify additional objections for those exhibits that have not yet been disclosed and/or provided to correspond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists." Thus, the parties agreed that amendments to their Exhibit Lists could be filed after the filing of the Pre-Trial Stipulation. + +# CONCLUSION + +# Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach did not steal the disc! + +There is no doubt that the exhibits recently discovered and identified by Epstein's counsel are relevant to the issues to be tried. Epstein does not believe any attorney-client privilege (none of the exhibits are to or from a RRA lawyer and one of IIM clients — Jane Doe, E. . or L.M.) or work product protection applies to the identified exhibits. The evidence ca tly into question the veracity and truthfulness of in this case. It would be • age of justice for the jury not to see the real . There is uncertainty about sc containing the 27,000 pages of e-mails that was recently discovered by Epste• ' counsel in the boxes came from. The documents do not clarify i di as provided to by , the Trustee, or the Special M 'iSii tiibit difficult is the fact that none of the documents contained on the disc bear any s "Slic n o • lity legend or watermark. What is clear is that Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach d' At ....e t st the disc. Although Epstein's counsel has not had the opportunity yet to review o ges on the disc, their review of 5,000 pages reveals a hodgepodge of mostly irrelev few relevant documents. The uncertainty regarding when and how these materials duced to should not dictate whether or not to admit relevant and non deg or no longer privileged evidence directly germane to the issues that hi made central to this case, as well as the credibility and trustworthiness of %rii.s • a central witness in this case. + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that Motion be denied and that he be allowed to introduce the exhibits identified on his Clerk's Exhibit List at the trial of this matter. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 7, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Byis/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scottglinttljtw.com Angela M. Many (F Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco S Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com nkrocklaw.com + +(S /e' S i Counsel fo r PPlaintiff/Counter-Defendant "isi me ffrey Epstein + +# 4 RVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach bakes evard West Palm Bea L 33 me scarolatea Co-C law com r Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff' dwards & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njsQFLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseicaendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

VIA EMAIL
Paul Cassell
383 S. University Str.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

VIA EMAIL
Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +MEETING HELD BEFORE SPECIAL CARNEY + +IN RE: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICI CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLOR + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro + +C ::) CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMb 'q + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT-ROTHSTEIN, indivi J. EDWARDS, i and L.M., individua + +Defen + +DATE T Tuesday, (March 15,)(FEU) TIM 10:05 AM - 12:35 PM PLR: SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART .6 yy 6S West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 SHIPLEY 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +> Lee Lynott, Registered Merit Reporter Registered Professional Reporter Certified Shorthand. Reporter Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. 1218 SE 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 + +2 + +# APPEARANCES: + +WHITE, BURNETT, P.A. BY: LILLY ANN , ESQUIRE ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE KNIGHT, ESQUIRE One Financial Plaza - 21st Floor 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FIST AN, P.L. + +BY: 425 N. Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Flor + +SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLJC-\$AITRT & SHIPLEY BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 2139 lik.Beach Lakes Boulevard We alarBeach, Florida 33409 + +< 42\*ALSO PRESENT: + +III!!!!) + +NBERGER via telephone + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 within 10 days or 30 days, I've forgotten exactly which, from the issuance of the subpoena or from the notice of the subpoena. But again, accepting 'that he doesn't have' the documents and doesn't know :what's in the documents at this point, what they are, again, I'm not sure quite as troubled by that. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 But as I say, we still get to the-question: . How does he object. to it? Because the\_objection was only a privilege objectionNIthink there is a pretty fair argumen5,,aConld be made at , . that point that it waives-the overbreadth objection and what miteleft with is a privilege objeCtion, Mhich!would.require a privilege ,l,T,)7 + +16 17 18 19 20 21\ 22 23 MR.' SCALI4A: I have multiple responses for th a srThe first is that,. Gosman tells us how we -sdealc,pwith circumstances where we're in gray areas. And what Gosman explicitly holds is \_ ,!1 that an implied waiver of privilege is not favored in Florida law. There must be an expressed waiver. There, clearly, has been no expressed waiver under these circumstances. + +24 25 But let's move on from procedure to substance, if we could. This is not a + +circumstance where an adverse party seeking discovery makes the determination of the appropriateness of a privilege objection. That determination is to be made initially by you and subsequently by whichever judge or judges have to make that determination. + +The issue has got to be: Have you been provided with sufficient information in order to make those determinations? + +/ T-I-G addresses the sitnation'Where a privilege log is provided -it:lien of the production of documents. - The situation we have) (here is one where we have turned over the) (documents themSglveS lor in-camera inspection.) (Theylre\_aygilsble to you.) You can look at them. (we\_havd' told\_you to turn over anything and) (everything that you think is relevant, material") rivileged by attorney-client privileges) 4:Sorkiproduc) (Give it to them) + +O You don't need a privilege log where the document is described, because you have the document. You don't need a privilege log that tells you who the author of the document was, because you have the document and it identifies who the author was. You don't need a privilege + +1 log that tells you to whom the documents were +2 directed, because the documents tell you to whom +3 they were directed.. + +4 Every inadequacy that they have described in +5 the privilege log is overcome by the fact that +6 we have voluntarily made the documents +7 themselves available and are prepared to answer +8 whatever questions you may have relating to +9 those documents during the course of an +10 in-camera inspection, if you determine that +11 that's what needs to be done. + +12 SPECIAL [REDACTED] CARNEY: I'm not -- Let me +13 pause here for a second, because I'm not sure +14 you and I are on the same page on this. + +15 What I'm understanding is, the procedure +16 that seems to be set out as the appropriate +17 procedure on a privilege log issue is: Once the +18 privilege log has been filed, there is a +19 hearing. It's not an in-camera inspection at +20 that point. It is a hearing where the other +21 side challenges, if they will, the privilege. +22 What their position is is, they can't challenge +23 it without more information. + +24 For example, the memo to confidential +25 source. They can't challenge that without the + +information as to whether there would be a 2 3 4 privilege or whether that's something that falls outside of the privilege, because it's a disclosure. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MR. SCAROLA: We are on the same page, because I agree with you that the standard procedure is: First, the preliminary determination as to whether the documents\_are discoverable, if not, privileged. Then the filing of a privilege log as o diicoverable material that is claimedAtche + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 N\ That log identifid ocUMents with sufficient particnia ies so that the parties seeking the diS"cOverican challenge the \. assertion wf/privilege and then an in-camera ,fr ' inspection to make a determination after the 'chellenge is raised as to whether the challenge .—is or is not valid. + +19 21 22 23 24 25 ( O What I am suggesting to you is, we have voluntarily skipped ahead and provided everything for an in-camera inspection which we would ordinarily not be obliged to do. And because we have waived our right to have the defense establish a prima facie showing for an in-camera inspection, the inadequacies that they 1 2 are arguing exists in the privilege log become absolutely irrelevant. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 The documents are there for a determination as to whether any of them are privileged. And if there is any questions that arise with the. ..44sv documents in front of you as to whether th re ic or are not privileged or otherwise disc a , CIM:4Ini e we're prepared to respond to those es . + +9 10 11 12 13 ) We have met our obligation b voluntarily producing the documents for without putting the part the burden of establ ra inspection ing discovery to ome prima facie basis for the in- nspection. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 That's the purpose of the privilege • / log, so that,they have a basis to challenge the assertion of privilege and to require that certain documents be inspected in-camera. We've / - waiVed it. We've given you everything.. I don't \*low that there is anything more, certainly, that we.are obliged to do. + +21 22 23 24 SPECIAL CARNEY: (Just so we're clear.) (Actually)(in terms of the Stapp documents) (I) (still don't have the Stamp documented) (I've never had the Stamp documents) + +25 MR. SCAROLA: (They are available.) (Pm are) + +available. (We've offered them before) (offer them to you again) (Review them. we'll Whatever (you think is discoverable,\_give it to them) (That's the bottom line) + +All: of their objections, their T-I-G objections are based upon a procedure thatc , circumstances. O 1Ssimply does not apply under these + +...4." + +SPECIAL CARNEY: Just.nn nt. Let me be sure I'm understan actly what you're saying here. I'm o• o use, as an example, the confide s rce. A st + +" k8 i € What you're s in- that, out of the 15,000 statem . th are listed here, there are vario 1 ions that are raised to various . Addressing specifically the co dential source entry, that at this point (SP.the xt step would be an in-camera inspection the court to determine whether the ..4i?,b, (::!)confidential source actually meets a privilege or not a privilege. + +> What I'm understanding the reason for an in-camera inspection would be, so that there wouldn't be a•release of the name of the confidential source until such time as the court + +2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. SCAROLA: The legal argument has been made that there is no privilege in civil litigation to protect the identity of confidential sources. I'm going to get to that argument. They have cited the cases that support the fact that confidential source information is work-product informatien. It's the work-product privilege that applies. There is no confidential source pr ege. There is a work-product privilege t t rs the identity of persons who are p n information that is not subsequently be used at trial. + +14 15 4Cctiar-If I may, goi g to address that issue and u be happy to -- + +16 SPE IAL CARNEY: Okay. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, you have the document. 'You know what the document says. You can make a determination as to whether it is covered by the work-product privilege or it is not covered by the work-product privilege based upon your review of the document in your in-camera inspection of the document. + +24 25 SPECIAL CARNEY: Before we get to that, let's cover a couple of areas right now + +makes that determination. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 that are raised by the plaintiff. One, plaintiff is indicating that there are three potential sources who could assert the privilege and there aught be some clarification in the privilege log as to which of the sources is asserting the privilege. + +7 MR. SCAROLA: Why? + +8 SPECIAL CARNEYf Well, t + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MR. SCAROLA: If it is a client rad and a claimant again Epstein, why must Brad identi e defense which client it is? Maybe ' is a lient who hasn't Trirc yet filed a clai ga Mr. Epstein. Why should Mr. Ep n b entitled to know the identity at erson who is asserting an attorne -c1 e t privilege? + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 nd this brings us to what I think is a very simpo ant and fundamental point here: The ivilege belongs to the client; it does not belong to Mr. , it does not belong to R.R.A., it does not belong to the Trustee. Mr. , R.R.A., Mr. Rothstein, the Trustee have .no ability to waive a privilege that does not belong to them. + +25 Every case that has been cited by opposing + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, And L.M., individually, + +Defendants. G \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* + +o + +FEARING BEFORE: HONORABLE \D . CROW + +DATE TAKEN: + +TIME: . to 4:45 p.m. + +PLACE: P each County Courthouse 2 N. Dixie Highway, Room 9C est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +REPORTED 44B 1(s,: C Kathleen M. Ames, RPR + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +OF: , BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S. Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 + +OF: WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Ste. 1000 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 + +L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE KNIGHT, ESQUIRE + +WEINBERG, ESQUIRE + +JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE + +10 OF: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, One Clearlake Centre, Ste. 1 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE + +15 OF: SEARCY, DE SHIPLEY 2139 Pal West .Palm , CAROLA, BARNHART & ch Lakes Boulevard each, Florida 33409 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +CO + +APPEARING ON BEHALcsse THE PLAINTIFF + +4 54 r + +ARING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +MR. ACKERMAN: Okay. We can't really effectively take discovery -- + +MR. SCAROLA: No objection. + +THE COURT: I'm sorry? + +MR. SCAROLA: No objection. + +THE COURT: Okay. + +MR. SCAROLA: I don't mean to interrupt t can 0 save some time. + +THE COURT: Okay. Let him have ve inutes and we'll come back and let you say whate •u want, Mr. Ackerman, okay. Go ahead, sir. okay. And then come + +MR. SCAROLA: Tt3 specific documents that have been identified ckerman from among those documents that hav b agreement that the ( like to use. As long as it is provided to them pursuant to an 1 ould expressly nde stood that by agreeing to the use of those specif\* do ments we have not prejudiced any assertion of priv 0 with regard to any other documents, we're prep red to allow them to use them. They are worthless. I really don't care whether he uses them or not. I just don't want to impact upon any other privilege argument that we may make by making that concession. I am obliged to make sure that we continue to protect all of our other privileges because we don't have the right to waive + +1 2 attorney-client privilege. Unlike the Fifth Amendment privilege, which is controlled by Mr. Epstein, as much as (we might like to take all of this and put it on the floor) (in this courtroom for Your Honor and everybody else in the) (world to take a look at because we have nothing to hide, we) can't do that. + +7 THE COURT: I understand that. + +8 9 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. So we're oblig our privilege. kA;t,Sert + +10 THE COURT: It's not your p + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 befo MR. SCAROLA: We privilege on behalf of our the clients who we repres but also because that material to ongoi protect the work-p ct obligatio other p ends 0 That's the position that we are in. Now, are obk fl assert the cl eCi " Not only on behalf of Ad \ llIose claims were settled formation is relevant and s against Mr. Epstein, we must privilege, as well, because of the we have to protect the interests of those ever get to questions about privilege and an obligation to prepare a privilege log, and an in camera inspection, the threshold issue is relevance. And it was as a consequence of Your Honor's recognition of the fact that there was a threshold relevance issue that Your Honor stayed enforcement of any subpoena or production request in this Court until such time as the pleadings were clarified + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +FILED +2012 MAY - 8 PM 4:02 +JIM RONK BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM +DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS** + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant [REDACTED] and for Sanctions in the above-styled case. This Court having reviewed the Motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: The Defendant + +Bradley Edwards shall within 30 +days of the date of this order file +a more complete privilege log. The Court +finds the privilege log is insufficient on its +face and does not comply with the requirements +of F.R.C.P 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp v. +Johnson, 799 Suzd 339 (Fla 4th Dec 2001). In + +Epstein v. Rothstein and [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMB/Division AG +Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions +Page 2 of 2 + +all other respects the motion is denied at this +time +**DONE AND ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida + +this 7th day of April, 2012. + +May + +![]()Copies furnished to: + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flaglet Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esq. +The L.S Law Firm +Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor +1441 Brickell Avenue +Miami, FL 33131 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +COPY + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +2012 Aug 17 PM 3:41 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CLERK + +ORDER ON OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered on August 3, 2012, on outstanding discovery motions, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that EDWARDS' Motion for Clarification is GRANTED, and this Court's Order of May 7, 2012 is vacated without prejudice. [REDACTED] shall file a written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of EPSTEIN's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's April 10, 2012 Order. The response shall identify non-privileged responsive documents previously produced, shall be accompanied by all non-privileged responsive documents not previously produced, if any, and shall identify, in a proper privilege log as referenced in this Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege. This response shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this Order. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 17th +day of Aug, 2012. + +![]()Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +**NOT A CEIR TITLED** + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +brad@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] Esquire +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com +The L-S Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305)-503-5503 +Fax: (305)-503-6801 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_44_Picture_19.jpeg) + +Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • Washington, DC • Quito, Ecuador + +James D. Silver +954.847.3324 Direct Line +jsilver@conradscherer.com + +April 8, 2011 + +VIA E-Mail:jsx@searceylaw.com + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Re: Epstein/Rothstein/ [REDACTED] + +Dear Jack: + +You sent me a proposal by letter dated April 7, 2011 regarding production to me and my firm of all of the documents that had been turned over to the Special [REDACTED], Judge Carney (the "Special [REDACTED]"), in the special master process that has been on-going before Judge Ray in the RRA bankruptcy case. We spoke by telephone at length late today and reached agreement to your proposal, subject to the modified language that we discussed. I have taken the language from your letter and revised it below based on what we had discussed. Of course, I also had to change the language to reflect that the letter is now being written by me. + +Accordingly, this letter is intended to confirm the terms and conditions of the production by your client, [REDACTED] Edwards, to us of all documents, without redaction, and notwithstanding any claim of privilege made or that could be made, that the Bankruptcy Trustee Herbert Stettin caused to be turned over or delivered to the Special [REDACTED] pursuant to the special [REDACTED] process described above and any further documents that [REDACTED] has in his possession, custody or control responsive to our subpoena (collectively, the "Epstein Related Documents"). The terms and conditions of our agreement are as follows: + +1. 1. We will stipulate to stay enforcement of our current subpoena solely as it relates to the Epstein Related Documents subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement; +2. 2. You will produce to us all of the Epstein Related Documents for an "attorneys eyes only" review with the express agreement that the production is pursuant to the common interest privilege and does not constitute a waiver of any privilege otherwise applicable to the documents; + +Established 1974 +Rex Conrad 1935-1999 | William Scherer +Conrad & Scherer, LLP | 633 South Federal Highway, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +Mailing Address | P.O. Box 14723, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33302 +Phone 954.462.5500 | Fax 954.463.9244 +www.conradscherer.com + +3. We will preserve the strict confidentiality of all materials produced to us pursuant to this agreement unless: + +- a. the same information is or was obtained from an independent source; +- b. you agree to release or modify the restriction on our use of particular materials or; C- we obtain acourt order authorizing our use of the materials or determining C1N that the materials in question are not privileged. +- d. we are compelled to produce or disclose the materials or information derived from them. + +4. We agree that neither the documents themselves nor any information obtained from the documents produced to us pursuant to this agreement, subject to paragraph 3 above, will be shared with our clients unless they expressly cis to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. + +5. No copies will be made of the documents unless one or more of the conditions of paragraph 3 above have been satisfied, or to the extent we provide copies to aclient or clients pursuant to paragraph 4 above; + +6, Nothing in this agreement will restrict our disclosing any document(s) for in camera review in connection with any privilege abjection you seek to maintain, or in connection with any request we make to use the documents without restriction and/or to determine that such documents arc not protected from disclosure by any privilege or otherwise; + +7. Stay of the aforcement of our subpoena may be lilted at any time to seek additional documents t aj,may come into your possession or control or to satisfy the conditions of Paragraph 3c; + +8. The terms of this agreement may be disclosed as we may deem appropriate, and we intend to disclose the terms to Judge Ray at Monday's hearing in connection with announcing our resolution of the issues that were to he considered at that hearing; + +In the event that any third-party socks to compel production of materials disclosed to us pursuant to this agreement, we will notify you immediately of such efforts and cooperate with you In preserving the confidentiality of documents you designate as privileged or not otherwise discoverable until such time as any one of the conditions set forth in paragraph 3 above have been satisfied; + +10. You have agreed to deliver tho Epstein Related Documents to us immediately based on our agreement with you to the terms of this agreement; and + +![](_page_45_Picture_10.jpeg) + +Jack Scorola +April 8, 2011 +Page 3 + +11. Since this agreement relates to documents requested in a bankruptcy subpoena issued by us in the RRA bankruptcy case, it is agreed and understood that all disputes relating to this agreement as well as its enforcement will be determined exclusively by Judge Ray in the RRA bankruptcy case. Without limiting the foregoing, to the extent we seek to use or disclose any of the Epstein Related Documents (and you do not consent) and/or to obtain a determination of any issues relating to any claimed privilege regarding those documents, such determinations shall be made exclusively by Judge Ray in the RRA bankruptcy case. + +If you agree with the terms and conditions set forth above, please sign this letter below and indicate that it is "Agreed" or send me an e-mail indicating your agreement. + +Very truly yours, + +![]()JDS/ra + +![](_page_46_Picture_209.jpeg) + +James D. Silver + +From: James D. Silver Sent: Sunday, April 10, 201112:45 PM To: 'Jack Scarola' Cc: brad@pathtojustice.com Subject: RE: Agreement regarding Epstein Related Documents + +Jack, + +Confirming our phone conversation of yesterday we now have an agreement and will appear at the hearing tomorrow morning where I will announce our agreement to Judge Ray. As for the issue regarding how the documents are to be provided, you will provide the electronic documents on disc and we can copy for ourselves from that disk as we deem appropriate. As for additional responsive documents that are not on disk, you agree the y can be copied by a copy service of my choosing, at my side's expense. + +I am glad that we were able to amicably resolve our Issues regarding the documents setforth In our letter agreement. Have a nice rest of your weekend and I will see you at bankrup cou tomorrow morning. + +Jim Silver + +From: Jack Scarola [mallto:JSX@SearcyLaw.com] Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:41 PM To: James D. Silver Cc: brad@pathtojustice.com Subject: Re: Agreement regarding Epstein Related + +The letter agreement as redrafted by you is acceptable with one clarification regarding paragraph 10. Electronic documents will be provided on a disc. Hard copy documents will biinade available for your inspection and copying at your expense- rather than we being required to "deliver" the documents to + +Original Message --- From: James D. Silver SiSilver@tco COMP To: Jack Scarola Sent: Fri Apr 08 20:11:36 20 Subject: Agreement regardlog tcIn Related Documents + +Jack, + +Sec attached letter eZ1116know if it accurately sets forth the terms of our agreement. As we were finalizing the document we had a computer issu Word version was lost. Due to the lateness of the hour we did not want to retype the entire letter. As a result, I was unable to correct the mistake in your c-mail address listed on my letter but the correct one is on this eqnall. Also, we had to whiteout the "y" In delivery on the second to last page of paragraph 9 since we couldn't correct it on the document. I wanted to let you know so that it does not look like the document had been altered. + +Please let me know as soon as you can if we are in agreement. My cell number is 305-588-5664. + +Jim Silver + +'•• eSafc scanned this email for malicious content ••• ••• IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders •.' + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_49_Picture_0.jpeg) + +Conrad Si. Scherer + +Attorneys at Law + +Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • Washington, DC • Quito, Ecuador + +. I. y ; I ') + +• June'7,2011 '. + +Via and U.S. Mall • :s •• + +Steven Jaffe, Esq. + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, + +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 North Andrews Avenue + +Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +William R. Scherer • 954.847.3362 Direct Line wscherer@con emu= + +Re: In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., •Case No.: 09-3479I-BKC-RBR + +(Review of Epstein related documents), + +File No. 09-444B + +Dear Steve: ?c + +I ant troubled by our discussfik ay afternoon with respect to the copying of the documents identified for copying within the fourteen boxes of documents related to the Epstein cases, as well as, the dispute concerning the production of the 27,000 plus c-mails or pages of cmails which were to be transferred on to the thumb drive provided by my office. + +A lawyer and paralegal from my office spent the entirety of last week at your firm reviewing the contents of the fourteen boxes and marked certain documents as important for further investigation. You are now insisting that the copying process, which was initially agreed upon (two boxes in and two boxes out), be suspended until we agree to provide you with a disk of all the documents we tabbed for further investigation. This suspension of copying along with the failure to provide the c-mails to us is in direct violation of the agreement we reached with Jack Scarola by virtue of the correspondence by James Silver, dated April 8, 2011 and finalized by the email exchange, dated April 10, 2011, both of which are attached to this correspondence. It should be considered that compliance with this agreement has required the investment of resources on our side. Additionally, the agreement specifically provides that all disputes will be resolved by Judge Ray. + +We now demand that you provide li l the boxes we reviewed (to preclude any possibility of investigation by you of our work product) to the copy service by the close of business today + +Established 1974 + +Rex Conrad 1935-1999 I William Scherer + +Conrad & Scherer, LLP I 633 South Federal Highway, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Mailing Address I P.O. Box 14723. Fort Lauderdale, FL. 33302 + +Steven Jaffe, Esq. + +June 7, 2011 + +Page 2 of 2 + +and provide us with the c-mails which are the subject of our initial agreement. In short — we arc requesting you comply with the agreement. + +In the event the documents are not provided in their entirety to the copy service and the cmails provided to us, we will file the appropriate motion before the Court and seek sanctions for the time invested last week which was intended to ensure compliance with our initial agreement. + +Furthermore, our review of the documents has indicated that certain documents may be missing from the boxes. For example, we have not located the deposition transcript of Dave Rogers or the entirety of the exhibits to his deposition. We request that all documents which had been contained within the fourteen boxes be provided to us immediately. + +WRS/pk + +End. + +cc: Esq. + +I look forward to speaking with you in the hopes of resolving this dispute. + +Respectfully submit cc + +ake O'd + +William R. Scherer + +For the/..S , + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +James D. Silver Esq. + +Jessica L. MI Esq. + +![](_page_50_Picture_17.jpeg) + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN MD FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.50 2009CA0408003000CME AO Comics Lillgadas, Pla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOWME I OF ILL + +individually, and LM. + +Defendant. + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OP BRINDLEY 1:131)WkIDS; ESQUIRE + +Tuesday, Minh 23, 20010 10:00 tt 5:07 p.m + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes, Boulevard West Palm Bach, Florida 33401 + +Reporteda,\_ Cynthia, RPR, PPR Notary Public, State ofElcuida Prose Court Reporting Job No.: 1333 + +## 1 APPEARANCES: + +2 On behalf °DM Plaintiff: 3 ROBERT D. CIUTION, JR, ESQUIRE BURM.AN, CIUTION, I.UTTIER& COLEMAN. LIP 4 303 Banyan I3oulevard Suite 400 5 West Palm Bash, Florida 33401 Phone: 561.8422820 + +6 + +7 and • 8 JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, WE ATIERBURY, GO/DBERGER P.A. 9 250 Austullan Avenue South Suite 1400 . • to West Palm Beach, Melds 3)014012. Phone: 5516568300 + +11 + +12 and 13 On behalf ciao PlaiMrn 14 ALAN ht DERSHOWITZ, QUIRE HARVARD LAW SCEOOL + +15 Hamer 520 Carnbridge,Manttetatsetts 02138 16 Phone 617.496.2020 ' 17 On behalf of the Defadarm + +18 JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 'SEARCY. DENNEY, SCAROLA, 19 BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boukrard 20 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: 561.6866300 + +ALSO PRESENT: rose sporting Kozak, Videograber Services + +3 + +W 4 + +5 EXAMINATION DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT + +6 + +# INDEX + +7 + +a, ESQUIRE + +BY MR. CR1TTON 5 + +# EXHIBITS' + +EXHIBIT DESCRIPT1 4%,0B + +PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 ALFRED. DRIOUP2 211. 16 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 COMPLAINT • 239 17 PLAINTIFFS EX 3" JULY22, 2009 276 FACSMILE + +T14/ .1 + +# PROCEEDINGS + +Deposition taken before Cynthia, Registered Professional Reporter and Florida Professional Reporter, and Notary Public in and for, the State of Florida at large, in the above cause. + +- - - THE VID13OGRAPHER: We are now on video record. This is Media NS. videotaped deposition of in the matter of Scott Rothstein, J. , and L.M. + +Today is Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010 at + +10:00 a.m. Were here in the law offices + +of Searcy, Denney, Scazola, Barnhart & + +Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, + +West Palm Beach, Florida. + +My name is Joe Kozak I am the + +pher. The court reporter is Cindy + +from Prose, Prose Court Reporting + +Age-tleY• + +Will counsel please introduce + +yourselves, and then the court reporter + +will swear in the witnesses. + +MR. CR1TTON: Bob Critton on behalf of the + +tes.T•tilhlatied-11ama.ci.e.tia..01. •••••••WaspandaralsualSilholiamiala + +1 A. I don't know that that's a correct statement. 2 Q. You don't know one way or the other? 3 A. The law firm was constantly expanding and 4 constantly under construction. For the most part in the 5 beginning the cases were kept in a, in a filing cabinet 6 in my office and later were kept in a filing cabinet, I 7 believe, in a locked storage location in another area of 8 the office. 9 Q. And did any attorney have access to that 10 storage area or do you know? 11 A. I believe any attorney could have had access. 12 Q. And if the attorney could have access, you 13 wouldn't necessarily know about it, true? 14 A. Correct. 15 Q. In the trustee's filing that they made in 16 response to my motion to preserve evidence, they 17 indicated that 13 boxes relating to Jeffrey Epstein 18 had been removed by the FBI or the government when 19 they came into the RRA. offices. Do you remember 20 seeing that pleading? 21 A. No. 22 Q. Okay. Are you, were there, in fact, 13 23 boxes of material or at least 13 banker's boxes of 24 material that related to matters directed to, 25 whether, whatever the content related to Mr. Epstein + +1 did they also have swipe cards so that they could 2 access different areas in the firm? 3 A. I believe so. 4 Q. With regard to when you joined RRA, did 5 you ever have any further meetings with 6 Mr. Rothstein; that is, from the day you started at 7 REA, did you ever meet Mr. Rothstein again? 8 A. By meet him again - 9 Q. Did you ever have a meeting with him again 10 regarding your position in the firm? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Okay. Did you ever meet with him and a 13 number of other individuals with regard. to firm 14 business? 15 A. No. 16 Q. Firm cases? 17 A. I don't believe so. 18 Q. Was Mr. Rothstein ever present in any 19 meeting where any of your cases were discussed? Let 20 me strike that. Was Mr. Rothstein ever present 21 wherein at any meeting where any of the cases 22 against Jefficy Epstein were discussed? Don't tell 23 me content; just was he ever present. 24 A. How would I know that? I don't know. Ile 25 could, he could be in a meeting right now where the case + +1 that you were aware of; that is, hard copies? 2 A. I don't know. 3 Q. Okay. Could have been more, could have 4 been less; you just don't know? 5 A. Correct. 6 Q. If I understood your testimony, 7 Mr. Rothstein, Mr. Rosenfeldt, any other attorney or 8 investigator could have accessed those files 9 depending or where they were within the firm, true? 10 A. I am not sure exactly who could have accessed 11 it. You asked me if the attorneys could and the 12 attorneys had swipe cards for various locked areas. 13 Each attorneyI believe had access to any area where 14 those files were located. I believe so. 15 Q. Okay. Well, during the time you were 16 there did an individual by the name of Ken Jenne 7 work there? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. Okay. Did an individual by the name of 20 Mike Fisten work for the firm -- 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. — for RRA? Were they employees of the 23 firm or were they independent contractors? 24 A. I don't know. 25 Q. Okay. During the time they were there, + +1 could be discussed for all I know. 2 Q. I'm sorry. Obviously, where you, where 3 you were present. &There you ever present at al 4 (meetingwhere WILRothsten —r7 vu — also present why 5 (the Epstein cases were discussed?) 6 (A Not 7 Q. Did he ever call you to communicate with 8 you, call you either by phone, video conference, in 9 any fashion to discuss any act aspect of the cases .10 that you had against Jeffrey Epstein? 11 MR. SCAROLA: You can answer that. 12 THE WITNESS: He has communicated about .13 various, about legal issues related to the case 14 as well as commented about the case to me on 15 very few occasions but I would say less than 16 three times. 17 BY MR. CRITTON: 18 Q. During the time that you, from April of 19 '09 through late October of '09, correct? 20 A. In that time period, where, is that when 21 these 22 Q. Correct. 23 • A. things happened? 24 Q. Well, that's the time you were there; 25 that's what I am asking. + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +/ + +.9 + +VOLIt , + +VIDEOTP?t SITION + +(EDWAIIDS) + +en on Behalf of Plaintiff + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 2 3 time that you were interviewing that he would make the monthly payments or he would pay whatever that amount was off? + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A My meeting with him was about 10 minutes. And what he said was, do you have a line of credit? c Don't worry about it. It will be paid off at so2 e point in time that you are at this firm. We go ng to treat you fairly. That was it. There specifics about it. Nobody laid out th('credit line. It wasn't that kind of meeting. c + +11 Q I got it. + +12 13 off during the time thad4: & /14 L Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +sense. If you think what just said, if it's not filed it and I con 4c MR. LINK: Your Honor, t nly makes r. Scarola e cause when I th the lawsuit, then there was Aaver robable cause. + +(FOE) (true.) (cause) (Kg( on tW•(d)(EITel)(W: - no prol5W51-e) (initiate)(this)(proceeding, (there) (prba151-e)(cause)(t-(5) CarrifiTrtfle (fife) was proceediircO (The)(initiation)(arid)(continuation C(ID (the) procee 17114)(caused)(daTh7Eg3(t15) (5AtiTh (because) no @Yo15115re) (cause) (eriegfar) (S5)(it) (15151-15) (initiated) (continued)(n1(ere)(absence p(5T) + +(MR7)(SCAROEKO @p7,)(Yor)(florcCr7) Et) is + +But th n \*nuation isn't I filed it and it s ave been eliminated that day. The sacond day after the lawsuit it's been continued. + +THE COURT: I will give you two minutes Oo wrap up. We had planned on 40 minutes. l, We are now going on 55. But again, I want to give both sides the opportunity -- + +o? + +MR. LINK: I appreciate that. + +THE COURT: I have read the materials and I have heard the arguments. I don't + +# EXHIBIT J + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA0408003CXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +# JOINT PRETRIAL S + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Special! ury Trial Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and Defendant/ aintiff C hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Stipulation. + +A + +Goes + +- A. List of All Pending Mo trial of this matter is special set to commence on March 13, 2018. The parties tici to that additional Motions will be filed before that date. Presently, the following ions/Requests are pending: + - 1. 9/21 +- a. Ed 7/1 ds' four Motions to Compel and the following relatecal: , Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to Four O M ons to Compel. /17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential ettlement Agreement Against and His Counsel and the following related filing: + - a. 11/8/17, Response in Opposition. + - 3. 10/26/17, Motion for Protective Order. + - 4. 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/15/17, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery; + +- b. 9/25/17, EFS -esMotion to Compel Discovery Responses from and +- c. 9/28/17, Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motio to Compel Discovery Responses. +- 5. 11/8/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Flo 90.202 and 90.203, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection to Request + - b. 11/28/17, Epstein's Notice of Filing Supplement al Notice; and +- y. tatutes Section +- 6. 11/13/17, Motion in Limine Address' ope of Admissible Evidence and the following firelated lings: + - a. 11/17/17, Supplement to imine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; + - b. 11/22/17, Epstein's Oppositio ' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evide + - c. 4 12/11/17, Sec Scope of Admissible E +- 7. 11/17/17, following related +- a. 11/13/17, E ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Notice of Production from Non-Parties and the otice of Production from Non-Parties. +- 8. 11/22/17, stein's equest for Judicial Notice. +- 9. 12/1/ , Ed s' Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission. +12/4/17, Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege. +- 12. 12/4/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. +- 13. 12/8/17, Notice of Filing Preliminary Objections and Counter Designations to Epstein's Deposition Designations. +- 14. 12/15/17, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness +- 10. 1 wards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery nses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II — V only). + +# B. Stipulated Facts: + +- 1. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea for one count Amm\ ny licitation of prostitution, a third-degree felony, and one count of pr person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a second-degree felony. 107.) +- 2. was admitted to The Florida Bar in March 07 ( ' 11/10/17 Depo. 43:10-12.) +- 3. After being admitted to the Florida Bar orked as an Assistant State Atte at the Broward State Afton% for approximately three years. 5/15/13 Depo. 6:11-15; /10/17 Depo. 50:3-5.) +- 4. After leaving the Broward S 's Office, went to work for the law firm of Kubicki Dra he worked for approximately three handling insurance defe al 5/15/13 Depo. 7:3-10; 11/10/17 Depo. 56:10 117\W hik an employee of RRA, represented himself to the public, including Epstein, as a partner of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 189:22-192:9.) +- 5. formed united liability company on April 16, 2007, by the name of "The Law O Brad & Associates, LLC." (Sunbiz.org.) +- 6. rking at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA") in April 2009 Ed s' 3/23/10 Depo. 13:19-22.) +- 7. association with RRA terminated at the end of October or beginning of mber 2009. ( 3/23/10 Depo. 15:5-11.) +- 9. Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 267:12-13.) +- 10. Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license in November 2009 and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 25, 2009. (11/25/09 Opinion, The Florida Bar v. Rothstein, Supreme Court of Florida, Case No. SC09- 2146.) + +- 11. Rothstein was arrested and arraigned in federal court in Broward Co ty, Florida on December 1, 2009. (12/1/09 Information, United States ofAmeri a Rothstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case N 1 (D.E. I).) +- 12. In August and September 2008, while working at The La o Brad & Associates, LLC, filed three separate laws Epstein on behalf of three separate clients: L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. (8 Complaint, Jane Doe + - v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern 'strict of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 (D.E. 1); 9/11/08 Com t, LM. v. Jeffiey Epstein, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Coun e po. 50-2008-CA-028051 (D.E. 4); 9/11/08 Complaint, E.W. v. Jeffrey 5''' Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-C #1: , E. 4).) +- 13. E stein does not admit or deny when he was a sole and Jane Doe). However filed the lawsuits agai +- 14. While an emplo Jane Doe cases +- 15. While an e stmOd A litik'tic) t erointlibee hal . allegations ofhis in the three ollaiewsotsui(tLbromuttwby es not challenge good faith when he pstein. 11/20/17 Depo. 78:3-6; 120:11-18.) Mists the lead attorney on the L.M., E.W. and of RRA, was the sole employee of RRA who made ions on the L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases against Epstein. 1 /20/17 Depo. 85:2-15.) 16.E an employee of RRA, did not represent any individuals other than , E.W. and Jane Doe with regard to claims against Epstein. ( 3/23/10 po. 291:8; 11/10/17 Depo. 77:1-7.) +- 17. On July 24, 2009, while was employed by RRA, a Complaint was filed on behalf of L.M. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (7/24/09 Complaint, L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 (D.E. 1).) +- 18. L.M. already had a state court action pending against Epstein at the time the July 24, 2009, federao Complaint was filed which was based on the same facts and circumstances. 11/10/17 Depo. 316:11-20.) + +- 19. never formally served Epstein with the federal Complaint t was filed on behalf of L.M. against Epstein. al 5/15/13 Depo. 34:10 +- 20. L.M.'s July 24, 2009, federal Complaint against Epstein allege her into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engage intercourse with Epstein and she never touched his geni Complaint 142(j) (D.E. 19).) Epstein forced I or vaginal Answer to +- 21. While was employed by RRA he mad emston to take the deposition of three pilots who had flown, at different lanes used by Epstein, and am deposition of a fourth pilot Answer to Complaint 1 36 e litigation against Epstein. +- 22. On August 24, 2009, L.M. not sitions of Epstein's pilots Paul Visoski, Jr., and David rs. L.M. requested they produce "[a]ll original flight logs from 4 , 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets w piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffre or Ghislaine Maxwell." (8/24/09 Notices of Deposition and Su ces Tecums, L M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm l h nty, Case No. 50-2008-C A-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 114, 11 +- 23. In August pile was employed by RRA, he noticed the deposition of Id p in the Jane Doe litigation. (8/11/09 and 8/24/09, Re-Notices of T Videotaped Depositions, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District +- 24. Cie them District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893.) was employed by RRA, he served Answers to Interro atones on half of L.M. and E.W. indicating that he intended to call Bill who was the governor of New Mexico a, as a trial witness as part of clients' litigation against Epstein. Answer to Complaint 140 (D.E. 19).) +- 25. a three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) never testified that they had sex with a celebrity, dignitary or international figure associated with Epstein. a 11/10/17 Depo. 167:21-168:10.) +- 26. In August 2009, a, on behalf of his client E.W., served a Request for Entry Upon Land seeking to inspect Epstein's entire home and property and to take videos + +and photograph it. (8/10/09, Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 143).) + +1. 27. On August 20, 2009, the Court in the E.W. matter noted that E.W.'s request to inspect Epstein's entire home and property was withdrawn. (8/20/09, Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 151).) +2. 28. In August and September 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's medical records from Stephen Alexander, Bruce W. Markowitz and Charles J. Galecki. The Subpoenas sought, "[t]he complete medical file including MRIs, scans, X-rays and any other diagnostic test result, Intake Form, notes, reports, opinions, correspondence to or from third parties, correspondence to or from Jeffrey Epstein, referrals, medical bills, in short, your complete file." (8/19/09 and 9/11/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 105, 127, 129).) +3. 29. On August 14, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's prescription history from Lewis Pharmacy and Greens Pharmacy. The Subpoenas sought, "[a] complete computer printout of any and all prescriptions for medication, name and type of prescription, and all other documentation or information on or regarding Jeffrey Epstein." (8/14/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 97, 100).) +4. 30. On April 24, 2007, L.M., before she was a client of [REDACTED], provided a statement to the FBI. +5. 31. In September 2009, while [REDACTED] was employed by RRA, his client, L.M., testified at a deposition in her case against Epstein. +6. 32. On June 19, 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his Jane Doe client, filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure + +Potential Judgment. (6/19/09 Motion, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-\$0119 (D.E. 165).) + +- 33. In July Jane Doe). 20101.in settled the claims of three die .W., L.M. and 11/10/17 Depo. 305:2-3.) +- 34. The Ponzi scheme through which Rothstein misrep investors began in 2005 and ended in October 2009. for Forfeiture In Rem 1 13, United States v. R Rothstein, United States District Court, Sout CV-61780 (D.E. 1).) +- 35. On November 20, 2009, certain Rothstein in the Seventeenth Ju Florida. This lawsuit was p (11/20/09 Complaint, Razor Judicial Circuit C 062009CA062943 ms and defrauded Verified Complaint operties Purchased by Scott 'et of Florida, Case No. 09 f Rothstein's Ponzi scheme sued Ire ft Court, in and for Broward County, ublic record as of the date it was filed. ing, LLC, et at v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 17th ward County, Florida, Case No. +- 36. The United S govAfttfient filed an Information against Rothstein on or about December 1, 2 s criminal charge was public record as of the date it was filed. (12/ /09 In ation, United States of America v. Rothstein, United States District Co uthern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331.) +38. ',ember 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (12/21/09 Answer and Counterclaim, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 19).) +- 37. O ember 7 2009, Epstein filed a civil Complaint in this action against and L.M. (12/7/09 Complaint, Jetey Epstein v. Scott tein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 09CA40800XXXM13 (D.E. 5).) +- 39. represented L.M. in this litigation. ( 11/10/17 Depo. 255:5-11.) a +- 40. did not charge L.M. for his representation of her in this litigation. 11/10/17 Depo. 255:12-19; 257:23-258:1.) + +1. 41. [REDACTED] did not enter into any written representation agreement with L.M. concerning his representation of her in this litigation. ([REDACTED] 11/10/17 Depo. 255:20-256:8; 258:2-4.) +2. 42. On January 21, 2010, a Default was entered against Rothstein in this litigation as to all claims in the December 7, 2009, Complaint against Rothstein. (1/21/10 Default, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 27).) +3. 43. In early August 2010, L.M. and Epstein entered into a Stipulation for Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Individually, Only. (8/5/10 Stipulation, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 112).) +4. 44. On August 9, 2010, the Court entered a Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. Only approving L.M. and Epstein's Stipulation. (8/9/10 Final Order, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 113).) +5. 45. On January 5, 2011, Epstein moved to amend his Complaint, to eliminate certain paragraphs. (1/5/11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 195).) +6. 46. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothstein and Edwards for abuse of process. (4/12/11 Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 303).) +7. 47. On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint, which was corrected on August 24, 2011, bringing a claim for abuse of process against [REDACTED] and for conspiracy to commit abuse of process against Rothstein. (8/22/11 Second Amended Complaint and 8/24/11 Notice of Scrivener's Error and Corrected Second Amended Complaint, *Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al.*, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 368, 370).) + +- 48. On November 3, 2011, moved for Final Summary Judgment on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. (11/3/11 Renewed Motion for Find Summary Judgment, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al., 15th Judicial Circ ourt, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 401).) +- 49. appeared in this action as his own co-counsel on the suit against him was dismissed. ( 11/10/1 Notice of Appearance, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothste Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA408 +- 50. On July 26, 2012, the Court set the hearing o Summary Judgment to be held on Augus Motion to Reschedule Hearing, Jeffi• Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach (D.E. 512).) +- 51. Epstein dismissed his claim 2012. (8/16/12 Notice o et al., 15th Judie 502009CA40800 +- 52. inco the present than January 20 2012, before :7-22; 3/27/12 Judicial Circuit B (D.E. 468).) ' Renewed Motion for Final (7/26/12 Order on + - v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15 ase No. 502009CA40800XXXMB our prejudice against on August 16, Dismissal, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. . 519).) lawyer has been collective) greater from January 2010 to as from 2002 when started practicing law through wards' 11/10/17 Depo. 47:10-14; 49:4-13.) +- 53. s is not claiming a loss of income as a result of his reputation being injured ps n's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. 10/10/13 Depo. 1-22.) +wards has not seen a doctor or taken any medication as a result of the anxiety caused by this lawsuit. ( ' 5/15/13 Depo. 57:23-58:5; 11/10/17 Depo. 112:11-20.) + +**C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:** + +1. Case Against Rothstein. What, if any, damages were sustained by Epstein and proximately caused by Rothstein? ([REDACTED] does not agree with this language for the reason that the issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Ponzi scheme. It is [REDACTED] position that failure to limit the issue in this way as to Rothstein has the potential of confusing the jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable cause to claim damages against [REDACTED] arising out of the same circumstances.) + +2. Malicious Prosecution Counterclaim. The following are issues of fact for determination at trial on [REDACTED] Counterclaim against Epstein: + +A. Epstein's Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were not sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against [REDACTED] was supported by existing facts and, thus, Epstein did not have probable cause to institute his civil proceeding. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +Edwards' Alternate Position: Whether, in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against [REDACTED], the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were insufficient to support a belief on the part of a reasonably cautious person that [REDACTED] had engaged in conduct that supported Epstein's claims against [REDACTED]. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction. The parties agree that, in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether probable cause existed to support the institution of the civil proceeding brought by Epstein against [REDACTED] is an issue of law to be determined by the Court.) + +B. If Epstein had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against [REDACTED] at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding + +against [REDACTED], based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against [REDACTED] was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring [REDACTED] or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +[REDACTED] Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against Edwards resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. ([REDACTED] disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +E. Whether Epstein's civil proceeding against [REDACTED] was terminated in favor of [REDACTED]. ([REDACTED] contends this is a legal issue for determination by the Court.) + +F. Whether the institution or continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] was a substantial contributing cause of damage to [REDACTED] and, but for the malicious institution or continuation of the proceeding, [REDACTED] damage would not have occurred. + +G. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate [REDACTED] for his compensatory damages that resulted from Epstein's institution or continuation of the civil proceeding against [REDACTED]. + +- D. Exhibit Lists (with OW Exhibit Lists and to ide disclosed and/or provid +- H. Whether Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduc reckless disregard or gross negligence which was a substantial cause of d: ages. +- I. Whether punitive damages are warranted as punislune in for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against ds d/or as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding wi ble cause. +- J. Whether the claimed damage is a result of state made after the institution of the civil proceeding and are thu ro ted by the litigation privilege, even if any such statements to untrue. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Ins ut disputes it is appropriate because he believe Amended Complaints are "statements made after the i ut the civil proceeding" and are afforded no protection by th privilege.) +- K. Bifurcated Proceeding: ount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages 7 a punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceed\* againsPEdwards and/or as a deterrent to others. Nile parties do not waive their right to amend their onal objections for those exhibits that have not yet been rrespond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + - I. 't List and Epstein's Objections are attached as Composite Exc. + - 2. ein Exhibit List and Objections are attached as Composite it B. +- E. Lists: The parties do not waive their right to amend their Witness Lists. Witness List is attached as Exhibit C. + - 2. Epstein's Witness List is attached as Exhibit D. +- F. Estimated Trial Time: estimates 10 trial days; Epstein estimates 15-20 trial days. + +# G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case: + +For Jeffrey Epstein: Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 + +For J. Jack Scarola David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev 41. A Telephone: (561) 686-6300 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +# H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three. + +# 1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities + +- sed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite Exhi it E. +- 2. proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite bi F. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein and* [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Joint Pretrial Stipulation +Page 14 + +DATED: December 22, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +(561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +![]()LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link, with permission +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT K + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA individually, ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TFLIAL II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on July 6, 2O17 on Counter-Plaintiff, J. , Motion to Set Cause for Trial and the Court's Motion to Determine Nee or Discovery/Motion Scheduling Order and the court having reviewed the Motion, heard argument and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 5, 2O17, at 9:3O a.m., (1O days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 2O5 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 334O1., + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL the panics shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses.of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL the parties shall exeliange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - 1. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +1. 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and +2. 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. + +D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall confer and: + +1. 1. discuss settlement; +2. 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; +3. 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; and +4. 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. + +E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the duty of counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + +1. 1. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubert Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. +2. 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; +3. 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; +4. 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; +5. 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; +6. 6. a statement of estimated trial time; +7. 7. names of attorneys to try case; +8. 8. number of peremptory challenges per party; and +9. 9. each party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authority, as schedules attached to the Stipulation. + +F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. + +G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. + +**H. DISCOVERY.** Unless permitted by court order, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR TRIAL, ABSENT A TRUE EMERGENCY, FAILURE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR CONTINUANCE. + +1. I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pre-trial conference. +2. J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to trial, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +3. K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +4. L. PREMARKING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. +5. M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than trial, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +### III. MEDIATION + +A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + +1. 1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. +2. 2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE, all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. +3. 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. +4. 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), unless waived. + +B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (f), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall be paid \$175.00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. + +C. Completion of mediation prior to trial is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate in mediation, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings may be stricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. + +D. Any party opposing mediation may proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1,700(b). + +### IV. NONCOMPLIANCE + +**NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING OF THE CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER SANCTIONS AS ARE JUST.** + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 20th day of July, 2017. + +![](_page_80_Picture_3.jpeg) + +JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +# Copies furnished to: + +- .170 Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) 17 James (brad@pathtojustice.com) John Scarola (mep@searcylaw.com) 'S < I)41 ITE.COM) 17 Fred Haddad (haddadfm@aol.com) I ACKERMAN, JR (JACKERMAN@F24 17 Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.comV 17 \ Matthew D Weissing (matt@pathtojustice.com) PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) +- service@jurytrial.co S, Adler. (servicegurytrialcom) Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonjä@tonJahaddad.com) +- William Bennette (wbk@searcylaw.com) 17 William Chester Brewer, Jr. (wcblaw@aolcom) William B. King Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) fr; John Scarola (jcarolateam@searcylaw.com) +- **Rodney G Rdinanci (alex@matrixmediation.com) 17 John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com) Fred Haddad (Dee@fredhaddadlaw.com) 17 James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com) Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com)** 17 Fred Haddad (fredhaddad@fredhaddadlaw.com) + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +F F F F F FF F JaymeMi Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com) Andrew A Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.com) Philip M Burlington (kbt@flappellatelaw.com) Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com) Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) Bradley (staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) W Chester= Jr (wcblawasst@grnail.com) + +CO 'S iS C) ) + +# **EXHIBIT L** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X7GOCMBAG + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN' SIESTF Ci RIAL EXHIBITS, TRIAL WITNESSES AND EXPERT wrtritSsa + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("EpsteirC) h, /files his list of trial exhibits, trial witnesses, and expert witnesses purs Court's Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and Mediation Pr follows: + +# TRIAL E + +- 1. Information Charging S Rothstein in United States of America v. Stott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-C December 1, 2009. +- 2. Plea Agreemen w nited States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed 1, 2009. +- 3. Amended •otgplaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et at v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, in the Cit6uit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Fl pease No. 09-062943 (19). +- 4. All Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in in re: Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, Pt,t 4791-RBR and any and all ancillary cases related thereto, including, but not ed\t01, Razorback Funding, LW, a at v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09- 062.4 +- 5. The videotaped deposition and all exhibits as referenced/used in the Deposition of Scott W. Rothstein taken by Epstein on June 14, 2012. +- 6. Privilege Log of , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, Dated February 23, 2011 as filed in this matter and in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.; 09-34791-RBR. + - 7. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. + +8. Any and all exhibits listed and/or used by J. + +9. All Depositions taken of J. in the case and chief and the Counterclaim in this matter, via videotape or transcription, including all exhibits used/referenced therein. + +10. All documents and exhibits provided by J. in this matter. + +11. Transcripts of all depositions taken in the Plaintiff/Counter-Defenti?nt's case in chief and the Counterclaim filed by J. including alb& ibits marked at said depositions. + +12. All of Answers to Interrogatories, Respons uests for Production, and Response to Requests for Admissions. + +13. Complaints and Docket from L.M. v. Jeffre Snipht 09-CV-81092- COHN; and 502008 CA 018051 XXXXMB. + +14. Subpoena(s)/Notice(s) for Deposition o QbRal rump, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Mark Epstein. + +15. Subpoena to Leonard Baird. + +16. Notices to produce med\* cords to Charles J. Galecki, M.D., Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D. and Steven R. Al :D. + +17. Any and all extikts/dor ments/pleadings referenced in Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment as to cl'ar& 's Counterclaim. + +18. Deposition fldck (John) Scarola dated July 2, 2013 taken in In re: &Assent Rosenfeld\dkr, PA; 09-34791-RBR. + +19.\*N. 20 S9 nshots of the Farmer Jaffe Weissing firm website in which Epstein's A nam + +4 fiRA \rem Directory dated October 23, 2009. + +M. Screenshots of the Jaffe Weissing firm, including its attorneys' Facgmok pages, and other social media, in which Epstein's name appears. + +The Defendants reserve the right to produce any newly discovered evidence upon proper notice. + +U + +The Defendants reserve the right to produce any exhibits used for impeachment or rebuttal. + +The Defendants reserve the right to amend and/or supplement this Exhibit List as information becomes available upon proper notice. + +All exhibits expected to be offered at trial by the Defendants, except tho u ed for impeachment, will be made available for inspection at the offices of th ed at a mutually convenient time and date. + +# TRIAL WITNESSES + +- I. Scott W. Rothstein do Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 2. Ken Jenne do Broward Co. Sheriff 2601 W. Broward B1 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 433 }3 +- 3. William Scher do ConradtCgc r, PB Box 14923,E Ft. udesdale; FL 33302-4723 +- 4. Spent p uvin e Law Office of Craig Goldenfarb, P.A. 2990 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 402 West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6512 Katherine Ezcll do Podhurst Orseck PA 25 W. Flagler St. Miami, FL 33130-1712 +- 6. Ami Ederi Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office 1350 NW12th Avenue Miami, FL 33136-2102 + +- 7. Kikka Claudio Address unknown at this time +- 8. Paul Cassell Borton Petrini, LLP 1320 Columbia Street, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92101-3436 +- 9. Margaret Berk 5925 Kaiser Lane Pensacola, FL 32507-8319 +- 10. Mercedes Address unknown at this Lime +- 11. Jacquie Address unknown at this time +- 12. Adam Horowitz do Herman, Mermelstein & 3351 NW Boca Raton B1v Boca Raton, FL 33431- +- 13. Stuart Mermelstein do Herman, M & Horowitz, P.A. 3351 NW Bo lvd. Boca Rato 1-6623 +- 14. Lisa ivexa do U Scetomey's Office 40 9 venue, Suite A 961 ashville, Tennessee 37203 Jack Kill Address unknown nt this Lime Carolyn Address unknown at this Lime Robert Josetberg Address unknown at this Lime Richard Willits Richard H. Willits, P.A. + +490 Way Pante Vedra, FL 32081-0619 + +19.. William J. Berger Weiss Handler & Cornwell PA 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A Boca Raton, FL 33431-7391 OR Greenspoon Marder PA 100 W. Oipress Creek Road, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-2195 + +U + +20 Bert Patton. Address unknown at this time + +21.. Susan K. Stilling Promise Healthcare, Inc. 999 NW 5Ig Street Boca Raton, FL. 33431-4477 + +- 22. Mane Yarzabal Address unknown at this time + +23: Barry 6740 Chimere Terra 'Boynton Beach, 91 + +- 24. Allan Garte Atto 1000 SW ue, Suite 600 Portl on 972044936 + +TechnologyWay, Suite 6.30 Raton, FL 33431-3351 + +Christina Fitch Address unknown 'at this time + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lerhman 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +- 28. Denis Kleinfeld 1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 32"d Floor + +Miami, FL 34905 + +29. Steve [REDACTED], Esq. +533 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +30. Carl Linder +Linder Law Group +175 SW 7th Street, Suite 2410 +Miami, FL 33130-2966 + +31. Cara [REDACTED] +15751 Sheridan Street, PMB 129 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331-3486 + +32. Jonathan Birkman +Quraishi & Birkman, PLLC +809 SE 8th Street +Deerfield Beach, FL 33441-5608 + +33. Robert C. Buschel +Buschel Gibbons, P.A. +100 SE Third Avenue, Suite 1300 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394-0002 + +34. Beth Williamson +1306 Cormorant Road +Delray Beach, FL 33444-3328 + +35. Mike Fisten +Blue Line Investigations +13762 West State Road #84 +Suite 421 +Davie, Florida 33325 + +36. Josh [REDACTED] +Kirschbaum, Birnbaum, Lippman, & Gregoire +1301 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 230 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2111 + +37. Robin T. Kempner +Address unknown at this time + +38. Pat [REDACTED] +Address unknown at this time + +39. Amy Swan + +Address unknown at this time + +- 40. Pat Drug Enforcement Administration 2100 N. Commence Parkway. Weston, FL 33326-3234 +- 41. Jeffrey Sonn Broward Financial Centre 500 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394-3055 +- 42. Tami Wolfe Morrow, Milberg & Wolfe 499 NW 70i6 Avenue, Suite 108 Plantation, FL 33317-7572 +- 43. Steven Jaffee Jaffe, Weissing, Fis an 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-326 +- 44. Marc Nurik c/o Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc One E. Broward B Ft. Lauderdale, +- 45. Nom Batia Address u +- 46. Prise' cimento ddre kunknown at this time bel Matiska Address unknown at this time 00 55jek at this time +- 48. Michael Wheeler Department of Juvenile Justice 2737 Centerview Drive, Suite 3220 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0999 +- 49. Berger Address unknown at this time +- 50. Shawn Gilbert + +0 + +Address unknown at this time + +- 51. Ronald Wise Address unknown at this time +- 52. Wayne Black Address unknown at this time +- 53. Preve Banyon Funding, LLC 2455 E. Sunrise Blvd., Penthouse Suite + +- 54. Kendall Coffey Coffey Burlington PL 2699 S. Bayshore Dr., Penthouse Miami, FL 33133-5408 + +- 55. Seth Lehrman Jaffe Weissing Fistos 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-326 + +- 56. Phaedra Xanthos Address unknown at thi + +- 57. Scott Address unknoi, time + +- 58. Alfredo Ittieuez Address unk ortii at this time + +- 59. Earleiirn to ubic raper 1E. Browatd Blvd., Suite 1600 Fsn't Lauderdale, FL 33301-1845 + +Ted Morse Morse Operations 1240 N Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 + +- 61. Carolyn, Legal Assistant to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel Jay Howell & Associates, PA 6444 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211-3108 + +62. Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates, PA +6444 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211-3108 + +63. Alan Sakowtiz +1135 Kane Concourse, Floor 3 +Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025 + +64. A. J. Discala +Canvas Financial, LLC +303 Park Avenue South, Suite 1401 +New York, NY 10001-0646 + +65. Thane Ritchie +Address unknown at this time + +66. [REDACTED] Kretschmar +Address unknown at this time + +67. Michael Legamaro +Address unknown at this time + +68. Debra [REDACTED] +Address unknown at this time + +69. [REDACTED] Levin +Address unknown at this time + +70. Linda Von Allmen +Address unknown at this time + +71. Bruce Zimet, Esq. +Financial Plaza +Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +72. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Farmer Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos Lehrman +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +73. John Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola et al. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +- 74. Jeffrey Epstein do Tonja Haddad, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +- 75. Any and all witnesses listed by J. + +Epstein reserves the right to list and/or call any and all ne ljMT tscovered witnesses upon proper notice. + +Epstein reserves the right to call and/or produce any and a llatit4tesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal. + +Epstein reserves the right to amend and/o4 ent this Witness List upon proper notice to the Parties and this Court. es t + +# EXPRFAIT ..SSES + +Unknown at this time, b pstein will amend upon proper review of all documents and discovery ii er and will properly provide the name and address of same as per the Thal C resbrder. + +WE HEREB RT1FY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all p sted below, via Electronic Service, this August 15, 2016. + +> /s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com + +Electronic Service List + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola et al. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +JSX@SearcyLaw.com; MEP@Searcylaw.com + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA +250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +jgoldberger@agwpa.com + +Marc Nurik, Esq. +1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +marc@nuriklaw.com + +J. J. [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos Lehrman +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. +1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +Tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com +Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. +315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr. +Wcblaw@aol.com; wcbcg@aol.com +W. Chester [REDACTED], Jr., P.A. +250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +• • + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Fn. ltENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOO(MBAG and J. individually. + +Defendants. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'SQ OF • SUPPLEMENTING HIS EXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") h4eb ;files the following amendment/addition to his exhibit list: + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +1. GOVERNMENT'S MOTION t HDW ITS MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE OF SCOTT 114, dated September 26, 2017. Tc1/44T United States of America v. Scott W. Rothste'd 09 - ..., - r0331 COHN. + +4 + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY th la rue and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below, vid% ic Service, this September 28, 2017. + +> 1st Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 , TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7`h Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com Efiling@TonjaHaddad.com + +# Electronic Service List + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JSX@SearcyLaw.com; MEP@Searcylaw.com + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com + +Jaffe WeissinEgsk. Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 staftefile@pathtojustice.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 261/..". Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330K Dee@FredHaddadLaw.co + +Tonja Haddad Colenw,,Esquire Tonja@tonjahaddad.epm; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Law Officestronja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE,7tIstr c'Suite 301 Fort iiiderd6, FL 33301 + +W. Gfiester , Jr. Wcblaw@aol.com wcbcg@aol.com W. Chester Jr., P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +# EXHIBIT M + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +/ + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND + +A Cos + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eloic, y files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter. + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All objectio +- 3. Irreleva C ceps thenticity atcrial +- 4. P value substantially outweighed by daIer of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Di [REDACTED] (5/25/11)
f. [REDACTED] Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney Wild (10/12/17) | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements | | | + +# L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +# 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB + +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Com laint | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Com laint | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoe | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Productio dant | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer§Il ye | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Seco A ed Complaint | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amend mt | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Sti ulation of Dismi reudice | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, d nscripts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes inclu mg, of limited to: | +| | | a. L.M. 9/2 10 | + +# L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +# USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | C. et, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | | al ery and discovery responses | +| 31 | 7/24/0 | o • • Taint and Demand for Jury Trial | +| 32 | 7/2 | tipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice D.E. 21) | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +# E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein + +# 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismiss' | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcript x b d | +| | | Ja v. of rey Epstein | +| | | USDC . ase No. 08-CV-80893 | +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all referenced therein and | +| | | all discovery an disco responses | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant tein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue | +| | | Action for' 4 ertain Based on Parallel Civil and | +| | | Cri n 1 Pro ings with Incorporated | +| | | M ndum of Law (D.E. 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | o e Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | +| | 4/9/09 | '. ' amtiffs Motion to Strike References to Non | +| | 4/17/09 | Plaintiffs First Amended , ip | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to | | | | +| | | Trump, Mark E . stein, Jean Luc | | | +| | | Bruhel, Michael Freidman, Rosalie | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | | | + +# Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated A • + +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80I + +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| | | | | | | + +# Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA) + +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-C IV + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | + +# Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein 17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | + +# In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
  1. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
  2. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
  3. [REDACTED] Adler (10/28/10).
| | | | +| | | | | | | + +# United ," f America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action DC Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 75 | 11/9/09 | V | Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|----|----------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------| +| 76 | 11/23/09 | | d Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| 77 | 11/2 | mended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture | in Rem | + +# The Florida Bar Matters + +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against ██████ J. ██████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +|----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] ; James [REDACTED]; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/1/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +EFTA02765642 + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09 | E-mail from J. to Adler, | +| | 3:36 p.m. | William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | +| 118 | 7/13/09 | E-mail from Michele Dar an (Palm Beach Daily | +| | 2:28 p.m. | News) to J. 08404) | +| 119 | 7/4/09 | E-mail from J. to William J. | +| | 4:37 p.m. | Berger (0220D_ | +| 120 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from EM J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 1:17 p.m. | (04906) | +| 121 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:22 p.m. | (04905 | +| 122 | 7/18/09 | E-mail Lfrom M J. Adler | +| | 4:10 p.m. | (01661) | +| 123 | 7/21/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Leone | +| | 8:21 p.m. | (01352 | +| 124 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele n | +| | 11:22 a.m. | 01479 | +| 125 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradle | +| | 11:35 a.m. | 05803 | +| 126 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Jacquie to J. dwards | +| | 1:29 p.m. | (01662 | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from J. Edw noticing | +| 128 | 7/26/09 | E-mail from Priscila ju ento to Scott | +| | 5:28 p.m. | Rothstein, cc Amy and Adelita Cabello | +| 129 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from B to Susan Spencer | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Wendel (0 3) | +| 130 | 7/28/09 | E-mail fro n Spencer Wendel to J. | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Edw (03 70 | +| 131 | 7/28/09 | E- a m J. to Michele Dargan | +| 132 | 7/28/09 | -m it from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 10:00,a.m._ | 48 | +| 133 | 7/29/014/ | , E-mail from Cam L. to | +| | 1:13 ' | 08420 | +| 134 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:47 ..m. | 11075-11076 | +| 135 | 7/29/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:49 p.m. | (05852-05851)_ | +| 136 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (05535-05530_ | +| 137 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (11320-11322) | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 6:06 .m. | 05538-05539 | +| 139 | 7/31/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 11:20 a.m. | (11080-1108S | +| 140 | 8/10/09 | E-mail from J. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 6:59 .m. | 06965 | +| 141 | 8/10/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 7:23 p.m. | (06967 | +| 142 | 8/11/09 | E-mail Efron7MJ. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 8:43 a.m. | 06968-06969 | +| 143 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 9:29 a.m. | (06963-0696i. | +| 144 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from J. to Michael Isikoff | +| | 10:10 a.m. | 06970-06971 | +| 145 | 8/11/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to J. | +| | 12:34 .m. | 06959-06960 | +| 146 | 8/14/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradle | +| | 4:40 p.m. | (06975 | +| 147 | 8/15/09 | E-mail fromM J. Fisten, cc | +| | 2:41 p.m. | Ken Jenne (02161 | +| 148 | 8/15/09 | E-mail from J. Edw whael Isikoff | +| | 6:00 p.m. | (06972-06973) | +| 149 | 8/17/09 | E-mail from MichaelJ611io o radley J. | +| | 10:32 a.m. | (06976-06977) | +| 150 | 8/17/09 | E-mail from B ey J. art to Jacquie | +| | 10:42 a.m. | (02442) | +| 151 | 8/19/09 | E-mail fro radley J. to Ken Jenne | +| | 2:47 p.m. | (01501) | +| 152 | 8/24/09 | E- m radley J. to | +| | 7:38 p.m. | 0 | +| 153 | 8/25/09 | .1 om to 3. | +| | 11:03 a. | 059 2-0595i. | +| 154 | 8/2 | -mail from J. to | +| | 9:56 p. | (02269 | +| 155 | 8/31/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 10:58 a.m. | 02895 | +| 156 | 9/2/09 | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to J. | +| | | 12:54 p.m. and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie Pat and | +| 157 | 9/7/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 1:39 p.m. | (07612-07613 | +| 158 | 9/7/09 | E-mail from to J. | +| | 6:42 p.m. | (02595-02596) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Beth S. | +| | 2:37 p.m. | Williamson (Wil4 | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:55 p.m. | (01280-01288 | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 1:37 p.m. | (03081 | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:42 .m. | (04320 | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | J. to | 404A" | +| | 6:31 a.m. | (04321 | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 6:53 a.m. | (04318-04319 | | O ' | +| 186 | 9/24/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:45 p.m. | (10586-10589 | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 8:09 a.m. | | cc Renee/Carlos | 029 | +| 188 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | J. to | | +| | 10:06 a.m. | (06789) | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | to | J. | +| | 10:20 a.m. | (06788) | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from Mike Fisten to | n | arnoff | +| 191 | 9/29/09 | E-mail from | | to Ken Jenn and | +| | 10:06 a.m. | Elizabeth Villar (0 | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09 | E-mail from B | ey J. | ards to Nigel Rosser | +| | 10:41 a.m. | (06191 | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09 | E-mail fro | igel Rosser to | J. | +| | 11:08 a.m. | 06189-061 | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09 | E- m | ichael Isikoff to | J. | +| | 4:28 p.m. | (0 9 980 | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09 | 11- il om | | to Mike Fisten | +| | 4:52 p.m. | 02 0-02441 | | | +| 196 | 10449 | -mail from | J. | to Michael Isikoff, | +| | 4:53 pli. | cc Jacquie | (06974 | | +| 197 | 10/2/09 | | E-mail from Michael Isikoke.1. | | +| | 6:14 p.m. | cc Jacquie | 06955-06956) | | +| 198 | 10/8/09 | E-mail from | J. | to Richard | +| | 4:11 .m. | 06961 | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09 | E-mail from Grant J. | | to Scott Rothstein, | +| | 2:17 p.m. | J. | Ken Jenne Kip Hunter and | | +| | | | Adler, cc Grant J. | 2650 | +| 200 | 10/13/09 | E-mail from Mike Fisten to | | J. | +| | 2:27 p.m. | (01727) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] and Jacquie J. [REDACTED] Johnson (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED] Attorneys/id/3/read) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | ██████ Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; ██████ James ██████; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-██████ | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; ██████ James ██████; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-██████ | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | + +# .e s + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's | c, R • en with | +|-----|----------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents pro | o i lied upon or | +| | | referenced by D Be | Jansen in preparing his | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Wi | Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in | +| | | Virginia Gt | . Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Sup | enta Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard | +| | | J. | in v. Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 287 | Misc. | | | +| | | it t io | | +| | | o r r. Bernard J. Jansen | | + +# Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog — Rothstein | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. ChiefJudge: | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all mat | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victi al | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, d | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared documents | +| 327 | | All foundation exhili | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and i exhibits | +| 329 | | Demonstrative a an ibits including, but not | +| | | limited to, charts, nes, diagrams, models, | +| | | surveys, p phs and blow-ups | +| 330 | | All newly IP - red documents/exhibits | +| | | An d all ibits listed by J. | +| | | wa ng is right to object to any of | + +PlaintifVC unter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Fr Primary: Scott®lin ock9tw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been finished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +(SS E Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +# SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT N + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# VIA HAND DELIVERY + +Jack Scarola + +Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 158i Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Dear Jack: + +December 19, 2017 + +Pursuant to the Court's Order on Mr. Edwards' Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses, I am enclosing our firm's check in the amount of \$400 payable to Searcy, Denny. + +In addition, with regard to our exhibits, ram enclosing a flash drive of those documents identified on our November 16, 2017, Amended Exhibit List. In light of the Court's recent rulings, we anticipate amending our Exhibit List after we have had an opportunity to review Mr. Epstein's former counsels' files. + +Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. + +Si + +Scott + +SJUtic + +Enclosure + +# EXHIBIT O + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_124_Picture_0.jpeg) + +# VIA HAND DELIVERY + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 isxfasearcvlaw.com + +> RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 411e J. Edwards . . 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50- 009.dA040800XXXXMBAG + +Dear Jack: + +February 2, 2018 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL (561) 727-3600 I FAX (561) 727-3601 + +oes + +I am enclosing a flash drive coutainin additional documents for our trial Exhibit Nos. 18, 35, 48, 323, and 324. We are still obtaining additional public records and will provide those to you upon our receipt. + +ricS" + +Enclosure SJL/tIc + +• + +Scott J. Link + +From: To: lark °tarok; David P. Wale 3z • lyadeleoliccom• otajilawalataayagra Cc 'Mary McCann"- tgraberlv MAKI).Kra Berard Rnrkenharn• scgtuajok; flirts R. Ibvierert sawn Bcc: Subject: Epstein v. Date: Friday, February 16, 2018 1:55:00 PM Attachments: 323 A-10 Supo.pdf 321,945\_5uppodf 323 A-26 Sup)Odf 323\_8:31\_5uPOOdf 323 A-34 Suno.pdf 323\_&35\_5upp.pdf 323 6-36 SuCOOdf 3233-31\_5u011,COf 323 323\_CAl\_Supp,pdf C-35 Sup0.Pdf + +sistir + +I am attaching supplemental public record Trial Exhibits for Ex. 323. + +Thank you. + +Tina CP/FRP Certified Paralegal + +LINK 8 ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 1 Email: + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential in immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitiv unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us ns because email deliveries may be delayed or ons may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be From: rata To: ;ark Scarola; David P. Vitale 1. atafiteppellatelait=0; Dradeeortc corn Cc: lark finldher0er Stott 1. / Kaalitiadlicsientath; MAN Ma00; Kimberly Marsh Bcc: Subject: Epstein v. - Trial Exhibits Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 7:13:00 PM + +I am attaching additional trial exhibits from our general categories at the following link: + +We will be supplying our Clerk's Exhibit List shortly. + +Thank you + +Tina CP/FRP Certified Paralegal + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-36011 Email: tna@Jin + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. I 14/ iii meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive comm " ns use email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our commu lions not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +# **EXHIBIT P** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +From: To: ace: Subject: Epstein v. - Fre-marking Exhibits Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 5:36:00 FM + +Hi Chris, + +We are in the process of pre-marking our exhibits in accordance with the Court's pre-marking guidelines. We wanted to let you know that we are marking our exhibits with "Plaintiff" stickers. In addition, we will be sending an updated and specific list identifying the items individually s required by the guidelines. We ask that your office do the same. O4 + +Thank you. + +Tina Certified Paralegal CP/FRP + +LINK 8 ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: Gcc + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential i immediately. Please confirm receipt of time se unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. imposed by the Internal Revenue Servicu.s on.. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us munications because email deliveries may be delayed or cations may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be + +6 S 17ilit + +# EXHIBIT Q + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND CLERK'S TRIAL Y EPSTEIN'S 1ST + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting T Lists, (2) the parties' December 22, 2 not waive their right to amend th exhibits which require each e uant to (1) paragraph G of the Court's ng the parties to agree to amend their Exhibit retrial Stipulation which provided the parties did Lists, and (3) the Clerk's guidelines on pre-marking identified individually, hereby files this Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to set forth i \*vidual y those items previously contained in general categories. + +Cos + +# INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +- O. No ObjecCSS +- 1. All o +- 2. All ob tions, except authenticity +- 3. Irrelevant or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10-1 | N/D | Index of Appendix Items to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10A | 1/9/13 | Fourth Amended Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10B | 7/31/12 | Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to [REDACTED] Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10C | 3/23/10 | Transcript of Deposition of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10D | 12/12/11 | Excerpts of Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein - In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 09-34791 | | | | +| 10F | 12/1/09 | Information - United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 10G | N/D | Court Docket - L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | | | | +| 10H | N/D | Court Docket - E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 101-1 | 6/19/09 | Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 101-2 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 101-3 | 7/23/09 | Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 101-4 | 10/16/09 | Jane Doe's Notice That Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly and Motion for Consideration by the Court of Materials in Docket Numbers 282 and 283 in Determining Motion for Appointment of a Receiver Restraining Fraudulent Assets Transfers and Incorporated Memorandum of Law – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 101-5 | N/D | Court Docket – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10J | 3/17/10 | Transcript of Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10K | 11/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10L-1 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | | | | +| 10L-2 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal – A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | | | | +| 10L-3 | 1/13/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Lawyers from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10L-4 | 7/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Latest Rothstein Updates – 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by The Florida Bar | | | | +| 10M-1 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 10M-2 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-1 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Video Deposition of Leslie Wexler and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-2 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Glenn [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-3 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-4 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-5 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-6 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Mark Ep [REDACTED] and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-7 | 8/11/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-8 | 8/10/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10N-9 | 8/24/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-10 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-11 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-12 | 10/16/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-13 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-14 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael Sanka – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10O | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10P | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement – United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331-CR-COHN | | | | +| 10Q | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 10R | N/D | Brad Edwards Privilege Log of Emails Dated November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 10S | Misc. | Documents Produced Responsive to Order (individual items identified separately below) | | | | +| 10T | 7/24/09 | Complaint – L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092-Cohn-Seltzer | | | | +| 10U | 11/5/09 | Order - Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/[REDACTED] | | | | +| 10V | 7/29/09 | Email from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 10W | 12/12/11 | Excerpt of Transcript of Deposition of Scott Rothstein – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10X | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|----------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 11A-1 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcript of | J. | +| 11A-2 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Transcript of | J. with | +| | | 15ih | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | +| 11A-3 | 10/10/13 | Deposition Transcript of | J. (Ex. 1 | +| | | a at, 15th | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | +| 11A-3a | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3b | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Le | +| 11A-3c | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann Ma aAna | +| 11A-3d | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann | +| 11A-3e | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | Villa | +| 11A-3f | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villa L.M. | +| 11A-3g | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | t | +| 11A-3h | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | Eisenberg | +| 11A-3i | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. S t | o e Doe | +| 11A-3j | 7/9/08 | Letter from A | an lafana to Brad | +| IIA-3k | 7/9/08 | Letter from A. | ' Villafana to Brad | +| 11A-31 | 3/20/11 | Letter f | R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | +| 11A-3m | 12/10/10 | r fro | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| | | t o A. Ferrer | | +| 11A-3n | 3/22/11 | i tte from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3o | | tter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3p | 3/15/ 1 | | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Caccell | +| 11A-3q | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3r | 9/29/11 | | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | +| 11A-3s | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3t | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3u | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 11A-4 | 11/10/17 | Deposition Transcript of ██████ J. ██████ - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11B-1 | 3/17/10 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11B-2 | 1/25/12 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibit identified below) | | | | +| 11C | 6/14/12 | Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11D | 4/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of ██████ S. Adler - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11E | 5/25/11 | Deposition Transcript of Abraxas ██████ Discala with exhibits - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11F | 2/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Dean ██████ Kretschmar - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11G | 3/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Michael Legamaro - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11H | 10/12/17 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (exhibits listed as follows) | | | | +| 11H-1 | 8/7/07
8/14/07 | FBI Report – E.W. | | | | +| 11I | 12/1/17 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11J | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger - - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 12A | 12/4/10 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12B | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12C | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production | | | | +| 12D | 6/21/10 | Epstein's Request for Admissions to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12E | 7/7/10 | [REDACTED] Response to First Request for Admissions | | | | +| 12F | 4/7/11 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12G | 5/5/11 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce dated April 7, 2011 | | | | +| 12H | 5/16/11 | Epstein's Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12I | 6/10/11 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12J | 12/9/11 | Epstein's Second Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12K | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's Third Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12L | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Response to Request for Production | | | | +| 12M | 2/21/13 | [REDACTED] Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011 | | | | +| 12N | 7/25/13 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated June 25, 2013 | | | | +| 12O | 8/11/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12P | 9/5/17 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12Q | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Interrogatories | | | | +| 12R | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production | | | | +| 12S | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12T | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12U | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's Expert Interrogatories | | | | +| 12V | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce re Experts | | | | +| 12W | N/D | [REDACTED] Privilege Log – Emails November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 13-1 | 4/9/09
3:50 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (02645) | | | | +| 13-2 | 4/22/09
9:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03037) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-3 | 4/24/09
11:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ Adler to Steven Jaffe, █, William Berger, Barry █, Scott Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Carl Linder and Robert Buschel (03036) | | | | +| 13-4 | 4/26/09
7:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Radler to █ (00149) | | | | +| 13-5 | 4/27/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Marc Nurik (01527) | | | | +| 13-6 | 4/28/09
6:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Katherine Ezell (4493-4495) | | | | +| 13-7 | 5/1/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Rob to █ (00014) | | | | +| 13-8 | 5/13/09
1:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (03988-04000) | | | | +| 13-9 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (02231) | | | | +| 13-10 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to Bradley █ and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 13-11 | 5/28/09
5:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to █ (00090) | | | | +| 13-12 | 5/29/09
5:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Eric Glasser to Bradley █ (2906-2908) | | | | +| 13-13 | 6/3/09
11:47 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to █ (00133) | | | | +| 13-14 | 6/3/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Wayne Black (11237) | | | | +| 13-15 | 6/3/09
6:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Wayne Black to █ (08006) | | | | +| 13-16 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | +| 13-17 | 7/13/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to █ (00026) | | | | +| 13-18 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 13-19 | 7/14/09
2:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01004) | | | | +| 13-20 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 13-21 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to █ (02684-02685) | | | | +| 13-22 | 7/20/09
1:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ to William Berger (01475) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-23 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05087) | | | | +| 13-24 | 8/2/09
1:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (03694) | | | | +| 13-25 | 8/3/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Beth to Carl Linder (12289) | | | | +| 13-26 | 8/3/09
7:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (01166) | | | | +| 13-27 | 8/6/09
2:21 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01258) | | | | +| 13-28 | 8/10/09
5:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (15113-15114) | | | | +| 13-29 | 8/10/09
5:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (00158) | | | | +| 13-30 | 8/11/09
9:26 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26481) | | | | +| 13-31 | 8/12/09
9:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein (26394) | | | | +| 13-32 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 13-33 | 8/13/09
9:51 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscilla Nascimento to Scott Rothstein (25922) | | | | +| 13-34 | 8/13/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26480) | | | | +| 13-35 | 8/13/09
5:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to Scott Rothstein (26356) | | | | +| 13-36 | 8/13/09
6:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein (26570) | | | | +| 13-37 | 8/21/09
4:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (00992) | | | | +| 13-38 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED]
Edwards, Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113) | | | | +| 13-39 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05112) | | | | +| 13-40 | 8/24/09
10:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01423) | | | | +| 13-41 | 8/25/09
8:58 a.m. | E-mail chain – from William Berger to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05071) | | | | +| 13-42 | 8/26/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (01406) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-43 | 9/4/09
11:18 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ to Paul Cassell and William Berger (02043) | | | | +| 13-44 | 9/4/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ to Spencer Kuvin (03731-03732) | | | | +| 13-45 | 9/10/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ to redrum (06406-06408) | | | | +| 13-46 | 9/11/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ to Mike Fisten (01686) | | | | +| 13-47 | 9/17/09
8:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ to █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-48 | 9/17/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ J. █ █ █ █ █ to William Berger (02088) | | | | +| 13-49 | 9/19/09
7:54 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ █ █ to █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-50 | 9/19/09
10:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-51 | 9/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-52 | 9/30/09
3:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff (25925) | | | | +| 13-53 | 9/30/09
3:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff (25874) | | | | +| 13-54 | 10/1/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie Johnson to █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-55 | 10/1/09
1:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-56 | 10/5/09
7:16 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-57 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 13-58 | 10/13/09
4:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26094-26096) | | | | +| 13-59 | 10/13/09
5:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26826-26827) | | | | +| 13-60 | 10/14/09
7:36 a.m. | E-mail chain - from █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-61 | 10/14/09
9:13 a.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27284) | | | | +| 13-62 | 10/15/09
6:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | +| 13-63 | 10/15/09
8:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, D. Von Allmen (26882) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-64 | 10/16/09
11:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Wheeler to Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (01255) | | | | +| 13-65 | 10/16/09
3:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Preve and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26836-26837) | | | | +| 13-66 | 10/17/09
1:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (04398-04402) | | | | +| 13-67 | 10/17/09
1:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassel (04408-04412) | | | | +| 13-68 | 10/17/09
4:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26807) | | | | +| 13-69 | 10/17/09
4:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26808-26809) | | | | +| 13-70 | 10/18/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (27379) | | | | +| 13-71 | 10/19/09
10:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27293) | | | | +| 13-72 | 10/19/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26021 with attachment) | | | | +| 13-73 | 10/19/09
4:32 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Preve, D. Von Allmen and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27270) | | | | +| 13-74 | 10/20/09
8:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27355) | | | | +| 13-75 | 10/20/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27325) | | | | +| 13-76 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 13-77 | 10/20/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to Chris Podaras (27322) | | | | +| 13-78 | 10/20/09
5:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Podaras to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Frank Prieve (26777-26781) | | | | +| 13-79 | 10/20/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Podaras, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Prieve (26782-26786) | | | | +| 13-80 | 10/21/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Podaras (26088-26089) | | | | +| 13-81 | 10/21/09
2:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (25998) | | | | +| 13-82 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-83 | 10/22/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain – from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27072) | | | | +| 13-84 | 10/22/09
1:48 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996) | | | | +| 13-85 | 10/22/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Podaras to Thane Ritchie, Scott Rothstein, A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (Legamaro Depo. Ex. 6) | | | | +| 13-86 | 10/23/09
11:37 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to Mark Fistos, [REDACTED] Adler, [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Scott Rothstein and Steven Jaffee (26747) | | | | +| 13-87 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 13-88 | 10/23/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (08042-08044) | | | | +| 13-89 | 10/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Scott Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26741-26742) | | | | +| 13-90 | 10/23/09
12:16 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Edwards to Matthew Weissing (08059-08061) | | | | +| 13-91 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 13-92 | 10/23/09
12:18 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott J. Rothstein to A.J. Discala and Dean Kretschmar (27522) | | | | +| 13-93 | 10/23/09
12:27 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Bradley [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26756-26758) | | | | +| 13-94 | 10/23/09
12:36 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Mark Fistos (08036-08038) | | | | +| 13-95 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-[REDACTED] chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 13-96 | 10/23/09
1:05 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Michael Legamaro (Legamaro production) | | | | +| 13-97 | 10/23/09
1:26 p.m. | E-mail chain – [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Scott Rothstein and Mark Fistos (26762) | | | | +| 13-98 | 10/23/09
1:31 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Mark Fistos and Steven Jaffe (01117) | | | | +| 13-99 | 10/23/09
1:54 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Kretschmar to Scott Rothstein (27051-27052) | | | | +| 13-100 | 10/23/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08121-08123) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-101 | 10/23/09
2:02 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED], Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26749-26752) | | | | +| 13-102 | 10/23/09
2:05 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08128-08130) | | | | +| 13-103 | 10/23/09
2:06 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] and Mark Fistos (08118-08120) | | | | +| 13-104 | 10/23/09
2:09 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Adler (08131-08133) | | | | +| 13-105 | 10/23/09
2:09 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Steven Jaffe to [REDACTED], Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] Adler (08124-08126) | | | | +| 13-106 | 10/23/09
2:10 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to [REDACTED], Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] Adler (08135-08138) | | | | +| 13-107 | 10/23/09
2:24 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to Steve Jaffe, Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Adler, Bradley Edwards and Matthew Weissing (27494) | | | | +| 13-108 | 10/23/09
2:45 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to Steven Jaffe, Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Adler, Bradley [REDACTED] and Matthew Weissing (26760) | | | | +| 13-109 | 10/23/09
3:02 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Michael Legamaro (27025) | | | | +| 13-110 | 10/23/09
3:43 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Russell Adler to Scott Rothstein (25997) | | | | +| 13-111 | 10/25/09
3:21 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (25937) | | | | +| 13-112 | 10/27/09
2:59 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Preve to A.J. Discala (26973) | | | | +| 13-113 | 10/27/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Phaedra Xanthos (26604-26605) | | | | +| 13-114 | 10/28/09
9:22 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Lea Kaplan (26737) | | | | +| 13-115 | 10/28/09
9:34 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Ken Jenne to Mike Fisten and Pat [REDACTED] (26485) | | | | +| 13-116 | 10/29/09
7:44 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Paul Cassell to [REDACTED] (07019-07021) | | | | +| 13-117 | 10/30/09
10:04 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to Debra [REDACTED] (27013) | | | | +| 13-118 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 13-119 | 3/18/10
1:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Tom Hartog and Donnie | | | | +| 13-120 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-121 | 3/24/10
2:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog | | | | +| 13-122 | 4/1/10
3:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. ██████ to Story Cowles | | | | +| 13-123 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. | | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements provided in the matter | | | | +| 17A | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, interview of Jane Doe | | | | +| 17B | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, interview of E.W. | | | | +| 17C | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, interview of Jane Doe | | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 18-1 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein] | | | | +| 18-2 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and Davit Hart Rogers | | | | +| 18-3 | 8/12/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – Greens Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-4 | 8/14/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – ██████ Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-5 | 8/20/09 | Ep ██████ Objections to Notices of Production From Non-Parties and Incorporated Motion for Protective Order | | | | +| 18-6 | 1/23/09 | L.M.'s Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-7 | 8/4/09 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-8 | 8/29/09 | Notice of Serving Plaintiff's Supplemental Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatory Number 19 | | | | +| 18-9 | 3/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's Third Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-10 | 4/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers to Defendant's Fourth Interrogatories | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 18-11 | 4/15/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers to Defendant's Fifth Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-12 | 6/25/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Update Answers to #2 #4 and #5 of Defendant's Fourth Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-13 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'s Myspace page | | | | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to: | | | | +| 29A-1 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Testimony of L.M. | | | | +| 29A-2 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Testimony of L.M. | | | | + +# L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein Ir 0 . P C S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | doe! • t [all court filings referenced therein | +|----|---------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 31 | 7/24/09 | m aint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. I) | +| 32 | 7/20 | S pulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | +| 33 | | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +# E. W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | +|------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 35-1 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 35-2 | Misc. | Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum to | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended at | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Lan | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complai | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Pre' di e | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation an is ing Case | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, depositio ts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes including, t t 1* ited to: | +| 47A | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transc • o ir . | + +# Jar oe v. Jeffrey Epstein US .D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | Court d t [all court filings referenced therein | +|------|---------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | | and all di and discove res onses | +| 48-1 | 4/9/09 | P mtiff's otion to Strike References to Non | +| | | ro ution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to | +| 48-2 | /2 | Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Finn Affiliation | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 58A | 9/30/09 | Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 74A-1 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 74A-2 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 74A-3 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 74B | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| 74C | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against [REDACTED] J. Edwards, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James Edwards ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to: | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 87A-I | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-2 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-3 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-4 | 12/14/11 12114/I 1 | Deposition Transcript Tran of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-5 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-6 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| | | Afternoon Session OP" | +| 87A-7 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-8 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothste' | +| 87A-9 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. It | +| 87A-10 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott 1 , — P.M. | +| 87A-11 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of S . othstein — | +| 87A-I2 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transc ' o W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-13 | 12/21/11 | Deposition T nscri Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-14 | 12/21/11 | Depositi Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| | | Afternoo ion | +| 87A-15 | 12/22/11 | sitio Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 87A-16 | 12/22/1 | o Won Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | + +# Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler — Communication + +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | +|----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01620) | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01446) | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to Grace [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and Bradley J. Edwards (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] Martinez (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 119 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05803) | | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06968-0696) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------| +| 154 | 8/26/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 9:56 p.m. | 02269 | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 10:58 a.m. | 02895 | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09 | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to | | J. | +| | 12:54 p.m. | and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. AS | +| | 1:39 p.m. | 07612-07613 | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 6:42 p.m. | 02595-02596 | | | +| | | | | O 'S | +| 159 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 6:49 p.m. | 07614-07615 | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to Bra | | +| | 7:00 p.m. | (07605-076 | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. Edward | | | +| | 8:12 p.m. | (07607-07608) | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from Conchita S | | dley J. | +| | 10:55 p.m. | (07609-07611) | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from Bradle | s to | | +| | 11:43 a.m. | 04015 | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from C c taS | off to | J. | +| | 11:50 a.m. | 07646 | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - Y J. | to | | +| | 11:53 a.m. | Conchita Sa ff(0 ) | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - onchita | to | J. | +| | 12:04 ..m. | Edwar. 7676 7677 | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09 | E-mail c m | to | J. | +| | 1:59 p.m. | ds 674-07675 | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09 | • chain - from J. | to | | +| | 2:04 | c ita 07678-07679 | | | +| 169 | 9/8/ | E ail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 2- | wards (07684-07685 | | | +| 170 | 9/ | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 2:42 p. . | 07682-07683 | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 2:49 p.m. | 07695-07697 | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 3:25 p.m. | 07680-07681 | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 7:51 p.m. | 07686-07688 | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | 3. | +| | 7:53 •.m. | (07689-07691) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
[REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Renee/Carlos [REDACTED] (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Conchita Sarnoff (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita
Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie Johnson (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie Johnson (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in Edwards adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to Bradley J. Edwards (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for Bradley J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 242 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ with referenced articles | | | | +| 245A | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| 245B | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| 245C | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| 245D | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| 245E | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245F | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245G | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| 245H | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| 245I | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| 245J | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 245K | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana | +| 245L | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of | +| 245M | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower | +| 245N | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| 245O | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| 245P | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| 245Q | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| 245R | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Rut ul orce | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Chan t Palm | +| 245S | 10/20/13 | calm Beach Daily Ne ewe Lawsuit Against | +| | | Epstein Expected to tim Testimony | +| 245T | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Excl iv • al Assault Victim | +| | | Alleges Abuse Youth Pastor | +| 245U | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. leva Fall Nets Woman \$13 | +| 245V | July 2012 | Dail B ' Revi w. Top Florida Verdicts & | +| | | Set emen o 2011 | +| 245W | 6/13/12 | Bus ess Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush | +| | | ri ub of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | +| 245X | 4/22/ 1 | m Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey | +| 246 | 8/10 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with | +| 246A | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected | +| 246B | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on | +| 246C | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire | +| | | Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 246D | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 246E | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| 246F | 4/23/14 | [REDACTED], Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| 246G | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion - Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Experts | | | | | | +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | + +| No. 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 | Date Misc. 9/9/16 11/30/16 Misc. 11/1/09 11/2/09 11/2/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/5/09 | Description Objection Marked Marked for Id. In Evidence his 10/20/17 Report Bernard J. Jansen in v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) 4OAA All public recur Ci Other Articles Rothstein yy Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme i ge: " and is Going into Receivership The New York Times: Fr c ations Against Florida Lawyer Set 0 ace t Return His Donations Rothstein Retur r ntemplating Suicide, Partner Says Florida Law : ks to be Dissolved Seemed od to be True F N r ' ig Funds Probe 11/6/09 dkk. w MU | +|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 297 | 1 | othstein Accomplice Still on Lam | +| 298 | 11 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et at | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article b Paul Brinkman | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder Levin's Ugly Past | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | Levin was Rothstein's Whale | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in To20~ | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein P | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Lo Former | +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former of t Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Bus al. A Year After | +| | | Rothstein. Man do s Unanswered | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida B . Sc othstein Scandal: One | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. tern Expose Details Sex. Murder, and | +| | | Corrupti ind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | F* e Year on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | al each Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| | | J. and any witnesses listed by | +| 323A-1 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| 323A-2 | Misc. | E.W.'s mugshot arrest information | +| 323A-3 | 3/17/11 | E.W.'s marriage license | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-4 | Misc. | Brent Moody's mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-5 | Misc. | Gregory [REDACTED] mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-6 | Misc. | Property Records for 4140 N.W. 7 th Lane, Delray Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323A-7 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Moody, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-8 | N/D | Florida Corporations Division's Records for C. Moody Enterprises, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-9 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Courtney Elizabeth, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-10a | Misc. | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832; Court Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-10b | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Information | | | | +| 323A-10c | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Case File Sheet | | | | +| 323A-10d | 2/19/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Notice of Appearance, Waiver of Arraignment, Plea of Not Guilty, Demand for Discovery and Demand for Trial | | | | +| 323A-10e | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Judgment and Sentencing | | | | +| 323A-10f | 1/10/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Complaint/Arrest Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-11 | 1/14/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for Eva [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323A-12 | 1/16/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-13 | 1/16/18 | 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-14a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-14b | 8/4/96 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Order Approving Settlement of Minor's Tort Claim | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-15a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-15b | 11/12/02 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Citations | | | | +| 323A-15c | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-15d | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-15e | 1/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15f | 4/7/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Amended Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15g | 5/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-15h | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order for Restitution | | | | +| 323A-15i | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-15j | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Fines, Costs and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323A-15k | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Sheriff Information Sheet | | | | +| 323A-15l | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Cost of Supervision Fee | | | | +| 323A-16a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-16b | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-16c | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report - Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-16d | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report | | | | +| 323A-16e | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List of Criminal Activity | | | | +| 323A-16f | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Order | | | | +| 323A-16g | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-16h | 1/4/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - No File for Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-17a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-17b | 7/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - No File for Possession of Scheduled IV Substance | | | | +| 323A-18a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-18b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear - Possession of a Controlled Substance | | | | +| 323A-18c | 6/15/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 07-603178 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-18d | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-18e | 7/9/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Information | | | | +| 323A-18f | 7/11/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity Report | | | | +| 323A-18g | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-18h | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323A-18i | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement | | | | +| 323A-18j | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323A-18k | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323A-18l | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-18m | 5/25/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges | | | | +| 323A-19a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB – Docket and Court Filings | | | | +| 323A-19b | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Boynton Beach Police Department - Battery | | | | +| 323A-19c | 10/18/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Information - Battery | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-19d | 10/29/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity | | | | +| 323A-20a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-20b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-21a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-21b | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-22a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-22b | 8/8/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-23a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-23b | 5/30/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-23c | 6/23/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement and Judgment | | | | +| 323A-24a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-24b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – North Palm Beach Public Safety Report No. 70-09009903 | | | | +| 323A-24c | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Notice of Arraignment | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-25a | | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Docket | | | | +| 323A-25b | 9/17/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-25c | 10/30/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Final Judgment for Possession | | | | +| 323A-26a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-26b | 10/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – First Appearance Disposition Record – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-26c | 10/9/09 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-27a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-27b | 6/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-28a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-28b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-29a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-29b | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Report No. 78-10001780 and Probable Cause Affidavit – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-29c | 9/16/10 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB Judgment, Sentence and Plea | | | | +| 323A-30a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | 4/4/10 State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 30b | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 31a | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906- | +| 323A- | 7/17/11 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | +| 323A- | 8/19/11 State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm 4OAA | +| 31c | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm 0 | +| 32a | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-227746- | +| 323A- | 9/15/10 State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial C • , | +| 32b | Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-2 4 | +| 323A-33 | State of Florida v. E. W, 15th Judi ' ' , Palm | +| | Beach County Case No. 50-20 27 47- | +| | AXXX-MB — Docket and C. a ents | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W, 1 i ici 1 Circuit, Palm | +| 34a | Beach County Case N' to 201 -CT-014746- | +| | AXXX-SB — Dock n. II Documents | +| 323A- | 5/20/11 Arrest / Notice t , Palm Beach County | +| 34b | Sheriff's Offi Repo o. 06-11-076192 | +| 323A- | 5/20/11 Citation | +| 323A- | 8/19/11 State of v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 34d | B h Co ty Case No. 50-201I-CT-014746- | +| 323A- | to f Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 35a | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-36b | 5/10/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report No. 82-2012-10813 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-36c | 8/6/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-36d | 8/6/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-37a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-37b | 5/13/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report No. 40-12-006170 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-37c | 7/14/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-38 | | Eva J. [REDACTED] v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2013-DR-004661-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-39 | | Eva J. [REDACTED] v. Brent James Moody , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2013-DR-004658-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-40 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 62010TR074209A88830 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-41 | | Pinellas County Court docket search results – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-42a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 – Docket | | | | +| 323A-42b | 6/21/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-43a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943-WASP – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-43b | 6/21/13 | Citation | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-44 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943WPW – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-45 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46b | 8/20/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Sheriff's Office Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-46c | 7/19/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-46d | 6/23/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | +| 323A-46e | 6/22/13 | Complaint/Arrest Affidavit PP13-36627 | | | | +| 323A-46f | 5/30/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Judgment of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-46g | 9/17/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Affidavit Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-46h | 9/15/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Probation Specialist Report on Violation | | | | +| 323A-46i | 8/12/15 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Plea/Disposition on Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-47a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA021127XXXXNO – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-47b | 12/25/13 | Complaint / Arrest Affidavit Report No. 2013-77625 | | | | +| 323A-48a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA-128504 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-48b | 10/24/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-48c | 12/24/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-
49a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
49b | 1/17/14 | Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-
50a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
50b | 5/6/16 | Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-51 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02416-OC-CF – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-52 | | Hillsborough County search result – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-
53a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-012614 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
53b | 10/19/14 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear 14-16018 | | | | +| 323A-
53c | 6/18/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-012614 - Judgment and Sentence | | | | +| 323A-54 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-015507000AHC – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
55a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
55b | 10/19/14 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear 14-16018 | | | | +| 323A-
55c | 9/19/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 - Judgment and Sentence | | | | +| 323A-
56a | | Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-
56b | 11/20/14 | Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC - Writ of Possession | | | | +| 323A-
57a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015TR009235000 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|---------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | 1/11/16 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 58a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | Judgment, Clerk's Certificate, Order of Revocation | +| 58b | | of Probation and Sentence | +| 323A- | 2/25/16 | State of Florida v. E. FV, 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| | 4/4/16 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | Report No. ACt'jlIC 16-190881 | +| 323A- | 11/20/15 | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59c | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-161 | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E. W., 13th Judicial C' ' | +| 60a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015 | +| 323A- | 1/11/15 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E. FE, 1 ' 1 \$ ici I Circuit Court, | +| 61a | | Hillsborough County No. I 16-CF | +| | | 004732000AHC — Court Documents | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | State of Florida Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 61b | | Hillsborough un e No. 2016-CF | +| | | 004732000A — ea, Sentencing, Judgment | +| 323A- | | State of orida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 62a | | Hillsborolk, - .unty Case No. 2016-CF | +| | | 0 3300; • HC — Docket and Court Documents | +| 323A- | 4/4/16 | 'nal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear — 16- | +| 62b | | 33 | +| 323A-63 | 7/2 | m Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-64 | 7/2 | 7 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-65 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-66 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-67 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-68 | 9/18/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-69 | 9/7/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-604687 | | | | +| 323A-70 | | Eva Jeanne v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-DR-009334-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-71 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Incident Report #2040097 | | | | +| 323A-72a | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-067231 | | | | +| 323A-72b | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 03-067249 | | | | +| 323A-72c | | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-72d | 5/20/03 | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323A-73a | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-091886 | | | | +| 323A-73b | | State of Florida v. Eva Ford , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2003-CF-008412-AXXX-MB – Docket an Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-74 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-096606 | | | | +| 323A-75 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-19767 | | | | +| 323A-76 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 | | | | +| 323A-77 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-21604 | | | | +| 323A-78 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 | | | | +| 323A-78a | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Information Sheet Case No. 0420500 | | | | +| 323A-78b | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report Agency Report No. 62-01-1-20500 | | | | +| 323A-79 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-084433 | | | | +| 323A-80 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-049448 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-81 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-06073437 | | | | +| 323A-82 | 6/9/07 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report #7028375 | | | | +| 323A-83 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 | | | | +| 323A-84a | | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-84b | 11/12/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-84c | 11/27/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Final Judgment for Eviction | | | | +| 323A-85 | | The David Associates I v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-011051-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-86a | 6/6/90 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 90-509-CA-01 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323A-86b | 3/13/08 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 95-7369 – Motion | | | | +| 323A-87 | | State of Florida v. Wesley William [REDACTED], Jr., 5 th Judicial Circuit, Hernando County, Case No. 90001037CFMA – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-88 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search | | | | +| 323A-88a | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed between Homes By West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 323A-88-b | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed between E.W. and Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 323A-89a | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-89b | 2/24/15 | Closing Documents – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-90 | 5/30/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-91 | 5/20/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 11-076192 with Supplements 1 & 2 | | | | +| 323B-1 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Earth Bubbles LLC and Corporate Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 323B-2 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Loxayoga LLC | +| 323B-3 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323B-4 | 10/14/17 | Palm Beach County Sherriffs Office Offense | +| 323B-5 | License Details -L.M. | | +| 323B-6 | License Details — L.M. | | +| 323B-7 | Twitter Account — L.M. | | +| 323B-8 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Wayne Seaman | +| | | 4141. , k. | +| 323B-9 | | Booking / Arrest Information — John Reidel `Sr | +| 323B-10 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Justin Sprague | +| 323B-11 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Lexine Turney | +| 323B-12a | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th | Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | 1/8/08 Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th | Judicial Ci | +| 323B-12c | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th Ju 'a it, Lee | +| | County Case No. 08-DR-0 | 1 - form Child | +| | Custody Jurisdiction and | fo ent Act | +| | 1/30/08 Justin Sprague v. L. | Ju cial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case No. 0 | R 41 - Respondent's | +| | Motion to Tra | n | +| 323B-12e | 2/26/08 Justin Spragu v. L. | 0th Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case | DR-003141 — Order on | +| | Motion | ransfer Venue — 50-2008-DR 003645 | +| 323B-I3 | Sharon R | Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach | +| | • Fr ty S | h Results — L.M. | +| | L | . to of DOR OBO v. Justin L. Sprague, 15th | +| | 1c . | I Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- | +| 323B-I6 | 1 | .M. v. Justin L. Sprague, 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| 323B-17 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-18 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-19 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-033050 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-20 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-045627 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-21 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-003304 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-22 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-004824 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-23 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097995 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-24 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097991 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-25 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-261718 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-26 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-27 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067444 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-28 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067445 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-29 | | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2008-DR-003645 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-30 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-195830 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-31 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338340 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-32 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338339 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 323B-33 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15"1 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-34 | State of Florida v. L.M., 151° | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-35 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-36a | State of Florida v. L.M., 15t6 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | 9/29/10 State of Florida v. L.M. 1516 | Circuit Court, Palm | +| 323B-36c | 10/11/10 Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probabl | | +| 323B-37 | State of Florida v. LM, 15'h | Judi ' rc , Palm | +| | Beach County Case No. 50-2 | 3416 — | +| 323B-38 | State of Florida v. L.M., | J ' ial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach County Case N | -TR-173415 — | +| | Docket and Court | o | +| 323B-39 | State of Florid | ., t6 Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach Coun | ase 50-2011-TR-173563 — | +| | Docket and Co | cuments | +| 323B-40 | State of Wa, v. L.M., 15i6 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | B ch | Case No. 50-2011-TR-175658 — | +| 323B-41a | to Florida v. L.M., 156 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-42 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-43a | State of Florida v. L.M., 1516 | Judicial Circuit, Palm | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-43b | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 13-00742 | | | | +| 323B-44 | | Justin Lee Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2013-DR-001053 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-45 | | Maynor & Associates LLC FKA Maynor Sachs & Copple LLC v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-SC-010273 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-46 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. Wayne A. Seaman , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-DR-011327 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-47 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140544 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-48 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140545 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49a | | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49b | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323B-50 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-TR-007216 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-51 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045479 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-52 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045493 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-53 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-DR-012051 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-54 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , Broward County Clerk of Court Case No. 08102448TI20A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-55 | 8/6/95 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Christine [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-56 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Anna C. Terry | | | | +| 323B-57 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Robbie N. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323B-58 | 7/4/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-59a | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage with Dependent or Minor Child(ren) | | | | +| 323B-59b | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) Affidavit | | | | +| 323B-59c | 10/26/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Order to Effect Service of Process on Respondent or Judgment of Dismissal Without Prejudice | | | | +| 323B-60 | 5/23/01 | Christine C. [REDACTED] v. Scott A. Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Petition for Regular Dissolution of Marriage (with children) | | | | +| 323B-60a | 12/1/14 | Christine C. Miller v. Scott A. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323B-61 | | Anna Terry v. Scott [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2004 DR 001691 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62a | 7/6/04 | In re LM , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62b | 7/6/04 | In re L.M. , Petition for Involuntary Treatment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323B-62c | 7/15/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Information / Description Sheet | | | | +| 323B-62d | 7/20/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Order of Dismissal and Closing Mental Health File | | | | +| 323B62-e | 7/14/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Letter from Scott [REDACTED] to Commissioner Hanson | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323-B63 | 5/19/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98-079452 | | | | +| 323B-64 | 1/1/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99015315 | | | | +| 323B-65 | 3/28/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99052321 | | | | +| 323B-66 | 4/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99065180 | | | | +| 323B-67 | 4/29/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-68 | 1/1/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-69 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-70 | 8/23/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-71 | 1/9/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-72 | 2/8/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-73 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-74 | 4/29/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-75 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-76 | 7/12/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-77 | 11/23/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-78 | 3/10/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-79 | 3/11/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-80 | 4/2/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-81 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-82 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-83 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-84 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-85 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-86 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-87 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-88 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-89 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-90 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-91 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-92 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-93 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-94 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-95 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-96 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 323B-97 | 9/12/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-121047 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-98 | 3/10/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-047084 | | | | +| 323B-99 | 6/2/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-081178 | | | | +| 323B-100 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 323B-101 | 3/31/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-056185 | | | | +| 323B-102 | 6/2/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-080955 | | | | +| 323B-103 | 8/19/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-110038 | | | | +| 323B-104 | 11/15/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-143988 | | | | +| 323B-105 | 12/1/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-149652 | | | | +| 323B-106 | 12/4/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-150902 | | | | +| 323B-107 | 3/4/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-047135 | | | | +| 323B-108 | 12/31/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-169751 | | | | +| 323B-109 | 8/7/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-106910 | | | | +| 323B-110 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 323B-111 | 1/4/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-022380 | | | | +| 323B-112 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 323B-113 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 323B-114 | 12/4/16 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 16-160017 | | | | +| 323C-1 | | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property Records | | | | +| 323C-2 | | Mugshot/Booking Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-3 | | Mugshot/Booking Information - Jamie Capalbo | | | | +| 323C-4 | 11/8/10 | Mugshot/Booking Information – Batu Tonaroglu | | | | +| 323C-5 | 6/26/00 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offence Report Case No. 00094263 | | | | +| 323C-6 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-7 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-8 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-9 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-10 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-11 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-12 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-13 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-14 | 9/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-15 | 12/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-16 | 1/6/04 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report – Case No. 04-000491 | | | | +| 323C-17 | 10/7/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04120214 | | | | +| 323C-18 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04140335 | | | | +| 323C-19 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-20 | 5/11/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 6065267 | | | | +| 323C-21 | 2/6/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-22 | 6/2/09 | State of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Driver Licenses Transcript Record – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-23 | | Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Criminal History Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-24 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , Broward County Circuit Court Case No. 11020221CF10A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-25 | | Palm Beach County Clerk of Court Search Results – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-26 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2002-IN-024424-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-27 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-IN-005174 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28b | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 05035619 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-28c | 5/23/05 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-28d | 5/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 Final Judgment for Fines, Costs, and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323C-29a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-29b | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2006065038 | | | | +| 323C-29c | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report and Probable Cause Affidavit - Report No. 06-15-0364 | | | | +| 323C-29d | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 06150364 | | | | +| 323C-29e | 12/27/06 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-29f | 1/25/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Capias | | | | +| 323C-29g | 10/6/12 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Clerk of Circuit Court – Case Bond Depositor Request Form and Assignment Form | | | | +| 323C-29h | 12/21/11 | Florida Driver License – Douglas Evan Schlien | | | | +| 323C-29i | 5/2/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No. 2007024243 | | | | +| 323C-29j | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323C-29k | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323C-29l | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-29m | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-008444-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Docs. | | | | +| 323C-30b | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07067112 | | | | +| 323C-30c | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2007023554 | | | | +| 323C-30d | 4/30/07 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-30e | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report - Report No. 06-07-067112 | | | | +| 323C-30f | 9/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Notice of Appearance by William Berger | | | | +| 323C-30g | 5/18/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 - Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30h | 6/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-31a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-31b | 10/28/09 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Notice of Appearance by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler – Jonathan Birkman | | | | +| 323C-32a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-009222 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-32b | 3/23/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citation #4202-RSK 5 | | | | +| 323C-33a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-33b | 9/12/10 | Delray Beach Police Department - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report No. FLO 500400 | | | | +| 323C-33c | 9/12/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citations | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-33d | 10/7/10 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-33e | 2/7/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-34a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 - Docket and Court Docs | | | | +| 323C-34b | 9/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-34c | 2/9/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-35a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-0158219 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-35b | 9/12/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010045488 | | | | +| 323C-35c | 11/15/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010056669 | | | | +| 323C-36a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-36b | 11/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-37a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864 –Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-37b | 12/8/10 | Traffic Citation | | | | +| 323C-38a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-021516 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-38b | 12/9/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-39a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037753 – Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-39a | 12/11/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-40a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037705 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-40b | 12/15/10 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office – Arrest/Notice to Appear Report | | | | +| 323C-40c | 12/15/10 | Citations | | | | +| 323C-41a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-039080 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-41b | 12/15/10 | Citations | | | | +| 323C-41c | 1/14/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-42a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-312095-AXXX-NB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-42b | 12/15/10 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-43a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-001899-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-43b | 12/15/10 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-44a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-44b | 1/28/11 | Citation | | | | +| 323C-44c | 5/29/12 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703-AXXX-MB – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-45a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-45b | 2/1/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report No. 06-11-033106 | | | | +| 323C-45c | 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-45d | 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Order of No Contact | | | | +| 323C-45e | 3/14/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – No File | | | | +| 323C-46a | | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-46b | 2/16/11 | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, Dismissal of Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323C-47a | | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-47b | 2/22/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, | | | | +| 323C-47c | 3/2/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323C-48 | | Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49a | | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49b | 11/1/16 | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Petition for Temporary Custody, Order for Relative Custody | | | | +| 323C-50 | 3/20/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8441655 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-51 | 5/10/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8460082 | | | | +| 323C-52 | 4/30/88 | Affidavit of Probable Cause – Possession of Cocaine; [REDACTED] Dial | | | | +| 323C-53 | 5/13/88 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Case No. 88-5449-CF - Information for Possession of Cocaine | | | | +| 323C-54 | 1/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 9114746 | | | | +| 323C-55a | 4/3/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Fugitive Warrant, Waiver of Extradition, Order and Fugitive Release | | | | +| 323C-55b | 4/1/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 9169712 | | | | +| 323C-56a | 4/25/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-49190F – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-56b | 3/23/91 | West Palm Beach Police Department, Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 94-91-20938 | | | | +| 323C-57 | 7/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 91123360 | | | | +| 323C-58 | 7/13/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 91132390 | | | | +| 323C-59 | 8/15/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offense Report Case No. 91148337 | | | | +| 323C-60a | 6/5/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Allen Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9388CF – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-60b | 7/9/91 | Probable Cause Affidavits, Report No. 91-127098 | | | | +| 323C-61a | 8/26/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9862-CF – Information for burglary and grand theft | | | | +| 323C-61b | 8/15/91 | Greenacres City Dept. of Public Safety Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 4-21-1918682 | | | | +| 323C-62a | 4/16/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage; Petition for Child Custody and Other Relief | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-62b | 12/8/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED] , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 - Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323C-63 | 11/23/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98161878 | | | | +| 323C-64a | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial Arrest Affidavit – First Degree Murder / Aggravated Child Abuse | | | | +| 323C-64b | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-65a | 5/18/99 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Information; possession of counterfeit bills | | | | +| 323C-65b | 1/21/99 | Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety - Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-65c | 10/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Sentence and Judgment | | | | +| 323C-65d | 11/7/01 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial v. State of Florida , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D00-4167 - Opinion | | | | +| 323C-66 | 3/10/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-044660 | | | | +| 323C-67 | 8/22/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-112705 | | | | +| 323C-68 | 9/3/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-117506 | | | | +| 323C-69 | 9/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-17025 | | | | +| 323C-70 | 10/13/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-133427 | | | | +| 323C-71a | 7/24/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF – Information for Third Degree Grand Theft | | | | +| 323C-71b | 7/7/00 | Arrest Affidavit Report No. 1430000 and Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-71c | 6/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF - Complaint Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-72 | 1/19/02 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form and Arrest Affidavit – [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial – aggravated manslaughter | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-73 | 2/13/04 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-875-CFB – Judgment; Aggravated manslaughter of a child | | | | +| 323C-74 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-75 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No., 00-875-CFA – Interview of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-76 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-375 – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-77 | 2/17/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06034056 | | | | +| 323C-78 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06073497 | | | | +| 323C-79 | 10/4/06 | Greenacres Department of Public Safety Offense Report No. 06-15661 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-80 | 10/5/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06119682 | | | | +| 323C-81 | 10/8/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 061210144 | | | | +| 323C-82a | 6/26/06 | In re [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB – Petition for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82b | 7/14/06 | Comprehensive Alcoholism Rehabilitation Programs, Inc. Chemical Dependency Assessment Form | | | | +| 323C-82c | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Order for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82d | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Report on Hearing | | | | +| 323C-83a | 8/2/07 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 07CF009101AMB – Information for fraudulent use of a credit card | | | | +| 323C-83b | 6/24/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83c | 8/26/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83d | 6/24/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323D-1 | 11/4/97 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323D-2 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 98-027604 – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-3 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-4 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-5 | N/D | In re Daniel [REDACTED] III, 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2000-GA-000718 - Docket | | | | +| 323D-6 | 6/10/01 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-7 | 8/3/01 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-8 | 3/2/02 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Department of Public Safety – 02-14029 – [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-9 | Misc. | State of Florida v. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-MMM-011621 - Docket and Case information - Petit Theft | | | | +| 323D-10 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-075321 – Virginia [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323D-11 | | State of Florida v. Virginia Roberts , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-TR-155872 - Docket | | | | +| 323D-12 | 6/19/02 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – Virginia Roberts | | | | +| 323D-13 | | State of Florida v. Virginia [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-TR-212355 - Docket | | | | +| 323E-1 | 4/8/16 | Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement | | | | +| 323E-2 | 1/6/15 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Complaint | | | | +| 323E-3 | 2/10/15 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-4 | 8/12/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's First Amended Counterclaim | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323E-5 | 4/8/16 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-6 | 12/4/15 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability | | | | +| 323E-7 | 11/23/15 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records | | | | +| 323E-8 | 12/11/15 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Exhibit 6 to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-9 | 12/16/15 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Virginia [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-10 | 1/8/16 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-11 | 1/12/16 | Counter-Claim Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Dershowitz's First Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-12 | 1/26/16 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Alan Dershowitz's Opposition to [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-13 | 2/1/16 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim and for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages Against Plaintiffs | | | | +| 323F-1 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – About Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323F-2 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 323F-3 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| 323F-4 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Doe v. U.S. | | | | +| 323F-5 | | Pottinger Website Printout – In the News | | | | +| 323F-6 | | Pottinger Website Printout – Sexual Harassment and Abuse on Wall Street | | | | +| 323F-7 | | News Article – Boynton Woman wins \$71 million in lawsuit about rape on yacht | | | | +| 323F-8 | 1/29/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Verdict | | | | +| 323F-9 | 1/30/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323F-10 | 2/22/16 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-11 | 7/1/15 | Michael Demella v. The Las Olas Holding Company , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-12 | 11/15/17 | The Las Olas Holding Company v. Michael Demella , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D16-231 - Mandate and 7/19/17 Opinion | | | | +| 323F-13 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Amended Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-14 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law | | | | +| 323F-15 | 11/18/16 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Judgment | | | | +| 323F-16 | 8/5/15 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-17 | 12/6/11 | Conner v. Clyde Enterprises, Inc. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 10-002726 – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-18 | 10/21/14 | Michael Barnes v. Prince’s Beach Bar , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 13-022624 – Verdict Form | | | | +| 323G-1 | | Property Records for 1109 N.E. 2 Street, Hallandale Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323G-2 | | Property Records for 10141 S.W. 40 th Street, Davie Florida | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323G-3 | | Property Records for 2385 N.W. 34 Way, Coconut Creek, Florida | | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | | | | +| 324-1 | 7/11/08 | Victim's Reply to Government's Response to Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (D.E. 9) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-2 | 7/15/08 | Government's Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act (D.E. 13) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-3 | 7/15/08 | Declaration of ██████ Villafana in Support of United States' Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement (D.E. 14) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-4 | 7/11/08 | Transcript of hearing (D.E. 15) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-5 | 7/29/08 | Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing (D.E. 17) (( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-6 | 8/1/08 | Victim's Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Protection of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-7 | 9/25/08 | Victim's Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (D.E. 28) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-8 | 12/22/08 | Supplemental Declaration of ██████ Villafana (D.E. 35) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-9 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-10 | 9/13/10 | Petitioners' Notice in Response to Administrative Order Closing Case (D.E. 39) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-11 | 10/27/10 | Petitioners' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution (D.E. 41) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-12 | 10/28/10 | Order (D.E. 44) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-13 | 12/17/10 | Status Report (D.E. 45) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-14 | 9/2/11 | Motion for Limited Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 93) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-15 | 9/26/11 | Order (D.E. 99) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-16 | 10/14/11 | Epstein's Omnibus Reply in Support of his Motion for Limited Intervention (D.E. 108) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-17 | 12/5/11 | Petitioners' Protective Motion for Remedies (D.E. 128) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-18 | 3/29/12 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 159) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-19 | 4/17/12 | Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 for Production, Use and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations (D.E. 162) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-20 | 4/18/12 | Notice of Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (D.E. 163) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-21 | 6/18/13 | Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Proffer Government Correspondence in Support of CVRA Claims & Granting Motion to Unseal Correspondence and Related Unredacted Pleadings of Petitioners (D.E. 188) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-22 | 6/27/13 | Notice of Appeal of Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 195) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-23 | 7/8/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Protective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 207) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-24 | 7/12/13 | Petitioners' Response to Epstein's Motion for Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 209) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-25 | 7/26/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 215) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-26 | 8/8/13 | Petitioners' Response to Third Motion for "Limited" Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 221) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-27 | 8/9/13 | Epstein's Reply to Petitioners' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 222) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-28 | 2/13/14 | Order Granting Jeffrey Epstein's Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 246) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-29 | 6/11/14 | Letter from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11 th Circuit with Judgment (D.E. 254) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-30 | 9/22/14 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 256) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-31 | 1/5/15 | Declaration of Alan Dershowitz (D.E. 282-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-32 | 1/14/15 | Order Requesting Justification for Intervenor Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order (D.E. 286) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-33 | 4/15/15 | Order Denying Intervenor's Motion for a Protective Order (D.E. 326) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-34 | 2/10/16 | Petitioners' Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment With Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 361) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-35 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of E.W. (D.E. 361-26) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-36 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of L.M. (D.E. 324-36) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-37 | N/D | Court Docket ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-38 | 9/21/06 | Letter from James Eisenberg to A. [REDACTED] Villafana (D.E. 403-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of [REDACTED] exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac B 903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680 Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(Minkrocklaw.com + +(S'Sir e Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant law ffrey Epstein + +s + +Gs' + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98070ae53f798246e3e8c6baf04136bb9817eb0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538/EFTA02765538.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,8959 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765538.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 204, + "chars": 570198, + "elapsed_seconds": 84.96, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_44_Picture_19.jpeg", + "_page_45_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_46_Picture_209.jpeg", + "_page_49_Picture_0.jpeg", + "_page_50_Picture_17.jpeg", + "_page_80_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_124_Picture_0.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF FIN'S RESPONSE \nTO MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEINtT ELY SUPPLEMENTAL \nEXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS A ANY REFERENCE TO \nDOCUMENTS CONTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIALS LISTED ON OEM \nPRIVILEGE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 312.5356140136719 + ], + [ + 528.2754516601562, + 312.5356140136719 + ], + [ + 528.2754516601562, + 384.1393737792969 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 384.1393737792969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ISSUES TO BE DECIDED BY THE COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 501.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 424.8597412109375, + 501.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 424.8597412109375, + 519.8893737792969 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 519.8893737792969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN I ROMIG I !ON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 71.905029296875 + ], + [ + 356.1566162109375, + 71.905029296875 + ], + [ + 356.1566162109375, + 85.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 85.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Privilege Log Confusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 234.2454071044922, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 234.2454071044922, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "14. Rex ims of Documents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 221.87557983398438, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 221.87557983398438, + 468.363037109375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 468.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Factual Inconsistencies", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 282.6588134765625, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 282.6588134765625, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Documents Were Tu er to Razorback's Counsel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 394.9097595214844, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 394.9097595214844, + 474.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 474.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibit K)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 136.55230712890625, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 136.55230712890625, + 155.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 155.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibit F.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 134.18930053710938, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 134.18930053710938, + 306.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 306.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "K. l'iminu of Id en tifvine Exhibits", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 267.3873596191406, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 267.3873596191406, + 334.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 371.1640625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 371.1640625, + 610.9925079345703 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 610.9925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler E-mails", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 318.33062744140625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 318.33062744140625, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Exhibits Relating to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.332275390625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.332275390625, + 86.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Alan Dershowitz", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 196.968994140625, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 196.968994140625, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Website and Verdicts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 274.5270690917969, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 274.5270690917969, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Property Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 255.34671020507812, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 255.34671020507812, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. CVRA Documents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 445.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 445.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONTINUA OF THE LAWSUIT IS AN ISSUE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 446.9085388183594, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 446.9085388183594, + 610.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 610.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HISTORY OF DISCLOSURE OF TRIAL EXHIBITS4S.,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 476.58184814453125, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 476.58184814453125, + 238.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 238.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. \nJuly \n20, 2017, \nOrder \nSpecially \nSetting \nJury \nTrial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 360.2794189453125, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 360.2794189453125, + 265.863037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 265.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. s Exhibit Lists", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 227.56494140625, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 227.56494140625, + 583.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 583.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Exhibit Lists", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 230.2488250732422, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 230.2488250732422, + 417.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 417.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Decembe . Pre-Trial Stipulation", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 321.34735107421875, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 321.34735107421875, + 528.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 528.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach did not steal the disc!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 444.48565673828125, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 444.48565673828125, + 114.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 114.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 416.6021728515625 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 416.6021728515625 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 478.23779296875 + ], + [ + 237.47000122070312, + 478.23779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.684, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 367.5511169433594, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 367.5511169433594, + 147.2052001953125 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 147.2052001953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCE S:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 400.087890625, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 400.087890625, + 63.33416748046875 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 63.33416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 474.29999999999995, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 474.29999999999995, + 396.90000000000003 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 396.90000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.224, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 527.544, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 307.224, + 123.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 443.08799999999997, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 443.08799999999997, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 336.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 154.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.04999923706055, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 402.5741882324219 + ], + [ + 47.04999923706055, + 402.5741882324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 377.604, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 422.4343566894531, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 422.4343566894531, + 85.0946044921875 + ], + [ + 377.604, + 85.0946044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 438.7843322753906, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 438.7843322753906, + 197.214599609375 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 197.214599609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 469.6004333496094, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 469.6004333496094, + 406.0945739746094 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 406.0945739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSC T CIR DONALD W. HAFELE JUDGE + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED], J. [REDACTED], +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order Granting/Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial +Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth +in Rule 1.440 +Page 2 + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. Edwards

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED],
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED], J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765742/EFTA02765742.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765742/EFTA02765742.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce33b862ae732413a48c76b076d0cb1b2b7564dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765742/EFTA02765742.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765742.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 5993, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTIN 'LAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S MO O REMOVE CASE FROM TRIAL DOCKET \nIN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATE SET \nFORTH IN RULE 1.440", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 519.1319580078125, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 519.1319580078125, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 183.87 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765742" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d40c895663140a628958175c9d23d8cdeb10f065 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifPCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +0 + +C ) + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANTS FFR \ )Y EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATT RN EY OF RECORD & DIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPD ATTORNEY INFORMATION + +Plaintift7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey. `Epstein"), pursuant to Administrative Order 2.311-2/13, hereby provides no e the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, PA is still the law firm representing E ey Angela M. Many should be removed as counsel of record and replaced with At chel Jenny Glasser. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 8, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denn 2139 Palm B West Pal mepast v.com jsxasearcv/aw.com scarolateamasearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or J. Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard L 33409 + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, 0 West Palm Beach, Florida 3340 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3 + +By: / R hel + +Scott J. Link (FBN ) + +Kara Berard R (FBN 44903) + +Rachel J. GI N 577251) + +Primary: krocklaw.com + +Prim m + +P linIcrocklaw.com + +Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +dary: EserviceOlinkrocklaw.com + +Actose Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 nis@FLAvnellateLaw.com kbt(4FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2aa496d9cdf78d3b22ffba8760efaa9171d015bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744/EFTA02765744.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765744.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3714, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANTS FFR \\ )Y EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATT RN EY OF RECORD & \nDIRECTIONS TO CLERK TO UPD ATTORNEY INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 326.5787658691406 + ], + [ + 495.0336608886719, + 326.5787658691406 + ], + [ + 495.0336608886719, + 370.38043212890625 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 370.38043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765744" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cad1b12c627c187afcee1aa3181448e2eaef69c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ORE TENUS MOTION TO STAY TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Cou katring on March 8, 2018, upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstei \re nus motion to stay this case pending disposition by the Fourth District Co ukkji, peal of an Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and Emergency Petition for Writ of Certiorari to be filed by Epstein today, as to the Court's Order dated March 8, 2018, Denying Epstein's Motion to Remove Case From Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440, and as to the Court's oral ruling granting Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Motion for Separate Trials. + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Ore Tenus Motio' o Stay is DENIED. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beac ach County, Florida this day of March, 2018. + +> BLE DONALD W. HAFELE T JUDGE + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA04080 MPG Order Granting/Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440 Page 2 + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f340ebc9774889e90ba955111fd8da230c1cafbb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747/EFTA02765747.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765747.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 5281, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S ORE TENUS MOTION TO STAY TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.0999984741211, + 317.9615478515625 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 317.9615478515625 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 89.0999984741211, + 345.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 190.35 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765747" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b18cbf42aa7b0d315c9a3c6251c08ccbf80a870 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg) + +## Fourth District Court of Appeal 110 South Tamarind Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 242-2000 + +## ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE + +DATE: March 09, 2018 + +STYLE: JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +4DCA#: 18-0762 + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and J. + +"(<7 1 . + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal has received the Petit c \V Mandamus reflecting a filing date of March 8, 2018. + +The county of origin is Palm Beach. + +The lower tribunal case number provided is 5802009CA040800)OO3AB AG. + +The filing fee is not required. + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal's case number must be utilized on all pleadings and correspondence filed in this cause. Moreover, ALL PLEADINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ATTORNEY'S FLORIDA BAR NUMBER and a physical address. + +ELECTRONIC FCGi S a MANDATORY FOR ALL ATTORNEYS. Please visit edca.4d o to register for eDCA, the court's electronic filing system. c + +ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE NOT REGISTERED FOR eDCA WILL NOT RECEIVE FURTHER PAPER DOCUMENTS FROM THE COURT + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach John Scarola Marc S. Nurik Scott J. Link Jack Alan Goldberger Nichole J. Segal Rachel Glasser J. Clerk Palm Beach \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..610a490d0fb14572ca0cad1dabf990ff6ee5fd13 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/EFTA02765749.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1136, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.91, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal \n110 South Tamarind Avenue \nWest Palm Beach, Florida 33401 \n(561) 242-2000", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 396.0712890625, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 396.0712890625, + 203.339111328125 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 203.339111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.212, + 212.60552978515625 + ], + [ + 424.5557861328125, + 212.60552978515625 + ], + [ + 424.5557861328125, + 230.62738037109375 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 230.62738037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765749" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df4846ddb4a3154fc1fe092f1143614241753121 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765749/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9ed8cf30c3e1ec7c2d2f7b369daf59cb76f92de6cac168e8d2316e6401fc9aec +size 12122 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..850f03077f0083bbbc78c1119cadda21bad7ddaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 09, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. 11.11- W. R T I individually and J. , individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +Appellee / Respondent(s) ," + +ORDERED that the petitioner's March 8, 2018, request for emergency treatment is granted; further, ORDERED that the petitioner's Marcheltiohotion for review is granted. Proceedings in the circuit court are stayed pendinNfurther order of this Court; further, ORDERED that the respondent is directed tollettesponse to the petition, within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The petitioner may file a reply within five (5) days of service of the response. + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach C John Scarola Marc S. Nurik Rachel Glasser ' rw J. c!ote, alicc Alan Mier Nichole J. Segal Scott J. Link Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Clerk Palm Beach + +Served: + +dl + +LONN WEISSBLUMI Cigt\* Fourth District Court otAfl + +![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edff2c7ed6dd50340a5e073d76b31a230abfbd2f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/EFTA02765750.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1084, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38000000000001, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 538.0657348632812, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 538.0657348632812, + 102.31201171875 + ], + [ + 70.38000000000001, + 102.31201171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.26, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 223.37999999999997, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 223.37999999999997, + 288.3120422363281 + ], + [ + 64.26, + 288.3120422363281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765750" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1906d3b4f5b76fa9184f2399260d24ab12a8cf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765750/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d7fdcc0c50ee7a646a2380e5adb62116b5dd1830fc02b68e680603b49bdee9df +size 20618 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fab4355abd651e9409c5e0e692f7b8e1a4e5a2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.md @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants, + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SEARCHED SERIALIZED +FILED +2010 SEP 22 PM 3:11 +CIRCUIT CIVIL / PALMBEACH + +**STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS** + +Defendant ██████████ J. ██████████, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse party relies."). + +*Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein* + +1. 1. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children. Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010, at 110 (hereinafter "Epstein Depo.") (Deposition Attachment #1).1 +2. 2. Epstein repeatedly sexually assaulted more than forty (40) young girls on numerous + +1 When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission. Accordingly, ██████████ is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him. "[I]t is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." *Baxter v. Palmigiano*, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); *accord Vasquez v. State*, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege – at least not in a civil setting." *Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp.*, 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). + +occasions between 2002 and 2005 in his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida. These sexual assaults included vaginal penetration. Epstein abused many of the girls dozens if not hundreds of times. Epstein Depo. at 109 ("Q: How many times have you engaged in oral sex with females under the age of 18?" A: [Invocation of the Fifth Amendment]); Deposition of Jane Doe, September 24, 2009 and continued March 11, 2010, at 527 (minor girl sexually abused at least 17 times by Epstein) (hereinafter "Jane Doe Depo") (Deposition Attachment #2); id. 564-67 (vaginal penetration by Epstein with his finger), 568 (vaginal penetration by Epstein with a massager); Deposition ., ., September 24, 2009, at 73 (hereinafter "L.M. Depo") (Deposition Attachment #3) (describing -the manner in which Epstein abused her beginning when LM was 13 years old, touching her vagina with his fingers and vibrator) at 74, line 12-13 (she was personally molested by Epstein more than 50 times), at 164, line 19-23 and 141, line 12-13 and 605, line 3-6 (describing that in addition to being personally molested by Epstein she was paid \$200 per underage girl seventy (70) underage girls - she told hi insisted that she continue to bring hi "E.W. Depo") (Deposition Attachinent #4 ght Epstein and she brought him more than id not want to bring him any more girls and he e girls); Deposition of E.W., May 6, 2010 (hereinafter at 115-116, 131 and 255 (describing Epstein's abuse of her beginning at age 14 when he paid her for touching her vagina, inserting his fingers and using a vibrator and he also paid her \$200 for' each other underage female E.W. brought him to molest. She brought him between 20(nd 30 underage females); Deposition of Jane Doe #4, date (hereinafter "Jane Doe #4 \\, Depo") (Deposition Attachment #5) at 32-34, and 136 (she describes first being taken to Epstein at 15 years old, "Being fingered by him, having him use a vibrator on [me], grabbing my nipples, smelling my butt, jerking off in front of me, licking my clit, several times."). + +3. At all relevant times has had a good faith basis to conclude and did conclude that Epstein was able to access a large number of underage girls through a pyramid abuse scheme in which he paid underage victims \$200-\$300 cash for each other underage victim that she brought to him. See Palm Beach Police Incident Report at 87 (hereinafter "Incident Report") (Exhibit "A").3 The Palm Beach Police Incident Report details Epstein's scheme for molesting underage females. Among other things, the Incident Report outlines some of the experiences of other Epstein victual. When S.G, a 14 year old minor at the time, was brought to Epstein's home, she was taken upstairs by a woman she believed to be Epstein's assistant. The woman started to fix up the/thorn, putting covers on the massage table and bringing lotions out. The "assistant" then left the room and told S.G. that Epstein would be up in a second. Epstein walked over to S.G. and, told her to take her clothes off in a stem voice. S.G. states in the report she did not know what to do, as she was the only one there. S.G. took off her shirt, leaving her bra on. Epstein, then in a towel told her to take off everything. S.G. removed \ '7 her pants leaving on her thong panties. Eps;eiathen Instructed S.G to give him a massage. As S.G gave "\\ Epstein a massage, Epstein turned around and masturbated. S.G. was so disgusted, she did not say anything; Epstein told her she "hail a really hot body." Id. at 14. In the report, S.G. admitted seeing Jeffrey Epstein's penis and stated she thought Epstein was on steroids because he was a "really built / 7 guy and his wee weer as very tiny." Id at 15. + +4. The eiact number of minor girls who Epstein assaulted is known only to Epstein. However, had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe that Epstein's victims were substantially more than forty (40) in number. In addition to the deposition excerpts from two of his many victims above about the number of underage girls brought to Epstein and the Palm Beach + +2 In support of all assertions concerning the actions took, what learned in the course of his representation of his clients, good faith beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that Affidavit. + +For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as attachments HI, #2, #3, etc., while exhibits attached to this memorandum will be identified alphabetically as exhibits A, B, C, etc. + +incident report, there is overwhelming proof that the number of underage girls molested by Epstein through his scheme was in the hundreds. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, (hereinafter Jane Doe 102 complaint) (Exhibit "B"); see also Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, April 14, 2010, at 442, 443, and 444 (Epstein invoking the 5th on questions about his daily abuse and molestation of children) (Deposition Attachment #6). + +5. At all relevant times has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe that Epstein and his attorneys knew of the seriousness of the criminal investigation against him and corresponded constantly with the United States Attorney's Office i an attempt to avoid the filing of numerous federal felony offenses, which effort was success Se orrespondence from U.S. Attorney's Office to Epstein (hereinafter "U.S. Attorney's Cofrespo ence") (Composite Exhibit "C) (provided in discovery during the Jane Doe v. Epstein case). + +6. At all relevant times has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe that, more specifically, Epstein's attorneys knew of Epstein's scheme to recruit minors for sex and also knew that these minors had avilactions that they could bring against him. In fact, there was much communication between Epstein's attorneys and the United States Prosecutors in a joint attempt to minimize Epstein's civil exposure. For example, on October 3, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafaita sent an email (attached hereto as Exhibit "D") to Jay Lefkowitz, counsel for Epstein, with attached proposed letter to special Epstein. The letter reads in pertinent part, regarding handling numerous expected civil claims against + +"The undersigned, as counsel for the United States of America and Jeffrey Epstein,. write to you to provide information relevant to your service as a Special in the selection of an attorney to represent several young women who may have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly referred to as the "United States") have conducted an investigation of Jeffrey Epstein regarding his solicitation of minor females in Palm Beach County to engage in prostitution. Mr. Epstein, through his assistants, would recruit underage females to travel to his home in Palm Beach to + +engage in lewd conduct in exchange for money. Based upon the investigation, the United States has identified forty (40) young women who can be characterized as victims pursuant to 18 USC 2255. Some of those women went to Mr. Epstein's home only once, some went there as much as 100 times or more. Some of the women's conduct was limited to performing a topless or nude massage while Mr. Epstein masturbated himself. For other women, the conduct escalated to full sexual intercourse. As part of the resolution of the case, Epstein has agreed that he would not contest jurisdiction in the Southern District of Florida for any victim who chose to sue him for damages pursuant to 18 USC 2255. Mr. Epstein agreed to provide an attorney for victims who elected to proceed exclusively pursuant to that section, end agreed to waive any challenge to liability under that section up to an amount agreed to by thei kies. The parties have agreed to submit the selection of an attorney to a Special + +7. At all relevant times has had a good faith b takbelieve and did in fact believe that L.M. was, in fact, a victim of Epstein's criminal abusey i atrt.M. was one of the minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recogniz tim. L.M.'s sworn deposition testimony and the adverse inference drawn from Epste' s N , to testify confirm that Epstein began sexually assaulting L.M. when she was 13 y ontinued to molest her on more than fifty (50) occasions over three (3) years. Epstein,R: epo., ttachment #1, at 17 ("Q: Did you ... ever engage e\ y\_\_ in any sexual conduct with L.M.?" A: finyt>ation of the Fifth Amendment].); see also Epstein Depo., 2 April 14, 2010, Attachment #6, at 456 ("Q LM was an underage female that you first abused when she was 13 years old; is that correct?" A: (Invocation of Fifth Amendment].) + +8. Epsteinwas also given ample opportunity to explain why he engaged in sexual activity with L.M. beginhing when L.M. was 13 years old and why he has molested minors on an everyday basis for years, dud he invoked his 5th amendment right rather than provide explanation. See Epstein Deposition, February 17, 2010, at 11-12, 30-31 (Deposition Attachment # 7). + +9. Epstein also sexually assaulted E.W., beginning when she was 14 years old and did so on numerous occasions. See E.W. Depo., Attachment #4 at 215-216. + +10. Mother of the minor girls Epstein sexually assaulted was Jane Doe; the abuse began + +when Jane Doe was 14 years old. Rather than incriminate himself, Epstein invoked the 5th amendment to questions about him digitally penetrating Doe's vagina, using vibrators on her vagina and masturbating and ejaculating in her presence. Epstein Depo., April 14, 2010, Attachment #6, at 420, 464, 468. + +11. When clients L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe were 13 or 14 years old, each was brought to Epstein's home multiple times by another underage victim. Epstein engaged one or more of the following acts with each of the then-minor girls at his mansion:,--receiving a topless or completely nude massage; using a vibrator on her vagina; masturbating in her presence; ejaculating in her presence; touching her breast or buttocks or vagina or the clothes covering her sexual organs; and demanding that she bring him other underage girls. Epstein and, his co-conspirators used the telephone to contact these girls to entice or induce them into going to his mansion for sexual abuse. Epstein also made E.W. perform oral sex on him and was to perform sex acts on (Epstein's livein sex slave) in Epstein's presence. See Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice Regarding Evidence of Similar Acts of Sexual Assault, filed in Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Ea. 2010), as DE 197, (hereinafter "Rule 413 Notice") (Exhibit "E"); Jane Doe Depo., Attachment #2, at 379-380; L.M. Depo., Attachment #3, at 416;-, W. Depo, Attachment #4, at 205. + +12. At al t evant imes has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe that ye snot er of the minor girls Epstein sexually assaulted was C.L. When she was approximately >3.4ears old, C.L. was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epstein; Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein ejaculated in her presence; Epstein also demanded that she bring him other underage girls. See Rule 413 Notice, Exhibit "E"; Incident Report, Exhibit "A." + +13. At all relevant times has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe that yet another girl Epstein sexually assault was A.H. When she was approximately 16 years old, she was brought to Epstein's home by another underage victim. While a minor, she was at Epstein's home on multiple occasions. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with her while she was a minor at his house - topless or completely nude massage on Epsteik-Epstein used a vibrator on her vagina; Epstein masturbated in her presence; Epstein eja in her presence; Epstein touched her breast or buttock or vagina or the clothes covering rgans; was made to perform sex acts on Epstein; made to perform sex acts on in Epstein's presence. Epstein also forcibly raped this underage victim, as he held h ea ignin against her will and pumped his penis inside her while she was screaming "No". See. Rule 413 Notice, Exhibit "E"; Incident Report, Exhibit "A", at 41 (specifically discussing the rape): + +"[A.H.] remembered that she climaxed and was removing herself from the massage table. [Alf.] asked for a sheet of a r and drew the massage table in the bathroom and where Epstein, and she were. Epstein turned [A.H.] on to her stomach on the massage bed and inserted his penis into her vagina. [A.H.) stated Epstein began to pump his penis in her vagina. [A.H.] became upset over this. She said her head was being held against the bed forcibly, as he continued to pump inside her. She screamed no, and Epstein stopped ...." + +"[A.H.] advised there were times that she was so sore when she left Epstein's house. [A.H.) advised she was ripped, torn, in her vagina area. [A.H.) advised she had difficulty'walking to the car after leaving the house because she was so sore." + +14. --Without detailing each fact known about Epstein's abuse of the many underage girls, has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe at all relevant times that Epstein also abused other victims in ways closely similar to those described in the preceding paragraphs. Epstein's additional victims include the following (among many other) young girls: S.G.; A.D.; V.A.; N.R.; J.S.; V.Z.; J.A.; F.E.; M.L.; M.D.; D.D.; and D.N. These girls were between the ages of 13 and 17 when Epstein abused them. See Rule 413 Notice, Exhibit E; Deposition of E.W., Deposition Attachment #4. + +15. One of Mr. Epstein's household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein's mansion for purported "massages." See Rodriguez Depo. at 242- 44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodriguez was aware that "sex toys" and vibrators were found in Epstein's bedroom after the purported massages. Id. at 223-28. Rodriguez thought Epstein was doing was wrong, given the extreme youth of the girls he saw. Id. at 230-31.c ) + +16. Alfredo Rodriguez took a journal from Epstein's complite t / fleeted many of the names of underage females Epstein abused across the country and the world, including locations such as Michigan, California, West Palm Beach, New York, NeS S ) and Paris, France. See Journal (hereinafter "The Journal" or "Holy Grail") (Exhibit " (identifying, among other Epstein Y acquaintances, females that Rodriguez believes7. crimes — including E.W. and L. ntitled to basic rights during any plea bargaining process, including the right to be treated with fairness, the right to confer with prosecutors regarding any plea, and the right to be heard regarding any plea. The process that was followed leading to the nonprosecution of Epstein violated these rights of E.W. and L.M. See Emergency Petn. for Victim's Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. 2008) (Exhibit "P"). + +37. Because of the violation of the CVRA, on July 7, 2008, filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, seeking to enforce the rights of E.W. and L.M. That action alleged that the U.S. Attorney's Office had failed to provide E.W. and L.M. the rights to which they were entitled under the Act, including the right to be notified about a plea agreement and to confer with prosecutors regarding it. See id. + +38. On July 11, 2008, took E.W. and L.M. with him to the hearing on the CVRA action. It was only at this hearing that both victims learned for the first time that the plea deal was already done with Epstein and that the criminal case against Epstein had been effectively terminated by the U.S. Attorney's office. See Hearing Transcript, July 11, 2008 (Exhibit "Q"). + +39. learned that Jane Doe felt so strongly that the plea bargain was inappropriate that she made her own determination to appear on a television program\_ and exercise her First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received in a criminal case. + +40. The CVRA action that filed was recently administratively closed and filed a Motion to reopen that proceeding. See No. 9:08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.). + +## Eftwein's Entry of Guilty P eas to SelOffenses + +41. Ultimately, on June 30, 2008, in 84c1 h Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, defendant Epstein, entered pleas solicitation of minors for prostitution ocurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution. See Plea Colloquy (Exhibit "R"). 1(' to various Florida state crimes involving the + +42. As a condition of that plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant, 'Epstein additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government acknowledging that approximately thirty-four (34) other young girls could receive payments from him under the federal statute providing for compensation to victims of child sexual abuse, 18 U.S.C. § 2255. As had been agreed months before, the U.S. Attorney's Office did not prosecute Epstein federally for his sexual abuse of these minor girls. See Addendum to Non-Prosecution Agreement (Exhibit "S") (in redacted form to protect the identities of the minors involved). + +43. Because Epstein became a convicted sex offender, he was not to have contact with any of his victims. During the course of his guilty pleas on June 30, 2008, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo ordered Epstein "not to have any contact, direct or indirect" with any victims. She also expressly stated that her no-contact order applied to "all of the victims." Similar orders were entered by the federal court handling some of the civil cases against Epstein. The federal court stated that it "finds it necessary to state clearly that Defendant is under this court's order not ve direct or indirect contact with any plaintiffs . ..." Order, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119 (S. 0 . 008), [DE 238] at 4-5 (emphasis added); see also Order, Case No. 9:08-cv-80893, [DE 193 hasis added). + +# Files Civil Suits Against 5 in - + +44. had a good faith belief that his clien and t and betrayed by the criminal system wished to prosecute and punish Epstein for Nisn e es against them in whatever avenue :, remained open to them. On August 12, 2008, at the request of his client Jane Doe, Brad filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recove age\* for his sexual assault of Jane Doe. See Affidavit, "N" at ¶7. Included in thi p in was a RICO count that explained how Epstein ran a criminal conspiracy to procure young gir s for him to sexually abuse. See Complaint, Jane Doe v. Epstein (Exhibit "T"). + +45. On September 11;2008, at the request of his client E.W., Brad filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of E.W. See Complaint, E.W. v. Epstein (Exhibit "U"). + +46. On September 11, 2008, at the request of his client L.M.., Brad filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, L.M. v. Epstein, (Exhibit "V"). + +47. Jane Doe's federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than \$50,000,000. + +Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord with other civil suits that were filed against Epstein (before any lawsuit filed by ). See Complaint, Jane Doe #4 v. Epstein (Exhibit "W") (filed by Herman and Mermelstein, PA). + +48. At about the same time as filed his three lawsuits against Epstein, other civil attorneys were filing similar lawsuits against Epstein. For example, on or about April 14, 2008 another law firm, Herman and Mermelstein, filed the first civil action against Epstein on behalf of one of its seven clients who were molested by Epstein. The complaints that attorney Herman filed on behalf of his seven clients were similar in tenor and tone to the complaint that Edwards filed on behalf of his three clients. See id. + +49. Over the next year and a half, more than 20 other similar civil actions were filed by various attorneys against Epstein alleging sexual assault of mipor girls. These complaints were also similar in tenor and tone to the complaint that fil alf of his clients. These complaints are all public record and have not been attached, b a ilable in this Court's files and the files of the U.S. District Court for the Southern Districttf Flo a. + +50. In addition to the complaints filed against Epstein in Florida, a female in New York, Ava filed a lawsuit against Ed. in New York making similar allegations - that Epstein paid her for a massage then f? ed her to give him oral sex and molested her in other ways when she was only 16 years old. er was born a male, and in her complaint she alleges that Epstein told her during the "massat ove how young you are. You have a tight butt like a baby". See Jeff Epstein Sued for "Repeated Sexual Assaults" on Teen, New York Post, October 17, 2007, by Dareh Gregorian, link at: + +http://www.nvpost.com/p/news/regional/item 44 zl WvLUFH7R1OU tK YGPbP; sessionid=6CA3EBF1 + +BEF68F5DEI4BFB2CAA5C37E0. See Article attached hereto as Exhibit "X". + +51. three complaints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit "B"). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell discovered her and lured her to Epstein's house. Maxwell and Epstein forced her to have sex with both of them and within weeks Maxwell and Epstein were flying her all over the world. According to the Complaint, iane Doe 102 was forced to live as one of Epstein's underage sex slaves for years and was forced to have sex with not only Maxwell and Epstein but also other politicians, businessmen, royalty, academicians, etc. She was even made to watch Epstein have sex with three 12-year-old girls that were sent to him for his birthday by a citizen that is a friend of Epstein's. \ Luckily, Jane Doe 102 escaped to / Australia to get away from Epstein and Maxwell's sexual abuse. \_/ + +52. learned that in addition t sdlfts that were filed in court against Epstein, at around the same time other attorneys engag p ling settlement discussions with Epstein. Rather than face filed civil suits in these case aid money settlements to more than 15 other women who had sexually abused while they were minors. See articles regarding settlements attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "Y." + +# EDS 's Obst uction of Normal Discovery and Attacks on His Victims + +53. Once filed his civil complaints for his three clients, he began the normal \ process of discovery for cases such as these. He sent standard discovery requests to Epstein about his sexual abuse of the minor girls, including requests for admissions, request for production, and interrogatories. See Affidavit, Exhibit "N", at ¶¶11-19 and 25. + +Rather than answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse and his conspiracy for procuring minor girls for him to abuse, Epstein invoked his 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. An + +example of Epstein's refusal to answer is attached as Composite Exhibit "1" (original discovery propounded to Epstein and his responses invoking 5th amendment). + +54. During the discovery phase of the civil cases filed against Epstein, Epstein's deposition was taken at least five times. During all of those depositions, Epstein refused to answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse of minor girls. See, e.g., Deposition Attachments 1, 6 and 7. + +55. During these depositions, Epstein further attempted to obstruct legitimate questioning by inserting a variety of irrelevant information about his case. As one of innumerable examples, on March 8, 2010, Mr. Horowitz, representing seven victims, Jane Doe's 2-8, asked, "Q: in 2004, did you rub Jane Doe 3's vagina? A: Excuse me. I'd like to answer that question, as I would like to answer mostly every question you've asked me here today; however, upon advice of counsel, I cannot answer that question. They've advised me I must Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Rights against self c e, against--under the Constitution. And though your partner, Jeffrey Herman, was di ter partner sits in jail for fabricating cases of a sexual nature fleecing unsuspecting Florida investors and others out of Onions of dollars for cases of a sexual nature with--I'd like to answer your questions; however if 1--I'm told that if I do so, I risk losing my counsel's representation; therefore I must accept their advice." Epstein deposition, March 8, 2010, at 106 (Deposition attachment #10). filing this lawsuit [a statement that was untrue], Mr. + +56. When had the opportunity to take Epstein's deposition, he only asked reasonable questions, all of which related to the merits of the cases against Epstein. All depositions of Epstein in which Mr. participated on behalf of his clients are attached to this motion. See Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶11 and Deposition attachments #1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Cf. with Deposition of Epstein taken by an attorney representing BB (one in which was not + +http://www.voutube.com/watch?v=YCNiY1tW-r0 + +57. efforts to obtain information about Epstein's organization for procuring young girls was also blocked because Epstein's co-conspirators took the Fifth. Deposition of March 24, 2010 (hereinafter Depo.") (Deposition attachment #14); Deposition of April 13, 2010, (Deposition attachment #9); Deposition of MOIlla March 15, 2010 (hereinafter "M Depo.") (Deposition attachment #1(5)., ch of these coconspirators invoked their respective rights against self-incrimination a.? ha all relevant questions, and the depositions have been attached. + +58. At all relevant times has had a go f asis to believe and did in fact IASS, identified as a defendant in at least one of the complaints against Epstein for her rol 4 4sng i girls to Epstein's mansion to be abused. At the deposition, she was represented by ce 'nhart. She invoked the Fifth on all substantive believe was an employee of Epstein's questions regarding her role in arrangi prTpinor girls to come to Epstein's mansion to be sexually abused. Reinhart had previous! y been b ah Assistant United States Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern of Florida when Epstein was being investigated criminally by Reinhart's office. Reinhart left the United States Attorney's Office and was immediately hired by Epstein to repreienttpsteln's pilots and certain co-conspirators during the civil cases against Epstein. See davit, Exhibit "N" at 911. + +59. also had other lines of legitimate discovery blocked through the efforts of Epstein and others. For example, learned through deposition that Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in managing Epstein's affairs and companies. See deposition of Epstein's house manager Janusz Banziak, February 16, 2010 at page 14, lines 20-23 (Deposition Attachment #16); See + +See Deposition of Rodriguez, Deposition attachment # 8 at 6 60. Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Maxwell took photos of girls without the girls' knowledge, kept the images on her computer, knew the names of a undetage girls and their respective phone numbers and other underage victims were molest n and Maxwell together. and 236. + +deposition of Epstein's housekeeper October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17-25 (Deposition Attachment #17); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene a October 6, 2009, page 102-103 (Deposition Attachment #18); See deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez, August 7, 2009, page 302-306 and 348 (Deposition Attachment #8); See also Prince Andrew's Friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, Some Underage Girls and A Very Disturbing Story, September 23, 2007 by Wendy Leigh, link at http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=1895OHANNA Exhibit "AA". + +61. In reasonable reliance on this and other i o tion, served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attachertas hibit "BB." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of and Gresser, and understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. .She was reluctant to give her deposition, and tried di to work with her attorney to take Iteposition on terms that would be acceptable to both sides. The result was the attached confi 'ality agreement, under which Maxwell agreed to drop any objections to the deposition, attached ereto as Exhibit "CC." Maxwell, however, contrived to avoid the deposition. On June 29, 2010, one day before was to fly to NY to take Maxwell's deposition, her attorney informed that Maxwell's mother was deathly ill and Maxwell was consequently flying to England with no intention of returning to the United States. Despite that assertion, Ghislaine Maxwell was in fact in the country on July 31, 2010, as she attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton (former President Clinton's daughter) and was captured in a photograph taken for OK magazine. Photos from Issue 809 of the publication See US Weekly dated August 16, 2010 are attached hereto as + +Exhibit "DD" and Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶12. + +62. Maxwell is not the only important witness to lie to avoid deposition by Upon review of the message pads that were taken from Epstein's home in the police trash pulls, see Exhibit "J" supra, many were from Jean Luc Brunel, a citizen and one of Epstein's closest pals. He left messages for Epstein. One dated 4/1/05 said, "He has a teacher for you to teach you how to speak Russian. She is 2x8 years old, not blonde. Lessons are free and you can have your 14 today if you call." See Messages taken from Jean Luc Brunel are attached hereto as ExhibitYEE." In light of these circumstances of the case, this message reasonably suggested to a that Brunel might have been procuring two eight-year-old girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. According to widely circulated press reports reviewed by Brunel is in his sixties and has a reputation throughout the world (and especially in the modeling industry) as a cocaine addict that has for years molested children through modeling agencies while acting as their agent —,conduct that has been the subject of critical reports, books, several news articles, and a 60 IsA, inutes documentary on Brunel's sexual exploitation of --- underage models. See http://bradmillashero.blogsoot.com/2010/08/women-are-objects.html, attached hereto as Exhibit "FF." + +63. learned that Brunel is also someone that visited Epstein on approximately 67 occasions while Epstein was in jail. See Epstein's jail visitor log attached as Exhibit "GO." + +64. learned that Brunel currently runs the modeling agency MC2, a company for which Epstein provides financial support. See Message Pad's attached as Exhibit "J" supra and Sworn Statement of MC2 employee Maritza Vasquez, June 15, 2010, "Maritza Vasquez Sworn Statement" attached at Exhibit "HH" at 1-16. + +65. Employees of MC2 told that Epstein's numerous condos at 301 East 66 Street in New York were used to house young models. was told that MC2 modeling agency, + +affiliated with Epstein and Brunel brought underage girls from all over the world, promising them modeling contracts. Epstein and Brunel would then obtain a visa for these girls, then would charge the underage girls rent, presumably to live as underage prostitutes in the condos. See Maritza Vasquez Sworn Statement, Exhibit "HH" at 7-10, 12-15, 29-30, 39-41, 59-60 and 62-67. + +66. In view of this information suggesting Brunel could provide significant evidence of Epstein's trafficking in young girls for sexual abuse, had Brunel served-fitzNew York for /m) deposition. See Notice of Deposition of Jean Luc Brunel attached hereto as Exhibit "II." Before the deposition took place, Brunel's attorney (Tama Kudman of West Palm Beach) contacted to delay the deposition date. Eventually Kudman informed in January 2009 that Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return. This information was untrue; Brunel was actually staying with Epstein in West Palm Beach. See Banasiak deposition, deposition attachment #16 at 154-160 and 172-175; see also pages from Epstein's probation file evidencing Jean Luc Brunel (JLB) staying at his house during that relevant period of time attached Exhibit "1.1". As a result, filed a Motion for Contempt, attached hereto as Exhibit "KK" (Because Epstein settled this case, the motion was never ruled upon.) + +67. was also informed that Epstein paid for not only Brunel's representation during the civil process but also paid for legal representation for (Epstein's executive assistant and procurer of girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein's personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein's personal pilot), Larry (Epstein's personal pilot), (Epstein's housekeeper), (Epstein's live-in sex slave), Ghislaine Maxwell (manager of Epstein's affairs and businesses), Mark Epstein (Epstein's brother), and Janusz Banasiak (Epstein's house manager) It was nearly impossible to take a deposition of someone that would have helpful information that was not represented by an attorney paid for by Epstein. See Affidavit, + +Exhibit "N" at ¶11. + +68. While Epstein and others were preventing any legitimate discovery into his sexual abuse of minor girls, at the same time he was engaging (through his attorneys) in brutal questioning of the girls who had filed civil suits against him, questioning so savage that it made local headlines. See Jane Musgrave, Victims Seeking Sex offender's Millions See Painful Pasts Used Against Them, Palm Beach Post News, Jan. 23, 2010, available at httn://www.palmbeachoost.com/neivs4me/victimsseekinn-sex-offenders-millions-see-painful-pasts-192988.html attached hereto "LL." + +# Pursues Other Lines of Discove + +69. Because of Epstein's thwarting of discovery and attacks on clients, was forced to pursue other avenues of discovery. Edwards only pursued legitimate discovery designed to further the cases filed against Epstein. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶11. + +70. notified Epstein's attorneys of his intent to take Bill Clinton's deposition. possessed a legitimate basis for doing so: (a) Clinton was friends with Ghislaine Maxwell / -- who was Epstein's longtime companion and helped to run Epstein's companies, kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein, engaged in lesbian sex with underage females that she procured for Epstein, and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses and kept child pornography on her computer; (b) it was national news when Clinton traveled With Epstein aboard Epstein's private plane to Africa and the news articles classified Clinton as Epstein's friend. (c) the complaint filed on behalf of Jane Doe No. 102 stated generally that she was required by Epstein to be sexually exploited by not only Epstein but also Epstein's "adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal acquaintances" — categories Clinton and acquaintances of Clinton fall into. The flight logs showed Clinton traveling on Epstein's plane on numerous occasions between 2002 and 2005. See + +Flight logs attached hereto as Exhibit "MM." Clinton traveled on many of those flights with Ghislaine Maxwell, and - all employees and/or co-conspirators of Epstein's that were closely connected to Epstein's child exploitation and sexual abuse. The documents clearly show that Clinton frequently flew with Epstein aboard his plane, then suddenly stopped - raising the suspicion that the friendship abruptly ended, perhaps because of events related to Epstein's sexual abuse of children. Epstein's personal phone directory from his computer contains e-mail'addresses for Clinton along with 21 phone numbers for him, including those for his assistant (Doug Band), his schedulers, and what appear to be Clinton's personal numbers. This information -certainly leads one to believe that Clinton might well be a source of relevant information and efforts to obtain discovery from him were reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evide ,txhibits "B", "F" "AA", "DD", and "MM" and Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 115.ze14/\ + +71. J. a, Esq., provided notice that he intended to take the deposition of Donald Trump. possessed a legiti ate basis for doing so: (a) The message pads confiscated from Epstein's home indicated that Triimp \ lied Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion on several occasions during the time period most relevant to my clients' complaints; (b) Trump was quoted in a Vanity Fair article about Epstein as saying "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy," "He's a lot of fun to bewith. kis even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the, younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Jeffrey Epstein: International-Moneyman of Mystery; He's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't until he flew Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, and Chris Tucker to Africa on his private Boeing 727 that the world began to wonder who he is. By Landon Jr. (See article attached hereto as Exhibit "NN") (c) Trump allegedly banned Epstein from his Maralago Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein + +sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club; (d) Jane Doe No. 102's complaint alleged that Jane Doe 102 was initially approached at Trump's Maralago by Ghislaine Maxwell and recruited to be Maxwell and Epstein's underage sex slave; (e) Mark Epstein (Jeffrrey Epstein's brother) testified that Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein's plane with him (the same plane that Jane Doe 102 alleged was used to have sex with underage girls); (0 Trump had been to Epstein's home in Palm Beach; (g) Epstein's phone directory from his computer contains 14 phone numbers for Donald Trump, including emergency numbers, car numbers, and numbers to Trump's security guard and houseman. Based on this information, reasonably believed that Trump might have relevant information to provide in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and accordingly provided notice of a possible deposition. See deposition of Mark Epstein, September 21, 2009, at 48-50 (Deposition Attachment #19); See Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, Exhibit "B"; Exhibit "F"; "Exhibit"J"; ' SI154 Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 113. + +72. provided notice t 1S ended to depose Alan Dershowitz. t possessed a legitimate basis for doing t ) rshowitz is believed to have been friends with Epstein for many years; (b) in one news article Dershowitz comments that, "I'm on my 20th book... The only person outside of my imme arnily that I send drafts to is Jeffrey" The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky on ..." Janu 2005 n Published Work, Vanity Fair (See article attached as Exhibit "OO"); ,.i (c) Epstein's ho Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz stayed at Epstein's house during the years v stein was assaulting minor females on a daily basis; (d) Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz was at Epstein's house at times when underage females where there being molested by Epstein (see Alfredo Rodriguez deposition at 278-280, 385, 426-427); (e) Dershowitz reportedly assisted in attempting to persuade the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office that because the underage females alleged to have been victims of Epstein's abuse lacked credibility and could not be believed + +that they were at Epstein's house, when Dershowitz himself was an eyewitness to their presence at the house; (f) Jane Doe No. 102 stated generally that Epstein forced her to be sexually exploited by not only Epstein but also Epstein's "adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal acquaintances" — categories that Dershowitz and acquaintances of Dershowitz fall into; (g) during the years 2002-2005 Alan Dershowitz was on Epstein's plane on several occasions according to the flight logs produced by EpsteisVs pilot and information (described above) suggested that sexual assaults may have takmplace won the plane; (h) ( \J7 Epstein donated \$30 Million one year to the university at which Dershowitz teaches. Based on this information, had a reasonable basis to believe that Dershowitz might have relevant information to provide in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Jack Scarola Searcy, Penne , Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 68 + +(561 (f ) VFlori No.: 169440 + +13y: + +## SERVICE LIST + +E. Knight, Esq. L. Ackerman, Esq. BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +sr , Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + ++o + +Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0607ee35762639f58a98e07c211e7acfba6fead3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751/EFTA02765751.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1578 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765751.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 38, + "chars": 75232, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.424, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 305.424, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.70799999999997, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 413.29200000000003, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 413.29200000000003, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 192.70799999999997, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.31199999999995, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 392.082, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 392.082, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 213.31199999999995, + 484.37999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Federal Investigation and Plea Agreement With Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.648, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 440.9771728515625, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 440.9771728515625, + 112.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 165.648, + 112.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"UNITED STATES*.JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.724, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 459.5210876464844, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 459.5210876464844, + 457.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 143.724, + 457.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Agrees to Serve as Legal Counsel for Three Victims of Epstein's Sexual Assaults", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.98400000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 526.528, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 526.528, + 85.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 89.98400000000001, + 85.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Eftwein's Entry of Guilty P eas to SelOffenses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.35399999999998, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 417.4178161621094, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 417.4178161621094, + 360.0535583496094 + ], + [ + 186.35399999999998, + 360.0535583496094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Files Civil Suits Against 5 in -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.524, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 420.3221740722656, + 288.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 420.3221740722656, + 305.31353759765625 + ], + [ + 201.524, + 305.31353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDS 's Obst uction of Normal Discovery and Attacks on His Victims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.68399999999997, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 475.57037353515625, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 475.57037353515625, + 526.113037109375 + ], + [ + 128.68399999999997, + 526.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pursues Other Lines of Discove", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.70700000000002, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 408.639, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 408.639, + 278.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 196.70700000000002, + 278.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Harassment of Witnesses Against Him", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 422.8458251953125, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 422.8458251953125, + 113.31353759765625 + ], + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 113.31353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Settlement of Civil Claims Against Him for Sexual Abuse of Children", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.14000000000001, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 490.89007568359375, + 620.46 + ], + [ + 490.89007568359375, + 636.0535278320312 + ], + [ + 115.14000000000001, + 636.0535278320312 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Takes the Filth When Asked Substantive Questions About HistIaims Against", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.83999999999999, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 492.88399999999996, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 492.88399999999996, + 277.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 72.83999999999999, + 277.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 385.8902587890625, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 385.8902587890625, + 248.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 248.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.762, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 348.04571533203125, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 348.04571533203125, + 126.5985107421875 + ], + [ + 258.762, + 126.5985107421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765751" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..447aee0252caa73b69f3d834950b5ed55c2d48ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 09, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. , individually and J. , individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) Appellee / Respondent(s) + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +The \$300.00 filing fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with sections 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, dij not accompany the petition as required in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100.). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PETITIOti NELSEQUENTLY VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED OR ADVERSELY DISMISSED. + +ORDERED sua sponte that the \$300.00 filin fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with section 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, must be filed in this Court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the petition has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the petition is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. + +\*\*NOTE: No extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until this filing fee is paid or until an affidavit of indigency is filed and indigency status is granted. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach John Scarola Marc S. Nurik Rachel Glasser Scott J. Link + +Cairn Mier Nichole J. Segal + +J. Clerk Palm Beach + +kw + +*Lonn Weissblum* + +**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +**Fourth District Court of Appeal** + +![](_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg) + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd57a4cce9191fef0cfa5eae96d9dccd2a8a58d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/EFTA02765789.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1991, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.14, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 220.51206970214844, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 220.51206970214844, + 286.9436340332031 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 286.9436340332031 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 364 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765789" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42a869dbc5edd6f177b48120a7b04e14ef3cbe6a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765789/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1225e9eb3c2126255845e0c6d86380a5a7b86a288041026d22e0ffed0447af66 +size 19577 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c14e1d6adc88c6d56e1c670616270654d282e15d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT' ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ACSA ) NOTICE OF UMC RING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff a pstcin, will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before the Honor' nald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 i ighway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Default Against Defendant Scott Rothstein + +DATE: ( S Thursday, , March 15, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +# LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on March 9, 2018, through the Court's c of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +O S + +LINKi3 ACH, PA 155 4 4%7 B h Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 I each, Florida 33401 ) 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +\* + +ir/s/ Scott I Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tanya@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algun c miento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho, -sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la ama i "dad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highwa t Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19.tne dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." y r + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou akte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27e362bd6978af8124755529801f1b4ed516960b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791/EFTA02765791.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765791.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8038, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 111.603515625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 111.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACSA )\nNOTICE OF UMC RING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 328.9380798339844 + ], + [ + 394.606201171875, + 328.9380798339844 + ], + [ + 394.606201171875, + 356.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 356.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765791" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a5a0a90865e29c96312b887bb2561e0414c4852 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.md @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTIEN, + +Defendant. + +L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +CL.4). + +# ORDER-ON AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS + +In hearings in the above-styled matter conducted on Thursday, March 8, 2018, an order was announced from the bench sealing specific pleadings alleged to contain attorney-client and work product privileged information. No written order was transmitted to the Clerk of Court and the confidential nit were made available to the public by posting on the Clerk's docket Friday ev + +this case has been the focus of widespread public attention, the parties have a substantial concern that further avoidable breaches of confidentiality will occur, if the Clerk is not directed to take immediate action to seal the two filings at issue as soon as possible. + +V. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXMBAG + +#### AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS + +The specific filings are: + +Docket Entry 1242, a 353-page filing with attachments containing actual emails as well as a summary of the contents of those emails. The document is titled: NOTICE OF FILING OF REDACTED APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION IN LIMINE ADDRESSING SCOPE OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE F/B PLT/COUNTER-DFT JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +Docket Entry 1252 with attachments also needs to be sealed. It is entitled MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS. AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER F/B PLT/COUNTER-DFT FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS. AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED STY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL F/B PLT/COUNTER-DFT. + +The parties are in agreement that the Clerk be directed to seal the above referenced filings including the attachments thereto, and the Clerk is directed to do so forthwith. + +Done and Ordered this 12th day of March, 2018, nuns pro h 8, 2018. + +DON D It LE CI CULT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +V. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG + +AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +\_scarolateam®seareylaw.com 44 alk" + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA O + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 C N + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +J. Esquire + +iS 4/) 9 + +Attorneys for J. + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahonty .com + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. ) + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400' + +West Palm Beach, FL 334 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for J ENtein + +Nichole J. S'Sga &quire + +njs@FLAWelftiteLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for + +Berard Rockenbach, Esquire + +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez®flacivillaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +V. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXNIBAG + +AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +\_scarolateam®searcylaw.com + +Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +J. Esquire + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldbergen@agwpascom; smahon .corn + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite + +West Palm Beach, FL 33 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-869 + +Attorneys for Jeffray Lein + +Nichole J. S ire + +njs®F w.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com + +Burlington ockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Rail Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for- + +Berard Rockenbach, Esquire + +Icara®linkrocIdaw.com; tbermudez®flacivillaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXMRAG + +AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linIcrocklaw.com; Kara@linkroc m; + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkr la + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 AS ) + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +? S' + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothste + +(AS: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f21e4b4d583f2b70b59d3a3fcc948b09242afb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795/EFTA02765795.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765795.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5083, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.284, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 532.50390625, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 532.50390625, + 125.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 310.284, + 125.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER-ON AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 395.28 + ], + [ + 510.2149658203125, + 395.28 + ], + [ + 510.2149658203125, + 410.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 410.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEAL FILINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 121.08758544921875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 121.08758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 348.3669128417969, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 348.3669128417969, + 184.10302734375 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 184.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 352.07159423828125, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 352.07159423828125, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 175.76999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 166 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765795" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8862bfe87b59e44cfd76cc35381aa604ce4d6b2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.md @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXX,MIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS F FEBRUARY 23, 2018, DEP Y EPSTEIN'S AM BERGER'S RANSCRIPT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey testimony from William Berger's Feb \* 23 case and/or as rebuttal. aintiff') hereby designates the following 18, deposition transcript for use in the instant + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter / Cross Designation | Objections | Response to Objections | +|-------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------| +| 5:9-6:1 | | | | +| 9:8-17 | | | | +| 10:17-22 | | | | +| 15:2-16:9 | | | | +| 16:25 | | | | +| 17:2-12 | | | | +| 18:8-11 | | | | +| 18:16-20 | | | | +| 55:10-13 | | | | +| 55:17-56:1 | | | | +| 56:7-58:12 | | | | +| 58:14-59:16 | | | | +| 59:19-60:13 | | | | +| 60:16 | | | | +| 60:18-61:19 | | | | +| 62:12-13 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 62:15 | | | | +| 62:17-63:18 | | | | +| 63:25-64:5 | | | | +| 65:4-6 | | | | +| 65:13-20 | | | | +| 66:13-19 | | | | +| 66:24-25 | | | | +| 67:23-24 | | | | +| 68:9-11 | | | | +| 69:23-25 | | | | +| 70:3-25 | | | | +| 71:13-72:13 | | | | +| 72:21-75:3 | | | | +| 75:8-16 | | | | +| 75:19-76:1 | | | | +| 76:11-15 | | | | +| 77:11-14 | | | | +| 77:17 | | | | +| 77:21-78:5 | | | | +| 78:10-79:6 | | | | +| 79:22-80:7 | | | | +| 80:16-20 | | | | +| 81:3-20 | | | | +| 81:25-82:13 | | | | +| 82:16-84:2 | | | | +| 84:5 | | | | +| 84:19-87:11 | | | | +| 87:14-88:4 | | | | +| 88:7-89:5 | | | | +| 89:17-91:3 | | | | +| 91:13-92:6 | | | | +| 92:14-97:10 | | | | +| 97:16-100:2 | | | | +| 100:5 | | | | +| 100:18-104:13 | | | | +| 107:9-24 | | | | +| 108:2-14 | | | | +| 108:16-23 | | | | +| 110:14-111:2 | | | | +| 111:4-9 | | | | +| 111:11-112:9 | | | | +| 112:12-19 | | | | +| 112:24-114:13 | | | | +| 114:17-117:7 | | | | +| 117:12-120:17 | | | | +| 120:21-122:4 | | | | +| 122:16-21 | | | | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------| +| 123:10-124:1 | | | | +| 125:1-4 | | | | +| 125:7-12 | | | | +| 125:15-126:18 | | | | +| 126:21-127:1 | | | | +| 127:5-9 | | | | +| 127:14-129:22 | | | | +| 130:6-23 | | | | +| 138:11-139:9 | | | | +| 139:17-140:7 | | | | +| 141:16-24 | | | | +| 144:5-8 | | | | +| 144:18-145:2 | | | | +| 146:15-147:5 | | | | +| 148:24-149:5 | | | | +| 150:17-24 | | | | +| 151:4-13 | | | | +| 152:1-153:25 | | | | +| 154:2-11 | | | | +| 154:23-156:2 | | | | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 9, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Ices B lebard West Palm Beac 334 9 mep@scarcylaw.com jsxasearcvlacv.com scarolateamOseardylaw.com Co-Co Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. wards & Shipley, P.A. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suifk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By. + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken Rachel J. GI Primary: Primary: Prim S BN 44903) 7251) ocklaw.com krocklaw.com achelMinkrocklaw.com TrovQ1inIcrocklaw.com : Eservice(alinIcrocklaw.com s rY + +Jeffrey Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Epstein + +## RVICE LIST + +Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 njs(4FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@,FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiardant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 brad@eplIc.com marc@nuriklaw.com staftefile®pathtojustice.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel or J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 ,1OAlk West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldbergerOagwpa.com smahonev®aewpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ...agia. + +O + +C .- + +v \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f069b98ac335afce26012608c9711d7ddeda103a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800/EFTA02765800.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765800.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 11423, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN \nDEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS F \nFEBRUARY 23, 2018, DEP \nY EPSTEIN'S \nAM BERGER'S \nRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765800" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8330e63edc6b2b5097b4948969152c99860355c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.md @@ -0,0 +1,719 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants, + +cos + +#### DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S Al 6.D PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, counsel, hereby files his Amended Propo J nstructions and Verdict Forms for trial in the above-styled matter. 3. EDWARDS, by and through undersigned + +filed his initial\ Propo d Jury Instructions and Verdict Form on November 9, 2017. On November 13, 2017, filed his First Supplement to that pleading, which added V v a proposed jury ins ction tegarding Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404. On Novembe(382017, filed his Second Supplement, which added proposed jury instructions c e!Larding probable cause (based upon the authority of Liabos v. Hannan, 215 So. 2d 487, 489-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)) and a proposed jury instruction based upon the ancient law of natural and probable consequences of one's actions. On February 16, 2018, filed his Third Supplement concerning a fact that has been stipulated to by Epstein's counsel. revised his Proposed Instruction on Adverse Inference at the hearings in this matter on March 8, 2018. + +These Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form incorporate all prior submissions and revisions and also contain other revisions and additions based on the Court's recent rulings as to the admissibility of various evidence at trial. + +[REDACTED] has also included his Verdict Form, which was inadvertently left off the initial filing. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 3 of 55 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS + +### **201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE** + +Welcome. The Clerk will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a disagreement between people or companies [or others, as appropriate], where the claims of one or more of these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +*This case concerns the following. Beginning in the summer of 2008, [REDACTED] represented three females, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who alleged to have been sexually molested as minors by Jeffrey Epstein. At the same time, dozens of other alleged victims were identified as having been sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein, and many of those underage children retained lawyers in order to file civil claims against Epstein. Attorney [REDACTED] in coordination with those other attorneys, took a leading role in coordinated discovery efforts in those sexual abuse lawsuits.* + +*Also in the summer of 2008, Attorney [REDACTED] was lead counsel in a separate lawsuit against the federal government, which sought to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement that Epstein had entered into with the federal government. Under the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the Federal Government agreed to refrain from filing Federal criminal charges against Epstein in exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to two state felony charges concerning his alleged molestation of children, for which he was registered as a Sex Offender and sentenced to 18 months incarceration followed by a period of house arrest.* + +*In April of 2009, Attorney [REDACTED] took a job at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler law firm. Approximately six months later, while Attorney [REDACTED] was prosecuting his clients' sexual molestation/abuse claims against Epstein and pursuing the separate federal action to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm, Scott Rothstein, had secretly been engaged in a massive Ponzi scheme since 2005. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millions of dollars from 2005 to 2009 and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. While Rothstein's Ponzi scheme began years before Attorney [REDACTED] sued Epstein and years before Attorney [REDACTED] was employed by Rothstein's law firm, after [REDACTED] joined the firm, Rothstein used the claims against Epstein to attract additional Ponzi scheme investors. The fact that Rothstein used the pending claims against Epstein to attract investors in the Ponzi scheme is not disputed. Epstein sued [REDACTED] for knowingly assisting Rothstein in the Ponzi scheme and accused [REDACTED] in that Complaint of committing a number of serious criminal offenses. Whether Epstein had probable cause to support that claim is an issue for you to decide in this case.* + +Rothstein's scheme was disclosed by the media in November of 2009, and on December 1, 2009 Rothstein was indicted by the federal government. [REDACTED]'s name was never associated with Rothstein's criminal scheme and he was not indicted or criminally investigated. Nonetheless, six days later, Jeffrey Epstein sued Rothstein, [REDACTED] and L.M., one of Epstein's victims. At the time Epstein filed this lawsuit, he had already settled thirteen sexual molestation claims brought by other underage females, and he faced more than two dozen pending sexual molestation claims, including those being pursued by Mr. [REDACTED] on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Mr. [REDACTED] also continued to pursue the federal action to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement and continues to prosecute that claim through the present. + +In his 5-count lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein alleged that Mr. [REDACTED] committed numerous crimes against Epstein while prosecuting fabricated or exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits on behalf of Mr. [REDACTED] three underage clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, these claims were "weak" and had "minimal value," and the real reason Mr. [REDACTED] pursued those false sexual molestation claims on behalf of the minor child victims was to knowingly assist in a criminal Ponzi scheme. In the lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein also sought, in part, to stop all of the lawsuits that had been filed by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, the three underage females represented by [REDACTED] regarding the sexual molestation committed upon them by Epstein. + +Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed knowingly false allegations in the absence of probable cause and with malice when he filed the lawsuit in 2009, and that Jeffrey Epstein continued to prosecute these knowingly false allegations for years. + +This case therefore concerns whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to file and continue that lawsuit against Attorney Bradley [REDACTED], alleging that Mr. [REDACTED] had committed criminal acts against Jeffrey Epstein while [REDACTED] was prosecuting fabricated or exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits on behalf of three underage female children, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who [REDACTED] alleged were repeatedly sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein over a period of years when they were minor children. Epstein claims he had probable cause to file the claim in 2009 and that he had probable cause to continue pursuing those claims through the time when Epstein dismissed those claims in August 2012. + +Bradley Edwards contends that the lawsuits he prosecuted on behalf of his 3 clients were well-founded. Although Jeffrey Epstein sued [REDACTED] based, in part, on the allegation that the lawsuits were not well-founded, he has recently conceded that all of the lawsuits Attorney [REDACTED] filed on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe were filed by [REDACTED] in good-faith. + +Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed the lawsuit against Attorney [REDACTED] in order to intimidate Mr. [REDACTED] into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims, and to intimidate the dozens of other victims who were pursuing claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this suit out of malice for Mr. [REDACTED], who was coordinating much of the discovery being taken by all of the alleged underage victims, not just L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Finally, Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this lawsuit to punish Attorney [REDACTED] for a lawsuit Attorney [REDACTED] had filed against the federal government, in which Attorney [REDACTED], on behalf of his clients, sought to overturn the plea agreement Jeffrey Epstein had entered into with the federal government which + +*in essence immunized Jeffrey Epstein from being federally prosecuted for the federal sex offenses the government had discovered had been committed against at least 40 minors..* + +*Attorney [REDACTED] defended against Epstein's lawsuit, challenging it on the grounds that it had no legal or factual support. Shortly before the Court was scheduled to rule on Mr. [REDACTED] challenge, Epstein dismissed all of his claims against Attorney [REDACTED]. Furthermore, Epstein allowed the statute of limitations to expire making it legally impossible for Epstein to bring any claims based on the conduct he sued upon in the original complaint. While Epstein denies [REDACTED] claim for malicious prosecution, Epstein has refused to answer any questions about the validity of the civil claims [REDACTED] prosecuted on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe.* + +*Finally, although Epstein claimed that the cases being pursued by L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe were "weak" and had "minimal value" and were only being pursued by Edwards in furtherance of [REDACTED] participation in a criminal Ponzi scheme, Epstein eventually settled the claims brought by [REDACTED] for a total of \$5.5 million.* + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +# 201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and decide how to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that you will need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on the issues of th a uit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plaintiff A party that i is called the Defendant. 0 + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of representing their el' at is, they speak for their clients here at the trial. They have taken oaths as atto their best and to follow the rules of their profession. + +Plaintiffs Counsel: The attorney on this 404Se " the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents and is the person who filed 4C14••0 in dispute. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. Mr. Scarola and 11 be referred to most of the time as "the plaintiff. Mr. Scarola, will you please int uce is sitting at the table with you? + +Defendant's Coun st• The ir attorney on this side of the courtroom, Scott Link, represents Jeffrey Epstein, the cwho as been sued. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. He and his cli 11 ally be referred to here as "the defendant". Mr. Link, will you please introdu "s ing at the table with you? + +Co Clerk:This person sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. He/She is here to assist me with some of the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that are introduced in the course of the trial. + +any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. His/Her job is to main order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. An g • thg need or t to him/her. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the ca can do that. + +Court Reporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. His/Her job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Jurv: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begi among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what th Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point ect in a few moments from and what the facts mean. o fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial rule is that jurors must decide the case o must not communicate with anyo people and places involved, or y les that all jurors must follow. A basic the evidence presented in the courtroom. You g friends and family members, about this case, the service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on h ecide this case. + +I want to computers posting in rmation on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or that this rule means you must not use electronic devices or nicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, maps, or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom. + +'You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not e your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or c ui ate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not ta graphs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow ju rs. a end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with e outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the cou e messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number wi ed to you. + +What are the reasons for these rul T rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction an on tlSe evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make in u s your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that i formation you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportu dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary to our judi l system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and challenge ce being considered against it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Anyndependent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start over. A mistrial is a tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the taxpayers. If you violate + +Alternative B Instruction + +these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, such as serving time in jail, paying a fine or both. + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, or me, will be part of the record of these proceedings. That means those communications shall either be made in court reporter open 4,urt with the present or, if they are in writing, the writing will be filed with clerk. I have instructed the courtroom personnel that any communications you hav outside of my presence must be reported to me, and I will tell the parties and thei alto s about any communication from you that I believe may be of interest to th and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate directly wi m personnel about matters concerning your comfort and safety, such as juror Lion of break areas, how and when to assemble for duty, dress, what personal ite can rought into the courthouse or jury room. + +If you become aware of any vio ese instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me by g n9 to the bailiff. + +# 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS + +The last thing I want to do, before we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +Ouestions/Challenges: This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportunity to get to know a little bit about you, in order to help them comb teir own conclusions about your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide who think should 0 be the jurors in this case. + +Flow we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some genet Cstions of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific questions that k of you. After they have asked all of their questions, I will meet with them an tell me their choices for jurors. Each side can ask that I exclude a person from n a jury if they can give me a reason to believe that he or she might be unable air and impartial. That is what is called a challenge for cause. The lawyers a h a certain number of what are called peremptory by which they may clue eperson from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of elimination, the f rning persons are selected as the jury. It may take more than one conference among t artie their attorneys, and me before the final selections are made. + +Purpos o t e oning: The questions that you will be asked during this process are not intended a s you or unnecessarily pry into your personal affairs, but it is important that the parties an their attorneys know enough about you to make this important decision. If a question is asked that you would prefer not to answer in front of the whole courtroom, just let me know and you can come up here and give your answer just in front of the attorneys and me. If you have a question of either the attorneys or me, don't hesitate to let me know. + +Response to Questioning There are no right or wrong answers to the questions that will be asked of you. The only thing that I ask is that you answer the questions as frankly and + +as honestly and as completely as you can. You will take an oath to answer all questions truthfully and completely and you must do so. Remaining silent when you have information you should disclose is a violation of that oath as well. If a juror violates this oath, it not only may result in having to try the case all over again but also can result in civil a criminal penalties against a juror personally. So, again, it is very important that you s est and complete with your answers as you possibly can. If you don't understan raise your hand and ask for an explanation or clarification. tion, please + +In sum, this is a process to assist the parties and their att to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you are for this purpose ...t V reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror, you must tell us. \ + +### 202.1 INTRODUCTION + +You have now taken an oath to serve as jurors in this trial. Before we begin, I am going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to this case and let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +It is my intention to give you some of the rules of law but it might be th Ail wl'a t know for sure all of the law that will apply in this case until all of the evidence i d. However, I can anticipate most of the law and give it to you at the beginning f the nal so that you will better understand what to be looking for while the evidence p nted. If I later decide that different or additional law applies to the case. I will to any event, at the end of the evidence I will give you the final instructions on w of ust base your verdict. At that time, you will have a complete written set of the i uct so you do not have to memorize what I am about to tell you. + +The following are the rul Taw,kzpected to apply in this case. + +[READ RELEV NSTRUCTIONS BEGINNING AT PG. 28] + +# 202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a chance ake what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is allowed t 'ye his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you are likely o rd hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening state witnesses and evidence to you. e plaintiffs will bring their + +Evidence: Evidence is the information that this case. Evidence includes the testimony o instruct you to consider. ows you to see or hear in deciding es, documents, and anything else that I + +Witnesses: A witness is a attorneys' questions for the ju "giving testimony." Testi oath to tell the t o takes an oath to tell the truth and then answers answering of attorneys' questions by witnesses is called eans statements that are made when someone has sworn an + +The lawyer will normally question the witness first. That is called direct examinatt en the defense lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever the witness has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other evidence may also be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the plaintiffs' witnesses have testified, the defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses on the stand and go through the same process. Then the plaintiffs' lawyer gets to do crossexamination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that you remember that testimony come from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimony and they are not themselves witnesses. + +Objections: Sometimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a question is asked of a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may make w t is called an "objection." The rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are many reason tie tomeys to object. You should simply wait for me to decide how to proceed. If I s objection is "sustained", that means the witness may not answer the question. If say 1 at the objection is "overruled", that means the witness may answer the question. + +When there is an objection and I make a decision, A that I have any particular opinion other than that the nducting a trial are being correctly followed. If I say a question may not be aske or red, you must not try to guess what the answer would have been. That is against es foo. AC ot assume from that decision + +Side Bar Conferences: Som t I need to speak to the attorneys about legal elements of the case that are not appropria e jury to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few of these conferences as po hile you are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if we do have to ha a ch a conference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference at the side of my t we do not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroom. + +Re sses: Breaks in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses". During a recess you still have your duties as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been presented to you, I will instruct you on the law that you must follow. It is important that you remember these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which come next, and later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence to reach your decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the opportunity to make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing arguments, I will instruct you further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you must follow to decide the case. + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury instructions, you will go to t "ury m and discuss and decide the questions I have put on your verdict form. You will c y of the jury instructions to use during your discussions. The discussions you have ecisions you make are usually called "jury deliberations." Your deliberations are a o ly private and neither I nor anyone else will be with you in the jury room. + +Verdict: When you have finished answerin ions, you will give the verdict form to the bailiff, and we will all return to the couylt, here your verdict will be read. When that is completed, you will be released from yoi :sst , ment as a jury. + +Finally, before we beginC t want to give you just a brief explanation of rules you must follow as the case proceeds. \_j + +Keeping an Open You must pay close attention to the testimony and other evidence as it combs o the trial. However, you must avoid forming any final opinion or telling anyone else o son the case until you begin your deliberations. This rule requires you to keep an op mind until you have heard all of the evidence and is designed to prevent you from influencing how your fellow jurors think until they have heard all of the evidence and had an opportunity to form their own opinions. The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and I have instructed you on the law. It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything. + +Consider Only the Evidence: It is the things you hear and see in this courtroom that matter in this trial. The law tells us that a juror can consider only the testimony and other evidence that all the other jurors have also heard and seen in the presence of the judge and the lawyers. Doing anything else is wrong and is against the law. That means that 4 ",u must not do any work or investigation of your own about the case. You must not o 'n o our own any information about the case or about anyone involved in the ca y source whatsoever. This includes reading newspapers, watching televisio phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other me related to this case or the people and places involved i are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. trial or use the internet to look at maps or p g a computer, cell , to get information This applies whether you not visit places mentioned in the 'ee any place discussed during trial. + +Do not provide any information thi case to anyone, including friends or family members. Do not let anyone, incl a osest family members, make comments to you or ask questions about the trial. Jur t not have discussions of any sort with friends or family members about the case or ople and places involved. So, do not let even the closest family members make c communic you must is to you or ask questions about the trial. In this age of electronic to stress again that just as you must not talk about this case face-to-face, about this case by using an electronic device. You must not use phones, tablets, computers or other electronic devices to communicate. Do not send or accept any messages related to this case or your jury service. Do not discuss this case or ask for advice by any means at all, including posting information on an Internet website, chat room or blog. + +No Mid-Trial Discussions: When we are in a recess, do not discuss anything about the trial or the case with each other or with anyone else. If attorneys approach you, don't speak with them. The law says they are to avoid contact with you. If an attorney will not look at you or speak to you, do not be offended or form a conclusion about that behavior. The attorney is not supposed to interact with jurors outside of the courtroom and is only following the rules. The attorney is not being impolite. If an attorney or anyone else does try to speak with you or says something about the case in your presence, please inform the bailiff immediately. + +Only the Jury Decides: Only you get to deliberate and answer the ye • t gt~etions at the end of the trial. I will not intrude into your deliberations at all. I am eg to be neutral. You should not assume that I prefer one decision over another. You ould not try to guess what my opinion is about any part of the case. It would be wrong f< to conclude that anything I say or do means that I am for one side or another in the ussing and deciding the facts is your job alone. + +### 202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS + +If you would like to take notes during the trial, you may do so. On the other hand, of course, you are not required to take notes if you do not want to. That will be left up to you individually. + +You will be provided with a note pad and a pen for use if you wish to take note 46; Any f notes that you take will be for your personal use. However, you should not take them AoRp• t yo rom the courtroom. During recesses, the bailiff will take possession of your notes c, 1 etum them to you when we reconvene. After you have completed your deliberations the b 1 III will deliver your notes to me. They will be destroyed. No one will ever read you + +If you take notes, do not get so involved in note-tak ou become distracted from the proceedings. Your notes should be used only as aid emory. + +Whether or not you take notes, you sh on your memory of the evidence and you should not be unduly influenced by the er jurors. Notes are not entitled to any greater weight than each juror's memory o nce. + +### 202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS + +### Questions for the court or courtroom personnel: + +During the trial, you may have a question about these proceedings. If so, please write it down and hand it to the bailiff, who will then hand it to me. I will review your question with the Aga\*, parties, and their attorneys, before responding. + +## Questions for witnesses: + +CO + +You also may have a question you think should be ask witness. If so, there is a way for you to request that I ask the witness a question. Aft orneys have completed their questioning of the witness, you should raise your h have a question. I will then give you sufficient time to write the question on a piec , fold it, and give it to the bailiff, who will pass it to me. Do not put your name on esti n, show it to anyone or discuss it with anyone. + +I will then review the que t attorneys. Under our law, only certain evidence may be considered by a jury in d ing a verdict. You are bound by the same rules of evidence that control the attorneys' ns. If I decide that the question may not be asked under our rules of evidence, I wil a ou. Otherwise, I will direct the question to the witness. The attorneys may then ask fo uestions if they wish. If there are additional questions from jurors, we will follow th e procedure again. + +By providing this procedure, I do not mean to suggest that you must or should submit written questions for witnesses. In most cases, the lawyers will have asked the necessary questions. + +# 301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED TESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS + +#### a. Deposition or prior testimony: + +Members of the jury, the sworn testimony of (name), given before trial, will now be presented. You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any othey,tvt e in the case. + +# b. Interrogatories: + +Members of the jury, answers to interrogatories will now written questions that have been presented before trial by q under oath. You are to consider and weigh these qu evidence in the case. id to Interrogatories are yl o another. They are answered answers as you would any other + +### c. Stipulated testimony: + +Members of the jury, the pa s 'Sa late' agreed that if (name of witness) were called as a witness, he/she would testify (re cribe the testimony). You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would an evidence in the case. + +#### d. Stipulations: + +Meml a oft jury, the parties have agreed to certain facts. You must accept these facts as true. (R facts). + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded that had a good-faith basis to file all of the civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of LM., E.W., and Jane Doe. By conceding that all of the lawsuits were filed in good-faith, Jeffrey Epstein has not conceded that he in fact committed an of the alleged acts against L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, only that had a good-faith basis to reasonably believe that Jeffrey Epstein had in fact committed the alleged acts. As to whether in fact he committed the alleged acts, Jeffrey Epstein has asserted his .514 Amendment right to remain silent. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XX.XXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 22 of 55 + +e. Admissions: + +#### I. Applicable to all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts.) You must accept these facts as true. (Read the admissions). + +#### 2. Applicable to fewer than all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted ). You must accept these facts as true in deciding the issues between (identify the of ected (thrri (f parties), but these facts should not be used in deciding the issues between (identify t e unaffected parties). (Read the admissions). + +I'S) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 23 of 55 + +#### 301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received in evidence. Witnesses may testify about or refer to this or any other item of evidence during the remainder of the trial. This and all other items received in evidence will be available to you for examination during your deliberations 46.4 + +at the end of the trial. "s y - CO + +#### 301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS + +The (describe item of evidence) has been received in evidence. It is being shown to you now to help you understand the testimony of this witness and other witnesses in the case, as well as the evidence as a whole. You may examine (describe item of evidence) briefly now.4. .;I ill also be + +available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the tri%sy CO + +# 301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS + +### a. Generally: + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. The testimony of the witness is evidence; however, th (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the case ved in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. Only items re it vidence will be available to you for consideration during your deliberations. + +#### b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids bas ed assumptions: + +This witness will be using (identify demons his/her testimony. These items have been p o assist in explaining or illustrating assist this witness in explaining his/her testimony. They may be based on assum you are free to accept or reject. The testimony of the witness is evidence; howev identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the c less received in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. Onl 1Z801s received in evidence will be available to you for consideration t during your delibe + +### **301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE** + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received into evidence. It has been admitted only for the purpose of (describe purpose) as to (name party). You may consider it only for that purpose as it might affect (name party). You may not consider that evidence for any other purpose as to any other party. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 406.1 INTRODUCTION + +Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the evidence in this case. I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that you must use in reaching your verdict. You will recall at the beginning of the case I told you that if, at the end of the case I tided that different law applies, I would tell you so. These instructions are (slightly) di t what I gave you at the beginning and it is these rules of law that you must now . hen I finish telling you about the rules of law, the attorneys will present their fi al arguments and you will then retire to decide your verdict. + +against him. claims that Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause filed and continued to prosecute a lawsuit against Mr. M. That lawsuit alleged tha . Epstein was injured by Mr. M' commission of various criminal acts while p fa ted or exaggerated sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of th t . According to the lawsuit Jeffrey Epstein filed against Mr. M, Mr. the claims solely as part of Mr. M . knowing participation in an illegal Po a with Scott Rothstein. Mr. claims that he was damaged by the false an\ claims that Mr. Epstein filed + +Jeffrey Epstein denies that claim. + +The parties must prove all clai now define some of the terms y eases by the greater weight of the evidence. I will in deciding this case. + +# 406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS + +The claims in this case for your consideration are as follows: + +### **406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE** + +"Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### 406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting the civil proceeding against the facts and circumstances known to Jeffrey Epstein were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the claims made by Jeffrey Epstein against ivle a ksupported by existing facts. 7 + +In order for probable cause to exist on the part of Jeffrey Epstein, th own to Jeffrey Epstein must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the filin of th civil lawsuit. Where, however, it would appear to a cautious man that further inve l is justified before filing the civil lawsuit, then the failure to perform that additional i may form the basis to conclude that such person lacked probable cause to file the \ \* • • ws + +Authority: Liabos v. Harman, 215 So. 4 itict.48 ) -90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) + +# 406.5 LEGAL MALICE + +One acts with legal malice in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to establish what he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey E in maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the c t mplained of, including any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the pr + +4 49 + +2 Durkin v. M., 814 So.2d 1246, 1248 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("As to malice on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff need not allege actual malice; legal malice is sufficient and may be inferred from, among other things, a lack of probable cause, gross negligence, or great indifference to persons, property, or the rights of others. Here, the allegations supporting a lack of probable cause are evidence from which a jury could infer malice.") (emphasis added) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 32 of 55 + +#### **406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING** + +One is regarded as having instituted a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 406.7 LEGAL CAUSE + +# a. Legal cause generally: + +The malicious institution of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury, or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially top cing such loss, injury, or damage, so that it can reasonably be said that, but for the malicio ns on of a proceeding, the loss, injury, or damage would not have occurred. O + +) + +# b. Concurring cause: C + +In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, inj ge the malicious institution of such a proceeding need not be the only cause. The stitution of a proceeding may be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage even t operates in combination with the act of another or some other cause if the malicio n of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or d + +# c. Intervening cause: + +The maliciou nstitiltion of a proceeding may also be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage event h t rates in combination with the act of another, some natural cause, or some other curring after the malicious institution of a proceeding occurs if such other cause was i if reasonably foreseeable and the malicious institution of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage or the resulting loss, injury, or damage was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the malicious institution of a proceeding and the malicious institution of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing it. + +# 406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM + +The issues you must decide on, whether Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and continued a civil proceeding against to M i claim against Jeffrey Epstein are without probable cause either instituted or which later terminated in f or o f and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of loss, inmage Al64\$a o Acz ." + +CO + +### 406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM + +If the greater weight of the evidence does not support should be for Jeffrey Epstein. M I claim, your verdict + +However, if the greater weight of the evidence supports Epstein either: M' claim that Jeffrey + +- Maliciously and without probable cause initiated a civil proceed sst or 0 +- Maliciously and without probable cause continued a civilly ding against or +- Maliciously and without probable ca mitiated and continued a civil proceeding against Ed + +then your verdict should be for d against Jeffrey Epstein. + +1S lEke) + +O + +# 406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compen to for such loss, injury, or damage as the greater weight of the ev\* S ce WS was caused by the institution of the proceeding complained of. + +If you find for damage: M., you shall consider the followi g ale ents of + +# COMPENSATORY DAMAGES + +# 4 C a. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, "Siguish, hurt feelings: + +Any injury to reputation and any sh experienced in the past or to be experie compensation to be awarded on acco just in the light of the evidence. iliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings ture. There is no exact standard for fixing the ements of damage. Any award should be fair and + +# b. Loss of Capacity for the yment of Life. + +Any loss of pact the enjoyment of life experienced in the past or to be experienced in the future. There • no exa standard for measuring such damage. The amount should be fair and just in the light o he idence. + +### c. lost time shown: + +nable value of any time lost in the past in defending against Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit. + +#### AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE + +In order to recover damages for a particular type of loss or harm, must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that such loss or harm was caused by Jeffrey Epstein's wrongful conduct. If roves the occurrence of such loss or harm by the greater weight of the e • nc is entitled to recover for that loss or harm even thou C g ct amount of that loss or harm cannot be determined. + +Thus, if you find by the greater weight of the e e that a particular type of loss or harm did occur as a result of Jeffrey wrongful conduct, is entitled to recover for that loss long as there is some reasonable yardstick by which it can be measure th s, as long as there is some reasonable basis for estimating or approxima mount of the loss or harm. may not be denied damagesc cause the amount of loss or harm is uncertain or difficult to determine. Any ' f uncertainty concerning the computation of damages is instead borne by Jefcr€ ''Epstein. + +(SI Author n v. Pension Services Corp., 389 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Ada evfusd Interstate Dev. Coro., 352 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); John Hanco Lie Ins. Co. v. Mark-A. Inc., 324 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Conner v. Atlas ircraft Corp. 310 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Asarow-Kilgore co. v. Mulford Hickerson Cora., 301 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1974); Saporito v. Bone 195 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hollywood Golf Estates, 324 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. Fla. 1965); McCall v. Sherbill, 68 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1953); Twyman v. Roell, 123 Fla. 2, 166 So. 215 (1936); Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co., 282 U.S. 555, 563 (1931). + +Maslenjak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1918, 1929 (2017) citing Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., 327 U.S. 251, 265 (1946) ("The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require that the wrongdoer shall bear the risk of the uncertainty which his own wrong has created")). + +### **503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES — BIFURCATED PROCEDURE3** + +*a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:* + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for [REDACTED] and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +The trial of the punitive damages issue is divided into two parts. In this first part, you will decide whether the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein is such that punitive damages are warranted. If you decide that punitive damages are warranted, we will proceed to the second part of that issue during which the parties may present additional evidence and argument on the issue of punitive damages. I will then give you additional instructions, after which you will decide whether, in your discretion, punitive damages will be assessed and, if so, the amount. + +*b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:* + +[REDACTED] claims that punitive damages should be awarded against Jeffrey Epstein for his conduct in filing a lawsuit against [REDACTED] Edwards with malice and in the absence of probable cause. Punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convincing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which was a substantial cause of loss, injury, or damage to [REDACTED]. Under those circumstances you may, in your discretion, a [REDACTED] punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convincing evidence does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted against Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Epstein had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and there was a high probability of injury or damage to [REDACTED] and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that Jeffrey Epstein's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" differs from the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it is more compelling and persuasive. As I have already instructed you, "greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +*c. Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure:* + +*c(1). Opening instruction, second stage:* + +Members of the jury, I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to determining whether punitive damages should be assessed and, if so, in what amount. When I finish with these instructions, the parties will present additional evidence. You should consider this additional evidence along with the evidence already presented, and you should decide any disputed factual issues by the greater weight of the evidence. "Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +--- + +3 Instructions 503.1b(1)–b(4) are designed for use in most common-law tort cases. However, certain types of intentional torts may require a punitive damage charge appropriate to the particular tort. See, e.g., First Interstate Development Corp. v. Ablanedo, 511 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1987); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. McCarson, 467 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1985). The same may be true when punitive damages are authorized by statute. See, e.g., Home Insurance Co. v. [REDACTED], 573 So.2d 343, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). + +#### c(2). Punitive damages — determination of amount: + +You are to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensatory damages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consider the following: + +(A). the nature, extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including the following: + +i. wh t f loss, injury, or damage, Jeffrey Epst o • and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstei and pecific act harm + +(B). The financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein. + +However, you may not award an amount that would ly destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +You may in your discretion decline to assess mages. + +#### d. Closing instruction, second stage: + +Members of the jury, you have now damages. Your verdict on the issues raise Epstein must be based on the eviden and on the evidence that has been In reaching your verdict, you are sympathy for or against any party. ived all of the evidence on the issue of punitive tive damages claim of against Jeffrey n received during the trial of the first phase of this case ese proceedings and the law on which I have instructed you. swayed from the performance of your duty by prejudice or + +Your verdict must be tlllll111fous, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. + +You will be S N..a form of verdict, which I shall now read to you: + +When and sign the agreed on your verdict, the or forewoman, acting for the jury, should date ou may now retire to consider your verdict. + +# 601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your answers will be. Your agreed-upon answers to my questions arc called your jury verdict. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of th sees, all exhibits received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to b the parties and any fact of which the court instructs you to accept. + +In reaching your verdict, you must think documents, photographs, or other material that consider any facts that were admitted or what the facts are. You may use reason reasonable inferences from the e covered here. And, you must al 9eigh the testimony and any ceived in evidence. You may also y the lawyers. Your job is to determine omnion sense to reach conclusions. You may draw ut you should not guess about things that were not pply the law as I have explained it to you. + +#### 601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES + +Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; th ntelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the ca the ans and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witness elX the ability of the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testi the reasonableness of the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of all idence in the case and in the light of your own experience and commons sense. + +You have heard opinion testimony on ce subjects from persons referred to as expert witnesses. + +You may accept such opinion t ect it, or give it the weight you think it deserves, considering the knowledge, skill, training, or education of the witness, the reasons given by the witness for the opinion d, and all the other evidence in the case. + +## ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION — FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit when a person, based upon the Fifth Amendment, refuses to answer questions and evidence is offered against him which is relevant to the case. + +Therefore, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein refused to answer questions when confronted with relevant evidence against him on the ground that his answers [REDACTED] y tend to incriminate him, then you may, but are not required to, infer that his answers would have incriminated him. You may consider this, together with the other evidence, in determining the issues of this case, but a Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein cannot rest solely on the adverse inference. + +Authority: Fla. St. Jury Ins. 301.11a; *Baxter v. Palmigiano*, 425 U.S. 308 (1976); *Coquina Investments v. Rothstein*, No. 10-60786-cv-2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) + +NOT A CERTIFICATE + +### FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404 + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestation, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +As a consequence of these provisions in both federal and state 1 'per pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epst ' t limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Jeffrey etJein against the three clients represented by . The law express Mr. to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexual a o ild molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +#### NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded and does not dispute that he filed the Complaint at issue against LM, Scott Rothstein, and prosecute claims against 16, 2012. on December 7, 2009, and he continued to until he voluntarily dismissed those claims 4n August + +In determining what Jeffrey Epstein's intention was at the time h 'S I prosecuted claims against the law presumes that he intended hen tural and probable consequences of his acts. Accordingly, if you find that Jeffrey filed and prosecuted false claims against then he is presumed to d to file and prosecute false claims, unless that presumption is rebutted by other + +Litigation Privilege4 + +The law does not allow a separate lawsuit to be based on conduct that occurs in and is related to another legal proceeding. That protection, called the "litigation privilege" does not prevent the application of other remedies such as contempt of court proceedings, the filing of professional grievances, or prosecution for perjury, but lawsuits for damages are not allowed. + +In his lawsuit against [REDACTED], Jeffrey Epstein alleged that Bradley [REDACTED] engaged in discovery in the cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, including the noticing of certain depositions, that was improper and caused Jeffrey Epstein to spend money on attorney's fees to defend against that discovery. Jeffrey Epstein claims that these monies constitute damages that are recoverable in his independent lawsuit against [REDACTED]. + +However, if the investigation [REDACTED] Edwards engaged in was reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence regarding any part of the claims being pursued by L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, including but not limited to their potential claims for punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein, then the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was relevant to those proceedings and is protected by absolute immunity. + +Thus, if you find that the discovery being taken by [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was relevant to the potential claims being pursued by his three clients, then you must also find that Jeffrey Epstein could not properly pursue an independent lawsuit against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to recover any claimed damages for attorney's fees, as those claims were absolutely barred by Florida's litigation privilege. + +4 Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, [REDACTED] & Frappier v. [REDACTED], 950 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla. 2007) ("In Myers v. Hodges, 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357 (1907), this Court recognized the principle of the litigation privilege in Florida, essentially providing legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings. In that case, involving a libel suit based on statements contained in a complaint, this Court established a qualified litigation privilege, requiring that the alleged defamatory statements be relevant to the judicial proceeding. . . . Under our holding, once this threshold showing was met, the statements were entitled to immunity."). + +# Jeffrey Epstein's Failure to Testify at Trials + +The failure of Jeffrey Epstein to appear or testify as to material fa knowledge creates an inference that he refrained from appe because the truth, if revealed, would not be favorable to hic ) is) stifying + +5 2;S Geiaer v. Mather of Lakeland. Inc. 217 So. 2d 897, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968) ("It is a general rule that the failure of a party to appear or testify as to material facts within his knowledge creates an inference that he refrained from appearing or testifying because the truth, if made to appear, would not aid his contention .. . This appears to be the clear weight of authority throughout the country."). + +#### The Sword-Shield Doctrine6 + +Under Florida law, Jeffrey Epstein is not permitted to file a civil proceeding Aa S st and then invoke a privilege to avoid discovery on the clam by Jeffrey Epstein against in that civil proceeds + +An issue you are deciding in this case is whether .1 stein initiated and continued claims against in the t e probable cause. If you find that Jeffrey Epstein was asked to provi\ ton about whatever probable cause he may have had, and rather than vid hat information he instead refused to answer relevant questions, t permitted, but are not required, to infer that Jeffrey Epstein's ans have been adverse to his position and would have demonstrated a lack o ble cause. + +6 See DePalma v. DePalma, 538 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) ("It is well settled in this district that a person may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the fifth amendment to avoid giving discovery, using the fifth amendment as both a 'sword and a shield.'"). + +#### Epstein's Failure to Raise Advice of Counsel as a Defense + +Jeffrey Epstein had the option in this case of claiming that, after he provided his attorney with a full and complete disclosure of all the facts known to Jeffrey Epst in, his attorney advised him to institute the civil proceeding against 1O This defense, called "advice of counsel," would have been a comp malicious prosecution action. e to + +Jeffrey Epstein, however, chose not to raise this de ACV) led to call any of his attorneys as a witness in support of his de fadley malicious prosecution claim. The failure of Je to present testimony of his own attorneys who are within his con d w may have knowledge of facts at issue justifies an adverse inferen ffrey Epstein. + +You therefore may, not required to, infer that Jeffrey Epstein failed to call his attorney cause his attorneys' testimony would have been unfavorable to 's claim that Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to initiate the civil ng against + +7 ,sPaulk v. Buezynski, 106 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958) ("As mentioned above, defendant alleged that the perjury prosecution against plaintiff was instituted upon advice of counsel. Such is a complete defense to an action for malicious prosecution; however, such advice of counsel must be based upon a Ml and complete disclosure of all the facts."). Tri-State Systems. Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 500 So. 2d 212, 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ("Mhe failure of a party to present the testimony of a person within his control who has knowledge of the fact at issue justifies an inference adverse to that party.")- see also Haliburton v. State, 561 So. 2d 248, 250 (Fla. 1990); McLaughlin v, Union-Leader Corp., 99 N.H. 492, 498 (N.H. 1955) (affirming trial court's ruling permitting counsel to comment on the opposing party's failure to call its attorney in defense of the claims). + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA04080(DOCXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 49 of 55 + +### 601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT) + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attorneys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +SSA + +# SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have a fe last instructions for you. + +During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case o S6ne another and only when all jurors are present in the jury room. You will have in tl py room all of the evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching yo n, do not do any research on your own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, t , or any other reference materials. Do not investigate the case or condu nments. Do not visit or view the scene of any event involved in this case or aps or pictures on the Internet. If you happen to pass by the scene, do not estigate. All jurors must see or hear the same evidence at the same time. Do t re sten to, or watch any news accounts of this trial. + +You are not to co t unicate er with any person outside the jury about this case. Until you have reached a vend' , you ust not talk about this case in person or through the telephone, writing, or e • co2ltmunication, such as a blog, twitter, e-mail, text message, or any other means. act anyone to assist you, such as a family accountant, doctor, or lawyer. These co nications rules apply until I discharge you at the end of the case. + +If you become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by giving a note to the bailiff. + +Any notes you have taken during the trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes are simply an aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are binding or conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own + +memory or that of other jurors. Instead, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the conclusion of the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. No one will ever read your notes. + +In reaching your verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public opi A\iz • n, ny other sentiment for or against any party to influence your decision. Your on the evidence that has been received and the law on which I have i (str ucte you. est be based + +, \_ ) Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot p ici to in that decision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdic from something I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer on ver another. Therefore, in 44k, reaching your verdict, you should not consi~d anAing that I have said or done, except for my specific instructions to you. c) + +Pay careful attention to alLt ns ctions that I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a c I my instructions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the instr s are important, and you must consider all of them together. There are no oth s that apply to this case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must a in reaching your decision in this case. + +you go to the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as a foreperson during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussions are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have considered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if you are convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not give up your + +honest beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that you and your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case. I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answer. I have already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You must follow my instructions and the form carefully. ou must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions in the order the pea After you answer a question, the form tells you what to do next. I will now form of verdict) to you: (read + +You will be given (state number) forms of verdict, w form of verdict) all now read to you: (read + +verdict) M , your ve dicc, If you find for in the following form: (read form of + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, of verdict) (v Se \i'et will be in the following form: (read form + +'S ) Your verdict must be u it us, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. When you have agre our verdict and finished filling out the form, your foreperson must write the datfe sign it at the bottom and return the verdict to the bailiff. + +If need to communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it to the In your note, do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. You may now retire to decide your verdict. + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 53 of 55 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +CO SA + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +- (1) Did Jeffrey Epstein initiate or SI a civil claim against maliciously and without probabl + +Yes + +#### VERDICT FO + +If your answer is 'No' do no dress question (2) below If however, your answer is 'Yes', please proceed to que n )-(5). + +- (2) What amount of damage, if any, sustained by to his reputation an, e, humiliation, mental anguish and hurt feelings, as a consequence of doing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +- (3) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by for loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +- (4) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by for lost time in the past, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form + +Page 54 of 55 + +\$ \_\_\_\_\_ + +(5) Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that punitive damages are warranted against **Jeffrey Epstein**? + +Yes \_\_\_\_\_ + +No \_\_\_\_\_ + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XYMMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 55 of 55 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +#### VERDICT FO + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +Go + +- (1) What is the total amount of p ges, if any, which you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, should assped against Jeffrey Epstein? + +If you elect not to assess pu ive damages against Jeffrey Epstein, you should enter a zero (0) as the amount of damages, and sign and da verdict fonn. + +[If you have elect remaining ques damages agai of to dssess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein then you should skip the ign and date the verdict form. If, however, you have elected to assess punitive y Epstein, then you should answer the following questions:] + +At e time of loss, injury, or damage to did Jeffrey intent to harm Bradley and did the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein in fact harm + +Yes No \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4ff6d27735d693424f10484f79b5e23b518559d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805/EFTA02765805.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3549 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765805.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 55, + "chars": 71609, + "elapsed_seconds": 20.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.8594970703125, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.8594970703125, + 104.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 104.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S Al 6.D PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.548, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 492.7967834472656, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 492.7967834472656, + 360.6870422363281 + ], + [ + 109.548, + 360.6870422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 257.03999999999996, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.512, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 405.75600000000003, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 199.512, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 287.64, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 287.64, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.01849365234375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 457.01849365234375, + 110.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 110.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 388.330810546875, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 388.330810546875, + 110.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 110.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 207.23280334472656, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 207.23280334472656, + 124.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 124.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 389.8988952636719, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 389.8988952636719, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 277.47381591796875, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 277.47381591796875, + 124.863037109375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 124.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.4235382080078, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.4235382080078, + 123.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 123.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for the court or courtroom personnel:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 313.831787109375, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 313.831787109375, + 150.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 150.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 193.77279663085938, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 193.77279663085938, + 288.8035583496094 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 288.8035583496094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED \nTESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.5464477539062, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.5464477539062, + 138.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 138.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 245.16021728515625, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 245.16021728515625, + 176.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 176.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 179.59230041503906, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 179.59230041503906, + 283.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 283.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.2, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 199.79666137695312, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 199.79666137695312, + 421.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 61.2, + 421.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Stipulations:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 531.4335327148438 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 531.4335327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Applicable to all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 123.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 254.3194122314453, + 123.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 254.3194122314453, + 137.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 137.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Applicable to fewer than all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.23001098632812, + 203.14501953125 + ], + [ + 295.39654541015625, + 203.14501953125 + ], + [ + 295.39654541015625, + 217.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 98.23001098632812, + 217.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC \nOR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.6981811523438, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.6981811523438, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.0864868164062, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 533.0864868164062, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.41424560546875, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.41424560546875, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 149.5703582763672, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 149.5703582763672, + 152.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 152.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids bas \ned assumptions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 479.1605224609375, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 479.1605224609375, + 345.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 345.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 123.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 211.5671844482422, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 211.5671844482422, + 123.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 123.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 254.0473175048828, + 110.97 + ], + [ + 254.0473175048828, + 126.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 126.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 108.53999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 227.02215576171875, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 227.02215576171875, + 124.863037109375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 124.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.5 LEGAL MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 213.24691772460938, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 213.24691772460938, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 407.592, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 407.592, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.7 LEGAL CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 197.01556396484375, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 197.01556396484375, + 124.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 124.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 215.7864532470703, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 215.7864532470703, + 151.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 151.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Concurring cause: C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 411.7974853515625, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 411.7974853515625, + 301.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 301.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 192.5183868408203, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 192.5183868408203, + 478.6125183105469 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 478.6125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 224.12051391601562, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 224.12051391601562, + 123.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 123.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 303.6771545410156, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 303.6771545410156, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 368.82611083984375, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 368.82611083984375, + 124.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 124.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPENSATORY DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 271.68798828125, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 271.68798828125, + 342.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 342.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 C\na. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, \"Siguish, hurt feelings:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 359.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 443.7271728515625, + 359.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 443.7271728515625, + 392.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 392.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Loss of Capacity for the yment of Life.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 470.4375 + ], + [ + 318.3883056640625, + 470.4375 + ], + [ + 318.3883056640625, + 485.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 485.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. lost time shown:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 545.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 249.72840881347656, + 545.0675048828125 + ], + [ + 249.72840881347656, + 560.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 560.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO \nDETERMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 486.326171875, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 486.326171875, + 123.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 123.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES \u2014 BIFURCATED PROCEDURE 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 381.276, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 131.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 291.6 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 549.99 + ], + [ + 321.91200000000003, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 562.14 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(1). Opening instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 584.01 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 584.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(2). Punitive damages \u2014 determination of amount:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 319.7907409667969, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 319.7907409667969, + 108.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 108.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Closing instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 379.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 237.92489624023438, + 379.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 237.92489624023438, + 393.0635681152344 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 393.0635681152344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 284.9111328125, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 284.9111328125, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 315.6022033691406, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 315.6022033691406, + 124.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 124.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION \u2014 FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 452.88, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 121.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 536.177490234375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 536.177490234375, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.4510498046875, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.4510498046875, + 123.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 123.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Litigation Privilege 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 134.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein's Failure to Testify at Trials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 223.214111328125 + ], + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 223.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Sword-Shield Doctrine6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 366.5735168457031, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 366.5735168457031, + 184.9541015625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 184.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Failure to Raise Advice of Counsel as a Defense", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 420.5688171386719, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 420.5688171386719, + 147.4541015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 147.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 475.78192138671875, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 475.78192138671875, + 134.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 134.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 329.0740661621094, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 329.0740661621094, + 124.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 124.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.781005859375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.781005859375, + 134.18701171875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 134.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 321.9375 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 321.9375 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 336.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 336.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.953125, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.953125, + 134.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 134.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 336.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 336.6035461425781 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765805" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ac9d5acd74ae8c9eaf79b1d1dc2104add4a76e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg) + +## Fourth District Court of Appeal 110 South Tamarind Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 242-2000 + +## ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE + +DATE: March 12, 2018 + +STYLE: JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and individually + +4DCA#: 18-0787 + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal has received the Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflecting a filing date of March 12, 2018. + +The county of origin is Palm Beach. + +The lower tribunal case number provided is 502009CA040800XXXMB. + +Fee Status: Due + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal's case number must be utilized on all pleadings and correspondence filed in this cause. Moreover, ALL PLEADINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ATTORNEY'S FLORIDA BAR NUMBER and a physical address. cre, + +ELECTRONIC FAIN&IS MANDATORY FOR ALL ATTORNEYS. Please visit edca.4d 'crg to register for eDCA, the court's electronic filing system. A N. + +ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE NOT REGISTERED FOR eDCA WILL NOT RECEIVE FURTHER PAPER DOCUMENTS FROM THE COURT + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach Scott J. Link Nichole J. Segal Clerk Palm Beach + +John Scarola Marc S. Nurik Karen Elizabeth Terry Jack Alan Goldber er Rachel Glasser J. Hon. Donald W. Hafele \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81cb2514146d5544104845ba886d7325d08eca95 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/EFTA02765860.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1179, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.89, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal \n110 South Tamarind Avenue \nWest Palm Beach, Florida 33401 \n(561) 242-2000", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.13999999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 397.2012939453125, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 397.2012939453125, + 204.4490966796875 + ], + [ + 211.13999999999996, + 204.4490966796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 425.3157958984375, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 425.3157958984375, + 231.37738037109375 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 231.37738037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765860" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54ecbfa7948fd4e60d4bfb750faad35e2e8331d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765860/_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b101e10f710bf9e70c39e9f0a90904273d0f239f3d42828c0b0676ad53abd34b +size 11986 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c96448dbe80f58307d796592b83ac5937f3dbe3d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 12, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0787 + +L.T. No.: 502009CA040800XXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROT T • ividually and J. , individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +Appellee / + +Res"ndent(s)N\* + +The \$300.00 filing fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with sections 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, dig not accompany the petition as required in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1001. The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PETITION IS SUBSEQUENTLY VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED OR ADVERSELY DISMISSED. + +ORDERED sua sponte that the \$300.00 filing fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with section 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, must be filed in this Court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the petition has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the petition is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. + +"NOTE: No extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until this filing fee is paid or until an affidavit of indigerin filed and indigency status is granted. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach Scott J. Link Nichole J. Segal Clerk Palm Beach + +kw + +John Scarola Marc S. Nurik Karen Elizabeth Terry Jack Alan Goldber er Rachel Glasser J. Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +*Lonn Weissblum* + +**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +**Fourth District Court of Appeal** + +![](_page_1_Picture_20.jpeg) + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a802a9b6f75c6459148d858f0da6c8f5a600b07a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/EFTA02765861.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2039, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.11, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_20.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.97999572753906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.784, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.784, + 100.4320068359375 + ], + [ + 73.97999572753906, + 100.4320068359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.15599999999999, + 260.01 + ], + [ + 224.604, + 260.01 + ], + [ + 224.604, + 275.56201171875 + ], + [ + 69.15599999999999, + 275.56201171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765861" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/_page_1_Picture_20.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/_page_1_Picture_20.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad78798fcaba44058583630a831b54421bb60467 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765861/_page_1_Picture_20.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c59840b3722eb489d21a0816c484579e50209902faea29496fc3f66db8301751 +size 19350 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765863/EFTA02765863.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765863/EFTA02765863.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e54865b980d1df67001a9e9180a98c2bbc140769 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765863/EFTA02765863.md @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +55 + +C + +S .14- "\' + +4c ) + +## MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARD[ ;4 il@ ENGES FOR CAUSE + +J. by and through Memorandum of Law Regarding Challen "gned counsel, respectfully submits this + +### I. JUROR'S BIAS. PR AND IMPARTIALITY: CLOSE CASES AND REASONABLE DO TRIKE FOR CAUSE + +1. "If it appears tha r does not stand indifferent to the action...another shall be called in that juror's plat, rida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.431(c)(1) (under "Challenge For Cause" su + +2. e or should be excused for cause if there is a reasonable doubt as to the juror's ability to rend 'al verdict. M v. State, 396 So.2d 203 (Fla. 3nd DCA 1981); Franqui v. State, 804 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2001); Overton v. State, 801 So.2d 877 (Ha. 2001); Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 2000). + +3. In Auriemme v. State, 501 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5°' DCA 1986) the 5th DCA summarized the law as follows: + +"[2] Turning to the merits of the case, *Auriemme* contends that it was error to deny his two challenges for cause, thereby forcing the exhaustion of his peremptory challenges. We agree, based on the applicable test found in [REDACTED] v. State, 477 So.2d 553, 555-56 (Fla. 1985); + +This Court recently stated: "The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him by the court." Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038, 1041 (Fla.), *cert. denied*, [469] U.S. (873), 105 S.Ct. 229, 83 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984). In applying this test, the trial courts must utilize the following rule, set forth in Singer v. State, 109 So.2d (Fla. 1959): + +[I]f there is a basis for any *reasonable doubt as to any juror's possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial*, [.] he should be excused on motion of a party, or by [the] court on its own motion. Id at 24. In [REDACTED], we reaffirmed the proposition that the "statement of a juror that he can readily render a verdict according to the evidence, notwithstanding an opinion entertained, will not alone render him competent if it otherwise appears that his formed opinion is of such a fixed and settled nature as not readily to yield to the evidence." Id at 22 (quoting Olive v. State, 34 Fla. 203, 206, 15 So. 925, 926 (1894)). In other early cases this Court stated that "jurors should if possible be not only impartial, but beyond even the suspicion of partiality," [REDACTED] v. State, 9 Fla. 215, 222 (1860), and that "[i]f there is a doubt as to the juror's sense of fairness or his mental integrity, he should be excused." [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED], 97 Fla. 591, 598, 121 So. 793, 796 (1929)." + +4. A juror should be excused for cause if there is a doubt as to juror's sense of fairness or mental integrity. [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED], 97 Fla. 591, 121 So. 793 (1929); City of Live Oak v. Townsend, 567 So.2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). + +5. Jurors should be beyond even a suspicion of partiality. [REDACTED] v. State, 9 Fla. 215 + +juror should be excused. 6. In Ortiz v. State, 543 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3"I DCA 1989), the court stated the test for determining the competence of a juror is not whether a juror can "control" any bias udice, but rather whether he may "lay aside" those considerations. Where there is row re\* Ai ble doubt the 0 + +(Fla. 1860). + +7. If a juror makes a statement sufficient to cause doubt as CA• er ability to render an impartial verdict, the fact that trial judge or opposing counse co mmitment that juror will be fair or try to be fair, doesn't affect the need to excuse or cause. Price v. State, 538 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989); . v. State, supra- S. v. and Coast Line Rai 487 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 1" DCA 1986), supra; Lon s nrath Chevrolet 527 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). See also F: 1 • v. i of each 608 So.2d 927, 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. denied, 620 So.2d 760 (Fla. 19 in h the court stated that "Whe jurors subsequent change in their answers, arrived at a further questioning by appellee's counsel, must be viewed with some skeptic[ ; the ce of a prospective juror that the juror can decide the case on the facts and the 1 of etenninative on the issue of a challenge for cause." + +uror is not impartial when one side must overcome a preconceived opinion of juror in order to revail." . v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1985); James v. State, 736 So.2d 1260 (Ha. 411DCA 1999). + +9. A juror should not serve if he or she is not indifferent to the action and should be excused for cause if there is a reasonable doubt as to the juror's ability to render an impartial verdict, and if it is a close call, the juror should be excused. Somerville v. Ahuja. M.D., 902 So.2d 930 (Fla + +5th DCA 2005). + +10. "Because impartiality of the finders of fact is an absolute prerequisite to our system of justice, we have adhered to the proposition that close cases involving ges to the eS impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the j r er than leaving doubt as to impartiality." v. State, 638 Sold 976 (Fla. 4th DC + +12. In Sydleman v. Benson,463 So.2d 533 (Fla. 4 19 court cautioned that: + +"...the impartially of the finders of fact is an a our system of justice. Close cases should excusing juror rather than leaving impartiality." uisite to d in favor of to his or her + +13. Statements that establish grooms + +- a. Will you have ulty in setting those negative feelings asid + +Pa 758 So.2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); + +te, 736 Sold 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). + +- b. i you feel that my client is not starting out with a clean O s ate? + +Overton v. State, 801. So.2d 877, 894 (Fla. 2001). + +- c. Do you feel my client is not starting out on an even playing field? + +Nash v. General Motors Corporation. 734 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1999). + +- d. Is my client starting out with a strike or half a strike against him? + +Club West. Inc. v. Tropigas of Florida. Inc., 514 So.2d 426, 427, 428 (Fla. 3`" DCA 1987); + +Jaffe v. Applebaum 830 So.2d 136 (Ha. 4th DCA 2002). + +- e. Is there a burden in your mind that my client has to overcome? + +Goldenberg v. Regional Import and Export Trucking 674 So.2d 761, 762, 763 (Ha. 4dIDCA 1996). + +14. Cumulative effect of comments require striking they raise a reasonable doubt as to ability to be impartial. James v. State, 731 Sold 3'd DCA 1999). + +15. Juror should have been excused for juror expressed distaste for lawyers, suggested that he would hold the plaintiff to a " obvious" standard of proof, and indicated that plaintiffs in general were "looking fo y m y" and "trying to cheat the system" to "make an easy buck." The juror also agreed p tiff would have to overcome a "resistance" on his part if he served as a juror. Frazier v 13 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 46 DCA 2005). + +16. If there is s for a reasonable doubt as to whether a juror possesses that state of mind which will e him o render an impartial verdict solely on the evidence submitted and the law announ 1, he should be excused for cause. Ferias v. State, 540 Sold 201 (Fla.. 3'd DCA 1989). + +17. Allowable areas of inquiry in reported cases include matters affecting a prospective juror's personal life including: + +- a. Whether he feels that verdicts will raise his insurance premiums. + +v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises. Inc., 403 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 1981). + +- b. Whether or not he has formed or expressed an opinion on issues involved in a case based on newspaper articles and hearsay. + +v. State, supra. + +- c. Whether or not they have negative attitude toward the legal system due to previous unfavorable expert lawsuits filed against them, or members of their CAf • + +Levy v. Hawk's Cali. Inc., 543 So.2.d 1299 (Fla.. 3 1989). + +- d. Whether or not they could consider and apply instruction of the court of what they have read or h nfluence + +v. State, 463 So.2d thDCA 1985). + +18. Where the prospective r i fates between assertions of partiality and impartiality, a reasonable doubt has k4 which would require that the juror be excused. Plain v. State, 453 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1 + +19. Statemen !v h as "I am a fair person" and "'think I could be fair" are not sufficient to set aside impart' (Fla. 3rd DCA ted by other responses. Nash v. General Motors Corp.. 734 So.2d 437 + +was reversible error for the trial court not to have excused for cause a juror who gave equivocal answers about her husband's career and whether or not it would affect her ability to be impartial, whether she would favor the State, what weight she would give to police testimony and where there was an indication she misunderstood the burden of proof. Jefferson v. State,489 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3nd DCA 1986). + +21. One of the most important principles governing challenges for cause recognizes that + +a juror is not impartial when one side must overcome preconceived opinion in order to prevail. Price v. State 538 So.2d 486 (Fla. r DCA 1989). + +22. Trotter v. State. 576 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1990) sets out the procedural t rements for preserving a for-cause error ("Under Florida law, It]o show reversible error, a must show that all peremptories had been exhausted and that an objectionable juro accepted.' By this we mean the following. Where a defendant seeks reversal based on a that he was wrongfully forced to exhaust his peremptory challenges, he initially fy a specific juror whom he otherwise would have struck peremptorily. This juror individual who actually sat on the jury and whom the defendant either challenged or attempted to challenge peremptorily or otherwise objected to after his peremptory c le been exhausted.) (Internal citations omitted) + +# IL VACILLATION BY JU C(fr, + +I. A juror should ex d for cause when he or she has expressed reservations about either his/her pre-co ived opinions or his/her ability to be impartial even though the juror later attests that he or sh uld "fair." Graham v. State, 470 So.2d 97 (Fla. I" DCA 1985). 'T it. + +2. ror hould be excused who stated that she would not feel uncomfortable in telling r or employer that she has rendered a big verdict against her daughter's employer after previ ly indicating some misgivings about her ability to be fair. Longshore v. Fronrath Chevrolet. Inc. 527 So.2d 922 at 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). + +3. In short, once the juror has expressed misgivings, rehabilitation is not possible as one side must overcome a preconceived opinion of that juror in order to prevail.. v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1985). + +4. Where a juror initially demonstrates predilection in a case in which in the juror's mind would prevent him or her from impartially reaching a verdict, a subsequent change in that opinion, arrived at after farther questioning by the parties' attorneys or judge, is properly vi skepticism. Club West v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc. 514 So.2d 426, 427 (Fl with some A 1987). + +5. The fact that the trial judge extracts a commitment fro "will try to be fair" or even "will be fair" does not eliminate the challenge. v. State,supra; Sikes v. Seaboard supra-DCA 1987). tive juror that he or the grounds for the tate 506 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 5th + +6. A trial court's structured questio be fair and impartial, after declaring that he have been struck for cause. traw v. 1999). aused the juror to respond that he could d not qualify to rehabilitate the juror. He should Doctors Health and Life, 728 So.2d 354 (Ha. 5th DCA + +7. Answers strial court's leading questions should not be the sole factor for rehabilitating a pot oat ji . Hagerman v. State, 613 So.2d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). + +al juror's response to questions by the court or counsel in an effort to rehabi I i after having admitted to harboring some bias or prejudice, that they can set aside those prior admitted feelings is not determinative of whether the juror should be excused for cause, insofar as she responded that she did not "think" or "believe" that her bias would influence her, which responses indicated she was not absolutely sure her bias would not affect her verdict. A juror in a medical malpractice case against a cardiologist should have been excused after he stated that his bias 'probably would" have an effect on his ability to render an impartial verdict and that he was + +because plaintiff was a. Ismokern, she would have been struck for cause). Somerville v. Abuja. 902 "thinking" (if juror had not clarified answer that he would have held cardiologist to a lesser standard So.2d 930, 935 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). + +A 9. While the Supreme Court recently explained that Florid: eSa allows for the rehabilitation of jurors, any such rehabilitation is limited to a prospectiv ack of familiarity with or misinformation concerning the law." Matarranz v. tate 01 5355117 at \*10 (Fla. Sept. 26, 2013). Attempts to rehabilitate a juror with perso ble opinions and attitudes, ... and firmly held beliefs" suggesting bias or prejudice hibited. Id Only "[c]oncems that stem from misinformation and confusion concej aw or process" are available for "redress through rehabilitation." Id + +### III. VOIR DIRE INOUIRri a4RDING LAW OR DEFENSES: LA VADO v. STAT + +Counsel has the to make an inquiry about a prospective juror's "feelings" about points of law or defer Tpecific to the case, Lavado v. State, 492 So.2d 1322 (Ha. 1986), or whether the juror tangs concerning issues arising in a case. v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1959); Hill ae 77 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1985). + +## do v, State: The law on voir dire inquiry regarding defenses + +In Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917 (Ha. 3rd DCA 1985), the district court ruled that the trial court's refusal to permit prospective jurors to be questioned on voir dire as to their ability to entertain a defense of voluntary intoxication was not an abuse of discretion where the trial court gave appropriate instnictions on voluntary intoxication, and there was no showing that the jury, having + +been sworn to follow those instructions, failed to do so. In a vigorous dissent, *Judge Pearson* asserted that the district court's ruling was "as wrong as it would have been had it approved a ruling which denied counsel the right to question prospective jurors altogether." + +If he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication. Despite this, the majority approves a ruling which precluded counsel from asking the prospective jurors about their bias or prejudice against this defense." Lavado, 469 So.2d at 91 + +***The Supreme Court agreed with Judge Pearson and reversed the district court*** with the observation that "We can add nothing to Judge Pearson's comprehensive, articulate and logical dissenting opinion, and therefore adopt it in its entirety as our majority opinion." Lavado v. State, 492 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1986) + +- • Lavado v. State — 492 So.2d 1322 [Supreme Court of Florida] "The trial judge refused to permit the inquiry, permitting only a general question regarding a prospective juror's ability to follow the court's instructions. We can add nothing to Judge Pearson's comprehensive, articulate, and logical dissenting opinion, and therefore adopt it in its entirety as our majority opinion." +- • Lavado v. State — 469 So.2d 917 (Fla. 3rd DCA). "A meaningful voir dire must include questions about the juror's attitudes towards the defense." +- • The Florida Supreme Court in Lavado v. State, 492 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1986), adopted the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Rosales-[REDACTED] v. United States, 451 U.S. 182, 101 S.Ct. 1629, 68 L. ED.2d 22 (1981), which discussed the elements of a "meaningful voir dire": + +"What is meaningful voir dire which will satisfy the constitutional imperative of a fair and impartial jury depends on the issues in the case to be tried. The scope of voir dire, therefore, 'should be so varied and elaborated as the circumstances surrounding the juror under examination in relation to the case on trial w seem to require...' Thus, where a juror's attitude particular legal doctrine (in the words of the "the law") is essential to a determinatio er challenges for cause or peremptory ch are to be made, it is well settled that the e voir dire properly includes question he references to that legal doctrine even the form of hypothetical questions." + +2. Trial court may not preclude a \Ifro inquiry during voir dire into bias bearing on a matter that is at the heart of the ;10 S nd case. larassia v. State, 902 So.2d 357 (Fla. 4111DCA 2005). + +3. Hypothetical quil l rmitted: provided they make a correct reference to the law that aid in determining whet lenges for cause or preemptory challenges are proper. Moore v. State, 939 So.2d 1116 A 2006). + +### IV. I RYABOUT THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND FEELINGS ABOUT AGES IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES + +blems with the Legal System: Levy v. Hawks Cay. Inc., 543 So.2d 1299 (Fla. rd DCA 19\$9), stands for the proposition that when a negative attitude exists in a juror toward the legal system, due to previous experiences with lawsuits, the trial court's failure to challenge jurors for cause was reversible error: + +> "When any reasonable doubt exists as to whether a juror possesses state of mind necessary to render an impartial verdict based solely + +on evidence submitted and law announced at trial, he should be excused." + +2. Personal Injury and Lawsuit and Damages: In Sisto v. Aetna Casualty & Surety, Co., 689 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) the court stated: + +"Without the opportunity to ask even a threshold question on the subject, counsel for plaintiffs was unable to explore whether any given juror possessed a strong preconceived feeling or bias concerning personal injury lawsuits and the award of non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. If inquiry had been permitted and a prospective juror had expressed a definite *bias against awarding intangible damages, plaintiffs would have had a basis for requesting that the prospective juror be excused for cause, depending on the exact questions asked and answers given. See Goldenberg v. Regional Import & Export Trucking Co., 674 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); cf. Fazzolari v. City of West Palm Beach, 608 So.2d 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 620 So.2d 760 (Fla 1993). At the very least, plaintiffs would have had the opportunity to explore the depth of the bias or the basis for the attitude in order to make a determination whether to exercise a peremptory or for cause challenge. See Skiles v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 267 So.2d 379 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1972), *cert. denied*, 275 So.2d 253 (Fla. 1973)...* + +In recent years, the subject of non-economic damages has received widespread media attention. It is a subject on which an individual may possess a strong bias or prejudice. In a personal injury case where the issues of permanent injury and past and future noneconomic damages are hotly contested, allowing counsel to inquire about an individual's views on the sensitive area of non-economic damages is essential to a party's right to conduct a reasonable examination. Our court has implicitly recognized that a prospective juror's attitude about personal injury lawsuits is an appropriate subject for inquiry. See Fazzolari, 608 So.2d at 927-28. + +Both liability and damages were hotly contested in this personal injury case. It is ironic that while the trial court admonished the parties to limit their questions to those that would touch on the prospective jurors' ability to be fair and impartial, it then prevented questions that + +would have assisted both the trial court and the parties in making this determination." + +## V. TIME ALLOWED TO CONDUCT VOIR DIRE + +The Court should not impose arbitrary time constraints on the P ift's oir dire 0 examination of the venire, as set forth below: + +- 1. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.431(b) provides, in that t e rights of the parties to conduct a reasonable examination of each juror orally shall rved. +- 2. Although a trial judge has considerable di etermining the extent of counsel's examination of prospective jurors See M the court may not impose arbitrary time limit S vo re. See v. 1141 (FIa. 46DCA 2005), State, 785 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3"I DCA 2001). +- 3. In fact, a court ab conduct a meaningful your dire. at 1142; O'Hara v. State. 642 So.2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). +- 4. Fl urts have held that it is an abuse of discretion for a trial court to impose on a party Ct e minute time limits on questioning each prospective juror. Gosha v. State 534 So.2d 912 la. 3fli DCA 1988). +- 5. The fact that a trial judge conducts an examination of jurors before turning the questioning over to counsel does not in and of itself justify arbitrary time limitation on counsel's voir dire. Carver v. Niedermaver 920 So.2d 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). +- 6. The purpose of voir dire is to obtain a "fair and impartial jury to try the issues in retion when it unreasonably limits counsel's ability to \z\* + +the cause." The time restrictions or limits on numbers of questions can result in the loss of this fundamental right. v. State, 424 So.2d 148 (Fla. 5'h DCA 1982). + +7. Attorney should be afforded ample time to elicit pertinent in lion from prospective jurors. Ritter v. Jiminez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); tate, 812 So.2d 540 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2002). + +8. While the trial judge has discretion, it must be exerci not to violate the litigant's right to a fair opportunity to make an intelligible exercise of challenges. Eastern Airlines v. Gellert, 438 ed judgment as to the 3rd DCA 1983). + +## VI. FOR-CAUSE CHAL MUST BE DECIDED BEFORE PEREMPTORY CH S ARE EXERCISED + +1. The Supreme Coptt fms the importance of peremptory strikes and the procedure for preserving error. , there must be no reasonable doubt as to juror's fitness. Equivocal answers can c nable doubt. Kousho v. State 959 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2007). + +## 2. reme Court established that the proper procedure for jury selection + +Challeng s td for-cause challenges before peremptories are exercised. There must be enough qualified rs available, after challenges for cause are ruled upon, so that all peremptories can be used and still have enough people left to seat a full jury. Peremptories are to be used in an alternating fashion between plaintiff and defense. Counsel objected to a system of selection that forced him to exercise peremptories before all valid causes had been granted and which required challenges be exorcised in the dark. The court held, "the only fair scheme is to allow the parties to exercise their + +challenges singularly, alternately, and orally so that, before a party exercises a peremptory challenge, he has before him the full panel from which the challenge is to be made." This leads to a second infirmity in the instant procedure. After excusing one person for cause, fifteen((pr4 Live jurors remained. Allowing for six peremptories left nine jurors. Only six, however, ic rve. e There is no way that 14, 15, or 16 could have served, and, as plaintiffs' counsel they should have been excused. After challenges for cause are made, those excess y the number of needed jurors plus the number of allowable peremptories should be that counsel may know who will serve if not excused."). er Ke t v. Miami Ele 86 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1986). See also Tedder v. Video Electronics. Inc. 491 So.2d 533 A 2002); Van Sickle v. James F. Zimmer. M.D. 807 So.2d 182 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2002) + +In dicta, Justice Atkins of th u re31,p Court made the following observations, "Many trial judges are developing ingenious lens it the time of jury selection in order to expedite cases and increase the case count fo individual or circuit. These judges are conscientious and well meaning, but are allowing disp t' on of cases to become more important than the administration of justice. Unit i ly we contribute to this problem by demanding speedy trials and quick de that the trial docket will flow as steadily as the crowds through Disney World. But the courts not businesses opened for the sale of merchandise or services. In the trial of a case, the jury selection and voir dire examination are just as critical to the outcome as the presentation of evidence." Ter Keurst v. Miami Elevator Co., 486 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1986). + +- 3. Negative feelings which are not party specific may create cause (where there is a bias against general class of cases or issues). Also, there is a difference between "I don't think it should" and + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Memorandum of Law Page 16 of 23 + +"It won't" or "I'd try not to" or "I would give it my best shot." Answers such as "I don't think it should," "I'd try not to" or "I'd give it my best shot" are not good enough to say "It won't influence R me". Four Consulting, LLC v. Fyne, 981 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4`hDCA 2007); So e v. Ahu a. M.D., 902 So.2d 930 (Fla. 5'h DCA 2005). Additionally, reasonable doubt • I overcome , by a juror's silence as to a question asked of the entire panel. Finally, the f. juror may be trying to get off the jury does not change the need to excuse. Four 2 (Fla. 401 DCA 2007). LC v F ne 981 So.2d + +4. [A juror's] admitting to feelings agains n ifijury cacrs, to wit: Believed in caps and thought suits increased insurance and cost e acknowledged it could influence him, because it is pan of his makeup, then quay swer by saying, "It all depends on the evidence presented — I don't have enough info o ut the case to understand whether or not my decision would be influenced —". The In enied a challenge for cause and the appellate court reversed. Rodriguez v. Lagomasino, So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3`d DCA 2008). + +5. The ror asserted that, in EVERY slip and fall case the person who falls is at least partially respo'ible and chat this would factor into his decision. The trial court denied the challenge for cause and appellate court reversed. (Defense counsel erroneously convinced the trial judge to the deny the challenge by arguing plaintiff's counsel had employed leading questions to get the answers and that the juror had later said he could be fair.) Algie v. Lennar Corporation, 969 So.2d 1135 (Ha. 4'h DCA 2007). + +6. Even though the judge asks questions, the lawyer can ask follow up questions. The court noted, "Prospective jurors do not respond in the same manner to inquiry by the judge as they do to questions by counsel". v. State, 785 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3rd DCA + +7. A juror must be excused for cause if they state they wo d S to believe a witness (police officer) over a lay witness. Suede v. State, 837 So.2d 1 DCA 2003). + +8. Plaintiff can backstrike up to time the jury is sw . Minter v. North Broward Hospital District, 889 So.2d 165 (Fla. 4'hDCA 2004). + +9. Florida Statute 913.12 says "the quali a juror in a criminal case shall be the same as their qualifications in a civil case" + +10. The Florida Supreme Co preponderance of the evidence and uses the greater weight of the evidence OR ten i which more likely than not tends to prove an issue. Gilogya 763 So.2d 27 (Fla. " 0). + +- 3. +- 4. +- 5. +- 6. 1.431(cX1) 969 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4" DCA 2007) Auriemme v. State, 501 So.2d 41 (Fla. 56 DCA 1986) + - v. State, 812 So.2d 540 (Fla. 46DCA 2002) Carver v. Niedermaver 920 So.2d 123 (Ha. 46DCA 2006) City of Live Oak v.Townsend, 567 So.2d 926 (Fla. Pi DCA 1990) + +# tAar INDEX OF CASES OF LAWREGARDINGCHALLENGESFQRCAUSE + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Memorandum of Law Page 18 of 23 + +- 7. Club Wes' Inc. v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc., 514 So.2d 426, 427, 428 (Fla. 3r11DCA 1987) +- 8. Disla v. ffi l. 2013 WL 6182395 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 27. 2013) +- 9. Eastern Airlines v. Gellert 438 So.2d 923 (Fla. 3'11DCA 1983) c + +Karen E. Terry, Esquire, of The Law Firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., as counsel representing J. MI hereby serves notice of her appearance in the above-referenced case as additional co a enceforth send all fixture communications should also be sent to terrvteam@searcy a "coil: + +KAREN E. TERRY, ESQUIRE Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Additional Counsel for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB +Notice of Appearance +Page 2 of 3 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of March, 2018. + +![]()[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB +Notice of Appearance +Page 3 of 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; +tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765886/EFTA02765886.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765886/EFTA02765886.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..687e4adcd41be0c34ab1dc6b4c0a2ce54c3b6a4f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765886/EFTA02765886.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765886.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2618, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.55, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 116.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF APPEA c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 326.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 326.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 346.863037109375 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 346.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765886" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a40515e2642e3db09df4904edd7140f8d8c56ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +ORDER GRANTING/DENYING DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF ██████████ J. ██████████ +MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO +ADJUST THE ORDER OF PROOF + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on March 8, 2018, upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. ██████████ Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative to Adjust the Order of Proof. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, Supplement to Motion and the Response in Opposition filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED/DENIED. + +and the court hereby revers the malrious prosecution action or orders a separate trial of same. It is noted that the malrious prosecution action was a "counterclaim". In name only & as has permissive mention. The only commonality was that with Epstein v. Rothstein & Edwards v. Epstein & DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 13 day + +of March, 2018. + +THE HONORABLE DONALD W. HAFELE +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +*to shared the same case number.* + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and ..1.a 15ih Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXIS Orde ' Defendant/Counter-Plainti J. Edwar. s Motion for Separate Trials or, in the Alternative to Adjust the Order of Proof Page 2 + +## SERVICE LIST + +| Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 merasearcvlaw.com | Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmbe,FLAppellpeLaw.com | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| jsx@searcvlaw.com | niseFLAnpellateLavv.com | +| scarolateamOtsearcylaw.com | kbtaFLAtmellateLaw.com | +| termeaml as earcvlaw.com | Co-C unsigindant/Cotmter-Plaintiff | +| dvitale@scarcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff I | J. | +| J. | 6 \Marc S. Nurik | +| Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33401 bradReplIc.com | '.8, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc(az nuriklaw.com | +| Co-Counsel or De endant/Cor ler-P J. Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 13401 iuoldberuer@aawoa.com smahonev@agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant | 1 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Scott@linkrocklaw.com | +| Jeffrey Epstein | Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com | +| | Rachel ar linkrocklaw.com Tina@linkrocklaw.com TrovOlinkrocklaw.com Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Cotmter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df5383165bbf340f8117828b4585692f33ed0021 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889/EFTA02765889.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765889.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 6605, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING/DENYING DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ADJUST THE ORDER OF PROOF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 348.0440368652344, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 348.0440368652344, + 176.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 176.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765889" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee52ae645490585523f23fbcc6439aecd5313190 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.md @@ -0,0 +1,338 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████ J. ██████, individually, + +Defendants, + +**DEFENDANT ██████ J. ██████ MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT** + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, Esq., by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for Final Summary Judgment and in support thereof states as follows: + +**I. INTRODUCTION** + +The pleadings and discovery taken to date show that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and that ██████ J. Edwards, Esq. is entitled to summary judgment for all claims brought against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that ██████ participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of ██████ involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against Epstein. Epstein sexually abused three clients of ██████ - L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe - and ██████ properly and successfully represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in ██████ capable and competent representation of his clients can serve as the basis for a civil lawsuit + +SEARCHED ENCLOSURE +SERIALIZED FOR +FILED +2010SEP22 PM 3:11 + +against him. Allegations about participation in or knowledge of the use of the civil actions against Epstein in a "Ponzi Scheme" are not supported by any competent evidence and could never be supported by competent evidence as they are entirely false. + +## A. Epstein's Complaint + +Epstein's Complaint essentially alleges that Epstein was defrauded by la, acting in concert with L.M. (a minor female who was sexually abused by Epstein) and Scott Rothstein (President of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm ("RRA") where Edwards worked for a short period of time). Epstein appears to allege that joined L.M. and Roth in fabricating sexual assault cases against Epstein to "pump" the cases to Ponzi sdieme investors. As described by Epstein, investor victims were told by Rothstein that three minor girls who were sexually assaulted by Epstein: L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe were to be paid up-front money to prevent those girls from settling their civil cases against Epstein. In Epstein's view, these child sexual assault cases had "minimal value" (Complaint & 42(h)), and refusal to force his clients to accept modest settlement offers is claimed to breach some duty that owed to Epstein. Interestingly, Epstein never states that he actually made any settlement offers. + +The supposed "proof' of the Complaint's allegations against includes alleged contacts with-tire media, his attempts to obtain discovery from high-profile persons with whom Epstein socialized, and use of "ridiculously inflammatory" language in arguments in court (Complaint & 42(e)). Remarkably, Epstein has filed such allegations against despite the fact that Epstein had sexually abused each of clients and others while they were minors. Indeed, in recent discovery Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege rather than answer questions about the extent of the sexual abuse of his many victims. Even more remarkably, since filing his suit against + +, Epstein has now settled the three cases handled for an amount that Epstein insisted be kept confidential. Without violating the strict confidentiality terms required by Epstein, the cases did not settle for the "minimal value" that Epstein suggested in his Complaint. Because Epstein relies upon the alleged discrepancy between the "minimal value" Epstein ascribed to the claims and the substantial value sought to recover for his clients, the settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed to pay while these claims against camera. were pending will be disclose&tEjhe court in- + +## B. Summary of the Argument + +J. Esq., is entitled to summary judgmen allStit 'ipstein's frivolous claims for at least two separate reasons. /1" + +First, because Epstein has elected to hide /behind the shield of his right against self incrimination to preclude his disclosing any mi,evank information about the criminal activity at the center of his claims, he is barred from prosecuting this case against Under the wellestablished "sword and shield" doctrine, Epstein cannot seek damages from while at the same time asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to block relevant discovery. His case must therefore be dismissed. + +Second and most fundamentally, Epstein's lawsuit should be dismissed because it is not only , unsupported by but is also directly contradicted by all of the record evidence. From the beginning, diligealy represented three victims of sexual assaults perpetrated by Epstein. As explained in detail below, each and every one of litigation decisions was grounded in proper litigation judgment about the need to pursue effective discovery against Epstein, particularly in the face of Epstein's stonewalling tactics. successful representation finally forced Epstein to settle and + +pay appropriate damages. Effective and proper representation of child victims who have been repeatedly sexually assaulted cannot form the basis of a separate, "satellite" lawsuit, and therefore is entitled to summary judgment on these grounds as well. + +The truth is the record is entirely devoid of any evidence to support Epstein's claims and is completely and consistently corroborative of sworn assertion of innocence. Put simply, Epstein has made allegations that have no basis in fact. To the contrary, his lawilsi as merely a desperate measure by a serial pedophile to prevent being held accountabltalc tedly sexually abusing minor females. Epstein's ulterior motives in filing and prosec i Nhis-lawsuit are blatantly obvious. Epstein's behavior is another clear demonstration that he s h89fCes above the law and that because of his wealth he can manipulate the system and pay or la s to do his dirty work - even to the extent of having them assert baseless claims agaiqsto It% mee mbers of the Florida Bar. Epstein's -1=' y'' Complaint against and LM is nothing short`of a far-fetched fictional fairy-tale with absolutely ki no evidence whatsoever to support his prepoaterous claims. It was his last ditch effort to escape the public disclosure by and his lients of the nature, extent, and sordid details of his life as a serial child molester. Edward s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted without equivocation. + +#### II. IS ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL OF EPSTEIN'S CLAIMS BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MATERIAL DISPUTED FACTS AND THE UNDISPUTED FACTS ESTABLISH THAT CONDUCT COULD NOT POSSIBLY FORM THE BASIS OF ANY LIABILITY IN FAVOR OF EPSTEIN + +## ARGUMENT + +#### A. The Summary Judgment Standard. + +Rule 1.510(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that a court may enter summary judgment when the pleadings, depositions and factual showings reveal that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Rule I.510(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. Once the moving party conclusively establishes that the nonmoving party cannot prevail, it is incumbent on the nonmoving party to submit evidence to rebut the motion for summary judgment. See Holt v. Ta/colt, 191 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla. 1966). It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers `v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (Fla.1979) (same). + +Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a sununary judgment motion supported by appropriate proof may not rely on bare, \_conclusory assertions found in the pleadings to create an issue and thus avoid summary judgment. instead, the party must produce counter-evidence establishing a genuine issue of mate z . I )14/fact. See v. Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., 479 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. 1st (Dc. \. i Spp. 1985); see also Lanzner v. City of North Miami Beach, 141 So.2d 626 (Fla. 3d Dist Ap 962) (recognizing that mere contrary allegations of complaint were not sufficient to p c131d mary judgment on basis of facts established without " dispute). Where the nonmoving Is to present evidence rebutting the motion for summary judgment and there is no ge issue of material fact, then entry of judgment is proper as a matter of law. See t Hathaway, 408 So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl, 191 So. 2d at 43. + +## B. Epstein's Claims Regarding Have Absolutely No Factual Basis. + +This is not a complicated case for granting summary judgment. To the contrary, this is a simple case for summary judgment because each and every one of Epstein's claims against lacks any merit whatsoever.I + +#### 1. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on All Claims Regarding Rothstein's "Ponzi Scheme" Because He Was Simply Not Involved in any Such Scheme. + +# a. Had No Involvement in the Ponzi Scheme. + +The bulk of Epstein's claims against hinge on the premise that.-was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleg that Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in g ooctiesCi 1 with the best interests of their clients in mind at all times when in reality, was \ . fr. ting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzi scheme described herein." Complaint ¶50. Similar broad allegations are scattered willy-nilly throughout the complaint, although none of the allegations provide any substance as to how might have assisted the Ponzi scheme. See, e.g., id.. at ¶123, 24, 5, 27, 28, 42, 50. In any event, these [Scott] Rothstein and the allegations all fail for one straightforward reason: was simply not involved in any Ponzi scheme, he has provided sworn testimony and an affidavit in support of that assertion, and there is not - (and could never be)Any contrary evidence. actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, + +, has now been deposed at length in this case. As his deposition makes crystal clear, he N had no kno edge of any fraudulent activity in which Scott Rothstein may have been involved. See, e.g., Depo. at 301-02 (Q: " . [W]ere you aware that Scott Rothstein was trying to market Epstein cases ... ?" A: "No."). + +A decision by the Court to grant summary judgment on Epstein's claims against would not affect Epstein's claims against Scott Rothstein. Epstein has already chosen to dismiss all of his claims against L.M., the only other defendant named in the suit. + +has supplemented his deposition answers with an Affidavit that declares in no uncertain terms his lack of involvement in any fraud perpetrated by Rothstein. See, e.g., Affidavit attached to Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as Exhibit "N" at 18-10, 120, 122-23. Indeed, no reasonable juror could find that was involved in the scheme, as joined RRA well after Rothstein began his fraud and would have been already deeply in debt. In fact, the evidence of Epstein's crimes is now clear, and actions in this case were in keeping with his obligation to provide the highest possible quality of legal represenlr for his clients to obtain the best result possible. il + +1 ) In view of this clear evidence rebutting all allegations against him, Epstein must now "produce counter-evidence establishing a genuine issue of material/ f ct." See v. Shands Teaching \ Hospital and Clinics, Inc., 479 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. I R. 1985). Epstein cannot do this. u i Indeed, when asked at his deposition whether he M i vidence of involvement, Epstein declined to answer, purportedly on attome 'ent p !lege grounds: + +Q. I want to know whether yodriave qty knowledge of evidence that personally ever participated in devising a plan through which were sold purported confidential assignments of a structured payout settlement? . . . + +A. I'd like to answer that question by saying that the newspapers have reported that his firm was engaged in fraudulent structured settlements in order to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. With respect to my personal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward to at some point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to assert the attomey/client privilege. + +See Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010 (hereinafter "Epstein Depo.") at 67-68. Therefore summary judgment should be granted for on all claims involving any Ponzi scheme by Rothstein. + +- b. Epstein Did Not Suffer Any Harm from Allegedly Fraudulent Presentations to Investors. + +At various points in his Complaint, Epstein seems to be alleging that he can pursue a claim against because Rothstein defrauded third-party investors. Epstein alleges that various investors were given fraudulent pitches by Rothstein and were bilked out of money as a result. See, e.g., Complaint ¶1 28, 29, 30. Even assuming that the allegations about Rothstein are true (and they certainly are not challenged by this Motion), is still obviously entitled to summary judgment for the additional reason that Epstein was not harmed by these fraudulent pitches. Epstein was obviously not present during these presentations. Indeed, as review of Epstein's Complaint makes clear, he did not even know about the fraud until it became public knowledge through the mass media. See, e.g., Complaint 116 ("The details of this fraudulent scheme bNerevealed on a daily basis through various media report and court documents."). + +To proceed on any of his causes of action, Epstein 'red to prove harm. See, e.g., Bode!! v. Mountains Ins. Group, Ltd., 2 So.3d 1041, 1047 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2009); S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2010). Epstein was not harmed by Rothstein's misrepresentations to other people that he knew nothing about. Summary judgment is therefore appropriate on this ground as well. + +### c. Epstein's Allegations of Negligence by are Unfounded and Not Actionable in Any Event. + +At various points in his Complaint Epstein recognizes that was not involved in any Rothstein Ponzi scheme. Therefore, seemingly as a fallback, Epstein alleges without explanation that "should have known" about the existence of this concealed Ponzi scheme. For example, in his Complaint Epstein alleges: "Upon information and belief, knew or should have known Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for the massive Ponzi scheme . . . ." Complaint at & 26 (emphasis added). Among other problems, this fallback negligence position suffers the fatal flaw that + +it does not link at all to the five counts in the complaint, all of which alleged intentional fraud or conspiracy. + +The five counts in the Complaint all allege criminal — i.e., intentional — activity. The five counts are: Count 1 — Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act (FCRCPA); Count 2 — Florida RICO; Count 3 — Abuse of Process; Count 4 — Fraud; and Count 5 — Conspiracy to Commit Fraud. To take Count I as an example, Epstein alleges that defined in § 772.102(3) and (4), Fla Stat. (2009)." Epstein then alleges (wi committed such crimes as fraud, extortion, and perjury — cri under the FCRCPA. See Fla. Stat. Ann. § 772.102(1)(a). Cr i criminal intent. Proving the crime of perjury, for example,,,reiluir A "engaged in pattern of critailV activity as elaboration) that listed as actionable as these require proof of oof that "testimony was in fact false testimony, and that [the defendant] knew of its falsity and willfully and with deliberation swore to it as true." Rader v. State, 52 So.2d 105, 108 (Fla. 1951) (emphasis added). Proving the crime of fraud requires proof that the defendant acted with "intent to defraud" Pizzo v. State, 455. So.2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 2006) (emphasis added); see 'also Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, So.3d , 2010 WL 2400384 at \*15 (describing as fraud, conversion, civil theft, and abuse of process as "intentional torts" that require "proof of intent"). Moreover, not only do the underlying crimes require proof of criminal intent, but the FCRCPA itself requires proof that a defendant must have acted "with criminal intent," Fla. Stat. Ann. §f 772.1,03(1), or "conspire[d]," § 772.103(4), in order for a cause of action to proceed. Nothing in the statute allows a claim to move forward on a mere allegation of negligence. + +Epstein's negligence claim is also deficient because it simply fails to satisfy the requirements for a negligence cause of action: + +"Four elements are necessary to sustain a negligence claim: 1. A duty, or obligation, recognized by the law, requiring the [defendant] to conform to a certain standard of conduct, for the protection of others against unreasonable risks. 2. A failure on the + +[defendant's] part to conform to the standard required: a breach fo the duty . . . . 3. A reasonably close causal connection between he conduct and the resulting injury. This is what is commonly known as `legal cause,' or `proximate cause,' and which includes the notion of cause in fact. 4. Actual loss or damage. + +Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, So.2d , 2010 WL 2400384 at \*9 (Fla. 2010). Epstein does not allege a particular duty on the part of that has been breached. Nor does Epstein explain how any breach of the duty might have proximately caused him actual damages. Surrunary judgment is therefore appropriate for these reasons as well. + +Finally, for the sake of completeness, it is worth noting briefly that no reasonable jury could find to have been negligent in failing to anticipate that a Staging partner at his law firm would be involved in an unprecedented Ponzi scheme. Scott Rothstei n deceived not only but ' also more than 60 other reputable lawyers at a major law '1. ..x ci, J. f Sun Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 11, 2009, 2009 WLNR 25074193 at \*1 ("Sure, some outlandish John Grisham murder plot[s] sound far-fetched. But if you asked me a few-months ago if Scott Rothstein was fabricating federal court orders and forging a judge's signatt documents to allegedly fleece his friends, as federal prosecutors allege, I would have said far-fetched, too."). No reasonable lawyer could have expected that a fellow member of Lt bt - would have been involved in such a plot. Nobody seemed to know of Rothstein's Ponzi a e, not even his best friends, or the people he did business with on a daily basis, or ev hi fe Many of the attorneys at RRA had been there for years and knew nothing. a lawyer at RRA for less than 8 months and had very few personal encounters with Rothstein during his time at the firm, yet Epstein claims that he should have known of Rothstein's intricate ponzi scheme. No doubt for this reason the U.S. Attorney's Office has now listed as a "victim" of Rothstein's crimes. See Statement of Undisputed Facts filed contemporaneously. + +Epstein's Complaint does not offer any specific reason why a jury would conclude that was negligent, and he chose not to offer any explanation of his claim at his deposition. Accordingly, is entitled to summary judgment on all claims against him relating to Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +#### 2. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on All Claims Regarding "Pumping the Cases" Because He Was Properly Pursuing the Interests of His Three Clients Who Had Been Sexually Abused by Epstein. + +The next claim that Epstein advances is that somehow improperl anced the value of the three civil cases he had filed against Epstein. represented three young women — L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe — by filing civil suits against Epstein for his sexual abuse of them while they were minors. Epstein purports to find a cause of action for this by, alleging that somehow was /• involved in "'pumping' these three cases to investors." Complaint at ¶51; see also id. at ¶¶36, 41, 42(f), 42(k) (similar allegations of "pumping" the cases). + +As just explained, to the extent that Epstein is alleging that somehow did something related to the Ponzi scheme, those allegations fail for the simple reason that was not involved / in any such scheme. , for example, could not have possibly "pumped" the cases to investors when he never participated in any communication with investors. + +Epstein's "p ing" claims, however, fail for an even more basic reason: was entitled — indeed ethicalfrohligated as an attorney — to secure the maximum recovery for his clients during the course of his itial representation. As is well known, "[ajs an advocate, a lawyer zealously asserts the client's position under the rules of the adversary system." Fla. Rules of Prof. Conduct, Preamble. therefore was required to pursue (unless otherwise instructed by his clients) a maximum recovery against Epstein. M, therefore, cannot be liable for doing something that his ethical duties as an attorney required.2 + +Another reason that Epstein's claims that was "pumping" cases for investors fails is that filed all three cases almost a year before he was hired by RRA or even knew of Scott Rothstein. Epstein makes allegations that the complaints contained sensational allegations for the purposes of luring investors; however, language in the complaints remained virtual! anged from the first filing in 2008 and from the overwhelming evidence the Court can self O that all of the facts alleged by in the complaints were true. + +Epstein ultimately paid to settle all three of the cases ed against him for more money than he paid to settle any of the other claims against him. At Epstein's request, the terms of the settlement were kept confidential. The sum that he paid to settle all these cases is therefore not filed with this pleading and will be provided to the court for in•camera review. Epstein chose to make this payment as the result of a federal court ordered mediation process, which he himself sought (over the objection of Jane Doe, client in federal court) in an effort to resolve the case. See Defendant's Motion for Settlement Conference, or in the Alternative, Motion to Direct Parties back to Mediation, Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-CV-80893 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2010) (Marra, J.) (doc. #168) attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Notably, Epstein sought this settlement conference — and ultimately made his payments as a result of that conference - in July 2010, more than seven months after he filed this lawsuit against . Accordingly, Epstein could not have been the victim of any scheme to "pump" the cases against him, because he never paid to settle the cases until well after had left RRA and had severed all connection with Scott Rothstein (December 2009). + +2 In a further effort to harass Epstein also filed a bar complaint with the Florida Bar against M. The Florida Bar has dismissed that complaint. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + +In addition, if Epstein had thought that there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doctrine of res judicata from somehow relitigating what happened in (for example) the Jane Doe case. "The doctrine of res judicata makes a judgment on the merits conclusive `not only as to every matter which was offere received to sustain or defeat the claim, but as to every other matter which might with pro ave been litigated and determined in that action." AMEC Civil, LLC v. State Dept of Tra o.2d , 2010 WL 1542634 at \*2 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting Kimbrell v. ig , 8 So.2d 1009, 1012 (Fla. 1984). Obviously, any question of improper "pumping" of I case could have been resolved in that very case rather than now re-litigated in satellite litI'o lisk + +#### 3. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Claims Regarding Alleged Abuse of Process Because He Acted Properly Within the Boundaries of the Law in Pursuit of the Legitimate Interests of his Clients. + +Epstein's Complaint also raises several claims of "abuse of process." These claims appear to be related to those just discussed;, but culminate in a separate cause of action — count 3 — alleging "abuse of process." An abuse of process claim requires proof of three elements: "(I) that the defendant made an al, improper, or perverted use of process; (2) that the defendant had ulterior motives or purpdS s exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; and (3) that, as a result of st n on the part of the defendant, the plaintiff suffered damage. " S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2010) (internal citation omitted). In fact, this Court is very familiar with this cause of action, as has correctly stated this cause in his counterclaim against Epstein. is entitled to summary judgment because Epstein cannot + +prove these elements. + +The first element of an abuse of process claim is that a defendant made "an illegal, improper, or perverted use of process." On the surface, Epstein's Complaint appears to contain several allegations of such improper process. On examination, however, each of these allegations amounts to nothing other than a claim that Epstein was unhappy with some motion or argument made by This is not the stuff of an abuse of process claim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of pursuit of the claims against him. See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla. 1 s' Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming surnmiry judgment on an abuse of process claim where "appellant's lawsuit caused appellee to do nothing against her will"). + +In any event, none of the allegations of "improper" process can survive summary judgment scrutiny, because every action took was entirely proper. For purposes of completeness, the following is a point-by-point refutation of Epstein's allegations: + +- Complaint ¶42(a): properly included listed damages in Jane Doe's federal action of more than \$50,000,000, because those were the damages that was going to seek at trial on behalf of Jane Doe. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶42(b): was entitled to help Jane Doe exercise her First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain he received in a criminal case, See Statement of Undisputed Facts, and criticizing what happened in the criminal case is not actionable in an unrelated civil case; +- Complaint ¶ 42(c): only asked reasonable questions of E stein at his deposition, all of which related to the merits of the case against . See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶ 42(d): only pursued legitimate discovery designed to further the cases filed against Epstein. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶ 42(e): did not made "ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bite rich" statements, but rather made statements supported by the evidence. For example, there is ample evidence that Epstein has abused more than 400 children, See Statement of Undisputed Facts, a fact that Epstein has always invoked his Fifth Amendment right of silence regarding rather than elaborate. + +- Complaint 1142(0: properly filed a motion seekin to restrain Epstein's fraudulent transfer of assets in federal court where had evidence that Epstein was titling cars and other assets in the names of other persons, See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + +Epstein also fails to meet the second element of an abuse of process claim: that had some sort of ulterior motive. The case law is clear that on an abuse of process claim a "plaintiff must prove that the process was used for an immediate purpose other than that for whic designed." S&I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th Di p. 2010) (citing Biondo v. Powers, 805 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2002). A c a ence, "[w]here the process was used to accomplish the result for which it was inte re rdless of an incidental or concurrent motive of spite or ulterior purpose, there is no omitted). Here, has fully denied any impro \*v , See Statement of Undisputed Facts, and Epstein has no evidence of any such motiva \. kn . , it is revealing that Epstein chose not to ess." Id. (internal quotation ask even a single question about this subject during the deposition of In addition, all of the actions that Epstein complains about were in fact used for the immediate purpose of furthering the lawsuits filed by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. In other words, these actions all "accomplished the results for which they were intended" — whether it was securing additional discovery or presenting a legal issue to the court handling the case. Accordingly, claim that he abused process for this reason as well. is entitled to summary judgment on any + +#### 4. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Claims Regarding Pursuit of Discovery Concerning Epstein's Friends Because All Such Efforts Were Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Relevant and Admissible Testimony About Epstein's Abuse of Minor Girls. + +Epstein has also alleged that improperly pursued discovery from some his close friends. Such discovery, Epstein claims, was improper because knew that these individuals lacked any discoverable information about the sexual assault cases against Epstein. + +Here again, is entitled to summary judgment, as each of the friends of Epstein were reasonably believed to possess discoverable information. The undisputed facts show the following with regard to each of the persons raised in Epstein's complaint: + +- Complaint ¶38(i): With regard to Donald Trump, had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶38(ii): With regard to Alan Dershowitz (Harvard Law Professor), had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Ders tz had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Faket, +- Complaint ¶38(iii): With regard to former President Bill Clinton, had sound legal basis for believing former President Clinton had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Com laint ¶38(iv): With regard to former Sony Record executive Tommy Mottola, was not the attorney that noticed Mr. Mottola's deposition. See Statement of +- Complaint ¶38(v): With, regard to illusionist David Copperfield, had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Copperfield had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Com faint ¶40(i): With regard to former New Mexico Governor Bill had sound legal basis for naming Former New Mexico Governor Bill on his witness list. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. Undisputed Facts. + +It is'WeIrth noting that the standard for discovery is a very liberal one. To notice someone for a deposition, of course, it is not required that the person deposed actually end up producing admissible evidence. Otherwise, every deposition that turned out to be a false alarm would lead to an "abuse of process" claim. Moreover, the rules of discovery themselves provide that a deposition need only be + +"reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b) (emphasis added). + +Moreover, the discovery that pursued has to be considered against the backdrop of Epstein's obstructionist tactics. As the Cowl is aware, in both this case and all other cases filed against him, Epstein has taken the Fifth rather than answer any substantive questions. Epstein has also helped secure attorneys for his other household staff who assisted in the process of recruiti minor girls, who in turn also asserted their Fifth Amendment rights rather than explai happened behind closed doors in Epstein's mansion in West Palm Beach. See Stateme nthsputed Facts. It is against this backdrop that followed up on one of the onl g lines of inquiry open to him: discovery aimed at Epstein's friends who might have position to corroborate the fact that Epstein was sexually abusing young girls. + +In the context of the sexual assault case yards had filed against Epstein, any act of sexual abuse had undeniable relevance to even acts of abuse Epstein committed against minor girls other than L.M., E.W., . Both federal and state evidence rules make acts of child abuse against other girls ad 'ssible in the plaintiff's case in chief as proof of "modus operandi" or "motive" or "common sdGttu i or plan." See Fed. R. Evid. 415 (evidence of other acts of sexual abuse automatically admissible in a civil case); Fla. Stat. Ann. 90.404(b) (evidence of common scheme admissible); Wiltiams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959) (other acts of potential sexual misconduct + +A second reason exists for making discovery of Epstein's acts of abuse of other minor girls admissible. Juries considering punitive damages issues are plainly entitled to consider "the existence and frequency of similar past conduct." TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. + +443, 462 n.28 (1993). This is because the Supreme Court recognizes "that a recidivist may be punished more severely than a first offender . . . [because] repeated misconduct is more reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance." BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations omitted). In addition, juries can consider other similar acts evidence as part of the deterrence calculation in awarding punitive damages, because "evidence that a defendant has repeatedly engaged in prohibited conduct while knowing . . . that it was unlawtti ould provide relevant support for an argument that strong medicine is required to cure the t's disrespect for n a the law." Id at 576-77. In the cases filed against Epstein, his e e entitled to attempt to prove that Epstein "repeatedly engaged in prohibited conduct" pedophile, he sexually assaulted dozens and dozens of mino c ) e discovery of Epstein's friends use he was a predatory who might have had direct or circumstantial evidenceAf i tlicer cts of sexual assault was accordingly entirely proper. is therefore entitled summary judgment on all claims regarding discovery of Epstein's friends. + +- 5. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Claims that He Should Have Known That the Three Cases Had "Minimal" Value Because the Cases in Fact Had Substantial Value. + +A final claim made by Epstein is that "knew or should have known that their three filed cases were weak and had minimal value." Complaint ¶42(h). It is now no longer necessary to speculate about What the value of the three cases is. Epstein paid to settle all three cases. Epstein has insisted that-the\ sum he paid remain confidential. As such, the Settlement Agreements have not been attached as an Exhibit, but can be shown to the Court in camera. In light of the sum that was paid, no reasonable jury could now find that the cases had "minimal value." Accordingly, is entitled to summary judgment on these claims as well. + +#### III. EPSTEIN'S LAWSUIT MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE OF HIS REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN REASONABLE DISCOVERY. + +As is readily apparent from the facts of this case, Epstein has filed a lawsuit but then refused to allow any real discovery about the merits of his case. Instead, when asked hard questions about whether he has any legitimate claim at all, Epstein has hidden behind the Fifth Amendment. As a result, under the "sword and shield doctrine" widely recognized in Florida caselaw, his suit must be dismissed. + +"[T]he law is well settled that a plaintiff is not entitled to both his silence and his lawsuit." Boys & Girls Clubs of Marion County, Inc. v. J.A., 22 So.3d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2009) (=, J., concurring specially). Thus, "a person may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the fifth amendment to avoid giving discovery, using the fifth amendment as both a `sword and a shield.'" DePalma v. DePalma, 538 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 41° Dist. Ct. App. 1989) (quoting DeLisi v. Bankers Insurance Co., 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41° Dist. Ct. App. 1983)). Put another way, "[a] civil litigant's fifth amendment right to avoid self-incrimination may be used as a shield but not a z sword. This means that a plaintiff seeking affirmative relief in a civil action may not invoke the fifth amendment and refuse to comply rJRt te defendant's discovery requests, thereby thwarting the defendant's defenses." olli B rdick Hunter of New York, Inc. v. Euroclassic Limited, Inc., 502 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 3rd D App. 1983). + +Here, trying to do precisely what the "well settled" law forbids. Specifically, he is trying to ob 'n "affirmative relief' — i.e., forcing to pay money damages — while simultaneously precluding from obtaining legitimate discovery at the heart of the allegations that form the basis for the relief Epstein is seeking. As recounted more fully in the statement of undisputed facts, Epstein has refused to answer such basic questions about his lawsuit as: + +- "Specifically what are the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up?" +- "Well, which of Mr. cases do you contend were fabricated?" +- "Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend to be false?" +- "I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the, person referred to as Jane Doe in that [federal] complaint?" +- "Did you ever have any physical contact with E.W.?" +- "What is the actual value that you contend the claim of E.W you has?" + +The matters addressed in these questions are the central focus of Eps Epstein's refusal to answer these and literally every other sub has deprived laims against estion put to him in discovery of even a basic understanding of alleged to support claims against him. Moreover, by not offering any explanation of his allegations, Epstein is depriving of any opportunity to conduct third party discovery and opportunity to challenge Epstein's allegations. + +It is the clear law that "the chief puriiioiet of our discovery rules is to assist the truth-finding -N function of our justice system and to avoid trial by surprise or ambush," Scipio v. State, 928 So.2d 1138 (Fla.2006), and "full and fair discovery is essential to these important goals," McFadden v. State, 15 So.3d 755, 757 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2009). Accordingly, it is important for the Court to insure "not only compliance with the technical provisions of the discovery rules, but also adherence to the purpose and spirit of those rules in both the criminal and civil context." McFadden, 15 So.3d at 757. Epstein has repeatedly blocked "full and fair discovery," requiring dismissal of his claim against + +#### IV. IS ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM EPSTEIN'S INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THEREFORE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL OF EPSTEIN'S CLAIMS. + +is entitled to summary judgment on the claims against him for a second and entirely independent reason: Epstein's repeated invocations of the Fifth Amendment raise adverse inferences against him that leave no possibility that a reasonable factfinder could reach a verdict in his favor. In ruling on a summary judgment motion, the court must fulfill a "gatekeeping function" and should ask whether "a reasonable trier of fact could possibly" reach a verdict in favor of the plainti . Willingham v. City of Orlando, 929 So.2d 43, 48 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2006) (emphasis ad Gi n all of the inferences that are to be drawn against Epstein, no reasonable finder of d conclude that Epstein was somehow the victim of improper civil lawsuits filed agai Instead, a reasonable finder of fact could only find that Epstein was a serial mol children who was being held accountable through legitimate suits brought by on behalf of the minor girls that Epstein victimized. + +"[I]t is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment dies not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 30\$,318`{1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the - r-- rights of others and then escape; the consequences by invoking a constitutional priyilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, "'Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' ---- - Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumslcy v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). + +In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most persuasive character" from Epstein's repeated refusal to answer questions propounded to him. To provide but a few examples, here are questions that Epstein refused to answer and the reasonable inference that a reasonable finder of fact would draw: + +- Question not d: "Specifically what are the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up?" Reasonable inference: No allegations against Epstein were ginned up. +- Question not answered: "Well, which of Mr. cases do you contend were fabricated?" Reasonable inference: No cases filed by against Epstein were fabricated. +- Question not answered: "Did sexual assaults ever take place on a private airplane on which you were a passenger?" Reasonable inference: Epstein was on a private airplane while sexual assaults were taking place. +- Question not answered: "How many minors have you procured for prostitution?" Reasonable inference: Epstein has procured multiple minors for prostitution. +- Question not answered: "Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend to be false?" Reasonable inference: Nothing in L.M.'s complaint filed in September of 2008 was false — i.e., as alleged in L.M.'s complaint, Epstein repeatedly sexually assaulted her while she was a minor and she was entitled to substantial compensatory and punitive damages as a result. +- Question not answered: would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that [federal] complaint?" Reasonable inference: Epstein had physical contact with minor Jane Doe as alleged in her federal complaint. +- Question not answered: "Did you ever have any physical contact with E.W.?" Reasonable inference: Epstein had physical contact with minor E.W. as alleged in her complaint. +- Question not answered: "What is the actual value that you contend the claim of E.W. against you has?" Reasonable inference: E.W.'s claim against Epstein had substantial actual value. + +Without repeating each and every invocation of the Fifth Amendment that Epstein has made and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from those invocations of privilege, the big picture is unmistakably clear: No reasonable finder of fact could rule in Epstein's favor on his claims against + +. Accordingly, is entitled to summary judgment based on the Fifth Amendment inferences that the jury would draw. + +The inferences against Epstein are not limited to those arising from his privilege assertions. Epstein's guilt is also reasonably inferred from his harassment of, intimidation of, efforts to exercise control over, and limitation of access to witnesses who might testify against him. + +Epstein's efforts to intimidate his victims support the inference that Epstaiu.tv that they were going to provide compelling testimony against him. The evidence th in tampered with witnesses (later designated as his accomplices and co-conspirators) wil ible to demonstrate his consciousness of guilt. "[I]t is precisely because of the egreg of such conduct that the law expressly permits the jury to make adverse inferences from s efforts to intimidate witnesses . ." Jost v. Ahmad, 730 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 2nd Dist. 1998) (internal quotation omitted). To be clear, Epstein's attempt to tamper with witnesses is "not simply admissible as impeachment evidence of the tampering party's credibility. The opposing party is entitled to introduce facts regarding efforts to intimidate a witness as substantive evidence." Id. at 711 (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted). This substantive evidence of Epstein's witness intimidation provides yet another reason why no reasonable j uld find in favor of his claims against + +(SI CONCLUSION For all t e fo o' g reasons, defendant, the Court should grant defendant J. Esq., summary\_judgment in his favor on all claims filed against him plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, and any other relief that the Court deems just and proper. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September as 2010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. + +> Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 68. 00 (561 .84-5. 16 ( + +By: + +AROLA Flon.: :arNo.: 440 + +#### SER CE + +8 \ 1 / + +901 777 South Flagler Drive Point West BURNETT P.A. 4c4c)....e E. Knight, Esq. L. Ackerman, Esq. ( West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +S \ + +) + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach ,\_F + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jr. Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +#### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO DIRECT PARTIES' BACK TO MEDIATION + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, moves this Court for an order requiring the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. or in the alternative, for an Order directing the parties to reconvene at a second mediation on or before July 1, 2010, and as grounds set forth would state: + +1. The above-styled matter is currently scheduled on the Court's trial docket beginning July 19, 2010. (D.E. #119, Order Re-Setting Trial Date and Pretrial Deadlines). The Court's Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation and Motions in Limine deadlines are set for July 1, 2010. In this regard, if the parties could reach an agreement at a settlement conference or a mediation before these pre-trial deadlines, it would result in substantial conservation of judicial resources and preparation time. + +2. The parties attended mediation on April 5, 2010, at Matrix Mediation, LLC, with Rodney serving as mediator, but were unable to reach an agreement. (See D.E. #139). + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893•MARRAi + +Page 2 + +3. Since the April 5, 2010 mediation, additional discovery has been completed and exchanged, including each parties' psychological (Plaintiff) and psychiatric (Defendant) expert depositions. As well, Defendant filed his Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Bifurcation. Both parties have exchanged witness and exhibit lists. Each party will be filing extensive Motions in Limine. Plaintiff's Trial Witness List has identified over 170 potential witnesses, and further, Plaintiff identifies over 140 trial exhibits, including composite exhibits that are hundreds of pages in length. It is conceivable this case could last 12- 20 trial days. + +4. Additionally, since the parties attended mediation on April 5, 2010, Defendant has resolved all pending lawsuits, including Plaintiff, C.L. (Case No.: 10.80447) and JANE DOES Nos. 2-8 (Case Nos.: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80802), C.M.A. (Case No.08-80811), Jane Does Nos. 101, 102 and 103 (Case Nos. 09-80591, 09-80656, 10-80309), another Jane Doe (Case No. 08-80804), Jane Doe II (Case No. 09-80469), as well as other non-filed claims. Furthermore, Defendant has also resolved three state court claims. The only cases not resolved are this case and two (2) cases in state court (all three Plaintiffs are represented by Plaintiff's counsel, Brad ME Esq. and his firm). I + +5. Plaintiffs in other filed cases were represented by various law firms as the court is aware. + +6. With the additional discovery completed to date and with the motions, trial preparation and judicial rulings necessary to try this case, all yet to be done, Defendant + +Then is also a case sylerf J M v Jeffrey Epstein CASE NO.: 09-CIV-SI 092 — MARRAi which was never saved on the Defendant. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss. + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARRA + +Page 3 + +believes that a settlement conference or mediation is in the best interest of both parties to attempt resolution. There is no prejudice to either party. + +7. Therefore, Defendant requests the Court issue an order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge or that the Court direct the parties to attend a further mediation before July 1, 2010. Both Magistrate Judge and Rodney (as the mediator in this case) are very familiar with the particular case and other claims that were asserted. + +8. Defendant's Counsel has spoken with the secretary fo lie 4tediator, Rodney a and she believes that he would be able to 2-3 hour mediation on short notice this week. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY4TE respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson, or in the alternative, a mediation on or before July 1, 2010. + +#### Rule 7.1 Certification + +I hereby certify that counsel has communicated by telephone with Plaintiff's counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the issues set forth herein. Plaintiff's position is that the parties have already complied with the mediation requirements. + +By: sfRobert D. Critton. Jr. + +Robert D. Critton, Jr. + +Michael J. Pike + +Attorneys for Defendant Epstein + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARRa + +Page 4 + +#### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated i by CM/ECF on this 28th day of June, 2010: + +Brad r, Esq. , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave. Suite #2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Brad@pathtojustice.com + +Paul G. eagvall, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax cassellofalaw.utah.edu Co-counsel for Plat + ++6s + +Jack Alan Goldbergei;s)q. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561.659-8300 561-835-8691 Fax /Co?ns beelfs:ruthDenf etndant Jeffrey Epstein ti + +Respectfully submitted, + +By: Is/ Robert D. Critton. Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@belclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CR1TTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 5611842-2820 Phone 561/243-0164 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jetty Epstein) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..adb9f4ee9fca08566e65db6df11ffb0a2ec1436a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891/EFTA02765891.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1630 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765891.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 29, + "chars": 51566, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.0, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 303.0, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.116, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 539.946, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 539.946, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 52.116, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.47800000000001, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 204.22199999999998, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 204.22199999999998, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 68.47800000000001, + 456.03 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.87, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 235.42581176757812, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 235.42581176757812, + 169.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 87.87, + 169.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Summary of the Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.87, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 250.01531982421875, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 250.01531982421875, + 278.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 87.87, + 278.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. \nIS ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL OF EPSTEIN'S \nCLAIMS BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MATERIAL DISPUTED FACTS AND THE \nUNDISPUTED FACTS ESTABLISH THAT CONDUCT COULD NOT \nPOSSIBLY FORM THE BASIS OF ANY LIABILITY IN FAVOR OF EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.721999999999994, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 553.8887939453125, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 553.8887939453125, + 595.4780120849609 + ], + [ + 52.721999999999994, + 595.4780120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.822, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 340.8277587890625, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 340.8277587890625, + 526.47802734375 + ], + [ + 264.822, + 526.47802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Summary Judgment Standard.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.87, + 608.1738891601562 + ], + [ + 293.11822509765625, + 608.1738891601562 + ], + [ + 293.11822509765625, + 622.8580169677734 + ], + [ + 87.87, + 622.8580169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein's Claims Regarding Have Absolutely No Factual Basis.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.476, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.051513671875, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.051513671875, + 582.4385223388672 + ], + [ + 88.476, + 582.4385223388672 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on All Claims Regarding \nRothstein's \"Ponzi Scheme\" Because He Was Simply Not Involved in any \nSuch Scheme.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.87, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 502.68756103515625, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 502.68756103515625, + 196.85302734375 + ], + [ + 87.87, + 196.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Had No Involvement in the Ponzi Scheme.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.624, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 408.2081298828125, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 408.2081298828125, + 224.613037109375 + ], + [ + 123.624, + 224.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Epstein's Allegations of Negligence by are Unfounded and Not \nActionable in Any Event.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 496.4120178222656, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 496.4120178222656, + 513.0585327148438 + ], + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 513.0585327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on All Claims Regarding \n\"Pumping the Cases\" Because He Was Properly Pursuing the Interests of His \nThree Clients Who Had Been Sexually Abused by Epstein.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.22899999999998, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 554.8649291992188, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 554.8649291992188, + 223.55859375 + ], + [ + 89.22899999999998, + 223.55859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Claims Regarding Alleged \nAbuse of Process Because He Acted Properly Within the Boundaries of the \nLaw in Pursuit of the Legitimate Interests of his Clients.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.30499999999999, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 511.95318603515625, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 511.95318603515625, + 415.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 88.30499999999999, + 415.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Claims Regarding Pursuit \nof Discovery Concerning Epstein's Friends Because All Such Efforts Were \nReasonably Calculated to Lead to Relevant and Admissible Testimony \nAbout Epstein's Abuse of Minor Girls.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.08699999999999, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 508.59271240234375, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 508.59271240234375, + 624.0535125732422 + ], + [ + 87.08699999999999, + 624.0535125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. EPSTEIN'S LAWSUIT MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE OF HIS REFUSAL TO \nPARTICIPATE IN REASONABLE DISCOVERY.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.201, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 524.0989990234375, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 524.0989990234375, + 98.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 54.201, + 98.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. IS ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM EPSTEIN'S \nINVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THEREFORE TO SUMMARY \nJUDGMENT ON ALL OF EPSTEIN'S CLAIMS.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.68000000000001, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 538.08837890625, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 538.08837890625, + 695.9780197143555 + ], + [ + 51.68000000000001, + 695.9780197143555 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 344.169, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 344.169, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 523.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.67600000000002, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 385.8459167480469, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 385.8459167480469, + 111.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 221.67600000000002, + 111.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SER CE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.825, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 345.30299999999994, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 345.30299999999994, + 359.238037109375 + ], + [ + 258.825, + 359.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.91100000000003, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 433.608, + 240.57 + ], + [ + 433.608, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 169.91100000000003, + 283.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.28800000000004, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 407.4739074707031, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 407.4739074707031, + 111.603515625 + ], + [ + 204.28800000000004, + 111.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, OR IN \nTHE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO DIRECT PARTIES' BACK TO MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.872, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 499.8877868652344, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 499.8877868652344, + 308.4835510253906 + ], + [ + 111.872, + 308.4835510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 360.1996154785156, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 360.1996154785156, + 481.7285461425781 + ], + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 481.7285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 359.5726623535156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 359.5726623535156, + 114.228515625 + ], + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 114.228515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765891" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffa669b8151e7e02a53a11e69eaa79768d71ca39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.md @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant, + +L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +## COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS FOR WILLIAM BERGER'S FEBRUARY 23, 2018, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr pstein ("Plaintiff') hereby designates the following testimony from William Berger's case and/or as rebuttal: 3, 2018, deposition transcript for use in the instant + +| Designation | 17g | tleosteness/Counter / | | | +|-------------|-----|-----------------------|---------------------|-------------| +| | | | Objections | Response to | +| Compound | | +| 112:24-114:13 | | 112:17-113:13 Rel./
Opinion/Speculation | | +| 114:17-117:7 | | 113:18-116:1 Hearsay
SHK/Predicate | | +| 117:12-120:17 | | 116:7-23 Rel. | 117:4-7 Rel./Assumes
Facts not in evid. | +| 120:21-122:4 | | | | +| 122:16-21 | | | 117:12-118:2 Rel. | +| | | | 118:18-119:24 Rel. | +| | | | 120:15-122:4 Rel. | + +| Designation | Completeness/Counter /
Cross Designation | Objections | Response to
Objections | +|---------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------| +| 123:10-124:1 | | | | +| | 124:10-25 | | | +| 125:1-4 | | No predicate | | +| 125:7-12 | | | | +| 125:15-126:18 | | | | +| 126:21-127:1 | | | | +| 127:5-9 | | | | +| 127:14-129:22 | | | | +| 130:6-23 | | | | +| 138:11-139:9 | | Hearsay/SHK | | +| 139:17-140:7 | | | | +| 141:16-24 | | | | +| 144:5-8 | | | | +| 144:18-145:2 | | | | +| 146:15-147:5 | | | | +| | 147:9-148:23 | | | +| 148:24-149:5 | | | | +| | 150:5-15 | | | +| 150:17-24 | | | | +| | 151:1-3 | | | +| 151:4-13 | | | | +| 152:1-153:25 | | | | +| 154:2-11 | | | | +| 154:23-156:2 | 156:9-14 | 155:4-17 Privileged | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all + +Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +## COUNSEL LIST + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ + +██████ Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92d659f0d001bec9b4d168d3a651a06f67d47774 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920/EFTA02765920.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765920.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 13511, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO \nEPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS FOR WILLIAM BERGER'S \nFEBRUARY 23, 2018, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 496.87103271484375, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 496.87103271484375, + 389.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 389.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 88.28999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765920" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd5502926e1806aa6f998f96f4ecf5382ac26f10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.md @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant, L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +## RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018 HEARING TRANSCRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S RULINGS + +Plaintiff, J. by atya through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Response to Epstein's Notice of Serv. f ourt's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Rulings Rulings port states as follows: + +## HE COURT'S RULINGS + +Epstein's notice dOganot include the following rulings' by the Court: + +- is prohibited from making any use of the 724 late-disclosed exhibits. Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 at 59:18-21 +- Defendant Epstein is barred from referririiiiiniahose records as it relates to the documents that were gathered from or from any other source that would have included those records that were the subject of Judge Ray's order. This order precludes anything coming in through the back door which would not be allowed through the front. Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 at 75:24-76:6. + +understands Epstein's Notice to be solely related to those rulings that directly im ct ie late-disclosed exhibits or the documents and privileged materials that are the subject of Judge Ray's order. therefore has not included other rulings made by the Court at the March 8, 2018 hearing, such as the Court's reservation as to attorney's fees the Court's directive that additional supplemental relief may be sought by and the Intervenors related to the disc, or rulings related to other motions that were heard by the Court. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +## EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE + +The Notice states that Epstein, and his attorneys, are complying with the Court's rulings by, inter alia: + +- On March 8, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its co-co I (J Goldberger), its litigation team working on this matter, and its ex , imothy Chinaris, to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of ments obtained from the disc and any copies of the disc that they had 'H ssession. + +While these actions may be appropriate steps in complying wi the 's order, they fall far short of addressing all of the concerns that arise out of the u access to, retention of, and use of privileged materials. First, nothing should be o that has not first been accurately catalogued with all information preserved relev , when, from whom, and by whom it was created and received and to whom copies 'buted. Second, all other documents containing information derived from vl d documents must also be gathered and catalogued. This includes, but is not limi d U mail correspondence, internal memos, attorney's notes, prepared trial materials (soh as prepared examination of any witnesses), and all the records relating to servic performed concerning the privileged materials. Third, the limitation of reference to R ckenbach P.A., Epstein, and Jack Goldberger, Esq. is clearly inadequate when num s other attorneys and personnel have been engaged in rendering services to Epstein in the man years since the defense improperly created and retained the privileged documents. Every Epstein agent must be included in the information retrieval process. + +The Court was very clear that its order "precludes anything coming in through the back door which would not be allowed through the front," and therefore serves this Response to ensure that all documents, whether in hard copy or electronic form, that in any way reference, Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of March, 2018, and will be se the stay is lifted. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing el to all all e Court once + +JAC OLA + +Flo No.: 169440 + +XVITALE JR. + +BEANO.: 115179 + +-Mails: isx@searcvlaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +( ..44mary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. + +139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-3 8.1 + +Attorneys for J. + +adv. Epstein + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +' Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +refer to or contain the privileged materials have been gathered and catalogued and that no relevant information is destroyed in the process of addressing these critical privilege concerns. + +again renews his right to seek sanctions for any further violation of Judge Ray's order, or the March 8, 2018 rulings of this Court. + +[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) + +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire + +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire + +Jay Howell & Associates + +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) + +644 Cesery Boulevard, #250 + +Jacksonville, FL 32211 + +Attorney for Intervenors + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts +and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +S.J. Quinney College of Law +at the University of Utah +383 S. University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Attorney for Intervenors + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae18cf6271e4bcfb864d315d87f3abe941a401e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926/EFTA02765926.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765926.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6491, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018 \nHEARING TRANSCRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 523.41796875, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 523.41796875, + 370.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 370.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 376.2650146484375, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 376.2650146484375, + 478.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 478.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 383.23291015625, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 383.23291015625, + 149.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 149.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 119.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 80 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765926" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18f58c7aab854cc6625c41a1c469534589f47667 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 16, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762, 4D18-0787 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and individuay4, + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +( ORDERED that petitioner's March 12, 2018 motion 4%tO neolidate is granted in part. Case numbers 4D18-762 and 4D18-787 are consolidated anel purposes only. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Karen Elizabeth Terry + +dl + +John Scarolt\ AC(/ Scott J. Link Rachel JeniSer Bradley J. + +LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg) + +Marc S. Nurik Jack Alan Goldberger Paul G. Cassell Clerk Palm Beach \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1106dcff0b7edb8e989754a5d71918c44270ea83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/EFTA02765931.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 831, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 539.9457397460938, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 539.9457397460938, + 102.31201171875 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 102.31201171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 225.5545654296875, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 225.5545654296875, + 277.81201171875 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 277.81201171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765931" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..414ba1d084ae6470a74be1f6312efa1446342df1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765931/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f8c0912fd26db1acfbcffeb4a4a60d5cfa56b60d5b5c81210d9e1fee171a7a62 +size 19963 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc026c326c76b20488053263e7dc014025fa0075 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT NAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Go + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER- ANT'S COUNSELS' NOTICE OF-UNA AILABILITY + +Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defen'nt Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein') hereby provides notice of their unavailability as folio 7 + +- June 11— 18 +- June 21 un 29,2018 +- Jul , 2018 + +Accordio undersigned counsel requests that no proceedings, depositions uled during these periods. trial, hearings or + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm B ch, FL 33409 me law.com law.com scarolate law. .m terryteamesearcylaw.eom Co-Counselor endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. m art & Shipley, P.A. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suit; 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [ + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rocken cMM 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (F 251) Primary: Sco inkr aw.com Primary: K inkrocklaw.com Primary: achel(ainkrocklaw.com Seco' T\* linkrocklaw.com rov(4linkrocklaw.com Eservicealinkrocklaw.com + +(S'/Si e Counsel fo r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLAnpellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a45f83387f736c12a82b16352dc81b372fab789a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932/EFTA02765932.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765932.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4509, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER- ANT'S \nCOUNSELS' NOTICE OF-UNA AILABILITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 431.28411865234375, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 431.28411865234375, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 443.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765932" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43d7b52147ce1c2fe3973e51660f50dc0bf6f4a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 20, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB +AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and +J. [REDACTED], individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that Respondent's March 12, 2018 motion is granted in part. The stay of proceedings granted by this Court's March 9, 2018 order shall apply only to the trial of the underlying matter. Respondent's request for expedited consideration is denied. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach +Philip M. Burlington +Nichole J. Segal +Clerk Palm Beach + +John Scarola +Scott J. Link +Rachel Jenny Glasser +Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Marc S. Nurik +Jack Alan Goldberger +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +dl + +![]()**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_0_Picture_125.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35a05d68edc2e059fe4819bdc6547240db4ce865 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/EFTA02765935.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 964, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.96, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_125.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 104.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 219.09599999999998, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 219.09599999999998, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 289.98 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765935" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/_page_0_Picture_125.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/_page_0_Picture_125.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e1f381cd5c7283a0735cb30350addb01d1a5193 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765935/_page_0_Picture_125.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50eec5916ae1e17075e20098f4c52d50842bef6b56632f8156a55422b8940277 +size 19949 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a5d37048bec74ce02c4ed59a8b3e98b9d08d385 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARINV + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counter-t , Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), will call up the following hearing at the time stated b i Ss, e, the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: , 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom + +# MOTION: Entry of ers on: + +- 1. Cyder Qbferring Ruling on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey 's Motion in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry onnation; Order Denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Damages Expert +- 3. Order Denying in Part and Reserving in Part on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Witness Dr. Bernard Jansen and to Exclude His Testimony; and Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements. + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Mi counsel submitted proposed "competing" orders to the Court via hand delivery on March 21, 2018, over Epstein's counsel's objections. Epstein's counsel objects to the Court's entry of those Orders and requests further hearing before their entry. + +DATE: Monday, March 26, 2018 + +### LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the 'notion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the mo A ,ore self represented. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-fill. of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). meys listed on the ursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINK & Eip49 ACH, PA 1555 P Bre Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 Wei Be-1ch, Florida 33401 600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: KaraelinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
j

| | + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +! i% "Si usted es una persona minusvälida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene dcrecho, sin toner gestos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo mes 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunal q^ inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el liempo ant ceSs la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted S e e • capacitacion del oido o de la voz, Name al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kon ameriken Id Enfim yo na Highway, West Palm Bea jou anvan dat ou ge apre ou fin mwens ke V lb ; e akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan enn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou my Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou al Konte Palm Beach la kf nan 205 North Dixie lorida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 evou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman nvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2f4e8b84314bf6ed687c51860557ac3a8e3aefd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936/EFTA02765936.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765936.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10009, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARINV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 307.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 307.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION: Entry of ers on:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 324.4158020019531, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 324.4158020019531, + 445.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 445.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 72.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 72.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 265.863037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 265.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 72.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 72.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765936" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3f99f8d87c5a3743ca57b0199b97e31b1e54ffe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifE'Countcr-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# NOTICE OF UMC HEARING (Date Agreed to by Coun + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Coun \ - t, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), will call up the following hearing at the time stat SS , b fore the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach Coun , 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 334,Lecse + +MOTION: Plaintiff/ toti ptefendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records on fi einial + +DATE: M pril 9, 2018 + +TIME: (S 8:45 m. (UMC) + ++ Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +A + +Co's + +# LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scotial. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Sco It Primary: Primary: Rac4ekali klaw.com Secondary: Apaelinkrocklaw.com Seconda linkrocklaw.com + +Tr\* ,for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Win + +# E LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach ke u evard West Palm Bea 33 09 metesearcvpw.co jsx®searcylitw.co)n dvitalegearcvlaw.com scarolalam@searcylaw.com terryteam'Qsearcylaw.com Co-Counseitailendani/Counier-Plointiff J. & Shipley, P.A. Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseioaendant/Counier-Plainie J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2.207-1/15: + +**"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711."** + +**"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o immediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha** + +programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o dc la VOZ, Ilaine al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Id entim Id benven akomodasyon pou w ka patisipc nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen p» ON ityon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram 13% a pou ameriken Id Enfim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen ii i \_i yatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret rs , nal la mesens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pott w tande oubyen pale, rei 1." + +CO \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78ad280069c11c05413968942fed2803a04a064e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940/EFTA02765940.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765940.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7081, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.83837890625, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.83837890625, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARING \n(Date Agreed to by Coun", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 388.922119140625, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 388.922119140625, + 321.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 321.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 567.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 567.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 73.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 73.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 431.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 431.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765940" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8af874db04fd4d729105816364f3b27d811344e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.md @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., Individually, + +Defendant, + +## \?) NOTICE FOR TRIAL OF SEVERED CLAIM JEFFREY + +J. (a), bY h undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.440(b), hereby files this Notice forTrial. + +M ' malicious prosecution claim against Epstein is at issue and is ready to be set for trial. expects the trial will take approximately ten (10) days to try before a jury. The trial is on claim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + ++c) + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009 MBAG + +Notice for Trial ' Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein + +Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of March, 2018. Aas + +M AROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): nunccann®searcyla ; and + +Primary E-Mail: @searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney art & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Boulevard + +West Pal orida 33409 + +Phone: 300 + +Fax: 5 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein + +Page 4 of 4 + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..022b8dd68918dd97a916ab4fc17342575242dce6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944/EFTA02765944.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765944.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2999, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "\\?) \nNOTICE FOR TRIAL OF SEVERED CLAIM \nJEFFREY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 325.1015625 + ], + [ + 490.832763671875, + 325.1015625 + ], + [ + 490.832763671875, + 361.863037109375 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 361.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 159.57000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765944" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c26b50221d8845a0bd1b0b8d6b772a005921b59c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.md @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, [N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s). + +cps + +## MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE + +J. M=I by and through ,his undersigned counsel, hereby requests a Uniform Motion Calendar Status Conference basul on the attached Order issued by the Fourth District Court of Appeal on March 20, 2018. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that e correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached 1. t, this Z) day of itio.m.C. , 2018. + +AROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 16 0 Attorney E-Mail(s): and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Status Conference + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com; +kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; +rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 20, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB +AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that Respondent's March 12, 2018 motion is granted in part. The stay of proceedings granted by this Court's March 9, 2018 order subject [REDACTED] apply only to the trial of the underlying matter. Respondent's request for expedited consideration is denied. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach +Philip M. Burlington +Nichole J. Segal +Clerk Palm Beach + +John Scarola +Scott J. Link +Rachel Jenny Glasser +Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Marc S. Nurik +Jack Alan Goldberger +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +dl + +*Lonn Weissblum* + +**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_2_Picture_116.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a15ae8e65db738f90e4bfdb8dba0166335a1be56 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/EFTA02765948.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3790, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.78, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_2_Picture_116.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, [N AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 413.55084228515625, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 413.55084228515625, + 331.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 331.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 148.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 541.62, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 289.17 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765948" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/_page_2_Picture_116.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/_page_2_Picture_116.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..691ac94816a1f91723b5fa2606fefd95e28ce0bc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765948/_page_2_Picture_116.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:12ff6b4bfcba8f831c926f280c9473e33e0e6c5a84a6fee0810c0bbc962ae43f +size 19188 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9f9a8dd7b9a263015984266994bc03484f089bc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.md @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. a + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +cos + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that th undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 26, 2018 Ac (aeG + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable DomitHafe + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of March, 2018. + +*JACK SCAROLA* +\_\_\_\_\_ + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; i you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algún acomodamierOpara poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastbs propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 d s antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente ués de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia qu programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitaci6n del ofdo o deia z, ame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki benven akomo o w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou n pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat o e ndevou pou parét nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevw o syon an si lé ou gen pou w parét nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen em pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +eiS \*) + +Rev: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7060d30d19a09e98d5db2586e01194a8eef9040e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951/EFTA02765951.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765951.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4938, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 115.863037109375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 115.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 370.8151550292969, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 370.8151550292969, + 332.60302734375 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 332.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 427.3931579589844, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 427.3931579589844, + 549.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 549.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765951" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f6b15922200eaf11267a809d743de11e7518b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ..Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 502009CA0408007COCXMB- AG + +se CI) 600i WV ti-130010Z rn + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLAR TIME TO FILE JOINT ST + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and t dersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, moves this an enlargement of time of seven (7) days to comply with this Court's Order dated Se 2010, requiring a joint statement in this matter. The grounds for this motion s ows: + +- ) +- 1. On September 2, 2 10, tart entered an Order that the parties shall file a joint statement pursuant to R t .201(b), ar Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in the above matter, in anticipation of a con nce this court scheduled on October 15, 2010. +- 2. e unexpected emergencies in other matters as well as difficulties with the firm's system, additional time is required for counsel to complete this report. +- 3. Courisel for the Plaintiff requests an enlargement of time up to and including October •I. 8, 2010, for the parties to complete and file the joint statement pursuant to this court's order. +- 4. The undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + +of October, 2010 to: 1CO i l IIEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoi w mailed this day + +5. The undersigned counsel further certifies that an effort will be made to resolve this motion without the need of a hearing. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby respectfully requests this 4grant his 10 enlargement of time for Plaintiff to file his joint statement up to and inclu 8, 2010. + +Jaffe, Wejirs;iEngst, Fistos & Lehrman, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shi P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Wss, P. 250 Australian Avenue So Suite 1400 West Paim Beac 3401;5012 ÷O + +Epstein v Rothstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB- AG +Motion for Enlargement for Filing Joint Statement + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +*Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff* + +[nat] W:\80743\MOTEXT34-Motion to Enlarge Time to The Joint Statement.JLA{10/1/10-9:22} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cb6a8570f1d0bf62b45438fdd740ca0971f58b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956/EFTA02765956.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765956.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2708, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.866, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 516.3477172851562, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 516.3477172851562, + 113.73748779296875 + ], + [ + 265.866, + 113.73748779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLAR \nTIME TO FILE JOINT ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 440.07499999999993, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 440.07499999999993, + 325.23748779296875 + ], + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 325.23748779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein v Rothstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB- AG Motion for Enlargement for Filing Joint Statement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.062, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 536.916, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 536.916, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 289.062, + 112.59 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765956" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d729dfa7cd6c9176a496f3c73dced2dac037b3b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s). 04 + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that th -undersigned has called up for hearing the following: (SI\ DATE: March 22, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable DoneAare - + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC ItTTERS ) TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of March, 2018. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott®linkrocklaw.com; Angela@li Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrockla Phone: (561)-727-3600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 5) Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 S Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nurildaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Roth si in p.my + ++6s + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistante. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if ou are hearing or voice impaired, cali 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodami participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener ga se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de poncrs Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias ante para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia qu e ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del &do o de,lp , me al 711." ara poder os, a que ontacto con e la cita fijada + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki harren akom sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat o oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevw tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen w ka patisipe nan pwosedi n pwovizyon pou jwen kék éd. ndevou pou parét nan tribinal la, syon an si lé ou gen pou w parét nan m pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e412dc6057da03d9cfc673bb0d616c275d3407e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959/EFTA02765959.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765959.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4815, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.948, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 382.8334045410156, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 382.8334045410156, + 331.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 231.948, + 331.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC ItTTERS ) TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 428.8931579589844, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 428.8931579589844, + 548.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 548.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765959" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..911e7bbdd3a30c163bd52f2927c61c2c03f8ef34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.md @@ -0,0 +1,5962 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN MOTION TO MAKE COURT RE 'cif EPSTEIN'S NFIDENTIAL + +S SA + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E • pstein"), pursuant to the 156 Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/W vo e Court to make court records confidential, and in support thereof, states: + +- 1. There is a een Epstein and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff en) 0 the pn eged nature of certain documents that were included on a disc recently obtained Ep m's former counsel, IM +- 2. ' tiNfocently identified exhibits on his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List which included Xm documents from the disc. moved to strike those exhibits both on their untimely disclosure d because he alleged 49 of the exhibits were attorney-client privileged. +- 3. The Court held a hearing on March 8, 2018, at which time Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log was heard. The + +Court struck Epstein's newly disclosed exhibits as untimely but did not make any findings on the privileged nature of the documents. In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the ore tenor request for an in camera inspection and striking of Epstein's newly disclosed exhibits, the Court directed Epstein to file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 62:2-63:1.) + +4. At the March 8, 2018, hearing, the Court also stated that the copy of c entitled "Epstein Stamp" obtained from files should be filed + +> ... that the one disk containing the documents that are et ht to be introduced at trial to take [sic] to record will rrtiitted to be filed under seal. + +(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 75:16-18.) The Court directed the Link original files (including the original disc). Alf. Tr. 80:8-81:15.) AC:fl ch firm to maintain + +5. Because the case was stayed ( Arc ea , 2018, by the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Epstein could not move the s to 1 the disc and exhibits in accordance with Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. 1R however, on March 11, 2018, served a Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2 8, g Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Rulings, a copy of which is attache ibit A. Simultaneously with the filing of this Motion, Epstein is filing the disc an \*al exhibits under seal in compliance with the Court's rulings at the March 8, 291 mg. + +hile on March 12, 2018, nunc pro tunc to March 8, 2018, the Court entered an Agreed Order sealing two docket entries which referenced the contents of documents claimed are attorney-client privileged, the Order did not address the sealing of the disc and the stricken trial exhibits. + +7. The Fourth District Court of Appeal's stay has now been lifted in part. + +8. Epstein recognizes that Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 provides that a request to seal court records must be made by written motion and that the parties may not submit an agreedupon order. Specifically, the Administrative Order provides: + +> I. A request to make court records ... confidential in any type of case must be made by written motion. Parties cannot submit an agreed-upon order. The Motion must be captioned "Motion to Make Court Records Confidential" ... The Motion must identify with particularity the records or hearing to be made confidential and th grounds upon which it is based. ... + +> > \*\*\* + +3. A public hearing on any motion to seal a court r held as soon as practicable but no sooner than notice is given to the public and the press. ..\_ O ill be ys after + +4. A sealing order issued by a court mw st , A specificity the grounds for sealing and the findings peth that justify sealing. ... The order must contain specific findings that the degree, duration, and manner of confidentiality are no broader than necessary to protect the intereOts listed in the Interim Rule ofJudicial Administration 2.420(c)( ). ..:\* + +Accordingly, to assure th and stricken trial exhibits that claims are privileged are accepted by the erk der seal and remain under seal, Epstein requests an Order authorizing such filings a ing the Clerk that such filings shall remain under seal until further order of the Col e c B y Ming this Motion, Epstein does not agree with ME privilege assertions. O + +This motion is being made in good faith and is supported by a sound factual and legal basis. + +# CERTIFICATION + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Fes ) Primary: Scon®lin ockljtw.corn Primary: Karaalinkrocklaw.com Primary: Radlicl(a)linkrocklaw.com Second : Tinaalinkrocklaw.com Seco Tr' linkrocklaw.com servicealinkrocklaw.com + +tinsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO SA + +#### SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS , CRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je '....." Epstein ("Epstein") hereby serves the transcripts (morning and afternoon sessions Compliance with the Court's lifted. arch 8, 2018, hearing, and provides his Notice of pstein will file this Notice with the Court once the stay is + +# THE COURT'S RULINGS + +At th g, the Court made the following rulings: + +- s to Intervenors' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the pleadings relating to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a proposed Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.) +- The sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.) + +I Although no written Order has been entered and the proceeding is stayed, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record. + +- In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2-63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.) +- Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Sessjon, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.) +- Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.) + +On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District ourt ppeal entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review. + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep u co el, Link & Rockenbach, PA, have complied with the Court's rulings at the Mal 2018, hearing as follows: + +- Link & Rockenbach, made any further dissemination of the documents included in the Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Seco Admissible Evi nal exhibits or other documents from the disc that ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Siii ea has asse privi claims over. +- On March 8018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its co-counsel (Jack rger), its litigation team working on this matter, and its expert, Timothy to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents ned from the disc and any copies of the discs that they had in their possession. ÷ • n March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul YY Caccell on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff + - J. Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated. + - Link & Rockenbach, PA is assisting counsel to seal the redacted version of D.E. 1242, Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to ' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for + +Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED]. + +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and has deleted the electronic version from its system. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA, has placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes. +- • In [REDACTED] March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log, Edwards alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged: + +| No. | Ex. No. | [REDACTED] No. | App. No. | +|-----|---------|----------------|----------| +| 1 | 13-1 | 02645 | | +| 2 | 13-4 | 00149 | 35 | +| 3 | 13-5 | 01527 | 3 | +| 4 | 13-6 | 04493-4495 | | +| 5 | 13-7 | 00014 | 36 | +| 6 | 13-11 | 00090 | 37 | +| 7 | 13-13 | 00133 | 68 | +| 8 | 13-15 | 08006 | 31 | +| 9 | 13-17 | 00026 | 70 | +| 10 | 13-19 | 01004 | 71 | +| 11 | 13-25 | 12289 | 33 | +| 12 | 13-30 | 26481 | | +| 13 | 13-34 | 26480 | 60 | +| 14 | 13-35 | 26356 | | +| 15 | 13-36 | 26570 | | +| 16 | 13-44 | 03731-03732 | | +| 17 | 13-45 | 06406-06408 | | +| 18 | 13-46 | 01686 | 48 | +| 19 | 13-47 | 11123-11125 | 50 | +| 20 | 13-49 | 11126-11127 | 32 | +| 21 | 13-52 | 25925 | | +| 22 | 13-53 | 25874 | | +| 23 | 13-56 | 11145 | | +| 24 | 13-60 | 03191-03192 | 4 | +| 25 | 13-66 | 04398-04402 | 2, 34 | +| 26 | 13-67 | 04408-04412 | 1 | +| 27 | 13-86 | 267477 | 11 | +| 28 | 13-88 | 08042-08044 | 16 | +| 29 | 13-89 | 26741-26742 | 13, 15 | + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|-----|---------|-------------|----------| +| 30 | 13-90 | 08059-08061 | 17 | +| 31 | 13-93 | 26756-26758 | 9 | +| 32 | 13-94 | 08036-08038 | 19 | +| 33 | 13-97 | 26762 | 8 | +| 34 | 13-98 | 01117 | 21 | +| 35 | 13-100 | 08121-08123 | 20 | +| 36 | 13-101 | 26749-26752 | 23 | +| 37 | 13-102 | 08128-08130 | 24 | +| 38 | 13-103 | 08118-08120 | 22 | +| 39 | 13-104 | 08131-08133 | 25 | +| 40 | 13-105 | 08124-08126 | 26 | +| 41 | 13-106 | 08135-08138 | 10 | +| 42 | 13-107 | 27494 | 27 | +| 43 | 13-108 | 26760 | | +| 44 | 13-110 | 25997 | 28 | +| 45 | 13-111 | 25937 | 67 | +| 46 | 13-113 | 26604-26605 | 56 | +| 47 | 13-116 | 07019-07021 | | + +- • [REDACTED] also objected to the following additional exhibits as being late disclosed: + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|-----|---------|-------------|----------| +| 1 | 13-2 | 03037 | 54 | +| 2 | 13-3 | 03036 | 55 | +| 3 | 13-8 | 03998-04000 | 6 | +| 4 | 13-9 | 02231 | | +| 5 | 13-10 | 01300 | | +| 6 | 13-12 | 2906-2908 | | +| 7 | 13-14 | 11237 | | +| 8 | 13-18 | 01464 | | +| 9 | 13-20 | 01403 | | +| 10 | 13-21 | 02684-02685 | 51 | +| 11 | 13-22 | 01475 | | +| 12 | 13-24 | 03694 | 79 | +| 13 | 13-26 | 01166 | 38 | +| 14 | 13-27 | 01258 | 72 | +| 15 | 13-28 | 15113-15114 | | +| 16 | 13-31 | 26394 | | +| 17 | 13-33 | 25922 | | +| 18 | 13-37 | 00992 | | +| 19 | 13-40 | 01423 | 7 | +| 20 | 13-41 | 05071 | | +| 21 | 13-43 | 02043 | 81 | + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|---------|-------------|---------------| +| 22 | 13-48 | 02088 | | +| 23 | 13-50 | 11128-11131 | 49 | +| 24 | 13-51 | 08459 | | +| 25 | 13-54 | 08348-08349 | | +| 26 | 13-55 | 08355 | | +| 27 | 13-61 | 27284 | 87 | +| 28 | 13-62 | 26893 | 89 | +| 29 | 13-64 | 01255 | | +| 30 | 13-65 | 26836-26837 | 90,91 | +| 31 | 13-68 | 26807 | 92 | +| 32 | 13-69 | 26808-26809 | | +| | | | 93 AN | +| 33 | 13-70 | 27379 | 94 | +| 34 | 13-71 | 27293 | | +| 35 | 13-72 | 26021 | 63 | +| 36 | 13-73 | 27270 | | +| 37 | 13-74 | 27355 | 97 | +| 38 | 13-75 | 27325 | 100 | +| 39 | 13-77 | 27322 | 101 | +| 40 | 13-78 | 267 | | +| 41 | 13-79 | 2 6 6 | 102, 103, 104 | +| 42 | 13-80 | 8 6089 | 105 | +| 43 | 13-81 | 25 | 52 | +| 44 | 13- | 072 | 108 | +| 45 | | Legamaro | | +| 46 | A- 9 | 27522 | 109 | +| 47 146/ | )3-96 | Legamaro | | +| 4 | 13-99 | 27051-20752 | 112 | +| 49 | 13-109 | 27025 | 111 | +| 50 | 13-112 | 26973 | 84 | +| 1 | 13-114 | 26737 | 57 | +| ) 52 | 13-115 | 26485 | 57 | +| 53 | 13-117 | 27013 | 58 | + +- Link & Rockenbach, PA has marked the exhibits identified above and placed them in a sealed envelope for filing with the Court under seal once the stay is lifted in order to preserve Epstein's appellate record. Link & Rockenbach, PA will retain a set of these exhibits in a sealed envelope in the sealed box maintained in its offices for appellate purposes. +- With the exception of those documents it is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that has identified as privileged. + +- Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which will be filed under seal with the Court once the stay is lifted. +- Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with its original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court. +- Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the further rulings by the Court. oxes until +- Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate e disrc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from i r system and Dropbox. +- Link & Rockenbach, PA will work with its IT pens move copies of any documents has claimed as privileged e-mail servers. + +# ERTIFI ATE F + +I certify that the foregoing document has Service List below on March 11, 2018, via e-m is lifted. shed to the attorneys listed on the ill e served with the Court once the stay + ++6s + +INX & ROCKENBACH, PA 55 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scou J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachelelinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +1 0 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +# TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS + +( S \ + +DATE TAKEN: ay, March 8th, 2018 TIME: a.m. - 12:08 p.m. PLACE N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +Aft\w r + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +> Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +#### APPEARANCES: + +For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE + +For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE ,44(:,90 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQU + +For Non-Parties L.M., E.W \ae Doe + +> HATCH, JAMES & DO 10 West Broadwa e 400 Salt Lake City. 84 01 By PAUL G. C ESQUIRE + +For Jeffrey E + +ATTE GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 2)0 Au ralian Ave. South, Suite 1400 t Palm Beach, FL 33401 CK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: Good morning. Have a seat. + +Thank you. + +Needless to say the recent barrage, as opposed to flurry, of activity that has transpired is of extreme consternation to the court. It has caused me to have to engage in an inordinate amount of time to the exclusion of other matters that nee my attention. ) + +Co + +While the Court understan gravity of the issues that have tra it is with extreme consternat concern that they have transpire n eve of trial, a trial that has ale d een continued once, matters that ave been avoided had timely acti en taken. And the burden on the Cou o try to get through what would roximately four feet of documents is nsive and onerous. I have done the best hat I can to go through the materials, and I had some assistance, which I appreciate, from one of our staff attorneys, in trying to simply wade through the extensive, complicated, and in many situations, years' old documents, some that go back almost a + +decade in terms of their age, and much of which I'm reviewing for the first time. + +So it's against that backdrop we will proceed. We will hear the motion filed by Epstein to remove the case from the trial docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440 first. + +MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your H With the Court's permission, believe not, there is one agreed matter ha we would ask the Court to addr + +I would like to in to Your Honor University of Utah Cassell, essor Paul former ral Judge Paul Cassell, who will prey t t matter to the court. + +: Good morning, Your Honor. Since t s an unopposed motion, it will take 10 seconds to present. + +0 I'm here pro hac vice, which I'm not ure the Court is concerned about. We do have a motion to seal the pleading and related emails. It's unopposed. We ask that it be granted. Temporarily sealed until you reach a ruling. + +an order in that regard, please. + +All right, Ms. Rockenbach. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. May it please the Court. Good morning. + +Your Honor mentioned the barrage that the Court has received. And it's the exact words that I have on the top of my yellow pad to describe the email flurry that h occurred within the last four days, C is have truly made me sick. I co t wait for this hearing to occur b •f the fact that I know this C s not need any more paperwork. ou ed to see the attorneys and u to d the chain of evidence and i was reprehensible that either I or )law partner has been accused of stea1e4V 4 documents. sic That has made me + +0 So I look forward to discussing the privileged nature of the documents. And I thank Mr. Cassell for being here today. + +> Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial docket. It was prompted by Mr. • motion to separate the trials, which was + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +filed on Friday, I believe, for the first time identifying that the fact that the default that Mr. Epstein has against Mr. Roth was on the original complaint and it no longer applied. + +and to Mr. Epstein -- he is absolutely ASA Y Mr. pointed out to this Court Ise correct -- that Mr. Epstein's operative complaint is the Second Amended Comp which there is no default. + +What rule 1.440 tells is to look at the time moved -- it's maybe node to set trial. In this case it a otion to set cause rt to do for trial -- case at issue. + +Rule 1 4 is one of the most strictly complie h mandatory rules of civil dure, which has been recognized by the th District Court of Appeal, and it's ne of those rare instances when a petition for writ of mandamus is appropriate when it's not complied with. + +So we need to look at the pleadings and not try this case twice. This case was not at issue when Mr. filed his + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +motion -- for the obvious reason, when he filed his motion to set the case in the above-styled cause of action for trial on May 24th, 2017. There is no dispute. + +And Mr. has actually pointed it out, Mr. Epstein did not have a default against Mr. Rothstein. + +Contrary to what Mr. I suggestion is, is to cure this issue + +( ;: iiRr + +THE COURT: Mr. Epstein d default against Mr. Rothste have a + +MS. ROCKENBACH: very much. thank you + +Contrary to suggested, t e no cure for a defective motion to s cause for trial. You cannot cure i has + +? Ic/c11ere 14 . In fact, both sides. I cited Labor eady from the Fourth District Court of Appeal in my motion. And I understand Mr. intends to rely upon it. But this was an authored decision by Judge Melanie May from the Fourth DCA. And that case has great language to guide this Court are some cases that have been + +÷ + +on. + +In that case Judge May wrote, "We do not quarrel with those cases or their holdings." + +Your Honor, would the Court like a copy of this case to follow? + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. approach? Mae' + +THE COURT: Yes. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I hav larly highlighted copy for co + +A + +So in that cas thtourth DCA has said, "We don't re with genuine parts of prior Fou case recognizing the mandatory n u and compliance, strict complia ith Rule 1.440." Judge May "We don't quarrel with Bennett versus inental Chemicals." + +However, we point out that none of those cases involve the case that has been pending at issue for years. Those cases were at issue. Meaning, they had a default. They had an answer. They had a final pleading. Twenty days had run. Another 30 + +4 5 6 7 What Judge May said in this case, the Labor Ready case, there was a last minute technical amendment to the complaint. And waived. AoilAv guess what, they went to trial. It was + +8 9 10 11 12 13 That case does not apply. Those f P do not control. What you have befor C Yo r Honor is a -- no waiver, no wa You have an objection that Mr. has pointed out, rightfully case is not at issue. + +14 15 16 17 What I file ?tSh\ he Court immediately, neously with the motion to remove t ase from the docket was a proper on for default against Rothstein. + +18 19 20 21 22 c There is no case that supports ' position to this Court about 7\ evering a case in order to retroactively make it at issue. That doesn't happen in the law. + +23 24 25 The law says, in rule 1.440 in the Bennett case and the Gawker case from the Second DCA, says that this Court has to look + +days had run. Compliance with rule 1.440, check the box. + +4 5 at May 24th -- and that is the salient date that this Court must look at -- because that's when Mr. hastily moved this case and set the above-styled caused of action for trial, May 24th. + +6 7 8 9 To be clear, Your Honor, Mr. did not move to sever at that time. This case has been pending for some eight pl years. He has never before tried to sev r. + +10 11 12 13 14 He, at that time, on May h, instead of pointing out the lack of and by the way, you need a def moved the case. He didn't ev mo iis counterclaim to set for trial oved the case. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 I;;;I;; e C: r, to evidence Mr. i P ent to try this case globall in claim and counterclaim - is appropriate, because the terclaim arises from the main claim - entered into a joint stipulation indicating that that's how the case is going to be tried. + +23 24 25 So it was not Mr. Epstein who caused this last-minute, 11th-hour, II, my gosh, we are not at issue, it was Mr. who + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +pointed it out. + +I researched it over the weekend. And on the very next business day, as soon as I possibly could, I filed the motion to remove the case from the docket. + +I then immediately moved to default. I filiR' have an order for the Court to sign to ent C. ) a default. Served it on Mr. Rothstein' counsel of record, Marc Nurik. And e w 11 then be ready once this Court the default, and presumably eit y notices it for trial in 20 days is then at issue, this Court c set it no less 30 lig 7e days. That is t an atory nature of the rule. + +1% I regr 're here, but this is a strict ! ,NOR. iance rule and we have to be at 1.44s.fr, + +0 And, Your Honor, the last thing either ide or this Court wants is to try this case twice + +THE COURT: Despite the representation, Ms. Rockenbach, that you made in your motion to continue, that Plaintiff and his trial counsel will not seek another continuance. + +We will be to ready to try the case in 90 +days -- + +**MS. ROCKENBACH:** Yes. + +**THE COURT:** -- quote, end quote. + +**MS. ROCKENBACH:** Yes. + +**THE COURT:** Why was that not pointed +out to me upon a review of the docket, +presumably a review of the docket, to +determine whether or not there was, in fact, +a need to strike the trial notice at that +time, instead of gearing up, instead of +spending an inordinate amount of court +resources, and now taking the position that +because what in essence was dilatory conduct +on the part of the Epstein trial counsel +team, dating back to 2011, now constitutes +reason for this case to be stricken? + +Does that not sound inequitable? Does +that not sound inappropriate? Does that not +sound specifically contrary to the quoted +language that I have just indicated here? + +**MS. ROCKENBACH:** The quoted language as +you indicated, Your Honor, I made knowing +that there was a default. + +1 2 3 that default does not apply to the operative complaint. And I never, ever thought that it did not. + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 part of getting up to speed, your responsibility to chec the pleadings -- and as been cited -- at le of them indicate, the responsibili Airc,,ou ,w/ d have been to file a motion to st t case that. A motion to s i the notice setting trial or the tri der seasonably and timely so we would not have been in this position he first place? THE COURT: Isn't that your responsibility? Isn't that the responsibility -- before you make that statement to this Court and make the Ad representation that in light of the fac C!) that you guys were getting up to spe C'd, hat wo i d ave been equacy of e that has strike + +20 21 22 It would seem to me that you are essentially creating the error yourselves by not doing due diligence. + +23 24 25 MS. ROCKENBACH: I wish I had seen it. I knew there was a default against Mr. Rothstein, and that he was in federal + +Ar + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +prison. Never before did Mr. raise this issue that he raised on Friday. + +And by the way, Your Honor, the fact that Mr. has raised it, he is using it as an excuse to sever the trial, which does not cure the defect, and is an appropriate manner to try this case in any event. + +0 Mr. is the one who poin ed Qut the improper defect, who could 6 raised it much sooner. + +Your Honor, I wish een it. I wish I had seen it. nd are ready to try the case, but t no the issue. + +Mr. Edw ing raised the defect now, we cou gb through this trial, get a verdicttip,'Mr. Epstein, and I believe we and then Mr. could appeal on defect because he has raised it. + +. 6 So there is but one action that the Court can take, and that is -- + +> THE COURT: If that transpires, then I quit. Then I am resigning my position. Because if I can't trust what was written already here by you, that you -- that + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Mr. Epstein, as the Plaintiff, and his trial counsel, will not seek another continuance, and be will be ready to try the case in 90 days -- quoted language, pledging to this Court that otherwise this case is ready to go -- and now we are faced with this defect after all of the time and expense that has, been made here and spent here, is real C l travesty. + +And while I say that tong cheek in terms of my resignation, th' -- it would be astounding to mi Si at was, in fact, the case. + +MR. LINK: Shut Honor, may I have permission t next to my partner on this? C + +Sure. Of course. + +. LINK: Thank you. + +O Judge, A÷r ecord is clear. We are not asking for a continuance. The words that we gave you, we are standing by. This is not a motion for a continuance. And the words that my partner told this Court were absolutely true when she said them. They are absolutely true I want to make sure that the + +today. This is not us not being ready. This a legal defect that cannot be cured. + +And I apologize to the Court for where we are and what we have done. And I'm afraid we are going to spend a lot more time together on this case. + +But I want this Court to AOAIC understand that when my law firm says something, mean it. We absolutely do. And we re dot moving for continuance. + +But this case cannot g al with this defect, that's jus . But I don't want this Cou to ink for one second that my p er or I would ever mislead you y omething we didn't mean. I have been dosed of enough of that this week. + +THE COURT: The point that I'm -- nobody is accusing you. + +MR. LINK: Not you, Your Honor. I've been accused of stealing documents and a crime. + +THE COURT: I understand. + +MR. LINK: And that's the first time in 32 years. + +THE COURT: And I appreciate that. I understand everybody's emotions are rather high, based upon the fact that all of this has transpired in such a short amount of time. + +But again, at the same time, as I said A before, it seems to me to be highly inequitable -- and I understand your 0 argument is legal in nature -- but h hl inequitable to come before the and suggest that by way of dila duct on the part of the Epstein, eam in not securing the techni speaking about, against an i prison for my know ali that e is a default dk 1 who at we are will remain in est of his life. Who is, to based anecdotally, only based ecdotal evidence, is penniless and has disgorged of any assets that he has and hat his family has, that somehow because of this technicality we're caused to put this case back and not try the case after, again, an inordinate amount of time and expense, which is in essence taxpayer money, of which this Court has been and continues to be a + +steward of those expenses and time. + +Again, coupled with the fact that it was represented to this Court that there would be no further delays and that the case would be ready to try. That tells me and that represents to me, that counsel has done their due diligence. + +Part of the motion said, "We have = the Court loud and clear, now we" - and Rockenbach -- "are on the c e, with support from the Gunster fi we will not allow the same type uct that transpired earlier e Court was critical of, hap ain." + +That pl this Court means something t s Court. That means that the doc as been assiduously reviewed, hat everything else, short of gearing or trial on the substantive issues that A÷a re before this forum, have been resolved, rectified, and that certainly we are not going to be reaching back seven years on a technicality to somehow thwart the efforts of the Court in trying to moved forward on behalf of both sides to resolve a case that + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +has drawn a significant amount of public interest and that has been pending for -- + +MR. LINK: Nine years. + +THE COURT: Nine years is too simple. Three thousand and thirteen days, as of today. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +Your Honor, if I may. Because wha really important to me, more than an in this case, is our reputatio this Court to understand th moving for a continuanc d I want e not + +A + +THE COURT: ay that was your position, which Nnv here is a frustration + +Continpn s are discretionary under the S law have wide discretion. The Rule o k dicial r Administration of this state -- I do my best to follow them. And you ÷ ave probably heard me at 8:45s make this statement, at least if not expressly, impliedly, that the trial courts of this state shall have a firm continuance policy. + +> Now, while that may not be popular amongst the bar when the Court enforces that + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +rule, it is nonetheless a rule of the Florida Supreme Court, and I do my best to follow the law, despite popularity concerns, of which I have none. + +MR. LINK: And we appreciate that, Your Honor . + +THE COURT: So -- + +MR. LINK: Sorry, I thought you we done. + +THE COURT: I am not exon- g the movant here, by any means. the first one -- + +MS. ROCKENBACH: A cTh ovants being + +q t ar ICIO THE COUR ' talking about The movant ' 61)ing the case for trial. + +or Epste' + +NB : Understood. + +!4cHE COURT: Because has the responsibility to the Court, to this + ommunity, to the taxpayers, to the public, to my constituency, to assiduously review the docket, to ensure that the notice is being provided in accordance with rule 1.440. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +here. It's just, again, a cumulation of having to go through what we have gone through together. Up to now, what I have tried to maintain, a civil, professional and efficient atmosphere despite the nature of the case, despite pejorative comments that were made earlier, which the Court has S indicated will not be tolerated, and th 1 % has been followed carefully by all C concerned, and I appreciate th y much. + +But here we are. I am 7 r with the law. I am familiar ACteh matte statute -- strike that. + +I am famili the rule. I am familiar wit (:.P1 mments to the rule. I am familiar i the case law pertaining to the rul + +I will allow you time for rebuttal, if e + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. + +MR. LINK: Judge, thank you for letting me come up here. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola, again, I share my frustration with you and the legal team, as well, as far as this • + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +conundrum. + +It is disappointing that a firm of your stature, an attorney of your stature, of which I have an abiding respect for all of those who are serving their clients in this case, that, again, the docket was not assiduously combed, and we are left here today with the very real possibility of case not being tried as scheduled. + +Your response, please. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir Honor, let me first of all poi hat rule 1.440 only permits ar o notice a matter for trial issue. + +And at our notice was filed, we were not rty to the case that was pending nst Mr. Rothstein. And quite y, had no concern about that case. It simply not a matter that we cared about, 7\a nd quite frankly believed, for the reasons that Your Honor has referenced, that it would never really be tried. + +> This is a defendant who has absolutely no ability whatsoever to ever respond to a judgment against him. + +And our concern with regard to Rothstein arose when we were informed of the witnesses that were intended to be called ostensibly in the case against Mr. Rothstein, which was a damage only claim Alic for a conspiracy to commit abuse of process, a claim, which if it had been defended, would have been thrown out because ther no tort because of the litigation pr vil ge for conspiracy to commit abuse ocess, and there could not possibl any conceivable version of ever be a claim for damages b 41r pstein in connection with + +Nonethe . are told that there are here's going to be testimony from Mrs thstein -- excuse me. From stein's victims in that portion of the that Mr. is going to be called •n that portion of case. + +And what became apparent to us is, that an effort was going to be made to use the rouse of a claim against Rothstein as to which we would have no standing to object, to insert into the record information that + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +facts. So what was going to happen if was going to be a focus on the under allegations -- We are obviously contesting those A(54Ar Isy + +THE COURT: Against Ro + +MR. SCAROLA: Agai -- is that the same jury must accept thes legations; and then they were going tyt ty d, you g to be told, you can't accept those alleg . And that obviously in and of Itl.f created a need for us to ach the Court and ask that these claims evered. + +would never be admissible in the claim of + +against Mr. Epstein. + +It became a particular concern to us, because once a default is entered, the jury is obliged to assume the truthfulness of the facts that are alleged in the complaint. + +We then determined that there was no valid default ever entered against Mr. Rothstein. It didn't happen. And that's not something, again, that was ever a concern to us. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +represent him. I am uncomfortable about the idea of having to be involved in a trial in which I might have to be raising objections that would appear to be objections on behalf of Rothstein to what's going on in that first portion of the case. + +So we found out about the procedural defect. Now the issue becomes, does Yo Honor have the ability to address th problems? And the answer to t estion is clearly yes. + +of a pe A \$;) counterclaim -- and er s no doubt about the fact that tru s a permissive counterclaim efs s within the sound discretion e Court. + +T : The question that I had in reviewing the material, is this r 1 a counterclaim at all, albeit t echnically brought as same, because no longer is a defendant in the matter brought by Epstein? + +> The sole defendant, as I understand it, on a one-count issue is Rothstein. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +AdV?ha i rguable, Epstein's claim brought against the only connection that is even is that, in fact, the case had its genesis in the fact that Epstein originally brought the claim against Rothstein, and L.M., and then voluntarily dismissed the case at the eve of summary judgment. + +as a counterclaim only because that's the procedural posturing in which it arose. + +But, when a voluntary dismissal was taken with regard to all claims against , it's no longer a counterclaim. It's now our claim against Mr. Epstein. + +ASA Y + +THE COURT: And while it has its O genesis in the original action filed C y) Epstein against Rothstein, Edw- nd L.M., the fact that simply becaus- its genesis there, as I was n to think this through among the of erials that I had to review -- an ere substantial -- is that can it rgued that the only connection ten Rothstein's claim bought against strike that. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +I.e., is there any law that supports the proposition that this would, in fact, be a separate action at this juncture having no technical, even legal connection, between the claim brought by Epstein against AC54r Rothstein for some type of conspiracy issue, and what is now a separate malicious prosecution claim -- albeit having its ( ..)q 1r genesis in the original Epstein acti but having nothing shared at t 7 ncture, either technically or legal -r than a case number? + +MR. SCAROLA: nor, I think that our claim ag amended, qu a unquote, counterclaim that is really separate action. We are here to try Aiciame that is flawless ic. stein on a fourth + +(But while I understand the Court's oning and agree with it, we don't need ÷to try to technically call this something other than what it was derived from, and that is a counterclaim. + +> Because the law is very clear that this Court has the discretion to sever for separate trials a counterclaim. And that's + +the second -- excuse me -- that's the Third DCA case that we cited to Your Honor, Turner Construction Company versus ENE Contractors. + +And let me hand -- let me hand the other copy of that to Your Honor. + +So we can assume without needing to reach the argument as to whether this is o is not still a counterclaim we can a that it is a counterclaim. There is question about the fact that i permissive counterclaim. + +And we are in a po n7 whereas the Third District Cour eal observed, it is within a tria e s discretion to sever a perm ounterclaim from the main claim DL tSere is no evidence of prejudi + +And I was very pleased to hear Mr. Link Ms. Rockenbach stand before the Court A÷a nd tell you, We are ready for trial. Because that's what they told you. They told you that back -- they told you they would be ready back in December, and they are telling you again, We are ready for trial. We are not asking for a continuance. + +We only want to remove a technical defect that might have us try this case twice. + +Well, I assure Your Honor, there could not be a clearer example of waiver on our part of any technical difficulty than I am asserting to the Court right now that could A never and will never be the basis for any appellate argument on our part. + +0 So, next, the Court goes on to ay, "An appellate court will not inter a ith procedural rulings of a tri unless a party is deprived of ntial right by the procedure em + +AS 71 So let's lo t the procedure employed, an District Co Ready v he unanimous f Appeal told us in Labor the Australian Warehouses minium Association. Fourth + +THE COURT: And again, the mule of me 'wading through these documents, if you can hand me cases as we go along, I will appreciate it. + +MR. SCAROLA: Absolutely. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +4 5 6 court speaking through Judge May, as I said, an unanimous opinion joined in by Judge Gunther and Judge . And I am looking at the third page, the last page of this copy, Your Honor, and it's the highlighted language. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 "This is not a case where the case ha never been at issue." Nor is this. "T is not a case where the parties did of have sufficient time to prepare." i this. "This is not a case where a prejudiced by the techn' ndments to were talking about adding a p rver damage claim to the complaint. the complaint." Th + +16 17 18 19 "In si ons where the parties have receive ual timely notice of the trial, are precluded from arguing prejudice d upon a technical violation." + +20 21 22 23 24 25 Here we don't concede that there is any technical violation at all. But even if there were to be, the Fourth DCA says not a basis to disturb a trial court decision when there is no evidence of prejudice. And we are being told no prejudice. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: Speak to me again about the issue where, in a setting such as this, if both matters were to be tried together, the position that your client would be in having to prosecute his claim and in essence try same time. AC:;Av potentially try to defend Rothstein at the + +Isy MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. I think t that's really clear. The allegation C) against Mr. Rothstein are, eve his later version of the compla' sically identical to the allegat s hat were made against Mr. upon the complaint which a vol 141 ri 1'y dismissal was taken as to Mr. Ed + +So the circums is told in a default all of the allegations must be ted as true. And the only issues that e are issues with regard to causation nd damages. + +We are contending that there could be -- first of all we are contesting the underlying allegations. The jury is being told accept them with regard to Rothstein. You can't accept them with regard to + +4 5 6 7 8 The other problem is, we are contending that there could be no damages incurred by Mr. Epstein as a result of anything that went on with regard to a Ponzi scheme in A(54r which he was not an investor. + +9 10 11 12 13 what went on at Rothstein, EticY We are also contending nothing Adler can form the basis fo m because of the litigation privi solute immunity of the lit' ti privilege. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 So the defe excuse me -- the plaintiff in versus Rothstein C A' case begins h 'r proof about h case by putting . Epstein was alleged on to have damaged by these absolutely immune vities. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 AT?h What do I do at that point? I must stand up every time any of that evidence is being adduced before the jury, and I must object on the basis that this cannot apply to Mr. . I'm in the position of defending Mr. Rothstein, of objecting on the + +Epstein, they are contested. + +So that's the first problem. One jury being told to assume two different things. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 causation grounds, of objecting that no injury could have been caused, of objecting on the basis that this is all absolutely privileged information. And from the perspective of the jury, I am now defending this man who is sitting in federal prison for 50 years. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 And that simply creates extraordin prejudice to my client. It creates confusion on the part of the j nd it is absolutely unnecessary; and under these circumstances pro y precluded because there is no 4ca f against Mr. Rothstein. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 So this as discretion to solve the problem u simply sever the permiss ounterclaim or the separate and you allow us to proceed to trial case that Mr. Epstein's lawyers have they are ready to try. + +21 22 23 24 Let's do it. Let's go to trial. They said they are ready. The Court has the ability to cure whatever obstacle conceivably exists to trying this case. + +25 My client finally deserves the + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +opportunity after 3,000 whatever it is days to be exonerated publicly of the terrible charges that were lodged against him and hang out in the air and hang out in the cloud and hang out in the Internet some nine million point six hundred thousand times. + +I am pleased to answer any other O questions Your Honor may have. But lea ly AS We would like our day in court, sir. the Court has got discretion to do hat we would like you to do. Just' .nds that you do what we would lijc ouu to do. Thank you, sir. + +> THE COURT: you, Mr. Scarola. rr + +Mr. Line 2 + +MR. LINK:/ Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: As I mentioned, and I want t 'y S, gi(S e you the opportunity to comment on point. + +"A!imh, In trying to think this through and rationally engage in a discussion, quote, technically and practically, I start with a proposition that the last amendment to the complaint that was filed on behalf of Epstein was solely against Rothstein on a + +singular count. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: Clearly that was done after what was termed in quotation marks that I am using, a counterclaim filed by at a time when was, in fact, a named defendant in that particular action by virtue of Epstein's decision through counsel, presumably, to no longer in lud as a defendant in that n, the terminology and the trappin t would otherwise go along with ing entitled counterclaim would s e, would legally disappear, in of wo ds, had Mr. and counsel C e to file a separate action. ) + +: Yes, sir. + +4 THE r COURT: Had this case gone away in entirety S -- let's say, just for the heck f it, that Epstein decided to completely walk away from the lawsuit in its entirety, just walk away -- + +MR. LINK: Could have happen. + +THE COURT: -- as many do, okay, there was no longer a counterclaim, it is now -- + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +and has really always been, since the time that Epstein -- strike that. + +That was no longer a defendant in the case, a separate action, no longer a counterclaim, technically or practically, A(504A r because there was no pending claim against , at least as late as the second amended or whatever iteration of the 1\$ .1 0 complaint that was filed in Septembe of 2011. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. a tand Akst that. It's really easy iday Mr. Scarola figured is'k.ft. We have had this case for ni ea s. His client was dismissed in Why didn't he come here in 2012 an Judge, this is no longer a counter, I want my own suit? If he had PAOCS17d -- + +OTEE COURT: I don't think he needed to that. Why did he have to make a declaration of such, when by operation of law -- again using September 11th, the last iteration of the complaint filed by Epstein against Rothstein only -- + +÷o + +THE COURT: -- there is no longer the trappings, the necessity of a counterclaim. There is no pending claim against by Epstein. It essentially -- it essentially morphs, then or becomes -- better stated - longer applies. It has no application Ad Ar a separate action, because counterclaim no whatsoever. It's a separate action. O + +The only thing that it shares n I will give you a chance I apologize. oment. + +> MR. LINK: No, you )dA S ,ng great. + +THE COURT: Th thing that it no are's is a common case number. Tha Okay. ing -- the only + +> MR. LIQ:J That's no longer important. + +T ionship There's no longer any + +OMR. LINK: Not true. THE COURT: -- Epstein versus Rothstein is separate and apart, and has absolutely no connection at this stage of the game -- now there may be some tangential things that are shared in terms of the nature of the case, and some may even suggest that if they were + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +both separately brought that it could constitute a transfer. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: Because it involves, at least arguably, the same transaction and occurrences that may have transpired here. It may even suggest the potentiality of consolidation. Though, on further revi it would come before me and there wo argument against it, the likel oo. and I'm just speaking generical Akst not suggesting how I am goin anything that's not it cou e denied because of -- I wrote down h e re Mr. Scarola mentioned it -- confu of issues before the jury and the ntial, the real potential of dice when you inject a convicted felon the notoriety of Mr. Rothstein, who is for the rest of his life, that's made international news, that continues to be shown on CNBC I forget the name of the show that has to do with greed -- and what's happened now with Mr. , in terms of the separate action arguably, A÷sitting in prison le on the Court -- but + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 that he has brought, albeit, again, having the genesis of the original claim, that has been dropped. But there's nothing that would have prohibited him from bringing a separate action, nothing that would prohibited a long time ago that I S e can think of, because of the fact that the no longer have any interrelationship O legally. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Now, again, I will grant factually there may be some . I'm a purely legal standpoint, t s rate action, there is nothing, t I can think of that would necess'fe these two matters to be toget r not suggesting that. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 fact that substantial confusion be operable here -- as argued by sel and as written down by the Court, ven before the mention of the word -- and the prejudice that would be done here, may even create a better forum for each of the parties to get their justice that they are seeking, i.e., Mr. Epstein's damages against Rothstein. I am not sure whether causation + +becomes an issue or not. I think it's simply a matter of damages, but that Rothstein has the opportunity to defend himself against. + +But , on a totally separate no semblance to a counterclaim, has his ASAP' legal theory, and in a case that now bears Isy right to seek justice in a timely fashi well. Why not? + +MR. LINK: My turn? + +THE COURT: Yes. + +MR. LINK: Okay. S4gbanT things to say. + +First, Judg ou 'nailed it. In 2012 Mr. Scarola ve come to this Court and said al t things you just said. + +What is preventing him from g it now? What's prevening it from ening now? Why can't I follow what I erceive to be, as often is the case, as I mentioned this probably before, the practical nature of a judge like Judge May from the Fourth District of Court of Appeal, taking the bull by horns, as she often does, has the gift of being able to clarify and + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +distill often very complex matters, to provide not only legally correct results, but practically correct results, which is why I admire her writing and the way she goes about things. + +MR. LINK: As do we, Judge. + +THE COURT: Why is it that somehow technicality, which really is -- which in my view, no bearing on the legal CP- o the legalities of the situatio C ther were technically oriented o practically oriented. + +But there's no of the fact that this is separate, his really is no longer a cou ji m and hasn't been for ..A the last servo eight years. + +Judge, we disagree with I don't think it's that simple, I ly don't. I think we're confusing two ssues, and let me start there. + +There is the issue of . It is clearly within this Court's discretion to sever this case. We are not disputing that. We are not saying you should. We thought we were talking about whether the case was at + +issue. + +But we can talk about and whether it makes sense or not. And this Court needs to understand, no matter what Mr. Scarola wants, Mr. Rothstein is going to be part of this trial, whether we are suing him or we are defending their counterclaim because this case is all about whether can demonstrate that there is a connection between Mr. and Mr. Ro That's what he says caused + +We're going at some point in whi 100 percent cert connection. to be at evidence elieve with e can make that + +THE CO(i) what? The connection between + +l4Sr. Rothstein discussing the Epstein cases nd getting around court scrutiny. LINK: Between Mr. and + +THE COURT: didn't you plead when you had the And that's fine. Why it and maintain the claim opportunity to do that? Instead there was a dismissal of the claim against and an abandonment of those + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 claims back years and years ago. And a choice was made to proceed only on a one-count complaint against Rothstein as of September 2011, thereby, as I indicated earlier, losing any trappings, losing any indicia of counterclaim, at least by that S point and likely before that, because ther were several iterations of the complain I!) that were amended, subsequent to the C dropping of from the c m, thereby no longer making it a count It was in name only. It had n significance whatsoever, except + +14 15 16 MR. LINK: Your Honor. The legal signif if I can approach, is laid out in u pretrial stipulation. + +17 18 19 case law is really clear. When rs enter into a pretrial stipulation, Honor should follow it. + +20 21 THE COURT: And I am wholeheartedly in agreement. + +22 23 24 Let me stop you there, because, again, you have argued it, and I don't want to make a short trip to that. + +4 that slips my memory as far as its name is concern -- spoke eloquently and at length about the sanctity of the pretrial stipulation. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 So before I even read it, and what it says here, you quoted from it, that's what I read it. I didn't go back and look at the pretrial stipulation itself, among the (2) just so everybody knows -- among the 1,29 docket entries here. So i anybody to suggest that it don ly by Cic virtue of laxity that I. ' n• review the actual brief. + +14 15 16 MR. LINK: (e S \ here's none of us in this courtro have any doubt about how much time ve put into this case. + +17 18 19 ortunately there are probably s filed that you haven't even received filed before we got the notice. + +20 21 THE COURT: You got my rather brief response. + +22 23 24 MR. LINK: The brevity was hard to miss. We got it. And we filed these before. + +25 But the reason this joint pretrial stip + +Alit\ Y + +is important, Judge, is you keep saying they are not the counterclaim Plaintiff, and Mr. Scarola and I negotiated this together. We wrote it together, we made changes together. And every part of this pretrial stip and the jury instructions and everything we submitted to the Court sets Acr;r ar this case up to be tried, Epstein again Rothstein, first issue to be cited, ays right in there. + +The second issue to be versus Epstein. We've how we're going to try this c ve attached exhibit lists, w ss lists. We do stipulated f c , ur Honor. + +So the no part of the pretrial that we red into, long before carola's motion at 5:00 on Friday ng to sever this case, that was ever c ontemplated by the parties. + +We entered into an agreement, two lawyers. That's what a stipulation is. We entered into an agreement, Judge, on how we would try this case. Now Mr. Scarola wants to change his mind. This is our contract. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: But it's interesting, because in this pretrial, here is what it says. Quote, case against Rothstein. What, if any, damages were sustained by Epstein and proximally caused by Rothstein? + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: Parenthetically, continue does not agree with this language for the III (on )hat the issue as stated fails to t ca sation to Rothstein's operation of zi scheme. the quoted provision. + +It is that failure to limit the issue hi way as to Rothstein has a potent onfusing the jury in determinin h her Epstein had any probable cause t im damages arising out ofeSe y same circumstances, end of quote. + +0 MR. LINK: Which means hat prejudice is gone. That's what he's telling you. He agrees to this issue. He doesn't like the way I framed it. That's the difference. if you limit it, + +If I put his language in, which tied it to the Ponzi scheme, he wouldn't have added + +1 2 3 that. So all he is saying is, Judge, I agree it's going, but I don't like Link's language. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +That is not him saying I reserve the right to not go forward with this claim. + +And when you read through this contract between me and Mr. Scarola, as two officer of the court, and Judge Ciklin's opinio and everybody else's, we are suppose be bound by what we say here. + +So that means, yes, yo iscretion to sever cases, you always \ Severing case, if that's a d the the Court makes, doesn't change t ac Y, that when Mr. Scarola this case, the one we have a pret stip on, Judge, the one you entered rder on, which was the case, was t issue. We don't like it. It is what It's the law. + +And one of the differences in what Mr. Scarola say and what the law is, is that every case where there was a waiver or technicality was post jury trial. + +The Fourth DCA has said mandamus is appropriate, it requires no prejudice, it + +requires you to follow the law. + +THE COURT: So what Mr. Link is saying, Mr. Scarola, is that if I grant the motion for , this case is going to go up on a writ or mandamus? + +MR. LINK: I don't mean it in a threatening way, Judge. + +THE COURT: I don't take it that w + +MR. LINK: But that is the trut + +THE COURT: McLean Stevens o ce said to , ' , you over my head so many times, i h prints on my scalp." + +MR. LINK: the easy fix. We don't need m If you decide to sever the cases atever reason, 20 days from today, carola can notice his case for and you can set it for 30, and we will ere to try the case, and we won't seek a ontinuance. + +Al÷c I don't think you should sever them, but that's within your discretion. But you can't fix today what was wrong in May, that's the problem. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +just for record, the case I keep on my bench is Palm Beach Polo holdings, Inc., et. al versus Broward Marine, Inc. I have the original email from the Fourth District Court of Appeal copy. So I don't have a cite for you, but it's from 2015. That's easily accessible if you'd like to read itA ,S + +MR. LINK: Thank you. + +I know Mr. Scarola said they're exc ted to try the case, believe me, we are really excited to try the c + +The evidence that w cintly discovered -- + +THE COURT: Sn A\aive the technicality u are so excited about it, then wa he technicality. + +MR : I won't do that, Judge. + +THE COURT: Well, repeatedly you cate that -- you have indicated today ÷ how excited you are about trying the case. + +MR. LINK: I am. + +THE COURT: Yet -- + +MR. LINK: With the best judge in the circuit. + +4 5 6 7 8 THE COURT: Another TV show. Quit telling her how beautiful she is, we all know you are lying. You can figure that one k out yourself. But anyway -- that's the husband speaking about. + +9 10 (:i... it' 00' MR. LINK: I am excitedly cauti (: us nd I cannot waive the legal right. + +11 12 13 14 15 c 4 THE COURT: Well, that' t I'm A s e trying to say about you i ment. The repetitive statemen n the motion is that your client u ncJilling to waive the technical is + +16 17 MR. L We don't think it's technic I think that's the difference. + +18 I just jump in? + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OTHE COURT: yper technical under these set of facts. The hyper technicality arises because of what I have already explained in detail. And that is, that this is really not a counterclaim, and hasn't been a counterclaim since Mr. Epstein made his decision to drop It is my respectful view, + +MR. LINK: For this case. How's that? So I don't get in trouble with the other judges. Did I save myself there? + +Ai + +from the case, which only provided the genesis for what was at the time a counterclaim technically. Perhaps even that might be able to be argued because of the fact that it came after the dropping of + +as a party to the claim. But certainly, without equivocation, after the second and third and whatever else 0 o7 iterations of the complaint as amend C d a of September of 2011, there was no lance of a counterclaim because he /// w .nger a party defendant in the o de by Epstein against Rothstein o d that's where I'm talking abo a technicality, that despite the s on the part of Epstein C to try the s , as enunciated by Mr. Link repeate + +ecc. LINK: Mr. Link's excitement. + +0 THE COURT: Well, I presume always that A÷c ounsel is speaking by and for his or her client. + +> MR. LINK: I am, Your Honor, but I am personally excited. + +> THE COURT: Good. But again, it is without the willingness to waive the hyper + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +technicality. + +Ms. Rockenbach. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, I just wanted to add an appellate point. It sounds like you and I are both mutual fans of Judge Melanie clarity. She authored both of the Fourth DCA's decisions that you are guided by, the genuine parts decision a S C2) well as the Labor Ready decision. submitted to the court, is not h :er technicality in that the ru it's mandatory rule, an May was noting and in the progeny o se that existed before those two de I am referencing the Bennett cas shall, tyls what Judge g and recognizing + +h his Court has recognized is that ds could have but did not move to sever case back in 2011 when was ismissed. + +THE COURT: Was there a need to do that? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes. Absolutely. I was thinking about this. In other instances, I have had counsel come up and + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +tried to swap party names and drop, and switch, and -- you can't just do that. You have to actually -- I think there's an administrative order on it. I think you have to go to the court do it. + +But in this instance, you absolutely -- Mr. had the onus to come before th4 Court and say a few things. He could h .0P made his case separate. He didn't, (1 e c ose not to. He waited at least sev tars or to come le a motion the at issue as six and a half years, by my on Friday after 5:00 p. to sever the trial an excuse to sev + +He didn to sever previously. It was not at sue when he filed his motion on May IrpF 2017. Mr. hat Mr. has presented to this Court And there is no case -- no case that I could -- and I looked -- and there's no case that says, you can cure the mandatory rule or defect of 1.440 by severing a counterclaim or a cause claim. + +The last point I would like to make is Mr. Scarola said the rule 1.440 says a + +4 5 party. It says, "any party." And that's significant. The reason why it says any party is that rule talks about crossclaims. It talks about counterclaims. It talks about any party. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 So any for trial. didn't move ) set his counterclaim for trial. He moved the -- the language is i • otC.ion, and I am sure it's in the C -xtensive docket -- he move to se 's Case, quote, party could have moved to set it And when Mr. moved, he as just Mr. trying unquote, and quote action, quote, u te. tyle cause of + +15 16 17 18 19 20 'be made, 441171 So he c y ould have moved to sever at that tim e did not. He waived the right t mely sever the action. And we the Court grant the default against today, unless there is argument to and -- + +21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: How does this change, though, your trial preparation if I sever the case today as opposed to I severed it Judge , my predecessor, severed it back in 2011 when it no longer was a + +counterclaim, it was a separate action sharing only the same case number? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: It changes the ability for to file a ripe 1.440 notice. Because it was not severed, he noticed the entire action for trial when the action wasn't at issue. So severing doesn't cure it. + +0 ' THE COURT: Well, I am asking y C u, ell me how, for the record, how it fe is your trial preparation or your p ion at trial? 1 think you nee that on the record. + +MR. LINK: Your Honor. It doesn't change our t paration. It changes how we try a ase. There is a significant differe n me being the Plaintiff in the and going first and my burden of proof what Mr. Scarola wants to be is the laintiff. + +And he had a choice. He could have filed a separate action, and he would have been the plaintiff. + +He chose -- he chose the vehicle. He doesn't like his vehicle today. He decided 4 on Friday he didn't like it. But he chose the vehicle of a counterclaim. That means I go first, he goes second. He hates that idea. + +5 6 7 8 So it changes and it's prejudicial if these cases are severed, because they are so intertwined, Your Honor. I can't even thi of a case that's not more intertwined. O + +9 10 11 THE COURT: You have the right first if the Rothstein case is efo e this court. + +12 13 14 MR. LINK: In that But I have the right to go fir is case because he has the count + +15 16 THE CO on't agree with you there. ou have that right? + +17 18 Because I am the plaintiff i kSe r case, I go first. + +19 20 OTHE COURT: he case against You are the plaintiff in + +21 22 23 24 MR. LINK: No. But the first issue we described in the pretrial stip that's going to get tried is my issue against Rothstein, that means I go first. + +MR. LINK: I don't go first in the trial. + +THE COURT: That's precisely the question I asked and it was not answered correctly. + +MR. LINK: Sorry. + +THE COURT: That's okay. + +I just want to make sure that we a clear that if consideration is given trying both of these cases tha ein would be able to prove his • claim against Rothstein. S + +> Yes. MR. LINK: + +A( + +THE COURT: on the count i -- we are calling it the counterclai the claim brought by against ein clearly, in that particular ac(tcsl, esses first. it relates to issues Mr. Scarola would be bringing his + +MR. LINK: Absolutely, Judge. I think I spoke poorly. I appreciate you correcting that. + +But the way the pretrial is setup and the way the case is structured, the first case the jury will hear will be my case + +1 2 3 against Mr. Rothstein. Then Mr. Scarola will present his case, and we will defend that. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +So one of the things that's in my mind that I can't let go of, is how do we sanitize Rothstein from this case -- that's what Mr. Scarola wants to do -- when his whole claim against is we wrongly filed pleading that connected Mr. Rothstein. That's what Mr. Edw has said has kept him in anxiety eve • e day since December tion to Rothstein. 2009, th + +So, they h show that we have probable cause to make that a tion. he ' urden of proof to + +se you, Your Honor, when we get gh the evidence, you will see there was ty of reason to make that allegation. + +So I don't know how you sanitize Rothstein from this case. So if he's going to be in case, isn't it more efficient to do it once? That's what the pretrial says. Mr. Scarola and I contracted to that. + +The issue that really is the + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 struggle -- and I get it -- the struggle is, yes, these two cases are intertwined. Is there some machination I can do that would put this case at issue? And the answer is you can't. There's nothing you can do to cure the May defect, Your Honor. That's the problem. I know that's what you would lik to do. I get it. + +9 10 11 0 THE COURT: Let's take a five-m nut break. We will be back moment- We will be in recess. Thank y. + +12 (A recess was had - 11:24 a.m.) + +13 14 THE COURT: did you finish your argument o i sue? + +15 16 17 18 MR. L confident I did, but, you know, i and for me to turn down an opportu to say more. But, no, Your I think we said it all. + +19 THE COURT: Thank you very much. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Scarola, the one thing, again - well, not the one thing -- multiple things that went through the Court's mind when I was dealing with this was the question I posed to Mr. Link, and that is, that the pretrial contemplation of the case -- of the + +A'itS:14.) + +action being tried together. And the anticipated response to my question that trial strategy -- albeit now that we have ironed out the way in which the order of proof will proceed -- could be materially effected, and thus prejudicial to Mr. Epstein's position if the cases are no tried together as noticed. + +Your thoughts. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. C understand what unfair prej •ossibly arises to Mr. Epstein wh jury is instructed that the onsider these cases separately + +The onl ej aice would arise if Mr. Epstein ermitted to do what it is now obv r. Epstein plans to do, and is to use his case against Rothstein to improperly influence the j ury with regard to Mr. ' claims against Mr. Epstein. + +> The Court recognizes the fact that there is tremendous danger of confusion and prejudice if these two cases are tried together, following the plan that it has now + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +become evident Mr. Epstein plans to follow. + +What unfair prejudice arises if these two cases are tried separately? The answer to that question is, there can be none. And one of the reasons why there will be none is, the separate case against Mr. Rothstein, I predict, will never be tried. + +AkAr + +If it is ever tried, it's a one-da trial. It's a jury selection withou opposition; there's a presenta a case without any opposition; the closing argument without any op i. The case is over in a day. t they get, if they get anythi an uncollectible judgment. + +THE CO';i:.) What about the pretrial stipulate Judge Ciklin speaks, again, about the sanctity of the pretrial ulation. at + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: He calls it the attempt is to, quote, avail ourselves of the opportunity to once again stress the tremendous efficacy of The Pretrial Stipulation. He puts each of the words, + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "The Pretrial Stipulation" in capital letters -- strike that. In capitals to start each of those words, and drops a footnote stating, quote, out of respect for and to dignity the use of The Pretrial Stipulation we have intentionally capitalized the name of this important trimgtk efficiency tool, end quote. + +9 10 11 12 13 0 , MR. SCAROLA: And Your Honor, h C s n ted the operative language. Your o has noted the reservation thatAL rued in that pretrial stipulati Nt concern for prejudice. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 in in that pretrial stipulation s ¢ports the position that is being ar a on behalf of Mr. Epstein, and tha that we have somehow agreed we are going to delay our right to 1 by jury while we wait -- perhaps A÷f orever -- for the claim against Mr. Rothstein to be placed at issue. So there's + +22 23 24 They can't get a default today. There's been no notice. I don't know whether they're ever going to get a default. + +25 We become hostage to their decision 1 2 3 about whether they are going to proceed against Mr. Rothstein if Your Honor accepts the argument that they are making. + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 uickly under Now, I have had substantial experience before this Court. And your Honor is not a Judge who has ever been deterred from doing what you consider to be the right thing to do because there's the threat of an app They want to petition for writ f C court believes that the arg hat are being made today have m will know before we finish ou inary screening of the jury on ( T should be none -- whatever concerns Honor has will get resolved very those circumstances. + +21 22 23 24 If there has ever been an argument for waiver -- if there has ever been a clear demonstration of no prejudice, this record establishes that. + +25 Judge words, "Depending upon the + +mandamus, bring it on. And if pellate + +The Cou act immediately, knowing that this c s going to proceed to trial. And what concerns Your Honor has -- and + +circumstances, the mandatory provisions of rule 1.1440 may be waived." + +They have been waived. They agreed that this case was going to be tried without any further delay starting next week. They told Your Honor they would be ready for trial. They told Your Honor they are not asking for a continuance. They told Yo Co Honor they are ready and anxious to ry this case. + +There has been a waive technical objection tha exist, but there's no technica tion. There is no technical object' + +This is ep fate claim. It has proceeded a a eparate claim. It was noticed trial as a separate claim. is nothing in the pretrial suggests otherwise. stipulation + +We have not stipulated with regard to anything having to do with the Rothstein case, because we don't represent Mr. Rothstein. His signature and no signature of counsel of his appears on that pretrial stipulation. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +This pretrial stipulation relates to the trial of what is a separate cause of action by against Scott - excuse me -- against Mr. Epstein. + +Judge May, again, "Here the complaint was filed in 2002. The parties had adequate time to prepare for the hearing, and the trial court had provided the parties the requisite 30-day notice. There ambush or violation of the pro du 1 safeguards that Rule 1.440 gned to protect. That's this c + +A + +There is nothi at very best, a hyper-technical a that is being raised. The fusing to waive it, because the t want this case to ever be tried. + +l4SAnd y if Your Honor is concerned about mountain -- the avalanche of paper with hich this court has been assailed, I can assure you that it isn't going to stop if we don't start on Tuesday. It's going to get worse. + +÷ + +The defense, in violation of this Court's order, last week listed 724 new + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 exhibits that they want to use. And they are going to use this hyper technicality to say the pretrial order was invalid because the case was not at issue; a new pretrial order needs to be issued; discovery is not yet closed; we have an opportunity to proceed to take additional discovery; and can amend our exhibit list, and we can O include 724 new exhibits, and more w ich they say they are still findin + +11 12 13 14 15 The only way to put an l^ this is to proceed to trial as or informed everyone we would, certain terms, the last time t ase was reluctantly continued by urt. + +16 17 18 19 So aga y client has been waiting for nin rs to clear his name from the atory allegations that were made nst him in a maliciously filed lawsuit. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 He was accused of heinous crimes, of being associated with one of the most massive Ponzi schemes in history. And the only way he can effectively exonerate himself is by getting his day in court, and he deserves to have that now. + +So the solution is very simple. Whether it's a claim or a counterclaim, you have the discretion to sever it. It gets severed. The case is at issue. it goes to trial. + +We are ready to proceed, and we ask you for the right to be able -- enforcement of the right to be able to proceed. Thank sir. + +THE COURT: Thank you, Mr Thank you, Mr. Link and Ms. well. ola. ach, as + +tneSk'aCtc I hand the Court one c apologize. It's cited in my May I approach? + +THE CO Sure. MS CH: It is the Bennett Because -- + +OTHE COURT: I have it. Bennett versus +Continental Chemicals? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Right. And just to respond to Mr. Scarola with regards to -- + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry, Your Honor, can we put an end to this, because there's a + +lot that we need to do? + +THE COURT: I thought that she just wanted to mention the case. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I do. + +THE COURT: I have it here and I have it highlighted. I have reviewed the highlighted provisions of the case. ASA V + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. It is IS' 0 about the fact that you can't cure t e defect. + +MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorr objecting to further argument, Yo and ask that we please move + +THE COURT: give you a minute to finish up. + +MS. : Thank you, Your Honor. + +ett, the party, just like dwards is doing here, suggested to the t to sever in order to fix the rule .440 deficiency, and the appellate court said no you can't do that, and "The procedure for setting actions for trial is simple, but many attorneys are careless about it. They serve a notice for trial prematurely. This requires a motion to + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +strike. And there's not excuse for failing to follow the rule." And it goes on about how the rule is not directory, it's mandatory. + +So this Bennett case speaks to exactly AQI5Ar what is evolving here in terms of the issue. It doesn't correct the defect. Thank you. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +MR. SCAROLA: Does Your Ho or ant a response? + +THE COURT: No. + +MR. SCAROLA: sir. + +MS. ROCKE have a moti fault that we filed simultaneouLy) And I have a proposed order for the Your Honor, we do + +THE COURT: Thanks. + +0 I don't know if you've looked at the 'Brien versus Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association, a case which is from the Fourth District, which indicates that it negatively treated the holding -- at least one of the holdings in Bennett versus Continental. And + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +it is a Fourth District Court of Appeal case, similar to the reliance by Epstein, principally, on the Gawker versus Bollea case. Bollea, if I recall correctly, is Hulk Hogan from wrestling. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: But again, this Labor 'lilt case, authored by Judge May that we hav(2)4 been speaking about, declined to extend khe Gawker case to its handling of abor Ready case from the Fourth. + +I haven't seen the i case. will give it a real can be as compre I ook, so that I lye as possible. + +MS. R 1030? Is that at 942 So.2d + +TH\$ URT: It doesn't give me a ion in this. It just says Fourth r rict Court of Appeal. March 18th, 1998 the date of decision. It doesn't give me a cite to report. + +But I can look it up real quickly. 710 So.2d 51. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I am reading that case right now, Your Honor. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +THE COURT: By the first blush it doesn't look like it has anything to do with -- + +MR. LINK: We don't see a reference, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: It talks about fundamental error, is really what it goes to. + +It cites to the case and its citat is, quote, We have not been as willi some of our sister courts to f fundamental error where an on had been raised by the tria -- strike that -- had been rai d the trial court. The error could been corrected and a new trial wo a been unnecessary. + +One o h string of cites cites that Bennett There is no specific cation of that case to this one here. + +My ruling is as follows: The Court has n preparation for this hearing carefully weighed the respective positions taken by the parties. And I appreciate the well-written briefs and the well-articulated positions taken as it relates to this issue. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 District, as far as the Court is concerned, is the Labor Ready Southeast, Inc. versus Australian Warehouses Condominium Association case. But not so much for the Court's position that it's taking as it as a secondary proposition in its ruling A(4Ar relates to waiver, which the Court will use today, but more so the spirit and inten 5 ) the case and the message that Judge (. ay nd her colleagues, in my respectf w sent to the trial courts and the ors, particularly here in th District Court of Appeal jur nal area. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 The primary in and what the Court is going to m' e here is that it will sever the c and will try and proceed with th ards versus Epstein matter ncing as scheduled on Tuesday, h 13, 2018. + +20 21 22 23 Today being, for the record, and for ease of review, March 8th, 2018. Reference being made to Friday, March 2, 2018. So, again, for ease of review. + +24 25 Because, frankly, when I'm reading appellate briefs sometimes from the county + +Isy + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +court, it makes it so much easier when the trial judge sets forth the dates as opposed to having to go back and try to reconstruct the timeline when the court is making its ruling. + +The is based on the fact that there is no legal relationship between the, case against Epstein and the da claim by Epstein against Rothstein s lel on a singular-count-amended compl - again, forgive the lack of specifi to the iteration of the amende p int -- but again, as late as S 117 e and a half years -- and the fact that the Epstein je ff led of 2011 -- six in its capacity, as reasonable lawyers, to have secured the def if it sought same, so as to, in faith, maintain its claim against + +I have no recollection whatsoever of anything coming up during the approximate four years that I have presided over this case in division AG of anything whatsoever having to do with Mr. Epstein's prosecution of that one-count complaint against + +Rothstein from that September 2011 amended complaint. + +Meaning the entire focus of this Court in the multiple hearings that have been held, in the deluge of paper that -- in part the Court brings on itself because of its preference to have the hard copies, as opposed to utilizing modern technology solely the computers. It's much easier me, frankly, and my eyes, phys to have the paper. It's not b necessarily wanting it. ore so because of it's easi o y eyes and causes much less strai eyes than having to rely on just puter copy. I wanted you to know as well. + +c ounterclaim, but in this Court's view is rance in this case, whether it one in September of 2011 or even before when the -- what is called the not. It may have been because at the time back in December of 2009 -- if I'm not mistaken is when the claim was brought in against Epstein. That's the approximate time. + +So now we're dealing with approximately seven years ago -- seven plus years ago from the time that the action was brought by Mr. against Epstein. + +Technically, because there may not have been an order signed by the Court, whatever AS closing documents that are usually and customarily dealt with in closing out a file, may not have been in the court that time, perhaps, technicall constituted a counterclaim. deniably, the trappings, the name gal effect was not a countercl 11, and certainly illik le bore no semblanc a 'counterclaim once Rothstein dr dropped Ed -- I apologize -- and proceed t 4100lely against Rothstein. wards once Epstein + +And whether took place or a rate claim would have been brought in ecember of 2009 -- albeit because of the potentiality of the pleadings not being closed, so to speak, as to at that particular time, so it may have been called a counterclaim. But certainly, and without equivocation, once that case shifted -- now + +4 5 Mr. Epstein didn't have to shift it. But it was by his own doing. He shifted it, because he no longer had as a defendant in the case. He took that operative step. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 So it was in name only that this continued having the moniker of a counterclaim, but it wasn't one. It ha genesis in Epstein versus Rothstein, rds and L.M. case so as to permit s to bring the claim against Rot But undoubtedly, it no long counterclaim 4' ,, for at least the pa se or eight years. + +14 15 16 And in name remove this unquestiona ere a hyper technicality. am not going to m the docket on what is + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ÷n ot believe here directed by the Fourth District of Appeal to do so, I will, as always, duously follow their order. But I do -- because the focus of the last eight years has been against Epstein. claim And in reality, in name only, since the dropping of from Epstein's case, his own voluntarily dismissal of , creating a separate + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 claim, albeit having its genesis, as all malicious prosecution claims do, in that prior action, there is nothing that has been argued to today to suggest that a separate action has been, could have been, and, in fact, is at issue here. And that has been aware of, juxtaposing the Epstein versu the focus, and the only focus that I am S C. ) Rothstein case here; that being the ly focus has been for the last se eight years; and clearly the four that I have been presiding over 's Case, solely the versus malicious prosecution clai + +15 16 17 18 And aga not going to be bound, and I don't k any trial court should be bound b j ye choice of words that may have used to name a given pleading. + +19 0 It's a separate claim, and it has been. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 4÷A nd clearly and without equivocation has been since, somewhat ironically, what has been brought this matter before the Court is the September 2011 claim that was solely brought by Rothstein I mean, by Epstein against Rothstein. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +It essentially highlights the precise position that is being taken by this Court legally, factually and practically. And that's the best that I can do. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. AQIcjair I have proposed orders that just simply grant Mr. motion to sever and denying Epstein's motion to remove. + +And I also have a default for Honor, along with the motion fo de ault, if you would like to entertain, well. + +THE COURT: Any ob. + +MR. SCAROLA: represent Mr. Rothstein, Y Ho or But I don't know how that deft be entered without notice to M1 Bbthstein. + +He a counsel, who has appeared in case. That is, in that case. I don't whether -- I'm not arguing. I'm e xpressing a concern. + +THE COURT: Excuse me. And I apologize for interrupting. + +What I was going to say is this. If he has had representation in the case, then he would have to be noticed in order for the + +Court to enter a default. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Understood. + +THE COURT: And since this is, again, a later iteration of a complaint to which my understanding was -- he did respond in some fashion originally through counsel or not? Or was he defaulted from -- + +AS 1 MS. ROCKENBACH: Earlier on. I'm by co-counsel early on. + +We served it on Mr. Nurik Mr. Rothstein's counsel. T ion I am asking is whether it wa i d for hearing today. It went out st ay. + +THE COURT: ouldn't have been an appropriate ce So it would have to be re-noticed Nurik, and we will proceed accordi once what appropriate notice has + +iiiiiIIII. ROCKENBACH: Correct. + +THE COURT: I just want to make clear, as well, that I have taken into account, by virtue of the ruling that I have made, the contention that somehow trial strategy - and that was at the behest of the court. I don't believe it was argued in the motion. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +virtue of the . But again, in my efforts to try to be as fair as I possibly can to both sides, I raised it to hear from Epstein's counsel what, if any, prejudice would be done by + +And again, respectfully, again, in my view, I believe that the response that was the() Court's position here. And, that is th added reason for the Court's s- ce is the fear of the Court, agai rtue of its going through thous pages of documents by now, h in cores of motions and being expose ore, reviewing deposition t cr ts, having the anecdotal knowledge t t he Court has of Mr. Rot s criminal activity, and the that it inues to be, because Attention that remains -- just an example, being a CNBC special that continually runs on American Greed, I believe is the name of the show -- that this biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of state of Florida remains very fresh in the minds of many. provided is, in fact, supportive of is and was, and potentially of the media + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +And hence, a second reason, a third reason for is the absolute danger of confusion relative to a jury's consideration of ' cases versus Epstein's case against Rothstein solely. + +While facts overlap, the Court can consider and would consider the confusion issues as well as the prejudice, undeni that would be done here if both of these cases were tried together. + +Clearly, as I indicate inception of this hearin am not pleased by the events that ur here. No court should be. The s several fold, including th dual who is sitting here, who u I tely is responsible for the executi t that trial order. So I have, degree, blame myself for the execution hat order. And ultimately I bear the r esponsibility of that, and I recognize that. + +> But at the same time, as I have mentioned on numerous occasions before groups of lawyers, who have been kind enough to ask me to speak on these types of issues, + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +just generally in terms of how we do things here, tips from the bench and the like, we so rely on the bar and exceptional lawyers that we have here in terms of our daily business. + +That doesn't exonerate the Court in executing the trial order. But it sheds some light on the busyness of the Court the fact that we are, at the present as you know, responsible in eac the civil divisions of anywhere 1,100 to 1,200 cases to 1,5' to ses in some divisions. The low r is done by ,13 f At e design because o f our judges has agreed to handle th the tobacco litigation A% cases, so t t udge has a reduced caseload, deserve + +But it does highlight our expected ance on counsel so that these things on't occur in the future. And it's a good reminder to all concern about how these things can crop up. + +But here hyper technicality should not stand in the way of a pending matter of over 3,000 days and nearly nine years. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +And again, I do not want this order to reflect a suggestion that the Court is willing to deviate from the dictates of 1.1440 -- strike that. 1.440. But instead, as I indicated before, the primary impetus here is one of for the reasons that I have tried to state as clearly and concisely as I can, balancing the right strategies and obligations of each p rty s concern, balancing what I perc o be in the best interest of justic concerned, balancing th Mr. Epstein to proc inst Rothstein, recognizing the separate nat of ' claims against Epstein; an t fact - but at the same + +4 while facts may overlap, it does xtinguish the proposition that the t has indicated, and, that is, whether everance be done now, six months ago, seven years ago, or eight and a half years ago, from December of 2009, it would have been the appropriate and right thing to do under these particular factual circumstances. + +All right, we have bumped up now + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +against the lunch hour. + +What do you want to handle next? + +MR. SCAROLA: The evidentiary issues that have cropped up in past week or so. + +MR. LINK: Would Your Honor mind entering the orders first once we agreed to the language? have + +THE COURT: That's fine. + +Off the record. + +(A discussion was held of record.) + +Your Honor? + +THE COURT: Aga, , n1mmendation to our court reporter, is exceptional and always such ea re to work with. We appreciate r cork. + +h s a case that -- from the Fourth ict Court of Appeal that criticizes one r y now former colleagues in terms of the rder saying, "for the reasons stated on the record." + +So in an abundance of caution, I think it would be best suited for that portion of transcript to be transcribed. You can do it rush if you need to. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +I am sure Ms. Sonja would be happy to oblige to the best of her ability. And, really, only that portion of it so that - my decision would need to be rushed, I think. + +MR. SCAROLA: Attached, for the reasons stated on the record. Attached. + +THE COURT: If both sides feel thaCm4.) that's sufficient. + +Ms. Rockenbach, is an app v specialist. I defer to her ty. + +Mr. Scarola, I kno ve also been involved in numerou whether directly or indi but your name llate decisions. appears on m + +ncede to your expertise only the fact that one of our most Again to brin cted and one of our former circuit t judges was criticized for the order in he manner in which it's being presented to me. + +÷ + +MS. ROCEENBACH: You're correct. I am aware of that decision, unfortunately. And I would ask the Court for a break so that our court reporter could type up the -- not + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +just the ruling, but we need the entire hearing transcript in order to have a complete record. + +So we would ask for a change in court reporters, as reluctant as I am to do that. I know it's my duty to my client and to the Court. + +THE COURT: I respect that. And a you will have to deal with Sonja dir + +For the record, again, ize for not using her last name. nown each other for many years. A ow she takes no personal qualms it, ecause we have spoken about th fo e. But at the same time, any re the court, I would ask that they e u my lack of formality here. + +MR OLA: We have no problem with ing for lunch at this point so that we r arrange a change of court reporters. + +The only appeals I remember, Your Honor, are the ones I lost. + +THE COURT: Again, thank you for your concerns and your patience as well. + +I also recognize and thank Ms. Musgrave for being here. + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +We will return back at 1:30, so as to give you all some logistic assistance to try to arrange, as you need to, for the court reporter and transcript purposes. + +Keep in mind that we will go to 4:30 today. And also, that I am not available tomorrow. I have several panel commitment for the bench bar tomorrow. And so tha would preclude any further considera do have a full day of hearings well. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Y o Or, before we break, anticipating p tial adverse ruling, I have io to stay the matter, which ately reviewable as well. is the + +h ion to stay that I have I did nticipate this court severing the It was only the adverse ruling of he removal of the case from the trial docket. So I would like to revise that motion. But I would make an ore tenus motion to stay this action in order for Mr. Epstein to file the petition for writ of mandamus as to the order denying the motion + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +MR. SCAROLA: We would clearly object to a stay, Your Honor. It would effectively be granting the same relief that the defense has been unsuccessful in obtaining. + +0 We are confident that Your Hono 's order will withstand appellate . And a petition for writ of mand an expedited proceeding. s e we will hear from the appel rt if they have whats r Yo question the proprietary y ie er that Your Honor has entered. any reason + +T : The motion to stay from Court is denied. + +OMR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I expect what ÷e will deal with after lunch are issues that relate to the most recently disclosed documents, including, in particular, emails. + +THE WITNESS: That's what I anticipate. + +MR. SCAROLA: And I have a timeline, which I provided to opposing counsel. I am + +to remove the case from the trial docket and a petition for writ or certiorari as to the order granting Mr. motion to sever. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scarola. + +1 2 going to hand that to Your Honor in case you want to chew on that over lunch. + +3 4 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, if I may approach. + +5 THE COURT: Sure. + +6 7 8 9 10 MS. ROCKENBACH: I have one submission to the Court. It was hand-delivered yesterday before we received your judic submissions. But it relates to hi issue. assistant's email about no future + +11 12 THE COURT: I can't pr will have time to read u that I + +13 MS. ROCKENBACH e 'S Un OFstood. + +14 THE COURT: do the best I can. + +15 /4" MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you very much. + +16 17 18 THE COUEV Thank you all again for your ex Wer<4;1 be nt presentations and arguments. in recess until 1:30. + +19 + +20 21 A'i tc ...) 4 (The above proceedings were concluded at 12:08 p.m.) + +22 + +23 + +24 + +A + +- - - + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +#### COURT CERTIFICATE + +STATE OF FLORIDA : SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) + +I, SONJA D. , certify that I was authorized to and did stenographically repor foregoing proceedings and that the transc c true record of my stenographic notes + +> Dated this 8th % < CG arch2018. ecy ' PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +MR. SCAROLA: They were added by anew list + +filed on March 5th of 2018. + +THE COURT: Okay. Just:to put this into perspective, March 5th would have been Monday of this week, today being March 8th, and the trial starting on March 13th, presuming it begins as scheduled. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. clear that while the 724 wer- listed on a prior exhibit list befor some of those documents were discl sover the past three weeks. So I am sting to your Honor that the first ne w got of an intent to attempt to use th c nts was March 5. The first notice we g ofj intent to attempt to use some of these tcurrents started some three weeks ago as new 7 disclosures were sent to us. Ihksw) want to make it + +AR And again, this is from memory, but I think there may have been three separate groups of documents that were sent to us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the materials that you have reviewed much attention was focused on documents that we contend and have contended for eight years are privileged documents. + +Documents listed on a very specific privilege log. + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +And those are 45 of the 724 newly-listed do + +And those documents were brought to our t Lion just last week. + +So my suggestion to your Hpnor is that we deal + + first with the procedural issue because, as I said, + + that will narrow issues significantly. And then + + there will still remain some substantive issues + + with regard specificaily to any attempted use of + +privilege als. + +Now, 0 Honor heard from both opposing + +coun at I have accused them of having stolen + +ocuments. I assure your Honor that that's not + +t e case. I have not accused them of having stolen + +the documents. What I have said in repeated + +'4 6 And these documents, if your Honor has had an + +communication is that these are stolen documents. + +opportunity to look at the timeline, were very + +clearly at this point handed over by the bankruptcy + +court to for one purpose and one + +purpose only; and that was to print them out, + +21 stamp them so that they could be turned over for 22 privilege review by theEM Jaffe law firm, 23 including specifically Brad IIIMS + +24 THE COURT: Let me stop you there so we can 25 put this in context. + +> • • • PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES 561-471-2995 + +> > 8 + +1 Joe Ackerman, as I r o , was representing 2 Mr. Epstein for some f time, and he was at 3 .'that juncture as Ait with .the firm 4 in some cap y. + +5 MR. SCAR : Yes, sir. That's correct. + +6 THE COURT: So if I'm understanding this 7 correctly then, the bankruptcy court turned the • . documents over to + +11 12 13 THE COURT: So that I understand. I know during a very tumultuous period of time these would be the Rothstein firm's employee. + +14 15 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. Let me go through this and give you a quick overview, although all + +MR. SCAROLA: Did your Honor want me to get into that now? I'm happy to do that. + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 16 the details are provided in the timeline that I + +17 provided to your Honor. + +18 What happened was that almost immediately 19 following the implosion of the Rothstein, 20 Rosenfeldt, Adler firm a trustee was appointe 21 the bankruptcy court to take control of t 22 and that trustee took control of all firm's 23 files and all of the firm's electr is ata, 24 including all of its e-mail ry s. So it is the 25 trustee that had possess 1 of these + +> i PALM BEACH 1\$§117 iG SERVICES, 61-471-2995 INC. + +\ + +1 + +AS " 2 pstein through counsel, and at this point 3 s the Fowler firm, issued a subpoena in our civil litigation, then pending in front of Judge for the trustee to produce all of the e-mails. Judge Ray, to whom that subpoena was referred, Judge Ray appointed Judge Carney as a 8 special master to make a determination as to what 9 could appropriately be turned over because 10 obviously these were e-mails that related to a wide 11 variety of cases. It was the entire contents of + +9 + +12 the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 13 and it was recognized that those e-mails could 14 contain attorney/client and work product privileged 15 materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special. 16 IIIIII to make a determination as to what sh 17 and could be turned over and report bac 18 Ray. + +19 Judge Carney gets 27,000 e-mai d Judge 20 Carney says, "I don't have alK7Aciation - as to 21 what may be privileged here. We need to come up 22 with a procedure so that I can be advised of what 23 privilege assertions are being raised." So Judge 24 Carney says, "I want what was then the newly-formed 25 law firm that Mr. is working in, I want + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 10 + +1 Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos and Lehrman".-- + +2 THE COURT: Jaffe, right? + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Yes: Jaffe. + +4 THE COURT: We can just refer to them as + +5 + +6 MR. SCAROLA: All right. "I want Jaffe + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 7 to go through these e-mails and prepare a privilege + +8 log. Let me know what's privileged here, and then + +9 I'll make a determination as to what's going to get 10 turned over." + +11 The response from Mr. Edward through me is 12 this is 27,000 e-mails, they want them, th hou d 13 be responsible for printing them and B tes raping 14 them and delivering those printed le!ptes stamped 15 documents to us for our revi nd Judge Ray 16 enters an order. + +17 And Judge Ray s s order -- and it's 18 quoted in relev t the bottom of the first 19 page of thi me e -- Judge Ray says the law 20 firm of a kite will print a hard copy of all 21 the s contained on the disks with 22Il.bers added and will provide a set of copied, 23 s tilly peddocuments to the specialMill and an Ovs to happen at that point was they we o Ke over the ministerial task acers of the court of bearing the ex tturn these documents over to 7a Brad for purposes of prep rtn ivilege log. + +OURT: For lack of a better metaphor, h, wasn't that a fox in ahenhouse type of situation? + +MR. SCAROLA: Well, sir, were these not officers of the court, the answer to that question is yes. These were adversaries who were being given control over these documents, but they were adversaries who had a sworn duty to follow the Court's direction. And we had every reason to + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +12 + +1 believe that this respected law firm and these 2 respected lawyers would do exactly what they were 3 told to do. + +4 Now, we know that the disk that contained that 5 information, as has been conceded lestein's 6 counsel, was formatted on De 10 -- excuse 7 me -- December 8th of 201' + +8 THE COURT: Wh mean by the disk was 9 formatted? + +10 MR. SCAROKA: hat I mean was the documents on 11 that disk were divided into three different 12 categories. + +13 THE COURT: And that was December 10? + +14 4‹; MR. SCAROLA: December 8th of 2010. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +-4 3"7 after being ordered not to retain any copies MR. SCAROLA: So within approximately one week 18 there's a disk that is formatted by 19 which is the disk that is now in the possession of 20 Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's counsel. And 21 it contains without a doubt those documents that we + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22identify on aprivilege log that is generated as a + +23consequence of that process. It contains those 24privileged and attorney work product e-mails. And 25that assertion of privilege has never been + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. Aq0 561-471-2995 • + +1 overruled. + +THE COURT: Did the Spedf:14,4gistrate Carney or Judge Ray ever.hold.a hearing to determine the nature of the privilege? Was that ever called up for a hearing? + +C: O + +7 8 9 0 MR. SCAROLA: What happened, your Honor, is that udge Crbw, when he learned of the circ Chitances of what was going on in bankruptcy communicated to Judge Carney, "This subpoena was issued in my case. While I respect you and the work you are doing, it is my job to decide what is relevant and material in my case and it is my job 13to determine issues of privilege in my case." That 14short circuited the work that was going on in the 15bankruptcy court, and Judge Carney never issued any 16 rulings in that regard. + +13 + +17So it then became a matter over which Judge + +was exercising jurisdiction to determine how the subpoena issued in the Circuit Court State Court case, how that subpoena was going to be responded to. So our privilege log goes to Judge 22 Crow. + +23And there's some back and forth about whether 24the privilege log is or is not ader tt d there 25is adirection with regard to certain requests for + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 56 4 1:449.95 + +( Si 1. documents.o e0 vilege log. Specifically, / there i e est Number 13, which asks for 3comm6:Cat ons between Jaffe and the federal 4vernment and communications between Jaffe 5a d any members of the press. And those are r: t privilege log, and those restrictions have er been lifted. + +20 21 22 23 Now, in some of the communica ons that have gone on back and forth you mayEike seen reference to adisclosure to the Ra ack defendants. .".. Excuse me. The Razo a k aintiffs. + +24 25 THE COURT: Ng wthe litigation led by Mr. Scherer + +4 5 6 . MR. SCAROLA: That is correct. The Conrad Scherer firm was involved in that litigation, and the Conrad Scherer firm was also interested in getting to take alook at whatever relevant e-mails might have been in the hands of the bankruptcy trustee, and then got turned over to us. + +7 8 Well, there were direct negotiations in which Iwas a personal participant with the lawyers for + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session So we have a privilege log in place. It + +0 + +ALM CH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. .561-471-2995 + +15 + +9Conrad Scherer, and an agreement was reached with 10the lawyers for Conrad Scherer because, as we have 11told every judge before whom we have appeared with 12regard to these matters, we're not attempting 13hide anything. You want to conduct an in-14 15 16 inspection, we want you to conduct an inspection because it will confirm ta re not attempting to hide anything. + +17 18 19 20 privilege, you 21 22 23 24protect our work product privilege as well. 25Some of that litigation is still ongoing right now. We will turn over any at you consider appropriate for us to But we have no ability to waive ient's attorney-client clearly con+ formation that originated with clients. And we are in the midst at this point of stilt-pending litigation, and it is important for or, and some of these e-mails + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 16 + +1That's the Crime Victims Rights Act case. + +2So there is avery legitimate reason for us to 3be concerned about protecting both the work product + +4 privilege and the attorney/client privilege, 5 particularly protecting it from Mr. Epstein, and 6 particularly protecting it from Mr. Epstein now 7 that we know there was a clear violation of the 8 federal judge's order with regard to the matte n 9 which these materials were to be handled. + +10 Interestingly -- and I don't know e 11 there's any relationship or not ortly 12 after this disk is improperly ned by • 13 , that withdrawing from 14 the case. So they'r And apparently the 15 disk sits there a until a request is made 16 to turn ove o Fowler files. + +17 An have been told is 18 init or whatever reason, resists that 19 20 7. 4riest, but Mr. Link and associates go down to Miami, they review files, they get their hands on this disk. There is a significant delay between their appearance in the case and when they finally go to look at the files. Then there's 24 a two-week delay between looking at the 25 files and receiving the disk. And then + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 • + +1 2 there's a two-week delay between receiving the disk and starting to -- + +3 THE COURT: Excuse me just a minute. + +4 5 Bailiff, see what may be transpiring outside, please. Pardon me. Off the record. + +6 (Discussion held off the reco + +7 THE COURT: Go ahead. I -'old; + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 MR. SCAROLA: Your Ho r l 7 the overall scheme of things, I do ink that those delays make very much di ce at all. But these are the lawyers wh y ur Honor has noted, announced to the Co r they were going to be ready for trial 0 later, and here it is just weeks befor s case is about to begin that they are reviewing 36 boxes, or over 30 boxes of files. Might have been 31. I think 36 is the number. But boxes of files that never even got reviewed by them. + +19 So those are matters of significant concern to 20 us. But the matter of greatest concern is that 21 once it becomes apparent that these are documents 22 that are listed on our privilege log, a privilege 23 that has never been challenged, a privilege that + +24 remains in place, and we notify opposing counsel 25 here is our privilege log, here are the numbers, + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 the I'll' numbers of these documents o 2 privilege log, you have an obligat n. ethical 3 obligation, to turnithem over to turn them 4 over now, and to make no ose documents 5 unless and until yo a ourt order that says 6 otherwise. You ell us where did you get 7 them, when you. et them, how did you get them, 8 to who a distributed them? And those are 9 ques ionsi at we still don't have answered. + +• :s 10 1,I4,10"What we get from the other side is, "Well, 11 they could have come from here, they could have come from there, maybe they came from someplace else, we don't know." And if they don't know where they came from and that source is clearly a proper 15 source, they have the burden in overcoming this 16 privilege assertion to prove a waiver if they 17 contend any waiver existed. + +18 It wasn't with regard to Conrad Scherer + +10 11 12 4 And then they contacted us back again and 5 said, "We're trying to OCR all of these documents 6 hat they are searchable, and we can't do that with the watermark on them. Can you please provide us with another copy without a watermark?" And we did that; again, trusting these officers of the court to abide by their agreement. And we have every reason to believe that Conrad Scherer did. They were not the source. + +13 14 The obvious source, based now upon what we have been able to piece together, is very clearly + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 19 because when those documents were turned over to + +20 Conrad Scherer -- and we have the letters that 21 confirm the written agreement with every detail of 22 that agreement in place -- those were turned over 23 as part of a common interest privilege with an 24 express representation it was attorneys' eyes only, 25 with an express representation they wV turned + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SE INC. 561-471-2 + +1 over to no one. 2 to Conrad Sche Tlith c y were originally turned over they got turned over 3 with a confidentiality watermark on every document. + +19 + +15 IIIIII White's improper retention of this material 16 after they had been expressly ordered by the 17 federal court not to retain any of it. + +18 Now, every representation I have made to the 19 Court, everything that is included on this timeline 20 can be established through documents that pinpoint 21 the dates and the identity of the individuals 22 involved and the character of every disclosure that 23 was made and every disclosure that was withheld. 24 It has taken a substantial effort to put all of . 25 this together again. We have been working on this + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 • + +1 .many, many hours. But the subject of 2 appropriate sanctions is a subject for another day 0 except to this extent: We need to know who has +8 material. We need to know if there's some intent access, who has had access to this confidential 6 7 8 to call a witness who may have been given access to this confidential material. We need to know all of the lawyers involved. + +9 And Mr. Cassell is going to address from the + +20 + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 10 perspective of the clients the concern that they + +11 have about being informed as to how their 12 confidences have been breached. So with your 13 Honor's permission, I would like him to have an 14 opportunity to address the Court briefly on that 15 topic. + +16 THE COURT: What I'd like to do, 7khough, is 17 allow defense counsel to be able to speak to the 18 threshold Binger analysis dealing with the late 19 disclosure, because if Mr. Scarola is right and 20 that is that these exhibits were listed for the 21 first time in March, which would have been three 22 days ago, apd discussed perhaps within the last few 23 weeks, ttlep we would have essentially a Binger 24 issue to analyze. So Miss Rockenbach, go ahead and 25 proceed in that respect, please. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 21 + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, your Honor. I am 2 certain that this courtroom is a place where we are 3 searching for truth and not hiding evidence, 4 whether it is evidence that causes conclusion by 5 this Court that there is no case to be tried. And + +6 for the first time after four days of -- and we use 7 that word -- + +8 SCAROLA: Excuse me. I'm sorry. If this 9 is one of the privileged e-mails, and I assume it 10 probably is, your Honor has entered an order 11 sealing these documents, and the press is present. 12 It is being displayed prominently i violation of 13 ethical obligations to relinquish .p ssession of 14 these documents. + +15 16 in open court , why 17 18 document, makin THE COURT: All r illSt. y lieu of publication y u just hand me the hat counsel also has the copy or is referenced with the correct Bates stamp. + +19 20 21 MS. ROCKENBACH: This is the stamp e-mail 04408; an e-mail from to Cassell, October 17, 2009. + +22 THE COURT: Okay. Is this an extra copy? + +MR. SCAROLA: Do we have an extra copy; please? There are literally thousands of e-mails 25 we're dealing with. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. • 561-471-2995 + +1 MR. LINK: It's in the appendix that we've 2 provided you. + +3 THE COURT: I'm familiar with it from reading 4 the materials myself and I could probably put my 5 hands on it. + +6 MR. LINK: It's in the appendix, yoq nor 7 Appendix 1. + +( .4.4) + +8 MR. VITALE: 'MEM C + +. II TERRY: 04408. + +,1 10 MS. ROCKENBACH: Th 'S1at Thank you. + +11 THE COURT: An t, too. I can get my 12 hands on it pre I think. + +13 MR. C L: four Honor, if I could just be 14 heard j dtsbr fly. + +15 COURT: Go ahead and introduce yourself to 16 ur new court reporter. + +17 MR. CASSELL: Paul Cassell on behalf of three 44(S v victims, LM, EW and Jane Doe. + +0 We'd like the record to be clear that we're '4 243 joining in the objection to any public disclosure 21 or reference to these documents. + +22 THE COURT: Well, reference and public 23 disclosure are two different things, Mr. Cassell. + +24 MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry. Any disclosure of + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 25 the contents or the substance of these documents. + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +23 + +6 7 • 8 my hands on -- THE COURT: All right. Thank you for that clarification. So let me go ahead and try and put + +1 THE COURT: Outside of the Court's reviet49 + +2 Are you objecting to my review? + +3 MR. CASSELL: No. We're not w 4 privileges, but we don't want there`o\_bie any 5 public reference to the contents. + +9 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, I can give you 10 the copy that Terry noted was 04408. I don't need 11 it. + +12. E COURT: Okay, that's fine. + +13 ^ MS. ROCKENBACH: The purpose of me putting this particular piece of evidence, which I've been asked on multiple occasions by Mr. Scarola to 16 destroy by the barrage of e-mails over the past 17 four days, I'm handing it to the Court as evidence 18 of no Binger surprise. It can't be Binger surprise 19 by Mr. if he is authoring an e-mail with 20 regard to this very action that's pending before + +21 this Court about five to six weeks before 22 Mr. Epstein sued him. So that can't be a surprise 23 to Mr. Edwards. It actually makes this case 24 incredibly stronger for the issue of probable 25 cause. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 24 + +1 But more importantl onor, it's about 2 the truth. It's abo tt uth and the fact that 3 over the past PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995: + +> > 27 + +1 These e-mails, your Honor, go to the very 2 heart of this malicious prosecution case and Page 31 + +3 whether it can proceed. + +4 But returning to Mr. Chinaris, he had three 5 opinions after reviewing the relevant documents, 6 speaking to both Mr. Link and myself, based on he 7 escalating accusations over the course of 8 days. And his three opinions are refl 9 paragraphs 29, 30 and 31. + +10 Mr. Link and Miss Rockenb• h h acted in an 11 ethically proper manner. 12 two, the documents in were not 13 14 Mr. Link and M one. Number inadvertently prov\* nor wrongfully obtained by 4Stoc venbach + +15 16 17 18 19 MR. is golcg i rega the ethical propriety of opposing el's conduct, I object to this affidavit as hearsay and I want to be able to cross-examine any i. ethics expert who is of the opinion that retaining \$ it privileged documents known to be privileged listed 22 on a privilege log when there is no knowledge as to 23 the source of those documents and a court order 24 exists saying you're not allowed to have them, I 25 want to cross-examine that expert. Excuse me. Your Honor, if this rn into an evidentiary hearing with + +4 conduct the proceedings in a way that 5 1. THE COURT: Well, the objection is sustained 2 in the sense that I really do want to, as I indicated earlier, continue to as best as an S known integrity of not only the attprney~s ere e 6 before us but also the historyRll has been 7 pervasive in the 15th Jud i cuit. So I don't 8 want this to dissolv ethical discussion as 9 to whether or committed some type of 10 ethical vio on. hat's really not my focus 11 today. t t focus is better suited for others 12 perh a#76 different time and even perhaps in a 13 1 fferent forum. + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +28 + +14 :'414I Really what has to be attempted to be divined today is some type of representation by counsel for Mr. Epstein as to what the source of these 17 documents were. + +18 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, your Honor. + +19 THE COURT: Why were they preserved, how were 20 they preserved, for what reason were they 21 preserved, did that preservation violate or come + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22 close to violating an order of the bankruptcy + +23 court, has the privilege been waived? And then we 24 get back again to the Binger analysis. + +25 I did a quick word search, and the Fifth + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +29 + +1 District provides us with some rec t direction and 2 assistance and talks about e of surprise. + +3 And it says, quote, "T o o ng party also 4 earlier attempted o lu e the surprise testimony + +5 by an unsucces mo on in limine. Furthermore, + +6 prejudice ontext of Binger refers to the + +7 surpr ct of the objecting party and is not + +8 depe en upon the adverse nature of the + +9 mony." So that's where we are also going to be 10 focusing today. + +But I don't want to get into a discussion as to present counsel's ethical responsibilities + +13 unless we have to as it relates to the origin of + +14 how, if counsel is aware, these documents inclusive + +15 of the e-mails, and particularly as it relates to + +16 the 724 allegedly new exhibits being added formally + +17 for the first time on March 5th, just three days + +18 ago, and certainly outside of the Court's pretrial 19 order in terms of timeliness, whether they 20 constitute prejudice. So let's try to focus there, 21 if we could. + +22 And I understand, just so the record is 23 doing this for a long time both as a tr 24 and as a judge, I understand how fe 25 hurt, I understand how people can to e timbrage at be + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561 7 =Iips + +1 , .certain thi SS.: said. + +. I. + +2 Th of being an experienced trial 3 judg if nothing else,'.is developing a thick skin. t imes I'll hear people say something and use my name and they don't even know I'm standing there. + +30 + +MR. LINK: That wasn't me, was it, Judge? + +THE COURT: No. And I understand that there are going to be instances where people are going to 9 think that I'm the best in the world and the 10 absolute worst in the universe. I've come to that 11 rationale pretty quickly. It took some time, but 12 it was fairly quickly. But I do understand. I + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 13 don't want anyone to think that I'm not + +14 compassionate to the extent that I recognize that + +15 there have been accusations hurled here which may + +16 be minimally considered offensive and accusatory. + +17 But let's move beyond that for now and let's get to + +18 some of the issues that I discussed earlier that we + +19 can focus on relating to decisions that I'll have + +20 to make concerning the potential atibility of + +21 this evidence. + +22 MS. ROCKENBACH: The p your Honor. I + +23 appreciate that. + +24 + +25 + +AsAStsit, And we N 5 .. shed the chain of custody + +I I through the ida t of Tina from our + +AORINvoir + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +office. So it is clear we did not improperly obtain them, nor were they inadvertently disclosed to us. + +THE COURT: Tina is your paralegal? + +5 MS. ROCKENBACH: Who obtained the three boxes, 6 the three boxes from which contained 7 that CD which is at issue. + +8 THE COURT: I think the disconnect we're + +31 + +9having here today is not so much the fact that 10Miss received the boxes or somebody got 11 notice that the boxes were there + +12MS. ROCKENBACH: It was an issue. + +13THE COURT: -- and that somebody did wh . , 14did. And there may have been an issue 15 16Those are things that can be dealt later on. 17And again, it may be adiffer fprum than 18 even dealing with here to voluntarily turning I'm + +19But what I'd k to know is how • 20 got the docume 21 or not th onl do we to know that, whether ntation was obtained or retained 22in amann 11at either was in violation of Judge 23 24 Ray's order or walked acertain tightrope that '1 could be construed as aconstructive violation of that order. And if we know that, then it would go + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 32 + +1a long way in me trying to make adetermination as 2 it relates to Binger and its progeny. + +3 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. + +24 always been a general category, as Mr. Scarola + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +4THE COURT: So that's really where we need to 5 focus. + +6 Ihave no problem and I don't think + +7 Mr. Scarola has any problem in terms of the fact + +8 that you all did your homework; albeit, fromikik + +9position, late in the game, and secured t era + +10 information from The c + +11question, though, is why did Fowle Whi ehave + +12these documents, why were th tinued to be + +13held, and was it in viol her expressly or + +14constructively as i to Judge Ray's order? + +15MS. ROCKENX ank you, your Honor. + +16Mr. Link ha ucbid this issue and will address + +17 that. + +18K: So, Judge, let me see if I can + +19 acouple of things. + +r fY C 20First, these exhibits that we're talking about + +I was not going to allow general catchall types of exhiftidentification, I required that each and exhibit be specifically listed. And we've gone through myriad exhibits in our quest to determine whether or not, for example, the Fifth Amendment privilege is going to be recognized and other issues having to do with admissibility. And that was generally followed, to my recollection, because I dealt with many specifically identifiable exhibits. So yes, I agree that that was something that the Court had a specific interest in and has + +24always taken the position that all cards are going 25to be on the table in atimely fashion so that, + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 number one, first and 2 are on the table, the 3may come to fruition, foremost once a ards law favors s the ent, and it and ha often than not 4resulted in an amicable to a case. And eadequately prepared as importantly, bot 6 so that, as I 7 one is undu 8 before 7urp S1H. 814Csed by rnear the nthis Pollard case, no something that comes beginning of trial. + +Ahliftc + +Ac10;" 34 + +9MR. I1UK: Yes, sir. 10at. So that is why we did + +11The second thing Iwant to point out to the 15THE COURT: Well, if you're not complaining 16 about it -- + +17MR. LINK: The reason I want to explain is 18because in our pretrial stip I'm of the mindset + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session when we reach agreement, we have an agreement. And in our agreement, your court order says no additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In the pretrial stip Mr. Scarola and I agreed we reserved our right to add additional exhibits. o in compliance with the pretrial stip and t Courts' order requiring us to identify 've + +10 THE COURT: That metaphor, I'm not sure I understand clear as mud. + +11 12 13 14 MR. LINK: It's not clear. That's the point. It's not clear, frankly. So it is not as simple and clear as Mr. Scarola says. And I want to show you why. + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SER 561-47T-29 + +35 + +been doing that,•s . !.% + +THE COURT + +AR: Awe- are not in violation of the Cour dot Mr. Scarola and I again agreed to + +So let's talk about because it is as clear as mud. It is not as clear as Mr. Scarola . . says. Here is why. If you look at his -- + +I can't. We have looked for every piece of communication, correspondence, we've gone through their boxes three times trying to answer th question. We have reached out to lawy 17 18 19 20 + +MM. 0 They have no memory So we, ( L ) 21 22 like Mr. Scarola -- + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +15 I honestly cannot tell you, I can't, where the 16 disk came from that end up in la file. + +23 THE COURT: Excuse me 24 actively practicing? . Ackerman still + +25 MR. LINK: H .Ss 4 e And we reached out to + +> \-7 PALM Ef g srCH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +C; + +1 e Ackerman. Mr. Ackerman. Sorry. We reached 2 , o.t to Mr. Ackerman. + +Here is why it's confusing. And I think this A4P is really important to understand what happened. + +When the trustee took over the files, there 6 was an understanding by Mr. and his firm 7 that there would be about 5,000 e-mails, and they 8 agreed to do a -- go through them and do a 9 privilege log. What's missing from Mr. Scarola's + +36 + +10 timeline is that in November 2010 informed 11 the bankruptcy court that the trustee had produced 12 74,000, 74,000 pages of documents on two compact disks. Not one. On two. 13 + +So then what happened, because of the vol Mr. and his firm goes in and says, dge 14 15 16 17 18 we need more time. We did not know we g to get 74,000 pieces of paper and wE neeJd time to go through them." + +19 20 THE COURT: I may ha fPyou. The 74,000 pages were self-gene 1 d 6m the Rothstein firm? + +21 22 NO ASs., MR. LINK. A delivered to Mr. Edwa by the trustee + +23 24 25 i • .! TH And Mr. , you're sugg indicated that they need more time to iew the e-mails or whatever documents -- + +7 V + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +MR. LINK: Correct. + +2 THE COURT: -- they may have encompassed, and 3 to raise objections; and that forum was the 4 bankruptcy court. + +5 MR. LINK: All this started in the bankruptcy + +37 + +6 court. + +7 So when Mr. Scarola says there was one disk 8 produced by the trustee with 27,000 e-mails on it, 9 that's not true. There are two disks and theres 10 74,000 e-mails. That's what Mr. 11 represented to the Court. I haven't seen these 12 disks, but that's what Mr. represented. + +13 So what happens after tha s there is a 14 complicated negotiation be 15 firm and Mr. a, e of the Jaffe 16 firm, about how , ar going to take these 17 documents, whi e of 18 stamped, n y wanted a hard copy to review so 19 they ou n e a privilege log, but they didn't 20 want p,pay for it. The trustee didn't want to pay 21 stamped, not + +22 Mr. Epstein volunteered with the special + +-- actually, -- but + +Mr. Epstein's counsel volunteered that they would 25 use their machine to print out, print out from the + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +15 12 They print t QuE Hard copy documents. 13 One to the tee, one to •• 14 magistr magitaylets two disks: one with 25,000 images 16 "j .t p.. and one with -- I can't tell you how many 17 images because the special look at it." Jaffe. The a copy, and so you will see the says, "I didn't + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +disk that had no stamps on them, documents, 2 and Mr. MR agreed to that. + +3 So they print the documents out -- long before 4 our time, Judge -- they print the documents out, a 5 set is given back to the trustee, and a set is 6 given tont Jaffe. The machine that s 7 according to the magistrate and all 8 communications, doesn't retain any ag So we 9 10 start with two disks. To IliViore complicated, there was three. One had em. But let's go 11 with two disks and 7 ages. + +20 I think -- this is Scott Link guessing -- I want to be clear about this -- I think the disk 21 that ends up at was the special 22 disk. And here is why I think that: A, 23 it was in a file that said Special 24 none of which makes sense to me until we put this + +16 THE COURT: And that disk, I presume, that you're alluding to did have numbers on them. I'm talking about the individual documents. + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +39 + +1 says to him, "You, special a, review se 2 documents." Just like he said here, h t ten The tr il s' cold. 3 times, "We have nothing to hide. Ce i e what 4 should be turned over." 5 can't find a letter or c on from the 6 special that sa ooked. Here they 7 are." But I know e disk that was sent to 8 NM= t4ppy Xad no IIIII stamp. + +9 When at the judge's order from Judge 10 Ray carola pointed out, it says IIIIII Whit t print a hard copy of all the documents 12 fined on the disk with numbers added. 11 13 That's how they were going to do it. + +17 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. They're all 18 stamped. So they were not the disks 19 provided -- again, I can't say they're not. I'm 20 not testifying. This is Scott Link's forensic + +21 review. + +22THE COURT: But again, Mr. Link, + +23respectfully -- and I appreciate you're trying to 24put together and piece together something that 25transpired seven years ago -- the problem sti + +4 + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, 561-471-2995 , + +1 remains the same. eclsn't really + +2 matter to this Court f at it was, who + +3 formatted it orciirty t was supposed to be + +4 intended. sur, here may be cases even after + +5this Woi4ey SJe that we'll be talking about. + +6tomo length at the bar conference, but that + +40 + +7use stands for the proposition globally of the + +84e4c attorney/client privilege to something so + +sanctity in that particular case of the + +rudimentary as whether or not an attorney referred + +aclient to a given doctor for treatment. And the + +12Supreme Court has clearly stated that information + +13is privileged and will not be divulged. + +14MR. LINK: Yes, sir. I was just trying to + +15answer your question about the disk. + +16THE COURT: Okay. So the point that I'm + +trying to make is when I'm saying it really doesn't matter, all of those other details, what matters to the Court is, again, Judge Ray's order relative to the sanctity of those documents, for lack of better term, the protection of those docu sa all costs, and that shal h the threat of sanctions retain any of IC )documents. + +24It says here, "Should i etenmined that 25or Epstein" t only does it go + +> PALM BEACH, ilt ,8q7\ 2:::VICES, INC. -4 1- + +> > 14c + +1 .2 3ds to Mr. Epstein's legal representatives, from this Court's interpretation. to F . rh e but it goes to Epstein -- and cons tively, if not explicitly, by this order + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: "Should it be determined that + +or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of , Brad or his client," end quote. + +'Somme + +41 + +MR. LINK: And I agree with that. The bankruptcy court reserved that. What I'm suggesting to the Court is I don't think it's as clear as Mr. Scarola said. And he may go to Judge Ray and Judge Ray will have a hearing. Base what we've looked at, I don't believe i ' clear that that's what they did because i ble, based upon what I've read -- + +20 THE COURT: That = 1/il1 kt) did? + +21 MR. LINK: Yes. + +X/41-Sir 22 THE COURT: 23that -- so that I'm understanding correctly -- Sq are you suggesting to me + +24 25 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. I'm not here representing Fowler + +3 4 5 6 THE COURT: I understand. But you're here representing Mr. Epstein, who by virtue of this order that is being highlighted in part on the ELMO, that did what it was supposed to do pursuant to that order, returned everything that it was supposed to return, but through some + +• ' ' PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. • 561-471-2995 + +42 + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session happenstance had the disk containing the very + +information that was the source of Judge Ray's order and somehow, therefore, should be exonerated by virtue of the fact that because we really don't know how may have gotten it, bu assuming did what it should do e, miraculously this disk turns up in Fo e's files and hence we should essentia y ignore the dictates of the order? + +MR. LINK: No, sir. the Court. Let me g''' S 7you understand what's on this disk. sink I've confused + +The 27 pa son this disk, we've only looked 0 of them, okay? Of those 5,000, I will represent to you -- and you can look at t-- (S )e attached -- were communications between an 4 v Idon't believe any -- and I know none that attorney and a client. + +Iasked Mr. Cassell and I asked Mr. Scarola to + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +identify by number if there are any attorney/client communications and we would + +3 segregate them. The response I got, every page is 4 an attorney/client communication. So that's one. + +5 THE COURT: But that's not what this order 6 says, Mr. Link. The order doesn't say anything about privileged documents. + +MR. LINK: Judge, I understand tha + +THE COURT: The order says that- hite will not retain any copies of the d uments contained on the disk prov .jt nor shall any images or copies of sai is be retained in the memory of Fowl s copies. And we already went t h fie sanctions. 9 10 11 12 13 14 + +15 16 discoC don't know as we sit here that the 17 18 22 23 24 MR. But we don't know -- here is the disk we located there wasn't handed to them by Special Carney after Mr. Scarola gave him the job and said look at it and give them whatever you think is okay because the majority of the documents we've looked at have to deal with scheduling and sporting events and going out drinking and all kinds of things. It is not a group of documents that are on the privilege log. + +25 Here is the second thing we learned -- + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +THE COURT: And is that going to serve as the conduit to attempt to admit these documents into evidence in the face of the order that I have just read? + +MR. LINK: Your Honor, I see Mt,rder. What I'm trying to get across -- Q ing a lousy job. + +THE COURT: No, you' + +MR. LINK: can't tell you. + +THE COURT: r to get to the point that I'm really -- + +MR L . I don't think that we can conclude toda this disk is aresult of their violating is order. This disk could have been as a result the special looking at it and saying, "I 'ae37(118":2 don't see communications between attorney/client, I based on giving it to Razorback, issue injection, believe there's been awaiver of the work product all of these issues have been raised." + +THE COURT: So now you're suggesting that former Judge Carney, to my knowledge avery well - respected jurist who presided in the Circuit Court + +13 14 15 When these issues came up, we asked to please give us the original boxes. We got the original boxes and found the disk in a folder that says J. Carney printing on it. That's it. That's all that's on this folder. + +16 17 There's no watermarks, there's no confidentiality agreement, there's no stamps on the + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22 in Broward County, to my knowledge, and has done + +23 senior work here in the 15th Judicial Circuit 24 somehow engaged in some type of ex parte 25 communications with + +# PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. cIRAl4sv • 561,471-2995 + +• ; ( /14O 45 + +1 MR. LINK: Judge, I can't becalke -Lie looked. 2 I have searched. I'm not saying that at all. All 3 I can piece together is that Mr. Scarola asked 4 Special Carney to do that. + +5 This disk, when we got -- we put a sticker on 6 it. We wgn looked at boxes and put stickers 7 on things the disk said Epstein stamp. Had 8 no idea what was on it. Looked like something we 9 d put a sticker on. It came in, the disk, and 0 we started looking at it. + +documents. They are stamped and there's a disk in there. So what I'm suggesting is if we're trying to figure out whether violated the order, I don't think it's as clear as Mr. Scarola says. + +Now, I wasn't there. I can't tel they did, Judge. But I do know th 5. of the documents that are on this disk an t are on + +> CS ) PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 56;'471=2995 + +their privi ( Slo -S/ have been used in this litigat n have been used. They have prod ced e. They're exhibits that Mr. • IKLsked Xijilege log. There's over a hundred of them. about and answered that are on this + + A; O So this disk is not adisk of their privileged documents. It's a disk of 27,500 documents. And what's the most important part of this is Judge never held an in-camera. Nobody judicially has looked at these. And that's where we need to be. + +I don't think any of this matters. What + +13 matters is we have the records, they're relevant, 14 this Court should determine they're relevant, see 15 if there's a privilege and see if that privilege 16 has been waived. That should be the process. + +17 THE COURT: On Thursday afternoon, which i 18 going to be taken up by additional argumen her 19 Friday I'm a committed member to the B , as 20 is encouraged not only by the 15th iclya Circuit 21 and Fourth District Court of p but also by our 22 local Bar Association, of y of you are 23 prominent members he know that commitment 24 must be taken s and I do take it 25 seriously, ti the riday I'm booked up with + +> ALM1 ACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +5 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +6 7 8 THE COURT: That's a big endeavor. That is an endeavor that is beyond this Court's ability physically and from a time perspective. So I'm not + +47 + +hearings on other matters of the 14- to 15 hundred files that I'm carrying in this division, of which this is but one, with the trial to commence on the morning of Tuesday, the 13th of March. + +9 going to do that. + +10 11 12 :Milli. They don't want to. MR. LINK: Your Honor, I know that you don't have the time. I have offered them aspecial + +13 THE COURT: It's just too late. + +14MR. LINK: But Judge, the truth i 15 late. too + +16 THE COURT: Please don't inter pece. + +17 MR. LINK: I apologize for that. + +18 19 20 21 THE COURT: Protocol dictates the orderly administration of justice and, correspondingly, the orderly preparation for trial. That preparation - and you'll'be surprised when it comes to larger • 22cases like this -- not only applies to counsel and 23their team of attorneys that the respective side 24Ire, but it also applies to the singular ?S e 25individual who is responsible for this orderly + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 48 + +1 presentation. + +2I often refer to a case that I printed 3directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, + +4 R3 Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it + +5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate responsibility. There it was to ensure appropriate 7 attorney behavior, but it talks also about court 8 exercising its control of the litigation of the , 9 trial, of important pretrial hearings like re 10 having here today, and talks about th 11 , especially true in lengthy high-sta es.c ses and 12 goes on to speak about what a T should and 13 should not tolerate when to interruptions 14 and other matters th necessarily befit the 15 presentation of dIIWi# excellent counsel. + +16 But wh wa rying to communicate while we 17 were sp k er each other is that this is the 18 very courts have spoken to the issue of 19 4lely and reasonableness and preparation. + +20 I can't speak to the . , matter in which this case has been prepared by counsel for Mr. Epstein over the last 3,000 and some odd days. I can, however, 23 speak to what is before me now. Why someone before 24 you and Miss Rockenbach got involved in this 25 case -- because I saw Mr. Ackerman's name in this + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 matter in the four years that I've been presiding 2 over this case -- I saw his involvement, I saw what 3 he attempted to do. His timing was critical -- 4 whether his work was or wasn't is not for 5 say, but certainly his time in which h elf i 6 representing Mr. Epstein would hay itical 7 .to any successor counsel's invo veal in this 8 case. + +9 10 decision-making thk here in the civil circuit 11 courtroom I had 12 significa at of experience in a relatively 13 quic t f time. It was baptism by fire, I 14 thin would call it. But I had opportunities 15 t into the courtroom long before others did 16 w o had the same experience level. Whether that was good or bad, the results speak for themselves. But I did have that opportunity. And to learn a 19 great deal, not so much from those who I work with, 20 but even more those who I work against, so to 21 speak; my opposing counsel. The wealth of 22 knowledge that I gained from how they did their Thankfully, for es of most of the experience, and I gained a 23 work was astounding and something that I cherish + +24even to this day. But what it taught me more than 25anything was that preparation is critical, whether + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1.' the case is a \$10,000 .whiplash case or 2a \$10 million class action suit. s + +And the very essence of being brought to my attention today, wests are made for 5 6 commencemen aspecial to review thousan cuments several days before the in-camera inspection adime that's essentially two to three busRe d s prior to the of trial for the first time, despite alcitrance from , their -- somebody 1 reviewing their files apparently for the first time mere weeks before the case is going to court, those types of things have to be held -- I was going to say in high regard, but what was meant by. what I'm saying is preparation in getting to these materials, there was nothing that I knew of despite again what appears to be brief recalcitrance on the part of to turn over the materials + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 19themselves, this could have been done six months + +20 21 22 23 24 ago, a year ago, two years ago, three years ago, four years ago, five years ago, six years ago, and it should have been done then. To bring these types of matters before the Court at this particular time is, in my view, inappropri . It v + +25 Now, if this was newly-discovere ce + +3. 2 3 4 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 that was not in UN: C(ds of Mr. Epstein's lawyers since 2009, whenever this all came to fruition, then I wo 'd have to take adifferent approath. BjIt the very nature of the documents l that we're talking about -- again, rightly or ly held -- were in fact held by INS Epstein's counsel, at an incredible crucial time in this process; and that being in and around 2010, when the Rothstein firm imploded, when these e-mails were apparently confiscated, when somebody made the decision that instead of paying for the copy costs, they be handed over to . And if I have abit of an incredulous tone to that statement, it's probably purposeful. + +C PALM BEACH REPORTING SE VIC INC. 561-471-2 5 + +jcii + +51 + +15 But the fact remains, Mr. Link, that these 16 materials were in the hands of Epstein's attorneys 17 from the inception of the issue itself. And to now 18 come to the Court with not five pages of documents 19 to look at, but 27,000, or whatever that number 20 is -- it escapes me because of its shear mass -- is 21 impossible and is not going to be countenanced 22 here. + +23 And I understand what you're going to tell me 24 because I've gotten a flavor for some of these 25 documents that have been provided. + +> PALM BEA40 REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 52 + +1 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +X s 2 THE COURT: And that is that they are y ..detrimental to the position taken by Mr. and that they are helpful to the position taken by Mr. Epstein. + +6 The issue, though, is one of whether the 7 protocol and the orderly administration of justice 8 is going to be forsaken notwithstanding also the 9 aspect of privilege and the sanctity of privileged + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 10 communications, whether all of those considerations + +11 12 13 14 one, am not going to sacrifice protocol over h t 15 may or may not be, number one, privilege' d i 16 not privileged, certainly late disclo 17 documentation of a massive nature. are going to be thrown out when balanced against material that has been in the hands of Mr. Epstein's lawyers from day one. And I, for + +18 Should the amount of d ation be a 19 determinative factor in s analysis in this 20 context, based upon 3'':Nrs of compound 21 experience, bench and bar, and a little bit more 22 now than half on the bench, I do not believe that 23 24 25 the orderly administration countenanced and should be disruptive. of justice should be disruptive. Should be + +2 3 4 5 And what I meant by that, should the destruction of the orderly administration of justice be countenanced? And the answer to that question, in my respectful view, is no. Because if I do it once, then I'm setting a precedent, even + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +53 + +though I know trial courts traditionally don't do that, according to case law. And forgive me for my choice of words, but as someone who is asenior member now of the bench -- not asenior judge, but message to my colleagues that I'm not d believe is the appropriate thing. asenior member of the bench -- that sends a4'., + +MR. LINK: May I respond, ur udr? + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. LINK: First I'want to apologize. I did not mean to interrupt the Court when you were speaking. + +THE COURT: Not at all. Go ahead. + +. LINK: Second, we're not talking about 27, ges, we're talking about 49 exhibits. e are only 49 exhibits that we are asking the Court to look at. So that it is not 27,000 pages. + +Third, I think most importantly I absolutely agree your Honor has a difficult, difficult weighing decision to make between staying on course + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. . 561-471-2995 + +and what I think is more important than any of + +this, which is getting to the truth. And I believe + +in my heart, your Honor, the reason I'm so + +passionate about this and the reason I apologize + +for interrupting you is if this courtroom is + +looking for the truth, then those 49 docu sh ye + +got to come into court. They have go i + +front of the jury. + +C.) THE COURT: But they'r oming in here, + +and I would hope elsewhe 's going to be at + +the sacrifice not oC s the orderly + +administration jiftt e, but also in derogation + +of afedera nkr tcy court's order or any court + +of reco i risdiction's order that would have + +the eces ysupervisionary control of agiven + +se, but also at the potential extermination or + + ecsv erogation of a privilege. And for all of those + + taking these things into consideration just a few + +reasons is why I am extremely reluctant to start + +days prior to trial. + +Again, if this was something that came into + +play that was being hidden by the other side, and + +I'm talking now generically, and your side + +discovered that information at the 11th hour, this + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +55 .1 that's one of the things I want to emphasize 2 this record. But that's not the case. 3 As I mentioned• and this is time 4 5 possession of Mr. Epstein fro inception of I'll say it -- these documents have een in the 6 this case as we know i didn't move. And 7 the problems that ent in this analysis, of 8 which this Cou does not have the time to • 9 address ppj thial, are all of those reasons • 10 that st described to you: The disruption derly administration of justice, the sanct nature of the privilege, and of even .• more importance is what I said I wouldn't repeat; and that is, that at all times material to the 16 17 the abject untimeliness of the request for the 18 Court now to take these matters into consideration, 19 where they are well beyond when exhibits that were 20 known or should have been known were not listed. analysis, from the inception Epstein lawyers had this material. And, obviously, the timeliness, or + +21 22 23 MR. LINK: Your Honor, may I have one more shot, please? I know you have been very patient with me. + +24 25 THE COURT: If it's going to be any differ nt than what you've told me. If it's going to + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES 561-471-2995 + +> > 56 + +1same, we've already esta e and it's amatter 2 of record, and I ruling accordingly. + +3MR. LINK; 4i s, siW. I understand that. I'll 4 be very qui + +5Yo 'about whether there was any hiding 6of t ese uments. And one thing Iwant the Court 7 IIIIV see is this: These are -- Mr. Scarola didn't 8want me to put that up on the screen, so I'll hand ec it to you. + +° If you look at the privilege log which they filed, which Judge IIII found inadequate -- and I don't believe there was another privilege log filed, so I don't think there's aprivilege log -- but that's another day, another issue -- but if you look at the privilege log and the e-mails that it + +16 relates to, tell me if a lawyer looking at that 17 18 19 20 21 would be able to tell the real content of the e-mails that Mr. was writing. Because I think you have an obligation to disclose in a way that allows a lawyer to make a determination of) Ahm, whether it's privileged or not. + +22 23 24 25 i THE COURT: Mr. Link, you're maki S p nt for me. Mr. Ackerman, h se c materials ever since day one. n't know how much more I can make this k' r. + +#### • PALM BEACH,R£PORmTI SERVICES, INC. • , • . + +1 ,the analysis would be completely 2 diff t if it was shown to me that somehow, some he Searcy, .Denney firm, Mr. 7 8 9 trying to drive home and emphasize. Is not only 10 the issue of timeliness, not only the issue of the 11 privilege has not been tested, but first and , Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I don't want to get him confused with the wellrespected coach and former coach of the Heat -- Scott Rothstein was sitting on this stuff. That's not what happened here. That's the point that I'm + +57 + +12foremost is the fact that tig Epstein's 13own lawyers, have been sitting on this from day one 14for seven, eight years. + +15MR. LINK: But we don't know -- the point 16trying to make, I don't know that they loo 17 it. + +18THE COURT: That's not my probltM. + +19 20 said, "Don't look." MR. LINK: Maybe Carney gave if them and + +21 THE COURT: That's not my problem. If + +22Mr. Epstein has a case against his attorneys, he 23 can deal with those claims to his satisfaction. + +24 25 I'm not here.to determine whether or not someone did or did not commit malpractice. + +3 4 5 6 THE COURT: I'm here only to deal with this issue that is before me; and that is, whether a wholesale late disclosure of significant exhibits that have been in the possession of Epstein's attorneys, from day one and, thus, as a + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +MR. LINK: I understand that, Judge. + +58 + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 7 matter of continuum in Epstein's possession, his + +8 possession is constructive to the possession of the 9 attorneys that 10 attorneys that 11 2010, and that 12 13 understood is beyond me, as not onl ya a represented him, that string of have been representing him since Alk if nobody got around to looking la documents -- and how that c be 14 attorney but also now a seasoned juke until you 15 and Miss Rockenbach took it u on rselves and 16 your paralegal to do it ie t to problem. And 17 that's all I'll say h. ilbject. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 I have mad g. It is a several- • pronged rulings An for the reasons that I've stated reason why I am not going to enga me type of a last-minute evaluation of uments that could have been evaluated from 2010 Va 1I\* theway to March of 2018. + +But nobody ever took it upon themselves to even look at those documents in + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 59 + +1 file. How that could be the case, who knows? But 2 I'm not finding fault with anything you or + +3 Miss Rockenbach or Miss MIEdid. That's not 4 the issue. You've done your job. + +5 MR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I 6 have one minute to confer with appellate counsel to 7 make sure there's nothing I need to do to presefte 8 this? + +9 THE COURT: Absolutely. 10 brief recess. Let's 'just take a + +11 (Thereupon, a short r e s taken.) + +13 THE COURT: ht. Thank you again. \ 14 Please have a e . elcome back. + +12 + +15 MR. Your Honor, I want to hopefully 16 tie ypNa oose ends on the matter that has just 17 been on. + +18 Am I correct in understanding that the 9 defendant is prohibited from making any use of the 724 late-disclosed exhibits? + +THE COURT: Yes. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Next, sir, we would request the 23 defendant be required to relinquish possession of 24 all copies of the privileged documents to the Court 25 under seal. They have expressed some concern + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +60 + +1 stating that we have asked them to destroy them. 2 We want them turned over to the Court under seat 3 They should no longer have possession of t41:4 , 4 until such time as somebody rules that a e 5 entitled to have possession. + +6 And I want to make one b t omment about 7 that, if I could can. + +8 Your Honor know v r 11 that IME 9 is a very large .that keeps meticulous time 10 records with regar 11 12 o the services render. And the concept that it is reco struct through those time records 13 74.ved, when it was received, when it was reviewed, what happened with it, who was informed that they impossible to what was of what was happening with it quite frankly is absolutely inconceivable to me; that a law firm of 17 that size, keeping records the way it did, cannot 18 reconstruct what went on with regard to this 19 information. + +20 THE COURT: And that's a good point. What I 21 was going to point out earlier and I failed to do + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22 that, and I appreciate the reminder, is that I + +23 would have expected certainly in deference to the 24 fact that Mr. Epstein was a client of Fall. 25 that someone from Mwould have had the + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. AgSle 561-471-2995 0 + +1 ability to weigh in somehow as to tlies4critical 2 issues. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 having served Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that capacity as counsel, it's an obligat expl reco Mr. .Epstein in their espectful belief that they owed r. Epstein, if not this Court, to d why they had access and kept these their possession in light of that court and in light of this ongoing litigation. And as a matter of respect to Mr. Epstein and his ongoing legal team, to have made some type of affirmative steps to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of same. + +15 So I again want to make clear that I'm finding 16 absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, 17 Miss or anyone else from the Link and Page 72 + +63. + +18 19 20 21 22 Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit in the manner in which they had to do it and the timing, unfortunately, of the matter from their perspective in having to do it, but that takes nothing away from what the Court has already 23remarked upon concerning the fact that Fowler 24in the representation of Mr. pd €t n,ifad 25these records from the inception is of the + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +A + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, 5614crpS INC. + +1 reasons for &lt; Co. s;ruling. + +2 MR.J Your Honor, may we include in 3the direction that opposing counsel is 4 uired to relinquish possession of all copies of 7t e 4Iirprivileged documents to the Court under seal? + +62 + +THE COURT: Well, the only thing that obviously.has to be taken into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're 9going to preserve those rights in light of the fact 10that the Court has rejected the last minute request 11for in-camera inspection for the reasons that I've 12already stated at length on the record. + +13MR. SCAROLA: Which is why I've suggested that + +14 15 16 17reasonable and necessary to examine those 18documents, the appellate court will have 19opportunity to do that. they be relinquished to the Court under seal, your Honor. They can be given an exhibit number. To the extent that the appellate court finds it + +20THE COURT: So you're suggest tp file with 21 22 the Clerk of Court under sea issue? documents at + +23 MR. SCAROLA: that's correct. + +24 A: b THE COURT etter stated. + +25 Do you elS/ objection? + +5 multiple occasions that backup in the preparation + +6 for this case was being provided by the Gunster law + +7 firm, and we would like acertification from them + +8 as well that no copies have been retained. + +4 117.1 , + +PALMi@EACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +63 + +MS. ROCKENBACH: No objection, your Honor. + +THE COURT: So stipulated. + +MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor will recall that + +opposing counsel has also informed the Court on + +MR. LINK: They don't have any, Judge. + +THE COURT: Okay. That's fine. If Mr. Link and Miss Rockenbach are representing that to the Court, I'm satisfied with that representation. + +MR. SCAROLA: And I accept that represen as well, your Honor, but what we would believe we are entitled to is alis persons to whom the privileged documents ha en disseminated. And I'm par concerned in , . this regard; that the tetilhpny of any witness might be influence bflheir improper exposure to privileged docS s. YSo we ask that a complete list of a 7 persons to whom those documents have been d35 mated or the contents of the documents that disseminated be provided to us. + +And I know that Mr. Cassell has some concerns in that regard as well that he would like to + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +address with the Court. So if he may have an opportunity to speak to the Court in this regard -- + +THE COURT: That's fine. + +4Mr. Link, if you want to comment on that? + +5MR. LINK: Yeah. I think I can solve that 6problem very easily, your Honor. + +The documents were within my law firm, and my client. That's it. They haven't been shown o any third parties. There's not athird-party nes for me to put on the stand. And you Zed we can't use them. We won't use them + +12MR. SCAROLA: Does that ;R o de Mr. Epstein? + +13THE COURT: Does wh c Ile Mr. Epstein? + +MR. SCAROLA; stein been provided with copies of these privi uments? ants or the contents of + +17MR L just said my client. My law firm 18and t. And I can say legal counsel, 19 ll . Goldberger. So that's it. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: That may require some further relief that we can address at another time. + +4? we believe that sanctionable conduct has occurred, And so that the record is clear, your Honor, 24and we are reserving the right at alater time -- 25but it's not something that needs to be addressed + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +2 now -- but we're reserving the right to address the issue of appropriate sanctions at a later time. + +3 THE.COURT: Thank you. + +4 Mr. Cassell? + +5 6 MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor 1 Cassell, and I'm here this afternoo 7 understand it's getting late in the ay, I'll be 8 very brief, representing t ims; LM, EW and • .9 Jane Doe. Just one houit irig matter. + +We have filed unopposed. ion to intervene, which is + +12 THE he only thing I need is an order. 13 Every hi e was provided but the proposed • 14 orde if it's unopposed, then phrase it as 15 :1A'and I'll be glad to execute it. + +6 MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. + +Just so the record is clear, on July 19, 2010, seven and a half years ago, LM said these very 19 documents are privileged, and on February 23, 2011, + +20 EW and Jane Doe through counsel said these 21 documents are privileged. So the Epstein entity 22 that is Mr. Epstein and his array of lawyers were 23 on notice at that time that every one of these 45 + +24 documents was privileged. + +25 And then what happened on Friday night, March + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2nd, was that Mr. Link put into the t file summaries of the e-mails, quo ng rom them directly, and we believe tha improper. indeed, we've heard today4) k represent Court all we wanted course they wan Sr ing more. They wanted to put those i e p. lic knew th e t would be out of the bag, publ city uld ensue, and other damage to my ients -camera review, court file because they could occur. And so I'm here this And to the but of afternoon to raise what I think are time of the privileged materials by Mr. Epstein. When I use the term "Mr. Epstein," I'll be referring to this essence concerns about the release of those 14 15 entity. + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +4 /14 6 + +16 Let's be clear. There is no doubt from sworn 17 testimony in front of the Court that on January 10, 18 2018 agents of this law firm picked up a disk from + +19 the law firm, and the law 20firm, as you know from the ELMO, had been directed 21some six or seven years earlier not to retain any 22 23 copies of these documents. So there should be no dispute about the circumstances right now. + +2018-3-8 Transcript - Afternoon Session + +24At that time Mr. Link's law firm, Mr. Epstein, 25were in possession of documents that F + +1. 2 court order. 3 documents 4 5 accuri:::141 was in possession at were in violation of a iS6 ca la has used the term "stolen hink that, frankly, describes nature of the documents, although who ief was, of course, remains to be • mined. + +10 11 12 13 14 So the question in front of you right now is what to do about this. Well, we know one thing. We know there's been absolutely no waiver of attorney/client privilege. How do we know that? Well, your Honor knows the Florida law very well. To be awaiver of attorney/client privilege is something that is disfavored. There has to be a clear, intentional waiver of the privilege. And + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SE INC. + +561-471-29 + +67 + +15 16 17 18 19 20 how do we know there's not been aclear, intentional waiver of the privilege? Just use Mr. Link's word. Things are clear as mud. Well, if something is clear as mud, there cannot be a intentional waiver. So there's no waiver o attorney/client privilege. + +21 I know the hour is late. + +22 23 24 THE COURT: You don't have to 1) rushed. I want to make sure that you>re d and that your clients are heard. + +25 MR. CASSELL: k you, your Honor. We + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +PALM,8EACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +68 + +1 1 is I that because what we've heard shockingly 2t 7i44r safternoon is -- let me -- I know we need to be do( (5 1%Se careful with language let's just say an accused abuser, Mr. Epstein, the man accused of abusing my 5 three clients, we are told has seen these very I 6privileged documents. We're told Mr. Goldberger 7has seen them. We're told, of course, Mr. Link and 8his law firm has seen them. And of course this 9very large law firm, the law firm, has + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 10 seen them as well. And so the question is what do + +11 we do? + +12. 13 And we're mindful in the fact you're about to embark on what's likely to be a very time-consuming 14 trial. So I would like to impose six remedies t1Rat 15 we would ask you to execute today; none of h, 16 want to emphasize, will require consume the 17 Court's time other than signing the prop sed order 18 that we will provide for you. + +19 The first is -- Mr. as already asked 20 for this and I belie ed this, but I want 21 the record to be .A hi y clients are asking that 22 you preclud y usY of the privileged exhibits 23 either direct indirectly or derivatively during 24 the upcoming trial because if someone relies on 25 this information, for example, in asking a question + +(c + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +69 + +to Mr. or asking a question to any of the 2 witnesses that Mr. is presenting, that 3 could implicitly reveal privileged information. + +4 THE COURT: We have all done this, so don't 5 feel like you're alone. Are you talking about Mr. + +6 Epstein? + +7 MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry. If Mr. Epstein's 8 attorneys do that, that's the concern. + +9 So, for example, if they're formulating an 10 questions to Mr. , they shouldn't be to A 11 use any privileged information because ' 12 worried that that could implicitly 13 privileged communications. + +14 Secondly, we would li in counsel -- and 15 that's a broad term th i -- I've probably 16 17 18 19 law firm, ant them all to canvass their 20 records canvass their e-mails, canvass their 21 22 lost track of the i Alc. ilic re law firms, but Mr. Link's law ( Am, tli e law firm, I believe t several others, Mr. Goldberger's ow and tell us if they -- how did this happen? ow did this happen? + +THE COURT: You're talking about how did the firm garner these records? + +MR. CASSELL: Correct. + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +21 14 MR : That would be our request. But 4 r . 15 they be a broad -- you phrased it fishing 16 rption. eSv 17 expedition -- to retrieve what's happened here. But at the minimum we would ask your Honor then to 20 We would phrase it a retrieval direct Epstein attorneys who were previously before this Court, Fowler , to examine the circumstances here. + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +1 . THE COURT: Well, I'm not sure that any of 2 their servers are going to shed light on that. + +3 MR. CASSELL: Well, it may be, for example -- + +4 THE COURT: I don't want to go on a fishing 5 expedition, as you can appreciate. I don't wa to 6 exacerbate the problem; meaning, I don't w o 7 unnecessarily delve into myriad e-mail to 8. gain knowledge that is likely resid ng a the 9 =1firm in some fore o ashion, whether 10 it be current or former or otherwise. So 11 I am not going to go extent at this 12 juncture without proof or basic proof for 13 going in th + +22 23 24 You noted that you thought there might have been an obligation for them to address the Court head on. I'm here telling you that the victims + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +71 + +1 address the victims head on. How did this + +2 3 4 5 6 7 THE COURT: And understandable. confining the obligation of i those entities that I mentioned. It M as ( hhole entities that came to the Court's dally. I don't want this record to s s asn't taking into account the concer s the victims. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 tcv MR. CASSE Ce tainly, your Honor, I wasn't suggestin d this, of course, is my first oppor-Unn ) you have always referred to building a re -- this is my opportunity to build a d as well. So we want to know how these materials were obtained. + +The third thing we want to know is who were the materials distributed to? Mr. Scarola has made 16 that request II behalf of his clients. I'm making 17 that request on behalf of my clients. + +18 We're told that Mr. Goldberger has seen it, + +19 we're told Mr. Epstein has seen it. We want to 20 know who else has seen it. And this, frankly, may + +21 require looking at e-mails, looking at servers and 22 that sort of thing. + +23 I think the record should be clear that in a 24 routine case, you might say, "Well, that's going, to 25 be too expensive." Your Honor is aware this + +S e + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES 561-471-2995 + +"e1 72 1 a routine case because I understand that two of the 2 finest and largest law firms here in,Florida are 3 4 5 accompl h rches that would be involved to 6 see e materials got anywhere. currently repres ihg .Mr. Epstein, so they certainly h the S/ 1esources to search -- to 4i:meea + +7 The fourth thing is we want an order directing . Epstein not to reveal the contents of this information to anyone. We are told that • Mr. Epstein has seen the information, so he should be singled out specifically for an order. + +12 13 14 Fifth -- I think this has already been recovered. All copies of the documents are to be turned over under seal to the Court. + +15 Sixth, we want our temporary sealing order, + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 16 which we will provide later today, to be converted + +17 into a permanent sealing order. Mr. Link filed in + +18 the public court file, we believe highly + +19 improperly, information that he was on notice was + +20 privileged. And he said today he wanted an + +21 in-camera review. Well, you do not get an + +22 in-camera review when you put those very documents, + +23 or at least summaries of those verleiments, into + +24 the public court file. + +25 We want the Friday ing, the notice of + +PALM BEACH 8BSiN \ SERVICES, INC. ?S:1-171!2 + +"S ale' 1 reda t ials, to be placed under permanent 2 seal. + +73 + +3 And then the last request is just a + +housekeeping request. We're obviously scrambling + +to sort out the implications of all this. I'm sure + +I have missed some points that need to be made. + +Due to the late filing of this document, due to the + +8 public filing of the document improperly, we would + +9 like leave to be able to file a supplemental + +10 application for additional remedies after the trial + +11 concludes and after we have received information + +12 about how the documents were obtained and who they 13 went to. + +14 And so those are the requests that I make on 15 behalf of my two clients. + +16 THE COURT: All right. + +17 Mr. Link? + +18 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. Thank yoCip + +19 THE COURT: Thank you. + +20 21 clear about where we go th tuments from. We 22 got them from Fowlet e, your Honor. I don't 23 think that's a 4b terll"anymore. MR. LINK: I'm not su can be more + +24 25 I've represented to the Court who I have shared-the papers with. The Court has ruled that + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995. + +74 + +we're going to take the disks that we have and put it under seal. We'll destroy all the other copies. + +3 That's what Mr. Scarola asked for and that's what 4 we said we would do. + +5 As to the filing, I never said all I wanted 6 was an in-camera inspection. What I said was + +7 Mr. Scarola said he would like one and I said + +8 great, let's have one. + +9 Most important is this: The documents that we + +10 filed -- and there was some miscommunication with + +11 Mr. Cassell -- I want to make sure the record + +12 clear -- we did two things: We filed re + +13 documents. We redacted all of the na 4441:: , LM + +14 and Jane Doe, as this Court has in truc ed. So + +15 their initials were wiped ou . Cassell called + +16 me and said, "I'm lookin cument and I see + +17 their initials." looking at is we + +18 served the coun d and delivered to the + +19 Court -- di t p it in the public file -- the + +20 unredac do nts so we would all know what was + +21 in t + +22 THE COURT: By the court, you mean + +MR. LINK: To you. To the judge. + +THE COURT: -- to myself. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 THE COURT: Not as far as the court file is + +2 concerned. + +75 + +3MR. LINK: ;The court file only contains the 4redacted version. We have double checked that. I 5asked Mr. Cassell to tell me if I missed a 6redaction. Could it happen? Yes, it could happen. 7We haven't found one. If there was one that 8 9 10 redacted, we'd be glad to redact it. B only thing that was filed in the clerk f redacted version. + +11 Thank you, Judge. + +12 THE COURT: All ri ank you. + +13' Much of which - rmuch of the relief that 14has been reque ha essentially been taken care 15of I bell v firough the Court's prior order; that 16is, that ne disk containing the documents that 17are being sought to be introduced at trial to take 18cord will be permitted to be filed under seal. 19The sanitized redacted versions of those records 22 23 also ordering to be sealed in an abundance of caution just in case there may be some error, not intentional, on the part of counsel who filed those records. + +24 25 Mr. Epstein will be barred from referring to any of those records as it relates to the documents + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +76 + +1 that were 2 other source 3 that were the 4 5 6 gathered from Inallor from any that would have included those 0 c rds eitc;: . subject of Judge Ray's ord ' o tilin it's to preclude anything coming in t ug e back door which wouldn't be allowe'ompugh the front. + +7 Mr. Link, did you wa.3o, mment on this? + +8 9 10 11 MR. LINK: Yes. 1 ed to remind the Court we have over aIll4 v s S el that disk t I are lready in the court file. We've u d thq imein depositions. So I'm hibits that were listed on 12 wondIrina those aren't excluded. + +13THE COURT: Right. I'm not talking about 147t ose. 44v I'm talking about the ones that have been e lS v derived from and that have been sought "a C1. 3/7 whatever this number is, or the 45 that have been to be introduced as part of the 748 or 724, or 18claimed as privileged and have not been ruled upon 19and will not be ruled upon prior to trial because 20of the reasons that I have explained in detail 21 earlier. + +22 MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge. + +23 THE COURT: Mr. Cassell, did i leave out + +24 anything else? + +25 MR. CASSELL: Yes. We want to know how the + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. A S + +561-471-2995 + +1 • 2 documents, and then we want where they 3 went. Epstein entities came into possessi .d the + +4 THE COURT: B a of the court ruling, I 5 don't find that be front burner issue at this 6 time. P1 a t confuse anyone here. The 7 ce to front burner as opposed to 8 bein ssue of importance. Front burner simply 9 that in preparation for a trial that is actually a mere two to three business days away, if you count tomorrow, which I don't really count as a court business day because of my obligations to the 13 Bench Bar Conference, I won't have the opportunity 14 to really delve into that prior to trial. + +O 77 + +15 And as Mr. Scarola pointed out, I believe, 16 earlier, that can be done at another time. So I am 17 certainly not going to forget that it needs to be + +18 done. But it will be ordered that it be done post 19 trial. + +20 Any other remedies that are sought as you go 21 along -- I understand the relative late nature of 22 these revelations; hence, you are not precluded 23 from filing a supplemental motion. + +24 I also note that you have requested attorney's 25 fees and costs related to this endeavor, and I'm + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 56;'472.-.495 + +reserving o ?at SisSI9well. + +2 MR L: But related to that is the 3 dist . The cat is now wandering out of the 4 ago so time is of the essence. + +78 + +5 THE COURT: Right. And again, I think that in ec + b an abundance of caution, and I understand your concerns, but what the attorneys here recognize - and Mr. Epstein is also under this order -- is that 9 no further dissemination is going to be made. 10 think that goes without saying as far as the 11 attorneys are concerned. I've known each of them 12 seated at counsel table for many years, as I have + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 13 known Mr. Scarola and Miss Terry, Mr. Burlington, + +14 and I think they recognize that when this Court 15 makes a statement, that it is abundantly clear that 16 it will be enforced to the letter. I have no doubt 17 in my mind that they will all be respectful of the 18 court order of non-dissemination of any of those 19 documents hence forth. + +20 And Mr. Link has already represented to the 21 Court that other than Mr. Eps in and his 22 co-counsel, that there ha e no eyes laid upon 23 these documents. Herlef, iifaccepting that 24 25 representation, :ihse X s o arola has accepted those representati du g the hearing as well. + +4147me + +(PALM LEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +\ZIP' MR. CASSELL: We haven't heard, of course, from Will, the Court direct them to make similar representations? + +THE COURT: I believe that I have sufficient 5 authority to do that under these relatively 6 peculiar circumstances. My jurisdiction, though, 7 is somewhat limited because they have withdrawn 8 from the case. + +79 + +9 As a general blanket order I would simply say 10 that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr. 11 Epstein shall be subject to this order of 12 confidentiality, of sealing and of non-13 dissemination of any such information that i 14 contemplated in any of the documents th- part 15 of the umbrella order of Judge Ray.(-A•A at would 16 include all of the exhibits that wi4poce about 17 today and that have been f' as a matter of 18 record. + +et\ 19 MR. CASSELL: Couid t ey also be directed to 20 make a representation as to who they have 21 distributed the documents to? + +22 THE COURT: Mr. Link has already -- are you 23 talkiQg about IIIIII + +24 R. CASSELL: + +25 CY THE COURT: I don't think that I have that + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 ability. + +2 3 then? I believe that you do have -- all right. MR. CASSELL: Could I be heard on that issue + +80 + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 4 We'll deal with that later then, your Honor. + +5 MR. LINK: Can I make a suggestion, your 6 Honor, that might be helpful? + +7 THE COURT: Sure. + +8 MR. LINK: We now have, I think, 34 or 36 9 boxes they delivered; I believe all the bo he 10 have. The disk, the original disk, we • it. 11 I don't know for sure, but I doubt hat ere's 12 another disk that they made aid kopt. If the Court 13 will instruct as part of..aif.gr€r that we 14 maintain the boxes, 15 them back, then 'IS"v ake possession of the 16 boxes. owler MB wanted + +17 If you are telling me that you 18 utho ty from Mr. Epstein to retain those 19 tpQZes and Mr. Epstein is essentially giving you Ac 20 carte blanche, you and Miss Rockenbach and Mr. Goldberger jointly, the authority to make any 1. decisions necessary to protect his interests, that 23 motion would be granted. + +24 MR. LINK: I'm standing here with this puzzled 25 look because I'm not sure what that means, frankly. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 All I was trying to do is say I will preserve the 2 documents, the original files, because I don't 3 think there's another set of files somewhere. 4 In had asked me to return them on 5 went through them, and if the Court ca uct me 6 to hold the boxes, then I will do . + +7 THE COURT: I don't have ro ledwith making 8 that instruction, so I'll jat that. You're 9 speaking on behalf of r nt, Mr. Epstein, as 10 well as your own w rm, and Mr. Goldberger, I 11 take it, as so have no problem making -- in 12 entering oder since you're current counsel 13 for ~l tin + +14 INK: Thank you, Judge. I think that 15 make custody easier. + +16 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, there are two additional matters that I would hope can be disposed of in advance of the start of trial. + +19 THE COURT: Sure. + +20 MR. SCAROLA: One is Mr. Epstein's motion to 21 strike Dr. Jansen, and the second is issues with 22 regard to adverse inference. I think that both of 23 those matters have been fully briefed. + +24 Mr. Burlington is here to present argument in 25 response to the motion regarding Dr. Jansen. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 . + +1 I suggest -- your Honor has told 2 finishing at 4:30 today -- that 'we 3 minutes, seveniand a half min er side, to each 4 of those matters. + +5 THE COURT: All '1\$Ss Off the record. 6 (Discussion Sise the record.) + +7 MR. LI Yo Honor, we have a motion to 8 strike e 9 hibits that they disclosed late 9 afte he off. I think if we're going to do a 10 se and a gander, the Court should rule those 11 7 e hibits are stricken. + +THE COURT: Well, I have to -- I want to review that motion again since my concentration has 14 been on the sequencing that I mentioned before. 15 I'll be glad to deal with it prior to trial. + +16 MR. LINK: I'm comfortable with your Honor 17 ruling on the papers if Mr. Scarola is. + +18 THE COURT: Well, I'd rather, since it's + +endeavor, but I think it's.better to have you heard in number, I'd rather have argument on the subject, to be perfectly with you. I appreciate your willingness to entrust the Court with that 23 on the record. + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 19something of the magnitude of trial exhibits and 79 + +25All right. Mr. Burlington, whic d you + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SE INC. 561-471-299 + +1 want to tackle fir 4 + +83 + +2MR. BURLI our Honor, it's his motion. + +3MR. SCAROLA: The motion to strike Dr. Jansen. + +4- THE' COURT: All right. + +MR, BURLINGTON: Unless you want me to argue sides, your Honor. + +\YY10 MR. LINK: Which one are we on? + +11 MS. TERRY: Jansen. + +12 MR. LINK: Jansen. Okay. + +13 14 Good afternoon, your Honor. See if I can start over today. + +from MR. SCAROLA: Adverse interest, your Honor, the assertion of the Fifth Amendment. + +THE COURT: What's the other motion? + +15 THE COURT: You have done fine. + +16 MR. LINK: I don't remember winning one yet, 17 so maybe this one. I have hopes. + +18 Your Honor, this is our motion to strike 19 Dr. Jansen. And I know the Court has read the 20 paper, so I'm going to be very brief about this. + +21 We have struggled since coming his 22 Court in December with what this ca because I 23 keep saying to the Court th 9dwards wants to 24 try a defamation action s to clear his 25 name, he wants def a h- ype damages, and the + +> /41 PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 84 + +1 urt keeps rebuking me properly and saying, no, ec 2 t is is a malicious prosecution action. We're not going to try a defamation action. + +0 Their expert that they want to put on the 14÷ 5 stand for damages has no opinion, your Honor, as to 6 damages. Not one. He can't talk about any damage 7 suffered by Mr. , if any. His sole opinion 8 is that he was given defamatory statements by 9 counsel, defamatory statements, and told to do a + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 10 search to see how many times the defamatory + +11 statements hit a web page or how many people 12 touched the web page with the defamatory statement 13 on it. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 it make any differe 21 of Mr. a feci not do business with him, 22 did they fir i.r So, for example, there's a newspaper article that says Rothstein and MS and tha a azine or that newspaper has 3,000 people th t the newspaper. He says there are 3,0011C. tell you if one of the 3,000 e read the article, what they thoug the article, did He can't hey change their view + +23 He a ;gelthas no economic damages, so how 24 doe a jury to hear about nine million web 25 -hits when you can't point to a single person -- I + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 85 + +said, "Tell me one person, one person, Or. Jansen, 2 that you know read one of these articles." He + +3 said, "I can't. I have no idea." + +4 The other thing that was important is he said, 5 "I just use an average of data. I can't tell you + +25 22 The suggestion that he cannot give opinions on damages ignores the nature of the damages for which case law is clear, which includes reputational damages, shame and humiliation. They have + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +6 exactly because they accumulated over months." He 7 can't even tell us how many times this article was 8 actually touched. All he can tell you is if I go 9 to the Palm Beach Shiny Sheet website, on an 10 average month 3,000 people look at it. So h 11 that help the jury from a damages expert mine 12 whether the filing of this maliciou ec ion 13 action caused Mr. S any damag + +14 Thank you, Judge. + +15 THE COURT: All ri nk you. + +Mr. Burlingtoi 16 + +MR. BURLY 'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 18 behalf of wards. + +19 20 ques rmination comes down to four First, is the expert qualified? That's 21 being challenged. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 acknowledged shame and humiliation as an element of 2 damage. We've citied on page 6 of our response 3 five Florida cases. Two of them, Florida Supreme 4 Court cases, make it very clear reputational 5 6 damages are a valid element of a malicious prosecution case. + +7 So how do you monetize -- how do 8 monetize the damage that has been uffe ed by my 9 client? We've citied cases, here are cases we 10 rely on from outside the u tion, but it's 11 clear from the many ases we cite this all 12 arises from the nXaw, and malicious 13 prosecution des ibed many times as an ancient 14 cause o a t ,, so it's 15 comm'lap So reliance on foreign jurisdictions 16 17 k s not h Florida law. all developed by the unusual, especially when it's consistent + +But the clearest discussion is in a case called Browning, which says that in reputational 14. 43 damages, which are particularly hard to prove, and 21 there's no case that I've ever read where in a 22 malicious prosecution case a plaintiff was put to 23 the burden of bringing in an individual who said, 24 "I didn't send my case to this lawyer because I + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. . 561-471-2995 • • + +I ' + +1 would require,. of course, months of trial to 2 people in. But that's not our burden. + +3 THE COURT: Right.. And we're 'Looking at a 4 defamation case from the standpoint ublication, 5 where publication is reallyi, it. So that's not what is being terms of the 7 expert testimony, nderstand it. + +8 MR. BURLI : tell, we're seeking to prove 9 the dissemiltttiopr as we would in a defamation 10 case. + +11 ,COURT: Well, dissemination and recognized 12 tknowledged publications are two different 13 things is what I'm trying to say. I'm essentially agreeing with you, I think, in the sense that there's no need to prove publication. + +16 When I say "publication," I'm talking about 17 the consumption of that information by another 18 party and that party's -- and the effect on that 19 listener, or the effect on the person who agreed 20 with that material. You're speaking only to the + +21 issue of dissemination. + +22 MR. BURLINGTON: The Browning case says that 23 the two primary factors in determining reputational 24 damages are the gravity of the false allegations -- 25 and here we have a young, talented trial lawyer Who + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 88 + +1 is being accused not onl o 71fous crimes, but 2 heinous crimes invol rmining the judicial 3 system. And th and factor noted in 4 Browning, a t' ited in other cases, is the 5 degree p ,ure of the false allegations. + +6 And e cited multiple cases in my brief that 7 ay. that when courts have evaluated the 8 essiveness of a malicious prosecution award, one 44Se of the critical considerations is the degree of exposure of the false allegations. And this is how we are doing it in the Internet age. 11 + +12 If we were 30, 40 years ago and this was done 13 and let's say it was only exposed in this area of 14 the country, Palm Beach County, Broward, Miami, we 15 would come in with the newspaper's circulation to + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 16 give the jury some idea of the exposure. That + +17 doesn't really have much probative value in the 18 Internet age. 'I • + +19 And Dr. Jansen is undisputedly qualified, 20 probably more than anybody, to do this, and he 21 explained how conservative his analysis wa d 22 he's not going to tell the jury that t 23 million six hundred hits means that million 24 six hundred 25 V thousand people r is story and now S ' believed that Brad Edward S iminal, and so + +8 9 10 11 trial will be all about. 2 And one of the factors here is a very well-3 ized principle of.the Bigelow case, which is a U.S. Supreme Court case, that says that one of the fundamental principles of justice is that if a defendant engages in wrongful conduct that creates uncertainty as to damages, that falls on them. You can't put the plaintiff to what is an essentially impossible burden, assuming we prove our cause of action. And that, of course, is an issue that this + +PALM BEACH BEP%;:1 AC SERVICES, INC. 561471-2995 , + +89 + +1 forth and !so on. + +12 But they're trying to say really you can never 13 prove reputational damages without bringing in Joe 14 Six Pack off the street and inquiring of him how 15 much of a grudge he's holding against Brad 16 17 because of false allegations. That is simply. not the standard. A';, + +18 19 20 21 Is it helpful to the jury? W ; I, ie jury is not going to understand the com le 14.14) of dissemination of information e Internet, and this witness is specifich pbalified to do that. + +22 23 24 So when we go\ gh the analysis is he qualified, is iss e relevant, is it helpful to the jury, vatjsfy those three. + +25 Then we come to reasons to exclude. And the + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +only reason I saw raised in their motion for • excluding it was vague references to confusion. 3 And I don't see how there could be confusion, given 4 the clear parameters of what Dr. Jansen testified 5 to were his directions, his methodology. There was 6 terminology that he has to explain to the jury, but + +90 + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 7 all experts do that in complex situations. The + +8 jury here would not be capable of making an 9 analysis of the degree of dissemination on the 10 Internet as a matter of their common sense. + +11 THE COURT: I didn't read the motion as 12 suggesting a prior Daubert analysis being required. + +MR. BURLINGTON: I'm sorry? 13 + +THE COURT: I didn't read the c, oo filed by 14 15 Mr. Link to talk about his se a Frye or 16 Daubert analysis. + +17 MR. BURLINGTON: That's my reading 18 as well, your Ho + +19 Now, th wa a little preamble, as there has 20 been on iRotions'here, about how this is all 21 abou a.d motion action, and we've cited in our 22 sponse the term "defamation" is a general term in /. • .. • I 23 t e English language, and we've cited Miriam ec i Webster, which is about as IIIII bread as you can 0 get on a definition. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 91 + +1 The fact that that term is used not only in 2 describing certain parts of the task that was Page 107 + +3 assigned to Dr. Jansen or in our argument regarding 4 the nature of the damages, it's because that term 5 properly applies to false statements of fact that 6 accuse a person of criminal conduct, of being 7 insane, being untrustworthy and so forth. 8 not in any way a suggestion that we are 9 defamation action. + +10 The reputational damages 11 recognized by the Florida Court. They have 12 been recognized as one o intangible damages 13 for which a jury h b given broad discretion. 14 On the other h t have to be given 15 parameters. n this context, the two primary 16 ones ak r utational damages are the gravity of 17 the allegations and the degree of exposure. 18 hat is exactly what this expert is qualified 19 ^ to testify about. And there's been no suggestion as to what confusion there would be. And so, therefore, we believe we have satisfied the 22 standard, and it's your discretion regarding the 23 admission of his testimony. are Ly + +24 And to strike a witness entirely is the most 25 extreme remedy that could be sought in this + +# PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +92 + +1 context, and we submit it is not appropriate and 2 the motion should be denied. + +3 THE COURT: All right,, thank you. + +4 Mr. Link, you have a few minutes u . + +5 MR. LINK: Very briefly, Judge + +6 I think a little bit of the confusion on the 7 damages is there's really fSndards. The 8 standard for damages cious prosecution 9 based on lack of,DraYable cause in a criminal 10 action has p se images. They're assumed, 11 12 because o ody makes an allegations that you are cr al in the criminal court and they have u arrested, then your reputation and your IP\* c aracter are immediately impugned. + +This is civil. In civil it requires damages proximately caused. And it's not a Frye analysis, 17 it's not a Daubert analysis, it's a basic does this 18 help the jury and is it a 403 issue, which is if I 19 get on the stand and I say there were nine million 20 hits when in fact all he did was search for 21 defamatory terms given to him by counsel without + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22 taking into consideration was it Mr. I who + +23 spoke to the press, did he do a press release, when 24 did these when were the -- when did the 25 dissemination take place, did anybody read them, + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 93 + +1 did it make any difference? + +2 One of the things Mr. rd has told us is 3 he has no economic dam s 7 s law firm has made 4 substantially mor , r himself personally, 5 since Mr. Epst sue him than from before. + +6 So t the jury nine million hits sounds 7 like on1 lion people are reading this. I 8 beli at prejudice outweighs any, any value it 9 t have, any relevance in this action, because 10 he needs to show damages proximately caused and not just put someone on the stand to talk about hits. + +Thank you, Judge. + +13 THE COURT: Okay. I was writing as we were 14 speaking and certainly was anticipating 15 Mr. Burlington to state the well-known legal action 16 that a request to strike a witness is a drastic and 17 extreme measure reserved only in rare + +18 circumstances, especially where here we're dealing 19 with an expert which is otherwise qualified to 20 testify to what he's going to testify. And there 21 being no Daubert or Frye analysis necessary, the 22 Court would deny the motion. + +23 I would point out that many of the that 24 were raised by Mr. Link both in his tion 25 and orally certainly can be effecti dealt with + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. • : 561- 71-2" A44;: + +1 on cross-exa ati S . But the core aspect of the 2 Court's n oday is that reputational damages 3 and or humiliation are difficult to 4 ilemonstrate to a jury, and the manner in which the S plaintiff chooses to go about presenting that testimony, in this Court's view, is reasonable in 4? that motion is respectfully denied. part to Dr. Jansen's proposed testimony. So again, + +94 + +9 The next issue. + +10 MR. LINK: Judge, I think that's 0 for 5. + +11 THE COURT: I don't keep score. Never have 12 and never will. I know you say it in gest, and I + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 13 allowed it the last time without a mention, but + +14 repeating it is inappropriate. + +15 16 MR. LINK: Judge, I'm sorry. It was not meant to be inappropriate. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue '\ 18 before the Court relates to the plaintiff 19 entitlement to an adverse inference i 20 arising out of each of those circu stan es where 21 Jeffrey Epstein has asserted ifth Amendment 22 right to remain silent. ary objection to 23 the entitlement to a tion really related to 24 the content of t s ction. + +' 25 And I e h ed your Honor the adverse + +CPA LI, ACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +95 + +i ference instruction based on Fifth Amendment assertions that we are requesting of the Court, which I suggest to your Honor is in direct conformity with the United States Supreme Court's 5 opinion in Baxter versus Palmigiano and also 6 conforms with the clarification in the case of 7 Coquina Investments versus Rothstein. 8 Interestingly, a matter related to the Ponzi + +9 scheme. + +10 And those two cases together stand for the . • • 11 basic principle that you may not base civil 12 liability solely upon the assertion of a 13 Amendment privilege. But if a defendant conf 14 with evidence against him in the context • civil 15 case refuses to answer questions th levant 16 and material to that civil case, th • awing an 17 adverse inference based upo Fifth Amendment • 19 That's exactly wha 4( 1;i!i Ci struction e 18 assertion is not requir permitted. says. + +20 Your Honor'\weDi aware of the broad array of 21 22 23 questions Mr. Epstein has refused to provide, and it is of particular significance that those refusals occurred in the ext of efforts to obtain discovery on the claim at Mr. Epstein himself asserted. + +> • PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. . 561-471-2995 + +> > 96 + +1 He filed a lawsuit intending not to provide 2 any discovery with respect to the claims that he 3 made and, carrying through on that intention, + +#### 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 4 refusing to provide any discovery on those claims + +5 that he made. Under those circumstances, an 6 adverse inference instruction is particularly 7 appropriate. + +8 I might also point out to the Court that, ere 10 y e e. Separ prt from 11 Amendment concerns, if someone is onf nted with 13 this case not only a rig 14 speak up in response accusations and they 15 fail to say an at accounts to an admission 16 by silence.el Aps is a basic principle of law relating to a : io b sil nc ate and a a i^jc r, accusations under circumstan ere t obligation to they have in + +9 12 + +17 So base on those two very fundamental 18 principles, 'the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 ifthlmendment protections do not apply in the 20 dc ntext of civil litigation based upon the basic principle of admissions against silence, admission of a party opponent by silence. + +23 We ask the Court approve this proposed 24 instruction and permit us to comment upon 25 Mr. Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment 1 2 3 privilege in the context of this civil litigation in each context in which those assertions were . made. + +4 5 6 9 10 11 So it relates to his assertion of the F Amendment privilege with regard to the e s of the claim that he brought against Br Ei ards, it relates to his assertion of Fift ndment privilege with regard to al ons relating to his economic circumstan s, t elates to his assertion of the F dment privilege in every context in whig4e h asserted that privilege. + +12 Thank + +13 : Thank you. + +14 .15 carola, the reference to Florida standard nstruction 301.11, am I going to find this there? + +MR. SCAROLA: What you're going to find there, your Honor, is a spoliation instruction. And what 19 we've done is we have adopted the spoliation 20 instruction, which is the closest standard in 21 jury -- closest standard jury instruction to these 22 circumstances. That'is not an adverse inference 23 instruction based upon Fifth Amendment. No such + +24 standard jury instruction exists. + +25 THE COURT: Well, I didn't think so. And + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 thank you for that clarification. + +2 I'm surprised that there real ah n t more 3 cases that deal with this instPl ion in a civil 4 context. And no Florida at you're aware of? + +6 MR. SCAROL • q na is a Florida case, your 7 Honor. + +8 TH •• Well, it's a Federal District 9 Cour cas not a Florida appellate court case, ie hick would be binding on this Court. + +11 All right. Counsel for Mr. Epstein? + +MR. GOLDBERGER: Now I get to stand. + +Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of 14 Mr. Epstein. + +15 Your Honor, as a general statement of the law, 16 Mr. Scarola is correct. + +17 THE COURT: Let me tell you where I have some 18 issues, Mr. Goldberger, with this. And Mr. Scarola + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 19 can speak to it as well, now that I understand its 20 origination. + +21 The first sentence I don't really have a 22 problem with. The second sentence is where I have 23 a problem. It says, quote, However, the protection o 24 that applies in a criminal proceeding does not 25 apply in a civil lawsuit when a person •pon + +# PALM BEACH REPORTING SER .561-471-29 + +99 + +A4(%. 1 the Fifth.Amendment, retuses to answer questions 2 when evidence is offered against him which is 3 relevant to the.case, end quote. I don't think 4 that's an accurate' statement of the protection 5 mechanism. + +> 6 MR. GOLDBERGER: I bracketed that myself, your Honor, in the instructions Mr. Scarola gave me. And my concern may be a little different than the Court. + +10 Whether that's accurate or not, I don't want 11 this jury to be thinking well, the right against 12 self-incrimination applies in a criminal case and, 13 therefore, he's guilty of everything that they're 14 trying to get an adverse inference on. There + +T. + +#### 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +15 simply is not a connect there. I don't know why we 16 need to mention anything about a criminal case in 17 this jury instruction other than Mr. Epstein under 18 the United States Constitution cannot be compel ed 19 to provide evidence against himself in a cri 20 proceeding, period. + +21 And then, you know, and the guilt j0 crime 22 may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth 23 Amendment right to remain silent, that's confusing, 24 your Honor, and it's just going to inject criminal 25 issues into this civil trial, and I think it's just + +> PALM '8 - °i:161-471-2995 PORTING SERVICES, INC. t + +C.) 1. ot necessary to the instruction that Mr. Scarola seeking that this Court give to this jury. 4.4(c + +100 + +2 And 0 then the second sentence, your Honor, + 5 criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil address, However, the protection that applies in a 6 lawsuit when a person, based on the Fifth 7 Amendment, refuses to answer questions. And I know 8 where the Court is heading because that requires a 9 balancing test at this point. + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 10 JudgellIII, by the way, your Honor, back in + +11 November of 2013 addressed this very issue in an 12 order that he entered. And I'll quote from it. + +13 This is Order on Counter-plaintiff IIIIIII + +14 Motion to Determine Status of Punitive Damage 15 Discovery and Applicability of Adverse Inf ce. 16 And in that order, your Honor, your pr dec s 17 judge, Judge IIII, stated, "The co ter PTai\_ntiff, + +18 19 20. 21 deferred until t 22 23 24 " -- I'm sorry counter-plaintiff r u for jury instructions adverse 'S e ty: instruction is i's: f trial. And at the time of trial, u spe~4Fic analysis of the specific questio swers, including those propounded in d the Court will determine whether an 25 adverse inference instruction will or will not be + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 101 + +given." + +2 So I think what Judge meant in 2013 is 3 that you can't determine what the instruction is 4 going to be until such time as you hear the 5 question, and then you must first do a 403 + +6 analysis. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 Well, first you must determine whether it's relevant, then you have to do a 403 analysis, then you have to decide whether under that 403 analy is and respecting the sanctity of an invocation he Fifth Amendment privilege, whether an a inference instruction is appropria + +13 14 point to have a blanket in n to give to this 15 jury every time -- bas o e ry time Mr. Epstein 16 invokes his Fifth men privilege I do not 17 believe is a c ct atement of the law. And I 18 would ask t urt to follow Judge order, 19 where 'm going to do it on a 20 ques y-question basis. So for Mr. Scarola to simply liiV u at this + +21 THE COURT: Well, a couple things. One is, 22 again, presuming, without knowing, what was going through Judge mind at the time, but I would think that the likely contemplation was that by the time this case got to trial, whether it was in + +# 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +#### 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 1 2014, '15 and now '18, Mr. Epstein's criminal + +2 issues would have been behind him and that there 3 was not at that particular juncture a need to rule 4 on something that was probably potentially, at 5 best, speculative. However, the time is now, soicto 6 speak, because we've gone through in painstaking 7 detail most of those questions that the Court 8 deemed relevant and that Mr. Epstein invoked his 9 Fifth Amendment privilege and fthesefore, the Court 10 would find that an advers tion would be 11 appropriate. + +12 The languag find fault with, 13 particularly th econd sentence, will have to 14 be iron e' t 15 to b pal le dealt with in a way that's going to the Court. + +16 17 ii?itryou certainly have the right, and it is a m tter of law in the civil context, that if you seek to have an instruction provided to the jury on this issue, it must be filed to preserve error. + +Now, of course, if it was -- if it's deemed to 21 be erroneous to give an instruction at all, then 22 that requirement would be obviated. However, if 23 you are seeking an order with the Court's stated 24 intent that one will be given -- because as far as + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 my rulings relative to the Fifth Amendment ilnk, 2 that I've already reviewed -- I'll be 3 review a proposed instruction that our 4 team prepared. + +So at this time -- ag going to give 6 the instruction. An i tr t n The instruction 7 is still up in the amain erms of the wording. + +8 I'm comfo le th actually the first 9 sentence, mfortable with the second 10 paragr 's the second sentence in the first 11 para that will need to be changed. 12 \,1 14R. SCAROLA: May I suggest a language change, 13 your Honor, because I think I understand - although your Honor has not articulated the concern, I think in rereading that second sentence, 16 I understand how it could be of concern. The Fifth 17 Amendment -- + +18 THE COURT: The concern potentially is the 19 blanket statement that protection that applies in a 20 criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil + +21 lawsuit. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. I understand that. + +23 What I suggest for consideration by the Court and 24 opposing counsel, instead of the instruction 25 reading, "However, the protection that appli + +> . PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES ' 561-471-2995. + +> > 104 + +1 criminal proceeding does t per," it should 2 read, "However, the t n against drawing an 3 adverse inferenc t 'pplies in a criminal 4 proceeding d no pply in a civil lawsuit," 5 et ceter 's the part that does not apply. + +6 ou t11 have your Fifth Amendment 7 otection; however, you don't have protection a ainst an adverse inference. That's what I intended to say. It's not said as clearly as it 11 should be, so I suggest that the language read, "However, the prohibition against drawing an 12 adverse inference that applies in a criminal 13 proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit," 14 et cetera. + +15 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, I accept what Mr. + +16 Scarola is trying to clarify, but I also accept + +17 your invitation to come up with our own instruction 18 at this point. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: I just want to be sure our 20 proposal is on the table. And that's what it is. + +21 THE COURT: However, the prohibition against 22 23 the word "protection" and substitute "prohibition 24 against drawing an adverse ice. drawing an adverse inference -- so we' I eliminate + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, I believe is an + +PALM BEACH AS SERVICES, INC. :561-471-2995 + +105 + +1 absol exact statement of the law. + +2 OURT: All right. I certainly can live 3 h that more so than I could letting that sentence stand as it was. + +But again, your invitation remains. I'll be ,÷6 glad to take into consideration any proposed 7 instruction that you provide me, Mr. Goldberger, 8 and your team. + +9 But again, I'm ruling that adverse instruction 10 is abundantly necessary, without question. And, 11 therefore, one will be given. + +12 But again, I will invite you to prepare one 13 for the Court's consideration. + +14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thanks, Judge. That's 15 obviously subject to relevancy. Obviously. + +J ", • + +16 THE COURT: I'll put on the record for you -So • 17 that there's no equivocation, I understand that 18 your blanket objection is to giving ,an 'adverse 19 instruction at all. That is recognized, and it's 20 overruled. + +21 However, as I said a bstitute, my 22 understanding of t t be is it will be 23 necessary now th th Court has ruled, unless you 24 25 simply want to stand on your blanket objection, that an alternative instruction must be given for + +3 4 So at this time -- again, I'm going to give the instruction. An instruction. The instruction is still up in the air in terms of the wording. + +6 I'm comfortable with actually the first + +IZPII ;. ALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. VP '561-471-2995., + +106 + +the Court to consider so as to preserve further your objection. + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 7 sentence, I'm comfortable with the second + +8 paragraph. It's the second sentence in the first 9 paragraph that will need to be changed. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: May I suggest a language change, 11 your Honor, because I think I understand -- 12 although your Honor has not articulated t 13 concern, I think in rereading that se e ence, 14 I understand how it could be of co cern The Fifth 15 Amendment -- + +16 THE COURT: The con r p8tentially is the 17 blanket statement th t"p t tion that applies in a 18 criminal procee o not apply in a civil 19 lawsuit. + +20 MR : Yes, sir. I understand that. 21 Wha I su st for consideration by the Court and 22 o posing counsel, instead of the instruction 23 p, r ding, "However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply," it should read, "However, the prohibition against drawing an + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 107 + +1 adverse inference that applies in a criminal 2 proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit," + +3 .et cetera. That's the part that does not apply. + +4 • You still have your Fifth Amendment + +5 protection; however, you don't have protection + +6 against an adverse inference. That's what I + +8 should be, so I suggest that the language r + +intended to say. It's not said as clearly asAt + +\il -- + +9 "However, the prohibition against dr + +10 adverse inference that applies in a i 3na1 + +11 proceeding does not apply ig 1 lawsuit," + +12 et cetera. + +13 MR. GOLDBERGE r Flonor, I accept what Mr. + +14 Scarola is try arify, but I also accept + +15 your invite come up with our own instruction + +16 at this point. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: I just want to be sure our + +18 hr~Dbosal is on the table. And that's what it is. + +19 THE COURT: However, the prohibition against + +drawing an adverse inference -- so we'll eliminate + +• the word "protection" and substitute "prohibition + +. . 22 against drawing an adverse inference." + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, which I believe is an + +24 absolutely exact statement of the law. + +25 THE COURT: All right. I certainly can live + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +108 + +1 with that more so than I could letting that 2 sentence stand as it was. + +3 But again, your invitation remains. b 4 glad to take into consideration any p 5 instruction that you provide me, M!. Goy. erger, 6 and your team. + +7 But again, I'm ruli tjla dverse instruction 8 is abundantly necess out question. And, 9 therefore, one w e 3ven. + +10 But aga I 11 invite you to prepare one 11 for the consideration. + +12 OLA: Your Honor, we thank you very 13 uch or your generous allotment of time today. 14 L ok forward to seeing you on Tuesday. + +ec THE COURT: It's my pleasure. + +453 your written and oral presentations. I appreciate Again, you all have done a superb job in both 18 the excellent argument. As I've mentioned in the 19 past, if I had the pleasure of dealing with 20 attorneys of all of your caliber each and every 21 day, I wouldn't have the headaches that I do + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 22 physically and figuratively. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, for planning 24 purposes, are we going to be conducting an initial 25 screening on Tuesday, having jurors fill out the + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. AcID; 561-471-2995 + +> > 109 + +1 questionnaire and then returning fo dire on 2 3 4 5 the underlying circumstances of this case. Wednesday? The initial screening ' would think - • 'would include hardship challenges and also questions with regard to anyone's familiarity with + +6 THE COURT: That's something that we're going 7 to hays, discuss, and I guess the best time to do 8 it i Take a little bit more time. + +9 10 more minutes? Ic"411;14 adam court reporter, are you okay with a few + ++ 12 13 14 the venire panels. I'm going to have a hundred. THE COURT: My thinking is that likely it will be necessary to preliminarily individually question + +15 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +16 THE COURT: I know that will be time 17 consuming, but based upon the Dippolito case, and + +THE REPORTER: Sure. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 this having some parallels as far as the publicity aspects are concerned and the nature of the allegations and admissions that we're dealing with here, that it's incumbent upon the Court to individually question each of the initial venire members as to their knowledge of the individuals involved in this case. Those are preliminarily. : + +#### 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +Atmc PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561 S1195 7 + +110 + +1 MR. S LA: ay I make a suggestion? + +2 TH Sure. Whoever is going to 3 pri rily duct voir dire, why don't you come up to the podium so I can hear from you and you don't ave to jump up and down. + +MR. SCAROLA: We've proposed a juror questionnaire and I think that we're probably close in terms of the content of that juror 9 questionnaire. + +10 THE COURT: I haven't seen it. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: If we're not there already, 12 we're close in terms of the contents of that + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 13 questionnaire. + +14 THE COURT: I haven't seen it yet, so that's a 15 bit of a disadvantage for me because this is 16 something that goes unmentioned, but certainly it 17 is my philosophy in most of the cases that I handle 18 and all of the cases when I'm dealing with 19 exceptionally competent lawyers, once voir dire is '\•., 22 s terin e g this trial , and N t ' to cometent, p 23 experienced attorneys comes to over, there's little that the jury hears from me. tra, You are the ones who are goingy e essentially 24 stipulations. + +20 + +21 + +25 And the urt as reiterated that in a recent + +• + +C ALM CH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. ' 561-471-2995 , + +111 + +interim order relinquishing jurisdiction on an unrelated case -- a case that goes back to 1995, actually -- and emphasize in that interim order the significance of counsel's stipulation. And so I'm here to make determinations of law, rule, where 6 necessary, but the conduct of the trial is going to 7 largely depend upon lead counsel. + +8 So if you guys formulate a questionnaire of a Page 131 + +/cexpress 16 knowledge with regard to Epstein Rothiteip, which I think are the two broad 16 MR. SCAROLA: Well, my sugges ni)your Honor, 17 is that once the group is assembled, the Court deal 18 with hardship issues in whichever way your Honor 19 ordinarily deals with hardship issues. Anyone who 20 is not asserting a hardship for which they are 21 seeking to be excused and anyone who does not 22 23 24 Ibegories that we need to address. or + +#### 2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session + +9 preliminary manner that you can agree on, you got 10 it. I'm more than willing to accede to that. And 11 if that is sufficient in your view to satisfy the 12 issue of pretrial publicity, knowledge of the 13 circumstances, knowledge of any the partici 14 things of that nature that are critical 15 analysis, then that's satisfactory + +THE COURT: I'm not as concerned with + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +112 + +1 Rothstein particularly now as I am, as I was -- I 2 really -- I've never really been concerned with 3 Rothstein. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: From my perspective, we can + +5 limit it to any knowledge with regard to Epstein. + +6 And I would think this is the defense's primary 7 concern as well. + +8 9 million hits, apparently. THE COURT: Or Mr. There's nine A fte; + +10 MR. SCAROLA: Well, that's true. n 11 those names should be made known t the ors. 12 13 14 Anyone has who recognizes those n nd anyone who hardship n questioned. remains tOA. % e n Vidually + +15 with regard hers, they are given 16 questionnair ey are asked to fill out those 17 question and then they are excused for the 18 bala day. If someone survives individual 19 questioning, they're given a copy of the 20 i^ questionnaire, they fill that out, and they're excused for the balance of the day. + +THE COURT: All right. So let me stop you there so I'm understanding. The questionnaire that 24 you're proposing would be after the initial issues 25 regarding knowledge of any of the participants in + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. • 561-471-2995 + +1 this case? + +2 MR. LINK: That's what I envisioned, your 3 Honor. And I think Rothstein, Epstein all have to 4 be part of that dialogue. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: I don't have a problJLher 6 way. + +7 THE COURT: That's fine. we'll have 8 the opportunity to questio urther. If they 9 say they have heard of c 7 thstein, we will be 10 able to drill down er into that inquiry. + +11 MR. SCARO sir. Anyone who has not 12 heard of a ose three people and does not 13 have s p fills out the questionnaire, leaves 14 with ns uctions to return the following morning. 15 body else is subject to individual voir dire. + +16 THE COURT: I'm thinking about it the other Ae8 to come at the initial point of whether or not any 19 of these people have any knowledge of the 20 protagonists here. way, and I'm thinking the individual voir dire has + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Well, it would. The only people 22 who are excused are those who have no hardship 23 concern to raise and don't know any of the three + +24 people. + +25 THE COURT: But the knowledge of the people + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 has to come first. + +2 MR. LINK: It does, your Honor eve the 3 sequence correct. + +4 THE COURT: Because 5 non-issue. dship becomes a + +6 MR. SCAROLA: fine. + +7 THE COU • y? It's the degree of their 8 knowled y, that will have to be dealt with 9 firs ey have knowledge of a nature that 10 esults n an immediate cause challenge, then we no 11 1 nger have to get into any of the other issues. + +<4(S v MR. SCAROLA: But does your Honor envision two separate individual voir dires? + +-4 :4 THE COURT: No. 777 + +> 15 MR. SCAROLA: So you would want to identify 16 everybody who has knowledge and everybody who is 17 claiming a hardship. + +18 THE COURT: Has knowledge of a + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 19 disqualification nature. And if the grammar is + +20 incorrect, forgive me for the late hour. + +21 So, yes, it would be only those who would 22 be -- who would have knowledge that would subject 23 them to disqualification. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +25 THE COURT: After that, I see no DE cause + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERV , INC. 561-471" 2 + +4 ) 1 I have done it bef d have had remarkable 2 results using Ch Judge Gerber's, then Judge 3 Gerber her Circuit Court, his voir dire 4 colloq rdship. It's excellent. And it is 5 one at 'ye had very, very good success 6 izing. And I have done it in a group. And the oup setting is actually better. + +115 + +MR. SCAROLA: I agree that needs to be done in the group. + +10 The bottom line is that those who survive the 11 initial screening process either because the 12 screening process is not necessary for them or they 13 have come in, been individually questioned and they 14 still qualify, those people all fill out a juror + +15 questionnaire before they leave for the day and 16 they're instructed after filling out the 17 questionnaire to return the following morning. + +18 THE COURT: What are you envisioning -- what 19 are you both envisioning on this questionnaire? + +20 MR. SCAROLA: All of the basic information 21 that takes a long time to gather on di idual 22 basis that we won't need to gather dually; 23 demographic information, magi l s#atus, job 24 history -- + +f• 25 THE COURT: So youth lth kit would be better ;• + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +> > 116 + +1 /434 ith 100 -- let's use 80 as a round. number -- 80 2 ecs people it would be better -- and, Mr. Link, I 0 r .want your thoughts on the subject, too. + +A÷ ; THE COURT: It would be better to give them 6 the questionnaire, have them fill it out in our 7 presence and then dismiss them for the day so that 8 you all could evaluate this information, as opposed 9 to going through the standard questionnaire that I + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +10 have here, which is one we all use with demographic 11 12 13 14 15 16 C40t\_\_ 17 will you be a fair juror in the ca' information, the name, place of domicile, occupation, marital status, spouse's occupation, adult child occupation, prior jury service, parties to any pending or past law suits, similar criminal, knowing anyone in the courtroom -- we'll basically take that out of the equation -- and can you and + +18 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. We i e all that 19 information. We request tional 20 information as well. h 1 out the 21 questionnaires, u tionnaires are gathered, 22 multiple cop' s a made, the Court has one, each 23 side ha a c or more, if they choose to order 24 them and then have a chance to look at them 25 overn t and come back the following day and focus + +2 our voir dire on those questions that need to be asked. + +3 4 5 THE COURT: I'd like to reserve my right to ask the fairness question, so I don't want that included in the questionnaire. + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +117 + +6 MR. SCAROLA: That's fine. + +7 8 9 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Just procedurally, your Honor, I just did this in a case recently in this circuit, is close to what we did. and the procedure requested by Mr. Scarola + +11 12 13 14 15 After the individual got through, th survived the cut, they then filled o C questionnaire, actually down in the r assembly room. They collected the q aires for us, they gave us the copies t, and we came back 16 the next day, and pretty well. + +17 THE COURT' y. So that will be fine. So 18 what we'll uesday is the 100 people that 19 will b ed -- we'll be doing jury selection 20 in 1 36 report there at 9:30 on Tuesday 21 g -- we will go ahead and individually speak 22 to the jurors outside the presence of the remainder. I don't want to do it with the noise. As I said, that would be headache producing 25 within minutes. + +> PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Easiest is just go into the jury 2 room. + +3 4 THE COURT: I think that's the best way to do it. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 And you'll individually question each of the panel after I have introduced everyone, qqr I've" had the opportunity to make them as c9 bte as possible and to explain what we're doing nd why - not why we're doing it, becau don't want to AVI hint at anything -- some r nize the name right off the bat -- t t cate to them that we have agreed that ,- question each of you individually a to find out only preliminary informa erning the matter at hand, and leav ty much at that. + +16 17 then we'll go over with them if they have \2 4/3"..knowledge of Mr. , Mr. Epstein or the Rothstein matter. And I think that's the better way to do it. + +21 22 23 24 Obviously, the reason for my doing it, even though it has not come under attack or objection, is because I don't want the entire 100 people to be tainted by one person spouting something that may be of the nature that could arise here. So to + +2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session 25 avoid that operation -- and, you know, it should be + +#### PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. 561-471-2995 + +119 + +1 pointed out and always keep in mind the cost 2 summon people to jury service is extraordin ly 3 high, and so we don't want to waste yers' 4 money in that respect as well. + +5 All right. So again, o thank and 6 commend each of you for p sentations today, 7 all that participat h directly or indirectly 8 in the present , 11 of your materials. 9 Thank you t•t •urtroom 10 our st tt ney, who's been assisting me. And I 11 wish ujll a pleasant evening. personnel, thank you to + +12 13 away. I ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, you almost got just have a proposed order on the motion to stay that your Honor denied earlier, if I can approach. I gave a copy to Mr. Scarola just a 16 moment ago. + +17 THE COURT: Yes. What you can do tomorrow on 18 the substantive motions -- I'll be at the Bench Bar 19 Conference and you have my permission to track me 20 down. Our schedules are posted, so you'll know + +21 where I'll be. But I'll be doing the civil 22 presentations during the afternoon. There's two of 23 them. So I'll be able to be reached there. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, your Honor. + +25 THE COURT: Thank you again. Have a gr + +1 rest of the week. Thank you-again to our courtroom 2 personnel. We'll be ess. + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES 561-471-2995 + +120 + +3 (Thereupon 4 concluded.) 5. .m., the hearing was + +6 + +7 + +8 ? s ,1 1111V + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 . 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 c + +1 + +2 + +PALM BEACH VG 2:::VICES, INC. 611- \_ + +#### S alef RTIFICATE + +C + +. . + +3 THE STA,GrOFTLORIDA, UNTY OF PALM BEACH. + +4 + +121 + +I, Elaine V. Registered Professional Reporter, State of Flor!!!large, do hereby certify that I was authorized to and did report the above hearing at the time and place herein stated, and that it is a true and correct transcription of my stenotype notes taken during said hearing. + +8 + +I further certify that I am not attorney or 9 counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel of party connected 10 with the action, nor am I financially interested in the action. + +11 + +12 The foregoing certification of this transcript +13 does not apply to any reproduction of the same by any +means unless under the direct control and/or direction +of the certifying reporter. + +14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my +15 hand this 9th day of March, 2018. + +16 + +17 Elaine V. [REDACTED] +18 Notary Public in and for the State of Florida +My Commission Expires 03/27/21 +My Commission #GG 72248 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. +561-471-2995 + +↑ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c69e690c29645c5fa51899cd58b960b2e6bafce0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964/EFTA02765964.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,10901 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02765964.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 249, + "chars": 253091, + "elapsed_seconds": 38.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN \nMOTION TO MAKE COURT RE \n'cif EPSTEIN'S \nNFIDENTIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 357.39794921875, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 357.39794921875, + 583.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 583.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS\n, CRIPTS \nAND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 390.3630676269531 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 390.3630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 351.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 351.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED].", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFI ATE F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 338.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 338.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 683.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 683.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 201.60015869140625, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 201.60015869140625, + 102.463134765625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 102.463134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURT CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 370.9433898925781, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 370.9433898925781, + 75.22210693359375 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 75.22210693359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "12 A#l1SCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.2200164794922, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.5558166503906, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.5558166503906, + 430.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 134.2200164794922, + 430.08416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 248.5777130126953, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 248.5777130126953, + 262.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 262.08416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROk \nN G S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.6599884033203, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 402.1741943359375, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 402.1741943359375, + 381.0831298828125 + ], + [ + 142.6599884033203, + 381.0831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.97998046875, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.5318298339844, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.5318298339844, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 164.97998046875, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session \n10 Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.97000122070312, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 489.1447448730469, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 489.1447448730469, + 111.0831298828125 + ], + [ + 134.97000122070312, + 111.0831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.1578063964844, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.1578063964844, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 446.92779541015625, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 446.92779541015625, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 449.1634216308594, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 449.1634216308594, + 172.9744873046875 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 172.9744873046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript- Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 450.5218200683594, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 450.5218200683594, + 97.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 97.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 452.0318298339844, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 452.0318298339844, + 97.203125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 97.203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.1756286621094, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.1756286621094, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.74998474121094, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.325927734375, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.325927734375, + 134.3231201171875 + ], + [ + 226.74998474121094, + 134.3231201171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.64434814453125, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.64434814453125, + 95.6866455078125 + ], + [ + 167.07600000000002, + 95.6866455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 459.3789978027344, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 459.3789978027344, + 97.57611083984375 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 97.57611083984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.0318298339844, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.0318298339844, + 98.703125 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 98.703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 450.15185546875, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 450.15185546875, + 99.0831298828125 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 99.0831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 450.52587890625, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 450.52587890625, + 97.203125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 97.203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 440.56591796875, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 440.56591796875, + 170.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 170.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.6477966308594, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.6477966308594, + 92.703125 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 92.703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 95.703125 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 95.703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.22998046875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 164.22998046875, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 441.7391662597656, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 441.7391662597656, + 133.963134765625 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 133.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 451.65185546875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 451.65185546875, + 97.963134765625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.9393310546875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.9393310546875, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 459.0106201171875, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 459.0106201171875, + 96.8128662109375 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 96.8128662109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SER \n561-47T-29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 435.74399999999997, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 435.74399999999997, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 324.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.5999755859375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 164.5999755859375, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.8499755859375, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 163.8499755859375, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 482.86800000000005, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 108.53999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 172.963134765625 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 172.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript TAfternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 445.80780029296875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 445.80780029296875, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 446.1643371582031, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 446.1643371582031, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 451.27587890625, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 451.27587890625, + 97.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 459.0083923339844, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 459.0083923339844, + 96.44342041015625 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 96.44342041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 450.7166748046875, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 450.7166748046875, + 133.98199462890625 + ], + [ + 228.88800000000003, + 133.98199462890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. cIRAl4sv\n\u2022 561,471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 503.46221923828125, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 503.46221923828125, + 250.963134765625 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 250.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 457.1518249511719, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 457.1518249511719, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.6343688964844, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.6343688964844, + 96.4390869140625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 96.4390869140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 445.8190002441406, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 445.8190002441406, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 451.2818298339844, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 451.2818298339844, + 99.463134765625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 99.463134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 445.8130187988281, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 445.8130187988281, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.3591613769531, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 444.3591613769531, + 175.58306884765625 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 175.58306884765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 458.6306457519531, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 458.6306457519531, + 97.1485595703125 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 97.1485595703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 \nPALM BEACH,R\u00a3PORmTI SERVICES, INC. \n\u2022 , \u2022 .", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.1599884033203, + 370.3351745605469 + ], + [ + 444.7391662597656, + 370.3351745605469 + ], + [ + 444.7391662597656, + 406.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 216.1599884033203, + 406.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 458.623046875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 458.623046875, + 97.569091796875 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 97.569091796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.36000061035156, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 453.15185546875, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 165.36000061035156, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 451.65185546875, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 451.65185546875, + 98.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 98.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 443.6091613769531, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 443.6091613769531, + 136.203125 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 136.203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.1793212890625, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 446.1793212890625, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 445.80181884765625, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 445.80181884765625, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.84999084472656, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 163.84999084472656, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SE INC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 439.9096984863281, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 439.9096984863281, + 313.47 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 313.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 458.6343688964844, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 458.6343688964844, + 96.775146484375 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 96.775146484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 186, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 454.641845703125, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 454.641845703125, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 172.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 172.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 189, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.0378112792969, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 452.0378112792969, + 97.963134765625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 97.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.2878112792969, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.2878112792969, + 96.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 96.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon. Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 446.1702880859375, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 446.1702880859375, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3.43 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.2718200683594, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 458.2718200683594, + 96.025146484375 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 96.025146484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 449.9741516113281, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 449.9741516113281, + 133.59832763671875 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 133.59832763671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.22998046875, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 452.7818298339844, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 164.22998046875, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 198, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 93.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 93.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.6558837890625, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.6558837890625, + 97.203125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 97.203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.27587890625, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.27587890625, + 96.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 96.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 205, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.2818298339844, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 451.2818298339844, + 96.463134765625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 96.463134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 512.2439999999999, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 164.61000061035156, + 106.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n. 561-471-2995 \u2022 \u2022", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 442.075927734375, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 442.075927734375, + 173.703125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 173.703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.22998046875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 452.77587890625, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 452.77587890625, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 164.22998046875, + 93.96000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Tranicript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 454.2718200683594, + 94.213134765625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 94.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.95999145507812, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.2778015136719, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 454.2778015136719, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 164.95999145507812, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 442.075927734375, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 442.075927734375, + 134.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 134.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session \n4 refusing to provide any discovery on those claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.14999389648438, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 499.52386474609375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 499.52386474609375, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 143.14999389648438, + 106.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.58998107910156, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.141845703125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.141845703125, + 93.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 164.58998107910156, + 93.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SER \n.561-471-29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 221, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 327.0831298828125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 327.0831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 456.141845703125, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 456.141845703125, + 94.5931396484375 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 94.5931396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 224, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 453.8958740234375, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 453.8958740234375, + 93.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 93.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session \n1 2014, '15 and now '18, Mr. Epstein's criminal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.9099884033203, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 473.3702087402344, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 473.3702087402344, + 108.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 141.9099884033203, + 108.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 226, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 445.4359130859375, + 169.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 169.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 227, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 450.52587890625, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 450.52587890625, + 95.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 95.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 450.9058837890625, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 450.9058837890625, + 95.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 95.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 231, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 449.7718200683594, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 449.7718200683594, + 93.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 93.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.2100067138672, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.5278015136719, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.5278015136719, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 164.2100067138672, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 232, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 444.64007568359375, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 444.64007568359375, + 130.5831298828125 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 130.5831298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 234, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.891845703125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.891845703125, + 92.713134765625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 92.713134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.58999633789062, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.8977966308594, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 453.8977966308594, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 164.58999633789062, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript -,Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 448.641845703125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 448.641845703125, + 92.33319091796875 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 92.33319091796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 241, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 450.891845703125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 450.891845703125, + 93.453125 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 93.453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.58999633789062, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 453.5218200683594, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 453.5218200683594, + 91.953125 + ], + [ + 164.58999633789062, + 91.953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC. \n561-471-2995", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 441.31591796875, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 441.31591796875, + 170.3331298828125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 170.3331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 246, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 453.2130432128906, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 453.2130432128906, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 92.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 449.7718200683594, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 449.7718200683594, + 91.5931396484375 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 91.5931396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "S alef RTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.010009765625, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 394.12800000000004, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 394.12800000000004, + 451.213134765625 + ], + [ + 262.010009765625, + 451.213134765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 261 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 232 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 233 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 239 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 228 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 252 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 229 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 231 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 244 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 226 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 245 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 216 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 218 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 231 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 239 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 236 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 224 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 231 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 208 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 223 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 266 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 219 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 263 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 239 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 211 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 235 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 224 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 223 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 245 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 243 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 249 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 246 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 273 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 198 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02765964" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a8d40ec58bb5f4ef4c4149bb01dc106e11eee9e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.md @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XWMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +cOAS + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING AND FILING UNDER SEAL TO PRKSERVE RECORD FOR APPEAL + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to the rulings made by the Court at the March 8, 2018, hearing, hereby files the following documents under seal to preserve his record for appeal pursuant to the Court's direction at the hearing. + +Epstein identified the following exhibits on his March 5, 2018, Cl which the Court has stricken as untimely (Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff claims that the exhibits identified in grey are attorney-client privileged) : + +| Ex. No. 13-1 | No. 02645 | App. No. | +|--------------|-------------|----------| +| 13-2 | 03037 | 54 | +| 13-3 | 03036 | 55 | +| 13-4 | 00149 | 35 | +| 13-5 | 01527 | 3 | +| 13-6 | 04493-04495 | | +| 13-7 | 00014 | 36 | + +&#x27;The Court struck additional exhibits as untimely that Epstein obtained from public records; Epstein has not filed those exhibits under seal but does not waive his rights with regard to those exhibits. + +| Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|-------------|----------| +| 13-8 | 03998-04000 | 6 | +| 13-9 | 02231 | | +| 13-10 | 01300 | | +| 13-11 | 00090 | 37 | +| 13-12 | 02906-02908 | | +| 13-13 | 00133 | 68 | +| 13-14 | 11237 | | +| 13-15 | 08006 | 31 | +| 13-17 | 00026 | 70 | +| 13-18 | 01464 | | +| 13-19 | 01004 | 71 | +| 13-20 | 01403 | | +| 13-21 | 02684-02685 | 51 | +| 13-22 | 01475 | | +| 13-24 | 03694 | 79 | +| 13-25 | 12289 | 33 | +| 13-26 | 01166 | 38 | +| 13-27 | 01258 | 72 | +| 13-28 | 15113-15114 | | +| 13-30 | 26481 | | +| 13-31 | 26394 | | +| 13-33 | 25922 | | +| 13-34 | 26480 | 60 | +| 13-35 | 26356 | | +| 13-36 | 26570 | | +| 13-37 | 00992 | | +| 13-40 | 01423 | 7 | +| 13-41 | 05071 | | +| 13-43 | 02043 | 81 | +| 13-44 | 03731-03732 | | +| 13-45 | 06406-06408 | | +| 13-46 | 01686 | 48 | +| 13-47 | 11123-11125 | 50 | +| 13-48 | 02088 | | +| 13-49 | 11126-11127 | 32 | +| 13-50 | 11128-11131 | 49 | +| 13-51 | 08459 | | +| 13-52 | 25925 | | +| 13-53 | 25874 | | +| 13-54 | 08348-08349 | | +| 13-55 | 08355 | | +| 13-56 | 11145 | | +| 13-60 | 03191-03192 | 4 | +| 13-61 | 27284 | 87 | + +| Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|------------------------|---------------| +| 13-62 | 26893 | 89 | +| 13-64 | 01255 | | +| 13-65 | 26836-26837 | 90, 91 | +| 13-66 | 04398-04402 | 2, 34 | +| 13-67 | 04408-04412 | 1 | +| 13-68 | 26807 | 92 | +| 13-69 | 26808-26809 | 93 | +| 13-70 | 27379 | 94 | +| 13-71 | 27293 | 95 | +| 13-72 | 26021 | 63 | +| 13-73 | 27270 | 96 | +| 13-74 | 27355 | 97 | +| 13-75 | 27325 | 100 | +| 13-77 | 27322 | 101 | +| 13-78 | 26777-26781 | | +| 13-79 | 26782-26786 | 102, 103, 104 | +| 13-80 | 26088-26089 | 105 | +| 13-81 | 25998 | 52 | +| 13-83 | 27072 | 108 | +| 13-85 | Legamaro
Depo Ex 6 | | +| 13-86 | 26747 | 11 | +| 13-88 | 08042-08044 | 16 | +| 13-89 | 26741-26742 | 13, 15 | +| 13-90 | 08059-08061 | 17 | +| 13-92 | 27522 | 109 | +| 13-93 | 26756-26758 | 9 | +| 13-94 | 08036-08038 | 19 | +| 13-96 | Legamaro
Production | | +| 13-97 | 26762 | 8 | +| 13-98 | 01117 | 21 | +| 13-99 | 27051-20752 | 112 | +| 13-100 | 08121-08123 | 20 | +| 13-101 | 26749-26752 | 23 | +| 13-102 | 08128-08130 | 24 | +| 13-103 | 08118-08120 | 22 | +| 13-104 | 08131-08133 | 25 | +| 13-105 | 08124-08126 | 26 | +| 13-106 | 08135-08138 | 10 | +| 13-107 | 27494 | 27 | +| 13-108 | 26760 | | +| 13-109 | 27025 | 111 | +| 13-110 | 25997 | 28 | + +| Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|-------------|----------| +| 13-111 | 25937 | 67 | +| 13-112 | 26973 | 84 | +| 13-113 | 26604-26605 | 56 | +| 13-114 | 26737 | 57 | +| 13-115 | 26485 | 57 | +| 13-116 | 07019-07021 | | +| 13-117 | 27013 | 58 | + +Epstein is simultaneously filing a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential pursuant to the 15ih Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 in order for the C maintain these documents under seal. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court' e- tug portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> OCKENBACH, PA ) 4555 Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 (West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + ++o + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kam Berard Rockeubach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scottelinlaocklaw.cotn Primary: Kara@link-rocklaw.com Primary: Rachel(Thlinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linlaocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: EserviceelinkTocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31e14dc352910ea3033f7fbcbdf9318c87a46c39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213/EFTA02766213.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766213.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 13715, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.464, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 319.464, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING \nAND FILING UNDER SEAL TO PRKSERVE RECORD FOR APPEAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 536.7839965820312, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 536.7839965820312, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 297.3630676269531 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 297.3630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766213" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a351bcc1d67de7a663f13ba65c90a19a27720206 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800=O1MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND -'NFitEY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL O 17ON WITHIN COURT FILING AND NOTICE OF UNDER SEAL + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je ("Epstein"), pursuant to the rulings made by the Court at the March 8, 2018, heagd y files the following under seal: + +## "Epstein Bate Stamp" + +Epstein is simul mg a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential pursuant to the 15th Judicial Abu C' it's strative Order 2.303-9/09 in order for the Clerk to maintain the disc under se(5N + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Frt, ) Primary: Scon®lin ockljtw.corn Primary: Karlalinkrocklaw.com Primary: Radhel(a)linkrocklaw.com Second : Tinagplinkrocklaw.com Seco Tr ' linkrocklaw.com rvicealinkrocklaw.com + +tinsel for Plaintift7Counter-Defendant Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

██████████ Nurik
Nurik
Fices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

██████████ Nurik
Nurik
Fices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d688af18465c070cc63abcabb4a0c9f4713fe54d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218/EFTA02766218.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766218.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 9626, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND -'NFitEY EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL O 17ON WITHIN COURT FILING \nAND NOTICE OF UNDER SEAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 534.8154296875, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 534.8154296875, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"Epstein Bate Stamp\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 397.310302734375, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 397.310302734375, + 464.60302734375 + ], + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 464.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766218" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5a89c1666805ced609fbf82d990bcb9387bd4e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.md @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant, + +L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +cos + +## RESPONSE' TO EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH 8,2018 HEARING TRANSCRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S RULINGS + +Plaintiff, J. , by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Rulings, and in support states as follows: + +## THE COURT'S RULINGS + +Epstein's notice d t include the following rulings2 by the Court: + +- Defendat tein is prohibited from making any use of the 724 late-disclosed exhibitr%jIernoon Session, 3/8/18 at 59:18-21 Epstein is barred from referrin hose records as it relates to thenuments that were gathered from or from any other source that would have included those records that were the subject of Judge Ray's order. + +&#x27; This Response was inadvertently filed during the stay ordered by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. is refais Response now that the stay has been partially lifted, in an abundance of caution. + +2understands Epstein's Notice to be solely related to those rulings that directly i late-disclosed exhibits or the documents and privileged materials that are the subject of Judge Ray's order therefore has not included other rulings made by the Court at the March 8, 2018 hearing, such as t 's reservation as to attorney's fees the Court's directive that additional supplemental relief may be sought by and the Intervenors related to the disc, or rulings related to other motions that were heard by the Court. + +adv. Epstein + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +' Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +This order precludes anything coming in through the back door which would not be allowed through the front. Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 at 75:24-76:6. + +## EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE + +The Notice states that Epstein, and his attorneys, are complying with the Co .4.; 's rulings by, inter alio: + +- On March 8, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its o-c 1 (Jack Goldberger), its litigation team working on this matter, anciits e , Timothy Chinaris, to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents obtained from the disc and any copies of the disc that they had in\_their possession. ,c- + +- \ i, While these actions may be appropriate steps in complying with Court's order, they fall far short of addressing all of the concerns that arise out of tfte,mtaut1orized access to, retention of, and use of privileged materials. First, nothing sho royed that has not first been accurately catalogued with all information preserved ev how, when, from whom, and by whom it was created and received and to whom c distributed. Second, all other documents containing information derived from Edw ileged documents must also be gathered and catalogued. This includes, but is no !air, ' ited to, email correspondence, internal memos, attorney's notes, prepared trial materials (s h as prepared examination of any witnesses), and all the records relating to services performed concerning the privileged materials. Third, the limitation of referenceto\n14 Rockenbach P.A., Epstein, and Jack Goldberger, Esq. is clearly inadequate when nume ous other attorneys and personnel have been engaged in rendering services to Epstein in the many years since the defense improperly created and retained the privileged documents. Every Epstein agent must be included in the information retrieval process. + +The Court was very clear that its order "precludes anything coming in through the back door which would not be allowed through the front," and therefore serves this Response + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +to ensure that all documents, whether in hard copy or electronic form, that in any way reference, refer to or contain the privileged materials have been gathered and catalogued and that no relevant information is destroyed in the process of addressing these critical privilege concerns. + +again renews his right to seek sanctions for any further violation of udge Ray's order, or the March 8, 2018 rulings of this Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoi f safit via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 219 day of March, 2018. + +> JACK Flori 9440 DAVE,, VI E JR. Ho o.: 115179 -Mails: isxfasearcvlaw.com; and ®searcylaw.com CA E-Mail: \_scarolatetun®searcylaw.com y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +Jay Howell & Associates +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +644 Cesery Boulevard, #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Attorney for Intervenors + +adv. Epstein + +Case No. 502009CA040800X7C0CMBAG + +Response to Epstein's Notice of Service of Court's March 8, 2018 Hearing Transcripts and Compliance with Court's Ruling + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorney for Intervenors + +A Goes \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80cd9cc2546d57aba97d53c04e5cb56d4e8fe94f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221/EFTA02766221.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766221.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6524, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE' TO EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH 8,2018 \nHEARING TRANSCRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 526.932, + 370.10302734375 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 370.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 376.635009765625, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 376.635009765625, + 478.85302734375 + ], + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 478.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 384.09136962890625, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 384.09136962890625, + 175.92352294921875 + ], + [ + 231.33599999999998, + 175.92352294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 119.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766221" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1461305916977ab41243637caaa6fca21d582d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.md @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 4.4 1 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### t iC PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENICANI\PEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION TO UNILATERALISETTING OF MARCH 22, 2018 UMCEARING + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je ("Epstein') objects to the unilateral setting of the March 22, 2018, UMC and brings this Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. to the Court's attention pursuant to The Florida Bar's Professionalism Expecta Professionalism Expectations") and the Palm Beach County Bar Association's S of Professional Courtesy and Civility ("Standards'), and states: + +## BACKGROUND + +- n March 20, 2018, at 3:50 p.m., the Fourth District Court of Appeal granted motion to lift the stay of this case, in part. +- 2. On March 20, 2018, at 4:48 p.m., counsel, David P. Vitale, Jr., of the Searcy Denny law firm, requested undersigned counsel's availability on Thursday, March 22, 2018, for a status conference UMC hearing. + +3. Undersigned counsel promptly responded and advised that they had a conflict on March 22, 2018. Counsel thereafter agreed to schedule a UMC hearing on Monday, March 26, 2018. + +4. On March 20, 2018, at 5:47 p.m., counsel filed a Motion for Status Conference and a Notice of Hearing, setting the Motion for UMC hearing on March 26, 2018, as A agreed. + +5. On March 21, 2018, at 5:21 a.m., Jack Scarola of the S ASn ny law firm demanded to know the basis for unsigned counsel's unavailability 2, 2018, stating, "In the absence of a reasonable explanation for the delay, V ' en appear before Hafele tomorrow to address the rescheduling of pretrial issues a t 'al. + +6. Although not required to provide/Suc a etailed explanation, undersigned counsel, in the spirit of professionalism and s " expected of both counsel set out in the Standards, advised Mr. Scarola of th flic out-of-town travel). A copy of the e-mail exchange starting with Mr. Vitale's attached as Exhibit A. + +7. Mr. Scarola re t unilaterally re-noticed th fi 'ng for March 22, 2018, knowing undersigned counsel is not ccept undersigned counsel's representations and instead, available. + +AS + +Nit...) tatewide level, Professionalism Expectation 6.6 requires Epstein's counsel to present this objection and promptly call this scheduling problem to the Court's attention: + +# ARGUMENT + +A lawyer should promptly call potential scheduling conflicts or problems to the attention of those affected, including the court or tribunal. + +Epstein's counsel fully complied with *Professionalism Expectation 6.5* which requires an attorney to "promptly agree to a proposed time for a hearing, deposition, meeting or other proceeding or make his or her own counter proposal of time. + +Despite Epstein's counsel's efforts and offer of the very next uniform motion calendar date held by this Court, [REDACTED] failed to comply with *Professionalism Expectation 6.4*: + +A lawyer should accede to all reasonable requests for scheduling, rescheduling, cancellations, extensions, and postponements that do not prejudice the client's opportunity for full, fair, and prompt adjudication. + +Even more close to home, Local Rule 4 requires a Notice of Hearing be served "pursuant to the applicable rules of procedure, and the Standards of Professional Courtesy and Civility ("Standards"), which have been endorsed by the Judges of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit." Those Standards provide: + +### **I. Scheduling** + +1. Attorneys should endeavor to provide opposing counsel and pro se litigants (collectively, "opposing counsel"), parties, witnesses, and other affected persons, sufficient notice of depositions, hearings and other proceedings, except upon agreement of counsel, in an emergency, or in other circumstances compelling more expedited scheduling. As a general rule, actual notice should be given that is no less than five (5) business days for in-state depositions, ten (10) business days for out-of-state depositions and five (5) business days for hearings. + +2. Attorneys should communicate with opposing counsel prior to scheduling depositions, hearings and other proceedings, so as to schedule them at times that are mutually convenient for all interested persons. Further, sufficient time should be reserved to permit a complete presentation by counsel for all parties. Upon receiving an inquiry concerning a proposed time for a hearing, deposition, meeting or other proceeding, a lawyer should promptly agree to the proposal or offer a counter suggestion that is as close in time as is reasonably available, and attorneys should cooperate with each other when conflicts and calendar changes are reasonably necessary. Only after making a reasonable effort to confer with opposing counsel should attorneys unilaterally schedule depositions, hearings or other matters. + +(Emphasis added.) + +Furthermore, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090(d) provides, "A copy of any written motion which may not be heard ex parte and a copy of the notice of hearing thereof shall be served a reasonable time before the time specified for the hearing." (Emphasis added.) + +Undersigned counsel was readily willing to professionally forego the five-business-day notice requirements of the Standards and agreed to set the status conference on Mon y, March 26, 2018 — two-business days after the Thursday, March 22, 2018, date initia sed by counsel. ' counsel agreed to the March 26, 2018, date g r d then aboutfaced and demanded that the hearing be held on March 22, 2018. + +There is no emergency that requires that the hearing el March 22, 2018, and be hearing} will not prejudiced by a two-business day de y. in, on the other hand, will be prejudiced if the Court goes forward with the h ' \ ' t representation by counsel, who will be out of the state. Undersigned counse eiiii pt in responding to requests for hearing time, and the hearing was initially set cprlp a -upon date on the Court's following motion calendar date, Monday, March 2 violation of the Professiona Courtesy and Civility, 8 ards' counsel, on the other hand, has acted in ctations identified above, the Standards of Professional e 4, and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure by unilaterally setting the hearin a da Epstein's counsel is not available. + +Furth counsel stated that one of the purposes of the status conference is to addt heduling of pretrial issues and trial, however the trial setting has not been resolved by the Fourth District Court of Appeal and such a request is improper and in violation of the Fourth District Court of Appeal's Order. + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the March 22, 2018, UMC hearing be cancelled and rescheduled to Monday, March 26, 2018. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Frt, ) Primary: Scott®lin ockljtw.corn Primary: Karaalinkrocklaw.com Primary: Radhcl(a)linkrocklaw.com Second : Tinaalinkrocklaw.com Seco Tr linkrocklaw.com rvicealinkrocklaw.com + +tinsel for Plaintift7Counter-Defendant Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +| Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepasearcylaw.com | Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLAppellateLaw.com | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| jsx@searcylaw.com | njs®FLAppellateLaw.com | +| dvitale@,searcylaw.com | kbt(WWFLAnpellateLaw.corn | +| scarolateanasearcvlaw.com terryteam®searcylaw.com Co-Counseetlendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. | Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter- Hawn)) J. Lh...1 | +| J. | Marc S. urik | +| Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@epllc.com Co-Counstifiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P 250 Australian Avenue S., Suit West Palm Beach, FL 33401 iaoldberger@agwpa.com | Law Offices am S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marcRnuriklaw.com Copnsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 casse1100,1aw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. | +| stnahoneyOagwpa.com | and Jane Doe | +| Co-Counsel for Plai tiff% Jeffrey Epstein +0 | un er-Defendant Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 jayhowell.com Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe | + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Tina L. + +From: Scott J. Link Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 10:06 AM To: Jack Scarola Cc: Tina L IMIE; Phil Burlington; Paul Cassell; njs@flappellatelaw.com; Mary McCann; Kimberly Marsh; Karen E. Terry; Kara Berard Rockenbach; Ackerman; jay@jayhowell.com; David P. Vitale Jr.; Chris R. Rodgers; brittany@epllc.com; brad@epllc.com Subject: Re: Regarding: M, adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) + +Jack I thought we all agreed to reset. Your request is inconsistent with the standards of professiopitiim. I take it from now on we will just challenge each other when we say were unavailable. Kara and I will be in NS York. I will see you on Monday + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: scott linkrocklaw.com + +![](_page_7_Picture_5.jpeg) + +CIVIL TRIAL & APPELLATE LAW is e-mail may contain privileged or confidential ormation. If it is not meant for you, please elete it and notify us immediately. Please + +C confirm receipt of time sensiti communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. < \ + +On Mar 21, 2018, a ack Scarola wrote: + +Please infor e of the basis for the unavailability of any of Epstein's lawyers to attend either in person or by telephone a simple status conference tomorrow. In the absence of a reasonable explanation for delay, I Intend to appear before Hafele tomorrow to address the rescheduling of pretrial issues and trial. + +Every additional day of delay stands the obvious chance of further prejudicing our client. + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 5:03 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Mary- Please set the Motion for Status Conference for UMC on Monday. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Office: 561-686.6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dyitale@searcylaw.com www.searcylaw.com + +From: Scott J. Link (mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com] Sent: March 20, 2018 5:00 PM To: David P. Vitale Jr. Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Tina L. ; Kimberly Marsh ; Mary McCann ; Jack Scarola ; Chris R. Rodgers ; Kare E\Terry Subject: Re: Regarding: adv. Epstein (File 8: 291874) + +I can make that work. Go ahead notice it. Thank you + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation 4 AC) + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA A, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite. 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 Email: scott linkrocklaw.com + + + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 4:54 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Okay. How about Monday? + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Office: 561-686-6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dvitale@searcvlaw.com www.searcvlaw.com + +From: Scott J. Link imailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) + +Sent: March 20, 2018 4:53 PM + +To: David P. Vitale Jr. + +Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Tina L. + +; Kimberly Marsh ; Mary McCan + +; Jack Scarola ; Chris R. Rod ' + +. Karen E. Terry + +Subject: Re: Regarding: adv. Epstein (File 291874) + +Yes David that's what it means. + +Scott J. Link + +Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., SuiteSS + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 + +Email: scottalinkrocklaw.com + + + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 4:52 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Sorry, but does that mean that neither you or Kara are available for hearing on Thursday? + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dvitale@searcvlaw.com www.searcvlaw.com + +From: Scott J. Link (mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com] Sent: March 20, 2018 4:50 PM To: David P. Vitale Jr. Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Tina L. ; Kimberly Marsh ; Mary McCann • Jack Scarola , Chris R. Rodgers ; Karen E. Terry Subject: Re: Regarding: adv. Epstein (File #: .29 JIZt\ + +David this Thursday isn't going to work what availability do ,,y & v r early next week? Scott + +14/ ..) + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 Email: scott(&linkrocklaw.com + + + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because (email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. Ve do not provide tax advice. Our ommunications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 4:48 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Scott/Kara, + +We are filing a Motion for Status Conference today, which we intend to notice for UMC on Thursday. Please let us know if you are available for hearing. + +Thank you, +David + +--- + +**David P. Vitale Jr., Esq.** +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Office: 561-686-6300 +Cell: 561-613-9368 +Fax: 561-383-9465 +[dvitale@searcylaw.com](mailto:dvitale@searcylaw.com) +[www.searcylaw.com](http://www.searcylaw.com) + + +\*\*\*\*\* + +\*\*\*\*\* + +| Privileged and Confidential | Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. + +\*\*\*\*\* + +\*\*\*\*\* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39ac2634d441641b36b402e95f97ab8003e86f8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/EFTA02766226.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,576 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 20346, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.49, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_5.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "t iC\nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENICANI\\PEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nOBJECTION TO UNILATERALISETTING OF MARCH 22, 2018 \nUMCEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 342.1182556152344 + ], + [ + 478.49932861328125, + 342.1182556152344 + ], + [ + 478.49932861328125, + 396.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 396.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 352.2318115234375, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 352.2318115234375, + 559.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 559.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.832, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 344.6252136230469, + 555.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 266.832, + 555.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Scheduling", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766226" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/_page_7_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/_page_7_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d07a87609f5f0a9ef10419ecda0b75aee29debc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766226/_page_7_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f3b8d4e809df21a527a9bf4ad4430edc42f8d40eeb5ebd6141d11a882184c078 +size 11545 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c87d8e62b71d1700594ebc98bcca1389a49c270 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s). cos + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the, undssigried has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 26, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable DonaCHafe + +PLACE: 205 N. Dbrie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D- + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the reliejsought in the motion. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22ND day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +l adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of I learing + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; i ou are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvàlida que necesita aigrin acomodarnien ara poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gagtosiv os, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en èontacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dies antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de rccibir esta notificaciôn si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia qu programado es menos de 7 dlas; si usted tiene discapacitación del oido o de\_M ame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Id enfim ki bezwen akomo w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou en pwovizyon pou jwen kèk Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ow(ge ndevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resenv on k syon an si Iè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen m pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +? S' + ++ C) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39b4beb5f13a6ccb315889960eddc9a9ade40b87 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238/EFTA02766238.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766238.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5001, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.3334045410156, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.3334045410156, + 331.863037109375 + ], + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 331.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 428.888671875, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 428.888671875, + 548.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 548.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 143.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766238" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f876e58fc7c2685817d45b3dc7f7bfcc8fd965f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and + +individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +0 + +## ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES EXPERT WITNESS, DR. BERNARD JANSEN 1S ND.TO t. EXCLUDE HIS TESTIMONY + +7 + +THIS MATTER, coming before t or hearing on March 8, 2018, on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstetttts ( tein") Motion to Strike Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Damages Expert Witness, Dr. Bernard Jansen, and to Exclude His Testimony, and the Court having reviewed the Motion and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. ) Response in Opposition, having heard argument of counsel, and being fully advised, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein's Motion is DENIED. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Co nty, Florida this-74 day of March, 2018. + +> THE HONO ALD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT OURTJU GE + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39982e60e14d428affaa682f9be228c2f6694c06 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243/EFTA02766243.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766243.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 6549, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES \nEXPERT WITNESS, DR. BERNARD JANSEN 1S ND.TO t. EXCLUDE HIS TESTIMONY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 530.2642822265625, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 530.2642822265625, + 365.60302734375 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 365.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 345.16799999999995, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 166.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766243" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2235b05d6391259c0c9d984f4ab22d2d0a6a040 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## /Th ORDER DENYING IN PART AND RESERVING IN PART ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IN LIMINE OF UNRELATED (ETTLEMENTS + +coS + +THIS MATTER coming before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein"), Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements, and the Court having heard argument of counsel on February 28, 2018, and considered Defendant/Counter-Plaint i ff J. ) Response in Opposition, and being fully advised, it is + +ORDERED that Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine is denied as it relates to the three claimants represented by Testimony and evidence relating to the settlements paid by Eps into the three claimants known as L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, either in the aggregate or individually, will be admissible. + +IT IS FURTHER ordered that the Court reserves ruling on Epstein's Motion as it relates to all other tort claimants not directly represented by pending further argument before the Court. At that hearing, the Court will also hear arguments concerning the admissibility of the + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]'s +15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order Denying in Part and Reserving in Part on +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's +Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of +Unrelated Settlements +Page 2 + +aggregate number of claims settled by Epstein in the two years preceding and subsequent to the +filing of the initial Complaint, as well as the related aggregated settlement amounts thereto. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26 day +of March, 2018. + +THE HONORABLE DONALD W. HAFELE +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. Edwards

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
nis@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Bradley J. Edwards
Edwards Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and.. J. 15m Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Denying in Part and Reserving in Part on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements Page 3 + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5335ac10808f78a0d454dfd98e77a47667fd5f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245/EFTA02766245.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766245.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 7721, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "/Th \nORDER DENYING IN PART AND RESERVING IN PART ON \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IN LIMINE \nOF UNRELATED (ETTLEMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.088, + 297.9527587890625 + ], + [ + 468.5583801269531, + 297.9527587890625 + ], + [ + 468.5583801269531, + 380.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 137.088, + 380.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 349.92 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766245" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f050c05ddc038d72e657e8219d52b70eed7db67 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No 50-2009CA0,10800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +laiiiiT TIfigaiividually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## C S AGREED ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION + +0 + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court by agreement of the parties upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion in Limine as to Sex Offender Registry Information. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and being advised of the agreement of the parties, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, because the Motion is limited to the punitive damages phase of the trial, the Motion is deferred until the amount of punitive damages will be tried if the jury determines Defendant/Counter-Plaintia J. in the first phase of trial. ' entitlement to punitive damages + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Be eel. 2018. each County, Florida this2'day + +> CUI BLE DONALD W. HAFELE URT JUDGE + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb6f7b88470d4f5c38fe591df1949cbadb82440a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248/EFTA02766248.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766248.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 6555, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "C S\nAGREED ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-\nDEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO SEX \nOFFENDER REGISTRY INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 281.6137390136719 + ], + [ + 492.2281494140625, + 281.6137390136719 + ], + [ + 492.2281494140625, + 343.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 343.4730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 154.71 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766248" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d18b07c817e82847ceeca75a8217648e2aa4f149 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +AGREED ORDER ON [REDACTED] MOTION TO EXPAND INTERROGATORIES + +THIS MATTER came before this Court on Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED], Motion to Expand the number of Interrogatories. This Court having reviewed the motion and having been advised that there is no objection to the entry of the Order, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the motion is GRANTED as follows: + +1. 1. The Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED], has already propounded 68 interrogatories with subparts. The Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED], shall not propound any more interrogatories without leave of court. +2. 2. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, EPSTEIN, has already propounded 19 interrogatories with subparts. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, EPSTEIN, shall be permitted to propound an additional 49 interrogatories, inclusive of subparts, without further leave of court. +3. 3. If any party desires to propound more than 68 interrogatories, including subparts, leave of court must be obtained in advance. + +FILED +2010 OCT -6 PM 1:53 +STATE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +Epstein v. [REDACTED], et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order on [REDACTED] Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 5th +day of October, 2010. + +![]()DAVID F. CROW +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. +JB + +Epstein v. [REDACTED], et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Agreed Order on [REDACTED] Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fdf59750bb8c0d30616568a60fdeb048cec7b60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250/EFTA02766250.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766250.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2765, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON [REDACTED] MOTION TO EXPAND INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.215, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 521.913, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 521.913, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 82.215, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.547, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 347.8109999999999, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 347.8109999999999, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 255.547, + 158.76 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766250" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa49600fe48f782a65f2b8085d2cff88c6ee8266 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.md @@ -0,0 +1,391 @@ +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +O S + +( 1) + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE TO DEFENDANT/CO NOTICE FOR T CAINTIFF OBJECTION CASE STYLE + +Plaintifttounter-Defendant, Jeffre Trial of Severed objects to unilateral ("Epstein"), moves to strike the Notice for t Jeffrey Epstein filed on March 20, 2018, and e case style, and states: + +Defendan icteraElaintiff for Trial sho c e S s ken because the case is not at issue and the filing is in violation of the Fourth Dis • ) urt of Appeal's March 20, 2018 Order lifting the stay of this case "in part" to allow the March 20, 2018, Notice lution of "pending" and other "pretrial" matters as represented to the appellate court were necessary. Incredibly, while the very issue of is pending on appeal and matters relating to setting the trial of counterclaim clearly remain subject to the stay issued by the Fourth District Court of Appeal, has filed a Notice for Trial of + +### ,INTRODUCTION + +counterclaim that is once again in violation of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440 and currently beyond the limited jurisdiction conferred on this Court when the appellate court only partially lifted its stay. Therefore, Epstein requests that this Court enter an Order striking Notice for Trial. + +In addition, the unilateral revision of the case style is error and should be rejected by this Court. Epstein asks this Court to grant its motion to strike invitation eate clear error. BACKGROUND 04 + +1. On March 20, 2018, the Fourth District Court ntered its Order lifting the stay of this matter only in part, specifically finding ( h shall continue to apply "to the trial of the underlying matter." (Exhibit A.) + +2. Less than two hours after the "Silcstrict Court of Appeal granted requested relief "in part" from the appeJMt ards filed his "Notice for Trial of Severed Claim Against Stein." (Exhibit B.) also filed a Motion for Status Conference. + +3. re Notice for Trial clearly ignores the express jurisdictional limits on this Co tabli ed when the Fourth District Court of Appeal accepted, jurisdiction of the two court orders under review (trial and of the counterclaim), consof appeals for panel purposes, and staved, this trial court action for purposes of trial. noticing his counterclaim as a stand alone new lawsuit is an action toward moving a severed part of this case to trial, while the appeal is pending, and is in clear + +has submitted numerous proposed orders to undersigned counsel with this inappropriate case style change and others. Epstein has objected to the unilateral — without Court approval — case style changes in any proposed orders or prospective filings. + +violation of the appellate stay. Epstein has already raised the issue to the appellate court by way of motion to show cause. (Exhibit C.) + +4. Additionally, unilateral change of the circuit court style of this case — Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG — is in clear violation of Florida law and the Fourth District Court of Appeal's stay order of the proceedings. It strains credulity to believe that construed the appellate court's stay orders to mean that had a t from the Fourth District Court of Appeal to advance to trial with his cotmtercl int, change his 9-year designation from counterplaintiff to plaintiff, and remove Rothstein m t c e caption. + +5. Both Epstein's Petition for Writ of Mand on Rule 1.440) and Epstein's Petition for Writ of Certiorari (relating to th I 's order severing interrelated counterclaim from Epstein's main cl ' ending before the Fourth District i .) \N ., Court of Appeal. The outcome of those ap w have a direct impact on how this case proceeds, and it is therefore premature f dwa to either notice this matter for trial or change the case caption. .....e + +C ARGUMENT Notice rial of counterclaim demonstrates a fundamental contempt for the icti of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, which has expressly stayed setting this c trial while Epstein's two Petitions for Writs are pending before the appellate court. lear violation of the stay and must be stricken. It is impossible that somehow failed to comprehend that the two pending appeals pertain to when this matter may be "at issue" and ready to set for trial and whether the trial will proceed as a combined claim and counterclaim or not. Notice for Trial completely ignores that the Fourth District Court is reviewing the and "at issue" trial orders, and is in effect a declaration that the Fourth District Court's stay and review are meaningless. This Court should not countenance such disrespect for the appellate process and the jurisdiction of the Fourth District Court of Appeal. + +Even if Epstein's Petitions were not pending on appeal with a stay in place, a' Notice for Trial would still be premature. That is, in his haste to notice his counterclaim for trial, failed to properly calculate when tun, action could be at issue pursuant rida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440. Assuming that was proper and had hallenged by at issue until 20 days after the entry of the Court's March 13, 2018, Order — th jga b ril 2.2018. However, Epstein's Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the severed claim would this case was stayed for eleven days (from March 9, means that theoretically the first day a proper not' This date would be valid for the "at issue" It,' 's /there was no appeal of the order pending, which clearly there is. s Ifr~tfgh March 20, 2018), which could be filed is April 13. 2018. + +Furthermore, tr ilaterally change the style of the case or rename the parties after he chose to fl a terclaim and be a counter-plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Epstein. Pursua wick's Florida Practice and Procedure. § 6:2, "the names of the parties in the are never changed even when all original parties have ceased to be parties." In n where there is a dispute over the proper identity of a party (not here) and a party frlQJetion requesting a name change (not here), changing the case style is error without an evidentiary hearing. See Musicians Exch. Downtown Cafe, Inc. v. Mercede City Ctr., Inc., 613 So. 2d 134, 136 (Fla. 4i° DCA 1993). + +### CONCLUSION + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court strike a' Notice for + +Trial and order to comply with the case style in all pleadings and proposed orders. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 23° , 2018, through the Court's c-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E Te David P. V Searcy, D • la, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 h Lakes Boulevard West Pal each, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsx(Wsearcylaw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terrvteamasearcylaw.com Co-Counselcoalendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +02991) Scott J. L + +bach (FBN 44903) !Cara Be + +(FBN 577251) Rache + +linkrocklaw.com Pri + +: araalinkrocklaw.com + +. Rachellalinkrocklaw.com + +dary: Tinaelinkrocklaw.com + +ndary: Trov@linkrocklaw.com + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boul te 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 3 (561) 727-3600; (561) 7 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Li + +Ac kati Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmbO,FLArmellateLaw.com njseFLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or + +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE OF COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 20, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB +AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that Respondent's March 12, 2018 motion is granted in part. The stay of proceedings granted by this Court's March 9, 2018 order shall apply only to the trial of the underlying matter. Respondent's request for expedited consideration is denied. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach John Scarola +Philip M. Burlington Scott J. Link +Nichole J. Segal Rachel Jenny Glasser +Clerk Palm Beach Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Marc S. Nurik +Jack Alan Goldberger +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +dl + +![]()**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_7_Picture_119.jpeg) + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCO11' ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +### NOTICE FOR TRIAL OF EIAVAC)S' SEVERED CLAIM AGAINST JEFFRccEPSTEIN + +J. a '), by Stro gh undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.440(6), hereby files this Notice + +malicious prose against Epstein is at issue and is ready to be set for trial. expects the trial e approximately ten (10) days to try before a jury. The trial t is on claim for stio• us prosecution against Epstein. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009 MBAG Notice for Trial ' Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of March, 2018. + +M AROLA Aas art & Shipley, P.A. + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): nunccann®searcyla Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney 2139 Palm West Pal Phone: Fax: 5 ; and @searcylaw.com Boulevard orida 33409 300 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein + +Page 4 of 4 + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT + +Appellate Case No.: 4D18-0762 + +LT Case No: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Petitioner/Plaintiff, + +4,14111"\' + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and ( 14/ Y .' individually, + +j')C) Respondents/Defendants. + +## PETITIONER'S MOTION FOF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 20, 2018, GRANTING "IN PART" MOTION FOR P IAL RELIEF FROM STAY + +Petitioner, Jeffrey Ep C i stein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, moves thi urt for an Order to Show Cause why is not in violation oft • o Order dated March 20, 2018, which granted only "in part" oti f r partial relief from stay, and states: + +## Introduction + +violated this Court's Order granting requested relief to lift stay only "in part" because he moved, in less than two hours after entry of that order, to notice his counterclaim for trial despite the fact that this very issue is still pending before this Court, was not part of the relief granted and is clearly part of this Court's remaining stay order: applying to "trial of the underlying matter." Both Epstein's pending petition for writ of mandamus (based on Rule 1.440) and Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari (relating to the trial court's order severing IM' interrelated counterclaim from Epstein's main claim) emanated from one hearing and are pending before this Court. This Court is reviewing the propriety of th 1 court's rulings denying the mandatory aspect of Rule 1.440 and bi AiiZA l counterclaim, allowing it to proceed to trial despite it being' "action" that was prematurely noticed for trial by circuit court. and c erly set for trial by the + +In his motion, expressly t i Court that his purpose for seeking a partial lift of the stay was to ad ending" matters before the trial court, including pretrial motions, ob to deposition designations, jury instructions and the like. However, o eh persuaded the Court to grant this limited relief, t sought to bl the door wide open with a hastily filed (in less than two hours) Notic al of "Severed" Claim (which, as Epstein has made clear on , is really a counterclaim inextricably intertwined with Epstein's claim in e same action that was improperly set for trial). + +current attempt to proceed to trial on his severed claim violated this Court's express order that the "March 9, 2018 [stay of proceedings] order shall apply only to the trial of the underlying matter." Therefore, this Court should issue an Order to Show Cause Why should not be Held in Violation of this Court's Order dated March 20, 2018. + +## Areument and Record Basis for Show Cause Order + +This Court has two pending petitions for relief before it, consolid for panel purposes - this mandamus appeal and the interrelated Petition for • of Certiorari (Case No. 4D18-0787).1 Given the nature of the proceeding eading toward trial and standards governing mandamus relief, ourt granted Epstein's emergency motion for review of order denyi y d stayed the proceedings below on March 9, 2018. + +## AS" Representations to this Co t Basis for Partial Lifiinz of Stay + +Shortly thereafter, Ed uested partial relief from this Court's stay, and told this Court why he~eed this: + +> At the tut e stay was entered by this Court, there were mt tle o tending matters to be decided by the trial luding: extensive pretrial motions, obsections to iiion designations for use at trial, and the language form of the jury instructions and verdict form. urthermore, there have been ongoing issues in the trial court regarding the unauthorized possession and use by Petitioner's counsel of extensive attorney-client and workproduct privileged documents.... Epstein's counsel had + +÷ + +The onl brief remaining is Epstein's Reply in the certiorari appeal, pertaining to of interrelated counterclaim from Epstein's original action. + +filed many of those privileged documents in the court file and was seeking leave to use them at trial. + +(Ex. A, Mot. p. 3).2 further pled to this Court that the stay needed partial lifting because them "is a likelihood that further proceedings may be necessary to protect and preserve the privileged materials at issue." (Mot. p. 3). d again, address: led this Court to believe his only intent for partial reliefPS was to + +> other matters pending before the court, inclu trial preparations... + +(Ex. A, Mot. p. 4.) + +# In Reliance, this Court Granted 4es to 1C1) Address Pending Issues + +In response to appell to sel's plea for "fairness" and "efficient use of the trial court's time an " this Court granted the motion in part, and ordered that the "stay of p gs granted by this Court's March 9, 2018 order shall apply only to the !tit' of the underlying matter." (Ex. B, 4DCA Order, March 20, 2018 at 3. .) In other words, this Court has now permitted the parties to address mg pretrial motions, deposition designations, jury instructions, and whether cuments are privileged or not, but expressly and specifically maintained the stay as to matters relating to proceeding with the trial. + +2 Exhibits are located in the Appendix accompanying this Motion. + +Files a Notice of Trial of Severed Claim + +my first filing below at 5:46:22PM on March 20, 2018, less than two hours after this Court's order partially lifting stay, was a "Notice for Trial of Severed Claim against Jeffrey Epstein" (Ex. C) (along with a status conference request) (Ex. D). Less than one hour after this s Order granting partial relief from stay, counsel emailed Ep counsel and informed them that was filing for a status confe tended to set it for hearing in two days despite Epstein's counsel' ailability and Epstein's counsel's offer to set it on the trial judge's very orm motion calendar. (Ex. E.) ' counsel stated the case m nt conference was necessary to address pretrial issues and trial. (E + +Once again, in his haste his counterclaim for trial, failed to properly calculate when an acti could be at issue pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440. Ass that by Epstein's ti for writ of certiorari, the severed claim would still not be at issue un s after the entry of the trial court's order dated March 13, 2018, or April 2. 18. However, the action below was stayed 11 days from March 9, 2018 through March 20, 2018, which means that theoretically the first day a proper notice was proper and had not been challenged + +for trial could be filed is April 13.2018 - if the two pending petitions for writs were not still pending, which, quite clearly, they are. + +## Unilaterally Changes Style of Case + +also moved for a status conference — continuing his hubris by unilaterally changing the circuit case style to his counterclaim, making the "Plaintiff' and Epstein the "Defendant" (and excluding Defend ASP Rothstein from the caption altogether) without any motion, without Ifny approval, and most importantly, in contravention with Florida layer prohibits changing the names of the parties in a caption. (Ex. D.) O~dCsly, none of this should occur while the issue is pending on + +an Furthermore, cannot lange the style of the case or rename the parties after he chose to fi jpo terclaim and be a counter-plaintiff. Pursuant to Trawick's Florida Prach 'Procedure. & 6:2, "the names of the parties in the caption are never ch \pod even when all original parties have ceased to be parties." Ev there is a dispute over the proper identity of a party (not here) and a a motion requesting a name change (not here), changing the case style vit ut an evidentiary hearing is error. See Musicians Exch. Downtown Cafe, Inc. v. Mercede City Ctr., Inc., 613 So. 2d 134,136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). + +## Conflict Between ME Request to this Court and Action Below + +Despite the representations by appellate counsel to this Court that wanted a partial lifting of stay in order to address pretrial motions, jury instructions, verdict form, the privileged documents and other "pending" matters, the very first act by ' trial counsel was to file a new notice for trial of severed claim. In the Notice for Trial, claiys that the counterclaim (now presented as a "claim") is "at issue" and I trial." This is not accurate given this Court's stay order Rule 1.440. 'So be set for to review, and + +It simply is implausible that do eciate that the two pending appeals pertain to when this matter ma IN , es e" and ready to set for trial and whether the trial will proceed as a coinl ed claim and counterclaim. By ignoring the unassailable fact that this Cic) viewing the''' and "at issue" trial orders, asking this "pendin al issues and privilege materials), and then, once obtaining the limited re of requested, immediately filing a notice that has absolutely nothing to do with his request and ignores the specific language of the relief granted (i.e., an is effecti Cly I claring that this Court's review is meaningless. should not b"ow ed to compound his disrespect for the Court's order by specific limited relief (i.e., a partial lifting of the stay for + +improper notice seeking to set a wrongfully severed counterclaim for trial despite the very issue of pending before this Court). + +Epstein's counsel is inclined to ask this Court to "shut the trial court door" and prevent further attempts by to misuse the narrow equitable relief granted by this Court until this Court can review and analyze the jlek pending i petitions. However, that could potentially interfere with this Co ire to allow the parties to perfect the issues to be tried, while the Court eat e two pending and related issues up on appeal. Included among tho es to be perfected at the trial court is errant claim of "privil " ch remains a cloud below < #', preventing the admission of crucial evide e t pstein maintains is dispositive of this case. That evidence must be n camera by the trial court while the appellate issues are under rev sistent with this Court's interest in "fairness" and "efficient use of the to 's time and resources," Epstein will be narrowing his request for in cam/t,\* I view down from 27,000 pages to a readily manageable fraction, 47 ib timbering approximately 100 pages. + +## Conclusion and Requested Relief + +Th Court's orders and words must have meaning. led this Court to believe that he wanted the partial lift of this Court's emergency stay in order to address "pending" pretrial issues, never to "notice for trial" the "severed" counterclaim which is the very issue on appeal. This Court's generous grant of the relief requested by should not be met with a defiant act for which permission was neither requested nor could it have been contemplated by this Court given the pending review of the trial setting and orders. + +Additionally, Epstein also seeks an award of fees from el ding this motion and any additional appellate matters pertaining to ent of this Court's stay orders. See Manzaro v. D'Allessandro, 229 S (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)(court has inherent authority to award appellat eys' fees and costs as a sanction for appellate filings); Ochalek v. Rive o. 3d 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)(courts have inherent authority t,\ attorney's fees for attorney misconduct). + +WHEREFORE, Petitio Ale \*y Epstein, respectfully requests Court grant his motion an "ssu an in violation of this Co Order dated March 20, 2018. order for that this to show cause why he is not + +## ( S, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +4 'I 1 Y CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this furnishe a email this 22nd day of March, 2018: request was + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep®searcylaw.com jsx@searcylaw.com kbtOFLAvrtellateLaw.ccun scarolateam®searcylaw.com Plainti J rds terryteam®searcylaw.com Co-Co41Defendant/Counter-Plaint i J. + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DmkaFLAronellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.co dvitaleesearcylaw.com Co-Cosi lDefe nter- + +J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad®epllc.com Co-Counselor Defendant/Count Plaint i + +Ma s of Marc S. Nurik roward Boulevard, Suite 700 . Lauderdale, FL 33301 arc@nurildaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & eis .A. 250 Australian Ave e S., tute 1400 West Palm Beach, F 401 igoldberszera a.c Co-Cou s 1 fo amtiff/Counter- and Jane Doe Defends ey Epstein + +Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 jay@jayhowell.com smahone m Co-Counsel for Intervenors E.W., L.M. + +VIA . AIL The Hon cable Donald W. Hafele Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (F 903) + +Rachel Jenny Glasser ( 1) + +Primary: ScottalinIcro .com + +Primary: Kara fit cl .com + +Primary: Rachel ,i aw.com + +Secondary: Tina \*drocklaw.com + +Secondary- @linkrocklaw.com + +Seconday, icealinkrocklaw.com + +Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d43c08afa0a2a44359af0ff048f9e3de98573d13 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/EFTA02766253.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1424 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 25, + "chars": 27607, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.35, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_119.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO STRIKE \nTO \nDEFENDANT/CO \nNOTICE FOR T \nCAINTIFF \nOBJECTION \nCASE STYLE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 327.03533935546875 + ], + [ + 506.124, + 327.03533935546875 + ], + [ + 506.124, + 383.3809509277344 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 383.3809509277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ",INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 356.0841979980469, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 356.0841979980469, + 491.60302734375 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 491.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 277.02 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 470.6099999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 665.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 665.7324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.08, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 55.08, + 281.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 118.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 118.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE FOR TRIAL OF EIAVAC)S' SEVERED CLAIM \nAGAINST JEFFRccEPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 493.27200000000005, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 493.27200000000005, + 367.85302734375 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 367.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 159.57000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.3660888671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.3660888671875, + 104.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 104.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PETITIONER'S MOTION FOF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE \nWHY IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER \nDATED MARCH 20, 2018, GRANTING \"IN PART\" \nMOTION FOR P IAL RELIEF FROM STAY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 532.7237548828125, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 532.7237548828125, + 424.6209411621094 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 424.6209411621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 347.0704040527344, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 347.0704040527344, + 585.1209411621094 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 585.1209411621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Areument and Record Basis for Show Cause Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 463.7372741699219, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 463.7372741699219, + 185.51043701171875 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 185.51043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS\" \nRepresentations to this Co t Basis for Partial Lifiinz of Stay", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 376.4487609863281 + ], + [ + 494.5145263671875, + 376.4487609863281 + ], + [ + 494.5145263671875, + 412.01043701171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 412.01043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In Reliance, this Court Granted 4es to 1C1) Address Pending Issues", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 510.4509582519531, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 510.4509582519531, + 378.8809814453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 378.8809814453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Unilaterally Changes Style of Case", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 362.8441162109375, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 362.8441162109375, + 153.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 153.63043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conflict Between ME Request to this Court and Action Below", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 455.5286560058594, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 455.5286560058594, + 668.5104141235352 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 668.5104141235352 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion and Requested Relief", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 408.6625061035156, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 408.6625061035156, + 571.7504119873047 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 571.7504119873047 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "( S, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.05999755859375, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 402.565185546875, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 402.565185546875, + 539.7509307861328 + ], + [ + 153.05999755859375, + 539.7509307861328 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766253" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/_page_7_Picture_119.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/_page_7_Picture_119.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..861ff1cb32db17f6b39a0892d9898348994299e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766253/_page_7_Picture_119.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:021f40ed0f3f8186ace68a2798bf439b8807b38497b268a51b4aa0586e286910 +size 20628 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70a1070ad167b8c7798f5fd288906840030f7151 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.md @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X300CMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND EY EPSTEIN'S UPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI H COURT'S RULINGS' + +Plaintifi7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey pstein') hereby updates his March 8, 2018, Notice of Compliance with the s M h 8, 2018, rulings and states: + +At that hearing, the Co i t e the following rulings: + +- As to Inters' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the pleabtgs rating to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.) to sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.) ÷In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly + +Although no written Order has been entered yet on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record. + +disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2- 63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.) + +- Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.) +- Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi g e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.) + +On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District Co Agica I entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review. That stay uiic :In part, on March 20, 2018, and Epstein hereby updates his Notice of Compliant A + +# PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE + +0 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey EpsteV. ittii , Link & Rockenbach, PA, has complied with the Court's rulings at the Marc \, 1 caring as follows: + +- Link & Rockenbach, has 7tot made any further dissemination of the documents included • pendix in Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to E and Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Sco of Adm. t le dente, the newly disclosed trial exhibits in which claims pri i ege, or other documents from the disc that has asserted p •vilege ms over. +- Neit er Eps n nor his general counsel (Darren Indyke), were ever provided with a co of the disc nor did they review or have access to the disc or the disc's Epstein and his general counsel also never received the disc or alleged leged" documents from the firm or any other former counsel. ÷ec er, Epstein and his general counsel were provided with select e-mails by Link Rockenbach, PA that were included in the Appendix or identified as trial exhibits. Immediately after the hearing on March 8, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its client's general counsel (who was at the hearing), its cocounsel (Jack Goldberger, who was at the hearing), and its litigation team working on this matter to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents obtained from the disc. + - Timothy Chinaris, a former Ethics Director of the Florida Bar who provided an expert affidavit in this action, was also not provided with a copy of the disc but, rather, received a binder (in paper form) containing the unredacted Appendix. + +Mr. Chinaris was instructed to destroy the binder along with any electronic copies he may have had. Mr. Chinaris confirmed his compliance with this request. + +- Neither the disc nor any of its contents were ever provided to the Gunster firm or any of its attorneys nor were the contents of the disc ever discussed with them. + +A Goes + +- • On March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul Cassell, on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated. + +Mr. Cassell's request was addressed, and granted by stipulation, at the March 8, 2018, hearing. Both Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel, however, failed to provide the Court with a proposed order at the hearing, which would have resulted in the immediate sealing of two docket entries that had not yet been opened to the public. While Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel had ample time during the hearing to have an Order prepared and signed by the Court, a proposed order was not circulated to Epstein's counsel until the following afternoon, Friday, March 9, 2018. Judge Hafele had made known to the parties that he would not be in Court on March 9, 2018, because of the Bench Bar Conference, but he advised where he could be found, if needed. Nevertheless, the Fourth DCA's stay was entered on March 9, 2018, within hours of the transmittal of the proposed order. Furthermore, on the evening of March 9, 2018, the Clerk opened the two docket entries that are at issue to the public. + +During the weekend of March 10 and 11, 2018, Epstein's counsel worked tirelessly with [REDACTED] counsel to obtain emergency relief from the duty judge to seal the two docket entries at issue. The duty judge, however, deferred the matter to Judge Hafele. Accordingly, on the morning of March 12, 2018, Epstein's and [REDACTED] counsel went before the Court at 8:30 a.m. and obtained an Order, *nunc pro tunc*, sealing the two docket entries at issue: + +1. 1. Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (D.E. 1242, a 353-page filing with attachments containing actual emails as well as a summary of its contents); and +2. 2. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED] (D.E. 1252). + +The Clerk then sealed the two docket entries which had been open to the public for more than 48 hours. + +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and deleted the electronic filed version from its system. + +- Link & Rockenbach, PA placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes. +- In March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on I= Privilege Log, alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged: + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|----------|-----------------|-------------|----------| +| 1 | 13-1 | 02645 | | +| 2 | 13-4 | 00149 | 35 A | +| 3 | 13-5 | 01527 | 3 | +| 4 | 13-6 | 04493-4495 | | +| 5 | 13-7 | 00014 | 6 | +| 6 | 13-11 | 00090 | | +| 7 | 13-13 | 00133 | 68 | +| 8 | 13-15 | 08006 | 31 | +| 9 | 13-17 | 00026 | 70 | +| 10 | 13-19 | 0100 | 71 | +| 11 | 13-25 | 12 | 33 | +| 12 | 13-30 | 8 | | +| 13 | 13-34 | 64 | 60 | +| 14 | 13-35a | , | | +| 16 | 4,-a03731-03732 | 570 | | +| 17 | 5 c | 06406-06408 | | +| 18 | 1 6 | | | +| | | 01686 | 48 | +| 19 | -47 | 11123-11125 | 50 | +| 20/1 6 | 13-49 | 11126-11127 | 32 | +| 21 | 13-52 | 25925 | | +| (4;;,,32 | 13-53 | 25874 | | +| | 13-56 | 11145 | | +| !) 24 | 13-60 | 03191-03192 | 4 | +| 25 | 13-66 | 04398-04402 | 2,34 | +| 26 | 13-67 | 04408-04412 | 1 | +| 27 | 13-86 | 267477 | 11 | +| 28 | 13-88 | 08042-08044 | 16 | +| 29 | 13-89 | 26741-26742 | 13, 15 | +| 30 | 13-90 | 08059-08061 | 17 | +| 31 | 13-93 | 26756-26758 | 9 | +| 32 | 13-94 | 08036-08038 | 19 | +| 33 | 13-97 | 26762 | 8 | +| 34 | 13-98 | 01117 | 21 | +| 35 | 13-100 | 08121-08123 | 20 | + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|-----|---------|-------------|----------| +| 36 | 13-101 | 26749-26752 | 23 | +| 37 | 13-102 | 08128-08130 | 24 | +| 38 | 13-103 | 08118-08120 | 22 | +| 39 | 13-104 | 08131-08133 | 25 | +| 40 | 13-105 | 08124-08126 | 26 | +| 41 | 13-106 | 08135-08138 | 10 | +| 42 | 13-107 | 27494 | 27 | +| 43 | 13-108 | 26760 | | +| 44 | 13-110 | 25997 | 28 | +| 45 | 13-111 | 25937 | 67 | +| 46 | 13-113 | 26604-26605 | 56 | +| 47 | 13-116 | 07019-07021 | | + +also objected to the following additional e L' ' which were printed from the disc as being late disclosed: + +| No. | Ex. No. | | ltpp. No. | +|------------|---------|-------------|-----------| +| 1 | 13-2 | 03034 4 | 54 | +| 2 | 13-3 | 03 | 55 | +| 3 | 13-8 | 000 | 6 | +| 4 | 13-9 | 22 | | +| 5 | 13-14q | .,2 00 | | +| 6 | 13- | 906-2908 | | +| 7 | | 11237 | | +| | * 1 | | | +| | 1 | 01464 | | +| 9 | 1 - | 01403 | | +| 10 | -21 | 02684-02685 | 51 | +| 111 ,„,,,„ | 13-22 | 01475 | | +| 12 | 13-24 | 03694 | 79 | +| ( 13 | 13-26 | 01166 | 38 | +| ) | 13-27 | 01258 | 72 | +| 15 | 13-28 | 15113-15114 | | +| 16 | 13-31 | 26394 | | +| 17 | 13-33 | 25922 | | +| 18 | 13-37 | 00992 | | +| 19 | 13-40 | 01423 | 7 | +| 20 | 13-41 | 05071 | | +| 21 | 13-43 | 02043 | 81 | +| 22 | 13-48 | 02088 | | +| 23 | 13-50 | 11128-11131 | 49 | +| 24 | 13-51 | 08459 | | +| 25 | 13-54 | 08348-08349 | | +| 26 | 13-55 | 08355 | | + +| No. | Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|--------|---------|-------------|----------| +| 27 | 13-61 | 27284 | 87 | +| 28 | 13-62 | 26893 | 89 | +| 29 | 13-64 | 01255 | | +| 30 | 13-65 | 26836-26837 | 90,91 | +| 31 | 13-68 | 26807 | 92 | +| 32 | 13-69 | 26808-26809 | 93 | +| 33 | 13-70 | 27379 | 94 | +| 34 | 13-71 | 27293 | 95 | +| 35 | 13-72 | 26021 | 63 | +| 36 | 13-73 | 27270 | 96 | +| 37 | 13-74 | 27355 | 97 A | +| 38 | 13-75 | 27325 | 100 | +| 39 | 13-77 | 27322 | | +| 40 | 13-78 | 26777-26781 | | +| | | 4 | 52 | +| 41 | 13-79 | 26782-26786 | | +| | | 26088-26089 | 49 | +| 42 | 13-80 | | | +| 43 | 13-81 | | | +| 4 4 | 13-83 | | | +| 45 | 13-85 | | | +| 46 | 13-92 | | 109 | +| 47 | 13-96 | g o | | +| 48 | 13- | 7051-20752 | 112 | +| 49 | | | 111 | +| | e 9IS | LI17025 | | +| | 1 | 26973 | | +| 51 | GI 4 | 26737 | 57 | +| 52 | -115 | 26485 | 57 | +| SI'S., | 13-117 | 27013 | 58 | + +A + +obj cted to other documents Epstein identified as newly disclosed trial ibi. .ut those were obtained from public sources over which and assell cannot assert privilege claims and, therefore, they are not included as of this Notice of Compliance. + +Link & Rockenbach, PA placed an exhibit sticker on the 100 newly disclosed exhibits identified above to correspond with Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. Two sets of those exhibits were made. One has been retained by Link & Rockenbach, PA in a sealed envelope in a sealed box maintained at its offices for appellate purposes. The other set was initially retained in a sealed envelope at Link & Rockenbach, PA, however, on March 21, 2018, in light of the lifting of the Fourth District Court of Appeal's stay, in part, those exhibits were filed under seal. Epstein has also moved the Court to Make the Court Records Confidential in compliance with the 1511 Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09 + +and set that Motion for hearing on April 9, 2018. + +- • With the exception of the trial exhibits and appendix items identified above which Link & Rockenbach, PA is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that [REDACTED] has identified as privileged. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which it retained at its offices until the stay was lifted. In that regard, on March 21, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA filed the disc under seal and moved the Court to make the court records confidential in compliance with the 15th Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. That Motion is set for hearing on April 9, 2018. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed [REDACTED] original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with [REDACTED] original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the [REDACTED] boxes until further rulings by the Court. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate of the disc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from its computer system and Dropbox, the online service by which those documents were transmitted to counsel of record. +- • Link & Rockenbach, PA began deleting electronic documents from its system and planned to work with IT personnel to remove copies of any documents [REDACTED] has claimed as privileged from its e-mail servers. In light of [REDACTED] objection to the deletion of electronic documents, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA has not taken further steps to delete electronic documents. The Court made no rulings on the preservation of these documents and Link & Rockenbach, PA does not agree that the review [REDACTED] demanded is appropriate. Until the Court rules otherwise, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA will not delete any further electronic documents and will work with its IT personnel to preserve those documents. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 23, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [f + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rocken c 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (F 57 251) Primary: Scot ' kr aw.com Primary: Kara a li ocklaw.com Primary: ache dlinkrocklaw.com Seco idana.linkrocklaw.com S roy®IinlcrocIdaw.com + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Sca la, lbart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beac es Boulevard West Palm B F 3409 dvital rcylaw.com scarolatea scarcylaw.com terrvteamasearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +unsel for Plaintifj7Counter-Defendant Epstein + +## T + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLApnellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseltiendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c598955a6b5397dde84c6a505b59bb4b7dec91f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278/EFTA02766278.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766278.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 19739, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.41, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND EY EPSTEIN'S \nUPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI H COURT'S RULINGS'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 490.52288818359375, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 490.52288818359375, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 449.55000000000007 + ], + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 449.55000000000007 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 336.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 336.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 431.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 431.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766278" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba1d5922c2067b60499f664c072ccb7ae7b21ed7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.md @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800>COCXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant, + +L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +#### RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE OBJECTION TO NOTICE FOR TRIAL AND UNILAT LY CHANGING CASE STYLE + +J. MU by and motion as follows: undersigned counsel, responds to Jeffrey Epstein's + +cos + +'14, - + +Epstein's focus " continuing 4".. to be labeled as "Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant" in a proceeding in which he no ,longer has any claim pending against is irrelevant 7 N. outside the presetkee of the jury. In the jury's presence, it would be confusing to describe him as anythin bu efendant". To avoid jury confusion the caption of the case on all submissions to the jury such as the verdict form) should conform with the reality of Epstein's present status. + +focus is on bringing this nine-year old effort to clear his name to a just conclusion as quickly as the law will allow. To accomplish that objective, regardless of the outcome of Epstein's "hyper-technical" challenge to the May 2017 Notice for Trial that resulted + +of the malicious prosecution claim from Petition for Writ of Certiorari is an original pendency of a certiorari proceeding doe Contrary to Epstein's assertion that "the very issue of ce is pending on appeal", the mere filing of a Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Certio ri othing to disturb this Court's laim against Scott Rothstein, and a not an Appeal. Unlike an Appeal, the prTve the trial court of any jurisdiction, even of the specific subject matter of the c tition itself. See Weaver and Horvath v. Bruguera, 4 DCA Case No. 218, (Order attached), citing Casper & Friends, Inc. v. Nelson, 915 So.2d 646 (FICA 2005). Note also that the 4th DCA stay, now limited only to empaneling a ju s issued only in the mandamus proceeding. The certiorari proceeding was consolidate ith t e mandamus proceeding only for referral to the same panel. Therefore, the stay ore ever applied to the effectiveness of the of the malicious prosecution claim. + +v. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Motion to Strike MI Notice for Trial and Objection to MI Unilaterally Changing Case Style Page 2 of 6 + +in a December 2017 trial setting, re-noticed his at issue claim against Epstein for trial as soon as the stay precluding him from doing so was lifted. The assertion that the filing of that notice violated the Fourth District Court of Appeal's March 20, 2018 Order lifti the stay is untrue as explained in detail in the Response to Petitioner's Motion for Order to o se Why is Not in Violation of This Court's Order dated March 20, 20}B., ting "in Part" Motion for Partial Relief From Stay. The Response is attac ed an corporated herein. + +The granted by this Court after opposing counsel expressly acknowledged the Court's discretion to grant the remains in full effect, is presumed to be correct, and could + +filed is ei each oft Furtherm Ince Epstein argues that the first day of a proper notice for trial could be or April 13, 2018, it is intention to re-notice this case for trial on ys as well. + +v. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Motion to Strike gis Notice for Trial and Objection to Unilaterally Changing Case Style Page 3 of 6 + +not possibly meet the standard of "departing from the essential requirements of the law" necessary to support issuance of the Writ that Epstein has desperately sought. + +Contrary to Epstein's assertion that "matters relating to setting the e counterclaim clearly remain subject to the stay", the Appellate Court clearlyt gt ied in partially lifting the stay as requested, the only issue involved in the PetiH:tion is the timing of when a jury may properly be empaneled. Notice for Trial facilitates a possible earlier trial setting but does nothing to require rit of Mandamus empaneling of a jury. + +This Motion to Strike is absolutely no S1c g < ir \ than a blatant effort to buy another delay. It should be rejected. A new trial date s be t expeditiously and in the highly unlikely event that the previously filed Notice fo ,.....i, "I'lis oUnd defective on the basis of a hyper-technicality, the technical defect will have been ed., + +[REDACTED] v. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response to Motion to Strike [REDACTED] Notice for Trial and Objection to [REDACTED] Unilaterally Changing Case Style +Page 4 of 6 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26th day of March, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@scarcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@scarcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@scarcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@scarcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@scarcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@scarcylaw.com) + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] v. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response to Motion to Strike [REDACTED] Notice for Trial and Objection to [REDACTED] Unilaterally Changing Case Style +Page 5 of 6 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Philip Burlington, Esquire +[pmb@flappellatelaw.com](mailto:pmb@flappellatelaw.com); +[kbt@Flappellatelaw.com](mailto:kbt@Flappellatelaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +[paul.cassell@law.utah.edu](mailto:paul.cassell@law.utah.edu) +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +[REDACTED] v. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response to Motion to Strike [REDACTED] Notice for Trial and Objection to [REDACTED] Unilaterally Changing Case Style +Page 6 of 6 + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire + +kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; + +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 1525 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD., WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +July 15, 2015 + +**CASE NO.: 4D15-2218** + +L.T. No.: CACE 10-21034 13 + +THERESA WEAVER- [REDACTED] and v. HAMLET BRUGUERA +VLADIMIR HORVATH + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Supplement Appendix with Subsequent Trial Court Order and/or Motion to Determine Mootness of Certiorari Proceeding in Light of Entry of Order is granted. This petition is dismissed as moot. The certiorari petition did not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to reconsider the discovery order. See *Casper & Friends, Inc. v. Nelson*, 915 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); further; + +ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees is denied. +TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., Concur. + +Served: + +cc: Sharon C. Degnan Rebecca Nachlas [REDACTED] Parisi +Hon. William W. Haury + +dl + +![]()**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_6_Picture_112.jpeg) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT + +CASE NO. 4D18-0762 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Petitioner, + +-VS- + +EIN, J. and L.M., E.W., an JANE DOE, Intervenors. + +Respondents + +#### RESPONSE T PETITIONER'SaM ON FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THISCOURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 20, 2018, GRANTING "IN PART" MOTION FO.H MRWIAL RELIEF FROM STAY + +ndent, hereby files this Response to Petitioner's Motion for Order to S Cause, etc. + +not violate this Court's Order granting partial relief from stay. Petitio -page Motion for Order to Show Cause is an example of abusive motion ctice with which this Court should not be burdened. + +In his Motion for Partial Relief from Stay, sought such relief to "ensure that this nine-year-old case can be expeditiously tried as soon as the matter under review is resolved." (Motion, p.5)(emphasis added). asked this + +stay' as follows: Consistent with request, this Court granted C partial relief ) from the + +Court to "lift the stay of the lower court proceedings with respect to all matters other than the empaneling of a jury" (Motion, p.5)(emphasis added). explained that based upon the nature of the error alleged by Epstein, "the only trial court action that should be stayed by this Court is the empaneling of a jury and the commencement of trial" (Motion, p.4)(emphasis added). + +. ..The stay of proceedings granted by this Coutarch 9, 2018 order shall apply only to the trial of the underling matter. . . . (Emphasis added). + +has logically interpreted this "c4, o \ 's clear and concise order to be consistent with his request that th lifted as to all matters other than the empaneling of a jury and tram he case, so the parties can be prepared to % expeditiously try Edwards6s case once appellate review is concluded. + +filing of the Notice for Trial after the stay was partially lifted is consistent with his request and this Court's order. Filing a Notice for Trial merely allows to reserve a spot on a future trial docket, which could be many months from now.2 has no intention of attempting to start trial in violation + +had also asked for expedited consideration of the Motion for Partial Relief from Stay, which this Court denied. + +2 For instance, filed his original Notice for Trial on May 24, 2017 and the case was ultimately set to be tried in December 2017. + +of the partial stay (nor would the trial court ever allow that to happen). If the underlying case is reached on the trial docket before this Court has lifted the partial stay, the case will not be tried and instead will simply be pushed back on the docket. + +Epstein raises several other issues which are not properly before this Court. For instance, Epstein claims that the recently filed Notice for Trial does-noticomport with Rule 1.440 and that improperly changed the style of the case below. Neither of those issues are related to any alleged violation thetY order, nor are they within the scope of either petition currently pendinillefore this Court. + +Epstein also gratuitously addresses his \andz his counsel's unauthorized possession; and disclosure of attorney-elient and work-product privileged documents, and claims he is entitl %., d tote the trial court perform an in-camera + +Fowler will not retain any copies of the documents on the discs provided to it, nor shall any ima es or co of said documents be retained in the memor of copiers. Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of [Jaffe law firm', Brad or his client. + +3 Epstein's possession o t material is in direct violation of a 2010 Federal bankruptcy court order issue by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray entered in the proceedings involving the Rothstein Rosenfeldt law firm, which specifically directed Epstein and his predecessor counsel, M, as follows: + +(Ex. B, p.2 to Joinder filed March 13, 2018)(emphasis added). Epstein's improper possession of those documents in violation of Judge Ray's order is the subject of a motion for issuance of an order to show cause filed in the bankruptcy court. + +inspection of those documents. That assertion has no logical connection to the stay and ignores the federal court order requiring the destruction of those documents. + +Epstein's Motion is therefore meritless and should be denied. + +## Epstein's Request for Attorneys' Fees + +Epstein's request for attorneys' fees is as misguided as his motion. He cites Manzaro v. D 'Alessandro, 229 So.3d 843 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2017), where this Court awarded appellate fees for frivolous appellate filings; however, Epstein's motion (which may itself qualify as frivolous) does not of any frivolous appellate filings. + +Epstein's reliance on Ochalek v. R 32 So.3d 1050, 1052 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2017) is similarly inapposite since it oting the inherent authority of a court to assess attorneys' fees for atto onduct, this Court explained: + +This inherent autho known as the "inequitable conduct doctrine," and is reserved for t ose extreme cases where a party acts in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons." (Citations omitted) + +No such atto eci ct is alleged here, nor could it be. Therefore, Epstein's request for es is meritless and should be denied. + +We hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was furnished by mail to The Honorable Donald W. Hafele, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, and to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on March 23, 2018. + ++0 + +/kbt + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq. David J. Vitale, Jr. Esq. SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 jsx@searcylaw.com ket@searcylaw.eom dvita 1 ,t ylaw.com and + +AIM GTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A. c Cowthouse Commons/Suite 350 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 721-0400 Attorneys for Respondent pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com + +By: /s/ Philip M. Burlington PHILIP M. BURLINGTON Florida Bar No. 285862 + +By: /s/ Nichole J. Segal NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v. Rothstein, Case No. 4D18-0762 + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Ste. 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Tina@linkrocklaw.com Troy@linkrocklaw.com Tanya@linIcrocklaw.com Eservice@linkrocklaw.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. AlTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., West Palm Beach, FL 334 jgoldberger@agwpa.com smahoney®agwpa.co Attorney for Jefj ey Ep + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK One E. Broward Boulevardtste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 marc@nuriklaw.co Attorney for Sco + +Esq. EDWA GER LLC 425 N. An ws Avenue, Ste. 2 Ft. Laud e, FL 33301-3268 c.com al~i ttorney for le@patlartice.com J. + +Jay Howell, Esq. JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES 644 Cesery Blvd. Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 jay®jayhowell.com Attorneys for Interveners L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE + +Paul G. C E q. S.J. Q COLLEGE OF LAW AT VERSITY OF UTAH 383 S. ersity St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellp®law.utah.edu Attorneys for Interveners L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d91c374b9b50f2f572c6b1e31bd9eaec0bab9c0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/EFTA02766288.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,666 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 15925, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.98, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_112.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.5093994140625, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE \nOBJECTION TO \nNOTICE FOR TRIAL AND \nUNILAT LY CHANGING CASE STYLE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 514.4998779296875, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 514.4998779296875, + 397.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 397.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 1525 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD., WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.63199999999999, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 550.1880000000001, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 550.1880000000001, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 52.63199999999999, + 81.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.184000000000005, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 50.184000000000005, + 252.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 514.9635620117188, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 514.9635620117188, + 129.24200439453125 + ], + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 129.24200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE T PETITIONER'SaM ON FOR ORDER TO SHOW \nCAUSE WHY IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THISCOURT'S \nORDER DATED MARCH 20, 2018, GRANTING \"IN PART\" \nMOTION FO.H MRWIAL RELIEF FROM STAY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 522.648, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 522.648, + 444.6219787597656 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 444.6219787597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Request for Attorneys' Fees", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 304.6734313964844, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 304.6734313964844, + 196.74200439453125 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 196.74200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 359.9935302734375, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 359.9935302734375, + 101.991455078125 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 101.991455078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766288" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/_page_6_Picture_112.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/_page_6_Picture_112.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac00903c457567c5b3e20a52d952c9eaa6ff7b49 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766288/_page_6_Picture_112.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fd45eb9d66ebb11bac11ee117f039957f3252411cfcf78972878ce37e4e1cfcc +size 18242 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32d6f7ef65b4d697ccb0f80b0c893d9d94b40fee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.md @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +I + +## NOTICE OF HEAFUN + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED thaticvdersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +04 + +DATE: March 29, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion to Change Case Caption + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the mo 'on are self represented. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing nt via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this Zit day of + +: 169440 + +ail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and searcylaw.com + +E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com + +y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +for + +Attorneys0 Fax: 561-3 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com); [brittany@epllc.com](mailto:brittany@epllc.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Philip Burlington, Esquire +[pmb@flappellatelaw.com](mailto:pmb@flappellatelaw.com); [kbt@Flappellatelaw.com](mailto:kbt@Flappellatelaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +[paul.cassell@law.utah.edu](mailto:paul.cassell@law.utah.edu) +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provisjon of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if ou are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algún acomodami participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener ga se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de pone Americans with Disabilitics Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dij s ant para su comparecencia en los tribunales o inmediatamente despu s de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia qu Ak se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de a ik z, Dame al 711." ara poder os, a que ontacto con ela cita fijada + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim Id bezwen akomod o w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou 14, n pwovizyon pou jwen kék kl. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parét nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parét nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblém pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +C /S Y + +? S" ' Pliir + +Rev: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1db8cce8451afd6c7cb80972af816260ef87a2ac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302/EFTA02766302.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766302.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5251, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEAFUN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 359.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 359.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766302" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6b0c4671363a25c4d08840196f40613b49f9770 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.md @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +## Defendant/Counterplaintiff. es) RE-NOTICE OF HEARING + +04 + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t Ntidersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: March 29, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. /S CA)CLe + +JUDGE: Honorabler Hafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixi Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +A0- Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the mo 'on are self represented. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing vi S nt via E-Serve I to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of karaLyze + ++6s + +isp) + +JAC Flon . 169440 A ail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and arcylaw.com E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 39 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 for Attorneys.. Fax: 561-3 J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately opon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn !ajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwolr pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +! 1&? + ++0 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a82956edd0afcf09b8f568cb7c28371275923dfe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307/EFTA02766307.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766307.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4945, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "Defendant/Counterplaintiff. es) \nRE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.88999938964844, + 283.9202880859375 + ], + [ + 421.8950500488281, + 283.9202880859375 + ], + [ + 421.8950500488281, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 153.88999938964844, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766307" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57a53d683638064c301f2142f56900bde98208ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XWMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendam, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., O + +Defendants/Counterplaintiffs, + +## I N TO CHANGE C ON + +M, by and through his un unsel, moves this Honorable Court to change the caption of the severed claim fq ici ds prosecution to reflect status as Plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein' Defendant. Change of the caption is necessary to avoid juror confusion during th cm) • s matter. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY true and correct co • of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attac lipir st, this 27 of 0187 + +rgN?S" •-\_\_\_\_\_-- --- i / day ( + ++'....) JACK CAR Florida Bar o.: 169440 At rne. Mail(s): isx@searcvlaw.com• and ®searcylaw.com ary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Change Case Caption + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com); [brittany@epllc.com](mailto:brittany@epllc.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); +[kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Philip Burlington, Esquire +[pmb@flappellatelaw.com](mailto:pmb@flappellatelaw.com); [kbt@Flappellatelaw.com](mailto:kbt@Flappellatelaw.com) +W.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +[paul.cassell@law.utah.edu](mailto:paul.cassell@law.utah.edu) +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); +[smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +[kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:kara@linkrocklaw.com) +Scott J. Link, Esquire +[Eservice@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Eservice@linkrocklaw.com); +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com); +[Angela@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Angela@linkrocklaw.com); +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com); +[tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:tina@linkrocklaw.com); +[rachel@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:rachel@linkrocklaw.com) +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +[marc@nuriklaw.com](mailto:marc@nuriklaw.com) +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2bc843e46b9e7419ac4509fa798e0dee59987c3d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312/EFTA02766312.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766312.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3500, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "I N TO CHANGE C ON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 418.4349670410156, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 418.4349670410156, + 348.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 348.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766312" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eebd2ec6bb7fd76008f8112a8d156c0e2e3a0c3f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffitotmter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti c lois" pstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before the Ho ble nald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 No Pix•Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Pla effrey Epstein's Motion for Default Against Defendant Ro tens Scott + +DAT • ? Siednesday, April 11, 2018 + +TI 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +### LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the patties who may he represented affected by the are self + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on March 30, 2018, through the Court's e. ofJudicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +O + +LINK, BACH, PA 155 ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 ) S i each, Florida 33401 7 -3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +'Sily• /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +> Trial Counsel for Plaint¶/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeafa4ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvIlida que necesita algun actmodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene tenet\* gastu% propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie HighwarWest Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por !flaws 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." ?S:8 1 + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi Act en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontak4 Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan T i final Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin rescvn a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c41f307bb032e5ed3982587b3602edf21d433ada --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314/EFTA02766314.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766314.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8785, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.36399999999998, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 396.576, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 396.576, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 212.36399999999998, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4140319824219, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4140319824219, + 86.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766314" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2ea34d9864382f75157efa7e567325b90562e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.md @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +[N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800X=MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +04 + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED thatVdersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: April 5, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorabl + +PLACE: 20524. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 29th day of March, 2018. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"1f you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn !ajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou ge wohr pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +fs..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78310d9a4e5393f9790508125779427e28f374d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318/EFTA02766318.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766318.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5155, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 382.0834045410156, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 382.0834045410156, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 148.23 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766318" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..967a01df7b6df1702459b8d96d27273ee04a5fb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.md @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: AkILIS >v + +DATE: April 5, 2018 + +04 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorabl IF nal afele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dim Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion to Change Case Caption + +X Movant's attorney has exchanged multiple communcations with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 29th day of March, 2018. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mjnccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com); [brittany@epllc.com](mailto:brittany@epllc.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Philip Burlington, Esquire +[pmb@flappellatelaw.com](mailto:pmb@flappellatelaw.com); [kbt@Flappellatelaw.com](mailto:kbt@Flappellatelaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +[paul.cassell@law.utah.edu](mailto:paul.cassell@law.utah.edu) +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; ijtyou are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algtin acomodamie ara poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener g fo ios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de poners en ontacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 din's an e la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacien si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia qu se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitaciOn del oido o d z, flame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akom o w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou pey en pwovizyon pou jwen kek Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +CiS \*) + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +tr. N..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b91c89140749f9364f98c78c216bcd2cd811d973 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323/EFTA02766323.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766323.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5404, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 381.7134094238281, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 381.7134094238281, + 355.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 355.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 140.94 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766323" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44e21883a20d27e9907e374bfa839e8010a4570a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.md @@ -0,0 +1,584 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXvIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'WH Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ADDRESS SCHEDULINJ AND PROFESSIONALISM + +, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep Ss v teini moves to address scheduling and professionalism and states: + +### ttcyfr)\*duction + +This Court is commi to adamant about professionalism. Are the Standards and Local Rule No. 4 mandatgFy or cretionary? Recent events (appeal and stay) and the discovery of e-mails that to eviscbtate Counter-Plaintiff J. Ca) claims and shines a ugh n motivation have prompted unprofessional behavior from and his counsel ev Neel by the unilateral setting of hearings, certificates of conferring that never happened d intentional ex parte attendance at a hearing despite knowing of Epstein's counsel's unavailability. The tenor of demands by counsel is more than litigation tactics for which any lawyer — trial or appellate — should develop a thicker skin. Rather, counsel's unilateral setting of hearings, violation of Local Rule No. 4, and failure to acknowledge the Standards of Professionalism and Civility adopted by this Circuit must end and Epstein's counsel is asking this Court to address it. The lack of professionalism serves neither clients nor our profession. + +# TlauJat• and Local Rule + +Despite our ethic-bound duty to zealously represent and advocate for our clien , attorneys practicing in Palm Beach County, as well as in South Florida,' are required to certain standards of professional courtesy. Approved in 2007 by the Board of Di r z) o Palm Beach County Bar Association and endorsed the same year by the judges of e 1 dicial Circuit, the Standards of Professional Courtesy and Civility (Standards) are n "good-faith, civil and respectful communication between counsel..." See Pre ic e. t 2011, the Florida Supreme Court amended the oath of admission to The Fl c 'Sti )o include a promise of "fairness, integrity, and civility" to the court and oppo SSen , 1 written and oral communications." See Oath of Civility.; + +Despite these efforts, the v ent of technology, and more particularly e-mail, required an updating of the I als d Goals. Thus, in May 2014, the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Profession (SCOP) was asked by Bar leadership to review and develop uniform profess' lism guelines, including electronic communications for statewide distribution. rofessionalism Expectations were drafted and approved by SCOP, then approvt.M t re Florida Bar Board of Governors on January 30, 2015. Id. The Standards more + +&#x27; The Standards were adopted by Broward, Indian River, =, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Okeechobee and St. Lucie Counties. + +2 The Standards were originally published in 1990. + +3 http://www.floridasupremecourt.oredecisions/201 1 isc11-1702.pdf, + +4 http://www.palmbeachbar.org/downloads/professionalism expectations 2015.pdf. + +locally adopted should be read together with the statewide applicable Professionalism Expectations! + +More specifically applicable to setting hearings and e-mail communication, the current Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit signed on July 18, 2017, an amendment to Local Rule No. 4 which had been approved in 2015.6 This rule governs Uniform Motion Calendar (UMC) and Specially Set Hearings. This Local Rule "ORDERED" that before an attorn file and serve a Notice of Hearing for a UMC hearing, he or she "shall attempt to ge matter" and c "shall" certify the good-faith attempt to resolver The term "attemp o lye the matter was further explained to mean that it: + +> Ia. require counsel to make reasonab speak to one another (in person or via telephone) ,s, ge in reasonable compromises in a genuine effort to i t o narrow the disputes before seeking Court interven \42• A parties are to act courteously and professionally in e empted resolution of the disputes prior to filing and serving a otice of Hearing including responding timely to counsel Ns ho initiated the attempt to resolve the matter. + +See Local Rule No. 4, paragrap . m, the above occurred, the Local Rule then requires an officer of the court to certify "an II designate with a check mark or other marking the specific certification(s) thatppp + +attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the ey(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought ÷ra e motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues ised. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +5 The Professionalism Expectations replaced the Ideals and Goals of Professionalism that existed since 1990. + +6 The July 18, 2017 amendment to Local Rule 4 was approved by the Florida Supreme Court on June 29, 2017. + +https://www.15thcircuit.com/sites/default/files/administrative-orders/1.004.pdf, paragraph 2. + +- Motion to Lift the Stay of this case, in pail. +- 2. On March 20, 2018, at 4:48 p.m., counsel +- I. On March 20, 2018, at 3:50 p.m., the Fourth District Court of I granted AS O/itale, Jr., of the Searcy Denny law firm, requested undersigned counsel's av ' "li Thursday, March 22, 2018, for a status conference UMC hearing. +- 3. Undersigned counsel promptly res 'Sic March 22, 2018. Counsel thereafter agree-des e , a UMC hearing on Monday, March 26, 2018 (the very next UMC hearing eaten ay). 8(c) 4. On March 20, 201 a • p.m., a counsel filed a Motion for Status Conference and a Notice of H g, dtting the Motion for UMC hearing on March 26, 2018, m agreed. +- 5. iS advised ) that they had a conflict on outs later, on March 21, 2018, at 5:21 a.m., Jack Scarola of the Searcy Denny law feanded to know the basis for undersigned counsel's unavailability on March 22, 20 g, "In the absence of a reasonable explanation for the delay, I intend to appear before Hafele tomorrow to address the rescheduling of pretrial issues and trial." (Exhibit A.) +- 6. Although not required to provide such a detailed explanation, undersigned counsel, in the spirit of professionalism and the conduct expected of both counsel set out in the Standards, advised Mr. Scarola of the conflict (out-of-town travel). + +One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. + +If a party fails to make a good-faith attempt at resolving the issues, this Court has discretion to do certain things, including imposing sanctions. Id., paragraph 5. + +## Record Facts + +7. Mr. Scarola refused to accept undersigned counsel's representations and instead, unilaterally re-noticed the hearing for March 22, 2018, knowing undersigned counsel was not available. + +8. Mr. Scarola appeared ex parte before this Court on March 22, 2018, in violation of Local Rule No. 4, the Professionalism Expectations, and the Standards. + +9. The parties then appeared before this Court on the previously a on date a case style change (that he had sent to the Court ex parte over objection of Epst l). (Exhibit B.) (March 26, 2018) with Mr. Scarola attempting to have the Court issue oCi e This Court ruled that the case style/names would not be ch appellate court rules regarding . is Court rules or the + +10. Thereafter, the second violation of ic u ,4 and unprofessional cmails from Mr. Scarola ensued. + +11. Later that day, at 4:41 on h 26, 2018, counsel noticed two Motions for hearing without wit anyone representing Epstein to clear the dates as required by Local Rule No. 4 t ndards. + +12. Undersignton sel, Kara Rockenbach, e-mailed Jack Scarola at 5:20 p.m.: + +Dear Jac + +The ttached was neither cleared with my office nor am I available for the days away. Further, it does not comply with local Rule No. 4 or our s of Professional Courtesy. + +To be clear, ar one from your office contacted any ons in ny office regarding your below Notice and Re-Notice of Hearing setting Motion for Status Conference and Motion to Change Case Caption - filed today. In one notice of hearing, you indicate "N/A" regarding compliance with Rule No. 4 and in the second notice pertaining to case caption change, you checked the line attesting to having spoken in person or by telephone with the attorneys for all parties who may be affected by relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. Yet, you have not contacted anyone in my office regarding either + +motion. The verification is inaccurate. Had you complied, I would have informed you of my longstanding unavailability and discussed the substance of the motion you filed today (the intent of Rule No. 4). + +Please refrain from unilaterally setting hearings. This is the second time, the first being March 22 when you knew Scott and I were both out of town, but proceeded to court ex parte. + +In compliance with the Standards, we are looking at what our availability is the week of April 2. Please send oronosed UMC dates and we will check our tale\_n4ars. We are not available March 29. 04 + +Sincerely, !Cara + +# (Exhibit C.) + +13. Instead of sending proposed UMC dates as nxNfRsted or the week of April 2 (only days away), Mr. Scarola responded by demanding Sco 1 s d Jack Goldberger's availability for the UMC only three business days away. I \ ti , Mr. Scarola stated that "we" have communicated repeatedly regarding your po on anging the case style and indicated "[t]here "N/A" for the Local Rule No. 4 certification. is nothing to discuss" which is why h + +tent of Local Rule No. 4, the Standards, nor the 14. This simply is C .) Professionalism Expectations. + +15. Epst un el seek this Court to address scheduling and professionalism. Undersigned c5 ormed Mr. Scarola of the same in the most sincere words: + +had enough of your unprofessional behavior. We will be seeking the of the court. Stop with the bullying tactics and unprofessional behavior. Yolyve been a lawyer for a really long time with a really great reputation. Please refrain from such unbecoming behavior. Honestly I've had a lot of respect for you over the years. You are better than you are acting recently. It's just a case. + +# (Exhibit D.) + +16. Before this motion could even be drafted, let alone filed, Mr. Scarola continued the electronic barrage with successive emails: + +a. 8:51 a.m.: "We will be setting a series of UMC hearings on all pending motions...Should you choose not to respond to this request by the close of business today. we will set these hearings unilaterally. + +[no time to respond] + +b. 9:05 a.m.: "I suggest you set your motion to sanction me on Thursday. I will not object to the short notice. This may be "just a case" to you, but for me it is about this: + +[Picture of Oath of Attorney without the updated Oath of Civility A + +### (Exhibits E and F.) + +17. Mr. Scarola also continues to demand hearing avail ack Goldberger, Epstein's criminal counsel who is co-counsel in this case. As S a well knows (and has been reminded), Link & Rockenbach has taken the lead s case and has been drafting court filings and handling the majority of the h earA . .fir carola simply cannot dictate who Epstein chooses to handle hearings in this casX\ + +#### GMOMNT + +Undersigned counsel was ling to professionally forego the five-business-day notice requirements of the Sta d agreed to set the status conference on Monday, March 26, 2018 — two business fter the Thursday, March 22, 2018, date initially proposed by l ' course iwa ' counsel agreed to the March 26, 2018, date as well, and then aboutfaced and d that the hearing be held on March 22, 2018. + ++s no emergency that required counsel to short-set the hearing for March 22, 2018. There is no justification for counsel to appear ex pane before this Court on March 22, 2018, 'mowing undersigned counsel were out of state. There is no excuse for counsel to place this Court in the untenable position of turning away an ex pane appearance as presented by Jack Scarola on March 22, 2018. + +Thereafter, the parties appeared before this Court on March 26, 2018, as originally agreed upon. Because Mr. Scarola did not receive the ruling he sought on changing the case style/name, the unilateral setting for hearing of two motions occurred. This action was compounded by the plainly inaccurate certification by Mr. Scarola that the parties had discussed the case style change issue — we never did! Although Mr. Scarola may have read Epstein's Motion which objected to the case name/style change, the parties never substantively discussed it. Never. + +When this was plainly pointed out, along with the unavailability tlaterally set UMC hearing only three business days away, Mr. Scarola continued a essional behavior and attempted to justify his local rule certifications. + +counsel has acted in violation of the r o s lism Expectations identified above, the Standards of Professional Courtesy ani Rule No. 4, and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure by unilaterally set tinSic , iitig on a date when Epstein's counsel was in (1) failing to "propose" dates as requested for the week of April 2 S ating r' the spirit, if not the rule, of the Standards and the Professionalism Expectatt Ring future motions during the appellate interim require Epstein's counsel to see Court to address scheduling and professionalism. Undersigned not available. Continued behavior by counsel is confid conduct 4wi will not tolerate violations of Local Rule No. 4, and unprofessional uling of hearings. + +#### Conclusion + +The lead lawyers on both sides of the v. have 30-plus years of experience, including highprofile, contentious litigation with important legal issues. And, "Yes," both sets of lawyers are and will continue to be zealous advocates for their clients — however, compliance with the Local Rules and Professional Standards is not a choice. Epstein's counsel requests this Court to address scheduling and professionalism. Epstein requests this Court enter an order settin and times for pending motions, require that counsel comply with Local and that the parties focus on the trial preparation of this matter. Anything less is a104tt dicial resources. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC\$ + +I certify that the foregoing document has been Service List below on March 29, 2018, through the Co of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). o the attorneys listed on the g portal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +CICENBACH, PA Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 alm Beach, Florida 33401 1) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: KaraQIinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tinaglinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# **EXHIBIT A** + +From: Jack Scarola Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 5:21 AM. To: Scott J. Link; Tina L Campbell; Phil Burlington; Paul Cassell; njs@flappellaom; Mary McCann; Kimberly Marsh; Karen E. Terry; Kara Berard Rockenbach Ackerman; jay@jayhowell.com; David P. Vitale Jr.; Chris It Rodgers; brittany@epllc.com; brad@eplIccom ' • Cc: David P. Vitalei lialig Subject Re: Regarding adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) + +Please inform me of the basis for the unavailability of any of Epstein's lawyers to attend either in person or by telephone a simple status conference tomorrow. In the absence of a reasonable explanation for delay, I intend to appear before Hafele tomorrow to address the rescheduling of pretrial issues and trial. Every additional day of delay stands the obvious chance of further prejudicing our en + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 5:03 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. w + +Mary - Please set the Motion for Status Conference for UMC on Mond y e" + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. \ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. ~ West Palm Beach, FL 33409 dvitale@searcvlaw.com Fax: 561-383-9465 C /C)ACCLe Office: 561-686-6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 www.searcvlaw.com \_ + +( S e + +\_\_ \_\_ From: Scott J. Link [mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.coml Sent: March 20;2018 5:00 PM To: David P. Vitale Jr. Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Tina L. CinaPlinkrocklaw.com>; Kimberly Maish ; Mary McCann ; Jack Scarola <15X@SearcvLaw.com>; Chris R. Rodgers . Karen E. Terry Subject: Re: Regarding: , adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) + +I can make that work. Go ahead notice it. Thank you + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +, • . + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information: If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue. Service. + +On Mar 20, 2018, at 4:52 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Sorry, but does that mean that neither you or Kara are available for hearing on Thursday? + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Office: 561-686-6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dvitale@searcylaw.com www.searcylaw.com + +From: Scott J. Link mailto:Scott linkr + +Sent: March 20, 2018 4:50 PM + +To: David P. Vitale Jr. + +Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Tina L. ; Kimberly Marsh ;Mary McCann ; Jack Scarola ; Karen E. Terry Subject: Re: Regarding: Edwards, adv. Epstein (File #: 291874) + +David this Thursday isn't going to work what availability do you have for early next week? Scott + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 Email: scott@linkrocklawicom + + + +# **EXHIBIT B** + +Tina L. + +From: Sent To: Cc: Subject: David P. Vitale Jr. Wednesday, March 21, 2018 2:45 PM Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach; Jack Scarola; Tina L. Karen E. Terry; brad@epllc.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser; Jack Goldberger RE: Epstein v. - Proposed Orders + +You may do what you believe is appropriate, as will we. + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Office: 561-686-6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dvitale@searcylaw.com www.searcvlaw.com + +SEARCY DENNEY Alskti3OP3IlitstheS"WkCiiiIPTOO: + +From: Scott J. Link Imailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.co Sent: March 21, 2018 2:44 PM To: David P. Vitale Jr. Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Jack Scarola ; Tina L ; Karen E. Terry ; brad@epllc.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser ; Jack Gokiberger Subject: Re: Epstein v. Edward - Proposed Orders + +cos + +Then if there's nothing urgbnt time sensitive about these orders we can talk to the judge about them on Monday and get some guidance. Please do not simply submit them to the court. + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: scott linkrocklaw.com + +![](_page_15_Picture_137.jpeg) + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. + +Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 2:42 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. <[dvitale@searcylaw.com](mailto:dvitale@searcylaw.com)> wrote: + +No, your office circulated them this morning and asked whether you had our approval to submit them to the Court. Given that we disagree, we won't be able to submit a single order on each matter and will simply submit two competing orders. That would seem to eliminate the need for a UMC hearing on a motion that hasn't yet been filed. + +--- + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Office: 561-686-6300 +Cell: 561-613-9368 +Fax: 561-383-9465 +[dvitale@searcylaw.com](mailto:dvitale@searcylaw.com) +[www.searcylaw.com](http://www.searcylaw.com) +<[image001.jpg](#)> + +--- + +**From:** Scott J. Link [] +**Sent:** March 21, 2018 2:38 PM +**To:** David P. Vitale Jr. <[dvitale@searcylaw.com](mailto:dvitale@searcylaw.com)> +**Cc:** Kara Berard Rockenbach <[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com)>; Jack Scarola <[JSX@SearcyLaw.com](mailto:JSX@SearcyLaw.com)>; Tina L. [REDACTED] <[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com)>; Karen E. Terry <[KET@SearcyLaw.com](mailto:KET@SearcyLaw.com)>; [brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com); Rachel Jenny [REDACTED] <[rachel@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:rachel@linkrocklaw.com)>; Jack Goldberger <[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com)> +**Subject:** Re: Epstein v. [REDACTED] - Proposed Orders + +David is there something urgent about these orders that will not wait until UMC on Monday? Scott + +**Scott J. Link** +Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +office (561) 727-3600 | fax (561) 727-3601 | +Email: [scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:scott@linkrocklaw.com) + + + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 2:37 PM, David P. Vitale Jr. wrote: + +Having received no clarification we will submit both sets of orders and will note your general objection to our orders as well as your specific objection to the case stsV sed in our submissions. + +Thanks, David + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, 4 49 + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +SI IS \ + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Office: 561-686-6300 + +Cell: 561-613-9368 + +Fax: 561-383-9465 + +dvitale@searcvlaw.com + +www.searcvlaw.com + + + +From: David P. Vitale Jr: + +Sent: March 21, 2018 12:09 PM + +To: Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Cc:Jack Scarola ; Tina L. ; + +Karen E. Terry ; bradPeollc.com; Scott J. Link + +; Rachel Jenny Glasser ; Jack + +04:Adberger< oldber er a w a.com> + +Subject: Re: Epstein v. - Proposed Orders + +CO + +Your objection Is to the case style reflecting the severed claim, to the substantive edits to the Jansen order, or both? + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Kara Berard Rockenbach wrote: + +David, + +I disagree and obiect again to you submitting orders that - without a hearing - unilaterally change the style of the case. + +I will notice both sets of orders for Monday's UMC. + +Sincerely, + +Kara + +Kara Berard Rockenbach S ANC + +UNK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-36001 cell (561)662-40311 fax (561) 727-3601 I Ema . karaelinkrocklawcorn + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us Immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +0er We ill submit our respective orders and the judge can decide which most accurately reflects his ruling, as he has done In the past. here Is no need for a UMC hearing. + +From: David P. Vitale Jr. imailto:dvitale@searcvlaw.com] Sent Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:54 AM To: Kara Berard Rockenbaeh Cc: Jack Scarola ; Tina L. ; brad@eplIc.com; Scott J. Link ; Rachel Jenny Glasser ; Jack Goldberger Subjecce: Epstein v. - Proposed Orders + +Thanks, David + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +\*Sent from my (Phone. Please excuse any typos or errors. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Kara Berard Rockenbach wrote: + +David, + +We do not agree to your submitting your edited, stylechanged orders. Please set for an 845 on Monday, March 26, 2018. + +Thank you, Kara + +Kara Berard Rockenbach + +UNK & ROCKENBACH, PA + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +office (561) 727-36001cell (561)662-40311 fax (561) 727-360C1s) + +Email: karaellnkrocklaw.corn + +41.c) + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential infoi:Mation. If it is not meant for you, please delete It and notIfy.us Immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed of unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our oammunkattoas may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be irnposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +From: David P. Vitale + +[mailto:dvitalecasea rcvlaw.comj + +Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:48 AM + +To: Kara Berard Rockenbach + +Cc: Jack Scarola ; Tina L. + +Campbell ; Karen E. Terry + +; brad@eplIc.com• Scott J. Link + +; Rachel Jenny Glasser + +achel@linkrocklaw.com>; Jack Goldberger + +cigoldberger@ampa.com> + +Subject: Re: Epstein v. - Proposed Orders + +Hi Kara, + +Understood. We will submit the competing orders In a submission to the Judge. + +Thanks, + +David + +\*Sent from my (Phone. Please excuse any typos or errors. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Kara Berard Rockenbach wrote: + +David, + +Thank you for sending these. We cannot agree to change the caption and we object to your edits. + +Sincerely, Kara + +Kara Berard Rockenbach + +LINK & ROCKENBACH. PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I cell (561)662-40 (561) 727-36011 Email: k- inkr + +This e-mail IF center Ileged or confidential i ormation. it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be-delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relledupon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +From: David P. Vitale Jr. fmailto:dvitale@searcvlaw.coml Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:02 AM To: Jack Scarola ; Tina I-Cina@linkrocklaw.com> Cc: Karen E. Terry ; brad@eplIc.com; Scott J. Link Ccott@linkrocklaw.com>; Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Rachel Jenny Glasser ; Jack Goldberger cigoldbereeraaewpa.com> Subject: RE: Epstein v. Proposed Orders + +Our proposed edits are attached. + +Thanks, David + +David P. Vitale Jr., Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Office: 561-686-6300 Cell: 561-613-9368 Fax: 561-383-9465 dvitale@searcvlaw.com www.searcvlaw.com + +From: Jack Scarola Sent: March 21, 2018 9:46 Alvtr To: Tina L ; brad@eollc.corn; Scott J. Link. ; Kara Berard Rockenbach ; Rachel Jenny Glasser ; Jack Goldberger< oldber er a w a.com> Subject: Re: Epstein v. Proposed Orders + +All three orders are acceptable as drafted. + +On Mar 21, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Tina L. wrote: + +Jack, David and Karen, + +I am attaching the following proposed Orders: + +- 1. Agreed Order Deferring Ruling on Epstein's MIL as to Sex Offender Registry Information — + +- Jack had approved this before the stay; +- 2. Order Denying in Part and Reserving in Part on Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements – we have incorporated David's changes from March 6th and cleaned up some formatting issues; and +- 3. Order Denying Epstein's Motion to Strike Dr. Jansen. + +Please let us know if we have your approval to submit these Orders to the Court. + +Thank you. + +**Tina Campbell, +CP/FRP** +Certified Paralegal + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +office (561) 727-3600 | fax (561) 727-3601 | +Email: [tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:tina@linkrocklaw.com) + +--- + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + + + + + + + +\*\*\*\*\* +\*\*\*\*\* +\*\*\*\*\* + +| Privileged and Confidential | +Electronic communication is not a +secure mode of communication and + +# EXHIBIT C + +Tina L. IMO + +From: Kara Berard Rockenbach Sent Monday, March 26, 2018 5:21 PM To: Jack Scarola Cc: Karen E. Terry; David P. Vitale Jr.; Scott J. Link; Tina L • Jack Goldberger; smahoney@agwpa.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser; Mary McCann Subject: FW: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT CASE NUMBER 502009CA040800XXXXMB EPSTEIN, JEFFREY - ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT Attachments: Response To Motion.pdf; Notice Of Hearing.pdf; Re-Notice Of Hearing.pdt Motion.pdf + +Dear Jack, + +The below/attached was neither cleared with my office nor am I available for the UMC old), 3 days away. Further, it does not comply with local Rule No. 4 or our Standards of Professional Courtesy. + +To be clear, no one one from our office contacted any one in my office regarding your below Notice and Re-Notice of Hearing setting Motion for Status Conference and Motion to Change Case Caption - filed today. In one notice of hearing, you indicate "N/A" regarding compliance with Rule No.4 and in the second notice pertaining to case caption change, you checked the line attesting to having spoken in person or by telephone with the attorneys for all parties who may be affected by relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. Yet, you have not contacted anyone in my office regarding either motion. The verification is inaccurate. Had you complied, .I would have infonned you of my longstanding unavailability and discussed the substance of the motion youfiled today (the intent of Rule No.4). + +Please refrain from unilaterally setting hearings. This is the second time, the first being March 22 when you knew Scott and I were both out of town, but proctedatto court ex parte. + +In compliance with the Standards, we are looking at what our availability is the week of April 2. Please send proposed UMC dates and we will check our calendars. We are not available March 29. + +Sincerely, Kara + +![](_page_23_Picture_8.jpeg) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.. Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-36001 cell (561)662-4031) fax (561) 727-3601 I Email: karaalinkrocklaw.com + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +From: eservIce@myflcourtaccess.com lmailto:eservice@myflcourtaccess.coml + +Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 4:41 PM + +Subject: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT CASE NUMBER 502009CA040800XXXXMB EPSTEIN, JEFFREY - ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT + +# EXHIBIT D + +Tina L. + +From: Scott J. Link Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 8:34 PM To: Jack Scarola Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach; Karen E. Terry; David P. Vitale Jr.; Tina L. a Jack Goldberger; smahoney@agwpa.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser; Mary McCann Subject: Re: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT CASE NUMBER 502009CA040800XXXXMB EPSTEIN, JEFFREY - ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT + +Jack we've had enough of your unprofessional behavior. We will be seeking the assistance of the court. Stop with the bullying tactics and unprofessional behavior. You've been a lawyer for a really long time with a really great reputation. Please refrain from such unbecoming behavior. Honestly I've had a lo'f respect for you over the years. You are better than you are acting recently. It's just a case. + +Scott 0 + +Scott J. Link Board Certified Business Litigation + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) M-M0t Email: scott(alinkrocklaw.corn + +![](_page_25_Picture_6.jpeg) + +CIVIL TRIAL APPELLATE LAW c h ) his e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +On Mar 26, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Jack Scarola CSX(aSearcyLaw.com> wrote: + +You have addressed your unavailability. You have not addressed Scott's unavailability or Jack Goldberger's. Are any of the three of you available on Wednesday? We have communicated repeatedly regarding your position on changing the case style. Have you changed your mind. There is nothing to discuss regarding the need for a status conference, which is why I indicated that communication was not applicable. + +On Mar 26, 2018, at 5:20 PM, Kara Berard Rockenbach wrote: + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +Tina L. + +From: Jack Scarola + +Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 8:51 AM + +To: Scott J. Link + +Cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach; Karen E Terry; David P. Vitale Jr.; Tina L Jack + +Goldberger; smahoney@agwpa.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser; Mary McCann + +Subject: Re: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT CASE NUMBER 502009CA040800XXXXMB EPSTEIN, JEFFREY - ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT + +We will be setting a series of UMC hearings on all pending motions, jury instructions, verdict form, and deposition designation objections. Please provide the dates of availability of Epstein's lawyers over the course of the next three weeks. All pending motions will be noticed for hearing in the order in which they were filed. Should you choose not to respond to this request by the close of business today, we will set these hearings unilaterally. + +• + +![](_page_27_Picture_14.jpeg) + +# **EXHIBIT F** + +Tina L. [REDACTED] + +From: + +Jack Scarola + +Sent: + +Tuesday, March 27, 2018 9:05 AM + +To: + +Scott J. Link + +Cc: + +Kara Berard Rockenbach; Karen E. Terry; David P. Vitale Jr.; Tina L. [REDACTED] Jack Goldberger; smahoney@agwpa.com; Rachel Jenny Glasser; Mary McCann +Re: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT CASE NUMBER 502009CA040800XXXXMB EPSTEIN, JEFFREY - ROTHSTEIN, SCOTT + +Subject: + +I suggest you set your motion to sanction me on Thursday. I will not object to the short notice. This [REDACTED] be "just a case" to you, but for me it is about this: + +![](_page_29_Picture_28.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6215b2c24f615503c1bc3e35ecef764e7e4f8e69 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/EFTA02766328.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1370 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 30, + "chars": 43181, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.14, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_15_Picture_137.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_25_Picture_6.jpeg", + "_page_27_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_29_Picture_28.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'WH Y EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO ADDRESS SCHEDULINJ AND PROFESSIONALISM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 487.47406005859375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 487.47406005859375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ttcyfr)*duction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.38999938964844, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 339.048, + 437.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 212.38999938964844, + 437.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TlauJat\u2022 and Local Rule", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Record Facts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.668, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 343.0845642089844, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 343.0845642089844, + 196.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 268.668, + 196.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibit C.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 136.31375122070312, + 277.02 + ], + [ + 136.31375122070312, + 293.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 293.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibit D.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 136.10757446289062, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 136.10757446289062, + 652.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 652.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Exhibits E and F.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 172.97645568847656, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 172.97645568847656, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GMOMNT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 403.4049987792969 + ], + [ + 344.5725402832031, + 403.4049987792969 + ], + [ + 344.5725402832031, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 337.4122619628906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 337.4122619628906, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC$", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 389.4507141113281, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 389.4507141113281, + 307.4830017089844 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 307.4830017089844 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 370.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 366.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 459.0, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 366.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 456.552, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 456.552, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 366.93 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766328" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_15_Picture_137.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_15_Picture_137.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a289c3952cd1e8c4858e679b3426345a9c6ab9e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_15_Picture_137.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a7f34ac9a34b34e16a31cefefb62215f576397a8eb42b385bbf7a1b18d021c72 +size 4743 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_23_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_23_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46c4cd76b0fc6d986c577806b0e1ed003ae1fb64 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_23_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1000e8d8a894862b95ff159469070bd2ed50a566053d368a731cbc88b50dba23 +size 11788 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_25_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_25_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4149d92fb411a7d1d4070b741b84e1253604e6e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_25_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f7a5b9234a5eaa4ba8061be15145b9602bb14083c3175ae95e92c73500dff5a2 +size 11346 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_27_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_27_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29915aa5f5d87ef701cf631dd2f999f39bd095f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_27_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac051734108df24bc991cfda21e5cc36ce78c018f0b6b2b16d8cc443b3a18dfe +size 6999 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_29_Picture_28.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_29_Picture_28.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4b02a006949414f470f865bf3351ae03074cf6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766328/_page_29_Picture_28.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:546b9d6f10ed1a3308bc71e5914b97afc282ef528460c826573899ec2c58c928 +size 250259 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17e5dc8cb462a207e5cb9259bf0086aa6565d436 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +2010 OCT 12 AM 5:45 +STATE OF FLORIDA CIRCUIT COURT +CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +**AGREED ORDER** + +**THIS MATTER** having come before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to File the Joint Statement in the above-styled case pursuant to the Court's Order dated September 2, 2010. The parties having agreed to the entry of this Agreed Order and the Court having otherwise been fully advised, it is + +**ORDERED and ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Joint Statement is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff shall file the Joint Statement pursuant to this Court's previous September 2, 2010 Order and shall have through and including October 8, 2010 within which to do so. + +[END OF ORDER - DONE & ORDERED ON NEXT PAGE] + +DONE and ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm unty, Florida, on this + +of October, 2010. + +oaf + +Judge David F. + +Gary = Jr., Est L. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos, et al Lilly A Esq. 425 N. Andrews Ave., #2 Fow umett , P.A. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 9 oint West + +an, Esq. Flagler Drive + +Mr. Jack Goldberger st Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Mr. Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Blvd. 174lor Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL + +Jack Scarola, Searcy, De el la, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm each Lakes Blvd. West Palm each, FL 33409 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..989f432349da84da1f5ae1cc15f33775873ced5b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358/EFTA02766358.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766358.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1721, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 347.964, + 50.21999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.688, + 50.21999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.688, + 92.07000000000001 + ], + [ + 347.964, + 92.07000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 347.964, + 101.277 + ], + [ + 550.194, + 101.277 + ], + [ + 550.194, + 113.83200000000001 + ], + [ + 347.964, + 113.83200000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 364.09499999999997 + ], + [ + 374.928, + 364.09499999999997 + ], + [ + 374.928, + 377.487 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 377.487 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766358" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cafb5e52e50cb8408fa3a39b63c5d9389472124 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXX1MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEF EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION TO CHANGE ASE CAPTION + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E pstein"), responds to the Motion to Change Case Caption filed by Counter-PI ey J. (`a), and states: + +## MENT + +la March 26, 2 18, to Change Case Caption asks this Court to violate deni In addition, because the issue is currently pending District Court of Appeal makes a final determination on that issue, Florida law and should on appeal, and un evaluating " .ce Because Id (as a. claims in his Motion) and setting the trial is premature. is matter has been stayed, including issues relating to (as confirmed by the Fourth District Court of Appeal on March 29, 2018), no juror confusion will result while the Fourth District Court of Appeal makes a final determination on the issue. + +Pursuant to Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure. § 6:2, "the names of the parties in the caption are never changed even when all original parties have ceased to be panics." In fact, even where there is a dispute over the proper identity of a party and a party files a motion requesting a name change, changing the case style is error without an evidentiary hearing. See Musicians Exch. Downtown Cafe, Inc. v. Mercede City Ctr., Inc., 613 So. 2d 134, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). + +chose to file a counterclaim and be a counter-plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Epstein. Epstein dismissed his claims against (without prejudice) on August 16, 2012. Since that time, has noticed this matter for trial (excluding the most recent) four tim the Court has set the matter on the trial docket seven times. Not once (before his our request), however, did seek to sever his claims or move the Court to gKang case style. + +![](_page_1_Diagram_2.jpeg) + +While the Court granted M.' eleventh-hour request to sever the claims, that ruling is the subject of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Until such time as the Fourth District Court of Appeal makes a determination on that Petition, Mi Motion is both premature and in violation + +of Florida law. lithe Fourth District Court of Appeal upholds this Court's ruling, then the parties can discuss ways to address any "prejudice" or jury confusion that is concerned about. + +# CONCLUSION + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court deny EM Motion to Change Case Caption. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the • listed on the Service List below on March 29, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal t Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROC 1555 Palm Bea Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm da 33401 (561) 727 SDK ) 727-3601 [fax] + +ink (FBN 602991) rand Rockenbach (FBN 44903) chel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdf915b97247060db0ac8565a8191cc392622be8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/EFTA02766360.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10157, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.76, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Diagram_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEF EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION TO CHANGE ASE CAPTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 481.644, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 344.2449645996094, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 344.2449645996094, + 437.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 437.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 98.82 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Diagram", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766360" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/_page_1_Diagram_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/_page_1_Diagram_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4e4709af6a316293d8e4fde679f8aa1a2b2999b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766360/_page_1_Diagram_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:341368238d6c54b0d2894d04c98ed4f1ea42dbce56ebecb2db8e1d48edf0cfbc +size 80720 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..206db9f219bb4d4ec4f5a886712c9242a59b2895 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.md @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). C + +## NOTICE OF FILING 'S BSTITUTE PROPOSED ADVERSE INFERENCE JURY INSTRUCTION + +J. ME, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby provides Notice of the Filing of a Substitute Proposed Adverse Inference Jury Instruction, which includes the changes discussed on the record at the March 8, 2014 hearing, as attached. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve I nit to all Counsel on the attached lis this PP" dalof 2018. + +/ + ++6\ + +JACIC,SCAROLA Florida Bei. No.: 169440 AttomelE-Mail: isx@searcylaw.com; and rrunc'ann@searcylaw.com Pfimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-38.1 Attorneys for J. + +MB adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Notice of Filing Substitute Adverse Inference Jury Instruction + +## ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION — FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that appli r a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit. + +Therefore, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein refused to answer questions/AA/hell nted with relevant evidence against him on the ground that his answers may tend to inc minate him, then you may, but are not required to, infer that his answers would have 'Incriminated him. You may consider this, together with the other evidence, in determining th of this case, but a Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein cannot rest solely on the adv Terence. + +Authority: Fla. St. Jury Ins. 301.11a; axter v. 425 U.S. 308 (1976); Q2O1O IMvestments v. Rothstein, No. 10-60786-cv-2012 44 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) + +,SP + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Substitute Adverse Inference Jury Instruction + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Filing Substitute Proposed Adverse Inference Jury Instruction + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; + +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffa5df9e3d2f3089fcc5323f7676aa1d6ff76177 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364/EFTA02766364.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766364.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3998, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING 'S BSTITUTE \nPROPOSED ADVERSE INFERENCE JURY INSTRUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 464.1951599121094, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 464.1951599121094, + 349.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 349.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION \u2014 FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.70000457763672, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 145.97247314453125 + ], + [ + 127.70000457763672, + 145.97247314453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 158.76 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 158.76 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766364" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7aafbf503370f2f422f34289e3cd6fd7933264df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff + +vs. + +4 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, + +Intervenors. + +oc + +## ORDER ON PAUL G. CASSELL'S MOTION TO ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE + +This Cause came before the Court on Paul C. Cassell's Emergency Verified Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed March 7, 2018. + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. + +wej DO E AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this )--day ../ oft , 2018. + +o) THE H ORABLE DONALD W. HAFELE CIRC IT COURT JUDGE + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Atttomey E-Mails: jsx®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Aik Fax: (561) 383-9451 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 C Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com oS Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +J. , Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 \ Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +iS 4/) 9 + +Attorney for Plaintiff J. Eels S ale' + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 . Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jay Howell + +Jay Howell & Associates + +Florida Bar No.: 225657 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com + +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 + +Jacksonville, FL 32211 + +(904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL + +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the 4414ak AS A)9 + +University of Utah + +Utah Bar No.: 6078 + +383 S. University St. + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 + +(801) 585-5202 + +Pro Hac Vice + +Attorneys for Intervenors L.M., E. 1V, and Jane Doe \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab0ff372c9da3b01206f29530a05b8370b90728e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368/EFTA02766368.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766368.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2160, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON PAUL G. CASSELL'S MOTION TO ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 511.5265197753906, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 511.5265197753906, + 365.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 365.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 84.363037109375 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 84.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766368" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b43580a2aa5f7f8f60d9207e6e706285dd6be5e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.md @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +J. + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +## ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO INTERVENE TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY OF THEIR PRIVILEGED AND OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIALS AND TO SEEK OTHER APPROPRIATE REMEDIES + +This cause came before the Court for hearing on March 8, 2018, upon unopposed emergency motion by sexual assault victims L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the three victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, to intervene to protect the confidentiality of their asserted privileged and otherwise protected materials and to seek other remedies. + +Good cause having been established in the motion that the three victims have interests in their privileges, protections, and confidentiality interests in various materials at issue in this case, and in light of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230 allowing "[a]nyone claiming an interest in pending litigation may at any time be permitted to assert a right by intervention," and no opposition having been advanced by either party in this case, the three victims are allowed in intervene in this case. The three victims are allowed intervention to assert protections regarding confidentiality of materials they arc argue arc privileged or are otherwise protected and to seek appropriate remedies + +concerning these materials, the possible inappropriate release of these materials, and protections relating to these materials. + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 2 day +*daily* +of March, 2018. + +![]() + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Atttomey E-Mails: jsx®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 C West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com O S Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com "S C) J. M, Esquire 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Attorney for PlaintiaJ. Ed r + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 11,114," 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561>659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Defendant Jeffi-ey Epstein + +Jay Howell + +Jay Howell & Associates + +Florida Bar No.: 225657 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com + +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 + +Jacksonville, FL 32211 + +(904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL + +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the + +University of Utah + +Utah Bar No.: 6078 + +Salt Lake City, UT 841 I2 C 383 S. University St. O 'S iS 4)9 + +(801) 585-5202 + +Pro Hac Vice + +Attorneys for Intervenors L.M., E. W.., and Jane Doe \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a65bae040c064371720d73a9ef3a0e20fc33f1cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371/EFTA02766371.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766371.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3229, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.51, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION BY L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE TO \nINTERVENE TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY OF THEIR PRIVILEGED AND \nOTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIALS AND TO SEEK OTHER APPROPRIATE \nREMEDIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 525.36474609375, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 525.36474609375, + 351.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 351.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 82.863037109375 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 82.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766371" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0d90926bc6fbdbfbead842f2e83c8225abad368 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +March 29, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. TT W. ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) Appellee / Respondent(sO + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +(a) ORDE t pe March 22, 2018 motion for anilbrder to show cause against respondent J. is denied; further, ORDERED that the Court sua sponte modifies its stay order entered on March 20, 2018, to prohibit the circuit court from conducting a trial in the proceeding below until the pending petition for mandamus in 4D18- 762 and the petition for certiorari in 4D18-787 are resolved. In addition, for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of this order, the circuit court shall not enter any order setting a future trial date. The stay does not prohibit other eps taken by the circuit court or the parties in preparing the case below for trial. + +Served: + +cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach C John Scarola Philip M. Burlington Rachel Jenny GI Scott J. Link Nichole J. Segal Hon. Donald W. Ha + +San Gofer + +J. Clerk Palm Beach + +dl + +n 81 LiCOIN WEIS\$BLUM, Clerk FOilifitaiitligtoont of Appeal + +![](_page_0_Picture_16.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc565e911c0b09ff7ade67bcc8c62023fe97e59b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/EFTA02766375.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1260, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_16.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 536.5657348632812, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 536.5657348632812, + 102.31201171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 102.31201171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.26, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 221.83914184570312, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 221.83914184570312, + 289.44207763671875 + ], + [ + 64.26, + 289.44207763671875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766375" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/_page_0_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/_page_0_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2766f96f618ee60580eabaf90c6f941833da55b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766375/_page_0_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a9c756b084e1cbebe9311604a4f6575d339128f5a6459563ff6d19e2c7690a54 +size 20036 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a2014f86e09a4ee4fb4b9d0ecaac82222a44b2f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.md @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant. + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELL + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED tt t th rsigned has CANCELLED the following + +hearing: + +DATE: April 5, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Hafele + +PLACE: 2 Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +SPEC 1TERS TO BE HEARD: Motion to Change Case Caption + +C.) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 4/2 day of APRIL, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +[brad@epllc.com](mailto:brad@epllc.com); [brittany@epllc.com](mailto:brittany@epllc.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Philip Burlington, Esquire +[pmb@flappellatelaw.com](mailto:pmb@flappellatelaw.com); [kbt@Flappellatelaw.com](mailto:kbt@Flappellatelaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +[paul.cassell@law.utah.edu](mailto:paul.cassell@law.utah.edu) +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) + +[REDACTED] § adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire + +kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Scott J. Link, Esquire + +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; + +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4510d6a68a891cfdde8944fde4860ec8240a2ec3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376/EFTA02766376.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766376.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3435, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.928, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 366.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 366.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766376" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b698d987142d7f82556acb87d009f5dd543dc672 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.md @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +cos + +## ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLE MOTION FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION + +This cause came before the Court fo t ing~ on March 8, 2018, upon Counter-Plaintiff IM ('a') Moll Adverse Inference Instruction, and the Court, having considered the motion and the ments of counsel, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES that the Motion is GRANTED for reasons stated on the record and summarized as follows: + +- 1. An adverse infere e Jury instruction is appropriate concerning Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") assertion of the Fifth Amendment to relevant questions. and discovery. 3/8/18 Aft. Tr. at 102:5-11; 102:20-103:4; 105:9-11; 108:7-9. Epstein's objection to the Court giving an adverse inference jury instruction is overruled. 3/8118 Aft. Tr. 105:16-20. +- 2. has submitted his proposed adverse inference jury instruction. shall modify the second sentence of the first paragraph of his proposed instruction. In order + +Order on Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Motion for Adverse Inference Instruction +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]* +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXXMB-AG + +--- + +for Epstein to preserve his objection, Epstein may submit an alternate proposed adverse inference jury instruction within twenty days of the date of this Order. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4 day + +*April* +of March, 2018. + +THE HONORABLE DONALD W. HAFELE +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +Rachel J. Glasser, Esquire +Link & Rockenbach, PA +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Troy@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-659-8300 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +'Order on Counter-Plaintiff n. Motion for Adverse Inference Instruction Jeffrey Epstein it Scott Rothstein and I. Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMR-AG + +Philip M. Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esquire pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W. Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +J. Esquire brad@eplIc.com staff. efile@pathtojustice.com 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire Jay Howell & Associates jay@jayhowell.com Jacksonville, FL 32211 644 Cesery Boulevard, #250 Attorney for Intervenors + +Paul G. Cassell, Esgt re cassellp®law.utah.e Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorney for Intervenors + +Marc S. Nurik marc@nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorney for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +\*Order on Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Motion for Adverse Inference Instruction +*Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]* +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMB-AG + +--- + +Jack Scarola +Karen E. Terry +David P. Vitale, Jr. +mep@searcylaw.com +jsx@searcylaw.com +dvitale@searcylaw.com +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +terryteam@searcylaw.com +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..000a86c1ecf0c56250674041dd174bd6aba95ff0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380/EFTA02766380.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766380.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3991, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLE MOTION FOR \nADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 511.4173583984375, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 511.4173583984375, + 378.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 91.18799999999999, + 378.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 344.25 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 344.25 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766380" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0eeb760675fd2b3c124c1185ee0ad9d9dbf1925 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifdCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTH\_,\_ STEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION O ,I h)l ARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Co Plaintiff/Co 'SI dant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), hereby cancels the following hearing set befo ic h o rable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse,) No Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Plainti Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records dential + +DATE: MOSPI ja ,April 9, 2018 + +TIME 5 am. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on April 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scotial. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Sco It Primary: Primary: Rac4akali klaw.com Secondary: Apaelinkrocklaw.com Seconda linkrocklaw.com + +Tr for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant tern + +## E LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach lakes u evard West Palm Bea L 33 09 m law com terryteam'Qsearcylaw.com Co-Counselifendani/Counier-Ploiniiff J. + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppel lateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseioaendant/Counier-Plainiuf J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62a5641a6a2c1a701b289f33d2eeee2a25aea20c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384/EFTA02766384.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766384.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4505, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION O ,I h)l ARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 448.8730773925781, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 448.8730773925781, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 73.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 73.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 431.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 431.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766384" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..628f394587bba93747566ba9b64009243ebf9fe9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.md @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800,OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTH TEIN ividually, ME J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +# MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLA ON OF COURT ORDER + +J (' "), by and dersigned counsel, hereby files this + +Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court ?cc 'S%,, , as grounds therefor states as follows: + +#### 'Sum an, + +At the March 8, 2018 hearin 's Court entered a blanket confidentiality order prohibiting Epstein from using or referring' any way, the documents contained on the.. CD: + +As a general blam,,,,opier I would simply say that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr. stein shall be subject to this order of confidentiality, of sealing and of non-dissemination of any such information that is contemplated in any of the documents that are part of the umbrella order of Judge Ray. And that would include all of the exhibits that we spoke about today and that have been filed as a matter of record. + +3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 79:9-18 (emphasis added)) In so ruling, the Court made clear that "when this Court makes a statement, it is abundantly clear that it will be enforced to the letter." + +See id. at 78:7-19. + +While the parties have submitted competing written orders to the Court, both proposed orders memorialize this ruling. kt Epstein's Proposed Order at paragraph 2 ("Epstein and his current attorneys shall be subject to an order of + +a adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +As discussed below, Epstein has violated this Court's order no less than four (4) times by repeatedly referencing the documents at issue in his filings in both the appellate and trial court.2 a therefore files this motion to compel Epstein to respect this Court's order, to strike references to the E. documents in trial court pleadings, and to award ill= his reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in bringing this motion to enforce I + +5. On March 5,\_\_2018, filed his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental E its Containing Privileged Materials Listed on ' Privilege Log ("Motion to '), which asked the Court to strike all late-disclosed exhibits and to prevent Epstein fr rther using or referencing ' privileged materials. + +6. On March 7, 2018, filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, , from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reserving + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +jurisdiction to sanction Epstein and his counsel for any violation of that order. Judge Ray's order reads in pertinent part as follows: + +[The law firm of BuniiiA., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs wit rs added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special I • lintical set to Farmer, who will use same to create its privilege log . . will not retain, any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor I or copies of said documents be re memory of copiers. Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its car or loathe Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor o , Brad or his client. + +# The Court's Blanket Confidentiality Order Prohibiting Epstein from Referring to the Privileged Documents + +,Nms 7. On March 8, 2018, the Court held a %n time the Court granted the motion and orde sealed. Sac 'ngs referencing the e-mails at issue to be ' Motion to Strike, at which + +possession of 8. In apparent recognit 'n hat the only credible explanation for Epstein's unexplained ' priviltna erials was that Judge Ray's order had been violated3, the Court also entered the fo blanket confidentiality order prohibiting any reference to, use, or dissemination by t tein of any of the documents contained on the= IM CD: + +[W]hatth tomeys t here recognize — and Mr. Epstein is also under this order — is that no further dissemination is going to be made. I think that goes without saying as far as the attorneys are concerned . . . I think they recognize that when this Court makes a statement, it is abundantly clear that it will be enforced to the letter. I have no doubt in my mind that they will all be respectful of the court order of non-dissemination of any of those documents hence forth. + +3 Epstein and possession and retention of the CD at issue is currently the subject of a Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause that was filed in the Bankruptcy Court on March 19, 2018. The Bankruptcy Court has scheduled a hearing on that motion for April 13, 2018. + +3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 78:7-19 (emphasis added). + +As a general blanket order I would simply say that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject to this order of confidentiality, of sealing and of non-dissemination of any such information that is contemplated in any of the documents that are part of the umbrella order of Judge Ray. And that would include all of the exhibits that we spoke about today and that have been filed as a matter of record. + +3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 79:9-18 (emphasis added). + +0 + +9. As previously stated, each party included explicit e memorializing this broad ruling in their competing proposed orders ona to Strike Untimely Exhibits, et al, which were submitted to the Court late last wee 1c4\ r 111(2 nsteration. + +### Epstein's Repeated Violation of the CouretBla ket Confidentiality Order + +10. Despite this Court's crystal-cfasrcir that Epstein is prohibited from referencing any of the information contained in ents at issue, Epstein has nonetheless repeatedly characterized the contents of ents in his filings in both the trial court and appellate proceedings. Epstein's purpo isregarding this Court's order appears to be to "poison the well" by mischaracterizin relevance, significance, and content of the emails. + +# A. Violations in the Appellate Proceedings. + +11. In the appellate proceedings, Epstein has violated this Court's order no less than three times by referring to the documents at issue. + +12. First, in his Response in Opposition to Motion for Partial Relief from Stay filed on March 14, 2018, Epstein not only gratuitously referenced the documents, but also mischaracterizes their contents in an improper attempt to influence the Fourth District Court of Appeal. Specifically, Epstein states as follows: + +Second, the alleged eight-year-old "confidential" information to w refers is 47 exhibits comprised of a series of communicatio and other attorneys, including Scott Rothstein, that eviscerate ' case against Epstein in its entirety . . . Mornessa , their face, all of these tight-year-old communications clearly show that' claims of work product simply do not apply. These inculpatory communications cannot constitute work-product. They directly relate to issues that =S himself has made central to this case and their content provides independent grounds to reject work product protection, including both the crime fraud exception and potential unprofessional conduct . . . the trial court refused to evaluate these issues, choosing instead to exclude the communications on the basis of what the Court believed was Epstein's untimely request to identify them on his Exhibit List. + +Epstein's Response in Opposition at p. 3-4 (emphasi XS,/ + +13. Over Epstein's objection, the F otS , CA nonetheless granted in part Motion for Partial Relief from Stay onErch i 12/ " 2 18. + +14. Immediately therea , y three days after the Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause was fil again Epstein in the bankruptcy proceedings, Epstein filed his own Motion for Order t oti.s...\_ Show ause Why is Not in Violation of This Court's Order Dated March 20, 2948, Ot tirig "In Part" Motion for Partial Relief from Stay.4 In that motion, Epst oi ce ain demonstrated his disregard for this Court by referencing the e a doc t issue: + +Included among those issues to be perfected at the trial court is ' errant claim of "privilege" which remains a cloud below preventing the admission of crucial evidence that Epstein maintains is dispositive of this case. That evidence must be reviewed in camera by the trial court while the appellate issues are under review. Consistent with this Court's interest in "fairness" and "efficient use of the trial court's time and resources," Epstein will be narrowing + +The Fourth DCA denied Epstein's Motion for Order to Show Cause on March 29, 2018. + +a adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +> his request for in camera review down from 27,000 pages to a readily manageable fraction, 47 exhibits numbering approximately 100 pages. + +Epstein's Motion for Order to Show Cause at p. 8 (emphasis added). + +15. Epstein further disregarded this Court's blanket confidentiality order on March 26, 2018, when he again referenced the== documents in his Reply to to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, as follows: ' Response + +In fact, ' counterclaim is thoroughly disproved by direct documentary evidence of own misconduct and credibility that Epstein is currently asking the trial court to review for presentation to the jury when this case is tried. + +Epstein's Reply to Response to Petition for Writ of Ce ior ri at p. 1 (emphasis added). As the Court is aware, no such request for in-camera i -S, n been made, and therefore this representation to the Appellate Court was im S . s it + +#### B. Violations in the Trial Court Proe gs. + +16. On March 29, 2018, faced With the pending Motion for Issuance of Order to Show Cause in the bankruptcy proceeding regarding the clear violation of Judge Ray's order, and having c .,- \_-1 had his own Motion for Sbow Cause Order denied by the Appellate Court, Epstein filed a Motion i / 7 to Address Schedr g and Professionalism, directed to undersigned counsel. The frivolousness of that motion, ppears to be nothing more than another attempt to "poison the well," is evident on its f + +17. Continuing with what can only be described as a lack of respect for this Court, however, Epstein again referenced the e-mails contained on the CD that are the subject of this Court's blanket confidentiality and non-dissemination Order. Specifically, Epstein states as follows: + +Recent events (appeal and stailithe of that total [sic] eviscerate Counter-Plaintiff (' ") claims and shines a light on his true motivation have prompted unprofessional behavior from EMI and his counsel evidenced by the unilateral setting of hearings, certificates of conferring that never happened and intentional ex pane attendance at a hearing despite knowing of Epstein's counsel's unavailability. + +Epstein's Motion to Address Scheduling at p. 1 (emphasis added). + +- 18. Simply put, Epstein's repeated violations of this Court's order must end. + +### Conclusion + +Undersigned counsel wholeheartedly agrees with this Court's pronouncement that "when this Court makes a statement, it is abundantly clear that it will be enforced to the letter." The statement made by this Court at the March 8, 2018 hearing, and memorialized in each parties' 7 competing proposed orders, was clear: "all attomey-who have or are representing Mr. Epstein . shall be subject to this order of confidentiality, of sealing and of non-dissemination of any such information that is contemplated i ny of the documents that are part of the umbrella order of Judge Ray." Epstein's deci c i6n hts iiregard that Order and to instead repeatedly refer to and 1 argumentatively mischaracteriz documents is unacceptable and should not be tolerated. This Court has t p wer to enforce its orders, and respectfully requests that it exercise that clear authority. + +Epstein's decision to violate Judge Ray's Order concerning the retention and possession of the documents at issue is currently pending before the United States Bankruptcy Court, and Epstein will be required to answer for his disregard of that court's order. He must be compelled to answer for his disregard of this Court's order as well. + +a adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +WHEREFORE, respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion for Sanctions Regarding Epstein's Violations of Court Order, striking all references to the documents contained in the== CD in Epstein's trial court pleadings, and awarding a his attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the enforcement of is Court's order. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forego' Si t via E-Serve C to all Counsel on the attached list, this 3rd day of April, 2018. + +> JAC 04 ar No.: 169 0 N E. TERRY rida Bar No.: 45780 AVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mails: isx searcvlaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-3 451, Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] is adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7baea983dd28923d9a323530147079c2c8f1febc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387/EFTA02766387.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,623 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766387.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 17800, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 108.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 108.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLA ON OF COURT ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 489.7080993652344, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 489.7080993652344, + 337.85302734375 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 337.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'Sum an,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.76617431640625, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 333.54, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 333.54, + 418.85302734375 + ], + [ + 278.76617431640625, + 418.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 238.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 342.33599853515625, + 238.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 342.33599853515625, + 252.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 252.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Court's Blanket Confidentiality Order Prohibiting Epstein from Referring to the \nPrivileged Documents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 335.60302734375 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 335.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Repeated Violation of the CouretBla ket Confidentiality Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 496.33200000000005, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 496.33200000000005, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Violations in the Appellate Proceedings.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 316.3753967285156, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 316.3753967285156, + 540.3530120849609 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 540.3530120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Violations in the Trial Court Proe \ngs.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 331.998046875, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 331.998046875, + 416.9730224609375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 416.9730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 338.51495361328125, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 338.51495361328125, + 265.10302734375 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 265.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766387" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..791cbb588e22bcd93bdf17d1d89410d5d87eff2e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.md @@ -0,0 +1,5867 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408002OOOCM13AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiffiCotmter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +O SA + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF l' E EIN'S SUPPLEMENT' TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DEC '. RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND W ECIFIC REOUEST FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW TO DETERMINE RELEV PPLICABILITY AND/OR WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILE Alsp 'ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Art WITH REGARD TO S \ litICUMENTS + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, Jeffre te rEpstein'), moves this Court for an in camera inspection to confirtn the ml and the absence and/or waiver of, any attorneyclient privilege and work-produ t n for the 47 documents2 identified on Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List which laintiff J. ('a") has improperly withheld from discovery, r the Court to find that all such documents withheld on the basis of irrelevance, a -client privilege and attorney work product should be unsealed, produced and dee^ h. ible at trial, and states: + +&#x27;The original Motion was filed on March 5, 2018, but not ruled on before the March 9, 2018, appellate court stay. + +2Edwards identified 49 e-mails on Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List that he alleged were privileged, however, two of those e-mails were pages within other exhibits and the total number of alleged "privileged" exhibits is 47. Epstein may be able to reduce the number of documents for the Court's in camera review even further if the Court 1S t the exhibits so Epstein's counsel can review them and select those most dispositivc of the issues has made central in this case. + +### PREFACE + +No Court, not this Court or the Special appointed by the Bankruptcy Court, has ever conducted an in camera inspection of the documents identified on February 23, 2011 privilege log3 ruled by this Court to be legally deficient and in violation of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and binding legal precedent. Now that the appellate court has made this time available to address pending matters, it is up to this Court to determine whether conceal and withhold from the jury clearly relevant, case-ending evidence that for to satisfy his heavy burden to establish a cause of action a ontinue to it impossible em for malicious prosecution. Although Epstein is asking the Court to conduct a 1. i i camera review of 47 documents4, none of the documents, in fact, are attorney-cl unications, and waived his work-product protections with regard to t as it should, that none of the 47 documents pmtnunications between clients, and therefore that they are not sub should be permanently unsealed, d be permitted to introduce them evi e at trial. has ents. Once this Court confirms, and his trio e attorney-client privilege, these documents ced and ruled to be admissible, and Epstein should + +### INTRODUCTION + +The 47 d c ents , ferred to as " ' " that Epstein asks this Court to igiHnti camera di recO la to the strength of clients' cases against Epstein, + +3Th February/ 23, 2011 privile.S. was prepared by when he was working at the law firm of =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("= Jaffe"), which is now dissolved. While arlilege tl log is entitled in the name of that firm, for purposes of this Motion, it will be referred to as' privilege log." + +`Epstein has segregated the news .i lentified c-mails from his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List, which include the 47 documents claims are "privileged" as well as other documents over which a privilege has not been claimed. Pursuant to the Court's direction at the March 8, 2018, hearing, to preserve his appellate rights, Epstein will file those exhibits under seal upon the Court's entry of a scaling order. To assist the Court, the 47 exhibits for the Court's in camera review arc identified on Exhibit A. + +association and interaction with Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), MR damages claim, and the overall credibility of allegations against Epstein. These e-mails arc not only relevant and material, they eviscerate case, making it impossible for him to satisfy his heavy burden to prove the absence of probable cause for Epstein to have filed suit against him. Epstein is entitled to have the Court and jury consider these e-mails as it determines whether Epstein exceeded the wide latitude which the law confers on all plaintiffs "to use their b t dgment in prosecuting ... a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a sub t civil action for misconduct." Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, & Frappier v So. 2d 380, 384 (Fla. 2007)(quoting from Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, tchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994)). + +As explained fully below, has impro eld these undeniably relevant emails from valid discovery requests for more \ a years after having waived any even remotely arguable protection that might ap would never see the light of day, deceptively worded 1,607-en , 159- e privilege log that this Court found was insufficient on its face and did not comp with e requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)5 and TIG Ins. Corp.. Joh n, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Despite efforts, however, the ' s c been discovered (albeit inadvertently). Lacking any legal justification for wi m in the first place, and having concealed this misconduct through a deceptively vague and n-compliant privilege log designed to ensure that the existence of these documents would never be detected, is now left with no choice but to protest wildly with unfounded c . Further, in order to ensure that the e-mails ncealed their existence by hiding them within a + +5Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 has been amended since the Court's Order and privilege claims are now addressed in subsection (6) of that Rule. + +allegations of "stolen" e-mails hoping that this will distract this Court from its duty to conduct an examination of the documents has so improperly withheld and concealed. + +This Court has repeatedly expressed its intention to maintain a level playing field between the parties in order to ensure a fair trial. This Court has correctly recognized that in his malicious prosecution cause of action against Epstein, has an onerous burden to establish a total absence of probable cause for Epstein to have commenced and continued his 1 it. In that regard, the elements of a malicious prosecution claim are deliberately onerous. the only cause of action in Florida that escapes application of the litigation privilege solute immunity that privilege affords to plaintiffs and their counsel, so that they free to use their best judgment to prosecute their claims without fear of a retalia lawsuit. Echevarria at 384. The heavy burdens built into the elements of maliicio4 p tion are imposed in lieu of the absolute litigation privilege, so that a malicio usiro v ution claim may not be used as a tool to chill putative plaintiffs, such as Epstein, fro bQg' g suit. It is not automatically available to all who are able to defend against a la only available in those extreme c rare ances in which a successful defendant can prove that the plaintiff had absolutely ii basis iiiir o file suit against him in the first place. Thus, in order for to recove ?c rins pstein for filing suit against him, is put to the substantial lit a resulting recovery against them. Rather, it is task of demo g at Epstein had no probable cause for filing suit against him. + +wards must demonstrate a complete absence of probable cause to recover against Eps in, all Epstein need show to defeat counterclaim is the barest showing of probable cause, the standard for which has been aptly described as "extremely low and easily satisfied." v. Kostroff, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2000).6 Epstein maintains that + +6 See V. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (5th DCA 1984)("Probable cause in the context of a civil suit is measured by a lesser standard than in a criminal suit. But obviously less in the way of grounds + +he has already established probable cause as a matter of law based upon, among other things: (a) undisputed extrinsic evidence of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme; (b) a third-party lawsuit alleging the use of case files from client cases against Epstein to support the Ponzi scheme; and (c) the identification of specific litigation misconduct by that corroborates the third-party allegations that the purpose of the litigation misconduct was to enhance the value of those cases to more effectively use them to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. + +disputes none of the evidence proffered by Epstein and es no direct evidence of Epstein's state of mind. Instead, he asserts that Epstein ve relied on this evidence for probable cause. As support for this assertion, as the central issues in the trial of his counterclaim against Epstein: (a) the stren lients' cases against Epstein; (b) the lack of any association between Rothstein an fjEh ards or clients' cases against Epstein; and (c) the legitimacy of Edw ' ation conduct in his clients' cases against Epstein. further claims that he h\_ag and continues to suffer damages arising out of his "anxiety" from Epstein's corn as filed more than eight years ago and dismissed six years ago because it: (a) f sely c acterized cases as "weak"; (b) indicated that knew or should ave known of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme; and (c) alleged that engaged in litigatios ndu to support the Ponzi scheme. + +h already given substantial latitude to present to the jury circu ence bearing on Epstein's criminal history, his non-prosecution agreement with This + +for belief will be required to justify a reasonable man in bringing a civil rather than a criminal suit.... Mhe instigator need not have the same degree of certainty as to the facts, or even the same belief in the soundness of his case, and that he is justified in bringing a civil suit when he reasonably believes that he has a good chance of establishing it to the satisfaction of the court or jury. He may, for example, reasonably submit a doubtful issue of law, where it is uncertain which view the court will take."). + +the government, settlements with a' three clients, and the existence and settlement of other civil claims against Epstein in order to aid in disputing specific allegations in Epstein's original complaint and positing ulterior motives for Epstein's lawsuit against . For the playing field to be level, if there is evidence regarding conduct that has a direct bearing on whether Epstein had probable cause to commence or continue the lawsuit, whether in fact incurred any damages as a result of Epstein's lawsuit, or indeed whether Edw Ilegations against Epstein are at all credible, it is imperative that such evidence be laid b fore the jury. To bring to life this Court's intention to level the playing field in a tria aw imposes an onerous burden on to recover against Epstein for exercisin \*ght that all plaintiffs have to seek legal redress through the courts, this Court mus jury to review these e-mails and fully evaluate misconduct, the true jai( clients' cases and the anxiety damages claimed by to justify recove Epstein. + +### THIS COURT MUST FI NO WORK-PRODUCT PROTECTION EX cSTS ist.O THAT IT WAS WAIVED + +### Expressly Wai rjt roduct Objections for All but New and Ongoing Cases against Epstein + +express and on multiple occasions, waived work-product protections. In negotiating the p ratio f the privilege log on February 2, 2011, Jaffe informed Epstein's co n e Special that it would omit from the log any work product objections t t ted to closed cases: + +All ork product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for materials related to new or ongoing cases AND on the condition that they be produced "For Attorneys' Eyes Only. + +(Exhibit B.) Jaffe told the Special he would then only need to review and make privilege determinations as to work product materials for existing cases and attorney-client privilege materials. Id. + +Jaffe confirmed this agreement more than once: + +[February 9, 2011] "We also have 2 more boxes that contain work product materials what we will turn over subject to the agreement that Plaintiff will not assert any privilege has been waived by turning them over now, and further subject to the agreement that they be produced `For Attorneys' Eyes Only." (Exhibit C.) + +[February 16, 2011] "Do you still want to do the attorney's eyes only? Do you want to speed it up or not? You'll uet work-product stuff if you agree to the attorney's-eyes only." Epstein's counsel confirmed their agreement. (Exhib D.) + +This representation was significant. At the time Jaffe made thi hration re to Epstein, the three cases had been litigating against Epstein w Rothstein's partner at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA") had long been s'. Thus, based on Jaffe's representation, was sup have produced all e-mails reflecting work product pertaining to the three closed E because they did not pertain to "new or ongoing cases." While at the time of a ion had other clients who had claims against Epstein, those, too, have oy 'S been settled', and none of those claims remain pending against Epstein. + +Although did, in ce documents as "attorneys' eyes only" in February 2011, it has now come to light t ards only produced select items, and specifically withheld inculpatory e-mails pertat his closed cases against Epstein, despite agreement not to withhold wor ct pertaining to the closed cases.8 To the extent that the 47 e-mails + +7ards settled his ts' claims against Epstein in August 2011. + +sTo he extent that claims documents relating to L.M. and E.W. were not produced because of some tangential privilege based on the pending Crimes Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA") action against the United States Go ri i, this lacks merit. None of the subject e-mails arc communications between the government and clients or their counsel or implicate any issues relevant to the CVRA rtantly, othe ng a Notice of Change of Address in the CVRA action in April 2009 when joined RRA, did nothing in that action while he was at RRA. In fact, the first filing made in the CVRA action after April 2092atiais September 2010 after the court administratively closed the case for inactivity — almost a year after left RRA. (See excerpt of CVRA Court Docket attached as Exhibit E.) + +identified for the Court's in camera review relate to actual cases litigated against Epstein, they were closed cases. If work-product protection ever even arguably applied to them, the emails were not then work product from "new or ongoing cases," and should have been included in the production to Epstein's counsel that represented included all work product except for "new or ongoing cases." Moreover, because all of clients' claims against Epstein have now settled, in reliance on Previous waiver and agreement to produce th sate, Epstein is asking the Court to compel to produce all such c-mails withheld bast work product, or at least to deem the 47 e-mails to have been produced, and unseal t ew of waiver regarding work product from closed cases, an in camera view) of those c-mails is unnecessary and the Court need not make any further detertninatiorke. For the additional reasons explained below, Epstein also asks that this Court rule the 47 e-mails to be admissible at trial. + +### Work-Product Protection Was Waived by Sharing with Third Parties — as Admittedly Did With Razorback + +Additionally, counsel r eded on March 8, 2018, that the c-mails were shared with the Conrad, Scherer law fi o nscl for Razorback. Clearly, Razorback sought their production to prove its allegatt s i the Razorback lawsuit that Rothstein used the three cases against Epstein, in part, investors into the Ponzi scheme. If provided the documents that h ims are privileged (both attorney-client and work product) in this case to Conrad, S waived those privileges when produced the e-mails to Conra , c e r. As a result of that waiver, none of the c-mails were properly withheld by on the basis of attorney-client privilege, and all should now be deemed to have been produced, unsealed and ruled admissible at trial. + +### III. Work-Product Protection Was Waived bv=l1 Issue Injection + +- Anxiety Damages for Being Sued +- "Weak" Cases +- "I Did Nothing Wrong" + +Among other things, the e-mails relate directly to the strength (or lack thereof) of now-settled three clients' cases against Epstein, the extent of Rothstein's interaction with as it relates to those cases, and the credibility of claims for damages bas "anxiety" he claims to have suffered and continues to suffer from Epstein's lawsuit. Redly, has made these central issues in his malicious prosecution counterclai pstein. Because the c-mails directly relate to the very issues injected in alicious prosecution counterclaim, they are critical to a proper evaluation of its gany work-product protection that may have applied to them should be deemed to h ived by reason of issue injection. + +Both and Epstein's co a rmliar with waiver of work-product protection by issue injection, having litigated S ) •• reviously. See Tolz v. Geico General Ins. Co., No. 08-80663, 2010 WL 384745 ( D. F . an. 27, 2010). In Tolz, non-party Searcy Denney argued that the "doctrine of wairyissue injection" did not apply (to attorney-client privilege). Id. at \*2. After analyzin th attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, the court concluded th at ey-client privilege had not been waived. Id. at \*4. However, the court cited f aw recognizing that the work-product protection "is not inviolate and may be invaded w the information contained within the work-product materials is directly at issue." Id. (emphasis added). In Tolz, therefore, the court did exactly what this Court should do — ordered an in camera review to determine whether any privilege existed or had been waived by placing the information contained in the documents directly at issue in that action. Id. at \*5. + +Case law distinguishes between affirmatively injecting an issue rather than simply defending one. Home Ins. Co. v. Advance Machine Co., 443 So. 2d 165, 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (no waiver in simply bringing or defending an action). Exceptions to the general rule have been applied where the partyseeking to avoid discovery has injected into the litigation issues going to the very heart of the litigation. Id., citing Hearn v. Rhay, 68 F.R.D. 574 (E.D. Wash. 1975); Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre, 86 F.R.D. 444 (S.D. Fla. 1980). + +Here, unlike in Tolz, has repeatedly injected issues into this li n in an attempt to satisfy burden to establish Epstein's lack of probable ca goes to the very heart of malicious prosecution cause of action. ore waived any workproduct protection of evidence relevant to these issues. Th waiver by issue injection is even stronger because the content of the e-mails in ects admissions by and his co-counsel as to the very issues haQin ted in this case, the evidence of which is simply unavailable through any other mea + +### IV. Deceptive Concea e 47 E-mails on a Legally Deficient Privilege Log in Violation of Florida gy 41f, vil Procedure. Binding Precedent and the Express Orders of this Court is turtlipilVaiver + +waivers further mandated by his deliberate concealment of the e-mails in question on a 159- ge p ilege log that was determined by this Court on May 7, 2012 to be legally defici ( s i 'fa cc and to have utterly failed to comply with the legal requirements of Florida ul it Procedure 1.280(13)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp. v.M, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2 1). (Exhibit F.) It was through this device that prevented the e-mails from ever seeing the light of day despite ME' misrepresentations to Epstein's counsel that all emails qualifying as work product in closed cases against Epstein had been produced. While the emails remained concealed through MI improper device, continued to prosecute his + +counterclaim against Epstein based on the very issues directly refuted by e-mails concealed from existence. should not be rewarded for such unethical gamesmanship. + +The TIG court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order requiring T1G to produce documents for which objections on the basis of attorney-client and work-product privileges were made. The Fourth District Court of Appeal noted that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(bX5) [now (6)] is identical to its federal counterpart, Federal R e of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5), whose Advisory Committee Notes state that: "To withho teria s without such notice is contrary to the rule, subjects the party to sanctions unde X2) and may be viewed as a waiver of the privilege or protection." TIC at 340. The ourt further observed that Local Rule 26.1(GX3)(b) of the United States Distri or the Southern District of Florida spelled out the requirements for a valid privil + +Where a claim of privilege is asserted in demand, or sub-part thereof, and an assertion: to any interrogatory or document of provided on the basis of such + +- (i) The attorney asserting the v all in the objection to the interrogatory or document demand, or s ereof, identify the nature of the privilege (including work produ whr is being claimed and if the privilege is being asserted in connection a laim or defense governed by state law, indicate the state's privilege n4e being Invoked; and +- (ii) The foil of such in rmation shall be provided in the objection, unless divulgence lion would cause disclosure of the allegedly privileged information: ents: (1) the type of document; (2) general subject matter of the , (3) the date of the document; (4) such other information as is sufficient fy the document for a subpoena duces tecum, including, where appropriate, the luthor of the document, the addressee of the document, and where not apparent, the relationship of the author and addressee to each other. ... + +The Fourth District Court of Appeal also quoted with approval from Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp., No. 97-C-1292, 2000 WL 1863543 (N.D. III. Dec. 14, 2000), in which the court stated that a privilege log should: + +... also describe the document's subject matter, purpose for its production, and a specific explanation of why the document is privileged or immune from discovery. These categories, especially this last category, must be sufficiently detailed to allow the court to determine whether the discovery opponent has discharged its burden of establishing the requirements expounded upon in the foregoing discussion. Accordingly, descriptions such as "letter re claim," "analysis of claim," or "report in anticipation of litigation"—with which we have grown all too familiar—will be insufficient. This may be burdensome, but it will provide a more accurate evaluation of a discovery opponent's claims and takes into consideration the fact that there are no presumptions operating in the discovery opponent's favor. failure to comply with these directions will result in a finding that the p discovery opponents have failed to meet their burden to establish the a of the privilege. Y iff o + +Id. at \*3 (citations omitted). + +Simply put, a privilege log must be sufficient on its face to alio eviewer to understand enough to determine whether a privilege claim should be c + +On August 17, 2012, the Court vacated the Order, but did not relieve of the requirement to provide a new fully comp vilege log. In fact, the Court's August 17, 2012, Order provides, in pertinent part: + +(Au Order) (emphasis added) (Exhibit G). failed to provide a compliant privilege log as required, his February 23, 2011 privilege log is clearly invalid and the protections asserted thereunder should be deemed to have been waived in light of MI' failure to comply with the Court's Order. + +shall file a n se specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 20 as red in this Court's April 10, 2012 Order. The response shall identify vileged responsive documents previously produced, shall be accomp ied by a non-privileged responsive documents not previously produced, if an all identify. in a proper privilege log as referenced in this Co u 7. 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from product' the basis of any assertion of privilege. This response shall be filed with' m the date of this Order. + +Because blatantly disregarded the Court's Order, as well as the requirements of Florida's Rules of Civil Procedure and the TIG case, the February 23, 2011 privilege log remains + +wholly deficient. It misstates objections, improperly identifies or altogether excludes the required identities of the document authors and recipients, and its document descriptions arc deceptively vague and misrepresent the true nature of the documents listed on the privilege log. Had ever provided a legally sufficient privilege log, Epstein would have been afforded the opportunity to identify as early as February 23, 2011, the improper assertions of attorney-client privilege, work-product protection and irrelevancy made by with respect to 7 e-mails. Because the c-mails are under seal, Epstein cannot specifically address the nt of each to demonstrate how was able to conceal them through his d ficient and noncompliant privilege log. However, the following few examples of tnerous defects in the privilege log will enable this Court to readily confirm the co ficiency oe invalid privilege log, both generally and particularly as it re 47 e-mails in question9: + +- Individuals who were copied e. r cc or bcc on e-mails were fiat ntifi on th r rivil e lo ut the privilege log, also generally referred to the sen rnients of the e-mails using unlawful group descriptions sue meys at RRA," or "RRA Staff," or identified them as "C t Sources" without any basis in law for such identification. In es refer to a "Confidential Source" to which a work product jecti as asserted.10 Such vague identification made it possible to conc f Epstein the highly relevant fact that Rothstein was either the >ythor or a recipient of the e-mails in question. +- Ed provided wholly insufficient document descriptions on his log. For example, 394 entries included the document description gall6n Strategy." Many of these are included in the 47 e-mails for the 's review (e.g., Appendix #36/Trial Exhibit 13-7; Appendix #70/Trial ÷s bit 13-17). As another example, on page 81 of the privilege log, the description for 01527 (Appendix #3/Trial Exhibit 13-5) is given as "New Victim" however, the Court's cursory review of that document may demonstrate that description to be improperly vague, false and misleading. + +ir A provides a comparison 47 e-mails as identified on Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to privilcisries. complete privilege log is attached as Exhibit H. + +In May 2012, produced more than 80 e-mails with "Confidential Sources" that he had previously withheld based on a work product privilege which are identified on his privilege log. Those documents were identified on Epstein's November 2017 Exhibit List. See Exhibit I. + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|------|------------|------------|------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1527 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] | New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights. | + +- • [REDACTED] objected to 938 entries on the privilege log on the basis of the documents being “irrelevant & not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” The 47 e-mails Epstein asks this Court to review *in camera* are highly relevant and do lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and the Court’s review alone of this limited number of documents will confirm that. In fact, by just getting a flavor of the e-mails, this Court already determined them to be detrimental to Edwards’ counterclaim and beneficial to Epstein’s defense of the same. The following is but one example of how the document shown to the Court at the March 8, 2018, hearing (Appendix #1/Trial Exhibit 13-67) is portrayed: + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------------|----------|--------------|------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 04403-04416 | 10/17/09 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Punitive Damages | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +- • [REDACTED] objected to 994 entries on the basis of “work product” and “attorney-client” privilege, however, only 19 of those entries were with a client. As set forth above, [REDACTED] “work product” objections throughout the privilege log, if even remotely applicable, were waived by reason of [REDACTED] Jaffie’s express agreement to produce work product documents for claims that were no longer pending, the prior production of the same documents to Razorback’s counsel or [REDACTED] issue injection. In addition, the failure to identify the client as an author or recipient of the document, coupled with a vague and misleading document description ensures that no specific claim of attorney-client privilege could ever be evaluated without seeking court review of every one of the 994 entries on the privilege log as to which attorney-client privilege was asserted. + +This Court should not countenance [REDACTED] concealment of material evidence directly relevant to issues he has made central to this case in flagrant disregard for the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, established precedent and the orders of this Court. Rather, as authorized in *TIG*, the Court should deem [REDACTED] misconduct to have effected a waiver of objections with respect + +to the 47 c-mails, unseal that evidence, deem it to have been produced to Epstein and rule it admissible at trial. + +### NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE EXISTS + +Despite and Paul Cassell's (counsel for the intervenors) protestations to the contrary, the 47 e-mails are not attorney-client privileged communications between any other co-counsel) and his three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Rather, the documents are e-mails among attorneys and staff within RRA, with M media sources and do not qualify for that protection as codified in Statutes. (or ajority of ell, and with 2 of the Florida + +Under Florida's Evidence Code, "[a] client has a prevent any other person from disclosing, the conten other person learned of the communications services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. is "confidential" if it is not intendedfd be s Ibsed to third persons other than: o refuse to disclose, and to ntial communications when such they were made in the rendition of legal .'A communication between lawyer and client + +- 1. Those to whom to the client. +- 2. Those reaspably necessary for the transmission of the communication. is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services + +Las Olas River Hoyle e Codf/o. Assn, Inc. v. Lorh, LLC, 181 So. 3d 556, 557-58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); § 90.5 c), a. Stat. (2017). The second exception applies to agents of the client—for exampl mily member acts on behalf of an incapacitated relative, Wine v. Wine, 126 So. 3d 1076 a. 4th DCA 2012), or when a messenger is needed for a client to contact counsel, Gerheiser v. Stephens, 712 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Nothing in the description of the 47 e-mails, including the identification of the sender or recipients of the same, or the description of the e-mails themselves, provides any basis to conclude that the documents constitute or reflect attorney-client communications in the rendition of legal services to a client. + +Furthermore, the attorney-client privilege may be disregarded under certain circumstances. For instance, the privilege may be disregarded where client permission was granted to disclose a privileged communication to an adverse third party, as was apparently true in the case of disclosure of the e-mails to Conrad, Scherer, or as was also true in the case oa disclosure of attorney-client communications with L.M. and E.W. in filings in the CVRA action. Additionally, there is no privilege for an attorney-client communication if the la e ' services were "sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to co hat the client knew was a crime or fraud."§ 90.502(4Xa), Fla. Stat. This is known as fraud" exception to the privilege. See Douberley v. Perlmutter, 219 So. 3d 854 (Fla. 4 2017). + +Thus, several bases to challenge assertio' omey-client privilege were available to Epstein had there been a legally compli uate description in the privilege log of any document as to which asse nvilege. This Court's in camera review of the 47 e-mails will confirm that no attom ' nt rivilege applies. Moreover, in the event that this Court isolates an e-mail to whit y-client privilege might conceivably apply, it may consider I= refusal to p i e a ilege log in which that e-mail was sufficiently identified in a manner that compli with Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the binding precedent of the TIG case. As con (c ed in IG, refusal to provide a T/G-compliant identification may be viewed as 've either as a concession by that no valid attorney-client privilege ever ex espect to that e-mail or that, if it ever did, it was waived, including under any of the ci ces described above. + +### IN CAMERA REVIEW IS MANDATED BY LAW. WAS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES AND IS APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES + +No court or special has ever determined the relevancy, privilege or waiver of the emails identified on privilege log, but it is well within this Court's jurisdiction to do so now. Indeed, if a party seeks to compel the disclosure of documents that the opposing party claims are protected by attorney-client privilege and/or work-product protection, a al court's in camera review of the documents prior to disclosure is required by law. Ben Acifralv. es, 84 So. 3d 373, 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Old Holdings, Ltd. v. Taplin, H v & A.A., 584 So. 2d 1128, 1128-29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (finding the •ocuments may be protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work- doctrine, the petitioners are entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the I nor to disclosure). + +Moreover, has already agreed to r a review: + +...we're not attempting to hide an r g. want to conduct an in-camera inspection, we want you to conduct r era inspection because it will confirm that were not attempting to hid + +(3/8/18, Aft. Tr. (Scarola), p. 15 Exhibit J.) Epstein now expressly moves for the Court to conduct that review li the 47 e-mails. + +This entitlement mera inspection of materials claimed to be privileged is a twoway street and a rtglfthat either party is entitled to under Florida law. See Zanardi v. Zanardi, 647 So. 2d 29%; i)CA 1994)(petition for writ of certiorari granted when trial court denied motion co computer diskettes on basis of attorney-client privilege and trial court did not determine in camera whether assertion of the privilege was valid). This reciprocal approach is fair and logical because without the review, the party objecting to disclosure of potentially privileged material can be irreparably harmed ("cat out of the bag"), anj the party seeking disclosure of the non-privileged material will be denied the opportunity to present evidence that is "material and + +go[es] to the heart of their case such that no other documents can be substituted for those remaining in respondent's custody." See Acevedo v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 68 So. 3d 949, 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011Xcertiorad granted because denial of in camera review was departure from essential requirements of law and irreparable harm demonstrated by showing information critical to case would not be known or available to appellate court for review otherwise). Here, both parties seek in camera review, but for different reasons. claims he has "nothing to review to confirm this. Epstein believes these e-mails go to the heart of thi cause for bringing the original civil proceeding and continuing it, as we of damages and complete lack of credibility. and seeks , his probable dwards' absence + +Additional equitable considerations make in earner Court has already recognized that some of the counterclaim and beneficial to Epstein's defens same: yen more appropriate. The were detrimental to + +And I understand what you're goin: because I've gotten a flavor for some f th ument that have . ... And that is that they are detrimental to the d that they are helpful to the position taken by Mr. Epstein. + +(3/8/18, Aft. Tr. 51:23-52:5) (E Exhibit J). Without these 47 e-mails, will gain an unfair advantage in satis heavy burden to establish the complete absence of probable cause for Epstein to ha suit. Epstein will be denied his right to present crucial evidence that goes t• th the reasons for Epstein's lawsuit against claim by as well as the veracity of uous claims that Epstein lacked probable cause to sue and the false that he was damaged as a result of this lawsuit. It will tilt the playing field heavily against Epstein, who is to be given the latitude afforded to all plaintiffs to use their best judgment in prosecuting a claim without the fear of a retaliatory lawsuit. The in camera review is + +therefore necessary to confirm the relevance and admissibility of the 47 c-mails and ensure a fair trial. + +The Binger issue previously raised by the Court as a potential basis to deny an in camera review is inapplicable here, where the e-mails were primarily authored or received by and/or in possession since 2009. Based on this, — an officer of the court, who took an oath to "never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false sta m nt of fact" - can certainly not claim "surprise." n + +AS" Only when all relevant facts regarding misconduct by Roths Ed rds and his cocounsel "are before the judge and jury can the `search for truth an e' be accomplished." Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So. 3d 1060, 10 th DCA 2011); Loureiro v. State, 133 So. 3d 948, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013X"A a search for the truth.'). Here, the relevant facts exist in case-ending e-mails th o the very heart of Epstein's probable cause, lack of damages for Epstein's lawsuit agair st and credibility at issue in this action. Accordingly, this Co pped by the controlling law and equitable principles to perform the now substantial ed request for an in camera review of the sealed 47 emails, and to confirm th "tical y relevant nature of these e-mails and the absence or waiver of any attorney-client r work-product protection for the same. + +### URISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IS NOT AN ISSUE BEFORE THIS COURT + +not before this Court and therefore not an issue upon which should be permitted to rely in seeking to prevent this Court's in camera review is the issue pertaining to the + +&quot;Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar, https://webprodfloridabarorg/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/oath-admission-to-thellorida-bar-ada.pdt + +chain of custody and possession of the 47 e-mails before Link & Rockenbach appeared in this case. + +At election, upon motion filed by him, Jaffe, and the intervenors, that issue is now being addressed in the Bankruptcy Court.12 The Bankruptcy Court will determine if there has been a violation of one of its orders and, if necessary, the appropriate relief. That review, however, has nothing to do with this Court's jurisdiction and duty to conduct in camera inspection to determine the relevance, absence or waiver of attorney-client ege and workproduct protection, and admissibility with respect to the 47 e-mails. r e o wler firm obtained the disc from where the 47 e-mails originated is something has decided that the Bankruptcy Court should sort out. Epstein agrees a lcruptcy Court is the proper forum for that inquiry. Clearly, neither the or Epstein ever used the alleged privileged documents, otherwise, this case would nded long ago. Furthermore, it has already been established how Link & Rockenbach bt ed the disc, and this Court found all of Link & Rockenbach's conduct once it disco a formation on the disc to be entirely proper. + +### C ss ONCLUSION + +Epstein, joined p iously e y is simply asking the Court to review in camera the 47 e-mails to confi that attorney-client privilege is wholly inapplicable to all of them. As for work-produc ti , to the extent that it ever applied to the 47 e-mails, this Court's in camera review +wil Il I I that expressly waived it in February 2011 and he should be compelled produce those documents now, or such documents should be deemed to have been produced by him. Epstein further asks this Court to conduct an in camera review of the 47 e-mails + +12 During the appellate stay, M, on behalf of Jaffe, filed a Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court (In re Rothstein Roggilfgad4dier, P.A., U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR). [BR D.E. 6323.] (Exhibit K, w/o exs.) and the Intervenors then joined into that Motion, individually. [BR D.E. 6325 and 6345.] (Exhibits L and 1St) + +to confirm that they are relevant and admissible and that Epstein should be allowed to present the e-mails to the jury in order to ensure a fair trial of this matter. + +Finally, Epstein requests that he be allowed to conduct limited discovery of and Jaffe to determine why former work product documents were not produced, contrary to the parties' agreement, and who authored the deceptive and misleading privilege log descriptions. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the att i --"Iil on the Service List below on April 4, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal p Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beac Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm B 33401 (561) 727-3 727-3601 [faxj + +Link (FBN 602991) erard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) c el J. Glasser (FBN 577251) rimary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy(a)linkrocklaw.com Secondary: EserviceOlinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. ██████████

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
J. ██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Sa

| + +### INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS. ETC. + +| Ex. | Date | Document | +|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| A | N/D List of 47 c-mails identified on Epstein's 3/5/18 Clerk's Trial Exhibit | | +| B | 2/2/11 Email from | Jaffe | +| C | 2/9/11 Email from | Jaffe | +| | 2/16/11 Transcript Excerpt of Meeting with Special | Alls\' D | +| E | N/D Docket Excerpt —Jane Doe v. United States, S.D. | No. 9:08- | +| | CV-80736-KAM (CVRA Action) | a | +| F | 5/7/12 Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel Produ tion | ocuments from | +| G | 8/17/12 Order on Outstanding Discovery Mot | | +| H | 2/23/11 | Jaffe's Privile e Lo | +| I | N/D List of 85 e-mails | p ' y 2012 that are contained | +| | on his Privilege Log and that | entified on his November 2017 | +| J | 3/8/18 Hearin Transcript — A | Session Excerpts: pp. 1-2, 15, 51-52 | +| K | 3/19/18 | Jaffe's Moti or ce of an Order to Show Cause Why | +| | | and Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of | +| | Court, to Pe | cov , to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for | +| | Other A p | a ref (without exhibits) [BR D.E. 6323] | +| L | 3/20/18 | oinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show | +| | Cause | R D. 6325 | +| M | 3/30/18 L.M., | d Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause | +| | A | iate Relief D.E. 63451 | + ++6s + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### EXHIBIT A + +### 47 DOCUMENTS FROM EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5. 2018. CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST THAT EPSTEIN IS SEEKING AN IN CAMERA REVIEW OF COMPARED TO PRIVILEGE LOG + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege | +|------|-----------|-----------------------------|----------|----|--------------| +| 13-1 | 4/9/09 | | | | | +| | 3:50 p.m. | E-mall chain — from (02645) | J. | to | Adler,Q1 p.1 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description Objection | +|--------|--------|--------------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 02633- | 5/1/09 | Paul Cassell | | Response to roduct; | +| 02646 | | | | Motion to ttorney/client privilege; Consolidate' + irrelevant and not reasonably Cassell strategy. calculated to lead to the Memo for Jay discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | EPSTEIN'S W618, | CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|------|---------------------|---------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege | +| 13-4 | 4/26/09 | | | +| | E-mail chain - from | Adler to | p. 43 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 00149 | 4/26/09 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] Adler | Litigation Strategy | Work Product; attorney client privilege; irrelevant & [not] reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Log | +|------|-----------|-----------------------------|----------|---------------|---------------| +| 13-5 | 4/27/09 | | | | | +| | 2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from (01527) | | to Marc Nurik | p. 81 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| Date To From Description | Objection | +| 01527 4/27/09 Marc Nurik New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client | +| | Privilege; irreleva and not | +| reasonably ca | d to lead | +| to the dis | of miscible | +| eviden | cted by | +| priva | righ | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-6 | 4/28/09
6:17 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Edwards to Katherine Ezell
(4493-4495) | p. 22 | + +| JAFFE'S F | UAN23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | +|-----------|---------------------------| +| Date | Description Objection | +| f a | | +| k ca | Epstein- Tel. | + +| No. | | Document | | Privilege Log | +|------|----|----------------------------|---------|---------------| +| 13-7 | 09 | | | | +| | | E-mail chain - from Rob to | (00014) | p. 32 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|--------|-----------------------------------------|-------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 00014 | 5/1/09 | [REDACTED] | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product; attorney client privilege; irrelevant & [not] reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-11 | 5/28/09 | | | +| | 5:45 p.m. | E-mail chain — from William Berger to (00090) | p. 39 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | | ion | +|-------|---------|----|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| 00090 | 5/28/09 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work privil | attorney client ant & (not] | +| | | | | | reato rivacy rights | alculated to lead iscovery of admissible ce; protected by | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-13 | 6/3/09
11:47 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Paul Cassell to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | p. 42 | + +| | Date | | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|---|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 00133 | 6/23/09 | | | | | | +| | ek C .4 | t | | | | | +| | | | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product; attorney client privilege; irrelevant & [not] reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-15 | 6/3/09 | | | +| | 6:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Wayne Black to (08006) | p. 149 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 08006-08011 | 6/3/09 | [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Getting addresses for people for us to serve subpoenas | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | V | +|-------|----------------------------------------------------|---| +| No. | Date Document | | +| 13-17 | 7/13/09 | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2s | | EGE LOG | +|--------|----|-------------------------|---|-------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | | Objection | +| 5/1/09 | | Paul Cassell | | | +| | | / 1\ I C | | | +| | | | n | Work Product; attorney client | + +| No. | 7s | Privilege Document v | | | +|-------|------|----------------------|-------------------|--------| +| 13-19 | O/09 | | | | +| | | E-mail chain — from | to William Berger | p. 155 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|------|----|--------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| | | | Paul Cassell | Asset movement by Jeffrey Epstein | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13.25 | 8/3/09 | | | +| | 11:17 a.m. | E-mall chain — from Beth to Carl Under (12289) | p. 29 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG a From Description Date To Carl Under | Objettik | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| Work pr 12281- 7/30/09 Litigation | ttor ey | +| client Strategy | • irrelevant & | +| [not] | calculated | +| t | discovery of le evidence; ed by privacy rights | + +| | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, C | ' ML EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|----------------------------|------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | t | Privilege | +| 13-30 | 8/11/09 | | | +| | E-mail chain -Ze e: | rik to Scott Rothstein | | + +| | | RUARY | 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-----------|--------------|-------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | rom | Description | Objection | +| 8/19/09 | Attorneys at | | | | +| 26479- AS | RRA liczkr | Jenne | Assistance on the Epstein Case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-34 | 8/13/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein
(26480) | p. 150 | + +| | | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|----------|--------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 8/19/09 | Attorneys at | | | | +| 26479- [ | RRA | Ken Jenne | Assistance on the Epstein Case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-35 | 8/13/09
5:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Scott Rothstein
(26356) | p. 86 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2 | AGE LOG | +|------------------------|------------------| +| Date To From Pes | Objection | +| 26356 8/13/09 Scott | | +| Adler | es rch | +| : | ses of | +| a | n against | +| ie‘% | privacy rights l | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-36 | 8/13/09
6:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein
(26570) | p. 150 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|--------------------|------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 26570 | 8/13/09 | Scott
Rothstein | Marc Nurik | Discussions
about Epstein | Work product;
attorney/client privilege;
irrelevant and not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of the admissible
evidence; protected by
privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Log | +|-------|-----------|-----------------------------------|----------|------------------|---------------| +| 13-44 | 9/4/09 | | | | | +| | 6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain — from (03731-03732) | | to Spencer Kuvin | p. 17 | + +| Date | To | | | | +|--------|---------|------|------------------------|----------------| +| 9/4/09 | J. | | | | +| | Spencer | From | Description | Objelidoli | +| 03719- | Kuvin | ni | depo notices attached. | Joint-priviJ e | + +C C) + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-45 | 9/10/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Bradley Edwards to redrum
(06406-06408) | p. 46 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|----------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06404-06408 | 9/10/09 | [REDACTED] | Pat Diaz | NR Interview | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | + +| EPEPSTEN'S | MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| i te No. | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 13- , 09 | | | +| E-mail chain - from 06 p.m. (01686) | to Mike Fisten | p. 84 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 01686 | 9/11/09 | Mike Fisten | Potential new witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client
Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | Privilege Log | +|-------|-----------|-----------------------------------|----------|----|----------|---------------| +| 13-47 | 9/17/09 | | | | | | +| | 8:35 a.m. | E-mail chain—from (11123 — 11125) | | to | Peterson | p. 57 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 11123-11136 | 9/17/09 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information RE: Epstein Molestations | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S | | thrr um. | | +|-------|----------------------------------|--------|----------|-----------| +| No. | Date Docu | | | Privilege | +| 13-49 | 9/19/09 | | | | +| | E-mail chain —from B E | rds to | Peterson | p. 57 | + +| | JAFFE'S | | RY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|---------|--------------|----|---------------------------|-----------| +| | | | Description | Objection | +| 9/17/09 | Confidential | | | | +| | Source Ed | ds | | | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-52 | 9/30/09
3:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff
(25925) | p. 46 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 25925 | 9/30/09 | All Staff | Robin T.
Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege
and/or work product | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-53 | 9/30/09
3:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Robin T. Kempner to All Staff
(25874) | p. 46 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 25874 | 9/30/09 | All Staff | Robin T.
Kempner | Additional name
added to conflict
check | Attorney/Client privilege
and/or work product | + +| No. | Date | Docum | | | Privilege Lo | +|-------|-----------|--------------------------|---|-------------------|--------------| +| 13-56 | 10/5/09 | | | | | +| | | E-mail chain -from Bradl | r | to William Berger | p. 114 | +| | 7:16 a.m. | (11145) A. | | | | + +| | | | JAFFE'S FJStUA | , 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | +|--------|---------|---------|----------------|----------------------| +| | Date | To | | Description | +| 11143- | 10/4/09 | William | Bradley | 11/28 Discovery | +| 11146 | | Berger | Cwarde | Cutoff | + +| aL \--- | Date | | | | | +|---------|-----------|-----------------------------------|----------|----------------|---------------| +| No. | | | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 13-60 | 10/14/09 | | | | | +| | 7:36 a.m. | E-mail chain — from (03191-03192) | | to Paul Cassel | p. 95 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|--------------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 03191-03196 | 10/14/09 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | | Privilege Log | +| 13-66 | 10/17/09
1:00 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell
(04398-04402) | | | p. 64 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|--------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 04387-04402 | 8/19/09 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Victim
Complaints,
Forensic
accountants, &
Epstein's
Fraudulent
Transfers | W/P; Attorney Client
Privilege; Irrelevant and not
reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible
evidence; protected by
privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-67 | 10/17/09
1:58 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell
(04408-04412) | p. 64 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|--------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 04403-04416 | 10/17/09 | Paul Cassell | Punitive Damages | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-86 | 10/23/09
11:37 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to Mark Fistos,
█████ Adler, █████ Scott Rothstein and
Steven Jaffe (26747) | p. 73 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| Date To From Description | Objettio)j, | +| 10/23/09 Attorneys | | +| W/P; Atto 26741- Legal Research | len?' | +| Privile: at RRA RE: causes of | ant and not | +| reaso ably action against Epstein | ulated to lead | +| t e | ' ery of admissible iden e; protected by | +| p | rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-88 | 10/23/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain – from ██████ thew Weissing to Mark Fistos and ██████ Edwards (08042-08044) | p. 73 | + +| | | RUARY | 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE | LOG | +|--------------|-----------|----------|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | orn | Description | Objection W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; | +| 10/23/09 | Attorneys | | | | +| | \CY | | action | | +| 08033- rN?Se | at R154" | e Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of against Epstein | Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-89 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from J. MT; Scott | p. 73 | +| | 12:12 p.m. | Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26741-26742) | | + +| | Date | To | From | Description Objection | +|--------|----------|-----------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 26741- | 10/23/09 | Attorneys | | Legal Research W/P; Attorney Client | +| 26763 | | at RRA | | RE: causes of Privilege; Irrelevant and not action against reasonably calculated to lead Epstein to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | Document | | ON | rivilege Log | +|-------|------------|------------------------|----------|----|--------------| +| 13-90 | 10/23/09 | | | | | +| | 12:16 p.m. | E-mail chain — from | to Matth | | p.73 | +| | | Weissing (08059-08061) | a | | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 08033-08070 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 13-93 | 10/23/09
12:27 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein,
Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26756-26758) | | p. 73 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Eprivacy rights | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Log | +|-------|------------|-----------------------------------|----------|----------------|---------------| +| 13-94 | 10/23/09 | | | | | +| | 12:36 p.m. | E-mail chain — from (08036-08038) | | to Mark Fistos | p. 73 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------------| +| Date To From Description | Objection | +| 10/23/09 Attorneys | | +| Mike Fistos Legal Research | | +| W/P; Attorney Cli 08033- | t | +| Privilege; Irrel at RRA RE: Causes of | nd not | +| reasonabl action against | ulat to lead | +| to the Epstein | of admissible | +| evicts ce; | t cted by s | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 13-97 | 10/23/09
1:26 p.m. | E-mail chain – [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] Adler, Scott
Rothstein and Mark Fistos (26762) | | p. 73 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Bradley Edwards | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | +|-------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. \ | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-98 | 10/23/09 | | | +| | 1:31 p.m. | E-mail chain —from Matthew Weissing to Adler, Mark Fistos and Steven Jaffe (01117) | p. 77 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Ob ection | +|---------|----|---------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5/12/09 | | William | | | +| 01112- | | Berger | Dr. Swan | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | :44 | 47 | +|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------| +| No. | Date | Document | (..„ | 1 Privilege Log | +| 13-100 | 10/23/09 | | | | +| | 1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to Adler (08121-08123) | Edvcalts id) ) | p. 101 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|-------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 08118-08123 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Adler | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irreleverent and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Log | +|--------|--------|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| 13-101 | 10/kit | | | | +| | 2:0 | E | II chain — from Scott Rothstein to Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26749-26752) | p. 73 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Bates | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] | Legal Research
RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client
Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | | +|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 13-102 | 10/23/09 | | | | +| | 2:05 p.m. | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to Adler (08128-08130) | and | p. 101 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date To From Description | Objection | +| 10/23/09 Attorneys | | +| Steven Jaffe Litigation 08124- at RRA Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and no easonably | +| calculated to | the | +| discovery | Q | +| | issi e | +| evidens right | cted by privacy | + +| No. | Date | | Docum | | | Privilege Log | +|--------|-----------|----------------------|-------|---|--------|---------------| +| 13-103 | 10/23/09 | | | | | | +| | | E-mail chain — from | | t | radley | p.101 | +| | 2:06 p.m. | and Mark Fistos (081 | 2 | | | | + +| | JAFFE'S F | UAlt#2.3, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|----------|-----------|------------------------------|-----------| +| Date | To | Description | Objection | +| 10/23/09 | Attorneys | | | +| | C ) | | | +| | | r Litigation | | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | | +|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----------| +| No. t. | Date | Document | | Privilege | +| 13-104 | 10/23/09 | | | | +| | 2:09 p.m. | E-mail chain—from Mark Fistos to Adler (08131-08133) | and | p. 101 | + +| | | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-------------|-----------|--------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date 08124- | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 10/23/09 | Attorneys | | | | +| | at RRA | Steven Jaffe | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT UST | | | +|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------|----|--------------| +| No. | Date | Document | ON | rivilege Log | +| 13-105 | 10/23/09 | | | | +| | | E-mail chain — from Steven Jaffe to | | p. 101 | +| | 2:09 p.m. | Mark Fistos and Adler (08124-08126) | | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------|--------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 08124-08156 | 10/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-106 | 10/23/09
2:10 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Matthew Weissing to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], Mark Fistos and [REDACTED] Adler (08135-08138) | p. 101 | + +| Date | To | | | | +|----------|------------------|--------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | From | Description | Objection | +| 16/23/09 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Log p. 74 | +|--------|-----------|-----------------------------|----------|-------------|---------------------| +| 13-107 | 10/23/09 | | | | | +| | 2:24 p.m. | Rothstein, Weissing (27494) | Adler, | and Matthew | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| Date To From Description | O . ecti | +| 27494 10/23/09 Attorneys | | +| Mike Fistos Legal Research | | +| W/P; Attorne at RRA | ii | +| Privilege; RE: Causes of | e ant d not | +| reason action against | ulated to lead | +| to the disc Epstein Okivacy,rights | of admissible evidence; p otected by | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-108 | 10/23/09
2:45 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Mark Fistos to Steven Jaffe, Scott Rothstein, Russell Adler, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Matthew Weissing (26760) | p. 73 | + +| | | | S. | | | +|--------|----------|-----------|-----|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | F | RUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE | LOG | +| | Date | To | | om Description | Objection | +| 26741- | 10/23/09 | Attorneys | dle | Legal Research | W/P; Attorney Client | +| | | at Rpm | | RE: causes of action against Epstein | Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-110 | 10/23/09
3:43 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] Adler to Scott Rothstein
(25997) | p. 73 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|----------|-----------|-------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 25997 | 10/23/09 | Scott | | | | +| | | Rothstein | Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | ON | rivilege Log | +|--------|--------------------|---------|----------|---|----|--------------| +| 13-111 | 10/25/09 3:21 p.m. | | | | | p. 67 | +| | | (25937) | | a | | | + +| | | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 201 | IVII.E7 LOG | +|-------|----------|-------|--------------------------|----------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Objection | +| 25937 | 10/25/09 | Scott | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne AGEp I h | W/P; Attorney Client | + +| | EPS | MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | +|--------|-------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege | +| 13-113 | 10 /iciS7 e | | | + +| Date | To | From | Description Objection | +|----------|---------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1./27/09 | Phaedra | | | +| | Xanthos | Ken Jenne | Political Work product; Contributions/ad attorney/client privilege; vertisement for irrelevant and not reasonably the rental on calculated to lead to the Little St. James discovery of the admissible Island evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5, 2018, CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 13-116 | 10/29/09
7:44 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Paul Cassell to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | p. 129 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------|--------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07019-07024 | 10/29/09 | [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | L.M. and E.W. v. Epstein – I'm on it | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights. | + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +f + +a L. Ackerman, Jr. + +From: Sent To: Subject Gary Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:49 PM ROBERT CARNEY; Jack Scarola; Seth Lehrman; Lilly Ann Brad RE: It's time to meet L Ackerman, Jr.; + +Judge, I apologize for the delay In replying, I was out of the office most of the day yesterday, and could not get with my partners and our clients to discuss all Issues. We have now done so. We are certainly happy to meet, but maybe a conference call can accomplish the same thing. But even before that,,let me lay out a proposal acceptalilFtcjilliUtiFs. Here is what we propose...and It essentially includes the "aye, aye" you requested, with some additional provisions. + +We will agree to prepare a revised log in which we add dates for the emails and a description of the subject matter & parties. But we will also omit from the log any work product privilege objections, subject to the following agreement.(All work product materials will be turned over to PI5Intiffexcept for materials related fa (new or ongoingcases, AND on the condition that they be produced "For AttornevsrEves OM/ such that no copies Dries will be made of them, and Epstein will not see these documents, unless and until such time as Judge and/or Judge Ray has overruled any privilege claim (following your recommended report, or course). If the objections are sustained, the documents will be returned to us and no copies retained by 'plaintiff's attorneys; if the objections are overruled and the documents otherwise deemed discoverable, Plaintiff gets them. The Plaintiff and his attorneys will also agree that by entering into this agreement and producing these documents as described, Plaintiff will not take the position that we have waived any privilege. (Thus, the only items Your Honor will have to review and make privilege determinations would be as (to work product materials for existing cases, and attorney/client privilege materials. + +We should note at this point that many of the objections we have raised in the log are in fact relevancy objections. We were forced to do so to also protect privacy rights of those note part of this case. This is due in large part to the extremely broad scope of documents produced by the Trustee. Many of these emails Involve very personal matters or highly personal issues Involving staff at RRA withs3 possible relevance to the case. We can eliminate them from the log, and argue relevance Issues to Judge M, which will speed things up, but only if the Plaintiff will agree to a confidentiality order to protect privacy rights. We simply cannot waive the privacy of these people, and we had no idea that such items would be Included in the Trustee's production when we previously appeared before Judge Ray. If the Plaintiff feels that such a document is relevant to his case he can seek relief from the confidentiality order. + +Regarding Judge MI, given his rukihis week in which he clearly indicated that while he will not Interfere with Judge Ray but that he (Judge will be the sole and final arbiter of discover in the case before him, including issues of. privilege and relevance, we believe it prudent to enter an agreed order appointing Judge Carne as special In the state case, too. That way this whole process need not be repeated by another and no further time is wasted. + +We believe we can get the revised and limited privilege log (limited to only attorney/client privilege matters, as our clients will not waive same and will not agree to the attorneys' eyes only limitation) within 7-10 days. But that should not slow the process at all at this point, since Judge Carney still needs to review all the remaining privilege claims and that will take significant time. While we are preparing the revised log, Judge + +Carney can begin his review of the privileged documents. We will then produce the revised log and the plaIntiffs counsel can then raise any objections they have, and we can have one hearing before Judge Carney on all issues before he enters his recommended order to Judge Ray. + +n + +Finally, with regard to your reviewJudge, we think that it will be an extreme Inconvenience to our firm to have to sit with you for a week or a few days while you conduct the in camera inspection. Instead, we propose that we submit a list to you in which we identify as many people as possible whose Identities or connection to the privilege claims may not be apparent, to aid you in your review. We can make ourselves available by phone if someone else comes up, or for other questions. Alternatively, you could put questioned Items in a pile and then call both sides in for any questions you have about that pile. This would greatly reduce the amount of time the attorneys have to spend sitting around while Your Honor conducts the review. While Plaintiffs counsel is being paid by the hour in this case, we are not and we can put the time spent sitting while Your Honor reviews to much more productive use. Moreover, if Plaintiff agrees to the proposal above for work product, the universe of documents in which Your Honor, needs guidance should be significantly reduced. I14/ ..) • + +I truly believe this to be a fair compromise that allows the process to procee le we revise the log, and preserves all arguments for both sides. Please advise if this is accep to y le. hank you. + +Gary M. Jr., Esq. + +Civil Justice Attorney + +Jaffe, Weissing, + +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +'Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +(954) 524-2820 + +(954) 524-2822 fax + +(954) 648-3903 cell + +hathtoiustice.com + +Save a Tree I Please consider the 1 nment before printing this e-mail. + +NOTICE:THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL IT iS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE COLLECT AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. + +From: ROBERT CARNEY [mallto:rbcamey3@gmall.com] + +Sent: Tu bruary 01, 2011 7:54 AM + +To: Gary Jack Scarola; Seth Lehrman; Lilly Ann I= L Ackerman Jr.; Brad + +Subject: is me to meet + +ONow that Judge has ruled, it is time to get down to business. According to Judge Ray's Order, the privilege log was due by the 3161, and we now have thirty days. We can debate whether the current log is in compliance with the rules or not, but the fact remains, in its present format there is no way that the Plaintiff can cull thin the list and eliminate those documents for which it has no into is creates a problem. Unfortunately, it is far more of an attorney problem than it is a Special problem. I need both sides + +present When I make'my inspection because I are going to have to have input on who is who. Because the log r --'Cannot first be tuned by the Plaintiff in its present form, this is going to be a laborious and very time consuming process, so we need to block off appropriate time now, I don't think that a full week is out ofline:Judge Ray's Order gives this phase one month.. + +I see this playing out as follows: + +- 1.. tReview of documents where privilege is claimed to see if there is any.facialleason for that claim. This means both sides being present as I go than. all 17,000 documents. Many docuinents are sent to third parties. Whether this waives the privilege depends on who the third party is and how he or she fits into the case. Where there is ne privilege, the documents-would be earmarked frit release to the Plaintiff The Plaintiff, as ntly as one of Joe's last e ontinueS under the belief that I am assisting the Defendant in preparin g. I am not. I aim the neutral ruling on log. As such, I ant not going to work with the Defendant bides are present or neither side: is present during the review. +- 2. 2. After that process, for those documents where there legitimately is a privild -hearing would be conducted to see if the privilege has been abrogated in any way; +- 3. aPreparation of a Special Report toIudge Ray outlining my + +Had the Defendant prepared a log in compliance with Tig, we een able to shorten this process. Whether there has been an appropriate privilege log and wh if any; should be imposed if there has not, can bc addressed as we proceed, but we are under a /of, 6 ukinth e limitation as of now. We need to-meet ( —Nor conference not later than Wednesday as I indicated in my laspemail. If anyone has a better idea on how to L./Netted, I am all dars,but I am not looking to extendiht: Order. We have one month, and in the absence of complete agreement by both sides, I am-not watte the requirement that both sides be present as 'I review the documents. Gs' + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +MI L. Ackerman, Jr. + +--7rom: Gary + +Sent: Wednesday, Feb1712011 4:27 PM + +To: ROBERT CARNEY; L. Ackerman Jr.; Lilly Ann Jack Scant; + +E. KNIGHT; Seth Lehrman; Brad + +Subject RE: Suggestion + +Hello all. I wanted to provide and update, and get written confirmation from the Plaintiffs counsel of the deal that was verbally agreed to on Friday and put into an email by me on Monday. I have not received any reply to my Monday email. I will resend it after this. + +But by way of update I can tell you that we have four (4) boxes of documents that are ready to be turned over now (or when we get them back from a copy center that is scanning them) under the agreement. To be specific, we have 2 boxes of documents that contain materials that we believe to be irrelevant but that Implicate privacy rights of the parties or non-parties (mostly staff at the old RRA). These will be turned over subject to a confidentiality order (and that needs to be drafted, BTW), such that Plaintiff & his counsel can immediately begin reviewing same. We—alio- OW? (more boxes that contain work product materials that we will turn over subject to the agreement that Plaintiff will not (assert that any privilege has been waived by turningthem over now, and further subject to the agreement that they be riaidtWd-"FcAttorr ei' Eyes Onls7rj Should Plaintiff or his attorneys believe that a document is not confidential or l eged, that objection will be brought before Judge Carney and he will issue a recommended order to both Judges and Ray. + +We have also completed what I would estimate to be 1/5 of the revised privilege log, and are prepared to make those ocuments available Immediately for Judge Camey to begin reviewing, and we will produce that portion of the privilege og to Plaintiff as well. We estimate that the privilege will be completed by Tuesday, perhaps earlier, but are also agreeable to a rolling production of revised log to PI i and documents for review by Judge Carney, subject to the agreement. + +Judge, I know that you are anxious to begirCte re and I have spoken with Brad and he Just had a trial in which he was supposed to start Monday get continued. he would be available to sit with you and go through the privileged items this coming Monday & Tuesday here in our office. In fact, as the log progresses we will have a constant flow of documents for you & he to review, such that you may be able to finish the review next week. + +We are attempting to move this forward as quickly as possible, and once we get written confirmation of the Agreement and draft the Confidentiality Order, Plaintiff can have at review of the 4 boxes immediately. I would also remind everyone that these 4 boxes are in addition to the 3 boxes of over 8,000 documents already produced for which our objection was withdrawn. + +Thanks. Gary + +Gary M. , Jr., Esq. + +Civil Jus ice Attorney + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos 8 Lehrman, P.L. + +Or Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +c ort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +<954) 524-2820 + +(954) 524-2822 fax + +Save a Treel iipt Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. + +110110E: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE COLLECT AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. + +From: ROBERT CARNEY [mallto:rbcamey3@gmall.corn] + +Sent: Fr ay, February 04, 2011 4:311, + +To: Ackerman Jr.; Lilly Ann Jack Scarola; Bra E. KNIGHT; Gary Seth Lehrman; + +Subject: Suggestion + +I have another suggestion for you all to ponder over the weekend. I am assuming by now that all have read Judge Order. Translated into plain English, he is saying 'I don't care what you all do in bankruptcy court. I am only bound by it if I agree with it.' This puts everyone in a precarious position. Epstein's riAbs only come from his state court subpoena, and what he puts in evidence in state court is controlled by Judge =. not by Judge Ray. Remember, Judge Ray has no interest in the outcome of the state court litigation, no interest in what gets put into evidence in state court, and no interest in whether Epstein gets to look at the documents. He is only looking to protect the trustee. + +;We can be wasting a huge amount of time and money if the state court does not like what Judge Ray does. And the Plaintiff is not really going to be able to circumvent an adverse order by Judge by waiving Judge Ray's Order at him. + +So here is my suggestion. ave made this before and will do it a th sides request a stay from Judge Ray with a request to let Judge = rule on this. It is, after all, Jude case, and it is state rules and state law that applies. And Epstein only gets intotdence what Jud e says he can put in evidence. If Judge Ray agrees with transferring the Special= status to state court and Judge = approves, the Report would go 12.1pige Ell, and he could sign off oDALLior not. Objections to the report, if any, would be heard by Judge = and not Judge Ray. Since Judge = is the final arbiter, I can't sec any reason not to let him decide in the first place. The very real potential of conflicting orders is eliminated as is the potential for duplication of time and effort with two different judges on the same issue. + +I have said all along that this is a state court issue, and it is clear now that Judge agrees with that. So let it be resolved by the state court. + +I challenge either side to show any downside to this suggestion. And I challenge either side to show why there isn't a huge downside in terms of time, money, and the potential of conflicting orders by continuing as we arc. + +Both sides would have to agree, but in light of Judge Order, I cannot see any reason why both sides are not already suggesting this. + +1 + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +COPY + +MEETING HELD BEFORE SPECIAL [REDACTED] R ROBERT CARNEY + +IN RE: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL +CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +DATE TAKEN: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 +TIME: 10:05 AM - 11:15 AM +PLACE: SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Lee Lynott, Registered Merit Reporter +Registered Professional Reporter +Certified Shorthand Reporter +Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 SE 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 + +1 2 • to -- Let me see if we can cut quickly to the chase here. + +3 4 5 6 The confidentiality, can we get the confidentiality worked out so that we get something in writing so everyone is happy, in writing by next Friday at the latest? + +7 MR. ACKERMAN: That will be fine. + +9 10 11 MRS. : The documents are go. Write up whatever you want and we'll -- we have a problem with that. + +12 13 14. MR. You guys ave 19,000 confidentiality orders other cases and you get paid by the hour to + +15 16 17 MRS. t have a problem, but we will get an order y tomorrow and you can get the document y Friday, and that's done. + +18 19 20, 21 MR. : (Do you still want to do the) (atto rev's-eyes ev's-eyes only?) (Do you want to speed it up or) ou'll get work-product stuff if you agree to the) orriev's-eyes only) + +22, MRS. : Yes. + +23 MR. KNIGHT: We need to get the ball rolling. + +24 , MR. ACKERMAN: Let's do that. + +25' MRS. : Yes. + +MR. : How about this Friday? + +• + +# EXHIBIT E + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +REF\_SETTLEMENT,WM + +### U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM + +Doe v. United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon (Settlement) Case in other court: USCA, 13-12923-C USCA, 13-12926-C USCA, 13-12928-C Cause: no cause specified + +### Petitioner + +Jane Doe represented by affe Weissing Fistos tunes hrman PL N Andrews Avenue Suite2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Email: bradtpathtojustice.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NO77CED + +V. + +### Respondent + +Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil ghts: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Go ent Defendant ,S e + +CO + +Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Email: jay®jayhowell.com PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +Paul G. Cassell Email: cassellp®law.utah.edu PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +| | | Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 30
Response/Reply (Other), Response/Reply (Other) filed by Jane Doe. Error -
Wrong Event Selected ; Correction - Redocketed by Clerk as Reply to
Response to Motion. Instruction to Filer - In the future, please select the proper
event. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 10/17/2008) | +|-------------------|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 12/05/2008 | 33 | Sealed Document. (rb) (Entered: 12/05/2008) | +| 12/05/2008 | | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 32 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj)
(Entered: 11/03/2010) | +| 12/09/2008 | 34 | Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 33 Sealed Document. Error(s): Sealed
Document Filed in Wrong Case; Correction - Original document restricted and
refiled in correct case. (rb) (Entered: 12/09/2008) | +| 12/22/2008 | 35 | AFFIDAVIT signed by : A. [REDACTED] Villafana. re 14 Affidavit, 13
Response/Reply (Other) Supplemental Declaration by United States of
America. (Attachments: # 1 Certification Certificate of Service)(Villafana, Ann
[REDACTED]) (Entered: 12/22/2008) | +| 02/12/2009 | 36 | ORDER denying 28 Motion to Unseal Document. Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 2/12/2009. (ir) (Entered: 02/12/2009) | +| 04/09/2009 | (37) | NOTICE by Jane Doe of Change of Firm Affiliation (Edwards, Bradley)
(Entered: 04/09/2009) | +| 09/08/2010 | 38 | Administrative Order Closing Case. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
9/8/2010. (tb) (Entered: 09/09/2010) | +| 09/13/2010 | (39) | NOTICE by Jane Doe re 38 Administrative Order In Response to
Administrative Order Closing Case ([REDACTED], Bradley) (Entered: 09/13/2010) | +| 10/12/2010 | 40 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for lack of prosecution. Show Cause Response
due by 10/27/2010. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 10/8/2010. (ir)
(Entered: 10/12/2010) | +| 10/27/2010 | 41 | STATUS REPORT by Jane Doe ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]) Modified to add missing
event 42 Response to Order to Show Cause on 10/28/2010 (ls). (Entered:
10/27/2010) | +| 10/27/2010 | 42 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe. (ls)(See Image at
DE # 41 ) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 10/28/2010 | 43 | Clerks Notice to Filer re 41 Status Report. Two or More Document Events
Filed as One ; ERROR - Only one event was selected by the Filer but more
than one event was applicable to the document filed. The docket entry was
corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but in the
future, the Filer must select all applicable events. (ls) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 10/28/2010 | 44 | ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
10/28/2010. (ir) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 12/17/2010 | 45 | STATUS REPORT by United States of America (Villafana, Ann [REDACTED])
(Entered: 12/17/2010) | + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +FILED +FILED +2023 MAY - 8 PM 4:02 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM +DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS** + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant Bradley [REDACTED] and for Sanctions in the above-styled case. This Court having reviewed the Motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: The Defendant + +Bradley Edwards shall within 30 +days of the date of this order file +a more complete privilege log. The Court +finds the privilege log is insufficient on its +face and does not comply with the requirements +of F.R.C.P. 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp v. +Johnson, 799 Suzd 339 (Fla 4th DCA 2001). In + +Epstein v. Rothstein and [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMB/Division AG +Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions +Page 2 of 2 + +all other respects the Motion is denied at this +time +**DONE AND ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida +this 7th day of April, 2012. + +*May* + +![]()Copies furnished to: + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 32401 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] Esq. +The L•S Law Firm +Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor +1441 Brickell Avenue +Miami, FL 33131 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE . FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 5.02009CA0408060qCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTE J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +. .. , Ac + +e)rza mccigl izey 1-1 c) in• "ttrn mit CO •• 0 rn -TT D3 \*CI + +### ORDER ON OUSTANDING DISCOVERY OTIONS + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considAd "'August 3, 2012, on outstanding discovery motions, and the Court having ryvt e file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGEtthatt WARDS' Motion for Clarification is GRANTED, ,/ek . s and this Court's Order of May.7, 7, ,12 is vacated without prejudice. shall file a written response specif catty addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of EPSTEIN's Motion to Comp April 10, previonaprod ced, shall be accompanied by all non-privileged responsive documents not previously produced, if any, and shall identify, in a proper privilege log as referenced in this Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege. This response shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this Order. and mend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's er. The response shall identify non-privileged responsive documents + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 17th +day of Aug, 2012. + +[Signature] +DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +NOT A CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +brad@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esquire +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com +The L-S Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305)-503-5503 +Fax: (305)-503-6801 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flab.uscourts•S0v + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, + +Debtor. + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +CHAPTER II + +PRIVILEGE LOG + +MI, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN + +Dated: February 23, 2011 + +Total of 159 pages + +# rivile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissi Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 08076-08089 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez | | +| 08311-08318 | 05/26/2009 | Katherine Ezell | WPB-Confidential-General | | +| 08319-08324 | 10/16/2009 | Amy Ederi | WPB-General-Confidential | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08398 | 09/01/2009 | Kikka Claudio | C.M.A. vs. | Epstein, et | +| 08402 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | Report this as aparole violation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08415 | 09/16/2009 | | | | +| | | Margaret Berk | Scanned document | from | +| 08422 | 08/11/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Subpoena " -directed | to the | +| 10060 | 08/03/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein-Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10069-10074 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Transcript | of Alfredo | +| 10077-10079 | 08/06/2009 | Mercedes Estrada | RE:Epstein vs. Jane Doe No.101 | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10099-10102 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10192 | 08/11/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Trump Depo moved 08/18 to | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10194-10195 | 08/11/2009 Jacquie Johnson | Kikka Claudio | FW: Out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10264-10266 | 08/09/2009 AdahHorowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Letter | regarding | + +Jaffe W issi Fistos & Lehrma + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------| +| 10279-10291 08/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE: Epstein-Notice of production | | +| | | | | Joint w/e P | +| 10372-10373 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | rek lolnWP e | +| | | | | L- 2 | +| 10490-10493 | 09/21/2009 | Amy Fried | FW: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10592-10593 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10604-10620 | 10/01/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:meeting w/T-fr | rter Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10639-10643 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart Mermeistein | Meeting w/LeslIe Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10700-10702 | 10/13/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10724-1073 | 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz | Joint w/P Priv. | +| 10897 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart Me:mei:dein , Leslie Wexner | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10992-11005 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint w/p Priv. | +| 11011-11021 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11026-11032 | 07/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | commissioner | +| 11072-11074 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Possible witness | from | +| 11166-11169 | 06/23/2009 Katherine Ezell | | RE:Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Len tma n + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|--------------|------------------------|-----------------|----------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------| +| 11240-11245 | 06/22/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11248-11250 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | | Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11255-11259 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | USAO Chose | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 11269-11281 06/30/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | | RE:Epstein | Depo;possible | +| 711316-11319 | 06/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Discussion | about possible | +| 11332-11336 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | FW:Transcript | of Alfrefo | +| | 11340-11341 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | | | RE:Epstein vsiane Doe No.101 & | +| 11348-11358 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | REMotion | for protective | +| 11430-11434 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Edwards | Discussion | RE:Wexner | +| 11443 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | =Edwards | Wexner served subpoena | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11541-11542 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Bradley | RE:Leslie Wexner & Bob | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11551-11559 | 10/01/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Meeting wStanely Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11585-11586 | 10/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | | | +| | | | | RE:Epstein;Larry | Visoski | +| | | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11675.11676 | 10/29/2009 | | | | | +| | | | | RE:Leslie Wexner attorney info | Joint W/P Priv. | + +### Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 15981-15988 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Attachment:Kellen & Trump | +| 15999-16007 | 08/05/2009 | Bert Patton | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo-New York Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16057-16065 | 08/06/2009 | Mercedes | Jacquie | Trump and Maxwell Dep dates- Joint w/P Priv. | +| 15918.15949 | 08/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo's 08/14,17,18 in | +| 16066-16069 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trump, Wexner convo | +| 16095-16098 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trumo,Wexner Convo | +| 15813-15814 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | | Wexler lawyer's info Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15856 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Epstein 0epo-NY;2 Attachments Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15866-15881 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | 1 ,rs | +| | | | | PDF of | +| 15893-15901 08/03/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie Johnson | Depo &subpoena notice for | +| 15360-15363 | 09/01/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Alan Dershowitz;Harvard Law | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15394-15397 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein-Deposof Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15413.15428 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Esptein-Notice of Prodcution | +| 15434-15437 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | Notice Of Production from Non | + +### Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011 + +# Jane, weissing, ristos rsi Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 15454-15475 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Critton's notice of depo;Epstein | | +| 01465 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Epstein | Joint VP Priv. | +| 15485-15492 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15493-15500 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | RE:Deposition | of 4ean Luc | +| 15501-15555 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1555645564 | 09/22/2009 | Jacquie | Margaret Berk | Epstein ()epos Y | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15565-15575 | 09/25/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa | FW:Deposition | of Jean Luc | +| 15687-15688 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa | Depo of David Hart Rogers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15692-15707 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Sranley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15708-15709 | 10/06/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes Estrada | | | +| | | | \43/ 34/ ts | | | +| 15033-15032 | 08/05/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15087-15093 | 08/06/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15094-15100 | 08/06/2009 | Jacqule Johnson | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15109-15112 | 08/10/2009 | Jacqute | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Depositions for | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer,Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards.Fistos &Lehrman + +| MI | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION, | +|------------------------|-------------|---------------|----------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 15122-15125 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE: Ms. Maxwell | Depo | +| | | | | | Joint INS | +| 15142-15158 | 08/11/2209 | | Kikka Claudio | FW:out of state subpoenas | Joid Priv. | +| 15166-15170 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1.5171-15172 | 08/11/ 2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15178-15182 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Kilcka Claudio | RE:Epstein | V I | +| 15306-15355 | 08/25/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | FW:Epstein Depo Notices & Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14951-14952 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14954-14972 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Depo of Mark Epstein | | +| 14979-14981 08/03/2009 | | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14983-15015 | 08/04/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein De | 8/14.17, | +| 16501-16519 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16520-16547 | 09/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Deposition | of Jane | +| 16355-16384 | 08/24/2009 | Adam HorovAtz | Jacquie | Epstein Depo Notices and Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16554.16568 | 09/16/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +### Privilege Log— -23-2011 + +### Jaffe, Weissing. i Pistos ist Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 16574-16577 | 09/17/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | | +| 16396-16398 | 09/01/2009 | Margaret | lacquie | Alan Dershowitz | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16578-16581 09/17/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Depo | | +| 1658246585 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:DepositIon of | le L | +| 16585-16611 09/18/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16612-16439 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Pep, | Epstein Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16440 | 08/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Steam | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16740-16753 | 09/22/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1644346452 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie Johnson | RE:E steln-De s of | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16777-16786 | 09/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16793-16794 | 10/01/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Depo of David Hart Rogers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16462-16477 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notke of Production | | +| 16802-16823 | 10/02/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16483-16486 | 09/10/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| | | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer. Jaffe. Weissing,Edwards. Fistos &Lehrman + +| | | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | _ OBJECTION _DATE | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------------------------|----------------------| +| 16874-16880 | 10/13/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquia | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16904.16905 | 10/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | JacqtTa | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16945 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 17033-17034 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquia | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02065-02068 | 06/08/2009 | aa | Mercedes | FW:Epstein-Confirming | AT&T | +| 02070 | 09/02/2009 | Jacquiea | Spencer Kuvin | | | +| 02071 | 08/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquiea | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Stems | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02072-02078 09/04/2009 | | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | 11.0 8,eis | o of Joint W/P Priv. | +| 03466-03468 | 05/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | I | REActvity in Case | 9:08-cv | +| 02301-02302 | 09/09/2009 | Paul Cassel | | FW:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 03122-03123 | 06/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley | FW: Motion to Dismiss | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02805-02806 | 05/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Katherine Ezell | RE:WPB-Confidential-Genereal | | +| 02670-02671 10/21/2009 | | Bradley Edwards | Spencer Kuvin | FWSubpoena Info | Joint W/P My. | +| 02517-02519 | 10/02/2009 | Bradley | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | + +### Priv I e Lo —Dated 2-23-2011 + +# \_,,Jaffe, Weissint Fistes &Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02614-02617 | 08/05/2009 | Kikka Claudio | FW:Proposal Request | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15702-15704 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15581-15585 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Ederi | FW:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15431-15433 | 09/10/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| 15797-15798 | 10/14/2009 Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11560-11562 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine | Jacquie FW:Meetingsv/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11444-11448 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Eden | FW:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05823 | 09/04/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05832 | 09/08/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05838 | 09/08/2009 Jacquie | Jack | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05847 | 09/09/2009 Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05859 | 07/23/2009 | Edwards Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05863-05864 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Dell | 1 RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05886-05887 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | | Jane, weissma | rings a | terwman | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------| +| | DATE | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +| 05902-05903 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05906-05907 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint WiP Priv. | +| 05912 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Arvin | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05928-05930 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05933-05934 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | | +| | | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05936 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05938 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | | +| | | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05940-05941 09/18/2009 | | Spencer Arvin | e RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05951 | 05/29/2009 | Spencer K | ' RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05957-05960 | 09/09/2009 | Kildckga | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05970-05971 10/21/2009 | Jacqule | MAlaret, | ric RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05982-05983 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05993-05994 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05997 | 08/06/2009 | !Mks Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jane, weissma rings a terwman + +Jane. weissing, aristos & tenrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01029 | 10/08/2009 | Carolyn | Brian Ryalls | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07707 | 09/03/2009 BradleyEdwards | Mica Claudio | RE:Regarding:CMA. vs. Epstein. | | +| 07708.07709 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07734 | 07/24/2009 | | RE:Release | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07218-07219 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06861-06863 | 05/12/2009 | Katherine Ezell | REJane Doe 11 v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06876-06879 | 05/12/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | REJane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06891-06897 | 05/12/2009 | !Catherine EzeU | REJane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Prtv. | +| 06901 | 09/11/2009 | Mercedes | Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06902 | 09/15/2009 | Mercedes | Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06903 | 09/04/2009 | Mercedes | RE: Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06806-06807 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06712 | 10/19/2009 Bradley Edwards | Kikka Claudio | RE: Igor Zinoview depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06713-06714 | 09/15/2009 | Robert Josefberg | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Privileee Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +ehr an + +| | | DATE | TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------|--------|----------------|-----------|----------|-------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------------------|------------|------------|------| +| 06720 | -06727 | 10/14/2009 | Bradlee | | Jack | RE: | Igor Zinoview | depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06728 | | 09/09/2009 | | e | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06711 | | 09/09/2009 | takka | Claudio | ea | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06472 | | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | e | RE:FYi | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06460 | -06464 | 05/08/2009 | ea | | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06455 | -06459 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | es | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06448 | -06452 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06420 | -06427 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | Me | RE:FYI | ES | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06416 | -06419 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | Edwards | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05925 | -05926 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine | Ezell | Bradley Edwards | FW:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05883 | -05584 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine | Ezeli | | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05022 | -05025 | 09/10/2010 | 1 Adam | Horowitz | Jaccluie | RE:Epstein | | -Notice of Production | | | | +| | | | | | | from | Non Parties | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 04724 | -04725 | 05/27/2009 | Bradley | Edwards | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | | Cases -depostions | in | | | +| | | | | | | federal | cases | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| | | DATE | iO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | +| 06990 | -07002 | 0 6 / 1 1/2009 | Brad | | Katherine W Ezell | June | 10 | th hearing | -WPB  | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | -privilege | | +| 07003 | -07006 | 06/26/2009 | Amy | Edell | Brad | June | 25 | th hearing | -WPB Joint | -privilege | | + +# Pith/Ileke Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +# Jaffe, Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | | | Confidential | | +| 07030 | 09/22/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | L.M. v. Epstein – defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein's response to
plantiff | Joint-privilege | +| 07090-07091 | 9/29/2009 | ██████████ | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07092 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart
Mermelstein | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07093 | 09/17/2009 | ██████████ | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01484 | 05/21/2009 | Robert
Josefsberg | C. ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01503 | 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01517 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz;
Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01514 | 08/26/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01515 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01477 | 07/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz;
Stuart
Mermelstein | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01489 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07110-07112 | 09/25/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | | +| 07113-07114 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07115-07116 | 09/25/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07145-07146 | 09/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07211-07213 | 10/01/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07210 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart
Mermelstein;
Robert
Josefsberg; | C. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer.Jaffe.Weissing,Edwards. Mins&LehrmaD + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 07214-07215 | 10/01/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | C. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07216-07217 | 10/02/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07220-07223 | 10/01/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07224-07225 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07226-07227 | 10/01/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | C. Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07228-07229 | 10/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Robert Josefsberg | C. Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07280-07283 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Motion for protective order | Joint-privilege | +| 07633-07634 | 08/06/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 07710-07733 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Regularly Monthly Cong. Call | Joint-privilege | +| 07740-07746 | 09/18/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 07748-07757 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 07913-07915 | 08/27/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] | Joint-privilege | +| 07917-07918 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Joint-privilege | +| 07965-07966 | 08/12/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Subpoena directed to the investigators | Joint-privilege | +| 07977-07978 | 10/09/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 01716 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Elizabeth Villar | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations INVOICE | Joint-privilege | +| 01768 | 07/13/2009 | Richard Willits | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01771-01772 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01931 | 08/11/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Lisa | Alfredo Rodriguez | Joint-privilege | + +... a i . \_ • Jane. weissine. rstos & Lennnart + +| | DATE | TO | | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------|---------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| 01998.01999 | 09/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Margaret Berk | Correct Number — Epstein | +| 02021 | 05/14/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02044 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine W. | | | +| | | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — | +| | 09/04/2009 | Robert C. | Joint-privilege 02048 | | +| | | | BradleyJ. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein - | +| 02054 | 05/12/2009 1 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley1. | Emailing Epstein deposition | +| 02062 | 10/05/2009 | J. | Amy Ederi | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| | | | | In Tel. Conf. for Monday, | +| 02087 | 09/17/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | A | Epstein- Hearing Joint-privilege | +| 02140 | 08/04/2009 | S,enter Kuvin | BradleyJ. | Epstein Depo — New York Joint-privilege | +| 02147-02149 | 09/21/2009 | J. | Amy Ederi | Epstein Depo Joint-privilege | +| 02174 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | BradleyJ. | Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of | +| 02209-02210 | 07/01/2009 | Bert Patton | William J. Berger | Epstein v. State of Florida — | +| 02215.02217 | 07/24/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02290 | 09/18/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02355-02356 | 06/10/2009 | Mercedes C. | Susan K. Stirling | Hearing taken on 06/10/09 | +| 02362-02363 | 06/09/2009 | Kuvin | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege | +| | 09/15/2009 | Jack | .I. | Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege | + +**Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011** + +**J. Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02420-02421 | 05/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Mercedes | C. Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02435 | 09/15/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Lisa | Jane Does v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02438 | 09/18/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DC# W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 02462 | 09/22/09 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | L.M. v. Epstein - Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plantiff L.M.'s Motion for Protective Order | Joint-privilege | +| 02476-02477 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | LM v EPSTEIN hearing | Joint-privilege | +| 02516 | 10/06/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02554-02559 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | NEW ASSIGNMENT - NEW ALBANY - RUSH? - Fwd: Federal Subpoena | Joint-privilege | +| 02584 | 08/11/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Out of state subpoenas | Joint-privilege | +| 02618 | 08/04/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 02627-02628 | 09/18/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 02672-02673 | 10/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 02727 | 08/03/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 02896 | 06/08/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 03009-03010 | 08/07/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Motion to stay | Joint-privilege | +| 03028-03029 | 09/21/2009 | Bradley Edwards | J. Adam Horowitz | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 03038 | 10/06/2009 | Bradley Edwards | J. Stuart Mermelstein | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 03131-03132 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | Epsteins assets | Joint-privilege | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer. Jaffe, Weissin Edwards.Fistos&Leh n + +| | DATE TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------------|---------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 03243-03244 | 09/09/2009 1 | J. | Adam Horowitz | EPSTEIN Joint-privilege | +| 03397-03400 | 09/29/2009 Adam Horowitz | | .I. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | +| 03407-03414 | 09/29/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | +| 03451-03452 | 05/14/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893- | +| 03477-03479 | 05/15/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893- | +| 03619-03627 | 09/15/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | BB v. Epsteln/EW v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 03631-03633 | 09/15/2009 | la • tile | William J. Berger | BB v.12E_tein/EW v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 03646-03656 | 10/19/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | BIM M Subpoena & Depo | +| 03677-03687 | 07/08/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Can you send me those | +| 03719-03736 | 09/04/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | CMA — depo notices attached. Joint-privilege | +| 03840-03847 | 08/02/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | J. | Continuing Deposition of Alfredo | +| 03938-03939 | 09/29/2011 | Katherine W. | | | +| | | | J. | Deposition of Bill Joint-privilege | +| 03943-03945 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | | +| 02911-02912 | 09/15/2009 | J. | | Joint-privilege | +| 02939 | 07/14/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jane Does 2-7 v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02977 | 10/16/2009 | Katherine W. | El | Leslie Wexner Joint-privilege | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer.Jaffe. Weissing.Edwards.Fistos& Lehrman + +| M | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | , OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|---------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------| +| 02978 | 10/29/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelstein | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02994 | 06/10/2009 | | | | | +| | | | 1 ag | | | +| | | | es | C Preservation of evidence | Joint-privilege | +| 07060 | 10/16/2009 | Sid | | | | +| | | | Bradley .1 | LM. v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| | | | Bradley). | Scheduling various depositions | | +| 06202 | 07/13/2009 | | | | Joint-privilege | +| 06409-06415 | 04/15/2009 | | 1 Katherine W. Ezell | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06428-06447 | 05/06/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06453-06454 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI | Joint-privilege , | +| 06465-06471 04/15/2009 | | Katherine | W. | | | +| | | | Bradley). | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06476-06490 | 05/08/2009 | | J. Spencer Kuvin | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06630-06632 | 09/09/2009 | S encer Kuvin | J. | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06636-06639 | 09/09/2009 | | 1 Robert | C. | | +| | | | | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06702-06705 | 09/16/2009 | | J. Kiklca M. Claudio | Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola | | +| 06706-06708 | 10/14/2009 | | J. Kildo M. Claudio | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06715-06719 | 10/09/2009 | Jack P. | Braille | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06729-06735 | 10/13/2009 | | 17 lack P. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06763 | 08/19/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelstein | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06764.06766 | 09/10/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelsteln | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06770-06781 09/10/2009 | | Stuart | | | | +| | | | J. | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06811-06812 | 08/20/2009 | Katherine | W. Bradley). | Is Mark Epstein JE's brother? | Joint-privilege | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------| +| 06817-06819 | 09/23/2009 | Adam Horowitz | =J. | Is your client being deposed | | +| 06820-06822 | 07/02/2009 | J. | Margaret Berk | Jane Doe 2 IM | v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 06841.06860 | 05/12/2009 | L | Spencer Kuvin | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Int-privilege | +| 06864-06875 | 05/12/2009 | S ncer Kuvin | J. | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06880-06890 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Jane Doe 0 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06898-06900 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermeistein | Jane Doe II v. Epstein,- | Joint-privilege | +| 06933-06934 | 07/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | lane Does 2-7 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06937-06938 | 10/05/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Jane Does 2-8 v. Epstein — Cross | | +| 06944-06952 | 09/22/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DC# W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 16107 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 16123-16124 | 08/11/2009 | Oka M. Claudio | Jacquie | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| | 16799-16801 10/02/2009 | Robert C. | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 02947-02948 | 08/03/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Epstein Depo — New York | Joint-privilege | +| 02891-20906 | 10/01/2009 | 1. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 20880-20882 | 10/02/2009 | | 1. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 06042-06090 | 07/02/2009 | William 1. Berger | Spencer Kuvin | Ew 09-22784 cert.4i4 | do Joint-privilege | +| 06402-06403 | 06/10/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 01365-01366 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint-privilege | +| | 01340-01341 07/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | la - tile | Epstein Depositions | Joint-privilege | +| 01331 | 06/30/2009 | Stuart | E | Epstein depositions | Joint-privilege | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +IM, Jaffe. Weissing. IIIIIMIJMg re Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|------------------|----|--------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01319 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01316 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01314 | 10/30/2009 | Stuart | | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | | Epstein Depo of Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01298 | 05/26/2009 | | J. Adam Horowitz | | Epstein cases — depositions in | | +| 01294 | 08/10/2009 | Jack P. | J. | | Epstein Assets | Joint-privilege | +| 01273 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine | W. | | | | +| | | | Bradley J. | | Epstein 2255 claims | Joint-privilege | +| 01250 | 05/13/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01246 | 04/08/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C. | Epstein —Telephone Conference | Joint-privilege | +| 01233.01234 | 07/31/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C | Epstein — Monday, 8/3/09 — | | +| | | | | | Monthly call in telephone | | +| | | | | | (877) 468-2136 — participant | | +| 01224 | 06/16/2009 | | J. Mercedes^. | C | Epstein — Monday, 8/3/09 — | | +| | | | | | Monthly call in telephone | | +| | | | | | (877) 468-2136 — participant | | +| 01185 | 10/30/2009 | | 1. Mercedes | C. | Epstein — Confirming AT&T dial | | +| 01186 | 10/02/2009 | | 1. Mercedes | C | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | | in Tel. Conf. for Monday, | | +| 01187 | 05/19/2009 | | 1 Mercedes | C | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | | in Telephone Conference for | | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jane, weissing, towarcis, ristos a MUIR-TIM] + +| a | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 01188 | 05/12/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C. | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| 01189 | 09/08/2009 | | J. 'liana Yarzabal | | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| | | | | In Telephone | Conference for | +| | | | | Wednesda | 9/9/09 at 300 | +| 01095-01096 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | | Deposition of Epstein was set for | +| 01045 | 07/23/2009 | | J. Richard Willits | CMA vs. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01649 | 07/08/2009 | | J. Me des | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01641 | 06/11/2009 | I | | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01639 | 05/29/2009 | | J. MEM | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01619 | 10/28/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01660 | 07/22/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01666 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ( J. | Epstein | Joint-pit/Hew | +| 01671 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine | W. | | | +| | | | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01680 | 08/24/2009 | Jack P. | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 04355-04358 | 09/04/2009 | Jack Scarola | J. | Epst in — D | s of | +| 04446 | 09/03/2009 | | J. Mane Yarzabal | Epstein — | Monday 8/3/09 - | +| | | | | Monthly | Call in Telephone | +| | 04200-04201 09/04/2009 | | Katherine W. EzeA | Letter from Bob Clifton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| | 09/04/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 0422204223 | 09/04/2009 | I I | Barry | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilep | + +# Jaffe, Weissine, Pistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------| +| 04264 | 05/12/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depo | Joint WI? Privilege | +| 04298-04299 | 09/16/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Depo of Epstein | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 04304 | 09/08/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04335 | 10/30/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Confirming AT&T Tel. | | +| 043S9.04360 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie Katherine Ezell | 's of | rdnkova & Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04365 | 09/15/2009 | la • ule Adam Horowitz | Epstein- Depo in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04417 | 09/17/2009 | I Spencer Kuvin | Epstein- Hearing_ | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04423.04424 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Letter regarding Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04433-04436 | 06/16/2009 | Spencer Kum I | Monthly Call in Tele. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04447-04450 | 07/31/2009 Ja | we Mercedes | Monthly Call in Tel. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04491-04518 | 04/08/2009 | Jack Scarola | Epstein-Tel. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04518 | 04/08/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Tel Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04524.04525 | 05/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04580 | 10/14/2009 Ja | uie Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoski | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 04640-04641 10/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoski | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04723 | 05/26/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein cases- Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04726-04729 | 05/26/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Epstein cases- Witness depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04750-04754 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein depo- New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04763-04785 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depo Notice | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04797.04799 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04806-04813 | 07/28/2009 | Jacquie Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depos in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04819 | 07/30/2009 — Jack | Jacquie | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04831-04832 | 07/ 30/2009 | Spencer Kuvin Jacquine | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04835.04836 | 07/25/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe, WeissMe. Ma FIStOS a Mormon + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|-----------------|--------------------------------|-------------------| +| 04711 | 08/10/2009 | | Jack . | Epstein assests | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04855-04858 | 08/18/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04861 | 07/24/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04876-04877 | 07/27/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04922-04923 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04925-04926 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04929-04934 | 09/25/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04937-04938 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04969-04972 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Alfredo Rodriguez Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05026-05027 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Notice of Production from Non | | +| 05031 | 09/25/2009 | | Spencer Kuehl | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05037-05038 | 09/25/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Order | 1 Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05042-05043 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05046 | 09/25/2009 | | Spener Kuvin | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05074-05076 | 08/18/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | Epstein Sub. To Bears Stem | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +# a affe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 05100-05102 | 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | | Improper Serving of Maxwell | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05105-05107 | 04/20/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Hearing on Yellow Cab Objection | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05110 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Kikka Claudio | Address for | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05118.05119 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Motion for Protective Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05157-05158 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Motion for Protective Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05167-05168 | 05/29/2009 | | Margaret Berk | Spencer Cross-Examination | | +| 05171-05172 | 05/29/2009 | | Mercedes | Transcripts | | +| 05201-05202 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Rules on Doe no. 4 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05222-05223 | 07/10/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | File case | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05226 | 07/10/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein 5th Amendment rights | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05229 | 07/10/2009 | | Adam HorowIt2 | Motions to Compel | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05232-05233 | 07/10/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Motions fully briefed | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05247 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Bradley | Answers to the 1" set of ROGS | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05251-05252 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Depo dates | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05258 | 07/25/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Switzerland Witness regarding | | +| 05265-05266 | 07/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Spencer Kuvin | Alfredo Rodriguez depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +matte, weissing. mit tistos at Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | - DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|---------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 05286.05287 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Switzerland Witness regarding | | +| 05293.05294 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Calling Switzerland witness | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05326-05327 | 08/24/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Emails searchable | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05331 | 08/06/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | Epstein address | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05334-05335 | 05/29/2009 | | Mercedes | TV Interview that is too explicit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05347 | 08/24/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking Computers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05350 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | Current address for Nadia | | +| 05353-05354 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Distribution of Costs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05367 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Edwards | Voicemail | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05373-05374 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Edwards | Supoenas for depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05391-05393 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley | Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05400-05401 10/19/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Bradley | Religious Dildo Washer | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05414-05415 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | current address | Joint w/P Priv. | +| 05437-05439 | 04/20/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05444-05445 | 08/10/2009 | -Bradley | Kikka Claudio | Setting Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05451 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Jaffe. WeissinJT. Fis os 8 Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION r--• | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------| +| 05469 | 07/08/2009 | Mercedes | Judge Marra's July 6th | Order Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05476-05494 | 07/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | NPA from | Villafana Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05546 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05579-05581 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking all of Plaintiff's | | +| 05613-05618 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Non-Pros Agreement' | | +| | | | N | / | +| 05633 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion rofreese assets | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05638-05639 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | DalialloWebs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05647 | 07/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz Katherine Ezell | NPA under seal for in camera | | +| 05656 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Supoenas for depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05659 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05668 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Florida Science Foundation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05705 | 09/09/2009 | Mercedes Kikka Claudio | Video tape of Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05724 | 05/29/2009 | Jack Scarola | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05727 | 05/29/2009 | Edwards Sid | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05730-05731 08/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacqule | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05734 | 05/29/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacquie | Motion for status conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------| +| 05737 | 08/12/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | NPNP and sub to Palm Beach | | +| 05750 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Spencer Kuvin | Motion for status conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05770 | 07/08/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | NPA in camera review | Joint WIT,Priv. | +| 05774-05776 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | being rescheduled | | +| 05782-05783 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Motion to appoint commissioner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05788-05790 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Notice and serve everyone | Joint W/P Priv, | +| 05802 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | NO being split up evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05806 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin 4,„..., | -4 | | +| 05812 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | JacquieInli | Bill will be split evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05814 | 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05818-05819 | 09/09/2009 | Edwards | Robert Josefsberg | CMA Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 01781 | 05/01/2009 | Edwards | William Berger | Epstein Depo | Work Product;attorney client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of admissible | +| 07619 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attomey client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of admissible | + +### Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE `-TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| V`Work iovrit | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03182-03185 07/14/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| 03186-03188 OS/01/2009 William Berger Epstei4, i ) Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13860-13874 05/28/2009 Elizabeth Christinia Fitch Ut \ ion Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 14173 10/21/2009 Gary Bradle Stanely Arkin Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13419 08/11/2009 Denis Kleinf Trump's Depo Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03087 06/29/2010 ve Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03088 04/11/2009 Epstein Litigation Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +### Privilege Low Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissin : Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|-------------------------------------------------|----|------------| +| Team | | | privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to | | | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03089-03099 05/03/2009 Attorneys and | | | | | | +| Adler RE: Setting De pos Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13445-13453 08/19/2009 Denis Kleinfeld litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| ) 44111fri | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 12281-12291 07/30/2009 Carl Linder Litigation Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09337-09340 08/10/2009 Barry GbeSStrategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09350 10/21/2009 Barry Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 09335 08/06/2009 Barry Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| N si | | | | | | +| 11983 08/06/2009 Ca i Jacquie Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11984-11988 08/06/2009 Carl Linder Litigation Strategy ,. Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | + +a, Jaffe. Weissing, FIStos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11995 08/19/2009 Carl Under Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 12012 10/21/20009 Carl Linder Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11879 10/21/2009 Cara Litigation St Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 11868 08/19/2009 Cara | | | | | | +| '? t. | | | | | | +| tegy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| evidence;protected by privacy rights I-10938 05/28/2009 Paul Ca | | | | | | +| ligation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| r 13592 10/21/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 04421 05/21/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| I I | | | | | | +| litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25814 05/28/2009 William Berger Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discover' | of | admissible | + +### Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 25778-25782 07/30/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25792-25797 05/28/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy L | | | | | | +| i | pm5ilege;irrelevant | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25798 08/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Strate | | | | | | +| A\ r' | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25799-25802 08/10/2009 William Berger Liti • n tegy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 10/21/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Walainion | | | | | | +| IC? ItIliv | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 25739-25740 08/11/2009 William Berge 1S , Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 17940 07/30/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehr man + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 17917-17927 08/03/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 17932-17934 05/28/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 1 7935 05/28/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 17936-17938 07/30/2009 Jonathan | | | | | | +| Ungar t | | | | | | +| ( S \ | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00014 05/01/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00015 05/04/2009 Willia Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00016 05/04/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Stratgey Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00017 05/06/2009 Ards Adler litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00018 05/06/2009 I William Better Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | + +# Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| n, | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------| +| DATE DESCRIPTION TO FROM | OBJECTION | | | | | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00019-00021 05/07/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| C ;Vork | | | | | | +| | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| `priv | | | privilege:irrelevant ilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to | | | +| | d to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00022 06/23/3009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00023 07/13/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Sk Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 07/13/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| Strategy Work | | | Product;attorneY | | client | +| lead t —00025-00029 | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 05/01/2009 Paul Ca litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00030 05/02/2009 tam Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00031 05/03/2009 Bradley Edwards Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00032 05/03/2009 | | | | | | +| William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +Jane. welssing, FISMS ik Lenrman + +# Privilege Lox— Dated 2-23-2011 + +| DATE TO DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|------------------------|--------------------------------------|----|--------------------------| +| lead | | to I, the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00033-00034 05/03/3009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00035 05/05/2009 Susan Sterling Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00036 05/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00037-00040 05/25/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| ( 7 •`•' | | | | | | +| ' Y ( X | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| | | privilege;irrelevant & | | | reasonably calculated to | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00041 07/06/2009 William Berger i | | | | | | +| ( 14/—> ") | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00042 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| | | | evidence;protected by privacy rights | | i | +| 0043 05/05 | | | | | | +| Edwards Susan Sterling Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00044 08/17/2009 Paul Cassell litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +Jane, weissme. tistos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|------------------|-----------|-----------|------------| +| 00045 05/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00046 05/01/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Li )privilege;irrelevant | | | | | | +| Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00047.00049 05/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Strat Work | | product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00050 05/05/2009 Adler Liti • n tegy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00051 05/05/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| gation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to' | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00052 05/05/2009 Adler" Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00053 05/05/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00054 05/05/2009 Bradley Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | | to | the | discovery | of | + +# Privilege Loa —Dated 2-23-2011 + +| TO FROM DESCRIPTION | ' OBJECTION | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00055 04/29/2009 william Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00056 05/05/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00057 05/05/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00058 05/05/2009 Litiga Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00059 05/05/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00060 05/05/2009 Russel ler | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00061-0064 05/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00065 05/12/2009 Bra Edwards Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00066 04/29/2009 I Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | + +Jane, weissine, i ristos at Lenrmon + +# Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011 + +# Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman + +| Si DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00067 05/12/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00068 05/12/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00069-00070 05/13/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00071 05/13/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00072 05/15/2009 Susan Steiln | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00073 05/15/2009 Russell Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00074 05/18/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00075 05/18/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 tarmer, Jane. weissing. i ristos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00076 05/18/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00077 04/04/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy L is J Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00078 05/18/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation S | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00079 05/19/2009 Rob Buschel LitigationStrategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00080 05/19/2009 Beth Willl | | | | | | +| Liti g anon Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00081-00082 05/20/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00083.00085 05/21/2009 Edwards William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00086-00087 05/25/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe. Weissin \_Fistos& Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00088 04/30/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00089 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00090 05/28/2009 William Berger Litigation Strat | | | | | | +| ( 4\ 31 | | | | | | +| Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00091 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell ic | | | | | | +| Utigat tegy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00092 05/28/2099 Rob Buschell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00093 06/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00094-00095 06/23/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| I I | | | | | | +| 00096 07/06/2009 Bradley William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. weissing. + +| DATE TO DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00097 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | , | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00098.00100 07/07/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00101 07/09/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00102-00106 07/09/2009 Paul Cassell Litigat | | | | | | +| iC A\ | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00107 07/10/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00108 07/10/2009 Paul II Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00109 07/10/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00110 07/10/2009 Bradley Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00111 07/11/2009 I William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +Fistos & Lenrman + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | _ 0BJECNON | | | | I | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------|-----------|----|------------| +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | | | | | | +| lead evidence;protected by privacy rights -I | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00112-00120 05/012009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| | t | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00121 05/12/2009 William Berger - Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00122 05/12/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00123 05/12/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| No Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead j, | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00124.00125 05/12/2009 Willie Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00126 05/22/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | Product attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00127 05/26/2009 Bra lee William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +# Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jane WeIssin: ristos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00128.00131 5/26/2009 Rob Buschel litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00132 5/21/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00133 06/23/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00134 06/03/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| Litigatirtp& Ken Jenne | Mike Fisten | Epstein Potential Witness List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01417 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Potential Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01429 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein telephone conference today | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01431 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Bradley [REDACTED] | Epstein case info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01432 | 09/15/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Pat [REDACTED] | New Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01434 | 10/19/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Evidence | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01461 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe, Weissina. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTIOtJ | OBJECTION | +|-------|-------------|------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01466 | 07/31/20009 | William Berger | Epstein Presentation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01471 | 07/18/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigation into | Epstein's | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01480 | 07/22/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Epstein Meeting | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01482 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Invettion into Epstein planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| | | | ae' | privacy rights 'S | +| 01491 | 08/10/2009 | Ken Jenne | s Investigative fees | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01492 | 08/10/2009 | Jacqule | The Mar-a-Lago Club Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | (SY | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01495 | 08/11/2009 | M rc lb) | Potential Witness | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01498 | 08/17/2009 | Marc Nurik | Legal opinion re:Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing. Fistos /A Lenrman + +| | RATE | N | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------|-----------------|------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01502 | 08/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Epstein Evidence | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01513 | 08/25/2009 | Jacquie | | Discovery for the girls | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01522 | 08/14/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Legal opinio\Be in J. Berger - Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | irrelevant and | not | reasonably calculated to lead | +| 08423-08425 10/09/2009 Bradley | | | | | | +| J. Mike Fisten | Subpoena info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08426 08/10/2009 J. Mike Fisten | Synopsis | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer,Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman + +| DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION, | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------------------| +| 08A41-08446 10/05/2009 Attorneys at MA William J. Berger Trial Prep Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06/26/2009 Wayne Black Brunel information Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08/05/2009 Paul Cassell Cf. Response to Motion to File | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03737 08/25/2009 Cara Computers Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03746-03753 08/02/2009 William Beige/ :Computers Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02335-02338 05/08/2009 William Berger Bradley litigation strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02360-02361 06/09/2009 SusanStirling Hearing to Unseal- Criminal Plea | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | to the discovery | of | the admissible evidence; | +| 02368-02373 10/14/2009 Jacquie illi Igor Zinoview depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Welssina. FIStO5 ist Len an + +| | DATE | IQ | FROM DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02376-02392 | 10/14/2009 | Mike Fis-ten | Igor Zinoview depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02401-02410 | 05/08/2009 | William Berger | Jane Doe li v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02414-02419 | 05/12/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jane Doe II v. Ep | 'n | | | | +| | | | ‘ 4\1 | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03669-03670 | 10/08/2009 | Carolyn | Epste | arrest m onitor | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02288-02289 | O5/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Motion date | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02292-02293 | 05/19/2009 | Dr. | Pimp and His Game | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02304-02308 | 09/17/2009 | | Jacquie Forensics/Investigations | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02313-02316 | 07/01/2009 | | William Berger Confidential Agreement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jane. weissint tistos at Lenrman + +| | DATE | M | FR | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION _ | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|-------------------------------|----------|-------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02331.02334 | 0S/08/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Caton order Transcript | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02173 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Juan Alessi | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02187 | 07/26/2009 | | Wayne Black | Epstein matter | I | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02195-02197 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Order N " | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02199.02203 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02211-02214 | 07/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein v. State of | Florida | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02224 | 07/28/2009 | Jacqule | | Witness of Epstein rapes from | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 10787-10799 | 10/19/2009 | | Jacquie | Witness List | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 1090140902 | 05/11/2009 | | William Berger | RICO Enterprise | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privile e — Dat 2-23-2011 + +a Jaffe.Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE | m | FROM 1 | DESCRIPTION | OWECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 10904-10905 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10908-10909 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise ^ | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10912-10913 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Entke‘ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10955-10963 | 06/01/2009 | | William Berger | 'Pia itness list | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10979-10981 | 06/03/2009 | | Wayne) | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11022-11025 | 06/26/2009 | | Wayne Black | Info on 2 MC2 Workers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11036-11037 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11039-11071 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Retainer from the Firm | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011 + +eJaffe, weissoz, Fistos a Lenrman + +| | PAD | 12 FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 11083-11084 | 09/04/2009 | | | | | | | +| | | Attorneys at RRA | Witness info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11105-11110 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | Disseminate letter from Wexner | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11137.11139 | 10/03/2009 | Paul Cassell | Zorro Trust resat c 'in o - | | | | | +| | | | K -‘, -A N \ ‘,7- | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11143-11146 | 10/04/2009 | William Berger | 1 Discovery Cutoff | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 1115541156 | 10/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ew Property | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11175-11183 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | Epstein Case Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11196-11197 | 05/28/2009 | SusanStfling v | | | | | | +| | | | Jail Visitors | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11205-11207 | 05/28/2009 | Patil Cassell | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +**Privilege Log – Dated 2-23-2011** + +**Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | protected by privacy rights | +| 11215 | 06/01/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Activity in Case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11238-11239 | 06/03/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Depo Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11246-11247 | 06/22/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Article | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11251-11254 | 06/23/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Info on 2 MC2 workers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11267-11268 | 06/30/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] Edwards | Witness List revised | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11282-11315 | 07/18/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11326-11331 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Donald Trump depo | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11337-11339 | 08/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | L FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11359-11362 | 08/10/2009 | Jacqule | Epstein depos | | | | | +| 11366-11371 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Trump depo info | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11377-11379 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Issuing Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11390.11395 | 08/17/2009 | Jacqule | WItnesst4 | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11400-11415 | 08/18/2009 | Jacquie | Subpoenas for pilots | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 11420-11426 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Serving Alan Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11428-11429 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys ,(a 4\RRA | Witness info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11568 | 10/07/2009 | Pau | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11587 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell I | Visoski Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Weissing, mstos & ienrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11861-11865 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ██████████ | Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11870-11871 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ██████████ | Epstein info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11874 | 08/24/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | Confidential info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11876 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Confidential info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11967-11972 | 10/29/2009 | Cara ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Subpoenas for Epstein's Attorneys | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08072-08075 | 07/22/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Total counts for E.W. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08090-08091 | 10/05/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Trial Prep | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08114-08117 | 08/18/2009 | Pat ██████████ | ██████████ | Updated Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | + +Jaffe, WeIssing..M., Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08157-08159 | 06/03/2009 | █ █ | █ █ | Vanity Fair | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08499-08501 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | █ █ | Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10063-10068 | 08/03/2009 | █ █ | Mike Fisten | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10090-10091 | 08/31/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacquie █ | Witness Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10103-10104 | 08/27/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Witness Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10106-10137 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Meetings/ Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 12569 | 07/30/2009 | Carl Linder | █ █ | Epstein Sex Abuse Litigation Forum | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15827-15837 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie █ | █ █ | Retainer for Investigator | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; | + +### Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissine. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | protected by privacy rights | +| 15820-15822 | 10/29/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | Cara ██████████ | Subpoenas for Epstein's Attorneys | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15401-15412 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ ██████████ | Disseminate the letter from wexner atty | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15356-15359 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ██████████ ██████████ | Witness info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 14934-14950 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | Bradley Edwards | Investigator info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 13413-13414 | 08/06/2009 | Denis Kleinfeld | ██████████ Edwards | Epstein information | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 13908-13911 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Meeting info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10595-10597 | 09/29/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Subpoena for Adriana ██████████ | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10621-10624 | 10/02/2009 | Bradley ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Meeting with Wexner atty | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +JatALL\_ ielssi A Mlle Fistos a Lenrman + +| | | i n | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|------------------------|--------|------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | William Berger | Trial Prep | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10681-10692 | 10/07/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Depositions | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10777-10786 | 10/16/2009 | | Paul Cassell | New Evidence | | teen | | | | | +| | | | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04094-04100 | 04/07/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | | | | | | | +| | | | | ( rtio | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02915 | 10/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Elston | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 02971 | 10/14/2009 | Jacquie | Bradley Edwards | Larry Visoskl d epo | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02976 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Joh n | | | | | | | | | +| | | r iN1 | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | Disseminate the | letter | from | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02995 | 06/24/2009 | Bradley Edwards | | Litigation Strategy | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10172.10178 | 08/12/2009 | | Jacquie | Trump Depo | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Loy — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | pm | to | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | pattcrion | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|---|---------------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 10193 | 08/11/2009 | | Jacquie | | Trump Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10255 | 09/09/2009 | | William Berger | | Depo of Man Dersh | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10259-10263 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys of RRA | Jacquie | | Cooperfiel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 03876-03877 | 10/26/2009 | | Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| | | | | | 4\ , | | | | | +| | | | | | n rategy | | | | | +| | | | | S | tmt. | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 03879-03884 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 03886-03891 | 07/13/2009 | | f:ZRIssell | | litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03905-03920 | 09/08/2009 | William Berger | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03937 | 08/17/2009 | Carolyn | | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | + +a Jaffe. Weissine. a, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | pALE | M | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04005-04011 | 05/13/2009 | | William Berger | Discovery | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04070-04093 | 04/07/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion to Strike | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03754 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Conference | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03848-03858 | 09/09/2009 | | Jacquie | Coolie eId ervice | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03642-03643 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | | 1. Accounts/ 2. Motion for IME | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03657-03661 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at ARA | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02475 | 06/15/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02494-02515 | D9/20/2009 | | Pat | Mark Epstein Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Low- Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissine, Ftstos & Lenrman + +| BATES | DATE 12 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------------|--------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 02520-02543 | 06/06/2009 | Paul Cassell | Memo of Assest Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02548-02553 | 08/03/2009 | Beth Williamson | Federal Subpoena | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02560-02565 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie | Federal Subpoen | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | rotected b | rIva ri hts | | +| 02568-02570 | 10/13/2009 | Jacquie | New rock | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02578-02583 | 05/28/2009 | 7Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | tlon Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02619-02622 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Bradlelgdwerds | | | | | | +| | | | New client Retainer | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | protected privacy rights by | | | +| 02633-02646 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell lliki,r, | | | | | | +| | | k \O | | | | | | +| | | IIIII | Response to | Motion to | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07959-07964 | 09/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +# Jaffe.Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman + +| PALE IQ FROM DESCRIPliON | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------|------------| +| 07967-07975 09/22/2009 lacquie Mike Fisten Subpoena on Epstein case Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07979-08000 08/18/2009 Jacqule Subpoenas for Pilots | | | | +| `Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07735-07736 07/24/2009 Jacquie Releases for theta Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07643-07645 09/09/2009 Jacqule New dieta\pr | | | | +| ( S\ | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07698-07706 09/06/2009 Paul Cassell Answ to the Complaint | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07620-07632 08/14/2009 Jacquie Bradl Review of "Notice of Taking Depo | | | | +| Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | +| 07635-07636 10/15/2009 Mike Fisten illill.. | | | | +| Questions from forensic | | | | +| accountant detecting Epstein | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07617-07618 07/ 13/2009 Pau Epstein strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07550-07589 10/30/2009 I Paul Cassell Motion to Supplement with the Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jane. weissing. ristos ai t.enrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | | Visoski depo | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | | | +| 07595-07604 | 05/20/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Utigation Strategy | | | | +| | | | | | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07616 | 07/22/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07530-07549 | 06/11/2009 | | —Susan Stirling | Overtlme 4 \ | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07470-07507 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | | lielc)timpel | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07447-07469 | 10/13/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mlle | | | | | +| | | | | New Times Ankle on epstein | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07444-07446 | 05/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Response to Motion | to | | | +| | | | | | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07440 | 10/18/2009 | Atto ys a RRA | | New Trump Property | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07436 | 04/11/2009 | Adler | | New cases | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Wei i Fistos & Lehrman + +| | RAT€ TO | FROM | ciESCRIPT10N | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07424-07431 | 09/26/2009 | Paul (-Acton | Need Depo Transcript | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07412-07423 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07403-07411 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07394-07402 | 07/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | Multiple 2255 Counts | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07386-07392 | 05/28/2009 | William Berger | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07378-07385 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07370-07377 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07354-07369 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | Motion to Protect 2nd | depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | /0 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJE,CTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07346 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | | Motion to protect 2nd depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07337 | 10/28/2009 | | Jeanne | Motion to protect r d depo | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 07328 | 10/28/2009 | | Beth Williamson | Motion to proteca | | | | | +| | | | | AAIII IIC.) | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07319 | 10/28/2009 | | Jacquie | Motion to protect r d depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07313-07318 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | aidwardsk\ | | | | | | +| | | | / / \-- | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07287.07301 | 07/08/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion to Compel — File this | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07252.07278 | 09/08/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion for IME +Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07247-07251 | 09/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for IME + Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jatte, Weissing. + +| | Jan | ig, | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|--------------|-----------------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 07230-07233 | 06/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Memo on Asset Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07157.07158 | 09/29/2009 | =Adler | | RE: Mark | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07128-07141 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for bond a transfer | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 07094-07098 | 09/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| | | | | letter on RE Motions to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07025.07027 | 10/29/2009 | | Paul rAccPll | M. and E.W. v. Epstein — | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07099-07106 | 09/14/2009 | | _ack | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07071-07078 | 07/23/2009 | Paul Cassell ( N, | | | | | | | +| | | (7 1%ll | | | | | | | +| | | | | LM.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07066-07070 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | LM.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07015-07016 | 10/13/2009 | I | Paul Cassell | Evidence of Asset transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +FiSt05 & tenrman + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos& Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | and/or liquidations | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07019-07024 | 10/29/2009 | [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | L.M. and E.W. v. Epstein – I'm on it | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06837-06839 | 04/08/2009 | Beth Williamson | [REDACTED] | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06826-06836 | 04/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | Beth Williamson | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06823-06825 | 04/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | Beth Williamson | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06813-06816 | 07/02/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley [REDACTED] | Doe v. Epstein Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06808-06810 | 09/13/2009 | [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff – Running a giant Ponzi scheme?" | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06804-06805 | 09/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff – Running a giant Ponzi scheme?" | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06794 | 10/23/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Interesting Web Site | Work product; attorney/client privilege | + +**Privilege Log – Dated 2-23-2011** + +**Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06800-06803 | 09/06/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | RE: 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06761-06762 | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | IME Rules | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06767-06769 | 09/10/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie | IME's | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06782-06787 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Confidential Detailed Strategy Memo on Asset Protection Issues | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06744-06747 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley | Depo of Jeffrey Epstein | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06736-06739 | 05/01/2009 | ██████████ Edwards | Paul Cassell | Asset Protection Issue | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06709-06710 | 10/14/2009 | ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Igor Zinoview depo | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe. eissin FIstos & Lehrman + +| fall§ | PAU | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|-------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06691-06696 | 07/09/2009 | | Paul Cassell | How many 2255 claims? | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06683-06686 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Hiding Assets | | | | | +| | | | | | 1/4 to | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06654 | 07/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Secretary Contacting | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06599-06600 | 07/08/ 2009 | | Paul Cassell | Hidin | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06574-06590 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Ed | +on to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06567-06570 | 07/09/2009 | | Paul CC | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06558-06561 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Ca | | | | | | | +| | | | | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +I , Jane. weissing, i PISTOS & tenrman + +| | DATE | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|--------------|----------------------------------|----------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06554-06557 | 05/14/2009 | | | | | | | +| | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06549-06553 | 05/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06540-06541 | 09/21/2009 | Mike Fisten | Info on Maxwell | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06537 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Doe v.Jeffnty Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06529-06530 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | protected by privacy rights \ i/ | | | | | +| 06496-06505 | 10/20/2009 | Paul Cassell | Vlsoski depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06177-06181 | 09/25/2009 | Willia Be r | Financial discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06149-06153 | 07/10/2009 | Pau Cassell | Federal First | | | | | +| | | | | Amendment Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissine.i ristos a Lenrman + +| | DATE | iv | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|-----------------------------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06118-06146 | 09/15/2009 | Seth Lehrman | | Farnsworth v. Marys case Work | product; | attorney/cilent | privilege; | +| 06113-06117 | 07/14/2009 | | Richard Wolfe | Facebook/Myspace Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06106-06112 | 05/19/2009 | Amy Swan | William Berger | Expert Witness | | | | +| | | | | Work | product | attorney/diem | privilege; | +| 06091 | 08/04/2009 | William Berger | Paul Cassell | | | | | +| | | | | r EWand LM v. Epstein Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06001-06011 | 07/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | EdulQrps | Epstein's Address and Position of | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05996 | 04/08/2009 | Edwards | | | | | | +| | | e rssr | | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05998-06000 | 09/17/2009 | ..,Ja la .. | | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05992 | 04/19/2009 | I | Marc Nurik | Litigation Strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissiniz, i Fistos & Lenrman + +| | PATE | _IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|----------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05968 | 10/17/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05944-05947 | 05/01/2009 | William Berger | | litigation Strategy ' | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05927 | 09/18/2009 | | Amy Swan | Ryan | | | | | +| | | | | ( c\ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05931-05932 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | | | | | | | +| | | | | ene Cell Phone Number | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05919-05920 | 07/28/2009 | | Amy n | Client's Cell Phone Number | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05915 | 04/22/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05911 | 05/28/2009 | Bradley | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jatte, Weissing. i Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | FROM | E IPTION | | 0I3JECTI9N | | | +|-------------|-----------------|--------------------|-----------------------------|------|------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05890 | 07/27/2009 illi | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05893-05894 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05898-05899 | 07/28/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy - | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05885 | 09/15/2009 | lacquie | Litlgatk tegy | | | | | +| | | | K 1r | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05874-05879 | 07/23/2009 | Jacquie | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05868 | 08/03/2009 | Ken Jenne | | | | | | +| | | 'fiCr ir | | | | | | +| | | | Epstein Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05865 | 09/10/2009 | Brad Ed ds Jacqule | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05860-05861 | 09/10/2009 | Maribel Matiska | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jane. weissing, i Fistos & Lenrrnan + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|----------------|---------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05845 | 07/24/2009 | | Ken Jenne | Plane Tail Numbers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05811 | 06/09/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Witness Numbers | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05813 | 08/15/2009 | | Ken Jenne | Litigation | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 05748-05749 | 08/11/2009 | | Jaoquie | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05711 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | tclwACti* | s) Subpoena Clinton | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05701-05704 | 04/20/2009 | | Russell Adler | Epstein strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05687 | 08/21/2009 | Bradley Eciviards | Marc Nurik | Alfredo Rodriguez | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05690-05691 | 05/11/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE itt FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05680.05682 05/11/2009 William Berger Subpoena Clinton Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05676 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Mike Fisten Topics for Meeting | | | | +| Acc i r)Srl | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05648 07/23/2009 Attorneys at MA Gary Assem psteln litigation | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05629 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten w Enforcement cannot release | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05621-05622 09/18/2009 Amy Swan Brad Preparing Motion to take an IME | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| | protected by privacy | rights | | +| 05610-05612 04/27/2009 Susan Stirli? | | | | +| - A\ C) | | | | +| la Request for Copies Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 08/24/2009 Attorneys at MA Travel restrictions Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jerre, weissing. towards. ristos a Lenrman + +| QATE IQ FROM DESCRIPTION, | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05575-05576 08/21/2009 Marc Nurik Alfredo Rodriguez Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05582 09/11/2009 Mike Fasten Epstein strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05569-05570 08/17/2009 Marc Nurik Legal Opinion | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05556-05558 08/14/2009 Attorneys at MA Corn with legal expert Work | | | | +| irrelevant I | and not | | | +| zilis lafcn | | | | +| 05537 07/30/2009 Jacquie Edwardi% ieo—/ objections from defense | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05534 07/24/2009 Ken Jenne Flight logs for Epstein Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05518 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Assemble Epstein Litigation | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05512-05513 07/23/2009 Priscila | | | | +| Nora Batian Assemble Epstein Litigation | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +# Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. ristos & Lenrman + +| | DAj | TO | FROM | pEsatIPTION | OBJECTION, | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|-------------------|----------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05502-05507 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie | | Wayne Black's email | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05475 | 04/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Call with Chris Hanson from | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05471-05472 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Legal expert I gal issue | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05447 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William ilergerzt | nication with legal expert | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05420-05423 | 05/20/2009 | William Berger | rill# | Research on cases saying a judge | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05409-05412 | 08/17/2009 | | arc urik | Legal opinion regarding | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05403-05405 | 04/27/2009 | M ft) | | Jeffrey Epstein Wikipedia page | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# fiLdeLLL2. Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | | | fiLdeLLL2. | Dated 2-23-2011 | | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | Jane. weissme, ma | ristos & Lenrman | | | | | +| | I DALE | TO | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | | | | | | | +| | | | | Proposal for settlement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | | Proposal for settlement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05271.05272 | 07/22/2009 | | Jacquie | Depo Dates to take SR, LM, and | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05259.05260 | 07/22/2009 | | Jacqule | Investigator retainer | | | | | +| | | | | A llS S e | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05238 | 07/14/2009 | | William Be | | | | | | +| -05241 | | | C | | | | | | +| | | | | request to produce | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05240 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Je a) | | | | | | +| | | | 1CZ IIIIIV | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05197-05199 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at BRA | | | | | | | +| | | ...4 ) | | | | | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne | Michael Reiter info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 tarmer, Jane, weissine. i ristos a cerirrnan + +| SATES DAR TO ROM D iPT1 | OBJECTION | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05155-05156 04/20/2009 Adler Set Epstein's depo duces tecum Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05159-05160 05/28/2009 William Berger Right to move to reconside< | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05149-05150 05/27/2009 Susan Stirling Epstein filed a n to | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05153 08/24/2009 Mike Flsten EpsteirTtrav | | | | +| work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05146-05147 05/26/2009 Paul Cassell The response to the motion to | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05137-05144 05/20/2009 Attorneys at RRA Russell Adler Epstein litigation strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05133-05136 05/11/2009 William Berger Subpoena Clinton and others on | | | | +| Sid witness list | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01749-01751 10/28/2009 Phaedra Xanthos Final affidavit from forensic | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| Una | DATE | Jo | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|------------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05125-05132 | 05/05/2009 | William Berger | | Response to motion to compel all | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05115-O5117 | 04/27/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Epstein depos | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01699 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie | | VZ depot\ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05120-05121 | 05/04/2009 | William Berger | | e /Cte r asking 5" how the depo of | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05095-05098 | 07/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Epstein v. State of Florida — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01694 | 10/17/2009 | Jacquie | | PFS | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05066-05067 | 05/06/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Epstein sealed records and TV | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Loa — 2-23-2011 + +Jane. welssing. i ristos a Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCBIPTRI | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|--------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05054-05065 | 08/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Potential witnesses | Wotk | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05049.05053 | 08/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Subpoenas for potential | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04957-04964 | 09/04/2009 | | Scott | Juan Alessi statement and | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04952-04953 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at MA | Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | | Epstein injunction filing — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 0495544956 | 09/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA MEM/ | | Epstein Invoice | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04916-04920 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | | | | | | | +| | | ill‘ e \ | | | | | | | +| | | | PlE y | Updates on # of victims, billing | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04899 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| MI | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04893.04896 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04890 | 09/10/2009 | Jacqule | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04884-04885 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | Epstein Discovery | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01469 | 07/17/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Discussions about the Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04745-04747 | 08/04/2009 | | Jacquie Joh | Epstein depo in New York | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04738-04744 | 08/25/2009 | | P | | | | | | +| | | | ,j 1 | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04660 | 10/22/2009 | Edwards | Marc Nurik | Epstein AUSA — Attorneys Fees | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04642-04646 | 09/11/2O09 | | | | | | | | +| | | Bradley | Beth Williamson | Discussions about Brad's | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privilege Loa — 23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissina. Fistos& Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04607-04617 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | Holding Fed Subs until we get response on form | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04526-04535 | 10/17/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Two ideas regarding strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04488-04490 | 07/18/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Taking the 5 th | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01362 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | ██████████ | Getting the forensic aspect off the ground -epstein's asset transfers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04481-04487 | 08/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley Edwards | Epstein Subpoena | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05465-05467 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Subpoenas for trial | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05470 | 07/11/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Flight Logs | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05496-05497 | 08/10/2009 | ██████████ | Alfredo | Phone Numbers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; | + +Jaffe, WelS\$R1R, ristos at kenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | Rodriguez | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05501 | 07/21/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Litigation strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05524-05533 | 07/23/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Addresses for people involved in the case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05541 | 07/31/2009 | Carolyn ██████████ | ██████████ | All depos in jane doe's case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05635 | 10/22/2009 | Pat ██████████ | ██████████ | New developments that require your expertise | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe. Weissina. FIstos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05640 | 10/29/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | New Epstein victim | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05652-05653 | 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn [REDACTED] | personal discussion | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05671 | 10/22/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Pat [REDACTED] | Litigation strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05696 | 05/11/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Phone number for one of the other girls on the list of prospective clients | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05815-05816 | 04/01/2009 | Carolyn [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Taking the depos of everyone | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05820-05821 | 07/23/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Dates for depos of all witnesses in the case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | + +# Privilege Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| gag TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05824-05825 07/23/2009 Wayne Black Paula Heil Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07/23/2009 Wayne Black Dates for depos of all witnesses | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05833-05835 07/23/2009 Wayne Black | | | | +| FBI has orIgi mit logs and | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05839-05841 07/23/2009 Wa Copies of the flight logs Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05869.05870 04/01/2009 Carolyn_; OM Personal convo between Brad | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| \ | protected by privacy rights | | | +| 05913-05914 04/01/2009 | | | | +| Carolyn Edwards Personal convo between Brad | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane, Weissine,i Fistos & Lenrman + +| | RAE | TO | IOM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|---------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------|------------|-------------------------|------------| +| 05995 | 04/01/2009 | | Carolyn | Third party subpoenas for | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06513-06523 | 06/15/2009 | | Wayne Black | Ghisella Maxwell info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06699-06701 | 06/17/2009 | Wayne Black | | Epstein litigation(ts) | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07079.07089 | 09/03/2009 | | Pat | DiscasnACt aisot Al5 t girls v Involved in | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07437-07439 | 10/19/2009 | Paul ra sell | Ronald ' | New evidence of Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07936-07958 | 04/28/2009 | Earleen Cote | | | | | | | +| | | ‘ .4141, | | | | | | | +| | | | | Cases against mansion nightclub | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08006-08011 | 06/03/2009 | hA llili l6 l | Wayne Black | Getting addresses for people for | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11186-11187 | 08/19/2009 | M- | im | Plaintiff's Witness List | Work | e product; | y attorney/client /dieM | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissi Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 26479-26481 | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Assistance on the Epstein Case | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 27155-27159 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | PACER entries | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26604-26605 | 10/27/2009 | Phaedra Xanthos | Ken Jenne | Political | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26570 | 08/13/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Marc Nurik | iscusslons about Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 04954 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacqul | Creation of another Doe file | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06665-06670 | 08/12/2009 | Shawn Gilbert\ | | | | | | | +| | | Ili | ll | | | | | | +| | | | | Epstein Costs | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06675.06676 | 08/26/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Personal convo in regards to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privileee Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------|--------------------------------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06679.06682 | 08/26/2009 | | Shawn Gilbert | Personal convo in regards to | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07590-07594 | 05/13/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Office information Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08451-08453 | 08/17/2009 | | Pat | Updated Witness List | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08455-08456 | 06/03/2009 | | | V Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08466-08479 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | | | | | +| | | | ( 14/ | | | | | +| | | | | itness info that we need to use Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01767 | 07/06/2009 | Wayne Black | Edwards | Info on a guy going to victim's | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08379 | 06/06/2009 | | Wayne Black | Info on Former FHP trooper | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08399 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Epstein affidavit to the reply | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissiria. FISIOS & tenrman + +| | DATE | 12 | | DESCRIPTION | OIRCT1ON | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|-------------------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08406 | 10/30/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Adler | Flying epstein rape survivor to St. | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05697 | 08/19/2009 | | Mike listen | Meeting with client | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20330-20334 | 08/24/2009 | | Pat | Serving Alan DershowItz | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20327-20329 | 10/17/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike listen | Pro agr hased by Epstein in | | | | | +| | | | i | llIV | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20100-20102 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Epstein's arrival at his building | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20283-20326 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at MA | Mike listen | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20092-20099 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at MA | | | | | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne | Epstein travel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +ffe. In Fistos & Lehrman + +| | PM | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|-------------|---------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 20085-20091 | 10/15/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Questions from accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19996-20084 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Visoski Research and | | | | | +| | | | | Questioe | ) | | | | +| | | | | | ork | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20217-20218 | 08/04/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Info on Coppe | | | | | +| | | | | / 6. | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20213-20216 | 08/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | In n Copperfield | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20211.20212 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | | ots depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | i r , | | | | | | +| 20207-20210 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | | list of witness | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20201-20204 | 08/24/2009 | Attorne\ts atitRA | | Serving Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissing,IIMMI Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | MOO | | | | +|------------------------|--------------|------------------|-------------|----------------------------------|------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 20193-20200 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Proof of him being out of FL — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19982-19985 | 09/03/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Dave Rogers depo | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19988 | 10/07/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Depositions \HS , \"1" | | | | | +| | | | | ASAC oi | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19971-19981 08/24/2009 | | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | SOVIsDershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19969-19970 | '-08/18/2009 | | Mike FIC | bpoenas for Pilots | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19962.19968 | 08/03/2009 | | ten | Working with the FBI to get some | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20190-20192 | 08/24/2009 | Pat Roberts | | Personal emails regarding Brad's | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20187-20189 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Epstein travel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +# Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissin Fistos &Lehrman + +| | PM | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|---------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | 07/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Flight logs for Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | 07/09/2009 | | Paul Cassell | 2255 Problem | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15366.15367 | 09/04/20O9 | Attorneys at RRA | | Witness Inf that to use | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 010O3-01005 | 10/12/2009 | | Paul Cassell | m ement by Jeffrey | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01013-01014 | 10/29/2009 | | Cara | Subpoenaing Epstein's attorneys | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01042 | 07/22/2009 | Marc Nurik | | | | | | | +| | | ? S | | | | | | | +| | | | Bradley | New Info that our investigators | | | | | +| | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03133-03134 | 06/09/2009 | Josh | | Personal conversation | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +napastuingadmaen n + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 03129-03130 | 06/09/2009 | Josh [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03119-03121 | 06/09/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Josh [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05440-05441 | 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) | CW Personal information | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02593-02594 | 05/13/2009 | T. [REDACTED] (wife) | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Regarding personal information. | Privileged document- irrelevant and not calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence, privacy rights of parties involved, spouse privilege | +| 18877-18879 | 09/10/2009 | Marc Nurik | Bradley Edwards | Concerning the names of potential witnesses and the issuance of subpoena's for them. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18344-18347 | 08/24/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +# Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 + +| Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | +| 18339-18340 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | [REDACTED] | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18341-18343 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18853-18854 | 09/10/2009 | [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Concerning the names of potential witnesses and the issuance of subpoena's for them. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18337-18338 | 08/03/2009 | [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18306 | 10/16/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] | Ken Jenne | List of future depo's in Epstein case and names of potential witnesses. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18307 | 10/17/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein Assets. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +### Privilege Log- Dated -23-2011 + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------|-------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-----|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 18308-18309 | 10/18/2006 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18188-18189 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18184-18185 | 08/26/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18186-18187 | 08/31/2009 | | Jacquie | Discussion of potential witnesses | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 18180.18183 | 08/24/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05256.05257 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | pEscaornon | | | mom | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------|---------------|------------|-----|------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05253 | 08/24/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05279-05280 | 08/24/2O09 | Pat | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05315-05318 | 07/26/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | strategy of | set\ c | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05209-05211 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | I es t e | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +!v\* + +# EXHIBIT I + +NOT A CERTIFICATE COPY + +### DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY IN MAY 2012 THAT ARE ON HIS FEBRUARY 23, 2011, PRIVILEGE LOG AND IDENTIFIED ON EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017 EXHIBIT LIST + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege B | +| 94 | 5/22/09 | | | | +| | 12:13 p.m. | E-mail from Wendel (01449) | J. to Susan Spencer | . 52 Aqk | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01449 | 5/22/09 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P evidence | .; not reasonably lated to lead to discovery of admissible | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | +|-----|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 95 | 5/22/09 | | | | +| | E-mail fro 12:21 p.m. Edwarci | strencer Wendell to | J. | p. 55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05148 | 5/22/09 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 97 | 5/26/09 | | | | +| | 5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to (05151) | J. | p. 55 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05151 | 5/26/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------------|----|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Pr liege | +| 98 | 5/28/09 | | | p. 55 | +| | 2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to (05161) | J. | Act rk | + +| ██████████ JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05161 | 5/28/09 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger
(02241-02242) | p. 46 | + +| FARMER JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 02241-02242 | 5/28/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|-----------|-------------|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 102 | 6/9/09 | | | | +| | 3:10 p.m. | E-mail from | J. to Eric Glasser (06655) | pp. 54-55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 06655 | 6/9/09 | Confidential | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------|----|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Pr liege | +| 105 | 6/23/09 | | | | +| | 1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (05239) | J. | p. 55 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05239 | 6/23/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S | ET16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|---------|-----------|--------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 106 | 6/23/09 | | | | +| | | | J. to Michele Dargan | p. SS | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 05203 | 6/23/09 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 107 | 6/23/09 | | | | +| | 1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (05277-05278) | J. | p. 55 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 6/23/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 05277- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|---------------------|---|----------| +| 108 | 6/23/09 | | | | | +| | 2:31 p.m. | E-mail from (05207-05208) | J. to Michele Dugan | | p. 55 | +| | | | P | % | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05207-05208 | 6/23/09 | Confidential Course | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(05324-05325) | p. 55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05324-05325 | 6/23/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Log | +| 110 | 6/23/09 | | | | +| | 2:53 p.m. | E-mail from (05212-05213) | J. to Michele Dargan | p. 47 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05212-05213 | 6/23/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------|----|---|-------| +| No. | Date | Document | | P | liege | +| 111 | 6/23/09 | | | | | +| | 3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (05344-05346) | J. | | p. 48 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05344-05346 | 6/23/09 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(05215-05217) | p. 47 | + +| FARMER JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05215-05217 | 6/23/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Secret Plea Deal of Epstein providing new witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 113 | 6/23/09 | | | | +| | 4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (05368-05369) | J. | p.55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05368-05369 | 6/23/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------------------|---|----------| +| 114 | 6/23/09 | | | | | +| | 5:22 p.m. | E-mail from (05220-05221) | J. to Michele Dargan | | p. 55 | +| | | | P | % | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05220-05221 | 6/23/09 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(05387-05388) | p. 55 | + +| 05387- | Date/'- 6/2 | o | From Confidential Source | Description Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | Objection W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +|--------|----------------|---|--------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| | ( .111" \ Thfr | | | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| \ | \hi} | | | | | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 116 | 6/24/09 | | | | +| | 9:39 a.m. | E-mail from (05224-05225) | J. to Michele Dargan | p. 55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05224-05225 | 6/24/09 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 119 | 7/4/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger
(02204) | pp. 46-47 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 02204 | 7/14/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation St | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(04906) | p. 55 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 04906 | 7/15/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | Document | | | Privilege | +|-----|-----------|-------------------------------|----|---|-----------| +| 121 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to | J. | | | +| | | | m_ | d | Log p. SS | +| | 1:22 p.m. | (04905) | | | | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 04905 | 7/15/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---|-------| +| No. | Date | Document | P | liege | +| 124 | 7/22/09 | | | | +| | E-mail from 11:22 a.m. (01479) | J. to Michele Dargan rk | | p. 52 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 01479 | 7/22/09 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(05803) | p. 49 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05803 | 7/22/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 129 | 7/28/09 | | | | +| | 8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Wendel (01483) | J. to Susan Spencer | p. 52 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 01483 | 7/28/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Additional Information Re: Epstein Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------|----|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Pr liege | +| 130 | 7/28/09 | | | p. 53 | +| | 8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to (03070) | J. | Act | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|--------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 03070 | 7/28/09 | [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(01486) | p. 52 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 01486 | 7/28/09 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|------------|------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 132 | 7/28/09 | | | | +| | 10:00 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (05848) | J. | p. 50 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05848 | 7/28/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------|----|---|-------| +| No. | Date | Document | | P | liege | +| 134 | 7/28/09 | | | | | +| | 1:47 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (11075-11076) | J. | | p. 57 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 11075-11076 | 7/29/09 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information Re: Epstein Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(05852-05853) | p. 50 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05852-05853 | 7/29/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 136 | 7/30/09 | | | | +| | 2:36 p.m. | E-mail from (05535-05536) | J. to Michele Dargan | P. 48 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05535-05536 | 7/30/09 | Confidential Source | Additional Information Re: Epstein Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | P | liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------------------|---|---|-------| +| 137 | 7/30/09 | | | | | | +| | 2:36 p.m. | E-mail from (11320-11322) | J. to Michele Dargan | | | p. 57 | +| | | | P | % | | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 11320-11322 | 7/30/99 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +--- + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(05538-05539) | | p. 48 | + +--- + +| FARMER JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05538-05539 | 7/30/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +--- + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(11080-11082) | | p. 57 | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(05538-05539) | p. 48 | + +| | Date | | T | From | Description | Objection | +|--------|------|---|-------------------|------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | ("R | , | | | | | +| \ | I ' | | | | | | +| 05538- | 7/3 | | Confidential urce | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | +|-----|------------|---------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 139 | 7/31/09 | | | | +| | 11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to (11080-11082) | J. | p. 57 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 11080-11082 | 7/31/09 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information Re: Epstein Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | | +|-----|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---|---|-------| +| No. | Date | Document | | P | liege | +| 140 | 8/10/09 | | | | | +| | E-mail from 6:59 p.m. (06965) | J. to Michael Isikoff | | | p. 50 | +| | | P | % | | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06965 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S j | EW16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|---------|-------------|--------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 141 | 8/10/09 | | | | +| | | from | chael Isikoff to J. | p. 50 | + +| | | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | +|-------|---------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | From | Description | Objection | +| 06967 | 8/11 | | | | +| | \- ("b) | | | | +| | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 142 | 8/11/09 | | | | +| | 8:43 a.m. | E-mail from (06968-06969) | J. to Michael Isikoff | p. 50 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/11/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 06968- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | Document | | | | P | liege | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------------|----|---|----|---|-------| +| 143 | 8/11/09 | | | | | | | +| | 9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to (06963-06964) | J. | | | | p. 50 | +| | | | | c | a% | | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06963-06964 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|---------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 144 | 8/11/09 | | | | +| | | from | J. to Michael Isikoff | p. 50 | + +| Date | o | From | Description | Objection | +|-----------------|---|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/11 n | | | | | +| 06970- ____\‘-) | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | +|-----|------------|----------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 145 | 8/11/09 | | | | +| | 12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to (06959-06960) | J. | p. 50 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06959-06960 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | Document | | | | P | liege | +|-----|-----------|----------------------------------------|----|---|----|---|-------| +| 146 | 8/14/09 | | | | | | | +| | 4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to (06975) | J. | | | | p. 50 | +| | | | | c | a% | | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06975 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|---------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 148 | 8/15/09 | | | | +| | | from | J. to Michael Isikoff | p. 50 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06972-06973 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|------------|----------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 149 | 8/17/09 | | | | +| | 10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to (06976-06977) | J. | p. 50 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/11/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 06976- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--|------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege
Log | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] | | p. 47 | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 02442 | 8/17/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation St | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|---------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 152 | 8/24/09 | | | | +| | | | J. to | p. 52 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 01506 | 8/24/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|------------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 153 | 8/25/09 | | | | | +| | 11:03 a.m. | E-mail from (05952-05953) | to | J. | p. 50 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/25/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 05952- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|---------------------|------------------------------------------|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | Pr liege | +| 154 | 8/26/09 E-mail from | | | +| | 9:56 p.m. (02269) | J. to | p. 53 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 02269 | 8/26/09 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|-------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | | Privilege Log | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | p. 53 | | + +| | | Date | From Confidential | Descri tion Additional | Objection W/P Priv.; not reasonably | +|-------|---|------|-------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 02895 | | 8/31 | Source | Information Re: Epstein Molestations | calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | +| | \ | C) | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 157 | 9/7/09 | | | | | +| | 1:39 p.m. | E-mail from (07612-07613) | to | J. | p. 51 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|--------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9/7/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 07612- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------|----------|----|---|----|----------| +| 158 | 9/7/09 | | | | | | | +| | 6:42 p.m. | E-mail from | to | J. | | | p. 53 | +| | | (02595-02596) | | | c | a% | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 02595-02596 | 9/7/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07614-07615 | 9/7/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|--------------| +| 160 | 9/7/09 | | | | | +| | 7:00 p.m. | E-mail from (07605-07606) | to | J. | p. 51 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|--------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9/7/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 07605- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|--|------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | | Privilege
Log | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | | | p. 51 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|--------|----|--------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9/7/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 07607- | | Source | Litigation St | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S 1 | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|--------|-------------|-----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | | | +| | | | Document | Privilege | +| 162 | 9/7/09 | | | | +| | | from | to J. | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07609-07611 | 9/7/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 163 | 9/8/09 | | | +| | E-mail from 11:43 a.m. (04015) | J. to | p. 54 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 04015 | 9/8/09 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | | P liege | +| 164 | 9/8/09 | | | | +| | E-mail from 11:50 a.m. (07646) | to | J. | p. 51 iN | + +| | Date | To | From | Description Providing N | Objection W/P Priv.; not reasonably | +|-------|--------|----|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 07646 | 9/8/09 | | Confidential Source | Witness | calculated to lead to discovery of admissible | +| | | | | k | evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07647 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|------------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 166 | 9/8/09 | | | | | +| | 12:04 p.m. | E-mail from (07676-07677) | to | 3. | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07676-07677 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------|----------|----|---|----|----------| +| 167 | 9/8/09 | | | | | | | +| | 1:59 p.m. | E-mail from | to | J. | | | p. 51 | +| | | (07674-07675) | | | c | a% | | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07674-07675 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07678-07679 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 169 | 9/8/09 | | | | | +| | 2:36 p.m. | E-mail from (07684-07685) | to | J. | p. 51 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07684-07685 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------|----------|----|----|----------| +| 171 | 9/8/09 | | | | | | +| | 2:49 p.m. | E-mail from | to | J. | | p. 51 | +| | | (07695-07697) | | | r% | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07695-07697 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07682-07683 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 172 | 9/8/09 | | | | | +| | 3:25 p.m. | E-mail from (07680-07681) | to | J. | p. 51 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07680-07681 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege
Log | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | | p. 51 | +| (07686-07688) | | | | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07686-07688 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S 1 | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | +|-----|--------|-------------|-----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | | | +| | | | Document | Privilege | +| 174 | 9/8/09 | | | | +| | | from | to J. | p. 51 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07689-07691 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Lo: | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 175 | 9/8/09 | | | | | +| | 7:53 p.m. | E-mail from (07692-07694) | to | J. | p. 51 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 07692-07694 | 9/8/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege
Log | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | p. 48 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 05619-05620 | 9/18/09 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan
(01280-01288) | p. 56 | + +| FARMER JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 01280-01288 | 9/18/09 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | +|-----|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 182 | 9/21/09 | | | | +| | E-mail from 1:37 p.m. (03081) | to | J. | p. 54 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 03081 | 9/21/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Providing Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | Document | | | | P liege | +|-----|-------------------------------|----------|----|---|---|---------| +| 183 | 9/23/09 | | | | | | +| | E-mail from 8:42 p.m. (04320) | to | J. | | | p. 47 | +| | | | | P | % | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 04320 | 9/24/09 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | p. 47 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 04321 | 9/24/09 | Confidential Source | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | Privilege Log | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------|----------|----|---------------| +| 185 | 9/24/09 | | | | | +| | 6:53 a.m. | E-mail from (04318-04319) | to | J. | p. 47 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|--------------|------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9/24/09 | Confidential | | | | +| 04318- | Source | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | Pr liege | +|-----|-----------|---------------|----------|----|----|----------| +| 186 | 9/24/09 | | | | | | +| | | E-mail from | to | J. | | p. 56 | +| | 8:45 p.m. | (10586-10589) | | | r% | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 10586-
10589 | 9/24/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential
Source | Additional
Information Re:
Epstein
Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably
calculated to lead to
discovery of admissible
evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from Conchita | [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc | p. 54 | +| | | Renee/Carlos | [REDACTED] (02913) | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 02913 | 9/28/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|------------|-------------|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege Lo | +| 188 | 9/28/09 | E-mail from | J. to | p. 50 | +| | 10:06 a.m. | (06789) | | | + +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 06789 | 9/28/09 | | Confidential | | | +| | | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|---------------------|------------------------------------------|----|----------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Pr liege | +| 189 | 9/28/09 E-mail from | | | | +| | 10:20 a.m. (06788) | to | J. | p. 50 rk | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|--------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06788 | 9/28/09 | [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege Log | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to ██████████ (19986-19987) | p. 55 | + +| | Date | 'To T | From | Description Additional | Objection | +|--------|------|--------------|------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 19986- | 9/2 | Confidential | | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably | +| | CV | ,'Source | | Information Re: Epstein Molestations | calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | +| \ | Ns" | | | | | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | +|-----|-----------|-------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 194 | 10/2/09 | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to | J. | p.50 | +| | 4:28 p.m. | (06979-06980) | | | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8/11/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 06979- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | | +|-----|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----|---|-------| +| No. | Date | Document | | P | liege | +| 195 | 10/2/09 | | | | | +| | E-mail from 4:52 p.m. 02441) | .I. to Mike Fisten (02 | | | p. 47 | +| | | r | ig% | | | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|---------|------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 02440-02441 | 10/2/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S | MBEir16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | +|-----|---------|-----------|----------------------------|-----------| +| No. | Date | | Document | Privilege | +| 196 | 10/2/09 | | | | +| | | from | J. to Michael Isikoff, cc | p. 50 | + +| | | Date | From | Description | Objection | +|-------|---|------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 06974 | | 8/11 | | | | +| | \ | C) | | | | +| | | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | Privilege Log | +|-----|-----------|---------|--------------------------------|----|----|---------------| +| 197 | 10/2/09 | | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to | | | | +| | | Jac Lae | 06955-6956 | | | | +| | 6:14 p.m. | | | J. | cc | p. 50 | + +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +|---------|----|--------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 10/2/09 | | Confidential | | | +| 06955- | | Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| No. | Date | Document | Privilege
Log | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] | p. 50 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|---------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 06961 | 8/11/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT LIST | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] | | p. 54 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 03190 | 10/14/09 | [REDACTED]
Edwards | Confidential
Source | Additional
Information re;
Epstein Strategies | W/P Priv.; not reasonably
calculated to lead to
discovery of admissible
evidence | + +| | JAFFE'S FEBRU | +|-------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | Date From | +| 03190 | 10/1 Confidential Source O dwards EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBE | +| No. | Date | +| 203 | 10/14/09 E-mail from 9:02 a.m. (03189) | + +| | | EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017, EXHIBIT UST | | | +|-----|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----|---------------| +| No. | Date | Document | | Privilege Log | +| 203 | 10/14/09 | | | | +| | E-mail from 9:02 a.m. (03189) | to | J. | p. 54 | + +| | | JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | +|-------|----------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date | To | From | Description | Objection | +| 03189 | 10/14/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Additional Information Re: Epstein Strategies | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +| No. | Date | | Document | | | P liege | +|-----|-----------|-------------|----------|----|-------|---------| +| 208 | 10/20/09 | | | | | | +| | 1:01 p.m. | E-mail from | Rush to | J. | (0143 | p. 52 | + +| JAFFE'S FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PRIVILEGE LOG | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Date | To | From | Description | Objection | | +| 01433 | 10/20/09 | [REDACTED] | Confidential Source | Additional Information Re: Epstein Molestations | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence | + +# EXHIBIT J + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; +██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS + +DATE TAKEN: Thursday, March 8th, 2018 +TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D +West Palm Beach, Florida +BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Elaine V. ██████████ +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 471-2995 + +APPEARANCES: + +For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE +By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE + +For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: + +SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & +SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE +By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE +By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE + +For Non-Parties L.M., E.W. & Jane Doe + +HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. +10 West Broadway, Suite 400 +Salt Lake City, UT 84101 +By PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQUIRE + +For Jeffrey Epstein: + +ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. +250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE + +1 MR. SCAROLA: That is correct. The Conrad +2 Scherer firm was involved in that litigation, and +3 the Conrad Scherer firm was also interested in +4 getting to take a look at whatever relevant e-mails +5 might have been in the hands of the bankruptcy +6 trustee, and then got turned over to us. + +7 Well, there were direct negotiations in which +8 I was a personal participant with the lawyers for +9 Conrad Scherer, and an agreement was reached with +10 the lawyers for Conrad Scherer because, as we have +11 told every judge before whom we have appeared with +12 regard to these matters, we're not attempting to +13 hide anything. (You want to conduct an in-camera +14 (inspection) (we want you to conduct an in-camera +15 (inspection because it will confirm that we're not +16 attempting to hide anything.) + +17 We will turn over anything that you consider +18 appropriate for us to turn over. But we have no +19 ability to waive our client's attorney-client +20 privilege, your Honor, and some of these e-mails +21 clearly contain information that originated with +22 clients. And we are in the midst at this point of +23 still-pending litigation, and it is important for +24 us to protect our work product privilege as well. +25 Some of that litigation is still ongoing right now. + +1 that was not in the hands of Mr. Epstein's lawyers +2 since 2009, whenever this all came to fruition, +3 then I would say we'd have to take a different +4 approach. But the very nature of the documents +5 that we're talking about -- again, rightly or +6 wrongly held -- were in fact held by Fowler White, +7 Epstein's counsel, at an incredible crucial time in +8 this process; and that being in and around 2010, +9 when the Rothstein firm imploded, when these +10 e-mails were apparently confiscated, when somebody +11 made the decision that instead of [REDACTED] paying for +12 the copy costs, they be handed over to [REDACTED] +13 [REDACTED]. And if I have a bit of an incredulous tone +14 to that statement, it's probably purposeful. + +15 But the fact remains, Mr. Link, that these +16 materials were in the hands of Epstein's attorneys +17 from the inception of the issue itself. And to now +18 come to the Court with not five pages of documents +19 to look at, but 27,000, or whatever that number +20 is -- it escapes me because of its shear mass -- is +21 impossible and is not going to be countenanced +22 here. + +23 (And I understand what you're going to tell me +24 because I've gotten a flavor for some of these +25 documents that have been provided. + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir, + +THE COURT: (And that is that they are +(detrimental to the position taken by Mr. ( +(and that they are helpful to the position taken by +(Mr. Epstein. + +The issue, though, is one of whether the +protocol and the orderly administration of justice +is going to be forsaken notwithstanding also the +aspect of privilege and the sanctity of privileged +communications, whether all of those considerations +are going to be thrown out when balanced against +material that has been in the hands of +Mr. Epstein's lawyers from day one. And I, for +one, am not going to sacrifice protocol over what +may or may not be, number one, privileged, and if +not privileged, certainly late disclosed +documentation of a massive nature. + +Should the amount of documentation be a +determinative factor in a court's analysis in this +context, based upon 35 years of compound +experience, bench and bar, and a little bit more +now than half the bench, I do not believe that +the orderly administration of justice should be +countenanced and should be disruptive. Should be +disruptive. + +# EXHIBIT K + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. + +/ + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +### MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN1CO EMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTION\$cCN STS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF + +Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Le C Jaffe"), through counsel, hereby moves this honorable Court for an O rcl\ r Cause Why and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Cont Cu rt, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Approp and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +### UCTION + +As the Court will recall f idhs litigation in this matter, Jeffrey Epstein is a convicted sex offender who has been sued dozens of victims for sexual abuse of children. In the course of the above-capti c ired blirdt ptcy proceedings, in 2010, Epstein served a broad subpoena attempting to Ma usands of attorney communications by Jaffe attorney J. o while previously employed as an attorney at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA") h l represented a number of Epstein's victims in their civil suits against Epstein. Jaffe sought to have Epstein bear the costs of copying and stamping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel attorneys at the law firm of of the materials and return them to Burnett, P.A. ea a —would make a copy Jaffe. Because of Jaffe's obvious concern that + +Epstein or his legal counsel might misappropriate these documents while in their physical possession for the limited purpose of copying and numbering them, this Court specifically ordered that `= will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers." [DE 1194]. To ensure compliance with its order in olving the transmission of highly sensitive materials, this Court specifically added an enforcer rovision: f the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdietio sanctions in favor "Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images oc:5 of= Brad or his client." [DE 1194]. + +Remarkably, in clear and intentional defiance of t s discovered that indeed retained a co e nfidential materials at issue—and those materials have now been passed alon S t 's current set of lawyers, as well as to Epstein personally. Not to put too fine hat it, Epstein and his lawyers at c appear to have misappropriated f nfidential documents, which include sensitive and attorney-client protected comm i bout Epstein's sex abuse victims, and those documents to this day remain in the on of the victims' sexual abuser, Epstein. order, Jaffe recently + +s Court to enter an order to show cause, to allow appropriate discovery into the ap sconduct, and to ultimately enter sanctions and costs as may be appropriate. + +### HISTORICAL BACKGROUND + +While information surrounding the apparent misappropriation of privileged documents is continuing to be revealed, it appears that the following facts cannot be reasonably contested by or Epstein and, should any of them be contested, Jaffe requests an evidentiary hearing to prove them: + +1. From the 1990s through the 2000s, billionaire Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused dozens of then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Jaffe attorney J. in their civil suits against Epstein. [DE 1120]. + +2. filed the three sexual abuse lawsuits against Epstein in 2008 while a sole practitioner before taking the cases with him while was employed at m April 2009 through the firm's implosion in November 2009. + +3. In late 2009, Epstein sued for purportedly representing his clients who were Epstein's sex abuse victims. Jeffrey Epst • . Rothstein, J. and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for 1 c07 ch County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "t Irki awsuit"). + +4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein sery ena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("RRA") Bankru Trus Howard Stettin, seeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which includ representation of the sex abuse is from attorney hile at RRA. [DE 807]. related to + +5. On May Production Prot identify d Order this Court entered an Order approving a proposed Document ing the process that the RRA Bankruptcy Trustee would use to responsive to (among other requests) Epstein's subpoena. [DE 672]. The this Court with jurisdiction over all discovery sought from the RRA Trustee. + +6. On August 13, 2010, this Court appointed former Broward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney as Special =, who was directed to work with counsel for the Trustee to obtain documents responsive to the subpoena served upon the Trustee by Jeffrey Epstein. Specifically, the Special was to: "(i) review all electronically stored information ("ESI") and other + +11. The Court, recognizing the trust Jaffe was being forced to place in the adversary lawyers to perform the copying and numbering without stealing the materials, specifically ordered, a w ill not retain any copies of the documents contained on + +documents in the Trustee's possession, including Qtask' data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., and Brad and other current or former clients of =, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law." [DE 888]. + +7. On September 20, 2010, Special Carney moved for cl n of this Court's order, suggesting that Jaffe be permitted the opportunity to themselves in order to determine the applicability of privileges. [DE 10 3 e documents + +8. On October 15, 2010, this Court amended [DE 8 to re the RRA Trustee to provide the emails at issue to Jaffe and requestin t er Jaffe prepare the privilege log. [DE1068]. + +9. On November 2, 2010, L.M. id /4 . fi.1led a Motion requesting that Epstein, the party seeking the discovery, bear the ' ing e and other reasonable costs and attorney's fees associated with his discovery t E 1120]. + +10. On November 3 201 , this Court entered an Agreed Order directing the law firm of Burnett, print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with num dded, d provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special and an idenh to Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman ("= Jaffe"). The orneys were to then use their set to create its privilege log. [DE 1194]. + +&#x27; Qtask was an internal firm electronic communication platform.

the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers. Should it be determined that IM or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or othenvise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of=, Brad or his client" [DE 1194].

  • Jaffe.
  • 12. On December 13, 2010, 27,542 stamped documents were pm ilk to
  • 13. On January 25, 2011, Jaffe provided Epstein -17Vitnli 8,4 8 pages of nonprivileged emails.
  • 14. On January 26, 2011, Jaffe servedjj sjelhjiith a privilege log governing the remainder of the documents. IS. On February 15, 2011, Epstei Se\ d the privilege log as insufficient before this Court. [DE 1442].
  • 16. On February 23, 2 Jaffe provided Epstein with an additional 12,711 pages of emails,2 and an lege Log containing 159 pages identifying the remaining 6,471 pages of emails co privileged information that were not being produced.
  • 17. 2011, Special Carney filed his Interim Report before this Court confi at of the more than 27,000 pages of emails, all documents had been released to Epsk t to confidentiality provisions, with the exception of the documents identified on

2 The 12,711 pages of documents were divided into two separate categories respectively labeled "attorneys eyes only" and = Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails." Two boxes of "attorneys eyes only" documents were produced containing 1,829 pages of documents in the first box andapages of documents in the second box, totaling 5,027 pages. Two additional boxes of Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails" were also produced containing 3,804 pages of documents in the first box and 3,880 pages of documents in the second box, totaling 7,684 pages.

Jaffe's 159-page privilege log of February 23, 2011, which documents were not subject to discovery. [DE 1570].

18. In 2012, additional litigation ensued regarding some of the documents in state court in the Epstein lawsuit against n

19. To date, 21,282 pages of emails have been permissibly and lawfully rovided to Epstein. Consequently, 6,471 pages of emails have never been provided to be it Epstein and his lawyers as they are protected by various privileges including atto t privilege and work product privilege and remain on the privilege log.

RECENT EVENTS

20. On November 1, 2017, the law firm of Li Nt cli)R bach, P.A. entered a Notice of Appearance in the Epstein lawsuit, pending befo t Siraws s " nald Hafele (the successor to Judge ). As it has evolved, Epstein's lawsuit a s iis , was dismissed and the lawsuit now

3 Specifically, on A r, 101 d id F. (presiding over the Epstein lawsuit) entered an Order requiring to rodu any non-privileged documents identified in paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compe Amend Protective Order, which s., cally only included emails relating to news re or the media. On May 7, 2012, Judge = entered an Order on Plaintiff Jeffrey Eps in's of on toal Production of Documents from Defendant and for tions ating, ' shall within 30 days of the date of this order file a more co ilege log. The Court finds the privilege log is insufficient on its face and does not com e requirements of F.R.C.P. 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp. v. M, 799 So. 2d 33 DCA 2001 In all other respects the Motion is denied at this time."

8, 2012, provided Etvih 163 pages of emails pursuant to Judge A 10 Order. On Ma 2012, filed a Motion for Clarification of Recent Discovery Orders before Judge On August 17, 2012, Judge granted Motion for Clarification and vacated its Order of May 12012 without prejudice upholding February 23, 2011 Privilege Log and requiring only to file written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's 110, 2012 Order.

Ultimately, following a summary iudgment motion by Epstein dropped his lawsuit• currently pending before Judge successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place.

involves a malicious prosecution claim brought by against Jeffrey Epstein. alleges that Epstein sued him, with malice and without probable cause, for representing then-minor girls sexually abused by Epstein, including L.M.

21. On March 2, 2018, Epstein, through counsel Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach, Epstein filed Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Filing of Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidenc in Epstein's 353-page filing were at least 49 privileged emails spanning over 1 various privileges pursuant to the privilege log and that we ja ;) ver fully permitted to be provided to Epstein or retained by his lawyers. Epstein a'9 e p only actual copies of various emails, but also provided a purported "summary" f \e i which included specific quotations from communications over which attorney; repeatedly asserted, by Jaffe, context and substantially misleadi subsequent filings in court p at are subject to lege and other protections had been L.M. Epstein also provided a wholly out-ofof what he believed the emails demonstrated. In , he has continued to reference the content of privileged documents and mischaracl their significance in the pending state court malicious prosecution case.

22., On arch 5, 2018, filed his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Suppl xhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Jaffe's Privilege Log.

23. On March 7, 2018, L.M. and two other minor girls Epstein had sexually abused, E.W. and Jane Doe, filed an emergency motion to intervene and an emergency motion to join

motion to strike. The three victims alleged that Epstein's recent filing disclosed their protected attorney-client communications.

24. On March 7, 2018, counsel for Epstein delivered a flash drive to counsel for "which duplicates the disc we located in files." Letter of transmittal attached hereto as Exhibit A. The subject flash drive contained three separate PDF files respectively titled: (1) a containing 8,507 pages of emai "Epstein Searches.pdf' containing 17,348 pages of emails; and (3) "Scott Rothstei staining 1,687 pages of emails ("subject documents"). Notably, the flash drive indi • e three PDF files had been last "modified" on December 8, 2010, a mere nine da c 5 erZRfs Court ordered to take very limited possession of the subject docu Vt i t nt and stamp them, and then not to retain any copies. This was also a short fore fore the stamped documents were delivered to Jaffe on December

25. On March 7, 2018, cou for pstein also provided a sworn affidavit from certified paralegal Tina L. t had obtained these materials from files. Specifically, Ms. Campb I aft ed under oath that on January 10, 2018, she had reviewed approximately 36 boxes o Epstein files at Miami, Florida offices. During that revie lectro is discs found in the files were marked for review, but the contents it reviewed. Affidavit attached hereto as Exhibit B. On February 1, 2018, Link bach, P.A. received three boxes from the firm containing copies of the items that had been marked for reproduction including a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" handwritten in black sharpie. The disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" was not reviewed until February 25, 2018.

26. It is thus undisputed that a disk containing the privileged emails in question was in the possession of in early January 2018—a disc showing that it had last been modified on December 8, 2010.

27. On March 8, 2018, Judge I lafele held a hearing regarding the privileged communications. Counsel for Epstein, and the three victims at issue (L.M9 E.W., and Jane Doe) all appeared. Counsel for background as well as how communications in violation of this Court's order. Counsel for Eps began the hearing by explainii1 relevant had made and retained a cft to privileged ponded, arguing that they (i.e., Link & Rockenbach) had not improperly taken . i .. u nts from This argument led Judge Hafele to ask, "[t]he critical q I ll gh, is why did have these documents, why were they continued to e was it in violation either expressly or constructively as it relates to Judge Ray's e " 'ng Trans. at 32:10-14 (all portions of the March 8, 2018 hearing transcript ci rein attached hereto as Exhibit C).

28. Without offering I anation in response to the Court's inquiry, counsel for Epstein simply stated, "( k about because it is as clear as mud." Hearing Trans. at 35:6-7. 1 for Epstein further explained that "[w]hen these issues came up, we asked ease give us the original boxes. We got the original boxes and found the disc in a hat says J. Carney printing on it. That's it. That's all that's on this folder." Hearing at 45:11-15. Epstein's counsel then conjectured certain speculative scenarios,' but

4 Epstein's current legal counsel speculated that after a copy of the materials were provided to the Special = Judge Carney, that Judge Camey somehow turned around, contacted and gave the disk to them. Judge Hafele, however, summarily rejected this speculation, explaining that this would require believing that Judge Carne "a acted re jurist," was "somehow engaged in some type of ex parte communications with " Hearing Trans. at 44:19-25.

ultimately admitted "I wasn't there. I can't tell you what a IM did...." Hearing Trans. at 45:23-24.

29. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein revealed that Epstein personally had retained copies of the confidential materials, in contravention of the November 30, 2011 Order. Hearing Trans. at 64:7-8 (counsel for Epstein admits that copies of the documents, have been provided "within my law firm, and my client."). When further asked, "H in been provided with copies of the documents or the contents of these privileg ts?," counsel for Epstein replied, "I just said my client. My law firm and my client. say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it." Hearing Trans. 64:14-19.

t 30. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein ( kenbach) also revealed that was disclaiming any memory of th \ s ces surrounding the creation and retention of the disc: "We have reached out c t M. They have no memory of it." Hearing Trans. at 35:15-21.

31. Epstein's claim t t i"..r circumstances led counsel for war fo respond that it was difficult to believe had no records regarding the Four Honor knows very well that is a very large law firm that keeps me records with regard to the services they render. And the concept that it is im to reconstruct through those time records what was received, when it was recciv had "no memory" of the surrounding it was reviewed, what happened with it, who was informed of what was happening with it, quite frankly, is inconceivable to me." Hearing Trans. at 60:8-19.

32. Judge Hafele responded in agreement by noting his surprise that was not explaining what had happened: "And that's a good point. What I was going to point out earlier ... is that I would have expected certainly in deference to the fact that Mr. Epstein was a client of

that someone from would have had the ability to weigh in somehow as to these critical issues. Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and why they had access and kept these records in their possession in light of that [bankruptcy] court order and in light of this ongoing litigation. And as a matter of respect to Mr. Epstein and his ongoing legal team, to have made some type of affit e steps to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of . earing Trans. at 60:20-61:14.

33. Counsel for victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe asRed Judge Hafele to order to explain who they had distributed the sit de materials to. Judge Hafele indicated that, in light of withdrawal SP e in front of him, he did not have "that ability" to enter such an order directed a 'en. Hearing Trans. at 79:25-80:1.

34. Based on the foregoing f ove he past seven years, has been in possession of a disc containing o pages of documents-6,74I pages of which were privileged materials never la lly r ived by them—that they were specifically ordered not to retain in any format. Th disc in question had the exact number of documents copied to it that pied at the direction of this Court on November 30, 2010. And, the subject disc was last a mere nine days after this Court ordered to copy, stamp, , and permanently destroy the materials from their internal system. This was also a short five days before the final Jaffe by stamped documents were delivered in hard copy to on December 13, 2010—a date after which had no lawful reason to retain the subject documents in any format whatsoever.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Based on the egregious conduct of Epstein and his attorneys, the exact fear contemplated by the parties, the Special =, and this Court when the November 30, 2010 order was entered, has alarmingly come to fruition. Despite obligations as officers of this Court to follow a specifically delineated procedure designed to protect highly confidential and privilege materials, has apparently deliberately copied and retained highly sensitive ntial and privileged materials for over seven years. Recently, these materials disclosed to additional counsel for Epstein and these materials remain in the poss stein personally. The misappropriation of this information has caused irreparabl tein's current counsel, Link & Rockenbach have also now filed privileged inf ist the public court file in the v. Epstein matter (although that filing Ss cfr e n placed under seal) and have repeatedly referenced the privileged content ppropriated documents in other filings. Specifically foreseeing the need to ens t its rlier order was complied with in full, this Court expressly retained jurisdiction to 'ons in the event of any breach. This Court should take steps to ensure that its ord 's co lied with in the future and to punish and remedy violations in the past.

thorough i docum ievcrs that the true extent of its damages can only be determined through a o the entire chain of custody detailing the whereabouts of the subject inception and including any person who has seen or been informed of the content of said documents. To that extent, an evidentiary hearing and corresponding discovery are essential, as complete determination of the breadth and degree of complicity by and Jeffrey Epstein, both jointly and severally, is imperative to the formulation of the appropriate sanctions in this matter. Jaffe has the right to inquire as to whether the subject documents

were downloaded into the system, whether they were disseminated to third parties, and ultimately when and how they ended up in the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Stated more succinctly, the sanctions here must be commensurate with the misconduct.

Specific ReliefSought

This Court previously entered an order directing that both and E stein were not to "retain[] images or copies of the subject documents on [their] computes erwise." [DE 1194]. In light of the clear violation of that order, Jaffes now pert s Court to enter an additional order as follows:

  • 1. and Epstein are directed within sev o e entry of this order to show cause as to why they should not be held in contemp s order, DE 1194.
  • 2. and Epstein (including all past and present legal counsel) are directed, within seven days of the entry of si• 1\tti r, provide to counsel for Jaffe all physical, electronic, and other informal • th possession concerning the copying, retention, and dissemination of the docum by DE 1194 (and any materials disclosing the contents of those documents), i (but not limited to) all information regarding the making, retention, and disseminat ese materials on and after December 8, 2010. This information shall include, but • of lim ed to, any electronic or other information showing the date on which copies were t u e authors of any such copies, emails or transmission of such copies, and any dis ference to such copies. Epstein (and all of his past and present legal counsel) shall also provide all correspondence and billing records related to the copying, retention, review, discussion, and dissemination of the subject documents, the stamping of the subject

5 This motion is filed on behalf of t is counsel's understanding that separate motions to the same effect will be filed shortly by Mr. and by three victims with privileged materials at issue, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe.

documents, or any other activity related to the November 30, 2011 Order from the day that the Epstein subpoena was issued on April 17, 2010 through the present.

3. and Epstein (including all of Epstein's past and present legal counsel) will provide to Jaffe within seven days of the entry of this order a listing of all persons or entities to whom the subject documents (or any information derived from the contents of the subject materials) have been viewed and distributed, as well as a certification that they have asked for return of the subject materials.

4. and Epstein and any other persons know tq1 av r possessed these materials, including Epstein's current counsel, shall allow neu alists appointed by this Court to search all computer servers, including back-up t d hard-drives, for designated search terms especially found within these privileg -SIN, While mandatory anyway, under a i n ' the circumstances Epstein and all past and 5tnr nscl, as well as anyone else known or believed to have ever possessed the ma Is s Id be strictly ordered to maintain all possible platforms that may contain such p v e Information to ensure there is no spoliation of the 7 11" evidence of the improper reten 'on, r view, dissemination or other use of these materials by any person or entity.

5. Couns reasonably or disc Jaffe is permitted to obtain deposition testimony of all persons to have knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the copying, retention, of the documents at issue in DE 1194.

6. An evidentiary show cause hearing will be held wherein Jaffe is afforded the opportunity to inquire into the facts and circumstances surrounding the wrongful retention and resulting dissemination of the subject privileged materials, in order for the aggrieved parties and the Court to learn of the full scope of the wrongdoing. Such inquiry should include, but not be

limited to, testimony from Special Robert Carney, Jeffrey Epstein, Attorney L. Ackerman, Attorney Lilly Ann M, Jack Goldberger, Tina Scott Link, Kara Rockenbach, and the currently unidentified attorneys that Mr. Link has represented are also working on this case on behalf of Epstein from the Gunster law firm.

7. Epstein will pay Jaffe reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses conpected with Jaffe's efforts to determine the circumstances surrounding the retention materials and to remedy any damage caused to Famer Jaffe or its clients release of the materials. of the tion, use or

8. Jaffe is permitted to seek further relief described above is completed. cns after the discovery

Authority to Entert ifictnal a Order

This Court's November 30, 2010 Ily noted that the Court was retaining jurisdiction to enforce compliance: "Sho 't be ermined that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject on its compute or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions f of=, Brad or his client." [DE 1194 at 2] (emphasis added). The t Dearly has power to now award sanctions and take all other steps necessary to ompli

Of c 1 ederal courts have the power, by statute, by rule, and by common law, to impo against recalcitrant lawyers and parties litigant. Carlucci v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 775 F.2d 1440, 1446 (11th Cir. 1985). Even absent explicit legislative enactment, deeply rooted in the common law tradition is the power of any court to "manage its affairs [which] necessarily includes the authority to impose reasonable and appropriate sanctions upon errant lawyers practicing before it." Id. at 1447. Federal courts have the inherent power to enforce compliance

with their lawful orders through civil contempt remedies. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins, 943 F.3d 1297. 1301 (11th Cir. 1991). Courts also have the inherent power to sanction a party for misconduct. v. Nasco, 501 U.S. 32, 42 (1991). As the Supreme Court stated in "[i]t has long been understood that certain implied powers must necessarily result to our courts of justice from the nature of their institution, powers which cannot be dispe sed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the exercise of all others". Id.

Before the Court uses its inherent contempt power, "[a] petitioner ' ] establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated [a] u er order." Chairs v. Burgess, 143 F.3d 1432. 1436 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting Unit , 858 F.2d 698. 700 (11th Cir. 1988)). Once such a prima facie showin ntempt has been made, the burden shifts to the contemnor to produce eviden cause hearing that the underlying order was not violated or that the violation w at 1436.The violation need not be will U.S. 187. 191 (1949) ("Since the intent the defendant did the p act."). Even inadvertent or partial non-compliance with orders of the Court consti \*vil contempt if the party has not in good faith made all reasonable efforts to comply es. 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir. 1984). an inability to comply. Chairs, 143F.3d sullpbrt a finding of civil contempt. McComb, 336 civil contempt] is remedial, it matters not with what

How c court finds the defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the in then the court may cite the defendant for criminal contempt." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (stating, "[a] court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as-( l) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; (2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in

their official transactions; (3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command)).6

The fundamental purpose behind contempt sanctions are twofold, (1) sanctions can coerce the contemnor into complying in the future with the Court's orders or (2) they can compensate the complainant for losses resulting from the contemnor's past noncompliance. Citronelle-Mobile, 943 F.2d at 1304. See also McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191 ,.47so EEOC v. Guardian Pools, Inc., 828 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1987); Perfect Fit Industri . cme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 56-57 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 73 (1 ct, the Court has "wide discretion to fashion an equitable remedy for con t th is appropriate to the circumstances." Guardian Pools, 828 F.2d at 1515. Acc c n States v. City of Miami, 195 F.3d 1292, 1298 (11th Cir. 1999). Such options incl i a oe we daily fine, a compensatory fin; attorney's fees, expenses to the aggrieved p S 1ills 44/, s " rcive incarceration. Citronelle-Mobile, 943 F.2d 1297.Courts have broad pow fas n an appropriate sanction, including anything from entry of monetary sanctio of a final judgment on the merits against a party demonstrated to have committ tfiji d upon the court. See Vargas v. Peitz, 901 F.Supp. 1572 (S.D. Fla. 1995).

Compen which "is Worke sane ICZ 4Vns generally include a fine payable to the petitioner the amount of y the extent of the actual loss." Id. (citing United States v. United Mine .S. 258, 303-04 (1947)). Compensatory sanctions also frequently include the payment of the complainant's attorney's fees in seeking the redress. Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 689 n. 14 (1978) ("[a]n equity court has the unquestioned power to award attorney's fees against a

6See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42, requiring that notice be provided in open court in an order to show cause before indirect criminal contempt can be imposed.

party who shows bad faith by delaying or disrupting the litigation or by hampering enforcement of a court order" and "[o]f course, fees can also be awarded as part of a civil contempt penalty"); Watkins, 943 F.2d at 1301, 1304 1301; Jaeger v. Massis, No. 00-7390. 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27908 (2d Cir. Nov. 3, 2000). Courts within the Eleventh Circuit have not hesitated to impose severe sanctions pursuant to their inherent powers, including cases where a party has cted in bad faith. See, e.g., In re Mroz, 65 F.3d 1567 (11th Cir. 1995).

In light of the Court's sweeping powers to secure compliance with • I•S Court should grant the relief sought by Jaffe above. There can be no doub t a facie showing of contempt has been made by clear and convincing evidence and Epstein were directed not to retain copies of privileged documents. T ited above show that apparently made—and indisputably retai y of the privileged documents. Sometime thereafter, Epstein also obtained a copy of the privileged documents and now numerous unauthorized people h hese ocuments and knowledge of their privileged content.

At the hearing surro tCding e confidential materials, Judge Hafele indicated his "respectful belief that owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and they ad access and kept these records in their possession in light of that [bankrupt c rder and in light of this ongoing litigation." Hearing Trans. at 61:5-9. M , has failed to come forward voluntarily. Accordingly, this Court should enter an order to show cause as to why they have not violated this Court's order. In light of Epstein's possession of the materials, he should be directed to show cause as well.

In addition, it is already clear that efforts to avoid responsibility for violating the Court's order are underway. Indeed, Link and Rockenbach has certified that instead of gathering,

cataloguing, and filing under seal all improperly acquired and retained privileged materials, it has directed their destruction, thereby impeding further investigation of the origin of those materials. Accordingly, and Epstein (including his legal counsel, past and present) should be ordered to provide all relevant discovery about how the violation occurred. To get to the bottom of this violation and be permitted to identify the necessary witnesses to be ed at the anticipated evidentiary hearing before this Court, Jaffe also seeks to depose persons who appear to be in the chain of custody of the improperly copied and retaj als.

Because it is clear that Jaffe is going to have to bear of time and effort in responding to distribution of privileged materials, the Court should aw and his legal counsel have caused these problem Ss financial consequences. Finally, because the • a S€ this Court's order appears to be evolving and on-going, Jaffe requests 1 to supplemental sanctions and remedies after discovery on the violation has bee e urdens, in terms and Epstein) i ' • ro copying, retention, and ' fees and expenses. Epstein third parties should not bear the

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE, Jaffe respectfully requests that this Court enter an order to and Epst s se why they should not be held in contempt of court, allowing discovery an entiary hearing on the circumstances surrounding the improper copying, retentt istribution of privileged materials, and allowing Jaffe to seek such other sanctions and remedies as may be appropriate following discovery on these matters. A proposed order to this effect is attached.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(D), Movant's counsel has contacted in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter without a hearing before bringing this motion. has failed to respond.

I HEREY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CWECF sub ribers, and by email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the attached service list this 19 f March, 2018.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the U istrict Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance wi a'' tonal qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

EDW INGER LLC

By:— /s/ Bradley .1. FLBN 542075 Brittany N. FLBN 118247 25 Wards Pottinger LW N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)424-2822

Ci

Attorn for=, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 19, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certified that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

CO X

Brad s

SERVICE LIST

L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976

Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 16 0 David P. Vitale, sq. Florida Bar N Attorney E- ears law. •m; and mmccann®searcylaw.com Primary arolateam®searcylaw.com Sears Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Pal h Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J.

Special

Phil Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esq. njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington &Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J.

Jay Howell, Esq. Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): jay®jayhowell.com 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 (904) 680-1234

Paul G. Cassell, Esq. S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu s , Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe ?

Judge Robert Carney 2281 Saratoga Ln West Palm Beach, FL 33409 954-258-9573 rbcarnev3egmail.com I f,' (se

+o

EXHIBIT L

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

FLW 18 MAR 20 PM 1241 USBCSDF-FTL

f.T

IN RE:

CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.

CHAPTER 11

JOINDER IN MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

[REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of his joinder in the motion filed on behalf of [REDACTED]. Jaffe for issuance of an order to show cause why Jeffrey Epstein and [REDACTED] should not be held in contempt of court. [REDACTED] adopts all arguments and requests for relief asserted in the referenced motion

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CME/ECF subscribers, this 19th day of March, 2018.

[Handwritten signature of John Scarola]

JOHN SCAROLA
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and
mmccann@searcylaw.com
Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: 561-383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

NOT ACCEPTED FILED

EXHIBIT M

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR

L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE'S JOINDER IN MOTION FOR 0 O SHOW CAUSE AND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANG ON D COSTS FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF

Sexual assault victims L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (he er e Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously and through undersigned counsel, havi y moved to intervene in this action, now file this joinder in Jaffe's Motio Ns e of an Order to Show Cause Why and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not il lic, Discovery, to ns ofCourt, to Permit Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for A priate Relief [DE 6323]. In addition, the Victims seek addi i dies as follows.

UAL BACKGROUND

To avoid duplicat t dings, the Victims simply adopt, as if set forth in full herein, the factual recitation de by Jaffe's earlier motion for an order to show cause. [DE 6323 at 1-11.] Th would also direct the Court to their contemporaneously filed motion to intery establishes that they have a direct, substantial, and protectable interest in their attorney-client protected materials. These pleadings demonstrate that While and Epstein have directly violated an order of this Court [DE 1194], which prohibited them from retaining and distributing copies of attorney-client protected materials of the three victims.

RELIEF REOUESTED

The Victims join in and seek, on their own behalves, all of the relief previously requested by Jaffee. [DE 6323 at 13-15].

In addition, the victims seek the following relief, not specifically sought by Jaffe.

1. A letter written and signed by both and Jeffrey Epstein, and rovided to the VZictims, to the following effect: "To Whom It May Concern: The docume ed on the attached list [insert attachment] were impermissibly retained by the under& ed in violation of an order from U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the Bankru ourt for the Southern District of Florida. See DE 1194, In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt A ., o. 09-34791-RBR. If you are in possession of any of the attached documents uence of a violation of the order, you are requested to promptly it to the to you." \AS".141 return has provided a copy of this letter

2. Discovery regarding the distri • n o e impermissible retained materials, in the form of twenty interrogatories, twenty production, and twenty requests for admission, to be answered by: (1) Jeffrey Ep in; 2 any attorney, paralegal, other law firm employee or consultant, or expert witn has been involved in the representation of Epstein in the abovecaptioned matter Eps in v. No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Cir. Ct. of the 15th Jud. Cir. m Beach County, Fla.).

+ra te letters of apology for each of the three victims, written by Epstein and all attorneys and staff found to have played a responsible role in the unauthorized retention and release of their privileged materials.

4. A referral from this Court to appropriate disciplinary authorities, including bar authorities, for any attorney found to have apparently violated ethical obligations in connection with the improper retention and subsequent distribution of the materials at issue.

5. Monetary sanctions, payable directly to each of the Victims by Epstein, in the amount of \$25,000 for each of the three victims (a total of \$75,000). After making payment,Epstein is permitted to seek reimbursement from any of his attorneys who may have been

A 6. An evidentiary hearing on the circumstances surrounding the vi • the Victims' right of confidentiality, and a finding of civil or criminal contempt with such additional sanctions as the Court may then find to be ,.4 ; ppropriate, along

7. Reasonable attorneys' fees for the Victims f a y ey time, costs, and expenses as a result of the improper retention and su dot.t . stribution of the materials at issue. it.

AUTHORITY FOR THE ifc 0 AWARD RELIEF

This Court's previous order 11 specifically indicated that the Court was "retain[ing] jurisdiction" to impo s. In addition, the Court has authority to award sanctions, for all the reasons e by Jaffe in its memorandum [DE6323 at 15-19], which authority the Victi p specifically rely upon here.

CONCLUSION

For a fo going reasons, the Court should grant the three Victims' the relief requested above, g joinder in Jaffe's motion for sanctions and their own sanctions and other relief as described above.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(D), Movant's counsel has contacted Jaffe and before bringing this motion. in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter without a hearing Jaffe supports the Victims' motion. has been

contacted via email on March 19, 2018, about the Victims' motion and has thus far failed to respond.

I HEREY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CWECF subscribers, and by email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the attached service list this 30th da of March, 2018. 4.....\ ,

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United htos) \*ct Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the Ai qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

+6s

SHAPIROcc

8551 Wok • Boulevard

Suite

P1 n, Ft ;ids 33322

. (954) 315-1157

/s /"Peter E. Shapiro

E. Shapiro

orida Bar No. 615551

pshapiro@shapirolawpa.com

and

Paul G. Caccell, Esq.

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

332 S. University St.

Salt Lake City, UT 84112

(above for address purposes only)

Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu

Pro Hac Vice Motion Filed Contemporaneously

Attorneys for Intervenors L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 30, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certified that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

SEIZV10E LIST

J. kan Na Pottinger LLC Britt an 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 brad@eplIc.com brittany®eptcom

Alk

Attorneys forM Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West CY 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976

re%

a O

C)

Jack A. Goldber sq jgoldberger® ; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury G d. Weiss, P.A. 250 Aus ue S, Suite 1400 West h, FL 33401 Phone: (5 659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691

Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linkrocklaw.com Kara@linhocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Bouleva Suite West 301 Palm Beach, FL 33401 C Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 'cr y

Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 115179

Attorney E-Mails: jsx@searcylaw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451

Attorneys for J.

Judge Robert Carney 2281 Saratoga Ln 4ohlk West Palm Beach, FL 33409 rbcamey3®gmail.com CO 954-258-9573

N

Special

CARLTON JORDEN BURT, P.A. Niall T. McLachlan, Esq. 100 SE 2od Street, Suite 4200 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: 305-530-0050 Facsimile: 305-530-0055 Primary Email: nmclachlan@cfjblaw.com Secondary Email: cauzmanectiblaw.com miaecf®cfdom.net

Counsel for +0

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c175dfd7f1c581c217f106f8759963082062658f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397/EFTA02766397.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,15860 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766397.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 294, + "chars": 752605, + "elapsed_seconds": 137.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF l' E EIN'S \nSUPPLEMENT' TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DEC\n'\n. RELEVANCE AND NON-\nPRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND W ECIFIC REOUEST FOR IN \nCAMERA REVIEW TO DETERMINE RELEV PPLICABILITY AND/OR \nWAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILE Alsp 'ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT \nArt WITH REGARD TO S \\ litICUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 538.4718017578125, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 538.4718017578125, + 398.60595703125 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 398.60595703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PREFACE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.788, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 337.1017761230469, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 337.1017761230469, + 77.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 274.788, + 77.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 356.9588623046875, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 356.9588623046875, + 491.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 491.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIS COURT MUST FI NO WORK-PRODUCT \nPROTECTION EX cSTS ist.O THAT IT WAS WAIVED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 463.81353759765625, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 463.81353759765625, + 422.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 422.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Expressly Wai rjt roduct Objections for All but New and Ongoing \nCases against Epstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 544.6285400390625, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 544.6285400390625, + 463.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 463.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Work-Product Protection Was Waived by Sharing with Third Parties \u2014 as \nAdmittedly Did With Razorback", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 539.784, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 539.784, + 394.863037109375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 394.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. Work-Product Protection Was Waived bv=l1 Issue Injection", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 441.25372314453125, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 441.25372314453125, + 77.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 77.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. Deceptive Concea e 47 E-mails on a Legally Deficient Privilege Log \nin Violation of Florida gy 41f, vil Procedure. Binding Precedent and the Express \nOrders of this Court is turtlipilVaiver", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 544.3385620117188, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 544.3385620117188, + 463.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 463.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE EXISTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.5704345703125, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 437.5704345703125, + 132.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 132.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN CAMERA REVIEW IS MANDATED BY LAW. WAS AGREED TO BY THE \nPARTIES AND IS APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 516.4710693359375, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 516.4710693359375, + 91.10302734375 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 91.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "URISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT \nIS NOT AN ISSUE BEFORE THIS COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 530.55 + ], + [ + 458.1947937011719, + 530.55 + ], + [ + 458.1947937011719, + 560.0500030517578 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 560.0500030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C ss ONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.60000610351562, + 448.74 + ], + [ + 349.05975341796875, + 448.74 + ], + [ + 349.05975341796875, + 463.863037109375 + ], + [ + 221.60000610351562, + 463.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 200.88 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 200.88 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 215.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 215.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 77.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 77.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION \nFOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED \nNATURE OF DOCUMENTS. ETC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 494.552001953125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 494.552001953125, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.1603088378906, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.1603088378906, + 85.8446044921875 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 85.8446044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "47 DOCUMENTS FROM EPSTEIN'S MARCH 5. 2018. CLERK'S TRIAL EXHIBIT \nLIST THAT EPSTEIN IS SEEKING AN IN CAMERA REVIEW OF COMPARED TO \nPRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 533.3329467773438, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 533.3329467773438, + 141.3446044921875 + ], + [ + 78.94800000000001, + 141.3446044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "U.S. District Court \nSouthern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) \nCIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 470.3445129394531, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 470.3445129394531, + 134.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 134.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Petitioner", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 112.36360168457031, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 112.36360168457031, + 304.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 56.916000000000004, + 304.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Respondent", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 696.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 119.39688110351562, + 696.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 119.39688110351562, + 711.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 711.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 398.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE . \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.0, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.139404296875, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.139404296875, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON OUSTANDING DISCOVERY OTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 442.6878662109375, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 442.6878662109375, + 338.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 338.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 157.95 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flab.uscourts\u2022S0v", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 417.2999572753906, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 417.2999572753906, + 141.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 141.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "rivile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.18072509765625, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.18072509765625, + 77.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 77.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 78.875 + ], + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 78.875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 76.472 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 76.472 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 79.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 79.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.584, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.73486328125, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.73486328125, + 77.714111328125 + ], + [ + 298.584, + 77.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane, weissing, ristos rsi Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 287.496, + 77.46331787109375 + ], + [ + 533.5592041015625, + 77.46331787109375 + ], + [ + 533.5592041015625, + 95.3994140625 + ], + [ + 287.496, + 95.3994140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer,Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards.Fistos &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.312, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 531.2080078125, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 531.2080078125, + 94.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 246.312, + 94.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.205, + 38.674 + ], + [ + 497.9148254394531, + 38.674 + ], + [ + 497.9148254394531, + 54.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 317.205, + 54.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing. \ni Pistos ist Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 55.158 + ], + [ + 551.1366577148438, + 55.158 + ], + [ + 551.1366577148438, + 71.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 71.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer. Jaffe. Weissing,Edwards. Fistos &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.814, + 38.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 551.9862670898438, + 38.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 551.9862670898438, + 71.66650390625 + ], + [ + 262.814, + 71.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Priv I e Lo \u2014Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.806, + 36.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 496.356201171875, + 36.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 496.356201171875, + 53.2864990234375 + ], + [ + 316.806, + 53.2864990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "_,,Jaffe, Weissint Fistes &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.42999267578125, + 53.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 549.5037841796875, + 53.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 549.5037841796875, + 70.16650390625 + ], + [ + 264.42999267578125, + 70.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.41, + 41.144999999999996 + ], + [ + 493.69500000000005, + 41.144999999999996 + ], + [ + 493.69500000000005, + 56.337 + ], + [ + 316.41, + 56.337 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.6, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 494.662, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 494.662, + 53.172 + ], + [ + 317.6, + 53.172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.968, + 38.43 + ], + [ + 504.1285400390625, + 38.43 + ], + [ + 504.1285400390625, + 56.87286376953125 + ], + [ + 319.968, + 56.87286376953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pith/Ileke Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.012, + 39.815999999999995 + ], + [ + 494.106201171875, + 39.815999999999995 + ], + [ + 494.106201171875, + 57.0364990234375 + ], + [ + 316.012, + 57.0364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 56.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 547.4967651367188, + 56.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 547.4967651367188, + 73.16650390625 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 73.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer.Jaffe.Weissing,Edwards. Mins&LehrmaD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.735, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 553.6378784179688, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 553.6378784179688, + 75.7965087890625 + ], + [ + 264.735, + 75.7965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.40000000000003, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 497.5, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 497.5, + 55.879999999999995 + ], + [ + 318.40000000000003, + 55.879999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.012, + 41.711999999999996 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 41.711999999999996 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 56.879999999999995 + ], + [ + 316.012, + 56.879999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer. Jaffe, Weissin Edwards.Fistos&Leh n", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.814, + 43.677 + ], + [ + 551.3688354492188, + 43.677 + ], + [ + 551.3688354492188, + 77.16650390625 + ], + [ + 262.814, + 77.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer.Jaffe. Weissing.Edwards.Fistos& Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.5, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 552.7209999999999, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 552.7209999999999, + 78.27197265625 + ], + [ + 265.5, + 78.27197265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.394, + 41.145 + ], + [ + 500.5155029296875, + 41.145 + ], + [ + 500.5155029296875, + 58.0364990234375 + ], + [ + 318.394, + 58.0364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.41, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 497.0096435546875, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 497.0096435546875, + 54.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 316.41, + 54.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer, Jane, weissing, towarcis, ristos a MUIR-TIM]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.402, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.036, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.036, + 75.2041015625 + ], + [ + 264.402, + 75.2041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.21799999999996, + 44.31 + ], + [ + 493.074, + 44.31 + ], + [ + 493.074, + 58.869 + ], + [ + 315.21799999999996, + 58.869 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissine, Pistos & Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.226, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 549.2496337890625, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 549.2496337890625, + 77.96759033203125 + ], + [ + 261.226, + 77.96759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.394, + 44.943 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 44.943 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 318.394, + 60.135000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.235, + 43.539 + ], + [ + 497.1923828125, + 43.539 + ], + [ + 497.1923828125, + 60.53656005859375 + ], + [ + 313.235, + 60.53656005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a affe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.725, + 54.625 + ], + [ + 550.8562622070312, + 54.625 + ], + [ + 550.8562622070312, + 83.8499755859375 + ], + [ + 257.725, + 83.8499755859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.464, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 492.51214599609375, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 492.51214599609375, + 62.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 310.464, + 62.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe. WeissinJT. Fis os 8 Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 80.391 + ], + [ + 533.8356323242188, + 80.391 + ], + [ + 533.8356323242188, + 97.09759521484375 + ], + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 97.09759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.623, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 532.1030000000001, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 532.1030000000001, + 92.90399999999998 + ], + [ + 246.623, + 92.90399999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 80.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 80.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Low Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 480.4665222167969, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 480.4665222167969, + 78.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 78.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 79.41650390625 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.41650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.1, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.30072021484375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.30072021484375, + 82.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.1, + 82.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lox\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.657, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 478.9969999999999, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 478.9969999999999, + 78.228 + ], + [ + 303.657, + 78.228 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.8551025390625, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.8551025390625, + 80.214111328125 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 80.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 63.933 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 81.676513671875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 81.676513671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.56, + 80.391 + ], + [ + 533.9595336914062, + 80.391 + ], + [ + 533.9595336914062, + 98.5465087890625 + ], + [ + 292.56, + 98.5465087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \ntarmer, Jane. weissing. i ristos & Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.81, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 538.3292236328125, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 538.3292236328125, + 97.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 252.81, + 97.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 77.73599999999999 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 77.73599999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 484.2933349609375, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 484.2933349609375, + 82.2965087890625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 82.2965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.868, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 484.9083557128906, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 484.9083557128906, + 80.714111328125 + ], + [ + 304.868, + 80.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.8365173339844, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.8365173339844, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Los\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.3195495605469, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.3195495605469, + 80.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 80.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.098, + 62.81610107421875 + ], + [ + 483.606201171875, + 62.81610107421875 + ], + [ + 483.606201171875, + 78.7864990234375 + ], + [ + 306.098, + 78.7864990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ". Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, FiStOS aft Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.238, + 78.56610107421875 + ], + [ + 536.861, + 78.56610107421875 + ], + [ + 536.861, + 96.7864990234375 + ], + [ + 290.238, + 96.7864990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.305, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.35099999999994, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.35099999999994, + 76.351 + ], + [ + 305.305, + 76.351 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 482.37600000000003, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 482.37600000000003, + 79.5 + ], + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 79.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.4083557128906, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.4083557128906, + 76.214111328125 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 76.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege LoA \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 487.7655029296875, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 487.7655029296875, + 80.91650390625 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 80.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 485.6583557128906, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 485.6583557128906, + 79.9541015625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 79.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.9586181640625, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 486.9586181640625, + 79.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 79.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lola\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 486.8548583984375, + 77.4541015625 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 77.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 80.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 80.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.9761962890625, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.9761962890625, + 77.16650390625 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 77.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 63.19610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.9761962890625, + 63.19610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.9761962890625, + 79.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 79.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 486.0695495605469, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 486.0695495605469, + 80.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 80.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 77.2965087890625 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 77.2965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dat d 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 77.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 77.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 79.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 79.66998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 79.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 79.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PrivIle e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 57.51199999999999 + ], + [ + 484.7261962890625, + 57.51199999999999 + ], + [ + 484.7261962890625, + 73.91650390625 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 73.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.926, + 54.98399999999999 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 54.98399999999999 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 71.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.926, + 71.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.544, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 71.91650390625 + ], + [ + 302.544, + 71.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.7086181640625, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.7086181640625, + 77.2965087890625 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 77.2965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.43072509765625, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.43072509765625, + 74.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 74.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 54.81 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 54.81 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 71.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 71.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilefte Loft\u2014Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 72.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 72.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 482.8188171386719, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 482.8188171386719, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 481.76373291015625, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 481.76373291015625, + 78.4920654296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.4920654296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.8548583984375, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.8548583984375, + 77.714111328125 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 77.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 58.869 + ], + [ + 484.98486328125, + 58.869 + ], + [ + 484.98486328125, + 75.4541015625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 75.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1_ sane. weissing. tawaras. tistos a tenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.56, + 76.2730712890625 + ], + [ + 535.607666015625, + 76.2730712890625 + ], + [ + 535.607666015625, + 96.88592529296875 + ], + [ + 292.56, + 96.88592529296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 77.226 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 77.226 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.1875 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 63.1875 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1... Jaffe, Weissing. S Fistos Kt Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.08999633789062, + 79.6875 + ], + [ + 535.3866577148438, + 79.6875 + ], + [ + 535.3866577148438, + 95.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 250.08999633789062, + 95.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 484.9665222167969, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 484.9665222167969, + 76.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 76.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 483.8548583984375, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 483.8548583984375, + 80.4541015625 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 80.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 481.7261962890625, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 481.7261962890625, + 82.91650390625 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 82.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.133, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.5283508300781, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.5283508300781, + 76.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 302.133, + 76.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loft\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 79.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.99199999999996, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.99199999999996, + 74.97 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 74.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.77000000000004, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.77000000000004, + 76.59299999999999 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 76.59299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 58.59 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 58.59 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 76.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 76.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 80.01 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 80.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 479.98800000000006, + 64.236 + ], + [ + 479.98800000000006, + 77.592 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 77.592 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 482.3548583984375, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 482.3548583984375, + 78.0941162109375 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 78.0941162109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 485.7165222167969, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 485.7165222167969, + 77.800048828125 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 77.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.6995544433594, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.6995544433594, + 78.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "rivile e Log-- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.1396484375, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.1396484375, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilexe Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer, Jane, WeISSMR, PISCOS et Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.245, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 533.459228515625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 533.459228515625, + 95.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 247.245, + 95.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 479.385, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 479.385, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 479.7596435546875, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 479.7596435546875, + 77.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 77.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.11505126953125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.11505126953125, + 81.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 81.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 79.758 + ], + [ + 535.0692138671875, + 79.758 + ], + [ + 535.0692138671875, + 96.8240966796875 + ], + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 96.8240966796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.868, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 480.784, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 480.784, + 76.95599999999999 + ], + [ + 304.868, + 76.95599999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 481.9495544433594, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 481.9495544433594, + 77.800048828125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer. Jaffe. Weissi Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.623, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 533.9237670898438, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 533.9237670898438, + 94.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 246.623, + 94.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 77.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 77.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 77.348 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 77.348 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 480.1767578125, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 480.1767578125, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 76.714 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 76.714 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1:ivileeLo 3 \u2014", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 75.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 75.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege L \u2014 Date 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Los\u2014 Dated 2-234011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 485.0585632324219, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 485.0585632324219, + 80.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 80.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 74.061 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 74.061 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 76.08 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 76.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 484.2165222167969, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 484.2165222167969, + 79.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 79.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 SS:12-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.133, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 483.71209716796875, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 483.71209716796875, + 76.800048828125 + ], + [ + 302.133, + 76.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PrivlleQe Lox-Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer,Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.31599999999997, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 536.8380126953125, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 536.8380126953125, + 97.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 249.31599999999997, + 97.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 76.9541015625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 58.57611083984375 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 58.57611083984375 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 74.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 74.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e \u2014 Dat 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.6178894042969, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.6178894042969, + 79.0465087890625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 79.0465087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4665222167969, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4665222167969, + 79.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.1963806152344, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.1963806152344, + 79.4541015625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.276, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 482.985107421875, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 482.985107421875, + 81.964111328125 + ], + [ + 303.276, + 81.964111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.276, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 478.39599999999996, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 478.39599999999996, + 77.592 + ], + [ + 303.276, + 77.592 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 77.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 74.694 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 74.694 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loy \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.92, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 479.106201171875, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 479.106201171875, + 80.41650390625 + ], + [ + 298.92, + 80.41650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 186, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 76.08 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Low- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.276, + 63.50000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.1048583984375, + 63.50000000000001 + ], + [ + 483.1048583984375, + 79.714111328125 + ], + [ + 303.276, + 79.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 480.9586181640625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 480.9586181640625, + 78.66650390625 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 78.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe.Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.604, + 78.492 + ], + [ + 534.3562622070312, + 78.492 + ], + [ + 534.3562622070312, + 95.91650390625 + ], + [ + 290.604, + 95.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 189, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.5695495605469, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.5695495605469, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.60599999999994, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.60599999999994, + 74.576 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 74.576 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.547, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.0865173339844, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.0865173339844, + 78.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 300.547, + 78.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.1909484863281, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.1909484863281, + 81.176513671875 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 81.176513671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.547, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.59299999999996, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.59299999999996, + 76.351 + ], + [ + 300.547, + 76.351 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.25, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 475.608, + 65.714 + ], + [ + 475.608, + 81.02600000000001 + ], + [ + 299.25, + 81.02600000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 195, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 76.59299999999999 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 76.59299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.376, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 75.6 + ], + [ + 299.376, + 75.6 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.53759765625, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.53759765625, + 77.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 77.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 198, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 77.104 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 77.104 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 77.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 77.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.752, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 482.5331115722656, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 482.5331115722656, + 80.16650390625 + ], + [ + 301.752, + 80.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.752, + 62.31610107421875 + ], + [ + 481.6909484863281, + 62.31610107421875 + ], + [ + 481.6909484863281, + 77.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 301.752, + 77.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 202, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 74.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 74.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.547, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.05072021484375, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.05072021484375, + 78.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 300.547, + 78.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. ristos & Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.445, + 78.368 + ], + [ + 533.0780029296875, + 78.368 + ], + [ + 533.0780029296875, + 95.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 289.445, + 95.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "fiLdeLLL2. Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.3896484375, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.3896484375, + 81.74249267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 81.74249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \ntarmer, Jane, weissine. i ristos a cerirrnan", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 205, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.934, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 534.5311279296875, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 534.5311279296875, + 95.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 246.934, + 95.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 480.9761962890625, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 480.9761962890625, + 77.91650390625 + ], + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 77.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 77.66650390625 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 77.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.464, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 492.9267578125, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 492.9267578125, + 60.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 310.464, + 60.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014 23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 490.6820983886719, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 490.6820983886719, + 61.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 308.08799999999997, + 61.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.248, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.8979999999999, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.8979999999999, + 60.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 311.248, + 60.03999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 211, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.88, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 487.87199999999996, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 487.87199999999996, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 308.88, + 60.480000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.442, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3195495605469, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3195495605469, + 62.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 312.442, + 62.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 76.86 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 76.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 214, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 475.007, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 475.007, + 75.83999999999999 + ], + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 75.83999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 215, + "polygon": [ + [ + 296.95599999999996, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.0865173339844, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.0865173339844, + 79.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 296.95599999999996, + 79.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 216, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 473.82, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 473.82, + 77.226 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 77.226 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.92, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 474.61499999999995, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 474.61499999999995, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 298.92, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 472.628, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 472.628, + 77.104 + ], + [ + 297.375, + 77.104 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 219, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.544, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 79.7965087890625 + ], + [ + 298.544, + 79.7965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 220, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 473.82, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 473.82, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 221, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 78.66650390625 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 78.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log- Dated -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.792, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 480.20355224609375, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 480.20355224609375, + 75.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 297.792, + 75.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 223, + "polygon": [ + [ + 295.416, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.93072509765625, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.93072509765625, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 295.416, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 224, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 48.599999999999994 + ], + [ + 337.40802001953125, + 48.599999999999994 + ], + [ + 337.40802001953125, + 63.47406005859375 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 63.47406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY IN MAY 2012 THAT \nARE ON HIS FEBRUARY 23, 2011, PRIVILEGE LOG \nAND IDENTIFIED ON EPSTEIN'S NOVEMBER 16, 2017 EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 225, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 504.9779052734375, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 504.9779052734375, + 118.33056640625 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 118.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT J", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 254, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 255, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 407.592, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 407.592, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 362.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 256, + "polygon": [ + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 117.50399999999999, + 83.42999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT K", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 260, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 128.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 128.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE \nAND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN1CO EMPT OF \nCOURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTION$cCN STS, AND FOR \nOTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 542.6445922851562, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 542.6445922851562, + 293.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 293.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 261, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 356.9366149902344, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 356.9366149902344, + 431.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 431.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HISTORICAL BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 262, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 392.78338623046875, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 392.78338623046875, + 583.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 583.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECENT EVENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 266, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 360.2409362792969, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 360.2409362792969, + 307.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 307.1030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 272, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 71.4375 + ], + [ + 381.9764404296875, + 71.4375 + ], + [ + 381.9764404296875, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 230.11199999999997, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Specific ReliefSought", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 273, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.996, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 382.34906005859375, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 382.34906005859375, + 169.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.996, + 169.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Authority to Entert ifictnal a Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 424.28045654296875, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 424.28045654296875, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 472.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 472.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 388.7846984863281, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 388.7846984863281, + 85.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT L", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 284, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.72500000000002, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 419.43, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 419.43, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 193.72500000000002, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINDER IN MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 285, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.245, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 515.37, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 515.37, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 100.245, + 285.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT M", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 286, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 287, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 127.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 127.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M., E.W., AND JANE DOE'S JOINDER IN MOTION FOR 0 O SHOW \nCAUSE AND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANG ON D COSTS \nFOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 287, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.62, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 530.2029418945312, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 530.2029418945312, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 82.62, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UAL BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 287, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 383.78448486328125, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 383.78448486328125, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RELIEF REOUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.964, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 370.3468017578125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 370.3468017578125, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 242.964, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AUTHORITY FOR THE ifc 0 AWARD RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.06, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 456.4428405761719, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 456.4428405761719, + 390.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 156.06, + 390.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 528.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 528.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEIZV10E LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.51837158203125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.51837158203125, + 85.863037109375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 145 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 220 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 144 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 71 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Table", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 258, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 259, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 260, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 261, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 262, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 263, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 264, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 265, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 266, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 267, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 268, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 269, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 270, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 271, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 272, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 273, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 274, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 275, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 276, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 277, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 278, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 279, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 280, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 281, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 282, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 283, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 284, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 285, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 286, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 287, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 288, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 289, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 290, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 291, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 292, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 293, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766397" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..712e157c3e94e38540bcf92c2405760c863e5959 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.md @@ -0,0 +1,1378 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACII COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +### MOTION TO COMPEL OR ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES + +Defendant, J. moyfLthti Jonorable Court to compel the Plaintiff to respond to the attached Request to e over the objections raised by the Plaintiff or alternatively, to strike the Pia' C Liviz m for damages and in support would show that Plaintiff's response to Defend ' equest to Produce denies the Defendant access to basic information essential to e he Defendant to prepare his defense against the Plaintiff's claim for damages. extent the Plaintiffs objections are not well-founded, they must be overruled ction must be compelled. To the extent the objections may be well-founded, the "swo shield doctrine" precludes the Plaintiff from continuing to seek affirmative relief while maintaining his assertions of privilege. + +n • r rn <<'-• s t7 • Crl 7. N.) f + +WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Honorable Court to grant his Motion to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Damages. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by + +*FAX AND* U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 13th day of October, 2010. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart +& Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +![]()Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Damages + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +CO + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 AS )AC) Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Attomeys for Jeffity Epstein CLIS' Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +r., Esquire 901 Point West , P.A. C 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, F 334 70 Phone: (561)-727- Fax: (561)-802- Attorneys for + +Marc S marc®n 1 w.com Law Offic of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, +submits his response to the March 18, 2010 Request to Produce served by Defendant, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]"), and states: + +1. 1. All documents upon which the Plaintiff does or may rely in support of his claim for damages against the Defendants, including but not limited to: + 1. a. All agreements with attorneys, the payment of whose services are alleged as an element of damages; + 2. b. All invoices for attorney services and costs alleged as an element of damages; + 3. c. All time records reflecting services rendered, the payment for which is alleged as an element of damages; + 4. d. Every cancelled check, receipt, ledger entry, and other document of whatever kid or description reflecting, referencing, evidencing, or relating to every + +expenditure by you or on your behalf which expenditure is alleged as an element of damages. + +### RESPONSE: + +Objection: this request seeks documents and information protected by the attorney/client privilege and work product privilege, as well as documents that are irrelevant and/or duplicative of other requests. As to subsections (a) a Epstein objects as the information is confidential and protected by attorne 0 / • rivilege, and also asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege. However, Es e r)I I be producing invoices in redacted form which contain substantially the e t ormation requested in subsections (a) and (d). In addition, subsection (d)t:.s u y burdensome as it would require Epstein to cull through thousands of/documents to determine which, if any, documents are responsive. Epstein also, asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an unconstitutionally burden unreasonable, and wo e inference under these circumstances would xercise of my constitutional rights, would be erefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment priyilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4117DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the \ --/ Fifth AMentitnent's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "Mt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."). Without waiving the foregoing objections, Epstein will produce responsive + +documents in redacted form pursuant to the Agreed Order entered on May 21, 2010. The undersigned will produce additional documents the week of May 31, 2010. + +2. Any and all prescriptions for correctives lenses issued to you within the past five (5) years. + +### RESPONSE: + +Documents responsive to this request have already been producedl& + +### Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true cogy\_of the foregoing by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on thisigetlay of May , 201 + +SA. , Jr., Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 — fax Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. , Fistos + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blv West Palm Beach, FL 3 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for pefeitant + +Jack Alan rger, Esq. Atterbury Go b rger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 18 61-835-8691 Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik & Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 745-5849 (954) 745-3556 + +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Bo -yard, Suite 400 West Palm B==ch FL 33401 (561) 842- (561) 2 + +By: . Critton, Jr. Florida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +LAW OFFICES OF +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE +SUITE 400 +WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 + +October 03, 2008 + +![](_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg) + +## INVOICE + +Matter ID: 2008-029 +Client ID: 3371 +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +Invoice # 29091 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +| 09/02/2008 | RDC | Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement to RICO case | 0.49 hr | \$50.00 | +|------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +| | | | | | +| | | | | | +| 09/02/2008 | MJP | Meeting with [redacted] re: RICO | 0:30 hr | \$90.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/03/2008 | RDC | Telephone conference with [redacted] research re: RICO | 4.50 hr | \$2,250.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/03/2008 | MJP | Research and analysis of case law regarding RICO, meeting with [redacted] | 3.30 hr | \$990.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/04/2008 | RDC | Continued research re: RICO and Motions | 2.80 hr | \$1,400.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/04/2008 | RHB | Conference(s) with RDC re: RICO issues | 0.40 hr | \$120.00 | +| 09/04/2008 | RHB | Legal research re: elements, proximate cause, predicate acts, direct injury | 2.10 hr | \$630.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/08/2008 | RHB | Legal research re: Florida RICO civil remedies for criminal practices | 3.50 hr | \$1,050.00 | +| | | | | | +| 09/09/2008 | RHB | Review case law, statutes, treatise material on Chap. 772, Fla. Statute and Fed. RICO | 1.60 hr | \$480.00 | +| 09/09/2008 | RHB | Draft memo summarizing law re: predicate acts, burden of proof, prox. cause | 2.40 hr | \$720.00 | + +Invoice # 29091 + +Federal ID # 69-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted] + +09/10/2008 MJP Research regarding RICO, review [Redacted] and meeting with [Redacted] 1:10hr \$330.00 + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +09/11/2008 MJP Research regarding RICO as per [Redacted] 1:00hr \$300.00 + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of handwritten content, mostly completely obscured by black bars.] + +### For Professional Services Rendered; + +k5. + +Invoice # 29091 + +Federal ID # 69-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +Total Professional Services: [REDACTED] + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +Invoice # 29091 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**INVOICE SUMMARY** + +| Producer | Rate | Hours | Amount | +|-----------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| +| RDC | \$0.00 | | | +| RDC | \$500.00 | | | +| RHB | \$0.00 | | | +| RHB | \$300.00 | | | +| BM | \$125.00 | | | +| MJP | \$0.00 | | | +| MJP | \$300.00 | | | + +For Professional Services: [REDACTED] Hours [REDACTED] + +For Disbursements Incurred: [REDACTED] + +New Charges this Invoice: [REDACTED] + +Previous Balance: [REDACTED] + +Less Payment and Credits Received: [REDACTED] + +Outstanding Balance: [REDACTED] + +Plus New Charges this Invoice: [REDACTED] + +**Total Due:** [REDACTED] + +Balance in Trust: [REDACTED] + +Balance in Retainer: [REDACTED] + +LAW OFFICES OF +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE +SUITE 400 +WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 + +November 07, 2008 + +[REDACTED] + +**IN VOICE** + +Matter ID: 2008-029 + +Client ID: 3371 +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[REDACTED] + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 69-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| 10/03/2008 | MJP | Research regarding RICO statements, confer with | | | | | | | +|------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|---------|----------| +| | | | | | | | 1.20 hr | \$360.00 | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| 10/08/2008 | RHB | J.D.-S.D. Gase #80893; review complaint; review statutes referenced in Complaint | 1.90 hr | \$570.00 | +|------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------| +| 10/09/2008 | RHB | Continue draft and legal research for Motion to Dismiss; More Definite Statement and to Strike Complaint (#80893 J.D. case) | 3.70 hr | \$1,110.00 | +| 10/10/2008 | RDC | Review Motion and RICO statement re: Jane Doe; revision | 1.60 hr | \$800.00 | + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block] + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | | +|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | | +| 10/21/2008 RHB | Draft reply to Jane Doe's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(#80893/Federal) | 2.30hr | \$690.00 | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| 10/22/2008 RHB | Legal research re: Enterprize element of RICO claim | 0.50hr | \$150.00 | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +![]()For Professional Services Rendered: + +Vis 11" karowk. 411N, + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +Total Professional Services: + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +Total Disbursements Incurred: + +**INVOICE SUMMARY** + +| Producer | Rate | Hours | Amount | +|-----------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| +| COU | \$10.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| BM | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MJR | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| LG | \$50.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 29208 + +Federal ID # 69-2827481 + +For Professional Services: + +[REDACTED] + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +[REDACTED] + +New Charges this Invoice: + +[REDACTED] + +Previous Balance: + +[REDACTED] + +Less Payment and Credits Received: + +[REDACTED] + +Outstanding Balance: + +[REDACTED] + +Plus New Charges this Invoice: + +[REDACTED] + +Total Due: + +[REDACTED] + +Balance in Trust: + +[REDACTED] + +Balance in Retainer: + +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] + +# LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 A Cots + +April 06, 2009 + +## INVOICE + +Matter ID: 2008-029 + +Client ID: 3371 + +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +\$75 + +1O# + +csom OM Via MIS IIStall + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content.] + +Invoice # 29875 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827484 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content.] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block] + +Mailer ID: 2008-029 + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks consisting of several lines] + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +![](_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg) + +Fag, r, + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[REDACTED] + +03/26/2009 MJP Meeting with [REDACTED], regarding personal injury and indirect injury type damages regarding Motion to Dismiss 0.40 hr \$120.00 + +[REDACTED] + +03/26/2009 MJP Preparing for Motion to Dismiss Hearing on Jane Doe 0.90 hr \$270.00 + +[REDACTED] + +03/27/2009 MJP Research on Motion to Dismiss, confer with [REDACTED], regarding same, research response in opposition 5.30 hr \$1,590.00 + +[REDACTED] + +03/27/2009 RDC Conference with [REDACTED]: Rico issues 0.70 hr \$350.00 + +[REDACTED] + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +03/29/2009 MJP Research and prepare for Motion to Dismiss, review and analysis of case law and RICO statement, review and analysis of RICO conspiracy 1.90 hr \$570.00 + +[Redacted text block containing multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +03/31/2009 RDC Prepare for hearing; read Rico and motions/responses 3.50 hr \$1,750.00 + +[Redacted text block containing multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +03/31/2009 MJP Meeting with [Redacted text block], re: preparing for Motion to Dismiss (JD), [Redacted text block], review and analysis of plea 2.40 hr \$720.00 + +[Redacted text block] + +Total Professional Services: [Redacted text block] + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +[Redacted text block containing multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**For Disbursements Incurred:** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +### For Disbursements Incurred: + +Total Disbursements incurred: + +Invoice # 29675 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**INVOICE SUMMARY** + +| Producer | Rate | Hours | Amount | +|-----------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| +| JMB | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| BM | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MJP | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| LG | \$50.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +For Professional Services: +For Disbursements Incurred: + +[REDACTED] Hours + +Applied From Trust: +Applied From Retainer: + +New Charges this Invoice: + +Previous Balance: + +Less Payment and Credits Received: + +Outstanding Balance: + +Plus New Charges this Invoice: + +Total Due: + +Balance in Trust: + +Balance in Retainer: + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +LAW OFFICES OF +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP +615 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE +SUITE 400 +WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 + +July 07, 2009 + +[REDACTED] + +## INVOICE + +Matter ID: 2008-029 +Client ID: 3371 +EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +Invoice # 30004 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoke # 30004 + +• • Fedora/ ID 659.2827481 + +For Profeeelonal Seneca Rendered: + +ogi Egagitaged + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID #-59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID #-59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[REDACTED] + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +06/11/2009,•:MJP. Drafting Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Jane Doe (SR) Amended Complaint, 11.30 hi \$3,390.00 research and analysis of case law re: same, meeting wl e: same, research and analysis of enterprise theory, common purpose under RICO and personal Injury damages not awarded under RICO • • v:is...:10.01i-Ivairj., 06/12/2009 egai CS MS + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block] + +06/12/2009 MJP Finalize Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Jane Doe (6R) Amended Complaint, telephone conference with B. [Redacted] 7.40 hr \$2,220.00 + +[Redacted text block] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block containing multiple lines of text and a small number of bulleted items.] + +Invoice # 30004 + +-----Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is intensely controlled and mostly redacted.] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # [REDACTED] + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[REDACTED] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID-#-59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely heavily redacted and is completely illegible.] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block] + +Total Professional Services: [Redacted] + +### For Disbursements Incurred: + +Wm; exi gal ti ti ; c + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID # 59-2827481 + +**For Disbursements Incurred:** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +Total Disbursements Incurred: + +[REDACTED] + +Invoice # 30004 + +Federal-ID-# 59-2827481 + +**INVOICE SUMMARY** + +| Producer | Rate | Hours | Amount | +|-----------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| +| JMB | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| JMB | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MTL | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| BM | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| HMR | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MJP | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| ASB | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| LG | \$50.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| JC | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| DR | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| DR | \$250.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +For Professional Services: [REDACTED] hours [REDACTED] + +For Disbursements Incurred: [REDACTED] + +New Charges this Invoice: [REDACTED] + +Previous Balance: [REDACTED] + +Less Payment and Credits Received: [REDACTED] + +Outstanding Balance: [REDACTED] + +Plus New Charges this Invoice: [REDACTED] + +Total Due: [REDACTED] + +Balance in Trust: [REDACTED] + +Balance in Retainer: [REDACTED] + +LAW OFFICES OF + BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP + 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE + SUITE 400 + WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 + +August 06, 2009 + +[REDACTED] + +## INVOICE + +Matter ID: 2008-029 + +Client ID: 3371 + EPSTEIN, JEFFREY + +Invoice # 30081 + Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +--- + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out characters] + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks containing multiple lines of blacked-out content. The text is extremely blurry and illegible.] + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks consisting of multiple lines] + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text blocks consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out characters. The text is extremely blurred and illegible.] + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block consisting of multiple lines of blacked-out content] + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +|------------|------------|------------|------------| +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | +| [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | [Redacted] | + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +[Redacted text block] + +[Redacted text block] + +[Redacted text block] + +07/27/2009 MJP + +Research and analysis of case law regarding preemotion of state law by federal law in connection with RICO (Shawna R, Jane Doe), research regarding legislative intent under RICO, meeting with R. Critton, Esq., re: same, + +4.40 hr \$1,320.00 + +[Redacted text block] + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] +[Redacted] + +07/27/2009 MJP + +Drafting Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss in Jane Doe, research regarding same + +1.20 hr + +\$360.00 + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +[Redacted] + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +**For Professional Services Rendered:** + +07/28/2009 MJPResearch and analysis of case law regarding federal courts construing state statutes along side federal acts and statutes, drafting Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, update RICO research, meeting with M. Burman, Esq., regarding legislative history on Rico, research re: legislative history, telephone conference with B. [REDACTED] - All relating to Jane Doe (SR) + +6.70 hr + +\$2,010.00 + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +**[REDACTED] [REDACTED]** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +**SECRET** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +**SECRET SECRET SECRET SECRET** + +![Separate boxes for the two sections of the document.]()[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +**SECRET** (REDACTED) + +**SECRET** + +[REDACTED] + +|

[REDACTED]

|

[REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------|--------------------------| +|--------------------------|--------------------------| + +![Three pencils with different shades of gray and black.]()[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +**CONSULTANTS** +**CONSULTANTS** +**CONSULTANTS** +**CONSULTANTS** + +**Secret** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +![A small pencil icon in the bottom right corner.]()[Redacted text block] + +**SECRET (S)** + +**SECURITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE** + COMMUNICATIONS SECTION + APRIL 1, 1968 + +[REDACTED] + +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +|------------|------------| +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| [REDACTED] | [RE | + +[REDACTED] + +**State of Massachusetts** + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +**SECRET** + +[REDACTED] + +**SECRET SECRET** + +For Professional Services Rendered: + +[Redacted text block containing multiple lines of blacked-out content.] + +### For Professional Services Rendered: + +Je: Wit,:istr,i A • :silt?' + +### Incurred: + +Total Professional Services: + +"kW >i" + +Invoice # 30081 +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +Total Disbursements Incurred: + +Invoice # 30081 + +Federal ID # 59-2827481 + +### INVOICE SUMMARY + +| Producer | Rate | Hours | Amount | +|-----------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| +| COU | \$10.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| JMB | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| JMB | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RDC | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| RHB | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MTL | \$500.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| BM | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MJP | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| MJP | \$300.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| ASB | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| LG | \$60.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| JC | \$125.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| DY | \$0.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | +| DY | \$250.00 | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | + +For Professional Services: + +For Disbursements Incurred: + +New Charges this Invoice: + +Previous Balance: + +Less Payment and Credits Received: + +Outstanding Balance: + +Plus New Charges this Invoke: + +Total Due: + +Balance In Trust + +Balance In Retainer. + +![](_page_74_Picture_15.jpeg) + +![](_page_74_Picture_16.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..067ec413ec1149af651304e9d626df152ce04c23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/EFTA02766691.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3550 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 75, + "chars": 43911, + "elapsed_seconds": 418.55, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_74_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_74_Picture_16.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACII COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.0, + 80.16 + ], + [ + 547.626, + 80.16 + ], + [ + 547.626, + 122.863037109375 + ], + [ + 321.0, + 122.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO COMPEL OR ALTERNATIVELY \nTO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.55, + 354.875 + ], + [ + 463.28887939453125, + 354.875 + ], + [ + 463.28887939453125, + 383.10302734375 + ], + [ + 176.55, + 383.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.924, + 153.171 + ], + [ + 365.3853759765625, + 153.171 + ], + [ + 365.3853759765625, + 167.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.924, + 167.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.222, + 84.33500000000001 + ], + [ + 556.614, + 84.33500000000001 + ], + [ + 556.614, + 126.085 + ], + [ + 315.222, + 126.085 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.82, + 331.495 + ], + [ + 507.82200000000006, + 331.495 + ], + [ + 507.82200000000006, + 347.35999999999996 + ], + [ + 134.82, + 347.35999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.05399999999999, + 142.29000000000002 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 142.29000000000002 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 157.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 120.05399999999999, + 157.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.77000000000001, + 196.225 + ], + [ + 192.6, + 196.225 + ], + [ + 192.6, + 210.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 118.77000000000001, + 210.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.084, + 250.49999999999997 + ], + [ + 383.6611022949219, + 250.49999999999997 + ], + [ + 383.6611022949219, + 265.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 258.084, + 265.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 133.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 428.21400000000006, + 133.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 428.21400000000006, + 188.32500000000002 + ], + [ + 215.07000000000002, + 188.32500000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.01000000000005, + 268.677 + ], + [ + 360.80400000000003, + 268.677 + ], + [ + 360.80400000000003, + 286.254 + ], + [ + 260.01000000000005, + 286.254 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.756, + 369.117 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 369.117 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 380.83500000000004 + ], + [ + 75.756, + 380.83500000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered;", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.608, + 199.20600000000002 + ], + [ + 230.4386444091797, + 199.20600000000002 + ], + [ + 230.4386444091797, + 211.76100000000002 + ], + [ + 79.608, + 211.76100000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.966, + 200.043 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 200.043 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 211.76100000000002 + ], + [ + 78.966, + 211.76100000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.03999999999999, + 369.1170000000001 + ], + [ + 197.09400000000002, + 369.1170000000001 + ], + [ + 197.09400000000002, + 380.8350000000001 + ], + [ + 77.03999999999999, + 380.8350000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE SUMMARY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.776, + 204.228 + ], + [ + 385.2, + 204.228 + ], + [ + 385.2, + 219.294 + ], + [ + 274.776, + 219.294 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.428, + 129.73499999999999 + ], + [ + 426.288, + 129.73499999999999 + ], + [ + 426.288, + 184.977 + ], + [ + 214.428, + 184.977 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN VOICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.368, + 264.492 + ], + [ + 360.16200000000003, + 264.492 + ], + [ + 360.16200000000003, + 282.906 + ], + [ + 259.368, + 282.906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.89200000000001, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 229.83599999999998, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 229.83599999999998, + 215.94600000000003 + ], + [ + 80.89200000000001, + 215.94600000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.25, + 205.06500000000003 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 205.06500000000003 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 217.62000000000003 + ], + [ + 80.25, + 217.62000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.534, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 215.94600000000003 + ], + [ + 81.534, + 215.94600000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE SUMMARY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.492, + 476.253 + ], + [ + 383.274, + 476.253 + ], + [ + 383.274, + 490.48199999999997 + ], + [ + 273.492, + 490.48199999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF \nBURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP \n515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE \nSUITE 400 \nWEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 \nA Cots", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.922, + 135.108 + ], + [ + 533.3528442382812, + 135.108 + ], + [ + 533.3528442382812, + 302.72943115234375 + ], + [ + 218.922, + 302.72943115234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.21999999999997, + 259.15264892578125 + ], + [ + 370.2371826171875, + 259.15264892578125 + ], + [ + 370.2371826171875, + 280.4635009765625 + ], + [ + 263.21999999999997, + 280.4635009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.25, + 195.85800000000003 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 195.85800000000003 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 207.576 + ], + [ + 80.25, + 207.576 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.324, + 194.184 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 194.184 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 206.73899999999998 + ], + [ + 78.324, + 206.73899999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.608, + 194.184 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 194.184 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 205.90200000000002 + ], + [ + 79.608, + 205.90200000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.90400000000001, + 682.155 + ], + [ + 192.6, + 682.155 + ], + [ + 192.6, + 694.7099999999999 + ], + [ + 71.90400000000001, + 694.7099999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.756, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 203.391 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 215.94600000000003 + ], + [ + 75.756, + 215.94600000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.114, + 189.39447021484375 + ], + [ + 195.74530029296875, + 189.39447021484375 + ], + [ + 195.74530029296875, + 201.71699999999998 + ], + [ + 75.114, + 201.71699999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE SUMMARY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.85, + 191.06400000000002 + ], + [ + 385.2, + 191.06400000000002 + ], + [ + 385.2, + 206.148 + ], + [ + 272.85, + 206.148 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 615 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.65, + 110.22 + ], + [ + 419.86800000000005, + 110.22 + ], + [ + 419.86800000000005, + 163.66 + ], + [ + 208.65, + 163.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.948, + 233.8 + ], + [ + 354.384, + 233.8 + ], + [ + 354.384, + 251.33499999999998 + ], + [ + 252.948, + 251.33499999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.188, + 182.466 + ], + [ + 222.774, + 182.466 + ], + [ + 222.774, + 194.184 + ], + [ + 73.188, + 194.184 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.83, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 223.41599999999997, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 223.41599999999997, + 204.575 + ], + [ + 73.83, + 204.575 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.188, + 193.48800000000003 + ], + [ + 225.82229614257812, + 193.48800000000003 + ], + [ + 225.82229614257812, + 205.998 + ], + [ + 73.188, + 205.998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.03999999999999, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 205.06500000000003 + ], + [ + 77.03999999999999, + 205.06500000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.324, + 186.65100000000004 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 186.65100000000004 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 198.369 + ], + [ + 78.324, + 198.369 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.324, + 176.607 + ], + [ + 228.552, + 176.607 + ], + [ + 228.552, + 189.99900000000002 + ], + [ + 78.324, + 189.99900000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.756, + 185.814 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 185.814 + ], + [ + 227.26799999999997, + 198.369 + ], + [ + 75.756, + 198.369 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.27, + 194.18400000000003 + ], + [ + 201.88278198242188, + 194.18400000000003 + ], + [ + 201.88278198242188, + 207.57599999999996 + ], + [ + 81.27, + 207.57599999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.398, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 195.168, + 204.575 + ], + [ + 76.398, + 204.575 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE SUMMARY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.998, + 195.39 + ], + [ + 378.138, + 195.39 + ], + [ + 378.138, + 209.58499999999998 + ], + [ + 268.998, + 209.58499999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW OFFICES OF BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 400 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.848, + 118.01699999999998 + ], + [ + 430.78200000000004, + 118.01699999999998 + ], + [ + 430.78200000000004, + 171.585 + ], + [ + 220.848, + 171.585 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.504, + 241.05599999999995 + ], + [ + 364.01399999999995, + 241.05599999999995 + ], + [ + 364.01399999999995, + 259.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 264.504, + 259.46999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.25, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 192.05 + ], + [ + 231.12, + 205.41 + ], + [ + 80.25, + 205.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.25, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 192.51 + ], + [ + 229.19400000000002, + 205.06500000000003 + ], + [ + 80.25, + 205.06500000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Professional Services Rendered:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.88999938964844, + 191.673 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 191.673 + ], + [ + 231.76199999999997, + 204.58111572265625 + ], + [ + 80.88999938964844, + 204.58111572265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.756, + 422.68500000000006 + ], + [ + 195.80999999999997, + 422.68500000000006 + ], + [ + 195.80999999999997, + 435.24000000000007 + ], + [ + 75.756, + 435.24000000000007 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Disbursements Incurred:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.102, + 193.34700000000004 + ], + [ + 203.514, + 193.34700000000004 + ], + [ + 203.514, + 206.73899999999998 + ], + [ + 84.102, + 206.73899999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INVOICE SUMMARY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.566, + 199.55889892578125 + ], + [ + 384.3943176269531, + 199.55889892578125 + ], + [ + 384.3943176269531, + 214.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 271.566, + 214.30352783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Span", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 96 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766691" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42f3670af73ed0ef08da872bf0555cab321c74a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_30_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:134fa90a9f692e71f1c5130dc6757ddc5a20e0dc1c025cb485c795c78fbf757e +size 422888 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7cf53118b86f49143b2915a82344a0594a867a9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_6_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d41367d4337de0433882227f3d89a3b74a68c1f20104c4bd1798dff126c78167 +size 13483 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e939b986379f036f41b2b501f054627223ccf195 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eb334d278f5799059cc3274f5e3b49ec53f7bca367135b5e2f8dc3cf0eaae8c2 +size 19380 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9e7fac9d619a9515d5a2ad500e13aae9c96d31e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766691/_page_74_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eef66655fc5c446f9a7f22f70d177a96e7575ac03cbc504fed280ccba6182222 +size 4215 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d2840316fa56b0a7d85089af82ad75a47da2875 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.md @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOT!' ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff CO 'S + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE ,OF DQCUMENTS, ETC. + +As supplemental authority in support 'on for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents Determine Relevance, lnapplicabi Work Product With Regard to,' Sealed Specific Request for In Camera Review to Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney ocuments, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), respectfully ;nits the attached Opinion issued on March 23, 2018, in Drummond Co., Inc. V. Conra(& Scherer, LLP, No. 2:11-cv-03695-RDP-TMP (11th Cir.). In that case, the United States Cott of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the crime-fraud exception may \_ apply to overcome a law firm's claim of work-product protection for materials related to lawsuits where the firm served as counsel, despite the fact that its clients were innocent of wrongdoing. + +Drummond had sued the law firm Conrad & Scherer, LLP (C&S) and its partner (Collingsworth) for defamation and sought discovery about witness payments. (Op. at 7.) Drummond sought to use the crime-fraud exception to overcome C&S's claim of attorney-client + +and work-product protection over documents in their case files. (Op. at I I.) The district court determined that the crime-fraud exception may apply, ordered a special to review the contested documents in camera that C&S and Collingsworth claimed were privileged or workproduct protected, and certified its Order for immediate appeal. (Op. at 15.) + +On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit reiterated that "the crime-fraud exception removes the `seal of secrecy' from attorney-client communications or work product material ly n they are made in furtherance of an ongoing or future crime or fraud." (Op. at 19 cifA R nit , States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 563 (1989).) 0 + +Following earlier precedent in Parrott v. Wilson, 707 F.2d 1271 (11th Cir. 1983), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the part of the district co fraud exception may be applied because an attorney' overcome attorney work-product protection. I.R.S., 654 F.2d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1981), innocence, where the attorney is ac A of the crime-fraud exception ma requires the court to ap a ba ancing test to weigh the client's legitimate interest in secrecy determining that the crimefraudulent conduct may, alone, 3-24.) The court also relied on Moody v. in Parrott, in recognizing that the client's isconduct, does not absolutely bar the application s shielded by the work product doctrine. Instead, it against the tr.aso d' ure. (Op. at 25-26.) The court resolved the pure legal issue by holding that ' c ri -fraud exception may be applied to eliminate work product protection based o a misconduct when the client is innocent" (Op. at 26-27.) The Court directed that, "On r and, under the district court's order, the special will perform an in camera review of certain categories of documents that CAS and Collingsworth contend are protected by the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection." (Op. at 27, n. 14.) + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on April 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]A + +By: is/Scott./ Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FB. Primary: c.ttelin kl m Primary: Kara in w.com Primary: Rac inkrocklaw.com Secondary• nkr cklaw c Second inkrocklaw.com Seco rvi linkrocklaw. m 03) m + +ounsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Epstein + +#### VICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, S 2139 Palm Beac West Palm B dvitale scarolatea terryteam@searcylav om Co-Counselor iendani/Counter-Plainiiff J. a, B4thart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard L 3409 + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com nisQFLAtmellateLaw.com kbtAFLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseicalendant/Counter-Plaintift + +J. + +J. Marc S. Nurik + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +marc®nuriklaw.com + +Pottinger LIC + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 + +bradeepllc.com + +Co-CounserSendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +igoldbergeraagwva.com + +Paul Cassell + +383 S. University + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 + +cassellp@law.utah.edu + +Limited Intervenor Co-C !for L.M., LW smahoney@agwpa.com and Jane Doe O + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant + +Jeffrey Epstein + +ec Jane • ited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. + +Jay How + +Jay H e sociates + +644 d., Suite 250 + +J \* .comFL 32211 + +o 4a + +Doe + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +[PUBLISH] + +# IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT + +Nos. 16-11090, 15-90031 + +D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cv-03695-RDP-T + +DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC., + +Defendant - Appellant. + +\*ntiff - Appellee, + +CONRAD & SCHERER, LLP, + +App r from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama + +(March 23, 2018) + +Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and BARTLE,\* Circuit Judges. + +JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: + +Honorable Harvey Bartle III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. + +Drummond, Inc., sued Conrad & Scherer, LLP ("C&S"), a law firm, and its partner, Terrence Collingsworth, for defamation. In this appeal, C&S seeks interlocutory review of the district court's order concluding that the crime-fraud exception could defeat the firm's and Collingsworth's assertions in discovery of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protection. The di t court made a preliminary determination that the crime-fraud exceptio ply to overcome their assertions of privilege and attorney work pr c tection and ordered a special to perform an in camera reve9C1Q determine whether the crime-fraud exception does apply. Although n ti ers generally are not immediately appealable, the district court its order for immediate appeal, and a motions panel of this Court S permission to bring an interlocutory appeal under 28 t 1292(b). + +After full briefing b the 3rties and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that interloc~lyreview is appropriate to address only one aspect of the district court' brat, We vacate as improvidently granted the motion panel's order in part not to exercise our discretion to review the question posed in that part: wh er the district court erred in applying agency principles to conclude that C&S intended to commit a crime or fraud and created attorney work product or + +made communications in furtherance of the crime or fraud.' We decline to review this issue because it does not present a pure question of law suitable for review on an interlocutory basis under § 1292(b). Accordingly, we vacate the motion panel's earlier order in part and deny C&S's petition in part. + +wan ted, whether do address the other issue on which interlocutory review the crime-fraud exception may be applied to overcome assertion, as a defendant in this case, that its materials related to othe aw where it served as counsel are protected as attorney work pro hen the firm's clients in those lawsuits were innocent of any wrongdoins lttfuestion presents the pure be invoked when a lawyer and or fraud but there is no such finding legal issue of whether work product prot law firm are found to have engaged i as to the client or clients they ed. Following our precedent and persuasive decisions from other circuity 6onclude that the crime-fraud exception may t defeat work product p 'on in this circumstance. We thus affirm the part of the district court' (§) Str determining that the crime-fraud exception could be applied + +e merits panel, we have the authority to vacate as improvidently granted the motions el's decision to permit the interlocutory appeal. See McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 381 F.3d 1251, 1253 ("Like all motions initially ruled upon by a motions panel, [an order by a motions panel granting permission for an interlocutory appeal under § 1292(b)] is subject to being vacated as improvidently granted by the merits panel to which the case is assigned for decision."); see also Ilth Cir. R. 27-1(g) ("A ruling on a motion or other interlocutory matter ... is not binding upon the panel to which the appeal is assigned on the merits, and the merits panel may alter, amend, or vacate it."). + +2We note that this issue does not concern materials claimed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege. + +to overcome C&S's claim of work product protection for materials related to lawsuits where C&S served as counsel despite the fact that its clients were innocent of wrongdoing. + +#### I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND + +This appeal arises out of a complex dispute that began when Col sworth, a C&S partner, represented Colombian citizens who sued Drumm Alabama company, in federal court in Alabama, alleging that Drum upported paramilitary groups in Colombia that murdered privat • "z . To provide the necessary context for our discussion, we recoun Colombian citizens' lawsuits against D against Collingsworth and C&S. ant history of the d Drummond's later lawsuit + +#### A. Collingsworth and C& esentation of Colombians Suing Drummond + +In his law practice, • gsworth primarily represents victims of human rights abuses. H •oin ;M r&S as a partner to litigate such cases. Although the firm is base I 'thy he worked out of and managed its Washington D.C. office + +While a partner at C&S, Collingsworth filed on behalf of Colombian citizens several lawsuits (the "alien tort cases") against Drummond, which operates coal mines around the world, including in Colombia. The plaintiffs sued Drummond under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, and the Torture Victim Protection + +Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-256, 106 Stat. 73 (1992) (codified at 28 U.S.C. 1350 note), alleging that Drummond hired members of the paramilitary to provide security services around its mines in Colombia and that these individuals, acting as the agents of Drummond, killed civilians in violation of the laws of nations. See generally Doe v. Drummond Co., 782 F.3d 576, 579-81 Cir. 2015). + +Collingsworth acted as the lead C&S attorney in thesp illiam Scherer, the firm's managing partner, and other C&S~CtRl ieys entered appearances in the cases. As managing partner delegated to Collingsworth the authority to litigate the + +To support the claims against k ind, Collingsworth developed evidence connecting Drumm° paramilitary's violent actions. He secured testimony from several fo embers of the paramilitary, including Jairo de Jesus Charris, Libardo !It'd e, Jose Gelvez Albarracin, Alcides Manuel Mattos Tabaraes ("S ), and Jhon Jairo Esquivel Cuadrado ("El Tigre"). These witnesses testimony that implicated Drummond. Additionally, Collings rth relied on testimony from Jamie =, who worked as a contractor for Drummond in Colombia. testified that Drummond sent him money that he was directed to use to pay the paramilitary for security services. + +In the alien tort cases, Drummond sought discovery about whether the plaintiffs or their attorneys had paid or given anything of value to these witnesses in exchange for their testimony. In response, the plaintiffs identified three witnesses who had been paid—Chants, Duarte, and Gelvez.3 The plaintiffs claimed these payments were made to provide security to the family n ers of the witnesses who were in danger as a result of the witnesses' to The plaintiffs in the alien tort cases did not identify any payme ade to Samario, El Tigre, or + +Ultimately, Drummond prevailed in eac en tort cases.4 But the dispute between Drummond, on the one &S and Collingsworth, on the other, was only beginning. + +but C would not tiffs also identified a fourth potential witness who received money from C&S, opped paying this potential witness when it determined that he was not credible and used as a witness. + +4Balcero Giraldo v. Drummond Co., No. 2:09-CV-1041, 2013 WL 3873960 (N.D. Ala. July 25, 2013) (granting summary judgment in favor of Drummond), aff'd sub nom. Doe v. Drummond Co., 782 F.3d 576 (11th Cir. 2015); Baloco v. Drummond Co., No. 7:09-CV-00557, 2012 WL 4009432 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 12, 2012) (dismissing case in part and granting summary judgment in favor of Drtunmond), aff'd 767 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir. 2014); Order, Melo Penaloza v. Drummond Co., No. 2:13-cv-393 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2016), ECF No. 59 (dismissing case with prejudice), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, vacated in part, and remanded with instructions 662 F. App'x 673 (11th Cir. 2016). + +#### B. Drummond's Defamation Action Against Collingsworth and C&S + +#### 1. Drummond Files a Defamation Action and Seeks Discovery About Witness Payments. + +While the alien tort cases were pending, Collingsworth wrote letters on C&S stationary to the Dutch government and a Japanese company accusing Drummond of supporting paramilitary groups that murdered hundreds of Colomb ens. After Collingsworth sent these letters, Drummond sued Collin d C&S for defamation in federal court in Alabama (the "defamatio 0 cas + +At the beginning of the defamation case, Coll rth and C&S were jointly represented by outside counsel. Beca ingsworth's central role in the underlying litigation and in writing ( i4ciicin, dly defamatory letters, he was the C&S partner primarily responsible wo ' g with outside counsel. In their joint answer, Collingsworth and liability and raised several defenses, including that the statemen e letters were true and that they had not acted maliciously. + +Attegtpt prove that Collingsworth had known the statements in his letter se and that he had acted with malice, Drummond served discovery requests about the methods Collingsworth and his litigation team had used in the alien tort cases to secure testimony from the witnesses, including information about any payments made to the witnesses. Collingsworth and C&S responded that they had previously disclosed all payments made to witnesses, pointing to their disclosures that payments had been made to Charris, Duarte, and Gelvez. In hearings and other filings with the district court, Collingsworth and C&S's outside counsel repeated that only Charris, Duarte, and Gelvez had received payments. + +# 2. Through Discovery, Additional Witness Payments Are Uncovered. + +As it turns out, all of these statements made in discovery were f t Eventually, Collingsworth and C&S admitted that El Tigre, Sam IR, , nd had also received payments. The payments were uncover mmond subpoenaed a law firm that had served as C&S's co- 1 in the alien tort cases. That law firm produced an email showing that orth had asked co-counsel and Scherer for permission to pay appro 00,000 in attorney's fees on behalf in a pending criminal\$ As sanctions, Drummond asked the court to enter a default judgment against Collingsworth and CReS, hold Collingsworth in contempt of court, and award Drummond its reasonable attorney's fees. + +known about the witness payments and that once he learned of the payments, he made sure that C&S promptly disclosed them to the court. + +Although Collingsworth and Scherer provided this general information, they refused to answer many categories of questions posed in discovery, claiming that the information Drummond sought was protected by the attorney-clie vilege or the attorney work product doctrine. For example, Collingswo sed to answer questions regarding communications about the wi ss p ents that he had had with Ivan Otero, a Colombian attorney who as a conduit for payments from C&S to El Tigre and Samarioo,,'9 ep rfy who was involved in drafting the filings in the defamation acti ic ,contained misrepresentations about the witness payments. And Co li tiv 9S 1rthand Scherer refused to answer questions about what caused slue that they had made inaccurate statements about the witne pa ents or the process that led them to correct their t misstatements, claimi ie information sought was privileged or protected from discovery. D d asked the court to hold that the crime-fraud exception vitiated orth and C&S's claims of attorney-client privilege and work product p • tection. + +#### 4. The District Court Applies the Crime-Fraud Exception. + +After a hearing, the district court issued an order applying the crime-fraud exception to both Collingsworth and C&S. In reaching this conclusion, the district court followed our circuit's two-part test for applying the crime-fraud exception and determined that Drummond had (I) made a prima facie showing that Collingsworth and C&S had engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct when seeking the advice of counsel and creating attorney work product in the alien tort and defamation cases and (2) identified categories of communications attorney work product that may not be protected from discovery because ere used to further a crime or fraud. + +C First, the district court pointed to evidence that cCollingsworth and C&S had engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct sought the advice of outside counsel in the defamation case an c attorney work product in both the alien tort and defamation cases. 's ct court determined that the crimefraud exception's first prong aft3fied as to three crimes: fraud on the court, witness bribery, and subort Cg , rjury. The court emphasized that it was not holding that a crime oktittied actually had been committed, but only that a prima facie case h tablished. + +I 1ing that there was a prima facie case of fraud on the court, the district cdirt identified numerous false statements Collingsworth and C&S had made to the court. The court identified misstatements regarding witness payments that Collingsworth had made to the court in the alien tort cases when he was acting as a C&S partner, as well as misstatements that Collingsworth and outside counsel + +had made in the defamation action. The court found that both Collingsworth and C&S had made these false statements knowingly. + +In a lengthy footnote, the district court explained that there was sufficient evidence to find that C&S had knowingly made misstatements. First, the court explained that because Collingsworth was a partner in C&S and was a sil• k for the firm's benefit, his actions and knowledge were attributable to th under agency principles. Second, the court cited evidence show er firm partners and employees, including Scherer, had been of the monthly payments being made to the witnesses and explk it was unbelievable that no one at the firm other than Collingswo eCt 1 own of the payments. + +As for the witness bribery and g perjury crimes, the district court determined that Drummond h 9% shed a prima facie case with evidence that the witnesses add ceived payments from the litigation team under suspicious circumstan Sr. he court once again relied on agency principles to establish the m cie showing that C&S had bribed witnesses and suborned perjury, e g that every action taken by Collingsworth in the case had been in his cap city as a partner and agent of C&S. + +The district court then turned to the second prong of the test, which required a showing that the communication was made or attorney work product was created in furtherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity. Because the court did not + +have before it the specific materials that Collingsworth and C&S claimed were privileged or protected from discovery, in lieu of a document-by-document analysis the court considered whether the categories of discovery Drummond sought were sufficiently related to the allegations of fraud, witness bribery, and suborning perjury. The court found that each category of discovery D identified was sufficiently related to the allegations of fraud on bribery, and suborning perjury. These categories of info ilyt, witness uded: + +- Collingsworth's communications with Ilan attorney who served as the intermedi Tigre and Samario and from van ero, the Colombian ents from C&S to El +- Collingsworth and C&S's wi ing and redaction of documents produced to Drummond i e ation case showing payments to El Tigre and Samario; +- Collingsworth an drafting of pleadings and papers in the alien tort and defa that included misrepresentations regarding the scope, na e, ap extent of witness payments; +- Collings s email informing Scherer and his co-counsel that El Tigre would receive ongoing monthly payments and a as done with the email after it sent; Oingsworth's communications with attorney Paul about itness payments; +- Collin disclosure of payments to El Tigre, Samario, and to outside counsel in the defamation case; +- Collingsworth's payment of \$100,000 to a consulting attorney in Colombia who assisted in obtaining access to prisoners in Colombia in order to interview and depose them in the alien tort cases; + +- Collingsworth's communications with van Bilderbeek regarding payments to I= and +- Collingsworth and C&S's search for documents in the defamation case. + +After determining that the crime-fraud exception may apply, the district court ordered a special to review in camera the documents that Collingsworth and C&S claimed were privileged or protected as ey work product to determine whether each individual document w erance of or closely related to a fraud on the court or crime and the s ould be produced to Drummond. The court also set forth a procedu pecial to assess a it witness's assertion of attorney-client pHs,' a orney work production protection in a deposition. The court that when necessary a witness should give in camera testimo ally ex parte, so that the special could appropriately assess y ilege issues while limiting disclosure only to information used or c ?kr\*in furtherance of the crime or fraud. + +After ex mg why the crime-fraud exception applied, the district court certified rder involved controlling questions of law as to which there may be a subs tial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the litigation. In addressing certification, the district court did not identify the specific controlling questions of law that it believed warranted interlocutory review. + +#### 5. A Motions Panel of This Court Granted C&S Permission for an Interlocutory Appeal. + +Collingsworth and C&S filed separate petitions for review with our Court, seeking permission to file interlocutory appeals from the district court's order. A motions panel denied Collingsworth's petition. A separate motions panel granted A C&S's petition as to the following two questions: + +- 1. Can agency principles be used to impute the app S5n f the crime-fraud exception to an agent's prin ere the principal has separately-held privileges as a c u ef= ndant in the suit and there is no finding that the exce 'es directly to the principal? +- 2. Can agency principles be used t the application of the crime-fraud exception to an a: cipal where the agent is operating as an attorney an' s no finding that the client's behavior triggered the ud exception or that the exception applies e principal? + +#### H. BACKGROUND ATTORNEY WO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, CT DOCTRINE, AND CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION + +The issues in th 1 center on how the attorney-client privilege, attorney work produc e, and crime-fraud exception apply to a partnership and what role, if a Icy principles play in the application of the crime-fraud exception. To prow context for these issues, we pause for background on the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine, as well as the crime-fraud exception. + +The attorney-client privilege attaches, of course, to confidential communications between an attorney and client for the purposes of securing legal advice or assistance.6 See In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d 1223, 1224 (11th Cir. 1987). The purpose of the privilege is "to encourage full and communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promo oader public interests in the observance of law and administration of jtyS United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 562 (1989) (internal quotatio tnitted). + +Attorney work product protection extends to 1 obtained or prepared by counsel in the course of their legal duties p 4 t the work was done with an eye toward litigation.See Fed. R Civ r\ 3)(A); Cox v. Adm'r U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1421-22 1 Ci . 1994). Work product protection prevents most inquiries into at s work files and mental impressions. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U. C49 I, 510 (1947). The purpose of this protection is to to protect the integrity o adversary process by allowing a lawyer to work "with a + +6 Th • ets of attorney-client communications claimed to be privileged that are potential) t n this appeal. First, there are communications between C&S and its clients in Colo e alien tort cases. Second, there are communications between C&S and its outside se in the defamation case. In the first category, C&S is serving as the attorney; in the second &S is the client. With respect to the attorney-client privilege, as opposed to the protections for attorney work product, Drummond seeks discovery of attorney-client privileged materials only from the defamation case—that is, Drummond seeks to use the crime-fraud exception to pierce the attorney-client privilege only with respect to communications where C&S was the client. We thus do not address whether the crime-fraud exception could apply to privileged communications between C&S and its clients in Colombia, who are not alleged to have participated in any wrongdoing. + +7 With respect to attorney work product, Drummond seeks to discover materials from both the alien tort and defamation cases that C&S claims are protected. + +certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by opposing parties and their counsel." Id. + +But the protection afforded to work product is not absolute. Discovery may be had into factual work product upon a party showing "substantial need for the materials to prepare its case" and that it "cannot, without undue hardsl btain their substantial equivalent by other means." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Greater protection is given to the attorney's opinion work product aterials containing "the mental impressions, conclusions, op i ' or legal theories of a party's attorney or other representative concern'4 c igation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(B). Such materials "enjoy[] a n r s ute immunity and can be discovered only in very rare and extra circumstances." Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422 (internal quotation mar lst ) + +The crime-fraud exc Ctio , allows a party—in rare circumstances—to obtain t discovery that otherwi riould be protected by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney wor, t doctrine. The crime-fraud exception applies when a twopart test i ed: + +there must be a prima facie showing that the client was engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct when he sought the advice of counsel, that he was planning such conduct when he sought the advice of counsel, or that he committed a crime or fraud subsequent to receiving the benefit of counsel's advice. Second, there must be a showing that the attorney's assistance was obtained in furtherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity or was closely related to it. + +In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d at 1226. Stated simply, the crime-fraud exception removes the "seal of secrecy" from attorney-client communications or work product materials when they are made in furtherance of an ongoing or future crime or fraud. Zolin, 491 U.S. at 563; see Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422 (recognizing that the crime-fraud exception "applies to work-product in the same way applies to the attorney-client privilege"). When the crime-fraud excepti 0 ;es, an attorney's opinion work product is discoverable. Cox, 17 F a 2. With these principles in mind, we now turn to the questions rais is appeal. + +# III. SCOPE OF 1NTERLOCUTORk UNDER § 1292 + +The federal courts of appeals "have ' \* ' iN6n of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the f rt es." 28 U.S.C. § 1291. "A final decision is one by which a dis disassociates itself from the case . . . ." Doe No. I v. United States d 999, 1004 (11th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). It "e litigation on the merits and leaves nothing more for the court to dob xecute the judgment." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "Discov are ordinarily not fmal orders that are immediately appealable." A s Id. + +There are, however, exceptions to the rule that only final decisions are appealable. We have discretion to hear interlocutory appeals from district court orders under the certification procedure in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b): + +When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order. The Court of Appeals which would have jurisdiction of an appeal of such action may thereupon, in its discretion, permit an appeal t be taken from such order, if application is made to it within ten days er the entry of the order .. .. + +28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We have explained that when deciding S o .- permit an appeal under § 1292(b) after a district court has entered an certifying the appeal and a party has filed a timely application f ion to appeal, we are considering not whether we have jurisdictio e appeal but instead whether to exercise our discretion and ). See McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 381 F.3d 1251, 125 2004). + +Our precedent identi ) 1 principles to guide us when deciding whether to exercise o disc r ton under § 1292(b) to allow for a rare interlocutory appeal. Id. at 1 eneral, we exercise our discretion only when (1) the appeal pre pure question of law, (2) the question is controlling of at least a subs of the case, (3) the district court identifies the question in its order, (4) there are substantial grounds for differences of opinion on the question, and (5) resolution of the question may reduce the amount of litigation necessary on remand. Id. But even if all of these factors are present, we still have discretion to disallow the appeal. See id. + +After considering these guiding principles, we conclude that the motions panel improvidently granted permission to appeal, vacate in part that earlier order, and decline to exercise our discretion to decide the first question presented in this appeal. Paraphrased, the first question asks whether a court may apply the crimefraud exception to a partnership by imputing to the partnership the act' and knowledge of a partner. C&S argues that the district court impr used agency principles to impute Collingsworth's intent to commit a fra> o e to C&S in determining that a crime or fraud occurred and that t vant communications or work product were made in furtherance of that + +At first blush, the core issue of wh i applying the crime-fraud exception, a court may impute a partn appears to raise a purely legal But C&S concedes that in some circumstances, such as wh C a y s managing partner or partner charged with responsibility to make td ecisions at issue participates in the fraud, a partner's intent may to the partnership. So it cannot be that this appeal presents the abs ly legal issue whether agency principles ever may be used to impute a er's knowledge and intent to a partnership for purposes of applying the crime-fraud exception. A\iin wledge and intent to a partnership + +Instead, C&S seeks in effect to have us review whether, given the nature of Collingsworth's relationship with the firm, the record supported the district court's application of agency principles to impute his intent and actions to C&S. This question is not purely one of law about whether agency principles can be imputed for the purpose of applying the crime-fraud exception. + +To the contrary, the question posed here requires a fact-specific inquiry into whether the evidence in this case—which showed, at a minimum, that Collingsworth was the C&S partner to whom Scherer, the mana rtner, had delegated responsibility for the alien tort cases and who als se s the primary point of contact for the firm's outside counsel in the lion cases—is sufficient to support the application of agency in the crime-fraud context. To answer it would require the c the case and thus to take a deep dive i i's 'case's voluminous record. The purpose of § 1292(b) is not to i(c?i nterlocutory appellate review of such factdriven issues. See McFarl 3 1 .3d at 1262. Accordingly, we conclude that permission to appeal issue was improvidently granted, and we decline to exercise our n to hear an interlocutory appeal related to the first question. ply law to the particular facts of + +### IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS + +ow turn to the second question raised in this appeal, which we do exercise our discretion to answer. To clarify the question, we rephrase it slightly as follows: + +Can the crime-fraud exception be applied to overcome attorney work product protection when the attorney or law firm was engaged in the crime or fraud but the client was not? + +With this question, C&S in effect seeks to bar the disclosure of work product materials created in the alien tort actions, claiming that because its clients in those cases were innocent of any wrongdoing, work product protection is manned AS despite the firm's participation in the wrongdoing, + +We hold that the district court properly concluded th Qe1e-fraud exception may be applied because illegal or fraudule duct by an attorney alone may suffice to overcome attorney work p tection.9 We have previously recognized that in cases of att onduct there is no protection for the attorney's work product. See a t . Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262, 1271 (11th Cir. 1983). In Parrott, a party that his attorney's secret recordings of conversations with two wi ess were protected from discovery as work product. Id. at 1270-71. We di ra, concluding that because the attorney's clandestine recordings w ical,'° regardless of whether they were work product, they + +case. in, this issue relates only to materials from the alien tort cases, not the defamation + +9 We review de novo a question certified for interlocutory review under § 1292(b). v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 148 F.3d 1228, 1229 n.3 (11th Cir. 1998). + +1° At the time we decided Parrott, an ABA opinion concluded that it was unethical for an attorney to make a clandestine recording, even when such recording was legal under state law. 707 F.2d at 1271 n.19 (11th Cir. 1983). That ABA opinion has since been withdrawn. See ABA Comm. on Ethics and Prof 1 Responsibility, Formal Op. 01-422 (2001). We express no opinion whether an attorney who makes a clandestine recording today acts unethically. + +were not protected. We relied on a D.C. Circuit decision recognizing that "in some circumstances, a lawyer's unprofessional conduct may vitiate" the protection afforded to attorney work product. Id. (quoting Moody v. I.R.S., 654 F.2d 795, 799-801 (D.C. Cir. 1981). The D.C. Circuit explained in Moody that "[a]n attorney should not be able to exploit [work product protection] for ends outsid sko and antithetical to the adversary system any more than a client who to use the privilege to advance criminal or fraudulent ends." Moody, at 800. Based on this rationale, an attorney may not exploit work p protection when she engages in illegal conduct or a fraud upon the court even if her client is innocent.' I Of course, for the crime-fraud exception , I court must find that the specific document or testimony that is ordering to be produced reflects work of the attorney that was r dinfiutherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity or that csely related to it. + +t To support its c ory position, C&S cites several cases holding that an innocent die s ilege cannot be overcome by the crime-fraud exception. But most of es consider the scope of the attorney-client privilege rather than + +&quot; Our conclusion today is consistent with the holdings of other circuits that the crimefraud exception may vitiate the protection afforded attorney work product in cases where an attorney commits a crime or fraud. See In re Impounded Case (Law Finn), 879 F.2d 1211, 1213- 14 (3d Cir. 1989) (allowing crime-fraud exception to overcome work product protection for "materials relating solely to possible criminal activity of [a] law firm"); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir. 1981) (concluding that fraud exception allowed disclosure of work product when the lawyer, not client, was alleged to have engaged in the fraud). + +the relationship between the crime-fraud exception and the attorney work product doctrine. Moody, the case on which we relied in Parrott, warrants further discussion, however. + +In Moody, the D.C. Circuit recognized that the work product doctrine "create[d] a legally protectable interest in non-disclosure in two parti 1wyer and client." 654 F.2d at 801. The D.C. Circuit explained that "the li ion that an attorney has no right to object to the disclosure of work pro oche possible by his misconduct does not necessarily mean that the w duct privilege is inapplicable to such documents" because "the c • erest in preventing disclosures about his case may survive th e of his representation by an unscrupulous attorney." Id. C&S relies is reasoning to argue that the crimefraud exception may not be us q rce work product protection when the underlying client is irmoce Cbe i se the innocent client may still invoke the doctrine. + +'4 1.4r. We di ith C&S's position. Moody went on to explain that to deter= er an innocent client may rely on the work product doctrine to shield rials after his attorney engaged in a crime or a fraud, "[a] court must look to all the circumstances of the case ... to decide whether the policy favoring disclosure outweighs the client's legitimate interest in secrecy" and prevent disclosure when it "would traumatize the adversary process more than the + +underlying legal misbehavior." Id. Rather than adopting a blanket rule that the crime-fraud exception does not apply when there is an innocent client, the D.C. Circuit adopted a balancing test to weigh the client's interest in secrecy against the reasons for disclosure. Because we agree with the D.C. Circuit's application of this balancing test, the crime-fraud exception may apply to work prod attorney but not her client is accused of misconduct.I2 We there argument that the client's innocence is an absolute bar to p orney work product protection through the crime-fraud exception hen the ACIect C&S's + +We resolve the pure legal issue presen • terlocutory appeal by holding that the crime-fraud exception 4\m a plied to eliminate work product + +12 To support its position tha a e-fraud exception cannot apply to overcome work product protection when a client C&S also points to several decisions holding that an innocent attorney may invoke t protection even if his client committed a crime or fraud using his services. See, e. e Grand Jury Proceedings #5 Empanelled Jan. 28, 2004, 401 F.3d 247, 252 (4th C 2005) "[T]hose seeking to overcome the opinion work product privilege [using the crim exception] must make a prima facie showing that the attorney in question was awa or a owing participant in the criminal conduct." (internal quotation marks omitted)). thing to C&S, because an innocent attorney may continue to rely on the attorney wo ct octrine when his client engaged in a crime or fraud, the converse must also be ent client may invoke work product protection even if her attorney cornnu e or fraud while providing services. We disagree. C&S's position would, in effect, gr an innocent client a right to veto any application of the crime-fraud exception to his attorney's oric product. We cannot agree that a client's interest in preventing disclosures about his case means that the crime-fraud exception may never apply when the attorney, not the client, engaged in misconduct. Instead, a court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the policies favoring disclosure of such materials outweigh the client's legitimate interest in secrecy in a particular case. + +13 To the extent that C&S disagrees with the district court's application of the crime-fraud exception under the facts of this case, it would be quibbling with the way that the district court balanced the clients' interests in secrecy against the need for disclosure in these particular circumstances, which would not raise a pure issue of law appropriate for review under § 1292(b). + +protection based on attorney misconduct when the client is innocent. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.14 + +# V. CONCLUSION + +Regarding the first question certified on appeal, we decline to exercise our discretion to answer whether agency principles may be used to apply fraud exception under the facts of this case. We will not answer A' i estion because it does not present a purely legal question. This C , ier order granting permission to appeal is vacated as improvid ted as to that question, and permission to appeal on that ques ied. + +Regarding the second question ce 'peal, we conclude that the crime-fraud exception may in appro a es be applied to overcome work product protection based on a rte sconduct, even if the attorney's client is innocent of any wrongdoin o. A fordingly, we affirm the district court's order on the crime-fraud excep + +rcS" + +'...) + +14 On remand, under the district court's order, the special will perform an in camera review of certain categories of documents that C&S and Collingsworth contend are protected by the attorney client privilege or work product protection. To conclude that the crime-fraud exception applies to require disclosure of any specific document, the special must find that the document either (1) reflects a communication used to further a crime or fraud or was closely related to it or (2) was created to further a crime or fraud or was closely related to it. See Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422; In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d at 1227. + +Question 1 is **DECLINED**, the earlier order granting permission to appeal is **VACATED**, and the petition for permission to review is **DENIED**. + +Question 2 is **ANSWERED**. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a8d4ab16ea8db8c21fcb3507b96be08e52b7673 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766/EFTA02766766.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1634 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766766.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 33, + "chars": 46213, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF HIS \nSUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND \nNON-PRIVILEGED NATURE ,OF DQCUMENTS, ETC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 515.6119384765625, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 515.6119384765625, + 360.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 360.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 77.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 77.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 450.363037109375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 450.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS \nFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 455.927978515625, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 455.927978515625, + 180.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 180.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 482.60321044921875, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 482.60321044921875, + 185.51043701171875 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 185.51043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Collingsworth and C& esentation of Colombians Suing \nDrummond", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 488.7107238769531, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 488.7107238769531, + 455.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 455.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Drummond's Defamation Action Against Collingsworth and C&S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.7655029296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.7655029296875, + 89.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 89.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Drummond Files a Defamation Action and Seeks Discovery About \nWitness Payments.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 100.0787353515625 + ], + [ + 523.3753662109375, + 100.0787353515625 + ], + [ + 523.3753662109375, + 132.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 132.63043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Through Discovery, Additional Witness Payments Are Uncovered.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.4690551757812, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.4690551757812, + 185.00091552734375 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 185.00091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Drummond Seeks Sanctions and Raises the Crime-Fraud Exception.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 530.1917114257812, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 530.1917114257812, + 152.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 152.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. The District Court Applies the Crime-Fraud Exception.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 457.56280517578125, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 457.56280517578125, + 635.8804168701172 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 635.8804168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. A Motions Panel of This Court Granted C&S Permission for an \nInterlocutory Appeal.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.658935546875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.658935546875, + 104.51043701171875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 104.51043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. BACKGROUND \nATTORNEY WO \nATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, \nCT DOCTRINE, AND CRIME-FRAUD \nEXCEPTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 522.0499267578125, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 522.0499267578125, + 479.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 479.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. SCOPE OF 1NTERLOCUTORk UNDER \u00a7 1292", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 504.92169189453125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 504.92169189453125, + 346.2509460449219 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 346.2509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 390.0736389160156, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 390.0736389160156, + 572.1304168701172 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 572.1304168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "V. CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 374.73779296875, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 374.73779296875, + 153.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 153.63043212890625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766766" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b54b7630c14b5c98b3fae2c0838c3ca71e2b3f53 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +INTERVENORS' JOINDER IN [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS +FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER + +Intervenors, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby join +in [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]' Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order in order to protect their +interests in the non-disclosure and return of their privileged materials. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been filed electronically in compliance with +Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.515 and 2.516(e), and a true and correct copy +furnished to all counsel on the attached service list, by E-Serve this 6 day of April, 2018. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()JAY HOWELL +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +E-Mail: jay@jayhowell.com +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Tel: (904) 680-1234 +Fax: (904) 680-1238 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Intervenors' Joinder in a a Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +And + +By: is/ Paul G. Cassell + +PAUL G. CASSELL + +S.J. Quinney College of Law at + +the University of Utah + +383 S. University St. + +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Utah Bar #6078 Admitted Pro Hac 4s) ,SP + +(801) 585-52021 + +cassellp@law.utah.edu + +This daytime business address is provided for contact purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. + +Case. No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Intervenors' Joinder in a. 2.11 Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Rockenbach, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. ScottOlinkrocklaw.com KaraOlinkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian. Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach .A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, S West Palm Beach, 3340 Phone: (561)-721 Attorneys for Oy wards + +gI lle@prlsticescom Esquire 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 A Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq; David J. Vital; Jr SEARCY DEN BARNHART & S 2139 Palm West P isx@ ke IA Y, P..t+i. Lakes Blvd. FL 33409 corn w.com cylaw.com and + +f Shi ip M. Burlington "y/Nicole J. Segal BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACK P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 721-0400 Attorneys for Respondents pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com Attorneys for \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ed27c07c5aa273b8f9cb18a76cf93db2e2e59b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799/EFTA02766799.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766799.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2964, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "INTERVENORS' JOINDER IN [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.4600067138672, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 119.9630126953125 + ], + [ + 250.4600067138672, + 119.9630126953125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766799" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48efca34a9df9c7496a6aa56458271a5c18a5a81 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.md @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTE ividually, J. I , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AGREED ORDER DIRECTING CLERIC<2; SEAL FILINGS + +THIS MATTER, coming before the Court upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein")Motion to Make Court Records Confidential. The Court, pursuant to its ruling at the March 8, 2018, hearing, and being advised of the agreement of the parties, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. + +The following information is provided pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(3) and 15th Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 2.303-3/18: + +- (A) Type of Case: Civil. +- (B) \ Grounds under subdivision (c) for determining the information confidential: The Court deeriis the items to be filed under seal confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(c)(9) because Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. (`a) and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe ("Intervenors') have asserted a claim of privilege over the documents. + +04 + +(C) Whether any party's name is determined to be confidential and, if so, the particular pseudonym or other terms to be substituted for a party name: The Court is sealing the items listed below in their entirety. Should any documents later be unsealed, the documents will be redacted and pseudonyms and initials will be used for Intervenors Jane Doe, E.W. and L.M.Jand any other persons the Court deems appropriate. + +(D) Whether any progress docket or similar records generated to document activity in the case are determined to be confidential: No. + +(E) The particular information that is determin fidential: + +- Disc labeled "Epstein MS +- The following documen4Sein Sdentified on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List (the gray of which and the Intervenors have claimed as privileged): + +| Ex. No. 13-1 | No. 02645 | App. No. | +|--------------|-------------|----------| +| 13-2 | 03037 | 54 | +| 13-3 | 03036 | 55 | +| 13-4 | 00149 | 35 | +| 13-5 | 01527 | 3 | +| 13-6 | 04493-04495 | | +| 13-7 | 00014 | 36 | +| 13-8 | 03998-04000 | 6 | +| 13-9 | 02231 | | +| 13-10 | 01300 | | +| 13-11 | 00090 | 37 | +| 13-12 | 02906-02908 | | +| 1343 | 00133 | 68 | +| 13-14 | 11237 | | +| 13-15 | 08006 | 31 | +| 13-17 | 00026 | 70 | + +| Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|-------------|----------| +| 13-18 | 01464 | | +| 13-19 | 01004 | 71 | +| 13-20 | 01403 | | +| 13-21 | 02684-02685 | 51 | +| 13-22 | 01475 | | +| 13-24 | 03694 | 79 | +| 13-25 | 12289 | 33 | +| 13-26 | 01166 | 38 | +| 13-27 | 01258 | 72 | +| 13-28 | 15113-15114 | | +| 13-30 | 26481 | | +| 13-31 | 26394 | | +| 13-33 | 25922 | | +| 13-34 | 26480 | 60 | +| 13-35 | 26356 | | +| 13-36 | 26570 | | +| 13-37 | 00992 | | +| 13-40 | 01423 | 7 | +| 13-41 | 05071 | | +| 13-43 | 02043 | 81 | +| 13-44 | 03731-03732 | | +| 13-45 | 06406-06408 | | +| 13-46 | 01686 | 48 | +| 13-47 | 11123-11125 | 50 | +| 13-48 | 02088 | | +| 13-49 | 11126-11127 | 32 | +| 13-50 | 11128-11131 | 49 | +| 13-51 | 08459 | | +| 13-52 | 25925 | | +| 13-53 | 25874 | | +| 13-54 | 08348-08349 | | +| 13-55 | 08355 | | +| 13-56 | 11145 | | +| 13-60 | 03191-03192 | 4 | +| 13-61 | 27284 | 87 | +| 13-62 | 26893 | 89 | +| 13-64 | 01255 | | +| 13-65 | 26836-26837 | 90, 91 | + +NOTA AND FILED COPY + +| Ex. No. | No. | App. No. | +|---------|------------------------|---------------| +| 13-66 | 04398-04402 | 2, 34 | +| 13-67 | 04408-04412 | 1 | +| 13-68 | 26807 | 92 | +| 13-69 | 26808-26809 | 93 | +| 13-70 | 27379 | 94 | +| 13-71 | 27293 | 95 | +| 13-72 | 26021 | 63 | +| 13-73 | 27270 | 96 | +| 13-74 | 27355 | 97 | +| 13-75 | 27325 | 100 | +| 13-77 | 27322 | 101 | +| 13-78 | 26777-26781 | | +| 13-79 | 26782-26786 | 102, 103, 104 | +| 13-80 | 26088-26089 | 105 | +| 13-81 | 25998 | 52 | +| 13-83 | 27072 | 108 | +| 13-85 | Legamaro
Depo Ex 6 | | +| 13-86 | 26747 | 11 | +| 13-88 | 08042-08044 | 16 | +| 13-89 | 26741-26742 | 13, 15 | +| 13-90 | 08059-08061 | 17 | +| 13-92 | 27522 | 109 | +| 13-93 | 26756-26758 | 9 | +| 13-94 | 08036-08038 | 19 | +| 13-96 | Legamaro
Production | | +| 13-97 | 26762 | 8 | +| 13-98 | 01117 | 21 | +| 13-99 | 27051-20752 | 112 | +| 13-100 | 08121-08123 | 20 | +| 13-101 | 26749-26752 | 23 | +| 13-102 | 08128-08130 | 24 | +| 13-103 | 08118-08120 | 22 | +| 13-104 | 08131-08133 | 25 | +| 13-105 | 08124-08126 | 26 | +| 13-106 | 08135-08138 | 10 | +| 13-107 | 27494 | 27 | + +NOTA COPY + +| Ex | No | a No | App No | +|----|------|--------------|---------| +| 13 | -108 | 26760 | | +| 13 | -109 | 27025 | 111 | +| 13 | -110 | 25997 | 28 | +| 13 | -111 | 25937 | 67 | +| 13 | -112 | 26973 | 84 | +| 13 | -113 | 26604 -26605 | 56 i | +| 13 | -114 | 26737 | 57 c | +| 13 | -115 | 26485 | 57 | +| 13 | -116 | 07019 -07021 | | +| 13 | -117 | 27013 | " 0 4 8 | + +(F) Identification of persons who are pennitted t4ew the confidential information: . Unless and until ordered by this Court, only this Court and the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall be able to view the items under seal. + +(G) The Court finds that (i) duration, and manner of confidentiality ordered by the Court are no broader th nto protect the interests set forth in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2. 0(c); (ii) no less restrictive measures are available to protect the interests set forth in subdivis n (c). + +(H) The Clerk of Court is directed to publish the order in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(4). + +The items identified above shall remain under seal until further order of this Court. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach • un Florida this 6 . day of April, 2018. + +> THE HO DO LD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT COUR JUDGE + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Rachel J. Glasser +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Rachel@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Rachel@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +[jayhowell.com](http://jayhowell.com) +*Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.* +*and Jane Doe* + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74b9752c0b534275ff44b7bfdb5c5ca5e70bc722 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802/EFTA02766802.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766802.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 13181, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 535.2938232421875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 535.2938232421875, + 124.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 124.4730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER DIRECTING CLERIC<2; SEAL FILINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 462.6618347167969, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 462.6618347167969, + 354.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 354.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 341.699462890625, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 341.699462890625, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 252.75599999999997, + 153.09 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 254 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 247 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766802" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c399c06dda652dd7b05689a10f4c8e17fe7c5c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.md @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +OT J. ividually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE + +Defendant Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.140, hereby files this Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint with Prejudice, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +- 1. The Second Amended Complaint pleads a single count against Defendant Scott Rothstein for Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process.' That count is subject to dismissal with prejudice for the following independent reasons. + +## A. Failure to Properly Plead Elements of Civil Conspiracy. + +- 2. First, the Second Amended Complaint fails to properly plead the elements of a civil conspiracy, which are: (1) an agreement between two or more parties; (2) to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act by unlawful means; (3) doing of some overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy; and (4) damage to plaintiff as a result of the acts + +1A copy of the Second Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. + +performed pursuant to the conspiracy. Laterza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 221 F. Supp. 3d 1347, 1352 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (applying Florida law). + +3. Plaintiff, however, does not plead with whom Rothstein entered into an agreement to commit the tort of "abuse of process." The closest Plaintiff comes is paragraph 36, wherein Plaintiff alleges: + +Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as part of a plan to defraud investors and further the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knEK;vshould have known of efforts to make illegal, improper, an erted use of the civil process. + +(Emphasis added). + +4. Nowhere in paragraph 36 does a' t entify the alleged other party to this purported "agreement." ldentificati second party to the agreement is necessary because "an action for . . . conspiracy to commit any tort . . . requires that there has been a combination of two or more persons (or entities) seeking to accomplish an unlawful act or to accomplish a lawful act by unlawful means. The actors must have a common purpose." Buckner v. Lower Fla. Keys Hosp. Dist., 403 So. 2d 1025, 1029 (Fl DCA 1981). If the other party to this supposed agreement was a corporate r example, the tort of civil conspiracy may not lie. See id. ("Since a corpora n st act through its officers, directors, or employees, it is well settled that a corporation cannot conspire with those persons unless the individual has a personal stake in the activity apart from that of the corporation."). And, even if that party was Defendant (who Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed from this litigation nearly 6 years ago), Plaintiff should still be required to clearly plead this fact to allow Rothstein to understand exactly what Plaintiff is charging him with. + +5. Second, Plaintiff has not adequately pled damages necessary to sustain a civil conspiracy claim. Plaintiff's two damage categories are: (1) "the cost of installing an enhanced security system and retention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property;" and (2) "additional and unnecessary attorney fees and costs." + +6. As to the first category of damages, Plaintiff-does not plead that he knew about the purported abuse of process at the time it occurred (and it is clear from discovery in this nearly decade old case, as well as from the allegations in the original 2009 Complaint, that Plaintiff did not learn about the Ponzi scheme until after its implosion in November 2009). Thus, any purported costs for security were not caused by Rothstein's actions, as Plaintiff could not have installed the security system until after the purported abuse of process ended and after Rothstein was already in custody. + +7. As to the zsecond category of damages, attorney's fees incurred in connection with(PINfiffs defense of the sexual molestation claims being pursued by his many victiniC) not a compensable category of damages because all of the actions purportedly taken by are protected by Florida's litigation privilege. LatAm Investments, LLC v. Holland & Knight, LLP, 88 So. 3d 240, 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). + +# B. There is No Viable Underlying Tort. + +8. The Second Amended Complaint is also subject to dismissal with prejudice because there is no valid underlying tort to the purported conspiracy claim against Rothstein. An actionable conspiracy requires an actionable underlying tort or wrong. Florida Fern Growers Assent Inc. v. Concerned Citizens of Putnam County 616 So. 2d 562, 565 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) + +9. As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Levin, Middlebrooks. Mabie, + +Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co. 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994): + +[A]bsolute immunity must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the act involves a defamatory statement or other tortious behavior such as the alleged misconduct at issue, so long as the act has somikialation to the proceeding. + +10. Plaintiff was being sued by E.W., Jan d L.M. for numerous sexual assaults when they were minor children, an ;1st , victims were pursuing claims for both compensatory and punitive dama She alleged abusive litigation tactics by Defendant (who, again, m r m not have been the party to the purported conspiracy pled against Rothstein);" outlined in the Second Amended Complaint, clearly have at least "some relation" to the then-pending sexual assault claims and are therefore protected by Florida's litigation privilege. See id. + +# C. Dismissal with Prejudice is Appropriate. + +11. Plaintiff filed his action against Rothstein on December 7, 2009. The now operative pleading, the Second Amended Complaint, was filed on August 24, 2012, nearly six (6) years ago. Since filing the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has taken no action to move this case along. He has taken no discovery related to Rothstein, he has set no depositions related to Rothstein, and, in fact, it appears that Plaintiff did not even understand that the Second Amended Complaint was the operative pleading against Rothstein until raised the issue in a Motion to Sever filed last month. + +12. Florida law supports the dismissal with prejudice of a dilatory claim such as Plaintiffs case against Rothstein. Specifically, in Tropicaire Enose Serv. Coro. v. Chrysler Airtemp Sales Corp. the Third District Court of Appeal held that a trial court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing a complaint with prejudice where the plaintiff did not move the court to set their cause for final hearing until almost a year after defendants' answer had been filed, the time for taking testimony had expired, and the plaintiff had not taken any testimony nor shown any valid excuse or cause for not having taken testimony and had not sustained the burden of proof. 97 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957). + +13. Here, Plaintiff has failed to take any action in his case against Rothstein for nearly 6 years and until recently had no idea what case he had even pled. Plaintiffs dilatory conduct shows a lack of respect for the judicial system, the Court's time, and the taxpayer funds being wasted in this nearly decade old litigation (against a defendant who, with his present sentence of 50 years" would remain in Federal prison for the rest of his life and who has no assets to satisfy any judgment). This delay is nearly 6 times as long as that found by the Third DCA in Tropicaire Eng'g Serv. Corp. to justify dismissal with prejudice, and therefore it is well within the Court's discretion to similarly dismiss Plaintiffs claim with prejudice. See id. + +14. Moreover, dismissal with prejudice is warranted under the doctrine of laches because Plaintiff's 6 year delay in pursuing his purported claim against Rothstein + +(and Plaintiffs admitted ignorance as to what complaint was actually pending) is substantially unreasonable and has resulted in undue prejudice to Rothstein. See Brumby v. Brumby, 647 So. 2d 330, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), cause dismissed, 651 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1995). + +15. According, Defendant Rothstein requests that the Court dismiss Count II of the Second Amended Complaint with Prejudice. + +4It WHEREFORE, Defendant Scott Rothstein respecffull req uests that the Court dismiss the Second Amended Complaint with Prejudi scmayyl award any such further relief as the Court deems just given the circumstan cric. ) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and co I!Ip of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list 1\_, 2018. + +r S. Nurik + +MAR S. NURIK + +Fla. Bar. No. 272817 + +E-Mail Address: marc@nuriklaw.com + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +1075 Broken Sound Parkway + +Suite 102 + +Boca Raton, FL 33487 + +Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al +15th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint with Prejudice + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Karen E. Terry, Esq. +[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com) +[ket@searcylaw.com](mailto:ket@searcylaw.com) +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +*Counsel for* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] + +Nichole J. Segal, Esq. +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +*Counsel for* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Rachel Glasser, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +*Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +*Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein* + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +![](_page_7_Picture_7.jpeg) + +# SECOND AMENDED COMPICIN + +The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Roth1tein, ("Rothstein") and J. (" ') (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: + +## INTRODUCTION + +Tis litigation has at it iw firm that has been described by a United States Attorney as a criminal enterp e. founder, Scott Rothstein — partner, is currently serving a 50-year sent 'n federal prison for selling fake settlements to unsuspecting investors. Through the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA"), Rothstein and others ' in this criminal enterprise conducted a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme which was perpetrated with fake agreements, forged signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what was essentially legal extortion, Rothstein persuaded investors, that he could pressure defendants, including Epstein, into paying astronomical settlements and further defrauded investors by convincing them to purchase fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, + +including those falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA forts' clients with claims against Epstein, to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendant made improper use of the judicial system and civil process by inter alga filing a complaint in federal court, although a state court complaint had been pending on behalf of the same plaintiff for almost a year, engaging in unreasonable and vexatious discovery and motion practice in certain underlying -actions against Epstein, making unfounded and highly charged sexual allegations in these underlying actions, and using improper investigatory tools, and causing damages to Epstein. The United States government has stated that Rothstein conspired with others to use RRA as a criminal enterprise to conduct a racketeering activity, including mail and feud, money laundering and consipiracy. + +## GENERAL ALT.CATIONS + +- 1. This is an action for damages\ex ss of fifteen thousand dollars (\$15,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs. + - 2. Epstein is domiciled in Palm Beach County, Florida. +- 3. Rothstein was at all relevant times a resident of Broward County, Florida, and the chairman, managing partner and chief executive officer of a law firm called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), whose main office was in Broward County. 14/ 1.1 is a resident of Broward County, Florida, and is licensed to practice law in the Florida. RRA. Beginning in April, 2009, and at all relevant times, was a partner in + +payments to these clients of a discounted lump sum amount. 6. During 2009 Rothstein pursued a course of criminal conduct which included a scheme to defraud various investors into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements by showing them complaints filed in the= cases against Epstein, which settlements were falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA on be. of clients, including clients who had brought legal actions against the Plaintiff, in exc lc for immediate 0 + +#### The Ponzi Scheme + +7. The purpose of the investments was to enrich stein, along with other members of RRA and others, to sustain the daily operati , and specifically, among other things, to raise capital to continue to fund in which were to be used in the prosecution of claims against the Plaintiff. + +8. At or near the time that RothsTejp an others in his firm, many of whom have pled guilty to federal crimes, were pursuint Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil case K'pie cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 02\$051XXXXMB-AB; and E. W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). + +L'iT lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant + +Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through October, 2009, in support of the massive Ponzi scheme, Rothstein made various representations to potential investors regarding the Epstein Actions, as well as other alleged claims against Epstein, including, but not limited to, the following: + +(1) That RRA had settled one case for at least Thirty Million Dollars (\$30,000,000); + +(2) That RRA had a team of investigators consisting of former law enforcement officers, including a former sheriff, who would use this sophisticated eavesdropping equipment and sift through a potential defendants garbage looking for damaging evidence that could be used to benefit RRA clients by enhancing the value of the clients' claims, and thereby engaging in tactics tantamount to legal extortion; + +(3) That Rothstein had meetings with Epstein's alleged victims and their families regarding the structured settlements; + +(4) That these victims would take a lesser settlement if paid promptly and that investors who funded these early payments would be paid their investment plus a return when Epstein paid the greater amounts to settle the claims; + +(5) That in addition to the Epsteinas, many women were lined up to settle with Epstein with claims for hundreds of millions of dollars; + +(6) That RRA attorneys would sue Epstein and disclose embarrassing information about Epstein, his family, friends and associates unless Epstein paid exorbitant settlements; + +(7) That if the Ipotential investors did not make investments as promised on a strict timetable, RRA risked being fired and would lose the cases they had against Epstein to other lawyers; and + +(8) That one .of the RRA clients felt that Rothstein had lied to her repeatedly about funding, and that she was one step away from going to another lawyer and going to the Florida Bar. + +11. RRA employed a team of investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael Fisten ("Fistenlift,rmer Broward County Sheriff and convicted felon Ken Jenne ("Jenne"). + +en and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to a, and routinely rted to and Rothstein regarding their investigations of Epstein. + +13. brought the clients Jane Doe, EW, and LM to RRA when he joined the firm in April, 2009. + +14. Rothstein approved incurring costs between \$110,000 to \$200,000 on the Epstein Actions, costs paid for as the proceeds of its massive fraud. + +15. In October, 2009, Rothstein directed investigative team to bring case files into a conference room at RRA to be examined by potential investors. Then, Fisten and Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19) boxes. + +16. On or about October 13, 2009, Kretschmar ("Kretsclunar"), usgisentative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting 't hi r partners of RRA, to look at the Epstein case files that Fisten and Jenne had sta.c the conference room. ) + +17. On or about October 13, 2009, Illinois attorney, Michael Legamaro, and his client, hedge fund operator Thane Ritchie, were also invited to.examine Epstein case files and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities who purportedly flew on Epstein aircraft. Mr. Legtunaro and his client reviewed both the flight log and the case files in the offices of RRA. 1- + +18. The Epstein case files were displayed to potential investors in RRA's office to show them that the cases against-Epstein were legitimate and that the alleged victims actually existed, all for the purpose of obtaining the investments. + +19. has given sworn deposition testimony that only a few attorneys at RRA were directly involved in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, a privilege g prepared by and other documents, clearly reflect that more than eighteen (18) RRA lawyers were involved in prosecuting the Epstein Actions. Additionally, four RRA investigators and several legal assistants and paralegals were involved in the Epstein Actions. + +20. On multiple occasions, and in contrast to sworn testimony, many RRA attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, including as described below: + +a) On May 3, 2009, =I Adler ("Adler"), a name partner in RRA, who took part with, in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, sent an email h staff and attorneys in RRA regarding depositions in the Epstein Actions; + +b) On July 17, 2009, Jenne sent an email to Erin, c lout the Epstein Actions; + +c) On July 18, 2009, sent an email to Adler, stating that "with the right moves we could force Epstein to settle for a lot of money"; + +d) On July 22, 2009, Edwards sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting. On July 23, 2009, Priscila Nascimento, one of the secretaries to Rothstein, was advised of the scheduled meeting; + +c) On July 29, 2009, Cara , an attorney at RRA working on the Epstein cases, and a former agent)for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sent an email to stating that "our best bet is to go after those close to Epstein"; + +t) In July, 2009, and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails about their lack of proof on a previously-filed motion, which claimed that Epstein was moving his assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; + +g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, sent an email to RRA attorneys called litigation strategy regarding Epstein; + +h) On August 17, 2009, sent an email to Nurik regarding a legal opinion on the Epstein matter; + +i) In the month of August, 2009, M, Jenne and Fisten, exchanged emails on approximately four occasions discussing investigative techni matters; Ati other Epstein + +j) In the month of September, 2009, emails ere) exchanged between and William Berger ("Berger"), a partner at actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. participated in the Epstein + +k) On September 11, 2009, Edwatds sent an email to Elizabeth Villar, a legal assistant to Rothstein, about Epstein's alleged asset transfers; and + +1) On September 4 arichtgain on September 9, 2009, and Fisten exchanged emails on Epstein ittgatiepr gtrategy. + +21. By August, 2 was aware that RRA' s offices were audio monitored and recorded,including ct sions on speakerphone. + +22. Beginning in October, 2009, the level of communications by and between and others, including Rothstein, described below, increased dramatically, as Rothstein was running out of money, and was in search of new victims in order to continue to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme, and coincided with Rothstein's efforts to get the investments for the Epstein actions concluded. Those communications include: + +a) From October 5, 2009 to October 18, 2009, emails were sent between and Berger, and Fisten, and and RRA attorneys regarding Epstein Litigation Strategy. + +Evidence. A b) On October 19, 2009, sent an email to Nurik on JEE [Epstein] + +c) During this same time frame Rothstein was exchan ails with the investors for the Epstein cases, telling them that if the investment w soon he would lose the client group to other lawyers. + +d) During this same time frame, specifically on or around October 13, 2009, Kretschmar and Legamaro of the investor group were shown by Rothstein the actual case files of RRA in the Epstein Actions. The Epstein files were brought to the conference room by Fisten and Jenne. + +e) During this same time frame, on or around October 21, 2011, A.J. Discala, a potential investor in the Epstein matters, sent an email to Rothstein about the private placement memoranda for the investment. + +23. On October 22, 2009, the following events occurred: + +sent an email to book a conference room for as many attorneys as possible 4 o a meeting on October 23, 2009 on the Epstein Actions. The email requested that Jeta," dler, Berger, Barry Mike Wheeler, Cam =, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; + +b) Nurik emailed about the meeting; + +c) sent an email to Pat M, another investigator on the Epstein case, regarding " new developments which require your expertise." + +- lawyer if the investment is not made right away; Epstein; + - d) Adler sent an email to RRA attorneys on Epstein litigation strategy; + - e) ME sent an email to RRA attorneys on Bpstein litigation strategy; +- f) sent an email to RRA attorneys regarding causes of action against Epstein; + - g) Adler sent an email to Roth regarding causes of action against +- 24. On October 23, 2009, the following events occurred: +- a) Jenne sent an email to Rothstein advising him of an October 23, 2009 meeting; + - b) Rothstein emailed the investors that the Epstein client is going to another +- c) Rothstein sent an email to Adler regarding ca action against Epstein; +- h) Rothstein sent to,tegamaro, counsel for the Investors, an email regarding the causes of action against Epstein. + +Based upon the foregoing, Rothstein received information from and Adler regarding causes of action against Epstein, and Rothstein then sent information regarding causes of action against Epstein to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors for the purpose of obtaining funds for the Ponzi scheme. + +25. Given the interdependence of so many RRA lawyers, investigators, and other staff, and the wide communications that necessarily accompanied the involvement of so many people, knew, or should have known, that his Epstein case files were being shown and touted to investors and that he was assisting and aiding Rothstein to close the deal with the + +investors, particularly where the magnitude of the potential settlements in the Epstein Actions was a key selling point. + +26. In October, 2009, Rothstein convinced investors to put up money to realize a substantial return emanating from the fraudulent settlement of the Epstein cases. + +27. In November, 2009, RRA collapsed and ultimately went into tcy and Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license and was disbarred by ( 3e orida Supreme Court. + +28. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in fe court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for fraud and racketeering, based on an alleged \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his own pockets, and those of his cohorts. The federal government called RRA a criminal enterprise. + +## COUNT I: ABUSE OF PROCESS - + +29. Plaintiff realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 as if they were fully set forth here. + +30. made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process as follows: + +(a) On September 11, 2008, filed a state court action on behalf of client L.M. against seeking damages. On July 22, 2009, sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting. + +(b) On July 24, 2009, M, on behalf of client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV-81092. However, was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's + +last name so as not to alert the defendant that the case had been filed. Each of the one hundred and fifty-six counts (156) is a separate cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, which provides a civil remedy authorizing damages of no less than \$150,000 per violation. Thus, sought total damages in excess of Twenty-Three Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (\$23,400,000.00). knew or should have known that highly-charged sexual allegations in that complaint that Epstein forced L.M. to have "oral sex" with him were false. a client confirmed this fact in her deposition, but never amended the complaint. + +(c) On or about October 13, 2009, Attorney Legamaro and his client, potential investor, Thane Ritchie, were shown Epstein case files at RRA for the purpose of obtaining Richie's investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by with highly-charged sexual allegations be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Actions and advance the Ponzi sc onstrated by the fact that never served Epstein with a summons and in that federal action, which action was filed long after filed and served a sta civil action on behalf of L.M. + +31. On or abtettober 17, 2009, a, who had filed a state complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W, like the one had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M. + +32. also made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process in order to bolster the case to investors by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary "discovery," making unfounded allegations, and engaging in improper motion practice, including but not limited to: + +(1) Deposing three airplane pilots employed by Epstein, and seeking a deposition of a fourth pilot; collectively, the three were deposed for over twelve hours but were not asked a single question relating to any of the claims of a clients. Instead they were asked many inflammatory questions that had no legitimate legal purpose; + +(2) Noticing and subpoenaing for deposition the following people: + +- (a) Donald Trump (a real estate investor and television personality); +- (b) Alan Dershowitz (a renowned Harvard Law Professor and one of Epstein's criminal defense lawyers); +- (c) David Copperfield (illusionist); +- (d) Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other don don% + +(3) Taking the deposition k stein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not asking any questions about cli + +targeted the foregoing in because they were close to Epstein, not because they had any connection to, or knowledgeltf the claims of clients. intent was to harass Epstein's friends, family and acquaintances; + +(4) Asking outrageous questions of the Plaintiff in depositions which had no legitimate bearing on the cases or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding the size of his genitalia, whether witnesses would leave their children alone with the Plaintiff; + +(5) Conducting irrelevant and meritless discovery by issuing a subpoena to obtain records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Baird in Massachusetts, when issues relating to Epstein's mental and emotional states were not at issue and when Dr. Baird had never even treated the Plaintiff; + +(6) Directing and filing of Notices for the following health care professionals to produce medical records of Epstein, when Epstein's mental and emotional state was not an issue in the case: + +- (a) Charles I. Galecki, M.D.; +- (b) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and +- (c) Steven R. Alexander, Ph.D.; + +(7) Directing and filing Notices to the following banks of Colonial Bank and Palm Beach National Bank, to produce all financial records of Epstin, allegedly for the purpose of obtaining records of payments by Epstein to the`alleged victims, knowing full well that the alleged victims testified to being paid in cash; + +(8) Directing and filing of Notices to obtain all records of Epstein's prescriptions and all other health related documents at two local pharmacies, when no issues of Epstein's health had been raised in the rd. Actions; + +(9) filed motions in the Epstein Actions attempting to plead a cause of action for RICO when there was no good faith basis for doing so; and + +(10) filed motions to freeze assets of Epstein without any evidence that Epstein was attempting to sequester or transfer assets and prior to obtaining a judgment against Epstein. Ultimately the federal district court found the " motion was entirely devoid of evidence of Defendant's [Epstein] alleged transfers". + +33. had ulterior motives for making these improper uses of civil process which included, among others: + +- (1) maintaining a Ponzi scheme; + +- (2) obtaining funds for the continued investigation and prosecution of the Epstein Actions; obtaining operating revenue so that RRA could continue to operate. +- (3) + +34. As a result of the above, the Plaintiff has suffered damages by incurring additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs to defend these abuses of process. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against Defendant J. for compensatory damages, interest, costs of this action, and any other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +## COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABU £ OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN + +35. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each Zeve allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28, and 30 through 32, as if they were fully set forth herein. + +36. Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as pan of a plan to defraud investors and further the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knew or should have known of efforts to make illegal, improper, and perverted use of the civil process. + +37. 7 @ctions described in paragraphs 10 through 24 and 30 through 32 constitute overt acts ce of the conspiracy. + +As a member of the conspiracy, Rothstein is liable for the acts described herein. + +As a result of the conspiracy, Epstein has been damaged by incurring additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs and the cost of installing an enhanced security system and retention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against the Defendant, Scott Rothstein, for compensatory damages, costs, interest and any and other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing y furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this 22nd day of August, 2011: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A CO Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. iS 4)C) 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. CLIS" Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1 o.olp ivir Suffolk, 0211S, + +Respectfully submitted, + +ail2lai")l qr-35-Wit Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. + +901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Bcach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9t + +WA807431AMECOM85-Second Amended Complaint - 8-17-11-11A.doex \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2560f9e3ea29b01ae6cb2e23269eaafeb4f2dec0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/EFTA02766809.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1211 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 23, + "chars": 33508, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.33, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_7.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.76, + 70.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 518.4871215820312, + 70.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 518.4871215820312, + 111.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 293.76, + 111.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 515.4749755859375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 515.4749755859375, + 342.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 342.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Failure to Properly Plead Elements of Civil Conspiracy.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 440.83563232421875, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 440.83563232421875, + 532.1835327148438 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 532.1835327148438 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. There is No Viable Underlying Tort.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 329.9713439941406, + 626.13 + ], + [ + 329.9713439941406, + 643.3000030517578 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 643.3000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Dismissal with Prejudice is Appropriate.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 358.4342041015625, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 358.4342041015625, + 533.0499877929688 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 533.0499877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.732, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 466.6010437011719, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 466.6010437011719, + 80.103515625 + ], + [ + 159.732, + 80.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND AMENDED COMPICIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 408.73211669921875, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 408.73211669921875, + 321.31707763671875 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 321.31707763671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 359.83587646484375, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 359.83587646484375, + 424.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 424.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALT.CATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.62, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 385.4805908203125, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 385.4805908203125, + 377.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 235.62, + 377.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 112.7235107421875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 112.7235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I: ABUSE OF PROCESS -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 378.3580017089844, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 378.3580017089844, + 430.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 430.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABU \u00a3 OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 518.0452270507812, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 518.0452270507812, + 334.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 334.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 389.8999328613281, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 389.8999328613281, + 195.603515625 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 195.603515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766809" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/_page_7_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/_page_7_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92632e15479102d59b92bc203bc5ecd1e54c6044 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766809/_page_7_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c1e7a8842f4dcba3981d1d03d169b5abc4e0a30df88f0b8152a9aa2cca5d8648 +size 10827 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d01a2e1cab2f952bd7b1f9788a9c3a14b787c078 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST +DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Deferred until end of day +pending submission of case haw. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11 +day of April, 2018. + +![]()DONALD HAFELE +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion for Default Against Scott Rothstein + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +brad@epllc.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com; +kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +IM=adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAC Order on Motion for Default Against Scott Rothstein + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire paul.cassell®law.utah.edu S.J. Quinney College of Law 383 S University Street Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for J. + +jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire CO 1 Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Phone: (561)-659-8300 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +'S C) + +?S' Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara®IinIcrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com; Sco .com; Angela®linkrocklaw.com; Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com; tina®li com; rachel®Iinkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 334 Phone: (561)-727-3 Fax: (561)-727- Attorneys for ffre Epstein + +Marc S. wre marc@nun com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e1d6445c6cb4f4e7617691e230f8cc8705ba83c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832/EFTA02766832.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766832.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2955, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 374.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 166.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766832" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4743a9eda08f9c8294ef41052e119cd87cce8fdb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.md @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OCOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## tc NOTICE FOR TRIAL OF SEVERED CLAIM AGAINST JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +J. by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.440(b), hereby files this Notice for Trial. + +a ' malicious prosecution claim against Epstein is at issue and is ready to be set for trial.' expects the trial will take approximately ten (10) days to try before a jury. The trial is on a claim fortualicious prosecution against Epstein. + +I Pursuant to the Fourth DCA's Order dated March 29, 2018, the Court may not enter an order setting a future trial date until May 29, 2018. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein +Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 16th day of April, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +KAREN E. TERRY +Florida Bar No.: 45780 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA COPY + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice for Trial of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein +Page 3 of 4 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CAG4081•MBAG + +Notice for Trial of= ' Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein + +Page 4 of 4 + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e1b9d92f33a120c0a5f1e293fa554ba1ff530cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835/EFTA02766835.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766835.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3473, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.00537109375, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 537.00537109375, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "tc \nNOTICE FOR TRIAL OF SEVERED CLAIM \nAGAINST JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 278.43060302734375 + ], + [ + 493.2057800292969, + 278.43060302734375 + ], + [ + 493.2057800292969, + 367.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 367.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 151.47 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766835" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766839/EFTA02766839.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766839/EFTA02766839.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4171142ae07340be519a1269fafa7e1ff62db42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766839/EFTA02766839.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +#### J. EDW DEPOSITION OF JEFF AcAICE THE LIMITED + +J. by and through unti% d counsel, and pursuant to this Court's Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pre lines dated November 27, 2017, hereby files this Motion to Permit J. E ake the Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, and as grounds therefor states as fo + +CO SA + +### h 8 2018 State Court Hearin + +1. In y h 2018, only days before the expected trial date, Epstein designated 700+ new t s in this case. Included in that disclosure were at least 49 e-mail commum "o at had been listed on ME' privilege log since 2011 and which had never been pr in this case. The e-mails were derived from a disc possessed by Epstein's former counsel, + +2. At the March 8, 2018 hearing, the Court orally ruled that all new exhibits were stricken and that Epstein is "prohibited from making any use of the 724 late-disclosed exhibits." 3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 59:15-21) + +3. During the hearing, it was revealed that Epstein (as a party) had already received copies of at least some of the privileged materials, and raised his concern t at Epstein may seek to improperly use his knowledge of privileged materials his own testimony at trial. as& 3/8/18 Aft. Tr. at 64:14-19; 63:13-23. + +4. The Court, however, made clear that its order was in reclude anything coming in through the back door which wouldn't be allowed ttyegh t ont door." 3/8/18 Aft. Tr. at 76:3-6. + +5. The discs containing privileged mate i ' il4a tsS )information derived from the discs was ordered to be turned over to the Court been made by counsel regarding Epstei confirmed compliance nor provide dissemination or use of the pri r destroyed. While representations have pll~ttce with that directive, Epstein has not himself testimony regarding his knowledge of, possession, ocuments or information derived from the documents. + +6. and Epstein' imp per retention of the disc at issue, which contends is in violation of Judge Order dated November 30, 2011. At the hearing, Judge Ray permitted certain discovery to take place to determine the scope of the violation of that court's order, including the taking of Epstein's deposition. ril 13)t018, a hearing was held before Judge Ray concerning + +## The April 13. 2018 Bankruptcy Court Ilearing + +I The Court recognized that the privileged materials at issue were likely subject to an order from Judge Raymound B. Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 52:6-19; 54:9-20. + +7. Pursuant to Judge Ray's Order, Beach County concerning Epstein's knowledge of is permitted to depose Epstein in Palm retention of the disc at issue. This line of inquiry includes whether Epstein had possession of the disc at any point prior to February 2018, when his trial counsel first learned of its contents. + +# Request to Depose Epstein + +8. Epstein will soon be in Palm Beach County for a deposition in nlauptcy Court proceeding concerning whether he possessed the d oJation of that court's order. + +9. also seeks to depose Epstein in this ca ce g Epstein's knowledge, use, possession and distribution of the privileged materi , h r via disc or electronic copy, which this Court has ruled may not be used in any w sat the upcoming trial. In addition, 1 c'r e 1ii Ray's Order and the timing of when he first acquired that knowledge. In recent , E tein has again conceded to having received and reviewed at least some e-mails list o ds' privilege log prior to the March 8th hearing. See 3/23/18 Epstein's Notice of phi cc with Court Rulings at p. 2. Although Epstein's trial counsel ordered its client y with the Court's confidentiality order by "destroy[ing] all hard seeks to confirm Epstein's Imowled copies and electr ns of the documents obtained from the i I disc:' there is no indication has complied with this instruction. See id. + +therefore seeks to depose Epstein to determine the extent of his review of privileged materials, the timing of that review, the identity of all persons with whom Epstein shared the privileged materials or its contents, as well as all other topics reasonably necessary to allow to identify and object to at trial all attempts by Epstein to utilize privileged materials in violation of this Court's March 8, 2018 ruling. further seeks to confirm that Epstein has in fact destroyed all copies of these materials, as ordered by the Court at the March 8 ih hearing. Discovery of this limited nature is necessary to ensure that this Court's order precluding "anything coming in through the back door that wouldn't be allowed through the front" is enforced. + +11. recognizes that, on November 27, 2017, this Court entered i Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines, in which it ordered that whol dditional discovery would not be permitted and that individual discovery requests~ y aallowed on a matter by matter basis, but only if the discovery requests are impact certain motions currently pending to be heard. ourt's rulings on + +12. concedes that this individual dis vest was not impacted by the Court's ruling on any motion that was pending at ts, e e Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines was entered, but the need for this discovery arose out of the recent events previous described an t the is no undue prejudice to Epstein to permit this limited discovery because it w actions in violating this Court's pre-trial order concerning the timeliness of e ibit sclosures (as well as his violation of Judge Ray's Order concerning the retention ession of the privileged materials at issue), which necessitated the need for the 1\* dis overy sought herein outside of the discovery deadline. + +enter WH Counter-Plaintiff, ting this Motion to Permit J. J. respectfully requests that the Court to Take the Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, as well as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this la day of April, 2017. + +/s/ David r. TitaCe Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +KAREN E. TERRY + +Florida Bar No.: 45780 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searc mmccann@searcylaw.com weand + +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaT ylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarol & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach yard + +West Palm Beach 3409 + +Fax: (564 + +Phone: (561) + +Attomc , ey J. + +, LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Frt, ) Primary: Scott®lin ockljuw.com Primary: Ka tlinkrocklaw.com Primary: a)linkrocklaw.com Second Seco' linkrocklaw.com S + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr Searcy, Denny, 2139 Palm B West Pal art & Shipley, P.A. h Lakes Boulevard each, FL 33409 w.com scarolateam@searevlaw.com tervteamasearevlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +,O1L( S i e" + +### RVICE LIST + +tinsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +> Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb©FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +## COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION ADVERSE INFERENCE - FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and an adverse inference may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that pplies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit. + +Therefore, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amen asked relevant questions, then you may, but are not required to, infer that incriminated him. You may consider this, together with the other ev issues of this case, but a Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein canno inference. ege when would have determining the y on the adverse + +#### Source: + +Florida Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.11a; Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976); Coquina In tments v. Rothstein, No. 10-60787-cv, 2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) + +Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766852/EFTA02766852.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766852/EFTA02766852.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e705fd6358371380eca2f5d125e972ae70d4b28d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766852/EFTA02766852.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766852.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5578, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANTCEFFil Y EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF FILING ADVERSE 1NFEJ ENCE JURY INSTRUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 323.3740539550781 + ], + [ + 491.8416442871094, + 323.3740539550781 + ], + [ + 491.8416442871094, + 357.789306640625 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 357.789306640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION \nADVERSE INFERENCE - FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.02800000000002, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 479.9403381347656, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 479.9403381347656, + 116.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 134.02800000000002, + 116.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 114.58358764648438, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 114.58358764648438, + 560.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 560.6030120849609 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766852" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07d90a02a3bcd6efb1015a5e036c9bf5306232f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF,THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IEEAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNX\$ FLQgIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040&OO134BriG 2° '. -O + +<2; a —lg. 77 rcrrn c.ri r—DA + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +GO + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +TIME: 8:45 AM + +DATE: October 21, 2010 + +4,9 + +by + +JUDGE: David F. + +PLACE: Palm Beach CounimQ6urthouse 205 N. Di way, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +## SPECIFIC MA RS E HEARD: + +Defend ti n to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Damages + +counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by + +fit)( ppOU.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this late day of Pil e ti , 20 4 . + ++6s + +JACIZSCARO A + +Flgf( (cla Bar No.: 169 + +a ny Denney Scar h + +& Shipley, + +2139 Palm B es Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone,.\ . N1i, ,),368836:96430510 + +F\ alc y i f r Defendant, J. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, F 334 -6 70 Phone: (561)-727 Fax: (561)-802 Attorneys for efR Epstein + +Marc S marc@nunlgaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b2b396b1e2cfab181695aa08054fe0177568807 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856/EFTA02766856.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766856.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2321, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.465, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 368.445, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 368.445, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 234.465, + 319.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MA RS E HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.56999969482422, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 277.9809265136719, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 277.9809265136719, + 526.5 + ], + [ + 66.56999969482422, + 526.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.308, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.0882873535156, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.0882873535156, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 253.308, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766856" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0025afb80c92468da108b74143c1ada776ddf242 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.md @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +states: Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey "Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter-Plaintiff J. ar ") Motion to take his limited deposition, and + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXX/vIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO SA + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND AQ EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO BE PERMITTED TO TAKE HI I1141ND DEPOSITION + +# 6 XNTRODUCTION ) + +Court to allow him to take Epstein's deposition to determine "Epstein's knowl , use, possession and distribution of the privileged materials," "Epstein's !mowled Ray's Order and the timing of when he fast acquired that knowledge," and "thee pstein's] review of EMI privileged materials, the timing of that review, the identity of all persons with whom Epstein shared the privileged materials or its contents, as well as all other topics reasonably necessary to allow to identify and object at trial to all attempts by Epstein to utilize privileged materials ..." (Mot. 9, 10.) + +However, no determination of privilege has ever been made. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court has already issued an Order to show cause allowing discovery focused on whether and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order. Moreover, this Court has ruled that at this point, the 47 exhibits are not coming into evidence. Link & Rockenbach, officers of this Court, will not violate this Court's ruling and try to "back door" the exhibits in. No additional information is needed by or this Court e this, including the information seeks from the expansive deposition o that proposes. + +presents this request for Epstein's depositio thYltter the expiration of a discovery deadline, already strictly enforced by this Co a tortured line of reasoning V premised on privileges this Court has never dote 8c, an obviously misguided view that S ictis this Court is unable to make its own dete ' s to the admissibility of evidence or to enforce its own orders. Does this Co lards to take Epstein's deposition in order to enforce at trial its rulings on admi i bviously, the answer is "No." + +None of the materials bout ich seeks to depose Epstein have ever been determined to be privileg s very issue, in fact, is currently before this Court. This Court's confirmation thak.4 such privilege exists with respect to those materials will eliminate any conceivable e(no matter how questionable) to seek Epstein's deposition and will expose t Motion as yet another attempt to hide critical case-ending evidence from the jury that vindicate Epstein's actions in filing suit against + +In the meantime, all of those materials are currently under seal and subject to an order prohibiting their use, and this Court (as well as ) is fully capable of recognizing if and when its orders are being violated and fashioning an appropriate remedy should that ever occur. This Court has express statutory authority to control its courtroom and the evidence that will be presented.' It neither needs nor should it be required to upset the schedule it imposed for the orderly administration of the trial in this matter just so may have another opportunity to harass Epstein. If an attempt is made at trial to use evidence improperly, this Court will address that if and when that happens. Neither the Court nor has any need of a additional deposition of Epstein to recognize, object to and address the improper use at U1 evidence that has already been specifically identified and excluded from trial. + +This Court recognized that the alleged violation of thq/NoWFfer 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order was an issue for the Bankruptcy Court, an e to be resolved in this forum. agreed and sought relief from the B urt. The Bankruptcy Court has now entered its Order setting an evidentiary i \n e d allowing discovery, including a focused deposition of Epstein, in order to dete ( s 8sr in , ther, in fact, the November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order was violated and, if y w . In other words, the issue of civil contempt and sanctions is now pending befo ptcy Judge. + +Notwithstanding the p cy Court's review of the issues related to its Order, is asking this CiU,1ltiJajereopen discovery and allow to go outside the scope of inquiry permitte the B nlcruptcy Court by allowing to ask Epstein questions that have no mle even to the issues to be tried in this case. Incomprehensibly, justifl Epstein's deposition in this proceeding is that needs to question Epstein outside of the scope of inquiry authorized by the Bankruptcy Court so that will know whether or when to object at trial to attempts to use evidence that has already been specifically identified and excluded by this Court. The reasons he offers makes no sense at all. should be denied the transparent attempt to harass Epstein and circumvent the Bankruptcy + +&#x27; See § 90.612, Fla. Stat. (Mode and order of interrogation and presentation). + +Court's jurisdiction. If is unsatisfied with the Bankruptcy Court's process to evaluate whether Epstein or his counsel ever actually violated the November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order, then recourse is before the Bankruptcy Court, not the judicial forum shopping and harassment is pursuing. + +# ARGUMENT + +argued to the Bankruptcy Court that extensive discovery was n determine the true extent of his damages. The Bankruptcy Court allowing discovery targeted to the issues of civil contempt to detc Agreed Bankruptcy Order was violated. Being denied broad cJisve level, order to s argument, November 2010 the Bankruptcy Court now runs to this Court with the ever-evolxifisvellotfnsensical claim that needs the discovery to allow him to obiect at tri "c " p n's attempt to utilize privileged materials. + +#### St\ I. A Privilege Determination Has ( Made + +Just because identified ments on his privilege log does 01 mean the documents are privileged'. k if,, in 2012, produced to Epstein more than 80 documents identified o rivilege log, consisting largely of communications between and the la, fo which, when challenged, could muster no legal justification to withhold The determination of privilege can only be made by this Court after an in camerd On April 4, 2018, Epstein filed his Supplement to Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents with a Specific Request for In Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents. Until that Motion is resolved by this + +&#x27;Epstein disagrees that the documents are privileged, but the documents and disc have been sealed and are currently the subject of a request for an in camera review.

Court in a timely manner so asC t)to delay the Show Cause Hearing." (Exhibit C.) If after taking the depositio alto , including the deposition of Epstein, believes a broader scope of ques • g s Epstein should be allowed, he can and should address those issues with the B urt. There is simply no issue before this Court that requires Epstein's deposition yond that which already has been authorized by the Bankruptcy Court. has already brought the alleged violations of the November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order to the Bankruptcy Court's attention. Specifically, on Marc 19, 2018, Edwards; moved the Bankruptcy Court to issue an order to show cause wh ler and e Epstein should not be held in contempt of court, to permit discovery sanctions and costs and for other appropriate relief. (Exhibit A, without exhibits.) anlcruptcy Court held a hearing on April 13, 201e and entered its Order to show • sting an evidentiary hearing in Augusts. The Bankruptcy Court is allowing Edw e targeted deposition discovery focused on the issues that concern both this Co a anlcruptcy Court. That is, whether or not and/or Epstein violated t ore r 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order. In its April 20, 2018, Order, the B stated, "If the parties find that additional depositions are necessary, the ng to take the deposition shall file a motion with the

Court, and unless the Court finds that the documents are privileged, no additional deposition could possibly be justified by

2. Claim of Violations of the Bankruptcy Court's Order is Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court

&#x27;Edwards filed the Motion on behalf of =, Jaffe, Weissing, M, c Lehrman, P.L. and then joined the Motion individulat purposes of this Motion, Jaffee and shall collectively referred to as ' ,, be

A copy of the April 13, 2018, Bankruptcy Court hearing transcript is attached as Exhibit B.

sA copy of the April 20, 2018, Order to Show Cause is attached as Exhibit C.

3. This Court Has Already Ordered that Epstein Cannot Use the Documents

Epstein's counsel has repeatedly advised the Court by affidavits and representation how current counsel obtained the disc, that Epstein received copies of select e-mails, and how he and his counsel complied with the Court's rulings at the March 8, 2018, hearing. See Epstein's March 11, 2018, and March 23, 2018, Notices of Compliance. Epstein's counsel has glready told the Court and counsel that Epstein was never provided with the disc only Epstein, his ethics experts and his legal team were provided with a sin Both the Court and counsel accepted Epstein's counsel's r ns: in 2018 e 47 exhibits.

And Mr. Link [Epstein's counsel] has already Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his have been no eyes laid upon these d tr e accepting that representation, as Ms-. arida those representations during the h ritg'All. to the el, that there Hence, I'm has accepted

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:20-25)6 (emphasis added). ( s As\

The disputed documents and di ve sealed by Agreed Order and, until this Court reviews the documents in earner , first on relevance and, second, if any privilege exists, they will not be presented as 4 dence at trial. That is, to quote this Court, nothing from the "front door" will com gh the "back door." Epstein and his counsel, who are officers of this Court, will by e Court's rulings and will not use or refer to the excluded exhibits unless the Ilows them to do so. suggestion that Epstein's deposition is necesst er to enable this Court to enforce its own order is absurd on its face.

request to ask Epstein questions about the subset of the 47 exhibits provided to him by Link & Rockenbach is nonsensical. What could to "allow him to object at trial"? learn from Epstein's deposition

  • I. The universe of documents is 47 exhibits.

6Excerpts of the March 8, 2018, afternoon hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit D.

  • 2. Whether Epstein studied the exhibits for five minutes or five hours does not change that fact that at this point in time, this Court has ruled that all 47 exhibits are not coming into evidence and may not be referred to at trial.
  • 3. To suggest that Link & Rockenbach would try to put a third party on the stand to circumvent this Court's ruling is absurd.

There is a defined set of documents subject to the Court's ruling — ts to be specific. Epstein's deposition regarding a subset of those 47 exhibits is c 5 sary to help or this Court determine whether any attempt is made at trj6Ro r introduce those documents or have a witness refer to them in some way. witnesses or questioning them at trial. Rather, his co s WjeOo that work, and they have already said they would not violate the Court's i 4ss ., attempt by Epstein or his counsel to ls" violateSte ruling at trial, the only time to address that is if and when it happens, not be b se it hypothetically may happen. That is, if Epstein or Epstein's counsel a t slize the 47 exhibits at trial, the time to raise an objection is at the trial. Pr at Epstein and his counsel, Link & Rockenbach, will intentionally violate this1114/c,4 's rulings are absurd and serve no basis for allowing Epstein's deposition. , Epstein is not calling is concerned about an

CONCLUSION

request to take Epstein's deposition will not help or the Court determine whether an attempt may be made to use or refer to the finite set of documents at trial. Moreover, if the Bankruptcy Court finds no violation of its November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order or this Court determines that none of the documents are in fact subject to a privilege, any remotely conceivable basis for Epstein's deposition is eliminated. Both of those issues need to

be resolved first before considering opening discovery to allow to conduct depositions outside the parameters already set by the Bankruptcy Court.

In any event, questions have already been answered and taking Epstein's deposition, outside of the scope of inquiry authorized by the Bankruptcy Court, is unwarranted and should not be allowed. Factual issues relating to the November 2010 Agreed Ahmi ankruptcy Order are properly before the Bankruptcy Court. This Court, on the other han ' charge of its courtroom and is certainly able to make the decisions at trial regardi timony and control its own courtroom or enforce its own order. Accordingly, Epstein )fu requests that Motion be denied. c evidence may be allowed. The Court does not require Epstein's d

I certify that the foregoing document Service List below on April 24, 2018, throu, of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). furnished to the attorneys listed on the 's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule

INK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [faxj

By: /s/Scort.f. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott& i nkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachelelinlcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tintalinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████

+
+

██████████ J. ██████████
+██████████ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR

MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD CO MPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY. TO ASSESS SANCTION STS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF

OM, Jaffe, Weissing. , Fistos & Lc counsel, hereby moves this honorable Court for an r ON Jaffe"), through Cause Why and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Cont C urt, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Approp , and as grounds therefore states as follows:

N

As the Court will recall f litigation in this matter, Jeffrey Epstein is a convicted sex offender who has been sued ozens of victims for sexual abuse of children. In the course of the above-captigged bankruptcy proceedings, in 2010, Epstein served a broad subpoena attempting to usands of attorney communications by Jaffe attorney J. o while previously employed as an attorney at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA") h represented a number of Epstein's victims in their civil suits against Epstein. Jaffe sought to have Epstein bear the costs of copying and stamping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel attorneys at the law firm of of the materials and return them to Burnett, P.A. ca a —would make a copy Jaffe. Because of Jaffe's obvious concern that

Epstein or his legal counsel might misappropriate these documents while in their physical possession for the limited purpose of copying and numbering them, this Court specifically ordered that `= will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers." [DE 1194]. To ensure compliance with its order in olving the transmission of highly sensitive materials, this Court specifically added an enforc rovision: "Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images o f the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdictio sanctions in favor of =, Brad or his client." [DE 1194].

Remarkably, in clear and intentional defiance of t s discovered that indeed retained a co e nfidential materials at issue—and those materials have now been passed alon i lst r 's current set of lawyers, as well as to Epstein personally. Not to put too fine int it, Epstein and his lawyers at c appear to have misappropriated t f nfidential documents, which include sensitive and attorney-client protected comm i o s about Epstein's sex abuse victims, and those documents to this day remain in the on of the victims' sexual abuser, Epstein. Jaffe recently

Ja sks th Court to enter an order to show cause, to allow appropriate discovery into the ap sconduct, and to ultimately enter sanctions and costs as may be appropriate.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

While information surrounding the apparent misappropriation of privileged documents is continuing to be revealed, it appears that the following facts cannot be reasonably contested by or Epstein and, should any of them be contested, Jaffe requests an evidentiary hearing to prove them:

1. From the 1990s through the 2000s, billionaire Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused dozens of then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Jaffe attorney J. in their civil suits against Epstein. [DE 1120].

2. filed the three sexual abuse lawsuits against Epstein in 2008 while a sole practitioner before taking the cases with him while was employed at m April 2009 through the firm's implosion in November 2009.

3. In late 2009, Epstein sued for purportedly representing his clients who were Epstein's sex abuse victims. Jetty Epst c • . Rothstein. J. and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for ch County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "t iki awsuit").

4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein sere na in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("RRA") Bankru Trus Howard Stettin, seeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which includ i nts from attorney related to representation of the sex abuse ys hile at RRA. [DE 807].

5. On May 1 I I, this Court entered an Order approving a proposed Document Production Pro delis Ling the process that the RRA Bankruptcy Trustee would use to identify doe responsive to (among other requests) Epstein's subpoena. [DE 672]. The Order this Court with jurisdiction over all discovery sought from the RRA Trustee.

6. On August 13, 2010, this Court appointed former Broward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney as Special = who was directed to work with counsel for the Trustee to obtain documents responsive to the subpoena served upon the Trustee by Jeffrey Epstein. Specifically, the Special was to: "(i) review all electronically stored information ("EM") and other

11. The Court, recognizing the trust Jaffe was being forced to place in the adversary lawyers to perform the copying and numbering without stealing the materials, specifically ordered,' will not retain any copies of the documents contained on

documents in the Trustee's possession, including Qtask I data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., and Brad and other current or former clients of =, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law." [DE 888].

7. On September 20, 2010, Special Carney moved for el n of this Court's order, suggesting that Jaffe be permitted the opportunity to e documents themselves in order to determine the applicability of privileges. [DE

8. On October 15, 2010, this Court amended [DE re the RRA Trustee to provide the emails at issue to Jaffe and requestin er Jaffe prepare the privilege log. [DE1068].

9. On November 2, 2010, L.M. filed a Motion requesting that Epstein, the party seeking the discovery, bear the • • g and other reasonable costs and attorney's fees associated with his discovery t E 1120].

10. On November 3 20 s Court entered an Agreed Order directing the law firm of Burnett, print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with num dded, hand provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special and an identi to Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman (a Jaffe"). The omeys were to then use their set to create its privilege log. [DE 1194].

I Qtask was an internal firm electronic communication platform.

the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers. Should it be determined that a or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or othenvise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of M, Brad or his client." [DE 1194].

  • 12. On December 13, 2010, 27,542 stamped documents were p rolhark to Jaffe.
  • 13. On January 25, 2011, Jaffe provided Epste O'pages of nonprivileged emails.
  • 14. On January 26, 2011, Jaffe servedjjp6teWeftith a privilege log governing the remainder of the documents.
  • 15. On February IS, 2011, Epstei Se\ d the privilege log as insufficient before this Court. [DE 1442].
  • 16. On February 23, 2t Jaffe provided Epstein with an additional 12,711 pages of emails,2 and an lege Log containing 159 pages identifying the remaining 6,471 pages of emails co privileged information that were not being produced.
  • 17. O 2011, Special Carney filed his Interim Report before this Court e,onfi at of the more than 27,000 pages of emails, all documents had been released to Eps t to confidentiality provisions, with the exception of the documents identified on

2 The 12,711 pages of documents were divided into two separate categories respectively labeled "attorneys eyes only" and MI Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails." Two boxes of "attorneys eyes only" documents were produced containing 1,829 pages of documents in the fust box andflpages of documents in the second box, totaling 5,027 pages. Two additional boxes of Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mail?' were also produced containing 3,804 pages of documents in the first box and 3,880 pages of documents in the second box, totaling 7,684 pages.

Jaffe's 159-page privilege log of February 23, 2011, which documents were not subject to discovery. [DE 1570].

18. In 2012, additional litigation ensued regarding some of the documents in state court in the Epstein lawsuit against n

19. To date, 21,282 pages of emails have been permissibly and lawfully rovided to Epstein. Consequently, 6,471 pages of emails have never been provided to be reta1 Epstein and his lawyers as they are protected by various privileges including attorr)e, t privilege and work product privilege and remain on the privilege log.

RECENT EVENTS

20. On November 1, 2017, the law firm of Li N( Ac R ) nbach, P.A. entered a Notice of Appearance in the Epstein lawsuit, pending befo "Ss, t s t aws nald Hafele (the successor to Judge M. As it has evolved, Epstein's lawsuit a itSi v was dismissed and the lawsuit now

3 Specifically, on A r• 101 d id F. (presiding over the Epstein lawsuit) entered an Order requiring to rodu any non-privileged documents identified in paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compe Amend Protective Order, which s cally only included emails relating to news re or the media. On May 7, 2012, Judge = entered an Order on Plaintiff Jeffrey Eps in's kl Lion toal Production of Documents from Defendant and for tions ating, ' shall within 30 days of the date of this order file a more co ilege log. The Court finds the privilege log is insufficient on its face and does not com ly t t e requirements of F.R.C.P. 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp. v. 799 So. 2d 33 DCA/22111n all other respects the Motion is denied at this time."

8, 2012, provided stein with 163 pages of emails pursuant to Judge A 10 Order. On Mail2012, filed a Motion for Clarification of Recent Discovery Orders before Judge On August 17, 2012, Judge granted Motion for Clarification and vacated its Order of May 12012 without prejudice upholding February 23, 2011 Privilege Log and requiring only to file written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's 110, 2012 Order.

Ultimately, following a summary iudgment motion by Epstein dropped his lawsuit• currently pending before Judge successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place.

involves a malicious prosecution claim brought by against Jeffrey Epstein. alleges that Epstein sued him, with malice and without probable cause, for representing then-minor girls sexually abused by Epstein, including L.M.

21. On March 2, 2018, Epstein, through counsel Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach, Epstein filed Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Filing of Redact Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Eviden ed in Epstein's 353-page filing were at least 49 privileged emails spanning over 1 at are subject to various privileges pursuant to the privilege log and that we A3;) ver Ily permitted to be provided to Epstein or retained by his lawyers. Epstein a tietp) only actual copies of various emails, but also provided a purported "summary" of 'Silki , which included specific quotations from communications over which attorney- p • ilege and other protections had been repeatedly asserted, by Jaffe, E L.M. Epstein also provided a wholly out-ofcontext and substantially misleadi of what he believed the emails demonstrated. In subsequent filings in court p edi , he has continued to reference the content of privileged documents and mischara heir significance in the pending state court malicious prosecution case.

22. On arch 5, 2018, filed his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Suppler1t Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Jaffe's Privilege Log.

23. On March 7, 2018, L.M. and two other minor girls Epstein had sexually abused, E.W. and Jane Doe, filed an emergency motion to intervene and an emergency motion to join

motion to strike. The three victims alleged that Epstein's recent filing disclosed their protected attorney-client communications.

24. On March 7, 2018, counsel for Epstein delivered a flash drive to counsel for "which duplicates the disc we located in files." Letter of transmittal attached hereto as Exhibit A. The subject flash drive contained three separate PDF files respectively titled: (1) a containing 8,507 pages of emai "Epstein Searches.pdf' containing 17,348 pages of emails; and (3) "Scott Rothste. tam ing 1,687 pages of emails ("subject documents"). Notably, the flash drive indi e three PDF files had been last "modified" on December 8, 2010, a mere nine da c ), ergs Court ordered to take very limited possession of the subject docu ! it)t nt and stamp them, and not to retain any copies. This was also a short fo forethe stamped documents were delivered to Jaffe on December

25. On March 7, 2018, coupsufor pstein also provided a sworn affidavit from had obtained these materials from ed under oath that on January 10, 2018, she had reviewed Epstein files at Miami, Florida offices. certified paralegal Tina L. files. Specifically, Ms. Campb TIM approximately 36 boxes o During that revie aro is discs found in the files were marked for review, but the conten, it reviewed. Affidavit attached hereto as Exhibit B. On February 1, 2018, Link bach, P.A. received three boxes from the firm containing copies of the items that had been marked for reproduction including a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" handwritten in black sharpie. The disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" was not reviewed until February 25, 2018.

26. It is thus undisputed that a disk containing the privileged emails in question was in the possession of in early January 2018—a disc showing that it had last been modified on December 8, 2010.

27. On March 8, 2018, Judge Hafele held a hearing regarding the privileged communications. Counsel for Epstein, and the three victims at issue (L.M. E.W., and Jane Doe) all appeared. Counsel for began the heating by explaini relevant background as well as how had made and retained a e privileged communications in violation of this Court's order. Counsel for Epstptnt nded, arguing that they (i.e., Link & Rockenbach) had not improperly taken a' uthnts from This argument led Judge Hafele to ask, "[t]he critical q gh, is why did have these documents, why were they continued to Ae sa was it in violation either expressly or constructively as it relates to Judge Ray's e " ring Trans. at 32:10-14 (all portions of the March 8, 2018 hearing transcript ci rein attached hereto as Exhibit C).

28. Without offering I anation in response to the Court's inquiry, counsel for Epstein simply stated, "( lk about because it is as clear as mud." Hearing Trans. at 35:6-7. 1 for Epstein further explained that "[w]hen these issues came up, we asked Fowler ease give us the original boxes. We got the original boxes and found the disc in a at says J. Carney printing on it. That's it. That's all that's on this folder." Hearin, .at 45:11-15. Epstein's counsel then conjectured certain speculative scenarios,4 but

4 Epstein's current legal counsel speculated that after a copy of the materials were provided to the Special =, Judge Camey, that Judge Carney somehow turned around, contacted and gave the disk to them. Judge Hafele, however, summarily rejected this speculation, explaining that this would require believing that Judge Candiaracted jurist," was "somehow engaged in some type of ex parte communications with " Hearing Trans. at 44:19-25.

ultimately admitted "I wasn't there. I can't tell you what I did...." Hearing Trans. at 45:23-24.

29. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein revealed that Epstein personally had retained copies of the confidential materials, in contravention of the November 30, 2011 Order. Hearing Trans. at 64:7-8 (counsel for Epstein admits that copies of the documents have been provided "within my law firm, and my client."). When further asked, "H tein been provided with copies of the documents or the contents of these privileged is?," counsel for Epstein replied, "I just said my client. My law firm and my client. say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it." Hearing Trans. 64:14-19.

t 30. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein ( ' kenbach) also revealed that was disclaiming any memory of the retention of the disc: "We have reached out c t of it." Hearing Trans. at 35:15-21. 8, ces surrounding the creation and IM. They have no memory

31. Epstein's claim t 1<t aiwe circumstances led counsel for no records regarding the firm that keeps war it o respond that it was difficult to believe had our Honor knows very well that is a very large law records with regard to the services they render. And the concept had "no memory" of the surrounding that it is im to reconstruct through those time records what was received, when it was receiv It was reviewed, what happened with it, who was informed of what was happening with it, quite frankly, is inconceivable to me." Hearing Trans. at 60:8-19.

32. Judge Hafele responded in agreement by noting his surprise that was not explaining what had happened: "And that's a good point. What I was going to point out earlier ... is that I would have expected certainly in deference to the fact that Mr. Epstein was a client of

that someone from would have had the ability to weigh in somehow as to these critical issues. Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and why they had access and kept these records in their possession in light of that [bankruptcy] court order and in light of this ongoing litigation. And as a matter of respect to Mr. Epstein and his ongoing legal team, to have made some type of a steps to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of Searing Trans. at 60:20-61:14.

33. Counsel for victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe asRN Judge Hafele to order to explain who they had distributed the sit de , materials to. Judge Hafele indicated that, in light of withdrawal tit ase in front of him, he did not have "that ability" to enter such an order directed a 'en. Hearing Trans. at 79:25-80:1.

34. Based on the foregoing f ov he past seven years, has been in possession of a disc containing o pages of documents-6,741 pages of which were privileged materials never la ly r ived by them—that they were specifically ordered not to retain in any format. Th • disc in question had the exact number of documents copied to it that pied 'at the direction of this Court on November 30, 2010. And, the subject disc was red mere nine days after this Court ordered to copy, stamp, and permanently destroy the materials from their internal system. This was also a short five days before the final stamped documents were delivered in hard copy to Jaffe by on December 13, 2010—a date after which had no lawful reason to retain the subject documents in any format whatsoever.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Based on the egregious conduct of Epstein and his attorneys, the exact fear contemplated by the parties, the Special =, and this Court when the November 30, 2010 order was entered, has alarmingly come to fruition. Despite obligations as officers of this Court to follow a specifically delineated procedure designed to protect highly confidential and privileg materials, has apparently deliberately copied and retained highly sensitive tial and privileged materials for over seven years. Recently, these materials h: •disclosed to additional counsel for Epstein and these materials remain in the poss stein personally. The misappropriation of this information has caused irreparabl tein's current counsel, Link & Rockenbach have also now filed privileged inf j ) the public court file in the v. Epstein matter (although that filing \ki s cfre ,een placed under seal) and have repeatedly referenced the privileged content ppropriated documents in other filings. Specifically foreseeing the need to ens expressly retained jurisdiction to take steps to ensure that its ord in the past. her order was complied with in full, this Court ons in the event of any breach. This Court should ied with in the future and to punish and remedy violations

thorough in coiry to the entire chain of custody detailing the whereabouts of the subject docum ievds that the true extent of its damages can only be determined through a inception and including any person who has seen or been informed of the content of said documents. To that extent, an evidentiary hearing and corresponding discovery are essential, as complete determination of the breadth and degree of complicity by and Jeffrey Epstein, both jointly and severally, is imperative to the formulation of the appropriate sanctions in this matter. Jaffe has the right to inquire as to whether the subject documents

were downloaded into the system, whether they were disseminated to third parties, and ultimately when and how they ended up in the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Stated more succinctly, the sanctions here must be commensurate with the misconduct.

Specific Relief Sought

This Court previously entered an order directing that both and E stein were not to "retain[] images or copies of the subject documents on [their] computes erwise." [DE 1194]. In light of the clear violation of that order, Jaffe nowpeMtt s Court to enter an additional order as follows:

  • 1. and Epstein are directed within sev o e entry of this order to show cause as to why they should not be held in contemp s order, DE 1194.
  • 2. and Epstein (including all east and present legal counsel) are directed, within seven days of the entry oft se• \tti r, provide to counsel for Jaffe all physical, electronic, and other informal • th possession concerning the copying, retention, and dissemination of the docum by DE 1194 (and any materials disclosing the contents of those documents), 1 (but not limited to) all information regarding the making, retention, and dissemina ese materials on and after December 8, 2010. This information shall include, but of lim ed to, any electronic or other information showing the date on which copies were u e authors of any such copies, emails or transmission of such copies, and any disc ence to such copies. Epstein (and all of his past and present legal counsel) shall also provide all correspondence and billing records related to the copying, retention, review, discussion, and dissemination of the subject documents, the stamping of the subject

5 This motion is filed on behalf of t is counsel's understanding that separate motions to the same effect will be filed shortly byMilliand by three victims with privileged materials at issue, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe.

documents, or any other activity related to the November 30, 2011 Order from the day that the Epstein subpoena was issued on April 17, 2010 through the present.

3. and Epstein (including all of Epstein's past and present legal counsel) will provide to Jaffe within seven days of the entry of this order a listing of all persons or entities to whom the subject documents (or any information derived from the contents of the subject ma en viewed and distributed, as well as a certification that ve asked for return aterials. ACZY

and Epstein and any other persons know t a r possessed these materials, including Epstein's current counsel, shall allow neu V alists appointed by this Court to search all computer servers, including back-up t e d hard-drives, for designated search terms especially found within these privileg S, While mandatory anyway, under . the circumstances Epstein and all past and nsel, as well as anyone else known or believed to have ever possessed the ma ' Is s Id be strictly ordered to maintain all possible platforms that may contain such ' information to ensure there is no spoliation of the evidence of the improper reten , ew, dissemination or other use of these materials by any person or entity.

5. Co Jaffe is permitted to obtain deposition testimony of all persons reasonably to have knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the copying, retention, or di of the documents at issue in DE 1194.

6. An evidentiary show cause hearing will be held wherein Jaffe is afforded the opportunity to inquire into the facts and circumstances surrounding the wrongful retention and resulting dissemination of the subject privileged materials, in order for the aggrieved parties and the Court to learn of the full scope of the wrongdoing. Such inquiry should include, but not be

limited to, testimony from Special Robert Carney, Jeffrey Epstein, Attorney L. Ackerman, Attorney Lilly Ann M, Jack Goldberger, Tina Scott Link, Kara Rockenbach, and the currently unidentified attorneys that Mr. Link has represented are also working on this case on behalf of Epstein from the Gunster law firm.

7. Epstein will pay Jaffe reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses connected with II , Jaffe's efforts to determine the circumstances surrounding the retention and -rekase of the NT materials and to remedy any damage caused to Famer Jaffe or its clients frr5 ention, use or release of the materials.

8. Jaffe is permitted to seek further relief you )ns after the discovery described above is completed.

Authority to Enter4/Huai Order

This Court's November 30, 2010 O c itteic , ally noted that the Court was retaining jurisdiction to enforce compliance: "Shou 1 be terminal that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject m on its compute or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions r of =, Brad or his client." [DE 1194 at 2] (emphasis added). The t Jearly has power to now award sanctions and take all other steps necessary to secu ompli

Of co 11 ederal courts have the power, by statute, by rule, and by common law, to impose s against recalcitrant lawyers and parties litigant. Carlucci v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 775 F.2d 1440, 1446 (I I th Cir. 1985). Even absent explicit legislative enactment, deeply rooted in the common law tradition is the power of any court to "manage its affairs [which] necessarily includes the authority to impose reasonable and appropriate sanctions upon errant lawyers practicing before it." Id. at 1447. Federal courts have the inherent power to enforce compliance

with their lawful orders through civil contempt remedies. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins, 943 F.3d 1297. 1301 (11th Cir. 1991). Courts also have the inherent power to sanction a party for misconduct. v. Nasco, 501 U.S. 32, 42 (1991). As the Supreme Court stated in , "[i]t has long been understood that certain implied powers must necessarily result to our courts of justice from the nature of their institution, powers which cannot be dispe sed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the exercise of all others". Id.

Before the Court uses its inherent contempt power, "[a] petitioner ' ] establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated [a] u er order." Chairs v. Burgess, 143 F.3d 1432. 1436 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting Unit t 858 F.2d 698. 700 (11th Cir. 1988)). Once such a prima facie showin • a :i ontempt has been made, the t iii cause hearing that the underlying order was not violated or that the violation w i h an inability to comply. Chairs, 143F.3d s " at 1436.The violation need not be will su port a finding of civil contempt. McComb, 336 U.S. 187. 191 (1949) ("Since the civil contempt] is remedial, it matters not with what intent the defendant did the p bit act."). Even inadvertent or partial non-compliance with orders of the Court consti vil contempt if the party has not in good faith made all reasonable efforts to comply 722 F.2d 723, 725 (I I th Cir. 1984). burden shifts to the contemnor to produce eviden

How e court finds the defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the in' then the court may cite the defendant for criminal contempt." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (stating, "[a] court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; (2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in

their official transactions; (3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command)).6

The fundamental purpose behind contempt sanctions are twofold, (1) sanctions can coerce the contemnor into complying in the future with the Counts orders or (2) they can compensate the complainant for losses resulting from the contemnor's past noncompliance. Citronelle-Mobile, 943 F.2d at 1304. See also McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191 1 o EEOC v. Guardian Pools, Inc., 828 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1987); Perfect Fit Industri . cme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 56-57 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 73 (1 ct, the Court has "wide discretion to fashion an equitable remedy for con tth is appropriate to the circumstances." Guardian Pools, 828 F.2d at 1515. Acc n States v. City of Miami, 195 F.3d 1292, 1298 (11th Cir. 1999). Such options incl t a o we daily fine, a compensatory fine, s attorney's fees, expenses to the aggrieved p , , rcive incarceration. Citronelle-Mobile, 943 F.2d 1297.Courts have broad pow fas n an appropriate sanction, including anything from entry of monetary sanctio of a final judgment on the merits against a party demonstrated to have committer d upon the court. See Vargas v. Feltz, 901 F.Supp. 1572 (S.D. FIa. 1995).

Corn sane ons generally include a fine payable to the petitioner the amount of which "is y the extent of the actual loss." Id. (citing United States v. United Mine Work .S. 258, 303-04 (1947)). Compensatory sanctions also frequently include the payment of the complainants attorney's fees in seeking the redress. Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 689 n. 14 (1978) (t[a]n equity court has the unquestioned power to award attorney's fees against a

6See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42, requiring that notice be provided in open court in an order to show cause before indirect criminal contempt can be imposed.

patty who shows bad faith by delaying or disrupting the litigation or by hampering enforcement of a court order" and "[o]f course, fees can also be awarded as part of a civil contempt penalty"); Watkins, 943 F.2d at 1301, 1304 1301; Jaeger v. Massis, No. 00-7390. 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27908 (2d Cir. Nov. 3, 2000). Courts within the Eleventh Circuit have not hesitated to impose severe sanctions pursuant to their inherent powers, including cases where a party has cted in bad faith. See, e.g., In re Mroz, 65 F.3d 1567 (11th Cir. 1995).

In light of the Court's sweeping powers to secure compliance with o S Court should grant the relief sought by Jaffe above. There can be no doub t a facie showing of contempt has been made by clear and convincing evidence and Epstein were directed not to retain copies of privileged documents. ited above show that apparently made—and indisputably retai y of the privileged documents. Sometime thereafter, Epstein also obtained a copy of the privileged documents and now numerous unauthorized people h hese ocuments and knowledge of their privileged content.

At the hearing surro iiCding e confidential materials, Judge Hafele indicated his "respectful belief that owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and they ad access and kept these records in their possession in light of that [banlcruptc rder and in light of this ongoing litigation." Hearing Trans. at 61:5-9. M has failed to come forward voluntarily. Accordingly, this Court should enter an order to show cause as to why they have not violated this Court's order. In light of Epstein's possession of the materials, he should be directed to show cause as well.

In addition, it is already clear that efforts to avoid responsibility for violating the Court's order are underway. Indeed, Link and Rockenbach has certified that instead of gathering,

cataloguing, and filing under seal all improperly acquired and retained privileged materials, it has directed their destruction, thereby impeding further investigation of the origin of those materials. Accordingly, and Epstein (including his legal counsel, past and present) should be ordered to provide all relevant discovery about how the violation occurred. To get to the bottom of this violation and be permitted to identify the necessary witnesses to be exam' ned at the anticipated evidentiary hearing before this Court, Jaffe also seeks to depose persons who appear to be in the chain of custody of the improperly copied and reta nals.

urdens, in terms of time and effort in responding to and Epstein' • ropes!' copying, retention, and Because it is clear that Jaffe is going to have to bear distribution of privileged materials, the Court should aw and his legal counsel have caused these problem Ss financial consequences. Finally, because the • a n this Court's order appears to be evolving and on-going, Jaffe requests I to a4Ek supplemental sanctions and remedies after discovery on the violation has e 'fees and expenses. Epstein third parties should not bear the

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE, Jaffe respectfully requests that this Court enter an order to and Epste sho cause why they should not be held in contempt of court, allowing discovery an entiary hearing on the circumstances surrounding the improper copying, retenti istribution of privileged materials, and allowing Jaffe to seek such other sanctions and remedies as may be appropriate following discovery on these matters. A proposed order to this effect is attached.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(D), Movant's counsel has contacted in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter without a hearing before bringing this motion. has failed to respond.

I HEREY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CMIECF subscribers, and by email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the attached service list this 19 s f March, 2018. ACZY

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the U istrict Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance wi a.' tonal qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

EDWAIWShO11PINGER LLC

By:— /s/ Bradley .1. FLBN 542075 Brittany N. FLBN 118247 EtvaNrcls AnPottins A gervLenWue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 IZollr, Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)424-2822

Attorneys for M, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 19, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certified that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

Brad

SERVICE LIST

L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976

Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 16 David P. Vitale, J Florida Bar N. • Attorney E; Primary Seam 2139 Pal West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. law 1 m; and mmccann@searcylaw.com arolateam@searcylaw.com Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. each Lakes Boulevard

Special

Phil Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esq. njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt©FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington &Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J.

Jay Howell, Esq. Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): jay®jayhowell.com 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 (904) 680-1234

Paul G. Cassell, Esq. S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: cassellp©law.utah.edu s , Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe ?

Judge Robert Carney 2281 Saratoga Ln West Palm Beach, FL 33409 954-258-9573 rbcarnev3egmail.com I f,' (se

+o

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

before the Honorable RA The above-entA id AS,auS1/se came on for hearing JD A;s RAY, one of the Judges in the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, in and for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, at 299 E. Broward Blvd., Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on April 13, 2018, commen ' 1' at or about 1:30 p.m., and the following 9 r. proceedi s w :e had. +0

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA,

Debtor.

ECF # 6325, 6326, 6344, 6

April 13, 2018

Transcribed from a digital recording by: Cheryl L. Jenkins, RPR, RMR

APPEARANCES:

SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, by JACK SCAROLA, Esquire On behalf of J.

POTTINGER, by , Esquire BRITTANY N. , Esquire On behalf of Jaffe

SCOTT LINK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH STORFER & , by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein

CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLAUCHLAN, Esquire JOSEPH IANNO, Esquire On behalf of

AKERMAN, LLP, by JOAN LEVIT, Esquire On behalf of Michael Goldberg

PAUL G. CASSELL, Esquire (via telephone) On behalf of LM, EW and Jane Doe

O)

ALSO PRESENT

EDWARD BRISCO

ECRO - Electronic Court Reporting Operator

seated. THE COURT: Good afternoon. Please be

ECRO: All rise.

MR. SCAROLA: Good afternoon.

MR. : Good afternoon, your Honor.

THE COURT: All right. Court calls the matter of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler. May I have appearances for the record?

MR. SCAROLA: Good afternt your Honor.

My name -- excuse me.

THE COURT: We hay. ( ,,> tiquated sound system in this courtroom. \

MR. SCAROLA "CS tn 'I have a booming voice, S 1. sir, so I don't think it wi l be a problem, but my name is Jack Scarola. I am counsel on behalf of

Mr. is here in a dual capacity. He has joined in the motion on behalf of his law firm, Jaffe, and is also representing Jaffe. With us also at counsel table is Brittany in this matter, your Honor. , and we are the moving parties

THE COURT: All right.

MR. SCAROLA: And I'm just reminded by the sign that I'm supposed to -- I don't need to spell my first and last name.

Okay. Thank you.

1 THE COURT: Step aside so the other parties
2 can come up to the mic.

3 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, excuse me.

4 MR. [REDACTED]: I was just introduced by
5 Mr. Scarola. Brad [REDACTED] on behalf of [REDACTED] Jaffe.

6 MR. MCLAUCHLAN: Good afternoon, your Honor.
7 Niall McLauchlan on behalf of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. I'm here with
8 my partner, [REDACTED] Ianno, at the table, and Ed Brisco, who
9 is a managing partner of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. He's here because
10 of his obvious concern about the allegations in the
11 motion.

12 MR. PUGATCH: Good afternoon, your Honor.
13 Chad Pugatch, P-u-g-a-t-c-h, here as co-counsel for
14 Jeffrey Epstein, along with Mr. Scott Link, who will
15 introduce himself.

16 MR. LINK: Good morning, Judge. Do you need
17 me to spell -- L-i-n-k, first name is Scott, S-c-o-t-t.

18 Thank you, [REDACTED]. Thank you, Judge.

19 MS. LEVIT: Good afternoon, your Honor.
20 Joan Levit for the liquidating trustee, Michael Goldberg.

21 We are not participating in this
22 disagreement. However, we just wanted -- the liquidating
23 trustee just wanted to state on the record that there is
24 no longer a bankruptcy case, as your Honor is aware. The
25 case has been confirmed, and there is a liquidating trust,

1 2 3 which we are resolving, and that this Court is aware that its authority is based on what powers were granted in the liquidating plan.

4 5 6 So, we're just monitoring the hearing, and unless your Honor needs us, we're going to be quiet for A the rest of the case. Aties .,

7 THE COURT: Thank you. Thank y Ol' r

8 9 10 11 All right. We have three matted\* on the Court's calendar today, motion for order to show cause and the responses thereto, joinder, fi d interested party ./.' , motion to inte otion for joinder

12 13 Turning to the /4 lo to intervene, is Peter Shapiro present in rtroom?

14 15 16 MR. EDW S: our Honor, I was informed that Mr. Paul Cass i l aw'to call into this hearing on behalf of L.M., .W. (': nd S.R.

17 THE OURT: I don't

18 19 MR. : I don't know what arrangements he made.

20 21 22 THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. So, we'll just -- on the motion to intervene, that will be continued. It won't be heard.

23 MR. : Thank you, your Honor.

24 25 ECRO: (Inaudible) -- an e-mail. He was right. Let's call CourtCall.

THE CLERK: Okay.

ECRO: Do you want me to print you a calendar that shows his name?

THE COURT: Can you print it here?

ECRO: I can.

...m\ r (Thereupon, CourtCall was connected.

RECORDING: Thank you for makin telephonic court appearance. Your CourtCaiiN ourt Conference operator will be with you momentarily.

OPERATOR: Thank you or tanding by. May I have the name of your Court, pleas

ECRO: U.S. Ba y Court, Judge Raymond B. Ray.

OPERATOTILTh k you. One moment and your operator will be rightNith you.

ECRO: Thank you.

OPERATOR: Good afternoon. My name is Karina with CourtCall. I'll be assisting you today.

ECRO: Thank you. We are ready for the call.

OPERATOR: Thank you, . I'll go ahead and join counsel through.

THE COURT: Mr. Cassell, are you on the phone?

MR. CASSELL: Yes. Hi, this is

1 Paul Cassell.

2 3 THE COURT: Spell your last name for the court reporter.

4 MR. CASSELL: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-1-1.

5 6 THE COURT: And who are you representing in this matter?

7 8 9 MR. CASSELL: I represent putative intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who have pending motion for leave to intervene.

10 11 (s) THE COURT: Al]. right me ask, is there any opposition to the motion to ene?

12 13 414; r 41 MR. SCAROLA: ctAiSlv behalf of the moving , party, your Honor.

14 15 opposition. : Judge, we do have some

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 It(:Ppe rs that E.W. and Jane Doe weren't even clients, weren't even part of the litigation for which the subpoena was issued. So I think the motion to intervene as to those two parties should be denied. The onitllne, i even according to the victim's reply, they say th4Nplient refers to L.M. So that's only one of the three putative intervenors. For that reason I think the motion should be denied as to E.W. and Jane Doe.

24 25 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited

1 objection.

2 THE COURT: Mr. Cassell.

3 4 5 6 7 MR. CASSELL: Yes. L.M., it appears, has not been contested. With regard to E.W. and Jane Doe, the e-mails in question pertain to all three victims. Therefore, all three victims should be allowed to intervene.

8 9 10 11 12 13 Mr. Epstein had an opportunity to file a written response where we could have provided a reply in more detail. He did not do so. Fowler filed a response, and only dropped a footnote raising a different kind of argument in opposition. So these are new arguments that are being advanced.

14 15 16 I think it's quite clear that the victims have significant and compelling interest at stake, and they should be allowed to intervene.

17 18 THE COURT: Is there any dispute that the e-mails in question refer to L.M. and E.W.?

19 20 21 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, our position is that the'e-mails refer to all three of the putative intervenors.

22 23 24 25 record, MR. McLAUCHLAN: And, Judge, just for the , we haven't seen the CD, so we don't know who is on there, but I do note that Mr. Cassell is technically wrong, because Mr. Epstein, in his response,

1 2 3 specifically said on Page 3 of his response, that two of the three intervenors, E.W. and Jane Doe, were not parties during the litigation and the 2010 order.

4 MR. LINK: Your Honor, may I be heard?

5 THE COURT: Yes.

6 7 MR. LINK: (Inaudible) -- objection. The three -- II, sorry.

8 9 10 11 12 Those three intervenors who eeeking r to intervene in this Court have been allowed to intervene without objection in the state cour p ceeding, so that can protect their attorney/A S,e4 privileges if such exist.

13 14 15 16 17 So as far a Ilse S tr h' being able to protect the e-mails, and whether they' C le going to be admissible, and whether they're confidential, the state court judge has that issue, and they are participating in that proceeding, Judge.

18 THE COURT: So I'll grant that motion.

19 Mr. Cassell, see to the order.

20 MR. CASSELL: Thank you.

21 22 23 THE COURT: All right. Let's describe, before we get started, just what we're talking about. Is it one disk, two disks? Is it boxes of goods?

24 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the ---

25 THE COURT: I just want the record to be

1 clear.

2 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir.

3 4 5 The origin of the information in dispute, we understand is a single compact disk that contains a very large number of e-mails.

6 7 8 THE COURT: And is that the disk that was referred to as -- it was in one of the pleadings, was found in a box?

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MR. SCAROLA: That's what we have been told, your Honor. We don't have, obviously, direct information of that, but we have been informed that that disk was included in one of 36 boxes that were reviewed by the law firm of Link & Sartory, obtained from the law firm, who were predecessor counsel to Mr. Epstein, and were the direct object of this Court's order prohibiting retention of that specific information.

17 18 MR. LINK: So the record is clear, it's Link & Rockenbach.

19 20 MR. SCAROLA: Link & Rockenbach, not Link & Sartory, excuse me, old firm name.

21 22 MR. McLAUCHLAN: Judge, yes, the motion alleges that there was a single -- I'm sorry?

23 24 ECRO: If you're going to speak from there ---

25 MR. McLAUCHLAN: Judge, the motion refers to

1 2 3 4 5 6 the single CD that was supposedly in files, that's correct. There was originally, my understanding is, two CDs that were delivered to for printing. Those documents were then put onto one CD, with numbers, and the documents were printed. So we now have a single CD, that's correct.

7 8 THE COURT: And is the informat contained on this disputed CD anywhere else in the sta7) ourt file?

9 10 MR. McLAUCHLAN: I'm not aware of the state court file.

11 12 13 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the information contained on the compact dis 'nbl.uded both privileged and 15t non-privileged information.

14 15 16 THE CO But it wasn't subject to disclosure, so it 4QP go to the special and privilege log?

17 18 MR. SCAROLA: If I could, perhaps it would t r be helpfX if I briefly trace the history for the Court.

19 THE COURT: Okay.

20 21 22 23 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor may recall that the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler imploded as a consequence of Scott Rothstein's involvement in a massive Ponzi scheme.

24 25 That firm became the subject of bankruptcy proceedings. A special was appointed. The special

1 2 3 4 took control of the records of the law firm, including the law firm's electronic records. At the time that that occurred, litigation was pending between Mr. Epstein and

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Mr. Epstein issued a subpoena in that state court proceeding seeking information from the electronic files of the bankrupt law firm, and the determination was made that in order to deal with privilege assertions of all of the e-mail records of the law firm, that, over Mr. ' objection, and the objection of the law firm, the electronic documents were to be turned over to so that stamped, numbered e s, extracted from those multiple compact disks. clkle i print out a hard copy of

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 This Court entered an order on November 30, 2010, recognizing the fact that was at that time representing Mr. Epstein, an adversary of Mr. in the state court proceeding, and that order expressly prohibited from retaining any copy, electronic or otherwise, of the information that was turned over to them solely for purposes of performing the administrative task of stamping and printing out copies, one to be delivered to Judge Carney, serving as Special on behalf of the bankruptcy trustee, and a second copy to go to the Jaffe law firm, so that a

1 2 3 privilege log could be prepared. All of that related to the subpoena that was issued in the state court proceedings.

4 5 6 7 8 Your Honor's order reads, in relevant part, will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the disks provided to it, nor shall any imagines or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers.

9 10 11 12 13 14 Should it be determined that or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sancti fis in favor of Brad , or his client. at order was entered in November of 2010.

15 16 17 As fa\_ as -any of the interested, protected parties, that is Farmer Jaffe, Brad and his clients were concerned, that order was complied with.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 We did not learn otherwise until on the eve of the trial of the circuit court case that has been pending since before 2010, just a matter of a few weeks ago. A supplemental exhibit list was filed by the law firm of Link & Rockenbach listing documents on the privilege log that was constructed by the Jaffe law firm in accordance with this Court's order, listing documents and identifying them by the same stamp

1 2 numbers that had been placed on those documents by

3 4 THE COURT: And submitted to the Special

5 MR. SCAROLA: And sub ---

6 THE COURT: -- and to Jaffe.

7 8 9 MR. SCAROLA: That's correct, sir. went to Jaffe, one copy went to the trial The --- One copy

10 11 THE COURT: And appar, nt one copy was retained.

12 13 14 15 MR. SCAROLA: ctronic records were supposed to have been destroyed: All that was to remain were the hard copies, with the electronic disks having been returned to Farmer Jaffe.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So re should have been no retention of anything by Il'l t III. Mr. Link, in representations to the state tr I court, after issues were raised with regard to how he came to be in possession of documents that he clearly was not supposed to have, represented to the trial court that he had obtained the disk containing the information that was listed as potential trial exhibits from the law firm inside one of 36 boxes that he has told the Court he recently obtained possession of from . We have no direct

1 knowledge with regard to those matters, but that's what 2 the representation is that has been made.

3 One thing that is absolutely clear, no one, 4 other than Judge Carney and Jaffe is supposed to 5 have any copy of that privileged material. It was 6 specifically prohibited from being retained by the 7 law firm. It contains both attorney work product 8 and attorney/client privileged information, and we are 9 here today to ask your Honor to do five things.

10 We would like a rule to show cause issued so 11 that a determination can be made as to the full 12 circumstances under which this Court's clear and 13 unambiguous order has most obviously been violated.

14 We would like a direction from this Court 15 that , Jeffrey Epstein, and Link & Rockenbach 16 will submit to deposition so that sworn testimony with 17 regard to the clear violation of the Court's order can be 18 taken.

19 We would like a final hearing scheduled on 20 the order to show cause.

21 We would like this Court, in the interim, to 22 prohibit any further dissemination of any information 23 derived from that improperly possessed privileged 24 information, and we would like Link & Rockenbach directed 25 to withdraw all filings that have been made in any court

1 referencing the contents of these documents.

2 3 So those are the five things that we would hope to accomplish.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I recognize the fact that at least on the Court's calendar, we were informed this was to be a 10-minute hearing. We thank your Honor for allowing us any time on short notice, and we need some guidance from your Honor as to the extent to which you want us to get into any further detail beyond that which I have presented to the Court, and we're fully prepared to do that, but those are the five things we hope to see accomplished, and we hope to see accomplished expeditiously, issuance of the order to show cause, a direction with regard to pre-hearing discovery, the scheduling of a final hearing, a prohibition against further dissemination in violation of this Court's order, and the withdrawal of all references in previously filed documents to this unlawfully possessed information.

19 < \ THE COURT: All right.

20 21 22 23 ....\ OMR. SCAROLA: And I'm happy to answer any other questions your Honor may have. I hope I have, although I've probably taken more time than you've wanted me to, responded to the inquiry the Court had.

24 25 THE COURT: No, so Jaffe and want to take the deposition of

1 , Epstein and Link?

2 MR. SCAROLA: That's correct, your Honor.

3 MR. LINK: Yes, your Honor.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MR. SCAROLA: And with regard -- with regard to , it would be the corporate representative with the most knowledge with regard to these litters, the same with regard to Link & Rockenbach, and as far as Jeffrey Epstein is concerned, obviously he was personally prohibited by the express language of the Court's order from possessing or accessing any of this information, and we would certainly want to take Mr. Epliiiiii deposition.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 While representations have been made with regard to the extent that Mr. Epstein has been in possession of, or had access to this privileged information, the record is completely devoid of any sworn representation by Mr. Epstein, and clearly that is essential in terms of this Court fashioning, or first of all determining who is responsible for these very serious violations, and in fashioning an appropriate response.

20 Thank you, sir.

21 THE COURT: All right. Response?

22 MR. LINK: Thank you.

23 24 MR. CASSELL: This is Mr. Cassell, and the intervenors join in all those motions as well.

25 THE COURT: Thank you.

MR. LINK: Judge, if I can just respond briefly on behalf of Mr. Epstein.

First, notwithstanding what Mr. Scarola said, there is no factual issue. There has never been an allegation that Mr. Epstein has ever had the disks. He's never said it, has never said it. kel never had the disk.

THE COURT: Well, they're going ask him that question.

( L ' MR. LINK: I can make 'ghat representation to the Court. I can provide a sworn affidavit that he's never had it. He's never ha Nlylisk, plain and simple.

So, if that'\hat the Court is interested c t iara' in, I can represent tO this Court, and I believe will u to to that, and I don't believe Mr. Scarola has formation or evidence that would suggest Mr. Epstein one. ever held this disk. So that's point

Mr. Scarola. MR. LINK: I did not interrupt you,

Two ---

MR. SCAROLA: May I respond?

MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. It's not our contention Mr. Epstein has the disk, your Honor.

It is our contention that Mr. Epstein has

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 had access to the privileged information contained with-on the disk -- on the disk, and that simply is a distinction without a difference. Whether he received printed copies, whether he received information without getting printed copies really makes no difference. The point of your Honor's order was to prohibit access to privileged information.

8 9 And I'm sorry to have interrupted, but I think it's important to clarify that point.

10 THE COURT: Proceed, ink.

11 ^ MR. LINK: Thank you g •

12 13 So we now all e and that Mr. Epstein never had the disk.

14 15 16 The onl i fo tion Mr. Epstein ever ct received was from my la firm when I provided him select e-mails when we reviewed the disk, my law firm, in 2018.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So Mr. Epstein has not had one piece of paper that they're claiming he shouldn't have, and I want to make sure the Court understands what this disk is. This is not a disk of privileged information. It's a disk of 27,000 pages of which they claim some of them are privileged. They submitted a privilege log, Mr. Scarola said it was for this Court. It wasn't. The privilege log is in Judge Hafele's court, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County.

Judge Hafele had ---

THE COURT: Filled with these 27,000 pages?

MR. LINK: Pardon me?

THE COURT: And that privilege list deals with these 27,000 pages?

MR. LINK: It does, sir, and Judge Hafele has before him, as he should, since the privilege list, and the privileged documents, if they are privileged, are going to be presented to him hopefully in camera, that's the motion we have filed. I've asked for it in camera. Mr. Scarola has asked for it in camera in front of the state court judge.

Why? Because the only thing that your Honor was involved with related to the cancellation of a hearing, and an agreed order, and I'm going to let talk about Fowler issues from 2010, but I want to be very clear, so there is no mistake, I never had the disk, my law firm, Link & Rockenbach, until 2018.

When we received the disk, which was part of a box delivered by , we looked at it. It was sequentially numbered from 1 through 27,000. We looked at about 5,000 of those e-mails, Judge, before we were notified that there was a problem with our having the disk, and then we stopped looking.

Of the 5,000 we looked at, your Honor, the

1 2 3 4 vast majority of them had to do with things like, what are you going to do Friday night? Are you going to this concert at the Broward Civic Center? Are you going down to the Marlins game? Where should we go for lunch today?

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 There were 47 documents, 47 that I listed on a supplemental exhibit list and put those in fr9dIof Judge Hafele. Those documents are now sealed-ate disk is sealed pursuant to Judge Hafele's order. I have had my \*6-1 client and his general counsel remove alCro,ference to the 1 f documents that I've e-mailed to the have wiped my computers clean of all of the d\*Nib s. This issue is \ sitting before Judge Hafele

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mr. Scarola ariti asked the appellate court, we ha" It0 appeals pending in the 4th DCA, one a writ of mandamus, and one a petition for cert. They asked the appellate court to strike every reference to -- generally that we've made to these documents. Without even requiring us to respond, the appellate court denied their motion. They've asked the app604ate court to do what they're asking you to do.

21 22 23 24 And with all due respect, I'm not sure how this Court can tell the 4th DCA what to do with its pleadings, but -- I honestly don't know how that would work.

25 So, Judge what I want to make sure is clear

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 as it relates to Mr. Epstein is this, that this Court understands, he's never had the disk, never. He has never I had any of the documents, the 47 that they claim are privileged, that no one has looked at, no in camera yet, we're working on that, I sent him those materials, not He did not get them in 2010. He received them in 2018, and he no longer has them.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 So, every single thing they're asking for has happened by agreement. We did an agreed order to seal the disk. We did an agreed order to take the disk that we had from and it's in a sealed envelope. We've taken that disk and put it with the Clerk of the Court in state court. We have taken all of the exhibits, sealed them, numbered them, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, and placed them in the Clerk's file. There has been no further dissemination.

17 18 19 20 Until Judge Hafele removes the seal, if he does, those documents are going nowhere. The e-mails are going nowhere. The exhibits are going nowhere. Nobody has them.

21 22 23 24 25 So, what is the one issue that I think is outstanding for this Court? I think there is only one issue, and I don't know, your Honor, that any discovery from my firm can tell you, or from Mr. Epstein can tell where the disk came from that ended up in

1 2 3 4 5 6 box. Only can answer that question, if it can be answered. I don't know that they can tell you. It was 2010. Maybe somebody will be able to figure that out and they can address that, but the only issue, the only fact that we all don't know is, why is that disk in a box at

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Was it inadvertently kept? Was it given to them by the Special ? I have no idea. I wasn't around here in 2010 doing this work, but I know this, without any hesitation, the 47 e-mails that are sealed and waiting for Judge Hafele to look at are not being disseminated anywhere. The disk that they're concerned about is sealed. There are no copies. It's not going anywhere. The appellate court has told them, no, we're not striking references to it, and they've asked Judge Hafele to do the same thing. He hasn't ruled on it.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 So, to ask this Court to instruct Judge Hafele what to do in his , and the 4th DCA what to do in their , I don't think makes sense, but I do think your Honor has the jurisdiction to look at your order and determine if the simple retention by somehow is a violation of that order, and what's the consequence, if any.

24 25 But to ask my law firm where it got the disk, when they know where we get the disk, I've

1 2 3 4 5 represented to Mr. Scarola. Mr. Scarola told Judge Hafele he accepted my representation. Maybe he's changed his mind, and he thinks I've teleported back to 2010, but we did not have the disk, your Honor. We've submitted an affidavit, we did not receive the disk until 2018.

6 7 8 So what information could provide, or my client could admitted didn't have the disk, is through discovery I provide, who, they've beyond dge.

9 THE COURT: Thank you.

10 MR. LINK: Thank you.CS

11 MR. McLACHLAN: Thank you, Judge.

12 Niall McLachlan for White.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A couple of just points of clarification from Mr. Scarola's presentation, and I think it's -- one of them is probably very obvious to the Court. Mr. Scarola suggested that upon the bankruptcy the Special took possession of all of the records of Rothstein. Of course what he meant by that was the bankruptcy trustee.

20 21 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, I'm sorry, the Special had them as an agent of the bankruptcy trustee.

22 23 24 THE COURT: Well, the chain of pleadings in the Rothstein main case starts with Docket Entry 617, 672, 807, 888, 1068, 1120 and 1194, which is the order .

25 MR. McLACHLAN: That's correct, Judge, and

1 so here is the way it came about, there was litigation 2 pending in the state circuit court in Palm Beach County. 3 Mr. Epstein filed a subpoena from the state court to get 4 copies of the Rothstein records.

5 THE COURT: From Judge Stettin?

6 MR. McLAUCHLAN: No, they filed it -- yes, 7 from Judge Stettin as the trustee, that's correct.

8 THE COURT: The trustee.

9 MR. McLACHLAN: Yes, that's correct.

10 There was a dispute about how that would be 11 done. That's when those orders started to be entered. I 12 think the first one is probably the subpoena, and then the 13 orders, which ended up with the order that we're talking 14 about today.

15 Another point of clarification, Mr. Scarola 16 says that the order was entered over Jaffe's 17 objection. He may have had some -- the law firm may have 18 had some concerns, but it's very clear it's an agreed 19 order. I don't know that that makes a lot of difference 20 to the analysis, but I just want to be very clear, that 21 was an agreed order, that's at 1194.

22 So, that's why the state court is so 23 involved here, because it was a subpoena from that court. 24 That court was ruling on the objections. The only 25 involvement of this Court was you set the protocol by

1 2 3 4 5 6 which the documents would be produced by the trustee, and then you entered the order, 1194, that's at issue here today, and that order said shall not retain copies. We didn't, we sent them all to Jaffe in seven banker's boxes on November 10, 2010, and that e-mail is attached to our response.

7 8 9 We sent a CD to Jaffe. We also sent a CD with the numbers to Special Master Carney, who was to review the documents and go over the privilege log.

10 11 12 13 14 When your Honor indicated -- Mr. Scarola indicated that one copy went to Farmer Jaffe, one copy went to Special Carney, and your Honor stated, and one copy was retained. We don't know that. We don't know how the CD was in our files.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 What's very possible, because our records indicate we didn't keep it. Our records indicate -- well, i told you, that they went to Jaffe and to Special Carney. We have no idea. What's quite possible, and the only way we could ever determine this would be to get access to the CD and have it evaluated by an IT specialist, which I don't think will be necessary for the reasons I'll discuss in a minute. We think it's quite possible either that Special Carney, when he finished his work on the case a couple of years later, said, II, there is a CD, here is a CD that was sent to me

1 2 3 by , I'm going to return it to and someone at the firm opened it and said, II, this is Epstein, and just threw it in the box.

4 5 6 7 The other possibility is that Jaffe, when they printed five boxes of allegedly non-privileged documents and sent them back to us, one of their paralegals may have dropped the box (sic) in the file.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 What's very, very clear is that from whenever it was received, in 2010, '11, maybe '12, through March of 2018, no one made any reference to the CD, the privileged materials, no one tried to use the CD. It sort of defies belief that White would have some sort of conspiracy to get a CD, according to the motion at least, to have retained a CD, have just thrown it in the box and then done nothing with it, of course, for eight years, and then all of a sudden when we turn over 36 bankers boxes to the new lawyer, when the client asks for his files, which he was entitled to, they asked, just send all the boxes, and that's what we did.

20 21 22 23 24 25 Now, if the disk somehow got back into our file, which apparently it did, we don't know how, assuming it is the disk, but I have no reason to controvert that at this point, it's clear now that we don't have the disk. If it was in our files, we turned over 36 boxes, which included the disk, according to the affidavits filed.

1                                                     Okay. So, the facts as they exist now don't
2                                                     justify sanctions, and they don't justify discovery for
3                                                     the following reasons: I've already indicated what our
4                                                     investigation shows happened with the disks, and the
5                                                     e-mails are attached to our response.

6                                                     It's not entirely clear, and of course for a
7                                                     sanctions motion the order needs to be completely
8                                                     unambiguous, it's not entirely clear to me when I read
9                                                     that order that it's -- it certainly doesn't direct us
10                                                     what to do with the CD. It says you don't retain copies,
11                                                     all the copies were sent to Farmer Jaffe. We don't retain
12                                                     images on our copy machine, clearly didn't do that.

13                                                     If we later obtained a CD back, whether
14                                                     that's -- whether that's in violation of the order, I'm
15                                                     not sure. I don't think the order is that particularly
16                                                     clear, but that's not really the main point as to our
17                                                     response.

18                                                     The movants are asking for a finding of
19                                                     civil contempt, criminal contempt, and extensive
20                                                     discovery.

21                                                     Civil concept -- as your Honor probably
22                                                     knows, there are two sources of contempt powers, one is
23                                                     the Court's inherent power to enforce its orders. The
24                                                     other is, where applicable, Section 105(a) of the Code,
25                                                     where necessary to -- necessary and appropriate to enforce

1 provisions of Title 11.

2 3 4 Courts have held, and we've cited them in our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts don't have the inherent power to find criminal contempt.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Now based on the facts that I just laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis for it, but this also gets to the discovery point, and even though the 11th Circuit in In Re: McClean, they affirm a finding of punitive damages, which are by definition criminal, because it's punishment, as opposed to purely compensatory damages, they did so specifically under Section 105(a), and that Court actually said the powers -- the court's power to find contempt comes under 105(a).

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I think that was possibly a little over-broad, because other courts have found inherent power to enforce courts' orders, but what's very clear here is that 105(a) can have no application in this case. The movants are not seeking to enforce any provision or rights under Title 11. All of the cases that I found where they're talking about putative sanctions, they're all for violations of the automatic stay, willful violations, for violations of discharge orders, as in In Re: McClean. So, there is that issue.

24 25 Now, civil contempt, there are two purposes. One, purely compensatory, a flat amount is by definition

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 punitive, and that's criminal contempt. Civil contempt, it only deals with future conduct, not anything that's happened in the past, and what it says is, there are two purposes, to coerce compliance with the order that was allegedly violated. Well, you've heard we sent 36 boxes to Epstein, Epstein's counsel. We don't have the boxes. We don't have a disk.

8 9 10 11 12 The other is to award fees that were 441/4'14... incurred to obtain compliance. There is,cobpliance. Even Ibmw if there was a violation at some point, hen we received the disk back, there is no questio Nnre is compliance at this point.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . 1057 eSSfr There is alpb - ou can get fees for 8. damages as a result, but they haven't proven any damages. There is no damages alleged here. Their motion is interestingly de oil of any allegation of compensatory damages. What they say is they need discovery to determin )pmount of their damages, which is kind of a remarkable roposition. If they've been damaged, they kn Its) They don't need us to prove their damages. I've e r heard of that sort of thing in a discovery procedure.

23 24 25 The other reason for contempt is they say we want to discover the extent of the complicity, and the appropriate punishment for a violation of this Court's

1 2 3 4 5 order. That is by definition in the In Re: McClean case, and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court cases, that's seeking criminal contempt sanctions, which I've already discussed I don't believe are before the Court.

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 So, I don't believe, does not believe that discovery is appropriate here. If your Honor finds there is some limited discovery, we've cited the pertinent 11th Circuit cases, and I noticed Mr. Scarola didn't ask for access to White's computer records, but I want to be very clear, there is no basis for that under 11th Circuit precedent, we've cited in our case, so I don't want, if your Honor says the motion is granted, I don't want Mr. Scarola to say, II, well, then we get access to White's computer records.

16 17 18 19 20 In order to justify that, you would have to -- they would have to show that they've served discovery on White, and that they believe is destroying the evidence, or hasn't produced evidence. We're certainly nowhere near that point yet.

21 22 23 24 25 Which gets us to another issue on the requested discovery, if your Honor is inclined to grant any, and that is discovery should be in the normal course, send out a request for production, there is an opportunity to respond, object where necessary, and have the Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 rule on objections. There shouldn't just be a carte blanche order saying they get to depose people -- everyone in the possible chain of custody at , everyone in the possible chain of custody of Mr. Link's firm, and if your Honor finds there needs to be discovery, either for civil contempt, or if your Honor determines that you can rule on criminal contempt matters, or consider criminal contempt matters, the party that really needs discovery is , and here is why: First, if Jaffe is claiming they've s fe d damages, we ^ certainly need discovery about econd, we need to look at the CD, the offending CD e need to have it analyzed by an independent IT specialist, because we want to see if we can determine from that the chain of custody of that CD.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 If the CD shows that the documents were at any time opened by someone at Jaffe's firm, that means we got the CD back from them at some point after the production. If the CD shows that the documents were opened at any point by Special Carney, that would show that we got the CD back from Special Carney sometime after the production.

23 24 25 So, I think it's there are a lot of issues here, Judge. I think at this point, given that is undoubtedly in compliance, if we were ever

1 2 3 4 5 6 out of compliance, we are now in compliance with the order, so we do not believe that there is any basis for sanctions or for discovery, and that the motion just be denied, circuit court and the judge can issues there. we respectfully request and we can go back to the deal with the privilege

7 Thank you, Judge.

8 THE COURT: Mr. Pugatch.

9 10 11 12 13 14 ( \_441 S Y MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, C f I may on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we kind of went in ev se order, because Mr. Link got up to address the fac issues that were raised by Mr. Scarola, but I wante IV to point out our legal position on behalf of Mr. Epstein, which is actually very simple.

15 16 17 18 19 This hearing is to establish whether there is a basis to issue an order to show cause. All the other things that flow from what Mr. Scarola asked would only come after the Court determines that there is a basis to issue an order to show cause.

20 21 22 23 As to Mr. Epstein, and I'm speaking only on behalf of Mr. Epstein, you've heard nothing today that would indicate that they've met their burden of a prima facie case.

24 25 THE COURT: Well, but they want to take his deposition and ask him under oath, did you see the disk?

1 2 Did you ever see the disk? His answer is going to be very simple, no.

3 4 5 6 MR. PUGATCH: I understand that, Judge, but you've already seen that in the form of the representations of counsel, and an affidavit has been offered.

7 8 9 10 The issue of an order to show egoe AS01y "litt comes after they've met their prima facie case, and they're not standing here telling you -- in fact, they've admitted they agree that Mr. Epstein never had the disk.

11 12 13 14 15 16 So, if Mr. Epstein's possession of any of these materials only came th h Mr. Link and his firm in 2018, that's a separate andN tstinct issue from the issue that they've raised in terms of compliance with the Court order. They've ra eO nothing to establish a prima facie ) t: case that Mr. Ep telt : violated that order.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The other issues that they're raising are all bein dead with in the state court. They don't need /4k si to be, deal with in this Court. The issue of the A i seqpgstration of the materials, the materials under seal, Al'r the not further using, everything that you heard Mr. Link describe, that's being dealt with in the state court. That's what the consequence is of what's happened now, once there has been discovery, that in some manner this material got released, but they haven't met the burden of

1 2 3 4 showing there is a basis to issue an order to show cause against Mr. Epstein, and that is a requirement before we go to step two, to phase two of this whole proceeding, and we speak only on behalf of Mr. Epstein.

5 Excuse me, Judge.

6 MR. LINK: Can I have one moment to confer?

7 THE COURT: Yes.

8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. PUGATCH: The last point, Judge, would be if your determination today is that it's going to go forward in any form, or that there is going to be discovery, the discovery should be limited to strictly that one issue, and no other A sub, which is, did you have S.o" a copy of the disk or not

14 THE COURT: 4C.L. haveknowledge of it.

15 MR. PUGATCH: Or have knowledge of it.

16 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.

17 MR. PUGATCH: Thank you.

18 19 MR. : Your Honor, Brad on behalf of Farmer Jaffe.

20 21 22 23 24 25 I want to just briefly dispel some of the in-clarity that's in the record right now. First is that a privilege log was not filed in this case. The privilege log was filed in this case, as well as the state court case. There has been a representation made that Mr. Epstein did not possess the disk, and I think that

1 we're playing semantics here.

2 3 4 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to allow the deposition of Epstein, as to knowledge about the disk, or possession about the disk, very limited.

5 6 7 8 9 MR. Only about the subject of the disk, including dissemination to others, what he read from the disk, things of that nature, pertaining to the information on the disk, that's the only slect matter that we want to inquire about.

10 11 12 MR. LINK: I think counsel is talking about the information I provided my client, which we know about, and has nothing to do with this Court's order.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So, I thought your Honor was focused on whether Mr. Epstein, during the time period that had the disk, before it was given to me, knew the disk existed, touched the disk, saw the disk, because I have represented to the state court and to this Court in my papers that once I received the disk, and we looked at it, we identified 47 exhibits, which we filed in the state court, and I showed those to my client. I don't know what the factual issue is, Judge. I thought the Court was focused on the original disk that had in its possession, and whether Mr. Epstein was aware they had it, or if he ever had a copy of it, not what he's done in my case.

THE COURT: Response.

MR. exactly what : What has happened here is Jaffe knew was going to happen in 2010, and voiced repeatedly to the Special , when it was determined that , on behalf of Jeffry Epstein, was going to be able to in-house copy this material and not keep any copies.

The only thing that gave Farmer Jaffe any confidence whatsoever that Jeffrey Epstein would not retain, disseminate, review and later e to his litigation advantage the privileged- erials on this disk was this order right here. The order of November 30th, 2010 was not only intended to preclude retention, that's where the problem begins. What we were really trying to preclude was reviewing and using the materials.

So, in 2010, when

THE COURT: Your law firm prepared the order, and the order doesn't say that.

MR. : Well, the order, the order does say ---

THE COURT: It says should not retain any imagines or copies of said documents.

UNIDENTIFIED: Or otherwise, on it's computer or otherwise.

MR. : Right, will not

1 2 3 retain any copies of the documents contained on the disk provided to it, nor any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers.

4 5 6 7 8 9 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to allow the deposition of the representative of , to explain under oath, to answer the question, did they retain any copies in the computers. Obviously they're going to tell me the answer is no, and do they have any independent knowledge of how the disk got in the box.

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 MR. : What we do know, though, that has happened, and what we're trying to determine is the scope and the breadth of what has happened, is that , through transferring their boxes, has transferred this disk, along with all of the privileged information to Mr. Link, who has disseminated it to others, and he has represented on the record in the state court that he's disseminated ---

18 19 20 21 THE COURT: It may show the facts, may show that Fowler did not knowingly transmit the disk. They didn't -- they may -- their testimony may be that they had no knowledge.

22 23 24 25 MR. : It may be, and may be, and maybe there is one sanction for an inadvertent transmission, and another for an intentional transmission. Regardless, once Mr. Link came into the possession of

1 2 3 this, as an agent for Mr. Epstein recently, he still put into the record summaries of this material that was improperly obtained.

4 5 THE COURT: That's been all disclosed to the state court judge.

6 7 8 9 MR. : That has all been disclosed, which is the problem. I mean, this is the use of these materials that never should anyone. have come into cession of

10 11 THE COURT: From wha sealed by the state court. derstand it's been

12 MR. LINK: It has, \_ ur Honor.

13 MR. : It's been sealed.

14 MR. LINK: So

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MR. EDWARDS: It's been sealed, yes. The representation was made on the record by Mr. Link that he provided it within his law firm and his client, that being Mr. Epstein. When further asked by the court, has Mr. Epstein been provided with copies of the documents, or the contents of these privileged documents? Mr. Link replied, I just said my client, my law firm and my client, and I can say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So, that's it.

24 25 So we now know that this information that was improperly obtained was disseminated not only to

1 2 Mr. Epstein, the adversary who now has this information, it was also ---

3 THE COURT: Take that up in the state court.

4 5 6 7 8 MR. : That's in the state court, but your Honor reserved jurisdiction to accord the right sanctions for the violation, the violation being the retention and all the consequential damages that stemmed from that initial improper retention.

9 THE COURT: Ten years andeing.

10 11 12 13 MR. : We don . I mean, we just don't know what Whi ith it for seven years, whether Jeffrey EpstekCI%1/14 , actually had it for seven years.

14 THE CO Wbil, you can ask Epstein that.

15 MR. EDW S: Okay. I agree.

16 17 MR. LINK: I've got (inaudible) -- if that's what the Judge, if you're ordering, that's what ---

18 19 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to take the order to show cause under advisement.

20 MR. LINK: Right.

21 22 23 24 THE COURT: I'm going to authorize the deposition of the representative of , and of Epstein, individually, limited as I've indicated on the record.

25 MR. LINK: Very good, thank you.

order.

THE COURT: Mr. Pugatch, you draft that

MR. PUGATCH: Will do, Judge.

THE COURT: Run it by counsel.

MR. SCAROLA: Thank you for your time today.

THE COURT: Hold it. I'm not done.

MR. SCAROLA: II, I'm sorry.

MR. LINK: Thank you, your Honor.

THE COURT: We're going tN rtinue i to take Ac ii the order under advisement -- the o de to show cause to a later date. I'll set it for a hea • ) I'll make a determination as to whether s pot, once discovery is done, let me -- there wer itNthy er notes.

II, what is ihtle alleged damages and claims of the parties, what sanctions are they seeking?

MR. EDWARDS: Should I speak -- Brad on behalf of Jaffe.

THE COURT: Well, no, just do a statement and

.±-\\

MR. : Okay.

THE COURT: -- so it's of record. The same with the other party, Mr. Cassell.

MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor, we have that in Docket Entry 6345, we join in the request from Jaffe, and we have seven independent requests for the

1 2 3 4 victims, including damages. We would also like to be - during the deposition we would like to be able to ask Epstein questions, including questions about who he has distributed these documents to.

5 6 This involves a childhood sexual abuse case, and so if he's disseminating --

7 THE COURT: No, you're not going --

8 MR. CASSELL: information aba' that --- ,

9 10 11 12 THE COURT: -- depose Epstein on state court issues. You're going to be -- he's go . g to be limited in /ft' his testimony to if he had knowl iV,)I the disk prior to it being disseminated --

13 UNIDENTIFIt Mr. Link.

14 THE CO Nto Mr. Link.

15 16 17 ;4() MR. : Your Honor, may I ask that maybe P h" one attorney on behat of the movant, but not -- II, I'm sorry, I'll come over here.

18 19 Your Honor, may I ask two things? Is it okay if I -- I didn't mean to interrupt you.

20 THE COURT: Go ahead.

21 22 MR. LINK: One, might I ask that since we have limited

23 THE CLERK: Stand by a mic.

24 25 MR. LINK: -- questions you're going to allow Mr. Epstein to be asked, that one lawyer on behalf

1 2 3 4 of the movant ask them, and second, if you're going to allow to do what it wants, which is to have somebody look at the disk, it has been sealed by the state court.

5 THE COURT: No, I didn't say that.

6 7 that --- MR. LINK: Okay. I just wanted to make sure Atc\_

8 9 10 THE COURT: I said I'm going( '44S they can ask their designated representative can be asked if he had any knowledge of the disk.

11 MR. LINK: Very g ank you, Judge.

12 13 MR. I SCAROLA: lisc r nor may I request a clarification of the Cour t.er?

14 15 16 i want to be Su re that we are clear with regard to the scope of the inquiry that we're permitted to conduct, particularly with regard to Mr. Epstein.

17 THE COURT: Yes.

18 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir.

19 20 21 Your Honor has made repeated reference to being permitted to inquire of Mr. Epstein about his possession of the disk.

22 23 24 Your Honor's order related not only to the electronic documents, but related as well to any copies of the documents that were made.

25 Mr. Link has made it clear in his

1 2 3 representations to your Honor today, and he has stated previously that he sent copies of the privileged documents to Mr. Epstein.

4 5 6 Mr. Epstein, we know, retained those documents, and retention of those documents is a clear violation of your Honor's order.

7 8 9 10 11 What we would like to be able to inquire about, in addition to whether Mr. Epstein had possession of the disk, is whether Mr. Epstein had possession of copies of any of the information ob ai d from that disk, including the e-mail ---

12 13 THE COURT: ButAh isk wasn't discovered until Link found it in the 36 boxes.

14 MR. LINK: Correct, your Honor.

15 16 17 18 MR. SCAROLA: Well, yes, sir, that's what has been represented to the Court, but what Mr. Link has said is that he transferred that information to Mr. Epstein.

19 < THE COURT: After he found it.

20 21 'Ar""\ MR. SCAROLA: Well, he obviously couldn't transfer it before.

22 23 THE COURT: But that's what you're litigating in state court.

24 25 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir, I'm sorry, that's not what we're litigating in state court.

1 2 3 4 5 What we are litigating in state court is the malicious prosecution claim. What we want to be able to litigate before your Honor is violation of this Court's order, and retention of documents obtained from that disk is a clear violation of your Honor's order.

6 THE COURT: I disagree with you.

7 8 MR. SCAROLA: May I refer the specific language in that regard?

9 10 11 12 13 Your Honor stated, and I quote, should it be determined that or Eps,4eess retained images or copies of the subject documents computer, or otherwise, the Court retains iction to award sanctions.

14 So, if Epstein has retained copies

15 THE COIIR1 Eight years later --

16 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

17 THE COURT: -- from his lawyer

18 MR. SCAROLA: That is correct, sir.

19 THE COURT: -- who discovered ---

20 21 MR. SCAROLA: That is correct, no matter when it occurs, it's a violation of this Court's order.

22 23 THE COURT: Take that up in your state court litigation.

24 25 MR. SCAROLA: So, just so that I'm sure, your Honor is prohibiting ---

THE COURT: I'm going to do the order authorizing the depositions.

MR. SCAROLA: All right. Thank you, sir.

MR. : Judge, thank you.

THE COURT: All right. Now, I want -- Mr. Cassell and Mr. , so that it's understood, I want an individual statement filed setting forth your alleged damages and what you're seeking.

MR. On behalf of all three?

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. : Yes II Honor.

MR. PUGATCH: dge, will your order

MR. CASSE 'Atki( AS;., e , your Honor.

MR. that you asked -- PU -- be the entire order then,

THCCO T: Well ---

MR. PUGATCH: -- me to prepare, or do you still want me to do an order that continues the order to show cause hearing, or are you going to wrap it all up in one order?

AL.

THE CLERK: All one order.

MR. PUGATCH: Okay.

THE COURT: We'll do a ---

THE CLERK: With a nice little bow.

THE COURT: We'll do it in one order.

1 All right. That concludes today's hearing.

2 MR. PUGATCH: Thank you.

3 MR. LINK: Your Honor ---

4 5 MR. SCAROLA: Can we have a timeframe with regard to Mr. Epstein's appearance, your Honor?

6 THE COURT: It will be in the order.

7 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, sir.

8 MR. LINK: Thank you very mulf) udge.

9 Your Honor, may I ask one more thing --

10 11 THE COURT: Wait, wai, it, wait, wait, wait.

12 MR. LINK: beip we depart?

13 THE CLERK: 1458v

14 15 16 U THE CO lie't5, te motion for joinder, that's going to be granted, 6 5 is granted, Cassell will see to that order, as he will on 6344.

17 18 OPERATOR: Pardon the interruption, your Honor ---

19 20 MR. LINK: Your Honor, may I ask one question?

21 22 THE COURT: Hang on for a minute. Let me make sure I've got everything.

23 24 25 OPERATOR: I'm sorry, pardon the interruption, your Honor. It looks like Mr. Cassell has disconnected. I'll go ahead and redial back out to him,

1 okay? Would you like me to re-connect him?

2 THE CLERK: We'll call ---

3 THE COURT: We'll call him.

4 5 THE CLERK: CourtCall, that won't be necessary. I'll call the attorney myself.

6 Thank you.

7 OPERATOR: Thank you very much, Madam Clerk.

8 THE COURT: All right. That concludes ---

9 MR. LINK: May I, your Holt?

10 THE COURT: Yes.

11 12 13 14 MR. LINK: I was j ng to ask for - since Mr. Epstein's depositi ti i o narrow and limited by this Court's order, may he alllb "r by phone? He's in New York City, your Honor, or sometimes not in the country.

15 16 17 18 MR. SCAROLA: We would request an opportunity to depose Mr. Epstein in person, your Honor. Mr. Epstein is a self-acknowledged billionaire. He maintains a home in Palm Beach County, Florida.

19 20 THE COURT: The deposition will take place in the Southern District of Florida.

21 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, sir.

22 MR. : Thank you, your Honor.

23 MR. PUGATCH: Thank you, Judge.

24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, thank you for your time today.

THE COURT: Thank you.

MR. LINK: Thank you very much, your Honor.

UNIDENTIFIED: Thank you for your time.

THE COURT: Let's keep all this together.

THE CLERK: CourtCall, we will disconnect.

(Thereupon, the O Baring

A(t )

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE :

I, Cheryl L. Jenkins, RPR, rthand Reporter and Notary Public in and for thejoyate of Florida at Large, do hereby certify that th foregoing proceedings were transcribed by me from a digli g recording held on the date and from the place as stab'd in the caption i. hereto on Page 1 to the best ofvmy ability.

4 041

this 18th day of April, 2018. WITNESS% .

C

CHERYL L. JENKINS, RPR, RMR

Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large Commission #GG 138863 December 27, 2021

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 19, 2018.

Raymond B. Ray, Judge
United States Bankruptcy Court

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
www.flsb.uscourts.gov
Fort Lauderdale Division

In re:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA,

Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Debtor.

Chapter 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY ██████████ AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT
AND SCHEDULING EVIDENTIARY SHOW CAUSE HEARING

THIS MATTER came before the Court for a hearing on April 13, 2018, upon the Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why ██████████ and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] thereto. Interested Party ██████████ filed a notice of joinder [D.E. 6325], and sexual assault victims, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, filed a Motion to Intervene [D.E. 6344] and a Motion for Joinder [D.E. 6345], which were granted at the April 13th Hearing. [D.E. 6360, 6364]. After having considered the pleadings, court file, argument of the parties, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court finds as follows.

I. ALLEGATIONS

ME, Jaffe, Weissing,M, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L. a Jaffe") filed the Motion for Order to Show Cause [D.E. 6326] alleging that the attorneys at the law firm of Burnett, P.A. ') violated this Court's Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing on Motion for Relief from Amended Order (D.E. 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested PartyM. Jafe, Weaning Flsjo4& Lehrman, P.L. [D.E. 1194] (the "Agreed Order"). The Agreed Order [D.E. 1194] stated that:

will not retain any copies of the documents contained on to i nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in copiers. Should it be determined that or Eps copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Co to award sanctions in favor of I= Brad a, or hi vided mory of n retained images or ns jurisdiction

In summary, Jaffe has alleged that Order [D.E. 1 194] because allegedly retai and, fFryy, ein violated the Agreed f the "subject documents" and passed these documents on to Mr. Epstein ant a nt counsel, Scott Link and Kara r Rockenbach. [D.E. 6326 at 6-11]. The Co Jaffe in the Motion for Order to the requirements of a prima facie co tes by reference the allegations made by Id. The Court finds that the allegations satisfy n an order to show cause.

The Court wi hold r evidentiary Show Cause Hearing to consider civil contempt. Point Credit, LLC v. requisite d the alleg re McLean), 794 F.3d 1313, 1323 (11th Cir. 2015). The Court shall provide the rotections by issuing this "show-cause order providing notice and a hearing in which temnor, who may be represented by counsel, can introduce evidence rebutting the allegation of contempt and testify on its own behalf." Id. at 1324 (citing Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 767 (11th Cir. 1990)). The Court will refrain from considering criminal contempt, punitive sanctions, or incarceration because of the requisite due process protections, i.e. a possible jury trial. Id. at 1324 (citing Young v. United States et reL Vuitton Et Fils & A., 481 U.S. 787, 798-99, 107 S. Ct. 2124 (1987)).

. LEGAL STANDARD

To provide clarity for the parties, the Court will consider civil contempt and potential sanctions under the following legal standard. Although the Court possesses the inherent power to enforce its orders, the Court recognizes that the inherent powers should be used sparingly and will instead rely upon the statutory contempt power provided in II U.S.C. § 105(a). Point Credit, LLC v. McLean (In re McLean), 794 F.3d 1313, 1319 (11th Cir. 2015) (citing Jove Eng'g, Inc. v. IRS, 92 F.3d 1539, 1554 (11th Cir. 1996)); Gowdy v. Mitchell (In re Ocean Warrior, Inc.), 835 F.3d 1310, 1316-17 ( 1 Cir. 2016). Section 105(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides:

The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title pro ing an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the curt taking any action or making any determination necessary or app implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of p ate to raising of in, sua sponte, e to enforce or

The Court has jurisdiction here because the Court retained ju 1194], and this alleged discovery violation is a core proceedings include, but are not limited to (A) matt iprQe ing the administration of the estate"); In re Ocean Warrior, Inc., 835 F.3d at 1318 tin re Skinner, 917 F.2d 444 (10th Cir. 1990)) ("[c]ivil contempt proceedings arising f matters are themselves core matters."). the Agreed Order [D.E. See 28 U.S.C. § 157 ("Core

To prevail in a civil co mpt ceding, the movant must establish by "'clear and convincing' proof that the derlyin order was violated." Howard Co. v. Khimani, 892 F.2d 1512, 1516 (11 (citing v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513, 1525 (11th Cir. 1984); Piambin B Prods., Inc., 645 F. Supp. 1210, 1213 (S.D. Fla. 1986)). "However, once the i s y makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of produc n shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a 'present inability to comply that goes 'beyond a mere assertion of inability.'" Id. (quoting Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970, 984 (11th Cir. 1986)). The Court will not consider the "subjective beliefs or intent of the alleged contcmnors in complying with the order," but the Court will consider substantial compliance made in good faith. Id. (citing Jim Walter Res., Inc. v. Intl Union, etc., 609 F.2d 165, 168 (5th Cir. 1980);

740 F.2d at 1524).

if, after notice and an evidentiary hearing, the Court makes a finding of civil contempt, the Court will consider imposing "compensatory sanctions for actual damages" incurred. In re McLean, 794 F.3d at 1326. These compensatory sanctions must serve "either or both of two purposes: to coerce the defendant into compliance with the court's order, and to compensate the complainant for losses sustained." Id. at 1323 (quoting FTC v. Leshin, 719 F.3d 1227, 1231 (11th Cir. 3)). These compensatory sanctions may include, but are not limited to, professional fees the sensitive nature of the allegations, damages for emotional distress.' See id.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

  • 1. The Motion for Order to Show Cause [D.E. 6326 D.
  • 2. Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and a representative of F are DIRECTED to appear on Au eu s t 23 and 24. 2018 at 10:00 A.M. i 308, 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33301 and W USE as to why they should not be held in contempt of court. This Show Cause all be evidentiary in nature. Failure to appear shall result in either Whit orJe Win being held in contempt of Court and other such action as the Court deems n
  • 3. L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe arc DIRECTED to file a ir damages with the Court.
    • s. Movants may take the depositions of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, any rcpresentativc(s) of with knowledge of the chain of custody of the discovery documents, and a representative Link & Rockenbach, P.A.. All depositions shall be conducted in person and in

&#x27; 'To recover damages for emotional distress, 'a plaintiff must (1) suffer significant emotional distress, (2) clearly establish the significant emotional distress, and (3) demonstrate a causal connection between the significant emotional distress and the violation of the [order]."' In re McLean, 794 F.3d at 1325-26 (quoting Lodge v. Kondaur Capital Corp., 750 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2014)).

the Southern District of Florida. The subject matter of the depositions shall be limited to the allegations of federal civil contempt regarding the alleged discovery violations of the Agreed Order [D.E. I I 94]. If the parties find that additional depositions arc necessary, the party seeking to take the deposition shall file a motion with the Court in a timely manner so as not to delay the Show Cause Hearing.

  • 5. Exhibits. The parties are to exchange their respective exhibit binders, whi h ey wish to present to the Court at the Show Cause Hearing, no later than the Show Cause Hearing.
    • a. Pursuant to this order, the parties shall submit to the Co tubers, located in room 306, 299 East Broward Blvd., Fort Lauderdale no later than two (2) business cku before the Show Cause Hearing da nders containing:
    • i. A set of pre-marked exhibi be offered as evidence at the hearing including the sworn h set out hereinafter. Movant(s)'s exhibits shall be mark < ei ally, and Respondent(s)' exhibits shall be marked alphabeti ily ibits shall be bound in a notebook or folder with tabs mar 'bit, and shall be accompanied by an Exhibit Register in the cot onning to Local Form 49. Sufficient copies must be provided so t%qt a set is available for each party, the witnesses, and the judge, as required by Local Rule 9070. Not...) ii. Opening Statement. Any written opening statement the patty wishes the Court to read before the Show Cause Hearing begins. Oral opening statements normally will not be permitted at hearing.

2 It is wise to contact the Court's staff prior to delivering the documents to assure that someone will be present to accept the exhibit binders.

  • iii. Summaries. Any summaries intended to be submitted into evidence must be prepared and submitted as pursuant to Rule 1006 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
  • iv. Sworn Declarations. Unless otherwise ordered, the direct testimony of each witness, except adverse, hostile or rebuttal witnesses, shall be presented by sworn declarations consisting of a succinct written state t f the direct testimony which that witness would be prepared to • qu ons were propounded in the usual fashion at the Show Cause . ch statement of fact shall be separate, sequentially num contain only facts which are relevant and material to cested issue before the Court, avoiding redundancies, hearsay, ously objectionable statements. The statement shall be si alty of perjury by the declarant. A sample statement canJre igyp Local Form 63B. Such statements may be referenced as th om declaration of fact."
    • 1. sworn declarations shall be marked as exhibits and ted in the Exhibit Register. jections to any portions of the statements may be raised at the time the sworn declaration of each respective witness is offered to the Court. The witness shall then be sworn and asked if the statement correctly reflects the testimony that would be given if the witness was asked the appropriate questions. Assuming an affirmative answer, opposing counsel may then cross-examine the witness. At the conclusion of cross-examination, the party whose witness is on the stand may conduct oral redirect examination in the usual manner.

  • b. The parties shall confer on the admissibility of the exhibits prior to the Show Cause Hearing, and shall announce on the record the exhibits they agree are admitted into evidence, objected to, or withdrawn.
  • c. Written objections to the use of deposition transcripts or admissibility of exhibits other than the sworn declarations shall be filed not later than two (2) days prior to the Show Cause Hearing. The objection must (i) identify the exhibit, (ii) state th grounds for the objection, and (iii) provide citations to case law and other a ty in upport of the objection. If no written objections are timely filed they waived unless excused by the Court for good cause.
  • 6. Final Argument At the conclusion of the Show Ca g, in lieu of final argument, the Court may request that each party submit (a) a argument or (b) a proposed memorandum o k r •6 ,n ndings of fact and conclusions of law with a separate proposed final judgm l s ; Sit v, processing format, to the Court's electronic mailbox, RBR l
  • 7. Settlement. If the proc i led, Plaintiff's counsel shall upload to the Court an Agreed Stipulation o Ag nal Judgment approved by both parties prior to the time the statement with supporting legal Show Cause H g is i36egin, otherwise all counsel shall be prepared to go forward with the Show Ca Healing: In addition, Plaintiffs counsel is instructed to immediately inform the puty, Ms. Edy Gomez at Edy Gomez®Ilsb.uscourts.gov, of any settlement, so ez may use the day for other matters. If a judgment or stipulation is not submitted to the Court, all counsel shall be prepared to go forward with the Show Cause Hearing. If the proceeding is removed from the calendar based upon the announcement of a settlement, the proceeding will not be reset, if the parties fail to consummate the settlement. In that event, the Court will only consider a motion to enforce the settlement.

  1. 8. Sanctions. Failure to comply with any provision of this order or prior Court Orders may result in appropriate sanctions, including the award of attorney's fees, striking of pleadings, dismissal of the action, or striking of claims.

# # #

The Clerk shall provide copies to:

Jack Scarola, Esq.

[Attorney Scarola is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.]

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

EXHIBIT D

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

AS TRANSCRIPT O

?</14:4e r

DATE TAKEN: day, March 8th, 2018 TIME: p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

(..Se !rmillie

AwiN '...) , This cause came on to be heard at the time and ace aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by:

Cos

Elaine V. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

1 reserving on that as well.

2 3 4 MR. CASSELL: But related to that is the distribution. The cat is now wandering out of the bag, so time is of the essence.

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: Right. And again, I think that in an abundance of caution, and I understand y concerns, but what the attorneys here r iz and Mr. Epstein is also under this or is that no further dissemination is going o b made. I think that goes without sayin far as the attorneys are concerned. own each of them known Mr. Scarola ISg i Terry, Mr. Burlington, seated at counsel tabl o ny years, as I have \* Sr and I think the nize that when this Court makes a sta n that it is abundantly clear that it will e rced to the letter. I have no doubt in m mind hat they will all be respectful of the curt der of non-dissemination of any of those ents hence forth.

20 21 22 23 24 25 And Mr. Link has already represented to the Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his co-counsel, that there have been no eyes laid upon these documents. Hence, I'm accepting that representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well.

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8946d692b77cbf312ec7ce83aa93f9d98b9560e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/EFTA02766859.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,4168 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 96, + "chars": 144207, + "elapsed_seconds": 25.64, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_85_Picture_98.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND AQ EPSTEIN'S \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO BE \nPERMITTED TO TAKE HI I1141ND DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 476.59521484375, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 476.59521484375, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6 XNTRODUCTION )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.2100067138672, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 355.6263732910156, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 355.6263732910156, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 221.2100067138672, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 344.6411437988281, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 344.6411437988281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "St\\\nI. A Privilege Determination Has ( Made", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.5737609863281, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.5737609863281, + 418.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 418.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Claim of Violations of the Bankruptcy Court's Order is Properly Before \nthe Bankruptcy Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 154.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 154.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. This Court Has Already Ordered that Epstein Cannot Use the Documents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 489.2550354003906, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 489.2550354003906, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 555.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 555.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 127.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 127.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 356.39239501953125, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 356.39239501953125, + 431.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 431.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HISTORICAL BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 392.78338623046875, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 392.78338623046875, + 582.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 582.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECENT EVENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 360.2373352050781, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 360.2373352050781, + 307.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 307.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 381.9764404296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 381.9764404296875, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Specific Relief Sought", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.608, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 382.8849182128906, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 382.8849182128906, + 169.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 169.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Authority to Enter4/Huai Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 424.5943603515625, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 424.5943603515625, + 361.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 361.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 472.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 472.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0440368652344, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.572, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 445.9437561035156, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 445.9437561035156, + 103.213134765625 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 103.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 294.37199999999996, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 410.301025390625, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 410.301025390625, + 107.3499755859375 + ], + [ + 294.37199999999996, + 107.3499755859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 376.1794738769531, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 376.1794738769531, + 138.0931396484375 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 138.0931396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA www.flsb.uscourts.gov Fort Lauderdale Division", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.676, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 411.876, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 411.876, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 349.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT AND SCHEDULING EVIDENTIARY SHOW CAUSE HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 489.23999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 71.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 354.808349609375, + 71.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 354.808349609375, + 85.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 85.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ". LEGAL STANDARD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 366.98712158203125, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 366.98712158203125, + 489.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 489.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS TRANSCRIPT O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 402.5552062988281 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 402.5552062988281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766859" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/_page_85_Picture_98.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/_page_85_Picture_98.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..155e5bd8685398c99fee969278cf27ae04a1bb83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766859/_page_85_Picture_98.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c4609b22622f1215fbd76fce6f9546ba6f7fe05294cc0488d875c3a65d6c206 +size 10857 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f78620d5fd49f487c2ce8c73d8c2aa5bbb82baa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO Ns11)ZING ) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that th cheduled for May 3, 2018 at 8:45 a.m. on Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, Edwards' Permit J. to take the Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein is h an ed and will be rescheduled by the parties at a later date. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that correct copy of the foregoing has been famished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the~c ist, this 30th day of April, 2018. + +/s/ vital& TR. + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail: dvitale@searcylaw.com and kmarsh@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efiletpathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for J. + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Philip Burlington, Esquire pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +Jay Howell, Esquire jay@jayhowell.com Jay Howell & Associates P.A. 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 2 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Phone: (904)-680-1234 I ra Fax: (904)-680-123 Attorneys for B J. + +Paul G. C mire paul.casse tah.edu S.J. lege of Law 383 S Uni ity Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 Attorneys for J. + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®Iinlcrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linlcrocklaw.com; rachel@li Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 O ocCr aw.com; ) .com + +LSI 4- + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nurildaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Attorneys for Scoclist Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +A \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0df85c7675dd85756cbc2713160e1c479e2a79f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955/EFTA02766955.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766955.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2591, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.34400000000005, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.34400000000005, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO Ns11)ZING )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 314.1243896484375 + ], + [ + 433.868896484375, + 314.1243896484375 + ], + [ + 433.868896484375, + 336.4277038574219 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 336.4277038574219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766955" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ed12bf8b8a62d6cdef25465a6f3de5b56c68a51 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.md @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +following: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED ?S. l% , ersigned has called up for hearing the + +DATE: May 3, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable uald Hafele + +PLACE: ROOM #: Kc 20 . Dixi Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Defendant(s). + +63 4SA- + +c + +## NOTICE OF H I'S ) + +## SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +N/A Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 301h day of April, 2018. + +> Gs' meys for J. + +/s/ Davi.d.P. V + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: + +Primary E ateam©searcylaw.com; + +Attorney E searcvlaw.com and mm + +carola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Beach, Florida 33409 + +561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. MI, Esquire staff.efile®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for J. + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Philip Burlington, Esquire pmb®flappellatelaw.com;kbt®Flappellatelaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)421-0400 Attorneys for J. (<4 + +Jay Howell, Esquire jay®jayhowell.com Jay Howell & Associates P.A. 644 Cesery Boulevard, Site 25 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Phone: (904)-680-124 Fax: (904)-680-1 Attorneys + +Paul G. C uire paul.c w.utah.edu S.J. Quinn College of Law 383 S University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 Attorneys for J. + +CO4S-A + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®Iinlcrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linlcrocklaw.com; rachel@li Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 O ocCr aw.com; ) .com + +LSI 4- + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nurildaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Attorneys for Scoclist Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +A + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355 4380, Americans with Disabili es Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or im lately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appea less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvilida que necesita algon acomnattienit bare poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin ten gas s propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Paln`&ach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355 4380 Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacita del °to ode la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwe fcc trwm asyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn n po peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou an oubyen imedyatman apre ou ft tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou. ou gen randevou pou park nan tribinal la, a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w pant nan pwoblim pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..283e25e92a3b5ac6478434ec4c91896a0965d6b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958/EFTA02766958.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766958.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4780, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF H I'S )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 375.26934814453125, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 375.26934814453125, + 362.60302734375 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 362.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD: Motion for Status Conference", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 428.9336853027344, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 428.9336853027344, + 583.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 583.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766958" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43ae428331a140147df191d6b4dcfa057187b06e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +8 + +April 27, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. Although petitioner correctly asserted that the entire action was not "at issue" within the meaning of rule 1.440 when the prior notice for trial was filed, the trial date at issue has passed, and respondent has filed a new notice for trial; further, ORDERED that this Court's March 29, 2018 order staying the setting of a trial date is discharged. The trial court may set a trial date within the time set forth in rule 1.440(c) from the March 20, 2018 notice for trial. No motion for rehearing will be entertained; further, + +ORDERED that petitioner's March 19, 2018 request for oral argument is denied; further, + +ORDERED that petitioner's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees and costs is denied; further, + +ORDERED that respondent's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees is denied. + +CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. + +Served: + +cc: + +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Jack Alan Goldberger +Clerk Palm Beach + +John Scarola +Nichole J. Segal +Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Philip M. Burlington +Rachel Jenny Glasser + +dl + +*Lonn Weissblum* + +**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_0_Picture_142.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4802495df2ed590f04ab4be553d6d1a39f206aa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/EFTA02766963.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1600, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.85, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_142.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 102.06 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 218.48399999999998, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 218.48399999999998, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 63.035999999999994, + 264.06000000000006 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766963" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/_page_0_Picture_142.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/_page_0_Picture_142.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99ba511be2575512eef1371a5fa0c6845c3cf38d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766963/_page_0_Picture_142.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f7e6b8a1eba51668896c9e5649d45ff51dd40b2e8cba791ddb901d3a84e12c00 +size 18547 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3926d24ca9e0e0798562d0ee51d6d9aa90be72d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.md @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT MOTION TO ALLOW AMENDME EPSTEIN'S IBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epst 4 Court allow him to amend his Exhibit List, c staff , respectfully requests that the + +### OD CTION + +The resetting of this case 1ph Counter-Plaintiff severed Counterclaim will ew trial order and provides ample time to permit Epstein to amend his Exhibit List an e exhibits he produced to on February 2, February 16, and March 2, 20 whi .' all fell into general categories previously disclosed. had lmowkd bo the exhibits themselves and the content well before Epstein amended his Exit& r March 5, 2018 to identify each document individually and, therefore, cannot claim surprise or prejudice. For instance, the exhibits included documents produced in this + +A Cos + +&#x27;Epstein intends to substantially narrow the list of exhibits and will not be adding the "more than 700 exhibits" complained about. + +case, litigation was directly involved in, and public records, such as police reports and litigation involving three clients, among other documents. + +### RECORD FACTS + +I. Pursuant to this Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial (D.E. 938), the deadline for the exchange of exhibit lists was 60 days prior to trial. At tha) time, trial was set on December 5, 2017, making the deadline October 6, 2017. + +2. The July 20, 2017 Order also provided, in pertinent part: + +ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJE 0 At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits esses disclosed and objections reserved on the schcdul tta to the Pm-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance wi p graphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in a al Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discover o sel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall i el furnish the Court and other counsel with a deseriptio a ibit ..., together with the reason for the late discove a ibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may Ilo by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent m tice. + +(D.E. 938 at i G (emphasis add C .) + +3. Epstein's current counsel were retained after the October 6, 2017 deadline and, on November 6, 20 m 1 t of the uncertainty of what issues would be tried and the numerous outstanding ti issues, moved for a continuance of the trial and to extend the pre-trial deadlines the deadline for allowing the parties to filed amended Exhibit Lists. (D.E. 1035.) ds opposed this request. (D.E. 1055.) + +4. On November 14, 2017, the Court granted the continuance request and continued the special set trial to March 13, 2018. The Court's Order, however, did not address Epstein's request for an extension of the pre-trial deadlines. (D.E. 1057.) On November 16, 2017, Epstein amended his Exhibit List. (D.E. 1067.) + +5. On November 9, November 15 and December 7, 2017, after the deadline set by the Court's July 20, 2017, Trial Order and without leave of Court, filed amended Exhibit Lists as well. (D.E. 1043, 1062, 1109.) + +6. Counsel sought clarification from the Court on November 27, 2017, regarding the disclosure cutoff ruling. The Court granted Motion to Reconfirm the Exis ' g Pre-Trial Deadlines because of his concern over additional discovery. The Court noted, er, that it would permit additional limited discovery upon further motion. (D.E. 108 + +7. On November 29, December 5 and December 7, 201 es participated in extensive special set hearings wherein the Court made rulings r 'ng e issues and evidence to be presented at trial. + +8. The parties filed their Joint Pretrial Pretrial S on December 22, 2017, attaching their last filed Exhibit Lists (Epstein's Nove S "SS r i , 7, Exhibit List and MF December N;efPm al Stipulation, the parties agreed that they did not waive their right to amend the' 'b ists. Id. 7, 2017, Exhibit List). (D.E. 1132.) + +9. On December 1 0I ebruary 2, 2018, February 16, 2018 and March 2, 2018, of his trial exhibits. Pursuant to the Clerk's pm-Epstein made a rolling p 41c,iripo• n to marking guidelin xhib A), on March 5, 2018, Epstein served his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List, which identi h of the exhibits individually. (D.E. 1237.) These exhibits were comprised of the : (a) exhibits already produced in this case; (b) exhibits concerning L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (the Intervenors/ three clients); (c) exhibits relating to a defamation lawsuit filed in 2015 against Alan Dershowitz (one of Epstein's attorneys); (d) printouts from current website and verdicts and judgments referenced on the website; (e) property records; and (t) documents from the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) action. + +10. At the March 8, 2018, hearing, in response to Motion to Strike Untimely Supplemental Exhibits, the Court found that the exhibits Epstein produced on February 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018, were untimely and could not be used at trial. While 47 of the exhibits are the subject of a request for an in camera review because of privilege claims asserted by and the Intervenors, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe,2 the remaining exhibits consist of, documents produced in this and the underlying cases and public records. + +11. Now that no trial order is yet in place, and because, as ASOained below, cannot claim surprise by any of the additional exhibits of otherwise be prejudiced by Epstein's identification of the subject exhibits, E r t sts permission to amend i his Exhibit List to include a narrowed list of the previo exhibits and other exhibits Epstein deems appropriate. + +Epstein respectfully requests an r ing him permission to amend his Exhibit List and to revisit the Court's earlier ru exhibits were untimely and cannot be used at tria1.3 The documents Epstein seeks add relevant, do not include any of the documents claims are privileged's, me as any "surprise" to and will not prejudice in light of the ti trittic • of the disclosure. + +# 1 AR A\ + +2 In light of the pending request for an in camera review, the request for relief set forth in this Motion does not pertain to those 47 exhibits. + +3To date, the Court's rulings on that Motion have not been memorialized in a written order. + +&#x27;Epstein has filed a Motion for an in camera review of the 47 exhibits. (D.E. 1319, 1320.)

I. Amendment of Exhibit Lists is Timely Under the Circumstances and is Allowed Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Pretrial Stipulation.

There is no trial order in place. However, amendments to the parties' Exhibit Lists are permissible pursuant to the Court's July 20, 2017 Trial Order, and the parties' December 22, 2017 Joint Pretrial Stipulation. The July 20, 2017 Order provided in pertinent part:

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witness disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached t Pm-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragrap E, absent agreement specificallystated in the Pre-Trial or order of the Court upon good cause shown. ...

(D.E. 938 at I G. (emphasis added).)

In addition, in their December 22, 2017, Pretrial p la , the parties expressly agreed that they "do not waive their right to amend their Ex i ' 1 t nd to identify additional objections for those exhibits that have not yet been disci provided to correspond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists." (D.E. 1132 at 2) (e phasis added).

Thus, an amendment shout ed based on the Pretrial Stipulation alone. In fact, it would be an abuse of discreti Court to decline the requested amendment. See City of Opa Loca v. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (because the parties' pre-trial stipulation allow r amendments to the stipulation to list exhibits and witnesses, the JCC abused his discretio ymg the motion to amend). See also Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Browa e, Inc., 174 So. 3d 1037, 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) ("The Pretrial Stipulation is a powerful blueprint that fully enables a well-run and fair trial. It is the policy of the law to encourage and uphold stipulations in order to minimize litigation and expedite the resolution of disputes.").

II. The Scope and Focus of the Trial was Established in December 2017.

At the November 27, December 5 and December 7, 2017, hearings the Court established the scope and focus of the trial. Specifically, the Court made evidentiary rulings of the type of evidence that would be allowed at trial and made findings about the extent to which would be able to present evidence about his three clients' cases. Those rulings required Epstein's trial team to reevaluate their trial strategy and the supporting evidence, whic ted in an amended Exhibit List. Now that the Fourth District Court of Appeal has up Court's Order severing the claims, Epstein will again need to re-evaluate his t and supporting evidence.

III. Will Not Otherwise be Prejudiced by a II lament.

"While a trial judge has broad discretion in Ss, • i whether to ... permit introduction of an exhibit not disclosed pursuant to a pre c' e . . . the trial judge's discretion should be guided primarily by whether the 'objec Aict • aie p would be prejudiced by the admission of the evidence." Tomlinson-McKenzie ' 718 So. 2d 394, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Binger v. Pest Control, 40 So. 310, 1313, 1314 (Fla. 1981)). Accord Gaspar's Passage, LLC v. RaceTrac Petro ., No. 2D17-55, 2018 WL 1613745, at \*8 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 4, 2018) ("The trial bused its discretion by denying Gaspar's motion to amend its exhibit list in Augus 201. several weeks before trial. The intended exhibits became relevant as a result of the pleadings, but again, the trial court failed to conduct the required prejudice analysis before denying the motion.").

As the Fourth District explained in Tomlinson-McKenzie:

The objecting party is prejudiced by the admission of such evidence if the party might have taken some action to protect itself had it had timely notice of the witness or exhibit, and there exists no other

alternatives to alleviate the prejudice. The supreme court, in Binger, stated that

Prejudice in this sense refers to the surprise in fact of the objecting party, and it is not dependent on the adverse nature of the testimony. Other factors which may enter into the trial court's exercise of discretion are: (i) the objecting party's ability to cure the prejudice or, . . . [its] independent knowledge of the existence of the witness; (ii) the calling party's possible intentional, or bad faith, noncompliance with the pretrial order; and (iii) the possible disruption of the orderly and efficient trial of the case (or other cases).

Id. (quoting Binger, 401 So. 2d at 1314). In Tomlinson-McKenzie, the appellate court found that "appellees could not have been prejudiced by the introduction of the surveillance tape [at trial] in the sense that:

'prejudice . . . refers to the surprise in fact of the objecting party' because the motion to amend the witness and exhibit list was filed several months prior to the actual trial date. In addition, the other factors set out in Binger militate strongly toward admission of the surveillance tape. There was no finding that appellants failed to comply with the pretrial order in bad faith. The record reflects that appellants moved to amend the witness and exhibit list as soon as the surveillance tape became available. Further, an objecting party may not, having closed its eyes to the existence of evidence prior to trial, claim that the admission of that evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of the case.

718 So. 2d at 396.

Similarly, here, Edwards cannot be prejudiced by the introduction of the subject exhibits because this Motion to Amend his Exhibit List is being filed before the actual trial date has even been reset. See id. "In addition, the other factors set out in Binger militate strongly toward admission of the [subject exhibits]." Id. "There was no finding that appellants failed to comply with the pretrial order in bad faith." Id. Epstein's current counsel had not been retained when the Court entered its July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial. Nevertheless, both Epstein and [REDACTED] filed Exhibit Lists after the deadline set forth in that Order. The request to amend is not

made in bad faith but, rather, necessitated by the change in the scope and focus of the trial as determined by this Court in December 2017. Epstein's new counsel took steps in good faith after that hearing to reevaluate all evidence compiled to determine how to best defend Epstein's case and determined an amendment to Epstein's Exhibit List was warranted. "Further, [ ] may not, having closed [his] eyes to the existence of evidence prior to trial, claim that the a mission of that evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of the case." Id.

IV. The Exhibits are Relevant.

'Se

Epstein seeks to amend his Exhibit List to be allowed to add that are relevant to this litigation to include both a substantially modified list of rte identified on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List (not including the nts that claims arc privileged and are currently subject to a request for jttsle e reviews and any other documents Epstein may determine are relevant.

- V A. Exhibits from the Prod is Case.

On his November 16, 201 List, Epstein identified at No. 13, "All documents produced by any party or non- this matter." Epstein made a rolling production of those exhibits on December 19 and March 2, 2018, which included: (1) documents produced by (2) do ts p cluced by Wackenhut Security; (3) documents produced by Michael Legamaro RRA investor); and (4) documents produced by other third parties. On his March Jerk's Trial Exhibit List, Epstein identified each of the documents produced under this general category individually. Because the subject documents were already produced in this case, and Epstein produced them to again in December 2017 and March 2018 as "trial

&#x27;Should the Court find that the 47 documents are not privileged, Epstein will amend his Exhibit List to add those exhibits as well.

exhibits," could not be surprised or prejudiced by the introduction of these items at trial — a trial which has yet to be reset.

B. Exhibits Relating to L.M.. E.W.. and Jane Doe.

On his November 16, 2017, Exhibit List, Epstein identified at No. 323, "All public records and news articles relating to ... any witnesses listed by either party." During the November 29, December 5 and December 7, 2017, hearings, the Court advised the parties tha n would essentially need to prove each allegation of his original Complaint, inclu • allegation that three clients' (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) claims against Eps eak." The Court also indicated it would allow to discuss his three cy ' c s against Epstein and advised that his three clients would testify at to

Because of these rulings, Epstein's course it, Si t eit focus from defending probable cause to providing additional evidence to sup lks" that clients' claims were weak at the time Epstein filed the original p ing. light of the Court's rulings that L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe could testify in this rosecution action, Epstein's counsel re-inventoried the information obtained from tens e background research on each of clients in the underlying cases and con additional background research on them in preparation for crossexamining these esses to the weakness of their respective cases and their credibility. This was a large ing because MI three clients have extensive criminal histories relating to inct ughout the state. Epstein made a rolling production of these documents to on February 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018, and then listed them individually on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List.

The documents directly relate to witnesses' credibility, trustworthiness and background. L.M. and E.W. have both been arrested for prostitution. L.M. admitted to law

enforcement that she was involved in prostitution because her mother was a prostitute. All three clients have been arrested for shoplifting, have drug problems and have admitted to lying. In fact, during her deposition in her lawsuit against Epstein, L.M. provided testimony that contradicted a sworn statement she gave to the FBI and then admitted that she lied to the FBI in that statement. L.M. clearly perjured herself and Epstein should be entitled to use documents to challenge her credibility at trial.

Because represents L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe and is full f evidence of their pasts already provided in the underlying civil cases, none of t s tion can or does come as a surprise to him. As such, should not e ed to hide behind the purportedly "late" disclosure of the documents and the C AV s d allow Epstein to amend his Exhibit List to identify these exhibits. The majo ' S, t "more than 700 newly identified exhibits" that complained about re t category. Epstein plans to review the documents already produced and subst Ily w the number of exhibits disclosed in this category to the extent that the Co to exclude them was based on the large number of newly identified exhibits.

C. Man De

On his 5, 20 8, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List, Epstein identified exhibits relating to a defamation I filed in January 2015 against Alan Dcrshowitz (one of Epstein's attom se documents were produced to under Epstein's Exhibit No. 323 (public records of any witness) in February 2018.

In the Dershowitz action, alleged:

6Bmdley J. and Paul G. Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-15-000072.

attack his reputation and character: alleged that Dershowitz made a media assault upon him (and Paul G. Cassell) to

DERSHOWITZ initiated a massive ublic media assau reputation and character of J. G. CASSEL accusing them of intentionally lying in t having leveled knowingly false accusations against t DERSHOWITZ, without ever conducting any creditability of the accusations, and of havin the extent that their willful misconduct disbarment. Ag LAAv ,of dant n of the ethically to and required

(Dershowitz Complaint, 1 17.)

In April 2016, i, Cassell ers witz resolved their respective claims and and Cassell informed the C e filing of their action against Dershowitz was a "tactical mistake." (Dershowitz C ti ithdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.)

In order to maximize his very on his claims against Dershowitz, had to and did allege that his ad recovered (from any effects of Epstein's suit against him) and that Dershow. ' e tory public statements were the sole source of harm to his reputation. Now that as admitted that suing Dershowitz was a tactical mistake, and can obtain no further fin ial gain from claiming that Dershowitz is responsible for the harm to reputation, once again claims that Epstein is the sole cause of harm to his reputation. Epstein, therefore, identified exhibits from the Dershowitz defamation lawsuit that contradict this position. Because was a party to the Dershowitz lawsuit, the documents arc no surprise to In fact, it was who made those allegations in that lawsuit, and he cannot and

Despite having previously been the victim of character accassination by the Defendant ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S associate and client, Jeffrey Epstein, J. eniovs a highly favorable national reputation particularly related to his work in defending the rights of child victims of sexual abuse.

(Dershowitz, Complaint, 1 8, emphasis added.)

will not be prejudiced by allowing relevant exhibits from that lawsuit to be identified now. Accordingly, Epstein asks the Court to allow him to amend his Exhibit List to identify exhibits relating to the v. Dershowitz litigation.

I). Website and Verdicts.

On his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List, Epstein identified printouts from current website and verdicts and judgments referenced on the These documents, too, were produced to under Epstein's Exhibit No. 32 records of any witness) in February 2018. On his website, touts his jury v t , uding verdicts he has received since Epstein filed suit (\$7.1 million, \$5.7 million mr n, etc.). It is important for the jury to understand and see how has not s from Epstein's filing of the lawsuit against him. Like the other exhibits, these cp, are no surprise to as they i s come directly from his website or relate to (Ii • dbce was directly involved in. Accordingly, this Court should permit Epstein to ame is E it List now to identify those documents.

E. Pro e .

p y Other public records E e ein ced to in February 2018 as part of his Exhibit No. 323 (public records witness) included real property ownership records. Epstein identifi "fically on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. The documents the jury how success after Epstein filed suit has allowed him to invest' xpensive and larger real estate. These documents are public records which directly involve and transactions of which he has direct knowledge. therefore cannot claim surprise and Epstein should be allowed to amend his Exhibit List to identify these documents. See Gaspar's Passage, LLC, No. 2D17-55, 2018 WL 1613745, at \*8 ("[1]f, as Gaspar's counsel alleged, some of the exhibits were public record, RaceTrac would have difficulty

establishing prejudice. Indeed, the transcript reflects that RaceTrac was aware of at least the property appraiser records—which are public record—because its expert had relied on a report that incorporated those records) (citing Tomlinson—McKenzie, 718 So. 2d at 396 ("[A]n objecting party may not, having closed its eyes to the existence of evidence prior to trial, claim that the admission of that evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of the case.")).

F. CVRA Documents.

has taken the position that his involvement in the Cr1 inc3 • ,s' Rights Act action against the United States Government was a motive for Eps m t suit against him. Because has made it clear that he intends for that ac p a significant role in his presentation of his case, Epstein produced to Mit , c uments from that action in December 2017, February 2018 and March 2018 th Se e ed to use as trial exhibits and then individually identified the documents on his c \ , 18, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List.

Contrary to position, cri asiren pursuing the CVRA action at the time Epstein filed this litigation. Rather, in Au in his clients' best interest to clients' Motion on notice of his a of firm, Rosenfeld & RRA informed the Federal Court that it was not at action. In February 2009, the Federal Court denied the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Other than putting the Court did nothing in the case during his tenure at Rothstein, ). In fact, he did nothing until September 13, 2010 — almost a year after and Epstein filed this litigation.

Epstein should be allowed to present evidence to the jury to show that was, in fact, not pursuing the CVRA action, the Government's defenses and Epstein's limited involvement in that action. himself identified the entire action on his Exhibit List. Trial Exhibit No. 113.) While he has produced certain documents from that action, he has not listed

them individually as required by the Clerk's guidelines. Epstein, therefore, should be allowed to amend his Exhibit List to identify documents from the CVRA action.

CONCLUSION

"Although a judge has broad discretion in determining whether to exclude evidence due to a party's failure to disclose the evidence within the time required by a pretrial order, the exclusion of such evidence is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the mpelling circumstances and only after the judge has made a case-specific dete ' to whether admission of the evidence would result in actual procedural prejudice jd tkne ting party." Med. Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines, 911 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla. 1st DC ) g Binger). According to Binger, any prejudice of late-disclosed exhibits must y "surprise in fact." 401 So. 2d at 1314. As set forth above, the subject docum uced to as trial exhibits in February and March 2018 and are document already had in his possession, or of which was already aware through litigat n in 's underlying client cases against Epstein or his own defamation lawsuit against D h ' ,,'or because of their public nature. Furthermore, the documents go the very heart of s defense—that cannot establish that Epstein did not have probable cause t wit against , that clients' cases were weak, and that h tape of Ms. P soccer es. See Tomlinson-McKenzie, 718 So. 2d at 396 ("The surveillance 'fting in a car for extended periods of time and sitting on bleachers at her son's goes to the very heart of this case—the extent of her injuries. The surveillance tape provides a direct challenge to Ms. Prince's assertions that the injuries sustained in the accident diminished her capacity to earn a living because she could not sit for extended periods of time as required by her job. Under the circumstances, the trial judge's omission of the surveillance tape was not harmless error.").

Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and allow him to amend his Exhibit List as set forth herein.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on April 27, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev ite 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3

By: /s/Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link 60 1)

Kara Berard bach (FBN 44903)

Rachel J BN 577251)

Prima linIcrocklaw.com

Pri Cfra(alinkrocklaw.com

achel©IinIcrocklaw.com

: Tinaelinkrocklaw.com

dary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+
+

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Bro [REDACTED] Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

Tuesday - January 30, 2018

Home | Links | Contact Us | Locations | FAQ | SEARCH | Site | Enter Search Term | Sub | ?

ABOUT THE OFFICE

PUBLICATIONS

NEWSROOM

CAREERS

LEGAL COMMUNITY

FEES & COSTS

SHARON R. BOCK
Clerk & Comptroller
Palm Beach County

Evidence - Civil

PRE-MARKING GUIDELINES

COURT SERVICES

PUBLIC RECORDS

PUBLIC FUNDS

OTHER SERVICES

Go Back To: Home / Court Services

Contact Information

(501) 355-2998
Email Us

Search Records Now

COURT SERVICES

    +
  • CIRCUIT CIVIL COURT
    • +
  • COUNTY CIVIL COURT
    • +
  • CRIMINAL COURT
    • +
  • E-FILING
    • +
  • EVIDENCE (CIVIL) PRE-MARKING GUIDELINES
    • +
  • EVIDENCE STATUS
    • +
  • JURY DUTY
    • +
  • SELF SERVICE CENTER
    • +
  • TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS
    • +
  • UNFIED FAMILY COURT
    • +

Exhibit List Requirements:
+ (An updated, legible, and specific exhibit list MUST be provided to the trial clerk on the first day of trial)
+ The list is to include the Case #, the party name, party type (PRIF., Resp., Mother, Father, etc.), exhibit #, description of the exhibit and hearing/trial date.
+ (The exhibits must be numbered sequentially)
+ (An exhibit list which states "all", "any" and "any and all" will not be accepted.

Exhibit Requirements:

All exhibits that will be entered into evidence must be pre-marked using the Civil Exhibit Card Template and affixed to the back of the exhibit.
+ All exhibits must be marked for ID on the exhibit card.
+ Numbers and letters only; No symbols
+ Exhibit #s: No more than 10 characters including spaces
+ The exhibits list must be numbered sequentially.
+ Large demonstrative poster boards or items to be used in court for evidence must be accompanied by a smaller version for submittions to the Clerk. Exhibits must be stapled, bound or fastened together with an ACCO type fastener (two-pronged locking paper compressor).
+ NO NOTEBOOK BINDERS
+ NO RUBBER BANDS
+ NO PAPER CLIPS

Depositions and pleadings are NOT marked as exhibits, EXCEPT:
+ When a party would like the court to take judicial notice of any document or pleading; or
+ When the document or pleading is published to the jury.

Civil Exhibit Card Template
+ PDF
+DOWNLOAD

Exhibit Labeling Requirement:

Use the Civil Exhibit Card Template provided; you may do one of the following:
+ Make copies of the card for each exhibit; or
+ Use Avery labels 5163 which can then be adhered to the BACK of the page. (Template can be scanned onto Avery Labels).
+ The exhibit card must be filed out completely and legibly.
+ Must have case #, party type circled, and exhibit#.
+ Tape the card to the BACK of each exhibit (no clips).

Frequently Asked Questions

+

What type of case is handled in the Circuit Civil Court?
+ Where do I file a petition/complaint/case involving damages over \$15,000?
+ How can I file a pleading today, if I can't be at the clerk's office until after 5:00 p.m?
+ Do you need an attorney to deposit a will with the Clerk & Comptroller's office?
+ VIEW ALL

Tuesday - January 30, 2018

Home | Links | Contact Us | Locations | FAQ | SEARCH | Site Enter Search Term | Sub | 7

ABOUT THE OFFICE

PUBLICATIONS

NEWSROOM

CAREERS

LEGAL COMMUNITY

FEES & COSTS

(Any exhibit will multiple sections should be designated by number and letter, LE1A, LB, LC)
(etc)

If you have any questions, contact the Clerk's office at (561) 355-2986 between the hours of 8 a.m. - 4 p.m., Monday - Friday, excluding holidays.

Site Map | ADA / Accessibility | Privacy Policy & Terms of Use | Employee Information & Ethics Hotline

© 2017 Clerk & Comptroller, Palm Beach County

Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic email to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.

Pursuant to 119.12 (2), F.S., the custodian of public records is Hampton Peterson, 561.355.2986.

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e49656010e7d5d034d131a89e6e59bb6c7280e65 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/EFTA02766964.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 35506, + "elapsed_seconds": 25.71, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_17_Picture_101.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_110.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_114.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_115.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_125.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_126.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_127.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_128.jpeg", + "_page_17_Picture_129.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nMOTION TO ALLOW AMENDME \nEPSTEIN'S\nIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OD CTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 356.22308349609375, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 356.22308349609375, + 424.10302734375 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 424.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECORD FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.8860168457031, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.8860168457031, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 AR A\\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 344.0654296875, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 344.0654296875, + 389.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 389.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Amendment of Exhibit Lists is Timely Under the Circumstances and is \nAllowed Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Pretrial Stipulation.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.79541015625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.79541015625, + 100.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 100.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. The Scope and Focus of the Trial was Established in December 2017.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 463.3153076171875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 463.3153076171875, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. Will Not Otherwise be Prejudiced by a II lament.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 438.4842834472656, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 438.4842834472656, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. The Exhibits are Relevant.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 248.177978515625, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 248.177978515625, + 252.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 252.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- V \nA. Exhibits from the Prod is Case.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 389.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 363.7691955566406, + 389.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 363.7691955566406, + 417.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 417.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Exhibits Relating to L.M.. E.W.. and Jane Doe.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 391.3241882324219, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 391.3241882324219, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Man De", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 500.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 500.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I). Website and Verdicts.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 313.4571533203125, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 313.4571533203125, + 169.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 169.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Pro e .", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 293.3999938964844, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 293.3999938964844, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. CVRA Documents.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 245.5872344970703, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 245.5872344970703, + 224.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 224.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Evidence - Civil", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 200.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRE-MARKING GUIDELINES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 279.072, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 279.072, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 221.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Contact Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 453.49199999999996, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 453.49199999999996, + 232.46999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Search Records Now", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 269.73 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 58.751999999999995, + 281.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURT SERVICES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 370.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit Requirements:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 321.57000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit Labeling Requirement:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 569.4300000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 81 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 24 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766964" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_101.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_101.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e56280e7dbc39671344b8024a0b84eddcef9f7d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_101.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:25ce5e0b602bb2aa8b7f9d8d367ac617bb4de1ffcbb6e77db4791e38ba6c5b39 +size 7125 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_110.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_110.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4c1459a15e3bda95bc02b567aaf0deabb61101d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_110.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5da9c813bca672e50c9d61637494226a2cdf472c16ad5051f3472982f377de1a +size 6712 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_114.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_114.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7b7c70e29c0340c828f0480d49d917344ec0ca2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_114.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5430ff787f6802d82be3469822e317e8af02a26646ecca8c6bd9953578592a92 +size 5637 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_115.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_115.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0269781dff605e7993ebb801c1718241bc6e5f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_115.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:101748dd46fe18bcf91f62e3e63387162064541c31741d0854193075d615b9d6 +size 5628 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_125.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_125.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..449ed41b40948bce7ec27079136f4a51e83f1dbb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_125.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bc9bf0551ea1902390b06d4c7f3b82361ccd7ea4a74879149e73c3d3e11b8921 +size 6057 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_126.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_126.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3945a08a6bf64f6f2ea8411eca6db55263d5f77d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_126.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1e776b29dc74492582e52a6cde2a224a11cec89f0619e0ba6d2fb0b0f6b33d47 +size 6235 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_127.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_127.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85114d28d463f14afd2d374f6b6b0ef4a6cb12d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_127.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:155b65a5581eb0d843d1faccf5a2eaf8ed82569a7c364c844e010d6ec22d3ce4 +size 5943 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_128.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_128.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4c72a675ec18c8152e1212d12817358c56f7e02 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_128.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:685947e14b82478f842873bba75c22bb37ca47671a71a7da8144880391745d60 +size 5241 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_129.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_129.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a107d33981bb29965cdb8e58a716eca85be857ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766964/_page_17_Picture_129.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4f136ffd2ca19faf3254f36d16f072befd82bca4137221c1ab4bd1e6eae2bd69 +size 6361 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c1e231a7c9613f08b1f09ec4b73f36e77d71933 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIvD3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE EY EPSTEIN'S TSIEtEXPERT WITNESS + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey be allowed to disclose an expert witn est stat : pstein") respectfully renews his request to + +### < it!' ODUCTION + +This case is currently nCse )for trial and, therefore, Counter-Plaintiff (S) will not be iced by Epstein's renewed request to disclose his expert witness to opine on matter egal ethics and responsibility, probable cause and professional reputatio + +C O eSA + +# JJACKGROUND + +- 1. Pursuant to this Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial (D.E. 938), the disclosure of experts retained to formulate an expert opinion was due 60 days prior to trial. At that time, trial was set on December 5, 2017, making the deadline October 6, 2017. + +2. Epstein's current trial counsel were retained after this deadline and, on November 6, 2017, in light of the uncertainty of what issues would be tried and the numerous outstanding evidentiary issues, moved for a continuance of the trial and to extend the pre-trial deadlines, including an extension of expert disclosures. (D.E. 1035.) + +3. On November 14, 2017, the Court granted the continuance request and continued the special set trial to March 13, 2018. The Court's Order, however, did not a request for an extension of the pre-trial deadlines. (D.E. 1057.) If that re new deadline for expert disclosures would have been January 12, 201 **Epstein's re granted, the** + +4. Counsel went before the Court on November ruling. The Court granted Motion to reconfi g pre-trial deadlines because of his concern over additional discovery. The rt ~otCd, however, that it would permit additional limited discovery upon further 1086.) **, to clarify the Court's** + +mot' 5. On November 29, Dece 5 December 7, 2017, the parties participated in extensive special set hearings whe urt made rulings relating to the issues and evidence to be presented at trial. Altho ourt did not reach all of the issues, in light of the rulings made during those hearin r ip believed he needed to retain an expert to testify about legal ethics and respo tlity, robable cause and Mr. professional reputation. Epstein retained C. ► **mah, III for this purpose and disclosed him on December 15, 2017.** + +**+n December 15, 2017, Epstein also filed his initial Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness. (D.E. 1119.) The Motion was heard on January 17, 2018, but denied because the Court found the request untimely, not because of any undue prejudice to** + +**7. On January 18, 2018, Epstein served his Updated Answers to Expert Interrogatories which expounded upon the opinions Mr. would testify about.** + +8. The March 13, 2018, trial was postponed in light of the appellate proceedings. To date, the trial has not been reset. + +# ARGUMENT + +was not prejudiced by Epstein's initial request, and he again will not be prejudiced. At most, may desire to take Mr. deposition, as Epstein did of expert witness in December 2017. Astutely, this Court recognized AS" 2018, hearing, striking an expert witness is a drastic measure: March 8, + +> [A] request to strike a witness is a drastic and cx reserved only in rare circumstances, especially whe he we're dealing with an expert which is otherwise quid t estify to what he's going to testify. + +(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 93:16-20.) Indeed, "[a]s indicated 1310 (Fla. 1981), the exclusion of an unlisted should pertain in only the most compellin when the opposing party is not prej A w] not otherwise shown, ft the w' Pest Control, 401 So. 2d estimony is a drastic remedy which nces. . . . Binger further indicates that e late disclosure, and compelling circumstances d generally be allowed to testify." Walters v. Keebler Co., 652 So. 2d 976, 977 (Fla. 1 A 1995). + +Here, there i is qualified to testify. Further, due to , At no on that Mr. bifurcation of .( Niterclaim and ensuing appeal, there is sufficient time before Countercl et for trial for to take the witness's deposition. Epstein will not object to ning discovery for that limited purpose. Significantly, can claim no surprise because he has known since December 2017 the opinions of which Mr. will testify.' Because there is no showing nor can there be any genuine assertion of prejudice or + +first disclosed his expert's name on October 6, 2017, but did not disclose the subject matter of his testimony until October 20, 2017, after the disclosure deadline. The Court, + +other compelling circumstances, excluding Mr. would be a drastic measure, and this Court should allow him to testify. See Walters, 652 So. 2d at 977. + +# CONCLUSION + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court grant this renewed Motion and allow his disclosure of Mr. as an expert witness. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the listed on the Service List below on April 29, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal rstt t o Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROC 1555 Palm B Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm da 33401 (561) 727 Soli ) 727-3601 [fax] + +. Link + +ink (FBN 602991) + +Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +14achel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) + +Primary: ScottQlinkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +however, deniec in's request to strike expert. Epstein disclosed his expert a mere two months after expert's report was disclosed. + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of [REDACTED] rc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..108e77691188398b119c509ac0b050d9955e5f82 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983/EFTA02766983.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766983.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 11869, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nRENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE \nEY EPSTEIN'S TSIEtEXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 339.3125 + ], + [ + 497.4599914550781, + 339.3125 + ], + [ + 497.4599914550781, + 374.53125 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 374.53125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "< it!' ODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.7899932861328, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 355.7897033691406, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 355.7897033691406, + 451.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 237.7899932861328, + 451.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JJACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 352.2786865234375, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 352.2786865234375, + 586.9925079345703 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 586.9925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 362.6252136230469, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 362.6252136230469, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.4591369628906, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766983" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a23c14a0f17f76b76b7836105b8a08a0672f5882 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.md @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. EENT'H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffs, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTE ISTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +# MOTION FOR STATUS COiIIItBR NCE + +J. by and through his u counsel, hereby requests a Uniform Motion Calendar Status Conference based oj ed Order issued by the Fourth District of Appeal on April 27, 2018. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached I 30th day of April, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: dvitale©searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Plaintiff J. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████ J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Status Conference Page 3 of 3 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marariklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +esA Co + +IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA +FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +April 27, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) + +Appellee / Respondent(s) + +**BY ORDER OF THE COURT:** + +ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. Although petitioner correctly asserted that the entire action was not "at issue" within the meaning of rule 1.440 when the prior notice for trial was filed, the trial date at issue has passed, and respondent has filed a new notice for trial; further, ORDERED that this Court's March 29, 2018 order staying the setting of a trial date is discharged. The trial court may set a trial date within the time set forth in rule 1.440(c) from the March 20, 2018 notice for trial. No motion for rehearing will be entertained; further, + +ORDERED that petitioner's March 19, 2018 request for oral argument is denied; further, + +ORDERED that petitioner's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees and costs is denied; further, + +ORDERED that respondent's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees is denied. + +CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. + +Served: + +cc: + +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Jack Alan Goldberger +Clerk Palm Beach + +John Scarola +Nichole J. Segal +Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +Philip M. Burlington +Rachel Jenny Glasser + +dl + +![]()**LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk** +Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_3_Picture_145.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d57639a357a9aba2159859effe7faec3942fb0a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/EFTA02766988.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4097, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.89, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_145.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nHt. EENT'H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR STATUS COiIIItBR NCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 415.10968017578125, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 415.10968017578125, + 343.10302734375 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 343.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 142.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.08, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 55.08, + 256.77 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766988" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/_page_3_Picture_145.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/_page_3_Picture_145.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6267076dacbd75ce3e5bd71655e89959971af28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766988/_page_3_Picture_145.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b52ea7a0087168530da0c1533bcbc001901a0abf9955bbd9326af750f95fa004 +size 20812 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..338a30badd23042cb54f033ef9f9c055ae0b9208 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.md @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT RESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR STATUS C EPSTEIN'S NCE + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E for Status Conference filed by Counter-P requests that the following items be ey J. stein"), hereby responds to the Motion en, and respectfully at the status conference. + +A + +Cos + +- 1. Trial setting, in udin estimated number of days needed for the trial in light of the issues and number of tnesses to be presented. estimated ten days. + - 2. Th s +- d counsels' unavailability. Epstein's counsel is unavailable during the folio " s: : wmpcd une 11-15, June 21-29 and July 2-6, 2018. See Epstein's Counsels' Notice of Unavad ttached as Exhibit A. +- 3. Setting hearings on pending issues. has eleven pending issues and Epstein has twelve pending issues. See updated list of pending issues attached as Exhibit B. +- 4. The need and deadline for a new Pm-Trial Stipulation based on the of the panics' claims. + +# 5. Other trial related issues. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on May 1, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vita Searcy, De rota, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Pal kes Boulevard West ch, FL 33409 me jsx@searcylaw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terryteam@searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. law. •m + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suitk 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 + +By:/ L nk + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken Rachel J. GI Primary: Primary: Prim S TrovQ1inkrocklaw.com BN 44903) 7251) klaw.com krocklaw.com acheVililinkrocklaw.com + +(S\rCounselfor e Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +# C'ERVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb0FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseetiendant/Counter-Plaintiff + +J. + +.1. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad®eplIc.com Co-Counsel or J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergerfaagwpa.com smahoney@agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaint Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112 casselltalaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor C i !for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe C + +Jay H Jay o e Associates e Blvd., Suite 250 1 c Ile, FL 32211 h ell.com ited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe + +Gs' + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Def notice of their unavailability as folio t J y Epstein ("Epstein") hereby provides + +- June 11 e 018 +- June 21 29, 2018 Ju —'6, 2018 + +Accor dersigned counsel requests that no proceedings, trial, hearings or depositio uled during these periods. + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# COUNSELS' NOTICE \ freAVAILABILITY + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm B ch, FL 33409 me law.com law.com scarolate law. .m terryteamesearcylaw.eom Co-Counselor endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. m art & Shipley, P.A. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suit; 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [ + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rocken cMM 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (F 251) Primary: Sco inkr aw.com Primary: K inkrocklaw.com Primary: achel(ainkrocklaw.com Seco' T\* linkrocklaw.com rov(4linkrocklaw.com Eservicealinkrocklaw.com + +(S'/Si e Counsel fo r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLAnpellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Co-CounseiSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## Epstein v. Rothstein and Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800 Pending Motions - as of 5/1/18 (In order of filing) + +| No. | Motion/Request | | Response/Related Docs | | Amount of Time Requested | +|-----|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | Date Filed | Document | | +| 1 | 10/5/17 | Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against [REDACTED] and His Counsel [D.E. 1009] | 11/8/17 | [REDACTED] Response in Opposition [D.E. 1041] | 15 minutes | +| 2 | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1051] | 11/22/17 | Epstein's Opposition [D.E. 1087] | 30 minutes | +| | 11/17/17 | [REDACTED] Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1077] | | | | +| 3 | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V only; Section I addressed at 12/7/17 hearing) [D.E. 1100 and 1101]
[Heard on 12/7/17, but not completed] | N/A | | 1.5 - 2 hours | +| | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege [D.E. 1102 and 1103] | | | | + +| No. | Motion/Request | | Response/Related Docs | | Amount of Time Requested | +|-----|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | Date Filed | Document | | +| 4 | 12/11/17 | [REDACTED] Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1113] | 1/8/18 | Epstein's Opposition [D.E. 1137] | 30 minutes | +| | | | 3/3/18 | Notice of Filing Appendix in Support [Sealed] [D.E. 1242] | | +| 5 | 12/22/17
1/25/18
2/22/18
3/7/18 | Objections to Deposition Designations [D.E. 1130, 1159, 1222, 1260] | | | 2.5 - 3 hours | +| 6 | 1/10/18 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements -- Motion was denied as to [REDACTED] three clients on 2/28/18, but Court reserved ruling on other tort claimants [D.E. 1140] | 1/16/18 | Edwards' Response in Opposition [D.E. 1150] | 30 minutes | +| 7 | 1/18/18 | [REDACTED] Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit No. 132 ( New York Post article) [D.E. 1151] | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Response in Opposition [D.E. 1179] | 30 minutes | +| 8 | 2/1/18 | Epstein's Motion in Limine on [REDACTED] Newly Disclosed Trial Exhibits and to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Who Were not Deposed in this Matter [D.E. 1176] | 2/15/18 | [REDACTED] Response [D.E. 1202] | 30 minutes | +| 9 | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice [D.E. 1178] | | | 15 minutes | +| 10 | 2/12/18 | [REDACTED] Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information [D.E. 1196]
----- | 2/22/18 | Epstein's Response [D.E. 1223] | 30 minutes | +| | 2/26/18 | [REDACTED] Reply [D.E. 1226] | | | | + +| No. | Motion/Request | | Response/Related Docs | | Amount of Time Requested | +|-----|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | Date Filed | Document | | +| 11 | 2/26/18 | [REDACTED] Motion to Compel RFA [D.E. 1225] | 3/3/18 | Epstein's Response in Opposition [D.E. 1249] | 15 minutes | +| 12 | 3/2/18 | [REDACTED] Motion in Limine to Limit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to Support Epstein's Claims Against [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [D.E. 1243] | 3/7/18 | Epstein's Response [D.E. 1263] | 30 minutes | +| 13 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Motion for Court's Permission to Alter Trial Evidence to Comply with Rule 2.425 [D.E. 1241] | | | 15 minutes | +| 14 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Motion for Court's Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of [REDACTED] Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] | | | | +| 15 | 3/5/18 | Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Master [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] | 3/6/18 | [REDACTED] Response [D.E. 1257] | 2 hours | +| | 4/4/18 | Epstein's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents [D.E. 1319] | | | | +| | 4/5/18 | Epstein's Supplemental Authority [D.E. 1320] | | | | +| 16 | 3/26/18 | [REDACTED] Motion to Change Case Caption | 3/29/18 | Epstein's Response [D.E. 1310] | | + +| | | Motion/Request | Response/Related Docs | Amount of Time | +|----|---------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------| +| | Date | | | Requested | +| | Filed | Document Date Filed | Document | | +| 17 | 3/29/18 | Epstein's Motion to Address Scheduling and | | | +| | | Professionalism [D.E. 1309) | A | | +| 18 | | Motion for Sanctions [D.E. 1318) | AS (To be filed] | | +| 19 | 4/11/18 | Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended | | | +| | | | (To be filed] I | 30 minutes | +| 20 | 4/16/18 | Motion to Take the Limited Deposition | Epstein's Response [D.E. 1330) | 15 minutes | +| 21 | 4/27/18 | Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit | | | +| | | | [To be filed] | 15 minutes | +| 22 | 4/29/18 | Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose | | | +| | | | [To be filed) | 15 minutes | +| 23 | 5/1/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify ' | (To be filed) | 15 minutes | +| | | his Trial Witnesses Af1 | | | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..319f2de2de6ecbe9462d62fb4414c1c4d00b9a4c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992/EFTA02766992.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,678 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02766992.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 20923, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nRESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION FOR STATUS C \nEPSTEIN'S \nNCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Other trial related issues. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.61000061035156, + 66.1868896484375 + ], + [ + 450.2818298339844, + 66.1868896484375 + ], + [ + 450.2818298339844, + 124.0889892578125 + ], + [ + 107.61000061035156, + 124.0889892578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C'ERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.77999877929688, + 423.1868896484375 + ], + [ + 386.9527282714844, + 423.1868896484375 + ], + [ + 386.9527282714844, + 480.7089538574219 + ], + [ + 220.77999877929688, + 480.7089538574219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.688, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.688, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSELS' NOTICE \\ freAVAILABILITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.704, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 433.13543701171875, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 433.13543701171875, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 178.704, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein v. Rothstein and \nCase No. 50-2009-CA-040800 \nPending Motions - as of 5/1/18 (In order of filing)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.616, + 54.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 509.51116943359375, + 54.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 509.51116943359375, + 96.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 275.616, + 96.8341064453125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02766992" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d64a3bc471dfce42b27b8d155a2f842f5143ead5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.md @@ -0,0 +1,786 @@ +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E pstein") moves to compel Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards')t the witnesses he actually intends to call at trial and the subject matter of their testimony, and states: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXvIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF E EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL COUNTIFJI-PIS NTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO !DENT HIS TRIAL WITNESSES + +#### IN'I' ROD UCTION + +Edwards' operati Witness List identifies a total of 169 witnesses, which includes 165 individual with esc d t f general categories (No. 77, "Any additional individuals identified as victims"; No Ep in's witnesses; No. 152, rebuttal witnesses; and No. 153, "All people on Jeffrey E to Visitor Log while he was in jail). Most of the listed witnesses have no personal owledge concerning malicious prosecution claims against Epstein or Epstein's probable cause for filing and continuing his proceeding against l=, making speculation as to the specific subject matter of their permissible testimony impossible. should be required to pare down this excessive number of witnesses for what should be less than + +a five-day malicious prosecution trial' and to identify the permissible subject matter about which the witnesses will testify. Without knowing which of the more than 169 witnesses will actually be called to testify at trial, who may be called from the general categories of witnesses who were not individually named, and what permissible testimony they will give, it is impossible for Epstein's counsel to properly prepare for the trial and Epstein will be substantially and unfairly rejudiced. Clearly, is attempting to try previously settled lawsuits involving his clients rather than the instant malicious prosecution cause of action. int P r e) so is plainly evidenced by the extensive grandstanding of his counsel, Jack Scam attempts to taint the jury pool and prevent Epstein's right to present: ress in numerous panning from 2013 to + +- "Trump is on a star-studded witness County Circuit Court that attome airing of Epstein's lurid lifes https://www.palmbeachpost separation-between-trum d-se epsteirt/WCIWNrtB pcoming trial in Palm Beach cafola promises will be the first public national-govt--politics/how-many-degreesffender-COsU (March 12, 2017). +- "A trial that pro f fFer the first public airing of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein' eti ties with teenage girls at his Palm Beach mansion is to be held in December.... httns://www.nalmbeachnost.comMews/crime--law/trialdate-set-fo it-against-billionaire-sex-offenderepsteaNJb PnxT9PK4AXk0mbLchBK/ (July 7, 2017). +- carol greed he would refrain from describing Epstein as "a billionaire Cl cd " "convicted child molester." He said he does intend to call ÷ seOtto testify. In a civil lawsuit, she claimed Epstein turned her into a x slave at age 15 when she was working at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.... While Trump, Prince Andrew and Clinton are also on Scarola's witness list, he has said it is doubtful he will call the three powerful men to testify." https://www.mynalmbeachrost.corn/news/crime--law/judge-delays-tries-reinrated-civil-trial-jeffrey-epstein/CmoGIvhJenQwhdL4ufW0HU (November 29, 2017). + +• &#x27; in claim, the parties malicious prosecution 'Before moved to separate his Counterclaim from believed the trial would require ten days. Without half of the action, action should require less than five days. + +- Attorney Jack Scarola said it will be the first time the victims will have a chance to tell their stories. + +jiiw ht • ww.palmbeachdailynews.cominews/local/newest-lawsuit-againstexpected-include-victim-testimony/CZ14s0ESb0Q4rib7njclhU (October 20, 2013). + +While this Court has stated that it will protect the judicial process and allow testimony "befitting of the known integrity of the history that has been pervasive in the 15'h JuLice cI Circuit,"2 intends to create a very different environment at trial. Indeed, E as li ed every conceivable person who may have had some connection, howev fight, t the criminal proceedings against Epstein or any civil proceedings against him, d e n those who had no connection at all (e.g., President Trump, former President Cli David Copperfield, to name only a few). The exhaustive list of witnesses includ st claimants who never Ac esy represented, the family members of tort claiman , t ,se who represented other tort claimants, law enforcement, investigators, dignitaries, ic o cials, Epstein's associates, and celebrities with whom Epstein has sociali with no connection at all to this malicious prosecution case. The vast maj o e witnesses have no place at the trial of this case. Their testimony would serve only to e or unfairly prejudice the jury and turn what should only be an orderly trial, f into an unrul twenty ye urely, if few key issues pertaining to a single claim of malicious prosecution, of multiple mini sex trials involving allegations of conduct from up to is allowed to present more than 169 witnesses, the potential for this triilto devolve into a circus extending well beyond any reasonable duration and resulting in a mistrial cannot be overstated. + +&#x27;March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript 28:1-7. (Exhibit A.)

WITNESS LISTS

In the last eight years, has filed nine Witness Lists and four Rebuttal Witness

Lists, each time increasing the number of witnesses, as follows:

  • June 30, 2010 Witness List (D.E. 100) 7 witnesses: 1 individual and 6 general categories.
  • June 25, 2013 Witness List (D.E. 638) 14 witnesses: 7 individuals and 7 general categories.
  • August 19, 2013 Rebuttal Witness List (D.E. 649) 2 1 individual and 1 general category.
  • January 7, 2014 Amended and Supplemental Witn List (D.F.
    • 791) 15 witnesses: 8 individuals and 7 general categories.
  • March 4, 2014 Rebuttal Witness List ( individual and 1 general category. 2 witnesses: 1
  • August 15, 2016 Second Amen Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 902) - 28 witnesses: viduals and 11 general categories.
  • August 25, 2016 R ess List (D.E. 905) 3 witnesses: 2 individuals and er I category.
  • August 31, 201 ird Amended and Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 907 14 witnesses: 13 individuals and 1 general category (in additio gust 15, 2016, List; not replacing — bringing the iota(to 42 nesses).
  • 3('2017 Fourth Amended and Supplemental Witness List . 935) — 1 witness: 1 individual (in addition to August 15, 6, and August 31, 2016 Lists; not replacing — bringing the total to 43 witnesses).
  • July 21, 2017 Fifth Amended and Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 939) - 158 witnesses: 153 individuals and 5 general categories.
  • October 6, 2017 Sixth Amended and Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 1010) - 159 witnesses: 154 individuals and 5 general categories.

  • October 16, 2017 Rebuttal Witness List (D.E. 1015) 2 witnesses: 1 individual and 1 general category.
  • November 9, 2017 Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List (D.E. 1042) - 169 witnesses: 165 individuals and 4 general categories (Operative List) (Exhibit B).

with an overly generalized and intentionally vague description: In his July 12, 2017, Interrogatories to =, Epstein attempted to discover the subject matter of each witness's testimony. For more than 120 of these witnesses, Edw Irick responded

Each of the witnesses listed below as numbered 25-15 th exception of records custodians) has information • mn he malicious prosecution elements or absence of proba ca e and malice. If called, each could provide informatio garding the truth of the claims prosecuted by agairfst Epstein, and the likelihood that the discovery conducted Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to pro poets of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecu dwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive

(8/11/17 Answers to Interrogatories) (E41 This general description provides no meaningful information about the sp t matter of each witness's testimony which should be provided at this stage. It is stating nothing more than that the witnesses will be testifying as to the issues proven at trial.

RULINGS OF THIS COURT

While e extent of Epstein's deposition testimony which would be allowed at trial, the gnized that the trial should proceed on a level playing field and that graphic type quest' would not be allowed:

I want to make sure that the record is clear, and that's this. I have an obligation, as both sides are well aware, to ensure that we are working on a level playing field to the extent that it is possible. I have the obligation, as Ms. Rockenbach points out, to be the gatekeeper of evidence and to ensure to the best of my ability that we are not going to be engaging in pejorative name-calling types of questioning just for the sole purpose of information.

\*\*\*

So to the extent that it would be needed to go in front of the jury, any questions that deal with the issue of Mr. Epstein's lawsuits brought by Mr. [REDACTED] on behalf of the respective clients, would be germane. And any invocation ... would be germane and relevant and found to be admissible. That's the core ruling of the Court. Now, when it comes to issues of general graphic questioning, such as what has been exemplified by way of the counter-defendant's motion, those will not be permitted.

(11/29/17 Tr. 70:18-71:6; 72:18-79:6).3

The Court further requested that the trial was not to be used to test Epstein's criminal guilt but, rather, should focus on [REDACTED] malicious prosecution claim:

I don't want this to turn into a case testing whether or not Epstein was an alleged serial child molester. It would not, in my view, pass muster legally, and I don't want to try this case twice.

I think that we should be extremely circumspect when it deals -- when we are dealing with global issues of molestation of graphic descriptions of any types of alleged molestation, except where we are dealing with claims that have been brought on behalf of those represented by Mr. Edwards.

The risk of error, if we go beyond that intended limitation, is significant. And I want to make sure that we, again, are focused on the elements of the claim. And whether it be for compensatory damages associated with Mr. [REDACTED] claim or punitive damages associated with Mr. [REDACTED] claim, we are still dealing with a malicious prosecution claim, solely a malicious prosecution claim.

And so to deviate from that direction would be precarious and concerning to the Court, in particular, because when we're dealing with issue of probable cause, we're focusing on -- as I've made clear -- not only Mr. Epstein's stated intent, but I fully intend to allow circumstantial evidence, inclusive of the invocation of the Fifth Amendment relevant questions pertaining to the plaintiff's -- the counter-plaintiff's, more precisely -- Mr. [REDACTED] position to explain to the jury why -- or to the Court -- why Mr. Epstein brought this claim, what were the true motivating factors concerning same.

3Excerpts of the November 29, 2017, transcript are attached as Exhibit D.

To allow this to intrude into allegations of serial molestation is dangerous and is concerning.

(11/29/17 Tr. 98:3-99:20) (emphasis added).

While the Court will allow to present evidence concerning his three clients' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) claims and general evidence about the number of other claims and role in litigating those matters, other evidence concerning claims of other claimants who were not represented by will not be allowed:

SCAROLA: Your Honor suggested -- and I thought that I • y u correctly -- that evidence with regard to other clai ac iled against Epstein would be relevant and material. And c y t is.

THE C URT: I believe what I said was th filed by Mr. or any claim that were made r st ten by a client represented by Mr.

(11/29/17 Tr. 96:6-14.)

So again, my ruling on tha with this issue, globally, further argument as victims that we are theib are questions that have to do wil~be allowed to be asked subject to o the multiplicity of the numerous th here as alleged.

(11/29/17 Tr. 118:22-119:3.)

... what m ay not be asked of Mr. and Mr. Epstein printally n ese cases or these issues, the global order of the C9d would e that those individual claims would not be subject to discussion as to the merits, as Mr. Scarola has stipulated. Ho ever, as it relates to both probable cause, i.e., motive and ~itce, the number of claims -- that is, speaking in terms of volume that Mr. Epstein was facing at the time that he brought the suit and continued the prosecution of that suit would be relevant. So that's the distinction being drawn by the Court, the detail, the merits whatever may have been discovered as it relates to those cases would not be individually admissible in evidence, or any of those details from those cases. However, as I said, the sheer number of cases may be relevant, i.e., to tend to prove or disprove a material fact as it relates to probable cause and malice.

(12/7/17 Tr. 5:1-23)4 (emphasis added).

SCAROLA: Will we be permitted to discuss the fact that Mr. had taken a leadership role in coordinating the prosecution of all of those claims, that is, that it was a — ils unified effort on the part of multiple law firms that Mr. was playing a thi le role, which then led to a basis to focus upon Mr. because of that leadership role?

THE COURT: If that's based on fact, then I believe it would be - you would be able to introduce that, yes.

(12/7/17 Tr. 6:3-14.)

AS

The Court memorialized these rulings in its January 16, 2018 e xhibit F.)

ARGUMENT / ..4k

A. Must List his Actual Trial Witnesses. Not Grandstand for the Press

designation of more than 169 wi \ Sihnecessary, excessive, abusive and deliberately misleading. Witness IS, ntionally broad and the subject of the witnesses' testimony so vague as to fo expend time and resources preparing for mini trials on a much broader scope th Court has already ruled it will allow. It reflects an abusive strategy seemingly cal la attract media attention, to cause Epstein to needlessly incur substantial costs, amuse his counsel to divert precious time and resources from trial preparation on th and issues in this case. Furthermore, identification of general ca f witnesses, such as "[slily additional individuals identified as victims" (No. 77) an ple on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail" (No. 153), rather than specific individual witnesses, forces Epstein into an impermissible trial by ambush, at least with respect to unnamed witnesses within these categories. It should not be allowed as Epstein is unable to make any preparations to address these witnesses' testimony and, where

Excerpts of the December 7, 2017, hearing transcript are attached as Exhibit E.

necessary, to challenge their credibility. This Court should order to identify the individual witnesses he actually intends to call to testify at trial, whether live or by deposition. The failure to do so would be highly prejudicial to Epstein and impede the efforts of Epstein's trial team in preparing for the central and relevant issues of this case.

This is not Epstein's first time seeking this relief; however, the Court has yet to hear argument or to rule on this issue. filed his first excessive Witness LiSTh4uly 2017. (D.E. 939.) In September 2017, Epstein filed his original Omnibus Moti c • i. ine which, in part, addressed the excessive number of witnesses. (D.E. 984.) In ato November 7, 2017, Supplemental Motion to Compel sought to compel AQ o disclose the specific subject matter each witness was going to testify about. t . .) Finally, on February 16, 2018, Epstein moved for a case management conf c Soy c e g the Court to determine, among other things, which witnesses would be cal e rsus through deposition. (D.E. 1206.) Although the trial was postponed in It the ellate stay, the Court now should address the abuses in Witness List, es prepare for trial on the new date to be set by this Court. Specifically, required to (1) identify the specific witnesses he will call for trial, including from th 'categories, and (2) specify the subject matter of their testimony.

Such a is w I within the Court's discretion and an appropriate exercise of its authority.. " question, the trial court has discretion to limit the number of witnesses which may y the parties[.]" Fogel v. Mirmelli, 413 So. 2d 1204, 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (citing Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So. 2d 659, 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) ("[P]laintiffs contend that the trial court improperly limited them to four 'before and after witnesses.' The record fails to demonstrate any prejudice or harmful error stemming from this exercise of judicial discretion in limiting the number of witnesses. The limiting of a number of witnesses for a given side has long

been recognized as appropriate.")). Indeed, under the circumstances, it is critical to ensure a fair and orderly trial "befitting of the known integrity of the history that has been pervasive in the 15th Judicial Circuit."

B. Should Not Be Allowed to Secure an Unfair Tactical Advantaae by Gaming the System

Now that it has been determined that it is onlyi sole cause of action malicious prosecution that is to be tried, should not be allowed to play "b1" a lull' in advance of the trial of his case. He has had ample time to prepare, and b knows specifically how he intends to present his case. He shoul he ore be compelled to identify which of his more than 169 listed witnesses he intends to call at trial and specifically what they will testify about. Because a ive number of witnesses on Witness List with no conceivable perso a ge of the issues which this Court has ruled it will allow to be presented at trial lo y, Epstein is unsure as to which witnesses is likely to call or the subs eir testimony, and therefore, Epstein is severely prejudiced in his trial preparat dtngly disclosing more than 169 witnesses, most of whom have no relevant testimo , s abusive and diverts precious time and resources from the preparation of trial rele an witnesses, particularly where has failed to provide any meaningful di ing the specific testimony to be elicited from his parade of witnesses. Rather th ng exclusively for the trial of the relevant issues of this case, Epstein will be forced to ulatc about and then challenge the irrelevant but highly and unduly prejudicial testimony of witnesses who may not even be called at trial. Epstein is also forced to prepare for "unknown" witnesses who fall within the general categories. should not be allowed to secure a tactical advantage over Epstein by gaming the system in this manner. e undoubtedly

designation of more than 169 witnesses and provision of overly vague descriptions of their potential trial testimony, if they testify at all, is the equivalent of nondisclosure leading to an impermissible trial by ambush. See Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. J.B. By & Through Spivak, 675 So. 2d 241, 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (citations omitted) ("[L]itigation should no[t] proceed as a game of blind man's bluff. Civil trials ary not to be ambushes for one side or the other."). See also Binger v. Pest Control, 40!(342d 1310, 1314 (Fla. 1981) (holding that compliance with pre-trial orders and directipg r, disclosure of witnesses eliminates surprise and prevents trial by ambush).

The Court has clearly insisted on a level playing field 4a ;:) at trial will not be used as a vehicle to try Epstein for his criminal charges or the to ' ' claims. Rather, is limited to presenting evidence about his malicious Stfc, tn action, his allegations that there was an absence of probable cause for Epstein t " d three clients' claims as they relate to those allegations in this case. 'le th Court has ruled that may speak only generally about the claims of othe a e did not represent, as to the number of claims and his role in those matters, is n permitted to go into detail about the merits of those claims. Many of the witnesses id r. on Witness List, however, can offer no testimony on these limited iss or th r testimony would be cumulative, unduly prejudicial and present a significant ri o ceeding the limited scope of inquiry allowed by this Court. Consequently, they stntllP Y be allowed to testify at the trial.

The ultimate control over ambiguous and misleading witness disclosures is within the broad discretion of the trial judge which "focuses on prejudice in the preparation and trial of a lawsuit." Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310, 1312 (Fla. 1981). Furthermore, section

90.612, Florida Statutes controls the "mode and order of interrogation and presentation" of witnesses and evidence and provides:

  • (1) The judge shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of the interrogation of witnesses and the presentation of evidence, so as to:
    • (a) Facilitate, through effective interrogation and presentation,
    • (b) Avoid needless consumption of time. the discovery of the truth.
    • (c) Protect witnesses from harassment or embarrassment.

(Emphasis added.)

Va 9(t l i This Court, therefore, has the power and, indeed, cilitate the orderly conduct of the trial of this case. In accordance with that pow i \ , this Court should order to specifically identify each witness he will a s \ lit as a witness at trial, whether live or by deposition, and to identify the subject m k of th ., testimony. This will both facilitate discovery of the truth, avoid needless was dic ources and avoid undue prejudice to Epstein.

C. Many of the Witness on Edwards' Current Witness List Do Not Have Personal Knowledge About the Malicious Prosecution Claim to be Tried and Any Testimony They Could Pros de Would Be Prejudicial

Only tho identified who have personal knowledge of the relevant issues in this eould be allowed to testify. Section 90.604, Florida Statutes provides:

xcept as otherwise provided in s. 90.702 [experts], a witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced which is sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may be given by the witness's own testimony.

§ 90.604, Fla. Stat. (emphasis added).

"Relevant evidence" is defined as evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact. § 90.401, Fla. Stat. As stated above, this Court has already determined the trial of this matter will befocused on the elements of the claim:

The risk of error, if we go beyond that intended limitation, is significant. And I want to make sure that we, again, are focused on the elements of the claim. An wh ther it be for compensatory damages associated with Mr. claim or punitive damages associated with Mr. claim, we are still dealing wi malicious prosecution claim, solely a malicious prosecution cl: •

(11/29/17 Tr. 98:17-99:1) (emphasis added). Thus, to be relevant to the ed in this case, the testimony must focus on the elements of a malicious pro claim.

In answers to Interrogatories, claimed that a cry single listed witness has knowledge pertaining to the malicious prosecution c absence of probable cause and malice. knows that this is simply un has listed at least 26 other tort claimants whom did no and their counsel, Landon a New York Times reporter (No. 29), Prince o. 48), Leslie Wexner (No. 78), President Donald Trump (No. 79), David Copper ), former President William J. Clinton (No. 116), Mark Epstein (No. 154), law enforce (i.e., Nos. 11, 12, 63, 69, 90, 102, 103, 104, 119, 120, 132), and many others. fact, of the 169 witnesses identified by do not have personal knowledge no present relevant evidence. t'tance,

der section 90.403, Florida Statutes, even "relevant evidence is inadmissible if its prob e value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentations of cumulative evidence." Any limited probative value that might argue his witnesses can provide is substantially outweighed by the prejudice to Epstein and their testimony should not be allowed.

In addition, litigation of purely collateral matters for the sole purpose of impeaching a party or witness is improper. Dempsey v. Shell Oil Co., 589 So. 2d 373, 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). A matter is considered collateral if it is not material and would not be admitted or any purpose other than the contradiction. Id. Thus, unless listed witnesses have personal knowledge of the matter at issue and can speak to what Epstein believed when he filed suit against the witnesses' testimony would be irrelevant and collateral, and thus, inadmissible urposes of impeachment.

Testimony of other tort claimants who never represe , mily members of tort claimants, counsel who represented other tort claiman co custodians of schools three clients attended, records custodians of r ctices three clients received medical treatment, law enforcement, loves ' its, t i otters, dignitaries, public officials, N Ac Epstein's associates and celebrities with w iv n has socialized can have no personal c r knowledge of facts relevant to the ele o dwards' malicious prosecution claim. Their testimony would only serve to r y prejudice Epstein and confuse the issues relevant to the elements of c 'm, ould be cumulative, and outside the scope of what this Court said it would allow r to maintain the level playing field and avoid reversible error of inquiry into mat nd this malicious prosecution action. Thus, none of the testimony of any of th esses should be allowed. In any event, should be compelled to designal l witness he actually intends to put on the stand and identify with specificity the subject matter which intends to elicit from each such designated witness, so that, before the witness is put on this stand, Epstein has an opportunity to challenge and this Court may determine whether the testimony will be irrelevant, compound, unduly prejudicial, or violate the limitations this Court has already imposed.

D. Should Not be Allowed to Try Other Cases at the Trial of This Matter

The Court has already found that the trial of this action will not be used to try any criminal case against Epstein or any of the prior civil actions against Epstein. Allegations in such other lawsuits against a defendant are not relevant and are highly prejudicial under section 90.403, Florida Statutes. See Long Term Care Found., Inc. v. 778 So. 2d 1100, 1102 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Likewise, "lilt is inconsistent with the notions of fair trial for th o force a defendant to resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which the def not on trial." v. Ad. Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714, 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 201 i omitted) (finding that "because the prior case was settled, none of the al 'co erein were proven"). Accordingly, witnesses who lack knowledge of facts or in ez i t : t ermane to the specific issues S" in this litigation should be precluded from testifyin C ict .

CONCI t,

t should not be allowed e we a 'rens out of this malicious prosecution trial and taint the jury with the spectacle of d y E judicial testimony. However, the excessively large number and wide array of indi esignated on his Witness List who have no connection to the relevant issues in thi learly demonstrate his intention to do just that. By designating more than 169 p ial wi esses without identifying which of them will actually testify at trial and specifics t t ey will testify about, is forcing Epstein into a game of blind man's bluff, y conducting an impermissible trial by ambush. The Court should not allow to employ these abusive tactics. It is highly prejudicial, if not nearly impossible, and a monumental waste of time and resources, to require Epstein to speculate blindly as to the testimony that might be given by all 169 witnesses, most of whom can have no personal knowledge regarding the relevant issues this Court has permitted to be addressed at trial, and complete the substantial

preparation required to effectively cross examine each of them regarding such testimony. should be ordered to identify specifically each witness whom he actually intends to call at the trial of this matter, whether the testimony will be live or by deposition testimony and the subject matter of the testimony, so as to ensure will not exceed the permissible scope of trial established by this Court. Moreover, should be prohibited from introducing any wi ess or any testimony outside of that scope. In addition, once properly identifies h esses and the specific subject matter of their intended testimony, Epstein requests t make further challenges, as appropriate.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC\$

I certify that the foregoing document has been Service List below on May 2, 2018, through the Court', Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). o the attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule of

h OCICENBACH, PA Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 alm Beach, Florida 33401 1) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: KaraWinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tinaglinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy(glinkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████ J. ██████

+
+

██████ J. ██████
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Bro ██████ Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
+██████ J. ██████

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

AS TRANSCRIPT O

?</14:4e r

DATE TAKEN: day, March 8th, 2018 TIME: p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

(..Se !rmillie

AwiN '...) , This cause came on to be heard at the time and ace aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by:

Cos

Elaine V. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

THE COURT: tWe'rfl(tl-Td)(51:7-cerri-E4- is (sustained) cp (nsN (sense)(that)(I) (rea flit) ac p) (1... .nf)(to, ) as (Indirado)(earlier, (roTiCi re)(to)() Opes)(--) can conduct)(the) proceedings Iffi) =4 ) (that)05-dare)(the) (known)(integrity not 051-mb the (attorneys (here) (5e-tore)C) (but) WM)(the)(history (UM)(has) pervasive) (th-O) (1's-an (Tu—dreiral)(Ctreifit). I don' t want this to dissolve into an ethical sion as to whether or not someone committe so e type of ethical violation. That's re not my focus today. And that focus is suited for others perhaps at a different d even perhaps in a different forum.

4 '1 Really wha as o be attempted to be divined today is so of representation by counsel for Mr. Epst what the source of these documents were.

ROCKENBACH: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Why were they preserved, how were ey preserved, for what reason were they preserved, did that preservation violate or come close to violating an order of the bankruptcy court, has the privilege been waived? And then we get back again to the Binger analysis.

I did a quick word search, and the Fifth

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800MaMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff, VS.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually,

Defendant,

Cos

SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST OF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J.

Counter-Plaintiff, J. ED ;llW and through his undersigned attorneys,

hereby supplements his list of witnesses trial follows:

WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED

  • 1. Bradley J. Ed 2.. Jeffrey E
  • 3. ep enson
    • W. Peachtree Street ta, Georgia 30339 do Erica Dubno 767 Third Avenue, Suite 3600 New York, New York 10017
  • 5. Guiffre do Stan Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800X.X.)OCMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 2 of 22

  • 6. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York 10016
  • 7. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. Mintz & Gold LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25'h Floor, New York, 10016
  • 8. 13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 800 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2449
  • 9. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, S • 00 Miami, FL 33131
  • 10. Robert C. Josef Podhurst Orsec One S.E. rd Avenu Suite 2700 Miami, FL
  • 11.
  • 112. ÷ Chief Michael Reiter Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Recarey ch Police Department outh County Road Beach, FL 33480
  • 13. JohuSapolly do & Schuster 1230 6th Avenue New York, New York 10020

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 3 of 22

14. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

15. do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

16. Antonio (Tony) Palm Coast, Florida

17. Records Custodian of Palm Beach Poli 345 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 S? 4V:rimy's Office

18. Records Custodian of Unit for the Southern District

19. Records Custodi eral Bureau of Investigations

20. Spencer Kuvin, 1800 S. A tmlian venue, #400 West Palm Florida 33409

+22. Rinaldo Rizzo do Robert 228 East 45th Street 1 17th Floor New York, NY 10017

21. re Leopold, Esquire Istein PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

23. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

lgrt009CA040800XXXXMBAG

DV. EPSTEIN

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M. IM

Page 4 of 22

  • 24. Isidro M. ME Esquire =Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401
  • 25. Earleen Cote, Esquire Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600 4. 41mc Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 O
  • 26. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. do Jack Scarola West Palm Beach, FL 33409 W s Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. /% 27. William Berger, Esquire Weiss, Handler, Comwell, P.A. 'Cl\I 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218 Boca Raton, FL 33431

C '

1C)

WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES

  • 28. Adrian Mucins 1040 South Sho Miami Beach, FL 33 141
  • 29. Land6h Thotyias York Times th Avenue York, NY 10018 ren Kramer do Boston Provident, L.P. 717 5th Avenue #12A New York, NY 10022
  • 31. LaVecchio !!!Unite !!tes Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida Broward Financial Center Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 5 of 22

32.

[REDACTED]

c/o Adam Horowitz.

Horowitz Law

425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

33.

Evgenia Ignatieva

1650 Broadway, #910

New York, NY 10019

34.

[REDACTED]

35.

[REDACTED]

c/o Adam Horowitz.

Horowitz Law

425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

36.

[REDACTED]

c/o Jack Scarola

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.

West Palm Beach, FL 33409

37.

[REDACTED]

c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.

Podhurst Orseck, PA

One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, FL 33131

38.

Brandy Brenson

c/o Spencer Kuvin

1800 South Australian Ave #400

West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

39.

[REDACTED]

c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.

Podhurst Orseck, PA

One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, FL 33131

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 6 of 22

40. do Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

41. William Scherer, Esquire 633 S Federal Hwy #800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

42. Paul Cassell, Esq. 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112 c 43. )

do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 ? 425 North Andrews Avenue, SKui

44.

45. do Ro C. Jose'berg, Esq. Podhurst PA One . . 3 venue, Suite 2700 Ivl • FL 3131

46. krkobert C. Josefsberg, Esq. odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3r° Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

47. ic olle.Pesberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

-ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 7 of 22

  • 48. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edwards Duke of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW1A 1 AA
  • 49. Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown
  • 50. do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131
  • 51. Lesley Groff do Mike 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036
  • 52. Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, F 934gt a mir St
  • 53.
  • 54. do Adam Horo Horowitz 425 North Fort --uderilale FL 33301 Avenue, Suite 2 obert C. Josefsberg, Esq. A711\ n urst Orseck, PA e S.E. rAvenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131
  • 55. Meagan Dorshel do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 8 of 22

56.

do Adam Horowitz. Horowitz Law 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

57.

do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3"I Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

58. Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480

59.

60.

61.

do Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131

do Robert C. Jo Podhurst Orsec One S.E. 3r Aven ,'Suite 2700 Miami, FL

paper Kuvin South Australian Ave #400 t Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

do Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suite 200 Miami, FL 33128

63. Jason Richards Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW r d AVE., Miami, FL 33169

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 9 of 22

64.

[REDACTED], Esq.
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

65.

[REDACTED], Esq.
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

66.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

67.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

68.

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

69.

Nezbitt Kurkendall
Federal Bureau of Investigation
16320 NW 2nd Ave.
Miami, FL 33169

70.

[REDACTED]
c/o Isidro M. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page IO of 22

71. Igor Zinoview Address Currently Unknown

72. Address Currently Unknown

73. 9 East 71 Street New York, NY 10021

74. Seth Lehrman 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

75. Matt Weissing 425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

76. Maria Villafana 500 S. Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 3

77. Any additional indj Office and who supplied as it re entified as victims by the United States Attorney's were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list the NPA.

78. Leslie W imit Parkway C us, Ohio 43206

Cos

79 dent Donald J. Trump Alan Garten, Esq. 5 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022

80. Larry Visoski 1131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33401

81. Mari tza Vasquez 1293 SW 215` Terrace Miami, FL 33145

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Page 11 of 22

  1. 82. Maximilia [REDACTED]
    c/o William Unroch, Esquire
    140 West End, Apt. 30-BW
    New York, NY 10023
  2. 83. [REDACTED]
    c/o Spencer Kuvin
    1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
  3. 84. [REDACTED]
    2915 Share Rd. 111
    Tallahassee, FL 31312
  4. 85. [REDACTED]
    c/o Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
    Podhurst Orseck, PA
    One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2700
    Miami, FL 33131
  5. 86. David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin)
    11675 Glowing Sunset Lane
    Las Vegas, NV 89135
  6. 87. [REDACTED]
  7. 88. Michael Fisten
    Weston, FL
  8. 89. Russell Adler
    Delray Beach, FL
  9. 90. [REDACTED] Alessi
    6791 Fairway Lakes Dr.
    Boynton Beach, FL 33472
  10. 91. Janusz Banasiak
    358 El Brillo Way
    Palm Beach, FL, 33480

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 12 of 22

92. Beata Banasiak 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL, 33480

93. Juan Alessi 6791 Fairway Lakes Dr. Boynton Beach, FL 33472

94. Michael 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253

95. Jerry Goldsmith 13285 Silver Fox Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33418-7942

96. Rosalie 53320 Avenida Madero La Quinta, CA 92253

97. Valdson Cotrin Address Currently

98.

99. , South Africa

nn Dubin 040 5th Ave. Unit 15A New York, NY 10028-0137

101. Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206

102. Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police Department 345 South County Road

J.

COSA

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 13 of 22

Palm Beach, FL 33480

103. Officer Minot
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

104. Sgt. Sorge
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

105. [REDACTED]
Address Currently Unknown

106. [REDACTED] Pagnano
1217 S Flagler Drive, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

107. Stephan Kosslyn
28 Garfield Street
Cambridge, [REDACTED] 02138-1802

108. Cecile Dejongh
23 S Estate Mafolie
St. [REDACTED] VI 00802

109. Tommy Mottola
302 Caribbean Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480-3012

110. Mike Sanka
449 S Beverly Drive, Suite 101
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

111. [REDACTED]

112. William "Bill" [REDACTED]
5645 Coral Ridge Drive # 391
Coral Springs, FL 33076

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff

Page 14 of 22

  1. 113. Howard Rubenstein
    1345 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, NY 10105
  2. 114. Robert Meister
    101 Seminole Ave.
    Palm Beach, FL 33480
  3. 115. Todd Meister
    101 Seminole Ave
    Palm Beach, FL 33480
  4. 116. President William J. Clinton
  5. 117. William Hammond
    2965 Fontana Place
    [REDACTED] Palm Beach, FL
  6. 118. Robert Roxburgh
    5600 North Flagler Dr, #250
    West Palm Beach, Florida
  7. 119. Michele Pagan
    Palm Beach Police Department
    345 South County Road
    Palm Beach, FL 33480
  8. 120. Michele Dawson
    Palm Beach Police Department
    345 South County Road
    Palm Beach, FL 33480
  9. 121. Amy Fortimer
    12309 North Old Country Road
    Wellington, FL 33414
  10. 122. [REDACTED]

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 15 of 22

123. [REDACTED]

124. [REDACTED]

125. [REDACTED]

126. Latasha Lowe
c/o Adam Horowitz.
Horowitz Law
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301

127. [REDACTED]

128. Zack Bryan
1150 Larch Way
Wellington, Florida

129. [REDACTED]

130. Larry Morrison
11148 Cobblefield Dr..
Wellington, FL 33449

131. Story Cowles
801 S Olive Ave., Unit 201S
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

132. Michael Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff J.

Page 16 of 22

  • 133. Salaam Kahlid Monroe 119 Menores Ave., Apt. 3 Coral Gables, FL 33134
  • 134. Jelitza Negrette 503 Chandlers Warf Portland, ME 04101
  • 135. Sergia Cordero 825 Brickell Bay Drive, #1141 Miami, FL 33131
  • 136. Cassandra Rivera 5011 El Clain Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33415
  • 137. Randee Speciale Palm Beach Victim Services 205 North Dixie Highway, # West Palm Beach, FL 3
  • 138.
  • 139. Steven H. enberg Address C q, Unknown
  • 140. Mi6110eI Stroll urrently Unknown
  • 141. glas Shoettle 43 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025
  • 142. Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown
  • 143. Amazon Records Custodian
  • 144. Yellow Cab Records Custodian

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 17 of 22

  1. 145. Citrix Systems, Inc. Records Custodian
  2. 146. Federal Bureau of Investigation Records Custodian
  3. 147. Milton Girls Juvenile Facility Records Custodian
    5770 East Milton Road
    Milton, FL
  4. 148. School District of Palm Beach County Records Custodian
    3344 Forest [REDACTED] Blvd., Suite C-124
    West Palm Beach, FL 33406
  5. 149. St. Mary's Medical Center Records Custodian
    901 45th Street
    West Palm Beach, FL 33401
  6. 150. Wellington Reginal Hospital Records Custodian
    10104 Forrest [REDACTED] Blvd.
    Wellington, FL 33414
  7. 151. All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff.
  8. 152. All rebuttal witnesses.
  9. 153. All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail.

WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED
BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION

154. Mark Epstein
30 Vandam Street
New York, NY 10013

155. [REDACTED]
c/o Alan S. Ross, Esq.

156. [REDACTED]

157. Alfredo Rodriguez

do Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons

11349 SW 86TH Lane

Miami, FL

  • 158. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

  • 159. Jeffrey Epstein

  • 160. Horowitz Law do Adam Horo witz. 425 Noth Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 \ Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 EXPER"SSSES

  • 161. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D do Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Sc art & Shipley 2139 Palm Beac lvd. West Palm Beac 3409

CO

The followin witn are attorneys that are not retained or specially employed to provide expert to ny, b t may provide opinions relating to the propriety of Brad Edward's conduct of di t he prosecution of the Epstein claims.

162.N scert C. Josefsberg, Esquire odhurst Orseck, PA One S.E. rd Avenue, Suite 2700 Miami, FL 33131

  • 163. Charles Lichtman, Esquire Berger Singerman 300 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

  • 167. Isidro M. Esquire Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datum Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, 33401
  • 168. Earleen Cote, Esquire S ue 1600 Kubicki Draper One East Broward Boul Fort Lauderdale, FL
  • 169. William Berger, Weiss, Handler, I, P.A. 2255 Gla Road, uite 218A Boca Rato 33431
  • 164. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
  • 165. Theodore Leopold, Esquire Milstein 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 A(Iptc Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
  • 166. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 "S C)

Plaintiff reserves 44 ght / to amend this list.

l ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff M.

Page 19 of 22

O '

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Page 20 of 22

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this GPR day of November, 2017.

JACK SCAROLA

Florida Bar No.: 169440

Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mep@searcylaw.com

Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.

2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard

West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

Phone: (561) 686-6300

Fax: (561) 383-9451

Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff

Page 21 of 22

COUNSEL LIST

Jack Scarola, Esquire
scarolateam@searcylaw.com;
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Scott J. Link, Esq.
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: 561-727-3600
Fax: 561-727-3601
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-655-4777
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

ADV. EPSTEIN

Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Seventh Amended and Supplemental Witness List of Counterplaintiff J.

Page 22 of 22

J. M, Esquire

staff efile@pathtojusticomn

Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)-524-2820

Fax: (954)-524-2822 A"\' CO 'S Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein I.S 5) ? ' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Attorneys for Scott Rothstein C

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire

tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com

Tonja Haddad, P.A.

315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301

Fax: (954)-337-3716

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)467-1223

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire

marc@nuriklaw.com

One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700

Phone: (954)-745-5849

Fax: (954)-745-3556

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DE NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS% OGATORIES JEFFREY EPSTE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

J. individually, and L.M., individually,

Defendant(s).

A

Goes

J. by and through ( 4c s gned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories wit Co propounded by the Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, on July 12, 2017, which ished to the attorneys for the Counter-Defendant.

I HEREBY CERTIFY to all Counsel on the and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve

Ath, 2017.

JACK COLA Flori No.: 169440 Att E-Mail(s): jsx®searcvlaw.com; and @searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam©searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-31iiiii Attorneys for J.

1

[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories

COUNSEL LIST

William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-655-4777
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954)-524-2820

Fred Haddad, Esquire
Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com
Fred Haddad, P.A.
One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
Phone: (954)-467-6767
Fax: (954)-467-3599
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire
tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Tonja Haddad, P.A.
315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954)-467-1223
Fax: (954)-337-3716
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein

Co SA iS)/49

INTERROGATORIES

As to every individual identified on your List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following:

1. The proper name, address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or others ciWontact for each witness:

ANSWER: CO

DESCRIPTION SSES
1 Jeffrey Epstein
2-3 (Expected to refuse to testify onc e t of the claim for Malicious Prosecution). Consistent
2formerly Kelle
2-3 Expected ttestify a ut each element of malicious prosecution except bonafide termination and
damages. Will tthe truth of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood
that the divery nducted by would have resulted in re evant information to proving aspects
of thesexual abuse cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the issue of
punes) Subject to assertions of privilege
3.inkova
cl ubno
2-3 Expected to testify about each element of malicious prosecution except bonafide
termination and damages.Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by
against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would
ave resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexuaabuse
cases being prosecuted by I=at the time, including on the issue of punitive
dams es)Sub 'ect to assertions of privilege
4. do Stan Pottingei

DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES

49 Twin Lakes Road, Suite 100 South Salem NY 10590

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of 'robable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the va ous sexua abuse cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the e of punitive dama es through her own knowl ge and experiences with Epstei

. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. O MINTZ & GOLD LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floor, New York 10016

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted byI-Awards against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have re t in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cages being prosecu y s at the time, including on the issue of punitive dame :es throu h her own knowledge an s with Epstein.

6. do Peter Guirguis, Esq. MINTZ & GOLD LLP 600 Third Avenue, 25th Floo New York, 10016

2-3 Expected to testi abo t the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery co u tied by would have It in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexua cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the issue of punitive dama le u own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

• Av.1 6. Nadi or 13 1 de Drive, Suite 800 an aks, CA 91423-2449

-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and slice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by at the time, including on the issue of punitive dame es throw her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

8. do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA, 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800, MIAMI, FL 33131

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through her own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

+
9. +

Robert Josefsberg, Esquire
PODHURST ORSECK, PA,
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800,
MIAMI, FL 33131

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by Edwards against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by Edwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will confirm the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

+
10. +

Detective [REDACTED] Recarey
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.

+
11. +

Chief Michael Reiter
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.

+
12. +

John Connolly
c/o [REDACTED] & Schuster
1230 6th Avenue
New York, New York 10020

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of

+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.
13.Charles Lichtman, Esquire
350 East Las Olas Boulevard | Suite 1000
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify as to the falsity of the claims made by Epstein against Edwards and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.
14.William Scherer, Esquire
633 S Federal Hwy #800
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify as to the falsity of the claims made by Epstein against [REDACTED]
15.Antonio [REDACTED] (Tony)
Palm Coast, Florida

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through his own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.
16.Records Custodian of Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480
17.Records Custodian of United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
18.Records Custodian of the Federal Bureau of Investigations
19.Spencer Kuvin, Esquire
1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.
20.Theodore Leopold, Esquire
2925 PGA Boulevard
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED]' actions.

+
21. +

Rinaldo Rizzo
c/o Robert [REDACTED]
228 East 45th Street | 17th Floor
New York, NY 10017

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by Edwards against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by Edwards at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages through his own knowledge and experiences with Epstein.

+
22. +

Adam Horowitz, Esquire
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED]' actions.

+
23. +

Isidro M. [REDACTED], Esquire
[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED]' actions.

+
24. +

All of the Lawyers who Represented Victims of Jeffrey Epstein.

+

2-3 Expected to testify about the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. Will testify to the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, the likelihood that the discovery conducted by [REDACTED] would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of

+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
punitive damages. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.
WITNESSES WHICH MAY BE CALLED IF NEED ARISES
2-3. Each of the witnesses listed below as numbered 25-157 (with the exception of records custodians) has information pertaining to the malicious prosecution elements of absence of probable cause and malice. If called, each could provide information regarding the truth of the claims prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein, and the likelihood that the discovery conducted by Edwards would have resulted in relevant information to proving aspects of the various sexual abuse cases being prosecuted by [REDACTED] at the time, including on the issue of punitive damages.
25.[REDACTED]
1040 South Shore Drive
Miami Beach, FL 33141
26.Landon [REDACTED]
c/o New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
27.Oren Kramer
c/o Boston Provident, L.P.
717 5th Avenue #12A
New York, NY 10022
28.[REDACTED] LaVecchio
United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida
Broward Financial Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.
29.[REDACTED]
c/o Brad Edwards, [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing
425 North Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale FL 33301
30.Evgenia Ignatieva
1650 Broadway, #910
New York, NY 10019
31.Anouska [REDACTED]
536 N. Edinburgh Avenue,
Los Angeles, CA 90048
32.Angelique [REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
33.[REDACTED]
c/o Jack Scarola
SEARCY DENNEY, ET AL.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
34.[REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131
35.Brandy Brenson c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
36.[REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131
37.[REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 South Australian Ave #400
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
38.[REDACTED]
c/o [REDACTED] Esq.
[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
39.Paul Cassell, Esq.
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City Utah, UT 84112
40.[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
41.Teala Davies
1212 N. Clark Street
West Hollywood, CA 90069
42.Felicia [REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131
43.[REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES MIAMI FL 33131
'do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131
45.Prince Andrew Albert Christian of York, Buckingham Palace Road London SW I A IAA
46.Frederic Fekkai Address Currently Unknown do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. C.) PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131
48.Lesley Groff do Mike
'S 5) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036
49.Dave Rogers do Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 West Palm Beach FL 33
50.do Adam Horowitz
JAFFE, W G, ET AL.
FT. N ANDRE AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERD L 33301
51.Leigh Sk atr
do Ro sefsberg, Esq.
POCA S RSECIC, PA .,\_.T.GLER STREET, STE 800 IM:11.., 33131
52.eagan Dorshel Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131
ac irn Horowitz JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL. 33301
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
54.c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131
55.Tod Meister 101 Seminole Avenue Palm Beach, FL 38480
56.Rhiannon Schwcgel
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. 6) PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131
57.do Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA, 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI FL 33131
58.c/o Spencer Kuvin 1800 South Australian Ave #400 West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
59.c/o Marshall Dore Louis 40 NW third Street, Suit Miami, FL 33128
60.Jason Richards
Federal Bureau Investigation
16320 NW 2nd A , IAM1, FL 33169
61.Shawns ra
c/o Bra e dwards, Esq.
F fit lo , J FE, WEISSING, ET AL TREWS AVE., SUITE 2,
F . r ERDALE, FL 33301 JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL
63.c/ larn Horowitz JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
64. +

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

+
65. +

[REDACTED]
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

+
66. +

Nezbitt Kurkendall
Federal Bureau of Investigation
16320 NW 2nd AVE.
MIAMI, FL 33169

+
67. +

[REDACTED]
c/o Isidro M. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL, 33401

+
68. +

Igor Zinoview
Address Creently Unknown

+
69.[REDACTED]
Address Currently Unknown +
70. +

[REDACTED]
9 East 71 Street
New York, NY 10021

+
71. +

Seth Lehrman
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

+
72. +

Matt Weissing
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

+
73. +

Maria Villafana
500 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Will also confirm the leadership role played by [REDACTED] in the prosecution of civil claims against Epstein and the propriety of [REDACTED] actions.

+
74. +

Any additional individuals identified as victims by the United states Attorney's Office and whose identities were conveyed to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a list supplied as it related to the NPA

+
75. +

Leslie Wexner
Three Limited Parkway
Columbus, Ohio 43206. Subject to assertions of privilege

+
76. +

Donald Trump
c/o Alan Garten, Esq.
725 Fifth Avenue

+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
New York, NY 10022. Subject to the assertions of privilege
77.Larry Visoski
1131 PINE POINT ROAD
RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33401
78.Maritza Vasquez
1293 SW 21st Terrace
Miami, FL 33145
79.Maximilia [REDACTED]
C/O ATTORNEY WILLIAM UNROCH
140 WEST END, APT 30-BW
NEW YORK, NY 10023
80.[REDACTED]
c/o Spencer Kuvin
1800 S. Australian Avenue, #400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
81.[REDACTED]
2915 SHARE RD 111
TALLAHASSEE, FL 31312
82.[REDACTED]
c/o Robert Josefsberg, Esq.
PODHURST ORSECK, PA
25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800
MIAMI, FL 33131
83.David Copperfield (David Seth Kokin)
11675 GLOWING SUNSET LN
LAS VEGAS, NV 89135
84.[REDACTED]
12247 72ND CT N
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412
85.Michael Fisten
Weston, FL
86.Russell Adler
Delray Beach, FL
87.Marie Alessi
6791 FAIRWAY LAKES DR.
BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472
88.Janusz Banasiak
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH FL, 33480
89.Beata Banasiak
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, FL 33480
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
90.Juan Alessi 6791 FAIRWAY LAKES DR. BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472
91.Michael 53320 AVENIDA MADERO LA QUINTA CA 92253
92.Jerry Goldsmith 13285 SILVER FOX LN WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33418-7942
93.Rosalie 53320 AVENIDA MADERO LA QUINTA CA 92253 CO Valdson Cotrin Address Currently Unknown 301 E 66TH ST APT IIP NEW YORK, NY 10065
'<l 4)'C )
96.Cecelia Unknown South Africa
97.Glenn = 1040 5TH AVE UNIT I5A
NEW YORK, NY 10028-013 7 , r
98.Abigail Wexner Three Limited Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43206(
99.Officer Munyan Palm Beach Police DeNanient 345 South Coutillikd
Palm Beach, FL 4
100.Officer of
Palm c lice Department
34 C unty Road
1 , FL 33480 orge 1m Beach Police Department 3 5 South County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 102. 1.IIIII2
103.Arnold Paul Prospari 215 WESTMINSTER RD WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405-1654
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
104.Pagnano
FLAGLER DR STE 301
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
105.Stephan Kosslyn
28 GARFIELD ST
CAMBRIDGE 02138-1802
106.Cecile Dejongh
23 8 ESTATE MAFOLIE
ST VI 00802
107.Tommy Mottola
302 CARIBBEAN RD
PALM BEACH FL 33480-3012
108.Mike Sanka
449 S BEVERLY DR
STE 101
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212
109.[REDACTED]
Witness #105
110.William "Bill" [REDACTED]
5645 CORAL RIDGE DR # 391
CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076
111.Howard Rubenstein
1345 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10105
112.Robert Meister
101 SEMINOLE AVE
PALM BEACH FL 33480
113.Todd Meister
101 SEMINOLE AVE
PALM BEACH, FL 33480
114.President William J. Clinton
115.William Hammond
2965 Fontana Place
Royal Palm Beach, FL
116.Robert Roxburgh
5600 North Flagler Dr, #250
West Palm Beach, Florida
117.Michele Pagan
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
118.Michele Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480
119.Amy Fortimer
12309 N OLD COUNTRY RD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414
120.[REDACTED]
345 South EAST APT 6E
NEW YORK, NY 10009
121.[REDACTED]
371 NW TRESCO WAY APT 208
JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957
122.[REDACTED]
5157 Kingston Court,
West Palm Beach, Florida
123.[REDACTED]
FINITED
MIAMI FL 33133-2607
124.Latasha Lowe
c/o Adam Horowitz
[REDACTED], JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL.
425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
125.[REDACTED]
115 Sunsunne Blvd
West Palm Beach, Florida
126.Zack Bryan
1150 Larch Way
Wellington, Florida
127.Zinta Braukis
925 W AVENUE 37
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065-3241
128.Larry Morrison
11148 COBBLEFIELD DR.
WELLINGTON, FL 33449
129.Story Cowles
801 S OLIVE AVE UNIT 201S
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
130.Alan Dershowitz
26 RESERVOIR ST
CAMBRIDGE, [REDACTED] 02138
or
TUDOR CITY PL
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
APT 7K
NEW YORK, NY 10017. Subject to assertions of privilege
131.Michael Dawson
Palm Beach Police Department
345 South County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480
132.Salaam Kahlid Monroe
119 MENORES AVE APT 3
CORAL GABLES, FL 33134
133.Jelitza Negrette
503 CHANDLERS WARF
PORTLAND, ME 04101
134.Sergia [REDACTED]
825 BRICKELL BAY DR., #1141
MIAMI, FL 33131
135.Cassandra [REDACTED]
5011 EL CLARK CIRCLE
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415
136.Randee Speciale
PALM BEACH VICTIM SERVICES
205 N DIXIE HIGHWAY # 5.1100
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
137.[REDACTED]
Address Currently Unknown
138.Steven Hoffenberg
Address Currently Unknown
139.Michael Stroll
Address Currently Unknown
140.Douglas Shoettle
243 Riverside, Dr.
New York, NY 10025
141.Ghislaine Maxwell
Address Currently Unknown
142.Records Custodian
Amazon
143.Records Custodian
Yellow Cab
144.Records Custodian
Citrix Systems, Inc.
145.Records Custodian
Federal Bureau of Investigation
146.Records Custodian
Milton Girls Juvenile Facility
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES
5770 EAST MILTON ROAD
MILTON, FL
147.Records Custodian
School District of Palm Beach County
3344 FOREST ██████ BLVD, SUITE C-124
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
148.Records Custodian
St. Mary's Medical Center
901 45th STREET
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
149.Records Custodian
WELLINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL
10104 FORREST ██████ BLVD
WELLINGTON, FL 33414
150.All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff, Jane Doe.
151.All rebuttal witnesses.
152.All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail.
WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION
153.Mark Epstein
30 VANDAM STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10013
154.██████ (Adriana Mucinska)
St. Mary's Medical Center, Esq.
155.Louella Rabuyo
358 EL BRILLO WAY
PALM BEACH, FL 33480
156.Alfredo Rodriguez
11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL
C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons
157.Scott Rothstein
c/o Mark Nurik
One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

2. Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by the witness, including identifying with particularity as to which element(s) of your claim for MaliciousProsecution this witness's testimony is applicable:

ANSWER: See response to number 1.

3. A detailed description of the testimony expected to be presented at tr contested factual issue and element of your claim against Epstein: tness as to each

ANSWER: See response to number 1.

4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List numb., ,,"lip s,, Gexhibit Cexpected to be introduced into evidence by the witness:

ANSWER: Unknown at this time w )(bib will be introduced through which witness.

5. A description of the Trial about which the witness s expec testimony regarding each t: ist number of each exhibit introduced through other means to testify, together with a description of thewitness' expected

ANSWER: U n at Ibis time the exhibits about which each witness will testify.

STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Broward

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11th day of
August, 2017 by Brad Edwards, who is personally known
to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did
not take an oath.

X [Signature]

(SEAL)

[Signature]
(Notary signature)

Maria Kellichian

(Notary name - print)
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florida

EXHIBIT D

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

L

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, CO S

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS

DATE TAKEN: ay, November 29th, 2017

TIME: a.m. - 3:55 p.m.

PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C

t Palm Beach, Florida

BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge

This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept)

Sonja D.

Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

question, MR. SCAROLA 4c1,7S on't recall that last but ih rstand the Court's -- I understand Court's concern.

Court is concerned the case that -- strike that.

The question and answer that was just provided would be admissible. What we're talking about, Mr. Scarola, are questions that were cited in the motion and that the court has chosen not to read, that are of aC graphic, sexual nature, and have, to my recollection, a general form of ques as opposed to specifics: Have yo certain things to minors? A so things of that natu 4(c been with prostitutes? u done ever ever --

COURT: Ms. Rockenbach's question.

(Again, I know you understand it, but I) to make sure that the record is clear,) -7\ta nd that's this.) (I have an obligation, as) (both sides are well aware, to ensure that we) (are working on a level playing field to the) (extent that it is possible.)

(I have the obligation, as)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(gatekeeper of evidence and to ensure to the) (best of my ability that we are not going to) (be eng2ging in pejorative name-calling types) (of questioning, nor are we going to get into) (inflammatory types of guestioning\_just for) (the sole purpose of information).

Now, I know you wouldn't do that. at the same time, as advocates, your respective positions have to be clea favor of your respective clien

However, as I said ear really becomes an issue of dri specifics before I actual questions are being sought to be introduced. gown into the rulings on the

So the al aspect of the Court's decisiov this time, until I look at the 1 questions, is essentially this. And, r is, that I'm going to permit -- and e've already gotten a stipulation on the record by Mr. Epstein's counsel, which I appreciate -- that is, he's not going to be receding from his Fifth Amendment invocations. He's not going to be changing his testimony, so as to necessitate further

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

discovery as it relates to his testimonial evidence that has already been presented.

Therefore, those questions that deal with, for example, the question that you asked and answered, would be admissible.

Those, because of the reasons that I stated earlier, would seem to make common sense O decisions of the court's, whether in Flo ida or outside of Florida -- the v jority being outside of the state from the federal courts -- and, that the Fifth Amendment canrlbused to take away me and seems Mr. prove the pr ab to prove his case or ause element. to be the thrust of the

So to the extent that it would be (needed to go in front of the jury, any) buestions that deal with the issue of) Eostein's lawsuits brought by)

on behalf of the respective) Clients, would be germane.) (And any) invocation, such as what was illustrated) (here, would be germane and relevant and) found to be admissible. (ruling of the Court.) That's the core

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Now, when it comes to issues of general)

(graphic questioning, such as what has been)

(exemplified by way of the

counter-defendant's motion, those will not

(be permitted.

A

The closer question, and the one that I perspective of the need to drill down further, is one of - because the complaint -- and I apprecia ) the fact that you brought this with C ou today and provided it to me -- eca se the complaint delineates the na allegations -- at least summary aims -- how much the are we going to ble to introduce, if those questi e asked? I haven't memorized t position testimony.

There at least two depositions, if of mistaken.

S:) 4 MS. ROCRENBACH: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Two depositions. I haven't memorized that testimony.

But since the complaint -- let me cite to you exactly where we are -- where I am alluding to here. Page 18 and it states, "Rothstein and the litigation team knew or

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

specifically on this aspect of the case, because one of the things that the defense is attempting to exclude is any reference to anything other than L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases.

(Your Honor suggested -- and I thought) (that I heard you correctl -- that evidenc (with regard to other claims actuall (against Epstein would be relevant an material. And clearly it is. ed

THE COURT: (I believe id was) (those cases filed by Mr • aids or any) Elaims that were st Epstein by\_A) Llient represent . Edwards).

Tell me 6 (\_ypG think that the aggregate c e knot having anything to do with Mr ards' representation or tein firm's representation -- because Berger, I think, was involved in some espects as well.

MR. SCAROLA: Co-counsel.

THE COURT: Solely as co-counsel -- I believe that to be the case -- are you suggesting that the aggregate cases would be relevant?

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

with regard to other child molestations in any child molestation claim.

(THE COURTi) for a minute. So let's talk about that Because again, what I don't want this to turn into is a case testing (whether or not Epstein was an alleged serial child molester. (pass muster legally, and I don't want t (this case twice.

(I think that we should be v ti ely) (circumspect when it deals e are) (dealing with global iss olestation of) (gaphic descri tion f t es of alleged molestation exc re we are dealin•) (with claims e been brought on behalf) (of those re a nted by Mr.

k of error, if we go beyond that) significant.) f ocused on the elements of the claim.) to make sure that we, again, are) (And I (whether it be for compensatory damages (punitive damages associated with Mr. claim, we are still dealing) (with a malicious prosecution claim, solely

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(malicious prosecution claim.)

And so to deviate from that direction)

(would be precarious and concerning to the)

Court, in particular, because when we're

(dealing with issue of robable cause, we're)

(focusing on -- as I've made clear -- not)

(only Mr. Epstein's stated intent, but I)

(fully intend to allow circumstantial) k","

(evidence, inclusive of the invocation of; the)

(Fifth Amendment relevant questions

(pertaining to the plaintiff'Sit the)

(counter-plaintiff's, mor

Mr. position to explain to the jury)

awl -- or to the Court -- why Mr. Epstein)

(brought this claim; what were the true)

(motivating factors concerning same.)

To'Allow this to intrude into

allegations of serial molestation is

da erous and is concerning]

(You may proceed.)

MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, Your Honor. I

acknowledge the legitimacy of the Court's

concern. And I recognize the fact that the

Court, appropriately, under Rule 403, must

balance probative value against prejudice.

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

publicize and to sensationalize the circumstances so as to increase the value of at least the claims that were held by the Rothstein firm.

MR. SCAROLA: Which I think is what every lawyer is supposed to do within the bounds of propriety, obviously. But our j is to maximize the value of our clients filS" 0 claims.

C.)

THE COURT: And on the of de of the coin is Mr. t k' position that the impetus -- or us for filing the complaint at ba a exposure of Mr. Epstein, onc to the ignominy of having to fa ublicity of a non-prosecu r 1 agreement where there were admissi where there were agreements ps not admissions -- but agreements limited the prosecution of him as it elates to multiple claimants or multiple potential victims.

(So again, my ruling on that is if there) (are questions that have to do with this) (issue, globally they will be allowed to be) (asked subject to further argument as it)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

(relates to the multiplicity of the numerous) (victims that we are dealing with here as) alle ed.

Same as it goes with this 234-page federal complaint. If there were any questions that were asked of Mr. Epstein where he refused to answer on Fifth AS AP' Amendment grounds, I find that the (: 941 v information would be relevant. Ther for , his failure to answer would be uld be able to be utilized if such ons were asked of him regarding t page federal complaint filed on l ia L.M. by Mr.

MR. S point, and is, we have been focusing on questio at have already been asked of pstein. Obviously, we have the right all Mr. Epstein as an adverse witness. have the right to put him in that witness chair in front of the jury and to ask him questions that Your Honor has considered to be appropriate that may not have been asked at the time of his deposition. : 1Let me just clarify one

÷e

EXHIBIT E

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
+ FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN
+ AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
+ ██████████, individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

DATE TAKEN: Thursday, December 7th, 2017
+ TIME: 10:01 a.m. - 12:57 p.m.
+ PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11B
+ West Palm Beach, Florida
+ BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by:

Sonja D. ██████████
+ Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc.
+ 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+ (561) 471-2995

obviously, what may or may not be asked of2Mr. ( [REDACTED] and Mr. Epstein principally on3these cases or these issues, the global4order of the Court would be that those5individual claims would not be subject to6discussion as to the merits, as Mr. Scarola7has stipulated.8However, as it relates to both probable9cause, i.e., motive and malice, the number10of claims that is, speaking in terms of11volume that Mr. Epstein was facing at the12time that he brought the suit and continued13the prosecution of that suit would be14relevant. So that's the distinction being15drawn by the Court, the detail, the merits,16whatever may have been discovered as it17relates to those cases would not be18individually admissible in evidence, or any19of those details from those cases.20However, as I said, the sheer number of21cases may be relevant, i.e., to tend to22prove or disprove a material fact as it23relates to probable cause and malice. So24that's the decision.25Next issue, please.

1 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. May I also
+ 2 ask for this clarification, Your Honor?

3 (will) we be permitted to discuss the

4 (fact) that MR. ([REDACTED]) had taken a Leadership

5 role in coordinating the prosecution of all

6 of those claims, that is, that it was a (--)

7 it was a unified effort on the part of

8 multiple law firms that MR. ([REDACTED]) was

9 playing a Leadership role, which then led to

10 a basis to focus upon MR. Edwards because of

11 that leadership role?

12 THE COURT: If that's based on fact,

13 then I believe it would be (--) you would be

14 able to introduce that, yes.

15 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir.

16 THE COURT: Because, again, it tends to
+ 17 prove or disprove a material fact, i.e.,
+ 18 probable cause, motive, malice.

19 Again, whether or not the jury accepts
+ 20 that -- it's going to be up to the jury to
+ 21 accept it, reject it, give it the weight it
+ 22 deserves, or to infer anything that they
+ 23 reasonably believe would be inferrible as a
+ 24 result of that information.

25 The next issue, please.

EXHIBIT F

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT RTirigividually, and J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. (7)

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN1A FREY EPSTEIN'S REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN !AMINE S (REFERENCES TO CASES NOT LITIGATED BY

THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on December 7, 2017, upon Section D of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") seeking to exclude references to any cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted / by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. a"). [D.E. 1070.] The Court, having reviewed the Motion and Response [D.E. 1089], having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties may speak generally about the number of claims -that Epstein was facing at the time he initiated, and during his continuance, of this proceeding against . The details, the merits and what may have been discovered in cases against Epstein which were not prosecuted by will not be admissible into evidence, subject to the Court's reconsideration at trial as the evidence is presented. (12/7/17 Tr. 4:25-5:24.) however, will be permitted to discuss generally, without testifying about any specific

case or claim, his leadership role in coordinating the prosecution of all of the claims. (12/7/17 Tr.

6:1-24.)

DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach rida this /.' day of January, 2018.

THE HONORAB ONAL W. HAFELE CIRCUIT COUR JUDGE

Copies provided to:

SERVICE LIST c

Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 merasearcvlaw.comNialkp'Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs(aFLAnnellateLaw.com , isx0/searcvlaw.com'
scarolateamesearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counier-Plaintiffkbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Pottingcr LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad(TheplIc.comCo- ounsel r De endant/Cozmter-Plaintiff J. Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marce,nuriklaw.com
staffefile@Dathtoiustice.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintifir J.Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Angela@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
Eservice@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

NOTA CERTIFIED

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79f7f9529f77e1cbb3e91cb0e12483b8746b89fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/EFTA02767004.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3559 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 84, + "chars": 122979, + "elapsed_seconds": 31.4, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_64_Picture_16.jpeg", + "_page_64_Picture_17.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF E EPSTEIN'S \nMOTION TO COMPEL COUNTIFJI-PIS NTIFF \nBRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO !DENT HIS TRIAL WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 483.58929443359375, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 483.58929443359375, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN'I' ROD UCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 356.1105041503906, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 356.1105041503906, + 464.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 464.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS LISTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 389.5182189941406, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 389.5182189941406, + 86.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 86.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULINGS OF THIS COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 385.57000732421875, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 385.57000732421875, + 515.60302734375 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 515.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT / ..4k", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 400.5572509765625, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 400.5572509765625, + 307.10302734375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 307.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Must List his Actual Trial Witnesses. Not Grandstand for the Press", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 504.7605895996094, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 504.7605895996094, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Should Not Be Allowed to Secure an Unfair Tactical Advantaae by Gaming \nthe System", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 544.2833862304688, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 544.2833862304688, + 182.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 182.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Many of the Witness on Edwards' Current Witness List Do Not Have Personal \nKnowledge About the Malicious Prosecution Claim to be Tried and Any Testimony \nThey Could Pros de Would Be Prejudicial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Should Not be Allowed to Try Other Cases at the Trial of This Matter", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 517.801025390625, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 517.801025390625, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCI \nt,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 331.70400000000006, + 390.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 390.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC$", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 389.4442138671875, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 389.4442138671875, + 307.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 307.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS TRANSCRIPT O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 402.5552062988281 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 402.5552062988281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEVENTH AMENDED AND SUPPL WITNESS LIST \nOF COUNTER-PLAINTIFF J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 480.4582824707031, + 363.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 363.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS ED TO BE PRESENTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 430.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 436.352783203125, + 446.60302734375 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 446.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESSES WHI CALLED IF THE NEED ARISES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.26422119140625, + 439.4730224609375 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 439.4730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENTED BY MEANS OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 503.01 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 531.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 367.2, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 390.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOUNDED BY COUNTER-DE \nNOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS% OGATORIES\nJEFFREY EPSTE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 479.196, + 368.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 368.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25537109375, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25537109375, + 127.863037109375 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 127.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.58, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 284.58, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 364.5288391113281, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 364.5288391113281, + 169.85302734375 + ], + [ + 247.24800000000005, + 169.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER: CO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.112, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 433.86285400390625, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 433.86285400390625, + 280.85302734375 + ], + [ + 77.112, + 280.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 437.25775146484375, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 437.25775146484375, + 118.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 118.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF SINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 392.904, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN1A FREY EPSTEIN'S \nREVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN !AMINE S \n(REFERENCES TO CASES NOT LITIGATED BY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.56999969482422, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 369.6770324707031 + ], + [ + 107.56999969482422, + 369.6770324707031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 373.055908203125, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 373.055908203125, + 333.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 333.3170471191406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Text", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 148 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 158 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767004" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_16.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b6f1a9ac282ead9cde6aa9cbebe294f7392b25c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_16.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:42620055d7303c9bff7df14fb850d687bc5c00156f4a91cc55b1a0c62b4c6cd9 +size 12838 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b710ecaa43bde1a43835555cab540077680a6d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767004/_page_64_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9dc974e44f63e19393ee8f0c665a95fa30fca878c3f62c36e26ee991d287311d +size 14233 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b7604e2647198143b72c53c48d0fd98cbbad51a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counterplaintiffs. + +ORDER ON MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: The Court will proceed to set + +side, 2 days for hearing conference by the schedule provided by the requester, parties and will # +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3 + +day of May, 2018. + +![]()JUDGE DONALD HAFELE + +\* set the first upon hearing the matters referred to above. In an abundance of condition the approvemented copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. +hearings will be set during the looker July 2-Rept. 7, 18 of calendar call on June 22, 18 @ 9:00, +Confirmed 10 D. @ + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion for Status Conference + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola, Esquire \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for- J. + +IME J. Esquire brad@eplIc.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FL Philip Burlington, Esquire pmb@flanpellatelaw.com; kbt@Flappellatelaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721- 00 Attorneys for + +Jay Howe re jay@jaylareIrcom Jay Howell & Associates P.A. 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Phone: (904)-680-1234 Fax: (904)-68 Attorneys for S J. + +Cos + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion for Status Conference + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire paul.cassell@law.utah.edu S.J. Quinney College of Law 383 S University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 Attorneys fca + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkro ?s, .com; Angela@linIcrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.corn; rachel®IinIcrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 334 Phone: (561)-727-3600tir Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Cos + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuiiklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70ec597e5133969a6d1bbe51cbd84e3ffa7d607a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088/EFTA02767088.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767088.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3017, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.64, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 439.41599999999994, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 439.41599999999994, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 157.89600000000002, + 353.96999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 347.2940368652344, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 347.2940368652344, + 158.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 158.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767088" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5eccf2eb7b74dacd5e3105444b994742fa91d7c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.md @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOO(MB AG + +r" A Cols + +# JOINT STATEMENT PURSUAN RULE 1.201(b). FLA.R.CIV.PRO. AND CASE M A MENT REPORT + +The parties to this action, Jeffrey Epstein, Sco by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant rt's Order dated September 2, 2010, file this their Joint Statement and Initial Case ag nt Report and would state as follows: + +# A. F A AL T + +The Plaintiff seeks d ages 'nst the Defendants, Scott Rothstein and J. la , based on an ille g\q'por onzi scheme in which the Defendants and others are alleged to have participated. The ntiff ntends that the scheme involved marketing investments to outside investors in th ui rought against the Plaintiff by a number of minor females who claimed to have 1 ims of sexual molestations by the Plaintiff. Those minor females were represented for a period of time first by J. individually, and them by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("BRA') when joined that firm. Some of these lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of a Jaffee, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, LP (" Jaffee"), of which Defendant member when left RRA. became a + +The Plaintiff has alleged and claims to believe that the Defendants and perhaps other former employees of RRA conspired to use the Epstein/LM litigation and perhaps other litigation, to lure investors into making approximately \$I3 million dollars worth of investments into phoney by using pending real cases. The Plaintiff contends that he has been d aged as a result of these actions. However, the Plaintiff has refused to provide any sub 've t timony regarding his allegations or claimed beliefs based upon the assertion of I Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Ch...) + +denies being a participant in any Ponzi sche theft or criminal enterprise. Moreover claims that the real purpose of this la s of o pressure and one of his clients LM in pending ligation. has c age to his reputation, professional relationship and damages from this action. Rot'tein s not filed an answer. + +# 47—,) B. LEGAL THEORIES + +Epstein has plead claims r n \$ges based on Florida's Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act against all Defend iaims for damages based on Florida Rico's Act against all Defendants, claims for dame ₹Sr **abuse of process against all Defendants and claims for damages for fraud against at ndants and claims for damages based on conspiracy to commit fraud against all D** + +**E rds has denied the allegations of Epstein's claim for damages and has further asserted a counterclaim for damages for injury to his reputation, interference with his professional relationships, loss of value of his time and the cost of defending this action.** + +The claims against LM have been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement by and between Epstein and LM in the civil lawsuit in which LM claimed she was sexually molested by Epstein. + +Rothstein has not filed any specific pleadings in defense of Epstein's claims.A + +# C. LIKELIHOOD OF SETTLEMENT + +It is unlikely that this case can settle at this time. + +### D. LIKELIHOOD OF APPEARANCE IN ACTION OF AD O AS TIO AL PARTIES + +Epstein claims that he has a good faith belief that may have participated in the Pont Scheme authored Epstein. However, Epstein has asserted his Fifth and has refused to answer any questions co his attorneys that until further discove identify possible additional parti . embers of the former RRA , Rothstein to detriment of t privilege against self-incrimination g s claimed belief. Epstein claims through by the production RRA records, it is difficult to + +# E. THE PLAINTIFF'S P9E»bSED TIME LIMITS (To Which Defendant. a Objects) + +- (i) o jo other parties and amend pleadings: 30 days after the production of t e records from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special To file and hear motions: 60 days after the production of records from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special +- (iii) To identify any non-parties: 30 days after the production of the records from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special + +of fact and At this i it is difficult to say what the possibility would be for obtaining admissions y exchange of documents and other evidence. + +(iv) To disclose expert witnesses: 60 days before calendar call, deadline is + +November 29, 2010; + +# F. NAMES OF ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING THE ACTION A Cos + +- 1) Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein + - L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. + - F. Knight, Esquire +- 2) Defendant, J. Jack Scarola, Esq. +- 3) Defendant, Scott Rothstein Marc Nurik, Esq. + +# G. NECESSITY FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER LITATE DISCOVERY + +Unknown at this time. + +### H. THE PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSAL FORMULATION AND SIMPLIFICATION OF ISSU I G OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PARTI Objects) ARY JUDGMENT (To Which the Defendant, + +Sixty (60) days befo di JEry cut-off: December 20, 2010. + +# 1. POSSIBIL1T OBTAINING ADMISSIONS OF FACT/EXCHANGE OF DOCUMENTS STIPULATIONS REGARDING AUTHENTICITY + +any objections have already been asserted on the grounds of attorney-client work product privilege. A special has been appointed in the bankruptcy proceedings to process those documents that have been requested from the former RRA that the Plaintiff believes are relevant to his claims. In addition, document requests to Defendant, and other discovery requests have been met with attorney-client work product and other objections. + +It is also anticipated by the Plaintiff that requests for discovery from the Defendant to the Plaintiff will also require the court to rule on objections relating to privilege and matters that are irrelevant to this action. Defendant position is that all of the Plaintiff's claims are ripe for entry of a summary judgment in favor of the Defendant + +# J. ESTIONS ON ADVISABILITY AND TIMING OF MAGIS41'7\1 SPECIAL MEDIATION + +Epstein recommends that the issue of a special \*a("Ili n l/ i addressed after the productions from documents from RRA. Once those docum are produced then it may resolve some of the pending objections that presently exist. the special in the bankruptcy proceeding may resolve some of the issue for a special case. e which would eliminate the need or magistrate to spend som Wher time on the issues present in this + +has no interest in + +# K. PRELIMINARY ES IMA OF TIME REOUIRED FOR TRIAL + +Plaintiff estim 7-10 days for the entire case. 7-9 days for the trial of counter-cla + +# L. D T16N OF DOCUMENTS AND LIST OF FACT WITNESSES + +ies have already pursuant to an earlier court order submitted a list of documents and fact witnesses. Those exhibits and witness lists are incorporated herein by reference. + +# M. NUMBER OF EXPERTS AND FIELD OF EXPERTISE + +Unknown at this time for Plaintiff. Defendant anticipates calling two attorney standard of care and legal ethics experts, as well as two attorney fee/damage experts. A + +# N. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION + +None at this time. + +DATED this Orr of October, 2010. + +Respectfully submi tiw + +BURNETT, PA Attorneys for Plaintiff Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Tower West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 + +q•-• J4 eph L. Ackerman, Jr. Florida Bar #235954 Knigh Florida Bar #6073t + +Searcy De la Barnhart & Shipley Attorn dley 2139 Palm ach Lakes Boulevard West Palm each, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300 (954) 745-5849 (561) 383-9451 (fax) (954) 745-3556 (fax) + +Cos + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorneys for Scott Rothstein One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No. 169440 By: Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Florida Bar No. 272817 + +## N. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION + +None at this time. + +DATED this'"day of October, 2010. + +Respectfully submitted, + +BURNETT, PA Attorneys for Plaintiff Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Tower West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 + +By: Florida Bar #235954 L. Ackerman, Jr. Esq. ges 4; y Knight Florida Bar #607363 + +e 14/ + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley Attorneys for 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561)686-63 (561) 38 + +ola, q. Bar No. 169440 Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorneys for Scott Rothstein One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 745-5849 (954) 745-3556 (fax) + +By: Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Florida Bar No. 272817 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7ead9d321692b5395724adac34255973bd1bdfe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091/EFTA02767091.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,694 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767091.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 8497, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.057, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.4776611328125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 535.4776611328125, + 114.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 288.057, + 114.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT STATEMENT PURSUAN \nRULE 1.201(b). FLA.R.CIV.PRO. AND CASE M A MENT REPORT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.92099999999999, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 494.71771240234375, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 494.71771240234375, + 321.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 102.92099999999999, + 321.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. F A AL T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 424.44000000000005 + ], + [ + 286.839, + 424.44000000000005 + ], + [ + 286.839, + 440.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 440.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "47\u2014,) B. LEGAL THEORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.658, + 406.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 284.7771301269531, + 406.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 284.7771301269531, + 427.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 98.658, + 427.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. LIKELIHOOD OF SETTLEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 294.2021484375, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 294.2021484375, + 236.613037109375 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 236.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. LIKELIHOOD OF APPEARANCE IN ACTION OF AD \nO AS\nTIO AL PARTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 265.8515625 + ], + [ + 506.6715087890625, + 265.8515625 + ], + [ + 506.6715087890625, + 290.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 290.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. THE PLAINTIFF'S P9E\u00bbbSED TIME LIMITS (To Which Defendant. a \nObjects)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 517.771, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 517.771, + 497.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 497.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. NAMES OF ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING THE ACTION \nA Cos", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 513.6258544921875, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 513.6258544921875, + 292.57989501953125 + ], + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 292.57989501953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. NECESSITY FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER LITATE DISCOVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 507.3500061035156, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 507.3500061035156, + 346.24249267578125 + ], + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 346.24249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. THE PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSAL FORMULATION AND \nSIMPLIFICATION OF ISSU I G OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY \nJUDGMENT AND PARTI \nObjects)\nARY JUDGMENT (To Which the Defendant,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 531.048, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 531.048, + 441.92999267578125 + ], + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 441.92999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. POSSIBIL1T OBTAINING ADMISSIONS OF FACT/EXCHANGE OF \nDOCUMENTS STIPULATIONS REGARDING AUTHENTICITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 497.1436767578125, + 480.3299999999999 + ], + [ + 497.1436767578125, + 510.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 510.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "J. ESTIONS ON ADVISABILITY AND TIMING OF MAGIS41'7\\1\nSPECIAL MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 500.55999755859375, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 500.55999755859375, + 249.72802734375 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 249.72802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "K. PRELIMINARY ES IMA OF TIME REOUIRED FOR TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 444.15203857421875, + 452.79 + ], + [ + 444.15203857421875, + 469.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 469.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L. D T16N OF DOCUMENTS AND LIST OF FACT WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 474.023193359375, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 474.023193359375, + 551.8754119873047 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 551.8754119873047 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "M. NUMBER OF EXPERTS AND FIELD OF EXPERTISE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.658, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 397.420654296875, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 397.420654296875, + 126.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 98.658, + 126.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.658, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 304.39678955078125, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 304.39678955078125, + 208.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 98.658, + 208.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.64, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 308.7496643066406, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 308.7496643066406, + 157.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 124.64, + 157.7005615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767091" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c53d80653164fda71426119ec9669d2063b9daf0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.md @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffrounterdefendant, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTH TEIN ' 'vidually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counterplaintiffs. + +## "' NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED X Movant's attorney has spoken in person, email or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the celiacught in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected ,hy t represented. otion are self + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of th to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of 2018. was sent via E-Serve + +AROLA + +Bar No.: 169440 + +Ct o N E. TERRY AVID P. VITALE JR. + +I rida Bar No.: 45780 + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Attorneys for J. + +Fax: (561) .11 + +IMadv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Philip Burlington, Esquire pmb®flappellatelaw.com;kbt®Flappellatelaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +Jay Howell, Esquire jay®jayhowell.com Jay Howell & Associates P.A. 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 2 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Phone: (904)-680-1234 Fax: (904)-680-123 Attorneys for Bra4 J. + +Paul G. ire paul.casse 1 .edu S.J. Q liege of Law 383 S Univ ity Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 Attorneys for J. + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +a adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> "If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +> "Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algtin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contact° con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene distapatitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame a1711." + +> "Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kik ed. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w par& nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblim pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." /1 tir + +> > C" ) + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +ricS \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0269e80fc520a792855a5e6f0787971a017b58db --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098/EFTA02767098.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767098.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4999, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 124.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 124.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"' \nNOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 348.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 369.3789367675781, + 348.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 369.3789367675781, + 373.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 373.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFI NITERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 279.1082458496094, + 577.53 + ], + [ + 279.1082458496094, + 594.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 594.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 358.00140380859375, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 358.00140380859375, + 145.68585205078125 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 145.68585205078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 156 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767098" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf34c8d32f94ac587cb106b30305d86d05bb1a09 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.md @@ -0,0 +1,914 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +4: 81k + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFQ EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW AM ENT TO EXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste ) hereby supplements his April 27, 2018, Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhi List, states: + +- 1. Counter-Plaintiff Bradl ') complained about the more than 700 new exhibits that Epstein C yll to disclosed. Those documents were produced to on a rolling basis on rb y ry 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018, and then identified individually on Epstein's 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. (D.E. 1237.) +- 2. has reviewed his proposed exhibits and significantly narrowed them down e to 135 l. Amended Exhibit List is attached as Exhibit Li For the Court's and Edw enience, Epstein has highlighted in yellow those documents that were produced on February 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018. Epstein has also included four new items (highlighted in blue), which include the audio oa April 7, 2011, interview of + +&#x27;Epstein has renumbered his Exhibit List consecutively and will provide with a new set of the documents to correspond with his list. + +to include those documents. 3. Depending on the outcome of the Court's in camera review of the 47 documents has asserted a privilege claim over, Epstein seeks leave to amend his Exhibit List again + +4. will not be prejudiced by the amendment because no surprise, ents come as had many of them in his possession or knew abo or to the February and March 2018 productions, and the documents were product' tn exhibits more than two months ago. + +(produced by the unofficial transcript filed with the Court in May 2011, an official transcript prepared by a court reporter and a comparison of the two transcripts prepared by a court reporter.2 + +Accordingly, for the reasons set forth here Si 's e otion to Allow Amendment to his Exhibit List, Epstein respectfully requests tha grant his Motion. + +2Epstein will provide the transcript and comparison prepared by the court reporter once they are finalized. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on May 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Fr ) Primary: Scottglin ockljn.com Primary: Kamadinkrocklaw.com Primary: Raehel@linkrocklaw.com Second : Tina@linkrocklaw.com Seco Tr' inkrocklaw.com + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Ices West Palm Beac L 33 me AT M C AS) art & Shipley, P.A. yard dvitalc@searcvlm .com scarolateam(4searcylaw.com terryteam@scarcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +ou el for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant pstein + +## LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbaFLAnpellateLaw.com Co-Counselor endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# **EXHIBIT 1** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, DRAFT + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +/ + +A Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EX + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E y lists the exhibits that he may introduce at the trial of this matter. Epstein reserves + to amend this list once the Court makes a final determination on his request for an review of Counter-Plaintiff alleged privilege documents and e widen issues in this case. + +## X TO OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objectio +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 2. All obj xcept authenticity 7. Hearsay + - 8. Authenticity lacking + - 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) r immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (403) + +| No. | Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| | | Jeffiey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, | J. and L.M. | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant | J. | +| 3 | 8/2/10 | | | +| 4 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of | J. | +| 5 | 7/31/12 | tein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Volun | Dismissal Without Prejudice | +| | | of J. | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | J. | Fourth Amended | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | x | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summ | Judgment | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothst | ey J. and L.M. | +| | | 151 ' Judicial Circuit Case | 5 0 9-CA-040800XXXXMB | +| | | Deposition T | ns • is and Statements | +| 11 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcri | dl J. | +| 12 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Transc | o le J. | +| 13 | 10/10/13 | Deposition T | of J. | +| 14 | 11/10/17 | Deposition T | ri .f J. | +| 15 | 3/17/10 | Deposition T | t of Jeffrey Epstein | +| 16 | 1/25/12 | sit ranscn t of Jeffre E stem | | +| 17 | 6/14/12 | D siti | scn t of Scott Rothstein | +| 18 | 4/20/11 | sitio ranscript of | S. Adler | +| 19 | 5/25/11 | 'on Transcript of Abraxas | Discala | +| 20 | 2/11 | sition Transcript of | Kretschmar | +| 21 | | sition Transcn t of Michael Le | aro | +| 22 | 10/1 | 7 Deposition Transcript of E.W. | | +| 23 | 12/1/ 7 | Deposition Transcript of BernardJansen | | +| 24 | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger | | +| 25 | 2/26/18 | De osition Transcri .t of E.W. | | +| 26 | 4/7/11 | Audio of | and Jack Scarola's | +| 27 | 5/17/11 | Notice of Filing Transcript of | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 28 | | Transcript of the audio tape of | +| | | and Jack Scarola's A iil 7 2011 tele .honic | +| | | interview of prepared by | +| | | Court Reporter | +| 29 | | Comparison of the unofficial transcript filed by | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein J. | +| | | X Bt , | +| 30 | 4/12/10 | E stein's Request to Produce to | +| 31 | 5/11/10 | Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of | +| 32 | 5/11/10 | Response to Plaintiff's Request | +| 33 | 6/21/10 | E.stein's R nest for Admissions to w | +| 34 | 7/7/10 | Response to First Requ r | +| 35 | 4/7/11 | Request for Prod on • wards | +| 36 | 5/5/11 | | +| | | Response to E. s in Request to | +| | | Produce dated April 7 4 1 | +| 37 | 5/16/11 | Interroga es vi wards | +| 38 | 6/10/11 | | +| | | Answ' e gatories | +| 39 | 12/9/11 | E.stein's Sec" d R . st for Production to | +| 40 | 1/6/12 | to Epstein's Third Set of | +| 41 | 1/6/12 | " esponse to Request for Production | +| 42 | 2/21/13 | ' Supplemental Response to Epstein's | +| 43 | 7/25 | ands' Response to Epstein's Request for | +| 44 | 8/1 7 a | Answers to Interrogatories | +| 45 | 9/5/17 | E stein's R nest for Production to | +| 46 | 10/5/17 | Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, | +| 47 | 10/5/17 | | +| 48 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to | +| 49 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 50 | 11/13/17 a | Answers to Epstein's Expert | +| 51 | 11/13/17 | Response to Epstein's Request to | +| 52 | N/D | Privilege Log — Emails November 2009 | +| | 4/24/07 | FBI Reports / Statements A1"\" 53 Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. AS , | +| 54 | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, interview of Jane | +| 55 | 8/7/07 | | +| | | FBI reports for interview of E.W. I | +| 56 | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, interview of | +| 57 | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, interview of | +| | | 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 5 2 -028051XXXXMB | +| 58 | Misc. | Court docket | +| 59 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | +| 60 | 12/23/08 3/30/09 | Amended Complaint (S\ 61 Notice of Change of F ddress | +| 62 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstei & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to PI • ended Complaint | +| 63 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's R est f roduction to Defendant | +| 64 | 8/12/09 | Notice of P from Non-Party — Greens | +| 65 | 8/14/09 | Notice o ro uction from Non-Party — | +| | | P rmacy | +| 66 | 8/19/09 | t Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | fe es to Plaintiff's Second Amended Com taint | +| 67 | 8/19 | | +| 68 | 8/20/ | Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production | +| 69 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) | +| 70 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 71 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding | +| | | Depositions of Visoski and David Hart | +| 72 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | +| 73 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'sM ace a e | +| 74 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 75 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 76 | Misc. | J Court docket | +| 77 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. 1) | +| 78 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D. | +| 79 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | +| | | 15"' Judicial Circuit Case No. -028058XXXXMB | +| 80 | Misc. | Court docket | +| 81 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | +| 82 | 12/23/08 3/30/09 | Amended Complaint S''\' 83 Notice of Change of ddress | +| 84 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstei ' & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to P1 • U ended Complaint | +| 85 | 5/18/09 | Notice of Ta g D ition Duces Tecum to | +| | | Myspace with ace's production in response | +| 86 | 6/2/09 | Defend Motion for Order to Terminate | +| | | or Limit ition and Response in Opposition to | +| | | P I tiff's ended Motion to Compel for | +| 87 | 7/16/09 | otice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 88 | | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 89 | 8/1 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 90 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 91 | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. and Video of | +| 92 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 93 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 94 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------|-------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| | | | | | | + +## Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 95 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +|-----|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 96 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | | | +| 97 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | | | +| 98 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | | | +| 99 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | +| 100 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | +| 101 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | +| 102 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, Nadia Marcinkova, Jean Luc Bruhel, Sarah Kellen, Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | +| 103 | 9/30/09 | Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe and Video of Deposition | | | +| 104 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | +| 105 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | + +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 106 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +| 107 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction
Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets
Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of
Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond
to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | + +## aneDoe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) SDCS.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 108 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in | +| 109 | 10/16/09 | PlaintiffJane Doe's Notice that Additional | +| 110 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide | +| | | and Incorporated Supporting Memo of La E. | +| III | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) 1. | + +# CVRA Co cations + +| 112 | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villaf4; | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 113 | 6n/07 | Letter from A. | Villa | +| 114 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | t | +| 115 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | o ii • Eisenberg | +| 116 | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. S •th,o | e Doe | +| 117 | 7/3/08 | Letter from B .14 | ., to Ann C. | +| 118 | 7/9/08 | Letter f | A. Villafana to Brad | +| 119 | 7/9/08 | r fro | A. Villafana to Brad re | +| 120 | 7/17/08 | tte rom Brad | to Ann Villafana | +| 121 | 1 | tter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 122 | 10/ 08 | Letter from Brad | to Dexter Lee | +| 123 | 12/10/ 0 | Letter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 124 | 3/1/11 | Letter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 125 | 3/15/11 | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell | | +| 126 | 3/20/11 | Letter from R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | | +| 127 | 3/22/11 | Letter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 128 | 9/29/11 | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 129 | N/D | Court Docket | | | | +| 130 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 131 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| 132 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 133 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 134 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 135 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 136 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 137 | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| 138 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 139 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 140 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | +| 141 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 142 | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 143 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 144 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 145 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 146 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against █████ J. █████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 147 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 148 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against █████ James █████ ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 149 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 150 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 151 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 152 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 153 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 154 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 155 | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 156 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 157 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 158 | 12/14/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 159 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 160 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 161 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 162 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 163 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 164 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — P.M. | +| 165 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 166 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 167 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 168 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 169 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothste' | +| | | Morning Session ), | +| 170 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rot | + +| 171 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to ██████ J.
██████, cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 172 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to ██████
Adler (01620) | | | | +| 173 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to ██████
Adler (01446) | | | | +| 174 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to ██████ J.
██████, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. ██████ (01726) | | | | +| 175 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to ██████ J.
Edwards (05725) | | | | +| 176 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-██████ il chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Russel
Adler (01574) | | | | +| 177 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William
Berger (02231) | | | | +| 178 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to ██████
██████ and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 179 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan
Spencer Wendell (01449) | | | | +| 180 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to
██████ J. ██████ (05148) | | | | +| 181 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Timothy
Malloy (01450) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 182 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 183 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 184 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 185 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 186 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 187 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 188 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 189 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 190 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05239) | | | | +| 191 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 192 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 193 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 194 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05324-05325) | | | | +| 195 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 196 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05344-05346) | | | | +| 197 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 198 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 199 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 200 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 201 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 202 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 203 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee
(01462) | | | | +| 204 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 205 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 206 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 207 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 208 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 209 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01661) | | | | +| 210 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 211 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Russell Adler (02684-02685) | | | | +| 212 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 213 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 214 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05803) | | | | +| 215 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 216 | 7/22/09 | Letter from Bradley J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 217 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 218 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 219 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 220 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 221 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | +| 222 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 223 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11075-11076) | | | | +| 224 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(05852-05853) | | | | +| 225 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 226 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 227 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 228 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11080-11082) | | | | +| 229 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie ██████ to ██████
(05087) | | | | +| 230 | 8/2/09
1:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (03694) | | | | +| 231 | 8/10/09
5:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Jacquie ██████ (15113-15114) | | | | +| 232 | 8/10/09
5:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Edwards to Jacquie ██████ (00158) | | | | +| 233 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 234 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 235 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06967) | | | | +| 236 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 237 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
Edwards (06963-06964) | | | | +| 238 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 239 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06959-06960) | | | | +| 240 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06975) | | | | +| 241 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 242 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 243 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06976-06977) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 244 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 245 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 246 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 247 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113) | | | | +| 248 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat (05112) | | | | +| 249 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 250 | 8/26/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Bradley [REDACTED] (01406) | | | | +| 251 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 252 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 253 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 254 | 9/4/09
11:18 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell and William Berger (02043) | | | | +| 255 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07612-07613) | | | | +| 256 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (02595-02596) | | | | +| 257 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED] (07614-07615) | | | | +| 258 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07605-07606) | | | | +| 259 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07607-07608) | | | | +| 260 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07609-07611) | | | | +| 261 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04015) | | | | +| 262 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07646) | | | | +| 263 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07647) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 264 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07676-07677) | | | | +| 265 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07674-07675) | | | | +| 266 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07678-07679) | | | | +| 267 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07684-07685) | | | | +| 268 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07682-07683) | | | | +| 269 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07695-07697) | | | | +| 270 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07680-07681) | | | | +| 271 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07686-07688) | | | | +| 272 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (07689-07691) | | | | +| 273 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 274 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 275 | 9/17/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to William
Berger (02088) | | | | +| 276 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318) | | | | +| 277 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 278 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 279 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 280 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 281 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 282 | 9/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul
Cassell (08459) | | | | +| 283 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 284 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (04321) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 285 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 286 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 287 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 288 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 289 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 290 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita
[REDACTED] (19986-19987) | | | | +| 291 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 292 | 10/1/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08348-08349) | | | | +| 293 | 10/1/09
1:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08355) | | | | +| 294 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 295 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 296 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 297 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 298 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael
Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 299 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 300 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 301 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard
[REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 302 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott
Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip
Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED]
(26507) | | | | +| 303 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 304 | 10/13/09
2:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J.
Discala, [REDACTED] Kretschmar and D. Von Allmen
(23299-23300) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 305 | 10/13/09 | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | +| | 2:37 p.m. | (26827) | +| 306 | 10/13/09 | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | +| | 4:02 p.m. | (26094-26096) | +| 307 | 10/13/09 | E-mail chain — from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein | +| | 5:38 p.m. | (27277-27278 | +| 308 | 10/13/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to Jacquie | +| | 7:00 p.m. | cc Mike Fisten 017441m | +| 309 | 10/14/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to | +| | 7:39 a.m. | 03190 | +| 310 | 10/14/09 | E-mail chain - from to J. O | +| | 9:02 a.m. | 03189 | +| 311 | 10/14/09 | E-mail chain - from Adler to J. L. ) | +| | 10:42 a.m. | cc Jacquie (010191 | +| 312 | 10/14/09 | E-mail chain - from J. IMI to | +| | 12:20 p.m. | Fisten cc Ja le (01741) | +| 313 | 10/15/09 | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to em, | +| | 8:59 p.m. | D. Von Allmen (26882) | +| 314 | 10/16/09 | E-mail chain - from ABA Jo kly | +| | 5:29 a.m. | Newsletter to Scott Rothste. 5 5865) | +| 315 | 10/16/09 | E-mail chain - from Micha 1 ee er to Mike | +| | 11:00 a.m. | Fisten, Edwag id Pa (01255) | +| 316 | 10/19/09 | E-mail chain - fro to Ken | +| | 10A6 a.m. | Jenne 01704 | +| 317 | 10/20/09 | E-mail chain m tt Rothstein to Preve | +| | 12:41 p.m. | (27303) | +| 318 | 10/20/09 | E-mail 'n - from Rush to J. | +| | 1:01 p.m. | ) | +| 319 | 10/20/09 | 'I ch - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| 320 | 10/22/ | chain — from Scott Rothstein to A.J. | +| | 11:17 | D cala, Christopher Podaras and Kretschmar | +| 321 | 10 09 | E-mail chain - from M J. to Jacquie | +| | 11:52 .m. | 01391 | +| 322 | 10/22/09 | E-mail chain - from to Jacquie | +| | 1:48 • .m. | 04996 | +| 323 | 10/22/09 | E-mail chain - from Jacquie to | +| | 2:52 p.m. | Adler, Cam L. Mike Fisten, Michael J. | +| | | J. Barry J. and Ken Jenne, | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 325 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 326 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 327 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 328 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 329 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01623) | | | | +| 330 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 331 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01625) | | | | +| 332 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 333 | 3/18/10
1:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. Schmidt to Tom Hartog and Donnie | | | | +| 334 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 335 | 3/24/10
2:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog | | | | +| 336 | 4/1/10
3:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Story Cowles | | | | +| 337 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 338 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000001-BJE0000000005) | | | | +| 339 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 340 | 7/14/10 -
1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 341 | 1/1/80 –
2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 342 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 343 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 344 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 345 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 346 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr.
( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 347 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] – Presentations, Recognitions, Bios | | | | | | +| 348 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 349 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 350 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 351 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 352 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad Edwards
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad_[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 353 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 354 | 11/8/17 | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 355 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 356 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jaffe's Website | | | | | | +| 357 | 11/9/17 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 358 | 5/7/12 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 359 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 360 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 361 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 362 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 363 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 364 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 365 | | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Jaffe with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------| +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court | +| | | Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey O % | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Agai | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Kee ds | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVBS. Jury Awards \$24 Mil Mass. | +| | | Widower in Fatal Cabana C h | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC-6. Jury Awards 24 k in atal Cabana | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. July a lions to Husband of | +| | | Pregnant Woma e Drunk Driver | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. ury A rds \$24 Million to Widower | +| | | in Fatal Caba Cr sh | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Dail B ness Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| | | Legend ershowitz Over Sex Offender | +| O. | 4/21/14 | Wash ngton Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| | | is ty Can Move Forward on My Crime | +| P. | 4/21 | m Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| | | Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal | +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami , Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel . Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review . Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review . Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review . Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 366 | 8/10/16 | [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com . The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News . Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel . Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News . Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News . Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | [REDACTED], Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review . Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| Pottinger's Website & Verdicts | | | | | | +| 367 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 368 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] Lawsuits | | | | | | +| 369 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 370 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 371 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 372 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 373 | Misc. | Docket; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 374 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 375 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 376 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 377 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 378 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 379 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 380 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 381 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 382 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 383 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 384 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 385 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 386 | Misc. | Docket; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 387 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 388 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 389 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 390 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 391 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 392 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 393 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 394 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 395 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 396 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 397 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 398 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 399 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 400 | | Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 401 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 402 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 403 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 404 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | Experts | | | | +| 405 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +| 406 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 407 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 408 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | Other Articles | | | | +| 409 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 410 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 411 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 412 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 413 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 414 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 415 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 416 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 417 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 418 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 419 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 420 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 421 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 422 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 423 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 424 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 425 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 426 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part III | | | | +| 427 | 11/18/09 | Former RRA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 428 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 429 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 430 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 431 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 432 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 433 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 434 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 435 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 436 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 437 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 438 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 439 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 440 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One | +| 441 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | +| 442 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 443 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 444 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 445 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O s | +| 446 | N/D | Demons Cycle Photographs depi and/or | +| | | L. P /4\ ecords | +| 447 | | License Details - L. • 1 ialist | +| 448 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach Coun Office Offense | +| 449 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach unty 'ff's Office Offense | +| | | Re rt No. 03- | +| 450 | 1/5/04 | Anna T v. Scott 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| | | Palm unty Case No. 2004 DR 001691 | +| | | P on fo Injunction for Protection Against | +| | | e t Violence | +| 451 | 2/8/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 452 | | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 453 | 7/6/ | In re L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach | +| 454 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 455 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 456 | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 20th Judicial Circuit, Lee County Case No. 08-DR-003141 - Petition to Determine Paternity | | | | +| 457 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 458 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 459 | 2010 | Twitter Account – L.M. | | | | +| 460 | 4/16/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-10-1058307 | | | | +| 461 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 462 | 2/10/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; West Palm Beach Police Department, Report No. 94-12-2384 | | | | +| 463 | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 42-13-00742 | | | | +| 464 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 465 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 466 | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| | | | | | | +| E.W. – Public Records | | | | | | +| 467 | 1/23/18 | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 088078-3334 | | | | +| 468 | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed from Homes by West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 469 | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed from E.W. to Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 470 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 207384-0000 | | | | +| 471 | 2/24/15 | Warranty Deed from William C. Moody and Carole M. Shelton to James S. Moody, III and E.W. | | | | +| 472 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal History Information Report on E.W. | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 473 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report No. 2040097 | | | | +| 474 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-067231 | | | | +| 475 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-067249 | | | | +| 476 | 5/20/03 | Eva █████ v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 03-1633; Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 477 | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-091886 | | | | +| 478 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-096606 | | | | +| 479 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 | | | | +| 480 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 03-19767 | | | | +| 481 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 03-21604 | | | | +| 482 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 and Lake Worth Police Department Information Sheet Case No. 04-20500 | | | | +| 483 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 06-049448 | | | | +| 484 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 | | | | +| 485 | 12/6/06 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Boynton Beach Police Department Report No. 34-06-61580 | | | | +| 486 | 6/9/07 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report No. 7028375 | | | | +| 487 | 6/15/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; █████ Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 86-07-603178 | | | | +| 488 | 6/15/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-603178 | | | | +| 489 | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Boynton Beach Police Department Report No. 34-07-140204 | | | | +| 490 | 5/30/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause Affidavit and Offense Report; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-09-085397 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 491 | 9/5/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 492 | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 493 | 5/8/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 494 | 5/12/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 495 | 5/13/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 496 | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W., 111° Judicial C ui | +| 497 | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E. W., 11" J ci Circuit, | +| | | Miami Dade County Case 32 - | +| 498 | 6/21/13 | Florida DUI Uniform c Ci tion, Pinellas | +| | | County, Officer W d Complaint/Arrest | +| 499 | 11/20/15 | State of Flori C v. E. i , 13" Judicial Circuit, | +| | | Hillsborough un Case No. 2015-CF-016193; | +| 500 | 4/4/16 | Crimina 1.-V . Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | R ort N. 6-190831; Case No. 16-4733 | +| 501 | 4/4/16 | fr ia1 Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | Po o.16-190881 | +| 502 | 12/5 | to of Florida v. E. W., 13" Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 503 | ' | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property | +| 504 | 11/1/10 | General Warranty Deed from Glenn R. | +| 505 | 3/12/14 | Warranty Deed from Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------| +| 506 | 1/18/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| 507 | 7/12/00 | Arrest Affidavit; Dial | +| 508 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy Huff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County — Dsnition of Jane Doe | +| 509 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammy=Huff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County Case No, 00-875-CFA — | +| 510 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 511 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report No. 02-108484 OP" | +| 512 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 513 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offe | +| | | Report No. 02-116357 yy | +| 514 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office e | +| 515 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's e ense | +| 516 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. Bra Dia 916 Judicial | +| | | Circuit, Co o. 00-375 — | +| 517 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach Cq ffs Office Offense | +| 518 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report - 16298 | +| 519 | 9/29/03 | Pa Bea County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 520 | 12/1/03 | es Im Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 521 | 1/ | est Palm Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 522 | 10/7 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 523 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 524 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 525 | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------| +| 526 | 12/26/06 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 527 | 4/28/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 528 | 9/12/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear; Delray Beach Police | +| 529 | 12/9/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 530 | 2/2/11 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | + +## - Publ + +| 531 | 11/4/97 | ██████████ Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 97-002687 | | | | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 532 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-027604 | | | | +| 533 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-000343 | | | | +| 534 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-041883 | | | | +| 535 | N/D | In re Daniel Roberts III , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2000-GA-000718 - Docket | | | | +| 536 | 6/10/01 | ██████████ Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 01-002214 | | | | +| 537 | 8/3/01 | Royal Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 01-003008 | | | | +| 538 | 3/2/02 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
Affidavit; Greenacres Department of Public Safety
Report No. 42-02-14029 | | | | +| 539 | Misc. | State of Florida v. ██████████ , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-MMM-011621; Docket and Case Information | | | | +| 540 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 02-075321 | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +J. and Paul Cassell v. Dershowitz 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-1500072 + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 541 | 1/6/15 | Complaint | | | | +| 542 | 4/8/16 | Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 543 | 4/8/16 | Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement | | | | +| | | | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 544 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, ██████ J. ██████ or any witnesses listed by either party | | | | +| 545 | | All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery and any documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits, in all matters identified herein | | | | +| 546 | | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 547 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 548 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 549 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 550 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 551 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 552 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 553 | | Any and all exhibits listed by ██████ J. ██████ (by identifying these as exhibits, Epstein is not waiving his right to object to any of ██████ exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Fr ) Primary: Scon®Iin ockljiw.com Primary: Karaailinkrocklaw.com Primary: Raciici@linkrocklaw.com Seconds Tina@1inkrocklaw.com SecondaiTrgwWlinkrocklaw.com + +ou el for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant pstein + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr Searcy, Denny, la, Bhmltart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Bi.ah Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@scarcvlaw.com jsxO law.com dvitale@ rcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terryteam(asearcylaw.com Co-Counseetiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb©FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +.1. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad®eplIc.com Co-CounseSiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergerfaagwpa.com smahoney@agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaint Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellnelaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor C i !for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe C + +Jay H Jay o e Associates e Blvd., Suite 250 1 c Ile, FL 32211 h ell.com ited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe + +Gs' \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c784f594d3c9da45a6eee493c74a301277260f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103/EFTA02767103.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1571 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767103.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 40, + "chars": 145764, + "elapsed_seconds": 22.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFQ EPSTEIN'S \nSUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW AM ENT TO EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.144, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 513.3668823242188, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 513.3668823242188, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 417.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 417.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0867919921875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.0867919921875, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED EX", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 362.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "X TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 375.068359375, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 375.068359375, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 413.0818176269531, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 413.0818176269531, + 157.10302734375 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 157.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "aneDoe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) \nSDCS.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 442.32232666015625, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 442.32232666015625, + 563.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 563.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CVRA Co cations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 380.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 380.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 379.08000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- Publ", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 339.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 339.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 443.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 178 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767103" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70c143cff83cd5c5ca38459414627f165889034a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3OOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS DIRECTIONS TO C STEIN'S COUNSEL'S ACT INFORMATION AND UPDATE FILE + +A Cos + +Link & Rockenbach, PA, co laintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, provides notice of the change of its contact information as follows: + +> Link & Rocke\$i, PA 1555 Palm ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite Pa West Palm ch, Florida 33401 Telephope: f5611847-440Q Fac4tile: (5611 855-2891 + +Link kNeilbach, PA gives further notice that the following secondary e-mail address should be from the service list in this case: + +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on May 15, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr Searcy, Denny, a, B6mltart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm B Boulevard West Pal FL 33409 sea law.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terryteam(asearcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suilk 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken Rachel J. GI Primary: S Primary: Prim S ch ( 'BN 44903) 7251) klaw.com krocklaw.com acheVililinkrocklaw.com TrovQ1inkrocklaw.com + +Tne Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 4cL ef ffrey Epstein + +## RVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb©FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bf57a7c758194c96a12541331a88e6a9f7b3297 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143/EFTA02767143.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767143.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4668, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nNOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS \nDIRECTIONS TO C \nSTEIN'S COUNSEL'S \nACT INFORMATION AND \nUPDATE FILE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.144, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 512.639404296875, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 512.639404296875, + 383.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 383.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767143" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6fd0a176c3ac1af0536fc64481cbc535dc161f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMountcr-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, 4• Almc + +( L.,O 1 + +## NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S T V D ICET + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Court will s t i listed below for a two-day hearing on its July 2, 2018, through September 7, 20 t ;\$0140, trial docket. Counsel shall appear at calendar call on June 22, 2018, at 9:00 a.m 11%, m Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida, Cou oom 10D. /s t. + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +| No. | Motion/Request | | +|-----|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | +| 1 | 10/5/17 | Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against [REDACTED] and His Counsel [D.E. 1009] | +| 2 | 11/13/17 | Edwards' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1051] | +| | 11/17/17 | Edwards' Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1077] | +| 3 | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V only; Section I addressed at 12/7/17 hearing) [D.E. 1100 and 1101]
[Heard on 12/7/17, but not completed] | +| | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege [D.E. 1102 and 1103] | +| 4 | 12/11/17 | [REDACTED] Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1113] | + +| No. | Date | Motion/Request | +|-----|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 5 | 12/22/17 1/25/18 2/22/18 3/7/18 | | +| 6 | 1/10/18 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements | +| | | — Motion was denied as to three clients on 2/28/18, but Court | +| 7 | 1/18/18 | Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of I No. 132 | +| 8 | 2/1/18 | Epstein's Motion in Limine on Newly Disclo hibits and | +| | | to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Wh. N. Deposed in this Matter [D.E. 1176] | +| 9 | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice [D.E. 1 | +| 10 | 2/12/18 | Second Motion to Lift Confid a esignation of Epstein's | +| | | Disclosure of Confidential Settlemen on [D.E. 1196] | +| 11 | 2/26/18 | Motion to Compel R f &missions [D.E. 1225] | +| 12 | 3/2/18 | Motion in Limine i he Introduction of Evidence Alleged to | +| | | Support Epstein's Claims list dwards [D.E. 1243] | +| 13 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Motion for 's ermfission to Alter Trial Evidence to Comply with Rule 2.425 | +| 14 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Mo 'on fo urt's Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing | +| | | Names with tial of Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] | +| 15 | 3/5/18 | Epstei own for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature | +| | | Ap • • • tment of Special [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] | +| | 4/4/ | s m's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to [D.E. 1319] | +| | 4/5/18 | Epstein's Supplemental Authority [D.E. 1320] | +| 16 | 3/26/18 | Motion to Change Case Caption [D.E. 1305] | +| 17 | 3/29/18 | Epstein's Motion to Address Scheduling and Professionalism [D.E. 1309] | +| 18 | 4/3/18 4/6/18 | | +| 19 | 4/27/18 | Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List [D.E. 1334]; Supplement [D.E. 1341] | + +| No. | Date | Motion/Request | +|-----|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 20 | 4/29/18 | Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness [D.E. 1335] | +| 21 | 5/2/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify his Trial Witnesses [D.E. 1338] | + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorney Service List below on May 25, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pun of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). on the rida Rule + +Jack Scar (se Karen E. Davi , Jr. Searcy, y, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsx®searcylaw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcvlaw.com terryteam@searcylaw.com Co-Counseitlendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH 1555 Palm Beach Lakes ou Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Flori 33 1 (561) 847-4408; 91 [fax] + +By: /s/Scott + +Scott t N 602991) 4 ma J. Glasser (FBN 577251) ICAV.,w ockenbach (FBN 44903) Z : Scott@linkrocklaw.com ary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com ry: Rachel@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLArapellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintff + +J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvälida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gestos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo mes 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunal q4 inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo ant ef,Ss la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted S e e • capacitacion del oido o de la voz, Name al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kon ameriken Id Enfim yo na Highway, West Palm Bea jou anvan dat ou ge apre ou fin mwens ke V lb ; e akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan enn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou my Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou al Konte Palm Beach la kf nan 205 North Dixie lorida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 evou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman nvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fcaf29b36a445b127b7ca62bd88bdcfff3764e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146/EFTA02767146.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767146.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 12784, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.52, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S T V D ICET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.388, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.94317626953125, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 459.94317626953125, + 307.863037109375 + ], + [ + 152.388, + 307.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 184.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 184.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 529.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 529.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767146" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2f30de6e879b438f013904dab472e44d6e473ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +DATO une 13, 2018 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## (Rothstein's Counsel r elephonically) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plain at the time stated below, before the Beach County Courthouse, 205 33401: Epstein, will call up the following hearing Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida + +MOTION: Defe idaht Scott Com taint Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended + +8:45 am. (UMC) + +Go + +### LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may he represented. affected by the are self + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fumis Service List below on June 4, 2018, through the Court's e-fil Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the I pursuant to Florida Rule of + ++6s + +O + +LINK, BACH, PA 155 4 ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 %8 each, Florida 33401 ) -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +'Sily• /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +> 7'rial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvIlida que necesita algun actmodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene tenet- gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie HighwarWest Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por !flaws 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfi ,td en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa. okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontaktg Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan T i final Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin rescvna konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..889029d801082d2742a5388b4ce84370c67e7f93 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151/EFTA02767151.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767151.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10570, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(Rothstein's Counsel \nr elephonically)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 437.62176513671875, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 437.62176513671875, + 376.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 376.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767151" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76dbd955c73caccd2f26c94966c04d18fc05c06a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## RE-NOTICE OF UM (Cancels 6/13/18 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plain at the time stated below, before the Beach County Courthouse, 205 N 33401: pstein, will call up the following hearing nald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm ighway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida + +A + +Goes + +MOTION: De t. , t Scott Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Co un.n . mitt + +DAT e 20, 2018' + +TI . 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +&#x27;Defendant Scott Rothstein's counsel has been contacted to coordinate the new date, but he has not responded. If he is unavailable, Epstein's counsel will re-notice the hearing to a mutually agreeable date. + +### LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be represented. affected by the are self + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on June 7, 2018, through the Court's e-fil' Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the I pursuant to Florida Rule of + ++6s + +O + +LINKIR B ACH, PA 155 Al t B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 I each, Florida 33401 ) -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +\* + +rk /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]

| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com

|

Nurik
Prices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
mare@nuriklaw.com

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu

| +|

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com

| +| |

[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]

| + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara4ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida que necesita algun c miento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de ho, tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la a mabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por 19447 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun id en pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san o jwen kek ed. Tanpri ko ameriken Id Enfim yo nan Highway, West Pal jou anvan dat o apre ou fin r mwens ke en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou akte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou wåliinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 ndevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la situ gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca00a748321137ba2534fc57722ded01671f0b19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155/EFTA02767155.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767155.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10369, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF UM \n(Cancels 6/13/18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 395.352, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 395.352, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767155" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1cde87e9643327bc2c09cf9000d5414db0b959b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X,OCOMAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifMounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT RESPONSE FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER A EPSTEIN'S SANCTIONS RVENORS' JOINDER + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps Plaintiff CM4 ,0 1:r, '')responds in opposition to Counter-018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', and the Intervenors' 'I 8, Joinder and states: + +Cos + +In order to j his Motion for Sanctions, concocts a patently absurd construction of th our '3yverbal ruling on March 8, 2018, asserting that Epstein was prohibited from refe to the 27,000+ pages contained on the CD. His claim is that Eps this Court's ruling the four times Epstein "referenced" the documents at issue, in one fili with this Court and three filings with the Fourth District Court of Appeal. Motion is just another attempt to derail an in camera review of documents wrongfully withheld by which review is critical to ensure a fair and complete examination of all relevant + +&#x27;A written Order has not been issued on the Court's March 8, 2018, rulings. + +evidence in this case. wants to gag Epstein and prevent him from being able to seek appellate review concerning the Court's striking of the exhibits (a review which this Court expressly contemplated as part of its ruling)2 or defend himself in the Bankruptcy Court proceedings initiated by M. In addition, under a gag ruling, M, himself, would be in violation of the Court's ruling by his reference to the e-mails in filings in this Court, the Appellate Court and the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, Epstein has taken numerous affrrmativeStllrto ensure compliance with the Court's directives at the March 8, 2018 hearing. Th • led, the 47 exhibits (also referred to as "e-mails") are sealed and no further di y Epstein or his attorneys has occurred. And Epstein's general references and Ct I e- 'Is in connection with requests to this Court the Fourth District Court of A dicial relief certainly comply with the Court's rulings and provide no basis for s SS" + +The Bankruptcy Court's November 20 i t rder, issued by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray (the "November 2010 Agreed erNeontains no confidentiality or non-disclosure provisions and does not, itself, pro neral references to the e-mails about which complains. The November 20 A Order merely described the procedure by which would print copies 'i nvents to be produced in response to Epstein's Subpoena directed to the Bankruptc tee drtd directed not to retain any copies of the documents contained on Y or any images of the documents in the memories of its copiers. Whether or not and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. + +2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under seal to protect his appellate rights). (Exhibit A.) + +Following a preliminary hearing on Motion for an Order to Show Cause held on April 13, 2018 in the Bankruptcy Court, Judge Ray ordered discovery that is focused on the allegations of federal civil contempt relating to the alleged violations of the November 2010 Agreed Order. Specifically, may take the depositions of (1) representative about the chain of custody of the discovery documents; (2) Epste about his knowledge or possession of the disc or documents pre-2018; and (3) Link & Rot ch, PA's representative about the chain of custody of the disc. The Bankruptcy ined that its role is only to review whether contained on the disc or any images of the documents in the me 'es actil copiers. Issues pertaining to the relevance of the documents con s e disc or the applicability of any privileges to those documents are well outside is, opc of the November 2010 Agreed Order and the Bankruptcy Court's current rev' S. 018 Show Cause Order and Judge Ray's i " ili v review of and Epstein' pli e with the November 2010 Agreed Order are now pending in the Bankruptcy C ose issues need not be heard a second time by this Court. or Epstein retained f the documents + +Motion on the 27,000+ pages contained on the disc. However, this Court recognized that II of tlfe documents contained on the disc were subject to claimed privilege an ct, many thousands of pages from the disc have already been produced in the cas mg more than 80 documents produced by that were listed on his privilege log). Thus, the Court expressly stated that its ruling was only applicable to the 473 exhibits that identified as privileged. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 76:8-21.) The Court made it clear that it was prohibiting any reference to or use of those exhibits at the trial. (3/18/18 Aft. Tr. 75:24-76:6.) + +&#x27;Edwards claimed it is 49 exhibits, but two of the numbers he referenced were pages contained within another exhibit, making the total 47 exhibits which are in dispute.

This, of course, makes sense because the Court was not making, and has not made, a ruling as to whether any of the 47 exhibits are protected by any privilege. The Court expressly ruled only that the exhibits were untimely and the Court was not going to conduct an in camera review three days before trial.

To date, the oral rulings made by this Court at the March 8, 2018, hearing ha e not been reduced to a written Order. To be clear, however, Epstein has fully complied e Court's rulings. In fact, it was Epstein's current counsel who: (1) disclosed the (ipas• custody of the disc and the limited disclosure of documents to Epstein; (2) immedi c ted and assisted in sealing docket entries 1242 and 1252; (3) filed Noti ci t steps taken to comply with the Court's rulings; and (4) a t e h District Court of Appeal's stay was partially lifted, moved to file the disc anSic, Agreed Order allowing the sealing. Epstein counsel have completely complied with this Court's rulings regarding the cl A...... nd et 47 exhibits. pliance setting forth the bits under seal and obtained an

argument that privileged documents in any co log required under Florid prohibited general references to even assertedly er than at trial is completely nonsensical. Even a privilege of Civil Procedure as a condition to withhold documents on the basis of privilege t sufffiiently identify the specific documents withheld with enough detail to facilitate the tion of and challenges to the privileges asserted therein. TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johns . 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp., No. 97-C-1292, 2000 WL 1863543 (N.D. III. Dec. 14, 2000). Had the Court issued the expansive prohibition sought by , it would have effectively precluded Epstein from seeking an appellate review of the Court's rulings and defending himself in the Bankruptcy Court proceedings relating to the November 2010 Agreed Order, both of which were expressly contemplated by this

Court at the March 8th hearing. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 62:6-12.) It would also have interfered with appropriate efforts by Epstein's counsel to further pursue an in camera review of the e-mails in pre-trial proceedings, something which this Court recognized at the May 23, 2018, hearing is properly before it in light of the new trial schedule created by the Fourth District's rulings. (5/23/18 Tr. 13:9-23)4 Moreover, none of the general references for which would have Epstein sanctioned violated any privileges or contain, even arguably, confidential inflflomitn. See paragraphs 12, 14 and 17 of Motion identifying Epstein's alle St'on. And the issue of whether any of those documents is even privileged has nev o n determined by this or any other court. Accordingly, for these reasons, c 1 Motion has absolutely no merit.

If, in fact, believes that he has "no ' iii" in the e-mails, then Epstein urges to agree post haste for the Court to i Sts camera whether any privilege or workproduct protection exists as to the 47 e " . e 47 exhibits go to the very heart of disingenuous allegation that there plete absence of probable cause for Epstein to sue and they readily def t Ed ds' claim of purported damages! nevertheless withheld them and cone 'r existence through the device of a deliberately vague and legally non-compliant p No court has ever reviewed the 47 exhibits in camera and determined if, in fact, an otected or if (as Epstein is confident such a review will confirm) they should be sub' light of the courtroom in this civil action against Epstein. seeks millions of dollars for claimed reputational damage; these e-mails demonstrate the falsity oa claim that he was hurt by Epstein's lawsuit and that Epstein had no reasonable basis to allege that was involved in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme using the tort claimants' cases.

&#x27;The May 23, 2018, hearing transcript is attached as Exhibit B.

Finally, Epstein urges this Court to recognize that moving to prevent Epstein from discussing the exhibits generally is simply another transparent attempt by the truth. to hide asked the Fourth District Court of Appeal to strike general statements made in briefing before it on the basis that Epstein violated this Court's ruling. The Fourth District Court of Appeal, however, rejected =I' argument and refused to strike Epstein's genera statements that the e-mails are case-ending and defeat malicious prosecution claim t Epstein. This Court should similarly reject arguments and deny his Motion s ctions.

THE COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018, HEAR!

On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set Motions, including Motion to Strike Epstein's m4upplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Docume t7fmg Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log. Because the trial w "So y a number of pending e business days away, the Court found that Epstein's then recently identified e • Iscms e untimely and, because of that, the Court did not have sufficient time to cond assertions. camera inspection to evaluate =I privilege

At that hearing, th recognized that the jurisdiction over the November 2010 Agreed Order was that oftlJBa ptcy Court:

ey're not coming in here, and I would hope elsewhere, if it's A\m"\° g to be at the sacrifice not only as to the orderly administration f justice, but also in derogation of a federal bankruptcy court's order or any court of recognized jurisdiction's order that would have the necessary supervisionary control of a given case, but also at the potential extermination or derogation of a privilege. And for all of those reasons is why I am extremely reluctant to start taking these things into consideration just a few days prior to trial .

Epstein a rolling production of his newly disclosed exhibits (which fell into general categories) to on February 2, 2018, February 16, 2018, and March 2, 2018. Epstein then individually identified each of those exhibits according to the Clerk's pm-marking guidelines on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List.

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 54:9-20) (emphasis added).

This Court's rulings were focused on not allowing Epstein to use the late-disclosed exhibits at trial, including referencing the stricken exhibits at trial, and to sealing the disc and the alleged privileged 47 exhibits to protect Epstein's appellate record:

MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, may we include in the order a direction that opposing counsel is required to relinquish possessio of all copies of the privileged documents to the Court under

THE COURT: Well, the only thing that obviously has to into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Eps they're going to preserve those rights in light of th Court has rejected the last-minute request for i for the reasons that I've already stated at len a at the pection record.

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 62:2-12.)

The Court wanted to ensure that Epstein dj \*th r use the alleged privileged documents at trial or refer to their contents, thereby getting info tion in by the "back door":

Mr. Epstein will be ba it relates to the d from any other were the subjec coming in throw the front. 8d from referring to any of those records as hat were gathered from or would have included those records that e Ray's order. So it's to preclude anything ck door which wouldn't be allowed through

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 7

Both the all disseminated: counsel accepted Epstein's counsel's representations of who ileged documents were shared with and that the documents would not be further

... no further dissemination is going to be made. I think that goes without saying as far as the attorneys are concerned. ... I have no doubt in my mind that they will all be respectful of the court order of non-dissemination of any of those documents hence forth.

And Mr. Link [Epstein's counsel] has already represented to the Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his co-counsel, that there have been no eyes laid upon these documents. Hence, I'm accepting that representation, as Mr. Scarola has accented those, representations during the hearing as well.

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added).

Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar representation made by =. In response, the Court referenced a "blanket confidentiality order' 'fy that and Epstein's other former counsel were included in the nonntli ation ruling:

As a general blanket order I would simply say that all have or are representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject t confidentiality, of sealing and of non-dissem' information that is contemplated in any of t part of the umbrella order of Judge Ray. AAli a h of the exhibits that we spoke about today(s , i a matter of record. C 0 er of ny such ents that are Id include all ave been filed as

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 79:9-18) (emphasis added). c 8%t olt n ich s clarification was focused on the nondissemination of the specific confidentia ' orm 'on contemplated in the documents. It certainly did not preclude a general referen to xistence. Nor does a reference to their devastating impact on MI cause of a 1 the specific information contemplated in the documents and violate this blanket o

While it ders dable that does not want the truth to be known, Epstein submits that et confidentiality order" should properly be interpreted to ensure that the docum has claimed are privileged are not used at trial or disseminated further until further order of this Court, but to permit appropriate general references to the 47 exhibits to be made in this proceeding pre-trial, in the Bankruptcy Court proceeding or in the appellate court proceedings.

ARGUMENT

General Adjective Argument is Not Disclosure

[REDACTED] examples of alleged violation fall far short of explicit disclosure. [REDACTED]

referenced the following alleged improper statements made by Epstein in court filings:

Second, the alleged eight-year-old "confidential" information to which [REDACTED] refers is 47 exhibits comprised of a series of communications between [REDACTED] and other attorneys, including Scott Rothstein, that eviscerate [REDACTED] case against Epstein in its entirety . . . Moreover, on their face, all of these eight-year-old communications clearly show that [REDACTED] claims of work product simply do not apply. These inculpatory communications cannot constitute work-product. They directly relate to issues that [REDACTED] himself has made central to this case and their content provides independent grounds to reject work product protection, including both the crime fraud exception and potential unprofessional conduct . . . the trial court refused to evaluate these issues, choosing instead to exclude the communications on the basis of what the Court believed was Epstein's untimely request to identify them on his Exhibit List. (Motion p. 12.)

Included among those issues to be perfected at the trial court is [REDACTED] errant claim of "privilege" which remains a cloud below preventing the admission of crucial evidence that Epstein maintains is dispositive of this case. That evidence must be reviewed in camera by the trial court while the appellate issues are under review. Consistent with this Court's interest in "fairness" and "efficient use of the trial court's time and resources," Epstein will be narrowing his request for in camera review down from 27,000 pages to a readily manageable fraction, 47 exhibits numbering approximately 100 pages. (Motion p. 14.)

Recent events (appeal and stay) and the discovery of e-mails that total [sic] eviscerate Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") claims and shines a light on his true motivation have prompted unprofessional behavior from [REDACTED] and his counsel evidenced by the unilateral setting of hearings, certificates of conferring that never happened and intentional ex parte attendance at a hearing despite knowing of Epstein's counsel's unavailability. (Motion p. 17.)

None of these statements evidence disclosure of the contents of any documents deems are privileged but, rather, they are made in connection with requests for judicial relief. if merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court.

In fact, the challenged statements are appropriate general statements abo nature of the documents and their impact on case — consistent with this C J t recognition in open Court that the documents are "detrimental" to case;

And I understand what you're going to tell me e gotten a flavor for some of these documents that have ided.... And that is that they are detrimental to the posit' Mr. and that they are helpful to the position Epstein.

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 51:23-52:5)(emphasis added). I j\ in s ruling prohibits general statements about the e-mails, including that they are " en " or "case-ending" to ' malicious prosecution action, even in court ir on Epstein's counsel would be prevented from advancing any argument for an review or other relief with respect to the e-mails in this Court or the appellate court o m defending himself in the Bankruptcy Court. ludicrous interpreta Court's ruling as a blanket gag order would effectively impede discharge by ein ounsel of their ethical duties to zealously advocate for Epstein. The Court's ins no express statement to justify an interpretation that would substantially interfere counsel's ethical duties in their representation of a client.

Epstein Has Fully Complied with this Court's Ruling

At most, this Court prohibited Epstein and his counsel from disseminating the specific information contemplated in the 47 exhibits improperly claims are privileged. However, Epstein has not disseminated, quoted or specifically referenced the contents of any of the 47

exhibits. Epstein's general references to the e-mails disclose nothing confidential contained therein and, therefore, fully comply with the Court's oral rulings.

bases his claims of sanctionable violations on general references to materials which, although he seeks to protect them as privileged, he never properly supported with a legally sufficient and T/G-compliant privilege log, and therefore should not be presumed to protected. Ironically, had provided a legally sufficient privilege log, based on Edw nsensical interpretation of this Court's rulings, even the limited descriptions legally r withhold the 47 exhibits contained therein would be a violation of this Court's rul eneral references to the 47 exhibits for which seeks sanctions are far c than the descriptions which was required, but failed, to provide in a I s cient privilege log.

Despite protestations to the con , Sin pstein has fully complied with the Court's rulings. It was Epstein who — witho It% n — agreed to the sealing; worked with counsel to obtain an Agreed O sea the docket entries, disc and exhibits; and then filed Notices of Compliance. Eps pt once disclosed the case-ending e-mails in the press, or to others, or, after the Marc 1 , hearing, expressly stated their content in any pleadings before this or any other cJgnoring all of this, simply seeks a gag order on the truth.

Fourth District s o A veal Denied a Similar Request from

In his ottt. to this Court, argues that no less than four times Epstein referenced the all 'lege exhibits in filings with both this Court and the appellate court. Conveniently for he neglects to disclose to this Court that he also sought to strike references to the 47 exhibits from Epstein's appellate filings on these same grounds, and the Fourth District Court of Appeal denied requested relief in both cases without even requiring Epstein to respond. See April 5, 2018, Order, Epstein v. Rothstein and , 411' DCA Case No. 4D18-0762; April

6, 2018, Order, Epstein v. Rothstein and 4th DCA Case No. 4D18-0787. (Composite Exhibit C.)

CONCLUSION

Epstein's general references in pre-trial filings with this Court and in the Fourth District Court of Appeal to the 47 exhibits in question are fully compliant with the Court's ru ings at the March 8, 2018 hearing. Epstein has not disseminated the 47 exhibits that were the t of those rulings or any of the specific information contained in those documents, ct, has taken numerous affirmative steps to ensure compliance with the Court's di and Epstein's compliance with Judge Ray's Bankrupt thF November 2010 Order is before Judge Ray as a result of separa otf efore that court. The Fourth District Court of Appeal has already denied Ed aerate motions to strike Epstein's references to the 47 exhibits based on assert ( t \*"itS a of this Court's rulings, which should dictate a similar response by this Court e ' nt motion. Furthermore, any consideration of sanctions against Epstein arisin: tein's disclosure of any allegedly attorney-client privileged and/or work-produ eted information contained in any of the 47 exhibits necessarily requires an r'on i of whether any such privilege or work-product protection actually exists, a f so, t what extent it was invaded by such disclosure. Epstein vehemently denies that cy-client privilege or work product protection applies with respect to the 47 exhibi ither this Court nor any other has ever affirmatively determined that any such privilege or protection exists. For all of these reasons, Ela Motion for Sanctions and the Intervenors' Joinder are improper and must be denied. e issue of

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on June 7, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

SER

Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boule West Palm Beach, FL 3 mep@searcylaw.co,,n isxasearcvlaw.com dvitale@searcylaw. scarolateam@searcylaw.com terrvteamaisearcylaw.com Co-C etfor Defendant/Counter-Plaint dwards ipley, P.A.

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fa]

By. Is/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scott®linlock .m Primary: Kara@lin ck1w.com Secondary: T. Iiiikrocklaw.corn Secondary: inkrocklaw.com

Trial Pounselfbr PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant ✓eITAv EQstein

Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njse,FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseicalendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J.

J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad®epllc.com Co-Counsel or J.

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.c,om Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 izoldbergerOagwpa.com smahoneyasgwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaint Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellnelaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor C i !for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

C

Jay H Jay o e Associates e Blvd., Suite 250 1 c Ile, FL 32211 h ell.com ited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

Gs'

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

AS TRANSCRIPT O

?</14:4e r

DATE TAKEN: day, March 8th, 2018 TIME: p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

(..Se !rmillie

AwiN '...) , This cause came on to be heard at the time and ace aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by:

Cos

Elaine V. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 that was not in the hands of Mr. Epstein's lawyers since 2009, whenever this all came to fruition, then I would say we'd have to take a different approach. But the very nature of the documents that we're talking about -- again, rightly or wrongly held -- were in fact held by ite, Epstein's counsel, at an incredible crud ; ti e in this process; and that being in and a 010, when the Rothstein firm imploded, these e-mails were apparently confi when somebody made the decision that in paying for the copy costs, they b a d over to . And if I h t of an incredulous tone to that stateme i s probably purposeful. A411:tr

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 But th c remains, material Mr. Link, that these in the hands of Epstein's attorneys from he inception of the issue itself. And to now the Court with not five pages of documents ok at, but 27,000, or whatever that number -- it escapes me because of its shear mass -- is impossible and is not going to be countenanced here.

23 24 25 And I understand what you're going to tell me because I've gotten a flavor for some of these documents that have been provided.

and what I think is more important than any of this, which is getting to the truth. And I believe in my heart, your Honor, the reason I'm so passionate about this and the reason I apologize for interrupting you is if this courtroom is looking for the truth, then those 49 document8 have got to come into court. They have got front of the jury.

0 THE COURT: But they're not c min in here, and I would hope elsewhere, i s going to be at the sacrifice not only as orderly administration of just also in derogation of a federal bankr urt's order or any court of recognized j tion's order that would have the necessa u rvisionary control of a given case, bu also at the potential extermination or derogation of a privilege. And for all of those why I am extremely reluctant to start g these things into consideration just a few ays prior to trial.

Again, if this was something that came into play that was being hidden by the other side, and I'm talking now generically, and your side discovered that information at the 11th hour, this would be an entirely different discussion. And

1 reasons for the Court's ruling.

2 3 4 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, may we include in the order a direction that opposing counsel is required to relinquish possession of all copies of the privileged documents to the Court under seal?

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 THE COURT: Well, the only thing that obviously has to be taken into consider i the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and h 're going to preserve those rights in igh of the fact that the Court has rejected t st minute request for in-camera inspection reasons that I've already stated at leng e record.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MR. SCAROLA: s why I've suggested that they be relinqu o the Court under seal, your Honor. The given an exhibit number. To the exte the appellate court finds it reas able and necessary to examine those ume°it\*ts, the appellate court will have the tunity to do that.

20 21 22 0 THE COURT: So you're suggesting to file with ,Ilek the Clerk of Court under seal the documents at issue?

23 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, that's correct.

24 THE COURT: That's better stated.

25 Do you have any objection?

1 2 THE COURT: Not as far as the court file is concerned.

3 4 6 7 8 9 10 MR. LINK: The court file only contains the redacted version. We have double checked that. I asked Mr. Cassell to tell me if I missed a redaction. Could it happen? Yes, it could h ppen. We haven't found one. If there was one w sn't redacted, we'd be glad to redact it. t e only thing that was filed in the clerk ejwas the redacted version.

11 Thank you, Judge.

12 AS ) \ THE COURT: All r' t hank you.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 itt S S' Much of whichr uch of the relief that has been reques h essentially been taken care lame SiCi l) of I believ r gh the Court's prior order; that e disk containing the documents that are bajng sought to be introduced at trial to take d will be permitted to be filed under seal. Cih~sanitized redacted versions of those records 'm also ordering to be sealed in an abundance of caution just in case there may be some error, not intentional, on the part of counsel who filed those records.

24 25 Mr. Epstein will be barred from referring to any of those records as it relates to the documents

that were gathered from or from any other source that would have included those records that were the subject of Judge Ray's order. So it's to preclude anything coming in through the back door which wouldn't be allowed through the front.

Mr. Link, did you want to comment o is.

MR. LINK: Yes. I wanted to rem nd Court we have over a hundred exhibits th t w re listed on that disk that are already in i court file. We've used them in deposi So I'm wondering -- those are uded.

THE COURT: m not talking about those. I'm tal g 1 out the ones that have been derived fro w r and that have been sought to be in od c d as part of the 748 or 724, or what er this number is, or the 45 that have been as privileged and have not been ruled upon ill not be ruled upon prior to trial because f the reasons that I have explained in detail earlier.

MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge.

THE COURT: Mr. Cassell, did I leave out anything else?

MR. CASSELL: Yes. We want to know how the

1 reserving on that as well.

2 3 4 MR. CASSELL: But related to that is the distribution. The cat is now wandering out of the bag, so time is of the essence.

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: Right. And again, I think that in an abundance of caution, and I understand y concerns, but what the attorneys here r iz and Mr. Epstein is also under this or is that no further dissemination is going o b made. I think that goes without sayin far as the attorneys are concerned. own each of them known Mr. Scarola ISg i Terry, Mr. Burlington, seated at counsel tabl o ny years, as I have \* Sr and I think the nize that when this Court makes a sta n that it is abundantly clear that it will e rced to the letter. I have no doubt in m mind hat they will all be respectful of the curt der of non-dissemination of any of those ents hence forth.

20 21 22 23 24 25 And Mr. Link has already represented to the Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his co-counsel, that there have been no eyes laid upon these documents. Hence, I'm accepting that representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well.

MR. CASSELL: We haven't heard, of course, from . Will the Court direct them to make similar representations?

THE COURT: I believe that I have sufficient authority to do that under these relatively peculiar circumstances. My jurisdiction, t is somewhat limited because they have w' from the case.

0 As a general blanket order I froul¢i simply say that all attorneys who have o representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject order of confidentiality, of se n d of nondissemination of a information that is contemplated in the documents that are part of the umbr 1 der of Judge Ray. And that would include 1 o he exhibits that we spoke about toda and t at have been filed as a matter of /4 :r YIZ V

MR. CASSELL: Could they also be directed to 0 ake a representation as to who they have distributed the documents to?

IcAm?k

THE COURT: Mr. Link has already -- are you talking about ?

MR. CASSELL: THE COURT: I don't think that I have that

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

/i b) S ir TRANSCRIPT OF O INGS

4 t

DATE TAKEN: sday, May 23rd, 2018 TIME: 9. 0 a.m. - 9:18 a.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge

(0.4:C v tIr

%is) lace This cause came on to be heard at the time and lace aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by:

Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995

6 7 9 Ask By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE SHIPLEY, P.A. Ir For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: &':.... is)

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant:

LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE

SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQAV

1 MR. VITALE: Good morning, Your Honor.

2 3 MS. ROCKENBACH: Good morning, Your Honor.

4 6 7 8 9 10 11 THE COURT: Good morning. We are back on a motion by to take a limited deposition of Mr. Epstein. I have read as ALI much as material as I could, including m4Rly of the transcript of the proceeding t transpired in front of Judge Ray, bankruptcy judge who did allo deposition to be taken.

12 13 And I presume it' to be taken by members of your of . Vitale.

14 MR. VITALE.q Ye sir.

15 16 A t e THE CO • o what did you need what Jud R as authorized? beyond

17 18 19 V ALE: What Judge Ray has horze is a deposition related to pstein's possession of the disc.

20 21 22 23 24 25 What we are concerned with is enforcement of Your Honor's order regarding the 724 filed exhibits that you have stricken for use at trial. Forty-seven of those, at least, are privileged documents that were listed on our privilege log since

2010.

Now through the court filings that's been made in the recent months there's been two representations.

The first representations is that Mr. Epstein, as an individual, as a witness did not review or become aware of the privileged materials until March of 2

So at a minimum, even if the already stricken, they would relevant from a probable cause det SA they could not have le robable cause 8ic to initiate the la until 2012. Von because 2009 and continue

The se n presentation that has been made is at Epstein was provided a subs of t e privileged documents which he re ' et"'ew prior to our March 5th trial

THE COURT: How much prior?

MR. VITALE: My understanding -- and I'm sure Mr. Link or Ms. Rockenbach can correct me if I'm wrong -- it would have been within weeks prior to the original March 13th trial date. He was provided a

1 subset of the documents.

2 3 4 6 7 8 Now, what we are concerned about is that although there's been representations in court filings that Mr. Epstein was ordered by this trial court to destroy the records, there's been no affidavit or .hal '14t evidence put forth that he has complied that order.

9 THE COURT: Who is he?

10 MR. VITALE: He being Mr tein, sir.

11 12 13 14 15 We do not know what 1 ed material Mr. Epstein reviewed. ot know the depth of his revie o not know who he may have shared ios rivileged materials with.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Now t make any suggestion that oppo ng counsel will knowingly put a t d-\_arty witness on the stand with vipence -- that had knowledge of our T?Ik. rivileged materials. But if Mr. Epstein gave privileged materials to the third-party witness, that could occur.

23 24 25 So what we would like to be able to do is take a very limited deposition. Mr. Epstein is already going to be in Palm

0

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Beach County. We would like to know what privileged materials he reviewed. Again, these are privileged materials that have been on our privileged log since 2010. We would like to know the timing of that review. We would like to know whether he still possesses the privileged materials whether he has complied with the Co C ur order.

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 And the reason, Your Hon s because if Mr. Epstein on the wit nd starts giving answers that go knowledge of privileged materia eed to be in a position to obj t, ve to strike. And S ome Your Honor e s o be in a position to be able to tmel rule on those objections or moti

18 19 20 ht now we simply don't know what he We don't know what privileged aterials he has.

21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: How do you see that as going beyond Judge Ray's order? In other words, essentially three areas of inquiry whether Mr. Epstein reviewed any of the documents prior to March 8th, 2018, I

1 2 3 4 6 7 believe would be encompassed in Judge Ray's order by permitting the limited deposition. Whether he did or didn't comply with the Court's order of destroying the records, would be essentially a very, very limited inquiry that may touch on Judge Ray's order allowing a limited deposition.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Did he share any privileged mate with anyone other than -- from wha recall, Mr. Link's representa -- or Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenba A(N S' Mr. Goldberger -- agai , nk is encompassed fairly 8i si , Judge (SE of allowing the 'mi d deposition. Ray's scope

15 16 17 18 So let e h r -- so is there anything else tha ou, ant to add, other than the thre areas that I've covered? Maybe I n area that you had mentioned.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. VITALE: Yes, sir. The 0 li' lk larification I would make is that those three areas, I would term them procedural. It's simply when did he review? Did he share them? What we are looking for is an ability at this trial to enforce the Court's order to ensure that nothing comes through

()emitted to use If he reviewed them, let's say, February 26th, I need to know ri he reviewed so I can underst ' answers on the stand, and Mr. Sca a I could be in M ;52, ay, a position -- or -- to object and to move to stri Judge, we took his deposit' n o une 30th, and question and answ at he reviewed and here is what to cl us he reviewed. You can see er he just gave is derived from the 'leged materials that he is not under this Court's orders. That would be --

the backdoor that isn't allowed through the front door; is to understand the substance of what exactly -- which privileged materials that he reviewed, which privileged materials he may attempt to utilize in answers to questions in an attempt to get privileged materials in through the backdoor.

THE COURT: Do we even know if he is going to testify at trial in this case?

MR. VITALE: There's been no clarification. We are proceeding as if he

1 2 will be testifying. We have been not been told definitively that he is not.

3 THE COURT: Ms. Rockenbach?

4 6 7 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. Kara Rockenbach on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Your Honor hit the nail on the head.

8 9 10 11 12 First point. There are four ACt why this court should deny Mr. Ed motion. And the first one is rely what Your Honor pointed out w ' this is a matter before the bank court.

13 14 15 16 Bankruptcy Ju e has already issued an order. And a e correct, the deposition r. Epstein is going forward to deter

17 COURT: Have you set a date yet?

18 19 20 21 22 23 LINK: Your Honor, we have nged four or five different dates. We ave six counsels, so we don't have a date But the evidentiary hearing in front of Judge Ray is in August, so the depo will take place before then, Judge.

24 THE COURT: Thanks.

25 MS. ROCKENBACH: So that's the first

1 2 3 reason why. And that alone should allow this Court to deny this request that really has no other purpose.

4 6 7 8 9 10 11 The second reason is none of the materials about which Mr. seeks to depose Mr. Epstein about have even been determined by this Court to be privileg not. We have requested an in-camera instruction of these documents. S6 there hasn't even been a determinat privilege.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Number three, -- or Vitale's stated pu the motion and then here befor ou Honor makes no sense. The purpose r t alleged justification to take Mr. is p suant n s deposition in this case to the motion that they filed to wards to identify and object to at O 1 all attempts by Epstein to utilize t ?h,, rivileged materials, these are very skilled, able trial lawyers. They know how to object. They do not need to take Mr. Epstein's deposition to determine what objections they should make at trial.

25 And the second or corollary reason that

2 3 4 5 6 7 was stated in the motion -- stated again this morning -- is they need Mr. Epstein's deposition in order for this Court to know how to rule at trial on the admissibility of evidence. Your Honor is well capable of enforcing your own orders and rulings, and so those stated reasons just have no mer'

8 9 10 11 But the last and most significan reason that is important -- becaus o t think Your Honor has seen it - if I may approach?

12 13 Mr. Link and I fik€d notices of compliance with th

14 MR. VITALE. Ma have a copy?

13 16 17 IIIIIIIO k H: e of compl' nce at Counsel referred to this morn I'm sorry. The notice

18 LINK: There are two copies there.

19 20 THE COURT: I have two copies. They not of the same thing.

21 22 MR. LINK: I think there are copies of each.

23 MS. ROCKENBACH: Sorry about that.

24 25 THE COURT: No. That's okay. I got you.

1 2 MS. ROCKENBACH: But these are the notices of compliance that we have filed.

3 4 6 Your Honor, we went above and beyond because this court has not actually entered a written order on ' motion to strike the exhibits or deemed them privileged.

7 8 THE COURT: That hasn't been before That hasn't been argued yet, has it?

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MS. ROCKENBACH: It was. It as he March 8th hearing where these bits came to light and we discussed And Your Honor made specific or gs and we detailed them in t notices of compliance. Th ws no objection filed by Mr. 4 at ver about our detailed - and we cited ,t71 the hearing transcript to be comp tely accurate with Your Honor's cn

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So there was never a requirement by 0 t?h,, our Honor that we certify compliance with the rulings. Your Honor took our word as officers of the court as to how we handled the document. And then we went further to assist and cooperate, without court order, to seal the documents and then further to

1 destroy the documents.

2 3 4 And those two notices of compliance identify -- I think there are 14 bullet points and --

6 7 8 THE COURT: So you've destroyed all the documents? What is the position being takte relative to their admissibility, some o all?

9 10 11 12 13 14 0 MS. ROCKENBACH: We are waiti g f r -- Your Honor has indicated that • are giving us special set time on, the July trial docket. And ones issues is the motion for in came determine. our Honor to

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 THE CO hat's going to be firmed up now. • I told you that I might be able o fin some time. I don't think t t's oing to happen. So somebody should out a notice of hearing that puts you 61.? S:1 41 this July 2 docket with a June 22 trial docket calendar call. It runs from July 2nd to September 7th. So do that formally so that we can get you on there formally.

24 25 MR. LINK: Your Honor, can I comment on the non-written order so the Court

1 understands what happened?

2 THE COURT: Okay.

3 4 MR. LINK: As much as I hate to raise the subject, the reason the Court didn't enter an order is because of the stay and --

6 7 MR. VITALE: Competing orders were submitted.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MR. LINK: Yeah, competing order submitted, but then the case was s aye Your Honor. So it's not as t you were not going to enter an ord ur oral rulings, but we went a d complied with your oral rulings That's why we don't have a wr ten rder, Judge.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 THE CO • don't remember I shouldn s y don't remember -- there's so lirmilv l much oing on -- this may be what you're t kin about. What I try to do with breaks C5 nnl video depos and things like that in the rial is try and go through some of this stuff and get some work done.

22 23 That's the competing orders on motion to strike Epstein's untimely supplemental

24 MR. LINK: Yes, Your Honor.

25 MS. ROCKENBACH: That's it.

THE COURT: Does the timeliness issue -- is that still -- becomes an issue or is that moot?

MS. ROCKENBACH: It's moot.

MR. VITALE: It's not moot, Your Honor. It's still an issue.

THE COURT: I guess I can enter th4,..Sio" order, but then it can be dealt with O otherwise, I presume.

C MR. LINK: Your Honor, tell you we have fully complied wi ourt's ruling, and we believe ese issues are teed up again thro Vitale's office and our office t e hearings in July. I think the C r '11 see all of these issues again at hose earings.

COURT: That was just an extra copy mission to the Court. I don't need

÷6 t MS. ROCKENBACH: So just to close, Your Honor, Judge Ray has already addressed the issue, and it is not necessary for Mr. Epstein to be deposed any broader than Judge Ray has already indicated.

And, in fact, Your Honor, as you went

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 through the three items expressed by Plaintiff's Counsel, Judge Ray is addressing that. So to have Mr. Epstein be deposed so that Counsel can determine what trail objections to make or how this Court should rule on admissibility is not the subject of a motion for a deposition or another deposition of Mr. Epstein.

9 10 11 12 0 If it is, in fact, about comp Ian e, well then, it would have been ed a motion to seek determinat er we complied with the Cour Sul ngs.

13 14 15 16 17 18 We have. And why I submitted to Your Honor the n ices of compliance which Your n r idn t request those, didn't er t ose. We did that, really, just o show our good faith in compliance w' h t re l :Ilv Court's oral rulings.

19 20 21 <4;;r So we ask that Your Honor deny the Oequest to take another deposition of Mr. Epstein.

22 THE COURT: Thank you.

23 Last word.

24 25 MR. VITALE: Yes, Your Honor. This is not an admissibility issue. We understand

1 2 3 4 that Your Honor is more than capable of determining which of the 47 privileged documents are admissible based on Your Honor's current order. They are not admissible.

6 7 8 9 10 I have no qualms -- and I'm not standing here suggesting that Mr. Link Ms. Rockenbach are going to attempt t exhibits that you have ruled are inadmissible. C tso

11 12 13 14 15 Our concern is that ein, as a party, has reviewed a s of our privileged materia < r tit ileged materials that have been on our privilege log for eight y

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Our n is that, on the witness stan in response to questions, he will knowledge that he gained from the ileged materials he has reviewed in rder to get that evidence in through the backdoor that Your Honor will not allow in through the front door.

23 24 25 The only way for Mr. Scarola or myself or Ms. Terry to properly object is to know what specific subset of privileged materials

he's reviewed so I can understand when he gives an answer, we can object and we can point you to a deposition transcript saying, Your Honor, we asked him what he reviewed. Here is what he reviewed. We asked him if he had any other knowledge of this topic outside of privileged materials, he saic4Slo" No. That testimony should be stricke the witness should be admonished.

So it's not an issue of sibility. It's our ability to ident he's reviewed to prevent th g . As Your Honor has said, th t coming in through the fro do And your Honor made it clear in 1441%: 1l ruling on March 8th that the wil not come in through the back e need to understand what he's Fr i in order to make those objections.

THE COURT: Well, based upon the fact hat there is going to be, at least from my perception and my limited exposure to these emails, a continued insistence, I will presume by Mr. Epstein, on the utilization of some of those emails; and the fact that these emails have come to light subsequent

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 to the trial court -- my orders relative to not permitting the floodgates to open and, again, with respect to discovery that should have been taken prior -- here I don't believe that's something that would be subject to that order, meaning, consistent with Judge Ray's ruling -- I too will a AhlarN Mr. Epstein to be -- on a limited bas questioned regarding his review of any of the documents in question pri March 18th or subsequentAt4s isp to the present time.

13 14 15 16 17 18 Whether or no AS h S any knowledge regarding the c ce of the Court's order regar that's n admissible at able. troying of the records, ssarily going to be trial, although I think it's

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Whether or not he shared any of the 07?6, 0 Ilegedly privileged materials with anyone other than Mr. Link, Ms. Rockenbach or Mr. Goldberger; and which, if any, materials he plans to use to testify at trial, if he so testifies, the last issue can be avoided if there is a representation on the record

based upon his review. However, absent such a stipulation, he will be compelled to answer questions as to what, if any, of those materials he plans to use, even if he doesn't have those material in his possession any longer. It would

that Mr. Epstein will not testify at any trial proceedings in this case.

0 So that would be the limited breas of inquiry that I would allow in unction with Judge Ray, and to be ent, essentially, with the S rand intent of Judge Ray's ruling 1 as a corollary to what we are ki for in this particular lative to those materials.

So, can, in preparing an order, Mr. tale, track the Court's ruling, I ld preciate it.

I wish you all a very pleasant rest of e week.

Is there anything else that's remaining, because I think there were two hearings that were set? Is there something else? This is it?

MR. LINK: I believe this is the only

one, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Thank you for your respective participation and arguments. I appreciate that very much. Thank you.

(The above proceedings were concluded at 9:18 a.m.) cos

COURT CERTIFICATE

STATE OF FLORIDA )
: SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )

I, SONJA D. [REDACTED], certify that I was
authorized to and did stenographically report the
foregoing proceedings and that the transcript is a
true record of my stenographic notes.

Dated this 31st day of May 2018.

SONJA D. [REDACTED]

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401

April 05, 2018

CASE NO.: 4D18-0762

L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Appellant / Petitioner(s)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually

J

Appellee / Responden O

ORDERED that the respondent's April 3, 2018 motiop to trike is denied.

Served:

cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach John Scar Jack Alan GolcSler J.

Nichole

dl

LON N WEISSBLUM, Clerk FourthlbitOeciit of Appeal

Philip M. Burlington Rachel Jenny Glasser

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401

April 06, 2018

CASE NO.: 4D18-0787

L.T. No.: 502009CA040800XXXMB

JEFFREY EPSTEIN

v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
J. [REDACTED], individually

Appellant / Petitioner(s)

Appellee / Respondent(s)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that the respondent, [REDACTED] April 3, 2018 "motion to strike all references to the alleged contents of material which Epstein and his counsel unlawfully possessed" is denied.

Served:

cc: Kara Berard Rockenbach
Scott J. Link
Nichole J. Segal

John Scarola
Karen Elizabeth Terry
Rachel Jenny Glasser

Marc S. Nurik
Jack Alan Goldberger
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

ct

LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk
Fourth District Court of Appeal

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa20e9c4b6b9522909df9914cc5048bb414c769d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/EFTA02767159.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 49, + "chars": 60276, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.11, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_47_Picture_17.jpeg", + "_page_48_Picture_106.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nRESPONSE \nFOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER A \nEPSTEIN'S \nSANCTIONS \nRVENORS' JOINDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 515.6624145507812, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 515.6624145507812, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 97.30799999999999, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 462.51 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018, HEAR!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Adjective Argument is Not Disclosure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 302.328, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 302.328, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein Has Fully Complied with this Court's Ruling", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 338.8551025390625, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 338.8551025390625, + 624.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 624.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District s o A veal Denied a Similar Request from", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 527.7999877929688 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 527.7999877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 390.363037109375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 390.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS TRANSCRIPT O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 402.5552062988281 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 402.5552062988281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "/i b)\nS ir \nTRANSCRIPT OF O INGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 411.8677062988281, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 411.8677062988281, + 372.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 372.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 217.0301055908203, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 217.0301055908203, + 109.83416748046875 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 109.83416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURT CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 553.5343017578125, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 553.5343017578125, + 85.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 85.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 221.3736572265625, + 268.11 + ], + [ + 221.3736572265625, + 283.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 283.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 554.472, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 54.467999999999996, + 270.54 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767159" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_47_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_47_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcb66ef42ccb14c1d6be8ece2db1887ae20c0f1c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_47_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6e599e1966178aa3db6040dcaeaef7442e3d5306c41fbf4aefc68235ac36cbc9 +size 21641 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_48_Picture_106.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_48_Picture_106.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0bbdf5ff74797452f3333554ca55aced30903be0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767159/_page_48_Picture_106.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:36686029488b7cc12bba873f3bfdd37d495b1aba699f724de6fa251fd6abf4de +size 20504 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcadc85d7d855bc57c378fd71ec963abd4980305 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.md @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXX/vIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTE in ividually, + +J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +( a`O + +# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO ri l IOIV \*CIDUCF,S TECUM Ihst + +Defendant. + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attorneys will take the Video Deposition Duces Tecum of: DATE AND TIME LOCATION + +## NAME AND ADDRESS + +Jeffrey Epsteirk + +0 + +Sunday, July 29, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. or immediately following the video deposition duces tecum of Jeffrey Epstein in the In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. USDC Bankruptcy Court matter scheduled for July 29, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. + +Videographer: Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 + +# \*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +## DUCES TECUM\* + +privilege was asserted by or on behalf °FM All communications and all records relating to all communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a ,esitgicf oe + +upon oral examination before Palm Beach Reporting, Inc., a ry bdc; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Flori te examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for As ge urposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +\*"Documents" shall in ,tide, b4Ctnot be imited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, char% photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from -which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20th day of June, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 § 5179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting (Court Reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (Videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Phil Burlington, Esq. +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] POTTINGER LLC +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] FLBN 54207 +Brittany N. [REDACTED] FLBN 118247 +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(above for address purposes only) +Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algiin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fljada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kik ed. Tanpri kontakte Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5162945ea7c62d0be1e88ec22bd88b74a41ff1ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208/EFTA02767208.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767208.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 6125, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO ri l IOIV *CIDUCF,S TECUM Ihst", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 312.4387512207031 + ], + [ + 545.5160522460938, + 312.4387512207031 + ], + [ + 545.5160522460938, + 401.22833251953125 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 401.22833251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 211.76718139648438, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 211.76718139648438, + 492.53997802734375 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 492.53997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 391.68, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 463.284, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 391.68, + 492.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF \nTHE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.18000030517578, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 546.516, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 546.516, + 104.9730224609375 + ], + [ + 72.18000030517578, + 104.9730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 357.98699951171875, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 357.98699951171875, + 135.35302734375 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 135.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 102.06 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767208" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..422bca6af27167200915f8181a8fe7cb0848035b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## RE-NOTICE OF UM + +(Cancels June 20, ng) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plain pstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before the nald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. ighway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: De t Scott Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended j C Co amt + +DAT . ly 10, 2018 + +TI . 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties represented. who may be affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on June 18, 2018, through the Court's eofJudicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the I pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +O AS + +LINK i 3 ACH, PA 155 141/ B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 I each, Florida 33401 ) -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +S is/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara©litilifocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trorglitiluocklaw.com + +> Trial Counsel for Plaintift7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

██████████ Nurik
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

██████████ Nurik
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara4ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvilida que necesita algun c m Sit 'ento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de hol tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highways-West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribun mediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo an comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted iscapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfimAti en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ?IMO okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat o gen indevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin r a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke si u gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..619ad11be71e6aafa2bd7d687a173962dc09b681 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214/EFTA02767214.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767214.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10027, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF UM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.812, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 214.812, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767214" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..693d469539bdfa0918172c96ad43c2562f20c5b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 + +June 19, 2018 + +CASE NO.: 4D18-0762 + +L.T. No.: 5802009CA040800XXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. 11.1. , individually and J. , individually + +Appellant / Petitioner(s) Appellee / Respondent(sO + +## BY ORDER OF THE COURT: + +ORDERED that the court sua sponte vacates the order entered on April 27, 2018, in its entirety. After entry of the order and upon being4advised petitioner filed a motion for rehearing of the denial of appellate fees, Judge F ed himself from the case because of matters transpiring after the order was entet. ge Kuntz was randomly assigned to the panel for this case and has fully revieweettie appellate filings and record for this case. FURTHER ORDERED that that the petition%for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. Although petitioner correctly asserted that the entire action was not "at issue" within the meaning of rule 1.440 when the prior notice for trial was filed, the trial date at issue has passed, and respondent has filed a new notice for trial; further, + +ORDERED that this Court's March 29, 2018 order staying the selling of a trial date is discharged. The trial court may set a trial date within the time set forth in rule 1.440(c) from the March 20, 2018 notice for trial. No motion for rehearing will be entertained; further, + +ORDER %in thal petitioner's March 19, 2018 request for oral argument is denied; further, - \ + +ORDERED that petitioner's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees and costs is denied; further, + +ORDERED that respondent's March 19, 2018 motion for appellate attorneys' fees is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioners May 14, 2018 motion for rehearing of denial of petitioner's motion for appellate fees and costs is denied. + +CIKLIN, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. + +Served: + +cc Kara Berard Rockenbach John Scarola Philip M. Burlington A 4 Jack Alan Goldberger Nichole J. Segal Rachel Jenny Glasser 9:4 Clerk Palm Beach Hon. Donald W. Hafele + +dl + +LON N WEISSBL UM, Clerk Fourth District Court of Appeal + +![](_page_1_Picture_6.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..afe16925c3aeff766a5fd0a6381f682f9fe5ffb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/EFTA02767218.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2130, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_6.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA \nFOURTH DISTRICT, 110 SOUTH TAMARIND AVENUE, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.11000061035156, + 73.9052734375 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 73.9052734375 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 72.11000061035156, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ORDER OF THE COURT:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.31000518798828, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 222.76799999999997, + 272.97 + ], + [ + 222.76799999999997, + 287.5520324707031 + ], + [ + 67.31000518798828, + 287.5520324707031 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767218" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/_page_1_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/_page_1_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6ef437ddc2546068f26ad6d0d7a4f592fbae709 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767218/_page_1_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d50553e31a19944127d1864446fac0005ee8b8f0c72c9eba07e2b76862c047b1 +size 19544 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b80a523547aa896b9439128e3d955fa8cf877e22 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, and L.M., Individually + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800 BAG + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DE t aCii )49BY VIDEO It + +/ + +TO: All Counsel of Record N- + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE tha reigned, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil + +Procedure 1.3101(4), will take ion of: + +NAME + +0 0 C + +CO + +C'? + +D TE !ND TIME PLACE + +Scott Rothstein FRItAY, November 19, 2010 10:00 a.m. + +Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center 7000 N.W. 41 Street Miami, Florida 33166 + +upon ora ammation before U.S. Legal Support, a Notary Public, or before some other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. + +The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes, Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbfca6c898b4a45da1f3eb5041f1811e704d79e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220/EFTA02767220.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767220.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1064, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DE t aCii )49BY VIDEO \nIt", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.139, + 367.004 + ], + [ + 435.6177978515625, + 367.004 + ], + [ + 435.6177978515625, + 383.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 168.139, + 383.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767220" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1598afa45e5473bd9ffd70284e0a813d7ed6e01d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.md @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E' MOTION TO COMPEL COUNTER-PLAINTIFF NUMBERS CED + +moves to compel Counter-Plaintiff numbers of the documents he produced in this case, and states: + +#### ODUCTION + +On the one han Edwar s argues that Epstein should not have access to or use the documents conta' on disc its current trial counsel discovered in which conta' culla p ' tely 27,542 c-mails consecutively stamped. On the other hand, c • the produced to Epstein more than 21,000 pages of e-mails that were contained on that d' . That production occurred, however, more than seven years ago in 2011 when Epstein was represented by the firm. The disc is now under seal and Epstein's request for an in camera review of 47 e-mails is currently pending before the Court. records + +has indisputably produced documents that are identified on his privilege log; specifically, the documents he produced in May 2012. Epstein, however, is unsure if produced other documents that he now claims are privileged, including the 47 exhibits which are the subject of his request for an in camera review. Because Epstein's current trial counsel did not represent Epstein in 2011, they are unable to determine which documents, in fact, we produced. Epstein's counsel have made repeated informal requests to counsel ntify the documents by number that produced, but couns ised to do so. Accordingly, Epstein respectfully moves this Court to compel Ed dentify by number the documents he produced in this case. + +## ARGUM + +has made the following representat ENT442 is production in this case: + +- March 5, 2018, M' Mptio o rike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Thab4s a Any Reference to Documents Comziiiin Privilege Materials List n Eatvards' Privilege Log (D.E. 1251). claimed that he produ a es to Epstein. + - January 25, Tanner tll Jaffe produced 8,408 pages of non-privileged l documents t + - Febru 23, Jaffe produced 12,711 pages to Epstein divided into two s tegories: 5,027 pages of "attorneys' eyes only" documents and '7 84 of "irrelevant" documents; and 7, 2012 - produced 163 pages to Epstein. +- h 8, 2018, timeline provided to the Court during a hearing (Exhibit February 23, 2011 — Jaffe produced thousands of emails to Epstein including over 5,000 where privilege had been previously claimed and was now being produced as "attorneys' eyes only." + - May 7, 2012 produced 163 pages to Epstein. +- March 19, 2018, Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause filed In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791 (Br. D.E. 6328). Jaffe + +claimed that "21.282 onesof emails have been permissibly and lawfully provided to Epstein": + +- January 25, 2011 Jaffe produced 8,408 pages of non-privileged emails to Epstein; +- February 23, 2011 Jaffe produced 12,711 pages to Epstein divided into two separate categories: 5,027 pages of "attorneys' eyes only" documents and 7,684 pages of "irrelevant" documents; and +- May 8, 2012 produced 163 pages to Epstein. + +If has already produced the 47 exhibits which are the subject of request for the Court's in camera review, then there is no work for this Court to r Epstein nor the Court, however, can make that determination based simply on Ed 0ad statements that he has not produced any documents from his privilege log. tat above, to the contrary, has produced documents from his privilege lo e ent of what he has produced, however, is unknown because Epstein's current d not represent Epstein when the documents were produced and they cannot de ils" files what was actually produced in this case. To clarify for bo tein d the Court, Epstein's counsel asked counsel on multiple occasions to number all documents that were produced. counsel, however, very request to do so. It will save the Court time and not waste judicial resources 'jtermination can first be made of what numbers, in fact, allegedl ek duced, thereby eliminating the Court's review if documents have, in fact, + +# CONCLUSION + +Accordingly, Epstein respectfully requests that the Court order number the documents he has allegedly produced in this case. to identify by + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on June 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax) + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: .tteli Primary: K.raclin kl.w.com Secondary: cklaw.com Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +r Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro [REDACTED] Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**[REDACTED] v. Epstein Timeline** + +| April 17, 2010 | Epstein propounded a broad subpoena to the Trustee for RRA as an interested party in the bankruptcy case of In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 09-34791-RBR, requesting tens of thousands of emails (the subpoena was directed to the bankruptcy trustee because the trustee was in possession of all RRA emails).

Epstein filed a Motion to Compel that production from the trustee. DE 807 | +|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| July 19, 2010 | LM (one of Epstein's victims) filed an objection and amended motion for protective order, DE 819, explaining that the emails requested were barred from disclosure based on privilege and relevance grounds. | +| August 13, 2010 | Judge Rey in the bankruptcy action entered an order regarding production of the emails to a special [REDACTED]. Judge Carney, appointed to oversee the emails produced and to prepare a privilege log. DE 888 | +| September 20, 2010 | After having received more than 27,000 emails Special [REDACTED] Carney moved for clarification of the Order, and made suggestions that LM's attorneys which included Edwards were in a better position to create a privilege log. | +| September 27, 2010 | [REDACTED] moved for protective order through counsel Jack Scarola, adopting LM's arguments for a protective order and invoking work-product privilege. DE 1022. | +| September 30, 2010 | LM joined in that DE 1022 motion and requested further clarification. DE 1038. | +| October 13, 2010 | Hearing on Motion to Clarify before Robert Carney | +| October 15, 2010 | The bankruptcy court entered an Order which clarified its earlier Order. DE 1068, requiring that the trustee provide the emails at issue to [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos Lehrman ([REDACTED] firm at the time which was representing LM) and requesting FJWEFL prepare the log. The order also provided a procedure for the special [REDACTED] to hold a hearing about assertions of privilege. Berger [REDACTED] man as counsel for the RRA Bankruptcy Trustee delivers the disc to [REDACTED] to make copies for delivery to FJWEFL to prepare privilege log. | +| October 20, 2010 | Bankruptcy court cancelled the hearing on the motion for protective order. DE 1077. | +| November 23, 2010 | Epstein files amended privilege log. | +| November 30, 2010 | Judge Ray's Order:
[T]he law firm of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with [REDACTED] numbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special [REDACTED] and an identical set to [REDACTED], who will use same to create its privilege log... [REDACTED] will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of [REDACTED] copiers. Should it be determined that [REDACTED] or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the | + +| | Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad [REDACTED] or his client. | +|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| December 16, 2010 | LM filed a motion requesting a stay of the Order directing the preparation of a privilege log until after the time when the State court ruled on the then pending Motion for Summary Judgment. DE 1236 | +| December 22, 2010 | Bankruptcy court entered an order extending the time for production of the privilege log until January 31, 2011. DE 1260 | +| January 26, 2011 | FJWEFL produced a privilege log, and the sufficiency of that log was challenged by Epstein in the bankruptcy court. DE 1442. | +| February 8, 2011 | Epstein Motion to Compel/Motion to Determine if Privilege Claims are Waived for failure to provide a privilege log. | +| February 23, 2011 | FJWEFL produced an updated privilege log (the current privilege log) detailing the emails where privilege was being maintained, and also produced thousands of emails including over 5,000 where privilege had been previously claimed and was now being produced "attorney's eyes only." Those are NOT the emails that were on the privilege log as those on the log were never turned over. | +| March 30, 2011 | Judge [REDACTED] entered an order staying the subpoena to the trustee. See Scarola's letter to Judge Carney. | +| May 27, 2011 | Order setting hearing on all motions relating to discovery and privilege issues for July 13, 2011. | +| April 7, 2011 | Letter from Scarola to Silver regarding agreement to turn 27,000 documents over to Conrad Scherer | +| April 8, 2011 | Letter from Scherer to Scarola confirming agreement regarding emails. | +| April 10, 2011 | James Silver and Scarola email confirmation of agreement to be presented to the court on April 11, 2011. | +| April 11, 2011 | Email from Brad [REDACTED] to paralegal stating: According to our agreement with Scherer, we are going to turn over "for attys eyes only" all of the emails produced to us that fall into a category requested in their duces tecum. We told them we will produce that by way of disc. I know that we have scanned in the documents that we produced to Epstein already, so those will be easy to place on disc. We need to scan those documents that have not yet been turned over into our system but first I want to review them to see if any do not fall into a requested category before scanning them in to be produced. | +| June 7, 2011 | Letter from Scherer to Jaffe regarding the copying of 27,000 emails | +| June 24, 2011 | Jonathan Castanu of Contrad & Scherer picks up the hard disk drive containing RRA emails relating to Epstein documents. | +| July 12, 2011 | Epstein's Motion for Leave to Use attorneys eyes only documents produced under confidentiality agreement. (Granted by Agreement)—Does not include privileged documents. | +| July 14, 2011 | [REDACTED] protective order granted. Epstein request for all emails is overbroad and not necessarily calculated to lead to admissible evidence. | + +| March 9, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order relating to the subpoena to the Bankruptcy Trustee | +|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| April 10, 2012 | Order requiring [redacted] to produce any non-privileged documents as identified in paragraph 13 of [redacted] Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order. (Communications with Fed. Gov't and Press) | +| April 11, 2012 | Epstein files [redacted] Privilege Log in this case. | +| April 11, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel production of documents from [redacted] and for Sanctions. | +| April 23, 2012 | [redacted] Motion to Withdraw | +| May 2, 2012 | Agreed Order on [redacted] Withdraw | +| May 7, 2012 | [redacted] produces 163 pages of additional responsive documents in compliance with April 10, 2012 Order (Communications with Fed. Gov't and press) | +| May 8, 2012 | [redacted] Order requiring better privilege log | +| May 15, 2012 | [redacted] Motion for Clarification on discovery issues. | +| May 15, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | +| May 30, 2012 | Epstein Amended Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | +| June 19, 2012 | Order Setting hearing on Motion for Clarification. | +| August 3, 2012 | Hearing on motion for clarification and discovery issues. | +| August 16, 2012 | Epstein dismisses case against [redacted] without prejudice. | +| August 17, 2012 | [redacted] grants our Motion for Clarification and vacates his 5/8/12 order and orders, inter alia, that we file an amended privilege log within 10 days. Addressing only communications between RRA and Federal Government or news reporters. | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc3ea28b44db44f19b6e50ef31aadd05bf32b2ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221/EFTA02767221.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,511 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767221.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 33303, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.55, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E' MOTION TO COMPEL \nCOUNTER-PLAINTIFF NUMBERS \nCED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 534.754638671875, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 534.754638671875, + 356.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 356.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 355.7712707519531, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 355.7712707519531, + 464.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 464.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 585.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 585.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[REDACTED] v. Epstein Timeline", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 101.25 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767221" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d81df9c252d4a8330c30f2b07d3aeb11c97c7e6b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND COUNSEL'S NOTICE OF WITBDRA TO CLERK T Y EPSTEIN'S UNSEL & DIRECTIONS FILE + +Go + +Link & Rockenbach, PA, co intif0Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to 15'h Judici • tninistrative Order 2.311-2/13, hereby gives notice that Rachel Jenny Glasser is n ongg Hated with the firm and should be removed as counsel of record for Epstein. t J. Link, Kara Berard Rockenbach, and the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, PA e with Epstein's representation. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Su 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rocken Rachel J. GI Primary: Primary: Seco S BN 44903) 7251) ocklaw.com krocklaw.corn linkrocklaw.com m + +eJ unsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein + +## RVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr Searcy, Denny, a, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Pahn B Boulevard West Pal i, FL 33409 law.com scarolateamna terryteam®searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(4FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e21de3b8bb16f51c1b084c8f5aa6655631b9bbd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230/EFTA02767230.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767230.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4512, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND \nCOUNSEL'S NOTICE OF WITBDRA \nTO CLERK T \nY EPSTEIN'S \nUNSEL & DIRECTIONS \nFILE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 508.027099609375, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 508.027099609375, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767230" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa2527d377dc647676d39ede7e772649fd19a8bc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOOavIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## RE-NOTICE OF UM + +(Cancels July 10, + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintyt le t pstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before the Ronald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. ighway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: De t Scott Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended j C Co amt + +DAT NO23, 2018 + +TI . 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties represented. who may be affected by the are self + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +O AS + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis o attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 5, 2018, through the Court's e-fili 1 pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + ++6s + +LINK i e3 ACH, PA 155 Al isti B ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 l each, Florida 33401 II) -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +is/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara©IinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plainte7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com

██████████ Nurik
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

██████████ Nurik
██████████ J. Edwards

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara4ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvilida que necesita algun c m Sit 'ento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene de hol tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highways-West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribun mediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo an comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted iscapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfimAti en akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ?IMO okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Pal h, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat o gen indevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin r a konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke si u gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e17653013a4c3f10416d7c743ff0619822e1410 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233/EFTA02767233.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767233.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10036, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF UM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.812, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 214.812, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 403.15618896484375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767233" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8d49b8df0a9f3dac1bb0e0e0cf631884fb1b92f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintifttounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## RE-NOTICE OF UNClfr\*IG (Cancels July 23, 2018, hearing in light o Court's suspension) (Rothstein's Counsel toblppear by Phone) + +A Cos + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that P • iff, at the time stated below, before Beach County Courthouse, 205 33401: ley Epstein, will call up the following hearing le Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm ixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida + +MOTION& Defendant Scott mplaint Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended + +August 1, 2018 + +8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +### LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the minion are self represented. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on July 16, 2018, through the Court's eof Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINK% ACH, PA 155 Et Si Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 each, Florida 33401 11) 8 -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +4c1clweir. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +> Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvglida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enlim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Entim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Ilighway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..134301a952bacc07b219565913d5054bf8d32b3a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237/EFTA02767237.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767237.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10699, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF UNClfr*IG \n(Cancels July 23, 2018, hearing in light o Court's suspension) \n(Rothstein's Counsel toblppear by Phone)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 468.109130859375, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 468.109130859375, + 390.363037109375 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 390.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767237" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d4edc26d4fc631428c836e2c661f739da1b28a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +### PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN ION TO DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS I NDED COMPLAINT + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") oppo t Scott Rothstein's ("Rothstein') April 11, 2018, Motion to Dismiss Second nd mplaint With Prejudice, and states: + +Rothstein has moved to Second Amended Complaint with prejudice arguing (1) that Epstein has fa t roperly plead the elements of civil conspiracy, and (2) the absence of a viable unde ort to support the conspiracy claim. Rothstein also argues that dismissal with dice is warranted because of Epstein's purportedly dilatory conduct in prosecut against Rothstein. All of Rothstein's arguments are completely unfounded and h telly no merit, and his Motion to Dismiss should be denied. + +## MtI CTION + +### ARGUMENT + +# A. The Complaint States a Claim for Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process + +It is well settled that "[a] motion to dismiss ... tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint to state a cause of action and is not intended to determine issues of ultimate fact." Landmark Funding Inc. on Behalfof Naples Syndications, LLC v. Chaluts, 213 So. 3d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (citation omitted). "To rule on a motion to dismiss, a court's gaze is limited to the four corners of the complaint, including the attachments incorporated in it, and all well pleaded allegations are taken as true." U.S. Project Mgmt., Inc. v. Parc Royale E. Dev., Inc., 861 So. 2d 74, 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). All reasonable inferences must be construed in favor of the nonmoving party. 2013). v. Shakespeare Found., Inc., 108 So. 593 (Ha. + +After nearly seven years (2,422 days or six years and seven gDonths), Rothstein belatedly surfaces for the first time through a filing which w of i ni e by Rothstein's own counsel, but was made instead by Jack Scarola, counsel or former co-Defendant and current Counter-Plaintiff, J. . No 8, nwho may have actually penned Motion in Rothstein's name, the Motio e s 's e sed on the specious argument that the operative complaint fails to properly pl the ments of civil conspiracy to commit abuse of process because Epstein does not a t horn Rothstein entered into an agreement to commit the tort of abuse of process.' thste also argues that Epstein has not adequately pled damages necessary to sustain a civ iracy claim. As is readily apparent from even a cursory review of the Second A>p4ed implaint, Rothstein's arguments have absolutely no merit and should be sununaril + +4 ents of a claim for civil conspiracy are: "(a) an agreement between two or more parties, (b) to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act by unlawful means, (c) the doing of some overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy, and (d) damage to plaintiff as a result of the acts done + +&#x27; Epstein filed the operative Second Amended Complaint on August 22, 2011. + +under the conspiracy." MP, LLC v. Sterling Holding, LLC, 231 So. 3d 517,521-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (emphasis added; citation omitted). + +Rothstein does not argue that Epstein fails to allege the core elements for civil conspiracy. Rather, Rothstein frivolously advances dismissal on the grounds that the operative complaint fails to "identify the alleged other party to the `agreement.' (Mot. at p. 2). But Rothstein ils to point to any case law — and despite an exhaustive review, the undersigned can find — which requires a plaintiff to expressly identify the co-conspirator(s) by name. • c ause Florida imposes no such requirement. Furthermore, even if the law requires a c that one or more parties other than Rothstein are involved, the operative compl • an sufficiently alleges that Rothstein did not act alone in the conspiracy. + +Nonetheless, Epstein sI alleged all the ents to adequately plead a cause of action for civil conspiracy. It is undisputed ? ts4c o , rein engaged (and had an agreement to engage) in a Ponzi scheme with othe conspiracy. For example, in the summarizes his allegations, in part: cd was damaged by the acts done by the ion" of the Second Amended Complaint, Epstein + +Through firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A "), and others in this criminal enterprise co 1.2 billion Ponzi scheme which was perpetrated with ments, forged signatures and a fundamental corruption of any legal protections that the legal system has in place. By ÷R ing to be engaged in what was essentially legal extortion, othstein persuaded investors, that he could pressure defendants, including Epstein, into paying astronomical settlements and further defrauded investors by convincing them to purchase fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements including those falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA for clients with claims against Epstein, to the detriment of the Plaintiff. . . . The United States government has stated that Rothstein conspired with others to use RRA as a criminal enterprise to conduct a racketeering activity, including mail and wire fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. + +(Second Amended Complaint, pp. 1-2) (emphasis added). + +The Second Amended Complaint also contains specific allegations of the conspiracy: + +- 36. Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as part of a plan to defraud investors and further the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knew or should have known of efforts to make illegal, improper, and perverted use of the civil process. +- 37. The actions described in paragraphs 10 through 24 through 32 constitute overt acts in further= conspiracy. + +\*44 + +- 39. As a result of the conspiracy, Epst incurring additional and unnec, costs and the cost of installin and retention of security p and to protect his grope ( S . ., damaged by omey's fees and ced security system r the safety of Epstein + +(Second Amended Complaint, yq 36, 37 ) + +In its own Complaint, the conspirators and it is an indis atter of public record and knowledge that Rothstein had guilty co-conspirators. I ere is easily ascertainable public news that at least four others pled guilty? E y alleged there was a conspiracy to engage in a Ponzi scheme between Rothstein an oth at his firm and nothing in Florida law requires Epstein to name any of these indivi anyone else - in order to civilly sue Rothstein for his criminal and destructive t alleged that others in Rothstein's firm were co- + +2 Public news sources reported that Howard Kusnick, 58, of Tamarac; Stephen Caputi, 53, of Lauderhill; William Corte, 38, of Plantation; and Curtis Renie, 38, of Fort Lauderdale, were expected to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in 2011. http://www.browardpalmbeach.comMews/scott-m\_thstein-saga-four-alleged-co-conspirators-setdates-for-guiltv-toleas-6452603. + +behavior. Epstein is not required to prove anything at the pleading stage. Nonetheless, Epstein *did* name others who were involved in the abusive litigation tactics: + +11. RRA employed a team of investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael Fisten (“Fisten”) and former Broward County Sheriff and convicted felon Ken Jenne (“Jenne”). + +12. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to [REDACTED], and routinely reported to [REDACTED] and Rothstein regarding their investigations of Epstein. + +\*\*\* + +15. In October, 2009, Rothstein directed [REDACTED] investigative team to bring case files into a conference room at RRA to be examined by potential investors. Then, Fisten and Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19) boxes. + +\*\*\* + +19. Although [REDACTED] has given sworn deposition testimony that only a few attorneys employed at RRA were directly involved in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, a privilege log prepared by Edwards, and other documents, clearly reflect that more than eighteen (18) RRA lawyers were involved in prosecuting the Epstein Actions. Additionally, four RRA investigators and several legal assistants and paralegals were involved in the Epstein Actions. + +20. On multiple occasions, and in contrast to [REDACTED] sworn testimony, many RRA attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions [described in detail in Second Amended Complaint]. + +\*\*\* + +22. Beginning in October, 2009, the level of communications by and between [REDACTED] and others, including Rothstein, described below, increased dramatically, as Rothstein was running out of money, and was in search of new victims in order to continue to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme, and coincided with Rothstein’s efforts to get the investments for + +the Epstein actions concluded [described in detail in Second Amended Complaint]. + +(Second Amended Complaint, 9911, 12, 15, 19, 20, 22.) + +In addition, Epstein alleged that Rothstein "pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for fraud and racketeering, based on an alleged \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his own pockets, and ose of his cohorts." (Second Amended Complaint, ¶ 28.) + +Based on the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, tak , and together with the inferences drawn from them in favor of Epstein, a trier of t co Id find that Rothstein and/or members of the Rothstein firm "conspired and entered press or implied agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as part of a pla ko investors and further the Ponzi scheme,"3 a finding that encompasses the firs "Ct e Aif civil conspiracy which Rothstein challenges. + +? S' Rothstein also argues that Ep t adequately pled damages necessary to sustain a civil conspiracy claim. (Mot. 3. however, did plead damages in paragraph 39, as quoted above, and in paragraph follows: + +> 34. As zresidt of the above, the Plaintiff has suffered damages by in urring additional and unnecessary attorneys' fees and sts to defend these abuses of process. + +Epstein is not required to plead those damages and a general claim is enough. Hutchison Tompkins, 259 So. 2d 129, 132-33 (Fla. 1972) ("It is well established in Florida that where the allegations of a Complaint show the invasion of a legal right, the plaintiff on the basis thereof may recover at least nominal damages, and a motion to dismiss should be overruled. ... Petitioners' failure to allege specific damages does not foreclose them from attempting to prove + +3See Second Amended Complaint at ¶ 36. + +general damages at trial. General damages, that is, those damages which naturally and necessarily flow or result from the injuries alleged, need not be specifically pleaded" (citations omitted)). Therefore, it would be inappropriate for the Court to decide damages in the context of a Motion to Dismiss. + +Importantly, when moved to dismiss Epstein's Second Amended Co plaint, this Court found that the damages alleged were sufficient to survive a Motion to Dismi ifically, in August 2011, through the same counsel who filed the instant Motion, ed to dismiss claiming, among other things, that "the [Second] Amended Co a s to articulate a cognizable theory of damages proximately caused by any wro CI in the part of J. t Motion to Dismiss, 113, Exhibit A. o ages incurred by Epstein to defend against the abuse of process alleged in th S Si., v mended Complaint are the same damages pled by Epstein to have resulted from s itsir e , s civil conspiracy. This Court previously rejected the arguments that those dama ere adequately pled and denied IM Motion. (Exhibit B.) This Court should j the same arguments, which are no more persuasive now than they were when filed ago on behalf of . + +## B. The Underlying Ili9 rt f Abuse of Process May be Discerned From the Operative Complaint + +Epstein h ed a cause of action for civil conspiracy based upon an independent tort; speciflcall to of abuse of process. In the operative Second Amended Complaint filed on August 011, Epstein alleged the underlying tort of abuse of process — both in general allegations and specific allegations against both and Rothstein. + +The elements for abuse of process are: (1) that the defendant made an illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; (2) that the defendant had ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; and (3) that, as a result of such action on the part of the defendant, the plaintiff suffered damage. S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 36 So. 3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). + +In the General Allegations of the Second Amended Complaint, Epstein alleged that in 2009, Rothstein pursued a criminal course of conduct which included a scheme to defraud investors into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured sett ements by showing them boxes of case files in the cases against Epstein, w dollar settlements were falsely claimed to have been reached by Rothstein's law fi m alf of clients. (Second Amended Complaint, ¶ 6). The purpose of the fictitious Rothstein "along with other members of RRA and others" to e law firm and raise capital.... (Second Amended Complaint, ¶ 7). Epstein pl ' a Ac ;s that "Rothstein and others ed in his firm, many of whom have pled guilty to federa ' ere pursuing this Ponzi scheme...." iei t) S Id. at ¶ 8. is was to enrich + +In fact, one need only glance at ( \*en ight paragraphs of General Allegations of the Second Amended Complaint in e the abuse of process by Rothstein and others. Rothstein employed a team of i rs, approved litigation costs of \$110,000 to \$200,000 on the Epstein actions to ad e "massive fraud" on investors, assembled "investor groups," including to rev Ep tern case files in a conference room. Id. 111, et seq. In short, the "Epstein ere being shown and touted to investors" for Rothstein to "close the deal with the in rticularly here the magnitude of the potential settlements in the Epstein Actions was a key selling point." Id. at¶25. Therefore, the elements of the tort of abuse of process can be perceived from the Second Amended Complaint. + +Rothstein also appears to argue that his illegal Ponzi-scheme activities are protected by the litigation privilege because three cases that were part of his Ponzi scheme were actual pending + +cases against Epstein. Such an argument is absurd on its face. The litigation privilege is not an absolute bar for any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding. Rather, acts that bear no relation to and are not in furtherance of the proceedings do not have immunity. Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie,M, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994); SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 70 , 710 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (nothing that a cause of action for malicious prosecution is n d by the litigation privilege). The Second Amended Complaint identifies numero ces of conduct by Rothstein outside the parameters of the litigation privilege. + +likewise raised these arguments in his Motio DI . (Exhibit A.) The Court, however, disregarded those arguments and fou i( i th e allegations in the Second Amended Complaint were sufficient to plead a \i v i c (Exhibit B.) The Court should si that the allegations are sufficient against Rothstein as well. Lion for abuse of process against + +# C. Dismissal with Prejudice ranted + +Lastly, even if for som this Court should fmd merit in the claim that the Second Amended Complaint fail e a cause of action for civil conspiracy, dismissal with prejudice would improperly Ep tein the opportunity to allege additional facts to support his cause of action, some hich should be denied only where the privilege to amend has been abused. See Gam orp. v. Steinberg, 621 So. 2d 718, 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) ("Leave to amend should be liberally given and a dismissal with prejudice is not proper unless the privilege to amend has been abused, or it is clear that the pleading cannot be amended to state a cause of action."). Here, Epstein's Second Amended Complaint was filed in response to the Court's Order granting + +Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and giving Epstein leave to amend.4 Rothstein argues that Epstein's "6 year delay in pursuing his purported claim against Rothstein" has resulted in unreasonable and undue prejudice. Rothstein, himself, however, delayed moving to dismiss or taking any action in this case during the more than six years the Second Amended Complaint was pending, although his counsel was copied on all court filings. F hermore, Rothstein did not articulate what "undue prejudice" he has suffered. + +This Court has now determined that Epstein's claims against R rtd l i claims against Epstein will be tried separately. In a case such as this ne, ore, it can hardly be found that Epstein's request to file a Third Amended ain , ould the Court grant Rothstein's Motion, would in any way be abusive. To the othstein's moving to dismiss more than six years after the Second Amended Co at w filed -- through counsel -- as a means to open issues so the claims cou ed together, is the only "abuse" that has taken place. Rothstein and s not "rewarded" for their own abusive tactics by dismissing the Second Amended ' Kith prejudice without leave to amend. + +# CONCLUSION + +Based on the fore laintiff.leffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court deny Defendant Scott kit, Motion to Dismiss. + +&#x27;While the Court granted Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, it gave Epstein leave to amend to plac vitlt more specificity. Epstein did just that and the Second Amended Complaint withstood Motion to Dismiss directed to it.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 16, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link
Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. Edwards

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com Co-Counsel or J.

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(aagwpa.com smahoneya,agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiffitounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellnelaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor C z I for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

C

n Gs'

Jay H Jay o e e ac i ?s \ 361v11. ell Associates Blvd., Suite 250 le, FL 32211 corn iced Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BRACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and
L.M., individually,.

Defendant(s).

FILED
FILED
SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK
PALM BRACH COUNTY, FL
CIRCUIT CIVIL 4

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint against him for failure to state a cause of action and in support thereof would show:

1. the "Introduction" to the Second Amended Complaint is nothing more than conclusory surplusage apparently intended to defame Mr. [REDACTED] under the protection of the litigation privilege;

2. Except for the filing of a federal complaint that did not name Epstein and was apparently never served on him,\* the Amended Complaint fails to identify the "process" alleged to be abusive, on whom it is claimed to have been served, or when it is claimed to have been served;

\*Paragraph 30(b) of the Second Amended Complaint references a federal civil action with which [REDACTED] was never served." Presumably, since the complaint is alleged to have been filed by [REDACTED], the allegation was meant to have referenced Epstein rather than [REDACTED].

[REDACTED] adv. Epstein
Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint
Case No.: 502009CA04080XXXXMBAG

3. the Amended Complaint fails to articulate a cognizable theory of damages proximately caused by any wrongdoing on the part of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

4. the Amended Complaint fails to identify any conduct outside the protection of the litigation privilege which could give rise to any liability on the part of [REDACTED] J. Edwards;

5. all legal arguments and authorities as contained in the Defendant's previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages are incorporated herein by reference.

WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] demands dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint against him.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 25th day of August, 2011.

Jack Scarola
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] adv. Epstein
[REDACTED] Motton to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

COUNSEL LIST

[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire
[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116
Phone: (617) 227-3700
Fax: (617) 338-9538

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561) 659-8300
Fax: (561) 835-8691

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos &
Lehrman, PL
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 524-2820
Fax: (954) 524-2822

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
Attorney For: Scott Rothstein
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 745-5849
Fax: (954) 745-3556

[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire
[REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A.
Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein
901 Phillips Point West
727 S Plagier Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170
Phone: (561) 802-9044
Fax: (561) 802-9976

EXHI B

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY

CIVIL DIVISION

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al.,

Defendant(s).

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, BRADLEY EDWARDS' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint served August 23, 2011. The Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response, and other Memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion. The Court has also reviewed the various authorities cited by the parties. Based upon review of the above, as well as being otherwise fully advised in the in premises, it is

CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

It is well established upon Motion to Dismiss that this Court is limited to a review of the four corners of the Complaint and the well pled allegations therein. A Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits the well pled facts in the Complaint and reasonable inferences therefrom and the allegations must be construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Applying this standard to the four corners of the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Court finds that the allegations are sufficient to plead a cause of action for "abuse of process" against the Defendant [REDACTED]. The overwhelming majority of the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss deal with the truthfulness of the allegations against the Defendant, affirmative defenses that may be available to the Defendant, [REDACTED], as well as the references outside the four corners

FILED
SALARON B. BOOK
PALM BEACH CIVIL DIVISION
CIRCUIT COURT

of the Complaint. These matters are more appropriately the subject matter of a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or defense at trial:

Based upon the foregoing, the Motion to Dismiss is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of October, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.

DAVID F. [REDACTED]
CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Copy furnished:

JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409
[REDACTED] L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Phillips Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Et. Lauderdale, FL 33301

GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Et. Lauderdale, FL 33301

[REDACTED] WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Sundak, [REDACTED] 02116

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fad63354959371a4ea32e242495fcf0d1d563b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241/EFTA02767241.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,972 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767241.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 27360, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN ION TO DEFENDANT \nSCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS I NDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.5223388671875, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.5223388671875, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MtI CTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 356.22308349609375, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 356.22308349609375, + 424.10302734375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 424.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 599.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.19775390625, + 599.4000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.19775390625, + 613.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 613.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Complaint States a Claim for Conspiracy to Commit Abuse of Process", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.97088623046875, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 489.97088623046875, + 641.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 641.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Underlying Ili9 rt f Abuse of Process May be Discerned From the Operative \nComplaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Dismissal with Prejudice ranted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 328.1895751953125, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 328.1895751953125, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 349.0532531738281, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 349.0532531738281, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BRACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.224, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 307.224, + 150.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 444.924, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 369.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 175.76999999999998 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 175.76999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.86, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 94.86, + 294.03 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767241" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c353b0e1932c4c902be66b2c052357988b326b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.md @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXKIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES Q MONS TO NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPT DUCES TECUM + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epst "), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350(b), responds and obj ces Tecum contained in Counter-Plaintiff Tecum, and states: ca,< z) 018, Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces + +### THE LIMITED ) SCOPE OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION + +On May N tti 018, e Court held a hearing on I= Motion to Permit him to Take the Limited 'ft of Epstein. (Exhibit A - Transcript). While the Court has not yet entered an Iset, it granted request to take Epstein's deposition on the following limited to : + +- Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of the alleged privileged materials prior to March 2018. (Exhibit A, 19:7-12.) +- Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of the alleged privileged materials after March 2018. (Exhibit A, 19:7-12.) + +- Whether Epstein has any knowledge regarding compliance with the Court's verbal rulings on the record at the Marc1L. 8. a 2018, hearing regarding destruction of those documents has claimed are privileged. (Exhibit A, 19:13-18.) +- Whether and to what extent Epstein has shared any of the alleged privileged materials with anyone other than his attorneys. (Exhibit A, 19:19-22.) +- Which, if any, of the alleged privileged materials Epstein plan to use to testify at trial. (Exhibit A, 19:22-20:2.) + +While the Court has allowed Epstein's limited deposition, docu g t ip very was not addressed by the parties or the Court at the hearing and, in fact, disco cry t sed. nC, + +# DUCES TECU + +Duces Tecum requests Epstein to prod y4: + +All communications and all records At all communications concerning or containing inform to eri ed from documents or data over which a claim of prjiVtIe w asserted by or on behalf of J. + +\* "Documents" shall ' I , not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings ' , graphs, charts, photographs, phonorecords, recordi any other data compilations from which information can e o fined, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the req t is directed through detection devices into reasonabl form. "Documents" also include all electronic data we as application metadata and system metadata. All in ries and rosters of your information technology (IT) .g., hardware, software and data, including but not to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or nsmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +± seeks: (1) documents that are protected by the attorney-client privilege; (2) documents that have been sealed; and (3) access to Epstein's computers and electronic devices. + +## EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION + +# A. General Response. + +Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach, PA, received the disc which is the subject of Epstein's deposition from Epstein's former counsel, , in February 2018. Epstein never received the disc nor did he know of the disc's existence before that time. + +At the March 8, 2018 hearing, this Court directed the parties to seal the no further dissemination of the documents Rockenbach, PA, took immediate steps to comply with this Court's set forth in Epstein's Notices of Compliance. The disc has b claims are currently the subject of Epstein's request that to make a determination as to whether the documen claimed were O • ensure Link & ar 18, directives as and privilege conduct an in camera review eged as claimed by + +In any event, Epstein objects to the e syecum did not obtain permission to Epstein's limited deposition. Ep and information protected by relevant to the limited iss because discovery is closed and scovery for any purpose other than to take bjects because the Duces Tecum seeks documents ey-client privilege and work product doctrine and are not e deposition. + +# B. The Due ecum Seek Privileged. Protected and Sealed Documents + +Notw mg that document discovery has not been reopened, even if the Court allow overy the scope of permissible discovery in civil cases is set by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b): + +> Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of discovery is as follows: . . . Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action[.] + +Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1) (emphasis added). + +The sweepingly broad nature of the request—all communication a II (I all records ttlatiou to all communications—inappropriately requires disclosure of documents protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine, as well as documents which have been (and remain) sealed by Order of this Court or destroyed at the Court's direction. + +Under Florida law, "[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to revent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications w ch other person learned of the communications because they were made in the ren ibijJegal services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. "The purpose of the att encourage clients to make full disclosure to their attorneys," dt, ' ...those disclosures necessary to obtain informed legal advice." Fisher v. tin' i S , 425 U.S. 391, 403 (1976). t privilege is to + +The work-product privilege is set forth in iF itlip ' i e of Civil Procedure 1.280, which s states work product is discoverable only upo , g of undue hardship and need, although mental impressions or legal opinions are ays tected: ( S it + +(4) Trial Preparat rials. Subject to the provisions of subdivision (bX rule, a party may obtain discovery of documents and tan 'be things otherwise discoverable under subdivision (b)( this rule and prepared in anticipation of liti ation trial by or for another party or by or for that e tative, including that party's attorney, consultant, nitor, insurer, or agent, only upon a showing that the discovery has need of the materials in the ration of the case and is unable without undue hardship to + in the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. ordering discovery of the materials when the required showing has been made, the court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. + +v. Harter, 152 So. 3d 705, 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(bX4) (bold/underline emphasis added). + +Here, the information requested by , on its face, is protected by both the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. While not all communications between lawyer and client are deemed privileged, a request for "all communications," as makes here, necessarily includes information that is confidential and attorney-client privileged. And, as required to assert the work product protection, at least one reason for obtaining or pr paring any such materials and data was in anticipation of this litigation or for trial. See M oft, Inc. v. Minsal, 932 So. 2d 444, 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("As there is 0 alcompetent record evidence that the incident reports in question were prepared i an i t on of foreseeable litigation, which is uncontroverted by any competent evidence con de that the trial court's finding that the reports were not protected by work pr c t r supported by the record and departs from the essential requirements of the law sdiction. The fact that there was evidence that the reports may also have bee. in order for [the defendant] to identify areas of concern does not alter this findi not eliminate the work • roduct rivile c.") (emphasis added; citation omitted Express Corp. v. CaniWay, 778 So. 2d 1052, 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) findical uments keep their work product protection even if they were prepared for an add of litigation was ason not in anticipation of litigation as long as the anticipation easons for preparing the documents). + +# C. bequest for Electronic Data is an Invasion of Epstein's Privacy and Seeks Ir Confidential and Privileged Information + +F\* y, Epstein objects to request as to "all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols." Such a + +Generally speaking, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 alto for the discovery of matters that are relevant and admissibl reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence, i electronically stored information. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.2 (bX3), 1.350 (2013); see also Fla. IL Civ. P. 1.280(d limitations on the discovery of electronically stored fo • ation). But where personal information is involved a thi ase, the trial courts' discretion to permit discove ust be balanced a • ainst the individual's corn etin • riv nterests to • revent an undue invasion of privacy." McEn 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Courts ;z adequately accounting for priva electronic storage devices. Se 3d [953,] 955 [Fla. 5th DCA inspection of a compute Menke v. Broward Cn 2005) (reversing an in a household). 981 Ky n, 44 So. 3d 245, i4rye ed rulings for not es s in the inspection of and [v. Barfield], 35 So. ( ersing an order allowing the e and cellphone SIM card); , 916 So. 2d 8, 12 (Fla. 4th DCA ing the inspection of all computers + +request is an invasion of Epstein's privacy, seeks irrelevant and confidential information, is overly broad, could result in the inadvertent disclosure of attorney-client privilege information and attorney work product, and is far outside the scope of the Court's oral ruling. + +seeks unprecedented access into Epstein's computer systems and electronic devices which in no way supports his claim for damages. As the First District has exp ained: + +> . . . privacy righ do not completely foreclose the prospect of discovery toned on electronic devices. Rather, limited and strict! cont ll inspections of information stored on electronic dev4i may permitted. See Menke, 916 So. 2d at 11 ("JRule 1-350 j broad enough to encompass requests to examine electronic information storage devices but only in limited and y controlled circumstances"); cf. v. Heart Inst. of 1Ttort St. Luck, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189, 194 (Fla. 2003) (finding that privacy rights limit compelled disclosure to that which is necessary to determine contested issues). Both Holland and Menke, for instance, would have allowed for inspections of the devices involved (computers and cellphones) if: (1) there was evidence of destruction of evidence or thwarting of discovery; (2) the device likely contained the requested information; and (3) no less intrusive means existed to obtain the requested information. Holland 35 So. 3d at 955; Menke, 916 So. 2d at 12. + +Antico v. Sindt Trucking, Inc., 148 So. 3d 163, 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (emphasis added). + +Here, access to Epstein's computer systems and electronic devices should si ql be allowed absent any evidence whatsoever that Epstein destroyed any materials (other than as directed by this Court) or thwarted discovery, and because his devices are unlikely to contain the requested information. Far less intrusive means of discovery — Epstein's limited deposition, 460.\. the , Court permitted -- should be the only discovery allowed. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to th Service List below on July 18, 2018, through the Court's e-filing po of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). listed on the uant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINK & RO 1555 Pal West P (56 a H, PA Boulevard, Suite 930 , Florida 33401 ; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +ottJ. Link + +tt J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe
██████████

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### /i b) S ir TRANSCRIPT OF O INGS + +4 t + +DATE TAKEN: sday, May 23rd, 2018 TIME: 9. 0 a.m. - 9:18 a.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +(0.4:C v tIr + +%is) lace This cause came on to be heard at the time and lace aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +6 7 9 Ask By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE SHIPLEY, P.A. Ir For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART &':.... is) + +#### APPEARANCES: + +For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQAV + +1 MR. VITALE: Good morning, Your Honor. + +2 3 MS. ROCKENBACH: Good morning, Your Honor. + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 THE COURT: Good morning. We are back on a motion by to take a limited deposition of Mr. Epstein. I have read as ALI much as material as I could, including m4Rly of the transcript of the proceeding t transpired in front of Judge Ray, bankruptcy judge who did allo deposition to be taken. + +12 13 And I presume it' to be taken by members of your of . Vitale. + +14 MR. VITALE.q Ye sir. + +15 16 A t e THE CO • o what did you need what Jud R as authorized? beyond + +17 18 19 V ALE: What Judge Ray has horze is a deposition related to pstein's possession of the disc. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 What we are concerned with is enforcement of Your Honor's order regarding the 724 filed exhibits that you have stricken for use at trial. Forty-seven of those, at least, are privileged documents that were listed on our privilege log since + +2010. + +Now through the court filings that's been made in the recent months there's been two representations. + +The first representations is that Mr. Epstein, as an individual, as a witness did not review or become aware of the privileged materials until March of 2 + +So at a minimum, even if the already stricken, they would relevant from a probable cause det SA they could not have le robable cause 8ic to initiate the la until 2012. Von because 2009 and continue + +The se n presentation that has been made is at Epstein was provided a subs of t e privileged documents which he re ' et"'ew prior to our March 5th trial + +THE COURT: How much prior? + +MR. VITALE: My understanding -- and I'm sure Mr. Link or Ms. Rockenbach can correct me if I'm wrong -- it would have been within weeks prior to the original March 13th trial date. He was provided a 1 subset of the documents. + +2 3 4 6 7 8 Now, what we are concerned about is that although there's been representations in court filings that Mr. Epstein was ordered by this trial court to destroy the records, there's been no affidavit or .hal '14t evidence put forth that he has complied that order. + +9 THE COURT: Who is he? + +10 MR. VITALE: He being Mr tein, sir. + +11 12 13 14 15 We do not know what 1 ed material Mr. Epstein reviewed. ot know the depth of his revie o not know who he may have shared ios rivileged materials with. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Now t make any suggestion that oppo ng counsel will knowingly put a t d-\_arty witness on the stand with vipence -- that had knowledge of our T?Ik. rivileged materials. But if Mr. Epstein gave privileged materials to the third-party witness, that could occur. + +23 24 25 So what we would like to be able to do is take a very limited deposition. Mr. Epstein is already going to be in Palm + +0 + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Beach County. We would like to know what privileged materials he reviewed. Again, these are privileged materials that have been on our privileged log since 2010. We would like to know the timing of that review. We would like to know whether he still possesses the privileged materials whether he has complied with the Co C ur order. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 And the reason, Your Hon s because if Mr. Epstein on the wit nd starts giving answers that go knowledge of privileged materia eed to be in a position to obj t, ve to strike. And S ome Your Honor e s o be in a position to be able to tmel rule on those objections or moti + +18 19 20 ht now we simply don't know what he We don't know what privileged aterials he has. + +21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: How do you see that as going beyond Judge Ray's order? In other words, essentially three areas of inquiry whether Mr. Epstein reviewed any of the documents prior to March 8th, 2018, I + +1 2 3 4 6 7 believe would be encompassed in Judge Ray's order by permitting the limited deposition. Whether he did or didn't comply with the Court's order of destroying the records, would be essentially a very, very limited inquiry that may touch on Judge Ray's order allowing a limited deposition. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Did he share any privileged mate with anyone other than -- from wha recall, Mr. Link's representa -- or Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenba A(N S' Mr. Goldberger -- agai , nk is encompassed fairly 8i si , Judge (SE of allowing the 'mi d deposition. Ray's scope + +15 16 17 18 So let e h r -- so is there anything else tha ou, ant to add, other than the thre areas that I've covered? Maybe I n area that you had mentioned. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. VITALE: Yes, sir. The 0 li' lk larification I would make is that those three areas, I would term them procedural. It's simply when did he review? Did he share them? What we are looking for is an ability at this trial to enforce the Court's order to ensure that nothing comes through + +()emitted to use If he reviewed them, let's say, February 26th, I need to know ri he reviewed so I can underst ' answers on the stand, and Mr. Sca a I could be in M ;52, ay, a position -- or -- to object and to move to stri Judge, we took his deposit' n o une 30th, and question and answ at he reviewed and here is what to cl us he reviewed. You can see er he just gave is derived from the 'leged materials that he is not under this Court's orders. That would be -- + +the backdoor that isn't allowed through the front door; is to understand the substance of what exactly -- which privileged materials that he reviewed, which privileged materials he may attempt to utilize in answers to questions in an attempt to get privileged materials in through the backdoor. + +THE COURT: Do we even know if he is going to testify at trial in this case? + +MR. VITALE: There's been no clarification. We are proceeding as if he + +1 2 will be testifying. We have been not been told definitively that he is not. + +3 THE COURT: Ms. Rockenbach? + +4 6 7 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. Kara Rockenbach on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Your Honor hit the nail on the head. + +8 9 10 11 12 First point. There are four ACt why this court should deny Mr. Ed motion. And the first one is rely what Your Honor pointed out w ' this is a matter before the bank court. + +13 14 15 16 Bankruptcy Ju e has already issued an order. And a e correct, the deposition r. Epstein is going forward to deter + +17 COURT: Have you set a date yet? + +18 19 20 21 22 23 LINK: Your Honor, we have nged four or five different dates. We ave six counsels, so we don't have a date But the evidentiary hearing in front of Judge Ray is in August, so the depo will take place before then, Judge. + +24 THE COURT: Thanks. + +25 MS. ROCKENBACH: So that's the first + +1 2 3 reason why. And that alone should allow this Court to deny this request that really has no other purpose. + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 The second reason is none of the materials about which Mr. seeks to depose Mr. Epstein about have even been determined by this Court to be privileg not. We have requested an in-camera instruction of these documents. S6 there hasn't even been a determinat privilege. + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Number three, -- or Vitale's stated pu the motion and then here befor ou Honor makes no sense. The purpose r t alleged justification to take Mr. is p suant n s deposition in this case to the motion that they filed to wards to identify and object to at O 1 all attempts by Epstein to utilize t ?h,, rivileged materials, these are very skilled, able trial lawyers. They know how to object. They do not need to take Mr. Epstein's deposition to determine what objections they should make at trial. + +25 And the second or corollary reason that + +2 3 4 5 6 7 was stated in the motion -- stated again this morning -- is they need Mr. Epstein's deposition in order for this Court to know how to rule at trial on the admissibility of evidence. Your Honor is well capable of enforcing your own orders and rulings, and so those stated reasons just have no mer' + +8 9 10 11 But the last and most significan reason that is important -- becaus o t think Your Honor has seen it - if I may approach? + +12 13 Mr. Link and I fik€d notices of compliance with th + +14 MR. VITALE. Ma have a copy? + +13 16 17 IIIIIIIO k H: e of compl' nce at Counsel referred to this morn I'm sorry. The notice + +18 LINK: There are two copies there. + +19 20 THE COURT: I have two copies. They not of the same thing. + +21 22 MR. LINK: I think there are copies of each. + +23 MS. ROCKENBACH: Sorry about that. + +24 25 THE COURT: No. That's okay. I got you. + +1 2 MS. ROCKENBACH: But these are the notices of compliance that we have filed. + +3 4 6 Your Honor, we went above and beyond because this court has not actually entered a written order on ' motion to strike the exhibits or deemed them privileged. + +7 8 THE COURT: That hasn't been before That hasn't been argued yet, has it? + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MS. ROCKENBACH: It was. It as he March 8th hearing where these bits came to light and we discussed And Your Honor made specific or gs and we detailed them in t notices of compliance. Th ws no objection filed by Mr. 4 at ver about our detailed - and we cited ,t71 the hearing transcript to be comp tely accurate with Your Honor's cn + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So there was never a requirement by 0 t?h,, our Honor that we certify compliance with the rulings. Your Honor took our word as officers of the court as to how we handled the document. And then we went further to assist and cooperate, without court order, to seal the documents and then further to + +1 destroy the documents. + +2 3 4 And those two notices of compliance identify -- I think there are 14 bullet points and -- + +6 7 8 THE COURT: So you've destroyed all the documents? What is the position being takte relative to their admissibility, some o all? + +9 10 11 12 13 14 0 MS. ROCKENBACH: We are waiti g f r -- Your Honor has indicated that • are giving us special set time on, the July trial docket. And ones issues is the motion for in came determine. our Honor to + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 THE CO hat's going to be firmed up now. • I told you that I might be able o fin some time. I don't think t t's oing to happen. So somebody should out a notice of hearing that puts you 61.? S:1 41 this July 2 docket with a June 22 trial docket calendar call. It runs from July 2nd to September 7th. So do that formally so that we can get you on there formally. + +24 25 MR. LINK: Your Honor, can I comment on the non-written order so the Court + +1 understands what happened? + +2 THE COURT: Okay. + +3 4 MR. LINK: As much as I hate to raise the subject, the reason the Court didn't enter an order is because of the stay and -- + +6 7 MR. VITALE: Competing orders were submitted. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MR. LINK: Yeah, competing order submitted, but then the case was s aye Your Honor. So it's not as t you were not going to enter an ord ur oral rulings, but we went a d complied with your oral rulings That's why we don't have a wr ten rder, Judge. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 THE CO • don't remember I shouldn s y don't remember -- there's so lirmilv l much oing on -- this may be what you're t kin about. What I try to do with breaks C5 nnl video depos and things like that in the rial is try and go through some of this stuff and get some work done. + +22 23 That's the competing orders on motion to strike Epstein's untimely supplemental + +24 MR. LINK: Yes, Your Honor. + +25 MS. ROCKENBACH: That's it. + +THE COURT: Does the timeliness issue -- is that still -- becomes an issue or is that moot? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: It's moot. + +MR. VITALE: It's not moot, Your Honor. It's still an issue. + +THE COURT: I guess I can enter th4,..Sio" order, but then it can be dealt with O otherwise, I presume. + +C MR. LINK: Your Honor, tell you we have fully complied wi ourt's ruling, and we believe ese issues are teed up again thro Vitale's office and our office t e hearings in July. I think the C r '11 see all of these issues again at hose earings. + +COURT: That was just an extra copy mission to the Court. I don't need + +÷6 t MS. ROCKENBACH: So just to close, Your Honor, Judge Ray has already addressed the issue, and it is not necessary for Mr. Epstein to be deposed any broader than Judge Ray has already indicated. + +And, in fact, Your Honor, as you went + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 through the three items expressed by Plaintiff's Counsel, Judge Ray is addressing that. So to have Mr. Epstein be deposed so that Counsel can determine what trail objections to make or how this Court should rule on admissibility is not the subject of a motion for a deposition or another deposition of Mr. Epstein. + +9 10 11 12 0 If it is, in fact, about comp Ian e, well then, it would have been ed a motion to seek determinat er we complied with the Cour Sul ngs. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 We have. And why I submitted to Your Honor the n ices of compliance which Your n r idn t request those, didn't er t ose. We did that, really, just o show our good faith in compliance w' h t re l :Ilv Court's oral rulings. + +19 20 21 <4;;r So we ask that Your Honor deny the Oequest to take another deposition of Mr. Epstein. + +22 THE COURT: Thank you. + +23 Last word. + +24 25 MR. VITALE: Yes, Your Honor. This is not an admissibility issue. We understand + +1 2 3 4 that Your Honor is more than capable of determining which of the 47 privileged documents are admissible based on Your Honor's current order. They are not admissible. + +6 7 8 9 10 I have no qualms -- and I'm not standing here suggesting that Mr. Link Ms. Rockenbach are going to attempt t exhibits that you have ruled are inadmissible. C tso + +11 12 13 14 15 Our concern is that ein, as a party, has reviewed a s of our privileged materia < r tit ileged materials that have been on our privilege log for eight y + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Our n is that, on the witness stan in response to questions, he will knowledge that he gained from the ileged materials he has reviewed in rder to get that evidence in through the backdoor that Your Honor will not allow in through the front door. + +23 24 25 The only way for Mr. Scarola or myself or Ms. Terry to properly object is to know what specific subset of privileged materials + +he's reviewed so I can understand when he gives an answer, we can object and we can point you to a deposition transcript saying, Your Honor, we asked him what he reviewed. Here is what he reviewed. We asked him if he had any other knowledge of this topic outside of privileged materials, he saic4Slo" No. That testimony should be stricke the witness should be admonished. + +So it's not an issue of sibility. It's our ability to ident he's reviewed to prevent th g . As Your Honor has said, th t coming in through the fro do And your Honor made it clear in 1441%: 1l ruling on March 8th that the wil not come in through the back e need to understand what he's Fr i in order to make those objections. + +THE COURT: Well, based upon the fact hat there is going to be, at least from my perception and my limited exposure to these emails, a continued insistence, I will presume by Mr. Epstein, on the utilization of some of those emails; and the fact that these emails have come to light subsequent + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 to the trial court -- my orders relative to not permitting the floodgates to open and, again, with respect to discovery that should have been taken prior -- here I don't believe that's something that would be subject to that order, meaning, consistent with Judge Ray's ruling -- I too will a AhlarN Mr. Epstein to be -- on a limited bas questioned regarding his review of any of the documents in question pri March 18th or subsequentAt4s isp to the present time. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 Whether or no AS h S any knowledge regarding the c ce of the Court's order regar that's n admissible at able. troying of the records, ssarily going to be trial, although I think it's + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Whether or not he shared any of the 07?6, 0 Ilegedly privileged materials with anyone other than Mr. Link, Ms. Rockenbach or Mr. Goldberger; and which, if any, materials he plans to use to testify at trial, if he so testifies, the last issue can be avoided if there is a representation on the record + +based upon his review. However, absent such a stipulation, he will be compelled to answer questions as to what, if any, of those materials he plans to use, even if he doesn't have those material in his possession any longer. It would + +that Mr. Epstein will not testify at any trial proceedings in this case. + +0 So that would be the limited breas of inquiry that I would allow in unction with Judge Ray, and to be ent, essentially, with the S rand intent of Judge Ray's ruling 1 as a corollary to what we are ki for in this particular lative to those materials. + +So, can, in preparing an order, Mr. tale, track the Court's ruling, I ld preciate it. + +I wish you all a very pleasant rest of e week. + +Is there anything else that's remaining, because I think there were two hearings that were set? Is there something else? This is it? + +MR. LINK: I believe this is the only + +one, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: Thank you for your respective participation and arguments. I appreciate that very much. Thank you. + +(The above proceedings were concluded at 9:18 a.m.) cos + +COURT CERTIFICATE + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) +: SS +COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) + +I, SONJA D. [REDACTED], certify that I was +authorized to and did stenographically report the +foregoing proceedings and that the transcript is a +true record of my stenographic notes. + +Dated this 31st day of May 2018. + +SONJA D. [REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b36fabdcc5d435efb791e4cccc9edd7dbb99c834 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260/EFTA02767260.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1390 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767260.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 31, + "chars": 37798, + "elapsed_seconds": 12.23, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSES Q MONS TO \nNOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPT DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.80352783203125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 471.80352783203125, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE LIMITED ) SCOPE OF EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 450.3152160644531, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 450.3152160644531, + 491.60302734375 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 491.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECU", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.864, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 309.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 288.864, + 309.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 424.1714172363281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 424.1714172363281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. General Response.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 206.8502197265625, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 206.8502197265625, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Due ecum Seek Privileged. Protected and Sealed Documents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 459.2455749511719, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 459.2455749511719, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. bequest for Electronic Data is an Invasion of Epstein's Privacy and Seeks \nIr Confidential and Privileged Information", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 569.2330169677734 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 569.2330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 252.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 252.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "/i b)\nS ir \nTRANSCRIPT OF O INGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 411.8677062988281, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 411.8677062988281, + 372.8331298828125 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 372.8331298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 217.0301055908203, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 217.0301055908203, + 109.83416748046875 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 109.83416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURT CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767260" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d5b61040a2a70377ab49930bb4da48fa49cbbcf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.md @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. ps + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT LIST AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT 7T • EXHIBIT LIST + +J al by undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Defendant J A t y ."E ein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List and Supplement thereto, and as runc a therefor states as follows: + +### Delay, Delay, Delay + +When the Court peels back the layers of Defendant Epstein's attempt to drastically alter his Exhibit List, it will be left with a rather basic question: How far will the Defendant be permitted to go in his efforts to avoid a trial of this nearly nine (9) year old case? + +On November 1, 2017, the law firm of Link & Rockenbach entered its appearance in this case as trial counsel on behalf of Epstein. At the time, this case was set to begin trial on December 5, 2017, and the parties had already exchanged exhibit and witness lists pursuant to the Court's Order Specially Setting Trial, which was entered on July 20, 2017. i + +Two days later, on November 3, 2017, filed his Objections to Epstein's Trial Exhibits. + +On November 6, 2017, Epstein filed his Motion to Continue the December 5, 2017 special set trial. In the Motion to Continue, Epstein made the following representation to the Court and the parties: + +Following the Court's clear and unambiguous advice at the October 3, 2017, hearing to fortify lead counsel in the preparation and defense of his claim, on October 13, 2017, Plaintiff retained new trial counsel, who appeared in the case on November I, 2017. Plaintiff also retained a team of lawyers from the Gunster law firm as trial support. None of the things Plaintiff is asking for in this Motion is based on lack of manpower. Even using all of these resources, there is still not enough time to get everything that is needed done before the December 5, 2017, trial date. Importantly, Plaintiff and his trial counsel w not seek another continuance. We will be ready to try the case in 90 da + +(Emphasis added). Based in part on this representation, anted the Motion to Continue and reset this case for a special set trial on March 1 + +Despite the representation that it woul 5, 2017 all-day hearing, Plaintiff and his y further continuances, at the December I asked the Court to indefinitely stay this case pending resolution of the Crime Victim's Rtgltts Act Proceeding in federal court. The Court denied / Epstein's Motion for Temporary L Stay of Proceedings on the record, and the corresponding order was entered on December 28, 2017. / - + +Yet, on Mareb 5, 2018, after the parties had taken up a considerable amount of the Court's resources for multi-day special set hearings and other matters, Epstein once again sought to avoid trial by Nang a Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket, based on a hyper-technical argument that the case was not "at issue" under Rule 1.440. In what was in all likelihood a first in this Judicial Circuit, Epstein did not assert that malicious prosecution claim was not at issue. Rather, Epstein argued that his claim against Scott Rothstein, an uncollectible defendant in federal prison, + +was not at issue as a result of Epstein's own dilatory conduct in failing to know what pleading was pending against Rothstein and failing to know whether a default had been entered. + +At the hearing on March 8, 2018, Epstein's trial counsel nonetheless repeatedly claimed that they were "excited" to try this case, and, in fact, represented to the Court repeatedly that they were "ready to try the case" on March 13, 2018. See 3/8/18 Hr'g Tr. at 14:13-14. HoWever, when given the option to waive any technical argument under Rule 1.440, they O • t do so: + +> MR. LINK: Thank you. I know Mr. Scarola said they're excite to try the case, believe me, Judge are really excited to try the case. The evidence that we rece discovered — + +THE COURT: Then waive the te ty. f you are so excited about it 1 w e the technicality. + +MR. LINK: I won't do t, Ju + +3/8/18 Hearing Tr. at 49:8-17. + +Although Epstein's tria counse would not waive the technically, they did represent to the Court that, if the Court Were-to remove the case from the trial docket and deny of the v. Epstein counterclaim and the Epstein v. Rothstein claim, they were prepared to have a default judgment entered against Rothstein that day and would be remain "ready" to try this case within 50 da a, or by April 27, 2018: + +MS. ROCKENBACH: I have an order for the Court to sign to enter a default. Served it on Mr. Rothstein's counsel of record, Marc Nurik. And we will then be ready once this Court enters the default, and presumably either party notices it for trial in 20 days when it is then at issue, this Court can then set it no less 30 days. 3/8/18 Hearing Tr. at 11, 6-14. + +At the end of the oral argument on Epstein's Motion to Remove Case From Trial Docket, undersigned counsel warned that the hyper-technical argument being raised with regard to Rule 1.440 was merely a ploy to reopen discovery and delay this case once again by, among other things, attempting to invalidate the Court's July 20, 2017 pre-trial order: + +MR. SCAROLA: The defense, in violation of this Court's order, last week listed 724 new exhibits they want to use. And they are going to use this hyper technicality to say the pretrial order was invalid because the case was not at issue; a new pretrial order needs to be issued; discovery is not yet closed; we have an opportunity to proceed with additional discovery; and we can amend our exhibit list, and we can include 724 new exhibits, and more w\eh they say we are still finding. + +3/8/18 Hearing Tr. at 65:24 to 66:10. + +And, now here we are. After repr would be ready to try this case on M# 018, after representing to the Court on March 8, 2018 that they were ready to try the on March 13, 2018 but for a hyper-technical "at issue" argument, and after representing to the Court that they would be ready to try the case by April 27, 2018 (as long as Roth\_ claim was not severed, of course), When one reviews the timeline and conflicting representations made above, Epstein's strategy becomes quite clear. 'rig \' the Court in November 2017 that Epstein + +If Epstein is permitted to amend his exhibit list to add exhibits that were publicly available years before trial counsel entered its appearance in this case, the parties will necessarily be required to take additional discovery to cure the resulting prejudice to who disclosed his witness and exhibit list, and prepared to try this nearly decade old case, without the burden of + +dealing with these newly listed exhibits.' Epstein's decision to omit these exhibits from his prior lists (as required by the Court's pre-trial order and by the Court's oral pronouncements at the December 5, 2017 hearing that all exhibits were to be disclosed and this case would not be tried by ambush) was the tactical choice made by Epstein's lengthy series of prior lawyers. Every single proposed exhibit was available to Epstein prior to the Court-ordered deadline' on exhibit disclosures. No manufactured continuances can change that fact, and permitting Epstein to use untimely exhibits at trial would substantially prejudice AccOrclifigly, ) the Court should deny Epstein's motion and supplement thereto. + +## Argument + +## I. The Court's Orders Are Clear: The Dta • e o Amend Exhibit Lists Has Long Since Passed. + +First, it is M' position that the Court's Order Specially Setting Trial, entered on July 20, 2017,3 is valid. The parties have been °Pawing under that Order for over a year, and as recently as the March 8, 2018 hearing, Epstems,thiough counsel, represented that he would be ready to try this case by no later than Apri1V-2, 018. In making that representation, Epstein's counsel never raised any issue reg• ding e alidity of the pre-trial order and Epstein is estopped from raising any such arg . See Clinic, LLP v. Verzosa, 816 So. 2d 832, 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (id the elements of equitable estoppel). And, even if the doctrine of equitable estoppel i4not apply, the representation by Epstein's counsel that they were ready to try this case on April 27, 2018, without the necessity of a new pre-trial order, is clearly a waiver of what is + +2 The same is true for Epstein's renewed request to disclose an "expert" witness, Skip • been denied by this Court. a request that has already + +3 A copy of the Court's Order Specially Setting Trial is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. + +nothing more than another hyper-technical argument. Les Goodwin v. Blu Ins. Agency Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ("The elements of waiver are: (1) the existence at the time of the waiver of a right, privilege, advantage, or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right."). + +Moreover, Epstein has already tried unsuccessfully (twice) to reopen pretrial illeadlines to 2"—Thi allow the amendment of his Exhibit List. First, on November 27, 2017, the ntered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines and Re Pretri 1 i 4, in which this Court rejected Epstein's request to push the pretrial deadlines th arch 13, 2018 trial date. The Court explicitly stated that any attempt to seek addif very (or, presumably, to alter the reconfirmed pretrial deadlines), would be perm the moving party could show that the request was "impacted by the Court's ru \*titiso i otions currently pending to be heard on November 28, December Viand Dece 7th. + +Over the last nine (9) monthow Court has made clear that it meant what it said: all pretrial r al deadlines have passed. In fact, Epstein' ttempted to unilaterally amend his Exhibit List on March 5, 2018, and the Court grOoted motion to strike the untimely exhibits at issue. urges the Court lathe interest of justice to continue upholding its July 20, 2017 and November 27, 2017 orders. Discovery is closed. Pretrial deadlines have passed. Both parties have represented on the record they have been ready to try this case since March 8, 2018, and the Court should require thparties to stick to their word. + +4 A copy of the Court's November 20, 2017 Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 'B'. + +## II. The Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation Does Not Permit Amendment in Violation of This Court's Orders. + +Epstein's reliance on the Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation is a classic example of trying to have your cake and eat it too. Epstein tells this Court that the Order Specially Setting Trial, entered on July 20, 2017, is invalid. See Mot. at p. 5 ("There is no trial order in place."). Yet, E in attempts to rely upon the Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation that was entered pursuant to the v order he claims is invalid. The Court should not permit this sort of double-sided + +In any event, at the December 5, 2017 hearing, the Court ed that any identified exhibits not previously produced must be provided to opposi by no later than December 19, 2017. See. e.g., 12/5/17 Tr. at 225:21-226:4. The C t 'd utioned that general "catch-all" exhibit categories would not be permitted and list , the specific documents covered by such exhibits must be separately identified In compliance with this Order, rout certain exhibits related to the Crime Victim's d. See. e.g., 12/5/17 Tr. at 223:11- 225:14. Rights Act case that had previously been included within a now stricken "catch-all" exhibit category. + +On December 22, 2917, Epstein and filed their Joint Pretrial Stipulation, in which the parties reserved their "right to amend their Exhibit Lists." Obviously, the right of either party to amend their Exhibit List is subject to the discretion of the Court, particularly given the Court's December 5th ruling that trial by ambush would not be permitted, that all exhibits were to have been disclosed by December 19, 2017, and that general "catch-all" categories were explicitly prohibited. See City of Opa Locka v. O, 901 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005 (amendment should have been permitted where the pretrial stipulation at issue agreed that the parties could + +amend "without leave of court" for up to 30 days before trial). In fact, when Epstein attempted to unilaterally amend his exhibit list prior to the March 13, 2018 trial date, the Court struck the additional exhibits as untimely and in violation of this Court's repeated orders regarding the timeframe in which exhibits were to be disclosed. Epstein has cited to no authority that would permit the parties' pre-trial stipulation to override a trial court's orders, and Edwards respectfully suggests that no such authority exists. Thus, the Court should uphold its prior ruling denying Epstein leave to amend his exhibit list beyond the pretrial deadline. + +# Would Be Severely Prejudiced by The Proposed Amendment. + +Epstein seeks to amend his Exhibit List to include/the following categories of documents, all of which were available to Epstein for years prior to the Court's deadline to disclose trial exhibits: (1) Exhibits from production in this case; (2) Public records related to L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe; (3) Public records related to a 2015 case involving and Alan Dershowitz; (4) Publicly available information regarding on his law firm's website; (5) Publicly available information regarding property records; and (6) Publicly available information related ii to the Crime Victim's Rights Act case, to which Epstein has intervened. These documents could have been listed Epstein's original exhibit list, and the only reason they weren't is because Epstein's pn se chose not to do so. Now, Epstein's trial counsel seeks a "do-over" so that, rather as trial counsel on the eve of trial to actually try the case, they can reopen discovery and start from scratch. Binger, however, does not permit Epstein to do so. + +Epstein correctly notes that the Court should not permit Epstein to amend his exhibit list if the proposed amendment would prejudice See, e.g. Mot. at 6 (chkgt Tomlinson- + +McKenzie v. Prince, 718 So. 2d 394, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Binger). As the Fourth DCA aptly stated in Tomlinson-McKenzie: + +The objecting party is prejudiced by the admission of such evidence if the party might have taken some action to protect itself had it had timely notice of the witness or exhibit, and there exists no other alternatives to alleviate the prejudice. The supreme court, in Binger, stated that + +Prejudice in this sense refers to the surprise in fact of the objecting party, and it is not dependent on the adverse nature of the testimony. Other factors which may enter into the trial court's exercise of discretion are: (i) the objecting party's ability to cure the prejudice or, ... [its] independent knowledge of the existence of the witness; (ii) the calling party's possible intentional, or bad faith, noncompliance with the pretrial order; and (iii) the, possible disruption of the orderly and efficient trial of the case (or other cas + +718 So. 2d at 396 (emphasis added). + +Agsb / s' + +Obviously, had known that Ep te Nte Yed to utilize these publicly available exhibits, he would have altered his pretriat`rate i by taking additional depositions, serving Jr-, altered discovery requests, by identifyiitany necessary rebuttal witnesses as permitted by the Court's Order Specially Setting a\*Order at p. 1 (rebuttal witnesses to be disclosed ten days .', ,\_ C after the exchange of the parties ;bit lists), and would have challenged the admissibility of the newly listed exhibit in a s ie of motions in limine. The now second attempt to amend Epstein's exhibit list wo therefore cause significant prejudice to and would in all likelihood necessitat eopening i of discovery and further extensive delays in the eventual trial of this case. Of course, can be seen from the timeline laid out in the beginning of this response, that is clearly Epstein's ultimate goal. + +Moreover, the Tomlinson-McKenzie court, following Binger, identifies as an important factor whether the moving party either intentionally or in bad-faith failed to comply with the trial + +court's pre-trial order. Epstein attempts to circumvent this factor by playing a game of bait and switch as to who is bound by the Court's pretrial deadlines and whose bad-faith or intentional violation is at issue: + +Epstein's current counsel had not been retained when the Court entered its July 20, 2017 Order Specially Setting Trial. . . The request to amend is not made in bad faith but, rather, is necessitated by the change in the scope and focus of the trial as determined in December 2017. Epstein's new counsel took steps in good faith after that hearing to reevaluate all evidence compiled to determine how to best defend Epstein's case and determined an amended to Epstein's exhibit list was warranted. + +Mot. at 7-8. + +Whether Epstein's current counsel attempted to comply with the Court's pre-trial order is irrelevant. The question is whether Epstein, through his prior counsel, complied with the pre-trial order in good faith. And, the answer to that, question is `Yes'. Epstein filed his Exhibit List in advance of the October 6, 2017 deadline for exhibit list disclosures. All that has happened since then is that Epstein retained new trial counsel, on the eve of trial, to try a case that had been worked up for years. It is abundantly clear that Epstein's new trial counsel is dissatisfied with the way in which Epstein's prior counsel prepared the defense of this case. They want a do-over, and the repeated attempts to amend 'Epstein's exhibit list are nothing more than thinly-disguised requests for the Court to bail Epstein out for what his new trial counsel sees as an imperfect defense strategy. The Courfrhawever, has made abundantly clear at recent hearings that both parties are responsible for the way this case was worked up over the past nine (9) years. Therefore, given the substantial prejudice to and the fact that every single proposed new exhibit was available to Epstein well in advance of the Court-ordered deadline for exhibit disclosures, requests that the Court deny Epstein's now second attempt to amend his Exhibit List. respectfully + +to all Counsel on the attached list, this I q day of July, 2018. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve Acti.LAII + ++o + +JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 KAREN E. TERRY" V Florida Bar No.: 45780J DAVID P. VITALS) ri Florida Bar No.: 115(79 Attorney E-MailE jsx®searcylaw.com; and nunccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Amend Exhibit List. + +### Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff deny Epstein's request to amend his Exhibit List. respectfully requests that the Court + +O + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +S SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +### ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TRIAL + +THIS CAUSE camaSigs this court Plaintiff, M=' J. ', Motion Court's Motion to Determine Need for Disc the court having reviewed the Motion, fully advised in the premises, it is her o t it? 6, 2017 on Counteret Cause for Trial and the tion Scheduling Order and gument and being otherwise + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that his case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., (10 days reserved) in Courtroom 10C, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. + +## H. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL the parties shall exchange list's of all trial exhibits, names and addresses of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses4c all expert witnesses. +- B. On t s last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL the parties shall exel hi .. lan fists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - I. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + +![](_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg) + +## Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and +- 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. + +D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, the parties shall confer and: + +- I. discuss settlement; +- 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; +- 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; +- 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. + +E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the, counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by coy el for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARINSOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith ation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + +- I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubert Motions must be.beard 20 days before the start of the trial. +- 2. stipulated facts which re \* no'oof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; +- 3. a statement of all issues-Of for determination at trial; +- 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Sfipulation; +- 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal wipeses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulafionr-77 +- 6. a statement Of estimated trial time; +- 7. nett n- i of attorneys to try case; +- 8. beFlof peremptory challenges per party; and party's proposed jury instructions and verdict form, with citations to oiling authority, as schedules attached to the Stipulation. + +F. Fl G OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. + +G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. + +**H. DISCOVERY. Unless permitted by court order, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR TRIAL. ABSENT A TRUE EMERGENCY, FAILURE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR CONTINUANCE.** + +1. I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pre-trial conference. +2. J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to trial, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +3. K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +4. L. PREMARKING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. +5. M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than trial, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +### **III. MEDIATION** + +A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + +1. 1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. +2. 2. At least **ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE**, all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. +3. 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. +4. 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), unless waived. + +B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (f), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall be paid \$175.00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. + +C. Completion of mediation prior to trial is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate in mediation, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings may be stricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. + +D. Any party opposing mediation may proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1,700(b). + +### **IV. NONCOMPLIANCE** + +**NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING OF THE CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER SANCTIONS AS ARE JUST.** + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 20th day of July, 2017. + +![](_page_16_Picture_3.jpeg) + +JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +### Copies furnished to: + +- C Andrew A. Harris (aah@iflappellatelaw.com) +- Mik James (brad@pathtojustice.com) +- Fred Haddad (haddadfm@aol.com) +- John Scarola (mep@searcylaw.com) f WA.OKFI . rvlAN@F 2. HIIE COM) +- Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com +- Matthew D Weissing (matk§pathtojustice. +- PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB©r TELAW.COM) 1.7 service©jurytrial.co Russell S. ce©jurytrial.com) +- Tonja Haddad Coleman to ©tonj addad.com) F William Bennett. (wbk@arcylaw.com) +- William Chester Brewe cblaw@aol.com) +- William B. ckingteam©searcylaw.com) +- John Scar,ota Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) Rodney 0 Romano (alex@matrixmediation.com) +- John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com) +- Fred Haddad (Dee@fredhaddadlaw.com) James B Chaplin (efile©mediationfirminc.com) Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling©tonjahaddad.com) +- Fred Haddad (fredhaddad@fredhaddadlaw.com) + +O S + +Order Specially Setting Jury Trial + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- fJ JaymeM Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) F John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) +- Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com) +- Andrew A Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.com) +- Philip M Burlington (kbt@flappellatelawcom) +- Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com) F Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) F (staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +- W ChesterIM- Jr (wcblawasst@gmail.com) + +O 'S "C/49 P) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +![](_page_18_Picture_29.jpeg) + +ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES +AND RE PRETRIAL STIPULATION + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO +RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and +being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Than the motion is granted to the +14 form that wholesale additional discovery will not be +permitted but individual discovery requests may be allowed on a +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27 + +day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()\* Matter by matter basis and only if the discovery requests are +imparted by the courts rulings on motions currently +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. +pending to be heard on Nov. 29, Dec. 6 & 7, 17. Form pre- +trial stipulation shall be prepared and filed no later than +June December 15, 17. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fc14a9f30201f76dd85e1655a5c05ed93ac2053 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/EFTA02767291.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1129 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 32548, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.59, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg", + "_page_16_Picture_3.jpeg", + "_page_18_Picture_29.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO \nALLOW AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT LIST AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO \nALLOW AMENDMENT 7T \u2022 EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 532.4932250976562, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 532.4932250976562, + 364.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 364.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Delay, Delay, Delay", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 358.87762451171875, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 358.87762451171875, + 472.10302734375 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 472.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.684, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 338.1119079589844, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 338.1119079589844, + 334.10302734375 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 334.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. The Court's Orders Are Clear: The Dta \u2022 e o Amend Exhibit Lists Has Long \nSince Passed.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 545.7465209960938, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 545.7465209960938, + 375.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 375.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. The Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation Does Not Permit Amendment in Violation of This \nCourt's Orders.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.964, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 547.123046875, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 547.123046875, + 126.363037109375 + ], + [ + 89.964, + 126.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Would Be Severely Prejudiced by The Proposed Amendment.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 496.4666442871094, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 496.4666442871094, + 305.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 305.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 340.76495361328125, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 340.76495361328125, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.9399871826172, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 479.808, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 479.808, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 132.9399871826172, + 110.16000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.3199920654297, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 432.68399999999997, + 307.33355712890625 + ], + [ + 174.3199920654297, + 307.33355712890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 481.3335266113281 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 481.3335266113281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Specially Setting Jury Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 98.103515625 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 98.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. DISCOVERY. Unless permitted by court order, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR TRIAL . ABSENT A TRUE EMERGENCY, FAILURE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR CONTINUANCE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 532.4399999999999, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 294.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 162.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NONCOMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 595.3499999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.36000061035156, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 179.928, + 253.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 76.36000061035156, + 253.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES AND RE PRETRIAL STIPULATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.144, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 504.9, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 99.144, + 384.75 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767291" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f96b120eddfe7612c92d9c89f26357d418d8dee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c74efab68e7b031092bebe1d0ba4075de79ad3aa126cb3b827c4c62c9c242d3f +size 8178 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_16_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_16_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e4d1d3802d014bee214e2011846af557265e106 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_16_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3b09daa5f92c300a62b1078bffa9dba04506a7f34c6f4010825fbcdc2f47e090 +size 10534 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_18_Picture_29.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_18_Picture_29.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d1820609d4b24f41e59433ae18ac023489c479a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767291/_page_18_Picture_29.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:76c604a001fbaf426830281a789a03e40c16cf536419ae09f622d496b9246608 +size 7879 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d12799edce9453f9c39549e8f908fa19d879815 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.md @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO IDENTIFY HIS TRIAL WITNESSES + +Plaintiff, \_ J. EMI by and lidersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Defendant Je 's Motion to Compel to Identify His Trial Witnesses, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +# Epstein's Sta : rd dofor Admissibility of Witness Testimony + +7 + +Although Epstein's Mo ncems the disclosure of trial witnesses, he spend much of his time arguing about issibility of potential witness testimony in this malicious prosecution case. uig so, Epstein concedes that the standard for the admissibility of witness testimony in Iltis cJse is as follows: + +[U]nless listed witnesses have personal knowledge of the matter at issue and can sneak to what Epstein believed when he filed suit against the witnesses' testimony would be irrelevant and collateral, and thus, inadmissible, even for purposes of impeachment. + +Mot. at p. 14 (emphasis added). + +Thus, admissibility will turn on whether any proffered witness has personal knowledge of facts relevant to Epstein's probable cause to file the December 7, 2009 Complaint. As the Court has recognized at prior hearings, the issue of Epstein's probable cause is determined in part by the allegations contained within the Complaint Epstein filed against Therefo as Epstein concedes, will be permitted to put forth witnesses who have person le e of facts and circumstances tending to prove whether Epstein knew that the alle the Complaint were false at the time he made them. In this context, both direct ancicirclhmstantial evidence of what Epstein knew will be compelling proof of what Epste + +Examples of relevant allegations include: + +| Allegation | pleihneWitness Testimony Admissible at | +|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| | .." A , ,2.- A Trial | +| ¶ 35: I I relentless and | knowingly | +| took place | y | +| | 14....) /I | +| ¶ 42(h) I I knew or n- | :1 have known Value of Each Case (Compensatory Damages) | +| that [his] three (3) filed cases | 'ere weak and had | +| ¶ 42(e) After was recruited and joined | Any person who has personal knowledge of the | + +being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bite rich such as the July 31, 2009 transcript when stated to the Court in EW/LM: "What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as our investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which, I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children . . . and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls. + +Cos + +In his Complaint, Epstein relied I t.,hes !legationsand others to support his "probable cause" that was engaging-inabus litigation tactics for the "sole purpose of continuing 7 • / the massive Ponzi scheme." Complaint at ¶ 30. Thus, as Epstein concedes, is entitled to meet his heavy burden of proof regarding Epstein's lack of probable cause by putting forth witnesses who have ersonal knowledge that, at the time Epstein made the above allegations (and y others) in therUPIecb1nber 7, 2009 Complaint, he knew they were false. Epstein knew that was purring the flight logs because Epstein had in fact molested underage children on planes. Epstein knew that was seeking millions and millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of L.M, E.W., and Jane Doe because Epstein had molested them, had used them to recruit other children for molestation, and had molested dozens and dozens + +of other children. Epstein knew the potential value of the compensatory and punitive damage claims was enormous. And he knew that MI' claim that Epstein had been molesting children for over a decade was not made to pump some Ponzi scheme, it was made because it was true. Epstein cannot have probable cause to make these allegations if he knew they Were false at the time he made them. + +Accordingly, although the parties disagree on many issues in this do agree as to the standard for admissibility of witness testimony on the issue of kobaljle cause. And it is the standard laid out by Epstein in his current motion. + +# Has Already Disclosed His Trial Witnesses bOtenuired by the Court's Orders + +On July 20, 2017, the Court entered its Order Specially Setting Trial (the "Pre-Trial Order"). In the Pre-Trial Order, the Court ordered\ that the parties were to exchange the "names and addresses of all trial witnesses" ilier"names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses." Contrary to Epstein's suggestio of each witness's testimony. o requirement that the parties identify the subject matter + +Although Ep tein ains that MI' Witness List contains 169 witnesses', Epstein neglects to tell that has broken those witnesses out to clearly identify who is most like ly be called at trial. did so pursuant to an order of the Court after Epstein eviously complained about the breadth of Witness List. Specifically, ' Witness List now identifies 27 witnesses under the heading + +I Obviously, is required to list any potential witnesses to avoid having waived his ability to call them at trial. + +"Expected to be Called at Trial" and 142 witnesses under the heading "May Be Called if the Need Arises." Of course, has filed nine (9) witness lists and four (4) rebuttal witness lists since this case began in 2009. Many of the witnesses contained on M' Witness List were disclosed on those prior versions, which gave Epstein ample time to take any depositioni, he deemed ---ri necessary in preparing this case. Epstein chose not to do so, a litigation decitn 'that has its pros and cons, none of which are , or the Court's, problem. 146.) / + +Although Epstein complains at length about the "unneces cessive, abusive, and deliberately misleading" nature of Witness List, own Witness List identifies 58 witnesses and 9 rebuttal witnesses, yet does not b v14/ witnesses out to identify which et witnesses are "expected to be called" compared t ' Nnesses only "may be called if the need arises." has raised no issue with tein 'Witness List because undersigned counsel meant what he said on March 8, 2018;SE is ready to try this case that has now been pending for 3,146 days. The parties had years td take discovery and to take any depositions that they believed were necessary to the preparation of this case. Epstein's counsel also announced to the Court at the March 8, 2018/hearing that they were ready to try this case. The Court should hold them to their word, and dismiss this claimed "prejudice" argument for what it is: another attempt to engage in endless motion practice and to delay the trial in this case until the twelfth of never. + +#### If Epstein Believes None of the Witnesses Have Admissible Testimony, He Has Nothing to Worry About + +Epstein's Motion claims that "[m]ost of the listed witnesses have no personal knowledge concerning malicious prosecution claim against Epstein or Epstein's + +probable cause for filing and continuing his proceeding against Mot. at p. 1. If that is true, and it must be Epstein's position because he neglected to take any depositions of the witnesses he complains of, then Epstein has nothing to worry about. Surely, this Court is not going to permit to present witnesses with no personal relevant knowledge. It is therefore hard to understand Epstein's claim of prejudice. + +Finally, Epstein's request for to disclose a detailed summary of the substance of each witness's testimony is nothing more than an attempt to itundersigned counsel's mental impressions and make up for what Epstein's current perceives to be inadequacies in the pretrial conduct of Epstein's prior counsel. Unde t sel's trial strategy is absolutely protected by Florida's work-product privilege, 's attempt to invade that privilege to cure any purported defect in the defense's pp rati of this case should be rejected. 50 Northup v. Acken, 865 So. 2d 1267, 1270 (Fla ersonal views of the attorneys as to how and when to present evidence, his evaluation l relative importance, his knowledge of which witness will give certain testimony . . . come within the general category of work product.") (emphasis added). + +## Conclusion + +For the for4oing reasons, Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify His Trial Witnesses should be denied. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve 4Ato all Counsel on the attached list, this ( t day of 2 8. + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. Bar No.: 16944 OLA CO SA I F Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): js ylaw.com and mmccann@searcyla . Primary E-Mail: Scan, a am@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 ttorneys for J. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel [REDACTED] to Identify His Trial Witnesses + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1eb93aa6168ac500ca451c0ad79649f72dd8fe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310/EFTA02767310.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,457 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767310.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 11194, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO \nCOMPEL TO IDENTIFY HIS TRIAL WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 534.4790649414062, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 534.4790649414062, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 348.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Sta : rd dofor Admissibility of Witness Testimony", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 155.448, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 458.70733642578125, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 458.70733642578125, + 458.1330261230469 + ], + [ + 155.448, + 458.1330261230469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Has Already Disclosed His Trial Witnesses bOtenuired by the Court's Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 536.7547607421875, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 536.7547607421875, + 347.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 347.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "If Epstein Believes None of the Witnesses Have Admissible Testimony, He Has Nothing to \nWorry About", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 578.34 + ], + [ + 539.2169189453125, + 578.34 + ], + [ + 539.2169189453125, + 607.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 607.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.848, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 340.0149841308594, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 340.0149841308594, + 538.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 277.848, + 538.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 238 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767310" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..133cfefb4b1e279cd7f90eba3adfbf460d39ddbc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.md @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +Tecum of: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +coS + +# OS) RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the un 4=1 attorneys will take the Video Deposition Duces + +'S ) + +### NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME + +1 r\* + +August 17, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. or immediately following the video deposition duces tecum of Jeffrey Epstein in the In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. USDC Bankruptcy Court matter scheduled for August 17, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. + +Videographer: Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +## LOCATION + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 + +# \*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +# DUCES TECUM\* + +All communications and all records relating to all communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a privilege was asserted by or on behalf of ,M. (ThAS f + +upon oral examination before Palm Beach Reporting, Inc., a lc; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida.: I examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or forsA ich8ipe urposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +\*"Documents" shall in ud< ,ec4Ciali t not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charfsp hotographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data / acompilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also ineludesall electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 20 day of July, 2018. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting (Court Reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (Videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Phil Burlington, Esq. +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] POTTINGER LLC +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] FLBN 54207 +Brittany N. [REDACTED] FLBN 118247 +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(above for address purposes only) +Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algiin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted ti e discapacitaciem del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san on pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kik id. Tanpri kontakte Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parit nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w parit nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblim pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4be817ba4d75064c07a772646d8c1d617022273 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319/EFTA02767319.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767319.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 6105, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "OS)\nRE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.804, + 315.01904296875 + ], + [ + 482.9903869628906, + 315.01904296875 + ], + [ + 482.9903869628906, + 359.60302734375 + ], + [ + 132.804, + 359.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 340.90570068359375, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 340.90570068359375, + 487.10302734375 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 487.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 391.068, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 462.2987060546875, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 462.2987060546875, + 487.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 391.068, + 487.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF \nTHE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 545.5618896484375, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 545.5618896484375, + 107.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 107.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.73699951171875, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.73699951171875, + 137.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 137.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 103.68 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767319" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e33b8664e4f28de20f13436721e55487d9c69c5e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.md @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +\_EN + +#### RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNPS + +Plaintiff, J. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +#### Binger Does Not Penqjt a Party to Ignore Trial Court Orders + +In this and other motions, Epstein relies on the Supreme Court's decision in Binger to argue that Epstein should be permitted to ignore this Court's pre-trial orders, as long as there is no prejudice to Edwards. This interpretation of Binger is wrong and is an affront to the authority of a trial court to control its docket. Epstein has already tried, once, to belatedly add Mr. as a purporteileexpert" witness well after the Court's deadline to disclose witnesses. The Court denied that request by order dated January 17, 2018. + +And, although Epstein relies on Binger and its related cases, this is not a situation where Epstein only recently discovered the existence of this new witness or the relevance of his + +"expert" testimony. See Tomlinson-McKenzie v. Prince, 718 So. 2d 394, 396 (Ha. 4th DCA 1998) ("There was no finding that appellants failed to comply with the pretrial order in bad faith. The record reflects that appellants moved to amend the witness and exhibit list as soon as the surveillance tape became available.") (emphasis added). Rather, the issu bout which Epstein seeks to have Mr. testify have been known to Epstein and ensue team of defense lawyers for years. Those attorneys made the tactical decision n t an expert in this case, and for eight (8) years prepared his case in reliance tlt decision. If the Court were to permit Mr. to be added as a witness, this w Id be further delayed by the reopening of discovery, the taking of Mr. de p' d likely having to retain /...' one or more rebuttal experts, assuming Est \ in oul be able to overcome multiple legal 7 challenges to the admissibility of Mr. Santblkop ions. Daubert/Fabre challenges are likely. Admissibility hinges on the extent t gal opinions invade the province of the Court to i decide probable cause as a matt rbf rior assertions of Fifth Amendment and Attorney-Client privileges present foundational H)enges. + +Enough. The part' re ready to try this case on March 13, 2018. At the March 8, 2018 hearing, counsel for NM repeatedly stated on the record that they were ready to try this case, which has4 \_pending for 3,146 days. Any further delay in the trial of this matter severely prejudicNa, who is entitled to his day in court to clear his name in connection with the malicious lawsuit Epstein filed on December 7, 2009. And as the delays continue, is denied access to the only effective antidote to the poison that Epstein created and spread to intentionally destroy reputation. + +In addition to the foregoing, has included below a slightly revised version of his prior-filed Response in Opposition to Epstein's original Motion for Leave to Disclosure Expert Witness: + +### The Renewed Motion Fails to Meet the Court's Requirements to Reonen,Dikcovery + +1. On November 27, 2017, the Court entered its Order on M to tconfirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines, in which the Court ruled that additi 'very will only be permitted if "the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's lin on motions currently pending to be heard on November 29'h, December 6th and 7th. hearing preceding the Order, the Court outlined the standard by which any su el \ t al discovery requests would be considered: + +> 4 - So what I am going to do is 't . Because there are issues that need to be addressed -- and I'm hoping I will have orders out as soon as possible after those hearings are done-- is that I am going to require motions to be filed on a discovery issue-by-discovery issue, deposition by deposition, so as to find out several things. One, is the need to take that deposition and whether that need has been either clarified or required by virtue of a court order that will be entered subsequently to the commencement of Wednesday's hearings and thereafter on those days that I provided. If it cannot be demonstrated to the Court that these witnesses need to be taken solely as a result the Court's ruling, then those requests will be denied, because, again, we were set to try the case next week. + +> So 20 some-odd deposition, unless they can be proven and shown to the Court as being required as a result of the rulings of the Court, will not be entertained. They should have been done before. And if not done before, I will need a reason for that as well. + +11/27/2017 Hearing Tr. at 12:11-25 and 13:1-6, 17-23. + +2. Thus, Epstein must establish that D. Culver III's (a) proposed expert testimony is required solely, as a result of a recent Court ruling. Epstein's renewed motion, like the prior motion that was denied by the Court, clearly fails to meet this requirement, and therefore the renewed motion should be denied. + +- A. The "Legal Ethics and Responsibility" Related to the Discovery Conducted in the L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Cases Has Been at Issue Since 2009. + +3. The first category of proposed expert tes ton is "legal ethics and responsibility," regarding the legitimacy of the discovery nducted in his clients' sexual molestation cases. + +4. Obviously, the propriety of this ch ery as been challenged by Epstein since • December 7, 2009, when Epstein filed this malicious lawsuit claiming, inter alia, that he had somehow been damaged by '3 litigation conduct in those cases (despite the absolute N litigation privilege). In fact, the Coateea t look no further than Epstein's 'Summary of Action' in the Complaint, which includes e following allegations: + +Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers . . . at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A., for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations to the administrative of justice . . . conductledl egregious civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious iniury to Jeffrey Epstein . . . The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil litigation strategy that was unrelated to the merits or value of their clients' cases . . . As a result, Epstein was subject to abusive investigatory tactics, unprincipled media attacks, and unsupportable legal filings.. . . + +5. Specific allegations concerning a purported litigation misconduct are replete throughout the December 7, 2009 Complaint. See, e.g., ¶ 35 (alleged improper pursuit of + +flight logs); ¶ 36 (alleged improper depositions of pilots); ¶ 38 (alleged improper scheduling of depositions of well-known figures). + +6. Thus, any purported expert testimony concerning litigation strategy and conduct in the three victims' cases (assuming it has any relevance in, light of the litigation privilege) has been challenged by Epstein since 2009. No recent (tiling of the Court has impacted in any way on this subject matter so as to give rise to a previously Unrecognized need for expert testimony, and would be highly prejudiced in hiving\_to depose at this juncture and reopen discovery in a case that has been ready foorial since March 2018. ./•• + +## B. Epstein Has Been on Notice of the Attorney Witnesses Since 2010. + +7. To the extent is intended to rebut testimony offered by the unretained and unpaid attorney witnesses who may provide expert opinion as to the propriety of and justification for litigation conduct in t lin'nde r I ying • victim cases, Epstein has been aware of intent to call these witnes§eyince at least 2010. + +8. Specifically, EclOrardS witness lists over the years have included the following disclosures: + +# a. June 30. 2010 (Witness List) + +"All attorneys currently prosecuting claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims." + +## b. June 25. 2013 (Witness List) + +"All attorneys currently prosecution claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims" and "Robert Josefsberg, Esquire" + +## c. September 27. 2013 (Amended Expert Witness List) + +> "Experts include enlisted attorneys involved in the prosecution of civil claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females. They will testify based upon their background, training and experience as civil litigators and the personal involvement that each had in prosecuting claims against Jeffrey iaabout the legal and ethi propriety of the actions taken by in fulfilling obligations to the victims of Epstein's criminal assaults" + +### d. January 6.2014 (Amended and Supplemental Witness Li + +"All attorneys currently prosecution claims against stein on behalf of other victims" S "Robert Josefs uire + +"Experts include all listed witnesses involv claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising minor fe prosecution of civil in's serial abuse of + +## e. January 6, 2014 (Amended Expe ist) + +"Experts include all listed 14 tii e volved in the prosecution of civil claims against Jeffrey Sin sing out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females. They based upon their background, training and experience as civil d the personal involvement that each had in prosecuting c st Jeffrey la about the legal and ethical propriety o ons taken by in fulfilling the obligati o the victims of Epstein's criminal assaults." + +## f. August 15.%016 (Second Amended and Supplemental Witness List) + +A÷"Experts include all listed witnesses involved in the prosecution of civil claims against Jeffrey Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minor females." + +meys currently prosecution claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of other victims" and "Robert Josefsberg, Esquire" + +9. The attorneys who were obviously known to Epstein since the day he was served with civil complaints, were nevertheless individually named in subsequent witness lists. There can + +therefore be no claim that Epstein was not aware that these witnesses were expected to testify, and he has had years to take discovery related to their expected testimony. Tellingly, he as never attempted to depose even one of them. + +#### C. Whether Probable Cause Existed (an Issue in This Case Since at Least 2011) is a Question of Law for the Court. + +10. Absent a disputed material fact, whether Epstein had prob cvse to initiate or continue his claims against is an issue of law to be determi Court. + +11. Florida law is clear: "An expert should not to ed to testify concerning questions of law." Edward J. Seibert, Architect & .A. v. Bayport Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n, Inc., 573 So. 2d 889, 892 (Fla. 2d DCA ,9,6:12/ 9 ng Devin v. City of Hollywood, 351 So. 2d 1022, 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Thutt:'ini4i's purported opinions on whether probable cause existed are improper and irrelevantf) + +12. And, again, whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to initiate and continue his \ malicious claims against Edwards has been an issue in this case for years, and specifically pled a count for malicious prosecution in his Amended Counterclaim (October 4, 2011), Second Amended Counterclaim (November 29, 2011), Third Amended Counterclaim (May 21, 2012) and Fourth Amended Counterclaim (January 9, 2013). + +-13T-=\_Epstein therefore had, at a minimum, six (6) years to take discovery on the issue of probable cause prior to the discovery deadline on November 24, 2017. Any prejudice for his failure to do so is therefore entirely self-inflicted. + +## D. Has Pled Reputational Damages in Every Counterclaim in this Case. + +14. Epstein has been on notice of reputational damages claim since December 21, 2009, when filed his initial counterclaim. Moreover, reputational damages were pled in the Malicious Prosecution counts in Amended Counterclaim (October 4, 2011), Second Amended Counterclaim (November 29, 2011), Third Amended Cottclaim (May 21, 2012) and Fourth Amended Counterclaim (January 9, 2013). + +e 15. Any discovery related to this issue could, and should, t conducted years ago. Once again, any claimed prejudice is entirely self-inflicted. + +#### Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, Epstein's Renewed 14i/din for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness should be denied. + +( S \ + +r + +C + +— + +II ZPIIIV + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2017 day of July, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +InEladv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA0408007JOCXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness + +#### COUNSEL LIST + +Esquire stafflefile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +4. 4.sc + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire - 9 v njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppel \s m Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +Scott J. Link, Esquire z Eservice@linkrocklaw.corm Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach F3akes Boulevard Suite 301 West Pa h, FL 33401 Phone: (56L)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1125b7c045fdd08c6461f5b81b58bff8d3797642 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325/EFTA02767325.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,717 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767325.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 14553, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO \nDISCLOSE EXPERT WITNPS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 534.4478149414062, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 534.4478149414062, + 351.7330627441406 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 351.7330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Binger Does Not Penqjt a Party to Ignore Trial Court Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 465.958251953125, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 465.958251953125, + 459.363037109375 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 459.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Renewed Motion Fails to Meet the Court's Requirements to Reonen,Dikcovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.024, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 523.8184814453125, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 523.8184814453125, + 212.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.024, + 212.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein Has Been on Notice of the Attorney Witnesses Since 2010.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 488.0473937988281, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 488.0473937988281, + 349.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 107.71199999999999, + 349.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. June 30. 2010 (Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 288.2391662597656, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 288.2391662597656, + 541.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 541.8630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. June 25. 2013 (Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 288.6773681640625, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 288.6773681640625, + 610.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 610.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. September 27. 2013 (Amended Expert Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 662.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 402.23919677734375, + 662.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 402.23919677734375, + 678.3630142211914 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 678.3630142211914 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. January 6.2014 (Amended and Supplemental Witness Li", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 254.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 254.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. January 6, 2014 (Amended Expe ist)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 382.18292236328125, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 382.18292236328125, + 378.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 378.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f. August 15.%016 (Second Amended and Supplemental Witness List)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 478.473876953125, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 478.473876953125, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Whether Probable Cause Existed (an Issue in This Case Since at Least 2011) \nis a Question of Law for the Court.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 546.516, + 196.82999999999998 + ], + [ + 546.516, + 226.10302734375 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 226.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Has Pled Reputational Damages in Every Counterclaim in this Case.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 648.8100000000001 + ], + [ + 545.213134765625, + 648.8100000000001 + ], + [ + 545.213134765625, + 665.2330017089844 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 665.2330017089844 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.012, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 339.64495849609375, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 339.64495849609375, + 322.863037109375 + ], + [ + 276.012, + 322.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.8399658203125, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 131.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 262.8399658203125, + 131.2230224609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767325" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee85f92f04b3e718ff3c7a6c5bdaed1e9cb704e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. ME, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +Counter-plaintiff, J. ED DSS oyes this Honorable Court for entry of an Order granting him leave to assert a la punitive damages against the Counter-defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and in su ptrt RSeeooff would show that the record evidence presented to the Court in support of prerequisites for the sert n bf a punitive damage claim. Specifically, the evidence establishes that EPSTEIN' m int against Motion for Summary Judgment satisfies the statutory + +- I. +- 1. fled in the total absence of evidence to support any allegation of wrongdoing on the part of la +- 2. was filed in the total absence of evidence that EPSTEIN had sustained damage as a consequence of any misconduct other than his own well-established criminal enterprise; + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXISIBAG Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages + +- 3. was filed in the absence of any intention to meet his own obligation to provide relevant and material discovery; +- 4. was filed for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate both M= and "d\_ clients and others into abandoning their legitim plain\* against EPSTEIN. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the fore fias been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, t y of October 2010. + +O) + +a r No.: 169440 enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley aim Beach Lakes Boulevard st Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (56l 383-9451 Attorney for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 727-2423 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53e289e108916838f36c883f217ed03fbc32cd19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336/EFTA02767336.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767336.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2634, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.109, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 115.728515625 + ], + [ + 305.109, + 115.728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO \nASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.696, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 516.3651733398438, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 516.3651733398438, + 375.9785461425781 + ], + [ + 87.696, + 375.9785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.739, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 347.739, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767336" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6436ac463250350daac44d152a882151d063c0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.md @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMI3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCO-17 ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S T (Adds Item No. 22) OCKET + +O + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case is c Zn the Court's trial docket for August 2 and 3. 2018, before The Honorable Donal le, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beacon urtroom 10D, on the following matters: + +| No. | Motion/Request | | +|-----|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | +| 1 | 10/5/17 | Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against [REDACTED] and His Counsel [D.E. 1009] | +| 2 | 11/13/17 | Edwards' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1051] | +| | 11/17/17 | Edwards' Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1077] | +| 3 | 12/4/17 | Edwards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V only; Section I addressed at 12/7/17 hearing) [D.E. 1100 and 1101]
[Heard on 12/7/17, but not completed] | +| | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege [D.E. 1102 and 1103] | +| 4 | 12/11/17 | [REDACTED] Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1113] | +| 5 | 12/22/17
1/25/18
2/22/18
3/7/18 | Objections to Deposition Designations [D.E. 1130, 1159, 1222, 1260] | + +| No. | Date | Motion/Request | +|-----|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 6 | 1/10/18 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Liminc of Unrelated Settlements | +| | | — Motion was denied as to three clients on 2/28/18, but Court | +| 7 | 1/18/18 | Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit No. 132 | +| 8 | 2/1/18 | Epstein's Motion in Limine on Newly Disclosed Trial E ibits and | +| | | to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Who Were Not sed in this Matter [D.E. 1176] | +| 9 | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice [D.E. 1178] | +| 10 | 2/12/18 | Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Des" i on i f pstein's | +| | | Disclosure of Confidential Settlement Information E. 6] | +| 11 | 2/26/18 | Motion to Compel Request for A on E. 1225] | +| 12 | 3/2/18 | Motion in Limine to Limit the trY on of Evidence Alleged to | +| | | Support Epstein's Claims Against Ed 1243] | +| 13 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Motion for Court's Pen ter Trial Evidence to Comply | +| 14 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Motion for Cou erm ton to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing | +| | | Names with Initials of wa ' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] | +| 15 | 3/5/18 | Epstein's Motion Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature | +| | | of Documents t for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary | +| | | and Appoin ent o ecial [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] | +| | 4/4/18 | Epstein's Supp ement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to | +| | | P ilegtnd Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents | +| | | .13 9] | +| | 45 | Supplemental Authority [D.E. 1320] | +| 16 | | Motion to Change Case Caption [D.E. 1305] | +| 17 | 3/2 18 | Epstein's Motion to Address Scheduling and Professionalism [D.E. 1309] | +| 18 | 4/3/18 4/6/18 | | +| 19 | 4/27/18 | Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List [D.E. 1334]; Supplement [D.E. 1341] | +| 20 | 4/29/18 | Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness [D.E. 1335] | +| 21 | 5/2/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify his Trial Witnesses [D.E. 1338] | + +| No. | Motion/Request | | +|-----|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | +| 22 | 6/21/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel [REDACTED] to Identify [REDACTED] Numbers of Documents Produced [D.E. 1350] | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 24, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED] | Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appeara ce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvidida que necesita algun ac "ento pan poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene der0i si ener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la am ilida de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Wes I'm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo ii no 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunal i I diatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo ant omparecencia que se ha S programado a menos de 7 dias; si usted apacitacion del oido o de la voz, flame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kon ameriken ki Enfim yo na Highway, West Palm Bea jou anvan dat ou ge apre ou fin res mwens ke 7 te.) eo ; e akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan enn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou my Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou al Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie lorida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 "levou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman nvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28d9b4fa390e755092391e0e3f93ae09226e67f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339/EFTA02767339.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767339.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 15088, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S T \n(Adds Item No. 22) \nOCKET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 489.478759765625, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 489.478759765625, + 315.7330627441406 + ], + [ + 123.01200000000001, + 315.7330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 161.19 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 477.9 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767339" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2a3cdeef19c2ca8f1d2fb8106bb91ec98625a48 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.md @@ -0,0 +1,6825 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Air 1 bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800X3003/B + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, + +-VS- + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +A Cos + +### SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/CCHEM DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE' RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, AND RI UEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND APPOINTMENT OF AND THE UPPLEMENTT I THAT M TI N + +Counter-Plaintiff and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Supplemental Response to P •er-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Pr ture of Documents, and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary t eating ar and Appointment of Special ("Motion to Declare Relevance") and cup pl ent to that motion, and as grounds therefore states: + +### INTRODUCTION + +has already determined that Epstein may not admit into evidence or otherwise refer to ihbprivileged documents in question. This Court's decision was based upon the fact that Epstein and his counsel had possession of the materials for years, in violation of a federal court order, yet failed to timely list them as exhibits, in violation of multiple court orders and rulings. Epstein also failed to seek a determination before the close of discovery as to the privileged nature + +of the documents, despite the fact that most of them were included on a privilege log filed in this Court in April 2012. + +Not one to take no for an answer, Epstein is back yet another bite at this already wellchewed apple. Epstein has raised no new issues here which should support a different result than this Court has already ordered. To the contrary, the instant Motion was pending whe this Court made the decision to strike Epstein's amended exhibit list which included th ments in question. This Court heard significant argument on the issue before is extensive, thoughtful ruling. There is absolutely no reason for this Court to s n ore time than it already has considering this issue. Epstein's Motion to Declare van must be denied. + +### RELEVANT FA + +Although this Court is familiar with the issu ihc, i h as it already heard argument and ruled on it, includes a recitation of v facts to remind this Court why it struck the late filed exhibits, including the pn ed t7Jdterials identified in 2012 privilege log. + +### The Discovery Orders Violatal by Epstein N14/...." + +On July 20, 2017 ourt entered its Order Specially Setting Trial, which set the case for trial beginnin cem r 5, 2017. In its Order, the Court required that the Pm-Trial Stipulation e include "cac s numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attach stipulation." (emphasis added). The Court made clear that the parties would be "strictly limited to exhibits ... disclosed ... on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation ...absent agreement specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown." (emphasis added). Thus, the Court's July 20, 2017 Order limited the parties to only those trial exhibits that were specifically identified and disclosed on the Pm-Trial Stipulation. + +In October and November 2017, the parties began exchanging exhibit lists and producing proposed exhibits in connection with the Court's Order. Epstein's Exhibit List listed as Exhibit #13, "miscellaneous," the broadest catch-all provision possible: All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter. + +At the December 5, 2017 hearing, after continuing the trial until March at th request of Epstein, the Court instructed that any identified exhibits not previously produced rovided to opposing counsel by no later than December 19, 2017. See, e.g" (12/5 225-226). A copy of the transcript is attached at Exhibit A. The Court also cauti eneral "catch-all" exhibit categories would not be permitted and that, instead, At V 'ec i documents covered by t , such exhibits must be separately identified and produced. e e. 12/5/17 Tr. at 223- 225). The message to the parties was clear: trial by ambush w SS permitted.' + +On December 19, 2017, Epstein produ i of certain listed exhibits pursuant to that directive. Epstein's Exhibit #13 contain en ven (27) RRA emails. None of these emails were listed on five (5) r vilege log, discussed further below. + +On December 22, 2017 the ies filed the Pre-Trial Stipulation. Epstein's Exhibit List was attached to the Pre- 4 L tipulation. A copy of the Exhibit List Stipulation is attached as Exhibit B. + +Eps ( S i it e #13 was comprised of the 27 emails that had been specifically identified and p ant to the Court's December 5, 2017 ruling and the December 19, 2017 exhibit + +The Court's oral ruling was memorialized on January 16, 20. 81\_ i when the Court entered its Order on Epstein's Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine Section B ( 1 Trial Exhibits). This Order required to produce all trial exhibits that had not already been produced by December 20, 2017 and to produce all specific exhibits to a general "catch-all" category by no later than January 5, 2018. Although the Order did not specifically require Epstein to do the same, the reason was straightforward: Epstein claimed that he already produced all specific trial exhibits on December 19, 2017. + +exchange, Epstein was "strictly limited" to those 27 specific documents absent a showing of good cause, which would necessarily require the filing of some motion seeking relief from the Court. + +Throughout February 2018, Epstein began piecemeal producing additional proposed exhibits, in violation of the orders discussed above. Epstein's violation of the Court's orders culminated on March 2, 2018, with the eve-of-trial2 production of 198 new emails, all illicitly obtained, under Exhibit #13, which included at least forty-nine (49) privileged ema are listed on April 2012 privilege log. 14C ' + +On March 5, 2018, Epstein filed the instant Motion to Declare a c .3 That same day, moved to strike Epstein's supplemental exhibits a s e all exhibits and any reference to documents contained in April 201 p 'yr log. + +On March 8, 2017, this Court held a heart Sin lefrv 1 outstanding motions. One issue addressed involved Epstein's late disclosure o eged documents. suggested that his motion to strike be addressed first b it Id alleviate the need to delve into other issues related to Epstein's intended use o eged emails (3/8/18 PM Tr. pp. 3-7). A copy of the transcript is attached as Exhib er extensive argument by counsel, the Court granted the motion to strike, finding stein should have produced the documents in question and raised any issues relatin the ed nature of the documents long before the already expired time for the produ lion f exhibits. The Court explained: + +materials were in the hands of Epstein's attorneys from the inception of the issicitself, and to now come to the Court with not five pages of documents to look at, but 27,000, or whatever that number is — it escapes me because of its shear mass — is impossible and is not going to be countenanced here. + +•\*\* + +2 Trial was set to begin on March 13, 2018. + +3 Epstein filed a supplement to the Motion on April 4, 2018 and filed supplemental authority on April 5, 2018. + +The issue though, is one of whether the protocol and the orderly administration of justice is going to be forsaken notwithstanding also the aspect of privilege and the sanctity of privileged communications, whether all of those considerations are going to be thrown out when balanced against material that has been in the hands of Mr. Epstein's lawyers from day one. And I, for one, am not going to sacrifice protocol over what may or may not be, number one, privileged, and if not privileged, certainly late disclosed documentation of a massive nature. + +\*\*\* + +Again, if this was something that came into play that was being hidden by the o er side, and I'm talking now generically, and your side discovered that informs i at the 11th how, this would be an entirely different discussion And that's o things 1 want to emphasize for this record. But that's not the case. + +As I mentioned — and this is the last time I'll say it — these docu a e been in the possession of Mr. Epstein from the inception of this ase know it. They didn't move. And the problems that are inherent in this of which this Court simply does not have the time to address prior to re of these reasons that I have just described to you: The disruption oft rly administration of justice, the sacrosanct nature of the privilege, and?\* re importance is what I said I wouldn't repeat; and that is, that at all times material to the analysis, from the inception Epstein lawyers had/this material, And obviously, the timeliness, or the abject untimeliness gthe request for the Court now to take these matters into consideration, w e they are well beyond when exhibits that were known or should have b e nown were not listed. + +\*\*\* + +That's the point I'm trying to timeliness, not only the i foremost is the fact that this from day one for s and emphasize. It is not only the issue of vilege that has not been tested, but first and te, Epstein's own lawyers, have been sitting on t years. + +(3/18/18 PM Tr., pp.51-5 exhibits, regardl case but fail t until months after the deadline to do so had expired. asis added). Thus, this Court found that Epstein could not utilize nvilege issue, which he had possession of since the beginning of the + +## TimeliJcQ 1Le nrivileaed materials at issue + +In order to orient the Court as to the specific issue of privilege log, has compiled the following timeline concerning the privileged e-mail communications at issue. Because the privileged materials are e-mail communications from RRA, Epstein originally sought these records in the Bankruptcy Court to be produced by the Trustee appointed to oversee the RRA + +bankruptcy proceeding. has highlighted the key state court docket entries for the Court's convenience: + +| State Court December 7, 2009 Epstein ' | this suit against Rothstein, and | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| one of | clients, designate " ." Epstein | +| claimed, generally, that Rothstein, | and L.M. | +| three civil sexual assault actions | bro t against | +| April 17, 2010 Epstein propounded a broad subpoena | T tee for | +| RRA as an interested party in the ban .• • | case of In re: | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 09-3479 a | esting tens | +| bankruptcy trustee because the Mc . | in possession of | +| July 19, 2010 LM (one of Epste | ' *cti s) filed an objection and | +| amended motion f. | ' order, DE 819, explaining | +| that the emails | t were barred from disclosure | +| based on priv. e | d levance grounds. | +| August 13, 2010 Judge R ' | bankruptcy action entered aiiiiii | +| directi pro | ion of the emails to a special | +| Jud e | , appointed to oversee the emails produced | +| r | e a privilege log. DE 888. | +| September 20, 201 | aving received 27,590 emails, Special | +| | ey moved for clarification of the Or made | +| | s ggestions that LM's attorneys, including were | +| mbe 7, 2010 Ili carp | moved for protective order through counsel Jack | +| 4) tember 30, 2010 LM joined in that DE 1022 motion and requested further | | +| October 13, 2010 | Hearing on Motion to Clarify before Robert Carney. | + +| Bankruptcy Court | October 15, 2010 | The bankruptcy court entered an Order which clarified its earlier Order, DE 1068, requiring that the trustee provide the emails at issue to [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos Lehrman ([REDACTED] firm at the time which was representing LM) and requesting FJWEFL prepare the log. The order also provided a procedure for the special [REDACTED] to hold a hearing about assertions of privilege. | +|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| State Court | November 23, 2010 | Epstein filed his amended privilege log. | +| Bankruptcy Court | November 30, 2010 | The court authorized Epstein's predecessor counsel, [REDACTED] [REDACTED], to copy the RRA emails and to provide copies to Judge Carney and FJWEFL. The court expressly prohibited [REDACTED] [REDACTED] from retaining any copies of the documents. A copy of the Order is attached as Exhibit D. | +| Bankruptcy Court | December 16, 2010 | LM filed a motion requesting a stay of the Order directing the preparation of a privilege log until after the time when the State court ruled on the then pending Motion for Summary Judgment, DE 1236. | +| Bankruptcy Court | December 22, 2010 | Bankruptcy court entered an order extending the time for production of the privilege log until January 31, 2011. DE 1260. | +| State Court | January 25, 2011 | FJWEFL produced 8,408 pages of non-privileged documents to Epstein. | +| Bankruptcy Court | January 26, 2011 | FJWEFL served a privilege log, and the sufficiency of that log was challenged by Epstein in the bankruptcy court. DE 1442. | +| State Court | February 8, 2011 | Epstein filed a Motion to Compel/Motion to Determine if Privilege Claims are Waived for failure to provide a privilege log. | +| Bankruptcy Court | February 15, 2011 | FJWEFL filed a privilege log in the Bankruptcy Court. | + +| Bankruptcy Court | February 23, 2011 | FJWEFL filed an updated privilege log (the current privilege log) detailing the emails where privilege was being maintained. In addition to filing the privilege log, FJWEFL produced to counsel for Epstein, 12,711 pages of documents divided into two separate categories respectively labeled "attorneys eyes only" and "[REDACTED] Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails." Two boxes of "attorneys eyes only" documents were produced containing 1,829 pages of documents in the first box and 3,198 pages of documents in the second box. Two additional boxes of "Farmer Jaffe Irrelevant E-Mails" were also produced containing 3,804 pages of documents in the first box and 3,880 pages of documents in the second box | +|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| State Court | March 30, 2011 | Judge [REDACTED] entered an order staying the subpoena to the trustee. | +| State Court | July 12, 2011 | Epstein's Motion for Leave to Use Attorneys Eyes Only Documents produced under confidentiality agreement. | +| State Court | July 14, 2011 | [REDACTED] protective order granted. Epstein request for all emails is overbroad and not necessarily calculated to lead to admissible evidence. | +| State Court | March 9, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order relating to the subpoena to the Bankruptcy Trustee. | +| State Court | April 10, 2012 | Order requiring [REDACTED] to produce any non-privileged documents as identified in paragraph 13 of [REDACTED] Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order. | +| State Court | April 11, 2012 | Epstein files [REDACTED] February 23, 2011 Privilege Log from the Bankruptcy Court in this case. This Privilege Log identifies many of the privileged materials that Epstein is now attempting to use at trial. | +| State Court | April 11, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel production of documents from [REDACTED] and for Sanctions. | +| State Court | May 7, 2012 | [REDACTED] produces 163 pages of additional responsive documents in compliance with April 10, 2012 Order | +| State Court | May 8, 2012 | Order requiring better Privilege Log | +| State Court | May 15, 2012 | [REDACTED] Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues to clarify the scope of the May 8, 2012 Order. | + +| State Court | May 15, 2012 | Epstein Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | +|--------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| State Court | May 30, 2012 | Epstein Amended Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions | +| State Court | August 3, 2012 | Hearing on Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues. | +| State Court | August 14, 2012 | Scarola letter to Judge ██████ enclosing proposed Order on Motion for Clarification on Discovery Issues.

Provided before Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against ██████ | +| State Court | August 16, 2012 | Epstein voluntarily dismisses case against Edwards without prejudice. | +| State Court | August 17, 2012 | Judge ██████ grants Edwards' Motion for Clarification and vacates his ██████ y 8, 2012 Order requiring an amended privilege log. 4

██████ April 12, 2012 Privilege Log remained in full force and effect. Epstein never challenged the sufficiency of that privilege log or made any attempt to overrule Edwards' privilege assertions or compel production of these privilege materials. | + +To summarize, with a total of 27,590 emails to evaluate. On January 25, 2011, produced 08 ges of non-privileged emails to Epstein. On February 23, 2011, produce ditional 12,711 pages of emails, which included 5,027 pages of emails that were "Attorney's Eyes Only." Between the January 25 and February 23, turned over 21,119 pages of emails to Epstein. properly listed + +4 Judge Order also required to "file a written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 ... [the response] shall identify, in a proper privilege log as referenced in the Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege." Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Com I concerned emails between RRA lawyers and either (1) the Federal Government; (2) .iairas anc reporters. Because Epstein had already voluntarily dismissed his action against • did not produce any written response to Paragraph 13 or any emails between RRA and these third parties. Epstein thereafter made no effort to seek production of these emails. + +the remaining 6,471 pages of emails on his privilege log filed on February 23, 2011 in the Bankruptcy Court. Pursuant to Epstein's July 12, 2011 Motion for Leave to Use Attorneys' Eyes Only Documents Produced Under Confidentiality Agreement, the Attorneys' Eyes-Only documents are governed by a confidentiality agreement. + +On April 11, 2012, Epstein filed privilege log from the bankruptcy case in this case. Pursuant to Judge August 17, 2012 Order vacating his prior Order r Edwards to file a better privilege log, the February 23, 2011 privilege log filed in this case on April 11, 2012 remains in full force and effect. '...) ) c + +After voluntarily dismissing his claims against tc ever sought to overrule any of these privilege assertions or to compel production t leged materials listed on the log. Epstein has obviously been on notice of the pri n e of those documents knew they had been withheld from production, and for the eve of trial, abandoned all efforts to challenge privilege assertions. + +### ARGUMENT + +- 1. All argument in Epst t( 's Motion to Declare Relevance and Supplement stating or otherwise implying the tiged substance of the documents in question should be stricken and/or ded. + +tains "that the late listed and illicitly obtained materials in question are privileged, in the privilege log filed in this Court in April 2012, which has been in full force for over six (6) years. + +Unfortunately, due to Epstein's improper prior possession of the documents in question, Epstein and his counsel have seen the content of the materials. Epstein has improperly referred to, mischaracterized, and relied upon the contents of the materials to support his position in the instant motion and supplement. contests Epstein's mischaracterization of the contents of the + +material but he cannot address the issue further as he does not want to be accused of waiving his privilege claims. Suffice it to say, strongly disagrees with the characterizations of the contents of the emails in question portrayed by Epstein. + +asks that this Court strike and/or disregard all such improper references to the contents of the materials sidering this issue as Epstein should never have been in possession of the material with. Epstein should not be permitted to e on his improper possession of th ed materials by purporting to rely tent of said materials, especially where cannot contest the allegations m + +### 2. This Court should readdress this issue whi cu• ) l has ready decided. + +As discussed above, on March 8, 2018, this Co significant time considering the issue of whether Epstein could use the privile item ents in question during trial. The instant motion was pending at the time an f tw s, n rily considered in conjunction with + +Motion to Strike Epstein's 1 tied ibits. Based on the Court's decision that the exhibits would be excluded beca h e filed months after the deadline for listing exhibits, despite the fact that Epstein's Apunsell ad possessed the documents since the inception of these proceedings, the Court di' to address the issues raised in Epstein's Motion (i.e., determine relevance and pri es, hold in camera proceedings, etc). + +Epste venth-hour antics have cost this Court and enough time. The Court should waste more time reconsidering an issue which has already been decided. Epstein's Motion should be denied without further discussion for the reasons expressed by the Court in its oral ruling on March 8, 2018. + +### 3. The deadline to amend exhibit lists has long since passed. + +maintains his position expressed in his March 5, 2018 Motion to Strike, argued on March 8. All exhibits produced by Epstein after December 20, 2017 in violation of this Court's July 20, 2017 Order, December 5, 2017 oral ruling, and January 16, 2018 Order should be stricken. Additionally, all exhibits produced by Epstein that contain or reference privilegyd material included on Court's oral ruling on March 8, 2017. April 2012 privilege log should be stricken. This is co with this + +Although does not believe that this Court should expdhd t e to consider the merits of Epstein's arguments, addresses them below. + +## 4. did not waive his work product objec . + +"Attorney-client privilege and work-prod 8 u n are important protections in the adversarial legal system, and any breach of th p 4s,i give one party an undue advantage over the other party." Nevin v. Palm Be oun Sch. Bd., 958 So.2d 1003, 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, "waiver of th lient and work-product privileges is not favored in Florida." TIG Ins. Corp. of Am. on, 799 So.2d 339, 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). + +- a. against did ve work product protection for all but new and ongoing cases + +Epstei waived work product protections as to the materials in question ( . 6-8).5 By including the documents on his privilege log instead of turning them over to Ep in This contention is obviously absurd. + +5 This is a reference to the Supplement to Epstein's Motion to Declare Relevance, filed on April 4, 2018. + +Epstein relies upon excerpts from an email sent by former firm, Jaffe Weissing Fistos Lehrman, to Judge Carney, discussing the management of the production of the thousands of RRA emails Epstein subpoenaed. The relevant portion of that emails provides: + +We will agree to prepare a revised log in which we add dates for the emails and a description of the subject matter and parties. But we will also omit from the log any work product privilege objections, subject to the following agreement. All ork product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for materials related t ew or ongoing cases, AND on the condition that th are r ed "F i r A Eyes Only" such that no copies or images will be made of them and 'ra in 1 not see these documents, unless and until such time as Judge ii udge Ray has overruled any privilege claim (following your recomm- d . • 'rt, of course). If the objections are sustained, the documents will be us and no copies retained by Plaintiff's attorneys; if the objections ov#ruled and the documents otherwise deemed discoverable, Plaintiff ge m. The Plaintiff and his attorneys will also agree that by enterin to is agreement and producing these documents as described, Plai flnot take the position that we have waived any privilege. + +it (Supp., Ex. B)(underline in original, bold added) \, th agreement contemplated that even as to documents actually turned over to Epste cow14eI for "Attorneys' Eyes Only" review, any claim of privilege would not be waiv + +Epstein's argument app o ]fat because he believes the documents in question should have been turned over for Atto Eyes Only review and they were not, waived his work product protec 'on cl m . This argument is meritless. Regardless of whether the documents in question s been turned over for Attorneys' Eyes Only review pursuant to the agreemen the parties, the protection would never have been waived. That is because the parties a that the privilege would not be waived as to documents turned over for Attorneys' Eyes Only review. In addition, the emails that Epstein relies upon clearly state that materials related to ongoing cases are exempt from that agreement, which includes emails related to the Crime Victim's Rights Act proceeding. Thus, none of the emails in question were subject to production at all, whether Attorney's Eyes Only or any other form. + +Furthermore, the documents in question were not, in fact, turned over. They were listed in the privilege log. There is no support for the implication raised by Epstein that the alleged failure to properly execute an agreement regarding the management of purported work-product waives the work product privilege, especially where the documents are listed on a privilege log and where the privilege would have maintained regardless of how they were addressed. To the co trary, even if had originally agreed to turn over the documents for Attorneys' Eyes view, he was free to reassert the right to include the documents in his privilege t time before disclosure. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lease Am., Inc., 735 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999Xnoting that the initial failure to make a claim for privile the privilege); see also Truly Nolen Exterminating, Inc. nlljlon, 554 So.2d 5, 5-6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989Xfailure to assert work-product privile, result in the waiver of t opportunity does not constitute waiver "so long as the privilege is asserted by s p r , to the trial court, before there has been an actual disclosure of the information ged be protected"), rev. dismissed, 558 So.2d 20 (Fla.1990); Insurance Co. of N. A 398 So.2d 836, 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (failure to file timely objections does not pa from asserting privilege). + +- b. did r jYpjve work product protection by sharing the documents with third parties. sos + +Epstei te that waived the work product protections by providing the materials to attorneys from Conrad & Scherer working on the Razorback litigation (Supp., p.:' nrad & Sherer, however, entered into a joint prosecution agreement with counsel, whereby both parties agreed to share information relative to their claims and/or defenses related to Scott Rothstein without waiving privilege as to their communications or documents shared. + +"Voluntary disclosure of alleged work product waives work-product privilege where that disclosure is inconsistent with maintaining secrecy from the disclosing party's adversary—or, in other words, the disclosure substantially increases the chance that the opposing party will obtain the information." Tumelaire v. Naples Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 137 So.3d 596, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Here, disclosure to Conrad & Scherer was not inconsistent with his intent to maintain secrecy from Epstein. To the contrary the disclosure was done to a joint prosecution agreement whereby not be disclosed to adverse parties, including Epstein. and Conrad & Scherer agreed tO serial would + +- c. did not waive work product protection by ' ing malicious prosecution claim. + +Epstein claims that the work product protectiorjJi feejt fvaived here because the emails at issue directly relate to issues "injec MI11160113 prosecution counterclaim6 (Supp., pp.9-10). This argument is meritle + +It is well-established that "[a] bringing or defending a lawsui CCS ad not waive the attorney-client privilege merely by Akerman, Sentetfitt & Eidson, P.A., 940 So.2d 504, 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). , waiver occurs when a party 'raises a claim that will necessarily req \*re pr f y way of a privileged communication.'" Id. (quoting Jenney v. Airdata Wima c., 6 So.2d 664, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)); see also Savino v. Luciano, 92 So.2d 817, 1957)(noting that the "at issue" doctrine provides that "when a party has filed a claim, b upon a matter ordinarily privileged, the proof of which will necessarily require that the privileged matter be offered in evidence, we think that he has waived his right to insist, in + +6 Much of this argument is based upon Epstein's mischaracterization of the contents of the emails in question. As discussed above Epstein should not have read the contents of the emails in question and should not be permitted to rely upon the alleged contents of the emails to support his argument. + +pretrial discovery proceedings, that the matter is privileged."). "Thus, for waiver to occur under the at issue doctrine, the proponent of a privilege must make a claim or raise a defense based upon the privileged matter and the proponent must necessarily use the privileged information in order to establish its claim or defense." Coates, 940 So.2d at 510. + +Here, malicious prosecution claim was not based upon the emails at issue here. certainly will not be using the privileged information to establish hi it against Epstein. cis + +The elements of a malicious prosecution claim are: + +- 1) the commencement of a judicial proceeding; 2) its! :4. ' usa n by the present defendant against the plaintiff; 3) its bona fide tcrmin liti r avor of the plaintiff; +- 4) the absence of probable cause for the prosecuti ce; [and] 6) damages. + +Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So.3d 602, 604 (Fla. 4th S A 1 All of these elements, other than l SE damages and bona fide termination, require p Ss" t pstein's state of mind and knowledge at the time the original action against Edw ?sleo w nunene,ed and/or continued. Because Epstein did not have the work product in • hen suit was filed or continued, claim cannot be based upon those ma + +Epstein also impl the emails are relevant to claims for damages because they may contra\* ms regarding the effect of Epstein's claims on him. However, some possible rele not the standard for waiver based upon issue injection. It is well established that thC bility that the disputed documents may be relevant to or may assist the lawyers in their defense ... or may perhaps assist in the lawyers' efforts to impeach the clients, does not create a waiver of the privilege." Coates, 940 So.2d at 509 (citing Jenney, 846 So.2d at 668 ("[A]ttorneyclient privilege is not waived simply because the credibility of Jenney's statements concerning his intent could possibly be impeached by his communications with his former attorney."); Choice Restaurant Acquisition Ltd. v. Whitley, Inc., 816 So.2d 1165, 1167-68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (discussing the accountant-client privilege and noting that "a court cannot justify finding waiver of the privilege merely because the information sought is needed by the opposing party to provide information helpful to cross examination or for the defense of a cause of action" and that "mere relevance of the information is not sufficient grounds to override this privilege' , Gold, =, Zakarin & Kotler, P.A., 715 So.2d 1021, 1023 (Fla. (determining, in a legal malpractice action, that the defending law firm's firm had been negligent did not serve to override the client's atto subsequent firm); Shafnaker v. Clayton, 680 So.2d 1109, 1111 1`s that respondents could not discover communications pe (,) though the information may have assisted responde in e defense). "S t ;Coyne v. A 1998) a subsequent rivilege with the A 1996) (concluding with other attorneys even + +\ By seeking damages for intangible ele u as "anxiety" door for Epstein to obtain privileged wo into mental well-being. In other product and attorney-client pri him impeach re • his damages claim. (SYc hich he believes may offer some vague insight tein is not entitled to breach the sacrosanct work because he thinks the materials at issue here may help has not opened the + +## r d. Edwar pri ege log was not inadequate and did not waive work product P + +in claims that waived the relevant privileges by deliberately concealm emails in question in a "159-page privilege log" which was somehow an "improper device." (Supp., p.10). There are many problems with this argument. First and foremost is the implication that filed a 159-page privilege log to conceal the documents in question. The size of the privilege log was necessitated by the overbroad request made by Epstein, who sought tens of thousands of documents. made every effort to produce all non-privileged + +documents and made great efforts to limit the number of documents on the privilege log in order to lessen the burden on Judge Carney. Additionally, it is unfathomable that Epstein claims that "concealed" documents which were expressly listed in a privilege log. + +Epstein challenges the legal sufficiency of privilege log by claiming waived the relevant privileges by not complying with Judge Crowe's August 17, 2012 rder to file a written response. In the order in question, Judge Crowe actually vacated lri ier order requiring to file an amended privilege log. In addition, Judge Croio to file a written response to Paragraph 13 of Epstein's Motion to Compe privilege log," "responsive documents withheld from producti thlt6 sis of any assertion of privilege." Paragraph 13 concerned emails between R and either. (1) the Federal Government; (2) and (3) any SlidEers. Because Epstein had already voluntarily dismissed his action against Edw ds did not produce any written response to Paragraph 13 or any emails between the assignment was the level of dissemination of defaming statements - defaming statements. that'S on page Ors, + +Page four. I refer to the statement, associating Mr. with the illegal 20 activities of Mr. Rothstein's, the results 21 of Mr. Rothstein's lawsuits as the defaming 12 statements. + +21 So what they plan to do is put on an 24 expert to demonstrate that the allegation: 15 of the complaint were defaming and caused 24 damages, the defamation action. + +27 There's nothing in the elements of 28 malicious prosecution that make it relevant 29 for en expert to get on the stand and talk 20 about defaming statements in the complaint. + +21 In fact, to do so violates the roadsap 22 that the Supreme Court just gave us. There 23 is no better authority than Debrincat on how 24 this case should go forward. But if they're 25 going to be allowed to put an expert on to + +8 + +talk about defaming statements, if they are 2 going to be allowed to put on the allegations of the complaint and test their 1 truth or falsity. which are protected by S litigation privilege, we then need to have 6 affirmative defenses. That sounds like 1 defamation. + +8 Last point I want to point out in 9 bebrincat, Your Honor, is this. It's in the analysis, and it's the second sentence of the analysis. The law has long recognized :2 that judges, counsel, parties and witnesses :3 should be absolutely exempted from liability :4 to an action -- this is the key -- it :1 doesn't say to defamation -- to an action, :6 to be specific -- to any action for defamatory words published in the course of :8 the Judicial proceeding. + +:9 So if we are exempted from liability 7:0 for the words published in the lawsuit, then we don't need these affirmative defenses, because they will then have t0 focus on probable cause for the judicial proceeding. 22 :3 :4 :3 But if they are going to be allowed to bring in allegations of the complaint, truth or + +3 4 6 7 9 Otherwise, if you look affirmative defenses, Y have any. The reason we didn't raise advice in don't hire any is eel. There's not a statute o 'cations defense. We have no affirmat eases because we are defend, aalici s prosecution action. + +falsity, then we need these affi defenses. ?cc + +ask this COUrt, if this Court is al them to try the truth or :2 Isity .f the statements in the complaint, :3 be allowed to amend our pleading. + +THE COURT: You are not seeking t0 amend to affirmatively defend on advice of :6 counsel? + +MR. LINK: We are not, sir. They are all defamation affirmative defenses. THE COMO': Well, there's also the 70 constitutional affirmative defenses that you are seeking to interpose dealing with the 22 petition to file against the government or 73 something along those lines. :8 :9 21 + +.74 MR. LINK: Those are all defamation. 25 They are all protection of speech. + +It But that's what this door is Opening. That's what they want to do. And we suggest + +THE OMR?: I presume that falls under that same umbrella. KR. LINK: It does. Your Honor. Everything that we've asked the Court to allow us to amend is designed to protect our record, frankly, that we believe that everything in our pleading -- let me give you an example. + +The Court dismisses Mr. 1111111' count for abuse of process based on litigation privilege. At the end of the suit when we win, if we sued Mr. Scarola prosecution in going fe are the statements he proceedings -- for ex serial child so because the does he we bring malicloca h this care. Mr. Epstein ia a they protected this proceeding? Or privilege somehOir because us prosecution action? court tells us very clearly we sue Mr. SCarOla for his ts. It has no purpose in the cious prosecution action. + +to Your Honor we don't want to come back a second time. Me would like to try this case once. We would like to focus on the elements of malicious prosecution and not try a defaming.wOrds Case in front of the jury. + +Thank you. Your Honor. THE COOKY: Okay thank you, Mr. Link. Mho is going to be arguing on behalf of Mr. Mr. Burlington? + +MR. BIBILINCION: May it please the Court. I am Phillip Burlington representing Brad + +14 1 have not heard anything today that 15 justifies their claim that the rights to 14 petition the government provides them an 22 affirmative defense as they allege in their 18 fifth affirmative defense. That has nothing 19 to do with defamation. Me have explained 20 why it is not a defense to a malicious 21 prosecution case. Because, as the OS 22 Supreme Court has stated very clearly, 23 baseless litigation is not protected by the 24 privilege to engage in petitioning of the 23 government under the First Amendment. + +t would note that even considering the 2 presentation here, there is not a single case from any jurisdiction cited by the-4 that says that any of these defenses are valid in a malicious prosecution case. Not 6 a single case. + +7 They have gone so far as to cite thr 8 Noerr-Pennington cases, which are anti-trust 9 cases involving efforts to lobby the legislative and executive branches of government, and they have taken that and :2 tried to apply it to the malicious prosecution case. That makes no sense. + +:4 Now, as to the other defenses, they :5 have also passed over two very critical :6 considerations which were not addressed in their motion, and have not been addressed :8 here. And T hope will not be addressed for '2 the first time in the rebuttal, since we addressed it very squarely in our response, and that is, there are three grounds to deny :2 a metier. to amend. One is where the party :3 has abused privilege. The second is where :4 the amendment would prejudice the opposing 75 party. And then the third is whether the + +4 6 7 Now, in this case, the e se five affirmative defenses eight a i the befo e of this had for thi, litigation and were special setting that th Month. + +affirmative defenses would be fut they are legally insufficient. + +We pointed hour response there was no yrp1onatio by it took them eight :o Year up these affirmative is on abuse of the privilege :2 :3 :6 :8 :9 ntil the eve of trial after y Is almost completely concluded to se multiple affirmative defenses, many of which raise factual issues that would require further discovery, possibly new experts, and maybe even a counter-pleading. Those reasons in themselves are sufficient to justify denial of this motion. + +20 21 >3 25 Rut, 1 have spent more time on the futility, because 1 certainly understand that Your Honor has always expressed concern that people are allowed to amend. And again, we don't think that they should based on the abuse of the privilege and based on + +10 22 22 23 34 12 is And this is very clearly stated in the paragraph preceding its conclusion. This court has never held that the litigation privilege protects a litigan row the claim of malicious prosecution ther district courts have s oted as the litigation privil not act as a bet to a malicious claim. + +1/ 28 1, 20 21 22 If the o eme Court was holding t et it s not bar proof of the first ale o alicious prosecution, they ve said that and said it remains in the other elements. Clearly they have been as categorical as they + +et What they have done is try to parse out language, again trying to woke the road's,: + +the prejudice to our client. Rut 1 will got back to the legal insufficiency. The argument that the Debrincat case gives a roadmap is simply wrong. Debrincat is not a roadmsp. It Is a dead end. It was the determination that the litigation privilege does not apply to a malicious prosecution case. + +p when it's clear this was intended to be a dead end for that privilege. + +20 And they talk about it's only the initiation of the claim that subjects the, to liability. Hut even in Debrincat when it talks about the first element, it says an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding against the present plaintiff use conenced or continued. In this case. Obviously, it was continued. + +21 They include the other elements, which 12 include that there was an absence of 13 probable cause for the original proceeding. 24 That means we can prove that the factual 25 allegations were false, that the legal 14 claims were invalid, as a matter of law, and 27 nothing in Debrincat precludes that. + +28 It was a simple, very short decision 29 for the Florida Supreme Court. And it 20 simply said the privilege does not apply t: 21 malicious prosecution claims. + +22 But even putting aside bebrincat, we 23 have never had a defamation claim. We have 24 never alleged it. And they have this string 22 cite of cases that talks about how, well -- + +it's called the single publication rule. Ti 2 your cause of action is based on a 3 defamatory publication, you can't avoid 4 defenses to defamation or the statute of S limitations by pleading things like 6 intentional inflection of emotional distress 2 or tortious interference with business 0 relationships, so forth and so on. + +9 It has nothing to do -- not a single one of those cases had to do with malicious prosecution. The only one that comes within :2 shouting distance is Fridovich. Rut in that :3 case, the Fourth District rejected the :4 malicious prosecution case, because that '5 case arose out of family allegations that a '6 family member murdered somebody, and they were essentially fighting over the estate. + +They created this conspiracy to bring '9 claims to the prosecutor to prosecute that family member for murder. That family member was ultimately convicted of :2 mane laughter. + +'3 SO the Fourth District said that's not :4 a bona fide termination in your favor, so they eliminated the malicious prosecution. + +4 Then they vent with dranmatia ?Cfits c 3' and related counts. It was a ar )4Cc) question in Fridovich -- ta . defamation. + +6 Rut they have Cit no Ca e from any jurisdiction that says u can convert a malicious pro tIon case into a defamation case, en raise defenses that rir nation cases. + +:6 e reliance on the deposition Gen is nothing but -- that was was an expert on damages and to reputation as a result of false Cements, which is an inherent part of a malicious prosecution case. And they have cited no cases to the contrary. + +:8 THE COURT: You have cases that cite affirmatively to that proposition? + +:9 20 21 22 23 25 BURLINGTON: There is a case called Mancusi out of the Florida Supreme Court that defined the elements and talked about it is designed -- in fact, Debrincat says that malicious prosecution is balanced between allowing people to bring suits and protecting the reputation of the individual. 10 But even if we go a little deeper int: these defamation claims to the defamation defenses, they are clearly invalid as a matter of law. + +21 22 For example, the fifth one -- excuse me. I have already address a fifth ono. + +13 14 15 16 Id The sixth one claim is a public figure. Previously, this maul factual set of for experts se a whole new keeps the need + +as 1, 20 21 22 Rut se makes it Crystal Clear thatt ornate attorney representing a despite their involvement In a le case, including their set in a proceeding unrelated to r civil proceeding -- is not a public Igor\*. That you cannot convert -- they are very specific -- YOU cannot convert + +SO that's one -- that's the nature of it. I mean, the fact that there are similar elements of damage does not convert malicious prosecution to a defamation count. And they have cited no case for that proposition. + +10 11 12 23 14 15 16 29 And what they have attached to their motion to amend -- which they Claim Brad made himself into a public figure - is nothing more than infinite statements on the law fin where Brad worked that talked about some of hiS COOS. And that'• nothing more than his professional responsibility and professional relationship for purposes of getting clients. + +le 19 20 21 22 23 THE COURT: Resume. MR. BURLINGTON: Excuse me? THE COURT: Resume. MR. BURLINGTON: Sure. And there's nothing even -- only one of them mentions Epstein. + +24 25 So they have cited no case from any jurisdiction that says that a defamation + +private attorney representing a client into an officer of the court to bootstrap yourself into saying he's a public official. and they also said in that case that we are not going to hold that someone who simply engages in their professional activities or has involvement in the Community is converted to a public figure. + +count can result in either a higher burden presumption of malice. 2 of proof or additional affirmative defenses So that case, the Hodes case. has 2 based on the nature of the individual who nothing to do with either the context of + +4 was sued in the baseless litigation. this case or the cause of action that we had + +5 Then their seventh affirmative defense brought. 6 just asserts generally just as a matter of And they've cited, as I've said, no + +7 public concern, and therefore we have a malicious prosecution cases to support the 4 higher burden of proof. idea that any of these defenses can be + +9 Again, this is rather late in the game valid. '0 to start changing, not only the factual 10 How, as to the -- I believe it's the '1 issues, but the burdens of proof. But they 21 eighth and ninth affirmative defenses, the, '2 also cite no case from any jurisdiction that 32 are not affirmative defenses all. '3 says a malicious prosecution case is altered 13 Affirmative defense Florida 4 on the basis of whether there wee a matter 14 Supreme Court has eta s whe a + +\$ of public concern involved. 13 defendant essentially to admit the 7 Mr. Apstein's criminal conduct into a matter 17 even assumi t •u know, I have this 8 of public concern is somewhat of a stretch. Is defense you ar mited in these matters + +:6 And here, inverting that notoriety of 14 allegations of di But say -- + +9 But also, in the Geste Case there was It in provin ur ate or in your damages. :0 notoriety in that criminal case. And Pert, made it very clear that the private attorney :2 representing '3 related proceedings, which had a lot of 2 a al proposition which they rely on to :4 publicity, did not convert him to either a 4 rovide the predicate for the sixth and '5 public official or a public figure. And \ seventh affirmative defenses. But it is + +20 21 fr eighth affirmative defense simply it nothing but a defamation suit. a client in proceedings and in 22 The of an affirmative defense. That IS + +• whether or not it was a matter of c I nothing but a statement of a legal 2 concern was not relevant. 2 proposition. It is not a defense. + +3 The case that they a gl n is The last affirmative defense claims 4 the Moder case, which 1 lo se that there are known procedures that this 8 the students, no ly teaching, and was a an affirmative defense. That's a + +S where the parent went the a d -- the Court could put fn place that could protect 6 school board to speak o net a teacher Apstein's due process rights in the context 7 that he believe a not properly preparing Of the punitive damages Claims. lhat'S not 9 harms.' Is am. il constitutional challenge in the proceedings o he a a public forum. It was an 20 Of this Court. While I'm not Saying they h, not a judicial branch. 21 Can't raise Constitutional challenges, it IS + +2 d all hat the Florida Supreme Court held 12 not an affirmative defense. :5 public forum -- there was a qualified 15 the, context of punitive damages that has :6 privilege, and the malice would not be 14 deprived Mr. Epstein of any due process 7 presumed from the defamatory statements. 27 rights. + +that context -- because it was a 13 I would add they haven't specified a ter of public concern in the appropriate 24 single thing that has happened thus far in + +s Now, again, that was a defamation suit. 28 And I gave a brief summary in our 9 It was nothing about malicious prosecution. 19 response to all the protections that have '0 But as Justice Scalia noted In his 20 been established in the case law, in the 72 malicious prosecution has the qualified 22 And until and unless they come to ye. 22 privilege built into it, because we have to 23 with a colorable argument that those 24 prove not only a lack of probable cause, but 24 procedures are inadequate, there's nothin2 25 we have to prove malice, and we do not get a 23 for you to do in response to that gerar c + +2: concurring opinion in the )(aline ease, 21 statutes, for protecting due process right- . + +2 3 e assertion that Mr. Epstein could never have his due process rights protected in the context of the punitive damages award. But what is clear is it's not an affirmative + +1 doesn't apply here. + +THE COURT: lot me ask you to explain for se, if you will, the issue of futility. Because usually, because of Florida's policy S defense at all. on liberality of amendments even at trial -- 2 say that the litigation privilege only the pleadings -- the amendment is typically 8 applies to one element of the malicious allowed. And then the affirmative defenses 9 prosecution claim, I submit, is facially are attacked, traditionally, by a motion to + +6 So, trying to parse out Debrincat - cases after trial that allows for amending 'o wrong in light of the complaint. And if lc strike. • they believe that Debrincat, which concludes 21 Mere your arguments on behalf of you. 2 by saying unequivocally that the litigation 22 client are that these are a a a '3 privilege does not apply to malicious 23 essentially futile in th that t 6 prosecution cases, they had an obligation 24 analogize it with a c f act n brooch' + +\$ because they were a tag-along case. 23 by a plaintiff in a gi case where the 2 Issuing Debrincat, issued an order in our 22 attempting type of cause of 8 case saying that Epstein should show cause is action t t wake no legal sense, or it is + +:6 And the Florida Supreme Court, after 26 plaintiff is al or ype of -- 9 why Debrincat does not control. And in It barred by e sting precedent s0 as CO :0 response, Epstein conceded that it did 20 r amendments futile. + +Control. 21 old suspect that that tame analogy + +:2 There IS no way to parse out anything 22 COY gply here, albeit, thiS IS the first :3 In Debrincat which would create entirely new 2 of rt, at least as to these affirmative :4 law in Florida about parsing out elements of 4 tense,, that have been made. :5 malicious prosecution for either purposes of But are you suggesting that under no + +• forcing the plaintiff into a post ?f 2 2 having a defamation claim or o ta 2 that it would be either amendable or that e claim and saying, ■ **we on 1 and the laws that have constituted these** + +reading of law and the facts that apply here 3 specific elements of a mall us o lion any potential amendment based on these facts **5 defenses to these. proposed affirmative defenses would be** + +**6 The falsity of the nts In th- futile? I complaint are e ly different from a NA. BURLINOION: You are correct that 8 publication, bec is the act of 9 normally when affirmative defenses are o Clie t fend, litigate, expend funds. 20 the means of challenging their legal** + +**) trigger q the lu Ial mechanism forcing my il initially asserted in a timely fashion, that tel y of those statements goes to 11 sufficiency is a motion to strike.** + +**2 ck of •robable cause. It goes to malice. 22 When a motion to amend is presented -- 3 is an element that we can prove 23 especially this late in the game -- it would sed harm and we should get compensatory 24 be a waste of judicial resources for you to :5 damages. 15 allow the amendment knowing that. as a** + +**:6 Again, they cited no case. They relied 16 natter of law, those defenses are invalid. 2 solely on Debrincat, and it is an extremely 17 And there are cases -- I'm not sure :s thinMIupon which to entirely change the 28 they're the ones cited in our response -- '1 on it being untimely with no explanation. 21 futile.** + +**:9 law of malicious prosecution. And I believe 29 but I have cited cases on futility where, if )0 that Your Honor should deny the motion based 20 they're legally invalid, they're necessarily** + +**22 None of these cases are new. Debrincat 22 And to go through the motion of 25 All the others are established law. It just 23 legal sufficiency is addressed in these** + +**23 is the only one that's within the last few 23 allowing them to amend, requiring us to move ze years. nut they had time to raise that. 24 to strike, allowing them to respond when the** + +1 memos -- + +2 They cited case law in their +3 affirmative defenses, themselves, trying to +4 justify them. So the futility is +5 different -- not different, but the need to +6 do a motion to strike is different when the +7 amendment is made. + +8 When you come to the court and seek it +9 to exercise its discretion to allow an +10 amendment, if it is legally invalid there's +11 no reason for the court to allow it, because +12 it would be futile. And that's one of three +13 ways of attacking the motion to amend, as +14 discussed in all the case law. + +15 Otherwise, to say it would be futile, I +16 guess, we would have to get into the factual +17 analysis of where the facts don't support +18 it. But there isn't much difference between +19 saying the facts don't support it and this +20 doesn't apply as a matter of law to this +21 cause of action. + +22 So I believe you are fully authorized +23 to look at the merits of these claims, which +24 have been argued in the motion and the +25 response. And they've certainly had an + +1 opportunity today to argue what they thought +2 was the legal validity. + +3 So to simply put that off and have +4 another hearing on it when the question here +5 is, Do you allow ██████ dents, which I believe +6 are clearly not valid to a malicious +7 prosecution cause of action. So I believe +8 you are authorized to do it on that basis as +9 well. + +10 THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Burlington. +11 I appreciate your written and oral +12 presentation, as well, Mr. Link. + +13 MR. SCAROLA: May I add just a little +14 bit to that? + +15 THE COURT: I will give you a couple +16 minutes. + +17 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, sir. + +18 THE COURT: After Mr. Scarola, +19 Ms. Rockenbach, if you want to add something +20 you are free to do so as well. + +21 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: I don't think that it +23 will take a couple minutes. + +24 It was one aspect -- + +25 THE COURT: Less than that? + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +2 There was one aspect of Mr. Link's +3 argument that I found extremely confusing. +4 And maybe it's just some -- + +5 MR. LINK: Your Honor, you mind if I +6 move so I can -- + +7 THE COURT: Feel free. + +8 MR. SCAROLA: -- some inability on my +9 part to comprehend the argument. But he +10 told us repeatedly that ██████ seeks to +11 prove the falsity of the allegations of the +12 complaint instead of proving there was no +13 probable cause to file the complaint. I +14 think he repeated that statement at least +15 three times. And quite frankly, I have no +16 idea what that means. + +17 In order to prove there was no probable +18 cause to file the complaint, we must look at +19 the factual allegations in the complaint and +20 we must demonstrate that there was no +21 probable cause to file those specific +22 factual allegations. That is, we must prove +23 the factual allegations were false, and we +24 must prove that there was no reason to +25 believe that they were true. This wasn't a + +1 good faith mistake. + +2 So the issues are identical. And what +3 they were attempting to do by way of this +4 motion to amend is to get right back to +5 where they were arguing last week, and that +6 is, they don't want to ever have to defend +7 against the claim that ██████ ██████ +8 fabricated false charges against Jeffrey +9 Epstein. They don't want to focus on that +10 at all. And this is one more means by which +11 to attempt to reargue that same position. + +12 THE COURT: Or fabricated false claims +13 against Jeffrey ██████ (sic) or -- + +14 MR. SCAROLA: Jeffrey Epstein. + +15 THE COURT: Fabricated false -- + +16 MR. SCAROLA: ██████ fabricated false +17 claims against Epstein. + +18 THE COURT: Correct. + +19 MR. SCAROLA: We will help each other +20 out with that. + +21 THE COURT: Or vice versa for that +22 matter, that Epstein fabricated false claims +23 against ██████, meaning, I am still not +24 sure where the defendant in the malicious +25 prosecution claim, Mr. Epstein, stands as to + +that issue, as to whether or not he's I as it relates to a traditional defamation claim, perhaps. + +2 conceding or not conceding. + +3 4 1 6 2 MR. SCABOLA: That has been scrupulously avoided by the other side, Your Honor. They don't want to face that issue or even acknowledge it exists. I agree with Your Honor. + +a THE COURT: shank you, Mr. Scarolz + +9 Mr. Link, couple things that I you/ t '0 like you to focus on. First is that -- I 10 argument of Mr. Burlington boiling it dam, '1 appreciate your bringing it to my attention, 21 to its very essence is. you can't fit a 's Mr. ' and Mr. Rothstein's names have 24 not a defametio cla '7 been linked, presumably as a result of 1/ I nett no plan and will not + +Some of these affirmative defenses, quite frankly, in handling defamation claims on numerous occasions in the past. I have never seen before. I never try to stifle creativity. But at the same time, we have to take into account, not only judicial resources, but what -- the essential '2 and I have heard this before -- about the 12 square peg into a round hole. And that is, '; punitive expert's testimony on behalf of 22 that the bulk of these a ve defenses, \*4 Mr. . that his research has revealed la because they deal wit at'e one, are '1 whatever number of instances whereby 15 not pertinent. Two a if they were, ft.- + +to Mr. Rpsteln's conduct. se try a def scion aim. And alsO, again, '2 MR. LINK: Yes, Your Nonor. It even if t C Id be conceivably construed 20 SHE COUR,: I haven't read it very 20 a ation claims, they don't pan legal + +Closely. At this point I don't know how 21 22 much of that testimony is going to get In. 22 e of them, such as the affirstativrt 'I But irrespective of that, what 2 de nee regarding the petitioning of the :4 Mr. Burlington has emphasised and what the 4 evernsent, has, in my view, absolutely no + +:5 Court clearly is under the impression as to application to this case. because If it did. + +• its utilisation, is not to prove I it would have application to any lawsuit 2 other element of the malicious ro 2 just about that I could conceive of that 2 claim except for damages. + +a 5 6 7 For example, an of ti nee to that aspect of the chi could entially be that Mr. fel itigate his damages by tart f his own seal in seeking 2 for his resents on of the alleged 5 at the time of th0e0 two cases. Hoerr and 0 victi the plaintiffs in those cases 20 Pennington, where there were issues of + +would be brought by any person, by any plaintiff, by any counter-plaintiff. + +The application is completely an opposite to what we're doing here. This is not redressable by virtue of petition to a publicity for hi eentation of Mr. -- 0 government, as are and as were, particularly Bps n. and therefore, Cause such 21 anti-trust violations and the testing of '2 damages by exercising that teal. 12 whether or not anti-trust laws were In ft.., se as to the damage claim, because just 14 obvious because of the Sherman Act -- the '7 similar to the questions I had of you last 27 against anti-trust violations. So there was :s week when I asked what were Mr. Rpstein'S 28 that nexus that was clearly prevalent there. - 2 damages as a result of his filing of the 29 So I really don't need further argument + +t2 at may constitute an affirmative 22 being violated. And the government's -- :5 like a simple negligence action is 25 government's obviously because of the :6 concerned, damages are a necessary element, 26 Sherman Act -- interest in protecting 20 initial suit against Rothstein, and 20 as to the fifth affirmative defense. 21 L.M., as related to the factoring of those 21 The sixth affirmative defense deals + +22 cases. 22 with the limited public figure. Be haven't + +22 So, there's a distinction of importance 22 really talked about that from your 74 that I can see here as it pertains to the 2a standpoint -- your position as to that in 25 affirmative defenses that have been asserted 25 light of the Gertz decision. + +KR. LINK: Yes. We believe that I. 2 defamatory statements are going to be the 3 basis for liability and for damages so that we're moving in absolute litigation 5 privilege from allegations in the complaint, 6 then the fact that Mr. is a quasi-7 public figure that puts himself out there, 8 that advertises, that speaks about these 9 issues, that issues press releases, talked to the press -- should come in as an affirmative defense in this case. + +:2 THE COURT: Now do you get around Gertz :3 essentially Saying precisely the opposite, :a that a lawyer -- even where a lawyer '5 represents a high-profile client? Were :6 these aren't high-profile clients. + +canon-sense thinking although :8 really not a pert of the decision here is '9 that outside of South Florida, and had :0 Mr. Rothstein not Committed the heinOUS crimes that he's been convicted for in 22 serving a sentence somewhere in the 23 neighborhood of 50 years, would have been off the radar. There would have been 25 no real issues, other than his connection + +3 with Mr. Epstein. Some may argue that Mr. to more of a public figure the r. under the analysis you + +6 Wk. LINK: Ns may very we 1 , You, Honor. + +7 1 :0 THE COURT: here. I don't meaning the on, and the fact that the to in GOrtt was in fact high-profile Client and there ded immunity -- which wouldn't have ion here whatsoever -- I don't see basic fundaments' issue being answered or even arguable. that's not the issue t2, with the plain + +:6 .7 MR. LINK: If I can take one shot at it, Your Honor. + +:8 :9 20 71 22 23 THE couRT: Sure. LINK: I think the difference is the fact that you represent a high-profile client does not make you a quasi-public figure. It's the steps and actions that you take as a result of that. + +21 25 So, the fact that the three plaintiffs that Mr. represented were not + +high-profile folks does not mean that he didn't voluntarily put himself out there end create an image and a reputation for hi fffff and put himself out there in a public way. + +There are easy examples. I represent high-profile client, Mr. Epstein. After the hearing, the press case up, I didn't talk to the press. I didn't put myself out there. Other lawyers will do that. They will give 20 press rel + +11 Mr. 22 13 34 went even beyond that. Me used these cases to promote that gees beyond simply client. elf in a way ting a + +15 to 19 MA. SC/a:GILA: You own, excuse me. Thera is no set rd a en to support that assertion 1 Abs. utely none. + +la It THE appreciate that. Thank. YOU. Mr. 20 may proceed. + +2i LINK: SO there is a distinction. 22 epresenting a high-profile client 2 not make you a quasi-public figure. doing things that put yourself out there -- Contacting the press. giving + +2 interviews, giving speeches, making yourself -- putting yourself out there sr specialist in this particular area and seeking press and accolades does -- that'; the distinction. + +10 11 12 So the fact that I'm representing Kr. Epstein, who may be a more well-known figure, doesn't wean I have done anything to assert syself into the public view. That's the distinction I would draw, Your Honor. ?NH COURT: Anything else you would like to Speak to? + +23 24 15 15 MR. LINK: Yes, if I can. I lust want to touch on a couple points that Mr. Burlington made and a point Kr. Scarola made. + +27 la 29 20 21 22 23 24 23 Here is the key to this and these affirmative defenses. And Your Honor asked a great question. You asked Mr. Burlington if any cases -- any of the malicious prosecution cases say that you can take a false statement -- allegedly a false statement from a complaint -- and use that to demonstrate lack of probable cause or damages. And he pointed to the Kancusi + +VISO. + +2 Your Honor. we looked at this case 1.1,t 3 time that we were here. It's a case that 4 Your Honor pointed out, I believe, that 1 talks about the mixed question of fact of 6 law and the probable cause. + +7 There's no discussion of damages other 8 than punitive damages in the case. It sets 9 forth the standards that your court told us about and recognised, which is, if there's no dispute as to the facts that were relied on in waking the decision to bring a '1 lawsuit, then it's up to you. And I said Your HOnOr may decide enough or not enough. \*\$ It's your call. It's not the jury's :6 decision. That's what Mancusi says. + +There is not a case that we have :8 seen -- endue looked a0 about 65 67 '1 cases. Florida eases that discussed that 20 you can use an allegation to the complaint to either show leek Of probable cause, based 22 on the truth or falsity, or use it to 21 establish damages. And here is why. + +24 Xr. Burlington doesn't think that the 25 Supreme Court case answers the question. but + +I think it does. And here is wha focus the Court on. It is not Yo 1 simply the first element of 4 prosecution element tha us o ivil 5 judicial proceeding. is is r the 6 Supreme Court Case. + +1 Rvery eler If you look -- an 8 original civil I i proceeding -- it 2 doesn't a count. IlegatIOn. Complaint. '0 It t ks the big picture. Why? Because la it is filed, that's the :2 he filing of the lawsuit, not what :3 in it. That's protected by the gation privilege. + +The present defendant was the legal :6 cause of the original proceeding. Second element uses the term original proceeding. :s Third element: determination of the original :9 proceeding. + +20 THE CORRY: You think that the 21 terminology, an original criminal or civil 72 judicial proceeding against the present 23 plaintiff was commenced or continued,' seems 74 to bring in, at least arguably, more than 25 just the initial complaint? + +MA. LINK: Yes. But the 'continued' has been defined very carefully. Mere is what the court said. The court says that continued means this: One, if I'm a new lawyer coming in. I don't have a defense if there was not probable cause. + +If I come in. don't do my homework and I continue with the proceeding, that's one aspect. + +10 The second aspect is, I may have 11 probable cause when I start, but if during 32 13 34 15 24 17 It 20 the course of the lawsuit s ping comes to my attention that makes conclude that what I thought was tr I have to stop, Your manor. get to keep going. But it as n. in o do with the allegations mint, what I say during m depot{ on, what you say during the case, t \* other lawyer say during + +21 22 if you look at every one Of these -- it's really important to look at 2\4 Alice. Vs\* of the words the original Y One of these elements, except for proceeding. + +AC c + +10 11 12 -- and look at damaged, 406.12, Your Honor, On malicious prosecution, you won't see anything in there about the publication of a false statement or damage Caused by a false statement. + +13 14 15 14 Contrast that with defamation, which it Specifically says if you (Ind that there was false statement, it's a whole different standard for damages. + +37 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 THE COURT: Again, we are going to need get to that bridge when we come to it. Rut the malicious prosecution damages state, quote. If you find for defendant, you will not consider the matter of damages. If you find for the plaintiff, you should award the plaintiff an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows ',out.: fairly and adequately compensate him for + +Six, the plaintiff suffered damage as a result of the original proceeding. Again, that's the filing of the complaint. And you look at Florida's jury instructions -- + +Mr. Sterols, I don't have them, but they are the standard jury instructions. 2 ] such loss, injury, damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution -- and then it also 4 parenthetically states -- continuation ." I presentation, feel free to do s0. 5 the proceeding complained of. + +I want to get into repetition. So if there's anything you want to say to rebut Mr. Burlington's argument or his written + +6 7 8 9 YR. LINK: So it depends on the focus. Mr. Scarola has not said -- t don't think - he has always said we're focused on the initial filing. There's not probable cause . '0 for the initial filing. That's what he has in Court tells us that there is still a 'I told us. He hes not said there was probable II litigation privilege afforded to every '3 the road Mr. Epstein learned something and 11 between when you make ision to :4 he should have stopped then. 14 institute. + +I0. LINK: As I have handed the court the KanCUS1 CaSe, YOUr Honor -- which does not say anything about statements or allegations in the complaint or damage, other than punitive damages -- the Supreme :2 cause at the beginning, Your Honor, but down 12 litigant. The narrow exr on ha, to do + +'5 So based on exactly what you read, it IS Kr. Scarola aai t he sees ther ns :6 focuses on, was caused by the institution of IS the same thi a very different. '7 it, the filing of lt. 11 One draws i you file the lawsuit. e THE COUR,: Continuation is one of the 14 And wha a on t is side of the line and '1 words that's utilised right there In bold, it before t ow it is filed is what is in e black print. 20 nd when you make the decision. And + +MR. LINK: If he was arguing that it 21 not protected. :3 not. He's not, I don't believe -- unless 2 a the truth and falsity of those + +:2 was continuation to cause damages. Re's 22 t what you plead in the complaint, :4 he's changed his mind. I allegations is absolutely protected. And :5 THE COM': Is that true? that's what the Supreme Court just told us. + ++ • MR. SCA ROLA: No, Your Honor Is 1 Thank you, Your Honor. 7 not true. Me contend there wa no 2 imS COURT: All right. Thank you, : 4 5 6 7 cause to Initiate this pr in was no probable cause to co e proceeding. The initi ion a ontinuation of the proceeding cause to 1111111: both ee no probable cause ever 8 existed. So it Initiated and b affirmative defense is concerned, that the + +Mr. Link. The Court is prepared to rule. I am going to go through It one step at a time and proceed through the fifth through the ninth affirmative defenses. + +The Court findS, as far as the fifth 9 continu n the a once of probable cause. il pleading made here has) no relationship n there vas never probable cause. 24 neither Pennington nor Hoerr, N-0-F.-R-R. :5 Hut the continuation isn't I filed it 15 have any application t0 this claim any v0r.• + +'0 K: Your Honor, that only sakes 20 whatsoever to the ease at bar. This is rt.:, • a If think what stout Mr. Scarola 21 a forum Of petitioning government for :2 at SS •, if it's not probable Cathie when I 12 redress. The Court has stated. and in :3 t and I continue with the lawsuit. 13 agreement with ' position• that + +:6 and it should have been eliminated that day. 14 than it would have to any generic claim :7 The second day after the lawsuit it's 17 brought by any plaintiff. + +:a already been continued. 28 This is not an anti-trust case. ThI. 20 to wrap up. We had planned on 40 minutes. 20 involvement is either directly or indirectly 23 MR. LINK: I appreciate that. 23 quote. forum of petitioning government for + +:9 THE coCitr: I will give you two minutes 19 is not a case where the government 7: Me are now going on 55. hut again, I want 21 at issue as it relates to the affirmative :2 to give both aides the opportunity -- 22 defense generally claiming that this is a. + +74 THE COVET: I have read the materials 24 redress, end quote. It is airply 25 and t have heard the arguments. I don't 25 inapplicable. Any amendment along those grounds will be futile. + +2 As far as the sixth affirmative defense, the Court finds that. as a matter • of law that the OM: case speaks to this issue broadly and specifically, and does not 6 place Mr. in the position of a 7 general or limited-purpose public figure. • Nonce, any affirmative defenses that re:, 9 upon that theory are, again, completely. entirely inapplicable to the matters that • are addressed in this case. + +:2 The seventh affirmative defense fails 1, because of the same reason. Additionally. the suggestion that, in accordance with the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the '6 United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, .8 may not recover presumed or punitive '1 damages without clear and convincing 7o evidence that Rpetein knew of the falsity of the claims that he made against were :2 in reckless disregard of the falsity of ll these claims would reconstitute argument and 74 a denial, as opposed to a confession and 25 avoidance as required by Florida law so as + +10 11 12 13 14 15 26 17 But certainly the Court understands - and was under the impression even before reading the brief by Mr. Burlington -- that the claims here were one of damage: sr i t relates to this -- allegedly se statements or statements and Rothstein together attributable to Mr. Mp n, which are brought before y could constitute + +IS 11 20 21 22 So s no applicability to defematio It generic, general wanner in defense IS phrased would not pass er as well, and any attempt to uld be futile in this Court's view use of the distinction legally between elation and malicious prosecution. + +2A14\ As far as the ninth affirmative defense + +haven't read in detail the proposed expert's report or analysis or have seen his deposition transcript -- but the Court will certainly be amenable to motions that may limit that testimony so that we do not blur the fine line between what may be construed as defamation and malicious prosecution. + +1 4 1 6 Again, it primarily relieg on which as I found earlier, 1 directly to the positlo Mr. RbStein. And the all know, is a United S on, as we preme Court decision found 18 US 322, 1974. + +:6 :8 :9 20 Ii A plaintiff may not avoid defenses that apply to defamation actions by characterizing them as torts which are not subject to those restrictions, as the Court pointed out in agreeing with the position taken by , that is, that that is not a defamation claim. + +.22 73 >5 This will not be tried as a defamation claim. And any issues as to the utilization of Mr. ' name in print linking to Mr. Rothstein and presumably -- again. I + +to constitute a valid affirmative Ism. O + +The eighth ive defense SpectfI y add, es defenses to a der ti trim. It state'', quote. cl are nothing more than n claims which are barred by applicable to defamation claims as forth in the defenses above. + +10 11 It would be similar to saying words to the \*fleet that the roles of evidence shall 22 apply to this case. That is, that there', 23 an application of the Fifth and Fourteenth 24 Amendments of the ()tilted States Constitution 15 and Article I. Section 9 of the Florida 26 Constitution guaranteeing due. process. + +is concerned, again, in agreement with the position taken by , I find that the built-in remedies that are already established in Florida law will provide any safeguards that are sought by Mr. ipstein as it relates to the punitive damages. And merely a recitation of the law does not constitute confeSSi0n or avoidance as far de the Court is concerned. + +17 In any case where punitive damages or, is brought, those built-in due process laws - is whether decisional or statutory, 20 constitutional or otherwise -- are all built 71 into the already existing Florida law. And zz the ninth affirmative defense is 23 superfluous, and it would be no reason to 24 allow the amendment. It's simply a 25 statement of the law and not a confession of avoidance. 1 + +that. And I want to present the Court with 2 So the Court finds, thereafter, th-- packets that we have presented to opposing + +3 each of the affirmative defenses would counsel. 5 defenses would not be subject to amendment it's only thick because we have provided 6 because of futility. The Court has Your Honor with the backup information. 7 add d each of these affirmative defenses In this motion, there are specific 9 in requisite detail finding that they are questions and answers, so that Your Honor 9 either in opposite, that they are contrary can very quickly take a look at the '1 to try to amend, particularly where I 31 assertions of the Fifth Amendment in '2 referenced the Gertz decision as well as the 12 response to those questions. '3 anti-trust cases that were found to be 33 4 coepletely and entirely in opposite to the 34 respond? '2 claims made here. 15 THE COURT: Sure. + +4 constitute -- the improper affirmative And while the package itself is Chic,. + +'o to established law and thus would be futile lo questions that we propose to address and the + +:6 This is not a defamation Calle. ft will 34 MS. PACKR Siesta to a represented in open Court by I'll-' ta Yeaterda aftern n. And I am happy to 9 counsel that any issues regarding the links It review th nd 0 over them and present 22 the Court has not been asked at this 22 Of ring. :. juncture to liwit any such testimony, but Is amendable Co taking up any motions In that '5 regard and will treat Cline et such time. + +not be treated as such. It has been 1/ Mr. Scarol he filed those 20 between Rothstein and are going to 20 a to the Court perhaps this afternoon be used solely for damages purposes. And 21 y when we have the Continuation of + +> 2 4 But having received them yesterday and not Prepared the, :t::noon r g new, would suggest that perhaps the + +• Again, the ninth affirmative se is 1 better place to pick back up on the pending + +2 simply a recitation of law the is 2 motions is precisely where we left off on 3 built in and well-known and en d by November 29th, which was Exhibit 9 in 4 the parties la not a co to Mr. Exhibit list. 2 avoidance, thus making ea fu i e in terms ONE COURT: i am certainly wore + +6 of attempting to amend. prepared as well to go through that. I + +2 I would as r en order confirming the would like to get a chance t0 read it. 2 side. + +8 Court's ruling, s from the 4 As you know, I do the beet I can t0 try to read everything that theme in and o needs a break? 10 familiarize myself with the context. So I t 21 going t0 sustain Ma. Rockenbach's suggestion and objection to going forward + +2 LA: WO are reedy to proceed, •r, if the Court Is ready 12 + +•• 3 .ur Honor, we had started off last 23 with this particular issue at this time. 5 Fifth Amendment. Your Honor had asked us 15 issues. I am also prepared to discuss. 4 a that we would wish to place before the jury. 28 automatic stay issue. :9 Me volunteered that we would identify the 29 So if there's any reason that + +k dealing with issues with respect to the 24 Let's g0 beck to the evidentiary 6 to -- or we had actually volunteered to 24 wall -- and I don't know whether it's still 7 specifically identify the limited questions 27 on the table -- I presume it is -- it's the + +20 limited questions that we wanted place 20 Mr. Burlington needs to be here -- because I 21 before the jury. 21 believe there's been some request that one 22 we should be focusing only on the civil 23 Mr. Burlington -- had to leave, which is why 74 claims against the three plaintiffs 24 they wanted to speak about this affirmative + +22 In light of Your Honor's statement that 22 of the attorneys -- I presume to be 25 represented by Mr. IIIIIII, we have done 25 defense issue and the denial of Epstein's + +2 3 4 i request to amend his answer. MR. SCAR0LA: Mr. Burlington, Your Honor, does not need to be here for the automatic stay issue. We wanted, for purposes of conserving his time, to be able 6 to address the one matter that he would be today, and we have done that. 8 He may or may not be able to stay any reluctantly, taking significant amount of 9 longer, but he is not required to be here time away from their businesses, jobs, '2 exhibit list, I had proposed to opposing 12 front end what may not need be done 3 counsel, and 2 think I managed -- I think 1 33 during trial. :4 referenced this with the Court also during 34 So I'm comfortab h go through '5 the hearing -- that I am prepared to agree 15 the exhibits, because may be some \* 8 that I will not reference any of those fe apparent -- et east Ow vantage 8 identifies as a problem in opening 38 should no be admitted or not admitted. '2 statement. And I won't -- I won't reference It And p ted Out -- en0 you are :0 them with a witness unless and until Your 20 r-Scar0la, in your global :3 To go through every listed exhibit and 2 I gated on november 29th, that the :4 obtain from Your Honor a ruling that 4 ppellate courts recognise what they term + +remain law here in Florida -- but that's why the overwhelming cases on the Gaubert issue. speak to actually disallowing Deubert motions, for example, from being heard during the trial for the very purpose thot just cited. And that is, that these folks. are coming in as volunteers, often '0 for the other matters. 20 families to be here with us, should not have '1 With regard to going through the 31 their time wasted if we can get done on the specific exhibits that the defense 1/ point -- re n Ty s exhibits should or Honor has made a determination that it is 21 on, that because the law, more :2 appropriate for US to do so. 22 r than in the past, haS. 441 I earlier 25 obviously is not going to de any more than the fluid nature of motions in liwine. which + +. • what I am prepared to concede to ?CcitiSir' 1 : voluntarily, respectfully does t 2 when we talk about exhibits. A through this process, e t Your and should have the opportunity that if a 7 the evidence is Bred, we will make a decision, change its mind, Or confirm the 8 determination as her a predicate 6 decision made pretrial. 2 \*Silta it i r not. So I'm willing il But T disagree that it is a waste Or '6 THE COURT: Well, couple things, and 14 through what we can go through. '7 that is this. We are always mindful -- and 67 We will do it in a little more of an '9 attorneys as well -- I know any good 19 there's something that really does need 73 efficient manner. That's why the 23 we don't waste too much time. 74 overwhelming federal cage law -- because 24 But I think we can go through those + +is essentially whet we're dealing with her- 3 sense to me. I don't know w re ing The Court will have the opportunity -- S Honor could do would to say will give contested exhibit comes to fruition during 6 a preliminary indicatio such time as the trial, to be able to either augment its '0 to th 20 time because a lot of the arguments can be In • are absolutely wasting our 11 made now. I Can digest that\* arguments. I \*2 o through the large number of 12 won't forget, and I won't forget the context 3 s that you've identified for purposes 23 of what those arguments are in relation to tting to exactly the point where I am 24 the exhibits. So 1 would like to proceed. :5 willing to move voluntarily. 15 as recommended by Epstein's counsel, to go :s I am speaking about now trial judges -- but 28 expeditious fashion, and that is, if I find 20 attorney, such as all who are sitting in 20 absolutely, without question, context for me 7: this room, are certainly well f 21 to make that decision, then I will indicate 72 ensuring that the jury's time is spent in en 22 to you that rather quickly in that regard so 25 Daubert -- we don't know if it's going to 26 with some comfort to know at least what the + +1 Court is thinking from that standpoint, + 2 perhaps ruling at this point, with the + 3 caveat that, consistent with motions in + 4 limine and the recognition by the appellate + 5 courts -- much to my delight -- that there + 6 are often situations where situations will + 7 change and context is introduced to cause + 8 the Court to, perhaps, vary its decision in + 9 some regard. But that is afforded to me + 10 once trial is underway. + +11 MR. LINK: Your Honor, before we start, + 12 can I take you up on your three-minute break + 13 opportunity, please? + +14 THE COURT: Sure. Not a problem. Take + 15 a few minutes. Come on back in about five + 16 minutes, please. + +17 (A recess was had 11:16 a.m. - 11:24 a.m.) + +18 MR. SCAROLA: May I make a procedural + 19 inquiry, Your Honor? + +20 THE COURT: Yes. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: I assume that we are + 22 starting on page 23 of Jeffrey Epstein's + 23 revised omnibus motion in limine. Is that + 24 correct? + +25 THE COURT: That's what I am + +1 understanding. + +2 Ms. Rockenbach? + +3 MR. SCAROLA: That's where we left off. + +4 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes. The exhibit + 5 section, which should be letter B. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: Well, the specific + 7 exhibits that you are objecting to are + 8 identified in this motion, correct? + +9 MS. ROCKENBACH: Actually, we + 10 stopped -- we left off at Mr. [REDACTED] + 11 exhibit list and we are on number nine. + +12 The revised omnibus motion in limine + 13 identified examples of the objections that + 14 we had. And we have listed and filed our + 15 objections to the exhibit list. + +16 THE COURT: Where is the list of + 17 exhibits? + +18 MR. SCAROLA: If you have an extra + 19 copy, I need one also, please. I gave mine + 20 to Sonja at the end of the last hearing. + 21 And I was assuming we were going to be + 22 basing this discussion on the motion. + +23 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, may I + 24 approach? I have a copy for Mr. Scarola. + 25 It is Mr. Edward's amended exhibit list that + +1 we were reviewing. + +2 THE COURT: I actually have it. + 3 Thanks. + +4 MS. ROCKENBACH: You do. Okay. + +5 Our objections were filed November 15. + 6 That's obviously a separate document. + +7 THE COURT: That, I will take. + +8 MR. LINK: Your Honor, they are listed + 9 in the motion starting on page three. + +10 THE COURT: I thought those were just + 11 exemplars. + +12 MR. LINK: In the omnibus motion in + 13 limine, it actually lists, I think, every + 14 single one of the exhibits. They are + 15 identified in here. So they are in two + 16 places. + +17 THE COURT: Page three of the revised + 18 omnibus motion in limine? + +19 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, it's the + 20 original omnibus -- + +21 THE COURT: Is that part of the -- + +22 MR. SCAROLA: If we are working with + 23 the witness list -- I mean with the exhibit + 24 list, we will just work with the exhibit + 25 list. + +1 THE COURT: Let's do that. + +2 MR. LINK: That works for us, Your + 3 Honor. + +4 THE COURT: Thanks. + +5 MR. SCAROLA: So I assume we are going + 6 to take these one at a time? + +7 THE COURT: Yeah. + +8 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, the next + 9 one that we were on was number nine, + 10 Mr. Epstein's flight logs -- if I may + 11 approach, I would like to give Your Honor + 12 what was provided to my office from + 13 Mr. Scarola. And it is a sampling, because + 14 I think there were over 200 pages for this + 15 particular exhibit. + +16 We've objected on the basis of + 17 relevance, of 90.403, judicial value. And + 18 these are flight logs of my client's planes. + 19 They have no relevance to what is being + 20 tried in this case, which is malicious + 21 prosecution. + +22 Mr. [REDACTED] testified that he knew that + 23 his clients were not on my client's plane, + 24 so the flight logs are completely + 25 irrelevant. + +THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Scar0la. + +2 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Your Honor, one of 3 the alleged bases for Jeffrey Epstein having 4 concluded that was a knowing participant in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme is 6 that the scope of the discovery that 7 was seeking once he became a member of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firs 9 expanded to include matters that he waa not previously focusing on and which had no reasonable bards to lead to the discovery of :2 admissible evidence. + +:3 So he alleged that the abusive discovery that engaged in '5 gave him reason to believe that he was only :6 doing those things because he was knowingly supporting the Ponta scheme. + +So obviously has an '9 opportunity to explain what he did and why to he did it. Yes, I was seeking discovery with regard to the airplane flight logs and :2 who was On the airplane. And the reason why :3 I did that was because, even though my 01,01 :4 clients were not transported on the plane, 25 know that Other young woven were transported + +3 4 6 on the plane for purposes of pros and sexual abuse. And I can p through the flight loge the occupants on the tarots children who were Dein Jeffrey Epstein. + +7 Part of wh federal claim is interne kes this is a viable restate and Cation or children for pu prostitution. el law, specifically Pectoral + +:6 :8 -- excuse me 415.5(g) -- and I ed this in an earlier argument to Court -- expressly allows the introduction into evidence in any case involving a sexual offense against a child, the commission of any other sexual offense against a child. + +:9 70 71 72 25 So, I was seeking evidence to prove a pattern of abuse of children including their transportation for purposes of prostitution. And I was doing that through flight loge that identified these children, flight logs that identified other witnesses, taking the depositions of pilots. And so all of this + +10 That's what he alleges. In tact. portions of the deposition of have already been identified by thr defense as they're intending to introduce this in evidence before the jury. + +11 12 13 24 15 111 13 I have sore of those excerpts, if you Your Manor needs to take a 1 at them. They are offing that evi th regard t these setters as part tt for the lack of probable emu- to conduct this y he assertion that this w discovery process. + +It 20 21 How, they alleged in their complaint, specific allegations are in the complaint. Those are false a. + +22 COORS: Show me those allegation: 2 CT you are suggesting. + +is information than rebuts the assertion by Jeffrey Epstein that this was an abusive discovery effort that supported toy conclusion that was a knowing participant in the Pons' scheme. + +MR. 9CARR:A: pros the complaint. Your Honor. or from the deposition testimony? + +10 11 MR. SCAROLA: It's a little bit difficult for Your Honor to see on these copies what the defense has designated. but on page 153 it \*torte et line two and continues through -- it looks like the bottom of that page. And then on 276, 277, 278 and 279, it's most of all of those pages. + +ft 13 24 15 Then in the complaint, the allegation in paragraph 35 -- and I will pause, if Your Honor would like so to do that, while you are reading that. + +16 17 /HE COURT: If you will, take a moment . Monks. + +18 19 20 21 22 I don't see much as far as what is set forth in the latter pages of the deposition of Mr. that even mentions the plane or its connection with the alleged underage/ individuals on that plane. + +23 24 23 Let me look at the complaint. Paragraph? MR. SCAROLA: Thirty-three. 34, ?f, In. + +7101 COURT: Either way, or both. MR. SCAROLA: Let se do both, then. THE COURT: 'thanks. + +THE COURT: Okay. This is directed to 2 primarily to Xr. Rothstein. It says 'and 3 others.' Rut it says, quote -- paragraph 4 34 -- Upon information and belief. Rothstein and others claimed their investigators + +6 discovered that there were high-prof ile 7 individuals onboard Epstein's private lc. 8 where sexual assaults took place and shoved 9 03 -- and possibly others -- copies of a flight log purportedly containing names of celebrities, dignitaries and international figures. + +3 Remind me who is 03? :4 XS. ROCRENSACH: One of the investing '2 companies that was being defrauded by :6 Rothstein. + +THE COURT: Okay. I have read those + +other ones. Are there any other — '9 ER. SCAROLA: Paragraph 35, Your Honor, 90 then specifically references the litigation team. M you recall, the litigation team is 2.2 defined as including + +THE COURT: Thirty-five. For instance, 24 the litigation team relentlessly and 25 knowingly pursued flight data and passenger + +4 6 7 a manifests regarding flights Rpm with famous individuals know that no undereged women we illicit activities took and the litigation to attempted to take the Celebrities In bolster the mark Coin rop aaaaa ly one of these enlaced effort to am that was taking + +:2 :3 place. d. SCAROLA: I don't know if Your ook a look at 36, but that's a fit reference to Mr. and his conduct of the discovery, and then 42(k). a a0-something that was + +:6 :8 :9 20 21 22 >3 71 25 THE EMU: Thirty-six. One of Plaintiffs' counsel, deposed three of Epstein's pilots, and sought the deposition of a fourth pilot. The pilots were deposed by for over 12 hours, and never asked one question relating to or about R.M., L.M. and Jane Doe as it related to transportation on flights of PM clients on any of Epstein's planes. Rut asked many inflammatory and + +22 Honor, that having made those allegations in the complaint, ally allegations that no assault:1 f to t 4 hat that was untrue. He knew that children place on the plane, Mr. Epstein knew N were being assaulted on the plane. He knew + +loading irrelevant questions about the pilots' thoughts and beliefs, which could only have been asked for the purposes of pumping -- that word is used in quotes - the cases and thus by using the deposition, to sell the cases -- or a part of them -- to third parties, end quote. + +62(k). Told investigators, as reported + +in an Associated Press article, that celebrities and other famous people had flown on Epstein's plane when assaults took place. Therefore, even tho none of PM's clients claim they flew in's planes, the litigation teen s nd flight logs. Why? Again we the investment pump, enquote. y without any relevance t claims made by PEA the elle + +Our pOSitiOn, obviously. + +7 + +20 12 23 24 15 26 SO the flight lOgS are clearly relevant and material for that purpose, as is all of the evidence with regard to what Mr. Epstein knew was occurring on those airplanes. And that directly contradicts what is included in this complaint as a basis for his belief that was fabricating these claims. + +11 + +27 28 is THE COURT: Thanks, Mr. Sterol.. MS. ROCKEIIBACE: Your Honor, may 1 use the Elmo for a minute? + +20 22 23 24 23 THE COURT: Sure. MS. ROCREHRACH: I really appreciated Mr. Link's presentation this morning based on the law, because after the november 29th hearing, I went back and I spent a good part of the weekend looking at malicious + +21 + +that there were high-profile individuals wh' were present on the plane. And had a reasonable basis to conduct this discovery pursuant to applicable Florida law and applicable federal law as well as, because it was reasonably calculated to teed to the discovery of admissible evidence. + +prosecution cases, because I thought I must 3 something, because all I hear Mr. Scarola in 4 court saying is he's going to prove that the allegations In the original proceeding that 6 my client filed are false. And I never knew + +trial. The Debrincat case actually has the :2 most guiding principle in it for this Court, 3 which is going to, I think superimposes the Mr. ' lawsuits on behalf of the three + +3 6 9 course of judicial proceedings. So when Mr. Scare's pulls complaint, my client's or ng and wants to parse thro allegations or Paragra I'm going to prove that that stet s false and You Should neve it, that's net what the malicious pr u on law says. That's not wha ^ are h to do. + +:6 :8 :9 20 21 .22 23 And, In fact, that's the Liabos case that Your Honor discussed with us back on November 29th, where there's a mixed question of fact of law, Your Honor has to do that threshold determination of If there's any question or dispute of those facts that my client relied on were not in existence. It the facts existed, then you have to determine, as the Court, whether my client had sufficient probable cause. + +21 25 So what are the facts that my client relied on? They are not the flight logs. + +for Your Honor to decide as a d er, whether the facts that my ifionibly relied on existed et the commenced the original proceeding. + +10 I see why it's a focus, though, because Mr. Sterol\* wants to try other cases. This is not a sexual abuse case. It is not a federal court action, a Crime Victims' Rights action. It's not even a defamation case, which Your Honor clearly stated thy morning when denying the affirmative defenses related to defamation. + +11 32 11 34 15 ti So to allow flight logs into this malicious prosecution case i ompletely irrelevant to the issue er the fact:. that sy client reliad an he fled the original proceedin ve n existence at the time that he f + +orr 39 The f the there was a civil action f feicure proceeding against Rothstein edyith the D.S. Attorney's 20 o that the ROChStein's firs wag 21 ; that Mr. held himself 22 out Partner in 01;8 firs; that 9 \ Mr had the three lawsuits, which - even concedes in his most recent depOs1t100 -- were used by Mr. Rothstein r + +He's not relying on those flight logs. That's a complete red herring for the Court. + +1S 1 + +10 31 12 The Racorbeek lawsuit, brought by Mr. Bill Scherer, down in Fort LaVderdale, who was quoted in a newspaper article, NY Client read and relied on that said Mr. Rothstein was tricking investors. He 23 used Rpstein's cases as a showpiece and 24 bait. Mitch Rpsteln Cases? The one that 15 had. + +fabricate -- and that's the word that Mr. testified to under oath -- to fabricate -- and create a fantasy. That was another word Mr. used. + +?hose facts, did they exist? it sounds like we're in agreement. Those facts existed. + +14 So the flight logs are irrelevant. 17 They are far astray from what we are here to 18 try. And they are an attempt to open up 39 some other lawsuit, sexual -- + +20 By the way, the three clients of 21 Mr. Mr. concedes, were 22 not -- you never heard Mr. Scarola deny 23 that -- because Mr. conceded, they 24 are not on my client's planes. + +25 So this, like many of the other + +exhibits, your Honor, suit be precluded, 2 because they are wholly irrelevant. And if there was any remote probative value, they 4 ore prejudicial to talk about flight loos and celebrities who may have been on my 6 client's planes. + +2 THE CORRY: I think that the issue itself -- meaning the tangential allegations 9 that were made that mentioned flight logs or mentioned the good faith discovery aspects of Mr. ' plight relating to his three :2 clients -- has some relevancy. + +11 However, the flight logs themselves would be subject to -- and the Court is '2 sustaining at this juncture the relevancy objection, and also a 403 objection, and that is, that while mentioning the fact that :0 Mr. In good faith whatever the case say have been -- sought these flight 20 logs as part of his discovery process representing the three young woven, at the 22 Some time the Court has expressly indicated :3 Its significant reservations. And in fact. 24 it's condemnation of trying either those 2s cases in this courtroom -- es for as the + +1 4 malicious prosecution case is con or more importantly, that we a potentially constructively underaged or over the a albeit potential semis aims .• in this forum. + +:6 MR. SCAROLR: Your Honor? May I raise a question. + +:8 :9 THE COURT: Briefly. MR. SCAR01A: Thank you. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 Do I understand the Court's ruling to be that Mr. is going CO be able to explain why he was seeking the discovery he was seeking, why he was seeking the flight logs, the fact that he did obtain flight logs that confirmed independent information + +So again, it may become relevant as to why Mr. E at about his buaineS seski Out thou flight lOge In good faith discovery, the flight ma\* s. In this Court's respectful upon its ruling, ere irrelevant. there's any probative value at all. y would be materially outweighed by the prejudice of 403. + +about children being transported on the airplane? THE COURT: The latter IS the one th will have to be discussed further, again. as I pointed out earlier, when the context comes up and it's introduced or attempted to be introduced outside the presence of the jury. + +To the, what I perceive to be three 10 questions, the two former questions, the 21 answer would be yes. + +12 MR. SCAROLA: Will the rt take 21 Judicial notice of Vlori to 90.404 14 (2), which is cosmos' reed as the 15 Rule, and V Rule 41900, 14 which expressly t introduction of 1/ evidence wi other sexual as assaults dren, so that the jury IT is &&&&& he act that Mr. IIIIIII, not 20 a deed faith basis to conduct this 21 but quite arguably would have 22 bee Osonly negligent to have failed to pu ue it? + +2A V 4 N THE COURT: The only thing I would say to that. Mr. Sterol\*, is I don't want to six + +2 • 20 11 32 23 apples and oranges. And that is, I don't want to place the Court's incrisinator on getting too far afield and turning this into a case about alleged sexual exploitation, particularly of others, outside of Mr. ' representation. That would serve only co inflame the jury, and, again, would cause the playing field to become unleveled, because the defense to the malicious prosecution Clefs, i.e.. EpStein and his attorneys, would have to be fighting elms, that thif ray not even know about much, such less the ones that they do. + +14 15 IS 22 Ie 19 20 21 22 23 24 SO again. I want to center on those three claims that were brought by Mr. on behalf of his clients, and center on those aspects that would be relevant to the malicious prosecution claim and the alleged ginning up of those claims, the alleged attempt to align himself with Rothstein, the alleged attempt to factor these cases, potentially Mr. conduct as it related to those factoring matters. + +23 MR. SCAROLA: I u -- I or -orr•• ' + +didn't mean to interrupt. Clear, and that is, that the relationship 5 your question regarding the cases that talk befits the dignity of the courtroom, without 2 subsequent similar acts, those cases are nor, obviously, as to the three plaintiff: + +2 Till:COURT: What I'm trying to say In between the legitimacy of the three 3 things like flight logs, the danger of elates -- t..X., E.N. and Sane Doe -- are 4 unfair prejudice. And also, in -- to answer going to be permitted in a manner that 6 about the prior similar acts or perhaps even pejorative commentary as to Mr. Epstein, a from the forum of which the actual criminal at issue. 9 claim, or perhaps even a civil claim that And as conceded by Epstein in his + +.8 stems from the alleged assault, is being lc papers, once Mr. Mr. :sink and Xs. Rockenbach :1 heard. 31 became involved to the ratter, and that is, :2 Again, what I'm trying to emphasize is 12 there's no conceivable way t those issues '5 directly or indirectly, whether purposefully 15 his deposition testimo o the extent that :6 or not, inflame this jury. it he testified. d t i that these three Epstein's phone records. 21 gin up, overexaggerate, whatever 22 I approach, Your 22 the a way be, the value Of those Cases t0 :3 Honor? And I can swap with the court 2 t e investors, whatever damage was caused 0 Epstein as a result thereof. + +:3 that I do not want to introduce tangential 11 can be ignored, because ature of :4 matters into this ease which would either 14 Mr. Epatetn's announc ense well et. + +.2 So that is the ruling of the Court. IT cases were a of s• type of an :es I want to move forward now on to the :8 Sieber:et scheme y Rothstein and others, '1 next issue that's being objected to, that is It including 1 tuition team -- which is :a what is generically listed as Jeffrey 20 . as Including -- to Somehow + +24 Exhibits 10 and 9, the phone records that 25 were produced to my office by Mr. Sterol\*. So that's the clear unadulterated + +I + +• Your Honor, the objection is ical 1 ruling of the Court as to that issue. 2 to the last in that they are n 2 Xs. SCARCE-A: And I understand that. 3 My client's phone records, th a any sir. My question to you is, if there is . 4 remote relevance as to y e may specific allegation in the complaint -- 5 have called on any giv day. n't think ?XX COURT: That was brought by 6 that's going to be -- I it's Mr. Epstein. 7 prejudicial. 1 k there's a danger of MR. SCAROLA: -- that was brought by + +8 prejudicing this y. 6 Mr. Epstein against Mr. , does You-:2 ey th k we may hear that there is going 12 use to prove it's false, is there any issue 3 to ome attempt to prove the falsity of 13 about the tact that if he alleged it in the individual allegation in the original 24 complaint and It's false. we get to prove + +9 T t gut sure whet relevance il Honor's ruling contemplate that we get to .0 Mr. •r thinks that phone records have 20 prove that allegation is false? Without • t 11 us prosecution action, unless 11 getting into whit exhibit we are going to :5 proceeding, which is not what we should be 15 it's false? + +:6 doing here in this action. 16 THE COURT: There's no issue as far 6 + +:2 THE COURT: Thank you. 17 I am concerned. 20 are not here to prove the falsity of claims 20 hearing something entirely different 2: in the original complaint. 21 repeatedly free the other side. I didn't 72 I would like some guidance from the 22 understand how they can possibly be makinv + +:te MR. SCAROLA: I am -- I continue to be 28 MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. t think :: extremely puzzled by that statement, that we 16 that helps a great deal, because I have been .74 THE COURT: No need to be puzzled. I 24 prove the falsity of every false allegation + +23 Court. 23 that argument that we weren't permitted to 25 think I've already made myself abundantly 23 in the complaint. + +THE COURT: My intent Is to hold 2 Mr. Hostel': accountable -- as I try to 1- 2 each and every day, no wetter whether I, litigant or attorney -- and that is, what they writ\*, they are going to have to stand 6 behind. And t have got no issues in flit-7 respect at all. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. Them' 9 very helpful. I appreciate that clarification. + +TMR COURT: Now, again, the mere fact that Mr. Epstein mentions flight logs in his '3 complaint does not ipso facto make the :a entire flight log disclosure relevant to the '5 jury's consideration of the claims. + +:6 So I want to temper my broad statement by that example as it ray constitute .8 examples in other matters that he's claimed. + +'9 But generally, globally, yes. The :o accountability Saline le still resonating with the Court, and will always resonate for as long as I am doing this. :2 + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank yOU, sir. I 00 appreciate that clarification. I'm sorry to 25 the extent that any of that may seem to be + +reasonable person would bring this civil proceedings? That's what the case law says. THR COURT: Row else is that testing. Mr. Link, but for the actual allegations that were brought? + +Someone could be conjuring up any thought process that they ray have to possibly bring a claim. But it's not until that black and l= document is served on someone and a filing fee is paid, and the 21 litigation commences -- and as contemplated 22 13 la 35 by the jury instructions and the law - continued by the defends malicious prosecution claim, th &incite, to make this at all + +ti 37 Is MR. LINK: I th IFen answer that question ve a ly, d here is why -- and you rats a reel good point. + +It 20 You, S role absolutely gets to So here Is when Is lipStein'S is filed, December 7th, 2009. ting to you that if you read the ewe Court case that just came out, it ill tell you what happen, afterwards is all aubject to the litigation privilege. + +6 7 9 that very, very briefl TIIK COURT: Sure. ir. YR. LINK: that way and we' ted that ruling. We don't ag61 that t's what the law VO heard the Court rule SU that's the playing field that se or us. + +:6 COURT: The playing field being - n you don't agree is exactly what, so t we can maybe clarify whatever your disagreement is so that neither of us or any of us are working under any false pretenses. + +: :9 70 71 MR. LINK: Your Honor, we don't believe that truth or falsity of any specific allegation has anything to do with malicious prosecution. It has everything to do with defamation. Here is why. + +z2 23 25 we believe that malicious prosecution focuses on the information that you make the decision to go forward with the lawsuit. Did you have enough information that a + +argument after Your Honor has rul helps me a great deal. het + +TNN COURT: Let's move . Y.N. LINK: Your Ho gnment on 2 TER COURT: Which Supreme Court case you are talking about? + +10 21 12 XS. ROCKIDIRACH: Under headnote one. KR. LINK: -- that everything that happens after 12/7/09 IS protected, it's subject to privilege. What the allegation, are, the truth or falsity, any statements made by the lawyers, any statements made by the parties or witnesses. + +23 24 THE COURT: Hold on just a moment. What about, though, extra judicial 15 statements? The Debrincat case, the Wol fa IS case, for case that we had, was confined to 27 issues dealing with the litigation itself. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Debrincat. MR. LINK: It's the first thing it says -- + +18 The concern that Wolfe had was 19 primarily one of chilling effect on the 20 ability of, in that case, a rather 21 well-known law firm in Miami and their 22 ability to properly litigate their case 23 without feeling -- feeling tethered by that. + +24 What transpires outside of the 25 litigation, are you suggesting to me, would + +not be relevant, meaning publication, things 2 of that nature, things that this expert is 3 going to say in terms of damages caused to as a result of this filing and its continuation. + +6 YR. LINK: We are on two different 7 points then. + +8 THE COURT: Sorry. I may have 9 misunderstood. + +MR. LINK: You got it, but you are on two different points, so let me tell you '2 this. + +'3 The extra ?edictal statements -- and 4 it's a great example. Rpstein sues for '5 abuse of process, RICO, whatever he sues 6 for. Outside of the courtroom kr. Epstein stands up and says to a reporter, 8 Mr. Is a thief. There's no pert of that statement that's connected to the 30 litigation. He doesn't have immunity. + +He makes a statement about the 22 litigation, and hO says, I hove alleged 23 was connected to Rothstein's pond 24 scheme. He says ft outside of the SS courtroom. IS that Connected to the + +litigation? Yes, it is. So I don't think the law 3 all. And i don't think Mr. 4 dispute it if you asked 5 litigation privilege p 6 happens in a lawsuit th \*sties, 7 witnesses, levy connected to the Hlti d efything that nd judge, that are ion. He would Say, Canoe -- he said it in he said it in this courtroom Imes -- all of that is :2 by the litigation privilege. + +:3 SCAROLA: No. There is one tion. And the one exception is continuing to maintain the lawsuit in the :6 absence of probable cause. That's one 7 exemption. Everything else is protected by :8 the litigation privilege. The one thing :9 that is not, the one exemption carved out of 20 the litigation privilege by every court, up until the Third CCA decided otherwise, and 92 the Fourth OCA issued its opinion, every i3 other court in the nation has said you rs cannot maintain a lawsuit in the absence of 25 probable cause. You can't file it in the + +It 20 + +absence of probable cause. + +THE COURT: You're bringing back bad semories. tf t heard that once, I heard it a thousand times. I think that's why Judge went out of our -- very kind way -- I am saying that with an abundant amount of respect. I think she's an exceptional appellate judge -- she stated that the trial court correctly followed the Wolfe decision. Off the record. + +IA discussion was held off the record.) TI4ECCE/RT: I do need a oak. I hate to break you in the midd thought, but I do have some lunch 1 t to make sure that I respect It's about five or so after noo back, please. assembled + +What another t , going to give you this afternoon. So we whenever we start and two hours + +at I would like to do is try to get ugh as much Of this as we can. + +My Continued suggestion is to work with each other, if you can, as far as any of + +92 + +these exhibits say be concerned. And then what I will do is -- if you are prepared to do it -- is get into the motion to stay i' we have time to do that today, okay? + +MR. GOLDBERGER: Judge, i apologise. So Pm kind of responsible for the stay motion, and I'm juggling a couple of ball, right now. I'm not going to be here this afternoon. I got called up for trial. I have to go prepare for that. + +Ona personal level, son and daughter-In-law, their due date IS today. ' think it's happening so -- + +24 vol COURT: If you would have told -0 IS that. I would have been able to hear it 16 before we did this evidence Issue, becauee 27 think I mentioned earlier that I was 28 prepared to do this today. + +19 You know, my suggestion is probably 20 that either Mr. Link or Ms. Roekenbach mould 21 argue it in your absence. + +22 I will be glad to take it up the first 23 thing this afternoon, Jack, if it will help 24 you. But, you know -- + +23 MR. OOLDSKRGER: I apologize for not + +telling you ahead of tire. 1 IN the CUCUTA' WW1 Om NE 2 THE COURT: I understand. You have a 3 lot on your mind and t respect that. Rut at . Case No. 501009C4040600XXXXIS 4 the same time, I told the parties before. 5 you know, I as slammed, and t have to me 6 this stuff pushed through in the best way 1 9 can describe it. So I'm going to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, 8 insist that you make yourself available. + +919T2224111 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND IW PALM DRAWN COUNTY, =BID.% + +&TYRE? EPSTEIN, . PLaintirt/Couftter-Dereedeett , individually, + +9 I will be willing to do it, as I said, Defaxients/Counter-Plaintiff. '0 first thing out of the gate. I don't expect 10 / '1 it to take very long. I'm expecting it to it Mae :t '2 be about a 15-minute argument per side. And 13 3 I will get you out of here, to the best of 4 my ability, by 2:00 in the afternoon, as s6 DATE MEN: Tuesday, 5th, '5 long as there's no unforeseen circumstance. TIME: 10:02 a.m. 5 p.n. + +II + +14 TRANSCRIPT OT PeCCEED" 9 + +is f1 PUCE 205 Y. Rem ICC Les Paln h, Florida 7 co-counsel. It BEItRE: Nate', Pmestdirq MAT:, + +:6 MR. GOLDBERGER: Let me talk to + +8 MR. SCAROLA: I can do my argument in is 9 five minutes on that issue. + +This cause en be heard at the tin:, ard piece 20 aforesaid. the following proceedings were rape + +:0 /NM COURT: I don't think it'll going t0 take more than 15 minutes CO present, then it :2 five on the rebUttal. So I'm telling you :3 right now, we can get it done in less than 2 645 Ir.Beech lakes Boulevard, Suite 100) :4 half an hour, i will be glad to do that. t Nest Palm Beach, FL 33401 55 will give you every accommodation, as I + +12 Souls D. Beech Reporting Service, 7nc. 15611 471-2995 ' + +• would with any of you here. I the 1 THE COURT: Continue on with the 2 same thing. 2 discussion. Mr. Link, you were in + +I Rut I need to respect f th r mid-thought. i prepared in accordance ith t formation here to do the stay. 6 that I received from Co sterday in TNIt COURT: Let's go ahead end take , the manner whiC is that as the next e- as Care Of that. 8 the next viable o review and -- I 8 Mr. Goldberger. 3 haven't 0 thr0 the supplement motions il MR. 03LDRERGER: Thank you tor tenon o to c t. That is what I was planning 20 me out Of Order. One of those days I hay-In day. 21 SO much going on. + +4 I've put aside this ti t ve ER. SCAROLA: I think Mr. Goldberger is + +2 sorry about that. Again, it is 12 INK COURT: I completely understand. 3 due respect to your long experience 23 thank you also for adjusting your schedule the fact i think you're an excellent 14 as u011. 5 lawyer and a great person, so it's not 25 All right, let me got my materials :6 personal at all, it's just needing to get 26 ready for that aspect of the case. t think 7 this done. 27 I am ready to go. Please proceed. + +:0 Thank you. And thank you all for la MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, Honor. So 7: IA recess was had 12:09 p.m. - 1:25 p.m.) 21 important for us to kind of discuss first 72 22 with the Court what it is that we are 73 23 seeking to have resolved before this gaze -- SI 24 we would like to see it proceed. + +:9 understanding. I appreciate that. See you 39 we have a motion t0 stay your proceedings 20 back assembled at 1:20. 20 pending at this time. I think it's + +Mr. Scarola, in a prior hearing, had 2 mentioned that this is not just about the 3 resolution of the MIA. Mr. Epstein perhaps 4 has other matters that he could potentially 5 have criminal liability concerning in other 6 jurisdictions that would not be covered by 7 the NPA, which is part of the CUBA. + +8 THE COURT: Let's put on the record 9 exactly what you're speaking about so that if anyone needs to review this they :1 understand these acronyms completely. + +:2 MR. GOLDBERGER: So the first matter we '3 have, Your Honor, is what has been referred :4 to as the CVRA case. That is the Crime '5 Victims' Reporting Isicl Act. And that :6 matter Ss being litigated in federal court in the Southern District of Florida court before Judge Marra. + +MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. Since we are 20 doing this for purposes of the record, think that you may have mistaken. CVRA IS :2 not cribs victims' reporting act. It is the 21 Crime Victims' Rights. + +24 Ml. DoLDRERDER: Thank you very m 25 I appreciate that, Mr. Sterol,. uch. is It 20 21 22 agreement and subject Mr. Epstein ty criminal prosecution for a matter that he has already pled guilty to. + +It tugs at the very, very cornerstone. of due process, Your Honor. But as a criminal defense attorney with a lot of years doing this, I have to act cautiously, because of one thing that Judge Marra said. + +Judge Marra, in one of the orders in 10 this case, indicated that setting aside 11 the non-prosecution agreement is somethin2 12 that he would consider. + +23 So I would be rests Id 24 committing malpractic mile my 15 client to testify in m era in your lawsuit before Your Ho r In tt s that would be 12 part of the n oaec ion agreement. So that's ki or prpcedurally where we are right no + +I wanted to clarify for the Court, are not seeking to stay this Case reason other than matters that are ained within the non-prosecution greed:enc. + +NOR. Mr. Scarola has made reference r + +3 4 5 6 So that matter concerning th is pending before Judge Werra Southern District of Plori matter, Mr. as at n for three individuals C d Jane Dot Number I, who happen to case are see of setting aside non-pro tion agrewnt. I case caved in this the unprecedented remedy + +'0 record, we need to establish non-prosecution agreement in :2 ace t t prevents the VS Attorney's Office :3 southern District of Florida in ng forward on any criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein related to certain enumerated :6 offenses if Mr. Epstein complies with his :7 non-prosecution agreement. + +Mr. Epstein has compiled with all parts :9 of that non-prosecution agreement. He has 20 served a sentence that was part of that 2: non-prosecution agreement, and he's going about his life. + +73 In an unprecedented action, '4 Mr. on behalf of these individuals, 25 is seeking to set aside that non-prosecution 2 + +potential prosecutions in other jurisdictions: New York, US Virgin Island:, many other places. That is not what this stay motion is about. + +THE COURT: But isn't that critical to the analysis as to at least one prong of the required elements that the Court is expected to look into, and that is, the length of time that the delay is being sought? + +Because even though the argument that you're making fits within a certain perimeter, and somewhat similar to the discussions we had last week about each side wanting to frame their respective cases in the manner that they see fit -- and I respect that because they are advocates - but from the Court's perspective, from the general public's perspective, from the perspective of Mr. , when it comes to Mr. Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment, whether or not the parameters that you're seeking in your motion only applies in the 0PA at issue here, that save potentiality of criminal prosecution in any of these jurisdictions where -- not being a + +Criminal defense lawyer, i am not going to 2 sit here and try to estimate what the 3 statute of limitations are for these t)T. 4 of alleged criminal activity -- + +S And again, I am not accusing anybody of 6 anything. I want that to be clear. You 7 brought up these other jurisdictions and the 8 potentialities. I don't know what those 9 statute of limitations are. I only know that in my limited experience when it comes to these types of potential claims or :2 potential charges, that the statutes are 3 typically extraordinarily longer, :4 particularly when minors are involved for '5 very obvious reasons. + +:6 So while the parameters that you are suggesting may be your intent, that when a :8 broader perspective Is looked upon, it's '9 very possible that the sane outcome that. 20 i.e., the invocation of the Fifth • Amendment -- which I respect. I understand. 22 and fully intend to comply with his ability 23 to invoke the Fifth when appropriate - - we 24 don't know when that ends. + +25 MR. GOLDBERGER: I have a simple answer + +3 4 6 for that, Your Honor. And I have ere and very carefully listened to pronouncements and the way handled this hearing an have had. And you hew indite eC that what's in play in this a C.M., T.M.. that we and Jane Doe Nu I. lbose are the Individuals that e indicated you are going t a low to mony concerning. Those '0 are a Same individuals that are in 's 411 we care about. + +:2 COURT: Excuse me for interrupting, 3 want to make sure that this is L.M. and Jane Doe -- these three individuals are now over the age of IS. + +:6 Have they agreed to have their names 7 utilized at this point? :8 Mr. scarola, do you wish to comment on 9 that? Do you know? + +20 Y.R. SCAROIA: I cannot speak authoritatively about that, Your Honor. 72 THE COURT: My preference, Mr. Goldberger, is to continue to go ahead 24 and use the initials until I'm comfortable, 25 because the criminal charges that were 71 + +10 11 brought, SS you have recited thew -- again, I appreciate the fact that you were here last week to help with those aspects - those criminal charges pertain to them when they were minors. So I don't want to, by way of convenience or otherwise, suggest without a full agreement or something that' going to satisfy the Court, that they are willing to have their names utilized, even at this juncture, because my comfort love' at this point is not high. + +22 11 24 15 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: 1 100 cent understand. I have live ase for 10 years. These names h throughout both the al litigation 6,1 the litigation s. + +27 15 THE Marra, t e case before Judge ye been used? + +15 20 21 HR. : They have not been. SCAR01-A: Your Honor, if I may, 6: ht about it. It le my belief that Only one EPetein victim who has ntarlly agreed that her :lase may be ed. and that is + +10 11 come out of this is getting those names and listening to thoie name\*, I don't know any of these young ladies. I don't know any of their remilies. The name, don't Sound a bit familiar to me. SO at least I don't have to worry about that. + +22 13 Mr. Link. did you want to add anything? MR. LINK: if I might. + +14 15 The witness list of Mr. actually names these folks by nese. + +1t 27 MR. SCARO:J1: That was inadvertent. Your Honor, and we plan to address it. + +le 19 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. MR. LINK: The second thing, with YO,2,- + +20 21 22 23 24 23 Honor's permission, we brought the plea. You were asking about it last tura what the actual counts were, and I have a copy of the non-prosecution agreement, which I can provide to the Court. We have the actual documents. + +The others, I'm almost certain, have + +not -- and in fact, when the deposition was recently taken of C.M., it was with the expressed stipulation that she would be referred to in the record by those initials. ?RR COURT: The Only positive that's + +2 THE COURT: Thank you. I appreciate that. + +] 9 MR. LIKE: We will file them so they're part of the court record. + +S THE COURT: For the today, I'm going to 6 ask our court reporter -- absent any Mr. Scarola's argument. 8 simply amend the record so that only the I know what's coming. ghat we started this. 9 Initials are used, please, so that we don't THE COURT: And that's critical, '0 have the names specifically stated. And 10 because but for Mr. Rpstein's action in + +I who is the counter-plaintiff in this case. So Mr. Epstein is put between the proverbial rock and a hard place in this situation, Your Honor. + +THE COURT: You know the thrust of + +7 objection from respective counsel -- to MR. GOLDBERGER: I know what's coming. + +'1 hearing no objection. 11 bringing this lawsuit in 2009 and amending :8 level is satisfied, I want to do everything la summary judgment that ltime ly brought :6 the Jane tee as the third individual. 16 judgment resul nq t f -- that is, ii interrupting you. 28 Mr. Rpsto n -- t a never would have been an + +'2 We may need to address this later on 12 his complaint In 2011. and t failing t, '3 down the line. But again, until my comfort 21 address in any fashion t n for '5 we can to continue to use their initials or 25 by Mr. against . Epstein and a + +'7 Again, Mr. Goldberger, I apologise for 29 judgment of -sal f the claim by + +'9 Ye. GOtDBERGER: And I apologies if the It issue. we re dealing with now would :0 names were mentioned. 20 ve been an ISSUO. + +THE COURT: That's Okay. 21 •n certainly understand, and I :3 to answer the Court's well-founded question, 2 re on if Mr. had brought some type + +22 MU. GOLDBERGER: Anyhow, Judge -- but 22 bel there would be firmer footing to :4 is there any finality to the request for a a t claim against Mr. Epstein, lot's say. 2s stay, and the answer is that Your Honor has some type of defamation claim -- 7 am not + +(ISPHASI:SV • ruled already that the testimony ill 1 suggesting there are any grounds for that. 2 be allowed in this trial is t c f 2 I am just giving an example -- if he had 1 these three individuals; th er v same brought a defamation claim against 8 three individuals who a et Mr. Epstein for things that may have 5 attempt to set aside t non-p 0 ',Button resulted from extra judicial statements that + +6 agreement. may have been made by Mr. Epstein to the + +7 So 7 want ke it clear to the Court press, to whomever, to third parties, 8 our request for a a a limited request 6 published, and had some damage t0 9 [Or a S y, until ch time as the CVRA case 5 Mr. r I could understand the o is r 01 And it has nothing to 10 with 10 interplay and the potential strategic leg women who may be making claim. 21 decisions that would have been made by :2 •ain't r. Epstein. And that becomes even 12 Mr. in. on the one hand, having 7., . '7 rtant, based on Your Honor's ruling 13 Crime Victims' Rights Act claim being 5 that you are going to allow the parties to 12 Mr. Epstein has to preserve his Fifth '6 go into this case and not tangential Issues 24 Amendment right to self-incrimination, and - 7 involving other individuals. 27 the fact that Mr. acted in taking + +t you've made, that those are the facts 24 brought -- which, arguably, out of necessity + +:8 So that is our -- that Is the area -- 28 the offensive in bringing the tort claim of 20 stay concerning. 20 an exemplar -- against Mr. Epstein, the 21 So where are we procedurally? Well, 21 strategies would then coalesce, co-exist and 72 this attempt to set aside the 22 would create concern of a significant nature + +:9 and that is the case that we are seeking the 29 some nature, generically -- again, just as + +23 non-prosecution agreement was brought by 21 for the Court. 25 that. It was brought by 25 address that? + +74 I'll'''. We can't lose sight of 24 But this is quite different. Mow do we + +MR. GO:IMAGER: Okay. MISlosetf011Yd I HPA. 3 It's the playing field that we are on right case for an indeterminate period of ties. + +2 Judge, strategy has nothing to do with this. I am not asking this Court to stay this 4 There's three things that can happen, Your io having to testify, without having to worry other remedies in his CVRA case. lie could 9 about rirth Amendment privileges, whether do that. Judge Marra could enter his order '0 he's implicating himself in any kind of 10 on the account to set aside the !IPA, or this • criminal liability. He could have gone 11 Court can temporarily stay the matter until + +5 Now, Mr. Epstein filed his lawsuit Honor. Mr. can volunteer to not 6 against Mr. and he very well could seek the remedy of setting aside the 9 have gone forward In that lawsuit without non-prosecution agreement. He's seeking '2 forward on that case against Mr. 12 such time one of those thing •open. + +3 without having to get on the stand and 13 There's been no tea n the record :4 testify. 34 frost anybody as to ho that tay is + +'5 Now, in defense of that case, if that 15 going to require. :6 case had gone forward and the defense had 26 I think a rf you asked 5 decision to make as CO whether he was going is like that .- how 0110 IS that CVAA Case + +.7 called Mr. Cpstein, then he would have had a is Mr, e stand or anything • 1 t0 answer the question. It gOing t0 n r. Mr. said, Well. 20 21 f go an ray a long time. Well, a only record you have right now + +20 THE ODOR,: Well, I Couldn't imagine, In reviewing Mr. Epstein's complaint now for :2 the -- beyond 10 times -- that he could have 22 the a thing is not coming to fruition. 23 avoided taking the witness stand to justify :4 r5 most, if not all of his claims, in that initial suit. Out or) ahead. the + +2\11 THE COURT: Well, that, and newspaper 47 47 1:Ybel:nes.::" 04I the + +( S HCASSr • MR. COLOBRAGEA: If we put t ide, 1 federal court is not looking to try the 4 pending right now. You ca 1 nything 1 an order until the spring or summer of 2018. 5 you want. You can cal it coo t r- NA. GOLDBERGER: I don't have a 6 plaintiff, counter-defe - I practice recollection of that, Your Honor. Hut if 4 on the ocher el f the elevator -- but we that's been out there, I accept that -- Is are defending a u right now. We are 4 THE CGVRT: It didn't give we much ) the der nts in is case. il confidence that it was going to be + +7 and we turn to the playing fie t 7 case -- or there's going to be a significant 3 on right now, we have one 1 ui hiatus in terms of Judge Marra getting out + +o t defend that case. It is not 10 accomplished in a relatively brief period '3 • • ought an action to set aside 13 me -- not going to be accomplished before 5 And Mr. Epstein hos no choice, if I'm his 15 here. :6 lawyer, but to invoke his Fifth Amendment 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: My review of PACER, 1 + +ay field. We can't defend this 21 time. And certainly -- at least, again -7 use of what the plaintiff has Honed 12 anecdotally, without having it here in front Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. 24 March 13 of 2018, which is the trial day + +-7 privileges. 27 think, is they are at the point where 72 the playing field we have right now. 22 judgment, means to me someone is asking to 7) And we didn't bring this upon 23 end this thing. I think that's the juncture + +.0 What does that do? It's going to allow II there's a motion for partial summary - o Mr. Scarola to ask for all of these adverse 39 judgment that's outstanding. So that to 20 inferences and try to truck roll those 20 me -- again, not being necessarily a civil 7: adverse inferences to this jury. And that's 21 practitioner -- when I hear the word summary + +74 ourselves. They are doing it because they 24 that it's at right now. + +25 have brought this action to set aside the 25 So my point is, Your Honor, that we are + +not seeking an indeterminate stay. And the 1 2 Court has read the papers and you are aware TEE COURT: All right. Mr. Goldberger. 3 of the various factors that the Court is thank you. I will give you a couple minutes 4 considering in determining whether to grant to rebut if you choose to. rhetorically, what is the prejudice at this 7 point for a limited stay so that matter which this malicious prosecution claim 8 resolves? arises was filed on December 9 of 2009. So 9 Mr. , if he has been damagez. we are about to observe the ninth 'o has been damaged already. They want to try is anniversary of the pendency of this '1 this case in March. Everything that has 22 litigation. '2 happened, has happened. Nothing to going to 22 114K COURT: Excuses\* f my '2 change. 13 mathematical -- :4 \*6 reccepense that Mr. is claiming that '9 substantial amount of loss that he has it been br0u t0 e attention of the Court. io encountered as a result of the ongoing 20 we know that the same basis upon :2 eight years. 22 9, 2009, because the complaint '3 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, when you 2 it If rrrrrr in paragraph 42111 to the '4 weigh that -- Mr. admittedly has 4 ndenCy or the non-prosecution agreement. 5 testified in deposition that he's So it was there. And Mr. Epstein knew it ( 4 ,1114SY 116 • successful. He's doing very well 1 was there when he filed this ease. 2 himself, and I congratulate hi fo 2 And as Your Honor observed, he filed 3 But when you weigh that to p to this case within days of the implosion of 4 Mr. Epstein that he has e Rothstein, Rosenfeldt a Adler when 1 he's got them back on he ea ' defend presumably Mr. would have been most 6 this case at this point susceptible to a malicious prosecution 7 I think -- r Honor, we talked about assault. Re didn't need to file it then. a the 403 analysis o er matters, prejudice 8 Me had at least four years in which to file 9 versus CS's\* ue. I think we can kind a it. o of a ncing analysis in this 20 If he's claiming he's a victim Of a :5 at the extreme prejudice that Mr. Epstein is 's suffering, well, he just can't defend this 16 were concealed from him, then the statute- :> case. 17 of limitation wouldn't have even begun to :0 Courts are designed to be level playing 18 '9 IIIIII, and that's got nothing to do with 19 So there's no question about the fact 20 what the Court's doing. But just by virtue 20 that Mr. Epstein brought this upon himself. 7: of the way the facts have come out in this 21 He initiated these proceedings nine years 22 case and procedurally what has happened, it 22 ago knowing, as Mr. Goldberger says, he 73 is not a level playing field for Mr. Epstein 23 could not defend them. 24 because he has no choice but to invoke his 24 And indeed he couldn't defend them. + +is wafting for everything to flow from that. + +5 6 the stay. You have discussed one. t ask, + +Mr. Scarola. + +MR. SCAROLA: The complaint out of + +'2 THE COURT: What they will argue, though, is that there is financial '7 8 has built up over the years -- and Mr. Scarola was alluding to -- there's li + +34 15 MR. SCAROtA: No That quite all right, air. I didn't e that comment as 311 1, IS any criticism h, but just t, observe th been nine years during w ch a m on t0 stay could have litigation over the last seven, going on 23 argument rests today existed on + +. 11 RICO action, he would have had at least five 12 23 years in which t0 file it. If he claims that sosehow he was unaware of the 14 15 reasonable basis for the filing of a clef, against Mr. because relevant fact- + +'2 '3 Mr. wants to have his 441, in t sooner than later. And there may some prejudice there. But when you look + +>5 Fifth Amendment privileges, and Mr. Scarola 25 because in the face of a motion for similar/ + +judgment, which called upon him to disclose 2 the basis for his claims against 3 Mr. 'I'll'', he filed nothing. + +4 And on the eve of the motion for summary judgment, he voluntarily dismissed 6 his case. Re didn't say, I need a stay in 7 order to be able to produce evidence to support my claims. Re allowed the claims to 9 be reaolved against his now conclusively. + +So those arguments, quite frankly, don't wake sense. And I have gone through :2 in the written response that we filed and :3 pointed out all of the stages in the :4 litigation where Mr. Epstein reasonably '5 could have come before the Court and said, I :6 need a stay. + +What the defense acknowledges in their :a motion to stay Ss 44 and this is a quote. '9 •floricia courts have long recognised that 20 although under certain circumstances a trial • court Ray grant a stay in a civil proceeding :2 for a limited time during the pendency of a :3 COnCUrrent criminal proceeding, Such a stall :4 is not constitutionally required. + +aS "The earlier the motion is made, the + +more favorably it's looked upon. ( S \ shorter the stay can reasonabl 3 fa it's 4 anticipated to last, the mo looked upon.\* + +6 7 The burden of pro stay reasonably can be a is not on us. Motion. this iced to last on the party making the + +9 0 :2 :3 TR s is not a typical COnc egal -- strike that - final prosecution that we see le accident cases, for example, re may be corresponding vehicular slaughter case -- + +set aside or it cannot be set aside. + +If it is not set aside, then Mr. Goldberger tells us that there would I. no longer any basis for the assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege. + +well, respectfully, I suggest that there is nothing in the record that supports the assertion that Mr. Epstein will waive his Fifth Amendment privilege upon the 10 favorable conclusion of the Crime Victim:' 11 Rights Act case. + +12 THE COURT: As a second int, I 21 presume that, like any o SI case -- 34 this isn't construed lvil se, 35 correct, this Crime Rights Act 14 matter? + +37 18 sir, it is. Subject to appeal + +:6 YR. SCAROLA: Or a drunk driving charge -- + +:8 :9 THE COURT: Or DUI-type issue. YR. SCAROLa: Clearly. Clearly that's the circumstance, Your Honor. + +20 21 22 23 But let me talk about part of what Mr. Goldberger has said with regard to what we can reasonably anticipate with regard to length of this stay. + +21 25 There are two possibilities with regard to the non-prosecution agreement. It can be la 20 THE hat's exactly what I was say. Either side can appeal. So words, the state COuld appeal -- or -- the actual federal government d appeal or Mr. Edward's client could weal + +30 21 12 So, Mr. Epstein can have the advantage of a final disposition with regard to crimes only in the Southern District of Florida - as hie been repeatedly pointed out. That's all the non-prosecution agreement covers. + +23 24 15 2t 27 28 19 20 21 22 But he still has a Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer any questions about the crimes that he committed in the Southern District of Florida, because they are admissible in every other jurisdiction where he's been doing exactly the same thing to children for years. And no one could reasonably challenge that assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege. So that's one alternative. + +23 24 23 The other alternative is the Crime Victims' Rights Mt case results in setting aside the non-prosecution ag . And no + +MR. SCAPOLA: Yes. sir. True. + +In addition to that, even assuming a final and conclusive resolution of the Crime Victims' Rights Act case, which upholds the validity of the non-prosecution agreement, there is a federal statute which sakes admissible in any other criminal proceeding evidence of other child victim crimes. + +matter what Mr. Goldberger may say \*bop-2 what he believes the merits of that class ta be and the likelihood of that outcome to be, Judge Marra has clearly indicated that Jeffrey Epstein faces the possibility of 6 having that non-prosecution agreement sr 7 aside, in which case, he faces criminal 8 exposure, criminal liability for the 4O 9 cases that we know of, and any other cases that are developed subsequent to that time. And those prosecutions can go on for years :2 and their appeals can go on for years. + +:m So there simply is no basis, none, upon '4 which a prediction can be made as to a reasonable limitation associated with a stay :6 in this case. And these ere all things that Mr. Epstein had an opportunity to avoid, or :8 at leliet an opportunity to limit, by '1 delaying the filing of his maliciously filed Claim. + +He started this battle knowing the 22 Criminal exposure that he faced clearly at :3 the time -- not only in the Southern 24 District of Florida but knowing the Criminal exposure he feces elsewhere as + +well. THE COURT: I made a note 3 binder. And I think this 4 Suggesting, Mr. Scarola 5 wrong. + +6 What I wrote last en I was 7 reviewing these rials, was that 8 Mr. Epstein by a h gh hie attorney should v rec ed the potential expo re, .e., to a malicious prosecution, broYlht suit against Mr. that matter as well. and + +:6 n't want to include Rothstein in mix because that's a separate can of worms, which we don't have to get Into substantively at this point in time. + +:8 :9 20 71 .22 73 75 I don't think there's any way to not consider that. In other words, when the various claims were brought against Rothstein, and L.M. , there should have been -- and the Court would make this finding in its ruling, subject to Mr. Goldberger's rebuttal -- that Mr. Epstein by and through his counsel should have realized the potential + +ramifications of bringing this lawsuit. And those potential ramifications being that if he did not have the ability to sustain the claims that he made -- whether by way of summary judgment. Jury trial, appeal. whatever the case might have been -- then that recognition should have carried over to anticipate the very exposure which he now is facing, that being the malicious prosecution 10 claim brought by Mr. IIIIIII. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Your Boner, f have just 12 one last ratter that I want t4 address. and 13 that is the subject of p + +34 15 211 17 le le As. Your Honor, delay is never the f the burden of p experien does ham Sustain o altos, of the party with e already delay. And that n our ability to of proof, because 20 m fade and it isPaCte upon us to a 21 tonale degree than it does to the when we Carry the burden of proof. 22 + +But there's something more significant. 9 \ nd that is, for nine years these A allegations have repeatedly been receiving + +S ' + +20 11 12 13 14 15 It 17 So there is a very, very significant prejudice that haS already been suffered I , delay. There are other aspects -- less significant. But if this case wasn't filed until four years later, all of those appellate proceedings that were very costly to the plaintiff would have been avoided because the law would haven settled by that time. + +public attention without any final disposition exonerating Brad + +There is a poison that has been circulating within the stress: of knowledge that Brad has a right, an absolute right to put an end to. And the only way he Conclusively does that is with a judgment in his favor in thiS Case. + +18 So there are many reasons to deny this 29 notion. There are no reasons to grant it. 20 Thank you, sir. + +21 TNX COURT: Thank you, Mr. Scarola. 22 Mr. Goldberger. + +23 MR. GOLDBERGER: I don't want to 24 respond to each of Mr. Scarola's arguments. 25 1 want to just reiterate the playing field + +that we have here. The way things stand 2 right now, Your Honor, Mr. Epstein cannodefend this case. + +4 He can attempt to defend the case, but 5 he's going to have these adverse inference, 6 that are going to be pointing at him 1 i 44 7 arrows. It's not a fair fight. And chi: 8 only way to avoid the situation where i. 9 not a fair fight is for a limited stay. + +And when Mr. Scarola says we could have filed our motion for a stay early on, we :2 specifically did not file our motion for stay early on because that case -- that :4 being the CUM case -- was in it's infancy. + +'5 As I've explained to the court, we're :6 at partial summery judgment status now, so 7 it's reasonable to assure -- despite what the newspapers say and despite how fast this '9 case has moved 44 we ere much farther along 20 in the Case, and a reasonable stay can take it a fair playing field, is all that 72 Mr. Epstein Is asking. + +In my enthusiasm. 7 May have said 71 Mr. Epstein pled guilty to offenses 25 involving the three women. If I did SOY + +3 4 that, that was not a correct stat did not plead guilty to any of e women -- anything involvin os + +6 7 THE COURT: Thank Moo both sides f your written and oral p Ions. Obviously I hay yen this a great deal of thought. I have I d the materials that have be OV100 0 me, including a '0 tempi the Me law that was provided our + +:2 notion is denied. There was a :3 that was used in the motion filed by Epstein that has some analogous circumstances here. This talks in terms of :6 the invocation of the Fifth Amendment. 1 :7 will read it to you. But it gave me food :8 for thought as I was trying to decide -- on :9 the reviews from the papers -- the next step 20 in terms of how I was going to deal this and 21 the subject of oral argument. + +72 It says, quote, A necessity of the 73 validity of an assertion of Fifth Amendment 74 privilege, the court must look to all of the 25 circumstances of the case and be governed as 10 Truth by personal perceptions of the peculiarities of the case as by the facts actually in evidence, end quote. And that's a quote from the case called SEC versus Militano. M-I-L-1-7-A-M-O, which was an order from the Southern District of Hew York citing -- and actually quoting from a case called Moffman versus United States at 34! US 479 and 486, a United States Supreme Court decision from 1951. + +11 22 11 34 15 ti 27 ie le Why did that quote strike me as I vs: going through the actual iss that are before the Court on the est And that is, I think, e oy • quote, in that personal perce one of the peculiarities o e overn the Court's determlnati o - fdity of the \*\*\*\*\* tio th Amendment as by the facts act y evidence. + +20 21 22 Rink this motion parallels that, type la because of the absolute icy of this particular case and It' !Missypr oral protocol and esnifestatiOnS. + +AS H + +this point is helpful to the Court i Elmo 42 n ter-The timeline that's up on the + +2 of its analysis. And that is, that we have a situation where much of what was transpiring in the latter part of 2009 was the pendency of these three cases; L.M., R.W. and Jane Doe all represented by Mr. We had the added coeplieation of the implosion of the Rothstein firm due to the heinous activity that Mr. Rothstein ended up Pleading to. + +10 11 12 23 14 15 16 27 18 19 20 21 We had, as 7 mentioned last week and ai Mr. Scarola reiterated today, what must have been an extremely harrowing experience for anyone concerned, including Rothstein himself. though 7 hold no personal empathy for him. I will, of course, as an aside. adjudicate the case with full recognition of his rights and remedies, as I would any other litigant. Rut in terms of these particular facts and the peculiarity of this matter, it's something that needs to be addressed and discussed. + +22 23 24 25 And the timeline that follows, which is coapelling to the Court and its analysis, as it was earlier during recent hearings, that Mr. Rothstein's arrest and the time + +period -- which may not completely dovetail 2 with the federal agents raiding the 3 offices -- was a week before the subject 4 complaint filed by Mr. Epstein was initiated. + +6 And as I mentioned earlier, what 1 7 wrote in the margin of the binder was what I perceived to be a reasonable consideration 9 by counsel for Mr. Epstein and mr. Epstein himself as the plaintiff in that 2009 case that he brought during the time period just indicated around December of 2009 and '7 here we are in 2017. which is actually the :4 eighth anniversary. + +'5 So my math skills weren't off too :6 badly, because the case was brought in December of 2009. We are here now in :4 DeCember of 2017. + +'1 As I Indicated, Mr. Epstein brought :0 this case through Counsel. And there is • well-stated axiom, generally, not in the 72 legal field, but Certainly has application 73 here. that typically the host defense is 74 with Offense. + +zi And by taking the offensive and filing + +22 But a itical proceedings were set the civil context to suggest that applicable and appropriate time:" the very least, a stay could hiVP requested so that during these periods f times -- which I'm adopting but won't be reiterating for this record -- will be a + +actually, for the Court's purposes, constructively aware of what would have boon entailed for him to be able to, one, present and introduce the necessary legal and factual arguments to support his case; and two, be able to recognize the potential exposure that a malicious prosecution claim could bring at the inception of his filing of the '09 suit if he couldn't deliver on what 1 have globally suggested is an accountability issue. And this is standir: behind what has been filed. + +think amply Mr. S as pointed out that there were - rhos in the criminal courts talk -- critical stages of the p n things like Moray (oho c nfer ces have to be re-evelu ed and \*asked by the trial judge. + +3 4 the lawsuit -- which he had every to S) do -- as I mentioned earlier, e have been a recognition at y ant of the potential exposu defendants but pria4ily EdgI ds when he brought that suit. + +7 And that tial exposure should have been also tenets t that if he did not have sU bent a nition for whatever roes I'm not Suggesting -- there ma oea whore people just don't ight anymore -- those are rare, but occur. + +:6 :8 :9 20 71 72 73 But there should have been that recognition that that potential exposure existed at the time the suit was filed, that a malicious prosecution case could have been in the offend and may well have been in the offend, if the necessary elements from a legal perspective or the requisite facts were not able to be proven or at least shown at the time of mummery judgment, which ultimately occurred, which was not defended. + +75 So by taking the approach that Mr. Epstein through counsel took, he was 20 And it would have been when the motion was filed, which was approximately two StelthS prior to the Court, at that point. setting the case fOr the December 5 date - which was supposed to be today -- and not now when we are Several months removed fro: trial. + +it + +12 13 20 The issue of accountability is an important one and has always been an important one to this Court. And having to live with the consequences of one's choices -- whether they be independent or az a result of an attorney bringing the action -- which is that party's own chosen action, his own claim -- in this case it would be Mr. Epstein through counsel - to be emphasized. + +21 + +22 23 24 And again, the Court's analysis, though it will still be concerned about the timeliness -- timeliness does enter into the Court's view of this case -- the Court does + +25 + +part of the order if you so desire -- a stay could have been requested and it could have been potentially far more compelling at onof those periods. + +133 find it will be prejudicial to the interest I 135 your office prepare en order with some ] and that an individual on either side is citing to critical junctures, which you have 4 entitled to some finality. cited in your memorandum to support the + +2 of Mr. to further delay the matter. detail. p -- citations as well as + +5 The Court further finds that simply by Court's decision. 6 virtue of this NIP matter being resolved by MR. SCAROLA: And I gather it will tr. 2 the trial judge or by a jury is applicable insufficient to say that the motion is 0 in that Crime Victims' Rights Act case would denied for the reasons cited in the recor-I. 9 not be the end of it. In fact, it would be 7211I COURT: Yeah. One of our now 'o shocking to me that an appeal would not be lo federal court judges was criticized by the '1 taken -- no matter whether it was decided by 22 Fourth District Court of Appeal for doing '2 a judge or jury, or a combination thereof -- 12 just that, so we have to -- '2 that one side or the other would not appeal 23 MR. SCAROLA: We wi a detailed :4 the issue. So that would prolong it even 24 order, Your Honor. M take '5 further. IS transcript. + +:6 So the Court has taken into account all ii 7IIR COURT The 0 SO I guess it's + +.7 of the issues and all of the matters in 1/ back to the s balancing and trying t0 maintain the playing is MR. INK: turn. '1 field in as level a manner as the Court Can. It 7Ne T: MI for waiting again. + +20 However, there are going CO be, again, 20 i .. Sate that. Again, T apologias for Consequences for the actions taken. And by 21 • Ou off mid-thought. :2 taking the offensive, this takes us out of 22 the record. 'I the example that the Court presented 2 IA discussion was held off the record.) 22 Drought a claim against Mr. Epstein that had Mr. Link. + +:4 earlier, and that is, if Mr. had 4 Milit COURT: Back on the record, Please. + +?SI 136 • 2 a relationship to the claims brou Mr. on behalf of his c en 2 Mr. Epstein -- and I gave ex le f 7NR COURT: And don't be reluctant to 4 defamation -- something ha reintroduce me to where we were. 2 some type of tort Oat -- i e u d then see MR. LINK: I was going to start over. 6 issues that would inter h the Lev., Judge, and make you listen to me twice. 2 playing field t r. Goldberger and tl . MAR COURT: that's Okay. ) Other o a Ions. a Saying, Judge, was what I believe is + +1 2 MR. LINK: what we were talking about before the break -- + +8 Court has emphia. , th today and on 4 MR. LINK: Before the break, what I was o ut tie not the Case here. 20 important and might help us all understand In ose the playing field to which 11 where we are going and it Is this. I harp + +'2 found himself. I'm not here tO 22 looked at this case maybe too simply, You' • e, praise or otherwise comment on 13 Honor. - 5 that choice was made, and once there was no 12 with Jeffrey Rpstein's phone records? :6 application for stay at any of those 24 MR. LINK: It's in conjunction with -2 critical junctures outlined in the 27 Mr. Searola's confusion and Your Honor's - 2 denies the stay for the reasons that it 29 prove the truth or falsity of the :o stated in the record. 20 allegations of the complaint. + +C choice, other than to say that once 24 THR COURT: le this in conjunction now + +:a memorandum, then the court, as a result, la statement that he was going to be allowed to + +2: All right, again, thank you 21 What I said to the Court was that we 22 Mr. Goldberger. You are free to go if you 22 understand that you have said that. But we 23 wish. Good luck on all the matters that 23 don't believe that's what the law is. And 24 you're dealing with. 24 you asked me to explain why, so that's where + +22 Yr. Scarola, again. I would ask that 23 1 was headed. + +THE COURT: Sounds good. + +2 YR. LINK: Maybe I was looking at IL tn a too narrow of fashion, because of -- when I I read that Florida Supreme Court case that we spent the morning on, I read it to say 6 you look at when the complaint was filed 7 that day. And you look at all of this 8 information -- by the way, when I mean you, 9 I mean you, Your Honor, as a judicial determination -- unless there is a question of fact -- and this is what you have to ask :2 yourself. You have to ask yourself two 3 things. + +'4 One, is this information sufficient to '2 a reasonable person -- St's an objective :6 standard -- to a reasonable person that they would initiate the civil lawsuit? There's a '8 subjective component to it, though, which IS '2 this: that the person who is actually making the decision Cannot know that what they are looking at IS false. + +22 So there's en objective component, 23 which is, is this enough for a reasonable '4 person. Subjective component is the person 25 making the decision to initiate the civil + +5 6 2 :6 That was importer: questions that Mr. Gust there's bit of Plaintiff's -- C and us, asked because agreement between laintiff's counsel ieve Mr. Epstein ans t he didn't answer then all, are going to find a couple going to say, I think that was But he answered a lot of them, and ve 9 to 13 pages of testimony and two affidavits explaining essentially whet it was he looked at that gave him comfort to bring the suit. + +:8 :9 20 21 .22 23 25 What we have focused on since then - since our involvement in the case starting on the 29th -- is this -- this is what Mr. ' counsel sent us last time - put on the board last time. And this is where the disconnect is for me. And here it is. Lack of probable cause as to either or both two false claims -- not just civil + +h proceeding, do they have a good that what they're reading or looking at, connecting the false. + +Here is the first one. Brad fabricated the three claims against him. How, we looked at the complaint -- and I have heard you say that we are accountable for the allegations of the complaint. That allegation is not in the complaint. You looked at it with me and you saw the word that said the claims were weak. + +10 The words fabricated tie into 21 Rothstein, not . Put that aside for 12 23 14 13 ti 17 IS It a minute and let's assume, Y Honor, that this is the statement in plaint. To there a lack of prob use a 20-pau. complaint with 79 elle one if Mr. can denonstrete that a nation to be unt tion. Is that enough f probsb?e Cause? net if we - what it h rove that 75 of the 20 a one were not false? + +21 jury instructions and the Can law 22 egos let you parse through a complaint say. uh-huh. I found this sentence that don't think you can prove, or I found a statement that think is 'else. therefor: + +7 • I harken back -- and I hate to say It. You've made it clear: We are not trying defamation. But that is a defamation catr, because if I make 100 statements and 99 of them are accurate but one is false, guess what? You have a legitionte claim. for defamation. + +10 11 12 23 24 THE COURT: At the same again. I'm not going to suggest to you that there' always going to be a bright-line Separating detention claims versus claims of malicious prosecution. They could often be somewhat factually analogous. + +15 15 27 28 39 20 21 22 23 However, this all goes to the global decision, the global finding by the court. by the jury, whomever, of weighing that intonation that Mr. Epstein had at the time he filed suit, and arguably through the continuation of that claim. And just like anything else, when we instruct the jury. the jury can make a decision on all or par' of the evidence. + +24 23 They have the wherewithal through instruction to accept, reject or to do u- + +you don't have probable cause. + +they wish with respect to opinions of 2 experts. They judge the credibility and thus they Infer and draw reasonable 4 inferences from the evidence as to what the witnesses say. + +6 Same type of analysis here in the sense 2 that, if it's the Court's responsibility, 8 the jury's responsibility. They can find -- 9 the Court can find overriding facts that may be relevant to ultimately the Court's analysis while rejecting or accepting other :2 facts that ccae up with regard to the Court's analysis. + +:4 So in a vacuum, we are getting into a '5 little bit far afield of what I would like :6 to get back to, and that is, these 2 individual evidentiary issues but you know, I don't know where \*In you want to go on this. Right now it is not before the :0 Court. + +Y.R. LINK: It is in a sense, If I can, 22 Judge, which is this. This CiSO has to be :3 tried differently, and the evidence will be 24 different. + +25 If. for example -- and this is net + +talking about whose burden of pr Mr. Scarola said it's his bur he's going to try to prove 4 specific allegations in 5 untrue. That's what I 6 going to do. is. + +If he does 8 accomplish? 2 What th 0 shoal c, what does that at I mean by that. Its us is that the jury the decision about disputed at yre relied on by the person that '2 the Proceeding -- disputed facts. + +:3 ey are not supposed to look at the tents and determine if it's true or false. They are supposed to decide :6 if there's -- we say we relied on this fact, -2 they said we didn't rely on this fact. + +:8 or -- or if we say we relied on a fact, and '9 Mr. Scarola takes the position that you 20 didn't have a good faith basis to rely on 2: that fact because, then that would be a jury 22 decision about whether we relied on the 73 facts. + +74 You would then decide, once the jury 25 determined we either relied on it or not, 10 11 But how do we try this case? Mere is a sentence that you pointed out to me when said, Show me where -- it doesn't say fabricated. You said. Well it says weak. It says weak. + +12 13 34 15 to Well, how do we try bef the jury is that a contested fact wh cases were weak? Oo I have to c espe to give an opinion on the vale the cases at the time? And wee cosy. d what? + +35 le 20 WIN don know what you're asking w t0 d0 r g t now. All I'm Sayinu is ee all Ou suggest to you is they burden of proof when it comes to in the malicious prosecution core. LINK: Yes, sir. + +10 11 12 But, On the other side of the Coin. I indicated 16St week, that doesn't - again, in my respectful view of the law - end the analysis. Because it the same ti-... 13 as I pointed to the other day. Mr. 24 has the opportunity to dispel those obi:T.- 15 by Mr. Epstein. + +whether there was probable cause. And you will look at IS facts -- so if there are 14 that are still good and one goes away, you will make that decision. If five of them go away and there's ten left or four left, you will make the decision. + +THE COURT: VItimatelY, i agree with that largely it's going to be either the Court's or the jury's determination as to + +epatein.s subjective position at the tire he filed the suit and, according to the law, continued the prosecution of this case. + +Now, how you go about that, that's not for me to say. But I agree with you to th.. extent that there le a subjective element that relates to Epstein's decision-making to file a suit. + +14 Now. that's how the two sides resolve 22 the tension, and ultimately a determination 28 is made by the trier of fact. + +19 MR. LINK: If there's a disputed fact. 20 Again, that's sort of my struggle. And 21 maybe it's Mr. Scarola's struggle, which is 22 this. If this is the disputed fact, they 23 say there should have been an allegation 24 that the litigation team, which included 25 Mr. , knew or should have known the. + +1 the three-filed cases were weak. Let's just + 2 look at that statement. + +3 They have the burden of proof and they + 4 come forward -- and I guess Mr. [REDACTED] gets + 5 on the stand and he says, Jury, these cases + 6 were strong. They paid \$5.2 million -- + +7 MR. SCAROLA: \$5.5 million. + +8 MR. LINK: -- \$5.5 million to settle + 9 them. I am now going to come forward and + 10 put on an expert -- I am going to put + 11 someone on to say that's a small number for + 12 these cases. These cases are weak, because, + 13 look, L.M. worked at a strip club. She an + 14 admitted prostitute, call girl. All of + 15 these things come into factoring. + +16 What I'm asking, Judge, is if we are + 17 trying a probable cause/malicious + 18 prosecution case, then I would suggest to + 19 you that none of the specific allegations + 20 can lead to a conclusion of probable cause + 21 or not. + +22 The overall flavor of the case, the + 23 overall complaint, when fairly read, + 24 absolutely comes into consideration. It + 25 does. Was there a reasonable basis to go + +1 forward with this lawsuit? But + 2 cherrypicking a sentence or two in he + 3 complaint to prove it's falsify doesn't help + 4 you or the jury determine probable cause. + +5 THE COURT: Again, I don't know how we + 6 found ourselves here. I just want to get + 7 back to the evidence. Again, I can't be + 8 making advisory opinions, orders, whatever + 9 the case might be. + +10 I want to get back to the individual + 11 evidence provisions. + +12 MR. LINK: Your Honor, I thank you for + 13 allowing me to finish. I appreciate it. + +14 THE COURT: We are back on the phone + 15 records. + +16 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, yes. I + 17 think we are on number ten, my client's + 18 phone records. I believe Your Honor has -- + +19 THE COURT: Yes. You gave those to me. + +20 MS. ROCKENBACH: I did indicate that + 21 they have nothing to do with what my client + 22 knew, what information he relied upon when + 23 he instituted the original proceeding. + +24 THE COURT: Mr. Scarola, your position + 25 on the phone records, please. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: The same as my position + 2 with regard to these other exhibits. I + 3 don't know what Mr. Epstein is going to + 4 attempt to demonstrate with regard to these + 5 underlying claims. + +6 If he is attempting to prove that they + 7 were fabricated, if he is defending against + 8 the assertion that these were well-founded, + 9 valuable claims, then the phone records may + 10 very well become relevant and material, + 11 because they include the names and telephone + 12 numbers of vast numbers of juveniles who + 13 were being sexually abused on a daily basis + 14 multiple times a day. + +15 They include the names and telephone + 16 numbers of other witnesses to that abuse, + 17 which form the basis for Mr. [REDACTED] seeking + 18 to take their depositions, because + 19 Mr. Epstein -- in the underlying cases, as + 20 he has in this case, asserted the Fifth + 21 Amendment privilege -- was not responding to + 22 questions. And so we needed to rely upon + 23 the testimony of third parties in order to + 24 establish the claims. The telephone records + 25 were part of the basis for identifying the + +1 third parties who we sought to take + 2 discovery from. + +3 So again, I really think that -- I + 4 haven't offered these. I don't know if I'm + 5 going to offer them. I won't talk about + 6 them unless and until I believe that a + 7 reasonable basis exists for me to do that, + 8 and then I will address that outside the + 9 presence of the jury. + +10 I don't know what else I can say with + 11 regard to this and all these other matters. + 12 We are going through this, and I'm going to + 13 say the same thing over again. + +14 So, for purposes of brevity, I will + 15 tell Your Honor that for future reference, I + 16 will simply say same argument. And now you + 17 know what it is I am adopting as the same + 18 argument. + +19 THE COURT: I rarely see you + 20 frustrated. I'm glad you're human like the + 21 rest of us. + +22 MR. SCAROLA: I clearly am, Your Honor. + 23 And I'm sorry there's frustration coming + 24 through in my voice, but there is + 25 frustration in my heart and in my mind. + +THE COURT: Not a problem. + +2 It is the same ruling. Again, if the 3 issue is one of reasonable discovery and 4 why -- and if Mr. Epstein is going to cl. that somehow Mr. S was oft on a 6 goose chase, then clearly the fact that he 7 was seeking to discover these phone records 8 and the purpose for the discovery would be 9 appropriate. + +However, at this juncture, as an exhibit that is the guts of the phone :2 records, as a matter of relevancy, as a :1 matter of privacy -- and I don't see :4 anything in here with names -- they are just '5 numbers. + +:6 MS. ROCKENBACH: Correct. That's correct. + +THE COO,: SO I'm going Cornelia the '9 same ruling es I did on number nine. + +70 XS. ROCKHNRACK: Thank you, Your Honor. The same argument for phone :2 records, which 1 can bring to the bench. They do not have names. They have numbers. + +14 THE COURT: Mr. Scarola has indicated 25 that would be the same Objection. It would + +3 be the same ruling. (cc Jail visitation logs. S a lieri c same ruling. + +4 Jeffrey Hpstei n's tt f . Let's speak about that + +6 MS. ROCKMNBACK: Y or, this would + +also implicate probation file would trigger part of a dente code that + +Mr. SC& refer earlier, which was + +'0 90.4 12 His probation file is akin to + +logs or any aspect of the + +:2 Irma action, which we are not trying in :3 se. Similar fact evidence of other + +s, wrongs or acts are inadmissible when + +the evidence is solely to prove bad :6 character and propensity. And that's + +90.404(2). + +Mr. Scarola keeps referring to the :8 + +second subsection of that evidence code, :9 + +20 which is subsection B. And it says in a criminal case in which a defendant is 71 + +72 charged with a crime involving child + +molestation, then this evidence becomes + +24 relevant. 25 Your Honor did actually already make a 1 ruling -- or at least discussed that code section in relation to the federal code. which isn't applicable. + +10 parading them around the jury to tell the + +11 jury about what probable cause may have + +12 13 existed in these affidavits, absolutely prejudice my would nd be would + +34 not receive a fair t tion. + +15 TeX COURT: Is anything specific, + +ti 17 Mr. Scarola, t nk of that + +Is would be Court ne file that the bout now? + +It MA. Nothing Your Honor needs + +20 about w. Same argument. + +21 22 COOKY: Okay. Same argument. Same Again, this would be akin -- to + +2 an analogy -- to in a personal injury + +2 How, if there were certain things in the employment file that would relevant, for + +10 11 ruling. I am sustaining the objection. MS. ROCERHEACH: Thank you. Your Honor. + +12 Same argument for number IS, the + +23 victims' statements to the FBI. + +14 THR COURT: He are actually on 14. + +15 16 XS. ROCKEHBACHt All probable cause affidavits. Yes. I indicated that that + +37 would be the save argument, because it + +18 relates to criminal investigation. + +19 THE COURT: Same argument? + +20 21 MA. SCABOLA: I would only point out. Your goner, that clearly to the extent eh:, + +22 had that sworn testimony + +23 when he initiated both his civil lawsuit -- + +24 23 his civil lawsuits, and when he relied upon that in pursuing discovery, it's obviously + +This is not a molestation case. The probable cause affidavits that related to the criminal investigation are absolutely irrelevant to this malicious prosecution case. And if there was any remote relevant + +probative value to introducing them and + +Otten listing the plaintiff's employment + +file. And that would carry with it the Same + +general objection. + +example, there may be something fn an + +employment file that shows a prenexistinq + +injury of some sort, then that would be - that may mall be relevant. + +But simply Stating probation file + +without any specifics would be the same + +2 3 relevant and material, depending upon what Mr. Epstein attempts to say, so it is tb' same argument. + +4 THE COURT: I am going to defer on i number 14. t think that that is more those Comment, in particular -- on the 6 specific. I think it is potentially proprietary or reasonableness of 7 critical to the analysis as It relate: 2, conduct, and whether Jeffrey + +1 Mr. Scerola. KR. SCAROLAk Yes. Your Honor, I just want to supplement my argument in this respect. He have been focusing on -- in 1 the strength of the cases that are involved. Epstein woo in a position to consider what !Cl regarding his position. Rut I also 10 conclusion that Mr. was a knowing understand Mr. Scarola's argument regarding II participate in a Pon:i scheme and :4 not going to be Mr. Epstein's objective III articulate what the ble se standard .5 position that needs to be heard. IS is. And I think the ybe I am in :6 All right. Next is number 15. 14 agreement wit oppo ounsel, but I want '1 "Victims' statements to the RBI related t0 11 to be mu- I he stated it in what I + +9 I understand Mr. Link's argument ) was happening as contributing to a .2 the fact that somehow they have to prove 17 fabricating claim: against m. .3 their probable cause case. And it's just I) I think it's impo hat we + +.s the criminal Investigation of Jeffrey is consider to be n appropriate fashion. + +'9 kinstein... it The ue a, would an objectively 20 MS. ROCRRRHACII: Your Honor, I have a 20 le and caution person -- that's the COPY Of these if the Court would like to 2t part of the formula -- knowing :2 review them. They were produced by 22 wha ffrey Epstein knew -- that's the + +:3 Mr. Scarols. They are approximately six 7 a jective portion of formula -- have :4 pages. But they are absolutely irrelevant, 4 robable cause to believe that 75 inflammatory. Prejudicial for 2, Y Client in fabricated the claims against + +• this action. Victims' statements they 1 Jeffrey Epstein and was a knowing 2 relate to the criminal case. 2 participant in a massive POriii scheme. + +3 THE CO0RT: Off the d. So there is both en objective and a 4 12, discussion was of h °cord.) subjective cosponent. s MS. ROCKENHACH: ur Hon r i quickly And when we talk about things like 6 looked at the names on articular phone records and address book and a to E.Y., L.M., J who were b EPStein knew about the existence of those 3 reprove by Mr. aria. TOT that reason il PhOn• records. Hs know about the 'Giros) :3 t • + +1 victims' state\* and they d0 not relate appointment books and airplane logS, Jeffrey '0 they er t relevant. 20 books. He knew about the appointment book) now is Court has already sold you 21 and the airplane logs showing that children :2 going to allow or constructively as were being transported on those jet planes. of the sexual abuse/assault claims. 23 lie knew what was happening to those children that is what this will be pointing to. II on those jet planes. Re knew some 40 + +5 THE COURT: Okay. I have read them. 25 children had reported virtually identical :6 It IS the same argument, same ruling. that 26 crimes to law enforcement. :2 is, that if it comes to a point where there 22 SO those are all things that he know. :9 Mr. acted in manner that was rash, 29 to bring other children, too. He knew he 20 that was in a wanner that was without 20 paid the three victims that are named in 2: forethought, that he did not properly 21 1111111\* complaints not only \$200 74 brought on behalf of the three young women, 24 to his. And he specified what it was he 25 then again we will revisit. 25 wanted and what would gather a premium an., + +:s is a contention by Mr. Epstein that is He knew that he was paying children a bounty 12 discover those issues that are -- that would 22 per sexual massage, but also paid them 2 or 13 form the basis of the claims that were 23 \$300 for each other child that they brought + +2 2 4 what wouldn't gather a premium.. So when we talk about things like. ill he know these were strong claims independent of the parade of horrible, that he lists + +from seven down now to where we are -- and that's number IS -- is that while it is absolutely conceivable that this intonation -- some of this information may s there about these young girls -- be relevant, what I'm trying to deal with 6 incidentally, the vast majority of which here and distinguish is a discussion about 7 things, if not all of them, occurred aft, what Mr. Epstein may or may not have Snow, S he abused these children. and the actual introduction of the record-, + +9 As the sworn deposition of G.M. which I don't believe have any real .0 indicates, she was -- and I think I have 20 probative value themselves. That's a already referenced this in prior argument to 21 distinction. + +.7 the Court. She was a middle school student 22 I don't want a jury get g bound up in '3 doing well. She was doing well 21 trying to locate six pho rs that say :a academically. She was participating in 14 be similar, or six ti ind dual phone .5 extracurricular activities. IS entry is listed, and a atically assume + +.6 While she has a difficult home life, it le that it may hew in o do in .7 had not impacted upon her personal conduct 27 particular h hese three young 5 in any way that brought her in contact the is ladies t t Mr arcs represented. 20 resulted in her engaging in the kind of 20 0 isitation logs. All of those :2 that she hike alleged to have been involved 22 wit a competing claims of knowledge, :2 In, which ell occurred after Jeffrey Epstein 2 t ngth or weaknesses of the cases -- all + +'9 criminal law or in any way whatsoever that It The t g with the probation file conduct, like stripping, or anything else 21 Ilile they may have something to dO :4 had abused her. 4 f which, again, despite my diSag replant, at 7s So these are things that Epstein knew, least in some regard with Mr. Link -- and + +• I appreciate the Court's concern I those things being relevant to discuss as 2 this focused on the claims of W., 7 far as what Mr. had to sustain hi: 9 Jane Doe. But that is foeu f ms claims. the actual documents themselves, 4 on L.M., G.M. and Jane T s hat unless there's an issue as to they don't s Epstein knew about the trengt f their exist, or there never were any phone + +6 claims. records, or there never was a flight log. + +7 ThiS is no Ingle, isolated that's a different story. 9 victim. Se ar t three isolated s what Your Honor said. I am in absolute o victi were abused on a single 10 agreement. I am not even going to offer • a . \*I was part of an extraordinary 11 them unless they fit that pattern. + +n incident. This a single, isolate) 4 MA. SCAROLA: I take Lieu° with none of + +-2 ttern •f abuse. 12 They have been listed here because we l d that's why I as suggesting too, 23 are obliged to list them. all exhibits that r Honor, that I simply need to adopt the 14 way reasonably become relevant and material. + +:5 same argument. I'm not going to offer any 15 THE COURT: Fair enough. And I think :6 of this evidence unless and until I satisfy 16 that's the value of the discussion that we - 7 the Court that it's relevant and material. 27 are having here today, that we can narrow + +:8 And that's all I can say. 28 some of issues -- narrow the intent of what + +:9 THE COURT: In this particular victim 29 these documents are sought for reasons -- 20 statement dated 5/30/2000, it's from a Shana 20 for the reasons why they're sought to be 7: L.R., who I don't believe has anything to do 21 potentially introduced. 72 with this particular case -- these three 22 Again, I don't think it's -- I think + +7) cases, that I'm aware of. 23 it's a good exercise. So let's go ahead and + +.74 And the point I'm trying to make as it 24 proceed further. + +25 relates to these exhibits that are listed 25 MS. ROCKKHHACR: Your Honor, number 16 + +is the video of the search warrant of -5 2 client's home -- while being executed, tho Jeffrey Epstein's assets.' + +accounts and any/all records related CO 3 search. I don't have the video, but I MS. ROCKEIMACH: That was not produced, 4 presume by that -- it wasn't produced, but I along with this passport. Nineteen and 20 5 presume by that description, it is the some have not been produced. But I presume that 6 ruling. this somehow relates to the punitive + +7 THE COURT: The same ruling as in ' damages. S the application for the search warrant - MR. SCAROLA: It does. 9 sustained. MS. ROCKKHBACH: And there was a + +'0 MR. SCAROLA: Let me just point out to 10 stipulation by my client in discovery -- I '1 Your Honor that the reason why that's listed 31 think it was discovery answers -- about net :2 :3 is because the victims, including these three, give detailed descriptions of where :4 they were in the house and what the interior 14 Mr. Scare'. -- and u ndab so -- 1, '5 looked like. And all of that is 13 not going to accept th stipulation. + +32 worth that was in excess + +21 TIE COURT: Me talk that. + +:6 corroborated by the search warrant video. 16 So eventu ly, re a going to have + +-7 THE COOKY: Again, It's with the 17 to be furt d ssi . I presume that'- :5 proviso and caveat that I will remexamlna 38 part Of t sett to Compel on Thursday. '9 each of these exhibits, If need be, when the 19 MS. Ru : Yes. your Honor. :0 Context is pointed out. But for now, the 20 SCAROLA: ft arises in the context + +same ruling is being issued. 21 . fth Amendment assertion to requests limos inferences from those requests. + +:2 MN. ROCKEWHACH: Number IO -- actually, 22 for scion and our being able to draw 21 17. It's identified on the exhibit list by :4 Mr. as the application for a search It has to do with response' to :5 warrant of my client's home. And it's questions during the course of deposition. + +2\4 + +• possible that by mistake Mr. Scar 1 And, yes, there's a motion to compel, 2 office produced a different do 3 because what was produced i hi assertion with regard to some aspects of 5 l was an order sealing of it 0 application for search arrant a d related 6 search warrant and inve n return. And by the Fifth Amendment. That would be a 7 attached CO the re the subpoenas CO the waiver with regard to anything that was 8 Custodian of rec bellSOuth, T-MOblie 2 disclosed to third parties. 9 and Gin r. So looks like phone ii Max return\*, saes thing. Waiver. '0 roc\* • 10 THE COURT: Deeds. + +2 because we believe that the Fifth Amendment what have been requested -- for example, disclosures to banks -- would not be Covered + +LA: Sounds like the wrong if MR. SCAROLA: Deeds, airplane + +:2 hibit 12 registrations. + +:1 .. ROCKEHBACE: Sounds like the wrong 13 THE COURT: That's fine. Me will 041H, :5 same basis that the application for the 12 appropriate time. :6 search warrant of Mr. Epstein's home would 26 Twenty is Mr. Epstein's passport. :7 not be relevant, would be prejudicial -- 27 Again, I think that has to do somewhat with + +'bit. but we would object to -- on the 24 them up. If it's necessary, at the + +:a THE COURT: I have already indicated 28 the Issues we discussed as to the flight + +:9 the sass as to number 17. 29 logs. + +20 MS. ROCKMENCH: Eighteen, Your Honor, 20 Driver's license. I don't know what + +7: is the complaint. 22 that might be relevant to. + +22 THE COURT: That, again, is typically a 22 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. 73 matter of judicial notice, so we will deal 23 THE COURT: Same ruling. I will 74 with it, if we need to, at a later time. 24 sustain the objection at this time. >5 'All records of homes, properties, bank 23 List of corporations owned by + +Mr. Epstein. t presume that has to do with 1 are deterring, Your Honor, until you hear testimony. And it sounds like the door would be that my client didn't know the sq, of the three clients of Kr. THE COVET: At this point, yes. + +number 19 and the punitive damage claim. THE COURT: Me will deal with that at a + +XS. POCK/MACH: Twenty-three through 26 have not been produced. And I presume -- '2 honestly, they are vague. And I can't see 12 during the criminal investig en. "/ what relevance these vague yearbooks are 13 We are not in the c + +MS. ROCKKHBACH: Thank you, Your Honor. Humber 28 is similar to what you ruled upon the last hearing, which was number 7. messages taken from Mr. 1g/stein's home. '0 yearbooks would implicate -- I don't know 10 This is notepads found in Mr. Epstein's home '1 who they would implicate, actually. Quite 22 and/or doing trash pulls outside of his home + +6 going to have in the malicious prosecution 34 investigation. We ar tryin that case. \*6 THE COURT: Same argument. 14 client's home I irr- vs , prejudicial and + +M.R. SCAROLA: These reflect the I/ should not 1 oduc s appearance Of the victims' at the time that se THE RI: you have any of those' '9 Mr. Epstein was abusing them, Your Honor, to It Have you iv copies? :0 the extent there might be any argument that 20 ROCKEIDIACH: T did. yes, 28, 1 :2 defense as a setter of law, but it might be 22 ler. hibit, SO -- and you will see '3 argued in litigation if hewers to try to 2 th -- : 4 Contend -- he ray try to contend that his 4 May i approach, Your Honor? + +he was unaware. And that Obviously IS not a 21 mpling. I think it was a very + +THE COVET: Sure. Okay, again, I have + +168 + +• therefore less culpable. And we show 1 reviewed these materials. I am going to 2 pictures of these victims from h 2 wake the same finding I made earlier, the 3 4 s 6 7 jury could draw their owr, lu to whether this wee inadve It is not a defen as a er of law. They were either of age of age. And he was either a fically requesting 2 child 0 y rate, they COUld il be discussed. '0 Clea a relevance in that regard. And 20 The actual documentation themselves, '2 - + +impact upon the issues as to preparedness, knowledge -- as far as Kr. is concerned -- his diligence as to discovery. if those are called into question, then these may be discussed. The fact that he 8 children or not I tally requesting a had these materials probably will be able to m offering them at this point. 11 though. /main. I think would be excessive are there In the event this becomes 12 and would be getting into other matters that . 33 would not be germane to the three young THE COURT: I feel comfortable 24 women who were involved here. deferring on 23 through 26. Twenty-seven is 15 So in essence, it's sustained in parr. + +'6 the same. 16 overruled in part. '2 XS. ROCKLNSACK: A4 earlier -- es 14, 17 Ms. ROCKKIMACH: Haber 29 is the Palm 'S and 15. le Beach State Attorney's Criminal file. It'- ', THE COURT: The same as actually -- 19 over 2,000 pages. I have a sampling for 72 MS. ROCKENBACH: Same ruling for 27, 22 is, if it gets to the issue like we 73 which is sustained? 23 discussed -- I'm going to repeat myself -- 71 THE COURT: Yes. 24 then the fact that's it's a 2,000-c: 25 MS. kOCKENIMACH: And 23 through 26, you 23 criminal investigation file that Yr. + +20 PS. MICKEHBACH: Seventeen. 20 Your Honor to look at if you're interested. 71 THE COURT: So the same ruling. 21 THE COURT: No. Same ruling. And that + +:6 ago the compilation of the file 2 had knowledge and the of the file -- even if he didn't have s to it, which would be likely -- then that would be relevant, as I said. to Mr. + +:7 :8 :9 70 01 02 73 Also, I agree with Mr. Scarola that certainly the sheer amount of the file would have been known to Mr. Epstein, at least should have been known by Mr. Epstein. Md that say be something you may or may not ask him. But that should have been known to him at time he filed the lawsuit. + +had SOme access to formulate his position as 2 to the legitimacy of these three claims, if those are called into question -- because 4 there are that busy equivocation regarding the legitimacy of those claims -- then 6 again, it may come into play. + +7 The fact that there was a criminal file 8 prepared -- no surprise to anyone -- won': be a aurprise to the Jury. But the individual pages therein would have to be '1 further discussed at a later time. + +:2 Mr. Scarola. + +:2 MA. SCAROLA: Your Honor, this is one :4 of the circumstances where the distinction '5 that I referenced before probably becomes very clear. That is, during the course of e criminal prosecution, these criminal files probably would not have been available to Be may have had the same :0 Information from other sources. RUt they obviously were entirely available to Jeffrey Epstein. 72 + +So these would have a significant 74 impact on what Mr. Epstein knew in order to make a determination OS co whet a r44e0nably + +4 objective person could or could upon in forming probable cause THE COURT: Again, I'm d + +6 3 :0 with the sanitizing - attempting to sanitize ability, and to carve o between the thr the globalmy~ investg%ht think it here. 0 t of our distinguish alma that are brought is that was done. Md rtinent to the analysis + +20 Rut again, the global ruling is the individual entries, unless there's something that is brought to my attention, would not be subject to admission. Rut the likelihood that the significance, if you will, of the file, the volume of a file would be particularly important as to Mr. Epstein': knowledge prior to filing the suit. + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor. I'm sure + +It 23 24 23 24 Ms. misrepresent any fact to could we know the bas that Mr. Epstein did the crisinal C Rockenbach wouldn't into natty rt, but aiming eve discovery in + +27 28 It 20 27 22 MS. Client w wrong, bu don't think that my access -8 I could be ot imagine my client would ess to the Palm Reach County State a criminal file. I'm not sure how t would get his hands on the State rney's file. + +74 MS. WICKEIMACE: It was not, Your 25 Honor. I have been informed it was not. + +THE COVET: Agein, we will have to figure that out as we go along. + +MR. SCAROLA: Well. I'm sure it's a reflection of Ms. Rockenbach not doing + +10 11 12 So if it's simply a matter of XS. Rockenbach not being familiar with that procedure, I understand that. Out I want the \*\*Cord reflect there's no basis in the record to Suggest that Jeffrey Epstein old not have all of the discovery to which he was entitled in the criminal case. + +criminal practice. But those of us who have engaged in crisinal practice know that all evidence in the hands of the State Attorney is require to be turned over to the defense in the context of a criminal prosecution. + +13 THE COURT: I think it's more a matt., 24 of timing that I am concerned with. And 15 that is. at the time he filed the suit 14 versus whenever that information may have 27 been turned over could be very distinct. + +28 MR. SCAROLA: He was well into the 19 defense of his criminal prosecution at the 20 time. + +21 THE COURT: By December of 2009? + +22 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. + +23 MS. ROCKKHOACM: I do believe, Your 24 Honor, though, that we are getting very f:- 23 astray from probable cause -- which I + +appreciate Mr. Scarola's assistance with the 2 knowledge of the criminal -- because I have 2 not practiced -- I did do some appellate 4 criminal work when I clerked at the Fourth District Court of Appeals, but that was a 6 lifetime ago. + +7 Hut the probable cause issue is not whether or not my client knew about the 9 State Attorney's file or the 2,000 documents. It is whether my client had probable cause to institute the original proceeding based on a reasonable belief that Mr. participated or had connection '4 to Mr. Rothatein's Penal scam. And that's the defamation by way of the Jury :6 instruction for probable cause, which is 406.4. + +.3 So I'm not going anywhere outside of the Florida Supreme Court jury instruction :0 definition and the case law. + +But all of theSe exhibits that we 22 are -- and the Court is incredibly patient :3 with us going through -- relate to the 74 criminal action and the criminal -- we are 25 now on the Palm Beach County State + +4 Attorney's criminal file. So I g whether my client had it or no is irrelevant. It is an issue v trying in this case, an ar o rying he criminal action. + +6 0 788 COURT: 1 unde But it gets back to his kn0 his constructive ramifica4ns or his accountability, (Woof the ential ramifications that toultiarise when he filed this lawsuit lace. And those are all \*2 as far as this Court is concerned, :3 am shown something otherwise by way the case law. + +:5 So let's move on. 1 would rather go :6 forward -- just to give you my thoughts on -7 the subject. + +:8 Again, t am always inviting anyone to :9 bring cases to my attention that may serve 20 to change my mind, or at least influence the 7: decisions that I am going to make. + +.72 MS. ROCKEMBACE: Than you, Your Honor. 23 It seemed Your Honor was sustaining, but 1 24 want to make sure 1 understand. + +25 THE COVRT: 1 have already explained + +10 11 12 11 This is not irrelevant under 401, it' prejudicial under 403. and it also implicates the conviction of rtain crime, of impeachment under 90. + +24 15 24 29 It We discussed thi Youi honor at prior hearing on Nov 29th about a procedure to d0 a witness on the eta -ver been convicted of a eel involving dishonesty. If they s o.jhen you can absolutely use 20 a to impeach their lying under oath. 21 COURT: Remember we had that 22 die On between credibility and a factual 2 is e. that being relevancy, whether or not \ 4 omething tends to prove or disprove a material fact. That's how we distinguished + +it. tt is in the record. + +MS. ROCKHIlBACH, Hest are the document: related to Mr. Epstein's conviction. They weren't produced. I don't know what precise documents they were, but I really don't think it matters, because it relates to thr criminal conviction and his plea colloquy that was heard before -- I believe it was Judge Debbie Pucillo on June 30, 2008. + +10 Mr. Scarola. MR. SCAROLA: I only wanted to point out to Your Honor that a comment was made by Mr. Goldberger earlier today that's relevant to this discussion, and that is, he said that Jeffrey Epstein did not plead guilty to crimes involving these three victim.. 1 don't believe that that is supported by t7 . record. + +11 12 13 24 15 is I think what the record reflects -- and Your Honor has a Copy Of the Conviction, so you might be able to correct me if I'm wrong, because it's been a while since I saw them. But I don't think that there is a victim named, strangely, in those pleas. + +22 18 19 20 23 22 In fact, when Mr. Epstein vas asked who did he plead guilty to prostituting or soliciting for prostitution, his response was, I don't remember. I don't know who it was that I pled guilty to soliciting for prostitution. + +23 24 23 THE COURT: For reasons that may have to do with the minority status of the victims, it states -- has Mr. Epstein's + +it the last time. + +name, guilty plea checked off by way of an 2 X. two case numbers. Charge: felony the minor victim. It's AD. It is not ono 3 solicitation of prostitution count one, of Mr. ' clients. 8 third degree felony; procuring Person under During Judge Pucillo's colloquy. AD is + +Second, in the colloquy, it identifies + +5 10 for prostitution, second degree felony. the minor that relates to that one count. + +6 It goes on by indicating the Rut there is nothing in the record there 7 presentence investigation. PSI was not that suggests child molestation or any pin 8 required or waived. The sentencing; credit to child molestation. 9 for time served; other comments or TAX COVRT: It depends how you look at '0 conditions, including the registration and le it. When someone is pleading guilty and is • designation as a sexual offender; 11 convicted of procuring a person under 18 for '2 presentation of DNA sample, as is required 32 prostitution, I am not carts that's not a '3 in these types of pleas. And no 23 form of child soleststio again, I a, :4 unsupervised context with minors, et cetera. 34 not here to parse wor + +'5 YR. SCAROLA: My recollection is -- 15 She bottom line S at if St was a \*6 THE COORS: To my knowledge, leafing ti civil action di ectl e1 ed to the '7 through this, there is no specific 17 criminal pr 8 designation of the victim by mime or le understa ing is hat the Plml ". a '9 Initials. It certified y the plea would be + +on again, my global 20 DO fled. 20 ed into evidence. + +MR. SCAROLA: That is my understanding 21 because of the uncertainty, l'- 93 SO when Mr. Epstein pleads guilty and and a knowledgeable one. for that matter. + +99 es well. And the criminal complaints that 22 01 o defer ruling on this particular 23 resulted in those guilty pleas had to do, 1 2 is e until really further information is :4 believe• with a long list of individuals. 4 veloped In order to rake a COgent decision + +S ISSY • is unable to identify who it is t pled 1 Same thing with the plea column. If it 9 guilty to molesting. I suggest r 9 doesn't have anything to do with any of the 3 that that is clearly a pr ve t at three individuals that Mr. 8 the jury can take into de i in 1 represented, the likelihood is I am going to s adjudging the strength f them ree cases, sustain the objection. 6 because he didn't say 1 one of these MR. SCAROLA: Vor whatever assistant.? 2 three individua Whim he said was, I it may be to the Court, I believe that AD is 8 don't remember w t as. And that clearly b the child who introduced N.W. to Jeffrey 3 Is a at At fr which the jury could il Epstein and was pa id for bringing her to '0 coact de, rticularly in light of all the 20 Jeffrey Epstein the first time. • t n t assertions from which 21 TRE COVET: Again, that may have '9 • ern •:Vacation can be drawn when he 12 everything to 00 with the case that was '1 to acknowledge he even knew any of 23 tried as to E.W.'s case. Again, those + +se three girls. 24 tangential issues were something that were + +:5 Those circumstances taken together 15 of extreme concern for the Court when it '6 clearly are relevant and material in making 26 comes to this malicious prosecution clef-. '7 a determination as to the viability of these 27 and the continue concern about undue '8 three claims. 28 information, and part of the reason why I am + +- 3 Y.R. LINK: Your Honor, if I may. 19 going to defer, but also keeping that very + +20 Mr. Scarola is dead wrong. He did not plead 20 much in the forefront of my consideration. 91 guilty to child molestation. You have just 21 that being undue inflammatory information 22 seen the plea. 22 being imparted to the trier of fact. + +23 I know you have asked us not to do 23 Number 32 is, "List of properties and 74 rhetoric. That is pure rhetoric. That is 24 vehicles in Larry Visoski's, V-I-S-0-S-Y-', 25 not the plea. 23 + +He's one of the pilots. 1 XR. LINK: Yes, sir. 3 THE COciti: Relevancy? 4 YR. SCAROLA: HAS to do with the transfer of assets out of Jeffrey Epstein's 6 name, Your Honor. + +7 And again, I don't know that that's going to become a matter that we need to 9 deal with. It's listed. My argument is what my argument was. + +THE COVET: Thank you. Again, that would be deferred until it needs to be -- + +3 YR. LINK: Your Honor, may I interrupt 4 for one second? Do you mind? + +:5 THE COURT: Pardon me? 6 XR. LINK: Do you mind if I interrupt for one second? + +8 3 know we are getting passed where you told us we could be, but I thought it might :0 be helpful if T Clarify heard you say that we have been equivocating -- I don't 22 think you mean OUr teem, but I think over the years eqUivOCating, and I would like to 34 put that to rest if I can. It right help us '5 going forward if you give me two minOt es. + +3 4 MR. LINK: If you don' in THE COURT: Not at + +6 XR. LINK: So the is no etivocation about this. And I want these words + +9 never speak in I aft like Mr. Sterols does, bu I would y to get to at least • 0 row; + +know we are wrapping up now anywa THE COUNT: Sure. + +as carefully as a, Your Honor. I can + +2 :3 a at I mean. The lawsuits were initiated in 2000 was a sole practitioner. r. + +:6 jail and is subject to the non-prosecution agreement. We have never taken -- we are + +:a :9 :0 not taking the position -- we are not taking the position for this trial that the filing of those three lawsuits were a fabrication. + +72 During that time frame, pursuant to the EPA, Mr. Epstein was not permitted to defend + +73 25 the merits -- he was allowed to challenge the amount of damages they were seeking. but he was not allowed under the non-prosecution + +During that time period when he filed them is when Xr. Epstein was serving time in 10 31 That doesn't mean that Mr. Epstein agreed with every single thing these folk: said, or that he thought the amount they were seeking was reasonable. + +32 13 15 34, But I want it to be cle that we are not intending to introdu nee that. from when he was a so r, that the three cases were toted or made up, or that the vas ricated or used as part of + +It All on takes ween April 9, '09, when t that we have focused 20 N Joins the Rothstein fir, and 29 eaves. + +agreement, essentially, to challenges liability. + +So there is nothing that we're saying that took place between the filing in 2008 and when he joins Mr. Rothstein's first that we are calling into question as being fabricated. + +22 0 One of the things this court has 2ASSV as that I think is really important -- and 4 understand your ruling -- you and I have a little disagreement about the way we think + +.4I 1 + +10 doesn't get to come in and say words that aren't in the complaint, that they have t: point to words where it say, there was a fabrication and whO made that fabrication. + +11 12 13 14 the word that you pointed to was the word weak. And were going to have a trial over whether the cases were weak or not weak to somebody's subjective level. + +15 16 17 But I want to be sure that it's really clear, because all the things we've been talking about -- the criminal activity, the + +18 19 arrest records, the flight logs -- all of that relates to, in my view, none of the + +20 21 activity that is from April 9th, '09 backwards -- April 9, '09 backwards -- I may + +22 23 have misspoken. I will clarify that in a second. + +24 25 And what t mean by that is this. The cases that were filed by Mr. he h. + +it should go, but that happens to be almost every day in the courtroom. But you have made it really clear that we have to stanl behind the allegations of the complaint. + +And I'm taking Your Honor as saying that literally, that the plaintiff, too, + +probable cause to file them. We are not 2 saying that he didn't. We are not 3 challenging his bringing those cases, and we 4 are not going to complain about those cases. + +So information that led up to an arrest 6 for phone records wouldn't only come in if 7 we were saying those three cases in 2008 9 were fabricated. We're not saying that. 9 We're not saying that at all. + +What I'm hearing we are going to be doing in this trial is trying three :2 molestation cases. these three victims these three plaintiffs are going to get on the stand and we are going to try the \*\$ molestation case. Were they touched? Where were they touched? When were they touched? How many times were they touched? Whet did ,s they look like? What's their emotional :9 reaction to it? Have they suffered damages? 20 Have they become strippers as a result of the touching? that's what we're talking 22 about trying in this malici0us prosecution action. + +/HE COURT: I am not sure we have been in the same courtroom. floc's fine if you 24 25 + +3 4 5 6 are under that impression. Again, I am not here to a questions or to give advt.° make advisory statement do here today is tryin much as this evidence a ying to rough as to determine whether or not. least On their Owe:). it would be admiSai would be deferred: 9 jab:leaf a and grated in part: is the , o Oble I Stained in part, denied in part, art: whatever the case might :2 :3 I would like to get back to that use the few more minutes to -- + +:6 :8 MR. LINK: Do you mind if I just see what I just misstated so I can fix it on the record if I need to? It will take me 10 seconds. + +:9 20 71 72 73 75 scAROLA: If Mr. Link is offering a stipulation that allegations in the complaints on behalf of K.M., L.M. and Jane Doe as filed by were well-founded allegations, I will accept that stipulation, and that may help to abbreviate some of the issues that we have been facing. 12 23 14 THE COURT: Mr. Link, are you willing to stipulate that the actions brought by Mr. on behalf of the three 10 individuals that we have listed by way of 21 either initials or Jane Dee that have been at center of this cont rovers were brought in good faith, and that gations mar, well-founded? + +25 311 17 19 It 20 Me. LINK: the distinction, and that's this. Y brought in good faith. Ca s the allegations are true? 1 an't s I t at, Your Honor, Me never put s the test because we + +21 22 dn't represent Mr. Epstein at that think -- when you ask me would I everything that was pled was true, I an't say that. + +9 MR. LINK: thank you, Your Honor. I hope my stipulation helped. + +10 21 tag COURT: All right, we are up to number 40? + +12 23 MS. RCCKENBACH: I think we were at 73. I wish we were at 40. + +24 THR COURT: We did 32. + +25 26 32 MS. ROCKENBACH: We did 32. THE COURT: I indicated that 35 is the next highlighted one. + +is 29 20 21 22 That again, is a matter judicial notice, and depending upon whatever evidentiary value it may have, those are just answers in affirmative defenses in the civil cases against him. + +23 24 MS. ROOM:MACH: Your Honor, I'm sorry. I think we also objected to 31. + +23 7:M COURT: I don't have it + +THE COURT: I think that's what Mr. Link has offered. + +MR. SCAROLA: I thought that that's what it was, but I want that -- that's an Important stipulation. there ought not to be any ambiguity. + +THE COURT: But you are saying Mere + +willing to stipulate that they were all made in good faith? + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir, absolutely. THE COURT: So stipulated. thank you. that Can be typed up and brought to the Court's attention, if nee rrrrr y, during the pendency of litigation. + +highlighted. 1 8 THE COURT: Responses to requests for in a large number of pending civil action: 5 production, requests for admission, answers and to escape liability for an even large-6 to interrogatories in this matter. And then number of potential criminal prosecution:. 7 there's a list of about 10 or so cases. while the limitation that Your Honor 9 case before you in division AG. And th:: issue for the reasons that Your Honor hat 'o case number, you can -- 10 stated, those reasons have no applicabil i tv '1 THE COURT: You're talking about AR? 31 when it comes to talking about motive and '2 MS. ECCKEHBACE: Yes. These are all 12 malice. ') '00 eases, '09 cases. I presume they are -- 21 When it comes to to ut motive :4 Your Honor, perhaps Mr. Scarola can 14 and malice, t respect sonde the jury :6 relevant to this action. 16 would take the is fi a malicious '7 Bringing in discovery from other 27 lawsuit, d he h e to gain by doing .8 lavallit8 seems t0 be creating mini- 18 that. 20 THE COURT: Well, depending upon the 20 a nom 1111111' prosecutorial :2 depending upon its relevance to the lawsuit 22 inf44lOile i decisions with '3 Chet we are dealing with here, things like :4 requests for adzisstons may be. pursuant to '5 the law, transferable to a similar case. at::::::::t:012::deev::::::f:::n:::::::1:0 + +He had the assistance of the University 2 tat. SCAROLA: I don't have it of Utah law professor Paul Cassell. So his 3 highlighted on mine either. motive was to escape or reduce his liability 8 Y.S. ROCKKHHACE: Those were not th\* has described applies to the probable car^ '5 tell us the relevance, but they would not be 25 needs to understand wh is that somebody .9 again within this suit. It And h d to gain was not simply nature of the discovery, end obviously 21 . with regard to three cases, but to 2\11 rd to a large number of other pending + +?C SHCASr' • Answers to interrogatories, the s ing. I spend the rest of his life in jail. 8 that are not stated un th. 1 does arise when we start talking about why 5 So what's your po tion, r Sterols? are we going to be talking about all of 6 YA. SCAROLA: Let state these other claims. 7 broadly, Your H that as hes been Your Honor is right. There are 8 acknowledged in I argument before the b epeeific admissions included within those 0 • t. d is our theory of the case that 21 on a Coordinated basis does make a very :2 ((Toy Coin singled out 12 significant difference in terms of motive. :3 he was leading a joint prosecution 22 Thank you, sir. '6 and that Brad was singled out, not only 26 up on an issue-by-Issue basis in order to '7 because of his leadership role, but because 27 determine the relevancy. :5 he faced a particular vulnerability. 28 Thirty-five, again, are the answers t '9 And what Mr. Epstein was attempting to 29 affirmative defenses in all civil cases 20 do was to extort into either 20 against him. Same ruling. T am going to 2: abandoning or compromising the interest of 21 have to take those up on an issue-by-issue 72 his clients and backing off on the 22 basis. '3 prosecution of the Crime Victims' Rights Act 23 Thirty-six. All complaints in which 74 case, which Mr. was prosecuting on a 24 Epstein was a defendant, same ruling. 1 25 pro bono basis almost independently. 25 will have to take those up on an individual + +7 Those things that are stated u r e 2 So that's the relevance and materiality 3 a more concrete type of aff t th e. that we have not directly addressed yet that 2 Court, • is cl rly an issue with regard il other pleadings. Rut the mere existence of to iv intent on Jeffrey Epstein's 20 those other cases that were being prosecute) t that included a number of other 24 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you as well. :5 lawyers prosecuting multiple other cases, 25 Again, 2 am going to have to take these + +2 basis. In other words, that means that I'm going to defer. + +I that now, as well. + +The video footage of the walk-through 4 or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein. probably likely to closely resemble that of i XS. ROOM/MACH: Number 40 was not punitive damages, although it way be also 6 produced. Actually, Mr. scarola and I can this issue of whether or not there's going a might be sane that I agree to. that -- to any of the individuals who are at 9 MR. SCAROLA: They were produced in issue, and their memory as to whether or not '1 have a copy of every one of them. 31 net in Mr. Epstein's home, and could be en '2 MS. RCCKENBACK: Okay, so Jansen's 12 issue of credibility and coo be supported + +3 The newspaper articles, online articles site inspection of Epstein's home is + +7 gat together and look at articles. There to be an exception taken to -- strike + +'0 connection with Mr. Jansen's report. You lo they recall what, if anything, maybe in o- + +', report. So then this exhibit goes to 21 by way of the video. + +:4 Mr. Jansen, which I have a motion to strike 14 Again, I will to t up that •5 and preclude that is in draft form that I IS becomes an issue later :6 was working on last night. So I think then, 24 The proper les, rs ate and plane .7 perhaps, the Court can take that up in the 17 of Mr. EpSt . ain Id be taken up a context of Mr. Jansen's testimony and that is later, if it bee s an issue. '9 notion in that, Mr. Jansen is a damages It Pro c se affidavits prepared 70 expert that has testified about defamatory 20 a. Jeffrey Epstein and + +statements. 21 nq I made earlier regarding + +:X What I started to say is. I would agree 22 r,. Cause. If the affidavit was si to some newspaper articles that try client 2 pr ared against Epstein himself, then it's 24 relied on in bringing the original 4 \*levant, unless it relates to any issues of 25 proceeding, because he has testified that he Mr. ' knowledge and his diligence. + +• relied on these newspaper article I and the like, relating to his preparation of + +7 connected Mr. to Mr. It P his cases. 4 basis for his probable t r nate evidencing Epstein's donation to law i the proceeding. enforcement. + +1 Pon4i scheme and that fo in rt, e Forty-five. Documents relating to or + +6 But as to the noun newspaper XS. ROCKEHOACH: Irrelevant and 7 articles or per cats or Internet hits prejudicial, because then it reflects 9 attache t his r rt that I'm now hearing il can be purchased, and that'S just o are hi 40 -- we would absolutely object 20 inappropriate. It's not appropriate for , • , use ey are not relevant in the 21 malicious prosecution action whatnever. :2 lici0 prosecution action. 12 MCCORT: Well, the likelihood. + +a that Dr. Jensen d -- and I guess are s poorly. It's an insinuation that our Simian + +:3 SCAROIA: If we're going to take up 13 again. I am going to sustain the objection. :5 haven't seen yet, may I suggest that we take 15 have something reasonably to do with this. + +Jansen In response to a motion that we 24 unless I find that -- something that sigh! :6 up Mr. Jansen in response to a motion -- 24 1 understand the intent. But again, any + +-7 THE COURT: At this point, to try to 27 probative value would be materially :a marshal the number of articles, online 28 outweighed by the prejudice and the '7 articles, newspaper articles and 29 relevance. 20 publications related to Jeffrey Epstein is 20 Forty-six. Victim notification lett,. 71 close to impossible, so I'm not going to get 21 from the C.S. Attorney's Office to victi- + +,2 into that right now. 22 Again, I think that more closely aligns 73 Report and analysis of Epstein's 23 itself with that victims' rights case that' + +74 assets, again, likely goes to the punitive 24 being brought. 25 damages aspect. I'm not going to get into 25 Again, I will sustain until such time + +as I find it say have something to do with the issues I described earlier. Mr. Dennison's -- Dr. L. Dennison 4 report of victim. That's an expert? I don't know what that is. 6 MS. POCKEHBACH: Ask Mr. Scarola. 7 Psychological examination of Shane L.R. 8 This is something that was in the fader court action. 'o THE COURT: That was the same lady 1 tried to protect by not using her last name. '2 MS. ROCRENBACH: I apologize. Your ') Honor, and agree to strike that. 4 THR COURT: It's stricken. It will '5 Shane K., middle initial L. It may have 6 been a two-pert name. Just identify her as Shane L.R. That would be the designation we 8 use. 9 MS. ROCKKHBACH: I fail to see the relevance of a pSyChOlOgleal report. THE COURT: Same ruling. Again, it :2 doesn't nave anything to do with the three 53 ladies involved here. :4 Palm Beach Police Department incident 35 report. DOes that have anything to do with + +2 3 4 6 any of the three people here? MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. question, Your Honor? THE COURT: Yes. MR. SCAROLA: I Again, I don't intend 7 time as I have THE COURT: 9 point o unle :2 3 :5 :6 :7 :8 :9 20 71 12 25 0 COURT: Same thing with 49. Same ng with 50. Same ruling with regard to s. • it until IIII cashed ice relevance. ailment. And at this That will be sustained. ise necessary. HACH: I don't have copies MR. SCAROLA: I would only point out - when Your Honor is saying the same ruling. I'm sorry but I'm really not -- THIS COURT: Sustained, unless there's some reason for it to be provided as It relates to the three plaintiffs that Mr. represented, or It has to do with issues concerning his preparation, his evaluation of the cases, and all of the rest of those thing: that t have already + +indicated. And that it would not necessarily the contents of the eXhibit, tut the ability to speak generically about the fact that he had those exhibits on hand when he did what he did. MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. THE COURT: Thanks. Same thing with 52, same ruling. who is Alberto Pinto? what does he 10 have to do with this? 11 MS. ROCKEIIBACH: This is a contractor 12 who my client hired to do a ing project. 23 There is no relevance. the letter. 14 We provided it to the, 25 THE COURT: 14 this? 17 MA. 19 Honor. It 20 21 22 An th1 , Mr. Scarola, position, Your SO\* ruling finding it to event, unless otherwise shown to the elate to Issues pertaining to at the Court has indicated or other? \ say come up later on down the line. 4 repreliminarily going to sustain the objection. + +A + +S I + +1 2 with the punitive aspects. I will defer on those. 4 KC2 emails. MC2 is another person who • has sued Mr. Epstein? II. ROCIUDIOACH: I do not know that • exhibit. 5,08 was the investing company that ▪ **was defrauded by Mr. Rothstein. THR COURT: 3 can't keep track .- 10 MS. ROCKEHBACR: 110. That's not right 21 I got that wrong. I don't have** OHM; 12 email,. I don't. 13 TRH COURT: Can anybody answer who KC? 24 may be? 15 MR. SCAROLA: No. sir. 24 THE COURT: Me will have to take a look 27 at those at a different time. At this point 28 I will reserve. 29 DVD of plea and colloquy. Me talked 20 about that earlier. Sustained, unless it 21 becomes an issue we need to deal with latr, 22 on. Preliminarily it's sustained. 23 Transcript of plea and colloquy taken 24 on 6/30/09. Same ruling. 23 Massage table. Again, unless it Bank statements, tax returns have to do + +becomes an issue as to one of these peoplv 2 indicating that -- strike that. + +Somebody that may indicate that massage was done, someone denying the 5 massage table ever existed, I don't think it's relevant. + +Again, it may come up as to massages a being done and that type of thing, but thn 9 actual table is a good exemplar of going io beyond, over the top of what we need to do here, that is, to bring the actual table. 12 It', not like those instance, where a 3 vehicle iS actually brought into a 1 courtroom, or part of a vehicle is brought 16 in for the jury to use the vehicle outside 16 the courthouse. The vehicle is the actual -- + +N MR. SCAROLA: I don't anticipate I2 bringing a massage table in, air. + +20 THE COURT: All right. :hat's good to 21 know. Thank you. + +22 No contact orders entered against 23 Epstein, criminal Score sheet regarding '4 Epstein, documents evidencing Epstein's Community control and probation, Epstein's + +2 3 4 MR. SCAROLA: May we stop e THE COURT: Yes. Your Honor, was about to rub rough + +sex-offender registrations. + +6 8 THE COURT: Sixty 62 is sustained for t aeons that I've already earlier indicate 0 record. + +:2 :3 :6 A: Yee, es pert or In's sex offender registration. arty in the state of New York -- I'm sure the extent to which it applies elsewhere -- he was obliged to disclose his + +:8 :9 20 71 72 ownership Interest in vehicles, airplanes and residences, that is, he had to list all of those things. And one of the ways that we have identified Jeffrey Epstein's assets is through those sex offender registration disclosures that he was obliged make and did make. + +73 75 So it has to do with punitive damages in addition, perhaps, to something else. But it has to do with punitive damages in + +Sixty-three. stein's sex offender regl + +10 THE COURT: What's its relevancy? + +22 22 ME. SCAROLA: I'm not sure Nr. Epstein is going to be hare. + +23 24 THE COURT: Are you to subpoena him? + +2S 2\$ 27 Mx. SCAMOLA: 110. If he chooses not to %Pe videotaped deposition + +18 ?MR 's fine. + +It 20 21 MA. I want to be able to as the person who got + +22 2 COURT: it could be duplicative of 000. + +2 THE COURT: I will defer. + +20 21 THE COURT: i have already sustained the objection for reasons that were indicated earlier. + +22 23 Mat of Epstein's house Contact,. You have that one? + +24 15 MS. ROCKRIMACH: I do. May I approach, Your Honor? + +24 27 28 THE COURT: Sure. MS. ROcEEHEACH: It's a document titled Vehicles, Mail Deliveries -- + +19 May I retrieve these? + +20 21 22 23 24 23 THE COURT: This looks like his vehicles, grocery stores that he shops at. health and beauty, utilities, storage, mail and delivery services. maintenance, travel, banking, bicycles, bookstore, cleaning service. Entertainment: Breakers, comedy + +particular. + +THE COURT: I will take a look at that when the time comes, if it comes at all. Thank you. + +Booking photographs. Again, same ruling as I made on the other matters regarding the criminal aspects of the ease. + +ME. SCAROLA: This would simply be a photograph, Your Honor. + +MR. SCAROLA: ft may 00. Again, I just want to explain to Your Honor that's why + +it's listed. + +CAD calls. C-A-D. + +MR. SCAROLA: I can't tell you. + +THE COURT: Sustained. + +MS. ROCKEHBACH: I have a copy of the exhibit that Mr. SearOlii provided. They are Palm Beach Police Department -- + +2 3 a corner, Mar-s-Lago. It goes to different servicing companies, such as extermination type of thing. It has a list of names and numbers. + +i Okay, again the same ruling that I made 6 7 earlier, and that is, that it would not be relevant, except for issues that I have 8 discussed earlier that may impact upon i THE COURT: I'm sorry. '0 had, particularly at the time of his employ 10 is facing very substantial jeopardy. And + +1 7 Investigating office, through its chief. IS challenging the way in which his cases are being treated is relevant and material with regard to his taking the highly unusual step of filing a baseless malicious claim against that is, Mr. Epstein filing that claim against + +9 particularly Mr. ' diligence, what he 3 MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Epstein knows that he '1 with the Rothstein firm, and those things I 21 that letter is corroborative of that. It': '2 have already mentioned in the record. 12 part of what he knows when lies the + +') Documents related to Epstein's 23 claim. '5 that we will take up et a later time. is MS. ROCKENEACII: next set of item: + +:6 investments would be a punitive damage issue la THE COURT: She ion sustained. + +\*6 Letter from Chief Reiter from the Palm it 70 through 74, a letters from .1 Beach Police Department to harry Krischer, 39 Mr. Epetei y Pronstin, prior 8 it should be, instead of Krisehler, T ts counsel, o the a utent State Attorney + +'5 presume. It manna Bel ve from the Office of the 20 XS. ROCKINTRACK: That's correct. it's 20 tOrney. They are all different, but dated Vey let, 2006. 21 relate to -- for instance, Exhibit 23 Sixty-nine is a list of planes owned by 2 at rney fee payment where my client had necessary, for the punitive damages was going to be giving a statement to the + +22 THE COURr: Let me take a look at it. 22 . 0 is a disclosure of third-party + +:4 Epstein. That would be. again. reserved. if a tiered to PaY for his house manager, who 75 + +?C ' HASir • component of the ease. I assistant state attorney. And it vas in + +2 Did you see these letters 2 compliance with ethical rules. It + +3 MR. SCAROIA: It's bee 1 t + +1 5 THE COURT: I cool I n hat relevancy it would haw to do I this. + +6 Unless you can provide additional + +I information, it ustained. actually is -- but it has no relevance. + +'that's the point. It actually is a good thing. but here it shouldn't come in, + +because we are just getting too far astr7y. + +I have these documents and these + +8 Pronstin. one of Mr. Epstein's f folders if Your Honor would like t0 100k at + +) ottani, b t one ? il them. + +o . KENBACK: Yee, Your manor. 20 MR. SCAROLA: Part of what all the + +all ON -- Exhibits 70, 71. 11 attorneys prosecuting claims against e + +:2 4, are all letters from -- 12 Epstein were dealing with, including Brad + +3 SCAROIA: I'm sorry. I'm having 23 was the degree of control that + +ficulty doing two things at once. I'm 24 Mr. Epstein was exercising over various + +:5 reading this letter. I would like -- I 15 witnesses. And those letters evidence the + +:6 would like to comment that the Palm Bosch 26 degree of control that Jeffrey Epstein w2.- + +- 7 Police Department was the principle 37 exercising over various witnesses who wore + +'8 investigating agency with regard to these 28 part of the then ongoing criminal + +- 3 claims. And obviously, the chief's position 29 investigation. That is why such things a: + +20 with regard to these claims is reflective of 20 the depositions of pilots and the + +2: the quality of the claims that was called 21 subpoenaing of flight logs and the necessity + +22 Into question in the complaint by 22 to try to find third parties who were not + +72 Mr. Epstein. 23 under Mr. hpstein's influence to give sworn + +74 So to the extent that Mr. Epstein iS 24 testimony concerning what was going on on 25 aware of the fact that the chief 25 airplanes became necessary. + +1 [REDACTED] be relevant + 2 if we were trying Mr. [REDACTED]' cases that + 3 were settled. They are not remotely + 4 relevant in this action. + +5 THE COURT: I tend to agree. Again, + 6 for the same reasons that I ruled earlier, I + 7 sustain the objection to these letters from + 8 this attorneys -- Mr. Epstein's attorneys to + 9 the assistant State Attorney. + +10 Mr. Goldberger's letters, 75. + +11 [REDACTED] I approach, Your + 12 Honor? It is dated June 22nd. + +13 THE COURT: Off the record. + +14 (A discussion was held off the record.) + +15 THE COURT: I made an error confusing + 16 Mr. Salnick with Mr. Krischer. I apologize + 17 to them both. So I will need to take a look + 18 at that letter from Chief Reiter again and + 19 see if it changes my thought process in that + 20 regard. + +21 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, I have it, + 22 if you want to take another look. It + 23 encloses a probable cause affidavit and case + 24 filing, packages from the police + 25 department -- Palm Beach Police Department + +1 from the chief of police. + +2 THE COURT: Sure. Sorry about that. + +3 I'm going to take the same position as + 4 to number 68, so it's sustained for the + 5 reasons I have earlier indicated. + +6 Number 75, the letter from + 7 Mr. Goldberger to Mr. Krischer. + +8 Do you want to comment Mr. Scarola? + +9 MR. SCAROLA: No, Your Honor. Same + 10 argument. + +11 THE COURT: Same ruling. I'm going to + 12 sustain it. Also, it carries with it the + 13 potential of Mr. Goldberger having to be a + 14 witness. I just don't see it as necessarily + 15 even tangentially related to the three cases + 16 that we have. + +17 I don't know if one of these young + 18 women were part of this. The one who is + 19 described here is not listed, even by + 20 initials, so I will take the same position I + 21 have taken earlier. + +22 MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, number 76, + 23 I'm not sure if you need the packet, but + 24 it's subpoenas that were issued. + +1 have made earlier with regard to other + 2 matters concerning the criminal file. + +3 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. + +4 THE COURT: The documents related to + 5 the rental of vehicles for [REDACTED]. + 6 Who is she? + +7 MS. ROCKENBACH: I don't know that -- I + 8 would have to have Mr. Scarola explain why + 9 rental -- and I don't even see rental + 10 agreements. I would expect to see a rental + 11 car: Alamo, Hertz or something. This + 12 document that was produced is FedEx labels, + 13 priority overnight FedEx labels to my client + 14 at his Palm Beach residence with a + 15 handwritten note and it says, "Contract up + 16 on February 2nd." Then it has a handwritten + 17 note Dollar Rent a Car. No relevance. + +18 THE COURT: I don't know who this is. + +19 Do you have any idea who we are talking + 20 about here? + +21 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +22 THE COURT: Same ruling. + +23 Ted Shed. + +24 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +25 THE COURT: Same ruling. + +1 Documents related to the property + 2 searches of Jeffrey Epstein's property. + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +4 THE COURT: Same ruling. + +5 Arrest warrant of [REDACTED]? + +6 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +7 THE COURT: Same ruling. + +8 Police report regarding [REDACTED] + 9 picking up money, dated 11/28/04. + +10 MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +11 THE COURT: Same ruling. These are all + 12 sustained, unless shown to the Court later + 13 that there's a particular relevance to any + 14 of these documents. That's the same ruling + 15 I have indicated. + +16 Eighty-two. List of Trilateral + 17 Commission Members of 2003. Do you know + 18 what that is? + +19 MS. ROCKENBACH: I still don't, even + 20 after looking at the document. But it is on + 21 a website Bible Believers.org, a nine-page + 22 document with individual names of people. + +23 THE COURT: It's refreshing the Bible + 24 is being mentioned during all of this. + +THE COURT: Same ruling. 2 Alan DerShOwitzt'S letter dated April 19th, '06, and statute 90.410. I 4 guess this has to do with similar activity. Sane argument? + +SCAROLA: This is slightly 7 different, Your Honor. This has to do with 8 the allegation that there was a significant 9 change in the approach to prosecution of these cases after Brad was employed • at RRA. And one of the elements that is :2 cited to is that he begins to take discovery 3 with regard to other victims. + +:4 In fact, there were multiple activities '5 that occurred prior to brad's employment :6 with KRA that were directed at the discovery of matters relating to other victims. And • the federal statute requires that a notice be given to the other side of the intent to 20 rely upon evidence with regard to other victims. + +:2 THE COURT: Did you take :3 Mr. Dershowit2'S deposition as it relates to :4 this case? + +'s RR. SCAROLA: No, sir. But I have had + +the pleasure of deposing Mr. Dern . 2 THE COURT: Not as it rest es 1 case? + +4 YR. SCAROLA: No. M\$. ROCERNHACK: do not hss,e a copy • of the letter. Your Hon was not in • production. + +8 THE COURT: cif defer on that on, 9 pr a In let . Again, goes with the same ro t ions that I earlier indicated. + +Vat :2 ein'S account information. :3 ROcKENRACH: I don't know what that + +ns. It was not produced. THE COURT: It will have to be produced :6 in the meantime. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes. I hope it will :8 It is listed, although it has not yet been :9 produced by Mr. Epstein in anticipation of 20 his being ordered to produce it. + +THE COURT: Eighty-six. Rpstein's Iz criminal close-out sheet will, again, be 23 sustained for reasons earlier stated on the 74 record. + +10 Case. Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 vs. US + +21 12 MR. SCAROLA: That's the CVRA care. Your Manor. + +23 THE COURT: That wi y be + +34 15 24 IT discussed -- obvious' discussed. How much o e pleadings that need to be addr a matter of the Court's co -ter. + +It 20 MR. Those are lust a to deposition excerpts. + +21 22 COURT: Reiter letter to Krischer. heady been talked about. That's a + +number OS is Hyperion Alr passenger xenifest. Same ruling. Same thing with the flight information. + +Eighty-nine. Passenger list. 90, arm. ruling. + +Notepad/notes, Maria. + +MR. SCAROLA: Same argument. + +THE COURT: Same ruling. + +Rpst in Elf endment Speech. + +icetion, unless he wrote another one. + +SPie + +Check. I think it's a duplication. You can f. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: Sixty-eight isn't dated. • This one is dated. I don't know whether they're two different letters or the same one, Your Honor. + +MS. ROCKRNOACH: Ninety-four. It manot produced to me. + +THE COURT: I'm going t0 assume that • it's the same unless it's produced • Separately. And it will be ordered to be 20 produced separately within IS days, if not 21 already done. + +12 Just like anything else, I'm ordering 23 it be produced -- that I say have ordered in 24 the past -- within a 1S-day period. + +15 Ninety-six. police 24 report. Same ruling, same position taken by 27 Mr. counsel. + +16 victim's -- individual -- says 29 victim's -- not plural -- school records and 20 transcripts. I don't know which victim 21 you're talking about. Maybe it's the young 22 lady who was the model student, as discussed 23 earlier, allegedly prior to Mr. Epstein's 24 involvement. + +THE COURT: She's not one of the people 2 involved here today. XS. RocKKKBACR: That's correct. 4 TBR COURT: 1 will sustain it. MS. ROCM631RACH: Your Honor, if I way. 6 I think I haven sampling of this \*shit:- 7 All the pages I have in front of me say Shane R. 9 THE COURT: Ninety-seven would be the same ruling. Ninety-eight, the same ruling. :2 Ninety-nine, the same ruling. 11 One hundred. All surveillance conducted by law enforcement on Spotein's '3 home. Same ruling. :6 One hundred one. trails received by Palm beach Records related to Jeffrey :8 Epstein. '9 Who Is Pals Beach records? :0 XS. ROCKKNHACK: T don't know, and 7 don't have the exhibit. It was not :2 PrOdUtOd. :3 THE COURT: Again, to be Produced. 74 this titre sustained. Same ruling. '5 One hundred and two. All items listed At + +3 6 :2 :3 :6 :8 :9 20 71 72 'I 25 on the Palm Beach Police Deportee rty report lists. Same ruling. One hundred and three. of convictions related to In. I ve already ruled on that, c lass obally that, until further in done and further inform\* le received regarding the pleas arW to ey apply, 1 am not in a pojaClon to • definitive ruling on that. huijled and six -- strike that. hundred and four is Jeffrey criminal records. That mirrors of the things I've indicated. It would be sustained pending further inquiry or review based upon reasons stated already by the Court. One hundred and five. All documents produced by Palm Beach Police Department prior to the deposition of Detective Recarey, R-K-C-A-R-R-Y. Again, same ruling. I'm just going to ignore 106. it's a catch-all I usually don't rule on any way. One hundred and thirteen. All + +Pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims' Rights Act prosecuted by on behalf of victinof Kpstein's criminal molestation. As 1 have done earlier, to be consistent, t sustain the objection Decoy. of it's breadth, lack of specificity, without prejudice, to specific documents being provided within 15 days to the 10 attorneys for Epstein. 21 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. We are 12 talking about 1132 23 THE COURT: Yee. 34 MR. SCAROLA: Th those. 15 Your Honor. Mr. Pate entered an 34 appearance in was permitted to 27 t hay got all of those 28 pleadings • also -- It THE hat's fine. But I could 20 5. that in -- I think somebody 21 eight or nine years' litigation -- 22 Mr. di/pollen pointed out earlier, not Y one of those documents are going to be •4 010vant here. KO whatever the plaintiff is Peeking to introduc, as a result of that + +2 10 31 12 23 24 15 It 27 28 39 20 21 22 23 24 23 should be culled and should be provided to the other side. MR. SCAROLA: And sy response to that is, as 1 stand here right now, I don't know. 7 am listing it because it is potentially relevant. There's obviously been a lot of diaCuSeiOn to the Crime Victims' Rights ACt Case. And if Your Honor yenta me CO duplicate everything been filed in that Case -- THE COURT: That's not what Suggesting, Mr. Scarola. What I'm sayIng := the problem that I have and how I usually rule on those setters is that when a file is identified as all pleadings and attachments. particularly whereas here, your client is an attorney who is the lead attorney in the prosecution of the CVRA claims, then he should be aware of what would be relevant as it relates to his malicious prosecution claim against Epstein. Hot all of those documents will be relevant. I wouldn't expect a defendant in a malicious prosecution claim, Epstein, to have to review the -- attorneys in + +particular -- having to review all the MR. SCAROLA: Yes. sir. to light or 2 documents and guessing which ones may or n, the Court's ruling -- and I don't mean to be 5 the issue that I'm dealing with. take 113, and I would have a separate 7 provided to them -- 15 days maybe a little would produce every pleading on PACER. And 9 going to give you -- 1/13, 30 days. something that Your Honor believes that I + +3 not be introduced or sought to be introduced arguing after the ruling. I only want to 4 or considered to be introduced. So thy— understand it. What I would do is I would + +6 They must be culled and they must be listing of every pleading on PACER, and I a short in light of the holiday season, so I'm I don't want to do that if I'm doing + +'0 MS. ROCKPARACH: Shank you, Your Honor. lo ought not to be doing. + +'1 MR. SCAROLA: May I simply state that 31 SHE COURT: The reason why I say that '2 knowing what Mr. Epstein is going to attempt 11 that's involved here. II o, clearly '5 every pleading in the Crime Victims' Rights IS of medical records, wh er we're dealing 6 Act ease is potentially relevant? And every 36 with a set of p ychi Ic ecords, I one of those pleadings is available on 17 admissions -ital admissions to s PACER. And he is a party to the litigation. ts psychiatr C facil t es, rehabilitation 9 So to Comply with the Court's order ..., I It facilitie - I eve seen thousands of '4 in that case that is on PACER so that I have 4 believe to be relevant. 25 the flexibility to introduce whatever I Mal, There are a number of documents that + +'2 at this stage in this litigation, not 12 is, number one, we already h enough paper 6 to say with regard to the defense, that 14 in my view, whether w alin with a set 20 don't want co do something that Your Honor 20 a. rule done in camera inspections is telling me I ought not to do. hut to Si nda of documents. I have culled 22 comply with the order as you have described 22 fr. m -- probably often out of thousand, :.1 it, I would simply duplicate every pleading 2 of ocumenta -- 30, 40. 50, 70 pages of what + +XV;;;SY 224 2 THE COURT: That's why my ug a 2 individual per day that has no relevancy at s It would be the s thin f you were think of right off the top of any head. But + +• need to. I deal with food that was eaten by a given I it would be -- that the obj io all whatsoever with the treatment. 4 sustained as the exhibi ph 1 There are other things that I can't 6 to stand here today •• re in while they have to be documented by the I trial -- and sa re are the 3.000 docket hospital, they have to be documented by T., 2 entries to the C ctims' Rights Act 7 rehab facility, they are not nee SSSSS ily 9 case, a want lull,to review all ii relevant to the inquiry at issue and can l 0 3,00 t entries, which comprise 7,000 30 culled out. 2 No, the Jury is not going to go 12 being the lead attorney on that case. 3 th all of those without exactly knowing 13 despite Mr. Epstein being an intervener a- + +1d say. No. it is not specific 11 Whit I'm fay" is. with your client t they are looking for. 14 some nature in that case. it's still I And so as phrased, the objection is 15 incumbent upon the party offering the 7 I have given you the opportunity to 17 compilation. And that is what I'm requiring + +:6 sustained. 26 exhibits to present the most narrow :s otherwise remedy the situation. Rut if 18 you to do. :9 that's the response that I'm getting -- and 39 I gave you and your client 30 days to + +20 I respect that -- then that's the ruling of 20 cull those documents that In good faith are 21 the Court. 21 going to be sought and be admitted, not the 73 MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry. Again, I 23 admitting all of the docket entries over an + +'2 One hundred fourteen -- 22 entirety, because the likelihood of me 74 would, in light of Your Honor's comments -- 24 eight-year period or nine-year period -- 25 THE COURT: It was actually a ruling. 23 whatever it might -- for highly unlikely + +because of jury confusion, because of tine 2 and consideration of the jury's time when it 3 comes to that. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: And 1 would never offer it all. + +6 THE COURT: So that's exactly what I'm 7 trying to say. The 3O-day lead time that 1 8 am giving is in consideration of the amount 9 of documentation that would have to be reviewed, and that since Mr. would 1 likely be in the best position to be able to '2 cull out those documents that would '3 reasonably be calculated to be introduced • into evidence. + +'1 So that's the order of the Court. If 6 you take me up on it, that's fine. If you 7 don't, then, again, I an sustaining the • objection as phrased in number 113. So 9 that's with the caveat Chet I have described and offered CO you. + +Y.R. VITALE: Your Honor, with regard to :2 101, you had given us 15 days to produce. :3 WOuld that also be extended to 30 clays, :4 given the holiday? + +23 THE COVET: WO. because, again. + +everything, other than what I come up with. I think you already s 0 produced it. And if it has b p,, n that should be 15 days. + +The Crime Victims lengthier and Comprises of litigation. if much or eight years exhibit list was Compiled and sen t 9 November, which is 4000 t roe or ur day. Short - bust Ae s short of a month, so they ho have been produced, bUt hive :2 those things that Ms. Rockenbach is :3 ng haven't been that would be 15 other than number 113. + +Number 114. Motion for :6 Summary Judgment. The Court would Ilk\* to 7 take judicial notice. + +:8 Y.S. RocKENITACH: I don't know that it'. :9 an exhibit for the jury to consider. This 20 might go to -- 1 think -- I'm guessing -- it 7: was going to go to a legal argument before 72 Your Honor as to whether there was a bona 73 fide termination when my client dismissed 74 the original proceeding that he brought 25 against Mr. I'll'''. + +THE COURT: Perhaps. If it's an issue of fact, then it will be overruled. Mr. Scarola. you want to get heard? + +MR. SCAROLA: That's exactly what I was going to say, Your Honor. + +If they are contending that there's an issue of fact as to whether there was a bona fide termination, then the circumstance under which the voluntary dismissal was 10 taken is obviously relevant and material. 21 What it was that was Jeffrey Epstein 12 declined to defend against ls4elevant and 23 material. + +24 THE COURT: It t rule 15 One hundred and een is time rec: tir fi and hourly bill nq a scion produced in 1/ discovery. + +Is t and that rds' claim of lost time thing? + +a. SCAROLA: Yea, Your Honor. COURT: Well, that may come in as wages to the malicious prosecution + +Rave you received any of that yet? MS. ROCKEMRACM: T have a circle hero, + +weaning that it was not produced in the context and pursuant to the Court's order. + +THE COURT: You might want to get with Mr. Vitale and see if you can -- + +MR. SCAROLA: It was produced prior to Mr. itPet0121.6 deposition. In response to a request for production, all or th080 time records have been produced. + +THE COURT: Again, as I said with regard to 113, the documents have to be culled to sone degree so that it can be given to the other side as the exhibit that's being sought to be introduced at trial. + +At this time it may still be going on, so it may not be completed up to the time of the trial. Just like medical records, sometimes If there's ongoing treatment, even though somebody is at maximum medical improvement but they are still treating, there could still be a continuing type of exhibit. + +MR. SCAROLA: These are time records of Mr. ' time devoted to the defense c' the maliciously filed claim. Once that + +claim was dismissed, he was no longer 1 at a special-set hearing. So 1 would 2 devoting time to the defense of the claim. suggest that we set something in the near + +3 Those records have all been produced. future for a half-hour hearing so that we 4 They have been specifically identified. He can deal with those issues independently. 5 has segregated out time spent in defense of think it's worth some tire to be taken. 7 that exhibit. and produced to the FBI by Rodriguez. + +6 the case from anything else, and they have Phone journal taken from Epstein's home a But if they need it to be re-produced That's the houseman. Same ruling as I msde + +9 to them again, and Your Honor directs that earlier with regard to that. "1 reproduce it again. 21 and Prince Andrew. + +'0 we need to re-produce it again, we will 10 Photograph depicting Maxwel: + +:2 THE COVET: Again, I'm not directing 12 MS. RCCONIUBACE: No red nee to this 3 another reproduction. Perhaps, as I said, 33 action. It's prejudicia '5 Hs. Rockenbach and it can be taken care of 15 MR. SCAR091: Tee r. Same argument. :6 without further judicial intervention. I am 26 THE COURT: unless further + +:4 Hr. Vitale can handle that issue with 34 THE COURT: Same et, . Sterol.? + +'7 sure it can. IT informatio v • bring to the Court + +"0 Next is all claims filed by EPStein in ts Otherwis :0 would have to see those when the time cores. 20 Same ruling. + +'9 the Rothsteinbankruptcyproceeding. I 19 All ht OBS. We talked about those + +:2 All submissions by Epstein in Connection with the Rothstein deposition. :3 Again, I will see those when the time COMS. 2 M ng. 'S All settlement agreements between that. the source of information regarding + +21 22 nee of contributions t0 the Pei, Bea lice Department. Sustained. Sam. + +:4 if necessary. 7 will defer on those two. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Tee. sir. I did speak of + +S HCASSr' • Epstein and victims of sexual mol one. I his assets. 4 three individuals at is 1 to deal with it. , 6 MR. SCAROLA: You Honor, t ere have been objections that has raised to the Is of a Contractual f ntiality provision. 9 25, 2O11. + +2 Again, I would have to see the w - 2 inn COURT: And I think I deferred on 3 time comes. I am most inte to t • that. If I didn't, that's the way I'm going + +One hundred and thirty-two, New York Post article: billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: 7 production of t documents On the basis I'm a sex offender, not a predator. February + +9 If allege on remains that these S Mn. SCAROLA: These are direct quotes :2 •S at least discoverable with regard 12 children as the equivalent of Stealing a 1 to ng a determination as to whether the 23 bagel. + +'0 case -- a three at issue -- were somehow 20 from Mr. Epstein. It's the article in which , n the value of the claims in 21 he compares the abuse inflicted upon + +ims were ginned up. le THE COURT: Cnsworn statement out of + +:5 And again, the degree of financial 15 court being used to prove the truth of the :6 exposure that Xr. Epstein was facing Is 16 wetter asserted? :2 reflected by the settlements of all of the 22 MR. SCAROLA: No, sir. Being used to :0 claims that he ultimately settled after the is prove the fact that the statement was mad-, :9 filing of this maliciously -- allegedly 29 being used to prove the state of the + +20 maliciously prosecuted lawsuit. 20 speaker's rind, and being used for purpose + +2: So we will be asking the Court to 21 of the jury's f punitive 22 compel production of all of those settlement 22 damages. 23 agreements. 23 We don't contend that molesting + +24 THE COVET: That's something that 24 children is the equivalent of stealing a 25 probably will need to be dealt with probably 25 bagel. + +2 2 a If we were introducing this statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted. we would be advocating that molesting a child is the equivalent of stealing a bagel. 1 Mr. iiPStein doe' show up for trial, one of the very first questions I'm going to ask him is, Did you wake this statement to thr New York newspaper? + +5 6 2 INK cOlnir: No. I'm not sure that's the way that the hearsay rule is implemented. + +'0 9 Ils. Rockanbach, your position? ?IS. ROCKRNSACM: Thank you. We did + +IRK COURT: Like I said, we will cal that up when time comes. Me can further discuss the objections at the same time we are going to be discussing the -- all settlement agreements, 119. All right. + +'o raise h . We raised relevance. We 10 MS. ROCKKSBACK: Thank you, Your Honor. + +• raised probative value substantially 11 TRIC COURT: Thanks a lot to our court '2 outweighed by the danger or unfair 12 reporter for staying and wor 9 through '3 prejudice, confusion. misleading the jury, 23 this. as we have, today. + +:4 as well as hearsay and authenticity. 24 MR. SCAROLA: I that are + +'5 This is a very good example of an IS going to deal with lei ndsent issue/ :6 inflamsatory exhibit by Mr. , and it 25 the first issue r onvene? 'I seeks to try to prove. I guess, that my 2/ 7MK thought we talk\*\*, I client is a bad person or bad character is about th e alre '3 evidence under 90.404. This is hearsay end lt MA. ' No, no. You remember :0 It should not be admitted. It would be 20 t• dentifled every question and answer? + +inflammatory and very prejudicial to my 21 COURT.: You are talking about the 22 client. 22 Ind 01 questions and answers. Yes, Sir. + +:1 THE COCK,: Any request for admissions :4 sent out in response to that article? + +2\ And we will take those up 4 fret. and thenowefwillrgoetoithoomotions,to Compel and n or ve rder. + +11 MR. SCAROLA: There may have been. + +4Itk i, Sir 236 + +• There certainly were deposition ns I we have the time, okay? ? concerning whether Mr. Wpsteln 2 Remember on Thursday, we're pretty much 1 a i 6 1 statements to any third par re any of his molestation clai , nd erted the fifth Amendment wi repay o those. So we would have the be f an adverse inference in th ard. + +going to limit us to the morning. So we are going to from 10 to 12, 12:30, then that will be it. Okay. So try and govern your arguments accordingly, if you would, please. + +1 ale going to give you these trateri•IS + +8 And the eta n of a party opponent a back. 2 is not rsay tement. l'w sorry. il Mr. Scared., as 1 said, l's going to o Ther a exception to the hearsay rule for 10 impose upon you to prepare the orders as T •2 to state of mind. And clearly the 12 this point, since we do have thine actual '1 is attitude about the offense he 23 questions, that we can really prepare an :5 damages claim. 15 to the Fifth Amendment global rulings that + +OEM of a party opponent. Rut it 21 have already indiCated. I'm not sure at tted is highly relevant in a punitive 24 order until we get this done on Thursday as 'a of concern to me in this particular context 26 once I have had an opportunity to go through + +:6 MR COURT: I recognise the party 26 the Court has already made. And it may - 7 opponent issue. Again, its application is 27 become more focused and be more specific '9 where the information comes from. a 39 all of these. And I appreciate the fact 20 newspaper. 20 that you have done that and gotten them to + +71 So I would have to take a look at it. 21 + +22 Maybe we can set that at the same time we 22 In the meantime what I'm going to do is + +71 are going to set that other issue about the 23 I'm going to keep some of this material. + +74 other victims' information. 24 MR. LINK: Judge, thank you for your 25 MR. SCAROLA: I can assure you that, if 25 time today. We appreciate your patience for + +1 giving us so much time. +2 THE COURT: Have a good day. See you +3 back Thursday at 10, okay. + +4 - - - +5 (The above proceedings were +6 concluded at 4:35 p.m.) +7 +8 +9 +10 +11 +12 +13 +14 +15 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20 +21 +22 +23 +24 +25 + +1 COURT CERTIFICATE + +2 +3 +4 STATE OF FLORIDA ) +5 : SS +6 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) + +7 I, SONJA D. WALL, certify that I was +8 authorized to and did stenographically report the +9 foregoing proceedings and that the transcript is a +10 true record of my stenographic notes. + +11 +12 +13 Dated this 7th day of December 2017. +14 +15 +16 + +17 \_\_\_\_\_ +18 +19 +20 +21 +22 +23 +24 +25 SONJA D. ██████████ + +| A | | | | | +|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| a.m 1:16 61:17,17
95:16 | accomplished
112:10,13 | 159:8 160:3
168:10 201:9,11 | 151:5,12 152:16
195:19 | 177:20
Air 215:1 | +| AB 189:11 | account 35:8 111:10
111:25 133:16
214:12 | 201:17 236:12
AD 179:2,4 180:7
add 24:13 30:13,19
104:12 | affirmative 3:4,17
3:19 7:21 9:6,21
10:1,4,8,18,20
12:17,18 14:1,4
14:10,14 21:2,5
23:11,12,13,20,22
23:25 24:3,8,12
25:4 27:8,23 28:5
28:8 29:3 34:4,13
34:25 35:3,13,22
36:20,21 37:11
40:18 48:6,8,21
49:2,8,12 50:1,8
51:25 52:22 53:3
53:4,7 54:1 56:24
75:9 188:21
192:19 | airplane 65:21,22
66:4 79:2 156:7
156:11 164:11
airplanes 72:12
202:16 208:25
akin 150:10 151:22
Alamo 211:11
Alan 213:2
albeit 27:22 78:5
Alberto 199:9
Alexandra 212:8
216:15
align 80:20
aligns 196:22
allegation 6:16
41:20 42:9 68:12
82:14 84:4,10,24
86:19 139:7,16,17
144:23 213:8
230:9
allegations 3:24 4:5
5:9 6:23 7:19,22
8:14 9:3,25 16:15
17:15 23:16 31:11
31:19,22,23 37:5
43:17 47:8,24
67:19,21,22 71:21
71:22 73:5 74:5
77:8 87:4 88:9
123:25 136:20
139:6,15,20 142:4
145:19 184:4
186:20,23 187:13
187:17
allege 12:17 27:17
alleged 16:24 34:9
65:3,13 67:18
68:21 80:4,19,20
80:21 81:10 84:13
89:22 101:4
106:11 157:22
allegedly 40:22
51:12 216:23
230:19
alleges 67:6
alleging 27:16
allow 10:11 11:5
28:15 29:9,11
30:5 52:24 75:11
102:9 106:15
110:18 154:12
allowed 8:25 9:2,24
10:13 14:23 27:8
99:14 106:2 117:8
136:18 182:23,25
allowing 18:24
28:23,24 146:13 | +| | accomplished
112:10,13 | additional 21:2
206:6
Additionally 49:13
address 55:10 57:6
104:17 105:12
107:13 108:25
123:12 148:8
156:6,9
addressed 13:16,17
13:18,20 19:12
28:25 49:11 53:7
128:21 192:3
215:16
addresses 50:9
adequately 44:25
adjudging 178:5
adjudicate 128:16
adjusting 96:13
Adler 65:8 116:4
admissible 65:12
72:8 120:6,17
186:8,9
admission 163:22
171:6 189:5
admissions 189:24
192:8 223:17,17
233:23
admit 23:15 58:9
admitted 59:18,18
145:14 224:21
233:20
admittedly 113:24
admitting 224:23
adopt 158:14
adopting 131:24
148:17
advantage 120:8
adverse 110:19,21
125:5 163:23
178:12 234:6
advertises 37:8
advice 10:6,15
advisory 146:8
186:3,4
advocates 100:16
advocating 233:3
affect 190:3
affidavit 162:4
195:22 209:23
affidavits 138:15 | affirmatively 10:15
18:18
afforded 38:12
47:11 61:9
afield 80:3 141:15
aforesaid 1:20
95:20
afternoon 55:18,20
55:24 91:19 92:9
92:23 93:14
AG 189:9
age 78:4 102:15
166:6,6 167:3
agency 206:18
agents 129:2
ago 116:22 173:6
agree 33:6 57:15
86:9,13 143:23
144:5 170:17
193:8,22 197:13
209:5
agreed 102:16
103:23 183:9
agreeing 50:19
agreement 48:13
52:1 76:6 98:9,11
98:17,19,21 99:1
99:11,17,24 103:7
104:23 106:6,23
110:14 111:7
115:24 118:25
120:4,12,25 121:6
155:16 160:10
182:17 183:1
agreements 211:10
229:25 230:23
235:9
ahead 3:13 93:1
96:6 102:23
109:25 160:23 | airplane 65:21,22
66:4 79:2 156:7
156:11 164:11
airplanes 72:12
202:16 208:25
akin 150:10 151:22
Alamo 211:11
Alan 213:2
albeit 27:22 78:5
Alberto 199:9
Alexandra 212:8
216:15
align 80:20
aligns 196:22
allegation 6:16
41:20 42:9 68:12
82:14 84:4,10,24
86:19 139:7,16,17
144:23 213:8
230:9
allegations 3:24 4:5
5:9 6:23 7:19,22
8:14 9:3,25 16:15
17:15 23:16 31:11
31:19,22,23 37:5
43:17 47:8,24
67:19,21,22 71:21
71:22 73:5 74:5
77:8 87:4 88:9
123:25 136:20
139:6,15,20 142:4
145:19 184:4
186:20,23 187:13
187:17
allege 12:17 27:17
alleged 16:24 34:9
65:3,13 67:18
68:21 80:4,19,20
80:21 81:10 84:13
89:22 101:4
106:11 157:22
allegedly 40:22
51:12 216:23
230:19
alleges 67:6
alleging 27:16
allow 10:11 11:5
28:15 29:9,11
30:5 52:24 75:11
102:9 106:15
110:18 154:12
allowed 8:25 9:2,24
10:13 14:23 27:8
99:14 106:2 117:8
136:18 182:23,25
allowing 18:24
28:23,24 146:13 | + +| allows 27:6 66:14 | 129:14 | 191:8 202:14 | 215:7 226:21 | 178:11 | +|--------------------|---------------------|---------------------|-----------------------|---------------------| +| alluding 113:18 | announced 83:14 | apply 13:12 15:7 | 231:14,15 | asserts 21:6 | +| altered 21:13 | answer 3:4 10:3 | 16:20 25:13 27:1 | arguments 27:11 | assessment 232:21 | +| alternative 120:22 | 57:1 79:11 81:4 | 27:22 28:1 29:20 | 46:25 60:10,11,13 | assets 163:2 181:5 | +| 120:23 | 87:16 101:25 | 50:16 52:12 218:8 | 117:10 124:24 | 194:24 202:19 | +| ambiguity 187:6 | 105:23,25 109:19 | appointment 156:7 | 131:5 150:2 236:6 | 232:1 | +| amenable 51:4 | 120:14 138:10 | 156:10 | arises 115:8 163:20 | assignment 8:5 | +| amend 3:4,16 10:13 | 186:2 200:13 | appreciate 30:11 | arose 17:15 | assistance 173:1 | +| 10:15 11:5 13:22 | 235:20 | 33:11 39:18 46:23 | arrest 128:25 | 180:6 191:1 | +| 14:23 20:10 28:12 | answered 38:14 | 85:9,24 94:19 | 184:18 185:5 | assistant 207:18 | +| 28:23 29:13 32:4 | 138:10,13 | 97:25 103:2 105:1 | 212:5 | 208:1 209:9 | +| 51:22 53:11 54:6 | answering 138:5 | 135:20 146:13 | arrows 125:7 | associated 71:9 | +| 57:1 105:8 | answers 41:25 55:8 | 158:1 173:1 | article 49:16 52:15 | 121:15 | +| amendable 28:2 | 163:11 188:21 | 236:19,25 | 71:9 76:10 232:6 | associating 8:9 | +| 53:24 | 189:5 190:1 | appreciated 72:21 | 232:10 233:24 | assume 61:21 64:5 | +| amended 62:25 | 192:18 235:22 | appreciates 123:14 | articles 193:3,3,7,23 | 125:17 139:12 | +| amending 27:6 | anti-trust 13:8 | approach 8:1 62:24 | 194:1,7,18,19,19 | 159:15 216:7 | +| 107:11 | 36:11,12,17 48:18 | 64:11 81:22 | articulate 155:14 | 235:14 | +| amendment 12:25 | 53:13 | 130:24 167:24 | aside 16:22 94:4 | assuming 23:17 | +| 13:24 27:7 28:3 | anticipate 118:22 | 204:14 209:11 | 98:8,25 99:10 | 62:21 120:1 | +| 28:15 29:7,10 | 123:8 201:18 | 213:9 | 106:5,22 110:1,13 | assure 234:25 | +| 48:25 52:24 53:5 | anticipated 118:3,6 | appropriate 22:14 | 110:25 111:6,10 | astray 76:17 172:25 | +| 54:15 55:11 | anticipation 214:19 | 57:22 101:23 | 119:1,1,2 120:25 | 208:6 | +| 100:21 101:21 | any/all 163:1 | 131:21 149:9 | 121:7 128:15 | attached 20:9 162:7 | +| 108:16 109:9 | anybody 54:10 | 155:18 164:15 | 139:11 | 194:9 | +| 110:16 114:25 | 101:5 111:14 | 196:10 | asked 11:4 34:18 | attachments 219:1 | +| 119:5,9 120:13,21 | 200:13 | approximately | 40:18,19 53:22 | 220:15 | +| 126:16,23 127:18 | anymore 130:12 | 132:6 153:23 | 54:15 70:21,25 | attacked 27:9 | +| 147:21 163:21 | anyway 182:1 | April 183:19 184:20 | 71:3 90:4 111:16 | attacking 29:13 | +| 164:2,6 178:11 | apologize 92:5,25 | 184:21 213:3 | 136:24 138:6 | attempt 32:11 | +| 215:18 234:5 | 105:17,19 135:20 | area 40:3 106:18 | 176:17 178:23 | 51:21 76:18 80:20 | +| 235:15 236:15 | 197:12 209:16 | arguable 38:15 | 112:22 125:22 | 80:21 82:13 106:5 | +| amendments 27:5 | apparent 59:16 | arguably 42:24 | 143:18 145:16 | 106:22 125:4 | +| 27:12,20 30:5 | appeal 119:18,20,21 | 79:21 108:14 | 143:18 145:16 | 147:4 221:13 | +| 49:15 52:14 | 119:23,24 123:5 | 140:19 | 230:21 | attempted 70:6 79:6 | +| ammunition 130:9 | 133:10,13 135:11 | argue 30:1 38:2 | aspect 30:24 31:2 | attempting 27:17 | +| amount 44:23 59:8 | appeals 121:12 | 92:21 113:14 | 34:5 43:9,10 | 32:3 54:6 147:6 | +| 91:6 113:19 | 173:5 | argued 29:24 | 96:16 150:11 | 170:5 190:19 | +| 170:18 182:24 | appearance 165:18 | 165:23 | 194:25 226:5 | attempts 153:2 | +| 183:10 225:8 | 219:16 | arguing 12:9 32:5 | aspects 77:10 80:17 | attention 33:11 | +| amply 131:13 | 2:1 | 45:21 57:7 223:3 | 103:3 124:11 | 43:13 115:19 | +| analogize 27:14 | APPEARANCES | argument 15:3 | 164:3 200:2 203:7 | 124:1 171:5 | +| analogous 126:14 | appellate 59:24 | 24:23 31:3,9 | assault 78:5 81:10 | 174:19 188:6 | +| 140:14 | 61:4 91:8 124:14 | 35:10 36:19 47:3 | 116:7 | ATTERBURY 2:12 | +| analogy 27:21 | 173:3 | 49:23 55:20 66:13 | assaulted 71:25 | attitude 234:13 | +| 151:23 | apples 80:1 | 84:23 86:1 93:12 | assaults 69:8 71:11 | attorney 19:19 20:1 | +| analysis 9:10,11 | applicability 51:18 | 93:18 100:10 | 71:22 79:18 | 21:21 38:10 58:20 | +| 29:17 38:4 51:2 | 191:10 | 107:6 115:21 | assembled 91:17 | 85:4 98:4 99:6 | +| 100:6 114:8,10 | applicable 50:13 | 126:21 148:16,18 | 94:20 | 122:8 132:17 | +| 127:21 128:1,23 | 72:4,5 131:21 | 149:21 151:20,21 | assert 40:9 | 172:3 207:18,20 | +| 132:22 141:6,11 | 133:7 151:3 | 152:12,17,19 | asserted 28:9 34:25 | 207:23 208:1 | +| 141:13 144:12 | application 35:25 | 153:3,9,11 154:16 | 147:20 232:16 | 209:9 220:17,17 | +| 153:7 170:9 | 36:1,5 38:13 | 155:3 157:11 | 233:2 234:4 | 224:12 | +| 194:23 | 48:15 52:13 | 158:15 164:22 | assertion 25:1 39:17 | Attorney's 75:19 | +| and/or 167:11 | 129:22 134:16 | 165:16,20 181:9 | 67:1,16 119:4,8 | 98:12 168:18 | +| Andrew 231:11 | 161:8,24 162:5,15 | 181:10 190:8 | 120:20 126:23 | 171:21,23 173:9 | +| anecdotally 111:24 | 234:17 | 198:8 210:10 | 127:18 147:8 | 174:1 196:21 | +| 112:12 | applied 5:4 | 211:21,24 212:3,6 | 163:21 164:3 | attorneys 56:22 | +| anniversary 115:10 | applies 25:8 100:23 | 212:10,25 213:5 | assertions 55:11 | 58:19 80:11 206:9 | + +| 208:11 209:8,8 | banking 204:24 | 29:22 30:5,7 | 20:13 124:2,5 | built 22:23 52:20 | +|----------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 219:10 220:25 | bankruptcy 229:19 | 31:25 37:1 41:4 | 139:2 190:16 | 54:3 113:17 | +| attributable 51:15 | banks 164:5 | 45:23 56:21 65:15 | 208:12 213:10 | built-in 52:3,18 | +| augment 60:6 | bar 15:15,18 48:10 | 86:17,22 107:22 | Brad's 213:15 | bulk 35:13 | +| Australian 2:12 | BARNHART 2:7 | 111:25 136:9,23 | 1:8 32:7 | burden 21:1,8 | +| authenticity 233:14 | barred 27:19 50:12 | 138:9 146:18 | 46:6 65:4,6,14,18 | 118:5 123:16,19 | +| authoritatively | Barry 205:17 | 148:6 155:24 | 67:4,7,15 69:22 | 123:22 142:1,2 | +| 102:21 | based 7:4,15,22 | 158:21 159:9 | 72:2,15 95:8 | 143:20 145:3 | +| authority 8:23 | 11:10 14:24,25 | 164:2 172:23 | 106:24,25 152:22 | burdens 21:11 | +| authorized 29:22 | 17:2 21:3 26:20 | 175:8 176:9 | 155:6,24 156:21 | Burlington 12:10 | +| 30:8 238:8 | 28:3 41:21 45:15 | 177:24 180:7 | 169:19 186:22 | 12:11,12 18:19 | +| automatic 56:18 | 72:22 78:12 | 198:5 223:24 | 190:12,20 191:20 | 20:19,21 28:7 | +| 57:4 | 106:13 173:12 | believed 22:7 | 191:22 207:6,7 | 30:10 33:24 35:10 | +| automatically | 218:16 | Believers.org | branch 22:11,11 | 40:15,19 41:24 | +| 159:15 | baseless 12:23 21:4 | 212:21 | branches 13:10 | 51:10 56:20,23 | +| automobile 118:12 | 207:5 | believes 121:2 223:9 | breadth 219:7 | 57:2 | +| available 7:5 93:8 | bases 65:3 | BellSouth 162:8 | break 54:10 61:12 | Burlington's 47:3 | +| 169:18,21 221:17 | basic 38:14 | Belohiavek 207:19 | 91:12,13 136:2,8 | business 17:7 78:9 | +| Ave 2:12 | basing 62:22 | bench 149:22 | Breakers 204:25 | 226:10 | +| Avenue 2:16 | basis 21:14 30:8 | benefit 234:6 | brevity 148:14 | businesses 59:9 | +| avoid 17:3 50:15 | 37:3 64:16 65:11 | BERARD 2:4 | bridge 44:18 | busy 169:4 | +| 121:17 125:8 | 72:3,14 79:20 | best 56:8 93:6,13 | brief 24:18 51:10 | | +| avoidance 49:25 | 115:20 116:14 | 129:23 170:5 | 112:10 | C-A-D 204:3 | +| 52:8 53:1 54:5 | 117:2 119:4 | 225:11 | briefly 78:18 86:5 | C.W 98:5 102:6 | +| avoided 33:4 109:23 | 121:13 142:20 | better 8:23 56:1 | bright-line 140:11 | CAD 204:3 | +| 124:15 | 145:25 147:13,17 | beyond 39:1,13 | bring 9:24 11:19 | calculated 70:7 72:7 | +| award 25:3 44:22 | 147:25 148:7 | 109:22 201:10 | 17:18 18:24 41:12 | 225:13 | +| aware 58:21 79:19 | 154:23 162:15 | Bible 212:21,23 | 42:24 87:1,8 | call 41:15 110:4,5 | +| 113:2 131:2 | 171:14 172:9 | bicycles 204:24 | 96:25 110:23 | 143:14 145:14 | +| 158:23 206:25 | 190:25 192:11,16 | big 42:10 | 131:8 138:17 | called 17:1 18:19 | +| 220:19 | 192:22 193:1 | Bill 76:9 | 149:22 156:19 | 82:5 92:9 109:17 | +| axiom 129:21 | 194:4 230:7 | billing 227:16 | 174:19 201:11 | 117:1 127:4,8 | +| | battle 121:21 | Billionaire 232:6 | 231:17 | 168:6 169:3 | +| B | Beach 1:2,17,22,23 | binder 122:3 129:7 | bringing 33:11 91:2 | 206:21 | +| B 62:5 150:20 | 1:23 2:3,4,8,8,13 | bit 30:14 68:4 104:9 | 107:11 108:18 | calling 183:6 | +| back 3:2 12:1 15:2 | 95:2,17,22,23,23 | 138:7 141:15 | 123:1 132:17 | calls 204:3 | +| 32:4 56:1,14 | 168:18 171:20 | black 45:20 87:9 | 180:9 185:3 | camera 223:20 | +| 61:15 72:24 74:15 | 173:25 197:24 | blueprint 73:10 | 189:17 193:24 | car 211:11,17 | +| 91:2,16 94:20 | 204:8 205:17 | blur 51:5 | 201:19 | care 96:7 102:11 | +| 114:5 135:17,24 | 206:16 209:25 | board 22:5,6 138:22 | broad 85:16 | 229:15 | +| 140:2 141:16 | 211:14 217:17,19 | boats 195:16 | broadly 49:5 190:7 | carefully 43:2 102:2 | +| 146:7,10,14 174:7 | 218:1,19 231:22 | boiling 35:10 | brought 23:5 27:14 | 182:7 | +| 186:13 236:8 | 238:5 | bold 45:19 | 36:3 48:17 51:16 | carried 123:7 | +| 237:3 | beauty 204:22 | bolster 70:8 | 52:18 76:8 80:15 | carries 210:12 | +| backing 190:22 | befits 83:5 | bona 17:24 226:22 | 227:7 | carry 123:22 | +| backup 55:6 | beginning 45:12 | 227:7 | bono 190:25 | 151:25 | +| backwards 184:21 | begins 213:12 | boon 190:25 | book 156:6 | cars 195:16 | +| 184:21 | begun 116:17 | booking 203:5 | books 156:7,10,10 | carve 170:6 | +| bad 91:2 150:15 | 27:11 33:13 73:17 | bookstore 204:24 | bootstrap 20:2 | carved 90:19 | +| 233:18,18 | 80:16 98:24 134:2 | bootstrap 20:2 | bottom 5:20 68:9 | carve 170:6 | +| badly 129:16 | 154:24 186:21 | bottom 5:20 68:9 | 179:15 | carved 90:19 | +| 233:4 | 187:9 219:3 | Boulevard 1:23 2:3 | 2:8 95:23 | case 1:3 3:22 4:8,8 | +| bait 76:14 | belief 69:4 72:14 | Boulevard 1:23 2:3 | 157:18 170:7 | 4:24 8:24 11:13 | +| balanced 18:23 | 103:21 138:1 | bound 159:12 | 171:5 187:8,12,16 | 13:13 14:3 15:3,8 | +| balancing 114:10 | 173:12 | bounty 156:18 | 188:5 196:24 | 16:9 17:13,14,15 | +| 133:18 | beliefs 71:2 | Brad 12:13 20:10 | 201:13,14 226:24 | 18:5,7,8,15,19 | +| balls 92:7 | believe 4:4 11:6 | | | 19:5,18,21 20:4 | +| bank 162:25 200:1 | 23:10 25:11 26:19 | | | 20:24 21:12,13,19 | + +| 23:2,2,4,19 24:20 | 26:22 27:6 28:17 | celebrities 69:11 | 156:11,13,15,18 | 207:5,7,13 220:21 | +|---------------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------| +| 25:15,18 26:16 | 28:19 34:10,22 | 70:7 71:10 77:5 | 156:19 157:8 | 220:24 227:18,23 | +| 27:15 29:2,14 | 36:9 39:12 40:20 | center 80:14,17 | 166:8,9 232:12,24 | 228:25 229:1,2 | +| 35:25 37:11 41:1 | 40:21 41:19,19 | 187:12 | chilling 88:19 | 234:15 | +| 41:2,3,8,17,25 | 53:13 59:2 71:5,6 | certain 98:15 | choice 110:15 | claimed 69:5 85:18 | +| 42:6 43:19,20 | 73:1 75:4 76:13 | 100:11 103:25 | 114:24 134:14,15 | claiming 48:22 | +| 47:6 48:10,18,19 | 76:14 77:25 80:22 | 117:20 152:2 | choices 132:16 | 113:16 116:10 | +| 49:4,11 52:12,17 | 81:5,7 83:17,22 | 175:12 179:12 | choose 115:4 | 171:14 | +| 53:16 58:24 64:20 | 100:14 103:16 | certainly 14:21 | chooses 203:16 | claims 16:16,21 | +| 66:15 73:10,11,19 | 118:12 121:9,9 | 29:25 35:17 51:4 | chose 134:11 | 17:19 19:8,13 | +| 74:14 75:5,8,12 | 128:4 143:13,15 | 51:8 56:5 58:21 | chosen 132:18 | 24:3,7 29:23 | +| 77:19 78:1 80:4 | 145:1,5,12,12 | 107:21 112:11 | Cingular 162:9 | 32:12,17,22 35:4 | +| 81:14 83:22 87:2 | 147:19 153:8 | 129:22 170:18 | circle 227:25 | 35:20 49:21,23 | +| 87:23 88:1,15,16 | 158:23 159:23 | 234:1 | CIRCUIT 1:1,1 | 50:11,12,13 51:11 | +| 88:16,20,22 95:3 | 174:19 178:5 | CERTIFICATE
238:1 | 95:1,1 | 53:15 54:24 71:17 | +| 96:16,23 97:14 | 183:15 184:13,25 | certified 18:2 | circulating 124:4 | 72:16 78:5 80:12 | +| 98:1,7 99:10,21 | 185:3,4,7,12 | 179:19 | circumstance 90:9 | 80:15,19 82:20 | +| 102:6 103:13,17 | 188:22 189:7,13 | certify 238:7 | 93:15 118:19 | 83:3 85:15 101:11 | +| 106:9,16,19 107:1 | 189:13 190:15 | cetera 177:14 | 227:8 | 106:11 109:24 | +| 109:12,15,16 | 191:21 192:10,19 | challenge 24:9 | circumstances
117:20 126:15,25 | 116:12 117:2,8,8 | +| 110:9,10,12 111:3 | 196:2 198:24 | 120:20 182:23 | 130:11 169:14 | 122:19 123:4 | +| 111:8,18 112:2 | 207:2 209:2 | 183:1 | 178:15 | 134:1 138:25 | +| 113:11 114:6,17 | 210:15 213:10 | challenges 24:11 | citations 135:2 | 139:1,3,9 140:12 | +| 114:22 116:1,3 | 230:10 | challenging 28:10 | cite 4:22 13:7 16:25 | 140:12 144:14 | +| 117:6 118:14 | cassell 191:2 | 185:3 207:2 | 18:17 21:12 | 147:5,9,24 154:13 | +| 119:11,13,14 | catch-all 218:23 | chance 56:7 | 18:17 21:12 | 154:23 155:12,25 | +| 120:3,24 121:7,16 | categorical 15:22 | change 26:18 60:7 | cited 5:25 13:3 18:5 | 157:3 158:2,3,6 | +| 123:6 124:8,12 | 9:23 16:13 17:2 | change 24:9 | 18:16 19:5 20:24 | 159:22 160:3 | +| 125:3,4,13,14,19 | 22:24 23:4 25:18 | 174:20 213:9 | 23:6 26:16 28:18 | 169:2,5 170:7 | +| 125:20 126:10,25 | 26:12 27:14,17 | changed 45:24 | 28:19 29:2 59:6 | 178:18 192:6 | +| 127:2,4,7,16,22 | 29:21 30:7 31:13 | changes 209:19 | 135:4,8 213:12 | 206:19,20,21 | +| 128:16 129:10,16 | 31:18,21 34:11 | changing 21:10 | citing 127:7 135:3 | 208:11 220:18 | +| 129:20 130:17 | 40:24 41:6,21 | character 150:16 | civil 5:21 16:7 19:23 | 229:18 230:11,14 | +| 131:5 132:8,19,25 | 42:16 43:6,11 | character 23:18 | 42:4,8,21 54:23 | 230:18 234:4 | +| 133:8 134:10 | 45:9,12,22 46:3,4 | characterizing
50:17 | 75:17 81:9 87:1 | clarification 85:10 | +| 136:12 137:4 | 46:7,9,12,14 61:7 | charge 118:16 | 112:20 117:21 | 85:24 | +| 138:19 139:21 | 67:15 74:23 80:8 | charge 177:2 | 119:13,14 131:20 | clarify 86:14 99:20 | +| 140:4 141:22 | 90:16,25 91:1 | charges 32:8 101:12 | 137:17,25 138:25 | 181:20 184:22 | +| 142:9 143:7,21 | cause 1:19 6:7,12,14 | charges 50:22 | 152:23,24 179:16 | clarity 5:19 | +| 144:3 145:18,22 | 139:14,18 140:1 | charges 3:2 101:12 | 188:22 191:4,24 | cleaning 204:24 | +| 146:9 147:20 | 143:1 145:20 | 102:25 103:4 | 192:19 | clear 3:23 4:9 5:1 | +| 150:13,21 151:4,8 | 146:4 151:5,11 | chase 149:6 | claim 6:15,23 7:5,22 | 16:1 19:19 21:21 | +| 153:13 154:2 | 152:15 153:13 | check 215:25 | 12:15 15:12,16 | 25:4 49:19 83:1 | +| 158:22 167:14 | 155:14,24 170:2 | checked 177:1 | 16:4,23 20:10 | 83:25 101:6 106:7 | +| 171:16 172:12 | 172:25 173:7,11 | cherrypicking
146:2 | 25:9 26:2,4 32:7 | 140:3 169:16 | +| 173:20 174:4,14 | 173:16 185:1 | chief 205:16 206:25 | 32:25 34:3,5,14 | 183:12 184:3,16 | +| 177:2 180:12,13 | 191:8 194:4 | chief 207:1 209:18 | 45:2,16,18 48:15 | clearly 4:2 11:20 | +| 185:15 186:11 | 195:19,22 209:23 | 210:1 | 48:16 50:10,21,23 | 12:22 15:9,21 | +| 189:9,10,25 | cause/malicious
145:17 | child 11:16 66:16 | 66:8 71:13 80:10 | 19:9 30:6 33:25 | +| 203:7 206:1 | caused 8:15 26:14 | chief's 206:19 | 80:18 81:9,9 87:8 | 36:18 72:9 75:8 | +| 209:23 213:24 | 44:11 45:2,16 | child 11:16 66:16 | 107:25 108:3,13 | 118:18,18 121:4 | +| 214:3 215:10,11 | 46:6 83:23 89:3 | 150:22 156:23 | 108:18 115:7 | 121:22 148:22 | +| 219:16 220:8,10 | causing 7:15 | 178:21 179:7,8,13 | 116:14 121:2,20 | 166:10 178:3,8,16 | +| 221:16,24 222:9 | caution 155:20 | 180:8 233:4 | 123:10 131:7 | 190:9 223:13 | +| 224:12,14 229:6 | cautiously 99:7 | children 66:5,9,20 | 132:19 133:25 | 234:12 | +| cases 13:8,9 16:25 | caveat 61:3 161:18 | 66:23 71:24 79:1 | 134:5 140:7,20 | clerked 173:4 | +| 17:10 18:9,16,17 | 225:19 | 79:18 120:19 | 149:4 165:2 | client 15:1 19:20 | +| 20:14 23:7 25:14 | | | 180:16 191:25 | 20:1 21:22 26:10 | + +| 27:12 37:15 38:11 | 234:19 235:6 | 43:17 44:3 47:8 | 198:23 208:24 | 178:4 180:20 | +|----------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 38:21 39:6,14,22 | comfort 60:25 | 47:22 67:19,20,24 | 211:2 234:2 | 215:17 225:2,8 | +| 73:6 74:12,20,23 | 103:10 105:13 | 68:12,23 71:21 | conclude 43:13 | considerations | +| 74:24 75:14 76:11 | 138:16 | 72:14 74:3 82:21 | 178:10 | 13:16 | +| 82:4 99:15 119:23 | comfortable 59:14 | 84:4,14,25 85:13 | concluded 14:13 | considered 221:4 | +| 146:21 151:13 | 102:24 166:14 | 87:21 107:12 | 65:4 237:6 | considering 13:1 | +| 153:25 163:10 | coming 43:5 59:7 | 109:21 115:6,22 | concludes 25:11 | 113:4 | +| 167:3 171:18,19 | 107:7,8 111:22 | 129:4 136:20 | conclusion 15:10 | consistent 61:3 | +| 171:22 173:8,10 | 148:23 | 137:6 139:4,6,7 | 67:4 119:10 | 219:6 | +| 174:2 193:23 | commenced 16:9 | 139:13,15,22 | 145:20 155:10 | conspiracy 17:18 | +| 199:12 207:23 | 42:23 74:13 | 142:4 145:23 | 166:3 | constitute 34:13 | +| 211:13 220:16 | commencement | 146:3 162:21 | conclusive 120:2 | 50:1 51:17 52:8 | +| 224:11,19 226:23 | 5:25 7:11,16 | 184:4,8 206:22 | conclusively 117:9 | 53:4 85:17 | +| 233:18,22 | commences 87:11 | complaints 156:21 | 124:7 | constituted 28:4 | +| client's 64:18,23 | comment 86:4 | 177:22 186:21 | concrete 190:3 | Constitution 49:16 | +| 74:3 76:24 77:6 | 102:18 115:15 | 192:23 | concurrent 117:23 | 49:17 52:14,16 | +| 82:3 146:17 161:2 | 134:13 176:4 | complete 75:2 | 118:10,11 | constitutional 10:20 | +| 161:25 167:16 | 206:16 210:8 | completed 228:16 | concurring 22:21 | 24:9,11 52:20 | +| clients 20:17 37:16 | commentary 83:6 | completely 14:13 | condemnation | constitutionally | +| 64:23 65:24 70:24 | comments 155:5 | 36:5 49:9 53:14 | 77:24 | 117:24 | +| 71:13,18 76:20 | 177:9 222:24 | 64:24 75:12 96:12 | conditions 177:10 | constructive 174:8 | +| 77:12 80:16 134:2 | commission 66:17 | 97:11 129:1 | conduct 21:17 | constructively 78:3 | +| 167:4 179:3 | 212:17 | compliance 208:2 | 33:18 67:16 70:15 | 131:2 154:12 | +| close 194:21 | commit 7:2,3 | complication 128:6 | 72:3 79:20 80:23 | construed 35:19 | +| close-out 214:22 | 120:15 234:14 | complies 98:16 | 155:7 157:17,21 | 51:6 119:14 130:8 | +| closely 33:21 195:4 | committing 99:14 | comply 101:22 | 183:18 | contact 157:18 | +| 196:22 | common-sense | component 137:18 | conducted 217:14 | 177:14 201:22 | +| club 145:13 | 37:17 | 137:22,24 156:4 | confession 49:24 | contacting 39:25 | +| co-counsel 93:17 | commonly 79:14 | 206:1 | 52:8,25 54:4 | contacts 204:12 | +| co-exist 108:21 | community 20:8 | comprehend 31:9 | confidence 112:9 | contained 99:23 | +| coalesce 108:21 | 201:25 | comprise 222:10 | 230:8 | containing 69:10 | +| code 150:8,19 151:1 | companies 69:15 | comprises 226:6 | confined 88:16 | contemplate 84:9 | +| 151:2 | 205:2 | compromising | confirm 60:7 | contemplated 87:11 | +| cogent 179:24 | company 200:7 | 190:21 | confirmed 78:25 | contend 46:2 | +| coin 144:9 | compared 143:16 | concealed 116:16 | confirming 54:7 | 165:24,24 232:23 | +| colloquy 175:7 | compares 232:11 | concede 58:1 | confusing 31:3 | contending 227:6 | +| 179:1,4 200:19,23 | compel 94:10 | conceded 25:20 | 209:15 | contention 154:18 | +| colorable 24:23 | 163:18 164:1 | 54:3 76:23 83:9 | confusion 136:17 | contents 199:2 | +| column 180:1 | 230:22 235:25 | concedes 75:24 | 225:1 233:13 | contested 60:5 | +| combination 133:12 | compelling 128:23 | 76:21 | congratulate 114:2 | 143:13 | +| come 12:1 24:22 | 132:3 | conceding 33:2,2 | conjunction 136:14 | context 3:18 22:13 | +| 29:8 37:10 43:7 | compensate 44:25 | conceivable 83:12 | 136:16 | 23:3 24:6,15 25:3 | +| 44:18 61:15 104:6 | compensatory | 159:3 | conjuring 87:6 | 56:10 60:12,20 | +| 114:21 117:15 | 26:14 | conceivably 35:19 | connected 89:19,23 | 61:7 79:5 131:20 | +| 141:12 145:4,9,15 | competing 159:22 | conceive 36:2 | 89:25 90:8 194:2 | 161:20 162:3 | +| 169:6 184:7 185:6 | compilation 170:11 | concern 14:22 21:7 | connecting 138:3 | 163:20 172:5 | +| 199:23 201:7 | 224:17 | 21:15,18 22:2,14 | connection 37:25 | 193:18 228:2 | +| 208:5 226:1 | compiled 98:18 | 88:18 108:22 | 68:21 173:13 | 234:18 | +| 227:21 | 226:8 | 158:1 180:15,17 | 193:10 229:22 | continuation 45:4 | +| comedy 204:25 | complain 185:4 | 234:18 | consent 78:4 | 45:18,22 46:5,15 | +| comes 6:3 17:11 | complained 45:5 | concerned 34:16 | consequences | 55:21 89:5 140:20 | +| 43:12 56:9 60:5 | complaint 3:25 4:5 | 48:8 52:1,9 78:1 | 132:15 133:21 | continue 43:8 46:4 | +| 79:6 100:19 | 5:9 6:6,25 7:2,19 | 84:17 92:1 128:13 | conserving 57:5 | 46:13 82:18 96:1 | +| 101:10 143:20 | 7:22 8:15,20 9:3 | 132:23 168:5 | consider 44:21 | 102:23 105:15 | +| 145:24 154:17 | 9:25 10:12 25:10 | 170:3 172:14 | 99:12 122:18 | 180:17 | +| 180:16 191:11,13 | 26:7 31:12,13,18 | 174:12 | 155:8,18 226:19 | continued 16:9,10 | +| 203:3,3 225:3 | 31:19 37:5 40:23 | concerning 97:5 | consideration 85:15 | 42:23 43:1,4 46:9 | +| 229:20,23 230:3 | 41:20 42:9,25 | 98:1 102:9 106:20 | 129:8 145:24 | 46:18 87:13 91:24 | + +| continues 68:8 | 132:20 138:8,21 | 69:23 70:16 72:17 | 182:4 183:22 | 76:3 108:22 | +|----------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------| +| continuing 90:15 | 155:16 207:18 | 72:20 73:4,12 | 185:24 187:1,7,25 | created 17:18 | +| 228:21 | 216:17 | 74:22 75:2,6 77:7 | 188:4,10,14,16,25 | creating 189:18 | +| Contract 211:15 | count 11:9 19:4 | 77:14,22 78:18 | 189:4,11,20 190:9 | creativity 35:7 | +| contractor 199:11 | 21:1 42:9 177:3 | 79:3,12,24 81:2 | 192:14 193:17 | credibility 141:2 | +| contractual 230:8 | 179:5 | 81:17,23 82:17,23 | 194:17 196:12 | 175:22 195:12 | +| contradicts 72:13 | counter- 110:5 | 82:24 84:1,5,16 | 197:9,10,14,21 | credit 177:8 | +| contrary 18:16 50:3 | 110:6 | 85:1,11,21 86:3,6 | 198:4,8,13,19 | crime 75:6 97:14,22 | +| 53:9 | | 86:7,12 87:3,23 | 199:7,14,15,19,21 | 97:23 108:13 | +| Contrast 44:13 | counter-plaintiff | 88:1,1,13 89:8 | 199:22 200:9,13 | 119:10,15 120:2 | +| contributing 155:9 | 3:22 36:4 107:1 | 90:20,23 91:2,9 | 200:16 201:20 | 120:23 133:8 | +| contributions | | 91:12 92:14 93:2 | 202:3,6 203:2,10 | 150:22 175:18 | +| 231:21 | 138:8 | 93:20 95:1 96:1,6 | 203:13,18,22 | 190:23 219:2 | +| control 25:19,21 | counter-pleading | 96:12,22 97:8,16 | 204:2,5,9,16,20 | 220:7 221:15 | +| 201:25 208:13,16 | 14:17 | 97:17 99:20 100:5 | 205:22 206:4 | 222:8 226:5 | +| controversy 187:12 | counts 18:1,2 | 100:7 102:12,22 | 207:8,14 209:5,13 | crimes 37:21 120:7 | +| convenience 103:6 | 104:22 | 103:8,17 104:5,18 | 209:15 210:2,11 | 120:9,15 150:14 | +| convert 18:6 19:3 | County 1:2 95:2 | 104:24 105:1,4,5 | 210:25 211:4,18 | 156:16 175:12 | +| 19:24,25 21:24 | 171:20 173:25 | 105:6,21 106:7 | 211:22,25 212:4,7 | 176:8 | +| converted 20:8 | 238:5 | 107:5,9 108:23 | 212:11,12,23 | criminal 5:21 6:3,4 | +| convicted 17:21 | couple 30:15,23 | 109:20 111:2,11 | 213:1,22 214:2,8 | 6:6 16:7 21:17,20 | +| 37:21 175:17 | 33:9 40:14 58:16 | 111:23 112:1,8 | 214:15,21 215:8 | 42:21 81:8 97:5 | +| 179:11 203:21 | 92:7 115:3 138:11 | 113:2,3,14 114:13 | 215:13,21 216:7 | 98:14 99:2,6 | +| conviction 175:3,7 | course 9:17 43:12 | 115:2,12,19 | 217:1,4,9,23 | 100:24 101:1,4 | +| 175:12 176:12 | 74:1 128:15 | 117:15,21 118:9 | 218:17 219:13,19 | 102:25 103:4,15 | +| convictions 218:4 | 163:25 169:16 | 118:17 119:12,19 | 220:11 222:2,21 | 109:11 117:23 | +| convincing 49:19 | court 1:1 3:1,7,12 | 122:2,21 124:21 | 222:25 223:11 | 118:11 120:6 | +| coordinated 192:11 | 4:7,8,9,13,14,15 | 125:15 126:5,11 | 225:6,15,25 | 121:7,8,22,25 | +| copies 68:6 69:9 | 4:17,18,21,22,25 | 126:24 127:10,13 | 226:16 227:1,14 | 131:15 150:12,21 | +| 167:19 198:11 | 5:2,7,13,14,17,19 | 127:25 128:23 | 227:21 228:3,9 | 151:6 152:18 | +| 218:3 | 5:23 6:9 7:1,9,9 | 132:7,14,25 133:5 | 229:12 230:21,24 | 153:18 154:2 | +| copy 62:19,24 | 7:24 8:22 10:10 | 133:16,19,23 | 231:14,16,17 | 157:19 167:12,13 | +| 104:22 153:21 | 10:10,14,19 11:1 | 134:8,18 135:9,10 | 232:2,14,15 233:5 | 168:18,25 169:7 | +| 176:12 179:19 | 11:4,9,20 12:8,12 | 135:11,16,19,24 | 233:23 234:16 | 169:17,17 171:16 | +| 193:11 204:6 | 12:22 14:6,15,11 | 136:3,7,14,21 | 235:5,11,11,17,21 | 171:21 172:1,2,5 | +| 214:5 | 15:17 16:19 18:17 | 137:1,4 140:9,16 | 236:16 237:2 | 172:12,19 173:2,4 | +| corner 205:1 | 18:20 20:2,18,20 | 141:9,20 143:17 | 238:1 | 173:24,24 174:1,5 | +| cornerstones 99:4 | 22:12 23:14 24:5 | 143:23 146:5,14 | Court's 51:22 54:8 | 175:7 177:22 | +| corporations | 24:10 25:16 27:2 | 146:19,24 148:19 | 78:11,20 80:2 | 179:17 184:17 | +| 164:25 | 29:8,11 30:10,15 | 149:1,18,24 | 100:17 105:23 | 191:6 201:23 | +| correct 4:20 28:7 | 30:18,25 31:7 | 151:15,18,21 | 114:20 115:16 | 203:7 208:18 | +| 32:18 59:20 61:24 | 32:12,15,18,21 | 152:14,19 153:4 | 127:16 131:1 | 211:2 214:22 | +| 62:8 119:15 122:4 | 33:8,20,25 37:12 | 153:21 154:3,11 | 132:22,25 135:5 | 218:13 219:4 | +| 126:1 149:16,17 | 38:7,18 39:18 | 154:15 157:12 | 141:7,10,13 | critical 13:15 100:5 | +| 176:13 205:20 | 40:11 41:9,25 | 158:17,19 160:15 | 143:25 158:1 | 107:9 131:15,19 | +| 217:3 | 42:2,6,20 43:3,3 | 161:7,17 162:18 | 188:6 215:17 | 134:17 135:3 | +| correctly 91:9 | 44:17 45:18,25 | 162:22 163:13 | 221:19 223:2 | 153:7 | +| corresponding | 46:19,24 47:5,10 | 164:10,13,23 | 228:2 | criticism 115:16 | +| 118:13 | 47:25 48:2,3,7,12 | 165:4,16 166:14 | courthouse 201:16 | criticize 134:13 | +| corroborated | 49:3 50:6,18 51:3 | 166:19,21,24 | courtroom 77:25 | criticized 135:10 | +| 161:16 | 51:8 52:9 53:2,6 | 167:5,18,25 | 83:5 89:16,25 | crystal 19:18 | +| corroborative | 53:18,22 54:12 | 168:21 170:3 | 90:10 184:2 | cull 224:20 225:12 | +| 207:11 | 55:1,15,20 56:5 | 171:1,13 172:13 | 185:25 201:14 | culled 220:1 221:6 | +| costly 124:14 | 57:14 58:16 60:3 | 172:21 173:5,19 | courts 15:14 59:24 | 223:21 224:10 | +| counsel 9:12 10:6 | 61:1,8,14,20,25 | 173:22 174:6,12 | 61:5 114:18 | 228:11 | +| 10:16 53:19 55:3 | 62:16 63:2,7,10 | 174:25 175:21 | 117:19 131:15 | culpable 166:1 | +| 57:13 60:15 70:17 | 63:17,21 64:1,4,7 | 176:23 177:16 | covered 97:6 164:5 | custodian 162:8 | +| 94:6 105:7 122:24 | 65:1 66:14 67:22 | 179:9 180:7,11,15 | covers 120:12 | cutting 135:21 | +| 129:9,20 130:25 | 68:1,3,16 69:1,17 | 181:3,11,15 182:2 | create 25:23 39:3 | CVRA 97:3,7,14,21 | + +| 98:1 106:9 111:8
111:18 125:14
215:11 220:18 | D
D 1:22 95:22 238:7
238:16
D-E-B-R-I-N-C-...
4:19
D3 69:9,13
daily 147:13
damage 19:3 34:14
42:12 44:1,11
45:1 46:6 83:23
108:8 165:2
205:14
damaged 113:9,10
damages 8:16 18:12
18:13 23:19 24:7
24:15 25:3 26:15
34:3,7,12,16,19
37:3 40:25 41:7,8
41:23 44:8,16,19
44:21 45:22 47:8
47:9 49:19 51:11
51:17 52:6,17
53:21 89:3 163:7
182:24 185:19
193:19 194:25
195:5 202:23,25
205:25 227:22
232:22 234:15
danger 81:3 82:7
233:12
DARREN 2:16,17
data 69:25
date 1:16 92:12
95:16 132:8
dated 158:20
205:21 209:12
212:9 213:2 216:1
216:2 238:13
Daubert 58:25 59:2
59:3
daughter-in-law
92:12
DAVID 2:9
day 46:16,17 82:5
85:3 112:14
114:12 137:7
144:13 147:14
184:2 224:2 237:2
238:13
days 96:10 116:3
216:10 219:9
221:7,9 224:19
225:22,23 226:4,9
226:10,14
DCA 5:24 90:21,22 | dead 15:5 16:2
178:20
deal 35:14 84:19
86:2 126:7,20
159:5 162:23
165:4 181:9
200:21 224:1
231:4 232:4
235:15
dealing 4:8 10:21
54:14 60:1 88:17
107:19 134:24
189:23 208:12
221:5 223:14,15
deals 36:21
dealt 230:25
Debbie 175:9
Debrincat 4:18 8:23
9:9 15:3,4 16:5,17
16:22 18:22 25:6
25:11,17,19,23
26:17,22 73:10,11
73:21 88:3,15
December 1:16
87:21 95:16 115:8
115:22 129:12,17
129:18 132:8
172:21 238:13
decide 41:14 74:10
126:18 142:15,24
decided 90:21
133:11
decision 16:18
36:25 37:18 41:12
41:16 47:13,20
50:5,7 53:12 60:7
60:8,21 61:8
86:24 91:9 109:18
127:10 135:5
137:20,25 140:16
140:22 142:10,22
143:4,6 179:24
decision-making
144:7
decisional 52:19
decisions 108:11
174:21 191:21,22
declined 227:12
Dee 187:11
Deeds 164:10,11
deeper 19:7
defamation 3:20 7:3
8:16 9:7,15 10:18
10:24 12:19 16:23
17:4 18:1,4,8,9
19:4,8,8 20:25
22:18 23:21 26:2
26:4 35:1,4,14,16
35:18,20 44:13 | 50:10,12,13,16,21
50:22 51:7,19,24
53:16 75:7,10
86:21 107:25
108:3 134:4 140:4
140:4,8,12 173:15
defamatory 9:17
17:3 22:17 37:2
73:25 193:20
defaming 8:6,7,11
8:15,20 9:1
defaming-words
12:5
defend 10:15 26:10
32:6 110:10,11
114:5,16 116:23
116:24 125:3,4
182:22 227:12
defendant 2:2 7:11
23:15 32:24 42:15
44:20 87:13
150:21 192:24
220:23
Defendant/Count...
2:6
defendants 110:9
130:5
Defendants/Count...
1:9 95:9
defended 130:23
defending 10:9
110:8 147:7
defense 10:7 12:17
12:18,20 21:5
23:13,18,20,22
24:2,3,8,12 25:5
34:4,14 35:23
36:20,21 37:11
43:5 48:8,22 49:3
49:12 50:1,8
51:20,25 52:22
54:1 56:25 57:17
67:9 68:6 80:9
83:14 99:6 101:1
109:15,16 117:17
123:22 129:23
165:22 166:5
172:4,19 221:14
228:24 229:2,5
defenses 3:5,17,20
7:21 9:6,21 10:2,4
10:8,18,20 13:4
13:14 14:1,4,11
14:14 17:4 18:8
19:9 21:2 23:8,11
23:12,25 26:5
27:8,24 28:5,8,16
29:3 34:25 35:3
35:13 40:18 48:6 | 49:8 50:9,13,14
50:15 53:3,5,7
75:10 188:21
192:19
defer 153:4 179:22
180:19 193:2
200:2 204:2 214:8
229:24
deferred 181:12
186:8 232:2
deferring 166:15
167:1
defined 18:21 43:2
69:22 83:20
definition 173:20
definitive 218:9
defrauded 69:15
200:8
degree 123:21 177:4
177:5 208:13,16
228:11 230:15
delay 100:9 123:15
123:17 124:11
133:2
delaying 121:19
delight 61:5
deliver 131:9
Deliveries 204:18
delivery 204:23
demonstrate 8:14
31:20 40:24
139:16 147:4
denial 14:19 49:24
56:25
denied 126:12 135:8
186:10
denies 134:19
DENNEY 2:7
Dennison 197:3
Dennison's 197:3
deny 13:21 26:20
76:22 124:18
denying 75:9 201:4
department 197:24
204:8 205:17
206:17 209:25,25
218:1,19 231:22
depending 153:1
188:19 189:20,22
depends 45:6 179:9
depicting 231:10
deposed 70:17,20
deposing 214:1
deposition 7:25 8:1
18:10 43:18 51:3
67:7,25 68:19
70:19 75:25 83:15
104:1 113:25
157:9 163:25 | 203:17 213:23
215:20 218:20
228:6 229:22
234:1
depositions 66:25
70:6 71:5 147:18
208:20
deprived 24:16
Dershowitz 214:1
Dershowitz's 213:2
213:23
describe 93:7
described 191:8
197:2 210:19
221:22 225:19
description 161:5
descriptions 161:13
designated 68:6
designation 177:11
177:18 197:17
designed 11:5 18:22
114:18
desire 132:1
despite 19:20
125:17,18 159:24
224:13
detail 51:1 53:8
135:2
detailed 135:13
161:13
Detective 218:20
determination 15:6
42:18 57:21 58:8
74:18 127:17
137:10 143:25
144:17 169:25
178:17 230:13
determine 6:21
74:22 142:14
146:4 186:6
192:17
determined 142:25
determining 113:4
developed 121:10
179:24
develops 231:17
devoted 228:24
devoting 229:2
difference 29:18
38:19 192:12
different 26:7 29:5
29:5,6 44:15
47:16 84:20 89:6
89:11 108:24
141:24 160:7
162:2 200:17
205:1 207:20
213:7 216:3
differently 141:23 | +|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +| difficult 68:5 157:16 | 220:7 | 225:12 228:10 | 195:21 197:2 | 219:3 225:10 | +|-----------------------|----------------------------|---------------------|-------------------|---------------------| +| difficulty 206:14 | discussions 100:13 | 230:7 | 200:20 202:8 | 226:25 233:16 | +| digest 60:11 | dishonesty 175:18 | Doe 70:22 83:3 98:5 | 204:11 205:6,8 | 7:25 11:9 | +| dignitaries 69:11 | dismissal 107:17 | 102:7,14 105:16 | 209:6 210:5,21 | 33:16 48:13 50:11 | +| dignity 83:5 | 227:9 | 128:5 154:8 158:3 | 211:1 214:10,23 | 50:24 53:18 56:4 | +| diligence 168:5 | dismissed 117:5 | 158:4 165:9 | 216:23 219:5,22 | 62:10 67:15 73:17 | +| 195:25 205:9 | 226:23 229:1 | 186:22 215:9 | 231:9 | 77:11 80:6,22 | +| direct 232:9 | dismisses 11:9 | doing 7:20 36:6 | early 125:11,13 | 138:21 155:7 | +| directed 69:1 | dispel 144:14 | 39:24 65:16 66:22 | easily 87:17 | 156:21 179:3 | +| 213:16 | disposition 120:9 | 82:16 85:22 97:20 | easy 39:5 | 191:20,22 195:25 | +| directing 229:12 | 124:2 | 99:7 110:24 114:1 | eaten 224:1 | 205:9 209:2 | +| directly 48:20 50:4 | disproportionate 123:21 | 114:20 120:18 | Edward's 62:25 | 226:15 227:18 | +| 72:13 81:15 | disprove 175:24 | 135:11 157:13,13 | 119:23 | 228:24 | +| 179:16 192:3 | dispute 41:11 74:19 | 167:11 171:25 | 1:8 8:9 | Edwards's 216:17 | +| directs 229:9 | 90:4 | 185:11 191:17 | 12:10,13 19:13 | effect 52:11 88:19 | +| disagree 60:9 | | 206:14 223:8,10 | 20:11,13 31:10 | efficient 58:23 | +| disagreement 86:15 | disputed 142:10,12 | Dollar 211:17 | 32:7,13,16,23 | effort 27:23 67:3 | +| 138:7 159:24 | 144:19,22 | Donald 1:18 95:18 | 33:14 34:6,20 | 70:7 190:14 | +| 183:25 | disregard 49:22 | donation 196:4 | 37:6,23 38:3,25 | efforts 13:9 | +| disallowing 59:3 | dissemination 8:6 | door 11:24 167:2 | 39:11 46:7 49:6 | eight 14:4,9 113:22 | +| disclose 117:1 | dissolving 75:21 | dots 138:3 | 49:18,21 50:20 | 219:21 226:6 | +| 202:15 | distance 17:12 | dovetail 129:1 | 51:13 52:2 53:20 | eight-year 224:24 | +| disclosed 164:8 | distinct 172:17 | Dr 8:2 194:8 197:3 | 54:8,25 64:22 | Eighteen 162:20 | +| disclosure 85:14 | distinction 34:23 | draft 182:8,10 | 65:4,7,14,18 67:4 | eighth 23:11,20 | +| 207:22 | 39:21 40:5,10 | 193:15 | 67:8 68:20 69:22 | 50:8 129:14 | +| disclosures 164:5 | 51:23 159:11 | draw 40:10 141:3 | 70:14,17,20,21,25 | Eighty-nine 215:4 | +| 202:21 | 169:14 187:15 | 151:23 163:22 | 72:3,15 75:21,23 | Eighty-six 214:21 | +| disconnect 138:23 | distinguish 159:6 | 166:3 | 76:2,4,15,21,21 | Eighty-two 212:16 | +| discover 149:7 | 170:6 | drawn 178:12 | 76:23 77:18 78:8 | either 21:1,24 23:3 | +| 154:22 | distinguished 175:25 | draws 47:17 | 78:21 79:19 80:16 | 25:25 28:2 41:21 | +| discovered 69:6 | distress 17:6 | dream 14:10 | 83:20 84:8 89:4 | 48:20 53:9 60:6 | +| discovery 14:13,16 | distress 17:6 | driving 118:15 | 89:18,23 95:8 | 68:1 77:24 78:3 | +| 65:6,11,14,20 | district 15:14 17:13 | drunk 118:15 | 98:4,24 100:19 | 81:14 92:20 | +| 67:3,16,17 70:15 | 98:13 120:10,16 | due 24:6,16,21 25:2 | 104:14 106:24,25 | 119:20 133:3 | +| 72:4,7 77:10,20 | 121:24 127:6 | 52:16,18 92:12 | 107:15,23 108:9 | 138:24 142:25 | +| 78:10,22 79:21 | 135:11 173:5 | 94:13 99:5 128:7 | 108:12,17 109:6 | 143:24 166:6,7 | +| 148:2 149:3,8 | division 5:24 189:9 | DUI-type 118:17 | 109:12 111:5,17 | 187:11 189:3 | +| 152:25 163:10,11 | Dixie 1:17 95:17 | duplicate 220:9 | 111:19 113:9,16 | 190:20 | +| 168:5 171:15 | DNA 177:12 | 221:23 | 113:24 114:12 | elaborate 83:18 | +| 172:11 189:17,21 | docket 222:7,10 | duplication 215:23 | 116:5,15 117:3 | element 6:13 15:19 | +| 213:12,16 227:17 | 224:23 | 215:24 | 122:11,20 123:10 | 16:6 25:8 26:13 | +| discretion 29:9 | document 63:6 87:9 | duplicative 203:22 | 124:2,5 128:6 | 34:2,16 42:3,4,7 | +| discuss 56:15 96:21 | 162:2 204:17 | DVD 200:19 | 130:5 133:2,24 | 42:17,18 144:6 | +| 160:1 235:7 | 211:12 212:20,22 | | 134:2,17 139:11 | elements 5:4,13,14 | +| discussed 29:14 | | | 139:15 144:13,25 | 5:17,18 8:17 12:4 | +| 41:19 74:15 79:4 | documentation 168:10 225:9 | | 145:4 147:17 | 15:21 16:11 18:21 | +| 113:5 128:21 | 227:16 | E.W 70:22 83:3 | 149:5 152:22 | 19:3 25:24 26:3 | +| 151:1 164:18 | documented 224:6 | 102:14 104:2 | 154:9,19 155:10 | 43:22,23 100:7 | +| 168:7,9,23 169:11 | 224:7 | 128:5 154:8 157:9 | 155:25 159:18 | 130:19 143:21 | +| 175:14 205:8 | documents 104:25 | 158:2,4 180:8 | 160:2 161:24 | 213:11 | +| 215:14,15 216:22 | documents 104:25 | 186:21 | 167:4 168:4,25 | elevator 110:7 | +| discussing 235:8 | 160:3,19 173:10 | E.W.'s 180:13 | 169:19 170:12,16 | eliminated 17:25 | +| discussion 41:7 | 175:2,5,20 196:3 | earlier 50:3 59:22 | 173:13 180:3 | 46:16 | +| 62:22 91:11 96:2 | 201:24 205:13 | 66:13 79:5 92:17 | 182:12 183:20 | Elmo 72:19 127:24 | +| 135:23 154:4 | 208:7 211:4 212:1 | 117:25 128:24 | 184:25 186:22 | emails 200:4,12 | +| 159:6 160:16 | 212:14 218:18 | 129:6 130:2 | 187:9 190:12,20 | 217:16 | +| 163:17 175:22 | 219:8,23 220:22 | 133:24 150:9 | 190:24 194:2 | emotional 17:6 | +| 176:6 209:14 | 221:2 223:20,21 | 166:17 168:2 | 198:22 207:6,7 | 185:18 | +| | 223:23,25 224:20 | 176:5 190:8 | 208:13 213:10 | empathy 128:14 | + +| emphasize 81:12 | 120:8 121:5,17 | 232:24 233:4 | 141:25 152:4 | 71:17 | +|----------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------| +| emphasized 33:24 | 122:8,24 125:2,22 | equivocating | 164:4 233:15 | exists 33:6 58:9 | +| 132:21 134:8 | 125:24 126:14 | 181:21,23 | examples 39:5 | 148:7 | +| employ 205:10 | 129:4,9,9,19 | equivocation 169:4 | 62:13 85:18 134:3 | exonerating 124:2 | +| employed 213:10 | 130:25 132:20 | 182:5 | excellent 94:14 | expanded 65:9 | +| employment 151:24 | 133:25 134:3,11 | error 209:15 | excepted 73:24 | expect 93:10 211:10 | +| 152:3,5 213:15 | 138:6,9 140:18 | escape 191:3,5 | exception 4:10,11 | 220:23 | +| encloses 209:23 | 144:15 147:3,19 | especially 28:13 | 90:14,14 195:7 | expected 100:7 | +| encountered 113:20 | 149:4 153:2,19 | espoused 50:4 | 234:10 | expecting 93:11 | +| ended 128:9 | 154:18 155:8,22 | ESQUIRE 2:4,5,9,9 | exceptional 91:7 | expeditious 60:18 | +| ends 101:24 | 156:1,8 157:23,25 | 2:13,17 | excerpts 67:11 | expend 26:10 | +| enforcement 156:16 | 158:5 159:7 165:1 | essence 35:11 | 215:20 | experience 94:13 | +| 196:5 217:14 | 165:19 169:22,24 | 168:15 | excess 163:12 | 101:10 128:12 | +| engage 12:24 | 170:19,20 171:15 | essential 35:9 | excessive 168:11 | experienced 123:17 | +| engaged 65:14 | 172:10 176:7,17 | essentially 17:17 | excuse 19:11 20:19 | expert 7:25 8:4,14 | +| 172:2 | 177:25 180:9,10 | 23:15 27:13 37:13 | 39:15 66:12 97:19 | 8:19,25 18:12 | +| engages 20:6 | 182:15,22 183:8 | 60:1 138:15 183:1 | 102:12 115:12 | 89:2 143:14 | +| engaging 157:20 | 187:21 190:12,19 | establish 41:23 | executed 161:2 | 145:10 193:20 | +| enquote 71:16 | 191:25 192:24 | 98:10 147:24 | executive 13:10 | 197:4 | +| ensuring 58:22 | 193:4 194:20 | established 24:20 | 22:11 | expert's 33:13 51:1 | +| entailed 131:3 | 195:17,20,23 | 26:25 52:4 53:10 | exemplar 108:20 | experts 14:17 19:17 | +| enter 111:9 132:24 | 200:5 201:23,24 | 198:7 | 201:9 | 141:2 | +| entered 201:22 | 203:11 205:24 | estate 17:17 | exemplars 63:11 | explain 27:2 65:19 | +| 219:15 | 206:23,24 207:6,9 | estimate 101:2 | exempted 9:13,19 | 78:22 136:24 | +| Entertainment | 208:12,14,16 | et 177:14 | exemption 47:12 | 203:25 211:8 | +| 204:25 | 214:19 215:18 | ethical 208:2 | 90:17,19 | explained 12:19 | +| enthusiasm 125:23 | 217:18 218:4 | evaluation 198:24 | exercise 29:9 160:23 | 125:15 174:25 | +| entire 73:14 85:14 | 219:10,15 220:21 | eve 14:12 117:4 | exercising 34:12 | explaining 138:15 | +| entirely 25:23 26:7 | 220:24 221:13 | event 166:12 | 208:14,17 | explanation 14:9 | +| 26:18 49:10 53:14 | 224:13 227:11 | eventually 163:16 | exhibit 56:3,4 57:12 | 26:21 | +| 84:20 169:21 | 229:18,21 230:1 | evidence 39:16 | 57:23 60:5 62:4 | exploitation 80:4 | +| entirety 224:22 | 230:16 232:6,10 | 44:24 45:2 49:20 | 62:11,15,25 63:23 | expose 191:25 | +| entitled 133:4 | 234:2 235:1 | 52:11 58:7 65:12 | 63:24 64:15 73:14 | exposure 121:8,22 | +| 172:12 | Epstein's 21:17 | 66:15,19 67:10,13 | 84:11 149:11 | 121:25 122:10 | +| entries 171:4 222:8 | 24:6 33:18 34:18 | 72:8,11 79:17 | 161:23 162:12,14 | 123:8 130:4,7,15 | +| 222:10 224:23 | 56:25 60:15 61:22 | 92:16 117:7 120:7 | 167:22 193:13 | 131:7 230:16 | +| entry 159:15 | 64:10 69:7 70:18 | 127:3,19 135:17 | 194:10 199:2 | expressed 14:22 | +| enumerated 98:15 | 70:24 71:11,13 | 140:23 141:4,23 | 200:7 204:7 | 104:3 | +| Epstein 1:5 2:11,15 | 76:13 81:21 83:14 | 146:7,11 150:8,13 | 207:21 217:6,21 | expressly 66:14 | +| 11:15 20:23 24:16 | 87:20 98:8 100:20 | 150:15,19,23 | 222:4 226:7,19 | 77:22 79:16 | +| 25:1,18,20 32:9 | 107:10 109:21 | 158:16 172:3 | 228:12,22 229:7 | extended 225:23 | +| 32:14,17,22,25 | 110:14 136:15 | 179:20 183:13 | 233:16 | extent 83:15 85:25 | +| 34:11 38:1,2 39:6 | 144:1,7 150:4 | 186:6 208:15 | exhibits 57:17 58:13 | 144:6 152:21 | +| 40:7 45:13 49:20 | 153:14 162:16 | 213:20 225:14 | 59:15,17 60:2,14 | 165:20 170:13 | +| 50:5 51:15 52:5 | 163:2 164:16 | 231:21 233:19 | 62:7,17 63:14 | 202:14 206:24 | +| 65:3 66:6 67:2 | 167:9,10 171:9 | evidenced 127:14 | 73:15,20 77:1 | extermination | +| 70:1 71:23 72:11 | 175:3 176:25 | evidencing 196:4 | 81:24 92:1 147:2 | 205:2 | +| 73:18 76:14 80:10 | 181:5 190:10 | 201:24 | 158:25 160:13 | extort 190:20 | +| 83:6,9,24 84:6,8 | 194:23 195:3,11 | evidentiary 56:14 | 161:19 173:21 | extra 62:18 88:14 | +| 85:2,12 89:14,16 | 196:4 201:24,25 | 141:17 188:20 | 199:4 206:11 | 89:13 108:5 | +| 95:5 97:3 98:15 | 202:9,12,19 | exactly 45:15 58:14 | 224:16 | extracurricular | +| 98:16,18 99:1 | 204:12 205:13 | 86:13 97:9 119:19 | exist 76:5 160:5 | 157:15 | +| 103:22 106:12 | 206:8 207:17 | 120:18 222:13 | existed 46:8 74:12 | extraordinarily | +| 107:2,15,18,24 | 208:23 209:8 | 225:6 227:4 | 74:21 76:7 115:21 | 101:13 | +| 108:4,6,15,20 | 212:2 214:12,21 | examination 197:7 | 130:16 151:12 | extraordinary | +| 109:5,17 110:15 | 216:23 217:14 | example 11:8,15 | 201:5 | 158:11 | +| 114:4,15,23 | 218:13 219:4 | 19:11 34:4 59:4 | existence 74:21 | extreme 114:15 | +| 115:25 116:20 | 228:6 231:6 | 85:17 89:14 108:2 | 75:15 156:8 192:9 | 180:15 | +| 117:14 119:8 | equivalent 232:12 | 118:12 133:23 | existing 27:19 52:21 | extremely 26:17 | + +| 31:3 82:19 128:12 | 21:10 29:16 31:19
31:22,23 131:5
175:22 | favorably 118:1,3
FBI 152:13 153:17
231:7 | 171:23 173:9
174:1 185:1 211:2
220:14 | 139:2 174:11
180:10 235:2,16
235:24 | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| F
fabricate 76:1,3 | factually 140:14 | February 211:16
232:7 | filed 42:11 46:13,15
47:19 55:17 62:14
43:19 55:17 62:14
63:5 73:6 75:14
75:16,19 87:21
109:5 115:8 116:1
116:2 117:3,12
121:19 124:12
125:11 126:13
129:4 130:16
131:12 132:6
137:6 140:19
144:2 170:23
172:15 174:10
182:12,14 184:25
186:22 220:9
228:25 229:18 | Firth 109:9
Fischer 4:19
fit 35:11 100:15
160:11
fits 100:11
five 8:3 14:3 61:15
91:15 93:19,22
116:11 143:4
218:18
fix 186:16
FL 123:2,4,8,13
95:23
flavor 145:22
flew 71:13
flexibility 221:25
flight 64:10,18,24
65:21 66:3,22,23
69:10,25 71:14
72:9 74:25 75:1
75:11 76:16 77:4
77:9,13,19 78:9
78:10,23,24 81:3
85:12,14 160:6
164:18 184:18
208:21 215:3
231:19
flights 70:1,23
Florida 1:2,17 4:21
15:17 16:19 18:20
22:4,12 23:13
25:16,24 37:19
41:19 49:17,25
52:4,15,21 59:1
72:5 79:13 95:2
95:17 97:17 98:3
98:13 117:19
120:10,16 121:24
137:4 173:19
238:4
Florida's 27:4 44:4
flow 115:1
flown 71:11
fluid 59:25
focus 7:17 9:22 12:3
32:9 33:10 42:2
45:6 75:3 158:3
focused 7:6 45:8
138:18 158:2
183:18 236:17
focuses 42:4 45:16
86:23
focusing 6:22 54:23
65:10 155:4
folders 208:8
folks 39:1 59:6
104:15 183:9 | | +| facilities 223:18,19 | false 4:6 16:15 | falls 11:1
false 4:6 16:15 | felony 175:18 177:2
177:4,5 | feeling 88:23,23
felony 175:18 177:2
177:4,5 | | +| facility 224:8 | 18:13 31:23 32:8 | fide 17:24 226:23
227:8 | fide 17:24 226:23
227:8 | files 169:17 207:12
filing 5:25 6:6,7,10
34:19 42:12 44:3
45:9,10,17 87:10
89:4 116:14
121:19 129:25
131:8 171:10
182:19 183:4
191:16 207:5,6
209:24 230:19 | | +| facing 123:9 186:25
207:10 230:16 | 44:15 51:12 67:20 | field 80:8 86:10,12
109:3 110:2,11,22
114:23 124:25
125:21 129:22
133:19 134:7,11 | | | | +| fact 8:21 18:22 19:2
36:12 37:6 38:9
38:10,20,24 40:6
41:5 67:6 74:14
74:17 77:17,23
78:24 79:19 84:13
85:11 94:3,14
103:2 104:1
108:17 116:19
133:9 137:11
142:16,17,18,21
143:13 144:18,19
144:22 149:6
150:13 153:12
168:7,24 169:7
171:13 175:25
176:17 178:3
180:22 199:4
206:25 213:14
227:2,7 232:18
236:19 | 83:6 17:21
138:4,25 139:1,20
139:25 140:6
142:15
falsity 9:4 10:1,12
26:6,11 31:11
41:22 47:23 49:20
49:22 82:13,20
84:24 86:18 88:10
136:19 146:3
familiar 4:23
104:10 172:7
familiarize 56:10
families 59:10 104:9
family 17:15,16,20
17:20
famous 70:2 71:10
fantasy 76:3
far 13:7 24:14 38:2
48:7 49:2 51:25
52:8 68:18 76:17
77:25 80:3 84:16
91:25 132:3
141:15 160:2
168:4 172:24
174:12 208:6
227:22
farther 125:19
fashion 28:9 60:18
107:13 137:3
155:18
fast 125:18
favor 17:24 124:8
favorable 119:10 | fifteen 227:15
FIFTEENTH 1:1
95:1
fifth 12:18 19:11,12
36:20 48:5,7
52:13 54:15 55:11
100:20 101:20,23
108:15 110:16
114:25 119:5,9
120:13,21 126:16
126:23 127:18
147:20 163:21
164:2,6 178:11
215:18 234:5
235:15 236:15
fight 125:7,9 130:12
fighting 17:17 80:11
figure 19:14,24 20:8
20:11 21:25 36:22
37:7 38:3,22
39:23 40:8 49:7
171:2
figures 69:12
file 10:22 31:13,18
31:21 47:17 90:25
105:3 116:7,8,12
125:12 144:8
150:4,7,10 151:17
151:25 152:3,5,8
159:19 168:18,25
169:7 170:11,13
170:18 171:8,8,21 | final 120:2,9 124:1
182:8
finality 105:24
133:4
financial 113:15
230:15
find 44:14,20,22
52:2 60:18 133:1
138:11 141:8,9
196:14 197:1
208:22
finding 53:8 122:22
140:16 168:2
199:19
finds 48:7 49:3 53:2
133:5
fine 51:6 164:13
185:25 203:18
219:19 225:16
finish 146:13
firm 20:13 65:8
75:20,22 88:21
128:7 183:5,20
205:11
firmer 107:22
first 6:21 12:25
13:19 15:19 16:6
27:22 33:10 42:3
49:15 88:4 92:22
93:10 96:21 97:12 | flights 70:1,23
Florida 1:2,17 4:21
15:17 16:19 18:20
22:4,12 23:13
25:16,24 37:19
41:19 49:17,25
52:4,15,21 59:1
72:5 79:13 95:2
95:17 97:17 98:3
98:13 117:19
120:10,16 121:24
137:4 173:19
238:4
Florida's 27:4 44:4
flow 115:1
flown 71:11
fluid 59:25
focus 7:17 9:22 12:3
32:9 33:10 42:2
45:6 75:3 158:3
focused 7:6 45:8
138:18 158:2
183:18 236:17
focuses 42:4 45:16
86:23
focusing 6:22 54:23
65:10 155:4
folders 208:8
folks 39:1 59:6
104:15 183:9 | | + +| followed 91:9 | 207:17 214:9 | give 5:19 11:7 30:15 | 93:7,20 96:11 | 233:15 237:2 | +|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------------| +| following 1:20 95:20 | front 12:5 59:12 | 39:9 46:19,22 | 98:14,21 101:1 | goose 149:6 | +| follows 128:22 | 112:12 217:7 | 58:5 64:11 91:18 | 102:9 103:8 105:5 | gotten 236:20 | +| food 126:17 224:1 | fruition 60:5 111:22 | 93:25 112:8 115:3 | 106:15 109:18 | govern 127:16 | +| footage 195:2 | frustrated 148:20 | 143:14 161:13 | 110:18 111:15,19 | 236:5 | +| footing 107:22 | frustration 148:23 | 174:16 181:25 | 112:2,9,13 113:12 | governed 126:25 | +| Foray 131:17 | 148:25 | 186:3 208:23 | 113:21 119:20 | government 10:22 | +| force 15:21 | full 70:2 103:7 | 221:9 236:7 | 125:5,6 126:20 | 12:16,25 13:11 | +| forcing 26:1,9 | 128:16 | given 27:15 82:5 | 127:12 133:20 | 35:24 36:8 48:11 | +| forefront 180:20 | fully 29:22 101:22 | 126:7 213:19 | 136:5,11,18 | 48:19,23 119:22 | +| foregoing 238:9 | fundamental 38:14 | 222:17 224:1 | 138:11,12 140:10 | government's 36:13 | +| forethought 154:21 | funds 26:10 | 225:22,24 228:12 | 140:11 142:3,6 | 36:15 | +| forfeiture 75:18 | further 14:16 36:19 | gives 15:4 | 143:24 145:9,10 | grant 113:4 117:21 | +| forget 60:12,12 | 79:4 133:2,5,15 | giving 39:25 40:1 | 147:3 148:5,12,12 | 124:19 | +| form 147:17 154:23 | 160:24 163:17 | 108:2 207:25 | 149:4,18 153:4,14 | granted 186:9 | +| 179:13 193:15 | 169:11 179:23 | 225:8 237:1 | 154:12 158:15 | great 40:19 84:19 | +| formed 194:3 | 218:6,7,15 229:16 | glad 3:7 92:22 | 160:10 163:15,16 | 86:2 89:14 94:15 | +| former 79:10 | 231:16 235:6 | 93:24 148:20 | 165:14 168:1,23 | 126:7 | +| forming 170:2 | futile 14:1 27:13,20 | global 59:20 140:15 | 173:18,23 174:21 | greater 44:24 45:1 | +| formula 155:21,23 | 28:6,21 29:12,15 | 140:16 170:8 | 179:22 180:4,19 | grocery 204:21 | +| formulate 169:1 | 49:1 51:22 53:10 | 171:3 179:17 | 181:8,25 184:12 | grossly 79:22 | +| Fort 76:9 | 54:5 | 236:15 | 185:4,10,13,14 | grounds 13:21 49:1 | +| forth 5:17 17:8 41:9 | futility 14:21 27:3 | globally 85:19 | 192:5,15,20 193:2 | 108:1 | +| 50:14 68:19 | 28:19 29:4 53:6 | 131:10 218:5 | 194:13,21,25 | guaranteeing 52:16 | +| 131:20 | future 148:15 231:3 | go 3:12 8:24 19:7 | 195:6 196:13 | guess 29:16 135:16 | +| Forty-five 196:3 | | 28:22 48:4 55:19 | 199:24 201:9 | 140:6 142:2 145:4 | +| Forty-six 196:20 | | 56:6,14 57:23 | 203:12 207:25 | 174:1 194:8 213:4 | +| forum 22:10,15 | | 58:12 60:15,16,24 | 208:24 210:3,11 | 233:17 | +| 48:11,23 78:6 | | 73:15,20 86:24 | 216:7 218:22 | guessing 221:2 | +| 81:8 | | 91:20 92:10 96:6 | 219:23 221:9,13 | 226:20 | +| forward 8:24 11:13 | | 96:17 102:23 | 222:12 224:21 | guidance 82:22 | +| 56:12 81:18 86:24 | | 106:16 109:25 | 226:21 227:5 | guiding 73:12 | +| 98:14 109:7,12,16 | | 111:19,20 121:11 | 228:15 232:3 | guilty 99:3 125:24 | +| 145:4,9 146:1 | | 121:12 134:22 | 234:23 235:2,8,15 | 126:2 176:7,18,21 | +| 174:16 181:25 | | 141:18 143:4 | 236:3,4,7,9,22,23 | 177:1,23,25 178:2 | +| found 31:3 50:3,7 | | 144:4 145:25 | | 178:21 179:10 | +| 53:13 134:12 | | 160:23 171:2 | 92:5,25 93:16 | guts 149:11 | +| 139:23,24 146:6 | | 174:15 177:20 | 96:4,8,9,18 97:12 | Guy 207:17 | +| 167:10 | | 184:1 222:12 | 97:24 101:25 | | +| four 8:3,8 116:8 | | 226:20,21 235:24 | 102:23 103:12,19 | | +| 124:13 143:5 | | 236:18 | 105:17,19,22 | | +| 218:12 226:9 | | goes 6:24 26:11,12 | 107:7 109:1 110:1 | Hafele 1:18 95:18 | +| fourteen 222:22 | | 39:13 140:15 | 112:5,16 113:23 | half 93:24 | +| Fourteenth 49:15 | | 143:3 170:4 177:6 | 115:2 116:22 | half-hour 231:3 | +| 52:13 | | 193:13 194:24 | 118:21 119:3 | 1:22 95:22 | +| fourth 5:24 17:13 | | 205:1 214:9 | 121:1 124:22,23 | 212:8 216:15 | +| 17:23 70:19 90:22 | | 234:12 | 134:7,22 176:5 | 238:7,16 | +| 135:11 173:4 | | going 8:25 9:2,24 | 210:7,13 219:22 | hand 108:12 199:4 | +| frame 100:14 | | 10:11 11:13 12:9 | | handcuffs 114:4 | +| 182:21 | | 20:5 33:22 37:2 | | handed 4:1 47:5 | +| frankly 11:6 31:15 | | 43:16 44:17 46:21 | | handle 229:14 | +| 35:4 117:10 | | 48:4 53:20 56:11 | | handled 102:4 | +| free 30:20 31:7 47:4 | | 56:12 57:11,25 | | handling 35:4 | +| 134:22 | | 58:3,25 59:14 | | hands 171:22 172:3 | +| Friday 7:24 | | 62:21 64:5 73:4 | | handwritten 211:15 | +| Fridovich 17:12 | | 73:13 74:5 78:2 | | 211:16 | +| 18:3 | | 78:21 82:6,12 | | happen 98:6 111:4 | +| friend 123:15 | | 83:4 84:11 85:5 | | 111:12 | +| Fronstin 206:8 | | 89:3 91:18 92:8 | | happened 24:14 | + +| happening 92:13
155:9 156:13 | higher 21:1,8
highlighted 188:17
189:1,3 | 155:2 158:14
160:9,25 161:11
162:20 163:19
165:3,19 167:1,6
167:24 168:20
169:13 170:25
171:11 172:24
174:22,23 175:14
176:4,12 178:2,19
181:6,13 182:7
184:5 187:18
188:8,23 189:14
190:7 191:7,9
192:7 197:13
198:3,17 199:18
202:5 203:9,25
204:15 206:10
208:8 209:12,21
210:9,22 213:7
214:6 215:12
216:4 217:5
219:15 220:8
221:10,20 223:9
225:21 226:22
227:5,20 229:9
230:5 235:10 | 62:8,13 63:15
66:23,24 67:8
161:23 202:19
220:15 229:4
235:20
identifies 57:18
179:1
identify 54:17,19
178:1 197:16
203:20
identifying 147:25
ignore 218:23
ignored 83:13
II 95:12
illegal 8:9
illicit 70:4
image 39:3
imagine 109:20
171:19 206:4
219:20
immunity 38:12
89:20
impact 123:18
168:3 169:24
205:8
impacted 157:17
impacts 123:20
imparted 180:22
impeach 175:20
impeachment
175:13
implemented 233:7
implicate 150:7
165:10,11
implicates 175:12
implicating 109:10
implication 178:12
implosion 116:3
128:7
importance 34:23
important 43:22
73:22 96:21
106:13 132:13,14
136:10 138:5
155:13 171:9
183:23 187:5
importantly 7:13
78:2
impose 236:10
impossible 194:21
impression 33:25
51:9 186:1
improper 53:4
improvement
228:20
inability 31:8
inadequate 24:24
inadmissible 150:14
inadvertent 104:16 | 165:25 166:4
inapplicable 48:25
49:10
inappropriate
196:10
inappropriately
70:5
inception 131:8
incident 158:8
197:24
incidentally 157:6
include 16:11,12
65:9 122:13
147:11,15
included 67:20
72:13 144:24
190:14 192:8
including 19:21
66:4,20 69:22
83:19,20 126:9
128:13 161:12
177:10 208:12
incredibly 173:22
incriminator 80:2
incumbent 224:15
independent 74:4
78:25 132:16
157:3
independently
190:25 231:4
indeterminate
111:3 113:1
indicate 55:16
60:21 146:20
201:3
indicated 59:23
73:9 77:22 99:10
102:5,8 121:4
129:12,19 144:10
149:24 152:16
162:18 188:16
199:1,22 202:8
204:11 210:5
212:15 214:10
218:14 236:11
indicates 157:10
indicating 177:6
201:2
indication 58:6
indirectly 48:20
81:15
individual 18:25
21:3 82:14 105:16
133:3 141:17
146:10 159:14
169:10 171:4
192:25 212:22
216:18 224:2
235:22 | | | | +|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| happening 92:13
155:9 156:13 | higher 21:1,8
highlighted 188:17
189:1,3 | 155:2 158:14
160:9,25 161:11
162:20 163:19
165:3,19 167:1,6
167:24 168:20
169:13 170:25
171:11 172:24
174:22,23 175:14
176:4,12 178:2,19
181:6,13 182:7
184:5 187:18
188:8,23 189:14
190:7 191:7,9
192:7 197:13
198:3,17 199:18
202:5 203:9,25
204:15 206:10
208:8 209:12,21
210:9,22 213:7
214:6 215:12
216:4 217:5
219:15 220:8
221:10,20 223:9
225:21 226:22
227:5,20 229:9
230:5 235:10 | 155:2 158:14
160:9,25 161:11
162:20 163:19
165:3,19 167:1,6
167:24 168:20
169:13 170:25
171:11 172:24
174:22,23 175:14
176:4,12 178:2,19
181:6,13 182:7
184:5 187:18
188:8,23 189:14
190:7 191:7,9
192:7 197:13
198:3,17 199:18
202:5 203:9,25
204:15 206:10
208:8 209:12,21
210:9,22 213:7
214:6 215:12
216:4 217:5
219:15 220:8
221:10,20 223:9
225:21 226:22
227:5,20 229:9
230:5 235:10 | 125:1,3
highly 207:4 224:25
234:14
Highway 1:17 95:17
hired 199:12
hits 194:7
Hoffman 127:8
hold 20:5 85:1
88:13 128:14
holding 15:18
hole 35:12
holiday 221:8
225:24
home 157:16 161:2
161:25 162:16
167:9,10,11,16
195:3,11 217:15
231:6
homes 162:25
homework 43:7
honestly 165:12
Honor 3:14,18 4:13
4:16,20 5:16 6:21
8:3 9:9 10:4 11:3
12:1,7 14:22
26:20 30:21 31:5
33:5,7,19 38:6,17
39:15 40:10,18
41:2,4,14 42:2
43:15 44:9 45:12
46:1,10 47:6 48:1
54:12,13,15 55:6
55:8,13 57:3,21
57:24 58:5 61:11
61:19 62:23 63:8
63:19 64:3,8,11
65:2 67:12,25
68:5,14 69:19
70:13 71:20 72:18
73:22 74:10,15,17
75:8 77:1 78:17
81:23 82:1 86:1,4
86:17 96:18 97:13
99:5,16 102:1,21
103:20 104:17
105:25 107:4
111:5 112:6,25
113:23 114:7
116:2 118:19
123:11,14 125:2
135:14 136:13
137:9 138:11
139:12 146:12,16
146:18 148:15,22
149:20 150:6,25
151:19 152:11,21
153:20 154:5 | 155:2 158:14
160:9,25 161:11
162:20 163:19
165:3,19 167:1,6
167:24 168:20
169:13 170:25
171:11 172:24
174:22,23 175:14
176:4,12 178:2,19
181:6,13 182:7
184:5 187:18
188:8,23 189:14
190:7 191:7,9
192:7 197:13
198:3,17 199:18
202:5 203:9,25
204:15 206:10
208:8 209:12,21
210:9,22 213:7
214:6 215:12
216:4 217:5
219:15 220:8
221:10,20 223:9
225:21 226:22
227:5,20 229:9
230:5 235:10 | 62:8,13 63:15
66:23,24 67:8
161:23 202:19
220:15 229:4
235:20
identifies 57:18
179:1
identify 54:17,19
178:1 197:16
203:20
identifying 147:25
ignore 218:23
ignored 83:13
II 95:12
illegal 8:9
illicit 70:4
image 39:3
imagine 109:20
171:19 206:4
219:20
immunity 38:12
89:20
impact 123:18
168:3 169:24
205:8
impacted 157:17
impacts 123:20
imparted 180:22
impeach 175:20
impeachment
175:13
implemented 233:7
implicate 150:7
165:10,11
implicates 175:12
implicating 109:10
implication 178:12
implosion 116:3
128:7
importance 34:23
important 43:22
73:22 96:21
106:13 132:13,14
136:10 138:5
155:13 171:9
183:23 187:5
importantly 7:13
78:2
impose 236:10
impossible 194:21
impression 33:25
51:9 186:1
improper 53:4
improvement
228:20
inability 31:8
inadequate 24:24
inadmissible 150:14
inadvertent 104:16 | 165:25 166:4
inapplicable 48:25
49:10
inappropriate
196:10
inappropriately
70:5
inception 131:8
incident 158:8
197:24
incidentally 157:6
include 16:11,12
65:9 122:13
147:11,15
included 67:20
72:13 144:24
190:14 192:8
including 19:21
66:4,20 69:22
83:19,20 126:9
128:13 161:12
177:10 208:12
incredibly 173:22
incriminator 80:2
incumbent 224:15
independent 74:4
78:25 132:16
157:3
independently
190:25 231:4
indeterminate
111:3 113:1
indicate 55:16
60:21 146:20
201:3
indicated 59:23
73:9 77:22 99:10
102:5,8 121:4
129:12,19 144:10
149:24 152:16
162:18 188:16
199:1,22 202:8
204:11 210:5
212:15 214:10
218:14 236:11
indicates 157:10
indicating 177:6
201:2
indication 58:6
indirectly 48:20
81:15
individual 18:25
21:3 82:14 105:16
133:3 141:17
146:10 159:14
169:10 171:4
192:25 212:22
216:18 224:2
235:22 | + +| individually 1:8,8
95:8,8 | insinuation 196:8
insist 93:8 | 180:8 221:3,3,4
225:13 228:13 | 84:12,16 85:20
92:16 93:19 | 153:18 155:7,22
156:1,7 157:23 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| individuals 68:22
69:7 70:2 72:1 | inspection 195:3
inspections 223:20 | introducing 151:9
233:1 | 100:23 107:19,20
118:17 131:11 | 163:2 169:21
172:10 176:7 | +| 98:5,24 102:8,10
102:15 106:3,4,17 | instance 69:23
207:21 | introduction 66:15
79:16 159:8 | 132:12 133:14
149:3 155:19 | 180:8,10 181:5
190:10,12 191:25 | +| 177:24 178:7
180:3 187:10
195:8 230:4 | instances 33:15
201:12 | invalid 16:16 19:9
28:16,20 29:10 | 160:4,8 166:13
168:22 173:7 | 193:4 194:20
195:20 202:19 | +| INDYKE 2:16,17 | institute 47:14
173:11 | inventory 162:6
inverting 21:16 | 174:3 175:23
179:23 190:9 | 208:11,16 212:2
217:17 218:12 | +| infancy 125:14 | instituted 146:23 | investigating
206:18 207:1 | 191:9 195:6,9,12 | 227:11 232:6 | +| infer 141:3 | institution 45:3,16 | investigation 6:6
151:6 152:18 | 201:1 205:14
221:5 224:9 227:1 | JEGE 214:25
jeopardy 207:10 | +| inference 234:7 | instruct 140:21
173:16,19 | investigation 6:6
153:18 167:12,14 | 227:7 229:14
230:4,10 234:17 | jet 69:7 156:12,14
jobs 59:9 | +| inferences 110:20
110:21 125:5
131:17 141:4
163:23 | instruction 140:25
173:16,19 | investigators 69:5
71:8 | issue-by-issue
192:16,21 | joining 7:10
joins 183:5,20
joint 190:13 | +| inflame 80:7 81:16 | insufficiency 15:2 | investing 69:14
200:7 | issued 25:17 90:22
161:21 210:24 | journal 231:6
JR 2:9 | +| inflammatory 70:25
153:25 180:21
233:16,21 | insufficient 14:2
135:7 | investment 71:15
investments 205:14 | issues 14:15 19:16
21:1 32:2 36:10 | judge 1:18 3:11
91:4,8 92:5 95:18 | +| inflate 83:21 | intend 101:22 198:6
intended 16:1 | investments 205:14
investors 76:12
83:23 | issues 14:15 19:16
21:1 32:2 36:10
37:9,9,25 50:23 | 97:18 98:2 99:8,9
103:17 105:22 | +| inflection 17:6
inflicted 232:11 | intending 67:9
183:13 | invocation 100:20
101:20 126:16 | issues 14:15 19:16
21:1 32:2 36:10
37:9,9,25 50:23 | 103:17 105:22
109:2 111:9 112:3 | +| influence 174:20
191:20,22 208:23 | intent 85:1 101:17
160:18 190:10 | involved 21:15
83:11 98:6 101:14 | issues 14:15 19:16
21:1 32:2 36:10
37:9,9,25 50:23 | 121:4 131:18
133:7,12 136:6,9
141:2,22 145:16
175:9 179:4
236:24 | +| information 55:6
67:1 69:4 78:25
86:23,25 94:5
137:8,14 140:18
146:22 159:4,4
169:20 172:16
179:23 180:18,21
185:5 206:7
214:12 215:3
218:7 231:17,25
234:19,24 | intentional 17:6
intentionally 171:12
interest 36:16 133:1
190:21 202:16
interested 168:20
230:3
interfere 134:6
interference 17:7
interior 161:14
international 66:9
69:11 | invoke 101:23
110:16 114:24
involved 21:15
83:11 98:6 101:14
153:8 157:22
168:14 197:23
217:2 223:13
involvement 19:20
19:22 20:7 48:20
138:19 216:24 | issuing 6:5 25:17
items 207:15 217:25 | judges 5:12 9:12
58:18 90:7 135:10
judgment 107:14
107:16,17 112:19
112:22 117:1,5
123:5 124:7
125:16 130:22
226:16 | +| inherent 18:14
initial 34:20 42:25
45:9,10 109:25
197:15 | interplay 108:10
interpose 10:21
interrogatories
189:6 190:1
interrupt 81:1
181:13,16 | involving 13:9
66:16 106:17
125:25 126:3
150:22 175:18
176:8
ipso 85:13
irrelevant 64:25
71:1 75:13 76:16
77:2 78:12 151:7
153:24 167:16
174:3 175:10
196:6 199:20
irrespective 33:23
Islands 100:2
isolated 158:7,8,9
issue 3:3 6:22 27:3
33:1,5 38:7,14
48:21 49:5 56:13
56:18,25 57:4
59:2 75:13 77:7
81:19 83:8 84:1 | J 2:5
Jack 2:9,13 92:23
jail 150:2 182:16
192:1
Jane 70:22 83:3
98:5 102:7,14
105:16 128:5
154:8 158:3,4
165:8 186:21
187:11 215:9
Jansen 8:2 193:14
193:19 194:8,14
194:16
Jansen's 193:10,12
193:18
Jeffrey 1:5 2:11,15
32:8,13,14 61:22
65:3 66:6 67:2
81:20 95:5 121:5
136:15 150:4 | judicial 1:1 5:21
7:11,16 9:18,23
16:7 22:11 26:9
28:14 35:8 42:5,8
42:22 64:17 74:1
79:13 88:14 89:13
95:1 108:5 137:9
162:23 188:18
226:17 229:16
juggling 92:7
juncture 53:23
77:15 103:10
112:23 149:10
junctures 134:17
135:3
June 175:9 209:12
jurisdiction 13:3
18:6 20:25 21:12
120:17
jurisdictions 97:6
100:2,25 101:7 | + +| jury 12:6 44:4,7
51:16 54:18,21
67:10 79:8,18
80:7 81:16 82:8
87:12 110:21
123:5 133:7,12
139:21 140:17,21
140:22 142:3,9,21
142:24 143:12
145:5 146:4 148:9
151:10,11 159:12
166:3 169:9
173:15,19 178:4,9
191:14 201:15
222:9,12 225:1
226:19 233:13 | 141:18,18 143:17
146:5 147:3 148:4
148:10,17 151:18
151:20 154:11
157:3 164:20
165:10 167:3
171:14 172:2
175:4 176:20
178:23 181:7,18
182:1 197:5 200:6
201:21 210:17
211:7,18 212:17
214:13 216:2,20
217:20 220:4
226:18 | large 58:12 167:22
191:4,23
largely 143:24
larger 191:5
Larry 180:24
late 21:9 28:13
Lauderdale 76:9
law 6:2 7:15 9:11
16:16 19:10 20:13
24:20 25:24 26:19
26:25 28:1,16
29:2,14,20 41:6
49:4,25 52:4,7,21
52:25 53:10 54:2
58:24 59:1,21
66:11 72:5,5,23
74:8,17 86:9 87:2
87:12 88:21 90:2
124:16 126:10
136:23 139:21
142:9 144:2,11
156:16 157:19
165:22 166:5
173:20 174:14
189:25 191:2
196:4 217:14
laws 28:4 36:12
52:18
lawsuit 5:15 6:11
7:10 9:20 36:1
41:13 42:11,12
43:12 46:13,17
47:17,19 76:8,19
86:24 90:6,15,24
99:15 107:11
109:5,7 110:3,8
123:1 130:1
137:17 146:1
152:23 170:23
174:10 189:22
191:17 230:20
lawsuits 8:11 73:16
73:17,20 75:23
152:24 182:11,20
189:18 191:24
lawyer 37:14,14
43:5,19 94:15
101:1 110:16
207:17
lawyers 5:11 39:9
88:11 90:7 190:15
lays 5:13,14
lead 65:11 72:7
145:20 220:17
224:12 225:7
leadership 190:17
leading 71:1 190:13
leafing 177:16
learned 45:13 | leave 3:16 56:23
leaves 183:21
led 185:5
left 56:2 62:3,10
143:5,5
legal 15:2 16:15
23:23 24:1 27:18
28:10,25 30:2
35:20 42:15 51:21
118:10 129:22
130:20 131:4
226:21
legally 14:2 28:20
29:10 51:23
legislative 13:10
legitimacy 83:2
169:2,5
legitimate 140:7
length 100:8 118:23
lengthier 226:6
let's 56:14 64:1 86:3
91:16 96:6 97:8
107:24 139:12
145:1 150:5
160:23 174:15
letter 62:5 196:20
199:13 205:16
206:15 207:11
209:18 210:6
213:2 214:6,9
215:21
letters 206:2,12
207:16 208:15
209:7,10 216:3
level 8:5 92:11
103:10 105:14
114:18,23 133:19
134:6 184:14
Lexington 2:16
liability 9:13,19
16:5 37:3 73:24
97:5 109:11 121:8
183:2 191:3,5
Liabos 74:14
liberality 27:5
license 164:20
life 98:22 157:16
192:1
lifetime 173:6
light 25:10 36:25
54:22 178:10
221:8 222:24
223:1
likelihood 121:3
171:6 180:4
196:12 224:22
limine 59:25 61:4
61:23 62:12 63:13
63:18 | limit 51:5 53:23
121:18 236:3
limitation 116:17
121:15 191:7
limitations 10:7
17:5 101:3,9
limited 23:18 36:22
54:17,20 101:10
106:8 113:7
117:22 125:9
limited-purpose
49:7
line 47:17,18 51:6
68:7 105:13
179:15 199:23
lines 10:23
Link 2:3,5 3:10,14
3:15 4:20,24
10:17,24 11:3
12:8 30:12 31:5
33:9,19 37:1 38:5
38:16,19 39:21
40:13 43:1 45:6
45:21 46:10,23
47:5 48:3 61:11
63:8,12 64:2 73:8
83:10 86:4,7,17
87:4,16 88:4,7
89:6,10 92:20
96:2 104:12,13,19
105:3 135:18,25
136:1,5,8,16
137:2 141:21
143:22 144:19
145:8 146:12
159:25 178:19
181:2,13,16 182:3
182:5 186:15,19
187:2,7,15 188:3
188:8 236:24
Link's 31:2 72:22
153:9
linked 33:17 51:13
linking 50:24
links 53:19
list 56:4 57:12 62:11
62:15,16,25 63:23
63:24,25 66:3
73:14 104:14
160:13 161:23
164:25 177:24
180:23 189:7
202:17 204:12
205:3,23 212:16
215:4 226:7
listed 57:23 62:14
63:8 81:20 158:25
159:15 160:12
161:11 181:9 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| K | | | | | +| K 2:16,17 | L | | | | +| Kalina 22:21 | L 197:3,15 | | | | +| KARA 2:4 | L.M 34:21 70:22 | | | | +| keep 43:15 158:1
200:9 236:23 | 83:3 102:14 | | | | +| keeping 180:19 | 122:12,20 128:4 | | | | +| keeps 150:18
195:20 212:5
149:21 | 145:13 154:8
158:2,4 186:21 | | | | +| key 9:14 40:17 | 158:2,4 186:21 | | | | +| kind 91:5 92:6
96:21 99:18
109:10 114:9
157:20 | L.R 158:21 197:7
197:17
labels 211:12,13
lack 22:24 26:12
40:24 41:21 67:15
138:24 139:14
219:7 | | | | +| knew 49:20 64:22
71:23,24,25 72:12
73:6 115:25
144:25 146:22
155:22 156:8,9,10
156:13,14,17,18
156:19 157:25
158:5 169:24
173:8 178:13 | ladies 104:8 159:18
197:23
lady 197:10 216:22
Lakes 1:23 2:3,8
95:23
language 15:25
123:14 137:20 | | | | +| know 23:17 33:21
50:6 56:8,16 58:3
58:19,25 60:25
65:25 70:12 80:12
92:19,24 93:5
101:8,9,24 102:19
104:7,8 107:5,7,8
115:20 121:9
123:14 137:20 | ladies 104:8 159:18
197:23
lady 197:10 216:22
Lakes 1:23 2:3,8
95:23
language 15:25
Lanna 207:19 | | | | + +| 187:10 204:1 | 43:21,22 44:4,8 | 32:24 34:2 40:20 | math 115:16 129:15 | 128:10 129:6 | +|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------| +| 210:19 214:18 | 55:9 67:12 68:23 | 42:3 44:9,19 51:7 | mathematical | 130:2 205:12 | +| 217:25 | 70:13 100:8 | 51:24 64:20 72:25 | 115:13 | 212:24 219:21 | +| listen 136:6 | 114:14 126:24 | 73:7 74:8 75:12 | matter 7:15 16:16 | mentioning 77:17 | +| listened 102:2 | 137:6,7 142:13 | 78:1 80:10,18 | 19:10 21:6,14,17 | mentions 20:23 | +| listening 104:7 | 143:2 145:2,13 | 82:11 86:19,22 | 22:1,14 28:16 | 68:20 85:12 | +| listing 151:24 220:5 | 168:20 179:9 | 87:13 115:7 116:6 | 29:20 32:22 44:21 | mere 14:5 85:11 | +| 223:6 | 185:18 193:7 | 122:10 123:9 | 49:3 57:6 74:11 | 192:9 | +| lists 63:13 157:4 | 200:16 203:2 | 130:17 131:7 | 78:10 83:11 85:3 | merely 52:7 | +| 218:2 | 205:22 208:8 | 140:12 143:21 | 97:12,16 98:1,4 | merits 29:23 121:2 | +| literally 184:6 | 209:17,22 234:21 | 151:7 165:14 | 99:2 111:11 113:7 | 182:23 | +| litigant 15:12 47:12 | looked 41:2,18 | 180:16 185:22 | 119:16 121:1 | messages 167:9 | +| 85:4 128:18 | 101:18 118:1,4 | 191:16 194:12 | 122:12 123:12 | Miami 88:21 | +| litigate 26:10 88:22 | 136:12 138:16 | 196:11 207:5 | 128:20 133:2,6,11 | mid-thought 96:3 | +| litigated 97:16 | 139:4,8 154:6 | 220:20,24 227:22 | 149:12,13 162:23 | 135:21 | +| litigation 4:11 5:3 | 161:15 | maliciously 6:24 | 165:22 166:5 | middle 91:13 | +| 6:10 9:5 11:10 | looking 72:25 112:1 | 121:19 228:25 | 172:6,13 179:25 | 157:12 197:15 | +| 12:23 14:5 15:6 | 137:2,21 138:3 | 230:19,20 | 181:8 188:18 | Militano 127:5 | +| 15:11,15 21:4 | 212:20 222:14 | malpractice 99:14 | 189:6 215:16 | million 145:6,7,8 | +| 25:7,12 37:4 | looks 68:8 162:9 | managed 57:13 | 232:16 233:2 | mind 31:5 45:24 | +| 42:14 47:11 69:20 | 204:20 | manager 207:24 | matters 23:18 49:10 | 47:20 60:7 93:3 | +| 69:21,24 70:5 | lose 106:24 | Mancusi 18:20 | 57:10 65:9 67:14 | 148:25 174:20 | +| 71:14 83:19 87:11 | loss 45:1 113:19 | 40:25 41:16 47:6 | 80:24 81:14 85:18 | 181:14,16 182:3 | +| 87:25 88:17,25 | lost 227:18 | manifest 214:25 | 97:4 99:15,16,22 | 186:15 232:20 | +| 89:20,22 90:1,5,8 | lot 21:23 60:10 | 215:2 | 114:8 133:17 | 234:12 | +| 90:12,18,20 | 73:15 93:3 99:6 | manifestations | 134:23 148:11 | mindful 58:17 | +| 103:15,16 113:21 | 138:13 220:6 | 127:23 | 168:12 175:6 | mine 62:19 189:3 | +| 115:11 117:14 | 235:11 | manifests 70:1 | 203:6 211:2 | mini-trials 189:18 | +| 144:24 165:23 | luck 134:23 | ██████████ 51:19 58:23 | 213:17 220:14 | minor 179:2,5 | +| 188:7 219:21 | lunch 91:14 | 83:4 94:7 100:15 | maximum 228:19 | minority 176:24 | +| 221:12,18 226:7 | lying 175:20 | 133:19 154:19,20 | Maxwell 231:10 | minors 101:14 | +| little 19:7 30:13 | | manslaughter | MC2 200:4,4,7,13 | 103:5 165:25 | +| 60:17 68:4 141:15 | | 17:22 118:14 | mean 19:2 39:1 | 177:14 | +| 183:25 221:7 | M-I-L-I-T-A-N-O | Mar-a-Lago 205:1 | 40:8 63:23 81:1 | minute 72:19 | +| live 132:15 | 127:5 | March 112:14 | 137:8,9 142:8 | 139:12 | +| lived 103:13 | mail 204:18,22 | 113:11 | 181:22 182:11 | minutes 30:16,23 | +| lobby 13:9 | maintain 90:15,24 | margin 129:7 | 183:8 184:24 | 46:19,20 61:15,16 | +| locate 159:13 | 133:18 | Maria 215:6 | 223:2 | 93:19,21 115:3 | +| log 69:10 85:14 | maintenance | marketing 70:8 | meaning 32:23 38:9 | 181:25 186:14 | +| 160:6 | 204:23 | Marra 97:18 98:2 | 77:8 89:1 228:1 | mirrors 218:13 | +| logs 64:10,18,24 | majority 157:6 | 99:8,9 103:18 | means 16:14 28:10 | misleading 233:13 | +| 65:21 66:3,22,23 | making 40:1 41:12 | 111:9 112:3 121:4 | 31:16 32:10 43:4 | misrepresent | +| 71:15 72:9 74:25 | 54:5 84:22 100:11 | marshal 194:18 | 112:22 193:1 | 171:13 | +| 75:1,11 76:16 | 106:11 118:7 | massage 156:22 | 214:14 | missed 73:2,2 | +| 77:4,9,13,20 78:9 | 137:19,25 146:8 | 200:25 201:4,5,19 | mechanism 26:9 | misspoken 184:22 | +| 78:11,24,25 81:3 | 178:16 230:13 | massages 201:7 | medical 223:15 | misstated 186:16 | +| 85:12 150:2,11 | malice 22:16,25 | massive 156:2 | 228:17,19 | mistake 32:1 162:1 | +| 156:7,11 159:20 | 23:1 26:12 43:24 | material 72:10 | member 17:16,20 | mistaken 97:21 | +| 164:19 184:18 | 191:12,14 | 147:10 153:1 | 17:21 65:7 | misunderstood 89:9 | +| 208:21 231:19 | malicious 4:12 5:5,6 | 158:17 160:14 | Members 212:17 | mitigate 34:6 | +| long 9:11 85:22 | 7:6,14 8:18 10:9 | 175:25 178:16 | memorandum | mix 79:25 122:14 | +| 93:11,15 94:13 | 11:12,19,23 12:4 | 207:3 227:10,13 | 134:18 135:4 | mixed 41:5 74:16 | +| 111:14,18,20 | 12:20 13:5,12 | 236:23 | memories 91:3 | model 216:22 | +| 117:19 118:5 | 15:7,13,16,19 | materiality 192:2 | 123:20 | molestation 150:23 | +| 177:24 206:3 | 16:21 17:10,14,25 | materially 78:14 | memory 195:9 | 151:4 178:21 | +| longer 57:9 101:13 | 18:7,15,23 19:4 | 196:17 | memos 29:1 | 179:7,8,13 185:12 | +| 119:4 229:1 | 21:13 22:19,22 | materials 3:8 46:24 | mentioned 70:11 | 185:15 234:4 | +| look 4:24 6:12 10:3 | 23:7 25:8,13,25 | 96:15 122:7 126:8 | 77:9,10 92:17 | molestations 219:4 | +| 29:23 31:18 42:7 | 26:3,19 30:6 | 168:1,8 236:7 | 97:2 105:20 | 230:1 | + +| molester 11:16 | names 33:16 69:10 | 182:8,17 187:19 | 226:8 | obviously 16:10 | +|----------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------| +| molesting 178:2 | 102:16 103:9,14 | 225:4 | NPA 97:7 100:23 | 36:15 57:25 63:6 | +| 232:23 233:3 | 103:18 104:6,7,9 | new 2:17 14:16 | 102:11 111:1,10 | 65:18 71:19 83:7 | +| moment 68:16 | 104:15 105:10,20 | 19:15 25:23 26:22 | 133:6 182:22 | 126:7 152:25 | +| 88:13 130:3 | 147:11,15 149:14 | 43:4 71:16 100:2 | number 33:15 | 165:21 169:21 | +| money 44:23 71:16 | 149:23 154:6 | 127:6 202:13 | 58:12 62:11 64:9 | 189:21 206:19 | +| 212:9 | 205:3 212:22 | 232:5 235:4 | 98:6 102:7 145:11 | 215:14 220:6 | +| month 14:7 226:10 | narrow 4:10 47:12 | newspaper 76:10 | 146:17 149:19 | 227:10 | +| months 132:7,10 | 137:3 160:17,18 | 111:24 193:3,23 | 152:12 153:5,16 | occasion 158:11 | +| morning 3:1,14 | 224:16 | 194:1,6,19 234:20 | 159:2 160:25 | occasions 35:5 | +| 55:17 72:22 73:9 | nation 90:23 | 235:4 | 161:22 162:19 | 134:9 | +| 75:9 137:5 236:3 | nature 19:1 21:3 | newspapers 125:18 | 165:2 167:7,8 | occupants 66:4 | +| motion 3:3,16 13:17 | 59:25 83:13 89:2 | nexus 36:18 | 168:17 180:23 | occur 130:13 | +| 13:22 14:19 20:10 | 108:19,22 134:4 | night 122:6 193:16 | 188:11 189:10 | occurred 130:23 | +| 26:20 27:9 28:11 | 189:21 224:14 | nine 62:11 64:9 | 190:14 191:4,6,23 | 157:7,23 213:15 | +| 28:12,22 29:6,13 | near 231:2 | 115:17 116:21 | 193:5 194:18 | occurring 72:12 | +| 29:24 32:4 55:7 | necessarily 28:20 | 123:24 149:19 | 207:22 210:4,6,22 | offend 130:18,19 | +| 61:23 62:8,12,22 | 112:20 199:2 | 219:21 | 215:1 223:12,13 | offender 177:11 | +| 63:9,12,18 92:3,7 | 210:14 224:8 | nine-page 212:21 | 223:25 225:18 | 202:9,12,20 232:7 | +| 96:19 100:4,22 | necessary 34:16 | nine-year 123:17 | 226:14,15 | offender's 234:13 | +| 107:13 112:18 | 130:19 131:4 | 224:24 | numbers 147:12,12 | offense 66:16,17 | +| 115:18 116:25 | 164:14 188:6 | Nineteen 163:4 | 147:16 149:15,23 | 129:24 234:13 | +| 117:4,18,25 118:8 | 198:10 205:25 | Ninety-eight 217:11 | 159:13 177:2 | offenses 98:16 | +| 124:19 125:11,12 | 208:25 229:24 | Ninety-four 216:5 | 205:4 | 125:24 | +| 126:12,13 127:20 | necessity 108:14 | Ninety-nine 217:12 | numerous 35:5 | offensive 108:18 | +| 132:5 135:7 | 126:22 208:21 | Ninety-seven 217:9 | NY 2:17 | 129:25 133:22 | +| 163:18 164:1 | need 3:19 7:17 9:5 | Ninety-six 216:15 | | offer 148:5 158:15 | +| 193:14,19 194:14 | 9:21 10:1 19:16 | ninth 23:11 48:6 | | 160:10 198:6 | +| 194:16 226:15 | 29:5 36:19 44:17 | 51:25 52:22 54:1 | oath 76:2 175:20 | 225:4 | +| 235:25 | 57:3 59:12 60:19 | 115:9 | 190:2,4 | offered 58:7 148:4 | +| motions 51:4 53:24 | 62:19 82:24 91:12 | Nodar 22:4 23:2 | object 162:14 | 187:2 207:24 | +| 56:2 59:4,25 61:3 | 94:3 98:10 105:12 | Noerr 36:9 48:14 | 194:10 | 225:20 | +| 94:9 235:24 | 116:7 117:6,16 | Noerr-Pennington 13:8 | objected 64:16 | offering 166:11 | +| motive 190:10 | 158:14 161:19 | non-prosecution 98:9,11,17,19,21 | 81:19 188:24 | 186:19 224:15 | +| 191:3,11,13 | 186:17 200:21 | 98:25 99:11,17,23 | objecting 62:7 | office 64:12 75:20 | +| 192:12 | 201:10 209:17 | 104:23 106:5,23 | objection 56:12 | 81:25 98:12 135:1 | +| mountain 194:6 | 210:23 215:16 | 110:14 111:7 | 105:7,11 149:25 | 162:2 196:21 | +| move 28:23 31:6 | 222:1 229:8,10 | 115:24 118:25 | 152:1,10 164:24 | 207:1,19 | +| 58:15 81:18 86:3 | 230:25 | 120:4,12,25 121:6 | 180:5 186:10 | officer 20:2 | +| 174:15 | needed 147:22 | 182:16,25 | 196:13 199:25 | offices 129:3 | +| moved 125:19 | needing 94:16 | noon 91:16 | 204:10 207:14 | official 20:3 21:25 | +| moving 37:4 | needs 6:21 54:10 | normally 28:8 | 209:7 219:6 222:3 | offing 67:13 | +| Mr-Scarola 59:20 | 56:20 67:12 97:10 | notation 122:2 | 222:15 225:18 | 26:4 | +| multiple 14:14 | 128:20 151:18,19 | note 13:1 211:15,17 | objections 62:13,15 | okay 12:8 63:4 65:1 | +| 213:14 | 153:15 181:12 | noted 19:14 22:20 | 63:5 230:6 235:7 | 69:1,17 92:4 | +| murder 17:20 | 191:15 | noted 19:14 22:20 | objective 137:15,22 | 104:18 105:21 | +| murdered 17:16 | negligence 34:15 | Notepad/notes 215:6 | 153:14 155:21 | 109:1 136:7 | +| muster 35:21 51:21 | negligent 79:22 | notepads 167:10,15 | 156:3 170:1 | 151:21 154:15 | +| N | 37:23 | notes 238:10 | objectively 155:19 | 167:25 192:14 | +| N 1:17 95:17 | neither 48:14 86:15 | notice 79:13 162:23 | obligation 25:14 | 193:12 205:5 | +| N-O-E-R-R 48:14 | net 163:11 | 188:19 213:18 | obliged 160:13 | 236:1,5 237:3 | +| name 50:24 103:23 | never 5:6 15:11 | 226:17 | 202:15,21 | omnibus 61:23 | +| 104:15 177:1,18 | 16:23,24 25:1 | notification 196:20 | observation 59:21 | 62:12 63:12,18,20 | +| 180:25 181:6 | 35:6,6 46:14 | notoriety 21:16,20 | observe 115:9,17 | onboard 69:7 70:3 | +| 197:11,16 | 70:21 73:6 74:7 | November 56:3 | observed 116:2 | once 12:3 42:11 | +| named 156:20 | 76:22 107:18,20 | 59:23 63:5 72:23 | obtain 57:24 78:24 | 61:10 65:7 83:10 | +| 176:16 | 123:15 160:5,6 | 74:16 175:15 | obvious 36:14 | 91:3 134:14,15 | +| | | | 101:15 | 142:24 206:14 | +| | | | | 228:25 236:18 | + +| one's 132:15 | 80:5 88:24 89:16 | paragraphs 74:5 | party 13:22,25 | 170:1 177:4 | +|----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------| +| ones 28:18 69:18 | 89:24 148:8 | parallels 127:20 | 118:7 123:15 | 179:11 200:4 | +| 80:13 221:2 | 167:11,15 173:18 | parameter 100:12 | 221:18 224:15 | 203:20 233:18 | +| ongoing 113:20 | 201:15 | parameters 100:21 | 234:3,8,11,16 | personal 92:11 | +| 208:18 228:18 | | 101:16 | party's 132:18 | 94:16 127:1,15 | +| online 193:3 194:18 | outstanding 112:19 | Pardon 181:15 | pass 35:20 51:20 | 128:14 151:23 | +| open 53:18 76:18 | outweighed 78:14 | parent 22:5 | passed 13:15 | 157:17 | +| opening 11:24 | 196:18 233:12 | parenthetically | 181:18 | perspective 100:17 | +| 57:18 | overall 145:22,23 | 45:4 | passenger 69:25 | 100:18,19 101:18 | +| opinion 4:13,15 7:8 | 83:21 | parse 15:24 25:6,22 | 214:25 215:1,4 | 130:20 | +| 22:21 38:9 90:22 | overnight 211:13 | 74:4 139:22 | passport 163:4 | pertain 103:4 | +| 143:15 | overriding 141:9 | 179:14 | 164:16 | pertaining 199:21 | +| opinions 141:1 | overruled 168:16 | parsing 25:24 | patience 236:25 | pertains 34:24 | +| 146:8 186:3 | 186:11 227:2,14 | part 11:17 18:14 | patient 173:22 | pertinent 35:15 | +| opponent 234:8,11 | 58:24 59:2 | 31:9 37:18 63:21 | pattern 66:20 | 170:9 | +| 234:17 | | 66:7 67:14 71:6 | 158:12 160:11 | petition 10:22 12:16 | +| opportunity 30:1 | owened 164:25 | 72:24 77:20 83:17 | Paul 191:2 | 36:7 | +| 46:22 60:3,4 | 205:23 | 89:18 97:7 98:20 | pause 68:13 | petitioning 12:24 | +| 61:13 65:19 | ownership 202:16 | 99:17 105:4 106:4 | pay 207:24 | 35:23 48:11,23 | +| 121:17,18 144:14 | | 118:20 128:3 | paying 156:18 | Phillip 12:12 | +| 222:17 236:18 | | 132:1 140:22 | payment 207:23 | phone 81:21,24 | +| opposed 49:24 | | 147:25 150:8 | peculiarities 127:2 | 82:3,10 136:15 | +| opposing 13:24 55:2 | P 2:9 | 155:21 158:11 | 127:16 | 146:14,18,25 | +| 57:12 155:16 | P.A 2:3,7,12 | 163:18 168:15,16 | peculiarity 127:22 | 147:9 149:7,11,21 | +| 57:12 155:16 | p.m 1:16 94:21,21 | 180:18 183:17 | 128:19 | 156:6,9 159:13,14 | +| opposite 36:6 37:13 | 95:16 237:6 | 186:9,10,10,11 | peg 35:12 | 160:5 162:9 185:6 | +| 53:9,14 | PACER 112:16 | 190:11 194:3 | pejorative 83:6 | 231:6 | +| oral 30:11 126:6,21 | 22:18,24 223:6,7 | 201:14 202:11 | pendency 115:10,24 | phonetic 131:17 | +| oranges 80:1 | package 55:4 | 207:12 208:10,18 | 117:22 128:4 | photograph 203:9 | +| order 25:17 31:17 | packages 209:24 | 210:18 | 188:7 | 231:10 | +| 54:7 96:10 111:9 | packet 210:23 | partial 112:18 | pending 56:1 96:20 | photographs 203:5 | +| 112:4 117:7 127:6 | packets 55:2 | 125:16 | 98:2 110:4 191:4 | phrase 126:13 | +| 127:13 132:1 | | participant 65:5 | 191:23 218:15 | phrased 51:20 | +| 135:1,14 147:23 | 7:8 8:2,7,8 61:22 | 67:5 156:2 | Pennington 36:10 | 222:4,15 225:18 | +| 162:4 169:24 | 63:9,17 68:7,9 | participate 155:11 | 48:14 | pick 56:1 | +| 179:24 192:16 | 68:19 138:14 | participated 173:13 | people 14:23 18:24 | picking 212:9 | +| 221:19,22 225:15 | 153:24 168:19 | participating | 71:10 130:11 | picture 42:10 | +| 228:2 235:25 | 169:10 217:7 | 157:14 | 198:1 201:1 | pictures 166:2 | +| 236:14 | 222:11 223:23 | particular 40:3 | 212:22 217:1 | pilot 70:19 71:14 | +| ordered 214:20 | paid 87:10 145:6 | 56:13 64:15 | perceive 79:9 | pilots 66:25 70:18 | +| 216:9,13 | 156:20,22 180:9 | 127:22 128:19 | perceived 129:8 | 70:19 181:1 | +| ordering 216:12 | Palm 1:2,17,22,23 | 154:6 155:5 | percent 103:12 | 208:20 | +| orders 99:9 146:8 | 1:23 2:3,4,8,8,13 | 158:19,22 159:17 | perceptions 127:1 | pilots' 71:2 | +| 201:22 236:10 | 95:2,17,22,23,23 | 179:22 190:18 | 127:15 | Pinto 199:9 | +| original 5:21,22 | 168:17 171:20 | 203:1 212:13 | period 111:3 112:10 | place 1:17,19 24:5 | +| 6:14 7:16 16:7,13 | 173:25 197:24 | 221:1 234:18 | 129:1,11 182:14 | 49:6 54:18,20 | +| 42:8,16,17,18,21 | 204:8 205:16 | particularly 36:8 | 216:14 224:24,24 | 56:1 69:8 70:4,9 | +| 43:24 44:2 63:20 | 206:16 209:25 | 53:11 80:5 101:14 | periodicals 194:7 | 71:12,23 80:2 | +| 73:5 74:3,13 | 211:14 217:17,19 | 171:9 178:10 | periods 131:23 | 95:17,19 98:12 | +| 75:15 82:14,21 | 218:1,19 231:21 | 202:13 205:9,10 | 132:4 | 107:3 174:11 | +| 87:14 146:23 | 238:5 | 220:16 | permission 104:20 | 183:4,19 | +| 173:11 193:24 | paper 223:12 | parties 4:22 9:12 | permits 79:16 | places 63:16 100:3 | +| 226:24 | papers 83:10 113:2 | 54:4 71:7 73:23 | permitted 83:4 | plain 38:8 | +| originate 194:4 | 126:19 | 88:12 90:6 93:4 | 84:23 182:22 | plaintiff 3:15 16:8 | +| ought 187:5 221:21 | parade 157:4 | 106:15 108:7 | 219:16 | 26:1 27:15,16 | +| 223:10 | parading 151:10 | 147:23 148:1 | person 36:3 87:1 | 36:4 42:23 44:1 | +| outcome 101:19 | paragraph 15:10 | 164:8 208:22 | 94:15 137:15,16 | 44:22,23 48:17 | +| 121:3 | 68:13,24 69:3,19 | partner 75:22 | 137:19,24,24 | 50:15 87:14 110:6 | +| outlined 134:17 | 115:23 | parts 98:18 | 142:11 155:20 | 110:12 124:15 | +| outside 37:19 79:7 | | | | | + +| 129:10 184:6
219:24 | 178:1 187:23
plight 77:11 | possible 101:19
162:1 | prepared 48:3
55:24 56:6,15
57:15 58:1 92:2
92:18 94:5 169:8
195:19,23 | privilege 4:11 5:4
6:11 9:5 11:11,18
12:24 13:23 14:11
14:25 15:7,12,15
16:2,20 22:16,23
25:7,13 37:5
42:14 47:11 87:25
88:9 90:5,12,18
90:20 119:5,9
120:21 126:24
147:21 | | +|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| plaintiff's 138:8
151:24 | plural 216:19
plus 5:7 19:16
point 9:8,8 33:21
40:15 58:14 59:17
61:2 87:18 102:17
103:11 112:17,25
113:7 114:6
119:12 122:16
127:25 132:7
152:20 154:17
158:24 161:10
166:11 167:5
176:3 184:9
194:17 198:9,16
200:17 208:4
236:12 | potentialities 101:8
potentiality 100:24
potentially 34:5
78:3 80:22 97:4
132:3 153:6
160:21 220:5
221:16 | preparedness 168:3
preparing 22:7
presence 79:7 148:9
present 16:8 42:15
42:22 55:1,19
72:2 93:21 131:3
224:16
presentation 13:2
30:12 47:4 72:22
177:12
presentations 126:6
presented 28:12
55:2 133:23
presentence 177:7
preserve 108:15
Presiding 1:18
95:18
press 37:9,10 39:7,8
39:10,25 40:4
77:9 108:7
presumably 33:17
50:25 116:5
presume 11:1 56:17
56:22 119:13
161:4,5 163:5,17
165:1,7,9 189:13
205:19
presumed 22:17
49:18
presumption 23:1
pretenses 86:16
pretrial 60:8
pretty 236:2
prevalent 36:18
prevents 98:12
previously 19:15
65:10
primarily 50:2 69:2
88:19 130:5
prime 71:15
Prince 231:11
principle 73:12
206:17
print 45:20 50:24
prior 81:6 97:1
132:7 157:11
171:10 175:15
207:17 213:15
216:23 218:20
228:5
priority 211:13
privacy 149:13
private 19:19 20:1
21:21 69:7 | pro 190:25
probable 6:12,14
9:23 16:13 22:24
26:12 31:13,17,21
40:24 41:6,21
43:6,11 45:9,11
46:2,4,7,9,12,14
67:15 74:23 90:16
90:25 91:1 138:24
139:14,18 140:1
143:1 145:17,20
146:4 151:5,11
152:15 153:13
155:14,24 170:2
172:25 173:7,11
173:16 185:1
191:8 194:4
195:19,22 209:23
probably 92:19
168:8 169:15,18
195:4 223:22
230:25,25
probation 150:4,7
150:10 151:17
152:8 159:19
201:25
probative 77:3
78:13 114:9 151:9
159:10 178:3
196:17 233:11
problem 57:18
61:14 149:1
220:13
procedural 61:18
127:23
procedurally 99:18
106:21 114:22
procedure 172:8
175:16
procedures 24:4,24
proceed 39:20 48:5
54:11 60:14 96:17
96:24 160:24
proceeding 5:8,22
5:22,23 6:14 7:12
7:17 9:18,23 | | +| Plaintiff/Counter
2:2 | point 9:8,8 33:21
40:15 58:14 59:17
61:2 87:18 102:17
103:11 112:17,25
113:7 114:6
119:12 122:16
127:25 132:7
152:20 154:17
158:24 161:10
166:11 167:5
176:3 184:9
194:17 198:9,16
200:17 208:4
236:12 | pointed 14:8 40:25
41:4 50:19 59:19
79:5 117:13
120:11 131:13
143:8 144:13
161:20 184:11
219:22 | possible 101:19
162:1
possibly 14:16 69:9
84:22 87:8
Post 232:6
potential 28:3 78:5
100:1 101:11,12
108:10 122:9,25
123:2 130:4,7,15
131:6 174:9 191:6
210:13
potentialities 101:8
potentiality 100:24
potentially 34:5
78:3 80:22 97:4
132:3 153:6
160:21 220:5
221:16
practice 110:6
172:1,2
practiced 173:3
practitioner 112:21
182:13 183:14
praise 134:13
pre-existing 152:5
precedent 27:19
preceding 15:10
precise 175:4
precisely 37:13-56:2
preclude 193:15
precluded 77:1
precludes 16:17
predator 232:7
predicate 23:24
58:8
prediction 121:14
preference 102:22
prejudice 13:24
15:1 78:15 81:4
113:6 114:3,8,14
114:15 123:13
124:10 151:13
196:18 219:8
233:13
prejudicial 77:4
82:7 133:1 153:25
162:17 167:16
175:11 196:7
231:13 233:21
prejudicing 82:8
preliminarily
199:24 200:22
preliminary 58:6
premium 156:25
157:1
preparation 196:1
198:23
prepare 92:10
135:1 236:10,13 | prepared 48:3
55:24 56:6,15
57:15 58:1 92:2
92:18 94:5 169:8
195:19,23
195:19,23
preparedness 168:3
preparing 22:7
presence 79:7 148:9
present 16:8 42:15
42:22 55:1,19
72:2 93:21 131:3
224:16
presentation 13:2
30:12 47:4 72:22
177:12
presentations 126:6
presented 28:12
55:2 133:23
presentence 177:7
preserve 108:15
Presiding 1:18
95:18
press 37:9,10 39:7,8
39:10,25 40:4
77:9 108:7
presumably 33:17
50:25 116:5
presume 11:1 56:17
56:22 119:13
161:4,5 163:5,17
165:1,7,9 189:13
205:19
presumed 22:17
49:18
presumption 23:1
pretenses 86:16
pretrial 60:8
pretty 236:2
prevalent 36:18
prevents 98:12
previously 19:15
65:10
primarily 50:2 69:2
88:19 130:5
prime 71:15
Prince 231:11
principle 73:12
206:17
print 45:20 50:24
prior 81:6 97:1
132:7 157:11
171:10 175:15
207:17 213:15
216:23 218:20
228:5
priority 211:13
privacy 149:13
private 19:19 20:1
21:21 69:7 | privilege 4:11 5:4
6:11 9:5 11:11,18
12:24 13:23 14:11
14:25 15:7,12,15
16:2,20 22:16,23
25:7,13 37:5
42:14 47:11 87:25
88:9 90:5,12,18
90:20 119:5,9
120:21 126:24
147:21
privileges 109:9
110:17 114:25
pro 190:25
probable 6:12,14
9:23 16:13 22:24
26:12 31:13,17,21
40:24 41:6,21
43:6,11 45:9,11
46:2,4,7,9,12,14
67:15 74:23 90:16
90:25 91:1 138:24
139:14,18 140:1
143:1 145:17,20
146:4 151:5,11
152:15 153:13
155:14,24 170:2
172:25 173:7,11
173:16 185:1
191:8 194:4
195:19,22 209:23
probably 92:19
168:8 169:15,18
195:4 223:22
230:25,25
probation 150:4,7
150:10 151:17
152:8 159:19
201:25
probative 77:3
78:13 114:9 151:9
159:10 178:3
196:17 233:11
problem 57:18
61:14 149:1
220:13
procedural 61:18
127:23
procedurally 99:18
106:21 114:22
procedure 172:8
175:16
procedures 24:4,24
proceed 39:20 48:5
54:11 60:14 96:17
96:24 160:24
proceeding 5:8,22
5:22,23 6:14 7:12
7:17 9:18,23 | + +| 11:17 16:8,13 | 88:22 154:21 | protected 5:12 6:10 | pulled 167:15 | 79:10 120:14 | +|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|------------------------| +| 19:22,23 42:5,8 | properties 162:25 | 7:2 9:4 11:16 | pulls 74:2 167:11 | 138:6 147:22 | +| 42:16,17,19,22 | 180:23 195:16 | 12:23 25:2 42:13 | pump 71:16 | 163:25 186:3 | +| 43:8,25 44:2 45:5 | property 212:1,2 | 47:21,24 88:8 | pumping 71:4 | 234:1 235:2,22 | +| 46:3,5,6 73:5 74:3 | 218:1 | 90:12,17 | punitive 24:7,15 | 236:13 | +| 74:13 75:15,18 | propose 55:10 | protecting 18:25 | 25:3 33:13 41:8 | quickly 55:9 60:22 | +| 82:15 117:21,23 | proposed 28:5 51:1 | 24:21 36:16 | 47:9 49:18 52:6 | 154:5 | +| 120:6 131:16 | 57:12 | protection 10:25 | 52:17 163:6 165:2 | quite 31:15 35:4 | +| 138:1 139:1 | proposition 18:18 | protections 24:19 | 194:24 195:5 | 79:21 82:9 108:24 | +| 142:12 146:23 | 19:6 23:23 24:2 | 214:10 | 200:2 202:23,25 | 115:14 117:10 | +| 173:12 193:25 | proprietary 155:6 | protective 235:25 | 205:14,25 232:21 | 165:11 | +| 194:5 226:24 | prosecute 17:19 | protects 15:12 | 234:14 | quote 44:20 48:23 | +| 229:19 | prosecuted 6:24 | protocol 127:23 | purchased 196:9 | 48:24 50:10 69:3 | +| proceedings 1:14,20 | 192:10 219:3 | prove 16:14 22:24 | pure 178:24 | 70:9 71:7,18 | +| 11:15 21:22,23 | 230:20 | 22:25 26:13 31:11 | purportedly 69:10 | 117:18 126:22 | +| 24:9 74:1 87:2 | prosecuting 190:15 | 31:17,22,24 34:1 | purpose 11:22 59:5 | 127:3,4,11,14 | +| 95:14,20 96:19 | 190:24 208:11 | 66:2,19 73:4 74:6 | 72:10 149:8 | quoted 76:10 | +| 116:21 124:14 | prosecution 4:12 | 82:13,20 84:10,12 | purposefully 81:15 | quotes 71:4 232:9 | +| 131:19 237:5 | 5:5,6 7:6,14 8:18 | 84:14,24 136:19 | purposes 20:17 | quoting 127:7 | +| 238:9 | 10:9 11:13,19,23 | 139:19,24 142:3 | 25:25 53:21 57:5 | | +| process 11:10 24:6 | 12:4,21 13:5,13 | 146:3 147:6 | 58:13 66:1,10,21 | R | +| 52:16,18 58:4 | 16:21 17:11,14,25 | 150:15 153:12 | 71:3 97:20 131:1 | R 197:15 216:25 | +| 67:17 77:20 87:7 | 18:7,15,23 19:4 | 175:24 232:15,18 | 148:14 232:20 | 217:8 | +| 89:15 99:5 209:19 | 21:13 22:19,22 | 232:19 233:2,17 | pursuant 72:4 | R-E-C-A-R-E-Y | +| procuring 177:4 | 23:7 25:9,14,25 | proven 130:21 | 182:21 189:24 | 218:21 | +| 179:11 | 26:3,19 30:7 | proverbial 107:2 | 228:2 | radar 37:24 | +| produce 117:7 | 32:25 34:2 40:21 | provide 23:24 52:4 | pursue 79:23 | raiding 129:2 | +| 214:20 223:7 | 42:4 44:9,19 51:7 | 104:24 206:6 | pursued 69:25 | raise 10:6 14:14,15 | +| 225:22 | 51:24 64:21 73:1 | provided 55:5 64:12 | pursuing 152:25 | 18:8 19:15 24:11 | +| produced 81:25 | 73:7 74:8 75:12 | 126:9,10 198:20 | pushed 93:6 | 26:24 78:16 87:18 | +| 153:22 161:4 | 78:1 80:10,18 | 199:14 204:7 | put 3:17 8:13,25 9:2 | 233:10 | +| 162:2,3 163:3,5 | 82:11 86:20,22 | 219:9 220:1 221:7 | 24:5 30:3 39:2,4,8 | raised 14:3 230:6 | +| 165:7 175:4 193:6 | 87:14 98:14 99:2 | provides 12:16 | 39:24 94:4 97:8 | 233:10,11 | +| 193:9 211:12 | 100:24 115:7 | proving 23:19 31:12 | 107:2 110:1 124:6 | ramifications 123:1 | +| 214:14,15,19 | 116:6 118:11 | 118:5 | 138:22 139:11 | 123:2 174:9,9 | +| 216:6,8,10,13 | 122:10 123:9 | provision 230:8 | 145:10,10 181:24 | rare 130:12 | +| 217:22,23 218:19 | 130:17 131:7 | provisions 146:11 | 187:19 | rarely 148:19 | +| 226:3,11 227:16 | 140:13 143:21 | proviso 161:18 | puts 37:7 94:7 | rash 154:19 | +| 228:1,5,8 229:3 | 144:3 145:18 | PSI 177:7 | putting 16:22 40:2 | rate 166:9 | +| 231:7 | 151:7 165:14 | psychiatric 223:16 | puzzled 82:19,24 | Razorback 76:8 | +| production 189:5 | 169:17 172:5,19 | 223:18 | | re-evaluated 131:18 | +| 214:7 228:7 230:7 | 179:17 180:16 | psychological 197:7 | Q | re-examine 161:18 | +| 230:22 | 185:22 190:13,23 | 197:20 | qualified 22:15,22 | re-produce 229:10 | +| professional 20:6,15 | 194:12 196:11 | public 19:14,23 | quality 206:21 | re-produced 229:8 | +| 20:16 | 213:9 220:18,20 | 20:3,8,11 21:7,15 | quasi- 37:6 | reaction 185:19 | +| professor 191:2 | 220:24 227:22 | 21:18,25,25 22:1 | quasi-public 38:21 | read 5:24 33:20 | +| project 199:12 | 220:24 227:22 | 22:10,14,15 36:22 | 39:23 | 45:15 46:24 51:1 | +| prolong 133:14 | 121:11 191:6 | 37:7 38:3 39:4 | question 18:3 30:4 | 56:7,9 69:17 | +| promote 39:12 | 121:11 191:6 | 40:9 49:7 124:1 | 40:19 41:5,25 | 76:11 87:22 113:2 | +| prong 100:6 | prosecutor 17:19 | public's 100:18 | 60:20 70:21 74:17 | 126:17 137:4,5 | +| pronouncements 102:3 | prosecutorial 191:20 | publication 17:1,3 | 74:19 78:16 81:5 | 145:23 154:15 | +| proof 15:18 21:2,8 | 191:20 | 26:8 44:10 89:1 | 84:3 87:17 105:23 | 199:13 | +| 21:11 123:16,19 | prostitute 145:14 | publications 193:4 | 109:19 116:19 | reading 6:20 28:1 | +| 123:22 142:1 | prostituting 176:18 | 194:20 | 137:10 168:6 | 51:10 68:15 138:2 | +| 143:20 145:3 | prostitution 66:1,10 | publicity 21:24 34:8 | 169:3 183:6 198:3 | 206:15 | +| propensity 150:16 | 66:21 176:19,22 | published 9:17,20 | 206:22 235:20 | ready 3:10,12 54:11 | +| propensity 150:16 | 177:3,5 179:12 | 73:25 108:8 | questions 34:17 | 54:12 96:16,17 | +| properly 22:7,8 | protect 7:21 11:5 | Pucillo 175:9 | 54:17,20 55:8,10 | reaffirmed 5:7 | +| | 24:5 90:5 197:11 | Pucillo's 179:4 | 55:12 71:1 79:10 | real 37:25 87:15 | + +| 159:9 | recognize 59:24 | reflects 176:11 | 153:7 158:25 | 147:22 170:1 | +|----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|---------------------| +| realized 122:25 | 131:6 234:16 | 196:7 | 163:6 175:6 179:5 | 213:20 | +| really 5:2,19 7:13 | recognized 9:11 | refreshing 212:23 | 184:19 195:24 | relying 75:1 | +| 36:19,23 37:18 | 15:14 41:10 | refuse 120:14 | 198:21 213:23 | remain 59:1 | +| 43:22 60:19 72:21 | 117:19 122:9 | refuses 178:13 | 214:2 220:20 | remains 15:20 | +| 87:18 148:3 174:2 | recollection 112:6 | regard 53:25 57:11 | relating 70:22 77:11 | 230:9 | +| 175:5 179:23 | 177:15 | 60:22 61:9 65:21 | 196:1,3 213:17 | remedies 52:3 111:8 | +| 183:23 184:3,15 | recommended 60:15 | 67:13 72:11 79:17 | relation 60:13 151:2 | 128:17 | +| 198:18 236:13 | recommended 60:15 | 118:21,22,24 | relationship 20:16 | remedy 98:7 111:6 | +| reargue 32:11 | recompense 113:16 | 120:9 141:12 | 48:9 83:1 134:1 | 222:18 | +| reasked 131:18 | reconstitute 49:23 | 147:2,4 148:11 | relationships 17:8 | remember 175:21 | +| reason 3:21 10:5 | reconvene 235:16 | 159:25 164:3,7 | relatively 112:10 | 176:20 178:8 | +| 29:11 31:24 49:13 | record 11:6 39:16 | 166:10 190:9 | releases 37:9 39:10 | 235:19 236:2 | +| 52:23 56:19 65:15 | 91:10,11 97:8,20 | 191:21,23 198:14 | relentlessly 69:24 | Remind 69:13 | +| 65:22 99:22 | 98:10 104:4 105:4 | 206:18,20 207:4 | relevance 64:17,19 | remiss 99:13 | +| 130:10 154:9 | 105:8 111:13,21 | 209:20 211:1 | 71:17 82:4,9 | remote 77:3 82:4 | +| 161:11 180:18 | 119:7 131:25 | 213:13,20 221:14 | 165:13 166:10 | 151:8 | +| 198:20 223:11 | 134:20 135:8,22 | 225:21 228:10 | 189:15,22 192:2 | remotely 209:3 | +| reasonable 65:11 | 135:23,24 154:3,4 | 230:12 231:9 | 196:19 197:20 | removed 132:10 | +| 72:3 87:1 116:14 | 172:9,10 175:1 | 234:5,7 | 198:7 199:13 | Rent 211:17 | +| 121:15 125:17,20 | 176:10,11 179:6 | regarding 35:23 | 208:3 211:17 | rental 211:5,9,9,10 | +| 129:8 137:15,16 | 186:17 202:8 | 53:19 70:1 81:5 | 212:13 231:12 | repeat 168:23 | +| 137:23 141:3 | 205:12 209:13,14 | 153:10,11 169:4 | 233:10 | repeated 31:14 | +| 145:25 148:7 | 214:24 238:10 | 195:21 201:23 | relevancy 77:12,15 | repeatedly 31:10 | +| 149:3 155:20 | records 81:21,24 | 203:7 212:8 218:7 | 149:12 175:23 | 84:21 120:11 | +| 173:12 183:11 | 82:3,10 136:15 | 231:25 234:3 | 181:3 192:17 | 123:25 | +| reasonableness | 146:15,18,25 | registration 177:10 | 203:10 206:5 | repetition 47:1 | +| 155:6 | 147:9,24 149:7,12 | 202:12,20 | 224:2 | report 51:2 193:10 | +| reasonably 72:6 | 149:22 156:6,9 | registrations 164:12 | relevant 8:18 22:2 | 193:13 194:9,23 | +| 74:12 117:14 | 159:8 160:6 162:8 | 202:1,10 | 72:9 78:7 80:18 | 197:4,20,25 212:8 | +| 118:2,6,22 120:20 | 162:10,25 163:1 | rehab 224:8 | 82:2 85:14 89:1 | 216:16 218:2 | +| 160:14 169:25 | 184:18 185:6 | rehabilitation 223:18 | 116:15 141:10 | 238:8 | +| 196:15 225:13 | 216:19 217:17,19 | reintroduce 136:4 | 147:10 150:24 | reported 1:20 71:8 | +| reasons 14:18 59:17 | 218:13 223:15,16 | Reiter 205:16 | 151:8 152:3,7 | 95:20 156:15 | +| 101:15 124:18,19 | 227:15 228:8,17 | 209:18 215:21 | 153:1 154:10 | reporter 89:17 | +| 134:19 135:8 | 228:23 229:3 | reiterate 124:25 | 158:17 159:5 | 105:6 235:12 | +| 160:19,20 176:23 | recover 49:18 | reiterated 128:11 | 160:1,14 162:17 | reporting 1:22 | +| 191:9,10 202:7 | red 75:2 | reiterating 131:25 | 164:21 170:15 | 95:22 97:15,22 | +| 204:10 209:6 | redress 48:12,24 | reiterating 131:25 | 174:12 176:5 | represent 38:20 | +| 210:5 214:23 | redressable 36:7 | reject 140:25 | 178:16 189:16 | 39:5 187:21 | +| 218:16 | reduce 191:3 | rejected 17:13 | 194:11 195:24 | representation 34:8 | +| rebut 47:2 115:4 | █ 26:18 | rejecting 141:11 | 201:6 205:7 207:3 | 34:9 80:6 | +| rebuts 67:1 | Reed's 197:4 | relate 154:2,7 | 209:1,4 219:24 | represented 38:25 | +| rebuttal 13:19 | refer 8:8 | 173:23 199:21 | 220:6,19,22 | 53:18 54:25 128:5 | +| 93:22 122:23 | reference 57:16,19 | 207:21 | 221:16 223:24 | 154:9 159:18 | +| recall 69:21 195:10 | 70:14 99:25 | related 18:2 21:23 | 224:9 227:10,12 | 180:4 198:22 | +| Recarey 218:21 | 148:15 215:20 | 34:21 70:23 75:10 | 234:14 | representing 12:12 | +| receive 151:14 | referenced 53:12 | 80:23 98:15 | reliance 18:10 | 19:19 20:1 21:22 | +| received 55:23 94:6 | 57:14 66:13 150:9 | 138:13 151:5 | relied 26:16 41:11 | 38:11 39:13,22 | +| 167:19 217:16 | 157:11 169:15 | 153:17 162:5 | 74:12,20,25 75:14 | 40:6 77:21 | +| 218:7 227:24 | references 69:20 | 163:1 175:3 | 76:11 142:11,16 | represents 37:15 | +| receiving 123:25 | referred 79:14 | 179:16 193:4 | 142:18,22,25 | reproduce 229:11 | +| recess 61:17 94:21 | 97:13 104:4 | 194:20 205:13 | 146:22 152:24 | reproduction | +| recitation 52:7 54:2 | referring 150:18 | 210:15 211:4 | 193:24 194:1 | 229:13 | +| recited 103:1 | refers 115:23 | 212:1 217:17 | relies 50:2 | reputation 6:8 | +| reckless 49:22 | reflect 165:17 172:9 | 218:4 | reluctant 136:3 | 18:13,25 39:3 | +| recognition 61:4 | reflected 230:17 | relates 35:1 48:21 | reluctantly 59:8 | request 56:21 57:1 | +| 123:7 128:16 | reflection 171:25 | 51:12 52:6 73:15 | rely 22:3 23:23 49:8 | 105:24 106:8,8 | +| 130:3,15 | reflective 206:20 | 144:7 152:18 | 107:23 142:17,20 | 228:7 233:23 | + +| requested 131:23
132:2 164:4 | responsible 92:6
rest 148:21 181:24
192:1 198:24 | 222:8
risk 191:16
road 45:13 | 33:16 75:20 89:23
128:25 173:14
183:5 194:2 | 73:4 91:6 136:9
143:18 183:3
184:5 185:2,7,8,9
187:25 198:17
220:12 224:11 | | +|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| requests 163:21,23
189:4,5,24 | restrictions 50:18
rests 115:21 | roadmap 4:16 5:1
8:21 15:4,5,25 | rough 182:10
round 35:12 | says 6:13 7:13 13:4
16:6 18:6,22
20:25 21:13 23:21
41:16 43:3 44:14
69:2,3 74:8 87:2
88:5 89:17,22,24
116:22 125:10
126:22 143:10,11 | | +| require 14:16
111:15 172:4 | result 18:13 21:1
33:17 34:19 38:23 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach 2:3,4
30:19,21 55:13,16
62:2,4,9,23 63:4
63:19 64:8 69:14
72:18,21 81:22
83:10 88:3,6
92:20 146:16,20
149:16,20 150:6
152:11,15 153:20
154:5 160:25
161:22 162:13,20
163:3,9,19 165:6
166:17,20,22,25
167:6,20 168:17
170:24 171:12,17
171:25 172:7,23
174:22 175:2
188:12,15,23
189:8,12 193:5,12
196:6 197:6,12,19
198:11 199:11
200:6,10 202:4
204:6,14,17
205:20 206:10
207:15 209:1,11
209:21 210:22
211:3,7 212:19
214:5,13 216:5,25
217:3,5,20 221:10
226:12,18 227:25
229:15 231:12
233:8,9 235:10 | RRA 70:24 71:17
213:11,16
RRA's 71:12
rule 17:1 48:3 66:12
79:15,15 86:7
202:5 218:24
220:14 233:6
234:10
ruled 86:1 106:1
167:7 209:6 218:5
rules 52:11 208:2
ruling 54:8 57:24
61:2 78:12,20
81:17 84:1,9 86:8
106:13 122:22
149:2,19 150:1,3
151:1,22 152:10
154:16 161:6,7,21
164:23 166:21,22
168:21 171:3
179:22 183:24
192:20,24 195:21
197:21 198:14,17
199:8,19 200:24
203:6 205:5
210:11,25 211:22
211:25 212:4,7,11
212:14 213:1
215:2,5,8 216:16
217:10,11,12,15
217:24 218:2,9,22
222:20,25 223:2,3
231:8,20,23
rulings 236:15
run 116:18 | says 6:13 7:13 13:4
16:6 18:6,22
20:25 21:13 23:21
41:16 43:3 44:14
69:2,3 74:8 87:2
88:5 89:17,22,24
116:22 125:10
126:22 143:10,11
145:5 150:20
165:8 184:9
211:15 216:18
Scalia 22:20
scam 70:8 173:14
Scarola 2:7,9 3:6
4:1 6:17 11:12,21
30:13,17,18,22
31:1,8 32:14,16
32:19 33:3,8
39:15,19 40:15
44:6 45:7 46:1,11
47:15 54:11 55:17
57:2 61:18,21
62:3,6,18,24
63:22 64:5,13
65:1,2 67:24 68:2
68:4,25 69:19
70:12 71:19 72:17
73:3,22 74:2 75:4
76:22 78:16,19
79:12,25 80:25
81:25 82:10,18
84:2,7,18 85:8,23
87:19 90:3,13
93:18 96:4 97:1
97:19,25 99:25
102:18,20 103:20
104:16 110:19
113:18 114:25
115:5,6,14 118:15
118:18 119:17,25
122:4 123:11
124:21 125:10
128:11 131:13
134:25 135:6,13
142:2,19 145:7
146:24 147:1
148:22 149:24
150:9,18 151:16
151:19 152:20
153:23 155:1,2
160:8 161:10
162:11 163:8,14
163:20 164:11,22
165:3,17 169:12 | | +| requested 131:23
132:2 164:4 | responsible 92:6
rest 148:21 181:24
192:1 198:24 | 222:8
risk 191:16
road 45:13 | 33:16 75:20 89:23
128:25 173:14
183:5 194:2 | | | +| requests 163:21,23
189:4,5,24 | restrictions 50:18
rests 115:21 | roadmap 4:16 5:1
8:21 15:4,5,25 | rough 182:10
round 35:12 | | | +| require 14:16
111:15 172:4 | result 18:13 21:1
33:17 34:19 38:23 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach 2:3,4
30:19,21 55:13,16
62:2,4,9,23 63:4
63:19 64:8 69:14
72:18,21 81:22
83:10 88:3,6
92:20 146:16,20
149:16,20 150:6
152:11,15 153:20
154:5 160:25
161:22 162:13,20
163:3,9,19 165:6
166:17,20,22,25
167:6,20 168:17
170:24 171:12,17
171:25 172:7,23
174:22 175:2
188:12,15,23
189:8,12 193:5,12
196:6 197:6,12,19
198:11 199:11
200:6,10 202:4
204:6,14,17
205:20 206:10
207:15 209:1,11
209:21 210:22
211:3,7 212:19
214:5,13 216:5,25
217:3,5,20 221:10
226:12,18 227:25
229:15 231:12
233:8,9 235:10 | RRA 70:24 71:17
213:11,16
RRA's 71:12
rule 17:1 48:3 66:12
79:15,15 86:7
202:5 218:24
220:14 233:6
234:10
ruled 86:1 106:1
167:7 209:6 218:5
rules 52:11 208:2
ruling 54:8 57:24
61:2 78:12,20
81:17 84:1,9 86:8
106:13 122:22
149:2,19 150:1,3
151:1,22 152:10
154:16 161:6,7,21
164:23 166:21,22
168:21 171:3
179:22 183:24
192:20,24 195:21
197:21 198:14,17
199:8,19 200:24
203:6 205:5
210:11,25 211:22
211:25 212:4,7,11
212:14 213:1
215:2,5,8 216:16
217:10,11,12,15
217:24 218:2,9,22
222:20,25 223:2,3
231:8,20,23
rulings 236:15
run 116:18 | | | +| requested 131:23
132:2 164:4 | responsible 92:6
rest 148:21 181:24
192:1 198:24 | 222:8
risk 191:16
road 45:13 | | | | +| requests 163:21,23
189:4,5,24 | restrictions 50:18
rests 115:21 | roadmap 4:16 5:1
8:21 15:4,5,25 | rough 182:10
round 35:12 | | | +| require 14:16
111:15 172:4 | result 18:13 21:1
33:17 34:19 38:23 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach 2:3,4
30:19,21 55:13,16
62:2,4,9,23 63:4
63:19 64:8 69:14
72:18,21 81:22
83:10 88:3,6
92:20 146:16,20
149:16,20 150:6
152:11,15 153:20
154:5 160:25
161:22 162:13,20
163:3,9,19 165:6
166:17,20,22,25
167:6,20 168:17
170:24 171:12,17
171:25 172:7,23
174:22 175:2
188:12,15,23
189:8,12 193:5,12
196:6 197:6,12,19
198:11 199:11
200:6,10 202:4
204:6,14,17
205:20 206:10
207:15 209:1,11
209:21 210:22
211:3,7 212:19
214:5,13 216:5,25
217:3,5,20 221:10
226:12,18 227:25
229:15 231:12
233:8,9 235:10 | RRA 70:24 71:17
213:11,16
RRA's 71:12
rule 17:1 48:3 66:12
79:15,15 86:7
202:5 218:24
220:14 233:6
234:10
ruled 86:1 106:1
167:7 209:6 218:5
rules 52:11 208:2
ruling 54:8 57:24
61:2 78:12,20
81:17 84:1,9 86:8
106:13 122:22
149:2,19 150:1,3
151:1,22 152:10
154:16 161:6,7,21
164:23 166:21,22
168:21 171:3
179:22 183:24
192:20,24 195:21
197:21 198:14,17
199:8,19 200:24
203:6 205:5
210:11,25 211:22
211:25 212:4,7,11
212:14 213:1
215:2,5,8 216:16
217:10,11,12,15
217:24 218:2,9,22
222:20,25 223:2,3
231:8,20,23
rulings 236:15
run 116:18 | | | +| requested 131:23
132:2 164:4 | responsible 92:6
rest 148:21 181:24
192:1 198:24 | 222:8
risk 191:16
road 45:13 | | | | +| requests 163:21,23
189:4,5,24 | restrictions 50:18
rests 115:21 | roadmap 4:16 5:1
8:21 15:4,5,25 | rough 182:10
round 35:12 | | | +| require 14:16
111:15 172:4 | result 18:13 21:1
33:17 34:19 38:23 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach 2:3,4
30:19,21 55:13,16
62:2,4,9,23 63:4
63:19 64:8 69:14
72:18,21 81:22
83:10 88:3,6
92:20 146:16,20
149:16,20 150:6
152:11,15 153:20
154:5 160:25
161:22 162:13,20
163:3,9,19 165:6
166:17,20,22,25
167:6,20 168:17
170:24 171:12,17
171:25 172:7,23
174:22 175:2
188:12,15,23
189:8,12 193:5,12
196:6 197:6,12,19
198:11 199:11
200:6,10 202:4
204:6,14,17
205:20 206:10
207:15 209:1,11
209:21 210:22
211:3,7 212:19
214:5,13 216:5,25
217:3,5,20 221:10
226:12,18 227:25
229:15 231:12
233:8,9 235:10 | RRA 70:24 71:17
213:11,16
RRA's 71:12
rule 17:1 48:3 66:12
79:15,15 86:7
202:5 218:24
220:14 233:6
234:10
ruled 86:1 106:1
167:7 209:6 218:5
rules 52:11 208:2
ruling 54:8 57:24
61:2 78:12,20
81:17 84:1,9 86:8
106:13 122:22
149:2,19 150:1,3
151:1,22 152:10
154:16 161:6,7,21
164:23 166:21,22
168:21 171:3
179:22 183:24
192:20,24 195:21
197:21 198:14,17
199:8,19 200:24
203:6 205:5
210:11,25 211:22
211:25 212:4,7,11
212:14 213:1
215:2,5,8 216:16
217:10,11,12,15
217:24 218:2,9,22
222:20,25 223:2,3
231:8,20,23
rulings 236:15
run 116:18 | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91:7,15 93:3 94:3
94:13 100:16
101:21 141:1
155:4 222:20 | rock 107:3
Rockenbach's
56:11
Rodriguez 231:7
role 190:17
roll 110:20
room 1:17 58:21
90:10 95:17
Rosenfeldt 65:8
116:4
Rothstein 1:8 34:20
37:20 50:25 51:14
53:20 65:5,8 69:2
69:4,16 70:4
75:19,25 76:12
80:21 83:18 95:8
116:4 122:13,20
128:7,8,13 139:11
183:20 200:8
205:11 229:19,22 | | | | +| respectfully 58:2
109:1 119:6 | respect 54:14 85:7
91 | | | | | + +| 169:13 170:17 | 181:14,17 184:23 | 204:25 | 174:13 199:20 | 128:2 222:18 | +|----------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------| +| 171:11,24 172:18 | seconds 186:18 | services 204:23 | 212:12 | situations 61:6,6 | +| 172:22 176:2,3 | section 49:17 52:15 | servicing 205:2 | showpiece 76:13 | six 44:1 153:23 | +| 177:15,21 178:20 | 62:5 151:2 | serving 37:22 | shows 44:24 45:2 | 159:13,14 218:11 | +| 180:6 181:4 182:8 | see 4:5,25 8:3 34:24 | 182:15 | 152:5 | sixth 19:13 23:24 | +| 186:19 187:3 | 38:8,13 44:10 | set 19:16 50:14 | sic 32:13 97:15 | 36:21 49:2 | +| 189:2,14 190:5,6 | 68:5,18 75:3 | 68:18 86:11 98:25 | side 33:4 47:18 54:9 | Sixty 202:6 | +| 193:6,9 194:13 | 94:19 96:24 | 106:5,22 110:13 | 84:21 93:12 | Sixty-eight 216:1 | +| 197:6 198:2,5,16 | 100:15 118:11 | 110:25 111:10 | 100:13 110:7 | Sixty-nine 205:23 | +| 199:6,15,17 | 134:5 148:19 | 119:1,1,2 121:6 | 119:20 133:3,13 | Sixty-three 202:9 | +| 200:15 201:18 | 149:13 165:12 | 131:19 207:15 | 144:9 213:19 | skills 129:15 | +| 202:2,11 203:8,11 | 167:22 186:15 | 223:14,16 231:2 | 220:2 228:12 | slammed 93:5 | +| 203:15,19,24 | 197:19 206:2 | 234:22,23 | sides 3:9 46:22 | slightly 213:6 | +| 204:4,7 206:3,13 | 209:19 210:14 | sets 5:17 41:8 | 126:5 144:16 | slog 186:5 | +| 207:9 208:10 | 211:9,10 228:4 | setting 14:6 98:8 | sight 106:24 | small 145:11 | +| 210:8,9 211:8,21 | 229:20,23 230:2 | 99:10 111:6 | significance 171:7 | So.3d 4:22 | +| 211:24 212:3,6,10 | 237:2 | 120:24 132:8 | significant 59:8 | sole 182:13 183:14 | +| 212:25 213:6,25 | seeing 111:24 | settle 145:8 | 77:23 108:22 | solely 26:17 53:21 | +| 214:4,17 215:7,11 | seek 29:8 111:6 | settled 73:18 124:16 | 112:2 123:23 | 150:15 | +| 215:19 216:1 | seeking 10:14,21 | 209:3 230:18 | 124:9,12 169:23 | solicitation 177:3 | +| 219:11,14 220:3 | 34:7 40:4 65:7,20 | settlement 229:25 | 192:12 213:8 | soliciting 176:19,21 | +| 220:12 221:11 | 66:19 78:9,22,23 | 230:22 235:9 | significantly 191:24 | somebody 17:16 | +| 222:23 223:1 | 78:23 96:23 98:7 | settlements 230:17 | similar 19:2 34:17 | 191:15 201:3 | +| 225:4 227:3,4,20 | 98:25 99:21 | seven 113:21 159:1 | 52:10 81:6,7 | 219:20 228:19 | +| 228:5,23 230:5 | 100:22 106:19 | 226:6 | 100:12 150:13 | somebody's 184:14 | +| 231:14,15,24 | 111:7 113:1 | Seventeen 166:20 | 159:14 167:7 | somewhat 21:18 | +| 232:9,17 233:25 | 147:17 149:7 | seventh 21:5 23:25 | 189:25 213:4 | 100:12 140:13 | +| 234:25 235:14,19 | 182:24 183:11 | 49:12 | simple 16:18 34:15 | 164:17 | +| 236:9 | 219:25 | sex 202:9,12,20 | 101:25 | son 22:9 92:11 | +| Scarola's 73:14 | seeks 31:10 233:17 | 232:7 | simply 5:2 6:4 15:4 | Sonja 1:22 62:20 | +| 107:6 124:24 | seemingly 22:3 | sex-offender 202:1 | 16:20 20:6 23:20 | 95:22 238:7,16 | +| 136:17 144:21 | seen 35:6 41:18 | sexual 66:2,16,17 | 30:3 39:13,22 | sooner 114:13 | +| 153:11 162:1 | 51:2 178:22 | 69:8 75:5 76:19 | 42:3 48:24 52:24 | sorry 80:25 85:24 | +| 173:1 | 194:15 223:19 | 78:5 79:17 80:4 | 54:2 105:8 121:13 | 89:8 94:12 148:23 | +| schedule 96:13 | sees 47:15 | 154:13 156:22 | 133:5 136:12 | 188:23 198:2,18 | +| scheme 65:5,17 67:5 | segregated 229:5 | 177:11 230:1 | 148:16 152:8 | 206:13 207:8 | +| 83:18 89:24 | self-incrimination | sexually 147:13 | 158:14 172:6 | 210:2 219:11 | +| 155:11 156:2 | 108:16 | Shana 158:20 197:7 | 191:19 203:8 | 222:23 234:9 | +| 183:17 194:3 | sell 71:6 | 197:15,17 216:25 | 221:11,23 | sort 144:20 152:6 | +| Scherer 76:9 | sense 5:3 13:13 | 217:8 | single 13:2,6 17:1,9 | sought 52:5 70:18 | +| school 22:6 157:12 | 27:13,18 46:11 | share 4:14 | 24:14 63:14 158:7 | 71:14 77:19 100:9 | +| 216:19 | 58:3 117:11 141:6 | Shed 211:23 | 158:8,10 183:9 | 148:1 160:19,20 | +| scope 65:6 | 141:21 | sheer 170:18 | singled 190:12,16 | 221:3 224:21 | +| score 201:23 | sent 138:21 226:8 | sheet 201:23 214:22 | sir 3:6,13 10:17 | 228:13 | +| Scott 1:8 2:5 3:15 | 233:24 | Sherman 36:14,16 | 30:17 31:1 84:3 | sound 3:20 104:9 | +| 95:8 | sentence 9:10 37:22 | SHIPLEY 2:7 | 84:18 85:8,23 | sounds 9:6 76:5 | +| scrupulously 33:4 | 98:20 139:23 | shocking 133:10 | 86:6 115:15 | 137:1 162:11,13 | +| sealing 162:4 | 142:14 143:8 | shops 204:21 | 119:17,25 124:20 | 167:2 | +| search 161:1,3,8,16 | 146:2 | short 16:18 221:8 | 143:22 181:2 | source 231:25 | +| 161:24 162:5,6,16 | sentencing 177:8 | 226:9,10 | 188:3 192:13 | sources 169:20 | +| searches 212:2 | separate 63:6 | shorter 118:2 | 200:15 201:19 | South 2:12 37:19 | +| SEARCY 2:7 | 122:14 223:5 | shot 38:16 | 203:15 213:25 | Southern 97:17 | +| season 221:8 | separately 216:9,10 | shouting 17:12 | 223:1 231:15,24 | 98:3,13 120:10,16 | +| SEC 127:4 | separating 140:11 | show 7:23 25:18 | 232:17 235:22 | 121:23 127:6 | +| second 9:10 12:2 | serial 11:16 | 41:21 67:22 143:9 | sit 101:2 | speak 22:6 40:12 | +| 13:23 42:16 43:10 | serve 80:7 174:19 | 166:1 235:1 | site 195:3 | 56:24 59:3 102:20 | +| 46:17 104:19 | served 87:9 98:20 | showed 4:2 69:8 | sitting 58:20 | 150:5 182:8 199:3 | +| 119:12 150:19 | 177:9 | showing 156:11 | situation 107:3 | 231:24 | +| 177:5 179:1 | service 1:22 95:22 | shown 130:21 | 114:11 125:8 | speaker's 232:20 | + +| speaking 58:18 97:9 | 190:6 202:13 | stealing 232:12,24 | subjects 16:4 | suits 18:24 | +|----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------| +| speaks 37:8 49:4 | 207:18,20 208:1 | 233:4 | submissions 229:21 | summary 24:18 | +| special 14:6 | 209:9 221:11 | stems 81:10 | submit 25:9 | 107:14 112:18,21 | +| special-set 231:1 | 232:19 234:12 | stenographic | subpoena 203:14 | 116:25 117:5 | +| specialist 40:3 | 238:4 | 238:10 | subpoenaing | 123:5 125:16 | +| specific 9:16 19:25 | stated 12:22 15:9 | stenographically | 208:21 | 130:22 226:16 | +| 26:3 31:21 55:7 | 23:14 48:12 75:8 | 238:8 | subpoenas 162:7 | summer 112:4 | +| 57:17 62:6 67:19 | 91:8 105:10 | step 48:4 126:19 | 210:24 | superfluous 52:23 | +| 70:14 71:21 84:4 | 134:20 155:17 | 207:4 | subsection 150:19 | superimposes 73:13 | +| 86:18 142:4 | 190:2,4 191:10 | steps 38:22 | 150:20 | supplement 94:9 | +| 145:19 151:15 | 214:23 218:16 | stifle 35:6 | subsequent 81:7 | 155:3 | +| 153:6 177:17 | statement 5:8 6:16 | stipulate 187:8 | 121:10 | support 23:7 29:17 | +| 192:8 219:8 | 24:1 31:14 40:22 | 188:1 | substantial 113:19 | 29:19 39:16 67:14 | +| 222:11 236:17 | 40:23 44:11,12,15 | stipulated 188:4 | 207:10 | 117:8 131:5 135:4 | +| specifically 44:14 | 52:25 54:22 57:19 | stipulation 104:3 | substantially | supported 67:3 | +| 49:5 50:9 54:17 | 73:21 74:6 82:19 | 163:10,15 186:20 | 233:11 | 176:9 195:12 | +| 66:11 69:20 71:22 | 85:16 89:19,21 | 186:24 187:5 | substantively | supporting 65:17 | +| 105:10 125:12 | 126:1 136:18 | 188:9 | 122:16 | supports 119:7 | +| 166:7,8 229:4 | 139:13,25 145:2 | stop 43:15 202:2,4 | successful 114:1 | supposed 132:9 | +| specificity 219:7 | 158:20 178:9 | stopped 45:14 62:10 | sue 11:21 | 142:13,15 | +| specifics 152:9 | 207:25 232:14,18 | storage 204:22 | sued 11:12 21:4 | Supreme 4:8,9,12 | +| specified 24:13 | 233:1 234:8,9,11 | stores 204:21 | 73:18 200:5 | 4:15,17,21,25 5:2 | +| 156:24 | 235:3 | story 160:7 | sues 89:14,15 | 5:7,19,23 6:9 7:1 | +| speech 10:25 215:18 | statements 3:24 | strangely 176:16 | suffered 44:1 | 7:9 8:22 12:22 | +| speeches 40:1 | 5:10,10,11 7:18 | strategic 108:10 | 124:10 185:19 | 15:17 16:19 18:20 | +| spend 192:1 | 8:6,7,8,12,20 9:1 | strategies 108:21 | suffering 114:16 | 22:12 23:14 25:16 | +| spent 14:20 58:22 | 10:12 11:14,22 | strategy 109:2 | sufficiency 28:11,25 | 41:25 42:6 47:9 | +| 72:24 137:5 229:5 | 18:14 20:12 22:17 | stream 124:4 | sufficient 14:18 | 47:25 50:6 87:23 | +| spring 112:4 | 26:6,11 37:2 47:7 | strength 153:8 | 74:23 130:9 | 88:1 127:9 137:4 | +| square 35:12 | 51:13,13 88:10,11 | 158:5 159:23 | 137:14 | 173:19 | +| squarely 13:20 | 88:15 89:13 108:5 | 178:5 | suggest 11:25 55:25 | sure 20:21 28:17 | +| SS 238:4 | 140:5 152:13 | stretch 21:18 | 103:6 119:6 | 32:24 38:18 55:15 | +| stage 221:12 | 153:17 154:1,7 | stricken 197:14 | 131:20 140:10 | 61:14 72:20 82:9 | +| stages 117:13 | 186:4 193:21 | strike 27:10 28:11 | 143:19 145:18 | 86:6 91:15 102:13 | +| 131:16 | 200:1 234:3 | 28:24 29:6 118:10 | 172:10 178:2 | 155:17 167:25 | +| stand 8:19 85:5 | 50:6,10 52:14 | 127:11 193:14 | 191:14 194:15 | 171:11,21,24 | +| 109:13,23 111:17 | 127:8,9 176:25 | 195:7 197:13 | 231:2 | 174:24 182:2 | +| 125:1 145:5 | stating 152:8 | 201:2 218:11 | suggested 38:4 | 184:15 185:24 | +| 175:17 184:3 | status 125:16 | strip 16:24 | 111:25 131:10 | 202:14 203:11 | +| 185:14 220:4 | 176:24 | strippers 185:20 | suggesting 27:25 | 204:16 210:2,23 | +| 222:6 | statute 10:7 17:4 | stripping 157:21 | 67:23 87:22 88:25 | 229:17 233:5 | +| standard 44:7,16 | 79:13 101:3,9 | strong 145:6 157:3 | 101:17 108:1 | 236:11 | +| 137:16 155:14 | 120:5 213:3,18 | struggle 144:20,21 | 122:4 130:10 | surprise 169:8,9 | +| standards 41:9 | statutes 24:21 | student 157:12 | 158:13 220:12 | surveillance 217:13 | +| standing 131:11 | 101:12 116:16 | 216:22 | 226:13 | susceptible 116:6 | +| standpoint 36:24 | statutory 52:19 | students 22:8 | suggestion 49:14 | suspect 27:21 | +| 61:1 | stay 56:18 57:4,8 | stuff 93:6 | 56:12 91:24 92:19 | sustain 56:11 123:3 | +| stands 32:25 89:17 | 92:3,6 96:5,19 | subject 50:18 53:5 | 222:2 | 123:19 160:2 | +| start 3:3 21:10 | 99:21 100:4 | 77:14 87:25 88:9 | suggests 86:10 | 164:24 180:5 | +| 43:11 61:11 91:20 | 105:25 106:8,9,20 | 99:1 119:17 | 179:7 | 196:13,25 199:24 | +| 136:5 192:4 | 111:2,11,14 113:1 | 122:22 123:13 | suit 7:7 11:11 22:18 | 209:7 210:12 | +| started 54:13 107:8 | 113:5,7 115:18 | 126:21 129:3 | 23:21 34:20 | 214:11 217:4 | +| 121:21 193:22 | 117:6,16,18,21,23 | 171:6 174:17 | 109:25 122:11 | 219:6 | +| starting 6:5 61:22 | 118:2,6,23 121:15 | 182:16 | 130:6,16 131:9 | sustained 161:9 | +| 63:9 138:19 | 125:9,11,13,20 | subjective 137:18 | 138:17 140:19 | 166:23 168:15 | +| starts 68:7 | 127:13 131:22 | 137:24 144:1,6 | 144:2,8 171:10 | 186:10 198:9,19 | +| state 44:19 119:21 | 132:1 134:16,19 | 155:23 156:4 | 172:15 189:19 | 200:20,22 202:7 | +| 168:18 171:20,22 | staying 235:12 | 184:14 | Suite 1:23 2:3,12 | 204:5,9 206:7 | +| 172:3 173:9,25 | | | 95:23 | 207:14 210:4 | + +| 212:12 214:23 | 142:1 184:17 | thank 3:9 12:7,8 | 45:7 46:11 57:13 | 63:9,17 70:17 | +|----------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------| +| 217:24 218:15 | 185:21 189:11 | 30:10,17,21 33:8 | 57:13 58:11 60:24 | 73:17 75:23 76:20 | +| 222:4,16 231:16 | 191:11,13 192:4,5 | 39:18 48:1,2 | 63:13 64:14 73:13 | 77:11,21 79:9 | +| 231:22 | 211:19 216:21 | 78:19 82:17 84:18 | 77:7 82:5,6,7,12 | 80:15 83:2,7,16 | +| sustaining 77:15 | 219:12 235:21 | 85:8,23 94:18,18 | 82:25 84:18 87:16 | 90:11 98:5 102:14 | +| 152:10 174:23 | | 96:9,13,18 97:24 | 90:2,3 91:4,7 | 106:3,4 111:4 | +| 225:17 | 18:3 41:5 42:10 | 104:18 105:1 | 92:13,17 93:20 | 125:25 126:3 | +| swap 81:23 | 126:15 | 115:3 124:20,21 | 94:14 96:4,16,20 | 128:4 139:3 | +| sworn 152:22 157:9 | | 126:5 134:21 | 97:21 111:16 | 154:24 156:20 | +| 208:23 | tangential 77:8 | 135:16 146:12 | 112:17,23 114:7,9 | 158:9,22 159:17 | +| system 6:3,4 196:8 | | 149:20 152:11 | 122:3,17 127:14 | 161:13 167:4 | +| | tangentially 210:15 | 167:6 181:11 | 127:20 131:13 | 168:13 169:2 | +| T | tax 164:9 200:1 | 188:4,8 192:13,14 | 138:12 139:24,25 | 170:7 176:8 178:5 | +| T-Mobile 162:8 | | 198:9 199:6 | 146:17 148:3 | 178:7,14,18 180:3 | +| T.M 98:5 102:6 | teacher 22:6 | 201:21 203:4 | 151:16 153:5,6 | 182:20 183:15 | +| table 56:17 200:25 | teaching 22:8 | 211:3 221:10 | 155:13,15 157:10 | 185:7,11,12,13 | +| 201:5,9,11,19 | team 69:21,21,24 | 233:9 235:10 | 160:15,22,22 | 187:9 191:21 | +| tag-along 25:15 | | 236:24 | 163:11 164:17 | 197:22 198:1,21 | +| take 30:23 35:8 | Ted 211:23 | Thanks 63:3 64:4 | 167:21 168:11 | 210:15 218:3 | +| 38:16,23 40:21 | telephone 147:11,15 | 68:3,17 72:17 | 170:9 171:17 | 226:9 230:4,10 | +| 55:9,24 61:12,14 | | 135:19 199:7 | 172:13 175:6 | three-filed 145:1 | +| 63:7 64:6 67:12 | tell 87:24 89:11 | 235:11 | 176:11,15 181:22 | three-minute 61:12 | +| 68:16 70:6 79:12 | | theory 49:9 190:11 | 181:22 183:23,25 | threshold 74:11,18 | +| 92:22 93:11,21 | | therefrom 107:16 | 187:1,22 188:12 | thrust 107:5 | +| 96:6 135:14 | telling 93:1,22 | thereof 83:24 | 188:24 193:16 | Thursday 55:21 | +| 147:18 148:1 | | 133:12 | 196:22 201:5 | 94:11 163:18 | +| 160:8 164:13 | tells 6:9,17 7:9 | thick 55:4,5 | 215:24 217:6 | 236:2,14 237:3 | +| 178:4 186:17 | | thief 89:18 | 219:20 224:5 | tie 139:10 | +| 191:16 192:15,21 | | thin 26:18 | 226:2,20 231:5 | time 1:16,19 12:2 | +| 192:25 193:17 | temper 85:16 | thing 6:21 7:5,23 | 232:2 | 13:19 14:20 26:24 | +| 194:13,15 195:14 | temporarily 111:11 | 24:14 47:16 79:24 | thinking 37:17 61:1 | 35:7 36:9 41:3 | +| 200:16 203:2 | ten 143:5 146:17 | 88:4 90:18 92:23 | thinks 82:10 | 48:4 53:25 56:13 | +| 205:15,22 209:17 | tend 209:5 | 93:10 94:2,8 99:8 | third 13:25 42:18 | 57:5 58:6,12,22 | +| 209:22 210:3,20 | tends 175:24 | 104:19 111:22 | 71:7 90:21 105:16 | 59:9,11 60:10,23 | +| 213:12,22 223:5 | tension 144:17 | 112:23 120:18 | 108:7 147:23 | 64:6 74:13 75:16 | +| 225:16 226:17 | term 42:17 59:24 | 148:13 159:19 | 148:1 164:8 177:4 | 77:22 92:4 93:1,4 | +| 234:21 235:5,23 | termination 17:24 | 164:9 180:1 183:9 | 208:22 234:3 | 94:4 95:16,19 | +| taken 1:16 13:11 | | 190:1 198:13,14 | third-party 207:22 | 96:20 100:9 | +| 18:11 50:20 52:2 | terminology 42:21 | 199:8 201:8 205:3 | thirteen 218:25 | 104:21 106:9 | +| 95:16 104:2 | terms 54:5 89:3 | 208:5 215:2 222:5 | Thirty-five 69:23 | 111:3,12,20 | +| 133:11,16,21 | | 227:19 | 192:18 | 112:11 117:22 | +| 167:9 178:15 | | things 17:5 33:9 | Thirty-six 70:16 | 121:10,23 122:16 | +| 182:17 195:7,17 | | 39:24 58:16 65:16 | 192:23 | 124:17 128:25 | +| 200:23 210:21 | test 9:3 87:20 | 81:3 89:1,2 108:4 | Thirty-three 68:25 | 129:11 130:16,22 | +| 216:16 227:10 | | 111:4,12 121:16 | thirty-two 232:5 | 138:21,22 140:9 | +| 229:15 231:5,6 | testified 64:22 76:2 | 125:1 131:16 | thought 30:1 43:14 | 140:18 143:16 | +| takes 133:22 142:19 | | 137:13 145:15 | 63:10 73:1 87:7 | 144:1,12 162:24 | +| 183:19 | | 152:2 156:5,17 | 91:13 103:21 | 164:15,24 165:5 | +| talk 5:14,18 8:19 | testify 99:15 109:8 | 157:2,7,25 159:21 | 126:8,18 181:19 | 165:18 169:11 | +| 9:1 16:3 39:7 60:2 | | 160:1 183:22 | 183:10 187:3 | 170:23 172:15,20 | +| 77:4 81:5 93:16 | | 184:16 189:23 | 209:19 235:17 | 176:1 177:9 | +| 118:20 131:15 | | 190:2 198:25 | thoughts 71:2 | 180:10 182:14,15 | +| 148:5 156:5 157:2 | | 202:18 205:11 | 174:16 | 182:21 187:22 | +| talked 18:21 20:14 | | 206:14 208:19 | thousand 91:4 | 196:25 198:7 | +| 36:23 37:9 114:7 | | 218:14 224:4 | thousands 223:19 | 200:17 203:3 | +| 163:13 200:19 | | 226:12 | 223:21,22 | 205:10,15 206:3,9 | +| 215:22 231:19 | | think 6:2,4 14:24 | three 5:17 6:17 8:2 | 217:24 225:1,2,7 | +| 235:17 | testing 36:11 87:3 | 30:22 31:14 38:19 | 8:7 13:21 29:12 | 227:15,18 228:7 | +| talking 88:2 136:1 | tethered 88:23 | 41:24 42:1,20 | 31:15 38:24 54:24 | 228:15,16,23,24 | + +| 229:2,5,20,23 | 58:18 59:5,13 | twice 136:6 | 94:19 177:21 | various 113:3 | +|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------| +| 230:3 231:5 | 60:6 61:10 73:11 | two 5:16,20 13:15 | 179:18 | 122:19 208:14,17 | +| 234:22 235:6,7 | 91:8 92:9 106:2 | 35:15 36:9 46:19 | understands 51:8 | vary 61:8 | +| 236:1,25 237:1 | 112:14 117:20 | 63:15 68:7 79:10 | underway 61:10 | vast 147:12 157:6 | +| timeline 127:24 | 123:5 131:18 | 89:6,11 90:11 | undue 180:17,21 | vehicle 201:13,14 | +| 128:22 | 132:11 133:7 | 91:19,20 118:24 | unequivocally | 201:15,16 | +| timeliness 132:24 | 151:14 182:19 | 131:6 132:6 | 25:12 | vehicles 180:24 | +| 132:24 | 184:12 185:11 | 137:12 138:14,25 | unfair 81:4 233:12 | 202:16 204:18,21 | +| timely 28:9 | 222:7 228:14,17 | 139:1 144:16 | unforeseen 93:15 | 211:5 | +| times 6:17 31:15 | 235:1 | 146:2 177:2 | unique 18:9 | vehicular 118:13 | +| 90:11 91:4 109:22 | tricking 76:12 | 181:25 206:14 | United 49:16 50:6 | versa 32:21 | +| 131:21,24 147:14 | tried 13:12 50:22 | 216:3 217:25 | 52:14 127:8,9 | versus 4:19 114:9 | +| 159:14 185:17 | 64:20 141:23 | 223:13 229:24 | University 191:1 | 127:4,8 140:12 | +| timing 172:14 | 180:13 197:11 | two-part 197:16 | unleveled 80:9 | 172:16 | +| titled 204:17 | trier 144:18 180:22 | type 27:16,17 83:17 | unprecedented 98:7 | viability 178:17 | +| today 12:14 30:1 | trigger 150:8 | 107:23,25 127:20 | 98:23 | viable 66:7 94:8 | +| 57:7 92:4,12,18 | triggering 26:9 | 134:5 141:6 190:3 | unrelated 19:22 | vice 32:21 | +| 105:5 115:21 | Trilateral 212:16 | 201:8 205:3 | unsupervised | victim 103:22 | +| 128:11 132:9 | truck 110:20 | 227:19 228:21 | 177:14 | 116:10 120:7 | +| 134:8 160:17 | true 4:6 31:25 43:14 | typed 188:5 | Unsworn 232:14 | 158:9,19 176:16 | +| 176:5 186:5 217:2 | 43:14 45:25 46:2 | types 101:3,11 | untimely 26:21 | 177:18 179:2 | +| 222:6 235:13 | 119:25 142:14 | 177:13 | untrue 71:24 | 196:20,21 197:4 | +| 236:25 | 187:18,23 238:10 | typical 118:9 | 139:17 142:5 | 216:20 | +| told 4:13,15,17 | truth 9:4,25 10:11 | typically 27:7 | unusual 207:4 | victim's 216:18,19 | +| 31:10 41:9 45:11 | 41:22 47:23 86:18 | 101:13 129:23 | upholds 120:3 | victims 34:10 | +| 47:25 71:8 92:14 | 88:10 136:19 | 162:22 | use 40:23 41:20,22 | 156:20 158:10 | +| 93:4 138:2 181:19 | 232:15 233:2 | | 43:24 72:18 84:12 | 161:12 165:18 | +| top 201:10 224:5 | try 10:11 12:2,5 | | 102:24 105:15 | 166:2 176:8,25 | +| tort 108:18 134:5 | 15:24 35:6,18 | U | 175:19 186:14 | 185:12 213:13,17 | +| tortious 17:7 | 53:11 56:8 75:4 | U.S 75:19 196:21 | 197:18 201:15 | 213:21 219:3 | +| torts 50:17 | 76:18 78:3 85:2 | uh-huh 139:23 | uses 42:17 | 230:1 | +| touch 40:14 | 91:22 101:2 | ultimately 17:21 | usually 27:4 218:23 | victims' 75:6 97:15 | +| touched 185:15,16 | 110:20 112:1 | 107:14 130:23 | 220:13 | 97:22,23 108:13 | +| 185:16,17 | 113:10 142:3 | 144:17 230:18 | Utah 191:2 | 119:10,15 120:3 | +| touching 185:21 | 143:7,12 154:13 | umbrella 11:2 | utilities 204:22 | 120:24 133:8 | +| track 200:9 | 165:23,24 182:9 | unable 178:1 | utilization 34:1 | 152:13 153:17 | +| traditional 35:1 | 185:14 194:17 | unadulterated | 50:23 | 154:1,7 190:23 | +| traditionally 27:9 | 208:22 233:17 | 83:25 | utilized 45:19 | 196:23 219:2 | +| transcript 1:14 6:20 | 236:5 | unaware 116:13 | 102:17 103:9 | 220:7 221:15 | +| 51:3 95:14 135:15 | trying 3:23 4:4 7:18 | 165:21 | | 222:8 226:5 | +| 200:23 238:9 | 15:25 25:6 29:3 | uncertainty 179:21 | | 234:24 | +| transcripts 216:20 | 77:24 81:2,12 | unclear 90:2 | V-I-S-O-S-K-I | video 161:1,3,16 | +| transfer 181:5 | 126:18 133:18 | underaged 68:21 | 180:24 | 195:2,13 203:23 | +| transferable 189:25 | 140:3 145:17 | 70:3 78:4 | vacuum 141:14 | videotaped 203:16 | +| transpires 88:24 | 150:12 158:24 | underlying 147:5 | vague 165:12,13 | view 35:24 40:9 | +| transpiring 128:3 | 159:5,13 167:14 | 147:19 | valid 13:5 23:9 30:6 | 51:22 78:12 | +| transportation 66:9 | 174:4,4 185:11,22 | understand 3:2 | 50:1 | 132:25 144:11 | +| 66:21 70:23 | 186:4,5 209:2 | 14:21 78:20 84:2 | validity 30:2 120:4 | 184:19 223:14 | +| transported 65:24 | 225:7 | 84:22 93:2 96:12 | 126:23 127:17 | violated 36:13 | +| 65:25 66:5 79:1 | Tuesday 1:16 95:16 | 97:11 101:21 | valuable 147:9 | violates 8:21 | +| 156:12 | tugs 99:4 | 103:13 107:21 | value 64:17 77:3 | violations 36:11,17 | +| trash 167:11,15 | turn 5:16 8:2 110:2 | 108:9 136:10,22 | 78:13 83:22 114:9 | Virgin 100:2 | +| travel 204:23 | 135:18 | 153:9,11 172:8 | 143:15 151:9 | Virginia 103:24 | +| treat 53:25 | turned 172:4,17 | 174:6,24 183:24 | 159:10 160:16 | virtually 156:15 | +| treated 53:17 207:3 | turning 80:3 | 191:15 196:16 | 188:20 196:17 | virtue 34:7 36:7 | +| treating 228:20 | Twenty 164:16 | 223:4 | 230:11 233:11 | 114:20 133:6 | +| treatment 224:3 | Twenty-seven | understandably | values 183:16 | visitation 150:2,11 | +| 228:18 | 166:15 | 163:14 | Vanessa 211:5 | 159:20 | +| trial 14:12 27:5,6 | Twenty-three 165:6 | understanding 62:1 | vantage 59:16 | Visoski's 180:24 | + +Vitale 2:9 225:21 +228:4 229:14 +voice 148:24 +volume 1:12 95:12 +171:8 +voluntarily 39:2 +58:2,15 103:23 +117:5 +voluntary 227:9 +volunteer 111:5 +volunteered 54:16 +54:19 +volunteers 59:7 +vs 1:7 95:7 215:9 +vulnerability +190:18 + +**W** + +waiting 14:12 115:1 +135:19 +waive 11:18 119:8 +waived 177:8 +waiver 164:7,9 +walk-through 195:2 +want 3:3 7:23 9:8 +11:25 12:1 30:19 +32:6,9 33:5 40:13 +42:1 46:21 47:1,2 +55:1 79:25 80:2 +80:14 81:13,18 +85:16 91:14 101:6 +102:13 103:5 +104:12 105:14 +106:7 110:5 +113:10 122:13 +123:12 124:23,25 +130:12 141:18 +146:6,10 155:3,16 +159:12 172:8 +174:24 182:6 +183:12 184:15 +187:4 203:19,25 +209:22 210:8 +221:20 222:9 +223:3,8 227:3 +228:3 +wanted 54:20 56:24 +57:4 99:20 156:25 +176:3 +wanting 100:14 +wants 8:4 74:4 75:4 +114:12 220:8 +Warner 91:5 +warrant 6:5 161:1,8 +161:16,25 162:5,6 +162:16 212:5 +wasn't 31:25 124:12 +161:4 178:6 +waste 28:14 60:9,23 + +wasted 59:11 +wasting 58:11 +way 25:22 32:3 39:4 +39:12 68:1 76:20 +83:12 86:8 91:5 +93:6 102:3 103:6 +114:21 122:17 +123:4 124:6 125:1 +125:8 137:8 +157:18,19 173:15 +174:13 177:1 +183:25 187:10 +195:13 207:2 +218:24 232:3 +233:6 +ways 29:13 202:18 +we're 4:4 36:6 37:4 +45:8 60:1 76:6 +125:15 183:3 +184:12 185:8,9,21 +194:13 223:14,15 +236:2 +we've 11:4 64:16 +86:8 184:16 +weak 139:9 143:10 +143:11,14,16 +145:1,12 184:12 +184:13,13 +weaknesses 159:23 +website 20:12 +212:21 +week 32:5 34:18 +54:14 100:13 +103:3 128:10 +129:3 144:10 +weekend 72:25 +weeks 14:5 +weigh 113:24 114:3 +weighing 140:17 +weight 44:24 45:2 +WEISS 2:12 +Welcome 3:1 +well-founded +105:23 147:8 +186:23 187:14 +well-known 40:7 +54:3 88:21 +well-stated 129:21 +went 18:1 22:5 +39:11 72:24 78:8 +91:5 +weren't 84:23 +129:15 175:4 +West 1:17,23 2:4,8 +2:13 95:17,23 +whatsoever 38:13 +48:10 157:19 +196:11 224:3 +wherewithal 140:24 + +wholly 77:2 +149:5 +79:15 +willing 58:9,15 93:9 +103:9 187:7 188:1 +win 11:12 +wish 54:18 102:18 +134:23 141:1 +188:13 +witness 57:20 63:23 +104:14 109:23 +175:16 210:14 +witnesses 5:10 9:12 +66:24 73:23 88:12 +90:7 141:5 147:16 +208:15,17 +Wolfe 88:15,18 91:9 +women 65:25 70:3 +73:18 77:21 +106:11 125:25 +126:3,4 154:24 +168:14 210:18 +word 71:4 76:1,4 +112:21 139:8 +184:11,12 +words 7:4 9:17,20 +43:24 45:19 52:10 +73:25 119:21 +122:18 139:10 +179:14 182:6 +184:7,9 193:1 +work 63:24 91:24 +173:4 +worked 20:13 +145:13 +working 63:22 +86:16 193:16 +235:12 +works 64:2 +worms 122:15 +worry 104:11 109:8 +worth 163:12 231:5 +wouldn't 38:12 +116:17 157:1 +171:12 185:6 +220:23 +wrap 46:20 +wrapping 182:1 +write 85:5 +written 30:11 47:3 +117:12 126:6 +wrong 15:4 25:10 +122:5 162:11,13 +171:19 176:14 +178:20 200:11 +wrongful 7:4 +wrongs 150:14 +wrote 122:6 129:7 + +215:23 +X +X 177:2 +Y +Yeah 64:7 135:9 +yearbooks 165:8,10 +165:13 +years 14:4,10 26:24 +37:23 99:7 103:14 +113:17,22 115:17 +116:8,12,21 +120:19 121:11,12 +123:24 124:13 +181:23 226:6 +years' 219:21 +yesterday 55:18,23 +94:6 +yielded 73:8 +York 2:17 100:2 +127:6 202:13 +232:5 235:4 +young 65:25 77:21 +104:8 154:24 +157:5 159:17 +168:13 210:17 +216:21 + +Z +211:5 +zeal 34:7,12 + +0 +06 213:3 +08 189:13 +09 131:9 183:19 +184:20,21 189:13 + +1 +1 98:6 102:7 215:9 +1/13 221:9 +1:20 91:17 94:20 +1:25 94:21 +10 81:24 103:13 +109:22 186:17 +189:7 236:4 237:3 +10:02 1:16 95:16 +100 103:12 140:5 +1001 1:23 95:23 +10022 2:17 +101 225:22 +106 218:23 +10C 1:17 95:17 +11/28/04 212:9 +11:16 61:17 +11:24 61:17 +113 219:12 223:5 +225:18 226:14 + +228:10 +114 226:15 +119 235:9 +12 70:20 236:4 +12/7/09 88:8 +12:09 94:21 +12:30 236:4 +13 112:14 138:14 +14 143:2 152:14 +153:5 166:17 +1400 2:12 +15 63:5 93:21 143:2 +152:12 153:16 +159:2 166:18 +216:10 219:9 +221:7 225:22 +226:4,13 +15-day 216:14 +15-minute 93:12 +153 68:7 +1555 2:3 +16 160:25 +1665 1:23 95:23 +17 161:7,23 162:19 +18 102:15 161:22 +177:5 179:11 +19 165:2 +1951 127:10 +1974 50:7 +19th 213:3 +1st 205:21 + +2 +2 79:14 156:22 +215:9 +2,000 168:19 173:9 +2,000-page 168:24 +2:00 93:14 +20 163:4 +20-page 139:14 +200 64:14 156:21 +2003 212:17 +2006 205:21 +2008 175:9 182:12 +183:4 185:7 +2009 87:21 107:11 +115:8,22 128:3 +129:10,12,17 +172:21 +2010 73:19 +2011 107:12 232:8 +2017 1:16 95:16 +129:13,18 238:13 +2018 112:4,14 +205 1:17 95:17 +2139 2:8 +22nd 209:12 +23 61:22 165:8 +166:15,25 + + 25 232:8 + 250 2:12 + 26 165:7 166:15,25 + 27 166:22 + 276 68:9 + 277 68:9 + 278 68:10 + 279 68:10 + 28 167:7,20 + 29 168:17 + 29th 6:18 56:3 + 59:23 72:23 74:16 + 138:20 175:15 + 2nd 211:16 + + +3 + + 3,000 222:7,10 + 30 175:9 221:9 + 223:23 224:19 + 225:23 + 30-day 225:7 + 300 156:23 + 301 2:3 + 32 180:23 188:14,15 + 323 50:7 + 33 188:12,24 + 33401 1:23 2:4,13 + 95:23 + 33409 2:8 + 34 68:25 69:4 + 341 127:8 + 35 68:13,25 69:19 + 188:16 + 36 68:25 70:13 + + +4 + + 4 49:17 + 4:35 1:16 95:16 + 237:6 + 40 46:20 121:8 + 156:14 188:11,13 + 193:5 194:10 + 223:23 + 40-something 70:10 + 401 175:10 + 403 77:16 78:15 + 114:8 175:11 + 406.12 44:8 + 406.4 173:17 + 41.5 66:12 + 415(g) 79:15 + 415.5(g) 66:12 + 418 50:7 + 42(k) 70:15 71:8 + 42(l) 115:23 + 471-2995 1:24 + 95:24 + 479 127:9 + 486 127:9 + + + 49 198:13 + 5 + 5 132:8 + 5.2 145:6 + 5.5 145:7,8 + 5/30/2008 158:20 + 50 37:23 198:14 + 223:23 + 502009CA040800... + 1:3 95:3 + 51 198:15 + 52 199:8 + 55 46:21 + 561 1:24 95:24 + 575 2:16 + 5th 1:16 95:16 + + +6 + + 6/30/08 200:24 + 60 202:5 + 62 202:5,6 + 65 41:18 + 67 41:18 + 68 210:4 + 7 + 7 167:8 + 7,000 222:10 + 70 206:11 207:16,22 + 223:23 + 71 206:11 + 72 206:12 + 73 206:12 + 74 206:12 207:16 + 75 139:19 209:10 + 210:6 + 76 210:22 + 79 139:15 + 7th 87:21 238:13 + + +8 + + 82 6:20 + 88 215:1 + 9 + 9 52:15 56:3 81:24 + 115:8,22 138:14 + 183:19 184:21 + 226:8 + 90 215:4 + 90.403 64:17 + 90.404 79:13 233:19 + 90.404(2) 150:10,17 + 90.410 213:3 + 90.610 175:13 + 99 140:5 + 9th 184:20 + + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EX IBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E l c S1 ice y files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter. + +### IN DE OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objection 5. Privileged +- 1. All objections 6. Opinion +- 2. All objectio cept thenticity 7. Hearsay +- 3. Irrelev aterial 8. Authenticity lacking +- 4. P value substantially outweighed 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) by da ger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Di [REDACTED] (5/25/11)
f. [REDACTED] Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney Wild (10/12/17) | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| | | | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements | | | + +## L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) Da Ac r a. L.M. (9 • 9/10) L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 et tco , all court filings referenced therein and .Sek + +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | | | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. L.M. (9/24/09; 2/9/10) | | | + +| | | L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein .Sek | +|----|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 30 | Misc. | C \$n et | +| | | . al al ery and discovery responses tco | +| 31 | 7/24/ | o i . laint and Demand for Jury Trial | +| 32 | 7/2 | tipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule I I | + +| | | E.W. it. Jeffrey Epstein | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint CO | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiffs Request try Upon | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation J | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissin | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition | +| 48 | Misc. | | +| | | Court docket, l m referenced therein and | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | (D | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | | +| | | P mgs with Incorporated | +| | | Action for ertain Based on Parallel Civil and | +| | | Defendant tein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue | +| | | dum of Law 24) | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | of Address and Firm Affiliation 30 | +| 52 | 4/9/09 _ | amtiff's Motion to Strike References to Non | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiffs First Amended Com . laint • | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein 17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and | +|----|---------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | + +## In re O % Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA USBC S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
  1. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
  2. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
  3. [REDACTED] Adler (10/28/10).
| | | | +| | | | | | | + +### United S 6f America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action DC \$D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|----|----------|------------------------------------------------| +| 76 | 11/23/09 | d Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| 77 | 11/2 | ended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | + +### The Florida Bar Matters + +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inqui/Anplaint Form Jeffrey | +|----|----------|-----------------------------------------------| +| | | Epstein filed against J. William | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09 | E-mail from J. to Adler, | +| | 3:36 p.m. | William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | +| 118 | 7/13/09 | E-mail from Michele Dar (Palm Beach Daily | +| | 2:28 p.m. | News) to J. 08404) | +| 119 | 7/4/09 | E-mail from J. to William J. | +| | 4:37 p.m. | Berger (02201 , | +| 120 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 1:17 .m. | 049 | +| 121 | 7/15/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:22 p.m. | (04905 | +| 122 | 7/18/09 | E-mail from J. to Adler | +| | 4:10 p.m. | (01661) | +| 123 | 7/21/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Leone | +| | 8:21 p.m. | (01352 | +| 124 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from M J. to Michele | +| | 11:22 a.m. | (01479) | +| 125 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradle | +| | 11:35 a.m. | 05803 | +| 126 | 7/22/09 | E-mail from Jacquie to J. wards | +| | 1:29 p.m. | (01662 | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter fron La J. Edw noticing | +| 128 | 7/26/09 | E-mail from Priscila ento to Scott | +| | 5:28 p.m. | Rothstein, cc Amy l w s and Adelita Cabello | +| 129 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from B to Susan Spencer | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Wendel (0 • :3) | +| 130 | 7/28/09 | E-mail fro V IL •I Spencer Wendel to J. | +| | 8:59 a.m. | Ed (03 0 | +| 131 | 7/28/09 | E- a m J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 9:28 a.m. | 6 | +| 132 | 7/28/09 | -m i1 from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 10:00.a.m._ | 8) | +| 133 | | 7/29/0k, E-mail from Cara L. to J. | +| | 1:13 .InT | 08420 | +| 134 | 7/28/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:47 .m. | 11075-11076 | +| 135 | 7/29/09 | E-mail from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:49 p.m. | (05852-0585D_ | +| 136 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (05535-05531 | +| 137 | 7/30/09 | E-mail from J. to Michele Dargan | +| | 2:36 p.m. | (11320-11322) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat [REDACTED] and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02595-02596) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Nigel Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fi | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED] Attorneys/id/3/read) | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED]
( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-[REDACTED]/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited | +| | | "al Company for The Law Office of Brad | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Cmati Annual Report for | +| | | The Law Office of Brad and Associates | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Coil Annual Report for | +| | | The Law Office of Brad and Associates | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D a r | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times l3roward Palm-Reac • o I e Tape | + +## e + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 287 | Misc. | All public records, news articles and prior testimony of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott | +|-----|---------|----------------------------------------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog — Rothstein | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. ChiefJudge: | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +Gs' + +nkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many (Frt2 Primary: Scott@lin ocklAiw.com Primary: Ka inkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco Eservice(alinkrocklaw.com + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +(S; 'i Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +# AS TRANSCRIPT O + +?c/2d1:4e r + +DATE TAKEN: day, March 8th, 2018 TIME: p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +(..Se lS'ivillIr + +Ai'...) k This cause came on to be heard at the time and ace aforesaid, when and where the following oceedings were reported by: + +Cos + +Elaine V. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 APPEARANCES: + +2 For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: + +3 4 LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE + +6 7 8 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE cos + +10 11 For Non-Parties L.M., E.W. ta e + +12 13 HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, 4 0 Salt Lake City, 1 By PAUL G. CASS QUIRE + +14 + +15 For Jeffrey E t\* + +16 17 ATTERB Y, DBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Aus a ian Ave. South, Suite 1400 We Palm Beach, FL 33401 By fOrA. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +0 + +1 + +2 + +3 + +4 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +### PROCEEDINGS + +THE COURT: Thank you. Welcome back everybody. Have a seat. + +MR. SCAROLA: May I move to this podium now? + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. + +Your Honor, have we decided what going to hear? we're + +THE COURT: Yes. My and was going to be Motion in Limine Addre Evidence, and of nding as I left upplement to cope of Admissible that same vein Epstein's Notice of Servi of nredacted Appendix in Support -- e nse in Opposition to Second S plem ntal Motion in Limine addressing Scop of A issible Evidence. + +. SCAROLA: Your Honor, there are actually a ul~nple submissions to the Court to deal with losely-related issues, and those issues arise out of the fact that over the course of the last three weeks 724 new exhibits have been added to the exhibit list of the defendant Epstein. + +And just to provide some general background, some of which your Honor may recall, there was an + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 exhibit list filed by Mr. Epstein on November 16, 2017. That same exhibit list was attached to the pretrial stipulation on December 22, 2017. And then for the first time on March 5th of 2018 the new exhibit list was filed. If you compare the .44.2k exhibit lists of November 16th and December nd, which, as I said, are the same, with the t ch 5L, exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- - 724 new exhibits were added. excu + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Your Honor held a hearin this matter on December 5th and made it exhibits that were not December -- and I all parties that sed by the end of may have been the December 22 dat --ahn not sure about that exact Ze (C ) date -- but x i ' s that were not specifically disclose wo not be permitted to be used at tria You made it clear that catchall listings w ld unacceptable; that specific individual x Au , C5 'bits needed to be listed. I'm sure your Honor as a recollection of those circumstances. And that, obviously, is a fairly standard order that your Honor adheres to in connection with trial practice. + +24 25 THE COURT: What I just wanted to point out is in conjunction with what we're going to be + +eventually talking about, we're now dealing with the Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on ' Privilege Log. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: That led into what I bed earlier of the motions that will on the table. + +MR. SCAROLA: That's cor And that's why I acknowledged, your Hono we're really dealing with a number ely-related motions. + +So the first a procedural issue; and that is, whethe ou Honor is going to allow the listing and sg 724 new suggesti e Court is that that is a threshold exhibits. And my issu that really helps to resolve much of what f lou because if, as a matter of procedure, those 72 ew exhibits are not going to be used, then uch of the rest of the argument becomes irrelevant. There are, however, very significant substantive issues if the procedural determination does not dispose of the use of those exhibits. + +THE COURT: These exhibits specifically were added when? + +1 2 MR. SCAROLA: They were added by a new list filed on March 5th of 2018. + +3 4 6 7 THE COURT: Okay. Just to put this into perspective, March 5th would have been Monday of this week, today being March 8th, and the trial starting on March 13th, presuming it begins a scheduled. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. But I take it clear that while the 724 were neve li ted on a prior exhibit list before Mar some of those documents were disclosed er the past three weeks. So I am not su g to your Honor that the first notice w an intent to attempt to use these docu4 is s March 5. The first notice we got of a 17 1 document disclosures to attempt to use some of these ed some three weeks ago as new were sent to us. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AAd again, this is from memory, but I think O hie may have been three separate groups of w71?°6 ocuments that were sent to us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the materials that you have reviewed much attention was focused on documents that we contend and have contended for eight years are privileged documents. Documents listed on a very specific privilege log. + +1 2 3 And those are 45 of the 724 newly-listed documents. And those documents were brought to our attention just last week. + +4 6 7 8 9 So my suggestion to your Honor is that we deal first with the procedural issue because, as I said, that will narrow issues significantly. there will still remain some substantiv ue with regard specifically to any attem e of privileged materials. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Now, your Honor heard fr th opposing counsel that I have accus of having stolen the documents. I assu Honor that that's not the case. I have sed them of having stolen the documents. at have said in repeated communicati s hat these are stolen documents. And thes do u ents, if your Honor has had an oppo unity to look at the timeline, were very at this point handed over by the bankruptcy for one purpose and one urpose only; and that was to print them out, • stamp them so that they could be turned over for privilege review by the Jaffe law firm, including specifically Brad + +24 25 THE COURT: Let me stop you there so we can put this in context. + +Joe Ackerman, as I recollect, was representing Mr. Epstein for some period of time, and he was at that juncture associated with the firm in some capacity. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. That's correct. + +THE COURT: So if I'm understanding th's correctly then, the bankruptcy court to C. th documents over to + +0 MR. SCAROLA: Did your Honor ant me to get into that now? I'm happy to at. + +THE COURT: So that tand. I know during a very tumultuo od of time these would be the Rothstein f' ployee. + +MR. SCAROA% Yea, sir. Let me go through sme this and gi o a quick overview, although all the deta provided in the timeline that I prov ed to your Honor. + +V t happened was that almost immediately CSol'lowing the implosion of the Rothstein, osenfeldt, Adler firm a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, and that trustee took control of all of the firm's files and all of the firm's electronic data, including all of its e-mail servers. So it is the trustee that had possession of all of these + +'elek + +e-mails. + +Mr. Epstein through counsel, and at this point it was the firm, issued a subpoena in our civil litigation, then pending in front of Judge , for the trustee to produce all of the e-mails. Judge Ray, to whom that subpoena referred, Judge Ray appointed Judge Car special to make a determinatio i tb what could appropriately be turned over bec use obviously these were e-mails related to a wide variety of cases. It was ire contents of the e-mail server of R Rosenfeldt, Adler, and it was recogni those e-mails could contain attorne li t and work product privileged materials. ge Carney was appointed a special a determination as to what should and tld be turned over and report back to Judge + +0 Judge Carney gets 27,000 e-mails and Judge arney says, "I don't have an appreciation as to what may be privileged here. We need to come up with a procedure so that I can be advised of what privilege assertions are being raised." So Judge Carney says, "I want what was then the newly-formed law firm that Mr. is working in, I want + +1 Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos and Lehrman" + +2 THE COURT: Jaffe, right? + +3 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Jaffe. + +4 THE COURT: We can just refer to them as Jaffe. + +6 7 8 9 10 MR. SCAROLA: All right. "I want Farm r Jaffe to go through these e-mails and prepare iv ege log. Let me know what's privileged h d then I'll make a determination as to wh going to get turned over." + +11 12 13 14 15 16 documents t enters a The response from Mr c through me is this is 27,000 e-mails ant them, they should be responsible for g them and stamping them and delive gStose printed and stamped AllZ7e r our review. And Judge Ray + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 nd Judge Ray says in his order -- and it's n relevant part at the bottom of the first of this timeline -- Judge Ray says the law irm of will print a hard copy of all the documents contained on the disks with numbers added and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the special and an identical set to , who will use the same to create its privilege log. + +And Judge Ray, federal bankruptcy Judge Ray, says, ' will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the disk provided to it nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of copiers. c Should it be determined that o Epstein retained images or copies of th je t documents on its computer or otherwis Court retains jurisdiction to award sanc ion in favor of , Brad or his c + +So it was obvious th was to happen at that point was they we ke over the ministerial task a • rs of the court of bearing the exp turn these documents over to Jaff a rad for purposes of preparin a p ilege log. + +CO RT: For lack of a better metaphor, wasn't that a fox in a henhouse type of tion? + +MR. SCAROLA: Well, sir, were these not officers of the court, the answer to that question is yes. These were adversaries who were being given control over these documents, but they were adversaries who had a sworn duty to follow the Court's direction. And we had every reason to + +1 2 3 believe that this respected law firm and these respected lawyers would do exactly what they were told to do. + +4 6 7 Now, we know that the disk that contained that information, as has been conceded by Epstein's counsel, was formatted on December 10 -- expuSe me -- December 8th of 2010. + +8 9 THE COURT: What do you mean by ) formatted? AS. k was + +10 11 12 C. c , MR. SCAROLA: What I mea the documents on that disk were divided in different categories. + +13 THE COURT: AS was December 10? + +14 MR. SCARO D ember 8th of 2010. + +15 THE CO '1< • Zr hank you. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. after being ordered not to retain any copies adisk that is formatted by is the disk that is now in the possession of effrey Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's counsel. And it contains without a doubt those documents that we identify on a privilege log that is generated as a consequence of that process. It contains those privileged and attorney work product e-mails. And that assertion of privilege has never been So within approximately one week + +overruled. + +THE COURT: Did the Special Magistrate Carney or Judge Ray ever hold a hearing to determine the nature of the privilege? Was that ever called up for a hearing? + +MR. SCAROLA: What happened, your Hono , is that Judge , when he learned of the circumstances of what was going on in ba ptcy court, communicated to Judge Carne his subpoena was issued in my case. work you are doing, it is RY AV While sect you and the relevant and material se and it is my job to determine issue vilege in my case." That short circuited e rk that was going on in the bankruptcy u t and Judge Carney never issued any rulings regard. to decide what is + +his +Court t hen became a matter over which Judge exercising jurisdiction to determine how ubpoena issued in the Circuit Court State case, how that subpoena was going to be responded to. So our privilege log goes to Judge + +> And there's some back and forth about whether the privilege log is or is not adequate, and there is a direction with regard to certain requests for + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 documents on the privilege log. Specifically, there is a Request Number 13, which asks for communications between Jaffe and the federal government and communications between Jaffe and any members of the press. And those are ordered turned over. And those are turned2vtr in full compliance with the Court's order.1 issues of privilege that were raised gard to both attorney-client and work prod ct rivilege never gets ruled on by Judge because before they are ruled on, a volu smissal is taken of the claims against ards. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 So we have a i 'e log in place. It specifically li t se documents. Some of these c5 ) documents w e 1 ed as attorneys' eyes only. And that res is n has never been lifted. And some of t se documents are listed on the separate e log, and those restrictions have never lifted. + +20 21 22 23 Now, in some of the communications that have gone on back and forth you may have seen reference to a disclosure to the Razorback defendants. Excuse me. The Razorback plaintiffs. + +24 25 THE COURT: That was the litigation led by Mr. Scherer. + +rivilege, will turn over anything that you consider ate for us to turn over. But we have no 'ty to waive our client's attorney-client your Honor, and some of these e-mails clearly contain information that originated with clients. And we are in the midst at this point of still-pending litigation, and it is important for us to protect our work product privilege as well. Some of that litigation is still ongoing right now. + +MR. SCAROLA: That is correct. The Conrad Scherer firm was involved in that litigation, and the Conrad Scherer firm was also interested in getting to take a look at whatever relevant e-mails might have been in the hands of the bankruptcy trustee, and then got turned over to us. + +Well, there were direct negotiatio w ich I was a personal participant with the s for Conrad Scherer, and an agreement s r ached with the lawyers for Conrad Schere ause, as we have told every judge before w ave appeared with regard to these matter not attempting to hide anything. Yo St o conduct an in-camera inspection, we t u to conduct an in-camera inspection c u it will confirm that we're not attempti to ide anything. + +That's the Crime Victims Rights Act case. + +So there is a very legitimate reason for us to be concerned about protecting both the work product privilege and the attorney/client privilege, particularly protecting it from Mr. Epstein, and particularly protecting it from Mr. Epstein n w that we know there was a clear violatio ► **th federal judge's order with regard to ter in which these materials were to be h ndl d.** + +**Interestingly -- and I d know whether there's any relationship - but shortly after this disk is imp retained by , that e inds up withdrawing from the case. So t 'r gone. And apparently the disk sits tt r years until a request is made to turn of files.** + +**nd what we have been told is ki!pv tia y, for whatever reason, resists that rie est, but Mr. Link and associates go down to Nhjiami, they review files, they get their hands on this disk. There is a significant delay between their appearance in the case and when they finally go to look at the files. Then there's a two-week delay between looking at the files and receiving the disk. And then** + +1 2 there's a two-week delay between receiving the disk and starting to + +3 THE COURT: Excuse me just a minute. + +4 Bailiff, see what may be transpiring outside, please. Pardon me. Off the record. + +6 (Discussion held off the record.) + +7 THE COURT: Go ahead. I apologize. 464r + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, in the 1 scheme of things, I don't think th t those delays make very much difference at the lawyers who, as your Ns noted, announced to the Court that they oing to be ready for trial 90 days late d ere it is just weeks before this cas s out to begin that they are 7e first revie n 1 boxes, or over 30 boxes of files. gh ave been 31. I think 36 is the numb B boxes of files that never even got r i by them. But these are + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So those are matters of significant concern to s. But the matter of greatest concern is that once it becomes apparent that these are documents that are listed on our privilege log, a privilege that has never been challenged, a privilege that remains in place, and we notify opposing counsel here is our privilege log, here are the numbers, + +the numbers of these documents on that privilege log, you have an obligation, an ethical obligation, to turn them over to us, to turn them over now, and to make no use of those documents unless and until you have a court order that says otherwise. You need to tell us where did y u get them, when did you get them, how did yo t em, to whom have you distributed them? Aid e are questions that we still don't have ans ered. + +What we get from the oth, de is, "Well, they could have come from ey could have maybe come from there, maybe me from someplace else, we don't kno ." A if they don't know where S o they came from t t source is clearly a proper 1 7., t v the burden in overcoming this ion to prove a waiver if they cont d any waiver existed. source, the privileg + +wasn't with regard to Conrad Scherer se when those documents were turned over to onrad Scherer -- and we have the letters that confirm the written agreement with every detail of that agreement in place -- those were turned over as part of a common interest privilege with an express representation it was attorneys' eyes only, with an express representation they would be turned + +over to no one. Indeed, when they got turned over to Conrad Scherer, they were originally turned over with a confidentiality watermark on every document. + +And then they contacted us back again and said, "We're trying to OCR all of these documents so that they are searchable, and we can't d hat with the watermark on them. Can you pl pr vide us with another copy without a waterm ' And we did that; again, trusting these offers of the And we have ad Scherer did. court to abide by their agree every reason to believe At \ t They were not the sour + +ib The obvious s 8s, , ased have been able Whit after th now upon what we e together, is very clearly roper retention of this material een expressly ordered by the federal court not to retain any of it. + +, every representation I have made to the Copo t, everything that is included on this timeline an be established through documents that pinpoint the dates and the identity of involved and the character of was made and every disclosure the individuals every disclosure that that was withheld. It has taken a substantial effort to put all of this together again. We have been working on this + +many, many, many hours. But the subject of appropriate sanctions is a subject for another day except to this extent: We need to know who has access, who has had access to this confidential material. We need to know if there's some intent to call a witness who may have been given apcSss to this confidential material. We need to the lawyers involved. of + +And Mr. Cassell is going to a dre s from the perspective of the clients th cern that they have about being informed Q ow their confidences have been d. So with your A Y Honor's permission I SS o d like him to have an opportunity to re the Court briefly on that topic. + +THE What I'd like to do, though, is allo defense counsel to be able to speak to the d Binger analysis dealing with the late Clii closure, because if Mr. Scarola is right and at is that these exhibits were listed for the first time in March, which would have been three days ago, and discussed perhaps within the last few weeks, then we would have essentially a Binger issue to analyze. So Miss Rockenbach, go ahead and proceed in that respect, please. + +4. ?bk + +(:)-mail 04408; MS. ROCKENBACH: This is the stamp an e-mail from to Paul Cassell, October 17, 2009. + +'le + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, your Honor. I am certain that this courtroom is a place where we are searching for truth and not hiding evidence, whether it is evidence that causes conclusion by this Court that there is no case to be tried. And for the first time after four days of n e use that word -- + +MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. I'm so f this is one of the privileged e-mails, assume it probably is, your Honor has e d an order sealing these documents, press is present. It is being displayed Qm tly in violation of ethical obligation \ r inquish possession of 44c, these documents + +Ag e t THE CO • r1 1 right. In lieu of publication in open ur by don't you just hand me the document making sure that counsel also has the is referenced with the correct stamp. + +THE COURT: Okay. Is this an extra copy? MR. SCAROLA: Do we have an extra copy, please? There are literally thousands of e-mails we're dealing with. + +1 2 MR. LINK: It's in the appendix that we've provided you. + +3 4 THE COURT: I'm familiar with it from reading the materials myself and I could probably put my hands on it. + +6 7 MR. LINK: It's in the appendix, your or. Appendix 1. + +8 MR. VITALE: + +9 E. TERRY: 04408. + +10 MS. ROCKENBACH: That's ' Thank you. + +11 12 THE COURT: And I hay oo. I can get my hands on it pretty eas hink. + +13 14 MR. CASSELL: nor, if I could just be heard just brie + +15 16 THE CO o ahead and introduce yourself to our new ur eporter. + +17 18 CA SELL: Paul Cassell on behalf of three LM, EW and Jane Doe. + +19 20 21 We'd like the record to be clear that we're oining public disclosure or reference to these documents. in the objection to any + +22 23 THE COURT: Well, reference and public disclosure are two different things, Mr. Cassell. + +24 25 MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry. Any disclosure of the contents or the substance of these documents. + +1 2 THE COURT: Outside of the Court's review? Are you objecting to my review? + +3 4 MR. CASSELL: No. We're not waiving any privileges, but we don't want there to be any public reference to the contents. + +6 7 8 THE COURT: All right. Thank you for h t clarification. So let me go ahead and Nyland put my hands on -- + +9 10 11 O MS. ROCKENBACH: Your Honor, cap give you AV the copy that Terry noted was 8. I don't need it. + +12 THE COURT: Okay fine. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SrS? MS. ROCKENBAC . h purpose of me putting this particular ec of evidence, which I've been asked on mu ' 1 occasions by Mr. Scarola to destroy arrage of e-mails over the past four ays, m handing it to the Court as evidence o Ac h. no 'nger surprise. It can't be Binger surprise rt . if he is authoring an e-mail with egard to this very action that's pending before this Court about five to six weeks before Mr. Epstein sued him. So that can't be a surprise to Mr. It actually makes this case incredibly stronger for the issue of probable cause. + +But more importantly, your Honor, it's about the truth. It's about the truth and the fact that over the past four days my professional integrity, my character has been impugned to the extent that very simply we told -- actually, I didn't respond to any single e-mail. For the record, Mr. responded to e-mails. I didn't want to on what I saw was escalating e-mails tha ed off with a demand that we destroy evid nce which I know as an officer of the cou cannot do, and a demand to disclose who, e. And we immediately did. Fowl + +Then I had my al issue an affidavit that establishe ha of custody. I obtained the Fed Ex rece' t r the three boxes that contained this inc disk. And that's on file with the cour + +o destroy evidence. I was called unethical more ct Sad t the e-mails did escalate, and we were -- no, demanded -- demanded on multiple times than four times, sanctions were mentioned, the words improper, unethical, six times, hid, disturbing, misdeeds. And then last, but not least, Mr. Scarola did in fact -- and this is not privileged -- did in fact send an e-mail indicating + +1 2 3 4 6 that he didn't want a special , declined our request for one because it does not take a special to determine that stolen privileged documents -- this is for the first week, or the first time the week before trial -- are inadmissible. I disagree. + +7 8 9 10 No court has looked at these e-mai An your Honor just asked that question, as really important, did Judge 1 ok t these in-camera and determine the p ege issue? + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 So I am very pleased gree with Mr. Scarola for the f ( ig e I heard just now a request or an agre ot even a request, an agreement that se hould be looked at in-camera. They absolu 1 ould be looked at in-camera because a iscerate Mr. Epstein's malicious pros ution case from proceeding. + +18 19 eft COURT: Mr. + +20 21 22 23 24 O But so disturbed was I by the barrage of e-mails, I reached out to the former ethics director of the Florida bar, a trusted colleague, Tim Chinaris. I have the affidavit. I don't know if your Honor has. + +25 THE COURT: I don't remember seeing it. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: It was very significant because I was being asked to destroy evidence, I was being called unethical for the first time in 23 years, and then I saw the word stolen, and honestly my heart was broken. So Mr. Chinaris has an affidavit that I've filed with the Court. e knows the information + +AS THE COURT: Is that in this? MR. LINK: Your Honor, it's it thg package we delivered right before lunch. + +I c THE COURT: Okay. tr at it. ACO lad to take a look + +ASS" MS. ROCKENBAC . e as the ethics director for the Florida r r almost a decade, authoring Ac ime thousands o o i 'ons on legal ethics for lawyers facing ith regard to the rules of regulgting the Florida Bar. + +of the rules that I was thinking about in of this hearing was 4-3.3 because both sides, (including Mr. , who happens to be party but should be held to a higher standard than just a simple party, has a duty to disclose candor toward the tribunal. That Florida 4-3.3 rule is very significant in this case because no one can advance false statements or positions to this Court. + +lith , + +1 2 3 These e-mails, your Honor, go to the very heart of this malicious prosecution case and whether it can proceed. + +4 6 7 8 9 But returning to Mr. Chinaris, he had three opinions after reviewing the relevant documents, Auk speaking to both Mr. Link and myself, based o the escalating accusations over the course o ur days. And his three opinions are ref in paragraphs 29, 30 and 31. + +10 11 12 13 14 Mr. Link and Miss Rocken• have acted in an ethically proper manner. s one. Number two, the documents in ^ were not inadvertently prov wrongfully obtained by Mr. Link and Mi Ro enbach -- + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. SC . Excuse me. is going Your Honor, if this h into an evidentiary hearing with rega to t7ie ethical propriety of opposing s conduct, I object to this affidavit as Oc Day and I want to be able to cross-examine any thic s expert who is of the opinion that retaining privileged documents known to be privileged listed on a privilege log when there is no knowledge as to the source of those documents and a court order exists saying you're not allowed to have them, I want to cross-examine that expert. + +THE COURT: Well, the objection is sustained in the sense that I really do want to, as I indicated earlier, continue to as best as we can conduct the proceedings in a way that befits the known integrity of not only the attorneys here before us but also the history that has bee pervasive in the 15th Judicial Circuit. I on't want this to dissolve into an ethical sion as to whether or not someone committe so e type of ethical violation. That's re not my focus today. And that focus is A perhaps at a different d even perhaps in a different forum. suited for others + +(:%E"V Really wha as o be attempted to be divined today is so of representation by counsel for Mr. Epstein ash to what the source of these docu nts were. + +ROCKENBACH: Yes, your Honor. + +C THE COURT: Why were they preserved, how were t4jhey preserved, for what reason were they preserved, did that preservation violate or come close to violating an order of the bankruptcy court, has the privilege been waived? And then we get back again to the Binger analysis. + +I did a quick word search, and the Fifth + +testimony." So that's where we are als going to be focusing today. District provides us with some recent direction and assistance and talks about the issue of surprise. And it says, quote, "The opposing party also earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony by an unsuccessful motion in limine. Furthermore, is in the context of Binger refers t he A ' surprise in fact of the objecting partyS is not dependent upon the adverse nature of + +But I don't want to ' a discussion as esponsibilities lates to the origin of ?4 0. how, if counsel' ; a re, these documents inclusive of the e the 724 y new exhibits being added formally to present counsel's SS unless we have to ' d particularly as it relates to for tjL first time on March 5th, just three days certainly outside of the Court's pretrial rapr in terms of timeliness, whether they onstitute prejudice. So let's try to focus there, if we could. + +a lil li. + +> And I understand, just so the record is clear, doing this for a long time both as a trial lawyer and as a judge, I understand how feelings can be hurt, I understand how people can take umbrage at + +certain things that are said. + +The beauty of being an experienced trial judge, if nothing else, is developing a thick skin. Sometimes I'll hear people say something and use my name and they don't even know I'm standing there. + +MR. LINK: That wasn't me, was it, Jud e + +THE COURT: No. And I understand th re are going to be instances where peopl oing to think that I'm the best in the wor d a d the absolute worst in the univers ve come to that rationale pretty quickly. k some time, but (;" it it was fairly quickly.A do understand. I illS don't want anyone i that I'm not pe compassionate t he xtent that I recognize that there have usations hurled here which may be minim l nsidered offensive and accusatory. But is move beyond that for now and let's get to some o the issues that I discussed earlier that we anytocus on relating to decisions that I'll have ao make concerning the potential admissibility of this evidence. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you, your Honor. I appreciate that. + +And we have established the chain of custody through the affidavit of Tina from our + +office. So it is clear we did not improperly obtain them, nor were they inadvertently disclosed to us. + +THE COURT: Tina is your paralegal? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Who obtained the three boxes, the three boxes from , which copctined that CD which is at issue. + +THE COURT: I think the disconne having here today is not so much tke fact that Miss received the bo somebody got notice that the boxes wer + +> A MS. ROCKENBACH: n issue. + +THE COURT: at somebody did what they did. And there y e been an issue with regard to W t luntarily turning them over. Those ar s that can be dealt with later on. And ain, it may be a different forum than I'm ling with here today. + +Xrly But what I'd like to know is how 0 ot the documentation, do we to know that, whether or not that documentation was obtained or retained in a manner that either was in violation of Judge Ray's order or walked a certain tightrope that could be construed as a constructive violation of that order. And if we know that, then it would go + +tik + +1 2 a long way in me trying to make a determination as it relates to Binger and its progeny. + +3 MS. ROCKENBACH: Thank you. + +4 THE COURT: So that's really where we need to focus. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I have no problem and I don't think Mr. Scarola has any problem in terms of fa t that you all did your homework; albei% his position, late in the game, and se u re¢ this information from 1111110 question, though, is why ' er have these documents, why w continued to be held, and was it i t ion either expressly or constructively it elates to Judge Ray's order? e critical + +15 16 17 MS. RO H: Thank you, your Honor. Mr. Link died this issue and will address that. + +18 19 LINK: So, Judge, let me see if I can lldriify a couple of things. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 First, these exhibits that we're talking about from the disk, they absolutely were just listed on our exhibit list. They were just located by us in the last week. However, on our exhibit list it's always been a general category, as Mr. Scarola said. The reason there are 749 specific exhibits + +1 is the clerk required it. So -- + +2 THE COURT: The clerk required it? + +3 MR. LINK: Specific. You have got to do + +4 THE COURT: The clerk, you're saying? Or the Court? + +6 MR. LINK: The Court. + +7 8 THE COURT: II, okay. I thought yo re saying -- + +9 10 O MR. LINK: It's called the cl rk' exhibit list for the Court, but the C did it. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: So in co n with an order that I had made earlie e proceeding that I was not going to a grieral catchall types of exhibit identif I required that each and every exhib' e pecifically listed. And we've gone thr gh riad exhibits in our quest to dete ine whether or not, for example, the Fifth dm t privilege is going to be recognized and r issues having to do with admissibility. And at was generally followed, to my recollection, because I dealt with many specifically identifiable exhibits. So yes, I agree that that was something that the Court had a specific interest in and has always taken the position that all cards are going to be on the table in a timely fashion so that, + +number one, first and foremost once all the cards are on the table, the law favors settlement, and it may come to fruition, and has more often than not resulted in an amicable resolution to a case. And as importantly, both sides are adequately prepared so that, as I mentioned in this Pollard cas no one is unduly surprised by something th me before them at or near the beginning i 1. + +that. MR. LINK: Yes, sir. So that + +The second thing I Court is that Mr. Edwa filed exhibits aft )Point out to the the same thing and rder, just like we did. And I'm not com in g -- + +THE CO • ell, if you're not complaining about it + +LINK: The reason I want to explain is in our pretrial stip I'm of the mindset we reach agreement, we have an agreement. Arc n our agreement, your court order says no additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In the pretrial stip Mr. Scarola and I agreed we reserved our right to add additional exhibits. So in compliance with the pretrial stip and this Courts' order requiring us to identify them, we've + +1 been doing that, sir. + +2 THE COURT: Okay. + +3 4 MR. LINK: So we are not in violation of the Court's order. Mr. Scarola and I again agreed to do this. + +6 7 8 So let's talk about becau e it A is as clear as mud. It is not as clear as Sc rola says. Here is why. If you look at h + +9 10 THE COURT: That metaphor, I sure I understand clear as mud. + +11 12 13 14 MR. LINK: It's not ASS It's not clear, frankl . t is not as simple %1/2 " and clear as Mr. S a ays. And I want to show you why. cThat's the point. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 I hone 1 nnot tell you, I can't, where ti. cam hat end up in file. I can. . Vie have looked for every piece of ation, correspondence, we've gone through boxes three times trying to answer that uestion. We have reached out to lawyers for They have no memory of it. So we, like Mr. Scarola -- + +23 24 THE COURT: Excuse me. Is Mr. Ackerman still actively practicing? + +25 MR. LINK: He is, yes. And we reached out to + +1 2 Joe Ackerman. Mr. Ackerman. Sorry. We reached out to Mr. Ackerman. + +3 4 Here is why it's confusing. And I think this is really important to understand what happened. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 When the trustee took over the files, there was an understanding by Mr. and his rm that there would be about 5,000 e-mails t ey agreed to do a -- go through them and privilege log. What's missing fro Mr Scarola's timeline is that in November informed the bankruptcy court stee had produced 74,000, 74,000 pages o ents on two compact disks. Not one. that + +14 15 16 17 18 So then wh Mr. we need ened, because of the volume, firm goes in and says, "Judge, We did not know we were going to g 74,600 pieces of paper and we need time to through them." + +19 20 THE COURT: I may have lost you. The 74,000 k,...)ages were self-generated from the Rothstein firm? + +21 22 MR. LINK: Yes. And delivered by the trustee to Mr. + +23 24 25 THE COURT: And Mr. , you're suggesting, indicated that they need more time to review the e-mails or whatever documents -- + +| 2 | THE COURT: -- they may have encompassed, and | +|---|----------------------------------------------| +| 3 | to raise objections, and that forum was the | +| 4 | bankruptcy court. | + +4 bankruptcy court. + 5 MR. LINK: All this started in the bankruptcy + 6 court. + +6 court. +7 So when Mr. Scarola says there was one disk +8 produced by the trustee with 27,000 e-mails on it, +9 that's not true. There are two disks and there's +10 74,000 e-mails. That's what Mr. Edwards +11 represented to the Court. I haven't seen these +12 disks, but that's what Mr. Edwards represented. + +12 disks, but that's what Mr. Edwards represented. + +13 So what happens after that is there is a + +14 complicated negotiation between the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +15 firm and Mr. Farmer, on behalf of the [REDACTED] Jaffe + +16 firm, about how are they going to take these + +17 documents, which are not [REDACTED] stamped, not [REDACTED] + +18 stamped, and they wanted a hard copy to review so + +19 they could make a privilege log, but they didn't + +20 want to pay for it. The trustee didn't want to pay + +21 for it. + +22 + +21 for it. +22 Mr. Epstein volunteered with the special +23 ██████ -- actually, ██████ ██████ -- but +24 Mr. Epstein's counsel volunteered that they would +25 use their machine to print out, print out from the + +1 MR. LINK: Correct. + +disk that had no stamps on them, documents, and Mr. agreed to that. + +So they print the documents out -- long before our time, Judge -- they print the documents out, a set is given back to the trustee, and a set is given to Jaffe. The machine that pr'n s it, according to the magistrate and all the communications, doesn't retain any im o we start with two disks. To make it there was three. One had a pp6 m. with two disks and 74,000 complicated, But let's go + +They print them opt d copy documents. One to the trustee Jaffe. The magistrate want clay, and so you will see the magistrate 4 disks: One with 25,000 images on it an ith -- I can't tell you how many imag because the special says, "I didn't (4c:2 a it." + +I think -- this is Scott Link guessing -- I ant to be clear about this -- I think the disk that ends up at was the special disk. And here is why I think that: A, it was in a file that said Special . B none of which makes sense to me until we put this together. B, there's a hearing where Mr. Scarola + +0ti,k + +YY + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 says to him, "You, special , review all these documents." Just like he said here, he said it ten times, "We have nothing to hide. You decide what should be turned over." The trail goes cold. I can't find a letter or communication from the special that says, "I looked. Here h y are." But I know this: The disk that w en to to copy had no sta + +9 10 11 12 13 When you look at the judge's rde from Judge Ray that Mr. Scarola pointed it says will print a hard c 11 the documents contained on the disk es numbers added. That's how they we ASS i to do it. + +14 15 16 S THE COURT: n nd hat disk, I presume, that f , you're allu did have numbers on them. I'm talk' t the individual documents. + +17 18 19 20 21 R. L K: Yes, sir. They're all s mp itrolpe e . So they were not the disks 'ded -- again, I can't say they're not. I'm a t ?l,, of testifying. This is Scott Link's forensic review. + +22 23 24 25 THE COURT: But again, Mr. Link, respectfully -- and I appreciate you're trying to put together and piece together something that transpired seven years ago -- the problem still + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 remains the same. Frankly, it doesn't really matter to this Court what format it was, who formatted it or to whom it was supposed to be intended. I'm sure there may be cases even after this Worley case that we'll be talking about tomorrow at length at the bar conference, b that case stands for the proposition globall Q th sanctity in that particular case of t attorney/client privilege to somet ing so rudimentary as whether or not ttorney referred a client to a given docto eatment. And the Supreme Court has clea ed that information is privileged and \1 n be divulged. + +14 15 s MR. LINK: 5, ir. I was just trying to answer your u 14441 s ; : en about the disk. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Okay. So the point that I'm tryi to make is when I'm saying it really doesn't tter all of those other details, what matters to THE + a h sanctity of those documents, for lack of a better term, the protection of those documents at Court is, again, Judge Ray's order relative to e all costs, and that shall not with the threat of sanctions retain any of those documents. + +24 25 It says here, "Should it be determined that or Epstein" -- so not only does it go + +1 2 3 4 to , but it goes to Epstein -- and constructively, if not explicitly, by this order extends to Mr. Epstein's legal representatives, from this Court's interpretation. + +16 17 18 19 MR. LINK: And I th that. The bankruptcy court r e that. What I'm suggesting to t Co t is I don't think it's as clear as Mr S a la said. And he may go to Judge Ray and dge ay will have a hearing. Based on what ;e've ooked at, I don't believe it's as clear t t t what they did because it's possible, 1 4: 40e upon what I've read + +20 THE COURT: That did? + +21 MR. LINK: Yes. + +22 23 THE COURT: So are you suggesting to me that -- so that I'm understanding correctly + +24 25 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. I'm not here representing . + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: "Should it be determined t a or Epstein retained images, op es of the subject documents on its compu otherwise, the Court retains juris ict on to award sanctions in favor of client," end quote. or his + +THE COURT: I understand. But you're here representing Mr. Epstein, who by virtue of this order that is being highlighted in part on the ELMO, that did what it was supposed to do pursuant to that order, returned everything that it was supposed to return, but through some happenstance had the disk containing they information that was the source of Ju order and somehow, therefore, shou d b exonerated by virtue of the fact that be we really don't know how may tten it, but assuming it should have done, miraculously this ns up in files and hence s uld essentially ignore the A4I;F , dictates of h der? + +MR. the urt. Let me make sure you understand what's x ,sdt:i disk. o, sir. And I think I've confused + +0 + +The 27,550 pages on this disk, we've only ooked at 5,000 of them, okay? Of those 5,000, I will represent to you and you can look at them -- I don't believe any and I know none that we attached -- were communications between an attorney and a client. + +I asked Mr. Cassell and I asked Mr. Scarola to + +identify by number if there are any attorney/client communications and we would segregate them. The response I got, every page is an attorney/client communication. So that's one. + +THE COURT: But that's not what this order says, Mr. Link. The order doesn't say anyt 1 g about privileged documents. + +ACt MR. LINK: Judge, I understand t t. + +THE COURT: The order says th AC) will not retain any copies of documents contained on the disk prov it nor shall any the memory of Fowl i s copies. And we images or copies of sa w ents be retained in s, A r. already went th gh he sanctions. wler White + +MR. LI t we don't know -- here is the disconne don't know as we sit here that the disk hat we located there wasn't handed to them by cia Carney after Mr. Scarola gave him O 'ob and said look at it and give them whatever ou think is okay because the majority of the documents we've looked at have to deal with scheduling and sporting events and going out drinking and all kinds of things. It is not a group of documents that are on the privilege log. + +Here is the second thing we learned -- + +1 2 3 4 THE COURT: And is that going to serve as the conduit to attempt to admit these documents into evidence in the face of the order that I have just read? + +6 MR. LINK: Your Honor, I see the order. What I'm trying to get across -- I'm doing a lousy job. + +7 THE COURT: No, you're not. + +8 MR. LINK: -- is that I can't to + +9 10 THE COURT: Try to get to the poi t that I'm really -- + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MR. LINK: I don't t ct we can conclude today that this disk i It of their violating this order. This ld have been as a result of the special to looking at it and saying, "I don't see c n tions between attorney/client, I believe been a waiver of the work product base on giving it to Razorback, issue injection, these issues have been raised." + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: So now you're suggesting that 0 t±k. ormer Judge Carney, to my knowledge a very well respected jurist who presided in the Circuit Court in Broward County, to my knowledge, and has done senior work here in the 15th Judicial Circuit somehow engaged in some type of ex parte communications with + +1 2 3 4 MR. LINK: Judge, I can't because I've looked. I have searched. I'm not saying that at all. All I can piece together is that Mr. Scarola asked Special Carney to do that. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 This disk, when we got -- we put a sticker on it. We went and looked at boxes and put stsc ers on things. The disk said Epstein Al p. Had no idea what was on it. Looked like ng we should put a sticker on. It came n, xhe disk, and we started looking at it. + +11 12 13 14 15 When these issues ca asked tS ci to please give u h aginal boxes. We got \ the original boxes f nd the disk in a folder that says J. Ca y inting on it. That's it. That's all a ' n this folder. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 The watermarks, there's no conf' entia ity agreement, there's no stamps on the ume ts. They are stamped and there's a in there. So what I'm s if we're rying to figure out whether violated the order, I don't think it's as c ear as Mr. Scarola says. + +23 24 25 Now, I wasn't there. I can't tell you what they did, Judge. But I do know this: Many of the documents that are on this disk and that are on + +1 2 3 4 their privilege log have been used in this litigation. They have been used. They have produced some. They're exhibits that Mr. has asked about and answered that are on this privilege log. There's over a hundred of them. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 A So this disk is not a disk of their pr'v leged documents. It's a disk of 27,500 docum . nd what's the most important part of thi s dge never held an in-camera. No udicially has looked at these. And tha here we need to be. + +12 13 14 15 16 iO I don't think any 's matters. What matters is we have \r ords, this Court shou de rmine they're relevant, see if there's i 'lege and see if that privilege has been aive That should be the process. they're relevant, + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Co RT: On Thursday afternoon, which is be taken up by additional argument, where y I'm a committed member to the Bench Bar, as s encouraged not only by the 15th Judicial Circuit and Fourth District Court of Appeal but also by our local Bar Association, of which many of you are prominent members here, so you know that commitment must be taken seriously, and I do take it seriously, and then Friday I'm booked up with + +1 2 3 4 hearings on other matters of the 14- to 15 hundred files that I'm carrying in this division, of which this is but one, with the trial to commence on the morning of Tuesday, the 13th of March. + +6 7 8 9 THE COURT: That's a big endeavor. Thytj is an endeavor that is beyond this Court's ab C ' s!' physically and from a time perspectiv I'm not going to do that. + +10 11 12 C MR. LINK: Your Honor, I that you don't have the time. I have of em a special . They don't wa + +13 THE COURT: too late. + +14 15 MR. LINK: Apt dge, the truth is never too late. + +16 THE Please don't interrupt me. + +17 I apologize for that. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 COURT: Protocol dictates the orderly istration of justice and, correspondingly, the rderly preparation for trial. That preparation - and you'll be surprised when it comes to larger cases like this -- not only applies to counsel and their team of attorneys that the respective side have, but it also applies to the singular individual who is responsible for this orderly + +MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +presentation. + +I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate responsibility. There it was to ensure app o riate attorney behavior, but it talks also abo o t exercising its control of the litigat the trial, of important pretrial heari gs ike we're having here today, and talks this is especially true in length -takes cases and goes on to speak about court should and should not tolerat t comes to interruptions and other matte th don't necessarily befit the A e presentatio crherwise excellent counsel. + +But was trying to communicate while we were speaking over each other is that this is the V son why courts have spoken to the issue of ly and reasonableness and preparation. + +I can't speak to the matter in which this case has been prepared by counsel for Mr. Epstein over the last 3,000 and some odd days. I can, however, speak to what is before me now. Why someone before you and Miss Rockenbach got involved in this case -- because I saw Mr. Ackerman's name in this + +matter in the four years that I've been presiding over this case -- I saw his involvement, I saw what he attempted to do. His timing was critical - whether his work was or wasn't is not for me to say, but certainly his time in which he spent in representing Mr. Epstein would have been cr cal to any successor counsel's involvement case. + +0 Thankfully, for the purposes f m st of the decision-making that I do her the civil circuit courtroom I had experienc gained a significant amount of ce in a relatively quick amount of ti was baptism by fire, I think some woul al it. But I had opportunities e to get into urtroom long before others did who had experience level. Whether that was good or bad, the results speak for themselves. d have that opportunity. And to learn a deal, not so much from those who I work with, ut even more those who I work against, so to speak; my opposing counsel. The wealth of knowledge that I gained from how they did their work was astounding and something that I cherish even to this day. But what it taught me more than anything was that preparation is critical, whether + +the case is a \$10,000 whiplash case or whether it's a \$10 million class action suit. + +And the very essence of what's being brought to my attention today, where requests are made for in-camera inspections at a time that's essentially commencement of trial, a special 44ew two to three business days prior to the thousands of documents several days b h commencement of trial for the firs ti e, despite recalcitrance from Whi heir -- somebody reviewing their files app for the first time mere weeks before the going to court, those types of things ha held -- I was going to say in high reg , t what was meant by what I'm saying is pry Agf ion e material in getting to these e was nothing that I knew of despite agai what appears to be brief recalcitrance on the part to turn over the materials elves, this could have been done six months go, a year ago, two years ago, three years ago, four years ago, five years ago, six years ago, and it should have been done then. To bring these types of matters before the Court at this particular time is, in my view, inappropriate. + +0 t ?l,, + +Now, if this was newly-discovered evidence + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 that was not in the hands of Mr. Epstein's lawyers since 2009, whenever this all came to fruition, then I would say we'd have to take a different approach. But the very nature of the documents that we're talking about -- again, rightly or wrongly held -- were in fact held by ite, Epstein's counsel, at an incredible crud ; ti e in this process; and that being in and a 010, when the Rothstein firm imploded, these e-mails were apparently confi when somebody made the decision that in paying for the copy costs, they b a d over to . And if I h t of an incredulous tone to that stateme i s probably purposeful. A411:tr + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 But th c remains, material Mr. Link, that these in the hands of Epstein's attorneys from he inception of the issue itself. And to now the Court with not five pages of documents ok at, but 27,000, or whatever that number -- it escapes me because of its shear mass -- is impossible and is not going to be countenanced here. + +23 24 25 And I understand what you're going to tell me because I've gotten a flavor for some of these documents that have been provided. + +1 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +2 3 4 THE COURT: And that is that they are detrimental to the position taken by Mr. and that they are helpful to the position taken by Mr. Epstein. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The issue, though, is one of whether t 2e protocol and the orderly administration 'us ice is going to be forsaken notwithstandi i the aspect of privilege and the sancti y o privileged communications, whether all o se considerations are going to be thrown ou alanced against material that has been hands of AS' Mr. Epstein's lawy S r day one. And I, for one, am not goi to acrifice protocol over what may or may t b number one, privileged, and if not priv certainly late disclosed documentation of a massive nature. + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Should the amount of documentation be a citnminative factor in a court's analysis in this ontext, based upon 35 years of compound experience, bench and bar, and a little bit more now than half on the bench, I do not believe that the orderly administration of justice should be countenanced and should be disruptive. Should be disruptive. + +And what I meant by that, should the destruction of the orderly administration of justice be countenanced? And the answer to that question, in my respectful view, is no. Because if I do it once, then I'm setting a precedent, even though I know trial courts traditionally do do that, according to case law. And forgiv f r my choice of words, but as someone who 1 for member now of the bench -- not a s op judge, but lc, a senior member of the bench at sends a message to my colleagues believe is the appropr not doing what I + +MR. LINK: I~eSond, your Honor? + +THE COURT: A + +MR. LI 'rst I want to apologize. I did not mean in errupt the Court when you were spea + +l4c, MR. LINK: Second, we're 7,000 pages, we're talking about 49 exhibits. There are only 49 exhibits that we are asking the Court to look at. So that it is not 27,000 pages. not talking about + +0 Icl?S` + +> Third, I think most importantly I absolutely agree your Honor has a difficult, difficult weighing decision to make between staying on course + +COURT: Not at all. Go ahead. + +and what I think is more important than any of this, which is getting to the truth. And I believe in my heart, your Honor, the reason I'm so passionate about this and the reason I apologize for interrupting you is if this courtroom is looking for the truth, then those 49 document8 have got to come into court. They have got front of the jury. + +0 THE COURT: But they're not c min in here, and I would hope elsewhere, i s going to be at the sacrifice not only as orderly administration of just also in derogation of a federal bankr urt's order or any court of recognized j tion's order that would have the necessa u rvisionary control of a given case, bu also at the potential extermination or derogation of a privilege. And for all of those why I am extremely reluctant to start g these things into consideration just a few ays prior to trial. + +Again, if this was something that came into play that was being hidden by the other side, and I'm talking now generically, and your side discovered that information at the 11th hour, this would be an entirely different discussion. And + +that's one of the things I want to emphasize for this record. But that's not the case. + +As I mentioned -- and this is the last time I'll say it -- these documents have been in the possession of Mr. Epstein from the inception of this case as we know it. They didn't move. nd the problems that are inherent in this si , of which this Court simply does not have me to address prior to trial, are all of tho e reasons that I have just described to The disruption of the orderly administra justice, the sacrosanct nature of t lege, and of even S c more importance is said I wouldn't repeat; A; and that is, th at 11 times analysis, f t inception Epstein lawyers had this mat ialf . And, obviously, the timeliness, or the ect untimeliness of the request for the C rt w to take these matters into consideration, o (Ceifh they are well beyond when exhibits that were nown or should have been known were not listed. material to the + +MR. LINK: Your Honor, may I have one more shot, please? I know you have been very patient with me. + +THE COURT: If it's going to be any different than what you've told me. If it's going to be the + +1 2 same, we've already established, and it's a matter of record, and I have made my ruling accordingly. + +3 4 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. I understand that. I'll be very quick. + +6 7 8 9 You asked about whether there was any hiding Atik i of these documents. And one thing I want t e Court to see is this: These are -- Mr. Scaro do t want me to put that up on the screen, so ' 1 hand it to you. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 C.) If you look at the privi log which they filed, which Judge ' dequate and I don't believe there wa nit er privilege log filed, so I don't ere's a privilege log - but that's anot d another issue -- but if you lZmme look at the r'v ege log and the e-mails that it relates me if a lawyer looking at that woul be able to tell the real content of the that Mr. was writing. Because I Crh you have an obligation to disclose in a way at allows a lawyer to make a determination of whether it's privileged or not. + +22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Mr. Link, you're making my point for me. Mr. Ackerman, , had these materials ever since day one. I don't know how much more I can make this clear. + +As I said, the analysis would be completely different if it was shown to me that somehow, some way the Searcy, Denney firm, Mr. Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I don't want to get him confused with the wellrespected coach and former coach of the Hea - Scott Rothstein was sitting on this stu Th t's not what happened here. That's the p f t at I'm not only issue of the trying to drive home and emphasize the issue of timeliness, not the privilege has not been te t first and it foremost is the fact t er , Epstein's illiSv own lawyers, have s tin on this from day one for seven, eigh + +MR. LI Djt we don't know -- the point I'm trying take, I don't know that they looked at it. + +COURT: That's not my problem. + +LINK: Maybe Carney gave it to them and aid, "Don't look." + +THE COURT: That's not my problem. If Mr. Epstein has a case against his attorneys, he can deal with those claims to his satisfaction. I'm not here to determine whether or not someone did or did not commit malpractice. + +MR. LINK: I understand that, Judge. + +THE COURT: I'm here only to deal with this issue that is before me; and that is, whether a wholesale late disclosure of significant exhibits that have been in the possession of [REDACTED], Epstein's attorneys, from day one and, thus, as a matter of continuum in Epstein's possession, his possession is constructive to the possession of the attorneys that represented him, that string of attorneys that have been representing him since 2010, and that if nobody got around to looking at [REDACTED] documents -- and how that could be understood is beyond me, as not only a seasoned attorney but also now a seasoned judge -- until you and Miss Rockenbach took it upon yourselves and your paralegal to do it is not my problem. And that's all I'll say on the subject. + +I have made my ruling. It is a several-pronged ruling. And for the reasons that I've stated, that's the reason why I am not going to engage in some type of a last-minute evaluation of documents that could have been evaluated from 2010 all the way to March of 2018. + +But nobody ever took it upon themselves to even look at those documents in [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +1 2 3 4 file. How that could be the case, who knows? But I'm not finding fault with anything you or Miss Rockenbach or Miss did. That's not the issue. You've done your job. + +6 7 8 MR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I have one minute to confer with appellate co n el to make sure there's nothing I need to do es rye this? + +9 10 0 sdf THE COURT: Absolutely. Let' Cu t take a brief recess. + +11 (Thereupon, a as taken.) + +12 13 14 short\44(c60, THE COURT: Thank you again. Please have a s elcome back. + +15 16 17 MR. Sc Your Honor, I want to hopefully tie up a ew ose ends on the matter that has just been uled on. + +18 19 20 IZZIIIIr I correct in understanding that the !4;16 0 ,0 e ndant is prohibited from making any use of the 24 late-disclosed exhibits? + +21 ?41. THE COURT: Yes. + +22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Next, sir, we would request the defendant be required to relinquish possession of all copies of the privileged documents to the Court under seal. They have expressed some concern + +1 2 3 4 stating that we have asked them to destroy them. We want them turned over to the Court under seal. They should no longer have possession of those until such time as somebody rules that they are entitled to have possession. + +6 7 And I want to make one brief comment a o t that, if I could can. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Your Honor knows very well that owS White is a very large law firm that keep me iculous time records with regard to the se s that they render. And the concept • is impossible to reconstruct through th a records what was received, when it to ived, when it was reviewed, what pe d with it, who was informed of what was a '.41I, p Z 7 ing 41 with it quite frankly is absolute i c nceivable to me; that a law firm of that ize, eeping records the way it did, cannot r uct what went on with regard to this mation. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: And that's a good point. What I was going to point out earlier and I failed to do that, and I appreciate the reminder, is that I would have expected certainly in deference to the fact that Mr. Epstein was a client of that someone from would have had the + +ability to weigh in somehow as to these critical issues. + +Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this C u t, to explain how and why they had access and t ese records in their possession in light court order and in light of this ongoing gation. And as a matter of respect to Mr. • ein and his ongoing legal team, to hay some type of affirmative steps to h t with this issue head on because of arent implications of same. + +So I a i t nt to make clear that I'm finding absolute no ault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss ampbe 1 or anyone else from the Link and ken ch firm in terms of what they did, albeit e manner in which they had to do it and the iming, unfortunately, of the matter from their perspective in having to do it, but that takes nothing away from what the Court has already remarked upon concerning the fact that now in the representation of Mr. Epstein had these records from the inception is one of the + +reasons for the Court's ruling. + +MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, may we include in the order a direction that opposing counsel is required to relinquish possession of all copies of the privileged documents to the Court under seal? + +THE COURT: Well, the only thing that obviously has to be taken into consider i the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and h 're going to preserve those rights in igh of the fact that the Court has rejected t st minute request for in-camera inspection reasons that I've already stated at leng e record. + +MR. SCAROLA: s why I've suggested that they be relinqu o the Court under seal, your Honor. The given an exhibit number. To the exte the appellate court finds it reas able and necessary to examine those ume°it\*ts, the appellate court will have the tunity to do that. + +0 THE COURT: So you're suggesting to file with the Clerk of Court under seal the documents at issue? + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, that's correct. + +THE COURT: That's better stated. + +Do you have any objection? + +MS. ROCKENBACH: No objection, your Honor. + +THE COURT: So stipulated. + +MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor will recall that opposing counsel has also informed the Court on multiple occasions that backup in the preparation for this case was being provided by the Gun r law firm, and we would like a certification, n t em as well that no copies have been reta + +MR. LINK: They don't have an dge. + +THE COURT: Okay. That' e. If Mr. Link and Miss Rockenbach are r ing that to the Court, I'm satisfied w representation. + +,,(( MR. SCAROLA: ccept that representation as well, your H r, ut what we would like and believe we e e itled to is a list of all persons to whom e p ileged documents have been diss mate . And I'm particularly concerned in t)&s r ard; that the testimony of any witness C5 be influenced by their improper exposure to rivileged documents. So we ask that a complete list of all persons to whom those documents have been disseminated or the contents of the documents that been disseminated be provided to us. + +And I know that Mr. Cassell has some concerns in that regard as well that he would like to + +1 2 address with the Court. So if he may have an opportunity to speak to the Court in this regard -- + +3 THE COURT: That's fine. + +4 Mr. Link, if you want to comment on that? + +6 MR. LINK: Yeah. I think I can solve that problem very easily, your Honor. + +7 8 9 10 11 The documents were within my law fi an my client. That's it. They haven't bee to any third parties. There's not a thir ty witness , V) m. u for me to put on the stand. ° have ruled we can't use them. We won' t + +12 MR. SCAROLA: k nclude Mr. Epstein? + +13 THE COURT: include Mr. Epstein? + +14 15 16 MR. SCARO H Mr. Epstein been provided with copies t documents or the contents of these pr d documents? + +17 18 19 L K: I just said my client. My law firm lient. And I can say legal counsel, oldberger. So that's it. + +20 21 MR. SCAROLA: That may require some further relief that we can address at another time. + +22 23 24 25 And so that the record is clear, your Honor, we believe that sanctionable conduct has occurred, and we are reserving the right at a later time - but it's not something that needs to be addressed + +1 2 now -- but we're reserving the right to address the issue of appropriate sanctions at a later time. + +3 THE COURT: Thank you. + +4 Mr. Cassell? + +6 7 8 9 MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. Paul Cassell, and I'm here this afternoon, and I understand it's getting late in the day, 1 e very brief, representing three victim , EW and Jane Doe. Just one housekeeping + +10 11 We have filed a motion t. ervene, which is unopposed. + +12 13 14 15 THE COURT: The o g I need is an order. Everything else wa ed but the proposed order. So if i < uepp'osed, then phrase it as such and I' a lad to execute it. + +16 MR. ASS Thank you, your Honor. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ust so the record is clear, on July 19, 2010, s en id a half years ago, LM said these very and Jane Doe through counsel said these documents are privileged. So the Epstein entity ents are privileged, and on February 23, 2011, that is Mr. Epstein and his array of lawyers were on notice at that time that every one of these 45 documents was privileged. + +25 And then what happened on Friday night, March + +2nd, was that Mr. Link put into the public court file summaries of the e-mails, quoting from them directly, and we believe that was improper. And indeed, we've heard today Mr. Link represent to the Court all we wanted was an in-camera review, but of course they wanted something more. They wap4d to put those in the public court file beca knew than the cat would be out of the publicity would ensue, and other d~magg to my clients could occur. And so afternoon to raise what i essence concerns about ASS" privileged materiA . Epstein. When I use Dg sy ere this re time of the ease of those the term "Mr. E tei " I'll entity. be referring to this + +Let ear. There is no doubt from sworn test ony in front of the Court that on January 10, 2 8 a nts of this law firm picked up a disk from ( Mh law firm, and the law Arm, as you know from the ELMO, had been directed some six or seven years earlier not to retain any copies of these documents. So there should be no dispute about the circumstances right now. + +At that time Mr. Link's law firm, Mr. Epstein, were in possession of documents that + +was in possession of that were in violation of a court order. Mr. Scarola has used the term "stolen documents" and I think that, frankly, describes accurately the nature of the documents, although who the thief was, of course, remains to be determined. + +So the question in front of you rig ow is what to do about this. Well, we know t ing. We know there's been absolutely no was er of attorney/client privilege. Hc! we know that? Well, your Honor knows th law very well. To be a waiver of atto ent privilege is something that is voted. There has to be a clear, intentiopol waver of the privilege. And how do we k w t re's not been a clear, intentio 1 w er of the privilege? Just use Mr. nk s word. Things are clear as mud. Well, l0 i som thing is clear as mud, there cannot be an 0 'n; ntional waiver. So there's no waiver of ttorney/client privilege. + +I know the hour is late. THE COURT: You don't have to feel rushed. want to make sure that you're heard and that your clients are heard. MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. We + +appreciate that because what we've heard shockingly this afternoon is -- let me -- I know we need to be careful with language -- let's just say an accused abuser, Mr. Epstein, the man accused of abusing my three clients, we are told has seen these very privileged documents. We're told Mr. Goldb r er has seen them. We're told, of course, in and his law firm has seen them. And of c his very large law firm, the Wh to aw firm, has V seen them as well. so th stion is what do we do? And + +And we're mindful fact you're about to embark on what's 1 be a very time-consuming trial. So I wo e to impose six remedies that we would as y u o execute today; none of which, I want to Ehas ze, will require consumption of the Courts time other than signing will provide for you. the proposed order + +The first is -- Mr. Scarola has already asked ,A..? !;::)or this and I believe obtained this, but I want the record to be clear. My clients are asking that you preclude any use of the privileged exhibits either directly, indirectly or derivatively during the upcoming trial because if someone relies on this information, for example, in asking a question + +1 2 3 to Mr. or asking a question to any of the witnesses that Mr. is presenting, that could implicitly reveal privileged information. + +4 6 THE COURT: We have all done this, so don't feel like you're alone. Are you talking about Mr. Epstein? + +7 8 MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry. If Mr. Ep 'n' attorneys do that, that's the concern + +9 10 11 12 13 So, for example, if they're f rmu sting any questions to Mr. , the uldn't be able to use any privileged inform n cause we're worried that that coul citly disclose privileged communi + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Secondly, wo d like Epstein counsel -- and that's a br t m that includes -- I've probably lost tra e different law firms, but Mr. 'nk aw firm, the law firm, I b,,l.iev. there are several others, Mr. Goldberger's g ailyf ecords, irm, we want them all to canvass their canvass their e-mails, canvass their servers and tell us if they -- how did this happen? How did this happen? + +23 24 THE COURT: You're talking about how did the firm garner these records? + +25 MR. CASSELL: Correct. + +1 2 THE COURT: Well, I'm not sure that any of their servers are going to shed light on that. + +3 MR. CASSELL: Well, it may be, for example -- + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 THE COURT: I don't want to go on a fishing expedition, as you can appreciate. I don't want to exacerbate the problem; meaning, I don't wa unnecessarily delve into myriad e-mail s ms to gain knowledge that is likely residin firm in some form or on, whether it be current or former emplo or otherwise. So I am not going to go to t '-nt at this juncture without furth or basic proof for going in that dire + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 It MR. CASSEL T t would be our request. But there would Alill a .road 41 - expediti you phrased it fishing would phrase it a retrieval expe tion -- to retrieve what's happened here. A B at the minimum we would ask your Honor then to it s,0 Oh ct Epstein attorneys who were previously before is Court, to examine the circumstances here. + +22 23 24 25 You noted that you thought there might have been an obligation for them to address the Court head on. I'm here telling you that the victims believe they, , has an obligation to 1 address the victims head on. How did this happen? + +2 3 4 6 7 THE COURT: And understandable. I was not confining the obligation of to those entities that I mentioned. It was those entities that came to the Court's mind initially. I don't want this record to suggest I wasn't taking 1 to account the concerns of the victims. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. CASSELL: Certainly, your Ho or, wasn't suggesting -- and this, of course, y first opportunity -- you have alway erred to building a record -- this is my op y to build a record as well. So we o know how these materials were obt + +14 15 16 17 The third e want to know is who were the materia ributed to? Mr. Scarola has made that req st o behalf of his clients. I'm making that eques on behalf of my clients. + +18 19 20 21 22 ?Se 're told that Mr. Goldberger has seen it, e told Mr. Epstein has seen it. We want to 0 ,t. ?L now who else has seen it. And this, frankly, may require looking at e-mails, looking at servers and that sort of thing. + +23 24 25 I think the record should be clear that in a routine case, you might say, "Well, that's going to be too expensive." Your Honor is aware this is not + +a routine case because I understand that two of the finest and largest law firms here in Florida are currently representing Mr. Epstein, so they certainly have the resources to search -- to accomplish the searches that would be involved to see how these materials got anywhere. + +The fourth thing is we want an orde4\$5;Lng Mr. Epstein not to reveal the content t is information to anyone. We are tol th t Mr. Epstein has seen the info on, so he should be singled out specifical n order. + +Fifth -- I think s already been recovered. All co the documents are to be turned over and se to the Court. + +Sixth, w t our temporary sealing order, which we ill rovide later today, to be converted into & permanent sealing order. Mr. Link filed in V is court file, we believe highly mp~operly, information that he was on notice was Te. rivileged. And he said today he wanted an in-camera review. Well, you do not get an in-camera review when you put those very documents, or at least summaries of those very documents, into the public court file. + +We want the Friday night filing, the notice of + +1 2 redacted materials, to be placed under permanent seal. + +3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 And then the last request is just a housekeeping request. We're obviously scrambling to sort out the implications of all this. I'm sure I have missed some points that need to be m Due to the late filing of this document, 1 t the public filing of the document imprope like leave to be able to file a su would V application for additional re s after the trial concludes and after we hav about how the document obtained and who they went to. ved information + +14 15 And so tho ar > the requests that I make on 4 behalf of m t o lients. + +16 THE All right. + +17 r. Link? + +18 LINK: Yes, sir. Thank you. + +19 l4c, THE COURT: Thank you. + +20 21 22 23 O MR. LINK: I'm not sure how I can be more clear about where we got the documents from. We got them from , your Honor. I don't think that's a mystery anymore. + +24 25 I've represented to the Court who I have shared the papers with. The Court has ruled that + +1 2 3 4 we're going to take the disks that we have and put it under seal. We'll destroy all the other copies. That's what Mr. Scarola asked for and that's what we said we would do. + +6 7 8 As to the filing, I never said all I wanted was an in-camera inspection. What I said w s Mr. Scarola said he would like one and I d great, let's have one. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 0 Most important is this: The ocu ents that we filed -- and there was some m unication with Mr. Cassell -- I want to e the record is clear -- we did two th e filed redacted documents. We red 1 of the names of EW, LM and Jane Doe, a thi ourt has instructed. So their initi s Ag w ;t: ewiped out. Mr. Cassell called me and s m looking at a document and i see thei initials." What he was looking at is we serve the counsel and hand delivered to the -- did not put it in the public file -- the nredacted documents so we would all know what was in there. + +22 THE COURT: By the court, you mean + +23 MR. LINK: To you. To the judge. + +24 THE COURT: -- to myself. + +25 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +1 2 THE COURT: Not as far as the court file is concerned. + +3 4 6 7 8 9 10 MR. LINK: The court file only contains the redacted version. We have double checked that. I asked Mr. Cassell to tell me if I missed a redaction. Could it happen? Yes, it could h ppen. We haven't found one. If there was one w sn't redacted, we'd be glad to redact it. t e only thing that was filed in the clerk ejwas the redacted version. + +11 Thank you, Judge. + +12 AS ) \ THE COURT: All r' t hank you. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 itt S S' Much of whichr uch of the relief that has been reques h essentially been taken care lame SiCi l) of I believ r gh the Court's prior order; that e disk containing the documents that are bajng sought to be introduced at trial to take d will be permitted to be filed under seal. Cih~sanitized redacted versions of those records 'm also ordering to be sealed in an abundance of caution just in case there may be some error, not intentional, on the part of counsel who filed those records. + +24 25 Mr. Epstein will be barred from referring to any of those records as it relates to the documents + +that were gathered from or from any other source that would have included those records that were the subject of Judge Ray's order. So it's to preclude anything coming in through the back door which wouldn't be allowed through the front. + +Mr. Link, did you want to comment o is. + +MR. LINK: Yes. I wanted to rem nd Court we have over a hundred exhibits th t w re listed on that disk that are already in i court file. We've used them in deposi So I'm wondering -- those are uded. + +THE COURT: m not talking about those. I'm tal g 1 out the ones that have been derived fro w r and that have been sought to be in od c d as part of the 748 or 724, or what er this number is, or the 45 that have been as privileged and have not been ruled upon ill not be ruled upon prior to trial because f the reasons that I have explained in detail earlier. + +MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge. + +THE COURT: Mr. Cassell, did I leave out anything else? + +MR. CASSELL: Yes. We want to know how the + +1 2 3 Epstein entities came into possession of the documents, and then we want to know where they went. + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 THE COURT: Because of the court ruling, I don't find that to be a front burner issue at this time. Please don't confuse anyone here. Court's reference to front burner as opp being an issue of importance. Front simply means that in preparation for a tr al hat is actually a mere two to three 'ess days away, if you count tomorrow, which really count as a court business day bec a my obligations to the Bench Bar Conferen n t have the opportunity to really delve to hat prior to trial. + +15 16 17 18 19 And as r arola pointed out, I believe, earlier, ha an be done at another time. So I am cert nly not going to forget that it needs to be ut it will be ordered that it be done post + +20 21 22 23 Any other remedies that are sought as you go along -- I understand the relative late nature of these revelations; hence, you are not precluded from filing a supplemental motion. + +24 25 I also note that you have requested attorney's fees and costs related to this endeavor, and I'm + +1 reserving on that as well. + +2 3 4 MR. CASSELL: But related to that is the distribution. The cat is now wandering out of the bag, so time is of the essence. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: Right. And again, I think that in an abundance of caution, and I understand y concerns, but what the attorneys here r iz and Mr. Epstein is also under this or is that no further dissemination is going o b made. I think that goes without sayin far as the attorneys are concerned. own each of them known Mr. Scarola ISg i Terry, Mr. Burlington, seated at counsel tabl o ny years, as I have \* Sr and I think the nize that when this Court makes a sta n that it is abundantly clear that it will e rced to the letter. I have no doubt in m mind hat they will all be respectful of the curt der of non-dissemination of any of those ents hence forth. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 And Mr. Link has already represented to the Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his co-counsel, that there have been no eyes laid upon these documents. Hence, I'm accepting that representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well. + +1 2 3 MR. CASSELL: We haven't heard, of course, from . Will the Court direct them to make similar representations? + +4 6 7 8 THE COURT: I believe that I have sufficient authority to do that under these relatively peculiar circumstances. My jurisdiction, t is somewhat limited because they have w' from the case. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0 As a general blanket order I froul¢i simply say that all attorneys who have o representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject order of confidentiality, of se n d of nondissemination of a information that is contemplated in the documents that are part of the umbr 1 der of Judge Ray. And that would include 1 o he exhibits that we spoke about toda and t at have been filed as a matter of /4 :r YIZ V + +19 20 21 MR. CASSELL: Could they also be directed to 0 IcAm?k ake a representation as to who they have distributed the documents to? + +22 23 THE COURT: Mr. Link has already -- are you talking about ? + +24 MR. CASSELL: + +25 THE COURT: I don't think that I have that + +ability. + +MR. CASSELL: Could I be heard on that issue then? I believe that you do have -- all right. We'll deal with that later then, your Honor. + +MR. LINK: Can I make a suggestion, your Honor, that might be helpful? + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. LINK: We now have, I think S36 boxes they delivered; I believe al th boxes they have. The disk, the original we now have it. I don't know for sure, b t that there's another disk that they d kept. If the Court will instruct as p f his order that we (S 0 maintain the bo , cause them back, will take possession of the boxes. wanted + +HE COURT: If you are telling me that you Cf rs e a thority from Mr. Epstein to retain those o and Mr. Epstein is essentially giving you arte blanche, you and Miss Rockenbach and Mr. Goldberger jointly, the authority to make any decisions necessary to protect his interests, that motion would be granted. + +MR. LINK: I'm standing here with this puzzled look because I'm not sure what that means, frankly. + +All I was trying to do is say I will preserve the documents, the original files, because I don't think there's another set of files somewhere. + +had asked me to return them once we went through them, and if the Court can instruct me to hold the boxes, then I will do that. + +44t THE COURT: I don't have a problem m that instruction, so I'll leave it at . You're speaking on behalf of your client Mr. Epstein, as well as your own law firm, an take it, as well, so I hay oblem making -- in entering this order si re current counsel for Mr. Epstein. Goldberger, I + +MR. LINK: will make c an . >you, Judge. I think that easier. + +MR. : Your Honor, there are two addi onal matters that I would hope can be pos 1 of in advance of the start of trial. + +THE COURT: Sure. + +MR. SCAROLA: One is Mr. Epstein's motion to strike Dr. Jansen, and the second is issues with regard to adverse inference. I think that both of those matters have been fully briefed. Mr. Burlington is here to present argument in response to the motion regarding Dr. Jansen. + +I suggest -- your Honor has told us that we're finishing at 4:30 today -- that we allot 15 minutes, seven and a half minutes per side, to each of those matters. + +THE COURT: All right. Off the record. + +Aral r MR. LINK: Your Honor, we have a mo,1 t strike the 79 exhibits that they disc ate after the cutoff. I think if we ng to do a goose and a gander, the Court ld rule those exhibits are stricken. + +(Discussion held off the record.) + +THE COURT: Well, -- I want to review that motion n ince my concentration has been on the se ci that I mentioned before. I'll be gla t al with it prior to trial. + +MR. IN I'm comfortable with your Honor rulin&onte papers if Mr. Scarola is. + +COURT: Well, I'd rather, since it's ? Spthing of the magnitude of trial exhibits and 79 n number, I'd rather have argument on the subject, to be perfectly with you. I appreciate your willingness to entrust the Court with that endeavor, but I think it's better to have you heard on the record. + +All right. Mr. Burlington, which one did you + +want to tackle first? + +MR. BURLINGTON: Your Honor, it's his motion. + +MR. SCAROLA: The motion to strike Dr. Jansen. + +THE COURT: All right. + +MR. BURLINGTON: Unless you want me to argue both sides, your Honor. + +THE COURT: What's the other motion2" + +MR. SCAROLA: Adverse interest nor, from the assertion of the Fifth Amendment. + +MR. LINK: Which one are + +MS. TERRY: Jansen. + +S'' Good afternoo SSu # Honor. start over toda See if I can + +MR. LINK: Jansen O + +THE CO • u have done fine. + +' ) MR. N : I don't remember winning one yet, SO maybe this one. I have hopes. + +V zQur Honor, this is our motion to strike c ora 0 r. ansen. And I know the Court has read the aper, so I'm going to be very brief about this. + +We have struggled since coming before this Court in December with what this case is, because I keep saying to the Court that Mr. wants to try a defamation action, he wants to clear his name, he wants defamation-type damages, and the + +Court keeps rebuking me properly and saying, no, this is a malicious prosecution action. We're not going to try a defamation action. + +Their expert that they want to put on the stand for damages has no opinion, your Honor, as to damages. Not one. He can't talk about any mage suffered by Mr. , if any. His so pi ion is that he was given defamatory state counsel, defamatory statements, an to d to do a search to see how many times efamatory statements hit a web page many people touched the web page w-4 defamatory statement on it. + +So, for ex le, there's AgE e that says R h t 'n and (s\ a newspaper articic , and that magazine or that wsp 2ler has 3,000 people that look at the news er He says there are 3,000 hits. He can't / c lor if one of the 3,000 people read the C5 r \*cle, what they thought about the article, did t make any difference, did they change their view of Mr. did they not do business with him, did they fire him? + +He says he has no economic damages, so how does it help a jury to hear about nine million web hits when you can't point to a single person -- I + +1 2 3 said, "Tell me one person, one person, Dr. Jansen, that you know read one of these articles." He said, "I can't. I have no idea." + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 The other thing that was important is he said, "I just use an average of data. I can't tell you exactly because they accumulated over month .' He can't even tell us how many times this a.4cle was actually touched. All he can tell yo to the Palm Beach Shiny Sheet webs 4V average month 3,000 people lo that help the jury from a I go on an . So how can expert determine whether the filing of icious prosecution action caused Mr. any damage? + +14 Thank you + +15 THE CO 1 right. Thank you. + +16 Mr. gton? + +17 18 LINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on f Brad + +19 20 21 1 tIcm> NLAuestions. First, is the expert qualified? That's 7 L This determination comes down to four not being challenged. + +22 23 24 25 The suggestion that he cannot give opinions on damages ignores the nature of the damages for which case law is clear, which includes reputational damages, shame and humiliation. They have + +acknowledged shame and humiliation as an element of damage. We've citied on page 6 of our response five Florida cases. Two of them, Florida Supreme Court cases, make it very clear reputational damages are prosecution a valid element of a malicious case. + +So how do you monetize how does jiCiy monetize the damage that has been suf y my client? We've citied cases, and t ere are cases we rely on from outside the juri but it's we cite this all d malicious clear from the many Flori arises from the common prosecution is des any times as an ancient cause of action 's all developed by the common law.AQ liance on foreign jurisdictions is not u especially when it's consistent with ion. a law. + +t the clearest discussion is in a case d Browning, which says that in reputational amages, which are particularly hard to prove, and there's no case that I've ever read where in a malicious prosecution case a plaintiff was put to the burden of bringing in an individual who said, "I didn't send my case to this lawyer because I heard he was accused of a crime." That, of course, + +1 2 would require, of course, months of trial to pull people in. But that's not our burden. + +3 4 6 7 THE COURT: Right. And we're not looking at a defamation case from the standpoint of publication, where publication is really part of it. So that's not what is being sought here in terms of t e expert testimony, as I understand it. + +8 9 10 MR. BURLINGTON: Well, we're see t prove the dissemination, as we would in case. amation + +11 12 13 14 15 THE COURT: Well, dis 9c on and recognized or acknowledged public£ re two different is what I'm t 'n to say. I'm essentially lcr agreeing with y I hink, in the sense that there's no e prove publication. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 Whe "publication," I'm talking about the nsump ion of that information by another party id that party's -- and the effect on that ner, or the effect on the person who agreed ith that material. You're speaking only to the issue of dissemination. + +22 23 24 25 MR. BURLINGTON: The Browning case says that the two primary factors in determining reputational damages are the gravity of the false allegations - and here we have a young, talented trial lawyer who + +1 2 3 4 is being accused not only of heinous crimes, but heinous crimes involving undermining the judicial system. And then the second factor noted in Browning, and it's cited in other cases, is the degree of exposure of the false allegations. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 And I've cited multiple cases in my brse that say that when courts have evaluated the excessiveness of a malicious prosecut on rd, one of the critical considerations is he egree of exposure of the false allegat And this is how we are doing it in the In g + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 \ i If we were 30, 40 a go and this was done ISS" and let's say it w I exposed in this area of .4 E the country, Pa Be h County, Broward, Miami, we would come i the newspaper's circulation to give the ome idea of the exposure. That does ly have much probative value in the tern t age. I + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 0 And Dr. Jansen is undisputedly qualified, robably more than anybody, to do this, and he explained how conservative his analysis was. And he's not going to tell the jury that the nine million six hundred hits means that nine million six hundred thousand people read this story and now believed that Brad is a criminal, and so + +forth and so on. + +And one of the factors here is a very wellrecognized principle of the Bigelow case, which is a U.S. Supreme Court case, that says that one of the fundamental principles of justice is that if a defendant engages in wrongful conduct that prates uncertainty as to damages, that falls o t~em.T You can't put the plaintiff to what is an ially impossible burden, assuming we pro e o r cause of action. And that, of course, issue that this trial will be all about. + +SS But they're tryin o really you can never ' prove reputational g without bringing in Joe Six Pack off th tr t and inquiring of him how 4 ,,me much of a gage e's holding against Brad because e allegations. That is simply not the standar + +it helpful to the jury? Well, the jury is o .going to understand the complexity of issemination of information on the Internet, and this witness is specifically qualified to do that. + +0 , ?ha + +> So when we go through the analysis is he qualified, is the issue relevant, is it helpful to the jury, we satisfy those three. + +Then we come to reasons to exclude. And the + +only reason I saw raised in their motion for excluding it was vague references to confusion. And I don't see how there could be confusion, given the clear parameters of what Dr. Jansen testified to were his directions, his methodology. There was ik terminology that he has to explain to the j 2r , but all experts do that in complex situation Th jury here would not be capable of mak analysis of the degree of dissemin do on the Internet as a matter of their on sense. + +THE COURT: I didn't e motion as suggesting a prior Dau lysis being required. + +MR. BURLINGTO sorry? + +THE COURT: 't read the motion filed by Mr. Link to 4jk bout his seeking a Frye or Daubert + +BURLINGTON: Correct. That's my reading welt, your Honor. + +Now, there was a little preamble, as i7>\hi...Veen on many motions here, about how this is all there has about a defamation action, and we've cited in our response the term "defamation" is a general term in the English language, and we've cited Miriam Webster, which is about as bread as you can get on a definition. + +7 L + +The fact that that term is used not only in describing certain parts of the task that was assigned to Dr. Jansen or in our argument regarding the nature of the damages, it's because that term properly applies to false statements of fact that accuse a person of criminal conduct, of bei g insane, being untrustworthy and so fort t s not in any way a suggestion that we a i ging a defamation action. + +The reputational damages ar clearly recognized by the Florida Court. They have been recognized as se intangible damages for which a jury h 7:S y given broad discretion. On the other ha t y have to be given l%7'n 41this context, the two primary ones as ational damages are the gravity of the Ise allegations and the degree of exposure. th t is exactly what this expert is qualified parameters. o~estify about. And there's been no suggestion s to what confusion there would be. And so, therefore, we believe we have satisfied the standard, and it's your discretion regarding the admission of his testimony. + +And to strike a witness entirely is the most extreme remedy that could be sought in this + +1 2 context, and we submit it is not appropriate and the motion should be denied. + +3 THE COURT: All right, thank you. + +4 Mr. Link, you have a few minutes to rebut. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I think a little bit of the confusion n the damages is there's really two standards. e standard for damages in a malicious p ion based on lack of probable cause in a c iminal action has per se damages. T e assumed, because if somebody makes gations that you are a criminal in the court and they have you arrested, then putation and your character are A i di ely impugned. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 This i v . In civil it requires damages proximat y sed. And it's not a Frye analysis, it's ot a aubert analysis, it's a basic does this t tor jury and is it a 403 issue, which is if I 0 n the stand and I say there were nine million its when in fact all he did was search for defamatory terms given to him by counsel without taking into consideration was it Mr. who spoke to the press, did he do a press release, when did these -- when were the -- when did the dissemination take place, did anybody read them, + +MR. LINK: Very briefly, Judge. + +Z 7e + +1 did it make any difference? + +2 3 4 One of the things Mr. has told us is he has no economic damages. His law firm has made substantially more money, or himself personally, since Mr. Epstein sued him than from before. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 So to say to the jury nine million hit ounds like nine million people are reading th' I believe that prejudice outweighs any, lue it might have, any relevance in this cti n, because he needs to show damages prox ly caused and not just put someone on the s talk about hits. + +12 Thank you, Judge. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 THE COURT: O \. S', was writing as we were speaking and ce in was anticipating Mr. Burling n t tate the well-known legal action that a r~uesf t o strike a witness is a drastic and extr e measure reserved only in rare Eli llti c~rrcum tances, especially where here we're dealing an expert which is otherwise qualified to a lebk. estify to what he's going to testify. And there being no Daubert or Frye analysis necessary, the Court would deny the motion. + +23 24 25 I would point out that many of the issues that were raised by Mr. Link both in his written motion and orally certainly can be effectively dealt with + +\ + +on cross-examination. But the core aspect of the Court's ruling today is that reputational damages and damages for humiliation are difficult to demonstrate to a jury, and the manner in which the plaintiff chooses to go about presenting that testimony, in this Court's view, is reasona in part to Dr. Jansen's proposed testimony. a ain, that motion is respectfully denied. O + +The next issue. + +MR. LINK: Judge, I thin t's 0 for 5. + +THE COURT: I don't a re. Never have and never will. I kno y it in gest, and I allowed it the las ithout a mention, but repeating it is ap opriate. + +MR. LI : dge, I'm sorry. It was not meant to be in late. + +S OLA: Your Honor, the next issue the Court relates to the plaintiff's Clement to an adverse inference instruction T?Ik. rising out of each of those circumstances where Jeffrey Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. The primary objection to the entitlement to an instruction really related to the content of the instruction. + +a + +And I have handed your Honor the adverse + +inference instruction based on Fifth Amendment assertions that we are requesting of the Court, which I suggest to your Honor is in direct conformity with the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Baxter versus Palmigiano and also conforms with the clarification in the case o Coquina Investments versus Rothstein. Interestingly, a matter related to scheme. th + +C .) And those two cases toge stand for the basic principle that you ase civil liability solely upon ertion of a Fifth ASS" Amendment privileg a ;; . u if a defendant confronted ;' r with evidence wins him in the context of a civil case refuse, wer questions that are relevant that civil case, then drawing an adverb inference based upon Fifth Amendment n is not required, but is permitted. 's exactly what this instruction says. and mate + +Your Honor is well aware of the broad array of questions to which Mr. Epstein has refused to provide answers, and it is of particular significance that those refusals occurred in the context of efforts to obtain discovery on the claim that Mr. Epstein himself asserted. + +Amendment concerns, if so ww I might also point out to the Co t there is a basic principle of law relati g tp admission V by silence. Separate and apa om Fifth it accusations under circ res where they have in 8' this case not only 'g but an obligation to speak up in res seco those accusations and they fail to say 'ng, that accounts to an admission by silen confronted with + +He filed a lawsuit intending not to provide any discovery with respect to the claims that he made and, carrying through on that intention, refusing to provide any discovery on those claims that he made. Under those circumstances, an adverse inference instruction is particular y appropriate. + +o based upon those two very fundamental es, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the Amendment protections do not apply in the ontext of civil litigation based upon the basic principle of admissions against silence, admission of a party opponent by silence. + +0 Icl?ak + +> We ask the Court approve this proposed instruction and permit us to comment upon Mr. Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment + +1 2 3 privilege in the context of this civil litigation in each context in which those assertions were made. + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 So it relates to his assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege with regard to the elements of the claim that he brought against El ks, it relates to his assertion of Fifth Ame nt privilege with regard to all question ing to his economic circumstances, it rel sjto his V assertion of the Fifth Amendm rivilege in every context in which he has a that privilege. + +12 Thank you, sir. + +13 THE COURT: + +14 15 16 Mr. Scarol thereference to Florida standard jury instrugtiQn 01.11, am I going to find this there? + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 OLA: What you're going to find there, or, is a spoliation instruction. And what done is we have adopted the spoliation Instruction, which is the closest standard in jury -- closest standard jury instruction to these circumstances. That is not an adverse inference instruction based upon Fifth Amendment. No such standard jury instruction exists. + +25 THE COURT: Well, I didn't think so. And + +thank you for that clarification. + +I'm surprised that there really aren't more cases that deal with this instruction in a civil context. And no Florida cases that you're aware of? + +MR. SCAROLA: Coquina is a Florida cas , your Honor. + +THE COURT: Well, it'S a Federal Ct Court case, not a Florida appellatCoprt case, which would be binding on thi + +All right. Counsel Epstein? + +MR. GOLDBERGER: et to stand. + +Good afternoory. a Goldberger on behalf of Mr. Epstein. + +Your H a general statement of the law, Mr. Scar correct. + +CO RT: Let me tell you where I have some i . Goldberger, with this. And Mr. Scarola O anyspeak to it as well, now that I understand its rigination. + +t ?h,, + +The first sentence I don't really have a problem with. The second sentence is where I have a problem. It says, quote, However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit when a person, based upon + +1 2 3 4 the Fifth Amendment, refuses to answer questions when evidence is offered against him which is relevant to the case, end quote. I don't think that's an accurate statement of the protection mechanism. + +6 7 8 9 MR. GOLDBERGER: I bracketed that myse your Honor, in the instructions Mr. Scarola me. And my concern may be a little differ -n the Court. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Whether that's accurate t, I don't want this jury to be thinking e right against self-incrimination app a criminal case and, therefore, he's gu everything that they're trying to get a dv se inference on. There simply is n nnect there. I don't know why we need to anything about a criminal case in this \*ury instruction other than Mr. Epstein under 1i!\* 6 Un'ted States Constitution cannot be compelled o~rovide evidence against himself in a crimina' 0 roceeding, period. + +21 22 23 24 25 And then, you know, and the guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, that's confusing, your Honor, and it's just going to inject criminal issues into this civil trial, and I think it's just + +t ?k' + +not necessary to the instruction that Mr. Scarola is seeking that this Court give to this jury. + +And then the second sentence, your Honor, address, However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit when a person, based on the Fifth Amendment, refuses to answer questions. I now where the Court is heading because th ires a balancing test at this point. + +Judge , by the way, • Honor, back in November of 2013 addresse •ery issue in an order that he entered. n 11 quote from it. This is Order on C Oar laintiff Motion to Deter e atus of Punitive Damage Discovery a p icability of Adverse Inference. And in t t o er, your Honor, your predecessor judg Judge , stated, "The counter-plaintiff, B dle I'm sorry -- "The 0 oagcer-plaintiff ' request for jury nstructions adverse inference instruction is deferred until the time of trial. And at the time of trial, upon specific analysis of the specific questions and answers, including those propounded in discovery, the Court will determine whether an adverse inference instruction will or will not be + +1 given." + +2 3 4 6 So I think what Judge meant in 2013 is that you can't determine what the instruction is going to be until such time as you hear the question, and then you must first do a 403 analysis. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 Well, first you must determine whe it s relevant, then you have to do a 403 a then you have to decide whether under t at 03 analysis and respecting the sanctity o invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, r an adverse inference instruction a opriate. + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 So for Mr. Scgso. simply ask you at this point to have a t instruction to give to this jury every based on every time Mr. Epstein invokes s F h Amendment privilege I do not beli e is a correct statement of the law. And I ld sk the Court to follow Judge order, he said I'm going to do it on a uestion-by-question basis. + +21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Well, a couple things. One is, again, presuming, without knowing, what was going through Judge mind at the time, but I would think that the likely contemplation was that by the time this case got to trial, whether it was in + +1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 2014, '15 and now '18, Mr. Epstein's criminal issues would have been behind him and that there was not at that particular juncture a need to rule on something that was probably potentially, at best, speculative. However, the time is now, so to speak, because we've gone through in painst detail most of those questions that the deemed relevant and that Mr. Epstein his Fifth Amendment privilege and, the efo e, the Court would find that an adverse in tion would be appropriate. + +12 13 14 15 The language that fault with, particularly in th sentence, will have to be ironed out aM de t with in a way that's going to be palat 51 the Court. + +16 17 18 19 You ert Xnly have the right, and it is a matt of aw in the civil context, that if you eri llir k t have an instruction provided to the jury on issue, it must be filed to preserve error. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 Ci Now, of course, if it was -- if it's deemed to be erroneous to give an instruction at all, then that requirement would be obviated. However, if you are seeking an order with the Court's stated intent that one will be given -- because as far as the Court is concerned, it is necessary based upon + +1 2 3 4 my rulings relative to the Fifth Amendment issue that I've already reviewed -- I'll be glad to review a proposed instruction that you and your team prepared. + +6 7 So at this time -- again, I'm going to give A the instruction. An instruction. The inst u tion is still up in the air in terms of the w 'ng. + +8 9 10 11 I'm comfortable with actually th sentence, I'm comfortable with the paragraph. It's the second paragraph that will need s AV ce in the first anged. + +12 13 14 15 16 17 MR. SCAROLA: May your Honor, becaus est a language change, k I understand - although your H r bars not articulated the concern, I ' AgEk 'n erereading that second sentence, I unders it could be of concern. The Fifth ent -- + +18 19 20 21 COURT: The concern potentially is the f rk 1 et statement that protection that applies in a lel`, riminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit. + +22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. I understand that. What I suggest for consideration by the Court and opposing counsel, instead of the instruction reading, "However, the protection that applies in a + +1 2 3 4 criminal proceeding does not apply," it should read, "However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit," et cetera. That's the part that does not apply. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 You still have your Fifth Amendment protection; however, you don't have pro against an adverse inference. That's intended to say. It's not said as rly as it should be, so I suggest that "However, the prohibition adverse inference that 8iSr proceeding does no 1 in a civil lawsuit," et cetera. anguage read, drawing an in a criminal + +15 16 17 18 MR. GO B R R: Your Honor, I accept what Mr. Scarola tr ng to clarify, but I also accept your nvita ion to come up with our own instruction tirmilv thi point. + +19 20 MR. SCAROLA: I just want to be sure our + +21 22 23 24 i7l>Nkt\_groposal is on the table. And that's what it is. THE COURT: However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference -- so we'll eliminate the word "protection" and substitute "prohibition against drawing an adverse inference." + +25 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, which I believe is an + +7 L + +and your team. But again, your invitation remains. I'll be glad to take into consideration any propose It instruction that you provide me, Mr. Go + +absolutely exact statement of the law. + +THE COURT: All right. I certainly can live with that more so than I could letting that sentence stand as it was. + +0 But again, I'm ruling that ad{(ersg instruction is abundantly necessary, with uestion. And, therefore, one will be giv, + +But again, I will you to prepare one for the Court's co i ion. + +MR. GOLDBE hanks, Judge. That's obviously s o relevancy. Obviously. + +THE I'll put on the record for you so that where `s no equivocation, I understand that nket objection is to giving an adverse uction at all. That is recognized, and it's verruled. + +However, as I said, as a substitute, my understanding of the law to be is it will be necessary now that the Court has ruled, unless you simply want to stand on your blanket objection, that an alternative instruction must be given for + +1 2 the Court to consider so as to preserve further your objection. + +3 4 So at this time -- again, I'm going to give the instruction. An instruction. The instruction is still up in the air in terms of the wording. + +6 7 8 9 I'm comfortable with actually the firs sentence, I'm comfortable with the seco paragraph. It's the second sentence first paragraph that will need to be cha + +10 11 12 13 14 15 MR. SCAROLA: May I sugg language change, your Honor, because I thirt y erstand - although your Honor ha col fl ticulated the concern, I think i ing that second sentence, I understand ho E 't uld be of concern. The Fifth Ag Amendment - - + +16 17 18 19 t%') THE OU The concern potentially is the blan t sta ement that protection that applies in a cy4min proceeding does not apply in a civil it. + +20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. I understand that. what I suggest for consideration by the Court and opposing counsel, instead of the instruction reading, "However, the protection that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply," it should read, "However, the prohibition against drawing an + +1 2 3 adverse inference that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit," et cetera. That's the part that does not apply + +4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 You still have your Fifth Amendment protection; however, you don't have protection against an adverse inference. That's what intended to say. It's not said as clear s t should be, so I suggest that the lang ad, "However, the prohibition against adverse inference that applie a ng an criminal proceeding does not apply vil lawsuit," ACe' et cetera. + +13 14 15 16 ASc MR. GOLDBERGE . o t Honor, I accept what Mr. Scarola is tryi to larify, but I also accept Acre your invita o come up with our own instruction at this + +17 18 R. SCAROLA: I just want to be sure our c ;rpv p pos is on the table. And that's what it is. + +19 20 21 22 ? l — THE COURT: However, the prohibition against Ls...drawing an adverse inference -- so we'll eliminate the word "protection" and substitute "prohibition against drawing an adverse inference." + +23 24 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, which I believe is an absolutely exact statement of the law. + +25 THE COURT: All right. I certainly can live + +1 2 with that more so than I could letting that sentence stand as it was. + +3 4 6 But again, your invitation remains. I'll be glad to take into consideration any proposed instruction that you provide me, Mr. Goldberger, and your team. + +7 8 9 But again, I'm ruling that adverse ru tion is abundantly necessary, without ques io And, therefore, one will be given. + +10 11 But again, I will invite to prepare one for the Court's considera + +12 13 14 A MR. SCAROLA: You 1 7 we thank you very much for your gene u a, otment of time today. Look forward to ei you on Tuesday. + +15 THE CO s my pleasure. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Aga all have done a superb job in both your written and oral presentations. I appreciate ilent argument. As I've mentioned in the C5 if I had the pleasure of dealing with ttorneys of all of your caliber each and every day, I wouldn't have the headaches that I do physically and figuratively. + +23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, for planning purposes, are we going to be conducting an initial screening on Tuesday, having jurors fill out the + +questionnaire and then returning for voir dire on Wednesday? The initial screening I would think would include hardship challenges and also questions with regard to anyone's familiarity with the underlying circumstances of this case. + +THE COURT: That's something that we'r oing to have to discuss, and I guess the bes e o do it is now. Take a little bit more ti + +Madam court reporter, are you oka with a few more minutes? + +THE REPORTER: Sure. + +THE COURT: My th S Tis that likely it will h " be necessary to pr i 'nS ily individually question the venire pane q going to have a hundred. + +A4. 7eYes, sir. MR. SC + +THE I know that will be time cons ing, but based upon the Dippolito case, and t 's h oing some parallels as far as the publicity a s7ects are concerned and the nature of the llegations and admissions that we're dealing with here, that it's incumbent upon the Court to individually question each of the initial venire members as to their knowledge of the individuals involved in this case. Those are my thoughts preliminarily. + +1 MR. SCAROLA: May I make a suggestion? + +2 3 4 THE COURT: Sure. Whoever is going to primarily conduct voir dire, why don't you come up to the podium so I can hear from you and you don't have to jump up and down. + +6 7 8 9 MR. SCAROLA: We've proposed a juror questionnaire and I think that we're pro y ose in terms of the content of that juror questionnaire. + +10 THE COURT: I haven't se . + +11 12 13 MR. SCAROLA: If we' ere already, we're close in terms oh ontents of that questionnaire. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 THE COURT: (<4SK h : en't seen it yet, so that's a bit of a di a age for me because this is somethin th t goes unmentioned, but certainly it is m hilosophy in most of the cases that I handle of the cases when I'm dealing with C5 xogptionally competent lawyers, once voir dire is ver, there's little that the jury hears from me. You are the ones who are going to be essentially steering this trial, and I leave it to competent, experienced attorneys when it comes to stipulations. + +25 And the Fourth has reiterated that in a recent + +interim order relinquishing jurisdiction on an unrelated case -- a case that goes back to 1995, actually -- and emphasize in that interim order the significance of counsel's stipulation. And so I'm here to make determinations of law, rule, where necessary, but the conduct of the trial is go ng to largely depend upon lead counsel. + +So if you guys formulate a quest on il e of a preliminary manner that you can ag ee n, you got it. I'm more than willing to de to that. And if that is sufficient in w to satisfy the SO issue of pretrial publ' t 'knowledge of the S' circumstances, kno e f any the participants, things of that tur that are critical to the analysis, tk n t 's satisfactory to me. + +MR. is t t once the group is assembled, the Court deal dship issues in whichever way your Honor arily deals with hardship issues. Anyone who s not asserting a hardship for which they are seeking to be excused and anyone who does not express any knowledge with regard to Epstein or Rothstein, which I think are the two broad categories that we need to address. : Well, my suggestion, your Honor, + +THE COURT: I'm not as concerned with + +1 2 3 Rothstein particularly now as I am, as I was - really -- I've never really been concerned with Rothstein. + +4 6 7 MR. SCAROLA: From my perspective, we can limit it to any knowledge with regard to Epstein. And I would think this is the defense's prima concern as well. + +8 9 THE COURT: Or Mr. The ne million hits, apparently. + +10 11 12 13 14 C.) MR. SCAROLA: Well, that' ue. I think those names should be mad to the jurors. Anyone who recognizes mes and anyone who has a hardship rem be individually questioned. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 With r a question ire li l)and they are asked to fill out those e the others, they are given ques onnaires, and then they are excused for the b Ianc of the day. If someone survives individual a ue~tioning, they're given a copy of the uestionnaire, they fill that out, and they're excused for the balance of the day. + +22 23 24 25 THE COURT: All right. So let me stop you there so I'm understanding. The questionnaire that you're proposing would be after the initial issues regarding knowledge of any of the participants in + +1 this case? + +2 3 4 MR. LINK: That's what I envisioned, your Honor. And I think Rothstein, Epstein all have to be part of that dialogue. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: I don't have a problem either way. + +7 8 9 10 THE COURT: That's fine. Certainl '117have the opportunity to question them furt f they say they have heard of Scott Roths ein we will be able to drill down further in at inquiry. + +11 12 13 14 15 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, s one who has not heard of any of those eople and does not have a hardship fi the questionnaire, leaves with instructio to eturn the following morning. Everybody e e i ubject to individual voir dire. + +16 17 18 19 20 THE I'm thinking about it the other way, nd I'm thinking the individual voir dire has tp.com at the initial point of whether or not any Cif hese people have any knowledge of the rotagonists here. + +21 22 23 24 MR. SCAROLA: Well, it would. The only people who are excused are those who have no hardship concern to raise and don't know any of the three people. + +25 THE COURT: But the knowledge of the people + +has to come first. + +MR. LINK: It does, your Honor. You have the sequence correct. + +THE COURT: Because then hardship becomes a non-issue. + +MR. SCAROLA: That's fine. + +THE COURT: Okay? It's the degree he r knowledge, if any, that will have to t with first. If they have knowledge of na ure that results in an immediate cause lenge, then we no longer have to get into a e other issues. + +MR. SCAROLA: But a our Honor envision two separate individual/ ires? + +THE COURT: + +MR. SC So you would want to identify everybod ho, as knowledge and everybody who is clai pg a 7iardship. + +c5c . fivalification ncorrect, forgive me for the late hour. COURT: Has knowledge of a nature. And if the grammar is + +So, yes, it would be only those who would be -- who would have knowledge that would subject them to disqualification. + +MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: After that, I see no issue because + +the group. "Sdone MR. SCAROLA: I agree that needs C + +The bottom line is that initial screening process screening process is n who survive the ecause the ssary for them or they have come in, been vDdually questioned and they still qualify, se eople all fill out a juror me tie re they leave for the day and ed after filling out the questionnai they're ques onnaire to return the following morning. + +I have done it before and have had remarkable results using now Chief Judge Gerber's, then Judge Gerber here in the Circuit Court, his voir dire colloquy on hardship. It's excellent. And it is one that I've had very, very good success utilizing. And I have done it in a group. d the group setting is actually better. + +COURT: What are you envisioning -- what ou both envisioning on this questionnaire? + +MR. SCAROLA: All of the basic information that takes a long time to gather on an individual basis that we won't need to gather individually; demographic information, marital status, job history -- + +THE COURT: So you think it would be better + +1 2 3 with 100 -- let's use 80 as a round number -- 80 people -- it would be better -- and, Mr. Link, I want your thoughts on the subject, too. + +4 MR. LINK: Yes, sir. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 THE COURT: It would be better to give them k l the questionnaire, have them fill it out in o r 443-osio at you all could evaluate this informati opposed to going through the standard ques ion aire that I have here, which is one we al with demographic information, the name, pl omicile, occupation, marital st s ouse's occupation, adult child occupa for jury service, parties to any pending pa law suits, similar criminal, A . ., knowing any e S the courtroom -- we'll basically take tha outl f the equation -- and can you and will ou be a fair juror in the case? presence and then dismiss them for the + +18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 me SCAROLA: Yes. We include all that 16 <4;r. n rmation. We request some additional 0 iti ?6\_ nformation as well. They fill out the questionnaires, the questionnaires are gathered, multiple copies are made, the Court has one, each side has a copy or more, if they choose to order them, and we then have a chance to look at them overnight and come back the following day and focus + +1 2 our voir dire on those questions that need to be asked. + +3 4 THE COURT: I'd like to reserve my right to ask the fairness question, so I don't want that included in the questionnaire. + +6 MR. SCAROLA: That's fine. + +7 8 9 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Just procedurally, r Honor, I just did this in a case rece i this circuit, and the procedure request d b Mr. Scarola is close to what we did. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 After the individual ough, they A survived the cut, they lied out the questionnaire, act 1 wn in the jury assembly room. They col to the questionnaires for us, they gave u pies overnight, and we came back the next it worked pretty well. + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 COURT: Okay. So that will be fine. So 11 do on Tuesday is the 100 people that be assembled -- we'll be doing jury selection so report there at 9:30 on Tuesday morning -- we will go ahead and individually speak to the jurors outside the presence of the remainder. I don't want to do it with the noise. As I said, that would be headache producing within minutes. 11A, + +MR. SCAROLA: Easiest is just go into the jury room. + +THE COURT: I think that's the best way to do it. + +And you'll individually question each of the panel after I have introduced everyone, aft r I've had the opportunity to make them as comf bl as possible and to explain what we're do why - want to hint at anything -- some may nize the name right off the bat -- but to them that we have agreed that we wig ion each of you individually so as out only preliminary information con ni the matter at hand, and leave it pr t ch at that. not why we're doing it, because I + +And he e'll go over with them if they have any owle ge of Mr. , Mr. Epstein or the hst 'n matter. And I think that's the better to do it. + +Obviously, the reason for my doing it, even though it has not come under attack or objection, is because I don't want the entire 100 people to be tainted by one person spouting something that may be of the nature that could arise here. So to avoid that operation -- and, you know, it should be + +pointed out and always keep in mind the cost to summon people to jury service is extraordinarily high, and so we don't want to waste the taxpayers' money in that respect as well. + +All right. So again, I want to thank and commend each of you for your presentations o ay, all that participated either directly o ir ctly in the presentation of all of your Thank you to our courtroom personn 1, hank you to our staff attorney, who's bee isting me. And I wish you all a pleasant ev, + +MS. ROCKENBACH: t or, you almost got SCS" away. I just have o bsed order on the motion S ( 0 to stay that yo Ho r denied earlier, can S AlZsme approach. v a copy to Mr. Scarola just a moment a if + +CO RT: Yes. What you can do tomorrow on tantive motions -- I'll be at the Bench Bar C otfference and you have my permission to track me own. Our schedules are posted, so you'll know where I'll be. But I'll be doing the civil presentations during the afternoon. There's two of them. So I'll be able to be reached there. + +MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much, your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you again. Have a great + +rest of the week. Thank you again to our courtroom +personnel. We'll be in recess. + +(Thereupon at 4:50 p.m., the hearing was +concluded.) + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### CERTIFICATE + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PALM BEACH. + +I, Elaine V. Registered Professional Reporter, State of Florida at large, do hereby cer ify that I was authorized to and did report the abov hearing at the time and place herein stated, an t it is a true and correct transcription of my st notes taken during said hearing. + +I further certify that I am n a q ney or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a r lative or employee of any attorney or counsel of connected with the action, nor am I financia nterested in the action. + +The foregoing certi c n of this transcript does not apply to any repro t of the same by any means unless under the dime co trol and/or direction of the certifying repor . + +IN WITNESS hand this 9th day F, I have hereunto set my h. 2018. + +Elaine V. illiams Notary Pub n and for the State of Florida My Co ssi Expires 03/27/21 My CQ ssion #GG 72248 + +ORDERED a Is Southern District of Florida on 91) 1 O + +![](_page_257_Picture_2.jpeg) + +c417?Valeia, + +Raymond B. Ray. Judge United States Bankruptcy Court + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COU SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLO Fort Lauderdale Divisio www.11sb.uscourts. + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +Debtor. + +. 09-34791-RBR + +ER 11 + +### AGREED ORDER- LUNG HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED RDER (DE 1068) AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE.ERODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO HI UESTS FILED B INTERESTED PARTY LEHRMAN P.L. + +The S fo Rchef From Amended Order (D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay f ction of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party =, e, Weissing,S., Fistos & Lehrman, P.L a"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Burnett, P.A., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with numbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special MI and an identical set to + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +who will use same to create its privilege log. 1= - agrees to prepare that portion of the privilege log relating to emails on or before December 15, 2010, with the remaining portion due thirty days from the date of this order, subject to other courtaa= will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any im caes,or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of = = co ielould it be determined that=a or Epstein retained images or copies of subj ct documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to awa y ons in favor of=, Brad or his client. + +As such, the Motion for Relief is deemed m e hearing set on the Motion for Relief [D.E. 1146] set for November 30, 2010%c reby cancelled. The court reserves jurisdiction to tax fees and costs related to the preparation of the privilege log upon filing of a proper motion and hearing thereon. t e, + +# # # + +Submitted by: + +Seth Lehrman, Esq. , JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel.: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 sethri/Matlitoiustice.com + +Seth Lehrman, Esq. who is directed to serve this Order to all parties of interest and to file a Certificate of Service. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7377ee36d6d4c4711f990c4cb52fbdfd0dcca6ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/EFTA02767344.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,9339 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 259, + "chars": 934632, + "elapsed_seconds": 155.33, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_257_Picture_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF/CCHEM DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE' RELEVANCE AND NON-\nPRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, AND RI UEST FOR ADDITIONAL \nLIMITED DISCOVERY EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND APPOINTMENT OF \nAND THE UPPLEMENTT I THAT M TI N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 531.1319580078125, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 531.1319580078125, + 383.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 383.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 545.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 545.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RELEVANT FA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Discovery Orders Violatal by Epstein \nN14/....\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 291.2457580566406, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 291.2457580566406, + 484.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 484.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TimeliJcQ 1Le nrivileaed materials at issue", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 298.5347595214844, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 298.5347595214844, + 583.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 583.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 367.11444091796875, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 367.11444091796875, + 445.10302734375 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 445.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. This Court should \nreaddress this issue whi cu\u2022 ) l has ready decided.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 506.19659423828125, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 506.19659423828125, + 307.6125183105469 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 307.6125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. The deadline to amend exhibit lists has long since passed.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 403.8846435546875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 403.8846435546875, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. did not waive his work product objec .", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 377.3999938964844, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 377.3999938964844, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "r\nd. Edwar pri ege log was not inadequate and did not waive work product \nP", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 476.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 476.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 544.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 544.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. Epstein's Belated Claims that there is no privilege fails.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 394.7912902832031, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 394.7912902832031, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6. Epstein should not be rewarded for violating the bankruptcy court order requiring \nthat neither he nor his attorney maintain the emails in question.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 71.4375 + ], + [ + 544.0698852539062, + 71.4375 + ], + [ + 544.0698852539062, + 99.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 99.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 514.2324829101562 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 514.2324829101562 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VOLUME I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 195.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 214.64999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 COURT CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 176.25599999999997, + 417.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "W", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 260.01 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 260.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED EX IBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0087890625, + 362.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN DE OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 375.068359375, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 375.068359375, + 445.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 445.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nPaul Visoski, Jr. and (2) Da Ac r\na. L.M. (9 \u2022 9/10) \nL.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 \net\ntco \n, all court filings referenced therein and \n.Sek", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 466.956, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 466.956, + 618.03 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 618.03 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein \n17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 506.1705017089844, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 506.1705017089844, + 185.362548828125 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 185.362548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In re O % Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA \nUSBC S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-34791-RB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 265.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 466.7724914550781, + 265.0250244140625 + ], + [ + 466.7724914550781, + 298.2325134277344 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 298.2325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United S 6f America v. Scott Rothstein \u2014 Forfeiture Action \nDC $D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 469.7486877441406, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 469.7486877441406, + 522.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 522.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 375.718994140625, + 605.88 + ], + [ + 375.718994140625, + 621.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 621.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 332.92800000000005, + 409.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 409.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.38067626953125, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.38067626953125, + 606.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 606.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS TRANSCRIPT O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 346.1690368652344 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 402.5552062988281 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 402.5552062988281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.964, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 84.463134765625 + ], + [ + 242.964, + 84.463134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 256, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 84.59210205078125 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 84.59210205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COU \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLO \nFort Lauderdale Divisio \nwww.11sb.uscourts.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 401.47200000000004, + 344.2145690917969 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 344.2145690917969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER- LUNG HEARING ON MOTION \nFOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED RDER (DE 1068) AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE.ERODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE \nTO HI UESTS FILED B INTERESTED PARTY \nLEHRMAN P.L.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 257, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 501.84000000000003, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 507.87 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 242 + ], + [ + "Line", + 117 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 300 + ], + [ + "Line", + 146 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 271 + ], + [ + "Line", + 135 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 311 + ], + [ + "Line", + 148 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Text", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 173 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 296 + ], + [ + "Line", + 149 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 273 + ], + [ + "Line", + 129 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 273 + ], + [ + "Line", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 146 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Text", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 300 + ], + [ + "Line", + 147 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 319 + ], + [ + "Line", + 155 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 282 + ], + [ + "Line", + 131 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 277 + ], + [ + "Line", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 269 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 252 + ], + [ + "Line", + 121 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 271 + ], + [ + "Line", + 135 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 288 + ], + [ + "Line", + 142 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 151 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 162 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 195 + ], + [ + "Line", + 86 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 299 + ], + [ + "Line", + 146 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 288 + ], + [ + "Line", + 137 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 283 + ], + [ + "Line", + 140 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 312 + ], + [ + "Line", + 144 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 144 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 297 + ], + [ + "Line", + 145 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 247 + ], + [ + "Line", + 122 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "Text", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 305 + ], + [ + "Line", + 149 + ], + [ + "Text", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 150 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 153 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 198 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 301 + ], + [ + "Line", + 149 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 285 + ], + [ + "Line", + 138 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 298 + ], + [ + "Line", + 143 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 314 + ], + [ + "Line", + 152 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 140 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 277 + ], + [ + "Line", + 132 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 316 + ], + [ + "Line", + 151 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 188 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 69 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 244 + ], + [ + "Line", + 119 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 276 + ], + [ + "Line", + 134 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 272 + ], + [ + "Line", + 131 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 155 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 200 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 601 + ], + [ + "Line", + 298 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 137 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 185 + ], + [ + "Line", + 91 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 195 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 215 + ], + [ + "Line", + 168 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 258, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767344" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/_page_257_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/_page_257_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e4a33750d265279a1bdc1e207eb8321ed3e56bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767344/_page_257_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c3874bfccfe28c0f2f1cc3010bdd8acb213903f5d7b77f62493e650843a4b6d5 +size 8771 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6a4b95d35cb8cc1c7089f956339291f911a260c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.md @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +Defendants. + +RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFE 1 ANT JE Y EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL COUNTER-PLAINTIFF NUMBERS OF DOCUIVIENTS PRODUCED + +C by ttd through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response in Opposition to Defendant 3t:'l y Eistein's Motion to Compel to Identify Numbers of Documents Prod9c,ed tbefeto, and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +In 2012, filed bis privilege log in the underlying lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") against Edwat4Scott Rothstein, and victim L.M. Although Epstein made some effort to challenge th Privilege log in early 2012, he (through his prior counsel, eventually debited these discovery issues and instead chose to voluntarily dismiss all of his claim on the eve of a summary judgment hearing, without ever having filed any opposition. As the barrage of recent motions demonstrates, Epstein's new trial counsel does not agree with litigation strategy decision in this matter. + +Now, six years later, after discovery has been closed since November 2017 and two (2) trial dates have been continued at the request of Epstein, Epstein's new trial counsel seeks to + +relitigate waived discovery issues in order to continue wasting Court resources and to ensure that no jury is ever impaneled to decide malicious prosecution counterclaim. Epstein's newest tactic? Motion practice requesting that a counsel review discovery production in the underlying case that occurred over five years ago to "identify by number the documents that [were] produced in this case." If Epstein's new trial counsel would like to knov t Epstein's former trial counsel knew — which documents were produced to them in this- they should contact the numerous prior attorneys that have represented Epstein ceeding. Or they should consult with their co-counsel, Jack Goldberger, Esq., who h counsel of record for years in this case. In any event, it is simply not the responsibi wards' counsel to perform -\*/ document review for Epstein's trial counsel, of documents already reviewed by a counsel \ ... 7 years ago. + +Moreover, has already s identified by number the 49 privileged documents that Epstein obtained in a Federal bankruptcy court order and attempted to list as exhibits the week befo the ies' March 13, 2018 trial date. Those documents are identified in the chart bel 1? which 4," was included in a Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits an to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materia Listed on a Privilege Log, which the Court granted at the March 8, 2018 preArtal heating: + +| Number of Privileged Emails in Epstein's Possession (49 TOTAL) | Numbers from Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibit #13 | Number/Range on February 23, 2011 Privilege Log | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 02645 | 02633-02646 | +| 1 | 00149 | 00149 | + +| | 01527 | 01527 | +|-------|-------------|-----------------------------------| +| 1 | 04493 | 04491-04518 | +| | 04494 | 04494 | +| 1 | 00090 | | +| 1 | 00026 | | +| 1 | 01004 | | +| | | 004 c5)1 3 8000-08011 01003-01005 | +| 1 | | 26479-26481 26479-26481 | +| 3 \z* | 03731 | 03719-03736 | +| | 06406-06408 | 06404-06408 | +| | 01686 | 01686 | +| | 11123-11125 | 11123-11136 | +| | 11126 | 11126 | +| 1 | 25925 | 25925 | +| 1 | 25874 | 25874 | +| | 11145 | 11143-11146 | + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of [REDACTED] Number. + +| 1 | 03191 | 03191-03196 | +|---|-------------|-------------| +| 5 | 04398-04402 | 04387-04402 | +| 5 | 04408-04412 | 04403-04416 | +| 1 | 267476 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 08042 | 08033-08070 | +| 1 | 26741 | 26741-26763 | +| 3 | 08059-08061 | 08033-08070 | +| 3 | 26756-26758 | 26741-26763 | +| 3 | 08036-08038 | 08033-08070 | +| 1 | 26762 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 01117 | 01112-01117 | +| 3 | 08121-08123 | 08118-08123 | +| 4 | 26749-26752 | 26741-26763 | +| 3 | 08128-08130 | 08124-08156 | +| 3 | 08118-08120 | 08118-08123 | +| 3 | 08131-08133 | 08124-08156 | +| 3 | 08124-08126 | 08124-08156 | +| 4 | 08135-08138 | 08124-08156 | +| 1 | 27494 | 27494 | +| 1 | 26760 | 26741-26763 | +| 1 | 25997 | 25997 | +| 1 | 25937 | 25937 | +| 2 | 26604-26605 | 26604-26605 | + +| 3 | 07019-07021 | 07019-07024 | +|---|-------------|-------------| +| | | | + +Lastly, the time-consuming exercise Epstein is requesting counsel to perform is one that he can complete himself It would require starting with the filed privilege log, which clearly indicates all documents by produced documents. number which were, at that time eld from production on the basis of an assertion of privilege. Later, a category of doc ts consisting of approximately 163 pages of emails on the privilege log were orde uced and those documents were then produced. The combination of all 7I viel not included on the privilege log plus the 163 pages that were later ordered to C d comprises the universe of + +For the foregoing r deny Epstein's motion. \? if respectfully requests that the Court + +\- 1 + +( S" + +Sy + +## onclusion + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of [REDACTED]'s Number. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve +to all Counsel on the attached list, this Au day of July, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +KAREN E. TERRY +Florida Bar No.: 45780 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of [REDACTED]'s Number. + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ded1d52db21b223f7105a10a9c9e83928512a14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603/EFTA02767603.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767603.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 8459, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.56, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.7593994140625, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 537.7593994140625, + 110.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 110.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "onclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.4, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 338.86822509765625, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 338.86822509765625, + 437.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 275.4, + 437.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767603" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9825c05bfb5fa1d9687289087bf56e54562c1ceb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE + +Plaintiff, J. by and thr i t rsigned counsel, hereby files this written objection to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein' for Judicial Notice filed February 2,2018. Although does not object taking judicial notice for purposes of authenticity only of specifically identif Court cases, including but not limited ,,i : iiiir reserves all other objections, + +- (1) Violation of the Court's Order prohibiting the listing of exhibits by categories and requiring the parties to separately identify all individual documents; +- (2) Faihre to timely disclose the exhibits +- (3) Relevancy and materiality +- (4) Hearsay +- (5) Rule 403 + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Objection to Request for Judicial Notice Page 2 of 4 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this ciiWk day of Jam, 2018. + +> JA CAROLA Florida Bar No.: 16 DAVID P. VITALE Rt. Florida Bar No.: 11517 Attorney E-Mails: mmccann@se Primary E-M Searcy De 2139 P West O SA G ylaw.com and eam@searcylaw.com a Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard , Florida 33409 P 686-6300 y for + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Objection to Request for Judicial Notice +Page 3 of 4 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Objection to Request for Judicial Notice +Page 4 of 4 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c0a59661ae5391c4ffd710b4ae5783a32bcc9be --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610/EFTA02767610.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767610.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2922, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S \nREQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.568, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 453.0088195800781, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 453.0088195800781, + 357.363037109375 + ], + [ + 161.568, + 357.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 155.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767610" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c678325837b63af072da392810f2130d673d2ef6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.md @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +VS. + +Plaintiff(s), + +O + +Defendant(s). + +C C + +C + +## NOTICE OF ILEA &M + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Bicfrundersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: August 15, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable id Hafele + +PLACE: 20 er4s,Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Jeffrey Epstein's Responses and Objections to Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces Tecum + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephonelAh -Mlt the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 31st day of July, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Hearing + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +--- + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +ADV. EPSTEIN + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Hearing + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn tajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +, Sp ee + +Rev: 8/2 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46297bc67177fd104f19fcc2e1221a2f695757ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614/EFTA02767614.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767614.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5150, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF ILEA &M", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 364.6125183105469 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 364.6125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 280.6082458496094, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 280.6082458496094, + 585.8524932861328 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 585.8524932861328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767614" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d451e5946f2730f5be73d4a3666c8bc68f5e3b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifflCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF POST PONEME O LIAGIC HEARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the h uled before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm ,, h ..., ty Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom I OD, West Palm Beac ' 401, on the following is hereby postponed: + +MOTION: Defen Complain Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended + +DATE: Au4 7r, 2018 + +TIME6SA5 a.m. (UMC) + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August I, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Su 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 + +By: /s/ Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN + +Kara Berard Rocken N 44903) + +Primary: Sco aw com + +Primary: ocklaw.com + +Secon m + +Seco linkrocklaw.com + +nsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea6996860e3e8a6b45e0957372233f8ec0a928da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619/EFTA02767619.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767619.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 8125, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF POST PONEME O LIAGIC HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 450.4038391113281, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 450.4038391113281, + 362.9830627441406 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 362.9830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767619" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a82008ebd6b83e25b6f8b692ba3322860d460a11 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifVCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET H (Cancels Hearings on August 2 a i 8) + +A + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the matters no are specially set for hearing on August 22 and 231. 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before n cable Donald W. Hafele, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie High vklicWes alm Beach, Florida, Courtroom I0D: + +| No. | Motion/Request | | +|-----|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Date Filed | Document | +| 1 | 10/5/17 | Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against [REDACTED] and His Counsel [D.E. 1009] | +| 2 | 11/13/17 | Edwards' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1051] | +| | 11/17/17 | Edwards' Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence [D.E. 1077] | +| 3 | 12/4/17 | Edwards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V only; Section I addressed at 12/7/17 hearing) [D.E. 1100 and 1101]
[Heard on 12/7/17, but not completed] | +| | 12/4/17 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege [D.E. 1102 and 1103] | + +The parties are currently set for hearing before the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court on August 23 and 24, 2018. The parties anticipate that hearing will only take one day and they will request that it commence on August 24, 2018, in order to allow the matters set forth herein to be heard before this Court on August 23, 2018. + +| No. | Date | Motion/Request | +|-----|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 4 | 12/11/17 | Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of | +| 5 | 12/22/17 1/25/18 2/22/18 3/7/18 | | +| 6 | 1/10/18 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated ttlements | +| | | -- Motion was denied as to three clients on 2/28/18, | +| 7 | 1/18/18 | Motion in Limine Addressing the Adrnissibili it No. 132 | +| 8 | 2/1/18 | Epstein's Motion in Limine on Newly Di lo rial Exhibits and | +| | | to Exclude Deposition Testimony of Witnesses Wh e Not Deposed in this Matter [D.E. 1176] | +| 9 | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice [ . 1 | +| 10 | 2/12/18 | Second Motion to Lift 9anfiden ity Designation of Epstein's | +| II | 2/26/18 | Motion to Com equest for Admissions [D.E. 1225] | +| 12 | 3/2/18 | Motion in L e to mit the Introduction of Evidence Alleged to | +| | | Support Epstein's inst [D.E. 1243] | +| 13 | 3/2/18 | Epstein's Mon its Permission to Alter Trial Evidence to Comply | +| | | with Rule 2. 5 [D . 1241] | +| 14 | 3/2/18 | Epstei 's Motio or Court's Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing | +| | | Names itials of Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] | +| 15 | 3/5/18 | '4, otion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature | +| | | o .4 uments and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary | +| | | d ' ppointment of Special [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] [D.E. 1319] | +| | 4/5/18 | Epstein's Supplemental Authority [D.E. 1320] | +| 16 | 3/26/18 | Motion to Change Case Caption [D.E. 1305] | +| 17 | 3/29/18 | Epstein's Motion to Address Scheduling and Professionalism [D.E. 1309] | +| 18 | 4/3/18 4/6/18 | | + +| No. | Date | Motion/Request | +|-----|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 19 | 4/27/18 | Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List [D.E. 1334]; Supplement [D.E. 1341] | +| 20 | 4/29/18 | Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness [D.E. 1335] | +| 21 | 5/2/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify his Trial Witnesses [D.E. 1338] | +| 22 | 6/21/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify Numbers o | + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished t the ca ) eys listed on the Service List below on August 1, 2018, through the Court's e-filing po uant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + ++6s + +LINK & R VCH, PA 1555 Pal es Boulevard, Suite 930 West , Florida 33401 (56\ ; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +s/ on J. Link + +\* + +Ott J. Link (FBN 602991) + +re Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Trov\_®jinkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearapce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvälida que necesita algun acomoditmiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene der ,ti si tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la am ili I de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Wes Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo i no 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunal iatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el dempo ant a omparecencia que se ha S programado es menos de 7 Was; si usted apacitacion del oido o de la voz, Name al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kon ameriken Id Enfim yo na Highway, West Palm Bea jou anvan dat ou ge apre ou fin res mwens ke 7 Ò 'o ; ed akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan enn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou my Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou 'al Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie onda 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 evou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman nvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecf09179d1ba1e4cce10bcf47f101c8975408c5a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622/EFTA02767622.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767622.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 14832, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.310546875, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.310546875, + 100.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 100.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET H \n(Cancels Hearings on August 2 a i 8)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.108, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 421.36566162109375, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 421.36566162109375, + 321.363037109375 + ], + [ + 189.108, + 321.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 254.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 254.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 72.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 72.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767622" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..292560bf6dd9c5539b232d2a4bb4d9d9fa765569 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.md @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTH TE • ividually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +A Cos + +## NOTICE OF IcRIN + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t S dersigncd has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: August 15, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 am. + +JUDGE: Honorable Hafele + +PLACE: 2401(cixie righsvay, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPECI TTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion for Clarification of Trial Order + +![](_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg) + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +\_\_\_\_\_ *Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ *One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 3rd day of AUGUST, 2018. + +![]()[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification it the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen 4 wo ..y pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +O \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0959891403645b174f93411d6dbb721750596fe5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/EFTA02767627.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4690, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.29, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 71.5150146484375 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 71.5150146484375 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF IcRIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 362.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 362.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECI TTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 277.9461364746094, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 277.9461364746094, + 582.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 582.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767627" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fda1216c8cf1dcdcd320b7d736f6d2b06ca80c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767627/_page_0_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:22a9d73c55c5309f77da74c356a86809f4ab19d3fb8c414d57fb3fc3d8f5206f +size 1795 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46eccf92b9a72d0f7f8e2760515ec631b8e58f67 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.md @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). + +#### ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES + +#### I. SCHEDULING + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on Defendant, J. ', Notice for Trial of ' Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein and the court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby \'7 + +f a14/ ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 4, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., (10 days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. + +### II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the 'last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. + +# Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - I. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + - 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; atid + - 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. +- D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL the parties shall confer and: + - 1. discuss settlement; + - 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; + - 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; and + - 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. +- E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It be the duty of counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties arc charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + - I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubert Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. + - 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; + - 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; + - 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 6. a statement of estimated trial time; + - 7. names of attorneys to try case; and + - 8. number of peremptory challenges per party. + +# Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pm-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. +- G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the,expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. +- H. DISCOVERY. Unless otherwise agreed in the Pre-Trial Stipulation, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR CALENDAR CALL absent agreement for later discovery specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or for other good cause shown. +- I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and, prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pretrial conference. +- J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to calendar call, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +- K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +- L. PREMARKING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. + +M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than calendar call, each party shall serve his, her or its objections,to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +### III. MEDIATION + +- O eS A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + - I. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and re resebtatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. + - 2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. + - 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. + - 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it'shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), unless waived. +- B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (f), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall be paid \$175.00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. +- C. Completion of mediation prior to calendar call is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate in mediation, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings may be stricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. +- D. Any party opposing mediation may proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1,700(b). + +# IV. NONCOMPLIANCE + +NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING OF THE CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER SANCTIONS AS ARE JUST. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Floriikkis 3rd day of August, 2018. + +![](_page_4_Picture_4.jpeg) + +### Copies furnished to: + +JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +- **Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.aar) 1,7 James** (brad@epttscorq +- Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com) +- John Scarola Lscarolateamdtgodylaw.com) L ACKERM fre- KARA BERARD BOCK BACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAW.COM) +- Kara Berard R k bach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) KAREN E ERRy (.\_TERRYTEAM©SEARCYLAW.COM) +- Kare Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) +- Maria 'chian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp©law.utah.edu) PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) + +#### Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- F.7 Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmail.com) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COlvI) +- service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrialcom) I70 William Bennett. (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- William B. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) fro Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com) Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com) +- John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com) g David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@searcylaw.com) CO +- James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com) fre Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com) NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com) AR ) +- Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) fr, John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) F7 Jack A Goldberger agoldberger@agwpa.c Pro Andrew A Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.com 5-0 David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com F.% NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@fla pellatt.com) +- **Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw. ) Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) (staff.effle@pathtojustice.com)** +- **Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com)** +- **Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com)** ✓ Kara Berm\ fRocIcenbach (troy@linkrocklaw.com) P David Vitale Jr. (vitaleteam@searcylaw.com) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0286c1bd2570be5635f6d40bef00f8031f1c36e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/EFTA02767632.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,525 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 11509, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 119.60302734375 + ], + [ + 125.46000000000001, + 119.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND \nDIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.312, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 462.2086181640625, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 462.2086181640625, + 348.35302734375 + ], + [ + 138.312, + 348.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. SCHEDULING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 375.35302734375 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 375.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 524.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 288.3009033203125, + 524.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 288.3009033203125, + 539.60302734375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 539.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 95.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 95.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 94.10302734375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 94.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 259.10302734375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 259.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NONCOMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 202.46820068359375, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 202.46820068359375, + 136.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 136.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 173.90780639648438, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 173.90780639648438, + 382.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 382.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures \nCase No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 424.9874267578125, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 424.9874267578125, + 107.070556640625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 107.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767632" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/_page_4_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/_page_4_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef3673af0806f5c4cde8f6bc27f40d0e3c9d2f49 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767632/_page_4_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5eeea39c2db41b9da264fc7d097ba9eadd2c8012367abe6d894aa0ada96adfc7 +size 11698 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c02431e80021b3dbb009bb5eaa2755dab684923 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.md @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. I..M., individually, , individually, and + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +## MOTION FOR CLARIFICATI N OF TRIAL ORDER + +J. by and through ul ersigned counsel, files this Motion for Clarification of the Trial Order as follows' + +On August 3, 2018, this what appears to be the Court's standard Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing retri d Mediation Procedures. The provisions of the standard order are in substantial conflict with numerous prior orders of this Honorable Court imposing limits on the expansion and reopening of discovery. + +As the court has repeatedly recognized in the past, the parties announced ready for trial when this inatterwas set for trial to commence on March 13, 2018. The Court expressly ruled that procedural issues that have delayed the start of trial were not going to be the basis for reopening discovery unless specifically permitted by the Court upon a showing of particular need arising out of some new Court order. + +Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], seeks to clarify that the provisions of the Court's standard pretrial order are not intended to alter the Court's position on this limitation. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 3rd day of AUGUST, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Priority E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +██████████ § ADV. EPSTEIN +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Clarification of Trial Order + +### COUNSEL LIST + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatela +w.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; +rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..defc9329933dee3af6734ac38d42d5a18fe844de --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638/EFTA02767638.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767638.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3717, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.45, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 534.2760000000001, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 534.2760000000001, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR CLARIFICATI N OF TRIAL ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.27999877929688, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 448.2234191894531, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 448.2234191894531, + 356.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 160.27999877929688, + 356.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767638" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7cffbf1dc230da15fc99c292a02ae5f09fe97f94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, L.M., + +J. individually, and Defendant(s). (Cancels hearing previously notice /10) DATE: October 27, 2010 ( S \ 205 N. Dix way, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 SPECIFIC C TO BE HEARD: Defe lion to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Plaintiffs Claim for Damages A b. --t -t. ot --o= 0 E2t-t ' a --lc- ct, rcer " r O + +RE-NOTICE OF HEARIN + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the following: d has called Wilt haring the + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Davi F. + +PLACE: Palm Bea ounty Courthouse (9-C) + +Mo ng counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +adv. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Re-Notice of Hearing + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this ICI da r, 2010. + +: 169440 + +ey Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +m Beach Lakes Boulevard alm Beach, Florida 33409 + +ne: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (5111-9451 + +Attoey rn for J. + +adv. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Re-Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)424-2822 ?si + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-727-2423 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +C.) Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. N One E Broward B , Suit 00 Fort Lauderdal 01 Phone: (954) :4 Fax: (954 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56d9c09e7fa0d87eba76361f610f37bb3978f6b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641/EFTA02767641.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767641.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2203, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.0, + 80.064 + ], + [ + 544.5283813476562, + 80.064 + ], + [ + 544.5283813476562, + 122.60302734375 + ], + [ + 321.0, + 122.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.176, + 529.59 + ], + [ + 292.11, + 529.59 + ], + [ + 292.11, + 546.27 + ], + [ + 82.176, + 546.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.924, + 137.61 + ], + [ + 364.9140625, + 137.61 + ], + [ + 364.9140625, + 152.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 270.924, + 152.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767641" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..951c50bec9ef758a643fce2f639d4b965183098e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.md @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA040800=MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT RouiSTEIN individually, Ma J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counse + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM (Location Change Only) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Tecum of: \* ed attorneys will take the Video Deposition Duces + +## NAME AND ADDRES + +Jeffrey Epsteid(S, + +DATE AND TIME + +August 17, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. or immediately following the video deposition duces tecum of Jeffrey Epstein in the In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. USDC Bankruptcy Court matter scheduled for August 17, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. + +Videographer: Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. + +## LOCATION + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 + +# \*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +## DUCES TECUM\* + +All communications and all records relating to all communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which,a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of= + +upon oral examination before Palm Beach Reporting, Inc., authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Fl for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or f o applicable Statutes or Rules. Public; or any other officer oral examination is being taken r purposes as are permitted under the + +\*"Documents" shall inc C ) but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, p otographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations whom the also inclu h information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of AUGUST, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting (Court Reporter) +Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (Videographer) + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Phil Burlington, Esq. +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] POTTINGER LLC +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] FLBN 54207 +Brittany N. [REDACTED] FLBN 118247 +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(above for address purposes only) +Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvilida que necesita algtin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +/\*: "Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san on pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..434a862e92f2b85c39ab3bb99499c8030f612b4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644/EFTA02767644.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767644.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 6121, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM \n(Location Change Only)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 479.2403869628906, + 341.82 + ], + [ + 479.2403869628906, + 370.85302734375 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 370.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 211.4291229248047, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 211.4291229248047, + 498.35302734375 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 498.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 387.396, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 457.418701171875, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 457.418701171875, + 498.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 387.396, + 498.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF \nTHE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.99000549316406, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 545.904, + 119.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 70.99000549316406, + 119.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 357.408, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 103.68 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767644" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f602cf929927fee21f3b68d4bc30a49804237376 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.md @@ -0,0 +1,955 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FTFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifYCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF YES IN'S RESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATIO TRIAL ORDER AND CROSS MOTION FO 'CATION + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ( tel sponds to the Motion for Clarification of Trial Order filed by Counter-Plaintiff e T. a') on August 3, 2018, and cross moves seeking clarification y 's Trial Order, and states: + +## INTRODUCTION + +lished new pre-trial deadlines in its August 3, 2018, Order Setting Jury Trial ("the Order`') because this is the first trial setting on severed claims and the trial o how t es should be calculated. That is, the Trial Order establishes deadlines based on calendar call, yet does not set forth a calendar call date. Epstein seeks clarification that the deadlines should logically be calculated from the first day of trial (i.e., December 4, 2018) as the Court has done in three trial orders in the past. claims is special set in December 2018. The only "clarification" needed is + +## RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION + +Within an hour of the Court's issuance of the Trial Order, filed his Motion for Clarification, seeking clarification that it was not the Court's intent to reopen discovery. Without conferring, counsel noticed the Motion for a UMC hearing on August 15, 2018.1 While Epstein agrees that the Court may limit discovery, Epstein disagrees that no discove should be conducted, as explained more fully below. Further, while not addressed specifics! e Motion, has also taken the position that the parties should neither excllangF Exhibit and Witness Lists nor file a new Pre-Trial Stipulation. Epstein also disc cse positions. + +## EPSTEIN'S CROSS MOTION FOR CL + +## A. This is the First Trial Setting on Setsic ? + +For the more than eight years this case hasSrn kn ng, and as set forth in the parties' December 22, 2017, Pre-Trial Stipulation, Ep S i c y • against Rothstein and MEI' claim against Epstein were going to be tri ethe On March 1, 2018, just 12 days before the t e asked that the claims be severed. At the March 8, as memorialized in its March 13, 2018, Order, the Court ght certiorari review, but the decision was upheld by the Fourth out prejudice to Epstein's ability to appeal that decision later. scheduled trial date, 2018, hearing on granted that request. Eps District Court of + +&#x27;In the Notice of Hearing, counsel certified that he had spoken in person or by telephone with Epstein's counsel before noticing the matter for hearing, however no such communication ever took place before the Notice was filed. After the fact, Epstein's counsel opposed setting the matter for a UMC hearing on August 15 because another issue is already set &Ar ta and Epstein's counsel did not believe ten minutes is sufficient time to address both issues. counsel refused Epstein's counsel's suggestion to have the matter heard at thair t 22, 2018, hearing. The Court would be well within its authority to refuse to consider Motion for Clarification based on ME counsel's unprofessional failure to confer. + +All of the parties' previously filed pre-trial documents — Exhibit Lists, Witness Lists, Rebuttal Witness Lists, Expert Disclosures, Pre-Trial Stipulation, Deposition Designations, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms — were prepared and are based on the claims proceeding together. The Court properly established new deadlines in the Trial Order to allow the parties to file new pre-trial documents based on the severed claims and new trial date. The Trial Orde , however, established deadlines based on calendar call, yet does not set forth a calendar ca . Epstein seeks clarification that the Court logically intended for the deadlines to be pei based on the trial date, as follows: + +| Deadline | Calculation | Due Date | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------| +| Exhibit Lists; Witness Lists; Expert Witness Lists; Expert Disclosures | 60 days before trial | October 5, 2018 | +| Rebuttal Witness Lists | 50 days before trial | October 15, 2018 | +| Objections to Exhibits; Parties to Meet and Confer to Discuss Settlement and Prepare Pre-Trial Stipulation | 30 days before trial | November 2, 2018 | +| Pre-Trial Stipulation; Deposition Designations | 20 days before trial | November 14, 2018 | +| Discovery Deadline; Counter Deposition Designations; Objections to Deposition Designations | 10 days before trial | November 23, 2018 | +| Mediation | Before trial | December 3, 2018 | + +# B. Limited Discove Id be Allowed + +Epstein i king to "open the flood gates" to conduct extensive discovery. However, in light of e of time and the fact that the trial will now be on claim only, limited dcposi very is needed. + +i. Epstein is Entitled to an Updated Deposition Regarding Damages. + +The Court's October 13, 2017, Order on Epstein's Motion to Strike Mt Discovery Objections and Compel Responses allowed Epstein to take IMM deposition to ask, among other things, questions concerning alleged damages. Exhibit A (10/13/17 Order); Exhibit B (10/3/17 Hearing Tr., 197:20-198:2). Pursuant to those rulings, ' deposition was conducted on November 10, 2017. As to damages, testified: + +Q. What were your damages on December 21', 2009? eS, + +A. It was the same types of damages that I am clai mg C) , in that the complaint that was filed against me w an it was intentionally designed to link me to Scott to ... Since that point in time, those damages ontinued to increase. But they began right fr that this was filed. So whatever damages, w of damage that I was seeking back then, it's mg as now. + +Q. And I asked yo lier the dismissal of that lawsuit stopped the d ou are claiming, and you said, No, it carries all okay to today. ... + +A. It card these thin tit a jury decides otherwise, decides that (gainst me were untrue and hurtful. + +Exhibit C is se (11/10/1 4 44fria Ed Depo. Tr. 201:5-23; 209:6-12; emphasis added). Simply put, • ges through trial. Because trial is now set for a time more than one year after Edw ember 10, 2017, deposition, Epstein seeks a very narrowed, updated deposition limited to o hours, on claims of damages sustained after his November 10, 2017, deposition. Clearly, this is information Epstein needs, and is entitled to. + +### ii. Epstein is Entitled to Take Deposition, Should the Court Allow her to Testify at Trial. + +On April 7, 2011, the interview. While and his counsel conducted a telephone interview of ). Epstein's counsel did not attend, participate in or know about brought tort claims against Epstein, she was not one of three clients. On May 17, 2011, filed an unofficial transcript of 4's April 7, 2011, interview in support of his Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Punif Claim. + +In December 2011, Epstein served a discovery request seekin ' tatements you intend to use in this case" which included "recordings of sound." Ed ids sponded that "none" existed (which was not true) and failed to produce the April audio tape. + +At the November 29, 2017, hearing, the Court \ t r that it would allow to present evidence concerning his three clients' h evidence about the number of other claims tort claims who were not represen 119:3); Exhibit E (12/7/17 Tr. e . t-, , 6:3-14). Epstein interprets this to mean that other tort claimants, including Ms. Robe , ould not be allowed to testify at trial about their specific claims. . . and Jane Doe) claims and general ds' role in litigating those matters of other ds. Exhibit D (11/29/17 Tr. 96:6-14; 118:22 h wever, advised the Court that in fact, would be testifying at E , in's counsel then made an ore tenus motion to be allowed to take . d t i but that request was not granted. Exhibit D (11/29/17 Tr. 169:6-10; 170:12- 171:15). Rjhether the Court currently intends to permit to testify at trial is unclear. + +In light of the Court's rulings, on January 17, 2018, Epstein's counsel asked counsel for a copy of the audio tape. Failing to provide it, on February 15, 2018, Epstein moved to compel and set the motion for hearing. On March 2, 2018, the day before the hearing on the Motion to Compel, produced the audio tape. + +Epstein hired a court reporter to prepare a certified transcript of the audio tape. The court reporter found discrepancies between the unofficial transcript that filed with the Court in May 2011 and the audio tape. These discrepancies bolster Epstein's need to take MM deposition if she will be testifying against him at trial. If the Court is going to allow to testify at trial, then Epstein will be prejudiced if he is not allowed to take her depoltion A in this matter (to question her about issues raised by the audio tape, among other things . mint + +## C. Establishing New Deadlines Moots Pending Motions + +There are twenty-two matters currently set for hearing on Aug t 208. The following Motions, however, can be resolved by allowing the parties to AaV • schedule because new Exhibit and Witness Lists will be new pre-trial deadline + +| | | ) | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| No. | | Matter Se | +| 7 | Motion in Limine Add (New York Post article) | Admissibility of Exhibit No. 132 | +| 8 | Epstein's Motion in Limine on Exclude Deposition Testi Matter | Newly Disclosed Trial Exhibits and to of finesses Who Were not Deposed in this | +| 19 | Epstein's Motion to A | dment to Exhibit List | +| 20 | Epstein's Motion foftea | Disclose Expert Witnesses | + +That is, accordin August 3, 2018 Trial Order, because the Court is allowing the parties to file ne 'bit and Witness Lists, then issues relating to the parties' prior Exhibit and Witness Li teoot. + +# D. rt Re-Established DeatIline,, in the Past + +While this is the first trial setting of severed claims, this Court has established new deadlines almost every time the trial of all claims was set, as follows: + +| Date of Order | First Day of Trial / Docket | Special / Docket | New Deadlines? | Judge | +|---------------|-----------------------------|------------------|------------------------------|-------| +| 4/15/10 | 10/25/10 | Docket | Yes – based on Calendar Call | █ | + +| | | | New Deadlines? | Judge | +|----------|----------|---------|----------------|-------| +| 9/2/10 | 3nn 1 | Docket | No | | +| 4/2/13 | 10/28/13 | Docket | Yes — based on | | +| 11/4/13 | 6/10/14 | Special | Yes — based on | | +| 11/15/13 | 5/6/14 | Special | Yes — based on | | +| 12/3/15 | 8/29/16 | Docket | Yes — based on | | +| 5/20/16 | 10/24/16 | Docket | Yes — based on | | +| 5/24/17 | 12/5/17 | Special | Yes — based on | | +| 11/14/17 | 3/13/18 | Special | No | fele | + +Establishing new deadlines based on a new trial da ards' severed claims is the proper thing to do and will not be prejudiced , Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Gaspar's Passage, L Nv. aceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 243 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); v. Holloway, 933 o. 4 Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.440(c) ("If the court fmds the action ready t o trial, it shall enter an order fixing a date for trial."); 15th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 3. Sept. 29, 2008) (providing that the form attached to the order (except for time de line)iring an exchange of lists of exhibits and witnesses before calendar call "shall nsti the uniform pretrial orders for circuit court civil actions") (emphasis added).2 O + +2 The Circuit's form pretrial order further provides that "[a]t trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown." + +### E. It is an Abuse of the Court's Discretion if it Does Not Consider the New Trial Date in Relation to What Exhibits the Parties May Use at Trial. + +The Trial Order requires the parties to file new Exhibit and Witness Lists. This is the way it should be. Under Binger and its progeny, any limitation on the use of exhibits that does not consider the new trial date (and specifically, the lack of prejudice to =I) would be an abuse of this Court's otherwise broad discretion. + +The principles of and analysis required by Binger apply to trial e as ell as a witness's testimony. "Although a judge has broad discretion in deter evidence due to a party's failure to disclose the evidence within th order, the exclusion of such evidence is a drastic remedy compelling circumstances and only after the judge it h abase-specific determination as to whether admission of the evidence would resul ttaI rocedural prejudice to the objecting party."Med. Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines, 91 2d 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); see also Tomlinson-Ici41' e er to exclude 'red by a pretrial uld pertain in only the most McKenzie v. Prince, 718 So. 2d 394 ( a BQA 1998) (noting that the court's discretion in such an analysis "should be guided ' whether the `objecting party' would be prejudiced by the admission of the evidence.' . objecting party is prejudiced by the admission of evidence that was not timely clos f the party might have taken some action to protect itself had it had timely notice a tness or exhibit, and there exists no other alternative to alleviate the prejudice. xplained in Binger, the Court should also consider the objecting party's ability to cure th rejudice, its independent knowledge of an exhibit, the moving party's possible intentional or bad faith noncompliance with a pretrial order, and possible disruption of the orderly and efficient trial of the case. Id. Importantly, "an objecting party may not, having closed its eyes to the existence of evidence prior to trial, claim that the admission of that evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of the case." Id. + +These principles are highlighted in the recent case of Gaspar's Passage, LLC v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 243 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018). In Gaspar's Passage, the appellate court reversed a \$2.4 million judgment because the trial court had erred by "refusing to permit [the appellant] to add additional witnesses or exhibits after granting [a] continuance of the trial." Id. at 495. Specifically, the trial court had continued a trial to allow the defendant/counter-claimant, RaceTrac, to add additional parties to its complaint. Before the new trial, the couiested the parties were "starting from where [they] stopped," id. at 496, and that Gasp t start adding new exhibits or experts. Three months before the new trial, Gaspar 0 intent to have the court consider its request to designate an expert witness on e damages, and take the deposition of RaceTrac's expert witness. The trial court t s ted that Gaspar was "sort of stuck with what happened with the attorney that 81, h ck at the beginning" and, in large 'S t arcit part, granted a motion to strike filed by Race ? S eeS . , 499. Later, Gaspar moved to amend its exhibit list, seeking to add documents it The trial court also abused its discretion by denying Gaspar's motion to amend its exhibit list in August 2016, several weeks before trial. The intended exhibits became relevant as a result of the amended pleadings, but again, the trial court failed to conduct the required prejudice analysis before denying the motion. + +Ultimately, the trial court agreed with RaceTrac's hearsay and gamesmanship arguments, concluding that Gaspar was not entitled to add additional exhibits "that you've never provided." But a finding that a party engaged in gamesmanship is not the equivalent of a finding that RaceTrac would be prejudiced by the addition of the exhibits.... Further, if, as Gaspar's counsel alleged, some of the exhibits were public record, RaceTrac would have difficulty establishing prejudice. Indeed, the transcript reflects that RaceTrac was aware of at least the property appraiser records—which are public record—because its expert had relied on a report that, Atic incorporated those records.t31 + +Id. at 502-03 (citations and parenthetical explanations omitted). See also 'CZ"(olloway, 933 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (reversing a trial court's exclusion of et ideo evidence of the plaintiff that was disclosed four weeks before trial based ssu associated with a fifth videotape, where there was "no possibility" of prejudi ct t) aintiff, "[t]he videotape the defense sought to introduce in evidence had been ltSco d, and was listed as an exhibit"). + +Gaspar's Passage—and a long line efore it—establish that the trial court's discretion to preclude a party from usin hibi t trial based on "timing" concerns cannot be exercised in a vacuum. In the presen Court's ruling on March 8, 2018, that Epstein would not be permitted to use certain ibi aced on concerns of trial "efficiency" because trial was slated to begin the followi is irrelevant to where the parties stand in relation to the current trial date. To the urpose of Motion for Clarification is to attempt to impose any limitatio ability to use exhibits at trial or call witnesses based on the timeline of this ma cceptance of such an argument would be an abuse of discretion. Because four months remain before trial, the Court's Trial Order properly allows both parties to submit new Exhibit and Witness Lists as attachments to the forthcoming Pre-trial Stipulation. Florida case law, + +3Analogously, some of Epstein's exhibits that takes issue with in the present case are also public records. + +the Rules of Civil Procedure, and even the Local Rules of this Circuit demonstrate that there is no prejudice to from this standard procedure. + +# F. Allowing New Pre-Trial Filines Will Ensure a Fair Trial + +The trial of this case should focus on uncovering the truth related to claim against Epstein, which contends is directly related to the truth of Epstein's ` clams against Rothstein and . not about hiding relevant evidence. Allowing the parties new pretrial documents in accordance with the Trial Order will achieve this goal e re a fair trial. That is, the parties will be able to present evidence that goes to Ce .) cart of allegations. + +should not oppose this request beca usekl,h b)cen the position that he has nothing to hide. For instance, during motions p c ' i rls, o ening the documents gathered in to the Subpoena to the Trustee for ( S t ., e Rosenfeld and Adler, counsel made the following statement: + +> ...as much as we m in the courtroom take a look at take all of this and put it on the floor onor and everybody else in the world to e have nothing to hide, we can't do that. + +(7/13/11 Hearing Tr. 58: hasis added) (Exhibit F). + +Furthermo Edw will not be prejudiced if the parties are allowed to file new Exhibit and Witness The Trial Order gives the parties 60 days' advance notice before trial for the exch ibit and Witness Lists. This is a reasonable amount of time before trial and will not prejudice the parties. In addition, Epstein has already identified and provided with a substantial number of exhibits he may use at trial. Therefore, there will be no "surprise" and it would be an abuse of this Court's discretion not to allow the parties to file new Exhibit and Witness Lists and other pre-trial documents pursuant to the Trial Order's deadlines. + +As Epstein shows in greater detail above, the seminal Florida Supreme Court case of Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981) placed a limitation on trial courts' discretion, however broad, to exclude witnesses and exhibits at trial on timeliness grounds. The Supreme Court in Binger explained that the following factors must always be considered when a party seeks to introduce relevant and admissible evidence at trial: + +> The discretion to [exclude an undisclosed witness] must not exercised blindly, however, and should be guided largely determination as to whether use of the undisclosed with prejudice the opposing party. Prejudice in this sense refe surprise in fact of the objecting party, and it is not d adverse nature of the testimony [or evidence]. Other to which may enter into the trial court's exercise of its di wn (i) the objecting party's ability to cure the prcjudi tmilarly, his independent knowledge of the existen witness [or evidence]; (ii) the calling party's possi nal, or bad faith, noncompliance with the pretrial (iii) the possible disruption and efficient trial of ( other cases). If after considering these factors, and a that are relevant, the trial court concludes that use a disclosed witness will not substantially endanger t irn of the proceeding, the pretrial order mandating disci d be modified and the witness [or evidence] should testify [or be introduced]. + +Binger, 401 So. 2d at 1313. + +A Binger analysis strates that it would be an abuse of this Court's discretion not to allow additional witnesses given the time remaining before trial. Because four months remain befo because the exhibits were provided to in March 2018 (five months ago), o "surprise in fact" to from anything that Epstein is now permitted to disclose in accordance with the Trial Order. Thus, whether even an issue. can "cure" anything is not + +The true reason does not want the Court to establish new deadlines is because he wants to thwart Epstein's efforts for a fair trial. As the Court is aware, Epstein's new counsel + +made efforts to review and identify trial exhibits. Once became aware that Epstein planned to use evidence that is detrimental to his claim, he has taken extreme efforts to keep that evidence out of the jury's view. These tactics should no longer be allowed. Rather, the parties should be allowed to file new pre-trial documents based on severed claims in accordance with the Court's new Trial Order. Epstein recognizes that the Court must still m e rulings concerning the 47 exhibits that claims are privileged. Epstein is not tryi cumvent the Court's prior rulings on those matters and will not be listing them as ' i til the Court orders that he can use those documents at trial. + +Cio.) + +## CONCLUSION + +This Court properly established new pre-trial in n severed claims. \ 4c ) Epstein respectfully requests that the Court uphold t ttse w eadlines, but clarify the Trial Order to establish that the calculations are based on ? c itific fb . Epstein asks the Court to confirm that its Trial Order allows the parties to file E • it Lists, Witness Lists, Expert Witness Lists, Expert Disclosures, Rebuttal W. • , Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms, Objections to Exhibits, Deposition Designat jections to Deposition Designations, Counter Deposition Designations and the Pre- ipulation in accordance with the schedule set forth above. Epstein also asks that di cry b reopened for the limited purpose of taking deposition on damages fro m er 10, 2017 to the present (for no more than two hours) and MM deposi possibility remains that the Court will permit her to testify at trial. + +°Epstein suggests that the parties only file deposition designations for new depositions. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 10, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. ) Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Bamh (Kt Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes ard West Palm Beach 09 me earc law isxOsearcv13w.com dvitaleasetvlaw.com scarolateam(asearcvlaw.com terrvta-m(thsearcvlaw.com Co-Counselor ndant/Counter-Plaintlff a./ + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax ac + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scott®Iin Primary: Karaalin ocklOw.com Secondary: Ti I inkrocklaw.com Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +Jel'lit n Trial r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbtaFLAtmellateLaw.com Co-Counselor iendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN; + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE +[REDACTED] ' DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE [REDACTED] ' DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said motion is DENIED. However, Jeffrey Epstein shall (be permitted to re-depose Bradley [REDACTED] as to the matters identified on the record) by the Court and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] by raise such objections as he considers are appropriate to the specific questions that are asked. The deposition shall take place within the next 30 days. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 13 day of Oct., 2017 numeric pro func October 10, '17. @ + +![]()Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE + FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN + AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + ██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS + +VOLUME II + +DATE TAKEN: Tuesday, October 3rd (2017) + TIME: 10:01 a.m. - 4:43 p.m. + PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C + West Palm Beach, Florida + BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: + +Sonja D. ██████████ + Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. + 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 + West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + (561) 471-2995 + +2 3 4 Let's look at the questions. Let's scroll down a little bit and see if we might be able to find a reasonable median so as to get this moving. + +6 MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: I'm sorry, Your Honor, what you are looking at. + +8 9 10 THE COURT: I'm looking at the C unverified responses that were filed recently. + +11 12 MR. SCAROLA: As to wYidb. ere's no motion pending present Honor. + +13 14 15 16 17 icel \ THE COURT: W l tIwas going to SsI say is, we can th by 8:45 or we can do this now. a recently filed. I understa t e may not be motion pending as far tTiese are concerned. + +18 19 20 21 (32) (23) ?S lt\_would like to get them done, because p going to order that Mr. be + /14 edeposed . (1.) in (1-5114 (to)(15Fdef)(that))die) diaTO Il@ Ciliffarall qi CD it relates )(0 (the)rb—riradi rfotrable (cause (areas ac D0:fdruiTY) ctisut 0 )have) (afrieT))2M) + +24 (25) Offid) fc'El(1-so)(going) (C6) order(traS) tre-wcrfyi(and)ti? (examined) regarding)(the) + +has to be proven as well. + +(dFditialyd-OW -SK)(Li gii-Oyddlli@Ei§nirriddi(4-\$Dg ayE-Mil7Q(Uf) (the),Mdricious)iprosecufidh)(cralliN + +So he would be required to be forthcoming. I thought that we may be able to save a little time if we go through these interrogatories and determine what may be AL) appropriate and what may not be appropr because there may be areas that I bel are far too private and of that nature so that I could save you the tro of having to come back. + +But if there's a cess issue of notice, then I hav blem with waiting for another day + +MR. SC . Your Honor, I am pleased to try t proc ed as far as we can with the unde tanding that I haven't even had an o ort ity to consult with my client about a n otion to compel, because there is no otion to compel. + +But I agree we've got some time available. I would prefer not to waste that time. I would strongly prefer that we can resolve whatever issues need to be resolved, so that if there's further discovery to be + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; +██████████, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +VOLUME I + +VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION + +OF + +(BRADLEY) (EDWARDS) + +Taken on Behalf of Plaintiff + +Friday, November 10th (2017) + +10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. ██████████ + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. +1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 471-2995 + +MR. SCAROLA: So far you haven't asked one that I'm going to let him answer. + +MR. LINK: That's fine. + +BY MR. LINK: + +Q (TAM) were (your) (damages, Oat) (your) (damages on (Decembfl)(2111-D(20091) (were + +0 CEO (types) ED (damages E (claiming =4,1 in (ghat)(Ere) Orin() ITEM)(Era) W, ainst) (E) as e(M)Q.D (r1714 (K) (Teat) (RiSfhstrin7) phTo)(Eticy a to n ) ink (=) (ED (him in (:) wa (Ora) enEl as ED co (an) Q (together (most) (hand) (person) in) (Sou (running)(Wig)(PorTE1) (moment) as (fird) + +CD time e attention (damage of re (E s ein (dTant-h—fg) cause) (most + +onfinued) to (2.ncrease7) (Since)(ern) @Mif) in (dime, (Chose) (damages the began EiMilg ro (rime)(Chat)(Urn) (ni 201 • (So Witratrywn (damages, ('who ever (badk)(th- erip(i£'j (the) (cause) fof (damage (Chat)(I) (seeking) (EhaTetC) (now .) + +Q I got it. So it's the filing of the complaint that caused damages, not it's being + +1 remember a specific conversation like that. + +2 3 Q Well, the lawsuit Mr. Epstein filed against you was dismissed in 2012. + +4 A Three years later. + +5 Q 2012, okay. + +6 --)2i) r Q casked)(you err ter) CEM (en) dismiss + +CO (5f) (that)(1awsu it) ( -topped)(the)(damages)(that)(you) + +CD (le (Arid) (you (said? (N5J(it) carries) (afll4 + +CD on to (tb—da70 (Y-50) remember- )retri WEI) (—) (te? + +(t) Q Ttj (carries) on ot rten) 0 cldes (titherwireT) + +al) • (ttrat)(these) fti ir 'D untrue K 1) + +(n) :% AC (hTifttTIC) + +13 Q What I have b ASN ng you is, you filed a + +14 counterclaim on Dece r th, 10 days after the + +15 lawsuit was file A I am trying + +16 A I t nk t at's 14. 7th to the 21st. + +17 Q the 1 h is when it's filed. The 21st is + +18 when mped. + +19 it is. Okay. + +20 Whether it's the 17th or the 21st -- + +21 4÷ C5 A Okay. + +22 Q One's 10, one's 14th, right? + +23 A Yeah. Very soon after. + +24 25 Q Had you been contacted by the press during that 10-to-14-day window to ask you questions about + +1Y + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Pt i + +## TRANSCRIPT OF E INGS + +DATE TAKEN: W , (November 29th, 2017 + +TIME: .m. - 3:55 a.m. a + +PLACE . Dixie Highway, Room 10C + +t Palm Beach, Florida + +BEFORE: onald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +rQ SA + +This case came on to be heard at the time and place afores when and where the following proceedings were rept) + +Sonja D. + +Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +specifically on this aspect of the case, because one of the things that the defense is attempting to exclude is any reference to anything other than L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases. + +(Your Honor suggested -- and I thought) S (that I heard you correctl -- that evidenc (with regard to other claims actuall (against Epstein would be relevant an material. And clearly it is. + +'respects as well. Tell me think that the aggregate c e knot having anything to do with Mr ards' representation or tein firm's representation -- because Berger, I think, was involved in some + +MR. SCAROLA: Co-counsel. + +THE COURT: Solely as co-counsel -- I believe that to be the case -- are you suggesting that the aggregate cases would be relevant? + +THE COURT: + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +publicize and to sensationalize the circumstances so as to increase the value of at least the claims that were held by the Rothstein firm. + +MR. SCAROLA: Which I think is what every lawyer is supposed to do within the bounds of propriety, obviously. But our j is to maximize the value of our clients filS" 0 claims. + +C.) + +THE COURT: And on the of de of the coin is Mr. t k' position that the impetus -- or us for filing the complaint at ba a exposure of Mr. Epstein, onc to the ignominy of having to fa ublicity of a non-prosecu r 1 agreement where there were admissi where there were agreements ps not admissions -- but agreements limited the prosecution of him as it elates to multiple claimants or multiple potential victims. + +(So again, my ruling on that is if there) (are questions that have to do with this) (issue, globally they will be allowed to be) (asked subject to further argument as it) + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +(relates to the multiplicity of the numerous) (victims that we are dealing with here as) alle ed. + +Same as it goes with this 234-page federal complaint. If there were any questions that were asked of Mr. Epstein where he refused to answer on Fifth AS AP' Amendment grounds, I find that the (: 941 v information would be relevant. Ther for , his failure to answer would be uld be able to be utilized if such ons were asked of him regarding t page federal complaint filed on l ia L.M. by Mr. + +MR. S point, and is, we have been focusing on questio at have already been asked of pstein. Obviously, we have the right all Mr. Epstein as an adverse witness. have the right to put him in that witness chair in front of the jury and to ask him questions that Your Honor has considered to be appropriate that may not have been asked at the time of his deposition. : 1Let me just clarify one + +÷e + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +complaint include the transport of Jane Doe Number 2 on Mr. Epstein's private jets to various homes owned by Mr. Epstein in various locations inside and outside the United States. + +THE COURT: witness? (She's expected to be a) + +CO + +Ac i e sC + +IMR . SCAROLA:) Yes, sir. + +THE COURT: Live witness? + +IMR. SCAROLA : ) Live. + +THE COURT: At this po going to find that, if, in fact, a witness, that it would be cu and hence I am going to sustai jection on those grounds. MR. S : May I just finish my argumen A÷In to why this complaint was of ge in the complaint that she was + +olested onboard the airplane, and that she was prostituted out to third parties onboard the airplane, which provided the basis for Mr. seeking airplane logs and the testimony of pilots and the testimony of others identified in the flight logs as ficance? Because she does -- she does + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +being present on the plane. + +THE COURT: That's fine. I don't have a problem with Mr. testifying. If it becomes an issue in terms of credibility or whatever it might be, then I will take another look at it. But on the basis of the arguments that I have heard, the objection provided. CO is sustained for the reasons that I MR. SCAROLA: Understood. k you, sir. (MS. ROCEENBACH :) ASodor, before we) (leave, based on Your/Honor's ruling, I would) make an ore tenus,mbtion for leave to de ose (Virginia Roberts, because now it has become) (clear that she/is going to be testifyings) (based on Mr. Scarola's statement and Your (lierhbr's rulingj 0 7 \1 (come to court from Australia?) (the lady) THE COURT: Wasn't she scheduled to wasn't that + +MR. SCAROLA:) + +That's where she's + +She was scheduled to come to court. + +(She was available to be deposed previously) + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +(has been listed as a witness for years in) this matter. + +> THE COURT: You'll have to do a written + +motion. But I want to be consistent with + +(what I said recently, and that is that it's) + +not -- the continuance is not -- and I + +(emphasize not -- designee to be a wholesale) + +(reopening of discovery; that the Court tpulci) + +(take that up on an issue-by-issue basis,) + +(but, without pre-deciding anything,'', unless) + +it can be demonstrated to the Court that + +(there was unavailabilitys)hat-there was a) + +(late filing, that there was some type of) + +(inability of a w• ss to testify, something) + +(along those lines.). + +P' These 4't sses have been listed for a lengthy od of time. Again, this was not urpose of the motion that was filed and as not the import of the order of the i?p 4Court. + +Let's talk about number seven. + +MS. ROCKENBACH: Messages taken from message pads found at Mr. Epstein's home. + +THE COURT: What do the messages say? + +MR. SCAROLA: They relate to arranging + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +## TRANSCRIPT OF INGS + +DATE TAKEN: day, (December)O2O)(20177) TIME: 1 1 a.m. - 12:57 p.m. PLACE N. Dixie Highway, Room 11B BEFORE: ( so) Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge est Palm Beach, Florida + +AS + +Ih...) 4eport This cause came on to be heard at the time and place oresaid, when and where the following proceedings were ed by: + +> Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +that were brought by Edward's clients -- E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe -- were relevant. + +So I just wanted, for the record, to be definitive, in that, we are not trying the other claims that may have been represented by other attorneys -- like Mr. Scarola, Mr. Josefsberg -- because they would be only irrelevant, they would be very prejudicial to my client receiving a f it trial. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scar c + +\ t MR. SCAROLA: It ' n y intent to A ASS' get into the merit a of the other claims. + +Howeve e use motive is clearly relevant nd m erial, and because malice is rele nt an material, both with regard to t e pr ary claim and with regard to the ( Sr a u 'tive damages claim, we respectfully uggest that it is error if we were not permitted to talk about what Mr. Epstein's motive was for taking the extraordinary step of filing a baseless claim against + +THE COURT: twea-nprit-ncxggg= + +(obviously,) what may or may not be asked of2Mr. ( [REDACTED] and Mr. Epstein principally on3these cases or these issues,) the global4order of the Court would be that those5individual claims would not be subject to6discussion as to the merits,) as Mr. Scarola7has stipulated.8However, as it relates to both probable9cause,) i.e.,) motive and malice,) the number10of claims ( that is,) speaking in terms of11volume ( that Mr. Epstein was facing at the12time that he brought the suit and continued13the prosecution of that suit would be14relevant. So that's the distinction being15drawn by the Court,) the detail,) the merits,)16whatever may have been discovered as it17relates to those cases would not be18individually admissible in evidence,) or any19of those details from those cases.20However,) as I said,) the sheer number of21cases may be relevant,) i.e.,) to tend to22prove or disprove a material fact as it23relates to probable cause and malice. So24that's the decision.25Next issue, please.MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. May I also ask for this clarification, Your Honor? + +wi1.n3CDOD—Orrrennit7 a)C)(lscMss(CITa) (fS-CD(ELTajt)(tr a -C1)(tra-k-e-ri)(3(1-6--atleTali-i (-f-51-d) (coordiTrain-5) (the) prosecurr5Th(yi)(nri) fo (those) (claims, inaD(that) (rap (that) (ft) was ci t.) C) (:5 -tTi-fire-d)(Ort-5-ft) (---) CtaM art) (of) S FntiT51-0) (rat)? (firms ) Eitt tip. (: ) (15-1-a-Viia)® (ra-a-de-f-a trip (-1751-63 =h i- 3 E en ed @3 C)(5-a-d-i-d) (to)(focus) Upon)(WC) (EU (because)(T) (that)(1-Fa-de-r-atap (I-o-1-6?) + +(THE) (COURT?) ED h s ased on act) (Eh-a) (I) (believe)(3 (=) (youTetTl.: 2a) @3 able ( L3 3.-ft Cf.a 1 u (yes.) + +MR. SC Thank you, sir. + +THE OU Because, again, it tends to prov or disprove p bab cause, elziv ( s a material motive, fact, malice. i.e. , + +Again, whether or not the jury accepts h at -- it's going to be up to the jury to accept it, reject it, give it the weight it deserves, or to infer anything that they reasonably believe would be inferrible as a result of that information. + +o + +The next issue, please. + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, And L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* + +HEARING BEFORE: HONORABLEZle. + +DATE TAKEN: July 1 20 + +TIME: to 4:45 p.m. + +2 Peach County Courthouse Dixie Highway, Room 9C PLACE: est Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +toy REPORTED B : Kathleen M. Ames, RPR + +<4c, + +1 2 attorney-client privilege. Unlike the Fifth Amendment privilege, which is controlled by Mr. Epstein, as much as (we might like to take all of this and put it on the floor) (in this courtroom for Your Honor and everybody else in the) (world to take a look at because we have nothing to hide, we) can't do that. + +7 THE COURT: I understand that. + +8 9 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. So we're oblig our privilege. kA;t,Sert + +10 THE COURT: It's not your p + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 befo MR. SCAROLA: We privilege on behalf of our the clients who we repres but also because that material to ongoi protect the work-p ct obligatio other p ends 0 That's the position that we are in. Now, are obk fl assert the cl eCi " Not only on behalf of Ad \ llIose claims were settled formation is relevant and s against Mr. Epstein, we must privilege, as well, because of the we have to protect the interests of those ever get to questions about privilege and an obligation to prepare a privilege log, and an in camera inspection, the threshold issue is relevance. And it was as a consequence of Your Honor's recognition of the fact that there was a threshold relevance issue that Your Honor stayed enforcement of any subpoena or production request in this Court until such time as the pleadings were clarified \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9be5b205eab35a123998cbc5ca5b85dfd0c4686c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650/EFTA02767650.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1982 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767650.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 41, + "chars": 47356, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF YES IN'S \nRESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION FOR CLARIFICATIO TRIAL ORDER AND \nCROSS MOTION FO 'CATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 355.7803039550781, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 355.7803039550781, + 478.10302734375 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 478.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.252, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 476.621826171875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 476.621826171875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 135.252, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S CROSS MOTION FOR CL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 452.26800000000003, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 452.26800000000003, + 307.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 307.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. This is the First Trial Setting on Setsic ?", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.428, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.428, + 334.8630676269531 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.8630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Limited Discove Id be Allowed", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 303.87506103515625, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 303.87506103515625, + 504.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 504.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Epstein is Entitled to Take Deposition, Should the \nCourt Allow her to Testify at Trial.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6279296875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.6279296875, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Establishing New Deadlines Moots Pending Motions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 378.2961730957031, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 378.2961730957031, + 251.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 251.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. rt Re-Established DeatIline,, in the Past", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 354.851318359375, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 354.851318359375, + 586.1030120849609 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 586.1030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. It is an Abuse of the Court's Discretion if it Does Not Consider the New Trial Date in \nRelation to What Exhibits the Parties May Use at Trial.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.5236206054688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.5236206054688, + 99.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 99.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. Allowing New Pre-Trial Filines Will Ensure a Fair Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 399.2771301269531, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 399.2771301269531, + 142.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 142.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 347.2060241699219, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 347.2060241699219, + 307.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 307.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 415.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE [REDACTED] ' DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.724, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 514.692, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 514.692, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 77.724, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 362.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VOLUME II", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 340.884, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF E INGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.304, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 399.75897216796875, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 399.75897216796875, + 370.963134765625 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 370.963134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT OF INGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.32, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 411.37896728515625, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 411.37896728515625, + 364.5931396484375 + ], + [ + 220.32, + 364.5931396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 142 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 157 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 162 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767650" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09f0a159085d054151c4e36161d331de49d51ffb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.md @@ -0,0 +1,471 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXUMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S O ION TO UNSEAL DISC AND PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBIT R USE AT BANKRUPTCY COURT SHOW CAUSE PIjpCEP GS AND DEPOSITIONS + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("E 'over to imwal the disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" and the 47 documents identt t pstein's March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List that Counter-Plaintiff claims are privileged for the limited purpose of the Bankruptcy CO's w cause proceedings and depositions, and in support thereof, states: + +## INTRODUCTION + +Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, ovants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a Novemb 010 Agreed Order' has not been violated and for sanctions. The subject of those + +&#x27;November 30, 2010, Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing on Motion for Relief from the Amended Order (DE 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epsteirtly,a for the Production of All Documents in Response to His Requests Filed by Interested Party M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR [D.E. 1194]. + +proceedings is a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that had in its files and turned over in February 2018 to Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach. The Bankruptcy Movants claim that retention of the disc is a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order and they seek sanctions against and Epstein for that retention. A show cause hearing is currently scheduled before the Bankruptcy Court on August 23 and 24, 2018, however, has moved to continue it to September 2018. + +The Bankruptcy Court has allowed limited depositions of Epstein entatives of Link & Rockenbach and =. Those depositions are currc y e ugust 17, 20 and 21, 2018, respectively. This Court also allowed the depositiongSi&ste on an additional limited basis, which is set on August 17, 2018. + +Because the disc itself and the 47 exhibits E c i'SS,c ims are privileged have been sealed by this Court, Epstein respectfully moves to u l a Aic documents for the limited purpose of the Bankruptcy Court's show cause proc an e upcoming depositions. + +# ND + +During the March 8, 20 g, the Court instructed Epstein to file under seal Link & Rockenbach's copy of th d exhibits identified on Epstein's March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List whic ar claimed were privileged. The exhibits were filed under seal to protect Epstein's a ts. The scaling was accomplished by the Court's April 6, 2018, Agreed Order Clerk to Seal Filings.2 (Exhibit A.) + +As outlined in Epstein's Notices of Compliance with the Court's March 8, 2018, rulings, (Composite Exhibit B) Link & Rockenbach maintains in a sealed box in its offices: (1) the unredacted Appendix served in support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Second + +&#x27;There was some delay in the sealing because the case was stayed pending appeal.

Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; and (2) a set of the e-mail exhibits Epstein's counsel printed from the disc and identified on Epstein's March 5, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List which claims were late disclosed and/or identified on his 2011 privilege log3. In addition, Link & Rockenbach has maintained in a sealed envelope with original boxes the original disc that was located in files. A

ARGUMENT

The Bankruptcy Court's Show Cause hearing is an evidentiary h e parties are required to submit exhibits to the Bankruptcy Court two days in adva :Dearing. The disc located in records and the 47 exhibits Epstein id ' Bich were obtained from the disc and claims are privileged, are the cen f the hearing. Similarly, the witnesses' testimony will be based on the disc and 8%, x ' i

Epstein asks the Court to allow his co o cal the box and envelope maintained in Link & Rockenbach's offices for use sol ' e Bankruptcy Court ordered depositions when counsel is present. The elope will then be resealed at the conclusion of each deposition. Epstein further is t t he be allowed to provide the Bankruptcy Court two days in advance of the show ng with conies of the disc and 47 exhibits and that his counsel be allowed to un the bo and envelope for the duration of the show cause evidentiary hearing.

CONCLUSION

gly, Epstein seeks permission from the Court to allow his counsel, Link & Rockenbach, to unseal the box and envelope maintained in its offices for use as evidence at the Bankruptcy Court's show cause proceedings and as exhibits at the upcoming depositions as outlined above.

&#x27;The exhibits include both the 47 exhibits claims are privileged and other documents printed from the disc but which were earlier produced in the case.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 13, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax ac

By. Is/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac Primary: It li Primary: Secondary: Secondary: 3%03) m w com cklaw.com inkrocklaw.com

Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boule West Palm Beach, FL 3 law.co law.com Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff dwards

r Plaintiff/Counier-Defendant

Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAopellateLaw.com nisAFLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counseiotiendant/Counter-Plaintiff

J.

J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com Co-Counsel or J.

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(aagwpa.com smahoneya,agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintill7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellnelaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Ceti I for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe C

n 2067547Gs'

Jay H Jay o e e ac i ?s \ 361v11. ell Associates Blvd., Suite 250 le, FL 32211 corn iced Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCO THSTEIN i dividually, J. , individually, and LM; individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

AGREED ORDER DIRECTING C < :104EAL FILINGS

THIS MATTER, coming before the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epsteiti's ("Epstein") Motion to Make C Re Confidential. The Court, pursuant to its ruling at the March 8,2018, hearing, d i ad vised of ihe agreement of the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJU at the Motion is GRANTED.

The followingfido ri, n is provided pursuant to Florida Rule of:Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(3) and 15th dicial. trctiit Administratiye Order 2.303-3/18:

  • (A) Chill. unds.under subdivision (c) for determining the. information confidential: The Court deems the items to be filed under seal confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Adridnistration 2.420(c)(9) because Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff CS) and Intervenors L.M.; E.W., and Jane Doe (Interveners")have asserted a claim of privilege over :the documents.

(C) Whether any party's name is determined to be confidential and, if so, the particular pseudonym or other terms to be substituted for a party name: The Court is sealing the items listed below in their entirety. Should any documents later be unsealed, the documents will be redacted and pseudonyms and initials will be used for Intervenors Jane Doe, E.W. and L.IvLIiit'any other persons the Court deems appropriate.

(D) Whether any progress docket or similar records generated to document activity in the case are determined to be confidential: No.

(E) The particular information that is determin to fidential:

  • o Disc labeled "Epstein
  • The following documen dentified on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List claimed as of which and the Intervenors have

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-102645
13-20303754
13-30303655
13-40014935
13-5015273
13-604493-04495
13-70001436
13-803998-040006
13-902231
13-1001300
13-110009037
13-1202906-02908
13-130013368
13-1411237
13-150800631
13-170002670
Ex. No. 13-18No. 01464App. No.
13-190100471
13-2001403
13-2102684-0268551
13-2201475
13-240369479
13-251228933
13-260116638
13-270125872
13-2815113-15114
13-3026481
13-3126394
13-3325922
13-3C26480 •60
13-3526356,
13-3626570
13-3700992
13.40014237
13-4105071
13-43,0204381
"13-44. z03731-03732
.13-45 .06406-06408
13-460i686 -.48
'.13-4711123-1112550
13-4802088
13-4911126-1112732
13-5011128-1113149
13-5108459
.13-5225925
.13-53.25874
13-5408348-08349
13-5508355
13-5611145
13-6003191-031924
13-612728487
13-622689389
13-6401255
13-6526836-2683790, 91
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-6604398-044022, 34
13-6704408-044121
13-682680792
13-6926808-2680993
13-702737994
13-712729395
13-722602163
13-732727096
13-742735597
13-7527325100
13-7727322101
13-7826777-26781
13-7926782-26786102, 103, 104
13-8026088-26089105
13-812599852
13-8327072108
13-85Legamaro
Depo Ex 6
13-862674711
13-8808042-0804416
13-8926741-2674213, 15
13-9008059-0806117
13-9227522109
13-9326756-267589
13-9408036-0803819
13-96Legamaro
Production
13-97267628
13-980111721
13-9927051-20752112
13-10008121-0812320
13-10126749-2675223
13-10208128-0813024
13-10308118-0812022
13-10408131-0813325
13-10508124-0812626
13-10608135-0813810
13-1072749427
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-10826760
13-10927025111
13-1102599728
13-1112593767
13-1122697384
13-11326604-2660556
13-1142673757
13-1152648557
13-11607019-07021
13-1172701358

(F) Identification of persons who are permit the confidential information: Unless and until ordered by this Court, only this o and the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall be able to view the items under seal.

(G) The Court finds that (i) , duration, and manner of confidentiality ordered by the Court are no broader tha n to protect the interests set forth in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2. 20(c); (ii) no less restrictive measures are available to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c).

(H) TheCleik of Court is directed to publish the order in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(4).

The items identified above shall remain under seal until further order of this Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach n , Florida this 6 . day of April, 2018.

THE HO DO LD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT COUR. JUDGE

SERVICE LIST

Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 menribsearcvlaw.com isx@searcylaw.comPhilip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 444 West Railroad Avenu West Palm Beach, FL 334 pmbraFLAneellateLaw.cotp
nisra)FLAppellateLaw.com dvitalera,searcvlaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terrvteamcasearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff J.i kbtaFLAnpellateLaw.com Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Edwards
West Palm Beach= FL 33401
'Marc J. Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@epllc.com Co-Counseltindant/Counter U Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400S. Nurik .Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp ieoldbereereaewpa.com smahonevliDavna.com Co-Counsel/et. Ilathtiff/Colinter-Defendant Jeffrey Epsteinlaw.utalledu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. IV and Jane Doe

Scott J. Link

Kara Berard Rockenbach

Rachel J. Glasser

Link & Rockenbach, PA

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Scottelinkrocklaw.com

Kara©Iinkrocklaw.corn

Rachelelinkrocklaw.com

TinaMinkrocklaw.com

Trov@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Jeffey Epstein

Jay Howell

Jay Howell & Associates

644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250

Jacksonville, FL 32211

javhowell.com

Limited Intervenor Co-Coun LM.,

and Jane Doe

ti

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

CO SA

SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS , CRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je '....." Epstein ("Epstein") hereby serves the transcripts (morning and afternoon sessions Compliance with the Court's lifted. arch 8, 2018, hearing, and provides his Notice of pstein will file this Notice with the Court once the stay is

THE COURT'S RULINGS

At th g, the Court made the following rulings:

  • s to Intervenors' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the pleadings relating to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a proposed Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.)
  • The sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.)

I Although no written Order has been entered and the proceeding is stayed, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record.

  • In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2-63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Sessjon, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.)

On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District ourt ppeal entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review.

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep u co el, Link & Rockenbach, PA, have complied with the Court's rulings at the Mal 2018, hearing as follows:

  • Link & Rockenbach, made any further dissemination of the documents included in the Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Seco Admissible Evi nal exhibits or other documents from the disc that ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Siii ea has asse privi claims over.
  • On March 8018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its co-counsel (Jack rger), its litigation team working on this matter, and its expert, Timothy to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents ned from the disc and any copies of the discs that they had in their possession. ÷ • n March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul YY Caccell on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
    • J. Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated.
    • Link & Rockenbach, PA is assisting counsel to seal the redacted version of D.E. 1242, Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to ' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for

Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED].

    +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and has deleted the electronic version from its system.
    • +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA, has placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes.
    • +
  • • In [REDACTED] March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log, Edwards alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged:
    • +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.[REDACTED] No.App. No.
113-102645
213-40014935
313-5015273
413-604493-4495
513-70001436
613-110009037
713-130013368
813-150800631
913-170002670
1013-190100471
1113-251228933
1213-3026481
1313-342648060
1413-3526356
1513-3626570
1613-4403731-03732
1713-4506406-06408
1813-460168648
1913-4711123-1112550
2013-4911126-1112732
2113-5225925
2213-5325874
2313-5611145
2413-6003191-031924
2513-6604398-044022, 34
2613-6704408-044121
2713-8626747711
2813-8808042-0804416
2913-8926741-2674213, 15
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
3013-9008059-0806117
3113-9326756-267589
3213-9408036-0803819
3313-97267628
3413-980111721
3513-10008121-0812320
3613-10126749-2675223
3713-10208128-0813024
3813-10308118-0812022
3913-10408131-0813325
4013-10508124-0812626
4113-10608135-0813810
4213-1072749427
4313-10826760
4413-1102599728
4513-1112593767
4613-11326604-2660556
4713-11607019-07021
    +
  • • [REDACTED] also objected to the following additional exhibits as being late disclosed:
    • +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
113-20303754
213-30303655
313-803998-040006
413-902231
513-1001300
613-122906-2908
713-1411237
813-1801464
913-2001403
1013-2102684-0268551
1113-2201475
1213-240369479
1313-260116638
1413-270125872
1513-2815113-15114
1613-3126394
1713-3325922
1813-3700992
1913-40014237
2013-4105071
2113-430204381
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
2213-4802088
2313-5011128-1113149
2413-5108459
2513-5408348-08349
2613-5508355
2713-612728487
2813-622689389
2913-6401255
3013-6526836-2683790,91
3113-682680792
3213-6926808-26809
93 AN
3313-702737994
3413-7127293
3513-722602163
3613-7327270
3713-742735597
3813-7527325100
3913-7727322101
4013-78267
4113-792 6 6102, 103, 104
4213-808 6089105
4313-812552
4413-072108
45Legamaro
46A- 927522109
47 146/)3-96Legamaro
413-9927051-20752112
4913-10927025111
5013-1122697384
113-1142673757
) 5213-1152648557
5313-1172701358

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has marked the exhibits identified above and placed them in a sealed envelope for filing with the Court under seal once the stay is lifted in order to preserve Epstein's appellate record. Link & Rockenbach, PA will retain a set of these exhibits in a sealed envelope in the sealed box maintained in its offices for appellate purposes.
  • With the exception of those documents it is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that has identified as privileged.

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which will be filed under seal with the Court once the stay is lifted.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with its original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the further rulings by the Court. oxes until
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate e disrc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from i r system and Dropbox.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA will work with its IT pens move copies of any documents has claimed as privileged e-mail servers.

ERTIFI ATE F

I certify that the foregoing document has Service List below on March 11, 2018, via e-m is lifted. shed to the attorneys listed on the ill e served with the Court once the stay

+6s

INX & ROCKENBACH, PA 55 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

By: /s/ Scou J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachelelinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

+
+

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

+

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

PlaintiWCounter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

UPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI AND ScHteC STREIJILNI'NSGSI

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

/

In H COURT'S 1(EP Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey (L "Epstein') hereby updates his March 8, 2018, Notice of Compliance with thef arch 8, 2018, rulings and states:

Q SA

r URT'S RULINGS

At that hearing, the Cou e the following rulings:

  • As t IntellPerrirs' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the ply rigs re sting to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.) ÷ sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be tied under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.)
    • In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly

Although no written Order has been entered yet on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record.

disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2- 63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.)

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi g e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.)

On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District Co Agica I entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review. That stay uiic :In part, on March 20, 2018, and Epstein hereby updates his Notice of Compliant A

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE

0 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey EpsteV. ittii , Link & Rockenbach, PA, has complied with the Court's rulings at the Marc \, 1 caring as follows:

  • Link & Rockenbach, has 7tot made any further dissemination of the documents included • pendix in Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to E and Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Sco of Adm. t le dente, the newly disclosed trial exhibits in which claims pri i ege, or other documents from the disc that has asserted p •vilege ms over.
  • Neit er Eps n nor his general counsel (Darren Indyke), were ever provided with a co of the disc nor did they review or have access to the disc or the disc's Epstein and his general counsel also never received the disc or alleged leged" documents from the firm or any other former counsel. ÷ec er, Epstein and his general counsel were provided with select e-mails by Link Rockenbach, PA that were included in the Appendix or identified as trial exhibits. Immediately after the hearing on March 8, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its client's general counsel (who was at the hearing), its cocounsel (Jack Goldberger, who was at the hearing), and its litigation team working on this matter to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents obtained from the disc.
    • Timothy Chinaris, a former Ethics Director of the Florida Bar who provided an expert affidavit in this action, was also not provided with a copy of the disc but, rather, received a binder (in paper form) containing the unredacted Appendix.

Mr. Chinaris was instructed to destroy the binder along with any electronic copies he may have had. Mr. Chinaris confirmed his compliance with this request.

  • Neither the disc nor any of its contents were ever provided to the Gunster firm or any of its attorneys nor were the contents of the disc ever discussed with them.

A Goes

    +
  • • On March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul Cassell, on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated.
    • +

Mr. Cassell's request was addressed, and granted by stipulation, at the March 8, 2018, hearing. Both Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel, however, failed to provide the Court with a proposed order at the hearing, which would have resulted in the immediate sealing of two docket entries that had not yet been opened to the public. While Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel had ample time during the hearing to have an Order prepared and signed by the Court, a proposed order was not circulated to Epstein's counsel until the following afternoon, Friday, March 9, 2018. Judge Hafele had made known to the parties that he would not be in Court on March 9, 2018, because of the Bench Bar Conference, but he advised where he could be found, if needed. Nevertheless, the Fourth DCA's stay was entered on March 9, 2018, within hours of the transmittal of the proposed order. Furthermore, on the evening of March 9, 2018, the Clerk opened the two docket entries that are at issue to the public.

During the weekend of March 10 and 11, 2018, Epstein's counsel worked tirelessly with [REDACTED] counsel to obtain emergency relief from the duty judge to seal the two docket entries at issue. The duty judge, however, deferred the matter to Judge Hafele. Accordingly, on the morning of March 12, 2018, Epstein's and [REDACTED] counsel went before the Court at 8:30 a.m. and obtained an Order, nunc pro tunc, sealing the two docket entries at issue:

    +
  1. 1. Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (D.E. 1242, a 353-page filing with attachments containing actual emails as well as a summary of its contents); and
    2. +
  2. 2. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED] (D.E. 1252).
    3. +

The Clerk then sealed the two docket entries which had been open to the public for more than 48 hours.

    +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and deleted the electronic filed version from its system.
    • +

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes.
  • In March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on I= Privilege Log, alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged:

No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
113-102645
213-40014935 A
313-5015273
413-604493-4495
513-7000146
613-1100090
713-130013368
813-150800631
913-170002670
1013-19010071
1113-251233
1213-308
1313-346460
1413-35a,
164,-a03731-03732570
175 c06406-06408
181 6
0168648
19-4711123-1112550
20/1 613-4911126-1112732
2113-5225925
(4;;,,3213-5325874
13-5611145
!) 2413-6003191-031924
2513-6604398-044022,34
2613-6704408-044121
2713-8626747711
2813-8808042-0804416
2913-8926741-2674213, 15
3013-9008059-0806117
3113-9326756-267589
3213-9408036-0803819
3313-97267628
3413-980111721
3513-10008121-0812320
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
3613-10126749-2675223
3713-10208128-0813024
3813-10308118-0812022
3913-10408131-0813325
4013-10508124-0812626
4113-10608135-0813810
4213-1072749427
4313-10826760
4413-1102599728
4513-1112593767
4613-11326604-2660556
4713-11607019-07021

also objected to the following additional e L' ' which were printed from the disc as being late disclosed:

No.Ex. No.ltpp. No.
113-203034 454
213-30355
313-80006
413-922
513-14q.,2 00
613-906-2908
711237
\* 1
101464
91 -01403
10-2102684-0268551
111 ,„,,,„13-2201475
1213-240369479
( 1313-260116638
)13-270125872
1513-2815113-15114
1613-3126394
1713-3325922
1813-3700992
1913-40014237
2013-4105071
2113-430204381
2213-4802088
2313-5011128-1113149
2413-5108459
2513-5408348-08349
2613-5508355
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
2713-612728487
2813-622689389
2913-6401255
3013-6526836-2683790,91
3113-682680792
3213-6926808-2680993
3313-702737994
3413-712729395
3513-722602163
3613-732727096
3713-742735597 A
3813-7527325100
3913-7727322
4013-7826777-26781
452
4113-7926782-26786
26088-2608949
4213-80
4313-81
4 413-83
4513-85
4613-92109
4713-96g o
4813-7051-20752112
49111
e 9ISLI17025
126973
51GI 42673757
52-1152648557
SI'S.,13-1172701358

A

obj cted to other documents Epstein identified as newly disclosed trial ibi. .ut those were obtained from public sources over which and assell cannot assert privilege claims and, therefore, they are not included as of this Notice of Compliance.

Link & Rockenbach, PA placed an exhibit sticker on the 100 newly disclosed exhibits identified above to correspond with Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. Two sets of those exhibits were made. One has been retained by Link & Rockenbach, PA in a sealed envelope in a sealed box maintained at its offices for appellate purposes. The other set was initially retained in a sealed envelope at Link & Rockenbach, PA, however, on March 21, 2018, in light of the lifting of the Fourth District Court of Appeal's stay, in part, those exhibits were filed under seal. Epstein has also moved the Court to Make the Court Records Confidential in compliance with the 1511 Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09

and set that Motion for hearing on April 9, 2018.

  • • With the exception of the trial exhibits and appendix items identified above which Link & Rockenbach, PA is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that [REDACTED] has identified as privileged.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which it retained at its offices until the stay was lifted. In that regard, on March 21, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA filed the disc under seal and moved the Court to make the court records confidential in compliance with the 15th Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. That Motion is set for hearing on April 9, 2018.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed [REDACTED] original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with [REDACTED] original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the [REDACTED] boxes until further rulings by the Court.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate of the disc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from its computer system and Dropbox, the online service by which those documents were transmitted to counsel of record.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA began deleting electronic documents from its system and planned to work with IT personnel to remove copies of any documents [REDACTED] has claimed as privileged from its e-mail servers. In light of [REDACTED] objection to the deletion of electronic documents, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA has not taken further steps to delete electronic documents. The Court made no rulings on the preservation of these documents and Link & Rockenbach, PA does not agree that the review [REDACTED] demanded is appropriate. Until the Court rules otherwise, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA will not delete any further electronic documents and will work with its IT personnel to preserve those documents.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 23, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [f

By: /s/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rocken c 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (F 57 251) Primary: Scot ' kr aw.com Primary: Kara a li ocklaw.com Primary: ache dlinkrocklaw.com Seco idana.linkrocklaw.com S roy®IinlcrocIdaw.com

Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Sca la, lbart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beac es Boulevard West Palm B F 3409 dvital rcylaw.com scarolatea scarcylaw.com terrvteamasearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter-Plaintiff J.

unsel for Plaintifj7Counter-Defendant Epstein

T

Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLApnellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counseltiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

J. [REDACTED]
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+

NOTA CERTIFICATE

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c63b3c5b907b8f01d86560fe40830be79234d88 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691/EFTA02767691.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1699 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767691.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 31, + "chars": 57671, + "elapsed_seconds": 19.12, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S O ION TO UNSEAL \nDISC AND PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBIT R USE AT \nBANKRUPTCY COURT SHOW CAUSE PIjpCEP GS AND DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 515.8464965820312, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 515.8464965820312, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 518.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 518.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.7714538574219, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.7714538574219, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 344.60589599609375, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 344.60589599609375, + 224.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 224.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 349.4327697753906, + 555.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 555.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 539.9340209960938, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 539.9340209960938, + 126.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 126.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER DIRECTING C < :104EAL FILINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.02800000000002, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 465.7505798339844, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 465.7505798339844, + 361.60247802734375 + ], + [ + 134.02800000000002, + 361.60247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 346.5440368652344, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 346.5440368652344, + 154.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 154.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS\n, CRIPTS \nAND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 390.3630676269531 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 390.3630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 351.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 351.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED].", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFI ATE F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 338.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 338.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 683.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 683.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI \nAND ScHteC STREIJILNI'NSGSI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 492.04800000000006, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 492.04800000000006, + 376.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 376.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "r \nURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 430.6875 + ], + [ + 379.340087890625, + 430.6875 + ], + [ + 379.340087890625, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 336.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 336.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 431.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 431.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767691" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8013dd0d8d6d8d94a8c81098edecabe9885a290 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +33401: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plainti iNNpstein, ,45 will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before the Ho ,,c zblec ...., nald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 No • • ighway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida C.) + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifflCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +#### iltV'Sg1"C RE-NOTICE OF Ur G + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +MOTION: De Co la • Scott Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended + +DAT • "s eptember 12, 2018 + +TI 8:45 a.m. (UMC) + +## LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION + +Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good-faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +X Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. Movant's counsel also communicated by e-mail to attempt to resolve this matter. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the minion are self represented. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnis Service List below on August 13, 2018, through the Court's of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). attorneys listed on the rtal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +LINK, ACH, PA 155 S 8i ch Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 each, Florida 33401 ) -4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +/s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvglida que necesita algun acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enlim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Entim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Ilighway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb1c7327dd83b4d33ed8911ca96e9953f77493e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722/EFTA02767722.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767722.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10617, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "iltV'Sg1\"C\nRE-NOTICE OF Ur G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 399.19195556640625, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 399.19195556640625, + 362.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 212.97599999999997, + 362.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCAL RULE 4 CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 402.76348876953125, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767722" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6b86ef8090887175d0bb16e8eba8496f9d96127 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.md @@ -0,0 +1,1572 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFIWY STEIN'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN guyircirr OF HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE WEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS. ETC. + +As supplemental authority in suppo Non-Privileged Nature of Documen ...., wit Determine Relevance, Inappli 1 Jr Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to cal Documents, Plaintifi7Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), respectfully the Opinion in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th 014), attached to this Notice as Exhibit A, and clients' Appellee Brief fd attached to this Notice as Exhibit B. In Jane Doe No. I, the United States Court o s for the Eleventh Circuit held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the workproduct privilege with respect to documents sought by MEt clients, after having voluntarily sent allegedly privileged correspondence to the United States during plea negotiations. &don for Court to Declare Relevance and Specific Request for In Camera Review to + +There, clients claimed that the United States failed to confer with them before entering into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. As part of that lawsuit, clients + +sought to discover correspondence between Epstein's former counsel and the United States regarding the non-prosecution agreement. *Id.* at 1001. The federal district court overruled Epstein's former counsel's privilege objections. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the work-product privilege as to all persons, as a consequence of having sent the allegedly privileged correspondence to the United States: + +The intervenors [Epstein's former counsel] next contend that the correspondence falls under the work-product privilege, but the finding of the district court that the intervenors waived any privilege when they voluntarily sent the correspondence to the United States during the plea negotiations is not clearly erroneous. Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversary waives the work-product privilege. *See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig.*, 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); *In re Doe*, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). **Even if it shared the common goal of reaching a quick settlement, the United States was undoubtedly adverse to Epstein during its investigation of him for federal offenses, and the intervenors' disclosure of their work product waived any claim of privilege.** + +*Id.* at 1008 (emphasis added). **Exhibit A.** + +In reaching its conclusion, the Eleventh Circuit agreed with the position of [REDACTED] clients, espoused by [REDACTED], as set forth in their Appellee Brief. In their Appellee Brief, [REDACTED] clients, through Edwards, made the following argument: + +Case law is clear that "[d]isclosure to an adversary waives the work product protection as to items actually disclosed, even where disclosure occurs in settlement." *In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litigation*, 860 F.2d 844, 860 (8th Cir. 1988). In summarily rejecting Epstein's claim, the District Court found that Epstein had waived any work product protection in the materials by turning them over to the federal prosecutors: + +Assuming without deciding that any part of the correspondence in question reflects "the mental impressions, conclusions, or legal theories" of Epstein's attorneys, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3), any work product protection which might otherwise attach to this product was necessarily forfeited when Epstein voluntarily submitted the information to the United States Attorney's Office in the hopes of receiving the quid pro quo of lenient punishment for any + +wrongdoings exposes in the process. Work product protection is provided only against “adversaries.” Thus, disclosure of the material to an adversary, real or potential, works a forfeiture of work product protection. In this case, Epstein’s attorneys’ disclosure to the United States Attorney’s Office was plainly a disclosure to a potential adversary. The United States Attorneys’ office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein’s sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and deliberating the filing of relevant federal charges; while Epstein’s counsel clearly hoped to avoid any actual litigation between the United States and Epstein, the potential for such litigation was plainly there. By voluntarily and deliberately disclosing this material to federal prosecutorial authorities investigating allegations against Epstein at that time, any work product protection was necessarily lost. + +DE 188 at 6 (citing, inter alia, *United States v. ██████████* sachusetts Institute of Technology, 129 F.3d 681 (1st Cir. 1997)). Numerous cases have reached the same conclusion as the District Court in similar circumstances.[\*] + +**Exhibit B, at 35-36.** + +██████████ supported this last statement with the following authorities: + +*See, e.g., Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Republic of the Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1429 (3d Cir. 1991)* (Westinghouse’s disclosure of work product materials to the Justice Department during an investigation “waived the work-product doctrine as against all other adversaries.”); *In re Quest Communications, Inc.*, 450 F.3d 1179, 1192-1201 (10th Cir. 2006) (company’s disclosure of documents to the SEC during criminal investigation waived work product protections); ██████████ *United Methodist Church v. City of Cheyenne*, 451 F.3d 643, 668 (10th Cir. 2005) (“any work product protection was waived by [party] via production” of the documents in question); *In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation*, 293 F.3d 289, 302 (6th Cir. 2002) (attorney client/work product privilege was “never designed to protect conversations between a client and the Government—i.e., an adverse party—rather, it pertains only to conversations between the client and his or her attorney. . . . purpose of [attorney-client privilege] is to encourage full and ██████████ communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice. Nowhere amongst these reasons [for protection] is the ability to ‘talk candidly with the Government.’”); *In re Chrysler Motors Overnight Evaluation Litigation*, 860 F.2d 844, 846-47 (8th Cir. 1988) (defendant company’s disclosure of computer tape to class counsel during settlement negotiated waived work product when tape sought by government as part of criminal + +case); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 824-25 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (production of documents during settlement discussions with the SEC waived work product protection as to grand jury materials). + +Exhibit B, at 36 n.13. + +Epstein also files as Exhibit C the August 4, 2010, hearing transcript in In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RBR. The following are statements made by William Scherer, Raw counsel: + +- "[fin November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alle as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's emp maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired Epstein/LM litigation in order to lure \$13.5 million ort of my victims, my clients, into making investments i p ney [sic] settlements." (17:7-14.) +- "In addition, as we have alleged, that sensational allegations in the LM in order to entice my clients into the airplane with Mr. Epstein 19:7.) and the fum put ew were not true, g that Bill Clinton was on oung woman ..." (18:24- +- "I can't conceive tha ds and the predecessor law firm would have any s cpare privilege logs or anything else, given what I jusV4ttd urt. That would be like having the fox guard the hen h ( 0:5-9.) +- "[The Co It ju,Shname names Rothstein. It does not name Mr. othstein, not the firm, and lays out the facts and says otl people "in the firm. We did not name them because we want to cuments and see whether they had involvement." (22:3- +• support the same position that [Epstein] has asked the Court, and that is to have the trustee deal with this, get these documents and deal with it with you, rather than allow the successor law firm to have them. (22:16-24.) + +8/4/10 Hearing Transcript, Exhibit C. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax mk , + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kam Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: tt lin Primary: Kara w com Secondary: Ti a a li klaw.com Secondary: Y4inkrocklaw.com + +T JeJack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +2078181 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +KeyC te Ye ow Fag Negat ve Treatment D st ngu shed by Drummond Co., Inc. v. Terrance P. Co nwnvorth, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, th C r.(F a.), March 5,20 6 + +749 F.3d 999 + +United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit + +Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe + +No. 2, Plaintiffs—Appellees, + +v. + +UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. + +Roy Black, G. Weinberg, Jeffrey + +Epstein, Intervenors—Appellants. + +No. 13-12923. + +April 18, 2014. + +#### Synopsis + +Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crimes brought action against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) related to the United States Attorney Office's execution of non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetra After the victims moved for disclosure of correspo concerning the non-prosecution agreement, th perpetrator and his criminal defense attome to assert privilege to prevent the di of heir plea negotiations. The United States tut for the Southern District of Florida Co 9:08 CV 80736 KAM, ordered disclosurgshe intervenors filed interlocutory appeal. + +Holdings: The Co held that: ( S e ppeals, Pryor, Circuit Judge, + +[1] Court of A appeal; s had jurisdiction over interlocutory + +[2] plea negotiations were not protected from disclosure by federal rule of evidence barring admission of plea negotiations; + +[3] intervenors waived work-product privilege; and + +[4] plea negotiations were not protected from disclosure by any common-law privilege. + +Affirmed. + +West Headnotes (15) + +#### [1] Federal Courts + +Ca. Jurisdiction + +The court of appeals reviews d ovo whether it has jurisdiction to decid nterlocutory appeal. + +3 Cases that cite tIC1Zjte + +Cie E n e Cow() + +#### [2] Federal + +Th of appeals reviews de novo tation of the Federal Rules of + +ASSCases that cite this headnote + +### Federal Courts + +0.• Witnesses + +The issue of whether to recognize a privilege is a mixed question of law and fact that is reviewed de novo. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 501, 28 U.S.C.A. + +2 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 141 Federal Courts + +0- "Clearly erroneous" standard of review in general + +The court of appeals reviews for clear error factual findings made by a district court. + +Cases that cite this headnote + +#### [5] Federal Courts + +Preliminary proceedings:depositions and discovery + +Court of Appeals had jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from District Court's discovery order requiring disclosure of plea negotiations between United States Attorney Office (USAO) and criminal defense attorneys who represented alleged perpetrator of federal sex crimes against alleged minor victims, in alleged victims' Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) action against United States, in connection with USAO's execution of non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetrator, appeal was filed by alleged perpetrator and defense attorneys, who were intervenors for limited purpose and could not challenge final judgment in victims' action against United States, the victims' action was ancillary to criminal investigation, and absent an interlocutory appeal, alleged perpetrator and attorneys would be left with no recourse to appeal the disclosure order. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3771. + +I Cases that cite this headnote + +### (61 Federal Courts + +0- What constitutes final judgment + +A final decision, for purpose of appellate jurisdiction, is one by which a district court disassociates itself from the case, and ends the litigation on the merits and leaves not more for the court to do but ex judgment. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. + +1 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 171 Federal Courts + +t— Preliminary p discovery 4- 1.1;7positions and + +Discovery orders t ordinarily not final ediately appealable. + +ite this headnote + +### [8( Federal Courts + +0- Preliminary proceedings;depositions and discovery + +The Perlman doctrine allows an intervenor to file an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. + +### 191 Federal Courts + +4>. Preliminary proceedings;depositions and discovery + +Under Perlman, a discovery order directed at a disinterested third party is treated as an immediately appealable final order because the third party presumably lacks a sufficient stake in the proceeding to risk contempt by refusing compliance. + +I Cases that cite this headno e + +110( Federal Courts Sten] Orders + +rine" provides an eral bar of interlocutory 1) conclusively determines question; (2) resolves an ssue completely separate from is of the action; and (3) is ely unreviewable on appeal from a al judgment. + +Cases that cite this headnote + +#### MI Criminal Law + +0- Civil liabilities to persons injured; reparation + +Correspondence documenting plea negotiations between the United States Attorney Office (USAO) and criminal defense attorneys for alleged perpetrator of federal sex crimes against minor victims were not protected from disclosure, in alleged victims' Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) action challenging the USAO's execution of non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetrator, by federal rule of evidence barring admission of plea negotiations; the alleged victims intended to admit the evidence of the plea negotiations to prove violations of the CVRA by the United States, not to be used against the alleged perpetrator. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 410, 28 U.S.C.A. + +1 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 1121 Federal Civil Procedure + +4)... Waiver + +Alleged perpetrator of federal sex crimes against minor children and his criminal defense attorneys waived any work-product privilege in correspondence documenting plea negotiations with the United States Attorney Office (USAO), in alleged victims' Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) action challenging the USAO's execution of non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetrator, where the attorneys voluntarily sent the correspondence to the United States during plea negotiations. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3771. + +2 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 1131 Federal Civil Procedure + +0- Waiver + +Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversary waives the work-product privilege. + +1 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 1141 Privileged Communications and Confidentiality + +op-. Criminal records + +Correspondence documen negotiations between the Attorney Office (USAO) defense attorneys for al federal sex crimes agai were not protectril from disclosure by any com vilege, in alleged victims' C 1e tims' Rights Act (CVRA) action challenging the USAO's execution of -prosecution agreement with alleged perpctra . 18 U.S.C.A. § 3771; Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 501,28 U.S.C.A. ea ates an criminal rpetrator of minor victims + +There is a presumption against common-law privileges which may only be overcome when it would achieve a public good transcending the normally predominant principle of utilizing all rational means for ascertaining truth. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 501,28 U.S.C.A. + +I Cases that cite this headnote + +#### Attorneys and Law Firms + +9001 Paul Cassell, Univers] tah College of Law, Salt Lake City, UT, Bra Jaffe Weissing Edwa istos & Lehman, PL, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jay J. Howell & Associates, Jacksonville, FL, for s Appellees. + +G. Weinberg, PC, Boston, ucline L. Perezek, Black Srebnick pf, PA, Miami, FL, Jay P. Leflcowitz, is, LLP, New York, NY, for Intervenors + +ifredo A. Ferrer, Dexter Lee, Kathleen Mary Salyer, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, Ann C. AS sae, Villafana, U.S. Attorney's Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant. + +1 Cases that cite this headnote + +#### 1151 Privileged Communications and Confidentiality + +Privileged Communications and Confidentiality + +Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 9:08 cur 80736 KAM. + +Before PRYOR and Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL, • District Judge. + +#### Opinion + +PRYOR, Circuit Judge: + +This appeal requires us to decide two issues: whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal by criminal defense attorneys and their client who intervened in a proceeding ancillary to a criminal investigation to claim a privilege that would prevent the disclosure of their plea negotiations; and, if so, whether a privilege bars crime victims from discovering plea negotiations. The United States investigated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, but failed to confer with the victims before entering a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. Two victims filed suit against the United States to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and sought to discover the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the United States regarding the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein and his attorneys then intervened to object to that discovery as privileged. The district court overruled their objection and ordered the United States to disclose the correspondence to the victims. After the intervenors filed this appeal, the victims \*1002 moved to dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. Because we conclude that we have jurisdiction to decide this appeal and that the plea negotiations are not privileged from discovery, we affirm. + +## I. BACKGROUND + +In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused several minor girls. The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida accepted Epstein's case for prosecution, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation issued victim notification letters to two minors, Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, in June and August 2007. Extensive plea negotiations ensued betty the United States and Epstein. On September 24, 2 United States entered into a non-prosecution a with Epstein in which the United States ag any federal charges against Epstein in e e f his offer to plead guilty to the Florida off es of itation of prostitution and procurement of mi engage in prostitution. Fla. Stat. §§ 796.07, 03. + +Not only did the Unit ates nkglect to confer with the victims before it to into the agreement with Epstein, it also fail to of them of its existence for at least nine months. The U ted States sent post-agreement letters to the\_victinis reporting that the "case is currently under investi et.'on" , and explaining that Tiflis can be a lengthy process (rid we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation." And in June 2008, the United States asked the victims to explain why federal charges should be brought against Epstein without mentioning the agreement to them. + +On June 27, 2008, the United States informed the victims that Epstein planned to plead guilty to the Florida charges three days later, on June 30, 2008. But the United States failed to disclose that Epstein's pleas to those state charges arose from his federal non-prosecution agreement and that the pleas would bar a federal prosecution. The victims did not attend the state court proceedings. + +On July 7, 2008, Jane Doe No. I filed a petition alleging that she was a victim of federal crimes committed by Esptein involving sex trafficking of children by fraud and enticing a minor to commit prostitution and that the United States had wrongfully excluded her from plea negotiations and violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3771. She alleged that violated her right to confer with fe right to be treated with fairness, notice of relevant court p receive information about answered that it used the rights afforded the Act did not apply potential fed the initia e United States rosecutors, her 've timely gs, and her right to The United States orts" to comply with under the Act, but that ndictment negotiations with ndants. After Jane Doc No. 2 joined the district court found that both as "crime victims" under the Act. 18 . Among other relief, the victims sought the non-prosecution agreement. + +ctims' petition remained dormant for years while they pursued a federal civil suit against Epstein and reached a settlement agreement with him. As a basis for relief against Epstein in the civil suit, the victims relied on Epstein's waiver of his right to contest liability in the non-prosecution agreement. Over Epstein's objection, the district court in that civil suit ordered the United States to produce the documents given to Epstein's attorneys during his plea negotiations. The victims received correspondence written by the \*1003 United States, but they never received any correspondence written by Epstein's attorneys during the plea negotiations with the United States. + +In 2011, the victims renewed the prosecution of their petition against the United States. The victims moved to use correspondence between the United States and Esptein's attorneys during the plea negotiations to prove violations of their rights under the Act. And the victims later moved the district court to compel the United States to produce all requested discovery about the plea negotiations. + +Epstein and his criminal defense attorneys, Roy Black and Weinberg, moved to intervene for the limited + +purpose of challenging the disclosure and use of the correspondence they wrote during plea negotiations. After the district court granted their permissive intervention, Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b), the intervenors moved for protective orders. The intervenors argued that the work-product privilege protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure II create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jury material. They also urged the district court to recognize a common-law privilege for plea negotiations. The United States responded that the court should consider the correspondence privileged, but that it would disclose the correspondence if the court ordered it to do so. + +Epstein later filed two other motions to intervene in a limited capacity one to challenge the disclosure of grand jury materials and another to challenge any remedy that would violate constitutional and contractual rights under the non-prosecution agreement. The attorney-intervenors did not join either of these motions. The district court has not yet ruled on Epstein's motion to intervene to prevent disclosure of grand jury materials, but the district court has "allowed [him] to intervene with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement." + +The district court then issued two discovery both of which the intervenors challenge in In the first, the district court denied t ors' motions for protective orders and g ictims the right to proffer the corresponde ween the United States and Epstein's at eys, but the district court reserved "ruling on the rel r admissibility" of any of the correspo cc t rove violations of the Act. In the seco d, a district court required the United States a ers to all outstanding requests for a nd to produce documents in response to for production by the victims, including "a ocumentary material exchanged by or between the ederal government and persons or entities outside the federal government (including without limitation all correspondence generated by or between the federal government and Epstein's attorneys)." After the intervenors filed this interlocutory appeal, the victims moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This Court later entered a stay of the second order, which required the United States to disclose the correspondence to the victims. + +#### II. STANDARDS OF REVIEW + +III 121 131 141 Two standards of review govern issues in this appeal. We review de now whether we have jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal before addressing the merits. United States v. 413 F.3d 1295, 1299 (11th Cir.2005). We also review de novo the interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See United States v. Campo, 459 F.3d 1121, 1174 (11th Cir.2006); Pickett v. Iowa Beef Process 1279 (11th Cir.2000). And the issu recognize a privilege under Fide is a mixed question of law an • a Adkins v. Christie, 488 F But we review for cl a district court. Mo Med Ctr., 506 F s, 209 F.3d 1276, ether \*1004 to vidence 501 at we review de novo. 27 (11th Cir.2007). ual findings made by v. Mobile Infirmary 19 (11th Cir.2007). the + +### M. DISCUSSION + +our discussion in two parts. First, we explain have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal united intervenors who, as claimants of a privilege, hallenge a disclosure order directed at the United States, a disinterested party. Second, we explain that the plea negotiations are not privileged from disclosure. + +#### A. We Have Jurisdiction To Decide This Interlocutory Appeal. + +(51 The victims argue that we should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction for two reasons. First, they argue that the Perlman doctrine, which permits a claimant of a privilege to appeal a non-final judgment, applies only to grand jury subpoenas. Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7, 38 S.Ct. 417, 62 L.Ed. 950 (1918). Second, they argue that a decision of the Supreme Court, Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter. 558 U.S. 100, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009), forecloses an interlocutory appeal of a denial of a claim of privilege. + +161 171 The courts of appeals "have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States, ... except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court." 28 U.S.C. § 1291. A "final decision" is one "by which a district court disassociates + +itself from the case," Mohawk, 558 U.S. at 106, 130 S.O. at 604 05 (alteration omitted) (quoting Swint v. Cnty. Commn, 514 U.S. 35, 42, 115 S.Ct. 1203, 1208, 131 L.Ed.2d 60 (1995)), and "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing more for the court to do but execute the judgment," Carpenter v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 541 F.3d 1048, 1052 (11th Cir.2008) (quoting McMahon v. Presidential Airways, Inc., 502 F.3d 1331, 1338 (I I th Cir.2007)), afjd, 558 U .S. 100, 130 S.O. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009). Discovery orders are ordinarily not final orders that are immediately appealable. hi Five notable exceptions to this rule exist: the Perlman doctrine; the collateral-order doctrine, v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,69 S.O. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); a certification provided by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b); a petition for a writ of mandamus; or an appeal of a contempt citation. + +RI (SI The Perlman doctrine allows an intervenor to file an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 832 F.2d 554, 556 58 (11th Cir.1987). "'This exception, derived from Perlman v. United States, ... permits an order denying a motion to quash to be 'considered final as to the injured third party who otherwise powerless to prevent the revelation.' " 558 (quoting In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Fs F.2d 199, 202 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981)). Under discovery order directed at a disinterest treated as an immediately appealable use the third party presumably lacks a su t ake in the proceeding to risk contempt bjefusing compliance." Church of Scientology of Cal v. States, 506 U.S. 9, 18 n.11, 113 S.Ct. 44 52 n. I, 121 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992); see also In re it ash at Belle Harbor, N.Y. on Nov. 12, 2001, 4 , 106 (2d Cir.2007) ("[T]he Perlman except n ant only to appeals brought twos by t ho e a privilege where the disputed subpoena is d t at someone else.").We have exercised jurisdiction un the Perlman doctrine when the party ordered to disclose the information "has no direct and personal interest in the suppression of the information" and would be reluctant to risk a contempt citation, such that "the order is definitely final as to the [claimant of the privilege]." Fine, 641 F.2d at 201 02. We have not invoked the Perlman doctrine to exercise jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal outside the context of a grand jury proceeding. See, e.g., In re Fed Grand Jury Proceedings (=.). 975 F.2d 1488, 1491 92 (11th Cir.1992); In + +re Grand Jury Proceedings, 832 F.2d at 558; Fine, 641 F.2d at 201 02. But we have exercised jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals by claimants of a privilege in some civil proceedings. See Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465 66 (11th Cir.1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to materials that another party has been directed to produce"); Int'l Horizons, Inc. v. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Intl Horizons. Inc.), 689 F.2d 996, 1001 02 (Ilth Cir.1982) (holding that an order compelling production of allegedly p leged material is immediately appealable because "t ilege-holder has no power to compel the custodi crial to risk a contempt citation for his re to comply" (internal quotation marks omitted) . U.S. Fid ct Guar. Co.. 224 F.2d 158, 16 h Cir.1955) (exercising interlocutory jurisdi citing Perlman in a civil action to recover r breach of a bond against a surety comp re "denial of the privilege could [not] be revi either from the final judgment or from rder"). argue that we should not extend Perlman d an intervenor's appeal of a grand jury subpoena, e decline to draw an arbitrary line. The victims' rgument has an ipse dixit quality that is, because our Court has never before applied the Perlman doctrine outside of the grand jury context, we should not do so now. But we must ask instead whether applying the doctrine here makes sense. The logic of the Perlman doctrine applies with equal force in this appeal. Like a claimant objecting to a grand jury subpoena cannot challenge an indictment to remedy the disclosure of his privileged information, the intervenors cannot challenge a final judgment in this proceeding to remedy the disclosure of their plea negotiations. And the victims' petition, like a grand jury proceeding, is ancillary to a criminal investigation. The rights and remedies provided by the Act arise in a criminal prosecution and affect how the United States prosecutes that action. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), (d). The victims argue that Epstein has made himself an ordinary litigant through his intervention, but we disagree. The district court has allowed Epstein's attorneys to intervene only to contest the disclosure of their correspondence, and the district court has granted Epstein limited intervention to challenge only the disclosure + +or his attorneys' correspondence and any remedy that involves the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein's only opportunity to challenge the disclosure order is now because there will not be an adverse judgment against him or his attorneys. The district court instead will enter any judgment against either the victims or the United States. And, even if the victims succeed in their petition to rescind the non-prosecution agreement, Epstein can challenge only that remedy, not the judgment against the United States. The victims intend to use the correspondence \*1006 from Epstein's attorneys to prove that the United States violated the Act, which is an issue separate from the kind of relief necessary to remedy that violation. And it is all the more likely that the district court would fashion a remedy that does not involve the non-prosecution agreement, if the district court were to conclude that rescission is unavailable, which might then bar an appeal by Epstein of that remedy. + +The intervenors claim a privilege, and only claimants of a privilege may appeal under the Perlman doctrine. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 832 F.2d at 558 59. Contrary to the victims' argument, jurisdiction under the Perlman doctrine does not rise or fall with the merits of an appellant's underlying claim for relief. See, e.g., id at 55 60 (permitting an interlocutory appeal based on Perin but holding that "we fmd that the privilege appellants is without a basis in Florida la appellants "have no privilege of nondisclo law"); v. City of Memphis, 423 F Cir.2005) ("[Perlman] jurisdiction does validity of the appellant's under see also, e.g., Perlman, 247 U.S. a (reviewing Perlman's clai n int finding no violation of by the United Stat litigation). The 'n Rule 410, Amendment well as a new co (6th d on the claims for relief."); 38 S.Ct. at 420 tory appeal, but h Amendment in later use ibRs made public in previous claim a privilege based on oduct privilege, and the Sixth to effective assistance of counsel as on-law privilege for plea negotiations. These claims of privilege, however tenuous, are sufficient to establish jurisdiction under Perlman. + +Absent an interlocutory appeal, the intervenors would be left with no recourse to appeal the disclosure order. The intervenors cannot defy the disclosure order and risk a contempt citation because the order is directed at the United States, which has expressed an intent to comply with the order. The United States is a disinterested party because it does not purport to hold the privilege claimed by the intervenors. Even if the United States earlier shared the common goal of resolving the criminal investigation quickly and without a federal indictment, any interest of the United States in asserting a privilege for plea negotiations dissipated when Epstein disclosed the correspondence written by the United States to the victims in the civil suit. + +The intervenors are also likely unable to pursue their claims through the remaining "estab ed mechanisms for [immediate) appellate review." ohawk, 558 U.S. at 112, 130 S.Ct. at 608. Seca a im's petition under the Act arises in a c action, the text of section 1292(b), which ap vil action," renders a certification of this enable. See also In re Grand Jury Proceed .2d at 557 (holding that grand jury proceedin of civil actions for purposes of section 12 nd if the intervenors were to seek a writ of is unlikely that the disclosure order would t t a "judicial usurpation of power or a ci iscretion" or "otherwise work') a manifest ohawk, 558 U.S. at 111, 130 S.Ct. at 607 quotation marks omitted). + +101 The victims argue that, even if the logic of the Perlman doctrine applies here, the decision of the Supreme Court in Mohawk forecloses this interlocutory appeal, but they misconstrue both the decision in Mohawk and the Perlman doctrine. Mohawk considered whether the Court had jurisdiction under the collateral-order doctrine, which provides an exception to the general bar of interlocutory appeals if an order "(1) conclusively determines the disputed question; (2) resolves an important \*1007 issue completely separate from the merits of the action; and (3) is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment." id at 105, 130 S.Ct. at 604. In Mohawk, the Supreme Court foreclosed an interlocutory appeal of an order requiring the disclosure of materials protected by the attorney-client privilege because the claimant was a party who could appeal a final judgment. Id at 114, 130 S.Ct. at 609. The Supreme Court explained that an appeal from a final judgment suffices "to protect the rights of litigants and ensure the vitality of the attorneyclient privilege" because "[a]ppellate courts can remedy the improper disclosure of privileged material in the same way they remedy a host of other erroneous evidentiary rulings: by vacating an adverse judgment and remanding fora new trial in which the protected material and its fruits + +are excluded from evidence." Id at 109, 130 S.Ct. at 606 07. The Court found unpersuasive that these disclosures may "have implications beyond the case at hand" and ruled that, although imperfect, postjudgment review is sufficient. Id at 108 12, 130 S.Ct. at 606 09. The Court also explained that three traditional routes of immediate review could still afford the claimant of the privilege adequate relief in a civil action: the claimant could ask the district court to certify the appeal of "a controlling question of law," the resolution of which "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation"; the claimant could petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus; or the claimant could defy a disclosure order and appeal a sanction for contempt. Id at 110 II, 130 S.Ct. at 607 08 (internal quotation marks omitted). The Supreme Court in Mohawk never cited Perlman nor discussed appeals by claimants of a privilege who are limited intervenors in a proceeding ancillary to a criminal investigation and seek to prevent the disclosure of information held by a disinterested party. See In re Grand Jury, 705 F.3d 133, 146 (3d Cir.2012) ("[T]he Mohawk Court ... did not discuss, mention, or even cite Perlman...."). Understandably so claimants of a privilege under the Perlman doctrine remain "powerless to avert the mischief of (a discovery) order," Perlman, U.S. at 12 13, 38 S.Ct. at 419, because the materials question are held by a disinterested party who "to forgo suffering a contempt citation and favor of disclosure," United States v. Kran 573 (9th Cir.2010). As the Seventh Cir explai about the scope of the Perlman doctrine after oh k, "ropily when the person who asserts a \*vilege is a nonlitigant will an appeal from a final decision equate." Wilson v. =, 621 F.3d 641 3 (7th 'r.2010); see also In re Grand Jury, 705 F. 46 & n.11 (rejecting that Mohawk narrowed n t least in the grand jury context"); Holt r d e ity of Dickson, 641 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir i I I A izing that Perlman jurisdiction remains when nonparty asserts a privilege); Krane, 625 F.3d at 572 (nth g that "Perlman and Mohawk are not in tension" when the claimant of a privilege is not a party). But see United States v. Copar Pumice Co., Inc., 714 F.3d 1197, 1207 09 (10th Cir.2013) (holding that jurisdiction under the Perlman doctrine is limited to only the grand jury context, but declining jurisdiction because the privilege holder was also a party to the litigation). And, as we explained above, the intervenors cannot appeal a final judgment against the United States, which leaves + +them without an avcnuc to appeal the denial of their claims of privilege. + +#### B. The Intervenors' Correspondence Is Not Privileged. + +1111 The intervenors argue that the district court erred when it ordered the \*1008 disclosure of the plea negotiations because three privileges protect the correspondence: a privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 410, the work-product pn ge of attorneys, and a common-law privilege for negotiations in criminal proceedings. We disc o p lege prevents the disclosure of the plea n + +)C' + +#### I. Federal Rt11e of Uvidence 410 Provides No\_PiSJegelor Plea Negotiations. + +dcncc 410 does not protect against y of plea negotiations and, even if it early falls outside its protection because a guilty plea and the victims intend to use pondence against the United States, not against ein. Rule 410 "create(s], in effect, a privilege of he defendant," United States v. Mezzanatio, 513 U.S. 196, 205, 115 S.Ct. 797, 803, 130 L.Ed.2d 697 (1995) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted), but not a privilege of non-disclosure as the intervenors assert. The text of Rule 410 unambiguously states that the evidence "is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea discussions" if the "guilty plea ... was later withdrawn" or "did not result in a guilty plea." Fed.R.Evid. 410(a). Rule 410 governs the admissibility of plea negotiations, not the discoverability of them. Moreover, Epstein cannot invoke Rule 410 because he pleaded guilty to state charges based on the same conduct and has not withdrawn those pleas. See, e.g., United States v. 794 F.2d 345, 349 (8th Cir.1986) (admitting guilty plea from state court in federal proceeding). The victims intend to admit the correspondence to prove violations of the Act allegedly committed by the United States, not "against" Epstein. And even if rescission of the non-prosecution agreement abuts Epstein's interests, the purpose of the admission does not change. Rule 410 does not bar disclosure of the correspondence written by the attorney-intervenors. + +### 2. The Intervenors Waived Any Work-Product Privilege. + +1121 1131 The intervenors next contend that the correspondence falls under the work-product privilege, but the finding of the district court that the intervenors waived any privilege when they voluntarily sent the correspondence to the United States during the plea negotiations is not clearly erroneous. Disclosure of workproduct materials to an adversary waives the workproduct privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir.1988); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081 82 (4th Cir.1981). Even if it shared the common goal of reaching a quick settlement, the United States was undoubtedly adverse to Epstein during its investigation of him for federal offenses, and the intervenors' disclosure of their work product waived any claim of privilege. + +As a last-ditch effort, the intervenors contend that "(ijf more is needed in addition to the plain language of Rule 410 to preclude disclosure of the correspondence to plaintiffs, it can be found in the conjunction of Rule 410, the work-product privilege, and the Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel in the p bargaining process," but this novel argument fa As explained above, Rule 410 does not create a and the intervenors waived any work-prod The intervenors concede too that the • nsel under the Sixth Amendment had not t art lttd when the correspondence was exchanged. Se ey v. City of Dade City, Fla, 327 F.3d II 195 (11th Cir.2003) ("[T]he Sixth Amendment right to 1 ordinarily does not arise until there is s al 1009 commitment by the government top e," such as a "formal charge, preliminary hea ail) g, i dictment, information, or arraignment."). The "co unctive" power of three false claims of psjyjlpge does not rescue the correspondence from disci + +#### 3. We Decline To Recognize a Common-Law Privilege for Plea Negotiations. + +1141 1151 The intervenors also invite us to recognize a common-law privilege for plea negotiations, Fed.R.Evid. 501, but we decline to do so. The intervenors have not established a "compelling justification" to prevent the discovery of plea negotiations in criminal proceedings. In + +re MN Horizons, 689 F.2d at 1004. Although Congress empowered the federal courts through Rule 501 to "continue the evolutionary development of testimonial privileges," Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40,47, 100 5.0. 906, 910, 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980), we disfavor newly minted privileges, which "contravene the fundamental principle that the public has a right to every man's evidence," Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir.2007) (quoting Univ. of Pa. v. EEOC, 493 U.S. 182, 189, 110 S.Ct. 577, 582, 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990)). "Accordingly, there is a presumption gainst privileges which may only be overcome w would achieve a 'public good transcending th rma predominant principle of utilizing all ratio ns for ascertaining truth.' " Id (quoting Tra .S. at 50, 100 S.Ct. at 912). + +The Supreme Court flkjQefitified several considerations relevant to a court should recognize an evidentia the needs of the public, whether the privile s in the imperative for confidence and tiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, nsus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 1, 10 15, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 1928 31, 135 L.Ed.2d 996) but none of these considerations weighs in avor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent discovery of the plea negotiations. Although plea negotiations are vital to the functioning of the criminal justice system, a prosecutor and target of a criminal investigation do not enjoy a relationship of confidence and trust when they negotiate. Their adversarial relationship, unlike the confidential relationship of a doctor and patient or attorney and client, warrants no privilege beyond the terms of Rule 410. See Jaffee, 518 U.S. at 10, 116 S.Ct. at 1928. But the victims would enjoy an evidentiary benefit from the disclosure of plea negotiations to prove whether the United States violated their rights under the Act. As for any consensus among the states, the majority of the state statutes the intervenors cite adopted Rule 410 verbatim. Compare, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 90.410 ("Evidence of a plea of guilty, later withdrawn; a plea of nolo contendere; or an offer to plead guilty or nolo contendere to the crime charged or any other crime is inadmissible in any civil or criminal proceeding."), with Fed.R.Evid. 410. + +Even if we were to accept the intervenors' argument that plea negotiations are de facto confidential in criminal practice, that custom alone would not protect them from discovery because Rule 410 militates against the establishment of a new privilege. The Supreme Court has cautioned federal courts to be "especially reluctant to recognize a privilege in an area where it appears that Congress has considered the relevant competing concerns but has not provided the privilege itself." Univ. of Pa., 493 U.S. at 189, 110 S.Ct. at 582. Congress weighed the evidentiary concerns related to criminal plea negotiations when it enacted Rule 410, which enables a defendant to negotiate without fear that the prosecutor will use his statements against him. Rule 410 contemplates that \*1010 plea negotiations should ordinarily be inadmissible against a defendant, but not always. The rule does not bar the admission of plea negotiations, for example, when the defendant pleads guilty, in a proceeding for perjury, or when the defendant introduces the statements so long as they are not selfserving hearsay. If we were to recognize a privilege for plea negotiations, we would upset the balance that Congress + +#### Footnotes + +Honorable Charlene designation. Honeywell, United States Dialn 814c < 4 for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by + +End of Document + +struck when it adopted Rule 410. See In re MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337, 1344 (Fed.Cir.2012) (rejecting a privilege for settlement negotiations because Congress, by enacting Rule 408, "did not take the additional step of protecting settlement negotiations from discovery."). We will not go further than Congress stated was necessary to promote the public good in criminal plea negotiations. + +#### IV. CONCLUSION + +We AFFIRM the disclosure order [FT the stay of the order compelling the Unit jczyates disclose the correspondence. + +#### AU Citations + +cee 749 F.3d 999, c . L. kly Fed. C 1270 + +O + +S 2017 iv mson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Wolics. + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +No. 13-12923 + +# In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Eleventh Circuit Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, A''.--N + +ciit s ,-Appellees, + +C) + +v. + +United States of Ameri + +Roy Black 141 s, + +Defendant, + +Intervenors/Appellants. + +## JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO.2'S APPELLEE BRIEF + +## Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida + +KJ. Edw Paul G. Cassell AFF NG, I l'ill'' 425 North venue, Suite 2 332 South, 1400 East, Room 101 Fort La orida 33301 Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0300 Telephon 9 524-2820 Telephone (801) 585-5202 Facsimile ( ) 524-2822 Facsimile (801) 581-6897 E-mail: bmd@pathtojustice.com E-mail: cassellp(glaw.utah.edu + +Si. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW & EHRMAN, P.L. AT THE UNIV. OF UTAH + +Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellees Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No. 2 + +## CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS + +Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, through undersigned counsel, hereby certifies that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case: + +- 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth ,Cialik' +- 2. Acosta, R. Alexander +- 3. Black, Roy C +- 4. Cassell, Paul G. +- 5. J. +- 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. ActS +- 6. Epstein, Jeffrey N --- +- 8. Howell, Jay +- 9. Lee, Dexter +- 10. Lefkowiklyr ir +- 11. Perc cZe +- 12. rt. Bruce +- 13. Eduardo I. +- 14. Sloman, Jeffrey +- 15. Villafafia, A. +- 16. Weinberg, + +Q + +iS C) ) + +17. Doe No. 1, Jane + +18. Doe No. 2, Jane + +Note: As they have in the court below, as well as in parallel civil court proceedings, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 proceed by way of pseudonym as victims of child sexual assault. + +i + +## STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT + +Appellees Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 request oral argument in this case to clarify the factual record. + +A Cos + +## TABLE OF CONTENTS + +## Contents + +| TABLE OF CONTENTS..... | iv | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..... | vi | +| STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION..... | 1 | +| STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND STATEMENT OF FACTS ..... | 1 | +| standard of review ..... | 10 | +| SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ..... | 12 | +| Argument..... | 13 | +| I. EPSTEIN HAS FAILED TO DEVELOP AN EVIDENTIARY RECORD IN THE DISTRICT COURT THAT HE HAS ANY INTEREST IN THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE..... | 15 | +| II. THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN IS NOT PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY BY FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 410 OR BY THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE..... | 19 | +| A. RULE 410 DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE BECAUSE THE PLEA DISCUSSIONS LEAD TO A GUILTY PLEA..... | 19 | +| B. THE DISTRICT COURT'S FACTUAL FINDING THAT SIGNIFICANT PARTS OF THE CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNED SUBJECTS OTHER THAN PLEA NEGOTIATIONS IS NOT CLEARLY ERRONEOUS. .... | 25 | + +- C. RULE 410 DOES NOT APPLY HERE BECAUSE THE VICTIMS CAN USE THE CORRESPONDENCE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT. 29 +- D. RULE 410 DOES NOT BAR DISCOVERY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE 31 +- E. THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE DOES NOT APPLY TO CORRESPONDENCE WITH AN ADVERSARY. 35 +- III. THE DISTRICT COURT PROPERLY CONCL THAT CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN IS NOT PROThCTED FROM DISCOVERY BY SOME KIND O MMON LAW" PLEA BARGAINING PRIVIL 39 + - A. THE COURTS CANNOT C "COMMON LAW" PRIVILEGE TH ES THE LIMITATIONS OF AND THE STATUTORY CO OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIG 39 + - B. NO "CO PRIVILEGE FOR PLEA BARG II G I STS. 41 +- IV. THIS CO OES NOT POSSESS JURISDICTION OVER AN OCUTORY DISCOVERY DISPUTED. 46 CONCLUS 49 + +## TABLE OF AUTHORITIES + +## CASES + +| Bogle v. McClure, 332 F.3d 1347, 1358 (11th Cir. 2003) | 13, 18, 19 | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| (M.D.N.C. 1989) | 25 | +| Cir. 2001) | 33 | +| Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litigation, 860 | 844, | +| 846 (8th Cir. 1988) | 42, 43 | +| Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation, 2' | 289, | +| 302 (6th Cir. 2002) | 43 | +| Cox v. Administrator U.S. Steel & Carnie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1 | 2 Cir. 1994) 45 | +| Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426 (5th Cir.1981)). | 47 | +| El-Ad Residences at Mirarmar Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. | awley Ins. Co., 716 F | +| Supp. 2d 1257, 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2010)) | 21 | +| Folb v. Motion Picture Ind. Pension & Health | .Supp.2d 1164, 1175 | +| (C.D. Cal. 1998) | 53 | +| Frontier Ref., Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co., | .3d 695, 704 (10th Cir. 1998) | +| United Methodist Church v. | heyenne, 451 F.3d 643, 668 (10th Cir. | +| 2005) | 43 | +| Grand Jury Proceedings, No. | F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir. 2013) 30 | +| v. Avis Rent A Cgt S | Inc., 916 F.Supp. 256, 259 (W.D.N.Y.,1996) | +| International Horizon | Inc. v. The Committee of Unsecured Creditors, 689 F.2d | +| 996, 1004 (11th Cir. | 12, 47, | +| John Doe, 662 d 10Y3, 1080 (4th Cir. 1981) | | +| Kenna, 435 1, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006) | | +| Lampley Ci a | Dade City, 327 F.3d 1186, 1195 (11th Cir. 2003) 49 | +| Miccos | e of Indians of Florida v. United States, 516 F.3d 1235, | +| 12 Cir. 2008) | 12, 17 | +| Mohawk dustries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009) | 14 | +| MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337 (7th Cir. 2012) | 11, 37, 53 | +| Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S.C.t 1473, 1485 (2010). | 49 | +| Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 824-25 (D.C. Cir. 1982) | 43 | + +| 740 754 C. Cir. 2006) | 21 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| v. Lighting, Inc., 506 F.3d 1361, 1364 (11th Cir.2007) | 34 | +| United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005) | 23, 35 | +| United States v. Biaggi, 909 F.2d 662, 691 (2d Cir. 1990) | 35 | +| United States v. Chapman, 954 F.2d 1352, 1360 (7th Cir. 1992) | 28 | +| United States v. Edehnann, 458 FI.3d 791, 804-06 (8th Cir. 2006) | 29 | +| United States v. Hare 49 F.3d 447, 450 (8th Cir. 1995) | 30 | +| United States v. 794 F.2d 345, 349 (8th Cir.1986) | 28 | +| United States v. Kerik, 531 F.Supp.2d 610, 618 (S.D.N.Y. 2008 | 25, 28 | +| United States v. Krane, 625 F.3d 568 (9th Cir. 2010) | 54 | +| United States v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 12 | (1st Cir. | +| 1997) | 43 | +| United States v. Merrill, 685 F.3d 1002 (11th Cir. 20 | 29, 32 | +| United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) | 47 | +| United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5 | 0) 24 | +| United States v. Ruhkowsi, 814 F.2d 594, 59 | ir. 1987) 24, 38 | +| University of Pennsylvania v. E.E.O.C., 4 | 82, 189 (1990) 47 | +| Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, | 49 | +| Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Repu li | f t e Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1429 | +| (3d Cir. 1991) | 43 | +| World Holdings, LLC v. Fede a blic of Germany, 701 F.3d 641, 649 (11th | | +| Cir. 2012). | 11 | + +## STATUTES + +## OTHER ACOIITIES + +| 150 C N . S4261 (Apr. 22, 2004) | 15 | +|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Crime | ctims' Rights Act, Pub. L. 108-405, Title I, § 102(a), 118 Stat. 2261 | +| (2004), | 15 | +| 41 (2012) | 51 | + +C.) + +## RULES + +| Fed. R. Civ. Evid. 408..... | 11, 37, 53 | +|--------------------------------|------------| +| Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3),..... | 42 | + +| Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) | 9 | +|------------------------|--------| +| Fed. R. Evid. 410 | passim | +| Fed.R.Evid. 402 | 23 | +| Local Rule 16.2(G)(2) | 52 | +| Local Rule 26.1(g). | 17 | +| Rule 501 | 48 | + +A, g + +## STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION + +Appellees Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (hereinafter "the victims") have a pending motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons articulated in that motion, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. + +## STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND STATEMENT OF FA + +In the district court, the victims have alleged the followin 1 It which the district court properly assumed to be true in ruling on al discovery motion of appellants Roy Black, Weinberg, a e pstein (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Epstein") to disclosure of certain correspondence.' + +## The Epstein Investigatio SI .,the Non-Prosecution Agreement + +In 2006, the Federal B x?? vestigation opened an investigation into allegations that Epstein een sexually abusing underage girls over the C) proceeding five yea e United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Fl accepted the case for prosecution, and in June, 2007 and August, Qe FBI issued victim notification letters to the appellees, Jane Doe No. 1 an Jane Doe No.2. + +Extensive plea discussions then ensued between the U.S. Attorney's Office + +All of the following facts are taken from the District Court's recent decision, denying the Government's Motion to Dismiss, District Court Docket Entry (DE) 189, the Victims' Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 48), an affidavit supporting discovery (DE 225-1), and related orders. + +and Epstein, a politically-connected billionaire represented by a battery of highpowered attorneys. On September 24, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with Epstein, in which it agreed not to file any federal charges against Epstein in exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to two minor state offenses. 2 The Office entered into thee~i without t first conferring with victims, and without alerting them to AS tence of the agreement, either before or promptly after the fact — faq :5 e Government apparently concedes. + +The U.S. Attorney's Office then kept agreement for roughly nine months, g "no mention of the NPA in intervening correspondence and verb I unications between the victims, the FBI, and the local United Sta t ey s Office. See DE 48 at 7-20. The postagreement deception incl es uary 10, 2008, letters from the U.S. Attorney's Office to both Jane o. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 advising that the case "is currently un tigation" and that "it can be a lengthy process and we request tinned patience while we conduct a thorough investigation." Id. at 16. letter (other letters like it up through at least May 2008) did not inform the victims that Epstein had months earlier already entered into a non-prosecution agreement regarding the crimes committed against them, a fact that Epstein AC2 in the dark about the + +2 The charges were solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors to engage in prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. §§796.07 and 796.03. + +concedes. See Appellant's (Appt's) Br. at 2 ("In September, 2007, . . . Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the Government."). In addition, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent a letter to the victims' counsel in June, 2008, asking them to submit a letter expressing on why federal charges should be filed against Epstein — without disclosing that the U.S. Attorney ice had already entered into the NPA blocking the filing of such charg + +This post-agreement deception was done specif the behest of Epstein. The victims have specifically alleged that .S. Attorney's Office pushed by Epstein — wanted the non-prosec eement kept from public view because of the intense public cc at would have resulted from allowing a politically-connected bil who had sexually abused more than 30 minor girls to escape fro d 1 prosecution with only a county court jail sentence. DE 48 at 11. e v funs have also alleged that the Office wanted the agreement concealed time because of the possibility that the victims could have object t t e agreement in court and perhaps convinced the judge review' greement not to accept it. Id. It is undisputed that extensive negotiati s took place between Epstein and prosecutors regarding crime victim notifications — negotiations that lead to the Government not providing notifications to Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2. Id. at 13-14; see also DE 225-1 at 50. The Government has further admitted that its negotiations with + +defense counsel regarding victim notifications was not standard practice. DE 225-1 at 50. + +Ultimately, on June 27, 2008, the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the Epstein case contacted victims' counsel to advise that Epstein was scheduled to plead guilty to certain state court charges on Ju 0, 2008, again without mentioning that the anticipated plea in the state c as the result of the pre-existing agreement with the federal authorities. t 19-20. + +On June 30, 2008, Epstein pled guilty to the law charges. Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 did not attend th j ing because they did not know about the existence of the NPA; 4 d They know that this guilty plea would block the filing of federal ch ' r Epstein's crimes against them. Id. Af at 19. + +On July 3, 2008, 'cti 4 4\*1 ' counsel sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office advising that!We' Doe No. 1 wished to see federal charges brought against Epst course, when counsel drafted that letter, he did not know that E s entered into a non-prosecution agreement barring such charges ten mont earlier. Id. at 20. + +## Procedural History Surrounding the Victims' CVRA Petition + +The victims' counsel began to hear rumors that Epstein was working out some sort of an arrangement with the U.S. Attorney's Office, an arrangement that was not be disclosed to the victims. Accordingly, on July 7, 2008, Jane Doe No. 1 filed an "emergency" petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, contending that Epstein was currently involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petitio E 1 at 3. Arguing that they had been wrongfully excluded from thos 14 sions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights o r with federal prosecutors; to be treated with fairness; to receive c ' notice of relevant court proceedings and to receive information about h 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)). to restitution. Id. (citing + +On July 9, 2008, the governm t ts response, disclaiming application of the CVRA to pre-indi egotiations with prospective defendants. Alternatively, the governi i contended it did use its "best efforts" to comply with the CVRA' ents in its dealings with Jane Doe No. 1. DE 13. + +On J 08, the District Court held a hearing on the initial petition. D E 1 5. the course of that hearing, the Court allowed Jane Doe No. 2 to be added as an additional victim. The Government acknowledged that both Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 met the CVRA's definition of "crime victims." + +During that hearing, for the first time victims' counsel began to learn that + +the Government and Epstein had concluded a NPA months earlier. See DE 15 at 24. The District Court then inquired, in view of the fact that the agreement was at least nine months old, whether the proceedings could still be regarded as an emergency. Having just learned that the NPA was executed months earlier, victim's counsel agreed that he could see no reason why the mattered to be handled on an emergency basis. DE 15 at 25. + +The District Court indicated that the case woul development, and the Government and victims' c sel 0C9 stipulated set of facts. Later, on August 21, District Court provided a copy of the NPA to the victims. DE 26. agreed to reach a + +Over the following months (th S yitims attempted (unsuccessfully) to negotiate an agreed statemen with the Government about how the NPA was negotiated without pr t also pursued collate or"vil claims against Epstein, during which they also learned facts le t to their CVRA suit. For example, Epstein produced to the victims' significant parts of the correspondence concerning the NPA. The victims u tely successfully settled their civil cases with Epstein. them an opportunity to confer regarding it. They + +The victims, however, were unsuccessful in reaching any agreement with the Government regarding the CVRA case. Because the Government refused to reach any stipulated set of facts, on March 21, 2011, the victims filed a Motion for Finding of Violations of the CVRA and a supporting statement of facts. DE 48. They also filed a motion to use the correspondence that they had previously received from Epstein in the civil case in their CVRA case. DE 51. + +## Procedural History Regarding Releasing the Correspondence + +On April 7, 2011, two of Epstein's numerous criminal defens a orneys appellants Roy Black and Weinberg — filed a Q,for limited intervention in the case, arguing that their right to con tiality in the correspondence would be violated if the victims' re allowed to use the correspondence. DE 56. Jeffrey Epstein filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the co c . DE 93. Later, Epstein and his attorneys filed a motion for protectiv asking the Court to bar release of the correspondence. DE 160. int, however, did Epstein or his attorneys provide any affidavits o er factual information establishing that the t correspondence was dential. Nor did they provide a privilege log or other description o terials in question. + +e intervention motions were pending, on September 26, 2011, the DistrictCourt entered its order partially granting the victims' motion for a finding of violations of the CVRA, recognizing that the CVRA can apply before formal charges are filed against an accused. DE 99. The Court, however, denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted, instead deferring ruling on the + +merits of the victims' claims pending development of a full factual record. The Court also authorized the victims to conduct limited discovery. DE 99 at 11. The victims quickly requested discovery from the Government, including correspondence between the Government and Epstein's attorneys regarding the non-prosecution agreement. + +On November 8, 2011, the day on which the Gove 7Q was due to produce discovery, it instead moved to dismiss the ent' proceeding for alleged lack of subject matter jurisdiction (DE 119), ccessfully sought a stay of discovery (DE 121, 123). The victims file nse. DE 127. + +On March 29, 2012, the district ed to the motions to intervene, granting both Epstein's motion to in E 159) and his attorneys' motion to intervene (DE 158). The j e hasized, however, that the question of the merits of the intervenors' ns remained to be determined. + +After additionatoe eedings, on June 18, 2013, the district court denied Epstein's elf ar release of the plea bargain correspondence. DE 188. The District gan by noting that the same arguments that Epstein was raising had previ ly been rejected in one of the victims' parallel federal civil lawsuits, and it saw "no reason to revisit that ruling here." Id. at 3-4. The District Court then rejected Epstein's argument that the correspondence was protected under Fed. R. Evid. 410, because that Rule by its own terms does not apply in situations where a defendant later pleads guilty. The District Court next rejected Epstein's argument that it should invent a new "plea negotiations" privilege that would apply to the correspondence, explaining that "Congress has already addressed the competing policy interests raised by plea discussion evidence with the passage of the pleastatement rules found at Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(0 and Fed. R. Evid 4 0, which generally prohibits admission at trial of a defendant's statement during plea discussions, without carving out any special privilege rel lb ea discussion materials. Considering the Congressional forbear n this issue — and the presumptively public nature of plea agreem is District —, this court declines the intervenors' invitation to ule 410 by crafting a federal common law privilege for plea discus DE 188 at 7-8. + +The next day, the Dis entered a detailed written opinion denying the Government's motion Oo • miss. DE 189. After carefully reviewing the t CVRA's remedial pi •ons, the Court explained that "the CVRA is properly interpreted to "ze the rescission or `re-opening' of a prosecutorial agreement — inclu -prosecution agreement — reached in violation of the prosecutor's conferral ligation under the statute." DE 189 at 7. In light of this conclusion, the District Court explained that it was then "obligated to decide whether, as crime victims, petitioners have asserted valid reasons why the court should vacate or reopen the non-prosecution agreement reached between Epstein and the [U.S. denied the motion to stay, explaining: A On June 27, 2013, Epstein and his attorneys filed a notice of ap a from the District Court's denial of efforts of block release of S ; lea e bargain correspondence. DE's 194-96. Epstein also filed for a s ng appeal (DE 193), and the victims filed a response in oppositionV 198). The district court + +Attorney's Office]. Whether the evidentiary proofs will entitle them to that relief is a question properly reserved for determination upon a fully developed evidentiary record." DE 189 at 11-12. The Court then ordered the Government to begin to produce the requested discovery. DE 190. + +In this case, intervenors have e 4emonstrated a probable likelihood of success on the m ppeal, see e.g. In re MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337 (7th Cir. ejecting request for recognition of new privilege for s discussions; finding need for confidence and trust sufficient reason to create a new privilege, and notin ngress, in enacting Fed. R. Civ. Evid. 408, governing a of statements made during "compromise negotiations, " did n ake additional step of protecting settlement negotiations discovery); In re Qwest Communications Internati 1, In ., 450 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2006) (noting circuit courts' a nanimous rejection of selective waiver concept as appl orney-client and work-product privileges), nor that the equities weighs heavily in favor of granting a stay. + +## STANDARD OF REVIEW + +1. The victims first present the issue that Epstein has failed to develop a factual record to support his claim that the correspondence in question is confidential. This issue is a purely factual one, which this Court would review by giving due deference issue to the District Court in managing discovery matters. World Holdings, LLC v. Federal Republic of Germany, 701 F.3d 641, 649 (11th Cir. 2012). + +2. The District Court rejected Epstein's claim that corresponAgg 1: by his 41 e attorneys was protected from discovery by Rule 410 for two rea 0first, because it was not general discussions of leniency and statemen min the hope of avoiding a federal indictment rather than plea nuns; and, second, that it 4i involved negotiations for charges to which Ep 1 ' ately plead guilty. These are both factual findings, for which revi i ted to determining whether the district court "had an adequate fac a is for the decision it rendered" and whether the decision was c neous." Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States, 5 CF. ) 1235, 1244 (11th Cir. 2008). + +3. Epstein ask IZIty' Court to overturn the District Court's decision not to recognize a vilege for plea bargaining. This Court has held that "a new privileg only be recognized where there is a `compelling justification." Internati al Horizons, Inc. v. The Committee of Unsecured Creditors, 689 F.2d 996, 1004 (11th Cir.1982) (internal quotation omitted). The issue is thus whether the District Court erred in finding no such compelling justification. + +## SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT + +Appellants Jeffrey Epstein and his attorneys argue that they have some sort of interest in the confidentiality of correspondence that they sent to government prosecutors — prosecutors who were attempting convict their client of sex offenses. The district court properly rejected their argument and this Court shoo ffirm the decision below for three reasons. + +1. Epstein never developed any evidentiary record trict court that the correspondence in question was confidential. rdltsgly, he has simply failed to establish the required factual record to t n to challenge the District Court's conclusions. Bogle v. McClure ak F d 1347, 1358 (11th Cir. 2003) (noting privilege holder not "excus 4 11 (ineeting [his] burden of proving the communication confidential he [applicable] privilege"). + +2. Rule 410 of e F eral Rules of Evidence does not apply to bar discovery of the co dence, because (a) the Rule does not apply where a criminal defent pleads guilty; (b) the District Court's factual finding that the correspo i as not primarily plea negotiations was not clearly erroneous; (c) entirely from whether they can use the correspondence against Epstein, the victims can discover the correspondence to use against the Government; (d) Rule 410 does not, in any event, even apply to the early discovery phase of litigation; (e) + +no work product privilege exists over correspondence that was exchanged by Epstein with his adversaries. + +3. This Court should not create a new privilege for plea bargaining in this case, because Rule 410 provides sufficient protection for such negotiations and the Court should not undermine the Crime Victims' Rights Act. + +AA' This Court should also dismiss Epstein's appeal because jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal of a discovery dispute. + +## ARGUMENT + +In the District Court, the victims have Epstein and the Government agreed to 'non- \ further agreed to conceal it from the lfor many months. The District Court has ordered the Goverment 3Epstein's brief to this Court does now contain several quotations from the oral arguments of his attorney's below. See, e.g., Appt's Br. at 19. The arguments do not provide proof of the factual propositions that would be required to sustain his privilege claims. And, more fundamentally, arguments are not evidence. + +However, upon intervention, Movant Epstein will have to meet his burden of establishing that he was in fact represented by specific attorneys, and that they had privileged communications in the course of that attorney-client relationship that have been or are at the risk of, unauthorized disclosure. Movant Epstein bears the burden of establishing that the communications he seeks to withhold from disclosure fall within the attorney-client or other privilege. "In meeting this burden, each element of the privilege must be affirmatively demonstrated, and the party claiming privileg st provide the court with evidence that demonstrates the waste so privilege, which often is accomplished by affidavit." + +DE 98 at 3-4 (emphasis added) (quoting El-Ad Resident armar Condo. Ass 'n, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 716 F. Supp. 2dc) 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2010)). Rather than heed that specific warning from rnment that he needed to provide "evidence that demonstrates tJ 4ist cc of the privilege," Epstein decided to provide nothing at all .4 + +The victims, too, spect ed to the District Court that, for example, "Epstein must present ev ncp that he will be injured if the victims read the correspondence." warning, Eps ted not to heed the warning given by the victims. D ?Iflrat 11 (emphasis added). As with the Government's + +In othing exists in the record that would allow Epstein to carry his burden o roof that the correspondence was confidential. That failure is fatal to + +At various points in his brief, Epstein claims that the Government supports his appeal. But the Government has not chosen to join this appeal and, to the contrary, has indicated to the District Court that is has collected all of the materials at issue and stands ready to deliver them to victims as soon as this Court permits it. See, e.g., DE 216-1 at 9 (noting correspondence with Epstein's defense counsel that will be produced to opposing counsel upon lifting of stay). + +appeal. See, e.g., In re Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, 439 F.3d 740, 754 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (rejecting privilege claim where appellant "failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the disputed subpoenaed documents were created for the purpose of settlement discussions and therefore would merit protection under any federal settlement privileg . ."). + +## II. THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWE THE GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN IS NOT CTED FROM DISCOVERY BY FEDERAL R ENCE 410 OR BY THE WORK PRODUCT DOC + +Epstein's lead argument is that the co nce is protected from discovery by Federal Rule of Evidence 41 the work product doctrine. Appt's Br. at 14-24. He is situp ( t, as no protection exists for correspondence he voluntarily se fedc 1 prosecutors. + +## A. RULE NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE BECAUSE THE SCUSSIONS LEAD TO A GUILTY PLEA. + +Rule 410 is fun 7, entally inapplicable here because it is designed to protect defendants w lyS re c naked with a presumption of innocence, not those (like convicte o ender Epstein) who have plead guilty to a crime. Because "Rule 410 is ception to the general principle that all relevant evidence is admissible at trial, see Fed.R.Evid. 402, its limitations are not to be read broadly." United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005). Here Epstein pled guilty to + +state sex offenses as part of his far-ranging plea discussions with federal prosecutors, so the rule does not apply. + +While Epstein repeatedly argues that the correspondence falls within the "heartland" of Rule 410 (Appt's Br. at 7), he never argues that it falls within the text of the Rule. Rule 410 provides in its entirety: + +## Rule 410. Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statement + +(a) Prohibited Uses. In a civil or criminal case, ev f the following is not admissible against the defendant wjl the plea or participated in the plea discussions: + +- (1) a guilty plea that was later withdrawn; +- (2) a nolo contendere plea; +- (3) a statement made during a proc either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal P for a comparable state procedure; or +- (4) a statement made durin cussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authori iscussions did not result in a guilty plea or they res ater-withdrawn guilty plea. + +(b) Exceptions. The co t admit a statement described in Rule 410(a)(3) or (4); + +- (1) in any proce n ifi which another statement made during the same plea r plea iscussions has been introduced, if in fairness the stateme ht to be considered together, or +- (2) i criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement, if the de ade the statement under oath, on the record, and with present. + +Althougpstein has not made a factual record about what the correspondence involves (see Part I, supra), he appears to argue that the correspondence falls within Rule 410(4), italicized above. But the plain language of that provision is narrowly written to cover only a "statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of + +guilty." Fed. R. Evid. 410(4) (emphasis added). Obviously, a prerequisite to applying the rule is a case where no plea of guilty "resulted" from the discussions. See, e.g., United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5th Cir. 1990) (statements made during negotiations that resulted in a final plea of guilty not protected under Rule 410), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1039 (1991); United States v. Ruhko Azki 814 , F.2d 594, 596 (11th Cir. 1987) (discussing application of the rule i'u. ations where "plea negotiations ... broke down" and case went to trial).5 + +Here, although Epstein evades this central in his brief, his plea discussions undeniably did result in a plea of •n this point, the District Court made a specific finding of fact: ' unications between Epstein's counsel and federal prosecutors at iss t e cs re , ultimately did result in entry of a plea + +5 Cases such as these also that Epstein's protestations that the District Court's decision to releas p e cussion is somehow unprecedented, see, e.g., Appt's Br. at 10, are simp e. Courts sometimes find Rule 410 applies and sometimes that it do ot. n fact, in earlier civil litigation against Epstein, the district court ordered correspondence produced to one of Epstein's sexual assault victims his Rule 410 argument. DE 226, Jane Doe #2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No 0893-MARRA (S.D. Fla. Jan.5, 2011). Like that decision, the decision 1 in this case is simply a routine discovery determination that the con-es n at issue falls outside the protections of Rule 410. Moreover, courts routine override even opinion work product claims in situations where the attorney conduct is at issue in the case. See, e.g., In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1080 (4th Cir. 1981); Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 125 F.R.D. 127, 130 (M.D.N.C. 1989). Of course, in this case the conduct prosecutors and Epstein in reaching the secret non-prosecution agreement is the central element of the case. Indeed, the only thing that is unprecedented about this case is the fact that Epstein and prosecutors choose to negotiate about how to keep crime victims from learning what was happening rather than to comply with the Crime Victims' Rights Act. + +of guilty by Epstein — to specific state charges — thereby removing the statements from the narrow orbit of `statement[s] made during plea discussions . . . if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea . . . " which are inadmissible in proceedings against the defendant making them under Rule 410." DE 188 at 4-5 (emphasis in original). That finding of fact can be overturned only s clearly erroneous. It is not. + +AS' + +Again, while Epstein bears the burden of proof on h ri e claim, he has failed to develop any factual record in support of \*m. See Part I, supra. More specifically, he cannot deny that the non- t on agreement that is at the heart of this case specifically includes a p n or Epstein to plead guilty to two state offenses. The NPA recites tha seeks to resolve globally his state and federal criminal liability tem understands and acknowledges that, in exchange for the benefits d by this agreement, he agrees to comply with its terms, including und ar • g certain actions with the State Attorney's Office." NPA at 2 (e h ad ded).6 The NPA goes on to specifically provide that, in exchang oiding federal prosecution, Epstein will plead guilty to two state offenses: + +Epstein shall plead guilty . . . to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case No. 2006-cf-009495AXXXMB) charging one (1) count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fl. Stat. § 796.07. In + +6For the convenience of the Court, a copy of the NPA is attached to this brief. + +addition, Epstein shall plead guilty to an Information filed by the States Attorney's Office charging Epstein with an offense that requires him to register as a sex offender, that is, the solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.03. + +Id. at 3 (emphases added). And, as the District Court specifically found, Epstein ultimately did plead guilty to those two Florida offenses — and did s uant to the "global" agreement as a result of his plea discussions. DE 1 S. + +While Epstein does not discuss the specific linkage A between the his non-prosecution for federal offenses in exchan pleading guilty to two state charges, he does contend that Rule 410 to guilty pleas to federal offenses. The plain language of Rule 41 not contain any such limitation, narrowly extending protection only t ations that "did not result in a guilty plea" without requiring that tlr,% to a federal charge.' And such a limitation of the rule to guilty pleas Co 51f eral charges only would be extremely unwieldy, since many criminal chow involve discussions that span multiple jurisdictions + +ely flips around this absence of a limitation, contending that if tended to cover situations where defendants pled guilty to state t needed to say so. Appt's Br. at 26. But Congress simply used the plain term "guilty plea" rather than the more cumbersome formulation "guilty plea to a federal, state, or local offense." In the same sentence, Congress also used the broad formulation "prosecuting authority" rather than a narrower, federal formulation such "United States Attorney." Fed. R. Evid. 410(4). Finally, in another part of Rule 410, Congress did see fit to itemize both state and federal proceedings. Fed. It Evid. 410(3). The fact that it chose a broader formulation here makes clear its intention to cover both state and federal pleas in Rule 410(4), as the caselaw holds. + +— which is why defendants, such as Epstein, frequently seek a "global" resolution of their criminal liability. In any event, case law makes quite clear that Rule 410 draws no distinction between federal pleas and state pleas. See, e.g., United States v. Chapman, 954 F.2d 1352, 1360 (7th Cir. 1992) (applying rule to discussions over "withdrawn state plea"); United States v. Kerik, 531 F.Supp.2d 6 D.N.Y. 2008) ("Rule 410 applies in federal proceedings to statements connection with prior state pleas"); see also United States v. 345, 349 (8th Cir.1986) (permitting the admission of a guilty ple orn state court in a federal proceeding). + +The only substantial argument th t'tit,ei makes is that the "substantive settlement discussions thus revolved 31 federal] .1 offenses to which Epstein did not ultimately plead guilty pt's Br. at 27. Of course, this is a factual argument about the natu discussions — a factual argument that lacks any record support. erroneous in ing that correspondence involved global plea discussions that "revolv d" not merely Epstein's non-prosecution for federal charges but also, in e hange, his guilty plea to state charges. not shown that the District Court was clearly + +## B. THE DISTRICT COURT'S FACTUAL FINDING THAT SIGNIFICANT PARTS OF THE CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNED SUBJECTS OTHER THAN PLEA NEGOTIATIONS IS NOT CLEARLY ERRONEOUS. + +As a second reason for denying Epstein's motion to bar release of the correspondence, the District Court made a specific factual finding that significant parts of the correspondence did not involve "plea discussions" Rule 410 but rather general discussions of leniency. Epstein cannot show — that this factual finding is clearly erroneous. t own — and under + +As one reason for finding the corresponden District Court noted that "[a]s a thresho discussions' protected under Fed. R. E of leniency and statements mad arguably the content of th vered by Rule 410, the `statementns during plea o not include general discussions ope of avoiding a federal indictment ndence at issue here." DE 188 at 4. For support, the District Court ' the relevant case law from this Court (as well as from other Cou ; of peals). See DE 188 at 4 (citing United States v. Merrill, 685 F.3d 1O11 Cir. 2012) (statements made to AUSA during meetings were not s made during plea negotiations under Rule 410, where there were no pending charges against defendant when discussions occurred; general discussion of leniency did not transform meeting into plea negotiations)); see also DE 188 at 4 (citing United States v. Edelmann, 458 F.3d 791, 804-06 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. Hare, 49 F.3d 447, 450 (8th Cir. 1995). This is a factual finding by the + +District Court, based on its familiarity with the correspondence. The Court reviews such a finding only to determine whether it is clearly erroneous. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, No. 4-10, 707 F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir. 2013) (factual determination underlying privilege rulings reviewed only for clear error). + +Epstein does not contend that the District Court misun i tood the applicable legal standards. Instead, Epstein launches a fa contending that "the best proof that the communications %ere not merely `general discussion of leniency' is that they u c 'onably n challenge, resulted in an agreement which settled the federal criminal i of Epstein." Appt's Br. at 24-25. The Court will notice that this 'Sc ment comes unadorned of any citations to the record below. No do t fs because Epstein has simply failed to create any record below. Tht vxh Epstein says it is "unquestionably" true that the communications were 6of e'neral discussions of leniency, the victims would simply respond that indeed in question — because the District Court has specifically tw6ctual finding to the contrary. + +moreover, have very specific reasons for raising doubt about whether of the correspondence focused as narrowly on the "plea discussions," that the rule protects. See Fed. R. Evid. 410(4) (extending protection only to "plea discussions"). The victims have made detailed allegations that significant parts of the correspondence deal with Epstein's defense attorneys attempting to improperly + +interfere with the Government's required notifications to them under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. For example, the victims have alleged that on November 29, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent to Jay Leflcowitz, one of Epstein's many defense lawyers, a draft crime victim notification letter which would have explained the NPA to Epstein's multiple victims. DE 48 at 13. The ims have further alleged that because of concerns from Epstein's e attorneys (presumably communicated in writing as part of the corres on at issue here), the U.S. Attorney's Office did not send that propos tim notification letter to victims, but instead sent a misleading left e case was "still under investigation." Id. Whatever may be th \ Rule 410 protections for "plea discussions," it certainly would not e 8 Epstein has not argued — either in his brief to this Court or in the court below that the correspondence at issue can be separated into documents that involve plea discussions and those that do not. And, of course, he has not provided a privilege log or other basis for making any such a discriminating, document-by-document judgment. Accordingly, the District Court's ruling about the general nature of all the documents must be affirmed. + +## C. RULE 410 DOES NOT APPLY HERE BECAUSE THE VICTIMS CAN USE THE CORRESPONDENCE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT. + +Although the District Court did not need to reach them, several other grounds apparent in the record support the ruling below. This Court should affirm on these grounds as well. v. Lighting, Inc., 506 F.34 61 1364 (11th Cir.2007) (judgment below can be affirmed on any ground a Eent from the record ).9 + +Rule 410 is inapplicable here because it would o , ar admissibility of the correspondence into evidence "against the d who made the plea," Fed. It. Evid. 410 — i.e., against Jeffrey Epst the victims intend initially to obtain and use the correspondence t4u further discovery and to seek relief from the Government. Indeed rfct court's order requiring production of the correspondence is not d To ) Epstein at all — it is directed solely to the Government. DE 19 + +By its rms, Rule 410 only bars the admission of evidence "against the defe o made the plea." Fed. R. Evid. 410. The purpose underlying this rule to "promote negotiations by permitting defendants to talk to prosecutors without sacrificing their ability to defend themselves if no disposition is reached." United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir.2005) (emphases added). + +9 The victims raised these arguments below, DE 106 at 5-13, but the District Court did not need to consider them. + +Thus, the Rule has no application where the discussions are being used not against a defendant but rather against the Government. See, e.g., United States v. Biaggi, 909 F.2d 662, 691 (2d Cir. 1990) (holding that under Rule 410 "plea negotiations are inadmissible `against the defendant' . . . and it does not necessarily follow that the Government is entitled to a similar shield"). A + +Here, the victims intend to use the correspondence to pro ti illy e that the Government violated their CVRA rights.10 Having pro n lation of their rights, they will then seek various remedies agains Government." As they have made clear throughout this litigation, they 1 . ately intend to ask for the Court to impose (among other things) eremedy that will most directly respond to the Government's viola heir rights: invalidation of the nonprosecution agreement so the confer with the Government about the possibility of actually pr ecu i g Epstein for the sex offenses he committed against them. Epstein ers claim that any such use would be a use "against" the defenda n erefore covered by this language in Rule 410. This claim, howeve , that the Rule 410 bars every court action that might ultimately have som collateral, harmful effect on a defendant. But Rule 410 is much more + +1° The victims do not believe they stand in an adversarial posture with the Government, as Congress has obligated the Government to use its "best efforts" to protect the CVRA rights of crime victims. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). + +II A list of the remedies that the victims intend to seek from the Government is found in DE 127 at 13-15. + +narrowly drafted — forbidding not uses that may eventually hann the defendant, but instead more narrowly admissibility of plea negotiations into evidence directly "against the defendant" in a "civil or criminal proceeding." Fed. R. Evid. 410.12 + +In any event, regardless of how that issue ultimately plays out, at this early point in the District Court proceedings, the victims are still conductin i overy in an attempt to prove to the District Court that the Gove failed in its obligations to properly confer with the victims about A. Obtaining discovery is obviously not a use against Epste. ule 410 is accordingly inapplicable. + +## D. RULE 410 DOES N tR\ISCOVERY el OF THE CORRESPONDX . + +Epstein's reliance on Rule is aro plainly premature. By its plain terms, the rule does not apply to v . Instead, it bars only the admissibility of "evidence" against the defe tin a "proceeding." See Fed. R. Evid. 410 (barring use of certain "e \*denc m a "civil or criminal proceeding"). The Rule thus does not apply tedi covery phase at all. See In re MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337 (7th ? s i + +12 EpsteiII also argues that it would be improper for the District Court to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement, even if the victims prove a deliberate agreement between the Government and him that lead to an agreement reached in violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. Appt's Br. at 16 n.4. This issue is not currently before this Court. As Epstein concedes, however, the District Court has already ruled against his legal position in a detailed opinion. DE 189. And, as the victims have argued at length below, there is ample basis for a District Court to set aside an illegal plea agreement. See DE 127 at 8-13. + +Cir. 2012) (noting that Congress, in enacting Fed. R. Civ. Evid. 408, governing admissibility of statements made during "compromise negotiations," did not take additional step of protecting settlement negotiations from discovery). + +Confirming the discoverability of plea discussions are the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 410. Advisory Committee explains that originally drafted to forbid use of plea discussions "for an Evid. 410, Advisory Committee Note to 1974 Enactment. specifically amended by the Senate to allow use o 19 statements statements have been introduced (a purposes. Id. ule was ." Fed. R. the Rule was where other "comple " rovision) and for perjury + +Of particular relevance here, th protected plea bargaining s Cst)h course of the same plea discussions has been ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously another statement made introduced and the s eteness provision provides that even a is admissible "in any proceeding wherein with it." F .')d. 410(b)(2). Here, the Government has already made it quite clear in i ings that it will introduce certain statements about the course of the plea egotiations. See, e.g., DE 225-1 at 45-56 (Government response to request for admission); DE 58 at 10-14 (Government version of contested facts). From these pleadings, it is clear the Government intends to introduce many statements about the timing and course of plea discussions. For example, in its + +response to the victims' summary judgment motion, the Government makes clear that it intends to argue that it properly conferred with the victims over eighteen months. See DE 62 at 37. Similarly, the Government intends to dispute that after it entered into the NPA with Epstein it sent misleading notices to the victims about the case still being "under investigation"). Id. at 41. It is simply for the Government to be able to pick and choose from all the events s cS ding the plea negotiations only those that support its case, while dep g victims of the opportunity to even discover information that might their case. See Frontier Ref, Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co., Inc., 136 F.3d 9 10th Cir. 1998) (a litigant cannot use privilege "as both a sword an b selectively using the privileged documents to prove a point but then the privilege to prevent an opponent from challenging the assertio d Rule 410 in particular blocks such a onesided approach. Instead, der e Rule, the victims are entitled to show the full course of plea discus )tilvat any ultimate hearing in this case about whether the Government their CVRA rights. + +ct Court has already ruled that important factual questions exist about wh happened in this case: "Whether the evidentiary proofs will entitle [the victims] to that relief [of setting aside the non-prosecution agreement] is a question properly reserved for determination upon a fully developed evidentiary record." DE 189 at 11-12. The Court has further indicated that it will be considering an + +"estoppel" argument raised by the Government as a defense in this case. DE 189 at 12 n.6. The Court has noted that this argument "implicates a fact-sensitive equitable defense which must be considered in the historical factual context of the entire interface between Epstein, the relevant prosecutorial authorities and the federal offense victims — including an assessment of the allegation o eliberate conspiracy between Epstein and federal prosecutors to keep the 0 ' AS in the dark on the pendency of negotiations between Epstein and fede a ities until well after the fact and presentation of the non-prosecutic ement to them as a fait accompli." DE 189 at 12 n.6 (emphasis compelling need for information about "entire interface" was and to respon well as other defenses that it a e victims thus have a ent's actions to show what the Government's estoppel arguments, as be preparing to raise. + +Finally, this Court t from use at trial, "d it've evidence" obtained from plea discussion is never S -d States v. Ruhkowsi, 814 F.2d 594, 599 (11th Cir. 1987). n if Rule 410 were somehow applicable to later proceedings here, are free to obtain the correspondence now and follow whatever excluded. Accord' the victi noted that even if plea discussions are excluded discovery leads it may provide. In light of all these points, it is obvious that Epstein's efforts to contort Rule 410 into a barrier barring discovery by the victims against the Government is meritless. + +## E. THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE DOES NOT APPLY TO CORRESPONDENCE WITH AN ADVERSARY. + +At various points in his briefing to this Court, Epstein seems to allude to the work product doctrine as having some bearing on the correspondence at issue. Appt's Br. at 12 (argument heading mentioning work product doctrine). But Epstein never develops this argument at any length in his brief. plicit argument that the work product doctrine bars release of the co n nce should be rejected. + +Perhaps the reason Epstein has not pressed 4 length is because it would be nonsensical to t the work product doctrine applies to correspondence between advl er prosecutors and defense attorneys do not operate in a confidential re roduct argument at any + +Case law is clear tha sc 'sure to an adversary waives the work product protection as to items ly disclosed, even where disclosure occurs in settlement." In s e rysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litigation, O2 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988). In summarily rejecting Epstein's claim, istrict Court found that Epstein had waived any work product protection in the materials by turning them over to the federal prosecutors: + +Assuming without deciding that any part of the correspondence in question reflects "the mental impressions, conclusions, or legal theories" of Epstein's attorneys, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3), any work product protection which might otherwise attach to this product was necessarily forfeited when Epstein voluntarily submitted the + +information to the United States Attorney's Office in the hopes of receiving the quid pro quo of lenient punishment for any wrongdoings exposed in the process. Work product protection is provided only against "adversaries." Thus, disclosure of the material to an adversary, real or potential, works a forfeiture of work product protection. In this case, Epstein's attorneys' disclosure to the United States Attorney's Office was plainly a disclosure to a potential adversary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evid ce relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females wi e Southern District of Florida and deliberating the filing o ev t federal charges; while Epstein's counsel clearly hoped • id any actual litigation between the United States and Epstein ential for such litigation was plainly there. By voluntaril berating disclosing this material to federal prosecu a authorities investigating allegations against Epstein at V time, any work product protection was necessarily lost. + +DE 188 at 6 (citing, inter alia, United 4114; 1.%" . Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 129 F.3d 681 (1st Cir. 19 e' , W erous cases have reached the same conclusion as the District Court inClil circumstances. 13 + +13 See, e.g., Westinghouse 1414, 1429 (3d Cir. 1 1 the Justice Departmen as against all 1179, 1192 during c Metho work p question), In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation, 293 F.3d 289, 302 (6th Cir. 2002) (attorney client/work product privilege was "never designed to protect conversations between a client and the Government — i.e., an adverse party — rather, it pertains only to conversations between the client and his or her attorney. . . purpose [of attorney-client privilege] is to encourage Ml and communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice. Nowhere amongst these reasons [for protection] is the ability to `talk candidly with c Corp. v. Republic of the Philippines, 951 F.2d estinghouse's disclosure of work product materials to ng an investigation "waived the work-product doctrine er ad ersaries."); In re Qwest Communications, Inc., 450 F.3d Cir. 2006) (company's disclosure of documents to the SEC investigation waived work product protections); United h v. City of Cheyenne, 451 F.3d 643, 668 (10th Cir. 2005) ("any objection was waived by [party] via production" of the documents in + +Moreover, as the District Court made clear, it was simply "assuming" without deciding that the correspondence could properly be described as work product. To obtain a reversal from this Court of the District Court's decision, Epstein would need to prove that the materials actually are work product materials. Again, he has failed to build any record to that effect in the District Co + +In any event, any such attempt would be doomed to failur 'ficant parts of the correspondence obviously could not even arguably a i work-product, such as Epstein's lawyer's efforts to get the ment notifications to crime victims. Moreover, Ep\ t %o Id have to prove that the correspondence was prepared in anticipa gation. Many such documents were presumably not so prepared, a ainly not prepared in anticipation of litigation about the Crime Vi ns is Act. See, e.g., Southern Union Co. v. to stop making Southwest Gas Corp., 2 F. t D. 542, 549 (IX Ariz. 2002) (documents not protected by work pro 'tlefrbecause not prepared in connection with case at hand); + +t A Car System, Inc., 916 F.Supp. 256, 259 (W.D.N.Y.,1996) (no wor ct existed because "the documents sought were not prepared in + +the Gove ent.'"); In re Chrysler Motors Overnight Evaluation Litigation, 860 F.2d 844, 846-47 (84' 1988) (defendant company's disclosure of computer tape to class counsel during settlement negotiated waived work product when tape sought by government as part of criminal case); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 824-25 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (production of documents during settlement discussions with the SEC waived work product protection as to grand jury materials). + +anticipation of this particular litigation") (internal quotation omitted and emphasis added)). + +It is also important to emphasize that the work-product is a qualified privilege, subject to a host of exceptions and ultimately a balancing of interests to determine whether the doctrine should be applied. One of the most . \_mg ortant is the fact that one of the parties to the correspondence — the G aIS ent — has a statutory obligation to uses its "best efforts" to protect c rights. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). In light of that clear statutory c d, the Government has its own independent obligation to use the ence to help protect the victims' rights, including providing the c n ence to the victims. See DE 106 at 17-18; see also DE 226 at 12-14 ch work product confidentiality can operate in such circumstan s, ch further underscores the fact that any purported "reliance" by th cde , se attorneys on the idea that the correspondence would not be provide'Pt\*victims was unreasonable. + +Work is also subject to a crime-fraud-misconduct exception. See Cox v. ator U.S. Steel & Carnie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1422 (1 1 th Cir. 1994). The vic have alleged in detail that such an exception applies in connection with the Government's attempt to assert work product protection to internal Justice Department documents. See DE 225-1 at 23. The same exceptions would prevent Epstein from prevailing on any (as of yet undeveloped) work production assertion. + +For all these reasons, the Court should reject Epstein's claim that its correspondence with prosecutors during plea negotiations somehow is confidential work product immune from discovery. + +## Ill. THE DISTRICT COURT PROPERLY CONCLUDED THAT CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN IS NOT PROTECTED FROM DISciaVERY BY SOME KIND OF "COMMON LA PLEA BARGAINING PRIVILEGE. + +For all the reasons just given, Rule 410 (and the wgrijufct doctrine) do not bar the victims from discovering correspon ut how the nonprosecution agreement was reached. Perhaps ing the weakness of this argument, Epstein raises as a final, fallb that the District Court erred in ow" privilege for "settlement/plea s declining to recognize a new "coillon y negotiation communications too, lacks any merit. cases." Appt's Br at 28. This argument, + +### A. URTS CANNOT CREATE A "COMMON LAW" es iP EGE THAT OVERULES THE LIMITATIONS OF RULE 410 AND THE STATUTORY COMMANDS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT. + +asks this Court to invent some sort of new "common law" privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. But the Supreme Court has been clear, however, that courts must "not create and apply an evidentiary privilege unless it promotes sufficiently important interests to outweigh the need for probative evidence. Inasmuch as testimonial exclusionary rules and privileges contravene the fundamental principle that the public has a right to every man's evidence, any such privilege must be strictly construed." University of Pennsylvania v. E.E.O.C., 493 U.S. 182, 189 (1990) (internal quotations omitted). + +While Epstein does not cite the controlling legal standard for creating a privilege in this Circuit, this Court has strongly cautioned that "th circuit is that a new privilege should only be recognized `compelling justification.'" International Horizons, Inc. this there is a Committee of Unsecured Creditors, 689 F.2d 996, 1004 (11th Cir Acy (quoting In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426 (5th Cir.1981)). This Court h ' ed that this stringent rule arises from the federal courts' disfavo j , lieges and from the policy of construing privileges narrowly, so as 'is) ect the "search for truth." 689 F.2d at 1003 (quoting United States v o 18 U.S. 683 (1974)). + +Here, this Court hap reason to be skeptical of a new plea bargaining privilege. The transtt purpose behind Epstein's "common law" effort is to avoid the s itations contained in Rule 410 — limitations that prevent him from av: elf of Rule 410. See Part II, supra. But the Supreme Court has made cl that courts must be "especially reluctant to recognize a privilege in an area where it appears that Congress has considered the relevant competing concerns but has not provided the privilege itself." University of Pennsylvania v. E.E.O.C., 493 U.S. 182, 189 (1990) (internal quotation omitted). This Court + +should not use the general provisions of Rule 501 to effectively supersede the detailed limitations contained in Rule 410. + +In addition, Epstein's argument would require this Court to supersede the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The CVRA promises crime victims a series of rights, including rights specifically at issue in this case: the right to o fer with prosecutors, to be notified of court hearings, and to be treated g fairness. e 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(2) & (5) & (8). The CVRA further co that the courts have specific obligations to "ensure" that crime vi V • •ghts are protected. 18 9 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(1) ("the court shall ensure me victim is afforded the rights described [in the CVRA] . ..."). , it is to "ensure" that such rights are protected for Jane Doe No. land J n oe No. 2, two acknowledged victims of Epstein's sex offenses, that th Court has ordered the Government to make the correspondence avai ble o them. The District Court properly gave t precedence to the pr po• n of statutorily-created rights over Epstein's alleged "common la ege. + +> NO "COMMON LAW" PRIVILEGE FOR PLEA BARGAINING EXISTS. + +Even if this Court were willing to entertain the idea that it should embark on an exercise of "common law" privilege making, no common law privilege exists for plea bargaining. While Epstein frequently alludes to "constitutional considerations" that supposedly undergird plea bargaining, the simple fact remains City, 327 F.3d 1186, 1195 (11th Cir. 2 any occasion for considering the sco right to counsel interests. Moreover, were the Court to consider creating such a be a poor case in which to do so. Epstein is forced to ad P A this would east in federal court, his Sixth Amendment rights have not yet a in this case, because no indictment has yet been filed. See Appt's Br. , e Lampley v. City of Dade fore, this case does not present rivilege to protect Sixth Amendment + +In addition, as is pa <)c t from the District Court's rulings, this case involves a highly un !hot situation where crime victims have raised credible allegations o gement between prosecutors and defense attorneys to violate statutori aced crime victims' rights. Indeed, the Government has recently admitted at "[i]t is not standard practice for the U.S. Attorney's Office to + +that "there is no constitutional right to plea bargain." Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 561 (1977). To be sure, the courts tolerate widespread plea bargaining because it helps reduce the workload of congested criminal dockets. But common law rulemaking should not be used to exalt administrative convenience over the far more important value of the search for truth.14 + +14Of course, if their client wishes, defense counsel should always explore plea bargaining opportunities. See Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S.C.t 1473, 1485 (2010). But this is a far cry from proving there is a "right" to plea bargaining or that protecting plea bargaining opportunities is more important than, for example, protecting congressionally-mandated crime victims' rights conferred in the CVRA. + +negotiate with defense attorneys about the extent of notifications provided to crime victims," DE 225-1 at 50, negotiations that it nonetheless undertook in this case. Id. Accordingly, were the Court to even consider creating a new privilege, it would be doing so in circumstances that do not reflect ordinary plea bargaining practices. + +Make no mistake about the sweeping position that Epstein is a s cing: He is not arguing that this Court should recognize a narrow p that would prevent the victims from using any admissions of gui y have made. Instead, Epstein is broadly claiming that his defense eys and the Government can agree between themselves to undertake discussions — even in N violation of congressionally-mandated c • Act tett rights in the CVRA — and then later block the crime victims fro ,, i lig the information that would prove the violation that has happe n ch a privilege would, among other things, directly conflict with the C tut , command of Congress that crime victims must be "treated with fairne 8 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8),. + +Epsteb that defense attorneys must have assurances that Appt's B at 10. But it is now settled that if defense attorneys want to engage in plea discussions with federal prosecutors, they must now be aware that the prosecutors will, in turn, confer with victims about the plea arrangements. Indeed, the Attorney General has promulgated guidelines requiring such conferences. See with prosecutors will never be turned over to crime victims. + +communi + +U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR VICTIM-WITNESS ASSISTANCE 41 (2012) ("Federal prosecutors should be available to confer with victims about major case decisions, such as . . . plea negotiations . . . ."). And when a criminal defendant works with a prosecutor to violate that congressionallycreated right to confer, the defendant can hardly complain about eff is to reveal what he has done. In short, Epstein cannot correspond with the i tlftrun i ent about how to avoid the requirements of the CVRA and then e t e able to hide 0 behind some nebulous "common law privilege" to e accountability for any resulting violation of law. + +Perhaps recognizing that tenuousn 'Sra ±h iviillege. See Appt's Br. at 40.'5 None of these cases are from the Eleve cuit, which (unlike other jurisdictions) requires a strong showing + +IS Epstein also remarkably alleges that there is a "consensus among the states" in favor of protecting plea discussions. Appt's Br.a t 42 & n.10. But his citations simply show that many states have adopted Fed. IL Evid. 410 essentially verbatim, including the limitations that prevent Epstein from taking advantage of its protections here. If anything, his citations show that there is a consensus among the states not to protect the correspondence at issue here. + +of "compelling" justification before a new privilege can be created. International Horizons, Inc. v. The Committee of Unsecured Creditors, 689 F.2d 996, 1004 (11th Cir.1982) ("compelling" justification required to interfere with the search for truth in federal cases). Moreover, none of the three cases cited involve plea bargaining in criminal cases — presumably because that subject is already direct vered in detail in Rule 410. Finally, these cases involve situations whe 0 i l rt thought it important to create "confidentiality and trust between par ap in a mediation proceeding." See, e.g., Folb v. Motion Picture Ind ion & Health Plans, 16 F.Supp.2d 1164, 1175 (C.D. Cal. 1998) (e ded)). Here, of course, Epstein is not trying to create trust with ie' dv ent, but rather to block third parties to illegal negotiations learn w extended a new privilege in s tion. See, e.g., In re MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337 (7th Cir. 2012) (r (Cti , g request for recognition of new privilege for settlement discussion ing need for confidence and trust alone insufficient reason to c a privilege, and noting that Congress, in enacting Fed. R. Civ. Evid. 4 erring admissibility of statements made during "compromise negotiatio s," did not take additional step of protecting settlement negotiations from discovery). Epstein has not established the "compelling" reason that would be required for such an unprecedented step. The District Court's decision not to do so should be affirmed. ned. No other Court of Appeals has + +## IV. THIS COURT DOES NOT POSSESS JURISDICTION OVER AN INTERLOCUTORY DISCOVERY DISPUTED. + +Not only is Epstein's appeal meritless, but it is also not properly before the Court at this time. Epstein is asking this Court to jump into the middle of a District Court discovery dispute. The Supreme Court in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 130 S. Ct. 599 (2009), cautioned that "the district At j e better exercise [his or her] responsibility to [to police prejudgment litigants] if the appellate courts do not repeatedly intervene to s ess prejudgment rulings." Id. at 605. For all of the reasons ex n the victims' pending Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocuto k\ and Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlo Ih ppeal, this Court should dismiss Epstein's appeal for lack of juris n. + +Because the victims a lly briefed the jurisdictional arguments in connection with their pen motion, they will not repeat their arguments here. The victims wil ho er, point out that there is serious discussion among the federal co peals questioning the continued viability of the Perlman d e wake of Mohawk. The relevant opinions are summarized in United States v. Copar Pumice Co., Inc., 714 F.3d 1197, 1209 n. 5 (10th Cir. 2013) ("A few circuit courts of appeals have discussed the impact of the Mohawk decision on the Perlman doctrine, with varying results."). + +Epstein relies heavily on one of those opinions, United States v. Krane, 625 F.3d 568 (9th Cir. 2010). See Appt's Br. at 50. But the circumstances there hardly match the circumstances here. In that case, a recognized privilege holder sought interlocutory review to bar release of documents protected by the attorney client privilege in connection with a criminal case. The Ninth C I in Krane allowed the appeal, noting that "for all practical purposes, thi I [was] [the privilege holders] only opportunity to seek review of adverse to its claims of attorney-client privilege .. . Here, however, Epstein will have other oppo use of the correspondence, because he ha\ 4 1\ o intervene in other proceedings below. (se court's order t 573 (emphasis added). present a challenge to the + +Indeed, the victims nee t a t the Court that Epstein, a billionaire with a battery of well-paid atto ys, dppears to be embarking on a steady stream of motions to intervene atIeser, with a possible steady stream of interlocutory appeals to this Court trategically delaying any entrance for several years, Epstein has no e separate motions to intervene in the District Court. Epstein first sou t limited intervention not when the case was first filed in 2008, but rather more than three years later; on September 2, 2011, he moved to intervene with regard to correspondence between his attorneys and federal prosecutors (DE 93) — the intervention that has prompted this appeal. In response, the victims + +objected that his efforts were untimely. DE 96. The victims also warned against "subjecting the [District] Court (and the victims) to an endless stream of `limited' intervention motions from Epstein and his attorneys whenever a hearing does not unfold to his liking." DE 96 at 17. Ultimately, the District Court sided with Epstein on this particular motion, allowing his limited intervention at of his attorneys) on issues related to the correspondence. DE 158,159 r, of course, the District Court rejected Epstein's arguments releasing the correspondence to this Court, prompting Epstein's c cy. \*nterlocutory appeal. + +In June of this year, another hearing n a way not to Epstein's liking. On June 18, 2013, the court d e Government's motion to dismiss (DE 189) and a few days later filed another motion for limited" intervention — this one a "pro motion anticipating that the District Court will need to determine wh e non-prosecution agreement in this case can be set aside as a remedytotjte Government's violation of the CVRA. DE 207. The victims res objectio ervention because the issue had not yet been subject to any litigation. DE 212. That motion by Epstein to intervene remains pending before the District Court and is unopposed. E 209, noting that on this particular issue, they had no + +Most recently, on July 26, 2013, Epstein filed a third motion for "limited" intervention regarding grand jury materials that the District Court had ordered the + +Government to produce to the victims. Epstein claimed that his motion was timely because the issue regarding the grand jury materials on recently became ripe. DE 215 at 3. Yet the issue was actually several years old, as the victims have argued in their opposition to the motion (which is pending before the District Court). DE 221. + +Given that Epstein has filed three separate motions to inte — the District Court has granted one of them, one of them is unopposed, and one remains under consideration — it can hardly be said that this appe s somehow Epstein's "only opportunity" for further review of the relev 4 Indeed, unless this Court makes clear that this interlocutory appea s er, it can perhaps look forward to (and subject the District Court to 1\ could disrupt the proceedings sort of danger that Moho ed against. Accordingly, this Court should find that it lacks jurisdicti ill\*this time to consider Epstein's interlocutory appeal of the District 0 C iscovery order regarding the correspondence. • s of future interlocutory appeals that kind of delaying tactic was precisely the + +## CONCLUSION + +Fo 11 these reasons, this Court should find that it lack jurisdiction over this appeal. If this Court reaches the merits of the appeal, it should affirm the decision of the District Court. + +DATED: August 30, 2013 + +Respectfully Submitted, + +![]() + +--- + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. 1400 E. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Telephone: 801-585-5202 +Facsimile: 801-585-6833 +E-Mail: [cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) + +*and* + +Bradley J. [REDACTED] +FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, +[REDACTED], FISTOS & LEHRMAN, +P.L. +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +Telephone (954) 524-2820 +Facsimile (954) 524-2822 +Florida Bar No.: 542075 +E-mail: [brad@pathtojustice.com](mailto:brad@pathtojustice.com) + +*Attorneys for Appellees Jane Doe No. +1 and Jane Doe No. 2* + +## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FED. R. APP. P. 32(A) + +Certificate of Compliance with Type-Volume Limitation, Typeface Requirements, and Type Style Requirements. + +1. This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B) because this brief contains 12,267 words, excluding the, of the AS brief exempted by Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B)(iii). + +2. This brief complies with the typeface requirem 0ed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Fed. R. P. 32(aX6) because this brief has been prepared in a proportionally sp ce using Microsoft Word 2010 in 14 pt Time New Roman type. CS , (SY Respectfully submitted, + +iC)\* a:rt se + +V + +X I ZI.Iir + +( —IN + +\..) + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +The foregoing document was served on August 30, 2013, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: + +Dexter Lee +A. [REDACTED] Villafaña +Assistant U.S. Attorneys +500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 +E-mail: [Dexter.Lee@usdoj.gov](mailto:Dexter.Lee@usdoj.gov) +E-mail: [REDACTED] +Attorneys for the Government + +Roy Black, Esq. +Jackie Perczek, Esq. +Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. +201 South Biscayne Boulevard +Suite 1300 +Miami, FL 33131 +E-mail: [rblack@royblack.com](mailto:rblack@royblack.com) +E-mail: [jperczek@royblack.com](mailto:jperczek@royblack.com) +(305) 37106421 +(305) 358-2006 + +[REDACTED] G. Weinberg +[REDACTED] G. Weinberg, PC +20 PARK PLZ STE 1000 +Boston, MA 02116-4301 +Email: [owlmgw@att.net](mailto:owlmgw@att.net) +(617) 227-3700 + +![]() + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +In Re: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. + +MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION UMENTS FROM TRUSTEE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT PRO PROTOCOL ESTABLISHED BY DE#672 (807); AMEN ION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +st 4, 2010 + +hearic74.4:;SSI6fore the one HONORABLE RAYMOND B. RAY, e above-entitled cause came on for he Judges of the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY CO T, in and for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, at 299 East Broward Blvd., Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, on Tuesday, August 4, 2010, commencing at or about 9:30 a.m., and the following proceedings were had: + +Reported By: Margaret Franzen + +### APPEARANCES: + +BERGER SINGERMAN, by CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE on behalf of the Trustee + +CONRAD & SCHERER, by WILLIAM R. SCHERER, ESQUIRE on behalf of victims + +BURNETT, b RONALD G. NEIWIRTH, ESQ LILLY ANN , ATTO -AT-LAW E. KNIG S4UIRE L. ACKE QUIRE on behalf of J r Epstein + +JAFFE WEISS FISTOS & LEHRMAN, by ER, ESQUIRE DWARDS, ESQUIRE on belt of LM, Brad and Weissing Fistos & Lehrman + +1 2 THE COURT: Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler. All right. May I have appearances, please? + +3 4 MR. LICHTMAN: Good morning, Judge. Chuck Lichtman, Berger Singerman, for the trustee. + +5 6 7 8 partners, Chris Knight and Lilly Ann San MR. NEIWIRTH: Good morning, your Honor. Ronald Neiwirth, Burnett, on beh 1 of Aqt, the movant, Epstein, and with me today are o 1. my + +9 Good morning ou Honor. + +10 MR. KNIGHT: Good morning, our Honor. + +11 12 13 14 MR. NEIWIRTH: -- bo hom are more familiar with the State Co t e on this than I ?\' l sdr am, so they came along le to elucidate that end of it. + +15 MR. FARM Good morning, your Honor. + +16 17 18 19 20 Gary on eh of LM, Brad and the fe Weissing law firm. We are an ( c interest pa ty and have filed a motion for prot 'ye order as to the subpoena that is at iss16.' e today. + +21 22 23 24 THE COURT: All right. Insofar as the TD Bank motion, Docket Entry 780, that has been the subject matter of an agreed order that was submitted to me. + +25 MR. LICHTMAN: Correct, Judge. + +THE COURT: Mr. Scherer. + +MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. + +I'm William Scherer and I'm here on behalf of a number of victims in the State Court action, as well as the chairman of the creditors' committee in the bankruptcy. + +THE COURT: All right. That leav s ith Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Je£frre ` Ep tein's motion. + +MR. NEIWIRTH: Thank your Honor, and again, good morning. We repre ffrey Epstein. He has a civil claim pendin ntt ate Court in Palm Beach County. He c ASyi n , ed a subpoena on Mr. Stettin requesti do nts from the RRA estate. That was back in 1. + +While was still in process, in May, under ket Entry 672, your Honor entered an order tan ardizing procedures for obtaining disco om Mr. Stettin and the RRA estate, an ast on the face of it, it takes jur diction over all discovery efforts against the trustee. That left us in a quandary. + +We had a subpoena pending in State Court. We had correspondence from Berger Singerman on behalf of the trustee that they had 1 identified information and they were processing 2 it, including vetting for attorney/client 3 privilege issues, but then in the meantime came 4 your Honor's order on May 18th, so we had to go 5 back and reinvent the wheel and go through the 6 necessary hoops in order to comply with that. + +7 In the meantime, as we sit here, e 8 still have no production. We have a t ate 9 coming up in October, and we have a on for 10 protective order coming from a p who's 11 already settled out, the LM p They no 12 longer have anything direr do with this. + +13 Further, we ised by the 14 creditors' committe ha in 15 proffered to us, t some point in time there 16 had been somet ike ten boxes of records 17 pertaining 18 on beha of he victims had been given, or 19 seve s eones, had been given access to those 20 ten s and had viewed them, which would 21 to any attorney/client privilege in any 22 event. addition to what was these particular issues and someone + +23 So what we are trying to do is fashion 24 a mechanism so we can comply with your order, 25 Docket 672, about standardized means of getting + +1 production from the trustee, allow for the 2 appropriate vetting of the materials for 3 attorney/client privilege, and we must bear in 4 mind that this is one objector, there's a lot 5 more documents than that. + +6 To the best of our knowledge, the 7 documents that pertain to the LM party, w is 8 settled anyway, may be 15 percent of t ich 9 are responsive to the inquiry that wA malde of the 10 trustee, but in any event, someo as to vet 11 them for attorney/client priv and do a 12 privilege log. + +13 Now, Mr. Farpe4. 1r fric e on behalf of 14 LM wants to do that. We on't think that's 15 appropriate. We the privilege at this 16 point, since t e is settled, lies with RRA 17 and, theref e the trustee, rather than 18 Mr. Fauler his client, because as to them the 19 caseer. + +20 Furthermore, we don't think there is 21 an rivilege because the boxes have been vetted 22 before and we'll hear more about that from 23 Mr. Scherer, I assume, because he was the one 24 that was aware of that. + +25 And last, but not least, your Honor has + +1 + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +taken jurisdiction over these discovery matters and attempted to standardize discovery efforts for the trustee. There's a lot of people that want things from the trustee. + +The trustee is overseeing an estate L;r which involved somewhere in excess of 70 lawye s and lots of cases and lots of problems, an literally millions of documents, and we absolutely no problem with the stands iz d order, but that means that someho o other we have to be able to deal with i standardized aid instead of Mr. Farm ggestion, which is go back to State Cour 1140 there. eal with it over + +at is the status of the State Court proceedin + +M NEIWIRTH: May I defer to my partner, miliar with that? who is m + +KNIGHT: Your Honor, Kni 0. f I may? While we were waiting for the doc ents from the Stettin office, we obviously wanted to go down two tracks because we had an October trial date. The status of it is we could not come to an agreement with the other side. Mr. Ackerman was at the last hearing, in which the + +1 2 3 judge said, one, I need a representative of the trustee here and two, shouldn't this be back before you, Judge Ray. + +4 5 THE COURT: You can't proceed against Rothstein in the State Court, they're here. + +6 7 8 MR. KNIGHT: And that is the same th'n think Judge recognized, and that's why ' back here, and that's why we had to file otion. + +9 10 11 12 MR. ACKERMAN: The claim aga'ns Rothstein is against him individu and it's against Brad individua d it was against one of the claimant ndividually. + +13 14 THE COURT: So 144 " ot against the debtor estate. + +15 MR. ACK That's correct. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 MR. K IGH 7. Just to go a little further on what Mr. Nei rth was saying. Out of these documents we've be as ing for for a long time, very few of them ?ce ven have privilege on their face because the nothing to do with the clients that were rep sented, what's been called as LM. + +22 23 24 25 If there's going to be a log, if there's any need, which I don't think there is because I think privilege has been waived, it needs to be a log put together by the trustee, 1 2 not anybody else that has some sort of interest in it. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 If there's a problem with payment for those, et cetera, our client has already offered to the trustee, to Mr. Lichtman, we will pay for it, whether it's a special or whether t's iq a contract attorney, if they need to do tD t I don't think we even need to reach the + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I think these documents ark 1 ng overdue. They have been produce others, they have been used in depositions thers, they are out there, and I thin ( rivilege issue is just being used as a s s reen to keep our client from being ab S t s"get the documents he rS needs to be able o ve his case. + +16 Than + +17 18 19 20 M ACKERMAN: Your Honor, one other mattertklud It ir expressed a concern about ente ' Ilhy order against the trustee or his cou without them being present. + +21 22 23 24 25 Initially we had filed a motion to compel in the State Court, but we didn't realize at the time or it was unclear, because we had just taken over the case from another law firm, that the Court had entered its order. + +1 2 3 4 5 6 There was some discussion prior to the hearing and when we went to the hearing, it was clear that there was no agreement that had existed and Judge said, I'm not entering an order, I'm not doing anything on this motion until the bankruptcy trustee is represented. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 for documents from the trustee we're here now. He was concerned because this Cou order had set up the standardized proced dealing with these arguments and had ii,:: seved jurisdiction relating to any subp or request at's why + +13 THE COURT: Al0 44 , + +14 15 16 17 18 19 MR. KNIGHT: You Honor, just one other point. We tried o , and we've been working with Mr. Lichtman, t ied Lo work out a protective order between the ustee and Epstein regarding the subpoena Mr Lichtman and agreed to lang o it. I have a copy of it. S' + +20 21 22 23 24 0 .I:h. Mr. , with his motion for pretpective order, would not agree to that, but if the Court would like to have a copy of what the draft was, I will approach your clerk, but if you do not want that, I also --- + +25 THE COURT: Well, let me hear from 1 everybody first. + +2 MR. KNIGHT: Okay. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 MR. : Thank you, your Honor, may it please the Court. Again, Gary on behalf of the interested party, LM, also on behalf of Brad and I'm sorry, your Honor, Mr. Ed a ds is here with me. I neglected to introduce t the Court earlier. + +9 (::) MR. : Good morning, ou Honor. + +10 11 12 13 14 15 MR. : There has a lot of discussion here about your Hono r andardized At production order and I thin 'you need to understand that this parA matter, which is A before you today, is th g but standard or common to the matters bef6rs is Court. + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 You n understand the nature of the case. convicte pe phile. He sexually assaulted doze ozens of young girls under the age of 15. led guilty to this and he has settled eve civil lawsuit filed against him on this issue. frey Epstein is an admitted + +23 24 25 Despite all of this, Mr. Epstein has seen fit to file a lawsuit against LM, who is one of the plaintiffs against him; against + +1 2 Brad , LM's attorney; and against Mr. Rothstein. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Now, , myself, and all the members of our firm were RRA attorneys when Mr. Rothstein took his ill-fated trip to Morocco and did the things which are now so well kno but the fact of the matter is that this d request is a blatant attempt to obtain privileged documents related to the (.. ) representation of LM and many of-a victims, by the way. + +12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Agyo, And if I can shoo Honor a copy of the subpoena itself, I 10\$t think that the cc breadth of the subpo a h srbeen adequately represented to t o t. If you peruse this, you will see tty~ e asking for communications with privat nvestigators, they're asking for conting y e contracts, they're asking for ever nication between any member of the fir d they throw Rothstein in just to make it se about these cases. + +22 23 24 25 Now, your Honor, clearly communication about the representation of a client falls under not only the work product, but if the client is involved in the communication, also the + +1 attorney/client privilege. + +2 3 4 5 Now, most of this stuff we've already responded and said none, none, none, but for many of these items, we have asserted the privilege and we continue to assert the privilege. + +6 7 Now, the only reason the trustee is here --- A + +8 9 THE COURT: Wait, there's been Si ilege asserted in the State Court proceedin + +10 MR. : Yes, sir. + +11 12 THE COURT: And the r privilege log and the judge has made a ru + +13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 MR. : N 6it , dispute over who's going to ' e ISt'e privilege log and respectfully, Jud ' w 11.1.1t we suggest is that the trustee has bee th st into this matter simply because the ustee i\* former a orl ys at RRA, and the trustee is likewise boun t ie privileges that attach to the cases and AS s to wyers that were at the firm. now really is stands in the shoes of all the + +21 22 23 24 25 The trustee has repeatedly acknowledged the fact that it is bound by those privileges and, of course, as your Honor knows, the privilege belongs to the client, not to any lawyer or any law firm. + +AllAr + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 So the trustee is really kind of stuck in the middle here. You've got the pedophile who wants documents related to the cases he's already settled and pled guilty for. Those documents, the electronic documents, at least, the e-mails, electronically stored information is how it' 4C' referred to in the discovery request, you t on r, are not in our possession, they are in possession of the trustee because th ustee took the computer system. + +11 12 13 14 15 16 So the trustee does nt to incur the cost and expense of f a. privilege log and, frankly, I don't at the trustee has a full appreciation o he ature and specific facts of the cas conduct a comp to privilege log. would enable it to + +17 18 19 20 21 22 S suggestion, your Honor, and it's A been re' cte I believe it's acceptable to the trus ` ut it's been rejected by Mr. Epstein's cou is the trustee be removed from this equ ion. There's no need that we come back before you. + +23 24 25 This case, this Epstein case, is not a matter which would involve bankruptcy estate assets going to Mr. Epstein. Unlike + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mr. Scherer's clients, who have claims before this Court, and hopefully they will get some form of relief from the Bankruptcy Court, Epstein is not seeking any bankruptcy assets. He's suing Brad and LM personally, and Scott Rothstein, and it's not an estate claim, it' against Scott Rothstein personally. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So my suggestion, your Honor you instruct the trustee to turn thi ectronic documentation information over t file the appropriate privile with the Circuit Court judge who is ding over the case, who is most fami ' th the case, who will be considering e coming motion for < lo ;. summary judgment, ossibly trying the case, and that way y r nor is not burdened with this matter, the ustee does not incur fees and expense t"' -Ic sus, wing to go through all of these rj docu , prepare a privilege log and our cli and Mr. -- Mr. is also a pa y of that lawsuit. He enjoys his own privilege, your Honor, over and above, or in addition to, I should say, the privilege possessed by our former clients and, of course, I know counsel knows that the privilege extends We will + +1 beyond the litigation. + +2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 So although Mr. Epstein paid a ton of money for this claim that is supposedly frivolous, it has been settled, but the privilege still extends and it remains in place. So we simply want to make sure that our investigativ materials, our reports, other documentation relating to the claims we have and have (4 against Jeffrey Epstein are not put in 3o h nands of Jeffrey Epstein's attorn + +11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Now, we just want th A At these documents and prepare ivilege log and A c the trustee is kind of s llSsdr Judge. Remove the t tee rom the equation, let us get the docume s 11 file the privilege log, and then M tein and us can go before Judge e can review the privilege log, review t do uments in camera. e to review the middle here, + +19 20 21 22 ( ic k 11 that is going to be pretty time con but he's much more suited, a better sui d judge because he's more familiar with the facts to engage in that inquiry. + +23 THE COURT: Thank you. + +24 MR. : Thank you, your Honor. + +25 THE COURT: Mr. Lichtman, Mr. Scherer, your 1 Input, please. + +2 3 MR. LICHTMAN: I'm going to let Mr. Scherer go first. + +4 5 MR. SCHERER: I think he wants me to go first. + +6 THE COURT: All right. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MR. SCHERER: Your Honor, in Nove we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we ed that as a part of Mr. Rothstein and the filrm, and the firm's employees, and maybe s. f the firm's attorneys, conspired to y. e Epstein/LM A litigation in order to lure million worth Nk Ve of my victims, my client , investments in these one settlements. making + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 And as 1 ged in that State Court proceeding, and sharpened the allegations as we've am sometime 'n 1 te October, that my clients were So invi 'n the Rothstein firm with Mr. tein, and he explained that he had a lit ation going in State Court with Mr. representing LM, a victim of Mr. Epstein, and these are kind of sensational allegations and 4 t's been printed widely. ed a few times, we allege that + +25 And my clients, a number of them and + +ALAr + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 their lawyer, went into the Rothstein conference room and Mr. Rothstein brought down -- summoned the investigators, two of them, two or three of them, to bring down the Epstein file. And the lawyer that my clients brought from a national firm, went through the LM boxes, ten of the the investigators brought down, and concl that the Epstein case was a real case. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 And what Mr. Rothstein did(witlh that real case, of course, is he tol not only did he have the LM c Mr. , that there w young ladies, that was ' ASsrI published in the ( S 0 newspaper, that the Arm as representing and rybody that f umber of other that wanted to s confidential b ith Mr. Epstein on a + +17 18 19 20 21 22 23 S e used the real case in order to defraud c ents into investing into these phon ece lements and paid 13 and a half million do I believe that Mr. Rothstein and others in e firm also told that story to a lot of other people, and let a lot of other people examine those ten boxes of the real case. + +24 25 In addition, as we have alleged, that Mr. and the firm put sensational + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 allegations in the LM case that they knew were not true, in order to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman and other personages, I can't remember who they are, and all sorts of other allegations that really w not even related to the LM case. + +8 9 10 11 12 13 14 And to the extent that any 1 from the RRA firm, former lawyers, made a to of money or however Mr. talked abo t, we're interested in that ton of mo ause if they were involved in this sch is fraud, there's 2<; a crime fraud exceptio AS, to see the ten boxes ha rthey brought down. in addition, I want + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The tr oes not have those ten boxes. Those xes were taken by Mr. when he lef the law firm, I presume. So we want the ten xe we want all the communications and fr we w t look through everything on behalf of my t TZ) Court case, but also on behalf of the cre itors' committee because the creditors' committee is looking to see if anybody else in the firm, other than Rothstein, was involved in this massive fraud that used the Epstein case. + +25 + +The model of using an existing case and + +1 2 3 4 then spinning off a fraud from it is the same that was perpetrated on the Morse -- in the Morse situation, as has been alleged and widely produced. + +5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I can't conceive that Mr. and the predecessor law firm would have any stag to prepare privilege logs or anything els i en what I just told the Court. That woul ike having the fox guard the hen house. Th t Epstein AV case is settled, and to the exte t's the ten A(ItY boxes of stuff that we looke gh, and I'll 4s have to get the boxes to s i s" the attorney who 'Sr looked through them, a Atw much time he spent looking through the + +15 THE COU here are the ten boxes? + +16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MR. HE That's a good question. The trustee oes not have the ten boxes. I presume e 'I ..: 7 n - boxes are residing with the lawy ?1 23 the expense of which will be borne by the Epstein 24 movants. The special will meet with both 25 sides, Epstein and , and then with the + +1 2 3 trustee, and will prepare a privilege log, the release of which will be noticed for hearing in front of me. + +4 5 or do you? MR. LICHTMAN: Do I pick the special + +6 7 8 9 THE COURT: You can -- if you all ca hate to use the word agree, but if you all that's fine. If you can't agree, give (:m to choose from. ) ee, names + +10 MR. LICHTMAN: Okay. + +11 12 13 THE COURT: You're g have to check with this, quote, "special to make sure they have the time to review 1 44,p, vilege log. + +14 MR. LICHT e documents. + +15 16 THE COU d it has to be somebody that ct of interest. doesn't have a + +17 M LICHTMAN: Right. Okay. + +18 19 THE COURT: All right. Run the order by Mr. 'r h and Mr. + +20 MR. LICHTMAN: Thank you. + +21 MR. : Thank you, your Honor. + +22 23 MR. NEIWIRTH: Your Honor, may it please the Court? + +24 THE COURT: Yes. + +25 MR. NEIWIRTH: Can we say something about 1 2 the time frame because as we sit here right now we still have a trial coming in October. + +3 4 5 6 7 THE COURT: Well, I understand that, but I probably have between five and 6,000 active cases right now and within the Rothstein case, I don't even know how many adversaries and contested matter re pending. I'll get to it as soon as I can. + +8 9 10 11 12 But you can proceed to obtain information from and LM in the St to Court proceeding. All I'm govern s what the trustee is going to release fr debtor estate. + +13 14 order. All right. Mr A S : v: man, see to the ( S' + +15 MR. EDW 4(tD \*) if : Thank you, your Honor. + +16 17 Honor. MR. F E . Thank you for your time, your + +18 R. SitIr M EIWIRTH: Thank you, Judge. N + +19 Thereupon, the hearing was concluded.) + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +## CERTIFICATION + +STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF DADE: + +A 49 I, Margaret Franzen, Shorth eporter and Notary Public in and for the S o ''Florida at Large, do hereby certify that foregoing proceedings were taken before at the date and place as stated in the ca ereto on Page 1; that the foregoing compu a ed transcription is a true record of my ste is notes taken at said proceedings. + +WIT hand day of August, 2010. this 5th + +Margaret Franzen + +Court Reporter and Notary Public and for the State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: April 14, 2014 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a01dc3377d4a94d51bbc0e6749d432db4ed276f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726/EFTA02767726.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,5931 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767726.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 119, + "chars": 181220, + "elapsed_seconds": 30.39, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFIWY STEIN'S \nNOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN guyircirr OF HIS SUPPLEMENT \nTO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE WEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED \nNATURE OF DOCUMENTS. ETC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.8692016601562, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 529.8692016601562, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 82.00800000000001, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit B, at 35-36.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SER(IK\\ST \"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 403.863037109375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 403.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Synopsis", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 93.80089569091797, + 329.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 329.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[1] Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 174.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 174.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[2] Federal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 411.876, + 275.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 411.876, + 289.3305969238281 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 289.3305969238281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 405.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 405.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "141 Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 534.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 534.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[5] Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 635.85 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 649.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 649.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(61 Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 328.86 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 343.33056640625 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 343.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "171 Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 500.070556640625 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 500.070556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[8( Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 601.02 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 601.02 + ], + [ + 154.19744873046875, + 615.5705718994141 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 615.5705718994141 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "191 Federal Courts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 414.82745361328125, + 75.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 75.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 244.61999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MI Criminal Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.4378356933594, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 410.4378356933594, + 430.33056640625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 430.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1121 Federal Civil Procedure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 190.0577392578125, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 190.0577392578125, + 75.4541015625 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 75.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1131 Federal Civil Procedure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 190.44161987304688, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 190.44161987304688, + 315.0840759277344 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 315.0840759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1141 Privileged Communications and \nConfidentiality", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 222.84886169433594, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 222.84886169433594, + 429.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 429.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Attorneys and Law Firms", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 424.06488037109375, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 424.06488037109375, + 215.714111328125 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 215.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1151 Privileged Communications and \nConfidentiality", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 55.692, + 655.29 + ], + [ + 223.23861694335938, + 655.29 + ], + [ + 223.23861694335938, + 683.3340835571289 + ], + [ + 55.692, + 683.3340835571289 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opinion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 351.9698181152344, + 540.27 + ], + [ + 351.9698181152344, + 553.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 553.9540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 220.7597198486328, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 220.7597198486328, + 278.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 278.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. STANDARDS OF REVIEW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 364.14, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 507.96160888671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 507.96160888671875, + 85.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 364.14, + 85.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "M. DISCUSSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 391.68, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 480.8599853515625, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 480.8599853515625, + 349.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 391.68, + 349.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. We Have Jurisdiction To \nDecide This Interlocutory Appeal.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 362.916, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 509.36083984375, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 509.36083984375, + 503.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 362.916, + 503.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Intervenors' Correspondence Is Not Privileged.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 551.0140991210938, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 551.0140991210938, + 126.95062255859375 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 126.95062255859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Federal Rt11e of Uvidence 410 Provides \nNo_PiSJegelor Plea Negotiations.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 344.556, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 526.9396362304688, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 526.9396362304688, + 308.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 308.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. The Intervenors Waived Any Work-Product Privilege.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 299.0301208496094, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 299.0301208496094, + 85.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 85.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. We Decline To Recognize a Common-\nLaw Privilege for Plea Negotiations.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 623.7 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 651.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 83.23200000000001, + 651.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Footnotes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 101.716796875, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 101.716796875, + 344.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 50.79600000000001, + 344.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 483.4949645996094, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 483.4949645996094, + 195.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 195.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AU Citations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.508, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 371.71337890625, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 371.71337890625, + 284.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 311.508, + 284.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In the \nUnited States Court of Appeals \nfor the \nDistrict of Eleventh Circuit \nJane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, A''.--N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.0966491699219, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 505.0966491699219, + 247.2208251953125 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 247.2208251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO.2'S APPELLEE BRIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 503.38226318359375, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 503.38226318359375, + 422.3809509277344 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 422.3809509277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Appeal from the \nUnited States District Court for the \nSouthern District of Florida", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 415.52313232421875, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 415.52313232421875, + 483.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 197.06400000000002, + 483.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 451.26251220703125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 451.26251220703125, + 88.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 88.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 380.7875061035156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 380.7875061035156, + 88.491455078125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 88.491455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 384.93560791015625, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 384.93560791015625, + 120.88092041015625 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 120.88092041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Contents", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 133.34169006347656, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 133.34169006347656, + 189.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 189.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.26, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 395.4481201171875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 395.4481201171875, + 88.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 217.26, + 88.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 121.27555847167969, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 121.27555847167969, + 116.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 116.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATUTES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 149.81320190429688, + 468.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 149.81320190429688, + 487.2509460449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 487.2509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OTHER ACOIITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 231.4642333984375, + 535.41 + ], + [ + 231.4642333984375, + 553.2509460449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 553.2509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 122.81285858154297, + 649.6200000000001 + ], + [ + 122.81285858154297, + 668.0009384155273 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 668.0009384155273 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.9407958984375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.9407958984375, + 88.75042724609375 + ], + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 88.75042724609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND STATEMENT OF FA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 213.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 213.63043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Epstein Investigatio SI .,the Non-Prosecution Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 513.71240234375, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 513.71240234375, + 406.75042724609375 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 406.75042724609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Procedural History Surrounding the Victims' CVRA Petition", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.952, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 492.49517822265625, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 492.49517822265625, + 636.6304168701172 + ], + [ + 119.952, + 636.6304168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Procedural History Regarding Releasing the Correspondence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.3108825683594, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.3108825683594, + 185.38092041015625 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 185.38092041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STANDARD OF REVIEW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 390.10565185546875, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 390.10565185546875, + 636.1209411621094 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 636.1209411621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.228, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 417.1761474609375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 417.1761474609375, + 88.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 195.228, + 88.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 351.14501953125, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 351.14501953125, + 313.4914855957031 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 313.4914855957031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. EPSTEIN HAS FAIL 4EVELOP AN EVIDENTIARY \nRECORD IN THE CT COURT THAT HE HAS ANY \nINTEREST CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE \nCORRESPO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 392.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.552490234375, + 392.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.552490234375, + 458.7509460449219 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 458.7509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWE THE \nGOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN IS NOT CTED \nFROM DISCOVERY BY FEDERAL R ENCE \n410 OR BY THE WORK PRODUCT DOC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.5315551757812, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.5315551757812, + 298.2509765625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 298.2509765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. RULE NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE BECAUSE \nTHE SCUSSIONS LEAD TO A GUILTY PLEA.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 527.944580078125, + 437.40000000000003 + ], + [ + 527.944580078125, + 471.1209411621094 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 471.1209411621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rule 410. Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 436.968, + 249.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 249.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. THE DISTRICT COURT'S FACTUAL FINDING THAT \nSIGNIFICANT PARTS OF THE CORRESPONDENCE \nCONCERNED SUBJECTS OTHER THAN PLEA \nNEGOTIATIONS IS NOT CLEARLY ERRONEOUS.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 513.7454833984375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 513.7454833984375, + 136.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 136.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. RULE 410 DOES NOT APPLY HERE BECAUSE THE \nVICTIMS CAN USE THE CORRESPONDENCE AGAINST \nTHE GOVERNMENT.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.504638671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.504638671875, + 120.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 120.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. RULE 410 DOES N tR\\ISCOVERY el OF THE \nCORRESPONDX .", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 490.5260009765625, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 490.5260009765625, + 394.2509460449219 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 394.2509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE DOES NOT APPLY \nTO CORRESPONDENCE WITH AN ADVERSARY.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 524.6405639648438, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 524.6405639648438, + 104.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 104.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ill. THE DISTRICT COURT PROPERLY CONCLUDED THAT \nCORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT \nAND EPSTEIN IS NOT PROTECTED FROM DISciaVERY \nBY SOME KIND OF \"COMMON LA PLEA \nBARGAINING PRIVILEGE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 523.1029663085938, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 523.1029663085938, + 249.88092041015625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 249.88092041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. URTS CANNOT CREATE A \"COMMON LAW\" \nes\niP EGE THAT OVERULES THE LIMITATIONS OF \nRULE 410 AND THE STATUTORY COMMANDS OF THE \nCRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 535.5260009765625, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 535.5260009765625, + 556.9499969482422 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 556.9499969482422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. THIS COURT DOES NOT POSSESS JURISDICTION \nOVER AN INTERLOCUTORY DISCOVERY DISPUTED.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.200927734375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.200927734375, + 104.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 104.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 356.74176025390625, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 356.74176025390625, + 571.6209411621094 + ], + [ + 254.59199999999998, + 571.6209411621094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FED. R. APP. P. 32(A)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.2408447265625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.2408447265625, + 88.62091064453125 + ], + [ + 102.20400000000001, + 88.62091064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 399.6360000000001, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 209.91600000000003, + 87.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 372.65374755859375, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 372.65374755859375, + 85.85107421875 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 85.85107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 371.9982604980469, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 371.9982604980469, + 132.7210693359375 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 132.7210693359375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 79 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 207 + ], + [ + "Line", + 103 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 197 + ], + [ + "Line", + 99 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 196 + ], + [ + "Line", + 98 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 248 + ], + [ + "Line", + 109 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 94 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 190 + ], + [ + "Line", + 94 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 13 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767726" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c94dcc015d59fc3db421500a4bf1a666b3733953 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XVOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. Cos + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT aFPQEY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE ABOUT TRIAL + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Eps to the Court's oral rulings at the May 23, 2018, hearing, on Counter-Plain • Motion to Permit J. to Take the Limited Deposi • f Je y Epstein (Tr. 19:19-20:2), hereby provides notice to the Court and parties Epstein does not plan to testify at Counter-Plaintiff malicious p on trial. In light of the foregoing, and in accordance with the Court's ruling, Epst not plan to answer questions at his deposition about which materials he plaopCise to testify at trial. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax ac + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scott®Iin Primary: Karaalin ock9w.com Secondary: Ti I inkrocklaw.com Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B 2139 Palm Beach Lakes ard West Palm Beach. 09 me earc law isxOsearcv14w.com dvitaleasetvlaw.com scarolateam(asearcvlaw.com terrytdStn(thsearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff Shipley, P.A. + +JeStc n Trial r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt(4FLAmpellateLaw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff' J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +2063711 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b466925dcc3afd0b74296fdfa7f9a21a7f2730a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845/EFTA02767845.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767845.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4663, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT aFPQEY EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE ABOUT TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.3323974609375, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 415.53 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767845" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09dd92828c78ec032a9dae3786c6dfc20ff4946a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTErN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +04 + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF UMC HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has cancelled the hearing for the following: + +DATE: August 15, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Donald flafele + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10-D + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE CANCELLED: + +Motion for Clarification of Trial Order + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of August, 2018. + +![]()**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com; kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904) 680-1234 +Fax: (904) 680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801) 585-5202 +Fax: (801) 581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of UMC Hearing + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 727-3600 +Fax: (561) 727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33eda9e2b951d9d8e9149c5136f4b1ecfcc22894 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848/EFTA02767848.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767848.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2588, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF UMC HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 446.5651550292969, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 446.5651550292969, + 356.60302734375 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 356.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE CANCELLED:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.216, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 314.3033142089844, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 314.3033142089844, + 572.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 72.216, + 572.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767848" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a208153e56fa7174805e38e9c66873f655de48a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOC.MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR CI 9'IONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER, '7 + +J MI, by and through dVjped counsel, hereby gives notice of his withdrawal of the previously-filed Motioy fp S cions for Violation of Court Order, dated April 3, 2018. + +mainder of page intentionally left blank] + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of August, 2018. + +JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169 + +KAREN E. TERRY Florida Bar No.: 45780 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: 'sxrib a om, and mmccann®searcylaw. Primary E-Mail: \_scarobt n searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 At ys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5848f1425775f356874d9726fd39fa0e58ceddbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852/EFTA02767852.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767852.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2334, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.39, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 123.93 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767852" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bd0683ab580d03b91905bac0ae42d5b7b6abb25 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT J NOTICE OF WITHD TION F VIOLATION OF CON E7 EPSTEIN'S MONS PURSUANT TO GREEMENT AGAINST SEL + +Plaintifl7Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey pstein"), hereby gives notice that he is withdrawing his October 5, 2017, M for Sgnctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential Settlement Agreement Against His Counsel [D.E. 1009]. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax mk , + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kam Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: tt Primary: K.raelin kl.w.com Secondary: cklaw.com Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +T JeJack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +2078885 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..507db7dc3a07e5d13b93ed584bcb73832ada07cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855/EFTA02767855.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767855.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4015, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERiCIK\\ST \"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 403.863037109375 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 403.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767855" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da48ebeef0c0e71feac09797ca8acb3675b85846 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Fir I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiWCounter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +C O v + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ADDRESS SCHEDULING AND PRO ALISM + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey s pstein"), hereby gives notice that he is withdrawing his March 29, 2018, Motion cheduling and Professionalism [D.E. 1309]. + +## ERVI E + +I certify that the foregding d. ment has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administratioitillt5(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott(alinlcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina©Iinknocklaw.com Secondary: TrovOlinkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsx@searcylaw.com ns a LA ellateLaw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com k t FLA > eIlateLaw.c searolateameseareylaw.com Co-Counsel or Dee nter-Plaintiff terryteam@searcylaw.com J. Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb©FLAppellateLaw.com + +J. J. N Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@epllc.com Co-CounseeStndant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 F &able, FL 33301 a nuriklaw.com u el for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P. AS ...r, 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldberger(aagwpa.com lv l smahonevaaawna.com and Jane Doe Co-Counsel for Plainti r-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein , + +Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 casselloQlaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. + +::.) + +Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 iavhowell.com Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. and Jane Doe \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..006d4b740b5be2a16958b9a1117e15dcc0e12e8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858/EFTA02767858.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767858.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2530, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S \nNOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ADDRESS \nSCHEDULING AND PRO ALISM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 471.35260009765625, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERVI E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 387.3888854980469, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 387.3888854980469, + 437.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 437.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 351.515380859375, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767858" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..907230197b4b0ee8ce09723c7df6f3467e492d1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. Individually, J. and L.M., Individually Individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION DISCOVERY REOUESTS + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +4 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je pst1, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Florid: vil Procedure, files this Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Certain Discov s. The grounds for this motion are as follows: + +- 1. On Septeni t iv16, 2010, the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, served by facsimile e folio ing discovery requests on counsel for Epstein: uest to Produce; pert Interrogatories and Request to Produce; neral Interrogatories; + - 4. Request for Admission with an Interrogatory. + - 2. The deadline for the responses to the discovery requests is October 18, 2010. +- 3. Initially, Mr. submitted interrogatories in excess of the permissive number. The parties agreed to allow an excess number of interrogatories and the court entered an agreed order expanding the number of interrogatories on October 5, 2010. + +- 4. The number of interrogatories for which seeks a response is approximately 68 interrogatories. +- 5. For most of the thirty (30) day period that Epstein has had to respond to these interrogatories, Epstein has been out of the state. +- 6. Epstein has also objected to the number of requests for admission use among other reasons, the number, including subparts, exceeds the limit of thirty (3 act vided by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. +- 7. Epstein requests an extension of fourteen (14) da Cw' erlthin which to serve responses to the discovery for which no objection has been o +- 8. Undersigned counsel certifies that this r ade in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. The undersigned counsel furth c es that he has and will continue to make an effort to resolve this matter without the ne he ring. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff/ efendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court grant an extensio o fo n (14) days; i.e. up to an including November 1, 2010 in which to serve a response to thealScovery requests to which no objection has been lodged. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HERESY TIFY that a t4 and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via El Email, El Facsimile, utfu.s. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this i relay ofecto\_ber, 2010 to: + +Jack Scaraa, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Jo • h . Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +P.A. + +901 Poin + +777 South Flagl + +West Palm orida 33401 + +Telepho 802-9044 + +Facsi 802-9976 + +for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ -defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6bd0c1bd89aefbc855d1970e9e6ac65560158b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860/EFTA02767860.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767860.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3120, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.426, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 140.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 314.426, + 140.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 381.3902587890625, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 381.3902587890625, + 515.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 515.6080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767860" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92a5f8d2e1b5cf3e5dffc1ec9572fb0764d01b6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.md @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO. 502009CA0408002OOO(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +cos + +## ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PERMIT 11.1.41.1.1"O TAKE THE LIMITED DEPOSITION O + +J. THIS CAUSE having come before the Court for hearing on May 23, 2018, upon ) Motion to PermitBradlay J. to Take the Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, and the Court, having revi9tied the file, considered the arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED as stated on the record and summarized as follows: + +may talce the limited deposition of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") regarding Epstein's possession of Edwards' alleged privileged materials originating from the disc that is the subject of the Banlatptcy proceeding (the "alleged privileged materials"), some of which were identified by Epstein as exhibits on his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. The Court recognizes that no judge has made a determination that the exhibits are, in fact, privileged and that Epstein has requested an in camera inspection of them. (5/23/18 Tr. 13:9-23.) Epstein's deposition shall be limited to the following topics: + +- 1. Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of the alleged privileged materials prior to March 2018 (5/23/18 Tr. 19:7-12); +- 2. Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of the alleged privileged materials after March 2018 (5/23/18 Tr. 19:7-12); +- 3. Whether Epstein has any knowledge regarding compliance with the Court's verbal rulings on • at the March 8, 2018, hearin rdtirdestruction of those documents has claimed are privilegedt5 Tr. 19:13-18); +- 4. Whether and to what extent Epstein materials with anyone other than +- 5. Which, if any, of the allege e any of the alleged privileged s (5/23/18 Tr. 19:19-22); and materials Epstein plans to use to testify at trial. Epstein may avoid\itips on this topic if there is a stipulation on the record + +that hejs not testifying at trial (5/23/18 Tr. 19:22-20:2). rf a astrnektria a . Ar Sir>16.614re;% eta 40, 41)1 4).7/ At41 itrfiet C. 47" 4"/Lafiegn 4-4.g. Epstein's deposition all be conducted in this matter on the same date his deposition is + +conducted in the ba p cyyproceeding. bankruptcy \_prove then, zdiatel following, will be conducted in a likC (1) FiCe Vie &AS.: Epstein's deposition shall first be conducted in the matter, AOC 4 ,0 / CA1b7. + +Epstein's counsel may assert objections, as appropriate, including, but no limited to, + +attorney-client privilege, work product and Fifth Amendment objections. Epstein's answering of any question, however, will not be raised or relied upon in this matter or any other by or any Intervenors, or any other person or entity, nor will it be construed by this Court, or any other court, as a waiver of Epstein's attorney-client privilege, work product protections or Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Article I, + +Order Granting I [REDACTED] J. I [REDACTED] Motion to Take Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein +Epstein v. Rothstein, I [REDACTED] and L.M. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Sections 2, 9 and 16 of the Florida Constitution, whether in this or any other proceeding, with respect to any question asked of him or to any subject matter relating to any answers Epstein may provide at this deposition. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 15 +day of Aug., 2018. + +![]()Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack Scarola +jsx@searcylaw.com + +Karen E. Terry +ket@searcylaw.com + +David P. Vitale Jr. + +dvitale@searcylaw.com; + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Order Granting [REDACTED] v. J. [REDACTED]'s Motion to Take Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein +Epstein v. Rothstein, [REDACTED]'s and L.M. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] v. J. [REDACTED]'s, Esquire +[REDACTED]'s Pottinger LLC +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] v. J. [REDACTED]'s + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +Philip M. Burlington +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 721-0400 +Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] v. J. [REDACTED] + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +Rachel J. Glasser, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 847-4408 +Fax: (561) 855-2891 +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Order Granting [REDACTED] v. J. [REDACTED]'s Motion to Take Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein +Epstein v. Rothstein, [REDACTED] and L.M. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Paul Cassell, Esquire +383 S. University +Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 +cassellp@law.utah.edu +Attorneys for Limited Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe + +Jay Howell, Esquire +Jay Howell & Associates +644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Attorneys for Limited Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..474bdd0bcdd8480489bb012adfb85983bf35183e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863/EFTA02767863.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767863.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6189, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PERMIT 11.1.41.1.1\"O TAKE THE \nLIMITED DEPOSITION O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 517.4918212890625, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 517.4918212890625, + 376.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 74.66399999999999, + 376.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 337.21200000000005, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 337.21200000000005, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 454.4100000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767863" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e80fb20f3e2fe06df18a4933017331a0bd14bcf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXM13AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. ,individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF VIDEO D N DUCES TECUM + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersign s cancel the Video Deposition + +Duces Tecum of: + +### NAME AND ADDRESS + +Jeffrey Epstein 018 at + +# LOCATION + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY and correct c the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the c ttac this Ili I + +> OLA A E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and @searcylaw.com No.: 169440 E-Mail \_scarolateam©searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-31111 Attomeys for + +cc: Palm Beach Reporting (Court Reporter) Above & Beyond Reprographics, Inc. (Videographer) + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Kara@linkrocklaw.com +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Phil Burlington, Esq. +Nichole J. Scgal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] POTTINGER LLC +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] FLBN 54207 +Brittany N. [REDACTED] FLBN 118247 +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC + +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(above for address purposes only) +Attorney E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b1811a4ea7f74f565a3ad07831d707bbee2c1fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868/EFTA02767868.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767868.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2606, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF VIDEO D N DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.428, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 508.1106262207031, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 508.1106262207031, + 325.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 103.428, + 325.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.172, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 212.08340454101562, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 212.08340454101562, + 413.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 80.172, + 413.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 337.824, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 411.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 390.456, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 463.87554931640625, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 463.87554931640625, + 414.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 390.456, + 414.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 103.68 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767868" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6bd42c8cc2a142e5e0cf5055de12004c8e6928c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +that he and Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") hay malicious prosecution claim against former Judge Jeffrey Streitfe (....) tts gladiator. '), by ant\ Ai i naersigned counsel, hereby gives notice o participate in the mediation of n September 21, 2018. The parties have chosen + +04 + +ainder of page intentionally left blank] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Mediation + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 17th day of August, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +KAREN E. TERRY +Florida Bar No.: 45780 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mails: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Mediation + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +[REDACTED] J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jeffrey Streitfeld, Esquire +Streitfeld Law, PLLC +[jstreitfeldlaw@gmail.com](mailto:jstreitfeldlaw@gmail.com) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4cabd0c694c5b3a610255db8a53eb2c84c9111cd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871/EFTA02767871.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767871.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2706, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 119.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 119.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 376.992, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 376.992, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 348.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767871" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a6ef1534cbec299b0479ff36f8505df93f2d31f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifVCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +AC? + +## AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL SEf. + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the matters no specially set for hearing on Auaust 22, 2018 at 10:00 a.m, before The Hono d W. Hafele, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Wes , Florida, Courtroom 10I) + +| | otio equest | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Filed | Document | +| 3 12/4/17 | No ce of g Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery | +| Responses b | in Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II - V | +| only; | ron I addressed at 12/7/17 hearing) [D.E. 1100 and 1101] | +| [Heard | /7/17, but not completed] | +| wards | otice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery | +| R | nses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege [D.E. 1102 | +| 5 12 At heard | | +| 6 1/10/18 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements | +| | -- Motion was denied as to three clients on 2/28/18, but Court | +| 7 1/18/18 | Motion in Limine Addressing the Admissibility of Exhibit No. 132 | + +&#x27;Because submissions to the Court have been made based on the original Notice, the numbering sequence has not been changed on this Amended Notice. + +| No 1 | Date | Motion/Request | +|------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Filed | Document | +| 9 | 2/2/18 | Epstein's Request for Judicial Notice [D.E. 1178] | +| 10 | 2/12/18 | Second Motion to Lift Confidentiality Designation of Epstein's | +| 11 | 2/26/18 | Motion to Compel Request for Admissions [D.E. 1225] | +| 16 | 3/26/18 | Motion to Change Case Caption [D.E. 1305] | +| 20 | 4/29/18 | Epstein's Renewed Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert With 1335] | +| 21 | 5/2/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify his Trial VO sses [D.E. 1338] | +| 22 | 6/21/18 | Epstein's Motion to Compel to Identify Bgtds m rs of | + +## CERTIFICATE OF ERV + +I certify that the foregoing document has b Service List below on August 20, 2018, through the C of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). to the attorneys listed on the mg portal pursuant to Florida Rule + ++6s + +OCKENBACH, PA ahn Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 Palm Beach, Florida 33401 561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov@linkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearapce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvälida que necesita algun acomodåmiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene der ,tt sid tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la am ili I de ponerse en contacto con Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Wes Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por lo i no 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunal iatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el fiempo ant a omparecencia que se ha S programado es menos de 7 Was; si usted pacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kon ameriken Id Enfim yo na Highway, West Palm Bea jou anvan dat ou ge apre ou fin res mwens ke 7 Ò 'o ; ed akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan enn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou my Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou al Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie onda 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 evou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman nvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96f8e9387f83f73888c2d787033a67ffa0127d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874/EFTA02767874.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767874.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 10222, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.25, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.1411743164062, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.1411743164062, + 100.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 100.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL SEf.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 442.476, + 307.1835632324219 + ], + [ + 166.46400000000003, + 307.1835632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF ERV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 315.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 315.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 72.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 72.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767874" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e02fb38b9d6eb056cbc910e0d0db6573fe48fae9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.md @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") February 2, 2018, Request for Judicial Notice. The Court, having reviewed the Request, having been advised of the agreement of the parties, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND AD OE the Request is GRANTED. The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the following co tions and all pleadings filed in those actions for authenticity purposes only: + +- 1. thstefn Rosenfeld: Adler and Stuart Rosenfeld: v. Scott IF. Rothstein, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE re Rothstein Rosenfedlt Adler, P.A., U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR +- 3. Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, 17" Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 16-CACE-003324 +- 4. Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor; U.S.D.C. N.D. III. Case No. 15-C-6844 +- 5. Norman Hirsch, et aL v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No 13- 80456 + +- 6. +- 7. +- 8. +- 9. +- 10. +- 12. +- 13. +- 14. +- 15. +- 16. +- 17. +- 18. +- 19. Michael Demella v. The Las Olas Holding Company, Inc., I7'h Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 12-028526 Conner v. Clyde Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a All Stars Sports Bar & Grill, 17'h Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 10-002726 Michael Barnes v. Prince's Beach Bar, LLC, d/b/a DP's, 17' tilt" Circuit Court, Broward County Case no. 13-022624 a In and Paul G. Cassell v. Alan M Dersliout, 17°' Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 15-CACE-000072 State of Florida v. Jamesa, Duval County Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX State of Florida v. James Edwards, Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX U.S. Bank National Association v.a J. a, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2010-CA-002613AXXXCE Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley la, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2010-CA-012467AXXXCE I" United Bank v.a , 17'h Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v.aa, 17'h Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2012-CC-003827-AXXXWE Donald D. Baker v. The Hollywood, et at, U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla 60294-Civ-Huck-O State of Florida v. E.W., 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 26985TCA02 State of Florida v. E.W., 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 2006-CF-016146-AXXX-MB State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB . Case No. 08- Case No. 02- Case No. 50- Case No. 50- + +- 20. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB +- 21. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR-163488-AXXX-M13 +- 22. State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 5020077-TR-204547-AXXX-MB +- 23. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, Palm B kounty Case No. 50- 2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB +- 24. State of Florida v. E.W., 15'h Judicial Circuit, each County Case No. 50- 2009-MM-010876-A>C, 2015CF016193000 +- 55. State of Florida v. E.W., Pi 1ass ...i nty Circuit Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF +- 56. State of Florida v.. 'n las County Circuit Court Case No. 16-02416-OC-CF +- 57. State v. Jane Do Palm each County Case No. 50-2005-IN-005174-AXXXX-MB +- 58. State v. JanZ;ot Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666-AXXX-MB +- 59. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-008444 ale of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833- AXXX-MB +- 61. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-009222- AXXX-MB +- 62. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-015821- AXXX-SB +- 63. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 -MB + +- 64. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County AXXX-MB +- 65. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County AXXX-MB +- 66. State of Florida V. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County AXXX-MB Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811- Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864- Case No. 50-2010-CT-037753- +- 67. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Cas AXXX-MB +- 68. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach Co AXXX-MB +- 69. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm B AXXX-NB .10-2010-CT-037705- No. 50-2010-CT-039080- Case No. 50-2010-TR-312095- +- 70. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-001899- AXXX-MB +- 71. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703- AXXX-MB +- 72. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-005400 +- 73. Jam 0 eil Capalbo v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR- -MB oe v. Jamie N. Capalbo, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053- -MB +- 75. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, Broward County Case No. 11020221CF10A +- 76. Balm Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB +- 77. Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Baru Ibrahim Tonaroglu, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB + +- 78. Anna Terry v. Scott and L.M. (minor), 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Court Case No. 04-DR-001691 +- 79. L.M. Assessment,15h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 04-MH-001376 +- 80. L.M. v. John T Riedel, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County DR-003304-XXXX-NB -2007- +- 81. L.M. v. John T. Riedel, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007- DR-004824-XXXX-NB +- 82. Justin Sprague v. L.M., Lee County Case No. 08-DR3141 7 +- 83. State of Florida v. L.M., Palm Beach Comity Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998- AXXX-MB +- 84. State of Florida v. L.M., Palmer \county Case No. 50-2010-MM-017555- AXXX-MB +- 85. State of Florida v. L.M., 1 ,iudicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-MM-002316-AXXX- +- 86. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2013-MM-000924-AXXX-MB +- 87. Justin Lee Sprague v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2013-DR-001053-XXXX-MB +- 88. •(' r fr Associates LLC FK4 Maynor Sachs & Copple LLC v. L.M., 15th Judicial Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2014-SC-010273-XXXX-MB +- 89. Lexine Thrney v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015- DR-010853-XXXX-NB + +Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 15'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800)OC&y of August, 2018. + +## THE HO CIRCUIT C GE NALD W. HAFELE + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley(INA. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepOsearcylaw.com jsx@searcylaw.com dvitale@searcvlaw.com scarolateamOsearcvlaw.com terryteam@a searc law.co Co-Counsel for Defendant col nter-Plaintiff J. Edwards + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLAnnellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counsel or Defendant/Counter-Plainti + +a Edwards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com Co-Counselcaendant/Counter-Plaintiff .1. + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df3b8fc93cbe59dccd7e96b4ea00769bed59721d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878/EFTA02767878.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,432 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767878.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 13241, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REOUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 487.8302001953125, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 487.8302001953125, + 323.6030578613281 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 323.6030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE HO \nCIRCUIT C GE \nNALD W. HAFELE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 279.684, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 507.2046813964844, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 507.2046813964844, + 291.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 291.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 346.265380859375, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 346.265380859375, + 332.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 332.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767878" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6044eae0c9ee3c2c9e2bd7a06c9d4981586b0a31 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OOONBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF MEDIAT c + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that (1) (2) Jeffrey Epstein, (3) = = Burnett, P.A., (4) Intervenors Jane Do d E.W. and (5) = Jaffe Weissing Fistos and Lehrman have agreed e the claims pending in this action and in the show cause proceeding pending united fl States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in In re Ro ein nfeldt Adler, P.A., Case No. 09-34791-RBR, as follows: + +DATE: October 9, 2018 + +TIME: 9:30 a.m. (all day reserved) + +LOC Carlton =Jorden Burt, P.A. 525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +IATOR: Howard Teacher + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 30, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1) or through e-mail. + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fa] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: tt • lin Primary: Secondary: cklaw.com Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +## SERV, + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes sjdevard West Palm Beach, L 3 me care law sx car la m dvital .com scarolat w. m to Lu rc law.com + +Co-Cou or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +Trial Je r Plaintiff7Counter-Dtendant + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmbeFLAopellateLaw.com nisQFLAppellateLaw.com kbt@,FLAppellateLaw.com + +Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintlea J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

|

VIA E-MAIL
Niall T. McLachlan
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.
100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 4200
Miami, FL 33131
nmclachlan@cfblaw.com
Counsel for [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.

| +|

VIA E-MAIL
[REDACTED] Ianno, Jr.
Carlton [REDACTED] Jorden Burt, P.A.
525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jianno@carltonfields.com
jmeehan@carltonfields.com
Counsel for Fowler [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.

| | + +2086104 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..088c4aad5775244273608a557b7bd5078facb910 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887/EFTA02767887.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767887.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5974, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF MEDIAT c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.784, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 377.604, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 377.604, + 329.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 329.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERV,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 389.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 389.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767887" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89e7ff2c9821e06dfda14362309854aa2f6c9f36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and y, + +Defendants. + +J. C. ), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Certificate of Authority pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720(e). along with his attorneys Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale Jr., will appear at the October 9, 2018 mediation with the authority required by Rule 1.720(b). + +## CERTIFICATE OF AUTST + +remainder of page intentionally left blank] + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Certificate of Authority + +IHEREBY CERTIFY that atrue and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 30th day of August, 2018. + +> S JACK SCAROLA + ++6s + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 O S KAREN E. TERRY Florida Bar No.: 45780 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: sx nunccarm@searcylaw.co Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam1 searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarab Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 5 la Atto or J. ; and + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Certificate of Authority + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Rockenbach, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Kara@linkrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt Burlington & Rockenbach, P. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 3 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for teLaw.com + +.1. staftefil 425 N And Fort Phone: (95 Fax: (954)-524-2822 uire tice.com enue, Suite 2 , FL 33301 -524-2820 + +sCo \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7487b9ee002465aeeb8b52dc452c993487deb588 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890/EFTA02767890.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767890.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2114, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF AUTST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.036, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 216.036, + 345.87 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.9284973144531, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 355.9284973144531, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 108.53999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 166 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767890" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f27791c33398145b468a7718d2514e9a72e2ffbf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800)OCXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# AGREED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIA RDER + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) J. '), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (4) MI Jaffe Weissing Fistos and Lehrman a Jaffe") (collectively, the "MediationParticipants"), to participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby + +ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: + +- i Non-party Fl ttle affe consents to the jurisdiction of this Court solely for purposes of participating in t diation. +- 2. rsuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, , Epstein and a representa Jaffe who has the full authority to settle without further consultation shall appear at the mediation in person. The Intervenors' counsel, who shall have full authority to settle the matter without further consultation, shall appear at the mediation by telephone. + +3. The Mediation Participants shall each file aCertification of Authority ten days in advance of the mediation identifying who will appear at the mediation conference and confirming the person's settlement authority in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure .720(e). + +4. The mediation proceeding is confidential and privileged as settle t niations. All statements made during the course of the mediation are privileged sett scussions, are made without prejudice to any Mediation Participant's legal position d aof discoverable or admissible for any purpose in any legal or administrative proc whatsoever. + +5. Florida law applies and governs the mediati 1 ng, but not limited to, Chapter 44, Florida Statutes, and the following specific conf provisions: + +## a. Florida Statute Section'44. + +44.403 Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act; definitions.—As used yi ss. 4\_4.401-44.406, the term: + +v.. + +- (1) "Mediation I'communication" means an oral or written statement, or nonverbal conduct intended to make an assertion, by or to a mediation participant made during the course of amediation, or prior to mediation if made in furtherance of amediation. The commission of a crime during a mediation is not amediation communication. Mediation participant" means amediation party or aperson ) \_.. st., attends amediation in person or by telephone, videoconference, other electronic means. + - (3) "Mediation party" or "party" means aperson participating directly, or through a designated representative, in amediation and aperson who: + - (a) Is a named party; + - (b) Is a real party in interest; or + +(c) Would be a named party or real party in interest if an action relating to the subject matter of the mediation were brought in a court of law. + +(4) "Mediator" means a neutral, impartial third person who facilitates the mediation process. The mediator's role is to reduce obstacles to communication, assist in identifying issues, explo alternatives, and otherwise facilitate voluntary agreements resolve disputes, without prescribing what the resolution m + +(5) "Subsequent proceeding" means an adjudicative follows a mediation, including related discovery. + +### b. Florida Statute Section 44.405(1) an + +44.405 Confidentiality; privilege; exce + +(1) Except as provided in is ection, all mediation communications shall be confid al. ediation participant shall not disclose a mediation co ca on to a person other than another mediation particip r a cipant's counsel. A violation of this section may be m as provided by s. 44.406. If the mediation is court violation of this section may also subject the m Lon icipant to sanctions by the court, including, but not to, costs, attorney's fees, and mediator's fees. + +(2) edia n party has a privilege to refuse to testify and to prey n y o er person from testifying in a subsequent proceeding n t ediation communications. + +# + Florida Statute Section 44.406: + +44.406 Confidentiality; civil remedies.— + +(1) Any mediation participant who knowingly and willfully discloses a mediation communication in violation of s. 44.405 shall, upon application by any party to a court of competent jurisdiction, be subject to remedies, including: + +(a) Equitable relief. + +- (c) Attorney's fees, mediator's fees, and costs incurred in the mediation proceeding. +- (d) Reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in theA application for remedies under this section. +- (2) Notwithstanding any other law, an application for relief under this section may not be commenced later than 2 years date on which the party had areasonable opportunity to disc ver Jj te breach of confidentiality, but in no case more than 4 years after the date of the breach. +- (3) A mediation participant shall not be subject to acivil action under this section for lawful compliance provisions of s. 119.07. + +6. The mediation is being conduct i th this action (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. =M 5 Ju icial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG) and the show cause proceedings (In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR) but will also address Epstein's potential, claims against + +7. For the limited purpose of the mediation, Epstein's 47 trial exhibits (the "47 e- (\ mails") that Edwards claims are privileged and are currently under seal may be shown by MB attorneys on e mediator, attorneys and insurance carrier representati II= counsel shall bring IMIE copy of the 47 e-mails to the mediation for this limited purpose. Ma counsel shall be present at all times during any review of the emails. No copies of the e-mails may be made and no notes may be taken regarding their content. + +8. The use of the 47 e-mails during mediation will not constitute an additional argument of a waiver by Epstein of any privilege claimed by MIS Jaffe or the + +Intervenors. However, this does not vitiate or limit Epstein's existing waiver arguments, which are preserved pending further rulings of this Court. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 4 day +of August, 2018. + +![]()SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Counsel for [REDACTED]
Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos and Lehrman

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Trov@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0c052acf406128431cf7b836d2dfe76d64690ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893/EFTA02767893.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767893.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 12025, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 116.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIA RDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 444.0284118652344, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 444.0284118652344, + 319.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 319.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Florida Statute Section'44.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 135.864, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 334.764, + 392.0645446777344 + ], + [ + 135.864, + 392.0645446777344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Florida Statute Section 44.405(1) an", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.50999450683594, + 311.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 311.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 325.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 134.50999450683594, + 325.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "+ Florida Statute Section 44.406:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.62000274658203, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 328.11260986328125, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 328.11260986328125, + 573.8524932861328 + ], + [ + 101.62000274658203, + 573.8524932861328 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 326.43 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 315 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 338 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767893" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdeb63bab8bcea49da4c3ee75efb8a9cf0ede707 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.md @@ -0,0 +1,660 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XMCGMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Ao434/ \" 1 + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +C O + +/ + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S A ENDE MOTION TO UNSEAL DISC AND PROPOSED TRIAL E ITS FOR USE AT BANKRUPTCY COURT SHOW CAUSE P1OCEEDINGS AND DEPOSITIONS + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("E oves to unwal the disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" and the 47 documents identiti d pstein's March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List that Counter-Plaintiff purpose of the Bankruptcy C urt's w cause proceedings and depositions, and in thereof, states: ds (`n) claims are privileged for the limited support + +# INTRODUCTION + +on With Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, ovants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a NovembeY2010 Agreed Order' has not been violated and for sanctions. The subject of those + +&#x27;November 30, 2010, Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing on Motion for Relief from the Amended Order (DE 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epsteirtly,a for the Production of All Documents in Response to His Requests Filed by Interested Party M, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR [D.E. 1194]. + +proceedings is a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that had in its files and turned over in February 2018 to Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach. The Bankruptcy Movants claim that retention of the disc is a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order and they seek sanctions against and Epstein for that retention. A show cause hearing is currently scheduled before the Bankruptcy Court on October 26, 201 + +The Bankruptcy Court has allowed limited depositions of Epstein and tatives of Link & Rockenbach and The Bankruptcy Court also allow es to move to take additional depositions. Epstein has now moved the B ourt to take the depositions of the Intervenors, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe b on eir alleged significant emotional distress damages claims based on a disc of app x 27,000 pages sitting in a box in offices for eight years. A copy o e of n is attached as Exhibit A. + +Because the disc itself and the 47 exh\* S • 4ic y ds claims are privileged have been sealed by this Court, Epstein respectfully mov unse those documents for the limited purpose of the Bankruptcy Court's show cause pr i and the upcoming depositions. + +# ACKGROUND + +During the March r8, hearing, the Court instructed Epstein to file under seal Link & Rockenbach's co f the isc and exhibits identified on Epstein's March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List dwards claimed were privileged. The exhibits were filed under seal to protect Epste ate rights. The sealing was accomplished by the Court's April 6, 2018, Agreed Order Directing Clerk to Seal Filings.2 (Exhibit B.) + +As outlined in Epstein's Notices of Compliance with the Court's March 8, 2018, rulings, (Composite Exhibit C) Link & Rockenbach maintains in a sealed box in its offices: (1) the + +&#x27;There was some delay in the sealing because the case was stayed pending appeal.

unredacted Appendix served in support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; and (2) a set of the e-mail exhibits Epstein's counsel printed from the disc and identified on Epstein's March 5, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List which claims were late disclosed and/or identified on his 2011 privilege log3. In addition, Link & Rockenbach has maintained in a sealed envelope Atit \*th, original boxes the original disc that was located in files.

ARGUMENT

The Bankruptcy Court's Show Cause hearing is an evidentia ce nd the parties are required to submit exhibits to the Bankruptcy Court two days anc f the hearing. The disc located in records and the 47 exhibits Eps ed which were obtained from the disc and claims are privileged, are th n 1 16cus of the hearing. Similarly, the witnesses' testimony will be based on the disc i lc7 ibits. ( s ot

Epstein asks the Court to allow ' ou to unseal the box and envelope maintained in Link & Rockenbach's offices for 1 ring the Bankruptcy Court ordered depositions when counsel is present. d envelope will then be resealed at the conclusion of each deposition. Epstein furth sts that he be allowed to provide the Bankruptcy Court two days in advance of thew ca hearing with copies of the disc and 47 exhibits and that his counsel be allowed t the box and envelope for the duration of the show cause evidentiary hearing.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Epstein seeks permission from the Court to allow his counsel, Link & Rockenbach, to unseal the box and envelope maintained in its offices for use as evidence at the

3The exhibits include both the 47 exhibits claims are privileged and other documents printed from the disc but which were earlier produced in the case.

Bankruptcy Court's show cause proceedings and as exhibits at the upcoming depositions as outlined above.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on September 4, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930
+ West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+ (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link
+ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
+ Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: T [REDACTED]
+ Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+ Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + +
+ Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+J. [REDACTED] +		 + Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+J. [REDACTED] +

J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com Co-Counsel or J.

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergera.agwpa.com smahoneya,agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintill7Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Paul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 cassellnelaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Ceti I for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

C

?S\ 2085974Gs'

Jay H Jay o e Associates e Blvd., Suite 250 c Ile, FL 32211 avhowell.com 1 6 cited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and v Jane Doe

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

Debtor.

CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR

CHAPTER 11

JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVEN POSITIONS AND TO COMPEL THEIR MENTAL EXAMI

Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") moves to compel the Lute , E.W. and Jane Doe, to appear for deposition and independent mental examinap6n support states:

INTR

All three Intervenors' ask this Court em an unspecified amount of monetary damages for significant emotional dis at proximately caused because a disc containing approximately 27,000 pages of t in a box in approximately eight years. Th tabled over 20,000 pages that intentionally and voluntarily produced to including more than 100 pages of which were identified on privile Al a ough the Intervenors and claim attorney-client privilege or work produc tion for 47 e-mails (from the 27,000+ pages on the disc) that Epstein identified as trial in the State Court Action,2 no court has yet ruled on the claimed privilege or immunity doctrine. The issue of attorney-client privilege and waiver is pending in the State Court storage room for

&#x27;Because only one Intervenor — L.M. — was a party to the November 2010 Agreed Order, Epstein is separately moving to strike the damages claims of E.W. and Jane Doe based on their lack of standing to seek damages for violation of an Order to which they were not a party. If granted, this Motion will only seek relief as to L.M.

2JeffiTy Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and \_.1a, 156Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009CA040800.

Action before The Honorable Donald W. Hafele. Significantly, it is undisputed that the entire disc, including every e-mail identified as attorney-client privilege, was given to attorney William Scherer who represented investors in (e.g., victims of) Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme in the Razorback litigation.3

For context, this Court's August 16, 2018, Order Denying Epstein's Motion t Strike the Intervenors' List of Requested Relief, etc. (D.E. 6427) directed the Intervenors to amended summary of their damages. The Court emphasized that the summary was i facilitate the convenience of the Court — not to supplant evidence and testimony' at the Court will determine the sufficiency of damages at the evidentiary show ca evidence. Id. The show cause hearing is set for October c 0 after the parties present

Prompting this motion, all three Interveno 'SS Summary of Damages on August 21, 2018, seeking significant emotional dis l i , , for both (i) retention of the disc for eight years and (ii) distributirof idential materials":

  • A^ rare
  • I. Significant emotio6I distress damages, caused to the victims by the conduct of teisand his attorneys in violating this Court's order — e.g. t roperly retaining a copy of the victims' confidential s and subsequently improperly distributing these Epstein and his counsel have caused significant em s to the victims through (among other things) ng f about how he might use these documents and to ho e might distribute these documents. This distress was pounded by Epstein's sexual abuse of the victims and his equent history of abusive and harassing litigation tactics directed towards them.

(D.E. 6432, emphasis added.)

3Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, I7th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943.

Epstein seeks an Order from the Court permitting him to take the Intervenors' depositions on the issue of their alleged damages for significant emotional distress and to compel their mental examinations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35.

ARGUMENT

A. The Intervenors Continue to Improperly Press this Court to Expand its Inquiry Beyond its November 2010 Agreed Order.

The November 2010 Agreed Order which governs provides, in pertinent part: this Court's s )41'cai . inquiry

The law firm of Burnett, P.A., will prin h copy of all of the documents contained on the discs umbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stam d i ments to the Special and an identical set to F vh 11 use same to create its privilege log. agrees t r ar at portion of the privilege log relating to emails on e e ecember 15, 2010, with the remaining portion due t from the date of this order, subject to other orders. ite will not retain any copies of the documents co o the discs provided to it, nor shall any ima es or cop' sa documents be retained in the memory of or ers. Should it be determined that images or copies of the subject documents on ter or otherwise the Court retains jurisdiction to a ctions in favor of Brad or his client.

(D.E. 1194, empha ad /P ).rThe Intervenors, for that al and Jaffe claim that in violated the November 2010 Agreed Order and are seeking sanctions lation. Thus, this Court is tasked with determining if and/or Epstein v"bjated the November 2010 Agreed Order by retaining images or copies of the subject documents on their computers or otherwise and, if they did, sanctions, as appropriate. This is fully consistent with the limitations imposed by the Court on the scope of Epstein's deposition and the Court's verbal statements that it is not deciding "state court issues." The Court has repeated that it is not deciding fa and/or Epstein distributed images of the documents or any other

issue that arose after delivered the disc to Epstein's current counsel, Link & Rockenbach, PA.

The Intervenors' counsel already asked this Court to expand discovery to include the alleged distribution of documents, and the Court denied that request:

MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor we have that in Docket Entry 6345, we join in the request from Jaffe, and we have seven independent requests for the victims, including damages. We woul also like to be — during the deposition we would like to be ab ask Epstein questions, including questions about who distributed these documents to. This involves a childh abuse case, and so if he's disseminating -

THE COURT: No, you're not going to -

MR. CASSELL: — information about that e

THE COURT: - depose Epstein on e r Y to be — he's going to be limi s unwary. tooiu're going f he had knowledge of the disk prior to emulated —

(D.E. 6367, April 13, 2018, Tr. 41:234 " ateem is added.)

At the more recent August will be addressed at the show Searing, this Court confirmed its narrow focus of what

(August 1

THE CO befo me. Oh. 18:5-9.) ow, once again, remember it's a narrow issue estion of, was there a knowing breach of the order, the actual damages resulting from that breach. This n hunting season.

Th the Intervenors' claim for damages connected to Epstein's purported "distribution" of documents is misplaced and should be stricken or ignored along with any alleged damages resulting from the Intervenors' underlying lawsuits and the basis for those claims. The consistent limitation and focus of the Intervenors' claimed damages to those allegedly associated with

retention, per this Court's rulings to date and the November 2010 Agreed Order, will facilitate clarity in discovery and presentation of the issues.

B. The Court Should Permit Epstein to Engage in Limited Discovery of the Intervenors' Depositions on the Subject of Their Significant Emotional Distress Damages and to Compel Their Independent Mental Examinations.

1. The Intervenors Must Prove Significant Emotional Distress.

In its Order to Show Cause, this Court advised that, if it makes a finding o ntempt, it will "consider imposing 'compensatory sanctions for actual damages' i D.E. 6366 at p. 4 (emphasis added).) The Court recognized that, while compens ons may include damages for emotional distress the Movants must prove th c ffered significant emotional distress and a causal connection exists between the signifi e onal distress and the violation of the order. (D.E. 6366, at p. 4, citing In re Mc n, .3d at 1325-26 (quoting Lodge v. Kondaur Capital Corp., 750 F.3d 1263, 12 'ct ir. 2014)). "To establish a claim for emotional distress damages, 'an indivi us ) suffer significant harm, (2) clearly establish the significant harm, and (3) dem usal connection between the significant harm and the violation[.]" In re Arnell, -WIND, 2006 WL 6589025, at \*6 (N.D. Ga. 2006). A claimant may only recov ages for significant emotional distress where he or she "in fact suffered signifi person wou 890, motio al harm and the circumstances .. . make it obvious that a reasonable significant emotional harm." Thomason v. Chestatee Cray. Ass'n, 493 B.R. N.D. Ga. 2013) (quoting In re Dawson, 390 F.3d 1139, 1151 (9th Cir. 2004)). Such damages are only appropriate "where a natural and powerful emotional distress is readily apparent from the nature or extent of the wrongful conduct under the particular circumstances surrounding the ... violation." In re 296 B.R. 890, 895 (Bank-. S.D. Ga. 2003).

2. The Intervenors Should he Compelled to Attend Depositions and Independent Mental Examinations.

Based on the Intervenors' representations in their Summary of Damages, this Court should allow Epstein to take the Intervenors' depositions and compel them to attend independent mental examinations to determine the significant emotional distress allegedly caused by "retention" of documents. The Intervenors placed their mental condition in controversy by claim more than the garden variety of emotional distress ("significant" and "fear") and, there hav provided Epstein good cause for these requests. A mental examination is especiall to determine how the Intervenors' claimed damages may be independently caused the own life choices and overall "significant emotional distress" in order to carve ou h e rtion is truly attributable to retention of a disc for eight years — a \ ' e ervenors themselves have never viewed nor are informed of the contents. For bri "sf'ti pl , all three Intervenors have worked at strip clubs and have taken drugs, L.M. is an Attached as Exhibit A is an illustra Intervenors' criminal history. events play a role in the Intern bM') significant mental distress claims versus a disc of e-mails sitting in a box forme rostitute and E.W. is currently incarcerated. of the public record information showing the ental examination is necessary to ascertain how these

Fedet:5 .Civil Procedure 35(a)(1) provides that "[tjhe court where the action is pending mental ex ation by a suitably licensed or certified examiner." Fed. R. Civ. P. 35.4 a party whose mental . . . condition . . . is in controversy to submit to a .

&#x27;Bankruptcy courts may apply Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. Fed. R. Bankr. Prod. 7035 ("Rule 35 F.R.Civ.P. applies in adversary proceedings"); see also generally In re Dillon, 194 B.R. 533 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1996).

By seeking damages for "significant emotional distress," the Intervenors have fully placed their respective mental states in controversy. Under Rule 35, a movant may seek a mental examination of an opponent whose mental condition is in controversy. Id. A party "who asserts mental or physical injury . . . places that mental or physical injury clearly in controversy and provides the defendant with good cause for an examination to determine the existence and extent of such asserted injury."Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104, 119 (1964) (emp general, courts have found `good cause' exists for an IME when questi extent of emotional problems." Okwen v. Am. Maritime Officers BLOOM/VALLE, 2015 WL 5771808 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2 tied). "In garding the 15-CV-60370- ,ag., Henry v. City of Tallahassee, No. 4:99CV482-WS, 2000 WL 33310900 1 6, 2000) (concluding that a claim of continuing emotional distress provided S .o , a Rule 35 examination). The Court may consider whether one or more of the fol vant factors are met: 1) allegations of a specific psychiatric injury or disorder the claimant seeks unusually severe emotional distress damages; or 3) the claim Rydzewski v. Depuy Orthop 12868731, at \*1 (S.D. Fl es that her mental condition is in controversy. See Inc., No. 11-80007-Civ-n, 2012 WL 2012).

In Reaves ayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-00049-CEH-SPC, 2011 WL 4837 V 1 a. Oct. 12, 2011), the court evaluated whether a plaintiff had placed her menta n in controversy, and whether the defendant had shown good cause to take an independent mental examination under Rule 35. In responding to interrogatories, the plaintiff stated, in part, that the defendant's conduct had caused her "significant emotional distress." Id. The court found that the plaintiff "has alleged she is suffering from an ongoing emotional condition

which is unusually severe and is sufficient to meet Rule 35's 'in controversy' and `good cause' requirements." Id. at \*3.

Although some courts have noted that, under Rule 35, "a plaintiff does not put his mental condition in controversy by seeking damages based on emotional distress," a plaintiff undoubtedly does so where he or she "alleges further evidence of mental or psychological disorde .." Vega v. Bermudez, No. 1:14-cv-24600-UU, 2015 WL 13697613 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21 citation omitted). Here, the Intervenors are not making a garden variety claim for or emotional distress. Their additional claim that their emotional distress is "signifi e, entitles Epstein to mental examinations. Reaves, 2011 WL 4837253. And lest t be doubt, the Intervenors have gone further—claiming "fear about how [Epstein] Nt' . e documents and to whom he might distribute these documents. . . . compou !1§5, sexual abuse of the victims l i bt arN and his subsequent history of abusive and h tic'tt ion tactics directed towards them." (D.E. 6432.) "[W]here the plaintiff alleges th IS garden variety claim for emotional distress stemming from the defendant's urts will order a mental examination." Gomez v. Lozano, No. 09-22988-CIV, 2 0 W 014100, at \*2 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2010) (emphasis added) (finding mental conditio ntroversy" where plaintiff alleged he suffered from anxiety and was "constantly q ed d anxious" about the incident).

Intervenors are seeking damages for "significant emotional distress" against Epste and have made particularized allegations concerning the nature and causes of their "fears," Epstein is entitled to mental examinations to determine the existence and extent of such damages. Schlagenhauf, 379 U.S. at 119. The Intervenors' own Summary of Damages provides Epstein good cause for a Rule 35 examination.

3. The Court Recognized That Additional Depositions May he Needed.

In its April 20, 2018 Order to Show Cause (D.E. 6366), the Court permitted Jaffe, and the Intervenors to take the depositions of Epstein and representatives of and Link & Rockenbach. When this request was granted, no request to take the Intervenors' depositions was pending because the Intervenors had not yet articulated their signific t emotional distress damages. However, the Show Cause Order allowed the parties to mo dditional depositions if necessary. Id. at p. 5. Now that the Intervenors have fill Ca nary of their claimed damages, the Intervenors' depositions on the topic of their "si t c otional distress" damages is well within the Court's authority related to • co mpt proceeding, and, 4 0 significantly, necessary to ensure fairness and a level pla • g e

4. The Intervenors Should Not Be o Create Their Testimony and Damaues Based on Epstein's T esrt 5,

The Intervenors either have signific a,s, o al distress damages from a disc existing in a box at office for or they do not. The Intervenors' counsel has premised their alleged "signific al distress" on how Epstein will testify at his upcoming deposition. This notion is patent surd. The Intervenors should not be allowed to concoct future emotional distress b their pending C5 disc in a box. (past) ret imony that has yet to be given. Rather, the Intervenors must prove their significant emotional distress is connected to Epstein's counsel's

ermore, as this Court has clearly recognized, the issue in this case is whether Epstein had knowledge or possession of the disc / documents before February 2018. The Court and parties already know the answer to that question is "no" and that Epstein's deposition is, at best, a mere formality, and at worst, pure harassment and an attempt to obtain an advantage in the State Court Action. In fact, on August 14, 2018, Epstein served his hearing exhibits upon the parties, including

the Intervenors, which included Epstein's Declaration attesting that he has never seen the disc, has never received a copy of it and only first learned of its existence in February 2018. See Epstein's Declaration attached as Exhibit B. Nevertheless, Epstein's testimony should not be allowed to influence the Intervenors' alleged significant emotional distress damages and the Intervenors should not be allowed to view or read the transcript of Epstein's testimony nor sho Id they be informed of its contents before they testify at deposition and/or the show ca ng, and Epstein respectfully requests that the Court enter an order accordingly. 5. The Intervenors Have Never Reviewed the Conten OK.

Finally, it is unclear how the Intervenors could have su Vsi scant emotional distress Therefore, Epstein has asked the State Court Judge u e 47 exhibits at issue in the State without even knowing the contents of the materials Eps t an s counsel allegedly retained. Sly Court Action to be used as evidence in these i t. Epstein will be amending that Motion to also be allowed to use those docum'Le its at the intervenors' depositions, should this Court permit same.

AS ) C CONCLUSION

Epstein respectfu ests that he be allowed to take all three Intervenors' depositions and to compel th Rule 35 independent mental examinations to determine the existence and quantu eir alleged significant emotional distress, and how it relates to Epstein's alleg nonexistent—"retention" of the disc. Epstein further asks the Court that the Intervenors be directed not to read or learn the contents of Epstein's deposition testimony in both these show cause proceedings and the State Court Action before their testimony at deposition and the show cause proceedings. Alternatively, Epstein seeks this relief from L.M. only if the Court

strikes E.W.'s and Jane Doe's claims for "significant emotional distress" damages because they lack standing to bring them.

GOOD-FAITH CERTIFICATION

Epstein's counsel certifies that on August 21, 2018, he asked the Intervenors' counsel if the Intervenors would appear for deposition and a mental examination, but the Intervenors oppose the relief sought.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

AS

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 4, 2018, a true and of the foregoing was served electronically to all registered users on the CM/EC t hich includes counsel identified on the service list below.

I hereby certi District of F Court set admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Rule 2090-1(A).

RICE <IcW) STORFER & CO LL ird Avenue, Suite 1800 u e, FL 33301 Aspame 462-8000; (954) 462-4300 [fax]

By: Is/ Chad P. PuRatch CHAD P. PUGATCH (FBN 220582) cpugatch@rprslaw.com

- AND —

SERVICE LIST

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link SCOTT J. LINK (FBN 602991) scott@linkrocldaw.com

Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein

0

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mmccann@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Counsel for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

[REDACTED] J. Edwards
Brittany N. [REDACTED]
Edwards Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
brittany@epllc.com
Counsel for [REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED],
Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

+
+

Paul G. Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of
Utah
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+		 +

Peter E. Shapiro
Shapiro Law
8551 West Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 3000
Plantation, FL 33322
pshapiro@shapirolawpa.com
Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+
+

Niall T. McLachlan
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.
100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 4200
Miami, FL 33131
nmclachlan@cfiblaw.com
Counsel for [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.

+		 +

Isaac M. Marcushamer
Berger Singerman LLP
1450 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1900
Miami, FL 33131
imarcushamer@bergersingerman.com
Counsel for Liquidating Trustee

+

2083639

EXHIBIT A

L.M.

  • 1. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-MM-002316-AXXX-MB — Soliciting another to commit prostitution. L.M. running escort service. stated growing up her mother was in the escort business which caused her to become involved in it."
  • 2. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-084}33 L.M. and E.W. soliciting sex
  • 3. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case o.1,028781 at age of 14, having sexual relations with an 18-year Id. Mother knew of sexual relationship, but did not know it was ffiegal, oul not control her, but did educate her on safe sex
  • 4. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offen rt Case No. 13-100174 Complaint that ex-boyfriend distribut her neighbors stating that she was a prostitute
  • 5. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Of nsb Report Case No. 12-025901 Child abuse investigation into L g present during altercation she was involved in with her sister M. as holding her sister by the back of the throat. L.M.'s father of L.M.'s sister's boyfriend while L.M. beat on him and a friend him. Noted that L.M., her father and sister ss ere abusing Xanax, ma nd alcohol. L.M.'s father was in the moonshine business and L. er owns a prostitution ring
  • 6. Palm Beach Cou eriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 09-067050 Child abuse inv on into L.M.'s son being present during altercation she was invo ed in her sister's boyfriend
  • 7. rney v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015- 853-XXXX-NB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 52173 — Turney claimed her son's father was living with L.M. and, when 'siting him, was being abused by L.M. and L.M.'s son. Turney's son claimed they had "sex parties" and "hurt him."
  • 8. L.M. Assessment, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 04-MH-001376 — Marchman Act filed by father: "Does not listen and has bad attitude. Comes home when she wants to and is in trouble with police for one reason or another. She is taking Xanax, cocaine and alcohol"
  • 9. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-605242 Simple battery

  • 10. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 09-044965 Battery
  • 11. Anna Terry v. Scott =, 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2004-DR-001691- XXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 04-030740 — L.M. threatened to kill another student, threw things at her and attempted to run her over with a golf cart; restraining order issued
  • 12. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County C9se No. 50- 2010-MM-017555-AXXX-MB — Criminal mischief / road rage — th wing item at another vehicle
  • 13. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case Ike X114 Sliced neighbor's tires
  • 14. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm ounty Case No. 50- 2013-MM-000924-AXXX-MB — Retail theft
  • 15. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office O 1 e ort Case No. 04-091683 Runaway
  • 16. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Offi s eport Case No. 07-048173- Alleged child neglect
  • 17. Palm Beach County Sh s Office Offense Report Case No. 03-104546 Witness to assault in by Dolls establishment
  • 18. Palm Beach Coups s Office Offense Report Case No. 04-019468 Victim of assault
  • 19. Palm Bea ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-086777 Doitic turbance; fight with father
  • 20. Ca.)lm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 14-056185 Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police aim Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 14-080955 - Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police
  • 22. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 17-047135 Domestic disturbance; failed to cooperate with police — would not put dogs away
  • 23. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-06692 Domestic disturbance

  • 24. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-073437 Domestic disturbance
  • 25. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-087957 Domestic disturbance
  • 26. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-138285 Domestic disturbance
  • 27. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. Atimi t -047967 Domestic disturbance
  • 28. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Cpesjli\,07-605437 Domestic disturbance
  • 29. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense R e No. 07-601764 Domestic disturbance
  • 30. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office OQ ort Case No. 12-022380 Domestic violence
  • 31. Palm Beach County Sheriff's se Report Case No. 14-110038 Domestic violence
  • 32. Palm Beach County S ice Offense Report Case No. 14-143988 Domestic violence
  • 33. Palm Beach Co)ntty ytiffs Office Offense Report Case No. 14-149652 Domestic viole
  • 34. Palm Bea ty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 14-150902 Dom tic p to I potential theft
  • 35. ayne Seaman, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- -D' -0113274OOCX-NB — Domestic violence alm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 12-121047 Domestic disturbance
  • 37. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 13-047084 Domestic disturbance
  • 38. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 17-169751 Domestic disturbance

  • 39. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 16-160017 Domestic disturbance
  • 40. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 95-099109 Domestic dispute between L.M.'s parents 4I. Justin Sprague v. L.M., Lee County Case No. 08-DR3141 — Custody dispute — Father of L.M.'s son: "She has moved a number of times, partys to much, multiple abusive boyfriends." [Typographical errors in original]
  • 42. L.M. v. John T. Riedel, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County C 50-2007- DR-003304-XXXX-NB — Petition for injunction for dating vice; oyfriend on cocaine
  • 43. L.M. v. John T. Riedel, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beac DR-004824-XXXX-NB -- Petition for injunction fo intoxicated / violent
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49. ase No. 50-2007 violence; boyfriend Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office O e ort Case No. 13-081178 — Reported theft then would not olice Palm Beach County Sheriff's se Report Case No. 12-106910 — Witness to battery upon boyf heetah's Nightclub L.M. v. Justin Sprague, Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2006-DR-015889- hild support dispute Justin Lee Spra , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2013-DR-0010 -MB — Custody dispute State of F 50-2007-T L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 759-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; failure to stop at red light lorida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. -TR-024102-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; unlawful speed tate of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-033050-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; proof of insurance
  • 51. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-045627-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; no lamps or illuminating devices
  • 52. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097995-AXXX-NB — Driver's license not carried / exhibited on demand

  • 53. State of Florida v. L.M.. 156 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097991-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; failure to use seat belt
  • 54. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-261718-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; unlawful speed
  • 55. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998-Afl-MB — Driving citation; license plate not assigned; proof of insurance
  • 56. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm B unty ase No. 50-2008-TR-067444-XXX-SB — Driving citation; proof oyis j ce
  • 57. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, P County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067445-AXXX-SB — Driving citation; nkglawingly operating a vehicle while driver's license suspended
  • 58. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Ci alm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-195830-AXXX-MB — Dri on; proof of insurance
  • 59. State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judi Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338340-AXXX- g citation; following too closely
  • 60. State of Florida v. L.M., Judiaia1 Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338339- — Driving citation; failing to carry driver's license
  • 61. State of Florida L. T15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-34 -SB — Driving citation; speeding
  • 62. State Flo d v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 0.TR 82840-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding
  • 63. Sta o Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 010-TR-098843-AXXX-MB —Driving citation; speeding State of Florida v. L.M., 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173416-AXXX-MB - Driving citation; failure to use seat belt
  • 65. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173415-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; proof of insurance
  • 66. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-173563-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; failure to carry driver's license

  • 67. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-175658-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding
  • 68. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-TR-093785-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; improper / defective equipment on golf cart
  • 69. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Coun Case No. 50-2015-TR-140544-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; expired regist on
  • 70. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm B cad;nty ase No. 50-2015-TR-140545-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; fail rry driver's license cs
  • 71. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, P ch County Case No. 50-2016-TR-007216-AXXX-MB - Driving cit\$i48, uu owingly operating a vehicle while driver's license suspended
  • 72. State of Florida v. L.M., 15th Judicial C , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045479-AXXX-MB — Mlle c ation; proof of insurance
  • 73. State of Florida v. L.M., 15d' c uit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045493-AXXX — D7iving citation; speeding
  • 74. State of Florida v. Lai& 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 2008-TR-102448 - Driving citation; failure to yield the right of away

E.W

  • I. Palm Bead pty Sheriff's Office Offense Report, Case No. 04-084433 L.M. and W. s is ting sex
  • 2. . W, 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. 2012-CF-029832 tution and possession of a controlled substance tate of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2006-CF-016146-AXXX-MB — Aggravated battery
  • 4. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB — Simple battery
  • 5. State of Florida v. E.W., 6'h Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013- CT062524 — DUI causing damage to person or property

  • 6. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 Theft of Xanex pills
  • 7. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 Landlord report of suspected drug activity
  • 8. State of Florida v. E. W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2016-CF-004732000AHC — Drug trafficking in amphetamine 28 to 200 grams
  • 9. State of Florida v. E. W., 151° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County k e No. 50- 2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB — Possession of cocaine
  • 10. State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beac 2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB — Possession of schedule I of marijuana, possession of narcotic equipment Case No. 50 ce, possession
  • 11. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, palm Be County Case No. 50- 2010-CF003921-AXXX-MB — Possession oftedule II substance, possession of schedule IV substance, possession of mar;, - uana
  • 12. State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judici 1 i aim Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - lod of marijuana
  • 13. State of Florida v. E.W 15' it icia Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-MM-018257-
  • 14. Palm Beach Coun Theft -Possession of marijuana ffice Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 — Grand IS. Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-049448 — Possession of marijuana and outstanding warrant for grand theft
  • 16. St Flo da v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 005135-AXXX-MB — Grand theft
  • 17. of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 012-CF-007118-AXXX-MB — Grand theft
  • 18. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB — Retail theft
  • 19. State of Florida v. E.W., 13'h Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-012614 — Petit theft
  • 20. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-015507000AHC - Petit theft

  • 21. State of Florida v. E. W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-MM-01601800 — Petit theft (second conviction)
  • 22. State of Florida v. E.W., 13" Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 — Petit theft; felony third degree
  • 23. State of Florida v. E.W., 13" Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2016-CF-004733000AHC — Felony petit theft; resisting officer without violence
  • 24. Boynton Beach Police Incident Report #2040097 Shoplifting A
  • 25. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report 09-085397 Shoplifting
  • 26. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense R e No. 07-604687 Possession of stolen equipment
  • 27. State of Florida v. E.W, Pinellas County c "t t Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF
    • Arrest hold by U.S. Marshall for p elony 1st degree
  • 28. State of Florida v. E. W, Pinell uit Court Case No. I 6-02416-OC-CF
    • Arrest hold by Hillsborough or processing; Felony In degree
  • 29. Palm Beach County Sh Offense Report No. 03-067249; Eva v. James R. Gebbia, 15" It-cult, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633 — Allegations of le r scivious molestation upon E.W. by mother's boyfriend; mottJEt c ddict
  • 30. Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-091886 Altercatio mother; mother arrested for battery
  • 31. Belch Police Department Incident Report No. 7028375 Altercation er employee at Platinum Gold
  • 32. Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-096606 unaway
  • 33.
  • 34. West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-21604 Runaway West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-19767 — Runaway
  • 35. State of Florida v. E.W., Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA021127XXXXNO
    • Driving while license suspended; arrested for outstanding warrants relating to DUI

  • 36. State of Florida v. E.W., 6th Judicial Circuit Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA-128504 — Felony; driving while license permanently suspended
  • 37. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50- 2010-CT-0 I 0505-AXXX-NB — Operating vehicle while license suspended/revoked, unregistered motor vehicle, unassigned plate/tag; failure to appear arrests
  • 38. State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beath County, Case No. 50- 2010-CT-029906-AXXX-MB — Operating vehicle while license suspended/revoked, speeding, failing to display registration atd insurance; failure to appear arrest
  • 39. State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beac Co t , Case No. 50- 2010-TR-227746-AXXX-MB — Unknowingly opera9Cng r e while driver's license suspended, cancelled or revoked
  • 40. State of Florida v. E.W., 15111 Judicial Circui each County Case No. 02- 26985TCA02 — Driving citation; violatio I tion
  • 41. State of Florida v. E.W., 15`h Judie \ t i alm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB — D ve icle in unsafe condition
  • 42. State of Florida v. E. W. 15 Ida Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2007-TR-166340- ving vehicle in unsafe condition
  • 43. State of Florida v. Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 5020077-TR-20481i9- -MB — Driving citation; not wearing seat belt
  • 44. State of Florida ., 1516 Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-TR- -AXXX-MB — Driving citation; not wearing seat belt
  • 45. StgrGJFlo da v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 233639-AXXX-NB — Driving citation; speeding
  • 46. of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50- 010-TR-227747-AXXX-MB — Driving citation; failure to provide proof of insurance
  • 47. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2011-CT-014746-AXXX-SB — Driving with a suspended driver's license; failing to drive in single lane
  • 48. State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB — Driving with a suspended driver's license; probation revoked

Jane Doe

  • 49. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 11-076192 Driving with a suspended license; lied to officer and gave false name
  • 50. State of Florida v. E.W, 6th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 522013TR062559 — Careless driving
  • 51. State of Florida v. E.W., 18th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 62010TR074209A88830 — Evasion; failure to pay toll
  • 52. State of Florida v. E.W, 6th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas CodAlyase No. 522013TR062943 — Failure to show proof of insurance
  • 53. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hills . bunty Case No. 2015TR009235000 — Operating a motor vehicle wit ex tration
  • 54. State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit C ii rough County Case No. 2015TR009236000 — Driving on suspended th knowledge
  • 55. Andrew Pastor v. E.W., 15th Judicial 1m Beach County Case No. 50- 2009-CC-014838-XXXXMB — Ten
  • 56. Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W., 13th J 't Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2014-CC030790A001HC — nt e ction
  • 57. Palm Beach County 603909, 07-60391 burglary C ffice Offense Report Case Nos. 07-603908, 07- 11 and 07-603912 — Roommate arrested for

  • a v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case F-001160-AXXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 3106 — Child neglect; Jane Doe was pregnant and using needles to shoot plates; Jane Doe's child was attacked by pit bull when unattended Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB — Alleged Jane Doe had an I.V. drug use addiction; while pregnant with his child, she was shooting up using heroin and Roxicodone
  • 3. Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Bata Ibrahim Tonaroglu, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB — Turned custody of child over to grandmother

  • 4. State of Florida v. Jane Doe 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-015821-AXXX-SB — Possession of narcotics equipment
  • 5. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2010-MM-021516-AXXX-MB — Possession of drug paraphernalia; Jane Doe admitted to shooting up pills and she informed officers where she kept her needles
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 05-0356 4 9 — Grand theft auto Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 0tlig t e336 Elderly abuse State v. Jane Doe, 151 Judicial Circuit Court, Palm B MM-029242-AXXX-MB; Palm Beach County Sh Case No. 06-150364 — Retail theft
  • 9. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial No. 50-2007-MM-008444-AXXX-MB; Offense Report No. 07-067112 — Re Case No. 2006 ffice Offense Report rt, Palm Beach County Case h County Sheriff's Office
  • 10. Palm Beach County Sheriff' Offense Report Case No. 05-019158 Possession of tobacco by a
  • II. State of Florida v. Ja Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2002-IN-024424- — Possession of tobacco by a minor
  • 12. State v. Jane D udicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2005-IN-005174- -MB — Possession of tobacco by a minor
  • 13. Palm eac minty Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-094884 R way
  • 14. each County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-108484 away
  • 15. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-113653 Runaway; uncontrollable
  • 16. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-116357 Runaway
  • 17. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 02-116631 Runaway

  • 18. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report Case No. 02-122524 Runaway
  • 19. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-116298 Runaway; officer found Jane Doe in a vehicle occupied by two known heroin addicts
  • 20. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-118053 Runaway
  • 21. West Palm Beach Police Report Case No. 03-29553 Runaway
  • 22. West Palm Beach Police Report Case No. 04-000491 R
  • 23. Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Offense Report -114489 Jane Doe reported child abuse claim against mother; d11 interview, Jane Doe (age 15) disrespectful and admitted to smokin, ck of cigarettes every 2-3 days and had been smoking for 3-4 yea
  • 24. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Of rt Case No. 04-120214 Child neglect; Jane Doe left home alo I grandmother was on vacation; neighbor complained of suspect a vities
  • 25. State v. Jane Doe, 15th Judi irc Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- 2005-CT-006666- reless driving, driving without a license, leaving the scene of a
  • 26. State of Florida No. 50-2009 wrong direction e, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case -AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; driving in
  • 27. StatepfFlo v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case -009222-AXXX-MB — Driving without a license; failure to I eaT crests
  • 28. of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case
    • o. 2010-CT-027408-AXXX-SB Driving without a license; careless driving
  • 29. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 — Driving with knowledge without license; speeding failure to display registration; failure to appear arrests
  • 30. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County Case No. 11020221CF10A - Driving while licensed revoked; failure to obey traffic sign

  • 31. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; speeding
  • 32. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license
  • 33. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037753-AXXX-MB — Driving with no license; no seat belt
  • 34. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 151° Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach unty Case No. 50-2010-CT-037705-AXXX-MB — Driving with no licen ests for failure to appear
  • 35. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, P County Case No. 50-2010-CT-039080-AXXX-MB — Driving ense; speeding; arrests for failure to appear
  • 36. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial C Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-312095-AXXX-NB - S alion
  • 37. State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th J \*a it Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-TR-001899-AXXX-MDt.FNo roof of insurance
  • 38. State of Florida v. Jane Doe ml Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-003703 — Driving with no license; arrests for failure to appear
  • 39. Jane Doe v. Ja . ! ' ' lbo, 15i° Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-20 2053-XXXX-MB - Domestic
  • 40. Batu 'bra aroglu v. Jane Doe, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Cas N . 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB — Domestic

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.aov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

Debtor.

CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR

CHAPTER i I

JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SWORN DECLARATION OF FACT

  • 1. My name is Jeffrey E stein. I am the Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant in the action styled Epstein v. Rothstein, , and LM., No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG pending before the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beac Cou , Florida (the "state court proceeding").
  • 2. The law firm of Burnett, P.A. C' o ite"), represented me in the state cNt roceeding from June 2010 through May 2012. As part of that representation, represented me in proceedings in this case concerning a Subpoena that my original counsel issued to the Bankruptcy Trustee.
  • 3. In November 2017, I retained Link & Rockenbach, PA, to represent me in the state court proceeding.
  • 4. In February 2018 Scott J. Link of Link & Rockenbach, PA informed me that he had located a disc ("CD") in White's files labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp."
  • 5. I have no personal dge of how the CD came to be in possession.
  • 6. I have never the CD nor received a copy of it.

Executed in the Un ed States Virgin Islands, August / t(2018. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

APPROVED AS,O FORM:

74NEY FL-JEFFREY EPSTEIN

EXHIBIT B

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCO THSTEIN i dividually, J. , individually, and LM; individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

AGREED ORDER DIRECTING C < :104EAL FILINGS

THIS MATTER, coming before the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffity Epsteiti's ("Epstein") Motion to Make C Re Confidential. The Court, pursuant to its ruling at the March 8,2018, hearing, d i ad vised of ihe agreement of the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJU at the Motion is GRANTED.

The followingfido ri, n is provided pursuant to Florida Rule of:Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(3) and 15th dicial. trctiit Administratiye Order 2.303-3/18:

  • (A) Chill. unds.under subdivision (c) for determining the. information confidential: The Court deems the items to be filed under seal confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Adridnistration 2.420(c)(9) because Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff CS) and Intervenors L.M.; E.W., and Jane Doe (Interveners")have asserted a claim of privilege over :the documents.

(C) Whether any party's name is determined to be confidential and, if so, the particular pseudonym or other terms to be substituted for a party name: The Court is sealing the items listed below in their entirety. Should any documents later be unsealed, the documents will be redacted and pseudonyms and initials will be used for Intervenors Jane Doe, E.W. and L.IvLIiit'any other persons the Court deems appropriate.

(D) Whether any progress docket or similar records generated to document activity in the case are determined to be confidential: No.

(E) The particular information that is determin to fidential:

  • o Disc labeled "Epstein
  • The following documen dentified on his March 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List claimed as of which and the Intervenors have

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-102645
13-20303754
13-30303655
13-40014935
13-5015273
13-604493-04495
13-70001436
13-803998-040006
13-902231
13-1001300
13-110009037
13-1202906-02908
13-130013368
13-1411237
13-150800631
13-170002670
Ex. No. 13-18ME No. 01464App. No.
13-190100471
13-2001403
13-2102684-0268551
13-2201475
13-240369479
13-251228933
13-260116638
13-270125872
13-2815113-15114
13-3026481
13-3126394
13-3325922
13-34..2648060
1373526356;
13-3626570.
13-37, 00992
13-40014237
13-4105071
13-430204381
r'" 13-44.'03731-03732
.13-45.06406-06408
13-4601686 -.48
13-4711123-1112550
13.4802088
13-4911126-1112732
13-5011128-1113149
13-5108459
13-5225925
13-53.25874
13-5408348-08349
13-5508355
13-5611145
. 13-6003191-031924
13-612728487
13-622689389
13-6401255
13-6526836-2683790,91
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-6604398-044022, 34
13-6704408-044121
13-682680792
13-6926808-2680993
13-702737994
13-712729395
13-722602163
13-732727096
13-742735597
13-7527325100
13-7727322101
13-7826777-26781
13-7926782-26786102, 103, 104
13-8026088-26089105
13-812599852
13-8327072108
13-85Legamaro
Depo Ex 6
13-862674711
13-8808042-0804416
13-8926741-2674213, 15
13-9008059-0806117
13-9227522109
13-9326756-267589
13-9408036-0803819
13-96Legamaro
Production
13-97267628
13-980111721
13-9927051-20752112
13-10008121-0812320
13-10126749-2675223
13-10208128-0813024
13-10308118-0812022
13-10408131-0813325
13-10508124-0812626
13-10608135-0813810
13-1072749427
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ex. No.No.App. No.
13-10826760
13-10927025111
13-1102599728
13-1112593767
13-1122697384
13-11326604-2660556
13-1142673757
13-1152648557
13-11607019-07021
13-1172701358

(F) Identification of persons who are permit the confidential information: Unless and until ordered by this Court, only this o and the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall be able to view the items under seal.

(G) The Court finds that (i) , duration, and manner of confidentiality ordered by the Court are no broader tha n to protect the interests set forth in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2. 20(c); (ii) no less restrictive measures are available to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c).

(H) TheCleik of Court is directed to publish the order in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(4).

The items identified above shall remain under seal until further order of this Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach n , Florida this 6 . day of April, 2018.

THE HO DO LD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT COUR. JUDGE

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. Edwards

+
+██████████ J. ██████████
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████ + 		+

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+ and Jane Doe

+

Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et aL

15" Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Agreed Order Directing Clerk to Seal Filings

Page 7

Scott J. Link

Kara Berard Rockenbach

Rachel J. Glasser

Link & Rockenbach, PA

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Scottelinkrocklaw.com

Kara@linkrocklaw.com

Rachel©linkrocklaw.com

Tina@linkrocklaw.com

Troya,linkmcklaw.com

Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCmmter-Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein

Jay Howell

Jay Howell & Associates

644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250

Jacksonville, FL 32211

javhowell.com

Limited Intervenor Co-Coun and Jane Doe

• Lail., EX!

EXHIBIT C

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

CO SA

SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS , CRIPTS AND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Je '....." Epstein ("Epstein") hereby serves the transcripts (morning and afternoon sessions Compliance with the Court's lifted. arch 8, 2018, hearing, and provides his Notice of pstein will file this Notice with the Court once the stay is

THE COURT'S RULINGS

At th g, the Court made the following rulings:

  • s to Intervenors' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the pleadings relating to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a proposed Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.)
  • The sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.)

I Although no written Order has been entered and the proceeding is stayed, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record.

  • In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2-63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Sessjon, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.)

On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District ourt ppeal entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review.

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Ep u co el, Link & Rockenbach, PA, have complied with the Court's rulings at the Mal 2018, hearing as follows:

  • Link & Rockenbach, made any further dissemination of the documents included in the Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to Seco Admissible Evi nal exhibits or other documents from the disc that ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Siii ea has asse privi claims over.
  • On March 8018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its co-counsel (Jack rger), its litigation team working on this matter, and its expert, Timothy to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents ned from the disc and any copies of the discs that they had in their possession. ÷ • n March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul YY Caccell on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
    • J. Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated.
    • Link & Rockenbach, PA is assisting counsel to seal the redacted version of D.E. 1242, Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to ' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for

Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED].

    +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and has deleted the electronic version from its system.
    • +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA, has placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes.
    • +
  • • In [REDACTED] March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log, Edwards alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged:
    • +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.[REDACTED] No.App. No.
113-102645
213-40014935
313-5015273
413-604493-4495
513-70001436
613-110009037
713-130013368
813-150800631
913-170002670
1013-190100471
1113-251228933
1213-3026481
1313-342648060
1413-3526356
1513-3626570
1613-4403731-03732
1713-4506406-06408
1813-460168648
1913-4711123-1112550
2013-4911126-1112732
2113-5225925
2213-5325874
2313-5611145
2413-6003191-031924
2513-6604398-044022, 34
2613-6704408-044121
2713-8626747711
2813-8808042-0804416
2913-8926741-2674213, 15
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
3013-9008059-0806117
3113-9326756-267589
3213-9408036-0803819
3313-97267628
3413-980111721
3513-10008121-0812320
3613-10126749-2675223
3713-10208128-0813024
3813-10308118-0812022
3913-10408131-0813325
4013-10508124-0812626
4113-10608135-0813810
4213-1072749427
4313-10826760
4413-1102599728
4513-1112593767
4613-11326604-2660556
4713-11607019-07021
    +
  • • [REDACTED] also objected to the following additional exhibits as being late disclosed:
    • +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
113-20303754
213-30303655
313-803998-040006
413-902231
513-1001300
613-122906-2908
713-1411237
813-1801464
913-2001403
1013-2102684-0268551
1113-2201475
1213-240369479
1313-260116638
1413-270125872
1513-2815113-15114
1613-3126394
1713-3325922
1813-3700992
1913-40014237
2013-4105071
2113-430204381
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
2213-4802088
2313-5011128-1113149
2413-5108459
2513-5408348-08349
2613-5508355
2713-612728487
2813-622689389
2913-6401255
3013-6526836-2683790,91
3113-682680792
3213-6926808-26809
93 AN
3313-702737994
3413-7127293
3513-722602163
3613-7327270
3713-742735597
3813-7527325100
3913-7727322101
4013-78267
4113-792 6 6102, 103, 104
4213-808 6089105
4313-812552
4413-072108
45Legamaro
46A- 927522109
47 146/)3-96Legamaro
413-9927051-20752112
4913-10927025111
5013-1122697384
113-1142673757
) 5213-1152648557
5313-1172701358

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has marked the exhibits identified above and placed them in a sealed envelope for filing with the Court under seal once the stay is lifted in order to preserve Epstein's appellate record. Link & Rockenbach, PA will retain a set of these exhibits in a sealed envelope in the sealed box maintained in its offices for appellate purposes.
  • With the exception of those documents it is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that has identified as privileged.

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which will be filed under seal with the Court once the stay is lifted.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has placed original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with its original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the further rulings by the Court. oxes until
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate e disrc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from i r system and Dropbox.
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA will work with its IT pens move copies of any documents has claimed as privileged e-mail servers.

ERTIFI ATE F

I certify that the foregoing document has Service List below on March 11, 2018, via e-m is lifted. shed to the attorneys listed on the ill e served with the Court once the stay

+6s

INX & ROCKENBACH, PA 55 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

By: /s/ Scou J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Rachelelinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+
+

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathotojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

+

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

PlaintiWCounter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

UPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI AND ScHteC STREIJILNI'NSGSI

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

/

In H COURT'S 1(EP Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey (L "Epstein') hereby updates his March 8, 2018, Notice of Compliance with thef arch 8, 2018, rulings and states:

Q SA

r URT'S RULINGS

At that hearing, the Cou e the following rulings:

  • As t IntellPerrirs' (E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe) request to temporarily seal the ply rigs re sting to the e-mails, the Court granted the request and asked for a Order. (Morning Session, 3/8/18 4:16-5:1.) ÷ sanitized redacted version of Epstein's Notice of Filing Appendix shall be tied under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 75:20-23.)
    • In order for Epstein to preserve his rights concerning the Court's rejection of the last-minute request for an in-camera inspection and the striking of his newly

Although no written Order has been entered yet on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Privilege Log, Epstein has complied with and will continue to comply with the Court's rulings on the record.

disclosed exhibits, Epstein shall file under seal the newly disclosed trial exhibits which has claimed are privileged. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 62:2- 63:1.) These do not include exhibits that were already in the Court file or used in this case. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18 76:8-21.)

  • Link & Rockenbach, PA's copy of the disc entitled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that is the subject of the dispute will be filed under seal. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 75:12-18.)
  • Link & Rockenbach, PA to retain boxes, includi g e original disc. (Afternoon Session, 3/8/18, 80:8-81:15.)

On Friday, March 9, 2018, at 4:15 p.m. the Fourth District Co Agica I entered its Order staying the state court action pending its review. That stay uiic :In part, on March 20, 2018, and Epstein hereby updates his Notice of Compliant A

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE

0 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey EpsteV. ittii , Link & Rockenbach, PA, has complied with the Court's rulings at the Marc \, 1 caring as follows:

  • Link & Rockenbach, has 7tot made any further dissemination of the documents included • pendix in Support of Epstein's Response in Opposition to E and Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Sco of Adm. t le dente, the newly disclosed trial exhibits in which claims pri i ege, or other documents from the disc that has asserted p •vilege ms over.
  • Neit er Eps n nor his general counsel (Darren Indyke), were ever provided with a co of the disc nor did they review or have access to the disc or the disc's Epstein and his general counsel also never received the disc or alleged leged" documents from the firm or any other former counsel. ÷ec er, Epstein and his general counsel were provided with select e-mails by Link Rockenbach, PA that were included in the Appendix or identified as trial exhibits. Immediately after the hearing on March 8, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA notified its client, its client's general counsel (who was at the hearing), its cocounsel (Jack Goldberger, who was at the hearing), and its litigation team working on this matter to destroy all hard copies and electronic versions of the documents obtained from the disc.
    • Timothy Chinaris, a former Ethics Director of the Florida Bar who provided an expert affidavit in this action, was also not provided with a copy of the disc but, rather, received a binder (in paper form) containing the unredacted Appendix.

Mr. Chinaris was instructed to destroy the binder along with any electronic copies he may have had. Mr. Chinaris confirmed his compliance with this request.

  • Neither the disc nor any of its contents were ever provided to the Gunster firm or any of its attorneys nor were the contents of the disc ever discussed with them.

A Goes

    +
  • • On March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul Cassell, on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated.
    • +

Mr. Cassell's request was addressed, and granted by stipulation, at the March 8, 2018, hearing. Both Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel, however, failed to provide the Court with a proposed order at the hearing, which would have resulted in the immediate sealing of two docket entries that had not yet been opened to the public. While Mr. Cassell and [REDACTED] counsel had ample time during the hearing to have an Order prepared and signed by the Court, a proposed order was not circulated to Epstein's counsel until the following afternoon, Friday, March 9, 2018. Judge Hafele had made known to the parties that he would not be in Court on March 9, 2018, because of the Bench Bar Conference, but he advised where he could be found, if needed. Nevertheless, the Fourth DCA's stay was entered on March 9, 2018, within hours of the transmittal of the proposed order. Furthermore, on the evening of March 9, 2018, the Clerk opened the two docket entries that are at issue to the public.

During the weekend of March 10 and 11, 2018, Epstein's counsel worked tirelessly with [REDACTED] counsel to obtain emergency relief from the duty judge to seal the two docket entries at issue. The duty judge, however, deferred the matter to Judge Hafele. Accordingly, on the morning of March 12, 2018, Epstein's and [REDACTED] counsel went before the Court at 8:30 a.m. and obtained an Order, nunc pro tunc, sealing the two docket entries at issue:

    +
  1. 1. Epstein's Notice of Filing Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence (D.E. 1242, a 353-page filing with attachments containing actual emails as well as a summary of its contents); and
    2. +
  2. 2. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED] (D.E. 1252).
    3. +

The Clerk then sealed the two docket entries which had been open to the public for more than 48 hours.

    +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the Court file and deleted the electronic filed version from its system.
    • +
    +
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed the Unredacted Appendix that was served but not filed in a sealed box that will be maintained in its office, unopened, for appellate purposes.
    • +
  • • In [REDACTED] March 5, 2018, Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Matters Listed on [REDACTED] Privilege Log, [REDACTED] alleged the following exhibits identified by Epstein were privileged:
    • +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.[REDACTED] No.App. No.
113-102645
213-40014935
313-5015273
413-604493-4495
513-70001436
613-110009037
713-130013368
813-150800631
913-170002670
1013-190100471
1113-251228933
1213-3026481
1313-342648060
1413-3526356
1513-3626570
1613-4403731-03732
1713-4506406-06408
1813-460168648
1913-4711123-1112550
2013-4911126-1112732
2113-5225925
2213-5325874
2313-5611145
2413-6003191-031924
2513-6604398-044022, 34
2613-6704408-044121
2713-8626747711
2813-8808042-0804416
2913-8926741-2674213, 15
3013-9008059-0806117
3113-9326756-267589
3213-9408036-0803819
3313-97267628
3413-980111721
3513-10008121-0812320
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
3613-10126749-2675223
3713-10208128-0813024
3813-10308118-0812022
3913-10408131-0813325
4013-10508124-0812626
4113-10608135-0813810
4213-1072749427
4313-10826760
4413-1102599728
4513-1112593767
4613-11326604-2660556
4713-11607019-07021

also objected to the following additional e L' ' which were printed from the disc as being late disclosed:

No.Ex. No.ltpp. No.
113-203034 454
213-30355
313-80006
413-922
513-14q.,2 00
613-906-2908
711237
\* 1
101464
91 -01403
10-2102684-0268551
111 ,„,,,„13-2201475
1213-240369479
( 1313-260116638
)13-270125872
1513-2815113-15114
1613-3126394
1713-3325922
1813-3700992
1913-40014237
2013-4105071
2113-430204381
2213-4802088
2313-5011128-1113149
2413-5108459
2513-5408348-08349
2613-5508355
No.Ex. No.No.App. No.
2713-612728487
2813-622689389
2913-6401255
3013-6526836-2683790,91
3113-682680792
3213-6926808-2680993
3313-702737994
3413-712729395
3513-722602163
3613-732727096
3713-742735597 A
3813-7527325100
3913-7727322
4013-7826777-26781
452
4113-7926782-26786
26088-2608949
4213-80
4313-81
4 413-83
4513-85
4613-92109
4713-96g o
4813-7051-20752112
49111
e 9ISLI17025
126973
51GI 42673757
52-1152648557
SI'S.,13-1172701358

A

obj cted to other documents Epstein identified as newly disclosed trial ibi. .ut those were obtained from public sources over which and assell cannot assert privilege claims and, therefore, they are not included as of this Notice of Compliance.

Link & Rockenbach, PA placed an exhibit sticker on the 100 newly disclosed exhibits identified above to correspond with Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. Two sets of those exhibits were made. One has been retained by Link & Rockenbach, PA in a sealed envelope in a sealed box maintained at its offices for appellate purposes. The other set was initially retained in a sealed envelope at Link & Rockenbach, PA, however, on March 21, 2018, in light of the lifting of the Fourth District Court of Appeal's stay, in part, those exhibits were filed under seal. Epstein has also moved the Court to Make the Court Records Confidential in compliance with the 1511 Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09

and set that Motion for hearing on April 9, 2018.

  • • With the exception of the trial exhibits and appendix items identified above which Link & Rockenbach, PA is maintaining in a sealed box for appellate purposes, Link & Rockenbach, PA has destroyed all hard copies of the documents it reproduced from the disc that [REDACTED] has identified as privileged.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed its copy of the disc in a sealed envelope, which it retained at its offices until the stay was lifted. In that regard, on March 21, 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA filed the disc under seal and moved the Court to make the court records confidential in compliance with the 15th Judicial Circuit's Administrative Order 2.303-9/09. That Motion is set for hearing on April 9, 2018.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA placed [REDACTED] original disc in a sealed envelope which will be maintained with [REDACTED] original records at the offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA until further rulings by the Court.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA will maintain control of the [REDACTED] boxes until further rulings by the Court.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA has deleted the electronic duplicate of the disc and the electronic version of the exhibits identified above from its computer system and Dropbox, the online service by which those documents were transmitted to counsel of record.
  • • Link & Rockenbach, PA began deleting electronic documents from its system and planned to work with IT personnel to remove copies of any documents [REDACTED] has claimed as privileged from its e-mail servers. In light of [REDACTED] objection to the deletion of electronic documents, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA has not taken further steps to delete electronic documents. The Court made no rulings on the preservation of these documents and Link & Rockenbach, PA does not agree that the review [REDACTED] demanded is appropriate. Until the Court rules otherwise, however, Link & Rockenbach, PA will not delete any further electronic documents and will work with its IT personnel to preserve those documents.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 23, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [f

By: /s/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rocken c 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (F 57 251) Primary: Scot ' kr aw.com Primary: Kara a li ocklaw.com Primary: ache dlinkrocklaw.com Seco idana.linkrocklaw.com S roy®IinlcrocIdaw.com

Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Sca la, lbart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beac es Boulevard West Palm B F 3409 dvital rcylaw.com scarolatea scarcylaw.com terrvteamasearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or D endant/Counter-Plaintiff J.

unsel for Plaintifj7Counter-Defendant Epstein

T

Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb(aFLApnellateLaw.com njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com

Co-Counseltiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

J. [REDACTED]
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+

NOT A CERTIFICATE

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..477a008ac57da526fbe0f3182b317b67ddbf06bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899/EFTA02767899.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3247 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767899.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 58, + "chars": 115505, + "elapsed_seconds": 21.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S A ENDE MOTION TO UNSEAL \nDISC AND PROPOSED TRIAL E ITS FOR USE AT \nBANKRUPTCY COURT SHOW CAUSE P1OCEEDINGS AND DEPOSITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 503.82 + ], + [ + 356.1629638671875, + 518.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 518.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 350.7969665527344, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 350.7969665527344, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 251.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 251.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 582.8035125732422 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 582.8035125732422 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.82000732421875, + 127.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 127.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVEN POSITIONS \nAND TO COMPEL THEIR MENTAL EXAMI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.844, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 529.0601806640625, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 529.0601806640625, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 83.844, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 362.60302734375 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 362.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 344.58758544921875, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 344.58758544921875, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Intervenors Continue to Improperly Press this Court to Expand its Inquiry \nBeyond its November 2010 Agreed Order.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 542.8582153320312, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 542.8582153320312, + 210.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 210.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Court Should Permit Epstein to Engage in Limited Discovery of the Intervenors' \nDepositions on the Subject of Their Significant Emotional Distress Damages and to \nCompel Their Independent Mental Examinations.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.456, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. The Intervenors Must Prove Significant Emotional Distress.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 453.2563171386719, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 453.2563171386719, + 196.863037109375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 196.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. The Intervenors Should he Compelled to Attend Depositions and Independent \nMental Examinations.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.43743896484375 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 71.43743896484375 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 99.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 99.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. The Court Recognized That Additional Depositions May he Needed.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.43743896484375 + ], + [ + 495.6702880859375, + 71.43743896484375 + ], + [ + 495.6702880859375, + 86.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 86.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. The Intervenors Should Not Be o Create Their Testimony and \nDamaues Based on Epstein's T esrt 5,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 331.04620361328125 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 331.04620361328125 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 385.05206298828125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 385.05206298828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 278.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AS ) C CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.60000610351562, + 454.1015625 + ], + [ + 349.43621826171875, + 454.1015625 + ], + [ + 349.43621826171875, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 221.60000610351562, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GOOD-FAITH CERTIFICATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 416.6581726074219, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 416.6581726074219, + 141.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 141.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.5181579589844, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.5181579589844, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 279.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 279.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.3151550292969, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 340.3151550292969, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 101.26946258544922, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 101.26946258544922, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 99.756, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 99.756, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 122.2909927368164, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 122.2909927368164, + 486.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 486.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.aov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.108, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 418.85498046875, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 418.85498046875, + 128.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 189.108, + 128.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S SWORN DECLARATION OF FACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 249.48 + ], + [ + 460.8641662597656, + 249.48 + ], + [ + 460.8641662597656, + 263.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 263.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 539.9340209960938, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 539.9340209960938, + 126.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 126.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER DIRECTING C < :104EAL FILINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 465.7505798339844, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 465.7505798339844, + 361.60247802734375 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 361.60247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 152.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0284423828125, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE OF COURT'S MARCH \nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE SA ARNINOGTITCE ONFS\n, CRIPTS \nAND COMPLIANCE RT'S RULINGS1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 494.7030029296875, + 390.3630676269531 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 390.3630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE COURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 379.348388671875, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 233.17200000000003, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE OMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 460.905517578125, + 351.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 351.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special [REDACTED].", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.148, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 140.148, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFI ATE F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 338.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 338.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 667.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 683.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 683.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UPDATED NOTICE OF COMPLI \nAND ScHteC STREIJILNI'NSGSI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 491.43600000000004, + 376.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 376.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "r \nURT'S RULINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.56, + 430.6875 + ], + [ + 379.340087890625, + 430.6875 + ], + [ + 379.340087890625, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 232.56, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA LIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 460.8406066894531, + 336.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 336.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.27227783203125, + 431.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 431.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767899" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd08296c39918bd2f7077ada5995911c136f5f14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintifc + +vs. + +L.M., J. individually, and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +Defendants. + +## INTERVENORS CERTIFICATE OF S T M WF AUTHORITY + +Sexual assault victims L.M., E.W., and (hereinafter "the three victims"), proceeding pseudonymously and through erst counsel, hereby file this Certificate of Settlement Authority that Jay Howel be vailable, via telephone, during the upcoming mediation in this matter and has uthority for the victims. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY t a e and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attar t, this 5th day of September, 2018. + +/s Tay New( + +JAY HOWELL Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): jay@jayhowell.com 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 (904) 680-1234 + +PAUL G. CASSELL S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah + +Utah Bar No.: 6078 +383 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(801) 585-52021 +*Pro Hac Vice* + +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +--- + +1 This daytime business address and telephone number is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████████ J. Edwards

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ and Counsel for Farmer
Jaffe Weissing ██████████ Fistos and Lehrman

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1e7e4d18e1f59df6b633171de56b7e0b8e77bc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957/EFTA02767957.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767957.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5361, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 529.992, + 111.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 111.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERVENORS CERTIFICATE OF S T M WF AUTHORITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 326.5787658691406 + ], + [ + 480.8626403808594, + 326.5787658691406 + ], + [ + 480.8626403808594, + 343.38043212890625 + ], + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 343.38043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 369.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 369.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 278.46000000000004, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767957" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c224bbcb46a40783f5ad709b3bdf33f5a60fea60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. , Individually, and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffr and pursuant to Rule 1.350 Flori f Civil Procedure, files this his Response dated September 16, 2010 of Defend r-Plaintiff, J. Request to Produce and states as follows: , by and through his undersigned counsel, + +1. All,4temen of the defendant, J. pertaining to any of the issues in this ! + +esponse: The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has not taken a statement of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. with regard to the allegations of this complaint. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to the scope of this Request because it may encompass all of the transcripts from the various proceedings and the various other cases in + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +A + +C O + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, JE t STEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTI if, LEY J. REQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED1EPTEMBER 16.2010 + +which Mr. spoke as counsel. As such, the Request is overbroad, burdensome, and seeks irrelevant information. + +- 2. All statements of any witness you intend to use at trial for impeachment. + +Response: Any statements that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, have taken at this time are protected under the work product privilege. The PlaintifVCounter-Def dant will not know until depositions are taken, what statements may be available fd dke at trial for impeachment. + +- 3. All documents including but not limited to diaries, jAtra, computer database materials or any other written or electronically stored info hat reflect or relate to any -:---,, ..% , communication to or from minor females and/or any physiesl c,ontact which did or was planned \ 'it \Y to occur between you and any person who w as\a nortemale\* at the time of the physical contact or planned physical contact includin not imited to any massage, fondling, or sexual interaction of any kind (this should in females) essage pads or appointment scheduler for minor + +Response: Objecrtt : irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and protected b the Fifth Amendment. + +- 4. t7 \ .tten documents supporting the allegations in your complaint. + +p'onse: Since discovery is still continuing in this matter, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, of produce all written documents supporting the allegations in the complaint. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has requested relevant documents from the bankruptcy trustee, to which the Defendant has categorically lodged objections, and the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant expects some of those records to support the allegations in the complaint. + +5. All message pads, calendars of your schedule or appointments or other documents containing your "massage" appointments; and + +Response: Objections: irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and protected by Fifth Amendment. + +6. A complete copy of each and every exhibit which you intend to intro~lue or have considered introducing into evidence at trial. + +Response: Since discovery is continuing, the PlaintiWC fendant does not know at this time the exhibits he intends to introduce or consider i od ing at trial. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SER + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a truland co Sated via O Email, O Facsimile, S. Mai rre5S149 y of October, 2010 to: the foregoing has been duly ivery, O Federal Express this + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipl ( .cA \ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, . . 250 Australian Avenue So Suite 1400 West Palm Beach JC 3340 -5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: Josh L. Ackerman, Jr Fla. Bar No. 235954 BU P.AY. 901 Point We 777 South Flagler D West Palm Beac lorl9e33401 Telephone: (561) 44 + +Facsimile: 80 76 Co to darn + +Atto Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5203eacaf5e7b5199ef2c7ce9c97da108ed04972 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960/EFTA02767960.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767960.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4070, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, JE t STEIN'S RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTI if, LEY J. \nREQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED1EPTEMBER 16.2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 511.4931945800781, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 511.4931945800781, + 386.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 386.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 323.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 323.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767960" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f59bf7a29680210a79064c04e24282df90616063 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## --- ORDER.C.RANT-INGOGYINGJbEF T SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND ED COMPLAINT Go + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on September 12, 2018, upon Defendant Scott Rothstein's Motion to Dismi 1 ended Complaint. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and Plaintiff Jeffrg ps 's Response, and having heard argument of counsel, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND AD at the Motion is + +f ehtir — itee2e fla'e l d'05.0 € 07 a-4 ,tistere.X9 + +of September, 2018. ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm my, Florida this /2 -day + +> THE HON L ONALD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake

| + +Scott J. Link +Kara Berard Rockenbach +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +[Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +[Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +*Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.* +*and Jane Doe* + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9ec3d1b8be839e4f9d92aaf1c2bac2a5cdcf9d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964/EFTA02767964.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767964.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6803, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "---\nORDER.C.RANT-INGOGYINGJbEF T SCOTT \nROTHSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND ED COMPLAINT \nGo", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.145, + 214.36407470703125 + ], + [ + 513.8512573242188, + 214.36407470703125 + ], + [ + 513.8512573242188, + 332.42498779296875 + ], + [ + 101.145, + 332.42498779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.364, + 132.193 + ], + [ + 353.0112609863281, + 132.193 + ], + [ + 353.0112609863281, + 147.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 262.364, + 147.73248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767964" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02f273b7ce807b411b7bb03e114336edf1c17d6b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.md @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT; COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA04080IDCXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS AN IMPLICATING THE FIFT \ A NOTICE OF FILING ERY RESPONSES ENT + +THIS MATTER came before the Court ng n December 7, 2017, and August 22, 2018, upon Counter-Plaintiff J. a") Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery R plicating the Fifth AMendment dated December t 4, 2017. The Court, having re ' ies s' Notice, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the p , it is hereby + +ORDERED ND DGED as follows: + +- 1. ections that have been overruled below, except those specifically noted, an adve can be argued to the jury. (12/7/17 Tr. 44:3-15; 50:13-18; 125:3-126:7.) +- 2. The parties shall submit competing proposed Jury Instruction on the adverse inference issue.' (3/8/18 Tr. 103:5- 105:13.) + +filed his proposed instruction on March 29, 2018 (D.E. 1311) and Epstein filed his proposed instruction on April 24, 2018 (D.E. 1329). + +3. The Court hereby makes the following specific rulings concerning Epstein's objections to [REDACTED] use of Epstein's depositions and written discovery testimony at the trial of this matter: + +| March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein | | +|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| +| Page and Line | Ruling | +| 8:11-19 | Objection overruled | +| 8:20-25 | (12/7/17 Tr. 31:14-32:12; 44:3-15) | +| 11:23-12:1 | Objection sustained | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 44:25-47:19) | +| 12:2-13 | Objection sustained | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 47:20-24) | +| 12:15-20 | Objection sustained | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 47:25-48:2) | +| 15:13-19 | Objection sustained | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 48:3-50:4) | +| 15:20-24 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 50:5-18) | +| 17:11-16 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 50:19-55:24) | +| 17:17-22 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 55:25-56:6) | +| 17:24-18:4 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 56:7-57:14) | +| 18:6-10 | Objection overruled | +| 18:11-16 | (12/7/17 Tr. 57:15-66:21) | +| 18:23-19:5 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 66:23-70:6) | +| 34:23-35:17 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 70:7-11) | +| 36:1-9 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 70:12-73:24) | +| 36:10-37:7 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 73:25-77:4) | +| 38:23-39:6 | Objection overruled | +| 39:13-20 | (12/7/17 Tr. 77:5-79:5) | + +| MiltriP | Ma ch 17, 2010 Deposition of. Jeffrey Epstein rifttilfri -f,7_.; 6 | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| War | asilinlitza- ; ' .,L:j,:f,iRujiti -t. :‘f,tlieafra;Itli | +| 39:21-40:1 | Objection overruled | +| 40:2-12 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 80:16-17) 4: 1.34/\ 1 | +| 40:17-21 | Objection overruled | +| 40:22-41:3 | Objection overruled | +| 41:4-9 | Objection overruled | +| 41:10-19 | Objection overruled | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 81:7- c | +| 42:3-13 | Objection ove | +| 42:13-18 | Objection rul | +| | (12/7/ r. 8 1-24) | +| 42:19-43:1 | Ob rruled | +| 44:3-7 | O j • n overruled | +| | 1 /17 Tr. 82:5-7) | +| 44:8-13 | Objection overruled | +| 44:14-20 ( .S | Objection overruled | +| 44:2 -45: | Objection overruled | +| 45:8-16 | Objection overruled | +| 45:17-24 | Objection overruled | +| 46:1-15 | Objection overruled | +| 71:12-17 | Objection sustained | + +| March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein | | | +|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Page and Line | Ruling | | +| 88:19-89:2 | Objection sustained | | +| 89:4-10 | (12/7/17 Tr. 90:17-95:12) | | +| 89:19-23 | All objections, except form, sustained | | +| 90:2-7 | (12/7/17 Tr. 95:15-102:3) | | +| 91:20-92:4 | | | +| 93:6-16 | | | +| 95:16-96:3 | Objection sustained | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 102:4-104:22) | | +| 97:23-98:9 | Objection overruled | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 104:23-107:17) | | +| 104:3-9 | Objection sustained | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 107:18-109:16) | | +| 104:11-20 | Objection sustained | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 109:17-21) | | +| 106:7-10 | Objection overruled | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 109:22-112:17) | | +| 107:20-108:6 | Objection overruled; adverse inference determination deferred | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 112:18-114:16) | | +| 108:8-23 | Objection overruled; adverse inference determination deferred | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 114:17-119:11) | | +| 109:5-17 | Objection overruled; adverse inference determination deferred | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 119:12-121:22) | | +| 111:3-4; 18-20 | Objection overruled; adverse inference determination deferred | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 121:23-123:5) | | +| 111:23-24; 112:13-17 | Withdrawn | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 126:14-127:1) | | +| 112:22-113:8 | Objection overruled | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 127:2-14) | | +| 113:9-25 | Objection overruled | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 127:15-128:9) | | +| 114:25-115:13 | Objection overruled | | +| | (12/7/17 Tr. 128:10-129:25) | | + +| March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein | | +|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| Page and Line | Ruling | +| 115:21-116:1 | Objection overruled
(12/7/17 Tr. 130:1-21) | +| 116:2-7 | Objection overruled
(12/7/17 Tr. 130:22-131:9) | +| 128:15-129:3 | Objection overruled
(12/7/17 Tr. 131:10-17) | + +| January 25, 2012 Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein | | +|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| Page and Line | Ruling | +| 8:9-21 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 30:6-31:5) | +| 9:7-9 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 31:19-32:11) | +| 11:22-24 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 32:8-32:11) | +| 11:25-12:3 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 32:12-32:19) | +| 12:4-7 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 32:12-32:19) | +| 12:16-12:19 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 33:1-12) | +| 12:20-12:22 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 33:13-17) | +| 12:23-14:1 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 33:18-35:3) | +| 21:10-16 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 35:17-41:21; 43:25-44:1) | +| 21:17-22 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 35:17-41:21; 43:25-44:1) | + +| Epstein's Objections to Edwards' General Interrogatories Dated September 16, 2010 | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| Request | Ruling | +| 2, 3 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 56:19-21) | + +| Epstein's Objections to Edwards' General Interrogatories Dated September 16, 2010 | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| Request | Ruling | +| 4 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 56:22-57:9) | +| 5 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 57:10-79:11) | +| 6 | Withdrawn
(8/22/18 Tr. 79:12-14) | +| 8 | Objection overruled
(8/22/18 Tr. 79:15-23) | +| 9 | Objection sustained
(8/22/18 Tr. 79:24-80:11) | + +| Amended Responses to Net Worth Interrogatories Dated December 21, 2012 | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Request | Ruling | +| 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 15 | [REDACTED] may publish Epstein's assertions of the Fifth, Sixth
and Fourteenth Amendment protections of the U.S.
Constitution; all other information is inadmissible and may
not be published
(8/22/18 Tr. 80:13-82:13) | + +| Epstein's Response to Edwards' Request for Admission Dated February 26, 2013 | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Request | Ruling | +| 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13 | [REDACTED] may publish Epstein's assertions of the Fifth, Sixth
and Fourteenth Amendment protections of the U.S.
Constitution; all other information is inadmissible and may
not be published
(8/22/18 Tr. 82:14-84:6) | + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 13 day + of April, 2018. + +![]() + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
██████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +• Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Counter-Plaintiff J. Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses Implicating the Fifth Amendment Page 8 + +Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Link & Rockenbach, PA 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Kara@linkrocklaw.com Tina@linkrocklaw.com Trov@linkrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates Jacksonville, FL 32211 iav@iavhowell.com el L. M., + +Scott@linIcrocklaw.com Limited Intervenor Co-C E.W. and Jane Doe CO 2083856s) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f58493d9ffdcf8508109d5b78a2f4c4b1682d3e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967/EFTA02767967.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,362 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767967.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 21115, + "elapsed_seconds": 11.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT; COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.825, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 545.5699999999999, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 545.5699999999999, + 97.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.825, + 97.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nDEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS AN \nIMPLICATING THE FIFT \\ A\nNOTICE OF FILING \nERY RESPONSES \nENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.01199999999999, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 537.601, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 537.601, + 347.60302734375 + ], + [ + 76.01199999999999, + 347.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.751, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 352.265380859375, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 352.265380859375, + 176.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 261.751, + 176.6080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 65 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767967" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fa5d57373014d6232cfd0f4fac05837dee9300a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Fir I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRE CERTIFICATE OF MEDIATIO TY + +AQo's + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant ule of Civil Procedure 1.720(b) and (e), hereby notifies the parties that he will t the mediation conference on October 9, 2018, in person and will have the full auth e the matter on his own behalf. + +## E + +I certify that the foreg ent has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on Sept 28 018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial A 6(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: ScottelinIcrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov(41inkrocklaw.com + +Trial Counsel for Plaintiffitounter-Defendant Jeffity Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Bro ██████████ Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400

| | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2e32d165c8bf606c56fe08da7aa98c3455a7a2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975/EFTA02767975.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767975.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 6852, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.5, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRE \nCERTIFICATE OF MEDIATIO \nTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 434.52, + 328.863037109375 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 328.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 387.3888854980469, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 387.3888854980469, + 437.60302734375 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 437.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767975" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0431284c0a9c1af84d6b2fffa3eadef541d4389 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that o \ II mber 1, 2018, at 10:0u a.m. at the law offices of Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1555 B Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Plaintiff Je b petein will take the videotaped deposition by oral examination for purposes of dis for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of: + +MARC S. NURIK + +The video deosifion will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer autho - to inister oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who i 'ther a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, this puts you on notice that court reporting services will be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale Searcy, D 2139 Pal West Pa me aw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terryteam@searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counier-Plaintiff J. Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard FL 33409 + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev West Palm Beach, Florida 33 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2 + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link 60 I) Kara Berar bath (FBN 44903) Primary:t tt krocklaw.com Primary: KaraTilinkrocklaw COM Second . Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Plainly/Counter-Defendant ey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmbRFLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.corn Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e401ebc1d31272c28a98c98e9824c798c5d28735 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977/EFTA02767977.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767977.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5299, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.08, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767977" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b56d87a8f47b7d1e10cdd8dee694e91502a40673 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a ad location determined by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein w lce e videotaped deposition by oral examination for purposes of discovery and for use e in said cause, or both, of: + +SCOTT IN (Federal Inmate 91256-004) + +The videotaped depositi ill be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer authorized oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a person s nher a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who i relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [faxj + +By: /s/Scott.l. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac Primary: Primary: Kara Secondary: Secondary: S903) w.com cklaw.com inkrocklaw.com + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnh 2139 Palm Beach Lakes'Boulevard West Palm Beach, L 33109 me c law jsx@searcvlpiciem dvitaleasetvlatcom scarolatearnAscaicylaw.com to y i J, cvlaw.com endani/Counier-Plaintiff + +r Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 prob@FLAppellateLaw.com nis@FLAopellateLaw.com kbfaFLAnpellateLaw.corn Co-Counseillendant/Counier-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..386dbc460e7e67e0603a6b5eaf7814239548cbe2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980/EFTA02767980.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767980.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4837, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 415.53 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767980" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8784b01659f18b0cb7ae3bb0ca0f5089d392fa82 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that o \ th urger 19. 2018, at 10:00 a.m. at Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc., Regions B uil g, 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 10th Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33394, Plaintiff will take the videotaped deposition by oral examination for purposes of dis for use as evidence in said cause, or both, of + +TH S. WILLIAMSON + +The video de isifion will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer autho - to inister oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who i 'ther a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, this puts you on notice that court reporting services will be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale Searcy, D 2139 Pal West Pa me aw.com dvitale@searcylaw.com scarolateam@searcylaw.com terryteam@searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counier-Plaintiff J. Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard FL 33409 + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev West Palm Beach, Florida 33 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2 + +By: /s/ Scot! J. Link + +Scott J. Link 60 1) Kara Berar bath (FBN 44903) Primary, tt krocklaw.com Primary: KaraTilinkrocklaw COM Second . Troy®Iinkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Plainly/Counter-Defendant ey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmbRFLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.corn Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..809fa2913bb07fc74364def861f8965ee6cadf71 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983/EFTA02767983.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767983.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5301, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 487.84228515625, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 473.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 473.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767983" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc126db231b83d8cd8b480159aba577d10aa8a69 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.md @@ -0,0 +1,868 @@ +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +J. individually, + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1.11. CBENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. 4•A' + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +C) 1 + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E ' EXHIBIT LIST + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursu ourt's August 3, 2018, Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and Mediati , hereby lists the exhibits that he may introduce at the trial of this matter.' Epste es his right to amend this list once the Court makes a final determination on his t in camera review of Counter-Plaintiff la alleged privilege doe y other evidentiary issues in this case. + +# B TI UN + +- 0. No Objection \ilitpiv +- 1. All objectio +- 2. All obj- ex ept authenticity +- 3. or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (403) +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +&#x27;The documents identified on this Exhibit List have previously been disclosed and provided to A new set of the documents, however, are being provided to counsel. + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 4 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 5 | 7/31/12 | Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to [REDACTED] Counterclaim | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB
Deposition Transcripts and Statements | | | | | | +| 11 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 13 | 10/10/13 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 14 | 11/10/17 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 15 | 3/17/10 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 16 | 1/25/12 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 17 | 6/14/12 | Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 18 | 4/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] S. Adler | | | | +| 19 | 5/25/11 | Deposition Transcript of Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala with exhibits | | | | +| 20 | 2/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Kretschmar | | | | +| 21 | 3/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Michael Legamaro | | | | +| 22 | 10/12/17 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. | | | | +| 23 | 12/1/17 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen | | | | +| 24 | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger | | | | +| 25 | 2/26/18 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 26 | 4/7/11 | Audio of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jack Scarola's telephonic interview of [REDACTED] | | | | +| 27 | 5/17/11 | [REDACTED] Notice of Filing Transcript of [REDACTED] April 7, 2011, telephonic Interview (D.E. 325) | | | | +| 28 | --- | Open | | | | +| 29 | ---- | Open | | | | +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB
Written Discovery | | | | | | +| 30 | 4/12/10 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 31 | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 32 | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production | | | | +| 33 | 6/21/10 | Epstein's Request for Admissions to Edwards | | | | +| 34 | 7/7/10 | [REDACTED] Response to First Request for Admissions | | | | +| 35 | 4/7/11 | Epstein's Request for Production to Edwards | | | | +| 36 | 5/5/11 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce dated April 7, 2011 | | | | +| 37 | 5/16/11 | Epstein's Interrogatories to Edwards | | | | +| 38 | 6/10/11 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 39 | 12/9/11 | Epstein's Second Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 40 | 1/6/12 | Edwards' Answers to Epstein's Third Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 41 | 1/6/12 | [REDACTED] Response to Request for Production | | | | +| 42 | 2/21/13 | Edwards' Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011 | | | | +| 43 | 7/25/13 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated June 25, 2013 | | | | +| 44 | 8/11/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 45 | 9/5/17 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 46 | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Interrogatories | | | | +| 47 | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production | | | | +| 48 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 49 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|----------|-----|--------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| 50 | 11/13/17 | | Answers to Epstein's Expert | | | +| | | il• | tones | | | +| 51 | 11/13/17 | | | | | +| 52 | N/D | | Privilege Log — Emails November 2009 | | | + +| 53 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. | | | +|----|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 54 | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, interview of Jane Doe | | | +| 55 | 8/7/07
8/14/07 | FBI reports for interview of E.W. | | | +| 56 | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, interview of E.W. | | | +| 57 | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, interview of Jane Doe | | | + +# FBI Reports / Statements + +# L.M. v. Jeffrey + +# 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 5 2 -028051XXXXMB + +| 58 | Misc. | Court docket | +|----|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 59 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | +| 60 | 12/23/08 3/30/09 | Amended Complaint (S\ 61 Notice of Change of ddress | +| 62 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein' & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to PI ' ended Complaint | +| 63 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's R est f r rocluction to Defendant | +| 64 | 8/12/09 | Notice of Pr from Non-Party — Greens | +| 65 | 8/14/09 | Notice o ro uction from Non-Party — | +| | | P acy | +| 66 | 8/19/09 | e t Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | fe es to Plaintiff's Second Amended Com laint | +| 67 | 8/19 | | +| 68 | 8/20/ | Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production | +| 69 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) | +| 70 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 71 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding | +| | | Depositions of Visoski and David Hart | +| 72 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | +| 73 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'s M ace a e | +| 74 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 75 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 76 | Misc. | Court docket 1-A , | +| 77 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. I) ii., | +| 78 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D. | +| 79 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | +| | | 151h Judicial Circuit Case No. 50=2008-G -028051ODCXX'MB | +| 80 | Misc. | Court docket | +| 81 | 9/10/08 | Complaint 7 | +| 82 | 12/23/08 | | +| | | ?S 4 \ 1 | +| 83 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of ddress | +| 84 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epste ' & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to P1 • 1 ended Complaint | +| 85 | 5/18/09 | Notice of Tak g D ition Duces Tecum to | +| | | Myspace with ace's production in response | +| 86 | 6/2/09 | Defend Motion for Order to Terminate | +| | | or Limit ition and Response in Opposition to | +| | | P tiff's ended Motion to Compel for | +| | | an, o | +| 87 | 7/16/09 | otice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 88 | | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 89 | 8/1' i: | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 90 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 91 | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. and Video of | +| 92 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 93 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 94 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------|-------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| | | | | | | + +# Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| Misc. Court docket | | +|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 8/12/08 Complaint (D.E. 1) | | +| 3/26/09 Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or | | +| 98 4/9/09 | | +| Discovery and Procedural Mot' | t Relate to | +| Notices of Taking Deposit | d Subpoenas to: | +| Ghislane Noelle Mary | Wexler, Donald | +| Trump, Mark Eps | a arcinkova, Jean Luc | +| Bruhel, Sarah K | ael Freidman, Rosalie | +| Freidman, and | tithe anka | +| Deposition Tr | c ' t of Jane Doe and Video of | +| Stipulati | ismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | +| F' Ord, | of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | + +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 106 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +| 107 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction
Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets
Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of
Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond
to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | + +# S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 108 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in | +| 109 | 10/16/09 | PlaintiffJane Doe's Notice that Additional | +| 110 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide | +| | | and Incorporated Supporting Memo of La E. | +| 111 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) 1. | + +# CVRA Co cations + +| 112 | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villa | o | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------| +| 113 | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | Villa | | +| 114 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | t.4 | | +| 115 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | o | Eisenberg | +| 116 | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. S | o | e Doe | +| 117 | 7/3/08 | Letter from B | s to Ann | C. | +| 118 | 7/9/08 | Letter f | A. Villafana to Brad | re | +| 119 | 7/9/08 | r fro | A. Villafana to Brad | re | +| 120 | 7/17/08 | tte rom Brad | | to Ann Villafana | +| 121 | 1 | tter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 122 | 10/ | 08 Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 123 | 12/10/ 0 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 124 | 3/1/11 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 125 | 3/15/11 | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell | | | +| 126 | 3/20/11 | Letter from R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | | | +| 127 | 3/22/11 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 128 | 9/29/11 | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 129 | N/D | Court Docket | | | | +| 130 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 131 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| 132 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 133 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 134 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 135 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 136 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 137 | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| 138 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 139 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 140 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | +| 141 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 142 | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 143 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 144 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 145 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 146 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against █████ J. █████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 147 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 148 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against █████ James █████ ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 149 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 150 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 151 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 152 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 153 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 154 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 155 | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 156 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 157 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 158 | 12/14/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 159 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 160 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 161 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 162 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Second Session | | | | +| 163 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 164 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – P.M. Session | | | | +| 165 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 166 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 167 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 168 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 169 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 170 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| Communication | | | | | | +| 171 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 172 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | | | | +| 173 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | | | | +| 174 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 175 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05725) | | | | +| 176 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russell Adler (01574) | | | | +| 177 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (02231) | | | | +| 178 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 179 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendell (01449) | | | | +| 180 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | +| 181 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 182 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 183 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 184 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 185 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 186 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 187 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 188 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 189 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 190 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05239) | | | | +| 191 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 192 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 193 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 194 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05324-05325) | | | | +| 195 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 196 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05344-05346) | | | | +| 197 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 198 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 199 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 200 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 201 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 202 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 203 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee
(01462) | | | | +| 204 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 205 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 206 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 207 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 208 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 209 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01661) | | | | +| 210 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 211 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Russell Adler (02684-02685) | | | | +| 212 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 213 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 214 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05803) | | | | +| 215 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 216 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 217 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 218 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 219 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 220 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 221 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | +| 222 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 223 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11075-11076) | | | | +| 224 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(05852-05853) | | | | +| 225 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 226 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 227 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 228 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11080-11082) | | | | +| 229 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie ██████ to ██████
(05087) | | | | +| 230 | 8/2/09
1:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (03694) | | | | +| 231 | 8/10/09
5:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Edwards to Jacquie ██████ (15113-15114) | | | | +| 232 | 8/10/09
5:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Edwards to Jacquie ██████ (00158) | | | | +| 233 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 234 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 235 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06967) | | | | +| 236 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 237 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
Edwards (06963-06964) | | | | +| 238 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 239 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06959-06960) | | | | +| 240 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06975) | | | | +| 241 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 242 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 243 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06976-06977) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 244 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 245 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 246 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 247 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113) | | | | +| 248 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat (05112) | | | | +| 249 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 250 | 8/26/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Bradley [REDACTED] (01406) | | | | +| 251 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 252 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 253 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 254 | 9/4/09
11:18 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell and William Berger (02043) | | | | +| 255 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07612-07613) | | | | +| 256 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (02595-02596) | | | | +| 257 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED] (07614-07615) | | | | +| 258 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07605-07606) | | | | +| 259 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07607-07608) | | | | +| 260 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07609-07611) | | | | +| 261 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04015) | | | | +| 262 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07646) | | | | +| 263 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07647) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|------------------------------------|------------------| +| 264 | 9/8/09 | | | +| | | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| 265 | 9/8/09 | | | +| | | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| 266 | 9/8/09 | | | +| | | E-mail chain - from J. | to | +| 267 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| | 2:36 p.m. | 07684-07685 | | +| 268 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | | +| | 2:42 p.m. | 07682-07683 | | +| 269 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | J. | +| | 2:49 p.m. | 07695-07697 | | +| 270 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| | 3:25 p.m. | 07680-07681 | | +| 271 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | +| | 7:51 .m. | 07686-07688 | | +| 272 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarno | J. | +| | 7:53 p.m. | (07689-07691) | | +| 273 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from Conchita S | radley J. | +| | 7:53 p.m. | (07692-07694) | | +| 274 | 9/15/09 | E-mail chain - from Bradle | Ards to | +| | 1:08 p.m. | Elizabeth Villar, cc K e | d Pat | +| 275 | 9/17/09 | E-mail chain- y • | to William | +| | 12:11 p.m. | Berger (0208 | | +| 276 | 9/18/09 | E-mail chain - radley J. | to | +| | 12:35 .m. | Adler 18 | | +| 277 | 9/18/09 | E-mail c rom Ja ute | to Ann | +| | 12:35 p.m. | V' fans, J. | 01583) | +| 278 | 9/18/09 | chain - from J. | to Susan | +| | 1:01 p. | n r Wendel 05619-056201m | | +| 279 | 9/1 | E ail chain - from J. | to Beth S. | +| | 2 | illiamson (01144 | | +| 280 | 9/1 | E-mail chain - from J. | to Michele | +| | 2:55 | Dar n 01280-01288 | | +| 281 | 9/21/09 | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| | 1:37 p.m. | 03081 | | +| 282 | 9/23/09 | E-mail chain - from | to Paul | +| | 12:12 .m. | Cassell 08459 | | +| 283 | 9/23/09 | E-mail chain - from | to J. | +| | 8:42 p.m. | 04320 | | +| 284 | 9/24/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | +| | 6:31 a.m. | (04321) | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 285 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 286 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 287 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 288 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 289 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 290 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (19986-19987) | | | | +| 291 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 292 | 10/1/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08348-08349) | | | | +| 293 | 10/1/09
1:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08355) | | | | +| 294 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 295 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 296 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 297 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 298 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael
Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 299 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 300 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-[REDACTED] chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 301 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard
[REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 302 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott
Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip
Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED]
(26507) | | | | +| 303 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 304 | 10/13/09
2:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J.
Discala, [REDACTED] Kretschmar and D. Von Allmen
(23299-23300) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 305 | 10/13/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26827) | | | | +| 306 | 10/13/09
4:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26094-26096) | | | | +| 307 | 10/13/09
5:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27277-27278) | | | | +| 308 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 309 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 310 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 311 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 312 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 313 | 10/15/09
8:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, D. Von Allmen (26882) | | | | +| 314 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 315 | 10/16/09
11:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Wheeler to Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] Edwards and Pat [REDACTED] (01255) | | | | +| 316 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 317 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 318 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 319 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 320 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | +| 321 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | | | | +| 322 | 10/22/09
1:48 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996) | | | | +| 323 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 325 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 326 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 327 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 328 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 329 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01623) | | | | +| 330 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 331 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01625) | | | | +| 332 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 333 | 3/18/10
1:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. Schmidt to Tom Hartog and Donnie | | | | +| 334 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 335 | 3/24/10
2:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog | | | | +| 336 | 4/1/10
3:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Story Cowles | | | | +| 337 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 338 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000001-BJE0000000005) | | | | +| 339 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 340 | 7/14/10 -
1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 341 | 1/1/80 –
2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 342 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 343 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 344 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 345 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 346 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr.
( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 347 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] – Presentations, Recognitions, Bios | | | | | | +| 348 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 349 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 350 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 351 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 352 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad Edwards
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 353 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 354 | 11/8/17 | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 355 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 356 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jaffe's Website | | | | | | +| 357 | 11/9/17 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 358 | 5/7/12 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 359 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 360 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 361 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 362 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 363 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 364 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 365 | | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Jaffe with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------| +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court | +| | | Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey O % | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Agai | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Kee ds | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVBS. Jury Awards \$24 Mil Mass. | +| | | Widower in Fatal Cabana C h | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC-6. Jury Awards 24 k in atal Cabana | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. July a lions to Husband of | +| | | Pregnant Woma e Drunk Driver | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. ury A rds \$24 Million to Widower | +| | | in Fatal Caba Cr sh | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Dail B ness Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| | | Legend ershowitz Over Sex Offender | +| O. | 4/21/14 | Wash ngton Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| | | is ty Can Move Forward on My Crime | +| P. | 4/21 | m Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| | | Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal | +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 366 | 8/10/16 | [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | [REDACTED] Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| Pottinger's Website & Verdicts | | | | | | +| 367 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 368 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] Lawsuits | | | | | | +| 369 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 370 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 371 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 372 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 373 | Misc. | Docket; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 374 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 375 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 376 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 377 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 378 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 379 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 380 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 381 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 382 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 383 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 384 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 385 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 386 | Misc. | Docket; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 387 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 388 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 389 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 390 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 391 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 392 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 393 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 394 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 395 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 396 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 397 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 398 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 399 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 400 | | Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 401 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 402 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 403 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 404 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | Experts | | | | +| 405 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +| 406 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 407 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 408 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | Other Articles | | | | +| 409 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 410 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 411 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 412 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 413 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 414 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 415 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 416 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 417 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 418 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 419 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 420 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 421 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 422 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 423 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 424 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 425 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 426 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part III | | | | +| 427 | 11/18/09 | Former RRA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 428 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 429 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 430 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 431 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 432 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 433 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 434 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 435 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 436 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 437 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 438 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 439 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year Alter | +| 440 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One | +| 441 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | +| 442 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 443 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 444 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| | | L.M. and E.W. — Public c s | +| 445 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O | +| 446 | N/D | Demons Cycle Photographs depi and/or | +| | | L. P \ecords | +| 447 | | License Details - L. 'al ialist | +| 448 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach Coun e Office Offense | +| 449 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach unty riffs Office Offense | +| | | Re rt No. 03 | +| 450 | 1/5/04 | Anna T v. Scott 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| | | Palm B unty Case No. 2004 DR 001691 | +| | | e t Violence | +| 451 | 2/8/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 452 | | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 453 | 7/6/ | In re L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach | +| 454 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 455 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 456 | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 20th Judicial Circuit, Lee County Case No. 08-DR-003141 - Petition to Determine Paternity | | | | +| 457 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 458 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 459 | 2010 | Twitter Account – L.M. | | | | +| 460 | 4/16/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-10-1058307 | | | | +| 461 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 462 | 2/10/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; West Palm Beach Police Department, Report No. 94-12-2384 | | | | +| 463 | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 42-13-00742 | | | | +| 464 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 465 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 466 | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| | | | | | | +| E.W. – Public Records | | | | | | +| 467 | 1/23/18 | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 088078-3334 | | | | +| 468 | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed from Homes by West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 469 | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed from E.W. to Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 470 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 207384-0000 | | | | +| 471 | 2/24/15 | Warranty Deed from William C. Moody and Carole M. Shelton to James S. Moody, III and E.W. | | | | +| 472 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal History Information Report on E.W. | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 473 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report | +| 474 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 475 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 476 | 5/20/03 | Eva v. James R. Gebbia, 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| 477 | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 478 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | C O ' | +| 479 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 480 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department R | +| 481 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Dep t e No. | +| 482 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff' ffense | +| | | Report Case No. 04-07060 a 1,a e Worth Police | +| | | De artment Informati eel ase No. 04-20500 | +| 483 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach Coun e Office Offense | +| | | Re rt No. 06 | +| 484 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach 'unty rift's Office Offense | +| | | Report Case 0. 33067 | +| 485 | 12/6/06 | Arrest / lice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| | | Affidavit ton Beach Police Department | +| 486 | 6/9/07 | : o on Beach Police Department Incident Report | +| 487 | 6/15 | | +| | | ffidavit; Beach 8 Police Department | +| 488 | 6/15/ | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 489 | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 490 | 5/30/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 491 | 9/5/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; North Palm Beach Public Safety Report No. 70-09-009903 | | | | +| 492 | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Report No. 78-10-001780 | | | | +| 493 | 5/8/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Springs Public Safety Report No. 82-2012-10813 | | | | +| 494 | 5/12/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Delray Beach Police Department Report No. 40-12-006170 | | | | +| 495 | 5/13/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Delray Beach Police Department Report No. 40-12-006187 | | | | +| 496 | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Information, Case File Sheet | | | | +| 497 | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11 th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Judgment | | | | +| 498 | 6/21/13 | Florida DUI Uniform Traffic Citation, Pinellas County, Officer Worksheet and Complaint/Arrest Affidavit | | | | +| 499 | 11/20/15 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-016193; Information | | | | +| 500 | 4/4/16 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear Report No. 16-190831; Case No. 16-4733 | | | | +| 501 | 4/4/16 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear Report No. 16-190881 | | | | +| 502 | 12/5/16 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 13 th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2016-CF-004732000AHC - Plea, Sentencing, Judgment | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Jane Doe - Public Records | | | | | | +| 503 | | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property Records for Parcel Control No. 00-40-43-10-00-000-5310 and photographs | | | | +| 504 | 11/1/10 | General Warranty Deed from Glenn R. [REDACTED] to Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane Doe | | | | +| 505 | 3/12/14 | Warranty Deed from Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane Doe to 7696 Oakboro Dr., LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------| +| 506 | 1/18/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| | | History Information .1 7i rt on Jane Doe | +| 507 | 7/12/00 | Arrest Affidavit; Dial | +| 508 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy Huff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County — D5mition of Jane Doe | +| 509 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammyauff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County Case No, 00-875-CFA — | +| 510 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 511 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report No. 02-108484 OP.' | +| 512 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 513 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offe | +| 514 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office e | +| 515 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's a ense | +| 516 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. Bra Dia 9th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, Cou o. 00-375 — | +| 517 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach C ff's Office Offense | +| 518 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report - 16298 | +| 519 | 9/29/03 | Pa Bea County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 520 | 12/1/03 | es lm Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 521 | 1/6 | est Palm Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 522 | 10/7 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 523 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 524 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 525 | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------| +| 526 | 12/26/06 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 527 | 4/28/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 528 | 9/12/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear; Delray Beach Police | +| 529 | 12/9/10 | Arrest Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 530 | 2/2/11 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | + +# - Pub' + +| 531 | 11/4/97 | ██████████ Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 97-002687 | | | | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 532 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-027604 | | | | +| 533 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-000343 | | | | +| 534 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 98-041883 | | | | +| 535 | N/D | In re Daniel Roberts III , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2000-GA-000718 - Docket | | | | +| 536 | 6/10/01 | ██████████ Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 01-002214 | | | | +| 537 | 8/3/01 | Royal Palm Beach Police Department Offense
Report Case No. 01-003008 | | | | +| 538 | 3/2/02 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
Affidavit; Greenacres Department of Public Safety
Report No. 42-02-14029 | | | | +| 539 | Misc. | State of Florida v. ██████████, 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-MMM-011621; Docket and Case Information | | | | +| 540 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report Case No. 02-075321 | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +J. and Paul Cassell v. Dershowitz 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-1500072 + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 541 | 1/6/15 | Complaint | | | | +| 542 | 4/8/16 | Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 543 | 4/8/16 | Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement | | | | +| | | | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 544 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, ██████ J. ██████ or any witnesses listed by either party | | | | +| 545 | | All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery and any documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits, in all matters identified herein | | | | +| 546 | | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 547 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 548 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 549 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 550 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 551 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 552 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 553 | | Any and all exhibits listed by ██████ J. ██████ (by identifying these as exhibits, Epstein is not waiving his right to object to any of ██████ exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] "Aimik + +Gs' + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 6029 + +Kara Berard Rocken c 44903) + +Primary: it lin ilk w m + +Primary: Ka aw com + +Secondary: nkrocklaw.com + +Second mkrocklaw.com + +Ti for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant tein + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counse

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4948950609ff4e4f7b2bc02a4bdc67698ba9848c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986/EFTA02767986.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1308 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02767986.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 35, + "chars": 160401, + "elapsed_seconds": 24.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E ' EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 133.416, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 478.8669128417969, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 478.8669128417969, + 342.363037109375 + ], + [ + 133.416, + 342.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B TI UN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 471.363037109375 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 471.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FBI Reports / Statements", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 378.824951171875, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 378.824951171875, + 227.60302734375 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 227.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 367.812, + 355.863037109375 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 355.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 5 2 -028051XXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 468.1493225097656, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 468.1493225097656, + 369.0635070800781 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 369.0635070800781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 412.6671142578125, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 412.6671142578125, + 157.10302734375 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 157.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 440.64, + 563.6030120849609 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 563.6030120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CVRA Co cations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 380.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 380.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- Pub'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 339.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 339.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 131 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 177 + ], + [ + "Line", + 86 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 91 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 188 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 182 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 205 + ], + [ + "Line", + 95 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02767986" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48b95b5452dd34ab98df79539e12af8e246be44a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.md @@ -0,0 +1,569 @@ +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and the trial of this matter. edures, identifies the witnesses he may call at 's Court's August 3, 2018, Order Setting + +- 1. do 425 N. An FoS;de + - Pottinger LLC Avenue, Suite 2 FL 33301-3268 +- 2. tt Roth.stein Nurik Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (by video deposition) +- 3. L Ackerman, Jr. Burnett 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFR# TRIAL WITNVST PSTEIN'S + +Co SA + +- 4. William J. Berger do Greenspoon Marder 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 11800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 5. Wayne Black do Wayne Black & Associates One Brickell Square 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33131 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 +- 6. Paul G. Cassell do Hatch, James & Dodge, P.C. +- 7. Robert D. Griffon, Jr. do Critton, Luther & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 = ASeS e t LINK & R0CKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boule ite 0 West Palm Beach, Florida 33 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2 + +By: is/ScottJ. Link + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale Searcy, D 2139 Palm West Palm B meoRlitarevlaw.com jsx@-seareylaw.com dvitale( scarcylaw.com scarolateam@searcvlaw.com terryteam®searcylaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintif J. Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. es Boulevard FL 33409 + +Scott J. Link 60 1) + +Kara Bera bach (FBN 44903) + +Primary: Icr klaw m + +Prima inkrocklaw.com + +S m + +STri iCounsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey + +#### SERVICE LIST + +Trov(alinkrocklaw.com + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njs@FLAppellateLaw.com kbteFLAppellateLaw.com Co-Counselor -Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## D. Culver 111 CURRICULUM VITAE + +CULVER III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 www.culversmithlaw.com + +ofc 561.598.6800 lax 561.598.6801 cell 561.301.3800 csmithgculverscnithlaw.com + +#### OCCUPATION/PROFESSION + +Lawyer and consultant + +Practice emphasis: Counseling and representation of lawyers, law firms, and others on-ethics, professional responsibility, professional disciplinary proceedings, sanctions, disqualification, unlicensed practice of law, malpractice, and loss prevention; service as expert witness in litigation involving such matters; conduct of ethics audits for law firms; counseling and representation of applicants for admission or reinstatement to the bar; counseling and representation of public officials and employees on ethics compliance and complaints; conduct of internal corporate investigations; service as special magistrate, arbitrator, and mediator; representation and consultation on appeals in all courts. More than forty-five years of experience in the field, as well as experience in law-firm management. + +#### EXPERIENCE 'S di 9 + +Counsel for respondents in hundreds of lawyeetattpli S' ry, unlicensed-practice-of-law, and baradmission proceedings, including appeals In the Supreme Court of Florida + +Representation in dozens of disqualific sanctions proceedings + +Testifying/consulting expert in nurtlerpus,cases involving lawyer ethics and professionalresponsibility issues + +Wide variety of civil litigation ind apipeals, including matters involving contracts, business torts, professional responsibility and malpractice, corporate and partnership relationships, officer and director liability, and, trust and estate disputes. + +#### EDUCATION AND LICENSING + +Bachelor of Arts, Washington and Lee University, 1964 + +Doctor of Jurisprudence, Washington and Lee University College of Law, 1969 (replaced LLB. conferred 1967) + +Admitted to practice in: + +Florida, 1967 + +California, 1972 (now inactive) + +U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida + +U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit + +#### PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY + +Law Clerk to Judge T. Shannon, Jr., and Judge Robert T. M, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, 1967-1968 (summarized briefs and records-on-appeal, researched law, drafted opinions) Associate, l=" Paine & S P.A., West Palm Beach, 1968 (associate in midsize law firm for four months before commencing active military duty; researched law, drafted pleadings and briefs, conducted depositions, and handled motion hearings) Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Naval Reserve, 1968-1972 (active duty as military lawyer: two years at Naval Law Center, San Diego, CA, prosecuting and defending courts-martial cases; two years as staff judge advocate at Naval Air Station Miramar ("Ffghtertown U.S.A."), San Diego, CA, advising commanding officer on wide variety of military and Civilian legal matters) Associate, John W. Dell, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1972-1974 (associate In small, general-practice law firm; handled various litigation and nonlitigation matters) Shareholder, Dell and P.A., West Palm Beach, 1974-1977 (shareholder in small, generalpractice law firm; handled various litigation matters, it iti ing personal-injury and commercial cases) Shareholder, =, Coogler, P.A., West Im Beach, 1977-1981 (shareholder in small-to-midsize insurance-defense firm; handled defense of personal-injury, product-liability, and professional-malpractice cases) Partner, Steel Hector & LLP, West Palm Beach, 1981-1991 (senior litigator in large, Miamibased law firm's West Palm Beach office; chaired office litigation department; recruited, trained, and supervised litigation associates and legal assistants; handled wide variety of complex civil business litigation, professional-malpractice cases, and probate litigation) Shareholder, =, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1992-1997 (shareholder in midsize general-practice law firm; handled wide variety of civil business litigation and probate litigation) Partner, Holland & Knight;LLP, West Palm Beach, 1997-2002 (senior litigator in international law firm's West Palm Beach office; handled wide variety of civil business litigation, probate litigation, and appeals; served as office Executive Partner, 1998-2002) Shareholder, D, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2002-2007 trial and appellate practice; -subst.intial focus on lawyer ethics and professional responsibility) Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm Beach, 2007-2010 (senior litigator in national law firm's West Palm Beach office) Shareholder, Culver Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2010—date (M legal and consulting practice; substantial focus on ethics, professional responsibility, and related matters; appellate representation and consultation) + +#### PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE + +The Florida Bar: + +Member, Board of Governors, 1984-1988 (Executive Committee, 1987-1988) + +Member, Professional Ethics Committee, 2001-2007,2010-2016 (Chairperson, 2004-2005, 2006-2007) + +Member, Vision 2016 Commission, 2013-2016 (Chairperson, MJP/Reciprocity- a e us Committee, Bar Admissions Subgroup, 2013-2016) + +Member, Standing Committee on Professionalism, 1989-1993, 2016—d e hairperson, 1989-1992) + +Member, Hawkins Commission on Discipline System, 2011-2012 + +Member, Special Committee to Review 2002 ABA Model RyF s, 02-2006 + +Member, Ethics 2000 Review Panel, 2001 + +Member, Law-Related Education Committee, 2007-4\ 0 1 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1987-1989,, 992-2001 (Chairperson, 1988-1989, 1993-1994) (author/editor of Meeting the Challenges: A Strategic Plan for the Florida Bar, 1993) + +Member, Special Committee to Study Composition of Board of Governors, 1996-1997 + +Vice Chairperson, Commission on Lawyer Professionalism, 1987-1989 (principal author of Florida Bar Ideals and Goals of Professionalism and Florida Lawyer's Creed of Professionalism (adopted 1990, superseded 2015)) + +Chairperson, Special Committee on Priorities for the 1990s, 1986-1987 + +Member, Special Committee to Study Reapportionment of the Board of Governors, 1986-1987 (author of The Florida Bar's answer and counterpetition in Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules lie luting the Florida Bar (Reapportionment), 518 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1987) (adopting Flo ' a roposed plan for apportionment of Board of Governors)) + +M , Pr gram Evaluation Committee, 1984-1988 (Chairperson, 1986-1988) + +Chair son, Special Study Committee on Lawyer Referral Services, 1985-1986 + +Member, Special Study Committee on Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 1983-1984 + +Member, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee, 1977-1980 (Chairperson, 1979-1980) + +Member, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, 1974-1979 + +Member, Trial Lawyers Section and Appellate Practice Section + +#### Palm Beach County Bar Association: + +President, 1982-1983 + +President-Elect, 1981-1982 + +Secretary, 1979-1981 + +Member, Board of Directors, 1977-1984 + +President, Young Lawyers Section, 1976-1977 + +Member, Professionalism Committee, 1990-1991, 2004-date (Co-Chair n, 2 -2012) + +Member,. & Small Firm Practitioners Committee, 2011-2012 + +Member, Judicial Campaign Practices Commission, 2002,2004,700 , 2012,2014, 2016 + +Member, Historical Committee, 2003-2009 (Chairperson,\_2003-2005,2006-2009) + +Member, Historic Courtroom Fundraising Committee, 2007-2008 + +Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1994-1996,2001-2002 + +Member, Revitalization of the Bar Committee, 1999-2000 + +Chairperson, Bulletin Editorial Committee, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Circuit Court Civil Practfetemmittee N , 1979 + +Chairperson, New Member Orietitition Committee, 1976-1977 + +Chairperson, Membership Comm 1974-1976 + +#### American College of Trial Law ters:\_,/ + +Fellow, 1996-date + +Membernlorida State Committee, 2004-2009 + +Member, Legal Ethics and Professionalism Committee (f/k/a Legal Ethics Committee), 1997- 2002,2005-2013 + +tik?frperson, 2008 Tri-State Meeting Committee, 2006-2008 + +#### Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers: + +Member, 2005—date + +Member, Program Committee, 2006, 2008-2010, 2014—date (Chairperson, 2008-2010) + +#### Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers: + +Charter member, 2009—date (member, Board of Directors, 2009—date) + +#### American Bar Association: + +Member, Center for Professional Responsibility + +Member, Section of Litigation + +#### The Florida Bar Foundation: + +Member, Board of Directors, 1988-1992 (Executive Committee, 1990-1 + +Member, Development Committee, 1995-1996,2000-2005 + +Member, Improvements in the Administration of Justice IOTA GrantEComdtittee, om ittee, 1992-1994, 1995-1997 + +Chairperson, Investment Committee, 1991-1992 + +Vice Chairperson, Law Student Assistance IOTA Grant Committee, 1990-1992 + +Member, Legal Assistance for the Poor IOTA GrantCoMmittee, 1988-1991 + +Chairperson, 2004 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +Member, Steering Committee, 2010 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign + +#### Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc. + +Member, Board of Directors, 2011-2016 + +#### Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc. + +Member, Board;of Directors, 2016—date + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Committee, 1992-1996 (Chairperson, 1994- 1995) ( + +Chairperson, Ad'Hoc Magistrate Selection Panel, United States District Court, Southern District of FloAfir1987 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Media Committee, 2005-2009 + +Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Indigent Services Committee, 2007-2008 + +#### PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1987 + +President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1994 + +Professionalism Award, Palm Beach County Bar Association, 2002 + +Outstanding Past Local Bar President, Florida Council of Bar Presidents, 2005 + +#### LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS + +"The Pink Elephant in the Office," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullets S per 2017, pp. 19, 22 + +"Earned Fees to Be Shared Between Counsel—Operating Account or T st Account?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2017, p. 5 + +"The New 'Florida Bar Professionalism Expectations'—What N Association Bulletin, January 2016, p. 5 lm Beach County Bar + +"The Monster in the Closet: Trust-Account Responsibilit " Bulletin, February 2015, p. 9 A each County Bar Association + +"'Unprofessional' Versus 'Unethical' (Caution: Itpnery toad Ahead)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2014, p. + +"The Supreme Court's New 'Code for Resolving fessionalism Complaints," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July/August 2013, p. 6 + +\ "Motions to Withdraw: Euphewnsrn on Parade," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2012, p. 11 ( k/ + +'Tribute to a Mentor," Palm Bettaitounty Bar Association Bulletin, April 2012, p. 10 + +"Can You Hear Me Nov?)ndSho Else Is Listening?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2011,-p. 19 + +Code of Pretrial and Trial Conduct Teaching Syllabus, American College of Trial Lawyers, Irvine, 2011 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Dance of the Lawyer Expert: What Ethical Issues and When?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, September 2010, p. 13 + +"Through the Looking M: When Is an 'Earned Retainer' Earned?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2009, p. 7 + +"Terminal One-Upmanship and Other Phenomena of the Lawyering Life," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2009, p. 7 + +"Threatening Disciplinary Proceedings: In the Mind of the Beholder?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2007, p. 13 + +"Outsourcing Legal Work: Smart Practice Management or Ethical Quagmire?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, April 2007, p. 13 + +"Lawyers' Ancillary Businesses," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, March 2007, p. 13 + +"The Adversary System: A Matter of Theology?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2006, p. 13 + +"Investigators Gone-: Who Pays the Tab in a Blame-the-Lawyers World?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2006, pp. 17-18 + +"Metadata: What Are the Ethical Implications?" Palm Beach County Bar Association-Bulletin, June 2006, p. 7 + +Chapter 1, "Theories of Liability," Professional Liability of Lawyers in Flori a th e ., the Florida Bar, Tallahassee, 2006, (also authored same chapter in earlier editions) + +"Business Transactions With a Client: Are You a Lawyer or an Entre ren Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2005, p. 17 + +"Identifying the Client: The First Line of Defense," Palm Bep Co Bar Association Bulletin, January 2005, pp. 15-16 + +"Confidentiality and the 'Snitch Rule': An Ethical C Bulletin, December 2004 Im Beach County Bar Association + +Report of the Legal Ethics Committee of the American College of Trial Lawyers on Duties of Confidentiality, American College of al Lawyers, Irvine, CA, 2001 (co-author/contributor) + +"The Bar Looks at the Future," The F Journal, vol. 71, no. 5, May 1997, p. 32 + +#### LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS + +"Professionalism Expectations and Contentious Cases;' at Palm Beach County Bar Association LLC Member Disputes seminar, West Palm Beach, June 16, 2017 + +"Professionalis%N)-at Palm Beach County Bar Association Modification of Parenting Plans: Seven Practical Tips Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 28, 2017 + +"Great ExPectations: Professionalism Expectations for Florida Lawyers," at The Florida Bar Putting the "ratio ifrofessionalism symposium, West Palm Beach, April 21, 2017 (panelist) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 2: Permissible Lawyer-Expert Testimony—What Can You Get Into Evidence?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, August 1, 2015 (moderator) + +"Expert Witnesses, Part 1," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Houston, February 7, 2015 (moderator) + +"Ethical Considerations: Your License Is in Play," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Spying Spouses: Divorce in a World of Cyber Warfare and E-Everything seminar, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2013 + +"The Tangled Web of Ethics, Advertising, Websites & Social Media," at The Florida Bar Family Law Section webinar, September 11, 2013 (panelist) + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With Lawyer-Referral and Legal Support Services," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 22, 2012 (including written materials) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, May 2, 2012 (panelist) + +"Ethics Workshop," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Islan bruary 10, 2012 (panelist) + +"The New Oath of Admission," at Florida Association for Women Lawyers Pal Chapter luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 9, 2011 (panelist) Act iCounty + +"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With For-Profit Referral and Legal-Sup s," at Palm Beach County Bar Association & Small Firm Practitioners luncheon, Im Beach, November 2, 2011 + +"Lawyer Ancillary Business: What Hat Are You Wearing Today—Lawyer or Entrepreneur?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meejir > Sianrancisco, August 6, 2010 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lormart-Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including written materials) + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including-Titten materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (includingventen materials) + +"Commercial Litigation," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Bench-Bar Conference, West Palm Beach, February 19, 2010 (panelist) + +"Ripped From the Case Er Corporate Internal Investigations, Multiple Representations, and U.S. v. Ruehle," at Arnerican'iBankruptcy Institute Caribbean Insolvency Symposium, Boca Raton, February 14291'.1(panelist and counsel for Appellee in mock oral argument) + +"Ethics an Pro The Rothstein Scandal & Beyond," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program Leadership luncheon Series, Coral Gables, January 26, 2010 (panelist) + +"Evidentiary Foundations and Objections," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Judicial Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 16, 2009 (moderator) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2009 (panelist) + +"Tanned, Rested, and Ready—Now What? The Practical Side of Expert-Witnessing," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, July 31, 2009 (moderator/panelist) + +Firm Counsel Project Roundtable, at American Bar Association National Legal Malpractice Conference, Miami, April 23, 2009 (moderator) + +"Opening Remarks," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, Deerfield Beach, February 18, 2009 + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2008 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Professionalism: How to Build Your Reputation & Keep Your License," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program seminar, Coral Gables, September 9, 2008 (panelist) + +"Trial and Pretrial Conduct on Paper and in Practice: A Cut Above the Ordinary," Aa q n cuit Bench & Bar Conference, Colorado Springs, September 5, 2008 (panelist) + +"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lorman Educational Service el , E ics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials'' + +"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics iri Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Leg4Ethics inFlorida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) 7 , + +Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judicial Campaign Conduct Forum, West Palm Beach, May 8, 2008 (panelist) + +"Leadership Through Service," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Leadership Academy—The Art of Leadership program, West Palm Beach, April 25, 2008 (panelist) + +What Tangled Webs We Weave: Conflicts of Interest in Trust & Estate Practice," at The Florida Bar Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section Trust & Estate Symposium: Litigating Under Florida's New Trust Code, Fort emir and Tampa, February 7 and 8, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at Pal Beach County Bar Association Professionalism Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beac , February 6, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigators (and Lawyers) Gone-: The Ethical Ramifications of Pretexting and Undercover Investigations," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Island, February 1, 2008 (including written materials) + +"Investigatad Lawyers) Gone-: The Ramifications of Covert and Deceptive Tactics," at National Association of Legal Investigators conference, Fort Lauderdale, January 25, 2008 + +"DealingWIth Difficult Opposing Counsel," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, December 3, 2007 (panelist) + +"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, FL, November 2, 2007 (panelist) + +"Ethics Shrugged: Supervising Outside Agents in a Blame-the-Lawyers World," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 29, 2007 (including written materials) + +"Dealing With Difficult Clients," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, FL, May 16, 2007 (panelist) + +"You Can't Always Say What You Want: Limits on Lawyer Speech Post-Fieger," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Miami Beach, February 9, 2007 (moderator/panelist) + +"Achieving Success in the Practice of Law: Lessons Learned in Thirty-Nine Years at the Bar," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Lunch With the Legends Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2006 + +"Ethical Concerns Regarding Attorneys' Ancillary Businesses," at The Florida Bar Masters', Seminar on Ethics, Boca Raton, June 23, 2006 (including written materials) ("Masters Seminaergo rni l thics") + +"Conflicts of Interest," at American College of Trial Lawyers Current Developmen Civil Procedure, Evidence and Legal Ethics seminar, Hollywood, April 6, 2006 (including terials) + +"Conflicts of Interest," at CLE International Ethics seminar, Tampa, Febr 6 (including written materials) + +) "Update on the New Rules of Professional Conduct," at Palm Beach County-Bar Association 14th Annual Professionalism Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 8, 2.005`(1 A + +"Final Arguments," at National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA), m 2 erican College of Trial Lawyers, and Florida Legal Services, Inc., Critical Trial Skills for Legal Services Attorneys seminar, Deerfield Beach, January 3-6, 2005 (faculty member) + +"Ethics & the Unauthorized Practice of Law: How Paralegals Are Affected," at Paralegal Association of Florida 26th Annual Meeting & Seminar, West Palm Beach, September 20, 2002 + +"Avoiding Legal Malpractice," at Professional Education Systems Institute The Briar Potch: Thorny Issues in Florida Civil Litigation seminar, Dania, August 20, 2002 (including written materials) + +"Avoiding Malpractice," at PalniBeich County Bar Association Family Law seminar, West Palm Beach, December 8, 2000( V + +"Ethical Challenges Facing Today's dttorney," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 9th Annual Ethics and Professionalism Workshop and Seminar, West Palm Beach, May 31, 2000 + +"Applied Ethics," at the Palm Beach County Bar Association North County Section Ethics Seminar and Luncheon, North Palm Beach, May 26, 1999 + +"Avoiding aloractiee Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP. and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, Wes Beach, January 15, 1999 + +"AveferirMalpractice Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, West Palm Beach, November 5, 1997 + +Palm Beach County Bar Association A Study in Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, April 29, 1996 (panelist) + +"Ethics and Malpractice," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 4th Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, June 2, 1995 + +"Making the Standards of Professionalism Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 3rd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 18, 1993 + +"Jury System—New Approaches," at American Inns of Court chapter meeting, West Palm Beach, February 11,1993 (panelist) + +"Professionalism in Litigation Practice Outside the Courtroom," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 2nd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 28,1992 + +"Making the Standards Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 1st Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, March 22,1991 + +ii "Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at Nova Southeastern University School of Law ri tation assembly, Fort Lauderdale, August 16,1990 + +"Conversations on Professionalism," at Rumger Professional Issues Forum, Or c 7l ) anuary 1990 (panelist) + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly admitted arid awyers, West Palm Beach, October 30,1987 + +"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly acknifftitl Florida lawyers, West Palm - \ Beach, May 31,1985 + +"The Bar and Its Works," at West Palm Beach Rotary Club luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 7,1985 + +#### CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE + +Member, Board of Directors, Hanley Centertx idatrUn, Inc. (d/b/a Hanley Foundation), 2013—date (Treasurer, 2015—date) + +Member, Board of Directors, Educatfbn F ration of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1986-2009 (President, 1989-1991,19924995k; Chairperson, 2002-2003; Honorary Co-Chairperson, 25th Anniversary Spirit of Youti(Awards ()Inner, February 19, 2009) + +Member, State Board of Directors, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2005-2008 (Member, Governance Committee, 2007-2008) + +Member, Division Advisory Board, South Coastal Division, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2002-2011 (Chairperson, Bylaws Committee, 2007-2010; Co-Chairperson, Fund Development Committee, 2010-2011) + +Member, Picardie( Directors, Nelle Residence for Girls, Inc., 1982-1989,1997-2009 Oresident, 1986-1988,1997-2000,2002-2009) + +Member, Roger Stadium Advisory Board, 2002—date (Chairperson, 2013-2014) + +Member, Board of Directors, Greater West Palm Beach Division, Florida/Puerto Rico Affiliate, American Heart Association, 2001-2003 + +Member, Economic Council of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1988-2002 (Member, Education Committee, 1989-1992, 1994-1998; Member, Executive Committee, 1994-1995; Member, Task Force on the Florida Constitution, 1997-1998; Member, Strategic Action Committee, 2000-2002) + +Co-Chairperson, Steering Committee, Principals Leadership Training Institute (joint project of the School Board of Palm Beach County and the Education Foundation of Palm Beach County), 2003-2004 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Candidates Citizens Interview Committee, 1995 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Strategic Planning Committee, 1988-1992 Member, Palm Beach County Court Facilities Planning Committee, 1986-1987 Member, Coordinating Committee, Project Mosaic (community-wide collaboration to develop strategies for achieving stable racial balance in Palm Beach County's public schools), 1989-1991 Member, Steering Committee, Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Qualifications Forum, 1995 -- Member, Palm Beach County Champions, WorldClass Schools, 1995-1999 (Chairperson, 1995-1997) Member, Campaign Cabinet, United Way of Palm Beach County, Inc , 2001-2002 Member, Board of Directors, Zoological Society of the Palm Beaches,Inc., 1970s Member, Board of Directors, Legal Aid Society of Palm BeacliCroUnty, 1981-1990 , Member, Board of Directors, YMCA of the Palm Beaches, Inc., 1983-1986 Member, Society for American Baseball Research (SABR), 1997—date (Co-Chairperson, Host Committee, 2000 Annual Convention Sustaining member, Friends of the LFBIne (National Baseball ■ **of Fame and Museum, Inc.), 1999—date Member, Board of Directors, ect Park/Southland Park Homeowners Association, 1987- 1988 Member, Palm Beach Comer, Washington and Lee University Alumni Association (Chairperson, 1985-1990)** + +# **MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS** + +**I , "The Inquisitor General," Palm Beach Post, February 22,2010, p. A13 (op-ed.) "SticklersUnite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 3)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2009, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 2)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2008, p. 16 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 1)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2008, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Save Only, the Lonely!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2008, p.17** + +"Sticklers Unite! Ban Verbing the Noun!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2008. pp. 11, 21 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Semicolonitis!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2007, p. 17 + +"Sticklers Unite! Save the Apostrophe!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2007, p. 18 + +"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Death by Comma!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bullgin, March 2007, pp. 18-19 + +From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society fo-rarberican Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000 (editor) + +"From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Spring Home to Record-Setters," From MCGillicdgdy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 3-5 + +"All-Time Florida-Born Major League Baseball Team," From McGillkuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseba litesr, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 15-16 + +#### MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS + +"Public Education: The Lifeblood of Democracy," Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Spirit of Youth Awards dinner, West Palm Beach, January 30, 2003 + +"Citizenship and the Search for Justice," given at Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Week luncheon, Palm Beach, September 16, 1996 + +"The Future of Public Education," given at Sun-Sentinel "The '90s: Palm Beach County Faces the Future" forum, Lake Worth, May 15;1990 + +#### PERSONAL + +- -77 Born and reared in West Palm Beach, Florida (fourth-generation resident) + +Married to Dr. Donna Marks; two children, two grandchildren, three stepchildren, and three step-grandchildren + +Hobbies and interests: + +'Baseball—past, present, and future + +Piano + +Lexicology, syntax, and writing style \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8a0d5a2cab98df08325f7ef3fb333f5f42b6e01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021/EFTA02768021.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1462 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768021.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 22, + "chars": 38393, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 539.172, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFR# \nTRIAL WITNVST \nPSTEIN'S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 437.994873046875, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 437.994873046875, + 369.363037109375 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 369.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPEfkri ESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 362.89056396484375, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 362.89056396484375, + 403.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 403.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 141.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 141.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 472.863037109375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 472.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Culver 111 \nCURRICULUM VITAE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6950378417969, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6950378417969, + 70.33056640625 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 70.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCCUPATION/PROFESSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 186.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERIENCE 'S di 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 363.7926330566406, + 372.570556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 372.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION AND LICENSING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.69650268554688, + 542.8305816650391 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 542.8305816650391 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 254.9603729248047, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 135.45416259765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 135.45416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Palm Beach County Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 116.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 116.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American College of Trial Law ters:_,/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.59518432617188, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 609.4540710449219 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 609.4540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 687.0840835571289 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 687.0840835571289 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 135.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 135.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Foundation:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 213.4541015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 213.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th Anniversary Committee, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 420.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 420.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 279.2540588378906, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 232.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 232.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRCNTA ONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 456.03 + ], + [ + 289.0795593261719, + 470.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 470.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.01292419433594, + 384.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 384.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS ARTI ?SUS AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 498.532958984375 + ], + [ + 289.7206115722656, + 498.532958984375 + ], + [ + 289.7206115722656, + 549.3151702880859 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 549.3151702880859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 365.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 365.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 496.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 496.9540710449219 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768021" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b135b6e0b55c09dfeab33d46e64e9b1b501ca270 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.md @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Ht. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +"S. + +SCOTT ROTI (STEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +CO SA + +# MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EX ir cA b)WITNESS LIST FILED OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN CONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEAD IT + +'grid counsel, hereby files this Motion to t Filed October 5, 2018 and to, Once Again, grounds therefor states as follows: J. Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Exhibit and Confirm Existing Pre-Trial Dea + +- er, this Court has been crystal clear: discovery in this case +- 1. In issuing order is closed and the time to d xhibit and/or witness lists has long since passed. +- 2. S tally, on July 20, 2017, the Court entered an Order specially setting the case for trial • ✓ r 2017 and outlining the deadlines for all pre-trial preparations. ► Pursuant to that Order, discovery closed on November 25, 2017. And, although Jeffrey Epstein has repeatedly sought to reopen discovery, the Court has ruled time and again that discovery in this decade-old case is closed. +- 4. In fact, after Epstein secured a last-minute continuance of the December 2017 trial date, and the case was reset for trial to March 2018, Epstein took the position that the pre-trial + +deadlines were extended, discovery could be reopened, and new witnesses and/or exhibits could be late-disclosed. The Court, however, disagreed and on November 27, 2017, entered its Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines and Regarding Pretrial Stipulation, in which the Court granted motion and confirmed all existing deadlines in the ourt's July 20, 2017 order.' + +5. Undeterred, Epstein sought time and again to either I very, amend witness lists, or to piecemeal disclose individual exhibits in the w g up to the March 2018 trial date that he contended were part of general, catch-al eV t categories in his November 2017 Exhibit List (despite the Court's order mandating t h(0.1 catch-all categories would be permitted). \ + +6. For example, Epstein sou So laire a purported expert witness, Skip Esq., in violation of the Court's 0, 2 17 and November 27, 2017 orders. + +7. The Court, howev Denying Epstein's Motion for ve o Disclose Expert Witness.' that request and on January 17, 2018 entered its Order + +8. Thereafter, ruary 6, 2018, was forced to file a General Objection to All Composite E due to Epstein's attempt to circumvent the Court's prohibition on general, catch-all c gorics through the piecemeal disclosure of exhibits in the weeks leading up to trial. + +I A copy of the Court's Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines and Regarding Pretrial Stipulation is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. + +2 A copy of the Court's Order Denying PlaintifECounter-Defendant's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness is attached hereto as Exhibit 'B'. + +9. And, finally, on the eve of trial, Epstein sought to disclose hundreds of new exhibits on his March 5, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List, including dozens that were privileged materials and that Epstein had obtained in violation of a federal bankruptcy order. The Court struck all of these late-disclosed exhibits at the final pre-trial hearing before the March 2018 rial date. + +10. However, Epstein was able to avoid that March 2018 trial date u hypertechnical Rule 1.440 argument (despite having previously represen o additional continuances would be sought), which resulted in an emergency stay • eedings by order of the Fourth DCA. + +11. After the appellate stay was lifted, Edwar tely sought to have a new trial urt yet again to allow amendments g of his Motion to Allow Amendment of Amendment to Exhibit List and his Renewed date set for this 2009 case. In the interim, Epstein to the parties' exhibit and witness list throu Exhibit List and Supplement to Motio Motion to Disclose Expert Witn filed Responses in Opposition to both motions, and the Court has yet to hear or rul those issues. + +12. At an Au g, the Court stated that it would set a trial date for some time at the end of the y + +13 ugust 3, 2018, the Court entered an order specially-setting this case, number 1, for a day trial beginning on December 4, 2018. In doing so, the Court simply used its standard, form pre-trial order, which contains near identical language to the July 20, 2017 Order that the parties have been operating under for over a year (and that the Court has expressly refused to vacate in the past)? + +3 A copy of the Court's August 3, 2018 Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 'C'. + +14. has understood this Court's repeated rulings over the past year to be clear: discovery is closed. Witness lists have been served. Exhibit Lists have been served. Objections have been filed. The time to reopen discovery, list new witnesses (such as Epstein's attempt to list Skip as an expert despite the Court's January 17, 2018 order denying that very uest), and further delay this case is over. Thus, did not, and does not, believe that ' August 3, 2018 order operates to vacate the repeated orders the Court previously firming pretrial deadlines and that discovery was closed. As a general rule, a c urt d not silently vacate past orders. Moreover, Epstein's renewed motions as to these emained pending. + +15. Yet, on October 5, 2018, Epstein filed h' Exhibit List and Amended Witness List. + +16. Epstein's Amended Exhibit 1.; 222 new numbered exhibits'', including ten (10) general, catch-all categories rte e Court having repeatedly ordered no such categories are permitted. See ca large portion of these exhibits l e en publicly available for years. through 533, labelled "General." It appears that a + +17. Epstein's ded Witness List also improperly lists Skip Esq. as a purported expert is case, despite the Court having denied Epstein's prior attempt to latedisclose t . Notably, apparently still has not reached any final opinions, even though t as en nearly a year since he was first retained. + +Epstein's October 5, 2018 Amended Exhibit List contains 553 numbered exhibits, while Epstein's November 16, 2017 Exhibit List contains 331 numbered exhibits. + +18. Both Epstein and filed their Exhibit and Witness Lists in November/December 2017, and since that time the Court has made clear, time and again, that discovery is closed and that this decade-old case is ready for trial. These are the exhibit and witness lists that both parties declared they were ready to try the case with in March 2018. In ct, Epstein repeatedly represented to the Corut that he was ready for trial. The parties sho to their word, and respectfully requests that the Court strike Epstein's Witness and Exhibit Lists filed October 5, 2018 and re-confirm its November order: discovery is closed, witness and exhibit lists are closed, and this case is go' rial on December 4, 2018. + +# Conclusion + +For the foregoing reasons, the Court sho d Edwards' Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List Filed Oc r 8 and to, Once Again, Confirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines. Epstein should n tied to add 222 new numbered exhibits new witnesses, and a purported ex that the Court has already ruled may not be latedisclosed. The time has come f to finally hear claim. + +WHEREFORE, E respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order granting this Motion to Strike e y Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List Filed October 5, 2018 and to, Once Again, Conti Ex sting Pre-Trial Deadlines as requested herein. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List Filed October 5, 2018 and to, Once Again, Confirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 10th day of October, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney &Mails: "sx earc law. romccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: \_scarolat .com + +Searcy Denney Scarola Bamh , ipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes ard + +West Palm Beach, Fl + +Phone: (561) 68 + +Fax: 561-383- + +Attorneys for t (s\ + +Case No. 502009CA04080O00IXMBAG + +Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List Filed October 5, 2018 and to, Once Again, Confirm Existing Pre-Trial Deadlines + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Scott©Iinkrocklaw.com + +Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +Suite 301 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: 561-727-3600 + +Fax: 561-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 "S C) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-659-8300 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +AiDt?arS' + +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +i teLaw.com njs©FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire + +Burlington & Rockenbach, P. + +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite + +West Palm Beach, FL 3301 + +Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for Brad J. + +J. + +staff.efil toj tice.com + +425 N enue, Suite 2 + +Fort Lau ,FL 33301 + +Phone: (95 524-2820 + +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +### ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES + +AND RE PRETRIAL STATUTIONS ② + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon ██████ J. ██████' MOTION TO +RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and +being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Than the motion is granted to the +thene than the wholesale additional discovery will not be +permitted but indomited discovery requests may be allowed on a \* + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27 + +day of Nov., 2017. + +![]()\* matter by matter basis and only if the discovery requests are +regrated by the court's rulings on motions currently + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +pending to be heard on Nov. 29, Dec. 6 & 7, \*\* '17. Formal pre- +trial statution shall be prepared and filed no later than +~~June~~ December 15, '17. ② + +██████ s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ J. ██████ + +██████ J. ██████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. ██████ + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA0-10800XXXXM BAG Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines + +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Go + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### ORDER CHOIN-T-ING/DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court dKhearing on January 17, 2018, upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstei Witness. The Court, having reviewe otherwise advised in the premi tein") Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert ton, having heard argument of counsel, and being + +ORDERED AND JUDGED that the Motion is GRANTE cC'A lieler.-4-a-17 itt ', Cu, + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm ach o nty, Florida this /7day of January, 2018. + +> THE HONO ONALD W. HAFELE CIRCUIT C GE + +### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33401
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████████

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Angela M. Many
Link & Ro

| + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, , individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). + +#### ,^ ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES + +# I. SCHEDULING + +THIS CAUSE came before Burt on Defendant, J. ', Notice for Trial of B ' Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein and the court being,d se fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +( A' ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 4, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., (1O days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 2O5 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 334O1. + +# II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. + +# Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the parties shall provide: + - I. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + - 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; atid + - 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. +- D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL the parties shall confer and: + - 1. discuss settlement; + - 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; + - 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; and + - 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. +- E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It be the duty of counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all parties, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties arc charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + - I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubert Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. + - 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; + - 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; + - 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 6. a statement of estimated trial time; + - 7. names of attorneys to try case; and + - 8. number of peremptory challenges per party. + +# Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pm-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. +- G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the,expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. +- H. DISCOVERY. Unless otherwise agreed in the Pre-Trial Stipulation, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR CALENDAR CALL absent agreement for later discovery specifically stated in the Pm-Trial Stipulation or for other good cause shown. +- I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and, prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than 5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pretrial conference. +- J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to calendar call, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +- K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +- L. PREMARKING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. + +M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. No later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than 10 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than calendar call, each party shall serve his, her or its objections,to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +# III. MEDIATION + +- O eS A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + - I. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and re resebtatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. + - 2. At least ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. + - 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. + - 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it'shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), unless waived. +- B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (f), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall be paid \$175.00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. +- C. Completion of mediation prior to calendar call is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate in mediation, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings may be stricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. +- D. Any party opposing mediation may proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1,700(b). + +# IV. NONCOMPLIANCE + +NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING OF THE CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER SANCTIONS AS ARE JUST. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Floriikkis 3rd day of August, 2018. + +![](_page_16_Picture_4.jpeg) + +# Copies furnished to: + +JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +- **Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.aar) 1,7 James** (brad@epttscorq +- Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com) +- John Scarola Lscarolateamdtgodylaw.com) L ACKERM fre- KARA BERARD BOCK BACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAW.COM) +- Kara Berard R k bach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) KAREN E ERRy (.\_TERRYTEAM©SEARCYLAW.COM) +- Kare Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) +- Maria 'chian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp©law.utah.edu) PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) + +#### Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- F.7 Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmail.com) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COlvI) +- service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrialcom) I70 William Bennett. (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- William B. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) fro Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com) Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com) +- John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com) g David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@searcylaw.com) CO +- James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com) fre Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com) NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com) AR ) +- Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) fr, John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) F7 Jack A Goldberger agoldberger@agwpa.c Pro Andrew A Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.com 5-0 David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com F.% NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@fla pellatt.com) +- **Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw. ) Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) (staff.effle@pathtojustice.com)** +- **Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com)** +- **Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com)** ✓ Kara Berm\ fRocIcenbach (troy@linkrocklaw.com) P David Vitale Jr. (vitaleteam@searcylaw.com) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aeeceb7e0039b062967a437ecfd7a2cc13010ce1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/EFTA02768043.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1190 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 18, + "chars": 28597, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.84, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_16_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nHt. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 536.0209350585938, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 536.0209350585938, + 112.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EX ir cA b)WITNESS LIST FILED \nOCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN CONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL \nDEAD IT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.784, + 290.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 532.025390625, + 290.9056396484375 + ], + [ + 532.025390625, + 373.75042724609375 + ], + [ + 80.784, + 373.75042724609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 337.38726806640625, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 337.38726806640625, + 340.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 340.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 119.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 119.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 46.980000000000004 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 46.980000000000004 + ], + [ + 326.196, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 60.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.352, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 509.79599999999994, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 89.352, + 370.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 197.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"B\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.144, + 36.96331787109375 + ], + [ + 336.97637939453125, + 36.96331787109375 + ], + [ + 336.97637939453125, + 53.3994140625 + ], + [ + 252.144, + 53.3994140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER CHOIN-T-ING/DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 501.64715576171875, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 501.64715576171875, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 101.59200000000001, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.652, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 348.4582824707031, + 155.60302734375 + ], + [ + 257.652, + 155.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT \"C\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 32.3419189453125 + ], + [ + 308.51953125, + 32.3419189453125 + ], + [ + 308.51953125, + 49.76593017578125 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 49.76593017578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 481.032, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 481.032, + 121.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 121.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ",^ \nORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND \nDIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 316.8515625 + ], + [ + 464.5094299316406, + 316.8515625 + ], + [ + 464.5094299316406, + 354.7230224609375 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 354.7230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. SCHEDULING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 160.95600000000002, + 382.10302734375 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 382.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 287.9735107421875, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 287.9735107421875, + 549.35302734375 + ], + [ + 61.81200000000001, + 549.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 425.95199999999994, + 95.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 95.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.72799999999995, + 94.10302734375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 94.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 259.10302734375 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 259.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NONCOMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 202.46820068359375, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 202.46820068359375, + 136.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 136.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 173.90780639648438, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 173.90780639648438, + 382.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 382.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures \nCase No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.9874267578125, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.9874267578125, + 107.070556640625 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 107.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768043" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/_page_16_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/_page_16_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0ab652d4f39edab8b1b9e7021bd7a6a32d652c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768043/_page_16_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ff157e5003e00f8e3275e3aaf2e00128db51de7ae2a8649a0b61c958b4ebeda7 +size 12227 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bb60eddf3a9fa4972def4f0e9b802b03ff27ee8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.md @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. and L.M., Individually , Individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFF DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF,rBRXDLEY J. GENERAL INTERROGATORIES U T3D SEPTEMBER 16. 2010 FIN'S OBJECTIONS TO + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffr Epslirt, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Rules vt rocedure, files his objections to the General Interrogatories of Defendant/Co ntiff, J. and would state as follows: + +- 1. With regart Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects cause e interrogatories seek irrelevant information, are burdensome, are propounded for ose of harassment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Mild wt of the United States Constitution. +- 2. \ With regard to Interrogatories 10, 11, and 16, the interrogatories seek information that is irrelevant, burdensome to produce, and unlikely to lead to discoverable information. + +3. With regard to Interrogatory No. 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru, and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via O Email, O Facsimile, 0t.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Fed -ENess this irr-day of October, 2010 to: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A CO Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South 4 Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +4 9 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 FL Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By J ph 'L. Ackerh5an, Jr. a. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff' Counter-defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59e3491fe14597585ca045c28c6ab10a26de6f50 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061/EFTA02768061.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768061.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2212, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.426, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.304, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.304, + 140.22802734375 + ], + [ + 314.426, + 140.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFF \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF,rBRXDLEY J. \nGENERAL INTERROGATORIES U T3D SEPTEMBER 16. 2010 \nFIN'S OBJECTIONS TO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 517.4932250976562, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 517.4932250976562, + 386.988037109375 + ], + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 386.988037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 173.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 381.770263671875, + 173.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 381.770263671875, + 187.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 187.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768061" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8561fbd735d0a9a90c70c590db1ecdc454273d8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800X3COIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE NSES AND OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO ON DUCES TECUM + +Go + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste' % p , pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1350(b), responds and ob. to Duces Tecum contained in Counter-Plaintiff r 26, 2018, Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces Tecum, and states': + +# ORIGINAL DUCES TECUM + +(o 4C4 a1 Duces Tecum sought: + +A\...r ommunications and all records relating to all communications ceming or containing information derived from documents or ata over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of 1 M. + +&#x27;Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.350 (30 days) and Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.514(b) (5 days), Epstein's Response is due on October 31, 2018. However, in the spirit of cooperation, Epstein has served his response in advance of his October 13, 2018, deposition. + +• "Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phonorecords, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, A PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/ transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools t protocols. + +On July 18, 2018, Epstein objected to the Duces Tecum on th 0 thc Court has not reopened document discovery and because the request sought is that are protected by the attorney-client privilege, (2) documents that have n and (3) access to Epstein's computers and electronic devices. Epstein also poipIt i t1Cat Epstein's deposition was limited in scope to the following topics: + +- Whether and to what t n reviewed any of the alleged privileged materia arch 2018. +- Whether and privileged m ent Epstein reviewed any of the alleged after March 2018. +- Whethe in has any knowledge regarding compliance with Co verbal rulings on the record at the March 8 2018, ng regarding destruction of those documents has are privileged. hether and to what extent Epstein has shared any of the alleged privileged materials with anyone other than his attorneys. Which, if any, of the alleged privileged materials Epstein plans to use to testify at trial. + +Epstein reincorporates without restating his July 18, 2018, objection. + +# SEPTEMBER 26, 2018, DUCES TECUM + +Epstein's July 18, 2018, objections were heard on August 15, 2018, at which time, the Court allowed to narrow his document request to correspond with the deposition topics. On September 26, 2018, filed a new Duces Tecum seeking the following documents: + +All documents\* tending to establish: + +- Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of the alleg privileged materials prior to March 2018. +- Whether and to what extent Epstein reviewed any of jh privileged materials after March 2018. +- Whether Epstein has any knowledge regard' mp lance with the Court's verbal rulings on the records arch 8 2018, hearing regarding destruction of those, claimed are privileged. +- Whether and to what extent E privileged materials with ME has ared any of the alleged r than his attorneys. + +• "Documents" shall inc copies of writings, records, recordin information can whom the reasonabl data as inve. vies of be limited to all non-identical phs, charts, photographs, phony other data compilations from which , translated, if necessary, by the party to directed through detection devices into usable rm. "Documents" also include all electronic application metadata and system metadata. All d rosters of your information technology (IT) s 5—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, ÷ laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or mission features), programs, data maps and security tools and rotocols. + +### EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION + +### General Response. + +Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach, PA, received the disc which is the subject of Epstein's deposition from Epstein's former counsel, M, in February 2018. Epstein never received the disc nor did he know of the disc's existence before that ti . + +At the March 8, 2018 hearing, this Court directed the parties to seal th and nsure no further dissemination of the documents claimed were privile Rockenbach, PA, took immediate steps to comply with this Court's March 8, 20 di tives as set forth in Epstein's Notices of Compliance. The disc has been sea privilege claims are currently the subject of Epstein's request that the Co u, \ c an in camera review to make a determination as to whether the documents are p ' 'it claimed by + +# B. Specific Response + +?S' Epstein objects to the first t int requests because they seek documents that are protected by the attorney-client nd work product doctrine. Epstein does not have any non-privileged documents in res e to the first three requests. Epstein, however, is producing evidence of his cou el's ei t of the disc. + +In rest e fourth bullet point, Epstein states that no responsive documents exist because h hare the alleged privilege materials with anyone other than his attorneys. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 12, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fa] + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kam Berard Rockenbac 44903) Primary: Scott@linlfock .m Primary: Kara@lin eklw.com Secondary: T. lirikrcalaw.corn Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +Cou rater-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +### SER + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vital; Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, B ey, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boul and West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcylaw.com jsxOsearcylaw.co njsOFLAppellateLaw.com dvitale@searcyl om kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com scarolateam • re .com Co-Counselor iendant/Counter-Plaintiff te i ears aw.com J. Co-Cou fendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brad ards + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com + +wards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@eplIc.com Co-Counselor De J. + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f30003049b41540d128b9c78bd9e3aee0b83c559 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063/EFTA02768063.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,425 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768063.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 9269, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE \nNSES AND OBJECTIONS \nTO NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO ON DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.68, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 527.5510864257812, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 527.5510864257812, + 369.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.68, + 369.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORIGINAL DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 418.55352783203125, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 418.55352783203125, + 505.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 505.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEPTEMBER 26, 2018, DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 449.67156982421875, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 449.67156982421875, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 424.16510009765625, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 424.16510009765625, + 100.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 187.88400000000001, + 100.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Response.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 113.14501953125 + ], + [ + 206.43553161621094, + 113.14501953125 + ], + [ + 206.43553161621094, + 127.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 127.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Specific Response", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 202.15753173828125, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 202.15753173828125, + 404.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 404.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.520263671875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 390.363037109375 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 390.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768063" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df20cdb9b2048967188122d5011bada5cbd4eefd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 2009CA04080030:XXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. ,individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +Plaintiff,M Unavailability as follows: gh his undersigned counsel, files this Notice of + +December 24, C8 through and including January 1, 2019. + +l eillY + +Sr respectfully requests that no hearings be set, depositions be scheduled, discov nor other matters undertaken in the above-styled case during the time set forth. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Unavailability + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 1st day of October, 2018. + +![]()[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Unavailability + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Scott J. Link, Esq. +Kara Rockenbach, Esq. +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +[Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +[Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: 561-727-3600 +Fax: 561-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +[jgoldberger@agwpa.com](mailto:jgoldberger@agwpa.com); [smahoney@agwpa.com](mailto:smahoney@agwpa.com) +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com); [kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire +[staff.efile@pathtojustice.com](mailto:staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e944d39a508979519123b5e18f3bd63f209bea2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069/EFTA02768069.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768069.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2082, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 510.408, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 510.408, + 142.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 314.56800000000004, + 142.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 394.74, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 394.74, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 376.65000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 153.89999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768069" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd31c7955cd9e31f2c004b90ece83e2fbb58fd98 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.md @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOC(MBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +VS. + +MEJ. L.M., individually, , individually, and + +Plaintiff(s), + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, + +following: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFTEDAc8Sondersigned , has called up for hearing the + +DATE: October 31.2018 + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF + +TIME: 8:45 am. + +JUDGE: Honorable Hafele + +PLACE: 20f c Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 yy + +ROOM #: + +0 SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD: + +14/ .) + +MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LISTS FILED OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN, CONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES [filed 10.10.18] + +[REDACTED]'s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +  ✓   + +*Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +*Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +*One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this   18th day of   October, 2018. + +  JACK SCAROLA   + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Attorney E-Mail: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) + +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Hearing + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"1f you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Ad Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +c") + +Rey: 8/20/15 + +b..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c63b531baa9c950f7a2322b68b770ab9c5513fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072/EFTA02768072.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768072.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5283, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 366.10247802734375 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 366.10247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 147.42000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768072" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1db8c2c67ec51ab1b40a1a1055c5c6430c922a9c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. and L M, individually, Defendant(s). individually, + +### NOTICE TO COUNSEL OF RECORij + +04 + +THE COURT hereby notices counsel of record o ed request to videotape the upcoming trial in this matter. Please review the attac e any objection to same within ten (10) days from the date of this order and setv on or an 8:45 uniform motion calendar hearing no later than twenty (20) days from t atelf the Objection. + +DONE AND ORDERED i ers, at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 26th day of OctoberC8) .- + +![](_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +- Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) fro James (brad@epllc.com) +- Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com) +- John Scarola (\_scarolateam@searcylaw.com) p- L ACKERMAN. JR ( } + +### Notice of Filing Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- r7 KARA GERARD ROCKENBACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAVV.COM) 17 Kara Berard Rockenbach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) 17 KAREN E TERRY (\_TERRYTEAMeSEAP,CYLAW.COM) +- Karen Elizabeth Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) +- Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) +- Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) 17 Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) +- PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp@law.utah.edu) +- PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FI.APPELLATELAW.COM) k7 RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) +- Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmail.com) +- SCOTT LINK (SCOT f@LINKROCKLAW.COM) +- service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrial. 17 William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) 17 William B. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) +- Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation. ir; Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@lin o kl f7 John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.eo Fro David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@sea 17 James B Chaplin (efile@med tionfi(nifnc.com) 17 Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling onjahaddad.com) +- NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com) f7 Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) 17 John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) +- Jack A Goldberger (goldberger@agwpa.com) +- Andrew A Harris Qrh@flappellatelaw.com) 17 David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com) 17 NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com) +- Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com) 17 Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) P (staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) 17 Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com) 17 Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (troy@linkrocklaw.com) David P. Vitale Jr. (vitaleteam@searcylaw.com) + +04 + +## Denise Van Vooren + +From: Debra Oats Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 3:40 PM To: Denise Van Vooren Subject: FW: CONVERSATION THIS WEEK RE: DECEMBER 4TH TRIAL t J. V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN) + +Hi Denise, + +The below request to film your upcoming trial, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and J. =0, Case number 2015-CA-040800, is from an outlet called Radical Media. In reviewing their website, they appear to be a legitimate news/media group. A tir + +Please let me know if Judge Hafele approves this request. If approved, the only objection lw Acitlt,make deals with their request for two cameras and to any additional microphones on counsel tables and/or th Ben '46) . 777 + +Debra + +C + +From: Dave < > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:29 PM c To: Debra Oats Cc: osborne@radicalmedia.com Subject: CONVERSATION THIS WEEK RE: DECEMBER 4TH TRIA \L J. V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN) + +.7" + +Dear Ms. Oats, + +It was great speaking with you this week - thank you for taking the time to answer all my questions! + +As we discussed, director Joe Berlinger and RadicalMedia are re ue in that the Palm Beach County Circuit Civil Court grant us video camera access to the upcoming trial of J. v. Jeffrey Epstein, scheduled to begin on Tuesday, December 4th, 2018 at 9:30 am. + +We understand that this access would mean RadicalMedia is responsible for the trial's pool camera in the event other news organizations want to record the proceedings, and we would fulfill this responsibility, along with providing a distribution box for other media to have access to video and audio recordings, as required by court rules. + +We seek to operate the camera on every day of the trial, recording all the gavel to gavel testimony and courtroom activity: + +This footage is for a documentary series about Jeffrey Epstein and the people involved in litigation related to him. + +The series is to be directed by Oscar nominee and Emmy-winning filmmaker Joe Berlinger, and produced by RadicalMedia. + +News reports often just use a few minutes of audio and video from the courtroom to highlight the day's story. In contrast, we will be producing four one-hour episodes that will rely heavily on courtroom footage using key facts and testimony from the trial to tell an in-depth story. + +To ensure a smooth operation, we request five seats: two for two camera operators, one for a sound engineer, one for a producer/director and one for an associate producer/production assistant. Please be assured our staff will follow courtroom protocol and procedures in the utmost professional manner and non-invasive way. + +A list of our suggested equipment is below. + +Please let me know if there is any additional paperwork for us to fill out. + +We would be happy to answer any questions or concerns, and would be honored if granted permission by the court. + +Some background on us: Joe Berlinger is one of the world's leading documentary filmmakers and a pioneer in the true crime genre, and has won awards and accolades for films such as the Paradise Lost trilogy (Academy Award nominee, Emmy and Peabody Award winner), Brother's Keeper (Director's Guild of America Award winner), and Under Africa?? Skies (Emmy Award winner). RadicalMedia's work includes the Os ing documentary, The Fog of War, Oscar-nominated and Emmy-winning film, What Happened, Miss?, and two series that were nominated for Emmy's in 2018: My Next Guest Needs No Introduction with David Letterman, and The Fourth Estate. + +# Audiovisual Recording Equipment List + +# Inside the Courtroom + +- Camera A: Arri Amira with small external dimensions: I2.1"x5.4"x5.8". HD monita 4ctem al )recorder, plus tripod. Camera +- Camera B: Arri Amira with small external HD monitor and external recorder, plus tripod. Camera dimensions: 12.1"x5.4"x5.8". +- Battery charger. +- Microphones. +- Sound Devices 788 recorder. +- Transmitter system with receives + +# Outside the Courtroom + +- X32 mixer. +- Video distribution 'tier. +- Audio box. +- Pix240 record& + +Thanks so much and hope to hear from you soon. + +All the best, + +Dave + +Dave Executive Producer/Development, The Joe Berlinger Group + +snyderem\_dionlmedia.com + +212-462-1520 + +www,redioalmedia.com + +mfoimatito contained in this message is intended may for the use of the adarassee and may be attorney pnviteged and/or ccotklenhal. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient. you am hereby notified tnat any unauthorized coseminabon, distribution or ccorng of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this cemmurication In error, please immediately notify the sencer and delete this message. Thank you + +Please be advised that Florida has a broad public records law, and all correspondence to me via email may be subject to disclosure. Under Florida records law (SB80 effective 7-01-06), email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request, do not send emails to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. + +at, \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..617436405c3e1c58c028fa19aa6ad35b260de7f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/EFTA02768077.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,428 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7536, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.15, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 477.5731201171875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 477.5731201171875, + 107.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 107.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE TO COUNSEL OF RECORij", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 405.2269287109375, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 405.2269287109375, + 310.8630676269531 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 310.8630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Notice of Filing \nCase No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 279.0601806640625, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 279.0601806640625, + 69.570556640625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 69.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Denise Van Vooren", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 51.84 + ], + [ + 145.91534423828125, + 51.84 + ], + [ + 145.91534423828125, + 67.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 28.763999999999996, + 67.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Audiovisual Recording Equipment List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 27.54, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 236.63442993164062, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 236.63442993164062, + 316.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 27.54, + 316.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Inside the Courtroom", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 27.54, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 137.25433349609375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 137.25433349609375, + 343.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 27.54, + 343.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Outside the Courtroom", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 26.315999999999995, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 144.3695831298828, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 144.3695831298828, + 495.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 26.315999999999995, + 495.06353759765625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768077" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d520f08e3bc945998d56ee33b228d64d57b476e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768077/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7b962a743ce733eb05536ec2464d69918999f74929cd99910f5ad11859fed966 +size 10757 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a9597dd1686863052964e52e2bb5b911b8f85b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.md @@ -0,0 +1,8546 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1.11. I hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXIOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +11- n 4ividually, and Ma J. t individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF RESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S E IN'S J. ITNESS LIST, ETC. + +A + +Cos + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("E sponds to the Motion to Strike Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List Filed October 5 0 to, Once Again, Confirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines filed by Counter-Plainti Cam') on October 10, 2018, and states: + +### INTRODUCTION + +If this Co eant hat it said in its new August 3, 2018, Order Setting Jury Trial ("the Trial Order' 'In ), containing new pm-trial deadlines for the newly severed Counterclaim, then this go no further but to deny Motion because Epstein's Exhibit and Witness L were timely filed on October 5, 2018. if, as suggests, this Court made a mistake in issuing its Trial Order with new deadlines and intends to use the non-severed claims Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms, then a Binger analysis is required to determine if there is any genuine "surprise" as to exhibits and listing of an expert witness. + +agrees that the severed trial requires a new Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms, but wants to freeze in time Exhibit and Witness Lists for the past year. + +already stipulated to the parties both not waiving their "right to amend their Exhibit Lists" in the last Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation executed by both parties' counsel and filed December 22, 2017. (Exhibit B, Section D.) + +While the Trial Order established new deadlines based on calendar call, bt the case is special set and a calendar call date was not referenced in the Trial Order, Iculated pretrial deadlines based on the first day of trial, this included the dat s C a new Pre-Trial Stipulation (November 14, 2018) which includes Jury Instru erdict Forms, and to exchange Exhibit and Witness Lists (October 5, 2018) 4, s timely filed his Exhibit and Witness Lists on October 5, 2018. This Court pr i 1Sio, r ts dished new deadlines in the Trial Order to allow the parties to file new pre-trial is" based on election to sever his Counterclaim and the requisite new trial(.c" + +### ARGUMENT + +### A. December 4, 2018 is t Fi rial Settine on Severed Claims + +For the more th years this case has been pending, and as set forth in the parties' December 22, 20 al Stipulation, Epstein's claim against Rothstein and la claim against Eps - by the parties' stipulations and prior trial orders - to be tried together. (ExhibltP ction C.) On March 1, 2018, just 12 days before the scheduled trial date, for the first time asked to try his Counterclaim separately. At the March 8, 2018, hearing on Motion, and as memorialized in its March 13, 2018, Order, the Court granted that request. + +Given request for separate trials, the parties' Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms, as well as trial exhibits and witnesses, must change or the Court runs the risk of significant jury confusion + +The parties previously filed pre-trial documents — Exhibit Lists, Witness Lists, Rebuttal Witness Lists, Expert Disclosures, he-Trial Stipulation, Deposition Designa ions, Jury instructions and Verdict Forms — all prepared and based on the claims proceedin + +### B. The Court Re-Established Deadlines in the Past + +While this is the first trial setting of MEE' severed claim new deadlines almost every time the trial of all claims was set, llo 0 rt has established + +| | | | Niines? | Judge | +|-----------|----------|-----------|----------------|--------| +| 4/15/10 | 10/25/10 | Docket AC | ased on | | +| 9/2/10 | 3/7/11 | DIE)N‘i e | Islo | ■ | +| 4/2/13 | 10/28/13 | | Yes — based on | | +| 11/4/13 | 6/10/14 | al | Yes — based on | | +| 11/15/13 | 5/ | Special | Yes —based on | | +| 12/3/15 | 8/29 | Docket | Yes — based on | | +| 5/20/1 Ar | 0/24/16 | Docket | Yes — based on | | +| 7 | 12/5/17 | Special | Yes — based on | | +| sti | | | | Hafele | +| 17 | 3/13/18 | Special | No | Hafele | + +Edsards, each time the trial was reset, and seven years after the firs trial setting, filed new Exhibit and Witness Lists. In fact, his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit Lists identifies 218 exhibits compared to the list he filed in June 2010 for the first trial setting which only contained 147 exhibits. Importantly, in those seven years, did not identify an expert witness for the first time until October 6, 2017! + +Establishing new deadlines based on a new trial date and severed claims is the correct process and will not be prejudiced. See infra; Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Gaspar's Passage, LLC v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 243 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); v. Holloway, 933 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.440(c) ("If the court finds the action ready to be set for trial, it shall enter an order fixing a date for War); 15th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 3.203-9/08 (Sept. 29, 2008) (providing that the form4l ed to the order (except for time deadlines), requiring an exchange of lists of exhibi esses before calendar call "shall constitute the uniform pretrial orders for circuit co ions") (emphasis added)) + +### C. Binger Requires this Court to Allow the Exhibi ,,S t) + +The Trial Order requires the parties to file i Shs e t. P v -Trial Stipulation and Exhibit and Sic Trial Order is the first time any trial h •ssued on Counterclaim being tried Witness Lists. This is the appropriate process ( tr ed counterclaim and new trial date. The separately. Under Binger and its ny limitation on the use of exhibits that does not consider the bifurcated Counte d new trial date (and specifically, the lack of prejudice to would be an ab is Court's otherwise broad discretion. + +### 1. Florit4 an Binger's Cautionary Tale + +The es of and analysis required by Binger caution against excluding evidence. "Altho ge has broad discretion in determining whether to exclude evidence due to a party's failure to disclose the evidence within the time required by a pretrial order, the exclusion of such + +I The Circuit's form pretrial order further provides that "[a]t trial, the parties shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown." + +evidence is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compelling circumstances and only after the judge has made a case-specific determination as to whether admission of the evidence would result in actual procedural prejudice to the objecting party." Med. Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines, 911 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)(e.s.); see also Tomlinson-McKenzie v. Prince, 718 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (noting that the court's discretion in such an analysis "should be guided primarily by whether the `objecting party' would be prejudiced by the at on of the evidence."). An objecting party is prejudiced by the admission of evide disclosed "if the party might have taken some action to protect itsel the witness or exhibit, and there exists no other alternative t A explained in Binger, the Court should also consider the prejudice, (2) its independent knowledge of an exhi "c' 4t :St not timely timely notice of he prejudice." Id. As arty's (1) ability to cure the oving party's possible intentional or bad faith noncompliance with a pretrial or S, ) possible disruption of the orderly and efficient trial of the case. Id. Important) ( ing party may not, having closed its eyes to the existence of evidence prior to hat the admission of that evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of th ase.7 d. These principles to' ,lighted in the recent case of Gaspar's Passage, LLC v. RaceTrac + +Petroleum, Inc., So. 3 492 (Ma. 2d DCA 2018). In Gaspar's Passage, the appellate court reversed a \$ lion judgment because the trial court had erred by "refusing to permit [the appell additional witnesses or exhibits after granting [a] continuance of the trial." Id. at 495. Specifically, the trial court had continued a trial to allow the defendant/counter-claimant, RaceTrac, to add additional parties to its complaint. Before the new trial, the court suggested the parties were "starting from where [they] stopped," id. at 496, and that Gaspar could not start adding new exhibits or experts. Three months before the new trial, Gaspar noticed its intent to have the + +court consider its request to designate an expert witness on the issue of damages, and take the deposition of RaceTrac's expert witness. The trial court again suggested that Gaspar was "sort of stuck with what happened with the attorney that they hired back at the beginning" and, in large part, granted a motion to strike filed by RaceTrac. Id. at 499. Later, Gaspar moved to amend its exhibit list, seeking to add documents it claimed were relevant to all claims and defen es, such as notices of proposed property taxes, e-mails, land surveys, a broker's opinion e and an environmental site investigation report. Id. Notably, Gaspar's counsel ha ta • ut that some of these documents were public records — as has done h e ards' Motion to Strike, 116 ("It appears that a large portion of these exhibits e publicly available for years."). + +The Second District reversed the substanc , itls, • , t for RaceTrac, concluding with regard to Gaspar's ability to use the exhibits: s S ti v + +> The trial court also abused its disc on by denying Gaspar's motion to amend its exhibit ligin August 2016, several weeks before trial. The intended exhibit's became relevant as a result of the amended pleadings, but a , thvrial court failed to conduct the required prejudice analys bef re denying the motion. + +.... Ultimate! al court agreed with RaceTrac's hearsay and gam ans ip rguments, concluding that Gaspar was not entitled to,d addi tonal exhibits "that you've never provided." But a t a party engaged in gamesmanship is not the equivalent tiding that RaceTrac would be prejudiced by the addition of Alecxhibits.... Further, if, as Gaspar's counsel alleged, some of the xhibits were public record, RaceTrac would have difficulty establishing prejudice. Indeed, the transcript reflects that RaceTrac was aware of at least the property appraiser records—which are public record—because its expert had relied on a report that incorporated those records.t21 + +2Analogously, some of Epstein's exhibits that takes issue with in the present case are also public records. + +Id. at 502-03 (citations and parenthetical explanations omitted)(underlined emphasis added). See also v. Holloway, 933 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (reversing a trial court's exclusion of surveillance video evidence of the plaintiff that was disclosed four weeks before trial based on issues associated with a fifth videotape, where there was "no possibility" of prejudice to the plaintiff, "[t]he videotape the defense sought to introduce in evidence had been full disclosed, and was listed as an exhibit"). + +Gaspar's Passage—and a long line of cases before it—establis icke trial court's discretion to preclude a party from using exhibits at trial based on n i ncems cannot be exercised in a vacuum. In the present case, has conced • g that "a large portion" of Epstein's exhibits "have been publicly available for 2 ee Motion, 11 16. Therefore, there can be no Binger prejudice and pr V icSi ese exhibits would be an abuse of discretion, requiring a second trial. cf 2. Clear Record History of Exh' ....e an S>isclosure Preventing Alleged Surprise + +attempts to mudd s waters by complaining of exhibits he simply does not like because they are harm Ito i high burden of proof. However, simply cannot claim surprise when the • (1) were already in his possession, (2) are public record and/or (3) have been in on for months. + +By w kground, Epstein's prior counsel served an Exhibit List on August 15, 2016, which demented with one exhibit on September 28, 2017. (Exhibits C and D.) Shortly after appearing in the case, Epstein's counsel attempted to assemble documents to correspond with those lists and, on November 9, 2017, sent counsel a flash drive containing some of those documents. (Exhibit E.) Exhibit 10 included "documents produced by and Epstein included on the flash drive 164 pages representing the documents that were originally on + +M privilege log that were produced by on March 7, 2012, in response to the Court's Order. + +On November 16, 2017, Epstein filed an Amended Exhibit List, in essence listing documents individually that were previously disclosed (i.e., the documents previously produced for Exhibit 10), but also still including general categories, including Exhibit 13 whi h included "Documents produced by " (Exhibit F.) Epstein's Amended Exhibit Li tified 331 eS - exhibits. + +The parties exchanged flash drives with their respective exhi Oo e mber 19, 2017. Within that production at Exhibit 13, Epstein included 26 page In Epstein's counsel's cover letter, M' counsel was advised, "In light of recent rulings, we anticipate amending our Exhibit List after we have had an li ,, s,n to review Mr. Epstein's former counsels' files." (Exhibit G.) + +Epstein made additional rolling ct S ctio re\ ig of trial exhibits after that date, on February 2, 2018, February 16, 2018, and M h , 8. (Exhibits H, I, J.) Because the documents produced fell within general c gori and the Clerk's pre-marking exhibit instructions required exhibits to be identified Ily, on March 5, 2018, Epstein filed a Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to correspond with dOc ents provided to (Exhibit K.) moved to exclude all exhibits p after the December 19, 2017, exchange and identified on Epstein's Clerk's Trial EL Y st. The Court granted that request finding, at the time, that the exhibits were late disclosed based on the operative trial order and the March 2018 trial date. + +On April 27, 2018, seven months before the December 4, 2018, trial date (and before the Trial Order was entered by this Court), Epstein moved to amend his Exhibit List, attaching his proposed list identifying the new exhibits to his Supplement filed on May 2, 2018. (Exhibit L.) The proposed Exhibit List eliminated a number of exhibits from his December 2017 list, identified items individually which had previously been produced under general categories and excluded (until the Court rules) the 47 exhibits which alleges are attorney-client privileged, but about which a Court's determination has never been made. Epstein identified only four new items, including No. 26, the April 7, 2011, audio of and Jack Scarola's, telephonic interview of and No. 27, May I 7, 2011, Noti ing of the Transcript of the audio. Both of these items were generated by d already in his possession. Importantly, all of the documents had been previous( + +The Court's new Trial Order properly allowed the parti fil Exhibit and Witness Lists based on severed Counterclaim and rende s Motion for Leave to Amend moot. Epstein timely filed his new Exhibit List on 8 o , 2018. (Exhibit M.) This list was identical to the list attached to his April 2 ~o n for Leave to Amend, except Epstein eliminated two exhibits. As set forth a , ex its that had been produced to under general categories on December 2 \*dentified as individual exhibits. + +To be clear, between 8, when Epstein filed his proposed Exhibit List, through October 5, 2018, when he r is new Exhibit List, Epstein did not identify any new exhibits but, rather, eliminate. All e documents were already in possession. Nevertheless, on October 5, 2 i counsel provided a new flash drive containing the exhibits yet again to Edward. (Exhibit N.) + +### 3. General Categories + +also complains that Epstein's new Exhibit List continues to contain "catch-all" categories (Epstein's Exhibit Nos. 544-553). As set forth above, Epstein identified specifically + +documents that he previously produced under catch-all categories. Exhibit Nos. 544 through 553 are typical catch-all categories used in almost every case and provide as follows: + +| 544 | All public records and news articles reliiitalcott Rothstein, | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, J. or any | +| 545 | All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery and any | +| 546 | All documents produced by any party or non-party in thOi after | +| 547 | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affida ' | +| 548 | All charts/analyses prepared based on docum ex ged or | +| 549 | All foundation exhibits | +| 550 | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibi | +| 551 | Demonstrative aids and exhibits i u ' , t not limited to, | +| | charts, timelines, diagrams, m , , photographs and | +| 552 | All newly discovered do e e ibits | +| 553 | Any and all exhibits H b dley J. (by identifying | +| | these as exhibits, Ekt n t waiving his right to object to any | +| | of exhj.eid uced at trial) | + +himself, ide ified ch-all categories in his December 7, 2017, Second Amended Exhibit List a there ore has no basis to complain about Epstein's list. (Exhibit 0.) For example, Edw( t ide ted the following catch-all categories: + +| ib | applicable criminal statutes INII | +|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------| +| ' 36 | All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant | +| 40 | Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications | +| 106 | Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped depositions and | +| 107 | Any and all expert witness reports and/or records generated in | + +| 108 | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, diagrams and models, surveys, photographs and similar material including blow-ups of the listed items/exhibits | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 112 | All exhibits listed by Epstein subject to ██████████ objections | +| 113 | All pleadings and attachments in the action under the Crime Victims Rights Act prosecuted by ██████████ ██████████ on behalf of victims of Epstein's criminal molestations | +| 115 | All time records and hourly billing documentation produced in discovery | +| 116 | All deposition testimony and discovery responses by Epstein submitted in this action | +| 117 | All pleadings filed by Epstein in the Rothstein bankruptcy proceeding | +| 118 | All submissions by Epstein in connection with the Rothstein deposition | +| 123 | All emails produced by Defendant and/or all emails produced by Plaintiff in this case | +| 209 | Any and all responses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with or without deposition | +| 210 | All Interrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to Produce and Responses, Requests for Admissions and Responses thereto | +| 211 | Any and all documents produced in this action | +| 212 | Any and all depositions taken in this action | +| 213 | Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used during any deposition in this action | +| 214 | Any and all exhibits, documents, etc., referred to in any deposition | +| 215 | Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action | +| 216 | Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal | +| 217 | Any and all pleadings filed in this action | +| 218 | Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action | + +## D. , i21Vew Pre-Trial Filings Ensures an Orderly Process, a Fair Trial and Truth + +Th trial of this case should focus on uncovering the truth related to IM• claim against Epstein, not about hiding relevant evidence. Allowing the parties to file new pre-trial documents in accordance with the Trial Order will achieve this goal and ensure a fair trial. That is, the parties will be able to present evidence that goes to the very heart of MI allegations. + +There are several reasons why should not oppose this request. First and as a threshold matter, already stipulated to the parties' "right to amend their Exhibit Lists" on December 22, 2017, in the Joint Pre-Trial Stipulation: + +- D. Exhibit Lists (with Objections): The parties do not waive their right to amend their Exhibit Lists and to identify additional objections for those exhibits that have not yet been disclosed and/or provided to correspond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + +(Exhibit B.) Surely, recognizes this stipulation and waiver of an a ASe • 1 objection to amend exhibit lists. In upholding a binding pre-trial stipulation, t Appeal expressly admonished counsel who failed to honor the Kati istrict Court of + +> Our system of justice depends upon lawy of the court. Here, insurance counsel abandoned and engaged in gamesmanship by failing to honor i tion. That conduct deprived the purchaser of a fair ' ' ; Lice equires a new trial. + +Cent. Square Tarragon LLC v. Great Divi . ., 82 So. 3d 911, 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. B rive, Inc., 174 So. 3d 1037, 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)("Pretrial stipulations... in pon the parties and the court, and should be strictly enforced."). Similarly, be held to his stipulation that both parties could amend their + +exhibits lists, not on if ;riment would favor M. + +Next, ar should agree to the amended exhibit list because he has taken the position that he h to hide. For instance, during motions practice concerning the documents gathered r ponse to the Subpoena to the Trustee for Rothstein Rosenfeld and Adler, which include the 47 exhibits, counsel made the following statement: + +> ...as much as we might like to take all of this and put it on the floor in the courtroom for Your Honor and everybody else in the world to take a look at because we have nothing to hide, we can't do that. + +(7/13/11 Hearing Tr. 58:2-6, emphasis added) (Exhibit P). + +Furthermore, the parties should be allowed to amend, update and file a new Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms and Exhibit and Witness Lists based on the Counterclaim. In fact, if new documents are not filed, there runs a risk of significant jury confusion. The case to be tried is no longer Epstein v. Rothstein with Counterclaim by v. Epstein. Simply using the old Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms and xhibit and Witness Lists from a different lawsuit set to be tried is not a proper procedure. + +This Court must have recognized this in issuing the new Trial O parties 60 days' advance notice before trial for the exchange of Exhi a reasonable amount of time before trial and Epstein's complii) d Epstein complied by filing his Exhibit and Witness Lis igo e er 5, 2018. Additionally, in ighI\* d provided copies to already had a majority of the ord. Therefore, there was no "surprise" and it March 2018, Epstein identified the documents sp December 2017, February 2018 and March 20 documents in his possession or they wer ' blic ",ef allowed the ess Lists. This is not prejudice in would be an abuse of this Court's t to allow the parties to file new Exhibit and Witness • Lists and other pre-trial docu ch as a new Pre-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms, pursuant rial Order's deadlines. + +Pursuant e sem nal Florida Supreme Court case of Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 , this Court's exercise "must not be exercised blindly," but guided by three facto these factors depend on whether the evidence is "adverse" to the objecting party. Rather, this Court must consider: (i) ability to cure the prejudice or, similarly, his independent knowledge of the existence of the evidence had knowledge in 2009 and again when Epstein disclosed exhibits and witnesses in December 2017, February 2018 and March 2018); (ii) Epstein's possible intentional, or bad-faith, noncompliance with the pretrial order (none); and (iii) the possible disruption and efficient trial of the case (none). If after considering these factors, the trial court concludes that use of the exhibits will not substantially endanger the fairness of the proceeding, the pretrial order mandating disclosure should be modified and the witness or evidence should be allowed to testify or be introduced. See Binger, 401 So. 2d at 1313. + +A Binger analysis compels but one conclusion: it would be an abuse of is Court's discretion not to allow additional exhibits and witnesses under these circumstan expanse of time. Because the exhibits were provided to at the latest in (more than six months ago), and many of the exhibits stemmed from r or are of public record, there is no "surprise in fact" to from anythin t ein is now permitted to disclose in accordance with the Trial Order. Thus, whet can "cure" anything is not even an issue. + +e l With no hope of a Binger prejudice t only conceivable basis for not supporting new deadlines and acceptin ein xhibit and Witness Lists is because wants to thwart Epstein's efforts f 'r d truthful trial. As the Court is aware, Epstein's new counsel made efforts to revie entity trial exhibits. Once became aware that Epstein planned to use e that is detrimental to his claim, he has taken extreme efforts to keep that evidenr t of t e light of day and the jury's view. These tactics should no longer be countenanc r, the parties should be allowed to file new pre-trial documents based on Edwar ed counterclaim in accordance with the Court's new Trial Order. Epstein recognizes that the Court must still make rulings concerning the 47 exhibits that claims are attorney-client privileged even though the same documents were given to an adversary and no court has determined that the documents are still privileged. Epstein has not yet identified those documents on his Exhibit List, but intends to do so if the Court rules in his favor. + +### E. Epstein's Expert Witness + +On October 5, 2018, Epstein also filed his new Witness List. (Exhibit Q.) Because the trial will not include Epstein's claims against Rothstein, Epstein eliminated a number of witnesses from his original list. Epstein did identify his previously disclosed expert, C. Culver as allowed by the Trial Order. In his Motion, argues that Epstein should not be allowed to disclose an expert. however, was not prejudiced by Epstein's initial r expert, and he again will not be prejudiced by Epstein's timely disclosing with the Trial Order. At most, may desire to take Mr. of expert witness in December 2017. Astutely, this 2018, hearing, striking an expert witness is a drastic mess, to add an V n accordance n, as Epstein did gnized at the March 8, + +> [A] request to strike a witness is a reserved Iy in rare circum dealing with an expert which is he's going to testify. d extreme measure ally where here we're ualified to testify to what + +(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 93:16-20.) Indeed, ' d in Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), the exclusion of witness' testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compe circumstances. . . . Binger further indicates that when the opposing party is n S pre i di ed by the late disclosure, and compelling circumstances are not otherwise sho he 'tress should generally be allowed to testify." Walters v. Keebler Co., 652 So. 2d 97 . 1st DCA 1995). + +there is no question that Epstein's expert is qualified to testify. Further, due to bifurcation of his Counterclaim and ensuing appeal, there was sufficient time for to take Mr. deposition. Epstein will not object to opening discovery for that purpose. Significantly, can claim no surprise because he has known since December 2017 the opinions of which Mr. will testify, as disclosed on Epstein's earlier filed expert + +disclosure and in Answers to Expert Interrogatories filed on January 18, 2018.3 (Exhibit 12.) Because there is no showing nor can there be any genuine assertion of prejudice or other compelling circumstances, excluding Mr. would be a drastic measure, and this Court should allow him to testify. See Walters, 652 So. 2d at 977. + +### CONCLUSION + +Motion to Strike Exhibit and Witness Lists is nothing more than "tation for this Court to abuse its discretion. Pursuant to this Court's Trial Order, Epst disclosed his Exhibits and Witness Lists on October 5, 2018. Florida case law, t Civil Procedure, and even the Local Rules of this Circuit demonstrate that the • o udice to from this standard procedure. + +This Court properly established new pre ' qqv nes on severed claims. Epstein respectfully requests that the Court u cl1 Sinew deadlines, accept Epstein's October 5, 2018, Exhibit and Witness Lists as f y fi , including the timely disclosure of an expert witness, and allow the parties to re-Trial Stipulation, Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms tailored to se a m. + +3Edwards fust disclosed his expert's name on October 6, 2017, but did not disclose the subject matter of his testimony until October 20 2017, after the disclosure deadline. The Court, however, denied Epstein's request to strike expert. Epstein disclosed his expert a mere two months after expert's report was disclosed. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 26th, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. Edwards

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Bradley J. Edwards
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W.
Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. and L M, individually, Defendant(s). ,individually, cos + +### ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AM) DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES + +### I. SCHEDULING + +THIS CAUSE came before this court on Defendant, J. , Notice for Trial of Bradley Severed Claim Against Jeffrey Epstein and the court bein tkteyvise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ( + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is specially set, number one, for jury trial on Tuesday, December 4, 2O18, at 9:3O a.m., (1O days reserved) in Courtroom 1OC, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 2O5 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 334O1. + +### II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE + +- A. On the last business day no later than 60 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of all trial exhibits, names and addresses of all trial witnesses, and names and addresses of all expert witnesses. +- B. On the last business day no later than 50 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall exchange lists of names and addresses of all rebuttal witnesses. + +### Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- C. In addition to names and addresses of each expert retained to formulate an expert opinion with regard to this cause, both on the initial listing and on rebuttal, the panics shall provide: + - 1. the subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; + - 2. the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify; + - 3. a summary of the grounds for each opinion; + - 4. a copy of any written reports issued by the expert regarding this case; and + - 5. a copy of the expert's curriculum vitae. +- D. On the last business day no later than 30 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL, the parties shall confer and: + - 1. discuss settlement; + - 2. simplify the issues and stipulate, in writing, as to as many facts and issues as possible; + - 3. prepare a Pre-Trial Stipulation in accordance with paragraph E; and + - 4. list all objections to trial exhibits. +- E. PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS MUST BE FILED. It shall be the duty of counsel for the Plaintiff to see that the Pre-Trial Stipulation is drawn, executed by counsel for all panics, and filed with the Clerk no later than 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL. UNILATERAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS ARE DISALLOWED, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE COURT, AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING SHOWING GOOD CAUSE. Counsel for all parties are charged with good faith cooperation in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: + - I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of trial or thereafter). All Daubert Motions must be heard 20 days before the start of the trial. + - 2. stipulated facts which require no proof at trial which may be read to the trier of fact; + - 3. a statement of all issues of fact for determination at trial; + - 4. each party's numbered list of trial exhibits with specific objections, if any, to schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 5. each party's numbered list of trial witnesses with addresses (including all known rebuttal witnesses); the list of witnesses shall be on separate schedules attached to the Stipulation; + - 6. a statement of estimated trial time; + - 7. names of attorneys to try case; and + - 8. number of peremptory challenges per party. + +### Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures + +Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- F. FILING OF PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION. Failure to file the Pre-Trial Stipulation or a Court Approved Unilateral Stipulation as above provided may result in the case being stricken from the Court's calendar at its sounding or other sanctions. +- G. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS, WITNESSES OR OBJECTIONS. At trial, the panics shall be strictly limited to exhibits and witnesses disclosed and objections reserved on the schedules attached to the Pre-Trial Stipulation prepared in accordance with paragraphs D and E, absent agreement specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or order of the Court upon good cause shown. Failure to reserve objections constitutes a waiver. A party desiring to use an exhibit or witness discovered after counsel have conferred pursuant to paragraph D shall immediately furnish the Court and other counsel with a description of the exhibit or with the witness' name and address and the expected subject matter of the witness' testimony, together with the reason for the late discovery of the exhibit or witness. Use of the exhibit or witness may be allowed by the Court for good cause shown or to prevent manifest injustice. +- H. DISCOVERY. Unless otherwise agreed in the Pre-Trial Stipulation, all discovery must be completed no later than 10 DAYS BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR CALENDAR CALL absent agreement for later discovery specifically stated in the Pre-Trial Stipulation or for other good cause shown. +- I. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. No pre-trial conference pursuant to Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.200 is set by the Court on its own motion. If a pre-trial conference is set upon motion of a party, counsel shall meet and, prepare a stipulation pursuant to paragraphs D and E and file the stipulation no later than '5 DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. Failure to request a pre-trial conference in a timely fashion constitutes a waiver of the notice of requirement of Rule 1.200. Motions for Summary Judgment will not be heard at any pretrial conference. +- J. UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF LAW. Prior to calendar call, counsel for the parties are directed to exchange and simultaneously submit to the Court appropriate memoranda with citations to legal authority in support of any unique legal questions which may reasonably be anticipated to arise during the trial. +- K. MODIFICATION TO UNIFORM PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. Upon written stipulation of the parties filed with the court, the Pre-Trial Procedure, except for items II D-F, inclusive, may be modified in accordance with the parties' stipulation, except to the extent that the stipulation may interfere with the Court's scheduling of the matter for trial or hinder the orderly progress of the trial. +- L. PREMARKING EXHIBITS. Prior to trial, each party shall meet with and assist the clerk in marking for identification all exhibits, as directed by the clerk. + +**M. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS.** No later than **20 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL**, each party shall serve his, her, or its designation of depositions, or portions of depositions, each intends to offer as testimony in his, her or its case in chief. No later than **10 DAYS PRIOR TO CALENDAR CALL**, each opposing party shall serve his, her, or its counter (or "fairness") designations to portions of depositions designated, together with objections to the depositions, or portions thereof, originally designated. No later than calendar call, each party shall serve his, her or its objections to counter designations served by an opposing party. + +### **III. MEDIATION** + +A. All parties are required to participate in mediation. + +1. 1. The appearance of counsel who will try the case and representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. +2. 2. At least **ONE WEEK BEFORE THE CONFERENCE**, all parties shall file with the mediator a brief, written summary of the case containing a list of issues as to each party. If an attorney or party filing the summary wishes its content to remain confidential, he/she must advise the mediator in writing when the report is filed. +3. 3. All discussions, representations, and statements made at the mediation conference shall be privileged consistent with Florida Statutes sections 44.102 and 90.408. +4. 4. The mediator has no power to compel or enforce a settlement agreement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(b), unless waived. + +B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (f), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the mediation and the mediator's name. The mediator shall be paid \$175.00 per hour, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. + +C. Completion of mediation prior to calendar call is a prerequisite to trial. If mediation is not conducted, or if a party fails to participate in mediation, the case, at the Court's discretion, may be stricken from the trial calendar, pleadings may be stricken, and other sanctions may be imposed. + +D. Any party opposing mediation may proceed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1,700(b). + +of August, 20 8. DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florisl'tlis 3rd day + +### IV. NONCOMPLIANCE + +NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ANY PORTION OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE STRIKING OF THE CASE, WITNESSES, OR EXHIBITS, OR IMPOSITION OF SUCH OTHER SANCTIONS AS ARE JUST. + +O + +### Copies furnished to: + +F F F F F F F F F F Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) James (brad@eptIc.com) Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com) John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN-AIR KARA BERARD CKENBACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAW.COM) Kara Berard Rockenbach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) KAREN E TERRY (\_TERRYTEAM@SEARCYLAW.COM) Karen Elizabeth Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) Maria kel4chian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp@law.utaltedu) PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAWC0m) RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) + +JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +![](_page_23_Picture_4.jpeg) + +### Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures Case No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmail.com) I7 SCOTT J LINK (SCOTtft:LINKROCKLAW COM) +- service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytrial.com) +- William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) +- **William B. kingteam@searcylaw.com)** +- **Rodney G (alex@matrixmediation.com)** +- **Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@linkrocklaw.com)** +- **John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.com)** +- **David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@searcylaw.com)** +- **James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com) 17 Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com) 57 NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com) 7 Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) P' John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) \** +- **Jack A Goldberger Ogoldberger@agwpa.c** +- **Andrew A Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.c P David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com** +- **NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com)** +- **Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com)** +- **Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) (staff.effle@pathtojustice.com)** +- **Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com) Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) Kara Ber l 'Rockenbach (troy@linkrocklaw.com) Fr, David P\ yitale Jr. (vitaleteam@searcylaw.com)** + +# EXHIBIT B + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA0408003CXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +### JOINT PRETRIAL S + +Pursuant to this Court's Order Special! ury Trial Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and Defendant/ aintiff C hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Stipulation. + +A + +Goes + +- A. List of All Pending Mo trial of this matter is special set to commence on March 13, 2018. The parties tici to that additional Motions will be filed before that date. Presently, the following ions/Requests are pending: + - 1. 9/21 +- a. Ed 7/1 ds' four Motions to Compel and the following relatecal: , Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to Four O M ons to Compel. /17, Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of Confidential ettlement Agreement Against and His Counsel and the following related filing: + - a. 11/8/17, Response in Opposition. + - 3. 10/26/17, Motion for Protective Order. + - 4. 11/6/17, Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/15/17, Response in Opposition to Epstein's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery; + +- b. 9/25/17, EFS -esMotion to Compel Discovery Responses from and +- c. 9/28/17, Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motio to Compel Discovery Responses. +- 5. 11/8/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Flo 90.202 and 90.203, and the following related filings: + - a. 11/17/17, Epstein's Objection to Request + - b. 11/28/17, Epstein's Notice of Filing Supplement al Notice; and +- y. tatutes Section +- 6. 11/13/17, Motion in Limine Address' ope of Admissible Evidence and the following firelated lings: + - a. 11/17/17, Supplement to imine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence; + - b. 11/22/17, Epstein's Oppositio ' Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evide + - c. 4 12/11/17, Sec Scope of Admissible E +- 7. 11/17/17, following related +- a. 11/13/17, E ment to Motion in Limine Addressing Notice of Production from Non-Parties and the otice of Production from Non-Parties. +- 8. 11/22/17, stein's equest for Judicial Notice. +- 9. 12/1/ , Ed s' Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Requests for Admission. +12/4/17, Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery Responses by Epstein Implicating the Attorney-Client Privilege. +- 12. 12/4/17, Request for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 90.202 and 90.203. +- 13. 12/8/17, Notice of Filing Preliminary Objections and Counter Designations to Epstein's Deposition Designations. +- 14. 12/15/17, Epstein's Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness +- 10. 1 wards' Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript Excerpts and Discovery nses by Epstein Implicating the Fifth Amendment (as to Sections II — V only). + +### B. Stipulated Facts: + +- 1. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea for one count Amm\ ny licitation of prostitution, a third-degree felony, and one count of pr person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a second-degree felony. 107.) +- 2. was admitted to The Florida Bar in March 07 ( ' 11/10/17 Depo. 43:10-12.) +- 3. After being admitted to the Florida Bar orked as an Assistant State Atte at the Broward State Afton% for approximately three years. 5/15/13 Depo. 6:11-15; /10/17 Depo. 50:3-5.) +- 4. After leaving the Broward S 's Office, went to work for the law firm of Kubicki Dra he worked for approximately three handling insurance defe al 5/15/13 Depo. 7:3-10; 11/10/17 Depo. 56:10 117\W hik an employee of RRA, represented himself to the public, including Epstein, as a partner of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 189:22-192:9.) +- 5. formed united liability company on April 16, 2007, by the name of "The Law O Brad & Associates, LLC." (Sunbiz.org.) +- 6. rking at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA") in April 2009 Ed s' 3/23/10 Depo. 13:19-22.) +- 7. association with RRA terminated at the end of October or beginning of mber 2009. ( 3/23/10 Depo. 15:5-11.) +- 9. Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") was the managing partner and CEO of RRA. 11/10/17 Depo. 267:12-13.) +- 10. Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license in November 2009 and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 25, 2009. (11/25/09 Opinion, The Florida Bar v. Rothstein, Supreme Court of Florida, Case No. SC09- 2146.) + +- 11. Rothstein was arrested and arraigned in federal court in Broward Co ty, Florida on December 1, 2009. (12/1/09 Information, United States ofAmeri a Rothstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case N 1 (D.E. I).) +- 12. In August and September 2008, while working at The La o Brad & Associates, LLC, filed three separate laws Epstein on behalf of three separate clients: L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe. (8 Complaint, Jane Doe + - v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern 'strict of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80893 (D.E. 1); 9/11/08 Com t, LM. v. Jeffiey Epstein, 15'h Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Coun e po. 50-2008-CA-028051 (D.E. 4); 9/11/08 Complaint, E.W. v. Jeffrey 5''' Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-C #1: , E. 4).) +- 13. E stein does not admit or deny when he was a sole and Jane Doe). However filed the lawsuits agai +- 14. While an emplo Jane Doe cases +- 15. While an e stmOd A litik'tic) t erointlibee hal . allegations ofhis in the three ollaiewsotsui(tLbromuttwby es not challenge good faith when he pstein. 11/20/17 Depo. 78:3-6; 120:11-18.) Mists the lead attorney on the L.M., E.W. and of RRA, was the sole employee of RRA who made ions on the L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe cases against Epstein. 1 /20/17 Depo. 85:2-15.) 16.E an employee of RRA, did not represent any individuals other than , E.W. and Jane Doe with regard to claims against Epstein. ( 3/23/10 po. 291:8; 11/10/17 Depo. 77:1-7.) +- 17. On July 24, 2009, while was employed by RRA, a Complaint was filed on behalf of L.M. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (7/24/09 Complaint, L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-CV-81092 (D.E. 1).) +- 18. L.M. already had a state court action pending against Epstein at the time the July 24, 2009, federao Complaint was filed which was based on the same facts and circumstances. 11/10/17 Depo. 316:11-20.) + +- 19. never formally served Epstein with the federal Complaint t was filed on behalf of L.M. against Epstein. al 5/15/13 Depo. 34:10 +- 20. L.M.'s July 24, 2009, federal Complaint against Epstein allege her into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engage intercourse with Epstein and she never touched his geni Complaint 142(j) (D.E. 19).) Epstein forced I or vaginal Answer to +- 21. While was employed by RRA he mad emston to take the deposition of three pilots who had flown, at different lanes used by Epstein, and am deposition of a fourth pilot Answer to Complaint 1 36 e litigation against Epstein. +- 22. On August 24, 2009, L.M. not sitions of Epstein's pilots Paul Visoski, Jr., and David rs. L.M. requested they produce "[a]ll original flight logs from 4 , 1998 through present for any and all aircraft/airplanes/jets w piloted or co-piloted that were owned or controlled by Jeffre or Ghislaine Maxwell." (8/24/09 Notices of Deposition and Su ces Tecums, L M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm l h nty, Case No. 50-2008-C A-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 114, 11 +- 23. In August pile was employed by RRA, he noticed the deposition of Id p in the Jane Doe litigation. (8/11/09 and 8/24/09, Re-Notices of T Videotaped Depositions, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District +- 24. Cie them District of Florida, Case No. 08-80893.) was employed by RRA, he served Answers to Interro atones on half of L.M. and E.W. indicating that he intended to call Bill who was the governor of New Mexico a, as a trial witness as part of clients' litigation against Epstein. Answer to Complaint 140 (D.E. 19).) +- 25. a three clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) never testified that they had sex with a celebrity, dignitary or international figure associated with Epstein. a 11/10/17 Depo. 167:21-168:10.) +- 26. In August 2009, a, on behalf of his client E.W., served a Request for Entry Upon Land seeking to inspect Epstein's entire home and property and to take videos + +and photograph it. (8/10/09, Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 143).) + +1. 27. On August 20, 2009, the Court in the E.W. matter noted that E.W.'s request to inspect Epstein's entire home and property was withdrawn. (8/20/09, Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land, *E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXX-MB (D.E. 151).) +2. 28. In August and September 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's medical records from Stephen Alexander, Bruce W. Markowitz and Charles J. Galecki. The Subpoenas sought, "[t]he complete medical file including MRIs, scans, X-rays and any other diagnostic test result, Intake Form, notes, reports, opinions, correspondence to or from third parties, correspondence to or from Jeffrey Epstein, referrals, medical bills, in short, your complete file." (8/19/09 and 9/11/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 105, 127, 129).) +3. 29. On August 14, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of his client L.M., served Notices of Production from Non-Parties evidencing his intent to obtain Epstein's prescription history from Lewis Pharmacy and Greens Pharmacy. The Subpoenas sought, "[a] complete computer printout of any and all prescriptions for medication, name and type of prescription, and all other documentation or information on or regarding Jeffrey Epstein." (8/14/09, Notice of Production from Non-Party, *L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein*, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB (D.E. 97, 100).) +4. 30. On April 24, 2007, L.M., before she was a client of [REDACTED], provided a statement to the FBI. +5. 31. In September 2009, while [REDACTED] was employed by RRA, his client, L.M., testified at a deposition in her case against Epstein. +6. 32. On June 19, 2009, [REDACTED], on behalf of his Jane Doe client, filed a Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure + +Potential Judgment. (6/19/09 Motion, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-\$0119 (D.E. 165).) + +- 33. In July Jane Doe). 20101.in settled the claims of three die .W., L.M. and 11/10/17 Depo. 305:2-3.) +- 34. The Ponzi scheme through which Rothstein misrep investors began in 2005 and ended in October 2009. for Forfeiture In Rem 1 13, United States v. R Rothstein, United States District Court, Sout CV-61780 (D.E. 1).) +- 35. On November 20, 2009, certain Rothstein in the Seventeenth Ju Florida. This lawsuit was p (11/20/09 Complaint, Razor Judicial Circuit C 062009CA062943 ms and defrauded Verified Complaint operties Purchased by Scott 'et of Florida, Case No. 09 f Rothstein's Ponzi scheme sued Ire ft Court, in and for Broward County, ublic record as of the date it was filed. ing, LLC, et at v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 17th ward County, Florida, Case No. +- 36. The United S govAfttfient filed an Information against Rothstein on or about December 1, 2 s criminal charge was public record as of the date it was filed. (12/ /09 In ation, United States of America v. Rothstein, United States District Co uthern District of Florida, Case No. 09-60331.) +38. ',ember 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (12/21/09 Answer and Counterclaim, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 19).) +- 37. O ember 7 2009, Epstein filed a civil Complaint in this action against and L.M. (12/7/09 Complaint, Jetey Epstein v. Scott tein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 09CA40800XXXM13 (D.E. 5).) +- 39. represented L.M. in this litigation. ( 11/10/17 Depo. 255:5-11.) a +- 40. did not charge L.M. for his representation of her in this litigation. 11/10/17 Depo. 255:12-19; 257:23-258:1.) + +- concerning his representation of her in this litigation. +- 41. did not enter into any written representation 255:20-256:8; 258:2-4.) +- 42. On January 21, 2010, a Default was entered against Rot to all claims in the December 7, 2009, Complaint a ' Default, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15 Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB 29).) +- 43. In early August 2010, L.M. and Epstein e Dismissal With Prejudice as to L.M. I Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et a County, Case No. 502009CA40800 +- 44. On August 9, 2010, the Court to L.M. Only approving L. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott County, Case No. 502 +- 45. On January 5, 2 paragraphs. (1 Scott Rot 502009CA Ad47. ÷ On August 22, 2011, Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint, which was corrected on August 24, 2011, bringing a claim for abuse of process against and for conspiracy to commit abuse of process against Rothstein. (8/22/11 Second Amended Complaint and 8/24/11 Notice of Scrivener's Error and Corrected Second Amended Complaint, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA4080(OOOa4B (D.E. 368, 370).) ement with L.M. 1,1/0/17 Depo. is litigation as stein. (1/21/10 rcuit Court, Palm a Stipulation for Order of , Only. (8/5/10 Stipulation, ial Circuit Court, Palm Beach .E. 112).) SV, nal Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as l~td pstein's Stipulation. (8/9/10 Final Order, tem, et al., 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach 00XXXMB (D.E. 113).) n moved to amend his Complaint, to eliminate certain laintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, Jeffrey Epstein v. 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. (D.E. 195).) +- 46. Oiy ril 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothstein and or abuse of process. (4/12/11 Amended Complaint, Jeffrey Epstein v. Rothstein, et at, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 9CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 303).) + +- 48. On November 3, 2011, moved for Final Summary Judgment on Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. (11/3/11 Renewed Motion for Find Summary Judgment, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al., 15th Judicial Circ ourt, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA40800XXXMB (D.E. 401).) +- 49. appeared in this action as his own co-counsel on the suit against him was dismissed. ( 11/10/1 Notice of Appearance, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothste Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. 502009CA408 +- 50. On July 26, 2012, the Court set the hearing o Summary Judgment to be held on Augus Motion to Reschedule Hearing, Jeffi• Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach (D.E. 512).) +- 51. Epstein dismissed his claim 2012. (8/16/12 Notice o et al., 15th Judie 502009CA40800 +- 52. inco the present than January 20 2012, before :7-22; 3/27/12 Judicial Circuit B (D.E. 468).) ' Renewed Motion for Final (7/26/12 Order on + - v. Scott Rothstein, et at, 15 ase No. 502009CA40800XXXMB our prejudice against on August 16, Dismissal, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Court, Palm Beach County, Case No. . 519).) lawyer has been collective) greater from January 2010 to as from 2002 when started practicing law through wards' 11/10/17 Depo. 47:10-14; 49:4-13.) +- 53. s is not claiming a loss of income as a result of his reputation being injured ps n's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. 10/10/13 Depo. 1-22.) +wards has not seen a doctor or taken any medication as a result of the anxiety caused by this lawsuit. ( ' 5/15/13 Depo. 57:23-58:5; 11/10/17 Depo. 112:11-20.) + +### C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial: + +1. Case Against Rothstein. What, if any, damages were sustained pstein and proximately caused by Rothstein? a does not agree with this langu the reason that the issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Po e. It is a position that failure to limit the issue in this way as to Rothstein has ntial of confusing the jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable ca damages against arising out of the same circumstances.) + +2. Malicious Prosecution Countettcla . e following are issues of fact for determination at trial on a Counterclaim against Epstein: + +> A A. E stein's Position: Whether in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil p ding against ME, the facts and circumstances known to Epstein , ere not sufficient) strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against was supported by existing facts and, thus, Ep rein didliet have probable cause to institute his civil proceeding. (This Ion the Standard Jury Instruction, but disputes it is appropriate.) + +wards' Alternate Position: Whether in December 2009, when Epstein instituted his civil proceeding against the facts and circumstances known to Epstein were insufficient to su port a belief on the part of a reasonably cautious person that had engaged in conduct that supported Epstein's claims against (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction. The parties agree that, in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether probable cause existed tostakt the institution of the civil proceeding brought by Epstein against is an issue of law to be determined by the Court.) + +B. iran If had probable cause to initiate the original civil proceeding against at the time the case was initially filed, whether a reasonably cautious person would have continued to prosecute the civil proceeding + +against [REDACTED], based on new information acquired by Epstein after the case was filed. (The parties agree that in the absence of material disputed facts, the issue of whether Epstein's claim against [REDACTED] was maintained when probable cause no longer existed is an issue to be determined by the Court.) + +C. Epstein's Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against [REDACTED] maliciously and without probable cause for the primary purpose of injuring [REDACTED] or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding was justified. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Instruction, but [REDACTED] disputes it is appropriate.) + +[REDACTED] Alternate Position: Whether Epstein instituted or continued his civil proceeding against Edwards with legal and/or actual malice. (Epstein disputes this issue because it does not follow the Standard Jury Instruction.) + +D. Epstein's Position: Whether the continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from Epstein's actions and, but for Epstein's actions, the proceeding would not have been continued. ([REDACTED] disagrees that this is an issue and is of the position that, having conceded that Epstein is responsible for initiating the claim, and having waived any "advice of counsel" defense, it is impossible for Epstein to contend that responsibility for maintenance of the action up until the time of its voluntary dismissal is attributable to anyone but Epstein himself.) + +E. Whether Epstein's civil proceeding against [REDACTED] was terminated in favor of [REDACTED]. ([REDACTED] contends this is a legal issue for determination by the Court.) + +F. Whether the institution or continuation of the civil proceeding by Epstein against [REDACTED] was a substantial contributing cause of damage to [REDACTED] and, but for the malicious institution or continuation of the proceeding, [REDACTED] damage would not have occurred. + +G. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate [REDACTED] for his compensatory damages that resulted from Epstein's institution or continuation of the civil proceeding against [REDACTED]. + +- D. Exhibit Lists (with OW Exhibit Lists and to ide disclosed and/or provid +- H. Whether Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduc reckless disregard or gross negligence which was a substantial cause of d: ages. +- I. Whether punitive damages are warranted as punislune in for instituting or continuing his civil proceeding against ds d/or as a deterrent to others from filing a civil proceeding wi ble cause. +- J. Whether the claimed damage is a result of state made after the institution of the civil proceeding and are thu ro ted by the litigation privilege, even if any such statements to untrue. (This issue is based on the Standard Jury Ins ut disputes it is appropriate because he believe Amended Complaints are "statements made after the i ut the civil proceeding" and are afforded no protection by th privilege.) +- K. Bifurcated Proceeding: ount, if any, should be assessed against Epstein for punitive damages 7 a punishment for instituting or continuing his civil proceed\* againsPEdwards and/or as a deterrent to others. Nile parties do not waive their right to amend their onal objections for those exhibits that have not yet been rrespond with the parties' respective Exhibit Lists. + - I. 't List and Epstein's Objections are attached as Composite Exc. + - 2. ein Exhibit List and Objections are attached as Composite it B. +- E. Lists: The parties do not waive their right to amend their Witness Lists. Witness List is attached as Exhibit C. + - 2. Epstein's Witness List is attached as Exhibit D. +- F. Estimated Trial Time: estimates 10 trial days; Epstein estimates 15-20 trial days. + +### G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case: + +For Jeffrey Epstein: Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 727-3600 + +For J. Jack Scarola David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev 41. A Telephone: (561) 686-6300 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +### H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three. + +### 1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to supporting authorities + +- sed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite Exhi it E. +- 2. proposed jury instructions and verdict form are attached as Composite bi F. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein and* [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Joint Pretrial Stipulation +Page 14 + +DATED: December 22, 2017. + +SEARCY, DENNY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +(561) 686-6300; (561) 383-9451 [fax] + +![]()LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link, with permission +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +NOTA CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT C + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG and J. individually. + +Defendants. + +JUDGE: HAMLET + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S tr. a) i RIAL EXHIBITS, TRIAL WITNESSES AND EXPERT W + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstci ). files his list of trial exhibits, trial witnesses, and expert witnesses puts ant s Court's Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and Mediation P follows: + +### TRIAL + +- 1. Information Charging S othstein in United States of America v. Stott W. Rothstein, 09-6033I-CR-C December 1, 2009. +- 2. Plea Agreemen we United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed 1, 2009. +- 3. Amended taint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., i the. Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, El Case No. 09-062943 (19). +- 4. 11 Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in in re: Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P:.,.!9- 91-RBR and any and all ancillary cases related thereto, including, but not li l d h Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09- 062 +- 5. The videotaped deposition and all exhibits as referenced/used in the Deposition of Scott W. Rothstein taken by Epstein on June 14, 2012. +- 6. Privilege Log of Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, Dated February 23, 2011 as filed in this matter and in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A.; 09-34791-RBR. + - 7. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. + +8. Any and all exhibits listed and/or used by J. + +9. All Depositions taken of J. in the case and chief and the Counterclaim in this matter, via videotape or transcription, including all exhibits used/referenced therein. + +10. All documents and exhibits provided by J. in this matter. + +11. Transcripts of all depositions taken in the Plaintiff/Counter-Defen nt's case in chief and the Counterclaim filed by .1. including al pits marked at said depositions. + +12. All of Answers to Interrogatories, Respons ests for Production, and Response to Requests for Admissions. + +13. Complaints and Docket from L.M. v. Jeffrey ; 09-CV-81092- CORN; and 502008 CA 018051 XXXXMB. + +14. Subpoena(s)/Notice(s) for Deposition rump, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Mark Epstein. + +15. Subpoena to Leonard Baird. + +16. Notices to produce med' o e to Charles J. Galecki, M.D., Bruce W. Markowitz, M.U. and Steven I2. AI er, .D. + +17. Any and all e ments/pleadings referenced in Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment as s Counterclaim. + +18. Deposition ck (John) Scarola dated July 2, 2013 taken in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeld der, A; 09-34791-RBR. + +19.4 2A Directory dated October 23, 2009. + +nan + 9 eerishots of the Jaffe Weissing firm website in which Epstein's + +. Screenshots of the Jaffe Weissing firm, including its attorneys' Fa hook pages, and other social media, in which Epstein's name appears. + +The Defendants reserve the right to produce any newly discovered evidence upon proper notice. + +The Defendants reserve the right to produce any exhibits used for impeachment or rebuttal. + +The Defendants reserve the right to amend and/or supplement this Exhibit List as information becomes available upon proper notice. + +All exhibits expected to be offered at trial by the Defendants, except thos used for impeachment, will be made available for inspection at the offices of th 5R ,rsi ed at a mutually convenient time and date. + +### TRIAL WITNESSES + +- 1. Scott W. Rothstein do Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- 2. Ken Jenne do Broward Co. Sheriff 2601 W. Broward El Ft. Lauderdale, FL +- 3. William cdrd(1) Sch e do Conra Scl c r, LLP PB Box 14 Ft. Lid , FL 33302-4723 +- 4. uvin o Law Office of Craig Goldenfarb, P.A. O 0 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 402 West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6512 Katherine Ezell do Podhurst Orseck PA 25 W. Flagler St. Miami, FL 33130-1712 +- 6. Anil Eded Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office 1350 NW12th Avenue Miami, FL 33136-2102 + +- 7. Kikka Claudio Address unknown at this time + +- 8. Paul Cassell Barton Petrini, LLP 1320 Columbia Street, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92101-3436 + +- 9. Margaret Berk 5925 Kaiser Lane Pensacola, FL 32507-8319 + +- 10. Mercedes Address unknown at this time + +- 11. Jacquie Address unknown at this time + +- 12. Adam Horowitz do Herman, Mame'stein & 3351 NW Boca Raton 131v Boca Raton, FL 33431- + +- 13. Stuart Mermelste\* do Herman, M & Horowitz, P.A. 3351 NW Bo lvd. Boca Rato 1-6623 + +- 14. Lisa ivent do tomey's Office '.( 10 e9 venue, Suite A 961 s shville, Tennessee 37203 + +Jack Kill Address unknown at this time + +- 6. Carolyn Address unknown at this time + +- 17. Robert Josefberg Address unknown at this time + +- 18. Richard Willits Richard H. Willits, P.A. + +490 Wandering Way Ponte Vedra, FL 32081-0619 + +- 19. William J. Berger Weiss Handler & Cornwell PA 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A Boca Raton, FL 33431-7391 OR Greenspoon Marder PA 100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-2195 +- 20. Ben Patton Address unknown at this time +- 21. Susan K. Stirling Promise Healthcare, Inc. 999 NW 5151 Street Boca Raton, FL 33431-4477 +- 22. Iliana Yarzabal Address unknown at this time +- 23. Barry 6740 Chimere Terra Boynton Beach, +- 24. Allan Garten, U.S. Atto 1000 SW 31 \$nue, Suite 600 Portl d, Oregon 97204-2936 0 life Christina Fitch Address unknown at this time +- 27. G za )11 55 Technology Way, Suite 630 a Raton, FL 33431-3351 Jaffe, Weissing, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Fistos & Lerhman +- 28. Denis Kleinfcld 1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 32nd Floor + +Miami, FL 34905 + +- 29. Steven, Esq. 533 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 +- 30. Carl Linder Linder Law Group 175 SW t h Street, Suite 2410 Miami, FL 33130-2966 Canna 15751 Sheridan Street, PMB 129 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331-3486 +- 31. +- 32. Jonathan Birkman Quraishi & Birkman, PLLC 809 SE 8th Street Deerfield Beach, FL 33441-5608 +- 33. Robert C. Buschel Buschel Gibbons, P.A. 100 SE Third Avenue, Sui Fort Lauderdale, FL 33 +- 34. Beth Williamson 1306 Cormoran Delray Bea +- 35. Mike Fiste Blue tie Investigations 1376 4State Road #84 tide 4 ie, Florida 33325 -3328 sh Kirschbaum, Birnbaum, Lippman, & Gregoire 1301 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 230 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2111 +- 37. Robin T. Kempner Address unknown at this time +- 38. Pat— Address unknown at this time +- 39. Amy Swan + +Address unknown at this time + +- 40. Pat-Drug Enforcement Administration 2100 N. Commerce Parkway Weston, FL 33326-3234 +- 41. Jeffrey Sonn Broward Financial Centre 500 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394-3055 +- 42. Tami Wolfe Morrow, Milberg & Wolfe 499 NW 70th Avenue, Suite 108 Plantation, FL 33317-7572 +- 43. Steven Jaffee Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Fisto Le li tan 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 +- 44. Marc Nurik do Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc One E. Broward El Ft. Lauderdale, +- 45. Nora Batia Address u at this time +- 46. Nisei scimento unknown at this time Ci bel Matiska Address unknown at this time +8. Michael Wheeler Department of Juvenile Justice 2737 Centerview Drive, Suite 3220 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0999 00 + - 49. Berger Address unknown at this time + - 50. Shawn Gilbert + +Address unknown at this time + +- 51. Ronald Wise Address unknown at this time + +- 52. Wayne Black Address unknown at this time + +- 53. Preve Banyon Funding, LLC 2455 E. Sunrise Blvd., Penthouse Suite + +- 54. Kendall Coffey Coffey Burlington PL 2699 S. Bayshore Dr., Penthouse Miami, FL 33133-5408 + +- 55. ilichrman Jaffe Weissing Fis 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3 + +- 56. Phaedra Xanthos Address unknown at thi + +- 57. Scott Address unkn + +- 58. Alfredo R Address u + +- 59. Earl to ubic raper kE. Broward Blvd., Suite 1600 rt Lauderdale, FL 33301-1845 + +Ted Morse Morse Operations 1240 N Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 + +- 61. Carolyn, Legal Assistant to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel Jay Howell & Associates, PA 6444 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211-3108 + +- 62. Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates, PA 6444 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211-3108 +- 63. Alan Sakowtiz 1135 Kane Concourse, Floor 3 Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025 +- 64. A. J. Discala Canvas Financial, LLC 303 Park Avenue South, Suite 1401 New York, NY 10001-0646 +- 65. Thane Ritchie Address unknown at this time +- 66. Kretschmar Address unknown at this time +- 67. Michael Legamaro Address unknown at this +- 68. Debra Address unknown a +- 69. Levi Address u this time +- 70. Lind t Von Amen Add known at this time +- 71. ace Zimet, Esq. O nancial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +- J. Jaffe Weissing Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 73 . John Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +Go + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +- 74. Jeffrey Epstein c/o Tonja Haddad, PA 315 SE t h Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +- 75. Any and all witnesses listed by J. + +witnesses upon proper notice. AS Epstein reserves the right to list and/or call any and all ne ( 5 covered + +Epstein reserves the right to call and/or produce any and a dresses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal. + +Epstein reserves the right to amend and/or ent this Witness List upon proper notice to the Parties and this Court. + +### EXP EL14WJTNESSES + +++ Unknown at this time, b in will amend upon proper review of all documents and discovery • er and will properly provide the name and address of same as per the Trial C + +WE HEREB T1FY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all pasted below, via Electronic Service, this August 15, 2016. + +> /s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com + +### Electronic Service List + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Seamy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JSX@SearcyLaw.com; MEP@Searcylaw.com + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com + +J. Es Jaffe Weissing Fistos 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 staff.efile@pathtojustice.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. A 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 13301 Dee@FredHaddad apm + +Tonja Had oleman, Esquire Tonja@tontah Agd.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Law,Okcepf Tonja Haddad, P.A. treet, Suite 301 INciniffierdale, e FL 33301 + +W. Chester =, Jr. Wcblaw@aol.conr wcbcg@aol.com W. Chester Jr., P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +# EXHIBIT D + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually. + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408005OOOCMBAG + +JUDGE: HAFELE + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEINS SUPPLEMENTING HIS EXHIBIT LIST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein' Iles the following amendment/addition to his exhibit list: + +1. GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO RAW ITS MOTION FOR United States of America v. Scott W. Rothst ' a 0331 COHN. REDUCTION OF SENTENCE OF SCOTT , dated September 26, 2017. 94sr. + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY th d correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below, v,. me Service, this September 28, 2017. + +> Is/ Tonia Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE t h Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.467.1223 954.337.3716 (facsimile) Tonja@TonjaHaddad.com Efiling@TonjaHaddad.com + +### Electronic Service List. + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Seamy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JSX@Searcylaw.com; MEP@Searcylaw.com + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jgoldberger@agwpa.com + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nurilclaw.com + +J. Jaffe Weiss'Es in t Fiatos Lett 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 stattefile@pathtojustice.com + +Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 26 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330 Dee@FredHaddadLaw.co + +Tonja Haddad Cole= "Esquire Tonja@tonjahaddad.cpm; cfiling@tonjahaddad.com Law OfficeaKonja lIaddad, P.A. 315 SEiltfuktrckj;Suite 301 Fort tida\*, FL 33301 + +—4-et W. ghester , Jr. Wcblaw@ao.conv l wcbcg@aol.com W. Chester =I Jr., P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +# **EXHIBIT E** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_56_Picture_0.jpeg) + +# ION & RQCKENBACH, PA. + +CIVIL TRIAL &APPELLATS LAW + +November 9, 2017 + +### VIA HAND DELIVERY + +Jack Scarola. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 T 561.727.3600 F 561.727.3601 + +Scott J. Link scotittnkincliaw.com + +RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15111 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Dear Jack: + +I am enclosing a flash drive of Plainti 'al iibits. We have been trying to piece the file together from our co-counsel, but have been unable locate everything identified. Many of the items listed, however, I am sure you already, have in your files. Nevertheless, we wanted to point out the following: + +> Ex. 3 Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC v. Scott W. Rothstein. We are currently working on securing the exhibits to the Amended Complaint, which we intend to include as part of our exhibit. E 0 Scott W. Rothstein's testimony in Razorback Funding, LLC v. Rothstein, Case No. 09-62943 and In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Case No. 09-34791-RBR. The flash drive contains excerpts of Mr. Rothstein's testimony. We do not waive our right to use other portions of Mr. Rothstein's testimony to the extent we can locate the full transcripts. Ex. 5 Scott W. Rothstein's June 14, 2012, deposition in this matter. We intend to rely on the video of Mr. Rothstein's deposition in addition to his transcript and exhibits. Currently, we do not have the video in our possession. Ex. 9 Depositions of in this matter. We are still working on locating the exhibits to Mr. March 23, 2010, deposition and the video of his May 15, 2013, deposition. We intend to rely on all deposition transcripts and videos of Mr. + +in this case along with documents identified as exhibits at his depositions. This includes any exhibits marked at his deposition tomorrow (or future depositions). To the extent you have the exhibits to Mr. March 23, 2010, deposition, we ask that you share them with us. + +Ex. 10 Documents produced by Mr. a. To the extent the Court grants our Motion to Compel and compels Mr. Edwards to produce any additional documents, we may rely on those documents at trial as well. Ex. 11 Transcripts and exhibits of all depositions taken by Plaintiff. We have not yet located all of the deposition exhibits, but we may rely on them at trial. To the extent you have the deposition exhibits, we ask that you share them with us. Ex. 12 Mr. discovery responses. To the extent Mr. serves any additional discovery responses or amends any responses, those will be used as exhibits at trial. Ex. 14 Subpoenas. We are still looking for the Subpoenas/Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz and David Copperfield. To the extent you have those in your possession, we ask that you share them with us. Ex. 15 Subpoena. We are still looking for the Subpoena for Leonard Baird. To the extent you have that in your possession, we ask that you are, that with us. y and all exhibits, documents and pleadings referenced in Mr. O pstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. We have included the items from the Appendix to Mr. Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. To the extent other items are referenced in the Motion, we may rely on those as well. Ex. 18 Deposition of Jack Scarola in In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Case No. 09-34791-RBR. We have not yet located the exhibits to Jack's deposition, but we may use them at trial. To the extent that you have them, we ask that you share them with us. Ex. 21 Jaffee Social Media. We have not yet located these items in our co-counsel's files, but we will supplement this disclosure once we have located those documents. + +As we locate the missing items above we will share them with you. After the Court rules on the outstanding Motions, we have taken Mr. deposition, and we have reviewed Mr. Critton's files, we believe we may need to amend Plaintiff's Exhibit List. + +SJL/tle Enclosure + +cos 4s) + +# EXHIBIT F + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND Y EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EXIABJ + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey is E 'SS1 Ny files this list of the trial exhibits he may introduce at the trial of this matter. + +### OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objection 5. Privileged +- 1. All objections 6. Opinion +- 2. All objectio cept thenticity 7. Hearsay +- 3. Irreleva or i aterial 8. Authenticity lacking +- 4. P value substantially outweighed 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) by d r of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, Appendix in Support and all documents cited therein | | | | +| 11 | Misc. | All deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (3/23/10; 5/15/13; 10/10/13; 11/10/17)
b. Jeffrey Epstein (3/17/10; 1/25/12)
c. Scott Rothstein (6/14/12)
d. [REDACTED] Adler (4/20/11)
e. Abrakas Joseph Di [REDACTED] (5/25/11)
f. [REDACTED] Russell Kretschmar (2/11/11)
g. Michael Legamaro (3/11/11)
h. Courtney Wild (10/12/17) | | | | +| 12 | Misc. | Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Answers, Responses, Objections and Privilege Logs in response to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Requests for Production, and Subpoenas Duces Tecum | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits | | | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | | | | +| State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit | | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of [REDACTED] | | | | +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statements provided in the matter | | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 18 | Misc. | Court docket and all court filings referenced therein | | | | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | | | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | | +| 23 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | | | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) [REDACTED] Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | | | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | | | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second [REDACTED] ded Complaint | | | | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. L.M. (9/24/09; 2/9/10) | | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 | | | | | | +| 30 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 31 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial | | | | +| 32 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | | | | +| 33 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 34 | | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | | | | +| E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 0 ' | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissi | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcrip b d | + +### Ja v. effrey Epstein USDC . ase No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | | | | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | | | | +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 63 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein + +### 17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +|----|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| | | | | | | + +## 0 .' In re Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, PA + +### USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
  1. Scott W. Rothstein (12/12/11);
  2. Jack (John) Scarola's (7/2/13); and
  3. [REDACTED] Adler (10/28/10).
| | | | +| | | | | | | + +### United Pr f America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action + +### DC Ha. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 75 | 11/9/09 | V | Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|----|----------|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| 76 | 11/23/09 | A mend | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| | | D.E. | 14 | +| 77 | 11/2 | „Amended Verified Complaint for | Forfeiture in Rem | + +### The Florida Bar Matters + +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquilinplaint Form Jeffrey | +|----|----------|-----------------------------------------------| +| | | Epstein filed against J. , William | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] ; James [REDACTED]; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket, all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to:
a. Scott W. Rothstein's testimony (12/12/11, 12/19/11, 12/20/11, 12/21/11, 12/22/11) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler – Communication | | | | | | +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620) | | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446) | | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | | +| 92 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05725) | | | | +| 93 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russel Adler (01574) | | | | +| 94 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 95 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 96 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 97 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail from Timothy Malloy to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05151) | | | | +| 98 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05161) | | | | +| 99 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 100 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail from William J Berger to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] Adler and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01735) | | | | +| 101 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 102 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 103 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 104 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 105 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05239) | | | | +| 106 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 107 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 108 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 109 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 110 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 111 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 112 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 119 | 7/4/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. Edwards (05803) | | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. Edwards re c [REDACTED] noticing depositions | | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (03070) | | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. Edwards (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat [REDACTED] and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02595-02596) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards
(07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards
(07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED]
(07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED]
(07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED]
(07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
(07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07689-07691) | | | | +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Elizabeth Villar,
cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler
(01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
(01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer
Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos [REDACTED] (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. Edwards (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to Conchita Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail from Bradley J. Edwards to Nigel Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Russell Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, Bradley J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie Johnson (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE00000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Search Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED] Attorneys/id/3/read) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. Edwards: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 242 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-[REDACTED]/#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achieved-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 246 | 8/10/16 | [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | Farmer, Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
█████ J. █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
█████ J. █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. █████ J. █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. █████ J. █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. █████ J. █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. █████ Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley
█████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | █████ J. █████; Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
█████ █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v.
█████ █████; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad █████ & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 275 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited | +| sLial | ilitiCompany for The Law Office of Brad | +| 276 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability CcmuLti Annual Report for | +| The Law Office of Brad | and Associates | +| 277 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Com , an Annual Report for | +| The Law Office of Brad | and Associates | +| 278 | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, | +| Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | ,COA | +| 279 3/3/08 Complaint; | Donald D. Baker v. The City of | +| Hollywood, et at; | Case No. 08-60294-C1V-RUCK | +| 280 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; | +| 281 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D a r | + +### ,ero + +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's | (1;7, Re , • rt with | +|-----|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 284 | Misc. | All documents pro | o lied upon or | +| | | referenced by D Bern | . Jansen in preparing his | +| 285 | 9/9/16 | Expert Wi | Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in | +| | | Virginia GI | . Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | +| 286 | 11/30/16 | Sup | enta Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard | +| | | J. | in v. Ghislaine Maxwell | +| 287 | Misc. die | 4 , blic records, news articles and prior testimony | | + +### Other Articles + +| 288 | 11/1/09 | Kendall | Coffey: Law Finn Victimized by Scott | +|-----|---------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| 289 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. | WSJ Law Blog — Rothstein | +| 290 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. | Chief Judge: | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 291 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 292 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 293 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 294 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 295 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 296 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 297 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 298 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | | | | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel . 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by the Florida Bar | | | | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal . A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | | | | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar . Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | | | | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes . Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | | | | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News . Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Bradley J. [REDACTED] and any witnesses listed by either party | | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of [REDACTED] exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2017, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant* +*Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Tonja Haddad Coleman
315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
tonja@tonjahaddad.com
efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Fred Haddad
Haddad & Navarro, PLLC
1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
dee@haddadandnavarrolaw.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT G + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### VIA HAND DELIVERY + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +> RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15111 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Dear Jack: + +Scott J. Link stotleinkrocklaw.com + +December 19, 2017 + +Pursuant to the Court's Order on Mr. Edwards' Motion to Compel Payment of Deposition Expenses, I am enclosing our firm's check in the amount of \$400 payable to Searcy, Denny. + +In addition, with regard to our exhibits, I am enclosing a flash drive of those documents identified on our November 16, 2017, Illided Exhibit List. In light of the Court's recent rulings, we anticipate amending our Exhibit List after we have had an opportunity to review Mr. Epstein's former counsels' files. + +Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. + +( Si + ++0 + +SJL/tic Enclosure Scott + +# EXHIBIT H + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_87_Picture_0.jpeg) + +### VIA HAND DELIVERY + +Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 jsx@scarcylaw.com + +> RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. 1511' Judicial Circuit Case No. 50- 00c4140800XXXXNIBAG + +Dear Jack: + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, R 33401 TEL (561) 727-3600 I FAX (561) 727-3601 + +February 2, 2018 + +I am enclosing a flash drive condinin additional documents for our trial Exhibit Nos. 18, 35, 48, 323, and 324. We are still obtaining additional public records and will provide those to you upon our receipt. + +SJIJtic \*ssaSi Enclosure + +Scott J. Link + +# EXHIBIT I + +NOT A CERTIFICATE COPY + +**From:** Tina L. [REDACTED] +**To:** Jack Scarola; David P. Vitale Jr.; brad@eplic.com; njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +**Cc:** Mary McCann; Kimberly Marsh; Kara Berard Rockenbach; Scott J. Link; Chris R. Rodgers; Scott J. Link +**Subject:** Epstein v. [REDACTED] +**Date:** Friday, February 16, 2018 1:56:18 PM +**Attachments:** [323 A-10 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 A-15 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 A-26 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 A-31 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 A-34 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 A-35 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 B-36 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 B-41 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 C-35 Supp.pdf](#) +[323 C-41 Supp.pdf](#) + +--- + +I am attaching supplemental public record Trial Exhibits for Ex. 323. + +Thank you. + +**Tina** [REDACTED], CP/FRP + +Certified Paralegal + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +office (561) 727-3600 | fax (561) 727-3601 | Email: [tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:tina@linkrocklaw.com) + +--- + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it is not meant for you, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communications because email deliveries may be delayed or unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communications may not be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. + +# EXHIBIT J + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +From: rilla To: JAZLECilgurt David F. MO lr • StalaDliellaSSULISQM; DDELSIPACD202 Cc: • • Mra Renard Ftnrkentwir Mon' WarnEdthedataaa Subject: Epstein v. - Trial Exhibits Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 7:13:34 PM + +I am attaching additional trial exhibits from our general categories at the following link: + +httos://www droobox co + +We will be supplying our Clerk's Exhibit List shortly. + +Thank you + +Tina ME, CP/FRP + +Certified Paralegal + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 office (561) 727-3600 I fax (561) 727.3601 I Email: thaZlinkomalawmall + +This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If it immediately. Please confirm receipt of time sensitive communica unsuccessful. We do not provide tax advice. Our communl imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. norm 16r you, please delete it and notify us e email deliveries may be delayed or t be relied upon to avoid penalties that may be + +G"¢ + +# EXHIBIT K + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Cos + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S CLERK'S TRIAL 1ST + +Plaintiffitounter-Defendant Jeffrey E e cp suant to (1) paragraph G of the Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting T jng the parties to agree to amend their Exhibit Lists, (2) the parties' December 22, 2 'retrial Stipulation which provided the parties did not waive their right to amend th' Lists, and (3) the Clerk's guidelines on pre-marking exhibits which require each e •e identified individually, hereby files this Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to set forth i t 'vidual y those items previously contained in general categories. + +### INDEX TO OBJECTIONS + +- O. No Objec6S +- 1. All o +- 2. All ob ions, except authenticity +- 3. Irrelevant or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 1 | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 3 | 1/21/10 | Default against Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 4 | 8/2/10
8/9/10 | Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only | | | | +| 5 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10-1 | N/D | Index of Appendix Items to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 10A | 1/9/13 | Fourth Amended Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10B | 7/31/12 | Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to [REDACTED] Counterclaim - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10C | 3/23/10 | Transcript of Deposition of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10D | 12/12/11 | Excerpts of Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein - In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 09-34791 | | | | +| 10F | 12/1/09 | Information - United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 10G | N/D | Court Docket - L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051-XXXX-MB | | | | +| 10H | N/D | Court Docket - E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXX-MB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10I-1 | 6/19/09 | Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 10I-2 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 10I-3 | 7/23/09 | Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment – Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/ | | | | +| 10I-4 | 10/16/09 | Jane Doe's Notice That Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly and Motion for Consideration by the Court of Materials in Docket Numbers 282 and 283 in Determining Motion for Appointment of a Receiver Restraining Fraudulent Assets Transfers and Incorporated Memorandum of Law – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10I-5 | N/D | Court Docket – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10J | 3/17/10 | Transcript of Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10K | 11/09 | Amended Complaint (without exhibits) – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10L-1 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | | | | +| 10L-2 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal – A Year After Rothstein, Many Questions Unanswered | | | | +| 10L-3 | 1/13/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Lawyers from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10L-4 | 7/10 | Sun-Sentinel – Latest Rothstein Updates – 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by The Florida Bar | | | | +| 10M-1 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Adam D. Horowitz, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Jeffrey Marc Herman, Katherine Ezell, Robert C. Josefsberg and Jack [REDACTED] | | | | +| 10M-2 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-1 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Video Deposition of Leslie Wexler and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-2 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Glenn [REDACTED] and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-3 | 7/28/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-4 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-5 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-6 | 8/11/09 | Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Mark Epstein and Subpoena – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-7 | 8/11/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-8 | 8/10/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 10N-9 | 8/24/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Donald Trump – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-10 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-11 | 9/2/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-12 | 10/16/09 | Re-Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-13 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael [REDACTED] – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10N-14 | 10/22/09 | Subpoena to Testify at Deposition to Michael Sanka – Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | +| 10O | 12/7/09 | Complaint (without exhibits) - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 10P | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement – United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331-CR-COHN | | | | +| 10Q | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 10R | N/D | Brad Edwards Privilege Log of Emails Dated November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 10S | Misc. | Documents Produced Responsive to Order (individual items identified separately below) | | | | +| 10T | 7/24/09 | Complaint – L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092-Cohn-Seltzer | | | | +| 10U | 11/5/09 | Order - Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (consolidated action) , USDC S.D. Florida Case No. 08-CV-80119-Marra/[REDACTED] | | | | +| 10V | 7/29/09 | Email from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 10W | 12/12/11 | Excerpt of Transcript of Deposition of Scott Rothstein – Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. , 17 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 09-062943 | | | | +| 10X | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description | Objection Marked | +|--------|----------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------| +| 11A-1 | 3/23/10 | | Deposition Transcript of | J. | +| 11A-2 | 5/15/13 | | Deposition Transcript of | J. with | +| | | 15th | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | | +| 11A-3 | 10/10/13 | | Deposition Transcript of | J. (Ex. 1 | +| | | et at, 151° | Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA | | +| 11A-3a | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3b | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Le | +| 11A-3c | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Ann Maltea4na | +| 11A-3d | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Ann e | +| 11A-3e | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | Villaf | a o | +| 11A-3f | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villa | L. M. | +| 11A-3g | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | | | +| 11A-3h | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | | Eisenberg | +| 11A-3i | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. | o e Doe | | +| 11A-3j | 7/9/08 | Letter from A | an | lafana to Brad | +| 11A-3k | 7/9/08 | Letter from A. | ' Villafana to Brad | | +| 11A-31 | 3/20/11 | | Letter f rpmR. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | | +| 11A-3m | 12/10/10 | IAtier fro | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3n | 3/22/11 | tter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3o | | tter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 11A-3p | 3/15/ 1 | | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell | | +| 11A-3q | 10/9/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 11A-3r | 9/29/11 | | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | | +| 11A-3s | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3t | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Ann C. | +| 11A-3u | 10/15/08 | Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 11A-4 | 11/10/17 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11B-1 | 3/17/10 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11B-2 | 1/25/12 | Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibit identified below) | | | | +| 11C | 6/14/12 | Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (individual exhibits identified below) | | | | +| 11D | 4/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] S. Adler - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11E | 5/25/11 | Deposition Transcript of Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala with exhibits - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11F | 2/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Dean [REDACTED] Kretschmar - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11G | 3/11/11 | Deposition Transcript of Michael Legamaro - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11H | 10/12/17 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB (exhibits listed as follows) | | | | +| 11H-1 | 8/7/07
8/14/07 | FBI Report – E.W. | | | | +| 11I | 12/1/17 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | +| 11J | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger - - Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 12A | 12/4/10 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12B | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12C | 5/11/10 | [REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production | | | | +| 12D | 6/21/10 | Epstein's Request for Admissions to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12E | 7/7/10 | [REDACTED] Response to First Request for Admissions | | | | +| 12F | 4/7/11 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12G | 5/5/11 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce dated April 7, 2011 | | | | +| 12H | 5/16/11 | Epstein's Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12I | 6/10/11 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12J | 12/9/11 | Epstein's Second Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12K | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's Third Set of Interrogatories | | | | +| 12L | 6/1/12 | [REDACTED] Response to Request for Production | | | | +| 12M | 2/21/13 | [REDACTED] Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011 | | | | +| 12N | 7/25/13 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated June 25, 2013 | | | | +| 12O | 8/11/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 12P | 9/5/17 | Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12Q | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Interrogatories | | | | +| 12R | 10/5/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production | | | | +| 12S | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12T | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to [REDACTED] | | | | +| 12U | 11/13/17 | Edwards' Answers to Epstein's Expert Interrogatories | | | | +| 12V | 11/13/17 | [REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce re Experts | | | | +| 12W | N/D | [REDACTED] Privilege Log – Emails November 2009 to August 2010 | | | | +| 13 | Misc. | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 13-1 | 4/9/09
3:50 p.m. | E-mail chain – from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (02645) | | | | +| 13-2 | 4/22/09
9:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03037) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-3 | 4/24/09
11:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Adler to Steven Jaffe, ██████, William Berger, Barry ██████, Scott Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Carl Linder and Robert Buschel (03036) | | | | +| 13-4 | 4/26/09
7:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Radler to ██████ (00149) | | | | +| 13-5 | 4/27/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Marc Nurik (01527) | | | | +| 13-6 | 4/28/09
6:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Katherine Ezell (4493-4495) | | | | +| 13-7 | 5/1/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Rob to ██████ (00014) | | | | +| 13-8 | 5/13/09
1:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (03988-04000) | | | | +| 13-9 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (02231) | | | | +| 13-10 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to Bradley ██████ and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 13-11 | 5/28/09
5:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to ██████ (00090) | | | | +| 13-12 | 5/29/09
5:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Eric Glasser to Bradley ██████ (2906-2908) | | | | +| 13-13 | 6/3/09
11:47 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to ██████ (00133) | | | | +| 13-14 | 6/3/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Wayne Black (11237) | | | | +| 13-15 | 6/3/09
6:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Wayne Black to ██████ (08006) | | | | +| 13-16 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | +| 13-17 | 7/13/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Paul Cassell to ██████ Edwards (00026) | | | | +| 13-18 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 13-19 | 7/14/09
2:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (01004) | | | | +| 13-20 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 13-21 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to ██████ Adler (02684-02685) | | | | +| 13-22 | 7/20/09
1:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (01475) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-------|------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 13-23 | 7/31/09 | E-mail chain - from Jacquie to | +| | 3:40 p.m. | 05087 | +| 13-24 | 8/2/09 | E-mail chain - from to William | +| | 1:15 p.m. | Berger (03694) | +| 13-25 | 8/3/09 | E-mail chain — from Beth to Carl Linder (12289) | +| 13-26 | 8/3/09 | E-mail chain - from to | +| | 7:37 p.m. | 0 1— | +| 13-27 | 8/6/09 | E-mail chain — from to William | +| | 2:21 p.m. | Berger (01258 | +| 13-28 | 8/10/09 | E-mail chain - from to Jacquie | +| | 5:44 p.m. | 15113-15114 | +| 13-29 | 8/10/09 | E-mail chain - from to Jacquie | +| | 5:56 p.m. | (00158) | +| 13-30 | 8/11/09 | E-mail chain - from Marc Nurik to Scott | +| | 9:26 p.m. | (26481) | +| 13-31 | 8/12/09 | E-mail chain - from Priscilla Nasci et tt | +| | 9:43 a.m. | Rothstein (26394 | +| 13-32 | 8/13/09 | E-mail chain - froni 7MEd r to nscila | +| | 9:48 a.m. | Nascimento (08412) | +| 13-33 | 8/13/09 | E-mail chain - from Prised a ci ento to Scott | +| | 9:51 a.m. | Rothstein (25922) | +| 13-34 | 8/13/09 | E-mail chain - fro a nk to Scott Rothstein | +| | 4:51 p.m. | (26480) | +| 13-35 | 8/13/09 | E-mail chain m 11 Adler to Scott | +| | 5:31 p.m. | Rothstein (26 | +| 13-36 | 8/13/09 | E-mail n - from Marc Nurik to Scott Rothstein | +| | 6:02 p.m. | (26570) | +| 13-37 | 8/21/09 | E it ch ' - from to Jacquie | +| | 4:33 p.m. | o on (00992) | +| 13-38 | 8/24/09 | a chain - from Mike Fisten to | +| | 7:46 | ards, Ken Jenne, Cara and Pat | +| 13-39 | 8/2 | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to | +| | 9:50 p. . | Mike Fisten, Cara and Pat | +| 13-40 | 8/24/09 | E-mail chain - from to William | +| | 10:44 p.m. | Berger (01423) | +| 13-41 | 8/25/09 | E-mail chain — from William Berger to | +| | 8:58 a.m. | 05071 | +| 13-42 | 8/26/09 | E-mail chain - from Jacquie to | +| | 5:23 • .m. | (01406) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 13-64 | 10/16/09
11:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Wheeler to Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (01255) | | | | +| 13-65 | 10/16/09
3:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Preve and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26836-26837) | | | | +| 13-66 | 10/17/09
1:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (04398-04402) | | | | +| 13-67 | 10/17/09
1:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassel (04408-04412) | | | | +| 13-68 | 10/17/09
4:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26807) | | | | +| 13-69 | 10/17/09
4:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26808-26809) | | | | +| 13-70 | 10/18/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (27379) | | | | +| 13-71 | 10/19/09
10:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27293) | | | | +| 13-72 | 10/19/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26021 with attachment) | | | | +| 13-73 | 10/19/09
4:32 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Preve, D. Von Allmen and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (27270) | | | | +| 13-74 | 10/20/09
8:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27355) | | | | +| 13-75 | 10/20/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27325) | | | | +| 13-76 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 13-77 | 10/20/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to Chris Podaras (27322) | | | | +| 13-78 | 10/20/09
5:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Podaras to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Frank Prieve (26777-26781) | | | | +| 13-79 | 10/20/09
5:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Podaras, [REDACTED] Kretschmar, A.J. Discala and Prieve (26782-26786) | | | | +| 13-80 | 10/21/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Podaras (26088-26089) | | | | +| 13-81 | 10/21/09
2:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (25998) | | | | +| 13-82 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 13-83 10/22/09 | E-mail chain — from A.J. Discala to Scott | | +| 1:24 p.m. | Rothstein, | Podaras and | +| 13-84 10/22/09 | E-mail chain - from1M | to Jacquie | +| 1:48 p.m. | | 0499 | +| 13-85 10/22/09 | E-mail chain — from | Podaras to Thane | +| 2:47 p.m. | Ritchie, Scott Rothstein, A.J. Discala and - | | +| | Kretschmar (Legamaro Depo. Ex. 6) | 4... | +| 13-86 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Matthew Weiss | to Mark | +| 11:37 a.m. | Fistos, | Adler, Scott | +| 13-87 10/23/09 | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein | | +| 11:40 a.m. | (26477) | | +| 13-88 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Matthew Weissing to M | | +| 12:11 p.m. | Fistos and | (08042-08 | +| 13-89 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from | J. Edwa | +| 12:12 p.m. | Rothstein, Steven Jaffe and Mark Fist | ( | +| | 26742) | 77 | +| 13-90 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from | toMatthew | +| 12:16 p.m. | Weissing (08059-08061) | | +| 13-91 10/23/09 | E-mail chain - from Ja | illt• J. 40 to | +| 12:17 p.m. | | William Ber 4 ndRe eat Buschel | +| 13-92 10/23/09 | E-mail chain - | . Rothstein to A.J. | +| 12:18 ..m. | Discala and D | mar 27522 | +| 13-93 10/23/09 | E-mail chain | o radley to Scott | +| 12:27 p.m. | Rothste. | Steven affe and Mark Fistos (26756- | +| 13-94 10/23/09 | E ee. it ch | ' — from to Mark | +| 12:36 p.m. | | i 08036-08038) | +| 13-95 10/23/I ' | | chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | +| 12:53 | | Kretschmar (026335) | +| 13-96 10 | | -mail chain — from Scott Rothstein to Michael | +| 1:0 | m. Legamaro (Le | troeroduction) | +| 13-97 10/23/ | E-mail chain -J. | to | +| 1:26 p.m. | Adler, Scott Rothstein and Mark Fistos (26.1 | | +| 13-98 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Matthew Weissing to | | +| 1:31 p.m. | | Adler, Mark Fistos and Steven | +| 13-99 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from | Kretschmar to Scott | +| 1:54 p.m. | Rothstein (27051-27052) | | +| 13-100 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to | | +| 1:59 p.m. | | and Adler (08121-08123) | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 13-101 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Scott Rothstein to | +| | 2:02 p.m. | Steven Jaffe and Mark Fistos (26749- | +| 13-102 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to | +| | 2:05 p.m. | and Adler 08128-011 | +| 13-103 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Adler to | +| | 2:06 .m. | and Mark Fistos 08118-08120 | +| 13-104 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to | +| | 2:09 ..m. | and Adler 08131-08133 | +| 13-105 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Steven Jaffe to | +| | 2:09 p.m. | Mark Fistos and Adler (08124- | +| 13-106 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Matthew Weissing to | +| | 2:10 p.m. | Mark Fistos and Adler (081 | +| 13-107 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Mark Fistos to Ste | +| | 2:24 p.m. | Scott Rothstein, Adler, Bradlefc | +| 13-108 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from Mark Fist to even Jaffe | +| | 2:45 p.m. | Scott Rothstein, Ad , B | +| 13-109 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — from S oths ein to Michael | +| | 3:02 p.m. | Legamaro (27025) | +| 13-110 | 10/23/09 | E-mail chain — s Adler to Scott | +| | 3:43 p.m. | Rothstein (25 7) | +| 13-111 | 10/25/09 | E-mail chain en Jenne to Scott Rothstein | +| | 3:21 p.m. | (25937) | +| 13-112 | 10/27/09 | E-mail c m Preve to A.J. Discala | +| | 2:59 p.m. | ( 73) | +| 13-113 | 10/27/09 | t- 1 chain — from Ken Jenne to Phaedra Xanthos | +| | 5:23 p. | -26605) | +| 13-114 | 10/2 | ail chain — from Ken Jenne to Lea Kaplan | +| | 9: | 6737) | +| 13-115 | 10 | 09 E-mail chain — from Ken Jenne to Mike Fisten and | +| | 9:34 a. i . | Pat 26485 | +| 13-116 | 10/29/09 | E-mail chain — from Paul Cassell to | +| | 7:44 p.m. | (07019-07021) | +| 13-117 | 10/30/09 | E-mail chain — from Scott Rothstein to Debra | +| | 10:04 a.m. | (27013) | +| 13-118 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | +| 13-119 | 3/18/10 | E-mail chain - from C.J. to Tom Hartog | +| | 1:20 a.m. | and Donnie | +| 13-120 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection Marked | +|--------|----------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 13-121 | 3/24/10 | | | +| 13-122 | 4/1/10 | | | +| | | E-mail chain - from C.J. to Story Cowles | | +| 13-123 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | +| 14 | Misc. | All documents filed in the court file, including | | +| 15 | Misc. | All hearing transcripts | Allulffilc | + +### State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein 15i° Judicial Circuit (:)'' + +| 16 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. | | +|-----|---------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 17 | Misc. | All other testimony, transcripts and statemen | | +| | | provided in the matter | ff | +| 17A | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, intervi | o | +| 17B | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, ' e to | E.W. | +| 17C | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, in(eCv | of Jane Doe | + +# LM (cry . J Epstein 15th Judicial Circuit "I: o 0-2008-CA-02805IXXXXMB + +| 18-1 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein] | | | | +|-------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 18-2 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Lawrence Visoski and Davit Hart Rogers | | | | +| 18-3 | 8/12/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – Greens Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-4 | 8/14/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – [REDACTED] Pharmacy | | | | +| 18-5 | 8/20/09 | Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production From Non-Parties and Incorporated Motion for Protective Order | | | | +| 18-6 | 1/23/09 | L.M.'s Answers to Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-7 | 8/4/09 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-8 | 8/29/09 | Notice of Serving Plaintiff's Supplemental Better Answers to Defendant's Interrogatory Number 19 | | | | +| 18-9 | 3/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's Third Interrogatories | | | | +| 18-10 | 4/1/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers to Defendant's Fourth Interrogatories | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 18-11 | 4/15/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Unverified Answers | +| 18-12 | 6/25/10 | Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Update Answers to | +| 18-13 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'s Myspace page | +| 19 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | +| 20 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 21 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 22 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 23 | 8/19/09 | | +| | | 0 ‘ | +| 24 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and SubpoenastAty | +| 25 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to [ore | +| 26 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second ,I omplaint | +| 27 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended | +| 28 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal th 'udice | +| 29 | Misc. | All testimony, deposi pts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes includi _.0 united to: | +| 29A-1 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Tes ' o L.M. | +| 29A-2 | 2/9/10 | Deposition T timo f L.M. | + +### LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein 'Pi - IC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 30 | Misc. | rt doc t [all court filings referenced therein | +|----|---------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 31 | 7/24/09 | m aint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. 1) | +| 32 | 7/20 | S pulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | +| 33 | | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | +| 34 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +### E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 15111 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058/OOOCMB + +| 35 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | +|------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 35-1 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 35-2 | Misc. | Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum to | +| 36 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | +| 37 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 38 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | +| 39 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 40 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate | +| | | Ai r | +| 41 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| 42 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended i t | +| 43 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Lan | +| 44 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complai | +| 45 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With P • dit | +| 46 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation an is ing Case | +| 47 | Misc. | All testimony, depositio ts, exhibits and | +| | | videotapes including, , l• ited to: | +| 47A | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transc ' o | + +### Jar oe v. Jeffrey Epstein US . . Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 48 | Misc. | Court d t [all court filings referenced therein | +|------|---------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | | and all di ry and discovery responses] | +| 48-1 | 4/9/09 | P rntiffs otion to Strike References to Non | +| 48-2 | 1/2 | Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First | +| 49 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | +| 50 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or | +| 51 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 52 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 53 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 54 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | +| 55 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, [REDACTED], Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 56 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 57 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 58A | 9/30/09 | Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 59 | Misc. | Court docket [and all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 60 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 61 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 62 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 63 | 10/30/09 | PlaintiffJane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide | | +| 64 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | Alla | +| 65 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and | | +| | | | „S e 7 | + +### Jane Doe v. United States of America (C USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736- ) + +| 66 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +|----|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 67 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and a enfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein 17111 Judicial Circuit Broward C n Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE + +| 68 | Misc. | Court docket (all co | referenced therein | +|----|---------|----------------------|-----------------------------| +| | | and all discovery | i v responses] | +| 69 | 11/3/09 | Amended Com | | +| 70 | Misc. | All testimony epo r | n transcripts, exhibits and | + +### re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. SBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR + +| 71 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +|-------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 72 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 73 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 74 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes | | | | +| 74A-1 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 74A-2 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 74A-3 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 74B | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| 74C | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 75 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 76 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | +| 77 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| The Florida Bar Matters | | | | | | +| 78 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against [REDACTED] J. Edwards, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 79 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 80 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James Edwards ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 81 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 82 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 83 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 84 | Misc. | Court docket [all court filings referenced therein and all discovery and discovery responses] | | | | +| 85 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 86 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 87 | Misc. | All testimony, deposition transcripts, exhibits and videotapes including, but not limited to: | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 87A-1 | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 87A-2 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-3 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 87A-4 | 12/14/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-5 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-6 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 87A-7 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-8 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Second Session | | | | +| 87A-9 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-10 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – P.M. Session | | | | +| 87A-11 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-12 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 87A-13 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-14 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 87A-15 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 87A-16 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | + +### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler — Communication + +| 88 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | +|----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 89 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01620) | | | +| 90 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01446) | | | +| 91 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], [REDACTED] Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 92 | 5/19/09 | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to J. | +| | 12:00 p.m. | (05725) | +| 93 | 5/19/09 | E-mail chain - from to Russel | +| | 12:03 p.m. | Adler (01574 | +| 94 | 5/22/09 | E-mail chain - from I=I J. to Susan | +| | 12:13 p.m. | Spencer Wendel (01449) | +| 95 | 5/22/09 | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to | +| | 12:21 p.m. | J. 05148 | +| 96 | 5/26/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to Timothy | +| | 4:57 p.m. | Malloy (01450) | +| 97 | 5/26/09 | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to J. | +| | 5:33 p.m. | (05151) | +| 98 | 5/28/09 | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to | +| | 2:13 p.m. | J. 05161 | +| 99 | 5/28/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to | +| | 2:16 p.m. | J. Berger (02241-02242) | +| 100 | 6/3/09 | E-mail chain - from William J Berge | +| | 5:17 p.m. | cc Adler and Bra ands | +| 101 | 6/4/09 | E-mail chain - from Bradle s to Susan | +| | 10:43 a.m. | K. Stirling, cc Marti 4 0) | +| 102 | 6/9/09 | E-mail chain - from B I dwards to Eric | +| | 3:10 p.m. | Glasser (06655) | +| 103 | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - y I to Michele | +| | 12:52 p.m. | Dargan (Palm each tly News) | +| 104 | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - radley J. to Paul | +| | 1:03 p.m. | Cassell 634) | +| 105 | 6/23/09 | E-mail c m Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1:13 p.m. | ds 239) | +| 106 | 6/23/09 | 'l chain - from to Michele | +| | 1:16 p. | (05203) | +| 107 | 6/23 | ail chain - from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 1 | wards (05277-0521. | +| 108 | 6/2 | E-mail chain - from J. to Michele | +| | 2:31 p. . | Dargan (05207-05208) | +| 109 | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 2:41 p.m. | 05324-05325 | +| 110 | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to Michele | +| | 2:53 p.m. | Dargan (05212-05213) | +| III | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to J. | +| | 3:08 p.m. | 05344-05346 | +| 112 | 6/23/09 | E-mail chain - from J. to Michele | +| | 3:12 p.m. | Dargan (05215-05217) | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 113 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 114 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 115 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05387-05388) | | | | +| 116 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 117 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 118 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 119 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 120 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 121 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 122 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | | | | +| 123 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 124 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 125 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05803) | | | | +| 126 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 127 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 128 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 129 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 130 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 131 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 132 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 133 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | +| 134 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11075-11076) | | | | +| 135 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | | | | +| 136 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 137 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 138 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 139 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | +| 140 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 141 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 142 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 143 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 144 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 145 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06959-06960) | | | | +| 146 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06975) | | | | +| 147 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 148 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 149 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 150 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 151 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 152 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 153 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 154 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 155 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 156 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 157 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07612-07613) | | | | +| 158 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (02595-02596) | | | | +| 159 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07614-07615) | | | | +| 160 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (07605-07606) | | | | +| 161 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (07607-07608) | | | | +| 162 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (07609-07611) | | | | +| 163 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (04015) | | | | +| 164 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07646) | | | | +| 165 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff (07647) | | | | +| 166 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07676-07677) | | | | +| 167 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07674-07675) | | | | +| 168 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED] (07678-07679) | | | | +| 169 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07684-07685) | | | | +| 170 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07682-07683) | | | | +| 171 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07695-07697) | | | | +| 172 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07680-07681) | | | | +| 173 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07686-07688) | | | | +| 174 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07689-07691) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 175 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 176 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 177 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318) | | | | +| 178 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 179 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 180 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 181 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 182 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 183 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 184 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
[REDACTED] (04321) | | | | +| 185 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 186 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 187 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Renee/Carlos [REDACTED] (02913) | | | | +| 188 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
Conchita Sarnoff (06789) | | | | +| 189 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards (06788) | | | | +| 190 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita
Sarnoff (19986-19987) | | | | +| 191 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 192 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 193 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 194 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 195 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 196 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 197 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 198 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 199 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 200 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 201 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 202 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 203 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 204 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Bradley J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie Johnson (01099) | | | | +| 205 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie Johnson (01741) | | | | +| 206 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 207 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 208 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 209 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 210 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | | | | +| 211 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 212 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 213 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 214 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 215 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 216 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 217 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 218 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in Edwards adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 219 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to Bradley J. Edwards (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 220 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 221 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 222 | 11/9/17 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 223 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 224 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 225 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 226 | Misc. | Subpoenas and Notices of Deposition for Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield and Leonard Baird | | | | +| 227 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr. ( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 228 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| J. [REDACTED] | | | | | | +| 229 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 230 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 231 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 232 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 233 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad [REDACTED]
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 234 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for Bradley J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 235 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 236 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. Edwards | | | | +| 237 | | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 238 | 5/7/12 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 239 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 240 | 1/16/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout
( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 241 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout
( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 242 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 243 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 244 | 5/14/13 | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 245 | | ██████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad ██████ with referenced articles | | | | +| 245A | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| 245B | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| 245C | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| 245D | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| 245E | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245F | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| 245G | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| 245H | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| 245I | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| 245J | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 245K | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana | +| 245L | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of | +| 245M | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower | +| 245N | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| 245O | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| 245P | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| 245Q | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| 245R | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Rut ul once | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Chan t Palm | +| 245S | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily New ew Lawsuit Against | +| | | Epstein Expected to tim Testimony | +| 245T | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami Excl • iv • al Assault Victim | +| | | Alleges Abuse Youth Pastor | +| 245U | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. leva Fall Nets Woman \$13 | +| 245V | July 2012 | Daily B Review. Top Florida Verdicts & | +| | | Set emen o 2011 | +| 245W | 6/13/12 | P Bus ess Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush | +| | | is ub of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | +| 245X | 4/22/ 1 | iik m Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey | +| | | • s Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney | +| 246 | 8/10 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with | +| 246A | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected | +| 246B | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on | +| 246C | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire | +| | | Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 246D | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| 246E | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| 246F | 4/23/14 | Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| 246G | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| 247 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; James
[REDACTED] ; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXA- [REDACTED] | | | | +| 248 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; James
[REDACTED] ; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX- [REDACTED] | | | | +| 249 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion - Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 250 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 251 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 252 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 253 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Answer and Affirmative Defenses ; [REDACTED] National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 254 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 255 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 256 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 257 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 258 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 259 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 260 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 261 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 262 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 263 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 264 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Ist United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 265 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 266 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. Bradley J. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 267 | Misc. | Docket and all court filings referenced therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 268 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 269 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 270 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 271 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 272 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 273 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 274 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 275 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 276 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 277 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad Edwards and Associates | | | | +| 278 | | Florida Bar Rules including, but not limited to, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 279 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 280 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 281 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 282 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Experts | | | | | | +| 283 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | + +| No. 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 | Date Misc. 9/9/16 11/30/16 Misc. 11/1/09 11/2/09 11/2/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/3/09 11/5/09 11/6/09 | Description Objection Marked Marked in for Id. Evidence his 10/20/17 Report Ex Bernard J. Jansen in v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) 4OAA All public recur Ci Other Articles Rothstein yy Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme ie ge: "and is Going into Receivership The New York Times: Fr adorn Against Florida Lawyer Set 0 ace t Return His Donations Rothstein Retu ntemplating Suicide, Partner Says Florida Law i ks to be Dissolved Sun Sen Seemed d to be True F s N i ' g Funds Probe dik w 1irri | +|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 297 | 1 | othstein Accomplice Still on Lam | +| 298 | 11 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | +| 299 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | +| 300 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | +| 301 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | +| 302 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 303 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give | +| 304 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | +| 305 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part II | +| 306 | 11/18/09 | Former RAA Attorneys Take New Jobs | +| 307 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et at | +| 308 | 11/20/09 | Article b Paul Brinkman | +| 309 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder 1014111\$ Ugly Past | +| 310 | 11/22/09 | Levin was Rothstein's Whale | +| 311 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from | +| 312 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with | +| 313 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in To | +| 314 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein P | +| 315 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | +| 316 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Lo Former | +| 317 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former of t Attorneys | +| 318 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Bus' al. A Year After | +| | | Rothstein. Man do Unanswered | +| 319 | 10/31/10 | The Florida B . Sc othstein Scandal: One | +| 320 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. tern Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| | | Corrupti 'nd Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | +| 321 | 10/13/14 | F' e Year on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 322 | 10/3/17 | a each Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| 323 | | All public records and news articles relating to | +| | | J. and any witnesses listed by | +| 323A-1 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| 323A-2 | Misc. | E.W.'s mugshot arrest information | +| 323A-3 | 3/17/11 | E.W.'s marriage license | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-4 | Misc. | Brent Moody's mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-5 | Misc. | Gregory [REDACTED] mugshot arrest information | | | | +| 323A-6 | Misc. | Property Records for 4140 N.W. 7th Lane, Delray Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323A-7 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Moody, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-8 | N/D | Florida Corporations Division's Records for C. Moody Enterprises, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-9 | N/D | Florida Corporation Division's Records for Courtney Elizabeth, Inc. | | | | +| 323A-10a | Misc. | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832; Court Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-10b | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Information | | | | +| 323A-10c | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Case File Sheet | | | | +| 323A-10d | 2/19/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Notice of Appearance, Waiver of Arraignment, Plea of Not Guilty, Demand for Discovery and Demand for Trial | | | | +| 323A-10e | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Judgment and Sentencing | | | | +| 323A-10f | 1/10/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Complaint/Arrest Affidavit | | | | +| 323A-11 | 1/14/18 | 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for Eva [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323A-12 | 1/16/18 | 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-13 | 1/16/18 | 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Search Results for E.W. | | | | +| 323A-14a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Docket and court documents | | | | +| 323A-14b | 8/4/96 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-1996-GA-00487 - Order Approving Settlement of Minor's Tort Claim | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-15a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-15b | 11/12/02 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Citations | | | | +| 323A-15c | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | +| 323A-15d | 10/21/03 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-15e | 1/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15f | 4/7/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Amended Affidavit – Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-15g | 5/22/04 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-15h | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Order for Restitution | | | | +| 323A-15i | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-15j | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Fines, Costs and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323A-15k | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Sheriff Information Sheet | | | | +| 323A-15l | 6/17/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2002-CG-026985-AXXX-MB - Final Judgment for Cost of Supervision Fee | | | | +| 323A-16a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-16b | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-16c | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report - Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-16d | 12/6/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report | | | | +| 323A-16e | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List of Criminal Activity | | | | +| 323A-16f | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Order | | | | +| 323A-16g | 12/7/06 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-16h | 1/4/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-CF-16146-AXXX-MB - No File for Aggravated Battery | | | | +| 323A-17a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-17b | 7/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-CF-008710-AXXX-MB - No File for Possession of Scheduled IV Substance | | | | +| 323A-18a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-18b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear - Possession of a Controlled Substance | | | | +| 323A-18c | 6/15/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 07-603178 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-18d | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-18e | 7/9/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Information | | | | +| 323A-18f | 7/11/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity Report | | | | +| 323A-18g | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-18h | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323A-18i | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement | | | | +| 323A-18j | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323A-18k | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323A-18l | 8/6/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | +| 323A-18m | 5/25/08 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-013914-AXXX-MB - Notice to Suspend Driving Privileges | | | | +| 323A-19a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB – Docket and Court Filings | | | | +| 323A-19b | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Boynton Beach Police Department - Battery | | | | +| 323A-19c | 10/18/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Information - Battery | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-19d | 10/29/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-MM-021940-AXXX-SB - Cross Reference List – Criminal Defendant Activity | | | | +| 323A-20a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-20b | 6/15/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-163488-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-21a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-21b | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 50-2007-TR-166340-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-22a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-22b | 8/8/07 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-204547-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-23a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-23b | 5/30/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-23c | 6/23/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-010876-AXXX-MB - Collection Agreement and Judgment | | | | +| 323A-24a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-24b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Arrest / Notice to Appear – North Palm Beach Public Safety Report No. 70-09009903 | | | | +| 323A-24c | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CF-011288-AXXX-MB - Notice of Arraignment | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-25a | | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Docket | | | | +| 323A-25b | 9/17/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-25c | 10/30/09 | Andrew Pastor, Esq. v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CC-014838 - Final Judgment for Possession | | | | +| 323A-26a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-26b | 10/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-MM-018257 – First Appearance Disposition Record – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-26c | 10/9/09 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-27a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-27b | 6/9/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-144682-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-28a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-28b | 9/5/09 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-TR-233639-AXXX-NB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-29a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-29b | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Report No. 78-10001780 and Probable Cause Affidavit – Possession of Marijuana | | | | +| 323A-29c | 9/16/10 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CF-003921-AXXX-MB Judgment, Sentence and Plea | | | | +| 323A-30a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-30b | 4/4/10 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-010505-AXXX-NB – Citations | | | | +| 323A-31a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-31b | 7/17/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323A-31c | 8/19/11 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-029906-AXXX-MB – Plea, Judgment | | | | +| 323A-32a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-227746-AXXX-MB - Docket | | | | +| 323A-32b | 9/15/10 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-227746-AXXX-MB - Citation | | | | +| 323A-33 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-TR-227747-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-34a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-014746-AXXX-SB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-34b | 5/20/11 | Arrest / Notice to Appear – Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-11-076192 | | | | +| 323A-34c | 5/20/11 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-34d | 8/19/11 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT-014746-AXXX-SB - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323A-35a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-35b | 1/5/12 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-35c | 4/20/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB - Plea | | | | +| 323A-35d | 7/30/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2012031810 | | | | +| 323A-35e | 8/1/12 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CT-000557-AXXX-MB - Judgment | | | | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E. W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 36a | Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135- | +| 323A- | 5/10/12 Arrest / Notice to Appear Report No. 82-2012- | +| 36b | 10813 and Probable Cause Affidavit | +| 323A- | 8/6/12 State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 36c | Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135- | +| 323A- | 8/6/12 State of Florida v. E. W, 15t° Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 36d | Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-005135- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm 0 | +| 37a | Beach County Case No. 50-2012-CF-007118- | +| 323A- | 5/13/12 Arrest /Notice to Appear Report No. 40-1 - | +| 37b | 006170 and Probable Cause Affidavit | +| 323A- | 7/14/12 State of Florida v. E.W, 15th Judicial lm | +| 37c | Beach County Case No. 50-2012- | +| 323A-38 | Eva v. E.W., 15th Judi& ' Palm Beach | +| | County Case No. 50-2013- 614000C-MB | +| | — Docket and Court D ents | +| 323A-39 | Eva J. v. Bre a oody, 15th Judicial | +| | Circuit, Palm B Case No. 50-2013- | +| | DR-004658- — Docket and Court | +| 323A-40 | State of orida v. E.W., 17th Judicial Circuit, | +| | Broward Case No. | +| | 6 OTR 209A88830 — Docket and Court | +| 323A-41 | a County Court docket search results — E.W. | +| 323A- | to of Florida v. E. W, 6th Judicial Circuit, | +| 42a | nellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 — | +| 323A- | 6/21/ Citation | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 61° Judicial Circuit, | +| 43a | Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943- | +| 323A- | 6/21/13 Citation | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-44 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062943WPW – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-45 | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013TR062559 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-46b | 8/20/13 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Sheriff's Office Subject Charge Report | | | | +| 323A-46c | 7/19/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-46d | 6/23/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | +| 323A-46e | 6/22/13 | Complaint/Arrest Affidavit PP13-36627 | | | | +| 323A-46f | 5/30/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Judgment of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation | | | | +| 323A-46g | 9/17/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Affidavit Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-46h | 9/15/14 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Probation Specialist Report on Violation | | | | +| 323A-46i | 8/12/15 | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 - Plea/Disposition on Violation of Probation | | | | +| 323A-47a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA021127XXXXNO – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-47b | 12/25/13 | Complaint / Arrest Affidavit Report No. 2013-77625 | | | | +| 323A-48a | | State of Florida v. E.W. , 6 th Judicial Circuit Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CA-128504 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-48b | 10/24/13 | Citation | | | | +| 323A-48c | 12/24/13 | Officer's Worksheet | | | | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 6111Judicial Circuit, | +| 49a | Pinellas County Case No. 52-2013-CT062524 — | +| 323A- | 1/17/14 Subject Charge Report | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E. W., Pinellas County Circuit | +| 50a | Court Case No. 16-02415-OC-CF — Docket and | +| 323A- | 5/6/16 Subject Charge Report | +| 323A-51 | State of Florida v. E.W, Pinellas County Circuit | +| 323A-52 | Hillsborough County search result — E.W. | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circ u | +| 53a | Hillsborough County Case No. 2014- -0 | +| 323A- | 10/19/14 Criminal Report Affidavit / Notic o 14- | +| 53b | 16018 | +| 323A- | 6/18/14 State of Florida v. E.W., 13th di ircuit Court, | +| 53c | Hillsborough County Case 01 MM-012614 - | +| 323A-54 | State of Florida v. • . .* udicial Circuit Court, | +| | Hillsborough Co o. 2014-MM | +| | 015507000A — D et and Court Documents | +| 323A- | State of Flori W, 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 55a | Hillsbor County Case No. 2014-MM | +| | 0160180 cket and Court Documents | +| 323A- | 10/19/14 C • inal port Affidavit / Notice to Appear 14- | +| 323A- | 9/19/14 e f Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 55c | lsborough County Case No. 2014-MM | +| 323A- | Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W., 131° Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 56a | Hillsborough County Case No. 2014- | +| 323A- | 11/20/14 Arocket 1, LLC v. E.W., 131° Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 56b | Hillsborough County Case No. 2014- | +| 323A- | State of Florida v. E. W, 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 57a | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015TR009235000 | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|---------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| 323A- | 1/11/16 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 58a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | Judgment, Clerk's Certificate, Order of Revocation | +| 58b | | of Probation and Sentence | +| 323A- | 2/25/16 | State of Florida v. E. W, 13'h Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-16193000 | +| 323A- | 4/4/16 | Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| 59b | | Report No. 16-190881 | +| 323A- | 11/20/15 | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 59c | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-161 | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E.W, 13th Judicial C. ut | +| 60a | | Hillsborough County Case No. 2015 00 | +| 323A- | 1/11/15 | Citation | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E. W., it ici 1 Circuit Court, | +| 61a | | Hillsborough County No. 16-CF | +| | | 004732000AHC — Court Documents | +| 323A- | 12/5/16 | State of Florida . Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 61b | | Hillsborough ot" e No. 2016-CF | +| | | 004732000A I IC — ea, Sentencing, Judgment | +| 323A- | | State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 62a | | HillsborougThrounty Case No. 2016-CF | +| | | 0 33000AHC — Docket and Court Documents | +| 323A- | 4/4/16 | C nal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear — 16- | +| 62b | | 3 | +| 323A-63 | 7/2 | m Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-64 | 7/2 | 7 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-65 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-66 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Re' id Case No. 07-603911 | +| 323A-67 | 7/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323A-68 | 9/18/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Re . e rt Case No. 07-604930 | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-69 | 9/7/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-604687 | | | | +| 323A-70 | | Eva Jeanne v. E.W. , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2012-DR-009334-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-71 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Incident Report #2040097 | | | | +| 323A-72a | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-067231 | | | | +| 323A-72b | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-067249 | | | | +| 323A-72c | | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-72d | 5/20/03 | Eva v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 03-1633-DVFC-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323A-73a | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-091886 | | | | +| 323A-73b | | State of Florida v. Eva Ford , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2003-CF-008412-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-74 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-096606 | | | | +| 323A-75 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-19767 | | | | +| 323A-76 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 | | | | +| 323A-77 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Case No. 03-21604 | | | | +| 323A-78 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 | | | | +| 323A-78a | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Information Sheet Case No. 0420500 | | | | +| 323A-78b | 5/22/04 | Lake Worth Police Department Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report Agency Report No. 62-01-1-20500 | | | | +| 323A-79 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-084433 | | | | +| 323A-80 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-049448 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323A-81 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-06073437 | | | | +| 323A-82 | 6/9/07 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report #7028375 | | | | +| 323A-83 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 | | | | +| 323A-84a | | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-84b | 11/12/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Complaint for Tenant Eviction | | | | +| 323A-84c | 11/27/02 | Ray Flow v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-027593-EVRF-MB – Final Judgment for Eviction | | | | +| 323A-85 | | The David Associates I v. Eva [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2002-CC-011051-EVRF-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-86a | 6/6/90 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 90-509-CA-01 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323A-86b | 3/13/08 | Eva [REDACTED] v. Wesley W. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 95-7369 – Motion | | | | +| 323A-87 | | State of Florida v. Wesley William [REDACTED], Jr., 5 th Judicial Circuit, Hernando County, Case No. 90001037CFMA – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323A-88 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search | | | | +| 323A-88a | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed between Homes By West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 323A-88-b | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed between E.W. and Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 323A-89a | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Property Search – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-89b | 2/24/15 | Closing Documents – E.W. | | | | +| 323A-90 | 5/30/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-085397 | | | | +| 323A-91 | 5/20/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 11-076192 with Supplements 1 & 2 | | | | +| 323B-1 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Earth Bubbles LLC and Corporate Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 323B-2 | | Florida Corporation Printout for Loxayoga LLC | +| 323B-3 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323B-4 | 10/14/17 | Palm Beach County Sherriffs Office Offense | +| 323B-5 | License Details -L.M. | | +| 323B-6 | License Details — L.M. | | +| 323B-7 | Twitter Account — L.M. | Awk. | +| 323B-8 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Wayne Seaman AS | +| 323B-9 | | Booking / Arrest Information — John Reidel | +| 323B-10 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Justin Sprague | +| 323B-11 | | Booking / Arrest Information — Lexine Tumey | +| 323B-12a | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20'h | Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | 1/8/08 Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th | Judicial Ci | +| | | County Case No. 08-DR-003141 - P ' | +| 323B-12c | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th Ju 'a ' it, Lee | +| | County Case No. 08-DR-0 | 1 - form Child | +| | Custody Jurisdiction and | fo ent Act | +| | 1/30/08 Justin Sprague v. L. | Ju icial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case No. 0 - i R | 41 - Respondent's | +| 323B-12e | 2/26/08 Justin Spragu v. L. | 0th Judicial Circuit, Lee | +| | County Case | DR-003141— Order on | +| | Motion | ransfer Venue — 50-2008-DR 003645 | +| 323B-13 | Sharon R | c Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach | +| | ty S | h Results — L.M. | +| | L | , to of DOR OBO v. Justin L. Sprague, 15th | +| | L. is . I | Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50- | +| 323B-16 | 1 | .M. v. Justin L. Sprague, 15'h Judicial Circuit, | +| 3238-17 | State of Florida v. L.M., 151h | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-18 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-19 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-033050 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-20 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-045627 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-21 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-003304 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-22 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. John T. Reidel , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-DR-004824 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-23 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097995 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-24 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-097991 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-25 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2007-TR-261718 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-26 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-CT-001998 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-27 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067444 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-28 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-067445 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-29 | | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2008-DR-003645 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-30 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-195830 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-31 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338340 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-32 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2008-TR-338339 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 323B-33 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-34 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-35 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-36a | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | 9/29/10 State of Florida v. L.M. 15th | Circuit Court, Palm | +| 323B-36c | 10/11/10 Arrest /Notice to Appear and Probabl | | +| 323B-37 | State of Florida v. LM, 15th | Judi ' rc Palm | +| | Beach County Case No. 50-2 | 3416 — | +| 323B-38 | State of Florida v. L.M., | J ' ial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach County Case N | -TR-173415 — | +| | Docket and Court | o | +| 323B-39 | State of Florid | th Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | Beach Coun | ase 50-2011-TR-173563 — | +| | Docket and Co | cuments | +| 323B-40 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-41a | to Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-42 | State of Florida v. L.M., 15th | Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323B-43a | State of Florida v. L.M., 151° Judicial Circuit, Palm | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-43b | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 13-00742 | | | | +| 323B-44 | | Justin Lee Sprague v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No 50-2013-DR-001053 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-45 | | Maynor & Associates LLC FKA Maynor Sachs & Copple LLC v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-SC-010273 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-46 | | State of Florida v. L.M. v. Wayne A. Seaman , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-14-DR-011327 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-47 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140544 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-48 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-TR-140545 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49a | | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-49b | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 323B-50 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-TR-007216 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-51 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045479 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-52 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-TR-045493 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-53 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2017-DR-012051 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-54 | | State of Florida v. L.M. , Broward County Clerk of Court Case No. 08102448TI20A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-55 | 8/6/95 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Christine [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-56 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Anna C. Terry | | | | +| 323B-57 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Robbie N. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 323B-58 | 7/4/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-59a | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage with Dependent or Minor Child(ren) | | | | +| 323B-59b | 6/10/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) Affidavit | | | | +| 323B-59c | 10/26/99 | Christine Clarrissa [REDACTED] v. Scott Allan Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. CD99 4791 – Order to Effect Service of Process on Respondent or Judgment of Dismissal Without Prejudice | | | | +| 323B-60 | 5/23/01 | Christine C. [REDACTED] v. Scott A. Miller , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Petition for Regular Dissolution of Marriage (with children) | | | | +| 323B-60a | 12/1/14 | Christine C. Miller v. Scott A. [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2001 DR 4621 – Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323B-61 | | Anna Terry v. Scott [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 2004 DR 001691 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62a | 7/6/04 | In re LM , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323B-62b | 7/6/04 | In re L.M. , Petition for Involuntary Treatment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323B-62c | 7/15/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Information / Description Sheet | | | | +| 323B-62d | 7/20/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Order of Dismissal and Closing Mental Health File | | | | +| 323B62-e | 7/14/04 | In re L.M. , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50 2004 MH 001376 – Letter from Scott [REDACTED] to Commissioner Hanson | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323-B63 | 5/19/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98-079452 | | | | +| 323B-64 | 1/1/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99015315 | | | | +| 323B-65 | 3/28/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99052321 | | | | +| 323B-66 | 4/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99065180 | | | | +| 323B-67 | 4/29/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-68 | 1/1/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-69 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-70 | 8/23/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-71 | 1/9/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-72 | 2/8/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-73 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-74 | 4/29/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-75 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-76 | 7/12/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-77 | 11/23/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-78 | 3/10/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-79 | 3/11/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-80 | 4/2/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323B-81 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-82 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-83 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-84 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-85 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-86 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-87 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-88 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-89 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-90 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-91 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-92 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-93 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-94 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-95 | | DemonsCycle Photo | | | | +| 323B-96 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 323B-97 | 9/12/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-121047 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323B-98 | 3/10/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-047084 | | | | +| 323B-99 | 6/2/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-081178 | | | | +| 323B-100 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 323B-101 | 3/31/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-056185 | | | | +| 323B-102 | 6/2/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-080955 | | | | +| 323B-103 | 8/19/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-110038 | | | | +| 323B-104 | 11/15/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-143988 | | | | +| 323B-105 | 12/1/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-149652 | | | | +| 323B-106 | 12/4/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-150902 | | | | +| 323B-107 | 3/4/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-047135 | | | | +| 323B-108 | 12/31/17 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 17-169751 | | | | +| 323B-109 | 8/7/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-106910 | | | | +| 323B-110 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 323B-111 | 1/4/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-022380 | | | | +| 323B-112 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 323B-113 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 323B-114 | 12/4/16 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 16-160017 | | | | +| 323C-1 | | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property Records | | | | +| 323C-2 | | Mugshot/Booking Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-3 | | Mugshot/Booking Information - Jamie Capalbo | | | | +| 323C-4 | 11/8/10 | Mugshot/Booking Information – Batu Tonaroglu | | | | +| 323C-5 | 6/26/00 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offence Report Case No. 00094263 | | | | +| 323C-6 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-7 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-8 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-9 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-10 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-11 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-12 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-13 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-14 | 9/29/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-15 | 12/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-16 | 1/6/04 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report – Case No. 04-000491 | | | | +| 323C-17 | 10/7/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04120214 | | | | +| 323C-18 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 04140335 | | | | +| 323C-19 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-20 | 5/11/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 6065267 | | | | +| 323C-21 | 2/6/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report | | | | +| 323C-22 | 6/2/09 | State of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Driver Licenses Transcript Record – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-23 | | Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Criminal History Information – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-24 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , Broward County Circuit Court Case No. 11020221CF10A – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-25 | | Palm Beach County Clerk of Court Search Results – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-26 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2002-IN-024424-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-27 | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-IN-005174 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-28b | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report – Case No. 05035619 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-28c | 5/23/05 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 - Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-28d | 5/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2005-CT-006666 Final Judgment for Fines, Costs, and Additional Charges | | | | +| 323C-29a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-29b | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2006065038 | | | | +| 323C-29c | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report and Probable Cause Affidavit - Report No. 06-15-0364 | | | | +| 323C-29d | 12/26/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 06150364 | | | | +| 323C-29e | 12/27/06 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-29f | 1/25/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Capias | | | | +| 323C-29g | 10/6/12 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 - Clerk of Circuit Court – Case Bond Depositor Request Form and Assignment Form | | | | +| 323C-29h | 12/21/11 | Florida Driver License – Douglas Evan Schlien | | | | +| 323C-29i | 5/2/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No. 2007024243 | | | | +| 323C-29j | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Order Assessing Additional Charges, Costs and Fines and Entering Judgment | | | | +| 323C-29k | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Plea in the County Court | | | | +| 323C-29l | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Application for Criminal Indigent Status | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-29m | 5/22/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2006-MM-029242 – Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Palm Beach County Case No. 2007-MM-008444-AXXX-MB – Docket and Court Docs. | | | | +| 323C-30b | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07067112 | | | | +| 323C-30c | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card Book #2007023554 | | | | +| 323C-30d | 4/30/07 | Clerk of the Circuit Court Cross Reference List County Criminal Defendant Activity Report – Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-30e | 4/28/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report - Report No. 06-07-067112 | | | | +| 323C-30f | 9/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Notice of Appearance by William Berger | | | | +| 323C-30g | 5/18/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 - Judgment | | | | +| 323C-30h | 6/1/07 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 502007MM008444 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-31a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-31b | 10/28/09 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-025833 – Notice of Appearance by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler – Jonathan Birkman | | | | +| 323C-32a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2009-CT-009222 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-32b | 3/23/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citation #4202-RSK 5 | | | | +| 323C-33a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-33b | 9/12/10 | Delray Beach Police Department - Arrest/Notice to Appear Report No. FLO 500400 | | | | +| 323C-33c | 9/12/10 | Florida Uniform Traffic Citations | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-33d | 10/7/10 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Capias | | | | +| 323C-33e | 2/7/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-027408 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-34a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 - Docket and Court Docs | | | | +| 323C-34b | 9/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-34c | 2/9/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-028350 – Judgment and Fingerprints | | | | +| 323C-35a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-0158219 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-35b | 9/12/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010045488 | | | | +| 323C-35c | 11/15/10 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card No 2010056669 | | | | +| 323C-36a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-035811 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-36b | 11/15/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-37a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-CT-037864 –Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-37b | 12/8/10 | Traffic Citation | | | | +| 323C-38a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010-MM-021516 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-38b | 12/9/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-39a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037753 – Docket and Case Documents | | | | +| 323C-39a | 12/11/10 | Traffic Citations | | | | +| 323C-40a | | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2010- CT-037705 – Docket and Court Documents | | | | + +| No. Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 12/15/10 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office — | | +| 323C-40c 12/15/10 | Citations | | +| 323C-41a | State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th | Judicial Circuit, | +| 12/15/10 | Citations | | +| 1/14/11 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Booking Card | AA' 323C-41c | +| 323C - 42a | State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15t | ' Judicial Circuit | +| 12/15/10 | Citation | | +| 323C-43a | State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th | Judie | +| | Court, Palm Beach County Case No. | 2 R | +| 12/15/10 | Citation | | +| 323C-44a | State of Florida v. Ja | e, 15 Judicial Circuit | +| | Court, Palm Beach | u e No. 50-2011-CT | +| | 003703-AXXX- | et and Court | +| 1/28/11 | Citation | | +| 323C-44c 5/29/12 | State of :).tt i v. Jane Doe, 151h Judicial Circuit | | +| | C. i. Pa Beach County Case No. 50-2011-CT | | +| 323C-45a | ib | | +| | i to | | +| | alorida v. Jane Doe, 156 | Judicial Circuit | +| 2/1/1 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15°1 | Judicial Circuit | +| 323C-45c 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe, 15th | Judicial Circuit | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-45d | 2/2/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – Order of No Contact | | | | +| 323C-45e | 3/14/11 | State of Florida v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 2011-CF-001160-AXXX-MB – No File | | | | +| 323C-46a | | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-46b | 2/16/11 | Jamie Neil Capalbo v. Jane Doe , Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-001907-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, Dismissal of Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323C-47a | | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-47b | 2/22/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Temporary Injunction, | | | | +| 323C-47c | 3/2/11 | Jane Doe v. Jamie N. Capalbo , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2011-DR-002053-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323C-48 | | Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu v. Jane Doe , 15 th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2014-AS-700326-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49a | | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Docket and Court Documents | | | | +| 323C-49b | 11/1/16 | Mine Park v. Jane Doe and Batu Ibrahim Tonaroglu , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2016-DR-011161-XXXX-MB – Petition for Temporary Custody, Order for Relative Custody | | | | +| 323C-50 | 3/20/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8441655 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-51 | 5/10/84 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 8460082 | | | | +| 323C-52 | 4/30/88 | Affidavit of Probable Cause – Possession of Cocaine; [REDACTED] Dial | | | | +| 323C-53 | 5/13/88 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Case No. 88-5449-CF – Information for Possession of Cocaine | | | | +| 323C-54 | 1/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 9114746 | | | | +| 323C-55a | 4/3/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, Fugitive Warrant, Waiver of Extradition, Order and Fugitive Release | | | | +| 323C-55b | 4/1/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 9169712 | | | | +| 323C-56a | 4/25/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-49190F – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-56b | 3/23/91 | West Palm Beach Police Department, Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 94-91-20938 | | | | +| 323C-57 | 7/2/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91123360 | | | | +| 323C-58 | 7/13/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91132390 | | | | +| 323C-59 | 8/15/91 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 91148337 | | | | +| 323C-60a | 6/5/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Allen Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9388CF – Information for false imprisonment and battery | | | | +| 323C-60b | 7/9/91 | Probable Cause Affidavits, Report No. 91-127098 | | | | +| 323C-61a | 8/26/91 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] Dial, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 91-9862-CF – Information for burglary and grand theft | | | | +| 323C-61b | 8/15/91 | Greenacres City Dept. of Public Safety Probable Cause Affidavit Report No. 4-21-1918682 | | | | +| 323C-62a | 4/16/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 – Petition for Dissolution of Marriage; Petition for Child Custody and Other Relief | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-62b | 12/8/97 | Cassandra [REDACTED] v. Bradly Alan Dial and [REDACTED], 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 97-3031 - Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage | | | | +| 323C-63 | 11/23/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 98161878 | | | | +| 323C-64a | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial Arrest Affidavit – First Degree Murder / Aggravated Child Abuse | | | | +| 323C-64b | 7/12/00 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-65a | 5/18/99 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Information; possession of counterfeit bills | | | | +| 323C-65b | 1/21/99 | Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety - Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-65c | 10/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 99-5707-CF-A02 – Sentence and Judgment | | | | +| 323C-65d | 11/7/01 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial v. State of Florida , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D00-4167 - Opinion | | | | +| 323C-66 | 3/10/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-044660 | | | | +| 323C-67 | 8/22/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-112705 | | | | +| 323C-68 | 9/3/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-117506 | | | | +| 323C-69 | 9/27/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-17025 | | | | +| 323C-70 | 10/13/99 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 99-133427 | | | | +| 323C-71a | 7/24/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF – Information for Third Degree Grand Theft | | | | +| 323C-71b | 7/7/00 | Arrest Affidavit Report No. 1430000 and Booking Form | | | | +| 323C-71c | 6/30/00 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial , 19 th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-882-CF - Complaint Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-72 | 1/19/02 | [REDACTED] County Sheriff's Office Jail Commitment & Booking Form and Arrest Affidavit – [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Dial – aggravated manslaughter | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323C-73 | 2/13/04 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-875-CFB – Judgment; Aggravated manslaughter of a child | | | | +| 323C-74 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-75 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammy [REDACTED] Huff, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No., 00-875-CFA – Interview of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-76 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED] Dial, 19th Judicial Circuit, [REDACTED] County Case No. 00-375 – Deposition of Jane Doe | | | | +| 323C-77 | 2/17/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06034056 | | | | +| 323C-78 | 6/2/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06073497 | | | | +| 323C-79 | 10/4/06 | Greenacres Department of Public Safety Offense Report No. 06-15661 and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323C-80 | 10/5/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06119682 | | | | +| 323C-81 | 10/8/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06121014 | | | | +| 323C-82a | 6/26/06 | In re [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB – Petition for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82b | 7/14/06 | Comprehensive Alcoholism Rehabilitation Programs, Inc. Chemical Dependency Assessment Form | | | | +| 323C-82c | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Order for Involuntary Assessment for Substance Abuse | | | | +| 323C-82d | 7/6/06 | In re Cassandra [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 50-2006-MH-01223-XXX-MB - Report on Hearing | | | | +| 323C-83a | 8/2/07 | State of Florida v. [REDACTED], 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 07CF009101AMB – Information for fraudulent use of a credit card | | | | +| 323C-83b | 6/24/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83c | 8/26/07 | Palm Beach Sheriff's Office Booking Card | | | | +| 323C-83d | 6/24/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit | | | | +| 323D-1 | 11/4/97 | [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Offense Report – [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|---------|---------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| +| 323D-2 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | | +| 323D-3 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach Coun | Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323D-4 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach Coun | Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 323D-5 | N/D | In re Daniel | 111,15 ° Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| 323D-6 | 6/10/01 | Palm Beach Police Department Offense | O | +| 323D-7 | 8/3/01 | Palm Beach Police Department Offense | | +| 323D-8 | 3/2/02 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Causgil | | +| | | Safe — 02-14029 — | | +| 323D-9 | Misc. | State of Florida v. | 1 | +| | | Circuit, Case No. 50-2002-MMM | 6 ocket | +| 323D-10 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sherif | ense | +| 323D-11 | | State of Florida v. Vi | rts, 15 Judicial | +| | | Circuit, Case No. 5 | 155872 - Docket | +| 323D-12 | 6/19/02 | Palm Bea | 1 .artment Offense | +| | | Re rt — Vir | ia Ro• | +| 323D-13 | | State of Flori• | . /rginia 156 Judicial | +| | | Circuit, | e No. 50-2002-TR-212355 - Docket | +| 323E-1 | 4/8/16 | Article — | ation lawsuits involving U.S. | +| 323E-2 | 1/6/15 | | and Paul Cassell v. Alan | +| | | rs wttz, | 1 Judicial Circuit, Broward County | +| 323E-3 | / | radley | and Paul Cassell v. Alan | +| | | Dershowitz, | 1 Judicial Circuit, Broward County | +| 323E-4 | 8/12/15 | | and Paul Cassell v. Alan | +| | | Dershowitz, | Circuit, Broward County | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323E-5 | 4/8/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-6 | 12/4/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability | | | | +| 323E-7 | 11/23/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Plaintiffs' Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records | | | | +| 323E-8 | 12/11/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Exhibit 6 to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment | | | | +| 323E-9 | 12/16/15 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Virginia [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-10 | 1/8/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-11 | 1/12/16 | Counter-Claim Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Dershowitz's First Amended Counterclaim | | | | +| 323E-12 | 1/26/16 | Bradley [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Alan Dershowitz's Opposition to [REDACTED] Motion to Strike and for Sanctions | | | | +| 323E-13 | 2/1/16 | [REDACTED] and Paul Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz, 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE 15-000072 - Defendant Dershowitz's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim and for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages Against Plaintiffs | | | | +| 323F-1 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – About Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323F-2 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 323F-3 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| 323F-4 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Doe v. U.S. | | | | +| 323F-5 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – In the News | | | | +| 323F-6 | | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Sexual Harassment and Abuse on Wall Street | | | | +| 323F-7 | | News Article – Boynton Woman wins \$71 million in lawsuit about rape on yacht | | | | +| 323F-8 | 1/29/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Verdict | | | | +| 323F-9 | 1/30/18 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction | | | | +| 323F-10 | 2/22/16 | Samantha Baca v. Island Girl, Ltd. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-11 | 7/1/15 | Michael Demella v. The Las Olas Holding Company , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-12 | 11/15/17 | The Las Olas Holding Company v. Michael Demella , 4 th DCA Case No. 4D16-231 - Mandate and 7/19/17 Opinion | | | | +| 323F-13 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Amended Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-14 | 2/1/17 | Norman Hirsch, et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC , USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 13-80456 – Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law | | | | +| 323F-15 | 11/18/16 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Judgment | | | | +| 323F-16 | 8/5/15 | Priscilla Rainey v. Jayceon Terrell Taylor , USDC ND Illinois, Case No, 15-C-6844 - Complaint | | | | +| 323F-17 | 12/6/11 | [REDACTED] Conner v. Clyde Enterprises, Inc. , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 10-002726 – Final Judgment | | | | +| 323F-18 | 10/21/14 | Michael Barnes v. Prince’s Beach Bar , 17 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 13-022624 – Verdict Form | | | | +| 323G-1 | | Property Records for 1109 N.E. 2 Street, Hallandale Beach, Florida | | | | +| 323G-2 | | Property Records for 10141 S.W. 40 th Street, Davie Florida | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 323G-3 | | Property Records for 2385 N.W. 34 Way, Coconut Creek, Florida | | | | +| 324 | | All court dockets and filings in all matters against Jeffrey Epstein relating to any victim's claims | | | | +| 324-1 | 7/11/08 | Victim's Reply to Government's Response to Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (D.E. 9) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-2 | 7/15/08 | Government's Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act (D.E. 13) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-3 | 7/15/08 | Declaration of ██████ Villafana in Support of United States' Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement (D.E. 14) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-4 | 7/11/08 | Transcript of hearing (D.E. 15) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-5 | 7/29/08 | Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing (D.E. 17) (( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-6 | 8/1/08 | Victim's Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Protection of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-7 | 9/25/08 | Victim's Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (D.E. 28) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-8 | 12/22/08 | Supplemental Declaration of ██████ Villafana (D.E. 35) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-9 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-10 | 9/13/10 | Petitioners' Notice in Response to Administrative Order Closing Case (D.E. 39) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-11 | 10/27/10 | Petitioners' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution (D.E. 41) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-12 | 10/28/10 | Order (D.E. 44) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-13 | 12/17/10 | Status Report (D.E. 45) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-14 | 9/2/11 | Motion for Limited Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 93) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-15 | 9/26/11 | Order (D.E. 99) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-16 | 10/14/11 | Epstein's Omnibus Reply in Support of his Motion for Limited Intervention (D.E. 108) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-17 | 12/5/11 | Petitioners' Protective Motion for Remedies (D.E. 128) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-18 | 3/29/12 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 159) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-19 | 4/17/12 | Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 for Production, Use and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations (D.E. 162) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-20 | 4/18/12 | Notice of Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (D.E. 163) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-21 | 6/18/13 | Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Proffer Government Correspondence in Support of CVRA Claims & Granting Motion to Unseal Correspondence and Related Unredacted Pleadings of Petitioners (D.E. 188) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-22 | 6/27/13 | Notice of Appeal of Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 195) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-23 | 7/8/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Protective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 207) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-24 | 7/12/13 | Petitioners' Response to Epstein's Motion for Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 209) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-25 | 7/26/13 | Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 215) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-26 | 8/8/13 | Petitioners' Response to Third Motion for "Limited" Intervention of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 221) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-27 | 8/9/13 | Epstein's Reply to Petitioners' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein for Limited Intervention (D.E. 222) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-28 | 2/13/14 | Order Granting Jeffrey Epstein's Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (D.E. 246) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-29 | 6/11/14 | Letter from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11 th Circuit with Judgment (D.E. 254) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-30 | 9/22/14 | Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 256) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-31 | 1/5/15 | Declaration of Alan Dershowitz (D.E. 282-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-32 | 1/14/15 | Order Requesting Justification for Intervenor Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order (D.E. 286) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-33 | 4/15/15 | Order Denying Intervenor's Motion for a Protective Order (D.E. 326) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324-34 | 2/10/16 | Petitioners' Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment With Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 361) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-35 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of E.W. (D.E. 361-26) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-36 | 1/28/15 | Declaration of L.M. (D.E. 324-36) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-37 | N/D | Court Docket ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 324-38 | 9/21/06 | Letter from James Eisenberg to A. [REDACTED] Villafana (D.E. 403-1) ( Jane Doe v. United States , U.S.D.C. S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736) | | | | +| 325 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 326 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 327 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 328 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 329 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 330 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 331 | | Any and all exhibits listed by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (by identifying these as exhibits, Plaintiff is not waiving his right to object to any of [REDACTED] exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] Atec + +By. /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Angela M. Many ( Primary: Scott@I in ockyiw.com Primary: Ka linkrocklaw.com Primary: Second Seco elinkrocklaw.com S anva®Iinkrtxklaw.com Eservice©Iinkrocklaw.com nkrocklaw.corn + +SiSittounsel for Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant Ac ci iie ffrey Epstein + +Gs' + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

|

Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

| | + +# EXHIBIT L + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +CO + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW A NI NT TO EXHIBIT LIST + +PlaintifKounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epst 3\ ' st in") hereby supplements his April 27, 2018, Motion to Allow Amendment to Exh- ist, d states: + +I. Counter-Plaintiff B C 700 new exhibits that Epstein erdgb late disclosed. Those documents were produced to ds e') complained about the more than on a rolling basis on ary 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018, and then identified individually on Eps 5, 2018, Clerk's Trial Exhibit List. (D.E. 1237.) + +2. to 135 ex tei as reviewed his proposed exhibits and significantly narrowed them down Amended Exhibit List is attached as Exhibit 1.' For the Court's and venience, Epstein has highlighted in yellow those documents that were produced on February 2, February 16 and March 2, 2018. Epstein has also included four new items (highlighted in blue), which include the audio of April 7, 2011, interview of + +&#x27;Epstein has renumbered his Exhibit List consecutively and will provide with a new set of the documents to correspond with his list. + +to include those documents. 3. Depending on the outcome of the Court's in camera review of the 47 documents has asserted a privilege claim over, Epstein seeks leave to amend his Exhibit List again + +(produced by a), the unofficial transcript filed with the Court in May 2011, an official transcript prepared by a court reporter and a comparison of the two transcripts prepared by a court reporter.2 + +4. will not be prejudiced by the amendment because olf tents come as no surprise, had many of them in his possession or knew abo t e or to the February and March 2018 productions, and the documents were produces in exhibits more than two months ago. + +Accordingly, for the reasons set forth here ia SS, i r .sotion to Allow Amendment to his Exhibit List, Epstein respectfully requests tha e grant his Motion. + +,Epstein will provide the transcript and comparison prepared by the court reporter once they are finalized. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on May 2, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By. Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 Kara Berard Rockenbac 44903) Rachel J. Glasser (Fr5 ) Primary: Scott@lin ockljiw.com Primary: Ka linkrocklaw.com Primary: Ainkrocklaw.com Second Seco linkrocklaw.com + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach es West Palm Beac L 33 m scarolateam(4searcylaw.com terryteam@searcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff Cl. . C AS) h & Shipley, P.A. yard + +ou sel for PlainuffiCounter-Defendant pstein + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb®FLAppellateLaw.com njse.FLAppellateLaw.com kbt@FLAnnellateLaw.com Co-Counseictiendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +# **EXHIBIT 1** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA04080WOODCMI3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, DRAFT + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +/ + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE\*FREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED EX 14/ BIN ST + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey E at the trial of this matter. Epstein reserves 1 rl t to amend this list once the Court makes a final determination on his request for an review of Counter-Plaintiff alleged privilege documents and e videntiary issues in this case. y lists the exhibits that he may introduce + +### X TO OBJECTIONS + +A Cos + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objectio 6. Opinion +- 2. All obj xcept authenticity 7. Hearsay + - 8. Authenticity lacking + - 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) +- 3. r immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (403) +- 5. Privileged + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | | Jeffi-ey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, I and L.M. | +| | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant J. | +| 3 | 8/2/10 | | +| 4 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of J. | +| 5 | 7/31/12 | tein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice | +| | | of J. | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | J. Fourth Amended | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffre E stem | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summ | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothst ey J. and L.M. | +| | | 151b Judicial Circuit Case 5 0 9-CA-040800XXXXMB | +| | | Deposition T ns is and Statements | +| 11 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcri dle J. | +| 12 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Tmnsc o ley J. | +| 13 | 10/10/13 | Deposition T of radle J. | +| 14 | 11/10/17 | Deposition T ri t f J. | +| 15 | 3/17/10 | Deposition T t of Jeffrey Epstein | +| 16 | 1/25/12 | D sit ranscn t of Jeffre E stem | +| 17 | 6/14/12 | De siti nscript of Scott Rothstein | +| 18 | 4/20/11 | sitio ranscript of S. Adler | +| 19 | 5/25/11 | on Transcript of Abraxas Discala | +| 20 | 2/11 | position Transcript of Kretschmar | +| 21 | | sition Transcript of Michael Le aro | +| 22 | 10/1 | 7 Deposition Transcript of E.W. | +| 23 | 12/1/ 7 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen | +| 24 | 2/23/18 | Deposition Transcript of William Berger | +| 25 | 2/ | /113 De ion Transcri .t of E.W. | +| 26 | 4/7/11 | Audio of and Jack Scarola's | +| 27 | 5/17/11 | Notice of Filing Transcript of | +| | | Interview (aR 325) | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 28 | | Transcript of the audio tape of | +| | | interview of prepared by | +| 29 | | Comparison of the unofficial transcript filed by | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, S. | +| 30 | 4/12/10 | E tein's R uest to Produce to | +| 31 | 5/11/10 | Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of | +| 32 | 5/11/10 | Response to Plaintiff's Request | +| 33 | 6/21/10 | Est 's Request for Admissions to | +| 34 | 7/7/10 | | +| 35 | 4/7/11 | E stein's Request for Prod on wards | +| 36 | 5/5/11 | Response to E. s in Request to | +| | | Produce dated April 7 '4 1 | +| 37 | 5/16/11 | E stein's Interroga es , awards | +| 38 | 6/10/11 | Answ e gatories | +| 39 | 12/9/11 | E.stein's Sec d R t for Production to | +| 40 | 1/6/12 | nswers to Epstein's Third Set of | +| 41 | 1/6/12 | s' esponse to Request for Production | +| 42 | 2/21/13 | ' Supplemental Response to Epstein's | +| | | u t for Production dated December 9, 2011 | +| 43 | 7/25 | ards' Response to Epstein's Request for | +| 44 | 8/1 7 a | Answers to Interrogatories | +| 45 | 9/5/17 | E tein's R uest for Production to | +| 46 | 10/5/17 | Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, | +| 47 | 10/5/17 | Response to Epstein's September 5, | +| 48 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to | +| 49 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 50 | 11/13/17 | Answers to Epstein's Expert | +| 51 | 11/13/17 | Response to Epstein's Request to | +| 52 | N/D | Privilege Log — Emails November 2009 | +| | 4/24/07 | FBI Reports / Statements A1"\" 53 Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. AS , | +| 54 | 10/4/07 | FBI report for October 2, 2007, interview of Jane | +| 55 | 8/7/07 | | +| 56 | 2/8/08 | FBI report for January 31, 2008, interview of | +| 57 | 5/30/08 | FBI report for May 28, 2008, interview of 14) | +| | | 151° Judicial Circuit Case No. 2 -028051XXXXMB | +| 58 | Misc. | Court docket | +| | 9/11/08 | _ Complaint | +| 60 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | +| 61 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of F. ddress | +| 62 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein' & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to Pia' h ended Complaint | +| 63 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's R est f ction to Defendant | +| 64 | 8/12/09 | Notice of P ' from Non-Party — Greens | +| 65 | 8/14/09 | Notice o o uction from Non-Party — | +| | | P rmacy | +| 66 | 8/19/09 | e t Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 67 | 8/19 | | +| 68 | 8/20/ | Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production | +| 69 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) | +| 70 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| 71 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding | +| | | Depositions of Visoski and David Hart | +| 72 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of | +| 73 | 5/14/10 | Printout of L.M.'sM ace a e | +| 74 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 75 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 76 | Misc. | Court docket | +| 77 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. 1) 'L.) | +| 78 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D. | +| 79 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | +| | | 151h Judicial Circuit Case No. -028058XXXXMB | +| 80 | Misc. | Court docket | +| 81 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | +| 82 | 12/23/08 3/30/09 | Amended Complaint ?S\ 83 Notice of Change of ddress | +| 84 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstel ' s & Affirmative | +| | | Defenses to PI ' ti ended Complaint | +| 85 | 5/18/09 | Notice of Tak g D ition Duces Tecum to | +| | | Myspace with ace's production in response | +| 86 | i 6/2/09 | Defend Motion for Order to Terminate | +| | | or Limit ition and Response in Opposition to | +| | | P i tiff's ended Motion to Compel for | +| 87 | 7/16/09 | Lt .s otice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of | +| | | r . o Rodriguez | +| 88 | | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 89 | 8/1' Y | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative | +| 90 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | +| 91 | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. and Video of | +| 92 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | +| 93 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | +| 94 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893 | | | | | | +| 95 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 96 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 97 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | | | | +| 98 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | | | | +| 99 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 100 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 101 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | +| 102 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, Nadia Marcinkova, Jean Luc Bruhel, Sarah Kellen, Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 103 | 9/30/09 | Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe and Video of Deposition | | | | +| 104 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 105 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | +| Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119 | | | | | | +| 106 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 107 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 108 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 109 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | +| 110 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 111 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | + +## CVRA Co cations + +| 112 | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villaf | o | +|-----|----------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 113 | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | Vill | E. | +| 114 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | t | | +| 115 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. Smi | o | Eisenberg | +| 116 | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. S | J | e Doe | +| 117 | 7/3/08 | Letter from B | | to Ann C. | +| 118 | 7/9/08 | Letter f | A. | Villafana to Brad re | +| 119 | 7/9/08 | r fro | A. | Villafana to Brad re | +| 120 | 7/17/08 | tte | rom Brad | to Ann Villafana | +| 121 | 1 | tter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 122 | 10/ | 08 Letter from Brad | | to Dexter Lee | +| 123 | 12/10/ 0 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 124 | 3/1/11 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | +| 125 | 3/15/11 | | Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell | | +| 126 | 3/20/11 | | Letter from R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | | +| 127 | 3/22/11 | Letter from | J. | and Paul Cassell to | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 128 | 9/29/11 | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | | | | +| Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV | | | | | | +| 129 | N/D | Court Docket | | | | +| 130 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 131 | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra | | | | +| 132 | 9/9/10 | Order Closing Case (D.E. 38) | | | | +| Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE | | | | | | +| 133 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 134 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR | | | | | | +| 135 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8) | | | | +| 136 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74) | | | | +| 137 | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler | | | | +| 138 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman | | | | +| 139 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 140 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I | | | | +| 141 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II | | | | +| 142 | 7/2/13 | Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum | | | | | | +| 143 | 11/9/09 | Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 144 | 11/23/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 145 | 11/27/09 | Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### The Florida Bar Matters + +| 146 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against █████ J. █████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 147 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | +| 148 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against █████ James █████ ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | +| | | | | | +| | | | | | +| | | | | | + +### United States of America v. othstein + +# USDC S.D. Fla. C 4 . -60331 + +| 149 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +|-----|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 150 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 151 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### Razorback turd: LC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al. + +### 17th Judicial Cir • roward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 + +| 152 | Misc. | Court d et | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 153 | 11/20/09 | Complai | +| 154 | 11/25/09 | ended omplaint | +| 155 | 12/12/11 | ition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | +| | | a.; e oon Session | +| 156 | 12/1 | 110 .osition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 157 | 12/1 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 158 | 12/14/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 159 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 160 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 161 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 162 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 163 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 164 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — P.M. | +| 165 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 166 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 167 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 168 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 169 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothste' | +| 170 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. R to | +| | | Comm • is on | + +### Comm • is on + +| 171 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to ██████ J.
██████, cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +|-----|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 172 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to ██████
Adler (01620) | | | | +| 173 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to ██████
Adler (01446) | | | | +| 174 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to ██████ J.
Edwards, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. ██████ (01726) | | | | +| 175 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to ██████ J.
Edwards (05725) | | | | +| 176 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-██████ il chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Russel
Adler (01574) | | | | +| 177 | 5/20/09
9:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William
Berger (02231) | | | | +| 178 | 5/21/09
3:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William Berger to ██████
██████ and Susan Stirling (01300) | | | | +| 179 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan
Spencer Wendel (01449) | | | | +| 180 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to
██████ J. ██████ (05148) | | | | +| 181 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Timothy
Malloy (01450) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 182 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to ██████ J. (05151) | | | | +| 183 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to ██████ J. (05161) | | | | +| 184 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to William J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 185 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to ██████ J. ██████ J. ██████ J. ██████ (01735) | | | | +| 186 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan K. Stirling, cc ██████ (01410) | | | | +| 187 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 188 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 189 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 190 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. ██████ (05239) | | | | +| 191 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 192 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05277-05278) | | | | +| 193 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 194 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. Edwards (05324-05325) | | | | +| 195 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 196 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. Edwards (05344-05346) | | | | +| 197 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 198 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05368-05369) | | | | +| 199 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 200 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05387-05388) | | | | +| 201 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 202 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 203 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee
(01462) | | | | +| 204 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 205 | 7/13/09
3:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01464) | | | | +| 206 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | +| 207 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 208 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 209 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01661) | | | | +| 210 | 7/20/09
8:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01403) | | | | +| 211 | 7/20/09
10:45 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Russell Adler (02684-02685) | | | | +| 212 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 213 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 214 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05803) | | | | +| 215 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662) | | | | +| 216 | 7/22/09 | Letter from Bradley J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 217 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 218 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 219 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070) | | | | +| 220 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 221 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848) | | | | +| 222 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 223 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11075-11076) | | | | +| 224 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(05852-05853) | | | | +| 225 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 226 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 227 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 228 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J.
(11080-11082) | | | | +| 229 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie ██████ to ██████
(05087) | | | | +| 230 | 8/2/09
1:15 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to William Berger (03694) | | | | +| 231 | 8/10/09
5:44 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Edwards to Jacquie ██████ (15113-15114) | | | | +| 232 | 8/10/09
5:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Edwards to Jacquie ██████ (00158) | | | | +| 233 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 234 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 235 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06967) | | | | +| 236 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 237 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
Edwards (06963-06964) | | | | +| 238 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 239 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06959-06960) | | | | +| 240 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06975) | | | | +| 241 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 242 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 243 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to ██████ J.
(06976-06977) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 244 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442) | | | | +| 245 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 246 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 247 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113) | | | | +| 248 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat (05112) | | | | +| 249 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | +| 250 | 8/26/09
5:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley [REDACTED] (01406) | | | | +| 251 | 8/26/09
9:56 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269) | | | | +| 252 | 8/31/09
10:58 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (02895) | | | | +| 253 | 9/2/09
12:54 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat and Mike Fisten (01376) | | | | +| 254 | 9/4/09
11:18 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell and William Berger (02043) | | | | +| 255 | 9/7/09
1:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07612-07613) | | | | +| 256 | 9/7/09
6:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (02595-02596) | | | | +| 257 | 9/7/09
6:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED] (07614-07615) | | | | +| 258 | 9/7/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07605-07606) | | | | +| 259 | 9/7/09
8:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07607-07608) | | | | +| 260 | 9/7/09
10:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07609-07611) | | | | +| 261 | 9/8/09
11:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04015) | | | | +| 262 | 9/8/09
11:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07646) | | | | +| 263 | 9/8/09
11:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07647) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 264 | 9/8/09
12:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07676-07677) | | | | +| 265 | 9/8/09
1:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07674-07675) | | | | +| 266 | 9/8/09
2:04 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07678-07679) | | | | +| 267 | 9/8/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07684-07685) | | | | +| 268 | 9/8/09
2:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07682-07683) | | | | +| 269 | 9/8/09
2:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07695-07697) | | | | +| 270 | 9/8/09
3:25 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07680-07681) | | | | +| 271 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07686-07688) | | | | +| 272 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (07689-07691) | | | | +| 273 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 274 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361) | | | | +| 275 | 9/17/09
12:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to William
Berger (02088) | | | | +| 276 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318) | | | | +| 277 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 278 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 279 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 280 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 281 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 282 | 9/23/09
12:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul
Cassell (08459) | | | | +| 283 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 284 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (04321) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 285 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319) | | | | +| 286 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589) | | | | +| 287 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 288 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 289 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 290 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (19986-19987) | | | | +| 291 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 292 | 10/1/09
1:24 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08348-08349) | | | | +| 293 | 10/1/09
1:30 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08355) | | | | +| 294 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Nigel
Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 295 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 296 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 297 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 298 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael
Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 299 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 300 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 301 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard
[REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 302 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott
Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip
Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED]
(26507) | | | | +| 303 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 304 | 10/13/09
2:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J.
Discala, [REDACTED] Kretschmar and D. Von Allmen
(23299-23300) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 305 | 10/13/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26827) | | | | +| 306 | 10/13/09
4:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26094-26096) | | | | +| 307 | 10/13/09
5:38 p.m. | E-mail chain – from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27277-27278) | | | | +| 308 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 309 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 310 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 311 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 312 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 313 | 10/15/09
8:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, D. Von Allmen (26882) | | | | +| 314 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 315 | 10/16/09
11:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Wheeler to Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] Edwards and Pat [REDACTED] (01255) | | | | +| 316 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 317 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 318 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 319 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 320 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | +| 321 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | | | | +| 322 | 10/22/09
1:48 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996) | | | | +| 323 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 324 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 325 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 326 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 327 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 328 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 329 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01623) | | | | +| 330 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 331 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01625) | | | | +| 332 | 3/17/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 333 | 3/18/10
1:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. Schmidt to Tom Hartog and Donnie | | | | +| 334 | 3/23/10 | Wackenhut Incident Report | | | | +| 335 | 3/24/10
2:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog | | | | +| 336 | 4/1/10
3:50 a.m. | E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Story Cowles | | | | +| 337 | 10/14/10 | Affidavit of Ken Jenne | | | | +| Billing | | | | | | +| 338 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000001-BJE0000000005) | | | | +| 339 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 340 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 341 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Miscellaneous | | | | | | +| 342 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | | +| 343 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | | +| 344 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 345 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] | | | | +| 346 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr.
( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | | +| 347 | 11/16/17 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| J. [REDACTED] – Presentations, Recognitions, Bios | | | | | | +| 348 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse | | | | +| 349 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James Edwards | | | | +| 350 | N/D | National Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 351 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory ( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17 ) | | | | +| 352 | 5/14/13 | The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad Edwards
( http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad/[REDACTED]/4409/ ) | | | | +| 353 | 5/14/13 | Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ( http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/ ) | | | | +| 354 | 11/8/17 | The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 355 | 10/30/04 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 356 | 10/30/05 | Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED] | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Jaffe's Website | | | | | | +| 357 | 11/9/17 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout ( https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/ ) | | | | +| 358 | 5/7/12 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 359 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Investigation ) | | | | +| 360 | 1/16/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/ ) | | | | +| 361 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Home ) | | | | +| 362 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable_Cases ) | | | | +| 363 | 5/14/13 | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 364 | 5/14/13 | Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 365 | | Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Jaffe with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post . Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com . Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review . Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News . Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5 . Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6 . Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami . Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver | | | | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel . Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review . The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender | | | | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post . Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case | | | | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News . Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea" | | | | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel . Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender | | | | +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post . Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein | | | | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily News . Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami , Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor | | | | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel . Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award | | | | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily Business Review . Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011 | | | | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Daily Business Review . Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | | | | +| X. | 4/22/11 | Palm Beach Daily Business Review . Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends | | | | +| 366 | 8/10/16 | ██████ Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com . The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News . Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known | | | | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel . Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | | | | +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News . Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News . Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | ██████ Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review . Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| ██████ Pottinger's Website & Verdicts | | | | | | +| 367 | 1/29/18 | ██████ Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 368 | 1/29/18 | ██████ Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| ██████ J. ██████ Lawsuits | | | | | | +| 369 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; ██████ James ██████; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-██████ | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 370 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED] | | | | +| 371 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 372 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 373 | Misc. | Docket; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 374 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 375 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 376 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 377 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 378 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 379 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 380 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 381 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 382 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 383 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 384 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 385 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 386 | Misc. | Docket; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 387 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 388 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 389 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 390 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 391 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 392 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 393 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 394 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 395 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 396 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 397 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 398 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 399 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 400 | | Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 401 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 402 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 403 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 404 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Experts | | | | | | +| 405 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +| 406 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 407 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in Virginia [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 408 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| | | | | | | +| Other Articles | | | | | | +| 409 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 410 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 411 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 412 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 413 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 414 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 415 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 416 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 417 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 418 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 419 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 420 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 421 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 422 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | +| 423 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 424 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 425 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 426 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part III | | | | +| 427 | 11/18/09 | Former RRA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 428 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 429 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 430 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 431 | 11/22/09 | George Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 432 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 433 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 434 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 435 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 436 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 437 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 438 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys | +| 439 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After | +| 440 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One | +| 441 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | +| 442 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and | +| 443 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | +| 444 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three | +| | | L.M. and E.W. — Public c \$ | +| 445 | 6/28/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O | +| 446 | N/D | Demons Cycle Photographs depictEiNkand/or | +| | | L. P A14/ Necords | +| 447 | | License Details - L. ' I ialist | +| 448 | 2/6/03 | Palm Beach Coun al e Office Offense | +| 449 | 6/29/03 | Palm Beach rill's Office Offense | +| 450 | 1/5/04 | Anna T v. Scott , 15th Judicial Circuit, | +| | | Palm B unty Case No. 2004 DR 001691 | +| | | P on fo Injunction for Protection Against | +| | | e t Violence | +| 451 | 2/8/04 | Poilm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 452 | | alm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 453 | 7/6/ | In re L.M., 151h Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach | +| 454 | 7/18/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 455 | 10/4/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 456 | 1/8/08 | Justin Sprague v. L.M. , 20th Judicial Circuit, Lee County Case No. 08-DR-003141 - Petition to Determine Paternity | | | | +| 457 | 2/26/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965 | | | | +| 458 | 4/17/09 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050 | | | | +| 459 | 2010 | Twitter Account – L.M. | | | | +| 460 | 4/16/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-10-1058307 | | | | +| 461 | 1/14/12 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901 | | | | +| 462 | 2/10/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; West Palm Beach Police Department, Report No. 94-12-2384 | | | | +| 463 | 1/6/13 | Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 42-13-00742 | | | | +| 464 | 7/23/13 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174 | | | | +| 465 | 12/7/14 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173 | | | | +| 466 | 11/5/15 | Lexine Turney v. L.M. , 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| | | | | | | +| E.W. – Public Records | | | | | | +| 467 | 1/23/18 | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 088078-3334 | | | | +| 468 | 9/20/13 | Special Warranty Deed from Homes by West Bay, LLC to E.W. | | | | +| 469 | 7/18/14 | General Warranty Deed from E.W. to Michael C. Dolski | | | | +| 470 | | Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Information; Parcel Folio 207384-0000 | | | | +| 471 | 2/24/15 | Warranty Deed from William C. Moody and Carole M. Shelton to James S. Moody, III and E.W. | | | | +| 472 | 1/15/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal History Information Report on E.W. | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 473 | 8/2/02 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report No. 2040097 | | | | +| 474 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-067231 | | | | +| 475 | 5/15/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-067249 | | | | +| 476 | 5/20/03 | Eva [REDACTED] v. James R. Gebbia , 15 th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 03-1633; Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence | | | | +| 477 | 7/20/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-091886 | | | | +| 478 | 8/1/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 03-096606 | | | | +| 479 | 8/5/03 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 03-098088 | | | | +| 480 | 8/5/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 03-19767 | | | | +| 481 | 8/28/03 | West Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 03-21604 | | | | +| 482 | 5/22/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 04-070605 and Lake Worth Police Department Information Sheet Case No. 04-20500 | | | | +| 483 | 3/31/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 06-049448 | | | | +| 484 | 11/9/06 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 06-133067 | | | | +| 485 | 12/6/06 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Boynton Beach Police Department Report No. 34-06-61580 | | | | +| 486 | 6/9/07 | Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report No. 7028375 | | | | +| 487 | 6/15/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; [REDACTED] Palm Beach Police Department Report No. 86-07-603178 | | | | +| 488 | 6/15/07 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report Case No. 07-603178 | | | | +| 489 | 9/4/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Boynton Beach Police Department Report No. 34-07-140204 | | | | +| 490 | 5/30/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause Affidavit and Offense Report; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-09-085397 | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 491 | 9/5/09 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 492 | 4/4/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 493 | 5/8/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 494 | 5/12/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 495 | 5/13/12 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 496 | 12/31/12 | State of Florida v. E.W., 1 lth Judicial C. ui | +| 497 | 1/8/14 | State of Florida v. E. W., 11i° J i ircuit, | +| | | Miami Dade County Case 32 - | +| 498 | 6/21/13 | Florida DUI Uniform c Ci tion, Pinellas | +| | | County, Officer W d Complaint/Arrest | +| 499 | 11/20/15 | State of Flori C v. E. , 131° Judicial Circuit, | +| | | Hillsborough un Case No. 2015-CF-016193; | +| 500 | 4/4/16 | Crimina 'citr . Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | R rt N. 6-190831; Case No. 16-4733 | +| 501 | 4/4/16 | C jna1 Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear | +| | | Po 0. 16-190881 | +| 502 | 12/5 | to of Florida v. E. W., 13t° Judicial Circuit Court, | +| 503 | | Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property | +| 504 | 11/1/10 | General Warranty Deed from Glenn R. | +| 505 | 3/12/14 | Warranty Deed from Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------| +| 506 | 1/18/18 | Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal | +| 507 | 7/12/00 | Arrest Affidavit. Dial | +| 508 | 10/5/00 | State of Florida v. Tammy Huff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County — Dinition of Jane Doe | +| 509 | 2/7/02 | State of Florida v. Tammy=Huff 19th Judicial | +| | | Circuit, County Case No, 00-875-CFA — | +| 510 | 7/23/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 511 | 8/27/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report No. 02-108484 OP" | +| 512 | 9/10/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 513 | 9/17/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offe | +| | | Report No. 02-116357 yy | +| 514 | 9/18/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Bye | +| 515 | 10/3/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's a ense | +| 516 | 5/9/03 | State of Florida v. Bra Dia 911' Judicial | +| | | Circuit, Cou o. 00-375 — | +| 517 | 9/19/03 | Palm Beach Cq iffs Office Offense | +| 518 | 9/24/03 | Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | Report - 16298 | +| 519 | 9/29/03 | P BeaCounty Sheriff's Office Offense | +| | | rt No. 03-118053 | +| 520 | 12/1/03 | es Im Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 521 | I/ | est Palm Beach Police Department Report No. | +| 522 | 10/7 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 523 | 12/2/04 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 524 | 1/9/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | +| 525 | 2/23/05 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------| +| 526 | 12/26/06 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 527 | 4/28/07 | Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause | +| 528 | 9/12/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear; Delray Beach Police | +| 529 | 12/9/10 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | +| 530 | 2/2/11 | Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | + +### - Pub + +| 531 | 11/4/97 | Palm Beach Police Departmen | | +|-----|---------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 532 | 1/29/98 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's | c ffense | +| 533 | 2/3/98 | Palm Beach County Sherif s | c Offense | +| | | Report Case No. 98-0 | Vfr | +| 534 | 2/28/98 | Palm Beach Coun | e ffice Offense | +| 535 | N/D | In re Daniel | berts , 15 Judicial Circuit, Palm | +| | | Beach County | o. 50-2000-GA-000718 - | +| 536 | 6/10/01 | Pa | ch Police Department Offense | +| | | R rt CCaabe | No. 01-002214 | +| 537 | 8/3/01 | o Palm Beach Police Department Offense | | +| 538 | 3/2/ | ,, Notice to Appear and Probable Cause | | +| 539 | Mis . | State of Florida v. | 15 Judicial | +| 540 | 6/2/02 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense | | + +J. and Paul Cassell v. Dershowilz 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. CACE-1500072 + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 541 | 1/6/15 | Complaint | | | | +| 542 | 4/8/16 | Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment | | | | +| 543 | 4/8/16 | Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement | | | | +| | | | | | | +| General | | | | | | +| 544 | | All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, ██████ J. ██████ or any witnesses listed by either party | | | | +| 545 | | All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery and any documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits, in all matters identified herein | | | | +| 546 | | All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter | | | | +| 547 | | All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts | | | | +| 548 | | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered | | | | +| 549 | | All foundation exhibits | | | | +| 550 | | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | | | | +| 551 | | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups | | | | +| 552 | | All newly discovered documents/exhibits | | | | +| 553 | | Any and all exhibits listed by ██████ J. ██████ (by identifying these as exhibits, Epstein is not waiving his right to object to any of ██████ exhibits introduced at trial) | | | | + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on \_\_\_\_\_, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] + +By: \_\_\_\_\_ +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Rachel J. Glasser (FBN 577251) +Primary: [Scott@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Scott@linkrocklaw.com) +Primary: [Kara@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Kara@linkrocklaw.com) +Primary: [Rachel@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Rachel@linkrocklaw.com) +Secondary: [Tina@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Tina@linkrocklaw.com) +Secondary: [Troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:Troy@linkrocklaw.com) + +*Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant +Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFICATE + +# EXHIBIT M + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXX3UVIBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY c EXHIBIT LIST + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pu Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and Media introduce at the trial of this matter.' E ourt's August 3, 2018, Order Setting es, hereby lists the exhibits that he may es his right to amend this list once the Court makes a final determination on his reque r an in camera review of Counter-Plaintiff EMalleged privilege docL iviDonis fia any other evidentiary issues in this case. + +S SA + +### EX TO OBJECTIONS + +- 0. No Objection +- I. All objectio +- 2. All o xcept authenticity +- 3. Irrel ant or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (403) +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +&#x27;The documents identified on this Exhibit List have previously been disclosed and provided to =I A new set of the documents, however, are being provided to Ell/ counsel.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB
112/7/09Complaint with Exhibits
212/21/09Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
38/2/10
8/9/10		Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to L.M., Individually Only
43/27/12Notice of Appearance of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
57/31/12Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to [REDACTED] Counterclaim
68/16/12Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
71/9/13[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim
89/25/13Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein
96/30/17Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein
106/30/17Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment
Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M.
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB
Deposition Transcripts and Statements
113/23/10Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
125/15/13Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
1310/10/13Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
1411/10/17Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
153/17/10Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein
161/25/12Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein
176/14/12Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein
184/20/11Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] S. Adler
195/25/11Deposition Transcript of Abraxas [REDACTED] Discala with exhibits
202/11/11Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Kretschmar
213/11/11Deposition Transcript of Michael Legamaro
2210/12/17Deposition Transcript of E.W.
2312/1/17Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen
242/23/18Deposition Transcript of William Berger
252/26/18Deposition Transcript of E.W.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
264/7/11Audio of [REDACTED] and Jack Scarola's telephonic interview of [REDACTED]
275/17/11[REDACTED] Notice of Filing Transcript of [REDACTED] April 7, 2011, telephonic Interview (D.E. 325)
28---Open
29----Open
+Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M. 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMB
+Written Discovery +
304/12/10Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED]
315/11/10[REDACTED] Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories
325/11/10[REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production
336/21/10Epstein's Request for Admissions to Edwards
347/7/10[REDACTED] Response to First Request for Admissions
354/7/11Epstein's Request for Production to Edwards
365/5/11[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Request to Produce dated April 7, 2011
375/16/11Epstein's Interrogatories to Edwards
386/10/11[REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories
3912/9/11Epstein's Second Request for Production to [REDACTED]
401/6/12Edwards' Answers to Epstein's Third Set of Interrogatories
411/6/12Edwards' Response to Request for Production
422/21/13Edwards' Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011
437/25/13Edwards' Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated June 25, 2013
448/11/17[REDACTED] Answers to Interrogatories
459/5/17Epstein's Request for Production to [REDACTED]
4610/5/17[REDACTED] Answers to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Interrogatories
4710/5/17[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production
4810/13/17Epstein's Request to Produce to [REDACTED]
4910/13/17Epstein's Expert Interrogatories to [REDACTED]
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
5011/13/17 a'Answers to Epstein's Expert
5111/13/17Response to Epstein's Request to
52N/DPrivilege Log — Emails November 2009
4/24/07FBI Reports / Statements A1"\" 53 Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. AS ,
5410/4/07FBI report for October 2, 2007, interview of Jane
558/7/07
562/8/08FBI report for January 31, 2008, interview of
575/30/08FBI report for May 28, 2008, interview of o
151h Judicial Circuit Case No. 5 2 -028051 XXXXMB
58Misc.Court docket
599/11/08Complaint
6012/23/08 3/30/09Amended Complaint (S\ 61 Notice of Change of F ddress
624/7/09Defendant Epstein & Affirmative
Defenses to PI ' ended Complaint
638/11/09Plaintiff's R est f r roduction to Defendant
648/12/09Notice of Pr ' from Non-Party — Greens
658/14/09Notice o o uction from Non-Party —
P nnacy
668/19/09e t Epstein's Answer & Affirmative
fe es to Plaintiff's Second Amended Com laint
678/19
688/20/Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production
698/24/09Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1)
709/24/09Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
7110/13/09Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding
Depositions of Visoski and David Hart
722/9/10Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of
735/14/10Printout of L.M.'s M ace a e
745/28/10Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint
757/22/10Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice
76Misc.Court docket
777/24/09Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. 1) L.)
787/20/10Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.
79N/DFederal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11
E.W. v. Jeffrey e
IS'" Judicial Circuit Case No. -028058XXXXMB
80Misc.Court docket
819/10/08Complaint
8212/23/08Amended Complaint ( S \
833/30/09Notice of Change of F ddress
844/6/09Defendant Epstet ' s r & Affirmative
Defenses to PI -nu Amended Complaint
855/18/09Notice of Tak- g D sition Duces Tecum to
Myspace with ce's production in response
866/2/09Defend Motion for Order to Terminate
or Limit ition and Response in Opposition to
P ntiff's ended Motion to Compel for
an o s
877/16/09otice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of
88Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land
898/IDefendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative
908/20/09Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land
915/6/10Deposition Transcript of E.W. and Video of
925/28/10Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint
937/22/10Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice
947/29/10Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
      

Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
95Misc.Court docket
968/12/08Complaint (D.E. 1)
973/26/09Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24)
984/9/09Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30)
994/9/09Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32)
1004/17/09Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38)
1015/14/09Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56)
1027/28/09 to 10/22/09Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, Nadia Marcinkova, Jean Luc Bruhel, Sarah Kellen, Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka
1039/30/09Deposition Transcript of Jane Doe and Video of Deposition
1047/20/10Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210)
1057/20/10Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119
106Misc.Court docket
1076/19/09Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction
Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets
Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of
Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond
to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165)

ane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) dockeUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
1087/23/09Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217)
10910/16/09Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357)
11010/30/09Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386)
11111/5/09Order (D.E. 400)

CVRA Co cations

1128/11/06Letter from A.Villao
1136/7/07Letter from A.VillaE.
1141/10/08Letter from T.t
1151/10/08Letter from T. SmioEisenberg
1165/30/08Letter from T. SJe Doe
1177/3/08Letter from Bto Ann C.
1187/9/08Letter fA.Villafana to Brad re
1197/9/08r froA.Villafana to Brad re
1207/17/08tterom Bradto Ann Villafana
1211tter from Bradto Dexter Lee
12210/08 Letter from Bradto Dexter Lee
12312/10/ 0Letter fromJ.and Paul Cassell to
1243/1/11Letter fromJ.and Paul Cassell to
1253/15/11Letter from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell
1263/20/11Letter from R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it
1273/22/11Letter fromJ.and Paul Cassell to
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
1289/29/11Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer
Jane Doe v. United States of America (CVRA)
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV
129N/DCourt Docket
1307/7/08Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1)
1318/14/08Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra
1329/9/10Order Closing Case (D.E. 38)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein
17th Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE
133Misc.Court docket
13411/3/09Amended Complaint
In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR
13511/16/09Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee and Objection to Retention of Chief Restructuring Officer (D.E. 8)
13612/1/09Verified Complaint for Damages and Other Relief (D.E. 74)
13710/28/10Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] Adler
1382/23/11Privilege Log of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman
13912/12/11Transcript of Rule 2004 Examination of Scott W. Rothstein
14012/23/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume I
14112/23/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Volume II
1427/2/13Deposition Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola
United States of America v. Scott Rothstein – Forfeiture Action
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum
14311/9/09Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1)
14411/23/09Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 14)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
14511/27/09Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 19)

The Florida Bar Matters

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
14611/9/09The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against █████ J. █████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein
14711/25/09Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146
1486/24/10The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against █████ James █████; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B)

United States of America v. othstein

USDC S.D. Fla. C 4 . -60331

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
14912/1/09Information charging Scott W. Rothstein
1501/25/10Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein
1519/26/17Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938)

Razorback and LC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.

17th Judicial Cir • roward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943

152Misc.Court d et
15311/20/09Complai
15411/25/09ended omplaint
15512/12/11ition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein
15612/1NO .osition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
15712/1Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
15812/14/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
15912/15/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
16012/15/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
16112/16/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein —
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
16212/16/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Second Session
16312/19/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session
16412/19/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – P.M. Session
16512/20/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session
16612/20/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session
16712/21/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session
16812/21/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session
16912/22/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session
17012/22/11Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein
Communication
1714/8/09
2:58 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Russell Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Mark S. Nurik (01404)
1724/22/09
4:51 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01620)
1734/24/09
5:07 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01446)
1745/19/09
10:33 a.m.		E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, Russell Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew D. Weissing and Gary M. [REDACTED] (01726)
1755/19/09
12:00 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05725)
1765/19/09
12:03 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Russell Adler (01574)
1775/20/09
9:58 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (02231)
1785/21/09
3:13 p.m.		E-mail chain - from William Berger to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Susan Stirling (01300)
1795/22/09
12:13 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendell (01449)
1805/22/09
12:21 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05148)
1815/26/09
4:57 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Timothy Malloy (01450)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
1825/26/09
5:33 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to ██████ J. ██████ (05151)
1835/28/09
2:13 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to ██████ J. ██████ (05161)
1845/28/09
2:16 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to William J. Berger (02241-02242)
1856/3/09
5:17 p.m.		E-mail chain - from William J Berger to ██████ J. ██████ cc ██████ Adler and ██████ J. ██████ (01735)
1866/4/09
10:43 a.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan K. Stirling, cc ██████ (01410)
1876/9/09
3:10 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Eric Glasser (06655)
1886/23/09
12:52 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632)
1896/23/09
1:03 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. Edwards to Paul Cassell (01634)
1906/23/09
1:13 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. ██████ (05239)
1916/23/09
1:16 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05203)
1926/23/09
1:29 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05277-05278)
1936/23/09
2:31 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05207-05208)
1946/23/09
2:41 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. Edwards (05324-05325)
1956/23/09
2:53 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05212-05213)
1966/23/09
3:08 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. Edwards (05344-05346)
1976/23/09
3:12 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05215-05217)
1986/23/09
4:39 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05368-05369)
1996/23/09
5:22 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05220-05221)
2006/23/09
5:28 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to ██████ J. ██████ (05387-05388)
2016/24/09
9:39 a.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Michele Dargan (05224-05225)
2027/8/09
12:33 p.m.		E-mail chain - from ██████ ██████ to Paul Cassell (07304)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
2037/8/09
3:36 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee
(01462)
2047/13/09
2:28 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404)
2057/13/09
3:20 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01464)
2067/14/09
4:37 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204)
2077/15/09
1:17 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906)
2087/15/09
1:22 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905)
2097/18/09
4:10 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01661)
2107/20/09
8:32 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (01403)
2117/20/09
10:45 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Russell Adler (02684-02685)
2127/21/09
8:21 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Leone (01352)
2137/22/09
11:22 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (01479)
2147/22/09
11:35 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05803)
2157/22/09
1:29 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01662)
2167/22/09Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions
2177/26/09
5:28 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863)
2187/28/09
8:59 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483)
2197/28/09
8:59 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03070)
2207/28/09
9:28 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486)
2217/28/09
10:00 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05848)
2227/29/09
1:13 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08420)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
2237/28/09
1:47 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (11075-11076)
2247/29/09
1:49 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (05852-05853)
2257/30/09
2:36 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536)
2267/30/09
2:36 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322)
2277/30/09
6:06 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539)
2287/31/09
11:20 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (11080-11082)
2297/31/09
3:40 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05087)
2308/2/09
1:15 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to William Berger (03694)
2318/10/09
5:44 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Jacquie
[REDACTED] (15113-15114)
2328/10/09
5:58 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Jacquie
[REDACTED] (00158)
2338/13/09
9:48 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley Edwards to Priscila Nascimento (08412)
2348/10/09
6:59 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965)
2358/10/09
7:23 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06967)
2368/11/09
8:43 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969)
2378/11/09
9:29 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards (06963-06964)
2388/11/09
10:10 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971)
2398/11/09
12:34 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06959-06960)
2408/14/09
4:40 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06975)
2418/15/09
2:41 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685)
2428/15/09
6:00 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973)
2438/17/09
10:32 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06976-06977)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
2448/17/09
10:42 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (02442)
2458/19/09
2:47 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501)
2468/24/09
7:38 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506)
2478/24/09
7:46 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113)
2488/24/09
9:50 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat (05112)
2498/25/09
11:03 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953)
2508/26/09
5:23 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Bradley [REDACTED] (01406)
2518/26/09
9:56 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to [REDACTED] (02269)
2528/31/09
10:58 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (02895)
2539/2/09
12:54 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie [REDACTED], Pat and Mike Fisten (01376)
2549/4/09
11:18 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell and William Berger (02043)
2559/7/09
1:39 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07612-07613)
2569/7/09
6:42 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (02595-02596)
2579/7/09
6:49 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Conchita [REDACTED] (07614-07615)
2589/7/09
7:00 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (07605-07606)
2599/7/09
8:12 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07607-07608)
2609/7/09
10:55 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07609-07611)
2619/8/09
11:43 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (04015)
2629/8/09
11:50 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07646)
2639/8/09
11:53 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07647)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
2649/8/09
12:04 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07676-07677)
2659/8/09
1:59 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07674-07675)
2669/8/09
2:04 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07678-07679)
2679/8/09
2:36 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07684-07685)
2689/8/09
2:42 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07682-07683)
2699/8/09
2:49 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07695-07697)
2709/8/09
3:25 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (07680-07681)
2719/8/09
7:51 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (07686-07688)
2729/8/09
7:53 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (07689-07691)
2739/8/09
7:53 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to Bradley J.
[REDACTED] (07692-07694)
2749/15/09
1:08 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to
Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED]
(01361)
2759/17/09
12:11 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to William
Berger (02088)
2769/18/09
12:35 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
Adler (01318)
2779/18/09
12:35 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED]
Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583)
2789/18/09
1:01 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan
Spencer Wendel (05619-05620)
2799/18/09
2:37 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Beth S.
Williamson (01144)
2809/18/09
2:55 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele
Dargan (01280-01288)
2819/21/09
1:37 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (03081)
2829/23/09
12:12 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul
Cassell (08459)
2839/23/09
8:42 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04320)
2849/24/09
6:31 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (04321)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
2859/24/09
6:53 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (04318-04319)
2869/24/09
8:45 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (10586-10589)
2879/28/09
8:09 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED], cc Renee/Carlos (02913)
2889/28/09
10:06 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to
[REDACTED] (06789)
2899/28/09
10:20 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06788)
2909/28/09
11:45 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita
[REDACTED] (19986-19987)
2919/29/09
10:06 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken
Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754)
29210/1/09
1:24 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08348-08349)
29310/1/09
1:30 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley
[REDACTED] (08355)
29410/2/09
10:41 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Nigel
Rosser (06191)
29510/2/09
11:08 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06189-06190)
29610/2/09
4:28 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (06979-06980)
29710/2/09
4:52 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Mike
Fisten (02440-02441)
29810/2/09
4:53 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael
Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974)
29910/2/09
6:14 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J.
Edwards, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956)
30010/6/09
11:14 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala
30110/8/09
4:11 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard
[REDACTED] (06961)
30210/13/09
2:17 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott
Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip
Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED]
(26507)
30310/13/09
2:27 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED] (01727)
30410/13/09
2:23 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J.
Discala, [REDACTED] Kretschmar and D. Von Allmen
(23299-23300)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
30510/13/09
2:37 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26827)
30610/13/09
4:02 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26094-26096)
30710/13/09
5:38 p.m.		E-mail chain – from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27277-27278)
30810/13/09
7:00 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED], cc Mike Fisten (01744)
30910/14/09
7:39 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190)
31010/14/09
9:02 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189)
31110/14/09
10:42 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099)
31210/14/09
12:20 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741)
31310/15/09
8:59 p.m.		E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, D. Von Allmen (26882)
31410/16/09
5:29 a.m.		E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865)
31510/16/09
11:00 a.m.		E-mail [REDACTED] from Michael Wheeler Mike Fisten, [REDACTED] Edwards and Pat [REDACTED] (01255)
31610/19/09
10:46 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Ken Jenne (01704)
31710/20/09
12:41 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303)
31810/20/09
1:01 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433)
31910/20/09
3:07 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506)
32010/22/09
11:17 a.m.		E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818)
32110/22/09
11:52 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391)
32210/22/09
1:48 p.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996)
32310/22/09
2:52 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. [REDACTED] and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
32410/22/09
4:10 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307)
32510/23/09
11:40 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477)
32610/23/09
12:17 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992)
32710/23/09
12:53 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335)
32810/26/09
7:46 a.m.		E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380)
32910/29/09
2:16 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01623)
33010/30/09
10:01 a.m.		E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305)
33110/30/09
10:03 a.m.		E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. Edwards (01625)
3323/17/10Wackenhut Incident Report
3333/18/10
1:20 a.m.		E-mail chain - from C.J. Schmidt to Tom Hartog and Donnie
3343/23/10Wackenhut Incident Report
3353/24/10
2:34 p.m.		E-mail chain - from Story Cowles to Tom Hartog
3364/1/10
3:50 a.m.		E-mail chain - from C.J. [REDACTED] to Story Cowles
33710/14/10Affidavit of Ken Jenne
Billing
33812/21/09Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000001-BJE0000000005)
339N/DSpreadsheet of Brad [REDACTED] Time in [REDACTED] adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156)
3407/14/10 -
1/16/13		Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103)
3411/1/80 –
2/15/13		Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
Miscellaneous
34210/23/09Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory
34312/1/09Criminal Complaint; United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308
3444/23/10Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]
3459/21/10Affidavit of [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]
34611/16/17Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr.
(https://www.lawclc.com/team\_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/)
34711/16/17[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED])
J. [REDACTED] - Presentations, Recognitions, Bios
348N/DThe National Crime Victim Bar Association presentation excerpt of article by Bradley J. [REDACTED]: Who is Responsible for Child Sexual Abuse
349N/DThe Florida Bar's website member profile printout for [REDACTED] James Edwards
350N/DNational Association of Distinguished Counsel biographical information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
3515/14/13The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 Directory (http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/top-40-under-40-directory/?last\_name+[REDACTED]=&state=FL&x=18&y=17)
3525/14/13The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad Edwards
(http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Brad\_[REDACTED]/4409/)
3535/14/13Lawyers.com website information for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (http://www.lawyers.com/florida/fort-lauderdale/[REDACTED]-J-[REDACTED]-3489098-a/)
35411/8/17The American Registry Website printouts of recognitions received by [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
35510/30/04Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED]
35610/30/05Kubicki Draper's website attorney information for Brad J. [REDACTED]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
Jaffe's Website
35711/9/17Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s "Our Attorneys" website printout (https://www.pathtojustice.com/about-us/attorneys/)
3585/7/12Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout (http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse\_Under\_Investigation)
3591/16/13Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout (http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse\_Under\_Investigation)
3601/16/13Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout (http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/press-releases/)
3615/14/13Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website printout (http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse\_Home)
3625/14/13Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout (http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse\_Under\_Notable\_Cases)
3635/14/13Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Edwards (www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-edwards#.UZJOPpWTOX0)
3645/14/13Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout (http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases#.UZJTy5WTOX0)
365Jaffe, Weissing, Jaffe, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad Jaffe with referenced articles
A.Winter 2014Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed;
B.12/26/15Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
C.12/21/15Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case
D.12/18/15Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit
E.12/21/15Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle
F.12/17/15Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle
G.11/25/15Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory
H.11/12/15Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK
I.7/8/15Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed
J.6/25/15WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash
K.6/24/15NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana Crash
L.6/24/15CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of Pregnant Woman Killed by Drunk Driver
M.6/25/15Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash
N.1/8/15Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal Legend Alan Dershowitz Over Sex Offender
O.4/21/14The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that Discovery Can Move Forward on My Crime Victims' Rights Act Case
P.4/21/14Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules Against Sex Offender. Attorneys for Underage Victims Seek to Overturn "Sweetheart Plea"
Q.4/21/14Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See Negotiation that Led to 'Lenient' Plea Deal Agreement for Billionaire Sex Offender
R.4/21/14Palm Beach Post. Appellate Ruling Could Force Feds to Reconsider Sex Changes Against Palm Beacher Epstein
S.10/20/13Palm Beach Daily News. Newest Lawsuit Against Epstein Expected to Include Victim Testimony
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
T.9/10/12CBS Miami, Exclusive: Sexual Assault Victim Alleges Abuse by Former Youth Pastor
U.9/7/12Sun-Sentinel. Elevator Fall Nets Woman \$13 Million Jury Award
V.July 2012Daily Business Review. Top Florida Verdicts & Settlements of 2011
W.6/13/12Daily Business Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush Strip Club of Scheme to Bilk Professionals
X.4/22/11Palm Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey Epstein Amends Lawsuit; Claims Victims' Attorney Threatened to Depose His Friends
3668/10/16[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with referenced articles
A.5/22/16Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein
B.5/13/16Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender's Jet Much More than Previously Known
C.2/11/16Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein
D.2/12/16NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein
E.2/11/16NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy'
F.4/23/14[REDACTED] Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case
G.4/23/14Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case
Pottinger's Website & Verdicts
3671/29/18[REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Brad
3681/29/18[REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts
J. [REDACTED] Lawsuits
369Misc.Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James [REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-[REDACTED]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
370Misc.Court and arrest information; [REDACTED] James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-[REDACTED]
3718/14/07Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72
3721/7/08Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption
373Misc.Docket; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
3741/21/10Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
3752/18/10[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
3768/11/10Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
3778/11/10Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
37810/22/10Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. Edwards; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
37911/2/10Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. Bradley J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE
380Misc.Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. Edwards; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
3813/17/10Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
38210/4/11Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
38310/10/11Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
3841/5/12Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
3851/18/12Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE
386Misc.Docket; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427
38712/8/11Complaint; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427
3881/25/12Stipulation for Settlement; 1st United Bank v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427
389Misc.Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
3903/22/12Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
3915/18/12[REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
39210/3/12Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
39310/26/12Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
39411/20/12Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
3953/15/13Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED]; 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE
396Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
3974/16/07Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC
3981/25/082008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates
3993/11/092009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates
400Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21
4013/3/08Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al.; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1)
4026/17/08Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al.; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79)
4038/10/10U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al.; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602
40412/9/04New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape
Experts
40510/20/17Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments
406Misc.All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report
4079/9/16Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in Virginia [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY)
40811/30/16Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY)
Other Articles
40911/1/09Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein
41011/2/09Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme
41111/2/09New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
41211/3/09The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations
41311/3/09Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says
41411/3/09Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved
41511/3/09Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True
41611/5/09Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe
41711/6/09New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy
41811/6/09Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam
41911/7/09Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who
42011/12/09Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone
42111/13/09Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show'
42211/13/09Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein
42311/17/09Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I
42411/17/09Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License
42511/17/09Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike?
42611/18/09Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part III
42711/18/09Former RRA Attorneys Take New Jobs
42811/20/09Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al.
42911/20/09Article by Paul Brinkman
43011/21/09Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past
43111/22/09George Levin was Rothstein's Whale
43211/23/09Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops
43311/23/09Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer
43411/23/09Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves
43511/24/09Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm
43611/26/09The Rothstein Wires
4371/13/10Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
438July 2010Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys
43910/22/10South Florida Business Journal. A Year After
44010/31/10The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One
44111/1/10The Florida Bar Daily News Summary
4421/21/13Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and
44310/13/14Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates
44410/3/17Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three
L.M. and E.W. — Public ec)
4456/28/04Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office O
446N/DDemons Cycle Photographs depi and/or
L. P cltecords
447License Details - L. • 1 ialist
4482/6/03Palm Beach Coun e Office Offense
4496/29/03Palm Beach • unty rift's Office Offense
Re rt No. 03
4501/5/04Anna T v. Scott 15th Judicial Circuit,
Palm B unty Case No. 2004 DR 001691
e t Violence
4512/8/04m Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
452alm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4537/6/In re L.M., 151° Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach
4547/18/04Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
45510/4/07Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
4561/8/08Justin Sprague v. L.M., 20th Judicial Circuit, Lee County Case No. 08-DR-003141 - Petition to Determine Paternity
4572/26/09Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-044965
4584/17/09Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 09-067050
4592010Twitter Account – L.M.
4604/16/10Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Report No. 06-10-1058307
4611/14/12Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 12-025901
4622/10/12Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; West Palm Beach Police Department, Report No. 94-12-2384
4631/6/13Arrest / Notice to Appear Report and Probable Cause Affidavit – Greenacres Dept. of Public Safety, Report No. 42-13-00742
4647/23/13Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 13-100174
46512/7/14Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense Report No. 14-152173
46611/5/15Lexine Turney v. L.M., 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Case No. 50-2015-DR-010853 - Petition for Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence

E.W. — Public Records

4671/23/18• t rough County Property Appraiser
o ation; Parcel Folio 088078-3334
4689/20 +3 qb - ial Warranty Deed from Homes by West Bay,
4697/14 General Warranty Deed from E.W. to Michael C.
470Hillsborough County Property Appraiser
4712/24/15Warranty Deed from William C. Moody and
4721/15/18Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
4738/2/02Boynton Beach Police Department Incident Report
4745/15/03Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4755/15/03Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4765/20/03Eva v. James R. Gebbia, 15th Judicial Circuit,
4777/20/03Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4788/1/03Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report No. 03-096606 14/ )
4798/5/03Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4808/5/03West Palm Beach Police Department R
4818/28/03West Palm Beach Police D t e o.
4825/22/04Palm Beach County Sheriff c ffense
Report Case No. 04-07060 a La e Worth Police
D artment Informati eet ase No. 04-20500
4833/31/06Palm Beach Coun e ffice Offense
Re rt No. 06
48411/9/06Palm Beach unty nff's Office Offense
Report Case 0. 33067
48512/6/06Arrest / tice to Appear and Probable Cause
Affidavit ton Beach Police Department
4866/9/07; o on Beach Police Department Incident Report
d 8375
4876/15 4est / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
ffidavit; -07P.6al0m31Beach 78 Police Department
4886 /15/Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
4899/4/07Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
4905/30/09Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
4919/5/09Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; North Palm Beach Public Safety Report No. 70-09-009903
4924/4/10Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Report No. 78-10-001780
4935/8/12Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Palm Springs Public Safety Report No. 82-2012-10813
4945/12/12Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Delray Beach Police Department Report No. 40-12-006170
4955/13/12Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause Affidavit; Delray Beach Police Department Report No. 40-12-006187
49612/31/12State of Florida v. E.W., 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 – Information, Case File Sheet
4971/8/14State of Florida v. E.W., 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami Dade County Case No. F12-29832 - Judgment
4986/21/13Florida DUI Uniform Traffic Citation, Pinellas County, Officer Worksheet and Complaint/Arrest Affidavit
49911/20/15State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County Case No. 2015-CF-016193; Information
5004/4/16Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear Report No. 16-190831; Case No. 16-4733
5014/4/16Criminal Report Affidavit / Notice to Appear Report No. 16-190881
50212/5/16State of Florida v. E.W., 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County Case No. 2016-CF-004732000AHC – Plea, Sentencing, Judgment
Jane Doe - Public Records
503Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Property Records for Parcel Control No. 00-40-43-10-00-000-5310 and photographs
50411/1/10General Warranty Deed from Glenn R. [REDACTED] to Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane Doe
5053/12/14Warranty Deed from Jamie Neil Capalbo and Jane Doe to 7696 Oakboro Dr., LLC
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
5061/18/18Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal
5077/12/00Arrest Affidavit; Dial
50810/5/00State of Florida v. Tammy Huff 1911' Judicial
Circuit, County - Deagtion of Jane Doe
5092/7/02State of Florida v. Tammy= Huff 10 Judicial
Circuit, County Case No, 00-875-CFA —
5107/23/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
5118/27/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
Report No. 02-108484 OP'
5129/10/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
5139/17/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offe
5149/18/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Ode
51510/3/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's e ense
5165/9/03State of Florida v. Bra Dia 9'h Judicial
Circuit, Cou o. 00-375 —
5179/19/03Palm Beach C QRty ills Office Offense
5189/24/03Palm Beach Co Sheriff's Office Offense
Report 16298
5199/29/03Pa BeaCounty
52012/1/03es 1m Beach Police Department Report No.
5211/6est Palm Beach Police Department Report No.
522ionPalm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
52312/2/04Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
5241/9/05Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
5252/23/05Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
No.DateDescription Objection Marked
52612/26/06Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause
5274/28/07Arrest / Notice to Appear, Probable Cause
5289/12/10Arrest / Notice to Appear; Delray Beach Police
52912/9/10Arrest / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
5302/2/11Arrest /Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
53111/4/97Palm Beach Police Departmen
5321/29/98Palm Beach County Sheriff's O c ffense
5332/3/98Palm Beach County Sheri s c Offense
5342/28/98Palm Beach Coun e ffice Offense
535N/DIn re Daniel hens , 15 Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County o. 50-2000-GA-000718 -
5366/10/01Pa ch Police Department Offense
R rt C No. 01-002214
5378/3/01o Palm Beach Police Department Offense
5383/2/est / Notice to Appear and Probable Cause
R rt No. 42-02-14029
539M.State ofFlorida v. 15 Judicial
5406/2/02Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Offense
J. and Paul Cassell v. Dershowitz
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
No.DateDescriptionObjectionMarked in EvidenceMarked for Id.
5411/6/15Complaint
5424/8/16Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
5434/8/16Article – Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer Dershowitz end in settlement
General
544All public records and news articles relating to Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, ██████ J. ██████ or any witnesses listed by either party
545All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery and any documents filed in the court file, including pleadings, motions, responses, affidavits, discovery, and exhibits, in all matters identified herein
546All documents produced by any party or non-party in this matter
547All prior testimony, statements, reports and affidavits of any witness or experts
548All charts/analyses prepared based on documents exchanged or later discovered
549All foundation exhibits
550All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits
551Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not limited to, charts, timelines, diagrams, models, surveys, photographs and blow-ups
552All newly discovered documents/exhibits
553Any and all exhibits listed by ██████ J. ██████ (by identifying these as exhibits, Epstein is not waiving his right to object to any of ██████ exhibits introduced at trial)

Counter-Defendant reserves his right to supplement this Exhibit List.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)

Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)

Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com

Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com

Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com

Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+
+

J. [REDACTED]
+ J. [REDACTED]
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University Street
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counse

EXHIBIT N

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

VIA HAND DELIVERY

Jack Scarola David P. Vitale, Jr. Seamy, Denney, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409

RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and lit t;I a : 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-209 040800XXXXMBAG

October 5, 2018

Dear Jack and David:

I am enclosing a flash drive containing % exhibits identified on Epstein's October 5, 2018, Trial Exhibit List. While the documents have been provided to you previously under different exhibit numbers, we are providing them to you again to correspond with our new list.

If you have any questions, please let us know.

rely,

Scott J. Link

SJL/t1c Enclosure 20/13099

EXHIBIT O

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

VS.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,

individually, and L.M.,

individually,

Defendants,

COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, LEY J. SECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST

COMES NOW the Counter- RADLEY J. and hereby files his Amended Exhibit List as follows:

BJE

  • O. No objection 5. Privileged
  • 1. All objections 6. Opinion
  • 2. All objec ea pt authenticity 7. Hearsay
  • 3. Irrelev aterial 8. Authenticity lacking
  • 4. Probafl ie value substantially 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.

Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Counter-Plaintiff's, J. Second Amended Exhibit List

Counter-PlaintiffMarked Marked for
No.Description of Exhibit Objection in Evidence Identification
I .All applicable criminal statutes.
2.All applicable Florida Statutes.
3.Photos and information of Jeffrey Epstein's homes,
tat ic
4.Order confirmation from Amazon.com for purchase
5.Non-Prosecution Agreement.
6.Jane Doe 102 Complaint
7.Messages taken from m ound at Epstein's
8.Documents Mat ez Epstein produced
9.Jeffrey Ep T ' 's orflight logs.
10.Je Epst 's phone records.
11.phone records.
1visitation Logs.
14.All probable cause affidavits related to criminal
15.Victims' statements to the FBI related to criminal
16.Video of Epstein Property Inspection,
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.home. Complaint Jane Doe v. Epstein and all subsequent Amended Complaints. All records of homes, properties, bank accounts and any/ all records related to Jeffrey Epstein's ACIA assets. Jeffrey Epstein's passport (or copy). CO .' Jeffrey Epstein's driver's license (or copy). List of corporations owned by Jeffrey Epst • c Yearbooks of Jane Doe. 2002 Palm Beach High Sc ht '\ook. 2001 Palm Beach Hi Near Book. 2003 Palm Beach G chool Year Book. Affidavit and A or Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epste 's h e (from Palm Beach State Attorney's , hibit #29). Note s found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or d trash pulls outside of his home during - . in vestigation.
29.1 aim Beach State Attorney's Criminal file ainst Jeffrey Epstein.
30.All documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's 6/30/08 conviction.
31.Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea colloquy.
32.List of properties and vehicles in Larry Visoski's name.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
33.All of Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Production, Requests for Admission, Answers to Interrogatories in this matter, and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
34.All discovery related responses of Jeffrey Epstein in this matter and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
35.Jeffrey Epstein's Answers and Affirmative Defenses in all civil cases against him.
36.All Complaints in which Jeffrey Epstein is/was a defendant.
37.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in this case and in cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
38.Jeffrey Epstein's Deposition testimony and discovery responses in State Court cases LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXIMB AB and E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CP003626XXXXMB.
39.Jeffrey Epstein Deposition Testimony and discovery responses in State Court case Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, et al. Case No 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG.
40.Any and all newspaper articles, online articles or publications related to Jeffrey Epstein.
41.Report and Analysis of Jeffrey Epstein's assets.
42.Video footage (DVD) of walk through site
43.Photos of all of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, cars, boats
44.Probable Cause Affidavits re against
45.Documents related to or evidencing Jeffrey
CO 'S
47.Expert Dr. L. Dennison Report is
48.Palm Beach Police Department 1nr Report dated
49.All reports and documen 4 ge ted by Palm
Beach Police Dep t i • i-. to Jeffrey Epstein.
50.All Witness Stat ended by Palm
Beach Police t relating to Jeffrey
51.Passenger ests of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft
andNeate ane flight logs.
P ger lists for flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein.
54.Jeffrey Epstein's bank statements.
55.Jeffrey Epstein's tax returns.
56.MC2 emails involving communications of

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plainbffs, I Second Amended Exhibit List

Pappas Suat, Jean Luc Brunel and Amanda Grant
57.DVD of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08.
58.Transcript of plea and colloquy taken on 6-30-08.
59.Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated
07/25/06 (unredacted) 41,4"
60.No Contact Orders entered against Jeffrey Epstein.
(:) Y
61.Criminal Score Sheet regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
62.Documents evidencing Jeffrey Epstein's Co Control and Probation.
63.Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Offender Regi ihs ., m various states).
64.Jeffrey Epstein's Booking pht
65.CAD calls to 358 EL B
PALM BEACH FL O.
66.List of Jeffrey Et use contacts.
67.Documen dated to Jeffrey Epstein's investments.
68.Lette m 'ef Michael Reiter to Barry Krischler.
69.B h Police Department Incident Report dated 06 (redacted)D tter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/11/06.
71.Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney, 01/13/06.

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Stott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J EM, Second Amended Exhibit List

72.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
73.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
74.Letter from Guy Fronstin to
04/10/06. CO S
75.Letter from Goldberger, 06/22/06.
76.All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury. c
77.Documents related to the rental of a ye anessa
78.Ted's Sheds Documents.
Documents related to pro of
80.Arrest Warrant o en.
81.Police report reg picking
up money d -28-04.
82.Trila ral Commission Members of 2003.
83.i rshowitz Letter dated 04/19/06 and Statute
84.Guy Fronstin letter dated 04/17/06.
85.Jeffrey Epstein Account Information.
86.Jeffrey Epstein Criminal Closeout Sheet.
87.JEGE, Inc. Passenger Manifest.
88.Hyperion Air Passenger Manifest.
89.Flight information for
90.Passenger List Palm Beach flights 2005.
91.Jeffrey Epstein notepad notes, re: Maria.
92.Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case.
404 A
93.Jeffrey Epstein 5t^ Amendment Speech.
94.Reiter IC:4).( letter to Krisher, 05/01/06.
95.Police Report, 11/28/04.
96.Victim's school records and transcripts. \
97.Victim Notification letter to Virgi % a re , 09/03/08
98.Police report of Juan Alessi e t J y Epstein's
99.Victim's Medical R Dr. Randee Speciale.
100.All surveillance ondu t d by law
enforcement on Epstein's home.
101.Emails re c rom Palm Beach Records
rel to Je y Epstein.
\A
et em listed on the Palm Beach Police Property
Mil Lists and/or Property Receipts.
\II copies of convictions related to Jeffrey Epstein.
104.Jeffrey Epstein criminal records.
105.All documents produced by Palm Beach Police
106.Statements, deposition transcripts, videotaped
107.Any and all expert witness reports and/or records
party to this cause. AeAsk
108.Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not
109.reserves all objections to Epstein'
110.reserves the right to supplem
III.By listing an Exhibit, Edward no ving
his right to object to same at a oes not
waive their right to ame e.
112.All exhibits listed subject to
113.All pleadi and a chments in the action
under the ictims Rights Act prosecuted
by B ley wards on behalf of victims of
E 's criminal molestations.
Ed s' Motions for Summary Judgment, all
115.All time records and hourly billing
116.All deposition testimony and discovery responses
117.All pleadings filed by Epstein in the
118.All submissions by Epstein in connection with
119.All Settlement Agreements between Epstein
and victims of his sexual molestations. Aek"
120.Phone Journal taken from Epstein's home and produced
121.Photo depicting Ohislaine Maxwell
122.All flight logs for any Jeffrey Epstein o
123.All emails produced by Defendant\ all emails
124.Evidence of contributio e Paam Beach Police
125.Dr. Bernard J. J Report, Attachments and
Back-up Docum ts, ctober 20, 2017.
126.Jeffrey Eps Scott Rothstein, J.
and ., C paint, December 7, 2009.
127.t. y ein vs. Scott Rothstein, J.
and . Fourth Amended Counterclaim, January 9,
128.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J.
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Fourth
129.Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J.
130.Brad Edward's Times Records and Billing Records
131.Epstein's NY State Online Sex Offender
132.New York Post article: Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: l'
133.Medical Records: New York Presbyterian Ho
134.Hand Drawing of Bart Simpson (sign
135.Proposed Joint Letter to the S ml r.
136.Front and Back of Hard Col Photo Virginia
137.Color photo of V im its on ferry "New York".
138.Scenic photo of Tii Square.
139.Virgi "tt Ro crt photo on back of ship.
140.room in New York.
141.photo of man on horse (New Mexico Ranch).
142.Color photo of at Zorro Ranch
143.photo on horse front of ranch.
144.photo standing against rocks (red
145.standing against rocks (red coat) (far)
(with back photo back date).
146.photo riding horse blue jacket far.
147.photo on side of horse hand up.
148.photo on side of horse. 4: rnic
149.photo
on rail. On
151.photo standing outside next to
152.photo standing in front o
153.W photo with hand ov
154.photo scan piano.
155.photo• fireplace (museum).
156.font of wagon in museum.
157.Color photo of in front of museum
exhibition ( Fe, New Mexico).
158.Pho ph pain Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislthne
159. +• •a (Australia Storage): Photo Book 2.
160.Cover photo book 2.
161.Scenic photo (with back photo ).
162.Scenic photo (with back photo IM).
163.Scenic photo (with back photo ).
164.Scenic photo (with back photoIn).
165.steps with trees overhead.
166.Scenic photo (with back photoM.
167.Scenic photo (with back photoM.
168.Scenic photo (with back photoMI. OA
169.Scenic photo (with back photoM). C)
170.Scenic photo (with back photoand black).
171.Scenic photo (with back photoand blac .
4) 4c)
Scenic photo (with back photoan
173.on steps with chi ck photo
174.on street (far) (with back
photoand black).
175.Travel envelope. (14/ S?
176.Sin are Airlinekaw4e1 Cover with handwritten notes
177.hai HotReceipts.
178.oket for Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein.
179List of Victims/ Co-Conspirators unique to the
180.Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, 04/22/16
181.FBI Form 302 - Interview ofin
182.Mark Epstein Deposition.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
183.March 19, 2008, email of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann [REDACTED] Villafana (Summary of the Case) (Coonan File).
184.Color photos of Ghislaine Maxwell, one with Jeffrey Epstein.
185.Airport Codes (Demonstrative).
186.March 3, 2011 - New York Post: Uppity Tranny to Epstein: Pay Up!
187.DVD of Epstein PBPD 358 El Brillo Search Warrant Walk Through 05/11/09; DVD Audio from Cassettes, Part 1.
188.[REDACTED] Redacted Transcript taken by Detective Joe Recarey and Detective Dawson (with Exhibits) 10/11/05.
189.Palm Beach Police Investigation: Palm Beach PD Records; Wachovia Bank Account.
190.Folder titled Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Summary by Detective Recarey: Enclosing phone records. SAO FOIA Disc 7 (State Files).
191.Folder titled Sara Kellen Cell: Sara [REDACTED] Cell Phone Usage 09/2005-10/2005.
192.Folder titled Sara [REDACTED]: AT&T February 12, 2005 Statement.
193.Demand Deposit Account Statement History for Household Bank Account Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell or Alfredo Rodriguez.
194.Santa Monica Police Report (May 12, 1997).
195.Folder titled PLANES: Information relating to Epstein's planes/aircrafts collected by the State Attorney's Office unique to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
196.Palm Beach House/Information Sheet.
197.Sworn Statement of Juan Alessi taken by Palm Beach
198.Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol. I) 09/08/09.
199.Juan Alessi Deposition (Vol II) 09/08/09. 4'
200.Brochure for Boeing Super 727-100. O
201.Passport application; issued January 12, 2001.
202.Sentencing Transcript, Alfredo Rodriguez.
203.Criminal Complaint — Alfredo Rodriguez.
204.Plea Agreement — Alfredo Rodrigu \,,
205.Photos of Jeffrey Epstein's pro ' lanes.
206.Photos of Jeffrey Epstein y d former
207.Jeffrey Epstein G • uments.
208.Palm Beach Coun e Attorney's Response to Public
Records Re including audio recordings).
209.Any all nses to Subpoenas Duces Tecum with
or th eposition.
210.I rrogatories and Answers thereto, Requests to
211.Any and all documents produced in this action.
212.Any and all depositions taken in this action.
213.Any documents or other exhibit attached to or used

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M..
+ Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
+ Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
214.Any and all exhibits, documents, etc. referred to in any deposition.
215.Any and all documents and exhibits designated by all parties to this action.
216.Any and all exhibits needed for impeachment or rebuttal.
217.Any and all pleadings filed in this action.
218.Any and all records produced or that will be produced by all records custodians relative to this action.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of December, 2017.

Jack Scarola
+ Florida Bar No.: 169440
+ Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and
+ mep@searcylaw.com
+ Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+ Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
+ Phone: (561) 686-6300
+ Fax: (561) 383-9451
+ Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M..
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Counter-Plaintiff's, [REDACTED] J [REDACTED], Second Amended Exhibit List

COUNSEL LIST

Jack Scarola, Esquire
scarolateam@searcylaw.com;
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Scott J. Link, Esq.
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: 561-727-3600
Fax: 561-727-3601
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-655-4777
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M.. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Counter-Plaintiff's, J , Second Amended Exhibit List

J. , Esquire staffefile@pathtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Alk "

,1O

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 C O efiling®tonjahaddad.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716

iS 5)

Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein c

?S'

EXHIBIT P

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, And L.M., individually,

Defendants.

A

a'\* \* s\* \* \*

HEARING BEFORE: HONORABLE de

DATE TAKEN: July 20

TIME: . to 4:45 p.m.

Peach County Courthouse Dixie Highway, Room 9C PLACE: est Palm Beach, Florida 33401

REPORTED XB : C Kathleen M. Ames, RPR

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

attorney-client privilege. Unlike the Fifth Amendment privilege, which is controlled by Mr. Epstein, as much as we might like to take all of this and put it on the floor in this courtroom for Your Honor and everybody else in the world to take a look at because we have nothing to hide, we can't do that.

THE COURT: I understand that.

MR. SCAROLA: Okay. So we're oblig our privilege. Assert

THE COURT: It's not your p

`` MR. SCAROLA: We are ob assert the \ 4Cli 'l privilege on behalf of our cl' . Not only on behalf of the clients who we repres d talSose claims were settled but also because that formation is relevant and material to ongoi s against Mr. Epstein, we must protect the obligatio we have to protect the interests of those other en That's the position that we are in. Now, befo ever get to questions about privilege and an obi). ation to prepare a privilege log, and an in camera inspection, the threshold issue is relevance. And it was as a consequence of Your Honor's recognition of the fact that there was a threshold relevance issue that Your Honor stayed enforcement of any subpoena or production request in this Court until such time as the pleadings were clarified work-p::: uct privilege, as well, because of the

//

EXHIBIT Q

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

COUNTER-DEFENDANT 4 PSTEIN'S TRIAL WIT L

ant Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, this Court's August 3, 2018, Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and the trial of this matter: ures, identifies the witnesses he may call at

Co SIA

  • 1. J. Edw do Edw nger LLC 425 An Avenue, Suite 2 ale, FL 33301-3268
  • 2. W. Rothstein +11 arc Nurik w Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (by video deposition)
  • 3. %Ackerman, Jr. do Burnett 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100 West Palm Beach, FL 33401

  • 4. William J. Berger do Greenspoon Marder 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 11800 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
  • 5. Wayne Black do Wayne Black & Associates One Brickell Square 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33131
  • 6. Paul G. Cassell do Hatch, James & Dodge, P.C. 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84101
  • 7. Robert D. Critton, Jr. do Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
  • 8. Pasquale do Pat IM & Associates, Inc. "S"S"" ) 2893 Executive Park Drive, Weston, FL 33331
  • 9. Abraxas (A.J.) Di Address Unknot
  • 10. Jane Doe c/o Edwar nger LLC 425 An Avenue, Suite 2 ale, FL 33301-3268
  • 11. Q rine W. Ezell S.W. 711Place iami, FL 33155-5605
  • 12. Gary M. 1 . Jr. do Gary M. , Jr., P.A. 4420 N.E. 24 Avenue Lighthouse Point, FL 33064-7209

  • 13. Michael Fisten do Blue Line Investigative Solutions 3389 Sheridan Street, Suite 515 Hollywood, FL 33021
  • 14. Allan M. Garten 28183 S. Barlow Road Aurora, OR 97002-9321 15751 Sheridan St., #129 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33331-3486 ,1OAlk"
  • 15. Cam L. 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 do Horowitz Law CO N
  • 16. Adam D. Horowitz Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
  • 17. Kenneth C. Jenne Address Unknown
  • 18. Amy Josefsberg-Ederi do Miami-Dade State AttomtSt 1350 N.W. It Avenue Miami, FL 33136-2102 ' N
  • 19. Robert C. Josefs do Podhurst O SunTrust Intern Center One S.E. Third A e, Suite 2700 Miami, F -1715
  • 20. hmar g Eagle Investments, LLC N.E. 351h Court uderdale, FL 33308
  • 21) Seth M. Lehrman do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
  • 22. Michael Legamaro do Legamaro Banipal LLP 123 Wacker Drive, Suite 1400 Chicago, IL 60606

G C

  • 23. Levin Address Unknown
  • 24. Charles H. Lichtman do Berger Singennan LLP 350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-4215
  • 25. Mark T. Luttier do Clifton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
  • 26. L.M. do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
  • 27. Stuart S. Mermelstein do Herman Law Firm, P.A. 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 5 Boca Raton, FL 33486-1018( s .,
  • 28. Priscilla Nascimento Address Unknown
  • 29. Marc S. Nurik do Law Offices f M S. Nurik One E. Broward evard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauder EL 33301 e Lustig, LLP ercer Avenue, Suite 204 Palm Beach, FL 33401-7449
  • 31. Prey& Address Unknown
  • 32. Thane Ritchie do Ritchie Capital Management Address Unknown

  • 33. do Blue Line Investigative Solutions 3389 Sheridan Street, Suite 515 Hollywood, FL 33021
  • 34. David Rogers 7318 Easton Drive Lake Worth, FL 33167
  • 35. Alan do Pinte Development Company 1135 Kane Concourse, Floor 3 4OAlk
    • B. Sakowitz Pointe Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025
  • 36. Jack Scarola 0 . do Seamy Denney Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409
  • 37. William R. Scherer do Conrad & Scherer, LLP A 633 S. Federal Highway, Suite 8 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ( s 1:1S). ,
  • 38. Jack Simony do Platinum Partners New York, NY
  • 39. Barry J. 6615 E. Liseron Boynton
  • 41. Visoski 131 Pine Point Road Riviera Beach, FL 33404 33437-6481
  • 42. E.W. do Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268

  • 43. Beth Williamson 150 N.E. 15th Avenue, #354 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
  • 44. Richard H. Willits do Richard H. Willits P.A. 490 Wandering Way Ponte Vedra, FL 32081-0619
  • 45. Ronald Wise A4Iptik" Address Unknown
  • 46. Phaedra Xanthos, CPA, CFE 3762 Riverland Road Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 0 .'
  • 47. Anrslall witnesses listed by J. Edw deffding on their testimony in case in chief.
  • 48. Any and all witnesses whose names, depositions, interro tones or documents produced in response to production provided by J. depending on the testim d aids' case in chief.

  • 49. D. Culver Skip) Smi Culver III, P 500 South Aust Vi e, Suite 600 West Palm Bea 401 Telephone: 598-

will testify as to legal ethics and responsibility, probable and p fessional reputation.

Su tance of the Facts and Opinions: The pleadings and information that was A÷ able before the original civil proceeding was initiated and discovered during he pendency of the original civil proceeding and deposition testimony.

Summary of Grounds for Each Opinion: Mr. has not reached his final opinions.

Curricula Vitae: A copy of Mr. Curricula Vitae is attached as Exhibit A.

Epstein reserves the right to list and/or call any and all newly discovered witnesses upon proper notice and to call and/or produce any and all additional witnesses necessary for

impeachment or rebuttal. Epstein reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this Witness List upon proper notice to the parties and the Court.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link

Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey
Ep [REDACTED]

SERVICE LIST

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

J. [REDACTED]
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University Street
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jay@jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+

D. Culver HI CURRICULUM VITAE

CULVER III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 600 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 wmi.culversmithlaw.com

ofc 561.598.6800 fax 561.598.6801 cell 561.301.3800 csmithCcuNersmithlaw.cOm

OCCUPATION/PROFESSION

Lawyer and consultant

Practice emphasis: Counseling and representation of lawyers, law firms, and others on ethics, professional responsibility, professional disciplinary proceedings, sanctions, disqualification, unlicensed practice of law, malpractice, and loss prevention; service as expert witness in litigation involving such matters; conduct of ethics audits for law firms; thunseling and representation of applicants for admission or reinstatement to the6ar; counseling and representation of public officials and employees on ethics compliance i arid complaints; conduct of internal corporate investigations; service as special magistrate, Aftlator, and mediator; representation and consultation on appeals in all courts. More than forty-five years of experience in the field, as well as experience in law-firm anagement.

EXPERIENCE

Counsel for respondents in hundreds of lawyeatIpli ry, unlicensed-practice-of-law, and baradmission proceedings, including appeals in the Supreme Court of Florida

Representation in dozens of disqualifi sanctions proceedings

Testifying/consuIting expert in nu s cases involving lawyer ethics and professionalresponsibility issues

Wide variety of civil litigation And appeals, including matters involving contracts, business torts, professional responsibility and malpractice, corporate and partnership relationships, officer and director liability, and, trust and estate disputes.

EDUCATION AND IJCENSING

Bachelor of Arts,IWashington and Lee University, 1964

Doctorof Jurisprudence, Washington and Lee University College of Law, 1969 (replaced LLB. conferred 1967)

Admitted to practice in:

Florida, 1967

California, 1972 (now inactive)

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Law Clerk to Judge T. Shannon, Jr., and Judge Robert T. =, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, 1967-1968 (summarized briefs and records-on-appeal, researched law, drafted opinions) Associate, M, =, Paine & =, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1968 (associate in midsize law firm for four months before commencing active military duty; researched law, drafted pleadings and briefs, conducted depositions, and handled motion hearings) Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Naval Reserve, 1968-1972 (active duty as military lawyer: two years at Naval Law Center, San Diego, CA, prosecuting and defending courts-martial cases; two years as staff judge advocate at Naval Air Station Miramar ("Ffghtertown U.S.A."), San Diego, CA, advising commanding officer on wide variety of military and Civilian legal matters) Associate, John W. Dell, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1972-1974 (associate In small, general-practice law firm; handled various litigation and nonlitigation matters) Shareholder, Dell and =, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1974-1977(shareholder in small, generalpractice law firm; handled various litigation matters, i 10 intuirsonal-injury and commercial cases) Shareholder, =, Coogler, &=, P.A.,SVASPalm Beach, 1977-1981 (shareholder in small-to-midsize insurance-defense firm; handled defense of personal-injury, product-liability, and professional-malpractice cases) Partner, Steel Hector & LLP, West Palm Beach, 1981-1991 (senior litigator in large, Miamibased law firm's West Palm Beach office; Oaired office litigation department; recruited, trained, and supervised litigation associates and legal assistants; handled wide variety of complex civil business litigation, professional-malpractice cases, and probate litigation) Shareholder, M, Jo sto &Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, 1992-1997 (shareholder in midsize general-practice la m; handled wide variety of civil business litigation and probate litigation) Partner, Holland & Knigh LLP, West Palm Beach, 1997-2002 (senior litigator in international law firm's West Palm Beach office; handled wide variety of civil business litigation, probate litigation, and appeals; served as office Executive Partner, 1998-2002) Sharehoyer; Ill, P.A., West Palm Beach, 2002-2007 trial and appellate practice; substhttial focus on lawyer ethics and professional responsibility) Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm Beach, 2007-2010 (senior litigator in national law firm's West Palm Beach office) Shareholder, Culver P.A., West Palm Beach, 2010—date =legal and consulting practice; substantial focus on ethics, professional responsibility, and related matters; appellate representation and consultation)

PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE

The Florida Bar:

Member, Board of Governors, 1984-1988 (Executive Committee, 1987-1988)

Member, Professional Ethics Committee, 2001-2007,2010-2016 (Chairperson, 2004-2005, 2006-2007) I, ii

Member, Vision 2016 Commission, 2013-2016 (Chairperson, MJP/Reciprocity- ale- us Committee, Bar Admissions Subgroup, 2013-2016)

Member, Standing Committee on Professionalism, 1989-1993, 2016—d e airperson, 1989-1992)

Member, Hawkins Commission on Discipline System, 2011-2012

Member, Special Committee to Review 2002 ABA Model RyFEs, 02-2006

Member, Ethics 2000 Review Panel, 2001

Member, Law-Related Education Committee, 2007 \ 0

Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1987-1,989, 992-2001 (Chairperson, 1988-1989, 1993-1994) (author/editor of Meeting, the Challenges: A Strategic Plan for the Florida Bar, 1993)

Member, Special Committee to Study Composition of Board of Governors, 1996-1997

Vice Chairperson, Commission on Lawyer Professionalism, 1987-1989 (principal author of Florida Bar Ideals and Goals of Professionalism and Florida Lawyer's Creed of , Professionalism (adopted 1990, superseded 2015))

Chairperson, Special Committee on Priorities for the 1990s, 1986-1987

Member, Special Cormyrittee to Study Reapportionment of the Board of Governors, 1986-1987 (author of The Florida Bar's answer and counterpetition in Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Reapportionment), 518 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1987) (adopting Flo • a roposed plan for apportionment of Board of Governors))

M , Pr gram Evaluation Committee, 1984-1988 (Chairperson, 1986-1988)

O714/ i . son, Special Study Committee on Lawyer Referral Services, 1985-1986

Member, Special Study Committee on Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 1983-1984

Member, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee, 1977-1980 (Chairperson, 1979-1980)

Member, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, 1974-1979

Member, Trial Lawyers Section and Appellate Practice Section

Palm Beach County Bar Association:

President, 1982-1983

President-Elect, 1981-1982

Secretary, 1979-1981

Member, Board of Directors, 1977-1984

President, Young Lawyers Section, 1976-1977

Member, Professionalism Committee, 1990-1991, 2004—date (Co-Chair n, 2 —2012)

Member, & Small Firm Practitioners Committee, 2011-2012

Member, Judicial Campaign Practices Commission, 2002,2004" 2012,2014, 2016

Member, Historical Committee, 2003-2009 (Chairperso 3—`1905, 2006-2009)

Member, Historic Courtroom Fundraising Committee( 08

Member, Long Range Planning Committee, 1994-1996; r 1-2002

Member, Revitalization of the Bar Committee, 1909-2000

Chairperson, Bulletin Editorial Committee 1 —1997

Chairperson, Circuit Court Civil Pracrf Com ittee, 1979

Chairperson, New Member Oricctron Committee, 1976-1977

Chairperson, Membership Caro>nittee, 1974-1976

\/

American College of Trial Law}rers:\_,/

Fellow, 1996-date

Membernlorida State Committee, 2004-2009

Member, Legal Ethics and Professionalism Committee (f/k/a Legal Ethics Committee), 1997- 2002,2005-2013

Chairperson, 2008 Tri-State Meeting Committee, 2006-2008

Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers:

Member, 2005—date

Member, Program Committee, 2006, 2008-2010, 2014—date (Chairperson, 2008-2010)

Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers:

Charter member, 2009—date (member, Board of Directors, 2009—date)

American Bar Association:

Member, Center for Professional Responsibility

Member, Section of Litigation

The Florida Bar Foundation:

Member, Board of Directors, 1988-1992 (Executive Committee, 1990-1

Member, Development Committee, 1995-1996,2000-2005

Member, Improvements in the Administration of Justice IOTA GrantCComrhittee, 1992-1994, 1995-1997

Chairperson, Investment Committee, 1991-1992

Vice Chairperson, Law Student Assistance IOTA Grant Committee, 1990-1992

Member, Legal Assistance for the Poor IOTA Grant CoMmittee, 1988-1991

Chairperson, 2004 Palm Beach County Fellows Campaign

Member, Steering Committee, 2010 Palm Beath County Fellows Campaign

Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th A sarXmmittee, Inc.

Member, Board of DirectojC2Q1 016

Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc.

Member, Board of Directors, 2016—date /

/ Member, Florida Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Committee, 1992-1996 (Chairperson, 1994— 1995) ,

4 Chairpefso (, Ad "i Hoc Magistrate Selection Panel, United States District Court, Southern District of leftfe1987

Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Media Committee, 2005-2009

Member, Florida Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Indigent Services Committee, 2007-2008

PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION

President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1987

President's Award of Merit, The Florida Bar, 1994

Professionalism Award, Palm Beach County Bar Association, 2002

Outstanding Past Local Bar President, Florida Council of Bar Presidents, 2005

LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS

"The Pink Elephant in the Office," Palm Beach County Bar Association BulletiniDecernber 2017, pp. 19, 22

"Earned Fees to Be Shared Between Counsel—Operating Account or T st Ac ount?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2017, p. 5

"The New 'Florida Bar Professionalism Expectations'—What N Im Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2016, p. 5

"The Monster in the Closet: Trust-Account ResponsibiliWa" each County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2015, p. 9

"Unprofessional' Versus 'Unethical' (Caution: ad Ahead)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, February 2014, p.

"The Supreme Court's New 'Code for Resolving fessionalism Complaints," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July/August 2013,p. 6

"Motions to Withdraw: EuphemyS 'brs Parade," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2012, p. 11 k

"Tribute to a Mentor," Palm Acabunty Bar Association Bulletin, April 2012, p. 10

"Can You Hear Me Now'? Who Else Is Listening?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 20110.19

Code of Pretriand Trial Conduct Teaching Syllabus, American College of Trial Lawyers, Irvine, 2011 (co-autfiFileontributor)

"The Dance of the Lawyer Expert: What Ethical Issues and When?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, September 2010, p. 13

"Through the Looking : When Is an 'Earned Retainer' Earned?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2009, p. 7

"Terminal One-Upmanship and Other Phenomena of the Lawyering Life," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2009, p. 7

"Threatening Disciplinary Proceedings: In the Mind of the Beholder?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2007, p. 13

"Outsourcing Legal Work: Smart Practice Management or Ethical Quagmire?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, April 2007, p. 13

"Lawyers' Ancillary Businesses," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, March 2007, p. 13

"The Adversary System: A Matter of Theology?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, December 2006, p. 13

"Investigators Gone-: Who Pays the Tab in a Blame-the-Lawyers World?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2006, pp. 17-18

"Changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2006, pp. 17-18

"Metadata: What Are the Ethical Implications?" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, June 2006, p. 7

Chapter 1, "Theories of Liability," Professional Liability of Lawyers in Flori a th e ., the Florida Bar, Tallahassee, 2006, (also authored same chapter in earlier editions)

"Business Transactions With a Client: Are You a Lawyer or an Entre re ' Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2005, p. 17

"Identifying the Client: The First Line of Defense," Palm Be January 2005, pp. 15-16 4s)co Bar Association Bulletin,

"Confidentiality and the 'Snitch Rule': An Ethical C Bulletin, December 2004 lm Beach County Bar Association

Report of the Legal Ethics Committee of the American College of Trial Lawyers on Duties of Confidentiality, American College of Lawyers, Irvine, CA, 2001 (co-author/contributor)

"The Bar Looks at the Future," The F Journal, vol. 71, no. 5, May 1997, p. 32

LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS ,(A'

"Professionalism Expectations and Contentious Cases;' at Palm Beach County Bar Association LLC Member Disputes seminar, West Palm Beach, June 16, 2017

"Professionalis at Palit Beach County Bar Association Modification of Parenting Plans: Seven Practical ps minar, West Palm Beach, April 28, 2017

"Great Ex ctat ns: Professionalism Expectations for Florida Lawyers," at The Florida Bar Putting the\ Professionalism symposium, West Palm Beach, April 21, 2017 (panelist)

"ExpeTi Part 2: Permissible Lawyer-Expert Testimony—What Can You Get Into Evidence?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, August 1, 2015 (moderator)

"Expert Witnesses, Part 1," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Houston, February 7, 2015 (moderator)

"Ethical Considerations: Your License Is in Play," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Spying Spouses: Divorce in a World of Cyber Warfare and E-Everything seminar, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2013

"The Tangled Web of Ethics, Advertising, Websites & Social Media," at The Florida Bar Family Law Section webinar, September 11, 2013 (panelist)

"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With Lawyer-Referral and Legal Support Services," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 22, 2012 (including written materials)

"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, May 2, 2012 (panelist)

"Ethics Workshop," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Islan bruary 10, 2012 (panelist)

"The New Oath of Admission," at Florida Association for Women Lawyers PalrliBeh County Chapter luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 9, 2011 (panelist)

"Lawyer Beware: Ethical Issues With For-Profit Referral and Legal-Support Services," at Palm Beach County Bar Association & Small Firm Practitioners luncheon, West palm Beach, November 2, 2011

"Lawyer Ancillary Business: What Hat Are You Wearing Today—lawyer or Entrepreneur?" at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeirg> fanFrancisco, August 6, 2010 (panelist)

"The Bars Professional Disciplinary System," at Lormarrld ational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (including written materials)

"Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (includingWritten materials)

"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, May 20, 2010 (includine tten materials)

"Commercial Litigation," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Bench-Bar Conference, West Palm Beach, February 19, 2010 (panelist)

"Ripped From the Case five Corporate Internal Investigations, Multiple Representations, and U.S. v. Ruehle," at erican Bankruptcy Institute Caribbean insolvency Symposium, Boca Raton, February 10 (panelist and counsel for Appellee in mock oral argument)

"Ethics an Pro nalism: The Rothstein Scandal & Beyond;' at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program Leadership ,Luncheon Series, Coral Gables, January 26, 2010 (panelist)

"Evidentiary Foundations and Objections," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Judicial Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 16, 2009 (moderator)

"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2009 (panelist)

"Tanned, Rested, and Ready—Now What? The Practical Side of Expert-Witnessing," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Chicago, July 31, 2009 (moderator/panelist)

Firm Counsel Project Roundtable, at American Bar Association National Legal Malpractice Conference, Miami, April 23, 2009 (moderator)

"Opening Remarks," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, Deerfield Beach, February 18, 2009

"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, October 2, 2008 (panelist)

"Ethics and Professionalism: How to Build Your Reputation & Keep Your License," at University of Miami School of Law, Center for Ethics & Public Service, Ethics & Professional Responsibility Program seminar, Coral Gables, September 9, 2008 (panelist)

"Trial and Pretrial Conduct on Paper and in Practice: A Cut Above the Ordinary," ajjgnth Circuit Bench & Bar Conference, Colorado Springs, September 5, 2008 (panelist)

"The Bar's Professional Disciplinary System," at Lorman Educational Service Effiics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materia

'Terminating Representation," at Lorman Educational Services Legal E a i IFlorida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials) -

"Conflicts of Interest," at Lorman Educational Services Legal Ethics in Florida seminar, West Palm Beach, June 6, 2008 (including written materials)

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judicial Campaign Conduct forum, West Palm Beach, May 8, 2008 (panelist)

"Leadership Through Service," at Palm Beach Co ty Gar Association Leadership Academy—The Art of Leadership program, West Palm BeactvAprif-25, 2008 (panelist)

\ N, What Tangled Webs We Weave: Conflicts otInterest in Trust & Estate Practice," at The Florida Bar Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section Trust & Estate Symposium: Litigating Under Florida's New Trust Code, Fort Lauderdale and Tampa, February 7 and 8, 2008 (including written materials) ), ,,-

1 --' rdt , "Conflicts of Interest," at Pal Bead? County Bar Association Professionalism Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beac rfebruary 6, 2008 (including written materials)

"Investigators (and Lawyeys) Gone.: The Ethical Ramifications of Pretexting and Undercover Investigations," at American College of Trial Lawyers Tri-State Meeting, Sea Island, February 1, 2008 (includirvritten materials)

"Investiga d aWyers) Gone-: The Ramifications of Covert and Deceptive Tactics," at Na ciation of Legal Investigators conference, Fort Lauderdale, January 25, 2008

"De511 YWhh Difficult Opposing Counsel," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, December 3, 2007 (panelist)

"Panel Discussion on Professionalism," at The Florida Bar Young Lawyers Division Practicing With Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, FL, November 2, 2007 (panelist)

"Ethics Shrugged: Supervising Outside Agents in a Blame-the-Lawyers World," at The Florida Bar Masters Seminar on Ethics, Orlando, June 29, 2007 (including written materials)

"Dealing With Difficult Clients," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Mentoring Luncheon Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, FL, May 16, 2007 (panelist)

"You Can't Always Say What You Want: Limits on Lawyer Speech Post-Fieger," at Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers meeting, Miami Beach, February 9, 2007 (moderator/panelist)

"Achieving Success in the Practice of Law: Lessons Learned in Thirty-Nine Years at the Bar," at Palm Beach County Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Lunch With the Legends Series luncheon, West Palm Beach, November 8, 2006

"Ethical Concerns Regarding Attorneys' Ancillary Businesses," at The Florida Bar Mastersi,Seminar on Ethics, Boca Raton, June 23, 2006 (including written materials) ("Masters Semiin2rori)€thics")

"Conflicts of Interest," at American College of Trial Lawyers Current Developme Civil Procedure, Evidence and Legal Ethics seminar, Hollywood, April 6, 2006 (including terials)

"Conflicts of Interest," at CLE International Ethics seminar, Tampa, Febrpar written materials) 6 (including

"Update on the New Rules of Professional Conduct," at Palm Be Annual Professionalism Seminar, West Palm Beach, April 8, ounTv Bar Association 14th

"Final Arguments," at National Institute for Trial Advoca and Florida Legal Services, Inc., Critical Trial Skills for Beach, January 3-6, 2005 (faculty member) / IA) Ammerican College of Trial Lawyers, Services Attorneys seminar, Deerfield

"Ethics & the Unauthorized Practice of Law: HoWParalegals Are Affected," at Paralegal Association of Florida 26th Annual Meeting & Seminar, West Palm Beach, September 20, 2002

"Avoiding Legal Malpractice," at Professional Education Systems Institute The Briar Patch: Thorny Issues in Florida Civil Litigation seminar, Dania, August 20, 2002 (including written materials)

"Avoiding Malpractice," at Palrallach County Bar Association Family Law seminar, West Palm Beach, December 8, 2000( "/

"Ethical Challenges Facing Today's dttorney," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 9th Annual Ethics and Professionalism Workshop and Seminar, West Palm Beach, May 31, 2000

"Applied Ethics,",at the Palm Beach County Bar Association North County Section Ethics Seminar and Luncheon,0 h Palm Beach, May 26, 1999

"Avoiding cti e Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP. and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, ach, January 15, 1999

-AveNeyfir alpractice Claims," at Holland & Knight LLP and Small-Firm Practitioners Seminar, West Palm Beach, November 5, 1997

Palm Beach County Bar Association A Study in Professionalism seminar, West Palm Beach, April 29, 1996 (panelist)

"Ethics and Malpractice," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 4th Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, June 2, 1995

"Making the Standards of Professionalism Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 3rd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 18, 1993

"Jury System—New Approaches," at American Inns of Court chapter meeting, West Palm Beach, February 11,1993 (panelist)

"Professionalism in Litigation Practice Outside the Courtroom," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 2nd Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, May 28,1992

"Making the Standards Work," at Palm Beach County Bar Association 1st Annual Ethics Luncheon, West Palm Beach, March 22,1991

"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at Nova Southeastern University School of Law ri tation assembly, Fort Lauderdale, August 16,1990

"Conversations on Professionalism," at Rumger Professional Issues Forum, Or anuary 1990 (panelist)

"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly admitted and ers, West Palm Beach, October 30,1987

"Role and Responsibility of Lawyers," at ceremony for newly a Florida lawyers, West Palm Beach, May 31,1985

"The Bar and Its Works," at West Palm Beach Rotary CIO n, West Palm Beach, May 7,1985

CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE

Member, Board of Directors, Hanley Center FoNlation, Inc. (d/b/a Hanley Foundation), 2013—date (Treasurer, 2015—date)

Member, Board of Directors, Educatfbn ation of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1986-2009 (President, 1989-1991,1992-1995; Chairperson, 2002-2003; Honorary Co-Chairperson, 25th Anniversary Spirit of Youth Awards Dinner, February 19, 2009)

Member, State Board of Directors, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2005-2008 (Member, Governance CommIttee, 2007-2008)

Member, Division Advisory Board, South Coastal Division, Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc., 2002-204( airperson, Bylaws Committee, 2007-2010; Co-Chairperson, Fund Development Comm 20 2011)

Member, Directors, Nelle Residence for Girls, Inc., 1982-1989,1997-2009 (Prean , 1986-1988,1997-2000,2002-2009)

Member Roger- Stadium Advisory Board, 2002—date (Chairperson, 2013-2014)

Member, Board of Directors, Greater West Palm Beach Division, Florida/Puerto Rico Affiliate, American Heart Association, 2001-2003

Member, Economic Council of Palm Beach County, Inc., 1988-2002 (Member, Education Committee, 1989-1992, 1994-1998; Member, Executive Committee, 1994-1995; Member, Task Force on the Florida Constitution, 1997-1998; Member, Strategic Action Committee, 2000-2002)

Co-Chairperson, Steering Committee, Principals Leadership Training Institute (joint project of the School Board of Palm Beach County and the Education Foundation of Palm Beach County), 2003-2004 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Superintendent-Candidates Citizens Interview Committee, 1995 Member, School Board of Palm Beach County Strategic Planning Committee, 1988-1992 Member, Palm Beach County Court Facilities Planning Committee, 1986-1987 Member, Coordinating Committee, Project Mosaic (community-wide collaboration-, develop strategies for achieving stable racial balance in Palm Beach County's public satools), 1989-1991 Member, Steering Committee, Education Foundation of Palm Beach Cou t upe ntendent-Qualifications Forum, 1995 II Member, Palm Beach County Champions, WorldClass Schools, 1995-1 (Chairperson, 1995-1997) Member, Campaign Cabinet, United Way of Palm Beach County, Inc., 2001-2002 Member, Board of Directors, Zoological Society of the Palm Beaches, Inc, 19705 Member, Board of Directors, Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, 1981-1990 Member, Board of Directors, YMCA of the Palm Eleatbes, tile., 1983-1986 Member, Society for American Baseball Reseeich (SABR), 1997—date (Co-Chairperson, Host Committee, 2000 Annual Convention Sustaining member, Friends of the (National Baseball of Fame and Museum, Inc.), 1999—date Member, Board of Directors, ect Park/Southland Park Homeowners Association, 1987- 1988 Member, Palm Beach er, Washington and Lee University Alumni Association (Chairperson, 1985-1990)

MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS

"The Inquisitor General," Palm Beach Post, February 22,2010, p. A13 (op-ed.) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 3)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2009, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 2)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, November 2008, p. 16 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Abolish Capital Punishment! (Part 1)," Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, October 2008, p. 19 (regarding capitalization) "Sticklers Unite! Save Only, the Lonely!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2008, p.17

"Sticklers Unite! Ban Verbing the Noun!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, January 2008. pp. 11, 21

"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Semicolonitis!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, July-August 2007, p. 17

"Sticklers Unite! Save the Apostrophe!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, May 2007, p. 18

"Sticklers Unite! Stamp Out Death by Comma!" Palm Beach County Bar Association Bulletin, March 2007, pp. 18-19

From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society forAmerican-Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000 (editor)

"From McGillicuddy to McGwire: Spring Home to Record-Setters," From ftaillictickly to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseball Research, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 3-5

"All-Time Florida-Born Major League Baseball Team," From Mcpikteddy to McGwire: Baseball in Florida and the Caribbean, Society for American Baseba Researdi, Cleveland, 2000, pp. 15-16

MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS

"Public Education: The Lifeblood of Democracy," given at Education Foundation of Palm Beach County Spirit of Youth Awards dinner, West Palm.Beach, January 30, 2003

"Citizenship and the Search for Justice," given at Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Week luncheon, Palm Beach, September 16, 1996

"The Future of Public Education," given at Sun-Sentinel "The '90s: Palm Beach County Faces the Future" forum, Lake Worth, May 15, 1990

PERSONAL

Born and reared in-West Palm Beach, Florida (fourth-generation resident)

Married to Dr. Donna Marks; two children, two grandchildren, three stepchildren, and three step-grandchildren

Hobbies andinterests:

\ \13aseball—past, present, and future

Piano

Lexicology, syntax, and writing style

EXHIBIT R

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF it?ON'S NOTICE OF FILING UPDATED UNVERIFIED ANSWERSI XPERT INTERROGATORIES

Go

Plaintiffitounter-Defendant, Jeffre ein ursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340, hereby provides notice o g of his Updated Unverified Answers to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff B r y ards' September 15, 2017, Expert Interrogatories, in farther support of his Decembe c:6 , 2017, Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness and pursuant to counsel' k stat en at the January 17, 2018, hearing.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the Notice has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 18, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1) and the Notice with the Answers have been served via e-mail.

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
+ West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+ (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link
+ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
+ Angela M. Many (FBN 26680)
+ Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Angela@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Tanya@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Eservice@linkrocklaw.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+ Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + +
+ Jack Scarola
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ J. [REDACTED] + 		+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+ J. [REDACTED] +
+ + + + + + + + +
+

J. [REDACTED]
+Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 4.4 1

v.

4 A49

li~ PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE FFREY EPSTEIN'S PDATED ANSWERS T NTERROGATORIES

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. ,individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je Procedure 1.340, hereby provid September 15, 2017, xpe nterrogatories. (Spst iti("Epstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil nswers to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J.

EXPER FERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN

  • I. State the e, ad ess and profession of each person whom you expect to call as an expert a trial or on whose expert opinions others have relied in forming opinions whic ou ill or may offer at trial.

\a\ANSWER

D. Culver Skip) III, Esq. Culver III, P.A. 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Lawyer

  • 2. "With regard to each listed above, state his/her background, education and experience which qualify him/her to testify as an expert in his/her area of expertise; and/or in lieu thereof, please provide a copy of each expert's most recent curriculum vitae.

ANSWER

A copy of Mr. Curriculum Vitae was attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List.

  • 3. Give the name or title of each paper which each expert has authored in th his/her expertise.

ANSWER

0 See Mr. Curriculum Vitae attached to Epst is Secember 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List.

  • 4. State the name, volume and page number of th paper listed above can be found n in which each article or

ANSWER

See Mr. Curriculum Vine attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List.

  • 5. State the substance and enti e source of the facts on which each expert has relied in forming any opinion abo ich the expert is expected to testify.

will testify as to legal ethics and responsibility, probable cause mmencing a civil action, and professional reputation. The sources of cts on which he is relying are principally the pleadings, other public 'nformation that was available before the original proceeding was initiated or discovered during the pendency of the original civil proceeding, deposition testimony, and the circumstances of Mr. defamation action against Alan Dershowitz.

+

  • 6. Give a complete list of all documents, depositions, exhibits, plans, drawings, ordinances or statutes which each expert has reviewed in forming his/her opinion.

ANSWER

Nov. 09 News articles marked as Exhibits 2, 3, 4 and 5 at [REDACTED]
+ [REDACTED] November 10, 2017, deposition
+ 11/20/09 Razorback Complaint
+ 12/07/09 Epstein's Complaint
+ 01/09/13 [REDACTED] Fourth Amended Counterclaim
+ 04/08/16 [REDACTED] v. Dershowitz; Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for
+ Partial Summary Judgment
+ 04/08/16 Article: Defamation lawsuits involving U.S. lawyer
+ Dershowitz end in settlement
+ 06/30/17 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein
+ 11/10/17 Deposition Transcript of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
+ 11/14/17 Order Granting Epstein's Motion for Continuance of Trial,
+ etc.
+ 11/29/17 Hearing Transcript
+ 12/05/17 Hearing Transcript
+ 12/07/17 Hearing Transcript
+ 01/09/18 Notice of Taking Video Deposition
+Debrincat v. Fischer, 217 So. 3d 68 (Fla. 2017)
+Endacott v. International Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915
+ (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
+Fundament v. May, 445 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
+ [REDACTED] v. Kostroff, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (M.D. Fla. 2000)
+ Rule 4-1.7 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar
+ Restatement, Third, of Law Governing Lawyers § 125
+ Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 74-20 (1974)

7. State the opinions to which the experts aforementioned are expected to testify.

ANSWER

    +
  1. 1. Based on the information available to them, Mr. Epstein had probable cause to file a civil action against Mr. [REDACTED]—i.e., a reasonable person had cause to believe that Mr. [REDACTED] was involved in a scheme to entice investors to invest in purported settlements of claims against Mr. Epstein.
    2. +
  2. 2. Mr. [REDACTED] was ethically obligated to L.M. to disclose the conflict between his personal interests and her interests in connection with his representation of her in Mr. Epstein's lawsuit against them and should have obtained her informed consent to his representation before representing her.
    3. +

  • 8. Give a summary of the grounds of each opinion stated.

ANSWER,

  • I. While at the Rothstein firm, Mr. represented three alleged sexual-abuse victims of Mr. Epstein in litigation against Mr. Epstein and participated in litigation tactics and strategies which could be perceived as not directly related to his clients but in furtherance of Rothsten's Ponzi scheme.
  • 2. Extensive media coverage and other criminal and civil fili described a Ponzi scheme operated by individuals at the i firm which utilized cases against Epstein to corroborate l ter the claims made to investors in the Ponzi scheme, incl ng ere were \$200 million of settlements relating to cases agai Epstein.
  • 3. Mr. held himself out as a partner he had the authority to direct and mana that he was handling.
  • 4. Mr. and L.M.'s inte in of Mr. Epstein's claims against them either were dir v e from the outset, or there existed a substantial risk ould become adverse during the course of the litigation. thus implying that

  • 9. Identify where the expert e has practiced or worked in his/her field during the past 10 years

ANSWER

th s Curriculum Vitae attached to Epstein's December 15, ed Trial Witness List

  • 10. osition identified above, please state:
    • b. Whether the expert was self-employed by someone else or associated as a partner. Each address where the expert practiced or was employed.
    • c. The dates the expert was with each employer.
    • d. The type of duty the expert performed with each employer.

ANSWER

See Mr. Curriculum Vitae attached to Epstein's December 15, 2017, Amended Trial Witness List.

  • 11. If the expert has not practiced or worked in his/her field during the last 10 years, what was his/her employment during this time.

ANSWER

N/A

  • 12. Did the expert prepare anything or have anything prepared dufefth his/her opinions or conclusions reached from his/her examination r at tests he/she conducted?
    • a. If so, state the date of preparation.
    • b. The name or other means of identifi Ss, 'o f ch individual and entity to whom the material prepared was distrib
    • c. The name and address of eac on aho has present custody of each nonidentical copy of the material

ANSWER

No.

  • 13. Did the expert prep re br have prepared any material based upon tests, examinations or analyses ume is that he/she conducted in which he/she did not render an opinion?
    • a. state description of all material that was prepared by or for the expert. ÷he date that the material was prepared.
    • c. The name or other means of identification of the person to whom all material was distributed.
    • d. The name and address of the person who has present custody of each nonidentical copy of the material.

ANSWER

No.

14. If you will do so without a Request to Produce, attach a copy of all materials prepared by or for each expert on the basis of his/her tests, examinations or analyses to your answers to these Interrogatories

ANSWER

None.

15. Is the expert to be compensated for his/her work and efforts in connection with this action?

  1. If so, describe in detail the basis and/or rate of compensation, the total amount paid to or on behalf of the expert, the amount currently payable to the expert for all services rendered as of the date of your answers to these interrogatories.
  2. Estimate the total amount of time reasonably expected to be spent by the expert in completing all services to be rendered in this matter from the date of your answers to the conclusion of the case.
  3. Describe all additional services expected to be rendered by the expert

ANSWER

Mr. Epstein provided Mr. ██████ with a \$15,000 refundable/replenishable deposit. To date, Mr. Smith has billed or incurred approximately \$9,000 in fees and \$0 in expenses. Mr. ██████ estimates that he will bill \$15,000–\$25,000 for his time preparing for and testifying at his deposition and trial.

16. Has the expert served as an expert witness in any other litigated case in the past 5 years? If so, state as to each case:

  1. The style of the case, the Court in which it was filed and the names and addresses of the attorneys involved.
  2. Whether the expert was retained on behalf of the Plaintiff or Defendant.
  3. The general subject matter as to which the expert provided services.
  4. Whether sworn testimony was given in the case, and, if so, whether the expert or you are in possession of a transcript of the testimony.

+6s

ANSWER

See attached chart. The following attorneys were lead counsel (affiliations and addresses as of that time):

Sarabay Marine, Inc. v.

Plaintiffs' counsel: Steven C. Dupre, Carlton Jorden urt, P.A., 4221 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33

Defendants' counsel: Matthew L. , M, Sco ' e, P.A., 4301 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 400, Tampa

Kapral v. GEICO Indem. Co.:

Plaintiff's counsel: Kerry C. McGuinn, J & Guyton, P.A., 109 North Brush Str Russo 500, Tampa, FL 33602

Defendants' counsel: Amanda P.A., 226 South Palafox S oung, Bill, Roumbos & Boles, Pensacola, FL 32502

Cordell Consultant, Inc. v. Abb

Plaintiffs' counse . Gilbert, Gilbert Yarnell Law Offices, 11000 Prosperity Farip uite 205, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Defend Deborah S. Corbishley, Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., 201 Sou Bi e Boulevard, Suite 1100, Miami, FL 33131

Mr Mr. 9pies of the transcripts of his depositions in the three cases.

D. CULVER Ill

Testimony as an Expert in Court, by Deposition; or by Affidavit/Declaration in Last Five Years (as o January 15, 2018)

DateMatterSubj. of Testimonye of
ProTycepedingo/b/o
Counsel's conflicts of interestTestimony at jury
Counsel's conflicts of interestDepositionDefs.
DepositionDefs.
DepositionPl.
+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3f68d79f62686033f295bbcb366f4bbc158d791 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/EFTA02768083.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,13504 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 302, + "chars": 873432, + "elapsed_seconds": 116.48, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_23_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_56_Picture_0.jpeg", + "_page_87_Picture_0.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF \nRESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S E \nIN'S \nJ. \nITNESS LIST, ETC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 501.3448486328125, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 501.3448486328125, + 356.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 356.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 477.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 355.7818908691406, + 477.6449890136719 + ], + [ + 355.7818908691406, + 491.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 491.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 344.94635009765625, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 344.94635009765625, + 444.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 444.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. December 4, 2018 is t Fi rial Settine on Severed Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 478.7155456542969, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 478.7155456542969, + 472.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 472.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Court Re-Established Deadlines in the Past", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 235.70999999999998 + ], + [ + 354.533203125, + 235.70999999999998 + ], + [ + 354.533203125, + 252.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 252.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Binger Requires this Court to Allow the Exhibi ,,S t)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.3362731933594, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.3362731933594, + 334.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 334.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Florit4 an Binger's Cautionary Tale", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 337.68951416015625, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 337.68951416015625, + 528.5499877929688 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 528.5499877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 501.22799999999995, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 501.22799999999995, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 416.34000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. General Categories", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 242.13514709472656, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 242.13514709472656, + 611.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 611.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. , i21Vew Pre-Trial Filings Ensures an Orderly Process, a Fair Trial and Truth", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 540.959716796875, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 540.959716796875, + 579.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 579.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Epstein's Expert Witness", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 240.67645263671875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 240.67645263671875, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 347.2060241699219, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 347.2060241699219, + 196.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 196.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 376.65000000000003 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 376.65000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 482.1181945800781, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 482.1181945800781, + 121.863037109375 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 121.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AM) \nDIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 466.0257568359375, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 466.0257568359375, + 355.10302734375 + ], + [ + 134.64000000000001, + 355.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. SCHEDULING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 162.38363647460938, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 162.38363647460938, + 382.10302734375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 382.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. UNIFORM PRETRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 289.0801696777344, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 289.0801696777344, + 549.3630218505859 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 549.3630218505859 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 426.5044860839844, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 426.5044860839844, + 95.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 95.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 426.1536560058594, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 426.1536560058594, + 94.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 94.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.036, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 163.404, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 63.036, + 256.77 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. NONCOMPLIANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 202.8779296875, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 202.8779296875, + 135.363037109375 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 135.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Copies furnished to:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 173.52780151367188, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 173.52780151367188, + 380.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 380.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial And Mediation Procedures \nCase No: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 425.8782653808594, + 78.57000000000001 + ], + [ + 425.8782653808594, + 106.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 106.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.79200000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 550.1880000000001, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 550.1880000000001, + 118.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 118.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT PRETRIAL S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.692, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 352.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 208.692, + 352.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Stipulated Facts:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 197.64 + ], + [ + 198.5850372314453, + 213.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 213.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Statement of Issues of Fact for Determination at Trial:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 173.14501953125 + ], + [ + 393.129150390625, + 173.14501953125 + ], + [ + 393.129150390625, + 187.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 187.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Attorneys to Tn. the Case:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 172.05889892578125 + ], + [ + 489.2699890136719, + 187.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 187.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Number of Peremptory Cha Qs Per Party: Three.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 394.256103515625, + 429.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 429.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Each Party's propos .instructions and verdict form, with citations to \nsupporting authorities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 442.26000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.3075561523438, + 471.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 471.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 386.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 386.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRIAL WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.467529296875, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 357.467529296875, + 290.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 290.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXP\nEL14WJTNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 394.47 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 409.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 409.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 377.4541931152344, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 377.4541931152344, + 130.7335205078125 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 130.7335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEINS \nSUPPLEMENTING HIS EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 495.108, + 283.73358154296875 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 283.73358154296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Electronic Service List.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 380.903076171875, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 380.903076171875, + 104.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 104.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ION & \nRQCKENBACH, PA.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 21.87 + ], + [ + 262.6485595703125, + 21.87 + ], + [ + 262.6485595703125, + 64.3470458984375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 64.3470458984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA HAND DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 53.24399999999999, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 187.1910400390625, + 222.75 + ], + [ + 187.1910400390625, + 238.863037109375 + ], + [ + 53.24399999999999, + 238.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND Y EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED EXIABJ", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 473.9812316894531, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 473.9812316894531, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 375.23944091796875, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 375.23944091796875, + 444.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 444.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ja v. effrey Epstein \nUSDC . ase No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 413.4812927246094, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 413.4812927246094, + 438.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 438.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 489.8946838378906, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 489.8946838378906, + 171.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 171.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "17th Judicial Circuit Broward Coun Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.28, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 506.5459899902344, + 185.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.28, + 185.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "0 .' In re Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, PA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 265.405029296875 + ], + [ + 476.38372802734375, + 265.405029296875 + ], + [ + 476.38372802734375, + 284.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 284.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.92999267578125, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 298.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 207.92999267578125, + 298.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United Pr f America v. Scott Rothstein \u2014 Forfeiture Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 493.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 493.3074951171875 + ], + [ + 470.80914306640625, + 507.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 507.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DC Ha. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.36, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 461.912109375, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 461.912109375, + 522.1124877929688 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 522.1124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.26002502441406, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 606.1875 + ], + [ + 376.3413391113281, + 620.8000030517578 + ], + [ + 250.26002502441406, + 620.8000030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": ",ero", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 393.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 335.77288818359375, + 393.2750244140625 + ], + [ + 335.77288818359375, + 409.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 409.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Articles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34075927734375, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 351.34075927734375, + 606.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 606.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA HAND DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.40800000000001, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 184.54486083984375, + 221.94 + ], + [ + 184.54486083984375, + 236.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 51.40800000000001, + 236.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA HAND DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 58.14, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 190.56103515625, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 190.56103515625, + 260.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 58.14, + 260.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT I", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 455.32800000000003, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT J", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT K", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA Y EPSTEIN'S \nCLERK'S TRIAL 1ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0000915527344, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.0000915527344, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 375.1549987792969, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 375.1549987792969, + 514.6124877929688 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 514.6124877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein \n15i\u00b0 Judicial Circuit (:)''", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 457.4662780761719, + 253.53000000000003 + ], + [ + 457.4662780761719, + 283.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 283.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LM (cry . J Epstein \n15th Judicial Circuit \"I: o 0-2008-CA-02805IXXXXMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 374.9984436035156 + ], + [ + 465.99505615234375, + 374.9984436035156 + ], + [ + 465.99505615234375, + 425.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 425.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n'Pi - IC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.048, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 409.5517578125, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 409.5517578125, + 511.5392761230469 + ], + [ + 186.048, + 511.5392761230469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n15111 Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058/OOOCMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 465.96380615234375, + 622.08 + ], + [ + 465.96380615234375, + 651.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 651.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jar oe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUS . . Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.1012878417969, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 410.1012878417969, + 481.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 481.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United States of America (C \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736- \n)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.72, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 423.0375061035156, + 265.68 + ], + [ + 423.0375061035156, + 296.7325134277344 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 296.7325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and a enfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein \n17111 Judicial Circuit Broward C n Case No. 2009-CA-059301-AXXXCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.22, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 502.7904968261719, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 502.7904968261719, + 408.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.22, + 408.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. \nSBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 413.530517578125, + 491.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 413.530517578125, + 522.9002990722656 + ], + [ + 201.96000000000004, + 522.9002990722656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler \u2014 Communication", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.272, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 427.4601135253906, + 562.14 + ], + [ + 427.4601135253906, + 579.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 187.272, + 579.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT L", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S \nSUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW A NI NT TO EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 517.206298828125, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 517.206298828125, + 348.4925231933594 + ], + [ + 95.47200000000001, + 348.4925231933594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 415.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.1553955078125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 543.1553955078125, + 114.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 114.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE*FREY EPSTEIN'S \nAMENDED EX 14/ BIN ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.40521240234375, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 474.40521240234375, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "X TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 375.1549987792969, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 375.1549987792969, + 473.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 473.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CVRA Co cations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 380.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 380.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 171.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 171.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United States of America v. othstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 428.1214599609375, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 428.1214599609375, + 353.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 353.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USDC S.D. Fla. C 4 . -60331", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.484, + 343.6262512207031 + ], + [ + 401.9101257324219, + 343.6262512207031 + ], + [ + 401.9101257324219, + 369.45709228515625 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 369.45709228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Razorback turd: LC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 460.48712158203125, + 451.9800000000001 + ], + [ + 460.48712158203125, + 466.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 466.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "17th Judicial Cir \u2022 roward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 464.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 485.1488037109375, + 464.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 485.1488037109375, + 479.8000183105469 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 479.8000183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Comm \u2022 is on", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 354.72247314453125, + 366.12 + ], + [ + 354.72247314453125, + 382.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 266.21999999999997, + 382.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- Pub", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 397.79999999999995, + 339.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 339.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT M", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.97200000000004, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 114.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 114.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nc EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.356, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 482.46795654296875, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 482.46795654296875, + 348.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 130.356, + 348.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EX TO OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 375.23944091796875, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 375.23944091796875, + 479.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 479.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 214, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 412.72174072265625, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 412.72174072265625, + 157.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 208.07999999999998, + 157.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) \ndockeUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 214, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.48, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 442.0994873046875, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 442.0994873046875, + 564.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 177.48, + 564.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CVRA Co cations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 215, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 376.48980712890625, + 380.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 380.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 171.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 171.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United States of America v. othstein", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 428.1214599609375, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 428.1214599609375, + 353.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 191.55599999999998, + 353.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USDC S.D. Fla. C 4 . -60331", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.484, + 343.6262512207031 + ], + [ + 401.9101257324219, + 343.6262512207031 + ], + [ + 401.9101257324219, + 369.45709228515625 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 369.45709228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Razorback and LC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 460.48712158203125, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 460.48712158203125, + 466.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 466.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "17th Judicial Cir \u2022 roward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 217, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.084716796875, + 464.12999999999994 + ], + [ + 485.084716796875, + 480.1125183105469 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 480.1125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. \u2014 Public Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.86, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 371.6335754394531, + 506.25 + ], + [ + 371.6335754394531, + 521.3624877929688 + ], + [ + 247.86, + 521.3624877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 242, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 243, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0862731933594, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0862731933594, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT N", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 244, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.924, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 138.924, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA HAND DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 186.4188690185547, + 246.24 + ], + [ + 186.4188690185547, + 261.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 261.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 246, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.7, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 137.7, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH \nCOUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.18, + 74.5250244140625 + ], + [ + 496.0395202636719, + 74.5250244140625 + ], + [ + 496.0395202636719, + 129.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 315.18, + 129.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S, LEY J. \nSECOND AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 449.20799999999997, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 449.20799999999997, + 405.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 405.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BJE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 247, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 373.32, + 460.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 460.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 263, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 135.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT P", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 265, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT Q", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 268, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.088, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 476.1360000000001, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 476.1360000000001, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 137.088, + 368.55 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT\n4 \nPSTEIN'S \nTRIAL WIT L", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 269, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.972, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 439.8966979980469, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 439.8966979980469, + 376.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 171.972, + 376.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 274, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 360.46799999999996, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 360.46799999999996, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 401.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 275, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Culver HI \nCURRICULUM VITAE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6522216796875, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 372.6522216796875, + 70.33056640625 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 70.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCCUPATION/PROFESSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 199.52264404296875, + 186.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 186.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPERIENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 131.40420532226562, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 131.40420532226562, + 372.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 372.2005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION AND IJCENSING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 277, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.7049560546875, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 204.7049560546875, + 542.8305816650391 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 542.8305816650391 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 278, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 255.3401641845703, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 255.3401641845703, + 115.9541015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AND LAW-RELATED SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 279, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 275.2586975097656, + 135.45416259765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 135.45416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Palm Beach County Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 253.3020477294922, + 116.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 116.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American College of Trial Law}rers:_,/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.60244750976562, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 255.60244750976562, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 318.916015625, + 609.4540710449219 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 609.4540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Florida Association of Bar Defense Lawyers:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 280, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 673.1099999999999 + ], + [ + 287.0382995605469, + 687.0840835571289 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 687.0840835571289 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "American Bar Association:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 209.42567443847656, + 135.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 135.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Foundation:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 200.07 + ], + [ + 216.93930053710938, + 213.4541015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 213.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal 50th A sarXmmittee, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 407.43 + ], + [ + 382.9705810546875, + 421.2140808105469 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 421.2140808105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Fourth District Court of Appeal Historical Society, Inc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 281, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 330.8506164550781, + 479.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 479.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 278.8744201660156, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 278.8744201660156, + 115.95416259765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 115.95416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 282, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 278.59967041015625, + 232.5841064453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 232.5841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAW-RELATED SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS ,(A'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 283, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 450.2731018066406 + ], + [ + 288.70928955078125, + 450.2731018066406 + ], + [ + 288.70928955078125, + 469.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 469.9540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIC AND CHARITABLE SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 287, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.0171661376953, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 222.0171661376953, + 384.8340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 384.8340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 288, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 528.1200000000001 + ], + [ + 289.8453674316406, + 528.1200000000001 + ], + [ + 289.8453674316406, + 541.9540863037109 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 541.9540863037109 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MISCELLANEOUS SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 300.7051086425781, + 365.3340759277344 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 365.3340759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PERSONAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 289, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 123.11778259277344, + 496.9540710449219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 496.9540710449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT R", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 290, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 470.01599999999996, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF it?ON'S NOTICE OF FILING \nUPDATED UNVERIFIED ANSWERSI XPERT INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 291, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.396, + 311.1456298828125 + ], + [ + 531.4617919921875, + 311.1456298828125 + ], + [ + 531.4617919921875, + 376.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 81.396, + 376.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 292, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "li~\nPLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFE FFREY EPSTEIN'S \nPDATED ANSWERS T NTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 472.18408203125, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 472.18408203125, + 390.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 390.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXPER FERROGATORIES TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 458.24749755859375, + 486.0 + ], + [ + 458.24749755859375, + 500.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 500.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\\a\\ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 294, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.60000610351562, + 569.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 200.77993774414062, + 569.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 200.77993774414062, + 583.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 111.60000610351562, + 583.2324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 141.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 141.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 265.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 265.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 389.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 389.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 295, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 511.9200000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 296, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 296, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 511.9200000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 201.3422088623047, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 201.3422088623047, + 127.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 127.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 297, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.4925994873047, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 200.4925994873047, + 486.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 486.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 200.18515014648438, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 196.02 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 210.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 210.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 298, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 199.78390502929688, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 199.78390502929688, + 445.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 445.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 208.98 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 299, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 197.676, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 443.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ANSWER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 300, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 199.7882537841797, + 100.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 100.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. CULVER Ill", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 301, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 354.2317199707031, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 354.2317199707031, + 66.337646484375 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 66.337646484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 184 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 203 + ], + [ + "Line", + 97 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 192 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 190 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 189 + ], + [ + "Line", + 93 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 184 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 69 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 150 + ], + [ + "Line", + 67 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 133 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 118 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 61 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 158 + ], + [ + "Line", + 79 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Line", + 70 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 94 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 181 + ], + [ + "Line", + 91 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 184 + ], + [ + "Line", + 90 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 177 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 191 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 153 + ], + [ + "Line", + 75 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 193 + ], + [ + "Line", + 94 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 187 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 183 + ], + [ + "Line", + 92 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 145 + ], + [ + "Line", + 73 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 258, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 259, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 260, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 261, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 262, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 263, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 264, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 265, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 266, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 267, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 60 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 268, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 269, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 270, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 271, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 272, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 273, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 274, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 275, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 276, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 277, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 278, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 279, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 280, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 281, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 282, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 283, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 284, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 285, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 286, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 287, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 288, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 289, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 290, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 291, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 292, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 293, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 294, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 295, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 296, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 297, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 298, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 299, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 300, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 301, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768083" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_23_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_23_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5eed79864b1e88e966713a820ba583ab083806d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_23_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:73bb416705f5a510c9dcf03cf576a2334263622e36dcca79751e69cc849c9880 +size 11050 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_56_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_56_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66bed3e0e49e27123885e2e478c1da2566533686 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_56_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:59805040c27a8645f2639d95f46f3e882b3ff74157448bcfd8726ec0da42751e +size 3414 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_87_Picture_0.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_87_Picture_0.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3cbe6d71db3bd1a4ff0e62255d015ff44c1e7eca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768083/_page_87_Picture_0.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a25c2d743110973ec0bc30608ff09f2c647c72d1d47553e9c90953fd4536daa1 +size 11985 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..625570673ce3bce92784192ede7d82571e59b938 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 111. hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXICCMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the November 1. 2018. at 10:00 a.m. at Palm Beach 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 101 Floor, Ft. Laud notice. of Marc S. Nurik scheduled on ervice, Inc., Regions Bank Building, 33394, is hereby postponed until further + +I certify that the foreg ument has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on tober , 018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Adminis .516(b)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By. /s/ Seem'. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: ICara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklawcom Secondary: Trov@linIcrocklaw,com Counsel for Plaint!' j" Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVICE LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 iscoldberaer@agwpa.corn smahonev@aawoa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W., Suite 102 Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541 marc©nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rot \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..438468176e625301d584bf8545221e5e3f189c52 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385/EFTA02768385.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768385.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1545, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 520.4385375976562, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 520.4385375976562, + 328.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 328.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 435.7800000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.5562438964844, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.5562438964844, + 100.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 100.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768385" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe38b7b45ac19b379f8d847180fdae4523530264 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.md @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEARING (Cancels UMC Hearing for 10.31.18) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: November 1, 2018 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable d Hafele + +PLACE: Dixi Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: friN + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LISTS FILED OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN, CONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES [filed 10.10.18] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Re-Notice of Hearing + +✓ + +*Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +*Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion.* + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +*One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented.* + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 29th day of October, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com) +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Re-Notice of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] s, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] s Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 +Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] s adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Re-Notice of Hearing + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kék èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nau tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblém pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rey: 8/20/15 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63664ba20f13690d36b94d266aeba59c193a58fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387/EFTA02768387.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768387.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5314, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEARING \n(Cancels UMC Hearing for 10.31.18)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 396.951171875, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 396.951171875, + 366.363037109375 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 366.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 281.62847900390625, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 281.62847900390625, + 582.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 582.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 119.07 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 133.65 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768387" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b017820326c84a5442f634b3b6b91f59fa54efb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.md @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXIatvlBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plant Mounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. CO SA + +# COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIIfS T1US REPORT ON BANKRUPTCY PROC + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epste this status report on the Show Cause proceedings in the matter of In re R Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Fl e No. 09-34791-RBR, and states: + +1. On March 19, 2018 affe, Weissing, M, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("= Jaffe") moved the Pt urt for issuance of an Order to Show Cause why and Epstein shoul of be e d in contempt of court for violation of the Bankruptcy Court's November 30, 201 Order. J. a") and Intervenors L.M., Jane Doe and E.W C ' ) ed t request. + +2. April 19, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order to Show Cause why and Jeffrey Epstein should not be held in contempt, scheduling an evidentiary show cause hearing on August 23 and 24, 2018. The evidentiary show cause hearing was thereafter continued to October 26, 2018. + +3. On October 2, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court found that Intervenors Jane Doe and E.W. did not have standing to participate in the show cause proceedings or to seek damages because they were not parties to the November 30, 2010, Agreed Order. + +4. On October 25, 2018, Jaffe, and L.M. (collectively, the "Movants") dismissed their Motions for Contempt against Epstein without prejudice. (Exhibit + +A.) In the dismissal, Movants stated that: + +... it is apparent that the party responsible for the violatio Court's November 30, 2011 [sic] Order is Whi I acting in his capacity as legal counsel to Jeffrey violation that occurred with respect to Jeffrey Epstei dually is as a consequence of wrong moving parties are therefore dropping the Motion Co, empt against Jeffrey Epstein in order to focus the a o ere it is most appropriately focused, on Whi' + +5. The Bankruptcy Court's evidenti use hearing went forward on October 26, 2018, before The Honorable Raymond liS Di715ng y the hearing, the Court entered an Order discharging the Order to Show Cause + +6. At the end of t C cA ) 26, 2018, hearing, Judge Ray took the matter under advisement but ordered Fowle ite, Jaffe and to prepare and submit by November 13, 2018 or th C urt's consideration proposed orders on the "very narrow issue" of whether Fowl i 'olated the November 30, 2010, Agreed Order. + +7. in's Motion for an in camera review of the 47 exhibits that claims are prot by the attorney-client privilege remains pending before this Court. + +The Bankruptcy Docket does not yet reflect the Order, but it was entered during the October 26, 2018, hearing. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on October 30, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W., Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# EXHIBIT A + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +Debtor. + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +CHAPTER 11 + +# NOTICE OF JOINT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JEFF % TEIN + +Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1XAXi), Federal Rules of Civil P , Jaffe Weissing Fistos & Lehrman, J. an eby voluntarily dismiss their respective Motion's for Contempt against Jeffrey E rQ ut prejudice. + +Upon completion of the limited discove i it is apparent that the party responsible for the violations of this Court's o r 30, 2011 Order is , while acting in its capacity as legal counsel to to Jeffrey Epstein individually is ence of wrongdoing. The moving parties are therefore dropping I on for Contempt against Jeffrey Epstein in order to focus the attention where it is ropriately focused, on tein. Any violation that occurred with respect + +Each pa its own attorney's fees and costs in this matter. + +Dated: Oc 0 8 Respectfully Submitted, + +/s/ J. POTT1NGER LLC J. FLBN 54207 BrittenN. FLBN 118247 Pottinger LLC 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +SA, for =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 25, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certified that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the on e attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those co not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. ctroi lc Filing es who are + +/ /Brad + +Niall T. McLachlan, Esq. Carlton Jorden Burt, P.A. 100 SE 2nd Street, Suite 4200 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: 305-530-0050 Facsimile: 305-530-0055 Primary Email: nmclachlan Secondary Email: c Attorneys for + +Scott J. Link, Link & Rock tt linkr com K in 1555 h Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Pal = each, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire igoldberger(ThAewoa.com smahoney@agwoa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +*Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein* + +Jack Scarola +Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com) +[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com) +[scarolateain@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateain@searcylaw.com) +*Counsel for* [REDACTED] *J* [REDACTED] + +Phil Burlington, Esq. +Nichole J. Segal, Esq. +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +[njs@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:njs@FLAppellateLaw.com) +[kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com](mailto:kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com) +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +*Attorneys for* [REDACTED] *J.* [REDACTED] + +Jay Howell +Jay Howell & Associates +Florida Bar No.: 225657 +[jay@jayhowell.com](mailto:jay@jayhowell.com) +644 Cesery Blvd. #250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +(904) 680-1234 +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe + +Paul G. Cassell +S.J. Quinney College of Law at the +University of Utah +332 S. University St. +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +(above for address purposes only) +[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu) +Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1092a11a1f4ce4a2930155edde9a7c4b95baa5a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392/EFTA02768392.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,473 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768392.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 11754, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.76, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIIfS T1US REPORT \nON BANKRUPTCY PROC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 487.9444274902344, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 487.9444274902344, + 329.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 329.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 402.57 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.81768798828125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 423.81768798828125, + 128.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 128.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF JOINT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JEFF % TEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.16, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 502.5478820800781, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 502.5478820800781, + 252.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 252.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 113.14501953125 + ], + [ + 388.4950866699219, + 113.14501953125 + ], + [ + 388.4950866699219, + 127.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 127.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768392" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d44c8c57b5912470e937b4ec0a43491f01ab6aab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +RETURN OF NON-SERVICE + +State of Florida + +County of Palm Beach + +Circuit Court + +Case Number: 50-2009-CA-04000-XXXX-MB-AG Court Date: 11/19/2018 10:00 am + +Plaintiff,: +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +vs. + +Defendant,: +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, [REDACTED] J. EDWARD, Individually, and L.M., +Individually, + +For: +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Link & Rockenbach, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Received by [REDACTED] Process Service, Inc. on the 3rd day of October, 2018 at 9:00 am to be served on Beth S. Williamson, 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +I, [REDACTED] Hanzimanolis, do hereby affirm that on the 15th day of October, 2018 at 8:00 am, I: + +NON-SERVED the Subpoena for Videotaped Deposition in the Epstein v. Rothstein Severed Claim and Witness Fee Check in the amount of \$7.00 for the reason that I failed to find Beth S. Williamson or any information to allow further search. Read the comments below for further details. + +Additional Information pertaining to this Service: +10/6/2018 5:35 pm Attempted service at 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. Given address is a gated condo building. Name is on call box. No answer. Left message. Recording says number reached is 954-336-4125. + +10/9/18 7:26 am -- Attempted service at 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. No response. + +10/9/2018 6:40 pm Attempted service at 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. Complex is gated. No response. Called on call box. No answer. Also called 954-336-4125 left message. No return call as of yet. + +10/10/2018 6:00 pm Attempted service at 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. No answer on call box. Server gained access. As server approached unit 354, heard sounds like a TV/radio playing. As soon as server knocked, sounds went silent. Knocked many times and called out name several times also. No answer or anyone opened door. Possibly avoiding service. + +10/13/2018 10:10 am Attempted service at 150 NE 15th Avenue, #354, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. Gained access to building. Today's newspaper in front of unit. Knocked on door many times, no response. + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true. I am over the age of eighteen, have no interest in the above action and am a Special Process Server in good standing in the circuit in which service was effected in accordance with State Statutes. + +[REDACTED] Hanzimanolis +SPS# 137 + +[REDACTED] Process Service, Inc. +721 US Highway 1 +Suite 113 +North Palm Beach, FL 33408 +(561) 881-1442 + +Our Job Serial Number: WPS-2018016919 + +![](_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. rOCTEIVED 133 2013 cet + +## %-9 SUBPOENA FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSIT", IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEV RED CL 114X + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Beth S. Williamson 150 N.E. 15'h Avenue, #354 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to...4pp fore a person authorized by law to take depositions on November 19, 2018tat 10:00 a.m. at Palm Beach Repotting Service, Inc., Regions Bank Building, 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 10th Floor, Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33394, for the taking of your videotaped deposition in this action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by Plaintiff's attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena by the attorneys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +Putsuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, this puts you on notice that court reporting services will be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +DATED: October 2, 2018. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakcs Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 91 [fax] + +By: + +Scott J ink (FBN 6029 Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.corrt Primary: ICara@linkrocklaw.coni Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov@linkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Plaintijpeffrey + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this deposition, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Scott J. Link, Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, 561-847-4408, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than Ida c . ifs, are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a6ea46a2763c9c0fb881a48bf8ac359a3e1ecc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/EFTA02768400.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4962, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.1, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 364.75199999999995, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 93.96000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "%-9\nSUBPOENA FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSIT\", \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEV RED CL 114X", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 266.83062744140625 + ], + [ + 459.18499755859375, + 266.83062744140625 + ], + [ + 459.18499755859375, + 308.60302734375 + ], + [ + 164.01600000000002, + 308.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768400" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0bace53815ff407d6e46d127f46b92a7a1894b0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768400/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:71e13c44ee42ee15d92d28c77a75a092799295ecd3ec8d8ab7e218d903d2e160 +size 6659 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d7c9cba952c3baba917a0e0694f2a714fe73018 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +## RETURN OF SERVICE + +State of Florida County of Palm Death + +Case Number: 50.2009-CA-040800.)OOIX-MS-AG Court Date: 11/12010 1903 am + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, vs. + +Defendant: SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually J. EDWARD, Individually, and L.M. InclVidualty, + +Circuit Court + +For: Scott J. Unk, Eatuiro UrJc A Rockenbach. PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Stile 930 West Pain Beach. FL 33401 + +Fteceivod by process senrien, Inc. on the 110 day of °debar, 2018 at BOO am to be served on Marc S. Hunk cf. Law Offices o Marcrc S. Nurik, Ono E. Steward Boulevard, Suite 700. Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. It o, + +I. Penni° Atwell. do hereby affirm that on the 23rd dry of October, 2018 at Z45 pm, Lail% + +Served an AUTHOR/ZED individual by deihrenng a true copy of the Subpoena for Videotaped Deposition In the Epstein v. Rothstein Severed Cake attached \$7.00 witness fee wit, the date and hour of sendioa endorsed thereon by me. la Morica Victoria as Authorized to AcceptfParalegal at the address of: 1075 BrokenfloundParterray NW. Suite 102, Boca Ftaton,FL 33487-1541, who stated they am authorized to accept combo for Marc S. said person of the context; therein. in compaaroe Wei state shatufes. + +Additional Information pertaining to this Service: Atlererded "ewe. at Ono E. Oroward Sou'evard, Suite 700. FL Leudadate, FL 33301 - at given address is an executive ado typo location. Spoke with Afnie frd.ol. Manager. who slates that Mart Nora used to maintain an office here. Gone over two years, left no fortyare:no on fie. Florida Bar gees an address of 1075 Sicken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 102, Boca Raton, Ft. 334873541-561-273-M0. C.alted but manage seems elcd.ronic wand probably Is another virtual office. Cki4 requested service et the Boca address. + +Description of Person Sewed:Age: 30, See F,FeacerSin Cobra Height ST, Weight MO. Hair Monde, Glasses N + +Under penales of perjury. I declare that I have road the foregoing and that the facts stated in it arc Ms. I am over the age of eighteen, have no bleat In the above adbn end am a Certified Process Seem In good standing In the craft In whteh service was effected In accordance Mth State Statutes. + +> Pc a Atwell CP. JI SCM + +INI lane Proems Service, Inc. 7 US Highways S e 113 rth Palm Beach. FL 33409 ( 1) 881-1442 + +Our Job Serial Number: WPS-2016017523 + +Cop-\$'0 1992-2013 Damao Striae. Ye -Preen Sewn Tinter N75, + +![](_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +135L - + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +## SUBPOENA FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Marc S. Nurik c/o Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, EL 3330! + +"S ) + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions on November 1,2018, at 10;00 a.m. at Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc., Regions Bank Building, 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 10'h Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33394, for the taking of your videotaped deposition in this action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You a enaed to appear by Plaintiff's attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpoena ttomeys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +t to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, this puts you on notice that court reporting services will be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +DATED: October 10, 2018, + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 (fax] + +By: Isl Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: 5cott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.cota Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.corn Secondary: Troy@linkrocktaw.com + +Counsel for Plaintiff stein + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any acco mod ion in order to participate in this deposition, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Scott J. Link, Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1535 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, 561447-4408, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 day (0s ; ' tore , hearing or voice impaired, call 7I1. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ceddfbdf041842e790fecc7c93c1076a11a4554 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/EFTA02768403.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4686, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.09, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.02, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 106.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTEIN SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.3958435058594, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 451.3958435058594, + 306.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 306.9735412597656 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768403" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84f17f92814576e3c866b7d557ed7347262500eb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768403/_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:90ca151f8d6d3d80af807ce4d3f41ac377dbd9fbc8a3eb569c675a3ec6b512e4 +size 5828 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e18edbf68dae6cc56aa4e20671fff6d911030d92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTC-[STEIN Individually, J. , Individually, and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +n IV : . co + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY E RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATOTATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, JeffEildlpin, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this his Response to r Admissions and Answer to Interrogatory of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, B dwards, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370 and states as follow + +- 1. subp n objects to the Request for Admissions because the total, including thy (30) requests. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.370(a). + - 2. There are in excess of sixty (60) Requests for Admissions including subparts. +- 3. In addition to the objections above, with regards to Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to these requests on the grounds that they are + +## EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO RFA + +irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and require information which would be protected by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. + +4. In addition to the objection in Paragraph 1, with regard to Request for Admissions in Paragraphs 13, 14, 15, and 22, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests are irrelevant and propounded for the purpose of harassment. + +5. In addition to the objection in Paragraph 1, with regard to Para Al\*s 1 , 17, 18, 19, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds are irrelev ended for the purpose of harassment, and the response would require the Plai •unter-Defendant to disclose attorney-client work product communications. + +6. In addition to the objection in Paragraph , ,v'itith regard to the Request for Admissions in Paragraph 25, 28, and 29, the .)\ti ounter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests are irrelevant, overbroad and p u ded for the purpose of harassment. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly fu fished via 0 Email, O Facsimile, fitio.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this ay of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. 7, Searcy Denney Scan& Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakea Blvd. West Palm Beach, PL 33409 + +Jack Alan\ berger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Jo h L. ckerman, + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +B + +901 Point + +777 South Flagl + +West Palm Beach a 33401 + +Telephone: 8 -9044 + +Facsimi 02-9976 + +A Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff) efendant 4 + +cr \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4da7a8316e39fff5d56d22e79755eb782ea365b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406/EFTA02768406.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768406.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2952, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY E RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. REQUEST FOR \nADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATOTATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.482, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 522.0165405273438, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 522.0165405273438, + 386.8585510253906 + ], + [ + 76.482, + 386.8585510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO RFA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.60199999999998, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 423.2237243652344, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 423.2237243652344, + 523.7285461425781 + ], + [ + 173.60199999999998, + 523.7285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 417.96 + ], + [ + 380.6180725097656, + 417.96 + ], + [ + 380.6180725097656, + 433.488037109375 + ], + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 433.488037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768406" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92d9509a00ef8a250abf934c2dc808149c6a0778 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMountcr-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO SA + +## NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HE + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Counter-Defeo y Epstein, will call up the following hearing at the time stated below, before t iic le Donald W. Hafele, in Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse ea%? Dixie Highway, Courtroom 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Counter-De rey Epstein's April 27, 2018, Motion to Allow it List and May 2, 2018, Supplement to Motion + +DATE: Novembe 018 + +TIME: 10:1 a + +r'N? S' + +Nis) + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 1, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Trial Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey +Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards | Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████████ J. ██████████
██████████ Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J. ██████████ | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +| Jack A. Goldberger | Paul Cassell | +|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. | 383 S. University St. | +| 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 | Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 | +| West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | cassellpfalaw.utah.edu | +| ictoldberger@aftwoa.com | Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. | +| smahoneygagwpa.com | and Jane Doe | +| | Limited Interveno tit# sel for L.M., E.W. | + +This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative + +"If you are a person with a disability who nee( s any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you arc entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Bea ti; Flopda 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before ur scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this n tcabon if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you ar ring or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted poder p• prop contact' rsona minusvIlida que necesita algun acomodamiento pan en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos ue se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en n Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por to menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted time discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moon Id enfim Id bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, on kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Ilighway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +65( \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..847ac28930678398f965cda1a3566a88b56c8b83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409/EFTA02768409.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768409.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6252, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.288, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 411.26400000000007, + 307.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 198.288, + 307.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 58.31999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 388.79999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768409" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e55aa4c28b356db3fccd2f7a834b5363abd6345 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003000CtviBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +t" T R. TH aiT lt ividually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A Cos + +## COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E LIMITED OBJECTION TO VIDEOTAP RIAL + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epst s to the Court's Notice to Counsel of Record regarding Radical Media's Requ to tape the Trial commencing on December 4, 2018. Florida Rule of Judicial A ti 2.450 provides for technological coverage of judicial proceedings, including and still photography. This rule does not implicitly give the right to media outlets fi proceedings in the courtroom and around the courthouse facility. The power to pe rohibit the use of electronic media inside the courtroom lies with the chief judge e judge presiding over the case who together balance the media's news gatheringji the dignity of the judicial process and safety concerns to the public. + +not against video or still photography in general, Epstein suggests that the overarching need for some persons' privacy in this case would require some reasonable restrictions. + +Due to the expected sensitive testimony in this case, a higher concern for maintaining decorum during the process is justified. See Administrative Order 2.208-2/09. + +If this Court is inclined to allow media within the courtroom during the trial, Epstein requests that the rules set forth within Administrative Order 2.208-2/09 and the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration be abided by, which are: + +- Only one portable television camera operated by only one person within the courtroom is allowed. +- Only one still photographer not using more than two still cameras wit °unworn is allowed. +- Only one audio system operated by one person within the o is allowed. +- Only equipment that does not produce distracting li sounds within the courtroom is allowed. No artificial lighting device shall nnection with the equipment. +- The equipment shall be positioned in s as the judge designates. +- Media representatives shall not e d the court facility while proceedings are in session and microphones ui ent shall not be moved during the proceedings. ord audio or visually any of the bench conferences cussions between the attorneys and their clients. e restrictions as required to provide the appropriate level of +- Media representatives of counsel or any o +- Such other re privacy decorum and to safeguard the rights and privacy of the parties, witnesses + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 5, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com +*Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
isx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff | Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| J. [REDACTED]
J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W.
Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541 marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edaaf13f266b989f672363ea540d1d25f92aeec7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413/EFTA02768413.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768413.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 7538, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E LIMITED \nOBJECTION TO VIDEOTAP RIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 464.8760986328125, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 464.8760986328125, + 342.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 342.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 372.6 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 372.6 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 386.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768413" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..974cd22c251bb0f136c308cf243b6617dd1186b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMountcr-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. 04 + +## NOTICE OF UMC HEARIN LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ &ord. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach Primary: Sco linIcr. Primary: Kara i oc Secondary: Tina 1 roc law Secondary: Tr inkrocklaw aw. 903) m m m m + +Trial C Epste ounter-Defendant Jeffrey + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, ey, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boul and West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mepAsearcylaw.com jsx@searcylaw.coni, njs@FLAppellateLaw.com dvitale@searcylawsom kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com scarolateam rcAsw.com Co-Counseitiendant/Counter-Plaintiff te team earc aw.com .1 Co-Cour efendani/Counter-Plaintiff Brad . ards + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLAvvellateLaw.com + +J. Marc S. Nurik Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@epllc.com Co-Counseloalendant/Counter-Plaintiff .1. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +| Jack A. Goldberger | Paul Cassell | +|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. | 383 S. University St. | +| 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 | Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 | +| West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | cassellSlaw.utah.edu | +| ictoldberger@aftwoa.com | Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E. W. | +| smahoneygagwpa.com | and Jane Doe | +| | Limited Interveno tit# sel for L.M., E.W. | + +This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative + +"If you are a person with a disability who nee( s any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you arc entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Bea ti; Flopda 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before ur scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this n tcabon if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you ar ring or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted poder p• prop contact' rsona minusvIlida que necesita algun acomodamiento pan en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos ue se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en n Tammy Anton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono numero (561) 355-4380, por to menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se von moon Id enfim Id bezwen akomodasyon you w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, on kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan you w peye, gen pwovizyon you jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, koodonate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Ilighway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +cbs \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0b12a4625dc8e8d9126620eb0d49788a2a35993 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417/EFTA02768417.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768417.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4691, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UMC HEARIN THE HO CIRCUIT ELE + +## SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff ██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
██████ J. ██████

| + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +NOTA CERTIFICATE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768421/EFTA02768421.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768421/EFTA02768421.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56bc12325377aebc21fac8ffa5f5d154be90ae84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768421/EFTA02768421.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768421.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 10029, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.08837890625, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.08837890625, + 127.10302734375 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 127.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON BRIEFING FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.268, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 454.04754638671875, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 454.04754638671875, + 343.85302734375 + ], + [ + 146.268, + 343.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 345.8812561035156, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 345.8812561035156, + 326.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 326.73248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768421" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e10d08f792b283380d21cf7df04804a0d11d2fe4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT TAPED DEPOSITION IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE D CLAIM + +(1/4 + +OA + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that thit taped deposition of Beth S. Williamson scheduled on November 19, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. at Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc., Regions Bank Building, 100 S.E. Third Avyquc, I OtkeFloor, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33394, is hereby / 1 postponed. + +## ATE OF SERVICE + +I certify tha the omg document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List beloyr i Nov ber 7, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule ofJudici tmtion 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffieffrey Epstein + +## **SERVICE LIST** + +| Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + + NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96377a7d2ed66b7753205893dc13590e1978356f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426/EFTA02768426.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768426.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2874, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT \nTAPED DEPOSITION \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE D CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 486.363037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 486.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768426" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..507086042886d47bd7805cabf35d08e6820aad6a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A Cos + +4O + +## N TI E F C + +S YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED , dersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: November 20, 201 ACcIalee + +TIME: 8:45 AM c JUDGE: Honorable rdHafele + +PLACE: 20 . Dixi Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 1 + +SPECI TTEFtS TO BE HEARD: Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for An In Camera I on of 30 E-Mails. + +N/A' Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +I E-mail only. + +Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or hr telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected hr the relief sought in the motion. + +One or more of the parties who may be affected hr the motion are self represented + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing to all Counsel on the attached list, this 131h day of November, 2018. O AstAVE-Serve + +/s/ David P. Vitale + +JACK SCAROL Florida Bar N DAVID P. II . Florida 5179 Atto I y M (s): jsx ®searcylaw.com and rcylaw.com -Mail: ScarolaTeam®searcylaw.com est enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efile@pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpasom; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +AACe/S9C 14/ Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppell e wV. m Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for + +Berard Rockenbach, re kara®Iinkrocklaw m; udez@flacivillaw.com Link & Rockenb A. 1555 Palm Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm L 33409 Phone: 5 600 Fax:( 3601 Attorneys Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott®IinIcrocIdaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservic,e®Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linIcrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +"1f you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, PHR, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the sc eduled appearance is lesa than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 7 1. + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamierinara oder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se Ie provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en o;tacto con Tammy Anton, PHR Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator" p lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o i ed. tamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de I parecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 (Das; si usted tiene disc n del oído ode la voz, Dame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen ako sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan p Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat oubyen imedyatman apre ou tin rest tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou ou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi eye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. ndevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, asyon an si lè mi gen pou w parèt nan in pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 ? s , .1 Pli'v + ++0 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7044db70bf97da9f643479e5afef7dcc82c729d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428/EFTA02768428.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768428.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4438, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.396, + 114.112548828125 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 114.112548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N TI E F C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 372.9936218261719, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 372.9936218261719, + 362.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 362.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 353.2940368652344, + 143.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 143.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768428" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1502a3a4314e7388e03c05757e7b83f9490e70cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +SCOT!' ROTIISTEIN individually, and J. individually, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +## COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY NOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL COURT C S UNDER SEAL + +EPSTc,P41."\- + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epste' \' t to 15th Judicial Circuit Administrative Order No. 2.303-3/18 and this Co o tuber 6, 2018, Order on Briefing for In Camera Inspection (115) files under seal s onfidential Memorandum in Support of Epstein's Motion for In Camera 1 f 30 mails. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 9, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1) and that a copy of the sealed envelope containing the Confidential Memorandum is being hand delivered to Jack Scarola, Searcy, Denny, et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +(561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. Edwards

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
and Jane Doe

| + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c235cbe346127f64e0aa7cca5c28625e8e0eb54 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433/EFTA02768433.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768433.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6095, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY \nNOTICE OF FILING CONFIDENTIAL COURT C S UNDER SEAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 504.3047180175781, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 504.3047180175781, + 315.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 315.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 71.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 402.57 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768433" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..145fc3312bf859e02e9b99e5d5ac19a07b40a0ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.md @@ -0,0 +1,4739 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and + +J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY a t i3 TEIN'S a MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECT 0 E-MAILS + +Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("E oves' this Court for an in camera inspection of 302 e-mails identified on Eps 2, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List and to find that no privilege applies to them. ils directly contradict sworn testimony and repeated misrepresentatio 's Court. , an officer of this Court, previously disclosed all of these e-mails ther adversary, thereby eliminating any privilege or work product protection that ev d have been applicable to them, and then improperly withheld them from discovery y and what appears to be a deliberate concealment of them in a noncompli log, previously ruled by the Court to be legally deficient, based on false claims + +original Motion was filed on March 5, 2018, but not ruled on before the March 9, 2018, appellate court stay. The parties further agreed to stay hearings on pending motions until mediation was completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching on December 4, 2018, this Court instructed Epstein to file this Motion and deliver the accompanying sealed Memorandum by November 9, 2018. was instructed to deliver a response sealed Memorandum by November 16, 2018. + +2Epstein has reduced the original 47 e-mails for in camera review down to 30 e-mails. + +possible finding by Judge Ray that The Bankruptcy Court, The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, entered an OrdelnQctober 29, 2018 (Exhibit 1), discharging the Order to Show Cause against Epstein in the "disc" on which the e-mails were discovered. As of the time of this submi on, Ray has not yet determined whether =, Epstein's counsel at the ti f t November 2010 Agreed Order (and from whom Link & Rockenbach, PA receiv S ) ), violated the Agreed Order. is hoping that this Court will refuse to i airin , camera inspection because of a c Sy ri/S ently or inadvertently held the disc in its storage facility for some number of ye Eve f Judge Ray makes such a determination, this Court should not excuse F er Jaffe's) failure to produce all of these e-mails as they were required to do and r ese ed they would in 2011. + +of irrelevancy and attorney-client privilege and claims of work product that could no longer possibly be applicable under Florida law.3 Following this Court's in camera review, Epstein seeks a ruling from this Court that these 30 e-mails must be unsealed and properly included on Epstein's Exhibit List. + +#### PREFACE + +Importantly, this found that Link & Rockenbach, PA did nothing wrong relating to its discovery a e disc: + +3Farmer Jaffe agreed to produce all work-product related to closed cases to Epstein's attorne + +&#x27;At the bankru t hearing and for the first time, Epstein's counsel learned from Lilly testimony that was given two discs from the Jaffe firm to create two sets of hard copy documents that were bate stamped. This uncontroverted testimony demonstrated that the "disc" was created for Special Carney and not for or Epstein. The disc was made because, according to Lilly S ecial Carney did not want 27,542 bate stamped pages of documents. Rather, Special Carney wanted a searchable disc. It is still a nig ,how and when the disc came back into possession after it was sent to Special Carney and no evidence has been presented to resolve that question definitively. + +- "I'm not finding fault with anything you or Miss Rockenbach or Miss did. That's not the issue. You've done your job." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 59:1-4)5 +- "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit in the manner in which they had to do it and the timing, unfortunately, of the matter from their perspective in having to do it ..." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 61:15-21.) + +#### IN CAMERA REVIEW + +Epstein requests that the 30 e-mails remain unsealed for the inspection and counsel for both parties be allowed to review and p a ACof -the in camera ent as to each email. This is the same protocol agreed to by Jaffe i hen the Special was contemplating this same review. That is, Jaff turn over work product materials except for materials related to new or ongoing c oned on a "For Attorneys' Eyes Only" basis until such time as the Court et overfillc p vilege claim upon the Special (or Court's) review with counsel present thit 3.) fr + +A + +urt must consider and determine: During its in camera re + +- directly relevant to the issues for trial and no Binger6 44in fact" exists regarding them; +- 2. If any work product protection existed, it was waived or excepted 0 + - a. ed on: to E stein's attorneys; + - b. Jaffe's express agreement to turn over all work product production to Razorback victims/adversaries; +- I. The e-mai + - c. issue injection; and + - d. Crime fraud exception; + - 3. The e-mails do not constitute attorney-client communications. + +sExcerpts of the March 8, 2018, afternoon hearing transcript are attached s Exhibit 2. + +6Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). + +#### BACKGROUND + +#### A. Discovery of Deliberately Concealed E-Mails + +As this Court is well aware, in February 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA discovered documents that were voluntarily produced years ago by to his potential adversaries at the time — the Razorback plaintiffs. These e-mails directly contradict sworn to timony and positions taken by in this action. Importantly, the e-mails eviscerate E ' claim for emotional distress damages, and worse - they illustrate that p ect testimony in this action about his anxiety over being sued by Epstein. They also r ntradict sworn testimony regarding interaction with Ponzi-schemer S ecti o ("Rothstein") and the strength/weakness of clients' damage claims a % t t ein, both which have become critical factual issues in this case. + +First and foremost, the e-mails have e)ighly relevant in light of sworn testimony that Epstein's lawsuit has ca im ly anxiety (emotional damages and credibility). Next, the e-mails are direct eviden fling factual claims made by that he argues disproves probable cause, such his enaction with Rothstein on the Epstein cases and the known "weakness" of the tort c s' damages. While the e-mails only became known to Epstein's current counsel er this year, has known of them from the time of their existence! Moreover, t Is were produced by approximately eight years ago to counsel for Razo rds' adversary at the time. , knowing how potentially damaging the emails are to him professionally, let alone their terminating effect on this lawsuit, has desperately taken multiple positions that Epstein's current counsel improperly obtained the e-mails (proven to be untrue), that none of the e-mails were ever produced (incorrect), and that they are all protected + +subject to attorney-client privilege (false) and/or the work product doctrine (waived or broken by exceptions if ever applicable). + +#### B. la' Deceptively Concealed the E-Mails and Clearly Violated Rule 1.280(b)(6) as Previously Determined by the Court + +is responsible for improperly withholding these undeniably relevant e-mails from Epstein for more than eight years after specifically agreeing to turn over all wot product to Epstein's lawyers. Specifically, Jaffe agreed: + +> [February 2, 2011] All work product materials will be ture rnnc to Plaintiff except for materials related to new or one-anleases, - AND on the condition that they be produced "For At e ' Eyes Only. (Exhibit 3.) + +Unfortunately, this promise to produce gli work p did in fact turn over purported work product spec Ling to three clients' cases against Epstein, which had then been settled i , it did not turn over the e-mails in question relating to those same cases. Further, er to ensure that the e-mails would never see the light of the courtroom, cone xistence by hiding them within a deceptively worded 1,607-entry, 159-page privileg o hat this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David M, found to be insufficient on and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil ci) ollow. Although Jaffe Procedure 1.280 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. IMM 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). + +Ed claimed that none of the documents on the disc that were listed on his privilege log h er en produced. However, this is demonstrably inaccurate. Specifically, on May 7, 2012, produced 163 pages representing 89 documents identified on his 159-page privilege log. In addition, counsel suggested that Link & Rockenbach received the evidence from + +?Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 has been amended since the Court's Order and privilege claims are now addressed in subsection (6) of that Rule. + +attorney William Scherer (Razorback's counsel). Although that is inaccurate, it demonstrates that any potential work-product protection has been waived by virtue of production to at least one other potentially adverse party in separate litigation. + +### C. The Truth and this Court's Process-Driven "Level Playing Field" + +This Court has repeatedly expressed its intention to preserve the integrity of the judicial process and maintain a level playing field between the parties in order to ensure '4t, rial. Now is the time for process and this balance to yield the truth. + +Consistent with this Court's efforts to level the playing fi Qwing to introduce certain evidence bearing on Epstein's criminal histo is -prosecution agreement with the government, settlements with three cl e existence and settlement of other civil claims against Epstein, this Court must a ry to review these 30 e-mails which would allow a full evaluation of IMta fa anxiety damages claim, his conduct and the true value of his clients' cases as by wards. The e-mails reveal as a sham efforts to disprove Epstein's pro or believing unusual litigation tactics were designed for an improper purp a angl eave undisputed and intact the extrinsic evidence on which r Epstein reasonably relied table cause for the original action. K ARGUMENT + +#### A. The ils are Relevant and Directly Controvert Sworn Testimony and Misrepresentations to this Court + +Th e-mails are all undeniably relevant to this case. They eviscerate damages claim and directly controvert denials under oath and repeated representations before this Court regarding the weakness of clients' damages claims against Epstein, association and interaction with Rothstein and the litigation tactics in which improperly engaged, and they destroy the overall credibility of IMt allegations against Epstein. These emails are not only relevant and material, but make it impossible for to establish any damages at all or to satisfy his heavy burden to prove the absence of probable cause for Epstein to have filed suit against him. + +claims that he has suffered and continues to suffer damages arising out of his "anxiety" from Epstein's Complaint that was filed more than eight years ago and djsmissed six years ago because it: (a) falsely characterized cases as "weak"; (b) indi knew or should have known of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme; and (c) alleged t ds engaged in litigation conduct to support the Ponzi scheme. As support for this ass i n, ards sets up as the central issues (and issue injection) in the trial of his Countercla' c al pstein: (a) the strength of his clients' cases against Epstein; (b) the lack of any t is between Rothstein and either or clients' cases against Epstei • e legitimacy of litigation conduct in his clients' cases against Epstein. ( /5t,c + +Epstein is entitled to have the C and consider these e-mails as the jury determines whether Epstein exceeded the wid ti hich the law confers on all plaintiffs "to use their best judgment in prosecuting ... a l it ithout fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for miscondu hevarria, McCalla, Raymer, & Frappier v. . 950 So. 2d 380, 384 (Fla. 7). It also crucial that these e-mails be available to the jury as they evaluate the factual that claims determine whether it was objectively reasonable or rely on the extrinsic evidence that Epstein proffers as probable cause. + +#### B. No Binger "Surprise in Fact" and Truth and Justice Requires the Courtroom's Light + +There is no Binger prejudice and truth and justice require admissibility of these 30 highly relevant, case-ending e-mails either authored or received by MI, and undeniably within possession since 2009. Based on this, — an officer of the court, who took an oath to "never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement off ct" - cannot claim "surprise."8 + +The decision before the this Court is one of right and wrong, and as this acknowledged its task - "What is right thing to do" which allows the Court to "1 mirror at the end of the day," and respond to one question: "Did I do the right thin tho ho came before me..." — regardless of economic status or popularity of either is counsel. (11/2/18 Hearing Transcript, 88-89.) wrongly placed, and on the 30 e-mails with the intent that Eps he o never discover the existence of these devastatingly harmful documents, while e s s time allowing other adversaries access to these so called "privileged" e-mails. advanced, an "attorney-client" label + +Importantly, the attome lie label is false because none of the 30 e-mails were to or from clients and none of the e- ntain confidential information provided by three clients. Further, any info lion a gut clients' past was all publicly available (and generally known) and ed about by those very clients. also knows that Jaffe agreed to p -product e-mails in 2011 and, in fact, did so, including asserted work-product emails relating to three clients' cases. hollow attorney-client privilege and work product assertions are now squarely challenged and must be rejected in favor of the truth. See Loureiro v. State, 133 So. 3d 948, 956 (Fla. 4'hDCA 2013X"A trial must be a search for the truth."); + +8Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar hups:/lwebprodfloridabanorglwpcontentiuploads/2017/04/oath-of-admission-w-the-florida-bar-ada.pdf. + +Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So. 3d 1060, 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)("...jury can the search for truth and justice be accomplished"). + +Not only are the e-mails highly relevant and constitute no Binger "surprise in fact" to as this Court has already glimpsed upon cursory review of the e-mails in March 2018, Lot a single one of the 30 e-mails are attorney-client privileged. Further, if any work p uct existed, it was either waived or is subject to a clear exception to such protection under the this Court follows ME' lead, a ruling shielding the jury from case-eviscerating ould result in reversible error and lead to a second trial. + +Because these e-mails are case-ending or worse for r , has attacked Epstein's counsel and derided the truth of these e-mails in q ) to hide them from the light of the courtroom, but in the end, there it is: truth. + +#### C. Expressly Waived Work Pr c rotection in 2011 and His Deceptive Concealment of the 30 E-Mails on a eta Deficient Privilege Log Violated Florida Law and Court Orders + +expressly, and I e occasions, waived work-product protections. In negotiating the preparation o e ilege log, on February 2, 2011, Jaffe informed Epstein's counsel and rat that it would omit from the log any work product objections that rejaC to cl sed cases: + +Gary , Jr. told the Special he would then only list on the new privilege log work product materials for ae t& cases and attorney-client privilege materials. Id. confirmed this agreement more than once: + +otk product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for luat(erials related to new or ongoing cases AND on the condition that they produced "For Attorneys' Eyes Only. (Exhibit 3.) + +[February 9, 2011] "We also have 2 more boxes that contain work product materials what we will turn over subject to the agreement that Plaintiff will not assert any privilege has been waived by turning them over now, and further subject to the agreement that they be produced 'For Attorneys' Eyes Only." (Exhibit 4.) + +[February 16, 2011] "Do you still want to do the attorney's eyes only? Do you want to speed it up or not? You'll get work-product stuff if you agree to the attorney's-eyes only." Epstein's counsel confirmed their agreement. (Exhibit 5.) + +This representation was significant. At the time made this represen n to Epstein in 2011, the three cases had been litigating against Epstein whil othstein's partner at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA") were closed and had 1 settled (in My 2010). Thus, based on representation, was obliga officer of the Court, to have produced all e-mails reflecting work product pertain e three closed Epstein cases because they did not pertain to "new or ongoing c as\. e at the time of the production had other clients who had claims agains (it, n, ose, too, have now long been settled9, and none of those claims remain pending a Eplfein. + +In fact, did produce 5,000 pages as "attorneys' eyes only" in February 2011 (including asserted work p ting to the cases of his three clients that intends to feature in the prosecution of C h i alicious prosecution claim against Epstein). Epstein has now discovered that Edw ( i st., ds di n t produce select items, and specifically withheld inculpatory e-mails pertaining to lo cases against Epstein, despite his partner's representation to counsel and the Court aster).° To the extent that the 30 e-mails identified for this Court relate to + +9Edwards settled hi nts' claims against Epstein in August 2011. + +1°In anticipation of response that some work-product documents relating to L.M. and E.W. were not produced because of some tangential privilege based on the pending Crimes Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA") action against the United States Governmen this lacks merit. None of the subject e-mails are communications between the government and clients or their counsel or implicate any issues relevant to the CVRA case. Im rtantly, other than siotice filir of Change of Address in the CVRA action in April 2009 when joined RRA, did nothing in that action while he was at RRA. In fact, the first filing made in the CVRA action after April 2009 + +actual cases litigated against Epstein, they were closed cases. If work-product protection ever even arguably applied to them, the e-mails should have been turned over for review by Epstein's counsel pursuant to Jaffe's agreement. Moreover, because all of clients' claims against Epstein have now settled, in reliance on previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, there is simply no basis for them not to be subject to review by t 's Court and a determination that any work-product protection that may at one time have '!able is no longer applicable as a result of clear and irrefutable waiver. See J o. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former c waived the workproduct privilege with respect to documents sought by Edwar ;'after having voluntarily sent allegedly privileged correspondence to the United S plea negotiations). + +Moreover, this Court's conclusion that ifs, ' aiver of any protection is further S ' mandated by his subsequent deliberate con ( c I mt the e-mails in question on a 159-page privilege log that was determined by th urt o ay 7, 2012, to be legally deficient on its face and to have utterly failed to comp! i egal requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure I .280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp. on, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). (Exhibit 7.) It was through this device th ards prevented the e-mails from ever seeing the light of day despite misrep ntatio to Epstein's counsel that all e-mails qualifying as work product in closed cases pstein had been produced. While the e-mails remained concealed through Edward oper device, continued to prosecute his Counterclaim against Epstein based on the very issues directly refuted by e-mails concealed from existence. MI, who is + +was in Se 2010 after the court administratively closed the case for inactivity — almost a year after left RRA. (See excerpt of CVRA Court Docket attached as Exhibit 6.) + +both an officer of the court, a plaintiff and counsel of record for himself in this action, should not be rewarded for such unethical gamesmanship and violation of court rules. + +On August 17, 2012, the Court vacated the May 7, 2012, Order, but did not relieve of the requirement to provide a new fully compliant privilege log. In fact, the Court's August 17, 2012, Order provides, in pertinent part: + +> shall file a written response specifically ad production sought in Paragraph 13 of EPSTEIN's Motion to I d Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in thjs-Co April 10, 2012 Order. The response shall identify non-privileged nsive documents previously produced, shall be accompanied by all nonprivileged responsive documents not previously produced, if any and shall identify, in a prover nrivileee be as referenc • th ourt's May 7, 2012 Order responsive documents withheld duction on the basis of any assertion of privilege. This respo filed within 10 days from the date of this Order. + +(August 17, 2012, Order) (emphasis added) (Exh Order and provide an accurate privilege lo clearly invalid and the protections reasons, including fai rtsadj t ply with the Court's Order. . ards failed to comply with the Court's F ruary 23, 2011 privilege log (Exhibit 9) is under must be deemed waived for any number of + +Because blat an is regarded the Court's Order, as well as the requirements of Florida's Rules of ure and the TIG case, the February 23, 2011 privilege log remains wholly defici a rse — deliberately misleading. The privilege log misstates objections, improper or altogether excludes the required identities of the document authors and recipients, d its document descriptions are deceptively vague and misrepresent the true nature of the documents listed on the privilege log. Had ever provided a legally sufficient privilege log, Epstein would have been afforded the opportunity to identify as early as February 23, 2011, the improper assertions of attorney-client privilege, work-product protection and irrelevancy made by with respect to the 30 e-mails. + +In light of promise to turn "work-product" e-mails over coupled with his deliberately misleading and non-compliant privilege log and multiple instances of waiver regarding work product from closed cases, the Court need not make any further determinations other than to unseal the 30 e-mails and allow Epstein to use them at trial. deceptive privilege log and subsequent disregard for the Court's Order mandating ("shall") a proper privilege lo should not be rewarded by this Court, and requires a finding that has waived any clat rotection, particularly protection he has already waived or lost for a variety of other ussed herein. + +#### D. Waived Any Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection by Voluntary Disclosure to a Clear Adversary in the Razorback I.itiv\_ation "esei + +Additionally, counsel conceded on March 8 c 01 that the e-mails were shared with the Conrad, Scherer law firm — counsel for Razorb \ 4k. x ' it 2, 15:1-16; 18:18-19:3). (Also see April 2011 communication between Edwa r' \* se and Razorback's counsel, Composite du ion to prove its allegations in the Razorback t Epstein, in part, to lure investors into the Ponzi uments that he claims are privileged in this case (both Exhibit 10.) Clearly, Razorback sought th lawsuit that Rothstein used the three scheme. Once provit: attorney-client and work produ Conrad, Scherer, an adversarial party's counsel, waived those privile s es. ,34 § .507, Fla. Stat.; Delap v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242, 1247 (1983). See also Tucker v te, So. 2d 1299, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("The law is clear that once communi p otected by the attorney-client privilege are voluntarily disclosed, the privilege is waived cannot be reclaimed.") (emphasis added). + +Recognizing his voluntary disclosure to Razorback, has defended against Epstein's claim of waiver by arguing "selective waiver" or "common interest." claimed that "Conrad & Scherer ... entered into a joint prosecution agreement with counsel, whereby both parties agreed to share information relative to their claims and/or defenses related to Scott + +Rothstein without waiving privilege as to their communications or documents shared." Supp. Resp. to Epstein's Mot. to Declare Relevance, July 26, 2018, at 14. This is a claim of "selective waiver"—that may waive privilege as to one recipient while maintaining it as to others. However, every court that has recently addressed the logic and viability of "selective waiver" has concluded that it fails as inconsistent with the purpose of the attorney-die t privilege. Permian Corp. v. U.S., 665 F.2d 1214, 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1981). In addition, " arty has disclosed work product to an adversary, it waives the work product to all other adversaries." McMorgan & Co. v. First Cal. Mortg. Co., 931 F. Supp . Cal. 1996). + +Case law from across the country demonstrates that the fi ality agreement is of no merit because a litigant who chooses to disclose informa d as confidential cannot have his cake and eat it too. Simply put, actions speak lo" t + +The general rule applies here. On M ; iV, Ss"0 , counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were sha with pstein's counsel by Mr. Scherer, counsel for Razorback. Thus, admi t voluntarily finished the e-mails to Mr. Scherer. Razorback sought these alle rleged communications to prove its allegations in the Razorback litigation that yin used three cases against Epstein to lure investors into en produced these documents to Mr. Scherer, who was n against Rothstein and the firm, waived his claim to attorney-client Rothstein's Ponz prosecutin privil rk-product protection as to the whole world." See infra. + +Likewise, no "common interest" protection exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly not aligned with This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- + +l 'Unless i losed the information relating to his clients without their consent, which is unfathomable, then permitted disclosure waives it on their behalf as well. + +RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: + +- "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the Epstein/LM litigation in order to lure \$13.5 million worth of my victims, my clients, into making investments in these phoney [sic] settlements." (17:7-14.) +- "In addition, as we have alleged, that Mr. and the sensational allegations in the LM case that they knew were not order to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on e with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.) +- "I can't conceive that Mr. and the predecesso w f would have any standing to prepare privilege logs or anythi Ise, given what I just told the Court. That would be like having ox rd the hen house." (20:5-9.) +- "[The Complaint] names Rothstein. names Rothstein, not the firm, a in the firm. We did not name and see whether they had in +- "I support the same to have the trustee you, rather than have them." (2 name Mr. . It just out Ilse facts and says other people se we want to see the documents ." (22:3-8.) [Epstein] has asked the Court, and that is is, get these documents and deal with it with successor law firm (i.e., law firm) to + +### (8/4/10 Hearing Transcrtp ibit 11.) + +It really i simple. decision years ago (for whatever expedient or economic reason) to o ty give away the allegedly attorney-client privileged and work product e-mails to Co erer in the Razorback litigation triggered section 90.507. After taking steps inconsistent with the maintenance of privileges in confidential information, the privileges cannot be resurrected. They were waived. + +#### E. Work-Product Protection %Vas Waived by Issue Infection + +has also waived attorney-client and work-product protections in the 30 e-mails under Florida's "at issue" doctrine (also known as "issue injection"). Related to the "at issue" doctrine is the "implied waiver" doctrine. + +The "at issue" doctrine requires that a court find a waiver of attorney-die t privilege. Genovese v. Provident Lye & Acc. Ins. Co., 74 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. 2011) (notin rivilege is waived where, for example, advice of counsel is raised as a defense and p ' ' communication is necessary to establish the defense). Under the "at issue" doctri 4 ro arty cannot hide behind the shield of privilege to prevent an opponent from AO challenging pertinent evidence." Caries Const. Inc. v. Travelers Cat. & Sur. C 6 F. Supp. 3d 1259, 1273 n.40 (S.D. Fla. 2014) (emphasis added). + +Here, the e-mails are vital and nece ( c o to efend against one or more elements of malicious prosecution claim. on ther things, the e-mails directly relate to the credibility oa claim for a on "anxiety" he has allegedly suffered every single day of his life since Decembe hen Epstein's lawsuit was filed, and continues to suffer through today. 17, 11:21-12:16; 21:14-22:8; 23:5-16.)12 In addition, the e-mails directly debunk ands' sertion that he had no involvement with Rothstein, that he acted properly in non and that there is nothing to demonstrate any weakness in nowsettled ents' cases against Epstein. Repeatedly, through his own sworn testimony and repeated misrepresentations before the Court, has made these central issues in his malicious prosecution Counterclaim against Epstein. own statements in the e-mails are directly relevant and go to the heart of Epstein's ability to demonstrate that had no + +I2Excerpts of MI November 10, 2017, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit 12. + +damages, that any damages from anxiety as claimed by cannot be blamed on the allegations in the Complaint, but are attributable to a voluntary association with Rothstein and his own litigation activities in the Epstein cases, and that in the end, a claimed reasons that Epstein could not have had probable cause and acted with malice are plainly false. Therefore, they are critical to Epstein's defenses to a malicious prosecution claim an any workproduct that may have applied to them must be deemed to have been waived. + +#### F. The Crime-Fraud Exception Applies to Some E-mails + +'Se + +Under Florida law, there is no attorney-client privilege whe e es of a lawyer are sought to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit w eZlfbnt knew was a crime or fraud. § 90.502(4Xa), Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. R. Prof! -1.6 ("A lawyer must reveal confidential information to the extent the lawyer r ' ed lieves necessary . . . to prevent a client from committing a crime."). Following Following St ent in Parrott v. Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262, (11th Cir. 1983), the Eleventh C ' the part of the district court's order determining that the crime-fraud exception d because an attorney's illegal or fraudulent conduct may, alone, overcome attom roduct protection. See Drummond Co., Inc. v. Conrad Scherer, UP, No. 2:11-c -RDP-TMP (1 1 th Cir. March 23, 2018), at 23-24. (Exhibit 13.) + +As furth port or this crime-fraud argument and Rothstein's and a working together as in Epstein's Complaint, Epstein directs the Court to his Memorandum filed under e illustrative sampling of exhibits. This is more specifically explained in Epstein's Confidential Memorandum. + +#### C. No Attorney-Client Privilege Exists + +Jaffe, and now , misleadingly and repeatedly have advanced the "attorneyclient privilege" label again and again in the hope that this Court will turn away and preclude the documents from jury consideration. Of the 1,607 claimed privilege items on Jaffe's privilege log, 938 entries were labeled as "irrelevant and not reasonably calculated t lead to the discovery of admissible evidence," while 994 entries were labeled as "work prod attorneyclient privilege" (only 19 were communications with a client as determi description in the privilege log). + +Despite and Paul Cassell's (counsel for th ery rs) protestations to the contrary, this Court can plainly see that not a single o f 0 e-mails are attorney-client privileged communications between (or SS!, co-counsel) and and Mr. Cassell's three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jang Nther, the majority of the documents are emails among attorneys and staff within qualify for that protection as codifi 30 e-mails makes it easy to client communications Cassell, and with media sources and do not n 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. A quick read of the both that the e-mails do not in any way reflect attorneyand Mr. Cassell have very significant personal and professional reas hat they do not want the e-mails to see the light of the courtroom. See Buckley v. Am. Con t do l Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 223, 119 S. Ct. 636, 657, 142 L. Ed. 2d 599 (1999 t is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."' citing Buckley v. Valeo, supra, at 67, and n. 80, 96 S.Ct. 612 (quoting L. Brandeis, Other People's Money 62 (1933)). + +Under Florida's Evidence Code, "[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such + +other person learned of the communications because they were made in the rendition of legal services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). A communication between lawyer and client is "confidential" if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than: + +- 1. Those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client. +- 2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication. + +Las Olas River House Condo. Amin, Inc. v. Lorh, LLC, 181 So. 3d 556, 55 At(Fl\4th DCA 2015); § 90.502(I)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017); Witte v. Witte, 126 So. 10 Ia. 4th DCA 2012)(second exception applies to agents of the client such as a f tuber on behalf of an incapacitated relative). Not one of the 30 e-mails provides an conclude that the documents constitute or reflect attorney-client communications i \ h ion of legal services to a client. This Court's in camera review of the 30 e-mails ly onfinn that no attorney-client privilege applies. + +#### \*LUSION + +an officer oft t. Jlle plaintiff in this case and counsel of record for himself, ive) can claim no surprise for e-mar authored, received or possessed since 2009 and deliberately and improperly co ea disclosure to Epstein since February 2011. The 30 e-mails are relevant, direc on erting M' sworn testimony and repeated misrepresentations before this Co rly none of them are attorney-client communications. Additionally, has wan, e right to assert attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine with respect to the 30 e-mails for all reasons set forth above. This Court is equipped with the controlling law and equitable principles to perform the now substantially narrowed request for an in camera review of the sealed 30 e-mails, and to confirm the critically relevant nature and admissibility of these e-mails based on the absence or waiver of any attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. The in + +camera review will confirm that expressly waived all privilege in February 2011 and such documents should be deemed to have been produced by him. As directed by this Court, a memorandum outlining Epstein's positions with respect to the specific e-mails that are the subject of this Motion is being provided to this Court separately under seal for its consideration. + +WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, moves for this Court for in camera review of the 30 e-mails, with counsel present to be heard, and for a ruling that n e e exists, or that waiver or other reasons preclude any potential protection and I:ei3 ails may be identified by Epstein on his Exhibit List and introduced at trial. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVI + +I certify that the foregoing document has been fu List below on November 9, 2018, through the Court' Judicial Administration 2316(6)(1). attorneys listed on the Service rtal pursuant to Florida Rule of + ++6s + +OCICENBACH, PA alm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 Palm Beach, Florida 33401 561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 (fax] + +By Is/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina©linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trovelinkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +#### SERVICE LIST + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J.

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J.

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

██████████ J. ██████████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████████ J.

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W., Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-D

| | + +#### EXHIBITS + +| Ex. | Date | Description | +|-----|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | 10/29/18 | In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. , U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791, Order Discharging Order to Show Cause Against Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 6508) | +| 2 | 03/08/18 | Afternoon Hearing Transcript Excerpt, pp. 15, 18, 19, 59, 61 | +| 3 | 02/02/11 | E-mail from Gary [REDACTED] to Robert Carney, Jack Scarola, Seth Lehrman, Lilly [REDACTED], [REDACTED] Ackerman and Brad [REDACTED] | +| 4 | 02/09/11 | E-mail from Gary [REDACTED] to Robert Carney, Joseph Ackerman, Lilly [REDACTED], Jack Scarola, Christopher Knight, Seth Lehrman and Brad [REDACTED] | +| 5 | 02/16/11 | Hearing Transcript Excerpt, p. 41 | +| 6 | N/A | Jane Doe v. United States , U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:08-cv-80736, Excerpt of Docket | +| 7 | 05/07/12 | Order on Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Edwards and for Sanctions | +| 8 | 08/17/12 | Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions | +| 9 | 02/23/11 | [REDACTED] Jaffe's Privilege Log | +| 10 | 04/08/11
04/10/11 | Communications between Conrad Scherer and Jack Scarola re production of documents | +| 11 | 08/04/10 | In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. , U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791, Hearing Transcript | +| 12 | 11/10/17 | Bradley J. [REDACTED] Deposition Transcript Excerpts, pp. 11-12, 21-23 | +| 13 | 03/23/18 | Drummond Company, Inc. v. Conrad & Scherer, LLP , United States Court of Appeal, Case No. 16-11090, 15-90031, Opinion | + +# **EXHIBIT 1** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_23_Picture_86.jpeg) + +**ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 29, 2018.** + +![]()Raymond B. Ray, Judge +United States Bankruptcy Court + +**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION** + +[www.flsb.uscourts.gov](http://www.flsb.uscourts.gov) + +IN RE: + +CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 + +Debtor. + +**ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +On April 20, 2018, the Court entered its Order To Show Cause Why [REDACTED] And Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held In Contempt And Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing (ECF No. 6366) ("Order to Show Cause"). On October 25, 2018, the Petitioners, [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], and Intervenor L.M., filed their Notice of Joint Voluntary Dismissal of Jeffrey Epstein (ECF No. 6496). Based upon the above, the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause against Jeffrey Epstein. + +### + +Submitted by: + +Chad P. Pugatch Es + +Rice Pugatch Storfer & =, PLLC + +101 N.E. Third Avenue, Suite 1800 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Telephone: (954) 462-8000 + +Telefax: (954) 462-4300 + +caugatch(gmrslaw.com + +Attorney Chad P. Pugatch, Esq., is directed to serve copies of this Order on all parties and file a certificate of service. co + +# **EXHIBIT 2** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +#### TRANSCRIPT 9s AiSkli\*NGS v + +DATE TAKEN: day, March 8th, 2018 TIME: p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 5 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D est Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge + +(04:c 17IIIV + +A k Nak...) This cause came on to be heard at the time and ace aforesaid, when and where the following i oceedings were reported by: + +> Elaine V. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +MR. SCAROLA: That is correct. The Conrad Scherer firm was involved in that litigation, and the Conrad Scherer firm was also interested in getting to take a look at whatever relevant e-mails might have been in the hands of the bankruptcy trustee, and then got turned over to us. + +Well, there were direct negotiatio w ich I was a personal participant with the s for Conrad Scherer, and an agreement w rgached with C) the lawyers for Conrad Schere ause, as we have told every judge before w ave appeared with regard to these matter , not attempting to hide anything. Yo t o conduct an in-camera inspection, we u to conduct an in-camera inspection c u it will confirm that we're not attemptir to, ide anything. + +wi11 turn over anything that you consider ate for us to turn over. But we have no 'ty to waive our client's attorney-client c5rivilege, your Honor, and some of these e-mails clearly contain information that originated with clients. And we are in the midst at this point of still-pending litigation, and it is important for us to protect our work product privilege as well. Some of that litigation is still ongoing right now. + +the numbers of these documents on that privilege log, you have an obligation, an ethical obligation, to turn them over to us, to turn them over now, and to make no use of those documents unless and until you have a court order that says otherwise. You need to tell us where did y u get them, when did you get them, how did yoq t em, to whom have you distributed them? Aid e are questions that we still don't have ans ered. + +What we get from the oth de is, "Well, they could have come from ey could have come from there, maybeie ame from someplace c S y else, we don't kno " . they came from t t source is clearly a proper t1v the burden in overcoming this ion to prove a waiver if they contc d any waiver existed. source, the privileg if they don't know where + +wasn't with regard to Conrad Scherer ce ase when those documents were turned over to 4. ?6, onrad Scherer -- and we have the letters that confirm the written agreement with every detail of that agreement in place -- those were turned over as part of a common interest privilege with an express representation it was attorneys' eyes only, with an express representation they would be turned + +over to no one. Indeed, when they got turned over to Conrad Scherer, they were originally turned over with a confidentiality watermark on every document. + +And then they contacted us back again and said, "We're trying to OCR all of these documents so that they are searchable, and we can't d hat with the watermark on them. Can you pl pr vide us with another copy without a waterm ' And we did that; again, trusting these of ice s of the court to abide by their agree And we have every reason to believe th t ad Scherer did. They were not the sour \ + +The obvious s isiii , e ased upon what we have been able e together, is very clearly whit s i roper retention of this material after th h een expressly ordered by the federal court not to retain any of it. now + +every representation I have made to the , everything that is included on this timeline an be established through documents that pinpoint the dates and the identity of the individuals involved and the character of every disclosure that was made and every disclosure that was withheld. It has taken a substantial effort to put all of this together again. We have been working on this + +1 2 3 4 file. How that could be the case, who knows? But I'm not finding fault with anything you or Miss Rockenbach or Miss did. That's not the issue. You've done your job. + +5 6 7 8 MR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I have one minute to confer with appellate counsel to make sure there's nothing I need to do 4'r es rve this? + +9 10 0 dr THE COURT: Absolutely. Let' Cu t take a brief recess. + +11 (Thereupon, a short as taken.) + +12 13 14 THE COURT: AgeSv 44(;:, . Thank you again. Please have a s elcome back. + +15 16 17 MR. SC Your Honor, I want to hopefully tie up a ew ose ends on the matter that has just been uled on. + +18 19 20 IZI1VI correct in understanding that the 0 e ndant is prohibited from making any use of the 24 late-disclosed exhibits? + +21 Ac?lh, THE COURT: Yes. + +22 23 24 25 MR. SCAROLA: Next, sir, we would request the defendant be required to relinquish possession of all copies of the privileged documents to the Court under seal. They have expressed some concern + +1 2 ability to weigh in somehow as to these critical issues. + +3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this C u t, to explain how and why they had access and t ese records in their possession in light court order and in light of this ongoing gation. And as a matter of respect to Mr. • ein and his ongoing legal team, to hav some type of affirmative steps to h t with this issue head on because of arent implications of same. + +15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So I a i t nt to absolute no cult with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss ampbe 1 or anyone else from the Link and ken ch firm in terms of what they did, albeit e manner in which they had to do it and the iming, unfortunately, of the matter from their perspective in having to do it, but that takes nothing away from what the Court has already remarked upon concerning the fact that now in the representation of Mr. Epstein had these records from the inception is one of the make clear that I'm finding + +# **EXHIBIT 3** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +L. Ackerman, Jr. + +From: Gary Sent Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:49 PM To: ROBERT CARNEY; Jack Scarola; Seth Lehrman; Lilly Ann M; L Ackerman, Jr.; Brad Subject RE: It's time to meet + +Judge, I apologize for the delay in replying, I was out of the office most of the day yesterday, and could not get with my partners and our clients to discuss all issues. We have now done so. We are certainly happy to meet, but maybe a conference call can accomplish the same thing. But even before that, let me lay out a proposal that I think should be acceptable to all parties. Here Is what we propose...and it essentially includes the "aye, aye" you requested, with some additional provisions. + +We will agree to prepare a revised log In which we add dates for the emails and a description of the subject matter & parties. But we will also omit from the log any work product privilege objections, subject to the following agreement. All work product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for materials related to new or ongoing cases, AND on the condition that they be produced "For Attorneys' Eves Only" such that no copies orinwes will be made of them, and Epstein will not see these documents, unless and until such time as Judge and/or Judge Ray has overruled any privilege claim (following your recommended report, or course). If the objections are sustained, the documents will be returned to us and no copies retained by iolaintiffs attorneys; if the objections are overruled and the documents otherwise deemed discoverable, /Plaintiff gets them. The Plaintiff and his attorneys will also agree that by entering into this agreement and producing these documents as described, Plaintiff will not take the position that we have waived any privilege. Thus, the only items Your Honor will have to review and make privilege determinations would be as to work product materials for existing cases, and attorney/client privilege materials. + +We should note at this point that many of the objections we have raised in the log are in fact relevancy objections. We were forced to do so to also protect privacy rights of those not a part of this case. This is due in large part to the extremely broad scope of documents produced by the Trustee. Many of these emails involve very personal matters or highly personal issues involving staff at RRA with possible relevance to the case. We can eliminate them from the log, and argue relevance issues to Judge M, which will speed things up, but only if the Plaintiff will agree to a confidentiality order to protect privacy rights. We simply cannot waive the privacy of these people, and we had no idea that such items would be included in the Trustee's production when we previously appeared before Judge Ray. If the Plaintiff feels that such a document is relevant to his case he can seek relief from the confidentiality order. + +Regarding Judge given his rtLialhis week in which he clearly indicated that while he will not Interfere with Judge Ray but that he (Judge ) will be the sole and final arbiter of discover in the case before him, including issues ofprivilege and relevance, we believe it prudent to enter art agreed order appointing Judge Carne as special in the state case, too. That way this whole process need not be repeated by another and no further time is wasted. + +We believe we can get the revised and limited privilege.log (limited to only attorney/client privilege matters, as our clients will not waive same and will not agree to the attorneys' eyes only limitation) within 7-10 days. But that should not slow the process at all at this point, since Judge Carney still needs to review all the remaining privilege claims and that will take significant time. While we are preparing the revised log, Judge + +Carney can begin his review of the privileged documents. We will then produce the revised log and the plaIntiffs counsel can then raise any objections they have, and we can have one hearing before Judge Carney on all issues before he enters his recommended order to Judge Ray. + +n + +Finally, with regard to your reviewJudge, we think that it will be an extreme Inconvenience to our firm to have to sit with you for a week or a few days while you conduct the in camera inspection. Instead, we propose that we submit a list to you in which we identify as many people as possible whose Identities or connection to the privilege claims may not be apparent, to aid you in your review. We can make ourselves available by phone if someone else comes up, or for other questions. Alternatively, you could put questioned Items in a pile and then call both sides in for any questions you have about that pile. This would greatly reduce the amount of time the attorneys have to spend sitting around while Your Honor conducts the review. While Plaintiffs counsel is being paid by the hour in this case, we are not and we can put the time spent sitting while Your Honor reviews to much more productive use. Moreover, if Plaintiff agrees to the proposal above for work product, the universe of documents in which Your Honor, needs guidance should be significantly reduced. I14/ ..) • + +I truly believe this to be a fair compromise that allows the process to procee le we revise the log, and preserves all arguments for both sides. Please advise if this is accep to y le. hank you. + +Gary M. Jr., Esq. + +Civil Justice Attorney + +Jaffe, Weissing, + +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +'Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +(954) 524-2820 + +(954) 524-2822 fax + +(954) 648-3903 cell + +hathtoiustice.com + +Save a Tree I Please consider the 1 nment before printing this e-mail. + +NOTICE:THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL IT iS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE COLLECT AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. + +From: ROBERT CARNEY [mallto:rbcamey3@gmall.com] + +Sent: Tu bruary 01, 2011 7:54 AM + +To: Gary Jack Scarola; Seth Lehrman; Lilly Ann I= L Ackerman Jr.; Brad + +Subject: is me to meet + +ONow that Judge has ruled, it is time to get down to business. According to Judge Ray's Order, the privilege log was due by the 3161, and we now have thirty days. We can debate whether the current log is in compliance with the rules or not, but the fact remains, in its present format there is no way that the Plaintiff can cull thin the list and eliminate those documents for which it has no into is creates a problem. Unfortunately, it is far more of an attorney problem than it is a Special problem. I need both sides + +present When I make'my inspection because I are going to have to have input on who is who. Because the log r --'Cannot first be tuned by the Plaintiff in its present form, this is going to be a laborious and very time consuming process, so we need to block off appropriate time now, I don't think that a full week is out ofline:Judge Ray's Order gives this phase one month.. + +I see this playing out as follows: + +- 1.. tReview of documents where privilege is claimed to see if there is any.facialleason for that claim. This means both sides being present as I go than. all 17,000 documents. Many docuinents are sent to third parties. Whether this waives the privilege depends on who the third party is and how he or she fits into the case. Where there is ne privilege, the documents-would be earmarked frit release to the Plaintiff The Plaintiff, as ntly as one of Joe's last e ontinueS under the belief that I am assisting the Defendant in preparin g. I am not. I aim the neutral ruling on log. As such, I ant not going to work with the Defendant bides are present or neither side: is present during the review. +- 2. 2. After that process, for those documents where there legitimately is a privild -hearing would be conducted to see if the privilege has been abrogated in any way; +- 3. aPreparation of a Special Report toIudge Ray outlining my + +Had the Defendant prepared a log in compliance with Tig, we een able to shorten this process. Whether there has been an appropriate privilege log and wh if any; should be imposed if there has not, can bc addressed as we proceed, but we are under a /of, 6 ukinth e limitation as of now. We need to-meet ( —Nor conference not later than Wednesday as I indicated in my laspemail. If anyone has a better idea on how to L./Netted, I am all dars,but I am not looking to extendiht: Order. We have one month, and in the absence of complete agreement by both sides, I am-not watte the requirement that both sides be present as 'I review the documents. Gs' + +# **EXHIBIT 4** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +1MI.. Ackerman, Jr. + +--From: Gary + +Sent Wednesday, Februill 2011 4:27 PM + +To: ROBERT CARNEY; L. Ackerman Jr.; Lilly Ann Jack Scarola; + +E. KNIGHT; Seth Lehrman; Brad + +Subject RE: Suggestion + +Hello all. I wanted to provide and update, and get written confirmation from the Plaintiffs counsel of the deal that was verbally agreed to on Friday and put into an email by me on Monday. I have not received any reply to my Monday email. I will resend it after this. + +But by way of update I can tell you that we have four (4) boxes of documents that are ready to be turned over now (or when we get them back from a copy center that is scanning them) under the agreement. To be specific, we have 2 boxes of documents that contain materials that we believe to be irrelevant but that implicate privacy rights of the parties or non-parties (mostly staff at the old RRA). These will be turned over subject to a confidentiality order (and that needs to be drafted, BTW), such that Plaintiff & his counsel can immediately begin reviewing same. We also have 2 more boxes that contain work product materials that we will turn over subject to the agreement that Plaintiff will not assert that any privilege has been waived by turning them over now, and further subject to the agreement that they be produced "For Attorney? Eyes Only." Should Plaintiff or his attorneys believe that a document is not confidential or l eged, that objection will be brought before Judge Carney and he will issue a recommended order to both Judges and Ray. + +We have also completed what I would estimate to be 1/5 of the revised privilege log, and are prepared to make those ocuments available Immediately for Judge Carney to begin reviewing, and we will produce that portion of the privilege log to Plaintiff as well. We estimate that the privilege log will be completed by Tuesday, perhaps earlier, but are also agreeable to a rolling production of revised log to Plaintiff and documents for review by Judge Carney, subject to the agreement. l ,4, ," + +Judge, I know that you are anxious to begirCle re and I have spoken with Brad and he just had a trial in which he was supposed to start Monday get continued. As such, he would be available to sit with you and go through the privileged items this coming Monday & Tuesday here In our office. In fact, as the log progresses we will have a constant flow of documents for you & he to review, such that you may be able to finish the review next week. + +We are attempting to move this forward as quickly as possible, and once we get written confirmation of the Agreement and draft the Confidentiality Order, Plaintiff can have at review of the 4 boxes immediately. I would also remind everyone that these 4 boxes are in addition to the 3 boxes of over 8,000 documents already produced for which our objection was withdrawn. + +Thanks. Gary + +Gary M. Jr., Esq. + +Justice Civil \*ceAttorney + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos 8 Lehrman, P.L. + +orth Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 + +iort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +', (954) 524.2820 + +(954) 5242822 fax + +Save a Tree I Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. + +NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION is ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE COLLECT AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. + +From: ROBERT CARNEY [mallto:rbcamey3@gmall.com] + +Sent' y, February 04, 2011 4:31 + +To: Ackerman Jr.; Lilly Ann Jack Scarola; E. KNIGHT; Gary Seth Lehrman; + +Subject Suggestion + +I have another suggestion for you all to ponder over the weekend. I am assuming by now that all have read Judge Order. Translated into plain English, he is saying `I don't care what you all do in bankruptcy court. I am only bound by it if I agree with it.' This puts everyone in a precarious position. Epstein's rights only come from his state court subpoena, and what he puts in evidence in state court is controlled by Judge M. not by Judge Ray. Remember, Judge Ray has no interest in the outcome of the state court litigation, no interest in what gets put into evidence in state court, and no interest in whether Epstein gets to look at the documents. He is only looking to protect the trustee. + +y e can be wasting a huge amount of time and money if the state court does not like what Judge Ray does. And the Plaintiff is not really going to be able to circumvent an adverse order by Judge by waiving Judge Ray's Order at him. + +So here is my suggestion. I have made this before and will do it a th sides request a stay from Judge Ray with a request to let Judge rule on this. It is, after all, Jud case, and it is state rules and state law that applies. And Epstein only gets into Idence what Jude says hesupt.ut in evidence. If Judge Ray agrees with transferring the Special= status to state court and Judge = approves, the Report would go iLlysIge M, and he could sign off oilAaor not. Objections to the report, if any, would be heard by Judge and not Judge Ray. Since Judge is the final arbiter, I can't sec any reason not to let him decide in the first place. The very real potential of conflicting orders is eliminated as is the potential for duplication of time and effort with two different judges on the same issue. + +I have said all along that this is a state court issue, and it is clear now that Judge agrees with that. So let it be resolved by the state court. + +I challenge either side to show any downside to this suggestion. And I challenge either side to show why there isn't a huge downside in terms of time, money, and the potential of conflicting orders by continuing as we are. + +Both sides would have to agree, but in light of Judge Order, I cannot see any reason why both sides are not already suggesting this. + +1. + +# EXHIBIT 5 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +COPY + +MEETING HELD BEFORE SPECIAL [REDACTED] R ROBERT CARNEY + +IN RE: + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL +CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +DATE TAKEN: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 +TIME: 10:05 AM - 11:15 AM +PLACE: SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Lee Lynott, Registered Merit Reporter +Registered Professional Reporter +Certified Shorthand Reporter +Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 SE 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 + +1 2 • to -- Let me see if we can cut quickly to the chase here. + +3 4 5 6 The confidentiality, can we get the confidentiality worked out so that we get something in writing so everyone is happy, in writing by next Friday at the latest? + +7 MR. ACKERMAN: That will be fine. 464 o, + +9 10 11 MRS. : The documents are go. Write up whatever you want and we'll -- e t have a problem with that. + +12 13 14. MR. : You guys h save 19,000 confidentiality orders f26ie nTother cases and you get paid by the hour to + +15 16 17 MRS. t have a problem, but we will get an order o y tomorrow and you can get the document o s y Friday, and that's done. + +18 19 20, 21 MR. Rt R: Do you still want to do the atto Is-eyes only? Do you want to speed it up or ot? ou'll get work-product stuff if you agree to the orfiey's-eyes only. + +22, MRS. : Yes. + +23 MR. KNIGHT: We need to get the ball rolling. + +24 , MR. ACKERMAN: Let's do that. + +25' MRS. : Yes. + +MR. How about this Friday? + +• + +# **EXHIBIT 6** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +REF\_SETTLEMENT,WM + +### U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM + +Doe v. United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon (Settlement) Case in other court: USCA, 13-12923-C USCA, 13-12926-C USCA, 13-12928-C Cause: no cause specified + +#### Petitioner + +Jane Doe represented by amen affe Weissing= Fistos hrman PL 5 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Email: brad©pathtojustice.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +V. + +#### Respondent + +Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil gins: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Go ent Defendant AS , + +CO + +Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA 644 Ce,sery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Email: jay®jayhowell.com PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +Paul G. Cassell Email: cassellp(glaw.utah.edu PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED + +| | | Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 30
Response/Reply (Other), Response/Reply (Other) filed by Jane Doe. Error -
Wrong Event Selected ; Correction - Redocketed by Clerk as Reply to
Response to Motion. Instruction to Filer - In the future, please select the proper
event. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 10/17/2008) | +|------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 12/05/2008 | 33 | Sealed Document. (rb) (Entered: 12/05/2008) | +| 12/05/2008 | | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 32 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj)
(Entered: 11/03/2010) | +| 12/09/2008 | 34 | Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 33 Sealed Document. Error(s): Sealed
Document Filed in Wrong Case; Correction - Original document restricted and
refiled in correct case. (rb) (Entered: 12/09/2008) | +| 12/22/2008 | 35 | AFFIDAVIT signed by : A. [REDACTED] Villafana. re 14 Affidavit, 13
Response/Reply (Other) Supplemental Declaration by United States of
America. (Attachments: # 1 Certification Certificate of Service)(Villafana, Ann
[REDACTED]) (Entered: 12/22/2008) | +| 02/12/2009 | 36 | ORDER denying 28 Motion to Unseal Document. Signed by Judge Kenneth A.
Marra on 2/12/2009. (ir) (Entered: 02/12/2009) | +| 04/09/2009 | 37 | NOTICE by Jane Doe of Change of Firm Affiliation ([REDACTED], [REDACTED])
(Entered: 04/09/2009) | +| 09/08/2010 | 38 | Administrative Order Closing Case. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
9/8/2010. (tb) (Entered: 09/09/2010) | +| 09/13/2010 | 39 | NOTICE by Jane Doe re 38 Administrative Order In Response to
Administrative Order Closing Case ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]) (Entered: 09/13/2010) | +| 10/12/2010 | 40 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for lack of prosecution. Show Cause Response
due by 10/27/2010. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 10/8/2010. (ir)
(Entered: 10/12/2010) | +| 10/27/2010 | 41 | STATUS REPORT by Jane Doe ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]) Modified to add missing
event 42 Response to Order to Show Cause on 10/28/2010 (ls). (Entered:
10/27/2010) | +| 10/27/2010 | 42 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe. (ls)(See Image at
DE # 41 ) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 10/28/2010 | 43 | Clerks Notice to Filer re 41 Status Report. Two or More Document Events
Filed as One ; ERROR - Only one event was selected by the Filer but more
than one event was applicable to the document filed. The docket entry was
corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but in the
future, the Filer must select all applicable events. (ls) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 10/28/2010 | 44 | ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on
10/28/2010. (ir) (Entered: 10/28/2010) | +| 12/17/2010 | 45 | STATUS REPORT by United States of America (Villafana, Ann [REDACTED])
(Entered: 12/17/2010) | + +# **EXHIBIT 7** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +FILED +2023 MAY - 8 PM 4:02 +PALMBEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +FILED + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM +DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS** + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant Bradley [REDACTED] and for Sanctions in the above-styled case. This Court having reviewed the Motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: The Defendant + +Bradley Edwards shall within 30 +days of the date of this orders file +a more complete privilege log. The Court +finds the privilege log is insufficient on its +face and does not comply with the requirements +of F.B.I. P. 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp v. +Johnson, 799 Suid 339 (Fla 4th DCA 2001). In + +Epstein v. Rothstein and [REDACTED] +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMB/Division AG +Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions +Page 2 of 2 + +all other respects the Motion is denied at this +DONE AND ORDERED in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida +this 7th day of April, 2012. + +*May* + +![]()Copies furnished to: + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 32401 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] Esq. +The L•S Law Firm +Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor +1441 Brickell Avenue +Miami, FL 33131 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +CERTIFIED COPY + +# **EXHIBIT 8** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE . FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 5.02009CA0408060qCXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTE J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +. .. , Ac + +e)rza mccigl izey 1-1 c) in• "ttrn mit CO •• 0 rn -TT D3 \*CI + +#### ORDER ON OUSTANDING DISCOVERY OTIONS + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considAd "'August 3, 2012, on outstanding discovery motions, and the Court having ryvt e file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGEtthatt WARDS' Motion for Clarification is GRANTED, ,/ek . s and this Court's Order of May.7, 7, ,12 is vacated without prejudice. shall file a written response specif catty addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of EPSTEIN's Motion to Comp April 10, previonaprod ced, shall be accompanied by all non-privileged responsive documents not previously produced, if any, and shall identify, in a proper privilege log as referenced in this Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege. This response shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this Order. and mend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's er. The response shall identify non-privileged responsive documents + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 17th +day of Aug, 2012. + +[Signature] +DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +NOT A CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +brad@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, FL +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire +tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com +524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-467-1223 +Fax: (954)-337-3716 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED], Esquire +lsanchez@thelsfirm.com +The L-S Law Firm +1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Phone: (305)-503-5503 +Fax: (305)-503-6801 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] + +# EXHIBIT 9 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flab.uscourts•S0v + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, + +Debtor. + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +CHAPTER II + +### PRIVILEGE LOG + +MI, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN + +Dated: February 23, 2011 + +Total of 159 pages + +Jaffe, Weissi Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 08076-08089 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez | | +| 08311-08318 | 05/26/2009 | Katherine Ezell | WPB-Confidential-General | | +| 08319-08324 | 10/16/2009 | Amy Ederi | WPB-General-Confidential | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08398 | 09/01/2009 | Kikka Claudio | C.M.A. vs. | Epstein, et | +| 08402 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | Report this as aparole violation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 08415 | 09/16/2009 | | | | +| | | Margaret Berk | Scanned document | from | +| 08422 | 08/11/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Subpoena " -directed | to the | +| 10060 | 08/03/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein-Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10069-10074 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Transcript | of Alfredo | +| 10077-10079 | 08/06/2009 | Mercedes Estrada | RE:Epstein vs. Jane Doe No.101 | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10099-10102 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10192 | 08/11/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Trump Depo moved 08/18 to | | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10194-10195 | 08/11/2009 Jacquie Johnson | Kikka Claudio | FW: Out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10264-10266 | 08/09/2009 AdahHorowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Letter | regarding | + +Jaffe W issi Fistos & Lehrma + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------| +| 10279-10291 08/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE: Epstein-Notice of production | | +| | | | | Joint w/e P | +| 10372-10373 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | rek lolnWP e | +| | | | | L- 2 | +| 10490-10493 | 09/21/2009 | Amy Fried | FW: Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10592-10593 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE: Leslie Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10604-10620 | 10/01/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:meeting w/T-fr | rter Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10639-10643 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart Mermeistein | Meeting w/LeslIe Wexner | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10700-10702 | 10/13/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10724-1073 | 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz | Joint w/P Priv. | +| 10897 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart Me:mei:dein , Leslie Wexner | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 10992-11005 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint w/p Priv. | +| 11011-11021 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11026-11032 | 07/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | commissioner | +| 11072-11074 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Possible witness | from | +| 11166-11169 | 06/23/2009 Katherine Ezell | | RE:Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Len tma n + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|--------------|------------------------|-----------------|----------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------| +| 11240-11245 | 06/22/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11248-11250 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | | Article:Bear Stearns | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11255-11259 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | USAO Chose | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 11269-11281 06/30/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | | RE:Epstein | Depo;possible | +| 711316-11319 | 06/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Discussion | about possible | +| 11332-11336 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | FW:Transcript | of Alfrefo | +| | 11340-11341 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | | | RE:Epstein vsiane Doe No.101 & | +| 11348-11358 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | REMotion | for protective | +| 11430-11434 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Edwards | Discussion | RE:Wexner | +| 11443 | 09/17/2009 | Katherine Ezell | =Edwards | Wexner served subpoena | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11541-11542 | 09/29/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Bradley | RE:Leslie Wexner & Bob | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11551-11559 | 10/01/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Meeting wStanely Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11585-11586 | 10/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | | | +| | | | | RE:Epstein;Larry | Visoski | +| | | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11675.11676 | 10/29/2009 | | | | | +| | | | | RE:Leslie Wexner attorney info | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 15981-15988 | 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Attachment:Kellen & Trump | +| 15999-16007 | 08/05/2009 | Bert Patton | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo-New York Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16057-16065 | 08/06/2009 | Mercedes | Jacquie | Trump and Maxwell Dep dates- Joint w/P Priv. | +| 15918.15949 | 08/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo's 08/14,17,18 in | +| 16066-16069 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trump, Wexner convo | +| 16095-16098 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwell,Trumo,Wexner Convo | +| 15813-15814 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | | Wexler lawyer's info Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15856 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Epstein 0epo-NY;2 Attachments Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15866-15881 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | 1 ,rs | +| | | | | PDF of | +| 15893-15901 08/03/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie Johnson | Depo &subpoena notice for | +| 15360-15363 | 09/01/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Alan Dershowitz;Harvard Law | +| | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15394-15397 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein-Deposof Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15413.15428 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Esptein-Notice of Prodcution | +| 15434-15437 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | Notice Of Production from Non | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 15454-15475 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | Critton's notice of depo;Epstein | | +| 01465 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Epstein | Joint VP Priv. | +| 15485-15492 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15493-15500 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | RE:Deposition | of 4ean Luc | +| 15501-15555 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1555645564 | 09/22/2009 | Jacquie | Margaret Berk | Epstein ()epos Y | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15565-15575 | 09/25/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa | FW:Deposition | of Jean Luc | +| 15687-15688 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Lisa | Depo of David Hart Rogers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15692-15707 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Sranley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15708-15709 | 10/06/2009 | Jacquie | Mercedes Estrada | | | +| | | | \43/ 34/ ts | | | +| 15033-15032 | 08/05/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15087-15093 | 08/06/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Mercedes | RE:Epstein-Depo for 8/17 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15094-15100 | 08/06/2009 | Jacqule Johnson | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15109-15112 | 08/10/2009 | Jacqute | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Depositions for | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer,Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards.Fistos &Lehrman + +| MI | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION, | +|------------------------|-------------|---------------|----------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 15122-15125 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE: Ms. Maxwell | Depo | +| | | | | | Joint INS | +| 15142-15158 | 08/11/2209 | | Kikka Claudio | FW:out of state subpoenas | Joid Priv. | +| 15166-15170 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:out of state subpoenas | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1.5171-15172 | 08/11/ 2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15178-15182 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie | Kilcka Claudio | RE:Epstein | V I | +| 15306-15355 | 08/25/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | FW:Epstein Depo Notices & Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14951-14952 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14954-14972 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Depo of Mark Epstein | | +| 14979-14981 08/03/2009 | | Jacquie | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein Depo-New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 14983-15015 | 08/04/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein De | 8/14.17, | +| 16501-16519 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16520-16547 | 09/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Deposition | of Jane | +| 16355-16384 | 08/24/2009 | Adam HorovAtz | Jacquie | Epstein Depo Notices and Subs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16554.16568 | 09/16/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +#### Privilege Log— -23-2011 + +#### Jaffe, Weissing. i Pistos ist Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 16574-16577 | 09/17/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | | +| 16396-16398 | 09/01/2009 | Margaret | lacquie | Alan Dershowitz | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16578-16581 09/17/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Depo | | +| 1658246585 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:DepositIon of | le L | +| 16585-16611 09/18/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16612-16439 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Pep, | Epstein Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16440 | 08/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Steam | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16740-16753 | 09/22/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 1644346452 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie Johnson | RE:E steln-De s of | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16777-16786 | 09/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16793-16794 | 10/01/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie Johnson | RE:Depo of David Hart Rogers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16462-16477 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notke of Production | | +| 16802-16823 | 10/02/2009 | Margaret Berk | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16483-16486 | 09/10/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| | | | | | Joint W/P Priv. | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer. Jaffe. Weissing,Edwards. Fistos &Lehrman + +| | | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | _ OBJECTION _DATE | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------------------------|----------------------| +| 16874-16880 | 10/13/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquia | Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16904.16905 | 10/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | JacqtTa | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 16945 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquie | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 17033-17034 | 10/26/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Jacquia | RE:Epstein depos on 10/28 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02065-02068 | 06/08/2009 | aa | Mercedes | FW:Epstein-Confirming | AT&T | +| 02070 | 09/02/2009 | Jacquiea | Spencer Kuvin | | | +| 02071 | 08/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquiea | RE:Epstein Sub to Bear Stems | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02072-02078 09/04/2009 | | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | 11.0 8,eis | o of Joint W/P Priv. | +| 03466-03468 | 05/14/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | I | REActvity in Case | 9:08-cv | +| 02301-02302 | 09/09/2009 | Paul Cassel | | FW:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 03122-03123 | 06/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley | FW: Motion to Dismiss | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 02805-02806 | 05/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Katherine Ezell | RE:WPB-Confidential-Genereal | | +| 02670-02671 10/21/2009 | | Bradley Edwards | Spencer Kuvin | FWSubpoena Info | Joint W/P My. | +| 02517-02519 | 10/02/2009 | Bradley | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | + +#### Priv I e Lo —Dated 2-23-2011 + +### \_,,Jaffe, Weissint Fistes &Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02614-02617 | 08/05/2009 | Kikka Claudio | FW:Proposal Request | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15702-15704 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | FW:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15581-15585 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Ederi | FW:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 15431-15433 | 09/10/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein-Notice of Production | | +| 15797-15798 | 10/14/2009 Spencer Kuvin | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11560-11562 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine | Jacquie FW:Meetingsv/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 11444-11448 | 09/28/2009 | Amy Eden | FW:Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05823 | 09/04/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05832 | 09/08/2009 Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05838 | 09/08/2009 Jacquie | Jack | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05847 | 09/09/2009 Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05859 | 07/23/2009 | Edwards Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05863-05864 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Dell | 1 RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05886-05887 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +| | | Jane, weissma | rings a | terwman | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------| +| | DATE | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +| 05902-05903 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05906-05907 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint WiP Priv. | +| 05912 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Arvin | RE:Epsteln | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05928-05930 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05933-05934 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | | +| | | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05936 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05938 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | | +| | | | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05940-05941 09/18/2009 | | Spencer Arvin | e RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05951 | 05/29/2009 | Spencer K | ' RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05957-05960 | 09/09/2009 | Kildckga | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05970-05971 10/21/2009 | Jacqule | MAlaret, | ric RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05982-05983 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05993-05994 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05997 | 08/06/2009 | !Mks Claudio | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jane, weissma rings a terwman + +Jane. weissing, aristos & tenrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01029 | 10/08/2009 | Carolyn | Brian Ryalls | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07707 | 09/03/2009 BradleyEdwards | Mica Claudio | RE:Regarding:CMA. vs. Epstein. | | +| 07708.07709 | 06/22/2009 | Amy Ederi | RE:Regular Monthly Cong. Call | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07734 | 07/24/2009 | | RE:Release | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 07218-07219 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine Ezell | RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06861-06863 | 05/12/2009 | Katherine Ezell | REJane Doe 11 v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06876-06879 | 05/12/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | REJane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06891-06897 | 05/12/2009 | !Catherine EzeU | REJane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint W/P Prtv. | +| 06901 | 09/11/2009 | Mercedes | Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06902 | 09/15/2009 | Mercedes | Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06903 | 09/04/2009 | Mercedes | RE: Jane Doe No.101 & Jane Doe | | +| 06806-06807 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06712 | 10/19/2009 Bradley Edwards | Kikka Claudio | RE: Igor Zinoview depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 06713-06714 | 09/15/2009 | Robert Josefberg | RE:Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | + +ehr an + +| | | DATE | TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------|--------|----------------|-----------|----------|-------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------------------|------------|------------|------| +| 06720 | -06727 | 10/14/2009 | Bradlee | | Jack | RE: | Igor Zinoview | depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06728 | | 09/09/2009 | | e | Kikka Claudio | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06711 | | 09/09/2009 | takka | Claudio | ea | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06472 | | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | e | RE:FYi | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06460 | -06464 | 05/08/2009 | ea | | Spencer Kuvin | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06455 | -06459 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | es | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06448 | -06452 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06420 | -06427 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | Me | RE:FYI | ES | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 06416 | -06419 | 05/08/2009 | Spencer | Kuvin | Edwards | RE:FYI | Epstein | Depo | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05925 | -05926 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine | Ezell | Bradley Edwards | FW:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05883 | -05584 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine | Ezeli | | RE:Epstein | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 05022 | -05025 | 09/10/2010 | 1 Adam | Horowitz | Jaccluie | RE:Epstein | | -Notice of Production | | | | +| | | | | | | from | Non Parties | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| 04724 | -04725 | 05/27/2009 | Bradley | Edwards | Katherine Ezell | RE:Epstein | | Cases -depostions | in | | | +| | | | | | | federal | cases | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | W/P | Priv | +| | | DATE | iO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | +| 06990 | -07002 | 0 6 / 1 1/2009 | Brad | | Katherine W Ezell | June | 10 | th hearing | -WPB  | | | +| | | | | | | | | | Joint | -privilege | | +| 07003 | -07006 | 06/26/2009 | Amy | Edell | Brad | June | 25 | th hearing | -WPB Joint | -privilege | | + +#### Pith/Ileke Log — Dated 2-23-2011 + +### Jaffe, Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | | | Confidential | | +| 07030 | 09/22/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | L.M. v. Epstein – defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's response to plantiff | Joint-privilege | +| 07090-07091 | 9/29/2009 | ██████████ | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07092 | 10/29/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 07093 | 09/17/2009 | ██████████ | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01484 | 05/21/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | C. ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01503 | 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01517 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz; Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01514 | 08/26/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01515 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01477 | 07/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz; Stuart Mermelstein | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01489 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07110-07112 | 09/25/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | | +| 07113-07114 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ██████████ J. ██████████ | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07115-07116 | 09/25/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | LM v EPSTEIN hearing 9/22/09 | Joint-privilege | +| 07145-07146 | 09/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz | ██████████ J. ██████████ | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 07211-07213 | 10/01/2009 | ██████████ | J. Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07210 | 10/06/2009 | Stuart Mermelstein; Robert Josefsberg | C. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer.Jaffe.Weissing,Edwards. Mins&LehrmaD + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | J. [REDACTED] | | | | +| 07214-07215 | 10/01/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | C. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07216-07217 | 10/02/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07220-07223 | 10/01/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07224-07225 | 10/02/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07226-07227 | 10/01/2009 | Robert Josefsberg | C. Spencer Kuvin | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07228-07229 | 10/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Robert Josefsberg | C. Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 07280-07283 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Motion for protective order | Joint-privilege | +| 07633-07634 | 08/06/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 07710-07733 | 06/23/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Regularly Monthly Cong. Call | Joint-privilege | +| 07740-07746 | 09/18/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 07748-07757 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 07913-07915 | 08/27/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] | Joint-privilege | +| 07917-07918 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Joint-privilege | +| 07965-07966 | 08/12/2009 | Katherine W. Ezell | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Subpoena directed to the investigators | Joint-privilege | +| 07977-07978 | 10/09/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 01716 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Elizabeth Villar | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations INVOICE | Joint-privilege | +| 01768 | 07/13/2009 | Richard Willits | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01771-01772 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Epstein Investigator | Joint-privilege | +| 01931 | 08/11/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Lisa | Alfredo Rodriguez | Joint-privilege | + +... a i . \_ • Jane. weissine. rstos & Lennnart + +| | DATE | TO | | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------|---------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| 01998.01999 | 09/21/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Margaret Berk | Correct Number — Epstein | +| 02021 | 05/14/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02044 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine W. | | | +| | | | J. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — | +| | 09/04/2009 | Robert C. | Joint-privilege 02048 | | +| | | | BradleyJ. | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein - | +| 02054 | 05/12/2009 1 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley1. | Emailing Epstein deposition | +| 02062 | 10/05/2009 | J. | Amy Ederi | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| | | | | In Tel. Conf. for Monday, | +| 02087 | 09/17/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | A | Epstein- Hearing Joint-privilege | +| 02140 | 08/04/2009 | S,enter Kuvin | BradleyJ. | Epstein Depo — New York Joint-privilege | +| 02147-02149 | 09/21/2009 | J. | Amy Ederi | Epstein Depo Joint-privilege | +| 02174 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | BradleyJ. | Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of | +| 02209-02210 | 07/01/2009 | Bert Patton | William J. Berger | Epstein v. State of Florida — | +| 02215.02217 | 07/24/2009 | J. | Mercedes | C. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02290 | 09/18/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02355-02356 | 06/10/2009 | Mercedes C. | Susan K. Stirling | Hearing taken on 06/10/09 | +| 02362-02363 | 06/09/2009 | Kuvin | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege | +| | 09/15/2009 | Jack | .I. | Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege | + +**J. Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 02420-02421 | 05/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Mercedes | C. Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02435 | 09/15/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Lisa | Jane Does v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 02438 | 09/18/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DC# W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 02462 | 09/22/09 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | L.M. v. Epstein - Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plantiff L.M.'s Motion for Protective Order | Joint-privilege | +| 02476-02477 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | LM v EPSTEIN hearing | Joint-privilege | +| 02516 | 10/06/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02554-02559 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | NEW ASSIGNMENT - NEW ALBANY - RUSH? - Fwd: Federal Subpoena | Joint-privilege | +| 02584 | 08/11/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Out of state subpoenas | Joint-privilege | +| 02618 | 08/04/2009 | [REDACTED] | J. Kikka M. Claudio | Proposal Request | Joint-privilege | +| 02627-02628 | 09/18/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | J. Adam Horowitz | Report this as a parole violation | Joint-privilege | +| 02672-02673 | 10/09/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Subpoena Info | Joint-privilege | +| 02727 | 08/03/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 02896 | 06/08/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | J. Spencer Kuvin | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 03009-03010 | 08/07/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Motion to stay | Joint-privilege | +| 03028-03029 | 09/21/2009 | Bradley Edwards | J. Adam Horowitz | Mark Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 03038 | 10/06/2009 | Bradley Edwards | J. Stuart Mermelstein | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 03131-03132 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Bradley J. [REDACTED] | Epsteins assets | Joint-privilege | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer. Jaffe, Weissin Edwards.Fistos&Leh n + +| | DATE TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------------|---------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| 03243-03244 | 09/09/2009 1 | J. | Adam Horowitz | EPSTEIN Joint-privilege | +| 03397-03400 | 09/29/2009 Adam Horowitz | | .I. | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | +| 03407-03414 | 09/29/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- | +| 03451-03452 | 05/14/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893- | +| 03477-03479 | 05/15/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893- | +| 03619-03627 | 09/15/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | BB v. Epsteln/EW v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 03631-03633 | 09/15/2009 | la • tile | William J. Berger | BB v.12E_tein/EW v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 03646-03656 | 10/19/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | BIM M Subpoena & Depo | +| 03677-03687 | 07/08/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Can you send me those | +| 03719-03736 | 09/04/2009 | J. | Spencer Kuvin | CMA — depo notices attached. Joint-privilege | +| 03840-03847 | 08/02/2009 | Stuart | | | +| | | | J. | Continuing Deposition of Alfredo | +| 03938-03939 | 09/29/2011 | Katherine W. | | | +| | | | J. | Deposition of Bill Joint-privilege | +| 03943-03945 | 09/18/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | | +| 02911-02912 | 09/15/2009 | J. | | Joint-privilege | +| 02939 | 07/14/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jane Does 2-7 v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 02977 | 10/16/2009 | Katherine W. | El | Leslie Wexner Joint-privilege | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer.Jaffe. Weissing.Edwards.Fistos& Lehrman + +| M | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | , OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|---------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------| +| 02978 | 10/29/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelstein | Leslie Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 02994 | 06/10/2009 | | | | | +| | | | 1 ag | | | +| | | | es | C Preservation of evidence | Joint-privilege | +| 07060 | 10/16/2009 | Sid | | | | +| | | | Bradley .1 | LM. v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| | | | Bradley). | Scheduling various depositions | | +| 06202 | 07/13/2009 | | | | Joint-privilege | +| 06409-06415 | 04/15/2009 | | 1 Katherine W. Ezell | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06428-06447 | 05/06/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06453-06454 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | FYI | Joint-privilege , | +| 06465-06471 04/15/2009 | | Katherine | W. | | | +| | | | Bradley). | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06476-06490 | 05/08/2009 | | J. Spencer Kuvin | FYI | Joint-privilege | +| 06630-06632 | 09/09/2009 | S encer Kuvin | J. | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06636-06639 | 09/09/2009 | | 1 Robert | C. | | +| | | | | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 06702-06705 | 09/16/2009 | | J. Kiklca M. Claudio | Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola | | +| 06706-06708 | 10/14/2009 | | J. Kildo M. Claudio | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06715-06719 | 10/09/2009 | Jack P. | Braille | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06729-06735 | 10/13/2009 | | 17 lack P. | Igor Zinoview depo | Joint-privilege | +| 06763 | 08/19/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelstein | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06764.06766 | 09/10/2009 | | J. Stuart Mermelsteln | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06770-06781 09/10/2009 | | Stuart | | | | +| | | | J. | IME's | Joint-privilege | +| 06811-06812 | 08/20/2009 | Katherine | W. Bradley). | Is Mark Epstein JE's brother? | Joint-privilege | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------| +| 06817-06819 | 09/23/2009 | Adam Horowitz | =J. | Is your client being deposed | | +| 06820-06822 | 07/02/2009 | J. | Margaret Berk | Jane Doe 2 IM | v. Epstein Joint-privilege | +| 06841.06860 | 05/12/2009 | L | Spencer Kuvin | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Int-privilege | +| 06864-06875 | 05/12/2009 | S ncer Kuvin | J. | Jane Doe II v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06880-06890 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Jane Doe 0 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06898-06900 | 05/12/2009 | J. | Stuart Mermeistein | Jane Doe II v. Epstein,- | Joint-privilege | +| 06933-06934 | 07/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz | J. | lane Does 2-7 v. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 06937-06938 | 10/05/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Jane Does 2-8 v. Epstein — Cross | | +| 06944-06952 | 09/22/2009 | J. | Adam Horowitz | Jeffrey Epstein DC# W35755 | Joint-privilege | +| 16107 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| 16123-16124 | 08/11/2009 | Oka M. Claudio | Jacquie | Maxwells deposition | Joint-privilege | +| | 16799-16801 10/02/2009 | Robert C. | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 02947-02948 | 08/03/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquie | Epstein Depo — New York | Joint-privilege | +| 02891-20906 | 10/01/2009 | 1. | Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 20880-20882 | 10/02/2009 | | 1. Katherine W. Ezell | Meeting with Stanley Arkin | Joint-privilege | +| 06042-06090 | 07/02/2009 | William 1. Berger | Spencer Kuvin | Ew 09-22784 cert.4i4 | do Joint-privilege | +| 06402-06403 | 06/10/2009 | J. | Katherine W. Ezell | Hearing to Un-seal | Joint-privilege | +| 01365-01366 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint-privilege | +| | 01340-01341 07/30/2009 | Adam Horowitz | la - tile | Epstein Depositions | Joint-privilege | +| 01331 | 06/30/2009 | Stuart | E | Epstein depositions | Joint-privilege | + +IM, Jaffe. Weissing. IIIIIMIJMg re Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|------------------|----|--------------------------------|-----------------| +| 01319 | 08/11/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01316 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | | Epstein Depo | Joint-privilege | +| 01314 | 10/30/2009 | Stuart | | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | | Epstein Depo of Wexner | Joint-privilege | +| 01298 | 05/26/2009 | | J. Adam Horowitz | | Epstein cases — depositions in | | +| 01294 | 08/10/2009 | Jack P. | J. | | Epstein Assets | Joint-privilege | +| 01273 | 07/13/2009 | Katherine | W. | | | | +| | | | Bradley J. | | Epstein 2255 claims | Joint-privilege | +| 01250 | 05/13/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01246 | 04/08/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C. | Epstein —Telephone Conference | Joint-privilege | +| 01233.01234 | 07/31/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C | Epstein — Monday, 8/3/09 — | | +| | | | | | Monthly call in telephone | | +| | | | | | (877) 468-2136 — participant | | +| 01224 | 06/16/2009 | | J. Mercedes^. | C | Epstein — Monday, 8/3/09 — | | +| | | | | | Monthly call in telephone | | +| | | | | | (877) 468-2136 — participant | | +| 01185 | 10/30/2009 | | 1. Mercedes | C. | Epstein — Confirming AT&T dial | | +| 01186 | 10/02/2009 | | 1. Mercedes | C | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | | in Tel. Conf. for Monday, | | +| 01187 | 05/19/2009 | | 1 Mercedes | C | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | | +| | | | | | in Telephone Conference for | | + +### Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jane, weissing, towarcis, ristos a MUIR-TIM] + +| a | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 01188 | 05/12/2009 | | J. Mercedes | C. | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| 01189 | 09/08/2009 | | J. 'liana Yarzabal | | Epstein — Confirming AT&T Dial | +| | | | | In Telephone | Conference for | +| | | | | Wednesda | 9/9/09 at 300 | +| 01095-01096 | 04/15/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | J. | | Deposition of Epstein was set for | +| 01045 | 07/23/2009 | | J. Richard Willits | CMA vs. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01649 | 07/08/2009 | | J. Me des | C. Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01641 | 06/11/2009 | I | | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01639 | 05/29/2009 | | J. MEM | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01619 | 10/28/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01660 | 07/22/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01666 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | ( J. | Epstein | Joint-pit/Hew | +| 01671 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine | W. | | | +| | | | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 01680 | 08/24/2009 | Jack P. | J. | Epstein | Joint-privilege | +| 04355-04358 | 09/04/2009 | Jack Scarola | J. | Epst in — D | s of | +| 04446 | 09/03/2009 | | J. Mane Yarzabal | Epstein — | Monday 8/3/09 - | +| | | | | Monthly | Call in Telephone | +| | 04200-04201 09/04/2009 | | Katherine W. EzeA | Letter from Bob Clifton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| | 09/04/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 0422204223 | 09/04/2009 | I I | Barry | Letter from Bob Critton | Joint W/P Privilep | + +Jaffe. Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|-----------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------| +| | I | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 04298-04299 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | Depo of Epstein | Joint W/P Privilege | +| 04304 09/08/2009 | la uie | Adam Horowitz | Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04335 10/30/2009 | | Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Confirming AT&T Tel. | | +| 04359-04360 09/04/2009 | Jacquie | Katherine Ezell | JCS of & | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 09/15/2009 | Ja ule | Adam Horowitz | _ 04365 Epstein- Depo in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04417 09/17/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein- Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04423.04424 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | Letter regarding Leslie Weimer | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04433-04436 06/16/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Monthly Call in Tele. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | Jac. tile | Mercedes | Monthly Call in Tel, Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | | Jack Scarola | Epstein- Tel. Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04518 04/08/2009 | I | Robert Josefsberg | Epstein- Tel Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04524.04525 05/13/2009 | Katherine Ezell | I | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04580 10/14/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoskl | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04640-04641 10/14/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Depo of Larry Visoski | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04723 05/26/2009 | | Katherine Ezell | Epstein cases- Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04726-04729 05/26/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Epstein cases- Witness depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04750-04754 08/04/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Epstein depo- New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04763.04785 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Epstein Depo Notice | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04797-04799 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04806-04813 07/28/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | Adam Horowitz | Epstein Depos in New York | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04819 07/30/2009 | Jack Scarola | Jacqule | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04831-04832 07/30/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Jacquine | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04835-04836 07/25/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe, WeissMe. Ma FIStOS a Mormon + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------|-----------------|--------------------------------|-------------------| +| 04711 | 08/10/2009 | | Jack . | Epstein assests | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04855-04858 | 08/18/2009 | | Kikka Claudio | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04861 | 07/24/2009 | Lisa | Jacquie | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04876-04877 | 07/27/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04922-04923 | 09/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04925-04926 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04929-04934 | 09/25/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04937-04938 | 09/15/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Epstein Hearing | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 04969-04972 | 07/20/2009 | Adam Horowitz | | Alfredo Rodriguez Depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05026-05027 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Notice of Production from Non | | +| 05031 | 09/25/2009 | | Spencer Kuehl | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05037-05038 | 09/25/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein Order | 1 Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05042-05043 | 09/25/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05046 | 09/25/2009 | | Spener Kuvin | Epstein Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05074-05076 | 08/18/2009 | Stuart | | | | +| | | | Jacquie | Epstein Sub. To Bears Stem | Joint W/P Priv. | + +### Jane, weissing, ristos & Lenrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------| +| 05100-05102 | 08/05/2009 | Mercedes | Improper Serving of Maxwell | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05105.05107 | O4/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Hearing on Yellow Cab Objection | | +| 05110 | 08/06/2009 | Adam Horowitz Kikka Claudio | Address for | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05118-05119 | 09/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion for Protective Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05157-05158 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion for ProtectiveOrder | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05167-05168 | 05/29/2009 | Margaret Berk | Spencer Cross-Examination | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05171-05172 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Transcripts | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05201-05202 | 09/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Rules on Doe no. 4 | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05222.05223 | 07/10/2009 | Katherine Ezell | File case | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05226 | 07/10/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Epstein 5hAmendment rights | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05229 | 07/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motions to Compel | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05232.05233 | 07/10/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motions fully briefed | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05247 | 07/23/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | | +| | | | Answers to the 1" set of ROGS | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05251-05252 | 07/24/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Depo dates | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05258 | 07/25/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | | +| 05265-05266 | 07/22/2009 | Adam Horowitz Spencer Kuvin | Alfredo Rodriguez depo | Joint W/P Priv. | + +M, Jaffe, Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------| +| 05286-05287 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Switzerland Witness regarding | | +| 05293-05294 | 07/28/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Calling Switzerland witness | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05326-05327 | 08/24/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Emails searchable | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05331 | 08/06/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | Epstein address | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05334-05335 | 05/29/2009 | | Mercedes | TV Interview that is too explicit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05347 | 08/24/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking Computers | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05350 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | Current address for | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05353-05354 | 09/09/2009 | Katherine Ezell | | Distribution of Costs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05367 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | Edwards | Volcemall | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05373-05374 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Edwards | Supoenas for depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05391-05393 | 04/20/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Bradley Edwards | Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05400-05401 10/19/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Bradley | Religious Dildo Washer | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05414-05415 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | | current address | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05437-05439 | 04/20/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Yellow Cab stuff | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05444-05445 | 08/10/2009 | Bradley | Kikka Claudio | Setting Depos | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05451 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe. WeissinJT. Fis os 8 Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION r--• | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------| +| 05469 | 07/08/2009 | Mercedes | Judge Marra's July 6th | Order Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05476-05494 | 07/08/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | NPA from | Villafana Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05546 | 08/03/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05579-05581 08/24/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Seeking all of Plaintiff's | | +| 05613-05618 | 09/18/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Non-Pros Agreement' | | +| | | | N | / | +| 05633 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Motion rofreese assets | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05638-05639 | 10/28/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | DalialloWebs | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05647 | 07/09/2009 | Adam Horowitz Katherine Ezell | NPA under seal for in camera | | +| 05656 | 08/10/2009 | Kikka Claudio | Supoenas for depo | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05659 | 08/27/2009 | Spencer Kuvin | Order | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05668 | 10/16/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Florida Science Foundation | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05705 | 09/09/2009 | Mercedes Kikka Claudio | Video tape of Epstein | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05724 | 05/29/2009 | Jack Scarola | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05727 | 05/29/2009 | Edwards Sid | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| | 05730-05731 08/14/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacqule | Motion for Status Conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | +| 05734 | 05/29/2009 | Adam Horowitz Jacquie | Motion for status conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|------------| +| 05737 | 08/12/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacqule | NPNP and sub to Palm Beach | | | +| 05750 | 05/29/2009 | Mercedes | Spencer Kuvin | Motion for status conf. | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05770 | 07/08/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | NPA in camera review | *iloint W/P Priv. | | +| 05774-05776 | 09/04/2009 | Katherine Ezell | Jacquie | being reseffalvied | | | +| | | | | 1-\ 7 | | | +| 05782-05783 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Motion to appoint commissioner | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05788-05790 | 07/09/2009 | | Spencer Kuvin | Notice and serve everyone | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05802 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie | Bill being split up evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05806 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie | Spencer Kuvin | | | | +| 05822 | 09/04/2009 | Adam Horowitz | Jacquie Johnson | Bill will be sprit evenly | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05814 | 08/03/2009 | | Adam Horowitz | Haley's affidavit | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 05818-05819 | 09/09/2009 | | Robert Josefsberg | CMA Order | Joint W/P Priv. | | +| 01781 | 05/01/2009 | | William Berger | Epstein Depo | Work Product;attorney | client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of | admissible | +| 07619 | 07/13/2009 | PatkCassell | | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attomey | client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of | admissible | + +mil l Jane. weissing. rastos at Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03181 09/14/2009 William Berger Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 03182.03185 07/14/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| ") | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00042 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| | | | evidence;protected by privacy rights | | i | +| 0043 05/05 | | | | | | +| Edwards Susan Sterling Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00044 08/17/2009 Paul Cassell litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +**Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00045 | 05/01/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00046 | 05/01/2009 | | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00047-00049 | 05/01/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00050 | 05/05/2009 | | Adler | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00051 | 05/05/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00052 | 05/05/2009 | | Adler | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00053 | 05/05/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00054 | 05/05/2009 | | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lenrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00055 04/29/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00056 05/05/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00057 05/05/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00058 05/05/2009 Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00059 05/05/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| t a`t | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00060 05/05/2009 Adler) Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00061-0064 05/06/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00065 05/12/2009 Bradley Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00066 04/29/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +**Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00067 | 05/12/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00068 | 05/12/2009 | | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00069-00070 | 05/13/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00071 | 05/13/2009 | | Rob Buschel | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00072 | 05/15/2009 | | Susan Sterling | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00073 | 05/15/2009 | | Russell Adler | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00074 | 05/18/2009 | Bradley | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights | +| 00075 | 05/18/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to | + +Jaffe- ►W**eissinJT. Fistos & Lehrman** + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| O0076 05/18/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00077 04/04/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00078 05/18/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00079 05/19/2009 Rob Buschel LitigationStrategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00080 05/19/2009 Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work | | | Prod uct;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00081-00082 05/20/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00083-00085 05/21/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 0O086-00087 05/25/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe. Weissin \_Fistos& Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00088 04/30/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00089 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00090 05/28/2009 William Berger Litigation Strat | | | | | | +| ( 4\ 31 | | | | | | +| Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00091 05/28/2009 Paul Cassell ic | | | | | | +| Utigat tegy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00092 05/28/2099 Rob Buschell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00093 06/01/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00094-00095 06/23/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| I I | | | | | | +| 00096 07/06/2009 Bradley William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Productattorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +| Jane. weiSsing. ristos & Lenrman | | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +| 00097 07/06/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00098.00100 07/07/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00101 07/09/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00102.00106 07/09/2009 Paul Cassell Utigatley Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00107 07/10/2009 William Berger litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00108 07/10/2009 Paul I | | | | | | +| I PS | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00109 07/10/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Produa;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00110 07/10/2009 rds Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00111 07/11/2009 William Berger Utigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | _ 0BJECNON | | | | I | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------|-----------|----|------------| +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | | | | | | +| lead evidence;protected by privacy rights -I | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00112-00120 05/012009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| | t | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00121 05/12/2009 William Berger - Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00122 05/12/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Work | | Product;attomey | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00123 05/12/2009 William Berger | | | | | | +| No Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead j, | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00124.00125 05/12/2009 Willie Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00126 05/22/2009 Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | Product attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00127 05/26/2009 Bra lee William Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | Product;attorney | | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE [TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| 00128.00131 5/26/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00132 5/21/2009 William Berger litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00133 06/23/2009 Paul Cassell litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00134 06/03/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| lec \ NSi i t i | | | | | | +| Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00135.00137 06/03/2009 Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| .71< e) | | | | | | +| Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00138-00140 06/08/2009 Williarn Berger Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00141 06/12/2009 ROb Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00142 06/13/2009 Bradley Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00143-00145 06/15/2009 Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +#### Lo — Dated + +e Weissin Fist s &Lehrman + +| DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----|------------------|----|------------| +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 06/29/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | | | | | | +| Cpridirk | | | Product;attorney | | diem | +| | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00147 06/29/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00148 04/22/2009 Rob Buschel | | | | | | +| _I ts , | | | | | | +| Litigatio rat; | | | | | | +| Work | | | Productattomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00149 04/26/2009 Adler | | | | | | +| do Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00150 04/24/2009 Litigation Team Rob B I litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 00151-00152 06/26/2009 iiterscheI Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attomey | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 01036-01039 04/26/2009 Suss n Adler Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | +| lead | to | the | discovery | of | admissible | +| 13313-13314 07/30/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Litigation Strategy Work | | | Product;attorney | | client | + +=Sarn I + +| ME | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of admissible | +| 13315 | 08/03/3009 | Denis Kleinfeld | Beth Williamson | Litigation Strategy | Work Productattorney client | +| | | | | | lead to the discovery of admissible | +| 01080-01081 06/22/2009 | | Robert C. Buschel | J. | Jane Doe brother | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01077 | 05/28/2009 | Robert C. Buschel | J. | Doe family member | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02445-02446 | 05/05/2009 | J. | Susan K. Stirling | -= v. Atlantic asphalt | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03049 | 09/21/2009 | J. | D.F. | New addition to the case | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02425-02426 | 06/17/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | J. | Jane Doe v. Dukenik | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02669 | 09/24/2009 | J. | Jacquie | Subpoena for | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02647 | 08/06/2009 | Mike Fisten | J. | Samantha Lee info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03688-03691 04/03/2009 | | Robin T. | | | | +| | | | J. | Case number assignments | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03692-03693 | 05/06/2009 | J. | Susan K. Stifling | Case list | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 15678-15680 | 09/29/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Subpoena for | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 15689 | 10/01/2009 | Jacquie Ell | 1. | Client information | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02546-02547 | 09/22/2009 | D.F. | J. | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02809-02810 | 09/28/2009 | N.R. | J. | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02262 | 07/23/2009 | Jacquie | J. | Discussion re: client/victim | | +| 02807-02808 | 10/01/2009 | N.R. | El | Client communication | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03760-03828 | 04/01/2009 | MIA Personnel | RRA personnel | Client names/types of action/ | | +| 03759 | 04/01/2009 | Adler | J. | Conflict Check for Brad | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08358-08359 | 09/14/2009 | Pat | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | + +#### Privile e Lo — 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe. Weissing, FiStOS & Lehrman + +| MB | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|-------------------|-------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 08364-08368 | 10/01/2009 | Jac ui | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08370 | 09/14/2009 | J. | Pa | Client info | Attomey/ClIent privilege and/or work product | +| 08374-08375 | 10/01/2009 | J. | Jacqula | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 03878 | 06/12/2009 | J. | Robert C. Buschel | Curt | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02955 | 04/20/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | 1. | JuskowIch | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02932 | 07/17/2009 | Christina Fitch | 1. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 11544.11545 | 09/28/2009 | Jacquie | 1. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07432-07435 | 09/25/2009 | D.F. | J. | New addition to the case | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06906-06909 | 07/17/2009 | Christina Fitch | J. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06913-06914 | 06/22/2009 | J. | Susan K. Stirling | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06030-06031 05/04/2009 | | Susan K. Stirling | 1 | Espina —Waimea case | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05646 | 07/08/2009 | J. | William J. Berger | Client meeting | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05573 | 09/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | J. | Client meeting | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05540 | 07/31/2009 | Amy Swan | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05273-05276 | 07/28/2009 | Amy Swan | J. | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 05264 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | 1 | Client info | Attomey/Oient privilege and/or work product | +| 05267-05270 | 07/27/2009 | Am Swan | 1 | Client info | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02933 | 06/17/2009 | J. | M. G. | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01292 | 09/18/2009 | J. | M.G. | Epstein article | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01068-01070 | 04/02/2009 | All Staff | Robin T. Kempner | Current case list of Brad | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01054-01055 | 04/02/2009 | All Staff | Robin T. Kempner | si case list for Brad | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01033 | 05/06/2009 | Susan K. Stirling | 1.11M | case list | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01030-01031 04/03/2009 | | J. | Robin T. Kempner | Case number assignments | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|-------------|--------------|----|---------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 01118-01120 | 09/22/2009 | | J. | MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01986-01989 | 04/02/2009 | | J. | Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 01984.01985 | 04/02/2009 | | J. | Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attomey/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 25925 | 09/30/2009 | All Staff | | Robin T. Kempner | Conflict check | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 25874 | 09/30/2009 | All Staff | | Robin T. Kempner | Additional name wed to | | +| 08356-08357 | 09/16/2009 | | | NR | Client Meetin | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| | | I | | Jacquie | New ClIefita\ | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08005 | | | | MG | New Caere | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06915-06920 | 06/17/2009 | MG | | | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08360-08363 | 09/16/2009 | NR | | I | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 04101-04107 | 09/28/2009 | | | MG | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 04708-04710 | 09/18/2009 | I | | MG | Epstein Article | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06910-06912 | 06/17/2009 | MG | | I | Jane Doe v. Roe | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07909 | 08/10/2009 | Jane Doe | | I | Same silver car tag | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 07637-07642 | 09/10/2009 | | | NR | NR Interview | Attorney/ Client Privilege | +| 06795-06799 | 08/19/2009 | Anthony P | | | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06542-06548 | 09/15/2009 | | | Pat | Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 06404-06408 | 09/10/2009 | | | Pat | NR Interview | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08338-08339 | 09/16/2009 | | | NR | New Client | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 08505 | 09/14/2009 | Nit | | I | New Client Meeting | Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product | +| 02241-02242 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02243-02244 | 07/07/2009 | | | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02238.02240 | 05/28/20009 | | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02204 | 07/14/2009 | | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jaffe Weissina, Fistos & Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION i | +|-------------|------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| 02298.02299 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02291 | 06/04/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information RE: | +| | | | Epstein Molestations | li. | +| 02442-02443 | 08/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 02440-02441 10/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 04318-04321 09/24/2009 | Confidential | | | +| 05111 | 06/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Providi | esses W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05152 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing | w Witnesses W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05164 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05166 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05169-05170 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05173-05174 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05212.05213 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential 14 Source | | | +| | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Secret Plea | Deal of Epstein | +| 05175.05189 | 07/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05194-05196 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +#### Pri ile e Lo — ted 2-23-2011 + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05227.05228 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05230-05231 07/08/2009 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05303 | 08/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05344-05346 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05408 | 07/06/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05425-05429 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy , | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05433.05436 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05433-05436 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05446 | 07/07/2009 | | Confidential Source | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05452-05464 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05535-05536 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 05538-05539 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05550-05551 08/11/2009 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05577-05578 | 08/22/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05619-05620 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05650 | 08/06/200 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05688-05689 | 0/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05693-05695 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | WI? Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05698 | 08/21/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | WI? Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05706.05709 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05720-05721 05/29/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05738-05739 | 05/29/2009 Bradley | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05743-05745 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | litigatirStrateflY | | +| 05754 | 08/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05759-05762 | 06/01/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05765-05768 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | w/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05771-05773 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| | | | | w/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05777-05779 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| 05784-05786 | 06/03/2009 | Edwards Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05791-05794 | 06/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | +| 05803 | 07/22/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05836-05837 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | w/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05842-05843 | 07/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-----------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 05848 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05852-05853 | 07/29/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05857-05858 | 07/31/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05952.05953 | 08/25/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06192-06197 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 06198-06201 06/24/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Secret Plea Deal For Ey= | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06203 | 07/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06401 | 09/23/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 06643-06651 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06788-06789 | 09/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06942.06943 | 09/26/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Additional | Information RE: | +| 06953 | 08/14/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06955-06957 | 10/02/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 06959.06961 08/11/2009 | Edwards Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06963-06980 | 08/11/2009 | Edwards Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06986-06989 | 10/03/2009 | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07010-07014 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jane weissin: risto at Lenrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 07017-07018 | 09/04/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07143-07144 | 10/01/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07147-07150 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 10/13/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07605-07615 | 09/07/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07646-07647 | 09/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07674-07697 | 09/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08376 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08380 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08427-08430 | 09/24/2009 | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08450 | 05/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 08507 | 10/03/2009 | Confidential Source | litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 10092.10098 | 08/31/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01610 | 06/03/3009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01612 | 06/04/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01451-01458 | 05/27/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 01608 | 07/03/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01606 | 07/02/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01510 | 08/25/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01506 | 08/24/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Other Rape Victims | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01493 | 08/10/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01488 | 08/03/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01486 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing NewWitnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01483 | 07/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 01479 | 07/22/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01449 | 05/22/2009 | | Confdentf rce | | | +| | | | | Secret Plea Deal for Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01433 | 10/20/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information RE: | | +| 15207-15208 | 08/14/2009 | Jacquie | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 19716-19719 | 09/25/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 19730-19731 10/02/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01683 | 08/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01693 | 08/21/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03011 | 09/17/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information RE: | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +Jane, vveassing. rustos tsr Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 01755-01756 | 10/02/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 01756 | 06/22/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 01770 | 10/08/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03126 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 02006 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02060 | 09/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03487-03494 | 09/19/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02269 | 08/26/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Other Rape Victims | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02322-02323 | 10/16/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02595-02596 | 09/07/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02866-02867 | 09/25/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02895 | 08/31/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 02901 | 09/16/2009 | Confide I | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03032 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | 10/13/2009 | Bradley | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 03070 | 07/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +=Jaffe Weissing. Fistos &Lehrman + +#### Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------| +| 03081-03082 | 09/21/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| | | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 03144 | 10/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| 03189-03190 | 10/14/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE( | | +| | | | | Epstein Strategies , | \ | | +| O4015 | 09/08/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses Ic14.....„ / | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02913 | 09/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02956-02957 | 08/31/2009 | | Confidential Source | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02975 | 10/21/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | LitigatiOn Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04031.04055 | 08/12/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 04057 | 08/11/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04060 | 08/12/2009 | | Confidential Source | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02979-02980 | 10/02/2009 | | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: | | +| 02998 | 07/21/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05626 | 10/12/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05630-05631 10/12/2009 | | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05664-05665 | 10/12/2009 | Bradley | Confidential Source | litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 07976 | 08/14/2009 | Confidential | | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 06655 | 06/09/2009 | Confidential | | Litigation Strategy | | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | + +### • Jane, weissing, towarus, riSIOS at Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| | | Source | | | discovery of admissible evidence | +| 19986-19987 | 09/28/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Mike Fisten | Additional Information RE: | | +| 04905-04906 | 07/15/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 04946-04951 | 10/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | lW/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05148 | 05/22/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05151 | 05/26/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05161 | 05/28/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation St | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05203 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05207-05208 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05220-05221 06/23/2009 | | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05224-05225 | 06/24/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Edwards | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05239 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05277-05278 | 06/23/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05324-05325 | 06/23/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05368-05369 | 06/23/2009 | Edwards | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 05387-05388 | 06/23/2009 | | Confidential Source | Secret Plea Deal For Epstein | W/P Priv.; not reasonably calculated to lead to | +| 02811-02812 | 10/03/2009 | ff | Confidential Source | Additional Information RE: | | + +Jaffe, Welssine.MM Fistos lit Lenrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 01280-01288 | 09/18/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 01131-01134 | 10/08/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| | | | | | to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 00988 | 04/25/2009 | Confidential Source | | Providing New Witnesses | ctytoV/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10163-10167 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential Source | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10181-10188 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential Source | Providing Ne | itne | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| | 10245-10251 09/08/2009 | Confidential Source | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10364-10367 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| | 10586-10591 09/24/2009 | Confidential Souse% | | | | +| | | | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10625-10632 | 10/02/2009 | Confidential Sosrcel | | | | +| | | | \..i ) | | | +| | | | , Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10698-10699 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10718-10719 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential Source | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10927-10937 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10945-10954 | 05/29/2009 | Bradley Confidential Source | | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 10964-10978 | 06/02/2009 | Bradley Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 10991 | 06/22/2009 | Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: | +| 11006-11010 | 06/23/2009 I | I Confidential Source | Additional | Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | + +, Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards, Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11075-11076 | 07/29/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11080-11082 | 07/31/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11085-11097 | 09/04/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11123-11136 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11140-11142 | 10/04/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11150-11151 | 10/12/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 10390-10393 | 09/19/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11157-11165 | 10/25/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Providing New Witnesses | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11170-11174 | 06/23/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11184-11185 | 05/27/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| 11188-11195 | 05/28/2009 | Confidential Source | Bradley Edwards | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11198-11200 | 05/28/2009 | ██████████ | Confidential Source | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11208-11214 | 05/29/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Additional Information | RE: W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11223-11236 | 06/01/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11260-11266 | 06/24/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | +| | | | | Epstein Molestations | | +| 11320-11325 | 07/30/2009 | Confidential Source | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. | + +#### Privilege Log — 2-23-2011 + +sane, weissing, rims a Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 11372-11373 | 08/11/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 11380-11383 | 08/12/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 11438.11442 | 09/17/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Additional Information RE: | | +| 11549-11550 | 10/01/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | +| 11574-11579 | 10/13/2009 | Confidential | | | +| | | | Litigation Strategy | W/P Privilege; Not reasonably calculated to lead | + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 08029-08032 | 09/14/2009 | [REDACTED] | Tami Wolfe | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08026-08028 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07738-07739 | 05/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07747 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07758-07759 | 05/05/2009 | Jonathan Birkman | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +Jane. weissing. FISLOS ISE Lenrman + +| a | PATE | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBIEgl0/4 | +|-------------|------------|--------------|------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 07760-07765 | 09/11/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07766 | 10/11/2009 | iacquie | Attorneys at RBA | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07767-07784 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07785-07790 | 06/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07791 | 04/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07792-07793 | 04/01/2009 | Bradley | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | .;7 ‘ | | | | +| 07794-07841 | 04/04/2009 | Paul cassell | v | Full draft of motion to stay | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07842-07848 | 06/16/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe, WeiSSin g. risios ai Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 07849-07852 | 04/10/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07853-07856 | 06/10/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07857-07862 | 09/11/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07863-07864 | 06/10/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07685-07874 | 05/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07875-07876 | 04/14/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07877-07884 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07886-07888 | 08/02/2009 | Cara Holmes | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +a, Jane, weissme, ga, ristos 6t tenrmun + +| | lI #1, 1 | M | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 07889-07892 | 05/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07893-07904 | 07/27/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07905-07908 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie | | litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07910-07912 | 08/10/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Litigat ra | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07916 | 10/16/2009 | Jacquie | Edwa | Lid ' n Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 07919 | 08/27/2009 | Jacquie | | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 07920-07930 | 10/18/2009 | Paul Cassell - | | litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | Wiiliarn Berger | | litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 05355-05357 | 09/09/2009 | Adler | I | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +iarre. weissing. i linos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05375-05378 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] Edward | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05372 | 04/20/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05380-05381 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05384-05385 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05348 | 09/15/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05341 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05329-05330 | 04/09/2009 | Beth Williamson | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05332-05333 | 05/20/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| DATE TO FRAM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 05320-05323 07/30/2009 Amy Swan Litigation Strategy | | +| not | reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 05312-05313 07/22/2009 Nora Batian Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 05306-05307 07/22/2009 Nom Batian litigation Stratec | | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 05302 07/22/2009 Attorney at RRA kit S e | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 05281 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Review of litigation materials | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 05282.05283 04/09/2009 Beth Williamson Jane Doe v. Us | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 05288-05291 07/22/2009 Bradley Edwards William Berger Dr. Swan | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably | calculated to lead to the | +| 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane, weissing. Fistos a Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 05295-05297 | 07/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Priscilla Nascimento | RE: Epstein Conference Room Reserved | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05298 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Discussion of Epstein strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05261 | 07/23/2009 | Amy Swan | ██████████ | Victim Psychological Assessment | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18358-18359 | 07/24/2009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04431-04432 | 08/14/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ Edwards | RE: Epstein-Maxwell Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04419-04420 | 04/09/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | RICO Statement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04403-04416 | 10/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Punitive Damages | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04387-04402 | 08/19/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Victim Complaints, Forensic accountants, & Epstein's Fraudulent Transfers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01082 | 09/02/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Subpoenas for Epstein's Housekeepers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04363 | 09/14/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | LM | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04343-04344 | 09/04/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04340-04342 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04339 | 09/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 00989 | 09/04/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | William Berger | Alessi Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04325-04328 | 07/30/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | RE: Epstein- beneficiaries & response to asset freeze motion | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 00155 | 06/25/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | 20 Cases & Bond | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04312-04313 | 05/26/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | RE: Epstein Accounting; Freezing | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane, Weissing. FiStOS & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Assets | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04314-04317 | 09/11/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | RE: Epstein- Add to our motion for a protective order * | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04307-04308 | 04/08/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Motion to stay-response & motion to unseal Fed Civil Case | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04309-04311 | 05/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Epstein Assets & Forensic Accounting | | +| 04295 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | thoughts on Epstein's Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04305-04306 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Motion to Strike references to the NPA & Revised response to the motion to stay | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04274-04276 | 05/06/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Sandy Berger Telephone call | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18334-18336 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | ██████████ | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04216-04219 | 09/08/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | State Judge ordered no contact with any underage girl | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +### Privilefte Loft—Dated 2-23-2011 + +, Jaffe, WeissIng. tistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 04202-04206 | 09/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | William Berger | Epstein's attorneys & Bob Josephsberg have filed several motions on limits of the no contact order | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04207-04215 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04191-04193 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | William Berger | Finding out who is protected by the order | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04194-04195 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | Seek Court Intervention | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04196-04199 | 09/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | William Berger | Finding out who is protected by the order | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25937 | 10/25/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Ken Jenne | Epstein's house staff | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25923 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Maribel Matiska | legal opinion RE: Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25832-25838 | 06/01/2009 | [REDACTED] | William Berger | contact information re: who is pertinent to the case | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25825-25826 | 10/05/2009 | [REDACTED] | William Berger | Trial Prep Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | In FRQM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 19649-19651 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Investigation into | Epstein's | +| 19658-19661 | 08/03/3009 | Ken Jenne | Copperfield Depo | | +| 25809-25810 | 10/04/2009 | William Berger | Trail Prep | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; irrelevant and | +| 04466-04469 | 08/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | p nA ts Subpoena | | +| | | | | discove ry of admissible evidence; protected by | +| 01296 | 10/02/2009 | Mike fisten MIcha | .r.) Subpoena of Detective Recarey | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 04439-0442 | 09/16/2009 | Paul Cassell | RE: Epstein-Notice Of IME | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 04445 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie | RE:Epstein | Reminder-Mon | +| | | | 8/3/09-Monthly | Call in | +| 04425-04428 | 09/18/2009 | | | | +| | | Paul Cassell | Jane Doe Depo Set for the 30th- | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane WelsSIO: ristos • Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04429 | 10/07/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Motion for Sanctions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25770-25772 | 10/05/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Victims for Trial | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 25768-25769 | 10/05/2009 | ██████████ | William Berger | Victims for Trial | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26716-26717 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | Ken Jenne | NR as a victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26714-26715 | 10/13/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ██████████ Adler | Trial date procured | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 20907-20908 | 10/05/2009 | ██████████ | William Berger | Victims for Trial | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19857-19860 | 10/17/2009 | Mike Fisten | Pat ██████████ | Epstein's Palm Beach Property | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19861-19862 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Larry Visoski Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by | + +affe, Weissing. Fistos & Lehrma + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 19713-19715 | 09/09/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Copperfield Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19720-19729 | 09/30/2009 | Mike Fisten | Jacquie ██████████ | Tentative Subpoena dates and people list | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19706-19707 | 09/09/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Dershowitz Subpoena ready to be signed | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19693-19695 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19696-19697 | 09/04/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ | Setting Up Depo Times | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19698-19700 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Investigation in Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19685-19688 | 08/27/2009 | ██████████ | Ken Jenne | RE: Witness information that we need to use | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19689-19690 | 09/02/2009 | Mike Fisten | Jacquie ██████████ | Awaiting dates for the 2 other pilots, Dershowitz & Copperfield | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jane, vveissme. ristos at Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19691-19692 | 09/02/2009 | Mike Fisten | Pat ██████ | Bill ██████ Subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19673-19674 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Depo List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19654-19655 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ ██████ | Setting Up Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19656-19657 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ ██████ | List of people to subpoena | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19662-19663 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████ ██████ | Setting Up Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19652-19653 | 08/26/2009 | Jacquie ██████ | ██████ ██████ | Witness information that we need to use | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18348-18349 | 08/27/2009 | ██████ ██████ | Ken Jenne | RE: Witnesses information that we need to use | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04272 | 06/30/2009 | William Berger | ██████ ██████ | Investigation into Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 19683-19684 | 08/19/2009 | Mike Fisten | Pat ██████ | Potential New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +### 1\_ sane. weissing. tawaras. tistos a tenrman + +| all | DAM | IQ | FROM DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 19856 | 10/17/2009 | Mike Fisten | Mike Fisten Investigation | into | Epstein's | +| 20888 | 09/12/2009 | Adler | | Potential New witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 20946 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Investigation | into | Epstein's | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 05807-05810 | 07/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Priscila | | | +| | | | | Conference room reserved | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 05262-05263 | 07/22/2009 | | Jacquie | Investigator information | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 25829 | 05/11/2O09 | | VVilllam Berger | Motion to unseal criminal records | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 25830-25831 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | | | +| | | | — Investigation | into | Epstein's | +| 25811-25813 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Investigation | into | Epstein's | + +Jane Weissin : istos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | 12 FRO, | i , . ;I a • | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 25815-25822 | 06/01/2009 | William Berger | Depo information | r W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 18358.18359 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Investigation into | Epstein's | +| | | | iN | j | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 05382 | 09/12/2009 | Mike Fisten | Potential new | else Y W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 08033-08070 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | h RE: Causes of | | +| 25997 | 10/23/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Legal Research | RE: causes of | +| 26741-26763 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Legal Research RE: causes of | | +| 25774-25777 | 05/12/2009 | Susan Stirling | Filed Motions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +#### 1... Jaffe, Weissing. S Fistos Kt Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 18174-18176 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Mike Fisten | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18172-18173 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18170 | 08/24/2009 | ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Epstein Probation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03106 | 06/03/3009 | ██████████ | Shawn Gilbert | Epstein Case Info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02593-02594 | 05/13/2009 | ██████████ | Shawn Gilbert | Discussion with secretary regarding client information | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08014 | Undated | Unknown Staff | ██████████ | Miscellaneous case info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 27494 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fistos | Legal Research RE: Causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18166-18167 | 08/04/2009 | Bradley ██████████ | Mike Fisten | Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe, W issin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | pEscrorrioN | OBJECTION, | +|-------------|------------|-------------|-------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 18164-18165 | 08/03/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Copperfield Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the, | +| 18771.18773 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Legal Research RE: causes o | | +| 18742-18744 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Dershowitz Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 18737-18741 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Depot a | | +| 20263.20282 | 10/14/2009 | Pat | Ronald Wise | Vehicle Registrations-Visoski | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 20219-20262 | 10/14/2009 | Pat | Ro | | | +| | | | | Visoski Research & Questions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 17225.17230 | 07/22/2009 | | Jecquie | Wayne Black Retainer | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | IC | | | privacy rights | +| 17038-17040 | 10/29/2009 | Circfloknis | Jacq ule | RE: Subpoenas for Epstein's | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 16916-16928 | 10/19/2009 | I | Jacquie | Witness List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +| IIII | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| 16795-16796 | 10/01/2009 | — - | Jacquie | Trump Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 16455-16759 | 09.10/2009 | | Jacquie am | Depo Dates | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 16436-16437 | 09/09/2009 | | Jacquie | Dershowi | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 16400.16404 | 09/02/2009 | mike Fisten | Jacquie | ' n into Epstein's | | +| 16394-16395 | 08/31/2009 | | Jacqui | Depo Dates | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01046 | 08/25/2009 | Cara | | Computer information | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | ?C‘S" | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01048-01050 | 07/28/2010 | WO Berger | | Hard drive of Plaintiffs computer | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01052 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Maribel Matiska | legal Opinion RE: Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe, Weissing, FiStOS & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01100 | 10/19/2009 | Adler | Adler | Dershowitz Involvement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01105 | 08/11/2009 | Adler | Alan Garten | Potential New Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01111 | 05/13/2009 | Adler | Paul Cassell | Legal research | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01112-01117 | 05/12/2009 | Adler | William Berger | Dr. Swan | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01139-01142 | 04/29/2009 | Staff | Adler | Epstein Depo revised | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01151 | 09/11/2009 | Beth Williamson | Adler | Motion for protective order final draft | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01167 | 09/11/2009 | Bradley Edwards | Jacquie | Epstein MPO | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01216 | 05/21/2009 | Adler | William Berger | Immunity for testimony about prostitution | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by | + +#### Prlyilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011 + +am Jane. wetssing, ristos at Lenrrnart + +| | RAIZ Ts | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|----------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 01247 | 09/30/2009 | Jacquie | Therapy Notes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01268-01269 | 10/22/2009 | Marc Nurik | Epstein meeting | ilik/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01293 | 08/19/2009 | Ken Jenne | Epstein Assets AS | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01299 | 04/21/2009 | Carolyn | Or de | rig the motion to | +| | | | g t nsfer | | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01305 | 08/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | Ed *tein Computers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not seasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01313 | 09/02/2009 | Attorneys at RRA Jacqu | son Epstein Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01333 | 08/03/3009 | Jacqule | Epstein Depo | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| | | \C— ) | | privacy rights | +| 01335 | 08/03/2009 — I | -Olsten | Investigation into Epstein planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +### Jaffe, Weissingi Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 01337 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Depo list | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01363 | 09/08/2009 | Ken Jenne | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Motion to freeze assets | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01414-01416 | 98/18/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
& Ken Jenne | Mike Fisten | Epstein Potential Witness List | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01417 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Potential Witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01429 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein telephone conference today | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01431 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Bradley [REDACTED] | Epstein case info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01432 | 09/15/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Pat [REDACTED] | New Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01434 | 10/19/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Evidence | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01461 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Info | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------|-------------|------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01466 | 07/31/20009 | William Berger | Epstein Presentation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01471 | 07/18/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigation into | Epstein's | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01480 | 07/22/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Epstein Me %sr | | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01482 | 07/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | Invettion into Epstein planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01491 | 08/10/2009 | Ken Jenne | i s Investigative fees | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01492 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | The Mar-a-Lago Club Depo | w/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01495 | 08/11/2009 | Marc Nurik | Potential Witness | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01498 | 08/17/2009 | Marc Nurik | legal opinion re:Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | 20z | IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------|-------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01502 | 08/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Epstein Evidence | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01513 | 08/25/2009 | Jacquie | | Discovery for the glrls | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01522 | 08/14/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Lepl opinio4 | ) | | +| 01522 | 10/08/2009 | Ken Jenne | | New Victim | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01523-01524 | 10/26/2009 | Marc Null( | | Edwards HMeeting on Epstein | | w/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01527 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | i | New Victim | | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01540 | 05/01/2009 | William Berger | | | | | +| | | \ — | | | | | +| | | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01553 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie Johnson | Letter from JP | Chase | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | + +ds L Jane, weissing. PISCOS a Lehrman + +| | RATE | TO FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|--------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01566 | 05/11/2009 | Wayne Black | New Victim | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01586 | 05/26/2009 | Paul Cassell | Opposition to the continuance of | | +| 15690-15691 | 10/01/2009 | lacquie | Trump Depo | c | +| 01607 | 10/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litl • n tegy on motions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01621 | 04/19/2009 | Marc Nurik | ential New Witness | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01622 | 06/09/2009 | Susan Stirling | Bradl Eddrards Important phone call due today | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01624 | 06/11/2009 | Robert Buschel | Motion for bond asset transfer | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01627 | 05/06/2009 - traey | | Marc Nurik Dateline interest into epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane. Weissing. FIStOS & Lenrman + +| | DATE | T.S2 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01628 | 06/15/2009 | Robert Buschel | | Investigations | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01635 | 05/21/2009 | | Carolyn | Personal Conversation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01636 | 06/23/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Motion to unseal | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01638 | 06/29/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigatio tegy RE: Motion to | | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01644 | 07/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | Edward | equ for admission | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01646 | 07/06/2009 | Confidential | | | | +| | | | | Secret Plea deal for Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01648 | 07/11/2009 | Wayne Bla | | | | +| | | | | Investigating Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01650 | 07/13/2009 | Cad Linder | | | | +| | | | | Epstein's Assets | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01658-01659 | 07/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | | DOJ | | + +**J. Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | +|-------|------------|--------------|-------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01663 | 07/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Epstein's cars | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01668 | 07/29/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | ██████████ number | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01764 | 07/31/2009 | ██████████ | Carolyn | Case Numbers | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01676 | 10/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Motions | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01681 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Edwards | Positing regarding litigation preparation | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01682 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | ██████████ | Litigation Strategy-Order 242 | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01684 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie | ██████████ | Plaintiff firms the notices of depos | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | | +| 01686 | 09/11/2009 | Mike Fisten | ██████████ | Potential new witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the | | + +aJaffe, Weissing, ME, Fistos /A Lenrman + +| | DATE | 1.2 | FROM | _DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------|-------------|-----------------|---------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 01692 | 09/12/2009 | William Berger | | Proposal for settlement | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01698 | 05/05/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein Victim Depos | | +| 01702 | 09/17/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein Depok | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| | 05/14/2009 | William Berger | | Statutory Rape | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01711 | 04/101/2009 | Carolyn | | | | +| | | | | Third party subs | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| 01737 | 07/14/2009 | Richard Wolfe | | | | +| | | | Bradley | Facebook/Myspace | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | 05/11/2009 | Attorpeys at MA | | Investigation Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| | | | | | not reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 01603 | 10/15/2009 | | | | | +| | | | Adam Horowitz | Testimony RE: Vehicles | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane welssin rostos & Lenrman + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|---------------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | privacy rights | +| 01742 | 10/12/2009 | Beth Williamson | ██████████ | Filing fee check | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01743 | 10/29/2009 | Beth Williamson & Jacquie | ██████████ | New folder for Jane Doe Created | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01745 | 10/15/2009 | ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Epstein's Cars | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05726 | 08/14/2009 | ██████████ | William Berger | Legal opinion | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 27395 | 08/13/2009 | Marc Nurik | Scot Rothstein | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 26356 | 08/13/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Russell Adler | Legal Research RE: causes of action against Epstein | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04225 | 06/15/2009 | ██████████ Edwards | Wayne Black | Epstein Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04229-04233 | 06/16/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Epstein secret plea deal with Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe. Weissins. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 04237-04242 | 06/15/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Epstein secret plea deal with Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04246 | 06/15/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Epstein secret plea deal for Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04250 | 06/15/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Epstein Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04255-04256 | 06/15/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Epstein secret plea deal for Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04260 | 06/15/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Epstein secret plea deal for Bear Stearns | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04523 | 05/14/2009 | ██████████ | Wayne Black | Investigating Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05088-05090 | 10/27/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Epstein's assets | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05108 | 04/01/2009 | Bradley Edwards | Carolyn ██████████ | Victims employment | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe, WeissMR. Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05145 | 05/21/2009 | █ █ | Carolyn █ | Epstein Hearing | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05237 | 07/20/2009 | Wayne Black | █ █ | Investigating Epstein's planes | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02648-02650 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie █ | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02651 | 07/29/2009 | █ █ | Wayne Black | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02661-02662 | 05/12/2009 | █ Adler | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02674-02677 | 08/18/2009 | Jacquie █ | Bradley █ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02678-02679 | 04/10/2009 | █ Adler | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02682-02683 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie Johnson | █ █ | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02718-02720 | 06/25/2009 | █ █ | Seth Lehman | Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +Jane, weissing. FIStOS 1St Lenrman + +| fAlg DATE TO EB9B1 DESCRIPTION fRIJECTION | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02728.02729 08/04/2009 Spencer Kuvin Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02746 07/22/2009 Adam Steinberg Litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02813-02814 08/26/2009 Pat Providing s | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02817-02826 08/04/2009 William Berger | | +| S L | | +| ti n trategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02827-02832 05/12/2009 Attorneys n RRA Willie C R) ) Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02833-02835 08/23/2009 1 7 t Ptilfaz i Other Rape Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02874-02876 05/23/2009 + Br , , William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02887-02888 08/26/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +### Privilexe Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jane, WeISSMR, PISCOS et Lenrman + +| DATE LI FROM PESCRIPTION MOO | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 028894)2890 10/14/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02891 10/12/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02892 08/03/2009 William Berger Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02894 09/09/2009 Mike Flsten Litigation Strategy | | +| ( Y | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 02899 09/29/2009 Paul Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03001-03002 05/15/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03003 04/15/2009 Paul Cassell | | +| \-- — | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03004 06/23/2009 W4rne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +Jane. Weissme. Fistos & Lenrman + +| DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OplgTION. | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03005.03006 08/03/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03007 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| of reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03008 04/23/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strat | | +| S gy e | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03013 05/25/2009 Litt | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03014 10/08/2009 Cam a 441kI tion | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03017-03018 08/18/2009 Mike Fisten Providing New witnesses | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| privacy rights | | +| 03019 09/19/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +Jane, weissing, ristos at Lenrman + +| IMI art RF OM `DESCRIPTION ocuEcooN | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03020 09/16/2009 .IIIIII Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03021-03027 09/19/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03031-03034 09/18/2009 Pat Litigation Strategy | | +| . 4,•.. / | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03035 09/29/2009 Adler Litigatioolbjtteel, | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03039 06/05/2009 Paul Cassell igation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03040 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Willie Berg r litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03044 09/09/2009 Edwards Jacquie Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03045-03047 09/30/2009 Bradley Edwards | | +| Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03048 04/21/2009 Paul Cassell Susan Stirling Litiation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | + +### Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman + +| fl MTh M FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECT'S:IN | I | +|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03050-03052 10/16/2009 el Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03053 10/17/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03054 10/13/2009 Attorneys at MA Grant Litigation S | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03056 09/04/2009 t | | +| Mike Fisten 6t Ra Victims | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03072 06/22/2009 Way Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03073 09/01/2009 t ikiliFisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| ? S | | +| 03074-03075 10/28/2009 Jacq ti lill | | +| Michael Wheeler Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03100 10/15/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +=II Jane. weissIng. Eistos a Lenrman + +| gag IQ FROM DESCRIPTION 001EfTION | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| Privacy rights | | +| 03102-03103 07/21/2009 Paul Cassell Other Rape Victims | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03107-03113 07/24/2009 Paul Cassell litigation Strategy | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03114 08/04/2009 Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03115-03118 05/16/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03124 06/23/2009 Wayne Back / | | +| titigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03125 09/08/2009 William Berger | | +| Bradley Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03127-03128 05/19/2009 SusanStlIng | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03135-03136 08/04/2009 Mike Flsten Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +illigJaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lenrman + +| ATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 08/22/2009 Wayne Black Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03138 10/08/2009 Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy | | +| | reasonably calculated to lead to the | +| 03145 10/30/2009 Jacquie Litigation Strate | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03146 08/22/2009 Wayne Black Litiga, | | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03147-03154 10/07/2009 Beth Willia n | | +| c oil | | +| litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03155-03155 10/08/2009 lacqu Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03158-3159 04/28/2009 Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03191-03196 10/14/2009 -Tableissell | | +| Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | + +# Privilege Log --Laltcl 2-23-2011 + +| DATE /5/ F astral OBJECTI9N | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| 03197-03199 08/14/2009 Attorneys at RRA Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03205-03211 09/13/2009 Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03212 08/11/2009 Jacquie I Litigation Strategy | W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and | +| not reasonably calculated to | lead to the | +| 03213 10/28/2009 Paul Cassell Litigatio t A).- | | +| Be in J. Berger - Strategy | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | irrelevant and | not | reasonably calculated to lead | +| 08423-08425 10/09/2009 Bradley | | | | | | +| J. Mike Fisten | Subpoena info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08426 08/10/2009 J. Mike Fisten | Synopsis | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer,Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman + +| DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION, | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------------------| +| 08A41-08446 10/05/2009 Attorneys at MA William J. Berger Trial Prep Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06/26/2009 Wayne Black Brunel information Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08/05/2009 Paul Cassell Cf. Response to Motion to File | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03737 08/25/2009 Cara Computers Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03746-03753 08/02/2009 William Beige/ :Computers Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02335-02338 05/08/2009 William Berger Bradley litigation strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02360-02361 06/09/2009 SusanStirling Hearing to Unseal- Criminal Plea | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | to the discovery | of | the admissible evidence; | +| 02368-02373 10/14/2009 Jacquie illi Igor Zinoview depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Welssina. FIStO5 ist Len an + +| | DATE | IQ | FROM DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02376-02392 | 10/14/2009 | Mike Fis-ten | Igor Zinoview depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02401-02410 | 05/08/2009 | William Berger | Jane Doe li v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02414-02419 | 05/12/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jane Doe II v. Ep | 'n | | | | +| | | | ‘ 4\1 | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03669-03670 | 10/08/2009 | Carolyn | Epste | arrest m onitor | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02288-02289 | O5/26/2009 | Susan Stirling | Motion date | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02292-02293 | 05/19/2009 | Dr. | Pimp and His Game | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02304-02308 | 09/17/2009 | | Jacquie Forensics/Investigations | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02313-02316 | 07/01/2009 | | William Berger Confidential Agreement | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissint tistos at Lenrman + +| | DATE | M | FR | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION _ | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|-------------------------------|----------|-------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 02331.02334 | 0S/08/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Caton order Transcript | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02173 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Juan Alessi | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02187 | 07/26/2009 | | Wayne Black | Epstein matter | I | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02195-02197 | 09/17/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Order N " | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02199.02203 | 09/18/2009 | Jacquie | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 02211-02214 | 07/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Epstein v. State of | Florida | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02224 | 07/28/2009 | Jacqule | | Witness of Epstein rapes from | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 10787-10799 | 10/19/2009 | | Jacquie | Witness List | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 1090140902 | 05/11/2009 | | William Berger | RICO Enterprise | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privile e — Dat 2-23-2011 + +a Jaffe.Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| BATES | DATE | m | FROM 1 | DESCRIPTION | OWECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 10904-10905 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10908-10909 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Enterprise ^ | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10912-10913 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | RICO Entke‘ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10955-10963 | 06/01/2009 | | William Berger | 'Pia itness list | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10979-10981 | 06/03/2009 | | Wayne) | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11022-11025 | 06/26/2009 | | Wayne Black | Info on 2 MC2 Workers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11036-11037 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Serve Subpoenas | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11039-11071 | 07/21/2009 | | Wayne Black | Retainer from the Firm | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +eJaffe, weissoz, Fistos a Lenrman + +| | PAD | 12 FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 11083-11084 | 09/04/2009 | | | | | | | +| | | Attorneys at RRA | Witness info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11105-11110 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie | Disseminate letter from Wexner | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11137.11139 | 10/03/2009 | Paul Cassell | Zorro Trust resat c 'in o - | | | | | +| | | | K -‘, -A N \ ‘,7- | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11143-11146 | 10/04/2009 | William Berger | 1 Discovery Cutoff | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 1115541156 | 10/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ew Property | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11175-11183 | 04/27/2009 | Marc Nurik | Epstein Case Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11196-11197 | 05/28/2009 | SusanStfling v | | | | | | +| | | | Jail Visitors | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11205-11207 | 05/28/2009 | Patil Cassell | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +**Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | protected by privacy rights | +| 11215 | 06/01/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Activity in Case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11238-11239 | 06/03/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Depo Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11246-11247 | 06/22/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein Article | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11251-11254 | 06/23/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Info on 2 MC2 workers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11267-11268 | 06/30/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] Edwards | Witness List revised | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11282-11315 | 07/18/2009 | Wayne Black | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11326-11331 | 08/03/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Donald Trump depo | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11337-11339 | 08/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +**Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 11359-11362 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein depos | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11366-11371 | 08/11/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Trump depo info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11377-11379 | 08/12/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Issuing Subpoenas | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11390-11395 | 08/17/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Witness depos | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11400-11415 | 08/18/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Subpoenas for pilots | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11420-11426 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Serving Alan Dershowitz | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11428-11429 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Witness info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11568 | 10/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Meeting with Leslie Wexner | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11587 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Visoski Depo | Work product; attorney/client privilege; | + +**Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman** + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11861-11865 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11870-11871 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Epstein info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11874 | 08/24/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Confidential info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11876 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 11967-11972 | 10/29/2009 | Cara [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Subpoenas for Epstein's Attorneys | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08072-08075 | 07/22/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Total counts for E.W. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08090-08091 | 10/05/2009 | William Berger | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Trial Prep | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08114-08117 | 08/18/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Updated Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | + +Jaffe, WeIssing..M., Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08157-08159 | 06/03/2009 | █ █ | █ █ | Vanity Fair | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 08499-08501 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | █ █ | Witness List | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10063-10068 | 08/03/2009 | █ █ | Mike Fisten | Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10090-10091 | 08/31/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacquie █ | Witness Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10103-10104 | 08/27/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Witness Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10106-10137 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Meetings/ Confidential Info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 12569 | 07/30/2009 | Carl Linder | █ █ | Epstein Sex Abuse Litigation Forum | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15827-15837 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie █ | █ █ | Retainer for Investigator | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; | + +Jaffe Weissine. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | protected by privacy rights | +| 15820-15822 | 10/29/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | Cara ██████████ | Subpoenas for Epstein's Attorneys | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15401-15412 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ ██████████ | Disseminate the letter from wexner atty | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 15356-15359 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | ██████████ ██████████ | Witness info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 14934-14950 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | Bradley Edwards | Investigator info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 13413-13414 | 08/06/2009 | Denis Kleinfeld | ██████████ Edwards | Epstein information | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 13908-13911 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Meeting info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10595-10597 | 09/29/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Subpoena for Adriana ██████████ | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 10621-10624 | 10/02/2009 | Bradley ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Meeting with Wexner atty | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +JatALL\_ ielssi A Mlle Fistos a Lenrman + +| | | i n | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|------------------------|--------|------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | William Berger | Trial Prep | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10681-10692 | 10/07/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Depositions | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10777-10786 | 10/16/2009 | | Paul Cassell | New Evidence | | teen | | | | | +| | | | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04094-04100 | 04/07/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | | | | | | | +| | | | | ( rtio | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02915 | 10/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Elston | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 02971 | 10/14/2009 | Jacquie | Bradley Edwards | Larry Visoskl d epo | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02976 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Joh n | | | | | | | | | +| | | r iN1 | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | Disseminate the | letter | from | | | | | +| | | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02995 | 06/24/2009 | Bradley Edwards | | Litigation Strategy | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10172.10178 | 08/12/2009 | | Jacquie | Trump Depo | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissing. Fistos & Lehrman + +| | pm | to | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | pattcrion | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|---|---------------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 10193 | 08/11/2009 | | Jacquie | | Trump Depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10255 | 09/09/2009 | | William Berger | | Depo of Man Dersh | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 10259-10263 | 09/09/2009 | Attorneys of RRA | Jacquie | | Cooperfiel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 03876-03877 | 10/26/2009 | | Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| | | | | | 4\ , | | | | | +| | | | | | n rategy | | | | | +| | | | | S | tmt. | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 03879-03884 | 07/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 03886-03891 | 07/13/2009 | | f:ZRIssell | | litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03905-03920 | 09/08/2009 | William Berger | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03937 | 08/17/2009 | Carolyn | | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | + +a Jaffe. Weissine. a, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | pALE | M | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04005-04011 | 05/13/2009 | | William Berger | Discovery | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04070-04093 | 04/07/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion to Strike | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03754 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Conference | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03848-03858 | 09/09/2009 | | Jacquie | Coolie eId ervice | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03642-03643 | 09/04/2009 | Paul Cassell | | 1. Accounts/ 2. Motion for IME | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03657-03661 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at ARA | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02475 | 06/15/2009 | Susan Stirling | | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02494-02515 | D9/20/2009 | | Pat | Mark Epstein Info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissine, Ftstos & Lenrman + +| BATES | DATE 12 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------------|--------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 02520-02543 | 06/06/2009 | Paul Cassell | Memo of Assest Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02548-02553 | 08/03/2009 | Beth Williamson | Federal Subpoena | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02560-02565 | 07/31/2009 | Jacquie | Federal Subpoen | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | rotected b | rIva ri hts | | +| 02568-02570 | 10/13/2009 | Jacquie | New rock | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02578-02583 | 05/28/2009 | 7Paul Cassell | | | | | | +| | | | tlon Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 02619-02622 | 09/09/2009 | Jacquie Bradlelgdwerds | | | | | | +| | | | New client Retainer | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | protected privacy rights by | | | +| 02633-02646 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell lliki,r, | | | | | | +| | | k \O | | | | | | +| | | IIIII | Response to | Motion to | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07959-07964 | 09/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Jaffe.Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman + +| PALE IQ FROM DESCRIPliON | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------|------------| +| 07967-07975 09/22/2009 lacquie Mike Fisten Subpoena on Epstein case Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07979-08000 08/18/2009 Jacqule Subpoenas for Pilots | | | | +| `Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07735-07736 07/24/2009 Jacquie Releases for theta Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07643-07645 09/09/2009 Jacqule New dieta\pr | | | | +| ( S\ | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07698-07706 09/06/2009 Paul Cassell Answ to the Complaint | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07620-07632 08/14/2009 Jacquie Bradl Review of "Notice of Taking Depo | | | | +| Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | +| 07635-07636 10/15/2009 Mike Fisten illill.. | | | | +| Questions from forensic | | | | +| accountant detecting Epstein | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07617-07618 07/ 13/2009 Pau Epstein strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07550-07589 10/30/2009 I Paul Cassell Motion to Supplement with the Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissing. ristos ai t.enrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| | | | | Visoski depo | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | | | +| 07595-07604 | 05/20/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Utigation Strategy | | | | +| | | | | | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07616 | 07/22/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Litigation Strategy | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07530-07549 | 06/11/2009 | | —Susan Stirling | Overtlme 4 \ | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07470-07507 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | | lielc)timpel | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07447-07469 | 10/13/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mlle | | | | | +| | | | | New Times Ankle on epstein | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07444-07446 | 05/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Response to Motion | to | | | +| | | | | | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07440 | 10/18/2009 | Atto ys a RRA | | New Trump Property | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07436 | 04/11/2009 | Adler | | New cases | Work product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Wei i Fistos & Lehrman + +| | RAT€ TO | FROM | ciESCRIPT10N | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07424-07431 | 09/26/2009 | Paul (-Acton | Need Depo Transcript | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07412-07423 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07403-07411 | 04/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | Draft Motion to Strike | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07394-07402 | 07/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | Multiple 2255 Counts | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07386-07392 | 05/28/2009 | William Berger | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07378-07385 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07370-07377 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07354-07369 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | Motion to Protect 2nd | depo Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | /0 | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJE,CTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 07346 | 10/28/2009 | Beth Williamson | | Motion to protect 2nd depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07337 | 10/28/2009 | | Jeanne | Motion to protect r d depo | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 07328 | 10/28/2009 | | Beth Williamson | Motion to proteca | | | | | +| | | | | AAIII IIC.) | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07319 | 10/28/2009 | | Jacquie | Motion to protect r d depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07313-07318 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | aidwardsk\ | | | | | | +| | | | / / \-- | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07287.07301 | 07/08/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion to Compel — File this | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07252.07278 | 09/08/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Motion for IME +Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07247-07251 | 09/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for IME + Accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jatte, Weissing. + +| | Jan | ig, | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|--------------|-----------------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 07230-07233 | 06/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Memo on Asset Transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07157.07158 | 09/29/2009 | =Adler | | RE: Mark | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07128-07141 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Motion for bond a transfer | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 07094-07098 | 09/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | | | | | | | +| | | | | letter on RE Motions to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07025.07027 | 10/29/2009 | | Paul rAccPll | M. and E.W. v. Epstein — | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07099-07106 | 09/14/2009 | | _ack | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07071-07078 | 07/23/2009 | Paul Cassell ( N, | | | | | | | +| | | (7 1%ll | | | | | | | +| | | | | LM.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07066-07070 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | LM.'s Son's B-day | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07015-07016 | 10/13/2009 | I | Paul Cassell | Evidence of Asset transfers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +FiSt05 & tenrman + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos& Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | and/or liquidations | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 07019-07024 | 10/29/2009 | [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | L.M. and E.W. v. Epstein – I'm on it | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06837-06839 | 04/08/2009 | Beth Williamson | [REDACTED] | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06826-06836 | 04/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | Beth Williamson | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06823-06825 | 04/08/2009 | [REDACTED] | Beth Williamson | Jane Doe change of address | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06813-06816 | 07/02/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley [REDACTED] | Doe v. Epstein Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06808-06810 | 09/13/2009 | [REDACTED] | Paul Cassell | "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff – Running a giant Ponzi scheme?" | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06804-06805 | 09/13/2009 | Paul Cassell | [REDACTED] | "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff – Running a giant Ponzi scheme?" | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 06794 | 10/23/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Interesting Web Site | Work product; attorney/client privilege | + +| | | 12 | _ FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|----------------------------------|----------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06800-06803 | 09/06/2009 | Paul Cassell | | RE: 1. Accountants 2. Motion for | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06761-06762 | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | IME Rules | | | | | | +| | | | | | | work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06767-06769 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | IME's c\ | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06782-06787 | 04/10/2009 | Paul Cassell | Edwards | r | | | | | | +| | | | | Confidential Detailed | Strategy | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06744.06747 | 05/01/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Depo ofJeffrey Epstein | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 067364)6739 | 05/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Asset Protection Issue | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | A A\ | | protected by privacy rights ll | | | | | | +| 06709-06710 | 10/14/2009 | Bradle*ItNiards | Mike Fisten | Igor Lnoview depo | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissine. ristos at tenrman + +Jaffe. eissin FIstos & Lehrman + +| fall§ | PAU | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|-------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06691-06696 | 07/09/2009 | | Paul Cassell | How many 2255 claims? | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06683-06686 | 07/08/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Hiding Assets | | | | | +| | | | | | 1/4 to | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06654 | 07/24/2009 | Paul Cassell | | Secretary Contacting | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06599-06600 | 07/08/ 2009 | | Paul Cassell | Hidin | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06574-06590 | 04/07/2009 | Paul Cassell | Ed | +on to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06567-06570 | 07/09/2009 | | Paul CC | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06558-06561 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Ca | | | | | | | +| | | | | Motion to Compel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe Weissing. Fistos&Lehrman + +### Privile e Lo — Dated 2-23-2011 + +| | DATE | FROM | DESCRIPTION | | OBJECTION | | | +|-------------|------------|--------------|-----------------------|-----------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 06554-06557 | 05/14/2009 | | | | | | | +| | ii | m=i | | | | | | +| | | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06549-06553 | 05/14/2009 | Paul Cassell | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06540-06541 | 09/21/2009 | Mike Fisten | Info on Maxwell | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06537 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Doe v.Jeffrey Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06529-06530 | 10/23/2009 | Paul Cassell | Doe v. Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06496-06505 | 10/20/2009 | Paul Cassell | Visoski depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | ( S. | | | protected by privacy rights | | | +| | 09/25/2009 | Willia r | Financial discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06149-06153 | 07/10/2009 | Pau Cassell | Federal First | Amendment | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissine.i ristos a Lenrman + +| | DATE | iv | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|-----------------------------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06118-06146 | 09/15/2009 | Seth Lehrman | | Farnsworth v. Marys case Work | product; | attorney/cilent | privilege; | +| 06113-06117 | 07/14/2009 | | Richard Wolfe | Facebook/Myspace Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06106-06112 | 05/19/2009 | Amy Swan | William Berger | Expert Witness | | | | +| | | | | Work | product | attorney/diem | privilege; | +| 06091 | 08/04/2009 | William Berger | Paul Cassell | | | | | +| | | | | r EWand LM v. Epstein Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06001-06011 | 07/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | EdulQrps | Epstein's Address and Position of | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05996 | 04/08/2009 | Edwards | | | | | | +| | | e rssr | | | | | | +| | | | | Litigation Strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05998-06000 | 09/17/2009 | ..,Ja la .. | | Epstein: Forensics/Investigations | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05992 | 04/19/2009 | I | Marc Nurik | Litigation Strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissiniz, i Fistos & Lenrman + +| | PATE | _IQ | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|----------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05968 | 10/17/2009 | | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05944-05947 | 05/01/2009 | William Berger | | litigation Strategy ' | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05927 | 09/18/2009 | | Amy Swan | Ryan | | | | | +| | | | | ( c\ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05931-05932 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | | | | | | | +| | | | | ene Cell Phone Number | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05919-05920 | 07/28/2009 | | Amy n | Client's Cell Phone Number | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05915 | 04/22/2009 | | Marc Nurik | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05911 | 05/28/2009 | Bradley | William Berger | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissine. i FIStOS & Lenrman + +| | ME TO | FROM | 'SCRIPTION | OBJECT, i, | | | | +|-------------|----------------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05890 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05893-05894 | 07/27/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05898-05899 | 07/28/2009 | Amy Swan | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05885 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie | Litigadivic | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 0587405879 | 07/23/2009 | Jacquie | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | +| 05868 | 08/03/2009 | Ken Jenne | Epstein Litigation Strategy | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05865 | 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards | Jacquie | Litigation Strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05860-05861 | 09/10/2009 | Maribel Matiska | Litigation strategy | Work | product; | attomey/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissing, i Fistos & Lenrrnan + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------------|----------------|---------------------|------------|-------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05845 | 07/24/2009 | | Ken Jenne | Plane Tail Numbers | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05811 | 06/09/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Witness Numbers | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05813 | 08/15/2009 | | Ken Jenne | Litigation | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| | | | | | proteed ct | by privacy rights | | | +| 05748-05749 | 08/11/2009 | | Jaoquie | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05711 | 05/11/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | tclwACti* | s) Subpoena Clinton | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05701-05704 | 04/20/2009 | | Russell Adler | Epstein strategy | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05687 | 08/21/2009 | Bradley Eciviards | Marc Nurik | Alfredo Rodriguez | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05690-05691 | 05/11/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Motion to Unseal | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +MRJaffe, WelssinR, Fistos & Lehrman + +| | | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05680-05682 | 05/11/2009 | | William Berger | Subpoena Clinton | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05676 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Topics for Meeting —" | | | | | +| | | | | -c fr | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05648 | 07/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Gary | Assem ps in Litigation meets` | | | | | +| | | | | ( c | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05629 | 08/03/2009 | | Mike Fisten | et Law Enforcement cannot release | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05621-05622 | 09/18/2009 | Amy Swan | | Preparing Motion to take an IME | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05610-05612 | 04/27/2009 | Susan Stirli (nc | | | | | | | +| | | | | Request for Copies | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05588.05590 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Travel restrictions | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jerre, weissing. towards. ristos a Lenrman + +| QATE IQ FROM DESCRIPTION, | OBJECTION | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05575-05576 08/21/2009 Marc Nurik Alfredo Rodriguez Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05582 09/11/2009 Mike Fasten Epstein strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05569-05570 08/17/2009 Marc Nurik Legal Opinion | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05556-05558 08/14/2009 Attorneys at MA Corn with legal expert Work | | | | +| irrelevant I | and not | | | +| zilis lafcn | | | | +| 05537 07/30/2009 Jacquie Edwardi% ieo—/ objections from defense | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05534 07/24/2009 Ken Jenne Flight logs for Epstein Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05518 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Assemble Epstein Litigation | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05512-05513 07/23/2009 Priscila | | | | +| Nora Batian Assemble Epstein Litigation | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. ristos & Lenrman + +| | DAj | TO | FROM | pEsatIPTION | OBJECTION, | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|-------------------|----------------------------------|------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05502-05507 | 07/22/2009 | Jacquie | | Wayne Black's email | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05475 | 04/21/2009 | Marc Nurik | | Call with Chris Hanson from | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05471-05472 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Legal expert I gal issue | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05447 | 08/14/2009 | Marc Nurik | William ilergerzt | nication with legal expert | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05420-05423 | 05/20/2009 | William Berger | rill# | Research on cases saying a judge | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05409-05412 | 08/17/2009 | | arc urik | Legal opinion regarding | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05403-05405 | 04/27/2009 | M ft) | | Jeffrey Epstein Wikipedia page | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissing. mstos & Lenrman + +| BATES | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|--------------|-------------|------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Proposal for settlement | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05399 | 10/17/2009 | William Berger | ██████████ | Proposal for settlement | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05271-05272 | 07/22/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Depo Dates to take SR, LM, and CW | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05259-05260 | 07/22/2009 | ██████████ | Jacquie ██████████ | Investigator retainer | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05238 | 07/14/2009 | ██████████ | William Berger | File a request to produce | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05240-05241 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Judge's order on the Epstein probation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05197-05199 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Michael Reiter info | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +### Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 tarmer, Jane, weissine. i ristos a cerirrnan + +| SATES DAR TO ROM D iPT1 | OBJECTION | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05155-05156 04/20/2009 Adler Set Epstein's depo duces tecum Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05159-05160 05/28/2009 William Berger Right to move to reconside< | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05149-05150 05/27/2009 Susan Stirling Epstein filed a n to | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05153 08/24/2009 Mike Flsten EpsteirTtrav | | | | +| work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05146-05147 05/26/2009 Paul Cassell The response to the motion to | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05137-05144 05/20/2009 Attorneys at RRA Russell Adler Epstein litigation strategy Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05133-05136 05/11/2009 William Berger Subpoena Clinton and others on | | | | +| Sid witness list | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01749-01751 10/28/2009 Phaedra Xanthos Final affidavit from forensic | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos&Lehrman + +| Una | DATE | Jo | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|----------------|----------------|------------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05125-05132 | 05/05/2009 | William Berger | | Response to motion to compel all | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05115-O5117 | 04/27/2009 | | Susan Stirling | Epstein depos | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01699 | 09/15/2009 | Jacquie | | VZ depot\ | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05120-05121 | 05/04/2009 | William Berger | | e /Cte r asking 5" how the depo of | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05095-05098 | 07/01/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Epstein v. State of Florida — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01694 | 10/17/2009 | Jacquie | | PFS | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05066-05067 | 05/06/2009 | Marc Nurik | William Berger | Epstein sealed records and TV | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaff Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | 1.4 | FROM | DESCRIPJIQN | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|----------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05054-05065 | 08/18/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | Epstein Potential witnesses | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05049-05053 | 08/18/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Subpoenas for potential | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04957-04964 | 09/04/2009 | | Scott | Juan Aiessi' statIment and | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04952-04953 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Paul Cassell | Epstein injunction filing — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04955-04956 | 09/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Epstein Invoice | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04916-04920 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | | Updates on # of victims, billing | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04899 | 09/10/2009 | Bradley | Jacquie | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| MI | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 04893.04896 | 09/10/2009 | Jacquie | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04890 | 09/10/2009 | Jacqule | | Epstein Discovery | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04884-04885 | 09/10/2009 | | Jacquie | Epstein Discovery | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01469 | 07/17/2009 | Ken Jenne | | Discussions about the Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04745-04747 | 08/04/2009 | | Jacquie Joh | Epstein depo in New York | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04738-04744 | 08/25/2009 | | P | | | | | | +| | | | ,j 1 | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04660 | 10/22/2009 | Edwards | Marc Nurik | Epstein AUSA — Attorneys Fees | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 04642-04646 | 09/11/2O09 | | | | | | | | +| | | Bradley | Beth Williamson | Discussions about Brad's | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +### Privilege Loa — 23-2011 + +Jaffe, Weissina. Fistos& Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | | to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04607-04617 | 09/11/2009 | Jacquie ██████████ | ██████████ ██████████ | Holding Fed Subs until we get response on form | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04526-04535 | 10/17/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Two ideas regarding strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04488-04490 | 07/18/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Paul Cassell | Taking the 5 th | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 01362 | 09/11/2009 | Elizabeth Villar | ██████████ ██████████ | Getting the forensic aspect off the ground -epstein's asset transfers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 04481-04487 | 08/18/2009 | Paul Cassell | Bradley Edwards | Epstein Subpoena | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05465-05467 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ ██████████ | Subpoenas for trial | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05470 | 07/11/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Wayne Black | Flight Logs | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05496-05497 | 08/10/2009 | ██████████ ██████████ | Alfredo | Phone Numbers | Work product; attorney/client privilege; | + +Jaffe, WelS\$R1R, ristos at kenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|--------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | Rodriguez | | irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05501 | 07/21/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Litigation strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05524-05533 | 07/23/2009 | Wayne Black | ██████████ | Addresses for people involved in the case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05541 | 07/31/2009 | Carolyn ██████████ | ██████████ | All depos in jane doe's case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05635 | 10/22/2009 | Pat ██████████ | ██████████ | New developments that require your expertise | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe. Weissina. FIstos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 05640 | 10/29/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | New Epstein victim | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05652-05653 | 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn [REDACTED] | personal discussion | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05671 | 10/22/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Pat [REDACTED] | Litigation strategy | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05696 | 05/11/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Phone number for one of the other girls on the list of prospective clients | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05815-05816 | 04/01/2009 | Carolyn [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Taking the depos of everyone | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05820-05821 | 07/23/2009 | Bradley [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Dates for depos of all witnesses in the case | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead | + +Jaffe Weissin Fistos & Lehrman + +| gag TO FROM DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| +| 05824-05825 07/23/2009 Wayne Black Paula Heil Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07/23/2009 Wayne Black Dates for depos of all witnesses | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05833-05835 07/23/2009 Wayne Black | | | | +| FBI has orIgi mit logs and | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05839-05841 07/23/2009 Wa Copies of the flight logs Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05869.05870 04/01/2009 Carolyn_; OM Personal convo between Brad | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| \ | protected by privacy rights | | | +| 05913-05914 04/01/2009 | | | | +| Carolyn Edwards Personal convo between Brad | | | | +| Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane, Weissine,i Fistos & Lenrman + +| | RAE | TO | IOM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|---------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------|------------|-------------------------|------------| +| 05995 | 04/01/2009 | | Carolyn | Third party subpoenas for | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06513-06523 | 06/15/2009 | | Wayne Black | Ghisella Maxwell info | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06699-06701 | 06/17/2009 | Wayne Black | | Epstein litigation(ts) | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07079.07089 | 09/03/2009 | | Pat | DiscasnACt aisot Al5 t girls v Involved in | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07437-07439 | 10/19/2009 | Paul ra sell | Ronald ' | New evidence of Epstein | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07936-07958 | 04/28/2009 | Earleen Cote | | | | | | | +| | | ‘ .4141, | | | | | | | +| | | | | Cases against mansion nightclub | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08006-08011 | 06/03/2009 | hA llili l6 l | Wayne Black | Getting addresses for people for | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 11186-11187 | 08/19/2009 | M- | im | Plaintiff's Witness List | Work | e product; | y attorney/client /dieM | privilege; | + +Jaffe. Weissi Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 26479-26481 | 08/19/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Assistance on the Epstein Case | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 27155-27159 | 10/23/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Steven Jaffe | PACER entries | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26604-26605 | 10/27/2009 | Phaedra Xanthos | Ken Jenne | Political | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 26570 | 08/13/2009 | Scott Rothstein | Marc Nurik | iscusslons about Epstein | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 04954 | 10/28/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Jacqul | Creation of another Doe file | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06665-06670 | 08/12/2009 | Shawn Gilbert\ | | | | | | | +| | | Ili | ll | | | | | | +| | | | | Epstein Costs | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 06675.06676 | 08/26/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Personal convo in regards to | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|---------------|--------------------------------------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 06679.06682 | 08/26/2009 | | Shawn Gilbert | Personal convo in regards to | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 07590-07594 | 05/13/2009 | Shawn Gilbert | | Office information Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08451-08453 | 08/17/2009 | | Pat | Updated Witness List | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08455-08456 | 06/03/2009 | | | V Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08466-08479 | 08/26/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | | | | | +| | | | ( 14/ | | | | | +| | | | | itness info that we need to use Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01767 | 07/06/2009 | Wayne Black | Edwards | Info on a guy going to victim's | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08379 | 06/06/2009 | | Wayne Black | Info on Former FHP trooper | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 08399 | 07/23/2009 | | Paul Cassell | Epstein affidavit to the reply | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissiria. FISIOS & tenrman + +| | DATE | 12 | | DESCRIPTION | OIRCT1ON | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|-------------------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 08406 | 10/30/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Adler | Flying epstein rape survivor to St. | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/dient | privilege; | +| 05697 | 08/19/2009 | | Mike listen | Meeting with client | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20330-20334 | 08/24/2009 | | Pat | Serving Alan DershowItz | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20327-20329 | 10/17/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Mike listen | Pro agr hased by Epstein in | | | | | +| | | | i | llIV | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20100-20102 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Epstein's arrival at his building | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20283-20326 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at MA | Mike listen | | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20092-20099 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at MA | | | | | | | +| | | | Ken Jenne | Epstein travel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissing. rastos & ienrman + +| | DATE | TO | ilitad | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|-------------|------------------------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 20085-20091 | 10/15/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Questions from accountant | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19996-20084 | 10/14/2009 | Attorneys at PRA | Mike Fisten | Visoski Research and Questlo | | | | | +| | | | | | ork | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20217.20218 | 08/04/2009 | | Mike Fisten | Info on Copperfiekl | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20213-20216 | 08/03/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | | | | | | +| | | | | P-I?S eld | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20211.20212 | 08/03/2009 | Mike Fisten | 7 | Edwards rPilots depo | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 2020740210 | 08/10/2009 | Jacquie | | list of witness | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20201-20204 | 08/24/2009 | Attomeys at PM | | | | | | | +| | | | | Serving Dershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jaffe, Weissing,IIMMI Fistos & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | MOO | | | | +|------------------------|--------------|------------------|-------------|----------------------------------|------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 20193-20200 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | | Proof of him being out of FL — | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19982-19985 | 09/03/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Dave Rogers depo | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19988 | 10/07/2009 | Jacquie | Mike Fisten | Depositions \HS , \"1" | | | | | +| | | | | ASAC oi | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19971-19981 08/24/2009 | | Attorneys at RRA | Mike Fisten | SOVIsDershowitz | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19969-19970 | '-08/18/2009 | | Mike FIC | bpoenas for Pilots | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 19962.19968 | 08/03/2009 | | ten | Working with the FBI to get some | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20190-20192 | 08/24/2009 | Pat Roberts | | Personal emails regarding Brad's | | | | | +| | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 20187-20189 | 08/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Ken Jenne | Epstein travel | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissing. ristos & Lenrman + +| | CIATt | ilt FROM | DESCRIPTION | gplECTION | | | | +|-------------|------------|------------------|--------------------------------------|------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| +| 19959-19961 | 07/24/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Flight logs for Epstein | Work | ;product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 00156-00157 | 07/09/2009 | Paul Cassell | 2255 Problem | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 15366-15367 | 09/04/2009 | Attorneys at RRA | Witness info that we need to use | Work | product | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01003-01005 | 10/12/2009 | Paul Cassell | Asset movement | by Jeffrey | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01013.01014 | 10/29/2009 | | Cara Subpoenaing Epstein's attorneys | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 01042 | 07/22/2009 | Marc Nurik | | | | | | +| | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 03133-03134 | 06/09/2009 | Josh | Personal conversation | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +Jane. weissme. FIStOS & Lenrman + +| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +|-------------|------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 03129-03130 | 06/09/2009 | Josh [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 03119-03121 | 06/09/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Josh [REDACTED] | Personal conversation | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05440-05441 | 04/01/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) | CW Personal information | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 02593-02594 | 05/13/2009 | T. [REDACTED] (wife) | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Regarding personal information. | Privileged document- irrelevant and not calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence, privacy rights of parties involved, spouse privilege | +| 18877-18879 | 09/10/2009 | Marc Nurik | Bradley Edwards | Concerning the names of potential witnesses and the issuance of subpoena's for them. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18344-18347 | 08/24/2009 | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | | +| 18339-18340 | 08/24/2009 | Ken Jenne | [REDACTED] | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18341-18343 | 08/24/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18853-18854 | 09/10/2009 | [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Concerning the names of potential witnesses and the issuance of subpoena's for them. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18337-18338 | 08/03/2009 | [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Investigative information and techniques on the Epstein case are discussed. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18306 | 10/16/2009 | Pat [REDACTED] | Ken Jenne | List of future depo's in Epstein case and names of potential witnesses. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18307 | 10/17/2009 | Mike Fisten | [REDACTED] | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein Assets. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +| Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DATE | TO | FROM | | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION | +| 18308-18309 | 10/18/2006 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein Assets. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18188-18189 | 09/04/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein witnesses and names of potential witnesses. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy-rights | +| 18184-18185 | 08/26/2009 | Mike Fisten | | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein witnesses and names of potential witnesses. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18186-18187 | 08/31/2009 | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Jacquie [REDACTED] | Discussion of potential witnesses and the process of subpoena for depo's. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 18180-18183 | 08/24/2009 | [REDACTED] | Mike Fisten | Investigative Discussion re: finding of Epstein witnesses and names of potential witnesses. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | +| 05256-05257 | 07/21/2009 | [REDACTED] | Wayne Black | Investigative Discussion re: strategy of case. | Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights | + +Jaffe Welssin Fistos & Lehrman + +| | DATE TO | FROM | pEscaornon | | | mom | | | | +|-------------|------------|-------------|---------------|------------|-----|------|----------|-----------------|------------| +| 05253 | 08/24/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05279-05280 | 08/24/2O09 | Pat | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05315-05318 | 07/26/2009 | Wayne Black | Investigative | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | strategy of | set\ c | | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | +| 05209-05211 | 06/26/2009 | Wayne Black | I es t e | Discussion | re: | | | | | +| | | | | | | Work | product; | attorney/client | privilege; | + +!v\* + +# EXHIBIT 10 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +![](_page_214_Picture_1.jpeg) + +Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • Washington, DC • Quito, Ecuador + +April 8, 2011 + +PTA 13-Maildutavearcevlaw,cont + +Jack Scuola Searcy Denney Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Re: Epsteitilliothstelta + +Dear Jack: + +James D. Silver 954.847.3324 D Isilver + +C) You sent me a proposal by letter dated April 7, 2011 regardin , ction to mo and my Ann of ai l o documents that turned over to the Special Judge Carney (the "Special ), in the special process that has been on-goingbefore Judge Ray in the RRA b ptcy case. Wo spoke y telephone at length late today and reached agreement to your proposal, subject to the modified language that wo discussed. I have taken the language from your letter and revised it below based on what we had discussed. Of course, I also had to change the language to reflect that the letter is now being written by me. + +Accor intended to confirm the terms and conditions of the production by your client, , to us of all documents, without redaction, and notwithstanding any claim of privilege m e or that could be made e Bankruptcy Trustee Stettin caused to be turned over or delivered to the Spec' t to the special process described above and any Anther documents that has in his possession, custody or control responsive to our subpoena (collective y, the "Epstein Related Documents"). The term and conditions of our agreement are as follows: + +- I We will stipulate to stay enforcement of our current subpoena solely as it relates to the BMRelated Documents subject to the tents and conditions of this agreement; +- 2. You will produce to us all of the Epstein Related Documents for an "attorneys eyes only' review with the express agreement that the production is pursuant to the common interest privilege and does not constitute a waiver of any privilege otherwise applicable to the documents; + +Fatabltalted 1974 Rex Conrad 1935.1999 I William Scherer Conrad & Scherer, LLP I 633 South Federal Highway, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Mailing Address I P.O. Box 14723, Fort Lauderdale, a 33302 Phone 954.462.5500 I Fax 954.463.9244 www.conradschereocom + +3. We will preserve the strict confidentiality of all materials produced to us pursuant to this agreement unless: + +- a. the same information is or was obtained from an independent source; +- b. you agree to release or modify the restriction on our use of particul materials or; c- we obtain acourt order authorizing our use of the ina 'tag that the materials in question are not privileged. ( e-g44' +- d. we are compelled to produce or disclose the materials or information derived from them. + +4. We agree that neither the documents themselves nor any information obtained from the documents produced to us pursuant to this agreement, subject to paragraph 3 above, will be shared with our clients unless they expressly ace to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. + +S. No copies will bo made of the documents unless one or more of the conditions of paragraph 3 above have been satisfied, or to the er.tont we provide copies to aclient or clients pursuant to paragraph 4 above; + +6. Nothing in this agreement will restrict our disclosing any documents) for in camera review in connection with any privilege objection you seek to maintain, or in connection with any request we make to use the documents without restriction and/or to determine that such documents are not protected from disclosure by any privilege or otherwise; + +7. Stay of the enforcement of our subpoena may be lifted at any time to seek additional documents that may come into your possession or control or to satisfy the conditions of Paragraph 3c; + +)0' 8. The terms of this agreement may bo disclosed as we may deem appropriate, and we intend to disclose the terms to Judge Ray at Monday's hearing in connection with announcing our resolution of the issues that were to be considered at that hearing; + +9, In the event that any third-party seeks to compel production of materials disclosed to uant to this agreement, we will notify you immediately of such efforts and cooperate with you In preserving the confidentiality of documents you designate as privileged or not otherwise discoverable until such time as any one of the conditions set forth in paragraph 3 above have been satisfied; + +10. You have agreed to deliver the Epstein Related Documents to us immediately based on our agreement with you to the terms of this agreement; and + +![](_page_215_Picture_10.jpeg) + +*Jack Scorola* +April 8, 2011 +Page 3 + +11. Since this agreement relates to documents requested in a bankruptcy subpoena issued by us in the RRA bankruptcy case, it is agreed and understood that all disputes relating to this agreement as well as its enforcement will be determined exclusively by Judge Ray in the RRA bankruptcy case. Without limiting the foregoing, to the extent we seek to use or disclose any of the Epstein Related Documents (and you do not consent) and/or to obtain a determination of any issues relating to any claimed privilege regarding those documents, such determinations shall be made exclusively by Judge Ray in the RRA bankruptcy case. + +If you agree with the terms and conditions set forth above, please sign this letter below and indicate that it is "Agreed" or send me an e-mail indicating your agreement. + +Very truly yours, + +![]()JDS/ra + +![](_page_216_Picture_197.jpeg) + +James D. Silver + +From: James D. Silver Sent Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:45 PM To: 'Jack Scarola' Cc brad@pathtolustice.com Subject: RE: Agreement regarding Epstein Related Documents + +Jack, + +Confirming our phone conversation of yesterday we now have an agreement and will appear at the hearing tomorrow morning where 1 will announce our agreement to Judge Ray. As for the issue regarding how the documents are to be provided, you will provide the electronic documents on disc and vie can copy for ourselves from that disk as we deem appropriate. As for additional responsive documents that are not on disk, you agree that they can be copied by a copy service of my choosing, at my side's expense; + +I am glad that we were able to amicably resolve our issues regarding the docu set forth in our letter agreement. Have a nice rest of your weekend and I will see you at bankrupt omorrow morning. + +Jim Silver + +From: Jack Scarola [malito:55X@SearcyLaw.com] Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:41 PM To: James D. Silver Cc brad@pathtojustice.com Subject Re: Agreement regarding Epstein Related + + To: Jack Scarola Sent: Fri Apr 08 20:11:36 20H Subject Agreement regarding Epstein Related Documents + +Jack, + +See attached least and let me know if it accurately sets forth the terms of our agreement. As we were finalizing the document we had a computer issue and the Word version was lost. Due to the lateness of the hour we did not want to retype the entire letter. As a result, I was unable to correct the mistake in your e-mail address listed on my letter but the correct one is on this e-mail. Also, we had to whiteout the sy,in delivery on the second to last page of paragraph 9 since we couldn't correct it on the document. I wanted to let you know so that it does not look like the document had been altered. + +Please let me know as soon as you can if we are in agreement. My cell number is 305-588-5664. + +Jim Silver + +eSafe scanned this email for malicious content \*\*\* + +••• IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders 'o' + +# **EXHIBIT 11** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Page 1 + +1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT + SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +6 In Re: + +7 ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + 8 Debtor. + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM TRUSTEE + PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PROTOCOL BSTABLISHED + BY DE#672 (807); AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + (819) + +13 + +14 + +15 August 4, 2010 + +16 + +17 The above-criticed cause came on for + 18 hearing before the HONORABLE RAYMOND B. RAY, + 19 one of the Judges of the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY + 20 COURT, in and for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, + 21 at 299 East Broward Blvd, Fort Luderdale, Broward + 22 County, Florida, on Tuesday, August 4, 2010, + 23 commending all or about 9:30 a.m., and the following + 24 proceedings were hed: + 25 Reported By: Margaret Franzen + +Page 2 + +1 APPEARANCES: + +2 + +3 BERGER ENGERMAN, by + CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE + on behalf of the Trustee + +4 + +5 + +6 CONRAD & SCHERER, by + WILLIAM R. SCHERER, ESQUIRE + on behalf of victims + +7 + +8 + +9 [REDACTED] WHITE BURNETT, by + RONALD G. MARVINTH, ESQUIRE + LILLY AND [REDACTED], ATTORNEY-AT-LAW + CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE + [REDACTED] L. ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE + on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein + +10 + +11 [REDACTED] JAFFE WEISSING [REDACTED] PISTOS & LEHRMAN, by + GARY BARNES ESQUIRE + BRAD [REDACTED] ESQUIRE + on behalf of LM, Brad Edwards and + [REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Edwards Flatos & Lehrman + +12 + +13 [REDACTED] + +14 [REDACTED] + +15 [REDACTED] + +16 [REDACTED] + +17 [REDACTED] + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Page 3 + +1 THE COURT: Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler. + 2 All right. May I have appearances, please? + 3 MR. LICHTMAN: Good morning, Judge. + 4 Chuck Lichtman, Berger Singerman, for the trustee. + 5 MR. NEIWIRTH: Good morning, your Honor. + 6 Ronald Neiwirth [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, on behalf of + 7 the movant, Epstein, and with me today are two of my + 8 partners Chris Knight and Lilly And [REDACTED] + 9 [REDACTED] Good morning, your Honor. + 10 MR. KNIGHT: Good morning, your Honor. + 11 MR. NEIWIRTH: -- both of whom are more + 12 familiar with the State Court angle on this than I + 13 am, so they came along to be able to elucidate that + 14 end of it. + 15 MR. [REDACTED] Good morning, your Honor. + 16 Gary [REDACTED] on behalf of LM, Brad [REDACTED], and + 17 the Farmer Jaffe Weissing law firm. We are an + 18 interested party and have filed a motion for + 19 protective order as to the subpoena that is at + 20 issue here today. + 21 THE COURT: All right. Insofar as the + 22 TD Bank motion, Docket Entry 780, that has been the + 23 subject matter of an agreed order that was submitted + 24 to rue. + 25 MR. LICHTMAN: Correct, Judge. + +Page 4 + +1 THE COURT: Mr. Scherer. + 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. + 3 I'm William Scherer and I'm here on behalf of a + 4 number of victims in the State Court action, as + 5 well as the chairman of the creditors' committee + 6 in the bankruptcy. + 7 THE COURT: All right. That leaves us with + 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's + 9 motion. + 10 MR. NEIWIRTH: Thank you, your Honor, and + 11 again, good morning. We represent Jeffrey Epstein. + 12 He has a civil claim pending in State Court in + 13 Palm Beach County. He had served a subpoena on + 14 Mr. Stettin requesting documents from the RRA estate. + 15 That was back in April. + 16 While this was still in process, in + 17 May, under Docket Entry 672, your Honor entered + 18 an order standardizing procedures for obtaining + 19 discovery from Mr. Stettin and the RRA estate, + 20 and at least on the face of it, it takes + 21 jurisdiction over all discovery offorts against + 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. + 23 We had a subpoena pending in State + 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger + 25 Singerman on behalf of the trustee that they had + +1 (Pages 1 to 4) + +![](_page_219_Picture_18.jpeg) + +input, please. + +MR. LICHTMAN: I'm going to let Mr. Scherer go first. + +MR. SCHERER: I think he wants me to go first. + +THE COURT: All right. + +MR. SCHERER: Your Honor, in November + +we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as a part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the Epstein/LM litigation in order to lure \$13.5 million worth of my victims, my clients, into making investments in these phoney settlements. + +And as we alleged in that State Court proceeding, and we've sharpened the allegations as we've amended a few times, we allege that sometime in late October, that my clients were invited into the Rothstein firm with Mr. Rothstein, and he explained that he had a litigation going in State Court with Mr. [REDACTED] representing LM, a victim of Mr. Epstein, and these are kind of sensational allegations and it's been printed widely. + +And my clients, a number of them and + +their lawyer, went into the Rothstein conference room and Mr. Rothstein brought down -- summoned the investigators, two of them, two or three of them, to bring down the Epstein file. And the lawyer that my clients brought from a national firm, went through the LM boxes, ten of them that the investigators brought down, and concluded that the Epstein case was a real case. + +And what Mr. Rothstein did with that real case, of course, is he told everybody that not only did he have the LM client of Mr. [REDACTED] that there were a number of other young ladies, that was widely published in the newspaper, that the firm was representing and that wanted to settle with Mr. Epstein on a confidential case. + +So he used the real case in order to defraud my clients into investing into these phoney settlements and paid 13 and a half million dollars. I believe that Mr. Rothstein and others in the firm also told that story to a lot of other people, and let a lot of other people examine those ten boxes of the real case. + +In addition, as we have alleged, that Mr. [REDACTED] and the firm put sensational + +allegations in the LM case that they knew were not true, in order to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman and other personages, I can't remember who they are, and all sorts of other allegations that really were not even related to the LM case. + +And to the extent that any lawyers from the RRA firm, former lawyers, made a ton of money or however Mr. [REDACTED] talked about it, we're interested in that ton of money because if they were involved in this scheme, this fraud, there's a crime fraud exception, and in addition, I want to see the ten boxes that they brought down. + +The trustee does not have those ten boxes. Those ten boxes were taken by Mr. [REDACTED] when he left the law firm, I presume. So we want the ten boxes, we want all the communications and we want to look through everything on behalf of my State Court case, but also on behalf of the creditors' committee because the creditors' committee is looking to see if anybody else in the firm, other than Rothstein, was involved in this missive fraud that used the Epstein case. + +The model of using an existing case and + +then splinting off a fraud from it is the same that was perpetrated on the Morse -- in the Morse situation, as has been alleged and widely produced. + +I can't conceive that Mr. [REDACTED] and the predecessor law firm would have any standing to prepare privilege logs or anything else, given what I just told the Court. That would be like having the fox guard the hen house. That Epstein case is settled, and to the extent it's the ten boxes of stuff that we looked through, and I'll have to get the boxes to see if the attorney who looked through them, and how much time he spent looking through them -- + +THE COURT: Where are the ten boxes? + +MR. SCHERER: That's a good question. + +The trustee does not have the ten boxes. I presume the ten boxes are residing with the lawyers who took the case, Mr. [REDACTED] and the successor law firm. The trustee does not have them. And then in addition, there's about 6,000 e-mails that the trustee has, and I bet you when we look at Qtasik, there's going to be a boatload more. + +My clients were also advised during + +|

1 their due diligence, short due diligence to
2 settle these cases with these young ladies --
3 these putative young ladies who had to get the
4 money and leave town because of whatever the
5 stories were, that there were other members of
6 the firm that told my clients that they, indeed,
7 had even identified more of these victims that
8 Mr. Rothstein didn't even know about at that
9 time. So we know it wasn't just Mr. Rothstein
10 spinning the tale, there were a lot of people in
11 the firm.
12 We've alleged almost all of this in our
13 State Court action that we filed in November, up
14 to where we are right now, but, your Honor, I
15 think your Honor is going to have to deal with
16 these issues in this court and I would urge you
17 to have the trustee get involved and let the
18 trustee do its job with respect to whether there
19 are privileges that need to be protected, work.
20 product or attorney/client privileges, given
21 what's going on, and I believe the trustee will
22 be investigating whether the trustee wants to
23 bring any claims on behalf of the estate by
24 virtue of what I've just failed out for you.
25 Thank you.

|

1 to take those ten boxes to start with.
2 THE COURT: All right, Mr. Lichtman.
3 MR. LICHTMAN: Good morning, Judge. I'm
4 going to try to walk you through sort of
5 chronologically the trustee's perspective of what has
6 happened here. I think that what I've heard from all
7 the parties are comments that are correct, and not
8 necessarily correct, and I'm not suggesting
9 falsehoods. We just have kind of a different
10 perspective of some things and there are some points
11 that ought to be corrected.
12 Mr. Stettin received a subpoena in a
13 Palm Beach State Court action for production of
14 documents, and as we had done in virtually every
15 subpoena, we went to our forensic necountants,
16 the Berkowitz Diok Polinock & Brant firm, and
17 said, okay, we need to produce c-malls and we
18 need to also then, with the staff that we have at
19 Berger Singerman and clsewhere, and look to see
20 if there are any hard documents that we can find,
21 notwithstanding what we'll call the issues as to
22 the RRA hard drive that contain client files.
23 We quickly realized that this is a
24 claim different than all of the other subpoenas.
25 The subpoenas that we had been receiving from

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

1 THE COURT: So your lawsuit in State Court
2 names these people as defendants?
3 MR. SCHERER: It names Rothstein. It
4 does not name Mr. [REDACTED]. It just names
5 Rothstein, not the firm, and lays out the facts
6 and says other people in the firm. We did not
7 name them because we want to see the documents
8 and see whether they had involvement.
9 But the facts that I have alleged for
10 you, your Honor, is pretty much what I've alleged
11 in my first through third amended complaint in
12 State Court.
13 THE COURT: So, in essence, your position
14 in this matter would be to support the motion to
15 compel and deny the motion for protective order?
16 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, notwithstanding
17 that Mr. Epstein is a convicted pedophile. I
18 want to put that on the record. You know, he's
19 served his time and whatever, but I support the
20 same position that he -- that he has asked the
21 Court, and that is to have the trustee deal with
22 this, get these documents and deal with it with
23 you, rather than allow the successor law firm to
24 have them.
25 I don't know where they had the right

|

1 virtually every other party in the case were
2 requests for production of documents related to
3 claims that those moving parties or requesting
4 parties would have as it pertains to them trying
5 to recover some aspect of money as pertained to
6 the Ponzi scheme.
7 Okay. Like Mr. Scherer, who said I
8 need a bunch of documents, can you help us? So
9 we would enter into, on a one by one basis, a
10 protective order that was very, very tightly
11 negotiated. There is no standard form protective
12 order in this case, contrary to what everybody
13 has told you. We have a form that we use, and
14 everybody that has come to us, we said, we need
15 to have a protective order in place --.
16 THE COURT: We have Docket Entry 672, which,
17 apparently is the document production protocol.
18 MR. LICHTMAN: We have that, yes, but then
19 we also, as an example, Document 685, have a
20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Scherer's
21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that
22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on.
23 So, in any event, what we realized is
24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott.
25 Rothstein, [REDACTED] case, is this is

| + +(Pages 21 lo24) + +# EXHIBIT 12 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +ric + +VOLUA40\$7 + +VIDEOTI st, SITION + +40:4Taken on Behalf of Plaintiff + +Friday, November 10th, 2017 10:02 a.m. - 6:16 p.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Examination of the witness taken before + +Sonja D. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 471-2995 + +1 A No. + +2 3 4 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. Has there been a notice of withdrawal? Because I haven't seen it either. + +5 6 7 MR. LINK: I think we represented it to Judge Hafele on Wednesday with the 8:45 whey Kara was in front of them. + +8 9 10 11 MR. SCAROLA: I have seen no not • withdrawal. So as we sit here tod y, here are a total of, I think, six irms that are representing Mr. Epst + +12 BY MR. LINK: + +13 14 Q And one reall 4i4ilkodne saw the card on this wee ri The one you + +15 16 17 18 19 20 Okay. I ant to focus on this anxiety. We all have a life, right? I wake up every morning wz h anxiety about something. How my kid's doing co ege. Did he get home last night. Is my ing to get a hit today on the baseball + +21 22 23 24 25 I want to talk about a different kind of anxiety. The anxiety that you feel in November 2017 that relates back to the lawsuit that was filed in December 2009. Can you separate that anxiety that I am talking about? + +1 2 A Just an anxious feeling to get this over with. + +3 4 5 Q And you had that anxious feeling every single day from December 2009 through today November 10th, 2017? + +6 7 8 A The more reminders that I have of the a e, and the fact that there still looms this fals allegation over my head, that is clearly a r. + +9 10 Q You said it looms this false lle ation. What is the false allegation loomi er your head? + +11 12 13 14 A That I was a partici ' a Ponzi scheme hated person in South F 2 We note that this issue does not concern materials claimed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege. + +to overcome C&S's claim of work product protection for materials related to lawsuits where C&S served as counsel despite the fact that its clients were innocent of wrongdoing. + +### I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND + +This appeal arises out of a complex dispute that began when Col sworth, a C&S partner, represented Colombian citizens who sued Drumm Alabama company, in federal court in Alabama, alleging that Drum upported paramilitary groups in Colombia that murdered privat • "z . To provide the necessary context for our discussion, we recoun Colombian citizens' lawsuits against D against Collingsworth and C&S. ant history of the d Drummond's later lawsuit + +### A. Collingsworth and C& esentation of Colombians Suing Drummond + +In his law practice, • gsworth primarily represents victims of human rights abuses. H •oin ;M r&S as a partner to litigate such cases. Although the firm is base I 'thy he worked out of and managed its Washington D.C. office + +While a partner at C&S, Collingsworth filed on behalf of Colombian citizens several lawsuits (the "alien tort cases") against Drummond, which operates coal mines around the world, including in Colombia. The plaintiffs sued Drummond under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, and the Torture Victim Protection + +Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-256, 106 Stat. 73 (1992) (codified at 28 U.S.C. 1350 note), alleging that Drummond hired members of the paramilitary to provide security services around its mines in Colombia and that these individuals, acting as the agents of Drummond, killed civilians in violation of the laws of nations. See generally Doe v. Drummond Co., 782 F.3d 576, 579-81 Cir. 2015). + +Collingsworth acted as the lead C&S attorney in thes a illiam Scherer, the firm's managing partner, and other C&S~CtRl ieys entered appearances in the cases. As managing partner delegated to Collingsworth the authority to litigate the + +To support the claims against nd, Collingsworth developed evidence connecting Drumm° paramilitary's violent actions. He secured testimony from several fo embers of the paramilitary, including Jairo de Jesus Charris, Libardo !It'd e, Jose Gelvez Albarracin, Alcides Manuel Mattos Tabaraes ("S "), and Jhon Jairo Esquivel Cuadrado ("El Tigre"). These witnesses testimony that implicated Drummond. Additionally, Collings rth relied on testimony from Jamie =, who worked as a contractor for Drummond in Colombia. testified that Drummond sent him money that he was directed to use to pay the paramilitary for security services. + +In the alien tort cases, Drummond sought discovery about whether the plaintiffs or their attorneys had paid or given anything of value to these witnesses in exchange for their testimony. In response, the plaintiffs identified three witnesses who had been paid—Chants, Duarte, and Gelvez.3 The plaintiffs claimed these payments were made to provide security to the family n ers of the witnesses who were in danger as a result of the witnesses' to The plaintiffs in the alien tort cases did not identify any payme ade to Samario, El Tigre, or + +Ultimately, Drummond prevailed in eac en tort cases.4 But the dispute between Drummond, on the one &S and Collingsworth, on the other, was only beginning. + +but C would not tiffs also identified a fourth potential witness who received money from C&S, opped paying this potential witness when it determined that he was not credible and used as a witness. + +4 Balcero Giraldo v. Drummond Co., No. 2:09-CV-1041, 2013 WL 3873960 (N.D. Ala. July 25, 2013) (granting summary judgment in favor of Drummond), ard sub nom. Doe v. Drummond Co., 782 F.3d 576 (11th Cir. 2015); Baloco v. Drummond Co., No. 7:09-CV-00557, 2012 WL 4009432 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 12, 2012) (dismissing case in part and granting summary judgment in favor of Drummond), aff'd 767 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir. 2014); Order, Melo Penaloza v. Drummond Co., No. 2:13-cv-393 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2016), ECF No. 59 (dismissing case with prejudice), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, vacated in part, and remanded with instructions 662 F. App'x 673 (11th Cir. 2016). + +### B. Drummond's Defamation Action Against Collingsworth and C&S + +#### 1. Drummond Files a Defamation Action and Seeks Discovery About Witness Payments. + +While the alien tort cases were pending, Collingsworth wrote letters on C&S stationary to the Dutch government and a Japanese company accusing Drummond of supporting paramilitary groups that murdered hundreds of Colomb ens. After Collingsworth sent these letters, Drummond sued Collin d C&S for defamation in federal court in Alabama (the "defamatio 0 cas + +At the beginning of the defamation case, Coll rth and C&S were jointly represented by outside counsel. Beca ingsworth's central role in the underlying litigation and in writing ( i4ciicin, dly defamatory letters, he was the C&S partner primarily responsible wo ' g with outside counsel. In their joint answer, Collingsworth and liability and raised several defenses, including that the statemen e letters were true and that they had not acted maliciously. + +Attegtpt prove that Collingsworth had known the statements in his letter se and that he had acted with malice, Drummond served discovery requests about the methods Collingsworth and his litigation team had used in the alien tort cases to secure testimony from the witnesses, including information about any payments made to the witnesses. Collingsworth and C&S responded that they had previously disclosed all payments made to witnesses, pointing to their disclosures that payments had been made to Charris, Duarte, and Gelvez. In hearings and other filings with the district court, Collingsworth and C&S's outside counsel repeated that only Charris, Duarte, and Gelvez had received payments. + +### 2. Through Discovery, Additional Witness Payments Are Uncovered. + +As it turns out, all of these statements made in discovery were f t Eventually, Collingsworth and C&S admitted that El Tigre, Sam IR, , nd had also received payments. The payments were uncover mmond subpoenaed a law firm that had served as C&S's co- 1 in the alien tort cases. That law firm produced an email showing that orth had asked co-counsel and Scherer for permission to pay appro 00,000 in attorney's fees on behalf in a pending criminal5 As sanctions, Drummond asked the court to enter a default judgment against Collingsworth and rks, hold Collingsworth in contempt of court, and award Drummond its reasonable attorney's fees. + +known about the witness payments and that once he learned of the payments, he made sure that C&S promptly disclosed them to the court. + +Although Collingsworth and Scherer provided this general information, they refused to answer many categories of questions posed in discovery, claiming that the information Drummond sought was protected by the attorney-clie vilege or the attorney work product doctrine. For example, Collingswo sed to answer questions regarding communications about the wi ss p ents that he had had with Ivan Otero, a Colombian attorney who as a conduit for payments from C&S to El Tigre and Samarioo,,`9 ep rfy who was involved in drafting the filings in the defamation acti i c ,contained misrepresentations about the witness payments. And Co li tiv 9S 1rth and Scherer refused to answer questions about what caused t slue that they had made inaccurate statements about the witne pa ents or the process that led them to correct their t misstatements, claimi ie information sought was privileged or protected from discovery. D d asked the court to hold that the crime-fraud exception vitiated orth and C&S's claims of attorney-client privilege and work product p • tection. + +### 4. The District Court Applies the Crime-Fraud Exception. + +After a hearing, the district court issued an order applying the crime-fraud exception to both Collingsworth and C&S. In reaching this conclusion, the district court followed our circuit's two-part test for applying the crime-fraud exception and determined that Drummond had (1) made a prima facie showing that Collingsworth and C&S had engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct when seeking the advice of counsel and creating attorney work product in the alien tort and defamation cases and (2) identified categories of communications attorney work product that may not be protected from discovery because ere used to further a crime or fraud. + +C First, the district court pointed to evidence that cCollingsworth and C&S had engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct sought the advice of outside counsel in the defamation case an c attorney work product in both the alien tort and defamation cases. 's ct court determined that the crimefraud exception's first prong aft3fied as to three crimes: fraud on the court, witness bribery, and subort Cg , rjury. The court emphasized that it was not holding that a crime oktittied actually had been committed, but only that a prima facie case h tablished. + +I 1ing that there was a prima facie case of fraud on the court, the district cdirt identified numerous false statements Collingsworth and C&S had made to the court. The court identified misstatements regarding witness payments that Collingsworth had made to the court in the alien tort cases when he was acting as a C&S partner, as well as misstatements that Collingsworth and outside counsel + +had made in the defamation action. The court found that both Collingsworth and C&S had made these false statements knowingly. + +In a lengthy footnote, the district court explained that there was sufficient evidence to find that C&S had knowingly made misstatements. First, the court explained that because Collingsworth was a partner in C&S and was a sil• k for the firm's benefit, his actions and knowledge were attributable to th under agency principles. Second, the court cited evidence show er firm partners and employees, including Scherer, had been of the monthly payments being made to the witnesses and explk it was unbelievable that no one at the firm other than Collingswo eCt 1 own of the payments. + +As for the witness bribery and g perjury crimes, the district court determined that Drummond h 9% shed a prima facie case with evidence that the witnesses add ceived payments from the litigation team under suspicious circumstan Sr. he court once again relied on agency principles to establish the m cie showing that C&S had bribed witnesses and suborned perjury, e g that every action taken by Collingsworth in the case had been in his cap city as a partner and agent of C&S. + +The district court then turned to the second prong of the test, which required a showing that the communication was made or attorney work product was created in furtherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity. Because the court did not + +have before it the specific materials that Collingsworth and C&S claimed were privileged or protected from discovery, in lieu of a document-by-document analysis the court considered whether the categories of discovery Drummond sought were sufficiently related to the allegations of fraud, witness bribery, and suborning perjury. The court found that each category of discovery D identified was sufficiently related to the allegations of fraud on bribery, and suborning perjury. These categories of info ilyt, witness uded: + +- Collingsworth's communications with Ilan attorney who served as the intermedi Tigre and Samario and from van ero, the Colombian ents from C&S to El +- Collingsworth and C&S's wi ing and redaction of documents produced to Drummond i e ation case showing payments to El Tigre and Samario; +- Collingsworth an drafting of pleadings and papers in the alien tort and defa that included misrepresentations regarding the scope, na e, ap extent of witness payments; +- Collings s email informing Scherer and his co-counsel that El Tigre would receive ongoing monthly payments and a as done with the email after it sent; Oingsworth's communications with attorney Paul about itness payments; +- Collin disclosure of payments to El Tigre, Samario, and to outside counsel in the defamation case; +- Collingsworth's payment of \$100,000 to a consulting attorney in Colombia who assisted in obtaining access to prisoners in Colombia in order to interview and depose them in the alien tort cases; + +- Collingsworth's communications with van Bilderbeek regarding payments to I= and +- Collingsworth and C&S's search for documents in the defamation case. + +After determining that the crime-fraud exception may apply, the district court ordered a special to review in camera the documents that Collingsworth and C&S claimed were privileged or protected as ey work product to determine whether each individual document w erance of or closely related to a fraud on the court or crime and the s ould be produced to Drummond. The court also set forth a procedu pecial to assess a it witness's assertion of attorney-client pHs,' a orney work production protection in a deposition. The court that when necessary a witness should give in camera testimo ally ex parte, so that the special could appropriately assess y ilege issues while limiting disclosure only to information used or c ?kr\*in furtherance of the crime or fraud. + +After ex mg why the crime-fraud exception applied, the district court certified rder involved controlling questions of law as to which there may be a subs tial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the litigation. In addressing certification, the district court did not identify the specific controlling questions of law that it believed warranted interlocutory review. + +### 5. A Motions Panel of This Court Granted C&S Permission for an Interlocutory Appeal. + +Collingsworth and C&S filed separate petitions for review with our Court, seeking permission to file interlocutory appeals from the district court's order. A motions panel denied Collingsworth's petition. A separate motions panel granted A C&S's petition as to the following two questions: + +- 1. Can agency principles be used to impute the app S5n f the crime-fraud exception to an agent's prin ere the principal has separately-held privileges as a c u ef= ndant in the suit and there is no finding that the exce les directly to the principal? +- 2. Can agency principles be used t the application of the crime-fraud exception to an a: cipal where the agent is operating as an attorney an' s no finding that the client's behavior triggered the ud exception or that the exception applies e principal? + +#### H. BACKGROUND ATTORNEY WO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, CT DOCTRINE, AND CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION + +The issues in th 1 center on how the attorney-client privilege, attorney work produc e, and crime-fraud exception apply to a partnership and what role, if a Icy principles play in the application of the crime-fraud exception. To prow context for these issues, we pause for background on the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine, as well as the crime-fraud exception. + +The attorney-client privilege attaches, of course, to confidential communications between an attorney and client for the purposes of securing legal advice or assistance.6 See In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d 1223, 1224 (11th Cir. 1987). The purpose of the privilege is "to encourage full and communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promo oader public interests in the observance of law and administration of jtyS United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 562 (1989) (internal quotatio mitted). + +Attorney work product protection extends to 1 obtained or prepared by counsel in the course of their legal duties p ACV t the work was done with an eye toward litigation.See Fed. R Civ r\ 3)(A); Cox v. Adm'r U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1421-22 1 Ci . 1994). Work product protection prevents most inquiries into at s work files and mental impressions. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U. C49 I, 510 (1947). The purpose of this protection is to t protect the integrity o adversary process by allowing a lawyer to work "with a + +6 Th ets of attorney-client communications claimed to be privileged that are potential' t n this appeal. First, there are communications between C&S and its clients in Colo alien tort cases. Second, there are communications between C&S and its outside nse in the defamation case. In the first category, C&S is serving as the attorney; in the second &S is the client. With respect to the attorney-client privilege, as opposed to the protections for attorney work product, Drummond seeks discovery of attorney-client privileged materials only from the defamation case—that is, Drummond seeks to use the crime-fraud exception to pierce the attorney-client privilege only with respect to communications where C&S was the client. We thus do not address whether the crime-fraud exception could apply to privileged communications between C&S and its clients in Colombia, who are not alleged to have participated in any wrongdoing. + +7 With respect to attorney work product, Drummond seeks to discover materials from both the alien tort and defamation cases that C&S claims are protected. + +certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by opposing parties and their counsel." Id. + +But the protection afforded to work product is not absolute. Discovery may be had into factual work product upon a party showing "substantial need for the materials to prepare its case" and that it "cannot, without undue hardsl btain their substantial equivalent by other means." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Greater protection is given to the attorney's opinion work product aterials containing "the mental impressions, conclusions, op i ' or legal theories of a party's attorney or other representative concern'4 c igation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(B). Such materials "enjoy[] a n r s ute immunity and can be discovered only in very rare and extra circumstances." Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422 (internal quotation mar lst ) + +The crime-fraud exc Ctio , allows a party—in rare circumstances—to obtain t discovery that °therm r iould be protected by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney wor, t doctrine. The crime-fraud exception applies when a twopart test i ed: + +there must be a prima facie showing that the client was engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct when he sought the advice of counsel, that he was planning such conduct when he sought the advice of counsel, or that he committed a crime or fraud subsequent to receiving the benefit of counsel's advice. Second, there must be a showing that the attorney's assistance was obtained in furtherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity or was closely related to it. + +In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d at 1226. Stated simply, the crime-fraud exception removes the "seal of secrecy" from attorney-client communications or work product materials when they are made in furtherance of an ongoing or future crime or fraud. Zolin, 491 U.S. at 563; see Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422 (recognizing that the crime-fraud exception "applies to work-product in the same way applies to the attorney-client privilege"). When the crime-fraud excepti 0 ;es, an attorney's opinion work product is discoverable. Cox, 17 F a 2. With these principles in mind, we now turn to the questions rais is appeal. + +### III. SCOPE OF 1NTERLOCUTORk UNDER § 1292 + +The federal courts of appeals "have ' \* ' iN6n of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the tes." 28 U.S.C. § 1291. "A final decision is one by which a dis disassociates itself from the case . . . ." Doe No. I v. United States d 999, 1004 (11th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). It "e> a litigation on the merits and leaves nothing more for the court to dob xecute the judgment." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "Discov are ordinarily not fmal orders that are immediately appealable." A s Id. + +There are, however, exceptions to the rule that only final decisions are appealable. We have discretion to hear interlocutory appeals from district court orders under the certification procedure in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b): + +When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order. The Court of Appeals which would have jurisdiction of an appeal of such action may thereupon, in its discretion, permit an appeal t be taken from such order, if application is made to it within ten days er the entry of the order .. .. + +28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We have explained that when deciding S o .- permit an appeal under § 1292(b) after a district court has entered an certifying the appeal and a party has filed a timely application f ion to appeal, we are considering not whether we have jurisdictio e appeal but instead whether to exercise our discretion and ). See McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 381 F.3d 1251, 125 2004). + +Our precedent identi ) 1 principles to guide us when deciding whether to exercise o disc r ion under § 1292(b) to allow for a rare interlocutory appeal. Id. at 1 eneral, we exercise our discretion only when (1) the appeal pre pure question of law, (2) the question is controlling of at least a subs of the case, (3) the district court identifies the question in its order, (4) there are substantial grounds for differences of opinion on the question, and (5) resolution of the question may reduce the amount of litigation necessary on remand. Id. But even if all of these factors are present, we still have discretion to disallow the appeal. See id. + +After considering these guiding principles, we conclude that the motions panel improvidently granted permission to appeal, vacate in part that earlier order, and decline to exercise our discretion to decide the first question presented in this appeal. Paraphrased, the first question asks whether a court may apply the crimefraud exception to a partnership by imputing to the partnership the act' and knowledge of a partner. C&S argues that the district court impr used agency principles to impute Collingsworth's intent to commit a fra o e to C&S in determining that a crime or fraud occurred and that t vant communications or work product were made in furtherance of that + +At first blush, the core issue of wh i applying the crime-fraud exception, a court may impute a patti appears to raise a purely legal But C&S concedes that in some circumstances, such as wh C a y s managing partner or partner charged with responsibility to make td ecisions at issue participates in the fraud, a partner's intent may to the partnership. So it cannot be that this appeal presents the abs ly legal issue whether agency principles ever may be used to impute a er's knowledge and intent to a partnership for purposes of applying the crime-fraud exception. A\iin wledge and intent to a partnership + +Instead, C&S seeks in effect to have us review whether, given the nature of Collingsworth's relationship with the firm, the record supported the district court's application of agency principles to impute his intent and actions to C&S. This question is not purely one of law about whether agency principles can be imputed for the purpose of applying the crime-fraud exception. + +To the contrary, the question posed here requires a fact-specific inquiry into whether the evidence in this case—which showed, at a minimum, that Collingsworth was the C&S partner to whom Scherer, the mana rtner, had delegated responsibility for the alien tort cases and who als se s the primary point of contact for the firm's outside counsel in the lion cases—is sufficient to support the application of agency 11 in the crime-fraud context. To answer it would require the c the case and thus to take a deep dive i i's 'case's voluminous record. The purpose of § 1292(b) is not to i(c?i nterlocutory appellate review of such factdriven issues. See McFarl 3 1 .3d at 1262. Accordingly, we conclude that permission to appeal issue was improvidently granted, and we decline to exercise our n to hear an interlocutory appeal related to the first question. ply law to the particular facts of + +### IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS + +ow turn to the second question raised in this appeal, which we do exercise our discretion to answer. To clarify the question, we rephrase it slightly as follows: + +Can the crime-fraud exception be applied to overcome attorney work product protection when the attorney or law firm was engaged in the crime or fraud but the client was not? + +With this question, C&S in effect seeks to bar the disclosure of work product materials created in the alien tort actions, claiming that because its clients in those cases were innocent of any wrongdoing, work product protection is m3iukted AS despite the firm's participation in the wrongdoing, + +We hold that the district court properly concluded th Qe1e-fraud exception may be applied because illegal or fraudule duct by an attorney alone may suffice to overcome attorney work p tection.9 We have previously recognized that in cases of att onduct there is no protection for the attorney's work product. See a t . Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262, 1271 (11th Cir. 1983). In Parrott, a party that his attorney's secret recordings of conversations with two wi ess were protected from discovery as work product. Id. at 1270-71. We di tr,a, concluding that because the attorney's clandestine recordings w ical,I9 regardless of whether they were work product, they + +case. in, this issue relates only to materials from the alien tort cases, not the defamation + +9 We review de novo a question certified for interlocutory review under § 1292(b). v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 148 F.3d 1228, 1229 n.3 (11th Cir. 1998). + +10 At the time we decided Parrott, an ABA opinion concluded that it was unethical for an attorney to make a clandestine recording, even when such recording was legal under state law. 707 F.2d at 1271 n.19 (11th Cir. 1983). That ABA opinion has since been withdrawn. See ABA Comm. on Ethics and Prof, Responsibility, Formal Op. 01-422 (2001). We express no opinion whether an attorney who makes a clandestine recording today acts unethically. + +were not protected. We relied on a D.C. Circuit decision recognizing that "in some circumstances, a lawyer's unprofessional conduct may vitiate" the protection afforded to attorney work product. Id. (quoting Moody v. I.R.S., 654 F.2d 795, 799-801 (D.C. Cir. 1981). The D.C. Circuit explained in Moody that "[a]n attorney should not be able to exploit [work product protection] for ends outsid o and antithetical to the adversary system any more than a client who to use the privilege to advance criminal or fraudulent ends." Moody, at 800. Based on this rationale, an attorney may not exploit work p protection when she / 6 \ engages in illegal conduct or a fraud upon the court even if her client is innocent!' Of course, for the crime-fraud exception , I court must find that the specific document or testimony that is ordering to be produced reflects work of the attorney that was r dinfiutherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity or that csely related to it. + +t To support its c ory position, C&S cites several cases holding that an innocent die s ilege cannot be overcome by the crime-fraud exception. But most of es consider the scope of the attorney-client privilege rather than + +II Our conclusion today is consistent with the holdings of other circuits that the crimefraud exception may vitiate the protection afforded attorney work product in cases where an attorney commits a crime or fraud. See In re Impounded Case (Law Finn), 879 F.2d 1211, 1213- 14 (3d Cir. 1989) (allowing crime-fraud exception to overcome work product protection for "materials relating solely to possible criminal activity of [a] law firrn"); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir. 1981) (concluding that fraud exception allowed disclosure of work product when the lawyer, not client, was alleged to have engaged in the fraud). + +the relationship between the crime-fraud exception and the attorney work product doctrine. Moody, the case on which we relied in Parrott, warrants further discussion, however. + +In Moody, the D.C. Circuit recognized that the work product doctrine "create[d] a legally protectable interest in non-disclosure in two parti 1wyer and client." 654 F.2d at 801. The D.C. Circuit explained that "the li ion that an attorney has no right to object to the disclosure of work pro oche possible by his misconduct does not necessarily mean that the w duct privilege is inapplicable to such documents" because "the c • erest in preventing disclosures about his case may survive th e of his representation by an unscrupulous attorney." Id. C&S relies is reasoning to argue that the crimefraud exception may not be usiQ rce work product protection when the underlying client is irmoce Cbe i se the innocent client may still invoke the doctrine. + +'4 1.4r. We di ith C&S's position. Moody went on to explain that to deter= er an innocent client may rely on the work product doctrine to shield rials after his attorney engaged in a crime or a fraud, "[a] court must look to all the circumstances of the case ... to decide whether the policy favoring disclosure outweighs the client's legitimate interest in secrecy" and prevent disclosure when it "would traumatize the adversary process more than the + +underlying legal misbehavior." Id. Rather than adopting a blanket rule that the crime-fraud exception does not apply when there is an innocent client, the D.C. Circuit adopted a balancing test to weigh the client's interest in secrecy against the reasons for disclosure. Because we agree with the D.C. Circuit's application of this balancing test, the crime-fraud exception may apply to work prod attorney but not her client is accused of misconduct.12 We there argument that the client's innocence is an absolute bar to p orney work product protection through the crime-fraud exception hen the eCA lect C&S's + +We resolve the pure legal issue presen • terlocutory appeal by holding that the crime-fraud exception 4\m a plied to eliminate work product + +12 To support its position tha a e-fraud exception cannot apply to overcome work product protection when a client C&S also points to several decisions holding that an innocent attorney may invoke ork p ct protection even if his client committed a crime or fraud using his services. See, e. e Grand Jury Proceedings #5 Empanelled Jan. 28, 2004, 401 F.3d 247, 252 (4th C 005) "[T]hose seeking to overcome the opinion work product privilege (using the crim exception] must make a prima facie showing that the attorney in question was awar or a owing participant in the criminal conduct" (internal quotation marks omitted)). rding to C&S, because an innocent attorney may continue to rely on the attorney wo ct octrine when his client engaged in a crime or fraud, the converse must also be • ent client may invoke work product protection even if her attorney commi e or fraud while providing services. We disagree. C&S's position would, in effect, gi an innocent client a right to veto any application of the crime-fraud exception to his attorney's ork product. We cannot agree that a client's interest in preventing disclosures about his case means that the crime-fraud exception may never apply when the attorney, not the client, engaged in misconduct. Instead, a court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the policies favoring disclosure of such materials outweigh the client's legitimate interest in secrecy in a particular case. + +13 To the extent that C&S disagrees with the district court's application of the crime-fraud exception under the facts of this case, it would be quibbling with the way that the district court balanced the clients' interests in secrecy against the need for disclosure in these particular circumstances, which would not raise a pure issue of law appropriate for review under § I292(b). + +protection based on attorney misconduct when the client is innocent. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.14 + +### V. CONCLUSION + +Regarding the first question certified on appeal, we decline to exercise our discretion to answer whether agency principles may be used to apply fraud exception under the facts of this case. We will not answer 1 1 "estion because it does not present a purely legal question. This C , ier order granting permission to appeal is vacated as improvid ted as to that question, and permission to appeal on that ques ied. + +Regarding the second question ce 'peal, we conclude that the crime-fraud exception may in appro a es be applied to overcome work product protection based on a rrje sconduct, even if the attorney's client is innocent of any wrongdoin o. A ordingly, we affirm the district court's order on the crime-fraud excep + +ricSI + +'....) + +14On remand, under the district court's order, the special will perform an in camera review of certain categories of documents that C&S and Collingsworth contend are protected by the attorney client privilege or work product protection. To conclude that the crime-fraud exception applies to require disclosure of any specific document, the special must find that the document either (1) reflects a communication used to further a crime or fraud or was closely related to it or (2) was created to further a crime or fraud or was closely related to it. See Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422; In re Grand Jury Investigation, 842 F.2d at 1227. + +Question 1 is **DECLINED**, the earlier order granting permission to appeal is **VACATED**, and the petition for permission to review is **DENIED**. + +Question 2 is **ANSWERED**. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2a015ba08cbf81b46cd1b7d57a17982f1526b77 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/EFTA02768436.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,14706 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 258, + "chars": 592245, + "elapsed_seconds": 136.06, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_23_Picture_86.jpeg", + "_page_214_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_215_Picture_10.jpeg", + "_page_216_Picture_197.jpeg", + "_page_219_Picture_18.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY a t i3 TEIN'S a MOTION\nFOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECT 0 E-MAILS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.552, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 464.50800000000004, + 346.10302734375 + ], + [ + 150.552, + 346.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PREFACE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 339.42242431640625, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 339.42242431640625, + 197.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 197.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN CAMERA REVIEW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 371.5509033203125, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 371.5509033203125, + 239.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 239.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 355.28338623046875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 355.28338623046875, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Discovery of Deliberately Concealed E-Mails", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 340.92108154296875, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 340.92108154296875, + 114.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 114.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. la' Deceptively Concealed the E-Mails and Clearly Violated Rule 1.280(b)(6) as \nPreviously Determined by the Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 548.5504760742188, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 548.5504760742188, + 156.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 156.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. The Truth and this Court's Process-Driven \"Level Playing Field\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 446.2679443359375, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 446.2679443359375, + 169.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 169.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.892, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 269.892, + 525.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The ils are Relevant and Directly Controvert Sworn Testimony and \nMisrepresentations to this Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 548.0439453125, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 548.0439453125, + 569.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 569.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. No Binger \"Surprise in Fact\" and Truth and Justice Requires the Courtroom's Light", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 547.128, + 86.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Expressly Waived Work Pr c rotection in 2011 and His Deceptive \nConcealment of the 30 E-Mails on a eta Deficient Privilege Log Violated Florida \nLaw and Court Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 547.9013671875, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 547.9013671875, + 417.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 417.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Waived Any Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection by Voluntary \nDisclosure to a Clear Adversary in the Razorback I.itiv_ation \n\"esei", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 547.6834716796875, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 547.6834716796875, + 300.98114013671875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 300.98114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(8/4/10 Hearing Transcrtp ibit 11.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 270.4886169433594, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 270.4886169433594, + 504.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 504.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Work-Product Protection %Vas Waived by Issue Infection", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 458.1087646484375, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 458.1087646484375, + 86.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 86.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. The Crime-Fraud Exception Applies to Some E-mails", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 385.71697998046875, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 385.71697998046875, + 251.800048828125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 251.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. No Attorney-Client Privilege Exists", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 292.00634765625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 292.00634765625, + 86.362548828125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 86.362548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*LUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.3800048828125, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 431.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 258.3800048828125, + 431.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 307.2325134277344 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 307.2325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.772, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.7612609863281, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.7612609863281, + 87.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.772, + 87.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 338.8427429199219, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 338.8427429199219, + 87.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 87.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 332.90999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 535.5, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 485.18999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 2", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRANSCRIPT 9s AiSkli*NGS v", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 421.1579284667969, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 421.1579284667969, + 364.2131652832031 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 364.2131652832031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 468.18, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 466.34400000000005, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 467.568, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 467.568, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "U.S. District Court \nSouthern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) \nCIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 469.4613952636719, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 469.4613952636719, + 134.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 134.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Petitioner", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 56.304, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 111.93167114257812, + 289.98 + ], + [ + 111.93167114257812, + 304.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 56.304, + 304.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Respondent", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 696.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 119.39688110351562, + 696.5999999999999 + ], + [ + 119.39688110351562, + 712.2325057983398 + ], + [ + 53.855999999999995, + 712.2325057983398 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.0, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 454.104, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 454.104, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 153.0, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANT [REDACTED] EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.132, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 358.02 + ], + [ + 472.464, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 129.132, + 397.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 8", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 467.568, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 467.568, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE . \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.0, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.139404296875, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.139404296875, + 124.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 306.0, + 124.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON OUSTANDING DISCOVERY OTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 442.6878662109375, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 442.6878662109375, + 338.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 338.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 157.95 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 465.12, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 305.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flab.uscourts\u2022S0v", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 417.2999572753906, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 417.2999572753906, + 141.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 194.61599999999999, + 141.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.74, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 369.6562805175781, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 369.6562805175781, + 312.0099182128906 + ], + [ + 241.74, + 312.0099182128906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "rivile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.18072509765625, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.18072509765625, + 77.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 77.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 77.613 + ], + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 77.613 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 474.214, + 77.104 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 77.104 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 79.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 79.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 58, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.584, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.73486328125, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.73486328125, + 77.714111328125 + ], + [ + 298.584, + 77.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer,Jaffe, Weissing,Edwards.Fistos &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.312, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 531.2080078125, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 531.2080078125, + 94.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 246.312, + 94.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.40999999999997, + 38.674 + ], + [ + 497.9148254394531, + 38.674 + ], + [ + 497.9148254394531, + 54.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 316.40999999999997, + 54.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing. \ni Pistos ist Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 55.158 + ], + [ + 551.1366577148438, + 55.158 + ], + [ + 551.1366577148438, + 71.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 71.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer. Jaffe. Weissing,Edwards. Fistos &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.814, + 38.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 551.9862670898438, + 38.44610595703125 + ], + [ + 551.9862670898438, + 71.66650390625 + ], + [ + 262.814, + 71.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Priv I e Lo \u2014Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.806, + 36.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 496.356201171875, + 36.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 496.356201171875, + 53.2864990234375 + ], + [ + 316.806, + 53.2864990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "_,,Jaffe, Weissint Fistes &Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.402, + 53.088 + ], + [ + 549.5037841796875, + 53.088 + ], + [ + 549.5037841796875, + 70.16650390625 + ], + [ + 264.402, + 70.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.41, + 41.144999999999996 + ], + [ + 493.69500000000005, + 41.144999999999996 + ], + [ + 493.69500000000005, + 56.337 + ], + [ + 316.41, + 56.337 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.6, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 494.662, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 494.662, + 53.172 + ], + [ + 317.6, + 53.172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.968, + 38.43 + ], + [ + 504.1285400390625, + 38.43 + ], + [ + 504.1285400390625, + 56.87286376953125 + ], + [ + 319.968, + 56.87286376953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pith/Ileke Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.21799999999996, + 40.68609619140625 + ], + [ + 494.106201171875, + 40.68609619140625 + ], + [ + 494.106201171875, + 57.0364990234375 + ], + [ + 315.21799999999996, + 57.0364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 56.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 547.4967651367188, + 56.06610107421875 + ], + [ + 547.4967651367188, + 73.16650390625 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 73.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer.Jaffe.Weissing,Edwards. Mins&LehrmaD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.735, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 553.6378784179688, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 553.6378784179688, + 75.7965087890625 + ], + [ + 264.735, + 75.7965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.40000000000003, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 497.5, + 41.275000000000006 + ], + [ + 497.5, + 55.879999999999995 + ], + [ + 318.40000000000003, + 55.879999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 69, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.012, + 41.711999999999996 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 41.711999999999996 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 56.879999999999995 + ], + [ + 316.012, + 56.879999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer. Jaffe, Weissin Edwards.Fistos&Leh n", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.814, + 43.677 + ], + [ + 551.3688354492188, + 43.677 + ], + [ + 551.3688354492188, + 77.16650390625 + ], + [ + 262.814, + 77.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer.Jaffe. Weissing.Edwards.Fistos& Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.5, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.9279999999999, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.9279999999999, + 78.27197265625 + ], + [ + 265.5, + 78.27197265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 72, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.394, + 41.145 + ], + [ + 500.5155029296875, + 41.145 + ], + [ + 500.5155029296875, + 58.0364990234375 + ], + [ + 318.394, + 58.0364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 73, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.41, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 497.0096435546875, + 38.613 + ], + [ + 497.0096435546875, + 54.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 316.41, + 54.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer, Jane, weissing, towarcis, ristos a MUIR-TIM]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 74, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.402, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.036, + 42.344 + ], + [ + 551.036, + 75.2041015625 + ], + [ + 264.402, + 75.2041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.61400000000003, + 44.24 + ], + [ + 494.039, + 44.24 + ], + [ + 494.039, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 315.61400000000003, + 58.775999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 76, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.394, + 45.576 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 45.576 + ], + [ + 496.24999999999994, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 318.394, + 60.768 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.235, + 43.608000000000004 + ], + [ + 497.13702392578125, + 43.608000000000004 + ], + [ + 497.13702392578125, + 61.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 313.235, + 61.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane, weissing, ristos & Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 77, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.725, + 60.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 550.756591796875, + 60.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 550.756591796875, + 77.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 257.725, + 77.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 78, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.464, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 492.5096435546875, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 492.5096435546875, + 62.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 310.464, + 62.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 79, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 80, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 77.226 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.226 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.1, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 481.9665222167969, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 481.9665222167969, + 80.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.1, + 80.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Low Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 82, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 480.4665222167969, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 480.4665222167969, + 78.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 78.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 83, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.7086181640625, + 79.41650390625 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.41650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 85, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 86, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.30072021484375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 482.30072021484375, + 82.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 82.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lox\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 87, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.657, + 64.872 + ], + [ + 478.9969999999999, + 64.872 + ], + [ + 478.9969999999999, + 79.5 + ], + [ + 303.657, + 79.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 89, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 481.9075927734375, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 481.9075927734375, + 80.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 80.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 90, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 91, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 480.784, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 480.784, + 79.375 + ], + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 79.375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 92, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 77.73599999999999 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 77.73599999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 93, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 485.433349609375, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 485.433349609375, + 82.66650390625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 82.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 94, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa= Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 95, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 483.7783508300781, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 483.7783508300781, + 80.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 80.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lo \u2014 Dated", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 96, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 478.36799999999994, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 478.36799999999994, + 77.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 77.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lox\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 97, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.512, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 485.4586181640625, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 485.4586181640625, + 79.91650390625 + ], + [ + 304.512, + 79.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 98, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.098, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 77.4541015625 + ], + [ + 306.098, + 77.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 99, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.305, + 63.731 + ], + [ + 486.5096435546875, + 63.731 + ], + [ + 486.5096435546875, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 305.305, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 100, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 482.37600000000003, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 482.37600000000003, + 79.5 + ], + [ + 305.66400000000004, + 79.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pri ile e Lo \u2014 ted 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 101, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.4495544433594, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.4495544433594, + 76.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 76.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege LoA \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 102, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 487.7655029296875, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 487.7655029296875, + 80.91650390625 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 80.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 103, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.665, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 487.1995544433594, + 65.30199999999999 + ], + [ + 487.1995544433594, + 82.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 307.665, + 82.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log-- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 104, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4495544433594, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.4495544433594, + 80.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 80.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Pr ivile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 105, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.484, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 486.8365173339844, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 306.484, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 106, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 484.7086181640625, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 484.7086181640625, + 81.7965087890625 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 81.7965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 107, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.712, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 486.8896484375, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 305.712, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 63.19610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.58856201171875, + 63.19610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.58856201171875, + 79.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 79.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\u2022 Jane, weissing, towarus, riSIOS at Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 108, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.824, + 79.63199999999999 + ], + [ + 537.2710571289062, + 79.63199999999999 + ], + [ + 537.2710571289062, + 96.7965087890625 + ], + [ + 291.824, + 96.7965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 109, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 487.23486328125, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 487.23486328125, + 80.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 306.46000000000004, + 80.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 110, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 77.2965087890625 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 77.2965087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 111, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 77.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 77.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 112, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 482.3465270996094, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 482.3465270996094, + 78.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 78.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 113, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 76.714 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 76.714 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PrivIle e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 114, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 57.51199999999999 + ], + [ + 484.7261962890625, + 57.51199999999999 + ], + [ + 484.7261962890625, + 73.91650390625 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 73.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 115, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.926, + 54.266 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 54.266 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 70.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.926, + 70.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 116, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.752, + 55.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 55.94610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.2261962890625, + 71.91650390625 + ], + [ + 301.752, + 71.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 117, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 484.5695495605469, + 77.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 77.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 118, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 58.69610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.5709533691406, + 58.69610595703125 + ], + [ + 483.5709533691406, + 75.0364990234375 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 75.0364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 119, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 54.81 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 54.81 + ], + [ + 484.55072021484375, + 71.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.12800000000004, + 71.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilefte Loft\u2014Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 120, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 55.44 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 72.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 72.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 121, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 482.8188171386719, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 482.8188171386719, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 122, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 481.76373291015625, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 481.76373291015625, + 78.4920654296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.4920654296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 123, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.719, + 61.207 + ], + [ + 484.33856201171875, + 61.207 + ], + [ + 484.33856201171875, + 78.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.719, + 78.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 124, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 58.869 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 58.869 + ], + [ + 484.5865173339844, + 74.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 74.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1_ sane. weissing. tawaras. tistos a tenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 125, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.765, + 76.2730712890625 + ], + [ + 535.607666015625, + 76.2730712890625 + ], + [ + 535.607666015625, + 96.88592529296875 + ], + [ + 291.765, + 96.88592529296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 126, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.1583557128906, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.1583557128906, + 78.8341064453125 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 78.8341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.1875 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 63.1875 + ], + [ + 482.28759765625, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1... Jaffe, Weissing. S Fistos Kt Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 127, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.08999633789062, + 79.6875 + ], + [ + 535.3866577148438, + 79.6875 + ], + [ + 535.3866577148438, + 95.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 250.08999633789062, + 95.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 128, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 485.77813720703125, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 485.77813720703125, + 75.4541015625 + ], + [ + 305.28000000000003, + 75.4541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 129, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 81.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 81.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 130, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 481.2165222167969, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 481.2165222167969, + 81.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 81.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Prlyilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 131, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 481.566650390625, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 481.566650390625, + 76.9541015625 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 76.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 79.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissingi Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 132, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.56, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 535.0066528320312, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 535.0066528320312, + 96.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 292.56, + 96.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 133, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 480.0695495605469, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 480.0695495605469, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 134, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 483.5709533691406, + 64.77 + ], + [ + 483.5709533691406, + 82.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 82.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 135, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.56499999999994, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.56499999999994, + 76.714 + ], + [ + 306.07500000000005, + 76.714 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 136, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 58.59 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 58.59 + ], + [ + 482.3295593261719, + 76.28997802734375 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 76.28997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 137, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.51, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 477.0, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 300.51, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 138, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.072, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 484.23486328125, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 484.23486328125, + 80.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 304.072, + 80.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 139, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 482.3548583984375, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 482.3548583984375, + 78.0941162109375 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 78.0941162109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 140, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 485.73486328125, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 485.73486328125, + 77.714111328125 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 77.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lou\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 141, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 482.73486328125, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 482.73486328125, + 78.3341064453125 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 78.3341064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 142, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.4267578125, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 482.4267578125, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilexe Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer, Jane, WeISSMR, PISCOS et Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 143, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.245, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 533.459228515625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 533.459228515625, + 95.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 247.245, + 95.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 144, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.375 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 145, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 480.1396484375, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 480.1396484375, + 79.42999267578125 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 79.42999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.11505126953125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.11505126953125, + 81.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 81.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 146, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 79.758 + ], + [ + 535.0692138671875, + 79.758 + ], + [ + 535.0692138671875, + 96.8240966796875 + ], + [ + 291.76500000000004, + 96.8240966796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 147, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.868, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 81.55999755859375 + ], + [ + 304.868, + 81.55999755859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 148, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 481.9495544433594, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 481.9495544433594, + 77.800048828125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log --Laltcl 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 149, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.34599999999995, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 531.186, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 531.186, + 92.27199999999999 + ], + [ + 245.34599999999995, + 92.27199999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 150, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 77.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 77.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 151, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 76.714 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.714 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 152, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 480.1767578125, + 60.768 + ], + [ + 480.1767578125, + 77.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 77.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 153, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 77.348 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 77.348 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1:ivileeLo 3 \u2014", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 154, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 75.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 75.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege L \u2014 Date 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 155, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4495544433594, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Los\u2014 Dated 2-234011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 156, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.485, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 485.0585632324219, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 485.0585632324219, + 80.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.485, + 80.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 157, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.308, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 60.135000000000005 + ], + [ + 479.5759999999999, + 74.061 + ], + [ + 303.308, + 74.061 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 158, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.69, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 62.132 + ], + [ + 480.18, + 76.08 + ], + [ + 303.69, + 76.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo - Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 159, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 485.4267578125, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.89599999999996, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 160, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.102, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 484.2165222167969, + 63.831999999999994 + ], + [ + 484.2165222167969, + 79.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 304.102, + 79.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa\u2014 SS:12-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 161, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.133, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.71209716796875, + 60.672000000000004 + ], + [ + 483.71209716796875, + 76.800048828125 + ], + [ + 302.133, + 76.800048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PrivlleQe Lox-Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 162, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 61.6875 + ], + [ + 481.1995544433594, + 78.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 78.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \nFarmer,Jaffe,Weissing,Edwards,Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 163, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.31599999999997, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 536.8380126953125, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 536.8380126953125, + 97.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 249.31599999999997, + 97.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 164, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 483.0666198730469, + 76.9541015625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 76.9541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 165, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.336, + 58.57611083984375 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 58.57611083984375 + ], + [ + 483.9586181640625, + 74.91650390625 + ], + [ + 303.336, + 74.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e \u2014 Dat 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 166, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 483.6178894042969, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 483.6178894042969, + 79.0465087890625 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 79.0465087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 167, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.1, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4665222167969, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 483.4665222167969, + 79.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 302.1, + 79.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 168, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 477.98799999999994, + 76.593 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 76.593 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 169, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.1, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 302.1, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2013 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 170, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 64.66799999999999 + ], + [ + 477.79499999999996, + 79.25 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 171, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.276, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 478.39599999999996, + 63.6 + ], + [ + 478.39599999999996, + 77.592 + ], + [ + 303.276, + 77.592 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 172, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.93072509765625, + 77.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 77.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 173, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 61.40100000000001 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 75.327 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 75.327 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loy \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 174, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.92, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 479.106201171875, + 63.4 + ], + [ + 479.106201171875, + 80.41650390625 + ], + [ + 298.92, + 80.41650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 175, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.895, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 61.498000000000005 + ], + [ + 478.59000000000003, + 75.446 + ], + [ + 302.895, + 75.446 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Low- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 176, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.276, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 483.1048583984375, + 64.135 + ], + [ + 483.1048583984375, + 79.714111328125 + ], + [ + 303.276, + 79.714111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 480.9586181640625, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 480.9586181640625, + 78.66650390625 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 78.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe.Weissing.Edwards.Fistos&Lehrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 177, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.604, + 78.492 + ], + [ + 534.3562622070312, + 78.492 + ], + [ + 534.3562622070312, + 95.91650390625 + ], + [ + 290.604, + 95.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log- Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 178, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.514, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.5695495605469, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 481.5695495605469, + 78.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 302.514, + 78.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 179, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.544, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 474.81199999999995, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 474.81199999999995, + 75.20799999999998 + ], + [ + 298.544, + 75.20799999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 180, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.754, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.0865173339844, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.0865173339844, + 78.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 299.754, + 78.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 181, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.92, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 480.1909484863281, + 62.766 + ], + [ + 480.1909484863281, + 81.176513671875 + ], + [ + 298.92, + 81.176513671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 182, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.547, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.59299999999996, + 63.10000000000001 + ], + [ + 476.59299999999996, + 76.351 + ], + [ + 300.547, + 76.351 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege to \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 183, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.09200000000004, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 480.0666198730469, + 64.87199999999999 + ], + [ + 480.0666198730469, + 81.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 300.09200000000004, + 81.0841064453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 184, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 475.40999999999997, + 76.59299999999999 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 76.59299999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 185, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.376, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 480.2261962890625, + 61.11 + ], + [ + 480.2261962890625, + 77.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 299.376, + 77.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 186, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.168, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.53759765625, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 478.53759765625, + 77.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 298.168, + 77.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 187, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.926, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 477.1939999999999, + 77.104 + ], + [ + 300.926, + 77.104 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 188, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.544, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 474.81199999999995, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 474.81199999999995, + 75.83999999999999 + ], + [ + 298.544, + 75.83999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 189, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.752, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 482.5331115722656, + 63.63 + ], + [ + 482.5331115722656, + 80.16650390625 + ], + [ + 301.752, + 80.16650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 190, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.752, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.2933349609375, + 61.74000000000001 + ], + [ + 481.2933349609375, + 77.5364990234375 + ], + [ + 301.752, + 77.5364990234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 191, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 58.775999999999996 + ], + [ + 478.9665222167969, + 74.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 299.33799999999997, + 74.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.547, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.05072021484375, + 61.936 + ], + [ + 480.05072021484375, + 78.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 300.547, + 78.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. ristos & Lenrman", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 192, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.445, + 78.368 + ], + [ + 533.0780029296875, + 78.368 + ], + [ + 533.0780029296875, + 95.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 289.445, + 95.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 193, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.305, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.0096435546875, + 64.03399999999999 + ], + [ + 482.0096435546875, + 79.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 301.305, + 79.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011 \ntarmer, Jane, weissine. i ristos a cerirrnan", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 194, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.934, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 534.5311279296875, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 534.5311279296875, + 95.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 246.934, + 95.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 195, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 480.9761962890625, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 480.9761962890625, + 77.91650390625 + ], + [ + 300.13199999999995, + 77.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 196, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 482.4586181640625, + 61.401 + ], + [ + 482.4586181640625, + 77.91650390625 + ], + [ + 301.71999999999997, + 77.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 197, + "polygon": [ + [ + 310.464, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 492.9267578125, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 492.9267578125, + 60.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 310.464, + 60.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loa \u2014 23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 198, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.88, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 490.6820983886719, + 44.73 + ], + [ + 490.6820983886719, + 61.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 308.88, + 61.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 199, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.248, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.8979999999999, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 489.8979999999999, + 60.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 311.248, + 60.03999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 200, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.88, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 487.87199999999996, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 487.87199999999996, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 308.88, + 60.480000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Lo \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 201, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.442, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3195495605469, + 45.50399999999999 + ], + [ + 494.3195495605469, + 62.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 312.442, + 62.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 202, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.168, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 63.0 + ], + [ + 475.20000000000005, + 76.86 + ], + [ + 300.168, + 76.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 203, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 475.007, + 61.304 + ], + [ + 475.007, + 75.83999999999999 + ], + [ + 298.96099999999996, + 75.83999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privileee Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 204, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.75, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.0865173339844, + 63.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 477.0865173339844, + 79.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 297.75, + 79.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 205, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 473.02500000000003, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 473.02500000000003, + 77.226 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 77.226 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 206, + "polygon": [ + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 474.61499999999995, + 65.405 + ], + [ + 474.61499999999995, + 79.375 + ], + [ + 299.71500000000003, + 79.375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 207, + "polygon": [ + [ + 297.375, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 473.421, + 63.199999999999996 + ], + [ + 473.421, + 77.104 + ], + [ + 297.375, + 77.104 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 208, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.92, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 474.615, + 63.300000000000004 + ], + [ + 474.615, + 77.226 + ], + [ + 298.92, + 77.226 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Loft\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 209, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.8896484375, + 64.566 + ], + [ + 477.8896484375, + 81.17999267578125 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 81.17999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log\u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 210, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.125, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 62.034000000000006 + ], + [ + 479.08856201171875, + 78.66650390625 + ], + [ + 298.125, + 78.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privile e Lo \u2014 Dated -23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 211, + "polygon": [ + [ + 298.584, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 480.1888122558594, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 480.1888122558594, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 298.584, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Privilege Log \u2014 Dated 2-23-2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 212, + "polygon": [ + [ + 295.416, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.93072509765625, + 60.480000000000004 + ], + [ + 475.93072509765625, + 76.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 295.416, + 76.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 213, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 487.15200000000004, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 487.15200000000004, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 11", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 218, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 484.70400000000006, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 484.70400000000006, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 222, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.848, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 229, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 486.54, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 124.23600000000002, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS \nFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 230, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 455.927978515625, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 455.927978515625, + 180.50091552734375 + ], + [ + 156.67200000000003, + 180.50091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 233, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.60321044921875, + 167.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.60321044921875, + 185.51043701171875 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 185.51043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Collingsworth and C& esentation of Colombians Suing \nDrummond", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 233, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 420.39 + ], + [ + 488.7107238769531, + 420.39 + ], + [ + 488.7107238769531, + 455.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 455.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Drummond's Defamation Action Against Collingsworth and C&S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.7655029296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 505.7655029296875, + 89.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 89.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Drummond Files a Defamation Action and Seeks Discovery About \nWitness Payments.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 236, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 100.0787353515625 + ], + [ + 523.3753662109375, + 100.0787353515625 + ], + [ + 523.3753662109375, + 132.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 106.48799999999999, + 132.63043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Through Discovery, Additional Witness Payments Are Uncovered.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 237, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.4690551757812, + 166.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 523.4690551757812, + 185.00091552734375 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 185.00091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Drummond Seeks Sanctions and Raises the Crime-Fraud Exception.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 239, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 530.1917114257812, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 530.1917114257812, + 152.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 152.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. The District Court Applies the Crime-Fraud Exception.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 240, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 457.56280517578125, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 457.56280517578125, + 635.8804168701172 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 635.8804168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "5. A Motions Panel of This Court Granted C&S Permission for an \nInterlocutory Appeal.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.658935546875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 503.658935546875, + 104.51043701171875 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 104.51043701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. BACKGROUND \nATTORNEY WO \nATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, \nCT DOCTRINE, AND CRIME-FRAUD \nEXCEPTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 245, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 522.0499267578125, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 522.0499267578125, + 479.13043212890625 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 479.13043212890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. SCOPE OF 1NTERLOCUTORk UNDER \u00a7 1292", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 248, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.1, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 504.92169189453125, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 504.92169189453125, + 346.2509460449219 + ], + [ + 107.1, + 346.2509460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 251, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 390.0736389160156, + 554.85 + ], + [ + 390.0736389160156, + 572.1304168701172 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 572.1304168701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "V. CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 256, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 374.73779296875, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 374.73779296875, + 153.63043212890625 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 153.63043212890625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 123 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 220 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 95, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 96, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 97, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 98, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 99, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 100, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 126 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 101, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 68 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 102, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 103, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 104, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 105, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 139 + ], + [ + "Line", + 66 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 106, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 107, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 135 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 108, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 109, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 110, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 111, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 124 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 112, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 113, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 114, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 115, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 116, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 117, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 118, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 119, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 120, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 121, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 122, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 123, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 124, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 125, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 126, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 127, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 128, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 129, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 130, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 131, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 132, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 133, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 134, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 135, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 136, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 137, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 138, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 139, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 140, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 141, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 142, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 143, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 144, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 145, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 146, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 147, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 148, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 149, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 150, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 151, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 152, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 153, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 154, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 125 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 155, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 156, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 157, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 158, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 159, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 160, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 128 + ], + [ + "Line", + 64 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 161, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 162, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 163, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 164, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 165, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 166, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 167, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 168, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 169, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 170, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 171, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 172, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 173, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 174, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 175, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 176, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 177, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 178, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 179, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 180, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 181, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 182, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 183, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 184, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 185, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 186, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 187, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 188, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 189, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 190, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 191, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 192, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 193, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 194, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 195, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 196, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 197, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 198, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 199, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 200, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 201, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 202, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 203, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 204, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 205, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 206, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 207, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 208, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 209, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 106 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 210, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 211, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 212, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 213, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 214, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 215, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 497 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 216, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 168 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 217, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 218, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 219, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 220, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 221, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 1096 + ], + [ + "Line", + 133 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 222, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 223, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 224, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 225, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 226, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 227, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 228, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 229, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 230, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 231, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 232, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 233, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 234, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 235, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 236, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 237, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 238, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 239, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 240, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 241, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 242, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 243, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 244, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 245, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 246, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 247, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 248, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 249, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 250, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 251, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 252, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 253, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 254, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 255, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 256, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 257, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768436" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_214_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_214_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5059712651a5544b65e4719fe611e943c008d4d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_214_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:15e280af41e821ad99e73dfc7885c10f427d27f143e573bfeb18bf55c6b32cbc +size 9960 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_215_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_215_Picture_10.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85fa69fd71d7608d17cbe455fc3e7f505e84ef7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_215_Picture_10.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f8b9a988fa9ebc8e75ff3635e448392320ccc5205b1475cc9a9424530fc5252c +size 5872 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_216_Picture_197.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_216_Picture_197.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11405f7aa7ec2fdaa34245b2f1537cd9a9f32065 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_216_Picture_197.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d0a90257ec91b387f42edcdf53f3d757dce75707c8505259cb8bad2b0c45c6b5 +size 5635 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_219_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_219_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c8eeab12e8cf641af7a3330bc294a271c8bee8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_219_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:354f56f213cbee60b88b3f9c056b6b9a0e75b477a2c3ae6d40e089d3b9277c6d +size 12757 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_23_Picture_86.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_23_Picture_86.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..155e5bd8685398c99fee969278cf27ae04a1bb83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768436/_page_23_Picture_86.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c4609b22622f1215fbd76fce6f9546ba6f7fe05294cc0488d875c3a65d6c206 +size 10857 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..441b9746fe4be8ca9467cd67cce12bf991fbec3a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., Individually, + +Defendants. + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the ' d has cancelled the following hearing: + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION 0 ING + +DATE: November 20, 2018 /< 1 ' + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable Don i6) e + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Hi , West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 10.1216 + +SPECIFIC Camera TO BE HEARD: Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for an In of 0 E-Mails. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of November, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +DAVID P. VITALE JR. +Florida Bar No.: 115179 +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +fl dv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. a Esquire staffefile@patlitojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Phone: (954).524-2820 + +46c + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire O 11 jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +AAC /S9C 14/ Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppell t w. m Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for + +Berard Rockenbach, kara@linkrocklaw. ; t dez®flaci vi I law .com Link & Rockenb: P.A. 1555 Palm B Blvd., Suite 301 West Pahn L 33409 Phone: (5 .600 Fax: ( 3601 Attorneys Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; Angela®IinIcrocklaw.com; Tanya®IinIcrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, PA. + +Milady. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +A g \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edf9167268d48e562e1cbc8c7c258b972c8ab73a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694/EFTA02768694.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768694.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2885, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION 0 ING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 433.9081115722656, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 433.9081115722656, + 315.85247802734375 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 315.85247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.384, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 359.4975891113281, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 359.4975891113281, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 264.384, + 140.94 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 204 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768694" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0bd0d858c8970335e696407a1e117e9c14853776 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +J. J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M., Individually + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +2013:01 21 EM 9:34 + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO +DEFENDANT, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] EXPERT INTERROGATORIES AND +REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.340(e) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Notice of Serving Answers to Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 and Request to Produce Expert Reports numbered 14-16 bearing certificate of service date of September 16, 2010. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HERE [REDACTED] CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this 18 day of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Jo h . Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +P.A. + +901 Poin + +777 South Flagler West Palm Florida 33401 Telepho 802-9044 Facsi 802-9976 + +for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ -defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..288e97b74a08173e022fd533d019dbb2778983f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698/EFTA02768698.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768698.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1684, + "elapsed_seconds": 114.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.426, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 314.426, + 139.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] EXPERT INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.19399999999999, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 511.70099999999996, + 345.06 + ], + [ + 511.70099999999996, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 86.19399999999999, + 385.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 509.49 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 523.26 + ], + [ + 216.09199999999996, + 523.26 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768698" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67f70b2eb579cdea0309c27d81ab95ce69455b92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.md @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040804DOCOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., Defendant(s). Go + +## NOTICE OF Nttli E + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED dersigned has called up for hearing the V following: + +DATE: November 26, 201 "S ale' + +TIME: + +JUDGE: 8:45 am. V Honorable d Hafele + +PLACE: r 20 "CSDixi / Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM it: + +## SPE TTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion to Compel [filed 2.26.18] Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Admissions + +.., or by e Movant's attorney has spoken in person' or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised + +adv. Epstien Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the motion are self represented. Acen Njr + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forego! t via E-Serve fer-jl to all Counsel on the attached list, this -/ day of a l/ • + ++6s + +JA + +Fl Bar No.: 169440 + +ey E-Mail: jsx@searcvlaw.com; and cann@searcylaw.com + +rimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com earcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686.6300 + +Fax: 561-3 1.1 + +Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstien +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +### **COUNSEL LIST** + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +[REDACTED] § adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +adv. Epstien Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +-Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +fs..) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86996d7d27ccea1c36c5526a5f41635fcd4b8652 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700/EFTA02768700.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768700.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4945, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.025390625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.025390625, + 116.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF Nttli E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.516, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 370.87199999999996, + 364.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 240.516, + 364.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPE TTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 282.89031982421875, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 282.89031982421875, + 585.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 585.1125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768700" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..378fcb4b2ead276b54d04a0d8450d93ab11c9c3f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), A + +J. individually, and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, OS L.M., C + +vs. + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF tisr.AR + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +±)- DATE: November 27, 20 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable 1f ld Hafele + +PLACE: 20 ixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #; + +## SPECIFz MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and in Limine of Unrelated Settlements + +i or lima Movant's attorney has spoken in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve or narrow the issues raised. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +> Movant's attorney has attempted to speak in person or by telephone with the attorney(s) for all parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion. + +> One or more of the parties who may be affected by the rise% are self represented. + +e I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoi to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6Th —day of 'V 201 t via E-Serve + ++ok + +Ru A ;I Bar No.: 169440 v rneyE-Mail: jsx@searcvlaw.com; and Ldmccarin@searcylaw.com rimary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com earcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-31, Attorneys for + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disabilitv who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 da»; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Ad Coordinator, por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn tajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nao tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou ge woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +Rev: 8/20/15 + +pb.) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..480ecfbc48c9309edcdc103a00f25f6d9d3fe642 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705/EFTA02768705.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768705.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4857, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF tisr.AR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.68, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 369.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 369.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFz MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 575.0999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.7282409667969, + 575.0999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.7282409667969, + 590.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 590.7324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 149.85000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768705" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e2f9d9f583a6d5827aac4e7dbc44b08efaca9f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.md @@ -0,0 +1,845 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1.1t. IEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE (Modified in accordance with the Cou Ac O) I K'S EXHIBIT LIST er 2, 2018, rulings) + +A Cos + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein he likthe exhibits that he may introduce at the December 4, 2018, trial of this matter. Eps his right to amend this list once the Court makes a final determination on his request-for in camera review of Counter-Plaintiff alleged privilege docum cal + +- 0. No Objection +- 1. All objections +- 2. All obj ecci \*eons, except authenticity +- 3. Irrelev or immaterial +- 4. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (403) +- 5. Privileged +- 6. Opinion +- 7. Hearsay +- 8. Authenticity lacking +- 9. Other (please identify basis of objection) + +| No. | Date | | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| | | Jeffi-ey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, | J. | +| | 12/7/09 | Complaint with Exhibits | | +| 2 | 12/21/09 | Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant | J. | +| 3 | 8/2/10 | | | +| 4 | 3/27/12 | Notice of Appearance of | J. | +| 5 | 7/31/12 | tein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to | | +| 6 | 8/16/12 | Notice of Volun | Dismissal Without Prejudice | +| | | of J. | | +| 7 | 1/9/13 | J. | Fourth Amended | +| 8 | 9/25/13 | Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein | | +| 9 | 6/30/17 | Affidavit of Jeffre E stem | | +| 10 | 6/30/17 | Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summ | | +| | | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothst | 0' J. and L.M. | +| | | 15th Judicial Circuit Case | 5 0 9-CA-040800XXXXMB | +| | | Deposition T | ns is and Statements | +| 11 | 3/23/10 | Deposition Transcri | die J. | +| 12 | 5/15/13 | Deposition Tmnsc | o ley J. | +| 13 | 10/10/13 | Deposition T | of radle J. | +| 14 | 11/10/17 | Deposition T | ri t f J | +| 15 | 3/17/10 | Deposition T | t of Jeffrey Epstein | +| 16 | 1/25/12 | D sit | ranscn t of Jeffre E stem | +| 17 | 6/14/12 | De siti | nscript of Scott Rothstein | +| 18 | 4/20/11 | sitio | ranscript of S. Adler | +| 19 | 5/25/11 | on Transcript of Abraxas | Discala | +| 20 | 2/11 | position Transcript of | Kretschmar | +| 21 | | De sition Transcript of Michael Le amaro | | +| 22 | 10/1 | 7 Deposition Transcript of E.W. | | +| 23 | 12/1/ 7 | Deposition Transcript of Bernard Jansen | | +| 24 | | Withdrawn | | +| 25 | | Stricken | | +| 26 | 4/7/11 | Audio of | and Jack Scarola's | +| 27 | 5/17/11 | Notice of Filing Transcript of | | + +| No. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 | Date 4/12/10 5/11/10 5/11/10 6/21/10 7/7/10 4/7/11 5/5/11 5/16/11 6/10/11 12/9/11 1/6/12 1/6/12 2/21/13 7/25/13 8/11/17 9/5/17 10/5/ 7 | Description Objection Marked Marked in for Id. Evidence Withdrawn Withdrawn Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, J. and L.M. 151h Written Discove Estein's R uest to Produce to Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production Estein's R uest for Admissions to Response to First Request for Admissions i.'s Est Request for Production to Edw Response to Epstein's Requ Produce dated April 7, 2011 Interrogatories to Edw li ein's n Answers to Interro E stein's Second Request f t rop tton to Answers to rd Set of Interro tones CC Res uest for Production Sup Iemen Response to Epstein's Request for P ion dated December 9, 2011 Edward ponse to Epstein's Request for Producti June 25, 2013 ards' nswers to Interrogatories 's Request for Production to sio tories | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 47 | 1 | Response to Epstein's September 5, 2017, Request for Production | +| 48 | 10/13/17 | Epstein's Request to Produce to | +| 49 | 10/13/17 | E.stein's Ex. rt Interro: tones to | +| 50 | 11/13/17 | Answers to Epstein's Expert Interrogatories | +| 51 | 11/13/17 | Response to Epstein's Request to Produce re Experts | +| 52 | N/D | Privilege Log — Emails November 2009 to August 2010 | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| FBI Reports / Statements | | | | | | +| 53 | 4/24/07 | Transcript of Taped Statement of L.M. | | | | +| 54 | | Stricken | | | | +| 55 | 8/7/07
8/14/07 | FBI reports for interview of E.W. | | | | +| 56 | | Stricken | | | | +| 57 | | Stricken | | | | +| L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028051XXXXMB | | | | | | +| 58 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 59 | 9/11/08 | Complaint | | | | +| 60 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 61 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | | +| 62 | 4/7/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | | +| 63 | 8/11/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Production to Defendant | | | | +| 64 | 8/12/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – Greens Pharmacy | | | | +| 65 | 8/14/09 | Notice of Production from Non-Party – [REDACTED] Pharmacy | | | | +| 66 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | | +| 67 | 8/19/09
9/11/09 | Notices of Production from Non Parties: (1) Stephen Alexander, M.D.; (2) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and (3) Charles J. Galecki, M.D. | | | | +| 68 | 8/20/09 | Epstein's Objections to Notices of Production From Non-Parties and Incorporated Motion for Protective Order | | | | +| 69 | 8/24/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to (1) Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr. and (2) David Hart Rogers | | | | +| 70 | 9/24/09 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of Deposition | | | | +| 71 | 10/13/09 | Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Depositions of [REDACTED] Visoski and David Hart Rogers | | | | +| 72 | 2/9/10 | Deposition Transcript of L.M. and Video of Deposition | | | | +| 73 | | Stricken | | | | +| 74 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------|-----------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 75 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | | +| | | | | | | + +### L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-CV-81092 + +| 76 | Misc. | Court docket | +|----|---------|---------------------------------------------------| +| 77 | 7/24/09 | Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (D.E. 1) | +| 78 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 21) | +| 79 | N/D | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 | + +### E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein 15'b Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XX'OO4B + +| 80 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +|----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 81 | 9/10/08 | Complaint | | | +| 82 | 12/23/08 | Amended Complaint | | | +| 83 | 3/30/09 | Notice of Change of Firm and Address | | | +| 84 | 4/6/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint | | | +| 85 | | Stricken | | | +| 86 | 6/2/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion for Order to Terminate or Limit Deposition and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Compel for Sanctions | | | +| 87 | 7/16/09 | Cross Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez | | | +| 88 | 8/10/09 | Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | +| 89 | 8/19/09 | Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint | | | +| 90 | 8/20/09 | Order on Plaintiff's Request for Entry Upon Land | | | +| 91 | 5/6/10 | Deposition Transcript of E.W. and Video of Deposition | | | +| 92 | 5/28/10 | Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint | | | +| 93 | 7/22/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice | | | +| 94 | 7/29/10 | Order Adopting Stipulation and Dismissing Case With Prejudice | | | + +### Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein USDC S.D. FM. Case No. 08-CV-80893 + +| 95 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +|----|---------|--------------------|--|--| +| 96 | 8/12/08 | Complaint (D.E. 1) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 97 | 3/26/09 | Defendant Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 24) | | | | +| 98 | 4/9/09 | Notice of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation (D.E. 30) | | | | +| 99 | 4/9/09 | Plaintiff's Motion to Strike References to Non-Prosecution Agreement or, in the Alternative, to Lift Protective Order Barring Jane Doe's Attorney's from Revealing Provisions in the Agreement (D.E. 32) | | | | +| 100 | 4/17/09 | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (D.E. 38) | | | | +| 101 | 5/14/09 | Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases (D.E. 56) | | | | +| 102 | 7/28/09 to 10/22/09 | Notices of Taking Deposition and Subpoenas to: Ghislane Noelle Maxwell, Leslie Wexler, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, Nadia Marcinkova, Jean Luc Bruhel, [REDACTED], Michael Freidman, Rosalie Freidman, and Michael Sanka | | | | +| 103 | | Stricken | | | | +| 104 | 7/20/10 | Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 210) | | | | +| 105 | 7/20/10 | Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 211) | | | | + +***Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action)* +USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119** + +| 106 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 107 | 6/19/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 165) | | | | +| 108 | 7/23/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and to Post a \$15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (D.E. 217) | | | | +| 109 | 10/16/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice that Additional Evidence of Epstein's Fraudulent Asset Transfers Will be Filed Shortly, etc. (D.E. 357) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 110 | 10/30/09 | Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Leave to Provide Recently-Obtained Deposition Testimony and Affidavit Demonstrating Fraudulent Transfers by Epstein in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein and Incorporated Supporting Memo of Law (D.E. 386) | | | | +| 111 | 11/5/09 | Order (D.E. 400) | | | | + +# CVRA Communications + +| 112 | 8/11/06 | Letter from A. | Villafana to L.M. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------| +| 113 | 6/7/07 | Letter from A. | O S Villafana to E.W. | +| 114 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T | to E.W. | +| 115 | 1/10/08 | Letter from T. | to James Eisenberg | +| 116 | 5/30/08 | Letter from T. | to Jane Doe | +| 117 | 7/3/08 | Letter from Brad | to Ann Mari yy | +| 118 | 7/9/08 | Letter from A. | Villafana to : : : :: ards re | +| 119 | 7/9/08 | Letter from A. | Villa : : t re | +| 120 | 7/17/08 | Letter from Brad Edw: | Villafana | +| 121 | 10/9/08 | Letter from Bra Lal, a . : to Dexter Lee | | +| 122 | 10/15/08 | Letter from B • • d Ed | . s to Dexter Lee | +| 123 | 12/10/10 | Letter from B | and Paul Cassell to | +| | | Wifred | Ferrer | +| 124 | 3/1/11 | Letter fr | dley J. and Paul Cassell to | +| | | o | Ferrer | +| 125 | 3/15/11 | from Wifredo A. Ferrer to Paul Cassell | | +| 126 | 3/20/11 | a from R. Alexander Acosta to "To Whom it | | +| 127 | 3 | Letter from | J. and Paul Cassell to | +| 128 | 9n9/ 1 | Letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo Ferrer | | + +# Jane Doe v. United Slates of America (CVRA) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV + +| 129 | | Stricken | | | | | +|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--| +| 130 | 7/7/08 | Emergency Victim's Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (D.E. 1) | | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked | +|-----|---------|--------------------------------------------|-----------|--------| +| | 8/14/08 | Transcript of Hearing Before the Honorable | | | +| 132 | | Stricken | | | + +### Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein 17a Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301- E + +| 133 | Misc. | Court docket | | | +|-----|---------|-------------------|--|--| +| 134 | 11/3/09 | Amended Complaint | | | +| | | | | | + +# In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. + +# USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB + +| 135 | 11/16/09 | Motion of the U.S. Trustee for an Order Directing | | +|-----|----------|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 136 | 12/1/09 | Verified Complaint for Damages and | r e | +| 137 | 10/28/10 | Deposition Transcri t of | | +| 138 | 2/23/11 | Privilege Log of | Jaffe et | +| 139 | 12/12/11 | Transcript of Rule 20044 | on of Scott W. | +| 140 | 12/23/11 | Deposition Transc | o W. Rothstein — | +| 141 | 12/23/11 | Deposition T nscri | Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 142 | 7/2/13 | Deposit Transcript of Jack (John) Scarola | | + +# s ed St es of America v. Scott Rothstein — Forfeiture Action + +# C S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum + +| 143 | 11/9/09 dL • ed Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (D.E. 1) | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------------| +| 144 | 11/2 Nu ended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | +| 145 | 11/2 Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem | + +# The Florida Bar Matters + +| 146 | 11/9/09 | The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Jeffrey Epstein filed against ██████ J. ██████, William Berger and Scott Rothstein | | | | +|-----|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +|-----|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 147 | 11/25/09 | Approval of Scott Rothstein's disbarment; The Florida Bar v. Scott Walter Rothstein ; Supreme Court Case No. SC09-2146 | | | | +| 148 | 6/24/10 | The Florida Bar's Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice to Accused; In re Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and the Florida Bar against [REDACTED] James [REDACTED] ; Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) | | | | +| United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein
USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-60331 | | | | | | +| 149 | 12/1/09 | Information charging Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 150 | 1/25/10 | Plea Agreement between the United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein | | | | +| 151 | 9/26/17 | Government's Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Reduction of Sentence (D.E. 938) | | | | +| Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al.
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida Case No. 09-062943 | | | | | | +| 152 | Misc. | Court docket | | | | +| 153 | 11/20/09 | Complaint | | | | +| 154 | 11/25/09 | Amended Complaint | | | | +| 155 | 12/12/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 156 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 157 | 12/13/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 158 | 12/14/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 159 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 160 | 12/15/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Afternoon Session | | | | +| 161 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 162 | 12/16/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Second Session | | | | +| 163 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – Morning Session | | | | +| 164 | 12/19/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein – P.M. Session | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 165 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 166 | 12/20/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 167 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 168 | 12/21/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 169 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein — | +| 170 | 12/22/11 | Deposition Transcript of Scott W. Rothstein | + +# Communication + +| 171 | 4/8/09
2:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ Adler to Bradley J.
██████, cc Mark S. Nurik (01404) | | | | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 172 | 4/22/09
4:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. Edwards to Russell
Adler (01620) | | | | +| 173 | 4/24/09
5:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. Edwards to Russell
Adler (01446) | | | | +| 174 | 5/19/09
10:33 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to ██████ J.
██████, ██████ Adler, Steven R. Jaffe, Matthew
D. Weissing and Gary M. Farmer (01726) | | | | +| 175 | 5/19/09
12:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan K. Stirling to ██████ J.
██████ (05725) | | | | +| 176 | 5/19/09
12:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. ██████ to Russel
Adler (01574) | | | | +| 177 | | Stricken | | | | +| 178 | | Stricken | | | | +| 179 | 5/22/09
12:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Susan
Spencer Wendell (01449) | | | | +| 180 | 5/22/09
12:21 p.m. | E-██████ Spencer Wendell to
██████ J. ██████ (05148) | | | | +| 181 | 5/26/09
4:57 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to Timothy
Malloy (01450) | | | | +| 182 | 5/26/09
5:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Timothy Malloy to ██████ J.
██████ (05151) | | | | +| 183 | 5/28/09
2:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendell to
██████ J. ██████ (05161) | | | | +| 184 | 5/28/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from ██████ J. ██████ to William
J. Berger (02241-02242) | | | | +| 185 | 6/3/09
5:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from William J Berger to ██████
██████, cc ██████ Adler and ██████ J. ██████
(01735) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 186 | 6/4/09
10:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan K. Stirling, cc [REDACTED] (01410) | | | | +| 187 | 6/9/09
3:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Eric Glasser (06655) | | | | +| 188 | 6/23/09
12:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) (01632) | | | | +| 189 | 6/23/09
1:03 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (01634) | | | | +| 190 | 6/23/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05239) | | | | +| 191 | 6/23/09
1:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05203) | | | | +| 192 | 6/23/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05277-05278) | | | | +| 193 | 6/23/09
2:31 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05207-05208) | | | | +| 194 | 6/23/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (05324-05325) | | | | +| 195 | 6/23/09
2:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (05212-05213) | | | | +| 196 | 6/23/09
3:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05344-05346) | | | | +| 197 | 6/23/09
3:12 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05215-05217) | | | | +| 198 | 6/23/09
4:39 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05368-05369) | | | | +| 199 | 6/23/09
5:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05220-05221) | | | | +| 200 | 6/23/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05387-05388) | | | | +| 201 | 6/24/09
9:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05224-05225) | | | | +| 202 | 7/8/09
12:33 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Paul Cassell (07304) | | | | +| 203 | 7/8/09
3:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler, William J. Berger and Steven R. Jaffee (01462) | | | | +| 204 | 7/13/09
2:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan (Palm Beach Daily News) to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (08404) | | | | +| 205 | | Stricken | | | | +| 206 | 7/14/09
4:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to William J. Berger (02204) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 207 | 7/15/09
1:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (04906) | | | | +| 208 | 7/15/09
1:22 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04905) | | | | +| 209 | 7/18/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01661) | | | | +| 210 | | Stricken | | | | +| 211 | | Stricken | | | | +| 212 | 7/21/09
8:21 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Leone (01352) | | | | +| 213 | 7/22/09
11:22 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01479) | | | | +| 214 | 7/22/09
11:35 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05803) | | | | +| 215 | 7/22/09
1:29 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (01662) | | | | +| 216 | 7/22/09 | Letter from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] re cross noticing depositions | | | | +| 217 | 7/26/09
5:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Priscila A. Nascimento to Scott Rothstein, cc Amy N. Howard and Adelita Cabello (25860-25863) | | | | +| 218 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. Edwards to Susan Spencer Wendel (01483) | | | | +| 219 | 7/28/09
8:59 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Susan Spencer Wendel to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (03070) | | | | +| 220 | 7/28/09
9:28 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (01486) | | | | +| 221 | 7/28/09
10:00 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (05848) | | | | +| 222 | 7/29/09
1:13 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Cara L. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (08420) | | | | +| 223 | 7/28/09
1:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (11075-11076) | | | | +| 224 | 7/29/09
1:49 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05852-05853) | | | | +| 225 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05535-05536) | | | | +| 226 | 7/30/09
2:36 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (11320-11322) | | | | +| 227 | 7/30/09
6:06 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michele Dargan (05538-05539) | | | | +| 228 | 7/31/09
11:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michele Dargan to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (11080-11082) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 229 | 7/31/09
3:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (05087) | | | | +| 230 | | Stricken | | | | +| 231 | | Stricken | | | | +| 232 | 8/10/09
5:58 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (00158) | | | | +| 233 | 8/13/09
9:48 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to Priscila Nascimento (08412) | | | | +| 234 | 8/10/09
6:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06965) | | | | +| 235 | 8/10/09
7:23 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06967) | | | | +| 236 | 8/11/09
8:43 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06968-06969) | | | | +| 237 | 8/11/09
9:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (06963-06964) | | | | +| 238 | 8/11/09
10:10 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michael Isikoff (06970-06971) | | | | +| 239 | 8/11/09
12:34 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06959-06960) | | | | +| 240 | 8/14/09
4:40 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06975) | | | | +| 241 | 8/15/09
2:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Ken Jenne (01685) | | | | +| 242 | 8/15/09
6:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff (06972-06973) | | | | +| 243 | 8/17/09
10:32 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06976-06977) | | | | +| 244 | 8/17/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson (02442) | | | | +| 245 | 8/19/09
2:47 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01501) | | | | +| 246 | 8/24/09
7:38 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (01506) | | | | +| 247 | 8/24/09
7:46 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05113) | | | | +| 248 | 8/24/09
9:50 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Cara [REDACTED] and Pat [REDACTED] (05112) | | | | +| 249 | 8/25/09
11:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (05952-05953) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | | Objection Marked | +|-----|------------|-----------------------------------------|----------|------------------| +| 250 | 8/26/09 | E-mail chain - from Jacquie | to | | +| | 5:23 p.m. | (01406) | | | +| 251 | 8/26/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 9:56 p.m. | 02269 | | | +| 252 | 8/31/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 10:58 a.m. | 02895 | | | +| 253 | 9/2/09 | E-mail chain - from Elizabeth Villar to | | J. | +| | 12:54 p.m. | and Ken Jenne, cc Jacquie | | Pat | +| 254 | | Stricken | | ra l l | +| 255 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 1:39 p.m. | 07612-07613 | | | +| 256 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 6:42 p.m. | 02595-02596 | | | +| 257 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 6:49 p.m. | (07614-07615) | | | +| 258 | 9/7/09 | | | | +| | | | ;c:i | k | +| | | E-mail chain - from Conchita SamoN | | ey J. | +| | 7:00 p.m. | 07605-07606 | | | +| 259 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from J. | s to | | +| | 8:12 ..m. | 07607-07 | | | +| 260 | 9/7/09 | E-mail chain - from Conch | v off to | J. | +| | 10:55 ..m. | 07609-076 | | | +| 261 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - fro 1 | to | | +| | 11:43 a.m. | Conchita Sarno | | | +| 262 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain m chits | to | J. | +| | 11:50 a.m. | 07 | | | +| 263 | 9/8/09 | E-mail n - from J. | to | | +| | 11:53 a.m. | Conchita . i ff 07647 | | | +| 264 | 9/8/09 | it chin - from | to | J. | +| | 12:04 ..m. | s 07676-07677 | | | +| 265 | 9/8/09 | dik a chain - from | to | J. | +| | 1:59 , | IC ards (07674-07675 | | | +| 266 | 9' ' I ' | mail chain - from J. | to | | +| | 2:04 • m. | 07678-07679 | | | +| 267 | 9/8/I a | E-mail chain - from | to | J. | +| | 2:36 p.m. | 07684-07685 | | | +| 268 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - m J. | to | | +| | 2:42 p.m. | 07682-07683 | | | +| 269 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | | +| | 2:49 p.m. | 07695-07697 | | | +| 270 | 9/8/09 | E-mail chain - from | to | | +| | 3:25 p.m. | (07680-07681) | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 271 | 9/8/09
7:51 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (07686-07688) | | | | +| 272 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07689-07691) | | | | +| 273 | 9/8/09
7:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (07692-07694) | | | | +| 274 | 9/15/09
1:08 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Elizabeth Villar, cc Ken Jenne and Pat [REDACTED] (01361) | | | | +| 275 | | Stricken | | | | +| 276 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Adler (01318) | | | | +| 277 | 9/18/09
12:35 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to Ann [REDACTED] Villafana, cc [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01583) | | | | +| 278 | 9/18/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Susan Spencer Wendel (05619-05620) | | | | +| 279 | 9/18/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Beth S. Williamson (01144) | | | | +| 280 | 9/18/09
2:55 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. Edwards to Michele Dargan (01280-01288) | | | | +| 281 | 9/21/09
1:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita Sarnoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03081) | | | | +| 282 | | Stricken | | | | +| 283 | 9/23/09
8:42 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Conchita [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (04320) | | | | +| 284 | 9/24/09
6:31 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Bradley J. [REDACTED] to Conchita Sarnoff (04321) | | | | +| 285 | 9/24/09
6:53 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (04318-04319) | | | | +| 286 | 9/24/09
8:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards (10586-10589) | | | | +| 287 | 9/28/09
8:09 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. Edwards, cc Renee/Carlos (02913) | | | | +| 288 | 9/28/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (06789) | | | | +| 289 | 9/28/09
10:20 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06788) | | | | +| 290 | 9/28/09
11:45 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Conchita [REDACTED] (19986-19987) | | | | +| 291 | 9/29/09
10:06 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenn and Elizabeth Villar (01754) | | | | +| 292 | | Stricken | | | | +| 293 | | Stricken | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 294 | 10/2/09
10:41 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Nigel Rosser (06191) | | | | +| 295 | 10/2/09
11:08 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Nigel Rosser to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06189-06190) | | | | +| 296 | 10/2/09
4:28 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (06979-06980) | | | | +| 297 | 10/2/09
4:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten (02440-02441) | | | | +| 298 | 10/2/09
4:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Michael Isikoff, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06974) | | | | +| 299 | 10/2/09
6:14 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Michael Isikoff to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (06955-06956) | | | | +| 300 | 10/6/09
11:14 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala | | | | +| 301 | 10/8/09
4:11 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Richard [REDACTED] (06961) | | | | +| 302 | 10/13/09
2:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Grant J. [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Ken Jenne, Kip Hunter and [REDACTED] Adler, cc Grant J. [REDACTED] (26507) | | | | +| 303 | 10/13/09
2:27 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Mike Fisten to Bradley J. [REDACTED] (01727) | | | | +| 304 | 10/13/09
2:23 p.m. | E-mail chain – from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Kretschmar and D. Von Allmen (23299-23300) | | | | +| 305 | 10/13/09
2:37 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26827) | | | | +| 306 | 10/13/09
4:02 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala (26094-26096) | | | | +| 307 | 10/13/09
5:38 p.m. | E-mail chain – from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein (27277-27278) | | | | +| 308 | 10/13/09
7:00 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie Johnson, cc Mike Fisten (01744) | | | | +| 309 | 10/14/09
7:39 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] (03190) | | | | +| 310 | 10/14/09
9:02 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (03189) | | | | +| 311 | 10/14/09
10:42 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01099) | | | | +| 312 | 10/14/09
12:20 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Mike Fisten, cc Jacquie [REDACTED] (01741) | | | | +| 313 | 10/15/09
8:59 p.m. | E-mail chain - from A.J. Discala to Scott Rothstein, D. Von Allmen (26882) | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 314 | 10/16/09
5:29 a.m. | E-mail chain - from ABA Journal Weekly Newsletter to Scott Rothstein (25864-25865) | | | | +| 315 | | Stricken | | | | +| 316 | 10/19/09
10:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Ken Jenne (01704) | | | | +| 317 | 10/20/09
12:41 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to [REDACTED] Preve (27303) | | | | +| 318 | 10/20/09
1:01 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Rush to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01433) | | | | +| 319 | 10/20/09
3:07 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26506) | | | | +| 320 | 10/22/09
11:17 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala, [REDACTED] Podaras and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (26817-26818) | | | | +| 321 | 10/22/09
11:52 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] to Jacquie [REDACTED] (01391) | | | | +| 322 | 10/22/09
1:48 p.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Edwards to Jacquie [REDACTED] (04996) | | | | +| 323 | 10/22/09
2:52 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie Johnson to [REDACTED] Adler, Cara L. [REDACTED], Mike Fisten, Michael J. Wheeler, Marc S. Nurik, William J. Berger, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Barry J. Stone and Ken Jenne, cc Robert C. Buschel (01392) | | | | +| 324 | 10/22/09
4:10 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Marc S. Nurik, Michael J. Wheeler, Cara L. [REDACTED], William J. Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Robert C. Buschel (01307) | | | | +| 325 | 10/23/09
11:40 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Ken Jenne to Scott Rothstein (26477) | | | | +| 326 | 10/23/09
12:17 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Jacquie [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] Edwards, William Berger and Robert Buschel (02992) | | | | +| 327 | 10/23/09
12:53 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Scott Rothstein to A.J. Discala and [REDACTED] Kretschmar (026335) | | | | +| 328 | 10/26/09
7:46 a.m. | E-mail chain - from William J. Berger to Pat Carter and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], cc [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and Jacquie [REDACTED] (01380) | | | | +| 329 | 10/29/09
2:16 p.m. | E-mail chain - from Pat [REDACTED] to [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01623) | | | | +| 330 | 10/30/09
10:01 a.m. | E-mail chain - from Debra [REDACTED] to Scott Rothstein (26304-26305) | | | | +| 331 | 10/30/09
10:03 a.m. | E-mail chain - from [REDACTED] Adler to Jacquie [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] (01625) | | | | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------------------------------| +| 332 | Stricken | +| 333 | Stricken | +| 334 | Stricken | +| 335 | Stricken | +| 336 | Stricken | +| 337 | Stricken | + +### Billing + +| 338 | 12/21/09 | Contract for Services between Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley and ██████ J. ██████ (BJE000000001-BJE0000000005) | | | | +|-----|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--| +| 339 | N/D | Spreadsheet of Brad ██████ Time in ██████ adv. Epstein (BJE00000104 – BJE00000156) | | | | +| 340 | 7/14/10 - 1/16/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Invoices for Disbursements to ██████ J. Edwards (BJE000000039 – BJE000000103) | | | | +| 341 | 1/1/80 – 2/15/13 | Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley's Matter Ledger Report (BJE000000006 – BJE000000038) | | | | + +# sc eous + +| 342 | 10/23/09 | Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler's Firm Directory | | | +|-----|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--| +| 343 | 12/1/09 | Criminal Complaint, United States of America v. Alfredo Rodriguez ; USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-8308 | | | +| 344 | 4/23/10 | Affidavit of Bradley James | | | +| 345 | 9/21/10 | Affidavit of [REDACTED] James | | | +| 346 | 11/16/17 | Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP's website printout for Robert D. Critton Jr.
( https://www.lawclc.com/team_members/Robert-d-critton-jr/ ) | | | +| 347 | 11/16/17 | Fowler [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A.'s website printout for [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. ([REDACTED] - [REDACTED]) | | | + +# J. — Presentations Reco nition Bios + +| 348 | N/D | The National Crime Victim Bar Association | +|-----|-----|---------------------------------------------------| +| | | resentation excerpt of article by J. | +| 349 | N/D | The Florida Bar's website member profile printout | +| | | for James | + +| No. Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 350 N/D National Association of Distinguished Counsel | | +| biographical information for | J. | +| 351 5/14/13 The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 | | +| directory/?last name! | &state-FL&x=18 | +| 352 5/14/13 The National Trial Lawyers Profile View of Brad | Ai | +| (http:// | naltriallawyers.org/profile | +| viewBra | 4409 | +| 353 5/14/13 Law is.com website information for | J. | +| n | 3489098-a0 | +| 354 11/8/17 The American Registry Website rintou | | +| recognitions | received by J. | +| 355 10/30/04 Kubicki Dra er's website attorney | for | +| 356 10/30/05 Kubicki Dra er's website alto | i ation for | +| 357 11/9/17 Jaffe, We' | Fistos & | +| Lehrman, P.L.' | orneys" website printout | +| (https://www. • | ce.com/about | +| 358 5/7/12 | Weissing, Fistos & | +| Le | .L. s website printout | +| 359 1/16/13 r, Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| 360 1/16/ 3 M, Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | +| 361 5/14/13 =, Jaffe, Weissing, | Fistos & | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 362 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.abuseandassault.com/Abuse_Under_Notable Cases ) | | | | +| 363 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] ( www.pathtojustice.com/attorneys/brad-#.UZJOPpWTOX0 ) | | | | +| 364 | 5/14/13 | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website printout ( http://www.pathtojustice.com/media-center/achived-press-releases/#.UZJTy5WTOX0 ) | | | | +| 365 | | [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s website attorney information for Brad [REDACTED] with referenced articles | | | | +| A. | Winter 2014 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 104; Issue 1. Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges are Filed ; | | | | +| B. | 12/26/15 | Politico. Victims in Underage Sex Case Want Prosecutors to Testify | | | | +| C. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal: Alan Dershowitz Suffers Setback in Defamation Case | | | | +| D. | 12/18/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Victims' Attorneys Seek Partial Victory in Defamation Suit | | | | +| E. | 12/21/15 | Palm Beach Post. Boca-Resident Model Nabs \$13.4 Million Following Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| F. | 12/17/15 | Daily Mail.Com. Florida Model Gets Whopping \$13.4 Million Payout from Real Estate Tycoon Ex-Husband After Nasty Six-Year Divorce Battle | | | | +| G. | 11/25/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appellate Court Reverses Palm Beach Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein's Victory | | | | +| H. | 11/12/15 | Daily Business Review. Attorney's Suit Against Billionaire Allowed as Long as Justices Say It's OK | | | | +| I. | 7/8/15 | Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Keeps Thousands of Epstein Documents Sealed | | | | +| J. | 6/25/15 | WCVB5. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Mass. Widower in Fatal Cabana Crash | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------|---------------------------------------------------| +| K. | 6/24/15 | NBC6. Jury Awards 24 Million in Fatal Cabana | +| L. | 6/24/15 | CBS Miami. Jury Awards Millions to Husband of | +| M. | 6/25/15 | Sun Sentinel. Jury Awards \$24 Million to Widower | +| N. | 1/8/15 | Daily Business Review. The Lawyer Suing Legal | +| O. | 4/21/14 | The Washington Post. Eleventh Circuit Rules that | +| P. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Daily News. Appeals Court Rules | +| Q. | 4/21/14 | Sun-Sentinel. Victims Win Right to See | +| R. | 4/21/14 | Palm Beach Post. Appellate Rut ul once | +| | | Feds to Reconsider Sex Chan t Palm | +| S. | 10/20/13 | Palm Beach Daily Ne ew Lawsuit Against | +| | | Epstein Expected to tim Testimony | +| T. | 9/10/12 | CBS Miami Excl iv al Assault Victim | +| | | Alleges Abuse Youth Pastor | +| U. | 9/7/12 | Sun-Sentinel. leva Fall Nets Woman \$13 | +| | | Million Jrr A) | +| V. | July 2012 | Daily B Review. Top Florida Verdicts & | +| | | Set emen o 2011 | +| W. | 6/13/12 | Bus ess Review. Suit Accuses Goldrush | +| | | i ub of Scheme to Bilk Professionals | +| X. | 4/22/ 1 | m Beach Daily Business Review. Jeffrey | +| 366 | 8/10 | Jaffe Weissing's Facebook page with | +| A. | 5/22/16 | Lawnewz.com. The Shameful Way Feds Protected | +| B. | 5/13/16 | Fox News. Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on | +| C. | 2/11/16 | Sun-Sentinel. Feds Deceived Us About Billionaire | +| | | Sex Offender's 'Sweetheart Deal' Teen Victims Say | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|------------------------------------------------------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| D. | 2/12/16 | NBC News. Lawyers: Victims Not Told of 'Sweetheart Deal' for Jeffrey Epstein | | | | +| E. | 2/11/16 | NY Daily News. Jeffrey Epstein Accusers Sue Feds Over Hidden Non-Prosecution 'Conspiracy' | | | | +| F. | 4/23/14 | [REDACTED], Jaffe. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E. Epstein Case | | | | +| G. | 4/23/14 | Daily Business Review. Prosecutors Must Turn Over Docs in Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case | | | | +| [REDACTED] Pottinger's Website & Verdicts | | | | | | +| 367 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Brad | | | | +| 368 | 1/29/18 | [REDACTED] Pottinger Website Printout – Recent Jury Verdicts | | | | +| [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Lawsuits | | | | | | +| 369 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Court, Case No. 16-1995-MM-000074-AXXX-MA | | | | +| 370 | Misc. | Court and arrest information; Bradley James
[REDACTED]; Duval County Case No. 16-1998-CF-004394-AXXX-MA | | | | +| 371 | 8/14/07 | Exemption and/or Limitation Exclusion – Tax Assessment of \$3,507.72 | | | | +| 372 | 1/7/08 | Notice of Satisfaction of Lien Relative to Tax Exemption | | | | +| 373 | Misc. | Docket; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED]
J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 374 | 1/21/10 | Petition/Complaint; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 375 | 2/18/10 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Answer and Affirmative Defenses; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 376 | 8/11/10 | Notice of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 377 | 8/11/10 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; U.S. Bank National Association v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 378 | 10/22/10 | Certificate of Sale; U.S. Bank National Association v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 379 | 11/2/10 | Certificate of Title; U.S. Bank National Association v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA002613AXXXCE | | | | +| 380 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 381 | 3/17/10 | Petition/Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 382 | 10/4/11 | Final Summary Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bradley J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 383 | 10/10/11 | Notice of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 384 | 1/5/12 | Certificate of Sale; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 385 | 1/18/12 | Certificate of Title; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. Edwards ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2010CA012467AXXXCE | | | | +| 386 | Misc. | Docket; Ist United Bank v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 387 | 12/8/11 | Complaint; Ist United Bank v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 388 | 1/25/12 | Stipulation for Settlement; Ist United Bank v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 11-030427 | | | | +| 389 | Misc. | Docket; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. J. J. ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 390 | 3/22/12 | Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 391 | 5/18/12 | [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 392 | 10/3/12 | Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 393 | 10/26/12 | Answer to Complaint; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 394 | 11/20/12 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 395 | 3/15/13 | Mediation Report; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [REDACTED] ; 17 th Judicial Circuit, Broward County Case No. 2012CC003827AXXXWE | | | | +| 396 | | Corporate Detail Printout from Sunbiz.org for The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 397 | 4/16/07 | Articles of Organization for Florida Limited Liability Company for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC | | | | +| 398 | 1/25/08 | 2008 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 399 | 3/11/09 | 2009 Limited Liability Company Annual Report for The Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] and Associates | | | | +| 400 | | Florida Bar Rule 4-7.21 | | | | +| 401 | 3/3/08 | Complaint; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 1) | | | | +| 402 | 6/17/08 | Omnibus Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Donald D. Baker v. The City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-60294-CIV-HUCK (D.E. 79) | | | | +| 403 | 8/10/10 | U.S. Court of Appeals Opinion; Donald D. Baker v. City of Hollywood, et al. ; Case No. 08-14924 & 08-15602 | | | | +| 404 | 12/9/04 | New Times Broward Palm-Beach: Tale of the Tape | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| Experts | | | | | | +| 405 | 10/20/17 | Dr. Bernard J. Jansen's Expert Report with attachments | | | | +| 406 | Misc. | All documents produced, or relied upon or referenced by Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in preparing his 10/20/17 Report | | | | +| 407 | 9/9/16 | Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| 408 | 11/30/16 | Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Dr. Bernard J. Jansen in [REDACTED] v. Ghislaine Maxwell (USDC NY) | | | | +| Other Articles | | | | | | +| 409 | 11/1/09 | Kendall Coffey: Law Firm Victimized by Scott Rothstein | | | | +| 410 | 11/2/09 | Legal Junkies. WSJ Law Blog – Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Ft. Lauderdale, Law Firm Dissolution, Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 411 | 11/2/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Chief Judge: Scott Rothstein's Firm Has "No Money" and is Going into Receivership | | | | +| 412 | 11/3/09 | The New York Times: Fraud Accusations Against Florida Lawyer Set Off a Race to Return His Donations | | | | +| 413 | 11/3/09 | Rothstein Returns After Contemplating Suicide, Partner Says | | | | +| 414 | 11/3/09 | Florida Law Firm Asks to be Dissolved | | | | +| 415 | 11/3/09 | Sun Sentinel. Scott Rothstein's Investment Deals Seemed Too Good to be True | | | | +| 416 | 11/5/09 | Funds News. FBI Agents Search Law Firm in Missing Funds Probe | | | | +| 417 | 11/6/09 | New Times Broward-Palm Beach. Scott Rothstein: The Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton Ploy | | | | +| 418 | 11/6/09 | Rothstein Accomplice Still on Lam | | | | +| 419 | 11/7/09 | Tour of Scott Rothstein's Office Reveals Gallery of Who's Who | | | | +| 420 | 11/12/09 | Sun Sentinel: FBI Doubts Rothstein Ran a Ponzi Scheme Alone | | | | +| 421 | 11/13/09 | Palm Beach Post: FBI Doubts Rothstein's Scheme a 'One-Man Show' | | | | +| 422 | 11/13/09 | Sun Sentinel. High-Ranking Police Officers Guarded Over Rothstein | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|---------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 423 | 11/17/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part I | | | | +| 424 | 11/17/09 | Sun Sentinel. Rothstein Asks to Voluntarily Give Up Law License | | | | +| 425 | 11/17/09 | Rothstein and Dreier: How Much Alike? | | | | +| 426 | 11/18/09 | Inside the Rothstein Swindle, Part III | | | | +| 427 | 11/18/09 | Former RRA Attorneys Take New Jobs | | | | +| 428 | 11/20/09 | Scherer Files Suit Against Rothstein, et al. | | | | +| 429 | 11/20/09 | Article by Paul Brinkman | | | | +| 430 | 11/21/09 | Rothstein Feeder [REDACTED] Levin's Ugly Past | | | | +| 431 | 11/22/09 | [REDACTED] Levin was Rothstein's Whale | | | | +| 432 | 11/23/09 | Rothstein Associate Levy Got Protection from Plantation Cops | | | | +| 433 | 11/23/09 | Main Line Firm's Clients Invested \$30 Million with 'Ponzi' Lawyer | | | | +| 434 | 11/23/09 | Sun-Sentinel. Scott Rothstein: "You're in Town Full of Thieves | | | | +| 435 | 11/24/09 | Miami Herald. Feds: Scott Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Paid Salaries at Law Firm | | | | +| 436 | 11/26/09 | The Rothstein Wires | | | | +| 437 | 1/13/10 | Sun Sentinel. Florida Bar Looking at 35 Former Attorneys from Rothstein's Firm | | | | +| 438 | July 2010 | Sun Sentinel. 22 Former Scott Rothstein Attorneys Cleared by the Florida Bar | | | | +| 439 | 10/22/10 | South Florida Business Journal. A Year After Rothstein, [REDACTED] by Questions Unanswered | | | | +| 440 | 10/31/10 | The Florida Bar. Scott Rothstein Scandal: One Year Later | | | | +| 441 | 11/1/10 | The Florida Bar Daily News Summary | | | | +| 442 | 1/21/13 | Forbes. Rothstein Expose Details Sex, Murder, and Corruption Behind Florida's Largest Ponzi Scheme | | | | +| 443 | 10/13/14 | Five Years on, Rothstein's Ponzi Still Resonates | | | | +| 444 | 10/3/17 | Palm Beach Daily News. Epstein Paid Three Women \$5.5 Million to End Underage Sex Lawsuits | | | | +| L.M. and E.W. – Public Records | | | | | | +| 445 | | Stricken | | | | +| 446 | | Stricken | | | | +| L.M. – Public Records | | | | | | +| 447 | | Stricken | | | | +| 448 | | Stricken | | | | + +| No. | Date | Description | Objection | Marked in Evidence | Marked for Id. | +|-----|------|-------------|-----------|--------------------|----------------| +| 449 | | Stricken | | | | +| 450 | | Stricken | | | | +| 451 | | Stricken | | | | +| 452 | | Stricken | | | | +| 453 | | Stricken | | | | +| 454 | | Stricken | | | | +| 455 | | Stricken | | | | +| 456 | | Stricken | | | | +| 457 | | Stricken | | | | +| 458 | | Stricken | | | | +| 459 | | Stricken | | | | +| 460 | | Stricken | | | | +| 461 | | Stricken | | | | +| 462 | | Stricken | | | | +| 463 | | Stricken | | | | +| 464 | | Stricken | | | | +| 465 | | Stricken | | | | +| 466 | | Stricken | | | | + +**E.W. – Public Records** + +| 467 | | Stricken | | | | +|-----|--|----------|--|--|--| +| 468 | | Stricken | | | | +| 469 | | Stricken | | | | +| 470 | | Stricken | | | | +| 471 | | Stricken | | | | +| 472 | | Stricken | | | | +| 473 | | Stricken | | | | +| 474 | | Stricken | | | | +| 475 | | Stricken | | | | +| 476 | | Stricken | | | | +| 477 | | Stricken | | | | +| 478 | | Stricken | | | | +| 479 | | Stricken | | | | +| 480 | | Stricken | | | | +| 481 | | Stricken | | | | +| 482 | | Stricken | | | | +| 483 | | Stricken | | | | +| 484 | | Stricken | | | | +| 485 | | Stricken | | | | + +| No | Date Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------------------------------| +| | for Id | +| 486 | Stricken | +| 487 | Stricken | +| 488 | Stricken | +| 489 | Stricken | +| 490 | Stricken | +| 491 | Stricken | +| 492 | Stricken | +| 493 | Stricken | +| 494 | Stricken 40 Ab A' | +| 495 | Stricken | +| 496 | Stricken | +| 497 | Stricken | +| 498 | Stricken CE) | +| 499 | Stricken | +| 500 | Stricken | +| 501 | Stricken | +| 502 | ( < 4) 9 Stricken A 1 4 / | + +### Jane Doe - Public Records + +| 503 | Stricken | +|-----|---------------------| +| | ?\ ‘ ' | +| 504 | Stricken | +| 505 | Stricken | +| 506 | Stricken Stricken , | +| 507 | Stricken | +| 508 | Stricken | +| 509 | Stricken | +| 510 | Stricken | +| 511 | S ' ken | +| 512 | ' ken | +| 514 | S 'cken | +| 515 | + Stricken | +| 516 | Stricken | +| 517 | Stricken | +| 518 | Stricken | +| 519 | Stricken | +| 520 | Stricken | +| 521 | Stricken | +| 522 | Stricken | +| 523 | Stricken | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|-----|-----------------------------------| +| 524 | Stricken | +| 525 | Stricken | +| 526 | Stricken | +| 527 | Stricken | +| 528 | Stricken | +| 529 | Stricken | +| 530 | Stricken | + +# - Public Records + +| 531 | Stricken | +|-----|--------------| +| 532 | Stricken gli | +| 533 | Stricken | +| 534 | Stricken | +| 535 | Stricken | +| 536 | Stricken | +| 537 | Stricken | +| 538 | Stricken | +| 539 | Stricken | +| 540 | Stricken | + +# J. nn ul Cassell v. Dershowitz 17th Judicial Circui oun Case No. CACE-1500072 + +| 541 | Stricken | +|-----|----------| +| 542 | Stricken | +| 543 | Stricken | + +# General + +| 544 | ublic rids and news articles relating to | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------| +| | co thstein Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, | +| | dley J. or any witnesses listed by | +| 545 | All court dockets, hearing transcripts, discovery | +| 546 | All documents produced by any party or non-party | +| 547 | All prior testimony, statements, reports and | + +| No. | Date Description Objection Marked | +|-----|----------------------------------------------------| +| 548 | All charts/analyses prepared based on documents | +| 549 | All foundation exhibits | +| 550 | All rebuttal and impeachment exhibits | +| 551 | Demonstrative aids and exhibits including, but not | +| 552 | All newt discovered documents/exhibits | +| 553 | Any and all exhibits listed by J. | +| | ( 14/ ° | + +# ERTIFI ATE F ER + +I certify that the foregoing document has Service List below on November 13, 2018, throw Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bXl). to the attorneys listed on the s e-filing portal pursuant to Florida + +> ROCICENBACH, PA es pay155 alm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 rest Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +> > By: Is/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara®Iinkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████

| +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ██████ J. ██████
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
██████ J. ██████ |

Marc S. Nurik
Law Office of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Brooklyn Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9b4582cbe969b067ef887b7c52b355c366330e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710/EFTA02768710.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1526 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768710.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 31, + "chars": 134343, + "elapsed_seconds": 22.36, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE \n(Modified in accordance with the Cou \nAc O) I K'S EXHIBIT LIST \ner 2, 2018, rulings)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 506.66131591796875, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 506.66131591796875, + 356.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 356.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 371.48400000000004, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 463.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-CV-81092", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 412.1792907714844, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 412.1792907714844, + 171.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 171.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein \n15'b Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058XX'OO4B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.776, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 468.23175048828125, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 468.23175048828125, + 270.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 151.776, + 270.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUSDC S.D. FM. Case No. 08-CV-80893", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.856, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 413.1012878417969, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 413.1012878417969, + 638.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 206.856, + 638.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Consolidated Action) USDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-CV-80119", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 448.74 + ], + [ + 439.41599999999994, + 448.74 + ], + [ + 439.41599999999994, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 477.09000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CVRA Communications", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 376.11224365234375, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 376.11224365234375, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 255.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe v. United Slates of America (CVRA) \nUSDC S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CIV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 427.4522399902344, + 619.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 427.4522399902344, + 652.0500000000001 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 652.0500000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and Stuart Rosenfeldt v. Scott W. Rothstein \n17a Judicial Circuit Broward County Case No. 2009-CA-059301- E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 505.8880310058594, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 505.8880310058594, + 199.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 199.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 407.4343566894531, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 407.4343566894531, + 256.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 256.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "USBC S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-34791-RB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 414.324, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 414.324, + 270.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 270.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "s ed St es of America v. Scott Rothstein \u2014 Forfeiture Action", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 468.9909973144531, + 507.87 + ], + [ + 468.9909973144531, + 523.9924926757812 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 523.9924926757812 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C S.D. Ha. Case No. 09-CV-61780-Zloch-Rosenbaum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 461.162109375, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 461.162109375, + 537.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 158.50799999999998, + 537.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Florida Bar Matters", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.412, + 621.27 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 621.27 + ], + [ + 375.3721008300781, + 636.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 245.412, + 636.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Communication", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.608, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 354.72344970703125, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 354.72344970703125, + 298.2324523925781 + ], + [ + 265.608, + 298.2324523925781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Billing", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.08799999999997, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 330.8738708496094, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 330.8738708496094, + 228.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 290.08799999999997, + 228.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "sc eous", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.504, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 349.8275451660156, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 349.8275451660156, + 411.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 270.504, + 411.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "J. \u2014 Presentations Reco nition Bios", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 455.1138610839844, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 455.1138610839844, + 622.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 622.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E.W. \u2013 Public Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 369.64799999999997, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 423.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jane Doe - Public Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.904, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 381.3648681640625, + 370.98 + ], + [ + 381.3648681640625, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 239.904, + 384.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "- Public Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.096, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 400.91357421875, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 400.91357421875, + 243.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 219.096, + 243.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "J. nn ul Cassell v. Dershowitz \n17th Judicial Circui oun Case No. CACE-1500072", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 476.67498779296875, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 476.67498779296875, + 428.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 428.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 334.30340576171875, + 496.53 + ], + [ + 334.30340576171875, + 512.3624877929688 + ], + [ + 286.41600000000005, + 512.3624877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFI ATE F ER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 325.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 325.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 85.05 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Table", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 159 + ], + [ + "Line", + 79 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 129 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 164 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Table", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768710" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78cb9c2ea5d837aee3d01863bf162e8d20bc3133 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.md @@ -0,0 +1,877 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A + +Cos + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF IN'S NOTICE OF NEW REOUESTED JURY INST S AND VERDICT FORM BASED ON SEPARATE TRIAL OF COUNTERCLAIM + +Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.470, files this Notice of Ne Jury Instructions and Verdict Form. + +| No. 1 2 3 4 | Cite 101.1 201.1 201.2 | ry Instruction Accepted (Y/N1 Oath ofJ rs B ore Voir Dire Qua ificatio Des v • tro ction of Partici nts and Their Roles | +|-------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5 | 201. | xplanation of the Voir Dire Process | +| 6 | 10 . | L of Juror After Voir Dire | +| 7 | 202.2 | Explanation of the Trial Procedure | +| 8 | 20 . | Note-Taking by Jurors | +| 9 '-` \ | 202.4 | Juror Questions | +| 10 | 301.1 | Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated | +| 11 | 301.2 | Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, | +| 12 | 301.3 | Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors | +| 13 | 301.4 | Instructions Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids | +| 14 | 301.5 | Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose | +| 15 | 301.10 | Instructions Before Recess | + +| No. | Cite | Jury Instruction | Accepted (Y/N) | +|-----|---------|------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| 16 | 406.1 | Introduction | | +| 17 | 406.2 | Summary of Claims | | +| 18 | 406.3 | Greater Weight of the Evidence | | +| 19 | 406.8 | Issues on Claim | | +| 20 | 406.4 | Probable Cause | | +| 21 | 406.5 | Malice | | +| 22 | 406.6 | Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding | | +| 23 | 406.7 | Legal Cause | | +| 24 | 406.8 | Bona Fide Termination | | +| 25 | 406.9 | Burden of Proof on Claim | | +| 26 | 406.12 | Malicious Prosecution Damages | | +| 27 | 601.1 | Weighing the Evidence | | +| 28 | 601.2 | Believability of Witnesses | | +| 29 | 601.5 | Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument) | | +| 30 | 700 | Closing Instructions | | +| 31 | 503.2 | Punitive Damages (Bifurcated Issue) | | +| 32 | 301.11a | Adverse Inference – Fifth Amendment | | + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 13, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA + 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 + West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) + Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com + +*Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein* + +**SERVICE LIST** + +|

Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED]

|

Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED]

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J.
[REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| +| |

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +# 101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will answer truthfully all questions asked of you as prospective jurors [so help you God]? + +Source + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +cos + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 Qualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire + +Many of you have electronic devices such as cell phones, smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Even though you have not yet been selected as a juror, there are some strict rules that you must follow about electronic devices. + +When you are called to a courtroom, the judge will give you specific instructions on the use of electronic devices. These rules are so important that the judge may tell you t you must turn off your cell phone or other electronic devices completely or that you canno your cell phone or electronic devices in the courtroom. If someone needs to contact of an emergency, the judge will provide you with a phone number where you can a messages. + +If the trial judge allows you to keep your cell phones, co other electronic devices, you cannot use them to take photographs, video recordin dio recordings of the proceedings in the courtroom or your fellow jurors. You must n use to search the Internet or to find out anything related to any cases in the courthouse + +Why is this restriction imposed? This restricti the case without distraction and only on the evidence, some of you, these restrictions affect your normal way you are used to communicating and perha because jurors must decide in the courtroom. I know that, for ies and may require a change in the the way you are used to learning. + +If you investigate, research, or m make sure that the information you o opportunity to dispute or challenge by a juror unfairly and imprope system promises. es on your own, the trial judge has no way to oper for the case. The parties likewise have no cy of what you find. Any independent investigation s the parties from having that opportunity our judicial + +Between now an not discuss any informati and family mem You called for jury a jury and ho the case anythi phone or n ou have been discharged from jury duty by the judge, you must a ut your jury service with anyone, including friends, co-workers, ay tell those who need to know where you are that you have been u are picked for a jury, you may tell people that you have been picked for case may take. However, you must not give anyone any information about e people involved in the case. You must also warn people not to try to say or write to you about your jury service or the case. This includes face-to-face, puler communications. + +I want to stress that you must not use electronic devices or computers to talk about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages, including e-mail and text messages, about your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about your jury service or ask for advice on how to decide any case. + +The judge will tell you when you are released from this instruction. Remember, these rules are designed to guarantee a fair trial. It is important that you understand the rules as well as the impact on our system of justice if you fail to follow them. If it is determined that any one of you has violated this rule, and conducted any type of independent research or investigation, it may result in a mistrial. A mistrial would require the case to be tried again at great expense to the parties and the judicial system. The judge may also impose a penalty upon any juror who violates this instruction. All of us are depending on you to follow these rules, so that there will be a fair and lawful resolution of every case. + +source: + +Florida StAgdard Jury Instruction (Civil) (not numbered) + +**COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 3** +**201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire** + +Welcome. [I] [The clerk] will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. + +This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a disagreement between people or companies, where the claims of one or more of these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +*This case pertains to whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to initiate in 2009 and continue until 2012 a civil proceeding against [REDACTED] alleging that Edwards knew or should have known about Scott Rothstein running a Ponzi scheme through his law firm of which [REDACTED] was a partner. Epstein originally sued both Scott Rothstein and Bradley [REDACTED] in one original civil proceeding. Epstein's lawsuit against Scott Rothstein has been separated from this action and exists as a separate proceeding.* + +[REDACTED] is an attorney. In August and September 2008, while he was a sole practitioner, [REDACTED] filed three separate lawsuits on behalf of three tort claimants against Epstein for alleged sexual misconduct. + +In late March 2009, [REDACTED] joined the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"). At the time he joined RRA, Edwards held the title of "partner" and he turned over to Scott Rothstein the three clients who had brought claims against Epstein. RRA continued to pursue these clients' claims until the firm imploded in November 2009. [REDACTED] representation of the three tort claimants continued after the implosion of RRA. + +It was publicly disclosed in early November 2009 that Rothstein, the senior partner of RRA, had conducted a fraudulent Ponzi scheme which, in part, had used the fact that sexual abuse claims against Epstein were being prosecuted by RRA to induce investors to buy interests in fictitious, non-existent settlements of sexual abuse claims against Epstein. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millions of dollars and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. + +In early December 2009, Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a lawsuit against [REDACTED], Rothstein and one of [REDACTED] clients. Epstein alleged that while [REDACTED] was a partner at RRA in 2009, the cases [REDACTED] brought against Epstein when [REDACTED] was a sole practitioner in 2008, were being used in 2009 to pursue issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims pled in those cases, and instead were done to benefit and lure investors into Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. + +[REDACTED] countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. The lawsuit for your determination is [REDACTED] counterclaim. [REDACTED] contends that Epstein filed the lawsuit for the sole purpose of attempting to intimidate him into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims. Epstein eventually settled the cases with [REDACTED] three clients. + +*Epstein voluntarily withdrew his claims against [REDACTED] client in August 2010. Epstein dismissed his claims against [REDACTED] in August 2012 without prejudice to his right to reassert them at a later time. The only claim pending and for your determination is [REDACTED] claim against Epstein for malicious prosecution.* + +The principal witnesses who may testify in this case are *Jeffrey Epstein (via video deposition)*, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], *Scott Rothstein (via deposition)*, and *Mr. [REDACTED] clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe).* + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.1 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles + +Who are the people here and what do they do? + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as "The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and decide how to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that you will need to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on the issues of this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plaintiff. A party that lied the Defendant. A party who has been sued (the Defendant) can counter sue the s ho brought the lawsuit (the Plaintiff). In this instance, the Defendant is also referred t' nter-Plaintiff and the Plaintiff is also referred to at the Counter-Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of representing the' cli for their client here at the trial. They have taken oaths as att the rules for their profession. at means they speak do their best and to follow + +Plaintiff7Counter-Defendant's Counsel: The Link, represents Jeffrey Epstein, who is the pets courthouse. His job is to present his client's sid tc , to most of the time as "the Counter-Deftnda ' Mr at the table with you? S this this side of the courtroom, Scott ed the initial proceeding here at the to you. He and his client will be referred irk, will you please introduce who is sitting + +Defendant/Counter-Plainti Scarola, represents a counterclaim against Mr. Eps his client will usually be referr introduce who is sitting a I: The attorney on this side of the courtroom, Jack f the defendants who has been sued and who brought iJob is to present his client's side of things to you. He and ere as "the Counter-Plaintiff:" Mr. Scarola, will you please table with you? + +Court Cle to assist me wit of the exhibi on sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. [He] [She] is here the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection introduced in the course of the trial. + +eporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. ] [Her] job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is the bailiff. [His] [Her] job is to maintain order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. Anything you need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should be brought to [him] [her]. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the case. Only I can do that. + +Jury: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begin to select in a few moments from among all of you. The jury's job will be to decide what the facts are and what the facts mean. + +Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point and have no fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial, there are rules that all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyone, including friends and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or your jury service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on how to decide this case. + +I want to stress that this rule means you must not use electronic devices or computers to communicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting information on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, [maps], or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom.\*\* + +*\*\*The trial judge should select one of the following two alternative instructions explaining the rules governing jurors' use of electronic devices, as explained in Note on Use 1.* + +*Alternative A:* [All cell phones, computers, tablets or other types of electronic devices must be turned off while you are in the courtroom. Turned off means that the phone or other electronic device is actually off and not in a silent or vibrating mode. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or of your fellow jurors. After each recess, please double check to make sure your cell phone or electronic device is turned off. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. You cannot have in the jury room any cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +*Alternative B:* [You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number will be provided to you.] + +What are the reasons for these rules? These rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and only on the evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make inquiries on your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that the information you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportunity to dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary to our judicial system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and challenge the evidence being considered against it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. Any independent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start ov tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the tax these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, suc paying a fine or both. trigs, and 'al is a If you violate g time in jail, + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, o these proceedings. That means those communications shall e. court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing instructed the courtroom personnel that any communi presence must be reported to me, and I will tell communication from you that I believe may be of e, e part of the record of made in open court with the with the court clerk. I have have with them outside of my and their attorneys about any the parties and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate concerning your comfort and safety, suc to assemble for duty, how you should or jury room, and similar inquiries. ith courtroom personnel about matters arking, location of break areas, how and when personal items can be brought into the courthouse + +If you become aware o any dfation of these instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me b g a note to the bailiff. + +# Source: O + +Florida S d Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.2 + +### 201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process + +The last thing I want to do, before we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +Questions/Challenges: This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportunity to get to know a little bit about you, in order to help them come to their own conclusions about your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide who they ink should be the jurors in this case. + +How we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some general qu of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific questions that they will ask er they have asked all of their questions, I will meet with them and they will tell oices for jurors. Each side can ask that I exclude a person from serving on a jury if t ve me a reason to believe that he or she might be unable to be fair and impartial. That is called a challenge for cause. The lawyers also have a certain number of what are-called peremptory challenges, by which they may exclude a person from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of elimination, the remaining persons are selected as the ju It may take more than one conference among the parties, their attorneys, and me before the fi ons are made. + +Purpose of Questioning: The questions tb I will be asked during this process are not intended to embarrass you or unnecessarily p n r personal affairs, but it is important that the parties and their attorneys know enou ou you to make this important decision. If a question is asked that you would prefer er in front of the whole courtroom, just let me know and you can come up here and •v u swer just in front of the attorneys and me. If you have a question of either the attom don't hesitate to let me know. + +Res onse to nin The are no right or wrong answers to the questions that will be asked of you. The only thing tha is that you answer the questions as frankly and as honestly and as completely as yo You [will take] [have taken] an oath to answer all questions truthfully and comp tely ou must do so. Remaining silent when you have information you should disclose i olatio of that oath as well. If a juror violates this oath, it not only may result in having to all over again but also can result in civil and criminal penalties against a juror perso , again, it is very important that you be as honest and complete with your answers bly can. If you don't understand the question, please raise your hand and ask for an on or clarification. + +In sum, this is a process to assist the parties and their attorneys to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you are for this purpose. If, for any reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror, you must tell us. + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.3 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# 101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire + +Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will well and trul this case between the Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and the Counter-Plaintiff, and a true verdict render according to the law and evidence [so help you Godj? + +Source' + +Florida Sbpdard Jury Instruction (Civil) 101.2 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +esA Co + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7 202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a chance to make what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is allowed to give you his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you are likely to, and hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening statements the Counte will bring his witnesses and evidence to you. + +Evidence: Evidence is the information that the law allows y hear in deciding this case. Evidence includes the testimony of the witnesses, docume a Ad anything else that I instruct you to consider. + +Witnesses: A witness is a person who takes an the truth and then answers attorneys questions for the jury. The answering of o tuestions by witnesses is called "giving testimony." Testimony means statements th a when someone has sworn an oath to tell the truth. + +The Counter-Plaintiff's lawyer wil ask a witness the questions first. That is called direct examination. Then the C endant's lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other eviden be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the Counter-Plaintiffs s ave testified, the Counter-Defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses o the t d and go through the same process. Then the Counter-Plaintiffs lawyer gets to do cro ination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that u member that testimony comes from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimon d th re not themselves witnesses. + +Ob. o etimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a questio f a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may make what is called an "ob. e rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are many reasons for attorneys to object. ou should simply wait for me to decide how to proceed. If I say that an objection is "sustained,' that means the witness may not answer the question. If I say that the objection is "overruled," that means the witness may answer the question. + +When there is an objection and I make a decision, you must not assume from that decision that I have any particular opinion other than that the rules for conducting a trial are being correctly followed. If I say a question may not be asked or answered, you must not try to guess what the answer would have been. That is against the rules, too. + +Side Bar Conferences: Sometimes I will need to speak to the attorneys about legal elements of the case that are not appropriate for the jury to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few of these conferences as possible while you are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if we do have to have such a conference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference at the side of my desk so that we do not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroom. + +Recesses: Breaks in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses." During a recess you still have your duties as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been pr a ted to you, I will instruct you in the law that you must follow. It is important that yoyF me r these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which c0 rext, and, later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence ur decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the op make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing , I will instruct you further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you to decide the case. + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury discuss and decide the questions I have put on yo instructions to use during your discussions. are usually called "jury deliberations." Yo anyone else will be with you in the jury , you will go to the jury room and ct orm. You will have a copy of the jury ns you have and the decisions you make ons are absolutely private and neither I nor + +Verdict: When you have fi h lowering the questions, you will give the verdict form to the bailiff, and we will all re ourtroom where your verdict will be read. When that is completed, you will be rele,as ur assignment as a juror. + +What are the rules? + +Finally, be we ZIP' gin the trial, I want to give you just a brief explanation of rules you must follow as th14 c81e proceeds. + +n Mind: You must pay close attention to the testimony and other evidence as it co e trial. However, you must avoid forming any final opinion or telling anyone else yo iews on the case until you begin your deliberations. This rule requires you to keep an open mind ntil you have heard all of the evidence and is designed to prevent you from influencing how your fellow jurors think until they have heard all of the evidence and had an opportunity to form their own opinions. The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and I have instructed you on the law. It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything. + +Consider Only the Evidence: It is the things you hear and see in this courtroom that matter in this trial. The law tells us that a juror can consider only the testimony and other evidence that all the other jurors have also heard and seen in the presence of the judge and the lawyers. Doing anything else is wrong and is against the law. That means that you must not do any work or investigation of your own about the case. You must not obtain on your own any information about the case or about anyone involved in the case, from any source whatsoever. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. You must not visit places mentioned in the trial or use the internet to look at maps or pictures to see any place discussed during trial. + +Do not provide any information about this case to anyone, including friends or family members. Do not let anyone, including the closest family members, make comments to you or ask questions about the trial. Jurors must not have discussions of any sort with friends or family members about the case or the people and places involved. So, do not let even the closest family members make comments to you or ask questions about the trial. In this age of electronic communication, I want to stress again that just as you must not talk about this case face-to-face, you must not talk about this case by using an electronic device. You must not use phones, tablets, computers or other electronic devices to communicate. Do not send or accept any messages related to this case or your jury service. Do not discuss this case or ask for advice by any means at all, including posting information on an Internet website, chat room or blog. + +No Mid-Trial Discussions: When we are in a recess, do not discuss anything about the trial or the case with each other or with anyone else. If attorneys approach you, don't speak with them. The law says they are to avoid contact with you. If an attorney will not look at you or speak to you, do not be offended or form a conclusion about that behavior. The attorney is not supposed to interact with jurors outside of the courtroom and is only following the rules. The attorney is not being impolite. If an attorney or anyone else does try to speak with you or says something about the case in your presence, please inform the bailiff immediately. + +Only the Jury Decides: Only you get to deliberate and answer the verdict questions at the end of the trial. I will not intrude into your deliberations at all. I am required to be neutral. You should not assume that I prefer one decision over another. You should not try to guess what my opinion is about any part of the case. It would be wrong for you to conclude that anything I say or do means that I am for one side or another in the trial. Discussing and deciding the facts is your job alone. + +#### Use of Cell Phones and Electronic Devices in the Courtroom and Jury Room:\* + +*\*The trial judge should select one of the following two alternative instructions explaining the rules governing jurors' use of electronic devices, as explained in Note on Use 3.* + +*Alternative A:* [All cell phones or other types of electronic devices must be turned off while you are in the courtroom. Turned off means that the phone or other electronic device is actually off and not in a silent or vibrating mode. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case] + +or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. After each recess, please double check to make sure your device is turned off. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. You cannot have in the jury room any cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices. If there are breaks in the deliberations, I may allow you to communicate with your family or friends, but do not communicate about the case or your deliberations. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. The court's phone number will be provided to you.] + +*Alternative B:* [You cannot have any cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not use your phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or communicate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not take photographs, video recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow jurors. At the end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with anyone outside the jury room. If there are breaks in the deliberations, I may allow you to communicate with your family or friends, but do not communicate about the case or your deliberations. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the court can receive messages and deliver them to you without delay. The court's phone number will be provided to you.] + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 202.2 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ + +### 202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors + +If you would like to take notes during the trial, you may do so. On the other hand, of course, you are not required to take notes if you do not want to. That will be left up to you individually. + +You will be provided with a note pad and a pen for use if you wish to take notes. Any notes that you take will be for your personal use. However, you should not take them with you from the courtroom. During recesses, the bailiff will take possession of your notes and will re rn them to you when we reconvene. After you have completed your deliberations, the bailiff • liver your notes to me. They will be destroyed. No one will ever read your notes. + +If you take notes, do not get so involved in note-taking that you bee AS0 cted from the proceedings. Your notes should be used only as aids to your memory. + +Whether or not you take notes, you should rely on your mo the evidence and you should not be unduly influenced by the notes of other jurors. of re not entitled to any greater weight than each juror's memory of the evidence. + +# Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 202.3 + +#### 202.4 Juror Questions + +### Questions for the court or courtroom personnel: + +During the trial, you may have a question about these proceedings. If so, please write it down and hand it to the bailiff, who will then hand it to me. I will review your question with the parties and their attorneys before responding. + +# Otrestions for witnesses: + +You also may have a question you think should be asked of a witn for you to request that I ask the witness a question. After all the attome questioning of the witness, you should raise your hand if you have a sufficient time to write the question on a piece of paper, fold it, and pass it to me. Do not put your name on the question, show it to a yon there is a way mpleted their ill then give you the bailiff, who will scuss it with anyone. + +I will then review the question with the attorneys may be considered by a jury in determining a verdict. Y that control the attorneys' questions. If I decide that t of evidence, I will tell you. Otherwise, I will direc then ask follow-up questions if they wish. If t follow the same procedure again. r law, only certain evidence d by the same rules of evidence may not be asked under our rules on to the witness. The attorneys may dditional questions from jurors, we will + +By providing this procedure, I can to suggest that you must or should submit written questions for witnesses. In the lawyers will have asked the necessary questions. + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 202.4 + +#### 301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, Stipulations, and Admissions + +# a. Deposition or prior testimony: + +Members of the jury, the sworn testimony of (name), given before trial, will now be presented. You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any other evidence in the case. + +# b. Interrogatories: + +Members of the jury, answers to interrogatories will now be read to yo written questions that have been presented before trial by one party to ano under oath. You are to consider and weigh these questions and answe evidence in the case. Aill rrog \ stories '' are are answered would any other + +# c. Stipulated testimony: + +Members of the jury, the parties have agreed that i e f witness) were called as a witness, [he] [she] would testify (read or describe the to ou are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any other evidence in the + +# d. Stipulations: + +Members of the jury, the parties have ? S ec\c ., rtain facts. You must accept these facts as true. (Read the agreed facts). + +#### SEE THE PARTIES' NEW JOIN AL STIPULATION FOR COUNTERCLAIM ONLY + +# e. Admissions: + +# I. Applicable to ll peril : + +Members of t jury, id ntify the party or parties that have admitted the facts) [has] [have] admitted certain f . You ust accept these facts as true. (Read the admissions). + +# 2. p bl to fewer than all parties: + +Mem he jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts) [has] [have] admitt facts. You must accept these facts as true in deciding the issues between (identify the affect arties), but these facts should not be used in deciding the issues between (identify the unaffected parties). (Read the admissions). + +# Source\* + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.1 + +**COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11** +**301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, +or Physical Evidence is Admitted** + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received in evidence. Witnesses may testify about or refer to this or any other item of evidence during the remainder of the trial. This and all other items received in evidence will be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the trial. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.2 + +Given \_\_\_\_\_ +Given as Modified \_\_\_\_\_ +Denied \_\_\_\_\_ +Withdrawn \_\_\_\_\_ + +# 301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors + +The (describe item of evidence) has been received in evidence. It is being shown to you now to help you understand the testimony of this witness and other witnesses in the case, as well as the evidence as a whole. You may examine (describe item of evidence) briefly now. It will also be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the trial. + +# Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.3 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +esA Co + +### 301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids + +## a. Generally: + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) to assist in explaining or illustrating [his] [her] testimony. The testimony of the witness is evidence; however, [this] [these] (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) [is] [are] not to be considered as evidence in the case unless received in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence nly items received in evidence will be available to you for consideration during your delibe + +# b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids based on disputed assn + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative aid(s)) n explaining or illustrating [his] [her] testimony. [This] [These] item[s] [has] [have] repared to assist this witness in explaining [his] [her] testimony. [It] [They] may be umptions which you are free to accept or reject. The testimony of the witness • nce; however, [this] [these] (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) [is] [are] not to ed as evidence in the case unless received in evidence, and should not be used cute for evidence. Only items received in evidence will be available to you for con uring your deliberations. + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.4 + +# 301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received into evidence. It has been admitted only [for the purpose of (describe purpose)] [as to (name party)]. You may consider it only [for that purpose] [as it might affect (name party)]. You may not consider that evidence [for any other purpose] [as to [any other party] [(name other party(s)]. + +esA Co 4s) (s, ti o (se source \* + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.5 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +### 301.10 Instruction Before Recess + +We are about to take [our first] [a] recess. Remember that all of the rules I have given you apply even when you are outside the courtroom, such as at recess. + +Remember the basic rule: Do not talk to anyone, including your fellow jurors, friends, family or co-workers about anything having to do with this trial, except to speak to court staff. This means no e-mailing, text messaging, tweeting, blogging, or any other form of co tmication. You cannot do any research about the case or look up any information about the c emember to observe during our recess the other rules I gave you. If you become aware ation of any of these rules at all, notify court personnel of the violation. + +After each recess, please double check to make sure [that your cplFp Ar other electronic device is turned off completely] [that you do not bring your cell pho ther electronic device into the courtroom or jury room]. + +\kJ + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.10 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +#### 406.1 Introduction + +Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the evidence in this case. I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that you must use in reaching your verdict. [You will recall at the beginning of the case I told you that if, at the end of the case I decided that different law applies, I would tell you so. These instructions are (slightly) different from what I gave you at the beginning and it is these rules of law that you must now follow.] When I finish telling you about the rules of law, the attorneys will present their final arguments and will then retire to decide your verdict. cos + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 301.10 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17 406.2 Summary of Claims + +The claims and defenses in this case are as follows: + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, pled a lawsuit called the "original civil proceeding') against Scott Rothstein and Defendant J. . Epstein voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit against before the lawsuit was decided by the Court. Epstein's dismissal of the lawsuit against was without prejudice to Epstein's right to later reassert them. Epstein's lawsuit against Scott Rothstein has been separated from this action rd exists as a separate proceeding. Therefore, those claims are not be ore u for your de ation, but Epstein's original civil proceeding against Rothstein and forms the js o yards' suit against Epstein for malicious prosecution. + +ailed a claim for malicious prosecution against Epstei a eged that Epstein maliciously and without probable cause, filed and continued the on al ci it proceeding against him, and that this caused emotional and reputational it not money damages. Epstein denies that claim and also asserts that he is entitled t ict in his favor. + +has the burden to prove by the greater o the evidence that Epstein caused to be filed or continued the civil proceedin a ainst maliciously and without probable cause and that Epstein's lawsuit caused to suffer amage. + +I will now define some of the terms you will use in deciding this case. + +# Source: + +Florid (S. tillt. Qury Instruction (Civil) 406.2 + +C + +# 406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence + +"Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +Florida Standtud Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.3 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +esA Co + +#### Issues on Claim + +I will now instruct you on what must prove to prevail on his claim for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +maliciously and without probable cause instituted or continued a civil proceeding against The issues you must decide on claim against Epstein are whether." which later terminated in favor of and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of damage to + +must prove each of these elements in order to prevail on li S for malicious prosecution against Epstein. + +I will now instruct you further on the individual elements of 's cla.m. + +iS 4/) 9 + +# Source: + +Second Paragraph: Florida Stan Instruction, but the order first, then explain the ele understand why th v. Mancusi, 632 2015); Hickm ury Instruction 406.8. This paragraph reflects the Standard e instructions has been changed to instruct the jury on the elements the jury. It is Epstein's position this will allow the jury to better re be g instructed on probable cause, malice, etc.; Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. d 13 2 (Fla. 1994); Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA ay's Intl Realty, Inc., 16 So. 3d 154, 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). + +Third Pa Union Rent-A-C tum Bros Real Estate & Investment Co. v. =, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926); 1. Amsco Division v. Ma 468 So. 2d 349, 353 (Fla. 3nd DCA 1985); Alamo Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1355 (Fla. 1994). + +# Probable Cause + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting and then continuing a civil proceeding against another, the facts and circumstances known to .tire Jef ',were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the proceeding against was supported by existing facts. + +It is burden to stage of the civil proceeding against of it. You may find that the allegations in the civil proceeding brought by Jeffrey Epstein were u untrue, or if some of the claims would not have been successful. rove that Jeffrey Epstein lacked probable c se at every from the filing of his suit t rrnination failed to show a lack of probable ca I"sven e some of y shown to be + +The information that Jeffrey Epstein relied on does not have t hand by Jeffrey Epstein, but can be trustworthy information that You may find probable cause existed even if there was proceeding. rmation gained firstded to Jeffrey Epstein. nty of the outcome of the + +You cannot base your finding as to probab has proven that Jeffrey Epstei your findings as to whether there was a lack terminated his civil proceeding against Bra whether or not you believe that malice. Likewise, you cannot base cause on evidence that Jeffrey Epstein + +# Source: + +First Paragraph: Florida S Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.4. + +Second Para show lack of 1172-73 ( did n prosecuti colt v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (must le cause for entire case or claim fails); May v. Fundament, 444 So. 2d 1171, A 1984) (same); Molly v. Bodin, 489 So. 2d 474 (La. Ct. App. 1986) (where lack of probable cause for at least several of allegations, then no malicious + +Third Paragraph:. v. Kostroff, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1354, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2000) (does not have to be fust-hand information); Endacott v. International Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("the defendants need not be certain of the outcome of the underlying proceeding to have probable cause for bringing the counterclaim"). + +Fourth Paragraph: Bros Real Estate & Investment v. =, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926) cannot infer probable cause based on finding of malice); Central Florida Machinery Co., Inc. v. 424 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) ("a bare showing of malice will not, in turn, permit + +an inference of a lack of probable cause"); Applestein v. Preston, 335 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) ("when want of probable cause was not established, the existence thereof could not be inferred from malice, if malice was proved. Although malice may be inferred from want of probable cause, want of probable cause cannot be inferred from malice"); Endacott v. Intl Hosp., Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("However, termination of an underlying civil proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff is not sufficient evidence that the defendants lacked probable cause"). + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied ,O114Isk CO . iS 5) + +#### \lalice + +One acts maliciously in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he or she does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to bring an offender to justice or to establish what he or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Epstein acted maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the conduct complained of, including any lack of probable cause to institute or ntinue the proceeding. + +You are not required, however, to find malice because of a lack institute or continue the proceedings and you should not draw an inferen of probable cause if other evidence of the circumstances at the ti different conclusion. ble cause to a from a lack onduct lead to a + +### Source: + +First Paragraph: Florida Stand Instruction 406.5 + +Second Paragraph: olom Sl6res, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So. 2d 1181, 1185 la. 1977) ("It is recognized that ce inferred from the absence of probable cause. v. Whitfield, 290 So. 2d 49 '74); Duval Jewelry Co. v. , 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878 (Fla. 1931). However, m n• legally synonymous with the absence of probable cause. =I v. Miami Home Mil ers Association, 143 Fla. 518, 197 So. 125 (1940). The inference of malice from t e of probable cause is not one of law but merely a presumption of fact which may be rebuff his is an inference which the jury is not required to draw, and which it should not draw if other facts disclosed by the evidence lead to a different conclusion. See Brothers Real Estate & Investment Co. v. =, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623 (1926). + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 22 406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding + +One is regarded as having instituted or continued a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his or her actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his or her actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted or continued. + +Source. + +%b.) + +Florida Sta dard Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.6 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +CO4S1A + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 406.7 Legal Cause + +#### a. Legal cause generally: + +The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury or damage, so that it can reasonably be said that, but for the malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding, the loss, injury or damage would not have occurred. + +# b. Concurring cause: + +In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, injury or damage the continuation of such a proceeding need not be the only cause. The continuation of a proceeding may be a legal cause of loss, injury or dam in combination with the act of another or some other cause if continuation of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing s institution or institution or ough it operates us institution or , injury or damage. + +### c. Intervening cause: + +The malicious institution or continuation of a proceeding\ injury or damage even though it operates in combi cause occurring after the malicious institution or cause was itself reasonably foreseeable an proceeding contributes substantially to prod injury or damage was a reasonably fo, continuation of a proceeding and the tributes substantially to producing i ay also be a legal cause of loss, tion,with the act of another or some other tarn of a proceeding occurs if such other icious institution or continuation of a oss, injury or damage or the resulting loss, consequence of the malicious institution or institution or continuation of a proceeding con- + +# Source:1O + +Florida S rd Jury Instruction (Civil) 406.7 + +#### Bona Fide Termination + +must prove that the termination of•grfre Epstein's civil proceeding against him was a bona fide termination in favor of + +A termination of a civil proceeding is a bona fide termination of the civil proceeding only if it ended in a manner that demonstrated that the proceeding lacked merit. + +You must consider the reasons for the voluntary dismissal by Jeffrey Epstein his claims against as well as all of the circumstances surrounding the vol dismissal of those claims in making this determination. + +#### Source: + +Giving an instruction: Florida Standard Jury Instructio 06.8, Notes on Use ("If a fact question exists concerning whether the prior proc e nated in favor of the claimant, an additional instruction on that issue will be n ' Shidlowsky v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc., 344 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 19 man v. Crabro Motors, Inc., 199 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). + +First Paragraph: Debrincat v. Fisch prosecution claim); CA Hansen Co 1990) (plaintiff must show eith Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. . 2d 68, 70 (Fla. 2017) (element of malicious ker et al., 565 So. 2d 812, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA e decision on the merits or a bona fide termination); So. 2d 1352, 1356 (Fla. 1994). + +Second Paragraph: Shar E&A, Inc., 135 So. 3d 428, 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 115 1 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)). + +Third Paragra v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2008) ("whether a voluntary di q lifies as a `bona fide termination' of the proceedings in the defendant's favor dep ti. w the reasons and circumstances underlying the dismissal"); Doss v. Bank of Ameri 857 So. 2d 991, 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("whether a withdrawal or abandonment of a laws constitutes a bona fide termination in favor of a person against whom the suit was brought d •ends on the total circumstances surrounding the withdrawal or abandonment"). + +### 406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim + +If the greater weight of the evidence does not support l=g claim, your verdict should be for Jeffrey Epstein. + +However, if thee. weight of the evidence supports claim, then your verdict should be for and against Jeffrey Epstein. + +Go + +Source: + +Florid IardJuryy Instruction (Civil) 406.9 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +# 406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages + +Ificand for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for , you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compensate for such damage as the greater weight of the evidence shows was caused by the institution or continuation of the proceeding complained of. 'sA Co + +Source: + +Florida Sbpdard Jury Instructions (Civil) 406.12 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +#### 601.1 Weighing the Evidence + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your answers will be. Your agreed-upon answers to my questions are called your jury verdict. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of the witnes received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to by the parti which the court instructs you to accept. all exhibits any fact of + +In reaching your verdict, you must think about and weigh documents, photographs, or other material that has been received) consider any facts that were admitted or agreed to by the lawye what the facts are. You may use reason and common sense draw reasonable inferences from the evidence. But you sh not covered here. And, you must always apply the law Sti I1ony and any e. You may also job is to determine o r onclusions. You may guess about things that were xplained it to you. + +Source\* + +Florida Staa,glard Jury Instruction (Civil) 601.1 + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28 601.2 Believability of Witnesses + +#### a. General considerations: + +Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the de anor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; the int It nce of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the case; the mean ortunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witness testified; the abili o the itness to remember the matters about which the witness testified; and the reasonabl the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of all the evidence in the case and ig t of your own experience and common sense. + +# b. Expert witnesses: + +You have heard opinion testimony on certain technical su ec from a person referred to as an expert witness. You may accept such opinion testimony, reject , or give it the weight you think it deserves, considering the knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education of the witness, the reasons given by the witness for the opinion express , and,all the other evidence in the case. + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 601.2 + +# 601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument) + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attomeys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +Source; + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 601.5 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +esA Co + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 30 700 Closing Instructions + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have a few last instructions for you. + +During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case only with one nother and only when all jurors are present in the jury room. You will have in the jury room all f t e evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching your decision, do not do any ho ur own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, the Internet, or any other referenc ena s. Do not investigate the case or conduct any experiments. Do not visit or view of any event involved in this case or look at maps or pictures on the Internet. If you to ass by the scene, do not stop or investigate. All jurors must see or hear the same evide i ce at same time. Do not read, listen to, or watch any news accounts of this trial. + +You are not to communicate with any person outsi about this case. Until you have reached a verdict, you must not talk about this i n or through the telephone, writing, or electronic communication, such as a blo mail, text message, or any other means. Do not contact anyone to assist you, such ccountant, doctor, or lawyer. These communications rules apply until I discharge yo en of the case. + +If you become aware of any violati instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by n e to the bailiff. + +Any notes you have taken trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes a aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are bi ing conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own memory or that of other jurors. d, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors bas e evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the co ion the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. I ever read your notes. + +In our verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public opinion, or any other senti r against any party to influence your decision. Your verdict must be based on the evidence has been received and the law on which I have instructed you. + +Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot participate in that decision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdict should be from something I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer one verdict over another. Therefore, in reaching your verdict, you should not consider anything that I have said or done, except for my specific instructions to you. + +Pay careful attention to all the instructions that I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a copy of my instructions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the instructions are important, and you must consider all of them together. There are no other laws that apply to this case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must use them in reaching your decision in this case. + +When you go to the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as a foreperson during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussions are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have co idered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if yo convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not up r honest beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that d your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case. + +I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answ r. I h already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You t ollow my instructions and the form carefully. You must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions in the order they appear. After you answer a question, the tel you what to do next. I will now read the form to you: (read form of verdict)] + +You will be given (state number) forms of d dhich I shall now read to you: (read form of verdict) + +If you find for verdict) , yo leCts dill be in the following form: (read form of + +If you find for Jeffrey Ep o erdict will be in the following form: (read form of verdict) + +Your verdict must be When you have agreed write the date and si it a bus, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. verdict and finished filling out the form, your foreperson must ttom and return the verdict to the bailiff + +If any of to communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it to the bailiff. In of , do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. + +ow retire to decide your verdict. + +# Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 700 + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 31 JBIFURCATED ISSUE]. 503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES' + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +for his conduct in maliciously prosecuting a civil proceeding against claims that punitive damages should be awarcalinst y Epstein unitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convi ence that Jeffrey Epstein was raifintentional misconduct or gross negligence, a substantial cause of damage to . Under those circumstances yo your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convin' ce does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted t Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Ep actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and that there was a high p at injury or damage to and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally at course of conduct, resulting m injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious di or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" is more compelling and persuasive evidence" means the more persu case. the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it e already instructed you, "greater weight of the vincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the + +If you decide that punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein, then we will have a separate proceeding in w \*ch,to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment agains ffrey pstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensa amages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consi wing: + +- ( the fol extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including + - (A) whether the wrongful conduct was motivated solely by unreasonable financial + - (B) whether the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, was actually known by Jeffrey Epstein; gain; + +&#x27; Punitive damages have been bifurcated from the main trial, so that this instruction should not be given unless it becomes appropriate. + +(C) whether, at the time of damage, Jeffrey Epstein had a specific intent to harm [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein did in fact harm [REDACTED] [REDACTED], and + +(2) the financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein; and + +However, you may not award an amount that would financially destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +You may in your discretion decline to assess punitive damages. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +Source: + +Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 503.2 + +Given + +Given as Modified + +Denied + +Withdrawn + +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ + +### Adverse Inference - Fifth Amendment + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and an adverse inference may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit. + +Therefore, if you find that Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment asked relevant questions, then you may, but are not required to, infer that his have incriminated him. You may consider this, together with the other evi the issues of this case, but a Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein cannot rest inference. e when rs wtuld determining the adverse + +# Source: + +Florida Instruction (Civil) 301.11a; Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976); Coqui ents v. Rothstein, No. 10-60787-cv, 2012 WL 4479057 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2012) + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff + +# VERDI T F + +We, the Jury, find: + +1. Did prove ir•t had no probable cause to initiate on e his original civil proceeding against ter weight of the evidence that aJ i + +> YES NO + +If the Answer to Question t sI4PVES" then proceed to Question 2. If the Answer to Question I is "NO," then please e and gn the verdict form and proceed no further. + +Cos + +2. prove by the greater weight of the evidence that Jeffrey Epstein i continued his original civil proceeding against maliciously? + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 2 is "YES" then proceed to Question 3. If the Answer to Question 2 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +3. Did prove by the greater weight of the evidence that the termination of Jeffrey Epstein's original civil proceeding constituted a bona fide termination of that proceeding in favor of + +YES NO + +If the Answer to Question 3 is "YES" then proceed to Question 4. If the Answer to Question 3 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and proceed no further. + +4. Did prove by the greater weight of the Epstein's institution or continuation of his original civil proceeding a caused damage to IM' 1 til y that ley + +If the Answer to Question 4 is "YES" proceed to Qu it e Answer to Question 4 is "NO," then please date and sign the verdict form and pro o no her. + +5. What amount of damage, of the evidence, that he suffered as a original civil proceeding against B prove, by the greater weight rey Epstein's institution or continuation of his + +civil proceeding against ards prove that punitive damages are warrantedisbnishment to Jeffrey Epstein fo or continuing his original 6. Did Brad and as a deterren to ers from filing a civil proceeding without probable cause? + +NO + +YOU HAVE REACHED YOUR VERDICT. PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THIS VERDICT FORM + +SO SAY WE ALL, this day of December, 2018. + +FOREPERSON \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9e00b039ebd7240f481d745f63683eecbefa5e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741/EFTA02768741.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3694 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768741.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 48, + "chars": 77950, + "elapsed_seconds": 18.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF IN'S \nNOTICE OF NEW REOUESTED JURY INST S AND VERDICT FORM \nBASED ON SEPARATE TRIAL OF COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 521.2822265625, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 521.2822265625, + 365.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 365.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 379.89 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 393.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 393.65999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 495.9674987792969, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 495.9674987792969, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.1 Oath of Jurors Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.17364501953125, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 406.17364501953125, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 \nQualifications Instruction Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 495.4237365722656, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 495.4237365722656, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 3 201.1 Description of the Case Before Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.28, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 493.884, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 116.28, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 \n201.2 Introduction of Participants and Their Roles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.0018615722656, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.0018615722656, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source: O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 530.7487487792969 + ], + [ + 209.2785186767578, + 530.7487487792969 + ], + [ + 209.2785186767578, + 576.7300109863281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 576.7300109863281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.68499755859375, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.68499755859375, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.3 Explanation of the Voir Dire Process", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 418.420166015625, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 418.420166015625, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.04248046875, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.04248046875, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "101.2 Oath of Juror After Voir Dire", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.14, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.98199462890625, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 400.98199462890625, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 211.14, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7 \n202.2 Explanation of the Trial Procedure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.3234558105469, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.3234558105469, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Use of Cell Phones and Electronic Devices in the Courtroom and Jury Room:*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 487.15200000000004, + 582.39 + ], + [ + 487.15200000000004, + 596.97 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 596.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.82501220703125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 496.82501220703125, + 82.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 82.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 Note-Taking by Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 383.646484375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 383.646484375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 112.15550994873047, + 590.49 + ], + [ + 112.15550994873047, + 606.1800079345703 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 606.1800079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 496.1709289550781, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 496.1709289550781, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 Juror Questions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 365.99847412109375, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 365.99847412109375, + 96.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 96.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for the court or courtroom personnel:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.94635009765625, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 307.94635009765625, + 137.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 137.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Otrestions for witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 204.9375 + ], + [ + 192.39236450195312, + 204.9375 + ], + [ + 192.39236450195312, + 220.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 220.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 578.34 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 578.34 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 591.3 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.4125061035156, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.4125061035156, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, \nStipulations, and Admissions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.968, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 481.5328369140625, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 481.5328369140625, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 130.968, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 251.22869873046875, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 251.22869873046875, + 148.9925537109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 148.9925537109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 181.60305786132812, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 181.60305786132812, + 219.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 219.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 205.84869384765625, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 205.84869384765625, + 302.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 302.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Stipulations:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 165.3812255859375, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 165.3812255859375, + 373.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 373.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SEE THE PARTIES' NEW JOIN AL STIPULATION FOR COUNTERCLAIM \nONLY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 543.05859375, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 543.05859375, + 445.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 445.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Admissions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 162.7306671142578, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 162.7306671142578, + 468.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 468.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Applicable to ll peril :", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 251.9600067138672, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 251.9600067138672, + 490.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 490.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. p bl to fewer than all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 307.85498046875, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 307.85498046875, + 550.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 98.53200000000001, + 550.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 622.89 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 638.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 638.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11 301.2 Instruction When First Item of Documentary, Photographic, or Physical Evidence is Admitted", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 497.5559999999999, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.427490234375, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.427490234375, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 Instruction When Evidence is First Published to Jurors", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1021423339844, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 466.1021423339844, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 605.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 605.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 111.74470520019531, + 620.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 620.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.6065673828125, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.6065673828125, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 80.80743408203125 + ], + [ + 459.2274169921875, + 80.80743408203125 + ], + [ + 459.2274169921875, + 95.4200439453125 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 95.4200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 156.01596069335938, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 156.01596069335938, + 137.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 137.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids based on disputed assn", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 232.46999999999997 + ], + [ + 473.076, + 247.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 247.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 591.3 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 605.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 605.0699999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 14", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.8875427246094, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.8875427246094, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.152, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4412841796875, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 431.4412841796875, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 181.152, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 110.16, + 609.12 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 609.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.4759521484375, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.4759521484375, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.10 Instruction Before Recess", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.484, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 392.8785705566406, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 392.8785705566406, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 218.484, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.950927734375, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.950927734375, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 356.68133544921875, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 356.68133544921875, + 95.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 95.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17 \n406.2 Summary of Claims", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.7897033691406, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.7897033691406, + 96.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 96.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 551.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 551.7324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.4078063964844, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.4078063964844, + 82.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 Greater Weight of the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 405.4071350097656, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 405.4071350097656, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.0909118652344, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.0909118652344, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Issues on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.1366271972656, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 349.1366271972656, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 456.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 456.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.3819580078125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.3819580078125, + 81.91998291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 81.91998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Probable Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 350.0716552734375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 350.0716552734375, + 95.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 95.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 111.3901596069336, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 111.3901596069336, + 482.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 482.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED TRY INSTRUCTION NO. 21", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 497.7749938964844, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 497.7749938964844, + 81.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 81.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\\lalice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.804, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.47357177734375, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 326.47357177734375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 456.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 456.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 22 \n406.6 Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.41876220703125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.41876220703125, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 \n406.7 Legal Cause", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.989990234375, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.989990234375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 214.1842498779297, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 214.1842498779297, + 123.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 123.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Concurring cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 201.69 + ], + [ + 194.33541870117188, + 201.69 + ], + [ + 194.33541870117188, + 216.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 216.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 193.63841247558594, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 193.63841247558594, + 322.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 322.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:1O", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 151.40374755859375, + 555.6600000000001 + ], + [ + 151.40374755859375, + 571.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 571.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.9134216308594, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.9134216308594, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Bona Fide Termination", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 368.6392517089844, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 368.6392517089844, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 243.57600000000002, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 111.73519897460938, + 318.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 318.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.37310791015625, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.37310791015625, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 390.38665771484375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 390.38665771484375, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.8974914550781, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.8974914550781, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 Malicious Prosecution Damages", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 408.93145751953125, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 408.93145751953125, + 95.41998291015625 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 95.41998291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 27", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.1809387207031, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 499.1809387207031, + 81.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 81.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 Weighing the Evidence", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 382.9072570800781, + 81.64501953125 + ], + [ + 382.9072570800781, + 95.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 95.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28 \n601.2 Believability of Witnesses", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 499.30279541015625, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 499.30279541015625, + 123.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 123.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. General considerations:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 221.2665252685547, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 221.2665252685547, + 165.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 165.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Expert witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 188.61505126953125, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 188.61505126953125, + 302.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 302.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 29", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.0049133300781, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 499.0049133300781, + 82.10302734375 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 449.76611328125, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 449.76611328125, + 95.60302734375 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 95.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 30 \n700 Closing Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.90374755859375, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.90374755859375, + 96.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 96.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 112.12422180175781, + 586.4399999999999 + ], + [ + 112.12422180175781, + 602.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 602.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 31 \nJBIFURCATED ISSUE]. \n503.2 PUNITIVE DAMAGES'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.80218505859375, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 498.80218505859375, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.44122314453125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 498.44122314453125, + 82.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 113.83200000000001, + 82.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Adverse Inference - Fifth Amendment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 407.0528259277344, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 407.0528259277344, + 97.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 207.46800000000002, + 97.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Source:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 114.58026123046875, + 524.88 + ], + [ + 114.58026123046875, + 540.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 540.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 543.1409301757812, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 543.1409301757812, + 109.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 109.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDI T F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 354.96, + 343.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 343.99249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768741" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2037c63cbfc33728ebbf467a8599463ae10a3bcb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.md @@ -0,0 +1,414 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +# eTh MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEN'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS + +J. ('S '), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to this Court's oral ruling at the November 2, 2018 hearing and its Order on Briefing for In Camera Inspection entered November 9, 2018 files this Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for an In Camera Inspection e- and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +1. At the Novem Led 018 hearing, the Court outlined the briefing schedule for the in camera inspection rec;rarto =I' privileged materials. In response to undersigned counsel's concern that Epstein's counsel had already seen, reviewed, and analyzed these privileged materials, and placed them in the public Court record', the Court explicitly stated that Epstein was to simply file a "generic" motion for in camera inspection, and that any substantive discussion of the e-mails would be limited to a confidential memorandum of law to be submitted to the Court under seal: + +I Despite MI knowledge that the e-mails were listed on Mi privilege log an were the subject of a Federal Court order. See below. + +THE COURT: Well, that may be. That may be fine for legal argument, but I want to get to the practical aspects of trying to -- for my own purpose, be able to adequately review the legal arguments in connection with the emails at issue. And at least from the attorneys' standpoint, and Mr. Epstein's standpoint, as I understand it, the cat is out of the bag in that regard. So, I can't undo what's already been done, and that's been years ago. + +MR. SCAROLA: So we don't want to aggravate the problem. + +THE COURT: And I agree. That's why I'm saying that I think the best approach would be for a motion to be filed of a generic quality that does not mention any contents of these emails, but simply tees it up, so to speak, with the understanding on this record today that any substantive discussion of those emails will be done under seal by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and will continue to be under seal, and will be filed under seal in case of a need for appellate review. + +11/2/2018 Hearing Transcript at 122:20-123:8 (excerpt copy attached hereto as Exhibit `A'). + +2. On November 9, 2018, the Court-ennteredl.its Order on Briefing for In Camera Inspection, in which it reiterated that any put e filinv, by Epstein was limited solely to a "generic" motion for in camera inspection: z + +> On or before November 9,'2018, Epstein shall file a generic Motion for an in camera inspection. + +Order at ¶ 4 (copy attached hereto as Exhibit 13'). + +3. In contrast, any citation or reference to the privileged emails was to be made in the sealed Memorandum of Law: + +Separately, Epstein shall file under seal a detailed Memorandum of Law in which Epstein's counsel may specifically cite and refer to the 47-emails at issue . . . + +Order at ¶ 5. + +4. In what can only be described as a complete disregard for this Court's rulings and the sacrosanct nature of a privilege assertion, Epstein instead filed a 20-page (!) Motion for in camera inspection, complete with over 120 pages of exhibits. Epstein's motion accuses of a deliberate attempt to "conceal" the privileged emails on the privilege log,2 of falsely asserting privilege where none existed, 3 potential perjury,4 and application of the crime-fraud exception with respect to ' purported conduct.s A copy of Epstein's Motion, excluding exhibits, is attached hereto as Exhibit 'C'. + +5. And, despite the Court's explicit direction that the contents of thestwc i nails were not to be discussed, Epstein repeatedly addresses the e-mails in a substanti " ier throughout his unauthorized pleading: S + +"The 30-emails . . . eviscerate ' damages claim an iontrovert . . . representations . . . regarding the weakn of ' clients' damages claims . . . ' association with Rothst . the litigation tactics in which improperly engaged, and they destroy e overall credibility of allegations against Epstein."6 + +\\-/- "[T]he e-mails directly debunk Edwards' isssertion that he had no involvement with Rothstein, that he acted properly in the litigation, and that there is nothing to demonstrate any weakness in Edwards' now-settled three clients' claims against Epstein.° + +[T]he e-mails implicate the crime-fraud exception due to] Rothstein's and working together.s' le + +"[T]hese e-mails are case-ending or worse."9 + +E.g. Motion at p. 12 + +3 Id. at 8 + +See id. at 4. + +Id at 17. + +6 M. at 6. + +&#x27;Id at 16. + +Id at 17. + +9 Id. at 9. + +6. There is nothing "generic" about this public filing, which is clearly a "substantive" discussion" of the emails that the Court explicitly stated was to be made in the confidential filing. Any claim that the discussion of the general contents of the privileged e-mails, but not the specific contents, was permitted by the Court's order completely ignores the explicit directions of this Court. In fact, this filing appears to be nothing more than another attempt to utilize privilege information that Epstein should never have had possession of, and to inject salacioa§ allegations into the public record in order to smear , with the hopes that the l ill seize on this information, report on it, and ultimately taint the jury pool. + +7. As recent discovery in the bankruptcy proceeding has ILI, however, this is not the first time that Epstein has attempted to knowingly d materials in violation of a court order. + +8. As this Court is aware, in March 2iik, stein sought to admit these emails on the eve of trial without requesting an in camera inspection. It was who notified the Court that these emails were on privilege tog since 2011, and it was who notified the Court of the existence of Judge 'Bay's Bankruptcy Order restricting the use of these emails. + +9. has learned, however, that Epstein was aware that these emails were listed on privilege log before he added them to his proposed Trial Exhibit List in early March 2018,1° and Epstein was likely also aware that these emails were the subject of Judge Ray's Order." + +1° See Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott Link, Esq., attached hereto as Exhibit 'D', att iat, prior to filing Epstein's Trial Exhibit List: "I recognized that some documents wer listed on a Isiel Jaffe's privilege sI g[.)" + +&quot; Although Mr. Link dances around this subject in his deposition testimony, and was instructed not to answer certain questions by counsel, the testimony that was provided eviscerates any credible claim that Epstein was not aware of Judge Ray's order before attempting to admit these privileged materials on the eve of the March 2018 trial date. + +10. Epstein failed to disclose either fact to this Court. + +11. This Court should not permit Epstein to continue to ignore Court orders and to continue to act with complete disregard for the sacrosanct nature of a privilege assertion. This Court was clear: Epstein was to file a "generic" motion to simply tee up the issue. Epstein blatantly ignored that Order. As a consequence, Epstein's Motion should be struck and fees should be awarded in favor of + +WHEREFORE, J. respectfully requests that the • enter an Order granting this Motion to Strike Epstein's Motion for an In Camer' n of 30 E-Mails, awarding his fees and costs for bringing this motion, as I1 arding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper given the circum + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correc Blythe foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 13th day o T0 ber, 2018. + +> CAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169 DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: ScarolaTeam®searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com; tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Phone: (561)-727-3600 + +Fax: (561)-727-3601 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +marc@nuriklaw.com + +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Phone: (954)-745-5849 + +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) ) ) Petitioner/Counter-Defendant, ) ) vs. No. 50-2009CA040800X XXMBAG ) SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ) and ff. ) (:.(1 s lfre J. individually, I ) ) + +§5e )ach, Florida + +p er 2nd, 2018 + +:25 a.m. - 1:06 p.m. + +Aqt r Plaintiff/C efendant Epstein's Motion to + +y7r + +Allow Am ent to Exhibit List, et al. + +c(S The above-styled cause came on for hearing \\), ore the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, Presiding Judge, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, on the 2nd day of November, 2018. + +![](_page_7_Picture_9.jpeg) + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 attorneys'-eyes-only documents that were handed over that do not include the documents that are listed on the privilege log. And that's what we're talking about here. We're talking about privileged documents. The fact that they obtained those documents improperly does no give them any greater right, if anything gives them a lesser right, to challe this point, the assertion of priv + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: Well, that m e. That may be fine for legal argument u want to get to the practical aspec ying to -- for my own purpose, be abl cos equately review the legal arguments i n ection with the emails at issue. east from the attorneys' standpoi . Epstein's standpoint, as I understan the cat is out of the bag in that `fi So, I can't undo what's already n done, and that's been years ago. + +20 21 ,10:..) 4, MR. SCAROLA: So we don't want to aggravate the problem. + +22 23 24 25 THE COURT: And I agree. That's why I'm saying that I think the best approach would be for a motion to be filed of a generic quality that does not mention any contents of these + +1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 emails, but simply tees it up, so to speak, with the understanding on this record today that any substantive discussion of those emails will be done under seal by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and will continue to be under seal, and will be filed under seal in case of a need for appella review. + +9 10 11 12 13 14 So that is going to be the d ct, n of s the Court, that the motion be ed, but that the memorandum be sent und to this Court, hand-delivered , ealed. And the same response memor e sent to me under seal by Mr. Edwar s ounsel a week later. + +15 16 MR. 11;:c ) shared with each other, though? C T: Absolutely, for attorneys' + +17 18 THE fm + +19 A; MR. LINK: Understood. + +20 21 22 23 "m,,s e, THE COURT: Okay? And Mr. 0 , I \\,. understand, is co-counsel, so he has the right to look at them. But it's not to be distributed to anyone else -- + +24 MR. LINK: Understand. It's very clear. + +25 THE COURT: -- until I issue an order of + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +CO + +## ORDER ON BRIEFING FOR IN C 4 SPECTION ) + +THIS MATTER came before the Cou \ "Cc unter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") request for an in camerainspec 4S. of , e-mails that Counter-Plaintiff J. (e) claims are privil ourt, hereby + +ORDERS AND ADJUDG ws: + +I. For the sole p se of briefing a memorandum of law for the in camera proceedings, Epstein's c . may unseal the envelope maintained in their offices of the following 47 e- wards alleges are privileged: + +| Ex. No. 13-1 | No. 02645 | App. No. | +|--------------|-------------|----------| +| 13-4 | 00149 | 35 | +| 13-5 | 01527 | 3 | +| 13-6 | 04493-04495 | | +| 13-7 | 00014 | 36 | +| 13-11 | 00090 | 37 | +| 13-13 | 00133 | 68 | +| 13-15 | 08006 | 31 | +| 13-17 | 00026 | 70 | +| 13-19 | 01004 | 71 | +| 13-25 | 12289 | 33 | + +EXHIBIT + +| Ex. No. | [REDACTED] No. | App. No. | +|---------|----------------|----------| +| 13-30 | 26481 | | +| 13-34 | 26480 | 60 | +| 13-35 | 26356 | | +| 13-36 | 26570 | | +| 13-44 | 03731-03732 | | +| 13-45 | 06406-06408 | | +| 13-46 | 01686 | 48 | +| 13-47 | 11123-11125 | 50 | +| 13-49 | 11126-11127 | 32 | +| 13-52 | 25925 | | +| 13-53 | 25874 | | +| 13-56 | 11145 | | +| 13-60 | 03191-03192 | 4 | +| 13-66 | 04398-04402 | 2, 34 | +| 13-67 | 04408-04412 | 1 | +| 13-86 | 26747 | 11 | +| 13-88 | 08042-08044 | 16 | +| 13-89 | 26741-26742 | 13, 15 | +| 13-90 | 08059-08061 | 17 | +| 13-93 | 26756-26758 | 9 | +| 13-94 | 08036-08038 | 19 | +| 13-97 | 26762 | 8 | +| 13-98 | 01117 | 21 | +| 13-100 | 08121-08123 | 20 | +| 13-101 | 26749-26752 | 23 | +| 13-102 | 08128-08130 | 24 | +| 13-103 | 08118-08120 | 22 | +| 13-104 | 08131-08133 | 25 | +| 13-105 | 08124-08126 | 26 | +| 13-106 | 08135-08138 | 10 | +| 13-107 | 27494 | 27 | +| 13-108 | 26760 | | +| 13-110 | 25997 | 28 | +| 13-111 | 25937 | 67 | +| 13-113 | 26604-26605 | 56 | +| 13-116 | 07019-07021 | | + +NOT COPY + +2. These 47 e-mails may be viewed, over objection, by Epstein's attorneys of record in this case only and may not be shared with Epstein or anyone else. The Court recognizes that is co-counsel and is the party asserting the privileges at issue. strictions on viewing the documents do not apply to him. + +3. shall deliver copies of the 47 e-mails at issue to T ble Donald W. Hafele in a sealed envelope on or before November 9, 2018. + +4. On or before November 9, 2018. Epstein shal generic Motion for the In camera inspection. + +5. Separately, Epstein shall file under Memorandum of Law in which Epstein's counsel may specifically cite and reff \o 1(c t 07 e-mails at issue. The Memorandum is for attorneys' eyes only and may not be Epstein. Copies of Epstein's Memorandum of Law shall be delivered in a d n ope to The Honorable Donald W. Hafele and to counsel. After prep tio e Memorandum, the Memorandum and the allegedly privileged documents shat th be sealed pending further order of the Court. objections to further review o (fS allegedly 6 privileged documents by anyone acting on behalf of Epstein and reference by • 's unsel to the contents of the documents prior to a ruling on the propriety of Epstein's ion of the documents and his late listing of the documents as trial exhibits arc overruled t rmit the preparation and filing of the sealed Memorandum of Law. + +6. On or before November 16. 2018, shall file his Response Memorandum of Law under seal. The Memorandum is for attorneys' eyes only and shall not be shared with Epstein. Copies of the Response Memorandum shall be delivered in a sealed envelope to The Honorable Donald W. Hafele and Epstein's counsel. + +7. The Court shall schedule a hearing on these issues either before or during the week of November 26, 2018. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this day of November, 2018. + +![]()SERVICE LIST + +| Jack Scarola
Karen E. Terry
David P. Vitale, Jr.
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
mep@searcylaw.com
jsx@searcylaw.com
dvitale@searcylaw.com
scarolateam@searcylaw.com
terryteam@searcylaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Philip M. Burlington
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [REDACTED] J. Edwards
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] | Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | + +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| + +NOTA A CERTIFICATE OF COPY + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and =M . J. , individually, + +#### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPS iinwi'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS + +Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), moves' this Court for an in camera inspection of 302 e-mails identified on Epstein's March 2, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List and to find that no privilege applies to them. These e-mails directly contradict sworn testimony and repeated misrepresentations before this Court. an officer of this Court, previously disclosed all of these e-mails to another adversary, thereby eliminating any privilege or work product protection that ever could have been applicable to them, and then improperly withheld them from discovery by Epstein and what appears to be a deliberate concealment of them in a noncompliant privilege log, previously ruled by the Court to be legally deficient, based on false claims + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +2Epstein has reduced the original 47 e-mails for in camera review down to 30 e-mails. + +![](_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg) + +&#x27;The original Motion was filed on March 5, 2018, but not ruled on before the March 9, 2018, appellate court stay. The parties further agreed to stay hearings on pending motions until mediation was completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching on December 4, 2018, this Court instructed Epstsjajage this Motion and deliver the accompanying sealed Memorandum by November 9, 2018. was instructed to deliver a response sealed Memorandum by November 16, 2018.

of irrelevancy and attorney-client privilege and claims of work product that could no longer possibly be applicable under Florida law.; Following this Court's in camera review, Epstein seeks a ruling from this Court that these 30 e-mails must be unsealed and properly included on Epstein's Exhibit List.

PREFACE

The Bankruptcy Court, The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, entered an Order on October 29, 2018 (Exhibit 1), discharging the Order to Show Cause against Epstein in relation to the "disc" on which the e-mails were discovered. As of the time of this submission, Judge Ray has not yet determined whether= =, Epstein's counsel at the time of the November 2010 Agreed Order (and from whom Link & Rockenbach, PA received the disc4), violated the Agreed Order. is hoping that this Court will refuse to conduct an in camera inspection because of a possible finding by Judge Ray that=- negligently or inadvertently held the disc in its storage facility for some number of years. Even if Judge Ray makes such a determination, this Court should not excuse er Jaffe's) failure to produce all of these e-mails as they were required to do and repro ey would in 2011.

Importantly, this Cou und that Link & Rockenbach, PA did nothing wrong relating to its discovery and use le?Iiel t tiedisc:

;Farmer Jaffe agreed to produce all work-product related to closed cases to Epstein' testimony that was 4At theil earing and for the first time, EpagjiCapounsel learned from Lilly given two discs from the Jaffe firm to create two sets of hard copy documents that was created for Spec' e stamped. This ur v testimony demonstrated that the "disc" Carney Wait for or Epstein. The disc was made because, according to Lilly 'al Carney did not want 27,542 bate stamped pages of documents. Rather, Sp the disc came back into ey wanted a searchable disc. It is still a how and when possession after it was sent to Special Carney and no evidence has been presented to resolve that question definitively.

  • "I'm not Liing fault with anything you or Miss Rockenbach or Miss did. That's not the issue. You've done your job." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 59: l -4.)5
  • "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss =IMI or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit in the manner in which they had to do it and the timing, unfortunately, of the matter from their perspective in having to do it ..." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 61:15-21.)

IN CAMERA REVIEW 'CV Epstein requests that the 30 e-mails remain unsealed for the f the in camera inspection and counsel for both parties be allowed to review and p nt a ument as to each email. This is the same protocol agreed to by= Jaffe i hen the Special= was contemplating this same review. That is,= Jaffe a rn over work product materials except for materials related to new or ongoing cases conditioned on a "For Attorneys' Eyes Only" basis until such time as the Court overruled any privilege claim upon the Special M. (or Court's) review with counsel present. Exhibit 3.)

During its in camera revi urt must consider and determine:

  • i s -
  • 1. The e-mails are meetly relevant to the issues for trial and no Binger6 "surprise in fact" exists regarding them;
  • 2. Irasvork e product protection existed, it was waived or excepted (ASbased on:
  • a. = Jaffe's express agreement to turn over all work product O 'n 's attorneys;
    • b. ' production to Razorback victims/adversaries;
    • c. ' issue injection; and
    • d. Crime fraud exception;
    • 3. The e-mails do not constitute attornev-client communications.

5Excerpts alp March 8, 2018, afternoon hearing transcript are attached s Exhibit 2.

6Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981).

BACKGROUND

A. Discovery of Deliberately Concealed E-Mails

As this Court is well aware, in February 2018, Link & Rockenbach, PA discovered documents that were voluntarily produced years ago by... to his potential adversaries at the time — the Razorback plaintiffs. These e-mails directly contradict ' sworn testimony and positions taken by in this action. Importantly, the e-mails eviscerate Edwards' claim for emotional distress damages, and worse — they illustrate that MI Provided suspect testimony in this action about his anxiety over being sued by Epstein. They also directly contradict sworn testimony regarding interaction with Ponzi-schemer Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and the strength/weakness ofMNI' clients' damage claims a ainst Epstein, both which have become critical factual issues in this case.

First and foremost, the e-mails have beak y relevant in light of sworn testimony that Epstein's lawsuit has caused him daily anxiety (emotional damages and credibility). Next, the e-mails are direct evidence controverting factual claims made by that he argues disproves probable cause, such as his interaction with Rothstein on the Epstein cases and the known "weakness" of the tort claimants' damages. While the e-mails only became known to Epstein's current counsel earlier this year, has known of them from the time of their existence! Moreover, thee-trails were produced by approximately eight years ago to counsel for Razorback, Edwards' adversary at the time. knowing how potentially damaging the emails are to him professionally, let alone their terminating effect on this lawsuit, has desperately taken multiple positions that Epstein's current counsel improperly obtained the e-mails (proven to be untrue), that none of the e-mails were ever produced (incorrect), and that they are all protected

subject to attorney-client privilege (false) and/or the work product doctrine (waived or broken by exceptions if ever applicable).

B. a Deceptively Concealed the E-Mails and Clearly Violated Rule 1.280(b)(6) as Previously Determined by the Court

is responsible for improperly withholding these undeniably relevant e-mails from Epstein for more than eight years after specifically agreeing to turn over a work product to Epstein's lawyers. Specifically, Jaffe agreed:

[February 2, 2011) All work product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for materials related to new or ongoing cases AND on the condition that they be produced "For Attottc; Eyes Only. (Exhibit 3.)

Unfortunately, this promise to produce al work prodat Vw How. Although Jaffe did in fact turn over purported work product specifi b4r,sy g to a three clients' cases against Epstein, which had then been settled in July 2 it did not turn over the e-mails in question relating to those same cases. Further, in order to ensure that the e-mails would never see the light of the courtroom, concealed their existence by hiding them within a deceptively worded 1,607-entry, 159-page privilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David M, found to be insufficient on its fat:sand not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and 27G Ins. Corp. v. M, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the disc that were listed on his privilege log had fit been produced. However, this is demonstrably inaccurate. Specifically, on May 7, 2012, Edwards produced 163 pages representing 89 documents identified on his 159-page privilege log. In addition, a counsel suggested that Link & Rockenbach received the evidence from

&#x27;Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 has been amended since the Court's Order and privilege claims are now addressed in subsection (6) of that Rule.

attorney William Scherer (Razorback's counsel). Although that is inaccurate, it demonstrates that any potential work-product protection has been waived by virtue of production to at least one other potentially adverse party in separate litigation.

C. The Truth and this Court's Process-Driven "Level Playing Field"

This Court has repeatedly expressed its intention to preserve the integrity of the judicial process and maintain a level playing field between the parties in order to ensure a fair trial. Now is the time for process and this balance to yield the truth.

Consistent with this Court's efforts to level the playing field by allowing to introduce certain evidence bearing on Epstein's criminal history, his non-prosecution agreement with the government, settlements with three clients and the existence and settlement of other civil claims against Epstein, this Court must allow the Jury to review these 30 e-mails which would allow a full evaluation of\_' absurdly false anxiety damages claim, his conduct and the true value of his clients' cases as known by Edwards. The e-mails reveal as a sham efforts to disprove Epstein's probable cause for believing unusual litigation tactics were designed for an improper purpose, and leave undisputed and intact the extrinsic evidence on which Epstein reasonably relied as probable cause for the original action.

ARGUMENT

A. The 30 E-mails are Relevant and Directly Controvert Sworn Testimony and Repeated Misrepresentations to this Court

The 30 e-mails are all undeniably relevant to this case. They eviscerate damages claim and directly controvert denials under oath and repeated representations before this Court regarding the weakness of clients' damages claims against Epstein, Me association and interaction with Rothstein and the litigation tactics in which improperly engaged, and they destroy the overall credibility of allegations against Epstein. These e-

mails are not only relevant and material, but make it impossible for to establish any damages at all or to satisfy his heavy burden to prove the absence of probable cause for Epstein to have filed suit against him.

claims that he has suffered and continues to suffer damages arising out of his "anxiety" from Epstein's Complaint that was filed more than eight years ago and dismissed six years ago because it: (a) falsely characterized\_' cases as "weak"; (b) indi Alga knew or should have known of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme; and (c) alleged s engaged in litigation conduct to support the Ponzi scheme. As support for this use ion, wards sets up as the central issues (and issue injection) in the trial of his Counterclai ai pstein: (a) the strength of his clients' cases against Epstein; (b) the lack of any i n etween Rothstein and either or\_' clients' cases against Epstein; legitimacy of litigation conduct in his clients' cases against Epstein.

Epstein is entitled to have the Court and jury consider these e-mails as the jury determines whether Epstein exceeded the wide latitude which the law confers on all plaintiffs "to use their best judgment in prosecuting ... a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for misconduct." tchevarria, McCalla, Raymer, & Frappier v. M, 950 So. 2d 380, 384 (Ha. 2007). !so crucial that these e-mails be available to the jury as they evaluate the factual is\$ that claims determine whether it was objectively reasonable or unreaso a to ly on the extrinsic evidence that Epstein proffers as probable cause.

B. No Binger "Surprise in Fact" and Truth and Justice Requires the Courtroom's Lieht

There is no Binger prejudice and truth and justice require admissibility of these 30 highly relevant, case-ending e-mails either authored or received by and undeniably within possession since 2009. Based on this, l= — an officer of the court, who took an oath to "never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact" - cannot claim "StIrprise."8

The decision before this Court is one of right and wrong, and as this Courthas acknowledged its task —"What is the right thing to do" which allows the Court to "I rt ihemitror at the end of the day," and respond to one question: "Did 1 do the right thing b those %the came before me..." — regardless of economic status or popularity of either Transcript, 88-89.) counsel. (11/2/18 Hearing wrongly placed, and h advanced, an "attorney-client" label on the 30 e-mails with the intent that Epsteks id never discover the existence of these devastatingly harmful documents, while at the same time allowing other adversaries access to these \\;{ so called "privileged" e-mails.

Importantly, the anome 1 is false because none of the 30 e-mails were to or from clients and none of the e-mail nt n confidential information provided bylM' three clients. Further, any information about ' clients' past was all publicly available (and generally known) and even testified about by those very clients. also knows that= Jaffe agreed to produce work-product e-mails in 2011 and, in fact, did so, including asserted work-product emails relating to three clients' cases. ' hollow attorney-client privilege and work product assertions are now squarely challenged and must be rejected in favor of the truth. See Loureiro v. State, 133 So. 3d 948, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013X"A trial must be a search for the truth.");

°Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar haps://webprodtloridabar.orgAvpcontent/uploads/2017/04/oath-of-admission-w-the-florida-bar-ada.odt

Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So. 3d 1060, 1063 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2011)("...jury can the search for truth and justice be accomplished").

Not only are the e-mails highly relevant and constitute no Binger "surprise in fact" to S as this Court has already glimpsed upon cursory review of the e-mails in March 2018, not a single one of the 30 e-mails are attorney-client privileged. Further, if any work product existed, it was either waived or is subject to a clear exception to such protection under the law. If this Court followS' lead, a ruling shielding the jury from case-eviscerating yflllMould result in reversible error and lead to a second trial.

Because these e-mails are case-ending or worse for has attacked Epstein's counsel and derided the truth of these e-mails in ptf ett o hide them from the light of the courtroom, but in the end, there it is: truth.

C. SI Expressly Waived Work Product Protection in 2011 and His Deceptive Concealment of the 30 E-Mails on a Len& Deficient Privilege Log Violated Florida JAM and Court Orders

expressly, and on, multiple occasions, waived work-product protections. In negotiating the preparation of the privilege log, on February 2, 2011, Jaffe informed Epstein's counsel and the Special IM that it would omit from the log any work product objections that related to closed cases:

AR work product materials will be turned over to Plaintiff except for materials related to new or ongoing cases AND on the condition that they be produced "For Attorneys' Eyes Only. (Exhibit 3.)

Gary, Jr. told the Special he would then only list on the new privilege log work product materials for ggagi cases and attorney-client privilege materials. Id. confirmed this agreement more than once:

(February 9, 2011] "We also have 2 more boxes that contain work product materials what we will turn over subject to the agreement that Plaintiff will

not assert any privilege has been waived by turning them over now, and further subject to the agreement that they be produced 'For Attorneys' Eyes Only.'" (Exhibit 4.)

[February 16, 2011] "Do you still want to do the attorney's eyes only? Do you want to speed it up or not? You'll eet work-product stuff if you agree to the attorney's-eyes only." Epstein's counsel confirmed their agreement. (Exhibit 5.)

This representation was significant. At the time made this representation to Epstein in 2011, the three cases had been litigating against Epstein while he was Rothstein's partner at Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA") were closed and had long been settled (in July 2010). Thus, based on representation, was obligated, as an officer of the Court, to have produced all e-mails reflecting work product pertaining to the three closed Epstein cases because they did not pertain to "new or ongoing cas e at the time of the production had other clients who had claims against Fstyin, se, too, have now long been settled9, and none of those claims remain pending ag

In fact, did produce mpsjban 31000 pages as "attorneys' eyes only" in February 2011 (including asserted work product rel 'rig to the cases of his three clients that intends to feature in the prosecution of his malicious prosecution claim against Epstein). Epstein has now discovered that did not produce select items, and specifically withheld inculpatory e-mails pertaining to his closed cases against Epstein, despite his partner's representation to counsel and the Court (Special Master). I° To the extent that the 30 e-mails identified for this Court relate to

settled hil l/Its' claims against Epstein in August 2011. n anticipation of response that some work-product documents relating to L.M. and E.W. were not produced because of some tangential privilege based on the pending Crimes Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA") action against the United States Governmen this lacks merit. None of the subject e-mails arc communications between the government and clients or their counsel or implicate any issues relevant to the CVRA case. Im rtantly, other than af it lotice of Change of Address in the CVRA action in April 2009 when joined RRA, did nothing in that action while he was at RRA. In fact, the first filing made in the CVRA action after April 2009

actual cases litigated against Epstein, they were closed cases. If work-product protection ever even arguably applied to them, the e-mails should have been turned over for review by Epstein's counsel pursuant to Jaffe's agreement. Moreover, because all oe clients' claims against Epstein have now settled, in reliance on M previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, there is simply no basis for them not to be subject to review by this Court and a determination that any work-product protection that may at one time have been available is no longer applicable as a result of a clear and irrefutable waiver. See J e4 . I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (I I th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former co se waived the workproduct privilege with respect to documents sought by Edwards' ien er having voluntarily sent allegedly privileged correspondence to the United Stated-4 lea negotiations).

Moreover, this Court's conclusion that Ed 4r of any protection is further mandated by his subsequent deliberate conc eal ' e oxof the e-mails in question on a 159-page privilege log that was determined by the Cu n y 7, 2012, to be legally deficient on its face and to have utterly failed to comply with the legal requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5) and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). (Exhibit 7.) It was through this device that prevented the e-mails from ever seeing the light of day despite M misrepresentations to Epstein's counsel that all e-mails qualifying as work product in closed cases against Epstein had been produced. While the e-mails remained concealed through la improper device, continued to prosecute his Counterclaim against Epstein based on the veryissues directly refuted by e-mails concealed from existence. M, who is

was in Se ember 2010 after the court administratively closed the case for inactivity — almost a year after left RRA. (See excerpt of CVRA Court Docket attached as Exhibit 6.)

both an officer of the court, a plaintiff and counsel of record for himself in this action, should not be rewarded for such unethical gamesmanship and violation of court rules.

On August 17, 2012, the Court vacated the May 7, 2012, Order, but did not relieveM of the requirement to provide a new fully compliant privilege log. In fact, the Court's August 17, 2012, Order provides, in pertinent part:

shall file a written response specifically addressing the production sought in Paragraph 13 of EPSTEIN's Motion to Compel and Amend Protective Order of March 9, 2012 as Ordered in this Court's April 10, 2012 Order. The response shall identify non-privileged responsive documents previously produced, shall be accompanied by--all nonprivileged responsive documents not previously produced if any and shall identify, in a proper privileee foe as referenced in this Court's May 7, 2012 Order, responsive documents withheld from production on the basis of any assertion of privilege. This response shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this Order.

(August 17, 2012, Order) (emphasis added) (Exhibit 8). Edwards failed to comply with the Court's Order and provide an accurate privilege log. His February 23, 2011 privilege log (Exhibit 9) is clearly invalid and the protections asserted thereunder must be deemed waived for any number of reasons, including failure to comply with the Court's Order.

Because blatantly disregarded the Court's Order, as well as the requirements of Florida's Rules of Civil Procedure and the TIG case, the February 23, 2011 privilege log remains wholly deficient and worse — deliberately misleading. The privilege log misstates objections, improperly identifies or altogether excludes the required identities of the document authors and recipie }tests document descriptions are deceptively vague and misrepresent the true nature of the documents listed on the privilege log. Had ever provided a legally sufficient privilege log, Epstein would have been afforded the opportunity to identify as early as February 23, 2011, the improper assertions of attorney-client privilege, work-product protection and irrelevancy made by with respect to the 30 e-mails.

In light of =I' promise to turn "work-product" e-mails over coupled with his deliberately misleading and non-compliant privilege log and multiple instances of waiver regarding work product from closed cases, the Court need not make any further determinations other than to unseal the 30 e-mails and allow Epstein to use them at trial. MI' deceptive privilege log and subsequent disregard for the Court's Order mandating ("shall") a proper privilege log should not be rewarded by this Court, and requires a finding that has waived any clairn of protection, particularly protection he has already waived or lost for a variety of other reasons discussed herein.

D. Waived Any Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection by Voluntary Disclosure to a Clear Adversary in the Razorback Litication,

Additional ly, ' counsel conceded on March 8, 2018, that the e-mails were shared with the Conrad, Scherer law firm counsel for Razorback. (Exhibit 2, 15:1-16; 18:18-19:3). (Also see April 2011 communication between ' counsel and Razorback's counsel, Composite Exhibit 10.) Clearly, Razorback sought their production to prove its allegations in the Razorback lawsuit that Rothstein used the three cases against Epstein, in part, to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. Once MEI provided'the documents that he claims are privileged in this case (both attorney-client and work product) to Conrad, Scherer, an adversarial party's counsel, I= waived those privileges. See § 90.507, Fla. Stat.; Delap v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242, 1247 (1983). See also Tucker v. State, 484 So. 2d 1299, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("The law is clear that once communications protected by the attorney-client privilege are voluntarily disclosed, the privilege is waive cannot be reclaimed.") (emphasis added).

Recognizing his voluntary disclosure to Razorback, has defended against Epstein's claim of waiver by arguing "selective waiver" or "common interest." claimed that "Conrad & Scherer . .. entered into a joint prosecution agreement with counsel, whereby both parties agreed to share information relative to their claims and/or defenses related to Scott

Rothstein without waiving privilege as to their communications or documents shared." Supp. Resp. to Epstein's Mot. to Declare Relevance, July 26, 2018, at 14. This is a claim of "selective waiver"—that may waive privilege as to one recipient while maintaining it as to others. However, every court that has recently addressed the logic and viability of "selective waiver" has concluded that it fails as inconsistent with the purpose of the attorney-client privilege. Permian Corp. v. U.S., 665 F.2d 1214, 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1981). In addition, "loJute a party has disclosed work product to an adversary, it waives the work product doctrine as to all other adversaries." McMorgan & Co. v. First CaL Mortg. Co., 931 F. Supp. 703 (ND. Cal. 1996).

Case law from across the country demonstrates that the confidentiality agreement is of no merit because a litigant who chooses to disclose information claimed as confidential cannot have his cake and eat it too. Simply put, actions speak louder than'words.

The general rule applies here. On March 8,2018,\_' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were shared with Epstein's counsel by Mr. Scherer, counsel for Razorback. Thus, admits that he voluntarily furnished the e-mails to Mr. Scherer. Razorback sought these allegedly privileged communications to prove its allegations in the Razorback litigation that Rothstein used\_' three cases against Epstein to lure investors into Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. When produced these documents to Mr. Scherer, who was prosecuting an action against Rothstein and the firm, waived his claim to attorney-client privilege and work-product protection as to the whole world. I See infra.

Likewise, no "common interest" protection exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly pot aliened with This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC-

&#x27;Unless osed the information relating to his clients without their consent, which is unfathomable, then permitted disclosure waives it on their behalf as well.

RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by

William Scherer, Razorback's counsel:

  • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the Epstein/LM litigation in order to lure \$13.5 million worth of my victims, my clients, into making investments in these phoney [sic] settlements." (17:7-14.)
  • "In addition, as we have alleged, that Mr. a and the firm put sensational allegations in the LM case that they knew were not true, in order to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.)
  • "I can't conceive that Mr.al and the predecessor &wfinh would have any standing to prepare privilege logs or anything else, given what I just told the Court. That would be like having the fox guard the hen house." (20:5-9.)
  • "[The Complaint] names Rothstein. It does not name Mr. . It just names Rothstein, not the firm, and lays out the facts and says other people in the firm. We did not name them because we want to see the documents and see whether they had involvement." (22:3-8.)
  • "I support the same position that (Epstein) has asked the Court, and that is to have the trustee deal with this, get these docume l with it with you, rather than allow the successor law firm (i.e., law firm) to have them." (22:19-24.)

(8/4/10 Hearing Transcript, Exhibit 11.)

It really is that simple. ' decision years ago (for whatever expedient or economic reason) to voluntarily give away the allegedly attorney-client privileged and work product e-mails to Conrad Scherer in the Razorback litigation triggered section 90.507. After taking steps inconsistent with the maintenance of privileges in confidential information, the privileges cannot be resurrected. They were waived.

E. Work-Product Protection Was Waived by a Issue Iniection

has also waived attorney-client and work-product protections in the 30 e-mails under Florida's "at issue" doctrine (also known as "issue injection"). Related to the "at issue" doctrine is the "implied waiver" doctrine.

The "at issue" doctrine requires that a court find a waiver of attorney-client privilege. Genovese v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 74 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. 2011) (noting that privilege is waived where, for example, advice of counsel is raised as a defense and privileged communication is necessary to establish the defense). Under the "at issue" doctrine, "[AJ party cannot hide behind the shield of privilege to prevent an opponent from effectively challenging pertinent evidence." Caries Const. Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co F. Supp. 3d 1259, 1273 n.40 (S.D. Ha. 2014) (emphasis added).

<C\ Here, the e-mails are vital and necessicc defend against one or more elements of a malicious prosecution claim. Among other things, the e-mails directly relate to the credibility oa claim for damages based on "anxiety" he has allegedly suffered every single day of his life since December 2009 when Epstein's lawsuit was filed, and continues to suffer through today. (, 11/1W17, 11:21-12:16; 21:14-22:8; 23:5-16)12 In addition, the e-mails directly debunk Edwards' assertion that he had no involvement with Rothstein, that he acted properly in the litigation and that there is nothing to demonstrate any weakness in a powsettled three clients' cases against Epstein. Repeatedly, through his own sworn testimony and repeated -misrepresentations before the Court, has made these central issues in his malicious prosecution Counterclaim against Epstein. own statements in the e-mails arc directly relevant and go to the heart of Epstein's ability to demonstrate that had no

12Excerpts of a November 10, 2017, deposition transcript are attached as Exhibit 12.

damages, that any damages from anxiety as claimed by cannot be blamed on the allegations in the Complaint, but are attributable to voluntary association with Rothstein and his own litigation activities in the Epstein cases, and that in the end,\_' claimed reasons that Epstein could not have had probable cause and acted with malice are plainly false. Therefore, they are critical to Epstein's defenses to malicious prosecution claim and any workproduct that may have applied to them must be deemed to have been waived.

F. The Crime-Fraud Exception Applies to Some E-mails

Under Florida law, there is no attorney-client privilege when the services of a lawyer are sought to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud. § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. R. Profl Conduct 41.6 ("A lawyer must reveal confidential information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary . . . to prevent a client from committing a crime."). Following earlier ptecedent in Parrott v. Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262, 1271 (11th Cir. 1983), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the part of the district court's order determining that the crime-fraud exception may be applied because an attorney's illegal or fraudulent conduct may, alone, overcome attorney-work-product protection. See Drummond Co., Inc. v. Conrad Scherer, LLP, No. 2:11-cv-03695411DP-TMP (11th Cir. March 23, 2018), at 23-24. (Exhibit 13.)

As further support-for this crime-fraud argument and Rothstein's and working together as alleged in Epstein's Complaint, Epstein directs the Court to his Memorandum filed under seal and the illustrative sampling of exhibits. This is more specifically explained in Epstein's Confidential Memorandum.

G. No Attorney-Client Privilege Exists

Jaffe, and now M, misleadingly and repeatedly have advanced the "attorneyclient privilege" label again and again in the hope that this Court will turn away and preclude the documents from jury consideration. Of the 1,607 claimed privilege items on Jaffe's privilege log, 938 entries were labeled as "irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence," while 994 entries were labeled as "work product and attorneyclient privilege" (only 19 were communications with a client as determin description in the privilege log).

Despite and Paul Cassell's (counsel for the e protestations to the contrary, this Court can plainly see that not a single one of the 30 e-mails are attorney-client privileged communications between (or any other co-counsel) and and Mr. Cassell's three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Rather, the majority of the documents are emails among attorneys and staff within RRA, with Mr. Cassell, and with media sources and do not qualify for that protection as codified in section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. A quick read of the 30 e-mails makes it easy to understand both that the e-mails do not in any way reflect attorneyclient communications and that and Mr. Cassell have very significant personal and professional reasons that they do not want the e-mails to see the light of the courtroom. See Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Lcnv Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 223, 119 S. Ct. 636, 657, 142 L. Ed. 2d 599 (1999)("`Stinlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.'" --; citing Buckley v. Valeo, supra, at 67, and n. 80, 96 S.Ct. 612 (quoting L. Brandeis, Other People's Money 62 (1933)).

Under Florida's Evidence Code, "[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such

other person learned of the communications because they were made in the rendition of legal services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). A communication between lawyer and client is "confidential" if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than:

  • 1. Those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client.
  • 2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.

Las Olas River House Condo. ASSIII, Inc. v. Lorh, LLC, 181 So. 3d 556, 557-58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); § 90.502(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017); Witte v. Witte, 126 So. 3d '1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)(second exception applies to agents of the client such as a family member on behalf of an incapacitated relative). Not one of the 30 e-mails provides any basis to conclude that the documents constitute or reflect attorney-client communications in ltie rendition of legal services to a client. This Court's in camera review of the 30 e-mails will easily confirm that no attorney-client privilege applies.

CONCLUSION

an officer of the court, the plaintiff in this case and counsel of record for himself, can claim no surprise for e-mails he authored, received or possessed since 2009 and deliberately and improperly concealed from disclosure to Epstein since February 2011. The 30 e-mails are relevant, directly controverting sworn testimony and repeated misrepresentations before this Court, and clearly none of them are attorney-client communications. Additionally, h right to assert attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine with respect to the 30 fails for all reasons set forth above. This Court is equipped with the controlling law and equitable principles to perform the now substantially narrowed request for an in camera review of the sealed 30 e-mails, and to confirm the critically relevant nature and admissibility of these e-mails based on the absence or waiver of any attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. The in

camera review will confirm that expressly waived all privilege in February 2011 and such documents should be deemed to have been produced by him. As directed by this Court, a memorandum outlining Epstein's positions with respect to the specific e-mails that are the subject of this Motion is being provided to this Court separately under seal for its consideration.

WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, moves for this Court for an iin camera review of the 30 e-mails, with counsel present to be heard, and for a ruling that n in exists, or that waiver or other reasons preclude any potential protection and t1Je9 aails may be identified by Epstein on his Exhibit List and introduced at trial.

(1..) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICZ --=

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 9, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

+6s

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA ( 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+

J. [REDACTED]
+ J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+nis@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+

J. [REDACTED]

+
+

Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

+

J. [REDACTED]

+		 +

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ 1075 Broken Sound Parkway N.W., Suite 102
+ Boca Raton, FL 33487-3541
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

+

Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jay@jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe

+

EXHIBITS

Ex.DateDescription
110/29/18In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S. Bankruptcy
203/08/18Afternoon Hearin Transcri t Exce t . 15 18 19 59 61
302/02/11E-mail from Gary to Robert Carney, Jack Scarola,
Seth Lehrman, Lilly Ackerman and Brad
402/09/11E-mail from G
Jack Scarola, Knight,
502/16/11Hearing Transcript Excerpt, p. 41
6N/AJane Doe v. United States, U.S. District Court, Southern
705/07/12Order on Jeffrey E stein's Motion to Compel Production of
Documents from and for Sanctions
808/17/12Order on Outstanding Discovery Motions
902/23/11Jaffe's Privilege Log
1004/08/11
1108/04/10In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., U.S. Bankruptcy
\_Hearini:. Transcri et
1211/10/17J. Deposition Transcript Excerpts, pp. 11-
1303/23/18Drummond Company, Inc. v. Conrad & Scherer, UP, United

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11

Debtor.

SCOTT J. LINK'S SWORN DECLARATION OF FACT

  • 1. My name is Scott Jeffrey Link and I am a founding partner of the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, PA. I have been a member of the Florida Bar since 1986 and I have been a Board Certified Specialist in Business Litigation by the Florida Bar since 1999. I currently represent Jeffre E stein, the Plaintiff
    • M. au and Counter-Defendant in the lawsuit styled Epstein
    • v. Rothstein, and L. , No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG pending before the Fifteenth Judicial ircuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida (the "state court proceeding"), and in these show cause proceedings.
  • 2. In November 2017, Epstein retained Link & Rockenbach to represent him in the state court proceeding. As part of my due diligence in represen E stein I learned that one of the firms that represented him, through May 2012, was Burnett, P.A. ' a ). My law firm contacted Epstein's former attorneys, inc uding review their files.
  • 3. When Link & Rockenbach appeared in the state court proceedin the only documents it had received were from Epstein's immediate former counsel (not This set of documents contained a subset of documents produced on May 7, Illicontained . 89 documents (163 pages), 84 of which were identified on III Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.'s se(n.Jaffe") February 2 , privilege log. The May 7, 2012 production had been 1.1 e state court proceeding, including as evidence in summary judgment filings. I also learned that there had been testimony in the state court pkeeeeding by Epstein's opponent, la stating that he had reviewed 26,000 pages of e-mails and produced them to pstem. files associated with the state court proceedniire, I observed approximately thirty-six
  • 4. On January 10, 2018, I traveled to office in Miami, Florida, to review its boxes of files related to the case. However, representatives of informed me that was not willing to release its boxes. There ore, wi e assistance of my paralegal, Tina EM, I flagged items for to reproduce and provide to my finn.

  • 5. A compact disc ("CD") labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" was in one of the boxes. This CD was flagged for reproduction, but not reviewed at that time.
  • 6. On February 1, 2018, Link & Rockenbach received three boxes from containing copies of the items flagged for reproduction.
  • 7. On February 25, 2018, Link & Rockenbach begs to the CD. The CD contained 27,542 pages of e-mails that were consecutively stamped and had no confidential, privilege or watermark designations. There was also no prefix indicating whaproduced the documents.
  • 8. Link & Rockenbach reviewed approximately 5,000 pages of the 27 0es contained on the CD.
  • 9. From the approximately 5,000 pages reviewed, I distilled the levant and material items to Epstein's defense to numerous e-mails. Upon discove of vidence I decided to prepare an Appendix in Support of Epstein's Respons 0 osition to Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and a newly disclosed trial exhibit list. "sic 2
  • 10. Before filing the Appendix, Epstein's cu'd- la ers reviewed the state court's and bankruptcy court's files for Confidentiality Stipulations or Orders, searched former counsels' records, spoke with former counsel from M, and asked counsel (David Vitale), if he was aware of any confidentiality orders that would govern the use of exhibits at trial. I found rt.fetence to confidentiality discussions in 2011 relating to how documents would be produceckbulno Confidentiality Agreement was in effect. While I recognized that some documegiwere listed on a Farmer Jaffe's privilege log, the documents we already had in out/possession and were used in summary judgment filings were also listed on the privilege log. As such, I did not believe we were in possession of any documents that had not been produced in the case. Moreover, the numbe es on the CD (27,542), approximately corresponded with the number of pages that had testified weFe produced (26,000).
  • 11. With that Appendix, I filed an illustrative g of e-mails obtained from the CD, and provided the documents, and others, to .counsel as supplemental trial exhibit production.
  • 12. On Sunday, March 4, 2018, counsel wrote to me via e-mail and claimed that I had obtained all 27,542 pages of e-mails improperly and unethically, and requested that Link & Rockenbach immediately destroy all such e-mails in its possession and remove them from the Court docket.
  • 13. At this point, because whether I had complied with my ethical obligations as an attorney had been called into question, my law firm engaged a former ethics director of the Florida Bar, Timothy Chinaris, to review the circumstances under which Link & Rockenbach discovered the CD and its contents, and its subsequent actions. Mr. Chinaris opined that

the documents (CD) in question were not wrongfully obtained or retained by Link & Rockenbach, that Link & Rockenbach did nothing wrong, and acted in an ethical and proper manner in bringing the matter to the state court's attention. A copy of Mr. Chinaris' Affidavit is attached as Exhibit A.

  • 14. I attended a hearing in the state court proceeding before The Honorable Donald W. Hafele =obtained or retained the CD, Link & Rockenbach's receipt of the documents,' on March 8, 2018, involving these issues, including the circumstances in which CD, Epstein's ability to use the materials in the state court proceeding moving forward and whether further confidentiality measures were needed. Judge Hafele commented' that the state court found no fault with Link & Rockenbach in terms of how it obtained the CD, or in any other action taken by Link & Rockenbach in furtherance of its defensikof Epstein.
  • 15. Moreover, Judge Hafele ordered that all counsel who represent Epstein are subject to directives of the state court concernin confidentiality, sealing and non-dissemination of materials derived from the CD that claims are privileged. Specifically, Judge Hafele instructed Link & Rockenbach not to er disseminate any documents contained on the CD that claims are privileged, to file the CD under seal and to file the stricken exhibits m e CD under seal. I have complied with those directions from Judge Hafele.
  • 16. I have not made any further dissemination of the documents, including those identified on the Appendix which had been filed in the state. roceediSie disclosed trial exhibits, or any other documents from the CD that Jaffe, and the Intervenors asserted a privilege over.
  • 17. On March 6, 2018, on behalf of Epstein, I did not object to the Intervenors' Motion to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Documents Shall be Treated filed in the state court proceeding.
  • 18. On March 10, 11 and;12,-2018, I worked diligently withal' counsel, the duty judge, and later, Judge Hafele, to ultimately obtain an order se mg the two docket entries which had been open to the public for over 48 hours.
  • 19. Link & Rockenbach destroyed its paper copy of the Redacted Appendix that was filed in the state court proceeding and deleted the electronic version of it from its system.
  • 20. Link & Rockenbach placed the Unredacted Appendix that had been served, but not filed, in a sealed box that has been maintained in its West Palm Beach office, unopened, for appellate purposes.
  • 21. Link & Rockenbach placed an exhibit sticker on the trial exhibits that were newly disclosed on Epstein's March 5, 2018 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List which were printed from the CD and placed them in a sealed envelopes. On March 21, 2018, Link 8c Rockenbach, on Epstein's behalf, moved to make the records confidential. On April 6, 2018, the state court entered an Agreed Order Directing Clerk to Seal Filings and those records have now been filed

under seal. Link & Rockenbach retained a duplicate set of the exhibits in a sealed envelope in a sealed box maintained in its offices for appellate purposes.

  • 22. Link & Rockenb maintain it with further rulings by the state court. original CD in a sealed envelope and will original records at Link & Rockenbach's offices until
  • 23. Excepting the items identified above which are maintained in a sealed bo , Link & Rockenbach has destrosl all hard copies of the documents it had reproduced the CD obtained from
  • 24. Link & Rockenbach deleted the electronic duplicate of the CD and the electronic version of the alleged privileged exhibits from Dropbox, the online service by which those documents were transmitted to counsel of record. Link & Rockenbach alsO began deleting saved electronic documents from its computer system, and a to work with IT personnel to remove copies of any documents in which- wand the Intervenors claimed a rivile ed from its e-mail servers. However, in an abundance of caution, and in light of and the Intervenors' objections t the deletion of electronic documents, Link & Rockenbach has not taken further steps actronic documents.
  • 25. Epstein believes that waived any privilege laims over the entire CD asked the state court judge to conduct an in camera review of the 47 exhibits claims are privileged and make a determination on relevance, privilege and waiver. Those issues are currently set for hearing the state court proceeding on Augu 2 3,2018.

Executed in West Palm Beach, Flo the foregoing is true and correct. ust /Li 2018. I declare un perjury that

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff

C( ) 44

AFFIDAVIT OF Tfftelk4HINARIS A

BEFORE ME personally appeared TIMOTHY P. ANARIS, affiant, and, being duly sworn, did say and aver the following:

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS

  • 1. My name is Timothy P. Chinaris.
  • 2. I am a resident &the State of Tennessee, residing in Nolensville, Tennessee.
  • 3. 1 am an attorney licensed in the State of Florida and a member in good standing of The Florida
  • 4. My professional qualifications and experience are set forth in my curriculum vitae, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The contents of said curriculum vitae are true and accurate.
  • 5. I was employed by The Florida Bar in Tallahassee, Florida from August 1986 to April 1997. From 1986 to 1989, my position was Assistant Ethics Counsel. From December 1989 to April 1997, I was Ethics Director of The Florida Bar.
  • 6. As Ethics Director, I was responsible for operation of The Florida Bar's Ethics Department. The Ethics Department employs licensed Florida attorneys whose duties include providing oral and

written advisory opinions to practicing Florida Bar members on ethics-related topics. The Ethics Department annually renders thousands of ethics and advertising opinions to Florida lawyers.

  • 7. As Ethics Director of The Florida Bar, my responsibilities included: hiring, training, and supervising the Ethics Department's attorneys; providing oral and written advisory ethics opinions to practicing attorneys; advising The Florida Bar Board of Governors on issues of professional ethics; serving as counsel to ethics-related Florida Bar committees; consulting with attorneys in The Florida Bar's Lawyer Regulation Department, Unlicensed Practice of Law Department, and Center for Professionalism regarding cases, advisory opinions, and programs; speaking to local, State, and national groups on matters of legal ethics; and writing about professional responsibility-maneis for various publications.
  • 8. During my employment with The Florida Bar, I personally render ds of advisory ethics opinions to practicing Florida attorneys on a wide variety of mat rs co ing legal ethics ad professional responsibility.
  • 9. From April 1997 to September 2000, I was employed bycloll iAda Coastal School of Law in Jacksonville, Florida as Associate Professor of Law and Associate for Information Resources and Technology. My duties included teaching courses in legal ethics.
  • 10. From September 2000 to June 2005 1 was employed by Grundy, Virginia as Associate Professor of Law and Assistant of Information Resources. My iiilachian School of Law in duties included teaching courses in legal ethics.
  • 11. From June 2005 through March 2014 I was employed by Faulkner University's =School of Law in Alabama, as Professor of Law. My duties included teaching courses in legal ethics, as well as ok\_idui: administrative positions (Associate for Academic Affairs from 2011 to 2014; Associate MI for Information Resources from 200 to 012).
  • 12. Since April 2014 I have been employed b Belmont University College of Law in Nashville, Tennessee, as Professor of Law and Associate for Academic Affairs. My duties include teaching courses ialegal ethics, as well as administering the law school's academic program.
  • 13. During my employment as Florida Bar Ethics Director or since leaving the Bar's employ, I have: advised lawyers on issues relating to various aspects of legal ethics, including confidentiality and duties regarding receipt of potentially confidential documents; advised lawyers and others on unlicensed practice of law issues; advised lawyers on legal malpractice issues; represented lawyers in various professional responsibility matters, including Florida Bar disciplinary cases; and consulted and testified as an expert on various legal ethics and professional responsibility issues, including in Florida Bar disciplinary cases.
  • 14. I am a member of the Professional Ethics Committee of The Florida Bar, having served on that Committee limn 1997 to 2003, flow 2006 to 2012, and from 2017-present. I chaired the Professional Ethics Committee from 2002 to 2003. I am a member of the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Professionalism, and chaired that Committee from 2016-2017. I have twice served

as President of The Florida Bar Out of State Division. I previously served as Vice-chair of The Florida Bar Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law, and as a member of The Florida Bar Special Committee to Review the ABA Model Rules 2002, The Florida Bar Vision 2016 Commission and The Florida Bar Attorney-Client Privilege Task Force. I am or have been a member of state bar rules or unauthorized practice of law committees in Alabama and Virginia.

15. I regularly write and speak on legal ethics topics. I developed and maintain the legal ethics website "sunEthics.com" (http://www.sunethics.com). I co-authored the treatise Florida Legal Malpractice and Attorney Ethics.

- \ 16. I have consulted and testified in state and federal court matters, arbitration Proceedings, and Florida Bar disciplinary matters as an expert witness on a variety of professional 'responsibility issues, including confidentiality and and duties regarding receipt of potentially confidential documents, conflicts of interest, disqualification, attorney's fees, legal nialpractioe; and unauthorized practice of law.

17. I consult with and represent practicing attorneys and othets regarding issues of professional responsibility and legal ethics.

MATERIALS REVIEWED/

18. In connection with this matter, I have spoken to Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach of Link & Rockenbach, P.A., counsel for Mr. Epstein in this matter, and reviewed documents provided to me by the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, PA., including but not limited to: Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special with attachments ("Motion for Court to Declare"); and Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul Cassell, on Behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How e Documents Shall Be Treated ("Notice of No Objection"). Additionally, I have reviewed relevant Rules of Professional Conduct and ethics opinions.

OPERATIVE FACTS

19. Paragrapkhs 20. through 28. summarize the operative facts, as I understand them, that 1 have considered in forming my opinions.

20. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein has been represented by various counsel in the course of this case. Mr. Epstein's current counsel, Link & Rockenbach, P.A., appeared in this case on November I, 2017.

21. In the course of its fre-nration,\_Link CentaCiedli3Siehi'spriar counsel, Burnett, P.A. (' ='), and requested file materials relating to this case. ■ had 36 file boxes on this case at its Miami office. was not willing to

release the boxes and, accordingly, Link & Rockenbach, through Scott Link and paralegal Tina SIMI flagged items to be copied. Included within the 36 boxes was a disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp," which Link & Rockenbach flagged for copying.

22. Around February 1, 2018, Link & Rockenbach received 3 boxes from which contained the items that had been flagged for copying. Link & Rockenbach's pare e a assigned to the case, Tina ME was on vacation when the boxes arrived. When returned to the office on February 12, 2018, she started reviewing the materials. Mr. Li an s, ockenbach did not begin reviewing the documents on the disc marked "Epstein Bate Stamp" until the week of February 26, 2018.

23. The "Epstein Bate Stamp" disc contains more than 27,000 stamped pages, with no confidentiality designations. There was no cover letter or other designatigp con identiality. Some of the documents had been marked as exhibits.

24. Approximately 25,000-26,000 documents were produced . wards to Mr. Epstein as non-privileged documents. Mr. testified regarding producti at his deposition in 2013, stating that the documents had been turned over. Mr. Link and Ms. ROckenbach reasonably believed that testimony related to the documents on the/Epstein Bate Stamp" disc.

' 25. Mr. also produced documents to the Conrad & Scherer law firm in other litigation (Razorback), which Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach reasonably believed were produced without a claim of confidentiality.

26. Upon reviewing documents on the "Epstein Bate Stamp" disc, it appeared to Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach that some of those,documents contained information that is extremely relevant to issues in this case and may contradict tPstipttony and positions taken in the case by the opposing PAY.

27. Before filing the Motion for Court to Declare, Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach reviewed the court files in this case and in the bankruptcy proceeding involving the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler firm, asked Mr. counsel whether there were any confidentiality orders concerning trial exhibits, reviewed Mr. testimony regarding document production, asked general counsel for copies of any relevant confidentiality orders or stipulations, spoke wit attorneys, and reviewed the 36 boxes a second time.

28. When filing the Motion for Court to Declare, the identities of potentially sensitive individuals who are represented by attorney Paul Cassell were redacted. Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have filed the Notice of No Objection to show that they will not object if Mr. Cassell seeks to have the court seal this portion of the file.

MY OPINIONS IN THIS MATTER

29. As described more fully below, it is my opinion that Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have acted in an ethically proper manner in this case regarding the documents in question.

30. It is my opinion that the documents in question were not inadvertently provided to or wrongfully obtained by Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach.

a. The documents were on a disc labeled "Epstein Bate Stamp" that was obtained in the ordinary course of trial preparation by Link & Rockenbach from their client's prior counsel, the respected firm of [REDACTED].

b. It reasonably appeared to Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach that these documents had been produced to prior counsel and were not the subject of a confidentiality agreement or order.

c. For purposes of a lawyer's ethical obligations, a document is inadvertently provided "when it is accidentally transmitted, such as when an e-mail or letter is misaddressed or a document or electronically stored information is accidentally included with information that was intentionally transmitted." Comment, Rule 4-4.4, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Under the circumstances, nothing reasonably suggested to Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach that the documents were inadvertently provided or that they had been wrongfully obtained.

31. It is my opinion that Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach acted in an ethically proper manner by bringing the documents in question to the court's attention.

a. Even if the documents had been obtained as a result of inadvertence (which, in my opinion, is not the situation here), the ethical obligation of the recipient lawyers would be a limited one: to bring the matter to the attention of opposing counsel. See Rule 4-4.(b), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar; Florida Ethics Opinion 93-3. Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have done that. A similar, limited response by recipient lawyers is required when they obtain documents that have wrongfully come into a client's possession (which, in my opinion, is not the situation here). See Florida Ethics Opinion 07-1.

b. Further, even in inadvertent disclosure situations, a lawyer who believes that any privilege relating to the documents has been waived or is otherwise inapplicable acts in an ethically appropriate manner by seeking direction from the court on those questions. See Comment, Rule 4-4.4, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar ("Whether the lawyer is required to take additional steps, such as returning the document or electronically stored information, is a matter of law beyond the scope of these rules, as is the question of whether the privileged status of a document or electronically stored information has been waived."). That is what Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have done.

c. Finally, lawyers for all parties have an ethical obligation not to knowingly use or permit the use of improper testimony or other evidence in a court proceeding. See Rule 4-3.3, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. By bringing this matter to the court's attention, Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach have shown proper respect for the court and for the principles underlying Rule 4-3.3.

Further affiant sayeth not.

TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS

STATE OF TENNESSEE

COUNTY OF DAVIDSON

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7th day of March 2018 by TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS, who is personally known to me or who has produced valid identification and who did take an oath.

Commission Expires : 11/5/18

NOTA CERTIFIED

TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS

Post Office Box 120186 Nashville, Tennessee 37212 (615)460.8264

EDUCATION

M.S. in Library and Information Studies, Florida State University, 1996

J.D. With Honors, University of Texas at Austin, 1984

B.S. Cum Laude in Business Administration, Florida State University,

EMPLOYMENT Ac

Associate for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law (2014-Present),

Belmont University Coll.' Law Nashville, Tennessee

Assist law school with administration of academic program, including: planning and scheduling course offerings; making teaching assignments; hiring adjunct instructors; overseeing exam administration and grade reporting; administering academic counseling, dismissals, faculty orientation; and preparing tistics for and submissions to accrediting organizations. Additional responsibilities include teaching (legal ethics, insurance law, other subjects), committee service, publishing, and speaking.

Associate for Academic Affairs (2011-2014) and Professor of Law (2005-2014),

Faulkner University, School of Law Alabama

Assisted law school with administration o academic program. Taught courses in legal ethics, insurance law, and antitrust law.

Associate for Information Resources (2005-2012) and Professor of Law (2005-2014),

Faulkner University, School of Law 11.. Alabama

Directed law school information resources operations. Taught courses in legal ethics and other subjects.

Assistant of Information Resources and Associate Professor of Law,

Appalachian School of Law Grundy, Virginia 2000-2005

Directed law school library and information resources operations. Taught courses in legal ethics, criminal procedure, law office practice, and legal process. Faculty responsibilities included chairing and serving on various committees.

Associate Information Resources and Technology and Associate Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law Jacksonville, Florida 1998-2000

Directed all law school computing, instructional technology, telecommunications, and library operations. Taught courses in legal ethics. Faculty responsibilities included committee service and advising the school's law review.

Director of Library and Technology Center and Assistant Professor of Law,

Florida Coastal School of Law Jacksonville, Florida 1997-1998 Directed library operations. Taught courses in legal ethics.

Ethics Director, The Florida Bar Tallahassee, Florida 1989-1997

Director of program that provided advisory opinions to Florida lawyers o e 'cs and advertising issues. Duties included: hiring, training, and supervising staff a rneys; speaking to local, state, and national groups on professional responsibility issues; advising the Bar's Board of Governors and Bar committees; and writing for legal publications.

Assistant Ethics Counsel, The Florida Bar Tallahassee, Florida 1986-1989

Duties included providing written and oral advisory opinions to Florida lawyers on legal ethics, professional responsibility, and lawyer advertising issues, speaking to various groups, and writing articles on professional responsibility topics. /

Godwin & Carlton, P.C. Dallas, Texas 1986

Associate in commercial litigation section of civil practice law firm.

Texas Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas 1985

Research Attorney for Justices Annette Stewart and Ted M. Akin, Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals. The 13-justice court was the largest appellate court in Texas.

Texas Court of Appeals Dallas, Te;at 1984

Briefing Attorney for Justice Ted M. Akin, Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals.

Unisys Corporation Tallahassee, Florida and Dallas, Texas 1978-81

Branch Financial Manager for worldwide computer equipment and software company.

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS

r===1\ Authorbf legal ethics web site "sunEthics.com" (www.sunethics.com).

FLORIDA LEGAL ETHICS (West Academic Publishing, forthcoming 2020) (with Robert Jarvis).

FLORIDA LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND ATTORNEY ETHICS (American Legal Media, 2017) (with Trazenfeld and Robert Jarvis).

We Are Who We Admit: The Need to Harmonize Law School Admission and Professionalism Processes with Bar Admission Standards, 31 MISSISSIPPI COI LEOE LAW REVIEW 43 (2012).

"New Directions in Professionalism," report prepared for the Florida Bar Center for Professionalism, August 2009.

FLORIDA ETHICS GUIDE FOR LEGAL ASSISTANTS AND ATTORNEYS WHO UTILIZE LEGAL ASSISTANTS (4th ed., Fla. Bar Continuing Legal Education, 2006).

Even Judges Don't Know Everything: A Call for a Presumption of Admissibility for EXiiert Witness Testimony in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings, 36 ST. MARY'S LAW JOURNAL 825\_(2060,

\ More Than the Camel's Nose: The Sarbanes.. Act as Bad News for Ltt ients, and the Public, 31 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY Law REVIEW 359 (2005).

Chapter on "Ethics, Professionalism, and Discovery" in VIRGINIA DISr yER19, primarily authored by Jeffrey Kinsler (West Publishing 2005).

Primary drafter, Florida Bar lawyer advertising rules (1999 is

Florida Professional Responsibility in 1999: The Rule?oLth\$9ame, 24 NOVA LAW REVIEW 199 (Fall 1999), co-authored with Elizabeth Clark Tar

Professional Responsibility: 1998 Survey of v, 23 NOVA LAW REVIEW 161 (Fall 1998), co-authored with Elizabeth Clark Talbert.

The Ethics of Ethics Consultation: The 11ed Lawyer's Perspective, THE PROFESSIONAL LAWYER, 1997 Symposium Issue.

Florida Professional Responsibility Law in 1997, 22 NOVA LAW REVIEW 215 (Fall 1997), coauthored with Elizabeth Clark terbert.

Professional Responsibi .996 Survey of Florida Law, 21 NOVA LAW REVIEW 231 (Fall 1996).

Professional R 1995). ibility in Florida: The Year in Review, 1995, 20 NOVA LAW REVIEW 223 (Fall

"Ertl' Marc High-Impact Teaching of Legal Ethics," featured on the front page of law.com,

Answers to Frequently-Asked Ethics Questions, 65 FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL 49 (January 1991).

Contributing Author, FLORIDA LEGAL ETHICS (1992), and periodic supplements.

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

Admitted to Practice Law in Texas (1984), Florida (1986), Alabama (2009), and Tennessee (2014)

Admitted to the Bar of the United States Supreme Court (2011)

Admitted to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (2016)

Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee (1997-2003; 2006-12; 2017-Present) (Chair, 2002-2003)

Florida Bar Committee on Professionalism (1999-2000; 2013-Present) (Chair, 2016-201

Florida Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism (2016-2017)

Special Consultant to Florida Bar Center for Professionalism (2008-2009) AO

Trustee, Florida Supreme Court Historical Society (2013-Present) (Exec. Comm., 2014-Present)

Florida Bar Out of State Division Exec. Council (2005-Present) (President, 2007-08 & 2014-15)

Florida Bar Vision 2016 Commission (2013-2016)

Florida Bar Law Office Mgmt. Assistance Service Adv. Bd. (200772013) (Chair, 2011-2013)

Florida Bar Attorney-Client Privilege Task Force (2006-2009) (their, Ethics Subcommittee)

Florida Bar Special Committee on Website Advertising Rules (2005-2007)

Florida Bar Special Committee to Review ABA Ethics 2000 Model Rules (2002-2005)

Florida Bar Unlicensed Practice of Law Committee (2003-2006) (Vice-chair, 2005-2006)

Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education Committee (2002-2003; 2006-2009; 2016-Present)

Florida Bar Prepaid Legal Services CommitteA2004-2007)

\\- Florida Bar Law Related Education CO"111!tee : (2001-2004)

Tennessee Bar Assn. Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee (2014-Present)

Tennessee Bar Assn. General P tice, Solo, and Small Firm Section Exec. Council (2017-Present)

Tennessee Bar Assn. Attorne ell-peing Committee (2017-Present)

Commissioner, State ofAlabama thics Commission (2013-2014)

Alabama State Bar Unautbottted Practice of Law Committee (2007-Present)

Alabama State Bar Lawyer Referral Board of Trustees Committee (2017-Present)

Alabama State Bar Non-resident Members Section (Chair, 2016-17; Exec. Council, 2016-Present)

Alabama State Bar Non-resident Lawyers Task Force (Chair, 2015-2016)

Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Rules and Enforcement Committee (2011-2014) (Chair, 2013-14)

VirginikState Bar Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee (2003-2005)

Virginia State Bar Multi-Jurisdictional Practice of Law Task Force (2004-2005)

Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (1991-Present)

ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS

Presented 'The Path to Lawyer Well-Being and its Ethical Implications" at the Belmont University College of Law Seminar in Nashville, Tennessee, in December 2017.

Spoke on "New Issues in Lawyer Advertising and Marketing" at the ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility in Memphis, Tennessee in June 2011.

Presented "New Directions in Professionalism" to the Florida Bar Supreme Court Comntission on Professionalism at Tallahassee, Florida in November 2009.

Presented 'Pioneering with Professionalism: The Journey Begins with Ethics" a61ieThl Annual Meeting of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) in St. Louis, Missouri in July 2006. Spoke on "Leal and the Votin Ri ht Act of 1965" at a symposiunt sponaored by Faulkner University, School of Law, , Alabama in Septemb

Presented "Professionalism Begins with Ethics" at the Annual Association of Law Libraries (SEAALL) inella, Al g oYQie Southeastern April 2005.

Spoke on "Lawyer Advertising: Positive or Negative?'mat Pilje4ille, Kentucky College Conference on Ethics in April 2005.

Presented 'The Sarbanesil. as Bad News fg v s, Clients, and the Public" at the Ohio Northern University Law Review Symposiu n A hio in March 2005.

Presented "The Use of Expert Witness Testimony in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings" at the St. Mary's University College of Law Symposium on Legal Malpractice and Professional Responsibility in San Antonio, Texasirt February 2005.

Spoke on "The Attorney Disciplineprocess: Is It Working and Does It Shape Public Opinion Regarding Lawyers?" at the Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) Annual Meeting at Kiawah Island, South Catalina in August 2004.

As keynote speaker, presented "Does an Anormative Approach to Legal Ethics Really Serve the Public?" at the Pikeville, Kentucky College Conference on Ethics in Criminal Justice in April 2004.

Presented "Ethics and Professionalism in Today's Libraries" at the Virginia Library Association (VLA)\_Ahnual Meeting in Hot Springs, Virginia in November 2003.

Presented "Ethics and Professionalism in Law Libraries" at the Annual Meeting of the Virginia Association of Law Libraries (VALL) in Richmond, Virginia in November 2002.

Spoke on "Law Librarians and the Unauthorized Practice of Law" at the Southeastern Association of Law Librarians (SEAALL) Annual Meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida in April 2002.

Co-presenter with John Berry, Chair of the ABA Professionalism Commission, on "The Future of the Legal Profession," at Appalachian School of Law in November 2000.

Spoke on "The Ethics of Ethics Consultation" at the 1997 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility in Naples, Florida.

At the invitation of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, addressed the 1996 Kentucky Bar Association Annual Convention on "Lawyer Advertising Law and Regulation."

Addressed the 1994 ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility on "Opera 'ng a State Bar Ethics Opinion and Information Service."

Spoke on "Nonlawyer Involvement in the Practice of Law" at the 1989 ABA 0 Al' g yConference on Professional Responsibility in Chicago, Illinois.

OTHER PRESENTATIONS

Presented "Ethics in An Age of Technology" to the Jac Jpsrtice Association in December 2017.

Presented "Other People's Money: Properly Ha the Plaintiff's Practice," to the Jacksonville Justice Association in February

Presented "Marching in Formation: Honda Legal thics Developments" at the Military Affairs Symposium in Orlando, Florida, in Jane 20.I6

\ Presented "What's New in Florida Ethics" at the Florida Bar Out of State Division Seminar in New Orleans, Louisiana, in March 2,016.

Presented "Electronic Ethles: Staying Compliant in the Digital Age" at the Belmont University College Law Ethics Sernitiar in Nashville, Tennessee, in December 2015.

Spoke on "Ethics for Health Care Lawyers" at the Tennessee Bar Association Health Law Section Annual Seminar in Cool Springs, Tennessee, in October 2015.

Presented !Ethics and the Municipal Practice," at the Tennessee Municipal Attorneys Association Seminar in Nashville, Tennessee, in June 2015.

Presented "What's New in Florida Legal Ethics?" at Florida Bar General Practice Section Annual Ethics Update in Tampa, Florida in October 2014.

Presented "Florida Ethics Law Update" at Florida Bar Annual Meetings from 2006 through 2014.

Spoke to the Inn of Court in Tampa, Florida, in March 2014.

Presented "Ethics for Everyone: Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls" at the 2012 Faulkner Law Alumni Seminar in , Alabama in May 2012.

Spoke on "Ethics Essentials" at then -ABA Course of Study, "Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation," in Coral Gables, Florida in February 2011.

Presented "Ethics Issues 2011" at the Alabama Banking Law Seminar in Birmingham, Alabama in February 2011.

4Presented "Hidden Snares for the Ethical Lawyer" at seminars sponsored by= School of Law in 2010 and 2011.

Featured speaker on "The Florida Bar Website Advertising Rules: A Deeper Dive rit a webinar broadcast by the Legal Marketing Association's Southeastern Chapter in May 201, .

Presented "Lawyer Advertising: Where Are We, and Where Are We l ping?' at the Legal Marketing Association's Southeastern Chapter in Charlotte, Nort a-in September 2009.

Presented "The Ethics of the Law Business" at the , Alabama in May 2008. Annual Alumni Seminar in

Presented "New Dimensions in Legal Ethics: GettiQg,;K ng, and Satisfying Clients Ethically" at the Florida Bar Out-of-State Division seminar in New York in February 2008.

/ Spoke on "Ethics Essentials for Alabama Laws" at a continuing legal education seminar in Eufaula, Alabama in March 2007.

Presented "Ethics for Prepaid Leg Lawyers" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2005

Presented "What's New in Flo gal Ethics" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2005. 11 )044, "

Presented "The Raton, Act and Related Ethical Developments" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in B \_ Florida in June 2004.

Spoke on "tvlinintize the Risks of Providing Advice to Your Clients" at the Florida Association of Professional Employer Organizations Annual Meeting in Tampa, Florida in April 2004.

Presented "MJP, the ABA, and Recent Developments in Florida Ethics" at the Florida Bar Out of State Division seminar in New York in December 2003.

Presented "MJP and Other Recent Developments in Florida Legal Ethics" at the Florida Bar Out of State Division Fall seminar in Chicago, Illinois in October 2003.

Presented "Hot Ethical Topics for Business Lawyers" at the Florida Bar Business Law Section Annual Retreat in Palm Beach, Florida in August 2003.

Presented "Ethical Issues in Online Legal Research" at the Virginia State Bar Annual Meeting in Virginia Beach, Virginia in June 2003.

Spoke on "Insurance Defense Ethics" at the Florida Bar Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida in June 2003.

Presented "Ready or Not: Changes on the Ethical Horizon" to the St. Andrews Bay Innatf Court in Panama City, Florida in March 2003. z\_\_

Spoke on "Ethics for Trial Lawyers" at a Virginia Trial Lawyers Association seminar in Roanoke, Virginia in November 2002.

Discussed "Trust Accounting and Succession Planning for Virginia Layers" at an American Liability Protection Society seminar in Grundy, Virginia in September 2002/

=.\ Spoke on "Spotting Conflicts of Interest" at the Florida Bar asters Seminar on Ethics in Boca Raton, Florida in June 2002.

Presented "Hot Topics in Legal Ethics" at the Floridaaw ate Seminar, sponsored by Florida Bar General Practice Section, in Boca Raton, Florida In June 2002.

Discussed "Preventing Legal Malpractice Claims and Ethics Complaints in Business Transactions and General Practice" at a risk management conference sponsored by American National Lawyers Insurance Reciprocal in Grundy, Virginia in May 2002.

Spoke on "Ethics for Corporate Counsel" at the Spring Seminar of the Florida Chapter of the American Corporate Counsel Association (ACCA) in Fort Lauderdale, Florida in May 2002.

Presented "Unethical Conduct: Next Stop, Malpractice Liability" to the Kingsport, Tennessee Bar Association in January 2002.

Spoke on "The Ethical Practice of Criminal Defense" to the Virginia College of Criminal Defense Attorneys in Roanoke, Virginia, in October 2001.

Spoke-on. e Intersection of Ethics, Professionalism, and Malpractice Liability" at the Florida Bar Masters'Setninar on Ethics in Orlando, Florida in June 2001.

Presented "The Top Ten Ethics Issues of the Year" at the Florida Law Update Seminar, sponsored by Florida Bar General Practice Section, in Orlando in June 2001.

Spoke on "Ethical Issues in the Taking and Use of Depositions" at a Jacksonville, Florida continuing legal education seminar in July 2000.

Presented "The Internet and Attorney Ethics" at the annual Amelia Island resort seminar sponsored by the Jacksonville Bar Association in June 2000.

Discussed "Electronic Ethics Issues" at the American Bar Association General Practice Section Spring Meeting in May 2000.

Spoke on "Practical Legal Research and Analysis" at a Jacksonville seminar for paralegals in November 1999.

Presented "Lawyers Online: Do Ethics and Image Mix?" at th. Inns of Court in Orlando in October 1999.

Featured luncheon speaker on the topic of "Professionalism in the Information Age" at the annual Amelia Island resort seminar sponsored by the Jacksonville Bar Association in June 1999.

Presented "Recent Ethical Developments" at the "Hot Topics in Com rcial itigation" seminar sponsored by the Florida Bar Business Law Section in April 1999 -44'

Spoke on "Ethics in the Attorney-Client Relationship" and;Subitance Abuse in the Practice of Law" at The Florida Bar's "Practicing With Professionalism" program in November 1998.

Presented "Why Don't More People Like Us, and What Should We Do About It? Another View of Professional Ethics and Professionalism," at the Jacksonville Inns of Court in September 1998.

Spoke on "Ethics for Business Litigators" at/Ma1998 Florida Bar Business Litigation Certification Examination Review Course in Orlando,Florida.''

Participated in a panel discussion on "Ethical Considerations in Bankruptcy Practice" at the December 1997 meeting of th ampapay Bankruptcy Bar Association.

Participated in a panel discussi09nofi "The Ethics and Expenses of Undue Influence" at the 1996 Attorney Trust Officer Liaison Conference in Palm Beach, Florida.

Spoke to the 199 Florida Conference of County Court Judges on "What You Can Do About Attorneys' Prokss al Conduct."

Addressed the 1772 Annual Meeting of the Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers on the subject of "New and Controversial Advisory Opinions."

Presente \ d "10 Common Sense Rules to Guide You Through the Ethical Minefields of the 1990s" during a 1991 ethics seminar sponsored by Stetson University College of Law.

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05179c5f3f4b0684eb78e87385c368819718d495 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/EFTA02768789.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2993 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 57, + "chars": 118928, + "elapsed_seconds": 18.45, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_7_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg", + "_page_37_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_47_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.889404296875, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.889404296875, + 106.10302734375 + ], + [ + 317.62800000000004, + 106.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "eTh \nMOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEN'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA \nINSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 295.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 512.0511474609375, + 295.66998291015625 + ], + [ + 512.0511474609375, + 348.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 102.81600000000002, + 348.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 354.34799999999996, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 80.19 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.42, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 452.0342102050781, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 452.0342102050781, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 174.42, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 532.6599731445312, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 532.6599731445312, + 134.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 134.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON BRIEFING FOR IN C 4 SPECTION )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.164, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 330.48 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 346.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 151.164, + 346.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.488, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 259.488, + 324.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 324.97200000000004, + 86.03167724609375 + ], + [ + 534.2760000000001, + 86.03167724609375 + ], + [ + 534.2760000000001, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 324.97200000000004, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPS iinwi'S MOTION \nFOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 317.41168212890625 + ], + [ + 460.3551330566406, + 317.41168212890625 + ], + [ + 460.3551330566406, + 343.320556640625 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 343.320556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PREFACE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 282.744, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.3695373535156, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.3695373535156, + 202.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 282.744, + 202.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 228.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 369.036, + 241.38 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 241.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.2200012207031, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 355.1868896484375, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 355.1868896484375, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 270.2200012207031, + 99.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Discovery of Deliberately Concealed E-Mails", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.54000091552734, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.49600000000004, + 111.78000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.49600000000004, + 125.4405517578125 + ], + [ + 90.54000091552734, + 125.4405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. a Deceptively Concealed the E-Mails and Clearly Violated Rule 1.280(b)(6) as \nPreviously Determined by the Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 531.82470703125, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 531.82470703125, + 164.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 164.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. The Truth and this Court's Process-Driven \"Level Playing Field\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 437.824951171875, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 437.824951171875, + 176.4735107421875 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 176.4735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.564, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 343.99603271484375, + 489.23999999999995 + ], + [ + 343.99603271484375, + 504.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 273.564, + 504.2235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The 30 E-mails are Relevant and Directly Controvert Sworn Testimony and \nRepeated Misrepresentations to this Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 514.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 528.156, + 542.0935363769531 + ], + [ + 86.29199999999999, + 542.0935363769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. No Binger \"Surprise in Fact\" and Truth and Justice Requires the Courtroom's Lieht", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.964, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 100.96405029296875 + ], + [ + 89.964, + 100.96405029296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. SI Expressly Waived Work Product Protection in 2011 and His Deceptive \nConcealment of the 30 E-Mails on a Len& Deficient Privilege Log Violated Florida \nJAM and Court Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.49000549316406, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 531.216, + 405.4809265136719 + ], + [ + 88.49000549316406, + 405.4809265136719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Waived Any Attorney-Client and Work-Product Protection by Voluntary \nDisclosure to a Clear Adversary in the Razorback Litication,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 531.828, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 531.828, + 292.7235412597656 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 292.7235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Work-Product Protection Was Waived by a Issue Iniection", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 449.7052307128906, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 449.7052307128906, + 103.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 103.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "F. The Crime-Fraud Exception Applies to Some E-mails", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 382.01861572265625, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 382.01861572265625, + 254.18701171875 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 254.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "G. No Attorney-Client Privilege Exists", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 296.6299743652344, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 296.6299743652344, + 102.47406005859375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 102.47406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 349.9649963378906, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 349.9649963378906, + 418.60406494140625 + ], + [ + 269.28000000000003, + 418.60406494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(1..) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICZ --=", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 286.1702880859375 + ], + [ + 437.962646484375, + 286.1702880859375 + ], + [ + 437.962646484375, + 304.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 234.39600000000002, + 304.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.668, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.676, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 268.668, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.296, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 104.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 280.296, + 104.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 413.9686584472656, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 413.9686584472656, + 134.843505859375 + ], + [ + 185.43599999999998, + 134.843505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCOTT J. LINK'S SWORN DECLARATION OF FACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 443.8872985839844, + 264.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 443.8872985839844, + 279.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 279.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 457.77600000000007, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.9848022460938, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.9848022460938, + 137.853515625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 137.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF Tfftelk4HINARIS A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 416.15999999999997, + 374.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 374.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 463.5350036621094, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 463.5350036621094, + 452.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 452.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MATERIALS REVIEWED/", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 378.4290466308594, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 378.4290466308594, + 361.7235412597656 + ], + [ + 241.12800000000001, + 361.7235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OPERATIVE FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.98, + 528.1200000000001 + ], + [ + 365.656982421875, + 528.1200000000001 + ], + [ + 365.656982421875, + 543.9735260009766 + ], + [ + 253.98, + 543.9735260009766 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MY OPINIONS IN THIS MATTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 631.8 + ], + [ + 395.03607177734375, + 631.8 + ], + [ + 395.03607177734375, + 646.3335418701172 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 646.3335418701172 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TIMOTHY P. CHINARIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.9499969482422, + 80.97052001953125 + ], + [ + 397.18800000000005, + 80.97052001953125 + ], + [ + 397.18800000000005, + 98.62237548828125 + ], + [ + 232.9499969482422, + 98.62237548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EDUCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 183.87 + ], + [ + 202.572, + 200.48199462890625 + ], + [ + 120.56400000000001, + 200.48199462890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EMPLOYMENT Ac", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 119.34, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 375.7444763183594, + 315.9 + ], + [ + 375.7444763183594, + 332.4819641113281 + ], + [ + 119.34, + 332.4819641113281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SELECTED PUBLICATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 291.08026123046875, + 553.23 + ], + [ + 291.08026123046875, + 570.2419738769531 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 570.2419738769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 51, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 299.77581787109375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 299.77581787109375, + 111.99200439453125 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 111.99200439453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.66999816894531, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 306.1082458496094, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 306.1082458496094, + 94.21405029296875 + ], + [ + 121.66999816894531, + 94.21405029296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OTHER PRESENTATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.892, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 280.61376953125, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 280.61376953125, + 320.8619689941406 + ], + [ + 116.892, + 320.8619689941406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768789" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfb892886cb8e525d61f7159fb2aa7c2734c4f68 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_15_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:934c64ac568741178c308234d9d7b5bc40fc611ce57f115fdb0fb8231cd9a246 +size 8364 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_37_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_37_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4113f1de534d99c0a129749bd74429423b12d07a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_37_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6893b9e61e0cf9683b25e555da5d7ec32eb9ad3e91d4a7e5bc136a1008ba4863 +size 8992 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_47_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_47_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc0cfe9525f96c6870bd189e8117c6c9f1426099 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_47_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:23649dbbbbf13e147fb98420e9b98c515177c2788f70f3971aa5fa846e14864a +size 10073 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_7_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_7_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66d250cb585a0a301417f2a83f5bd31b0d79481b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768789/_page_7_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6dc7651b6aa0fac2cd2a311a6ace2812c7cce865144303b99b3d735ca7d9f781 +size 8532 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..469a22be51f1fced294a6d6928ebc1613a89126f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.md @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +lialadvidually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +### COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWA EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAME S IN'S OTION TO STRIKE ION OF 30 E-MAILS + +A + +Cos + +Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("E ponds in opposition to Counter-Plaintiff J. ca Camera Inspection of 30 E-Mails NovemAJr 8, Motion to Strike Epstein's Motion for In + +### ODUCTION + +knows y one path: hide and deflect from the truth. Pursuant to longestablished Florid pre Court precedent, Epstein is required to articulate his "specific legal argument" ' to perly preserve it for appeal to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. This preservatio icularly necessary in light of this Court's recent ruling striking 126 of Epstein's trial exhib , many of which were public records or already in possession and which Epstein specifically identified and provided to more than eight months ago. With regard to the 30 e-mails for in camera review and this Court's ruling on procedure at the November 2, 2018 hearing, Epstein fully complied with this Court's oral ruling and written order — in both the + +(11/2/18 Hearing Tr., 115:5-12.)2 + +pending issue of the 47 e-mails that After ruling that Epstein would not be allowed to use certain e ntified since March 2018 on his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List under a Binger' an C D. s, Court raised the for an in camera review. As to those documents, the Co claims are privile n pending request + +spirit and letter of the law — by filing a motion for in camera inspection of a "generic quality" and leaving the "substantive discussion of those e-mails...under seal by way of memorandum." This is precisely what was accomplished by Epstein. Disappointingly, prefers that Epstein be silenced from making any appellate record — which simply is not the law. unmeritorious Motion to Strike must be denied. + +# EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 2 2 i 1 RING + +... I think that they do have a bit i e1, ' nt connotation and import as it relates to whether or fil d, because if they were contained in the 2010 [sic-201 p il log, it's very difficult to suggest that there would be p ce to knowledge on the part of those documents being p "C ct iallme tilized. + +The Court then instruc rties to submit briefing on the issue: + +d is the emails sent to my office under seal. I will e fo review those emails. What I then would need from ion that's filed, and I don't know how there can be a cussion without discussing the contents of the emails in a hat the memoranda is sent under seal, and for attorneys' eyes + +\*\*\* + +I think the best approach would be for a motion to be filed of a generic quality that does not mention any contents of these emails, but simply tees it up, so to speak, with the understanding on this record today that any substantive discussion of those emails will be done under seal by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and + +&#x27;Binger v. Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). + +&#x27;Excerpts of the November 2, 2018, Hearing Transcript are attached as Exhibit A.

will continue to be under seal, and will be filed under seal in case of a need for appellate review. So that is going to be the direction of the Court, that the motion be filed, but that the memorandum be sent under seal to this Court, hand-delivered to me, sealed. And the same response memorandum be sent to be under seal by Mr. counsel a week later.

(11/2/18 Hearing Tr., 120:17-25; 122:22-123:14.)

This Court only limited Epstein to a motion "generic in nature" to the extent th the motion could not specifically quote any of the e-mails or specifically discuss their motion most certainly did not do. However, this Court also recogniz motion to "tee up" the argument and then provide the specific ref sealed memorandum. The Court's oral ruling was reduc Epstein's counsel, with one minor change by o oral ruling that any "specific" citations and refere th e a v e',4, -mails would be in the memorandum filed under seal. There can be no legitimat ut — Epstein complied with the sealing of the memorandum that specifically cited t i f e.ted the e-mails. ts, hich the for Epstein's to the e-mails in the proposed written Order by d remained consistent with the

( seems to take i e fact that Epstein fully (20 pages) and specifically (as required by the law) raised his I arguments in the motion. flawed argument avoids the obvious — Epstei neve on cited or quoted a specific e-mail, despite how compelling a public argument eac ents for relevance, and for no privilege or protection in light o f defective ding privilege log and sworn testimony in this lawsuit. Rather, Epstein co plied with Florida law by articulating his specific legal arguments as to why the emails are relevant, never had any attorney-client privilege, no longer have protection of workproduct given EM noncompliance with Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and a defective, if not worse, privilege log, as well as producing all of the 27,542 e-mails to an adversary, issue

injection sworn testimony) and the crime fraud exception found in the Florida Evidence Code.

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REOUIRES SPECIFIC LEGAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLATE PRESERVATION

trial counsel knows the law, having been involved in at least one appeal addressing this legal tenet. See Eagleman v. Korzeniowski, 924 So. 2d 855, 860 (Fite. 4th DCA 2006)("In order to be preserved for appellate review, the specific argument n appeal must have been raised when the party objected in the trial court.") In fact, the strict Court of Appeal concluded that, "[ijt defies logic for a party to expect to be a to e no position on an issue in the trial court and then take whatever position is most geous to it on appeal; a party must take some position below in order for this court ow the trial court ruled on that position." Id. at 859. In view of the la he does not. Had Epstein not articulated t legal bases in his motion, would elS should v be darned if he does, darned if have claimed "lack of preservation" See v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 189 So. 3d 279, 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)(' an issue for appellate review, "the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based m raised at trial....") citing Ails v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1109 (Fla. 2010); Cadavi A o 144v. e Key Ins. Co., 246 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018Xaffirmed citing civil cases ho ' th 'n order to be preserved for appellate review, issue must be presented to lower co specific legal argument raised).

Ac dingly, Epstein complied with this Court's Order— and Florida law — by making his specific legal argument and being "generic" in his reference to the e-mails. Not once did Epstein quote or specifically reference an e-mail in his motion. In addition, Epstein did not say anything in his motion that has not already been said multiple times before in public filings.

COMMITTED THE PRECISE FOUL HE CLAIMS AGAINST EPSTEIN

[REDACTED] himself has repeatedly emphasized in his own multiple public filings the complained of references by Epstein to the e-mails:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
D.E.DateDocument
D.E. 125703/06/18[REDACTED] Response to Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, etc.
¶ 5 – "In his Notice of Filing Appendix, Epstein, through counsel, includes privileged materials under a section titled '[REDACTED] Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme.' If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue his malicious lawsuit against [REDACTED], it turns out that [REDACTED] was secretly involved in the Ponzi scheme after all! For example, Epstein claims that the emails are "evidence that shows [REDACTED] direct participation with Rothstein to avoid the structured settlement statute for an Epstein case" and questions whether these e-mails "were turned over to the U.S. Attorney."
[REDACTED]
D.E. 131804/03/18[REDACTED] Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order (withdrawn) – quoting Epstein's statements:
¶ 12 - "Second, the alleged eight-year-old "confidential" information to which [REDACTED] refers is 47 exhibits comprised of a series of communications between [REDACTED] and other attorneys, including Scott Rothstein, that eviscerate Edwards' case against Epstein in its entirety . . . Moreover, on their face, all of these eight-year-old communications clearly show that [REDACTED] claims of work product simply do not apply. These inculpatory communications cannot constitute work-product. They directly relate to issues that [REDACTED] himself has made central to this case and their content provides independent grounds to reject work product protection, including both the crime fraud exception and potential unprofessional conduct . . . the trial court refused to evaluate these issues, choosing instead to exclude the communications on the basis of what the Court believed was Epstein's untimely request to identify them on his Exhibit List."
¶ 14 - "Included among those issues to be perfected at the trial court is [REDACTED] errant claim of 'privilege' which remains a cloud below preventing the admission of crucial evidence that Epstein maintains is dispositive of this case. That evidence must be reviewed in camera by the trial court while the appellate issues are under review. Consistent with this Court's interest in 'fairness' and 'efficient use of the trial court's time and resources,' Epstein will be narrowing his request for in camera review down from 27,000 pages to a readily manageable fraction, 47 exhibits numbering approximately 100 pages."
¶ 15 - "In fact, [REDACTED] counterclaim is thoroughly disproved by direct documentary evidence of [REDACTED] own misconduct and credibility that Epstein is currently asking the trial court to review for presentation to the jury when this case is tried."

documents! cannot complain about Epstein's "generic" re w en repeatedly highlighted and emphasized those statements i c0 times in his own publicly filed RECOGNITIO t "SE D WORK PRODUCT himself has

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
D.E.DateDocument
¶ 17 - "Recent events (appeal and stay) and the discovery of e-mails that totally eviscerate Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]" ("[REDACTED]") claims and shines a light on his true motivation have prompted unprofessional behavior from [REDACTED] and his counsel evidenced by the unilateral setting of hearings, certificates of conferring that never happened and intentional ex parte attendance at a hearing despite knowing of Epstein's counsel's unavailability."
4th DCA04/03/18[REDACTED] Motion to Strike All References to the Alleged Contents of Material Which Epstein and His Counsel Unlawfully Possessed - quoting Epstein's statement (Denied by the 4th DCA)
¶ 7 - "In fact, [REDACTED] counterclaim is thoroughly disproved by direct documentary evidence of [REDACTED] own misconduct and credibility that Epstein is currently asking the trial court to review for presentation to the jury when this case is tried."

More likely than not, s th desperate "striking" attempt to again hide the truth by claiming Epstein disrega res rulings and the "sacrosanct nature of a privilege assertion" because e Is in trouble. Despite his belated claims of sacrosanct privilege (which the Co inly see does not exist in any one of the e-mails), clearly waived any work duct p tection he may have had by — among other compelling reasons -- his complete i comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(bX6). With Epstein's citation Lotion to the Fourth District Court of Appeal's controlling case of General Motors Corp v. , 837 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), is about to suffer the same fate as GM based on his Rule 1.280-noncompliant privilege log and the central issues to lawsuit that the e-mails implicate. As the trial judge in the GM case, this Court cannot:

as suggested by Counsel [asserting the privilege), simply forget about these documents and continue on with this trial as though they

don't exist. This Court still adheres to the belief that: "We who labor here seek only truth."

Id. at 1025.

In fact, establishes the very legal basis why Epstein had to articulate deliberate attempt to "conceal" the e-mails in a misleading privilege log, falsely assert attorneyclient privilege where none existed between an attorney and client, issue injecti given his deposition testimony in this lawsuit as recently as November 2017, and the cri ud xception found in section 90.502, Florida Statutes. In truth, there is nothing violat' e o Court's order to argue that the e-mails are "case-ending." That is argument, not sp ific itation to the content of the e-mails.

CONCLUSIO

Motion to Strike must be seen f s tk th t it — yet another attempt to divert those "who labor here seek[ing] only truth." Eps om 'ed with this Court's ruling and Florida law in filing a motion for in camera revie mails, not once citing or specifically referencing the e-mails' content, but raisin" ut c legal argument" as required by law. Epstein next followed both the spirit and le the law in filing under seal his memorandum which quoted and cited the specifi 30 e at which never were protected by attorney-client privilege, have no arguable work d lock given actions with waiver and a non-compliant privilege log desi and the e- ils be illuminated by the light of this courtroom. ive the recipient — Epstein. attempt to hide the truth must be denied

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 14, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).

LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA
+ 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930
+ West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+ (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax]

By: /s/ Scott J. Link
+ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991)
+ Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903)
+ Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com
+ Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com
+ Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com

Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

SERVICE LIST

+ + + + + + + + +
+

Jack Scarola
+ Karen E. Terry
+ David P. Vitale, Jr.
+ Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+mep@searcylaw.com
+isx@searcylaw.com
+dvitale@searcylaw.com
+scarolateam@searcylaw.com
+terryteam@searcylaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+Bradley J. Edwards

+		 +

Philip M. Burlington
+ Nichole J. Segal
+ Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
+ Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
+ 444 West Railroad Avenue
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+pmb@FLAppellateLaw.com
+njs@FLAppellateLaw.com
+kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████

+
+
J. ██████████
+ Pottinger LLC
+ 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
+brad@epllc.com
+Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
+██████████ J. ██████████ + 		+

Marc S. Nurik
+ Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
+ One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
+ Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
+marc@nuriklaw.com
+Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

Jack A. Goldberger
+ Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+ 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+smahoney@agwpa.com
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
+Jeffrey Epstein

+		 +

Paul Cassell
+ 383 S. University St.
+ Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+
+

Jay Howell
+ Jay Howell & Associates
+ 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
+ Jacksonville, FL 32211
+jay@jayhowell.com
+Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W.
+and Jane Doe

+

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

EXHIBIT A

NOT A CERTIFIED COPY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, )

) )

Petitioner/Counter-Defendant, )

) vs. No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. )

)

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ) and J. f ) (1 s individually, )

Plaintiff/C efendant Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List, et al.

We Beach, Florida

er 2nd, 2018

:25 a.m. - 1:06 p.m.

The above-styled cause came on for hearing e at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, West the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, Presiding Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, on the 2nd day of November, 2018.

1 defense challenge to that privilege log.

2 MR. LINK: That's correct.

3 MR. SCAROLA: And while -- well, I don't
4 want to get too deep into these arguments.

5 THE COURT: (Let's not get too deep into)
6 (them,) because (I) think (that) (they) (do) (have) (a) (bit)
7 (of) (a) (different) (connotation) (and) (import) (as) (it)
8 (relates) (to) (whether) (or) (not) (late-filed,) (because)
9 (if) (they) (were) (contained) (in) (the) (2010) (privilege)
10 (log,) (it's) (very) (difficult) (to) (suggest) (that) (there)
11 (would) (be) (prejudice) (as) (to) (knowledge) (on) (the) (part)
12 (of) (those) (documents) (being) (potentially) (utilized,)

13 So, what I would like you to do then is --
14 we're getting dangerously close on time --

15 MR. VITALE: Your Honor, just a
16 clarification for the record.

17 Along with the disk, there was a folder
18 containing 32 hard copies of materials that
19 Fowler [REDACTED] printed from the disk.

20 If my memory serves me correctly, 22 of
21 those documents were listed on Mr. [REDACTED]'
22 privilege log, one of them had handwritten
23 notations. So in terms of the discovery issue,
24 I just wanted the record to reflect that hard
25 copies were, in fact, in possession of

1 say. Not a magistrate, special [REDACTED] f.

2 MR. SCAROLA: After which Judge [REDACTED] made
3 it very clear that he would be ruling on issues
4 of privilege with regard to any privilege
5 assertions in a case in which the subpoena was
6 issued over which he was presiding. So Judge
7 Carney never made --

8 MR. LINK: We don't disagree, Judge
9 Hafele.

10 MR. SCAROLA: Judge Carney never made any
11 privilege --

12 THE COURT: No, I'm not suggesting he did.
13 That wasn't really my intent at all. And even
14 if he did, I don't think that it would be any
15 way, shape or form binding here.

16 MR. LINK: We agree you're the person.

17 THE COURT: (SO [WHAT] (I) [WILL] [NEED] (IS) [THE]
18 [EMAILS] (SENT) (TO) [MY] [OFFICE] (UNDER) [SEAL]. (I) [WILL] [BE]
19 [THE] [ONLY] [ONE] (TO) [REVIEW] [THOSE] [EMAILS].

20 [WHAT] (I) [THEN] [WOULD] [NEED] (FROM) [YOU] (IS) [THE]
21 [MOTION] (THAT'S) (FILED), (AND) (I) [DON'T] (KNOW) [HOW] [THERE]
22 [CAN] [BE] @ [VIABLE] [DISCUSSION] [WITHOUT] [DISCUSSING]
23 [THE] [CONTENTS] [OF] [THE] [EMAILS] (IN) @ [SETTING] (THAT)
24 [THE] [MEMORANDA] (IS) (SENT) (UNDER) [SEAL], (AND) (FOR)
25 [ATTORNEYS'] [EYES] [ONLY].

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 attorneys'-eyes-only documents that were handed over that do not include the documents that are listed on the privilege log. And that's what we're talking about here. We're talking about privileged documents. The fact that they obtained those documents improperly does give them any greater right, if anythin gives them a lesser right, to challen this point, the assertion of privi

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE COURT: Well, that m . be fine for legal argumen c That may want to get to the practical aspec ying to -- for my own purpose, be ab1 equately review the legal arguments cc ection with the emails at issue. least from the attorneys' standpoi Mr. Epstein's standpoint, as I under tand it, the cat is out of the bag in tjtat r and So, I can't undo what's already done, and that's been years ago.

20 21 MR. SCAROLA: So we don't want to aggravate the problem.

22 23 cnD GLO THE COURT: And I agree. That's why I'm saying that (Wftrilik)(aral lail5755T5H)(would)ED (for)OffiTrtaW4(00N3WallIDODDCD(generiZ)(2124413:) (fENO(HUFW71150617051.131- nWETTnFitreAfff)(Claq

1

(emails,) but (simply tees (it) up,) so to (speak,)

2

(with the understanding on this record today)

3

(that) (any) (substantive) (discussion) of (those) (emails)

4

(will) (be) (done) (under) (seal) (by) (way) of (memorandum,)

5

(and) (that) (will) (be) (done) (under) (seal) (and) (will)

6

(continue) (to) (be) (under) (seal,) and (will) (be) (filed)

7

(under) (seal) (in) (case) of (a) (need) (for) (appellate)

8

(review.)

9

(So) (that) (is) (going) (to) (be) (the) (direction) of

10

(the) (Court,) (that) (the) (motion) (be) (filed,) (but) (that)

11

(the) (memorandum) (be) (sent) (under) (seal) (to) (this)

12

(Court,) (hand-delivered) (to) (me,) (sealed.) (And) (the)

13

(same) (response) (memorandum) (be) (sent) (to) (me) (under)

14

(seal) (by) (Mr.) (Edwards') (counsel) (a) (week) (later.)

1516

MR. LINK: And shared with each other,
though?

1718

THE COURT: Absolutely, for attorneys'
eyes only.

19202122232425

MR. LINK: Understood.

THE COURT: Okay? And Mr. [REDACTED], I
understand, is co-counsel, so he has the right
to look at them. But it's not to be
distributed to anyone else --

MR. LINK: Understand. It's very clear.

THE COURT: -- until I issue an order of

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9e0e4d3c11613e1070e2d94b22bc4b378f79d97 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846/EFTA02768846.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,760 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768846.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 24625, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.14, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFR \nRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWA \nEPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAME \nS IN'S \nOTION TO STRIKE \nION OF 30 E-MAILS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 497.1540222167969, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 497.1540222167969, + 356.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 356.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 450.2749938964844 + ], + [ + 355.7897033691406, + 450.2749938964844 + ], + [ + 355.7897033691406, + 464.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 464.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 2 2 i 1 RING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.56, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 532.6233520507812, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 532.6233520507812, + 224.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 79.56, + 224.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REOUIRES SPECIFIC LEGAL \nARGUMENT FOR APPELLATE PRESERVATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.476, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 475.4912109375, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 475.4912109375, + 155.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 136.476, + 155.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMMITTED THE PRECISE FOUL HE CLAIMS AGAINST EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.432, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.604, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 144.432, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.088, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 474.91200000000003, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 137.088, + 391.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSIO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 347.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 347.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 386.17199999999997, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 374.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 471.852, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 446.7841796875, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 446.7841796875, + 109.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 170.74800000000002, + 109.08416748046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 54 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768846" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2be3f1ad6ab61adce357558ea2aaaaea5b33f45f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.md @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFILD dersigned has cancelled the following + +hearing: + +DATE: November 26, 201 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable aid Hafele + +PLACE: ixie Highway. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPEC TTERS THAT WERE TO BE HEARD: + +## NOTICE OF CANCEL HEARING + +Motion to Compel [filed 2.26.18] Jeffrey Epstein's Responses to Requests for Admissions + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstien +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26th day of Nov, 2018. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Attorney E-Mail: jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFY + +adv. Epstien Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Philip Burlington, Esquire pmb®flappellatelaw.com;kbt®Flappellatelaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. + +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com iS 5) J. MI, Esquire Pottinger LLC 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jay Howell, Esquire jay@jayhowell.com Jay Howell & Associates P.A. 644 Cesery Boulevard, StitA50 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Phone: (904)-680- 4 Fax: (904)-680-1 + +Paul G. Cassell Es wire paulca,sscl,lakw.utah.edu S.J. QuiaIetCollege of Law 383 S Univ rsity Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstien +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4973bd07de88a9b533e00e01a1d16180980df528 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861/EFTA02768861.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768861.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2944, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SPEC \nTTERS THAT WERE TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 358.2282409667969, + 572.67 + ], + [ + 358.2282409667969, + 588.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 588.8625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCEL HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 432.3966979980469, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 432.3966979980469, + 368.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 178.09199999999998, + 368.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 355.9562683105469, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 355.9562683105469, + 150.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 150.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768861" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47b45de2ed05b5771fc8a0e9496fca8c98c93580 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Pin EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and individually, + +Defendants. + +## NO Ac INC CONFIDENTIAL COURT RE DER SEAL + +pursuant to the 15th Jt i ircuit Administrative Order No. 2.303- 3/18 and this Court's November 6, 2018 under seal his Confidential Memo In Camera Inspection of 30 E- ibits thereto. riefing for In Camera Inspection (16) files w in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for an + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 16, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX 1 ) and that a copy of the sealed envelope containing the Confidential Memorandum is being hand delivered to Scott J. Link, Eq. of Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +O 'S + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA c + +Florida Bar No.: 16944 + +DAVID P. VITALMt + +Florida Bar No.: + +Attorney E-M ' earcylaw.com and mmccann astcom + +Primary arolaTeam@searcylaw.com + +Searc a carola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +21 ach Lakes Boulevard + +Beach, Florida 33409 + +561) 686-6300 + +Cp (561) 383-9451 tomeys for J. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +J. Esquire staff.efile®pathtojustice.com 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberget®agwpa.com smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com kbt®FLAppellateLaw.com Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 + +Attorneys for + ++6s + +Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com tbermudez®flacivillaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffre + +Scott J. Link, &qui Eservice®Iinkrocklaw.com; Scott®finkrocklaw.com; Ka261 nkrocklaw.com; Angelaqi)inkrocIdaw.com; q ., kit a@linlcrocklaw.com; linkrocklaw.com & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 Fax: (561)-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8b341a9679b8ee4056a847226cb2e5da44a185a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865/EFTA02768865.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768865.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2688, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nPin EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.956, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 535.9083862304688, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 313.956, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NO Ac INC \nCONFIDENTIAL COURT RE DER SEAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 447.3056640625, + 326.43 + ], + [ + 447.3056640625, + 356.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 164.62800000000001, + 356.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.9211730957031, + 86.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.7062683105469, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 353.7062683105469, + 86.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 86.36248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768865" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fd197b1cc5042ab716f7e241b753bcaf9994955 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING** +**(30 MINUTES)** + +2010 OCT 27 PM 3:44 +CIRCUIT COUNTY + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** November 19, 2010 + +**TIME:** 2:45 p.m. + +**JUDGE:** Hon. David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse +205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +1. 1. Epstein's Objections to ██████████ Request for Admissions dated 9/16/10 +2. 2. Epstein's Objections to ██████████ Request to Produce dated 9/16/10 +3. 3. Epstein's Objections to ██████████ General Interrogatories dated 9/16/10 + +Epstein v. [REDACTED], et al. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Special Set Hearing—30 min. + +1. 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +2. 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +3. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +4. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +5. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 27th day of October, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Epstein v. [REDACTED], et al. +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Special Set Hearing—30 min. + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c49b21e4ee4c95ff8ed8dd833ba07411c70d35a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868/EFTA02768868.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768868.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3147, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING (30 MINUTES)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.662, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 406.812, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 406.812, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 193.662, + 375.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 607.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.77999999999997, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 348.34799999999996, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 348.34799999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 255.77999999999997, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768868" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..801f534c562743c90c3d90a22dbb521c359e28bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LIST FILED OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN, CONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES + +This matter was before the Court for hearing on Edwards' Motion to Strike Jeffrey Epstein's Exhibit and Witness List filed October 5, 2018 and to, once again, confirm existing pretrial deadlines. Upon consideration of which his hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED'that this Court's standard form Pretrial Order Setting Trial for December 4, 2018, was not intended to disturb any prior case-specific Order of this Court with respect to the disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, and to the extent that the Pretrial Order of August 3, 2018, is inconsistent with prior Orders with respect to the disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, those provisions of the August 3, 2018 Order are withdrawn. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm County, Florida, this /2 day of 19-7/ , 2018. + +D D HAFELE CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +██████████ adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Order on Motion to Strike Epstein's Exhibit & Witness Lists +Filed 10/5/18 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for ██████████ J. ██████████ + +██████████ J. ██████████, Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +██████████ Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 + +la adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG Order on Motion to Strike Epstein's Exhibit & Witness Lists Filed l0/5/18 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire paul.cassell@law.utah.edu S.J. Quinney College of Law 383 S University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire CO S Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 "S )A49 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein . + +?S' Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire kara@linkrocklaw.com Scott J. Link, Esquire Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Angela@linkide w.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; rachel@linIcnacklaw.com Link & Rockenbach, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-727-3600 / Fax: (561)-727-360 Attorneys for Jeff y + +Marc S. NtuikQre marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12c8980a13b15aa48d163fc337bd4b23a9f42901 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871/EFTA02768871.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768871.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3438, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S EXHIBIT AND \nWITNESS LIST FILED OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND TO, ONCE AGAIN, CONFIRM \nEXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 530.6353759765625, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 530.6353759765625, + 335.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 335.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 149.04 + ], + [ + 343.944, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 162.81 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768871" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bc3260c675237a5bc03265d62e3f9819e7749df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +J. MOM + +L M, + +Defendant(s). + +CO S + +/ IN + +## ORDER SPECIAL SETTING HEARING + +(2 HOURS minutes reserved) + +THIS CAUSE came before this Court and is hereby set for hearing on In Camera Inspection Issues on November 30, 2016 at 10:00 A.M., at the Palm Beach County Main Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 in Courtroom 10 D. This matter may not be canceled without a Cart Order. + +DONE AND ORDERED in day of November, 2018. V m Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 15th + +( S' + +O + +Copies forms -ed to: + +![](_page_0_Picture_14.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +- Andrew A. Harris aah flappellatelaw.com) Fr, James (brad@epllc.com) +- **Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com)** John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN. JR + +## Order Special Set Hearing CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- Fri KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAW.COM) +- Kara Berard Rockenbach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) +- KAREN E TERRY (\_TERRYTEAM@SEARCYLAW.COM) P Karen Elizabeth Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) +- Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) +- **PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp@law.utah.edu) I"; PHII.IP M BURLINGTON (PMBeFLAPPELLATELAW.COM) Fri RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) ri Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmail.com)** +- **SCOTT J LINK (SCOT I@LINKROCKLAVV.COfv1)** +- **service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytria** +- **William Bennett .(wbk@searcylaw.com) Rodney G (alex@matrixmediatio . " William B.. (\_,kingteam@searcylaw.com) AS f; -** +- **Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina@ dcla .com)** +- **John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.corn** +- **David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@searcylaw.com)** +- **James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com)** +- **Tonja Haddad Colema @tonjahaddad.com)** +- **NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com)** +- **Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) P John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com)** +- **Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com)** +- **Andrew\* Harris (jrh@flappellatelaw.com)** +- **David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com)** +- **NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com)** +- **Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com) P Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) (staff.efile@pathtojustice.com)** +- **Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com)** + +**CP** + +Order Special Set Hearing +CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +- Tonja Haddad Coleman ([tonja@tonjahaddad.com](mailto:tonja@tonjahaddad.com)) +- Kara Berard Rockenbach ([troy@linkrocklaw.com](mailto:troy@linkrocklaw.com)) +- David P. Vitale Jr. ([vitaleteam@searcylaw.com](mailto:vitaleteam@searcylaw.com)) + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2.207-9/12 + +"If you are aperson with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355- 4380at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algtin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga Ia amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefono ntimero (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, oinmediatamente despite de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido ode la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim Id bezwen akomodasyon pou wka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san 011 pa gen okenn lajan pou wpeye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte ko0donate pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefon Ii se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou wparet nan tribinal la mavens ke 7jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou wtande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32302a80258112b40ced7a259c2a277720a8766e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/EFTA02768874.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4750, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.95, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 477.9530944824219, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 477.9530944824219, + 102.73309326171875 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 102.73309326171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SPECIAL SETTING HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.332, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 408.3151550292969, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 408.3151550292969, + 332.60302734375 + ], + [ + 190.332, + 332.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Order Special Set Hearing \nCASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 288.8101806640625, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 288.8101806640625, + 69.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 69.2005615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 382 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768874" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/_page_0_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/_page_0_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55ddf2bd4933fe2c64b09d5763ed615d4a1aef04 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768874/_page_0_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2db6a8c0a5bcd80e25df4ea6acc4a47645880190ab0c788b5acbeb7041e0db82 +size 13292 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768878/EFTA02768878.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768878/EFTA02768878.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ea4f1b1ccdd60827a33196d0b7f0eb2f41860aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768878/EFTA02768878.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintiMountcr-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF U + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Counter-Defe y Epstein, postpones the following hearing before the Honorable Donald W t: t ip i Circuit Court at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highwa 10D, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401: + +MOTION: Counter-Defen to Videotapin pstein's November 5, 2018, Limited Objection + +DATE: Novem + +TINIE: 8:45 a.m. + ++6s + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on November 26, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(bX1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/Scott.l. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach 0 903) Primary: Sco linIcr Primary: Secondary: Tina Secondary: + +Counsel -Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +## SERVI + +Jack Scarola ( 1 A RNO0.L.A 16944 FiAlorida Bar Attorney E-Mail: jsxa arc r aw.com; and mmccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: iscarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney-Strarnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach es Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. 'S'Aisiss\ + +"S aw + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + +[REDACTED] Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Hearing + +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; Troy@linkrocklaw.com; tina@linkrocklaw.com; +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768881/EFTA02768881.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768881/EFTA02768881.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5ec0216cf99a14b883994df799223fb486b2222 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768881/EFTA02768881.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768881.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3046, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 541.008, + 116.35247802734375 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.35247802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": " os aa a PiaZ lee'tr. Joseph' Leonardi Ffrckess Server #364 V + +> > SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED INC. P.O. Box 15255 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 (561) 655-0205 + +Our Job Serial Number: SSD-2018003131 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +# SUBPOENA FOR + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Igor Zinoviev 221 Cornell Drive Lake Worth, FL 33460 + +YOU ARE HEREBY C 2 (Palm Beach County Courtho Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie .7 a.m. to testify in\_ti action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. "-- DED to appear before the Honorable Donald Hafele, Judge of the Circuit Court, at the Palm Beach County y, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, on December 4, 2018\* at 9:00 + +THIS IS NOT THE EXACT DATE AND TIME YOUR TESTIMONY WILL BE NEEDED. THEREFORE, PLEASE CALL MY SECRETARY AT (561) 686-6300 BEFORE THE TRIAL DATE INDICATED ON THE SUBPOENA AND SHE WILL THEN ADVISE YOU OF THE DATE AND TIME YOU SHOULD APPEAR. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorneys and, unless excused from this Subpoena by these attorneys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +DATED this 20th day of November, 2018. + +Jack •rola O half of the Court + +Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 404' + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for J. + +iS 4/) 9 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +tbermudez@flacivillaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Eservice@linkrocklaw.com; +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Kara@linkrocklaw.com; +Angela@linkrocklaw.com; +Tanya@linkrocklaw.com; +Tina@linkrocklaw.com +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 301 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768885/EFTA02768885.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768885/EFTA02768885.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..654394c1971afe6d6f4a0e3af1be9f6c8f8fcaf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768885/EFTA02768885.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,351 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768885.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7149, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING THE VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE OF SUBPOENA FOR TRIAL FOR IGOR ZINOVIEV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.312, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 138.312, + 336.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 352.51199999999994, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 83.42999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.588, + 82.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 398.46221923828125, + 82.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 398.46221923828125, + 96.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 213.588, + 96.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.404, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 550.206787109375, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 550.206787109375, + 110.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 316.404, + 110.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 329.66999999999996 + ], + [ + 375.15599999999995, + 345.363037109375 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 345.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 82.62 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768885" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c18cef03050fece66c7ffcdac86ee35c1e03c3ac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE F It 1 tENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ME. + +L M, Defendant(s). + +A + +Cos + +## AMENDED ORDER SPECIAL SE ARING (2 HOURS resery + +THIS CAUSE came before this Court Inspection Issues on November 30, 2018 at Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, W matter may not be canceled without a Co er. y set for hearing on In Camera .M., at the Palm Beach County Main ch, FL 33401 in Courtroom 10 D. This + +DONE AND ORDERED i Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 26th day of November, 2018. + +IC + +Copies furnished to: + +![](_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg) + +DONALD HAFELE Circuit Judge + +Andrew A. Harris (aah@flappellatelaw.com) James (brad@eplIc.com) Jay C Howell (jay@jayhowell.com) John Scarola Lscarolateam@searcylaw.com) L ACKERMAN, JR ( M) + +- KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH (KARA@LINKROCKLAW.COM) rz Kara Berard Rockenbach (kbrock@flacivillaw.com) KAREN E TERRY LTERRYTEAM@SEARCYLAW.COM) Karen Elizabeth Terry (ket@searcylaw.com) Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Matthew D Weissing (matt@epllc.com) Nichole Johnston Segal (njs@flappellatelaw.com) PAUL G CASSELL (cassellp@law.utah.edu) +- 21. PHILIP M BURLINGTON (PMB@FLAPPELLATELAW.COM) RACHEL J GLASSER (RACHEL@LINKROCKLAW.COM) Rachel Jenny Glasser (rjglasserl@gmailcom) SCOTT J LINK (SCOTT@LINKROCKLAW.COM) service@jurytrial.co S, Adler (service@jurytria William Bennett (wbk@searcylaw.com) William B.. Lkingteam@searcylaw.com) rz Rodney G (alex@matrixmediati Kara Berard Rockenbach (christina John R. Beranek (csullivan@ausley.co David P. Vitale Jr. (dvitale@searcylaw.com) IJ James B Chaplin (efile@mediationfirminc.com) Tonja Haddad Coleman (efiling@tonjahaddad.com) NICHOLE J SEGAL (fa@flappellatelaw.com) Jayme Day (Jayme@tonjahaddad.com) John R. Beranek (jberanek@ausley.com) Jack A Goldberger (jgoldberger@agwpa.com) Andrew A Hanis (jrh@flappellatelaw.com) David P. Vitale Jr. (kar@searcylaw.com) NICHOLE J SEGAL (kbt@flappellatelaw.com) Marc Nurik (marc@nuriklaw.com) Jack A Goldberger (smahoney@agwpa.com) (staff.efile@pathtojustice.com) +- 71. Scott Jeffrey Link (Tina@linkrocklaw.com) + +/71 Tonja Haddad Coleman (tonja@tonjahaddad.com) Flo Kara Berard Rockenbach (troy@linkrocklaw.com) David P. Vitale Jr. (vitaleteam@searcylaw.com) + +co + +This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2.207-9/12 + +you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number 61) 355- 4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or i diately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduledpBpea nce is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 71 + +"Si usted es una persona minusválida que necesita algú amiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene der o in tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la I ili ad de ponerse en contacto con 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm e brida 33401; teléfono número (561) 355-4380, por lo menos 7 días a cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmedi ta después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la co ints" en la que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discappt i del oído o de la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon mona Id enfim Id n akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou n okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri ont te kóódonatè pwogram Lwa pou ameriken ki Enfim yo nan Tribi al Ko alm Beach la Id nan 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, 33401; telefón li se (561) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen ran u parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa k asyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si o ge woblèm pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ffe247c1a983e5946c93e443f67a72ccab4bf1f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/EFTA02768891.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4130, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE F It 1 tENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 482.95001220703125, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 482.95001220703125, + 98.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 98.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED ORDER SPECIAL SE ARING \n(2 HOURS resery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.24, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.223876953125, + 314.28000000000003 + ], + [ + 446.223876953125, + 343.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 165.24, + 343.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768891" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1665ffc7c699094c72293629941625371c25ada1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768891/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b869dcb4f2f94eec39349edcd6a64b3a361090c004c4166a8fc3e8f02ac3c88 +size 13147 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02ebbe61ed7e95f69fa8de7dc336e2cda97f060e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN i ividually, and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. + +A(Th + +## AGREED ORDER ON VIDEOTAPING THE TRIAL + +THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on November 26, 2018, upon Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Limited Objection to Videotaping the Trial. The Court, having reviewed Epstein's Limited Objettion, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +1. Radical Media's request to videotape the trial of this matter is GRANTED with the understanding that if the company chooses to videotape any portion of the trial, it is required to videotape the entire trial. If Radical Media fails to adhere to this requirement, it is subject to sanctions by this Court. + +2. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.450 and this Court's Administrative Order 2.208-2/09, the media is limited to the following at the trial of this matter: + +- Only one portable television camera operated by only one person within the courtroom is allowed. +- Only one still photographer not using more than two still cameras within the courtroom is allowed. + +- Only one audio system operated by one person within the courtroom is allowed. +- Only equipment that does not produce distracting lights or sounds within the courtroom is allowed. No artificial lighting device shall be used in connection with the quipment. +- The equipment shall be positioned in such locations as the judge desi +- Media representatives shall not move around the court facility while proceedings are in session and microphones and equipment shall not be move tthe proceedings. +- Media representatives shall not record audio or visually an of the bench conferences of counsel or any of the discussions between the atto eys and their clients. + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, P ty, Florida this Jay + +of November, 2018. + +Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Ba hart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 mep@searcvlaw.com jsx@searcvlaw.com dvitaleOsearevlaw.com scarolateainfasearcylaw.com terryteamAsearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel or De endant/Counter-Plaintiff + +LD W. HAFELE + +Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 pmb@FLAnnellateLaw.com nis@FLApnellateLaw.com kbteFLAppellateLaw.com Co-Coto • /Mounter - Plaint/ J. + +|

[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268
brad@epllc.com
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]

|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

| +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Paul Cassell
383 S. University
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
cassellp@law.utah.edu
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| +|

Scott J. Link
Kara Berard Rockenbach
Link & Rockenbach, PA
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Scott@linkrocklaw.com
Kara@linkrocklaw.com
Tina@linkrocklaw.com
Troy@linkrocklaw.com
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein

|

Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jay@jayhowell.com
Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M.,
E.W. and Jane Doe

| \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c287daedd0d13e0c205e8272a327216b961b3f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895/EFTA02768895.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768895.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5680, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 123.35302734375 + ], + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 123.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON VIDEOTAPING THE TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 439.5086669921875, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 439.5086669921875, + 340.10302734375 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 340.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.204, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 342.72, + 447.12000000000006 + ], + [ + 255.204, + 447.12000000000006 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768895" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24d5021e6a2af9bb93312d79810c4443a2523fcc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.md @@ -0,0 +1,720 @@ +J. and L.M., individually, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, + +Defendants, + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v . + +O C + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECON AMENDED PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND RD1CT FORM + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADL WARDS, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Second Amende po Jury Instructions and Verdict Forms for trial in the above-styled matter. These S ded Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form incorporate all prior submissi visions and contain certain edits to Instruction 201.1 (Description of the Case).', + +| No. 1 2 | e O1 1..2 | )? Jury Instruction Accepted (YiN) Description of the Case Roles | +|---------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 3 | 201.3 | Explanation of the Voir Dire Process | +| 4 | 202.1 | Introduction | +| 5 | 202.2 | Explanation of the Trial Procedure | +| 6 | 202.3 | Note-Taking by Jurors | +| 7 | 202.4 | Juror Questions | +| 8 | 301.1 | Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Admissions | +| 9 | 301.2 | Instruction When Firest Item of Evidnece is Admitted | + +| 10 | 301.3 | Instruction When Evidence is Published to the Jury | | +|----|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| 11 | 301.4 | Instruction Regarding Visual or Demonstrative Aids | | +| 12 | 301.5 | Evidence Admitted for a Limited Purpose | | +| 13 | 406.1 | Introduction | | +| 14 | 406.2 | Summary of Claims | | +| 15 | 406.3 | Greater Weight of the Evidence | | +| 16 | 406.4 | Probable Cause | | +| 17 | 406.5 | Legal Malice | | +| 18 | 406.6 | Instituting or Continuing a Proceeding | | +| 19 | 406.7 | Legal Cause | | +| 20 | 406.8 | Issues on Claim | | +| 21 | 406.9 | Burden of Proof on Claim | | +| 22 | 406.12 | Malicious Prosecution Damages | | +| 23 | Special Instruction | Amount of Loss or Harm is Uncertain or Difficult to Determine | | +| 24 | 503.1 | Punitive Damages – Bifurcated Procedure | | +| 25 | 601.1 | Weighing of the Evidence | | +| 26 | 601.2 | Believability of Witnesses | | +| 27 | Special Instruction | Adverse Inference Instruction – Fifth Amendment | | +| 28 | Special Instruction | Federal Rule of Evidence 415 & Florida Statutes Section 90.404 | | +| 29 | Special Instruction | Natural and Probable Consequences | | +| 30 | Special Instruction | Litigation Privilege | | +| 31 | Special Instruction | Jeffrey Epstein's Failure to Testify at Trial | | +| 32 | Special Instruction | The Sword-Shield Doctrine | | +| 33 | Special Instruction | Epstein's Failure to Raise Advice of Counsel as a Defense | | +| 34 | 601.5 | Concluding Instruction (Before Final Argument) | | +| 35 | 700 | Closing Instructions | | +| 36 | Verdict Form | [REDACTED] Verdict Form | | + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 26th day of November, 2018. + +/s/ David P. Vitale Jr. + +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +DAVID P. VITALE JR. + +Florida Bar No.: 115179 + +Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com; and +mmccann@searcylaw.com + +Primary E-Mail: scarolateam@searcylaw.com +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: 561-383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +ADV. EPSTEIN Casc No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Second Amended Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form Page 4 of 56 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Scott J. Link, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, P.A. Scott®Iinkrocklaw.com KaraelinIcrocklaw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire njs®FLAppellateLaw.com; kb Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for J. w.com + +J. Edwardk, uire staff.efile@pathto tic .com 425 N Andre\ v ue, Suite 2 Fort La 33301 Phone: (9 42820 Fax: (954)- 4-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +## PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS + +### **201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE** + +Welcome. The Clerk will now administer your oath. + +Now that you have been sworn, I'd like to give you an idea about what we are here to do. This is a civil trial. A civil trial is different from a criminal case, where a defendant is charged by the state prosecutor with committing a crime. The subject of a civil trial is a disagreement between people or companies [or others, as appropriate], where the claims of one or more of these parties have been brought to court to be resolved. It is called "a trial of a lawsuit." + +*This case concerns the following. Beginning in the summer of 2008, [REDACTED] represented three females, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who claimed they had been repeatedly sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein. At the same time, dozens of other alleged victims were identified as having been sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein, and many of those underage children retained lawyers in order to file civil claims against Epstein. Attorney [REDACTED] took a leading role in coordinated discovery efforts in those sexual abuse lawsuits.* + +*Also in the summer of 2008, Attorney Edwards was lead counsel in a separate lawsuit against the federal government, which sought to invalidate a plea agreement that Epstein had entered into with the federal government. In that Agreement, the Federal Government agreed not to file Federal criminal charges against Epstein in exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to two state felony charges concerning his alleged molestation of children. He was registered as a Sex Offender and sentenced to 18 months incarceration followed by a period of house arrest. He was also required not to challenge the civil claims of approximately 40 young women identified by Federal Authorities as victims of his abuse, if those victims agreed to limit their damage claims.* + +*In April of 2009, Attorney [REDACTED] took a job at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler law firm. Approximately six months later, while Attorney [REDACTED] was prosecuting his clients' sexual molestation/abuse claims against Epstein and pursuing the separate federal action to invalidate Epstein's plea Agreement, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm, Scott Rothstein, had secretly been engaged since 2005 in a massive Ponzi scheme. Rothstein's scheme raised hundreds of millions of dollars from 2005 to 2009 and was one of the largest frauds in U.S. history. While Rothstein's Ponzi scheme began years before Attorney [REDACTED] sued Epstein and years before Attorney [REDACTED] was employed by Rothstein's law firm, after [REDACTED] joined the firm, Rothstein used the claims against Epstein to attract additional Ponzi scheme investors by selling them interests in non-existent settlements of both filed and made-up cases. The fact that Rothstein used the pending claims against Epstein to attract investors in the Ponzi scheme is not disputed. Epstein sued [REDACTED] for knowingly assisting Rothstein in the Ponzi scheme and accused [REDACTED] in that Complaint of committing a number of serious criminal offenses. Whether Epstein had probable cause to support that claim is an issue to be decided in this case.* + +Rothstein's scheme was disclosed by the media in November of 2009, and on December 1, 2009 Rothstein was indicted by the federal government. Except in Epstein's lawsuit, [REDACTED] name was never associated with Rothstein's criminal scheme and he was never charged with any wrongdoing. Nonetheless, six days later, Jeffrey Epstein sued Rothstein, [REDACTED], and L.M., one of Epstein's victims. At the time Epstein filed this lawsuit, he had already settled thirteen sexual molestation claims brought by other underage females, and he faced more than two dozen additional pending sexual molestation claims, including the three cases being pursued by Mr. [REDACTED] on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Mr. Edwards also continued to pursue the federal action to invalidate Epstein's please, which if successful, could expose Jeffrey Epstein to a possible lengthy Federal prison sentence. + +In his 5-count lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein alleged that Mr. Edwards committed numerous crimes against Epstein by prosecuting fabricated or exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits on behalf of Mr. [REDACTED] 'three underage clients, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. According to Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit, these claims were "weak" and had "[REDACTED] inimal value," and the real reason Mr. [REDACTED] pursued those allegedly false sexual molestation claims on behalf of the minor child victims was to knowingly assist in a criminal Ponzi scheme. In the lawsuit, Jeffrey Epstein also sought, in part, to stop all of the lawsuits being prosecuted by [REDACTED] against Epstein. + +In this case which you have been selected to serve as jurors, Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed knowingly false allegations against [REDACTED], that he filed those false allegations in 2009 in the absence of probable cause and with malice, and that Jeffrey Epstein continued to prosecute these knowingly false allegations against [REDACTED] for years. + +This case therefore concerns whether Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to file and continue that lawsuit against Attorney [REDACTED], alleging that Mr. [REDACTED] had committed criminal acts against Jeffrey Epstein by prosecuting fabricated or exaggerated sexual abuse claims in civil lawsuits on behalf of three underage female children, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who [REDACTED] alleged were repeatedly sexually molested by Jeffrey Epstein over a period of years. Epstein claims he had probable cause to file the claims against [REDACTED] in 2009 and that he had probable cause to continue pursuing those claims through the time when Epstein dismissed those claims in August 2012. + +Although Jeffrey Epstein sued [REDACTED] based, in part, on the allegation that the lawsuits were not well-founded, he has recently conceded that all of the lawsuits Attorney [REDACTED] filed on behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe were filed by [REDACTED] in good-faith. + +Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed the lawsuit against Attorney [REDACTED] in order to intimidate Mr. [REDACTED] into abandoning or cheaply compromising his clients' claims, and to intimidate the dozens of other victims who were pursuing claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. [REDACTED] further contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this suit out of malice for Mr. [REDACTED], who was coordinating much of the discovery being taken by all of the alleged underage victims, not just L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. Finally, Mr. [REDACTED] contends that Jeffrey Epstein filed this lawsuit to punish Attorney [REDACTED] for the lawsuit Attorney [REDACTED] filed against the federal government, in which Attorney [REDACTED], on behalf of his clients, sought to + +overturn the plea agreement Jeffrey Epstein had entered into with the federal government which in essence immunized Jeffrey Epstein from being federally prosecuted for the federal sex offenses the government had discovered had been committed against at least 40 minors.. + +Attorney defended against Epstein's lawsuit, challenging it on the rounds that it had no legal or factual support. Shortly before the Court was scheduled to rule on challenge, Epstein dismissed all of his claims against Attorney . Furthermore, Epstein allowed the statute of limitations to expire making it legally impossible for Epstein brim claims based on the conduct he sued upon in the original complaint. While Epstein claim for maliciouwasecution, Epstein has refused to answer any io validity of the civil claims prosecuted on behalfof L.M., E.W, and oe. bout the + +Finally, although Epstein claimed that the cases being pursued by L. "weak" and had "minimal value" and were only being pursued brought by participation in a criminal Ponzi scheme, Epstein ev for a total of \$5.5 million. d Jane Doe were in furtherance of ly settled the claims + +Your job as jurors will be to decide whether maliciously, and, V so whether and in what amou malicious claims brought against him by Jeffrey E sued was damaged by the + +If you decide that brought by Jeffrey Epstein, you will also award punitive damages against Jeffr in similar wrongdoing. as damaged by maliciously filed claims pon to consider whether it is appropriate to o punish him and to deter others from engaging + +# 201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES + +Judge/Court: I am the Judge. You may hear people occasionally refer to me as The Court." That is the formal name for my role. My job is to maintain order and dec. to apply the rules of the law to the trial. I will also explain various rules to you that d to know in order to do your job as the jury. It is my job to remain neutral on th issu this lawsuit. + +Parties: A party who files a lawsuit is called the Plainti that is sued is called the Defendant. + +Attorneys: The attorneys have the job of t eir clients. That is, they speak for their clients here at the trial. They have taken s aTtorncys to do their best and to follow the rules of their profession. + +Plaintiffs Counsel: The a and is the persLy b filed the claim in dispute. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. Mr. S nd his client will be referred to most of the time as "the plaintif. Mr. Scarola, will yt<6Clease introduce who is sitting at the table with you? AS eelis side of the courtroom, Jack Scarola, represents + +De ounsel: The attorney on this side of the courtroom, Scott Link, represents Jeffrey e one who has been sued. His job is to present his client's side of things to you. He and his client will usually be referred to here as "the defendant". Mr. Link, will you please introduce who is sitting at the table with you? + +Court Clerk:This person sitting in front of me, (name), is the court clerk. He/She is here to assist me with some of the mechanics of the trial process, including the numbering and collection of the exhibits that are introduced in the course of the trial. + +Court Reporter: The person sitting at the stenographic machine, (name), is the court reporter. His/Her job is to keep an accurate legal record of everything we say and do during this trial. + +Bailiff: The person over there, (name), is die bailiff. His/Her job is to mainta\* 4, order and security in the courtroom. The bailiff is also my representative to the jury. An gi need or any problems that come up for you during the course of the trial should t to him/her. However, the bailiff cannot answer any of your questions about the e. can do that. + +Jurv: Last, but not least, is the jury, which we will begi ect in a few moments from among all of you. The jury% job will be to decide what th and what the facts mean. Jurors should be as neutral as possible at this point jt rro fixed opinion about the lawsuit. + +In order to have a fair and lawful trial(, ere les that all jurors must follow. A basic rule is that jurors must decide the case o n %th evidence presented in the courtroom. You must not communicate with anyon • g friends and family members, about this case, the people and places involved, or service. You must not disclose your thoughts about this case or ask for advice on h ecide this case. + +I want to sr c that this rule means you must not use electronic devices or computers nicate about this case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, posting i o ion on a website or chat room, or any other means at all. Do not send or accept any messages to or from anyone about this case or your jury service. + +You must not do any research or look up words, names, maps, or anything else that may have anything to do with this case. This includes reading newspapers, watching television or using a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other means at all, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in this case. This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. + +Many of you may have cell phones, tablets, laptops or other electronic devices with you here in the courtroom. + +'You cannot have any cell phones, tablets, laptops, or other electronic devices in the courtroom. You may use these devices during recesses, but even then you may not e your cell phone or electronic device to find out any information about the case or i.4c mgra1i agate with anyone about the case or the people involved in the case. Do not to recordings or audio recordings of the proceedings or your fellow j phs, video e end of the case, while you are deliberating, you must not communicate with e outside the jury room. If someone needs to contact you in an emergency, the cou a e messages and deliver them to you without delay. A contact phone number wi ed to you. + +What are the reasons for these ml rules are imposed because jurors must decide the case without distraction and on t e evidence presented in the courtroom. If you investigate, research, or make in your own outside of the courtroom, the trial judge has no way to make sure that e i ormation you obtain is proper for the case. The parties likewise have no opportu dispute or challenge the accuracy of what you find. That is contrary to our j system, which assures every party the right to ask questions about and challenge a ce being considered against it and to present argument with respect to that evidence. dependent investigation by a juror unfairly and improperly prevents the parties from having that opportunity our judicial system promises. + +Any juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the entire trial process to start over. A mistrial is a tremendous expense and inconvenience to the parties, the court, and the taxpayers. If you violate + +Alternative B Instruction + +these rules, you may be held in contempt of court, and face sanctions, such as serving time in jail, paying a fine or both. + +All of your communications with courtroom personnel, or me, will be part of the record of these proceedings. That means those communications shall either be made in open urt with the court reporter present or, if they are in writing, the writing will be filed with co lerk. I have instructed the courtroom personnel that any communications you hav outside of my presence must be reported to me, and I will tell the parties and the' alto s about any communication from you that I believe may be of interest to th and their attorneys. + +However, you may communicate directly wit m personnel about matters concerning your comfort and safety, such as juror p tion of break areas, how and when to assemble for duty, dress, what personal ite rought into the courthouse or jury room. + +If you become aware of any vio of these instructions or any other instruction I give in this case, you must tell me by g to the bailiff. + +# 201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS + +The last thing I want to do, before we begin to select the jury, is to explain to you how the selection process works. + +Questions/Challenges: This is the part of the case where the parties and their lawyers have the opportunity to get to know a little bit about you, in order to help them com their own conclusions about your ability to be fair and impartial, so they can decide whcilS"think should be the jurors in this case. 0 + +How we go about that is as follows: First, I'll ask some gene tions of you. Then, each of the lawyers will have more specific questions that k of you. After they have asked all of their questions, I will meet with them an tell me their choices for jurors. Each side can ask that I exclude a person fro on a jury if they can give me a reason to believe that he or she might be unable to f tr and impartial. That is what is called a challenge for cause. The lawyers a challenges, by which they may person from the jury without giving a reason. By this process of elimination, th mainmg persons are selected as the jury. It may take more than one conference among arti their attorneys, and me before the final selections are made. certain number of what are called peremptory + +Pu os e onina : The questions that you will be asked during this process are not intended to e HIRtSss you or unnecessarily pry into your personal affairs, but it is important that the parties their attorneys know enough about you to make this important decision. If a question is asked that you would prefer not to answer in front of the whole courtroom, just let me know and you can come up here and give your answer just in front of the attorneys and me. If you have a question of either the attorneys or me, don't hesitate to let me know. + +Response to Questioning: There are no right or wrong answers to the questions that will be asked of you. The only thing that I ask is that you answer the questions as frankly and as honestly and as completely as you can. You will take an oath to answer all questions truthfully and completely and you must do so. Remaining silent when you have information you should disclose is a violation of that oath as well. If a juror violates this oath, it not only may result in having to try the case all over again but also can result in civil a criminal penalties against a juror personally. So, again, it is very important that you as st and complete with your answers as you possibly can. If you don't understa ne lipon, sti please raise your hand and ask for an explanation or clarification. C ) + +In sum, this is a process to assist the parties and their att eys to select a fair and impartial jury. All of the questions they ask you are for this purpose, reason, you do not think you can be a fair and impartial juror, you must tell us. + +# 202.1 INTRODUCTION + +You have now taken an oath to serve as jurors in this trial. Before we begin, I am going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to this case and let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +It is my intention to give you some of the rules of law but it might be wt t know for sure all of the law that will apply in this case until all of the evidence d. However, I can anticipate most of the law and give it to you at the beginning f the so that you will better understand what to be looking for while the evidence • nted. If I later decide that different or additional law applies to the case, I will . any event, at the end of the evidence I will give you the final instructions on w c o ust base your verdict. At that time, you will have a complete written set of the so you do not have to memorize what I am about to tell you. + +The following are the rul w pected to apply in this case. + +[READ RELE STRUCTIONS BEGINNING AT PG. 28] + +r qc S + +# 202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE + +Now that you have heard the law, I want to let you know what you can expect as the trial proceeds. + +Opening Statements: In a few moments, the attorneys will each have a chance t ake what are called opening statements. In an opening statement, an attorney is allowed 'ye his/her views about what the evidence will be in the trial and what you are likely d hear in the testimony. + +Evidentiary Phase: After the attorneys' opening stat witnesses and evidence to you. C.) e plaintiffs will bring their + +Evidence: Evidence is the information that ows you to see or hear in deciding this case. Evidence includes the testimony of ses, documents, and anything else that I instruct you to consider. + +Witnesses: A witness is a n o takes an oath to tell the truth and then answers attorneys' questions for the ju h answering of attorneys' questions by witnesses is called "giving testimony." Test'ry means statements that are made when someone has sworn an oath to tell the t + +Thee,' lawyer will normally question the witness first. That is called direct examinaa Y en the defense lawyer may ask the same witness additional questions about whatever the witness has testified to. That is called cross-examination. Certain documents or other evidence may also be shown to you during direct or cross-examination. After the plaintiffs' witnesses have testified, the defendant will have the opportunity to put witnesses on the stand and go through the same process. Then the plaintiffs' lawyer gets to do crossexamination. The process is designed to be fair to both sides. + +It is important that you remember that testimony come from witnesses. The attorneys do not give testimony and they are not themselves witnesses. + +Objections: Sometimes the attorneys will disagree about the rules for trial procedure when a question is asked of a witness. When that happens, one of the lawyers may make w t is called an "objection." The rules for a trial can be complicated, and there are many reason omeys to object. You should simply wait for me to decide how to proceed. If I t objection is "sustained", that means the witness may not answer the question. If say t the objection is "overruled", that means the witness may answer the question. + +When there is an objection and I make a decision, of assume from that decision that I have any particular opinion other than that the nducting a trial are being correctly followed. If I say a question may not be ask or red, you must not try to guess what the answer would have been. That is against les, oo. + +Side Bar Conferences: Som I I need to speak to the attorneys about legal elements of the case that are not appropri for he jury to hear. The attorneys and I will try to have as few of these conferences as po hile you are giving us your valuable time in the courtroom. But, if we do have to har,GZ ich a conference during testimony, we will try to hold the conference at the side of my at we do not have to take a break and ask you to leave the courtroom. + +Breaks in an ongoing trial are usually called "recesses". During a recess you still have your duties as a juror and must follow the rules, even while having coffee, at lunch, or at home. + +Instructions Before Closing Arguments: After all the evidence has been presented to you, I will instruct you on the law that you must follow. It is important that you remember these instructions to assist you in evaluating the final attorney presentations, which come next, and later, during your deliberations, to help you correctly sort through the evidence to reach your decision. + +Closing Arguments: The attorneys will then have the opportunity to make their final presentations to you, which are called closing arguments. + +Final Instructions: After you have heard the closing arguments, I will instruct you further in the law as well as explain to you the procedures you must follow to decide the case. + +Deliberations: After you hear the final jury instructions, you will go to t ur om and discuss and decide the questions I have put on your verdict form. You will gpy of the jury instructions to use during your discussions. The discussions you have nd the cisions you make are usually called "jury deliberations." Your deliberations are ajtSlllKely private and neither I nor anyone else will be with you in the jury room. + +Verdict: When you have finished answerin q ions, you will give the verdict form to the bailiff, and we will all return to the co is completed, you will be released from ment as a jury. \r ere your verdict will be read. When that + +Finally, before we begin the ant to give you just a brief explanation of rules you must follow as the case proceed4, + +Keeping an Open You must pay close attention to the testimony and other evidence as it co anyone else keep an o to the trial. However, you must avoid forming any final opinion or telling s on the case until you begin your deliberations. This rule requires you to nd until you have heard all of the evidence and is designed to prevent you from influencing how your fellow jurors think until they have heard all of the evidence and had an opportunity to form their own opinions. The time and place for coining to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and I have instructed you on the law. It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything. + +Consider Only the Evidence: It is the things you hear and see in this courtroom that matter in this trial. The law tells us that a juror can consider only the testimony and other evidence that all the other jurors have also heard and seen in the presence of the judge and the lawyers. Doing anything else is wrong and is against the law. That means that you must not do any work or investigation of your own about the case. You must not o t ,your own any information about the case or about anyone involved in the ca ny source whatsoever. This includes reading newspapers, watching televisio a computer, cell phone, the Internet, any electronic device, or any other mea 1, to get information related to this case or the people and places involved in t . This applies whether you are in the courthouse, at home, or anywhere else. o not visit places mentioned in the trial or use the internet to look at maps or p ee any place discussed during trial. + +Do not provide any information t this'case to anyone, including friends or family members. Do not let anyone, incl osest family members, make comments to you or ask questions about the trial. Just not have discussions of any sort with friends or family members about the case o ople and places involved. So, do not let even the closest family members make c ts to you or ask questions about the trial. In this age of electronic communic ti %,+nt to stress again that just as you must not talk about this case face-to-face, you mus o k about this case by using an electronic device. You must not use phones, tablets, computers or other electronic devices to communicate. Do not send or accept any messages related to this case or your jury service. Do not discuss this case or ask for advice by any means at all, including posting information on an Internet website, chat room or blog. + +No Mid-Trial Discussions: When we are in a recess, do not discuss anything about the trial or the case with each other or with anyone else. If attorneys approach you, don't speak with them. The law says they are to avoid contact with you. If an attorney will not look at you or speak to you, do not be offended or form a conclusion about that behavior. The attorney is not supposed to interact with jurors outside of the courtroom and is only following the rules. The attorney is not being impolite. If an attorney or anyone else does try to speak with you or says something about the case in your presence, please inform the bailiff immediately. + +Only the Jury Decides: Only you get to deliberate and answer the ve the end of the trial. I will not intrude into your deliberations at all. I am :lui stions at o be neutral. You should not assume that I prefer one decision over another. You srioul try to guess what my opinion is about any part of the case. It would be wrong jaf s30 — to conclude that anything I i , say or do means that I am for one side or another in the s a 1 ssing and deciding the facts is your job alone. + +r + +C + +— + +II ZPIIIV + +# 202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS + +If you would like to take notes during the trial, you may do so. On the other hand, of course, you are not required to take notes if you do not want to. That will be left up to you individually. + +You will be provided with a note pad and a pen for use if you wish to take not Any notes that you take will be for your personal use. However, you should not take them m the courtroom. During recesses, the bailiff will take possession of your notes n i turn them to you when we reconvene. After you have completed your deliberatio the ?Mc will deliver your notes to me. They will be destroyed. No one will ever read you . + +If you take notes, do not get so involved in note-ta ou become distracted from the proceedings. Your notes should be used only as ai emory. + +o Whether or not you take notes, you sh n your memory of the evidence and you should not be unduly influenced by the er jurors. Notes are not entitled to any greater weight than each juror's memory O o + +A S i ller + +'....) + +questioning of the witness, you should raise your h You also may have a question you think should be ask witness. If so, there is a way for you to request that I ask the witness a question. Aft omeys have completed their ave a question. I will then give you sufficient time to write the question on a piec p , fold it, and give it to the bailiff, who will pass it to me. Do not put your name on esti n, show it to anyone or discuss it with anyone. + +# 202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS + +# Questions for the court or courtroom personnel: + +During the trial, you may have a question about these proceedings. If so, please write it down and hand it to the bailiff, who will then hand it to me. I will review your quest' cn with the parties, and their attorneys, before responding. + +# Questions for witnesses: + +g + +I will then review the qu the attorneys. Under our law, only certain evidence may be considered by a jury in mg a verdict. You are bound by the same rules of evidence that control the attorneys' ns. If I decide that the question may not be asked under our rules of evidence, I wil ou. Otherwise, I will direct the question to the witness. The attorneys may then ask f I. . uestions if they wish. If there are additional questions from jurors, we will follow th procedure again. + +By providing this procedure, I do not mean to suggest that you must or should submit written questions for witnesses. In most cases, the lawyers will have asked the necessary questions. + +# 301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED TESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS + +# a. Deposition or prior testimony: + +Members of the jury, the sworn testimony of (name), given before trial, w'11 now be presented. You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would any othe c in the case. + +# 0 b. Interrogatories: + +Members of the jury, answers to interrogatories will now d ou. Interrogatories are written questions that have been presented before trial by e another. They are answered under oath. You are to consider and weigh these u S So , S.a , answers as you would any other evidence in the case. + +# c. Stipulated testimony: + +Members of the jury, the p ''ICLIN.I.Yagreed that if (name of witness) were called as a witness, he/she would testify (r or cribe the testimony). You are to consider and weigh this testimony as you would an evidence in the case. + +# d. Stipulations + +Mem true. (R e jury, the parties have agreed to certain facts. You must accept these facts as eed facts). + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded that had a good faith basis to file all of the civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. By conceding that all of the lawsuits were filed in good-faith, Jeffrey Epstein has not conceded that he in fact committed an of the alleged acts against L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, only that had a good-faith basis to reasonably believe that Jeffrey Epstein had in fact committed the alleged acts. As to whether in fact he committed the alleged acts, Jeffrey Epstein has asserted his 5" Amendment right to remain silent. + +# e. Admissions: + +# 1. Applicable to all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted the facts.) You must accept these facts as true. (Read the admissions). + +# 2. Applicable to fewer than all parties: + +Members of the jury, (identify the party or parties that have admitted th ). You must accept these facts as true in deciding the issues between (identify the a Cidsed es), but these facts should not be used in deciding the issues between (identify the un ed parties). (Read the admissions). + +I'S) + +## 301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received in evidence. Witnesses may testify about or refer to this or any other item of evidence during the remainder of the trial. This and all other items received in evidence will be available to you for examination during your d\_eliberations at the end of the trial. + +CO iS 4)9 ? S" ricS '714r Nis) + +## 301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS + +The (describe item of evidence) has been received in evidence. It is being shown to you now to help you understand the testimony of this witness and other witnesses in the case, as well as the evidence as a whole. You may examine (describe item of evidence) briefly now. It will also be available to you for examination during your deliberations at the end of the trialAs, + +CO + +# 301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS + +# a. Generally: + +This witness will be using (identify demonstrative or visual aid(s)) to assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. The testimony of the witness is evidence; however, th (identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the case ived in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. Only items vidence will be available to you for consideration during your deliberations. + +# b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids base ted assumptions: + +This witness will be using (identify demons o assist in explaining or illustrating his/her testimony. These items have been p assist this witness in explaining his/her testimony. They may be based on assum you are free to accept or reject. The testimony of the witness is evidence; howev identify demonstrative or visual aids) are not to be considered as evidence in the a less received in evidence, and should not be used as a substitute for evidence. On t s received in evidence will be available to you for consideration during your deli + ++0 + +### **301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE** + +The (describe item of evidence) has now been received into evidence. It has been admitted only for the purpose of (describe purpose) as to (name party). You may consider it only for that purpose as it might affect (name party). You may not consider that evidence for any other purpose as to any other party. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +#### **406.1 INTRODUCTION** + +Members of the jury, you have now heard and received all of the evidence in this case. I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that you must use in reaching your verdict. You will recall at the beginning of the case I told you that if, at the end of the case I decided that different law applies, I would tell you so. These instructions are (slightly) different from what I gave you at the beginning and it is these rules of law that you must now follow. When I finish telling you about the rules of law, the attorneys will present their final arguments and you will then retire to decide your verdict. + +NOT A CERTIFIED CCPY + +# 406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS + +The claims in this case for your consideration are as follows: + +claims that Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause filed and continued to prosecute a lawsuit against Mr. I . That lawsuit alleged that Epstein was injured by Mr. commission of various criminal acts while pu a r cated or exaggerated sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf oft c According to the lawsuit Jeffrey Epstein filed against Mr. , Mr. e claims solely as part of Mr. knowing participation in an illegal Po icy ' e with Scott Rothstein. Mr. claims that he was damaged by the false an dt a i claims that Mr. Epstein filed A\ against him. + +Jeffrey Epstein denies that claim. + +The parties must prove all clai def es by the greater weight of the evidence. I will now define some of the terns yco n deciding this case. + +A S tily + +'...) + +### **406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE** + +"Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## 406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE + +Probable cause means that at the time of instituting the civil proceeding against , the facts and circumstances known to Jeffrey Epstein were sufficiently strong to support a reasonable belief that the claims made by Jeffrey Epstein against supported by existing facts. Azc + +In order for probable cause to exist on the part of Jeffrey Epstein, r own to Jeffrey Epstein must be such that a prudent man would set in motion the filin of civil lawsuit. Where, however, it would appear to a cautious man that further inv is justified before filing the civil lawsuit, then the failure to perform that additional'qvi atj. may form the basis to conclude that such person lacked probable cause to file the + +Authority: Liabos v. Harman, 215 So. ( S -90 y (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) + +C /C) + +# 406.5 LEGAL MALICE + +One acts with legal malice in instituting or continuing a civil proceeding against another if he does so for the primary purpose of injuring the other, or recklessly and without regard for whether the proceeding is justified, or for any primary purpose except to establish what he 2;\_=\_ or she considers to be a meritorious claim. In determining whether Jeffrey Epstein-a4ed 2.\* ) maliciously, you may consider all the circumstances at the time of the corTdhe mplained of, including any lack of probable cause to institute or continue the pr ceedi + +2 Durkin v. =, 814 So.2d 1246, 1248 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("As to malice on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff need not allege actual malice; legal malice is sufficient and may be inferred from, among other things, a lack of probable cause, gross negligence, or great indifference to persons, property, or the rights of others. Hcrc, the allegations supporting a lack of probable cause arc evidence from which a jury could infer malice.") (emphasis added) + +#### **406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING** + +One is regarded as having instituted a civil proceeding against another if the proceeding resulted directly and in natural and continuous sequence from his actions, so that it reasonably can be said that, but for his actions, the proceeding would not have been instituted. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## 406.7 LEGAL CAUSE + +#### a. Legal cause generally: + +The malicious institution of a proceeding is a cause of loss, injury, or damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage, so that it can reasonably be said that, but for the malicio inftution of a proceeding, the loss, injury, or damage would not have occurred. + +### b. Concurring cause: + +CO + +In order to be regarded as a legal cause of loss, inju • age the malicious institution of such a proceeding need not be the only cause. The 'c eistitution of a proceeding may be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage even t o erates in combination with the act of tn,\ " eak another or some other cause if the maliciou itut n of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or da + +### c. Intervening cause: + +The maliciou, insti ti n of a proceeding may also be a legal cause of loss, injury, or damage even t perates in combination with the act of another, some natural cause, or some oth a jccuring after the malicious institution of a proceeding occurs if such other cause was If reasonably foreseeable and the malicious institution of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing such loss, injury, or damage or the resulting loss, injury, or damage was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the malicious institution of a proceeding and the malicious institution of a proceeding contributes substantially to producing it. + +# 406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM + +The issues you must decide on =II claim against Jeffrey Epstein are whether Jeffrey Epstein maliciously and without probable cause either instituted or continued a civil proceeding against which later terminated in f or of and, if so, whether that action was a legal cause of loss, in' ll , .i age to + +CO + +# 406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM + +I f the greater weight of the evidence does not support should be for Jeffrey Epstein. claim, your verdict + +However, if the greater weight of the evidence supports Epstein either: MI' claim that Jeffrey + +- Maliciously and without probable cause initiated a civil proc gainst or +- Maliciously and without probable cause continued a civ or +- Maliciously and without proceeding against probable mute both initiated and continued a civil Edwar + +then your verdict should be for Ed \ an against Jeffrey Epstein. + +# 406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES + +If you find for Jeffrey Epstein, you will not consider the matter of damages. But, if you find for , you should award an amount of money that the greater weight of the evidence shows will fairly and adequately compen te for such loss, injury, or damage as the greater weight of the ev• ce ws was caused by the institution of the proceeding complained of. q + +If you fmd for damage: • you shall consider the follow + +# COMPENSATORY DAMAGES + +#### 4 1C a. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, guish, hurt feelings: + +Any injury to reputation and any s experienced in the past or to be experie compensation to be awarded on acco just in the light of the evidence. iliation, mental anguish, and hurt feelings future. There is no exact standard for fixing the elements of damage. Any award should be fair and + +# b. Loss of Capacity for th ent of Life. + +Any loss of cape the enjoyment of life experienced in the past or to be experienced in the future. There • o ex t standard for measuring such damage. The amount should be fair and just in the light o t vidence. + +# c. en lost fimeshown: + +nable value of any time lost in the past in defending against Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit. + +## AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE + +In order to recover damages for a particular type of loss or harm, must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that such loss or harm was caused by Jeffrey Epstein's wrongful conduct. If ,proves the Aar occurrence of such loss or harm by the greater weight of the e Al • ence, is entitled to recover for that loss or harm even thoug , iii. -i et amount of that loss or harm cannot be determined. + +Thus, if you find by the greater weight of the e ' e that a particular type of loss or harm did occur as a result of Jeffrey t • ' wrongful conduct, is entitled to recover for that loss long as there is some reasonable yardstick by which it can be measure , as long as there is some reasonable basis for estimating or approxima ount of the loss or harm. may not be denied damages y cause the amount of loss or harm is uncertain or difficult to determine. Any f uncertainty concerning the computation of damages t is instead borne by Je rEpstein. + +Author n v. Pension Services Corp., 389 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Ada usd Interstate Dev. Corp., 352 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977): John Ilanco t Ins. Co. v. Mark-A. Inc., 324 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Conner v. Atlas ircraft Corp. 310 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Asgrow-Kilgore co. v. Mulford Hickerson Corp., 301 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1974); Saporito v. Bone, 195 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hollywood Golf Estates, 324 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. Fla. 1965); McCall v. Sherbill, 68 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1953); Twyman v. Roell, 123 Fla. 2, 166 So. 215 (1936); Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co., 282 U.S. 555, 563 (1931). + +Maslenjak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1918, 1929 (2017) citing Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures. Inc., 327 U.S. 251, 265 (1946) ("The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require that the wrongdoer shall bear the risk of the uncertainty which his own wrong has created")). + +### **503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES — BIFURCATED PROCEDURE3** + +*a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:* + +There is an additional claim in this case that you must decide. If you find for [REDACTED] and against Jeffrey Epstein, you must decide whether, in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages are warranted as punishment to Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. + +The trial of the punitive damages issue is divided into two parts. In this first part, you will decide whether the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein is such that punitive damages are warranted. If you decide that punitive damages are warranted, we will proceed to the second part of that issue during which the parties may present additional evidence and argument on the issue of punitive damages. I will then give you additional instructions, after which you will decide whether, in your discretion, punitive damages will be assessed and, if so, the amount. + +*b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:* + +[REDACTED] claims that punitive damages should be awarded against Jeffrey Epstein for his conduct in filing a lawsuit against [REDACTED] Edwards with malice and in the absence of probable cause. Punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein if you find by clear and convincing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which was a substantial cause of loss, injury, or damage to [REDACTED]. Under those circumstances you may, in your discretion, award punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein. If clear and convincing evidence does not show such conduct by Jeffrey Epstein, punitive damages are not warranted against Jeffrey Epstein. + +"Intentional misconduct" means that Jeffrey Epstein had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and there was a high probability of injury or damage to [REDACTED] and, despite that knowledge, he intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. "Gross negligence" means that Jeffrey Epstein's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"Clear and convincing evidence" differs from the "greater weight of the evidence" in that it is more compelling and persuasive. As I have already instructed you, "greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +*c. Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure:* + +*c(1). Opening instruction, second stage:* + +Members of the jury, I am now going to tell you about the rules of law that apply to determining whether punitive damages should be assessed and, if so, in what amount. When I finish with these instructions, the parties will present additional evidence. You should consider this additional evidence along with the evidence already presented, and you should decide any disputed factual issues by the greater weight of the evidence. "Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. + +--- + +3 Instructions 503.1b(1)-b(4) are designed for use in most common-law tort cases. However, certain types of intentional torts may require a punitive damage charge appropriate to the particular tort. See, e.g., First Interstate Development Corp. v. Ablanedo, 511 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1987); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. McCarson, 467 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1985). The same may be true when punitive damages are authorized by statute. See, e.g., Home Insurance Co. v. [REDACTED], 573 So.2d 343, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). + +### d. Closing instruction, second stage: + +## c(2). Punitive damages — determination of amount: + +You are to decide the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be assessed as punishment against Jeffrey Epstein and as a deterrent to others. This amount would be in addition to the compensatory damages you have previously awarded. In making this determination, you should consider the following: + +(A). the nature, extent and degree of misconduct and the related circumstances, including the following: + +a i an I. wh t f loss, injury, or damage, Jeffrey Epste l specific and the conduct of Jeffrey Epstei in ct harm + +C + +O + +However, you may not award an amount that would fi Ily destroy Jeffrey Epstein. + +(B). The financial resources of Jeffrey Epstein. + +You may in your discretion decline to assess p 4\II es. + +4 Members of the jury, you have now heard andheceived all of the •ue of punitive damages. Your verdict on the issues raisedby the pun i t ive damages claim o against Jeffrey Epstein must be based on the evidence that has been received during the tnao e rspase of this case and on the evidence that has been ivied in these proceedings and the law on which I have instructed you. In reaching your verdict, you not tq be swayed from the performance of your duty by prejudice or sympathy for or against any party. + +Your verdict must be i ous, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. + +You will be a form of verdict, which I shall now read to you: + +When y u ha agreed on your verdict, the or forewoman, acting for the jury, should date and sign th ou may now retire to consider your verdict. + +## 601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE + +In deciding this case, it is your duty as jurors to decide the issues, and only those issues, that I submit for your determination by answering certain questions I ask you to answer on a special form, called a verdict form. You must come to an agreement about what your Your agreed-upon answers to my questions are called your jury verdict. rs will be. + +The evidence in this case consists of the sworn testimony of th received in evidence and all facts that were admitted or agreed to b which the court instructs you to accept. all exhibits es and any fact of + +In reaching your verdict, you must think ab eigh the testimony and any documents, photographs, or other material that a ceived in evidence. You may also consider any facts that were admitted or aged the lawyers. Your job is to determine what the facts are. You may use reasorryrn1comdion sense to reach conclusions. You may draw reasonable inferences from the e covered here. And, you must a ut you should not guess about things that were not apply the law as I have explained it to you. + +A S IC?\* + +# 601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES + +Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; th \*ntelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the c cz • t e ans and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witnes fr the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testi the ability of the reasonableness of the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of al idence in the case and in the light of your own experience and commons sense. + +You have heard opinion testimony on cert tsubjects from persons referred to as expert witnesses. + +You may accept such opinion considering the knowledge, skill, by the witness for the opinion e (\n S, ject it, or give it the weight you think it deserves, training, or education of the witness, the reasons given and all the other evidence in the case. + +NJ + +## ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT + +An individual is constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from being compelled to provide evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding and guilt of a crime may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. However, the prohibition against drawing an adverse inference that applies in a criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil lawsuit. + +Therefore, if you fmd that Jeffrey Epstein refused to answer questions wh onfiijrtted with relevant evidence against him on the ground that his answers may tend to in m e him, then you may, but are not required to, infer that his answers would have incriminat this, together with the other evidence, in determining the issues of this ut Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein cannot rest solely on the adverse inference. may consider + +Authority: Fla. St. Jury Ins. 301.11a; Baxter v. Palmigiano 308 (1976); Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, No. 10-60786-cv-2012 WL 4 Fla. Sept. 28, 2012). + +# FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404 + +Federal Rule of Evidence 415 and Florida Statute 90.404 provide that in a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault or child molestation, the Court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault or child molestation. + +A As a consequence of these provisions in both federal and state la per pretrial discovery by in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Eps limited to the investigation of the offenses alleged to have been committed by Jeffre n against the three clients represented by The law express! to conduct discovery of and to fully investigate any other sexual as d molestation which may have been committed by Jeffrey Epstein. + +## NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES + +Jeffrey Epstein has conceded and does not dispute that he filed the Complaint at issue against LM, Scott Rothstein, and on December 7, 2009, and he continued to prosecute claims against 16, 2012. until he voluntarily dismissed those claims kAugust + +In determining what Jeffrey Epstein's intention was at the time he prosecuted claims against the law presumes that he intended then I and probable consequences of his acts. Accordingly, if you find that Jeffrey filed and prosecuted false claims against then he is presumed to h d to file and prosecute false claims, unless that presumption is rebutted by other + +## LITIGATION PRIVILEGES + +The law does not allow a separate lawsuit to be based on conduct that occurs in and is related to another legal proceeding. That protection, called the "litigation privilege" does not prevent the application of other remedies such as contempt of court proceedings, the filing of professional grievances, or prosecution for perjury, but lawsuits for damages are not allowed. + +In his lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein alleged tha engaged in discovery in the cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., an• Doe, including the noticing of certain depositions, that was improper and a ti ffrey Epstein to spend money on attorney's fees to defend against that • ' Jeffrey Epstein claims that these monies constitute damages that era le in his independent lawsuit against + +However, if the investigation calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible e claims being pursued by L.M., E.W. and Jane D potential claims for unitive damages aga conducted by was relev, by absolute immunity. in was reasonably arding any part of the g but not limited to their pstein, then the discovery se proceedings and is protected + +Thus, if you find that the discov the potential claims being pu Jeffrey Epstein could not to recover any absolutely barred by Flori en by was relevant to s three clients, then you must also fmd that e an independent lawsuit against mages for attorney's fees, as those claims were ligation privilege. + +4 Echevarria, McCalla, Rayner, & Frappicr v. 950 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla. 2007) ("In Myers v. Hodges 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357 (1907), this Court recognized c principle of the litigation privilege in Florida, essentially providing legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings. In that case, involving a libel suit based on statements contained in a complaint, this Court established a qualified litigation privilege, requiring that the alleged defamatory statements be relevant to the judicial proceeding. ...Under our holding, once this threshold showing was met, the statements were entitled to immunity."). + +## JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FAILURE TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL) + +The failure of Jeffrey Epstein to appear or testify as to material facts within his knowledge creates an inference that he refrained from appearing or testifying + +because the truth, if revealed, would not be favorable to him. O C iS 5) + +5 See Geiger v. Mather of Lakeland. Inc. 217 So. 2d 897, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968) ("It is a general rule that the failure of a party to appear or testify as to material facts within his knowledge crcatcs an inference that he refrained from appearing or testifying because the truth, if made to appear, would not aid his contention . .. This appears to be the clear weight of authority throughout the country."). + +## THE SWORD-SHIELD DOCTRINEE + +Under Florida law, Jeffrey Epstein is not permitted to file a civil proceeding against and then invoke a privilege to avoid discovery on the claims made by Jeffrey Epstein against in that civil proceeding. + +An issue you are deciding in this case is whether Jeffrey Epstein i and continued claims against in the absence of pro . If you find that Jeffrey Epstein was asked to provide information abou ver probable cause he may have had, and rather than provide that i he instead refused to answer relevant questions, then you are are not required, to infer that Jeffrey Epstein's answers would hav\_e4e verse to his position and would have demonstrated a lack of probable + +C4 SLe + +6Sec DcPalma v. DcPalma 538 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) ("It is well settled in this district that a person may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the fifth amendment to avoid giving discovery, using the fifth amendment as both a `sword and a shield.'"). + +## JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FAILURE TO RAISE ADVICE OF COUNSEL AS A DEFENSE' + +Jeffrey Epstein had the option in this case of claiming that, after he provided his attorney with a full and complete disclosure of all the facts known to Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney advised him to institute the civil proceeding against This defense, called "advice of counsel," would have been a complete def s to malicious prosecution action. + +O S + +Jeffrey Epstein, however, chose not to raise this defense and fail>l all any of his attorneys as a witness in support of his defense to ey dwards' malicious prosecution claim. The failure of Jeffrey Epst t testimony of his own attorneys who are within his control and w have knowledge of facts at issue justifies an adverse inference against Jig s, \ E . + +You therefore may, but a not ired to, infer that Jeffrey Epstein failed to call his attorneys beca his a orneys' testimony would have been unfavorable to Jeffrey Epste clai that Jeffrey Epstein had probable cause to initiate the civil + +ac Psulksaszyn,th, 106 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958) ("As mentioned above, defendant alleged that the perjury prosecution against plaintiff was instituted upon advice of counsel. Such is a complete dcfcnsc to an action for malicious prosecution; however, such advice of counsel must be based upon a full and complete disclosure of all the filets."). See Tri-State Systems. Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 500 So. 2d 212,215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ("[T]he failure of a party to present the testimony of a person within his control who has knowledge of the fact at issue justifies an inference adverse to that party."); sec also Haliburton v. State 561 So. 2d 248, 250 (Fla. 1990). McLaughlin v. Union-Leader Corp., 99 N.H. 492, 498 (N.H. 1955) (affirming trial court's ruling permitting counsel to comment on the opposing party's failure to call its attorney in defense of the claims). + +## 601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT) + +That is the law you must follow in deciding this case. The attorneys for the parties will now present their final arguments. When they are through, I will have a few final instructions about your deliberations. + +04 + +# SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS + +Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the closing arguments of the attorneys. You will shortly retire to the jury room to decide this case. Before you do so, I have a fe last instructions for you. + +During deliberations, jurors must communicate about the case 't one another and only when all jurors are present in the jury room. You will have in t room all of the evidence that was received during the trial. In reaching yo n, do not do any research on your own or as a group. Do not use dictionaries, or any other reference materials. Do not investigate the case or condu oiSn , xperiments. Do not visit or view the scene of any event involved in this case or oo t aps or pictures on the Internet. If you happen to pass by the scene, do not estigate. All jurors must see or hear the same evidence at the same time. Do of tsten to, or watch any news accounts of this trial. + +You are not to c unicate with any person outside the jury about this case. Until you have reached a ve • you \*lust not talk about this case in person or through the telephone, writing, or el \*c c unication, such as a blog, twitter, e-mail, text message, or any other means. o n act anyone to assist you, such as a family accountant, doctor, or lawyer. These co nications rules apply until I discharge you at the end of the case. + +If you become aware of any violation of these instructions or any other instruction I have given in this case, you must tell me by giving a note to the bailiff. + +Any notes you have taken during the trial may be taken to the jury room for use during your discussions. Your notes are simply an aid to your own memory, and neither your notes nor those of any other juror are binding or conclusive. Your notes are not a substitute for your own + +memory or that of other jurors. Instead, your verdict must result from the collective memory and judgment of all jurors based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial. + +At the conclusion of the trial, the bailiff will collect all of your notes and immediately destroy them. No one will ever read your notes. + +In reaching your verdict, do not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, public op n any other sentiment for or against any party to influence your decision. Your st be based on the evidence that has been received and the law on which I have i you. + +Reaching a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot p to in that decision in any way and you should not guess what I think your verdict o Id rom something I may have said or done. You should not think that I prefer o er another. Therefore, in reaching your verdict, you should not consi g that I have said or done, except for my specific instructions to you. + +Pay careful attention to al ctions that I gave you, for that is the law that you must follow. You will have a c y o my instructions with you when you go to the jury room to deliberate. All the inst s are important, and you must consider all of them together. There are no oth s that apply to this case, and even if you do not agree with these laws, you must in reaching your decision in this case. + +ou go to the jury room, the first thing you should do is choose a presiding juror to act as a foreperson during your deliberations. The foreperson should see to it that your discussions are orderly and that everyone has a fair chance to be heard. + +It is your duty to talk with one another in the jury room and to consider the views of all the jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you have considered the evidence with the other members of the jury. Feel free to change your mind if you are convinced that your position should be different. You should all try to agree. But do not give up your + +honest beliefs just because the others think differently. Keep an open mind so that you and your fellow jurors can easily share ideas about the case. I will give you a verdict form with questions you must answer. I have already instructed you on the law that you are to use in answering these questions. You must follow my instructions and the form carefully. ou must consider each question separately. Please answer the questions in the order the After cliC, you answer a question, the form tells you what to do next. I will now rea o you: (read form of verdict) + +You will be given (state number) forms of verdict, why all now read to you: (read form of verdict) + +If you fmd for your ve tem the following form: (read form of verdict) + +If you fmd for Jeffrey Epstein, ve t will be in the following form: (read form of verdict) + +da( ') Your verdict must be u tit us, that is, your verdict must be agreed to by each of you. When you have a our verdict and finished filling out the form, your foreperson must write the da d sign it at the bottom and return the verdict to the bailiff. + +If qrt need to communicate with me for any reason, write me a note and give it In your note, do not disclose any vote or split or the reason for the communication. You may now retire to decide your verdict. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +Plaintiff, + +THSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +## VERDICT FOR + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +- (1) Did Jeffrey Epstein initiate or maliciously and without probabl civil claim against + +Yes + +A + +Goes + +If your answer is No' dress question (2) below. If however, your answer is 'Yes', please proceed to qu )-(4 + +e amount of damage, if any, sustained by to his reputation ame, humiliation, mental anguish and hurt feelings, as a consequence of doing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +- (3) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by for loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? + +- (4) What is the amount of damage, if any, sustained by past, as a consequence of the wrongdoing by Jeffrey Epstein? for lost time in the + +ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Second Amended Proposed Jury Instmctions and Verdict Form + +Page 55 of 56 + +(5) Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that punitive damages are warranted against Jeffrey Epstein? + +Yes No + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +#### VERDICT FOR + +Please answer each of the following questions: + +CO SA + +- (1) What is the total amount of pun ages, if any, which you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, should,ge as against Jeffrey Epstein? + +If you elect not to assess pu tivc da es against Jeffrey Epstein, you should enter a zero (0) as the amount of damages, and sign and da erdict form. + +[If you have elec remaining quest damages agai 'ssess punitive damages against Jeffrey Epstein then you should skip the gn and date the verdict form. If, however, you have elected to assess punitive y stein, then you should answer the following questions:] + +to harm Bra ey A e time of loss, injury, or damage to and did the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein in fact harm did Jeffrey Eialha tsicific intent + +Yes No \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0a1d76f870dd02bee5e3a27e9f73a1186cbd7e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898/EFTA02768898.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,3619 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768898.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 56, + "chars": 73068, + "elapsed_seconds": 19.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 104.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 104.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECON AMENDED PROPOSED JURY \nINSTRUCTIONS AND RD1CT FORM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 520.9752197265625, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 520.9752197265625, + 360.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 85.06800000000001, + 360.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 351.1312561035156, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 351.1312561035156, + 108.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 108.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 410.04, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 106.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 287.02799999999996, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 133.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.2 INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR ROLES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 456.2299499511719, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 456.2299499511719, + 177.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 177.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "201.3 EXPLANATION OF THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 390.5961608886719, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 390.5961608886719, + 107.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 107.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 208.7435302734375, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 208.7435302734375, + 121.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 121.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.2 EXPLANATION OF THE TRIAL PROCEDURE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.6488952636719, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.6488952636719, + 122.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 122.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.3 NOTE-TAKING BY JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.6242370605469, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 278.6242370605469, + 122.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 122.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "202.4 JUROR QUESTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 235.7816162109375, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 235.7816162109375, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for the court or courtroom personnel:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 313.32672119140625, + 133.65 + ], + [ + 313.32672119140625, + 150.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 150.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Questions for witnesses:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 194.66058349609375, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 194.66058349609375, + 288.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 288.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.1 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, INTERROGATORIES, STIPULATED \nTESTIMONY, STIPULATIONS, AND ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 541.7467041015625, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 541.7467041015625, + 136.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 136.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Deposition or prior testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 245.98403930664062, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 245.98403930664062, + 176.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 176.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "0 b. Interrogatories:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 265.405029296875 + ], + [ + 435.44500732421875, + 265.405029296875 + ], + [ + 435.44500732421875, + 283.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 283.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Stipulated testimony:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 202.88482666015625, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 202.88482666015625, + 421.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 421.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Stipulations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 531.8624877929688 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 531.8624877929688 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e. Admissions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 161.23199462890625, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 161.23199462890625, + 108.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 108.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Applicable to all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 253.60861206054688, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 253.60861206054688, + 135.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 135.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Applicable to fewer than all parties:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.696, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 294.59735107421875, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 294.59735107421875, + 215.362548828125 + ], + [ + 96.696, + 215.362548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.2 INSTRUCTION WHEN FIRST ITEM OF DOCUMENTARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC \nOR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS ADMITTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 527.136962890625, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 527.136962890625, + 121.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 121.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.3 INSTRUCTION WHEN EVIDENCE IS FIRST PUBLISHED TO JURORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 533.1845092773438, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 533.1845092773438, + 122.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 122.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.4 INSTRUCTION REGARDING VISUAL OR DEMONSTRATIVE AIDS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 513.1220703125, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 513.1220703125, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 151.1307830810547, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 151.1307830810547, + 150.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 150.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Specially created visual or demonstrative aids base ted assumptions:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 481.14508056640625, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 481.14508056640625, + 342.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 63.647999999999996, + 342.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "301.5 EVIDENCE ADMITTED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.872, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 420.4440000000001, + 120.69 + ], + [ + 64.872, + 120.69 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.1 INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 209.304, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 119.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 254.0213623046875, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 254.0213623046875, + 122.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 71.60400000000001, + 122.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.484, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 347.616, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 65.484, + 106.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.4 PROBABLE CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 228.5369415283203, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 228.5369415283203, + 122.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.5 LEGAL MALICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 212.86691284179688, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 212.86691284179688, + 121.863037109375 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 121.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.6 INSTITUTING OR CONTINUING A PROCEEDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.708, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 408.81600000000003, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 408.81600000000003, + 105.30000000000001 + ], + [ + 66.708, + 105.30000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.7 LEGAL CAUSE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 107.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 199.6221466064453, + 107.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 199.6221466064453, + 121.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 121.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Legal cause generally:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 134.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 218.03871154785156, + 134.9815673828125 + ], + [ + 218.03871154785156, + 148.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 148.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Concurring cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 197.82183837890625, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 197.82183837890625, + 299.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 299.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Intervening cause:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 196.2704315185547, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 196.2704315185547, + 476.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 476.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.8 ISSUES ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 222.6448516845703, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 222.6448516845703, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.9 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 303.7117004394531, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 303.7117004394531, + 107.60302734375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 107.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "406.12 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 370.32611083984375, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 370.32611083984375, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPENSATORY DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 274.70404052734375, + 324.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 274.70404052734375, + 340.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 340.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 1C\na. Injury to reputation; shame, humiliation, guish, hurt feelings:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 359.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 446.7864685058594, + 359.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 446.7864685058594, + 382.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 382.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b. Loss of Capacity for th ent of Life.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 321.51727294921875, + 468.18 + ], + [ + 321.51727294921875, + 483.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 483.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. en lost fimeshown:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 253.41334533691406, + 542.7 + ], + [ + 253.41334533691406, + 557.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 557.7324981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMOUNT OF LOSS OR HARM IS UNCERTAIN OR DIFFICULT TO \nDETERMINE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.5, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 484.7431335449219, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 484.7431335449219, + 120.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 76.5, + 120.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "503.1 PUNITIVE DAMAGES \u2014 BIFURCATED PROCEDURE 3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 104.49 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 104.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. First stage of bifurcated punitive damages procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 317.01599999999996, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 128.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "b(1). Punitive damages for acts of an individual defendant:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 315.79200000000003, + 289.17 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 289.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c. Second stage of bifurcated punitive damage procedure:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 547.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 322.524, + 547.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 322.524, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 559.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(1). Opening instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 233.784, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 581.5799999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "d. Closing instruction, second stage:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 240.04190063476562, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 240.04190063476562, + 391.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 391.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "c(2). Punitive damages \u2014 determination of amount:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 319.6494140625, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 319.6494140625, + 106.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 106.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.1 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 286.0333251953125, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 286.0333251953125, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 41, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 317.1022033691406, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 317.1022033691406, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION - FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 456.90179443359375, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 456.90179443359375, + 122.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 122.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 415 & FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 90.404", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 43, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 535.83984375, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 535.83984375, + 107.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 107.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.60986328125, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.60986328125, + 120.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 120.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LITIGATION PRIVILEGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.096, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 234.51312255859375, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 234.51312255859375, + 120.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 66.096, + 120.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FAILURE TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.0230712890625, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 355.0230712890625, + 131.974609375 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 131.974609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE SWORD-SHIELD DOCTRINEE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 243.72412109375, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 243.72412109375, + 106.474609375 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 106.474609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FAILURE TO RAISE ADVICE OF COUNSEL AS A DEFENSE'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 486.96502685546875, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 486.96502685546875, + 106.863037109375 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 106.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 49, + "polygon": [ + [ + 59.976, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 475.053955078125, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 475.053955078125, + 120.603515625 + ], + [ + 59.976, + 120.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECTION 700-CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 330.5740661621094, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 330.5740661621094, + 123.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 123.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FOR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 53, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 334.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 334.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.34400000000005, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 544.7863159179688, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 544.7863159179688, + 131.94708251953125 + ], + [ + 313.34400000000005, + 131.94708251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERDICT FOR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.324, + 320.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 320.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 334.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 261.324, + 334.0670471191406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768898" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2baf175ab017ac990987031d68edeceeab45efdc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## THE HONORABLE DONALD HAFELE, PRESIDING + +CASE NO.502009CA040800 XXXXMB + +DEPUTY CLERK: NICOLA RIRD.C. + +COURT DEPUTY: MICHAE NG, D.S. + +COURT REPORTER: NANCY PAULSEN - PALM BEACH REPT'G (941)468-2779 + +COUNTER-PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S) + +J. JACK SCAROLA, ESQ.- SIA BAKER-BARNES, ESQ) DAVID P. VITALE JR. ESQ. BRITTANY MO ESQ. + +VS + +COUNTER-DEFENDANT ATTumfEY(S) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN SCOTT LINK, ESQ. JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. KARA BERARD ROKENBACH, ESQ. + +> JURY TRIAL CLERK NOTES (12/42018) + +## TUESDAY — DECEMBER 4.2018 + +9:28 Court in session FILED 1.4 . 9:29 Bench Conference DEC 0 4 202;q:45ArA. ; Judge announced case for the Record C SHARON 3. 3OO,c 9:30 Appearances for the Record 9:31 Atty Scarola addressed the court obo CPLTF Settlement announced 9:34 Atty Link addressed the court obo CDFT Epstein/apology announced 9:37 Judge addressed the court 9:45 COURT ADJOURNED + +LERK & o;• \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e373d022fa0d20b1ab1be6c59d413c5b84ac9444 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954/EFTA02768954.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768954.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 876, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.09, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "THE HONORABLE DONALD HAFELE, PRESIDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.53, + 70.4012451171875 + ], + [ + 495.2380065917969, + 70.4012451171875 + ], + [ + 495.2380065917969, + 93.07000732421875 + ], + [ + 136.53, + 93.07000732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TUESDAY \u2014 DECEMBER 4.2018", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.34, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 229.31219482421875, + 475.4699999999999 + ], + [ + 229.31219482421875, + 491.03997802734375 + ], + [ + 71.34, + 491.03997802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768954" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..917a86df3932627ffe08a9c1146bb9a5d285332e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO: JEFFREY EPSTEIN 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff. + +## NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIM )VITA PREJUDICE + +?( 7'r J. , by and thro JAC C RO Flo ar No.: 169440 A ey E-Mail: jsxOsearcvlaw.com; and ccann@searcylaw.com Primary E-Mail: \_scarolateam@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Counterclaim + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Nichole J. Segal, Esquire +njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; +kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com +Philip Burlington, Esquire +pmb@flappellatelaw.com;kbt@Flappellatelaw.com +Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. +444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-721-0400 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire +staff.efile@pathtojustice.com +[REDACTED] Pottinger LLC +425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jay Howell, Esquire +jay@jayhowell.com +Jay Howell & Associates P.A. +644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 +Jacksonville, FL 32211 +Phone: (904)-680-1234 +Fax: (904)-680-1238 + +Paul G. Cassell, Esquire +paul.cassell@law.utah.edu +S.J. Quinney College of Law +383 S University Street +Salt Lake City, UT 84112 +Phone: (801)-585-5202 +Fax: (801)-581-6897 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire +kara@linkrocklaw.com +Scott J. Link, Esquire +Scott@linkrocklaw.com; +Troy@linkrocklaw.com; +[REDACTED]; +Link & Rockenbach, P.A. +1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +Suite 930 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-727-3600 +Fax: (561)-727-3601 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2db2dd552f608d639f2820fe337a00143f52938 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955/EFTA02768955.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768955.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2689, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF \nCOUNTERCLAIM )VITA PREJUDICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 426.0400695800781, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 426.0400695800781, + 375.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 375.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 157.95 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768955" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f312e78ac28cfc9a0171192fb73a2640099f1b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, T, IN AND LORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 XXMBAG + +## MOTION TO PROPOUND IN EXCESS OF T \ QUESTS FOR ArSISOWS + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ( - moves this Honorable Court pursuant pro ions of Rule I.340(a), Florid\* les offivil Procedure, to increase the number for Admissions permitted herein so -to aiew for athe filing of admissions in a with those attached, and in support o this motion, Defendant/Counterplainti show: ,a, ..; c, (J. c m y and through his unde thed coNsel, + +- I. Th prem Court has not approved a form of Request for A sions for this type of actio nic::) e elements of the claims asserted and the nature and complexi circumstances giving rise to the claims are not susceptible to being adequately coy twenty-five (25) Request for Admissions limit. +- 3. The elements of defenses asserted or expected to be asserted are no being adequately covered within the twenty-five (25) Request for Admission limit, of the factual red within the susceptible to + +Epstein v. et al. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Propound in Excess of 30 Requests for Admissions + +4. The use of written discovery is the least burdensome, least expensive and most expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant/Counterplaintiff by w ich to obtain necessary information and narrow trial issues. + +5. The Plaintiff/Counterdefendant will not be prejudiced through tzh an g of this ) motion. + +6. The foregoing factors and others to be presented upon hearing of this Motion constitute good cause for increasing the number of Requests for'Ndmissions permit ed herein. + +/ + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct corny of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, 14/ day of October, 010. + +rola Bar No.: 169440 + +cy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (5S-9451 + +Attorney for J. + +Epstein v. et al. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Motion to Propound in Excess o130 Requests for Admissions + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & CO Lehrman, PL Fax: (954) 524-2822 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 'S C) Phone: (954) 524-2820 + +) + +CL( S + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esqui Burnett, P. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach( 33401-6170 Phone: (561) Fax: (561) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3aea8bff77955332161f3cbe7af2126e79e76fe5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957/EFTA02768957.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768957.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2854, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nT, IN AND \nLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 74.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 530.347412109375, + 74.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 530.347412109375, + 116.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 116.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO PROPOUND IN EXCESS OF T \\ QUESTS FOR ArSISOWS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.08, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 531.5947265625, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 531.5947265625, + 363.363037109375 + ], + [ + 73.08, + 363.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.144, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 148.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 254.144, + 148.1080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768957" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c37c896cbaa0e4cc154ffcf7734d08344d6c4042 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.md @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +A + +Cos + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAP ITION DUCES TECUM IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE D CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that ril 25. 2019. at 9:30 a.m. at Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1555 Palm Beach Boule S e 930, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein will take the deposition by oral examination for purposes of C discovery and for use as eviden ause, or both, of + +# EAN-LUC BRUNEL + +The video de si ion will be taken before a court reporter, a Notary Public, or any officer autho to inister oaths by the laws of the state where the deposition is conducted, and a pers neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who i ither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action. The deposition will continue from day to day until complete. + +Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, this puts you on notice that court reporting services will be provided by Palm Beach Reporting Service (1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-471-2995) and the video equipment will be + +operated by Visual Evidence (601 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; 561-655-2855). + +The witness has been directed to bring the documents identified in the Subpoena Duces Tecum attached as Exhibit 1. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attome Service List below on April 4, 2019, through the Court's e-filing portal puns of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). ed on the Fl 'da Rule + +> LINK & ROCKENBA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes oul ard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach Us 401 (561) 847-4408. 55-2891 [faxj + +By: /s/ Sc + +BN 602991) d Rockenbach (FBN 44903) : Scott@linkrocklaw.com : Kara@linkrocklaw.com ndary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Trov@linkrocklaw.com + +Counsellor Plaintiff Jeffiey Epstein + +# SERVICE LIST + +| Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +# **EXHIBIT 1** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: + +TO: Jean-Luc Brunel do Joe Titone 621 S.E. Fifth Street Pompano Beach, FL 33060 + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +Defendant. + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR VIDEk DEPOSITION + +YOU ARE COMMAND B4cc,)a r before a person authorized by law to take depositions on April 25, 201 : 0 a.m. at Link & Rockenbach, PA, 1555 Palm Beach Boulevard, Suite 930, plm Beach, Florida 33401, for the taking of your videotaped deposition in this on. Ikyouu fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +CO SA + +You poenaed to appear by the following attorneys, and unless excused from this Subpo attorneys or the Court, you shall respond to this Subpoena as directed. + +You are further directed to produce to Plaintiff's counsel by April 18. 2019, the documents identified in the attached Exhibit "A." + +Dated: April 4, 2019. + +LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN Primary: Scot linIcrocklaw Primary: Ka Secondary: Tina Secondary: Tro Counsellor Plaint' + +If you are a person with a disability who needs any a this Subpoena, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to t contact Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408, at least s or immediately upon receiving this notification is less than seven days; if you are hearing or soic tion in order to respond to on of certain assistance. Please ulevard, Suite 930, West Palm ayifbefore your scheduled appearance, time before the scheduled appearance mpaired, call 711. + +Copies provided to: + +"stay 7 + +| SERVICE LIST | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

|

Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein

| + +## EXHIBIT A + +### DEFINITIONS + +A. The terms “you” and “your” refer to Jean-Luc Brunel and entities owned or controlled by him, and his agents, representatives, assigns, attorneys or other person or entity acting or purporting to act on his behalf. + +B. An entity is deemed to be owned by you if you directly or indirectly hold 25% or more of the ownership interests, and an entity is deemed to be controlled by you if, through ownership of voting interests, by contract or through other understandings or arrangements, you have the ability to direct in any meaningful respect the manager and affairs of the entity. + +C. Entities owned or controlled by you shall include, without limitation, MC2 Models Management, LLC, MC2 Models Miami, LLC, Scouting International Investment Co., Ltd., Scouting I International Co. and L’éclair au Café Limited Liability Company, and all present or former entities, affiliates, subsidiaries, parents and assigns of each. + +D. The word “communication(s)” shall mean any oral or written statement or exchange of information of any type between two or more persons or entities, including but not limited to documents, facsimiles, e-mails, instant messages, text messages, telephone or face-to-face conversations, meetings or conferences. Communications also includes any enclosures or attachments. + +E. The word “document” shall include all written, printed, typewritten, electronically stored, recorded or graphic matter, photographic matter or sound reproduction, including, without limitation, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, correspondence, reports, tests, analyses, memoranda, contracts, agreements, notes, notebooks, work papers, charts, graphs, projections, financial models, diaries, calendars, appointment books, schedules, travel and expense reports, studies, checks, invoices, statements, receipts, bulletins, computer print-outs, e-mails, social media communication or posts, text and instant messages, interoffice and intraoffice communications, applications, tax records, notations of conversations or meetings, transcripts of any kind (including transcripts of conference calls or television appearances), video and voice recordings and every other data compilation on which or through which information of any type can be obtained, translated if necessary into reasonably usable form, which are in the possession, custody or control of you or your counsel. “Documents” shall include originals, all drafts and copies that differ in any respect from the original, and any material recorded in verbal, graphic, computer, telecommunicative, or magnetic form, or any other form capable of being read, heard or otherwise understood. The word “document” has the broadest meaning possible, including but not limited to all reasonably available electronically stored information. You are requested to produce electronically stored information in the form in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. If a document was attached to an e-mail, produce the accompanying e-mail thread. + +F. “Communications” and “documents” specifically include all electronically stored information (“ESI”) or related data which includes, but is not limited to, electronically stored data on magnetic or optical storage media; documents and emails stored in networked, web, or cloud + +servers (such as Google Mail); network or social media accounts; text or other messages stored on electronic devices, including cellular phones, computers, tablets, etc.; and "active" file(s) (readable by one or more computer applications or forensics software). If relevant metadata such as author and creation data are visible on an ESI document, you are requested to produce the ESI document as a M -stamped text-search PDF; otherwise, you are requested to produce the ESI document in native format. + +G. The phrases "related to" or "concerning" shall mean refer to, contain, allude to, respond to, comment upon, discuss, show, disclose, explain, mention, analyze, constitute, comprise, evidence, set forth, summarize, support, refute or characterize, eithe directly or indirectly, in whole or in part. + +H. All words in the present tense include the past tense and all include the present tense. All words used in singular form include plural in plural form include singular form. e past tense all words used + +I. The words "and" and "or" as used herein shall b either disjunctively or conjunctively as required by the context to bring within the these requests any answer that might be deemed outside its scope by another. + +J. Any reference to any individual Xncludes their partners, members, managers, officers, directors, agents, employees, d t contractors, representatives, assigns, attorneys, affiliates or other persons or entiti urporting to act on their behalf. + +K. The "relevant period" m x ticrt ai anuiNy 1, 2007 to the present unless stated otherwise in a request. + +# TED DOCUMENTS + +- I. All documents relating t corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity in which yo t1 l an interest including, but not limited to: + - a. corporation, Bylaws, Minute Books, Books, Transfer and Annual Reports. financial statements, credit applications, lease applications, loan applications, financial affidavits and financial representations which were prepared for or submitted by you personally or on your behalf or on behalf of any entity directly or indirectly owned by or controlled by you at any time during the relevant period. + - c. All Forms W-2, Forms 1099 and any other documents reflecting any income (including salary, bonuses, profit distributions, and any other fore of income), compensation, remuneration or revenue, including all gross and net revenue received by you directly or indirectly from any entity owned or controlled by you at any time during the relevant period. + +- d. All bank statements, brokerage statements, securities statements, money market account statements, commodities account statements, securities account statements, mutual fund statements, annuities statements, whole life insurance statements, financial account statements, financial institution statements, transaction statements, accounts receivable statements, loan statements, lease statements, credit card statements, revolving credit statements, accounts payable statements which were prepared by or received during the relevant period by you, or on your behalf or by or on behalf of any entity owned or controlled by you at any time during the relevant period. +- e. The most recent bank ledger sheets or other financial account ledger sheets (including, without limitation, brokerage accounts, securities accounts, commodities accounts, margin accounts, money market accounts, mutual fund accounts, annuities accounts, retirement accounts, financial instrument accounts) in your possession, or accessible by you on the internet, with respect to all such accounts in which at any time during the relevant period you had or any entity owned by or controlled by you had a right to withdraw funds. +- f. All records pertaining to the sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition at any time during the relevant period of any money or property interests or financial interests of any type, nature or description, whether for or without consideration, made by you or on your behalf, or by or on behalf of any entity owned or controlled by you at such time. +- g. All records indicating ██████████ all income, compensation, remuneration, revenue, reimbursement, benefits and all other things with a fair market value of \$1,000 or more received from any and all sources at any time during the relevant period in question directly or indirectly by you from any entity owned or controlled by you or for which during such time you served in any representative capacity. +- h. All records indicating any and all income, compensation, remuneration, revenue, reimbursement, benefits and all other things with a fair market value of \$1,000 or more received from any and all sources at any time during the relevant period in question directly or indirectly by any entity owned or controlled by you or for which during such time you served in any representative capacity. +- i. All tax returns, including, without limitation, federal, state, local or foreign tax returns and including, without limitation, all such returns relating to taxes on income, wealth, sales, use, personal, VAT, gifts, withholding, foreign accounts, foreign assets, transfers, stamps, real estate transfers, payments to contractors, trusts, small business corporations, corporations, partnerships, limited liability company, and charitable organizations ("Taxes") filed with any taxing entity during the relevant period by you or on your behalf, or on behalf of any entity owned by you or controlled by you at the time of filing. Include all schedules, worksheets and supporting documents relied upon, used or prepared in connection such returns. + +2. All documents evidencing travel from January 1, 2004, to the present including, but not limited to, passports, itineraries, plane tickets, lodging receipts, transportation receipts, and calendar entries. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73ad4cdc5b52cad211db10e7e794c1d5a73f17c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960/EFTA02768960.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,584 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768960.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 16580, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAP ITION DUCES TECUM \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE D CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EAN-LUC BRUNEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.188, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 365.5330505371094, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 365.5330505371094, + 486.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 486.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 196.863037109375 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 196.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 514.10302734375 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 514.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 300.51 + ], + [ + 465.73199999999997, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.3, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0867919921875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 543.0867919921875, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.3, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR VIDEk\nDEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.744, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 482.2588195800781, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 482.2588195800781, + 320.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 129.744, + 320.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 348.84, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 467.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.116, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 85.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TED DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 387.21630859375, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 387.21630859375, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 224.60399999999998, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 1 + ], + [ + "Span", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768960" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..371bd281393aca0716e85201e71323b78d90d7a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +A + +Goes + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT TAPED DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM IN THE EPSTEIN V. R N SEVERED CLAIM + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that April 25, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. at Link & Rock viS ch " 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930, West Palm Beach, Florida 3340 postponed. n of Jean-Luc Brunel scheduled on + +## CATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoitl document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on Ap 019, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Adminis tion .5 6(b)(I). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com Primary: Kara(glinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com Secondary: Troy@linkrocklaw.com Counsel for PlaintiffJetey Epstein + +## **SERVICE LIST** + +| Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
1075 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 102
Boca Raton, FL 33487
marc@nuriklaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +| Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
smahoney@agwpa.com
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + + NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c17370e80e504803e095959ce72ef40d9e47eaf2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969/EFTA02768969.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768969.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2820, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT TAPED DEPOSITION \nDUCES TECUM IN THE EPSTEIN V. R N SEVERED CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 523.872, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 88.12799999999999, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 388.9223937988281, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 349.452, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768969" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..593c61af555ff1a268166966553a4bb1a774f2b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S NOTICE IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE ILABILITY D CLAIM + +Counsel for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, givgdalj thdf they are unavailable on the following dates: + +> July 1, 2 (pre-paid vacation) + +Accordingly, undersign during this period. request that no proceedings or deadlines be scheduled + +O + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 1, 2019, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(6)(1). + +> LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 1075 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant tpthstein + ++0 + +## SE RICIIgHSSST + +By: /s/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 60299 + +Kara Berard Rockenbac ir903) + +Primary: li om + +Primary: Kara w.com + +Secondary: cklaw.com + +Secondary: inkrocklaw.com + +Coin ntiff Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 iaoldberger(Thagwpa.com smahoney@agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..661f05e15615134adf519dbb9a3cf6f8d2a8e29d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971/EFTA02768971.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768971.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1498, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.76, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S NOTICE \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE \nILABILITY\nD CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.536, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 139.536, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 388.8902587890625, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SE \nRICIIgHSSST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 351.2011413574219, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 351.2011413574219, + 404.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 404.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768971" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aac7b4e73195c7c1cccea63698ad78a2873970ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.md @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +A Cos + +### PLAINTIFF'S RE I UEST FOR PRODUCTI I N TO DE E NT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN IN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE S D CLAIM + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Flo ' dct leV Civil Procedure 1.350, requests that Defendant Scott Rothstein produce the foil d ments within the time permitted under Rule 1.350 or a shorter time as the Court + +### FINITIONS + +I. "Communication "communications" mean any oral, written or electronic utterance, notation o state en of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomsoever made, including, but not limit documents, correspondence, letters, facsimiles, e-mails, text messages, voice re discus= interviews, conferences, meetings, consultations, agreements, and other understandings or exchanges between or among two or more people. 0video recordings, voicemail, instant messages, conversations, dialogues, + +2. "Document' or "documents" mean all paper documents, graphic or auditory records or representations, tangible items, and electronically stored information, and shall have the broadest possible meaning accorded to it consistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 + +(which is incorporated in this definition as if fully set forth), and includes, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the following items which are in your possession, control, knowledge, or are known to you: + +- a. All written, paper or printed material of any kind, including, but not limited to: all transmittal slips, memoranda, notes, schedules, agend , notices, books, brochures, calendars, employment files, announc meeting newsletters, telegrams, summaries, lists, compilations e transmissions, transcripts, diaries, appointment books Ac,ree ts, contracts, reports, studies, checks, check stubs, ,Ci • tei financial statements, bank statements, receipts, commun' c ',Ski i p roffice and intraoffice exchanges, correspondence, and letters, whether in minutes, records of meetings, records of conyc) conversations, inquiri person, by telep , in ting, or by means of any other transmittal devices, an 1 als, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts an all n -identical copies of the foregoing; +- b. Gil c,s qr auditory records or representations of any kind, including, but not imited to: all images, photographs, charts, drawings, sketches, diagrams, maps, schematics, microfiche, microfilm, slides, videotapes, laser discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, UltraViolet discs, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, recordings, sound bites, motion pictures, voice messages, and all originals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafts and all non-identical copies of the foregoing; and + ++0 + +- c. Electronically stored information, electronic, mechanical and electrical records or representations of any kind including, but not limited to: all electronic communications, text messages, e-mails, instant messages, computer logs, network logs, Internet history, document files, spreadsheet files, presentation files, database files, desktop publishing files, urce code files, object code files, executable files, data files, management files, text files, portable document fo files, virtual machine files, XML files, webpa Oi age files, design files, GIS files, system files, compressed i image files, audio files, t"' files, backup files, metadata t ginals, reproductions, copies, changes, amendments, drafisil\*Ii t " (defined herein as "ESI" ividual electronically stored document is defined herein as ' 4.3/ current'). project bulated data n-identical copies of the foregoing + +For purposes of the i , documents may be located, stored or archived in any physical location or on any el nic s rage media, including, without limitation, any computer, server, appliance, cloud- ce, web-based service, database, internal hard drive, external hard drive, solid- dtiv , hard or floppy diskette, compact disc, digital versatile disc, Blue-ray disc, UltraVi , flash memory, flash card, thumb drive, cartridge, magnetic tape, mobile phone,e1 Y vice, or personal digital assistant. Moreover, for purposes of the foregoing, the term "draft" means any earlier, preliminary, preparatory, or tentative version of all or part of a document, whether or not such draft was superseded by a later draft and whether or not the draft's terms are the same as or different from the final document's terms. Please note that "Document" and "Documents" as defined herein specifically include "Communication" and "Communications" as defined above. + +3. "Native Format' means the file format of ESI in the application in which such ESI was originally created. + +4. "Person" as used herein means any natural person or any entity, including, without limitation, any individual, public company, private company, firm, corporation company, joint venture, trust, proprietorship, tenancy, association, partn &CI liability ess, agency, department, governmental body, bureau, board, commission, or any o er public or private entity. With respect to an entity, Person shall include all subsidi :15' ) iliates of the entity, as well as the present and former directors, officers, employ ,c , e? ys, agents and anyone acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the contro i its, thse ity or its subsidiaries or affiliates. + +tein and his representatives, attorneys, accountants, agents and any other perso der his control or on his behalf. + +6. "Relates to" or " l to" mean authorizing, concerning, constituting, comprising, containing, cons , connected with, describing, disclosing, discussing, evidencing, explaining, ing, pertaining to, proposing, reflecting, regarding, referring to, directly or indi settin forth, showing, or summarizing. + +suit means the litigation styled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Case No. 5020 003OOOCMBAG, pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +8. "Other Lawsuits" means all lawsuits filed by Jane Doe, L.M., E.W. or any other clients represented by the Rothstein Adler law firm against Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2008 to the present. + +9. "Tagged Image File Format' or "TIFF' refer to the CCITT Group IV graphic file format for storing bit-mapped images. + +10. Where appropriate: + +- a. use of the singular includes the plural, and vice versa; +- b. the past tense includes the present tense; +- c. the words "and" and "or" are both conjunctive and disjunctive; +- d. the words "all" and "any" mean "any and all"; +- e. the word "including" means "including without limitation"; +- f. use of the masculine includes the feminine, and vice vers + +# INSTRUCTIONS + +# General Instructions + +CO + +1. In response to this Request for Productio ou are required to furnish all information and documents which are, or have been, i o o ession, custody, or control, or in your possession, custody, or control. + +2. Unless otherwise specifically 4i each Request, the relevant time period shall be the period from January I, 2008 to + +3. ESI Production LESI shall be produced electronically, either in (1) Native Format, or (2) as s' le-p e, uniquely and sequentially numbered Group IV TIFF image files. For each E at t, all metadata must remain intact and all parent/child document relationsh be maintained. All ESI shall be collected using methods that prevent the spoliation data. + +4. Production Media The production of ESI as described herein shall be made on an external hard drive, flash drive, CD or DVD ("Production Media"). The Production Media shall include a unique identifying label specifying: (a) your identity; (b) the date of the production of ESI; and (c) the Lawsuit name and number. + +# Instructions + +5. ESI of Limited Accessibility. If you contend that any ESI document responsive to this Request for Production is not reasonably accessible: (1) timely identify such ESI document with reasonable particularity; and (2) provide the basis for declining to produce the ESI document, including, for example, any limitations on access, the likely costs that might be incurred in accessing and producing the ESI document, the method used for storage of the ESI document and all locations in which the ESI document is kept. + +6. TIFF Production.ESI produced as HIT image files shall bcaA) ge d as follows: (1) each production of 77FF image files shall be accompanied by a co spo load file ("Image Load File"); (2) each TIFF image file must contain the sa representation as the Native Format file from which thei t) 77FF image file must not be less than 300 dpi 'Sric" • 4) each TIFF image file shall be accompanied by an extracted text file containi ( c eacted text of the Native Format file from which the TIFF image file was created• il►Attie eac xtracted text file shall be named to match the **of each corresponding** TIFF image file; (6) the by a Control List File ("LW"); (7) each production of panied by an image cross-reference load file, such as Opticon the beginning and ending endorsed number of each 77FF image file ion and same physical ge file was created; (3) each endorsed number assigned to th extracted text files shall be a TIFF image files shall b ("OPT"), which provi and the nu r pages it includes; and (8) each production of 771.7; image files must be accom a data load file C'Data Load File" or "DAT') that contains both the hash value and all available metadata of the Native Format files from which the TIFF image files were created. Further, the following instructions apply to the production of TIFF image files: + +- a. Processing Specifications. For each Native Format file that is converted to TIFF format: (1) all tracked changes shall be maintained so that all changes + +are visible; (2) OLE Embedded files shall not be extracted as separate documents; (3) author comments shall remain or be made visible; (4) hidden columns, cells, rows, worksheets and other hidden data shall remain or be made visible; (5) presenter notes shall remain or be made visible; and (6) to the extent EN in a foreign language is produced, processing of such ESI shall be unicode-compliant. + +- b. Document Unitization. If a Native Format file tha -rted to TIFF format is more than one page, the unitization of a t c any attachments or affixed notes must be maintained c • ) ex when collected. If unitization cannot be maintain cC, ee ginal unitization must be documented in the Data Lo 1%, erwise electronically tracked. +- c. Color. If a Native For t f it is converted to TIFF format contains color, the TIFF i e fi eed not be produced in color. However, we reserve the e a request for a file to be produced in color. Where 'age File Format is Impracticable. In the event that w produy 5.kr ' of a Native Format file as a TIFF image would be impracticable, you all produce such file in Native Format with all metadata intact. You shall provide a single page TIFF image placeholder referencing the title of the Native Format file not being produced as a TIFF image. Spreadsheets. All Microsoft Excel files, similar non-Microsoft spreadsheet files, and graphical compilations of spreadsheet data, shall be produced in Native Format with all cells, columns, rows and worksheets and other information unhidden and expanded. + +f. Right to Request Native Format files. We reserve the right to demand production in Native Format of any file produced by you as a TIFF image file. + +## REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION + +- 1. All communications and documents presented to actual or potential invest is or their representatives and other third parties in connection with the Ponzi scheme f which you were convicted. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to die (41atto ) eys listed on the Service List below on July 5, 2019, through the Court's e-filing portalet ant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). + +O(s Marc + +Law Offibys of Marc S. Nurik 1075 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 102 + +Boca Raton, FL 33487 + +marcanuriklaw.com + +Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +LINK & RO 1555 Pal West P (561 H, PA es Boulevard, Suite 930 Florida 33401 ; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +# SERVICE LIST + +. Link + +tt J. Link (FBN 602991) + +Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) + +Primary: Scott@linkrocklaw.com + +Primary: Kara@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Tina@linkrocklaw.com + +Secondary: Troy®linkrocklaw.com + +Counsel for Plaint¶Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack A. Goldberger + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +iizoldberger(anwpa.com + +smahoney®,agwpa.com + +Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d960eff4b2dfcd28cd9abb163830a22c546f78b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973/EFTA02768973.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,513 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768973.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 12687, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S RE I UEST FOR PRODUCTI I N TO DE E NT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN \nIN THE EPSTEIN V. ROTHSTE S D CLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 542.232, + 348.363037109375 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 348.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FINITIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 349.45367431640625, + 444.69000000000005 + ], + [ + 349.45367431640625, + 458.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 458.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 265.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 265.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "General Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 355.57199999999995, + 293.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 253.36799999999997, + 293.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Instructions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 348.24188232421875, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 348.24188232421875, + 459.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 263.15999999999997, + 459.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 394.0575256347656, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 394.0575256347656, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 234.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 234.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 388.4980773925781, + 250.10302734375 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 250.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 553.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 553.4830169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 130 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768973" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba9983a63e6a3c31110889ec39592dd88918f9ce --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION: AG CASE NO.: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB + +JEFFREY Ele, Plaintiff/Petitioner + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN + +LM, Defendant/Respondents. + +## NOTICE OF LACK OF PROSECUTION. COURT'S 5, MOTION TO DISMISS. AND ORDER SETTING ILEA RI + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that it appears on the face of thc'raird that no activity by filing of pleadings, orders or court, or otherwise, has occ or mom immediately preceding service of this Notice, by the Court. Therefore, any interested person, whether Court, may serve notice to all parties that no such given. a period of ten (10) months been issued or approved action or not, including the occurred. Such Notice is hereby + +Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Proc within sixty (60) days following the servic during such sixty (60) day period, this a or on the motion of any interested pe notice to the parties unless a party hearing on the =don why the a 0(e), if no such record activity occurs lice, and if no stay is issued or approved be dismissed by the Court on its own motion Cher a party to the action or not, after reasonable od cause in writing at least five (5) days before the remain pending. Such Notice is herein provided. + +It is ORDERED as follows: + +- 1. If there Is a thin iu this case within sixty (60) days immediately following service of this Notice, counsel and Ilpro se parties shall appear before the Court for a Mandatory Status eierce/Scheduling Conference on August 25, 2020 at 08:45 am, in Co OD, at the Pahn Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, We each, FL 33401. A courtesy copy of any filing made after the date of this prior to the above hearing shall be furnished to this Court. Failure to appear at the hearing may result in the imposition of sanctions including dismissal of the action. +- 2. If there are no filings within sixty (60) days of this order but Plaintiff files a Showing of Good Cause after the expiration of the sixty (60) day period, counsel and all pro se parties MUST appear before the Court on August 25, 2020 at 08:45 am, in Courtroom 10D, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, for a hearing on the Coutt's Determination of Good Cause. The Showing of Good Cause shall be filed with the Clerk and Comptroller's Office na less than five (51days prior to the hearing and a courtesy copy shall be furnished to this + +JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES POTTINGER LEY ESQ staftefile@pathtojustice.com LLC 425 N. ANDREWS AVENUE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL SUITE 2 33301 ATTERBU ERG & JACK GOLDBERGER ESQ. Jgoldberger®agwpa.com WEISS P 250 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE smahoney®agwpa.com SOUTH, STE 1400 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 JAY HOWELL ESQ jay@jayhowell.com 644 CESERY BOULEVARD, SUITE 250 JACKSONVIII F, FL 32211 LINK & ROCKENBACH PA KARA BERARD karinglinlaecIdaw.com ROCKENBACH ESQ troy®IinIcrocIdaw.com 1555 PALM BEACH LAKES kbrockigflacivillaw.com BLVD., SUITE 930 + +Court. Plaintiff is directed to bring a copy of the Showing of Good Cause and a proposed order (with stamped envelopes) to the hearing. Failure to appear at the hearing may result in this matter being dismissed. + +- 3. If no sta as been issued or approved by this Court, no filings made within the sixty + - (60) day period, and no showing of good cause filed at least five (5) days prior to the hearing in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 2 above, THIS ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED UPON FURTHER ORDER OF COURT. +- 4. If all claims in this case have been settled. dismissal papers mist be filed as t all claims, including counterclaims, cross claims and third party claims, as well all parties, including all co-defendants. A Mediator's Report does not dismiss t n. To be excused from the hearing at the date and time specified in paragraph iabo ve, ou must file with the Clerk of Court the appropriate dismissal papers and file Final Disposition Sheet (Form 1998) as required by Florida Rule of Civil Proced 00(y)(3). + +DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Florida, this 22nd day of May, 2020. + +![](_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg) + +## COPIES TO: + +l'AT.ttioacurr onald tvr arror• Or TM/ Colts? + +50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB 0522/2020 Donald Makin Judge + +| | WEST PALM BEACH, FL
33401 | | +|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| LAW OFFICES OF MARC
NURIK ESQ | MARC S. NURIK ESQ
1 E. BROWARD
BOULEVARD, SUITE 700
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
33301 | marc@nuriklaw.com | +| BURLINGTON &
ROCHENBACH PA | NICHOLE J. SEGAL ESQ
444 WEST RAILROAD
AVENUE
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
33401 | njs@flappellatelaw.com
kbt@flappellatelaw.com | +| PAUL G. CASSELL ESQ | S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF
LAW
383 S. UNIVERSITY STREET
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112 | cassellp@law.utah.edu | + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tammy Anton, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notifica n if the time before the schedu led appearance is less than 7 days; ou are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvålida esita algån acomodamiento para poder participar en este proc imt o, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le prov a c er ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Ta y nton, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 3340 o número (561) 355- 4380, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita-41 ara su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente desp s arecibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia k a programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación oíåo o dc la voz, llame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon Id bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, e san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou j en k éd. Tanpri kontakte Tammy Anton, kbbdonaté pwogram Lw u ameriken kl Enfim yo nan Tribinal Konte Palm Beach la Id n North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telefön se 1) 355-4380 nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret ibinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokas on lé ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jon; si ou gen = pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62e482c6b9a00f1fe9a7ed60c3c261c657e89c6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/EFTA02768981.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6879, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.32, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 485.4981994628906, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 485.4981994628906, + 82.863037109375 + ], + [ + 126.68399999999998, + 82.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF LACK OF PROSECUTION. COURT'S 5, \nMOTION TO DISMISS. AND ORDER SETTING ILEA RI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 469.404, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 469.404, + 267.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 267.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COPIES TO:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 147.19790649414062, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 147.19790649414062, + 462.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 462.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768981" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5ecd1231e0e1fa0855578ee3ffc2610d0f5a0ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768981/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2370d6379701f725dcff9c299fbe9c9fe96bfc10900e5848a3477b80b4531896 +size 3011 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec4454ada78c0b6541a8a868fcd7db5553d978f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE IP bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case No 50-2009CA040800XXIOCMBAG (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., + +Defendants. + +6 S1A + +## PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WIC & PREJUDICE + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through Darren Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, p 1.420(a)(1)(A), hereby voluntarily dismiss PI without prejudice. This dismissal resolv d Richard D. Kahn, as Coorida Rule of Civil Procedure against Defendant, Scott Rothstein, fining claims in this case. + +## C OF SERVIC + +I certify that the foreg Service List below on June 23, of Judicial Administrati 2.51 ent has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule 1). + ++6s + +LINK & ROCICENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 847-4408; (561) 855-2891 [fax] + +By: Is/ Scott J. Link + +Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Rockenbach Link (FBN 44903) Primary: Scott®IinIcrocklaw.com Primary: ICara@linIcrocklaw.com Secondary: TinaAlinIcrocklaw.com Secondary: Trow2IUinkrocklaw.com Counsellor Plaintiff + +## SERVICE LIST + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 4800 N. Federal Highway, Suite 205B Boca Raton, FL 33431 marc@nuriklaw.com Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 jeoldbergereagsvpa.com smahoney@agwpa.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff + +Cos \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc700f29e11241585c6b41c09759eb3c3c5a8fba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985/EFTA02768985.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768985.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1572, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WIC & PREJUDICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 520.1378784179688, + 286.74 + ], + [ + 520.1378784179688, + 302.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 302.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C \nOF SERVIC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 422.82 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 437.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 437.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.712, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0862731933594, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 351.0862731933594, + 72.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 260.712, + 72.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768985" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93924d4bf6cd5fb78bac41bd0ca2c94bc3b7b3bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRC , IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, i LORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +## RE-NOTICE OF HEAACA) + +(Cancels hearing for 10/27/10) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIEDradersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +O N -10 GC y? Cn + +DATE: November 4, 2010 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +C + +JUDGE: Honorable ' F. + +PLACE: 20 ,4Sixi . D ighway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +i Motion to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for ISamages + +## SPEC t TIERS TO BE HEARD: + +, + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel an attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Re-Notice of Hearing + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of 010. hed by + +> JAC Flo da sar Dip.. .9440 Der eyicarola Barnhart & Shipley alm Beach Lakes Boulevard aim Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 686-6300 ax. (5S-9451 ~Etomey for J. + +Mt adv. Epstein Case No • 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Rc-Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +11.1=, Eq. , Jaffe, Weissing,=I, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Esq. ME Burnett, P.A. 777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of M One E Broward Fort Laude Phone: (95 49 Fax: (954 6 N Suite 700 01 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a2d1d135e665b87939f7c7fecabebe2bd353153e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987/EFTA02768987.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768987.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2123, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRC , IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, i LORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.9083862304688, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.9083862304688, + 115.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 115.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF HEAACA)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.112, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 380.625, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 380.625, + 349.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 224.112, + 349.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC t TIERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 279.1109313964844, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 279.1109313964844, + 582.3580169677734 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 582.3580169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.562, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.8482971191406, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 351.8482971191406, + 146.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 254.562, + 146.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768987" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3b387c1a91f92c229974f688d2bdc5cd897ac0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +## GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +A"ft, ta; iv c:, e c) cox ....." I . r" z n (4 vc rn tll ti -.17'Pc3 r- + +ORDER ON STATCAN ttiNa c' HELD OCTOBER 15, 2010 ---igo, uti + +-0 In + +THIS MATTER came before lpn a Status Conference set by the Court. This Court having reviewed the Joint t e having heard the argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the p mi is hereby + +ORDERED AND T JUDGED or as follows: + +- 1. The ies s all schedule Defendant, Scott Rothstein's Motion to Vacate Default within thirty rom the date of this Order; case will remain on its presently scheduled eight week jury trial docket beginning arch 7, 2011 through April 29, 2011; +- 3. The parties shall take Scott Rothstein's deposition within thirty (30) days, if possible. + +[End of Order Done & Ordered on Next Page] + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order on Status Conference 10-15-2010 + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this + +of 0 , 2010. + +Copies Provided to: See Service List + +Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 .44r + +David F. Circuit Judge + +CO 'S + +## SERVICE LIST c + +IS\* Esch enney, Scarola, Barnhart & ley, P.A. 9 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lill A. Esq. Burnett , P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08f4fae842656d544157b18048de68b67ebe7e84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990/EFTA02768990.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768990.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1760, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.552, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 526.05419921875, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 526.05419921875, + 140.79998779296875 + ], + [ + 321.552, + 140.79998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 369.864990234375, + 302.94 + ], + [ + 369.864990234375, + 317.36749267578125 + ], + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 317.36749267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768990" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0f7eb67c77d6abecc3047e31a173bc2a9853fcc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +2010 NOV -4 PM 12:07 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +SHARON R. BOCK COUNTY +PATH BEACH CIVIL S. LT + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL OR +ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL OR ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S +CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the +premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: + +The Motion to Compel is granted. All requested documents +shall be produced within fifteen (15) days of this Order. +To the extent that documents are not produced or specific +redacted entries in documents are not produced a contemporaneous +privilege bag shall be served and filed. It is the online + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4th +day of Nov, 2010. + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +of this Order that any redacted entries not produced +shall be accompanied by a privilege bag with the +specific basis for each redaction. In all other +respects the Motion is denied. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion to Compel or Alternatively Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Damages + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +"Inn Burnett, P.A. Esquire 777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Suit Offices of Marc . N One E Broward B Suit 00 Fort Lauderdal 01 Phone: (954 Fax: (954 Attom ton Rothstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9f90be31dc7325e293c5c16d46430e5a7244f6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992/EFTA02768992.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768992.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2456, + "elapsed_seconds": 44.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL OR ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.362, + 300.24 + ], + [ + 518.736, + 300.24 + ], + [ + 518.736, + 327.762 + ], + [ + 103.362, + 327.762 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.64, + 167.4 + ], + [ + 364.2082824707031, + 167.4 + ], + [ + 364.2082824707031, + 183.363037109375 + ], + [ + 269.64, + 183.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768992" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9be73d1e8381eebb867215b94d7db70a3993c347 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +2010 MOV -4 PM 12:07 +MARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL +COMPLETE RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLETE RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE (dated March 18, 2010), and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED. All requested documents shall be produced within 20 days of June 29, 2010, except to the extent that specific documents or redacted entries in documents are subject to claims of privilege properly documented in a contemporaneously filed Privilege Log meeting all applicable requirements of Florida law. *Any redacted entries shall identify the basis of the redaction* + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 44 day of Nov, 2010. + +*[Handwritten signature]* +DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ef970062acff3ac1dcd40241bd4ba40f7381a1d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994/EFTA02768994.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768994.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1398, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLETE RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.78200000000001, + 300.483 + ], + [ + 468.018, + 300.483 + ], + [ + 468.018, + 328.941 + ], + [ + 109.78200000000001, + 328.941 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768994" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33cd988b73382e5dc3250eb30aa3fe7b6e76efe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING FIRST SET +OF EXPERT WITNESS INTERROGATORIS AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT +REPORTS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, +and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Notice of Propounding First +Set of Expert Witness Interrogatories and Request to Produce Expert Reports directed to +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] numbered 1 through 13 and Request to +Produce Expert Reports numbered 14-16 to respond to within the time prescribed by the +Fla.R.Civ.Pro. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly +furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this +4th day of November, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +SEE FOR RECORD IN THE +FLORIDA ROCK CIRCUIT +DEFENDANT FIRST SET + +**Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG** +**Epstein's NOS of Expert Int to [REDACTED] and RTP Experts Reports** + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 +FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-defendant + +NOTA CERTIFICATE OF COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c054846677faf3479474702956beb5227a45050f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995/EFTA02768995.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768995.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2119, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.39, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.63, + 106.29899999999999 + ], + [ + 547.626, + 106.29899999999999 + ], + [ + 547.626, + 148.149 + ], + [ + 330.63, + 148.149 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING FIRST SET OF EXPERT WITNESS INTERROGATORIS AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.176, + 354.051 + ], + [ + 551.478, + 354.051 + ], + [ + 551.478, + 395.901 + ], + [ + 82.176, + 395.901 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.04600000000002, + 575.0190000000001 + ], + [ + 396.114, + 575.0190000000001 + ], + [ + 396.114, + 589.2479999999999 + ], + [ + 233.04600000000002, + 589.2479999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's NOS of Expert Int to [REDACTED] and RTP Experts Reports", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.66199999999998, + 56.079 + ], + [ + 553.404, + 56.079 + ], + [ + 553.404, + 85.374 + ], + [ + 199.66199999999998, + 85.374 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768995" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a19319cfe4b0249d29fd8db077572f54f0a8b87 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +2010 NOV 10 PM 3:36 + +FILED + +**ORDER SETTING HEARING** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on **Defendant** [REDACTED] **Motion for Final Summary Judgment** and his request for 40 minutes for hearing, and upon review of the matter, it is + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a hearing on the above **Motion** is scheduled in the above-entitled matter for **Wednesday, January 5, 2011 at 4:00 p.m.** before the undersigned, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, **Courtroom 9C**, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. (40 mins. reserved) + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, within a reasonable time prior to any proceeding, contact the Administrative Office of the Court, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 5.25, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, telephone (561) 355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD), or 1-800-955-8770 (V), via Florida Relay Service. + +**Please Note:** + +1. 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +2. 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +3. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double spaced pages and must reference the hearing date. +4. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +5. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed order with copies and envelopes for all counsel/parties. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Florida this 10th day of November, 2010. + +DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6a14dfb3708859bc6d1f6770ff94776f831ed15 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997/EFTA02768997.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768997.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2290, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SETTING HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 375.753, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 375.753, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 273.78000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Please Note:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.71000000000001, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 182.091, + 428.49 + ], + [ + 182.091, + 439.02 + ], + [ + 115.71000000000001, + 439.02 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 162 + ], + [ + "Line", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768997" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e8bcdfbe7953ec10a26e81add9a4226334b4819 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE\_- Fl TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU T, IN AND • FUR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLOVIDA + +C • SE NO.: 502009CA040800 5.6CMB/AG % ' + +## NOTICE OF H ARIN + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that following: dAigned has called up for hearing the + +DATE: Tuesday, November l4,.-2010 - + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable David (Palm Be h County Courthouse) + +PLACE: 205 Ij DixiY, Highway, West Palm ach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPECIFI RS TO BE HEARD: + +Ed Motion to Propound In Excess .f Thirty Requests for Admissions + +AA, + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she c tacted opposing counsel anb attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +adv. Epstein, et al Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disa accommodation to participate in this proceeding not later than seven (7) days prior to the procee 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florid ilities Act, persons in need of a special contact the Court Administrator's office ings. If hearing impaired, c i ntact (TDD) Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has \*shed by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached lis this II day of 2010. + +9• •0 carola Barnhart h Lakes Boulev Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 686-6300 (5S-9451 mey for J. Shipley NM adv. Epstein, et al Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## C rt NSEL T + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +En, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., esquire Burnett, P. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler West Palm B L 3401-6170 Phone: (56 ) 23 Fax: (561 6 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f7b0b8db0595590fa861051bb1c91115478f3d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998/EFTA02768998.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02768998.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2112, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF H ARIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.51000000000002, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 367.836, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 367.836, + 348.6085510253906 + ], + [ + 237.51000000000002, + 348.6085510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFI RS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.381, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 280.1633605957031, + 554.04 + ], + [ + 280.1633605957031, + 568.3485412597656 + ], + [ + 66.381, + 568.3485412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C rt NSEL T", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.8300476074219, + 130.091552734375 + ], + [ + 349.566, + 130.091552734375 + ], + [ + 349.566, + 145.093017578125 + ], + [ + 256.8300476074219, + 145.093017578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02768998" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..443d7d1ec8efa71ff70ef2da8c29a7562048b777 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +2010 NOV 16 PM 12:30 +SMARON R. BUCK, CLERK +SMARON BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON [REDACTED] MOTION TO PROPOUND IN +EXCESS OF THIRTY REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon Defendant/Counterplaintiff, +[REDACTED] MOTION TO PROPOUND IN EXCESS OF THIRTY REQUESTS FOR +ADMISSIONS, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it +is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: granted 10 days to + +report, except to be interviewed while is + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 16th +day of NOV., 2010. + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +*denied without progress* + +ads'. Epstein, et al. Case No.:11.040800XXXXMBAG Order on Motion to Propound in Excess of 30 RFA + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6 Phone: (561)-727-2423 Fax: (561)-802-997 Attorneys for Jef4 Epste + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc One E Broward Blvd Fort Lauderdale Phone: (954)-74 Fax: (954)- -3 Attome ott Rothstein + +Scarola, Esq. y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Phone: 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for J. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c2e00ad6489080ec3dd6a3f2b0547007ed8b51a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001/EFTA02769001.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769001.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1982, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON [REDACTED] MOTION TO PROPOUND IN EXCESS OF THIRTY REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.056, + 341.106 + ], + [ + 468.65999999999997, + 341.106 + ], + [ + 468.65999999999997, + 368.62800000000004 + ], + [ + 172.056, + 368.62800000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.776, + 166.8 + ], + [ + 368.765380859375, + 166.8 + ], + [ + 368.765380859375, + 182.60302734375 + ], + [ + 274.776, + 182.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769001" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0247298c4d88448f635816654affecddac296a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XX3CXMB AG + +O J , + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DE SITION + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Plainti follows: elled the below deposition as + +NAME DATE AND T + +Scott Rothstein Friday, November 19 10:00 a.m. + +## ATE OF ERVI E + +LACE + +Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center 7000 N.W. 41 Street Miami, FL 33166 + +It i/ I HEREBY CER that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this i day of November, 0 to : + +Jack Scarola, Searcy D .la Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Pp1j c Lakes Blvd. West Pal each, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +![](_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURN 901 Point West 777 South Flagler D West Palm Beach Telephone: (561 Facsimile: (561) + +Attorn Ac i ey Epstein, Plaintiff + +(561) 835-0220 Cc: U.S. Legal Support + +IS' \ W:180743tnotice of canccllalion of Cep° of Rothstein II-1940.J A \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ec1e39ba91841577bc66780fc8814b73fc52caf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/EFTA02769003.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1354, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.06, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.802, + 78.396 + ], + [ + 556.614, + 78.396 + ], + [ + 556.614, + 121.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 308.802, + 121.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DE SITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.896, + 300.24 + ], + [ + 455.6444091796875, + 300.24 + ], + [ + 455.6444091796875, + 315.1125183105469 + ], + [ + 184.896, + 315.1125183105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ATE OF \nERVI E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.54000000000002, + 466.7749938964844 + ], + [ + 401.6380310058594, + 466.7749938964844 + ], + [ + 401.6380310058594, + 481.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 237.54000000000002, + 481.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769003" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b83b64fa5438d5b56a793d7ab0a3983bf216be28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769003/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:60edf768c2d6427b6a5f029ae52d48ef27fcea84656a7fe52488f2d3eed9a61a +size 2193 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5bae124911e5ec8d4e7d7753150660f278284150 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +HARRIS & COUNT CLERK +CIRCUIT COUNTY, FL +10 NOV 22 PM 3:27 +FILED + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING EXPERT INTERROGATORIES +TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], hereby gives notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through 16 have been directed to Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, this 22nd day of November, 2010. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 22nd day of November, 2010. + +*Jack Scarola* + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Expert Interrogatories To Jeffrey Epstein + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 e t s Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +St En Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL °N 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 AS C) + +E. Knight, Esq. L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of M . Nu One E Brow. ite 700 Fort Lauderd e, 3 301 Phone: (9 Fax: (9 -3556 Attorneys Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a47600cd2d7133f5e3afcbac1176d99eda13090c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005/EFTA02769005.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769005.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1994, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 322.926, + 80.99499999999999 + ], + [ + 548.2679999999999, + 80.99499999999999 + ], + [ + 548.2679999999999, + 121.90999999999998 + ], + [ + 322.926, + 121.90999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING EXPERT INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.586, + 341.515 + ], + [ + 490.488, + 341.515 + ], + [ + 490.488, + 369.07 + ], + [ + 149.586, + 369.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.20799999999997, + 137.775 + ], + [ + 366.4582824707031, + 137.775 + ], + [ + 366.4582824707031, + 153.60302734375 + ], + [ + 272.20799999999997, + 153.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769005" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..656e4aae1ddb2d7b81b254e5353f5b335cb7c490 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +10 NOV 23 PM 3:22 +SHARON E. BACK, CLERK, +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT COURT, FL +7 + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +**DATE:** Wednesday, January 5, 2011 + +**TIME:** 4:00 p.m. + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse +205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +██████████ Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +Epstein v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of November, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Scarey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +Epstein v. [REDACTED] et al +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e096b7371fed693d47e939a5ddd009d903f7f5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007/EFTA02769007.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769007.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2452, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.54, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.292, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 367.227, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 367.227, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 236.292, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 579.96 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 579.96 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 592.92 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 592.92 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.17099999999996, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 348.34799999999996, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 348.34799999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 255.17099999999996, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769007" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..248c0d079ac3d16ee7142a3255680635f8b6aa66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +2010 NOV 23 PM 2:12 +PLAINTIFF'S COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +**PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED PRIVILEGE LOG** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through undersigned counsel and hereby files his Amended + +Privilege Log in the above-styled case. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 19th +day of November, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By: r L. Ackerman, Jr. + +2Inati W \8074ANOF Amended Pnvilcgc Log I I -194010(1M S ame 5:1 II + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +901 PointWest + +BURNE11 46 . + +777 South Flagler Drive a + +West Palm Beach, Fl... mu% 401 + +Telephone: (561) 8 Pl 4 + +Facsimile: (561 " + +Attorneys for J yftpstein, Plaintiff + +EPSTEIN v. ROTHSTEIN, ET AL. + +## AMENDED PRIVILEGE LOG + +| Date | Title Document | No. | Recipient | Author/Sender | Subject | Privilege | +|-----------|--------------------------------------------|---------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2008-2009 | Invoices/Billing Statements | None | Client | Burman, Critton, Luttier & Colement, LLP | Attorney bills with redacted info unrelated to Jane Doe's case. Info redacted relates to other cases and/or claims made against client unrelated to Jane Doe's claims. | Atty-Client
Work-Product | +| 2009-2010 | Bank Statements of Burman, Critton, et al. | 000001-000090 | Burman, Critton, et al. | Wachovia | Wire transfer payments into the account of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLC with info redacted that is unrelated to the Jeffrey Epstein case and relates to other clients or personal business of Burman, Critton, et al. | Atty-Client
Work-product
business
trade
secrets | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7c84fc9d53389653acfbd987803b04934bf1866 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010/EFTA02769010.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769010.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3207, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.79, + 79.135 + ], + [ + 569.454, + 79.135 + ], + [ + 569.454, + 121.618 + ], + [ + 317.79, + 121.618 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.94400000000002, + 290.717 + ], + [ + 509.748, + 290.717 + ], + [ + 509.748, + 304.878 + ], + [ + 148.94400000000002, + 304.878 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.17000000000002, + 375.683 + ], + [ + 409.596, + 375.683 + ], + [ + 409.596, + 389.011 + ], + [ + 247.17000000000002, + 389.011 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.04200000000003, + 115.49999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.69677734375, + 115.49999999999999 + ], + [ + 498.69677734375, + 131.070556640625 + ], + [ + 330.04200000000003, + 131.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769010" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cf5f009ba41c6a94c4211bc21925a3dd7515ecb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIvIBAG + +### NOTICE OF TAKING DEPO + +Duces Tecum + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List S , + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the u attorneys will take deposition of: + +NAME AND ADDRESS + +Robert D. Critton + +\ZIP' upon oral examin &s t before Signature Court Reporting, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the p ose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +TIME + +Janu 10, 2011 • a.m. + +Cos + +r. a C. Ca) r— + +LOCATION + +Searcy Denney, et al Annex Bldg., Suite 100 2139 Palm Beach Lakes BI. West Palm Beach, FL + +# DUCES TECUM: + +Any and all documents\* constituting, reflecting, and/or relating to evidence of damages claimed to have been sustained by Jeffrey Epstein as a consequence of any improper act or omission on the part of + +Epstein v. et al Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Deposition DT: Robert D. Critton Page 2 + +\*The term "documents" includes but is not limited to all non-identical copies of letters, notes, memoranda, e-mails, faxes, records, transcripts, and entries, regardless of whether they were made manually, mechanically, electronically, magnetically, digitally, or by any other means, and regardless of whether they are on papers, tape, film, electronic device electronic media, as well as application metadata and system metadata, or any other media o g. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoin finished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this r, 2010. + +> Jack Sc Flori •.: 169440 ey Scarola Barnhart & Shipley m Beach Lakes Boulevard alm Beach, Florida 33409 ne: (561) 686-6300 ax: (51,9451 Attorney for J. + +Cis) cc: Signature Court R rting + +## MICRO eo AND SUMMATION BRIEFCASE FILE (SBF) DISC REOleD AMICUS IF SBF NOT AVAILABLE + +#### AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +Epstein v. et al Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Deposition DT: Robert D. Critton Page 3 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6 Phone: (561)-727-2423 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Es Law Offices of One E Browa Fort Laude Phone: Fax: (9 ICZ 4V Nurik mite 700 33301 849 556 + +Co s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c133adfa3e5d49507c877e1238b49244e9e28a49 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013/EFTA02769013.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769013.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3151, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 74.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 531.3588256835938, + 74.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 531.3588256835938, + 115.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 115.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 400.72200000000004, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 400.72200000000004, + 324.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 324.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.78700000000003, + 628.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 367.75799560546875, + 628.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 367.75799560546875, + 643.9335174560547 + ], + [ + 269.78700000000003, + 643.9335174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MICRO eo AND SUMMATION BRIEFCASE FILE (SBF) DISC \nREOleD AMICUS IF SBF NOT AVAILABLE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.712, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 462.5762939453125, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 462.5762939453125, + 550.6074981689453 + ], + [ + 99.712, + 550.6074981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.28800000000004, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 396.6059265136719, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 396.6059265136719, + 589.2090759277344 + ], + [ + 204.28800000000004, + 589.2090759277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.953, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 348.86181640625, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 348.86181640625, + 157.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 253.953, + 157.93353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769013" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8beb216668623a7c1a7236f223df323d595f870 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +2010 DEC - 1 PM 4:20 +J. ARICKER, BOCK. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +FILED + +ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S +OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS +AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Request for Admissions and Interrogatory +dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully +advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant's Objections are sustained as to Requests No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15 +and 29. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objections to Requests 22, 25 and 28 are +overruled. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010 at West Palm Beach, +Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm +Beach, FL 33401 +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b447b1df57abc6730485ee752ae5bd39b3a10331 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016/EFTA02769016.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769016.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1603, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.53, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 103.53, + 312.65999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769016" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3a48b251a86203dd39221e250ab5e9345f12eb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +FILED +2010 DEC - 1 PM 4:20 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S +OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE +DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Request to Produce dated September 16, +2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the +premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant's Objection to Requests No. 1 and 4 are overruled. In all other respects the +Objections are sustained at present. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010 at West Palm Beach, +Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm +Beach, FL 33401 +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..467027f9ae4d33b8acab795c365ad352a6d05fba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017/EFTA02769017.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769017.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1484, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] REQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.71000000000001, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 479.2830000000001, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 479.2830000000001, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 115.71000000000001, + 311.04 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769017" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..383423ff3f716373d85ae290a341e3be8468e7b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S +OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] INTERROGATORIES +DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +2010 DEC - 1 PM 4:20 +STATION R BOCK. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +FILED + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Defendant, [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS' Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objections are sustained as to Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9. As to question no. 7, the objection is sustained on the attorney/client privilege. The Court defers in regard to Interrogatory No. 8 pending the filing of an Amended Complaint by the Plaintiff. The Objections are overruled as to questions No. 10, 11 and 16. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ba35383ec3659d92255fd3ff81d8816a72b4270 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018/EFTA02769018.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769018.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1720, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.509, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 490.85400000000004, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 61.509, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] INTERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.40899999999999, + 247.86 + ], + [ + 470.757, + 247.86 + ], + [ + 470.757, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 122.40899999999999, + 285.92999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769018" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4d7a41ed562ba53bcb100a77ce963caaec938d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.md @@ -0,0 +1,668 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v S. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, + +Defendants, + +### MOTION FOR A STAY OF SUBPOENA PENDI MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FO SCHEDULING ORDER ON C G ON PREVIOUSLY-FILED CTIVE ORDER, AND FOR N A PRIVILEGE LOG + +Defendant, J. urs to Rule 1.280(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for protec an abusive subpoena issued by plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein through this Court and im and on bankruptcy trustee Herb Stettin. + +Epstein has served a s ena on and Stettin that will require to review more than ,000 a es of materials to identify responsive documents and to assert appropriate p Moreover, Epstein has contrived to have issues regarding this Court's subpoena in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida through the happensta that possession of the documents (records of a law firm) rests in the hands of Stettin. Epstein apparently contemplates that the bankruptcy court will make rulings on privilege issues that properly should be made by this Court. + +Epstein's maneuvers threaten to burden both this Court and the bankruptcy court with making duplicative, potentially conflicting, and likely unnecessary rulings. Accordingly, + +asks this Court to stay enforcement of its subpoenas for a brief period of time to permit this Court to first rule on the pending motion for summary judgment on all of Epstein's claims that have been filed by . If any of Epstein's claims somehow survive the pending summary judgment motion, then this Court could rule on the proper scope of the subpoena and any privilege or other issues which remain to be litigated. proposes a schedule to rapidly bring these issues to resolution and urges the Court to adopt it. a requests a protective order, narrowing the scope of the production requests made by and requiring billionaire Epstein to pay all reasonable costs associated with r to his discovery requests. + +As this court is well aware from a summary, Jeffrey Epstein (a convicted sex offender) ha conduct that occurred in the course of • .kg%n 'Y/ motion • filed by counsel Plaintiff J. Esq., for presentation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. Edwar f nd pursued civil lawsuits against Epstein to recover .7"a'' damages for Epstein's extensive ittern of molestations. In retaliation and to try and intimidate and his young cl, tts, Epstein brought this lawsuit in this court alleging that had somehow fated and/or exaggerated the claims. has now filed a comprehensive e motion for s rg, judgment against Epstein, detailing how he is entitled to judgment on each and evtrl of Epstein's frivolous claims. + +### BACKGROUND FACT + +Epstein has yet to file any response to comprehensive summary judgment motion. Nonetheless, he continues to harass through discovery requests connected with this case. In particular, on April 12, 2010, Epstein propounded an extremely broad Request for + +Production (RFP) to See Exhibit "A." Containing some 27 different requested items, the RFP seeks all sons of electronically stored information, including a raft of internal emails between and other attorneys, paralegals, expert witnesses, investigators, and others who worked on the civil lawsuits against Epstein. On May 11, 2010, duly responded to the request for production. Through his legal counsel, noted that many of the requests sought attorney-client or work-product privileged information and others were overly broad and unduly burdensome. See Exhibit "13." + +While was raising his objections to the subpoena lodged agiiinst him, Epstein duplicated his requests by serving a separate subpoena for the\_same information. On April 16, 2010, four days after making the requests to ojvaiting for his responses to the requests, much less a court ruling on objections Epstein served a subpoena duces tecum for documents on bankruptcy court-appoitifed t stee, Herb Stettin. + +A bit of background may be helpful here. Mr. Stettin never represented any of the underage females who had been sao ially abused by Epstein. Instead, Mr. Stettin has possession of certain records related to th and many more entirely unrelated to this case — because he was court-appointed nkruptcy trustee for the now-defunct law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler during his tation of his young clients, was employed by RRA. It was then reveal e law firm president, Scott Rothstein, had been running a criminal Ponzi scheme out of the law firm. Shortly after learning of the fraud, left RRA. Later, RRA declared bankruptcy and the bankruptcy court appointed Herb Stettin trustee of the estate of RRA, charging him with handling financial claims regarding the assets of the firm. RRA's electronic had a brief connection to RRA. For a short period of time + +database, including all electronically stored files and emails, were left in the possession of Stettin. Because Stettin was not involved in the sexual abuse litigation against Epstein, he does not have detailed knowledge of the persons or subjects discussed in the various e-mails and other records. + +On June 28, 2010, a hearing was set before this court on Epstein's Motion to Compel the Trustee to produce the documents responsive to Epstein's subpoena. On tha counsel, counsel, and counsel for Epstein all met in the hallwayc5 and worked out an agreed resolution to the dispute. All counsel a over to Stettin's the courtroom tettin would turn counsel all documents responsive to the subp> na that counsel would then prepare a privilege log and produce all docu re not subject to objection or privilege. At that point, Epstein could pursue any h vcr ments that he wanted in this Court regarding materials not produced. As a resul eement, the Court never held the hearing on the Motion to Compel. Epstein's co n d to draft a proposed consent order for all the parties. + +order. Instead, Epstein Despite the agreement between'the parties, Epstein's counsel never prepared that agreed ed to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Cou the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel being by the bankruptcy court (Judge Raymond Ray). See Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol Established by DE #672, In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR (DE 807) (attached as Exhibit "C"). In his motion, Epstein recounted that he had served a subpoena of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in the bankruptcy proceeding on the trustee. See id. at 2. Epstein did not inform the bankruptcy court, however, that he was seeking the same information from and that had raised claims of privilege. Nor did Epstein mention that he had previously filed a motion to compel before this Court. Instead, Epstein claimed to the bankruptcy court that "[p]roduction of these documents from the Trustee is critical to issues in the state court lawsuit. Without access to the emails in question, Movant will suffer unfair prejudice and will be unable to obtain informatio 'cal to his lawsuit." Id. at 3. Epstein also stated that he was "willing to reimb Estate for its reasonable expenses incurred in reviewing the documents for privile Privilege Log." Id. at 4. ers and preparing a + +In response, on July 19, 2010, filed a Protective Order (DE 818) (Exhibit "D") and an amended Motion for Protect' e DE 819) (Exhibit "E.") to restrict S l c this production so that privileged or other siic' c erable material was not produced. A hearing was held on that Motion and on ust , 2010, the bankruptcy court entered an Order that appointed as Special former B and County Circuit Judge Robert Carney to take all N'N/1 materials responsive to the siftre a `from Stettin and to prepare a privilege log (DE 888) (Exhibit "F"). + +Special r Cat ey did take possession of the materials; however, after reviewing the materials he iately realized that there were obvious problems if he (the Special =) preps ilege log. Specifically, lacking familiarity with the sexual abuse litigation, the Special had no way to determine which materials were relevant and of those relevant materials, which were privileged. Moreover, the privileges were not the Special to assert or waive. Rather, the attorney-client privilege and other privileges were held by clients of + +and himself. As a result of these problems, on September 20, 2010, Special Carney filed a Motion to Clarify Order Appointing Special (DE 1013). (Exhibit "G." + +On September 27, 2010, then filed another Motion for Protective Order (DE 1022) (attached as Exhibit "H"). In that motion, explained that "Epstein asks this [Bankruptcy] Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the Circui over a subpoena duces tecum issued by the state court in connection with an act ing before the state court." Id. at I. further noted that he had previously this information being turned over in state court and that this was Epstein's " ackdoor his way into obtaining information to which he is not entitled." Id. at + +On October 10, 2010, the bankruptcy coy production procedures and the role of the Sp xe •(DE 1068) (attached as Exhibit "1"). In this Amended Order Respecting Pro ',3"N, Documents Regarding Jeffrey Epstein, the bankruptcy court directed the Tru uce all of the materials in question to law firm — =, Jaffe, Weissing , Fistos & Lehrman. =, Jaffe was then directed to produce a privilege log )Ignaterials. The privilege log was to be provided to the Special The Sp will have t pity to provide written submissions respecting the privilege log and to make argum issues relevant to the applicability of privilege as to the documents listed on the 'S )an amended order modifying the was, in turn, to "schedule a hearing . . . where all parties in interest Jaffe privilege log. That hearing shall be transcribed by a court reporter." Id. at 3. Then, "[fJollowing completion of the aforementioned hearing, the Special shall prepare a report making all appropriate findings and recommendations to the Court, which shall be served on all + +parties in interest and filed with the Court, along with the transcript of the Special hearing. . . If an objection to the report is filed by any party in interest, then this Court shall schedule and hold a hearing to resolve with finality the issues of privilege as consistent with the appropriate law and procedures set forth herein." Id. + +Following the entry of this order, Trustee's counsel delivered several disks containing more than 70,000 pages of materials to Jaffe. Some of these materials attirlth day of November, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 727-2423 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +The Honorable Herbert M. Stettin, Trustee +One Biscayne Tower +Suite 3700 +Two South Biscayne Boulevard +Miami, Florida 33131 + +Robert Carney, Special [REDACTED] +2281 Saratoga Lane +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. liriWally, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +# EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE PIMTO + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, requests that Defendant, J. EDWARDS r produce or make available for inspection documents responsive to the requests below within thirty (30) days from the date of service: + +### DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, including, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples + +etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, Atatrr!, video tape, recordings, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or e recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, recordings), and including the file and file cover. discs and + +The term "Document' also means any and aliCcoijuter records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of ind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardless of whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. + +B. "Communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, colloquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. + +C. "Plaintiff" means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marraa), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +- D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. +- E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. +- F. "Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, investigative bills, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + - G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +# REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION.' + +- 1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whethr existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited to: Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; + - c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against + +1 Due to the potential vo documents involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special and/or an in camera inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage the production of documents. + +Jeffrey Epstein; + +- f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +- a. Any Plaintiff and has been associated; +- b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. +- J. or any entity with which he + +3. A I ails, data, correspondence, memos, or si cuments between J. , Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffre hich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +4. A J. regarding Jeffre Kenneth Jenne, ails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between , Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA hich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the follotg: + +- a. Scott W. Ro +- b. +- c. RRA +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein + +W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor to any aspect of any 6. All fee sharing agreements between J. RRA, or Scott Plaintiffs case. + +cuments made available to any investor or potential investor by , RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or entities who invested or purported to invest in any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing the Costs and payment of any bill or Costs in each Plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents received by you or your current firm wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are saved or stored in any media (audio tapes, CDs. DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to or from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. All intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. All documents supporting the contention that a sexual assault took place on an airplane purportedly owned by Jeffrey Epstein or a Jeffrey Epstein entity at any time between 1998 and 2005. + +18. All documents related to the amount of all Costs that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. + +19. All documents setting forth to the amount of Costs were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. during the time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). + +20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: + +"What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as our investigation resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. + +We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children, and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls." + +(A) Provide all documents to support this assertion including any documents which are the source of the informatiorL, + +21. All documents related to or mentioning pgten I deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +22. All documents that support your claiflyofmages in your counterclaim in this case. + +23. The written fee agreemerAth he Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you in this case. + +24. All emails exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or a similar reference was mentioned: y + +- a. +- b. +- i. +- j. +- k. Christina Kitterman. Scott RdThsfein Adler Wi lia Berger Michael Fisten enneth Jenne David B Deborah Andrew Barnett Richard (Rick) Fandrey + +25. A copy of your RRA business card. + +26. Any employment agreements, letter agreements or memos given to you by RRA or a representative or agent of RRA describing your compensation and benefits at RRA. + +27. All documents and communications from Herbert Stettin, as bankruptcy Trustee for RRA, asserting liens against recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of April, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq., +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** + +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 232-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L. ., individually, IVI + +Defendant. + +/ + +...&\*\ + +### DEFENDANT J. EDWARDS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION DATED APRIL 12, 2010 + +Defendant, J. hereby files his. Response to Request for + +Production propounded by Plaintiff on April 12, 2010 as follows: + +- 1. None. 4 L 0 bjection as to communications to or from investigators as that is protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. + - 2. a.` Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. None. + - 4. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. + - 5. None. + - 6. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any investor. + +- 7. None. +- 8. None. +- 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to ,' Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege. +- 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege. +- 22. Not yet determined. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +23. Objection. + +24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege. + +25. None in Defendant's possession. + +26. None. + +27. None in Defendant's possession. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 4 rki IP - furnished via U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on , 2010. + +> Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola • , P.A. Attorneys for Defendant, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bou evar West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-630 Fax: (561 + +By: Jack la C-LX Flo ar No.: /6 frrO + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 +Attorneys for L.M. + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +Debtor. + +Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Chapter 11 + +### JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM TRUSTEE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT PRODUCTION P' OTOCOL ESTABLISHED BY DE #672 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Honorable Court pursuant to the provisio R.Civ.37(a) (which is incorporated into bankruptcy practice by Fed.R.Bankr.P. 70 r an Order compelling HERBERT STETTIN ("STETTIN"), the Chapter 11 Trust Etprate of ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A. ("RRA"), (a) to comply with ? nt Production Protocol established by this Court at his request; (b) to produce documen1pursuant to a Subpoena served upon him in a state court matter on April 17, 2010; and (`'c ) where appropriate to furnish a Privilege Log. In support thereof, EPSTEIN would respectfully submit the following: + +This Court, by virtue of the Order which established the Document Production Protocol'(DE 4672) has taken jurisdiction over all discovery sought of the Trustee. This Court generally has jurisdiction over such matters by virtue of 28 U.S.C.§§ 152 and 1334. + +2. On May 6, 2010, STETTIN moved for expedited relief seeking a Protective Order with respect to discovery which had been served upon him by one group of creditors, and in doing + +Case No. 09-34791 -BKC-RBR + +so requested approval of a proposed Document Production Protocol to be used across the board with respect to future document requests that he anticipated receiving from third parties, both within and outside this bankruptcy case (DE #617). + +3. On May 18, 2010, this Court entered an "Order Granting Trustee's Motiori Seeking a Protective Order and Approving Proposed Document Production Protocol" (DE #672). This Order established the process for anyone wishing discovery from the Trustee. Its operation is not limited to discovery in the bankruptcy case. Moreover, that Order at paragraph 7, retained jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation or interpretation of said Order; i.e., all discovery sought from the Trustee, without any limitation on the forum. + +4. EPSTEIN is currently a party Plaintiff to a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG. The action is entitled Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff vs. Scott Rothstein, individually, J.M, individually, and L.M., individually. + +5. On or about April 17, 2010, counsel for EPSTEIN in the state court had served a Subpoena Duces 7 m for Deposition - Documents Only, on STETTIN in his capacity as Trustee, in an attempt-toibt documents relevant to issues in the state court case. A paralegal from BERGE ERMAN P.A., counsel for the Trustee, wrote to one of the counsel involved in the state cou \*ndicating that the Trustee had retrieved approximately six-thousand (6,000) cmails that might be responsive to the Subpoena described above. The paralegal, one LUIS + +Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +C "), indicated that he anticipated finalizing review of the emails for attorney/client privilege information by May 28, 2010, and intended to produce the documents along with the Privilege Log by May 31, 2010 (Exhibit "A" attached - letter). He verbally indicated that he had further responsive documents other than emails. + +- 6. it did not happen. +- 7. In the meantime, on May 6, 2010, the Trustee had filed his Motion in this Court seeking to establish the Document Production Protocol and this Court entered its Order (DE #672 supra). +- 8. On the strength of the "Document Production Protocol" Trustee's counsel now demanded that Movant enter into a Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order and a Protective Order - the forms established by the Order setting the Document Production Protocol. Movant's counsel forwarded to TORRES, the paralegal, and CHARLES LICHTMAN, ESQ., the executed Joint Ex Pane Motion and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order. Counsel for the Trustee did not file them, nor have they ever produced the required information (notwithstanding that had written that the materials would be ready before the end of May 2010). + +9. Production of these documents from the Trustee is critical to issues in the state court lawsuit. Without access to the emails in question, Movant will suffer unfair prejudice and will be unable to obtain information critical to his lawsuit. To date, the Trustee apparently claims privilege over all of these documents, but no Privilege Log has ever been provided. In addition, there is the potential that the "crime-fraud exemption" to the attorney/client privilege would ultimately apply rendering any claimed privilege, even one that is improperly claimed, to be moot. + +Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +- 10. Movant is willing to reimburse the Estate for its reasonable expenses incurred in reviewing the documents for privileged matters and preparing a Privilege Log. +- 11. Counsel for Movant certifies that we have communicated with Trustee and his counsel in an effort to resolve this issue prior to filing this Motion. + +WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully prays that this Court (a) enter th stipulated Protective Order so that Movant will be in compliance with the Document- n Protocol; and (b) order the Trustee to comply with the Subpoena originally served on April 17, 2010 - almost three (3) months ago. + +Respe + +G. Neiwirth Fla. Bar No. 152175 + +BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3302 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Case No. 09-34791-SRC-RBA + +### CERTIFICATE OFIERVICR + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 14, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some . i other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to 0 it\*ectronically Notices of Electronic Filing. + +Ronaa Nei + +Ronald G. Nei s • ) ti + +![](_page_31_Picture_149.jpeg) + +**BERGER SINGERMAN** +attorneys at law + +Boca Raton Fort Lauderdale Miami Tallahassee + +GIVING BACK. MOVING FORWARD + +Luis [REDACTED] +(954) 712-5127 +Ltornes@bergersingerman.com + +May 21, 2010 + +VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +David A. Yarema, Esq. +BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN +515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Re: Subpoena Directed to Herbert Stettin in the case styled L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, +Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD + +Dear Mr. Critton and Mr. Yarema: + +Pursuant to the subpoena directed to Herbert Stettin ("Trustee") dated April 16, 2010 ("Subpoena") and the various communications we have had regarding the search parameters to be utilized in order to comply with the Subpoena, please be advised that the Trustee has retrieved approximately 6000 e-mails that might be responsive to the Subpoena. We want to make clear that the Trustee does not have the capability to run electronic searches over all of RRA's documents. Therefore, the 6000 e-mails which have been identified are from Scott Rothstein's and [REDACTED] Edward's e-mail accounts. We anticipate finalizing the review of e-mails for attorney-client privilege information by Friday, May 28, 2010, and we intend to produce responsive documents, along with a privilege log, by Monday, May 31, 2010. + +Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 954.712.5127. + +Sincerely, + +BERGER SINGERMAN + +![]()Luis [REDACTED] +Litigation Paralegal + +ANDREW HONKUS + +cc: James C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq. + +![](_page_31_Picture_167.jpeg) + +### SERVICE LIST + +Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. Berger Singerman P.A. 350 East las Olas Blvd., # 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (Via CM/ECF and email) + +Marianella Morales, Esq. Avenida Francisco de Miranda Torre Provincial "A", Piso 8 Caracas, Venezuela (Via CM/ECF) + +John H. Genovese, Esq. Bank of America Tower at International Place 100 S.E. 2e0 Street, II 4400 Miami, FL 33131 (Via CM/ECF) + +Office of the U.S. Trustee 51 S.W. First Avenue, # 1204 Miami, FL 33130 (Via CM/ECF) + +Tew Esq. Tew , LLP Four Scasons Tower, 15 FL 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 (Via CM/ECF) + +Conrad & Scherer, LLP 633 South Federal Highway Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (Via C + +Michael D. Socse, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, 1 E Broward Blvd., #1010 C Ft. Lauderdale, F1. 301 (Via CM/ECF) + +William..14im, Jr. Moskowitz lidandelIA Salim 800 Cotpotate Ds:, 4 510 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33334 (Via CM/ECF) + +\ \_ Special Asiistant U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9 Stop 8000 51 S.W. I° Avenue, N 1114 Miami, FL 33130 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Kendall Coffey, Esq. Office in the Grove - Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133 (Via CM/ECF) + +The Honorable Herbert Stettin One Biscayne Tower, # 3700 Two South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 (ViCail and email) + +John G. Bianco, Esq. Tripp Scott 110 S.E. Sixth S 15 Ft. Lauderdale (Via CM/ECF) + +Alison W Assist\ AtionleY 9914.E. Street, r FL Miami, FL 3132 (Via CM/ECF) + +'4Stlifrey S. Sonn, Esq. Sonn & Ercz, PLC toward Financial Center 500 E. Broward Blvd., ti 1600 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 (Via CM/ECF) + +Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting U.S. Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 333132 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations POB 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail + +Daniel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, inc. 14051 N.W. 14 Street Sunrise, FL 33323 (Via U.S. Mail) USI + +Attn: Anthony Gruppo 200 West Cypress Creek Road, tl 500 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Anthonv.qmonolalusi.biz (Via email) + +United Healthcare Department CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Special Assistant U.S. Attorney IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Island Road, # 340 Plantation, FL 33324-3906 (Via U.S. Mail) + +County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street, N 210 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Miami-Dade County Tax Collector 140 W. Flagler Street, l4°' Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402.3715 (Via Jrlai + +Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Avenue, N 370 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 (via- .S. Mail) + +Mark S. Haltzntan, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone,LLC 3600 Horizon Blvd., # 200 Trevose, PA 19053 rnhalumanfralanutumbenstone.com (Via email and U.S. Mail) + +John Scuola, Esq. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6661 meotesearchlaw.com (Via email and U.S. Mail) The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the U.S. 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530.0001 (Via U.S. Mail) + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., # 700 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 marcanuriklaw.com ,—(Via email) + +Bast Almon LLP SunTrust International Center One S.E. Third Avenue, N 1440 Miami, FL 33131 (Via CM/ECF) + +MI F. hicGirm, Esq. Barletti4ackst Feinberg, P.C. 158 tde>r`at Stieet.9s FL Boston, MA 02110 (Via CM/ECF) + +Darol H.M. Cart, Esq 99 Nesbit Street Punta Gorda, FL 33950 (Via CM/ECF) + +Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 bee(jblankrome.com (Via email) + +Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 S. Dixie Highway, N 121 Boca Raton, FL 33432 (Via CM/ECF) + +Robert C. Buschel, Esq. 100 S.E. Third Avenue, # 1300 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 buschel(iiibalaw.oa.com (Via email and U.S. Mail) + +### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER I I + +Debtor. + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +### MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE PRODUCTION FROM TRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Movant, L.M., moves this Court pursuant to 1 I U dc y I05(a), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 7026 (which expressly into or s c.R.Civ. P. 26(c)), and L.R. 7026-I to request that the Court enter a protective %ttsp ding the Trustee's production of any documents to Jeffrey Epstein because d documents are subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege and/or attomey uct, and in support thereof, states as follows: + +### I. Introduction + +- I. Jeffrey Epstein, throu h his counsel, seeks to pull the wool over the eyes of this honorable Court. Epst et' iiiir asks this Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the Circuit Court ovc subp a duces return issued by the state court in connection with an action pending befofefite st e court. +- 2. M a , L.M., respectfully requests that this honorable Court enter a protective order, consisten with the document production methodology already ordered by the Court [D.E. 672), deny Epstein's motion to compel, and prevent the Trustee's production to Epstein of any documents or ESI sought through his state court subpoena since such production consists entirely of documents and ESI which are subject to proper claims of attorney-client communications + +privilege and/or attorney work product. + +### II. Background + +3. Movant, L.M. is a party plaintiff in a civil lawsuit' against party defendant Jeffrey Epstein in which she alleges that Epstein sexually exploited, abused, and/or assaulted her when she was a minors. The parties recently reached a confidential settlement of this law t on the eve of trial. + +4. Movant's counsel, Brad was employed by RRA. Duri t e Attorney securely and confidentially maintained hard-copies of materials and maintained substantial parts of client case files and investigat es in the Qtask application and other software systems maintained by RRA.2 + +5. This Court has entered other Orders in thi as the privileges of RRA's former clients. See Order Granting Motion for er, D.E. 672. + +6. Epstein filed a lawsuit against Sc . stein, L.M.'s counsel Brad and L.M. individually.3 Epstein has so to ve up his meritless claims against Attorney and L.M., in part, by nvokip is Fifth Amendment privilege in deposition in this case seventy-seven times.4 + +7. On Date, ounsel had a subpoena duces tecum issued from the Circuit Court in + +&#x27; L.M. v. E. #08-CA-28051, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Brad is plaintiff's counsel in this lawsuit. Epstein was also a party defe ns of other civil lawsuits prosecuted by other woman who allege that Epstein sexual exp oiled, abused, and/or assaulted them when they were minors. + +&#x27;See Motion for Protective Order to Exclude Production of Privileged Documents and Testimony from Qtask, Inc. [D.E. 355].

3Epstein v. Rothstein, et al., Case #09-CA-040800-MBAG, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida.

&#x27; Dep. Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein v. Rothstein, et al., March 17, 2010, p. 6 —128.

Epstein v. Rothstein. et at seeking production from Trustee Herbert Stettin of Attorney case files and investigative files which relate to L.M. and his other legitimate clients who possessed bona fide claims or potential claims against Epstein.

  • 8. On Date, L.M., through counsel, filed objections to the subpoena in the Circuit Court.
  • 9. Likewise, L.M. filed a motion for protective order in the Circuit Court where ail subject subpoena had been issued.
  • 10. In addition, the Trustee filed a motion for protective order in the Cir
  • 11. Thereafter, the Circuit Court entered an agreed order on the a mots. s for protective order protecting privileged and work product materials from pre n to Epstein.
  • 12. Now, Epstein has come to the Bankruptcy Court Ours the discovery of privileged and attorney work product materials which the Ci eftu would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel, DE 807.

Ill. Memorandum of Law

A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court

Despite Epstein's state on to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 confer jurisdiction on this hono ourt to adjudicate a discovery matter arising purely under state law claims file i tate court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to perform around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matte g before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the honorable Circuit Court has already ruled on a motion for protective order on the subject state court issued subpoena duces tecum. Accordingly, for reasons of comity, this honorable Court should deny Epstein's motion to compel.

B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorney Work Product and Beyond the Permissible Scope of Discovery

Privileges are invoked by the client who possesses the privilege or by the attorney on behalf of the client.

i. Scope of Permissible Discovery

Rule 26(b) excludes privileged matters from the scope of permissible discovery Epstein seeks the production of documents from clients' privileged case files and inye\*gati files. 2 These documents are beyond the scope of discovery permitted by Rule 26(b ✓

ii. Protective Orders

Rule 26(c) states that a court may protect a party or persptPlWgjn whom discovery is sought, based on "good cause shown:"

A party or any person from whom disco Ac ni s ght may move for a protective order in the court where the ac 'o pending — or as an alternative on matters relating to a deposition, 'et, t c for the district where the deposition will be taken. The moti us include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferrdwr atlbmpted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve h&diitpute without court action. The court may, for good cause, issue an o er o protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, yndue burden or expense, including one or more of the following:

  • (A) forbi
  • (B) speci djtvery; escribing a discovery method other than the one selected by the y eking discovery; forbidding inquiry into certain matters, or limiting the scope of sclosure or discovery to certain matters;
  • (E) designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted; the disclosure or discovery; erms, including time and place, for the disclosure or
  • (F) requiring that a deposition be sealed and opened only on court order;
  • (G) requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way; and

(H) requiring that the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information in sealed envelopes, to be opened as the court directs.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)

Epstein seeks the production from the Trustee of privileged, confidential, and attorney work product materials from the case files and investigative files of L.M. and other clients who 4, possess claims against Epstein. The requested documents, relating to the bona ses of clients are not relevant or calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid dri~fn the instant bankruptcy action or any adversary proceeding presently before thi erefore, the requested documents are beyond the scope of permissible discovery. requested materials are not discoverable under the Florida Rules of Civil P e Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Bankruptcy Rules of Civil Procedure cu\ n possibly applicable system of rules. Moreover, the document production method not intended to be a conduit of privilege w product of RBA's former clients to the clients' litigation adversaries. Epste < n :lunsel distorts and misrepresents the purpose of the \ . document production method° egy vrguing that it was created to facilitate such improper e tablished by order of this Court was discovery.

Epstein's counsel 4ilther attempts to skirt the issue of privilege by failing to meaningfully identify the nat i1 /r the requested materials, other than describing "emails" and documents "other t . The materials requested by Epstein, essentially case files, client files, and invest ry rles are patently and obviously privileged. Epstein's counsel offers no argument, cognizable under any set of possibly applicable rules, to demonstrate entitlement to these privileged and work product materials.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, Epstein is not permitted to obtain production of

documents and ESI from the Trustee which comprise the privileged, confidential, or attorney work product portions of case files or investigative files, and Movant requests that the Court deny Epstein's motion to compel, grant the foregoing motion for protective order, and enter a protective order excluding the production of any documents or ESI by the Trustee which relate to any cases or matter of L.M. or other clients and granting any other relief the Coup deems appropriate to protect the clients of Jaffe Weissing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(D), M 4Stounsel has contacted Epstein's counsel in a good faith attempt to resolve the matt r without a hearing and I further certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing w examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the t email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the atta Actre'd cieSs N,1 'fie list this I9th day of July, 2010. ed on electronically to the /ECF subscribers, and by

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am ad \ MSSbni , Bar of the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florida and in pliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in ul 090-1(A).

JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS & LEIIRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)524-2820 Telephone (954)524-2822 Facsimile

By: /s/Seth Lehrman

Seth Lehrman FLBN 132896 seth@tpathtojustice.com

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Marianella Morales, Esquire (VIA EMAIL)
Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors
Avenida Francisco de Miranda
Torre Provincial "A"
Piso 8
Caracas, Venezuela

John H. Genovese, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
Robert F. Elgidely, Esq.
Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA
Bank Of America Tower at International
Place
100 S.E. 2nd Street
Suite 4400
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 349-2300
Fax (305) 349-2310

Kendall Coffey, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Coffey Burlington,
Office in the Grove
Penthouse
2699 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com

Hon. Herbert M. Stettin (VIA EMAIL)
One Biscayne Tower
Suite 3700
Two South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131

John G. Bianco, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
John M. Mulli, Esquire
Tripp Scott
110 Southeast Sixth Street
Fifteenth Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301
jgb@trippscott.com

Alison W. Lehr (VIA EMAIL)
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street
7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 961-9176
Fax: (305) 536-7599
Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov

Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
srosenfeldt@rra-law.com

Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Sonn & Erez, PLC
Bro [REDACTED] Financial Center
500 E. Broward Boulevard
Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
Phone: (954) 763-4700
Fax (954) 763-1866
jsonn@sonnerez.com

Office of the US Trustee (VIA CM/ECF)
51 Southwest First Avenue
Suite 1204
Miami, Florida 33130

[REDACTED] Tew, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
[REDACTED] Maynard Gollin, Esq.
Tew-[REDACTED], LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131-3407
tt@tewlaw.com
lmg@tewlaw.com

Conrad & Scherer, LLP (VIA EMAIL) 633 South Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel: 954-462-5500 bs®conradscherer.com JSilver®conradscherer.com

Michael D. Seese, Esq. (VIA EMAIL) Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP I E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: 954.4677900 Fax: 954.4671024 mseese®hinshawlaw.com

Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail)

Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 Tel.: (954) 423-7300 Fax.: (305) 982-5406 (Via U.S. Mall)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW 1st Avenue, til I I Miami, Fl 33130 Fax: (305) 530 (Via U.S.

Grant J. q. (VIA EMAIL) Rots nfeldt Adler, P.A. 401 East s Olas Blvd Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 gsmith®rra-law.com

United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Island Rd., Ste 340 Plantation, FL 33324-3906 (Via U.S. Mail)

The Honorable Eric H. Ho Attorney General of th 950 Pennsylvania Washington, DC (Via U.S. Mail) Room 4400

Honorab Actin 99 3132 Mail) H. Sloman, mey

niel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, Inc 14051 NW 14th Street Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mail)

William Salim, Jr. (VIA CM/ECF) Moskowitz Mandell & Salim 800 Corporate Dr Ste 510 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334 wsalim®mmsslaw.com Tel: 954.491-2000 Fax: 954.4912051

USI (VIA EMAIL) Ann: Anthony Gruppo 200 West Cypress Creek Road Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Tel: 954-607-4000 Anthonv.nruppoOusi.biz

Marc Nurik, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
401 East Las Olas Blvd
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
mnurik@rra-law.com

BAST AMRON LLP (VIA CM/ECF)
SunTrust International Center
One Southeast Third Avenue
Suite 1440
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 379-7904
Facsimile: (305) 379-7905
bamron@bastamron.com
jbast@bastamron.com

Mark Bloom, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1221 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
T 305.579.0500
F 305.579.0717
bloomm@gtlaw.com

Robert D. Critton, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
rcrit@bclclaw.com

Roth & Scholl (VIA EMAIL)
Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq.
Attorneys For Creditor Blue
Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P.
866 South Dixie Highway
Coral Gables, FL 33146
Telephone: (305) 662-4141
jeff@rothandscholl.com

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP (VIA EMAIL)
1401 East Broward Blvd
Suite 300

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: (954) 462-1431
Fax: (954) 763-2692
mfbooth@rmzlaw.com

Arthur C. Neiwirth, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1400
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: (954) 523-7008
Fax: (954) 523-7009
aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com

The Florida Bar (VIA EMAIL)
Adria E. Quintela, Esq.
Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq.
Lake Shore Plaza II
1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130
Sunrise, FL 33323
aquintel@flabar.org
apascal@flabar.org

Micheal w. Moskowitz, Esq. (VIA E-MAIL)
800 Corporate Drive, Suite 500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33234
mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com

Francis L. Carter, Esq. (VIA E-MAIL)
Katz Barron Squitero Faust
2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33133
Tel: 305-856-2444
Fax: 305-285-9227
flc@katzbarron.com

██████████ S. Shraiberg, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
2385 NW Executive Drive
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Tel: 561-443-0800
Fax: 561-998-0047
bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com

Henry S. Wulf, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
CARLTON [REDACTED], P.A.
525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone: (561) 659-7070
Facsimile: (561) 659-7368
E-Mail: hwulf@carltonfields.com

EMESS Capital, LLC (VIA EMAIL)
c/o Bruce A. Katzen, Esq.
201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 379-9000
Facsimile: (305) 379-3428
E-Mail: bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com

Ronald Neiwirth, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq.
[REDACTED] & Burnett, P.A.
777 S. Flagler Dr., Ste 901
W. Palm Beach, FL 334016170
Email: [REDACTED]
rneiwirth@[REDACTED]

Ira Sochet, Trustee (VIA EMAIL)
Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet
c/o Phil Hudson, Esq.
200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600
Miami, Florida 33130
Telephone: (305) 374-3330
Facsimile: (305) 374-4744
E-Mail: pmhudson@arnstein.com

Coquina Investments (VIA EMAIL)
c/o Patricia A. Redmond, Esq.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33130
Telephone: (305) 789-3553
Facsimile: (305) 789-3395
E-Mail: predmond@stearnsweaver.com

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR

CHAPTER I I

AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE PRODUCTION FROM TRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Movant, L.M., moves this Court pursuant to II U §I05(a), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 7026 (which expressly inco .R.Civ. P. 26(c)), and L.R. 7026-1 to request that the Court enter a protectiv (t d e uding the Trustee's production of any documents to Jeffrey Epstein because S Sod e d documents are subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege and/or attorney rk pr uct, and in support thereof, states as follows:

  • 4 14/c
  • I. Jeffrey Epstein, throiCti ounsel, seeks to pull the wool over the eyes of this honorable Court. Eps ' asks this Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the Circuit Court ov subp t na duces tecum issued by the state court in connection with an action pending be e s e court.
  • 2. 4av , L.M., respectfully requests that this honorable Court enter a protective order, ,...\_\_ consisteltt with the document production methodology already ordered by the Court [D.E. 672], deny Epstein's motion to compel, and prevent the Trustee's production to Epstein of any documents or ESI sought through his state court subpoena since such production consists entirely of documents and ESI which are subject to proper claims of attorney-client communications

I. Introduction

privilege and/or attorney work product.

II. Background

3. Movant, L.M. is a party plaintiff in a civil lawsuit' against party defendant Jeffrey Epstein in which she alleges that Epstein sexually exploited, abused, and/or assaulted her when she was a minors. The parties recently reached a confidential settlement of this lawsuit on the eve of trial.

4. Movant's counsel, Brad was employed by RRA. Duriag 'lime Attorney ti securely and confidentially maintained hard-copies of &tarn e materials and maintained substantial parts of client case files and investig and other software systems maintained by RRA.2 es in the Qtask application

5. This Court has entered other Orders in t ' a jt 9"preserve the privileges of RBA's former clients. See Order Granting Motion fo ASts et , Order, D.E. 672.

6. Epstein filed a lawsuit against S W. hstein, L.M.'s counsel Brad S and L.M. individually.3 Epstein has s to ve up his meritless claims against Attorney and L.M., in part, b his Fifth Amendment privilege in deposition in this case seventy-seven times."

7. On April, 201 Epstein's counsel had a subpoena duces tecwn issued from the Circuit

' L. M. v. E CasTe #08-CA-2805 I, 15ih Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Brad is plaintiff's counsel in this lawsuit. Epstein was also a party defe 'ozens of other civil lawsuits prosecuted by other woman who allege that Epstein

sexua exp oited, abused, and/or assaulted them when they were minors.

2 See Motion for Protective Order to Exclude Production of Privileged Documents and

Testimony from Qtask, Inc. (D.E. 355].

3 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al, Case #09-CA-040800-MBAG, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm

Beach County, Florida.

\*Dep. Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein v. Rothstein, et al., March 17, 2010, p. 6 - 128.

2

Court in Epstein v. Rothstein, et at seeking production from Trustee Herbert Stettin of Attorney case files and investigative files which relate to L.M. and his other legitimate clients who possessed bona fide claims or potential claims against Epstein.

  • 8. On June 18, 2010, L.M., through counsel, filed objections to the subpoena in the Circuit Court.
  • 9. Likewise, L.M. filed a motion for protective order in the Circuit Court th bject subpoena had been issued.
  • 10. In addition, the Trustee filed a motion for protective order in t Circui ourt.
  • II. Thereafter, the Circuit Court entered an agreed orde ese motions for protective order protecting privileged and work product materials f ion to Epstein. ursue the discovery of privileged and attorney work product materials which ASic Court would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel, DE 807.
  • 12. Now, Epstein has come to the Bankruptcy,

111. Memorandum of Law

A. Discovery Issnes Belated to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court

Despite Epstein' d position to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 confer jurisdiction on h onorable Court to adjudicate a discovery matter arising purely under state law claj n state court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to per o a d run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the honorable Circuit Court has already ruled on a motion for protective order on the subject state court issued subpoena duces teem. Accordingly, for reasons of comity, this honorable Court should deny

Epstein's motion to compel.

B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorney Work Product and Beyond the Permissible Scope of Discovery

Privileges are invoked by the client who possesses the privilege or by the attorney on behalf of the client.

i. Scope of Permissible Discovery

Rule 26(b) excludes privileged matters from the scope of permissible di

seeks the production of documents from clients' privileged case files a These documents are beyond the scope of discovery permitted by Rul 26(b) tive files.

ii. Protective Orders

Rule 26(c) states that a court may protect a party sought, based on "good cause shown:" m whom discovery is

A party or any person from whom protective order in the court where on matters relating to a depos deposition will be taken. movant has in good faith parties in an effort to for good cause, issue embarrassment, opp more of the foll • 8s , 14/e is sought may move for a tion pending — or as an alternative e court for the district where the must include a certification that the attempted to confer with other affected ispute without court action. The court may, o protect a party or person from annoyance, or undue burden or expense, including one or

  • c•( rbid g the disclosure or discovery; ifying terms, including time and place, for the disclosure or co ry; prescribing a discovery method other than the one selected by the rty seeking discovery;
  • (D) forbidding inquiry into certain matters, or limiting the scope of disclosure or discovery to certain matters;
  • (E) designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted;
  • (F) requiring that a deposition be sealed and opened only on court order,

(G) requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way; and

(H) requiring that the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information in sealed envelopes, to be opened as the court directs.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)

Epstein seeks the production from the Trustee of privileged, confidential, a attorney work product materials from the case files and investigative files of L.M. and die s who possess claims against Epstein. The requested documents, relating to t de cases of clients are not relevant or calculated to lead to the discovery of admis ble evr nce in the instant bankruptcy action or any adversary proceeding presently b his Court. Therefore, the requested documents are beyond the scope of permissib The requested materials arc not discoverable under the Florida Rules of it dure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Bankruptcy Rules of Civil Pr hs, any other possibly applicable system of rules. Moreover, the document produc ' met ology established by order of this Court was ( s od not intended to be a conduit of RQ iv' ,I, e and work product of RRA's former clients to the clients' litigation adversaries. E s counsel distorts and misrepresents the purpose of the document production n ology by arguing that it was created to facilitate such improper discovery.

Eps Sou ntel further attempts to skirt the issue of privilege by failing to meaningfully ti ( identif thcriature of the requested materials, other than describing "email? and documents "other th n emails". The materials requested by Epstein, essentially case files, client files, and At investigative files are patently and obviously privileged. Epstein's counsel offers no argument, cognizable under any set of possibly applicable rules, to demonstrate entitlement to these privileged and work product materials.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, Epstein is not permitted to obtain production of documents and ESI from the Trustee which comprise the privileged, confidential, or attorney work product portions of case files or investigative files, and Movant requests that the Court deny Epstein's motion to compel, grant the foregoing motion for protective order, and enter a protective order excluding the production of any documents or ESI by the Trustee whic relate to any cases or matter of L.M. or other clients and granting any other relief tJieiCou deems appropriate to protect the clients of Jaffe Weissing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(E i4q t's counsel has contacted Epstein's counsel in a good faith attempt to resolve tter without a hearing and I further certify that a true and correct copy of the forego g as ed on electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, Ire t e , all CM/ECF subscribers, and by or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on t S a tpci h service list this 19th day of July, 2010.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I ita emme dmit to the Bar of the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florid in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth 4r Local 'Rule 2090-I(A).

JAFFE, WEISSING, FIST0S & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)524-2820 Telephone (954)524-2822 Facsimile

By: /s/Seth Lehrman

Seth Lehrman FLBN 132896 seth(iD.mithtoiustice.corn

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Marianella Morales, Esquire (VIA EMAIL)
Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors
Avenida Francisco de Miranda
Torre Provincial "A"
Piso 8
Caracas, Venezuela

John H. Genovese, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
Robert F. Elgidely, Esq.
Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA
Bank Of America Tower at International
Place
100 S.E. 2nd Street
Suite 4400
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 349-2300
Fax (305) 349-2310

Kendall Coffey, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Coffey Burlington,
Office in the Grove
Penthouse
2699 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com

Hon. Herbert M. Stettin (VIA EMAIL)
One Biscayne Tower
Suite 3700
Two South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131

John G. Bianco, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
John M. Mulli, Esquire
Tripp Scott
110 Southeast Sixth Street
Fifteenth Floor
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
jgb@trippscott.com

Alison W. Lehr (VIA EMAIL)
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street
7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 961-9176
Fax: (305) 536-7599
Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov

Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA
401 East Las Olas Boulevard
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
srosenfeldt@rra-law.com

Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Sonn & Erez, PLC
Broward Financial Center
500 E. Broward Boulevard
Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
Phone: (954) 763-4700
Fax (954) 763-1866
jsonn@sonnerez.com

Office of the US Trustee (VIA CM/ECF)
51 Southwest First Avenue
Suite 1204
Miami, Florida 33130

[REDACTED] Tew, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
[REDACTED] Maynard Gollin, Esq.
Tew-[REDACTED], LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131-3407
tt@tewlaw.com
lmg@tewlaw.com

Conrad & Scherer, LLP (VIA EMAIL)
633 South Federal Highway
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: 954-462-5500
bs@conradscherer.com
JSilver@conradscherer.com

Michael D. Seese, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP
1 E Broward Blvd Ste 1010
Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Tel: 954.4677900
Fax: 954.4671024
mseese@hinshawlaw.com

Internal Revenue Service
Centralized Insolvency Operations
P.O. Box 21126
Philadelphia, PA 19114
(Via U.S. Mail)

Internal Revenue Service
Special Procedures - Insolvency
7850 SW 6th Court
Plantation, FL 33324
Tel.: (954) 423-7300
Fax.: (305) 982-5406
(Via U.S. Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000
51 SW 1st Avenue, #1114
Miami, FL 33130
Fax: (305) 530-7139
(Via U.S. Mail)

Grant J. Smith, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
401 East Las Olas Blvd
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
gsmith@rra-law.com

United Healthcare
Dept. CH 10151
Palatine, IL 60055
(Via US Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
IRS District Counsel
1000 S. Pine Island Rd., Ste 340
Plantation, FL 33324-3906
(Via U.S. Mail)

The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Attorney General of the U.S.
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 4400
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(Via U.S. Mail)

Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman,
Acting U.S. Attorney
99 NE 4th Street
Miami, FL 33132
(Via U.S. Mail)

Daniel Mink
Ovadia Levy
c/o Renato Watches, Inc
14051 NW 14th Street
Sunrise, Florida 33323
(Via U.S. Mail)

William [REDACTED] Salim, Jr. (VIA CM/ECF)
Moskowitz Mandell & Salim
800 Corporate Dr Ste 510
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334
wsalim@mmsslaw.com
Tel: 954.491-2000
Fax: 954.4912051

USI (VIA EMAIL)
Attn: Anthony Gruppo
200 West Cypress Creek Road
Suite 500
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Tel: 954-607-4000
Anthony.gruppo@usi.biz

Marc Nurik, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.
401 East Las Olas Blvd
Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
mnurik@rra-law.com

BAST AMRON LLP (VIA CM/ECF)
SunTrust International Center
One Southeast Third Avenue
Suite 1440
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 379-7904
Facsimile: (305) 379-7905
bamron@bastamron.com
jbast@bastamron.com

Mark Bloom, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1221 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
T 305.579.0500
F 305.579.0717
bloomm@gtlaw.com

Robert D. Critton, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
rcrit@bclclaw.com

Roth & Scholl (VIA EMAIL)
Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq.
Attorneys For Creditor Blue
Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P.
866 South Dixie Highway
Coral Gables, FL 33146
Telephone: (305) 662-4141
jeff@rothandscholl.com

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP (VIA EMAIL)
1401 East Broward Blvd
Suite 300

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: (954) 462-1431
Fax: (954) 763-2692
mfbooth@rmzlaw.com

Arthur C. Neiwirth, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF)
One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1400
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Tel: (954) 523-7008
Fax: (954) 523-7009
aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com

The Florida Bar (VIA EMAIL)
Adria E. Quintela, Esq.
Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq.
Lake Shore Plaza II
1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130
Sunrise, FL 33323
aquintel@flabar.org
apascal@flabar.org

Micheal w. Moskowitz, Esq. (VIA E-MAIL)
800 Corporate Drive, Suite 500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33234
mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com

Francis L. Carter, Esq. (VIA E-MAIL)
Katz Barron Squitero Faust
2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33133
Tel: 305-856-2444
Fax: 305-285-9227
flc@katzbarron.com

██████████ S. Shraiberg, Esq. (VIA EMAIL)
2385 NW Executive Drive
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Tel: 561-443-0800
Fax: 561-998-0047
bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com

Henry S. Wiff (VIA EMAIL) CARLTON P.A. 525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 659-7070 Facsimile: (561) 659-7368 E-Mail: hwulfigcarltonfields.com

EMESS Capital, LLC (VIA EMAIL) do Bruce A. Katzen, Esq. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 379-9000 Facsimile: (305) 379-3428 E-Mail: bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com

Ronald Neiwirth, Esq. (VIA EMAIL) L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. & Burnett, P.A. 777 S. Flagler Dr. ,Ste 901 E W. Palm Beach FL 334016170 Email:

( S'A i

Sochet, Trustee (VIA EMAIL) Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 374-3330 Facsimile: (305) 374-4744 E-Mail: pmhudson@amstein.com

Coquina Investments (VIA E do Patricia A. Redmond, 150 West Flagler Street, Sd 00 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 7 Facsimile: (305) E-Mail: predmon sweaver.com

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 13, 2010.

Raymond B. Ray, Judge
United States Bankruptcy Court

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

CHAPTER 11

Debtor.
\_\_\_\_\_

ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on August 4, 2010 upon (i) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.E. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos and Lehrman, P.L. (“[REDACTED], Jaffe”) (D.E. #818) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises,

DOES HEREBY ORDER:

I. The Court appoints former Broward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney as Special who shall work with counsel for the Trustee to obtain documents responsive to the subpoena served upon the Trustee by Jeffrey Epstein to: (i) review all electronically stored information ("ESP') and other documents in the Trustee's possession, including Qta data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work produ Act 'vile that may inure to the benefit of LM., Brad and other current or for n ofe Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) p privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law.

2. Prior to engaging in this document revie t ial shall meet with counsel for Epstein, counsel for =, Jaffe and 's se e Trustee to hear their respective positions concerning these matters. Upon c S • n f the review by the Special the Special shall prepare and file a "lege g with the Court. No documents or ESI shall be released to anyone until such Special has notified the Court that he has concluded his review of the documents and is in a position to report to the Court his findings and to obtain er instruction. Upon the filing of such notice by the Special =, the Court shall cont ed hearing on the pending motions identified above. All legal fees and costs i e Special shall be paid by Epstein, who has agreed to pay directly all s costs.

###

Submitted by:

Charles H. Lichtman, Esq.

BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A.,

350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 525-9900

Facsimile: (914) 523-2872

clichtman@bergersingerman.com

Copy furnished to: tp ic CO %

Charles H. Lichtman, Esq.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.fisb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA.,'

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-34791 -RBR

CHAPTER I I

MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL

Robert B. Carney, this Court's appointed Special by O ugust 13, 2010 [D.E. #888], moves for clarification of the above referenc in the following material respects2:

  • I. Does Paragraph I of the Order entlfie Special alone prepare a privilege log?

Discussion: While a first blush din t he Order would seem to indicate that the Special solely would pre e ' ilege log, this likely would create appellate issues later in the civil action. A stri would preclude Messieurs and not only from seeing the docum IZ illar but from having any hand in asserting the privilege that is theirs to ;erp tation would permit them only to argue the privileges asserted by the . B th could not see the documents, the , alone, would decide which document hat privilege. Your Special is not aware of any case law or rule that would s rt such an interpretation and felt it prudent to bring this to the court's attention.

I The address and last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., is 6600 NW 16th Street, Suite I I. 7961).

2 The content of this motion was written b the Special =. However, the Trustee's counsel was asked to format and file this motion for the Special who is not on this Court's Electronic Filing System. Submission of this motion by Trustee's counsel does mean that the Trustee takes a position on the issues raised herein.

Suggestion: That the Order appointing Special and be clarified to insure that Messieurs have the opportunity to review the documents and themselves make the decision regarding whether to assert a privilege. Since your Special would also have the documents any concerns of loss or tampering should be alleviated.

2. Does Paragraph 2 of the order envision that the job of the Special Masterend with the preparation of the Privilege Log?

Discussion: Once the privilege log is prepared the next step would each privilege and the context in which it asserted as well as the opp it~m review of s why it should not exist or why it should be abrogated. A strict reading o Order would terminate the I V function of the Special upon completion of t 'n log and would leave the SIC rI' Bankruptcy Court with the task of sorting out the d conducting hearings relative to the privileges. Since this is in the context of \ co civil action involving matters arguably outside the interest of the Bankruptcy 'ght be more efficient for the arguments to be made to the Special tt Special recommendations to the Bank oge regarding disposition. then including in his report

Suggestion: Th the Order conducting a heerfltg re rding Report of privileges s and the recommended disposition of these claims. appointing Special be clarified to encompass privileges asserted by Messieurs and The would include the arguments from both sides regarding any

Special has met with attorneys Lichtman, M, =, and separately and together. Not all attorneys are in agreement with either the Request for Clarification or the suggestions of the Special outlined above which is the reason for requesting this hearing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and that 1 am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoin se via Regular U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, fax, email and/or overnight delivery, i c d, upon all parties on the attached Service List this 20th day of September, 2010.

Dated: September 20, 2010. Respectfully su

BERGE % AN, P.A. Alto hapter 11 Trustee 350 as Boulevard, Suite 1000 ale, FL 33301 ph e: (954) 712-5138 p: (954) 525-9900 simile: (954) 523-2872

By: /s/ Charles H. Lichtman

Charles H. Lichtman clichtman@bergersineerman.com Florida Bar No. 501050

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Marianella Morales, Esquire
Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors
Avenida Francisco de Miranda
Torre Provincial "A"
Piso 8
Caracas, Venezuela
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

John H. Genovese, Esq.
Robert F. Elgidely, Esq.
Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA
Bank Of America Tower at International
Place
100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 4400
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Kendall Coffey, Esq.
Coffey Burlington,
Office in the Grove
Penthouse
2699 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

The Honorable Herbert M. Stettin
One Biscayne Tower
Suite 3700
Two South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA U.S. MAIL and EMAIL)

John G. Bianco, Esq.
John M. Mulli, Esquire
Tripp Scott
110 Southeast Sixth Street
Fifteenth Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301
jgb@trippscott.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Alison W. Lehr, Esq.
Grisel Alonso, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33132
Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov
Grisel.alonso@usdoj.gov
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq.
Sonn & Erez, PLC
Broward Financial Center
500 E. Broward Boulevard
Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
jsonn@sonnerez.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Office of the US Trustee
51 Southwest First Avenue
Suite 1204
Miami, Florida 33130
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

[REDACTED] Tew, Esq.
Tew-[REDACTED], LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131-3407
tt@tewlaw.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Conrad & Scherer, LLP
633 South Federal Highway
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
bs@conradscherer.com
JSilver@conradscherer.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael EX Seese, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP I E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 mseese@hinshawlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail)

Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 (Via U.S. Mall)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW 1st Avenue, #1114 Miami, Fl 33130 (Via U.S. Mail)

United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Atto IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Isla d., She 340 Plantation, FL 3906 (Via U.S.

€ric H. Holder, Jr. eral of the U.S. Ivania Avenue, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 (Via U.S. Mail)

SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting U.S. Attorney 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Fl 33132 (Via U.S. Mail)

Daniel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, Inc 14051 NW 14th Street Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mail)

William Sa Moskowitz Mand 800 Corporate Dr Fort Laude wsalim@ (VI orida 33334 v.com and EMAIL)

H Anthony Gruppo est Cypress Creek Road ite 500 \* 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Anthonv.aruppo@usi.biz (VIA EMAIL)

Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc @nu ri k law.com (VIA EMAIL)

BAST AMRON LLP SunTrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 1440 Miami, Florida 33131 bamron@bastamron.com ibast@bastamron.com (VIA CIWECF and EMAIL)

CASE SERVICE LIST NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Mark Bloom, Esq John B. Hutton, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, LLP 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 bloomm@atlaw.com huttoni@mlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert D. Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 rcrit@belclaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Roth & Scholl Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq. Attorneys For Creditor Blue Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P. 866 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, Fl 33146 ieff@rothandscholl.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP 1401 East Broward Blvd Suite 300 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 mfbooth@rmzlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and E )

Arthur C. Neiw One E. Brow ., Suite 1400 Ft. Laude 3 01 aneiwinb qpwb w.com (VIA CM/EC nd EMAIL)

The Florida Bar Adria E. Quintela, Esq. Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq. Lake Shore Plaza II 1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130 Sunrise, FL 33323 pquintel @flabar.org apascal@flabar.org A (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Micheal W. Moskowitz, 800 Corporate Drive, Suite Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 mm' owitz @mm (VIA CM/ECF a

Francis L. Katz B 2699 Esq. ero Faust Drive, 7th Floor 33133 CF and EMAIL)

S. Shraiberg, Esq. 2385 NW Executive Drive Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 bshraiberx @ sfl-oa.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Henry S. WCIA. CARLTON P.A. 525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 E-Mail: hwulf@carltonfields.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

EMESS Capital, LLC do Bruce A. Katzen, Esq. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 E-Mail: bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com iberman@klugerkaplan.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Ira Sochet, Trustee
Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet
c/o Phil Hudson, Esq.
200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: pmhudson@arnstein.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. [REDACTED], Esq.
Gray [REDACTED], P.A.
1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 1600
Miami, Florida 33131
E-Mail - [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Coquina Investments
c/o Patricia A. Redmond, Esq.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: predmond@stearnsweaver.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Peter F. Valori, Esq.
DAMIAN & VALORI LLP
1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1020
Miami, FL 33131
E-mail: pvalori@dvllp.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.
Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600
350 East Las Olas Blvd
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: Michael.goldberg@akerman.com
Eyal.berger@akerman.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Canon Financial Services, Inc.
158 Gaither Drive, #200
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
(Via US Mail)
CIT Technology Financing Services I,
LLC
10201 Centurion Parkway North
Jacksonville, FL 32256
(Via US Mail)

LMB Funding Group
c/o Robert C. Furr, Esq.
2255 Glades Road, Suite 337W
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
E-Mail: rfurr@furrcohen.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust
Company
220 Alhambra Circle, Suite 500
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(Via US Mail)

[REDACTED] A. Gordich, Esq.
Melissa Alagna, Esq.
SEGALL/GORDICH P.A.
801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900
Miami, Florida 33131
Email: lag@segallgordich.com
Email: mma@segallgordich.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc.
1140 West Loop North
Houston, TX 77055
(Via US Mail)

Broward County
Attn: Hollie N. Hawn, Esq.
Government Center
115 South Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: hhawn@broward.org
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Florida Department of Revenue
501 S. Calhoun Street
Room 201
Carlton Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(Via US Mail)

A SERVICE LIST E NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street Suite 210 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Via US Mail)

Miami-Dade County Tax Collectors 140 West Hagler Street, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via US Mail)

Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 (Via US Mail)

THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. ITTLEMAN, P.A. 440 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (Via US Mail)

Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via US Mail)

F. McGinn, Esq. Bartlett Feinberg, P. 155 Federal Street, 9thFloor Boston, 02110 ffm@bostonbusinessla (VIA CM/ECF L)

Darol H. 99 Nesb' Punta Go a, 33950 dean- (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 bee@blankrome.com (VIA EMAIL)

Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121 Boca Raton, FL. 33432 rfc@colemanattomevs.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Mark S. Haltzman, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone, LLC 3600 Horizon Blvd, Suite 200 Trevose, PA 19053 mhaltzman@lammrubensto R m (VIA CM/ECF and EMA

Robert C. Buschel 100 S.E. Third A Fort Lauderdale, buschel@ (VIA 94

Beilio tmio ck Pollack & Brant \si rt ublic Accountants & Consultants, 2 Biscayne Boulevard, Sixth Floor iami, FL 33131-2310 Attn: Richard Pollack (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

MELAND RUSSIN & BUDWICK, P.A. 3000 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Attn: James C. Moon, Esq. imoon@melandrussin.com Attn: Peter D. Russin, Esq. prussin@melandrussin.com Attn: Michael S. Budwick, Esq. mbudwick@melandrussin.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Gary S. Blake, Esq. 1499 W. Palmetto Park Rd Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33486 gblakc@lalaw.net (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Melinda S. Thornton, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney
County Attorney's Office
2810 Stephen P. Clark Center
111 N.W. First Street
Miami, FL 33128-1993
Email: cao.bkc@miamidade.gov
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

SLATKIN & [REDACTED], P.A.
Attorneys for [REDACTED] Adler and Katie Adler
One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 609
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone 954.745.5880
Facsimile 954.745.5890
jslatkin@slatkinreynolds.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

ASSOULINE & BERLOWE, P.A.
213 East Sheridan Street, Ste. 3
Dania Beach, FL 33004
Attn: Eric N. Assouline, Esq.
ena@assoulineberlowe.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. Reisman, Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST,
COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: sreisman@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Turner P. Smith, Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST,
COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: tsmith@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Maryann Gallagher, Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST,
COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: mgallagher@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

ILEANA CRUZ BONGINI, ESQ.
icruz@stearnsweaver.com
STEARNS WEAVER [REDACTED]
WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON,
P.A.
Coquina Investments
Museum Tower, Suite 2200
150 West Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33130
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

[REDACTED] Maynard Gollin
lgollin@gordonrees.com
Gordon & Rees LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Paul J. McMahon, Esq.
Paul [REDACTED] McMahon, P.A.
2840 S.W. Third Ave
Miami, Florida 33129
pjm@pjmlawmiami.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert P. Avolio, Esq.
Crossroads Corporate Center
3150 Brunswick Pike, Ste. 120
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
ravolio@avoliohanlon.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Mark S. Shipman, Esq.
20 Batterson Park Road, Suite 120
Farmington, CT 06032
mark@shipso.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Heather L. Ries, Esq.
Fox Rothschild, LLP
222 Lakeview Ave, Suite 700
West Palm Beach, Fl 33401
hries@foxrothschild.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

NOTA CERTIFIED COPY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www. flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-3479 I -RBR

CHAPTER II

A

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE PRODUCTION FROM TRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Movant, J. IMM moves this Court pursu 11 U.S.C. §105(a), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 7026 (which expr rates Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(c)), and L.R. 7026-1 to request that the Court enter AS ibisE ct v e order excluding the Trustee's production of any documents or information Aftic served on Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Ba ptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") because all requested u e are subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege and/or attorney work product, nd finis port thereof, states as follows: pstein in the Deposition Duces Tecum

I. Introduction

  • I. Jeffrey ein (" STEIN"), through his counsel, seeks to pull the wool over the eyes of this honora ts Epstein asks this Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the A< Circuit ;...C t . r a subpoena duces tecum issued by the state court in connection with an action pending fore the state court.
  • 2. Movant,
  • J. (" i') respectfully requests that this honorable Court enter a protective order, consistent with the document production methodology already ordered by the Court [D.E. 6721, deny Epstein's motion to compel, and prevent the Trustee's production to Epstein of any documents or ESI sought through his state court subpoena since

such production consists entirely of documents and ESI which are subject to proper claims of attorney-client communications privilege and/or attorney work product.

II. Background

3. was legal counsel for several young females that were molested by EPSTEIN and is currently legal counsel for additional females who were molested by STEIN.

4. filed lawsuits against EPSTEIN on behalf of three female, and Jane Doe, who were molested by EPSTEIN numerous times when they w a oi¢rg as 13 and 14 years old. Each of those lawsuits was originally filed in August o Septe r of 2008, while was a sole practitioner.

5. In or about March or April of 2009, o work at RRA, and as such he took his cases, which included cases against EP AS S a, with him.

6. In November 2009, RRA collapsed a 't s discovered that the firm's president, Scott Rothstein, was running a Ponzi sc e an herwise engaging in criminal activity.

7. a, and the vast ajgrit f RRA attorneys and employees, were unaware of Rothstein's criminal activity.

8. EPSTEIN, in a R S,STE , and LM, alleging that there was a conspiracy to fabricate cases against hi din the case filed on behalf of LM. Notwithstanding the foregoing, EPSTEIN has settle lfsdits filed by to date, paying significant sums to resolve said cases. Prior to tling these cases, EPSTEIN was deposed in the underlying litigation filed by the child victims, and in this case, and in all depositions he has asserted his 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Despite all the foregoing, EPSTEIN has filed his frivolous claims against and his client. brt to exploit Rothstein's criminal activity, filed a lawsuit against

9. EPSTEIN served a deposition duces tecum on Herbert Stettin, trustee for RRA, requesting documents and information that are clearly protected by attorney-client and work product privilege and/or which are the private property of or his clients or request information that is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

10. Epstein is attempting to use his lawsuit against as a vehicle to ierce the attorney-client and work product privileges and gain access to privileged info ' n r ated to civil actions against him.

II. Epstein served Requests for Production on I=. that overy requested identical information to that sought by the duces tecum served wig bert tettin.

12. Appropriate work product and attorney-client pi' ilgge ections were made to those requests and responses were provided where there no ion.

13. The Trustee for RRA is merely the c s Sseis , these records and stands in the shoes of the former RRA attorneys and clientiss such as this; in other words, the Trustee, I=M, LM and all other c ist11 y,...) a former clients arc essentially one and the same for purposes of attorney-client d wor product issues. Therefore, EPSTEIN cannot request discovery from the RRA.r. rustee to circumvent any privilege already claimed by or his clients or too am information to which he is not entitled under the Rules.

14. EP Q i se a hearing on his Motion to Compel production of these materials before Judge Cr , Court in which this case is pending.

15. or to Judge hearing that Motion, an agreement was reached amongst the parties (including Trustee) that the materials responsive to the requests would be turned over by the Trustee to appropriate objections. and that would then file a privilege log or make other

16. EPSTEIN's counsel said he would prepare the Agreed Order to that effect but failed to do so.

17. EPSTEIN has now argued his entitlement to these documents before this Bankruptcy Court.

18. counsel understands that a Special Judge Robert Carney ,,has been appointed and delegated certain duties to monitor Electronically Stored Inforrnition to%sist in the preparation of a privilege log.

19. The discovery Epstein is seeking should not be allowed as it not cj3i r overable because it is irrelevant and/or clearly protected by privilege.

20. The discovery requested also contains inform o t is the private property of or his clients.

21. An objection and Amended Motion fo ct Order [D.E. 819] was lodged on behalf of LM, invoking certain privileges, and ons on behalf of and his current clients should also be recognize b t Court. adopts and incorporates by reference herein the Amende Motign or Protective Order filed by LM, but also asserts his own attorney-client and wo lawsuit. oduct privileges as he is a named Defendant in EPSTEIN's frivolous

22. Whileitt ns on behalf of have already been made before Judge who is pr 14/t Im' gl over this case, this Court should be aware of EPSTEIN's attempt to backdoor his way into obtaining information to which he is not entitled.

III. Memorandum of Law

A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court

Despite Epstein's stated position to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 confer jurisdiction on this honorable Court to adjudicate a discovery matter arising purely under state law claims filed in state court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the onorable Circuit Court has already ruled on a motion for protective order on the subject cou ued subpoena duces tecum. Accordingly, for reasons of comity, this honors ould deny Epstein's motion to compel.

B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorse Vork Product and Beyond the Permissible Scope of Discovery

Privileges are invoked by the client who po vilege or by the attorney on behalf of the client.

i. Scope of Permissib coy

Rule 26(b) excludes privilege rom the scope of permissible discovery. Epstein seeks the production of docu c gi clients' privileged case files and investigative files. These documents are beyond t m of discovery permitted by Rule 26(b).

ii. P e Orders

Rule 2 c tes that a court may protect a party or person from whom discovery is sought, good cause shown:"

or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a p tective order in the court where the action is pending — or as an alternative on matters relating to a deposition, in the court for the district where the deposition will be taken. The motion must include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance,

embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following:

  • (A) forbidding the disclosure or discovery;
  • (B) specifying terms, including time and place, for the disclosure or discovery;
  • (C) prescribing a discovery method other than the one selected by the party seeking discovery;
  • (D) forbidding inquiry into certain matters, or limiting the scope of 4, disclosure or discovery to certain matters; 4., ji
  • (E) designating the persons who may be present while the discov s \*s conducted;
  • (F) requiring that a deposition be sealed and opened order; . (G) requiring that a trade secret or other confid esearch, development, or commercial information noy1 revealed or be revealed only in a specified way; and
  • (H) requiring that the parties simultaneou /-• cified documents or information in sealed envelopes, to the court directs.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)

Epstein seeks the production from 4rus e of privileged, confidential, and attorney work product materials. The reques e nts, relating to the bona fide cases of clients are not relevant or calculated to lea o e discovery of admissible evidence in the instant bankruptcy action or any ad ar9 proceeding presently before this Court. Therefore, the requested documents ar d the scope of permissible discovery. The requested materials are not discov under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu e, nkruptcy Rules of Civil Procedure or any other possibly applicable system of rules o bver, the document production methodology established by order of this Court was not intended to be a conduit of privileged and work product of RRA's former clients to the clients' litigation adversaries. Epstein's counsel distorts and misrepresents the purpose of the document production methodology by arguing that it was created to facilitate such improper

discovery.

Epstein's counsel further attempts to skin the issue of privilege by failing to meaningfully identify the nature of the requested materials, other than describing "email?" and documents "other than emails". The materials requested by Epstein, essentially case files, client files, and investigative files are patently and obviously privileged. Epstein's counsel offers no rgument, cognizable under any set of possibly applicable rules, to demonstrate entiyerppnt these privileged and work product materials.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, Epstein is not permitted to obtain production of documents and ESI from the Trustee which comprise the pr' d, confidential, or attorney deny Epstein's motion to compel, grant the foreg 4 5 for protective order, and enter a work product portions of case files or investigative Ill ant requests that the Court protective order excluding the production of a its'4111:1 u L, ts or ESI by the Trustee which relate to any cases or matter of el' s a granting any other relief the Court deems appropriate.

I HEREBY CERT! Yet pursuant to L.R. 9073-I(D), Movant's counsel has contacted Epstein's cou I in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter without a hearing and I further certify th ra true d correct copy of the foregoing was served on electronically to the examinee, bto the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CM/ECF subscribers, and by email or il on those parties listed on the attached service list this 27th day of September, 2010.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

+o

/s/ Seth M. Lehrman

Seth M. Lehrman

seth@pathtojustice.com

Florida Bar No.: 132896

M AFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.

425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

(954) 524-2820

(954) 524-2822 (fax)

Jack Scarola AS Florida Bar No.: 169440

Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Shipley

2139 Palm Beach Lakes

West Palm Beach 409

(561) 686-6300

(561)684-58,

Attorney foSEos I in the matter of

Epstei n v:-.E r s, et al.

Cas\ t 02 9CA040800XXXCMBAG

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Marianella Morales, Esquire
Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors
Avenida Francisco de Miranda
Torre Provincial "A"
Piso 8
Caracas, Venezuela
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

John H. Genovese, Esq.
Robert F. Elgidely, Esq.
Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA
Bank Of America Tower at International
Place
100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 4400
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Kendall Coffey, Esq.
Coffey Burlington,
Office in the Grove
Penthouse
2699 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

The Honorable Herbert M. Stettin
One Biscayne Tower
Suite 3700
Two South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA U.S. MAIL and EMAIL)

John G. Bianco, Esq.
John M. Mulli, Esquire
Tripp Scott
110 Southeast Sixth Street
Fifteenth Floor
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
jgb@trippscott.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Alison W. Lehr, Esq.
Grisel Alonso, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33132
Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov
Grisel.alonso@usdoj.gov
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq.
Sonn & Erez, PLC
Broward Financial Center
500 E. Broward Boulevard
Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
jsonn@sonnerez.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Office of the US Trustee
51 Southwest First Avenue
Suite 1204
Miami, Florida 33130
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

[REDACTED] Tew, Esq.
Tew- [REDACTED], LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131-3407
tt@tewlaw.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Conrad & Scherer, LLP
633 South Federal Highway
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
bs@conradscherer.com
JSilver@conradscherer.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael D. Seese, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP I E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 mseese@hinshawlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail)

Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 (Via U.S. Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW 1st Avenue, #11I4 Miami, Fl 33130 (Via U.S. Mail)

United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Atto IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Isla Rd., 340 Plantation, FL 3906 (Via U.S.

Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting U.S. Attorney 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Fl 33132 (Via U.S. Mail)

Daniel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, Inc 14051 NW 14th Street Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mail)

William Sali Moskowitz Mandell 800 Corporate Dr St Fort Lauderd wsalim@ (VIA rida 33334 om d EMAIL)

ake'i ony Gruppo st Cypress Creek Road stl i. 500 on Lauderdale, FL 33309 Astme e Anthony.gruppo®usi.biz (VIA EMAIL)

The Hon 91RLric H. Holder, Jr. Att eral of the U.S. 950 Pen lvania Avenue, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 (Via U.S. Mail)

Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc@nuriklaw.com (VIA EMAIL)

BAST AMRON LLP SunTrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 1440 Miami, Florida 33131 bamron@bastamron.com jbast@bastamron.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Mark Bloom, Esq.
John B. Hutton, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1221 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
bloomm@gtlaw.com
huttonj@gtlaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert D. Critton, Esq.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
rcrit@bclclaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Roth & Scholl
Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq.
Attorneys For Creditor Blue
Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P.
866 South Dixie Highway
Coral Gables, FL 33146
jeff@rothandscholl.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP
1401 East Broward Blvd
Suite 300
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
mfbooth@rmzlaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Arthur C. Neiwirth, Esq.
One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1400
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

The Florida Bar
Adria E. Quintela, Esq.
Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq.
Lake Shore Plaza II
1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130
Sunrise, FL 33323
aquintel@flabar.org
apascal@flabar.org

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Micheal W. Moskowitz, Esq.
800 Corporate Drive, Suite 500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33234
mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Francis L. Carter, Esq.
Katz Barron Squitero Faust
2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33133
flc@katzbarron.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Bradley S. Shraiberg, Esq.
2385 NW Executive Drive
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Henry S. Wulf, Esq.
CARLTON [REDACTED], P.A.
525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
E-Mail: hwulf@carltonfields.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

EMESS Capital, LLC
c/o Bruce A. Katzen, Esq.
201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
E-Mail: bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com
jberman@klugerkaplan.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Ira Sochet, Trustee
Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet
c/o Phil Hudson, Esq.
200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: pmhudson@arnstein.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Coquina Investments
c/o Patricia A. Redmond, Esq.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: predmond@stearnsweaver.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.
Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600
350 East Las Olas Blvd
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: Michael.goldberg@akerman.com
Eyal.berger@akerman.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

LMB Funding Group
c/o Robert C. Furr, Esq.
2255 Glades Road, Suite 337W
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
E-Mail: rfurr@furrcohen.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

██████████ A. Gordich, Esq.
Melissa Alagna, Esq.
SEGALL/GORDICH P.A.
801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900
Miami, Florida 33131
Email: lag@segallgordich.com
Email: mma@segallgordich.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Broward County - Attn: Hollie N. Hawn, Esq.
Government Center
115 South Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: hhawn@broward.org
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. ██████████, Esq.
Gray ██████████, P.A.
1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 1600
Miami, Florida 33131
E-Mail - ██████████ - ██████████
com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Peter F. Valori, Esq.
DAMIAN & VALORI LLP
1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1020
Miami, FL 33131
E-mail: pvalori@dvllp.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Canon Financial Services, Inc.
158 Gaither Drive, #200
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
(Via US Mail)
CIT Technology Financing Services I,
LLC
10201 Centurion Parkway North
Jacksonville, FL 32256
(Via US Mail)

Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust
Company
220 Alhambra Circle, Suite 500
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(Via US Mail)

Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc.
1140 West Loop North
Houston, TX 77055
(Via US Mail)

Florida Department of Revenue
501 S. Calhoun Street
Room 201
Carlton Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(Via US Mail)

County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street, Suite 210 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Via US Mail)

Miami-Dade County Tax Collectors 140 West Flagler Street, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via US Mail)

Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 (Via US Mail)

THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. ITTLEMAN, P.A. 440 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (Via US Mail)

Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via US Mail)

F. McGinn, Esq. Bartlett Feinberg, P.C. 155 Federal Street, 9th Floor Boston, w 02110 ffm@bostonbusinessla (VIA CM/ECF and E

Darol H. M. C 99 Nesbit Punta G 3950 dca (VI F and EMAIL)

Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 bee@blankrome.com (VIA EMAIL)

Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121 Boca Raton, FL 33432 rfc@colemanattomeys.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Mark S. Haltzman, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone, LLC 3600 Horizon Blvd, Suite 200 Trevose, PA 19053 mhaltzman@lammrubenstone (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL A

Robert C. Buschel, 100 S.E. Third Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL buschel@bg (VIA CM .com EMAIL)

Ber I Pollack & Brant C r is Accountants & Consultants, iscayne Boulevard, Sixth Floor MI i, FL 33131-2310 ttn: Richard Pollack (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

MELAND RUSSIN & BUDWICK, P.A. 3000 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Attn: James C. Moon, Esq. jmoon@melandrussin.com Attn: Peter D. Russin, Esq. prussin@melandrussin.com Attn: Michael S. Budwick, Esq. mbudwick@melandrussin.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Gary S. Blake, Esq. 1499 W. Palmetto Park Rd, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33486 gblake®Iglaw.net (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Melinda S. Thornton, Esq. Assistant County Attorney County Attorney's Office 2810 Stephen P. Clark Center I l 1 N.W. First Street Miami, Fl 33128-1993 Email: cao.bkc®miamidade.gov (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

SLATKIN & P.A. Attorneys for Adler and Katie Adler One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 609 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 jslatkin®slatkinreynolds.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

ASSOULINE & BERLOWE, P.A. 213 East Sheridan Street, Ste. 3 Dania Beach, FL 33004 Ann: Eric N. Assouline, Esq. ena®assoulineberlowe.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. Reisman, Esq. CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178-0061 E-mail: sreisman®curtis.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Turner P. =, Esq. CURTIS, MALL -PRE ST, COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 Park A New Yo 178-0061 E-ma'1: is urtis.com (Via a d U.S. Mail)

Heather L. Ries, Esq. Fox Rothschild, LLP 222 Lakeview Ave, Suite 700 West Palm Beach, Fl 33401 hries®foxrothschild.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Maryann Gallagher, Esq. CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178-0061 E-mail: mgallagher®curtis.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

ILEANA CRUZ BONGINI, ESQ. icruz®steamsweaver.com STEARNS WEAVER MILLE WEISSLER ALHADEFF & Coquina Investments Museum Tower, Suite 150 West Flagler S Miami, Florida 3313 (VIA CM/E EMAIL) RSON, P.A.

n lgoll' es.com LLP ea ns Tower, 15th Floor 'ckell Avenue ri: , FL 33131 IA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Paul J. McMahon, Esq. Paul McMahon, P.A. 2840 S.W. Third Ave Miami, Florida 33129 pjm®pjmlawmiami.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert P. Avolio, Esq. Crossroads Corporate Center 3150 Brunswick Pike, Ste. 120 Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 ravolio@avoliohanlon.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Mark S. Shipman, Esq. 20 Batterson Park Road, Suite 120 Farmington, CT 06032 mark®shipso.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida one tober 15, 2010.

2

Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.nsb.uscounsigov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.

Debtor.

ENO.: 09-34791-RBR

\HARTER 11

AMENDEI),ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN

THIS CAUSE ca fore the Court for hearing on October 13, 2010 upon the Motion to Clarify Order inting Special (D.E. #1013) which pertains to this Court's Order Respecti tion of Documents Regarding Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. #888) ("Order 888"). The C u rgument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises,

DOES HEREBY ORDER:

  • I. Order 888 is amended solely as follows:

a. Within two business days following receipt of this order, Berger Singerman, as counsel for the Trustee, Herbert Stettin ("Trustee"), shall deliver to Gary at the , Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. law firm (" Jaffe), a copy of the CD produced pursuant to Order 888 to Judge Robert Carney as Special and which contains all electronically stored information ("ESI") and other documents in th rustee's possession, respecting the subject matter of the subpoena previously served upon the\irrustee related to L.M., Scott Rothstein, Brad and Jeffrey Epstein.

b. Jaffe shall review all documents contai ed on CD and prepare a detailed privilege log within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Jaffe shall serve the privilege log on all parties in interest to these proceeding n tl me with the Court.

c. Contemporaneous with the \*c ding of the privilege log, Jaffe shall provide to a reputable copy sest,,o, redacted copy of the Trustee's CD of documents, and that copy service shall lira nd bate stamp all documents on the CD, and return all materials to Jaff w o mall forthwith notify Trustee's counsel and the Special of the bate stamp rang duplicated documents s I those documents sub 'scion to the Special and the Trustee's counsel. Jaffe shall furni ies f the segregated documents to which it asserts a privilege both to the Special ki d the Trustee at Jaffe's cost. ents. Jaffe shall then extract from the hard copy those documents which it listed on the privilege log, and segregate

d. To the extent that documents on the CD are duplicated and not subject to an assertion of privilege, they shall be forthwith provided to counsel for Epstein, counsel to the Razorback creditors, as well as to any other party who requests such documents, all at their own respective cost.

e. Following service and filing of the privilege log, the Special shall schedule a hearing to occur at the offices of Berger Singerman where all parties in interest will have the opportunity to provide written submissions respecting the privilege log and to make argument on all issues relevant to the applicability of privilege as to the documents listed on the Jaffe privilege log. That hearing shall be transcribed by a court reporter.

f. Following completion of the aforementioned hearing, the is shall prepare a report making all appropriate findings and recommendatio urt, which shall be served on all parties in interest and filed with the Court, alon with transcript of the Special hearing.

7a., g. Any party may file a written objkction --the Special report \ ..\ \ \\\ /2 within ten days after service of same. If no party filet atiobetion t to the report, the Court shall 'a A \,.) approve the report and adopt same into a court order without further notice to the parties. If an objection to the report is filed by any party in interest, then this Court shall schedule and hold a hearing to resolve with finality the 'ssurel,privilege as consistent with the appropriate law and procedures set forth herein.

###

Submitted by: Charles H. Ltehttnan,frEsq. BERGE2N,MAN, P.A.. 350 East Mt s Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort LtiFi ale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 clichtman@bergersingerman.com

Copy furnished to: Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. (Charles H. Lichtman is directed to serve this Order to all parties of interest and to file a Certificate of Service.) 2996606-3

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscouns.gov

IN RE:

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,

Debtor.

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR

CHAPTER I I

O A MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED ORDER ID.E. 10681 AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO HIS REQUEST

Movants, LM and J. move this Cou lief Prom Amended Order [D.E. 1068] related to the production of documents requ rey Epstein and to Compel At Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of all u. gl4r which he has requested, and in support thereof, states as follows:

  • 1. Brad , an attom ( Seplo \ d by Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. a Jaffe '), has represented LM and other women who allege that they were sexually expl ually abused, and otherwise victims of intentional and despicable conduct of .1 2y Epstein. Epstein's conduct has been the subject of several lawsuits vigorously a d litig (fic by i . , as well as similar lawsuits filed by other well-known attorneys ( 4... fi son behalf of other victims. pstein filed a frivolous lawsuit against Attorney and his client LM, who is one o Epstein's former victims, and through this lawsuit has sought voluminous discovery from the Trustee, including many documents which are patently subject to claims of privilege and/or attorney work product and/or privacy. Epstein's requests were so overbroad that they include the entire legitimate case files and investigative files of Attorney
    • 3. The Court previously entered Amended Order [D.E. 1068] which crafted a

procedure by which the undersigned counsel would have a reasonable opportunity to review those documents in the Trustee's possession which are responsive to Epstein's request. Accordingly, the Amended Order directed the Trustee to provide the undersigned counsel with documents and ESI in response to a state court subpoena duces tecum served by Jeffrey Epstein. This Amended Order directs the undersigned counsel to prepare and file a privileg 4 log 1 and imposes the expense associated with printing all documents produced by Tru ee on undersigned counsel.

4. Prior to receiving the CD from Trustee's counsel tht under gned, as well as I perhaps all parties involved, was under the impression ithatal'e production consisted of \ Ill approximately 6,000 pages of documents. st

5. In fact, it was during, or just after afing on Special Motion to Clarify Order Appointing Special v'st 's counsel realized that the Trustee may be in possession of additional ESI store a Fo s file system.

6. Consequently, the ee bas now produced to the undersigned counsel two compact discs ("CDs") which contain approximately 74,000 pages of documents.

' ...2 7. Addition one of the files produced by Trustee was a corrupt and unworkable file; on October 2010 ovants requested that this corrupted file be resent to their office. In addition, ested that the files be stamped electronically so that a better record forte og can be created. To date Movants still have not received the new disc(s).

Once Movants receive all files in a workable format, reviewing 74,000 pages of documents and creating a privilege log will take considerable more attorney time than was anticipated. Consequently, Movants are requesting an additional 30 days to complete this process.

9. In accordance with this Court's order, undersigned counsel have obtained an estimate of the printing and . stamping costs associated with printing this 74,000 page collection of documents requested by Epstein. The cost of printing these documents exceeds \$7,000 (\$0.10 per page x 74,000 pages).

10. Epstein, through counsel, has previously represented to the Trustee at he is willing to bear the reasonable expense associated with this production, and in the iginal Order that contemplated Special Carney preparing the Privilege 8) directly stated, "All legal fees and costs incurred by the Special shall idi pstein, who has already agreed to pay directly all such fees and costs."

II. With approximately 74,000 pages to pd tamp, review, and create a privilege log that can only be done by the attorn sic tt died or are handling the Epsteinrelated casts, it will take many full daysc \ f.0 engaging in this exercise should be co sate r their time. omeys to complete, and the attorneys

12. It is entirely reasot li t Epstein, the party seeking this discovery, bear the printing expense and other rNistL5abl costs and attorney's fees associated with his discovery request.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, LM and Attorney request that the Court grant-IMIkimation for relief from amended order [DE 1068] and enter an order which Ax compels NM to prepay the cost of printing all documents responsive to his request as well as reasonable attorney's fees for this time-consuming task and enlarging the time for the undersigned counsel to file a privilege log by thirty days from the date that Epstein pays the printing costs, and granting any other relief the Court deems appropriate.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to L.R. 9073-1(D), Movant's counsel has

contacted Epstein's counsel in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter without a hearing and I further certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on electronically to the examinee, the debtor, the attorney for the debtor, the trustee, all CM/ECF subscribers, and by email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the attached service list this 2nd day of November, 2010.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United S istn Court Z A t. for the Southern District of Florida and am in compliance with the add u ifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

C \_ M IAFFE(WEISSING, ySTOS &' LEHRMAN, P.L. .1

By: /sk\$eth laman Seth I fiknan FLBN 132896 armer FLBN 914444 Brad1O ards FLBN 542075 (125 NO Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 s49Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 54)524-2820 (954)524-2822 Fax seth@pathtojustice.com

JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 686-6300 (561) 684-5816 (fax)

SERVICE LIST
CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR

Marianella Morales, Esquire
Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors
Avenida Francisco de Miranda
Torre Provincial "A"
Piso 8
Caracas, Venezuela
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

John H. Genovese, Esq.
Robert F. Elgidely, Esq.
Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA
Bank Of America Tower at International
Place
100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 4400
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Kendall Coffey, Esq.
Coffey Burlington,
Office in the Grove
Penthouse
2699 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

The Honorable Herbert M. Stettin
One Biscayne Tower
Suite 3700
Two South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131
(VIA U.S. MAIL and EMAIL)

John G. Bianco, Esq.
John M. Mulli, Esquire
Tripp Scott
110 Southeast Sixth Street
Fifteenth Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301
jgb@trippscott.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Alison W. Lehr, Esq.
Grisel Alonso, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33132
Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov
Grisel.alonso@usdoj.gov
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq.
Sonn & Erez, PLC
Broward Financial Center
500 E. Broward Boulevard
Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
jsonn@sonnerez.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Office of the US Trustee
51 Southwest First Avenue
Suite 1204
Miami, Florida 33130
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

[REDACTED] Tew, Esq.
Tew-[REDACTED], LLP
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131-3407
tt@tewlaw.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Conrad & Scherer, LLP
633 South Federal Highway
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
bs@conradscherer.com
JSilver@conradscherer.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael D. Sees; Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP 1 E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 mseese®hinshawlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail)

Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 (Via U.S. Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW 1st Avenue, #11I4 Miami, Fl 33130 (Via U.S. Mail)

United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail)

Special Asst. U.S. Atto IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Isi Rd., ate 340 Plantation, FL 3 -3906 (Via U.S.

Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting U.S. Attorney 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Fl 33132 (Via U.S. Mail)

Daniel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, Inc 14051 NW I 4th Street Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mail)

William Sali Moskowitz Mandel 800 Corporate Dr St Fort Lauder wsalim® (VIA / orida 33334 m d EMAIL)

afiSony Gruppo eSw est Cypress Creek Road rfe 500 \* on Lauderdale, FL 33309 Anthony.gruppo®usi.biz (VIA EMAIL)

The Hon \* c H. Holder, Jr. Atto eral of the U.S. 950 Pen ylvania Avenue, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 (Via U.S. Mail)

Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 marc®nuriklaw.com (VIA EMAIL)

BAST AMRON LLP SunTrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 1440 Miami, Florida 33131 bamron®bastamron.com jbast®bastamron.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Mark Bloom, Esq.
John B. Hutton, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1221 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
bloomm@gtlaw.com
huttonj@gtlaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert D. Critton, Esq.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
rcrit@bclclaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Roth & Scholl
Attn: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq.
Attorneys For Creditor Blue
Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P.
866 South Dixie Highway
Coral Gables, FL 33146
jeff@rothandscholl.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP
1401 East Broward Blvd
Suite 300
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
mfbooth@rmzlaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Arthur C. Neiwirth, Esq.
One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1400
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
aneiwirth@qpwblaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

The Florida Bar
Adria E. Quintela, Esq.
Alan Anthony Pascal, Esq.
Lake Shore Plaza II
1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130
Sunrise, FL 33323
aquintel@flabar.org
apascal@flabar.org

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Micheal W. Moskowitz, Esq.
800 Corporate Drive, Suite 500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33234
mmoskowitz@mmsslaw.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Francis L. Carter, Esq.
Katz Barron Squitero Faust
2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33133
flc@katzbarron.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Bradley S. Shraiberg, Esq.
2385 NW Executive Drive
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Henry S. Wulf, Esq.
CARLTON [REDACTED], P.A.
525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
E-Mail: hwulf@carltonfields.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

EMESS Capital, LLC
c/o Bruce A. Katzen, Esq.
201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
E-Mail: bkatzen@klugerkaplan.com
jberman@klugerkaplan.com

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Ira Sochet, Trustee
Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet
c/o Phil Hudson, Esq.
200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: pmhudson@arnstein.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. [REDACTED], Esq.
Gray [REDACTED], P.A.
1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 1600
Miami, Florida 33131
E-Mail - [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Coquina Investments
c/o Patricia A. Redmond, Esq.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33130
E-Mail: predmond@stearnsweaver.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Peter F. Valori, Esq.
DAMIAN & VALORI LLP
1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1020
Miami, FL 33131
E-mail: pvalori@dvllp.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.
Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600
350 East Las Olas Blvd
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: Michael.goldberg@akerman.com
Eyal.berger@akerman.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Canon Financial Services, Inc.
158 Gaither Drive, #200
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
(Via US Mail)

LMB Funding Group
c/o Robert C. Furr, Esq.
2255 Glades Road, Suite 337W
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
E-Mail: rfurr@furrcohen.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

CIT Technology Financing Services I,
LLC
10201 Centurion Parkway North
Jacksonville, FL 32256
(Via US Mail)

[REDACTED] A. Gordich, Esq.
Melissa Alagna, Esq.
SEGALL/GORDICH P.A.
801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900
Miami, Florida 33131
Email: lag@segallgordich.com
Email: mma@segallgordich.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust
Company
220 Alhambra Circle, Suite 500
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(Via US Mail)

Broward County - Attn: Hollie N. Hawn, Esq.
Government Center
115 South Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
E-Mail: hhawn@broward.org
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc.
1140 West Loop North
Houston, TX 77055
(Via US Mail)

Florida Department of Revenue
501 S. Calhoun Street
Room 201
Carlton Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(Via US Mail)

County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street, Suite 210 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Via US Mail)

Miami-Dade County Tax Collectors 140 West Flagler Street, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via US Mail)

Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 (Via US Mail)

THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. ITTLEMAN, P.A. 440 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (Via US Mail)

Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via US Mail)

F. McGinn, Esq. Bartlett Feinberg, P.0 155 Federal Street, 9th Floor Boston, C 02110 ffm@bostonbusinessla (VIA CM/ECF and E

Darol H. M. C 99 Nesbit Punta dcarr fa (VIA 3950 F and EMAIL)

Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 bee@blankrome.com (VIA EMAIL)

Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121 Boca Raton, FL 33432 rfc@colemanattomeys.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Mark S. Haltzman, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone, LLC mhaltzman@lammrubenstone (VIA CM/ECF and EMA 3600 Horizon Blvd, Suite 200 Trevose, PA 19053

Robert C. Buschel, E 100 S.E. Third Ave Fort Lauderdale, FL busehel@b (VIA C .com EMAIL)

Be Pollack & Brant lic Accountants & Consultants, iscayne Boulevard, Sixth Floor ini, FL 33131-2310 ttn: Richard Pollack (Via Email and U.S. Mail)

MELAND RUSSIN & BUDWICK, P.A. 3000 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Attn: James C. Moon, Esq. jmoon@melandrussin.com Attn: Peter D. Russin, Esq. prussin@melandrussin.com Attn: Michael S. Budwick, Esq. mbudwick@melandrussin.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Gary S. Blake, Esq. 1499 W. Palmetto Park Rd, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33486 gblake@Iglaw.net (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Melinda S. Thornton, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney
County Attorney's Office
2810 Stephen P. Clark Center
111 N.W. First Street
Miami, FL 33128-1993
Email: cao.bkc@miamidade.gov
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

SLATKIN & [REDACTED], P.A.
Attorneys for [REDACTED] Adler and Katie Adler
One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 609
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
jslatkin@slatkinreynolds.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

ASSOULINE & BERLOWE, P.A.
213 East Sheridan Street, Ste. 3
Dania Beach, FL 33004
Attn: Eric N. Assouline, Esq.
ena@assoulineberlowe.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Steven J. Reisman, Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST,
COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: sreisman@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Turner P. [REDACTED], Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT &
MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: tsmith@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Heather L. Ries, Esq.
Fox Rothschild, LLP
222 Lakeview Ave, Suite 700
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
hries@foxrothschild.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Maryann Gallagher, Esq.
CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST,
COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0061
E-mail: mgallagher@curtis.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

ILEANA CRUZ BONGINI, ESQ.
icruz@stearnsweaver.com
STEARNS WEAVER MILLER
WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A.
Coquina Investments
Museum Tower, Suite 2200
150 West Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33130
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

[REDACTED] Maynard Gollin
lgollin@gordonrees.com
[REDACTED] & Rees LLP
Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, FL 33131
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Paul J. McMahon, Esq.
Paul [REDACTED] McMahon, P.A.
2840 S.W. Third Ave
Miami, Florida 33129
pjm@pjmlawmiami.com
(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

Robert P. Avolio, Esq.
Crossroads Corporate Center
3150 Brunswick Pike, Ste. 120
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
ravolio@avoliohanlon.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

Mark S. Shipman, Esq.
20 Batterson Park Road, Suite 120
Farmington, CT 06032
mark@shipso.com
(Via Email and U.S. Mail)

NOTA CERTIFIED COPY

+ + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5acd2dfd9ff5f6d09a556e066ddd1e63296d005d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/EFTA02769019.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,5024 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 95, + "chars": 163612, + "elapsed_seconds": 70.22, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_31_Picture_149.jpeg", + "_page_31_Picture_167.jpeg", + "_page_54_Picture_92.jpeg", + "_page_81_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.362, + 69.832 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 69.832 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 113.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 319.362, + 113.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR A STAY OF SUBPOENA PENDI \nMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FO \nSCHEDULING ORDER ON C \nG ON PREVIOUSLY-FILED \nCTIVE ORDER, AND FOR \nN A PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.26599999999999, + 332.10799999999995 + ], + [ + 540.552, + 332.10799999999995 + ], + [ + 540.552, + 377.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 67.26599999999999, + 377.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND FACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.734, + 319.509 + ], + [ + 380.9538269042969, + 319.509 + ], + [ + 380.9538269042969, + 335.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 235.734, + 335.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DISCUSSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.428, + 125.202 + ], + [ + 344.7330322265625, + 125.202 + ], + [ + 344.7330322265625, + 140.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 265.428, + 140.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIS COURT, RATHER THAN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, IS THE PROPER \nFORUM FOR LITIGATING THE SCOPE OF SUBPOENAS SERVED IN THIS CASE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 74.538, + 152.031 + ], + [ + 534.9556274414062, + 152.031 + ], + [ + 534.9556274414062, + 182.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 74.538, + 182.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIS COURT SHOULD ENTER A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ESTABLISH A \nSCHEDULE FOR RESOLVING THE PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION \nAND THEN ANY SURVIVING PRIVILEGE ISSUES.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.356, + 124.23599999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 124.23599999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 168.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 76.356, + 168.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.368, + 208.427 + ], + [ + 344.81399999999996, + 208.427 + ], + [ + 344.81399999999996, + 221.403 + ], + [ + 259.368, + 221.403 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.51999999999998, + 70.64399999999999 + ], + [ + 347.84399999999994, + 70.64399999999999 + ], + [ + 347.84399999999994, + 84.448 + ], + [ + 254.51999999999998, + 84.448 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE PIMTO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.196, + 290.36138916015625 + ], + [ + 444.7284240722656, + 290.36138916015625 + ], + [ + 444.7284240722656, + 348.2035217285156 + ], + [ + 161.196, + 348.2035217285156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.43400000000003, + 446.33700000000005 + ], + [ + 399.85980224609375, + 446.33700000000005 + ], + [ + 399.85980224609375, + 461.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 205.43400000000003, + 461.30352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION.'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 407.313 + ], + [ + 389.7986145019531, + 407.313 + ], + [ + 389.7986145019531, + 423.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 423.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.85399999999998, + 183.512 + ], + [ + 365.41799999999995, + 183.512 + ], + [ + 365.41799999999995, + 196.504 + ], + [ + 247.85399999999998, + 196.504 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 112.86800000000001 + ], + [ + 518.470703125, + 112.86800000000001 + ], + [ + 518.470703125, + 153.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 153.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT J. EDWARDS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST \nFOR PRODUCTION DATED APRIL 12, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 388.13599999999997 + ], + [ + 510.9110107421875, + 388.13599999999997 + ], + [ + 510.9110107421875, + 416.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 88.01499999999999, + 416.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.61399999999998, + 151.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 376.3204345703125, + 151.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 376.3204345703125, + 165.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 223.61399999999998, + 165.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 270.882, + 152.031 + ], + [ + 358.14599999999996, + 152.031 + ], + [ + 358.14599999999996, + 165.852 + ], + [ + 270.882, + 165.852 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFort Lauderdale Division \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.70800000000003, + 91.05600000000001 + ], + [ + 416.0838928222656, + 91.05600000000001 + ], + [ + 416.0838928222656, + 146.853515625 + ], + [ + 192.70800000000003, + 146.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL \nPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM TRUSTEE PURSUANT TO \nDOCUMENT PRODUCTION P' OTOCOL ESTABLISHED BY DE #672", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.776, + 273.981 + ], + [ + 486.1469421386719, + 273.981 + ], + [ + 486.1469421386719, + 316.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 118.776, + 316.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OFIERVICR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.614, + 127.64100000000002 + ], + [ + 379.93865966796875, + 127.64100000000002 + ], + [ + 379.93865966796875, + 143.103515625 + ], + [ + 223.614, + 143.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.384, + 228.70199999999997 + ], + [ + 247.24799999999996, + 228.70199999999997 + ], + [ + 247.24799999999996, + 240.05599999999998 + ], + [ + 99.384, + 240.05599999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.1300354003906, + 124.23599999999999 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 124.23599999999999 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 138.3250732421875 + ], + [ + 263.1300354003906, + 138.3250732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.284, + 87.69599999999998 + ], + [ + 412.1584167480469, + 87.69599999999998 + ], + [ + 412.1584167480469, + 141.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 190.284, + 141.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE PRODUCTION FROM \nTRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.082, + 244.412 + ], + [ + 511.8165588378906, + 244.412 + ], + [ + 511.8165588378906, + 285.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 89.082, + 285.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 77.568, + 427.92400000000004 + ], + [ + 179.25404357910156, + 427.92400000000004 + ], + [ + 179.25404357910156, + 442.8305969238281 + ], + [ + 77.568, + 442.8305969238281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.962, + 113.68 + ], + [ + 176.75631713867188, + 113.68 + ], + [ + 176.75631713867188, + 127.947021484375 + ], + [ + 76.962, + 127.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ill. Memorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.75, + 403.248 + ], + [ + 223.47625732421875, + 403.248 + ], + [ + 223.47625732421875, + 418.0670471191406 + ], + [ + 75.75, + 418.0670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are \nNot Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.04799999999999, + 429.264 + ], + [ + 462.3300476074219, + 429.264 + ], + [ + 462.3300476074219, + 457.4470520019531 + ], + [ + 126.04799999999999, + 457.4470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorney Work Product and Beyond \nthe Permissible Scope of Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.10999999999999, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 524.3348999023438, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 524.3348999023438, + 116.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 112.10999999999999, + 116.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i. Scope of Permissible Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.046, + 179.231 + ], + [ + 338.3085021972656, + 179.231 + ], + [ + 338.3085021972656, + 193.68701171875 + ], + [ + 146.046, + 193.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Protective Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.046, + 270.874 + ], + [ + 272.15643310546875, + 270.874 + ], + [ + 272.15643310546875, + 285.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 146.046, + 285.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.34199999999998, + 89.43 + ], + [ + 379.962, + 89.43 + ], + [ + 379.962, + 114.63299999999998 + ], + [ + 216.34199999999998, + 114.63299999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.39000000000001, + 89.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 415.5693359375, + 89.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 415.5693359375, + 142.570556640625 + ], + [ + 192.39000000000001, + 142.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE \nPRODUCTION FROM TRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND \nTESTIMONY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 91.355, + 245.828 + ], + [ + 516.115478515625, + 245.828 + ], + [ + 516.115478515625, + 286.5705871582031 + ], + [ + 91.355, + 286.5705871582031 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.465, + 428.978 + ], + [ + 181.90341186523438, + 428.978 + ], + [ + 181.90341186523438, + 443.33056640625 + ], + [ + 80.465, + 443.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 45, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.81, + 115.588 + ], + [ + 181.62631225585938, + 115.588 + ], + [ + 181.62631225585938, + 129.947021484375 + ], + [ + 81.81, + 129.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "111. Memorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.992, + 429.26400000000007 + ], + [ + 229.0962677001953, + 429.26400000000007 + ], + [ + 229.0962677001953, + 443.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 79.992, + 443.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Discovery Issnes Belated to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are \nNot Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.89600000000002, + 456.09300000000013 + ], + [ + 468.4082336425781, + 456.09300000000013 + ], + [ + 468.4082336425781, + 483.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 130.89600000000002, + 483.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorney Work Product and Beyond \nthe Permissible Scope of Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.322, + 115.44599999999998 + ], + [ + 525.8348999023438, + 115.44599999999998 + ], + [ + 525.8348999023438, + 142.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 113.322, + 142.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i. Scope of Permissible Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 206.502 + ], + [ + 340.1803283691406, + 206.502 + ], + [ + 340.1803283691406, + 220.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 220.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. Protective Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 297.558 + ], + [ + 273.65911865234375, + 297.558 + ], + [ + 273.65911865234375, + 312.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 312.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.58399999999997, + 89.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.598, + 89.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.598, + 114.77399999999999 + ], + [ + 220.58399999999997, + 114.77399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.89000000000001, + 296.826 + ], + [ + 411.47400000000005, + 296.826 + ], + [ + 411.47400000000005, + 336.56499999999994 + ], + [ + 190.89000000000001, + 336.56499999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 54, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.316, + 454.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 429.048, + 454.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 429.048, + 480.923 + ], + [ + 173.316, + 480.923 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DOES HEREBY ORDER:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 55, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.50899999999999, + 89.32 + ], + [ + 240.50442504882812, + 89.32 + ], + [ + 240.50442504882812, + 103.947021484375 + ], + [ + 113.50899999999999, + 103.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Submitted by:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.78, + 86.884 + ], + [ + 148.27655029296875, + 86.884 + ], + [ + 148.27655029296875, + 102.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 78.78, + 102.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 56, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.78, + 218.42799999999997 + ], + [ + 167.86200000000002, + 218.42799999999997 + ], + [ + 167.86200000000002, + 232.23199999999997 + ], + [ + 78.78, + 232.23199999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.fisb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 87.69599999999998 + ], + [ + 414.2138977050781, + 87.69599999999998 + ], + [ + 414.2138977050781, + 142.18701171875 + ], + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 142.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 57, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.47199999999998, + 245.224 + ], + [ + 476.31600000000003, + 245.224 + ], + [ + 476.31600000000003, + 259.853515625 + ], + [ + 128.47199999999998, + 259.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 59, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.40000000000003, + 191.63199999999998 + ], + [ + 398.1050720214844, + 191.63199999999998 + ], + [ + 398.1050720214844, + 208.103515625 + ], + [ + 242.40000000000003, + 208.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 60, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 52.714999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 52.714999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 82.722 + ], + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 82.722 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 61, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 53.592 + ], + [ + 382.03240966796875, + 53.592 + ], + [ + 382.03240966796875, + 84.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 84.0670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE \nSERVICE LIST \nNO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 62, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 54.337 + ], + [ + 382.4164733886719, + 54.337 + ], + [ + 382.4164733886719, + 83.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 83.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 63, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 52.714999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 52.714999999999996 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 81.911 + ], + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 81.911 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A \nSERVICE LIST \nE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 64, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.25, + 54.471000000000004 + ], + [ + 384.65240478515625, + 54.471000000000004 + ], + [ + 384.65240478515625, + 84.68701171875 + ], + [ + 227.25, + 84.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 65, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.983, + 55.284000000000006 + ], + [ + 382.40999999999997, + 55.284000000000006 + ], + [ + 382.40999999999997, + 83.739 + ], + [ + 223.983, + 83.739 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 66, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 52.779999999999994 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 52.779999999999994 + ], + [ + 380.568, + 82.82399999999998 + ], + [ + 223.00799999999998, + 82.82399999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww. flsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 86.991 + ], + [ + 414.2425842285156, + 86.991 + ], + [ + 414.2425842285156, + 140.947021484375 + ], + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 140.947021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THE PRODUCTION FROM \nTRUSTEE STETTIN OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY TO \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.89999999999999, + 243.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 512.71337890625, + 243.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 512.71337890625, + 285.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 90.89999999999999, + 285.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Introduction", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.386, + 480.483 + ], + [ + 180.17820739746094, + 480.483 + ], + [ + 180.17820739746094, + 495.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 79.386, + 495.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 67, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.70000000000005, + 740.643 + ], + [ + 342.640380859375, + 740.643 + ], + [ + 342.640380859375, + 756.3170394897461 + ], + [ + 272.70000000000005, + 756.3170394897461 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 68, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.992, + 140.649 + ], + [ + 179.37631225585938, + 140.649 + ], + [ + 179.37631225585938, + 155.18701171875 + ], + [ + 79.992, + 155.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. Memorandum of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.992, + 612.189 + ], + [ + 228.401123046875, + 612.189 + ], + [ + 228.401123046875, + 626.5670471191406 + ], + [ + 79.992, + 626.5670471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Are \nNot Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 70, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.29, + 638.205 + ], + [ + 467.27825927734375, + 638.205 + ], + [ + 467.27825927734375, + 666.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 130.29, + 666.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Discovery Sought is Privileged and/or Attorse Vork Product and Beyond \nthe Permissible Scope of Discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.322, + 297.558 + ], + [ + 525.4019999999999, + 297.558 + ], + [ + 525.4019999999999, + 325.55352783203125 + ], + [ + 113.322, + 325.55352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "i. Scope of Permissib coy", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 389.42699999999996 + ], + [ + 338.148, + 389.42699999999996 + ], + [ + 338.148, + 404.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 404.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ii. P e Orders", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 71, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 494.304 + ], + [ + 272.6653137207031, + 494.304 + ], + [ + 272.6653137207031, + 509.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 147.25799999999998, + 509.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 75, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 88.617 + ], + [ + 381.174, + 88.617 + ], + [ + 381.174, + 114.63299999999998 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 114.63299999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.89000000000001, + 295.93199999999996 + ], + [ + 413.49603271484375, + 295.93199999999996 + ], + [ + 413.49603271484375, + 337.60406494140625 + ], + [ + 190.89000000000001, + 337.60406494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDEI),ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF \nDOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 81, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.80200000000002, + 454.467 + ], + [ + 444.2666015625, + 454.467 + ], + [ + 444.2666015625, + 481.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 161.80200000000002, + 481.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.flsb.uscouns.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.70799999999997, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 415.1893310546875, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 415.1893310546875, + 141.070556640625 + ], + [ + 192.70799999999997, + 141.070556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "O A\nMOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AMENDED ORDER ID.E. 10681 \nAND TO COMPEL JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE \nPRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO HIS REQUEST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 84, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.32199999999999, + 235.91168212890625 + ], + [ + 493.06951904296875, + 235.91168212890625 + ], + [ + 493.06951904296875, + 285.4505920410156 + ], + [ + 113.32199999999999, + 285.4505920410156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 88, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.79599999999996, + 88.617 + ], + [ + 384.204, + 88.617 + ], + [ + 384.204, + 114.63299999999998 + ], + [ + 221.79599999999996, + 114.63299999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 79 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 163 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 89 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 55, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 56, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 57, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 58, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 59, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 60, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 61, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 62, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 173 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 63, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 64, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 65, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 66, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 67, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 68, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 69, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 70, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 71, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 72, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 73, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 74, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 75, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 76, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 167 + ], + [ + "Line", + 77 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 77, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 78, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 79, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 166 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 80, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 169 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 81, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 82, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 83, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 84, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 85, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 86, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 87, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 88, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 89, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 161 + ], + [ + "Line", + 78 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 90, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 91, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 92, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 93, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 94, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769019" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_149.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_149.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5fd082dcaf6f8313ebf1ac38b143f488dfc5e90b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_149.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:669811cee462c3683ccc10c1b809bc62e8eac40a56e10809c161ac8cbe5576da +size 5136 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_167.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_167.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..000e1ce6038ebddc6b006d3b2f6ea809e241f549 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_31_Picture_167.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e689442c8bd173b09c7d3171643b09e47f53890d0bb726cf04b587ce9a0fde71 +size 6965 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_54_Picture_92.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_54_Picture_92.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06dbcd2baae68d48c988569c4e059d08133b01c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_54_Picture_92.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e8a69de19cebd908cdb7f9b993d145f9740eb38ae04753fce8e1d3866487751e +size 13467 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_81_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_81_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..072d5d22a3709ebfe08165cd866b27a1bbab883a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769019/_page_81_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fc40bc8bed6e0b89d3b7c0da73ecfc489cce6b228370a9b3f547b935ad2b1946 +size 14057 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a5acda1f7b4b867f42ee15603522ed907534828 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR +ADMISSIONS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010** + +Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, +and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370 files his Response to those Request for +Admissions of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] for which no objection has been +asserted and would state as follows: + +**EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] RFA** + +- 10. Denied. +- 11. Denied. +- 12. Denied. +- 20. Denied. +- 21. Denied. +- 23. Denied. + +2010 DEC - 1 AM 11:49 +FLORIDA CIRCUIT COURT +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +- 24. Denied. +- 26. Denied. +- 27. Denied. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this 29th day of November, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..193ce6cfda11fc5a3ceade1185739f265e1206a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114/EFTA02769114.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769114.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1747, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.06, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.726, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 140.13 + ], + [ + 315.726, + 140.13 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. [REDACTED] REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.75, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 75.75, + 387.98999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] RFA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.74, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 422.98799999999994, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 422.98799999999994, + 526.5 + ], + [ + 175.74, + 526.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.23999999999998, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 381.843, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 381.843, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 219.23999999999998, + 187.92000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769114" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0bb4f91abe747b96457bb2bc07215f71cd908f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +10 DEC - 6 PH 2: 58 +FLORIDA +CIRCUIT COUNTY, FLORIDA +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO FIRST SET +OF EXPERT WITNESS INTERROGATORIES AND +REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS** + +COMES NOW the Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Notice with the Court that Answers to the First Set of Expert Interrogatories propounded by the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, on November 4, 2010, have been furnished to the attorney for the Plaintiff. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail this 2nd day of December, 2010 to all counsel on the attached list. + +*Fax knD* + +*Jack Scarola* + +JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for ██████ J. ██████ + +NOTACE + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Answers to Expert Interrogatories + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12145aa92401e5094d1501260fb9581fb8d37cc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116/EFTA02769116.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769116.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2077, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.714, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 304.714, + 87.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO FIRST SET OF EXPERT WITNESS INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 441.289, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 441.289, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 347.49 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.967, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.926, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 373.926, + 146.60999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.967, + 146.60999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769116" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..768f691978e4eff15a3d498a6babddf363c52042 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +" ryl Cs) rInC: r'l 03 + +## NOTICE OF SPECIAL SEA G (15 min.) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED till ersigned has called up for healing the following: + +DATE: Thursday, January ACcirerf TIME: 11:15 a.m. (15 'n.) JUDGE: Honorable 'd F. (Palm Beach County Courthouse) PLACE: 20 . Di xi ighway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ROOM #: ®~ + +## SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD: + +MOTION FtOR A STAY OF SUBPOENA PENDING RULING ON PREVIOUSLY-FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND FOR SCHEDULING ORDER ON CREATING A PRIVILEGE LOG + +- 1. The judicial assistant cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the judicial assistant. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Special Set Hearing + +1. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +2. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +3. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of December, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Special Set Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] m +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e5cdb3ccf1d77a2820e59c05e8540b7432cb268 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118/EFTA02769118.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769118.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2920, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL SEA G (15 min.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.89199999999997, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 432.7809753417969, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 432.7809753417969, + 362.73748779296875 + ], + [ + 170.89199999999997, + 362.73748779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC TTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.448, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 278.7282409667969, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 278.7282409667969, + 582.8675079345703 + ], + [ + 65.448, + 582.8675079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.333, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 346.597, + 171.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 254.333, + 171.71999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769118" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b76a30601cd97351e5a3fe466875283f33003c8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +State of Florida + +County of Palm Beach + +Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Court Date: 1/10/2011 10:00 am + +Plaintiff: + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +vs. + +Defendant: + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +INDIVIDUALLY AND L.M., INDIVIDUALLY,** + +For: + +Jack Scarola + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Received by Aloha Process, Inc. on the 10th day of December, 2010 at 9:30 am to be served on **ROBERT D. CRITTON, 303 BANYAN BLVD SUITE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401.** + +I, [REDACTED] Moussally, do hereby affirm that on the 10th day of December, 2010 at 12:35 pm, I: + +**SUBSTITUTE** served by delivering a true copy of the **SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION AND A WITNESS FEE CHECK FOR \$10.00 USD.** with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: **STEPHANIE [REDACTED]** as **RECEPTIONIST**, a person employed therein and authorized to accept service for **ROBERT D. CRITTON** at the address of: **303 BANYAN BLVD SUITE 400, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401**, the within named person's usual place of **Work**, in compliance with State Statutes. + +**Description of Person Served:** Age: 25, Sex: F, Race/Skin Color: W, Height: 5 6, Weight: 125, Hair: [REDACTED], Glasses: N + +I certify that I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the judicial circuit in which the process was served. + +![]()[REDACTED] **Moussally** +Court Officer #997 + +**Aloha Process, Inc.** +**F.O. Box 223192** +**West Palm Beach, FL 33422** +**(561) 541-7953** + +Our Job Serial Number: 2010000128 + +/129 I 874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## 11'1 I CIRCUIT COURT OF DIE F EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FO PALM BEACH COUNTY, TLORIDA + +C E NO.: 502009CA040800 XXMBAG + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECU FO P ti + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Robert D. Clifton 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340! + +(2) le + +YOU ARE COMMAND pear b fore a person authorized b law to take depositions at the offices of un'Sied counsel on Monday, January 10, 2011, t 10:00 a.m. at Searcy Denney Scarol hart & Shipley, P. ., Annex Building, Suite 10 West Palm Beach, FL 3340 the taking of your deposition in this action. You are to ha e with you at the above pja ime the following: + +## DUCES ECUM: + +Any and all documents\* constituting, refl•cting, and/or relating to ev dence of damages claimed to have been su ained by Jeffrey Epstein as a consequence of any improper act or u tission on the part of + +IA PA cfr-tv-w \Oro Epstein v. M, et al Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant's Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition + +\* The term "documents" includes but is not 1 mited to all non-identical cop es of letters, notes, memoranda, e-mails, faxes, records, transcri and entries, regardless of hether they were made manually, mechanically, electronically magnetically, digitally, or y any other means, and regardless of whether they are on pape , tape, film, electronic devic electronic media, as well as application metadata and system m data, or any other media or i4g. + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt f Court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the folio ing attorney and subpoena by this attomt ypr the Court, you shall resp nd to this sub ed from this + +DATED this I day of uixter + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy Denney Scar Ba art & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beac es Boulevard West Palm B to a 33409 Phone: (56 00 Fax: (5. 451 Attom dley J. + +la + +f of the Court \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5545b916ae7ff77e70d9dcbb86d68fccb2d5c041 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121/EFTA02769121.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769121.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3622, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.58, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.80399999999997, + 29.159999999999997 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 29.159999999999997 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 45.36 + ], + [ + 225.80399999999997, + 45.36 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "11'1 I CIRCUIT COURT OF DIE \nF EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFO PALM BEACH COUNTY, TLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECU FO P \nti", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.475, + 308.4324951171875 + ], + [ + 435.435, + 308.4324951171875 + ], + [ + 435.435, + 381.4949951171875 + ], + [ + 167.475, + 381.4949951171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES ECUM:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.96, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 367.2547912597656, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 367.2547912597656, + 587.6080169677734 + ], + [ + 267.96, + 587.6080169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769121" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e785d2120e277fcdb3ece2421f30dae4e256738 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMI3AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffs), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +#### NOTICE OF PRODU t/ 1 NON-PARTY ct M + +TO: All counsel on the attached list + +YOU ARE NOTIFIED that aft days from the date of service of this Notice, if service is by delivery, or fifteen m the date of service, if service is by mail, and if no objection is received from an , the undersigned will issue or apply to the Clerk of this Court for issuance of the Pied Subpoena directed to the following individual(s) to produce the items listed a th me and place specified in the Subpoena. + +-11 + +O + +ecords Custodian Wackenhut Corporation 4200 Wackenhut Drive 100 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-4242 + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Production from Non-Party +Page 2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 14th day of December, 2010. + +![]()NOTA CERTIFIED + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Production from Non-Party Page 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +MS Jaffe, Weissing, ME, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 3 -6170 Phone: (561)-727-24.23 Fax: (561)-802-99 + +Marc S. Nu marc@n Law O arc S. Nurik One E B • ward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Laud dale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Records Custodian The Wackenhut Corporation 4200 Wackenhut Drive 100cv Palm Beach Gardens, FL i -4 ? S 41 / + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +# SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WIN14T DEPOSITION + +YOU ARE CO Ili AND 34.0" / to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm B hLkes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 on January 3, 2011 and to have u At that time and place the following: + +# Duces + +- 1. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relating to all services rendered for the benefit of, or at the direction of: + +Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5108 + +from January of 2009 to the present. + +- 2. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relating to all services rendered at: + +358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730 + +- 3. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relating to all services rendere for the benefit of, or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-i entic 1 copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, r s, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, t <, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detect] ekes into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic a II as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and roste information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, inc not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptop , As cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data end security tools and protocols. + +These ite be inspected and may be copied at that time. You will not be required to surrender e I items. You may comply with this subpoena by providing legible copies of the items e produced to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparation. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena and thereby eliminate your appearance at the time and place specified above. You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this + +subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena. **THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN.** + +If you fail to: + +1. 1) Appear as specified; or +2. 2) Furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +3. 3) Object to this subpoena, + +You may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED this \_\_\_\_\_ day of December, 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy/Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +direction, custody and control of the undersi It is further certified that originals of thc( ms>pioduced are maintained under the + +The foregoing Certificat the State and County aforesai 20 who: owledged before me, an officer duly authorized in cknowledgments, this day of + +the attached documents consisting of pages represents a true copy A possession, custody or control which are described in the Subpoena Dtts Tecum With-out Deposition served on me in the above styled action and'ch=-pjge is numbered by me for ,," identification. Production is complete and has been numbereAby the custodian of records. 4,,,,o / The undersigned, as custodian of records for The Wackenhut Corpora , 4 c Ties that within my + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XWMBAG Subpoena Duces Tecum without Depostion Page4 + +## CERTIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION + +STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH 13 + +[ ] is persona wn to me; or [ ] ha roducea as identification; and who: I ot, take an oath, + +and wh'07e—x-etnted the foregoing certification, and who acknowledged the foregoing certification to be freely and voluntarily executed for the purposes therein recited. + +> Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena Duces Tecum without Depostion Page5 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +m Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 3 401-61 Phone: (561)-727-2423 Fax: (561)-802-997 + +Marc S. Nun marc@nuri Law Officao rc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..603f5b4ae181dfe1b484fe49dc65a69037369b8c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124/EFTA02769124.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,482 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769124.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 7148, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 322.926, + 94.355 + ], + [ + 547.6409301757812, + 94.355 + ], + [ + 547.6409301757812, + 137.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 322.926, + 137.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PRODU t/ 1 NON-PARTY\nct M", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.872, + 369.07 + ], + [ + 473.154, + 369.07 + ], + [ + 473.154, + 384.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 202.872, + 384.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.776, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 368.3382873535156, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 368.3382873535156, + 166.10302734375 + ], + [ + 274.776, + 166.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WIN14T DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13000000000002, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 472.8520202636719, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 472.8520202636719, + 367.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 170.13000000000002, + 367.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Duces", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.744, + 584.226 + ], + [ + 161.142, + 584.226 + ], + [ + 161.142, + 599.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 84.744, + 599.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO \nSUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.77200000000002, + 146.475 + ], + [ + 472.09228515625, + 146.475 + ], + [ + 472.09228515625, + 175.10302734375 + ], + [ + 170.77200000000002, + 175.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 275.418, + 143.96399999999997 + ], + [ + 367.5904846191406, + 143.96399999999997 + ], + [ + 367.5904846191406, + 159.593505859375 + ], + [ + 275.418, + 159.593505859375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769124" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f72b8d8a1e4d7552c081489febf326c84a681185 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and I,.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION \_ + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi take the deposition of: or an attorney of the firm will + +Name: alt\IRothstein + +Date and Time: day, January 21, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: Location to be determined. + +311. cra Cr Ar n • nn O a ) -4 , ' r`rn 4"'" + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other/notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The ?tit examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken or the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for 3 S 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +L Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 \* + +BUR Espirito Santo Plaza, 14 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 331 Telephone: (305 Facsimile: (3 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates, It' Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3s Avenue, Suite 1200 t Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373- Facsimile Number (305) 35 floridaschedulin u \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b9c4dbeb142a8a9ea719a80a5948e3251ec8b0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132/EFTA02769132.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769132.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1738, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 544.9243774414062, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 544.9243774414062, + 135.853515625 + ], + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 135.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION \n_", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 419.6247253417969, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 419.6247253417969, + 347.9362487792969 + ], + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 347.9362487792969 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769132" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3abcf0faee5b5e8c252319ec700d45b14149422c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. EMI individually, and L.M., individually, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Defendants. + +I + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +C + +r •• rn r TT -n CO r - + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi or an attorney take the deposition of: of the firm will + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +Upon oral exajon S6efore US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary ii Public, oLanSP\other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +Ken Jenne + +esday, January 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th + +day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +FOR: + +![]()![]()cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates, Inc. +Suntrust International Center +One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1200 +Miami, Florida 33130 +Telephone Number (305) 373-8404 +Facsimile Number (305) 358-1427 +[floridascheduling@uslegalsupport.com](mailto:floridascheduling@uslegalsupport.com) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..511406b650c37c8dd6f69ece5d0046c334183274 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134/EFTA02769134.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769134.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1792, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 347.964, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 545.058, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 545.058, + 136.363037109375 + ], + [ + 347.964, + 136.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.996, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 419.2320251464844, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 419.2320251464844, + 343.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 343.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769134" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6e45d88fd60903754228d933ff19dcd4cbf669b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Gary [REDACTED] + +Date and Time: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +[REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys + +FILED. +2010 DEC 16 PM 2:43 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +for J. M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +F aIC:Jos Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +> BUR Espirito Santo PI Floor 1395 Brickell A Miami, Flori. 02 Telephone. 9200 Facsimiltt3' 9-9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associat Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3nd Avenue, Suite 12 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) Facsimile Number (305) lin e I •als \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9cef2000b3c452719e144beee3c6ebe1c8c1bac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136/EFTA02769136.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769136.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1940, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 347.964, + 81.286 + ], + [ + 544.4159999999999, + 81.286 + ], + [ + 544.4159999999999, + 134.918 + ], + [ + 347.964, + 134.918 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.996, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 417.3, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 417.3, + 342.74199999999996 + ], + [ + 216.996, + 342.74199999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769136" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..855e1ca2ca555d71f7a0a380f471c9b3992812d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF TAXING DEPOS + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersig take the deposition of: or an attorney of the firm will + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +% ursday, January 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +£h + +Burnett, P.A. Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Upon oral exami before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. e oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this le day of December, 2010 to lack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for 3. a 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +> rex L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +Respectfully submitted, + +BUR Espirito Santo P1azpcP Floor 1395 Brickell A Miami, Flori 02 Facsimitigy 9-9201 Telephone: -9200 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associat Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 12 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) Facsimile Number (305) floridasch lin le + ++6s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50d68b80d0d91390440d2d110d8685a68b966820 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138/EFTA02769138.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769138.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1722, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 545.058, + 80.448 + ], + [ + 545.058, + 135.853515625 + ], + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 135.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAXING DEPOS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 417.3, + 329.334 + ], + [ + 417.3, + 343.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 217.63800000000003, + 343.6035461425781 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769138" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d49114e920c5d8a44da1966e6bd79734c22a8b0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +3.1;) r,., (....; — \_Yr- .1> M 2 x 7 .r... co 0 r rrl 0 Defendants. O / on — C > m 0 71 ,1 —i- 2 ) c3. a% F-.' BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 141° Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3302 Telephone; (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab8c0e8b6ab484ccbb680c26ce1c207f8715754c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140/EFTA02769140.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769140.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1985, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.27, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 527.7210693359375, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 527.7210693359375, + 126.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 330.27, + 126.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION _ n a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 315.3615417480469 + ], + [ + 470.2441101074219, + 315.3615417480469 + ], + [ + 470.2441101074219, + 334.10302734375 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 334.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769140" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..217e99307f9f6583da1d616a7f1080166e99b656 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XWMUtG + +> •ra, ... °rn c) . 11 0 r•-• rn - r1= r rn + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CD individually, and L.M., individually, (In s; \_o + +7 — \ + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION( + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi g i ,NILr lSe or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Defendants. + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +Upon oral ex Sn fore US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, er notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +hursday, January 20, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this le + +day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Ha. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3302 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Faaimile; (305) 789-9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Suntrust International Center, One S.E. 3id Avenue, Suitj12 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373-8404 Facsimile Number (305) 358-1427 floridaschedrcr uslegalsupport.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7532f4c079e1cb50f05a3640b467fcc0c8400d26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142/EFTA02769142.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769142.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1859, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 526.17431640625, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 526.17431640625, + 126.228515625 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 126.228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION(", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.7393798828125, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 401.7393798828125, + 333.6085510253906 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 333.6085510253906 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769142" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ac24253484527ab46d6dc23be2620354c24df2f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +2010 DEC 16 PM 2:43 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: + +A.J. Dis + +Date and Time: + +Friday, January 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: + +Location to be determined. + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +N I C7 FOX; Igiseirt. Ackerman, Jr. Ha. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNE1 T + +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th loor + +1395 Brickell Avenue + +Miami, Florida 33 ink + +Telephone: (30 7: 7,6i + +Facsimile: ( \' 01 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates, Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373 Facsimile Number (305) 3 floridascheduling@usleg .com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa4a11cffb43d57b984d60c7b0374b162af2806b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144/EFTA02769144.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769144.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1907, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.008, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 526.008, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 396.93, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 396.93, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 333.71999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769144" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a50c8b4f0b227df8b4432b18de3c611871f27604 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +**Name:** Thane Richie + +**Date and Time:** Monday, January 31, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +**Place:** Location to be determined. + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and + +FILED: +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNE + +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th loot) 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131- Telephone: (305) 789-92 Facsimile: (30:311)89;9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates, Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3r° Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373- it 4 Facsimile Number (305) 358, floridascheduling@uslege s1 up.. . , m \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09c50c84a1cc5c8ee5bf15942702f55d5e1e43b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146/EFTA02769146.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769146.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1919, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 526.614, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 526.614, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 397.536, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 397.536, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 332.09999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769146" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c419a84c690a66cc977956baef77c5e3e676ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.I201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +Defendants. + +I + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +TI 171 rn 2 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: 6 \0eI Legamaro + +Date and Time: esday, February 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: Location to be determined. + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any othep4otary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The being takep th nation will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is e purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. , 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Browarrl Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +L Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BUR + +Espirito Santo Plaza, le 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33 Telephone: (30 Facsimile: (3 01 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates. Suntrust International Center One S.E. 3"I Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373- ? Facsimile Number (305) a35C , floridascheduling@usleg sup . " rn \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4399f1aba509ba86b471534dd99891a46468a1cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148/EFTA02769148.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769148.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1726, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 527.341064453125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 527.341064453125, + 126.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 126.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 400.1388244628906, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 400.1388244628906, + 334.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 334.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769148" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39b658d3e09ca3e5b5cb59a9a60ced71d715ad4f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +**NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +**Name:** Mike Fisten + +**Date and Time:** Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +**Place:** [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +**One Financial Plaza** +**100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor** +**Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394** + +Upon oral examination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 16th + +FILED: +2010 DEC 16 PM 2:44 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 3 + +day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Fog L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +> Espirito San 41 Floor 1395 Bricket Ave s' & Miami, Florida 33131-3302 Tele e:(305) 789-9200 F im es , i 305) 789-9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein. Bury & Suntrust International Cent One S.E. 3r° Avenue, Sui Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone Number (305) 373-8404 Facsimile Number (305) 358-1427 floridasched ne@uslegalsupport.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93b6da0a266d8bc5badf6738542f7266af092efd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150/EFTA02769150.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769150.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1992, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.64, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 527.826, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 527.826, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 397.536, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 397.536, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 332.90999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769150" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ba5f9827d95a68bb1625c01387d3f4548a2eca9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.md @@ -0,0 +1,361 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +DATE OF CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA + +10 DEC 22 AM 11:28 + +SEARCHED INDEXED +SERIALIZED FILED +JUN 22 2010 + +MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves this Honorable Court to reconsider the attached Orders sustaining Plaintiff's objections to discovery requests (also attached), and in support thereof, the Defendant would show that the recent opinion of the 4th District Court of Appeal in Alvarez v. ██████ Tire & Rubber Company (copy attached) supports the Defendant's position that the Orders of the Court improperly restrict Defendant's efforts to obtain information that is ██████ sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22ND day of December 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant ██████ + +## COUNSEL 1ST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & + +Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +IIIIL. Ackerman, Jr., Esqui Burnett, P.A. Anti Jeffrey Eps 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, F 3401-6170 Phone: (561) 727-242 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S +OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS +AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Request for Admissions and Interrogatory dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objections are sustained as to Requests No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15 and 29. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objections to Requests 22, 25 and 28 are overruled. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +### ORDER ON PLAINTIFF -DEFENDANT E OBJECT' DATED SEPTEMBER 1 + +THIS CAUSE having come before pon the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections tge91uatto Produce dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of ic n e d is otherwise fully adv'sed in the 4 premises. Based upon the foregoin Z ...we is + +CONSIDERED, O R AND ADJUDGED that the Plaint /Counter-Defendant's Objection to o. 1 and 4 are overruled. In all other r spects the Objections are sustained at pent. + +Sr DOIIE ANDS OR2DERED this ' day of Palm Beach Florida. r, 2010 est alm Beach, + +0 + +Copy furnished: + +, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West blaaeach, FL 3409 E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Point Wesi, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Bea h, FL 33401 MARC NU UIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 333 1 GARY M. , JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +DAVID F. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S +OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] INTERROGATORIES +DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is +otherwise fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter- +Defendant's Objections are sustained as to Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9. As to question no. +7, the objection is sustained on the attorney/client privilege. The Court defers in regard to +Interrogatory No. 8 pending the filing of an Amended Complaint by the Plaintiff. The +Objections are overruled as to questions No. 10, 11 and 16. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010 at West Palm Beach, +Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm +Beach, FL 33401 + +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. and L.M., Individually Individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH DICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FO11 P LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +C 'mplex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro 1.201 + +C No. 502009CA040800 3OOO A; 7BAG + +# DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, JE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIF RE UEST TO PRODUCE DATE <59 . isippipSE TO R + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeff EpStri and pursuant to Rule 1.350 Flo ' of Civi September 16, 2010 of Defendant/Coun er-Plaintiff, states as follows: by and through his undersigned counsel, Procedure, files this his Response dated radley J. Request to Produce and + +1. issues in thi te metts it'of the defendant, Br dley J. M, pertaining to any of the + +Response: Defendarit/Counter-Plaintiff, The Plaintiff/Counter-D fendant has not taken a statement of the J. with regard to the allegations of this complaint. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant object- to the scope of this Request because it may encompass all of the transcripts from the various 'roceedings and the various ot Ier cases in + +which Mr. spoke as counsel. As such, the R uest is overbroad, burdensome, Licl seeks irrelevant information. + +- 2. All statements of any witness you inter to use at trial for impeachment. + +Response: Any statements that the this time are protected under the work product privi not know until depositions are taken, what statem impeachment. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ha gc. The Plaintiff/Counternts may be availabl en at will trial for + +- 3. All documents including but not limi materials or any other written or electronically store communication to or from minor females and/or an to occur between you and any person who contact or planned physical contact incl interaction of any kind (this shoul I me females) ed to di s, comput d ~hy altontact which did or was planned lfjor female at the time of the physical t limited to any massage, fondlin, or sexual e pads or appointment schedulerfor minor database reflect or relate to any + +Responso jections: harassment, and ectedVthe Fifth Amendment. irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the Jpurpose of + +- 4. en documents supporting the Ilegations in your complaint. + +Response: Since discovery is still coi Defend , cannot produce all written documents su The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has requested rclev to which the Defendant has categorically Ic Defendant expects some of those records to support tinuing in this matter, the Plaintiff/Counterporting the allegations in the concplaint. t documents from the bankruptcy trustee, ged objections, and the Plaintiff/Countere allegations in the complaint. + +- 5. All message pads, calendars of your sc dule or appointments or other documents containing your "massage" appointments; and + +Response: Objections: irrelevant, b •ensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and protected by Fifth Amendment. + +- 6. A complete copy of each and every e ibit which you intend to introduce or have considered introducing into evidence at trial. + +Response: Since discovery is continui g, the Plaintiff/ unter- endant does not know at this time the exhibits he intends to introd cc or consi C olGcing at trial. + +## CERTIFICATE OF ERVI + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a truf and co 'Silv a if the foregoing has been duly famished via O Email, O Facsimile, PIUS. Mail, Cl H Delivery, ID Federal Express this l ay of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm B 1-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()FOWLER [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-defendant + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +and files this his Response Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Sc dm Nn, to At m., ( m r ey J. c , P 1.370 and states as folio by and through his undersigned counsel, ssions and Answer to Interro suant to Florida Rule of Civil atory of rocedure + +### THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH DICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR P LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. , Individually, and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +C mplex Litigation, FIa.R.Civ.Pro 1.201 + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, ADMISSIONS AND INTERROG O1W Y EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO J. REQUEST FOR ATED EPTEMBER 16 2010 + +No. 502009CA040800 AG + +co + +O + +### EP TEIN'S RESPONSE TO RFA + +- i. te objects to the Request for su a irty (30) requests. Florida Rules o There are in excess of sixty (60) Reque +- 3. In addition to the objections above, wi 8, 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to th dmissions because the total, including Civil Procedure 1.370(a). is for Admissions including subparts. h regards to Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, Etl, 5, 6, 7, requests on the grounds tha they are + +### Epstein's Response t Edws' RFA & Interrogatory 02 9-16-10 + +irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpos which would be protected by the Fifth Amendment of of harassment, and require information e U.S. Constitution. + +4. In addition to the objection in Paragrap in Paragraphs 13, 14, 15, and 22, the Plaintiff/Counte requests are irrelevant and propounded for the purpose 1, with regard to Request for Admissions Defendant objects on the grounds that the of harassment. + +5. In addition to the objection in Paragra. 19, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the g purpose of harassment, and the response would disclose attorney-client work product communications I, with regard to Paragraphs 16, 17, 18, ounds are irrelevant, propoUnded for the wire the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant to + +6. In addition to the objection in Para' Admissions in Paragraph 25, 28, and 29, the Plaintiff/ that the requests are irrelevant, overbroad and propoun aph~4th regard to the Request for tinter-Defendant objects on the grounds ed for the purpose of harassmenit. + +### CE TIFI TE OF ERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and corr fu fished via O Email, O Facsimile, aY6.S. Mail, ray of October, 2010 to: t copy of the foregoing has been duly Hand Delivery, O Federal E,Jpress this + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG +Epstein's Response to Edws' RFA & Interrogatory 02 9-16-10 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +FOWLER [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-defendant + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +## THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH DICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR P LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, J. and L.M., Individually , Individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +C mplex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro 1.201 + +C e No. 502009CA040800 AG + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFF IN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTI J. GENERAL INTERROGATO• ES D ED SEPTEMB + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Je "ct ...."Epstein, and pursuant to Florida Rules i Procedu Interrogatories of Defendant/ unter-P aintiff, Bradlc e, J. and through his undersigned counsel, files his objections to the General and would state as follows: + +1. With reg o Interrogatories 2, 3, Defendant objet propound Fifth use-the interrogatories seek i ose of harassment, and ask of the United States Constitution. , 5, 6, 8, and 9, the Plaintiff/Counterelevant information, are burdensome, are or information which is protected by the + +With regard to Interrogatories 10, I I, d 16, the interrogatories seek information that is irrelevant, burdensome to produce, and unlikely o lead to discoverable information. + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG +Epstein's Ans to [REDACTED] General Interrogatories + +3. With regard to Interrogatory No. 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this 18th day of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdcaea2694c124ab59f84904328ce10d86f40502 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152/EFTA02769152.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,938 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769152.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 15882, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.3, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.928, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.0509999999999, + 57.50999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.0509999999999, + 101.25 + ], + [ + 305.928, + 101.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.096, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 404.869, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 404.869, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 199.096, + 306.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL 1ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 346.2460632324219, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 346.2460632324219, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 251.29799999999997, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.373, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.81399999999996, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 486.81399999999996, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 84.373, + 119.88 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.007, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 486.81399999999996, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 486.81399999999996, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 122.007, + 323.19 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF -DEFENDANT E \nOBJECT' \nDATED SEPTEMBER 1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.326, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.067, + 282.68999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.067, + 321.3445739746094 + ], + [ + 132.326, + 321.3445739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.373, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 487.42100000000005, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 487.42100000000005, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 84.373, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT [REDACTED] INTERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.431, + 259.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 467.997, + 259.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 467.997, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 141.431, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, JE \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIF \nRE UEST TO PRODUCE DATE \n<59 \n. isippipSE TO R", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.155, + 300.7578125 + ], + [ + 496.615478515625, + 300.7578125 + ], + [ + 496.615478515625, + 401.8076171875 + ], + [ + 100.155, + 401.8076171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF ERVI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.769, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 374.519, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 374.519, + 335.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 222.769, + 335.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nP LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.998, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.70099999999996, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.70099999999996, + 158.103515625 + ], + [ + 311.998, + 158.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, \nADMISSIONS AND INTERROG O1W \nY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO \nJ. REQUEST FOR \nATED EPTEMBER 16 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.443, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 505.2057189941406, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 505.2057189941406, + 392.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 90.443, + 392.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EP TEIN'S RESPONSE TO \nRFA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.1, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 414.04400634765625, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 414.04400634765625, + 522.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 182.1, + 522.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Response t \nEdws' RFA & Interrogatory 02 9-16-10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 518.5787963867188, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 518.5787963867188, + 98.572021484375 + ], + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 98.572021484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CE TIFI TE OF \nERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.34099999999998, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 375.2528076171875, + 422.01000000000005 + ], + [ + 375.2528076171875, + 436.4420471191406 + ], + [ + 220.34099999999998, + 436.4420471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's Response to Edws' RFA & Interrogatory 02 9-16-10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.97799999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 219.97799999999998, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nP LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 314.426, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 513.8314819335938, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 513.8314819335938, + 159.228515625 + ], + [ + 314.426, + 159.228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFF IN'S OBJECTIONS TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTI J. \nGENERAL INTERROGATO\u2022 ES D ED SEPTEMB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.085, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 503.9951171875, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 503.9951171875, + 393.2285461425781 + ], + [ + 94.085, + 393.2285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.625, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 227.625, + 206.54999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769152" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2010a2dbd75094fe200ab9a122f197976e43fd66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACII COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Debra 2291 Everhigh Acres Road Clewiston, FL 33440-5673 + +'c, + +co ' + +•-n + +s•cs c.3 + +0 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED s ipear lefore a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., 777 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 901, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, on the 27th day of January, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have witJYyi4t at that time and place the following: + +If you fail to appear, you ntempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney r the co rt, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on J Pt PVYtq&t ZZ , 2010. + +For the + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Sir Esq. Burnett, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +. Ackerman, Jr., s Lilly Ann M, Esq. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cc290679cfa5af61379818cc97c91b493c0d352 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166/EFTA02769166.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769166.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1269, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACII COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.668, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 537.522, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 537.522, + 78.228515625 + ], + [ + 289.668, + 78.228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 389.6247253417969, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 389.6247253417969, + 270.978515625 + ], + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 270.978515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769166" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35db11d08b6481ad470aca1311870da156544769 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. a individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Leh 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to a \d a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., 777 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 901, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, on the 26th day of January, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with yti.i at that time and place the following: + +If you fail to appear, yo contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to a ar by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney ourt, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on 2010. + +an, Jr., Esq. Lilly Ann Esq. + +I... Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lill Ann Esq. & Burnett, P.A. , Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14ih Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b3ced3bbd727559babff314d563da573f86b8ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167/EFTA02769167.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769167.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1242, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.668, + 34.019999999999996 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 34.019999999999996 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 77.0985107421875 + ], + [ + 289.668, + 77.0985107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 389.9908447265625, + 254.34 + ], + [ + 389.9908447265625, + 269.478515625 + ], + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 269.478515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769167" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..286c23d92b6c4150858faf2dd86ac7bdf5e2cb9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +TO: Mike Fisten 1403 Saint Gabrielle Lane, Apt. 3211 Weston, FL 33326-4032 + +depositions at the law offices of YOU ARE COMMANDED to Avenue, 21' Floor, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394, on the 19th day of January, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in tit' ion and to have with you at that time and place the following: ear before a person authorized by -law to tape Burnett, P.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. Tgd + +If you fail to appear, yo contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or/the-court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on AM'S WY ! 22 2010. + +For By: ose Lilly Ann Esq. + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lill r. & Esq. Burnett, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73b46c530418fdec114fc3e41bc167a20cc0dce2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168/EFTA02769168.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769168.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1273, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.668, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 537.522, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 537.522, + 77.103515625 + ], + [ + 289.668, + 77.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 390.0047607421875, + 255.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 390.0047607421875, + 270.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 212.09999999999997, + 270.2335205078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769168" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5badabba060d077b6260641f91c53c96c04a2c0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +V'T CO ROTJ.HSTEIN individually, MO , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Ken Jenne 2400 Emerson Circle Hollywood, FL 33021 Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to a depositions at the law offices of Avenue, 21st Floor, Fort Lauderdale, FL for the taking of your deposition in th. following: • re a person authorized by law to take .A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. Third 33394, on the 25th day of January, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., ion and to have with you at that time and place the + +If you fail to appear, yo 1-m contempt of court. 0 + +You are subpoenaed to ap'p'ear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on (PnIllY 22 2010. + +osephrCAckerman, Lilly Ann Esq. + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Esq. & Burnett, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05f365f8fd2a1032b50ed16d27cb7ae7b30b06b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169/EFTA02769169.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769169.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1230, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.274, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 77.853515625 + ], + [ + 290.274, + 77.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.312, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 390.7408447265625, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 390.7408447265625, + 270.603515625 + ], + [ + 213.312, + 270.603515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769169" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4124d08dd934b3e3f65e5d7b3b41f53b2b7cae37 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +I + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION c + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Adler 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +t AAN,Y YOU ARE COMMANDED tt ear lefore a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 21st Floor, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394, on the 20th day of January, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +Ca + +• CJ + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on 2010. + +Lilly Ann erman, Jr., Esq. Esq. + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lill Ann Esq. & Burnett, P.A. , Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6dbf763d37eb4ff942626a9f3e1b17669e70cec0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170/EFTA02769170.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769170.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1284, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 539.6229999999999, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 539.6229999999999, + 77.478515625 + ], + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 77.478515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.057, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.805908203125, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.805908203125, + 270.31201171875 + ], + [ + 213.057, + 270.31201171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769170" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7185cd7badee645dbb45fea4835a13427ef05a6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Kretschmar 2833 NE 35th Court Fort Lauderdale, FL 33038 Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +S C C) YOU ARE COMMANDED to a b e a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Itb t .A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. Third Avenue, 215t Floor, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394, on the 4th day of February, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +• 7; + +If you fail to appear, you may be, in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or;the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on %a eni ter 2; 2010. + +Forth Lilly Ann Esq. + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lill Ann Esq. & Burnett, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41b174e7468eb247e298f1df5c4378015f6a79b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171/EFTA02769171.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769171.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1261, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 77.478515625 + ], + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 77.478515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769171" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8eda2f51965ee04a6faffa0ec42de3b13972ead4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff, +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M., Individually + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED] EXPERT INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT +REPORTS DATED NOVEMBER 22, 2010** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files his Objections to each and every Interrogatory Numbered 1-16, and propounded by Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] in his Expert Interrogatories and Request to Produce Expert Reports bearing Certificate of Service date of November 22, 2010 and directed to Plaintiff, as these Interrogatories exceeds the allowable amount pursuant to this Court's Order dated October 5, 2010 and [REDACTED] must obtain the Court's permission prior to propounding any additional interrogatories. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this 20 day of December, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By Jo h Fla 54 FO BURNETT P.A. oint West Flagler Drive alm Beach, Florida 33401 phone: (561) 802-9044 aesimile: (561) 802-9976 , Jr. + +> Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff Counter-defendant + +W:1807431DisecnrrylFpsin's (S. . to Eq7 bumps 11-22-2010 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddce7004a294fe416e58a947661f5dc1ad2a3b19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172/EFTA02769172.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769172.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1895, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.57, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 317.461, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 534.767, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 534.767, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 317.461, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 594.54 + ], + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 594.54 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769172" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d9d749c9ff2dcf92c3aa90219008ae955550717 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, +██████ J. ██████, Individually, +and L.M., Individually + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO +DEFENDANT, ██████ J. ██████ EXPERT INTERROGATORIES AND +REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS DATED NOVEMBER 22, 2010** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.340(e) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Notice of Serving Answers to Defendant, ██████ J. ██████ Expert Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 and Request to Produce Expert Reports numbered 14-16 bearing certificate of service date of November 22, 2010. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email, Facsimile, U.S. Mail, Hand Delivery, Federal Express this 20 day of December, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +FILED +10 DEC 28 PM 4:04 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 8 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Josh L. Ackerman. Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +901 Point + +777 South Flagl + +West Palm BeacHJpeida 33401 + +Telephon 802-9044 + +Facsimile: 802-9976 + +Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ efendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..961f92127332fd7fc0f258310fa85f849589d67c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174/EFTA02769174.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769174.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1724, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.726, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 532.674, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 532.674, + 140.94 + ], + [ + 315.726, + 140.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT, \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 EXPERT INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST TO PRODUCE EXPERT REPORTS DATED NOVEMBER 22, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.264, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 513.2819999999999, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 513.2819999999999, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 87.264, + 375.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.948, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 216.948, + 511.9200000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769174" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f6c323102f676317457d628c8e07b0118f2c82c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +DEC 28 2010 + +SHARON R. BOGGER +CLERK & COMMISSIONER +CIRCUIT COURT +CIVIL DIVISION + +PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, files this Motion to Appoint Commissioner for the entry of an Order appointing ATG Legal Serve, or any qualified notary public in the States of Illinois as commissioner with full authority to take, report, transcribe and certify the depositions of Thane Ritchie and Michael Legamaro to be taken by Plaintiff, pursuant to Fla. Stat. §92.251, the Uniform Foreign Deposition Act, and states: + +1. The purpose of this deposition is to obtain testimony regarding the witness' knowledge regarding issues pertaining to the subject lawsuit which is likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in this action + +2. Illinois law does not authorize the issuance of a subpoena for the taking of a deposition unless a commission has been appointed. Accordingly, the plaintiff moves for the Appointment of ATG Legal Serve, One S. Wacker Drive, 24th Floor, Chicago, IL 60606 as the commissioner to take the depositions of Thane Ritchie and Michael Legamaro. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court grant his + +Motion to Appoint Commissioner. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 21/4 +day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys +for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward +Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +FOWLER [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +[REDACTED] Point +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +[mah] W:\80743\MOTION69-App Comm Illinois.MSG\12/21/10-13:36) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b514bc81c522827817169a622539bf1da273597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176/EFTA02769176.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769176.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2332, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.452, + 70.818 + ], + [ + 527.826, + 70.818 + ], + [ + 527.826, + 125.356 + ], + [ + 328.452, + 125.356 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.05199999999999, + 322.344 + ], + [ + 510.858, + 322.344 + ], + [ + 510.858, + 336.18199999999996 + ], + [ + 86.05199999999999, + 336.18199999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 137.05900000000003 + ], + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 137.05900000000003 + ], + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 150.846 + ], + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 150.846 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769176" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1634287c572db53b17431b1242c0dd2ebb034670 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +2010 DEC 28 PH 3:15 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIVIL RIGHTS +FILED + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: Monday, January 3, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Judge David F. Crow + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 9C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion to Appoint Commissioner in the State of Illinois + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 21st day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a24f07401e29d16250a950553a1e8bff1b290768 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178/EFTA02769178.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769178.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1274, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.34, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.27, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 330.27, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.704, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 363.59999999999997, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 363.59999999999997, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 232.704, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 60.60000000000001, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 272.70000000000005, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 272.70000000000005, + 587.25 + ], + [ + 60.60000000000001, + 587.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.13, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 378.75, + 643.95 + ], + [ + 215.13, + 643.95 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769178" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31269604ec3b561f9ba2e7d9561c54fcbc04aec7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v . + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation + +F1a.R.Civ.Pro. 1201- Civil — Div. + +Case No. 502009CA0408007OOOCMB + +-0 ca rn-- •-• Itz re 0 ▪ **.X.tr ri** sr N + +Judge: AG — David c + +## **PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S CO MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTI** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and throw s '' ersigned representative and pursuant to Sections 90.202(6X12) and 90.203, Florida(2006), files this Motion to Take Judicial Notice and in support thereof would s °flowing: + +- Efiftqcs , ') has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment against Epstein, which is grss t for hearing before this Court on January 5, 2011. +- 1. The Defendant, J. +- 2. The basis of t s Response in Opposition to Summary Judgment con ms in filed court records in the following Cases: + - A. In r othstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Debtor, Case No. 09-3 79 I -RBR filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, uthern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division Herbert Stettin, Chapter II Trustee, Plaintiff v. Adler and Katie Adler, Defendants. ADD. PRO. NO. 10-02612-BKC-RBR-A Motion for +- 3. Section 90.202(6), Florida Statutes, provides this Court discretion to take judicial notice of "records of any court of this state..." See also Michael Falls v. National Environmental Products, et al., 665 So. 2d 320, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (holding that "it is fitting and proper that a court should take judicial notice of other actions...which bear a relationship to the case at bar"). + - 4. Section 90.202(12), moreover, allows this court to take judicial notice of records + +that are "not subject to dispute because they are capable of accurate and ready determination by resort of sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned." + +5. The Plaintiff Epstein requests the court take judicial notice of the pleadings in its appendix filed in response and opposition to the Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment. The appendix of pleadings is necessary to establish the efforts of Ep eit in order to obtain records necessary for discovery and the actions of the Defendant those efforts. The documents are accurate copies of the filed pleadin is the understanding of the undersigned counsel that the court in thwarting resaid cases. It access to PACER at www.flsb.uscourts.gov where the court can directly reviei ts h d. uments on line. + +6. There is no prejudice to the Defend to this motion because and his counsel have actively participated i oceedings in bankruptcy court, with the exception of one document which is the I ent in the appendix. + +7. Alternatively, the 6 quests leave to obtain certified copies of the documents from the court filed f11 ose in the proceedings in this case when they become available. + +8. Th ders ned counsel certifies that he has attempted to resolve this matter without the n a ring with counsel for and will continue to do so. + +ORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests the court take judicial notice of th records contained in the appendix of the Plaintiff Epstein which is filed in opposition to Defendant, J. Motion for Summary Judgment, for the reasons set forth above. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTWY that a trueecorrect copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via O Email, O da Facsimile, .S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this ? day of December, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +A + +g + +Ackerman, Jr. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +ktail WAS0743 i Notice LAMM/1044:3S) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10ec5c88a14bbd1cf752b029d758a4f3270edd9c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180/EFTA02769180.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769180.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3973, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.11, + 43.419999999999995 + ], + [ + 540.7276611328125, + 43.419999999999995 + ], + [ + 540.7276611328125, + 86.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 292.11, + 86.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S CO \nMOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.65, + 279.725 + ], + [ + 449.7724914550781, + 279.725 + ], + [ + 449.7724914550781, + 308.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 208.65, + 308.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.034, + 104.25 + ], + [ + 406.13812255859375, + 104.25 + ], + [ + 406.13812255859375, + 120.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 242.034, + 120.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769180" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e19515d3ab720f5c5b28fcddb00cb025440b50c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## NOTICE OF HEA + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that th following: ed has called up for hearing the + +DATE: Tuesday, January 4, 2011 4s t.l . + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Judge David F. + +PLACE: 205 N. DixlA hway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 9C + +## SPECIFIC TO BE HEARD: + +r r - + +laintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice and Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Relating to Deposition of Robert Critton + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 29th day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8ee48ffac7eb93b768645d52b9143642a34c03b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183/EFTA02769183.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769183.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1176, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.23, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.59000000000003, + 329.43 + ], + [ + 383.916, + 329.43 + ], + [ + 383.916, + 344.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 253.59000000000003, + 344.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.25, + 548.772 + ], + [ + 293.6961669921875, + 548.772 + ], + [ + 293.6961669921875, + 565.6125030517578 + ], + [ + 80.25, + 565.6125030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.182, + 118.57 + ], + [ + 401.25, + 118.57 + ], + [ + 401.25, + 131.93 + ], + [ + 238.182, + 131.93 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769183" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..772bcd0c00a25a3dbe78d9462dc292c95b74db2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201- Civil — Div. + +Case No. 502009CA0408003OOOCMB + +Judge: AG — David + +## PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER RELATING TO DEPOSITION OF ROBE TTON + +'04 X: 0 rn rn cTr:: CO a rt • \$ ce + I rani + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and throw ersigned representative and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure file t ' hi on for Protective Order Relating AS 1\ ., to the Deposition of Robert Critton for the reaso ort , below: + +- 1. The Plaintiff has presently ed lfie deposition of Robert Critton in this matter for January 10, 2011. +- 2. The undersigne s unavailable that day due to specially set trials in the case of Penelope Lankheim v Flo Atlantic University, beginning January 10th through January 12th, 2011 before J e and the case of Toll Bros., Inc. v. The Decorators Unlimited Inc. and Nati e tual Insurance Company, January 13th through January 18, 2011 before Judge S A +- 3. The undersigned has requested counsel for the Defendant to reschedule the deposition but has not obtained or received a response. +- 4. The undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. +- 5. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has and will continue to make an effort to resolve this matter without the need of a hearing. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this court enter an order preventing the deposition of Robert Critton from occurring in this matter on January 10, 2011 and requiring it to be rescheduled at a time mutually convenient to the witness and counsel for all parties. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFy that a true asd.correct copy of the foreg has en duly furnished via O Email, 2' Facsimile, BT S. Mail, O Hand Deliv deral Express this Inay of December, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A West Palm Beach, FL 33409 1 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +%) + +4C + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> C.) Jo ph L. Ackerman, Jr. By: 6L-41 ; 4` Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +O + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +lull W VICI743\NIcxico for Protective Order re Rosen Cotton Depo JLAC12/29/10-I4121 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..046d6c3e03472ac7770a4b84b779db24144c166e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185/EFTA02769185.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769185.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2627, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.11, + 42.4375 + ], + [ + 541.4024658203125, + 42.4375 + ], + [ + 541.4024658203125, + 85.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 292.11, + 85.54998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR \nORDER RELATING TO DEPOSITION OF ROBE TTON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.524, + 278.055 + ], + [ + 498.834, + 278.055 + ], + [ + 498.834, + 308.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 142.524, + 308.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.824, + 214.272 + ], + [ + 403.88812255859375, + 214.272 + ], + [ + 403.88812255859375, + 231.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 238.824, + 231.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769185" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b98c7a82550430e1a5d968a9e691ffba2fd7ad8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +THIS CAUSE, having come on before the to Appoint Commissioner, and the Court havi duly advised in the premises, it is, PlaintiffJeffrey Epstein's Motion gument of counsel, and being otherwise + +A + +## ORDERED and ADJUDGEH. + +- 1. Plaintiff's Mot' n to point Commissioner in the State of Illinois is hereby Granted. +- 2. Th irm of ATG Legal Serve is authorized to act as commissioner to issue subpoenas, t to vt eotape, report, transcribe and certify the depositions of Thane Ritchie and Michael aro in the above-styled case. + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 0 AVINT COMMISSI0ilisitR" + +DeO" fand ORDERED in at , Florida, this L, Nif day of + +\j4/1 , 2011 + +CIR UIT JU + +cc: Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e023f7f833312fcdd7527314438ea2d98c749c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187/EFTA02769187.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769187.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1034, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDERED and ADJUDGEH.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.78, + 434.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 270.135, + 434.79888916015625 + ], + [ + 270.135, + 449.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 111.78, + 449.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 346.51800000000003, + 69.63600000000001 + ], + [ + 543.375, + 69.63600000000001 + ], + [ + 543.375, + 126.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 346.51800000000003, + 126.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 0 AVINT COMMISSI0ilisitR\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.11800000000001, + 322.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 545.8496704101562, + 322.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 545.8496704101562, + 337.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 98.11800000000001, + 337.43353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769187" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddbea7ab5df8cb467992d69946d7a6322177cfe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## C AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPff COMMISGKI + +7: ^ 1-O ,-v-v! "eon 3:1` I I C. ;S• + +THIS CAUSE, having come on before the Court upon PlaintiffJeffrey Epstein's Motion to Appoint Commissioner, and the Court having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise ( duly advised in the premises, it is, + +## ORDERED and ADJUDGED: + +- 1. Plaintiff's Motion Granted. Commissioner in the State of New York is hereby +- 2. The firm of U,S. Legal Support is authorized to act as commissioner to issue subpoenas, to take, videotape, report, transcribe and certify the deposition of A.J. DiScala in the above-styled + +DOrENSAnd ORDERED in at West Palm teach, Florida, this 3%ddy of + +, 2010. + +CIRCUIT JUDG + +cc: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. One E. Broward Blvd. Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Ackerman, Point- 901-W, 777 S. Flagler Dr. WPB, FL 33401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a9b0bc76e3faa70d544d8185e13366549fa8c30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188/EFTA02769188.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769188.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1255, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.798, + 69.91799999999999 + ], + [ + 516.7899780273438, + 69.91799999999999 + ], + [ + 516.7899780273438, + 127.10302734375 + ], + [ + 318.798, + 127.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C \nAGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPff COMMISGKI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.64, + 252.3699951171875 + ], + [ + 513.3414916992188, + 252.3699951171875 + ], + [ + 513.3414916992188, + 325.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 71.64, + 325.20000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDERED and ADJUDGED:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.565, + 421.13400000000007 + ], + [ + 245.25772094726562, + 421.13400000000007 + ], + [ + 245.25772094726562, + 435.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.565, + 435.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769188" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a7cafde7c4e04046f90dbbbd5b71e89e8abcdeb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] +J. [REDACTED], individually and L.M., +individually, + +Defendants. + +**AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF,** +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO** +**TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE** + +2011 JAN - 4 PM 4:36 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL SERVICE + +THIS CAUSE having come on by the parties in this case on January 4, 2011, upon Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Take Judicial Notice. The parties have agreed to the entry of this Order and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Court to Take Judicial Notice is hereby GRANTED. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this + +4/4 +day of January, 2011. + +![]()David F. [REDACTED], +Circuit Judge + +Copies Provided to: +See Service List on next page + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXMBAG Order on Motion to Take Judicial Notice Page -2- + +## SERVICE LIST + +L. Ackerman,Jr., Esquire Lill A. Esquire & Burnett, P.A. 901 Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +(nal) W:40743 \ Order on PlamtilTs Motion to Takc + +04 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af2e53c85ec59da9338b92ef9fe2492e9c34b44e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189/EFTA02769189.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769189.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1609, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 322.99800000000005, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 322.99800000000005, + 136.07999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 322.99800000000005, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 519.948, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 519.948, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 322.99800000000005, + 297.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.582, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 348.41131591796875, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 348.41131591796875, + 151.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 258.582, + 151.61248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769189" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bddc3731fbeae3f5d66d156a000b91cabdf875c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.md @@ -0,0 +1,383 @@ +**IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA** + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +**Plaintiff,** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +v. + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +**PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT +TO HIS RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure files this his notice of his intention to rely on the attached exhibit as part of his Response to Defendant [REDACTED] Motion for Summary Judgment. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 30+ day of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, + +FILED +11 JAN - 4 AM 10: 43 +SHARON R. BUCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 2 + +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()777 South Flagler, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +[mah] W:\80743\NOF Supplemental Exhibit to Epstein's Response to Edw' MSJ{12/30/10-15:39} + +other relief described below, and states: Trustee, Herbert Stettin, through his undersigned counsel, moves this Court to fix the amount of attorneys fees and sanctions to be awarded infer , Ate debtor and against Qtask, Inc. ("Qtask"), arising out of this Court's Order of,Cont p against Qtask (D.E. 776), and for \ IC + +#### I. INTRODUCTION. + +#### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.tlsb.uscourts.gov + +IN RE: + +ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., + +Debtor. + +CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR + +Chapter 11 + +#### TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO FIX AND COMPEL PAYMENT BY QTASK OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND SANCTIONS FOR ITS CONTEMPT OF COURT + +As the Court no doubt re already has been found in contempt of court for failing to comply with a Rule su poena issued by the Trustee on December 8, 2009 (D.E. 95). In the Order of C (i) the Trustee's tome fees and costs calculated from February 9, 2009 and continuing thereafter, 1) \$5000 per day sanction to the Trustee for continued non-compliance, effective y 9, 2010. In addition, to assist the Court in ascertaining the degree of Qtask's non-co liance with the Trustee's outstanding discovery and in conjunction with the Order of Contempt, the Court appointed Robert Moody ("Moody") as its expert to review and report back to the Court. mpt, the Court found both that Qtask would be responsible for paying + +On December 13, 2010, Moody submitted his Expert Report, docketed on December 17, 2010 as DE #1241. That report unequivocally and thoroughly supports the positions the Trustee had taken before the Court for the many months of Qtask's non-compliance, therefore reaffirming the basis for all of the Court's preceding orders, including the awarded sanctions. + +## II. THE EXPERT REPORT PROVES OTASK'S NONCOMPLIANCE. + +Verbatim highlights of the findings from the Expert Report include: + +#### Qtask Has Not Complied with the Subpoena [D.E. 095] or the March 8, 2010 Order ID.E. #411 k + +"Based upon a review of the record, the interviews conducted provided to me, it is clear that the Trustee has not received the has not been provided the information necessary to be able received as true and correct." er materiaUsoftware ation it has requested and it on the information it has + +Report, at page 6. + +#### Qtask's Productions to Date Rave Not Complied with the Subpoena or the March 8, 2010 Order: + +"Initial productions were uselesa + +The initial productions b Qtask were CD/DVDs containing what essentially exists as the computer data version of a ru on seltanCe. The initial production consisted of a lot of computer code and data but no format o tructLre for the Trustee to use. + +The second pro n as reported by Qtask, did provide structure through specialized programming but, s re a by the Trustee, did not have the functionality or ease of use that the Trustee needed to work with the data set." + +Report, at pa' + +#### Qtask Has Prevented Compliance with the Subpoena by Blockina the Trustee's Access to the Shadowbox: + +"Access to the "shadowbox" has been blocked. The Trustee still does not have the passwords associated with the individual user accounts. + +Access to the shadowbox has not been provided. During the initial interviews, the Trustee disclosed that the passwords on the "shadow box" had not been reset and that there were users and projects that the Trustee could not access. Shortly after this interview, this information was shared with Qtask. Qtask responded that this was the first they had heard of the problem. As of this date, it is my understanding that this issue still remains." + +Report, at page 7. + +#### Qtask has Prevented the Trustee from Understanding the Universe of Data Available so the Trustee can Narrow its Search: + +"Cannot determine the total universe of potential or responsive data. + +The size of the responsive data universe can only be resolved through a review of the Qtask environment. The Trustee has stated that it is requesting that Qtask only, comply with its subpoena and provide access to the information which is responsive to this sub poss, + +Qtask has stated that it is complying with the Court's order and p m. t e data within the limits set by the Court. + +From my interviews and review of the information prow' ed, rustee appears to be asking for a broader range of access. This need for bro r a ss is a byproduct of the investigative process and the lack of information which ha ved to date." + +Report, at page 8. + +#### The Court Has AlrekProvided a Proper Mechanism to Protect Individual Users' Rights: + +"If the Trustee identifies a pat ar user or project, the Court through its order has already provided a mechanism to prgtcc er, the user's projects and the user's specific data." + +Report at page 8. + +"Qtask has raised the that many of its clients have customer, private or highly sensitive data that cann viewed or accessed without appropriate clearance. + +As previously addressed, the concern of Qtask regarding their client's data must not be taken lightly. No matter the source, highly sensitive data must be protected and where possible be excluded. f e"Sn a casual review, if determined that the information is not relevant to the Trustee's itiyesti tion. Based upon the March 8, 2010 order, the Trustee and the Court have , made pr igloos for the owner of the data to be informed and to object to the production, if nec + +Report, at page II. + +#### Qtask Can Monitor the Trustee's Investigation through the Shadowbox: + +"Qtask is monitoring the Trustee's investigation. + +Through interviews, Qtask has acknowledged that it knows what and when the Trustee has accessed on Qtask because they are part of the same projects as the Trustee and they maintain administrative and technical control over the workspace the Trustee is conducting its investigation in. + +A review of the Qtask environment shows that this is an inherent feature of Qtask and not something that was created to monitor the Trustee. Regardless of how it came into existence, the fact is this feature does exist. Furthermore, the "shadow box" being hosted on the Qtask network does offers a significant security risk to the Trustee's investigation." + +#### Qtask Has Stopped Even Attempting to Comply With the Trustee's Requests for Information from °task: + +'The Trustee and Qtask have both acknowledged that Qtask has stopped complying with . these subsequent requests because Qtask feels that they are too burdensome and it\*ould not be made to "run back to the warehouse numerous times" to meet the Trustees demands." + +Report, at page 9. + +"The Trustee must be able to make requests for ad targets of interest. The Trustee must be able to rely on the ' it requests." nformation as it identifies nd the accuracy of the data + +Report, at page 9. / el\ + +#### Qtask Has Used Wrongfully Assertions of 3rd Parties' Rights to Obstruct the Trustee's Investigation: + +"Qtask has repeatedly claim that-the information contained within their system does not belong to them, it belongs to their client. They have stated that they are the gatekeepers and that they are not able to provide,iec ause they do not own the information. + +Qtask's classification o ,,data is correct but its role in its protection is flawed. + +Qtask operates a o pany very similar to many other service bureaus such as America Online, Hotmail,ennail, yahoo, etc. Each of these companies has procedures in place to produce information tharis requested. + +\"fr an obligation to secure the information when properly requested and should follow t dures to produce the information as required. + +task should not be taking the position of questioning the Trustee as to why the information is needed or what they will be doing with the information. They are the intermediary between the housed data and the requesting party. + +Report, at page 10. + +Qtask's argument and justification for failing to produce client data, takes the form that they are the gatekeeper to the data and not the owner and cannot produce what they do not own, is flawed." + +Report, at page 11. + +#### Qtask Has Wrongfully Obstructed the Trustee's Investigation by Attempting to Filter the Trustee's Requests for Data: + +"Qtask has requested that they be informed as to all data the Trustee desires access to and once they have been informed of the data targets, they will determine if it is appropriate and provide access. + +Once again, Qtask is attempting to fulfill a role greater than that of the gate . As the gatekeeper, their role is to provide a process to facilitate the request and delivery ata. k + +Determination as to appropriateness falls first on the Trustee and questioned, it then must fall on the Court." ateness is + +### Otask Cannot be Permitted to Control the Production Process: + +"Additionally, since Qtask is the target of the Tr Qtask's word as to which users and projects are responsiv ,S ) the Trustee, "they cannot afford to get this wrong." \ 's Investigation, acceptance of problematic. As stated by + +Report, page 12. + +# III. THE TRUSTEE REOUESTS SWIF'fC RT RESOLUTION. + +The actual prejudice and impa\_cro c ......, the Estate and its creditors by Qtask's willful and continued noncompliance with thi'itrt's , any court orders is measurable. In economic terms, the Estate has already spent o \$100,000 in attorneys fees for rehashing and revisiting the same meritless arguments with task for a one year period. The Trustee will shortly provide the Court with an updated omeys ? ee and cost affidavit to liquidate these sums. + +In c terms (but which may well impact Estate recoveries), the Estate has not bee conclude critical investigations. One example of actual, existing prejudice is the inability conclude the Qtask Adler ("Adler") data review and investigation where the Trustee has a specially set trial on Adler's adversary proceeding scheduled before Judge Cohn on February 14, 2011. The potential data being hidden by Qtask pertaining to Adler could be a pot of gold. The Trustee has already submitted to the Court the Scott Rothstein internal e-mail imagination. What are they hiding? where he directed his partners to use Qtask because the RRA servers were less than secure. In deposition, Adler makes no secret, in fact brags about being the RRA architect who brought Qtask in house to RRA. Robert Buschel ("Buschel"), a former RRA partner, Qtask shareholder and present Qtask lawyer has been the front man in keeping the Trustee away from Qtask's data during the last year. It is no coincidence that the deposition transcript that Busc used to support his recent frivolous and bad faith motion to disqualify Berger as en in the Adler adversary. To say Adler and Buschel are working in conce is stretch of t s'• + +But additionally, even after the appointment of Mood 4S? hold firm and not comply with the Court's orders. The I no reason why at any time since the Order to Compel or the Order of Cont t iv,t task couldn't have modified its position and provided compliance on such ira s ' \*lc o tter as obeying a subpoena. What did and Buschel continued to Qtask ever have to gain by not complyi that Moody spoke to Buschel an preview of where the Expert Per ps even worse, the Expert Report makes clear ut all of the pending issues and both sides had a heading. Instead, Qtask has continued to dig in its heels. + +Based upon the) ord as it exists and the unique timing circumstances of the Trustee needing to prom ( c con o ude all of his investigations, the Trustee asks the Court to expedite granting all fo wing relief: + +- Holding a status conference or other hearing to set procedures for going forward based upon the Expert Report and the Trustee's requested relief set forth below. +- 2. Liquidating the accrued attorneys fees and the \$5000 per day non-compliance fine to a final judgment. + +- 3. Increasing the \$5000 per day fine to \$25,000 per day for continued noncompliance. +- 4. Ordering the immediate incarceration of any Qtask officer who directed the contempt of court until full compliance by Qtask occurs. +- 5. Because it is cost and time effective to do so, appointing Moody as t Court's monitor with obligations to regularly report back to the Court on an extremely e ited sis. +- 6. Liquidating the amount of fees incurred by Moody for hi wo a the Court's expert and entering a judgment against Qtask for same. +- 7. Granting leave of court to the Trustee to file a priate motion to determine the culpability of Buschel in these proceedings, so as to to is assess on a joint and several basis the total attorneys fee award and fine against sch n Qtask. + +!t + +& BE ER SINGERMAN, P.A. torneys for the Chapter I I Trustee 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 1000 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 755-9500 Facsimile: (305) 714.4340 + +Dated: December 29, 2010. t y submitted, + +By: /s/ Charles H. Lichtman + +Charles H. Lichtman c I ichtman@herxersingerman.com Florida Bar No. 501050 + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via Regular U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, fax, email and/or overnight delivery, as indicated, upon all parties on the attached Service List this 29th day of December, 2010. + +/s/ Charles H. Lichtman + +Charles H. Lichtman + +aS S + +iS 9 + +### SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Marianella Morales, Esquire Authorized Agent For Joining Creditors Avenida Francisco de Miranda Torre Provincial "A" Piso 8 Caracas, Venezuela (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +John H. Genovese, Esq Robert F. Elgidely, Esq. Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Esq. Genovese Joblove & Battista, PA Bank Of America Tower at International Place 100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 4400 Miami, Florida 33131 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington, Office in the Grove Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 kcoffev@coffeyburlington.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +The Honorable Herbert M. Ste One Biscayne Tower Suite 3700 Two South Biscayne B Miami, Florida 33131 (VIA U.S. MAIIAttd E IL) + +John G. Bi John M. Tripp S 110 Sixth Street Fifteen oor Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301 jgb@trivpscott.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Alison W. Lehr, Esq. Grisel Alonso, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Alison.Lehr@usdoj.gov Grisel.alonso@usdoi.gov (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Jeffrey R. Sonn, Esq. Sonn & Erez, PLC Broward Financial Cente 500 E. Broward Boule Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, orida 394 jsonn @sonnerez. (VIA C nd EMAIL) + +Trustee First Avenue anu, orida 33130 CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Tew Esq. Tew- LISP Four Seasons Tower 15th Floor 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3407 tt@tewlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Conrad & Scherer, LIP 633 South Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 bs@conradscherer.com JSilver@conradscherer.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Michael D. Seese, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP 1 E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33301 mseese@hinshawlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations P.O. Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via US. Mail) + +Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 7850 SW 6th Court Plantation, FL 33324 (Via US. Mail) + +Special Asst. U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 9, Stop 8000 51 SW Ist Avenue, #1114 Miami, Fl 33130 (Via US. Mail) + +United Healthcare Dept. CH 10151 Palatine, IL 60055 (Via US Mail) + +Special Asst. U.S. Mto IRS District Counsel 1000 S. Pine Isla d., 340 Plantation, FL (Via U.S. + +### SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Honorable Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting U.S. Attorney 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Fl 33132 (Via US. Mail) + +Daniel Mink Ovadia Levy do Renato Watches, Inc 14051 NW 14th Street Sunrise, Florida 33323 (Via U.S. Mall) + +William Moskowitz Mand 800 Corporate Dr Fort Laud wsalim (V orida 33334 corn and EMAIL) + +I thony Gruppo est Cypress Creek Road Nite 500 \* 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Anthonv.eruovo@usi.biz (VIA EMAIL) + +• + +The Hon 'c H. Holder, Jr. Att ral of the U.S. 950 Pen lvania Avenue, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 (Via US. Mail) + +Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 mare@nuriklaw.com (VIA EMAIL) + +BAST AMRON LLP SunTrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 1440 Miami, Florida 33131 bamron@bastamron.com ibast@bastantron.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +#### SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Mark Bloom, Esq. John B. Hutton, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, LLP 333 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 4400 Miami, FL 33131-3238 bloommegtlaw.coin hudoW@atlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Robert D. Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 rcrit@bciclaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Roth & Scholl Ann: Jeffrey C. Roth, Esq. Attorneys For Creditor Blue Capital Us East Coast Properties, L.P. 866 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, Fl 33146 ieff@rothandscholl.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP 1401 East Broward Blvd Suite 300 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 mtbooth@rinzlaw.com (VIA CM/ECF and E + +Arthur C. Neiw Esq. One E Brow Suite 1400 Ft. Lauderda I 3 1 aneiwinh@u w (VIA CM/f: w.com nd EMAIL) + +The Florida Bar Adria E. Quintela, Esq. Man Anthony Pascal, Esq. Lake Shore Plaza 11 1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130 Sunrise, FL 33323 aciuintel@flabar.org apascal@flabar.org (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Micheal W. Moskowitz, 800 Corporate Drive, Su Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33 mmo k witz@mm (VIA CM/ECF a + +Francis L. Katz B 2699 M. Esq. ro Faust Drive, 7th Floor a 33133 .c m CF and EMAIL) + +dley S. Shraiberg, Esq. 2385 NW Executive Drive Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 bshraibera@sfl-pa.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Henry S. Wula. CARLTON P.A. 525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 E-Mail: bwulf@curItonfields.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +EMESS Capital, LLC c/o Bruce A. Katzen, Esq. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17ik Floor Miami, Florida 33131 E-Mail: bkatzen@klucerkartlan.com jbermaneklucerkaolan.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +#### SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Ira Sochet, Trustee Revocable Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: pinhudson@arnstein.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Hagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: predmond@steamsweaver.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 350 East Las Olas Blvd Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: Michael.eoldbere@akerman.com Eval.bereer@akennan.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +LMB Funding Group do Robert C. Furr, Esq. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 337W Boca Raton, Florida 33431 E-Mail: rfurr@furrcohen.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL + +A. Gordich, Melissa Alagna, Esq. SEGALUGORDJCH P.A 801 Brickell A Suite 900 Miami, Flo P' Email: lag crordich.com Email: m ma illgordich.com (VIA F and EMAIL) + +Broward County Attn: Hollie N. Hawn, Esq. Government Center 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 E-Mail: hhawn@broward ore (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Steven J. ,Esq. Gray P.A. 1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 1600 Miami, Florida 33131 E-Mail -- (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Peter F. Valori, Esq. DAMIAN & VALORI LLP 1000 Brickell Avenue, Suityt 0 Miami, FL 33131 E-mail: .valori@dvll (VIA CM/ECF an + +ff Canon Financial 'cat, Inc. 158 Gaith • e, #200 Mount Si 08054 (Via + +ology Financing Services I, \1 01 Centurion Parkway North sonville, FL 32256 (Via US Mail) + +Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Company 220 Alhambra Circle, Suite 500 Coral Gables, FL 33134 (Via US Mail) + +Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc. 1140 West Loop North Houston, TX 77055 (Via US Mail) + +Florida Department of Revenue 501 S. Calhoun Street Room 201 Carlton Building Tallahassee, FL 32399 (Via US Mail) + +#### CASE NO. SERVICE LIST : 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +County Tax Collector 315 S. Calhoun Street Suite 210 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Via US Mail) + +Miami-Dade County Tax Collectors 140 West Flagler Street, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33130 (Via US Mail) + +Palm Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 (Via US Mail) + +THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY D. ITTLEMAN, P.A. 440 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (Via US Mail) + +Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via US Mail) + +F. McGinn, Esq. Bartlett Feinberg, P 155 Federal Street, 9m Floor Boston, E 02110 ffm@bostonbusinesslaw. CM/ECF E + +Darol H. M 99 Nesli Punta 3950 (VIA C CF and EMAIL) + +Jane A. Bee, Esq. Blank Rome LLP 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 Pee@blankrome.com (VIA EMAIL) + +Roderick F. Coleman, Esq. 400 South Dixie Highway, Suite 121 Boca Raton, FL 33432 rfc@colemanattorrievs.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Mark S. Haltzman, Esq. Lamm Rubenstone, LLC 3600 Horizon Blvd, Suite 200 Trevose, PA 19053 mhaltzman@lammrubensto m (VIA CM/ECF and EMS + +Robert C. Busshel, 100 S.E. Third A Fort Lauderdale, busshel (VIA nd EMAIL) + +Belo ck Pollack & Brant blic Accountants & Consultants, Biscayne Boulevard, Sixth Floor iami, FL 33131-2310 Atm: Richard Pollack (Via Email and U.S. Mail) + +MELAND RUSSIN & BUDWICK, P.A. 3000 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Ann: James C. Moon, Esq. 'moon@ melandrussin.com Attn: Peter D. Russin, Esq. prussin@melandrussin.corn Attn: Michael S. Budwick, Esq. mbudwick@melandrussin.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Gary S. Blake, Esq. 1499 W. Palmetto Park Rd Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33486 gblake@iglawmet (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Melinda S. Thornton, Esq. Assistant County Attorney County Attorney's Office 2810 Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. First Street Miami, Fl 33128-1993 Email: eao.bkc@miarnidade.eov (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +SLATKIN & P.A. Attorneys for Adler and Katie Adler One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 609 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone 954.745.5880 Facsimile 954.745.5890 islatkin@slatkinrevnolds.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +ASSOULINE & BERLOWE, P.A. 213 East Sheridan Street, Ste. 3 Dania Beach, FL 33004 Ann: Eric N. Assouline, Esq. ena@assoulineberlowe.corn (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Steven J. Reisman, Esq. CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178 1 E-mail: sreisman (Via Email and + +Turner P. CURTIS COLT 101 New Yo E-mail: tsinith@curtis.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail) -PREVOST, LLP ue NY 10178-0061 + +Maryann Gallagher, Esq. CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 Park Avenue + +#### SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +New York, NY 10178-0061 E-mail: maallaeher@cunis.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail) + +ILEANA CRUZ BONGINI, ESQ. icruz@stearnsweave STEARNS WEAVER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. Coquina Investments Museum Tower, Suite 2200 150 West Flagler Street Miami, Florida 33130 (VIA CM/ECF an + +Maynard G ollin@ LP wer ell Avenue 33131 CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Paul J. McMahon, Esq. Paul McMahon, P.A. 2840 S.W. Third Ave Miami, Florida 33129 pjm@pjmlawmiami.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Robert P. Avolio, Esq. Crossroads Corporate Center 3150 Brunswick Pike, Ste. 120 Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 ravolio@avoliohanlon.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail) + +Mark S. Shipman, Esq. 20 Batterson Park Road, Suite 120 Farmington, CT 06032 mark @shiriso.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail) + +#### -SERVICE LIST CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR + +Heather L Ries, Esq. Fox Rothschild, LLP 222 Lakeview Ave, Suite 700 West Palm Beach, Fl 33401 hries@foxrothschild.cum (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Geoffrey S. Aaronson, Esq., Geoffrey S. Aaronson, P.A., Local Counsel for FEP and the FEP Victims Group, Miami Tower. 100 SE 2nd Street, 27th Floor, Miami, Florida 33131 gaaronson@aaronsonpa.com (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) + +Michael Paris, Esq. William C. Nystrom, Esq. Nystrom, Beckman & Paris, LLP Lead Counsel for FEP and the FEP Victims Group 10 Saint James Avenue, 16th Floor Boston,. 02116 moaris@nboaris.com wnvstrom@nboaris.com (Via Email and U.S. Mail) + +Scott L. Baena, Esq. Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price 1450 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2 Miami, FL 33131-3238 c i SBaena@bilzin.com (VIA CM/ECF? Mt +0 + +s Co \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4103a00bb55282079e707f0a19c8c35c47adbbbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191/EFTA02769191.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1257 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769191.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 25460, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 332.029, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 332.029, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT TO HIS RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.913999999999994, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 532.339, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 532.339, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 61.913999999999994, + 389.61 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.306, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 527.3100000000001 + ], + [ + 379.375, + 541.08 + ], + [ + 217.306, + 541.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. INTRODUCTION.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 213.44631958007812, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 213.44631958007812, + 415.22406005859375 + ], + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 415.22406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nFORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION \nwww.tlsb.uscourts.gov", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.489, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 412.0303955078125, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 412.0303955078125, + 141.570556640625 + ], + [ + 198.489, + 141.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO FIX AND COMPEL PAYMENT BY QTASK OF \nATTORNEYS FEES AND SANCTIONS FOR ITS CONTEMPT OF COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.50899999999999, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 495.24603271484375, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 495.24603271484375, + 285.4740905761719 + ], + [ + 113.50899999999999, + 285.4740905761719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE EXPERT REPORT PROVES OTASK'S NONCOMPLIANCE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.338, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 453.8220520019531, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 453.8220520019531, + 207.09405517578125 + ], + [ + 81.338, + 207.09405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Has Not Complied with the Subpoena [D.E. 095] \nor the March 8, 2010 Order ID.E. #411 k", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.742, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 457.5022888183594, + 243.81 + ], + [ + 457.5022888183594, + 271.59405517578125 + ], + [ + 185.742, + 271.59405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask's Productions to Date Rave Not Complied \nwith the Subpoena or the March 8, 2010 Order:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.31399999999996, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 422.3231506347656, + 370.17 + ], + [ + 422.3231506347656, + 398.72406005859375 + ], + [ + 183.31399999999996, + 398.72406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Has Prevented Compliance with the Subpoena \nby Blockina the Trustee's Access to the Shadowbox:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.777, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 449.7130432128906, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 449.7130432128906, + 587.7240600585938 + ], + [ + 188.777, + 587.7240600585938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask has Prevented the Trustee from Understanding the \nUniverse of Data Available so the Trustee can Narrow its Search:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.069, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 482.29083251953125, + 138.51 + ], + [ + 482.29083251953125, + 166.97906494140625 + ], + [ + 162.069, + 166.97906494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Court Has AlrekProvided a Proper \nMechanism to Protect Individual Users' Rights:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.524, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 439.0595397949219, + 363.69 + ], + [ + 439.0595397949219, + 391.97906494140625 + ], + [ + 201.524, + 391.97906494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Can Monitor the Trustee's Investigation through the Shadowbox:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 134.754, + 616.41 + ], + [ + 489.66455078125, + 616.41 + ], + [ + 489.66455078125, + 630.8490600585938 + ], + [ + 134.754, + 630.8490600585938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Has Stopped Even Attempting to Comply \nWith the Trustee's Requests for Information from \u00b0task:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.37599999999998, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 463.1817932128906, + 188.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 463.1817932128906, + 216.84906005859375 + ], + [ + 179.37599999999998, + 216.84906005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Has Used Wrongfully Assertions of 3rd\nParties' Rights to Obstruct the Trustee's Investigation:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.618, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 454.6610412597656, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 454.6610412597656, + 404.445556640625 + ], + [ + 183.618, + 404.445556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Qtask Has Wrongfully Obstructed the Trustee's Investigation \nby Attempting to Filter the Trustee's Requests for Data:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.96, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 474.23199462890625, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 474.23199462890625, + 142.70556640625 + ], + [ + 169.96, + 142.70556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Otask Cannot be Permitted to Control the Production Process:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.929, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 458.5973815917969, + 277.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 458.5973815917969, + 293.0755615234375 + ], + [ + 149.929, + 293.0755615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. THE TRUSTEE REOUESTS SWIF'fC RT RESOLUTION.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 376.1218566894531 + ], + [ + 428.29254150390625, + 376.1218566894531 + ], + [ + 428.29254150390625, + 395.98907470703125 + ], + [ + 80.12400000000001, + 395.98907470703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.625, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 383.3756408691406, + 102.06 + ], + [ + 383.3756408691406, + 116.45556640625 + ], + [ + 227.625, + 116.45556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.197, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 384.4014892578125, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 384.4014892578125, + 85.3585205078125 + ], + [ + 225.197, + 85.3585205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.625, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 385.40240478515625, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 385.40240478515625, + 85.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 227.625, + 85.8170166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.197, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 383.6514892578125, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 383.6514892578125, + 85.353515625 + ], + [ + 225.197, + 85.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.983, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.021484375, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.021484375, + 85.353515625 + ], + [ + 223.983, + 85.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASE NO. \nSERVICE LIST \n: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.80399999999997, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 385.40240478515625, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 385.40240478515625, + 84.68701171875 + ], + [ + 225.80399999999997, + 84.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.197, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.63909912109375, + 54.269999999999996 + ], + [ + 383.63909912109375, + 84.228515625 + ], + [ + 225.197, + 84.228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "-SERVICE LIST \nCASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.61399999999998, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 382.521484375, + 55.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 382.521484375, + 85.353515625 + ], + [ + 223.61399999999998, + 85.353515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 154 + ], + [ + "Line", + 77 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 169 + ], + [ + "Line", + 82 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 170 + ], + [ + "Line", + 84 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 83 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 85 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 175 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769191" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1428da4e6d884c837492562197aea0b96adbaf10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, +v. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN:** +**MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT** + +Defendants. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Plaintiff or Epstein"), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion to Amend the Complaint in part for the reasons set forth below: + +1. 1. On or about December 7, 2009, the Plaintiff filed his action in this matter. +2. 2. It is the essence of the Plaintiff's action that the Defendants used actual lawsuits against Epstein or fabricated others to market investments to third parties for a return of investment on the Epstein cases. +3. 3. Is not the intention or position of the Plaintiff to put into issue whether or not the actions alleged against Epstein by various plaintiffs are true or not. Instead, the essence of the complaint is to focus on the alleged misconduct of filing legal motions and other actions in pursuit of civil litigation unrelated to the merits or value of the cases brought against the Plaintiff. More specifically, *See* the allegations contained on page 2 of the complaint, paragraphs 10, 21, 25, 26, 31-41. + +paragraphs: 4. While the Plaintiff believes his complaint is clear, in an abundance of caution so as to remove any doubt as to whether the Plaintiff has put into issue his alleged responsibility for the claims brought against him, the Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint to eliminattfollowing + +- A. 42(e); +- B. 42(h); +- C. 46; +- D. 51; +- E. 52; +- F. 67(c); + +O + +rrn\_ + +5. The Plaintiff respectfullythbrnits that additional amendments will be necessary once the records subpoenaed from the trustee have been received and depositions occur relating to those records. However, ht is ame t is requested at this time for the purpose of clearing up any alleged misapprehension, titalrilte Plaintiff has placed in issue his alleged actual liability in the cases brought against hi tem, Rosenfeldt & Adler. + +6. The undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for theepurpose of delay. + +7. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has and will continue to attempt to resolve this matter without the need of a hearing. + +,C + +T + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. Case No. 502009CA0408003OOOOABAG Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this -CfJanuary, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & S for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Bea S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein One 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. ttomcys 09 and Marc roward Blvd., Ste + +rcS + +m ill W:\807431EWteins Mown to Amend Complaint' 1 /5/1 1-14:591 + +Respectfully + +L. Ackerman, Jr. No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. 901 Point, West Tower 777 South Flager Drive West Palm Beach, FL Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22df913863fdf760d79634cd1ba7f72d9faaa95b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208/EFTA02769208.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769208.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3237, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.486, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.976, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 542.976, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 291.486, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 384.01812744140625, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 384.01812744140625, + 168.48748779296875 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 168.48748779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769208" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..921594fafb5776348365a9ebb4946f20aa9e9529 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA +GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +CASE NO. +502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually and and L.M., +individually, + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +REQUEST FOR COPIES TO +[REDACTED] NOTICE OF +PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY +DATED DECEMBER 14, 2010** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned representatives and pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.351(e), hereby request(s) Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], to furnish a legible copy of each and every item or record produced pursuant to his Notice of Production from Non-Party bearing certificate of service dated December 14, 2010 of the following party subpoenaed: + +1. 1. Records Custodian, + Wackenhut Corporation + 4200 Wackenhut Drive, Suite 100 + Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-4242 + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 4/1/11 +day of January, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Epstein's RFC to [REDACTED] NPNP 12-14 Wackenhut + +Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney +Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL +33409. + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..811ba73dd3f9f07a5e3b682c9acb337dae93e038 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211/EFTA02769211.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769211.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1651, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 329.664, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 536.916, + 40.5 + ], + [ + 536.916, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 329.664, + 106.11000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769211" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2674a0ae633e39c6e20b65f337430e27ce79664d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120 I + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXX x MB AG + +## NOTICE OF TAKING DEP49 + +r + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi -StNn or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: erb Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. + +Place: Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral efilliati6n before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or ah other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 4th + +day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +'st oseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +WHITE ETT P.A. Espirito Sant Floor 1395 Brie v e Miami, 131-3302 Tele Oast 05) 789-9200 F 'mil 05) 789-9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f56ac3589b97c1f3c2f7f84109227dde4342bcc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213/EFTA02769213.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769213.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1645, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.452, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 524.7959999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 524.7959999999999, + 128.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 328.452, + 128.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEP49", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.738, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 396.324, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 396.324, + 335.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 195.738, + 335.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769213" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0482c3656678f76f6fad3de75eb3007c91c2f11e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.md @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED + +11 JAN - 7 PM 4:55 +SOURCE R. BOCK, CLERK +OF BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION** + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys cancel the deposition of: + +**NAME AND ADDRESS** + +Robert D. Critton + +**DATE AND TIME** + +January 10, 2011 +10:00 a.m. + +**LOCATION** + +Searcy Denney, et al +Annex Bldg., Suite 100 +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bl. +West Palm Beach, FL + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. ██████ to all Counsel on the attached list, this \_\_\_\_\_ day of January, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for ██████ J. ██████ + +cc: Signature Court Reporting + +Epstein v. [REDACTED], et al +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Cancellation of Deposition: Robert D. Critton +Page 2 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, +[REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fcd08e5fc12c52f02723f9143677169c639e6de --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215/EFTA02769215.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769215.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2063, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.532, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.43299999999994, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 436.43299999999994, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 167.532, + 320.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 202.13099999999997, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 202.13099999999997, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 409.04999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.83899999999997, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 328.387, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 328.387, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 228.83899999999997, + 409.04999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 383.01699999999994, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 452.822, + 396.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 452.822, + 409.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 383.01699999999994, + 409.04999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.96800000000002, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 348.99199999999996, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 348.99199999999996, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.96800000000002, + 208.17000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 43 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769215" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bb01c9292337eae781944ca12b40c9392291a52 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. I I, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION` - rm COURT ROORTER + +s- + +c + +XW 4:21 + +al• + +c0-7, + +or' fS3 . • + +m + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned 4%), or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +Upon oral e mi S \*o before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other n tc or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral exam' tion will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th day + +% ednesday, January 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +ten + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]()cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..740edc9afd86d4c91a8eadbc0030b73d44d1371c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217/EFTA02769217.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769217.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1725, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.89000000000004, + 79.515 + ], + [ + 547.2210693359375, + 79.515 + ], + [ + 547.2210693359375, + 137.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 349.89000000000004, + 137.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769217" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cafa623affc4cf91505c453af023b0e602be69ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: [REDACTED] Adler + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th day + +of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9840487f312224855f6ffc00301484c44fb0d038 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219/EFTA02769219.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769219.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1807, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.89000000000004, + 98.04600000000002 + ], + [ + 534.786, + 98.04600000000002 + ], + [ + 534.786, + 150.00199999999998 + ], + [ + 349.89000000000004, + 150.00199999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.658, + 331.848 + ], + [ + 538.638, + 331.848 + ], + [ + 538.638, + 346.094 + ], + [ + 95.658, + 346.094 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 120 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769219" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce5173f83c9b53046b69a75a6aaabc876e28444e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th + +day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..012ab0b1076b8051a2dd7ccb823ca31f4f06b860 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221/EFTA02769221.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769221.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1952, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 534.144, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 534.144, + 150.84 + ], + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 150.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.436, + 333.524 + ], + [ + 537.996, + 333.524 + ], + [ + 537.996, + 347.77 + ], + [ + 101.436, + 347.77 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769221" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf0b74f99dde340b40fe1b7d3fed05a47a94177f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Scott Rothstein + +Date and Time: Friday, January 21, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: Location to be determined. + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and + +![](_page_0_Picture_168.jpeg) + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward +Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]()cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c726740963c2fb2f40bacdede4521d59915f4e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/EFTA02769223.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1695, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.4, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_168.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 346.68000000000006, + 99.12 + ], + [ + 532.86, + 99.12 + ], + [ + 532.86, + 152.04 + ], + [ + 346.68000000000006, + 152.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.942, + 333.48 + ], + [ + 537.354, + 333.48 + ], + [ + 537.354, + 347.76 + ], + [ + 96.942, + 347.76 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769223" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/_page_0_Picture_168.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/_page_0_Picture_168.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4525fd05e311ea67ffcfb70ccf64494335616ed0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769223/_page_0_Picture_168.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0525948560ca4483aa840eda12d36e1225e77751db5fd66e6db09ab04dcd9f2a +size 1256 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f53c4c19be2237f7916d846936c8a34ddc99c416 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +**Plaintiff,** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +v. + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED: +11 JAN 11 AM 9:00 +CIRCUIT COUNTY +R. BOCK +BEACH COUNTY +ST. LEX +CIVIL COUNTY + +**CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +**Name: Ken Jenne** +**Date and Time: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.** +**Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394** + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th day + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, 1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33 Telephone Number (95 15 Facsimile Number (954) 511 ivv(unitedreport + ++6s + +Respectfully submitted, + +oseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +TT P.A. Espirito San Floor 1395 Bric Miami 31-3302 Tel 305) 789-9200 05) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7ccbacab3c1af118936d8c4b86484e591f681f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225/EFTA02769225.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769225.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1963, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 346.68000000000006, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.5759999999999, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.5759999999999, + 150.84 + ], + [ + 346.68000000000006, + 150.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.51, + 335.2 + ], + [ + 536.0699999999999, + 335.2 + ], + [ + 536.0699999999999, + 347.77 + ], + [ + 99.51, + 347.77 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769225" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a34805e6421189a70109d1441381dfb80609874c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually, J. + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXIVIB AG + +> + +x... m + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION CIE COUlfREP8RTER . Coa Ac e,/ + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersig take the deposition of: C y or an attomerorthe firm will- + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +% ednesday, January 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3" Ave., 21" Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral ex before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other not r officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral exam' non will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6thday of December, 2010 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivv@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivv@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7cedd476a1d5e813306a636018970249f0c7e4d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227/EFTA02769227.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769227.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1882, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 79.61 + ], + [ + 546.4743041992188, + 79.61 + ], + [ + 546.4743041992188, + 136.603515625 + ], + [ + 349.24800000000005, + 136.603515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769227" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2ac581fc0c7388e9bb4df38e2b8ba98be3962fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Debra [REDACTED] + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +[REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 6th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df8a0a8c81063c87a4cb4341dcc08f70a1ea811f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229/EFTA02769229.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769229.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1940, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 345.396, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.5759999999999, + 98.88399999999999 + ], + [ + 531.5759999999999, + 150.84 + ], + [ + 345.396, + 150.84 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION AS TO THE COURT REPORTER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.3, + 335.2 + ], + [ + 536.0699999999999, + 335.2 + ], + [ + 536.0699999999999, + 348.60799999999995 + ], + [ + 96.3, + 348.60799999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769229" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7474f6f576d24b6f60c36c6ccd4529131112937 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +XXXX MB + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] +MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT + +2011 JAN 11 PM 3:33 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIVIL DIVISION + +FILED + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion for Summary Judgment in regard to the claims brought by the Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. The Court, after carefully considering the arguments of the attorneys, after examining all pertinent pleadings, affidavits and other matters of record in regard to the Motion makes the following findings and legal rulings. + +Upon Motion for Summary Judgment, the movant has the burden of conclusively demonstrating the non-existence of any genuine issue of material fact. *Holl v. Talcott*, 191 So.2d 40, 43 (Fla. 1966). The burden of demonstrating the existence of genuine issues does not shift to the opposing party until the movant has successfully met its burden. *Sasson v. Rockwell Mfg. Co.*, 715 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998). When considering a Motion for Summary Judgment, it is settled that a trial court is not permitted to weigh material conflicting evidence or pass upon the credibility of the witnesses. *Id.* at 1067. Further, the Court must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom a Summary Judgment is sought. [REDACTED] *v. B & B Cash Grocery Stores*, 692 So.2d 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). If the record raises *even the slightest doubt that* + +FSBO, 703 So.2d 1101 (Ha. 2nd DCA 1997). It hardly needs to be repeated that Summary Judgment cannot be granted if there is the slightest doubt about the presence o y issue of fact. See e.g., Fleet Finance & Mortgage, Inc. v. Carey, 707 So.2d 9 4\Tyl . mDCA 1998). an issue might exist, Summary Judgment is precluded. Fatherly v. California Federal Bank, + +Moreover, it is also axiomatic that Summary Jud ent i premature prior to Based upon the record evidence, this Court's prior Orders, as well as rec s f ich this Court has taken judicial notice, Summary Judgment is premat a i point. Through no fault of his own, the Plaintiff has not been able to obi which clearly are calculated to lead to admissible evidence in this case. W not and will never show any e o support the Plaintiffs claim, it would be manifestly unfair and error f r ihi ourt to rule upon the Motion prior to the Plaintiff having an opportunity have access to those records. Moreover, there are numerous pending issues in gaz to work product, privilege, both as to the Plaintiff and the Defendant, ecords which are now in the custody of the trustee in bankruptcy. the facts being crystallized and discovery being comp c eesosi ) efendant contends that those records do + +fore, after careful consideration and examination of the record, and given the foresaid authority, Summary Judgment in this matter is ti therefore, the Motion is denied at this time. + +DONE AND ORDERED this j1 'day t Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +*Epstein v. Rothstein, et al.* +Case No. 502009CA040800 AG +Order +Page 3 + +Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +██████ L. ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE, 901 ██████ Point West, 777 S. Flagler Dr., West Palm Beach, +FL 33401 + +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73114a4444bc3f0ba349d654f1bf7fb119dbabab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231/EFTA02769231.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769231.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3521, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.520999999999994, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 491.67, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 491.67, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 62.520999999999994, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.02599999999998, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 401.227, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 401.227, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 193.02599999999998, + 311.04 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769231" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb4a820c6b385f07d7557cc4a2fbfb81b237d187 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** +(Cancels Notice for February 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at +Request Eric Raymond, Esq. counsel for [REDACTED] Kretschmar) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will +take the deposition of: + +Name: [REDACTED] Kretschmar + +Date and Time: Friday, February 11, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral examination before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any +other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The +oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken +for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted +under the rules of the Court. + +Epstein v Rothstein, Case No. 50 2009CA0408=XXMB AG Re-NTD Kretschmar + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this g th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 3340Q and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One tal;Z.,ro od Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Re mg, Inc. 1218 S.E. Avenu Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone Ntunker (954) 523-0915 Facsimile b r (954) 525-0511 ivv@tirdtd e rting.net + +Respectfully submitted, + +JfSseph L. A Fla. Bar r. + +0 + +FO ITE BURNETT P.A. rito nto Plaza, 14' Floor 95 Brickell Avenue ami, Florida 33131-3302 lephone: (305) 789-9200 acsimile: (305) 789-9201 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e31173d7059d32045390894850b10bb008d2d76 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234/EFTA02769234.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769234.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2019, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 331.482, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 331.482, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION (Cancels Notice for February 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at Request Eric Raymond, Esq. counsel for [REDACTED] Kretschmar)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.228, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 453.28799999999995, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 453.28799999999995, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 144.228, + 362.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769234" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75b860809fef92423f090952fb56e3434d2e4d7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and individually, + +De fendant(s). + +![](_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg) + +## IN TILE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +fl + +## MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION + +Defendant, J. EDWARDS (EDWARDS), moves this Honorable Court to reconsider its Order on Defendant, , Motion for Summary Judgment in which this Court has denied the Defendant's "potion as premature pending completion of discovery. However, the Order fails to address the Defendant's primary argument as to which the status of discovery is irrelevant: t ord-shield doctrine." The Plaintiff cannot seek affirmative relief while simultaneogusly asserting privileges that preclude the Defendant from obtaining relevant and material mforrnation. articulateankviable theory of damages--again a defect as to which the status of discovery is irrelevant. The Court's Order also fails to address the Plaintiff's total inability to + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, respectfully requests that this Court reconsider and grant his Motion for Summary Judgment on one or both of the grounds stated. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Reconsideration + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, thi day of Jan 2011. + +> Jack Flor r No.: 169440 S enney Scarola B Shipley 21 1 Palm Beach Lak d West Palm Beach, F Phone: (561) 68 Fax: (5 Attorney f , Esq. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion for Reconsideration + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 727-2423 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e288e48a6e1040358789b95b3eb7a422c9969040 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/EFTA02769236.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2462, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.74, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN TILE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 529.83, + 113.988037109375 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 113.988037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.143, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 406.0633239746094, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 406.0633239746094, + 361.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 199.143, + 361.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 347.739, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 347.739, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 254.56199999999998, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769236" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04799799c07f8c29a891d501a8387f48bb6fbbe5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:175a78b5f9dfc7fee24503844f17d7998388140d999d73e98f5e70ccab278dca +size 10207 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f46b08c03c366ccf38cec983886342db3157c1e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +". r --)ns) -0 tin t? + +## MOTION FOR ORDER TO TAKE SCOTT ROTH TELN'S DEPOSITIONS .fl + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through and t unsel, hereby files his Motion for Order to take the deposition of Defendant, SCOTrRQ EIN (herein after "ROTHSTEIN") and states as grounds the following: + +- 1. Plaintiff is seeking to tak \_4position of SCOTT ROTHSTEIN in the abovestyled litigation. +- 2. ROTHSTEIN is alharty'to this matter and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to take his deposition in accordance wi e 1.310 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures. +- 3. To a owledge of the Plaintiff, ROTHSTEIN is currently incarcerated within the U.S. Depart tice Federal Bureau of Prisons and in protective custody. The Federal Bureau of Prisons requires an Order entered by this Court to allow Plaintiff to take the deposition of ROTHSTEIN at the location where he is currently incarcerated. +- 5. Plaintiff believes that ROTHSTEIN has specific information that is crucial to the prosecution of his case. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court enter an Order granting Plaintiff's + +Epstein v Rothstein and Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's M/for Order to Take Scott Rothstein's Deposition + +Motion for Order to Take SCOTT ROTI-ISTEIN's deposition in accordance with Rule 1.310 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & S meys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beac Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstei Lauderdale, FL 33301. A-11" this Fr day and Marc S. Nurik, Law roward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort + +> R ACe\ c i eSkil submitted, + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +> Mi.oint, West Tower BURNETT P.A. 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8226e50c01853a3907c189f8e6eae84470bce26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239/EFTA02769239.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769239.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2198, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.06199999999995, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 539.34, + 68.85000000000001 + ], + [ + 539.34, + 112.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 289.06199999999995, + 112.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ORDER TO TAKE SCOTT ROTH TELN'S DEPOSITIONS .fl", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.202, + 290.6015625 + ], + [ + 525.66650390625, + 290.6015625 + ], + [ + 525.66650390625, + 311.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 101.202, + 311.2330627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.34199999999998, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 381.36810302734375, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 381.36810302734375, + 224.613037109375 + ], + [ + 216.34199999999998, + 224.613037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769239" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9fd9e0f63596922bdf7250247c76c23bdffdded --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOaMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +E. O n c -t) < - "arcri; tn• • + +## MOTION FOR ORDER TO TAKE SCOTT ROTIFISTEIN'S DEP ION,) + +-n F + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, herebyfiM hiMotion for Order to take the deposition of Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN (herein after "ROTHSTEIN") and states as grounds the following: + +- 1. Plaintiff is seeking to take the deposition of SCOTT ROTHSTEIN in the abovestyled litigation. +- 2. ROTHSTEIN is a party to this matter and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to take his deposition in accordance With Rule 1.310 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures. +- 3. To the lcnowledge of the Plaintiff, ROTHSTEIN is currently incarcerated within the U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons and in protective custody. 4 The Federal Bureau of Prisons requires an Order entered by this Court to allow Plaintiff to take the deposition of ROTHSTEIN at the location where he is currently incarcerated. +- 5. Plaintiff believes that ROTHSTEIN has specific information that is crucial to the prosecution of his case. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court enter an Order granting Plaintiff's + +Epstein v Rothstein and Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXISAG Epstein's M/for Order to Take Scott Rothstein's Deposition + +Motion for Order to Take SCOTT ROTHSTE1N's deposition in accordance with Rule 1.310 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE aster + +1 /141" I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing w led this \_la day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J.a 2139 Palm Beach LakesBoulevaml, West Palm Beac FL 33409 and Mare S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothste' Froward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +submitted, + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +> BURNETT P.A. 901 Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32a8a7fc3a689277686ab414738e047209587540 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241/EFTA02769241.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769241.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2270, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.698, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 526.9627075195312, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 526.9627075195312, + 128.853515625 + ], + [ + 292.698, + 128.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ORDER TO TAKE SCOTT ROTIFISTEIN'S DEP ION,)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.352, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 496.0276794433594, + 301.32 + ], + [ + 496.0276794433594, + 316.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 116.352, + 316.7335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE aster", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.85000610351562, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 459.40411376953125, + 217.89000000000004 + ], + [ + 459.40411376953125, + 235.728515625 + ], + [ + 226.85000610351562, + 235.728515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769241" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..262246349af44a0ec6b9524a0f878397565c6e75 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +*File original & +return date +stamped copy +1th attached +envelope* + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: Thursday, January 27, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: David F. [REDACTED] + +PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway WPB, REL + +ROOM #: 9C + +FILED +11 JAN 20 PM 3:51 +STANDARD K. BOGA, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL ROJ + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Epstein's Motion for Order to Take Defendant, Scott Rothstein's Deposition + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Krista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355 4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was coo ted with counsel and faxed and mailed this clay of January, 2011 to: Jack Scarol Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 213 each Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, of Marc S. Nurik, erdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully + +erman, Jr. o. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +[ml) WAII0743\NOH on Epstein's Motion lot Order Take Rothstein's Depot1/18/11•17:3) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7cd64275eab956128cb3206c150f5ed2d7a032f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243/EFTA02769243.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769243.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2130, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.99399999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 526.269, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 526.269, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 328.99399999999997, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.088, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 362.986, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 362.986, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 233.088, + 319.14000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 60.093, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 270.722, + 525.69 + ], + [ + 270.722, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 60.093, + 539.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.736, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 381.4211730957031, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 381.4211730957031, + 175.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 215.736, + 175.98248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769243" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1762ad8ea49166a63891ede92313766daa1399c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +## IN HE CIRCUIT COURT OF E F ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCO, , IN AND FO: PALM BEACH COUNTY, LORIDA + +CA E NO.: 502009CA040800 XXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant, + +## MOTION TO EXPAND IN ES + +Defendant, J. by and thr Honorable Court pursuant to the provisions of R increase the number of initial intenogaton additional sixteen (16) expert interro this motion, Defendant would s dersigned counse i moves this \' a , Florida Rules of Civil ocedure, to herein so as to allow for the filing of and ance with those attached, and in support of + +- action. +- 1. The Supre e Cou as not approve a form of interrogatories fo this type of +- 2. ele nts of the claims asserted a d the nature and complexity f the factual circumstanc g rise to the claims are not susce• ible to being adequately cove twenty-five 5) interrogatory limit. +- 3. The elements of defenses asserted or e petted to be asserted are not Susceptible to within the being adequately covered within the twenty-five (25) nterrogatory limit. + +Pi .r.. te c' t-- 1 -n m r + +4. The use of written interrogatories is the least burdensome, least expensive and most expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant by which to obtain necessary information and narrow trial issues. + +5. The Plaintiff will not be prejudiced through the granting of this motion. + +6. The foregoing factors and others to be presented upon hearing of this Motion constitute good cause for increasing the number of interrogatories permitted herein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 21st day of JANUARY, 2011. + +![]() + +--- + +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Defendant + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Defendant's Motion to Expand Interrogatories +Page 3 of 3 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +![]()Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50a5a7f2a04208af2f33c27b0991c7dc7094adb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245/EFTA02769245.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769245.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2442, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN HE CIRCUIT COURT OF E \nF ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCO, , IN AND \nFO: PALM BEACH COUNTY, LORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.0, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.2709350585938, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.2709350585938, + 116.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 304.0, + 116.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO EXPAND IN \nES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.10399999999998, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 427.75665283203125, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 427.75665283203125, + 323.74249267578125 + ], + [ + 175.10399999999998, + 323.74249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.119, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 345.98999999999995, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 345.98999999999995, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 253.119, + 144.99 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769245" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9296f473242985796cfd64f7a836f3f8ca0a203 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +Name: Russell Adler + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed +this 19 day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +FILED +11 JAN 21 PH 3:12 +SHAWED IN BURNETT, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 2 + +33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96d83033a5438bd0783f5c087c28803f70c08758 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248/EFTA02769248.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769248.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1616, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.61, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 332.029, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 332.029, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.49699999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 435.219, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 435.219, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 164.49699999999999, + 334.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.73, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 398.799, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 398.799, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 236.73, + 513.54 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769248" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21409f4316d6656c5524e0ae1e747306e5c63d6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +FILED +11 JAN 21 PH 3:12 +SHANGHAI JUDICIAL CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL ? + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +Name: Herb Stettin + +Date and Time: Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 19th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c814cc1504a1da42a9e6648e00369f5857f16334 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250/EFTA02769250.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769250.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1657, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.20799999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 330.20799999999997, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.89, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.00499999999994, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.00499999999994, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 163.89, + 333.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.516, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 397.585, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 397.585, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 235.516, + 512.73 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769250" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa56b8d899616d2cc92ccd6be42bf383e259c776 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 JAN 24 PH 3:26 +FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +Name: Ken Jenne + +Date and Time: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 21 day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +FOWLER [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19f222b87684d4c7c3603a6b6a6476c2163378db --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252/EFTA02769252.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769252.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1609, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 332.088, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 332.088, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.832, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 435.108, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 435.108, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 164.832, + 334.53 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.946, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 398.748, + 499.77 + ], + [ + 398.748, + 513.54 + ], + [ + 236.946, + 513.54 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769252" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e174dd00ee759aa65ef01dff7467049904322f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendants. + +MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER + +[REDACTED] S. Adler, Esquire, files this Motion for Protective Order and would state: + +1. 1. The undersigned was served with a Subpoena for Deposition in the above referenced cause of action, set for January 20, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., which was unilaterally set by [REDACTED] Ackerman. +2. 2. The undersigned is a practicing attorney in Broward County. +3. 3. This deposition was unilaterally set by Mr. Ackerman, without clearing a date with the undersigned. +4. 4. The undersigned's counsel, Fred Haddad, will be out of State until February 2011. +5. 5. The undersigned has called and emailed Mr. Ackerman with regard to resetting the deposition, at a time and date mutually convenient for the undersigned as well as his counsel. +6. 6. Mr. Ackerman has not responded and ignored the undersigned's telephone calls and emails to him. + +WHEREFORE, the undersigned prays that this Honorable Court enter an Order granting his Motion for Protective Order and such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. + +FILED + +11 JAN 24 PM 2:07 + +JAMES R. BOGH, +CIRCUIT COUNSEL +CIRCUIT COURT + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of foregoing has been furnished by \_\_\_\_\_ U.S. Mail; \_\_\_\_\_ Fax; \_\_\_\_\_ E-Mail on this \_\_\_\_\_ day of January, 2011, to: + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esquire +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S. Flagler Street +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Mark Nurik, Esquire +One E. Broward Blvd. - Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()By: + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e305b3492001b1b18ddf3283d50743cd2c4fbb54 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254/EFTA02769254.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769254.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1822, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.358, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 489.63599999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 489.63599999999997, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 281.358, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.18800000000002, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 400.113, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 400.113, + 292.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 202.18800000000002, + 292.40999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.8, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 395.157, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 395.157, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 242.8, + 86.67 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769254" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47b589b46872d592ec3c0fbf70ecdf4f8d9c3bd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY notified that the undersigned will call up for hearing the following matter: + +DATE: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2011 +TIME: 8:45 A.M. +JUDGE: DAVID F. [REDACTED] +ROOM: 9C +PLACE: PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE +205 North Dixie Highway +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +SPECIFIC MATTER TO BE HEARD: + +**Russell S. Adler's Motion for Protective Order** + +*Movant counsel certifies that a bona fide effort to agree or to narrow the issues of the motion noticed has been made with opposing counsel or that because of time considerations, such effort has not yet been made but will be made prior to the scheduled hearing.* + +FILED +11 JAN 24 PM 2 07 +BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL SUIT + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail; Fax; E-Mail on this day of January, 2011, to: + +Jack Scarola, Esquire 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +L. Ackerman,Esquire 901 Point West 777 S. Flagler Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Mark Nurik, Esquire One E. Broward Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33 - Suite 700 301 + +Copies furnished to: Judee Judicial Assistant O4 + +4 SELL 9c S. ADLER, P.A. 1 East Las Olas Boulevard 4,Suite 1400 Fort Laude e, FL 33301 lel: (954) 8 -8200 Facsimile: ( 54) 208-0500 Email: adl \*urytrial.com + +By: + +S. ADLER, ESQUI ORIDA BAR NO.: 599298 tE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36090652205c94786ddec086fe8dc6b93f6af01f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256/EFTA02769256.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769256.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1582, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.46, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.041, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 489.849, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 489.849, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 281.041, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.765, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 362.37899999999996, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 362.37899999999996, + 293.21999999999997 + ], + [ + 239.765, + 293.21999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Russell S. Adler's Motion for Protective Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.777, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 412.76, + 476.28 + ], + [ + 412.76, + 488.43 + ], + [ + 188.777, + 488.43 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.209, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 397.7854309082031, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 397.7854309082031, + 128.35748291015625 + ], + [ + 244.209, + 128.35748291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769256" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..322b3ad3b24d82afbf6dc8f512ddf51835a3dea3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.md @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +State of Florida + +County of PALM BEACH + +Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG Court Date: 1/20/2011 2:00 pm + +Plaintiff: + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +vs. + +Defendant: + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, ET AL** + +For: + +**[REDACTED] L. Ackerman** +**[REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A.** + +Received by COMPASS INVESTIGATIONS on the 4th day of January, 2011 at 9:55 am to be served on **HERBERT STETTIN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT & ADLER, PA, 5401 HAMMOCK DRIVE, CORAL GABLES, FL 33156.** + +I, Rebeca Duharte, do hereby affirm that on the 4th day of January, 2011 at 8:45 pm, I: + +**INDIVIDUALLY/PERSONALLY** served by delivering a true copy of the **SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION** with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: **HERBERT STETTIN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT & ADLER, PA** at the address of: **5401 HAMMOCK DRIVE, CORAL GABLES, FL 33156,** and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes. + +Description of Person Served: Age: 70s, Sex: M, Race/Skin Color: **[REDACTED]** Height: 5.9, Weight: 180, Hair: Gray, Glasses: Y + +I certify that I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the judicial circuit in which the process was served. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing document and that the facts stated in it are true. + +No Notary Required pursuant to F.S. 92.525(2). + + FILED + 11 JAN 24 07 + JAN R. BORRE + HEBEACH, GA + CIRCUIT COURT + CLERK + FL + + +NOTARY CLERK + +Rebeca Duharte + CPS #517 + +**COMPASS INVESTIGATIONS** + 10 South New River Drive, East + Suite 205 + Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + (954) 527-5722 + Cur Job Serial Number: 2011000048 + Ref: 80743 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, arid L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +### IN T JUDI BEA CIRCUIT COURT OF TH FIFTEENTH IAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM H COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Com lex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. ..1201 + +Case o. 50 2009CA040800 AG + +RECD ON :. SERVED • DATE SERVED BY •floaEl\_ + +### UBPOENA FOR DEPOSI i ON DUCES TECU + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Herbert Stettia, Trustee in Bankruptcy for R c/o Charles Lichtman Berger =man, PA 200 S. Biscane Blvd., Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33131 C thstein giv dt & Adler, P 4) + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to depositions at the law offices of Avenue, 2 l g Floor, F rt Laude for the taking of your deposition 111 following: ite a person authorized bjr law to take ett, P.A., One Financial PI 100 S.E. 94 o t e 20th day of January, 2011 at 2:00 p.m., an • to have with you at that tim4 and place the + +# 4e Attached Sc edule "A" + +If you fail to ppe may be in contem of court. + +You are sub naed to appear by the foll subpoena by this y or the court, you shall attorney, and unless ex from this nd to this subpoena as direc + +2011. + +L. Ackerman Jr., Esq. &Ann sq. ett, P.A. Attorneys or Plainti , Jeffiey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +For the Court + +eph L. Ackerman, r., Lilly Ann M, E . + +1. 1. Any and all email communications by/between any attorney and/or employee of the former Rothstein law firm, including but not limited to, Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] Adler, William Berger, Michael Fisten, Ken Jenne, David Boden, Deborah [REDACTED], Andrew Barnett, [REDACTED], Richard Fandry, Christina Kitterman, Gary [REDACTED] and [REDACTED], on the one hand, and any of the following regarding Jeffrey Epstein: + 1. a) U.S. Attorney's Office; + 2. b) State of Florida Attorney's Office; + 3. c) Federal Bureau of Investigations; + 4. d) City of Palm Beach Police Department; + 5. e) Any investigator working for the State of Florida; + 6. f) Any attorney, law firm and any agent of any attorney or law firm who represented any individual with a claim against Jeffrey Epstein. + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51b3f23b875e59efdc7384b578d05cde267c8ca3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258/EFTA02769258.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769258.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3924, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 414.12, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 414.12, + 59.129999999999995 + ], + [ + 200.36100000000002, + 59.129999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN T \nJUDI \nBEA \nCIRCUIT COURT OF TH FIFTEENTH \nIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 289.062, + 33.21 + ], + [ + 537.3477172851562, + 33.21 + ], + [ + 537.3477172851562, + 77.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 289.062, + 77.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UBPOENA FOR DEPOSI i ON DUCES TECU", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.256, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 243.0 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 258.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 167.256, + 258.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4e Attached Sc \nedule \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.856, + 437.5440673828125 + ], + [ + 375.15704345703125, + 437.5440673828125 + ], + [ + 375.15704345703125, + 486.2642822265625 + ], + [ + 227.856, + 486.2642822265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.547, + 47.79 + ], + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 47.79 + ], + [ + 344.77599999999995, + 61.56 + ], + [ + 255.547, + 61.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Text", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769258" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1fc8f5d74e3019e0255e71d710eecee02a409de --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +2011 JAN 25 PM 3:50 +JHARON R. BOCK, CLAY +PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT [REDACTED] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED] Motion for Reconsideration of Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has reviewed the Motion and is fully advised in the premises. It is thereupon + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant [REDACTED] Motion for Reconsideration is hereby denied. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of January, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +DAVID F. CROW +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +Copy furnished: +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] L. ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE, 901 [REDACTED] Point West, 777 S. Flagler Dr., West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[REDACTED], JAFFE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50d74f259feee12b3060bc4118b57d8e0567bddb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261/EFTA02769261.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769261.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1330, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.4630000000001, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT [REDACTED] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.824, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 511.56, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 511.56, + 285.92999999999995 + ], + [ + 82.824, + 285.92999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769261" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0636fc91e77b0fdbb69b09aed63c791a04a9a378 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OFCANCELLATION + +S. Adler, Esquire, files this Notice of Cance scheduled on January 26, 2011 on his Motion for Protcr4 iic\*v ier and states that this hearing is connection with the hearing hereby cancelled. + +## 4 ERVICE + +-.. + +/ I HEREBY CERTIFY that U.S. Mail; Fax; t copy of foregoing has been furnished by day of January, 2011, to: + +Jack Scarola, Esquire 2139 Palm Beach Lakes West Palm Beach, 334 + +L. Ack •uire 901 omt est 777 S. Fla West h, FL 33401 + +Mark Nurik, Esquire One E. Broward Blvd. — Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +S. ADLER, P.A. 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1400 Fort Lauderd le, FL 33301 Tel: (954) 80 -8200 Facsimile: (9 ) 208-0500 Email: adl urytrial.com + +Copies furnished to: Judge Judicial Assistant By: RUS L S. ADLER, ES + +FLORIDA BAR NO.: 5 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5575d956ab5026c29e7032104582e592511d453 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262/EFTA02769262.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769262.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 982, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH\nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.79400000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 494.50800000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 494.50800000000004, + 117.112548828125 + ], + [ + 283.79400000000004, + 117.112548828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OFCANCELLATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.112, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 384.6492919921875, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 384.6492919921875, + 296.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 224.112, + 296.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4 \nERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.42700000000002, + 389.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 398.9169921875, + 389.1449890136719 + ], + [ + 398.9169921875, + 416.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 245.42700000000002, + 416.36248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769262" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07c17dfba310ffaabcf4d2390c436da104f092e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.md @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +State of Florida + +County of Palm Beach + +Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Court Date: 1/31/2011 + +Plaintiff: +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +vs. + +Defendant: + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +INDIVIDUALLY AND L.M., INDIVIDUALLY,** + +For: + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Received by Aloha Process, Inc. on the 19th day of January, 2011 at 11:40 am to be served on **THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION, 4200 WACKENHUT DRIVE 100, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410.** + +1. [REDACTED] Moussally, do hereby affirm that on the 19th day of January, 2011 at 12:10 pm, I: + +served an **AUTHORIZED** entity by delivering a true copy of the **SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION** with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: **KAREN SAVIGNAC** as **PARALEGAL** at the address of: **4200 WACKENHUT DRIVE 100, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410**, who stated they are authorized to accept service for **THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION**, and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes. + +**Description of Person Served:** Age: 50, Sex: F, Race/Skin Color: W, Height: 5 9, Weight: 170, Hair: Brn, Glasses: Y + +I certify that I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the judicial circuit in which the process was served. + +![]()[REDACTED] **Moussally** +Court Officer #997 + +**Aloha Process, Inc.** +**P.O. Box 223192** +**West Palm Beach, FL 33422** +**(561) 541-7953** + +Our Job Serial Number: ALO-2011000011 + +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +AWNA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +@#99 +5/10/11 +12:10 PM + +*Karen +Savignac* + +*prestiged +female +vice +5/1 +170 +BM +YPS* + +**SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION** + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Records Custodian +The Wackenhut Corporation +4200 Wackenhut Drive 100 +Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-4242 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409 on January 31, 2011 +and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +**Duces Tecum:** + +1. 1. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relating to all services rendered for the benefit of, or at the direction of: + - Jack Goldberger, Esq. + - Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. + - One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 + - 250 Australian Avenue + - West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5108 + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena Duces Tecum without Depostion Paget + +from January of 2009 to the present. + +- 2. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relatingf to all services rendered at: + +358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730 + +- 3. Any and all documents\* reflecting or relatir g to all services rend9ee&jor the benefit of, or at the direction of Jeffrey Epste n. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be lirr>jted to all non-i drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-re compilations from which information can be obtai e tr I copier of writings, s, and/or any other data , if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detectr ("de ces into reasonably \, "Documents" also include all electronic data. as Well metadata. All inventories and rosters\ oF—your i as application metadat usable form. and system formation technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, i r( lUding, ip /bat not limned to network drawings, lists devices (servers, PCs, laptops, WAs, cell phon.s, with data storage and/o features), programs, ata ps and security tools an protocols. of computing transmission + +These i s be inspected and may be co surrender ... ' ' al items. You may comply with the items arbe produced to the attorney whose na scheduled date of production. You may conditi payment in advance of the reasonable cost of prepa the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena time and place specified above. You have the righ ied at that time. You will not be required to this subpoena by providing legible copies of e appears on this subpoena on or before the n the preparation of the copies upon the tion. You may mail or delivel• the copies to nd thereby eliminate your appearance at the to object to the production pirsuant to this + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Subpoena Duces Tecum without Deposition +Page3 + +subpoena at any time before production by giving written notice to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena. **THIS WILL NOT BE A DEPOSITION. NO TESTIMONY WILL BE TAKEN.** + +If you fail to: + +1. 1) Appear as specified; or +2. 2) Furnish the records instead of appearing as provided above; or +3. 3) Object to this subpoena, + +You may be in contempt of court. You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED this 19th day of Jan, 2010 day of December, 2010 + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena Duces Tecum without Dcpostion Page4 + +## CERTIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM W ITHOUT DEPOSITION + +STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH + +The undersigned, as custodian of records for The Wackenhut Corpo the attached documents consisting of pages represents a true co possession, custody or control which are described in the Subpot Deposition served on me in the above styled action and identification. Production is complete and has been ces T ge is numbe ce dies that s within my um Without d by me for b e custodian of records. + +It is further certified that originals of direction, custody and control of the unders" produced are mainta under the + +The foregoing Certifica the State and County aforesaid 2O........., who: latowledpd before me, an officer duly acknowledgments, this day of authorized in + +is pe nail wn to me; or h not, take an oath, as identification; and who: + +and who eluted the foregoing certification, and who acknowledged the foregoin certification to be freely and voluntarily executed for the purposes therein recited. + +> Notary Public, State of Florida Large My Commission Expires: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab88dea07faf4ab8f93bb7993df31f62cc37c044 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264/EFTA02769264.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769264.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6639, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.202, + 27.540000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.843, + 27.540000000000006 + ], + [ + 381.843, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 230.202, + 42.92999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.03199999999998, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 451.269, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 451.269, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 151.03199999999998, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Duces Tecum:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 595.3499999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATION OF RESPONSE TO \nSUBPOENA DUCES TECUM W ITHOUT DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.25, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 454.09228515625, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 454.09228515625, + 170.22802734375 + ], + [ + 152.25, + 170.22802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769264" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97dff1eef7128e720719d573e9fc0aff8832ef4d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +**IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA** + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN,** + +**Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201** + +**Plaintiff,** + +**Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +v. + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually,** + +**Defendants.** + +11 JAN 26 PM 2:11 + +**NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +**Name: Gary Farmer** + +**Date and Time: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.** + +**Place: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394** + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 21 day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +3409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. N 1k, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. roward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. I + +Respectfu y submitte + +L. cke Jr. Fla. Bar o. 5954 + +FOWLE BURNEYC Espirito anto Plaza, 14t6 loot 1395 Bri kell Avenue Miami, orida 33131-31,02 Telepho -:(305) 789-9200 Facsimil : \ 0%)09201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. 1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone Number (954) 523 Facsimile Number (954) 5 ivv@unitedreporting.net \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d807d8398f841d6c4932310abfbc821b9ef1b864 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269/EFTA02769269.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769269.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1480, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 331.482, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.4319999999999, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.4319999999999, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 331.482, + 124.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 164.226, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 164.226, + 333.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.34, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 398.14200000000005, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 398.14200000000005, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 236.34, + 512.73 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769269" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ae6658feb428f902f11f4be43aad0ad623ceac8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +Name: + +Debra [REDACTED] + +Date and Time: + +Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: + +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed +this 24 day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +11 JAN 26 PM 2:11 + +PAGE 1 OF 1 + +33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Fla. Bar N.. 5954 + +FOWLE BURN Espirito Santo Plaza, le 14/ ?)or 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131- 02 Telephohe: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (301r789r9201 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. 1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone Number (954) 523 Facsimile Number (954) 5 ivyeunitedreporting.net \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b165fa9ef3d2336d0278ca9a4bf0247d259fbd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271/EFTA02769271.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769271.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1454, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.20799999999997, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 330.20799999999997, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.925, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 433.39799999999997, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 433.39799999999997, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 166.925, + 333.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.90900000000002, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 397.585, + 498.96 + ], + [ + 397.585, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 234.90900000000002, + 512.73 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769271" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16afa2dc2f717ee54acee380d8373fb53949a36f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF HEARING + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +DATE: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 AM + +JUDGE: Honorable David F. Crow + +PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse +205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 9-C + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Defendant, ██████████ J. ██████████ Motion to Expand Interrogatories + +Moving counsel certifies that he/she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to +resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +ROBERT R. BOCK, CLERK +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +FILED + +11 JAN 27 PM 4:36 + +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has shed by / 11-d f January, + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disa 'Mies Act, persons in need accommodation to participate in this proceeding contact the Court Administ not later than seven (7) days prior to the procee. ngs. If hearing impaired, c 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florid Relay. of a special ator's office ntact (TDD) + +I + +JA Flo 9440 Set e Scarola Shipley, P.A. Im Beach Lakes Boulevar alm Beach, Florida 33409 e: (561) 686-6300 (561)383-9451 rney for Defendant + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, +[REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-727-2423 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0896952c56a5492d5fbaf69b2fb5f987290ffa10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273/EFTA02769273.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769273.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2427, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.718, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 530.439, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 530.439, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 305.718, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.465, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 367.836, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 367.836, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 234.465, + 335.34000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.163, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 557.28 + ], + [ + 276.486, + 570.24 + ], + [ + 65.163, + 570.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.36, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 347.77599999999995, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 347.77599999999995, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 255.36, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769273" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..160914b31d6899ef84681edf5e73f081327385b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.md @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Case: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +.rC .1HT RTFillaajjavidually, I and J. individually, + +Defendants, + +FILED + +JAN 2 8 2011 + +SHARON R. B CLERK & COMP' C ) CIRCUIT CIVIL r141,:S'• + +0 + +#### MOTION FOR A STAY OF SUBPOENA PENDING RULING ON PREVIOUSLY-FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND FOR SCHEDULING QRDER ON CREATING A PRIVILEGE LOG + +Defendant, J. , Esq., pursuant to Rule 1.280(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for protection from an abusive subpoena issued by plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein through this Court and ierliecImehim and on bankruptcy trustee Herb Stettin. + +Epstein has served aL na on bp6c and Stettin that will require to review more than 70,0 ges of materials to identify responsive documents and to assert appropriate pr1vi15ges. Moreover, Epstein has contrived to have issues regarding this Court's subpoena d in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida through the haPPenStance that possession of the documents (records of a law firm) rests in the hands of Stettin. Epstein apparently contemplates that the bankruptcy court will make rulings on privilege issues that properly should be made by this Court. + +Epstein's maneuvers threaten to burden both this Court and the bankruptcy court with making duplicative, potentially conflicting, and likely unnecessary rulings. Accordingly, + +asks this Court to stay enforcement of its subpoenas for a brief period of time to permit this Court to first rule on the pending motion for summary judgment on all of Epstein's claims that have been filed by If any of Epstein's claims somehow survive the pending summary judgment motion, then this Court could rule on the proper scope of the subpoena and any privilege or other issues which remain to be litigated. proposes edule to rapidly bring these issues to resolution and urges the Court to adopt it. Edw requests a protective order, narrowing the scope of the production requests madel d requiring billionaire Epstein to pay all reasonable costs associated with reeponding to his discovery requests. + +# BACKGROUND FACTS + +As this court is well aware from a summary judgment motion filed by M, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein (a convicted sex offender) has sued legal counsel J. Esq., for conduct that occurred in the course of representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. d pursued civil lawsuits against Epstein to recover damages for Epstein's extc e pane of molestations. In retaliation and to try and intimidate and his youn ts, Epstein brought this lawsuit in this court alleging that had somehow fabricated and/or exaggerated the claims. has now filed a comprehensive motion for "summary judgment against Epstein, detailing how he is entitled to judgment on each I I, and,eyerkikte-nt Epstein's frivolous claims. + +stein has yet to file any response to comprehensive summary judgment motion. Nonetheless, he continues to harass through discovery requests connected with this case. In particular, on April 12, 2010, Epstein propounded an extremely broad Request for + +Production (RFP) to M. See Exhibit "A." Containing some 27 different requested items, the RFP seeks all sorts of electronically stored information, including a raft of internal emails between and other attorneys, paralegals, expert witnesses, investigators, and others who worked on the civil lawsuits against Epstein. On May 11, 2010, duly responded to the request for production. Through his legal counsel, noted that many ef,th4e requests Arc', sought attorney-client or work-product privileged information and others were qtly broad and unduly burdensome. See Exhibit "B." + +While was raising his objections to the subpoena lodged against him, Epstein duplicated his requests by serving a separate subpoena for thelas information. On April 16, 2010, four days after making the requests to — out waiting for his responses to the requests, much less a court ruling on obj ctio — Epstein served a subpoena duces ra :\>. 7 tecum for documents on bankruptcy court-appoint gustee, Herb Stettin. + +C N A bit of background may beihiebful here. Mr. Stettin never represented any of the underage females who had been so ually bused by Epstein. Instead, Mr. Stettin has possession of certain records related to this case — and many more entirely unrelated to this case — because he was court-appointed-4s bankruptcy trustee for the now-defunct law firm of Rothstein / Rosenfeldt Adler (RBA)! had a brief connection to RRA. For a short period of time during his representation of his young clients, was employed by RRA. It was then revealed\_thaltbe law firm president, Scott Rothstein, had been running a criminal Ponzi scheme out of the law firm. Shortly after learning of the fraud, left RRA. Later, RRA declared bankruptcy and the bankruptcy court appointed Herb Stettin trustee of the estate of RRA, charging him with handling financial claims regarding the assets of the firm. RRA's electronic + +database, including all electronically stored files and emails, were left in the possession of Stettin. Because Stettin was not involved in the sexual abuse litigation against Epstein, he does not have detailed knowledge of the persons or subjects discussed in the various e-mails and other records. + +On June 28, 2010, a hearing was set before this court on Epstein's Motion t mpel the Trustee to produce the documents responsive to Epstein's subpoena. On t ate, tettin's counsel, counsel, and counsel for Epstein all met in the hallwa e courtroom and worked out an agreed resolution to the dispute. All counsel agEleed that Stettin would turn over to counsel all documents responsive to the rpoe and Wat counsel would then prepare a privilege log and produce all doc tt" a are not subject to objection or privilege. At that point, Epstein could pursue any'the ments that he wanted in this Court \ argu /---\_ regarding materials not produced. As a result of the agreement, the Court never held the hearing on the Motion to Compel. Epstein's co-tinsel agreed to draft a proposed consent order for all the parties. + +\()' Despite the agreement between the parties, Epstein's counsel never prepared that agreed order. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States 11/ Bankruptcy Collet for thekSouthem District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion \\, to Compeliwoduction of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in the bankruptcy proceeding being ov by by the bankruptcy court (Judge Raymond Ray). See Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel 'Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol Established by DE #672, In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR (DE 807) (attached as Exhibit "C"). In his motion, Epstein recounted that he had served a subpoena + +on the trustee. See id. at 2. Epstein did not inform the bankruptcy court, however, that he was seeking the same information from and that had raised claims of privilege. Nor did Epstein mention that he bad previously filed a motion to compel before this Court. Instead, Epstein claimed to the bankruptcy court that "[p]roduction of these documents from the Trustee is critical to issues in the state court lawsuit. Without access to the emails ik question, Movant will suffer unfair prejudice and will be unable to obtain information critical to his ' lawsuit." Id. at 3. Epstein also stated that he was "willing to reimb'se the Estate for its reasonable expenses incurred in reviewing the documents for privileied matters and preparing a Privilege Log." Id. at 4. + +In response, on July 19, 2010, filed to for Protective Order (DE 818) (Exhibit "D") and an amended Motion for Prot Or (DE 819) (Exhibit "E.") to restrict this production so that privileged or oth Qon toverable material was not produced. A hearing was held on that Motion and that appointed as Special materials responsive to the kubpoena from Stettin and to prepare a privilege log (DE 888) (Exhibit "F"). 3, 2010, the bankruptcy court entered an Order ward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney to take all + +Special, Carney did take possession of the materials; however, after reviewing the materials he irninHediately realized that there were obvious problems if he (the Special prepared stplivilege log. Specifically, lacking familiarity with the sexual abuse litigation, the Special Master had no way to determine which materials were relevant and of those relevant materials, which were privileged. Moreover, the privileges were not the Special to assert or waive. Rather, the attorney-client privilege and other privileges were held by clients of + +and himself. As a result of these problems, on September 20, 2010, Special Carney filed a Motion to Clarify Order Appointing Special (DE 1013). (Exhibit + +On September 27, 2010, then filed another Motion for Protective Order (DE 1022) (attached as Exhibit "H"). In that motion, explained that "Eps asks this [Bankruptcy] Court to usurp the properly exercised jurisdiction of the Cl 19 ourf over a subpoena duces tecum issued by the state court in connection with an ac state court." Id. at 1. further noted that he had previously ding before the to this information being turned over in state court and that this was Epstein' to backdoor his way into obtaining information to which he is not entitled." Id. it tice ) + +On October 10, 2010, the bankruptcy cotirt entered an amended order modifying the production procedures and the role of the Special Master (DE 1068) (attached as Exhibit "I"). In this Amended Order Respecting Production of Documents Regarding Jeffrey Epstein, the bankruptcy court directed the Rusteelo produce all of the materials in question to law firm — =, Jaffe, Weissmg, Edyards, Fistos & Lehrman. = Jaffe was then directed to produce a privilege of all materials. The privilege log was to be provided to the Special . The Special was, in turn, to "schedule a hearing . .. where all parties in interest will have rtunity to provide written submissions respecting the privilege log and to make argutpc i a 1 issues relevant to the applicability of privilege as to the documents listed on the Yaffe privilege log. That hearing shall be transcribed by a court reporter." Id. at 3. Then, "[fJollowing completion of the aforementioned hearing, the Special shall prepare a report making all appropriate findings and recommendations to the Court, which shall be served on all + +parties in interest and filed with the Court, along with the transcript of the Special hearing. . . . If an objection to the report is filed by any party in interest, then this Court shall schedule and hold a hearing to resolve with finality the issues of privilege as consistent with the appropriate law and procedures set forth herein." Id. + +Following the entry of this order, Trustee's counsel delivered several di containing more than 70,000 pages of materials to Jaffe. Some of these material e-mails from the RRA computers and other materials are electronically stored case f ning pleadings, discovery, correspondence between counsel and other case related ate Ws. While some of these materials are connected with the Epstein litigation, malty o them arc not. Most of the materials do not appear to be responsive to the Epsteirt.sufipcen originally served. + +On November 2, 2010, filed a motion in bankruptcy court requesting relief from the Amended Order. See Motion for Relief from Amended Order [DE1068] and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of all Documents in Response to His Request (DE 1120) (Attached as Exhibit "J"). It was then also discovered that the disks provided to were not identical to those pilovided to Special Carney and a meeting was set up between Special Carneyyl to compare the disks and get the correct disks in hands to begide-view of the materials. As a result, on November 10, 2010, Special Camey met witia. The disk problem was sorted out, and was then provided the same tbrials that Special Carney had, from which was ordered pursuant to DE 1068 to begin preparing a privilege log. + +During the meeting with Special Carney, it became apparent that the result of creation of a privilege log and his anticipated objections to the production of + +irrelevant and privileged materials was on a path for a hearing ultimately before the bankruptcy court ruling on the scope of this Court's subpoena and possible restrictions from it. + +### DISCUSSION + +### THIS COURT, RATHER THAN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, IS THE PROPER FORUM FOR LITIGATING THE SCOPE OF SUBPOENAS SERVED IN THIS CASE. + +As is apparent from the foregoing recitation of the facts, Epstein has mentless retaliatory lawsuit against into a different court - the bankru ° - and then sought to have rulings on the application of privileges in this Court' cas lcpd e by that court. This backdoor approach is not proper, as the issues surround before this Court for several reasons. rt's subpoenas belong + +First and foremost, Epstein is now deploying his retaliatory lawsuit to burden and other lawyers at his firm with requests to review tens of thousands of pages of documents for privilege claims and other discovery issues. Because the Trustee has produced what amounts to every single piece of paper that eyen retrtotely relates to an Epstein case rather than just those documents responsive to the'suu , is now forced to review more than 70,000 documents to create a privileg>lag1. + +While it ypight !(e appropriate to force the attorneys to review some portion of those documents ( i Ls vi e lawsuit were at hand, Epstein's lawsuit is entirely meritless. As explained at len trill= pending motion for summary judgment, Epstein's case should be ., sununanly rejected for three separate reasons: First, under the well-established "sword and shield" doctrine, Epstein cannot assert a Fifth Amendment privilege to deny access to relevant discovery about his lawsuit while simultaneous trying to force to pay damages. Second, because Epstein has repeatedly taken the Fifth when asked numerous relevant questions + +about his lawsuit, no reasonable jury could find in his favor. And third and most fundamentally, Epstein's lawsuit completely lacks any factual basis whatsoever and does not even make an attempt at alleging a viable damage theory. + +If the Court were to agree with and grant his summary judgment motion on any of these three separate grounds, then it seems likely that the entire discovery disput unding Epstein's subpoenas to and the trustee would be considerably narrow perhaps even eliminated entirely.' It makes no sense that extensive satellite liti -going in the bankruptcy court about subpoenas in Epstein's case when Epstein'stase jtself is meritless and malicious. Of course, the bankruptcy court has to assume bound to recognize a presumptively valid subpoena tha m's case has merit — as it is as issued through this Court. Only this Court can rule on the lack of merit to Epstein's case and then narrow or eliminate this separate litigation about the subpoenas. + +Second, even assuming arguendAbat E stein's case could survive the pending summary judgment motion, the banIcruptcy ao,utt, simply not the proper forum for determining privilege claims in this case. Without . anYwa y challenging the legal acumen of the bankruptcy court, the ultimate issues o ge in this case must be decided by this Court. Whatever the bankruptcy co S may . cdfielude about certain privilege arguments in the context of discovery, this Co hav erent judges taking time to rule on the same issues. Rather, one court should make one bin "ng ruling one time on the privilege issues. The only court that can issue a final ruling av to ultimately rule on those privilege claims at trial. It makes no sense to + +Even if the Court grants summary judgment for M, this case will continue before this Court on counterclaim against Epstein. + +controlling at trial is this Court. Therefore, this Court should rule on the discovery issues as well. + +Third, only this Court can fairly evaluate MI claims regarding the scope of the subpoenas. Epstein has issued through this Court extremely broad subpoenas which are unduly burdensome on and his law firm. Yet the bankruptcy court does not have authority to grant relief from those subpoenas — only this Court can do that. Under rule 1.t80(c) of the ' - Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial judge may limit or prohibit discovery "to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or and bur en or expense." As explained in Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood Service, I o.2d 533, 535 (Fla. 1987), under this rule trial judges possess "broad discretion" discovery. But that discretion rests in the "trial court," id., which obviously is4r il ith the litigation pending before it. -"- The bankruptcy court cannot exercise discron to ict this Court's subpoenas. + +Finally, the bankruptcy court simply lacks jurisdiction to rule regarding privilege issues that have arisen in this Court's case/ case/It well settled that the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction is limited to "(1) cases under title 11 ...;(2) 'core' bankruptcy proceedings that either 'arise under' the Bankruptcy Code r 'arise in' a case under the Code, or (3) cases in which all interested parties 'conse o the b>nkruptcy court having jurisdiction to enter a final order in a matter that is 'rela under the Bankruptcy Code." In re Ray, --- F.3d ---, 2010 WI. 4 I60135at \* 4 ( m i 10) (internal quotations omitted). Ruling on privilege claims from a subpoena issued y this Court in a tort suit filed by Epstein (who is not a party to the bankruptcy proceeding) against (who is likewise not a party to the bankruptcy proceeding) does not + +fall within any of these grants of jurisdiction to the bankruptcy court and therefore Epstein's proposed procedure is without jurisdictional foundation. + +#### THIS COURT SHOULD ENTER A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR RESOLVING THE PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND THEN ANY SURVIVING PRIVILEGE ISSUES. + +While could file a jurisdictional objection to the bankruptcy court ruliug on this issue, he does not want to spawn further litigation that could delay a resolutiOn,gt the privilege issues. Instead, proposes that this Court simply assert jurisdiction otter its subpoena and the litigation that has arisen from it. The subpoena to has propounded were issued on the authority of this Court. this Court can simply withdraw or stay enfor consolidating the litigation surrounding its sub binding rulings on both the merits (or I privilege issues concerning the subp a tot e trustee that Epstein ingly, it is indisputable that is subpoena, thereby simply is Court. This Court could then make of Epstein's lawsuit and any surviving + +therefore respectt'ly\pr \ oses that the Court take the following actions: + +1. Hold its scheduled hearing on summary motion on January 5, 2011. The Court shall then Ttite>on whether any of Epstein's claims survive summary judgment motion. After [making those rulings, the Court should then rule on whether Epstein's subpoenas should be quashed in light of its rulings. If the Court concludes that parts of the • \_ \_\_/ sub —Temain viable, then the Court could rule on any remaining claims of privilege or other objections that have not been mooted by its summary judgment rulings. + +2. Stay further enforcement of its subpoenas to the trustee and to pending further rulings by this Court on the merits of Epstein's underlying lawsuit and any privilege or other issues that might raise to the subpoenas. + +3. Direct to prepare a privilege log regarding documents that are actually responsive to the subpoenas. Such privilege log shall be prepared within 30 days 11 ing this Court's ruling on pending summary judgment motion assuming any4 by pstein survives. At that time, shall also produce to Epstein any doc are responsive to the subpoenas to and to the trustee and for which th o privilege or other objection to production (i.e., vagueness in the subpoena or nea nably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence). + +4. Epstein shall then file any objet \Itim of privilege or other objections within 15 days following respons A\ + +5. shall file any response t Epstein within 10 days following receipt of the objections. + +In addition, it is clear at there is an imbalance of financial resources between billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and th s on whom he is serving subpoenas. This Court possesses the . /- authority to "threcta the requesting party to pay the costs and expenses of providing discovery." N. , \a-PHILIP J. PFD6VASNO, vFLORIDA CIVIL PRACTICE, § 10.3 at 354 (2007-08 edition) (citing CBS, Inc. v. Jae \*78 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1991); Mt. Sinai Med. Cir., Inc. v. Torbay, 555 So.2d 1300 \ (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)). Given the vast sums available to Epstein to pursue his meritless litigation, he should be directed to pay to =, Jaffe and Stettin all costs associated with responding to + +his discovery requests, including reasonable costs of attorney's time and any copying or other expenses. + +Because proceedings are on-going in the bankruptcy court regarding these issues, [REDACTED] is simultaneously giving notice to the bankruptcy court, the trustee, and the Special [REDACTED] that this pleading is being filed and providing a copy of this pleading to each of them. + +### CONCLUSION + +This Court should stay further enforcement of its subpoena to Edwards and to the trustee Stettin pending further ruling on the pending summary judgment motion regarding Epstein's lawsuit. This Court should also enter a protective order narrowing the scope of Epstein's requests and requiring Epstein to pay all reasonable expenses associated with responding to his requests. This Court should then grant [REDACTED] pending summary judgment motion against Epstein, and then rule on any surviving privilege or other issues concerning Epstein's subpoenas. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 30th day of November, 2010. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (9 \ Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 \me + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 'C'C/ Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +901 L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire i c ctiaSPH r Point West Burnett, P.A. 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 6170 Phone: (561) 727-2423 Fax: (561) 802-9976 '1 •Iiir, + +The HonorableXerbert . Stettin, Trustee One Biscayne 'Pokr Suite 3700' Two South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida f3313 I + +Robert Carney, Special 2281 Saratoga Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33409 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..902fef523efa73c0e63cfbc4b2cc2fbf56784058 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276/EFTA02769276.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,634 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769276.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 23287, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION FOR A STAY OF SUBPOENA PENDING RULING ON PREVIOUSLY-FILED \nMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND FOR \nSCHEDULING QRDER ON CREATING A PRIVILEGE LOG", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.19399999999999, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 528.7760620117188, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 528.7760620117188, + 380.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 86.19399999999999, + 380.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.8, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 370.906982421875, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 370.906982421875, + 342.9785461425781 + ], + [ + 242.8, + 342.9785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DISCUSSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 345.052001953125, + 149.85000000000002 + ], + [ + 345.052001953125, + 163.7235107421875 + ], + [ + 271.32899999999995, + 163.7235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIS COURT, RATHER THAN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, IS THE PROPER \nFORUM FOR LITIGATING THE SCOPE OF SUBPOENAS SERVED IN THIS CASE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.264, + 174.96 + ], + [ + 524.2423706054688, + 174.96 + ], + [ + 524.2423706054688, + 202.7235107421875 + ], + [ + 92.264, + 202.7235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIS COURT SHOULD ENTER A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ESTABLISH A \nSCHEDULE FOR RESOLVING THE PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION \nAND THEN ANY SURVIVING PRIVILEGE ISSUES.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 95.29899999999999, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 521.413, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 521.413, + 190.353515625 + ], + [ + 95.29899999999999, + 190.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.687, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 347.20399999999995, + 227.61 + ], + [ + 347.20399999999995, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 267.687, + 239.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.652, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 352.72381591796875, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 352.72381591796875, + 109.3585205078125 + ], + [ + 264.652, + 109.3585205078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769276" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc1dfe554ab57d793007dafd5effb919e5bba39e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +following: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED c , ersigned has called up for hearing the + +DATE: Tuesday, February + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +r, JUDGE: Honorable "cl F. (Palm Bea h County Courthouse) + +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +## IN F E CIRCUIT COURT OF ENTH JUDICIAL CIRC PALM BEACH COUNTY, T, IN AND LORIDA + +C SE NO.: 502009CA040800 BAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTI E F + +PLACE: 20K ci. Dixi ighway, West Palm B ch, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPECIFIatTTERS TO BE HEARD: + +\p-Defendant, I =E Motion to Dete ne Status of Defendant's Request for Stay + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disa accommodation to participate in this proceeding not later than seven (7) days prior to the procee' 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florid ilities Act, persons in need contact the Court Adminis ings. If hearing impaired, c Relay. of a special rator's office ntact (TDD) + +S . + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 28th day of January, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea426a1d1f23bc259c1f88acb753e40956b6843b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290/EFTA02769290.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769290.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2247, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN \nF \nE CIRCUIT COURT OF \nENTH JUDICIAL CIRC \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, \nT, IN AND \nLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.107, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.5867919921875, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.5867919921875, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 304.107, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTI E F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.516, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 366.62799999999993, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 366.62799999999993, + 362.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 235.516, + 362.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIatTTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 278.7309265136719, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 278.7309265136719, + 581.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 581.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.63199999999995, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 349.63199999999995, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769290" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b6e84fc3753992b7f55cbafaf4ac33aafb273c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +## MOTION TO F DEFEND ETER S RE NE STATUS EST FOR STAY + +## IN FITE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FI TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU T, IN AND F PALM BEACH COUNTY, 1LORIDA + +C SE NO.: 502009CA040800tXMBAG + +Defendant, EEV1ARDS, file Court's consideration o ITip accompanying motio Thursday, Janua Court to rev Court' 7 201 , and taken under con or orders of the Federal Bankru subpoena issued to the Federal Federal Bankruptcy Court continue and threaten t Defendant to litigate discovery issues in the forum and are required to be resolved. this Motion to determine th status of the argued before this Honorable Court on deration for the purpose of }permitting the tcy Court relating to compli ce with this Bankruptcy Trustee. P ings in the substantially prejudice the bility of the n which those issues are cu ntly pending + +"2 co •••••: • • • • • to + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Motion to Determine Status of Defendant's Request for Stay + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 28th day of January, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No•: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG ' Motion to Determine Status of Defendant's Requ st for Stay + +## OUNS L IST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +NM Jaffe, Weissing,M, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., squire Burnett, P. 901 Point 777 S Flagler D • West Palm B 401-6170 Phone: (56 Fax: (561 j 6 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4853077a732fd9451054ad33cca7b44cb25c0b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293/EFTA02769293.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769293.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2258, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION TO \nF DEFEND \nETER \nS RE \nNE STATUS \nEST FOR STAY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 185.742, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 418.4147644042969, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 418.4147644042969, + 416.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 185.742, + 416.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN FITE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFI TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU T, IN AND \nF PALM BEACH COUNTY, 1LORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.107, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.48193359375, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 529.48193359375, + 115.353515625 + ], + [ + 304.107, + 115.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OUNS L IST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.86553955078125, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.86553955078125, + 147.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 147.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769293" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..299f04bb4b29dc9f38dfac8b7c2b70cbb9901897 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +following: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIF c ime that Sh e undersigned has called up f **hearing the** + +DATE: March 30, 2011 C + +TIME: 8:30 a.m. + +JUDGE: We avid F. IN THE CIRCUIT COUR F ENTH JUDICIAL CIRC FO' PALM BEACH COUNTY, OF THE , IN AND LORIDA + +C E NO.: 502009CA040800 ♦ **AG** + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. L.M., individually, individually, and + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF SPECIA RING + +(15 + +PLACE: Beach County Courthouse Dixie Highway, West Palm B = h, a 33401 + +ROOM #: 9-C + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Motion for Leave to Assert Clai for Punitive Damages + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this heart +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 da +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the and envelopes. g unless the issue he JA. 0 double-spaced pages. s prior to the hearing. earing a blank proposed Otd copies s resolved. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she coy tatted opposing c resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. attempted to + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disa accommodation to participate in this proceeding, not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceed 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florid ilities Act, p sons in need of a special contact the Court Administrator's office ngs. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) Relay. + +kt-a) U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the a I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true ? co S et opy of the foregoing has been furnished by 7L- is • day of nuary 2011. + +r + +.7 + +Jac Scarola Flor da Bar No.: 169440 Sea y Denney Scarola Barnhart 82 Shipley, /P.A 213' Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard We• Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Pho e: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Au' ey for Defendant + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c958bfc81a7f0c4c2615e81484ff6728f59c8789 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296/EFTA02769296.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769296.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2634, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIA \nRING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.23999999999998, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 408.4170837402344, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 408.4170837402344, + 364.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 194.23999999999998, + 364.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.547, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 99.63 + ], + [ + 255.547, + 99.63 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769296" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769299/EFTA02769299.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769299/EFTA02769299.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bc696cd19a04769b3f15f53f78239e9d4187df8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769299/EFTA02769299.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +SHARON R. BCCH +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT COURT + +FILE + +2011 JAN 28 PM 3:30 + +**NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING** +(15 MINUTES) + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** March 30, 2011 + +**TIME:** 8:30 AM + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse +205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion for Reconsideration + +1. 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +2. 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +3. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +4. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +5. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +*Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing.* + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by *FAK-HUD* U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 28th day of January 2011. + +![]()Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXJ+ day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for Bradley J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]()cc: Andy Sporr +Madison Deposition Services \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769304/EFTA02769304.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769304/EFTA02769304.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5c99282e0e58f747f5a0d66bc1bd389a93fec87 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769304/EFTA02769304.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769304.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1160, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 327.78, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.055, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 525.055, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 327.78, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 430.363, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 430.363, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 160.85500000000002, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.48099999999997, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 394.55, + 459.2699999999999 + ], + [ + 394.55, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 232.48099999999997, + 473.84999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769304" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3c191d11f656eb39fe728377726a34f0b86eb4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +**ORDER ON DEFENDANT** [REDACTED] +**MOTION TO STAY SUBPOENA, ETC.** + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion for Stay of Subpoena, etc. The Court heard argument of counsel, has reviewed the Motion and has been provided with copies of various Orders from the bankruptcy proceeding for the Southern District of Florida. After thorough review of the above, otherwise being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +The Motion seeks a stay of a subpoena/notice of production non-party directed to the bankruptcy trustee, Herb Stettin, in the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of Florida which seeks production of various records from the now defunct law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. which are in the possession of the trustee in bankruptcy. In response to these requests as well as a number of other requests from other claimants against the debtor law firm, the bankruptcy judge has taken jurisdiction to determine various privileges associated with these records. The Motion seeks an Order from this Court staying any subpoenas or notice of production from this Court and, therefore, removing jurisdiction from the bankruptcy court to make such determinations. This Court declines to do so. The bankruptcy court has set up a procedure for review and + +2011 FEB -1 AM 11:53 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +determination of various privileges associated with these records. This Court will not interrupt that procedure. In doing so, however, this Court is not relinquishing any jurisdiction to ultimately determine whether or not records from the bankrupt law firm and/or any other records subpoenaed through this litigation are relevant, material, discoverable, privileged or not privileged for the *specific purposes of this litigation*. Moreover, this Court retains jurisdiction to determine whether any such privileges may have been eviscerated by reason of any alleged or claimed actions in this litigation. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 31St day of January, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +[REDACTED] L. ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE, 901 [REDACTED] Point West, 777 S. Flagler Dr., West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +[REDACTED], JAFFE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 +JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +THE HONORABLE HERBERT M. STETTIN, TRUSTEE, One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3700, Two South Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131 +ROBERT CARNEY, SPECIAL [REDACTED], 2281 Saratoga Lane, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +NOTA \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a9b4dc181adcbe0a3c0cdd1791e6374b6f40943 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306/EFTA02769306.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769306.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3063, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.46299999999997, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 491.46299999999997, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 62.117999999999995, + 97.19999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT [REDACTED] MOTION TO STAY SUBPOENA, ETC.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.098, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 398.286, + 272.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 398.286, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 196.098, + 298.08 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769306" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de91bcc8056fbab85a551a6ebc4eb1f9aa690e27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.md @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**FEB 31 2011** +**11 FEB - 1 PM 3:46** +SHARON R. BALL +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL CLERK + +**RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING** +(15 minutes) +(change of date only) + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +**DATE:** March 31, 2011 + +**TIME:** 8:30 AM + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. ██████████ + +**PLACE:** Palm Beach County Courthouse +205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion for Reconsideration + +1. 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +2. 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +3. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +4. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +5. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +*Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing.* + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 31st day of January 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Search Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant [REDACTED] + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.corn Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire 777 S Flagler Drive Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West West Palm Beach, FL 33401- 70 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffre A EpsItP + +Marc S. Nurik marc@nuri Law Offi S. Nurik One E Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lau le, FL 33301 Phone: (95 )445-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +cos + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves this Honorable Court to reconsider the attached Orders sustaining Plaintiff's objections to discovery requests (also attached), and in support thereof, the Defendant would show that the recent opinion of the 4th District Court of Appeal in ██████ v. ██████ Tire & Rubber Company (copy attached) supports the Defendant's position that the Orders of the Court improperly restrict Defendant's efforts to obtain information that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22ND day of December 2010. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Serrey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant ██████ + +Epstein v. Case No.: 502009CA0408003000CHBAG + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein C L) 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik 4 S4)) Phone: (954) 745-5849 One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ale(ame S H\ I Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Ese Burnett, P.A. Attonsir: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Point West +,/ 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 727-2423 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY • CIVIL DIVISION + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG. + +### R E ON PLAINTIFF O -DE PSTE 'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEIVBER 16, 2010 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Request for Admissions and Interrogatory dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED ERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Z Objections aCsus id as to Requests No. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, I3,14; 15 and 29. The Plaintiff/Cuter-Defendant's Objections to Requests 22, 25 and 28 are overruled. + +,7 DONE AND ORDERED this day of Palm peach County, Florida. eat Palm Beach, • + +> DA a F. CRO CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West each, FL 33409 E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Point West, West Palm Bea 01 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 • MARC DIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2,.Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE N& i bENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION , + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +### ORDER C - FEND EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION DEFENDANT RE • 0 PRODUCE DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2Q10 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Objections to Request to Produce dated September 16, 2010. The Court heard argument of counsel and Is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the • Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objection to Requests No. 1 and 4 are overruled. In all other respects the Objections are sustained at present. + +DONE AM ORDERED this ' L day of est Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +> DAVID P. CIRCUIT CO JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West each, FL 33409 E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Point West, West Palm eac , 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NUASUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc.; et al., + +Defendant(sj. + +### T ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/CO TER- EFENDANT IN'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT INTERR ORIES D TE SEPTEMBER 16 20 + +THIS CAUSE having come before the the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY .EPSTEIN's Objections to fe t, J. Interrogatories dated September 16, 2010. rt eta argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premise tipon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, O A ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Objections are sustain to Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9. As to question no. 7, the objection is sustained on ihetittorney/client privilege. The Court defers in regard to Interrogatory No. 8 pending the filing of an Amended Complaint by the Plaintiff. The - . Objections are overruled as to questions No. 1e\*0, 11 and 16. + +4 S DONE AND ORDERED this day of Dece 0 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +> DAVID F. C JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West ach, FL 33409 E. KNIGHT, ESQUIRE, 777 3. Flagler Dr., 901 Point West, West Palm each, 1 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. 3., Suite 1400; West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NUIMUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I 5TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. ua y + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.ItCiv.Pro. 1.241 + +Case No. 502009CA040800 •••• n A + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, STEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, J. REQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED R I6, 2010 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.350 Fl of Civil Procedure, files this his Response dated --. September 16, 2010 of Defendant/Co ter-Plaintiff, 3. M Request to Produce and states as follows: + +1. fI1 statements of the defendant, 1.M, pertaining to any of the issues in + +k C, ") Response: The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has not taken a statement of the Detbndant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. M, with regard to the allegations of this complaint The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to the scope of this Request because it may encompass all of the transcripts from the various proceedings and the various other cases in + +which Mr. spoke as counsel. As such, the Request is overbroad, burdensome, and seeks irrelevant information. + +- 2. All statements of any witness you intend to use at trial for impeachment. + +Response: Any statements that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, have taken at this time are protected under the work product privilege. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant will not know until depositions are taken, what statements may be available for use at trial for impeachment. C + +- 3. All documents including but not limited to di , journals, computer database materials or any other written or electronically stored infomsay that reflect or relate to any communication to or from minor females and/or any physical contact which did or was planned to occur between you and any person who was a minor females at the time of the physical contact or planned physical contact including but not limited to any massage, fondling, or sexual interaction of any kind (this should include all message pads or appointment scheduler for minor females) + +Response: Objections: irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and pro by the Fifth Amendment. + +'nen documents supporting the allegations in your complaint. + +C\ Response: Since discovery is still continuing in this matter, the Plaintiff/Counter- ,defendant, cannot produce all written documents supporting the allegations in the complaint. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has requested relevant documents from the bankruptcy trustee, to which the Defendant has categorically lodged objections, and the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant expects some of those records to support the allegations in the complaint. + +- 5. All message pads, calendars of your schedule or appointments or other documents containing your "massage" appointments; and + +Response: Objections: irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the harassment, and protected by Fifth Amendment. + +- 6. A complete copy of each and every exhibit which you intend to considered introducing into evidence at trial. + +Response: Since discovery is continuing, the Plaintiff/Co n dant does not blow at this time the exhibits he intends to introduce or ing at trial. + +# RTIFICATE OF S + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a miff and p itted via O Email, O Facsimile, sru.s. y of October, 2010 to: • the foregoing has been duly Delivery, C Federal Express this + +Jack Scarolk Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & S 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & W 250 Australian Aven uth Suite 1400 West Palm Beek, FL 1-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Malt S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: Josh L. Ackerrnan, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Fa • (04) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ Counter-defendant + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA04080WOCOCABAG + +PlaintifUCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTH TE I ividually, J. S Individually, an igirisclividually l + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLA1NTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA STEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, J. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 + +Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this his Response to Request for Admissions and Answer to Interrogatory of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, 1.370 and states as follows; J. pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure + +# IIPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO i REA + +- 1. objects to the Request for Admissions because the total, including thirty (30) requests. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.370(a). There are in excess of sixty (60) Requests for Admissions including subparts. +- 3. In addition to the objections above, with regards to Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to these requests on the grounds that they are + +irrelevant, burdensome, propounded for the purpose of harassment, and require information which would be protected by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. + +- 4. In addition to the objection in Paragraph I, with regard to Request for Admissions in Paragraphs 13, 14, 15, and 22, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests are irrelevant and propounded for the purpose of harassment. +- 5. In addition to the objection in Paragraph 1, with regard to Paragraphs 16, 17, 18, 19, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds are irrelev pro imded for the purpose of harassment, and the response would require Counter-Defendant to disclose attorney-client work product communications. +- 6. In addition to the objection in P regard to the Request for Admissions in Paragraph 25, 28, and 29, the Plairitif ter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests are irrelevant, overbroad and propounded for the purpose of harassment. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly funjished via O Email, O Facsimile, ur6s. Mail, ❑ Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this nay of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. • Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By: Jose Fla. Bar No. 235954 4014 L. Ackerrnsut, + +BIJRNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +ttomeys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff,' ter-defendant + +IN THE CIRCUfT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, and L.M., Individually + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLAIN'TIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL GENERAL INTERROGATOILIES 'S OBJECTIONS TO J. SEPTEMBER 16.2010 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Florida Rules of Citil Procedure, files his objections to the General Interrogatories of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. and would state as follows: + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1 + +Case No. 502009CA040800 + +- 1. With regard M Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9, the PlaintifKounter-Defendant objects be e interrogatories seek irrelevant information, are burdensome, are propounded o e purpose of harassment, and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth of the United States Constitution. With regard to Interrogatories 10, 11, and 16, the interrogatories seek information that is irrelevant, burdensome to produce, and unlikely to lead to discoverable information. + +3. With regard to Interrogatory No. 7, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a troy and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via O Email, O Facsimile, M' IS. Mail, Cl Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this ` 'day of October, 2010 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +• A% C + +Marc S: Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 7 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 C + +> By Ace an, Jr. + +o 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 est 777 lagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (56I) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintifd Counter-defendant \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9434513a60055ea0a8f51d48ff870bbc69ebb53 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308/EFTA02769308.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1092 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769308.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 18218, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.76, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.356, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 543.872, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 543.872, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 308.356, + 115.83 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING (15 minutes) (change of date only)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.563, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 420.65099999999995, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 420.65099999999995, + 392.04 + ], + [ + 187.563, + 392.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.377, + 612.36 + ], + [ + 278.006, + 612.36 + ], + [ + 278.006, + 625.3199999999999 + ], + [ + 67.377, + 625.3199999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.765380859375, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 353.765380859375, + 110.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 110.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.66600000000005, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 522.372, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 309.66600000000005, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.312, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 398.748, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 398.748, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 213.312, + 316.71000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.216, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.30133056640625, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 349.30133056640625, + 130.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 264.216, + 130.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY \u2022 CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.68599999999999, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 473.642578125, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 473.642578125, + 149.0850830078125 + ], + [ + 109.68599999999999, + 149.0850830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "R E ON PLAINTIFF O -DE PSTE 'S \nOBJECTION TO DEFENDANT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS \nAND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEIVBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.804, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 473.0648193359375, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 473.0648193359375, + 332.8450927734375 + ], + [ + 141.804, + 332.8450927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER C - FEND EPSTEIN'S \nOBJECTION DEFENDANT RE \u2022 0 PRODUCE \nDATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2Q10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.318, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 463.56134033203125, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 463.56134033203125, + 330.215087890625 + ], + [ + 153.318, + 330.215087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.29199999999999, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 474.7700500488281, + 122.30999999999999 + ], + [ + 474.7700500488281, + 147.590087890625 + ], + [ + 110.29199999999999, + 147.590087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T \nORDER ON PLAINTIFF/CO TER- EFENDANT IN'S \nOBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT INTERR ORIES \nD TE SEPTEMBER 16 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.196, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 456.73223876953125, + 273.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 456.73223876953125, + 308.840087890625 + ], + [ + 161.196, + 308.840087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, STEIN'S RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, J. \nREQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED R I6, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.82799999999999, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.4136962890625, + 357.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 484.4136962890625, + 395.72906494140625 + ], + [ + 123.82799999999999, + 395.72906494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RTIFICATE OF S", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.704, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 369.65999999999997, + 327.24 + ], + [ + 369.65999999999997, + 341.5995788574219 + ], + [ + 232.704, + 341.5995788574219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLA1NTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA STEIN'S RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, J. REQUEST FOR \nADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.322, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 489.04200000000003, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 489.04200000000003, + 392.5945739746094 + ], + [ + 113.322, + 392.5945739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IIPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO i REA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 194.526, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 403.596, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 403.596, + 511.0945739746094 + ], + [ + 194.526, + 511.0945739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.66, + 420.9762268066406 + ], + [ + 371.17364501953125, + 420.9762268066406 + ], + [ + 371.17364501953125, + 433.4695739746094 + ], + [ + 230.66, + 433.4695739746094 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAIN'TIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL \nGENERAL INTERROGATOILIES \n'S OBJECTIONS TO \nJ. \nSEPTEMBER 16.2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.95800000000001, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 485.7848815917969, + 355.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 485.7848815917969, + 393.7145690917969 + ], + [ + 116.95800000000001, + 393.7145690917969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.73, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.8782043457031, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 374.8782043457031, + 223.4696044921875 + ], + [ + 236.73, + 223.4696044921875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769308" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47adbf6fa145ee361084184f71c67c474b9c0a0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,, + +v. + +Complex Litigation +Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201- Civil - Div. + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB + +Judge: AG - David [REDACTED] + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO +DETERMINE IF REHEARING IS APPROPRIATE** + +2011 FEB - 3 PM 3:20 +SARAH R. BOCK, CLERK +FLORIDA COUNTY +JUDGE CLERK +FILED + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned representative And pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Proceedings hereby files this Motion to Determine if Rehearing is Appropriate and in support thereof would state the following: + +1. On December 1, 2010, this Court entered an Order sustaining numerous objections that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant had asserted to the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Request for Admissions and Interrogatories. + +2. On December 22, 2010, Counsel for the Defendant, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") filed a Motion for Reconsideration. Pursuant to Local Rule 6, oral argument for Motions for Rehearing are not to be set except upon court order. A copy of Rule 6 is attached hereto and incorporated herein. To date, the undersigned counsel is not aware of a court order setting this Motion for Reconsideration. + +3. Notwithstanding, the undersigned counsel has received a Notice of Specially Set Hearing for March 31, 2011 at 8:30 a.m. + +4. Epstein requests notification from the court whether this hearing is in compliance with the Local Rule requiring a order by the court setting it. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff's M- to Determine if Rehearing is Appropriate + +- 5. The undersigned counsel certifies that .his Motion is made in good fa th and not for the purpose of delay. +- 6. Undersigned counsel certifies that he will attempt to resolve this motion without the need of a hearing. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true apd co Tect copy of the fore as been duly furnishe40, via O Email, O Facsimile, Er U.S. Mail, O Hand Delive P deral Express this I day of February, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. C.) West Palm Beach, FL 33409 A %C) Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +?S" + +n 6 \*) By: + +Jose L. Ackerman, Jr. 71a. Bar No. 235954 + +901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +BURNETT P.A. + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +In W40743440TION75-EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DETERMINE IF REHEARING IS APPROPRIATE-1LADOCXI2/Iil I-I I:40) + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FI TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU IN AND FOR PALM BEACH OUNTY, FLORIDA T + +## Loca Rule No. 6 + +## IN RE: PETITIONS FOR REHEARING. + +With the exception of moti•ns for new trial or rehearing pursuant to rule 1.530, la.R.Civ.P., or procedural rule, no petition for r hearing, mot reconsideration, or like pleading, shall be se argument except upon court order. he pet or motio be furnished the original the judge sha shall be filed with the clerk and to the assigned judge along with order. Upon consideration of either deny the petition or argument. tter, or shall set it for 1 oral + +DONE and S Cha ers at West Palm Beach, Florida, on this 19th of Febr ary, 1993. + +Appro Y the Supreme Court on pril 28, 1993 + +Daniel T K. Hurley, Chief Judg \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31d6b55422de483784076cebb53b36c923c03723 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325/EFTA02769325.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769325.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3586, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.83200000000005, + 34.019999999999996 + ], + [ + 521.913, + 34.019999999999996 + ], + [ + 521.913, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 272.83200000000005, + 76.94999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DETERMINE IF REHEARING IS APPROPRIATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.21200000000002, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 437.262, + 270.54 + ], + [ + 437.262, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 163.21200000000002, + 298.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.23999999999998, + 205.74 + ], + [ + 383.99810791015625, + 205.74 + ], + [ + 383.99810791015625, + 220.85302734375 + ], + [ + 219.23999999999998, + 220.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FI TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCU \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH OUNTY, FLORIDA \nT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.101, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 485.5941467285156, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 485.5941467285156, + 112.3251953125 + ], + [ + 115.101, + 112.3251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Loca Rule No. 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.538, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 411.8016052246094, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 411.8016052246094, + 145.7052001953125 + ], + [ + 293.538, + 145.7052001953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN RE: PETITIONS FOR REHEARING.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.741, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 308.2757568359375, + 166.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 308.2757568359375, + 179.085205078125 + ], + [ + 90.741, + 179.085205078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769325" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..912366f3e2bb7a03ac86457632ba0899a4ebf6a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF IN AND FOR PALM BEA E 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT H COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +CIVIL DI CASE NO. 502009CA Judge Davi I SION 40800XXXXMBAG F. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, Defendants. + +#### RE-NOTICE OF ARING- UMC + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the and Honorable David F. M, one of the Judges o County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie High sign Vown for hearing befoi.e ire a v -styled Court, in the Palm Beach m 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 8:45 a.m. folio ng: + +### PLAINTIFF I TO MEND COMPLAINT + +I hereby certify that I h e a good f noticing this motion for hearing.\_ ith attempt to resolve this ma ter prior to my + +PLEASE ERN YOURSELVES ACC RDINGLY. + +In acace with the Americans needing a special accommodation to panic Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 4796, no later than seven days prior to the p ith Disabilities Act of Ip9o, persons ate in this proceeding should contact ourts of Palm Beach Coimty, 205 N. 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355 oceed ing. + +'U) r4 - -n c?.. i' 73 , .n nn 0 -0 + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via Email and mailed this 1st day of February, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +![]()![]()W:\80743\NOTHRG75-NOH on M to Amend-JLA.docx + +## IN t CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM B CH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Co • plex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +No. 50 2009CA040800 ••••11 B AG + +L U 1 IFF + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Plaintiff or Eps in"), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, flu\*ion to Amend the Complaint in part for the reasons set forth below: + +- 1. On or about December 7, 2009, 3laintiff filed his action in this matter. +- 2. It is the essence of 'P against Epstein or fabricated o on the Epstein cases. +- 3. Is not the iiItention or position of th Plaintiff to put into issue whether or not the actions alleged against Epstein by various plainti are true or not. Instead, the essence of the complaint is to focus on the alleged misconduct of ling legal motions and other actions in pursuit of civil litigation unrelated to the merits or value o the cases brought against the P aintiff. More specifically, See the allegations contained on page 2 • f the complaint, paragraphs 10, 21, 25, 26, 31 tion that the Defendants used actual lawsuits et inve ents to third parties for a return of investment +- 41. + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint + +4. While the Plaintiff believes his com to remove any doubt as to whether the Plaintiff has claims brought against him, the Plaintiff moves to paragraphs: aint is clear, in an abundance of caution so as put into issue his alleged responsibility for the mend his complaint to eliminate the following + +- A. 42(e); +- B. 42(h); +- C. 46; +- D. 51; +- E. 52; +- F. 67(c); + +5. The Plaintiff res the records subpoenaed from the trustee have been records. However, this amendment is requested at th misapprehension, that the Plaintiff has placed in issu against him by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. additional amendments will be necessary once ived and depositions occur ating to those s time for the purpose of clearing'up any alleged his alleged actual liability in the cases brought + +6. The undersigned counsel certifies th theepurpose of delay. t this motion is made in good faith and not for + +7. The undersigned counsel certifies th this matter without the need of a hearing. the has and will continue to attempt to resolve + +Epstein v Rothstein, et al. +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 5th day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 South Flager Drive +West Palm Beach, FL +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* + +[nat] W:\80743\Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint\1/5/11-14:59) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68acb9920412b220189aad97dc67e4fdeae41b00 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328/EFTA02769328.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769328.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4844, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF \nIN AND FOR PALM BEA \nE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.769, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 463.3681945800781, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 463.3681945800781, + 72.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 146.769, + 72.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF \nARING- UMC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.06, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 395.84999999999997, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 395.84999999999997, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 207.06, + 311.85 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF I TO \nMEND COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.475, + 433.111572265625 + ], + [ + 432.9833984375, + 433.111572265625 + ], + [ + 432.9833984375, + 449.55000000000007 + ], + [ + 167.475, + 449.55000000000007 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN t CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nB CH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 292.92900000000003, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 527.394, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 527.394, + 128.103515625 + ], + [ + 292.92900000000003, + 128.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 379.407, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 379.407, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 177.39000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769328" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..106b803a27851a4ebdd6773b1772511caa299483 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK + +2011 FEB - 3 PM 3:52 + +FEB 10 + +NOTICE OF HEARING- UMC + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED], one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Monday, February 8, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., the following: + +PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DETERMINE IF REHEARING IS APPROPRIATE + +I hereby certify that I have made a good faith attempt to resolve this [REDACTED] after prior to my noticing this motion for hearing. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355-4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via Email and mailed this 1st day of February, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()W:\80743\NOTHRG75-NOH - M-Determine-JLA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..327eacac4d09fdcdb23ad7ac44de74bccf001c8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333/EFTA02769333.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769333.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1788, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.769, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.622, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.622, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 146.769, + 71.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING- UMC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 383.67, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 383.67, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 308.61 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769333" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f606f3dc80920ea088f70319e15b52897c79f27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT COURT +2011 FEB -4 PM 3:41 + +**FILED** + +NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, ██████ J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys, submits the designation of the entire deposition of Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, taken in this matter on March 17, 2010, which may be offered at trial in this matter. All exhibits utilized in the deposition will be introduced at trial. Defendant/Counterplaintiff may rearrange some of the designated testimony so that it is more understandable to the jury: + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 4/7 day of February, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for ██████ + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMRAG + +Defendant, Notice of Filing Deposition Designation + +Page 2 of 2 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esqu Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beac 33401-6170 Phone: (561) Fax: (561) + +sA Co \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab20c97273dc6892381ec17eb47b34aa75e6b713 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335/EFTA02769335.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769335.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2029, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PAGE AND LINE DESIGNATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.82, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 450.394, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 450.394, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 157.82, + 318.33 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.582, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.3382873535156, + 144.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 258.582, + 144.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769335" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e3e743dd53014429b87fb83f1935a432bc65607 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J individually, and L.M., individually, + +0 + +1,.. .2c..). CO ...4-•-: r rc . \_ + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEI TAP D POSITION + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XX XMB AG + +Defendants. + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi dSin y or an attorney of t e firm will take the deposition of: + +.. tS Name: S ala + +Date and Time: esday February 22, 2011 at 11:00 a. + +Upon Uponoral exa • t n , be 7 .4r- re DIAMOND REPOR NG AND LEGAL VIDEO notary publi I authorized by law to take de sitions in the State of New Yo . The oral examinatio ontinue from day to day until corn leted. This deposition is being taken for the purposes o discovery, for the use at trial, or for sue other purposes as are pennitt d under the rules of the Court. 0 any other + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correcI copy of the foregoing was mailed this 4 day of February, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denn Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for + +Place: Lester S hwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 120 Bro dway, 38\* Floor New Yo k, New York 10271 + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3af6fd2d6048e8043e506b8d074c0852cb309fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337/EFTA02769337.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769337.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1444, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEI TAP D POSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 155.29500000000002, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 442.13399999999996, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 442.13399999999996, + 340.2240905761719 + ], + [ + 155.29500000000002, + 340.2240905761719 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769337" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63f872e5f5e69a8b641d34604f0c463aa531d984 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.md @@ -0,0 +1,487 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro.120I + +v. + +Plaintiff, + +THSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +#### AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND) COMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND APPEAR FOR FUR k RER DEPOSITION + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") t Soct om ourt, pursuant to Rule 1.380(a), Fla. R. Civ. P., for entry of an order directing ml J. (" ) to appear for further deposition before a court a ' pecial and to respond to questions asked of him at his deposition taken on arch 3, 2010 and to answer such follow up questions as are appropriate. This motior addition to and supplements a previously filed motion on May 10, 2010 seeking the lar re ef. The grounds for this motion are: + +1. ast year, Epstein filed this action to recover damages from Defendants, Scott Rothst stein") and a, based on Epstein's well founded belief that the two, and possibly others, had perpetrated an illegal pyramid scheme directed toward unwitting investors who were defrauded into investing in settlements allegedly concerning Epstein as its centerpiece defendant who reportedly had settled and was expected to settle cases worth millions of dollars with clients of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA"). + +P•4 0 Cu rrl CO + +2. Specifically, targets were told by Rothstein that - then a member of RRA - represented under-aged women who claimed that they had had intimate relationships with Epstein, a wealthy man, and that this conduct had resulted in felony convictions against Epstein and civil cases leading to multi-million dollar settlements and that numerous other such women had sued or made demands of Epstein, who, the investors were told, would have little choice but to settle by paying them large sums of money or be exposed to further criminal and din arges.' + +3. The scheme seems to have been based on the notion that tO s. would take a lesser settlement if paid promptly and that the investors who funde ese y payments would be paid when Epstein paid the greater amounts to settle these + +4. Rothstein lured investors into turning ov othstein group approximately \$13 million as investments into fabricated settlethen\ s,b using one or two real cases then pending against Epstein that had been flied' by 1M. In effect, Rothstein and his co-conspirators sought to trade on Epstein's perceived "bad" name in much the same way as unauthorized persons sometimes misrepresent their connections and trade on the "good names" of \ 7 others. + +5. On Mark /237 2010, counsel to Epstein deposed =. During that examination, refused to answer numerous questions to which he or his counsel Jack Scarola °bleated. For example, he was asked generically about RBA's document storage system: + +Cc" And what type of information did you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? + +had filed suits against Epstein on behalf of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. before joining RRA, but some months after he joined the firm, he filed a second suit, a federal court action, on behalf of L.M. + +MR. SCAROLA: We're going to object . . . I will instruct you not to answer on the basis of both attorney-client and work-product privileges. + +Id. at 54. This question in no way threatened either privilege and could have been answered without disclosing any client confidence, strategy or manner of handling the litigation. + +6. counsel made it clear that his client would not answer any question when instructed not to answer. Id. at 55, lines 4-8. Epstein's counsel then asked Edwards how he came to join RRA. His counsel - based on a "privacy right" that is not a recognize.d privilege - would not permit questions to be answered about the terms of hire by Roth. , including his compensation. was asked about his job interview wi Rothstein: + +Q. Did [Rothstein] ask you how much you w ? + +A. I believe so. + +Q. What did you tell him? + +MR. SCAROLA: Obj Ins ct you not to answer on the basis of economic privacy. + +Q. What did MASI him that you expected? + +MR.NROLA: Objection, economic privacy. + +Id. at 72 4 - . O + +III am interested now. . . [is] what you told him . . . + +MR. SCAROLA: Objection, economic privacy, instruct you not to answer. It's neither relevant nor material nor reasonably likely to lead to relevant material information and invades the economic privacy of the witness. + +Id. + +Q. or less? And was the number that you gave him more than you had earned for the year 2008 + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection. + +Q. Did you tell him that you . . . wanted to make more money than you had in the proceeding year? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objections and instructions. + +Id, at 72-74; see also id 73, lines 20-24. I + +7. acknowledged that he was given yrnurtbefrbut was instructed on !) multiple questions not to answer because the question was deemed tily his attorney to be irrelevant and invasive of privacy rights. Id. at 7``3t Clearly, there was no basis for lawyer to direct not to answer questiohNbo the job offer he received from Rothstein. Moreover, relevancy is not a sufficient ground to silence a witness, especially in a case like this where incentives offered to and accepted by are plainly relevant to a determination of whether he was privy to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and why he decided even to join RRA. It is significantly relevant to his counterclaim since he is claiming loss of profits and injury to his professional reputation.2 + +8. then proceeded not to answer at least sixteen other questions claiming attomey=client privileges. (Copies of the applicable transcript pages are attached hereto as Exhibit + +2 cannot reply on privilege to shield disco relating to the subject of the privilege claim. At this point Doctrine. See Boys and Girl's Club of Marian County, Inc. v. A , caccio v. Mediplex Mandarin, Inc., 7l I So. 2d 1206, 1210 (Fla. 4ib DCA 1998) ("the law is well settled that a plaintiff is not entitled to both his silence and his lawsuit") at the same time claim monetary damages should be well versed on the Sword/Shield So. 3d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Bran- + +1.) For example, attorney instructed him when was asked how one plaintiff, E.W., came to contact referring attorney Howell. Id. at 89, lines 9-19. Edward's attorney told him he could not even answer the threshold "yes" or "no" question: Did [Mr. Howell] ever relate that to you." Id. + +9. in one instance when asked what his client E.W. told him o himselfclaimed privilege. Id. at 90. Later, when asked "for what purpo originally hire you?," his attorney objected based on so-called atto could have answered the question without disclosing infi confidential by his client L.M3 Id. at 99. the phone, s. L.M. ege, although tended to be kept + +10. Mr. Scarola also erroneously counseled not to answer a series of question about his communications with federal prosecutors{ ". . \.do you know whether, at the time that you represented Jane Doe. . . whether she was considered a victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office?" and then re-phrased: ". . .[D]id you learn'whether [Jane Doe 1] was listed as a, or deemed to be a victim by the U.S. Attorney's Officer 1d. at 100-104. Although contrary to law, Mr. Scarola's stated position was that any thing learned in the course of representation of a client is privileged, regardless of whether the'information came from the client or was in the nature of work product or simply told to the client in a discussion about another case. He announced Iv\* are not going to discuss anytl ng that Mr. did in the course of the prosecution of his claims on behalf of + +&#x27;3'facts are only protected by the attorney-client privilege if they arc intended by the client to be maintained in confidence and are communicated by one seeking legal advice from the attorney to whom the communication is made. Section 90.502 Fla. Stat.; Slate V. Rabin, 475 So. 2d 257, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Hoch v. Rissman, Weisberg, , 742 So. 2d 451 Fla. 5ih DCA 1999. Therefore, if the answer was evident from the complaint eventually filed by to seek redress from Jeffrey Epstein"), it would not be privileged. Likewise, if L.M. had initially hired to consult him about a claim she never pursued, the subject might arguably be privileged depending on the client's intent. Id. + +his clients. Id. at 100-104. Conceding only that the court might give some instruction on how it will interpret work product privilege "in this context," lawyer asserted that questions about interaction with the U.S. Attorney's Office "exert[ed] a chilling effect" on the work he continued to do for his three clients.4 Id. at 104. through counsel also raised relevance which is not an objection that would support a directive not to answer at all. See, e.g., id. at 105. This claim of privilege is also frivolous, because has lfitea.adversary lawsuits against The United States of America for alleged violations of the Criminal Victims Rights Act. 5 + +11. Next, Epstein's counsel asked about Rothstein) involverhent in the cases brought by against Epstein. testified that he bid fewer than three conversations with Rothstein about the Epstein cases. Id. at 112-113. ,Edwards described one, after conferring with his counsel to determine if it could be disci was privileged, which was merely a passing comment by Rothstein, "I want you to ophile." Id. at 114. The next was another such comment: "did you get that Ping et?" Id. at 116. Counsel continued: + +Do you remember a third occasion that [Rothstein] spoke to you regarding Epstein related c Q. + +A. ing e se that he ever spoke with me about related to Epstein related issues is attorney-c i t an work-product privileged information that I am not going to divulge. Id. at + +The three cases referred to above have concluded as of this time and there seems to be no way disclosure about communications with government lawyers could adversely effect now former clients. + +S See Jane Does No. I and No. 2, Petitioners v. United Stares of America, Respondent, Case No. 08-CV-80736-CIV-Marra' United States District Court, Southern District Court of Florida. + +Q. What was the legal issue [raised by Rothstein about Epstein]? + +MR. SCAROLA: Work product privilege. + +Id. at 126-127. + +Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? + +Id. at 155.6 + +Q. Who did [Mike Fisten] go to California to interview? + +Id at 170. + +wrongfully claimed the work product privilege for these questions as well: + +MR. SCAROLA: Objection, work product. Instruct you not to + +MR. SCAROLA: That is work product and I ins/ you not to answer. + +Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview a person t , of Michael Sanka? + +bb AS MR. SCAROLA: That is wo .,c d I instruct you not to answer. + +Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview \*vi 1 by the name of Michael + +MR. SCAROLA:. product and I instruct you not to answer ... any and all questions about investigativ will meet with the same objection and same instruction. + +Id. at 170-171. \,\* Q. Wj vas the first investigator that you believe was involved in investigating the in cases? ... + ++MR. SCAROLA: Work-product, instruct you not to answer. + +Id. at 179. + +6had by this time already put considerable allegations concerning the answer to this question into the records. Obviously, his clients' interaction with Maxwell was not intended to be kept in confidence. + +Q. Who other than Mr. Fisten from an investigator, from an internal investigator at RRA employee worked on doing investigation on the Epstein files? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work product], same instruction. + +Id. at 181. + +Q. trash? Did you ever tell them or direct [your investigators] to go through Mi r Epstein's + +Id. at 185. + +Q. Did you ever direct the investigators to go through the &ash of the lawyers who were representing Mr. Epstein including myself? + +MR. SCAROLA: . . . Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege]. + +Id. at 185-186. + +Q. Did you ever direct thexiffifestiga S ors to, during the time you were at RRA, to conduct a surveillance on - eth's property? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection t, attorney-client privilege]. + +MR. SCAROLAt e objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege]. + +Id at 186. [repeats simil ons and same objections, p. 187]. + +Q. D. u authorize your investigators to hire . . . informants? + +CAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] + +AgeDid you authorize your investigators to do electronic eve's dropping [sic] + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] + +Id. at 192. + +Q. Did you ever authorize any investigators to enter . . . Mr. Epstein's property on March 17, 2010? + +MR. SCAROLA: Objection . . .work-product privilege. + +Id. at 198. + +Id. + +Q. Are you aware of any investigators who entered Mr. Epstein's property on March 17ih, 2010. + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection as well as, attorney-client privilege. . . . + +Q. . . . did you authorize any investigators to trespass on Mr. Epstein's property on March 17ih of 2010? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection Work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. + +Id. at 198-199. + +Q. Did you authorize investigators to hide in the bushes at Mr. Epstein's house in order to take photographs . . .? + +instruction. MR. SCA lr. • Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and + +( S e Id. at 199, 1-12. + +> regarding I Did he ever perform investigation work on any of the Epstein files? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. + +Id. at 200. + +Q. [regarding investigator named "Rick"] . . . did you authorize Rick to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. + +Id at 200-201. + +Q. Would it be a correct statement that you have never autho yone from Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, to conduct any inves gati Jeffrey Epstein? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-prod omey-elient privilege]. + +Id, at 201. + +Q. [D]id you ever authorize or direct : Je\\$ e o perform any investigation on the Epstein files? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same 411jectio ( Sir\ [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. + +12. Counsel to botliKparties agreed that would identify investigators who worked at the direction of Edwards if the Court were to determine Epstein is entitled to this information. Id. at 202-203. Counsel to Epstein clarified that by moving on to other subject matter, he was not sysiving his right to pursue inquiry about these individuals. Mr. Scarola agreed. + +Id. at 203a4-16. + +13 Epstein's counsel proceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. refused to answer any questions about his communications with Rodriguez. Id at 208-210. He similarly refused to say if he was cooperating with any other lawyers. Id. at 223 (citing work product) + +Q. Have you had any discussion with any of the other lawyers who represent clients in the . . . matters regarding Mr. Epstein's probation? + +MR. SCAROLA: Same objection (work-product, attorney-client privilege) and instruction and joint prosecution interest. + +Id. at 223 + +14. The court must overrule the foregoing objections rais beNuse i 'many were never sought to discover privileged information and the privileges t absolute. In fact, the cases referred to - - L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe - - have all been there is no longer any basis to seek to protect most information gleaned in pr" S\* them as work product. This is particularly true given the allegations of this c.cover, even where work product is raised, the circumstances surrounding the Po sche e perpetrated at the Rothstein firm require responses to information directed t s and perpetrators.' A.. + +15. A special masteishould preside at the further deposition of in order to rule on objections and order answers where no valid objection is made and the Court or the designated Special should (a) examine in camera any documents referred to by and which he claims are work product to determine if they deserve protection from discovery in this case; and \\: j (b) taketektimony in camera on any question that refuses to answer based on privilege. + +V + +The sensational nature of the charges against Epstein in the cases brought by and others ought not diminish the fact that Epstein was used as bait by Rothstein and others to entrap third parties seeking investments. In this, those investors as well as Epstein - all victims in this scenario - have a compelling need to discover all of the evidence known to those who surrounded Rothstein and his cohorts. + +### LEGAL MEMORANDUM + +### A. Objections Based on the Attorney Client Privilege Generally Should Be Overruled + +During his deposition, and/or his counsel invoked a claim of attorney client privilege more than 15 times in response to questions that seemingly cove been answered without divulging confidential information obtained from client s t to information was given were seeking legal services from Transcript at 54, 89, 91, 98, 114, 116-117, 208; Exhibit A. In nearly the questions outlined above, t th time the e.g., Deposition ese, as evidenced by objection should be d and he should be required to answer the questions. He can do this without disci n v leged information. + +The attorney-client privilege applies Cit9\ id ntial communications made in the rendition of legal services to the client. Sect' .5 , Fla. Stat.; Southern Bell Tel & Tel. Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla.1994). 0.502 codifies the attorney-client privilege which protects those confidential co ns between attorney and client made to obtain or to provide legal services to the die tate v. Rabin, 495 So. 2d 257, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see U.S. v. Kelly, 569 F. {vo d 928; 93 (5th Cir. 1978). + +In ord in ke the attorney-client privilege, one must establish the following elements: (1) the asse er of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made (a) is a member of a bar of a court, or his subordinate, and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed (a) by his client (b) without the presence of strangers (c) for the purpose of securing primarily either (I) an opinion on law or (ii) legal services or (iii) assistance in + +some legal proceeding, and not (d) for the purpose of committing a crime or tort; and (4) the privilege has been (a) claimed and (b) not waived by the client. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 517 F.2d 666, 670 (5th Cir. 1975), quoting United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F.Supp. 357, 358-59 (D. Mass.1950). The burden of proof is in the first instance on the individual asserting the privilege to demonstrate an attorney-client relationship. C. McCormick Evidence, s 88, p. 179 (Cleary ed. 1972). , + +' The privilege does not apply to all communications between attorney and client. For example, where a client shared confidential communications with ahiattorney to confer about his client, her former husband, a client of that attorney, the confidential communications were not privileged. State v. Rabin, 495 So. 2d 257, 260 (Fla. 3d•DCA 1986)(even if the giving of such advice constitutes the rendering of legal services, it could irt serve as a basis for protecting earlier communications because those conununitationsIvere not made for the purpose of receiving said legal services). See Fisher v. U.S., 425 U.S. 391, 403 (attorney-client privilege "protects only those disclosures necessary to obt4 informed legal advice which might not have been made s k/ 7" absent the privilege"). + +Moreover, not all ccsnrnunications between attorney and client are privileged. For example, in Kilbourne & Son v. Kilbourne, 677 So. 2d 855 (Fla 1st DCA 1995), the court held that a worker's compensation attorney's advice given to a client that he was statutorily required to perform it -good faith job hunt in order to receive benefits for lost wages, was not a confidential communication within the ambit of the privilege; see also Watkins v. State, 516 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 523 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1988) (defendant's former attorney not barred + +from testifying at trial that he gave notice to client about the trial dates where defendant failed to appear). + +Once a good faith claim of privilege is made, the burden shifts to the adverse party to show that the communication was not privileged. Leithauser v. 168 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); see also Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Harmon, 580 So. 2d 192, 192-93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) ("[N]othing in the record indicates that any documents are protected by the attorney/client privilege. If petitioner thought some documents might be protected by either privilege, it should have listed the specific documents to which it cld rted he privilege attaches. Otherwise, neither the trial court nor this court has anything procedure is for the trial court to examine the dispute documents which fall into the privileged category. 780 So. 2d 231, 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) to address."). "The proper is in-camera and remove those te arm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kendrick, al court to order production of documents allegedly protected by attorney-clientp lege with instruction to counsel seeking discovery to decide whether the document waspi411fr\eged); see Parton v. Wiggs Contracting Co., Ltd., Inc., 698 So. 2d 933, 934 (Fla. 4th DC I'L947) (error to deny motion for protective order concerning 7 , subpoena duces tecum seeking records on basis of attorney-client and work product privilege without condu camera inspection of items in question to determine whether claimed privileges korman v. Hovnanian of Florida, Inc., 382 So. 2d 1376, 1378-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981 h Use of an in camera examination also applies to testimony a witness seeks to protect as privileged. State v. Young, 654 So. 2d 962, 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (trial court properly conducted in camera hearing outside of the State's presence to determine whether testimony was protected by attorney-client privilege). + +not: Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Sur Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of w \ k saying what it is and what it is + +Here, before a judge or special Florida law. testimony is required and a further deposition should be conducted so that privilege determinations can be made as required by + +## B. The Work Product Doctrine Does not Prevent from Responding to Questions at Deposition + +also claims that he could not respond to a host of questions at his deposition because to answer them would reveal work product. See, e.g., Deposition T r. t at 50, 54, 91, 100-104, 114, 126,-127, 155, 170, 181, 184-187, 192, 198-202, 205-2 , 0. , 212, 215-217; ramcc Exhibit I. + +> [T]hose documents, pict tc 4statments and diagrams which are to be presented as evidence are not wor products anticipated by the rule for exemption from discovery. Personal views of the attorney as to how and when to present evidence, his evaluation of its relative importance, his knowledge of which witness will give certain testimony, personal notes and records as to witnesses, jurors, legal citations, proposed arguments, jury instructions, diagrams and charts he may refer to at trial for his own convenience, but not to be used as evidence, come within the general category of work product. + +Id. at 112 (emphasis added). The "work product" doctrine protects documents and papers of an attorney or a party prepared in anticipation of litigation, regardless of whether they pertain to confidential -communications between attorney and client. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(6)(2). See Southern Bell Tel. & TeL Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1994). The privilege may also protect an attorney's mental impressions which may be disclosed through testimony. v. Ramos, 796 So. 2d 1269, 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (error to compel deposition answers over + +claim of fact and opinion work product without conducting an in camera hearing); State v. Rabin, 475 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). + +Notwithstanding the general rule, a party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by another party ( i.e., "fact" work product) upon a showing of (a) need for the materials to prepare the party's case, and (b) inability to obtain the substantial equivalent of such materials without undue hardship. Metric Engineering, Inc. v. Small, 861 So. 2d 1248, 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (to show 'need,' a party nt testimony or evidence demonstrating that the requested material is critical to a th of his case, or to some significant aspect of the case after which the trial court s c con uct an in camera review to evaluate whether the contested materials provide the iii ite dentiary value alleged by the requesting party and determine whether the re erials are substantially similar to materials already available.) + +( S \ Generally, fact work product irllibject o discovery upon a showing of "need." Rule - 1.280(b)(3), Florida Rules of Civil Prpeediire, provides for a limited privilege for "fact" work r- li \ / product - factual information concerning the client's case and prepared or gathered in connection \_ 17 with its preparation. Wal-Mari Stores, Inc. v. Weeks, 696 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (trial judge did not depart from essential requirements of by not protecting materials from discovery when plaintiff retailer presented no evidence to support its claim, but only made "a blanket statement that the requested items were prepared in anticipation of litigation."). + +On the other hand, opinion work product is absolutely, or nearly absolutely, privileged. The Rule requires courts to protect against disclosure respecting mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney ( i.e., "opinion" work product). The difference between + +the degrees of protection given oral and written statements is based partially upon this distinction between fact and opinion work product. + +Work product protection is limited to materials which are not intended to be used as evidence at trial. Northup v. Acken, 865 So. 2d 1267, 1270 (Fla. 2004) ("when a party reasonably expects or intends to utilize an item before the court at trial, for impeachment or otherwise, the A 4\ video recording, document, exhibit, or other piece of evidence is fully discoverable' and is not privileged work product."). In Northup, the court remarked that a litigant must decide whether the material is going to be used only for strategy and trial preparation purposes prior to the entry of a pretrial case management order by the trial court. If it is, the work product protection can continue. See also Gabriel v. Northern Trust Bank of Florida, NA., 890 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (request for production of documents that required party to produce all documents that 24 \ "relate to or otherwise support" each allegation-fin\the] complaint" and required attorney to make a determination of relevance are protected`work product unless the attorney expects or intends documents to be used at trial.) On t/Cother hand, if the party reasonably expects or intends to use the evidence at trial, for impeachment, or otherwise, the work product protection ceases and the material must be identified and disclosed.) + +If the co etermines that a particular request or question calls for the disclosure of protected wot product, before determining whether a requesting party has shown sufficient need and h trial court must first decide whether the material involved was prepared in anticipation of litigation. Airocar, Inc. v. 474 So. 2d 269, (Fla. 4th DCA1985) (citing Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company v. Turtle Reef Associates, Inc., 444 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 4th + +DCA 1984); Selected Risks Insurance Company v. 447 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA I 984)(urging trial court to make findings on that issue). + +If the requested material or information was prepared in anticipation of litigation and its disclosure has not been waived, then the requestor must allege "need and hardship" in the motion to compel supported by evidence such as an affidavit to establish both. Whealton v. M rshall, 631 So. 2d 323, 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (because motion "contained no claim e factual information in the memorandum is needed in the forthcoming evidenti information cannot be obtained from any other source without undgE hac rihip, the motion was g facially insufficient to compel production and should have bee an y denied"). or that the + +In this case, the questions that refused t estions concern the handling of cases that are now resolved while he was at the RRA criminal enterprise. There is a split of authority as to whether the work-product privilege extends beyond the case for which the work product was gathered. State v. Rabin, 495 So. 2d at 262; Alachua Gen. Hosp. v. Zimmer USA, Inc., 403 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 1st D&O981) (privilege continues after case concludes); United States v. International Business Machs. Corp., 66 F.R.D. 154, 178 (S.D.N.Y.I974) (privilege applies only if the work pyoduct was gathered in anticipation of the very case in which the privilege is sought); Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Mach. Corp., 207 F.Supp. 407, 410 (M.D. Pa.1962) (sarie); cf; Hercules Inc. v Exxon Corp., 434 F.Supp. 136, 153 (D.De1.1977) (privilege N extends trkorily those subsequent cases which are closely related); Midland Inv. Co. v. Van Alstyne, Noel & Co., 59 F.R.D. 134 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (same). In this case, there is good cause to overrule the objections bases on the work product doctrine and require to answer. + +The Rabin Case. One Florida court of appeal has carefully distinguished the difference between fact and opinion work product. In Rabin, the court of appeal concluded that the State was entitled to all of the factual information which the witness M, the former wife of Rabin's client, had transmitted to attorney Rabin during their conversation while Rabin was preparing her ex-husband's case. Because did not come to see Rabin to obtain legal advice, their conversation was not that of attorney and client and thus not privileged, so the substan'ce of her statements was discoverable. In Rabin, the trial court had ordered that Ra t have to respond to questioning regarding the initial conversation that took pla bet and him. On petition for writ of certiorari, the Third District concluded that t I court had departed from the essential requirements of the law by directing that Rabin ec\*a\_ spond to questions about what said and that, because Rabin could have had no significant interest in the substance of statements, the State should have been permitted to question Rabin regarding communications. The court clarified that Rabin did not need not to respond to questions concerning his half of the conversationor to questions which would require him to reveal either his mental impressions of the conversation, or his conclusions, opinions, or theories drawn from the conversation -- he needed only to respond to questions concerning the content of statements. R 5 So. 2d at 263-26, citing In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, ir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 (1986Xattomeys are not exempted from duty to ap ve evidence before grand jury merely because they are attorneys). + +As for the trial court's decision to require Rabin to produce documents relating to his conversation with other than his notes, the court of appeal found no departure from the + +essential requirements of law and that the State was entitled to Rabin's fact work product but not his opinion work product. 495 So. 2d at 263. + +# C. No Objection Based on a Non-Existent Privilege Should be Sustained. + +actually received while at RRA is relevant to explain how he came and what his motives may have been to assist Rothstein in factors did not exist, there is no recognized economic p p lege and a confidentiality order limiting the use of compensation information to uld reasonably resolve any legitimate concerns. is not entitled simply to in this case. During his deposition, also raised something called economic privacy as a basis not to answer questions. See Transcript at 72-74. While may have som interest in keeping his earnings to himself, in this case he has raised a Counterclaim e h suffered damages to his earnings due to the filing of this action. Moreover, w offered and his practice to RRA racy. Finally, even if these + +### CONCLUSION + +WHEREFORE, based on forigoing grounds, Jeffrey Epstein requests that the Court enter an order (I) appointing a special to consider objections of made at his deposition in March 2010 and overruling those that are unfounded, (2) directing Mr. to submit to a further deposition to answer questions he previously refused to answer and permit follow up'sku s as counsel to Plaintiff deems appropriate, (3) examine in camera any x documents referred by in his claims of work product, and (4) awarding Epstein his reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining such order and such other relief as the Court deems proper. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Motion to Overrule Objections and Compel Defendant to Answer Questions and Appear for Further Deposition was served by mail this 3 rrday of February, 2011 on: A Cos + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denne rola Barnhart & Shipley Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorneys for Scott Rothstein One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +w:%0743NIOTCompet.docc + +ckerman, Jr. ar #235954 Knight s \*rida ) Bar #607363 + +C + +URNE'fT, PA M s for Plaintiff Point, West Tower B 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901 West Tower West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 + +Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. + +Case No.: 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +DEPOSITION OF J. + +| Page/Line | Testimony | +|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 50/5-11 | Q. When I describe both the Jane Doe versus Jeffrey Epstein case and the L.M. versus Jeffrey Epstein case being on Qtask, I don't necessarily mean just the pleadings. I mean any aspect of it, not necessarily the pleadings or the fact that the case was there but the factual circumstances surrounding either case. | +| 50/12-15 | A. I am not going to into what my work-product privilege, I am not going to allow you to pierce that privilege. I am not going to tell you what, regarding those cases, was or was not on Qtask. | +| 54/9-10 | Q. And what type of information did you put into Qtask regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? | +| 54/14-17 | A. SCAROLA: We're going to object and that I will instruct you not to answer on the basis of both attorney-client and work-product privileges. | +| 72/10-12 | Q. Did he ask you how much you were making at that time or how much you had made the preceding year, '08? | +| 72/13 | A. I believe so. | +| 72/14 | Q. What did you tell him? | +| 72/15-16 | A. SCAROLA: Objection. Instruct you not to answer on the basis of economic privacy. | +| 73/2 | Q. What did you tell him that you expected? | +| 73/3 | A. Objection, economic privacy. | +| 73/5-8 | Q. All I am interest now, not necessarily what you were earning but what you told him, i.e., Mr. Rothstein that you wanted to get or expected to earn if considered a job at RRA. | + +| A. | SCAROLA:Objection. Economic privacy, instruct you not to answer. It's | +|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Q. | Did you tell him that you — did you tell him that you wnated to make more | +| Q. | Why did E.W. come, why did she hire you in the first placChat as the | +| purpose? | — | +| A. | This is going to get into attorney-client privileged information as to why she | +| Q. | What kind of - what has he [Mr. Howell] done?' | +| A. | SCAROLA: Objection. Attorney-client privilege and work-product. Instruct | +| A. SCAROLA: I am going to obje | „7 ct. That calls for attorney-client privilege. | +| | / \ Q. At the time do you,know whether, at the time that you represented Jane Doe | +| Q. | With regard to the question, I am not interested in what you learned from | + +Prior to the filing of the lawsuit against Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 against the United States Government, did you learn from any source, maybe a document, maybe a telephone call or a conversation that you had with a third party separate from your client, that E.W. was a victim or was deemed to be a victim by the United States Government or the United States Attorney's Office? + +101/16 + +101/17-18 + +101/20 + +101/21-22 + +101/24-25 - 102/1-6 + +102/7-8 + +102/24-25 - 103/9-16 A. SCAROLA: Samc objection and instruction. + +Q. Same question with regard to L.M. + +A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. + +Q. And same question with regard to Jane Doe. + +A. Same objection and instruction. + +Q. Prior to your filing the lawsuit with ever any conversations with the United Sst subject of the lawsuit or Jeffrey Eps S t? " , itefl'States Government, did you omey's Office-regarding the + +A. Same objection and instru + +Q. All right. Did you everipealc ith =Villafana during the pendency of that litigation which instill pending today.— + +SCAROLA: Are-you asking whether such conversations occurred that were relevant to his pivecution of the claims on behalf of his three clients? + +103/18-22 + +103/23-25 - 104/1 + +THel: Sure. + +SCAROLA: Then the instruction remains the same. The objection remains the + +Q. So, even if, do ou - even if you talked about it with Mrs. Villafana, even if your client Mr. spoke with Mrs. Villafana about a scheduling issue, it's your position that its what, work-product? + +A. SCAROLA: That's correct. We are not going to discuss anything that Mr. did in the course of the prosecution of his claims on behalf of his clients. + +| 104/2-9 | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| else from the time, with sal na | to the Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus USA case, | +| you would instruct Mr. 104/10- 104/14-25 | not to answer those questions? | +| work-product privilege in this context. I might also add that it is o - 105/1-12 | sition that continues to do on behalf of his three clients. | +| It is intended to as a means to obtain discovery | t oul, not othersie be | +| available in those pending claims. It intended to annoy | • d embarrass Mr. | +| Epstein in a lawsuit that has absolutely no foundation | a ever, and was filed | +| for purposes other than a legitimate claim agai | based upon any | +| good faith belief that he engaged in any fo | per or tortious conduct and | +| — those inquiries are not reasonably calc | t t -, . to the discovery of | +| admissible and relevant evidence. So foioc , | se reasons we object. | +| 114/11 Q. What did he [Rothst | y | +| 114/12-19 A. SCAROLA: T | t that you can answer that question without | +| disclosing any | ions with regard to the lawsuit or any | +| attorney-client | vile communications, you can answer. To the extent that it | +| may invade eithe respond. | work-product or attorney-client privilege, you should not | +| 116/21-23 Q. you member a thrid occasion that he spoke to you regarding Epstein | | +| re ion, cases? 116/24-25 | | +| - 117/1- Anything else that he ever spoke with me about related to Epstein related | | +| ,.. ih going to divulge. | | +| 126/13 Q. What was the legal issue? | | + +| 126/20 -25
- 127/2-7 |

A. SCAROLA: If this was an issue that was identified during the course of the legal proceedings to opposing counsel, then I am going to allow you to identify the issue without getting into any of the substance of the discussion regarding that issue.

If this was an issue that was identified in the course of the proceedings to opposing counsel, I am going to object and instruct you not to answer on the basis of the work-product privilege.

| +|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 155/19-23 |

Q. What was, what is the purpose; that is, with regard to your three clients and only your three clients – what connection if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to those individuals?

| +| 155/24-25 |

A. SCAROLA: Objection, work-product. Instruct you not to answer.

| +| 170/19-20 |

Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview a person by the name of Michael Sanka?

| +| 170/21-22 |

A. SCAROLA: That is work-product and I instruct you not to answer.

| +| 181/19/23 |

Q. Who other than Mr. Fisten from an internal investigator at RRA employee worked on doing investigation on the Epstein files?

| +| 181/24-25 |

A. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction.

| +| 184/20-23 |

Q. Did you ever direct your investigators to go through Mr. Epstein's trash?

| +| 184/24-25 |

A. SCAROLA: I am going to object, work-product, attorney-client privilege.

| +| 185/2-5 |

Q. Have you directed – this is the investigators during the time you were at RRA and that's the question you're claiming the privilege over, correct?

| +| 185/11-13 |

A. SCAROLA: I am claiming the privilege with respect to any action that was taken by Mr. ██████ or at Mr. Edward's direction – in connection with the investigation in prosecution of the claims against Mr. Epstein.

| +| 185/15-20 |

Q. With regard to your investigators, you gave direction with regarding the Epstein cases, during the time you were with RRA did you ever tell them or direct them to go through Mr. Epstein's trash?

| +| 185/21-22 |

A. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction.

| + +| 185/24 -25 186/2-3 186/19-22 186/23-24 | were representing Mr. Epstein including myself? | | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| 187/2-4 187/5-6 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. surveillance on Mr. Epstein's property? | 0 | +| 187/8-10 187/11-12 | Q. Have you instructed anyone, either of the i surveillance of Mr. Epstein's property? | investigators to conduct | +| A. 187/14-17 | SCAROLA: Same objection, | n. | +| Q. | Have you authorized inves | loyed by RRA, either employees of | +| | the firm or an outside investi | , to walk around the perimeter of Mr. | +| | Epstein's home on or about | R 17 of 2010? | +| 187/18-19 | A. SCAROLA: St r ,) | same instruction. | + +| Q. Did you au | is6 your investigators to hire informants? | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------| +| A. S | O A. ame objection, same instruction. | +| 198/18-20 Q. Are you ware of any investigators who entered Mr. Epstein's property on | | + +| 198/21-23 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection as well as attorney-client privilege and instruct you not to answer. | +|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 199/1-2 | Q. Did you authorize any investigators to trespass on Mr. Epstein's property on March 17, 2010? | +| 199/3 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 199/6-10 | Q. Mr. [REDACTED], did you authorize investigators to hide in the buses at Mr. Epstein's house in order to take photographs of either Mr. Epstein or any associated objects on his property? | +| 199/11 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 200/7-8 | Q. Did he [Mr. [REDACTED]] ever perform investigation work on any of the Epstein files? | +| 200/9 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 200/22-24 | Q. Did you authorize Rick to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? | +| 200/25 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 201/3-6 | Q. Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? | +| | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 201/19-24 | Q. If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research to conduct any investigation of Jeffrey Epstein? | +| 201/25 | A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. | +| 202/4-11 | SCAROLA: We're not going to permit Mr. [REDACTED] to answer any questions about either what he did or what he didn't do that are part of the work product involved in his representation of the Plaintiffs with claims against Mr. Epstein whom Mr. [REDACTED] is representing. | + +| | Q. After Mr. Rodriguez's deposition, did Mr. Rodriguez ou. | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Mr clients' rights and for that | +| | reason we are obliged to int tho privileges in their broadest sense unless | +| and until the court dece | ore restrictive interpretation should be | +| | 'y have done in | +| Q. Did you speC | Rodriguez between his first and second? | +| A. SCAROLA: | e objection, same instruction. | +| 210/8 \ | | +| Q. Between July 29th | and August 7th 2009, did you speak with Mr. Rodriguez at | +| C | CAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. | +| fort | mony, documents, or any other information associated with any | +| 212/12-15 | Q. Did you sign any affidavit or give any sworn testimony associated with the | + +| A. I am not here to divulge any anything that may waive my attorney-client or | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| A. I believe any communications that I would have had with respect to Ms. | | +| Villafana would have only been in the interest of pursuing clannsl | ozbehalf of the | +| clients that I represented. Therefore, I am going to claim a | uct privilege | +| Q. My question was is only did you speak with her | filing that | +| A. SCAROLA: Same objection, same i | | +| Q. Have the only conversations | have had with Ms. Villafana only been in | +| the context of Jane Doe 1 and | A only in the context of that case? | +| A. SCAROLA: Same | ion. | +| Q. Have you had an oceasi n to speak with Ms. Villafana with regard to the | | +| criminal compl | 'lit invted Alfredo Rodriguez? | +| A. SCA OLA: Smote objection, same instruction. | | +| Q y of | e three clients who have claims against Mr. Epstein? | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0034ecd6a47e6ac2a72ad0b9db0aa78c051dd58 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339/EFTA02769339.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769339.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 30, + "chars": 61237, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.16, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL \nMOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND) \nCOMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS \nAND APPEAR FOR FUR k RER DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.326, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 485.24755859375, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 485.24755859375, + 362.30853271484375 + ], + [ + 130.326, + 362.30853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LEGAL MEMORANDUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 397.442138671875, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 397.442138671875, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Objections Based on the Attorney Client Privilege Generally Should Be \nOverruled", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.86699999999999, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 541.0082397460938, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 541.0082397460938, + 154.863037109375 + ], + [ + 109.86699999999999, + 154.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Work Product Doctrine Does not Prevent from Responding to \nQuestions at Deposition", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 109.61999999999999, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 541.5575561523438, + 153.09 + ], + [ + 541.5575561523438, + 184.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 109.61999999999999, + 184.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. No Objection Based on a Non-Existent Privilege Should be Sustained.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.229, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.1008605957031, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 502.1008605957031, + 153.738037109375 + ], + [ + 110.229, + 153.738037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 280.14, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 366.3161926269531, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 366.3161926269531, + 429.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 280.14, + 429.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.586, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 405.3881530761719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 405.3881530761719, + 87.10748291015625 + ], + [ + 241.586, + 87.10748291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769339" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04f7c6f044533c820d95e2fc349170db5e9fc8cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMI3AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and n(4 J. individually, t 1 'ril -n + +;;-o= -,)=-> ea ..i-m :izo la = •;:p 0 ; . , • r I.") o at "2 co Li < a:, —gen --1 — -1c7c) + +Defendants. cI + +/ C • - + +NOTICE OF HEARING (Spec e 0 min.) a + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the and tgpe s set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. IM one of the Jud S Si o p above-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixi wa , Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on Friday, April 1, at 9:00 e ollowing: + +EPSTEIN'S AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND APPEAR FOR FURTHER DEPOSITION + +The following procedures must be noted on all specially set hearing notices in Division AG14. / ) + +- A cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach Coun 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Num 61) 355- 4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the fore I ts emailed and , I mailed this gi day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., O roward Boulevard, Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL AV e Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola , , 2139 Palm Beach Lakes + +3344S) + +4 \1 . Ackerman, Jr. ar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e32d7a287ed81e4c01d3e1f3a3e2b15adc00d0c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369/EFTA02769369.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769369.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2167, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.536, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 466.7481994628906, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 466.7481994628906, + 73.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 150.536, + 73.8580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 114 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769369" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cddaee11d10555ba2a66df62ba854d98b9d731e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.md @@ -0,0 +1,363 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. , individually, + +Defendants. + +## A MOTION TO COMPEL/MOTION TO DETERMINtIF PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ARE WAIVED + +7 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epsteips CPlaintiff or Epstein") by and through his undersigned counsel files this his Motion Co ., I; in the alternative, Motion to Determine that z s.... Privilege Claims of J. Ed are as follows: dwards") are waived. The grounds for this Motion + +- 12 -- 1. / • :•. :r-Nf L.- AP?) CO + +- 1. On April 10, the Plaintiff served a Request to Produce to Defendant . A cop uest to Produce ' "I" to this motion. +- 2. On ay 11, 2010, counsel for filed his Response to Plaintiffs Request to Producer \t py of at Response to the Request to Produce is attached as Exhibit "2". +- 3. The Plaintiff asks the Court to note that these were requests for documents in Defendant possession or control as opposed to those documents or records in the possession or control of the bankruptcy trustee. +- 4. Paragraph 4 requests all emails, correspondence, etc. by and between Mr. Rothstein and Mr. on the one hand and several of their investigators relating to Mr. + +Epstein's case. Objections were filed based on work product and/or attorney-client privilege; and to date, no privilege log has been filed. + +5. Paragraph 6 requested fee sharing agreements between Mr. a RRA and/or Scott Rothstein relating to any aspect of Mr. Epstein's case. Objections were based 46.4 n 0erelevance and other non-privilege grounds. Paragraph 31 of the Complaint demonstrate t th records are relevant. Moreover, in addition, the Defendant has a •• m that seeks damages for among other things his reputation, interference in prof sio relationships, loss of an d/or RRA -%iliC2I t to that issue and should be value of time required to be diverted from his professional abilities. The compensation relationship by and between Mr. produced. + +-C1'\ 6. Paragraph 9 asks for costs or mein f costs made by the Rothstein firm against Mr. Epstein. Defendant rescitiscis 'based on relevance and not on any claim of privilege. The Requests are relei v —ari toi sed on the allegations in Paragraphs 10, 13, 14 and 31 of the Complaint. + +7. Paragraph'till5 f the Request is similar to Paragraph 9 in that it requests documentation RRA. .%i is based on relevance. Paragraphs 10, 13, 14 and 31 of the Complaint shows thdtthe allegation is relevant. g to any liens for any attorney's fees or costs asserted by the trustee for + +8. Paragraph 17 seeks documents supporting the contention made by the Plaintiff for alleged sexual assaults on airplanes. Defendant objects on several non-privilege grounds which include relevance, vague, over broad, etc. See Paragraphs 34-36 of the Complaint where this is a material part of the Plaintiffs abuse of process claim. + +9. Paragraph 18 seeks records similar to those described in Paragraphs 9 and 10. Defendant has not made a privilege claim. The documents are relevant. See the allegations in Paragraphs 10, 13, 14 and 31 of the Complaint. + +10. Paragraph 20 seeks the foundation for statements made to the court ; • one of the pending cases. The objection is based on work product for which no privl 7 e lo has been provided. Objections of vagueness and over broad have also been lodged,' ' + +11. Paragraph 21 seeks documents relating to potential deponents named by in each of the three (3) cases against Mr. Epstein. The objections include work product and ii attorney-client privilege for which no privilege log/ has/ been prepared. The documents are -•"1 ' relevant based on the allegations contained in Paragraphs 38-41 of the Complaint and should be produced. + +12. Paragraph 22 seeks documents\_supporting Mr. claim for damages with a response of not yet determined. Plainti Aff Epstein cannot formulate a defense to such a claim in absence of those damages and reque,Sts an order compelling the production of those records. + +t 13. Paragraph ilteks emails exchanged between Mr. and a number of named individuals ing to Mr. Epstein. The objections are based on attorney-client work product pxtyi c d no privilege log has been prepared. + +14.E Under the case of TIG Insurance Corporation of America v. M, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001) and its progeny, states that the failure to timely provide a privilege log may be grounds to determine that a waiver of privileges have occurred. Given the extraordinary passage of time without the preparation of privilege log, the Plaintiff submits those privileges have been waived. + +15. The Plaintiff submits that the discovery request are reasonable, relevant and calculated to lead to other discoverable and admissible evidence. + +16. The undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forego% i ailed this az day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Brow e , Suite 700, KA' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach L s Boulevard P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +> Vvvysks os L. Acke an, Jr. fla, Bar No. 235954 + +BOWLER BURNETT, P.A. 01 Point West 77 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W:1807431MTKPL75-MOTIO SC O ION TO DETERMINE IF PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ARE WANEDILAA/ocx + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, requests that Defendant, J. (I' produce or make available for inspection documen - sporysive to the requests below within thirty (30) days from the date of service;/'' + +## DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS + +A. "Document" means any written or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed 'SranscrIbed, including the originals and all non-identical copies, whether diffe the original by reason of any notation made on such copy or otherwise, but not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, letters, purchase orders, telegrams, teletype, telefax bulletins, e-mails, electronic data, meetings, reports, or other communications, interoffice and intra-office telephone calls, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, worksheets, receipts, returns, trade information regarding fabric, carpets, samples + +![](_page_4_Picture_14.jpeg) + +etc..., computer printouts, prospectuses, financial statements, schedules, affidavits, contracts, cancelled checks, transcripts, statistics, surveys, magazine or newspaper articles, releases (and any and all drafts, alterations and modifications, changes and amendments of any of the foregoing), graphs or aural records or representations of any kind, including, without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, recordings, motion pictures and electronic, mechanical or electric recordings or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, discs and recordings), and including the file and file cover. + +The term "Document' also means any and all computer records, data, files, directories, electronic mail, and information of whatever kind whether printed out or stored on or retrievable from floppy diskette, compact diskette, magnetic tape, optical or magnetic-optical disk, computer memory, hard drive, zip drive, jaz drive, orb drive, microdisk, external memory stick, software, or any other fixed or removable storage media, including without limitation, all back-up copies, dormant or remnant files, and any and all miscellaneous files and/or file fragments, regardless of the media on which they reside and regardl whether the data consists in an active file, deleted file, or file fragment. k + +Q "Communications" means any oral or written statement, dialogue, , discussion, conversation or agreement. + +"Plaintiff means L.M. (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051,1OOOCMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA02805(OOOO(MB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/. 1, and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not + +yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any employee, agent or attorney for any plaintiff and/or any other person acting for or on behalf of any plaintiff, or under her authority and control. + +- D. "RRA" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. + +- E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. + +- F. "Costs" include, but are not limited to, court costs, filing fees, Sheriffs service and any other necessary service of legal papers or notices or subpoenas, court reporters' charges, long distance telephone charges, postage, courier services or Federal Express or UPS, investigative costs, investigative bills, photocopies, faxes, Westlaw computerized research, travel expenses, and witness fees and expert witness fees and costs. + +- G. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. + +# REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION' + +- 1. For the time period from March 1, 2009 to present, any and all documents between, or on behalf of RRA, Its employees or agents or clients, and any third party regarding a purported settlement of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, or the financing of any litigation between Jeffrey Epstein and a RRA client or Plaintiff, (whether existing clients or fabricated clients), including but not limited + +- to: 6S, Documents indicating that litigation with Jeffrey Epstein has been settled; + - c. Soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; paid or to be paid by Jeffrey Epstein; Soliciting or receiving money in return for settlement funds allegedly + - d. Soliciting money to be given to, or used on behalf of, the Plaintiffs in litigation against Jeffrey Epstein; + - e. Communication between third party investors or potential investors and the Plaintiffs or their attorneys involved in litigation against + +I Due to the potential vo documents Involved, the parties and the Court should consider appointment of a special and/or an In camera Inspection to address any objections, claims of privilege and generally manage he production of documents. + +Jeffrey Epstein; + +- f. Payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any Plaintiff. + +2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: + +- a. Any Plaintiff and J. has been associated; +- b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. or any entity with which he + +IMI ails, data, correspondence, memos, or si cements between J. , Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffre rich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). + +S . ails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between J. giSco g tt W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or representative of RRA regarding Jeffreise hich mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, or Rick (Rich) Fandmy). + +5. All agreements or documents of any nature which were provided to or received from an investor or potential Investor relating to any case (real or fabricated) involving Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: + +- a. W. Ro st • +- b. J. +- c. FtA +- e. any entity formed by RRA or J. or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment cwt.' for third party investors to invest in any plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein + +6. AU fee sharing agreements between J. RRA, or Scoff W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or Investor ing to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. . + +7. \*Or documents made available to any investor or potential investor by Bradley J. RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicirinvestors or any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. + +8. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all Individuals or entities who invested or purported to Invest In any aspect of any case against Jeffrey Epstein. + +9. All documents evidencing the Costs and payment of any bill or Costs in each Plaintiff's case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the source(s) for said payments of any Costs. + +10. All documents received by you or your current firm wherein the Trustee of RRA has asserted a lien for attorney's fees or Costs arising out of work done and Costs incurred related to the Plaintiffs' cases during the time Plaintiffs' were represented by RRA. + +11. All documents and tangible things retrieved from the trash at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida which is alleged to be the home of Jeffrey Epstein. + +12. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be that of Jeffrey Epstein that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +13. All conversations recorded from any telephones which purported to be from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys Including Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, that are contained in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +14. All intercepted phone conversations authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA related to Jeffrey Epstein that are saved or stored in any media (audio tapes, CDs, DVDs, zip drives, hard drives or any other electronic format and any written transcriptions). + +15. All Intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to or from Jeffrey Epstein authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +16. Alf intercepted or acquired electronic mail (e-mails) to and from the attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Including but not limited to: Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz or Jack Goldberger, authorized by RRA including but not limited to any one of Its attorneys or investigators or anyone retained by or working for RRA. + +17. Ali documents supporting the contention that a sexual assault took place on an airplane purportedly owned by Jeffrey Epstein or a Jeffrey Epstein entity at any time between 1998 and 2005. + +18. All documents related to the amount of all Costs that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prim, to joining RRA. + +19. All documents setting forth to the amount of Costs were incurred by RRA in its representation of Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. during the time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). + +20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Halele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: + +- J. +- a. t., zothstein +- b. Adler (S,, 'Ti iam Berger Michael Fisten + - e. Kenneth Jenne David B Deborah", Richard (Rick) Fandrey + - k. Christina Kitterman. + +"What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as far as our Investigation resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day of his life, made an attempt to sexually abuse children. + +We're not talking about five, we're not talking about 20, we're not talking about 100, we're not talking about 400, which I believe, is the number known to law enforcement, we are talking about thousands of children, and it is through a very intricate and complicated system that he devised where he has as many as 20 people working underneath him that he is paying well to schedule these appointments, to locate these girls." + +(A) Provide all documents to support this assertion including any documents which are the source of the information. + +21: All documents related to or mentior\*Ij fiat deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W. cases. + +22. All documents that support yo tact . damages In your counterclaim In this case. + +23. The written fee agree s i the Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you in this case + +24. All emails exchiged n you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or a similar reference was mentioned; + +25. A copy of your RRA business card. + +26. Any employment agreements, letter agreements or memos given to you by RRA or a representative or agent of RRA describing your compensation and benefits at RRA. + +27. All documents and communications from Herbert Stettin, as bankruptcy Trustee for RRA, asserting liens against recoveries in: + +- a. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB +- b. E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB +- c. Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA [REDACTED] + +**Certificate of Service** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 12th day of April, 2010: + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos +& Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-524-2820 +954-524-2822 – fax +Attorneys for Defendant, L.M. + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 +Fax: 561-835-8691 +Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +686-6300 +383-9424 F +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +954-745-5849 +954-745-3556 Fax +Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein + +**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP** +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 842-2820 +(561) 283-0164 Fax + +By: + +![]()*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)* + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +11.040011, Individually, an . nd ue , + +Defendant. + +DEFENDANT ppJ. NSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST RO ATED APRIL 12. 2010 + +Defendant, J. EDWARDS, hereby files his Response to Request for Production propounded by Plaintiff on April 12, 2010 as follows: + +- 1. None. + - a. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. + - b. None. Objection as to communications to or from investigators as that Is protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. Objection; any such communications are protected by the work-product and /or attorney-client privilege. +- 5. None. +- e. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, without waiving objection, there are no fee agreements with any investor. + +EXHIBIT + +Mk: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +- 13. None. +- 14. None. +- 15. None. +- 16. None. +- 17. Objection, reiev4, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague; overbroad, ambiguous. +- 18. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. +- 7. None. +- 8. None. A +- 9. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated tO to the discovery of admissible evidence. tTh +- 10. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. +- 11. None. +- 12. None. 4 6C) +- 19. Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and protected by the work-product privilege. 1).14.-/Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product privilege. +- 21. Objection, vague overbroad and any and all such documents are protected by the work-product and attorney-client privilege. +- 22. Not yet determined. + +502009CA040800XXXX64BAG Response to Request for Production dated 4/12110 + +- 23. Objection. +- 24. Objection; attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege +- 25. None in Defendant's possession. +- 26. None. +- 27. None In Defendant's possession. O4 + +4s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via 1FAX.AND U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list on April 11th, 2010. + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +Attorneys for Defendant, [REDACTED] +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9461 + +By: + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] Response to Request for Production dated 4/12/10 + +COUNSEL LIST + +Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire +Michael J. Pike, Esquire +Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP +303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-842-2820 +Fax: (561)-844-6929 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jack Goldberger +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Gary M. [REDACTED], Jr. +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, +Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 +Attorneys for L.M. + +Marc Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: 954-745-5849 +Fax: 954-745-3556 +Counsel for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6deebd3048fa6e3fb5718844db8c4d3f19feca72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/EFTA02769371.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,826 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 22232, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.39, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_14.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.75, + 61.875 + ], + [ + 467.4981994628906, + 61.875 + ], + [ + 467.4981994628906, + 91.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 151.75, + 91.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A \nMOTION TO COMPEL/MOTION TO DETERMINtIF PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ARE \nWAIVED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.338, + 331.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 529.7171020507812, + 331.4815673828125 + ], + [ + 529.7171020507812, + 370.863037109375 + ], + [ + 81.338, + 370.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.76999999999998, + 326.30029296875 + ], + [ + 389.8284606933594, + 326.30029296875 + ], + [ + 389.8284606933594, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 178.76999999999998, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.19, + 448.540283203125 + ], + [ + 404.5710144042969, + 448.540283203125 + ], + [ + 404.5710144042969, + 462.3170471191406 + ], + [ + 221.19, + 462.3170471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.05299999999997, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 394.11749267578125, + 411.48 + ], + [ + 394.11749267578125, + 427.4370422363281 + ], + [ + 230.05299999999997, + 427.4370422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.83099999999996, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 373.912, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 373.912, + 217.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 262.83099999999996, + 217.07999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.033, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 519.0262451171875, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 519.0262451171875, + 170.5670166015625 + ], + [ + 315.033, + 170.5670166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.372, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 383.62399999999997, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 383.62399999999997, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 240.372, + 184.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.897, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 369.66299999999995, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 369.66299999999995, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 285.897, + 185.49 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769371" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/_page_4_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/_page_4_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..043290d17c479b2b72d92960d073c8242d3da0ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769371/_page_4_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8f80c361e49ecb055118c6a04e4cdaff901b2a0d11fcae3f4682f71e9ac051f8 +size 7687 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b3173e2a806ae6add5c5d9740b82f610a6a4433 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTIISTEIN, individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +rN3 cz c o ..1 PC + +## NOTICE OF HEARING (Spec 5 min.) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the and tgp set down for hearing before the p Honorable David F. , one of the Jud S o h above-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixi wa , Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on Tuesday, April 5, at 8:3 following: + +## EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL/MOTION TO DETERMINE IF PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ARE WAIVED + +The following procedures must be noted on all specially set hearing notices in Division AG: + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order + +with copies and envelopes. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Num 61) 355- 4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the f as emailed and mailed this ,e2/ / \_. day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., O Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarolg , 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 3\ + +#S' + +Ackerman, Jr. . Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W.I3074394O NOH cm Epstein's M-Compel IS min.-ILA dixx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9574cf6e0a71e800ec77b54eb60cbd1cf2331901 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387/EFTA02769387.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769387.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2054, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.536, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 466.7516784667969, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 466.7516784667969, + 74.853515625 + ], + [ + 150.536, + 74.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING (Spec 5 min.)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.02999999999997, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 433.87396240234375, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 433.87396240234375, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 176.02999999999997, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL/MOTION TO DETERMINE IF PRIVILEGE \nCLAIMS ARE WAIVED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.98, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 522.02, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 522.02, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 84.98, + 490.04999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769387" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769389/EFTA02769389.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769389/EFTA02769389.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ffad37c83209687d753a7647e1ba01c304ae1fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769389/EFTA02769389.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DETERMINE IF REHEARING IS +APPROPRIATE** + +**THIS CAUSE** having come on before the Court on February 8, 2011, upon the Plaintiff's Motion to Determine if Rehearing is Appropriate, and the Court having reviewed the Motion, hearing argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff's Motion to Determine if Rehearing is Appropriate is hereby GRANTED. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 8th day of February, 2011. + +![]()David F. [REDACTED], +Circuit Judge + +Copies Provided: +See Attached Service Lists + +SHAKON R. BOCK, CIERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5TH FL + +2011 FEB - 8 PM 12:48 + +FILED +FEB 8 2011 + +Order on Epstein's M/Determien If Rehearing Appropriate + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. cli + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0498(j0XWMTAG + +a) + +COTT ROTHSTEIN individually, RADLEY J. , individually, d L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF tRING + +DGE: Honorable David F.(Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +PLACE: 20<5`N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: e + +## SPECIFeATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Defendant J. =1. Motion to Compel + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 10th day of February 2011 + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +goldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +Fowler [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769391/EFTA02769391.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769391/EFTA02769391.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8f048bf75e09a1ad8551649634879fbc297fac7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769391/EFTA02769391.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769391.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2481, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.52, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF tRING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.73, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 370.27, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 370.27, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 236.73, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFeATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.77, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 280.20172119140625, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 280.20172119140625, + 587.25 + ], + [ + 66.77, + 587.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 107.73000000000002 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 107.73000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769391" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfb26d7d847d1dd5359bbbb7f5cfe6a05d06f6e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +1st in compliance with this ediation Procedures dated A under certificate date Au enables Defend whether they ectionable. The Defendant, J. Mi e t his Honorable Court to enter an order 'peNt Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, to ile an Exhibit er Set ing Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and 010. The :xhibit List filed by Plaintiff, Jkffrey Epstein, 2010, fails to id ntify individual documents in a manner that to dete ine what the specific documents are and ough the undersigned a meys, moves + +FORE, Defendant, J. to Compel and requiring Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein Court's Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pre 2010. moves for an Order grat ng his Motion file an Exhibit List in comp lance with this 'al and Mediation Procedures rated April 10, + +## THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FITEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND Ft R PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +C SE NO.: 502009CA040800tXXMBAG + +EFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +S. + +Carr ROTHSTEIN individually, RADLEY J. , individually, d L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## DEFENDANT J. MjION TO COMPEL + +r.c + +-71 co Knox + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 10th day of February 2011, + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9456 +Attorney for Defendant Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +goldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +Fowler [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abe579e5542e7854bef94c610ee2a7824cb829e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394/EFTA02769394.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769394.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2566, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFITEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFt R PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.53499999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 540.913818359375, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 540.913818359375, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 306.53499999999997, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT J. \nMjION TO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.68399999999997, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 480.8182067871094, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 480.8182067871094, + 362.60302734375 + ], + [ + 128.68399999999997, + 362.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.184, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 350.20799999999997, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 350.20799999999997, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 257.184, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769394" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28faf6c7005da9b25cea91517266fc46993a7fb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.md @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA040800XXXXMHAG + +FILED +II EP II AM II 08 +CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FLORIDA STATES DISTRICT + +RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Thane Ritchie + +Date and Time: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Place: [REDACTED] & Bell +32 West Monroe Street, Suite 2700 +Chicago, IL 60603-5404 + +Upon oral examination before Madison Court Reporting, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 8/15 day of February, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for + +B dley J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33 I09 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys f r Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., St 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfu ly submitt + +Jo h\_L. an, Jr. Fla. Baz o. 235954 + +Espirito Santo PI Floor 1395 Bric(kell Alkn Miami, Florida 33'13)- 302 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +2130 + +A/b + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS +COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Scott Rothstein, individually, +J. J. J., individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No.: 2011 HR 000150 + +*Clark Sheldon* +CLERK OF THE +CIRCUIT +DISTRICT COURT ILLINOIS + +11 FEB - 3 AM 9:19 +FILED + +ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENA + +This cause this day having come on for hearing at the request of the Circuit Court of the 15th District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida compelling the witness, Thane Ritchie be present for his deposition and this Court having found this request well taken directs the clerk of the court of DuPage County, Illinois to issue deposition subpoena compelling Thane Ritchie to be present for his deposition on February 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 03 day of FEBRUARY 2011. + +*Bonnie M Wheeler* +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE HILIP H. SHELDON +DEPUTY CLERK + +[REDACTED] R. Marconi, Esq. +[REDACTED] & BELL, LTD. +Suite 2700 +33 West Monroe Street +Chicago, Illinois 60603 +(312) 372 - 0770 +Firm ID. 40505 + +STATE OF ILLINOIS + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +COUNTY OF DU PAGE + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +CASE NUMBER + +-VS- + +Scott Rothstein, Individually, +J. J. J. Individually, +and L.M. Individually, + +Defendants. + +File Stamp Here + +SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +To: Thane Ritchie 706 Howard Street, Wheaton, Illinois GREETINGS, +YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED AND COMMANDED TO APPEAR before a Notary Public at +33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 in Chicago Illinois on February 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.M., then and there to submit to a deposition to be taken in a certain cause now pending before this Court, said deposition to be taken upon oral interrogatories propounded by the attorney or attorneys listed. + +YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to bring the following documents or tangible things which constitute evidence relating to said cause and which are listed below; and then and there to testify and speak the truth concerning the same. +See Attached Schedule A + +Supreme Court Rule 204(c). The Discovery Depositions of nonparty physicians being deposed in their professional espace may be taken only with the agreement of the parties and the subsequent consent of the deponent or under a subpoena limited upon order of court. A party shall pay a reasonable fee to a physician for the time he or she will spend testifying at any such deposition. Unless the physician was retained by a party for the purpose of rendering an opinion at trial, or unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the fee shall be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken. Supreme Court Rule 203. Unless otherwise agreed, depositions shall be taken in the county in which the deponent resides or is employed or transacts business in person, or, in the case of a plaintiff-deponent, in the county in which the action is pending. However, the court, in its discretion, may order a party or a person who is currently an officer, director, or employee of a party to appear at a designated place in this State or elsewhere for the purpose of having the deposition taken. The order designating the place of deposition may impose any terms and conditions that are just, including payment of reasonable expense. + +YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SUBPOENA MAY SUBJECT YOU TO PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT. + +WITNESS: CHRIS KACHIROUBAS, Clerk of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Wheaton, Illinois + +![](_page_3_Picture_57.jpeg) + +Chris Kachiroubas +Clerk of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit + +I served this subpoena by delivering a copy to via process server on and I paid the witness \$ for witness and mileage fees. + +Subscribed and Sworn before me +Dated + +Signature of person making service + +Notary Public +Name: Marconi +DePage Attorney No.: 40505 +Attorney for: Plaintiff +Address: 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 +City/State/Zip: Chicago, Illinois 60603 +Telephone: 312-372-0770 + +NOTICE TO WITNESS +The attorney who has requested this subpoena is listed herein. Any questions regarding your knowledge of the subject matter or testimony in the case should be directed to him/her or your attorney. DO NOT CALL THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK. + +CONTROL NUMBER 415550 + +CHRIS KACHIROUBAS, CLERK OF THE 18TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT © +WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60189-0707 + +### SCHEDULE 'A" + +- I. Any and all documents including but no limited to correspondence and cmalls by/between you and any of the following a meys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment o rtunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) Ber +- d) +- e) c aten +- I) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew 1.1 jk)) t i.Wandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 2. Any and all contacts and/or agreements, in tiduSgRiS drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the follow attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- b) Adler. +- a) +- c) tam W.r c)d PIE twi. +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) Dpvid Roden +- h) Deborah Villages Andrew Barnett euadrey Christina Kitterman + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of e tamer Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation gainst Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) tam.. + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +W:\80743\Schedule A - Discala Subpoena.docx + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS +COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Scott Rothstein, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +2011MR000150 + +Case No.: +status Date: 08/02/11 +Assigned To: 2007 + +![](_page_6_Picture_26.jpeg) + +PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PETITION FOR ORDER +FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENA + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his attorneys [REDACTED] & Bell, Ltd. and pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 204(b), respectfully petitions the court for leave to issue a subpoena for deposition in [REDACTED] County, Illinois, in an action pending in another state. In support of its petition, plaintiff states as follows: + +1. Jeffrey Epstein is the plaintiff in the above captioned matter currently pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXXMB AG. + +2. Plaintiff has retained counsel in both Florida and Illinois, and all counsel is duly licensed under the laws of their respective jurisdictions. + +3. Plaintiff seeks to issue a subpoena for the deposition of Thane Ritchie, who, on information or belief, resides in DuPage County, Illinois. + +4. Pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida, an Order for Commission with Respect to Deposition of Non-Party Witnesses outside Florida is required in order to conduct this discovery. A copy of the Order is attached as Exhibit A. + +2633589 + +5. Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court ule 204(b), attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B is a copy of the r ucstcd subpoena setting forth all relevant information. + +6. In order to facilitate this discovery, laintiff requires the order of this court allowing this deposition to proceed. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ctfully moves for an entry of an ordcr issuing the subpoena and allowing the deposi on of the aforementioned witness. + +> Respe tfully submitted, Jeffre Epstein + +By: + +attorneys + +R Marconi & Bell, Ltd. Suite 2700 33 W. Monroe St. Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 372-0770 Firm ID. 40405 + +U'ye + +### IN TICE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +) Case No.: 20 tI AZ 000150 v. ) i + +) .-• in ) + +icotahavidually, ) VT.,, J. individually, ) g..-C3 a.i , urally, ) + +Defendants. ) + +# ORDER FOR ISSJANCE OFYOREIGN DEPOSMON\_SIJB + +This cause this day having come on for hearing at the request of the Circuit Court of the IS\* District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm 3cach County, Florida compelling the witness, Thane Ritchie be present for his deposition and this Court having found this request well taken directs the clerk of the court of DuPage County, Illinois to issue deposition subpoena compelling Thane Ritchie to be present for his deposition on February 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. ,142/ 33 Wletuee Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +SO ORD K ADJUDGED this the C 14/-3 day of tek3P4friVI 1 + +Ikt. Marconi, Esq. & BELL, LTD. Suite 33 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 372 — 0770 Firm ID. 40505 + +![](_page_8_Picture_17.jpeg) + +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGEtitiP A. SHELDON DEPUTY CLERK + +STATE OF ILLINOIS + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +COUNTY OF DU PAGE + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT + +Jeffrey Epstein, +Plaintiff, + +CASE NUMBER + +-VS- + +Scott Rothstein, Individually, +J. [REDACTED], Individually, +and L.M. Individually, +Defendants. + +File Stamp Here + +SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +To: Thane Ritchie 706 Howard Street, Wheaton, Illinois GREETINGS, + +YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED AND COMMANDED TO APPEAR before a Notary Public at +33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 in Chicago + +Illinois on February 22, 2011 at 9:00 A.M., then and there to submit to a deposition to be taken in a certain cause now pending before this Court, said deposition to be taken upon oral interrogatories propounded by the attorney or attorneys listed. + +YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to bring the following documents or tangible things which constitute evidence relating to said cause and which are listed below; and then and there to testify and speak the truth concerning the same. +See Attached Schedule A + +Supreme Court Rule 204(c). The Discovery Depositions of nonparty physicians being deposited in their professional capacity may be taken only with the agreement of the parties and the subsequent consensus of the deposent or under a subpoena insisted upon order of court. A party shall pay a reasonable fee to a physician for the time he or she will spend testifying at any such deposition. Unless the physician was retained by a party for the purpose of receding an opinion at trial, or unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the fee shall be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken. Supreme Court Rule 203. Unless otherwise agreed, depositions shall be taken in the county in which the deposent resides or is employed or minutes in person, or, in the case of a plaintiff deposent, in the county in which the action is pending. However, the court, in its discretion, may order a party or a person who is currently an officer, director, or employee of a party to appear at a designated place in this State or elsewhere for the purpose of having the deposition taken. The order designating the place of deposition may impose any terms and conditions that are just, including payment of reasonable expenses. + +YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SUBPOENA MAY SUBJECT YOU TO PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT. + +WITNESS: CHRIS KACHIROUBAS, Clerk of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Wheaton, Illinois + +![](_page_9_Picture_61.jpeg) + +Date: Chris Kachiroubas +Clerk of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit + +I served this subpoena by delivering a copy to via process server on [REDACTED] and I paid the witness \$ [REDACTED] for witness and mileage fees. + +Subscribed and Sworn before me +Dated [REDACTED] + +Signature of person making service + +Notary Public +Name: [REDACTED] Marconi +DuPage Attorney No.: 40505 +Attorney for: Plaintiff +Address: 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 +City/State/Zip: Chicago, Illinois 60603 +Telephone: 312-372-0770 + +NOTICE TO WITNESS +The attorney who has requested this subpoena is listed herein. Any questions regarding your knowledge of the subject matter or testimony in the case should be directed to him/her or your attorney. DO NOT CALL THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK. + +CONTROL NUMBER: 415550 + +CHRIS KACHIROUBAS, CLERK OF THE 1ST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT @ +WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60189-0707 + +![](_page_9_Picture_70.jpeg) + +### SCBEDUIEcA" + +- 1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and email by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law fum regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) +- d) eT n +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Mt +- k) illifitandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, inc udi.h.al drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) up a-Adler +- c) amWilm +- e) Michael at d) t') Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden +- h) Deborah +- 1) Andrew Bit Mi llikandrey Christina 1Gitem:tan + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with way of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law titan regarding tiny potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- j) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] Edwards +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- j) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +W:\80743\Schedule A - Discala Subpoena.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12394b3a361d9a01f02ebddbdd6fb79e73282b27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/EFTA02769397.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,711 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 16489, + "elapsed_seconds": 41.82, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_57.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_26.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_17.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_61.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_70.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 330.815, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 330.815, + 127.17 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 455.85699999999997, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 455.85699999999997, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 138.396, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 447.966, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 447.966, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 138.396, + 137.70000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 125.04199999999999, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 457.07099999999997, + 281.07 + ], + [ + 457.07099999999997, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 125.04199999999999, + 294.03 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 245.43 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 256.77 + ], + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 256.77 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE 'A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.8000183105469, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 341.74099999999993, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 341.74099999999993, + 121.20904541015625 + ], + [ + 259.8000183105469, + 121.20904541015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 453.429, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 453.429, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 132.03000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PETITION FOR ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.28699999999998, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 447.3589999999999, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 447.3589999999999, + 298.89 + ], + [ + 146.28699999999998, + 298.89 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN TICE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS \nCOUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 113.0146484375 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 113.0146484375 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 137.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 142.64499999999998, + 137.70000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER FOR ISSJANCE OFYOREIGN DEPOSMON_SIJB", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.72999572753906, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 470.425, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 470.425, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 129.72999572753906, + 295.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.34099999999998, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 377.554, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 377.554, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 220.34099999999998, + 251.10000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCBEDUIEcA\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.582, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 344.3837585449219, + 106.92 + ], + [ + 344.3837585449219, + 120.00653076171875 + ], + [ + 258.582, + 120.00653076171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 96 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 56 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 141 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 57 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 251 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769397" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_3_Picture_57.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_3_Picture_57.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..772304081d7ed26080aaa323d444a4824a814a24 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_3_Picture_57.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3cf242687753ebbaa575b74c6df6edd010a385a78bfc070178b09882ee904636 +size 3656 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_6_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_6_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0a8b2d220ea88ccdeb439207fdbc55db8fcb2a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_6_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dcfa5f37aa709034b0095c7963ec0f4949d1d8393f5177a4c1f23661e0c7daf5 +size 14877 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_8_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_8_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33c2029f086690cff5ff73f89e77065efb763d42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_8_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c6eba86f9ecdd612b13446b93107217e4635cf0266a1e975fc19a416b97b50f +size 10860 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_61.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_61.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecbd805cf97f18739b3883e38e9328751381e6f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_61.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:72a9c764372031edfc792867e8dd5e56563bebe32b2653c44c5baeac3c1fc0f3 +size 3727 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_70.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_70.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..666ebfa944d7ceba3124988b459a4f61c21f9ec9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769397/_page_9_Picture_70.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dc3d170d59537d02b29c852e5df1283d20ee3ed94a52134bde6dc4e30915e98d +size 10681 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e1d355dbca34d49ffc4ea2cabdf8543f72169c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 FEB 11 PM 3:46 +SHARON R. BUCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING- UMC + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has resolved the below motion with counsel for the parties and hereby cancels the following hearing before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED], one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., the following: + +**PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. [REDACTED] in this 9th day of February, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & + +Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, +FL 33409. + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()W:\78880\NOTHRG75-Notice of Cancellation of 2-15-11 Hearing on Epsteins M-Amend-JLA.docx + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e900a54b39e0ab5652826113bbcde529c2759263 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409/EFTA02769409.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769409.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1378, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.01600000000002, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 460.512, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 460.512, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 146.01600000000002, + 72.9 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING- UMC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 156.0, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.664, + 375.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 443.664, + 388.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 156.0, + 388.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.048, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 438.048, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 552.4200000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769409" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd087aa1b1aa870a0b9be2f186701d428c004738 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTI ISTEIN individually and individually, + +Defendants. + +C9 + +4 - • -11 FT% Cf .:•:•.) c) 1I3 --n r rn O. + +## Th PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CONTINUE JURY TRIAL + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure files this his n to Continue. The grounds for this motion are as follows: + +- 1. This case is presen Jury Trial and for Calendar Call on February 25, 2011 with an eight-week docket g March 7, 2011. +- 2. Even thou Honorable Judge Raymond Ray, Bankruptcy Court Judge ordered that a privilege log be prepared by January 31, 2011, the Defendant has not complied with this orde Ot a a proper privilege log has been prepared, time is needed to conduct an incamera d hearings on whether any claimed privileges have been waived or do not exist. As noted the Plaintiffs response to the Defendant, J. Motion for Summary Judgment, discovery has been delayed due to the Plaintiffs inability to obtain documents both from the Defendant and from the bankruptcy trustee. Consequently, only a few + +depositions have been taken. Presently, one deposition has been taken on February 11, 2011. Others are scheduled through February and March 2011. + +4. The trustee in bankruptcy has not produced all records responsive to a subpoena from the Fortress Server System. In addition, there are documents for which the trustee has been ordered to be produced from the Q-Task System and Q-Task has not produced those documents to the trustee. All of these requests are material to the preparation of the Plaintiffs claim and defense of the counterclaim of the Defendant. .. + +5. There are approximately eight thousand (8,000) documen • be subject to the in-camera review. It is not possible within the time left to o ose documents and conduct additional discovery and properly prepare for trial on ntly scheduled docket. + +6. There are presently scheduled hearings a ary 17, 2011, on the Court's UMC calendar, has set his Motion to C or ring the Plaintiff to file his Exhibit List in compliance with the Court's Order Se Tri and Mediation Procedures. On March 30, Assert Claim for Punitive Damages. On March 31, 2011, the Court has special' ,set y Motion for Reconsideration relating to Plaintiff's objections to discovery requests. I• I, 2011, the Court has specially set Epstein's Amended and Supplemental Motion O emile Plaintiffs Objections and Compel Answers to Questions in Deposition. On Aprtl 5, 2011, the Court has specially set Epstein's Motion to Compel/Motion to Determine Privfiege Claims Are Waived. 2011, the Court specially set + +7. The undersigned counsel certifies that the client is in agreement to this Motion for Continuance, and the undersigned will file a consent prior to this motion being set for hearing. + +8. The undersigned counsel certifies that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + +9. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has and will continue to attempt to resolve this matter without the need of a hearing. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile and mailed this // day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +Respectfully submitted, + +JOepK L. Ackerman, Jr. E o. 235954 + +N WHITE BURNETT, P.A. Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 elephone: (561) 802-9044 imile: (561) 802-9976 + +WAR07431MOTCONThEpstein's Motion to Coati \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9096ee1782b35b5b94c84e3717c235de005a15f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411/EFTA02769411.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769411.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3853, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.942, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.4981994628906, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.4981994628906, + 72.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 144.942, + 72.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Th\nPLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CONTINUE JURY TRIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.395, + 298.7493896484375 + ], + [ + 506.63861083984375, + 298.7493896484375 + ], + [ + 506.63861083984375, + 335.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 94.395, + 335.6080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769411" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2628e76a24407f92104a390fdd0b61c37a570fea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the unde set down for hearing before the I lonorable David F. M, one of the Judg bove-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie • th day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +![]()![]()W:\80743\NOTHRG75-NOH on Epstein's Motion to Continue Jury Trial-JLA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de59f78358d6d9c0b33abbc79de136a3c6babf4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414/EFTA02769414.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769414.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1413, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.25, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.942, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.5799865722656, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.5799865722656, + 72.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 144.942, + 72.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 212.541, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 386.106, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 386.106, + 335.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 212.541, + 335.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaint ic erey Epstein's Motion to Continue Jury Trial", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.814, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 449.2004089355469, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 449.2004089355469, + 499.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 149.814, + 499.99249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769414" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2dccae6bb14e341015ce9c7914f642c595f35a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +## TN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +cc, cal on :::r• ca?• r 2:0 l ei + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, r:. J. individually, + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING \ cr 4., PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT"' + +Defendants. + +THIS CAUSE, having come before the Co non to Amend filed on behalf of the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein in the above-styled i \ e. y, parties having agreed to the Motion and the Court having reviewed the Motion ANcLbeiotherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Amend Complaint is Granted. T Pendants shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to file a response, if 1co t ,, Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. + +DO ORDERED this I L., //.,-- day of Palm ty, Florida. , 2011 at West Palm Beach, I + +Copies furnished: All Counsel on attached Service List + +DAVID F. Circuit Judge + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009C/1040800XXXXMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +lack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 C U A Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik S5 + +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8c671d6ffed923c9f7afa7db1e3d41f407a8c24 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416/EFTA02769416.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769416.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1486, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "TN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 321.552, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.639404296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.639404296875, + 115.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 321.552, + 115.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING \\ cr 4.,\nPLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT\"'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.402, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 534.080322265625, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 534.080322265625, + 322.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 108.402, + 322.4830627441406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.796, + 116.92799999999998 + ], + [ + 349.1169128417969, + 116.92799999999998 + ], + [ + 349.1169128417969, + 132.863037109375 + ], + [ + 259.796, + 132.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769416" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f3d7bd7e2153df02992a2c912456d28e176b1fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +/ + +--- + +**MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER** + +Interested Person, ELIZABETH [REDACTED], by and through undersigned [REDACTED] proves this Honorable Court for the entry of a protective order with respect to discovery sought pursuant to the attached Notice and in support would show that the document production described in the Notice is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and unreasonably invades the privacy rights of third-parties. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of March, 2011. + +[REDACTED] JAFFE, WEISSING, +[REDACTED], FISTOS & LEHRMAN, PL +Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) +425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +(954)524-2820 TELEPHONE +(954)524-2822 Fax +[brad@pathtojustice.com](mailto:brad@pathtojustice.com) + +BY: + +![]()[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +Florida Bar No. 542075 +Attorney for Christina Fitch + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +![]()Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN • dividnally, individually, and L.M,, individually, + +Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXlvO3 AO + +# SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITI + +THE STATE OF,FLORIDA: + +TO: Records Custodian, Herb Stettin, Trustee in B p or Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. c/o James C • Etergwrdfingennum, 200 South Biscayne B Suite 1000 Miami, F.G. 331 + +YOU depositions Avenue 1 taking CO of qapar before a person authorized by law to take Mies of Burnett, P.A., Esplrto Santa Plaza, 1395 Brickell ami, FL 33131 on Wednesday, March 16, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., for the sition In this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fait to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +Epstein Rothstein Case No. 502609CA040800XXXX1v1BAG Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RAMC + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless ex from this subpoena by this attotney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on March 4, 2011. + +L. AckerMan, Jr., Esq. + +acl• + +& Eumett, P.A. + +rneys for Pialnie Jejii•ey Epstein + +Espirto Santo Ploza + +1395 Brickell Ayenue, 14th Floor + +Miami, FL 33131, + +Telephone: (305)789-9200 + +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +Epstein v Rothstea Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRR/RC + +EPSTEIN v ROTIISTEINMEI + +#### SCHEDULE "4" + +## DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition: + +Any employment records for the following emplo Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), that shows her full name, residence add number, date of birth, application for employment at RRA, 1-9 fo for insurance benefits, payroll records and pay stubs, all refereneeslemergency contacts which will include names, addresses and telephone numbers and drivers license information and a photocopy of any documents RRA took a photocopy of with picture ID on the following: stein, Rosenfeldt, ep one, social security , W-4 forms, application(s) + +- I. Cara L. +- 2. Jacqui +- 3. Mercedes' +- 4. Elizabeth.Kim +- 5. Christina Fitch • +- 6. Carl Linder +- 7. Jonathanttidanan +- 8. Rob Busthel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2dcbab5ce52512910843e7bee998b8837eca1025 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418/EFTA02769418.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,341 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769418.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 3990, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.356, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.6579999999999, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 542.6579999999999, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 308.356, + 115.01999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "/ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 409.11800000000005, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 409.11800000000005, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 319.14000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.58, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 348.45, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 348.45, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 260.58, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.164, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 434.502, + 347.97802734375 + ], + [ + 178.164, + 347.97802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"4\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.85200000000003, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 358.4827880859375, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 358.4827880859375, + 203.468505859375 + ], + [ + 267.85200000000003, + 203.468505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 120.594, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 422.38199999999995, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 422.38199999999995, + 255.228515625 + ], + [ + 120.594, + 255.228515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769418" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..068cb55ae560742ab754d12378699726ea8776dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and LM , individually, + +Defendant(s). + +#### MOTION FOR PROTECTIV + +Interested Person, CHRISTINA FITCH, b 'ugh undersigned, moves this Honorable Court for the entry of a protective o eCit haspect to discovery sought pursuant to the attached Notice and in support would th the document production described in the Notice is not reasonably calculate to the discovery of admissible evidence and unreasonably invades the privac ig j third-parties. + +# RECEIVED F ING + +MAR 11 + +SHARON/I. BOCK CLERK & COMPTROLLER CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION "era + +I HEREBY CERTIFY e and correct copy of ht e foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all 17pirsel on the attached list, this /...)4A" day of March, 2011. + +> JAFFE, WEISSING, FISTOS lit LEHRMAN, PL Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33301 (954)524-2820 TELEPHONE (954)524-2822 Fax bradGuathtoiustice.com + +Florida Bar No. 542075 Attorney for Christina Fitch + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Protective Order (Stettin) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Burnett,P.A. Jr., p Esquire 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +\*r - + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola 2139 Palm Beach LfCes d. West Palm Beac 33409 & Shipley + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTELN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800VOCCMB AG + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITIOat\$ TECUM + +THE STATE OF,FLORIDA: + +TO: Records Custodian, Herb Stettin, Trustee in B do James C. Cunni Berger &.+-Singerman, 200 South Biscayne B Miami, FL 3313 \ ,04," or Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. Suite 1000 + +YOU ARE COMMA ar before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnet:, P.A., Espirto Santa Plaza, 1395 Brickell Avenue, 141° Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on Wednesday, March 16, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., for the taking afSpt position in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fah to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +it e. + +Epstein v Rothstein!\_ Case No. 502009CA040800X=MBAG Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRR/RC + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. I', + +Dated on March 4, 2011. + +L. Ackert-Jinn, Jr., Esq. + +Esq. + +& Burnett, P.A. + +itorneys or Plcainiff Jeffrey Epstein + +Espirto Santo Plaza + +1395 Brickell Avenue, 14°i Floor + +Miami, FL 33131. + +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +For the Court + +L. t cl, 5c man, + +53 + +r E. Knight, Esq. + +7363 + +Epstein v Rothstea Case No. 502009CA040800XXX.7O,4BAG Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRRIRC + +EPSTEIN v + +### SCHEDULE "A" + +## DUCES TECTIMalerli Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition: C ) + +Any and `all employment records for the following employees R4stein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), that shows her full name, residence address, telephone, social security number, date of birth, application for employment at RRA, 1-9 forms, W-4 forms, application(s) for insurance benefits, payroll records and pay stubs, all references/emergency contacts which will include names, addresses and telephone numbers and drivers license information and a photocopy of any documents BRA took a photocopyof with picture ID on the following: + +- I. Cara L. +- 2. Jacqui +- 3. Mercedes' +- 4. Elizabeth. +- 5. Christina Fitch +- 6. Carl Linder +- 7. Jonathan;Fiirlanan +- 8. Rob Busebel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25f184fda2e641cc0288539f2b6182fdf5ecaa44 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423/EFTA02769423.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769423.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4223, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.19, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIV", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.556, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 410.26200000000006, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 410.26200000000006, + 319.30499267578125 + ], + [ + 197.556, + 319.30499267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RECEIVED F ING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 366.024, + 210.48321533203125 + ], + [ + 532.7763061523438, + 210.48321533203125 + ], + [ + 532.7763061523438, + 229.36260986328125 + ], + [ + 366.024, + 229.36260986328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.01, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.2212829589844, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.2212829589844, + 146.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 261.01, + 146.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITIOat$ TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.42299999999997, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 433.84234619140625, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 433.84234619140625, + 348.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 175.42299999999997, + 348.2235412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.792, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.56048583984375, + 187.92000000000002 + ], + [ + 354.56048583984375, + 203.478515625 + ], + [ + 261.792, + 203.478515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECTIMalerli Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition: C )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 113.928, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 453.72119140625, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 453.72119140625, + 254.8585205078125 + ], + [ + 113.928, + 254.8585205078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769423" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18e6bca660a78cae2d668fd715e50e98059385d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] individually, + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S +CONSENT TO MOTION TO +CONTINUE JURY TRIAL** + +FILED +11 FEB 16 PM 3:20 + +FILED + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Fla. R.Jud.Admin. 2.545 (e), gives his consent to a Motion for Continuance Jury Trial in the above-captioned matter presently scheduled for the eight-week jury trial docket beginning April 25, 2011. + +DATED this 15 day of February, 2011. + +![]()Jeffrey Epstein, +Plaintiff + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile and mailed this 15m day of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack + +Epstein v Rothstein, Edward/Consent +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer +3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 +[REDACTED] E. Knight +Fla. Bar No. 607363 +[REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W:\80743\CONSNT75-Consent of Jeffrey Epstein to Motion to Continue Jury Trial-JLA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d04e91c8ada40cbc06d821eb4a330b2c5b3628f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428/EFTA02769428.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769428.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1621, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.82100000000003, + 59.94 + ], + [ + 465.885, + 59.94 + ], + [ + 465.885, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 163.82100000000003, + 87.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 405.594, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 405.594, + 528.9300000000001 + ], + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 528.9300000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 11 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769428" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2dedc30339df8c608c9e9911b3036316dbf3f94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.md @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE F EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND F R PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +C SE NO.: 502009CA040800X5CXXMBAG + +EFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +s. + +COTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, nd L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +# NOTICE OF TAIUN tr D + +\*Duces Te am + +O: All counsel on the attached Counsel + +LEASE TAKE NOTICE that the un tto eys will take deposition(s) of + +r • I'll ✓ T + +## NAME AND ADDRESS DA AND TIM + +J. ruary 28, 2011 11:00 a.m. + +r C + +## LOCATION + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Ship,ey, PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Duces Teo to have and bring with you at th time of the deposition the following: + +ny and all documents reflecting or relating to s rvices rendered: + +- 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brill i Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. or the benefit of or at the direction of Jeff ey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. + +pon oral examination before a Court Reporter, a otary Public, or any other officer authorized y law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the + +purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 16th day of February 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Court Reporter + +E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED + +AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +Fowler [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..160aeccbb32242961af9f14fa7f66f58be425772 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430/EFTA02769430.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769430.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2991, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.21, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nF EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nF R PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 539.6229999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 539.6229999999999, + 113.67852783203125 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 113.67852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAIUN tr D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.703, + 333.67388916015625 + ], + [ + 400.62, + 333.67388916015625 + ], + [ + 400.62, + 348.43853759765625 + ], + [ + 199.703, + 348.43853759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS DA AND TIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.019, + 451.05389404296875 + ], + [ + 322.62591552734375, + 451.05389404296875 + ], + [ + 322.62591552734375, + 465.05853271484375 + ], + [ + 71.019, + 465.05853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 325.959, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 325.959, + 463.32 + ], + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 463.32 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 420.044, + 450.67388916015625 + ], + [ + 493.9812316894531, + 450.67388916015625 + ], + [ + 493.9812316894531, + 464.67852783203125 + ], + [ + 420.044, + 464.67852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.163, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 378.161, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 66.163, + 430.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 187.563, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 415.795, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 415.795, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 187.563, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 347.8109999999999, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 347.8109999999999, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 86.67 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769430" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cccd8e9aee34b63ff92e562c6ac15ff5eaf4549 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +11 FEB 17 PM 4:21 +JAY BOOK, CLERK +CIRCUIT COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +**\*Duces Tecum** + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition of: + +**NAME AND ADDRESS** + +Donnie D. [REDACTED] + +**DATE AND TIME** + +February 25, 2011 +10:00 a.m. + +**LOCATION** + +Searcy Denney Scarola +Barnhart & Shipley, PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes +Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +**\*Duces Tecum: to have and bring with you at the time of the deposition the following:** + +**Any and all documents reflecting or relating to services rendered:** + +1. 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +2. 2. for the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. + +upon oral examination before a Court Reporter, a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized +by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the + +purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11th day of February 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Court Reporter + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +**AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT** + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +# COUNSEL LIST + +ck A. Goldberger, Esquire oldberger@agwpa.com; ahoney@agwpa.com tterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 50 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 est Palm Beach, FL 33401 hone: (561)-659-8300 ax: (561)-835-8691 ttomeys for Jeffrey Epstein + +armer, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & hrman, PL hone: (954)-524-2820 % 25 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 oil Lauderdale, FL 33301 t / ax: (954)-524-2822 ttomeys for Jeffrey Epstein + +CO + +h L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 01 Point West 77 S Fiagler Drive est Palm Beach, FL 33401-6 hone: (561)-802-9044 ax: (56 I )-802-9976 ttorneys for Jeffrey.Epste + +arc S. Nurik, arc@nuriklaw.co aw Offices of Marc S. Nurik ne E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 oil Lauderdale, FL 33301 hone: (954)-745-5849 ax: (954)-745-3556 ttorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d91828c7d87a0b08c10b343e8547cdd96fb8dc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433/EFTA02769433.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,330 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769433.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3049, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.19, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.714, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.23, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 540.23, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 304.714, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 200.31, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 401.227, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 401.227, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 200.31, + 348.29999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*Duces Tecum", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.224, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 339.92, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 339.92, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 262.224, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.019, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 199.703, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 199.703, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 71.019, + 451.1700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 327.78, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 327.78, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 451.1700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 436.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 451.1700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 377.554, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 377.554, + 430.11 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 430.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.956, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 414.581, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 414.581, + 471.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 186.956, + 471.41999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.119, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.775390625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 350.775390625, + 88.47802734375 + ], + [ + 253.119, + 88.47802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769433" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a2e5ae3f0c43f260374dbd20289308d32fe00ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 FEB 17 2:45 +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER ON DEFENDANT EDWARDS' MOTION TO COMPEL** + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion to Compel Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, to file an Exhibit List in compliance with this Court's Order Setting Jury Trial and Directing Pretrial and Mediation Procedures dated April 10, 2010, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: The Mission is granted to the extent that upon filing of [REDACTED] his Exhibit List, the Plaintiff must specifically + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 17th day of Feb, 2011. + +![]()DAVID F. [REDACTED] +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +*identify individual documents.* + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Jaffe, Weissing, Plates & Lehrman, PL S 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 C O Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +901 Point West 4 L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P . C ) 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +( S" + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Jack Scarola, E Searcy Denn 1. Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Pal es Boulevard West P FL 33409 Phone: 5. -68. .300 Fax: 561 83-9451 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4067de776825eaa044e88937eaa409ef49fbe8b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436/EFTA02769436.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769436.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1925, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.09, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.848, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 542.976, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 542.976, + 109.35000000000001 + ], + [ + 307.848, + 109.35000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EDWARDS' MOTION TO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 130.896, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 473.286, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 473.286, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 130.896, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 352.9582824707031, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 352.9582824707031, + 110.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 110.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769436" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769438/EFTA02769438.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769438/EFTA02769438.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbc4e6faf22e84a2d334e6e95a8fa372cedb38d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769438/EFTA02769438.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +Court will reset the mat At least twenty ( da rior to the Case Management Conference, c unsel shall file an Initial Case Manag ent Statement pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P 014). The ent Conference. trial at the time Case Mana + +DONE, County, Flo° Beach, Palm Beach ERED in C day of Febru West P + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN etc., and J. IMO, etc., + +Defendant(s), + +AO • + +## ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFER + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Plain Jury Trial, and the Court having heard argument of cou advised in the premises, it is hereby tion to Continue d being otherwise fully + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJU and this case is stricken from the March 7, 2 A Plaintiffs Motion is granted ocket. It is further + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Management Conference on Friday, A the Palm Beach County Courthosad < c) Florida. case is scheduled for a Case 011 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9C of North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, + +Copies by mail furnished to: See attached list. + +DAVID F. Circuit Court Judge + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800)COLYMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +e 2280(b)(5)). Before a written objection to a discovery request is ruled upon, the docurnat"Vare not "otherwise discoverable". Gosman at 296. has objected and cliuneathat reviewing and producing the 10,214 pages of requested email is burdensome an has sing. In addition, has objected to this discovery on the grounds that it ser documents that are irrelevant and not calculated to lead to \A \ the discovery of admissible evi,tience. Therefore, the scope of the discovery is at issue. Until the court rules on the request, Defendant does not know what will fall into the category of discoverable docu ents. See Gosman at 296. + +Defe ter-claimant respectfully requests that the Court appoint Robert Carney as a special er to make a report to the Court concerning all objections raised to the second discovery rbquest. Moreover, seeks an order directing Mr. Carney to conduct any incamera review of the 10,214 email and to hold any hearings that he deems necessary to prepare a report addressing the asserted objections. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +WHEREFORE, Defendant/Counter-Claimant respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief: + +- a. Grant this motion for protective order and enjoin the production of any email, documents, or things from Trustee Stettin to Plaintiff in connection with the Trustee Depo Notice; +- b. Sustain Defendant/Counter-Claimant's Objections to discovery and prohibit any discovery from being made, responsive to the Trustee Depo Notice, on this basis; +- c. Appoint Robert Carney as a Special Master to issue a report to the Court on all contested discovery issues; +- d. And to grant such other and further relief as may be deemed just. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 24th day of February, 2011. + +![]()adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMEIAG + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +a Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For. Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., uire Burnett, P. Anon., Je Epste 901 Poin 777 S Flagl West Pal ch L 33401-6170 Phone. ht t -9044 Fax: (56 802-9976 + +sA Co + +From: Charles H. Lichtman (mailto:CLichtman@bergersingerman.Com) + +Gamey; Gary Seth Lehrman To: Lilly Ann Robert + +Sent: Wedni ltruary 16, 2011 10:201 + +Cc: Hmstettin@a south.net + +Subject: MORE DOCUMENTS re Epstein + +As you know, Mr. Epstein's counsel served upon the Trustee a refined email search which sought documents reflecting communications between RRA lawyers and state and /or governmental officials, largely, if not all, lawentorcement officers. I now have a disc of documents for each of you responsive to the subpoena, bate stamped w pages 1 through 10214. I have not reviewed the disc at all, and based upon the search terms, I highly doubt there is anything that could qualify as privileged since the search terms by definition included solely third party communications. Nevertheless, in an abundance of caution, we will review our standard protective order just to make sure t Mate protected. Assuming that to be the case, I intend to then forward to each of you a copy of the disc. + +B I O + +![](_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg) + +## BERGER SINGERMAN "S) attorneys at law + +Charles H Lichtman + +350 East Las Otis Boulevard Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Telephone (954) 525.9900 Fax (9541 523-2872 + +Direct Line 4954) 712-5138 + +E-mail CL' IciLmtmearendiarsiniserman.com l + +WARMS FL Lauderdale DanalS1 www.bergersingernnan.corn + +bp% Please considerfh nvironment before printing this email. + +This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If this information is received by anyone other than the named and intended addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone at the phone number of the sender listed on the email and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s). Thank you. + +\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\*\* \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* \*\*\* + +CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER: This communication does not constitute a "covered opinion" as such term is defined within Circular 230, and does not comply with the requirements for a "covered opinion." We have not conducted, nor have we been asked to conduct, that type of analysis in this communication. To \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/EFTA02769440.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/EFTA02769440.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e618b9bad7eee7068c7e196549fa29df643ffcdf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/EFTA02769440.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 10041, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.67, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER(b IONS TO CANCELLED \nNOTICE OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM 0 RECORDS CUSTODIAN OF \nTRUSTEE HERBERT STETTIN (JANUARY 20. 2011. AND MOTION FOR \nAPPOINTMENT OF ROBERT CARNEY AS SPECIAL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.11999999999999, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 513.8790283203125, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 513.8790283203125, + 407.613037109375 + ], + [ + 97.11999999999999, + 407.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OBJECTI N 'S)S)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 265.428, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.38226318359375, + 343.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 379.38226318359375, + 361.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 265.428, + 361.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.31, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 377.1630859375, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 377.1630859375, + 136.17852783203125 + ], + [ + 233.31, + 136.17852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.732, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 350.3382873535156, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 350.3382873535156, + 137.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 255.732, + 137.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BERGER SINGERMAN \"S) \nattorneys at law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.112, + 328.4112243652344 + ], + [ + 378.29119873046875, + 328.4112243652344 + ], + [ + 378.29119873046875, + 361.08758544921875 + ], + [ + 131.112, + 361.08758544921875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769440" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42934630b1ea2d9b44f295a861aac3928f74530e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769440/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a6af4da20519620155261f389a3794e0500543d83fe73109acfe0bec987d6872 +size 2896 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68e831ce3f98c7b547aa0db2862a530b49bb652a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +FILED +2011 FEB 23 PM 3:15 +SEARCH RECORDS +FILED BEACH COUNTY + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF HEARING (UMC) + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: Wednesday, March 2, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: David F. [REDACTED] + +PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway WPB, FL + +ROOM #: 9C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +**Epstein's Renewed Motion to Appoint Commissioner in New York** + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Krista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355 4380 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing nt via email and U.S. Mail this 92 day February, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Bess La s Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Esquire, Law Offices o S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lau L 33301. + +Respect tted, + +seph L. Acke?man, Jr. a. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. 901 Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +(lat) W: 80743'Diseovery \Evian's NOH on Epstein's Renewed Motion to Appoinuneni Commissioner - New York (2/24/I I-13:54) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09ac5c2bb9a3f0663ee062f00d9e410dbc0032a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447/EFTA02769447.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769447.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2093, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING (UMC)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.37499999999997, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 409.375, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 409.375, + 328.05 + ], + [ + 234.37499999999997, + 328.05 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.375, + 530.55 + ], + [ + 293.75, + 530.55 + ], + [ + 293.75, + 550.8000000000001 + ], + [ + 84.375, + 550.8000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Epstein's Renewed Motion to Appoint Commissioner in New York", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.62499999999999, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 462.49999999999994, + 558.9 + ], + [ + 462.49999999999994, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 115.62499999999999, + 579.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.0, + 181.5 + ], + [ + 404.6402587890625, + 181.5 + ], + [ + 404.6402587890625, + 195.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 240.0, + 195.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769447" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..489b7ab8d75efc495f35cd70211903169a9b1fcd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, EIM, individually, and L.M., J. + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA0408003OCXXMil AG + +PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RENE ON TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER TO TAKE DEPOSITIO 4I ECORDS IN NEW YORK + +Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, files t ih•s hS, wed Motion to Appoint Commissioner for the entry of an Order appointing TSG ReA, 6r any qualified notary public in the State of New York as commissioner wi \* ority to take, report, transcribe and certify the deposition of A.J. Discala to tak e y Plaintiff, pursuant to Fla. Stat. §92.251, the Unifonn Foreign Deposition Act, t d states: ir + +- 1. Th urpo of this deposition is to obtain testimony regarding the witness's knowledge 'ng7lssues pertaining to the subject lawsuit which is likely to lead to the discov ssible evidence in this action. +- 2. Previously, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Commissioner to take depositions in New York. This Court entered an Order granting this motion on January 3, 2011. A copy of said Order is attached hereto as Exhibit "1". +- 3. Plaintiff later discovered that no duces tecum was included after serving the New York Subpoena for Deposition on New York witness, A.J. Discala. Nor was a duces tecum + +and/or Schedule "A" attached to the Notice of Taking Deposition as well. Therefore, the witness is not instructed to bring with him records to his deposition. + +4. In an effort to rectify this issue and have the New York witness 'ng with him records to his deposition, the undersigned is renewing the Motion to Appoi t missioncr so that Plaintiff can re-serve the New York witness with a duces tecum hedule "A". A copy of Schedule "A" for this witness is attached hereto as Exhibit w York counsel who is assisting in this process will prepare the New York subpo tecum upon receipt of this Court's Order on Renewed Motion Appointing Co t n in New York and serve witness, A.J. Discala. + +5. New York law does not auth4ze issuance of a subpoena for the taking of a = ( I deposition unless a commission has been appointed. Accordingly, the Plaintiff moves for the Appointment of TSG Reporti & ng, '747/ 3`d Avenue, 101" Floor, New York, NY 10017, as the commissioner to take the depoNioniduces tecum of A.J. Discala. + +E1\134/ ,..tv WHEREF< ., Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court i grant his Rend ettion to Appoint Commissioner for the grounds set forth above. + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this 091/ 'of February, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm + +Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Esquire, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +rot 777 Sou r r ve, Suite 901 West P ,FL Tel 1) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 ETT P.A. + +bosh) W:180743 on to Appoint Commissioner NY- Discala.wpd(2/24/11•13:32) + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +I + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG + +4,Assc- + +## AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER + +THIS CAUSE, having come on before the Court upon PlaintiffJeffrey Epstein's Motion to Appoint Commissioner, and the Court having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is, + +### ORDERED and ADJUD + +- 1. Plaintiff's Moti point Commissioner in the State of New York is hereby Granted. +- 2. Thefirm Of U.S. Legal Support is authorized to act as commissioner to issue subpoenas, tolake, videotape, report, transcribe and certify the deposition of A.J. DiScala in the above-styled case. + +DONE and ORDERED in , 2010. at West Palm Beach, IFGNED lorida, AND 0I of JAN 03 as + +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +JUDGE DAVID F + +cc: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. One E. Broward Blvd. Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Ackerman, Point- 901-W, 777 S. Flagler Dr. WPB, FL 33401 + +![](_page_3_Picture_19.jpeg) + +### SCHEDULE "A"- A.J. DISCALA + +1. Any and all documents, including but not limited to correspondence and entails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) =Adler +- c) William Ber er +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett .1) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- 1) Christina Kitterman + +Cos + +2. Any and all contracts and/or agree ts, ding all drafts and fmal versions, which were provided to you by any of the fo n omeys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any pot tr ve tment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) i lam Be +- e) Michael +- d) +- f) Ke eth Tenn +- g) Davi n ' drew Barnett Ric d (Ric andrey Christina Kitterman + +3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) IF Adler +- c) lam Ber er +- d) + +![](_page_4_Picture_7.jpeg) + +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boas +- h) Deborah +- i) +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- 1) Christina Kitterman + +4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorne s, employees or agents of the fanner Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Sothstein +- b) Adler \_ ii S +- d) c Sib Cii) +- e) Michael Fisten +- g) David Bo n c +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- i) Arai. \ +- h) Deborah +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey ( S r +- 1) Christina Kitterman + +WAS very\Discala Schedule A - Duces Tecum \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf61fe16faf60dea5b8f41e84031dc05e8358096 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/EFTA02769449.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,387 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 6309, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.35, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_19.jpeg", + "_page_4_Picture_7.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 350.625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 548.7191772460938, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 548.7191772460938, + 130.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 350.625, + 130.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.62499999999997, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 400.11810302734375, + 552.4200000000001 + ], + [ + 400.11810302734375, + 567.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 235.62499999999997, + 567.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 110.625, + 330.82500000000005 + ], + [ + 519.1959228515625, + 330.82500000000005 + ], + [ + 519.1959228515625, + 345.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 110.625, + 345.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDERED and ADJUD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.49999999999999, + 435.6 + ], + [ + 271.25, + 435.6 + ], + [ + 271.25, + 450.2335510253906 + ], + [ + 122.49999999999999, + 450.2335510253906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"- A.J. DISCALA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.75, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 413.1962890625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 413.1962890625, + 87.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 234.75, + 87.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769449" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_3_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_3_Picture_19.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5a02f3e62ad124c094a7526cfddb6c9cf95ff6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_3_Picture_19.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:116dfed746066b72cea85dcad02cec5b4046ef85068e3387f421f29d26fbcef6 +size 9371 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_4_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_4_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3114805823d9f58f4289fa19c16ed444d2092d17 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769449/_page_4_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:18834461cf586be9b1e727d8764a145b50b8033caf2002e3fc2a47a79551981b +size 12109 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..364c79d62a1b4c998e8ef55c970f9d1a6d68bdf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +t, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, (Th, + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF. BRADLEY J. RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, -,J gDWARDS, hereby files his response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as follows: + +- I. Defendant/Counter-plain4Jg,jjWARDS, hereby adopts and incorporates herein by reference his responses to the,Go ai previously filed by the Plaintiff. + +o0 VI -A-O= rn co -.•C.3 fclp CO =DN - n n att + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail t o all c on the attached list, this 28th day of February, 2011. + +O + +, 7, Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 1 440 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for J. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Defendant/Counterplaintiff [REDACTED] Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint +Page 2 of 2 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b5cd740324323cf8f14a8c6d5caad4e2e42497a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455/EFTA02769455.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769455.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1914, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.212, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.1088256835938, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.1088256835938, + 111.80853271484375 + ], + [ + 304.212, + 111.80853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF. BRADLEY J. \nRESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.654, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 455.6559143066406, + 316.71000000000004 + ], + [ + 455.6559143066406, + 345.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 126.654, + 345.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.308, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 346.02599999999995, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 346.02599999999995, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 253.308, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769455" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..faef367941340e6906f2952e54d9efcd83a3569e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.md @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +t + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.I201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +n RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION UCES TECUM + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi take the deposition of: or an attorney of the firm will + +Name: cala + +Date and Time: 'hursday, March 10, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. + +Place: + +V + +Dewey & LeBouef 1301 Avenues of the Americas NY, NY 10010 (212) 259-8000 + +Upon oral exa on before TSG Reporting, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer au, law to take depositions in the State of New York. The oral examination will emit' day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this a3 day of February, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33402 Ord Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E . ward Blvd., Co + +cc: TSG Reporting 747 3rd Avenue,10 NY, NY 1 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +Respectfully submitted, + +Ha. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT P.A. Vpirito Santo Plaza, 14i° Floor 395 Brickell Avenue Florida 33131-3302 ephone: (305) 789-9200 acsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +- I. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- d) +- c) William Be +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, incluS t t drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following a rneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) William Ber er +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) Patrick + - k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey + - I) Christina Kitterman + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) WilliamBerRer +- d) + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitten/Ian + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler Co) d) +- c) W illiam al r. +- h) Deborah AS )49 +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kittennan + +C4 -1CCL + ++'iJ + +PRESENT: PLid4.3 te.° HUFF HON. + +At an Ex-Parte Motion Office at the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York at the Courthouse thereof, located at 80 Centre Street N York, York 10007, on the 13), of 2011. + +LSRALDH: 574411331lenmit SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +x In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY Opp? EPSTEIN, for the issuance of Subpoena for Index No.: 100532111 Ce JEFFREY E S STEIN, ORDER PURSUANT TO IndivIdtlolly, CPLR , 3102(e) Circuit In and for Palm Beach County, Florida \8 1 + +A.J. Di6CALA, to be used in an action entitled individuelly a ., ndivi ua , now pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial + +UPON the reading and fling of the petition of Alison Pighi, Esq. dated January 26. 2011, and the Commission issued by Circuit Judge David F. of the Circuit Court of the I& Judicial Circuit, In and for Palm Beach County, Florida. dated January 3, 2011, authorizing the out-of-state deposition O1A. J. DiSeala; + +NOW, upon the application of Alison Pighi, Esq., dated January 26, 2011, attorney for the petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, it is hereby, + +ORDERED, that the A.J. DiScala, is directed to appear and testify as follows: + +- A.J. DiScala, is directed to appear to testify on February 2e2011, at 11:00 a.m. at the law offices of Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP. 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10271, before + +videographer, Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624-7200, and/or such other dates, times or places to which the same be noticed or continued; further, pursuant to the Subpoena. + +ORDERED, that the personal service of a copy of this Order, together with the Subpoena, upon A.J. DiScala, 303 Park Avenue South, #1401, New York, New York 10010, and service of a copy of the Order and Subpoena by mail or fax on attorneys for all parties in the pending action on or before the 1st day of February, 2011, shall be deemed good and sufficient service. + +ENTER: + +J.S.D. + +CAROL E. HUFF + +FILED + +JAN 28 2011 + +NEW YORK +COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE + +LSK&D #: 574-0133 / 1570166 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +x + +In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for the issuance of Subpoena for Index No.: 100532/11 A.J. DiSCALA, to be used in an action entitled JEFFREY ELITabLtSCSMISTEIN, SUBPOENA individually, J. Individually and L. M. individually, now pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida + +CO AS + +#1401 New York, New York 10010 TO: A. J. DiScala 303 Park Avenue South + +4 C + +WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at the law offices of Lester wab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 1 27 i s, February 22, 2011 at 11:00 a.m., and at any recessed or adjourned date, befo ,deographer, " Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624- 7200, to give evidence and testimony on the part of the plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN relating to the action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually. J. Individually, and L.M. Individually, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMB AG, now pending in the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +Failure to comply with this Subpoena is punishable as a contempt of Court and shall make you liable to the person on whose behalf this subpoena was issued for a penalty not to exceed fifty dollars and all damages sustained by reason of your failure to comply. + +Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2011 + +Yours, etc. + +LESTER SCHWAB KATZ & DWYER, LLP + +- Alison Pighi Attorneys for Petiti + +JEFFREY EPSTEI 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 (212) N-(2:7 + +•:1 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15e7a844eda23fe739ba16e0360db3d4b0e1fe39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457/EFTA02769457.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769457.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 7311, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 328.452, + 87.91199999999999 + ], + [ + 515.0934448242188, + 87.91199999999999 + ], + [ + 515.0934448242188, + 142.10406494140625 + ], + [ + 328.452, + 142.10406494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.769, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 378.182861328125, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 378.182861328125, + 140.35406494140625 + ], + [ + 222.769, + 140.35406494140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.39799999999997, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 349.54095458984375, + 87.588 + ], + [ + 349.54095458984375, + 102.18701171875 + ], + [ + 262.39799999999997, + 102.18701171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769457" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83f1f58fd6b904247cadb423bf4fb49484a0af89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.md @@ -0,0 +1,416 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +![](_page_0_Picture_29.jpeg) + +**RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +**Name:** Michael Legamaro + +**Date and Time:** Friday, March 11, 2011 at 12:00 p.m., CST + +**Place:** +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] +77 W. Wacker Drive, 5th Floor +Chicago, IL 60601-5094 + +Upon oral examination before MADISON DEPOSITION SERVICES, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +ed I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this L.-reday of February, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 334E d Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E '. Bard Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +CO + +cc: Madison Deposition Servicet 1061 West Madison Street Chicago, IL 60607-2050 + +re + +Respect-hilly submitted, + +L A Fla. Bar + +FOWLER BITE BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue iamr, Florida 33131-3302 phone: (305) 789-9200 acsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +#### SCHEDULE "A" + +- 1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and entails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rotlistein +- b) Adler +- d) c +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Etis +- h) Deborah +- i) +- j) tt +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- 1) Christina Kitterman + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, includ) drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Lt Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) Eiipaa Berger +- d) I= Edwards +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David B den +- h) Deborah Richard (Rick) Fandrey Christina Kitterman + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Russell Adler c +- d) ) + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +W:\80743\Schedule A - Discala Subpoena.docx + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS } No. + +v. + +Plaintiff + +Scottr individually, MLE individually, and L.M., dividually + +To: roam Suite 5 lit V r Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 + +Defendant + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +2O11LOOO535 CALENDAR/ROOM A TIME OO:OO Subpoena + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear to give your deposition befbre a Notary Public on February 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at: 33 W. Monroe, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +YOU ARE COMMANDED ALSO to bring the following: + +See attached schedule A + +YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN RESPAKTc i.THIS SUBPOENA WILL SUBJECT YOU TO PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF TB3S COURT. + +JAN 1 1,/ ail r + +UUROWIR, CLERK OF clay + +Clerk of Court + +Atty. No. 06347 Name: I. DR. Marconi Attorney or: efendant Address: 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 City/State/Zip: Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telepbone: 312-372-0770 + +![](_page_4_Picture_21.jpeg) + +I served this subpoena by hand delivery to Michael Legamaro vie process server on + +I paid the witness S for witness and mileage fees. + +Signed and sworn to before me this day of + +DOROTHY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ILLINOIS + +Notary Public + +#### SCHEDULE "A" + +- 1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) 35stliothstein +- b) MI Adler cd) +- c) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) Deborias David +- I) Christina Kitterman +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey + +- \_ +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, inoludinn citafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) tRothstein +- b) Adler cd) +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Bri m +- h) Deborah +- i) 1St +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kittennan + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) . t.othstein +- b) Adler +- d) +- c) itf + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +WA00743\Schedule A - Discala Subpoena.docx + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [REDACTED] COUNTY, ILLINOIS +COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Scott Rothstein, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No.: + +2011L000535 +CALENDAR/ROOM A +TIME 00:00 +Subpoena + +**ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS** + +This cause this day having come on for hearing at the request of the Circuit Court of the 15th District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida compelling the witesses, Thane Ritchie and Michael Legamaro to be present for their depositions and this Court having found this request well taken directs the clerk of the court of [REDACTED] County, Illinois to issue deposition subpoenas compelling Thane Ritchie to be present for his deposition on January 31, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603 and for Michael Legamaro to be present for his deposition on February 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the \_\_\_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_, 2011. + +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +[REDACTED] R. Marconi, Esq. +[REDACTED] & BELL, LTD. +Suite 2700 +33 West Monroe Street +Chicago, Illinois 60603 +(312) 372-0770 +Firm No. 06347 + +JAN 19 2011 + +Chicago - 2538 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPAR , W DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Scott Rottizsig,Wividually, J.M., individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No.: + +rn + +re + +tz=. 20/1L000535 CALENDAR/ROOM A TIME 00:0 ,D SubPoena + +#### PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PETITION FOR ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his attorneys & Bell, Ltd. and pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 204(b), respectfully petition the court for leave to issue subpoenas for depositions in County, Illinois, in an action pending in another state. In support of its petition, plaintiff states as follows: + +- 1. Jeffrey Epstein is the plaintiff in the above captioned matter currently pending in the Circuit Court of the 15\* District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG. +- 2. Plaintiff has retained counsel in both Florida and Illinois, and all counsel are duly licensed under the laws of their respective jurisdictions. +- 3. Plaintiff seeks to issue a subpoena for the deposition of Thane Ritchie at 77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601. +- 4. Plaintiff also seeks to issue a subpoena for the deposition of Michael Legamaro at 77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601. + +2619701 + +5. Pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida, an Order for Commission with Respect to Deposition of Non-Party Witnesses outside Florida is required in order to conduct this discovery. A copy of the Order is attached as Exhibit A. + +6. Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 204(b), attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibits B and C are copies of the requested subpoenas setting forth all relevant information. + +7. In order to facilitate this discovery, plaintiff requires the order of this court allowing these depositions to proceed. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully moves for an entry of an order issuing the subpoenas and allowing the depositions of the aforementioned witnesses. + +Respectfully submitted, +Jeffrey Epstein + +By: + +![]()![]()2619701 + +2 + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ali. COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT,- LAW DIVISION + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +Plaintiff, + +Case No.: + +v. + +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +#### ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS + +This cause this day having come on for hearing at the request of the Circuit Court of the 151b District Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach'County, Florida compelling the wltesses, Thane Ritchie and Michael Legamaro to be present for their depositions and this Court having found this request well taken directs the clerk of the court of County, Illinois to issue deposition subpoenas compelling Thane Ritchie to be present for his deposition on January 31, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603 and for Michael Lcgamaro to be present for his deposition on February 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the day of 2011. + +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +1. , Marconi, Esq. et BELL, LTD. Suite 2700 33 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312)372 — 0770 Firm No. 06347 + +![](_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg) + +eeem enes + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS + +Jcffrey Epstein, + +v. + +Plaintiff + +Scott individually, J. individually, and L.M., Individually + +To: 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 5 Chicago, Illinois 60601 cc) + +Defendant + +No. + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear to give your deposition before a Notary Public on January 31, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at 33 W. Monroe, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +YOU ARE COMMANDED ALSO to bring the following: + +See attached schedule A + +YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN RESPONSE TO THIS SUBPOENA WILL SUBJECT YOU TO PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF TILLS COURT. + +TNESS + +Clerk of Court + +Atty. No. 06347 Name: MINDRespareonl Attorney or: endant Address: 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 Ci tilState/Zip: Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: 312372.0770 + +I served this subpoena by hand delivery to Thane Ritchie via process server on + +I paid the witness S for witness and mileage fees. + +Signed and sworn to before me this day of + +Notary Public + +DOROTHY a, CLERK OF THE CTRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ILLINOIS + +![](_page_11_Picture_23.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein, + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS } No. + +v. + +Plaintiff + +Scott indb4dually, J. ndividnaily, and L.M., Individually + +To: Michael aro 77 West t iler Drive Suite 5 Chicago, Illinois 60601 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to:flipper to give your deposition before a Notary Public on February 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at; 33 W. Monroe, Sults 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60603. + +Defendant + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION + +YOU ARE COMMANDED ALSO to bring the followings + +See attached schedule A + +YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN RESPONSE TO THIS SUBPOENA WILL SUBJECT YOU TO P UNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT. + +Any. Npaa47 Ci Ct Nu mo: R. Marconi NLSIS Attorney fon Decadent Add rent 33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700 City/Stat&72p: Chicago, Minols 60603 Telephone: 312-372-0770 + +Clark of Court + +I served this subpoena by band delivery to Michael Legamaro via process server on + +I poi netts S for wittiest: and mileage fees. + +Signed and sworn to before me this day of + +Notary Public + +DOROTHY =g CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ILLINOIS + +![](_page_12_Picture_24.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc6e92e849c4f4c7e497addd6a307fe6cbdd7086 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/EFTA02769465.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,888 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 13435, + "elapsed_seconds": 57.76, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_29.jpeg", + "_page_4_Picture_21.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_23.jpeg", + "_page_12_Picture_24.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 331.296, + 89.38000000000001 + ], + [ + 516.432, + 89.38000000000001 + ], + [ + 516.432, + 141.86 + ], + [ + 331.296, + 141.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.09799999999998, + 325.5400000000001 + ], + [ + 404.37600000000003, + 325.5400000000001 + ], + [ + 404.37600000000003, + 337.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 196.09799999999998, + 337.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.32999999999998, + 125.86 + ], + [ + 379.682861328125, + 125.86 + ], + [ + 379.682861328125, + 139.34405517578125 + ], + [ + 225.32999999999998, + 139.34405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.80999755859375, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.085, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 344.085, + 118.4495849609375 + ], + [ + 262.80999755859375, + 118.4495849609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS \n} No.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.648, + 80.28375244140625 + ], + [ + 435.9305419921875, + 80.28375244140625 + ], + [ + 435.9305419921875, + 197.683349609375 + ], + [ + 165.648, + 197.683349609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 372.96612548828125, + 223.56000000000003 + ], + [ + 372.96612548828125, + 236.4700927734375 + ], + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 236.4700927734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.6800231933594, + 102.54799999999999 + ], + [ + 342.86699999999996, + 102.54799999999999 + ], + [ + 342.86699999999996, + 115.20458984375 + ], + [ + 261.6800231933594, + 115.20458984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [REDACTED] COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.859, + 103.375 + ], + [ + 448.224, + 103.375 + ], + [ + 448.224, + 126.53099999999999 + ], + [ + 152.859, + 126.53099999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.108, + 267.12100000000004 + ], + [ + 469.53900000000004, + 267.12100000000004 + ], + [ + 469.53900000000004, + 281.18 + ], + [ + 129.108, + 281.18 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY, ILLINOIS \nCOUNTY DEPAR , W DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.12199999999999, + 101.875 + ], + [ + 455.097900390625, + 101.875 + ], + [ + 455.097900390625, + 128.09405517578125 + ], + [ + 157.12199999999999, + 128.09405517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PETITION FOR ORDER \nFOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.25, + 268.95 + ], + [ + 453.57427978515625, + 268.95 + ], + [ + 453.57427978515625, + 294.2240905761719 + ], + [ + 152.25, + 294.2240905761719 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ali. COUNTY, ILLINOIS \nCOUNTY DEPARTMENT,- LAW DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.46800000000002, + 107.31600000000002 + ], + [ + 452.01123046875, + 107.31600000000002 + ], + [ + 452.01123046875, + 132.603515625 + ], + [ + 153.46800000000002, + 132.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 129.108, + 273.981 + ], + [ + 473.994140625, + 273.981 + ], + [ + 473.994140625, + 288.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 129.108, + 288.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.475, + 104.448 + ], + [ + 438.17431640625, + 104.448 + ], + [ + 438.17431640625, + 119.5946044921875 + ], + [ + 167.475, + 119.5946044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 225.21599999999998 + ], + [ + 374.48870849609375, + 225.21599999999998 + ], + [ + 374.48870849609375, + 239.5946044921875 + ], + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 239.5946044921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS \n} No.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.257, + 82.917236328125 + ], + [ + 434.8549499511719, + 82.917236328125 + ], + [ + 434.8549499511719, + 198.54742431640625 + ], + [ + 166.257, + 198.54742431640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.32999999999998, + 225.77500000000003 + ], + [ + 371.49, + 225.77500000000003 + ], + [ + 371.49, + 238.964599609375 + ], + [ + 225.32999999999998, + 238.964599609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769465" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_0_Picture_29.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_0_Picture_29.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c406a34f0fb5c5821cd4d9be20d5e5f0d115b94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_0_Picture_29.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:785e333447997228364340450ca3856b8c2a22ef39d3eb3e0c1228db5bd70b3e +size 10754 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8e054d6c03dcaf527af768800cdc67cf20cd7d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_10_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf02e03b537c382f83f623bd17908812a46b97bc3159dead942757069e560d3c +size 11407 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_11_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_11_Picture_23.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3f875cc30bca1b41f1215c2be15e77b4082d0cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_11_Picture_23.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7a6a88a4300ff3666ba8ff725789435ab464ebe9511041d54ce6e4d934c9a04d +size 10089 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_12_Picture_24.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_12_Picture_24.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58b00ecc8f40bda984633cc258947e9ce611ec8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_12_Picture_24.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:93edec6dfc08e79ea17f0ab9419b1d82ec68d26f020b05e960a203f54a366a25 +size 12042 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_4_Picture_21.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_4_Picture_21.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1522cbaec4c9b184664bdd1b26b01f591d3c0f89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769465/_page_4_Picture_21.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:190abe6c2020f0e379f133f2980c53e85004d0b258748ed4e9b874c7be940994 +size 7696 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e9f637bb70e4335b282790cf53f633a0c9e2dd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1r JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +2011 MAR -2 AM II: 47 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION + +d ifr EG G, Hi i C0UNTY. CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 FL + +CLERK CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION TO APPOIM COMMISSIONER IN NEW YORK + +C', + +THIS CAUSE having come on before the Court 49' t , Jeffrey Epstein's Renewed Motion to Appoint Commission in New York. having agreed to the entry of this Order and the Court having reviewed the moti fr.on nand being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +## ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: + +- 1. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Appoint Commissioner in the State of New York is hereby Granted. +- 2. The firm of Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, 120 Broadway, New York, NY 10271-0071, is authorized to act as commissioner to issue subpoena duces tecum for the deposition of A.J. Discala in the above-styled case. A copy of Schedule "A" identifying all documents requested as part of the subpoena is attac to. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West P Beach County, orida this day of March, 2011. + +Circuit Judge + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXMBAG + +Order on Epstein's Renewed M/Appoint Commissioner in NY + +Page -2- + +Copies Provided to: + +See Service List on next page + +**SERVICE LIST** + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire + +Lilly A. [REDACTED], Esquire + +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esquire + +[REDACTED] & Burnett, P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point, West Tower + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire + +Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik + +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[nat] W:\80743\Discovery\Order on Renewed Motion Appoint Commissioner - New York[3/2/11-8:38] + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +- I. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- d) Wil Berger +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, includital fts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten") 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden- +- h) Deborah i)( Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey 1)= Christina Kitterman + +- 3. Atly and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) W' liam Be +- d) + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Buis +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett :1) En= +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) IME Adler +- d) +- c) William's ME +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett D +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kinerman "is tme \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c2ea560c671c830b1498b05937b2784e5db93d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478/EFTA02769478.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769478.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3813, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.31, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 261.40789794921875, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 261.40789794921875, + 453.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 93.31, + 453.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.43599999999998, + 139.83599999999998 + ], + [ + 337.07700000000006, + 139.83599999999998 + ], + [ + 337.07700000000006, + 153.657 + ], + [ + 248.43599999999998, + 153.657 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 252.65699999999998, + 87.098 + ], + [ + 337.16094970703125, + 87.098 + ], + [ + 337.16094970703125, + 101.8070068359375 + ], + [ + 252.65699999999998, + 101.8070068359375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769478" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769482/EFTA02769482.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769482/EFTA02769482.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9dd3f1919a8e5caeb2584b2939c26a362261722 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769482/EFTA02769482.md @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +Process Server-1 16 + +State of Florida County of Palm Be,ach 15th Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800Y00Cth day of March, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight + +Fla. Bar No. 607363 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point, West Tower + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +cc: Orange Court Reporting +(800) 275-7991 + +cc: Charles Lichtman, Esquire (w/enclosures) + +EPSTEIN v ROTHSTEIN, + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +## DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposi M ' A + +c + +Any and all employment records for the following employees at Ro P.A. ("RRA"), that shows her full name, residence address, tele date of birth, application for employment at RRA, I-9 forms insurance benefits, payroll records and pay stubs, all refe include names, addresses and telephone numbers and • of any documents RRA took a photocopy of with pi Rosenfeldt, Adler, social security number, , application(s) for ency contacts which will information and a photocopy the following: + +- 1. Cara L. +- 2. Jacqui +- 3. Mercedes +- 4. Elizabeth +- 5. Christina Fitch +- 6. Carl Linder +- 7. Jonathan Birkman +- 8. Rob Buschel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769485/EFTA02769485.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769485/EFTA02769485.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf533d5d5acea4f0facec76017a636beb3f7d71f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769485/EFTA02769485.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769485.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2675, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 334.457, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5891723632812, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 532.5891723632812, + 124.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 334.457, + 124.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OF TAKING DEPOSITIO I TECUM* \n1", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.322, + 316.2234802246094 + ], + [ + 455.16937255859375, + 316.2234802246094 + ], + [ + 455.16937255859375, + 344.9845275878906 + ], + [ + 149.322, + 344.9845275878906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.17099999999996, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 353.40850830078125, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 353.40850830078125, + 184.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 255.17099999999996, + 184.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposi M ' A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.724, + 224.37 + ], + [ + 472.3445739746094, + 224.37 + ], + [ + 472.3445739746094, + 240.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 143.724, + 240.3580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769485" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6950564157577afd15a725cfeaca45f967a83f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.md @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +State of Florida County of Palm Beach 15th Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800)00O(MB AG Court Date: 2/28/2011 11:00 a rrili + +Plaintiff: JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +vs. + +Defendant: + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually + +For: + +Jack Scarola + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +![](_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg) + +Received b Rock L al Services & Investigations Inc on the 17th day of February, 2011 at 11:27 am to bebrved on J. c/o The Wackenhut Corporation, 4200 Wackenhut\*, Suite 100, Palm Beach Gar ens, 1 + +I, James Cain, do hereby affirm that on the 28th day of February, 2011 .32 am, I: + +) 14/ \ works out in the field and is never in the,office. I was not provided an alternate address prior to the court date. James Cain + +NON-SERVED - DILIGENT: after due search careful inquiry and dil nt attempts was unable to serve the Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition on J. do The Wackenhut Corporation for the reasons detailed in the comments below. + +## Additional Information pertaining to this Service: + +I attempted the provided address of 4200 Wackenhut Drive, Suite 100, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-4242 and it was found to be vacant. The subject company had moved to 1395 University Drive, Jupiter, FL where I also attempted service. I was advised at that location that the-subject does not work at this address that he is at 11360 North Jog Road, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I attempted that address and they advised me that the subject + +Under penalties of perjury. I declare th have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true. I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the county in which service was effe ed in accordance with State Statutes. + +Process Se r-1216 + +Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc 2048 Ponce De Avenue West Palm Beac 33407 (581) 296-7574 + +Our Job Serial Number: ROC-2011003057 Ref: 291874 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. and L.M., Individually, individually, + +Defendants. + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +'1•,7 ry- • ) ) + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR SIT1ON + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: J. do The Wackenhut Corpora 4200 Wackenhut Drive Suite 100 Palm Beach Gardens, 242 + +YOU ARE CO D to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the c ces dersigned counsel on Monday, February 28, 2011, at 11:00 am, for the takin ur position in this action. You are to have with you at the above place and time the fo + +## D ES TECUM: + +Any and all documents reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +- I. At or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. For the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger, Esquire. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMEAG + +Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition - + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED this Rotbday of February 2011. + +Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant + +a f of the Court 7 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad03a7e5af966225775754ff694b102c919f8edd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/EFTA02769488.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3519, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.34, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.676, + 17.009999999999998 + ], + [ + 399.6772766113281, + 17.009999999999998 + ], + [ + 399.6772766113281, + 34.39593505859375 + ], + [ + 209.676, + 34.39593505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Service:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.298, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 280.76611328125, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 280.76611328125, + 397.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 50.298, + 397.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR SIT1ON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.68, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 440.90478515625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 440.90478515625, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 169.68, + 340.2 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D ES TECUM:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.02000000000001, + 583.2 + ], + [ + 200.7318115234375, + 583.2 + ], + [ + 200.7318115234375, + 600.8625030517578 + ], + [ + 103.02000000000001, + 600.8625030517578 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769488" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70f73f9cc296e9de17760f6aa47dbecd2779b26c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769488/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b6f352bd119f2c55ddafb34f5c9865425253afa95666beda2fd9c52d47df95e8 +size 10305 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..556724464343062efbabb32e332565936094cd47 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.md @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +E + +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. xx, re,.3 O m C + +## RE—NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM (LOCATION CHANGE) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: . Discala + +Date and Time: Thursday, March 10, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. + +Place: Burnett, P•A. Espirito Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 1.1th Floor Miami, FL 33131 + +Upon oral j on before HI-TECH/UNITED REPORTING, INC., Notary Public, or any other not Ite or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this ft day of March, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, orneys for J. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, 4091ttd Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, froward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +cc: Hi-Tech/U Repof ' g, Inc. 10890 N Miami, L 3)161-7219 (305t899-0075 iv'S/ unitedrenorting.net + +Respectfully sub + +Fl 35954 Jr. + +BURNETT P.A. 'to Santo Plaza, 14° Floor 95 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-3302 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +SCHEDULE "A" + +1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, including all drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) DeborahM 9 Andrew Barnett +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys), erhployees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- d) +- c) +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Bodcn +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +At an Ex-Parte Motion Office at the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York at the Courthouse thereof, located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, on the 20th day of January, 2011. + +PRESENT: CAROLE HUFF + +HON. + +LSK&D #: 574-0133 / 1570111 + +SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK +COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for the issuance of Subpoena for A.J. DiSCALA, to be used in an action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Individually and L. M., individually, now pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida + +*Handwritten signature and stamp:* +FILED +JAN 26 2011 +NEW YORK +COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE + +Index No.: 100532/11 + +ORDER PURSUANT TO +CPLR § 3102(e) + +UPON the reading and filing of the petition of Alison Pighi, Esq. dated January 26, 2011, and the Commission issued by Circuit Judge David F. [REDACTED] of the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, dated January 3, 2011, authorizing the out-of-state deposition of A. J. DiScala; + +NOW, upon the application of Alison Pighi, Esq., dated January 26, 2011, attorney for the petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, it is hereby, + +ORDERED, that the A.J. DiScala, is directed to appear and testify as follows: + +- • A.J. DiScala, is directed to appear to testify on February 22, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. at the law offices of Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10271, before + +videographer, Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624-7200, and/or such other dates, times or places to which the same be noticed or continued; further, pursuant to the Subpoena. + +ORDERED, that the personal service of a copy of this Order, together with the Subpoena, upon A.J. DiScala, 303 Park Avenge South, #1401, New York, New York 10010, and service of a copy of the Order and Subpoena by mail or fax on attorneys for ail parties in the pending action on or before the 1.06 day of r oil, shall be deemed good and sufficient service. + +ENTER: + +JAM). + +(c\r CAliCis. E. HUFF + +CHC)\* + +fr / + +as 4%4;4447/1 + +x + +In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for the issuance of Subpoena for Index No.: 100532/11 A.J. DiSCALA, to be used in an action entitled JEFFREY E •STEIN v. SC STEIN, SUBPOENA individually, MIN J. Individually and L. M. individually, now pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida + +TO: A. J. DiScala 303 Park Avenue South #1401 New York, New <<;\' York 10010 + +WE COMMAND YOU, that all Wein p and excuses being laid aside, you appear at the law offices of Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10271, on February 22, 2011 at 11:00 a.m., and at any recessed or adjourned date, before videographer, Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624- 7200, to give evidence and testimony on the part of the plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN relating to the action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, ina Individually, and L.M. Individually, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMB AG, now pending in the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +Failure to comply with this Subpoena is punishable as a contempt of Court and shall make you liable to the person on whose behalf this subpoena was issued for a penalty not to exceed fifty dollars and all damages sustained by reason of your failure to comply. + +Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2011 + +Yours, etc. + +LESTER SCHWAB KATZ & R, LLP + +IGwe- + +"Alison Pighi Attorneys for Pet 'onefi JEFFREY EPSTEIN 120 Broadway New York, New York (21c, 67 10271 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a56e83c82d08e6ffa82fcb2f837d3d41322e86a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491/EFTA02769491.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,362 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769491.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 7583, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE\u2014NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM \n(LOCATION CHANGE)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.942, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 458.702392578125, + 322.38 + ], + [ + 458.702392578125, + 352.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 144.942, + 352.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.12699999999998, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 384.01812744140625, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 384.01812744140625, + 154.61749267578125 + ], + [ + 219.12699999999998, + 154.61749267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.54299999999995, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 357.52299999999997, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 357.52299999999997, + 96.38999999999999 + ], + [ + 272.54299999999995, + 96.38999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769491" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06360794b1ff3773195c3e36ce09e4ce0b8683dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +2014 MAR 11 PM 4:02 +FRANKLIN BEACH CIVIL +CIRCUIT COUNTY + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +**DATE:** Tuesday, March 30, 2011 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. ██████████ (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +**PLACE:** 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Motion for Protective Order (Deposition of Herbert Stettin) + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has ished by 4 - Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of + +s)\* + +JACK SCA Florida itjp.. •440 Searcy/De ey,)Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 21 9 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard almtBeach, Florida 33409 (561) 686-6300 cT (5S-9451 omey for J. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-617 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Ma S. N k One E Broward Sui 700 Fort Lauderda L • 01 Phone: (954) Fax: (954 + +A \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a85fc0e10fbbd87e2e6eba1a20cf4954b5f425d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499/EFTA02769499.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769499.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2209, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.516, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 366.02099999999996, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 366.02099999999996, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 235.516, + 360.45000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 276.185, + 565.3799999999999 + ], + [ + 276.185, + 579.15 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 579.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.52, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 348.8382873535156, + 143.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 254.52, + 143.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769499" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc0ea98fd4f047323989fee1db39c9ca2dd48cf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.md @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +#29I874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +# MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORQER + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, the entry of a protective order with respect to sought pursuant to the attached Notice and in support would show that the ume production described in the Notice is not reasonably calculated to lead to th o y of admissible evidence and unreasonably invades the privacy rights of third-parti moves this Honorable Court for + +t, I HEREBY CER that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mai all Co nsel on the attached list, this i day of March, 2011. +0 + +fen .5. L 7." :BCC c•••• o 1 r --ri int ;) O (arca 4: s\_iir • e t 1%) + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 16 440 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (5S-9451 Attorney for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +[REDACTED] Motion for Protective Order (Stettin) + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +v. + +Plaintiff, + +THSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXVIE AG + +# NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION/DUCESTECUM\* + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of the following deponent and this deponent is to bring with him the following records on attached Duces Tecum on Schedule "A" + +Name: Records Custodan, c "--."s• Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RDA + +Date and Time: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. + +Place: Burnett, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 + +Upon oral before ORANGE COURT REPORTING, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this 4th day of March, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight + +Fla. Bar No. 607363 + +[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +cc: Orange Court Reporting +(800) 275-7991 + +cc: Charles Lichtman, Esquire (w/enclosures) + +**EPSTEIN v ROTHSTEIN, [REDACTED]** + +**SCHEDULE "A"** + +**DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition:** + +Any and all employment records for the following employees at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), that shows her full name, residence address, telephone, social security number, date of birth, application for employment at RRA, I-9 forms, W-4 forms, application(s) for insurance benefits, payroll records and pay stubs, all references/emergency contacts which will include names, addresses and telephone numbers and drivers license information and a photocopy of any documents RRA took a photocopy of with picture ID on the following: + +1. 1. Cara L. [REDACTED] +2. 2. Jacqui [REDACTED] +3. 3. Mercedes [REDACTED] +4. 4. Elizabeth [REDACTED] +5. 5. Christina Fitch +6. 6. Carl Linder +7. 7. Jonathan Birkman +8. 8. Rob Buschel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbec1281f0824c273a375234b2f4d1587956fe72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502/EFTA02769502.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769502.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4755, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.62, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.714, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 528.7593994140625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 528.7593994140625, + 114.35302734375 + ], + [ + 304.714, + 114.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORQER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.1178894042969, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 409.1178894042969, + 334.113037109375 + ], + [ + 196.66799999999998, + 334.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 347.20399999999995, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 347.20399999999995, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 331.482, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 516.2120361328125, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 516.2120361328125, + 138.978515625 + ], + [ + 331.482, + 138.978515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION/DUCESTECUM*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.984, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 444.77740478515625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 444.77740478515625, + 336.2285461425781 + ], + [ + 159.984, + 336.2285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.0249999999999, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.0249999999999, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 198.45000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.785, + 234.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 234.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 452.21500000000003, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 154.785, + 251.10000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769502" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aebd2bbb84c6f084af85a5c10c756ddf821779e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.md @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +## IN THE Circui tCOURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR Palm Beach . COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Jeffery Epstein Plaintiff + +VS. + +Defendant + +Case No.S0 2009CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +Division + +## VERIFIED MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDIC ADMINISTRATION 2.510 + +Comes now\_ . Weinberg \ herein, and respectfully represents the followin : c,I. [ I Movant resides in Newton .1. . Movant A\ Movant + +s.,S , trme (State) + +is not a resident of the State .° . + +[ Movant is a resident of the State of Florida and has an application pending for admission to The Florida Bak and llasrnot previously been denied admission to The Florida Bar. + +2. Movant is an attome and a member of the law firm of (or practices law under the name of) a erg, P . C . , with offices at 20 Par Plaza Suite 1000 Boston + +et Address) (City) , 02116 , (617) 227-3700 . (State) (Zip Code) (Telephone) Suf f + +—o •.. + +ovant has been retained personally or as a member of the above named law firm on ch, 2011 by Jeffery Epstein (Date Representation Commenced) (Name of Party or Parties) + +to provide legal representation in connection with the above-styled matter now pending before the above-named court of the State of Florida. + +4. Movant is an active member in good standing and currently eligible to practice law in + +the following jurisdiction(s): Include attorney or bar number(s). (Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +JURISDICTION + +Massachusetts + +ATTORNEY/BAR NUMBER + +28134 + +--- + +--- + +--- + +--- + +5. There are no disciplinary proceedings pending against Movant, except as provided below (give jurisdiction of disciplinary action, date of disciplinary action, nature of the violation and the sanction, if any, imposed): + +(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +--- + +--- + +--- + +--- + +--- + +6. Within the past five (5) years, Movant has not been subject to any disciplinary proceedings, except as provided below (give jurisdiction of disciplinary action, date of disciplinary action, nature of the violation and the sanction, if any, imposed): + +(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +--- + +--- + +--- + +--- + +--- + +7. Movant has never been subject to any suspension proceedings, except as provided below (give jurisdiction of disciplinary action, date of disciplinary action, nature of the violation and the sanction, if any, imposed): + +(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +8. Movant has never been subject to any disbarment proceedings, except as proyided below (give jurisdiction of disciplinary action, date of disciplinary action, nature oftheviolation and the sanction, if any, imposed): + +(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +9. Movant, either by resignation, withdra', hr Soirerwise, S never has terminated or attempted to terminate Movant's office as an attorney in order to avoid administrative, disciplinary, disbarment, or suspension proceedings. + +' + +10. Movant is not an inactive member of The Florida Bar. + +/ 11. Movant is not now a member of The Florida Bar. + +12. Movant is not a suspended member of The Florida Bar. + +13. Movant is not a disbarred member of The Florida Bar nor has Movant received a disciplinary resignation /from The Florida Bar. + +14. Movant has not previously been disciplined o-held in contempt by reason of misconduct committed while engaged in representation pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510, except as provided below (give date of disciplinary action or contempt, reasonsthere for, and court imposing contempt): + +(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +15. Movant has filed motion(s) to appear as counsel in Florida state courts during the past five (5) years in the following matters: (Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) + +Date of Motion Case Name Case Number Court Date Motion Granted/Denied + +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ +\_\_\_\_\_ + +16. Local counsel of record associated with Movant in this matter is +██████████ Ackerman 235954 who is an active member in good standing of The Florida +(Name and Florida Bar Number) + +Bar and has offices at 777 s. Flagler Drive Suite 901 - West Tower, +(Street Address) +West Palm Beach, Florida +(City) (State) 33401 +(561) 802-9044 +(Telephone with area code) + +(If local counsel is not an active member of The Florida Bar in good standing, please provide information as to local counsel's membership status. \_\_\_\_\_) + +17. Movant has read the applicable provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510 and Rule 1-3.10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and certifies that this verified motion complies with those rules. + +18. Movant agrees to comply with the provisions of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and consents to the jurisdiction of the courts and the Bar of the State of Florida. + +WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully requests permission to appear in this court for this cause only. + +DATED this 10 day of March, 2011. + +*McBully* +Movant + +20 Park Plaza +Address + +Suite 1000 +Address + +Boston, [REDACTED] 02116 +City, State, Zip Code + +(617) 227-3700 +Telephone Number + +STATE OF Massachusetts + +COUNTY OF Suffolk + +I, [REDACTED] Weinberg do hereby swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that I am the Movant in the above-styled matter; that I have read the foregoing Motion and know the contents thereof, and the contents are true of my own knowledge and belief. + +*[Handwritten signature]* +Movant + +I hereby consent to be associated as local counsel of record in this cause pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510. + +DATED this 14th day of March, 2011. + +*Mary H. Babb* + +*[Handwritten signature]* +Local Counsel of Record + +777 South Flagler Drive +Address + +Suite 901 West Tower +Address + +*[Handwritten notes]* +5 (561) 802-9044 +File (561) 802-9976 +Ext BAN No: 235954 + +**MARY H. BABB** +NOTARY PUBLIC +Commonwealth of Massachusetts +My Commission Expires +June 21, 2013 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abc5ebebf88213cac1ae969ac2acac980e879842 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507/EFTA02769507.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769507.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 5884, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE Circui tCOURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, \nIN AND FOR Palm Beach . COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.44, + 116.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 478.3594665527344, + 116.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 478.3594665527344, + 144.33056640625 + ], + [ + 145.44, + 144.33056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "VERIFIED MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE \nPURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDIC ADMINISTRATION 2.510", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.22999999999999, + 317.06 + ], + [ + 496.6603698730469, + 317.06 + ], + [ + 496.6603698730469, + 343.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 124.22999999999999, + 343.4505615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Form", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 43 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769507" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04e48f93ccbef7f27687c6f031f9057c18b8ad59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +=, I + +a + +-tp + +IV + +to + +MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDEJR ERBERT STETTIN, TRUSTEE + +-n r m + +Herbert Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee of Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler, P.A., ("RRA") hereby moves for a Protective Order as to a S9bp,oena issued upon him for records to be produced by / March 16, 2011 and states: + +I. First, jurisd over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District lorida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 3479I-BKC- is Court has effectively recognized as much in a prior subpoena issued upon M RRA's Trustee. Moreover, the Duces Tecum portion of this Subpoena seeks the confidential employment records of eight RRA employees. The Trustee believes that the information requested is not only confidential, but has absolutely nothing to do with the claims pending in this lawsuit. Accordingly, the Trustee asks that this Court defer ruling on this matter to Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray, the presiding judge in the RRA bankruptcy, who has + +asserted jurisdiction over this issue, given that it affects RRA employees, and that a Protective Order be entered in this cause. + +BERGER SINGERMAN + +Attorneys for Trustee + +350 East Las Olas Boulevard — Suite 1000 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Telephone: (954) 525-9900 + +Direct: (954) 712-5138 + +Facsimile. (954) 523-287 + +By: + +cc% Char Flo CLi + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVJa + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct Mail and facsimile on Mr. Robert D. Crifton, r. an Critton Luttier & Coleman, 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach r. arc Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite uderdale, FL 33301; Mr. Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., We ach, FL; Mr. Gary , Esq., Jaffe Weissing, et al., 425 N. Andre e., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Mr. Jack Goldberger, Esq., rb oldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, F 4 012; and to Rodney Janis, Esq., =, Burnett, P.A., Point, Wes o 77 S. Flagler Dr., Ste 901, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; and to L. Acke Jr., Esq., Lilly M, Esq. and Knight, Esq., Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14 Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on this \ 4 14/ day of March, 2011. foregoing was served by U.S. + +3525056-I + +ichtrnan \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..653de3ccf0b4a43aba3cde1a2c662058582f2312 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512/EFTA02769512.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769512.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2519, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.006, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 516.7593994140625, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 516.7593994140625, + 117.363037109375 + ], + [ + 278.006, + 117.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVJa", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.271, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 376.4831848144531, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 376.4831848144531, + 322.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 214.271, + 322.4830627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769512" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12d3aa8c97cb60371bfbd168a346322d2ad3fae6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.md @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. , individually, and individually, Defendants. + +I + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXWB AG + +;- ZCD Mr . / 22 a -n + +## NOTICE OF HEARING (MOTION CALENDAR) + +TO: See attached Service List + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the above the above-named Court to whom the case was assi Courthouse, located at 205 North Dixie Highw s Ste st alm Beach, Florida as follows: c be heard before the Judge of at the Palm Beach County + +DATE: March 28, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: David + +ROOM: 9C + +SPECIFIC MATT BE HEARD: + +## MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR HERBERT STETTIN, TRUSTEE + +I H Y ERTIFY that a bona fide effort has been made prior to the filing of this Notice g to resolve the matters set for hearing herein. + +BERGER SINGERMAN + +Attomeys for Herbert Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee 350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Direct: (954) 712-5138 Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 + +,/ ich'ttfian, Esq. + +No. 501050 an@bergersingerman. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the for fumished by facsimile and by U.S. Mail this\^ay of March, 2011 to he aboye- fere,ced addressee. + +By: + +tchtman, Esq. + +If you are a penou with a disability who needs any aceommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certalu asslstance. Please contact Nicole Saunders ADA Coordinator in the Administrative Office of the Court, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; telephone number (561) 355-4380 within two (2) working days of your receipt of this Notice of Hearing; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 1-800-955- 8771. + +Si Usted es una persona incapacitada que necesita de un servicio especial para participar en este proceso, Usted tiene derecho a que le provean cierta ayuda sin costo alguno. Por favor pongase en contacto con el Coordinador de la Oficina Administrativa de la Corte ADA, situada en el 205 North Dixie Highway, Oficina 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, teléfono (561) 3554380, dentro de los dos (2) próximos días hábiles después de recibir esta Notice of Hearing; si tiene incapacidad de oir 6 hablar llame al 1-800-955-8771. + +Si ou sé yon moun ki Infim, ki bézwen nimpôt akomodasyon pou ka patisipé nan pwosè sa-a, ou gen dwa, san'l pa kouté'w anyin, pou yo ba'w kék sévis. Tampri konlakté ko(idinatê ADA ya nan Biro Administratif Tribinal nan cité Palm Beach la, ki nan 205 North Dixie Highway, Cham 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, niméro téléfonn-nan sé (561) 355-4380, rélé dé (2) jou dé lê ou résévwa Notice of Hearing; si ou bêbê ou byen soud rélé 1-800-955-8771. + +Si vous ¿tes infirme, et en besoin de n'importe accommodation pour pouvoir participer à ces procédures, vous pouvez gratuitement recevoir certains services. S'II vous plait contacta le coordinateur du Bureau Administratif du Tribunal de Palm Beach, située à 205 North Dixie Highway, Chambre 5.2500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, numéro de téléphone (561) 355-4380 durant deux (2) jours suivant la réception de Notice of Hearing; si vous ¿tes muets ou sourds, appelez 1-800-955-87 + +35a1417.1 + +**SERVICE LIST** + +**Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] and L.M. +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG** + +Mr. Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. +Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman +303 Banyan Boulevard +Suite 400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Mr. Marc Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Mr. Jack Scarola, Esq. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Mr. Gary [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing, et al. +425 N. Andrews Avenue +Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Mr. Jack Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger et al. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Mr. Rodney Janis, Esq. +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett P.A. +[REDACTED] Point, West Tower +777 S. Flagler Drive +Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman Jr., Esq. +Lilly [REDACTED], Esq. +[REDACTED] Knight, Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +1395 Brickell Avenue +14th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfdd262e695dc7c1c3ddff4e5e1e9bc6988f04d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514/EFTA02769514.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769514.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4373, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH\nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 303.5, + 48.599999999999994 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 48.599999999999994 + ], + [ + 528.697, + 93.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 303.5, + 93.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING \n(MOTION CALENDAR)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.66, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 366.3563232421875, + 251.10000000000002 + ], + [ + 366.3563232421875, + 279.6035461425781 + ], + [ + 230.66, + 279.6035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR HERBERT STETTIN, TRUSTEE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.62199999999999, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 507.36590576171875, + 522.45 + ], + [ + 507.36590576171875, + 536.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 88.62199999999999, + 536.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.52, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 341.78399999999993, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 341.78399999999993, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 254.52, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769514" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5049fe2545b7e1804d37ddd3e5fcb0d4c2904672 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB ACr + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION- DUCES TECUM\* + +\S - + +c PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the d e84c, si low is cancelled as a result of a Motion for Protective Order and Notice of He or 3 0/3011 at 8:45 a.m., filed by Jack Scarola, as counsel for Defendant, + +c-3 .5 -. 0 A\ + +• + +Name: Records Custodan, Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA + +Date and Time: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. + +Place: c is) + +"HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this 15th day of March, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, + +Burnett, P.A. Espirito Santo Plan 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 + +FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +cc: Orange Court Reporting is telephone email cxl) (800) 275-7991 + +cc: Charles Lichtman, via facsimile and US Mail) + +?S' + +[nail W:18074 Cancellation of Re-NTD DT RC.-Herb Stettin. Trustee RRA • RRA Employee Employment records + +1-v-A"-Cd L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Ha. Bar No. 235954 + +E. + +Ha. Bar No. 6 + +BURNETT P.A. + +901 Point, West Tower + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3a9b0a030c3c2492bc97e34f1199f4e68fbf690 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517/EFTA02769517.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769517.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1641, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.19, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 331.482, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.87158203125, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.87158203125, + 129.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 331.482, + 129.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION- DUCES TECUM*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.53399999999999, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 487.73699951171875, + 335.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 487.73699951171875, + 351.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 114.53399999999999, + 351.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769517" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..548839514f5c026f8a0c317bafc1c63fdb0442e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.md @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +State of Florida County of Palm Beach Circuit Court + +Case Number: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB-AG Court Date: 3/16/2011 11:00 am + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and L.M., individually, J. EDWARD, individually, + +For: David P. Ackerman. Esquire Ackerman, Link 8 Sartory, P.A. 222 Lakeview Avenue . Suite 1250 • West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Received by Process Service, Inc. on the 4th day of March. 2011 at 9:00 am to be served on Records Custodian Herb Stettin Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. c/o James C. Cunningham, Jr., Berger & Singerman, P.A., 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000, Miami, FL 33131. + +lidefonso, Sr..do hereby affirm that on the 7th day of March, 2011 at 3:00 pm, I: + +served an AUTHORIZED individual by delivering a true copy of the Subpoena for Deposition Duces Tecum and Schedule "A" with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Charles H. Lichtman Esquire as Authorized to Accept at the address of: Herb Stettin, 2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3700, Miami, FL, who stated they are authorized to accept service for Herb Stetting and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes. \*N. + +Under penalty of perjury. I declare that I hay oregoing Return of Service and that the facts stated in it are true. + +Additional Infomtation, pertaining to tike Seryi e: + +At address given - 200,South Biscayne Bled,-Suite 1000, Miami - advised that James Cunningham is not authorized to accept Subpoena. Client provi second address which is Herb Stettin's office. 2 S. Biscayne Blvd., 1 Biscayne Tower, Suite 3700. Miami - but he t in the office and was travelling via plane. His office staff advised that Subpoena needs to be served to C rtes Lichtman, Esquire, Berger & Singerman, PA, 350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1000. Ft. Lauderdale. - + +I do hereby certify t interest in the above action, that I am over the age of eighteen, and that I am a Certified Process •ood standing in the circuit in which it was served. + +Process Service, Inc. 378 Northlake Blvd. No. 263 North Palm Beach, FL 33408 (561) 881-1442 + +Our Job Serial Number: WPS-2011002716 + +t + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION CUM + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Records Custodian, Herb Stettin, Trustee in B tc or othstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. do James C. Cunningham. Berger & Singerman, P. 200 South Biscayne Bo vary, Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33131 + +C + +o + +YOU OMMANDED to a ar before a person authorized by law to take depositions at ices of Burnett, P.A., Espirto Santa Plaza, 1395 Brickell Avenue, 1 th oor, Miami, FL 33131 on ednesday, March 16, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., for the taking o sition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +Epstein v Rothstein/a Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRRJRC + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on March 4, 2011. + +For the Court + +a . Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Lit Ann Esq. & Burnett, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +By: + +ckerMan, Jr., q 4 Knight, Esq. + +Epstein v Rothstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAO Subpoena DT/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRR/RC + +EPSTEIN v ROTHSTEIN, + +### SCHEDULE "A" + +# DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition: + +Any and all employment records for the following employees Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), that shows her MI name, residence addre le number, date of birth, application for employment at RRA, Ifor insurance benefits, payroll records and pay stubs, all re will include names, addresses and telephone numbers photocopy of any documents RRA took a photocopy tein, Rosenfeldt, e, social security W-4 forms, application(s) ergency contacts which icense information and a tore ID on the following: + +- 1. Cara L. +- 2. Jacqui +- 3. Mercedes +- 4. Elizabeth +- 5. Christina Fitch +- 6. Carl Linder +- 7. Jonathan Birkman +- 8. Rob Buschel + +÷os \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f07099d9314493c124bbad8e3ee23279f20d2791 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519/EFTA02769519.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769519.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4484, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.09, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 29.46331787109375 + ], + [ + 377.09466552734375, + 29.46331787109375 + ], + [ + 377.09466552734375, + 45.8994140625 + ], + [ + 220.94799999999998, + 45.8994140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.79248046875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 538.79248046875, + 117.11749267578125 + ], + [ + 290.14599999999996, + 117.11749267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION \nCUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.925, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 435.3854675292969, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 435.3854675292969, + 339.85748291015625 + ], + [ + 166.925, + 339.85748291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.344, + 188.183 + ], + [ + 351.15704345703125, + 188.183 + ], + [ + 351.15704345703125, + 204.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 253.344, + 204.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM/Herb Stettin, Trustee RRA/RC Deposition:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.09400000000001, + 242.897 + ], + [ + 418.9144287109375, + 242.897 + ], + [ + 418.9144287109375, + 260.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 101.09400000000001, + 260.23248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769519" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ec67c3d55d62642119c7ef36e5578bea48206ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +vs. Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. +[REDACTED], individually, and L.M. Individually, + +Defendant. + +**NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE TO FILE** +**MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND** +**OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA FOR JOINT PRIVILEGE DOCUMENTS** + +Undersigned counsel files this Limited Appearance for the specific purpose of filing this Motion for Protective Order and Objection to the disclosure of jointly privileged documents, and states the following: + +1. Undersigned counsel represented various Jane Doe's against Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, as a result of the under-aged molestation of these various young girls: + +a. Jane Doe v. Epstein, et.al. Case No. 50-2008CA006596XXXXMB AB + +b. B.B. v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB + +c. C.L. v. Epstein Case No. CASE NO: 10-80447 +CV-MARRA/[REDACTED] + +2. As recently as March 15, 2011, it has come to the attention of undersigned counsel that a subpoena was issued with respect to the disclosure of various electronic + +communications, (e-mails) that were subject of a joint prosecution privilege between the various plaintiff's counsel prosecuting similar cases against JEFFREY EPSTEIN. + +3. From the records reviewed in the instant litigation, it appears that JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is somehow now claiming to have been damaged by a Ponzi scheme run by Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. It appears that he has filed this spuriousl, lawsuit for illegitimate purposes to merely harass Defendant, EDWARDS, zind others. This abuse of the judicious process and his harassment is now impacting the rights of undersigned counsel's clients by attempting a fishing expedition into confidential and jointly privileged documents. + +4. There is nothing in the e-mails that AY nested which could possibly be relevant to a case involving ROTHSTEIN'S PonziGtem The email communication dealt with joint privilege strategy discussions between all Plaintiff's counsel in their cases against EPSTEIN. Thus, the documents should not be discoverable in the above captioned litigation. + +5. Several courts have applied the rules governing the joint defense privilege to joint prosecution agreements so as to create a joint-prosecution privilege under the same grants and strictures. See Purcell, 2 .D. at 25. (stating that "extending the principle underpinning the joint-defense o vi a several courts have recognized the joint-prosecutorial privilege as a parallel 4 • , and citing In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 89-3 & 89-4, John Doe 89-129 (Under ), 902 F.2d 244, 249; United States ex rel. Burroughs v. DeNardi Corp., 167 F.R.D. 680, 685-86 (S.D. Ca1.1996) (citing In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 902 F.2d at 249); Loustalet v. Refco Inc., 154 F.R.D. 243, 247 (C.D. Ca1.1993); Sedalcek v. Whitney Trading Group, 795 F. Supp. 329, 331 (C.D. Cal. 1992). + +> Leopold--Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (561) 515-1400 Facsimile (561) 515-1401 + +6. The joint prosecution privilege protects disclosures between two or more parties and their respective counsel if their communications are conducted under a joint prosecution agreement. See In re Sealed Case, 29 F.3d at 719 n. 5; Purcell, 209 F.R.D. at 25; In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990). + +7. Application of the joint prosecution privilege depends on a successful showing that: + +- 1) the communications occurred in the course oft, prosecution effort; +- 2) that communications were designed t. the effort; and +- 3) the privilege has not been waiv + +See In re Sealed Case, 29 F.3d at 719. + +8. The common interest privil rot cts disclosures between a lawyer and two or more clients regarding a matter of corm rest or common interests. See In re Sealed Case, 29 F.3d at 719; United States v\_ilt&" Col, 206 U.S. App. D.C. 317, 642 F.2d 1285, 1300 (D.C. Cir. 1980); United States v. McPartlin, 595 F.2d 1321, 1336 (7th Cir. 1979) (holding that parties need only have a commo est, not complete commonality of interests); Griffith v , 161 F.R.D. 687, 692 C.D. Cal. 1995) r 14j (same); Eisenberg v. Gagnon, 766 F.2d 770, 787-88 (3rd Cir. 1Q e); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 902 F.2d at 249. + +Parties may successfully operate under the common interest privilege if the communication: + +- 1) is prompted by actual or anticipated litigation; +- 2) for the purpose of furthering a common interest; and + +Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (56!) 515-1400 Facsimile (561) 515-1401 + +- 3) in a manner that is consistent with maintaining confidentiality against adverse parties. + +The existence of a common interest is determined at the time that the confidential information is disclosed. + +See In re UMWA Employee Benefits Plan Litigation, 159 F.R.D. 307, 314 (D.D.C. 1 4). + +10. The purpose of the joint prosecution and common interest p es i o ensure that attorneys feel free to fully and completely prepare for trial by at their legal preparations will not be accessible to an adversary. See AT&T Co., F.2 at 1300. + +11. All email communication between under w counsel and Mr. pertained to the joint prosecution of the EPSTEIN liti i communications clearly: + +- t\b +- c. the privilege h +- a. occurred in the course of a j ro cution effort; +- b. were designed to furtlfekie ort; and waived. + +WHEREFORE, UnderignS L t sel requests that the subpoena which has been issued and may result in the producti )stich privileged documents be quashed, or alternatively, the disclosure of such e-mlrik stayed until such time as undersigned counsel has had an opportunity to revie these documents and interpose any and all proper objections. + +Res sub + +SPENCE KUV1N, ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 089737 Email: skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. + +2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 515-1400 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was fumi ed by email and U. S. Mail, this CI day of March 2011, to Jack Scarola, Esq., Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm 409; Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Austral ue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., Bruce E. P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; F Weissing, Fistos and Lehrman, PL, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, ale, FL 33301; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One E Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Ft. L L 33301; L. Ackerman, Esq., Burnett, P.A., 901 Point • S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +> LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gar , FL 33410 (561) 515-14 (561)515-1 + +By: SPE , ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 089737 Email: skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com + +Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (561) 515-1400 Facsimile (561) 515-1401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f016fcaf9ef4ea037613079d4fb5af62464f09e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523/EFTA02769523.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769523.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6970, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 326.028, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 546.6120000000001, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 546.6120000000001, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 326.028, + 162.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE TO FILE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA FOR JOINT PRIVILEGE DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.74600000000001, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 497.52599999999995, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 497.52599999999995, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 115.74600000000001, + 380.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.644, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 390.74810791015625, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 390.74810791015625, + 179.613037109375 + ], + [ + 226.644, + 179.613037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769523" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a51cfb94d236ce52512ffb5f88f10038d8dd8a45 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually, J. M., individually, and L.M. individually, + +Defendant. + +TO: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD + +Case No: 502009CA040800NAXWB AG + +1;;•• v. cei • '' --cP-• slynr. Nn v.; 0 G c-, ass:co r, LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 alin Beach Gar FL 33410 Acclame(861) 515-140 (561) 515-1401(f mily9 + +> > By: + +SPEteCEt KNI134, ESQ. Florida Bar No: 089737 Email: skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com + +Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (561) 515-1400 Facsimile: (561) 515-1401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f632f30cc7f3474dafd041dbf80b7d0bfb944f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528/EFTA02769528.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769528.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2259, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.35, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF HIRING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.271, + 296.17499999999995 + ], + [ + 425.91644287109375, + 296.17499999999995 + ], + [ + 425.91644287109375, + 310.8630065917969 + ], + [ + 214.271, + 310.8630065917969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.37, + 88.508 + ], + [ + 403.86810302734375, + 88.508 + ], + [ + 403.86810302734375, + 104.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 239.37, + 104.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 116 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769528" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a606f5884491b21637ef79d5ebb6c4270b753a36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +tg P)4. • c . 7 . r:• rs,e) O4 + +## MOTION FOR PROTECTI \ E ORDER le + +Interested Person, CARL H. LINDER, S ough undersigned, moves this Honorable Court for the entry of a protective respect to discovery sought pursuant to the attached Notice and in support wo % ho iv at the document production described in the Notice is not reasonably calculat~~o, unreasonably invades the priva~y riglJtsrof third-parties. d to the discovery of admissible evidence and + +I HEREBY CER at a true and correct copy of th5,foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail k t all C el on the attached list, t " day of March, 20' + +4O arl H. Linder + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion for Protective Order (Stettin) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola B 2139 Palm Beach est Palm Beac 0 70 385- C5 & Shipley Co s \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f038a0198cca338a5141f08d578d580aae5b692e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530/EFTA02769530.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769530.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1546, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.34, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 539.34, + 115.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 115.18353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTI \\ E ORDER le", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.344, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 415.58477783203125, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 415.58477783203125, + 335.2210693359375 + ], + [ + 196.344, + 335.2210693359375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.974, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.9712829589844, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 348.9712829589844, + 148.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 259.974, + 148.1080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769530" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f8e1547d0878f16466592316563a192e1a7036b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +• 00 + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +## NOTICE OF HEARING / 7 + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hearing before the Honorable Honorable David one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in Courtroom 9C at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida on Monday, March 28, 2011 at 8:45 am., the following: + +Plaintiffs Motion for Pro Hac Vice + +I hereby certify that I have-made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this motioufor hearing. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355-4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via , sr electronic mail transmission and mailed this day of March, 2011 to Gary M. M, Jr., Esq., Jaffee, Weissing, Fistos, et al, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +selfli L. Fla. Bar No. 235 + +vv RNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Document, I \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3c435a5a747af6bce0e5d8a6f824208afb978d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532/EFTA02769532.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769532.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1983, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.652, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 464.1181945800781, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 464.1181945800781, + 73.488037109375 + ], + [ + 146.652, + 73.488037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING / 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.34, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 401.8299865722656, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 401.8299865722656, + 333.3580627441406 + ], + [ + 236.34, + 333.3580627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769532" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..afdafc892c28251802b1cabe08285d3368d561de --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.md @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXX85BAG + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE STEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECL P SING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF KING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENT 0 HE MEDIA AND PRESS. WITH INCORPORAtfli L AUTHORITIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, J undersigned counsel and pursuan this Motion for Protective Or PSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his .280(e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files dude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Ju • \_Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor tes: + +arch 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled victed paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. + +2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: + +- a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." +- b. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United States for sex." +- c. "We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr. Epstein while Mr. Epstein has been in the company of under-age children." + +[Exhibit 1]. + +3. That same day, the Palm Beach Daily News p • ed an article entitled "Jeffrey Epstein address book 'Holy Grail' of famous manes." •bi , . This article refers to the fact that "[t]he British press has been having a field ay gup new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." [Exhibit 21.t + +4. Two days later, another sh publication, "The Observer," reported: " ' 7' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last cfRat fiis team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what h a or may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein." [Exhibit 3). + +5. .fished comments by Mr. Scarola are clearly generating other articles about E' All statements and comments by Mr. Scarola to the press and media must therefore t.p immediately. + +6. This Court has the undeniable discretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. + +Maxwell 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966). Sentinel Communications Co. v. 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between lawyers and/or litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh. 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspa Autic rs, , Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). + +7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it saiC + +> Limitation placed on lawyers, litigan d fficials directly affected by court proceed'4 •e made at the court's discretion.... M - ers who may wish to make public t n.. ... has long been recognized as wi e •urt's inherent power to control profe o duct. + +Sta e ex rel. Miami Herald Publi h, 340 So. 2d at 910. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated- ton on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom N v. McCra , 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (order prohibiting public comment on evi and charges against two defendants by members of state attorney's office and sheri w toper preventive measure where prejudicial publicity threatened to impair the f it trial). + +y communications by Mr. Jack Scarola and Mr. J. , as attorneys dhd officers of the court, with the media and press are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6, entitled "Trial Publicity," states: + +- (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be + +disseminated by means of public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding due to its creation of an imminent and substantial detrimental effect on that proceeding. + +(b) Statements of Third Parties. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to make such a statement. Counsel shall exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, employees, or other persons assisting in or associated with a case from making extrajudicial statements that are prohibited uncle this rule." + +9. Rule 4-3.6 incorporates the "substantial likelihood o al prejudice" standard that the United States Supreme Court found to be a " tionally permissible balance between the First Amendment rights of attorneys in p s and the state's interest in fair trials." Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada 501 U.S,-j8 5, 111 S. Ct. 2720, 2745, 115 L. Ed. 2d 888 (1991). + +10. In a letter of Marc 18, RWF, in an effort to conserve this Court's time and resources, undersigned coun ed Mr. Scarola to enter into a written agreement guaranteeing that Mr. Scarola, rd l=, and their respective agents and employees will not engage in any extrajudici l commentary concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with m'c ) ernitles. + +e undersigned's efforts have not unfortunately, been successful. An e-mail response to the above March 18, 2011 letter was received on March 21, 2011 rejecting the request. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. J. , and their respective agents and employees, from participating, encouraging, assisting, or abetting in the dissemination of any out-of-court publicity or extra-judicial statements and commentary to the media and press concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females. Additionally, the requested Protective Order should direct all parties and their counsel, and their respective agents and employees, not to participate, encourage, assist, or abet in the dissemination of -of-court publicity, statement and commentary in this matter which is injurious tC) reputation. ey + +Respectful) + +( S . and + +AO ) + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +E. Knight Fla. Bar. No. 607363 BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this 721 day of March, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +c) + +7 , E. Knight, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 607363 + +# Otte Telegraph + +## Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer + +Jeffre pstein, his paedophile friend, The Daily Telegraph h The lli of York could be asked to give evidence in two separate legal case nvolving is learnt. + +CO S + +![](_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell s yed at rIngham as guests of the Photo: ALBANPIX/GEOFF PUGH - - - - - + +By JonSweintAta://www.telegraph co.ukijournalists/jon-ewaineil, in Palm Beach, Florida 10:00PM GMT 10 Mar 2011 + +![](_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg) + +Lawyers for a Florida attorney who is being sued by Epstein have disclosed that they want to take a statement from the because they believe he may be able to shed fresh light on Epstein's alleged sex offences. + +Meanwhile the FBI has indicated that it will reopen its criminal investigation into Epstein after receiving new Information. He was convicted in 2008 for soliciting an under-age girl for prostitution. Sources in America have said the FBI could ask the to give evidence as part of the new investigation. + +Epstein, 58, was sentenced to 18 months in prison after admitting two sex offences as part of a plea bargain deal. But allegations were made against him by as many as 40 girls, of whom 17 have settled civil claims they brought against the billionaire. + +Epstein is himself suing Brad a lawyer for several of the girls. Epstein alleges that Mr was linked to a fraud committed by a former colleague — a claim dismissed by the local bar association and that his clients' cases against Epstein were therefore invalid. + +Further scrutiny onMof York over lobbying + +(http/www.telergeplI.co.uktnews/uknews/theroyalfamilyff3372507/Further-scrutinro 7..9PPSSIPTJ) 1 ork-over + +Timeline: the' of York's questionable friends + +ktiqp:.11www .tele.grqpb . co .uki news/ u knewslt her 9yalf aml!y /8366227/Tim line- of-yorksqueslionable-friends.htnip • + +Labour MP: Prince Andrew is 'an embarrassment' (http:/ ph.c,o.uk(news/newsvideo/ukpolitics-video/8366220/Labour-MP-Prince-Andrew-isfile9t•htEll) + +DUChess negotiated debt pay-off for several month + +(http://www.telegsaph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfarnlly/8366981/Duchess-of-York-spent-nine-monthsnegotiating-with-convicted-paedophile-Jeffrenpstein-to-pay-off-her-debts.html) + +,••A ' + +• + +Mr , meanwhile, claims Epstein is abusing the legal system by seeking to intimidate other lawyers and girls, and is counter-suing,the financier for substantial damages. + +He is seeking to, prove to the court that Epstein did sexually abuse dozens of children, allegedly at his Florida mansion in most cases, where the ■ **enjoyed holidays and massages. Jack Scarola, the lawyer representing Mr told The Daily Telegraph: "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given hitIMeldnship with Jeffrey Epstein.** + +**"We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children Inside and outside the United States for sex.** + +**"We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr Epstein while Mr Epstein has been in the company of under-aged children."** + +Asked whether he had any reason to suspect the had been present while under-age girls were abused, Mr Scarola said: "That's not something I can publicly comment on. We have an ongoing investigation and an ongoing prosecution of a civil case. These are not matters of public record and I am restricted in what I can say on the public record' + +There is no allegation that the MI had sexual contact with any of the girls or that he was aware of any wrongdoing by Epstein. + +Mr Scarola added: "Deposition testimony has been taken generally concerning Mr Epstein's association with many high-profile people." + +Documents filed in the case so far include Epstein's private phone directory — which Included numerous contact details for the along with masseuses and dozens of other prominent friends. They also include flight logs for Epstein's private jet, which detailed a trip the took with hien in 2000-and a 1998 meeting between Epstein, the Duchess of York and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. + +Mr Scarola said he anticipated "significant procedural impedim tam ing sworn deposition from the In due to his ability to claim diplomatic immunity. He said orced to turn to international law. + +"The Hague Convention specifically outlines procedures CPmu be followed for the citizen of one country to be compelled to give testimony regarding a case Nipanother,' he said. + +A Buckingham Palace spokesman declined mme + +0 Copyright of Telegraph Media Group ted AS 1 ) + +guardian.cauk lbeCitserver + +## Prince Andrew's link to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein taints royalty in US + +The of York's friendship with billionaire convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein has put him on American front pages 21;. Paul Hameln New Vat + +![](_page_9_Picture_4.jpeg) + +" r 4 . ne ve1Oreet. Undo is Math 2011 + +. 1 A btu hoes + +![](_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg) + +Pr' Lee Andrew is + +finding his friendships under international examination. ,Ftlhotograple remade Arrizabalaga/EPA + +The British press has a new admirer. Spencer ICuvi rids lawicer who has fought several cases for young women alleging sexual a ilifigractd billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, is delighted — and relieved — that now examining Edna Andrew's relationship with the tonvietedps + +"I am glad the British press has picked t up," Kevin told the Observer. - The British people have a right to ask why he (Prince ) Is hanging out with a convicted paedophile. I think that is a question to be asking" + +Kuvin has been asking it for a whi . He believes Epstein has in effect got away with most of his crimes because of his alth and his connections with the powerful and wellconnected across America end the world. + +"He's line. He hes a great life," he said of the man who spent less than two years in jail after p Id sex offences. + +That is p e. Florida law allows anyone to find out the whereabouts of a convicted offender via an online database. According to the website last week Epstein's location was St in the US Virgin Islands in the Caribbean. He owns a private island there: one that Prince Andrew has visited. 'Epstein is probably sunning himself on a beach right now," Kuvin said. + +The same cannot be said for the IM of York This weekend, as he considers the parlous state of his international reputation, he is likely to feeling a lot less comfortable than his one-time party friend. + +It was not meant to be this way for the prince. America is supposed to be a happy hunting ground for the British family. It is a place where the people see them as exotic celebrities to be feted, admired and placed alongside the homegrown "royalty" of Hollywood. + +American citizens and politicians - freed from the burdens of paying for a civil list of their own — can indulge in the sort of innocent worship of monarchical "glam" that typified Britain in the I95os. + +So recent headlines in the US media have come as a bit of a shock. 'Seen around town: Prince Andrew and Pen,Billionaire; blared the New York Post. "Duchess of York apologises for accepting money from sex offender," read the New York Daily News. So much for the eager anticipation of a slew of good publicity around the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton. + +It was not just the American tabloids. Even the Wall Street Journal ran a lengthy piece last week prompted by the fallout from Prince Andrew's long friendship and close relations with Epstein, 58, who served 18 months for sexual offences involving underage girls. No wonder New York Post columnist Andrea Peyser weighed in on the controversy about what she called a tbromance between the pair. Prince Andrew, she concluded, was an "idiot prince. + +It is hard to fathom the depths of the PR disaster that continues to unfold around th prince because of his links to Epstein. After he was snapped walking side by side Epstein through Central Park last December, Andrew has seen his entire ski existence as a trade ambassador put under the microscope. It has not born + +Suddenly his life and times partying with Epstein have become publi complete with sordid details of being surrounded by young women d ing nt at topless pool parties. A woman, , who provided u ces for Epstein and his rich friends while underage, saw the phot a ed to speak about her experiences. Another picture rapidly surfaced, t si e by side with the prince. To cap it all, Andrew's links to a whole seriesptuppleasaaitdeveloping world autocrats and dictators have also come under fresh + +None of it has made a pretty picture and the to react in any meaningful way. First, th Only now, belatedly, have they begun talked to Andrew privately. It feels too I te. ps typically — have been slow snored. Then it was dismissed. h reports that the Queen has + +Like many Europeans, perhaps, enjoyed the US because of the freedom and opportunities it afforded. The in glittering hotspots like Manhattan and Florida's Palm Beach "a. him free himself from the stuffy world of aristocratic Britain. He was coca won over by the rich elite and he repaid the compliment. + +No one knows carried on such a close friendship with a figure like Epstein fo I y he refused to end it after Epstein went to jail. The facts alone should eve aming sign. Epstein, a working class Brooklyn boy who became a super- t y manager, was one of the world's most renowned playboys. But in 0008, after ree-year investigation into the young women he and his entourage procured, he wound up in jail. Nor was it an isolated incident. Epstein's case was ended via a plea bargain where he admitted guilt on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution involving a minor. Yet as many as eo young women had made allegations against him and, unusually, his plea deal allowed other accusers to sue him in civil court, So far at least 17 of them have settled civil cases against him. + +The American drama is far from over for the prince. Instead the legal wangling.' around Epstein and his exotic lifestyle threaten to drag the family right into the US court system. + +Epstein la now suing Brad a lawyer for some of the girls from the original investigation. In turn is counter-suing Epstein, alleging that the billionaire is using his vast resources to pursue expensive legal cases and thus intimidate other victims and their legal representatives. Either way, Andrew could be pulled into the mess as a witness. lawyer, Jack Smola, said last week that his team intended to try and get s statement from the prince about what he may or may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein. + +Though the prince is likely to claim diplomatic immunity, that step will not keep his name out of the court papers or the headlines: it will just keep his presence out of the courtroom. + +The same thing goes for previous cases involving Epstein. They amount to a potential source of PR torture for the family as media scrutiny continues. Recently released documents from a different case showed that two of E stein's closest confidantes - his PA Sarah Ellen and an on-off girlfriend, - were repeatedly questioned by Kuvin about whether the prince had been involved in sexual acts with any of Epstein's entourage of young women. Both Ellen and declined to answer the questions and instead took the Fifth Amendment, which allows their legal silence. + +Of course, there is no evidence or suggestion that Andrew was Involved. But in PR there does not need to be. There is even a small chance that the FBI will use so new revelations emerging in the media to reopen the criminal case against E though legal experts think it unlikely. + +Even the hint of a possibilty of a federal probe is another reason for to start sharpening their pens for those with links to Epstein. + +Prince Andrew is not the only one. Epstein has partied in or t umerous people since he left jail, including big names and celebrit Katie de. Stephanopoulos and Woody M. Perhaps they tooft ld have own better. + +### CONNECTIONS + +■ Ghislaine Maxwell, 49, youngest daughter o Maxwell, the former Doily Mirror proprietor, is considered one of nce row's more controversial friends. A decade ago, he was reported to have acco ed her to a 'hookers and pimps" party in New York. Ghislalne moved to in tggt after the death of her father and became a fixture on the Manhattan party t, here she befriended Jeffrey Epstein. + +■ Gaga Ashim a glamorous Kazakh oil tycoon, claims to be a "close friend" of Prince Andrew. n. Oxford-educated socialite and entrepreneur, said: "Britain is veryi uc ha him." She was introduced to Andrew in toot and they have been friends sitlse. Sh as his guest at Ascot in 2007, although she denies rumours that they have eve couple. + +• TareliKaltuni, a convicted Libyan gun smuggler, is an old friend . In 2008 he and Andrew enjoyed a four-day holiday to Tunisia. Kaituni was convicted of buying a machine gun in soot and secretly attempting to transport it from Holland to Prance. + +surardlan.cch•It °Guardian Mm.. sad Mott Limited 2011 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6ff1ae8cbd67da9d7c61416db206938f104de93 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/EFTA02769534.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,632 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 21167, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.73, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE STEIN'S MOTION \nFOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECL P SING COUNSEL AND \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF KING EXTRA-JUDICIAL \nSTATEMENTS AND COMMENT 0 HE MEDIA AND PRESS. \nWITH INCORPORAtfli L AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.703, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 391.10302734375 + ], + [ + 101.703, + 391.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.411, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 391.1180725097656, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 391.1180725097656, + 113.22802734375 + ], + [ + 226.411, + 113.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Otte Telegraph", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.23599999999999, + 64.896240234375 + ], + [ + 209.09188842773438, + 64.896240234375 + ], + [ + 209.09188842773438, + 104.8145751953125 + ], + [ + 64.23599999999999, + 104.8145751953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new \ncriminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with \na lawyer", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.23599999999999, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 534.79931640625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 534.79931640625, + 181.68218994140625 + ], + [ + 64.23599999999999, + 181.68218994140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Prince Andrew's link to sex offender \nJeffrey Epstein taints royalty in US", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.598, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.27801513671875, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 358.27801513671875, + 158.1597900390625 + ], + [ + 80.598, + 158.1597900390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONNECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.47199999999998, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 229.2861328125, + 427.68 + ], + [ + 229.2861328125, + 442.7335510253906 + ], + [ + 128.47199999999998, + 442.7335510253906 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 54 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769534" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f45207d2ac40db1f31f0abde567376050b202e89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e3b8bcf5966c0757ac934aad02ead58f29ded30e258e7ab592c3ead8da930e85 +size 62964 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1757ba9e63a32b10b6bfd019758c5a217c43e52 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_6_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08fe8d9eb83b1c014aedf53cf4c9aaca63dd58ad80ee9801e47405c70db83e66 +size 3369 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a178babc9d9483eeea70fd117a84505e0c03008 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1b0f6e73e6aa539757d25274a51801350cfc5d3de56eaaf877b6c76aed4d1e76 +size 1945 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..548bcb76273d6f8d3f085be2460dfc49697588fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769534/_page_9_Picture_7.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6f92dff05286d2b2cfc7001116e0414677ee0a9c2c3e84deed63a492df972525 +size 28266 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba79e653e2a81ee6027cac737d2ed04397cf1adf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +TIME: 3:15 p.m. + +following: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED ec, th?undersigned has called up for hearing the \* Pe + +DATE: Friday, April 8, C 01 + +IIP JUDGE: Ho (s ble r k, • w, David F.(Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Flaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## (15 MkAl; NOTICE OF SPEC ARING + +CJ + +PLACE: N. ixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROO + +SPECIFI ATTERS TO BE HEARD: Defendant/Counter-Claimant, J. Motion for Protective Order, Objections to Cancelled Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of Records Custodian of Trustee Herbert Stettin (January 20, 2011), and Motion for Appointment of Robert Carney as Special + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +1. 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +2. 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +3. 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +**\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay.** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Electronic and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 24th day of March, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33aa42d55a2a1705308050ffeef6ef51fb4e4498 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546/EFTA02769546.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769546.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3134, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 534.525390625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 534.525390625, + 117.48248291015625 + ], + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 117.48248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(15 MkAl; \nNOTICE OF SPEC ARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.882, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 411.37060546875, + 350.73 + ], + [ + 411.37060546875, + 380.74249267578125 + ], + [ + 197.882, + 380.74249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.662, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 349.662, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 145.8 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769546" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..456b2dc6278c426fadfd703324223f4537c63c30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.md @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +## #291874 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408000?CXIMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +-: • rrl • • r-rr r,") - I, + +## DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, IIIIII J. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley ?S . it14 wards, by and through his undersigned attorneys and pursuant to Court Order he p visions of Rule 1.201(b), F.R. Civ. P., hereby files his Case Management Statemt jli nce of the Case Management Conference scheduled \_..,., before this Court on April 15, kJII. + +A. As to the i yen the claims asserted by the Plaintiff against Mr. . it has .i/ been and remains positron of Mr. that there are not material issues of fact in dispute \ "r --- ti Ft and the undisputedifacts entitle Mr. to entry of a summary judgment. The Plaintiff has ' \-\_\_\_n ../II continthichts-unproductive, expensive and grossly burdensome fishing expedition to find nonexistent evidence to support his fabricated theory that Mr. was a participant in a Ponzi scheme in which the Plaintiff was neither an investor nor a collateral victim in any respect. The Plaintiff has never been able to articulate a credible theory of either liability or damage, and he has failed to offer any explanation as to how he could possibly be entitled to maintain a claim for + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 2 of 7 + +affirmative relief while simultaneously hiding behind his constitutional protections to remain silent and deny Mr. any substantive response to a single relevant question. Accordingly, Mr. against him. is unable to provide a brief statement describing Mr. Epst in's claims + +We contend that Mr. Epstein's suit was initiated and maintaine JAps an effort to intimidate Mr. into abandoning his legitimate and fully j tifie orts to vigorously prosecute damage claims on behalf of victims of Mr. Epstein' ophilia. As to the issues on Mr. counter-claim, we are prepared to proc on the counter-claim at the earliest available date. + +if \ B. Mr. Epstein has never been culate any plausible theory of damages when repeatedly pressed by the Court t o. N6 legally viable theory exists. + +Mr. has been darriCedloy e expenditure of time, effort, resources and money ,7--- N. ii, to defend against Mr. Epstein'tkspuyious claims and has endured the public embarrassment of having been branded as! INF( icipant in one of history's largest and most notorious Ponzi schemes. + +C. ment is viewed by Mr. as highly unlikely. + +E. In the event that the claim against Mr. were to be disposed of by Summary Judgment in advance of trial, Mr. would seek leave to amend the counterclaim to add a count for malicious prosecution arising out of the identical facts supporting the + +o additional parties are anticipated to be added to the litigation. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 3 of 7 + +pending claim for abuse of process. The malicious prosecution claim is premature until such time as the claims against Mr. have been disposed of in his favor. + +There is a pending motion to assert a claim for punitive damages set for hearing on March 30, 2011. ----':.\ ) + +We foresee no Msonable possibility of obtaining any significant adletissibps of fact or of documents from Mr. Epstein that will avoid unnecessary proof sint it has -2 been Mr. Epstein's 2 obvious strategy from the inception of this litigation to use thrftfigation as a means by which to inflict the greatest possible burden on Mr. + +We are prepared to limit the nu ,experts to testify in support of the propriety of Mr. actions and the I ce of a good faith basis to support Mr. Epstein's claims to two per side. We pate o expert testimony on compensatory damages. We may call one expert to addres the punitive damage phase of the trial regarding Mr. Epstein's pecuniary circumstan )We are prepared to disclose experts within 7 days following Mr. Epstein's disclosure. + +Mr. Edwards:has no objection to the use of juror notebooks, but their utility is doubtful as this is not expectedito be a document-intensive case. + +mr.11= Motion for Summary Judgment was denied solely on the grounds that Mr. Epstein had not completed his discovery. He has now received over 25,000 pages of e-mails and deposed multiple Ponzi scheme investors. Neither the documentary evidence nor the testimony + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 4 of 7 + +link Mr. in any way to participation in Mr. Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The Motion for Summary Judgment should be rescheduled and granted. + +F. Jack Scarola will serve as lead counsel on behalf of Mr. + +G. Mr. and third parties have motions for protective order the Court. riding before + +H. This subsection has been addressed above. + +I. This subsection has been addressed above. + +,i J. Special Carney was appointed infilr related bankruptcy proceeding to .7 .-..\\ address discovery issues arising out of the issuafite a subpoena in this case to obtain documents formerly in the exclusive custody 2 of • -X\ the' bankruptcy trustee. Mr. has \ repeatedly offered to stipulate to Judge\_CaMey's appointment by this Court as Special to \\ deal with identical issues which musturti afely be decided by this Court. 77 - + +Copies of the documents which had previously been in the exclusive possession of the trustee have been red by the trustee to Mr. The trustee's involvement and the involver of the bankruptcy court have now become irrelevant to this proceeding. However, arney is still proceeding with a privilege analysis as directed by the banlcrup rt and remains willing to serve as Special in this proceeding to facilitate resolution of discovery issues. Mr. continues to consent to this appointment. Mr. Epstein has declined and continues to decline to agree to the appointment of a Special =, + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 5 of 7 + +consistent with his utilization of the pending claim to inflict maximum damage on Mr. who continues to prosecute NEW claims against Mr. Epstein on behalf of additional victims. + +K. The trial of the counter-claim from jury selection to a Phase H punitive damage verdict is estimated to take 7 trial days. + +L. for trial. Mr. sees no need for further case management cotifrai\* and is ready + +M. Relevant documents include the charging documents in the State prosecution of Mr. Epstein, his plea of guilty and sentencing doct ients;, tife Federal Non-Prosecution \ Agreement, all civil Complaints filed against Mr.nstei pn behalf of his molestation victims, all documents attached to and referenced in Mr. Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment, all time records reflecting time expended bylir. Edvards, his associates, and staff on the defense of A=nn the spurious and baseless claims against him, all documents reflecting expenditures by and on \// • behalf of Mr. in defenVi d` t ihe pending claim, all media accounts referencing the claims against Mr. Epstein, Mr. ,s ctein, and Mr. + +al witnesses include all persons referenced in Mr. Motion for Summary behalf o , all attorneys who participated in presenting claims against Mr. Epstein on lestation victims, and 2 "emotional distress" witnesses. + +N. Plaintiff anticipates calling two witnesses with expertise in legal ethics. + +0. None. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 6 of 7 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing his been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached day of ake-K--, 2011. + +Jack Scarola + +Fludda Bar No.: 169440 + +Sfiarc benney Scarola Barnhart , P. + +21 Palm Beach Lakes Boule + +est Palm Beach, Florida 3340 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) + +Attorneys for + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Case Management Statement Page 7 of 7 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 4: 84c Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +O ' + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 S Phone: (954) 524-2820 ' Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +9 + +) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esqm Burnett, P 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Driv West Palm Beac 33401-6170 Phone: (561) Fax: (561 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3b468e45dba34d7651ba5c201409cab267853bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549/EFTA02769549.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769549.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 8546, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "#291874 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.94998931884766, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 531.389404296875, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 531.389404296875, + 116.97802734375 + ], + [ + 71.94998931884766, + 116.97802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, IIIIII J. \nCASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.672, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 478.065, + 334.53 + ], + [ + 478.065, + 363.80853271484375 + ], + [ + 126.672, + 363.80853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 131.22 + ], + [ + 351.4562683105469, + 147.10748291015625 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 147.10748291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769549" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769556/EFTA02769556.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769556/EFTA02769556.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc97056d63b6a535f5b68ad4bf6341eccd8cd17b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769556/EFTA02769556.md @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +#### CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and J. individually, Defendants. 04 r.) + +co + +#### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSCI)S CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT PURSUANT TO FLA. It CIV. PRO. 1.201(b) + +The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to this Court's Order dated February 17, 2011, files his initial Case Management Report and would state as follows: + +### I. BRIEF FACTUAL STATEMENT + +The Plaintiff seeks dainages against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein and J. M , based on the illegaT,Ponzi scheme in which the Defendants and others are alleged to Y. have participated. The Plaintiff contends that the scheme involved marketing investments to , outside investors in the lawsuits brought against the Plaintiff by a number of minor females who claimed to have been victims of sexual molestations by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has taken the deposition of one investor, Kretschmar, who testified that Mr. Rothstein identified the Plaintiff as a target of at least one of the investments/Ponzi schemes. Mr. Kretschmar testified that he was able to view approximately 19 boxes of RRA's case files against Mr. Epstein, which included pleadings, police reports, newspaper articles. He was also shown the flight logs. + +It also appears on another occasion, Mr. Rothstein showed boxes of the case files against Jeffrey Epstein to a lawyer named Michael Legamaro who was representing investors in the alleged Ponzi scheme. + +The Plaintiff has alleged and claims that the Defendants and perhaps other former employees of RRA conspired to use the Epstein/LM litigation and claims by other alleged victims to lure investors into making approximately \$13,000,000 worth of investments into alleged settlements with Mr. Epstein. The Plaintiff contends that as a cult of the efforts of Rothstein to market his investment scheme, steps were taken by Mr. and other members of his firm to utilize the pending cases against Mr. Epstein t ad ce the interest of the Ponzi scheme by taking actions outside the scope of what ably necessary to prosecute the claims against Mr. Epstein, i.e. an abuse of proc + +denies being a participant in'alky Ponzi scheme, civil theft or criminal enterprise. Moreover, Mr. claims that the real purpose of this lawsuit was to pressure and one of his clients LM in pending ligation. professional relationship and dal ages from this action. has claimed damage to his reputation, + +Rothstein has not fiIed an answer. + +#### IL ;IC\ GAL THEORIES K + +Epstein has' plead claims for damages based on Florida's Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act against all Defendants, claims for damages based on Florida Rico Act against all Defendants, claims for damages for abuse of process against all Defendants. + +has denied the allegations of Epstein's claim for damages and has further asserted a counterclaim for damages for injury to his reputation, interference with his professional relationship, loss of value of his time and the cost of defending this action. + +#### III. LIKELIHOOD OF SETTLEMENT + +It is unlikely that this case will settle in the foreseeable future. + +### IV. LIKELIHOOD OF APPEARANCE IN ACTION OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES + +It is not possible to say at this time whether other parties will be added; however, it is clear that other members of the former RRA firm may have participated in as ' the Ponzi scheme. Until Epstein can obtain the discovery for which he has sough the trustee and M , it will not be possible to state with any degree of certainty wile er parties will be added to the action. + +### V. STATUS OF OUTSTANDING MATTERS" + +# A. Special Proceedings V + +I. From the PlaintifVe nse to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, the court is familiar 'th The procedural history and the efforts of the Plaintiff to obtain -S sm 'the bankruptcy trustee and from Mr. to prepare a privil ge to . at history will not be recited here. However, Judge Ray's last order required a privilege log be prepared and served prior to January 31, 11. On January 26, 2011, Jaffe and served a "Privilege r eliH ch did not comport with any requirement of federal or state law for the NItiaration of a privilege log. A subsequent privilege log was filed which also did not comport with the requirements for the preparation of a privilege log. The special ordered additional information be provided and set April 6, 2011 for a preliminary in-camera review. A copy of the Interim Report of Special is attached as Exhibit "1". Even though a number of documents have been produced for review by the Plaintiff, the Confidentiality Agreement requires the + +Plaintiff to get approval from the special before they are used in any deposition or court proceeding. + +As can be seen by the recommendation of the special =, it is anticipated that once the preliminary in-camera review is concluded and obvious non-privilege matters are removed from consideration, it will be necessary to schedule evidentiary hearings on whether any of the claimed privilege documents still remain privileged or the privilege has been waived or tt je, to an exception. It is anticipated that those hearings will be briefed in 8dvan e of their scheduling. It is more likely that they will not be schedul fo May 2011. + +2. Counsel for the invest° placed money into the Ponzi scheme, Conrad Scherer, serve ena that was substantially the same as Epstein's on the trustee. as tally intended that they be part of the special proceeding, ticipated that they will. They have filed a Motion before Judge Ra se April 11, 2011. + +3. Counsel for some of the alleged victim Plaintiffs in the underlying lawsuits gainst Mr. Epstein has also filed a limited notice of appearance and a n for protective order relating to documents disclosed on the privilege log t are claimed to be protected by a "joint-defense privilege". It is anticipated that this counsel, Spencer Kuvin, will be participating in the special proceedings. + +B. Jurisdiction Issues Between the Bankruptcy Court and the Circuit Court Since the records of former RRA are property of the bankruptcy trustee, the jurisdiction relating to the use of those records falls within the jurisdiction of the + +bankruptcy court. Since the subpoenas on this case emanate from the Circuit Court, issues relating to the subpoena and the ultimate admissibility of the documents produced by the trustee belong within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court. The problem that arises is that a party in the bankruptcy proceeding seeks the same records as Mr. Epstein. It was the intention of the bankruptcy court to have a special resolve those issues as to both parties. The remaining issue will be which court, the Bankruptcy Court or the Circuit Court will rule on the recommendations or any objections to the recommendations of the special The Plaintiff believes that only one court should make that determination because if it were split among the courts,, with the state court ruling on the recommendations as to the state case and the bankruptcy court ruling on the same recommendations as it relates'to the bankruptcy case, then there is the possibility for conflicting decisions as to whether a privilege exists or not, thus opening the door in one court fora Party in another court to use what may have been determined to be 'privileged records. This is a matter without an easy resolution and it still needs"to be resolved. + +## ( \Additional Pending Records Request From the Trustee + +also The Bankruptcy Court's initial order granting Epstein's Motion to Compel required the production of records from RRA's server and from Q-Task. + +Judge Ray has entered an order of contempt, assessed fines, and fees against Q-Task for failure to follow orders of the bankruptcy court. It appears that the next step for Q-Task if they fail to comply will be subject to arrest and incarceration. It is not certain when they will produce the requested records, but it + +is anticipated within the next three months. Q-Task has appealed, but Judge Ray's order has not been stayed. + +It is anticipated that the RRA server records will be made available within the next two months; however, it is likely they will also be subject to privilege claims, the preparation of a privilege log, an in-camera hearing as with the earlier documents. x + +### D. Contacts With Law Enforcement Records + +The Plaintiff also subpoenaed records by an en RRA and certain law enforcement agencies during the pros f these civil claims. The trustee is prepared to produce those re goes not believe any privileges exist. However, there is a Motio Prot live Order claiming privileges, even though these law enforcemet(ageleies are third parties, which is scheduled At before this court for A rT 1. The Defendant seeks a Motion for Protection claiming the records 1vileged and seeking the appointment of Robert Carney to be a special so that a privilege log and in-camera inspection of these records ma mint. If the court determines that a log and in-camera inspection is tined, then the Plaintiff anticipates that based on past experience with the cef theendant in preparing proper privilege logs, it could be several months before log is actually prepared and in a form for an in-camera review and hearing on the claim for privileges. + +### E. Other Motions Scheduled + +March 30, 2011: Motion to Add Claim for Punitive Damages; + +March 31, 2011: M' Motion to Reconsider Judge Ruling + +Denying Discovery Until Alleged Sexual Conduct + +If this Motion is granted, it will substantially expand the discovery and issues relating to the case making it highly unlikely that this case will be ready for trial for at least another year. + +April 1, 2011: Epstein's Motion to Compel Edw. . swer Questions at His Deposition and to Corn er Deposition; + +April 5, 2011: Epstein's Motion to Co r scovery From and Whether the Priv' e Are Waived; + +April 6, 2011: Preliminary IiCCIam Review by the Special =, Judge Cirney + +April 8, 2011: Edwards' Motion for Protective Order Regarding Subpoena Enforcement Contacts With RRA; + +### VI. DISCOVERY PQ\$MONS + +A. Pres9tly, two depositions of investors have occurred. It is anticipated that at least threc more will occur. Part of the delay is getting records that claims are privileged. Li + +It is difficult to determine how many more individuals will need to be disposed and a more likely estimate of that will occur after at least the initial rulings on the incamera review take place. However, it is anticipated that at least three or four members of the former RRA firm will be deposed. + +## C. Amendment to Pleadings + +The Plaintiff will amend his pleadings once the discovery of the RRA records is substantially concluded. Epstein has amended his pleadings to take out any possible argument that the issues of whether the Plaintiff actually was involved with these assaults is part of this case. + +## VII. THE PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED TIME LIMITS + +A. To join other parties and amend pleadings: 30 dad after their production of the records from RRA that were subject of the first two Epstein bpo as (investor contacts and law Enforcement contacts) and the production of the and Q-Task documents + +B. To identify any non-parties: 30 from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special master. the production of the records + +C. To file and hear motions: 60 days after the production of the records from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special master, + +D. To disclose expert Witnesses: 90 days after the production of records from RRA by the bankruptcy trustee/special + +E. Scheduling of trial: Plaintiff request this not be considered until subsequent Ma co erence after production of the records sought from the bankruptcy trustee has taken + +Names of Attorneys Responsible for Handling the Action + +I) Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein Ackerman, Jr., Esq. F. Knight, Esquire + +2) Defendant, J. Jack Scarola, Esq. + +- 3) Defendant, Scott Rothstein Marc Nurik, Esq. + +### G. Necessity for a Protective Order to Facilitate Discovery + +Numerous Motions for Protective Order that have been filed by the Defendant, + +M , has caused an unwarranted delay in this proceeding. It is likely that future protective orders will be filed, by the Plaintiff, particularly if issues of sexual conduct becomes a part of this case. At the present time, the Plaintiff is not aware of any protective order that can be entered ti fetate discovery. + +- H. Plaintiffs Proposal for the Fo lati t and Simplification of Issues/Timing of Motions for Sutprnary gment and Partial Summary Judgment + +Once this matter is set faCrial, e deadline for Motions for Partial Summary Judgment or Summary Judgment would be 60 days prior to discovery cut off. Further, the Plaintiff submits that future Motions for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment should not be heard until the records from the bankruptcy trustee have been provided and are available for use in discovery and for deposition. + +- I. Possibility of Obtaining Admissions of Fact/Exchange of Documents and Stipulations Regarding Authenticity + +At this point, it is difficult to say what the likelihood would be for obtaining admissions of fact and voluntarily exchange of documents and other evidence. To date, very little of this has been able to be accomplished. + +- J. Suggestions on Advisability and Timing of Magistrate, Special Mediation + +A special has already been appointed by the bankruptcy court. The issue which needs to be resolved is which court will rule on the special recommendations and/or objections to his report without creating inconsistent rulings. + +It is unlikely that mediation will be effective until the case is ,ready to be set for trial. Counsel for has previously stated that they have no interest in mediation. 0 + +# K. Preliminary Estimate of Time Required for T Plaintiff estimates that it will take 10-15 trial t the entire case. + +#### L. Description of Documents and U itnesses + +The parties have already, pureant t0ran earlier court order submitted a list of documents and fact wth +day of March, 2011. + +DAVID F. CROW +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Notice of Limited Appearance to File Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Subpoena for Joint Privilege Documents + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769571/EFTA02769571.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769571/EFTA02769571.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..697191c6d849f45cd272057859e06927a2592cb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769571/EFTA02769571.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769571.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2491, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.01, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE TO FILE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA FOR JOINT PRIVILEGE DOCUMENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.562, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 470.862, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 470.862, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 137.562, + 349.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 350.2389999999999, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 350.2389999999999, + 185.49 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 185.49 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769571" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..896dc705fc3378b173bf2642b8aac50382c1bcd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +*Ague 1* + +2011 MAR 30 PM 1:48 +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, JR. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**ORDER** + +**THIS MATTER** came before this court on March 30, 2011, upon Motions for Protective Order filed on behalf of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]. This Court having reviewed the motion, hearing argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that the motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: + +1. The motion is denied to the extent that the trustee may provide last known home address for the following individual(s): Cara L. [REDACTED], Jacqui [REDACTED], Mercedes [REDACTED], Elizabeth [REDACTED], Christina Finch, Carl Linder, Jonathan Birkman, Rob Buschel. + +2. The motion is granted to the extent it requests records containing any other information other than that set forth above in paragraph 1. + +3. This Order is without prejudice to the Plaintiff to seek further relief should the information provided by the trustee is not sufficient to allow the Plaintiff to locate the above-named individual(s) for the purpose of serving a subpoena for deposition. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of Mar in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach + +County, Florida. + +![]()Copies Furnished to: +See attached Service List + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 49 One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +"S ) + +Esq Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 talla + +4CY + +Charles II. Lichtman Berger Singermann 350 Las Olas Blvd, 10th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 3330 Counsel for Trustee,,jferbift Stettin + +÷`) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a485bf42b5108c409614f35b63f8be3091f43a96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573/EFTA02769573.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769573.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2299, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.47, + 41.31 + ], + [ + 462.984, + 41.31 + ], + [ + 462.984, + 69.66 + ], + [ + 148.47, + 69.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 278.76, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 327.24, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 327.24, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 278.76, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.762, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 348.7940368652344, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 348.7940368652344, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 258.762, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769573" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46b290cd022398cf28acb1aca573c0c420fc0573 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.md @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. Individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +;', c 34; rn A N. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ.Arrp420; + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800X.X.WW, B AS + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION RE- NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM + +TO: All Counsel of Record + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that tht4ers ed counsel hereby cancels the deposition listed below as follows: + +NAME + +AJ Discala Th 'ay arch 31, 2011 :00 a.m. + +TIME PLACE + +To be Determined in in New York + +\*The deponent has been instructed to bring with him all documents listed in Schedule A attached tolls Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition. + +upon oral examination before a Notary Public, or before some other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. + +The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes, Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court. + +YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND CROSS EXAMINE. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, within a reasonable time prior to any proceeding, contact the Administrative Office of the Court, 300 North Dixie Highway, Room 300, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, telephone (561)355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD), or 1-800-955-8770 Via Florida Relay Service. + +CO + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICc ) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trueand correct c oregoing was faxed and mailed this 29th day of March, 2011 to : + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +ACcLail + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, .A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 334 -5 12 + +Marc S.Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +Joserph + +Fla. Bar. + +Lilly A. + +W10743 \ NOIDEP116-Re•NTO Al Discus 3-31-I I.1LA.dosa + +P.A. + +h, Florida 33401 + +802-9044 + +802-9976 + +or Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +SCHEDULE "A" + +1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, including all drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] + +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah 'M +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attom agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential inv, or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein OyOCS or nt Ittany claim + +O + +- b) Adler +- a) Scott Rothstein +- d) c tam Dm- or +- e) Michael Fisten 0 Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Roden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Ric ard.kridreS +- I) Christina Kitte + +Co ) + +"t 9 + +PRESENT: •r• -HUFF - + +At an Ex-Parte Motion Office at the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York at the Courthouse thereof, located at 00 Centre Street qv York,Mew York 10007, on the a: 4t'day of 2011. + +HON. + +LsK&D rs: 574-0133 / 1670111 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for the Issuance of Subpoena for A.J. Di6CALA, to be used in an action entiti JEFFREY S STET IndNIdtaally, J. Individually and L ind v ua y, now A4Ilk pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Jud Circuit, In and for Palm Beach County, Florida + +,ra14/ UPON the reading and filing of the petition of Alison Pighi, Esq. dated January 26, 2011, and the Commission Issued by Circuit Judge David F. of the Circuit Court of the 16° Judicial Circuit, In and for Palm Beach County, Florida. dated January 3, 2011, authorizing the out-of-state deposition of A. J. DIScala; + +NOW, upon the application of Alison Pighi, Esq., dated January 26, 2011, attorney for the petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, it Is hereby, + +ORDERED, that the A.J. DiScala, Is directed to appear and testify as follows: + +x + +I.C°41,7O-ki, O }.O k O rut No.: 100532111 rice &lt;\*k + +• + +p1 + +1%! + +I) + +ORDER PURSUANT TO CPLR § 3102(e) + +x + +- A J. DiScata is directed to appear to testify on February 2 011, at 11:00 a.m. at the law offices of Lester Schwab Katz Dwyer, LIP, 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10271, before + +videographer, Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624-7200, and/or such other dates, times or places to which the same be noticed or continued; further, pursuant to the Subpoena. + +ORDERED, that the personal service of a copy of this Order, together with the Subpoena, upon A.J. DiScala, 303 Park Avenue South, #1401, New York, New York 10010, and service of a copy of the Order and Subpoena by mail or fax on attorneys for all parties in the pending action on or before the 1st day of February, 2011, shall be deemed good and sufficient service. + +ENTER: + +J.S.D. + +CAROL E. HUFF + +FILED + +JAN 26 2011 + +NEW YORK +COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE + +LSK&D #: 574-0133 / 1570165 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +x + +In the Matter of the Application of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for the issuance of Subpoena for Index No.: 100532/11 A.J. DiSCALA, to be used in an action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, SUBPOENA Individually arliRdiji ., l pending individually, J. in the Circuit Court of the 151° Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida 9 + +x C + +#1401 New York, New York 10010 TO: A. J. DiScala 303 Park Avenue South + +4 C. + +WE COMMAND YOU, that al s and excuses being laid aside, you appear at the law offices of Lester Sch b Katz & Dwyer, LLP, 120 Broadway, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10271, on February 22, 2011 at 11:00 a.m., and at any recessed or adjourned date, before videographer, Robert Horgan of Diamond Reporting and Legal Video, 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11241, Telephone No. (718) 624- 7200, to give evidence and testimony on the part of the plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN relating to the action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, J. Individually, and L.M. Individually, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMB AG, now pending in the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. + +Failure to comply with this Subpoena is punishable as a contempt of Court and shall make you liable to the person on whose behalf this subpoena was issued for a + +penalty not to exceed fifty dollars and all damages sustained by reason of your failure to comply. + +Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2011 + +Yours, etc. + +LESTER SCHWAB KATZ R, LLP + +Alison Pighi Attorneys for Petitioner + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN 120 Broadway New York, ew York 10271 c -4267 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5fd12b78f9e848931ac6242b9dd1a0b10e78576 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576/EFTA02769576.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,419 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769576.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 8170, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.32, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 290.274, + 105.40999999999998 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 105.40999999999998 + ], + [ + 538.734, + 149.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 290.274, + 149.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION \nRE- NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.016, + 328.68 + ], + [ + 460.17352294921875, + 328.68 + ], + [ + 460.17352294921875, + 358.60302734375 + ], + [ + 143.016, + 358.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICc )", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 392.88934326171875, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 392.88934326171875, + 315.35302734375 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 315.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.399, + 103.5 + ], + [ + 362.986, + 103.5 + ], + [ + 362.986, + 116.74799999999999 + ], + [ + 277.399, + 116.74799999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 16 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 350 + ], + [ + "Line", + 49 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769576" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769585/EFTA02769585.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769585/EFTA02769585.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..442324d2a7879301b487f60ac0621c78cd9952d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769585/EFTA02769585.md @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s) + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +**NON-PARTY PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER +AND STAY OF ORDER** + +Non-Party Podhurst Orseck, P.A., ("Podhurst") pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(c) and 1.410(c), moves for a protective order in Podhurst's favor as to the Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of Records Custodian of Bankruptcy Trustee Herbert Stettin, Plaintiff Epstein's second Trustee discovery request for additional email production from Defendant [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") in the above-referenced matter, and in the alternative, asks this Court to stay the requested production until such time as this motion can be heard. The grounds for this motion are as follows: + +1. 1. Podhurst, has learned that Jeffrey Epstein has issued a Subpoena Duces Tecum for, *inter alia*, the e-mails of [REDACTED] while he was employed at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). + +2. Upon information and belief this request includes and, if not protected, would allow Jeffrey Epstein to obtain numerous communications between and attorneys from Podhurst that are subject to the attorney work product doctrine, contain attorney-client privileged confidential information and/or are, subject to the common interest privilege (often called the joint defense privilege). These emails were generated while was orking in conjunction with Podhurst in litigation on behalf of their respective die nctoh h claims against Jeffrey Epstein. + +0 3. On the grounds of privilege as set forth in paragraph abo e, movants object to the production of these e-mails, many of which are believed in sensitive and confidential information, as well as thoughts, legal research a Podhurst's clients against Jeffrey Epstein. es pertaining to litigation by + +4. Upon information and belief, to be burdensome to review but it is Sdction would not only be so voluminous as or other counsel with whom he had cmailed — much less the Trustee °tlfll pdrmit Podhurst to conduct such review due to otherwise privileged matter unrelated to P t contained within the body of documents. + +r iN(S 'I ll4r + +Ns) + +&#x27; The joint ense doctrine, also known as the "common interests" doctrine or the "pooled information" doctrine, es lishes an exception to the general rule that the attorney-client privilege is waived upon the voluntary disclosure of the privileged information to a third party. The joint defense doctrine allows parties who share unified interests to exchange privileged information to adequately prepare their cases without losing the protection afforded by the attorney-client privilege. Under this doctrine, attorneys for clients sharing common litigation interests may exchange information freely among themselves without fear that, by their exchange, they will forfeit the protection of the attorney-client privilege. Axiomatic to the "joint defense" doctrine is the existence of multiple parties and also multiple attorneys. In re Indiantown Realty Partners, Ltd. Partnership, Bkrtcy. S.D. Ha. 2001, 270 B.R. 532. See also, Cone v. Culverhouse, 687 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1977); Visual Scene, Inc. v. Pilkington Bros., plc., 508 So. 2d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1987); Springer v. United Services Auto. Ass 'PI, 846 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5ih Dist. 2003). + +5. Courts have broad discretion to limit or prohibit discovery in order to protect a person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood Service, 500 So. 2d 533, 555 (Fla. 1987). + +6. Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.280(e) provides that a trial court may enter an order to protect the person from whom discovery is sought, from ". . . undue burden or expense." + +7. Upon information and belief Jeffrey Epstein has made prior volu i S4iscovery requests in this matter, including 27,000 pages of e-mails, which w erocluced, despite 11 Edward's contention that nearly all of them were entirely irrelevant t Epste s putative case. + +8. We have been informed that Epstein has reque3ted n a ditional 10,214 pages of e-mail messages generated and/or received by dnibthe time in which he was employed at RRA to be produced, including the sqNn oprivileged communications between and Podhurst attorneys. + +9. During the period tha subject communications occurred, and Podhurst represented about two d ng women who had been molested and criminally subjected to prostitution by J cy Epstein. The e-mails between and the Podhurst contain communications ing attorneys' thoughts, legal research, planning and exploration of strategic alte a es in regard to their similar representation of victims of Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein !w liar claims and experiences. Judge Marra consolidated all discovery matters in thesear i e t cases filed in front of Judge Marra of the United States District Court in and for the Southern District of Florida. + +10. We have been informed that due to their volume and their being in the custody of the Trustee in the bankruptcy action involving Scott Rothstein and RRA, these documents have not been stamped and entered in this matter on any privilege log, as a result of which + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein argues they may be subject to production. Non-party Podhurst, requests that this Court enter an order protecting these voluminous, irrelevant, superfluous, confidential and privileged e-mails, or that the Court stay production until such time as Podhurst may be heard on this issue. + +11. Podhurst adopts all applicable portions of IIMI Motion for Prot tive Order, Objections to Cancelled Notice of Deposition Duces Tccum of Records Cus t Trustee Herbert Stettin [January 20, 2011j, and Motion for Appointment of RoO y as Special filed on February 24, 2011. + +12. The undersigned hereby certifies that she has regarding the relief sought by this motion with Jack Goldberger, Esq., counsel for P I%n cry Epstein, who is unable to \' agree to Podhurst's request for protection. + +WHEREFORE, in light of the forego' ,t ti t non-party, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., asks this Court to issue an order of protectio in alternative, an order staying proceedings until such time as this non-party's mot heard by the Court. + +DATED this 31' day o , 2011. + ++o + +Respectfully submitted, + +PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. + +City National Bank Bldg. 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382 + +U C zel— + +Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No.: 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Ha. Bar No.: 114771 rjoscfsbergOpodhurst.com kczeil@podhurst.com + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 31' day of March, 2011, to all counsel/parties listed on the attached Service List. + +Respectfully submitted, + +PODHIJKST ORSECK, P.A. + +City National Bank Bldg. + +25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 8 + +Miami, Florida 33130 \_A, + +Telephone: (305) 358-2t ) + +Facsimile: (305) 358-23 + +By: i9TH day of March, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Phipps Reporting + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +**AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT** + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +Math. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Video Deposition Page 3 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + += Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401- Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Es marc@nuriklaw. Law Offices One E Bro Fort Lau Phon Fax: (954) Nurik d., Suite 700 33301 5-5849 5-3556 + +A + +ass \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769591/EFTA02769591.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769591/EFTA02769591.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e39ab1a8cba75c1ce7437b9c8e355e227708f5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769591/EFTA02769591.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769591.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2484, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.714, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 529.911, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 529.911, + 118.488037109375 + ], + [ + 304.714, + 118.488037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEQ DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 180.886, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 425.08197021484375, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 425.08197021484375, + 352.18853759765625 + ], + [ + 180.886, + 352.18853759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 203.36590576171875, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 203.36590576171875, + 468.05853271484375 + ], + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 468.05853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(t AT AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.19003295898438, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 331.8955383300781, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 331.8955383300781, + 468.42852783203125 + ], + [ + 219.19003295898438, + 468.42852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 453.30389404296875 + ], + [ + 454.9311828613281, + 453.30389404296875 + ], + [ + 454.9311828613281, + 467.37 + ], + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 467.37 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.99, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 378.18899999999996, + 447.93 + ], + [ + 378.18899999999996, + 461.69999999999993 + ], + [ + 66.99, + 461.69999999999993 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.399, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 414.72900000000004, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 414.72900000000004, + 515.97 + ], + [ + 189.399, + 515.97 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 350.6640319824219, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 350.6640319824219, + 158.97802734375 + ], + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 158.97802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769591" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e03364984c2710f622741d5eecc89b2615d6050 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). O + +co + +## DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT A'SpI ASti NAL INTERROGATORY + +The Defendant, J. NIt tFirough the undersigned attorneys, moves this Honorable Court to enter an orde itti g Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to propound an additional interrogatory upon Plai y Epstein, and states: + +- 1. The Supreme C s not approved a form of interrogatories for this type of action. +- 2. ents of the claims asserted and the nature and complexity of the factual circumstance rise to the claims are not susceptible to being adequately covered within the twenty-flvc (2 interrogatory limit. +- 3. The elements of defenses asserted or expected to be asserted are not susceptible to being adequately covered within the twenty-five (25) interrogatory limit. + +4. The use of written interrogatories is the least burdensome, least expensive and most expeditious discovery means available to the Defendant by which to obtain necessary information and narrow trial issues. -1, + +5. The Plaintiff will not be prejudiced through the granting of this on. + +6. The foregoing factors and others to be presented upon this Motion constitute good cause for increasing the number of interrogatories pe itte erein. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant moves for an Order requ rmitting Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to propound an additional interrogatory upon ? rey Epstein. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and con the foregoing has been furnished by fik),I. A& U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list , 2011. + +> Jack S a Flo( a Bar No.: 169440 S 'Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Compel + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 7;" smahoney@agwpa.com 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 C O N Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 'C /C) ') Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire AL Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33 Q - 70 Phone: (561)-802- Fax: (561)-802- Attorneys for s Epstein + +N- + +Marc marc@n aw.com Law Off' of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d545dfd159e2520b3f7a3df6aa5173326be8cb02 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594/EFTA02769594.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769594.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2794, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.74, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.321, + 75.516 + ], + [ + 532.1088256835938, + 75.516 + ], + [ + 532.1088256835938, + 119.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 305.321, + 119.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT A'SpI ASti NAL INTERROGATORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 354.032 + ], + [ + 507.4634094238281, + 354.032 + ], + [ + 507.4634094238281, + 369.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 369.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.547, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 350.3812561035156, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 350.3812561035156, + 147.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.547, + 147.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769594" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..393a99a2574b4ba1348fd08aaa6c45559d72667c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORY +TO PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, hereby provides notice that pursuant to Rule 3340(c), +Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that one (1) Interrogatory has been directed to Plaintiff, Jeffrey +Epstein, this 1st day of April, 2011. + +It is requested that the aforesaid answers be served within thirty (30) days at the offices of +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West +Palm Beach, Florida, 33409. + +2011 APR -5 PM 3:30 +BJC: CLERK +WALM BEACH CIVIL +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by *FAY RED* +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this          day of          April, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + += Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Phone: (954)-524-2820 S' Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L.L. Ackerman Jr., Esqui C ) Burnett, 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Driv P. West Palm Beac 401-6170 Phone: (561 Fax: (561 Attorn e y Epstein + +Marc S. Nufik marc®nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d226c1e605c7e5f3969b0631cbfe788f0849a3f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597/EFTA02769597.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769597.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2090, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.2, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.321, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 531.125, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 305.321, + 145.8 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.283, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 439.46799999999996, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 439.46799999999996, + 381.51 + ], + [ + 163.283, + 381.51 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 163.00000000000003 + ], + [ + 350.7612609863281, + 163.00000000000003 + ], + [ + 350.7612609863281, + 179.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 179.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769597" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e9a9fda61502bfc49d115bab46a92842892d778 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.md @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLARENDA +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXXXXXXX + +FILED +2014 APR 5 PM 3:31 +CIRCUIT COURT CLERK + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S +MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-JUDICIAL +STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. ██████, files this Response and Supporting Legal Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media. + +Epstein in his Motion for Protective Order complains of two articles in the British press which quote the undersigned and urges this Court to impose a gag order to ensure that he receives a fair trial. The focus of the British press' attention on Epstein is a result of public statements of one of Epstein's child victims who lives in Australia. Her mention of Epstein's relationship with Prince Andrew ignited the British press and they have been contacting the undersigned. Neither the undersigned nor his client had any involvement in initiating public comment by the Australian victim who came forward. All of the undersigned's comments have + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 5020INCA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 2 of 10 + +been restricted to matters of public record and have been motivated by a desire to develop additional sources of relevant information in the pending proceedings. Press attention has, in fact, assisted the undersigned and his client in developing potential new witnesses n evidence. Additionally, the undersigned is hopeful that the focus of public attention o Epstein will help to deter his further abuse of children and will encourage other vi witnesses to his past criminal activity to continue to come forward and assist no nl in the pending civil litigation but also in any further criminal investigation that nducted. For these reasons, the undersigned and his client oppose any attempt to ' heir First Amendment Right to make such statements. + +AS Contrary to Epstein's position, a restraiv Speech is simply not necessary to ensure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. T ot yet set for trial and it is highly unlikely that prospective Palm beach Coun tc Pio fi) uld have ever: been exposed to articles in the British press. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen s Motion should be denied because he has failed to meet his burden of establishing a bstantial and imminent threat to his ability to receive a fair trial. Additionally, etas which is co Mut'r )onally impermissible. (See Motion For Protective Order at ¶ 5 stating "all ked this Court to enter a blanket order prohibiting all communication, statements and comments by Mr. Scarola to the press and media must therefore stop immediately"). + +- 1. The Court should not enter any order restraining the speech of any party or person. As the Court is undoubtedly aware: + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 3 of 10 + +Any form of prior restraint of expression comes to a reviewing court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity; therefore, the party who seeks to have such a restraint upheld carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposi of such a restraint. . . . ['no justify a prior restraint, the activity restrained must poser a d present danger or a serious or imminent threat to a protected competing interes n d the t such a restraint cannot be upheld if reasonable alternatives are available. State ex. r mi Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 908 (Fla. 1977). + +Indeed, the United States Supreme Court has h evada's application of its analog to Rule 4-3.6(a) of the Rules Regulating the 5\ o 3ar was unconstitutional when used to con erring a criminal case six months before a nt insights into the constitutional limitations of First Amendment rights: discipline a lawyer who made public state trial. Its analysis of the Rule gi necessarily inherent in any suc + +Model Rule 3.6's requi ent of substantial likelihood of material prejudice is not necessarily flawed. Interfreted in a proper and narrow manner, for instance, to prevent an <7\ attorney of record4rom releasing information of grave prejudice on the eve of jury selection, the phrase subs tial likelihood of material prejudice might punish only speech that creates a danger of imminent and substantial harm. + +Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030, II I S.Ct. 2720, 2725 (1991) ("Gentile") (emphasis added). Repeated throughout the Supreme Court's opinion in Gentile is the concept that any restraint of a lawyer's speech must be based on an imminent threat to the integrity of + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Pagc 4 of 10 + +judicial proceedings. See id. at 2725 (Model Rule 3.6 incorporates a "clear and present danger" standard). + +To emphasize just how "imminent" a threat must be before a court can con titutionally curtail protected speech, the Supreme Court cited its own decision in Mu'M. Vir nia, 500 U.S. 415, 1 1 1 S.Ct. 1899 (1991), which it described this way: + +0 There, the community had been subject to a barrage of publi ty p 'or to Mu'Min's trial for capital murder. News stories appeared over a course months and included, in addition to details of the crime itself, numerous items :. 'al information inadmissible at trial. Eight of the twelve individuals seated o 'I 's jury admitted some exposure to pretrial publicity. We held that the publici se even to a level requiring questioning of individual jurors about the content of In light of that holding, the Nevada court's conclusion that petitioner's ab svi eneral comments six months before trial created a "substantial likelihood of mat iallS, prejudicing" the proceeding is, to say the least, most r unconvincing. 1 I I S.Ct. a + +Thus, it G ile, the Supreme Court found Nevada's application of Rule 3.6 unconstituti d= pite the fact that the subject trial fotowed intense pretrial publicity, a press conferen the disciplined lawyer, and at least 17 articles in the major local newspapers. This was also despite the fact that the disciplined lawyer's admitted purpose in his public statements was to rebut press accounts that tended to exonerate other suspects of the crime with which the lawyer's client was charged. See id. at 2728. Gentile is important and instructive because the Supreme Court recognized that a lawyer has a legitimate right to make extrajudicial statements to + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG DefendanUCounter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 5 of 10 + +advance the interests of his client for a variety of purposes, including countering public opinion, protecting the client's business interests or defending the position and reputation of his client. Id. at 2728-29. + +The Court also noted that: + +Only the occasional case presents a danger of prejudice from p icity. Empirical research suggests that in the few instances when jurors have been sed to extensive and prejudicial publicity, they are able to disregard it and verdict upon the evidence presented in court. . . . Voir dire can play an import minding jurors to set aside outof-court information and to decide the case u evidence present at trial. All of these factors weight in favor of affording an tt e s speech about ongoing proceedings our traditional First Amendment protect p tasis added) Id. at 2734. + +Florida's Rule 4-3.6 is ,-t cont to these important constitutional principles. The Rule contains several safeguards that prevent unconstitutional application. There is no violation iv-----, unless the lawyer c ws , of should know that a statement "will have a substantial likelihood of materially p ' ng) a case "due to its creation of an imminent and substantial detrimental effect o h eeding." As the Comment to the Rule explains, there are vital social interests served by e free dissemination of information about events having legal consequences and about legal proceedings themselves. The public has a rfght to know about threats to its safety and measures aimed at assuring its security. It also has a legitimate interest in the conduct of judicial proceedings, particularly in matters of general public concern. Furthermore, the subject + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 6 of 10 + +matter of legal proceedings is often of direct significance in debate and deliberation of public policy. (emphasis added) + +It cannot be argued that the issues presented in this case do not implicate 4 'a threat to ... :, public safety. The public's intense interest and scrutiny speaks volumes abot t e , scope of the 0 public's concern over the issues raised. + +Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d 999) fully supports Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's reading of Gentile. Of the ourt's decision in Gentile, the Third District said, "The Court held that the 's ullf t ., kelihood of material prejudice standard constitutes a constitutionally permissib nc between the First Amendment rights of attorneys in pending cases and the State' 1 st n fair trials." Thus, in Rodriguez, the Third District overturned a gag order that p communications between a plaintiff's attorney and the press in a medical negligen course, this is the precise remedy sought by Epstein in this case. As the court held, in t ence of evidence of a "substantial and imminent threat to a fair trial," such pro .bition are simply unconstitutional. Id. at 1165. + +2. ,Gag orders in civil cases are unconstitutional unless there is a showing of II,, il prejudice andkutless other alternatives are demonstrably unworkable. Gag orders aimed at , ,77, 147/ \_•• participantstin criminal trials have been found to be constitutionally permissible where the injury to any First Amendment right is outweighed by the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. See, e.g., Dow & Co v. = 842 F.2d 603, 609 (2d Cir. 1988); Radio & Television News Ass'n v. United States District Court, 781 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir.1986). See also News-Journal Corp. v. Foxman, 939 F.2d 1499, 1512-15 (11th Cir. 1991). Relying on the Seventh + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 7 of 10 + +Amendment, the Third Circuit has found that the same analysis governs in civil cases. See v. Systems Innovation, Inc., 852 F.2d 93, 97-98 (3d Cr.1988). Other circuits have stated that civil trials, because of their nature and relatively longer duration, "do not as re t y justify a restriction on speech" as criminal trials. Chicago Council of Lawyers v. Ba r 522 F.2d 242, 257-58 (7th Cir.I975). Accord, Hirschkop v. Snead, 594 F.2d 356, 37 979). It is not necessary, however, for the Court to determine whether greater incu n freedom of speech are constitutionally justifiable in a criminal context than in a ntext because Epstein could never satisfy even the less demanding standard arguabl file to criminal trials. + +Prior to enjoining the speech of trial p ' S ants, a trial court must specifically find, based on the available evidence, that the faitn' oeth e trial is seriously threatened by publicity 3j and that nothing short of a gag order wit,- ce to protect the litigants' right to a fair trial. See ' \ 71' I, Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart 427 Lk& 539, 563-65, 96 S.Ct. 2791 (1976); Dow , 842 I, \ ir F.2d at 611; Radio & Television ews Ass'n, 781 F.2d at 1448 (Nelson, J., concurring). As the Third District Court f Amal \-\ said in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Morphonios, 467 So. 2d 1026, 1030 (F ail , A 1985), "Trial courts must set out, in detail, findings that substantial prejudice defendant will result from the pretrial publicity, that no less restrictive altematives,r(e.g., a thorough and sensitive voir dire or the careful exercise of peremptory challenges) are available that restraint is the only effective method of protecting legitimate and compelling interests." The evidence submitted by Epstein in support of his motion serves merely to chronicle statements made or attributed to Plaintiff's counsel in two articles in the British + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Judicial Statements Page 8 of 10 + +press. There exists not a shred of evidence tending to prove the decisive issue, that being the statements in some way effect Epstein's ability to receive a fair trial. + +3. Gag Orders must be narrowly tailored tc achieve the objective sought or they are constitutionally impermissible. In Rodriguez, supra, the Third District overtu a blanket gag order that precluded all communications between a plaintiff's attomey an the press in a medical negligence case. The Rodriguez Court noted that the Order was not narrowly tailored to achieve the objective sought, and therefore was constitutionally impe issible. 734 So. 2d at 1165. The jr\V Rodriguez Court noted that following Gentile, both fedararand state courts have found that gag orders are only proper if the restraint on speech it narrowly tailored. Id. In this case it appears that Epstein may indeed be seeking a blanket qrder prohibiting all communications, which is simply not permitted. In his motion/1\*c \_states in S 5 that "all statements and comments by Mr. Scarola to the press and media musl therefore stop." + +this Co Wher c fote;)the7 \ Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. respectfully requests rner) an Order denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media. + +"tr + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra- +Judicial Statements + +Page 9 of 10 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 4th day of April, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards + +NOTA CERTIFIED + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Extra- +Judicial Statements + +Page 10 of 10 + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b86c5af07fc162669a609607c777478013691bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600/EFTA02769600.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,386 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769600.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 16242, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLARENDA FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.327, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 524.958, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 524.958, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 306.327, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.035, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 537.138, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 537.138, + 378.27 + ], + [ + 70.035, + 378.27 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.998, + 150.144 + ], + [ + 349.566, + 150.144 + ], + [ + 349.566, + 164.01600000000002 + ], + [ + 256.998, + 164.01600000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 42 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769600" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81c911bbf492456ac4c9991bdee9b446cfc1d3fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING Dalai! + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi take the deposition of: ey or an attorney of the firm will + +Name: + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +Upon oral ex I, `I notary publ c'er\_officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral before HI TECH/UNITED REPORTING, Notary Public, or any other examinati will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +••••••• o rn 0: 7> c7 • ESQ n ecR —2r— CO r- rn -my) + +ednesday, April 20, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed, faxed and emailed on this /o#ti day of April, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart + +& Shipley, Attorneys for I 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully s bmitted, + +L. Ac Jr. e t—rt-- `4I Fla. Bar No. 235954 A\_\_,J, BURNETT P.A. ,\ West Palm Beach, FL 33401 CO AS 9 ( Se ivy@unitedreporting.net + +Mint + +(561) 802-9044 + +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 + +(561) 802-9976 + +cc: + +Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. + +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue + +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 + +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 + +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac77fc71a669edbc435532fcbdef1fd216035180 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610/EFTA02769610.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769610.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1817, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.711, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 539.5740000000001, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 539.5740000000001, + 128.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 291.711, + 128.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING Dalai!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.92499999999998, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 408.03000000000003, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 408.03000000000003, + 334.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 197.92499999999998, + 334.8580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769610" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7cc98d95178c4930b59438c4e68a520eb4cb721 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████ individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +NAME AND ADDRESS + +DATE AND TIME + +LOCATION + +Alfred Seckel + +May 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. +PST (12:00 pm EST) + +Esquire Solutions +Suite 500 +1875 Century Park East +Los Angeles, CA 90067 + +upon oral examination before Esquire Deposition Services, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of California. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +2011 APR - 7 PM 3:48 +SHARON F. BECK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +FILED + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +E-Mail and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of April, +2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2439 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +cc: Esquire Solutions + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +## AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need o a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Re anager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven prior to the + +CO proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. 4 C) + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Taking Deposition + +4 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] [REDACTED].com +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7b7821d8462a7a1a71b4cf29c624b9ed08bf039 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612/EFTA02769612.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769612.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 2900, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.212, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 531.462, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 531.462, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 304.212, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.14399999999999, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 400.56600000000003, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 400.56600000000003, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 75.14399999999999, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.20400000000001, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 210.28199999999998, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 210.28199999999998, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 81.20400000000001, + 483.57 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.88400000000001, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.874, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 350.874, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 250.88400000000001, + 483.57 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 491.466, + 469.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 491.466, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 483.57 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.17, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 419.01190185546875, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 419.01190185546875, + 189.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 188.17, + 189.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.126, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 347.844, + 145.8 + ], + [ + 347.844, + 159.57000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.126, + 159.57000000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769612" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5b97be5031bad708aadd006a41b22bfbf14eb2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.md @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff; + +v. + +individually, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +ASI r + +II nc cn CO + +r O ) ° + +## / N TI F HEARING- U + +'.../ + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersign \ down for hearing before the Honorable David F. IM, one of the Judges o a styled Court, in the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie High , om 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 8:45 a foll wing: + +Defendants. + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEF ORDER TO PRECLUD PLAINTIFF FROM MAKIN TO THE MEDIA AND P FREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE G COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER- -JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY S, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES + +I hereby ce th have made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this earing. + +PL VERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In cordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355- 4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via U.S. Mail this ~~4th~~ day of April, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Gary [REDACTED], Esquire, [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, #2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +![]()[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 +Christopher E. Knight +Fla. Bar. No. 607363 + +FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W:\80743\NOTHRG30-Epstein's MPO on Extra-Judicial Statements-CEK.docx + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE14.1Y 4/ EP STEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FAIOM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO TICE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN'), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states! + +I. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitle€1 cted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal investigation and is in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit I]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. + +2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: + +- a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." +- b. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United States for sex." +- c. "We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr. Epstein while Mr.;,- Epstein has been in the company of under-aged children." + +[Exhibit I]. + +3. That same day, the Palm Beach Daily News published an article entitled "Jeffrey Epstein address book 'Holy Grail' of famous manes." [Exhibit 21. This article refers to the fact that "[t]he British press has been having a fieldtday digging up new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." [Exhibit 2]. + +4. Two days later, another British publication, "The Observer," reported: " lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last weak Mat his team intended to try and get a statement from the / prince [Andrew] about what he may'or may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein." [Exhibit 3]. + +5. ty published comments by Mr. Scarola are clearly generating other articles about EPS-MtN. All statements and comments by Mr. Scarola to the press and media must therefo immediately. + +6. This Court has the undeniable discretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State cx. ml, Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See \$heppard v. + +Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, l6 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966). Sentinel Communications Cr 'L=1, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between lawyers and/or litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishjna Co. v. McIntosh, 34O So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspaper. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). + +7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognize Sat restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: + +> Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants and officials directly affected by court proceedings may be made at the court's discretion.... Mtizzling lawyers who may wish to make public statements ... has long been recognized as within the court's inherent power to control professional conduct. + +State cx rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v, McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 91O. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated: "Prohibition on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom Newspapen, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (order prohibiting public comment on evidence and charges against two defendants by members of state attorney's office and sheriff's wag proper preventive measure where prejudicial publicity threatened to impair the right to a fair trial). + +a. Any communications by Mr. Jack Scarola and Mr. as N>, atioWeys and officers of the court, with the media and press arc also limited by the requirements of Rule 4.3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6, entitled "Trial Publicity," states: + +> (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be + +disseminated by means of public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding due to its creation of an imminent and substantial detrimental effect on that proceeding. + +(b) Statements of Third Parties. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to make such a statement. Counsel shall exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, employees, or other persons assisting in or associated with a case from making, extrajudicial statements that are prohibited under this rule." + +9. Rule 4-3.6 incorporates the "substantial likelihood-of material prejudice" standard that the United States Supreme Court found to be a "constitutionally permissible balance between the First Amendment rights of attorneys in\_peuding crises and the state's interest in fair trials" Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada 501 U.S. I030, 1075, Ill S. Cl. 2720, 2745, 115 L. Ed, 2d 888 (1991). + +10. In a letter of March 18, 2011, in an effort to conserve this Court's time and resources, undersigned counsel requested Mr. Scarola to enter into a written agreement guaranteeing that Mr. Scaroht. Mr. and their respective agents and employees will not engage in any extra-judichd commentary concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with females. + +e undersigned's efforts have not unfortunately, been successful. An e-mail r41135519\to the above March 18, 2011 letter was received on March 21, 2011 rejecting the request. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. J. a and their respective agents and employees, from participating, encouraging, assisting, or abetting in the dissemination of any out-of-court publicity or extra-judicial statements and commentary to the media and press concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females. Additionally, the requested Protective Order should direct all parties and their ccunsel, and their respective agents and employees, not to participate, encourage, assist, or abet in the disseminatio publicity, statement and commentary in this matter which is injurious to reputation. out-of-court + +Respect tI c, + +elkNoseith Ackerman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +and + +E. Knight 63 BURNETT' P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this jeday of March, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 C O + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Anerbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +> By: -1 111rOnght, Esq. 1 a. . ar o. 607363 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a474eb3b7a2e4e5318679e215d1ee8bad9a50d93 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616/EFTA02769616.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769616.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 10524, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.25, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.652, + 46.227000000000004 + ], + [ + 463.0799865722656, + 46.227000000000004 + ], + [ + 463.0799865722656, + 76.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 146.652, + 76.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "/ \nN TI F HEARING- U", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.554, + 282.6137390136719 + ], + [ + 383.598, + 282.6137390136719 + ], + [ + 383.598, + 314.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 217.554, + 314.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JE14.1Y 4/ EP STEIN'S MOTION \nFOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FAIOM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL \nSTATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO TICE MEDIA AND PRESS, \nWITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.62399999999998, + 333.73999999999995 + ], + [ + 496.5357666015625, + 333.73999999999995 + ], + [ + 496.5357666015625, + 399.71405029296875 + ], + [ + 123.62399999999998, + 399.71405029296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.734, + 140.52399999999997 + ], + [ + 384.8437194824219, + 140.52399999999997 + ], + [ + 384.8437194824219, + 156.72406005859375 + ], + [ + 235.734, + 156.72406005859375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769616" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b5185e8dd6bfad5b35da8202d1e97e0a0400ba6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. , Individually + +Defendant. + +CA - 0 + +a-: + +## MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE AMENDED COMPLAINT + +The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby moves for a z two business day extension of time -- up to,G0,incIading April 12, 2011 -- in which to serve an Amended Complaint, and in support tctet'JwouId show as follows: + +- I. At the hearing hitter on April 1, 2011, the Court requested that the Plaintiff attempt to streamline t igation with an Amended Complaint and the Plaintiff has been diligently attempting tD comply with the Court's Order; +- 2. The Court ordered that the Plaintiff serve an Amended Complaint no later than April 8, 2 ltd -that Defendants respond five (5) days thereafter; + - 3. This litigation involves complex legal and factual issues; +- 4. Due to various unexpected matters which arose this week which required the attention of undersigned counsel, undersigned counsel has been unable to complete the Amended Complaint by the due date and respectfully requests an additional two business days -- up to and + +including April 12, 2011 -- in which to serve an Amended Complaint. Defendants would then have five (5) days to serve a response. + +5. This request is not made for purposes of delay and will not prejudice the Defendants. Plaintiff will attempt to resolve this motion without the need for a hearing but, given the time constraints, has not as yet been able to do so. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter tl AlemAtxtending the time for serving an Amended Complaint up to and including April 12 0,s + +Respectfully submitted, + +14/ 2 1 • ?hv i sepK L. Ackerman,, Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, Fourteenth Floor 395 Brickell Avenue tam i, Florida 33131 velephone: (305) 789-9200 )Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +First Class mail Broward t. Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney a et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. I HEREBY CERTIrtihat a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent by email and day of April, 2011 to: Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East + +) n .:Nefri, • -2( Joe ph L. Ackerman, Jr. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08b19b50d7f887d1431ec1407c8f4aaf45e67ea0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624/EFTA02769624.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769624.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2493, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10799999999998, + 47.096 + ], + [ + 464.4708557128906, + 47.096 + ], + [ + 464.4708557128906, + 76.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 148.10799999999998, + 76.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.478, + 323.176 + ], + [ + 512.6867065429688, + 323.176 + ], + [ + 512.6867065429688, + 339.863037109375 + ], + [ + 93.478, + 339.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.16, + 475.017 + ], + [ + 382.4980773925781, + 475.017 + ], + [ + 382.4980773925781, + 490.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 218.16, + 490.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769624" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ceab57f89467e045802e33fd12190a30ab0596e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.md @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +## CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE CIOAO PREVENT VIDEO DEPOSITION , + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein moves the Co lyn of a protective order, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, to p t th taking on April 13, 2011 of Mr. Epstein's further deposition which Defendant ("EM') has noticed over the Plaintiffs objection. The groun C r otion are: + +- 1. On or about Marc , 2011, counsel to :Edwards noticed the video deposition of the Plaintiff for Apr'l 13,''0PI in West Palm Beach, Florida to retake the deposition of the Plaintiff, desp that he was advised by Plaintiffs counsel that the Plaintiff was unavailabl is time and that there was no basis for the taking of a second deposition when the tiff had already been deposed in 2010. A copy of the Notice is attached as Exhibit +- A. +- 2. The Plaintiff seeks a protective order to prevent his further deposition at this time because (a) he has already been deposed at length; (b) no meaningful grounds have been alleged to justify the taking of a second deposition other than the unsubstantiated assertion that the + +r rn rJ + +Plaintiff has somehow waived his rights under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which he has not; and (c) the timing is in conflict with the Court's recent order requiring the filing of new pleadings by all parties which may determine the scope of inquiry. Moreover, the taking of a video deposition in light of the publicity surrounding these parties would be particularly prejudicial to the Plaintiff who is also seeking in a separate motion an order preventing counsel from discussing this case with the media. A vid osition is truly fodder for intemet gossip machines and can be of no benefit to any pC) + +3. Rule 1.280(c) affords the Court discretion to grant rote 've orders for good cause shown and to protect a party from annoyance, embarrass p ssion, or undue burden or expense. See also Logitech Cargo v. JW , 800. 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). / \ Moreover, the Court may determine the time and place 'of a deposition. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(c)(2). In this case, the Court should det s.phit whether a further deposition of the Plaintiff is justified or necessary and whether vid ' a c pr er medium. + +WHEREFORE, for the abo s t easons, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein moves for entry of a protective order to preventing et i g of his deposition again as noticed by Plaintiff on April 13, 2011 and for such otht4f as the Court deems proper in the circumstances. + +S TIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 8th day of 11 to Gary M. =, Jr., Esq., =, Jaffee, Weissing, M, Fistos, et al, 425 N. An rews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +itcken , Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 AS Facsimile: (561) 802-99J6 WA80743\MTNPRO93-to prevent deposition of Plaintiff in April -.11.A.domi + +901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +#29.1874/mcp + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +• Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +thCOri-mrarsilEnv individually, J. individually, and L. ., individually, + +I + +I Defendant(s). + +i / + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)CCON BAG + +# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION + +TO All counsel on the attached Counsel + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +### NAME AND ADDRESS PATE AND TIME LOCATION + +I Jeffrey Epstein April 13, 2011 Searcy Denney, et al 9:30 a.m. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, WPB + +VIDEOGRAPH:ER: To be arranged by Phipps Reporting + +upon oral examination before Phipps Reporting, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by kaw to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the aPF licable Statutes or Rules. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Video Deposition +Page 2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 307 day of March, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Phipps Reporting + +E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED + +AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +IMMadi,i. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Nonce of Taking Video Deposition Pair 3 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Att6rbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 211 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 W st Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 FaA: (561)-835-8691 + +Parana, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Leman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Pout Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +Jos h L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 771 S Flag CT Drive Wept Palm Beach, FL 33401-61 Phdrie: (561)-802-9044 i( Fat: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc®nuriklaw.com La+ Offices of Marc S. Nurik E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 For? Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phcine: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +Go \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c301c6aab6022d37ead4b25d98ded2c8b0284573 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626/EFTA02769626.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,483 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769626.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 6211, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.94, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.046, + 63.756 + ], + [ + 461.09088134765625, + 63.756 + ], + [ + 461.09088134765625, + 94.10302734375 + ], + [ + 146.046, + 94.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL DIVISION \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG \nJudge David F.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 105.984 + ], + [ + 413.0949401855469, + 105.984 + ], + [ + 413.0949401855469, + 149.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 149.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE CIOAO PREVENT VIDEO \nDEPOSITION ,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 93.92999999999999, + 329.54400000000004 + ], + [ + 506.8061218261719, + 329.54400000000004 + ], + [ + 506.8061218261719, + 358.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 93.92999999999999, + 358.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.73, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 400.8680725097656, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 400.8680725097656, + 526.85302734375 + ], + [ + 236.73, + 526.85302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.59799999999998, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 421.67486572265625, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 421.67486572265625, + 353.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 190.59799999999998, + 353.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS PATE AND TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.40799999999999, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 449.0454406738281, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 449.0454406738281, + 460.3535461425781 + ], + [ + 87.40799999999999, + 460.3535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 447.3589999999999, + 446.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 447.3589999999999, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 381.19599999999997, + 458.46 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.945, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 376.34, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 376.34, + 449.55000000000007 + ], + [ + 81.945, + 449.55000000000007 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 197.275, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 412.76, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 412.76, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 197.275, + 498.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 263.004, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 353.15374755859375, + 160.38 + ], + [ + 353.15374755859375, + 174.83905029296875 + ], + [ + 263.004, + 174.83905029296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769626" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..065e24a00d1d58a4c285caa04f7163e7e888e560 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.md @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +TO: All Counsel of Record + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the unde Procedure 1.310(bX4), will take the video depo • • uant to Florida Rule of Civil + +NAME + +AJ DiScala 303 Park Ave. #1401 New York, NY 10010 DATE AN + +Th 10: + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +## RE -NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION D Cg )TECUM :viva + +r 2- + +PLACE + +Dewey LeBoeuf 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 + +\*The deponent has been instructed to bring with him all documents listed in Schedule A attached hereto. < + +upon oral ex before DIAMOND REPORTING AND LEGAL VIDEO, a Notary Public, or befo er officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. + +The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes, Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons r of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, within a reaso rior to any proceeding contact the Administrative Office of the Court, 300 North D' way, Room 300, West Palm Beach FL 33401, telephone (561)355-2431, 1 9 71 (TDD), or 1400-955-8770, via Florida Relay Service. + +## ERTIFICATE F SER + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and corre1 S 141t e foregoing was mailed, faxed and emailed this WAday of April, 2011 to : + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Ship 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Wjiss, P. . 250 Australian Avenue So Suite 1400 West Palm Beach 3401.5012 +0 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +![]()Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()Fla. Bar No. 195677 + +![]()![]()777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Eacsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +*Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff* + +Cc: Diamond Reporting & Legal Video + +W:\80743\Discovery\NTD- DT AJ Discala-ReNotice NY + +SCHEDULE "A" + +1. 1. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +1. 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, including all drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] Edwards +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah [REDACTED] +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) Patrick [REDACTED] +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- l) Christina Kitterman + +1. 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) [REDACTED] Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] + +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Bilia +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the following attorneys, e es or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investm any laim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) William Berger +- g) David Boden +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +CO + +1% 9 + ++u \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fb222acb11ed847c87746a668ba1b44d91cdc89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632/EFTA02769632.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769632.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4405, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 282.862, + 73.98299999999999 + ], + [ + 533.607666015625, + 73.98299999999999 + ], + [ + 533.607666015625, + 118.98248291015625 + ], + [ + 282.862, + 118.98248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE -NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION D Cg )TECUM :viva", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.972, + 296.745 + ], + [ + 512.39501953125, + 296.745 + ], + [ + 512.39501953125, + 313.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 118.972, + 313.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ERTIFICATE F SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 311.33000000000004 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 311.33000000000004 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 327.2325134277344 + ], + [ + 216.69899999999998, + 327.2325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 111.35400000000001 + ], + [ + 340.527, + 111.35400000000001 + ], + [ + 340.527, + 123.81899999999999 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 123.81899999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "ListGroup", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 20 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769632" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c94b215cd6b60db801781dc8e13c8980d2ec2ef8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually + +Defendants + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXX\_MBAG + +"G'. lc-Fa 7r: 1 33 TZ; 0 C; c c) rf ..44(n; •••••• r + +## ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT ST + +THIS MATTER, came before this Court o I \,,, n tAS9 011, on the Court's own Motion for Case Management Status. This Court having lc 8q0, e , e case management submissions, desiring for a more orderly and consistent appr to p sent outstanding motions, and being otherwise advised, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +- 1. The heari sently scheduled for this Court, Epstein's Motion to Compel scheduled for Apt 011, Motion for Protective Order, scheduled for April 8, 2011, and Court Ord' Management Conference scheduled for April 15, 2011 are canceled. e Court sets aside the entire day of Thursday, May 19, 2011 beginning at 9:30 a.m. to handle all motions relating to discovery and privilege issues. + - 3. The Plaintiff is directed to serve an Amended Complaint on or before April 8, 2011. + - 4. The Defendant is directed to serve an answer to the Amended Complaint on or before + +April 13, 2011. + +5. Within seven (7) days from the date this Order is entered, the parties are directed to prepare a joint statement listing all pending discovery motions and motions relating to privilege issues to be heard on May 19, 2011, and submit it to the Court. + +6. Any additional motions relating to discovery or privilege issues that are to be heard on May 19, 201, are to be filed on or before May 2, 2011. Any response thereto shall be filed by May 9, 2011. + +7. On or before May 6, 2011, counsel for the parties are to t the Court an updated list of all motions to be heard on May 19, 2011. + +8. The moving party for each motion shall deliv< tot court on or before May 11, 2011 a copy of their motion, any response to that motio sed order with self-addressed stamped envelopes. + +DONE AND ORDERED this IC - Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Flo 'ofcLy 2011 in at West + +Copies furnished: ( S s, + +All Counsel he Service List + +DAVID Circuit Judge + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA0408001ODaMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. umett, P.A. 901 oint West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +WA80743 10+e r on Case Management Sistrs-11.4 docx + +A \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d66c9f65e89b51664123583afae0aac6b8521ded --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637/EFTA02769637.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769637.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2684, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.83, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.675, + 74.704 + ], + [ + 540.7593994140625, + 74.704 + ], + [ + 540.7593994140625, + 118.60302734375 + ], + [ + 318.675, + 118.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT ST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.672, + 310.996 + ], + [ + 424.8999999999999, + 310.996 + ], + [ + 424.8999999999999, + 326.363037109375 + ], + [ + 179.672, + 326.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 107.07 + ], + [ + 348.8912658691406, + 107.07 + ], + [ + 348.8912658691406, + 124.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 124.73248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769637" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df46733560219ab3f6bef17e079c54f83723c62b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOCXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. , individually, + +Defendants. C nin 7,a3a G + +e.- ,C4 + +cal o + +PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCT RIL 7,'N,./ Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 1.3 5\ iv. P., reques t J. M, produce for inspection and '4• g , t e documents identifieditelow within the time limits provided by the Rule at the o f undersigned. .10 • \* + +## I. DE IN AND INSTRUCTIONS + +4 + +1. "Document" m s 96 ument known to you and every such document which can be located or discovered b bly diligent efforts; any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or ntrol, uding, but not limited to, any printed, written, recorded, taped, electronic (e-mails hic, or other tangible matter from whatever source, however produced or reprod , et er in draft or otherwise, whether sent or received or neither, including the origi1 1, all amendments and addenda and any non-identical copy (whether different from because of notes made on or attached to such copy or otherwise) of any and all Ming correspondence, letters, telegrams, facsimile communications, cables, notes, notations, ewsletters, memoranda, inter-office communications, releases, agreements, con , pamphlets, studies, minutes of meetings, recordings or other memorials of any type of pe I or telephone conversations, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and long distance charge slips), reports, analyses, evaluations, estimates, projections, forecasts, receipts, statements, accounts, books of account, diaries, calendars, desk pads, appointment books, stenographer's notebooks, transcripts, ledgers, registers, worksheets, journals, statistical records, cost sheets, summaries, lists, tabulations, digests, cancelled or uncanceled checks or drafts, vouchers, charge slips, invoices, purchase orders, accountant's reports, financial statements, newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and any material underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record whatsoever. + +2. "Referring to", "reflecting", "supporting", "evidencing" or "relates to" means in any way directly or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +3. "And" and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to bring within the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. + +4. "Epstein" means the Plaintiff. + +5. "Defendant", "you" and/or "a means J. agent or for and any other person acting or purporting to act for, or on behalf wards or under authority or control. + +6. "Complaint" refers to the initial pleading or Complaint fi action and any amended pleadings. AStintiff in this + +7. All other terms are defined as they are in the Complai + +8. Any document as to which a claim of privile will be asserted should be identified by author, signatory, description (e.g., letter, me facsimile, recording, etc.), title (if any), date, addresses (if any), general subjec nt depository and present custodian and a complete statement of the ground for f privilege should be set forth. + +9. If you maintain that any docum requested has been destroyed, set forth the contents of the document, the date of ction and the name of the person who authorized or directed such destruction. + +10. If any of the docum ted cannot be produced in full, produce to the extent possible, specifying the e inability to produce the remainder. + +11. In responding following document requests, please specify which documents are responsive &each request and, where appropriate, to each sub-part thereof. + +12. This uest a continuing one. If after producing documents, you become aware of any further res 'ye documents, you are requested to produce such additional documents. + +13. previously if so nu maintain that documents responsive to any Request contained herein have uced in response to an earlier Request, so state and provide the bate-number + +14. Unless otherwise stated, the time period for this request is from May 1, 2010 through the date of service. + +## REQUESTS + +1. All documents reflecting any allegedly public statements regarding "his criminal activity" as referenced by counsel to Defendant March 14, 2011 to Plaintiff's counsel Ackerman. made by Plaintiff in an email of + +2. All documents reflecting or tending to support Defendant Plaintiff waived his Fifth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. position that + +3. All documents reflecting or tending to support Defendant position that Plaintiff has lost his Fifth Amendment rights by operation of law or otherwise c ' t by waiver. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy o day of April, 2011 to Gary M. In Jr., Esq., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, F. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australi Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33 Scarola et al., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bo 33409. egoinwi s mailed this 7th ing, , Fistos, et al, , Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., South, Suite 1400, West Palm Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney . Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL + +CO + +Y1.O:1 + +seph L. Ackerman, Jr. v Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e95f11b9c74491f538078d1e7e7ef80e123cd8b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640/EFTA02769640.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769640.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 5553, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.046, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 461.9599914550781, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 461.9599914550781, + 74.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 146.046, + 74.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DE IN AND INSTRUCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.918, + 419.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 422.4066467285156, + 419.5249938964844 + ], + [ + 422.4066467285156, + 433.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 213.918, + 433.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 284.82, + 100.188 + ], + [ + 351.9097900390625, + 100.188 + ], + [ + 351.9097900390625, + 116.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 284.82, + 116.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.582, + 284.004 + ], + [ + 394.0354309082031, + 284.004 + ], + [ + 394.0354309082031, + 300.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 240.582, + 300.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769640" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..961865b4010f3dbc5c244c59ad4cdef2d20d3652 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +VS. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. IL Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMIMG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +41:74rn N + +## AGREED ORDER GRANTING RG'S VERIFIEIr MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO AP 0 HAC VICE + +THIS CAUSE, having come before the C Weinberg's Verified Motion for Admission to Appear Pro Hac Vice Pursuan Ion ar Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510. The Court having reviewed the pl 1 the supporting verified statements of Michael Weinberg, and being otherwise fittly in the premises, + +IT IS HEREBY ORDEUS), that Weinberg is admitted to this Court for this case Pro Hac Vice. Mr. Wein g I be included on all Certificates of Service and sent to Weinberg, P.C. Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, U 02116. + +ORDERED this day of ( Palm Beac County, Florida. \_011 at West Palm Beach, + +Copies furnished: All Counsel on attached Service List + +DAVI Circuit Judge + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800XXXXAMAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 \?\* O4 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, IN 02116 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5d9ed209e59613bc4675a2f3a02f8b10caf6787 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643/EFTA02769643.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769643.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1508, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER GRANTING RG'S VERIFIEIr \nMOTION FOR ADMISSION TO AP 0 HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.50399999999999, + 326.23199999999997 + ], + [ + 499.2981872558594, + 326.23199999999997 + ], + [ + 499.2981872558594, + 355.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 111.50399999999999, + 355.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.44100000000003, + 114.264 + ], + [ + 363.0882873535156, + 114.264 + ], + [ + 363.0882873535156, + 130.10302734375 + ], + [ + 273.44100000000003, + 130.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769643" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ff1dc8b9e9038855bc2eeef8b599ce7d4edd4f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.md @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@ +this action against the Defendants, Scott Rot .4\ ') and alleges: The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by a nSt t his undersigned attorneys, files (" Milstein"), and J. + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +#### CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +#### AMENDED COMPLAI + +-r1 IT. ci + +## '4 , INTRODUCTION + +This litigation has its sii he creation and operation of a criminal \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed to inject s into the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA"), to perso lye is Rothstein and others at RRA, and to raise capital to fund the prosecution ofcc l t C ims against Epstein for alleged sexual assault and battery by defrauding investors i urchasing interests in assignments of alleged structured settlements, including \_21\ those reached by RRA for clients with claims against Epstein, all to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendants Scott Rothstein and made improper use of the judicial system and civil process by inter alia engaging in unreasonable and vexatious discovery in the underlying actions against Epstein, making unfounded allegations in the underlying actions, using improper + +investigatory tools, interfering with a Non Prosecution Agreement, and causing damages to Epstein. The conduct perpetrated by Defendants epitomizes the tort of abuse of process. + +#### GENERAL ALLEGATIONS + +1. This is an action for damages in excess of fifteen thousand dollars (\$15,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs. + +2. Plaintiff is domiciled in Palm Beach County, Florida. + +3. Defendant Rothstein was at all times relevant a res. Wroward County, Florida, and the chairman, managing partner and chief executive oThcef of a law firm called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), whose mai in Broward County. + +4. Defendant is a resident of 'ounty, Florida, and is licensed to practice law in the state of Florida. + +5. At all times material to this action,was a shareholder in RRA. + +1. + +# e Ponzi Scheme + +6. During 2009 R hstein d others pursued a course of criminal conduct which included a scheme to defraud various investors into purchasing interests in assignments of 7 alleged structured ttlements purportedly reached on behalf of RRA for clients, including clients who had clai s inst the Plaintiff, in exchange for immediate payments to these clients of a discountedultp sum amount. + +7. The purpose of the investments was to enrich Rothstein personally along with other members of RRA, to sustain the daily operations of RRA, and specifically, among other things, to raise capital to fund the prosecution of claims against the Plaintiff. + +8. At or near the time that Rothstein and others were pursuing this Ponzi scheme, RRA was also bringing actions against Epstein in three civil cases, alleging sexual assault and + +battery. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 ("Jane Doe") U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50-2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Action?). + +9. The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defe + +10. At the same time, in support of the massive Ponzi schelle, t othstein made various representations to potential investors regarding the Epstein alleged claims against Epstein, including, but not limited to, the f lio as well as other + +> (1) That RRA had sophisticated ping equipment; + +(2) That RRA had a t enforcement officers, including a former sheriff, equipment and sift through a potential defend could be used to benefit RRA clients by enh gators consisting of former law se this sophisticated eavesdropping ge looking for damaging evidence that slue of their clients' claims; + +(3) That Ro had meetings with the alleged victims of Epstein's assaults and their families regardingjltg c d settlements; + +(4) and that investors who funded when Epstein paid the greater am ictims would take a lesser settlement if paid promptly ly payments would be paid their investment plus a return ts to settle the claims; + +(5) That in addition to the Epstein Actions, many anonymous women were lined up to sclllt with pstein and many had claims for hundreds of millions of dollars; + +V 6) That RRA attorneys would sue Epstein and disclose embarrassing informati pstein, his family, friends and associates unless Epstein paid exorbitant settlem + +(7) That if the potential investors did not make investments as promised on a strict timetable, RRA risked being fired and would lose the cases they had against Epstein to other lawyers; and + +(8) That one of the RRA clients felt that Rothstein had lied to her repeatedly about funding, and that she was one step away from going to another lawyer and going to The Florida Bar. + +II. RRA employed a team of skilled investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and former Broward County Sheriff and felon Ken Jenne ("Jenne"). + +12. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to reported to and Rothstein regarding their investigations of Epstein. and + +13. In October, 2009, Rothstein directed investigative te bring case files into a conference room at RRA to be examined by potential investo S. ten i and Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as non eteen boxes. + +14. Kretschmar ("Kretschmar") was a representau t \_of one of the investor groups who was permitted by Rothstein to look at the E Jenne had stacked around the conference room. file boxes that Fisten and + +15. Illinois attorney, Michael Leg Ritchie, were also invited to examine E that allegedly contained the name airplanes. Mr. Legamaro and his client, hedge fund operator Thane files and a flight log displayed by Rothstein celebrities claimed to have flown on Epstein reviewed both the log and the case files in the offices of RRA. + +16. Th Epstein [case files were displayed to potential investors in RRA's office to show them tIfi the cases against Epstein were real and were actually pending and that the `\* allege actually existed. + +17. brought the clients Jane Doe #1, EW and LM to RRA when he joined the firm in the spring of 2009. + +18. Rothstein approved incurring costs between \$110,0004200,000 on the Epstein Actions and supported his efforts to use all available resources of RRA, including its investigator team, in pursuing the Epstein Actions. + +19. Although has given sworn deposition testimony that few attorneys at RRA were directly involved in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, the only privilege log prepared by clearly reflects that more than 18 RRA lawyers were involved in prosecuting the Epstein Actions. Additionally, four RRA investigators and several legal assistants and paralegals were involved in the Epstein matters. Aftec + +20. On multiple occasions, many RRA attorneys conferred and lirRinvolved i with was aware that o ices were audio monitored and recorded, including discussions on a speakerphone. GI 4ie interdependence of so many RRA lawyers, investigators, and other staff, wide communications that necessarily accompanied the involvement of so m A known, that his Epstein case files were being d touted to investors, particularly where the magnitude of the potential settlements • Lein Actions was a key selling point. the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. knew, or should have + +21. Rothstein and others vt investors to put up money to realize a substantial return emanating from the frau ement of the Epstein cases and others. + +22. In Novem 2009, RRA collapsed and ultimately went into bankruptcy and Rothstein voluntai relin uished his law license and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court. + +2INSI4Sequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in federal court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for fraud and racketeering, based on an alleged \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his own pockets, and those of his cohorts. + +## The Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement + +24. In September, 2007, long prior to the collapse of RRA, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with the federal government. Material terms of the agreement included, but were not limited to, the following: + +- (1) a registered sex offender; incarceration; Epstein would plead guilty to a state felony charge ancligree to be + - (2) Epstein agreed to accept an eighteen (1O n sentence of + - (3) Epstein would serve a period of one ye unity Control; +- (4) Epstein agreed to waive lia1 alleged victims who sued exclusively under 18 USC §2255; +- (5) The United States w d rosecute Epstein for any federal offenses including, but not limited to, the allegat' n 4 sexual assault; and +- (6) The United S t tail5ed the ability to prosecute Epstein up until 90 days after Epstein completed his obli c ' ar, ns er the NPA. + +25. Epstein fully compli 4th e terms of the NPA. Epstein made payments to the alleged victims identified in and their attorneys. Epstein was released from incarceration in 2009 and`eompleted his Community Control in 2010. 7 + +26. It not the intent of the United States government, nor was the NM designed, to hand the ag ljrpstein victims a jack pot or a key to the bank. + +otwithstanding the agreement reached by the United States Attorney's Office, the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the Plaintiff to resolve these matters, the Defendants during 2009 and 2010, embarked on a scheme to interfere with the NPA for the purpose of upping the stakes and inducing investors to fund the Ponzi scheme and to finance RRA. + +## ABUSE OF PROCESS + +28. The Plaintiff realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs I through 27 as if they were fully set forth here. + +29. In the Epstein Actions, the Defendants made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary ery" or threatening to take discovery, and by making unfounded allegations, includi AS not limited to: + +(1) Deposing three airplane pilots employe n, and seeking a deposition of a fourth pilot; collectively, the three were deposed for elve hours but were not asked a single question relating to any of the claims of ts. Instead they were asked many inflammatory questions that had no legitimate le ose; + +(2) Notifying the Plaintiff, intended to take the depositions and was subpoenaing: + +- (a) Donald T real-estate developer and television perso +- (b) A witz (renowned Harvard Law Professor and tein's criminal defense lawyers); inton (former President of the United States); 11 i (then Governor of New Mexico and former U.S. Representative and Ambassador to the United Nations); Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Records); David Copperfield (illusionist); and Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations. + +targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close to Epstein not because they had any connection to or knowledge of the claims of clients. intent was simply to harass friends and acquaintances of Epstein; + +(3) Asking outrageous questions of the Plaintiff in deposition which had no legitimate bearing on the case or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding the size of his genitalia; + +(4) In Jane Doe 2, represented in a pleading to the federal magistrate that records of communications by and between the United States Government and Epstein's criminal defense lawyers in the plea negotiations of the criminal matter were likely to lead to relevant information in the Jane Doe proceedings. Instead, the purpose of requesting those records was to obtain them for use in a separately filed Criminal V' • Rights Act ("CVRA") suit, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marral which was brought for several purposes, including invalidating the NPA Agreement. The claim to invalidate the NPA has no legitimate legal basis, given the fact that Epstein had pled guilty, se • ed a prison sentence, became a registered sex offender, and settled many civil actions. The does not confer on victims the right to impair prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney he U.S. Attorney, nor does it create any right to invalidate a prosecutor's decisig& le a federal criminal investigation or decline prosecution; + +(5) The representative of the trustee for ruptcy stated that there are thousands of documents involving RRA employees and go nt officials including state and federal law enforcement authorities relating to Epste + +(6) Conducting irrelevant an discovery to obtain records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Bard setts, when issues relating to Epstein's mental and emotional states were not d when Dr. Bard had never even treated the Plaintiff; + +(7) Filing a Seco ded Complaint on behalf of L.M., alleging that Epstein forced the minor into "o knew, or should have known, of a prior F.B.I. statement where L.M. tes r oath that she never engaged in such acts; + +(8) e p o conduct discovery of celebrities and other famous people that allegedly had fib on pstein's airplanes where alleged assaults took place, even though no RRA clients cl \*med they had flown on Epstein's airplanes; and + +(9) r irecting that third party subpoenas be used to obtain all records of and any other documents at two local pharmacies, when no issues of raised in the Epstein Actions. Epstein's prescri Epstein's heal + +30. Defendants used illegal and improper investigative tools, including trespassin Epstein's property and perpetrating continual and intrusive use of investigators for surveillance that interfered with Epstein's privacy, attempted to track or bring about a probation violation, and caused Epstein to employ security guards and install an expensive security system to prevent intrusions and protect himself. + +31. filed motions in Epstein Actions attempting to plead a cause of action for RICO when there was no good faith basis for doing so. + +32. filed motions to freeze assets of Epstein without any evidence that Epstein was attempting to sequester or transfer assets and prior to obtaining a judgment against Epstein. Atitc + +33. The Defendants had ulterior motives for making these inw.r uses of civil process which included, among others: + +- (1) obtaining monies to further a lavish li +- (2) obtaining operating revenue RRA could continue to operate; +- (3) obtaining funds for tied investigation and prosecution of the Epstein Action +- (4) maintaining a Po scheme. + +34. As a result of the ab9ve, laintiff has suffered damages, including but not sary attorney's fees and costs, the costs of installing an enhanced security systetty and th tention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property limited to incurring additional + +WHE13EFORm.the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against Defendant ottatithstein and Defendant J. for compensatory damages, costs, interest, andany other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and sent First Class mail this 12th day of April, 2011 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, + +Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola et al., +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()![]()W:\80743\COMPLA21-Amended Complaint-final-JLA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c50316f4ed98423ddfd0cc373e2cef88349bb666 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645/EFTA02769645.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,577 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769645.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 15754, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.89399999999998, + 39.69 + ], + [ + 463.72088623046875, + 39.69 + ], + [ + 463.72088623046875, + 69.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 146.89399999999998, + 69.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL DIVISION \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG \nJudge David F.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.419, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 417.96624755859375, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 417.96624755859375, + 125.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 192.419, + 125.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED COMPLAI", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.66, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 373.30499999999995, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 373.30499999999995, + 322.55853271484375 + ], + [ + 230.66, + 322.55853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "'4 , INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.2548522949219, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 371.21490478515625, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 371.21490478515625, + 431.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 256.2548522949219, + 431.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.82599999999996, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 381.347412109375, + 148.23 + ], + [ + 381.347412109375, + 163.17852783203125 + ], + [ + 224.82599999999996, + 163.17852783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "e Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 269.064, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 369.8003234863281, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 369.8003234863281, + 439.55853271484375 + ], + [ + 269.064, + 439.55853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.312, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 428.03668212890625, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 428.03668212890625, + 109.113037109375 + ], + [ + 213.312, + 109.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.19299999999998, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 365.5501708984375, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 365.5501708984375, + 108.86749267578125 + ], + [ + 242.19299999999998, + 108.86749267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769645" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a1eaf73e4e46710f7bd8e19b7796d3b5b007f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.md @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH +JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM +BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM** + +FILED +11 APR 15 PM 3:16 +SHARON K. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT COURT + +TO: All Counsel of Record + +**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the undersigned, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310(b)(4), will take the video deposition of: + +| NAME | DATE AND TIME | PLACE | +|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| AJ DiScala
303 Park Ave. #1401
New York, NY 10010 | Wednesday
May 25, 2011
10:30 a.m. | Dewey LeBoeuf
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019 | + +**\*The deponent has been instructed to bring with him all documents listed in Schedule A attached hereto.** + +upon oral examination before DIAMOND REPORTING AND LEGAL VIDEO, a Notary Public, or before some other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. + +Epstein v. Rothstein, M, etc. Case No 502009CA 040800)OOOCMBAG RE-NTD- Duces Tecum - AJ Discala — NY + +The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes, Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Court. + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, within a reaso proceeding contact the Administrative Office of the Court, 300 North West Palm Beach FL 33401, telephone (561)355-2431, 1- 1-800-955-8770, Via Florida Relay Service. of 'a special prior to any ay, Room 300, 771 (TDD), or + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEa ' + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and COff 8511 ASVeforegoing was mailed, faxed and emailed this 13 day of April, 2011 to : + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shi 4P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & eiss, P. 250 Australian Avenue So Suite 1400 West Palm Beach( 3340 -5012 + +Epstein v. Rothstein, a, etc. Case No. 502009CA 040800XXXXMBAG RE-NTD- Duces Tecum - AJ Discala — NY + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc s. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Cc: Diamond Reporting & Legal Vide + +W:1807431DiscoveryRE•NTD- DT Al Discal + +B + +. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 O Lilly A. M, Fla. Bar No. 195 ETT P.A. + +901 Philf West 777 So ag r Drive West h, Florida 33401 61) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 + +neys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +- I. Any and all documents including but not limited to correspondence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) st r.. Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) Mk. +- d) +- c) Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Bog. +- h) Deborah Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +` + +o + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreemen icluding all drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the folio ing attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) W I Ili +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Bo .cir +- h) Dcborah +- k) Richard (Ric ) andrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. + +- a) kaillothstein +- b) Adler + +- e) 0 +- g) +- h) +- i) +- k) Richard Fandrey +- I) Michael Fisten Kenneth Jenne David Boden Deborah OM Andrew Barnett Christina Kitterman + +- 4. Any and all documents given to you by any of the folbwing attorneys, yees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential inv ny claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) cr +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- I) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah MIN +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) tc ar is andrey +- I) Christina Kitterman\* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa96ea7505e9cbc22b2b45b09c1575c8cc96607a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655/EFTA02769655.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769655.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4827, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.325, + 77.14 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 77.14 + ], + [ + 538.409, + 119.36399999999999 + ], + [ + 288.325, + 119.36399999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.4, + 300.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.53, + 300.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 479.53, + 315.056 + ], + [ + 121.4, + 315.056 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEa '", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 393.1474914550781, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 393.1474914550781, + 324.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 218.51999999999998, + 324.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.469, + 141.93 + ], + [ + 361.0592346191406, + 141.93 + ], + [ + 361.0592346191406, + 155.0841064453125 + ], + [ + 283.469, + 155.0841064453125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 119 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769655" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0968707c0044687d5130bd0e0a5fe560313881dc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.md @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## REOUEST TO PRODUCE TO Ac. + +./. > C=1 r- = 330 • -n rn wa▪ **, r-rn tv -n** r- + +O + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Ed d through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Flo piS' R m f Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce aty pinit the following documents\*: to inspect and copy each of + +- 1. All documents\* ns tuting, reflecting, or relating to communications between Plaintiff or any a Plaintiff, on the one hand, and William Scherer, or any person associa Wil iam Scherer in the practice of law, any prosecuting, law enforcement, an ent entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMITIAG Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) sy ems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, ' of mputing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones. with data stora of transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested that the aforesaid production be made hirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Ba ipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. I ttio ill be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true-and\_correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counselonttte',tached list, t W ay of • mil, 2t II. + +> Jack Sc r No.: 169440 Se. enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: Attorneys for (561.9451 J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +Attorney For: Scott Rothstein +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] White Burnett, P.A. +Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e06f4a0a3da4393d8f5301094e964410b5deff62 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660/EFTA02769660.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769660.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3446, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.327, + 77.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 531.846435546875, + 77.8074951171875 + ], + [ + 531.846435546875, + 121.29998779296875 + ], + [ + 306.327, + 121.29998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REOUEST TO PRODUCE TO \nAc.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.17399999999998, + 297.5190734863281 + ], + [ + 434.95806884765625, + 297.5190734863281 + ], + [ + 434.95806884765625, + 347.44708251953125 + ], + [ + 174.17399999999998, + 347.44708251953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.389, + 157.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.957, + 157.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 348.957, + 172.848 + ], + [ + 256.389, + 172.848 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769660" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ee3c55397a51af0aecb9bc4f71722c634f3094e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +FILED +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +2011 APR 20 PM 3:18 + +MOTION TO DISMISS + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. [REDACTED], moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the Complaint against him for failure to state a cause of action and in support thereof would show: + +1. 1. the "Introduction" to the Amended Complaint is nothing more than conclusory surplusage apparently intended to defame Mr. [REDACTED] under the protection of the litigation privilege; +2. 2. the Amended Complaint fails to identify the "process" alleged to be abusive, on whom it is claimed to have been served, or when it is claimed to have been served; +3. 3. the Amended Complaint fails to articulate a cognizable theory of damages proximately caused by any wrongdoing on the part of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]; +4. 4. the Amended Complaint fails to identify any conduct outside the protection of the litigation privilege which could give rise to any liability on the part of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]; + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +[REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +5. all legal arguments and authorities as contained in the Defendant's previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment are incorporated by reference. + +WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] demands dismissal of the Amended Complaint against him. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of April, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Scarcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +Attorney For. 901 Philli 777 SF West ch, FL 33401.6170 Phone: (56 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 L. Ackemi Jr. uire a P.A. y est + +adv. Epstein Motion to Dismiss Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAC + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 4O4' West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 CO .' + += Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 'H% C) Lehrman, PL Attorney For. Jeffr Epstein 425 N. Andrews Ave venue, Suite 2 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik ( S' Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c00c0846e2641eb17123d31715279d153a7810a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663/EFTA02769663.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769663.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2854, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.327, + 92.848 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 92.848 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 135.127 + ], + [ + 306.327, + 135.127 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.33700000000002, + 368.076 + ], + [ + 366.009, + 368.076 + ], + [ + 366.009, + 382.16900000000004 + ], + [ + 239.33700000000002, + 382.16900000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 350.36181640625, + 132.84 + ], + [ + 350.36181640625, + 148.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 148.18353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769663" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abb23707d6100498300ba212a8ab9c67a5ebc77d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +20 gicQ. Dvixi ighway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DATE: May 19, 2011 TIME: 9:30 a.m. JUDGE: Honorable vid F. Palm Beach County Courthouse) PLACE: ROOM #: + +-n a + +ersigned has called up for hearing the YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t following: + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## N I TICE OF H + +## SPEC RS TO BE HEARD: + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Motion to Dismiss + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1-800-955-8771, or (V) 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 15th day of April, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eac28ae8738e66521e3c7c6cc910b378f693a513 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666/EFTA02769666.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769666.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2416, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.28, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.53499999999997, + 73.336 + ], + [ + 532.158447265625, + 73.336 + ], + [ + 532.158447265625, + 117.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 306.53499999999997, + 117.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "N I TICE OF H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.551, + 349.376 + ], + [ + 367.8419999999999, + 349.376 + ], + [ + 367.8419999999999, + 364.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 238.551, + 364.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC RS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.984, + 569.3839999999999 + ], + [ + 280.9809265136719, + 569.3839999999999 + ], + [ + 280.9809265136719, + 585.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 67.984, + 585.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 154.93800000000002 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 154.93800000000002 + ], + [ + 348.41799999999995, + 169.09900000000002 + ], + [ + 256.15399999999994, + 169.09900000000002 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769666" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..455940fac00429689d402a584e66eaf52849728e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH CCUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA04080CXXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +LC.I TOTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +-rt r rn 0 + +## NOTICE OF HEARINGS + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigred has set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. M, one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Coatroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on Thursday, May 19, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., the fo:lowing: + +## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE VIDEO DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +PLEASE GOVERN-YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 2C5 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355-4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this a ir'day of April, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409: and Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +1 + +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Notice of Hearing + +\ L. Acke , Jr. - j-91- Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 ?oint West 777 South Fagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 3340F Telephone: (561) 802-90 Facsimile: (561) 802-9 AS 9 + +WilI0NANOTHRG09-MPO Re JEE Video Depo•MSG.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26d1e7a47ddf66f5a2627a2f06e79baf9b207dbc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669/EFTA02769669.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769669.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1808, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH CCUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.046, + 49.653999999999996 + ], + [ + 461.4708557128906, + 49.653999999999996 + ], + [ + 461.4708557128906, + 78.60302734375 + ], + [ + 146.046, + 78.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.128, + 327.228 + ], + [ + 372.94561767578125, + 327.228 + ], + [ + 372.94561767578125, + 342.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 235.128, + 342.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE VIDEO \nDEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.598, + 463.1659999999999 + ], + [ + 518.80615234375, + 463.1659999999999 + ], + [ + 518.80615234375, + 491.863037109375 + ], + [ + 80.598, + 491.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769669" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..071451028836a023ef454c436c208df44566cf48 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +/ + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF Ida- UMC + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersig ri Ills e canceled the following hearing on Uniform Motion Calendar before the Honorable k <44( ' iF. one of the Judges of the abovestyled Court, in the Palm Beach County Co use, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Wednada ril 20, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., the following: + +r a + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEF C er FFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUD PPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKIN RA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA O71 PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES + +This hearing will be rescheduled to be heard at the Case Management hearing scheduled for Thursdayilly19, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. + +IllEREBY CERTIFY that a tme and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via email, facsimile and U.S. Mail this 19th day of April, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL + +33409, Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian +Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012. + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] E. Knight + +Fla. Bar. No. 607363 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W:\80743\NOTHRG11-Notice Cancellation of 4-20-2011 Hearing-JLA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea00c6b530b759bcb95597eda64a14201817e705 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671/EFTA02769671.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769671.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1854, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.652, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 462.97088623046875, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 462.97088623046875, + 72.35302734375 + ], + [ + 146.652, + 72.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF Ida- UMC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.37800000000001, + 309.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 447.86083984375, + 309.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 447.86083984375, + 324.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 159.37800000000001, + 324.05352783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769671" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8b93954b42424fc01f9edf246eba82d606ba061 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.md @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +TO: All counsel on the attached Co Ac sel c List + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION (Only change is via video-conference) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTI c4t)undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +### NAME AND ADDRESS + +Alfred Seckel ( s , + +upon 'nation before Esquire Deposition Services, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of California. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +DATE AND TIME + +May 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. PST (12:00 pm EST) + +### LOCATION + +Esquire Solutions Suite 500 1875 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067 + +-n r rn O + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Deposition +2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by E-Mail and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of April, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +cc: Esquire Solutions + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +**AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT** + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800)000CMBAG Notice of Taking Deposition 3 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com \_OA Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. O 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Phone: (561)-659-8300 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 C N Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, . Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fax: (954)-524-2822 40.1S Phone: (954)-524-2820 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +1S )4C) + +- + +L.L. Ackerman Jr., Esqui C .) Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beac 33401-6170 Phone: (561)- Fax: (561)- Attorneys y Epstein + +Marc S. marc®nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8df5f57ed0faa2f0d1e311b0f8170796aa63216e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673/EFTA02769673.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769673.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2789, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 72.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 531.3588256835938, + 72.67889404296875 + ], + [ + 531.3588256835938, + 115.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 115.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION \n(Only change is via video-conference)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 414.3152160644531, + 349.11 + ], + [ + 414.3152160644531, + 377.613037109375 + ], + [ + 192.10200000000003, + 377.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.93199999999999, + 479.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 207.74526977539062, + 479.2315673828125 + ], + [ + 207.74526977539062, + 493.113037109375 + ], + [ + 73.93199999999999, + 493.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 381.78000000000003, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 454.4468078613281, + 479.52 + ], + [ + 454.4468078613281, + 493.113037109375 + ], + [ + 381.78000000000003, + 493.113037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.10000000000001, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 381.25, + 441.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 381.25, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 67.10000000000001, + 457.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.10000000000002, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 417.8500000000001, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 417.8500000000001, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 189.10000000000002, + 498.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.78, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 349.9582824707031, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 349.9582824707031, + 157.113037109375 + ], + [ + 255.78, + 157.113037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769673" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba86a05987fce79d0648111cbcf8136ebacb279d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.md @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +#291874/mep + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +FILED +N APR 25 PM 3:22 +SHAKER, FORE CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +**PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND IMPOSE +SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR** + +Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. ██████, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves this Honorable Court for an order imposing sanctions against the Plaintiff for his failure to appear and compelling the attendance of Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, at deposition, and as grounds therefore would show: + +1. The deposition of Jeffrey Epstein was duly noticed at a time convenient for Plaintiff as well as Defendants. + +2. Jeffrey Epstein did not appear for the deposition and ██████ counsel was informed by counsel for Plaintiff that Jeffrey Epstein was notified of the deposition and simply chose not to appear. + +3. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff has been forced to move to compel the appearance of Plaintiff and to travel to Palm Beach County for a hearing of this Motion, and the deposition, and has incurred additional unnecessary time and expenses. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Compel and Impose Santions for Failure to Appear + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves for an order imposing sanctions against the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, compelling attendance of Jeffrey Epstein for deposition and for an order taxing attorney's fees necessitated by Plaintiffs cavalier attitude toward the litigation. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoin %n furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, t da. i 2011. + +Jack + +Flor 69440 + +Se Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2 al each Lakes Boulevard + +t Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +sax: (5S-9451 + +Attorney for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Motion to Compel and Impose Santions for Failure +to Appear + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 + +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. Plaintiff, No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; +██████ J. ██████, +individually, and L.M., +individually, + +Defendants. + +CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPEARANCE + +**DEPOSITION OF:** JEFFREY EPSTEIN +**DATE:** APRIL 13, 2011 +**TIME:** 9:30 a.m. +**PLACE:** SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, +BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida + +STATE OF FLORIDA ) +) ss. +COUNTY OF BROWARD ) + +I, CHRISTINE PHIPPS, RPR, FPR, CLR, do +hereby certify that I was present for the purpose +of reporting this deposition and that the +deponent did not appear. + +Under penalties of perjury, I reclare +that I have read the foregoing certificate and +that the facts stated in it are true. + +*Christine Phipps* + +![](_page_3_Picture_164.jpeg) + +Christine Phipps, RPR, FPR, CLR, +Phipps Reporting, Inc. +8517 Legend Club Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 + +| A
appear 1:41
APRIL 1:26
a.m 1:27 | Florida 1:6,31
1:34,51
foregoing 1:43
FPR 1:38,48 | SEARCY 1:28
SHIPLEY 1:29
ss 1:35
STATE 1:34
stated 1:44 | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| B
BARNHART
1:29
Beach 1:6,30,31
1:51
Boulevard 1:30
██████████ 1:15 | I
individually
1:14,16,17 | T
TIME 1:27
true 1:44 | +| C
certificate 1:23
1:43
certify 1:39
Christine 1:38
1:48
CIRCUIT 1:4,5
CLR 1:38,48
Club 1:50
COUNTY 1:6
1:36
COURT 1:4 | J 1:15
JEFFREY 1:9
1:25
JUDICIAL 1:5 | V
vs 1:12
W
West 1:31,51 | +| D
DATE 1:26
declare 1:42
Defendants 1:19
DENNEY 1:28
deponent 1:41
deposition 1:25
1:40
Drive 1:50 | L
Lakes 1:30
Legend 1:50
L.M 1:16
N
NON-APPEA...
1:23
P
Palm 1:6,30,31
1:51
penalties 1:42
perjury 1:42
Phipps 1:38,48
1:49
PLACE 1:28
Plaintiff 1:11
present 1:39
purpose 1:39
P.A 1:29 | 1
13 1:26
2
2011 1:26
2139 1:30
3
33412 1:51
5
502009CA040...
1:12
8
8517 1:50
9
9:30 1:27 | +| E
██████████
1:15
EPSTEIN 1:9
1:25 | R
read 1:43
reporting 1:40
1:49
ROTHSTEIN
1:14
RPR 1:38,48 | S
SCAROLA 1:28
SCOTT 1:14 | +| F
facts 1:44
FIFTEENTH
1:5 | | | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20ae933e9dd1b4942c032ffb5263b3b8d29c8ac9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/EFTA02769676.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 9387, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.46, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_164.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 531.462, + 86.67 + ], + [ + 531.462, + 129.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 306.03000000000003, + 129.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.37800000000001, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 446.62199999999996, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 446.62199999999996, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 159.37800000000001, + 375.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 349.662, + 151.47 + ], + [ + 349.662, + 165.24 + ], + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 165.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.382, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 467.103, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 467.103, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 242.382, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.887, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 399.5040000000001, + 339.39 + ], + [ + 399.5040000000001, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 208.887, + 351.53999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 164 + ], + [ + "Line", + 75 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769676" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/_page_3_Picture_164.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/_page_3_Picture_164.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06447db1dab0a116479462e9e143412b42172cca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769676/_page_3_Picture_164.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f82972a3356014dbc58702f4884e9d280766c55fdd1f53ac60ea0ce52ff0e59d +size 9127 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aaf111965b7f0a0445065b516075c004955cde2c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David 7. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and J individually, + +Defendants. + +## JOINT STATEMENT OF PENDING MOTION + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Plaintiff' or "Epstein" dant, Edwards, ") file this Joint Statement pursuant to t Management Order entered April 12, 2011, of all pending motions to be h y 19, 2011: + +-n tT C + +## PLAINTIFF. JEEF PSTEIN'S MOTIONS + +- Epstein's Motion t otion tc Determine if Privileged Claims are Waived (D.E. 232); +- 2. Epstein's Epstein (D.E. 2817S t on for Protective Order Regarding the Video Deposition of Jeffrey +- 3. in Motion for Protective Order Relating to the Deposition of Alfred Seckel, served , Epstein's Amended and Supplemental Motion to Overrule Objections and Compel to Answer Questions and Appear for Further Deposition (D.E. 230); +- 5. Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Relating to Extra Judicial Statements (D.E. 271); + +- 2011; +- 6. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, served April 17, +- 7. Motion for Protective Orde: and Objections to Canceled Notice of Taking Deposition and Appointment of Special (D.E. 249); + - 8. Motion to Assert Punitive Damage Claims, argued with ruling pending; +- 9. Motion for Reconsideration of Order Sustai 'fitkintiffs Objections to Discovery dated December 22, 2010, (D.E. 168), argued with ry1igg pe ing; +- 10. Motion to Compel and Impo Deposition. for Failure to Appear for + +# DEFENDANT J. MOTIONS + +## NON-PARSY ACI \LOTIONS + +- 11. Spencer Kuvin's Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Subpoena for Joint Privilege Documents (D.E. 267); -447 +- 12. Non-Party PodhUjst ()rseck, P.A.'s Motion for Protective Order and Stay Order, served March 31, + +### JOINDER + +The tuidersigned consulted with Jack Scarola, counsel for MI, who authorized the undersigned to represent he agrees and joins in this Statement. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile and mailed this )-0 day of April, 2011 to Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, + +Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denney Scarola et al., +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3625, West Palm Beach, FL 33409. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()[REDACTED] WHITE BURNETT, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2274435c72da1f039d2d1e73efe01e6e9e408dd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681/EFTA02769681.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769681.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2709, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.03199999999998, + 42.9 + ], + [ + 466.7208557128906, + 42.9 + ], + [ + 466.7208557128906, + 71.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 151.03199999999998, + 71.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT STATEMENT OF PENDING MOTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.60999999999999, + 295.35 + ], + [ + 432.39, + 295.35 + ], + [ + 432.39, + 311.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 176.60999999999999, + 311.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF. JEEF PSTEIN'S MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 179.65499999999997, + 404.25 + ], + [ + 434.8894958496094, + 404.25 + ], + [ + 434.8894958496094, + 419.60302734375 + ], + [ + 179.65499999999997, + 419.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT J. MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 161.38500000000002, + 106.683 + ], + [ + 446.5653991699219, + 106.683 + ], + [ + 446.5653991699219, + 122.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 161.38500000000002, + 122.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NON-PARSY ACI \\LOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 382.901 + ], + [ + 388.629150390625, + 382.901 + ], + [ + 388.629150390625, + 398.363037109375 + ], + [ + 250.29899999999998, + 398.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.61400000000003, + 521.837 + ], + [ + 330.4124450683594, + 521.837 + ], + [ + 330.4124450683594, + 536.363037109375 + ], + [ + 271.61400000000003, + 536.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769681" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1593d2a62102eae67b2e16832113701a6f0e0f6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X3OOCMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +r." it + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +C.) + +## NOTICE OF HEARING - Sp cdtment + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the and t set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. M, one of the Jud o above-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixi wa , Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on hursda Ma 1 , the following: + +## PLAINTIFF'S OT ON TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PREVENT DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL AND PROTECTIVE + +## PLAINTIFF/CC TE DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A P 6 CTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL ST E TS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 3554796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +I HEREJOY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this rday of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +WM.0743 I•NOH on MPO sad MaQuash ILA doalSaf + +seph . Ackerman, Jr. (1 ar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm 3each, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d56393443a3c6f3ee5ea2450a7984426631c97d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684/EFTA02769684.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769684.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2001, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.536, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 466.8299865722656, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 466.8299865722656, + 76.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 150.536, + 76.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING - Sp cdtment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.24399999999997, + 325.211 + ], + [ + 429.7559999999999, + 325.211 + ], + [ + 429.7559999999999, + 341.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 177.24399999999997, + 341.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S OT ON TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR \nPREVENT DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL \nAND \nPROTECTIVE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 461.45899999999995 + ], + [ + 511.9137878417969, + 461.45899999999995 + ], + [ + 511.9137878417969, + 505.8624572753906 + ], + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 505.8624572753906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/CC TE DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION \nFOR A P 6 CTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND \nDEFE OUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL \nST E TS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH \nINCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.268, + 503.63100000000003 + ], + [ + 530.9825439453125, + 503.63100000000003 + ], + [ + 530.9825439453125, + 575.2324981689453 + ], + [ + 75.268, + 575.2324981689453 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769684" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaa15dcb40e0411a9c64e07aac7fdc96d67c7056 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.md @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER +TO PREVENT DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL** + +Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 1.280 and Rule 1.410, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, for entry of a protective order and an order quashing a subpoena commanding non-party Alfred Seckel to appear for deposition in Los Angeles, California on May 23, 2011, which subpoena Defendant [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") has noticed over the Plaintiff's objection. The grounds for this Motion are: + +1. On or about April 7, 2011, counsel to [REDACTED] noticed the deposition of Mr. Seckel, despite the fact that counsel to [REDACTED] was advised by Plaintiff's counsel that Mr. Seckel has no knowledge of any issue in this case and is barely known to the Plaintiff at all. A copy of the Notice and Subpoena is attached as **Exhibit A**. + +2. The Plaintiff seeks an order quashing the subpoena and entry of a protective order to prevent the taking of this deposition indefinitely because Mr. Seckel has no relevant information about this case and to allow the deposition would effectively condone harassment. + +case. 4. Accordingly, Mr. Seckel has no information'relevant to any issue in this case nor does he possess any information likely to lead to t discovery of admissible evidence in this + +3. The Plaintiff became acquainted with Mr. Seckel approximately eighteen (18) months ago in the fall of 2009. At that time, the Plaintiff had already pled guilty, completed his prison sentence and was on community control. The Plaintiff and Mr. Seckel share a common interest in cognitive neuroscience and the science of perception. Mr. Seckel is believed to be one of the world's leading experts in the field of visual and other types of sensor sions, has authored many books and articles related to the science of visual percept' e Plaintiff has met with Mr. Seckel on approximately three (3) occasions and othertvi i tmunicated with him on less than ten (10) occasions regarding to this shared scientific interest. + +5. The taking of Mr. Seckel' (CIP\ epo "on, without first making a showing that Mr. Seckel does, in fact, have nformation material to this case or that is likely to lead to admissible evidence, would aJl defendant to use the rules of discovery as a litigation tactic rather than to obtain admissible evidence. + +6. Moriover, the taking of this deposition would amount to the harassment of a disinterested non-party for the seemingly sole purpose of harassing and embarrassing the Plaintiff. \_- + +7. A deposition without some explanation of what the witness allegedly knows — not based on rumor or a secret source -- will simply waste the time and resources of all concerned. + +# Legal Argument + +8. Discovery in Florida civil cases is permitted only as to matters which are relevant or which are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the case in + +which the discovery is sought. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(6)(1); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995). + +9. "Pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the element of surprise, to encourage the settlement of cases, to avoid costly litigation, and to achieve a balanced search for the truth to ensure a fair trial." Elkins v. Syken, (Fla. 1996) (citing Dodson v. Pet-sell, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1980); Surf D , 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970)). o. 2d 517 v. Vermette, + +10. In Elkins, the Florida Supreme Court commented o li?e purpose discovery: of pretrial + +Discovery was never intended to be used as in a manner that actually chills the ava witnesses; nor was it intended to make could effectively deny access to in\$ resolve their disputes unjustly. tactical, tool to harass an adversary lity of information by non-party very process so expensive that it and witnesses or force parties to + +Id. at 522. + +11. The Court con • ued • explanation of why discovery must be used only for proper purposes: + +To allow d overy hat is overly burdensome and that harasses, embarrasses, and annoys on 's versary would lead to a lack of public confidence in the credibility of th ci court process. The right to a jury trial in the constitution means nothing if the public has no faith in the process and if the cost and expense are so great that access is basically denied to all but the few who can afford it. + +Id. + +12. Likewise, in Allstate, the Court had reasoned: + +Discovery of certain kinds of information 'may reasonably cause material injury of an irreparable nature.' This includes 'cat out of the bag' material that could be used to injure another person or party outside the context of the litigation.... + +Id. at 94 (citations omitted). That Court, in quashing the district court's decision to permit discovery even after it had been established that such discovery was neither relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of relevant information, concluded that carte blanche discovery of irrelevant information ought not be sanctioned: + +[a]though we cannot say that irrelevant materials sought in a discovery reqUest necessarily cause irreparable harm, we do not believe that a litigant is entitled carte blanche to irrelevant discovery. + +Id. at 95. + +il + +13. Rule 1.280(c) affords the Court discretion to grant protective orders for good cause shown and to protect a party from annoyance, embarrassment, 'oppression, or undue burden / I or expense. Subsection (c) affords the court broad discretion/to limit or prohibit discovery in / order "to protect a party or person from annoy Nmparrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense that justice requires." Id.; se so itech Cargo v. J W. 817 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). + +14. Among other thia thi Court may enter an order that the requested discovery not be had at all. Rule 1.280(c)(1), Fla. R. Civ. P.; compare Medero v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 658 So. 2d 566,X8 (Flav 3d DCA 1995)(reversing trial court order denying deposition of material witn + +e Rule has been successfully invoked to prevent invasion of privacy of nonparties as well as to prevent the dissemination of defamatory content. v. State, 827 So. 2d 1026, 1030-31 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(petition for certiorari granted to protect privacy interests); see also Pescod v. Wells Rd. Veterinary Med. Cir., Inc., 748 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (discovery protective order reasonable within the spectrum of Rule 1.280(c)). + +16. In this case, the mere taking of the deposition constitutes waste and harassment. It is anticipated, given the general notice of taking deposition, that counsel to defendant will ask any and all manner of questions whether they are relevant to this litigation or not. The witness has no direct knowledge and will likely be intimidated or even feel obliged to search for answers he cannot know if required to give testimony at this time. ASatc + +17. This type of discovery amounts to a litigation tactic which cit no relevant information and would, if permitted, merely serve to permit a strearrof ing questions about events which have not been shown to have occurred and which could be of no relevance to this case even if they had occurred. Significantly, to be relevant an examination of Mr. Seckel cannot be based on events that occurred well before Eckel became acquainted with the Plaintiff. + +WHEREFORE, for the above sta a protective order to preventing the s, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein moves for entry of the deposition of Alfred Seckel and for such other relief as the Court deems prope in the dTrcumstances. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY\_ that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this,kday of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. I Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West PaInt,Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()W:\80743\MTNPRO61-re A Seckel-SA.docx + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOO34BAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +#### RE-NOTICE OF TAKING NlItO MON (Only change is via video-conference) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +#### NAME AND ADDR.Fi\_SS TE AND TIME + +Alfred Seckel 7 ,440" May 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. PST (12:00 pm EST) + +#### LOCATION + +Esquire Solutions Suite 500 1875 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067 + +upon oralexattlination before Esquire Deposition Services, a Notary Public; or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of California. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +![](_page_6_Picture_17.jpeg) + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXXMBAG +Notice of Taking Deposition +2 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +E-Mail and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 22nd day of April, +2011. + +![]()cc: Esquire Solutions + +E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED + +AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Manager, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. Please telephone (561) 686-6300. + +adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Taking Deposition 3 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esqu. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive / West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attome fkeffrey Epstein AI + +Marc . Nun marc@mrrilclaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4140199a559d5a5d09598598f3a35bd0f36c8c7d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/EFTA02769686.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,590 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 11001, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.06, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Picture_17.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.652, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 460.56000000000006, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 460.56000000000006, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 146.652, + 71.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PREVENT DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.66, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 530.25, + 338.58 + ], + [ + 66.66, + 338.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Legal Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.52, + 647.19 + ], + [ + 344.8125, + 647.19 + ], + [ + 344.8125, + 662.9780120849609 + ], + [ + 254.52, + 662.9780120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.212, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 516.9918212890625, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 516.9918212890625, + 131.478515625 + ], + [ + 304.212, + 131.478515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING NlItO MON \n(Only change is via video-conference)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 407.6891784667969, + 351.53999999999996 + ], + [ + 407.6891784667969, + 378.9785461425781 + ], + [ + 196.95000000000002, + 378.9785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDR.Fi_SS TE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.84, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 327.9531555175781, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 327.9531555175781, + 488.4785461425781 + ], + [ + 84.84, + 488.4785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 231.49200000000002, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 326.028, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 326.028, + 487.62 + ], + [ + 231.49200000000002, + 487.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 375.71999999999997, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.91552734375, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 444.91552734375, + 487.7285461425781 + ], + [ + 375.71999999999997, + 487.7285461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.386, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 373.296, + 443.88 + ], + [ + 373.296, + 457.65 + ], + [ + 79.386, + 457.65 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.31400000000002, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 407.83799999999997, + 482.76 + ], + [ + 407.83799999999997, + 495.72 + ], + [ + 193.31400000000002, + 495.72 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.762, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 347.52130126953125, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 347.52130126953125, + 171.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 258.762, + 171.9735107421875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769686" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/_page_6_Picture_17.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/_page_6_Picture_17.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e951cb5f95998228fd15e067af9ab028c7f4b5d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769686/_page_6_Picture_17.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:28f89dd1d3910d78e397a10f3e7f22fa7d836d61f386e8e816d56d19c37eb79f +size 8430 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c34ae055cb7565df447577b9ab7d0369908e496 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.md @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 + +Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +n - • O + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORY + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (Tpstein"), by and through his undersigned N`f counsel, and pursuant to the Florida Rules of 'Civil Procedure, files this Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendant, Counter/P in adley J. Additional Interrogatory. The grounds for this motion are as f tc Iltws. + +- 1. On April kitiva\_ 2011, fendant, Counter/Plaintiff, J. SI ) served by facsimile his Notice of Propounding Interrogatory a/k/a Additional Interrogatory to . Epstein. A co c ephisdiscovery e request is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 'deadline for Epstein to respond to this discovery request is May 2, 2011. Initially, Mr. submitted interrogatories in excess of the permissive number. The parties agreed to allow an excess number of interrogatories and the court entered an agreed order expanding the number of interrogatories on October 5, 2010. +- 4. The number of interrogatories for which seeks a response is approximately 68 interrogatories. + +5. has pending with this discovery his Motion to Permit Additional Interrogatory which motion has not be set before this court for hearing. + +6. Epstein requests an extension of fourteen (14) days within which to serve his response to Additional Interrogatory faxed April 1, 2011. + +8. Undersigned counsel certifies that this request is made in good fait not for the purpose of delay. The undersigned counsel further certifies that he has and ntinue to make O an effort to resolve this matter without the need of a hearing. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Ep Can• , ) respectfully requests that this Court grant an extension of fourteen (14) days; i.5.-up to yait including May 16, 2011 in . 7 which to serve a response to 'Mt Additional Interrogatory,/ + +# ( CERTI,ZCATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY th S tnyid im correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via feEmail, O Fa simil , .S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this qday of May, 2011 t iaibr + +\C r Jack Scarola, Esq.( Searcy Denney Scuola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach-, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +![]()Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff/ +Counter-Defendant + +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +#### NOTICE OF PROPOUNDSC RROGATORY TO PLAIN'TIFF FRAY EPSTEIN + +Defendant, ovides notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 4 o ) Interrogatory has been directed to Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, this lAeday of 2011. + +It is requested that the a oresaid answers be served within thirty (30) days at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409. + +![](_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg) + +![](_page_3_Picture_12.jpeg) + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by A"f 7r lop U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this P e day of Li 20 1. + +OLA + +ar No.: 169440 ' + +Denney Scarola Barnhart .& ipley, P.A. + +2 9 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney fo tiff(s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXX3CMBAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Attcrbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +ME Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman Jr., Es Burnett, A. 1 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beachkft 3 401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)002-9976 Attorn4Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik marc@nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Cos + +## INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +(If answering for another person or entity, answer with respect to that person or entity, unless otherwise stated.) + +- l. As to every act characterized by the Plaintiff as an alleged "abuse of process" by state the following: + - a. An exact and detailed description of the "process" includinvhe title of all pleadings or other documents which Plaintiff contends w • + - b. The date on which each alleged abuse occurred. + - c. The nature of the damage suffered (he shtniff as a consequence of this abuse; + - d. The amount of the damage alleged to have been caused by the abuse. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG + +STATE OF + +COUNTY OF + +The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before in this day of , 20\_\_, by , who is personally known to me or who has produced not take an oath. as identification and who did/did + +(SEAL) + +(Notary signature) + +(Notary name - prifi) + +NOTARY AEI , State of Florida + +any) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80208360b3547411f5e3119679b076595d5c997e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/EFTA02769695.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,477 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 5719, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.08, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg", + "_page_3_Picture_12.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR \nPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.332, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 532.1043090820312, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 532.1043090820312, + 129.72802734375 + ], + [ + 316.332, + 129.72802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO \nENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.114, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 530.6543579101562, + 321.57000000000005 + ], + [ + 530.6543579101562, + 350.988037109375 + ], + [ + 72.114, + 350.988037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "( CERTI,ZCATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.766, + 390.3565673828125 + ], + [ + 382.8680725097656, + 390.3565673828125 + ], + [ + 382.8680725097656, + 411.738037109375 + ], + [ + 218.766, + 411.738037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.484, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 526.371826171875, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 526.371826171875, + 162.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 311.484, + 162.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUNDSC RROGATORY \nTO PLAIN'TIFF FRAY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.134, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 440.19091796875, + 358.83 + ], + [ + 440.19091796875, + 386.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 175.134, + 386.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.822, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 354.27130126953125, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 354.27130126953125, + 187.728515625 + ], + [ + 264.822, + 187.728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.56, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 462.2216796875, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 462.2216796875, + 109.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 157.56, + 109.8580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769695" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..684e6a1dda8d8c45c08ea6bdddf7d56c479b9b1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:96c6bd91923561808530643d06b8b5c91f560d38137ea3c59d6b807302832667 +size 8240 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_12.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c6d150b8ab1373bcd928a22af10b5d69c9ba956 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769695/_page_3_Picture_12.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d6a7597fd87706aad139cca6dcd1c4c7df782d1b1ede85204ce66190209ca738 +size 14921 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f18803de8a64d82435a2b131fd6118bb833749f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.md @@ -0,0 +1,1041 @@ +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +• PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY E AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUD NG COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FR G EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTAR MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED4k4L AUTHORITIES + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFF EP TEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to 80(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Amended Motion for Pr Live Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From IOQaking Extrajudicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press as set fortkbelow, and states: + +1. reran icle posted on www.palmbeachdailvnews.com on October 15, 2010, entitled "Cl Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jac Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. was quoted as stating: 1) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cloud over Mr. head." (Exhibit 1). + +2. In an article appearing on www.rialmbeachdailvnews.com, posted February 28, 2011, and updated March 1, 2011, entitled "Jeffrey Epstein Introduced Woman to Prince Andrew, She Tells London 'Daily Mail'," Mr. is quoted as saying: "I feel terrible for Virginia and all of the other girls that were sexually abused, but I was not surprised at all by the story." also said. "I represented several girls that, similar to Virginia, we ery young and vulnerable and were badly abused by Epstein. These girls will never co I eal from what they went through. What is most troublesome though is that t s crimes went virtually unpunished. I currently represent several victims that wan n prosecuted for the crimes he committed against them, which is why we filed under the Crime Victim's Rights Act in an effort to overturn the illegal plea d a gylt true justice for these victims." (Exhibit 2). + +frAck 3. On March 8, 2011, the BARD Marketing firm issued a press release on behalf of Mr. current law firm, Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., which stated that Mr. "successfully represented" ten women between 12 and 15 years \,' old "by proving that Epstein and his international sex trafficking criminal enterprise exploited them and hundreds of other underage girls." (Exhibit 3) (emphasis added). The press release quotes Mr. Edwards as stating inter alia that "we took on powerful people and sought to level the playing fie tigkprriltect victims" and that the media attention will hopefully "inspire victims to report thes rimes." (Id). + +4. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted Paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is Facing a New Criminal Investigation and is Involved in a Civil Suit with a Lawyer." (Exhibit 4). The source for much of that article's information is Mr. Scarola, who is quoted to have said the following (Id): + +- a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." +- b. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United States for sex." +- c. "We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr. Epstein while Mr., \_ Epstein has been in the company of under-agedt , children." + +5. On March 11, 2011 the Palm Beach Daily News p s an article entitled "Jeffrey Epstein Address Book `Holy Grail' of Famous N 'bit 5). This article refers to the fact that "[t]he British press has been having digging up new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." (Id.), + +6. Two days later, another Britisl'blication, "The Observer," reported: ' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week am intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he tay o ay not have seen while attending parties with Epstein." (Exhibit 6). + +7. An gtticle published in the "Independent" on March 13, 2011 reported that Mr. Scarola said: t ) o C ar e the process of scheduling a further deposition of Mr. Epstein at which we intend to him regarding the details of his child abuse, including all circumstances in /-- which he \ may have been involved in procuring sexual favours from minors for his high-profile friends." (Exhibit 7). + +8. Again, on March 17, 2011, the BARD Marketing firm, on behalf of = Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., issued a press release entitled "Victims of Sexual Abuse Demand Justice." (Exhibit 8). The press release states that `'M proved that Epstein a "billionaire pedophile" and that " 10. Moreover, the =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Facebook Fan page, http://www.facebook.com/fP/F tirJa Weissing, refers to Mr. Epstein as Nkt /ti/e/ipact (kw° men seek justice, who were sexually molested and abused by Epstein." (Exhibit 10). N + +and his international sex trafficking criminal enterprise exploited them and hundreds of other underage girls." (Id.) (emphasis added). + +9. The =, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. website, www.pathtojustice.com also issues press releases and links online articles relating to Mr. Epstein and the lawsuits. These press releases are titled: 1) "Brad Files'', Motion in A r\_r Jeffrey Epstein Case — Violation of Crime Victim's Rights Act," (March, 2) "London Papers Quote in Recent Jeffrey Epstein / Prince Andrew Sc d h, 2011); and 3) 4. Prevails on Key Rulings in Epstein Case" (May, 2010). it 9). + +11. At a hearing before this/Couit on March 31, 2011, Mr. Scarola repeatedly labeled Mr. Epstein a "pedophile." (Exhibit 11). + +12. Mr. l=t and his attorneys should not be permitted to wage a media campaign against Mr. Epst taint e jury pool, and pre-try their case in the court of world opinion. Accordingly, tements and comments by Mr. Scarola and Mr. to the press and media r g Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of underage women -- other than what appears in the public record -- should be barred by the Court. + +13. Undeniably, this Court has the discretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n Co. v. MI, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by a court on communications between lawyers and/or litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910; Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988) (there is no constitutional impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that ate intended for publication). + +14. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910,I recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: + +> Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants and officials directly affected by court proceedings may be made at the court's discretion.... Muzzling lawyers who may wish to make public statements ... has long been recognized as within \Ike court's inherent power to control professional conduct. + +The Florida Supreme Court later stated: ohiAion on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." McCrary, 520 So 6 (order prohibiting public comment on evidence and charges against two defend is b embers of state attorney's office and sheriff's office was proper preventive meas prejudicial publicity threatened to impair the right to a fair trial). + +15. Co unications by Mr. Scarola and Mr. M, as attorneys and officers of the co the media and press are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar Rule 4-3.6, entitled "Trial Publicity": + +> (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding due to its + +creation of an imminent and substantial detrimental effect on that proceeding. + +(b) Statements of Third Parties. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to make such a statement. Counsel shall exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, employees, or other persons assisting in or associated with a case from making extrajudicial statements that are prohibited under this rule." + +permissible balance between the First Amendment rights of attorney r) n pending cases and the state's interest in fair trials." Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501.U.S. 1030, 1075, Ill S. Ct. 2720, 2745, 115 L. Ed. 2d 888 (1991). / / 16. Florida Bar Rule 4-3.6 incorporates the "substantial liCs 111; ' d of material prejudice" standard that the United States Supreme Court foun "constitutionally + +17. The foregoing authorities make j perfectly clear that in appropriate cases 7\ s \'' extrajudicial statements can and shouldfiprotu jted. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. ,--- V--,' , 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999 (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to, impose limitations on communications between counsel and the 1 media). This is an excee4ingly appropriate case for prohibiting extrajudicial statements because the ongoing media No person covered by this order shall make any statement to members of any television, radio, newspaper, magazine, intemet (including, but not limited to, bloggers), or other media organization about this case, other than matters of public record, that could interfere with a fair trial or otherwise prejudice the parties or the administration of justice; + +- 2. Nothing set forth in paragraph I shall prohibit the parties in this action or their counsel + +- (a) Stating, without elaboration or any kind of characterization whatsoever: the general nature of an allegation or defense made in this case; + - (ii) information contained in the public record of this case; + - (iii) scheduling information; + - (iv) any decision made or order issued by the court which is a matter of public record. +- (b) Explaining, without any elaboratio-n or any kind of characterization whatsoevey,, 14 ;contents or substance of any motion or step proceedings, to the extent such motim'oKtep is a matter of public record in this' c/ase\ind any ruling made thereon to the extent that such ruling is a matter of public record. , ' + +The Plaintiff requests to grant...duller protection so that such matters do not become - N public record for prejudicial extrajudicial "statements. The Plaintiff further requests that the court require the Defendant and his counsel to establish good cause in the advance of any filing with such references and advance of any statements for the media. + +24. In anion, Mr. Scarola should be prohibited from labeling Mr. Epstein in open court as a Veep e," as he has done. (See Exhibit 10). By using the epithet in open court, it becomes'part7cof the public record and fodder for the media. Pursuant to Fla. R. Evid. 404, Mr. Scarola could not use such an epithet during the trial or introduce evidence to support the disparaging characterizations. + +25. The extrajudicial statements by Mr. Scarola and Mr. throw roadblocks in the "path to justice" and should not be permitted. + +**WHEREFORE**, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests that the Court grant his Amended Motion for a Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff from Making Extrajudicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and grant such other and further relief as is deemed necessary and proper. + +Respectfully submitted, + +By: + +![]()[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Esq. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +and + +[REDACTED] E. Knight +Fla. Bar. No. 607363 + +[REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickell Avenue +Miami, Florida 33131 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 +*Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein* + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail + +and U.S. Mail this 24 day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 +[REDACTED] E. Knight, Esq. +Fla. Bar No. 607363 + +![](_page_11_Picture_1.jpeg) + +Claim: Epstein filed lawsuit to 'intimidate' attorney prosecuting sex abuse cases + +By MICHELE DARGAN + +DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER + +Updated: 8:21 p.m. Friday, Oct. 15, 2010 + +Posted 8:04 p.m. Friday, Oct. 15, 2010 + +Billioni ffender Jeffrey Epstein filed his 2009 lawsuit against attorney Brad Edwards in an effort to get to drop sex abuse lawsuits filed against Epstein, attorney Jack Scarola said Friday. + +"The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. lar is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against r. Epstein," Scarola said. + +secured deals for victims L.M., E.W. and Jane Do re among nearly two dozen young women who received confidential settlements from Epstein. filed a new lawsuit last month against Epstein on behalf of victim M.J., asking for \$50 million in amages. + +At a court hearing Friday. Scarola told Circuit Judge David that all lawsuits were settled for 'very substantial sums of money, which is directly contrary to the assertions that Mr. Epstein made that these cases were fabrications? + +The hearing was related to Epstein's lawsuit against , alleging . was involved in false claims made by Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein. Epstein says Rothstein ure investors to me by telling them Epstein had agreed to settle sex abuse lawsuits for as much as \$200 million. worked at Rothstein's firm for less than a year Rothstein is named as a defendant. + +Speaking on behalf of Epstein, attorney IN Ackerman said, "Except in certain cases, we believe the Rothstein firm was marketing cases that di n t exist, not necessarily the ones he settled. We believe actions were taken in those cases that were an abuse of process to inflate the marketing: + +filed a counterclaim, alleging Epstein filed a frivolous lawsuit to get him to back down from representing the victims. + +Epstein had filed a complaint with the Florida Bar against raising allegations that 1.1 and others were involved i aii in's wrongdoing. After investigating the claim, the Florida Bardismissed the complaint. In July, receivegswaLfrom the U.S. Attorney's Office — the office responsible for prosecuting Rothstein — identifying as a potential victim of Rothstein. + +Scarola wants the judge to sever the cases and fast-track case. + +"This constitutes a very substantial cloud over Mr. head," Scarola said. + +"Public allegations have been made against him that he was a participant in this major fraud, one of the largest in the history of South Florida, and we want, expeditiously, to have that cloud removed.' + +Epstein. 57, finished serving his one-year probation in July on state charges of soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor for prostitution. More than two dozen underage girls were identified in federal documents as having been sexually abused by Epstein. + +A secret deal with federal prosecutors revealed Epstein could have been charged with multiple federal counts of sexual exploitation of minors, resulting in much harsher penalties. But the feds deferred to two state charges that got him an 18-month sentence. He served only 13 months in a vacant wing at the Palm Beach County Stockade. • • Dr + +![](_page_11_Picture_21.jpeg) + +In more than 62 pages of court documents, Scarola asserts the court should rule in IE. favor for at least two reasons: that Epstein has elected to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege in eposrtions, and Epstein's claims are unsupported and contradicted by the evidence. + +"Under the well-established 'sword and shield' doctrine, Epstein cannot seek damages from while at the same time asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to block relevant discovery; Scarola wrote in court papers. + +"Epstein's deposition was taken at least five times," court papers say. "During all of these depositions, Epstein refused to answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse of minor girls." + +Ackerman said the Rothstein lawsuit is a different situation than Epst the Fifth in depositions regarding the victims, because the allegations against Rothstein and look place outside of Epstein's personal knowledge. + +"This is not a case where Mr. Epstein has personal knowledge of what happened at the Rothstein firm in regard to these claims," Ackerman said. "These investors went to the Rothstein firm and were shown case files for the L.M. litigation against our client for the purpose of putting investments in. The complaint is not based on whether our client is guilty or not guilty for the crimes for which he settled or pled guilty to. What he has said in the complaint is they took the cases against me ... t6liaspipt to inflate the value for the purpose of the investment? + +Scarola that Epstein has refused to answer any questions regarding his basis for claims against + +"We have undertaken n demonstrate absence been made against Mr. but to affirmatively innocence with respect o ese matters," Scarola s n evidence to support any claims that have elusively demonstrate his complete and total + +Find this article at: + +htlp /Now/ palmbeachdailynews.cominews/ filed-lawsuit-to-intimidate-attornee974565.html + +ftj Prini this page 9 Close + +![](_page_13_Picture_2.jpeg) + +### Jeffrey Epstein introduced woman to Prince Andrew, she tells London 'Daily Mail' + +By MICHELE DARGAN + +DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER + +Updated: 9:04 a.m. Tuesday, March 1. 2011 + +Posted: 7:12 p.m. Monday, February 28, 2011 + +The young woman previously known as Jane Doe 102 has gone public, detailing her life fronh4c 15 as a paid sex slave for Jeffrey Epstein and his friends. + +Now a married 27-year-old mother of three living in Australia, London's Daily Mail in an interview published Sunday. th to + +spoke to the Mail after a photo recently surfaced of Epstein and Britain's Prince Andrew walking in Central Park. The photo was taken when the prince visited Epstein's Manhattan apartment in December. + +reveals to the Mail that she was in Prince Andrew's company three times at th of Epstein. An old photo, printed in the Mail, shows a smiling Andrew with his arm around.. waist. The photo was taken at the London home of Epstein pal Ghislaine Maxwell. + +\*There is no suggestion that there was any sexual contact between Virginia and Andrew or that Andrew knew that Epstein paid her to have sex with his friends; the Mail said. + +On that trip, which also included stops in Paris, Spain, Granada and Tangier, said Epstein paid her \$15,000. + +Epstein, 58, received an 18-month sentence on state charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. He is now a lifelong registered sex offender. + +A deal with federal prosecutors revealed Epstein could have been charged with multiple federal counts of sexual exploitation of minors, resulting in much harsher penalties. But the feds deferred to the two state charges. + +Serving 13 months segregated in a vacant wing of the county stockade, Epstein was let out on work release six days a week for up to 16 hours a day. In addition, probation records reveal that while serving one year of house arrest, Epstein was given permission to travel out of state and spend hours outside his house, all with the blessing of either the court or his probation officer. Epstein retained some of the best lawyers in the country to get what many have described as a sweetheart deal. + +In December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Epstein as Jane Doe 102. She was one of nearly two dozen women who settled lawsuits against Epstein for undisclosed am l alleging they were sexually abused by him as minors. The lawsuit says Maxwell recruited t The Mar-A-Lago Club, where was working as a changing room assistant. Maxwell tol she could earn big money as a 'traveling masseuse" to a wealthy Palm Beach man. + +All the lawsuits against the billionaire money manager said his modus operandi in the initial visit was the same: the minor girl was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Bulb Way and led upstairs to a spa room by one of Epstein's assistants, where he would ask the girl to perform massages and/or various sex acts, for which he would pay her. + +lawsuit said she was sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers, which included royalty, p iticians, academicians, businessmen and others in various locations around the world. + +4 + +EXHIBIT + +Epstein attorney Ackerman did not return a call for comment. + +— who spent four years with Epstein — relit as "a monster" who paid her lavishly to satisfy his and his friends sexual whims — although doesn't identify the friends. + +says she would meet one of Epstein's friends on his private island in the Caribbean or at his ranch in New Mexico, both of which were isolated, and she was "given to men ranging in age from their 40s to their 60s." + +To detach herself from reality, said, she began taking Xanax —"up to eight pills a day: + +Other revelations by in the Mail: Epstein and Maxwell told her they wanted her to have his child. That, she told the Mail, was "a wake-up call" to get out of the situation. + +Fort Lauderdale atto has represented several of Epstein's undera ' ' In addition, Epstein and have filed lawsuits against each other. leges was involved in false claims made by Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein, while alleges pstein filed a frivolous lawsuit to get him to back down from representing the victims. + +"I feel terrible ' is and all of the other girls that were sexually abused, but I was not surprised at all by the story," said. "I represented several girls that, similar to Virginia, were very young and vulnerable and were badly abused by Epstein. These girls will never completely heal from what they went through. What is most troublesome though is that these serious crimes went virtually unpunished. I currently represent several victims that want Epstein prosecuted for the crimes he committed against them, which is why we filed a claim under the Crime Victim's Rights Act in an effort to overturn the illegal plea deal and get true justice for these victims." + +S + +Find this article at: + +hapPwww.palmbeachdailynews.com/news/jeffrey- ?ir nt'SS.' tIt'easd-woman-to-prince-andrew-she-1288718.html + +, Print this page El Close + +# BRIEFINGWIRE + +A Free Press Release Website + +[Join](#) | [Login](#) + +## Briefing Search + +Keyword: + +Category: + +[Clear](#) + +[Search](#) + +[Submit Your Press Release](#) + +[Biz Directory](#) + +[RSS Feed](#) + +[SEO Tips](#) + +[Questions?](#) + +## Author Details + +[BARD Marketing](#) + +[www.bardmarketing.com](http://www.bardmarketing.com) + +[SHARE](#) + +[F](#) + +[E](#) + +[C](#) + +**News Reports about Billionaire Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Highlight the Importance of Victims Rights** +Hundreds of news articles have reported billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's close relationship with Britain's Prince Andrew. Attorney Brad [REDACTED] has pursued victim rights cases on behalf of ten women who were sexually molested by Epstein. + +## Ask a Lawyer Online Now + +12 Lawyers Are Online. + +Current Wait Time: 14 + +Minutes. + +[Law.JustAnswer.com](http://Law.JustAnswer.com) + +[SHARE](#) + +[Ads by Google](#) + +[BriefingWire.com](http://BriefingWire.com), 3/08/2011 - Contact + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. + +(954) 524-2820 + +[REDACTED] Sailer, BARD Marketing/PR + +(561) 637-2575 + +Fort Lauderdale, FL -- In the last week, hundreds of news articles have reported billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's close relationship with Britain's Prince Andrew. Attorney Brad [REDACTED] has pursued victim rights cases on behalf of ten women who, between 12 and 15 years of age, were sexually molested and abused by Epstein. The stories of their abuse have all the trappings of a Hollywood movie, including posh settings + +[Ads by Google](#) + +## Find a Lawyer - Free + +Free, Confidential + +Lawyer Locator. Save + +Time - Describe Your + +Case Now! + +[www.LegalMatch.com](http://www.LegalMatch.com) + +## Ask a Lawyer Online Now + +27 Lawyers Online + +Now Answer Your + +Questions In Minutes. + +[eAnswer.com/Law](http://eAnswer.com/Law) + +## Sexual Abuse + +### Allegations + +We wrote the book on + +defending false + +molestation + +allegations + +[www.FalseAbuse.com](http://www.FalseAbuse.com) + +## Local 1-Day + +### Coupons + +Up to 90% Off the + +Best Stuff To Do! + +Restaurants, Spas, + +Events and More. + +[www.LivingSocial.com](http://www.LivingSocial.com) + +## The Diana Screen + +Employment screening + +tool. Help prevent + +child molestation. + +[dianascreen.com](http://dianascreen.com) + +at Epstein's Palm Beach Mansion, private Caribbean island and his jet. But Epstein's heinous sexual abuse of these victims is no fiction. + +██████████ successfully represented these women, obtaining justice for each of them, by proving that Epstein and his international sex trafficking criminal enterprise exploited them and hundreds of other underage girls. + +This recent wave of news coverage highlight the importance of the victims rights work that Attorney ██████████ does on behalf of victims of sexual molestation and other sexual abuse. ██████████ conducts extensive investigations and pursues civil lawsuits against sexual predators to protect the rights of his victim clients and to hold sexual predators, like Epstein, accountable. + +Many sexual predators, like Epstein, are wealthy and powerful and able to focus vast resources and high profile legal teams in an attempt to deflect attention, avoid criminal liability, and deny justice to their victims. Speaking of his work on the Epstein cases, ██████████ says "we took on powerful people and sought to level the playing field to protect victims." + +Representing these women has made ██████████ aware that child sexual abuse is extremely prevalent. According to a U.S. Health and Human Services study, more than 83,000 substantiated reports of sexually abused children were made in 2005 alone. The actual number of incidents of sexual abuse is likely much higher because it is believed that sexual abuse, especially amongst children, is significantly underreported. + +██████████ hopes that the media attention focused on Epstein's sexual abuse will "inspire victims to report these crimes" and will convey his belief "that victims rights cases can effectively protect their rights, maintain their anonymity, and hold predators accountable." + +██████████, Jaffe, Weissing, ██████████, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., a Fort Lauderdale Litigation firm, focuses on Consumer Class Actions, Sexual Abuse Cases as well as other significant Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, and Whistleblower Suits (qui tam). The firm is headquartered at 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort + +Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and may be reached at (800)400-1098 or(954)524- 2820 Additi I i formation about Brad r Jaffe, Weissing, Fis os ehrman, P.L. may be o am from the firm's website at wyew.pathtojustice.com. + +FAQs I Contact Us I Terms & Conditions I .481k . privacy Policy 11 onarviennowmuc i S 94) + +# The Telegraph + +# Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer + +The Epstein, York could be asked to give evidence in two separate legal cases involving Jeffrey is paedophile friend, The Daily Telegraph has learnt. + +![](_page_18_Picture_4.jpeg) + +Jeffrey Epstein and Glaslaine Maxwell stayed at Sand Photo: ALSANPIX/GEOFF PUGH + +By 4onSwaine(bN:E/Airww,te ciprnalletecionzavrainca, in Palm Beach, Florida + +10:00PM GMT 10 Mar 2011 + +![](_page_18_Picture_8.jpeg) + +Follow Jon Swains on Twitt itsvItter.comkonswainel \,\* + +Lawyers for a Florida attorney who is being sued by Epstein have disclosed that they want to take a statement from the MIbecause they believe he may be able to shed fresh light on Epstein's alleged sex offences. + +Meanwhile the FBI has indicated that it will reopen Its criminal investigation into Epstein after receiving new Information. lie was convicted In 2008 for soliciting an under-age girl for prostitution. Sources in America have said the FBI could ask the IM to give evidence as part of the new investigation. + +Epstein, 58, was sentenced to 18 months in prison after admitting two sex offences as part of a plea bargain deal. But allegations were made against him by as many as 40 girls, of whom 17 have settled civil claims they brought against the billionaire. + +4 + +Epstein is himself suing Brad a lawyer for several of the girls. Epstein alleges that Mr was linked to a fraud committed by a former colleague — a claim dismissed by the local bar association — and that his clients' cases against Epstein were therefore invalid. + +- - - + +?Unclips Beatrice end Princess Eugehlepgysfic, for row over-of York's trade role ihttyllywnctetegregh,co.ukfnews!yknewsflheroyaffamily/\_8408879/Princess-Eleatrice-and-Princess-Eygenitget price -for-row-over-Duke-of7Yorks-trade-role.htmg + +Further equity on.= of WO civet lobbying (httplAyww.teltyggh.co.ukinews/uknewsAherooffainily/8372507/Further-scrutin -o lobtaishht9311 -eve 0 + +Timeline: the ofYork's questionable friends (htiplbwew.teigir\_aph.cc,ukinerysfuknew!Itherpiellamily/83§6227/Timelinathe-Du -Y4irks-questionablefrierid!html) + +Labour MP: Prince Andrew Is 'an embarrassment' (httplAwAv.tele video/8366220/Labour-MP-Prince-Andrew-is-an-embarrassme + +Duchess negotiated debtgatoff for several months Ihffp://wyrw.telestragh.co,ukinipsys/ulwwsithesgyffilla 1/Duchass-offifork-ppent-hine-monthstegctiatingz Alth-convicted:peedophile-.Jeffre.tEpstein-to- \_ikhtml) + +Mr , meanwhile, claims Epste Is eb sing the legal system by seeking to intimidate other lawyers and girls, and is counter-suing the financier for sub gal damages. + +He is seeking to prove to the cowl that Epstein did sexually abuse dozens of children, allegedly at his Florida mansion in most cases, where theM enjoyed holidays and massages. Jack Scarola, the lawyer representing Mr M, told The Daily Tel \*We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. + +'We wan additional details on the scope of Mr Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United States for sex. + +"We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr Epstein while Mr Epstein has been in the company of under-aged children.' + +Asked whether he had any reason to suspect the had been present while under-age girls were abused, Mr Scarola said: "That's not something I can publicly comment on. We have an ongoing investigation and an ongoing prosecution of a civil case. These are not matters of public record and I am restricted in what I can say on the public record." + +There is no allegation that the ■ **had** sexual contact with any of the girls or that he was aware of any wrongdoing by Epstein. + +Mr Scarola added: 'Deposition testimony has been taken generally concerning Mr Epstein's association with many high -profile people? + +Documents filed in the case so far include Epstein's private phone directory — which included numerous contact details for the along with masseuses and dozens of other prominent Mends. They also include flight logs for Epstein's private jet, which detailed a trip the IM took with him in 2000 and a 1998 meeting between Fapstein. the Duchess of York and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. + +Mr Scarola said he anticipated 'significant procedural impediments" In obtaining sworn deposit to his ability to claim diplomatic immunity. He said he may be forced to turn to international0 + +'The Hague Convention specifically outlines procedures that must be followed forth aim co country to be compelled to give testimony regarding a case pending in another,' he said. + +A Buckingham Palace spokesman declined to comment. + +![](_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg) + +### Jeffrey Epstein address book 'Holy Grail' of famous names + +By MICHELE DARGAN DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER + +Updated: 7:58 p.m. Friday. March 11, 2011 + +Posted: 7:57 p.m. Friday. March 11, 2011 + +Print this page s close + +When talking about the personal address book of billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, m little black book" takes that phrase to a whole new level. + +Manhattan money manager Epstein's book reads like a laundry list of the world's CI most powerful people, including some Palm Beachers. + +Referred to as "The Holy Grail" by Epstein's former house manager — now s' erving time for trying to sell it to attorneys — the 97-page address book details multiple addresses, phone numbers, e-maj other contact information for former President Bill Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew and Sarah Donald Trump, Sen. John Kerry, various members of the Kennedy dan and former British Primmer Tony Blair, among many others. + +, The British pres • g a field day digging up new deteils,about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew. — known o ne Doe 102 in court papers — has been dishing her story to London's Dal y Mal . Details include having been in the company of the prince three times at Epstein's behest. + +also recounted meeting Clinton on Epstein's private Caribbean island, according to the Mail. + +reporMilarly, there is no suggesti - of aChing salacious with any of the Palm Beachers listed But made no suggestion of sexual relations with Prince Andrew or with Clinton, the Mail among the money manager's contacts', . ) r + +— who spent four years with Epstein — ref ri as "a monster" who paid her lavishly to sans is and his friends sexual whims — although doesn't identify the friends. + +British papers also have reported accepted £15,000 from Epstein. The as paid to her former assistant, who claimed owed him unpaid wages and other bills. has since told the Mail and other British papers that she made "a gigantic error of judgment" in accepting the money from Epstein and that she will pay him back. + +The entire "their was made public as part of a pending civil court case in which Epstein is suing attorney Brad Edwards, who represented several underage girls who sued Epstein. + +tied Edwards, alleging he was involved in false claims made by Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein; countersued Epstein, saying he filed a frivolous lawsuit to get him to back down from representing the young women. + +All the lawsuits against Epstein said his modus operandi in the initial visit was the same: The girls were taken to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion and led upstairs to a spa room by one of Epstein's assistants, where he would ask the girls to perform sexually charged massages and/or various sex acts, for which he would pay them. + +Other high-profile names in Epstein's book include Special Envoy f ' le East Peace Mitchell, New York City Mayor Mi New York Gov. Andrew , Barbara Walters, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, , Dustin Hoffman, Kevin pacey, Liz Hurley, Lauren Hutton, Janice Dickinson, Naomi nsty Turlington, Henry Kissinger, Joan Rivers, Courtney + +![](_page_21_Picture_20.jpeg) + +Mick Comelia Guest, Phil Itzhak Perlman, LeBon, Charlie , Richard Branson, playwright Candace Bushnell, designers Tom and Verigg, soap opera ac ress and erotic film star Koo Stark, who once dated Prince Andrew. + +Among the high-powered Palm Beachers listed in the money manager's address book are Catherine and Fred Adler, Samantha and Serena Boardman, Jimmy ane Buffett, Pepe I, Conrad and Barbara Bla Goldsmith, Marjorie Gubelman, Hammond, David , Henry Kravis, Frayda and Lindemann Sr., Bob and Todd Meis er, Alfred Taubman, n ey, Bea and Brett Tollman, an Trust. + +Gaston Cantens, a spokesman for Florida Crystals Corp., said Fanjul and Epstein 'obviously knew each other and had some contact in the past. But there isn't any ongoing business or social relationship with Mr. Epstein." + +Reached by phone at his Palm Beach home, media mogul Black said he knew Epstein as "a friend of my colleague Mr. Wexner." + +Les Wexner, CEO of The Limited Brands, was reported to have been Epstein's biggest client and close friend. Wexner replaced Epstein as his money manager, according to recent reports. + +Some of the names in Epstein's book are sub-listed under geographic locations. The heading "massage" is notated under many of Epstein's locations. Names and phone n bersjmost of them first names only, are listed under the massage entries. + +Registered as a level 3 sex offender, Epstein pleaded guilty to 'icitiilg s underage girls for sex at his El Brill° Way home in Palm Beach. In addition to serving 13 months of an 18-month jail sentence, Epstein has settled at least two dozen lawsuits with young women for undisclosed amounts. + +Find this article at: + +htlpiNvww.palmbeachdailynews.corninewstieffr 4 y-") dress-book•holy-grail-of•famous-1315130.hlmi + +£ Print this page a Close + +# Prince Andrew's link to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein taints royalty in US + +The of York's friendship with billionaire convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein has put him on American front pages + +![](_page_23_Picture_6.jpeg) + +guardianzauk 711sObservar P.r.rg votwid 12,1 + +Kodak NI-In-One Printers + +A inik, + +![](_page_23_Picture_9.jpeg) + +CO SA + +Paul Horde NewYak The Observer, &SOU Minh ton + +l'atoce Audraw Is Cod,et I, Dienithips mode Inittnutivual cumleatioo Thototn ;L. Frtyndo ArrLeatqlNcybPA + +The British press has a new admirer. Spencer Kuvin, a Florida lawyer who has fought several cases for young women alleging sexual abuse by the disgraced billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, is delighted — and relieved — that papers are now examining Prince Andrew's relationship with the convicted + +'I am glad the British press has picked this up, Kuvin told the Observer. 'The British . people have a right to ask why he rrti,Cit Andrew] is hanging out with a convicted paedophile. I think that is a very go'a'd question to be asking." + +Kuvin has been asking it for a while. He believes Epstein has in effect gut away with most of his crimes because of his wealth and his connections with the powerful and wellconnected across America end the world. + +"He's fine. He Sigreat life." he said of the man who spent less than two years in jail after p to child sex offences. + +That is probably true. Florida law allows anyone to find out the whereabouts of a convicted sex offender via an online database. According to the website last week Epstein's location was St in the US Virgin Islands In the Caribbean. He owns a private island there: one that Prince Andrew has visited. "Epstein is probably sunning himself on a beach right now." Kuvin said. + +The same cannot be said for the of York. 'Ws weekend, as be considers the parlous state of his international reputation, he is likely to feeling a lot less comfortable than his one-time party friend. + +It was not meant to be this way for the prince. America is supposed to be a happy hunting ground for the British family. It is a place where the people see them as EXHIBIT + +exotic celebrities to be feted, admired and placed alongside the homegrown 'royalty" of Hollywood. + +American citizens and politicians - freed from the burdens of paying for a civil list of their own - can indulge in the sort of innocent worship of monarchical "glam" that typified Britain in the togos. + +So recent headlines in the US media have come as a bit of a shock. "Seen around town: Prince Andrew and Pew Billionaire," blared the New York Post. "Duchess of York apologises for accepting money from sex offender," read the New York Daily News. So much for the eager anticipation of a slew of good publicity around the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton. + +It was not just the American tabloids. Even the Wall Street Journal ran a lengthy piece last week prompted by the fallout from Prince Andrew's long friendship and close relations with Epstein, 58, who served 18 months for sexual offences involving underage girls. No wonder New York Post columnist Andrea Peyser weighed in on the controversy about what she called a "bromance" between the pair. Prince Andrew, she concluded, was an "idiot prince". + +It is hard to fathom the depths of the PR disaster that continues to unfold around the prince because of his links to Epstein. After he was snapped walking side by side with Epstein through Central Park last December, Andrew has seen his entire globetrotting existence as a trade ambassador put under the microscope. It has not borne up well. + +Suddenly his life and times partying with Epstein have become public knowledge, complete with sordid details of being surrounded by young women and being present at topless pool parties. A woman, MM who provided sexual services for Epstein and his rich friends while underage, saw the photograph and decided to speak about her experiences. Another picture rapidly surfaced, of side by side with the prince. To cap it all, Andrew's links to a whole series of unpleasant developing world autocrats and dictators have also come under fresh ifig n, + +None of it has made a pretty picture and the t pe typically — have been slow to react in any meaningful way. First. the )ble norecL Then it was dismissed. Only now, belatedly, have they begun to ress it th reports that the Queen has talked to Andrew privately. It feels too littiar tonlite. + +Like many Europeans, perhaps, iltialse\_ve enjoyed the US because of the freedom and opportunities it afforded. The socitif'ceilein glittering hotspots like Manhattan and Florida's Palm Beach allCed him thfree himself from the stuffy world of aristocratic Britain. He was courtt6 won over by the rich elite and he repaid the compliment. + +No one knows y the 'n carried on such a close friendship with a figure like Epstein for I he refused to end it after Epstein went to jail. The facts alone should ve a ^ ning sign. Epstein, a working class Brooklyn boy who became a super- y mo manager, was one of the world's most renowned playboys. But in scroll, after a tee-year investigation into the young women he and his entourage procured, he wound up in jail. Nor was it an isolated incident. Epstein's case was ended via a plea bargain when he admitted guilt on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution involving a minor. Yet as many as eo young women had made allegations against him and, unusually, his plea deal allowed other accusers to sue him in civil court. So far at least o of them have settled civil cases against him. + +The American drama is far from over for the prince. Instead the legal wranglings around Epstein and his exotic lifestyle threaten to drag the family right into the US court system. + +Epstein is now suing Brad S a lawyer for some of the girls from the original investigation. In turn is counter-suing Epstein, alleging that the billionaire is using his vast resources to pursue expensive legal cases and thus intimidate other victims and their legal representatives. Either way, Andrew could be pulled into the mess as a witness. lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince about what he mayor may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein. + +Though the prince is likely to claim diplomatic immunity, that step will not keep his name out of the court papers or the headlines: it will just keep his presence out of the Courtroom. + +The same thing goes for previous cases Involving Epstein. They amount to a potential source of PR torture for the family as media scrutiny continues. Recently released documents from a different case showed that two of Epstein's closest confidantes - his PA Sarah Ellen and an on-off girlfriend, - were repeatedly questioned by Kuvin about whether the prince had been involved in sexual acts with any of Epstein's entourage of young women. Both Ellen and declined to answer the questions and instead took the Fifth Amendment, which allows their legal silence. + +Of course, there is no evidence or suggestion that Andrew was involved. But in PR to there does not need to be. There is even a small chance that the FBI will use some new revelations emerging in the media to reopen the criminal case against E though legal experts think it unlikely. + +Even the hint of a possibilty of a federal probe is another reason for to start sharpening their pens for those with links to Epstein. + +Prince Andrew is not the only one. Epstein has partied in Neebrk mous people since he left jail, including big names and celebritleafike Katie uric, Stephenopoulos end Woody M. Perhaps they too haveNown better. + +### CONNECTIONS + +le Ghillie ine Maxwell, 49, youngest dat\*hter rt Maxwell, the former Doily Mirror proprietor, is considered one of Prince Andrew's more controversial friends. A decade ago, he was reported to have accoritpanied her to a "hookers and pimps" party in New York. Ghislaine moved to th in 1991 after the death of her father and became a fixture on the Manhattan party d ere she befriended Jeffrey Epstein. + +■ **Goga Ashkenazi, glarnO Kazakh oil tycoon, claims to be a "close friend" of Prince Andrew. Ashlte Oxford-educated socialite and entrepreneur, said: 'Britain is very aye ." She was introduced to Andrew in 2001 and they have been friend his guest at Ascot in 2ooy, although she denies rumours that they have eve? uple.** + +■ Tarek tuni, a convicted Libyan gun smuggler, is an old friend . In zoo8 he and Andrew enjoyed a four-day holiday to Tunisia. Kaituni was convicted of buying a machine gun in 2Oos and secretly attempting to transport it from Holland to France. + +teerdisa.mukO0uardisa Nom to4 media LmIted aim + +# Independent.co.uk of York's friend could be back in US courts + +Lawyers to question Prince Andrew's sex offender associate. + +By Jonathan Owen Sunday, 13 March 2011 + +A The of York's attempts to quell the furore surrounding his relationship with the bill It e sex offender Jeffrey Epstein appeared doomed this weekend when it emerged that more lurid defallw e aired in a US court within the next two weeks. + +Buckingham Palace was forced to deny that the IM of York had postponed p ns fo a trip to Saudi Arabia next week, because of negative media coverage, amid reports in some la t e controversy had made him "toxic". A spokesman said: "Buckingham Palace has never annou overseas visits for the of York." + +The issue refuses to die down, with two Lib Dem ministers bretili\r 'i )last night and privately suggesting they think Prince Andrew should quit as trade envoy. Onesa%"Itclie was a politician doing this, he would have gone by now, and rightly so." Another added: "That 21st century we should be putting up with this is obscene. It is Incredibly difficult for the Government; M e \le SO- the Tory side, but it cannot carry on.' + +Even attempts by supporters to rally to his caus4pave n of mixed benefit. The Duchess of York's apology for a "gigantic error of judgement" in acceptirtnlangy from Epstein only served to fuel reporting, as did reports of the Prince's links to Kazakhstan-ind tikysocialite Goga Ashkenazi, who is reported to have had been involved in the sale of the home,toezar oil billionaire Timur Kullbayev. There was also criticism last ,- week when it emerged that the prinCe lobbie0'MP Mark Field this week to help to boost UK exports to oil-rich Azerbaijan, a country with a questio1iabledliuman rights record. N— + +Now US lawyers hope to use I dispute between Epstein and Brad , a Florida attorney, to insist that Epstein reveal mor abou is relationship with the prince. Epstein will be questioned on allegations he procured sexual favo from hors for friends and forced to answer allegations that he abused up to 40 girls. Many of the most da a recent headlines about the = of York have centred around a photograph of him with his arm ar nd Irl ho claims she was abused by Epstein. + +Jack Scarola, one of the lawyers close to the case, said: 'We are in the process of scheduling a further deposition of Mr Ed. at which we intend to question him regarding the details of his child abuse, Including all circumstances in which he may have been involved in procuring sexual favours from minors for his highprofile friends." + +Asked whether the was with Epstein when minors were present, he said: "The details of that relationship will be a subject of inquiry when Mr Epstein's testimony is taken." The FBI is said to be ready to reopen its criminal investigation Into Epstein, convicted In 2008 for soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. A number of women are challenging a plea bargain deal which allowed the billionaire to avoid trial. Epstein, 58, was sentenced to 18 months in prison after admitting two sex offences. + +None of this will help Prince Andrew's attempts to damp down coverage questioning his judgement an 11 his choice of associates as he travels the world as a commercial envoy for the UK. emir + +*Additional reporting by Andrew McCorkell, Emily Dugan and Matt Chorley* + +--- + +**©independent.co.uk** + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +# Victims of Sexual Abuse Demand Justice + +Last week the Philadelphia archdiocese suspended 21 Roman Catholic priests who were named as child molestation suspects in a scathing grand jury report released last month. + +FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE + +(Free-Press-Release.com) March 17, 2011 - Contact + +MI Jaffe, Weissing, **Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.** + +(934) 524-2820 + +■ **Sailer, BARD Marketing/PR** + +**ksailer@bardrnarketing.com** + +**Fort Lauderdale, FL -- Last week the Philadelphia archdiocese sus 21 Roman Catholic priests who were named as child molestation suspects in a scathing grand jury report released last month. Regarding another sex scandal, over the last two weeks, hundreds of news articles have reported billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's close relationship with Britain's Prince Andrew. Jaffe Weissing Attorney Brad has pursued victim rights cases on behalf of ten women who, between 12and 15 years of age, were sexually molested and abused by Epstein. proved that Epstein and his international sex trafficking criminal enterprise exploited them and hundreds of other underage girls.** + +**Powerful organizations like the Catholic ChtfrCh have been able to shelter accused priest and clergy as there continues to be no mention of penalties, censures, or removal from office for bishops who continue to hide and cover-up for the abusive priests. Many sexual predators, like Epstein, are wealthy and powerful and able to foctis vast resources and high profile legal teams in an attempt to deflect attention, avoid criminal liability, and deny justice to their victims. According to a U.S. Health and Human Servi ,%ore than 83,000 substantiated reports of sexually abused children were made in 2005 alone. e a ual number of incidents of sexual abuse is likely much higher because it is believed that sexual abuse, especially amongst children, is significantly underreported. Sexual abuse and molestation cause great suffering for victims. Victims often deal with unimaginable humiliation and shame and it often leaves long-lasting emotional and psychological damage.** + +**hopes that the media attention focused on the recent Philadelphia archdiocese sex scandal and on Epstein's sexual abuse will continue to "inspire victims to report these crimes" and will convey his belief "that victims rights cases can effectively protect their rights, maintain their anonymity, and hold predators accountable." At Jaffe Weissing, our goal is to help sexual abuse victims obtain justice, counseling and compensation for their suffering. If you or a loved one has been abused by a** + +![](_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg) + +priest / clergy, a teacher, a scout leader or anyone else, please don't hesitate to contact Jaffe Weissing at 80o-40o-1098. + +Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., a Fort Lauderdale Litigation firm, focuses on Consumer Class Actions, Sexual Abuse Cases as well as other significant Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, and Whistleblower Suits (qui tam). The firm is headquartered at 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and may be reached at (80o) 400-1098 or (954) 524-2820. Additional information about Brad or , Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, + +P.L. may be obtained from the firm's website at http://www.pathtojustice.com. cdc + +#4# + +## Press Releases + +### APRIL 2011 + +#### [REDACTED] *Jaffe Weissing Proudly Supports National Volunteer Week* + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman supports National Volunteer Week (April 10-16). Our firm is very involved in giving back to our communities. Members of our firm support various charities, sit on non-profit boards, and do volunteer work with local schools and religious organizations. We are community-conscious and believe we have an obligation to give back o a society that has afforded so much to us and our families. + +Want to make a difference too? Visit the sites below for local volunteer opportunities: + +- • Volunteer Broward: +- • Volunteer Match: + +### MARCH 2011 + +Thank You Letter from the Alzheimer's Association, Southeast Florida Chapter + +Here is a wonderful letter we received from the Alzheimer's Association, Southeast Florida Chapter thanking attorney Steven Jaffe for the \$100,000 donation, which was a court approved payment of a settlement fund, as a result of the long-term care insurance class action law suit - Ruderman v. Washington National Insurance Corporation. + +#### Brad [REDACTED] Files Motion in Jeffrey Epstein Case - Violation of Crime Victim's Rights Act + +Attorney Brad [REDACTED] filed a motion in Federal Court this week saying the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by signing a nonprosecution agreement with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein without notifying his clients. News coverage included the Palm Beach Post and Main Justice. + +#### Join TEAM LINDSAY - Crohn's & Colitis Takes Step Walk + +Attorney Steven Jaffe's daughter Lindsay suffers from CROHN'S DISEASE...this is an incurable disease of the intestines. Each year we join other families to WALK FOR CROHN'S. This year's 1-mile walk is Saturday, April 16, 2011, at 7pm at Huizenga Plaza on the Las Olas Riverfront. Won't you please consider helping our TEAM LINDSAY, click here for details. We'd also love for you to walk with us! + +#### Gary M. [REDACTED], Sr. Joins The Firm + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing is pleased to announce that Gary M. [REDACTED], Sr., retired Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge, has joined the firm, as of-counsel and will provide litigation support and appellate representation in both civil and criminal cases. + +#### London Papers Quote [REDACTED] in Recent Jeffrey Epstein / Prince Andrew Scandal + +London newspapers recently quoted attorney Brad [REDACTED] regarding billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's close relationship with Britain's Prince Andrew. Last year [REDACTED] helped 10 women seek justice, who were sexually molested and abused by Epstein. National and local news coverage included London's The Telegraph, London's Daily Mail and South Florida's Palm Beach Daily News. + +#### Firm Sponsors Alzheimer's Association Gala + +[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing proudly supports The Times of Your Life Gala honoring the Alzheimer's Association. Click here for program. + +![](_page_30_Picture_201.jpeg) + +# FEBRUARY 2011 + +Lehrman Presents at Nova Southeastern University School of Law + +Attorney Seth Lehrman recently gave a lecture to law students at Nova Southeastern University Shepard Law Center on the Ethical Challenges Arising From a Law Firm's Sudden Dissolution. + +Weissing's Care Success Story + +Attorney and Parent Matt Weissing wasailed in the Junior League of Boca Raton's Winter 2011 magazine • The Bridge, discussing his experience with being a parent. + +# JANUARY 2011 + +Jaffe Presents \$100,000 Check to Alzheimer Association + +Attorney Steve Jaffe and Co-counsel Steven M. Dunn presented a \$100,000 check to the Alzheirner's Association, Southeast Chapter. The cy pres award (a court approved payment of settlement funds) was a result of a precedent setting long-term care Insurance class action law suit - Ruderrnan v. Washington National Insutporporation. + +Jaffe Nominated Volunteer of the Year + +Attorney Steve Jaffe has been named Volunteer of the Year by the Flori the Crohres Et Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA). + +# DECEMBER 2010 + +Class Action Settlement Creates \$8 Million Fund For Elderly Floridians + +Judge James I. Cohn of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted final approval of a class action settlement which creates an \$8 million fund for elderly class members with home healthcare insurance policies issued by Washington National Insurance Company (WNIC). The agreement also places all those elderly insureds back on claim, meaning the Insurance company will now be responsible for the cost of care of our clients. + +Attorneys Steve Jaffe and Mark Fistos also received court approval that required WNIC to make a \$100,000 cy pres award (donation) to a charity whose mission is to serve the needs of the elderly — the court approved the Alzheimer Association as recipient of the donation. + +Mowat, et al v. DJSP Enterprises, Inc., et al. + +Attorneys Gar Mark Fistos Seth Lehrman and co-counsel, who are representing former employees of the law firm of David J. tern and a related company, have filed a federal class action lawsuit asking for back wages and benefits because they claim that hundreds of employees were fired without 60 days' advance notice, as required under federal law. + +The suit charges that Stern's law firm and its publicly traded processing unit DJSP Enterprises didn't follow the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or WARN Act requirement to give employees 60 days warning — plus pay and benefits — before a mass layoff. Local news coverage included \$outh Florida Business Journal Sun-Sentinel, Miami Herald Palm Beach Post, and CBS4 Miami. + +## OCTOBER 2010 + +Weissing Nominated 2010 Most Effective Lawyer + +Attorney Matt Weissing was selected as a 2010 Most Effective Lawyers semi-finalist by the editorial staff of the Nay Business Review. + +# AUGUST 2010 + +United States of America v. Scott VI. Rothstein + +Attorney \$eth Lehrman prevailed in the firm's prosecution of criminal forfeiture and restitution claims on behalf of thirtyseven former Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (WA') clients who sought to recover more than one million dollars of settlement monies that had been deposited Into a trust account of the RAA law firm prior to Scott Rothstein's widely publicized theft of those monies. After the implosion of RRA, our firm agreed to represent these individuals free of charge. The court's order detailed the monies owed to them. Outside the courthouse, Mr. Lehrman commented, "This is full justice for good and deserving people." Mr. Lehrman 's victory has been the subject of several media reports, including, the Sun Sentinel Bloomberg, South Florida Business Journal and s La + +Gelco Indemnity Co. v. Physicians Group, LLC, alabo Paul Androski + +Attorney Gar.. drafted the winning brief in Gelco Indemnity Co. v. Physicians Group, LLC, alralo Paul Androskl, in which the Secon strict Court of Appeal confirmed on August 13, 2010, that the fee schedule amendments to the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, S 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) ("PIP") effective January 1, 2008, do not apply retroactively. The courts ruling settles an issue which has been hotly contested In lower courts. + +# JULY 2010 + +Mercedes Zota, it at v. Lighthouse Intracoastal Inc., et al. + +Attorney Matt Weissints case, Mercedes Zoto, et al v. Lighthouse Mir C., et at., was the subject of an article in the Daily Business Review. + +# JUNE 2010 + +Named FJA Treasurer + +Attorney Caryl. is being sworn in as Treasurer of the Florida Justice Association. Gary has served as Secretary of the Florida Just ce soclation since June 2009 and served on its Board of Directors since 2005. + +\$10,800,000 Verdict + +Attorney Matt Weissinq received a jury verdict of 510.800,000 on behalf of a client who sustained brain injuries when she fell and struck her head while working at,construction site. + +# MAY 2010 ec + +\$735,000 Verdict + +Attorney Brad €dwards won a \$735,000 jury verdict In a case brought on behalf of truck driver who lost three toes due to a warehouse accident. + +Class Certification Upheld + +The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion upholding the trial court's order certifying p multi-state class in Saltzman V. Pella. Case No. 06 C 4481, which is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Attorneys Steve Jaffe and Mark Fistos are handling the case. + +Prevails on Key Rulings In Epstein Case + +Attorney kill succeeded in convincing a federal Judge that billionaire Jeffrey Epstein must disclose specific figures showing s ne worth. Brad also received a favorable rulingallowing his client access to a recording and transcript of a recording of a reporter's off-the-record interview with Epstein. The reporter's newspaper had sought to have the materials protected from disclosure based on a "qualified reporter's privilege.' Brad Is representing several young women in civil suits In which they allege Mr. Epstein sexually assaulted them when they were teens. Trial is set to begin July 14, 2010. + +Lehrman Represents Football Great, Sapp, and Others in Forfeiture Proceedings + +Attorney 5eth Lehrman has filed papers in forfeiture proceedings in bankruptcy court on half of Sa and others to recover monies they lost in trust funds held by Portz' schemer. 5tott Rothstein which were never accounted for. + +# April 2010 + +\$520 million Whistleblower Recovery + +Attorney Ga m.. resolved a Whistleblower suitagainst pharmaceutical giant Astraleneca, which will pay \$520 million In civil ines and restitution to state and federal entities. The firm disseminated a press release on the case. The U.S. Attorney General Issued remarks about the settlement. The federal Department of Justice also announced the settlement. The settlement agreement is available on our site. + +# March 2010 + +Law School Presentation + +Firm Attorney Seth Lehrman gave a presentation on law practice management at Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad Law Center In Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. + +# February 2010 + +Firm Hosts FJA Event + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. hosted a Florida Justice Association member appreciation reception on the rooftoplarm's ft. Lauderdale offices. Phosos were taken of the event. + +Qui Tam Presentation + +Firm attorney Gary Ml was a presenter at the Florida Justice Association's Workhorse Seminar In Orlando. He spoke on Qui Tam litigation, which has been the focus of much of his law practice. Qui Tam suits are also commonly known has whistleblower suits. Gary was one of the originating attorneys In the Qui Tarn settlement involving Eli Lilly and the drug Zyprexa that resulted In a record \$1.42 billion dollar settlement for illegal off label marketing of drugs. Gary has handled notable class actions and other Qui Tam settlements. + +# January 2010 + +Class Certification Granted in Long Term Health Insurance Case + +The firm won a contested class certification ruling for the class action plaintiffs in one the firm's long term health insurance cases, Ruderman, et al., v. Washington Notional Insurance Company filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 08-CV-23401-COHN/ROSENBAUM. Attorneys Steve Jaffe and Mark Fistos are representing the Injured parties as Plaintiffs' counsel in this class action case. The defendant's petition to appeal the order was denied on March 4, 2010. The case has been stayed pending settlement discussions. + +Jaffe Sworn in as BOA President + +Attorney Steve Jaffe commenced his tenure as President of the Broward County Justice Association with his inaugural message to BCJA members. + +# November 2009 + +Nova Presentation + +Attorney Seth Lehrman was a presenter a law office management workshop at at Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad Law Center in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. + +October 2009 + +Attorney Brad assisted with a victim's rights workshop in Orlando. + +September 2009 + +Jaffe Appointed CCFA Board Member + +Attorney Steve Jaffe was appointed to the Board of Trustees of the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (Florida Chapter). Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America is a non-profit, volunteer-driven organization dedicated to finding the cure for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. + +June 2009 + +Clan Certification Granted in Pella Windows Case + +With their co-counsel, attorneys Steve Jaffe and blink Fistosprevalled for the injured v&ims nitmed as plaintiffs on a contested multistate class action certification motion pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in the class action case Saltzman v. Pella, Case No. 06 C 4481. + +February 2009 + +NationsRent Administrative Fee Clan Action Settled + +With their co-counsel, firm attorneys Steve Jaffe and hiark-Fts-iwo or the a class ction plaintiffs a contested nationwide class certification In in Re NotionsRent Fee Litigation Case No. 06.60924•CIV filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. A settlement Mr reach for c ass. The court entered an order finally approving the settlement on March 31, 2010. + +January 2008-Present + +Weissing Continues to Serve Care Community + +Attorney Matt WgissIng continues to volunteer for 4Kids of South Florida which provides Safe Place I W rvices for every dependent child which Is taken into care in Broward County, serves children and those providing Care, Adoption, Crisis Pregnancy, and provides stability for kids who are aging out of the II.I cares stem. tt and his family first became involved with the organization In 1996, when they accepted responsibility or a = son. + +Seeing the needs of- children throughout our community, Matt became an advocate for -children making numerous appearances al radio stations, speak ore community organizations, in churches, etc. In 2008, 4Kids was recognized by the House as the model for Care in the United States. + +![](_page_35_Picture_18.jpeg) + +Hichelle E. Breaux This is great information. Thank you for sharing it. + +March 9 at 11:21am + +![](_page_35_Picture_21.jpeg) + +**Jeffe Weissing** +In the last week, hurricane of news articles have reported laborate pediatric jettrey England's does redistantly with Balanis Pirace Anatem. Attained Blad Edwards was interviewed by several publications - London's The Telegraph, London's Daily Past and the Palm Booch Daily News. Last year [REDACTED] (netpod 10 women seek jutters, who were sexually motivated and abused by England. To view coverage visit [fmw.pathlobstice.com/fm](http://fmw.pathlobstice.com/fm) and sent for forest information) + +![](_page_35_Picture_23.jpeg) + +**Pauric Bardington - S.A.R.** + +**A precipitate this.** + +**Joa Zepnick 5 d em, Prad** + +**Pat [REDACTED] Board Congress Great Labur** + +**Madeline Garcia Superman** + +March 17 at 10:15am + +![](_page_35_Picture_30.jpeg) + +**NOT A CERTIFIED CONTRACT** + +r 4. %or; er• + +2 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +3 CASE NO.: 562010CA000161 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 15TH + +JUDICIAL cmcui-r, IN AND FOR + +4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +5 Plaintiff, + +6 vs. + +7 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, + +J. individually, + +8 And L.M., individually, + +9 Defendants. + +10 + +11 + +12 HEARING BEFORE: HONORABLE DAVID F. + +13 DATE TAKEN: March 31, 2011 + +14 TIME: 8:32 a.m. to 8:53 a.m. + +15 PLACE: Palm Beach County Co + +16 West Palm Beach, Fl + +205 N. Dixie Highway, R + +17 REPORTED BY: Kathleed RPR + +18 + +19 + +23 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +24p i + +25 + +• Ar\_ + +5 + +1 allegations. + +2 THE COURT: Okay. Well, I thought I — well, + +3 never mind. Go ahead. + +4 MR. SCAROLA: What Your Honor will see, when you + +5 have a chance to take a look at that amendment to the + +6 complaint, is that there has been an effort to try to + +7 remove from the complaint any assertion that Mr. Epstein + +8 was not guilty of the underlying crimes and torts that + +9 resulted in his criminal prosecution and the civil claims + +10 against him. However, in spite of that effort - because + +11 what they have attempted to state, as they describe it in a + +12 very recent submission to Your Honor, the case management + +13 report - is an abuse of process claim against Mr. M. + +14 And the theory of the abuse of process claim is that + +15 Mr. Epstein is an innocent man who was falsely + +16 a serial pedophile who openly victimized you rts\ch + +17 the presence of his high profile friends. Falsely + +18 targeted, with those allegations, for the sole purpose of + +19 attempting to enhance the marketability of Ponzi scheme + +20 interests in those claims. That's the Plaintiffs theory. + +21 Still hasn't been able to articulate how he is damaged by + +22 that because its not a defamation claim because the last + +23 thing they want to do la pat Mr. Epstein's reputation in + +24 contention • 's litigation but that's what they claim. + +25 Mr. cozy of this case is that Mr. Epstein + +t' t il + +4 t e ( IT C4 4. + +'t- r. • ; • tli . • + +Cs + +4.- + +12/4 + +li + +00006 + +I was and is an incorrigible pedophile who victimized scores 2 of children internationally and openly in the presence of 3 his high profile friends. And that among the victims of 4 his RICO activities, because in the underlying case there 5 were RICO claims, among the victims of his RICO activities 6 were the particular individuals that Mr. was 7 representing before he ever joined the Rothstein Law Firm. 8 And that all of his efforts to investigate and prosecute 9 those underlying claims were good faith efforts conducted 10 in total ignorance of anything that was going on, as far as II Mr. Rothstein was concerned. And that the sole purpose of 12 the lawsuit filed against Mr. and one of his 13 clients, while those cases were still pending, was to 14 intimidate Mr. to abandon his very vigorous 15 investigation and prosecution of those claims. 16 So whether we look at it from the pers pec' • 0 17 Plaintiffs theory of the case or whether we a k alit 18 from the perspective of the Defendant's theory of the case, 19 what Mr. — excuse me — what Mr. Epstein was, in 20 fact, doing is relevant and material. Clearly it's 21 relevant and material from the counterclaim perspective 22 because we allege a motive to cover-up an extensive pattern 23 of international crime. That's why he's trying to scare 24 Mr. off, intimidating him through this abusive 25 process (' use he doesn't want the details of his \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1bfd22ce6227faf060df4b7e8391043c8a2f3f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/EFTA02769703.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2448 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 39, + "chars": 75522, + "elapsed_seconds": 103.62, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_11_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_11_Picture_21.jpeg", + "_page_13_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_18_Picture_4.jpeg", + "_page_18_Picture_8.jpeg", + "_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg", + "_page_21_Picture_20.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_6.jpeg", + "_page_23_Picture_9.jpeg", + "_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg", + "_page_30_Picture_201.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_18.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_21.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_23.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN \nAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 316.938, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 511.33551025390625, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 511.33551025390625, + 128.60302734375 + ], + [ + 316.938, + 128.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.37199999999999, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 381.78000000000003, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 381.78000000000003, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 219.37199999999999, + 127.98000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein introduced woman to Prince Andrew, she tells London 'Daily Mail'", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.872, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.7420043945312, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.7420043945312, + 143.91650390625 + ], + [ + 67.872, + 143.91650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BRIEFINGWIRE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.416, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 241.188, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 241.188, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 82.416, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Briefing Search", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.99, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 186.648, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 186.648, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 99.99, + 156.32999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Author Details", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.486, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 372.08399999999995, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 372.08399999999995, + 156.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 291.486, + 156.32999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ask a Lawyer Online Now", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.52200000000002, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 358.14599999999996, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 358.14599999999996, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 234.52200000000002, + 398.52 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Find a Lawyer - Free", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 533.28, + 161.19 + ], + [ + 533.28, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 173.34 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ask a Lawyer Online Now", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 533.28, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 533.28, + 255.96000000000004 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 255.96000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Sexual Abuse", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 495.102, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 495.102, + 332.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 332.09999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Allegations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 482.98199999999997, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 482.98199999999997, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 342.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Local 1-Day", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 486.01200000000006, + 400.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 486.01200000000006, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 413.09999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Coupons", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 469.04400000000004, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 469.04400000000004, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 423.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Diana Screen", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 419.352, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 516.3119999999999, + 492.48 + ], + [ + 516.3119999999999, + 505.43999999999994 + ], + [ + 419.352, + 505.43999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Telegraph", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 193.26898193359375, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 193.26898193359375, + 113.5616455078125 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 113.5616455078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal \ninvestigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 534.2132568359375, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 534.2132568359375, + 167.29425048828125 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 167.29425048828125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Jeffrey Epstein address book 'Holy Grail' of famous names", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.69, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 406.9300842285156, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 406.9300842285156, + 144.66650390625 + ], + [ + 69.69, + 144.66650390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Prince Andrew's link to sex offender \nJeffrey Epstein taints royalty in US", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.93199999999999, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.5931396484375, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 349.5931396484375, + 178.90924072265625 + ], + [ + 73.93199999999999, + 178.90924072265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONNECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.75, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 224.3926544189453, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 224.3926544189453, + 440.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 75.75, + 440.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Independent.co.uk \nof York's friend could be back in US \ncourts", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.842, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 498.6659851074219, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 498.6659851074219, + 165.60498046875 + ], + [ + 64.842, + 165.60498046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Victims of Sexual Abuse Demand Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.81199999999999, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 424.7000732421875, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 424.7000732421875, + 100.1827392578125 + ], + [ + 61.81199999999999, + 100.1827392578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Press Releases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 181.79999999999998, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 181.79999999999998, + 110.16000000000003 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 110.16000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APRIL 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 154.53, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 154.53, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing Proudly Supports National Volunteer Week", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 332.088, + 157.95 + ], + [ + 332.088, + 170.1 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 170.1 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MARCH 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 165.438, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 165.438, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 315.09000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Brad [REDACTED] Files Motion in Jeffrey Epstein Case - Violation of Crime Victim's Rights Act", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 431.472, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 431.472, + 397.71 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 397.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Join TEAM LINDSAY - Crohn's & Colitis Takes Step Walk", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 288.456, + 443.07 + ], + [ + 288.456, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 453.6 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Gary M. [REDACTED], Sr. Joins The Firm", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 209.07, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 209.07, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 520.83 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "London Papers Quote [REDACTED] in Recent Jeffrey Epstein / Prince Andrew Scandal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 564.5699999999999 + ], + [ + 393.90000000000003, + 564.5699999999999 + ], + [ + 393.90000000000003, + 576.7199999999999 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 576.7199999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Firm Sponsors Alzheimer's Association Gala", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 631.8 + ], + [ + 241.79399999999998, + 631.8 + ], + [ + 241.79399999999998, + 643.1400000000001 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 643.1400000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FEBRUARY 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.63, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 201.94070434570312, + 76.94999999999999 + ], + [ + 201.94070434570312, + 99.94146728515625 + ], + [ + 63.63, + 99.94146728515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JANUARY 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.63, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 191.48382568359375, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 191.48382568359375, + 231.8555908203125 + ], + [ + 63.63, + 231.8555908203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DECEMBER 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.63, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 199.78265380859375, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 199.78265380859375, + 375.09552001953125 + ], + [ + 63.63, + 375.09552001953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OCTOBER 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.63, + 605.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 190.46136474609375, + 605.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 190.46136474609375, + 625.2255554199219 + ], + [ + 63.63, + 625.2255554199219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AUGUST 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 77.41485595703125 + ], + [ + 181.73500061035156, + 77.41485595703125 + ], + [ + 181.73500061035156, + 99.9415283203125 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 99.9415283203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JULY 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 155.78524780273438, + 279.45 + ], + [ + 155.78524780273438, + 300.4755554199219 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 300.4755554199219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JUNE 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 157.4026641845703, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 157.4026641845703, + 385.9755554199219 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 385.9755554199219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MAY 2010 ec", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 171.0938262939453, + 497.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 171.0938262939453, + 518.3555603027344 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 518.3555603027344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "April 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 131.01904296875 + ], + [ + 153.97035217285156, + 131.01904296875 + ], + [ + 153.97035217285156, + 152.092041015625 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 152.092041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "March 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 236.3890380859375 + ], + [ + 163.28709411621094, + 236.3890380859375 + ], + [ + 163.28709411621094, + 257.092041015625 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 257.092041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "February 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 321.51904296875 + ], + [ + 188.14901733398438, + 321.51904296875 + ], + [ + 188.14901733398438, + 342.592041015625 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 342.592041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "January 2010", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 483.51904296875 + ], + [ + 178.72035217285156, + 483.51904296875 + ], + [ + 178.72035217285156, + 504.592041015625 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 504.592041015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "November 2009", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.024, + 644.7590484619141 + ], + [ + 196.2516632080078, + 644.7590484619141 + ], + [ + 196.2516632080078, + 665.4620361328125 + ], + [ + 63.024, + 665.4620361328125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 186 + ], + [ + "Text", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 85 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ], + [ + "PictureGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 107 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 132 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 35 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 101 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769703" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8fa538ef56335085acf5a10e987dfdab78b597cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3c75f5449efd0fed6cc18d572d80d853226f6a969f38abd644d641f185bc9c33 +size 10575 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_21.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_21.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a06118277f3def6ba20cc1e67e0f47eb31b8bd83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_11_Picture_21.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f7224003f5af2a11a8824e9ef09f5c6735e5fd61aeb889f1ff833c77b350763f +size 5716 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_13_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_13_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..125beef97ab265fc02671517df5e58a2d0bd5271 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_13_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7f081698cf1e81fc04c4f92fc5893de39fce6f8a765841243d3342aea1d1346f +size 10701 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e0ae8c23ba1aefc3d616f1a3cef9660cc930343 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:64491088e1cf2cf7cc85652a9cf3ac61de9e1ab41e281e51f9c14bc91a7615d3 +size 52980 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_8.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97d2de74bf57eb499bb824d5a66afcd93e7fec2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_18_Picture_8.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3cf8c28a01c97f5441efaccf54893c7ddfcf3d11ba3303bc21681bef582f5b49 +size 2572 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d80ec868177617d0510efe9fea6b4d9d35d423ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c0eb9924ef6d1e96b41fb371c7071e9a328681b69f1ac49e696b6a66a816da0c +size 7974 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_20.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_20.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5143c883fa8f1516abe01b80f2e2c39da5d34a27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_21_Picture_20.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55926c48d690afc007c2394356fc3002408319a7ebafe778154a538daea8b018 +size 5673 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_6.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50f907d44ff401be34682c155c196faa49ce5355 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_6.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d4eb2cda6afd6023215c7f8a399e1fdf2573a4865fe1f9c920ec08adc67617b8 +size 2078 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_9.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11bb7708e8ea5c6e846716047d7bbab734a65db5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_23_Picture_9.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d3421c22f2f152a54ef96f37d17e9729a26eab39d5ee23f589e3484bca64ae1f +size 28459 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..526ece769236f186c3b46fbc2a45dd483058f074 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_28_Picture_14.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:46717329ceb0b22b249784102fbc92ab55b8ec057069813afff7e0ba3cbc22c3 +size 6709 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_30_Picture_201.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_30_Picture_201.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac8b26db30f6ee6f6a1b9fafdc108738ed538f5a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_30_Picture_201.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa27ce2ec6937e9066f8c812871cb704766feb5b3bfef3b5a4886c58b2d3f126 +size 5904 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_18.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d4b8913dbe03d42c2f6aaf4b2710662fe8e5dd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_18.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b58ef112763b8a7377cf6b4ba0e932d995d8cef3507d2abeb4321b41492ad30b +size 1551 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_21.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_21.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9343a34d227479a6b05d62d7191983d4d0c46b2a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_21.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0db2df0befcb510669c84d3270276a8982fb904def960b77c56d82243a0699b5 +size 1941 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_23.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97909f3571df62bd07214940dea0a9989d76e0cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_23.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2a05ebe30d75479ecf0a1cc85667016b2e71476ea8340203efd7365337799b6e +size 5449 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5a36a9745677af2aa85e7ca0d77337810a523f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769703/_page_35_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8d2e361b11bfc990106d55458080f30cd6eeacd02296edef03c344539a14bf45 +size 7271 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0ef5ff983fd29e92a820f340baac7543fb38794 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +**PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF PENDING MOTIONS** + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel files this Plaintiff's Supplemental Statement of Pending Motions pursuant to this Court's Case Management Order entered April 12, 2011, to be heard on May 19, 2011 (D.E. 289). The Joint Statement of Pending Motions (D.E. 301) was previously filed with the Court. + +**PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTIONS** + +1. 1. Epstein's Motion to Compel/Motion to Determine if Privileged Claims are Waived (D.E. 232); +2. 2. Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Regarding the Video Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 287); +3. 3. Epstein's Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order to Prevent Deposition of Alfred Seckel, served May 2, 2011; +4. 4. Epstein's Amended and Supplemental Motion to Overrule Objections and Compel [REDACTED] to Answer Questions and Appear for Further Deposition (D.E. 230); + +FILED +11 MAY - 6 PM 4:08 +SHARON H. ROCH, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +PALM CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +5. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey E2stein's Amended Motion for a Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extrajudicial Statements and Commentary to Media and Press, With Incorporated Legal Authorities. ( Response to this Motion is at (D.E. 301); + +6. Plaintiffs Request for Production tc dated April ; %2Sand Response/Objections to Plaintiffs Request for Production). 14/ .) + +# DEFENDANT, + +7. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amen 9omplaint, served April 17, 2011 (D.E. 295); + +8. Motion for Protectiv d Objections to Canceled Notice of Taking Deposition and Appointment of S e: (D.E. 249); + +9. Motion to bye Damage Claims, argued with ruling pending; + +10. Motio nsideration of Order Sustaining Plaintiffs Objections to Discovery dated Decembe , 010, (D.E. 168), argued with ruling pending; + +11. Ed ' M t 'on to Compel and Impose Sanctions for Failure to Appear for Deposition (D ) + +wards' Motion to Permit Additional :nterrogatories (D. E. 280). + +## NON-PARTY MOTIONS + +13. Spencer Kuvin's Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Subpoena for Joint Privilege Documents (D.E. 267); + +14. Non-Party Podhurst & Orseck, P.A.'s Motion for Protective Order and Stay Order, served March 31, 2011 (D.E. 278). + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and +mailed this 6th day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()![]()901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a6db668d236a95dc4915e8694cc65735cc21ce0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742/EFTA02769742.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769742.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3307, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.67999999999998, + 48.779999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.713, + 48.779999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.713, + 77.235 + ], + [ + 145.67999999999998, + 77.235 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF PENDING MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 301.623 + ], + [ + 498.9539999999999, + 301.623 + ], + [ + 498.9539999999999, + 316.257 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 316.257 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 174.81599999999997, + 438.20700000000005 + ], + [ + 428.542, + 438.20700000000005 + ], + [ + 428.542, + 452.841 + ], + [ + 174.81599999999997, + 452.841 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.56, + 295.36 + ], + [ + 439.95599999999996, + 295.36 + ], + [ + 439.95599999999996, + 312.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 157.56, + 312.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NON-PARTY MOTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.462, + 599.872 + ], + [ + 367.8125915527344, + 599.872 + ], + [ + 367.8125915527344, + 615.7324981689453 + ], + [ + 228.462, + 615.7324981689453 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769742" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67e3e803257cf00b06dc5a417e2fca2b57c99457 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +#291874/mep + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)O5XXMBAG + +at, r - 2Z) r CO + +## RESPONSRSOCINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE OF APRIL 7, 2011 + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, by and through his undersigned attorneys and pursuant to Rule 1.35=) 0 St" da ules of Civil Procedure, hereby responds to Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's roduce dated April 7, 2011 as follows: + +- 1. Objection. The id tiff lion of specific public statements made by Epstein is protected by th ey work product privilege. +- 2. Objec lege. The identification of documents "reflecting or tending to support" legal taken on behalf of the Defendant is protected by the attorney work product +- 3. Objection. The identification of documents "reflecting or tending to support" legal positions taken on behalf of the Defendant is protected by the attorney work product privilege. + +• . + +adv, Epstein, et al. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +IHEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and/or U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attac t, this 5 day of May, 20 + +Jack + +Flori No.: 169440 + +Sy enney Scarola Bamhart pley, P.A. + +2 alm Beach Lakes and + +est Palm Beach, Fl • + +Phone: (561) 686- + +Fax: (561) 38 + +Attorney for + +adv. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff(s) Response to Request to Produce + +## COUNSEL LIST + +MWeinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 d ek + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Fax: (561) 835-8691 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 1 4 + +CO 'f + +S ) + +9 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 S " Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein ( Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Attorney For: Scott Rothst n One E Broward Blvd., Suit 700 Fort LauderdaCL '18301 Phone: (954) 45-5849 Fax: (954) 6 + +erman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. Attorriar: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..738bb00cd3d3882fb3ee9542e92cce767845d155 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745/EFTA02769745.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769745.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2437, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RESPONSRSOCINTIFF'S \nREQUEST TO PRODUCE OF APRIL 7, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 178.76999999999998, + 326.8 + ], + [ + 449.98291015625, + 326.8 + ], + [ + 449.98291015625, + 356.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 178.76999999999998, + 356.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 154.105 + ], + [ + 348.37091064453125, + 154.105 + ], + [ + 348.37091064453125, + 169.103515625 + ], + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 169.103515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769745" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c705a9d7242b9dd3f47a918b7cffe00825be247 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Ha. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +m P. C. + +• + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby offers the following response in opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff (" I") motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint and states: + +1. on page motion to dismiss is perfunctory and conclusory, cites no supporting authorities, a ontains no valid arguments supporting dismissal. The Amended Complaint satisfieal of the elements of a cause of action for abuse of process, and has not demoted otherwise. + +t is axiomatic that a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits all well-pleaded facts as true and that the allegations and reasonable inferences therefrom must be construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See, e.g., Morris v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 753 So. 2d 153, 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("[Al complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action 'unless the movant can establish beyond any doubt that the claimant could prove no set of facts whatever in support of his claim."); Sant v. Ruden, + +McClosky, , Schuster & =, P.A., 742 So. 2d 381,383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). has not met his substantial burden. + +3. initial argument that the "Introduction" to the Amended Complaint is "surplusage apparently intended to defame Mr. . . ." does not on its face state a basis for dismissal of the Amended Complaint on any ground. His critique of the Introdhction does i not indicate any deficiencies in the abuse of process claim and should be stricken-or disregarded. + +4 There is no merit to contention that the Amended Complaint does not identify the "process" that was allegedly abusive, or when, o on whom, it was served. misapprehends the nature of an abuse of proc Under Florida law the tort of abuse of process requires proof that the judicial sy isused for ulterior purpose judicial/spy, an after an action was filed and process served. SeeA, Ila-Donna v. Nova University, Inc., - , 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); McMurray v U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209-10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The filingLof an action itself is not abuse of process. Della- / - Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1056. The Amended Complaint details numerous instances of actionable abuse of process by (See Amended Complaint ¶¶ 29-32). + +5. Min/next "argument" that the Amended Complaint does not "articulate a cognizable thethen ordamages" caused by his wrongdoing flatly ignores the allegations of the Amended CdIpl &tit at ¶ 34, that set forth the damages caused by his abuse of process. Moreover, ominal damages and attorneys' fee costs are sufficient to support a claim for abuse of process. See, e.g., Stoler v. Levinson, 394 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). + +6. Equally flawed is Defendant's penultimate "argument" that the Amended Complaint does not "identify any conduct outside the protection of the litigation privilege. " does not advance any argument as to how the litigation privilege applies to the facts + +asserted, and does not cite a single supporting authority. In addition, litigation privilege is an affirmative defense and has not shown that such a defense appears on the face of the pleading. See Ingalesbe v. Stewart Agency, Inc., 869 So. 2d 30, 34-5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)(dismissal of claim for interference with fee contract on basis of litigation immunity reversed where affirmative defense did not appear on face of complaint). has not, and cannot, point to allegations that the misconduct was done pursuant to c so t rde so as to i be given absolute immunity. See American Na:'! Title & Escrow of F1' ,, ., 810 So. 2d 996, 997 (Ha. 4th DCA 2002). Cf. SC! Funeral Services of Florid Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 702, 710 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(noting that a cause of actj@t malicious prosecution is not barred by the litigation privilege)." The reasoning in f3 tef. cowries Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 337 F.3d 297, 312 (3d Cir. 2003) is persuai v ondtis point: + +> GRC mainly argues hat Ibe judicial privilege cannot possibly apply to these circumstances because "[i]t is illogical on the one hand to say that discovery abuses and filing frivolous motions can support an abuse of process claim because those actions are incident to the litigation process, and on the other hand to say that those actions are ab tely privileged because they are co unications issued in the litigation process." argument has a good deal of logical appeal. e mere existence of the abuse of process tort is vidence that judicial privilege applies to a much narrower range of activity than the attorney appellees urge. Where judicial process is being perverted, immunity would impede, not further, the interests protected by the judicial privilege. + +7. Finally, reliance on arguments he raised in his previously-filed motion for summary judgment is unavailing. Obviously, the standards are not the same for a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and a motion for summary judgment. It is wellestablished that on a motion to dismiss, the court is limited to review of only the "four corners" + +of the complaint. References to another pleading or exhibits is inappropriate. Second, his motion for summary judgment was directed to a prior complaint, and significantly, the motion was denied by this Court. has not shown, and cannot possibly show, how a summary judgment motion directed to the allegations of the prior complaint, which motion was denied on the ground that it was "premature," supports dismissal of an amended co plaint with new allegations. Moreover, argued in support of summary jud t o he prior abuse of process claim that Epstein alleged only that he "was unhapp, me motion or argument made by n that the facts established that "everY action took was 7 entirely proper"; and that there was no evidence that an ulterior motive. (Ex. A, Ny) Motion for Summary Judgment at 13-15). What the evidence may or may not ultimately prove with respect to the propriety of conductr and,whether he had an ulterior motive, is entirely irrelevant to the issue of whether t allegations in the Amended Complaint, taken as true and with all reasonable inferences.r-orm' efrom drawn in favor of the Plaintiff, state a valid claim for abuse of process. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff \_JEFFREY EPSTEIN respectfully submits that Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint be denied. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Vewunpv,t L. Ac en-Ilan, Esq. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 BURNETT P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for .Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff and + +E. Knight Fla. Bar. No. 607363 BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-92 Facsimile: (305) 789-9 Attorneys for Jeffrey laintiff + +## CERTIFICATE OF SER + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct co foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this wto day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shiple , lc P. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 ,S ) + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue Sottth Suite 1400 West Palm Beach. 33401I-5012 + +Marc S. N Law Offi One E. Ft. La S. Nurik vd., Suite 700 e, FL 33301 + +By: h L. Ackerman, Jr., E Fla. Bar No. 235954 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0a080c4736e5678a4f8c68b6975baa5fc7dbe0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748/EFTA02769748.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769748.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 7735, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.23, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN \nOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.23400000000001, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 510.14837646484375, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 510.14837646484375, + 362.238037109375 + ], + [ + 84.23400000000001, + 362.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.16199999999998, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 384.838, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 384.838, + 315.10748291015625 + ], + [ + 222.16199999999998, + 315.10748291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769748" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c32897400d4358ce88ceb6794112caa05cb80f47 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.md @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +• ILL <09 2 n° n ct) Srl r \_nz t r -7X 1 F Fri 0 + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, x ms s o J. individually, and z xi. \_c a >7.-... L.M., individually, — + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF H + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED t ai§ct dersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: Wednesday, May 1 I + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorabl w, David F. (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +PLACE: 20 . Dix Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: + +## SPEC ERS TO BE HEARD: + +- laintiffs Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order to prevent Deposition of Alfred Seckel; and +- 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Additional Interrogatory + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +E-Mail and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 24th day of May, +2011. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Phone: + +Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +5. C 44.111\' S)C + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algiin acomodamiento para poder narticipar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator" por lo menos 7 dfas antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacion si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim k: bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou •w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1792f11163f191a1cbe3a97a6dc6fb7af08a5c5c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753/EFTA02769753.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769753.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4018, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.57, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.981, + 71.253 + ], + [ + 534.88916015625, + 71.253 + ], + [ + 534.88916015625, + 114.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 309.981, + 114.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF H", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 240.555, + 345.618 + ], + [ + 370.272, + 345.618 + ], + [ + 370.272, + 361.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 240.555, + 361.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPEC \nERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 71.253, + 565.11 + ], + [ + 283.9461669921875, + 565.11 + ], + [ + 283.9461669921875, + 581.3625030517578 + ], + [ + 71.253, + 581.3625030517578 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.652, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.611, + 127.98000000000002 + ], + [ + 352.611, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 260.652, + 142.56 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769753" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0ee5b8e32bde245d7d4fada3495745cd6098ee7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA04080XXXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING- (Special Appointment)** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has canceled the following hearing on the Special Appointment hearing before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED], one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on **Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.**, the following: + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES + +This hearing will be rescheduled to be heard at a later date not determined at this time. + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via email and U.S. Mail this 12th day of May, 2011 to: + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +One East Broward Boulevard +Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Epstein v Roth CASE NO. 502009CA040800 Epstein's Notice of Cancellation re: Am MPO re Extrajudicial Statements, etc. + +Jack Scarola, Esquire Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012. + +Obsep e an, Jr. + +Fla. 35954 + +. Knight + +Fla. Bar. Nc. 607363 + +Cos + +BURNETT, P.A. + +01 Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W 190275114CM Nonce of Cancellation of Hewn; 5-19-II Epson's Am MPO Extrajudicial Statements media, tic.-.ILA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a40029043ddb2462a13e7c73147bb66161b6aef3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758/EFTA02769758.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769758.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2002, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 150.28799999999998, + 50.529999999999994 + ], + [ + 461.16600000000005, + 50.529999999999994 + ], + [ + 461.16600000000005, + 79.055 + ], + [ + 150.28799999999998, + 79.055 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769758" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acc996d1ced016caf35cbb0157eb2234698ace60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FEARN R. BOCH, +JACK SEACH COUNTY FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 6 + +11 MAY 16 PM 3:15 + +FILED + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** + +**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the undersigned has set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. [REDACTED], one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in his Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, on Wednesday, May 18, 2011, at 8:45 a.m., the following: + +**PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATING TO THE DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL** + +PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355-4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +**I HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this 11th day of May, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409; and Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger + +& Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +*for [REDACTED] D. Tart # 358134* +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +WA80743\NOTHRG52-MPO re Alfred Seckel-MSG.docx + +NOTA CERTIFIED \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..969236eded57f9cffe4c0d0db8f031509611bb3d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760/EFTA02769760.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769760.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2042, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.528, + 68.47 + ], + [ + 460.86400000000003, + 68.47 + ], + [ + 460.86400000000003, + 96.86 + ], + [ + 146.528, + 96.86 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.90400000000002, + 346.525 + ], + [ + 364.8, + 346.525 + ], + [ + 364.8, + 360.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 235.90400000000002, + 360.71999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATING TO THE DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 76.0, + 482.62999999999994 + ], + [ + 525.9200000000001, + 482.62999999999994 + ], + [ + 525.9200000000001, + 509.34999999999997 + ], + [ + 76.0, + 509.34999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.92, + 630.4250000000001 + ], + [ + 380.0, + 630.4250000000001 + ], + [ + 380.0, + 642.9499999999999 + ], + [ + 221.92, + 642.9499999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769760" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51598d42f2dc2b3cdd91b4f6cb6c6ca62a9c61e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.md @@ -0,0 +1,330 @@ +1395 Brickell Ave 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 BURNETT, PA + +State of FLORIDA County of PALM BEACH CIRCUIT Court + +Case Number: 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXX MB AG Court Date: 5/17/2011 10:00 am + +Plaintiff: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +Defendant: SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND INDIVIDUALLY, J. + +• al.: n :C H CP C - C 7.1 • el m —.3 - n• 2n rrrn -C -4 '1 rn O + +0 + +Received b Gissen & Zawyer Process Service, Inc. on the 27th day of April, 201 'at pm to be served on ■ **600 GRAPETREE DR, UNIT 11CS, KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149** + +**I, MARIA GARCELL, do hereby affirm that on the 2nd day of May, 2011 at 7:33 am, I:** + +**NON SERVED THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION FOR THE REASON THAT AFTER CAREFUL INQUIRY AND DILIGENT ATTEMPT I FAILED F D INFORMATION TO ALLOW FURTHER SEARCH.** + +#### **Additional Information pertaining to this Service:** + +**THE SUBJECT NO LONGER LIVES AT THE PRO DED DRESS OF 600 GRAPETREE DR, UNIT 11CS, KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149. THE SERVER CONFIR TH SECURITY. SERVICE OF PROCESS WAS DISCONTINUED AT THE CL IENT'S REQUE** + +**I certify that I am over the age of 18, hayesno tin the above action, and am a Certified Process Server or an Appointed Process Server in good standing in t judicial circuit in which the process was served. Under Penalty of Perjury I declare that I have read the foregoing Return of Service and that the facts stated in it are true and correct. Notary not required pursuant to F 3. 92.525.** + +**+6s** + +**MARIA GARCEL Process Server #** + +**Gissen & Zawyer Process Service, Inc. 1550 Biscayne Blvd Suite 200 Miami, FL 33132 (305) 371-4664 Our Job Serial Number: ZPS-2011013464 Ref: 80743** + +SAM: ,:f+; + +WU, IN THE CIRCUIT • COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 v. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG + +Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and J. individually, Defendants. + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION + +Nts, + +600 Grapetree Dr. eS9 Unit I ICS Key Biscayne, FL 33149 TO: + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to ikbefore a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Ave., 14th Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on the 17th day of May, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with youratikat time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appeart(you-may be in contempt of court. + +You are su enaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this a omey or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +Dated on N 2011. + +Lilly Ann + +For the Court + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +*Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein* +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +Espirito Santo Plaza +1395 Brickell Ave. +14th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Fax: (305) 728-7579 +Florida Bar No. 195677 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +### I. Definitions + +1. "Document" as used herein means any document known to you and every such document which can be located or discovered by your reasonably diligent efforts and any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +any printed (whether typed or written by hand), recorded, taped, electronic (e:g., e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter from any source howtiajroduced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or 4 o neither, including the original and any copies which contain markings or not + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all writi + +all correspondence, notes, notations, recordings or other mem of any type of face to face or telephone conversations and interviews, meetings conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and long distance r slips), letters, telegrams, facsimiles, cables, papers, newsletters, memoiatkla, nter-office communications, releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamphlets, minutes of meetings, reports, analyses, evaluations, statements, diaries, calendars, dcsk pads, appointment books, stenographer's notebooks, transcripts, worksheets, journals, summaries, lists, tabulations, digests, newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and any material underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record whatsoever. + +2. "Written commun., cans any Documents evidencing communications between you and another perso or pe s of any kind, including but not limited to e-mails and text messages, transcripts and n + +3. "Referring " effecting," "regarding," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relating to" means in any why dire py or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. 6'An " and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to bring within the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. + +5. l "Epstein" refers to Jeffrey Epstein, the Plaintiff in the captioned lawsuit. + +6. MI, "you" or "yours" refers to Conchita Samoff. + +7. " means J. , a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +9. "RRA" means the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives and persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +10. "Searcy Denny" means the law firm of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +I I. ' Jaffe" means the law firm of Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of on persons to be affiliated with such law firm. + +12. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm (including law firms), corporation, organization, trust, arty of his/her or its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +13. Unless otherwise stated, the time fra Subpoena covers matters and Documents from January 1,2008, through the pres + +1. Any and all Docume ing or memorializing communications for the u ose of writing a book, whethe communications be oral or written, between you and , Rothstein or any past'or resent employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA including without limtation Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne Wayne Black, , Rick Fandry;Fara William Berger, Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representative& of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of nt'scort4luct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +ny and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the ur ose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +3. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present employees, independent oonentetors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purport& to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who have or had had claims against Epstein. + +4. Any and all Documents reflecting or, memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investinents in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: I + +- A. +- A. A.J. Discala; 4d/., + +B. any persons who claim to have invested directly or indirectly with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +5. An d all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the person t ding law firms) identified in items Mt 1-4 above. + +6. writing nd all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for the purpose of any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 1-4 above. + +7. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and , Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA, including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Rick Fandry, Cara , William Berger, Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +8. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged\_k involve Epstein. + +9. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing touca:in- Ceions for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or cons plated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of miscond claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +AS + +- A. Paul Cassell; A +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present em oyees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attomeys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who had claims against Epstein. + +10. Any and all(Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than/wilting atook, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Discala; and +- B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +11. Any and all Documents that you received for any purpose other than writing a book from any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items #4t 7-10 above. + +12. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for any purpose other than writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 7-10 above. + +13. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for the purpose of writing a book. + +14. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the\_substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or re. ng themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for any purpose other an i \*ng a book. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, +v. + +Complex Litigation, Flu. R. Civ. Pro.1201 +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +individually, +Defendants. + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: [REDACTED] +600 Grapetree Dr. +Unit 11CS +Key Biscayne, FL 33149 + +DNLH + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Ave., 14th Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on the 17th day of May, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on [Signature] April of 2011. + +[Handwritten signature] + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] + +For the Court + +NEGATIVE COPY + +SAME DAY RUSH + +Lill Ann + +Burnett, P.A, + +isif ie or Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein + +BURNETT P.A. + +Espirito Santo Plaza + +1395 Mickel' Ave. + +141b Floor + +Miami, FL 33131 + +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +Fax: (305) 72R-7579 + +Florida Bar No. 195677 + +G4¢ + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +#### I. Definitions + +1. "Document" as used herein means uny document known to you and every such document which can be located or discovered by your reasonably diligent efforts and any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +any printed (whether typed or written by hand), recorded, taped, electronic (e.g., e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter From any source, however produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or received or neither, including the original and any copies which contain markings or notations. + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all writings. + +all correspondence, notes, notations, recordings or other memorials of any type of face to face or telephone conversations and interviews, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited tu, telephone hills and long distance charge slips), letters, telegrams, facsimiles, cables, papers, newsletters, memoranda, inter-office communications, releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamphlets. minutes of meetings, reports, analyses, evaluations, statements, diaries, calendars, desk pads, appointment hooks, stenographer's notebooks, transcripts. worksheets, journals, stmunarics, lists, tabulations, digests. newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, anti any material underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of uny documents or record whatsoever. + +2. "Written communications" means any Documents evidencing communications between you and another person or persons of any kind, including but not limited to e-moils and text messages, transcripts and notes + +3. "Referring to," "reflecting," "regarding," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relating to" means in any way directly or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. "And" and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to bring svi 'n the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to tiii is scope. + +5. "Epstein." refers to Jeffrey Epstein, the Plaintiff in the captioned lawsuit. + +, "you" or "yours" refers to + +7. " means J.M. a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +8. "Rothstein" mewls Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +9. "RRA" means the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeidt & Adler. P.A...and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives and persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +1U. "Searcy Denny" means the law firm of Searcy, Denney, Scamla, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +I I. " Jaffe" means the low firm or Jaffe. Wcissing, MI Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., an any of its past or present emp oyees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners. shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +l2. "Person" means any individual natural person, pattnership, association, firm (including law firms), corporation, organization, trust, and any olkstis her or its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +13. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame fo Documents from January I, 2008, through the present. era covers matters and + +## 1!. + +1. Any and all Documents refketing 0 memorializing communications for the "s of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and Rothstein or any pest or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated including without limitation Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Rick Fondly, Cara MI William Berger, Adler and Mui=mk, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to he a t to cd with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +2. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the ose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written. between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, paruiers, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to he affiliated with Fanner Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +3. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cana; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mertnelstein; + +D. tiny past or present employees. independent contractors, attorneys. partners. shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who have or had had claims against Epstein. + +4. Any and all Documents reflecting ur memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investmen in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Discala; and +- B. any persons who :in to have invested directly or indirectly with Rothstein, including, without limitation, thoSe who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LW. +- 5. Any and all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the pet-sons (including law firms) identified in items rkti I -4 above. +- 6. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for the purpose of writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 1-4 above. +- 7. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications he oral or written, between you and Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA including without lisnitation Mike Ilsten, Ken Jenne Wayne Black, , Rick Fandry, Cant William Berger. Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing + +themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any 'time, regarding tiny pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +8. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, p share o ers, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations. surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +9. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any or the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance. incidents of misconduct or claims in tiny way involving ur alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present et, pl esw," independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representutives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who had claims against Epstein. + +10. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, post or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Disculu: and +- B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +II. Any and all Documents that you received for any purpose other than writing a hook from any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items \*HE 7-10 above. + +12. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for any purpose other than writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items WI 7-10 above. + +13. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RR A's cases against Epstein, for the purpose of writing a book. + +14. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research. information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of BRA' s cases against Epstein, for any purpose other than writing a book. + +As) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a98b7c6a64c952d5072c73cc10ac599477e44748 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762/EFTA02769762.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,816 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769762.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 25944, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 207.252, + 26.7269287109375 + ], + [ + 400.0516052246094, + 26.7269287109375 + ], + [ + 400.0516052246094, + 43.77093505859375 + ], + [ + 207.252, + 43.77093505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Service:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 48.48, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 278.3165283203125, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 278.3165283203125, + 400.872314453125 + ], + [ + 48.48, + 400.872314453125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.475, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 435.435, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 435.435, + 287.54999999999995 + ], + [ + 167.475, + 287.54999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.184, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.0878601074219, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.0878601074219, + 99.363037109375 + ], + [ + 257.184, + 99.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Definitions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.912, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 336.48773193359375, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 336.48773193359375, + 126.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 266.912, + 126.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.333, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 254.333, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 288.8, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 521.6640000000001, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 521.6640000000001, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 288.8, + 130.41 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.848, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 421.952, + 260.82 + ], + [ + 421.952, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 170.848, + 274.59000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.9056091308594, + 88.28999999999999 + ], + [ + 343.9056091308594, + 103.695556640625 + ], + [ + 259.18899999999996, + 103.695556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Definitions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.294, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 333.1232604980469, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 333.1232604980469, + 128.0755615234375 + ], + [ + 268.294, + 128.0755615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1!.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 372.09099999999995, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 372.09099999999995, + 381.2005615234375 + ], + [ + 251.90499999999994, + 381.2005615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 122 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 8 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 36 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769762" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b11a4e3da43303a837199e87a6d3e92f83678b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.md @@ -0,0 +1,486 @@ +State of FLORIDA County of PALM BEACH CIRCUIT Court + +Case Number: 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXX MB AG Court Date: 5/17/2011 10:00 am + +Plaintiff: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +vs. + +Defendant: SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND INDIVIDUALLY, **J. S** + +For: Lilly Ann BURNETT, PA 1395 Brickell Ave. ° 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 + +Received b Gissen & Zawyer Process Service, Inc. on the 28th day of April, 2011 at 4:23 pm to be served on ■ **430 GRAND BAY DR, KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149** + +**I, JOSE GARCELL, do hereby affirm that on the 3rd day of May, 2011 at 11:26 am, I:** + +**NON SERVED THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION FOR THE REASON THAT AFTER CAREFUL INQUIRY AND DILIGENT ATTEMPT I FAILED T /F Olt/FORMATION TO ALLOW FURTHER SEARCH.** + +**-n** rfn C + +### Additional Information pertaining to this Service: + +THE SUBJECT NO LONGER LIVES AT THE PROVIDED DRESS OF 430 GRAND BAY DR, KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149. AS PER SECURITY THE SUBJECT MOVED OUT OF UNIT 705 ABOUT 1 MONTH AGO. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE. SERVICE OF PROCESS WAS DISCONTINUED AT THE CLIENT'S REQUEST. + +I certify that I am over the age of 18, haVe no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server or an Appointed Process Server in good standlaginlhe judicial circuit in which the process was served. Under Penalty of Perjury I declare that I have read,the foregoing Return of Service and that the facts stated in it are true and correct. Notary not required pursuant to F:`\$:;92,525. + +> JOSE GARCELL Process Serve 1172 + +Gissen & Zawyer Process Service, Inc. 1550 Biscayne Blvd Suite 200 Miami, FL 33132 (305) 371-4664 Our Job Serial Number: ZPS-2011013597 Ref: 80743 + +SAME 11 kY RUSH + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, and J. individually, Defendants. + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.I201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSQ'ION + +-4 14 + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: 9 + +TO: S ( 9 430 Grand Bay Dr. Key Biscayne FL 33149 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to a ar'..fore a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Ave., 14th Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on the 17th day of May, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +### See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subgpenacd o appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this at ey or t court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on 2011. + +oy Black Lilly Ann + +For the Court + +Roy Black Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf, P A Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein 201 S Biscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 371-6421 Fax: (305) 358-2006 Florida Bar No. 126088 + +"inn + +Burnett, P.A. BuRNErr P.A. Florida Bar No. 195677 4 AC) ( S" + +Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein + +Espirito Santo Plaza + +1395 Brickell Ave. + +le Floor + +Miami, FL 33131 + +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +Fax: (305) 728-7579 + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +### I. Definitions + +I. "Document" as used herein means any document known to you and every such document which can be located or discovered by your reasonably diligent efforts and any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +any printed (whether typed or written by hand), recorded, taped, electronic (e,g., e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter from any source, howwt&produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or re o" neither, including the original and any copies which contain markings or not0 + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all writi + +all correspondence, notes, notations, recordings or other mem&iaWof any type of face to face or telephone conversations and interviews, meetings conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and long distance carp slips), letters, telegrams, facsimiles, cables, papers, newsletters, memoranda, inter-office communications, releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamphlets, minutes of meetings, reports, analyses, evaluations, statements, diaries, calendars, desk pads, appointment books, stenographer's notebooks, transcripts, worksheets, journals, summaries, lists, tabulations, digests, newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and any material underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record whatsoever. + +\_zur + +N - 2. "Written communications" 'means any Documents evidencing communications - - between you and another persotior persons of any kind, including but not limited to e-mails and text messages, transcripts and n + +3. "Referring effecting," "regarding," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relating to" means in any w y dir tly or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. A and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to b in the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed- outside its scope. + +5. "Epstein" refers to Jeffrey Epstein, the Plaintiff in the captioned lawsuit. + +6. "you" or "yours" refers to + +7. ' means J. a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +9. "RRA" means the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives and persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +10. "Searcy Denny" means the law firm of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +11. "[REDACTED] Jaffe" means the law firm of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +12. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm (including law firms), corporation, organization, trust, and any of his/her or its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +13. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame for this Subpoena covers matters and Documents from January 1, 2008, through the present. + +## II. Documents Requested + +1. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and [REDACTED], Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA, including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], Rick Fandry, Cara [REDACTED], William Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +2. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and [REDACTED] or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with [REDACTED] Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +3. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who have or had had claims against Epstein. + +4. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Discala; + +B. any persons who claim to have invested directly or indirectly with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +5. Any nd all bocuments that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the person (i uding law firms) identified in items \*frit 1-4 above. + +6. r'and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for the purpose of writin any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items alt 1-4 above. + +7. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and , Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA, including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, M, Rick Fandry, Cara , William Berger, Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +8. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, in surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or all Epstein. tigations, o involve + +9. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or cons plated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of mind r claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present eri 1oyees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including withour..limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who had claims against Epstein. + +10. Any and a uments reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other th ruing book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the Il mg persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, vestigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +A.J. Discala; and + +B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +11. Any and all Documents that you received for any purpose other than writing a book from any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items gtIt 7-10 above. + +12. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for any purpose other than writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 7-10 above. + +13. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for the purpose of writing a book. + +14. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for any purpose other than writing a book. + +7 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 1 RE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 v. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG + +Plaintiff, + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN i dividuully, and J. individually, Defendants. + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TEClUM FOR DEPOSIT! + +suet zud, mei + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Ms. Conchitu Surooff 430 Grand Bay Dr. Key Biscayne FL 33149 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED o appear het a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of White Burnett. P.A., 1395 Brickell Ave., 14° Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on the 17111 day of May, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to hove with you at that time and place the following: + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appear, you may bc in contempt of court. + +You are sub o appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this at Icy or f court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +oy Black Lilly Ann + +For the Court + +Roy Black +Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, P A +*Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein* +201 S Biscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 +Miami, Florida 33131 +Telephone: (305) 371-6421 +Fax: (305) 358-2006 +Florida Bar No. 126088 + +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +*Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein* +[REDACTED] WHITE BURNETT P.A. +Espirito Santo Plaza +1395 Brickell Ave. +14th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Fax: (305) 728-7579 +Florida Bar No. 195677 + +### SUIEDULE "A" + +### I. Definitions + +1. "Document" as used herein means any document known to you and every such document which can be located or discovered by your reasonably diligent efforts and any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +any printed (whether typed or written by hand), recorded, taped, electronic (e.g., eLmails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter from any source, however produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or received or neither, including the original and any copies which contain markings or notations, + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all writings, + +all correspondence, notes, notations, recordings or other memorials of any type of face to face or telephone conversations and interviews, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and long distance charge slips), letters, telegrams, facsimiles, cables, papers, newsletters, memoranda, inter-office communications, releases. agreements, contracts, hooks, pamphlets, minutes of meetings, rcports, analyses, evaluations, statements, diaries, calendars, desk pads, appointment books, stenographer's notebooks, transcripts, worksheets, journals, summaries, lists, tabulations, digests, newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and any material underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record whatsoever. + +2. "Written communications" means any Documents evidencing communications between you and another person or persons of any kind, including but not limited to c-mails and text messages, transcripts and notes. + +3. "Referring to," "reflecting," "regarding," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relating to" means in any way directly or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. 'And" and "or" shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to bring within the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. + +5. "Epstein" refers to Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiff in the captioned lawsuit. + +6. " . "you" or "yours" refers to Conchitu Sinnoff. + +7. "n means 3. a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +9. "RRA" means the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeld( & Adler, P.A., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners. shareholders. investigators, agents or other representatives and persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +10. "Searcy Denny" means the law firm of Scarcy, Denney, Scarola, Bambini & Shipley, P.A. and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +11. "= Jaffe" means the law firm of Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, , Fisios & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employee-s, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators. agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to he affiliated with such law firm. + +12. "Person" means any individual natural penon,/ ptirtnership, association, firm (including law firms), corporation, organization, trust, and 'any of his/her or its agents, employees. assigns or representatives. + +13. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame for this-Subpoena coven 'natters and Documents fmm January I. 2008, through the present. + +## 11. Documents Requested + +1. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the mi ur of writing u hook, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and l , Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys. partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to he affiliated including without limitation Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, , Rick Fancily, Cara . William Berger, Adler and Mark unk, or uny other representatives of or persons purporting to be a t fated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or seined litigation. investigations, surveillance. incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, + +2. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the ur se of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and Of any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation. past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +3. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the propose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation. past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +D. any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; atiLi + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you represent or represented in the past clients who have or hud had claims against Epstein" + +4. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Discala; and +- B. any persons who claim to have invested directly or indirectly with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. +- 5. Any and all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the persons (including law Finns) identified in items tuft I.4 above. +- 6. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for the purpose of writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items Int 1.4 above. + +7. Any and ull Documents reflecting or memorializing cominwneations for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications he oral or written, between you and . Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purportin t c ha with RRA, including without limitation Mike Piston, Ken Jenne Wayne Black, M, Rick Fondly, Cara William Berger. Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing + +themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation. investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +8. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purp se other than writing a book, whether such communications he oral or written, between you and or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders. agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Farmer Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation. investigtitiom, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +9. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing copimttsueatjors for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigution, investigations, surveillance, incidents of mis \ ncluct f, or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Cassell; +- B. Spencer Kuvin; +- C. Stuart Mermelstein; + +P. any past or prescut,emp1Ryeos, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to he affiliated with Seamy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who had claims against Epstein. + +10. Any and all, Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing u book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. A.J. Discalu; and +- B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. +- 11. Any and till Documents that you received for any purpose other than writing a book from any of the persons (including law (inns) identified in items ## 7-10 above. + +12. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for any purpose other than writing a book to uny of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 7-10 above. + +13. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing thei selves to have knowledge of RRA's caws against Epstein, for the purpose of wilting u book. + +14. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or materials about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RRA or rep:tenting themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for uny purpose other than writing a book. + +*gooe* + +*13597* + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, +Defendants. + +**SAME DAY +RUSH** + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Ms. Conchita Surnoff +430 Grand Bay Dr. +Key Biscayne FL 33149 + +*ONLA* + +**YOU ARE COMMANDED** to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Fowler [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Ave., 14th Floor, Miami, FL 33131 on the 17th day of May, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +*See Attached Schedule "A"* + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You are subpoenad to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on *Apr 28* 2011. + +![]()Roy Black +Lilly Ann [REDACTED] + +For the Court + +*Gando Bruy MAINAGE Memo* +*305 365 2712* + +Roy Black +Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, P A +Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein +201 S Blscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 +Miami, Florida 33131 +Telephone: (305) 371-6421 +Fax: (305) 358-2006 +Florida Bar No. 126088 + +Lilly App [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein +POWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. +Hispirito Santo Plaza +1395 Brickell Ave. +14th Floor +Miami, FL 33131 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Fax: (305) 728-7579 +Florida Bar No. 195677 + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +### SCHEDULE "A" + +## f. Pefinitiota + +1. "Document" as used herein means any docimenr known to you end every such document which can be located or discovered by your reasonably diligent efforts toad uny original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +uny printed (whether typed or written by Maid), recorded, taped, electronic (c.g., c-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter tram any source, however produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or received or neither, including the original and nny copies which contain markings or notations, + +all rataciiments, amendments and addenda of any and all writings, + +all correspondence. notes, ittXatious, recordings or other memorials of any type of lace to face or telephone conversations and interviews, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and long distance charge sliP8), letters. telegrams, facsimiles, cables, papers, newsletteni. memoranda, inter-office communications, releases, agreements, contructs, hooks, pamphlets, minutes of meetings, reports, analyses, evaluations, statements, diaries, calendars, desk pads, apticrintment books, Stenographer's notebooks, transcripts, worksheets, journals, summaries, lists. tabulaSions, digests, newspapers. periodical or magurint materials. and any material underlying,: supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record whatsoever. + +\Aar' 2. 'Written communications" trams any Documents evidencing cOlnmunications between you and another person or persons of any kind, including but not limited to and text messages, transcripts and notes. + +3. "Referring to," "reflecting," "regarding,' "supporting," 'evidencing" or "relating to" means in any way diroetlr or indirectly, concerning, disclosing, describing, co nning, or representing. + +4. 'And" and 'ice shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary In order to bring within the scope of each terpcst all documents which might !otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. + +pstein refers to Jeffrey Epstein, the Plaintiff in the captioned lawluit. + +6. 'M. "you" or "yours" refers to Conchita + +7. illill" means J. a defendant in the captioned lawsuit. + +8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in taw captioned lawsuit. + +9. "RRA" means the law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives and persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +10. "Searcy Denny" means the law firm of Searcy, Denney, Searola, Burnhart & Shipley, P.A. and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +11. "Farmer Jaffe" means the law firm of [REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. + +12. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm (including law firms), corporation, organization, trust, and any of his/her or its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +13. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame for this Subpoena covers matters and Documents from January 1, 2008, through the present. + +#### II. Documents Requested + +1. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and [REDACTED], Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick [REDACTED], [REDACTED], Rick Fandry, Cara [REDACTED], William Berger, [REDACTED], Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein at any time, regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +2. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and [REDACTED] or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with [REDACTED], Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +3. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +A. Paul Cassell; + +B. Spencer Kuvin; + +C. Stuart [REDACTED]; + +D. any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and + +E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past clients who have or had had claims against [REDACTED]. + +4. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for the purpose of writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual or purported settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +A. A.J. Discala; and + +B. any persons who claim to have invested directly or indirectly with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. + +5. Any and all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 1-4 above. + +6. Any and all Documents that you sent, delivered or transmitted for the purpose of writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items ## 1-4 above. + +7. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or written, between you and [REDACTED], Rothstein or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA, including without limitation, Mike Piston, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick [REDACTED], [REDACTED], Rick Fandry, Cara [REDACTED], William Berger, [REDACTED] Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing + +themselves to have knowledge of RRA•s cases against Epstein at any time, !regarding any pending or contemplated litigation. past or settled litigation, investigations surveillance. incidents of misconduct or claims in tiny way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +8. Any and till Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be oral or writtea, between you and =rn or any past or present employees, independent contractors, attorneys partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Jaffe regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or willed litigation, iivestiga ions, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein. + +9. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book, whether such communications be mill or written, between you and any of the following persons regarding arty pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation. investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or clairnr in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- A. Paul Casseil: tI A B. Spencer Kann: +- C. Stuart adermeLstein; + +\HS) D. any past or present , independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to he affiliated with Searcy Denney. including without limitation John (luck) Scurola: and + +E. any other atom disclosed to you that they represent Or represented in the post clients who had claims against Epstein. + +10. Any and all Documents reflecting or memorializing communications for any purpose other than writing a book. whether such communications be oral or written; between you and uny of the following pswurna regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past ur settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims in any way involving or alleged to involve Epstein, including investments in actual ur purisonisd settlements of claims involving or alleged to involve Epstein: + +- ti A.J. Dist:aim and +- D. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, inclUding, without thrum who invested in Razorback PundIng. LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. 11 . Any mid all Documents that you received for any purpose other dine writing a book from any of the persons (including low firma) identified in items ittt 7-10 above. + +12. Any and all Documents that you sent. delivered or transmitted for uny [surprise other than writing a book to any of the persons (including law firms) identified in items MM 7-1() above. + +13. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing the substance of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or material. about Epstein you obtained from, any person purporting to he affiliated with ERA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cartes against Epstein, for the purpose of writing u boeik.,gt + +14. Any and all Documents relating to, reflecting or memorializing tre allibstanta of interviews about Epstein you conducted with, or research, information or inatetiala Epstein yu a obtained from, any person purporting to be affiliated with RICA or repnesenttng Iwo to have knowledge of RRA's cases against Epstein, for any purpose rather than wrung a book. + +es9 + +305 + +NOTA CERT + +![](_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36cfb80ae2edf29a263a73d750003c17d3966842 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/EFTA02769777.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1216 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 23, + "chars": 39300, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.8, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.166, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 398.9372253417969, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 398.9372253417969, + 43.39093017578125 + ], + [ + 205.166, + 43.39093017578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Service:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 46.739, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 277.7301940917969, + 387.98999999999995 + ], + [ + 277.7301940917969, + 400.84259033203125 + ], + [ + 46.739, + 400.84259033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSQ'ION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.746, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 437.64337158203125, + 271.35 + ], + [ + 437.64337158203125, + 286.8630676269531 + ], + [ + 168.746, + 286.8630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "See Attached Schedule \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.446, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 376.2784729003906, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 376.2784729003906, + 465.363037109375 + ], + [ + 229.446, + 465.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.3780212402344, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 347.3780212402344, + 98.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.97499999999997, + 98.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Definitions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.294, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 337.23773193359375, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 337.23773193359375, + 126.363037109375 + ], + [ + 268.294, + 126.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Documents Requested", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 382.40999999999997, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 382.40999999999997, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 256.76099999999997, + 405.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 1 RE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.78999999999996, + 116.774658203125 + ], + [ + 514.0569458007812, + 116.774658203125 + ], + [ + 514.0569458007812, + 154.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 281.78999999999996, + 154.97406005859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TEClUM FOR DEPOSIT!", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.62, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 418.13999999999993, + 283.5 + ], + [ + 418.13999999999993, + 299.70000000000005 + ], + [ + 163.62, + 299.70000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUIEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.48999999999998, + 114.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 335.1785888671875, + 114.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 335.1785888671875, + 127.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 251.48999999999998, + 127.7005615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Definitions", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.974, + 140.78167724609375 + ], + [ + 322.998, + 140.78167724609375 + ], + [ + 322.998, + 153.570556640625 + ], + [ + 259.974, + 153.570556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "11. Documents Requested", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 247.85399999999998, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 367.2616271972656, + 390.41999999999996 + ], + [ + 367.2616271972656, + 405.0890808105469 + ], + [ + 247.85399999999998, + 405.0890808105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 286.032, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 519.342, + 162.81 + ], + [ + 286.032, + 162.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.65, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 419.95799999999997, + 284.31 + ], + [ + 419.95799999999997, + 298.08 + ], + [ + 166.65, + 298.08 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 339.12603759765625, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 339.12603759765625, + 136.84259033203125 + ], + [ + 254.93999999999997, + 136.84259033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "f. Pefinitiota", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.652, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 327.78, + 147.42000000000002 + ], + [ + 327.78, + 161.96258544921875 + ], + [ + 264.652, + 161.96258544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Documents Requested", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 386.37 + ], + [ + 369.056, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 249.47699999999995, + 398.52 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 25 + ], + [ + "Line", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "Line", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769777" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0c85b4ac1bb1d0d3887c488e5a49b7ba3df324a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769777/_page_22_Picture_30.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e0b60c9b2220a550c10aedb77dab045d356645127907f56dc25bcb4172891097 +size 41926 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e63eb5e995ef1994a2a9ff93698201e5e040ed6e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.md @@ -0,0 +1,558 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF FILING** + +COMES NOW the Defendant/CounterClaimant, BRADLEY EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files the attached transcript of the telephone interview of [REDACTED] to supplement the proffer made in support of Counter-Claimant's Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Punitive Damages. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this 17 day of May 2011. + +![]()\_\_\_\_\_ +Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: [REDACTED] +Fax: [REDACTED] +Attorney for Defendant/CounterClaimant +Edwards + +2011MAY17 PH 4:00 + +FILED + +NOT ACCERTIFIED COPY + +Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Notice of Filing Supplement + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger. Esquire + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 + +Phone: + +Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL + +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 + +Phone: + +Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jose h L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire + +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach FL 3 -6170 + +Phone: + +Fax: Attorneys for Jefhre pstein + +Marc S. N + +Law O t.. s of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Phone: + +Fax: Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Martin Weinberg, Esquire Martin Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, MA 02116 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein\_ + +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Filing Supplement + +NOTA CERTIFIED COPY + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT + +TELECON + +PARTICIPANTS: JACK SCAROLA BRAD EDWARDS + +RE: Edwards adv. Epstein 291874 + +DATE: April 07, 2011 + +JS: M , Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards + +BE: HIM. \' + +V: Hi Jack! Hi Brad! How you guys doing? + +JS: We're doing fine, thank you. I'm strrNr 4\II of the trouble and before we go any further, let me tell you, if I have our wrinission, I have started a tape recorder and I want to be able to tape this co iotrfrom the very beginning. Is that alright with you? + +V: Sure, that's fine, Jack. + +JS: Ok, good, thank you. I appreciate that. Let me start off by introducing myself. I know that Brad has spoken to you about me but I am Brad's lawyer, and I assume that you can confirm thaliyou and I have never had any communication before. Is that right? + +V: That' + +JS: Cl eave, however, gotten some information from Brad about conversations that y ave had with him, and that will enable me, hopefully, to make this a little bit more efficient and take up a minimum amount of your time while still getting the information that we think is going to be helpful to us and to any jury that might ultimately have to hear these facts. + +V: That's my maiden name. My married name is + +So, let me begin by asking you first to tell us what your full name is. + +JS: Could you spell your last name for us? That is your married last name: + +V: + +JS: Alright, thank you, and where are you living right now? + +V: I live in Australia. + +JS: And how long have you resided in Australia. + +V: This is my 19th year. + +,0 + +N JS: That is where you are right now, correct? We've reached yo n 0 is for this phone conversation? + +V: That is correct, yes. + +JS: And what time is it in Australia right now? 'C,) + +V: I think it's about 9:00 now. + +JS: Ok. That's 9am, correct? + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Alright. the re n 's conversation is because it is our understanding that you know a man y the e y Epstein, and I want to begin by asking you please to tell us about the circums of your first meeting Mr. Epstein. + +V: Ok. I was i trodu o Mr. Epstein by Ghislaine Maxwell. I was working at Donald Trump's m M -a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansio • Beach that afternoon after work to make some extra money and to learn about :e. She met me at the spa, and I was reading a book about anatomy, so I was ted in massage therapy as it was and not having any of the education or w anything behind me, I thought this was a great opportunity to work for her and go. o, I went to Jeffrey's mansion about 5 or 6 in the afternoon. My dad drove me there. My dad worked at Mar-a-Lago with me, and he met Ghislaine and she seemed like a nice, proper English lady, and she knows, I mean, you know, one time then \_once before I left to travel overseas, she just seemed really nice and like she would like to help me out. So my dad left, and I had no problem getting home that night, one of her drivers would take me back after my trial. So she led me upstairs, and into Jeffrey's bedroom, and past that is Jeffrey's massage room, which has got his steam room and a shower and a massage table, and there is actually an extra room that has, that nobody knows about it, it's kinds like a secret room and it's got a whole bunch of decorative pictures of pornographic literature and sex toys and I can ? what happened in there. + +JS: When you say that the room was hidden, [REDACTED], how was the room concealed? + +V: It wasn't like a door that you would normally go into, like some kind of special opening, you open that and then a little door, so it looks like it's a little closet so-to-speak, but when you walk in there, it's obviously a lot bigger than just a closet. It wasn't too big, but it was bigger, you know. It wasn't a gigantic room, it was just like a small room, which you know, it probably could fit some shoes in there, \_ it had racks of shoes, boxes, some sweatshirts neatly folded, and the ceiling to the floor was covered in pornographic pictures of the girls that he had met. + +JS: When you say... + +V: So anyways, that was getting there, and I was introduced to Jeffrey, he was laying naked on top of the massage table, and obviously for one, I'm a 15 year old girl and seeing him on the table was weird but, also learning about anatomy and massage, I thought this would be part of it. So obviously, I thought it was part of the massage program, so I said ok, this is fine. And, he then instructed me on how to touch the body, Jeffrey's body, how to massage him, and for the first hour, it was actually a real massage, maybe not an hour, maybe like 40 minutes or something, but of something like that \_ and that's when he turned over on the other side and to expose himself fully. So then Ghislaine told me that she wanted me to undress and began to take off my shirt and skirt, my white uniform from Mar-A-Lago, she also took off her shirt and got undressed, and so I was there with just my undies on, and she was completely bare, and made some kind of little flake about the underwear that I was wearing because it wasn't my normal sexy girl underwear and just like, I don't know, had red hearts on it or something like that; just your normal, you know, real cute underwear. Anyways, so during all of this I'm kind of like what's going on, how do I act, what do I say, I was so afraid of, not afraid or fearful for my life but \_ unsure of how all this started and wanting to obtain a profession \_ I was so afraid thinking about upsetting and disappointing them, I don't know, it's a weird situation by far and I was expected to \_ Lick his nipples, instructed on how to do so by J.E \_ and give him oral sex while he wanted to fondle me, and then at the end, I was told by Ghislaine to get on top and straddle Jeffrey sexually, and when we were done, we went and had a shower in the room and Jeffrey told me to wash him up and down, you know with a bar of soap and make sure he was all cleaned up. And then he took me downstairs and took me to two of the guards and told John to bring me home. John was the [REDACTED] at the time. + +JS: Let me interrupt you for just a moment there if I could, [REDACTED]. You mentioned as you were recounting those details that you were 15 years old at the time. What is your date of birth? + +V: [REDACTED] + +JS: And can you tell us please, as best you're able to estimate it, what the date was when this first encounter occurred? + +V: I've got it written down. It's like - I'm not good with math — hold on — I thought I wrote it down but I didn't. I'm not too sure, I think it was 1998 off the top of my head and around June of 1998, I would say as I was turning 16 at the end of the summer. JS: Alright. You talked about the room where Jeffrey had the pornographic photographs. Did you actually see that room on the occasion of your first visit there? V: No, I got to see that room a few visits after but I was just trying to d room to you guys so you knew exactly what room I was talking about. JS: Another question for you, and I don't mean to be prying into yo life, and if I ask you any questions at all that you're uncomfortable answ you just tell me that and we'll move on, because I appreciate your cooperati e last I thing I want to do is impose upon that cooperation, but can you tell t generally what kind of sexual experience you had had prior to this confro lion 'th Jeffrey? V: Yeah, sure. A close family friend has sexually e, and I was on the streets at 13 years old. I was picked up by a 67 year old Ron \_Eppinger\_ who did exactly what Jeffrey did with me abuse and viol y thfulness \_ & I was with him for 6 months. So, he was gone and then I s yfriend who was like my school friend from young days but we just kept with each other and we were on and off constantly, and that was Tony F' ua and there was also another younger guy was near my age, Michael, I can' r his last name, but yeah, there, I mean, there wasn't like a string of men g, but there was Ron, like I told you, and he was the first guy expecting me led disgusting affairs. Jeffrey actually knew Ron, which was quite weird old Jeffrey the story about Ron, and Jeffrey had actually met him, and yeah. An , just another story, and yeah, there were a couple of men, but that gives you JS: Now whe ou desLrribed the photographs in the room as pornographic, tell me just a little b' e photographs, if you would please? First, how many of them were there V: 100, and like I said, they covered the room from the ceiling, not the ceiling but the top of the edge of the wall to the bottom of the floor. I want to say at least a hundred, even more, there could have been more in the boxes \_Some of them were A4\_ photographs, like the large size, some of naked women posing, you know, positions, sexy positions. Others were, you know, some girls had bikinis on, and it wasn't so pornographic, but it was all women, and it was all in a sexual nature. JS: Were there photographs where more than one person appeared? V: yeah, plenty of them. There were lots of naked photographs, I mean I was just trying to give you a visual range. There was anything from 5x6s to 4x8s to 8x4s. Some of them + +had frames, some of them were out of frames, but they were all, like I said, they were all women, they were all sexual in nature. + +JS: Was it your impression that there were a hundred photos of a hundred different people or were there multiple photos of the same woman or girl? V: There was definitely a lot of different girls. I mean it wasn't easy to sit there and say, you weren't finding 5 girls out of some photos, no. Were there a hundred di erent ones? There could have been pictures of some girls, I really couldn't get do ssarily to actually recognize faces or anything like that. But if you, you know,,fi ran of them were all different, majority of them were different, yeah. JS: Did there ever come a point in time when you became aw had been added to the collection? V: Ohotograph of you Yes, there was. Ghislaine took several nude photogfap f me for Jeffrey. So, yeah, there were pictures of me and there were picture,' he w 't shy, that wasn't the only place in his house that he kept the photos. H, liked photos all over his house. If you looked in his den or on his desk or in on hall table, a giant hall table in his house, there were at least a hundred photos of ranies. Not all of them were naked, a lot of the ones that were all around his h e of naked girls posing pornographically, some were pictures of celebrities an litic he had known\_or things like that or had pants on or whatever, but yeah, t lot of mixed photographs in the outside ones. JS: Were there any photogra f s or young women that you knew or that you subsequently came to saw in the house? V: eah there was. re was pictures of pictures pie pictures of me, pictures of the regulars, but a lot of the girls, someti es J could have like 7 girls a day, and he would only see those girls once if he bo . I don't know. These weren't my days. I heard he's gotten a lot sloppie ft. So, I don't know anyways, but when I knew him, there was just a, it seem e as such an influx of girls coming in and out, so did I recognize a lot of th be, maybe not, but then they were all definitely beautiful, they were all in age, some of them young, some of them older in their 20's, I mean it was just th were all beautiful. JS: You've told us about the first visit. Was there any discussion on the occasion of that first visit about your returning? V: Yes, they were very pleased with me and after the encounter was finished, the sexual encounter, he went and told me I did well and I have a lot of potential to become a massage therapist and if I'd like I could return tomorrow, you know, and do the same thing and get paid \$200/hr, so Jeffrey insisted that I come after work, and over the next few days, I guess the relationship grew into more, and within a couple of weeks, not even + +a couple of weeks, maybe a week, 1 had quit Mar-a-Lago and I was working for Jeffrey full time. + +JS: V: JS: V: JS: V: JS: V: Ok, let's talk about your job at Mar-a-Lago, if we could. You said that your Dad was working there. What was his position at Mar-a-Lago? He was a maintenance supervisor I think is what it was tennis courts and air conditioners and things like that. What is your Dad's full name? IMr And is he still living here in South Florida now? No, he's not, he's in California. Ok. Is your Dad aware of what is currently gsn si public statements about your relationship wi Je e Yes, he is well aware of it. I told my they were the first ones contacted they the Mail on Sunday printed photos said that I was angry why I came out and went how they are still up to didn't contact the Mail going to bring it out everything from called? He like managed the 1 th regard to your having made n before all this stuff came out, because jo Isis from Mail on Sunday. I know that one out and tried to, I mean I think one of the ffrey and the Prince walking together and that is everything. Not true. I mean, I am angry about ys together and that they're still hanging out but I ay and I didn't bring it out. I figured that everyone was y and I better bring it out the right way. He's known and my family is very supportive with everything going on. JS: I'm kind omg to jump around a little bit and I apologize for that, but since the subject has co p, me first of all why you are providing this cooperation to us, and lam certai ppreciative of it, but I want you to tell us why it is you've chosen to spend t on the telephone and provide this information that you're now providing. V: l' t to help the bigger picture, you know, I think all of us can make a big difference in a lo of other people's lives and I think that this has gone on long enough and it's a big slap in my face that he can get away with hurting me so bad let alone so many other girls and laugh about it. I guess I talked to you guys out because I want to see the right thing happen, not just to him, but I want people in the world to understand this is not the way of life, you know, it's not acceptable to go out procure young girls and make them think that, this is the way you should be living and that's all. Yeah, I guess my reason for doing it is to help the bigger picture, you know, I'm a big believer in karma and I believe that good things will come back to you, so I guess that's why I'm doing this. + +JS: Just for the record, neither Brad, nor I, nor anyone representing that they have anything to do with us has made any promises to you. Is that correct? + +V: That is correct. I'll tell you, since this is our first conversation, that nobody has made me feel like I've been bribed or bought or had to say anything. I've told you anything that I know from my own self, not some things somebody told me. If anything, Brad's been extra careful not to tell me anything and let me do all the talking, so it's quite opposite I think. + +JS: Alright. Let's get back then to the story of your relationship with talked about your first encounter with him and how it evolved time employment with Jeffrey, but what were you doing at Mar Mar-a-Lago? d we've nto your full fore you quit + +V: I was just a locker room attendant and sometimes I ba ftting for the rich and famous. So, I wasn't anything big. I worked in the That's why I was studying anatomy, because I was really really interested in massage therapist\_, and at the locker room, I didn't do much. I mean I g tea for a living, I would, you know, make sure the toilet paper had a lift in it after everybody went to the toilet, or wipe down the water from the b u ow, it was a very easy peasy job. + +S JS: Did you get that job through your DO. + +V: Yes, my Dad got me the job. + +A JS: Ok, and you were only C .) Mar-a-Lago? at the time, were they aware of how old you were at + +V: Of course, defin' We had to go through extensive, you know, we even had to get drug tested d and so on and so forth. I mean, Mantas (?) is very strict on employrn eah, erybody knew. + +JS: Ok. re ever any conversation with Ghislaine about how old you were before you o Jeffrey's mansion? + +V: N She didn't ask me how old I was from the start, but when I did get to Jeffrey's mansion, it was discussed how old I was. + +JS: With whom? + +V: During the entire hour of what I call the legitimate massage I was giving him, it was cat and mouse games getting information from me to find out who I am, am I a willing participant in these kind of things, and how would I react if they were about to take the next step. But they got information off of me, they got my age, they got my, a little bit of my history so they knew I was, you know, not very stable at home, and they knew that, + +you know, I was actually interested in making my life better by studying so what they were offering me was a chance to become a legitimate masseuse but it was getting trained. They would have people show me how to work the body and be called a massage therapist and get me books on it, and you know, keep me interested, and every time, you know, I was with Jeffrey, literally was about massages, I don't mean just going in and have sex with him. I mean massage, because it would always start out with massage and then it would lead into sometimes other things. + +JS: Alright, once this evolved into full time employment, what did full tirr'evloyment mean? V: That was entirely having to travel with Jeffrey in every city. a il was in Palm Beach, I stayed at my apartment, and he would call me to his !louse once or twice a day sometimes, and that's, you know, do things with him. Sometimes we'd go out shopping, sometimes we'd go out and watch a movie. You know, simplebdiings like that, go to an expo or a fair, whatever it was. But when we were inother cities, I was at my apartment\_, I lived with him full time. What I mean by full time is even in the middle of the night, I could get a ring on my phone next to me and tell me to come in his room, you know, so it was literally full time. JS: When you say that when you were M Palm Beach you were living in your apartment, were you living on your own or w rtfiiving with members of your family at that time? V: No, after I quit Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey offered to get me an apartment in Palm Beach somewhere, Royal Pal Beae1 and it was a nice apartment. He furnished it for me, it was absolutely beautifit butiyeah, that's the only time I would spend time away from him really. JS: This apartment wa t IZ n IN. oyal Palm Beach Boulevard or out in the Village of Palm Beach? V: I so honestly don't remember. I've been trying to rack my brain because the FBI was asking the same thing and were trying to find it, but yeah, I'm Not sur\_. I didn't get to spend as much time in it, I was only there about an entire week out of every month probably, but the majority of the time I was with Jeffrey anyways. It was somewhere in Royal Palm Beach. I don't know about Royal Palm Beach drive. I don't even remember the Royal Palm Beach drive anymore so I'm not too sure. JS: Ok, let me see if I can draw the distinction for you and maybe that will help you to help us? Royal Palm Beach is a village that is... V: No, no, no, I got Royal Palm Beach, I just didn't know the Royal Palm Beach Drive, like what street it's off of. Were you talking about a street? + +JS: Yes, I was talking about a street. Royal Palm Drive is on the island of Palm Beach, and it's a street that is lined with large royal palm trees, and I'm wondering if this was an apartment on the island or was this an apartment out west of town... + +V: No, it was actually in Royal Palm Beach, not on the island. + +JS: Alright. + +V: I would be driven, it was closer to my family than it was closer to him. AI liv ted to be close enough to everybody else so that when I was in town, I coul,t go ee them quickly. + +JS: Ok. So we're not talking about Royal Palm Boulevard. We're talking about the town of Royal Palm west of town. Jeffrey got you an apartment out there. + +V: That's correct. + +JS: When he was in Palm Beach, you were general ying at the mansion, you were staying at the apartment that he got for you out west of town. + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Ok. + +V: I mean then there was times, I don't wanna say that every time I stayed at my apartment. There was times we'd fly back from some city maybe too late at night to really want to go back home, so you know, it's like 12:00 at night or 1:00 in the morning. I was just staying in the yellow room, or something like that; one of the guest rooms in Palm Beach. But majority of the-time, I would definitely want to get back to my own apartment. + +Y." JS: Alright. What were'the general hours of your full time employment when ...? + +V: There was Dot set hours. It wasn't like logging, and you know, hitting the shift button, nothing like that. The way I would get paid would be, ok, if I was in Palm Beach, I would get \$200 an hour to massage Jeffrey or some of his friends and then go home. So it would be like that. If I was traveling with him, it would be per massage, so I would be getting paid per day. So I wouldn't be getting paid on an hourly rate. He wouldn't say ok, today you're going to work for me from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 at night. It never like that. I was on call all the time. + +JS: When you were here in Palm Beach, were you actually getting paid only for the time spent massaging Jeffrey or were you getting paid from your arrival at his house until you left the house? + +V: From the time the massage started. + +JS: From the time the massage started. Ok. + +V: Sometimes we'd go there and I would wait for a while or talk with Ghislaine and Jeffrey about something or we'd meet somewhere and talk about something. A lot of times, I'd meet him upstairs in his room where he was ready for me. But then there was a lot of times where it didn't start right away, so he couldn't really pay me from the time I got there sometimes unless it was just paid from the time I massaged him til the time the massage was over. \_ + +JS: Alright. Did your duties for Jeffrey ever include anything other than providing him massages and sex in connection with the massages? Did he ever gilice you any other responsibilities to perform? + +V: I was asked to do the same things that I did to Jeffrey to a few of his fellow colleagues as well. Those were my duties. He looked at it this /way is that I was going to be a professional massage therapist, and maybe I needed some clientele, so he had me perform erotic massages on a few people. + +JS: Did that start here in Palm Beach County? ' + +V: It did. The first one did. + +JS: Ok, and how long after you ii Jeffrey did he first ask you to provide services for one of his friends? CY /"). + +V: About 9 months, I think it was. It wasn't a full year, it wasn't 6 months, but between 6 months and a year, which is why I'm saying 9 months. + +JS: And when you proVided services to a friend of Jeffrey's, who paid you for those services? + +V: Jeffrey would. I would get paid the next time I saw Jeffrey, so if I was invited to the Breakers Hotel to give a massage, I would give a massage, I would go home, and the next day when I saw Jeffrey, he would pay me for what I did. So, it was paid always by him, it was set up by him, so he always knew what to pay me. I did get tips and things like that, if you call it that, you know, like a hundred dollar tip or something from a few of them, you know, yeah. + +JS: Was there .. + +V: There was always payment from Jeffrey. + +JS: Was there ever any discussion with Jeffrey about what was expected to happen when you provided massage services to one of Jeffrey's friends? + +V: In a roundabout way, yes. In so many ways, Jeffrey really really had to train me, and that was why Ghislaine said that she and Jeffrey enjoyed me so much was because they never really had to speak much to me to tell me what they wanted me to do. You know, I wasn't waiting for you know, their directions. Jeffrey would tell me to go give an erotic massage to friends. He wouldn't give me much detail about it, but he would say to treat them like you treat me. JS: Did he refer to it as an erotic massage or are those your words? V: Erotic massage is my words. That's exactly what it was, but he wo Il rrTe to treat them how he wanted it, so I'd do what he wanted without havi to me words more. I mean, I complied with what he wanted because it was me t of a, I don't know, I don't know how to say it, it was just very mindbog rn let him have so much control or power over me basically. The massages wou be utine to what Jeffrey wanted with my so called new clientele, and with th o ords would ask me to provide them with sexual pleasure after the massage. JS: his friends? V: Of course, of course, and I knew because there were times where he and so had a great time, you did J.E how it went\_... Did you ever report back to Jeffrey about what \ a n hen you provided massages to ds were reporting back to him as well gate conversation by saying you know, so you know so and so gave me a call and told JS: Did Jeffrey ever elicit d ou? "Tell me what happened, describe in detail what went on?" V: No, but he would a laugh, he had a laugh with me a few times about some of their different m en s, guess you would say, like some of them, one guy had a foot fetish and t was ly weird and I mentioned it to Jeffrey, and we would have a laugh over it. a 't want to know details. He wasn't asking me "so tell me what did you guys o exact! ." No, he just basically gave me a slap on the back and said, you know, good job. And we had some kind of conversation about it. I can't recall any conversation off thasop of my head. I really don't know one. It's been that long. But yeah, we did ta119bout it briefly. IS: Can you give me an estimate as to the number of friends for whom Jeffrey provided and paid for your services? V: There was about, you know, I don't know, 8 guys possibly. JS: And are you able to name those people for me? + +V: No, not at this stage. I just, some of these people are really influential in power, and I don't want to start another shitstorm with a few of them. I'll tell you that there was some erotic massages given to, I'm just afraid to say it to you. + +JS: Ok, M. + +V: It's like geez, I don't know if I want to, I'm really scared of where this is gonna go. + +HI JS: Alright. I understand that, and as I told you from the beginning, if I askiyoul' a question that you are uncomfortable answering, you just tell me that, and I meove on, and I understand that at least right now, you are uncomfortable answering, -and I am certainly going to respect that. L i) + +V: Thank you so much, Jack. + +( .) + +JS: No, that's quite alright. I am very appreciate of the chimpieNr ion you are providing, and I don't want you at any time to feel that we are taking unfair advantage of that cooperation, so give me the information that you're comfortable giving me, and if we get to a point where you're uncomfortable, I will respect At t ict an4we'll move on from there. + +JS: I want to talk a little bit about t 4Cve iag that you did with Jeffrey. About how long into your relationship with him did t6t-first start? + +.(1 . V: Immediately. I started traveling, Immediately. Not internationally until I think about, Gosh, I can't remember even, I think it was a year later that we started doing international travel. Maybe like 9 montiatto a year again. Not too sure to be honest. + +JS: So that would haveh t 'eXapproximately the summer of 1999? Somewhere around there? + +V: Ok. + +V: Yes. Somewhere around there. Somewhere around a year, somewhere around there, I can't (pinpoint it exactly. But like I said, we started doing domestic traveling immediately, so my first destination with him was New York and Santa Fe and the -Carribean, California, I would take trips with him occasionally. Sometimes we would go to St. Louis or New Orleans or Santa Cruz. We were traveling just about everywhere I think. + +JS: I low did you travel? + +V: Well, we took Jeffrey's private jet, and unless I was being sent somewhere by myself for what we were just talking about before, then I would travel on a what do you call, a public jet, whatever it is... + +JS: commercial flight? + +V: Yes. Just a normal flight, an e-ticket. + +JS: Like the rest of us common folk. + +V: But when I was traveling with Jeffrey, the majority of the time would be on the black jet. + +JS: Now, when you say there would be times when you would travel by yoursel because he was sending you somewhere, tell me about that. How did that come about. + +V: So, one of his colleagues would be at the Carribean or Santa Fe or even New York, or wherever, and he would call me up on those days where I am not working with him or in Palm Beach with him, and he would ask me to get on the next plane\_to so and so and go meet so and so, and that's when I would take e-tickets. His secretary or special assistant, whatever, would organize it for me and give me the details and -f would just walk up the line and they'd let me right through. + +JS: Can you give me any ideas as to how many times it happened that Jeffrey would send you off to meet some friend of his at some location outside of Palm Beach? + +V: How many times it happened? I'm not too sure. Probably about 10-15 times. 1,2\ + +JS: Ok. And on those occasions, how, mub time would you spend with one of Jeffrey's friends when you were sent to a location that you would have to travel to? + +V: Only a couple of days. 9nly 2 ilays, that's it. + +JS: And how were you paid hose trips? + +V: I would be paid in pon my arrival back with Jeffrey. So, whenever I was back with Jeffrey, hettiuld count up how many days I've had, sometimes give me even more than what I deserved, not deserved, but what I earned and give me a little extra. + +JS: Was there a daily rate for those trips or was that per massage also? + +V: Per.massage. With Jeffrey, I would be honest. I wouldn't tell him I did 15 massages if I didn't. He knew he could trust me. He could always come back to the other person that he sent me to give massages and ask them as well, so you know, it was always by per massage. + +JS: Alright. When we've been talking about massages, tell me exactly what it is we're talking about when we speak about massages. + +V: Same thing I would do to Jeffrey. Again, it would start out as a massage, which would start with them being naked, and me giving him a legitimate massage to begin with, so + +I'd start with his feet, go up to his calves, up his legs, buttocks, back, his neck, his head, his arms, yada yada, and then it would be time to flip over, and some of the men would want me to continue on massaging the front side of them and they would instigate me to begin having sex with them or foreplay, whatever you want to call it. + +JS: So routinely, these massages involved sexual activity. Is that accurate? + +V: That is accurate. + +JS: Ok. Let's talk about the travel that you were involved in when you were on Jeffrey's private plane. Generally speaking, who were the passengers on the plane when you traveled. + +V: Well, Larry was the pilot, and then there was a short, small solid guy, I don't know his name, but he was a co-pilot, and then he changed and there was another guy brought in later on. Generally speaking, there was always Jeffrey, sometimes Ghislaine, sometimes [REDACTED], sometimes a whole bunch of other girls, sometimes famous people, sometimes some politicians or yeah, just about anybody could fly on his plane. There was never no any set routine who would come and who would go. It was an influx of people on Jeffrey's airplane. + +JS: I want to deal with these things separately in order to respect some of the reservations that you have, so I'm going to ask you who the people were that you remember flying with Jeffrey on his plane when you were personally present without regard to whether there was any sexual activity that occurred on the plane or not. So I'm not asking you to implicate any of these famous people in improper conduct, but just tell me what the names of the people are that you remember that you consider to be famous people. + +V: Ok, there was Naomi Campbell, Heidi Klum, there was Bill Clinton. There was Al (?) Gore, there was a whole bunch of models, I wouldn't really honestly be able to give their names. There was Matt Groning the producer of the simpons cartoon, Jack CCousteau's granddaughter a lot of interior designers, architects, politicians. I am just trying to think of as many names as possible for you. Off the top of my head, that's as good as I can get for now. + +JS: Ok, alright, that's fine. And again, I am not implying by my questions, nor do I want your answers to be interpreted as your suggesting that any of those people that you have just identified were engaged in any improper activities on any particular flight, but I want to talk to you now about what went on on occasion on the airplane. Ok? + +V: Ok. It was a lot of the same thing that went down on the ground. A lot of times, it would be just be me and Jeffrey, or me and Jeffrey and Ghislaine, or me and Jeffrey and some other girl, sometimes [REDACTED], Sarah, and [REDACTED]. There would be sexual conduct, there would be foreplay, there was a bed in there, so we could basically reenact exactly + +what was happening in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off with foreplay, sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies. + +JS: Were there occasions when you were in Jeffrey's company, whether on the ground or in the air, where there were other girls present whom you knew to be under age 18? + +V: Yes. There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we were all very young. On occasion, there was some older girls, and I don't mean older as i ike in their 30s or anything, I mean like 28, 29, something like that, just very rarely. ajority of the girls that Jeffrey actually met or had on his plane or in his house w der age. + +JS: Do you know how it is that Jeffrey established with any of these iris? + +V: Yes, I do. He would send me personally or with other girls t anywhere, I mean we were constantly on the look f pth Jeffrey. or shops, to \_pick up Is that might satisfy + +JS: What instructions were you given about what to + +V: Young, pretty, you know, a fun personality. They couldn't be black. If they were any other descent other than white, they ha to be exotically beautiful. That was just about it. + +JS: Who gave you those criteria? + +V: They both gave us the ins a friend and make extra looked a lot more safer doing it. That was the it wasn't just me, Jeffrey asked most girls to bring ey would use us young girls So that way it probably at we were procuring to younger girls that were already Jeffrey had it. + +JS: Were you given an tion at all on how to approach these girls? + +V: Yes. d Ghislaine both taught me to, depending on the circumstances, depe ing e girl, you could offer them a job as a massage therapist or you could tell the& ve a really rich friend with, you know, great contacts in the acting world or world and he loves pretty girls, you should come back and meet him, make so money, you know, we had a whole bunch of ways to be able to procure girls. + +JS: Can you give me any idea as to the total number of underage girls that you know engaged in sexual conduct with Jeffrey during the period of time you had your relationship with him? + +V: I would have no way of estimating that whatsoever. I mean, there could be a hundred, there could be more, honestly I'm not too sure how many girls, really. I wish I did know. I mean like I said there were so many over the course of 4 years with Jeffrey. + +JS: Let me see if we can try to narrow it down a little bit. Is there any doubt in your mind that it was more than 10? + +V: Yes, there was definitely more than 10. + +JS: Ok, what I want you to do is to give me the highest number that you are comfortable in saying there were definitely more than X number of underage girls that I know Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sex with while I had a relationship with him. How would you fill in that blank? Definitely more than how many? + +V: I'd say definitely more than a hundred. + +JS: Alright. Did Jeffrey ever help to pick out your clothes? + +V: yes. I mean he wasn't out to dress me like a porn star or anything. He would always ress me very classy, but we'd just go shopping all the time together. + +JS: Did he ever express any style preferences in, terms of how he wanted you to dress? Besides dressing classy, I'm, you know, any other suggestion to you about how he wanted you dressed? + +V: He didn't, like I said, wasn't trying,to\dreinne in any prostitute way or anything like that. It was nice, classy outfits I was ating like Gucci, Dolce Gabbana, Chanel, things like that. He was buying me alMolvery, very nice clothing. It was provocative. I mean I was wearing miniskirts, ancitight short shorts and little shirts that showed my belly and my cleavage and everything, butthey were very expensive clothes. + +JS: Was there every any drestsamirole playing? + +V: Yes. There was. ,Ots7of it. Jeffrey loved the latex outfits Ghislane had for us girls, he had bondage outfits, he had all different kinds of outfits, but his favorite was the schoolgirl. + +JS: Teffme aboin that. + +V: We1J, you know, Ghislaine would take me to dress me up to surprise J.E or Jeffrey would ask me to get dressed up, that would include wearing a tiny little skirt with nothing underneath, a white collared shirt that you would be wearing to school with a tie in it, tied up \_in a bow\_, my hair in pigtails, stockings on up to my knees, and I would go in there and act like a kid and we'd do role playing sexing. + +JS: Did Jeffrey ever brag to you about the age of any of the girls with whom he had relationships? + +V: Yes, he did. lie did all the time. The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift from one of his friends and they were from France. 1 did see them, I did meet them. Jeffrey bragged afterwards after he met them that they were 12 year olds and flown over from France because they're really poor over there, and their parents needed the money or whatever the case is and they were absolutely free to stay and flew out. Those were the worst ones. He was constantly bragging about girls' ages or where he got them from or their past and how terrible their past was and good he is making it for them, + +JS: Where were the 12 year old girls flown to from France? Where did they come to? + +V: Palm Beach. + +JS: And were they flown in on Jeff's private plane or did they get transported? + +V: No. They were transported by somebody else. + +JS: Ok. Was the sexual activity that went on on the aitvlane conducted in such a way so that any of the crew was aware of what was going on? + +V: They were told to knock if they had toecorne out, if the crew had to come out. They were told, you know, to come out as little`as poasible, so they weren't out there hanging out watching everything, no, but it doesn't take an idiot to put two and two together to say well there's a whole bunch of half dressed teenagers on board with this old man who is constantly being massaged'6y them and he wants me to keep the door shut for what reason? I mean, only they could put that together, but yeah, they knew. + +JS: Did Mr. Epstein ever talk to you about people of power and influence owing him favors? + +V: He would laugh about it, you know, I never really knew what to take serious from Jeffrey because he4s such a funny character at times. You never knew if what he was saying was true-or not. Yeah, lots of people owed him favors from what he told me. He's got everybody in his pocket, and he would laugh about he helps people for the sole purpose in the end they owe him something. That's why I believe he does so many favors in the -first place. + +JS: When and how did you first become aware that Mr. Epstein was in trouble with the law? + +V: I was first informed by, I think someone from the FBI called me first and started to ask me questions, and I started to answer the questions but then fear took over, and I just said look, I don't know what's going on, I've got a young family that I don't want to risk, you know, please don't bother me about this again, and it was real short simple conversation, and within a week or 2, I had gotten a call from Jeffrey's attorney, and then a week later, Jeffrey himself. + +JS: Ok, well let's back up before we get to those conversations and tell me approximately when it was that you were contacted by the person who you believe was with the FBI. + +V: Ok. It's hard for me to pinpoint, if I had to pinpoint it, it would be in 2007 sometime. + +JS: Alright. And you were living in Australia at that time, correct? + +V: Correct. + +JS: You were contacted by telephone? + +V: That's correct, by my cell phone. + +JS: Ok and do you have any idea how your name came up leading,to that contact. + +hat some girls had revealed o contact me. V: No idea. No idea whatsoever. When I did ask, 1 w my name, I guess, and that's how everybody, the + +JS: OK. + +V: But I don't know offhand or sorry, I just walked into the wrong room. + +JS: Ok. + +V: Sorry go on. + +JS: Yes & I'll never tell her you said that. M, how long was it after that phone call from the FBI person were you contacted by Mr. Epstein's lawyers. + +V: Like a week. It warback to back to each other. I remember being so scared after talking to the FBI,thinking what's happening, what's going on. It's been like 6 years, 7 years at that stage, how did they find me & what do I have to do with this? So yeah, I do remember that very well, and it was only about a week later I was called by his attorney. + +JS: Who vas it that contacted you, do you remember? + +V: I want to say Bill Riley, but he might have been from the FBI. No, it was Bill Riley. Bill Riley. Not sure if that's his correct name, but that's what is coming to mind + +JS: What do you remember about that conversation? + +V: I remember a Mr. Goldberger as well, I remember, there might have been two of them. + +JS: Alright. + +V: I can't remember which one it was. I want to say Bill Riley is the good one. + +JS: Alright, so either Bill Riley or a Mr. Goldberger or both of them contacted you, and what do you remember about that? + +V: I don't know if it was the same guy who contacted me that week later who put me in touch with Jeffrey. I think he was on the phone and he put speakerphone on with Jeffrey. So he connected me with Jeffrey. I don't know if it was the same guy or different, but I definitely know that Bill Riley was the first guy to contact me. I'm pretty sure about that. + +JS: Ok. Tell me about that conversation. + +V: He asked me what I knew about what's going on with Jeffrey and apparently, there was an investigation being held about some of the girls who had come out and said that Jeffrey had sexual contact with them under the age of a minor and that he was discrediting lot of these girls and making them out to be drug addicts and prostitutes and what have you so they wouldn't be looked upon as worthy in the court's eyes so to speak. And you know, he told me in the first five minutes that, you know, if I stay quiet, that "I'll be looked after". And that was the exact way it was said. It wasn't like you know, I'm gonna pay you a zillion dollars or anything if you be quiet, but if I stay quiet, I would "looked after". And I remember saying I don't want any part to do with this. You know, this is not something I want to be a part of, I've got a young family. I wish the best for everybody in this, you know, take care kind of thing. A week later, I was called after the hearing by one of Jeffrey's lawyers. I can't tell you exactly which one it was but he had Jeffrey on the other line and he connected Jeffrey and I, and Jeffrey tried to make some simple conversation, "How are you? How have things been?" You know what I mean, catching up. + +JS: Do you know if the lawyer, did the lawyer stay on the line while Jeffrey was speaking to you? + +V: I'm pretty sure he did. That's why I think Jeffrey was on speaker phone because it sounded a lot different, and I was never taken off the line to begin with or connected to another line, so I was pretty sure Jeffrey was on speaker phone and the lawyer was making the call. After the simple conversation, it led to what was going on again and you know, Jeffrey couldn't believe it. You know, he thought he helped all these girls out. He didn't think he was wrong in any circumstance here at all. A lot of these girls were drug addicts and just after drug money. You know, he was really putting down these women or these girls I should say, not giving them the credit they deserved, and then he exactly repeated what the lawyer said the week before is that he would look after me if I stayed quiet, and if I need any help, you know, his lawyers would represent me and he would get legal help for me, whatever I need, he would do, and I told him exactly, I said, "Jeffrey, I'm the mother of two children at that stage. I'm away from everything there, I don't want to be a part of it. I'm not going to speak to anybody and I don't want to speak to anybody, I don't want to be involved." That was the last time I heard from him. And the + +next thing I knew, I was sent my victim's letter, my notification of being a victim through the US Attorney's Office and that's when I knew it was well out there enough not to have Jeffrey's lawyers come back on me and discredit me in the same way he had done to all the other girls. So, I called up Joseph Bird who was the recommended lawyers on my paperwork that they had given me and started going from there. + +JS: So you contact Mr. [REDACTED] Bergs' office and then you were dealing with his office from that point forward. + +V: That's correct. + +JS: Tell me about the ending of your relationship with Jeffrey. That is, at what point in time did your full time employment end and how did that happen? + +V: Ok. So, it hadn't really ended. I walked away from it all. Jeffrey sent me to Thailand where I met my husband and escaped to Australia, never to return back to the states. About 6 months prior to that, he came up with a proposition that I thought was really disgustingly sick. And it really showed me for the first time in 4 years I had been with him that nothing was going to change and I was always just going to be used by him(?) which I did not like. He offered me a mansion and some of his money every month, I forget what he called it, a monthly income of what he made to bear one of his children. The proposition was that if anything ever happened between Jeffrey and I, that I would have to sign my child over to him basically and that the child would be his and Ghislaine's, and I would be looking after it as long as nothing happened between Jeffrey and I. So, I was kind of freaked out by all of that. I pushed Jeffrey more to please get me some more training, you know, and I was getting older and not of as much interest to Jeffrey anyways. I was 19 now, and he likes a female a lot younger. So he sent me to Thailand, in September 2002. I was first supposed to meet a girl there and bring her back with me, but I never met up with her. I proceeded get a short course in Thai massage so that was to shut me up about my training so I went there, and one of my friends from school invited me to watch a fight, like a muay thai fight, which is like a form kickboxing. So I went and watched it, and I saw this guy that was a really good fighter, and a girl's word, looked really hot, so I asked my friend who knew him to introduce me. We got introduced and fell in love immediately, 3 days later Rob proposed and 7 days later I was being married in a buddist temple. I called Jeffrey and told him I'm sorry, I'm never coming back. I've gotten married, I've fallen in love. I thought he'd wish the best for me but he was kind of rude and he just said "have a good life" and hung up the phone, and that was the last time I'd talked to him ever until all this started again. + +JS: Ok. [REDACTED] is there anything else that you would like to add to what you have told us up to this point in time? + +V: I'd like to know that this time around something's going to be done about it and that Jeffrey and a lot of his colleagues, no matter how rich they are, will know that there is + +law and that there is people that still believe in it. So that's it. Thank you guys for listening to me, hearing me out and helping me. It's kind of hard to get through. + +JS: Thank you very much. Yes, I'm sure it has been very difficult and I am very appreciative of the courage you have shown in doing what you have done, which really brings me to the last subject, and that is what was it that motivated you to go public with all of this? + +V: Sharon Richard contacted me. I like her, I do, I like her a lot. I know she's a journalist, and journalists are normally bloodsucking leeches, but I like her for that, but she is an honest bloodsucking leech. She told me a lot about what was still going on, and she showed me a picture of Jeffrey with a little girl who looks like she could have been 12 years old. I mean it was disgusting. I agreed to talk with her, I never agreed to do anything until she showed me some pictures, and at that stage, being a mother of 3 children and having a daughter who I would do anything for to protect, I would put my neck on the line to make sure she never has to go through what I had to go through, and knowing all of this, and knowing that he's still out there doing the same exact thing with no regrets, no remorse, no worry about what he's doing to those girls, and all those girls feeling the same way that I did, so I, you know, I'm doing it because I believe in my heart of hearts it's the right thing to do. It's what I would want somebody to do for my daughter or my sister or my friend, and it saddens me to know that it's still going on right now. It's like the seashell story. I don't know if you're heard the story about the little kid who throws back a starfish, you know, the little brother tries to ask his sister, "why do you throw them in, they're all gonna die anyways, the little girl says "well, it's this one that I can help, and this one that I can help," and that's what I feel like I'm doing. I'm making a small dent in this big world we live in. + +JS: I certainly appreciate that courage, and I have heard that story, and you're absolutely right, that one person may not be able to make a difference for everyone, but one person can make a difference for someone, and hopefully, you are making a difference for someone, and we're gonna do the best we can to make sure you are making a difference for as many people as possible. + +V: Thanks Jack. + +JS: Just a few other follow up things I want to ask you and again, if any of these questions are questions that you're uncomfortable in responding to, then don't hesitate to tell me that. Do you have any recollection of Jeffrey Epstein's specifically telling you that "Bill Clinton owes me favors"? + +V: Yes. I do. It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what's Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor. He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn't know if he was serious. It was just a joke. + +JS: Where was here? + +V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They're all in each other's pockets. + +JS: When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here? + +V: On the island. + +JS: When you were present with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on the island jp else was there? + +V: Ghislaine, and there was 2 young girls that I could identi 'Zr really knew them well anyways. It was just 2 girls from New York. + +JS: And were all of you staying at Jeffrey's house on the isl inc ng Bill Clinton? + +V: That's correct. He had about 4 or 5 different vill land separate from the main house, and we all stayed in the villas. + +JS: Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence o \ I at Jeffrey's house? + +V: Yes. + +JS: If we were to take sworn testi "-from the people I am going to name, and if those people were to tell the trud about what they knew, do you believe that any of the following people would have relevant information about Jeffrey's taking advantage of underage girls? So I'll just name a name, and you tell me yes if they told the truth, I think they'd have relevant information or no, I don't think they would, or I don't know whether they would er pot. Ok? You understand? 7 + +V: Yes. + +JS: Ok. Les Wexner. + +V: I thi t be has relevant information, but I don't think he'll tell you the truth. + +JS: Ok. Alan Dershowitz. + +V: Yes. + +JS: David Copperfield. + +V: Don't know. + +JS: Tommy Matola. + +V: Don't know. + +JS: Prince Andrew. + +V: Yes, he would know a lot of the truth. Again, I don't know how much he would be able to help you with, but seeing he's in a lot of trouble himself these days, I think he might, so I think he may be valuable. I'm not too sure of him. + +IS: Ok. I think that's all I have for you. Let me tell you what uld e to do. As I to you in the beginning of this conversation, we've Sing it, and hopefully, we've got a clear enough recording so that we've everything accurately and when it's transcribed, it will be clear and acct hat I would like to do is transcribe it, send it to you, have you take a look at there's anything that we got wrong in the statement, you can write back ag you make changes in the transcript so that the transcript is accurate. Is that fai + +V: No worries. That is fair. No problem. + +a JS: Alright, great. I really do appreciate \ C c/e what the best way is to send the transcript to you. + +V: Email. If you just want to send i (emS or if you want to send it by mail, either or. + +JS: Ok. Give me your email a i u would please. + +V: + +JS: Let me read that to ou: + +V: Yep that's) + +BE: yo enfis, appreciate it. + +V: em, Brad. + +IS: Thank you very very much. Bye Bye now. + +V: Take care Jack. Nice meeting you. + +JS: You too. + +\*Redaction has been made at the request of the witness. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2538e70572c99c33b8c8fe01a09fe128861b4c8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800/EFTA02769800.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,999 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769800.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 27, + "chars": 56148, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.42400000000004, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 541.764, + 102.87 + ], + [ + 541.764, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 305.42400000000004, + 144.99 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.40000000000003, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 359.964, + 337.77 + ], + [ + 359.964, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 242.40000000000003, + 352.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 349.6656494140625, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 349.6656494140625, + 135.05352783203125 + ], + [ + 256.94399999999996, + 135.05352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 112.71600000000001, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 496.8699645996094, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 496.8699645996094, + 88.10302734375 + ], + [ + 112.71600000000001, + 88.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 115 + ], + [ + "Line", + 58 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769800" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b12c40aca47c2f67475026828143ddbbfaaf1196 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +2011 MAY 17 PM 4:00 +FLORIDA BOOK CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT DIVISION + +FILED + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the hearing scheduled for May 19, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. on Defendant/Counter Plaintiff, ██████████ Motion to Dismiss is hereby canceled and will be rescheduled by the Court at a later date. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this \_\_\_\_\_ day of May, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, +P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXYJCMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fistos & Lehrman, PL + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 3 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-997 Attorneys for Jefl pstem + +Marc S. N marc@n Law One E Bro ~!eam Marc S. Nurik d Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +sA Co + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +Weinberg, Esquire + +Weinberg, P.C. + +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 + +Suffolk, 02116 + +Phone: + +Fax: + +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +cdc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a3b8d5a70db8db790426f26a90694eb03824bc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827/EFTA02769827.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769827.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2056, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.327, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 306.327, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.219, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 428.12699999999995, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 428.12699999999995, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 177.219, + 336.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.998, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 146.238037109375 + ], + [ + 256.998, + 146.238037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769827" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d2f2770a97eaff320632bc6dc79e7baf1889691 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. C + +## NOTICE OF PROPOUND G INTERROGA ORY TO DEFENDANT + +r C - + +Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby provides noti uant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that one (1) Interrogat een directed to Defendant, this a day of May, 2011. + +It is requested that the aforesa4Q j be served within thirty (30) days at the offices of Burnett, Tower. 777 South Flagler Drive, Suite 901, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. + +ricS + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by + +U.S. Mail this ay of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue So Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33\*12 + +CO + +Respectit\ttu itted, + +A\P" + +r + +1 + +SI. Ackerman, Jr. + +ar No. 235954 + +C mail: + +\?\* BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South lagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +0 + +W.J30743'NOTOSI79,Nol of Iniarogatery to DA M1LA.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55fa59a5d6c8bc427e0007130a3bffc7ee1242f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830/EFTA02769830.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769830.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1423, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.575, + 55.342000000000006 + ], + [ + 452.58001708984375, + 55.342000000000006 + ], + [ + 452.58001708984375, + 85.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 136.575, + 85.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF PROPOUND G INTERROGA ORY \nTO DEFENDANT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.964, + 309.75 + ], + [ + 429.37890625, + 309.75 + ], + [ + 429.37890625, + 337.54998779296875 + ], + [ + 152.964, + 337.54998779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769830" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32cd270eb33061b465a0164e13cec5b0ab7276c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACE COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, V. + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA04C800)COCXMBAG Judge David F. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN. individually and J. ME, individually, + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN'S RESPOANO DEFENDANT REOUE T TO PRODUCE + +04 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Proced served on April 15, 2011 and states as fol ugh his undersigned counsel and is his Response to Request to Produce + +ll • + +la. Plaintiff does not have ents between Plaintiff or his agents and William Scherer or any person associatet William Scherer relating to any allegation of illegal activity or tortious conduc tr. Inch e Epstein is alleged to Ilave engaged; + +lb. Plaintiff/objects o the request for documents by and between the Plaintiff or his 4 agents and any prosecuting agency, law enforcement and/or government entity relating directly or indirectly tithe allegation of illegal activity or tortious conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. The request is overbroad. The request seeks information that is irrelevant to the issues in this case. It seeks information that may infringe upon the Plaintiffs constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment. + +Further, in Jane Doe. No. 2 v. Epstein, Case Number 90:08-CV-80893 (D.E. 226), the Court entered an order stating that these documents are confidential and a preliminary ruling + +must be made before they are available for use in this proceeding. Counsel for Epstein in the criminal proceedings, have asserted objections to these records in *Doe v. Epstein*, above, which Epstein adopts herein. + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +U.S. Mail this 16 day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +Email: [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbdd568823431d0e1374b3849ac99341f012a337 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832/EFTA02769832.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769832.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2499, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.46, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACE COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.228, + 54.94000000000001 + ], + [ + 460.7481994628906, + 54.94000000000001 + ], + [ + 460.7481994628906, + 84.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 144.228, + 84.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN'S RESPOANO \nDEFENDANT REOUE T TO PRODUCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.53, + 307.5 + ], + [ + 444.3534240722656, + 307.5 + ], + [ + 444.3534240722656, + 337.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 154.53, + 337.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.306, + 231.522 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 231.522 + ], + [ + 380.589, + 245.479 + ], + [ + 217.306, + 245.479 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769832" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b773a0f814acd0d536ac37342ffc6cd32ebe4d0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +gh his undersigned counsel and N.ss Objection to Interrogatories of the Defendant served on April I, 2011 as follows: Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, b pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure + +1. The Plaintiff objects to th ory served on April 1, 2011, which is actually ory with subparts exceeds the number allowed by the a prior order of this court enlarging the number by at least twice the number ed y. The Defendant has already exceeded the number allowed by this court's ordrrf four interrogatories, because th Florida Rules of Civil Procedure + +Th WW1 also objects to answering any farther discovery responses of the Defendant unlensome and fundamentally unfair until the Plaintiff is able to obtain long standing discovery requests, now over a year old, which will assist in answering this interrogatory. If the plaintiff were to answer now, without the benefit of this discovery, then answering this interrogatory will only have to be :epeated later and will only generate more interrogatories since the answer of necessity will have to be incomplete. Moreover the court will + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +## PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN'S BJECTION TO OF THE DEFENDANT TORIES L L 2011 + +Ca PO C 111 \* 4 Epstein v Rothstein, etc CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff Epstein's Response to Defendant ' Request to Produce + +again have to increase the number of interrogator: es that can be asked again. The plaintiff requests that this court sustain this objection or defer ruling until the other discovery motions are ruled upon, until the Court determines the proper scope of discovery, and until the plaintiff receives discovery propounded over a year ago. Alternatively, the plaintiff seeks protection pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for the reasons set forth above. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Thk14/:7 + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoin furnished by U.S. Mail this day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack A. OSiaberger, Esq. Atterbury Goli:Iberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South trite 1400 eSjtalm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Respectfully submitted, + +.79.4 1 oseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Email: m + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Hagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0b286c93e018c68eb2ff2125ce305cc8789d8ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834/EFTA02769834.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769834.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2758, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.28699999999998, + 47.025 + ], + [ + 463.4599914550781, + 47.025 + ], + [ + 463.4599914550781, + 76.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 146.28699999999998, + 76.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN'S BJECTION TO \nOF THE DEFENDANT \nTORIES \nL L 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.25599999999999, + 299.475 + ], + [ + 477.3928527832031, + 299.475 + ], + [ + 477.3928527832031, + 329.7325134277344 + ], + [ + 126.25599999999999, + 329.7325134277344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Thk14/:7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 226.317 + ], + [ + 497.1263122558594, + 226.317 + ], + [ + 497.1263122558594, + 241.363037109375 + ], + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 241.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769834" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769836/EFTA02769836.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769836/EFTA02769836.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d95e9d114d0c77842c9ffa30077f1f020bc8cc03 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769836/EFTA02769836.md @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +SEARCHED R. BOLTON +SERIALIZED R. BOLTON +INDEXED R. BOLTON +FILED R. BOLTON +CIRCUIT COURT +JUN 16 2011 + +FILED + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will + +take the deposition of: + +Name: + +Cara [REDACTED] + +Date and Time: + +June 10, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. + +Place: + +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral examination before HI TECH/UNITED REPORTING, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed and emailed on this 16 day of May, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart + +& Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +*[Handwritten signature]* +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Ba: No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +[REDACTED] Point + +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 802-9044 +(561) 802-9976 + +cc: + +Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.I201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800raXMA AG + +Defendants. + +/ + +C O + +SI OTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION DU UM + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Cam 1220 NW 157t° Avenue Pembroke Pines, FL 33028 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED depositions at the law offices of F Avenue, 21s` Floor, Fort Laude for the taking of your depositio following: before a person authorized by law to take e Burnett, P.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. 394 on :he 10th day of June, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., action and to have with you at that time and place the + +See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail , ou may be in contempt of court. + +You naed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena b mey or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dat 07th , 2011. + +For the Court + +seph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +[REDACTED] & Burnett, P.A. +*Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein* + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +[REDACTED] Point + +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 802-9044 +(561) 802-9976 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +## SCHEDULE "A" + +# I. PEFINM DNS + +1. "Document" means any document known :o you and every such document which can be located or discovered by reasonably diligent efforts; any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +any printed (whether typed or written by hand), recorded, taped, electro e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter from any source, ho r p uced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whether sent or received or including the original and any copies which contain markings or notations, + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all writi + +all correspondence, letters, notes, notations, memo ter-office communications, releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamphlets, studi of meetings, recordings or other memorials of any type of personal or telephon ions, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and I charge slips), reports, analyses, evaluations, diaries, calendars, desk pads, appoi s, transcripts, journals newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and any derlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record wha ver. + +2. Written "Communica s any documents evidencing communications between you and another person or any kind. + +3. "Referring to," ," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relates to" means in any way directly or indirectly, c ng, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. "And" and ' shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to brin thin a scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to batsi is scope. + +Al5.e ,. pdtein" means the Plaintiff. + +6. 'M'' "You" or "Yours" refers to Cam + +7. " ' means Defendant J. "Rothstein" means Defendant Scott Rothstein. "RRA" or the "Finn" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. + +8. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm, corporation, organization, trust, governmental or public entity, and any of its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +9. "Complaint" refers to the initial pleading or any Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. + +10. All other terms are defined as they are in the Complaint. + +11. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame for this Request is fro Ath day of May, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 2 + +FILED + +11 MAY 19 PM 3:33 + +Respectfully suamitted, + +• vvytlet4 sep L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +Email: + +BURNETT, P. AA + +901 Point West + +777 South Flagier Drive S + +West Palm Beach, Florida + +Telephone: (561) 802-9 + +Facsimile: (561) 8Q19QQ7 + +WV307431NOTTIL21•NOF Affidavit of Al Seckel4LA.docx + +? S r. + +6 S + +## Declaration of Al Seckel + +I, Al Seckel, residing at Malibu, California, declare the following: + +I. I first met Jeffrey Epstein at a TED (Technology, Entertainment and Design) conference several years ago in Monterey, CA, but became better acquainted witi him in 2009. + +2. In 2009, I briefly visited Mr. Epstein at his home in 'Ishii Beach. I did not stay at his home. That is the only time I have visited this residence. + +3. During my visit to this residence, I observed na women who could even remotely be described as minors. Furthermore, I did not witness any sexual contact or suggested sexual innuendo. My discussions with Mr. Epstein were solely confined to issues related to cognitive science and the workings of the inner mind and his support of various worthwhile projects in science and education. We did not discuss his personal life. + +4. I next saw Mr. Epstein in January 2011, when : assembled a group of exceptional and diverse thinkers and achievers, which included a Nobel laureate and ether significant members of the science and finance communities, for a "Mindshift Conference" in the Virgin islands, near Mr. Epstein's residence there. The three day conference was entirely devoted to intellectual discussions. Mr. Epstein was present during the entire conference. At no point, did I ever witness Mr. Epstein in the company of anyone who appeared to be under the age of 18. There was no one under age 18 at the conference, and in fact, many atte could reasonably be described as of senior age. + +5. One day of the Mindshift Conference was s r .pstein's Virgin Islands residence. There was no one present who appeared to be under the age of 18. Mr. Ep 's personal life was neither a topic of discussion of a subject of interest for the attendees or between myself and Mr. Epstein. + +/ + +• QS' • 6. These are the only times that I recall being in t presence of Mr. Epstein. I have never been on his Ovate aircraft. + +eintt-X, 7. I have no personal knowledge of Mr. Epstein's arivate life. Mr. Epstein has not discussed his private life with me and our discussions have been strictly limited to intellectual or philanthropic subjects. + +I have never met or had any discussions with any woman or girl who was under the age of 18 (or 4reyiously under aged) who I know to have had intimate or ron-intimate contact with Mr. Epstein. + +9. I understand that there has been a subpoena issued to depose me based on alleged "credible" infonnation that I have "been in the presence" of Mr. Epstein and women or girls under the age of 18. I have not. Nor have I ever wi eased any sexual behavior or even innuendo Sy Mr. Epstein. + +10. I r understand that I have been identified as having been in Mr. Epstein's presence at the same time that famous or "high-profile" individuals were present. Other than those who are prominent in the scientific ccariunity, I am unaware of any persons in our mutual presence who could reasonably be described this way. + +I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is truthful and fully accurate. e. + +Al Seckel ra + +Dated this 17th day of May, 2011. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769846/EFTA02769846.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769846/EFTA02769846.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5cc535bbf09ed100b934d5c106735df4e76a96ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769846/EFTA02769846.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769846.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4497, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.66, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.44, + 49.592999999999996 + ], + [ + 459.34800000000007, + 49.592999999999996 + ], + [ + 459.34800000000007, + 78.048 + ], + [ + 145.44, + 78.048 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING DECLARATION OF AL SECKEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.47, + 302.436 + ], + [ + 449.04599999999994, + 302.436 + ], + [ + 449.04599999999994, + 316.257 + ], + [ + 148.47, + 316.257 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.948, + 412.191 + ], + [ + 379.356, + 412.191 + ], + [ + 379.356, + 425.199 + ], + [ + 216.948, + 425.199 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Declaration of Al Seckel", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.625, + 60.07899999999999 + ], + [ + 374.62872314453125, + 60.07899999999999 + ], + [ + 374.62872314453125, + 76.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 227.625, + 76.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769846" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6f5c506378ab8e0989944e7fec89d2ba1da1b11 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.md @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +State of Florida + +County of Palm Beach + +15th Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG Court Date: 5/23/2011 9:00 am + +![](_page_0_Picture_242.jpeg) + +Plaintiff: + +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +ROC2011006092 + +vs. + +Defendant: + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +individually, and L.M., individually** + +For: + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Received by Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc on the 7th day of April, 2011 at 11:12 am to be served on +**Alfred Seckel, 20404 Little Rock Way, Malibu, CA 90265-5322.** + +I, Reginald Rock, do hereby affirm that on the 19th day of May, 2011 at 8:18 am, I: + +**NON-SERVED - DILIGENT:** after due search, careful inquiry and diligent attempts was unable to serve the +**Subpoena for Deposition and Notice of Taking Deposition on Alfred Seckel** for the reasons detailed in the +comments below. + +**Additional Information pertaining to this Service:** + +Attempted service at 20404 Little Rock Way, Malibu, CA 90265-5322. Address is occupied by Corrinne Brodbeck, owner of the property. She has owned it since 1975 and does not know the subject. The server attempted the given address of 23930 Ocean Avenue, Apt. 128, Torrance, CA and per the security the subject is not listed on the directory. The server was unable to make contact prior to the client advising to stop service on the documents. + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true. I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the county in which service was effected in accordance with State Statutes. + +SHARON R. BECK +PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL PLAN +CIRCUIT CIVIL PLAN + +**FILED** + +2011 MAY 26 PM 12:35 + +![]()**Reginald Rock** +Process Server #1045 + +**Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc** +2048 Ponce De [REDACTED] Avenue +West Palm Beach, FL 33407 +(561) 296-7574 + +Our Job Serial Number: ROC-2011006092 +Ref: 291874 + +, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendant(s). + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Alfred Seckel 20404 Little Rock Way Malibu, CA 90265-5322 c •L-- + +'49 + +## ION + +YOU ARE COMMAi D to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the offices ire Deposition Services, Suite 500, 1875 Century Park East, Los Angeles, CA n Monday, May 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. PST (12:00 EST), for the taking of your dew this action. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. + +ar subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff(s) Subpoena for Deposition + +> #4." DATED this '7 day of + +• + +ack a On If of the Court ==--J I 7 + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: I 69440 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys ( S H\ for Plaintiffs 6)\* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..787a6fac099b8bcc9383d96a3f93d9651000427f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/EFTA02769849.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3292, + "elapsed_seconds": 9.0, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_242.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.62899999999996, + 16.200000000000003 + ], + [ + 396.978, + 16.200000000000003 + ], + [ + 396.978, + 31.589999999999996 + ], + [ + 210.62899999999996, + 31.589999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Service:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 51.595, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 279.22, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 279.22, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 51.595, + 385.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.48499999999999, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 392.9546203613281, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 392.9546203613281, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 215.48499999999999, + 368.55 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 59 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769849" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/_page_0_Picture_242.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/_page_0_Picture_242.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b27a4d91a71ec4719def3fcc1a632f1c467054a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769849/_page_0_Picture_242.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c3a2a9958c46b5c426ef66034e238545bddbe15e01a3e9594e556f5749b9f1a1 +size 6857 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75a85a61a26434611a52341358a7648a7b900f80 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +/ + +ORDER RE-SETTING HEARING (previously scheduled 5/19/11) + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court, and the pre scheduled pursuant to this Court's Order on Case M cancelled, it is ent Status hav t ng of MiVai t g iabe + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the discovery and privilege issues is re-schedu Wednesday, July 13, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. be County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, (1 day reserved) all motions relating to above-entitled matter for ndersigned, at the Palm Beach in 9C, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. + +In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, pe within a reasonable time prior to any proceeding, contact Palm Beach, Florida 33401. telephone (564 355.2431 a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, give Office of the Court, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 5.25, West 1 ITDDI. or -800-955,0770 M. via Florida Relay Service. + +## Please Note: + +- 1. The JA cannot •s'hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are pe without contacting the JA. +- 3. Any Memorz lums submitted are limited to 10 double spaced pages and must reference the he ate. +- 4. Any m rials bmitted are due at least 7 days prior to hearing. +- 5. The ing party is required to bring to the hearing, lank proposed order with copi O d lopes for all counsel/parties. + +y . + +G ...fa- • % .04 tams ""1 one, 2c&t.c r." + +Pa + +D ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Florida thic• 141 .day of May, 2011. + +DAVID 7. CROW CIRCUIT COURP JUDGE + +Copy furnished: t ROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 ,. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NURIl i diUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1300, Suffolk, • 02116 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b245c882a9dab77f30932418524a02d0f388056 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852/EFTA02769852.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769852.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2140, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.307, + 79.152 + ], + [ + 491.7088928222656, + 79.152 + ], + [ + 491.7088928222656, + 107.853515625 + ], + [ + 61.307, + 107.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Please Note:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.116, + 449.616 + ], + [ + 182.65257263183594, + 449.616 + ], + [ + 182.65257263183594, + 462.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 114.116, + 462.9735412597656 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 155 + ], + [ + "Line", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769852" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..650bd183c8055e8d84f218fd14ef5340e1ad2cb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE l5 .:UDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM 3EACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L. M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CCIVPLEX LITIGATION, Fla. It Civ. P. 1201 + +Case No 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXX MB AB + +## ZeN NON-PARTY A.J. DISCALA'S OBJECTIONS TO RE-NOTICE OIL Of??. TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECCM Of A.J. DISCALA + +Cl 2 nk Co- - a r Q r-7C To. O 'I m C + +Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310, Non-Party.A7 . ("Mr. Discala"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Objec ns tCtfyairtiffs Re-Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum. + +## GENERAL OBJECTIONS + +- 1. Non-party Mr. Discala'nbiccts to the Re-Notice insofar as it seeks documents from Clockwork. +- 2. Non-part,<' Discala objects to the Re-Notice to the extent it seeks "any and all documen with an lf s undefined, vague and so broad as to encompass all documents not stating larity or specificity the documents cr categories of documents and the broad nature makes it impossible to comply in good faith. +- 3. Non-party Mr. Discala objects to the Re-Notice to the extent it seeks documents which were prepared for or in anticipation of litigation, and which are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or is otherwise privileged. + +4. Non-party Mr. Discala objects to the Re-Notice to the extent that it assumes the existence of facts not proven, and any response, objection or production by Mr. Discala is without prejudice to Mr. Discala's continuing objection to suzh improper characterization. + +5. Non-party Mr. Discala's general objections are f\_ncorporated into its response herein. Without waiver of and subject to these objections, Non-party Mr. Discala responds to the Re-Notice as follows: . kv + +## AEO:JES'IS + +- 1. Any and all documents including but )t limited to rresp3gfdence and emails by/between you and any of the following attorneys, employ agents of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment op,o:tur..itieyin y claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) +- b) +- c) +- d) +- e) Michael Fistcn +- 1) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah Ville +- i) Andrew B ett +- j) +- k) +- 1) Christiita,ICitterman Scott Rothstein Adler Richard (Rick) andrey + +ti + +REP ? SrMr : . Discala objects based on his general objections. In addition, Mr. Discala s t y objects insofar as the Request seeks documents that may relate to an investment elated to Mr. Epstein when the responsiveness of the document is not evident on the face of the documents, i.e., it does not refer to Mr. Epstein. Mr. Discala also specifically objects because the origin of the document is not apparent on its face. These objections are based on + +burdensome, vagueness, the work-product doctrine snd attorney-client privilege. Moreover, Mr. Discala specifically objects because there were no investment "opportunities," as is now known. + +- 2. Any and all contracts and/or agreements, inzluding all drafts and final versions, which were provided to you by any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of the former Rothstein law firm relating to any pctentiai investment in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: I, : + +- a) Scott Rothstein , it +- b) Adler +- d) Wi Ber +- e) Michael Fisten CO +- c) lliam er +- f) Kenneth Jcnne +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah 4 2 +- i) Andrew Barnett + +RESPONSE: Mr. Discala obj S ' ol his general objections. In addition, Mr. Discala specifically objects i Request seeks documents that may relate to an investment related to Mr. Epste n the responsiveness of the document is not evident on the face of the documents, i.ey opts not refer to Mr. Epstein. Mr. Discala also specifically objects because the on the document is not apparent on its face. These objections are based on burdenso ess, the work-product doctrine and attorney-client privilege. Moreover, Mr. Discala s ly objects because there were no investment "opportunities," as is now known. + +- 3. Any and all written notes regarding any meetings you were in attendance with any of the following attorneys, employees or agents of he former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or litigatior against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) William Beater +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- f) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah +- i) Andrew Barnett +- k) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- I) Christina Kitterman + +c) RESPONSE: Mr. Discala objects based oi objections. In addition, Mr. Discala specifically insofar as the Request is d to seek documents that may relate to an investment related to Mr. Epstein when the re ns vencss of the document is not evidence on the face of the documents, i.e., it At t ess fer to Mr. Epstein. This objection is based on burdensome, vagueness, the w rk-pr 2t doctrine and attorney-client privilege. Mr. Discala also specifically objects because tore were no investment "opportunities," as is now known. + +- 4. My documents given to you by ary of the following attorneys, employees or agekt f thy` former Rothstein law firm regarding any potential investment in any claim or lifi a against Jeffrey Epstein: + +- a) Scott Rothstein +- b) Adler +- c) William Berger +- d) +- e) Michael Fisten +- 1) Kenneth Jenne +- g) David Boden +- h) Deborah + +- i) Andrew Barnett +- j) in) Richard (Rick) Fandrey +- n) Christina Kitterman + +RESPONSE: Mr. Discala objects based cn :tis general objections. In addition, Mr. Discala specifically objects insofar as the Request seeks documents that may Az dprn late to an investment related to Mr. Epstein when the responsiveness of the document is evi t on the face of the documents, i.e., it does not refer to Mr. Epstein. Mr. Discala cally objects because the origin of the document is not apparent or its face. Th se objc ions are based on burdensome, vagueness, the work-product doctrine and atom Discala specifically objects because there were no ir.ves nt privilege. Moreover, Mr. rtunities," as is now known. + +lly submitted, + +AD AND CASSEL Counsel for the Abraxas J. Discala One Biscayne Tower, 2151 Floor 2 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: 305.373.9447 Facsimile: 305.9 6403 + +By: Jona an Etra, Esq. Flori. Bar No. 0686905 Laur A. Myers Florida Bar No. 015541 + +## CERTIFICATE O F SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and co Tect copy of the foregoing document was delivered via hand delivery to all counsel present at he depos n of Mr. Discala on this 25th day of May, 2011. + +4.1 I -67924210 2 44923RO01 + +By: Jona \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..516829fb77874d14b011171020c0b84fbb5814b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853/EFTA02769853.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769853.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 6587, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.0, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ZeN \nNON-PARTY A.J. DISCALA'S OBJECTIONS TO RE-NOTICE OIL Of??. \nTAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECCM Of A.J. DISCALA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.82799999999999, + 296.2546691894531 + ], + [ + 490.89849853515625, + 296.2546691894531 + ], + [ + 490.89849853515625, + 341.60302734375 + ], + [ + 123.82799999999999, + 341.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL OBJECTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.66, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 375.71478271484375, + 435.7800000000001 + ], + [ + 375.71478271484375, + 451.10302734375 + ], + [ + 230.66, + 451.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AEO:JES'IS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.687, + 242.48899999999998 + ], + [ + 338.642578125, + 242.48899999999998 + ], + [ + 338.642578125, + 258.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.687, + 258.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE O F SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.73399999999998, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 384.3680725097656, + 571.8599999999999 + ], + [ + 384.3680725097656, + 586.8630218505859 + ], + [ + 219.73399999999998, + 586.8630218505859 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769853" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a666c8bc248b74f91cf8a5d52d8cf84ceb9eb611 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF HEARING** + +**YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED** that the undersigned has called up for hearing the +following: + +**DATE:** June 9, 2011 + +**TIME:** 8:45 a.m. + +**JUDGE:** Honorable David F. [REDACTED] (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +**PLACE:** 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**ROOM #:** 9-C + +**SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:** + +Epstein's Response (Obj.) to [REDACTED] RTP served 4/15/11 + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to +resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +SHARON R. BULLOCK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT COURT + +2011 JUN - 7 PM 3:53 + +EPSTEIN + +Edwards adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list this 3rd day of June, 2011. + +![]()Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Sea Cy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL AST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Fistos & Lehrman, FL + +L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik marc@nuriklaw.conC Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein 1CZNIV + +Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein "If you are a person with a disability 'who 'reeds any accommodation in order to participate in this proceedin3, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contactKrista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coord nator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or in mediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, ',all 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algtin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse contacto con Krista Garber Americans with Disabilities Act Coord nator" por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir estt. notificacien si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitachin del oido ode la vcz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim Id bezwer akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kik ed. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen oou n paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tau de oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d66fece88696940dcc2de73729e55721af39469 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858/EFTA02769858.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769858.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3810, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 304.5, + 94.848 + ], + [ + 528.0029999999999, + 94.848 + ], + [ + 528.0029999999999, + 137.28 + ], + [ + 304.5, + 137.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 233.856, + 371.07200000000006 + ], + [ + 364.791, + 371.07200000000006 + ], + [ + 364.791, + 385.216 + ], + [ + 233.856, + 385.216 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.336, + 590.72 + ], + [ + 274.659, + 590.72 + ], + [ + 274.659, + 604.032 + ], + [ + 63.336, + 604.032 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL AST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.908, + 152.805 + ], + [ + 345.39398193359375, + 152.805 + ], + [ + 345.39398193359375, + 168.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 250.908, + 168.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769858" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab50c6c95b43deab1e1b1e2db11d43c48ec3bbaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys hereby CANCEL the deposition +of ██████████ J. ██████████ set for Thursday, July 7, 2011, at 10:30 am. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of July 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff + +cc: Phipps Reporting + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Shannon Mahoney, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Jaffe, Weissing, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea50717222c7dc3422651c3819574dbfd9afcd39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862/EFTA02769862.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769862.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1763, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.718, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 541.4010000000001, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 541.4010000000001, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 305.718, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.99, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 483.54600000000005, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 483.54600000000005, + 365.31000000000006 + ], + [ + 66.99, + 365.31000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.825, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 352.1640319824219, + 136.07999999999998 + ], + [ + 352.1640319824219, + 151.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 258.825, + 151.1080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769862" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7f593eda6311185da60b2302e151f093bb77b96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.md @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +TN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Fl} TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FO 1 PA -M BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +C.& SE ND.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## RE-NOTICE4 ''IZING % + +Cancels UMC hearing f e 2011 at 8:45 a.m. + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFI that c undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +CC -n F m + +DATE: July 13, 2011 + +TIME: 9:30 a.m. + +JUDGE: Ho ble D vid F. (Palm Beath aunty Courthouse) + +PLACE: . Dixie Highway, West Palm Brach, FL 33401 + +ROO + +## SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Epstein's Response (Obj.) to Ee wards RTP served 4/15/11 + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she ccntactal opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this [REDACTED] day of June, 2011. + +[Signature] +JACK SCAROLA + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searey Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley +2130 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrmar, P.L +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"If you are a person with a disability ,s ho needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contactKrista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordi at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or im nediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is 1 than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice imoaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida esita algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse er contacto con Krista Garber Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator" por lo menos 7 días antes de la cita fijada para su compa -ecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 días; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído ode la vo; Ilame al 711." + +-Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa ien okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen ka. èd. Tanpri lontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblèm pou w and e oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2524a7723d16074a4cf943b4bddc977751b15625 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864/EFTA02769864.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769864.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3869, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE4 ''IZING %", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.285, + 370.685 + ], + [ + 374.53499999999997, + 370.685 + ], + [ + 374.53499999999997, + 388.36248779296875 + ], + [ + 222.285, + 388.36248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 603.925 + ], + [ + 277.09499999999997, + 603.925 + ], + [ + 277.09499999999997, + 623.4925079345703 + ], + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 623.4925079345703 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.562, + 137.088 + ], + [ + 347.13, + 137.088 + ], + [ + 347.13, + 150.95999999999998 + ], + [ + 254.562, + 150.95999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769864" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25344d699874bb2a2911c72437b695c53c3fab3e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.md @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +## VERIFIED RETAIL SERVICE + +State of FLORIDA + +Circuit Court + +Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Court Date: 11/11/2014 + +Plaintiff: +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +Ws. +Defendant: +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND BRAELEY J. EPSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY** + +For: +██████████ Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +██████████ WHITE & BURNETT, P.A. +777 S. Flagler +██████████ Point, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +**FILED** +**11 JUN 8 PM 3:48** + SHARON A. BRAELEY, CLERK + PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL + CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + + +Received by Intercounty Subpoena & Investigative Agency on 11/13/2014 at 1:00 pm on CARA ██████████ 1555 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD., #1220, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401. + +I, WAYNE POLLICK, do hereby affirm that on the 6th day of June, 2014, at the address of: + +**INDIVIDUALLY/PERSONALLY** served by delivering a true copy of the following information to the CONSULTANT of SERVICE for DEPOSITION DUCES TECUMSCHEDULE "A" WITNESS FEE IN THE FIRST CHARGE of SERVICE and that the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: **CARA HOLMES** at the address of: **1555 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD., #1220, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401**, and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with the provisions of the Code of Consultants of Service. + +**Additional Information pertaining to this Service** +SERVED SUBJECT AT HER PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT (SELECTION) WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401, #1220, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401. + +**Description of Person Served:** Age: 40s, Sex: F, Race/Skin: Color: White, Height: 5'9", Weight: 140, Hair: Black, Glasses: None + +Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing West Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., #1220, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, and that the facts stated in me are true. I am over the age of eighteen. I have no interest in the above named person or the provided Special Process Server in the Circuit in which it was served and in good standing. NO NOTIFY REPORTED. + +![]()APPROVED FOLLICK + +Service by Subpoena & Investigative Agency +Date (004) 058-9559 +C. B. # 1000 +West Palm Beach, FL 33302 +By # 022-1053 +Date - Serial Number: ISI-2014001917 + +## IN nIE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTI:ENT 4 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff; + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +Connlex L'tigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 2009CA040800 + +### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSIT: ON D CUM + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Cara 1220 NW 157th Avenue Pembroke Pines, FL 33028 + +YOU ARE COMMANDE depositions at the law offices of Avenue, 21" Floor, Fort Laude the taking of your deposition in following: (<4 ar before a person authorized by law to take to Burrell, F.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. 3394 on tt.; 21st day of June, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for action and to have with you at that time and place the + +cos + +See Attached Sch:?dule "A" + +If you fai a ar, you may be in contempt of court. + +Yo subpoena-by enaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this attorney or the court, you shall res )ond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated on , 2011. + +:3y: tha Court L. kerman, Jr. Roy Black + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Mil& Burnett, P.A. Attorne sor Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein allIBURNETT P.A. Point + +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 802-9044 (561) 802-9976 + +Roy Black Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf, P A Attorneys for Plaintiff Jejj5.ey Epstein 201 S Biscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 371-6421 Fax: (305) 358-2006 Florida Bar No. 126088 + +A + +## SCHEDULi. "A" + +# I. DEFINITI DNS + +1. "Document" means any document known :o you and every such document which can be located or discovered by reasonably diligent efforts; any original or copy of such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +an y printed (whether typed or written by hand), mcorded, taped, electr es i,(e. e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible matter from any source, • r produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whethe • sent or received or r ncluding the original and any copies which contain markings or notations, + +all attachments, amendments and addenda of any and all 'tin + +all correspondence, letters, notes, notations mer ter-office communications, releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamph:ets, stu es of meetings, recordings or other memorials of any type of personal or teleph lions, meetings or conferences (including, but not limited to, telephone bills and " ce charge slips), reports, analyses, evaluations, diaries, calendars, desk pads, ap ooks, transcripts, journals newspapers, periodical or magazine materials, and an underlying, supporting or used in the preparation of any documents or record w + +2. Written "Communi s any documents evidencing communications between you and another person of any kind. + +3. "Referring to," ing," "suppo:ling," "evidencing" or "relates to" means in any way directly or indi conceming, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. ' d " ' shall be construed in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in order to brin n the scope of each request all documents which might otherwise be construed to de is scope. + +pstein" means the Plaintiff. + +l=" "You" or "Yours" refers to Can :lolmes. + +7. "M" means Defendant J. M. "Rothstein" means Defendant Scott Rothstein. "RRA" or the "Firm" means Roths:ein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. + +8. "Person" means any individual neural person, partnership, association, firm, corporation, organization, trust, governmental or public entity, and any of its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +9. "Complaint" refers to the initial pleading or any Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. + +10. All other terms are defined as they at in tb Complaint. + +11. Unless otherwise stated, the time frene Co:- this Request is ober 1, 2008, through December 01, 2010. + +# REQUEST£ + +1. Documents evidencing any and all witten of the following employees, independent contractors, attc other representatives of RRA regarding any pending o \ litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of s. ' t , d September 2008 to the present: ions between you and any ers, shareholders, agent or ated litigation, past or settled or claims against Epstein from + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. Rothstein; Adl William +- e. Mik nne; ayne Black; + - • + +2. All written communications betweer you and any of the following employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, share:vide:1, agents or other representatives of RRA regarding any pending or contemplated litigat'on, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims against Epstein from September 2008 to the present. + +- a. Rothstein; +- b. a +- c. +- d. +- e. +- f. +- g. +- h. +- 1. Adler; William Berger; Mike Fisten; Ken Jenne; Wayne Black; + +3. For the time period from March between or on behalf of any agent of RRA purported settlement of any litigation between Epst litigation by an RRA client against Epstein (wh not limited to those: 23 present, any and all documents ,/and any third party regarding a RRA client, or the financing of any t.ng or fabricated clients), including but + +- a. +- b. +- c. +- d. indicating that litigationwit ::pstein has been settled; Z., soliciting orrneei)vin money 'n retire for settlement funds allegedly paid or to be paid by Epstein; soliciting money to help finance ongoing litigation against Epstein; ,czz-,\_z: \_ ff . soliciting money to be given lc, or used on behalf of, any Plainti s in . ( s , litigation against Epstein; anc concerning payments made by RRA to or on behalf of any client that sued Epstein. + +A Co's + +4. All documents which purport to evidence any transfer of funds or property from Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +5. Any employment agreements or documents between You and RRA describing your compensation and benefits as an employee of R ZA. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f97ed3fdaeb4758256b995e6ed802909cebb5ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868/EFTA02769868.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769868.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 6, + "chars": 7992, + "elapsed_seconds": 48.33, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VERIFIED RETAIL SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 190.008, + 59.327999999999996 + ], + [ + 409.85699999999997, + 59.327999999999996 + ], + [ + 409.85699999999997, + 74.984 + ], + [ + 190.008, + 74.984 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN nIE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTI:ENT 4 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.897, + 115.157470703125 + ], + [ + 533.5425415039062, + 115.157470703125 + ], + [ + 533.5425415039062, + 162.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 285.897, + 162.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSIT: ON D \nCUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 163.89, + 320.688 + ], + [ + 430.844482421875, + 320.688 + ], + [ + 430.844482421875, + 335.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 163.89, + 335.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULi. \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.78, + 115.36000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.6254577636719, + 115.36000000000001 + ], + [ + 345.6254577636719, + 131.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 255.78, + 131.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DEFINITI DNS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.78, + 142.552 + ], + [ + 345.8924865722656, + 142.552 + ], + [ + 345.8924865722656, + 158.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 255.78, + 158.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUEST\u00a3", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.967, + 289.051 + ], + [ + 347.1037292480469, + 289.051 + ], + [ + 347.1037292480469, + 305.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 281.967, + 305.11248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 13 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769868" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b72a04243023a156c1df9b0c5d961153d75362d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA u + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040809.)OOOCNIBAG + +in 50 + +/ + +## PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTI N O JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, J. Edw through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of 1\ Na Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Eps prodtfce and permit J. to inspect and copy each of the following d + +- I. Any and all d reflecting, relating to, or suggesting that had knowledge about Rothste mmission of or attempt to commit any fraud prior to the public disclosure of Ro minal conduct. +- 2. and all documents\* which in any way support the claim or claims that Epstei ing against + - 3. All emails that Epstein intends to use or may use as a trial exhibit. +- 4. All documents\* that rebuts, refutes, and/or contradicts the claims Epstein is pursuing against + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +5. Statements from anyone that in any way support the claims Epstein is pursuing against + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical Ahrowritings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, i nee ary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devic•St' reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as cation metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your 'on technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but li to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDA hones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +It is requested tha&the aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, - \_ examination and/or copying. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of June, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Burn P.A. Attorney For: Je pstein 901 777 S Fla West P , FL 33401-6170 Phone: ( 2-9044 Fax: (561) 2-9976 + +Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Phone: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d25cbfc14f17389ab9053b8e5b27f6617037065 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874/EFTA02769874.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769874.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3655, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nu", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 305.824, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.2783813476562, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 530.2783813476562, + 127.488037109375 + ], + [ + 305.824, + 127.488037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTI N O JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 123.424, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 483.1512145996094, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 483.1512145996094, + 336.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 123.424, + 336.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.43399999999997, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 347.89837646484375, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 347.89837646484375, + 150.35302734375 + ], + [ + 259.43399999999997, + 150.35302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769874" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9a9b0f5e14c298fc06d4733b7dce38824fe889c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.md @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PAIM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: Care Holmes + +Date and Time: June 21, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. + +Place: Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +Upon oral examination before HI TECH/UNITED REPORTING, Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +RECEIVED +JUN 29 2011 +FBI - SOUTH CIVIL +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed and emailed on this 6th day of June, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack Goldberger, Esq., Attorbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +*Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr.* + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 235954 +FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. +Phillips Point +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +(561) 802-9044 +(561) 802-9976 + +Roy Black +Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, P. A. +201 S Biscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 +Miami, Florida 33131 +Telephone: (305) 371-6421 +Fax: (305) 358-2006 +Florida Bar No. 126088 + +cc: +Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 S.E. 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +Telephone Number (954) 523-0915 +Facsimile Number (954) 525-0511 +ivy@unitedreporting.net + +1.1%4 TILE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FISTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ?ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +Couple:; Litigation, Fla R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case Nc. 50 2009CA040800 B AG + +#### SUBPOENA FOR DEPOS iTION CUM + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +TO: Cara 1220 NW 157th Avenue Pembroke Pines, FL 33028 + +YOU ARE COMMAND depositions at the law offices o Avenue, 21m Floor, Fort Laud the taking of your deposition following: pea:• before a person authorized by law to take ite Burnett, P.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. 3r4 33394 on the 21st day of June, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for s action any to have with you at that time and place the + +If you fat you may be in conterr pt of court. cos + +See Attached S:hedule "A" + +poenaed to appear by the foiowing attorney, and unless excused from this subpoeg9 ts attorney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +at€d on 2011. + +For the Court By ; Roy Black + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. + +[REDACTED] & Burnett, P.A. + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein* + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] BURNETT P.A. + +[REDACTED] Point + +777 South Flagler, Suite 901 + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +(561) 802-9044 + +(561) 802-9976 + +Roy Black + +Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, P A + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein* + +201 S Biscayne Blvd Ste. 1300 + +Miami, Florida 33131 + +Telephone: (305) 371-6421 + +Fax: (305) 358-2006 + +Florida Bar No. 126088 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +all correspondence, letters, notes, nctati.) releases, agreements, contracts, books, pamphlets, other memorials of any type of personal or tel (including, but not limited to, telephone bills evaluations, diaries, calendars, desk pads, periodical or magazine materials, and a preparation of any documents or reco , inter-office communications, nutes of meetings, recordings or versations, meetings or conferences distance charge slips), reports, analyses, t books, transcripts, journals newspapers, trial underlying, supporting or used in the + +2. Written "Comm between you and another pe means any documents evidencing communications ns of any kind. + +3. "Referrin any way directly or indir o "re ecting," "supporting," "evidencing" or "relates to" means in onceming, disclosing, describing, confirming, or representing. + +4. in order to construed Jo and "or" shall be construe(' in the disjunctive or conjunctive as necessary in the scope of each requnt all documents which might otherwise be de its scope. + +# SCHEDU "t" + +# I. DEt.IN: -IONS + +1. "Document" means any document crow to you and every such document which can be located or discovered by reasonably dilig:: it efforts; any original or copy o such in your custody, possession or control, including, but not limited to: + +an y printed (whether typed or written by land), recorded, taped, e c (e.g., e-mails and text messages), graphic, or other tangible :natter from any sour r produced or reproduced, whether in draft or otherwise, whcCter sent or receiv er, including the original and any copies which contain markings e7 notations, + +all attachments, amendments and addenth of any an V 'tings. + +'Epstein" means the Plaintiff + +6. a "You" or "Yours" refers :o Cara + +7. 0 " means Defendant .1. i idwards. "Rothstein" means Defendant Scott Rothstein. "RRA" or the "Finn" means Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. + +8. "Person" means any individual natural person, partnership, association, firm, corporation, organization, trust, governmental or public entity, and any of its agents, employees, assigns or representatives. + +9. "Complaint" refers to the initial meeting or any Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. + +10. All other terms are defined as they are in the Complaint. + +11. Unless otherwise stated, the time frame for this Request is from October 1, 2008, through December 01, 2010. + +### REQUESTS + +1. Documents evidencing any and all written communications between you and any of the following employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agent or other representatives of RRA regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims against Epstein from September 2008 to the present: + +- a. Rothstein; +- b. [REDACTED]; +- c. [REDACTED] Adler; +- d. William Berger; +- e. Mike Fisten; +- f. Ken Jenne; +- g. Wayne Black; +- h. [REDACTED]; +- i. [REDACTED] + +2. All written communications between you and any of the following employees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of RRA regarding any pending or contemplated litigation, past or settled litigation, investigations, surveillance, incidents of misconduct or claims against Epstein from September 2008 to the present. + +- a. Rothstein; +- b. +- c. Adler; +- d. William Berger; +- e. Mike Fisten; +- f. Ken Jenne; +- g. Wayne Black; +- h. +- i. + +3. For the time period from Mara 1, 2 between or on behalf of any agent of RRA (ine .0 4 r purported settlement of any litigation between Eps i litigation by an RRA client against Epstein (v, \_.. not limited to those: nt, any and all documents and any third party regarding a ' RRA client, or the financing of any mg or fabricated clients), including but + +- a. indicating that li +- b. soliciting o or to be pa ..: Epstein has been settled; money in return for settlement funds allegedly paid ens.; +- c. solic money to help fine.nce ongoing litigation against Epstein; +- d. liciti money to be given to, or used on behalf of, any Plaintiffs in + - ation against Epstein; a- d concerning payments made oy RRA to or on behalf of any client that sued Epstein. + +) O SA + +4. YAII documents which purport :o evEdence any transfer of funds or property from Epstein to RRA, Rothstein or any Rothstein-related entity for the settlement of any case (real or fabricated) against Epstein. + +5. Any employment agreements or documents between You and RRA describing your compensation and benefits as an employee of RRA. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..971a9e3bc0623fb9d04ed7c021e012cb28ecd6b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878/EFTA02769878.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769878.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 7, + "chars": 8272, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PAIM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 300.465, + 106.75200000000001 + ], + [ + 550.549, + 106.75200000000001 + ], + [ + 550.549, + 149.286 + ], + [ + 300.465, + 149.286 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.98700000000002, + 326.09400000000005 + ], + [ + 417.009, + 326.09400000000005 + ], + [ + 417.009, + 340.272 + ], + [ + 206.98700000000002, + 340.272 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 119.66399999999999 + ], + [ + 372.698, + 119.66399999999999 + ], + [ + 372.698, + 132.96 + ], + [ + 221.55499999999995, + 132.96 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOS iTION \nCUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.565, + 321.402 + ], + [ + 444.7989196777344, + 321.402 + ], + [ + 444.7989196777344, + 336.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 173.565, + 336.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDU \"t\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.133, + 128.805 + ], + [ + 357.7607727050781, + 128.805 + ], + [ + 357.7607727050781, + 145.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 266.133, + 145.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. DEt.IN: -IONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.133, + 156.228 + ], + [ + 357.1688537597656, + 156.228 + ], + [ + 357.1688537597656, + 172.61248779296875 + ], + [ + 266.133, + 172.61248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "REQUESTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.538, + 280.54 + ], + [ + 359.919, + 280.54 + ], + [ + 359.919, + 295.47999999999996 + ], + [ + 293.538, + 295.47999999999996 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769878" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcd981e162204d597cbcbf2cb16d9efe617d5d4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.md @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY + +J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the deposition listed below is hereby canceled. + +Name: Cara Holmes + +Date and Time: June 10, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. + +Place: Fowle: [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +One Financial Plaza +100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 + +CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this 6 day of June, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL + +33409, Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Jack Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Joseph Ackerman, Jr. +Fla. Bar No. 335954 + +FCWI:RWHTEBURNETT P.A. +Espirit Santo Plaza, 14th Floor +1395 Brickel Avenue +Miami Florida 33131-3302 +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +Roy Black +Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. +201 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 1300 +Miami FL 33131 +Telephone: (305) 371-6421 +Fax: (305) 358-2006 +Florida Bar No. 126088 + +cc: Hi-Tech/United Reporting, Inc. +1218 SE 3rd Avenue +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 +(954) 523-0915 +[ivy@unitedreporting.net](mailto:ivy@unitedreporting.net) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa09f0cc607ad7f4e7d7d4814deca09220b04b34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885/EFTA02769885.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769885.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1748, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.6, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 335.72400000000005, + 84.975 + ], + [ + 532.674, + 84.975 + ], + [ + 532.674, + 140.25 + ], + [ + 335.72400000000005, + 140.25 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.66, + 334.12500000000006 + ], + [ + 438.138, + 334.12500000000006 + ], + [ + 438.138, + 347.325 + ], + [ + 66.66, + 347.325 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.37, + 526.35 + ], + [ + 401.778, + 526.35 + ], + [ + 401.778, + 539.55 + ], + [ + 239.37, + 539.55 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769885" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ff64a72633a4dd46623e7283153ea12f4259d61 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +11 JUN 10 PM 4:23 +SHARON R. BOURN, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL & FI +FILED + +**DEFENDANT, ██████ J. ██████ NOTICE OF SERVING +ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES** + +COMES NOW the Defendant, ██████ J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby provides Notice with the Court that Answers to Interrogatories propounded by the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, on May 16, 2011, have been furnished to the attorney for the Plaintiff. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail this 10th day of June, 2011, to: See attached list of counsel. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searoy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff(s) + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..577f486937bbafadff56b4f5c7e40cff0c970a7d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887/EFTA02769887.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769887.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2228, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.327, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 530.439, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 530.439, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 306.327, + 84.24 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT, \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 J. \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.499, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.456, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 477.456, + 331.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 128.499, + 331.28999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.504, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 373.312, + 130.41 + ], + [ + 373.312, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 281.504, + 144.17999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769887" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769889/EFTA02769889.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769889/EFTA02769889.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa7847fc8e6a2f5e76205b9b0bc638cdef608b79 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769889/EFTA02769889.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant. + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel S\N + +/ + +## Att• NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +\*Daces l', y + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the s de \*Id attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +C 0. 2 r n 23>, D - c) = CDr -t CD Z O00 th day of June 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] + +cc: Phipps Reporting + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, CONDENSED, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Krista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algtin acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Krista Garber Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notification si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, !lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou park nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an si le ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769893/EFTA02769893.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769893/EFTA02769893.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4982e0a7e577ca24a27dcf33a961e159822df81c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769893/EFTA02769893.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769893.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4206, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.545, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.2593994140625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 542.2593994140625, + 117.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 307.545, + 117.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 202.797, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 405.3520202636719, + 336.96 + ], + [ + 405.3520202636719, + 352.488037109375 + ], + [ + 202.797, + 352.488037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS SA AND TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.08, + 451.03216552734375 + ], + [ + 446.758056640625, + 451.03216552734375 + ], + [ + 446.758056640625, + 470.4053039550781 + ], + [ + 73.08, + 470.4053039550781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 374.53499999999997, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 444.57, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 444.57, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 374.53499999999997, + 465.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.465, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 337.995, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 337.995, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 234.465, + 465.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.998, + 97.461 + ], + [ + 350.175, + 97.461 + ], + [ + 350.175, + 111.622 + ], + [ + 256.998, + 111.622 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769893" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0eae6b57ceb331db1f0f56c8642c831ed14da936 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +2011 JUL - 6 PM 4:44 +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +PAGE D + +**NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM** + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys hereby CANCEL the deposition of Donnie ██████████ set for July 6, 2011, at 10:30 am. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6/11 day of July 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2459 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Plaintiff + +cc: Atlantic Reporting + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: +Fax: +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9810571cf5685653e6ae3593020f6462b31fc007 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897/EFTA02769897.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769897.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1994, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.372, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 534.093, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 534.093, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 309.372, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 124.845, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 484.15500000000003, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 484.15500000000003, + 364.5 + ], + [ + 124.845, + 364.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.40000000000003, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.816, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 350.816, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 258.40000000000003, + 170.91 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769897" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6032fb13abb40b39e486d21b1a8cb588ce391f30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE +TO USE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED UNDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Motion for Leave of Court to use certain documents which are not privileged, which were produced under a Confidentiality Agreement by the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]"). The grounds for this motion are as follows: + +1. On or about February 23, 2011, [REDACTED] produced documents under a Confidentiality Agreement. The production was in two parts. The first documents, were labeled for review by attorney's only. ("Attorney's Eyes Only"). The Second set of documents, were labeled irrelevant, but could be reviewed by Epstein ("Irrelevant"). Under the Agreement, if Epstein's counsel believes the documents were either not privileged or relevant, leave of court would be sought prior to disclosure. These documents were produced under a Confidentiality Agreement and are not identified on the Privilege Log. + +2011 JUL 12 AM 5:00 + +2. Counsel for Epstein believes the following documents which are being submitted in-camera to this Court for review, are either not privileged and/or are relevant and show the following:' + +(1) Meetings related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, whit thing to do with the M' victims claims and contain no confidential informati + +(2) Memos demonstrating intent to try and fo n to settle and specifically going after the people close to him. These memos relit protected by any privilege , (01661; 08420); + +/ (3) Using Q-Tasks for the Ep ,..ccif )`tiers. These documents are not privileged and are needed for future discovery S lbsot s i 5087); + +(4) Using media to fe AZ....vE ards' firm regarding the Epstein case for the purpose of attracting investors. No eC d al information involved in this document (05087); + +(---h' Il (5) Lack of good / faith basis for a motion filed in federal court to freeze Epstein assets pre-judgmehr 4ch was denied. No privilege involved (07304); + +(6) Directing a subpoena to be sent for Epstein medical and prescription records, why e of Epstein's health were raised. No applicable privilege exists (00158); + +) Numerous emails scheduling meetings with and many of the lawyers in Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), including Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), contrary to deposition testimony and to show documents of case that + +For case of reference, the documents are in chronological order. Then by reviewing the documents identified in each paragraph, the Court can see the relevance and lack of privilege, which is still mostly in chronological order but not completely. + +Rothstein had. Documents contain no confidential communications and are merely evidence of the meetings (08412; 026477; 04996; 02992; 27013); + +(8) Email demonstrating knowledge of recording devices in firm including for speaker phone conversations. Document is not privileged and slievikpossible c violation of Florida Criminal Statute relating to wire-taps (01685); + +(9) Email demonstrating contacts with U.S. Attom for the purpose of interfering with the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It is Av r ged because it is a communication with a third party (05112-05113); + +ic,k) (10) Efforts to depose Donald Tma friend of Epstein who had no knowledge of the case and Alan Dershowitz, ( c n artf stein's criminal lawyers in the victim cases also without any knowledge of the e in herance of the purpose of going after those close to Epstein. No privilege info olved (01406; 01212); + +(11) Emails bYl and between Rothstein and A.J. Discala ("Discala"), and other investors showing the need to\_conclude the receipt of investor monies on Epstein cases so that - 7 Rothstein does novlose his Epstein Plaintiffs to other lawyers and so that one Epstein Plaintiff (Th does not report him to The Florida Bar. These are communications with third parties and <;\ involve ttprivilege (26882; 27303; 26817-26818; 26335). + +3. A simple review of the documents will clearly show that it contains no attorneyclient communication and no work product information that relates to an attorney's thoughts or strategies. The emails do contain evidence of the Rothstein's firm to use other extra-judicial or inappropriate judicial means to further the advancement of the Ponzi scheme and thus are not privileged. + +WHEREFORE, PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court review these emails and enter an Order granting permission for Epstein to use these emails and release them from the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing wa tied and mailed this reday of July, 2011 to: + +4S . + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A CO Jack Scarola, Esq. P.O. Palm wer 3626 West Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +t% AC) + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Aila . " Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 N — Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Respectfully submitted, + +k• • twit,,,A\_ + +L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Email: + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d0b082745e58f2fa1043914d4e7159390ced2ee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899/EFTA02769899.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769899.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5832, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 457.35900000000004, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 457.35900000000004, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 72.9 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO USE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED UNDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 529.221, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 529.221, + 353.15999999999997 + ], + [ + 62.727000000000004, + 353.15999999999997 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769899" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acb5a7519ff7496fd219ba5649bf52e5bfbe9862 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.md @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION FOR +PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA TO TRUSTEE, HERBERT +STETTIN FOR RECORDS OF COMMUNICATIONS BY AND BETWEEN +ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT & ADLER, P.A. AND GOVERNMENT/LAW +ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Response to the Motion for Protective Order filed by the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]"), relating to a subpoena issued by Epstein to the bankruptcy trustee for Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), for records of communications by and between RRA and government and law enforcement officials relating to Jeffrey Epstein. + +1. On January 4, 2011, counsel for Epstein sent a subpoena for records of emails and documents by and between RRA and government and law enforcement officials relating to Jeffrey Epstein. A copy of the subpoena is attached as Exhibit "1". + +2. The records requested are relevant because of the allegation in Epstein's Amended Complaint relating to Defendant's plan to interfere with the Non-Prosecution + +Agreement ("NPA") that Epstein entered into with the federal government (Paragraphs 24-27, 29(4)-(5). + +3. At the time the subpoena was issued, the case was set for trial on ght week docket beginning March 7, 2001 through April 29, 2011. Florida Rule o SS il , cedure 1.310(b)(1), allows for subpoenas directly to third parties for records. + +0 4. Counsel for the bankruptcy trustee has conducted a specified search to comply with this request. See Exhibit "2". + +5. Counsel for the bankruptcy trustee has prepWa disk with approximately 10,000 records responsive to this request and is prepared / -it-over to the parties once this Court rules on this motion or otherwise addresses iL tay 'discovery to the bankruptcy trustee. See Exhibit "3". + +6. There is no need .4CLIesiumv era review, or the appointment of a special because the claim of privilege as tied by does not apply. This subpoena is for records relating to communieation{With a third party where no privilege exists. It is also well established that a voluntary disclosure waives any privilege. See § 90.507 of the Florida Statutes (2006); v. Riverside Logistists, Inc., 14 So. 3d 1122, (Fla. 1 51 DCA 2009). Gosman v. Luzinski, b3y7 So. 2d 293, 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), relied upon by does not apply, because in Gosman, the request was directed to a party who had to make the production, not a third party who is already prepared to produce the records, and has not raised a burdensome objection. Moreover, no legitimate claims of privilege can exist because RRA was adverse to law enforcement in the Criminal Victim Rights Act lawsuit identified in paragraph 29(4) of the Amended Complaint. + +7. Consequently, there is no need for an in-camera review or the appointment of a special + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court deny Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Motion for Protecfive Order lifting the stay Order allowing the bankruptcy trustee to provide the documentsobpoenaed. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the f rego tig-Was emailed and mailed this r"'day of July, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Sur Ft. Lauderdale, FL 3 C\_ 01 + ++ L' + +Jeffrey Epstein v Scott Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's Resp to MPO re Trustee's Subpoena, etc. + +Respectfully submitted, + +1 1 + +seph . Ackennan, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +Email: + +BURNETT, + +901 Point West + +777 South Flagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida + +Telephone: (561) + +Facsimile: (561 76 + +Attorneys J + +Cw W )80743 \RESPON4S-Epstem's Response iti ' 84P0 re Trustee Records Government Communications-JLA dots ) 7 r, + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT' ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA: + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Case No. 50 2009CA0408003OOaMB AG + +TO: Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rothstein do Charles Lichtman Berger Singerman, PA Miarni, FL 33131 \ 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000 dt & Adler, PA + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to AN before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the law offices of Burnett, P.A., One Financial Plaza, 100 S.E. 3rd Avenue, 21" Floor, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 on the 20th day of January, 2011, at 2:00 p.m., for the taking of your deposition in this action and to have with you at that time and place the following: + +# SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION DUCES TECUO + +## See Attached Schedule "A" + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of court. + +You bpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless excused from this subpoena b rney or the court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +Dated onel p ,34 2011. + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. & ~Ann Lil Burnett, P.A. Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Espirto Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +![](_page_4_Picture_20.jpeg) + +For the Court + +J. eph L. A crman, Jr., Lilly Ann a Esq. + +### SCHEDULE "A" + +- 1. Any and all email communications by/between any attorney and/o Rothstein law firm, including but not limited to, Scott Ro B e 'c el Fisten, Ken Jenne, David Boden, Debo Richard Fandry, Christina Kitterman, Gar on the one hand, and any of the following regarding Jeffrey Epstein: + - a) U.S. Attorney's Office; + - b) State of Florida Attorney's Office; + - c) Federal Bureau of Investigations; + - d) City of Palm Beach Police Department; + - e) Any investigator working for the State of Florida; +- f) Any attorney, law firm and any agent of any attorney or law ficsIfttcpresented any ee of the former Adler, William + +individual with a claim against Jeffrey Epstein. V AS A)9 ( S i Nor 6 S WAS0743Oiscovery\Subpocria DT for Depositice- Al Discaladocx + +## IN TILE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. individually, and L.M., + +Defendants. + +#### NOTICE OF TAKING ON + +/C ), PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersetpr attorney or an attorney of the firm will take the deposition of: + +Name: + +Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOOCISIB AG Aam. + +04 + +Date and Time: + +Place: + +0 + +Upon oral amination before US LEGAL AKA KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. This deposition is being taken for the purposes of discovery, for the use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the rules of the Court. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed this 4th + +,.%Herbert Stettin, Trustee in Bankruptcy for RRA + +Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. + +Burnett, P.A. One Financial Plaza 100 Southeast 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 + +day of January, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, Attorneys for Scott Rothstein, One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +![]()Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. + +Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +![]()Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor + +1395 Brickell Avenue + +Miami, Florida 33131-3302 + +Telephone: (305) 789-9200 + +Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 + +cc: US Legal aka Klein, Bury & Associates, Inc. + +L. Ackerman, Jr. + +From: Lilly Ann Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:02 PM To: Charles H. Lichtman' Cc: L. Ackerman, Jr.; Subject: names for subpeona E. KNIGHT + +The following names are to be used in the search-How long do you think it will take? + +### US Attorneys Office + +Villafana, Asst. US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, US Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, l u Asst. US Attorney Matthew Menchel, Asst. US Attorney Andrew Lourie, Asst. US Attorney + +### Palm Beach Police Department\* + +Sgt. Chris Keen Lamont Lee Detective Captain Gudger Curtis D. Krauel Recarey + +Michael Dawson Pagan Gregory Parkinson + +\*All of these names were listed in the polic Cpelrt as the reporting officers + +FBI + +Agent Nebit Kirkendahl Agent Jason Richard + +### State Attorney's Offi(c'e.\ + +Barry E. Krischer, State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek, Asst. State Attorney + +![](_page_8_Picture_13.jpeg) + +![](_page_8_Picture_15.jpeg) + +cos + +vCard | Biography | Website + +305.789.9200 main +305.789.9279 direct +305.728.7579 fax + +Espirito Santo Plaza +1395 Brickell Avenue +14th Floor +Miami, Florida 33131 + +[REDACTED] + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY + +**From:** Charles H. Lichtman [mailto:Clichtman@bergersingerman.com] +**Sent:** Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:20 AM +**To:** Lily Ann [redacted]; Robert Carney; Gary [redacted]; Seth Lehrman +**Cc:** Hmstettin@bellsouth.net +**Subject:** MORE DOCUMENTS re Epstein + +As you know, Mr. Epstein's counsel served upon the Trustee a refined email search which sought documents reflecting communications between RRA lawyers and state and /or governmental officials, largely, if not all, law enforcement officers. I now have a disc of documents for each of you responsive to the subpoena, bate stamped w pages 1 through 10214. I have not reviewed the disc at all, and based upon the search terms, I highly doubt there is anything that could qualify as privileged since the search terms by definition included solely third party communications. Nevertheless, in an abundance of caution, we will review our standard protective order just to make sure the estate is protected. Assuming that to be the case, I intend to then forward to each of you a copy of the disc. + +B I O + +![](_page_10_Picture_159.jpeg) + +**BERGER SINGERMAN** +attorneys at law + +**Charles H Lichtman** + +350 East Las Olas Boulevard +Suite 1000 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Telephone: (954) 526-9900 +Fax: (954) 523-2672 + +Direct Line: (954) 712-5138 +E-mail: Clichtman@bergersingerman.com + +Bosa Raton Et Leuderdale Miami Tallahassee +www.bergersingerman.com + +Please consider the environment before printing this email. + +This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney work product or attorney client privileged. If this information is received by anyone other than the named and intended addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone at the phone number of the sender listed on the email and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s). Thank you. + +\*\*\*\*\* +\*\*\*\*\* + +CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER: This communication does not constitute a "covered opinion" as such term is defined within Circular 230, and does not comply with the requirements for a "covered opinion." We have not conducted, nor have we been asked to conduct, that type of analysis in this communication. To + +![](_page_10_Picture_169.jpeg) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..399a756b32ff5fa9e142d5c330ee818b85dccf88 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/EFTA02769903.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,666 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 11, + "chars": 12160, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.29, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_4_Picture_20.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_13.jpeg", + "_page_8_Picture_15.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_159.jpeg", + "_page_10_Picture_169.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 457.35900000000004, + 43.74 + ], + [ + 457.35900000000004, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 71.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA TO TRUSTEE, HERBERT STETTIN FOR RECORDS OF COMMUNICATIONS BY AND BETWEEN ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT & ADLER, P.A. AND GOVERNMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.215, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 323.19 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 405.81000000000006 + ], + [ + 82.215, + 405.81000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH \nJUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM \nBEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 301.455, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 92.1085205078125 + ], + [ + 301.455, + 92.1085205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION DUCES TECUO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.7, + 249.48 + ], + [ + 455.03179931640625, + 249.48 + ], + [ + 455.03179931640625, + 264.978515625 + ], + [ + 182.7, + 264.978515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "See Attached Schedule \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.16400000000002, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 380.5199890136719, + 458.46 + ], + [ + 380.5199890136719, + 473.4785461425781 + ], + [ + 241.16400000000002, + 473.4785461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SCHEDULE \"A\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.4100036621094, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 354.438, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 354.438, + 75.2135009765625 + ], + [ + 268.4100036621094, + 75.2135009765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN TILE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \n15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, \nFLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 333.123, + 99.83999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.2243041992188, + 99.83999999999999 + ], + [ + 529.2243041992188, + 158.353515625 + ], + [ + 333.123, + 158.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING \nON", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 201.57900000000004, + 350.272 + ], + [ + 402.54900000000004, + 350.272 + ], + [ + 402.54900000000004, + 366.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 201.57900000000004, + 366.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "US Attorneys Office", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 121.85404205322266, + 211.41 + ], + [ + 121.85404205322266, + 225.0791015625 + ], + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 225.0791015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Palm Beach Police Department*", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 176.72496032714844, + 318.33 + ], + [ + 176.72496032714844, + 332.3390808105469 + ], + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 332.3390808105469 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "State Attorney's Offi(c'e.\\", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 138.90390014648438, + 559.71 + ], + [ + 138.90390014648438, + 573.8390808105469 + ], + [ + 28.622999999999998, + 573.8390808105469 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 88 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769903" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_159.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_159.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c04b2df3c4e51f3afcdf0ed0402c8572a3de40a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_159.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9f285bd947025cf4cdbeaf543bf3a45a13ac51f02f38b76617a800fcba35a8d2 +size 6864 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_169.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_169.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5d313ad7b6110ca96a71c922c4e92e3786c1173 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_10_Picture_169.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a59683cd4dbe0303affcaa86cbbaf60aad2b72325b08e4b5d6522321ffd684a2 +size 7828 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_4_Picture_20.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_4_Picture_20.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2882f67855ac2b30d7417d3050ca1922572ed1b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_4_Picture_20.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e7642f8d38bdd6286e0866f4f97535d5ccf8be76b6eec2f4de950aeee40524fd +size 8168 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..836022e6d64b0f839e7bf6c4ac672bfb7d41dd40 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:451cdb2e5ec6be8a821d3c94a07b60b9243bb08b4e486734864ec193fb059376 +size 5254 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0daa2fb00e17f2c877ecd92e9fb2ba385d5066e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769903/_page_8_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ee3fbc8c27e5a20c9933d832979ce51d22b245e714021e5e3cadecaa081909e1 +size 7804 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e6caa9e3d6ec5fa904542e9fc8ebc4a907f04ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.md @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +State of Florida County of Palm Beach + +Case Number: 502009CA040800)OO0M AG Court Dalt 7/7/2011 10:00 am + +Plaintiff: + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +vs. + +Defendant: + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, individually, and L.M., individually J. + +For: + +Jack Scarola + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +R ' Rolf/Services & Investigations Inc on the 27th day of June, J. , 2000 Springdale Blvd, Apt 309, Palm Springs, FL 3 r- x rig + +![](_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg) + +I, Mario Corletto, do hereby affirm that on the 6th day of July, 2011 at 12:54 pm, I: + +15th Circuit Court + +ROC20 10 2791 + +ern CC) -n co r - !IC + +NON-SERVED - DILIGENT: after due search, careful inquiry and diligent attempts was unable to serve the Sub na Duces Tecum for Deposition and and Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum on J. for the reasons detailed in the comments below. + +## Additional Information pertaining to this Service: + +I attempted the provided address of 2000 Springdale Blvd, Apt 309, Palm Springs, FL 33461 and it was found to be tenant was . I then attempted 230 Cypress Lane, Lake Worth, FL 33461 and it was found to be the Palm the Salatinoi. c e . Per Mr. Salatino tie was told by the leasing office when he moved there that the previous Springs Police Department/Fire Rescue and/the subject was unknown at this addresss. The client advised to nonserve. / + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true. I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the aboveiaction, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the county in which service was effegf n accordance with State Statutes. + +Mario Corletto + +Process Server #1055 + +Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc 2048 Ponce De Avenue West Palm Beac 33407 (561) 296-7574 + +Our Job Serial Number: ROC-2011012791 Ref: 291874 + +12791 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +J. [REDACTED], individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +7/16/11 +mc #105 + +\_\_\_\_\_ + +SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] +2000 Springdale Blvd., Apt. 309 +Palm Springs, FL 33461 + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the offices of undersigned counsel on Thursday, July 7, 2011, at 10:00 AM, for the taking of your deposition in this action. You are to have with you at the above place and time the following: + +**\*Duces Tecum: to have and bring with you at the time of the deposition the following:** + +Any and all documents reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +1. 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +2. 2. or the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED thiscA lay of June 2011. + +'a, 7 Ce-t...',.S Jack 2: it//Scarola Behalf of the Court C O + +Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 4 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 \ 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Plaintiffs \* + +49 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..13906d1748f70c2cf4480d358a0a24ef67ff8f01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/EFTA02769914.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3588, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.43, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF NON-SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 209.07, + 21.8419189453125 + ], + [ + 400.0459899902344, + 21.8419189453125 + ], + [ + 400.0459899902344, + 39.26593017578125 + ], + [ + 209.07, + 39.26593017578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Service:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 50.298, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 279.9801940917969, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 279.9801940917969, + 391.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 50.298, + 391.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.52, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 441.52500000000003, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 441.52500000000003, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 170.52, + 352.35 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769914" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85a0915333247272232a05918c99a938d887f113 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769914/_page_0_Picture_5.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:63c21c02e4442de39676dcebc310bcce1c2a578712a216a9c5567a2ccaeb1c3d +size 9071 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..368aae0945b3d29343884f8ef847bd0e12035d6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +2011 JUL 14 PM 12:53 +SHAROM R. BOCK, CLERK, +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S +MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN REGARD TO THE DEPOSITION +DUCES TECUM OF RECORDS CUSTODIAN AND TRUSTEE HERBERT STETTIN + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the above Motion, the Court heard argument of counsel and is fully advised in the premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +The Subpoena seeks all e-mail communication between various attorneys of the former Rothstein firm and various governmental offices regarding JEFFREY EPSTEIN. The request is not limited to time, subject matter or scope and, according to the documents presented to this Court, could be in excess of 10,214 pages of e-mails. At this point, the Court finds that the request is overbroad and not necessarily calculated to lead to admissible evidence. The purported basis for obtaining these records is to establish some type of "abuse of process" in regard to the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the government and the Plaintiff. At present, there is no pending Complaint by the Plaintiff which has withstood a Motion to Dismiss dealing with the issue of whether or not some actions by the Defendant in regard to the non-prosecution agreement could constitute "abuse of process". Therefore, the Defendant's Motion for Protective Order is + +granted and the Objection to production of records is hereby granted, both without prejudice. e • kdft + +DONE AND ORDERED this& day ofJuly,iat Palm Beach County, Florida. + +DAVID F. + +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +AROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes BI aim Beach, FL 33409 + +L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Beach, FL 33401 Point West, West Palm + +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +MARC NU DIRE, One E. Broward Sly , Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. e., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park c") 1000, Suffolk, U 02116 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4736d76652e0ce259ec280069113d29d3d7deb14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917/EFTA02769917.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769917.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2253, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.206, + 75.516 + ], + [ + 489.648, + 75.516 + ], + [ + 489.648, + 101.5 + ], + [ + 61.206, + 101.5 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN REGARD TO THE DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF RECORDS CUSTODIAN AND TRUSTEE HERBERT STETTIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 81.20400000000001, + 304.5 + ], + [ + 512.6759999999999, + 304.5 + ], + [ + 512.6759999999999, + 341.852 + ], + [ + 81.20400000000001, + 341.852 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769917" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db267568ccc1c93db24cedb7b27e2c83c9c3cc9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY + +CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION + +THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon [REDACTED] J. EDWARD's Motion for Reconsideration predicated upon the most recent opinion from the Fourth District Court of Appeal in [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED] *Tire & Rubber Co.* (citation omitted) in regard to this Court's Order sustaining Plaintiff's Objections to Discovery Requests. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +Initially, this Court would note that the decision in [REDACTED] is still on Rehearing and, therefore, it is not a final opinion. Nevertheless, based upon argument of counsel, [REDACTED] J. EDWARD's Motion for Reconsideration is denied except as to Interrogatory No. 1 and Interrogatory No. 7 and the Plaintiff shall respond to said discovery within ten (10) days of this Order. The Court finds that the Objections as to the discoverability of the questions and documents (i.e., relevant or calculated to lead to admissible evidence and/or overbroad) are sustained in the form currently submitted under the pleadings as currently filed. + +DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of July, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()2011 JUL 14 PH 12: 53 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +END + +Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +[REDACTED] L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 [REDACTED] Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +GARY M. [REDACTED], JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +[REDACTED] WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c189a1e155dd58c5ae3c5d297835a5e49ec665e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919/EFTA02769919.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769919.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2078, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 73.17 + ], + [ + 489.648, + 73.17 + ], + [ + 489.648, + 99.186 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 99.186 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 61.812, + 252.84300000000002 + ], + [ + 424.19999999999993, + 252.84300000000002 + ], + [ + 424.19999999999993, + 265.038 + ], + [ + 61.812, + 265.038 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769919" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9293730c53727525458fd5523be0f6e8e4c532b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +State of Florida County of Palm Beach + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XX XMB AG Court Date: 7/6/2011 10:30 am + +Plaintiff: JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +vs. + +Defendant: SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, RADLEY J. individually, and L.M., individually + +For: Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & S ipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Received by ROCK LEGAL SERVIC S & INVESTIGATIONS INC on the 28th dawth served on Donnie M, 1242 SW riarwood Drive, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986. + +I, Jesse • P.S. 05-04, do hereby ffirm that on the 5th day of July, 2011 at 9:30 pm, I: + +INDIVIDUALLY/PERSONALLY served by delivering a true copy of the Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition and and Notice of Taking Depositikm Duces Tecum with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Donnie at the address of 1242 SW Briarwood Drive, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986, and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes. - + +Military Status: Based upon inquiry cf party served, De #id 4 '\ si\. of in the military service of the United States of America. + +15th Circuit Court + +I + +Pi + +## Additional Information pertaining to this Sery + +6/29/2011 10:00 am Silver malibu in drivew YXX. No answer. + +6/30/2011 4:30 pm Malibu in driveway. erver left card. + +7/1/2011 3:00 pm Server attempted e home, no vehicles in driveway. + +7/4/2011 5:45 pm No one home, no garage. eway. Card still there. Server thinks they may go in and out of + +Description of Person Served: Abp Sex: M, Race/Skin Color: Black, Height: 60. Weight: 195, Hair: Black, Glasses: Y + +I certify that I am over 18, t' ve no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, In good standing, in th al rcuit in which the process was served. + +> Jesse a az 1 05-04 Process Server + +ROCK LEGAL SERVICES & INVESTIGATIONS INC 2048 Ponce De Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33407 (561)296.7574 + +Our Job Serial Number: ROC-2011012790 Ref: 291874 + +![](_page_0_Picture_25.jpeg) + +9N + +\ -a V + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO: + +502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi ually, J. individually, nd L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). 0\290;pc) + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DiPOSITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA + +TO: Donnie 1242 SW Briarwood rive Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 + +YOU ARE CO D to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the ffices dj µndersigned counsel on Wednesday, July 6, 2011, at 10:30 AM, for the taking.6f%ur positiion in this action. You are to have with you at the above place and time th + +\*Duces Tecum: to have and bring with you at the time of the deposition the following: + +Any and all documents reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +- 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. or the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. + +If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED this 21st day of June 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorneys for Plaintiffs \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfbe07b4827f9e0772d71e61c3c23c9e402df9a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/EFTA02769921.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3449, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.27, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_25.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 382.43695068359375, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 382.43695068359375, + 43.39593505859375 + ], + [ + 225.93899999999996, + 43.39593505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Additional Information pertaining to this Sery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 47.502, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 275.877, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 275.877, + 424.46759033203125 + ], + [ + 47.502, + 424.46759033203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR DiPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.52, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 441.52500000000003, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 441.52500000000003, + 353.4785461425781 + ], + [ + 170.52, + 353.4785461425781 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 111 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769921" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/_page_0_Picture_25.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/_page_0_Picture_25.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1f4f71e514d2654b57e7b78c3b513262789719c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769921/_page_0_Picture_25.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c9eb3709674a76eb9b4775b5cffd587fe086019731220f0e04b22e857cc1c39f +size 5884 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86d9ba0fa8bde2f1def65c662261b0b3938c2f3c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +• + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +p rn S yn v.o (-^ / DSO ..13 . -0 'Gs -- . r - t kfi + +Defendant(s). + +OMNIBUS ORDER IN REGARD TO UPDATE DEPOSITION LA + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon v ions in regar1:1-\* tatne Defendant, J. request for upda on of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, as well as a Request to Produce served upon EDW S Motions to Impose Sanctions against JEFFREY EPSTEIN. The Court h d argument and has reviewed the pleadings and is otherwise fully advised premises. Based upon the foregoing, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDER ND ADJUDGED as follows: + +The Defendant C 1 exh itled to take an update deposition of the Plaintiff in regard to the specific is "identified and more specifically relating to public statements made by thetAitiff regarding his criminal activity, testimony dealing with any claim the Pliichas waived his Fifth Amendment rights and/or has otherwise lost his Fifth A dm nt rights. The Defendant Motion to Compel and Impose Sanctidcll Failure to Attend the Deposition is denied. In regard to the Request to Produce submitted to the Defendant by the Plaintiff under certificate of service the 7th day of April, 2011, the Court recognizes that there is a difference between "fact work product", "opinion work product", and "contention discovery". "Opinion work product" is almost never discoverable, "fact work product" is discoverable under limited circumstances, and, according to the most recent pronouncements from the Fourth District, "contention discovery" is allowed. Therefore, the Defendant shall respond to the + +Request to Produce and assert any privilege in a privilege log, including any work product privileges. The Defendant may do so in a manner which will not divulge or otherwise disclose the nature of the documentation itself and if the parties cannot agree, the documents shall be submitted to the Court for an in camera review to determine whether the matters constitute "fact work product", "opinion work product" or merely "contention discovery". + +DONE AND ORDERED this cr tclay f July, 21311 at West Elt -ach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +DAVI CIRCUIT O JUDGE + +Copy furnished: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes 8~est Palm Beach, FL 33409 L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. F e Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australia 9l,Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NUIOUIRE, One E. Broward B1 ,,Su 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 , JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft.jiguderdale, FL 33301 mill WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Par &lite 1000, Suffolk, 02116 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..281800466747908c33ebcab376a0e7f0ba59879f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924/EFTA02769924.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769924.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2731, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 101.277 + ], + [ + 493.1689758300781, + 101.277 + ], + [ + 493.1689758300781, + 130.22406005859375 + ], + [ + 62.41799999999999, + 130.22406005859375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769924" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ccf7b294306fb1cdb729d5accc5615bf7311b3a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and J. and L.M., individually, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +r CO -0 + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF EIN'S RESPONSE Ti DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION SER + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey j stei pstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350, e orida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Response to the Request for from the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. (e), Reques uction Served June 9, 2011, and would state as follows: + +- I. Since Epst s not be able, due in large part to the objections of to obtain all relev uments that would reflect, suggest. or relate to i knowledge of Rothstein' , it is not possible to to produce all documents responsive to this request. Howeve its to the deposition of A.J. Discala, Kretschmar, and Michael Legamaro due fit and are responsive to this request. In addition, the documents that are exhibits to Epstein's Motion to Use Confidential Documents are also responsive. + - 2. See Response to Number 1 above. + - 3. Undetermined at this time. + +4. Objection. Work product. See Grinnel Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Boulevard Limited, 924 So 2d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). + +5. Objection. Work product. See Grinnel Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Boulevard Limited, 924 So 2d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing yes qtailed this Nfik of July, 2011 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldbe Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33 S0l Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, 00, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola et al lm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409; an Weinberg, Esq., 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk,. 02116. + +Ily submitted, + +LZV seph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..404724b3752a3ea17ea531383fe4e92ca41fe22d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926/EFTA02769926.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769926.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2260, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.59599999999998, + 49.592999999999996 + ], + [ + 464.95001220703125, + 49.592999999999996 + ], + [ + 464.95001220703125, + 78.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 148.59599999999998, + 78.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFF EIN'S RESPONSE Ti \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF REQUEST FOR \nPRODUCTION SER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.65100000000001, + 330.07800000000003 + ], + [ + 524.6915893554688, + 330.07800000000003 + ], + [ + 524.6915893554688, + 372.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 84.65100000000001, + 372.49249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769926" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..daf2ef387696ee359f67260f27a34846486a1f77 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.md @@ -0,0 +1,531 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████ J. ██████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 JUL 19 PM 3:30 +SEARCH R. BOOK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +FILED + +**MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO +ASSERT A CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES** + +Defendant, ██████ J. ██████, Esq., by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.190(f), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for leave to amend to assert a claim for punitive damages, and in support thereof relies upon the following evidence in the record and such additional evidence as is herein proffered\*: + +**I. INTRODUCTION** + +The pleadings, discovery taken to date, and the evidence proffered with this motion show that a reasonable basis exists to support the recovery of punitive damages against the Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that ██████ participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of ██████ involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against Epstein and the fact that the sole basis for the assertion of the spurious claims filed against ██████ was an attempt to intimidate ██████ into abandoning + +the legitimate claims was prosecuting against Epstein on behalf of victims of Epstein's pattern of criminal sexual abuse of minors. Epstein sexually abused three clients of — L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe — and properly and successfully represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in capable and competent representation of his clients could serve as the basis for a civil lawsuit against him. Alleg ipns about support any belief in the truth of those allegations. participation in or knowledge of the use of the civil actions against l in a "Ponzi Scheme" were not supported by any competent evidence and could supported by competent evidence as they are entirely false and Epstein never reason to believe otherwise. The dismissal of the unsupported, unsuppo nsational allegations that was a knowing participant in a massi al fraud and the subsequent abandonment of those allegations is further conf tqsfr n that no reasonable basis ever existed to + +( \-7 + +# A. Epstein's Complaint + +, I, + +Epstein's Complaint essplitiallyfilieged that Epstein was defrauded by M, acting \_i in concert with L.M. (a minor female who was sexually abused by Epstein) and Scott 7 Rothstein (Preside tt of t1 Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm ("RRA") where worked for a p 'od of time). Epstein appears to have alleged that joined L.M. and R Nltefn in fabricating sexual assault cases against Epstein to "pump" the cases to Ponzi sche investors. As described by Epstein, investor victims were told by Rothstein that three minor girls who were sexually assaulted by Epstein: LM., E.W., and Jane Doe were to be paid up-front money to prevent those girls from settling their civil cases against Epstein. In Epstein's view, these child sexual assault cases had "minimal value" (Complaint at 42(h)), + +and refusal to force his clients to accept modest settlement offers was claimed to breach some duty that owed to Epstein. Interestingly, Epstein never states that he actually made any settlement offers. Even more interesting, all of the allegations of M knowing involvement in Rothstein's fraud disappeared from Epstein's first Amended Complaint along with the claims for civil remedies for criminal conduct and Florida RICO vi ti ns. This is a clear admission that no probable cause existed to support any of tho egations and claims to begin with. 0 + +The supposed "proof of the Complaint's allegations a t) includes alleged contacts with the media, his attempts tciscovery from high-profile persons with whom Epstein socialized, and use of aAly inflammatory" language in arguments in court (Complaint at 42(e)). Remar \I stein has filed such allegations against despite the fact that Epstein had s while they were minors. Indeed, in scovery Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege rather than answer about the extent of the sexual abuse of his many victims. Even more rem bly, since filing his suit against M, Epstein has now settled the three cases Ed ds died for an amount that Epstein insisted be kept confidential. Without violafttlhe strict confidentiality terms required by Epstein, the cases did not settle for ,( i the "minimal value" that Epstein suggested in his Complaint. Because Epstein relied upon the alleged discrepancy between the "minimal value" Epstein ascribed to the claims and the substantial value sought to recover for his clients, the settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed to pay while these claims against were pending will be disclosed to the court in camera. Of course, those false allegations have also now disappeared from the a used each of clients and others + +most recent Amended Complaint, but the amendment does not erase the fact that the baseless allegations were made. + +### 13. Summary of the Argument + +The claims against J. M Esq., were patently frivolous for at least two separate reasons. + +First, because Epstein has elected to hide behind the shield of ght against self incrimination to preclude his disclosing asy relevant inform t the criminal activity at the center of his claims, he is barred from prosecuting t c e against I . Under the well-established "sword and shield" doctrine, ein annot seek damages from while at the same time asserting a Fifth ae nt privilege to block relevant The filing of a case seeking affirmakv ie when there was no intention at the time of filing to comply with the discovery obligations arising from such filing is compelling evidence that the case was filed forreasoris unrelated to obtaining the relief specified in the \\ Complaint. + +Second and most fundame ly, Epstein's lawsuit was never supported by probable cause to believe any of the spurio s accusations on which it was based, each and every one of which is directly contract\* d all of the record evidence. From the beginning, diligently represente ictims of sexual assaults perpetrated by Epstein. As explained in detail below, all o Edwards's litigation decisions were grounded in proper litigation judgment about the need to pursue effective discovery against Epstein, particularly in the face of Epstein's stonewalling tactics. successful representation finally forced Epstein to settle and pay appropriate damages. Effective and proper representation of child victims who have + +been repeatedly sexually assaulted cannot form the basis of a separate, "satellite" lawsuit, since even improper conduct in the course of the prosecution of a lawsuit may not form the basis of a separate claim by virtue of the absolute bar of the litigation privilege. Filing a claim known to be barred by absolute privilege is further evidence that the claim was filed for reasons other than in a legitimate effort to obtain the relief sought in the Complaint. + +The truth is the record is entirely devoid of any evidence to support E s elairns and is completely and consistently corroborative of sworn innocence. Put simply, Epstein made allegations that had and have no basis in He included those allegations in a lawsuit that was and is bared by bo d-shield doctrine and the absolute litigation privilege. His lawsuit was merely measure by a serial pedophile to prevent being held accountable in compens t and punitive damages for repeatedly sexually abusing minor females. He was that threatened to expos more criminal charges and harsher penalties. Epstein's ulterior motives in fi osecuting this lawsuit are blatantly obvious. Epstein's behavior is another clear demonstra ion that he feels he lives above the law and that because of his wealth he can manipulate the system and pay for lawyers to do his dirty work - even to the extent of having-tbem assert baseless claims against other members of the Florida Bar. Epstein's Complaint against' and LM is nothing short of a far-fetched fictional fairy-tale with absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support his preposterous claims. It was his last ditch effort to escape the public disclosure by and his clients of the nature, extent, and sordid details of his life as a serial child molester. o to shut down an investigation effort by + +# ARGUMENT + +### II. THE PROFERRED FACTS ESTABLISH THAT CONDUCT COULD NOT POSSIBLY FORM THE BASIS OF ANY LIABILITY IN FAVOR OF EPSTEIN + +This is not a complicated case for punitive damages because there is compelling and unrebutted evidence that each and every one of Epstein's claims against merit whatsoever. lacks any + +# A. Was Simply Not Involved in the Rothstein Ponzi Sc me + +The bulk of Epstein's claims against hinged on the c remise that was knowingly involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleged generally that ' .. actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler], [Scott] Rothstein and the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good \ N faith and with the best interests of their clientkin mind at all times when in reality, was] . . . acting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzi scheme described herein." Complaint , 150. Similar broad allegations ary.scatiered willy-nilly throughout the Complaint, although none of the allegations provide any e as to how might have assisted the Ponzi scheme. See, e.g., id. at TT 2 5, 27, 28, 42, 50. In any event, these allegations all fail for one straightforward on: was simply not involved in any Ponzi scheme. He has provided s imony and an affidavit in support of that assertion, and there is not (and could ne71;) any credible contrary evidence. + +has now been deposed at length in this case. As his deposition makes clear, he had no knowledge of any fraudulent activity in which Scott Rothstein was involved. See, e.g., Depo. at 301-02 (Q: " . . . [W]ere you aware that Scott Rothstein was trying to market Epstein cases .. . ?" A: "No."). + +has supplemented his deposition answers with an Affidavit that declares in no uncertain terms his lack of involvement in any fraud perpetrated by Rothstein. See, e.g., Affidavit attached to Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as Exhibit "N" at 18-10, 120, ¶22-23. Indeed, no one could reasonably believe that scheme, as was involved in the joined RRA well after Rothstein began his fraud and woJ4 Piave been already deeply in debt. In fact, the evidence of Epstein's crimes is now c actions in this case were entirely in keeping with his obligation to pr id ighest possible quality of legal representation for his clients to obtain the best result ssible. + +In view of this clear evidence rebutting all allegati him, Epstein must at least establish that he had a good faith basis to support his ations. By choosing to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege to remain silent, he o fails to meet that burden. Indeed, when asked at his deposition whether he had an involvement, Epstein declined to answer, purportedly on attorney-c}i t v ege grounds: + +> 1 . I want to krow wl1lther you have any knowledge of evidence that personally ever participated in devising a plan through w 0. lcwere sod purported confidential assignments of a structured payout settlement?... + +A. I'd like to answer that question by saying that the newspapers have reported that his firm was engaged in fraudulent structured settlements in cerri es to fleece unsuspecting Florida investors. With respect to my sonal knowledge, I'm unfortunately going to, today, but I look forward it some point being able to disclose it, today I'm going to have to sert the attorney/client privilege. + +See Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010 (hereinafter "Epstein Depo.") at 67-68. + +# B. Epstein Did Not Suffer Any Harm from Allegedly Fraudulent Presentations to Investors. + +At various points in his Complaint, Epstein seems to have alleged that he can pursue a claim against because Rothstein defrauded third-party investors. Epstein alleges that various investors were given fraudulent pitches by Rothstein and were bilked out of money as a result. See, e.g., Complaint 128, 29, 30. Even assuming that the allegahons about Rothstein are true (and they certainly are not challenged by this Motion), is still obviously entitled to assert a claim for punitive damages for the additional reason that Epstein was not harmed by these fraudulent pitches and ha o plausible basis to claim that he was. Epstein was obviously not present during the q@se rations. Indeed, as review of 4 Epstein's Complaint makes clear, he did not even At the fraud until it became public knowledge through the mass media. See, e. Foc Sop t ¶16 ("The details of this fraudulent scheme are being revealed on a d ' bas through various media report and court documents."). + +'S ) To proceed on any ca of ction, Epstein is required to prove harm. See, e.g., Bartell v. Mountains Ins Opp, Ltd., 2 So.3d 1041, 1047 (Ha. 4111 DCA 2009); S & Investments v. P Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Epstein was r -.> not harmed, bir Rothstein's misrepresentations to other people that he knew nothing about. + +# ON'Enstein's Allegations Against Were and Are Unfounded and Not \ Actionable in Any Event. + +At various points in his Complaint Epstein inconsistently recognized that was not involved in any Rothstein Ponzi scheme. Therefore, seemingly as a fallback, Epstein alleged without explanation that "should have known" about the existence of this concealed + +Ponzi scheme. For example, in his Complaint Epstein alleged: "Upon information and belief, knew or should have known Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for the massive Ponzi scheme . . ." Complaint at 26 (emphasis added). Among other problems, this fallback negligence position suffered the fatal flaw that it does not link at all to the five counts in the complaint, all of which alleged intentional fraud or conspiracy. + +The five counts in the Complaint all allege criminal — i.e., intention activity. The five counts are: Count 1 — Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practi CPA); Count 2 — Florida RICO; Count 3 — Abuse of Process; Count 4 — Fraud; an t 5 — Conspiracy to Commit Fraud. To take Count 1 as an example, Epstein alleges at "engaged in a pattern of criminal activity as defined in §772.102(3) and (4), Fla Stat. (2009)." Epstein then alleges (without any elaboration) that committed such crimes as fraud, extortion, and perjury — crimes that are listed as actionable under the FCRCPA. See Fla. Stat. Ann. §772.102(1)(a). Crimes such as these require proof of criminal intent. Proving the crime of perjury, for example, requires proof that "testimony was in fact false testimony, and that [the defendant] knew of its falsity and Willfully and with deliberation swore to it as true." Rader v. State, 52 So.2d 105 108 (Fla. 1951) (emphasis added). Proving the crime of fraud requires proof that the acted with "intent to defraud" Pizzo v. State, 455. So.2d 1203, 1207 L. (Fla. 2000( A7 1 mph'asis , added); see also Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, 39 So.3d 1216, 2010 WL 2400 84 at \*15 (describing fraud, conversion, civil theft, and abuse of process as "intentional torts" that require "proof of intent"). Moreover, not only do the underlying crimes require proof of criminal intent, but the FCRCPA itself requires proof that a defendant must have acted "with criminal intent," Fla. Stat. Ann. §772.103(1), or "conspire[d]," §772.103(4), in + +order for a cause of action to proceed. Nothing in the statute allows a claim to move forward on a mere allegation of negligence. + +Epstein's negligence claim is also deficient because it simply fails to satisfy the requirements for a negligence cause of action: + +> "Four elements are necessary to sustain a negligence claim: 1. a duty, or obligation, recognized by the law, requiring the [defendant] to conform to a certain standard of conduct, for the protection of others against unreasonable risks. 2. A failure on the [defendants] part to conform to the standard required: a breach of the duty . .. 3. A reasonably close causal connection between he conduct and the resulting injury. This is what is commonly known as 'legal cause,' or 'proximate rause; and which includes the notion of cause in fact. 4. Actual loss or damage." + +Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, 39 So.3d 1216, 2010 WL 2400384 at \*9 (Fla. 2010). Epstein does not allege a particular duty on the part of Edwards that has been breached. Nor does Epstein explain how any breach of the duty might have proximately caused him actual damages. + +Finally, for the sake of completeness, it is worth noting briefly that no reasonable basis existed to claim was negligent in failing to anticipate that a managing partner at his law firm would be involVetin an unprecedented Ponzi scheme. Scott Rothstein deceived not only b more than 60 other reputable lawyers at a major law firm. Cf . Sun Sentinel, F • erdale, Dec. 11, 2009, 2009 WLNR 25074193 at \*1 ("Sure, some outlan is o Grisham murder plot[s] sound far-fetched. But if you asked me a few months ago if Scott Rothstein was fabricating federal court orders and forging a judge's signature on documents to allegedly fleece his friends, as federal prosecutors allege, I would have said that was far-fetched, too."). No reasonable lawyer could have expected that a fellow member of the bar would have been involved in such a plot. Nobody seemed to know of Rothstein's Ponzi + +scheme, not even his best friends, or the people he did business with on a daily basis, or even his wife. Many of the attorneys at RRA had been there for years and knew nothing. was a lawyer at RRA for less than eight months and had very few personal encounters with Rothstein during his time at the firm, yet Epstein claims that he should have known offff Rothstein's intricate Ponzi scheme. No doubt for this reason the U.S. Attorney's Officehas trtow listed as a "victim" of Rothstein's crimes. See Statement of Undi d Facts filed contemporaneously. + +Epstein's Complaint does not offer any specific reason w Cdone could conclude —\_, /- --\\ that was negligent, and he chose not to offer anskexplimation of his claim at his deposition. 2 k I \ / + +#### \ \/1 D. Was Properly Pursuing., terests of His Three Clients Who Had Been Sexually Abused by Epstylfi ' + +The next claim that Epstein a' is at somehow improperly enhanced the value of the three civil cases f against Epstein. represented three young women — L.M., E.W., and J — by filing civil suits against Epstein for his sexual abuse of them while they were minors. Epstein purports to find a cause of action for this by alleging that w was involved in "'pumping' these three cases to investors." Complaint at 1151; se at 91 136, 41, 42(0, 42(k) (similar allegations of "pumping" the cases). + +explained, to the extent that Epstein is alleging that somehow did something related to the Ponzi scheme, those allegations fail for the simple reason that was not involved in any such scheme. , for example, could not have possibly "pumped" the cases to investors when he never participated in any communication with + +investors as has now been confirmed under oath not only by but by every investor deposed by Epstein. + +Epstein's "pumping" claims, however, fail for an even more basic reason: was entitled — indeed ethically obligated as an attorney — to secure the maximum recovery for his 4 clients during the course of his legal representation. As is well known, "[a]s a vocate, a lawyer zealously asserts the client's position under the rules of the adve stem." Fla. Rules of Prof. Conduct, Preamble. therefore was req pursue (unless otherwise instructed by his clients) a maximum recovery Epstein. therefore, cannot be liable for doing something that his e, ties as an attorney required nor can he be liable for conduct that falls squarely within lute protection of the litigation privilege. See the Fla. S. Ct.'s opinion in Echeva s hed. + +Another reason that Epstein's claims was "pumping" cases for investors fails is that filed all three easaMtst a year before he was hired by RRA or even <,7 knew of Scott Rothstein. Epsteifirnake# allegations that the complaints contained sensational allegations for the purposes of lurifig investors; however, language in the complaints remained virtually unchanged from the first filing in 2008 and from the overwhelming evidence the Court can see,for itself that all of the facts alleged by in the complaints were true. + +Epstein ultimately paid to settle all three of the cases filed against him for \ more money than he paid to settle any of the other claims against him. At Epstein's request, the terms of the settlements were kept confidential, but the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal in each of the cases required Epstein to bear all costs and fees incurred in his defense, thus precluding him from claiming those costs and fees as damages in any action against la + +The sum that he paid to settle all these cases is not filed with this pleading and will be provided to the court for in camera review. Epstein chose to make this payment as the result of a federal court ordered mediation process, which he himself sought (over the objection of Jane Doe, client in federal court) in an effort to resolve the case. See Defendant's Motion for Settlement Conference, or in the Alternative, Motion to Direct P r itei \ I' back to Mediation, Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-CV-80893 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2010 4168) attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Notably, Epstein sought thisCt , J.) (doe. conference and ultimately made his payments as a result of that conference - • ly 2010, more than seven months after he filed this lawsuit against A been the victim of any scheme to "pump" the cases against him, because he never paid to settle the cases until well after Scott Rothstein (December 2009), and the s6Se of the Rothstein fraud was fully exposed.' y, Epstein could not have had left RRA and had severed all connection with + +In addition, if Epstein had a there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's cas his edy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra w o was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply choae to settle that case. He is therefore now barred not only by the litigation privilege but also by the doctrine of res judicata from somehow re-litigating what happened at (for-example) the Jane Doe case. "The doctrine of res judicata makes a judgment on the merits conclusive 'not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim, but as to every other matter which might with propriety have been litigated and determined in that action." AMEC Civil, LLC v. State Dept of Transp.,41 + +To er his effort to harass and intimidate Epstein also filed a bar complaint with the Florida Bar against . The Florida Bar has dismissed that complaint. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + +So.3d 235, 2010 WL 1542634 at \*2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (quoting Kimbrell v. Paige, 448 So.2d 1009, 1012 (Fla. 1984). Obviously, any question of improper "pumping" of a particular case could have been resolved in that very case rather than now re-litigated in satellite litigation. + +E. is Immune From Any Claim For Abuse of Process Beca e He Acted Properly Within the Boundaries of the Law in Pursuit of the Le nterests of his Clients. + +improper, or perverted use of process; and defendant, the plaintiff suffered d So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA mal citation omitted). In fact, has correctly stated this cause in his counters against Epstein. While claim is unassailable, Epstein cannot prove these' and never had any good faith basis to believe he could. Epstein's Complaint also raised the claim of "abuse of pr singly stated allegations appear to be related to those just discussed, but culni a separate cause of action — count 3 — alleging "abuse of process." An ab cess claim requires proof of three elements: "(1) that the defendant made improper, or perverted use of process; (2) that the defendant had ulterior n,\ ti or purposes in exercising such illegal, tih at, a result of such action on the part of the I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 + +The 74 firs etrient of an abuse of process claim is that a defendant made "an illegal, tts: improper, o rted use of process." On the surface, Epstein's Complaint appears to contain se ral allegations of such litigation-related impropriety. On examination, however, each of these allegations amounts to nothing other than a claim that Epstein was unhappy with some discovery effort, motion or argument made by M. This is not the stuff of an abuse of process claim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was damaged as the + +result of pursuit of the claims against him beyond the self-inflicted losses that flowed from his own criminal conduct. See Marty v. Grath, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla. 1 DCA 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where "appellant's lawsuit caused appellee to do nothing against her will"). + +In any event, none of the allegations of "improper" process was or could be supported because every action took was entirely proper. iQpurposes of completeness, the following is a point-by-point refutation of Epstein's + +- Complaint ¶42(a): properly included IistedVanfages in Jane Doe's federal action of more than \$50,000,000, were the damages that was going to seek at trial on bepal f1 e Doe. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶42(b): was dip help Jane Doe exercise her First Amendment rights to criticize lenient plea bargain he received in a criminal case, See Statement n ted Facts, and criticizing what happened in the criminal case is not a na in an unrelated civil case; +- Complaint ¶ 42(c): nly asked reasonable questions of ..421n at his deposition, all of ated to the merits of the case against See Statement of Unespute acts. +- Complaint only pursued legitimate discovery designed to further the cases fi amst Epstein. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. . . ¶ 42(e): M did not made "ridiculously inflammatory and soundstatements, but rather made statements supported by the evidence. For ple, there is ample evidence that Epstein has abused more than 400 children, e Statement of Undisputed Facts, a fact that Epstein has always invoked his Fifth Amendment right of silence regarding rather than elaborate. fraudulent transfer loa.sets in federal court where had evidence that +- Complaint ¶ 42(f): properly filed a motion o restrain Epstein's Epstein was titling cars and other assets in the names of other persons, See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + +Epstein also fails to meet the second clement of an abuse of process claim: that had some sort of ulterior motive. The case law is clear that on an abuse of process claim a "plaintiff must prove that the process was used for an immediate purpose other than that for which it was designed." Sctl Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So.3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4i° DCA 2010) (citing Biondo v. Powers, 805 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 4th DC 2 2). As a consequence, "[w]here the process was used to accomplish the result for whi as intended, regardless of an incidental or concurrent motive of spite or ulterior ere is no abuse of process." Id. (internal quotation omitted). Here, enied any improper motive, See Statement of Undisputed Facts, and Epst o evidence of any such motivation. Indeed, it is revealing that Epstein cho k even a single question about this subject during the deposition of Edw n dition, all of the actions that Epstein complains about were in fact used for the i te purpose of furthering the lawsuits filed by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. In o , these actions all "accomplished the results for which they were intended" t was securing additional discovery or presenting a legal issue to the court h dling the case -- ultimately leading to the full recovery of damages for the victims of E tein's olestations. + +F. P Discovery Concerning Epstein's Friends Was Reasonably Calculated to Relevant and Admissible Testimony About Epstein's Abuse of Minor + +Epstein alleged that improperly pursued discovery from some of Epstein's close friends. Such discovery, Epstein claims, was improper because knew that these individuals lacked any discoverable information about the sexual assault cases against Epstein. + +Each of the friends of Epstein was reasonably believed to possess discoverable information. The undisputed facts show the following with regard to each of the persons referenced in each of Epstein's now dismissed complaints: + +- Complaint ¶38(i): With regard to Donald Trump, had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + - - +- Complaint ¶38(ii): With regard to Alan Dershowitz (Harvard' .1Aw Professor), had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Dershowitz had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Complaint ¶38(iii): With regard to former President Bill Clinton, had sound legal basis for believing former President Clinton had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of/ndisputed Facts. +- Complaint 38 iv): With regard to/ fdtoThe ,,Sony Record executive Tommy Mottola, was not the attoriv/thatnoticed Mr. Mottola's deposition. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. \ XX, +- Complaint ¶38(v): With regard' to, illusionist David Copperfield, had sound legal basis for believintMr. Copperfield had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. +- Com laint ¶40 i : With regard to former New Mexico Governor Bill , had sound legal basis for naming Former New Mexico Governor Bill on his witness list. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. + +As to the dstence of a reasonable basis for pursuing discovery from all of the above, see also the ,A filed pt of the recorded conversation with + +It \worth noting that the standard for discovery is a very liberal one. To notice someone for a deposition, of course, it is not required that the person deposed actually end up producing admissible evidence. Otherwise, every deposition that turned out to be a "false alarm" would lead to an abuse of process claim. Moreover, the rules of discovery themselves provide that a + +deposition need only be "reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b) (emphasis added). + +Moreover, the discovery that pursued has to be considered against the backdrop of Epstein's obstructionist tactics. As the Court is aware, in both this case and all other cases filed against him, Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege rather than answer any su Epstein has also helped secure attorneys for his other household staff who assi recruiting his minor female victims. Those staff members in turn also assec t questions. process of fth Amendment rights rather than explain what happened behind closed doors in Epste s tansion in West Palm Beach. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. It is against this followed up on one of the only remaining lines of inquiry open to him: disoove / have been outside of Epstein's sphere of influence and. in a position to either directly confirm or aimed at Epstein's friends who might circumstantially corroborate the fact that Epstein was sexually abusing young girls. + +In the context of the sexual apsaulta.le that had filed against Epstein all which \j, included the potential for the re-co-very ofpuriitive damages, any act of sexual abuse had undeniable I relevance to the case — even acts of abuse Epstein committed against minor girls other than L.M., E.W., or Jane Doe. federal and state evidence rules make acts of child abuse against other girls admissible in ain s case in chief as proof of "modus operandi" or "motive" or "common scheme or e Fed. R. Evid. 415 (evidence of other acts of sexual abuse automatically admissible civil case); Fla. Stan Ann. §90.404(b) (evidence of common scheme admissible); v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959) (other acts of potential sexual misconduct admissible). + +A second reason exists for making discovery of Epstein's acts of abuse of other minor girls admissible. Juries considering punitive damages issues are plainly entitled to consider "the existence + +and frequency of similar past conduct." TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443, 462 n.28 (1993). This is because the Supreme Court recognizes "that a recidivist may be punished more severely than a first offender . . . [because] repeated misconduct is more reprehensible than an individual instance of malfeasance." BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 577 (1996) (supporting citations omitted). In additi es can consider other similar acts evidence as part of the deterrence calcul m awarding punitive damages, because "evidence that a defendant has repeat in prohibited conduct while knowing . . . that it was unlawful would provid ant support for an argument that strong medicine is required to cure the defe respect for the law." Id at 576-77. In the cases filed against Epste is were entitled to attempt to prove that Epstein "repeatedly engaged in pt ib conduct" — i.e., because he was a predatory pedophile, he sexually assaulted and dozens of minor girls. The discovery of Epstein's friends who might have or circumstantial evidence of other acts of sexual assault was accordingly entire! + +G. Assertions Should Have Known That the Three Cases Had "Minimal" ere and Are Clearly Spurious Because the Cases in Fact Had Substantial V e. + +47 A fm ' de by Epstein is that "knew or should have known that their three ft ere weak and had minimal value." Complaint 142(h). It is now no longer necessary t speculate about the value of the three cases. Epstein voluntarily paid to settle all three cases — a decision made after Rothstein's fraud had been discovered and fully revealed and as a consequence of the decision to settle the cases, could not have been influenced by any fraud. Epstein has insisted that the sum he paid remain confidential. As such, the Settlement + +Agreements have not been attached as an Exhibit, but can be shown to the Court in camera. In light of the sum that was paid, no reasonable jury could now find that the cases had "minimal value." + +### III. EPSTEIN'S LAWSUIT LACKED ANY LEGITIMATE PURPOSE FROM THE OUTSET BECAUSE OF HIS REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN REASONABLE DISCOVERY. + +As is readily apparent from the facts of this case, Epstein filed a lawsuit int g to refuse to allow any real discovery about the merits of his case. Instead, when 11 questions about whether he has any legitimate claim at all, Epstein has hidden behind 'dill Amendment. As a result, under the "sword and shield doctrine" widely recognized 9u da caselaw, his suit must be dismissed. + +"[T]he law is well settled that a plaintiff i o titled to both his silence and his lawsuit." Boys & Girls Clubs of Marion County, Inc. v 2 So.3d 855, 856 (Fla. 5ih DCA 2009) (= J., concurring specially). Thus, "a perton not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the Fifth Amendment to av td gvt discovery, using the Fifth Amendment as both a 'sword and a shield.' DePalma v. Depalma, 8 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (quoting DeLisi v. Bankers Insurance; 436 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)). Put another way, "[a] civil litigant's fifth amendm ' t t avoid self-incrimination may be used as a shield but not a sword. This means that a seeking affirmative relief in a civil action may not invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse Qf comply with the defendant's discovery requests, thereby thwarting the defendant's defenses." Rollins Burdick Hunter of New York Inc. v. Euroclassic Limited, Inc., 502 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3al DCA 1983). + +Here, Epstein did precisely what the "well settled" law forbids. Specifically, he sought "affirmative relief' — i.e., forcing to pay money damages — while simultaneously precluding from obtaining legitimate discovery at the heart of the allegations that form the basis for the relief Epstein claimed to be seeking. As recounted more fully in the statement of undisputed facts, Epstein has refused to answer such basic questions about his lawsuit as: + +- "Specifically what are the allegations against you which you contend ginned up?" +- "Well, which of Mr. M' cases do you contend w gated?" +- "Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was filedigainst you in September of 2008 which you contend to be false?" +- "I would like to know whether you ever referred to as Jane Doe in that [federal +- "Did you ever have any phys con with E.W.?" ical contact with the person +- "What is the actual valu tbkynu contend the claim of E.W. against you has?" + +The matters addressed id these questions are the central focus of Epstein's claims against M . Epstein's refusal swer these and literally every other substantive question put to him in discovery has depn Edwards of even a basic understanding of the evidence alleged to support claims against him. o er, by not offering any explanation of his allegations, Epstein is depriving opportunity to conduct third party discovery and opportunity to challenge Epstein's allegations. + +It is the clear law that "the chief purpose of our discovery rules is to assist the truth-finding function of our justice system and to avoid trial by surprise or ambush," Scipio v. State, 928 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 2006), and "full and fair discovery is essential to these important goals," McFadden v. + +State, 15 So.3d 755, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Accordingly, it is important for the Court to insure "not only compliance with the technical provisions of the discovery rules, but also adherence to the purpose and spirit of those rules in both the criminal and civil context." McFadden 15 So.3d at 757. Epstein has repeatedly blocked "full and fair discovery," and obviously intended to do so from the day his claims against were filed—facts from which a reasonable inference can an be drawn that he never intended to prosecute his spurious claims but only to use th 11'1 r purposes of 0 + +# intimi 11111 IV. ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCSAROM EPSTEIN'S F THE FIFTH AMENDMENT + +Epstein's repeated invocations of the Fifth Am adverse inferences against him that leave no possibility that a reasonable could ever accept his allegations against M. Given all of the infe are to be drawn against Epstein, no reasonable finder of fact could cone pstein was somehow the victim of improper civil lawsuits filed against him a reasonable finder of fact could only find that Epstein was a serial molester dren who was being held accountable through legitimate suits brought by on behalf of the minor girls that Epstein victimized. + +Regard! whether viewed in the context of a litigant seeking affirmative relief or simply de "[l)t is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferericds.aga st parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. + +Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, "'Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bikkumsky v. To 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). + +A In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have " of the most persuasive character" from Epstein's repeated refusal to answer que'sQs propounded to him. To provide but a few examples, here are questions that Epste. oy answer and the reasonable inference that a reasonable finder of fact would draw: + +- Question not answer Sfically,-w at ae the allegations against you which you contend Mr. ginned up?" Reasonable inference: No allegations against Epstein were ginned up. +- Question not answered: yen, which of Mr. cases do you contend were fabricated?" Reaso le infeFence: No cases filed by against Epstein were fabricated. /CT) +- Question not artiweredc'Did sexual assaults ever take place on a private airplane on which you Wes/tassel:Ter?" Reasonable inference: Epctrin was on a private airplane while sex assaults were taking place. +- Question not answered: "How many minors have you procured for prostitution?" ie inference: Epstein has procured multiple minors for prostitution. estion not answered: "Is there anything in L.M.'s Complaint that was filed against you in September of 2008 which you contend to be false?" Reasonable inference: Nothing in L.M.'s complaint filed in September of 2008 was false i.e., as alleged in L.M.'s complaint, Epstein repeatedly sexually assaulted her while she was a minor and she was entitled to substantial compensatory and punitive damages as a result. +- Question not answered: "I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that [federal] complaint?" Reasonable inference: Epstein had physical contact with minor Jane Doe as alleged in her federal complaint + +- Question not answered: "Did you ever have any physical contact with E.W.?" Reasonable inference: Epstein had physical contact with minor E.W. as alleged in her complaint. +- Question not answered: "What is the actual value that you contend the claim of E.W. against you has?' Reasonable inference: E.W.'s claim against Epstein had substantial actual value. + +have absolutely no legitimate basis in fact. Without repeating each and every invocation of the Fifth Amendment that Epstein has made and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from those invocations of privilege,lbe big picture is (7 unmistakably clear: No reasonable finder of fact could rule in Epstein'sjavoton is claims against Accordingly, is entitled to inferences that the claims' against him had and \ + +The inferences against Epstein are not limiltXtftose arising from his privilege assertions. Epstein's guilt is also reasonably itiferredlrom his harassment of, intimidation of, efforts to exercise control over, and limitation oc, access to witnesses who might testify against him. \\ + +Epstein's efforts to intitnidate his victims support the inference that Epstein knew that they were going to provide compelling testimony against him. The evidence that Epstein tampered with wi es ater designated as his accomplices and co-conspirators) will be admissible t o ate his consciousness of guilt. "Mt is precisely because of the egregio of such conduct that the law expressly permits the jury to make adverse inferences from a party's efforts to intimidate witnesses " + +Jon v Ahmad, 730 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1998) (internal quotation omitted). To be clear, Epstein's attempt to tamper with witnesses is "not simply admissible as impeachment evidence of the tampering party's credibility. The opposing party is entitled to + +introduce facts regarding efforts to intimidate a witness as substantive evidence." Id. at 711 (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted). This substantive evidence of Epstein's witness intimidation provides yet another reason why no reasonable jury could find in favor of his claims against + +# CONCLUSION + +For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant Defendant, Bradley J. la, Esq., the right to assert a claim for punitive damages against Jeffrey steinfor his intentional abuse of process for the illegitimate purpose of attempting to deter efforts to advance the interests of his clients in holding Eps exploitation and sexual abuse of minors. responsible for his serial + +# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 75.1.' , 2011, a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. + +> Jack Scarola, Esquire Florida Bar No. 16 Searcy Denney Scarola 2139 Palm Beach Lakes West Palm Beach, FL Phone: 561486-6300( Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys foric, " J. s) hipley PA + +\* All referenced erials have previously been filed with the court and delivered in support of Ed of n for Final Summary Judgment. + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Shannon Mahoney, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +CO ' + +Gary M. Fanner, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Poin 777 S Flagler Drive t West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. N One E Broward Blv , Suitd700 Fort Lauderdale, Phone: (954)- 4 Fax: (954)- Attome 301 Rothstein + +Wei g, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARRAJ + +JANE DOE, + +Plaintiff, vs. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Defendant. + +#### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE. MOTION TO DIRECT PARTIES' BACK TO MEDIATION + +Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, moves this Court for an order requiring the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. M, or in the alternative, for an Order directing the parties to reconvene at a second mediation on or before July 1, 2010, and as grounds set forth would state: + +1. The above-styled matter is currently scheduled on the Court's trial docket beginning July 19, 2010. (D.E. #119, Order Re-Setting Trial Date and Pretrial Deadlines). The Court's Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation and Motions in Limine deadlines are set for July1?. 10. In this regard, if the parties could reach an agreement at a settlement conference or a mediation before these pre-trial deadlines, it would result in substantial conservation of judicial resources and preparation time. + +2. The parties attended mediation on April 5, 2010, at Matrix Mediation, LLC, with Rodney serving as mediator, but were unable to reach an agreement. (See D.E. #139). + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-110893-MARRA + +Page 2 + +3. Since the April 5, 2010 mediation, additional discovery has been completed and exchanged, including each parties' psychological (Plaintiff) and psychiatric (Defendant) expert depositions. As well, Defendant filed his Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Bifurcation. Both parties have exchanged witness and exhibit lists. Each party will be filing extensive Motions in Limine. Plaintiff's Tr List has identified over 170 potential witnesses, and further, Plaintiff identl f over 140 trial exhibits, including composite exhibits that are hundreds of pag.%P gth. It is conceivable this case could last 12- 20 trial days. + +4. Additionally, since the parties attended mediation on April 5, 2010, Defendant has resolved all pending lawsuits, including Plaintiff, Ct. (Case No.: 10-80447) and JANE DOES Nos. 2-8 (Case Nos.: 08-80119,08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80802), C.M.A. (Cage No,08-80811), Jane Does Nos. 101, 102 and 103 (Case Nos. 09-80591, 09-80656, 10-80309), another Jane Doe (Case No. 08-80804), Jane Doe II (Case No. 0940469), as well as other non-filed claims. Furthermore, Defendant has also resolved three state court claims. The only cases not resolved are this case and two (2) cases in state court (all three Plaintiffs are represented by Plaintiff's counsel, Brad NM, Esq. and his firm). I + +5. Plaintiffs in other filed cases were represented by various law firms as the court is aware. + +6. With the additional discovery completed to date and with the motions, trial preparation and judicial rulings necessary to try this case, all yet to be done, Defendant + +That is also a case styled L M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. CASE NO.: 09-CIV-S1092 — aolARRS which was never served on the Defendant. Defendant has fired a Mahn to Dismiss. + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: OS-CIV-80893-MARRa + +Page 3 + +believes that a settlement conference or mediation is in the best interest of both parties to attempt resolution. There is no prejudice to either party. + +7. Therefore, Defendant requests the Court issue an order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge or that the Court direct the parties to attend a further mediation before July I, 2010. Both Magistratstidge and Rodney (as the mediator in this case) are very with the particular case and other claims that were asserted. + +8. Defendant's Counsel has spoken with the secretary fo ediator, Rodney and she believes that he would be able to 2-3 hour mediation on short notice this week. + +WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY STE 1 respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson, or in the alternative, a mediation on or before July 1, 2010. + +# Rule 7.1 Certification + +I hereby certify that counsel has communicated by telephone with Plaintiff's counsel in faith effort to resolve the issues set forth herein. Plaintiff's position is that have already complied with the mediation requirements. + +> By: s/Robert D. Critton, Jr. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike Attorneys for Defendant Epstein + +Doe v. Epstein + +CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARItia + +Page 4 + +## Certificate of Service + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CMIECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing geniteaSeby CM/ECF on this 2811 day of June, 2010: + +Brad r, Esq. Jaffe, Weissing, S Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave. Suite #2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Brad@nathtoiustice.com + +Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax casselln@law.utah.edu Co-counsel for Plaintiff + +Jack Alan Gold , Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 561-835-8691 Fax iagesrabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +Respectfully submitted, + +By: Al Robert 13. Critton. Jr. ROBERT D. CR1TTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bc1claw.corn MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 runike@bc1claw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LIJTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/243-0164 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) + +# Westlaw + +Page 1 + +950 So.2d 380, 32 Fla. L. Weekly S64 (Cite as: 950 So.2d 380) + +#### Torts 379 e=122 + +Supreme Court of Florida. ECHEVARRIA, McCALLA, RAYMER, BAR-REIT & FRAPPIER, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. M=., etc., Respondent. + +> No. SC05-564. Feb. 1, 2007. + +Background: Mortgagors who defaulted on their loans sued law rum retained by lenders to handle foreclosure proceedings, alleging violations of Consumer Collection Practices Act and the Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, mg' sought class certification. The Circuit Court, County, L. Ralph , J., certified the class. Parties appealed. The District Court of Appeal, 896 So.2d 773, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. Law rum sought review on ground of direct conflict. + +Holding: The Supreme Court, Anstead, J., held that litigation privilege applies in all causes of action whether for common-law torts or statutory viol tions. + +Decision of District Court of Appeal q + +Pariente, J., concurred and fi which Cantero, J., concurred. + +Wells, J., concurred in part, dis' and filed opinion. + +Bell, l., concurred ja,pa dissented in part + +tes + +### Action 13 + +### 13 Acti + +131 Grounds and Conditions Precedent 13k12 k. Defenses in General. Most Cited Cases + +379 Tons 3791 In General 379kI20 Defenses and Mitigating Circumstances + +379k122 lc Litigation Privije T Witness Immunity. Most Cited Cases + +Litigation privilege applies of action, whether for common-law t r statutory violations. + +\*380 John Beranek of ahassee, FL, Michae Golden of Marshall, and Goggin, T , Tallirney and Dale T. ey, Warner, Coleman r Petitioners. + +M. S id K. Went. elly Overstreet M, Daynniferjaggsprdner of Broad and cc, FL, a J. Guilday, Claude awn asith of Huey, Guilday, and a, Tallahassee, FL, + +#### (;STEAD, J. + +Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, & Frappier, et al., seek review of the decision of the First District f Appeal in rgardarria, McCalla, Raymer. & Frappier v. 896 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal, Boca Investors Group. Inc. v. Potash. 835 So.2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), on a question of law. We have jurisdiction. See art. V. § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We limit our review to the question of law upon which jurisdiction was granted, and hold that the litigation privilege applies in all causes of \*381 action, statutory as well as common law. Accordingly, we quash the contrary decision of the First District and remand for further proceedings consistent with our holding. + +#### Facts and Procedural History + +This case was presented to the district court un- + +Page 2 + +der the limited circumstances of an interlocutory review of a trial court's order certifying the case for class action status. The First District explained the underlying facts giving rise to this action in its decision below: + +The plaintiffs are property owners who defaulted on their mortgages with their respective lenders. The Echevarria firm, one of the defendants below, was the primary firm retained by the lenders to handle the foreclosure proceedings against the plaintiffs. Echevarria sent reinstatement letters to the plaintiffs at the outset of the foreclosure proceedings, stating that the plaintiffs were in default on their respective mortgages and faced foreclosure unless they reinstated the mortgages by bringing their payments up to date. The letters further claimed that the plaintiffs owed certain costs incurred by the lenders in the course of the proceedings. Nabors and Otis Pye, the original plaintiffs in this action, both had defaulted on their respective mortgages and received reinstatement letters from Echevarria. Neither reinstated their mortgage, and their properties were ultimately foreclosed. + +Nabors and Pye filed suit against Echevarria and the other named defendants, alleging that the firm had violated the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act and the Florida Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The essence of the complaint was that the defendants acted unlawfully by asserting a claim for a debt that was in excess of the actual costs their clients incurred during the foreclosure proceedings. Specifically, the plaintiffs argued that the reinstatement letter claimed costs of \$325 for title search and examination and various other charges for service of process, when the only cost incurred by the firm was \$55 for the title search. + +In response, the defendants asserted that the \$325 charge was legitimate, as it included \$150 for a title search and \$175 for a title examination performed by their in-house staff. They further argued that they had not violated either of the + +statutes referred to in the complaint because their contracts with their lender clients authorized them to charge these amounts. + +.... + +Nabors had previously received a reinstatement letter from Echevarria regarding the potential foreclosure of his mortgage, and as a result, paid the disputed amounts to reinstate his mortgage. On November 13, 2000, Cole, Nabors and Pye moved for leave to file a third amended complaint to assert [REDACTED] tutory claim. + +.... + +Later, [REDACTED], as the putative class representative, filed a motion to certify a class that consisted of "all persons from whom the defendants have filed foreclosure actions and claimed, attempted or threatened to collect costs in the collection of a 'consumer debt,' as that term is defined in 559.55(1), Florida Statutes, which were in excess of the amount allowed or authorized by law" for the four years prior to the filing of the initial complaint through the present. He subsequently filed an amended motion for class certification seeking to define the class as all persons in Florida to whom the defendants sent reinstatement letters or against whom they had filed a \*382 foreclosure action as counsel for a lender or mortgagee for the period of July 6, 1994, through June 30, 2001. + +The trial court granted the plaintiffs amended motion to certify the class action, and concluded that [REDACTED] was an appropriate class representative under rule 1.220, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. In the certification order, the trial court defined the class as all persons in Florida to whom the Echevarria firms sent reinstatement letters between July 6, 1994, and June 30, 2001, seeking to collect amounts for (1) a title search or examination exceeding the firms' actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred to a third-party vendor; (2) service of process; and (3) fees or + +Page 3 + +costs that had not been incurred at the time the firms sent the reinstatement letter. However, the court limited the class to those persons whose default or failure to timely pay their mortgage obligations did not ultimately result in a foreclosure judgment or sale. + +*Echevarria*, 896 So.2d at 774-75 (footnotes omitted). In appealing the trial court's decision to the First District, █ argued that the class definition was too narrow because it excluded property owners who received a reinstatement letter but who then failed to reinstate their mortgage, leading to a foreclosure judgment or sale of their properties. *Id.* at 775-76. + +█ asserted that an action under the Consumer Collection Practices Act does not depend on whether the underlying debt is valid, owed, paid, or reduced to judgment since the right to bring a suit under the Act arises from the debt collector's conduct in collecting the debt and whether the conduct involves unscrupulous debt collection practices. *Id.* at 776. The trial judge seemingly agreed with █ that the class should include everyone who received a reinstatement letter; the class certification order stated both that it was irrelevant whether the prospective class member reinstated the mortgage and that the mere transmission of the letter impacted all class members similarly. *Id.* Nevertheless, despite its explicit finding that "the violation of the Consumer Collection Practices Act is triggered by the transmission of the reinstatement letter seeking illegitimate costs, not by the ultimate outcome of any foreclosure proceedings," the trial court limited the class to include only those whose failure to pay their mortgage obligations did not result in a foreclosure judgment or sale. *Id.* + +In attempting to reconcile the discussions on the record from the trial court's hearing with the trial court's statements in the final order regarding the significance of an actual foreclosure judgment, the First District concluded that the trial court's inclusion of this qualifier in the class definition was a misstatement. *Id.* The First District further held + +that, if it was not a misstatement, the trial court's decision to limit the class size in such a manner was plain error under both the trade practices and the collection statutes because there was no legal justification for such a limitation. *Id.* + +Echevarria asserted that the trial court limited the class in an attempt to avoid the implications of a possible litigation privilege bar to those claimants involved in judicial mortgage foreclosure actions. *Id.* The First District rejected that argument, finding that the litigation privilege did not apply to the instant case because the suit was initiated as a statutory cause of action. *Id.* at 777. The court below reasoned that the litigation privilege has traditionally been reserved only for common law tort actions such as libel, defamation and fraud. *Id.* at 776-77. Then, invoking a separation of powers analysis, the court stated that "a judicially created policy such as the judicial 383 immunity rule must not be used to limit the application of a legislatively created, statutory cause of action." *Id.* at 777. Thus, the First District concluded that "the judicially created judicial immunity rule cannot be applied as a bar to the statutory causes of action in this case." *Id.* + +#### Litigation Privilege + +Echevarria now appeals to this Court, citing conflict with the Third District's decision in *Boca Investors* as to the application of the litigation privilege in proceedings involving statutory causes of action. *Boca Investors* initially involved a suit for tortious interference with a business relationship; however, the plaintiffs later moved to amend their original complaint to add a "statutory anti-trust claim." 835 So.2d at 274-75. The trial court dismissed the case and denied the motion to amend, citing this Court's decision in *Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, █, Mayes Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.*, 639 So.2d 606 (Fla.1994), for the proposition that absolute immunity is properly afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding. *Boca Investors*, 835 So.2d at 274. The Third District sub- + +Page 4 + +sequently upheld the trial court's dismissal, including the rejection of the amendment, finding "such a [statutory] claim is also based on statements covered by the litigation privilege. *See Burton [v. Salzberg, 725 So.2d 450, 451* (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ]." *Boca Investors*, 835 So.2d at 275. Thus, in a case where a statutory antitrust claim was asserted, the Third District explicitly acknowledged that the litigation privilege could be invoked. Because the First District's decision below, holding that the litigation privilege cannot be invoked when a statutory claim is being litigated, is in direct and express conflict with the Third District's holding in *Boca Investors*, we accepted jurisdiction and now resolve the conflict. FN1 + +FN1. The parties have raised numerous other issues both in the briefs and at oral argument which go well beyond the conflict issue, including, for example, an issue as to the point at which the litigation privilege may first be asserted. As we emphasized in our jurisdictional order, we granted jurisdiction in this case to consider only the conflicting holdings on the application of the litigation privilege. + +#### Analysis + +In *Myers v. Hodges*, 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357 (1907), this Court recognized the principle of the litigation privilege in Florida, essentially providing legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings. In that case, involving a libel suit based on statements contained in a complaint, this Court established a qualified litigation privilege, requiring that the alleged defamatory statements be relevant to the judicial proceeding. *Id.* at 361-2. Under our holding, once this threshold showing was met, the statements were entitled to immunity. *Id.* + +We most recently applied the litigation privilege in *Levin*. In that case, the Eleventh Circuit certified a question to this Court, asking whether Florida's litigation privilege protects the act of certifying to a trial court an intent to call opposing counsel as a witness at trial in order to obtain coun- + +sel's disqualification, and later failing to subpoena and call that person as a witness, from a claim of tortious interference with a business relationship. 639 So.2d at 607. Answering in the affirmative, we extended the litigation privilege to all torts, finding that "absolute immunity must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the act involves a defamatory statement or other tortious behavior ... so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding." *Id.* at 608. \*384 We reasoned that the justification behind immunizing defamatory statements applies equally to "other misconduct occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding." *Id.* We concluded the opinion by noting that adequate remedies still exist for misconduct in a judicial proceeding, most notably the trial court's contempt power, as well as the disciplinary measures of the state court system and bar association. *Id.* at 608-09. Notably, our holding was without qualification as to the nature of the judicial proceedings, whether based on common law, statutory authority, or otherwise. FN2 + +FN2. In addition to numerous traditional defamation claims, courts in Florida have applied *Levin* to uphold the use of the privilege in such diverse actions as civil conspiracy and tortious conduct in interfering with custody and visitation rights. *See Van Horn v. McNabb*, 715 So.2d 380, 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ("It is clear, from the face of the complaint, that Van Horn enjoys absolute immunity from any alleged defamation or other tortious act done in the course of the prior judicial proceeding."); *Rushing v. Bosse*, 652 So.2d 869, 875-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (affirming a dismissal for a count of civil conspiracy, citing to *Levin* and holding that "absolute immunity would be afforded to any conduct occurring during the course of the adoption proceeding, regardless of whether the conduct involved a defamatory statement or other tortious behavior, including a violation of rule 2.060(d) because signing the petition for + +Page 5 + +adoption ... has some relation to the adoption proceeding"). + +*Levin* plainly establishes that "[t]he rationale behind the immunity afforded to defamatory statements is equally applicable to *other misconduct* occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding." 639 So.2d at 608 (emphasis supplied). Importantly, the policy reasons for adopting a rule of immunity for actions taken in judicial proceedings focus on the judicial nature of the proceedings, not whether they were initiated under common law or statute. It is the perceived necessity for candid and unrestrained communications in those proceedings, free of the threat of legal actions predicated upon those communications, that is at the heart of the rule. The nature of the underlying dispute simply does not matter. Hence, the rationale upon which we relied in extending the litigation immunity privilege to all tortious causes of action likewise applies to a statutory cause of action: "Just as participants in litigation must be free to engage in unhindered communication, so too must those participants be free to use their best judgment in prosecuting or defending a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for misconduct." *Id.* + +We see no reason why this rationale would be limited by whether the misconduct constitutes a common-law tort or a statutory violation. The litigation privilege applies across the board to actions in Florida, both to common-law causes of action, those initiated pursuant to a statute, or of some other origin. "Absolute immunity must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding ... so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding." *Id.* + +#### Conclusion + +Given the precedent established by *Levin*, we hold that the litigation privilege applies in all causes of action, whether for common-law torts or statutory violations. Accordingly, we approve the decision in *Boca Investors*, quash the decision of the First District herein, and remand for further pro- + +ceedings consistent herewith. + +It is so ordered. + +██████████, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur. + +\*385 PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion, in which CANTERO, J., concurs. + +WELLS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion. + +BELL, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. + +PARIENTE, J., concurring. + +I agree with the majority's resolution of the conflict issue. I also agree with the majority's decision not to address the other issues raised by the parties, including whether the litigation privilege covers the reinstatement letters at issue in this case. However, as Justice Wells notes, this is a threshold issue that requires a determination of whether the letters were sent "in the due course of the judicial proceedings or as necessarily preliminary thereto." Concurring in part, dissenting in part opinion at 385 (quoting *Ange v. State*, 98 Fla. 538, 123 So. 916, 917 (1929)). Although the First District stated that "Echevarria sent reinstatement letters to the plaintiffs at the outset of the foreclosure proceedings," *Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, ██████████ & Frappier v. ██████████*, 896 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), the First District did not address whether the letters were, in fact, sent "in the due course of" or as "necessarily preliminary" to the foreclosure action. Rather, the First District ruled that the litigation privilege did not apply because the lawsuit was initiated as a statutory cause of action. *See id.* at 777. Now that this Court has held that the privilege is applicable in litigation based on both common law and statutory causes of action, the First District should consider on remand whether the privilege covers the reinstatement letters sent in this case. + +CANTERO, J., concurs. + +WELLS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. + +The majority opinion resolves the conflict regarding whether Florida's litigation privilege may be applied as a bar to statutory causes of action by + +approving the Third District Court of Appeal's decision in *Boca Investors Group, Inc. v. Potash*, 835 So.2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), and quashing the First District Court of Appeal's decision in *Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, [REDACTED] & Frappier v. [REDACTED]*, 896 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). However, the majority does not answer the more fundamental question of whether the litigation privilege extends to cover the reinstatement letters at issue in *Echevarria*. If the litigation privilege does not cover these letters, it is immaterial whether the plaintiffs' cause of action is derived from statute or common law. I write separately to clarify that in my view, Florida's litigation privilege does not extend to the reinstatement letters. It would be a waste of judicial resources to not answer this question while *Echevarria* is before the Court. + +In *Ange v. State*, 98 Fla. 538, 123 So. 916 (1929), the Court explained that the litigation privilege "extends to the protection of the judge, parties, counsel, and witnesses, and arises immediately upon the doing of any act required or permitted by law in the due course of the judicial proceedings or as necessarily preliminary thereto." *Ange*, 123 So. at 917. FN3 In \*386Levin, *Middlebrooks, Mabie, [REDACTED], Mayes & Mitchell, P.A., v. United States Fire Insurance Co.*, 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla.1994), the Court reiterated that the litigation privilege "must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding." + +FN3. In *Fridovich v. Fridovich*, 598 So.2d 65, 69 (Fla.1992), the Court receded in part from *Ange*, explaining: + +We thus hold, as a majority of the other states have held in this context, that defamatory statements voluntarily made by private individuals to the police or the state's attorney prior to the institution of criminal charges are presumptively qualifiedly privileged. We therefore recede from *Ange* and *Robertson [v. Industrial Insurance Company, 75 So.2d 198 (Fla.1954),]* to the extent they are incon- + +sistent with our ruling today. + +(Footnotes omitted.) However, importantly, the Court reaffirmed *Ange's* crucial holding that the litigation privilege arises upon the doing of any act necessarily preliminary to a judicial proceeding. *Id.* at 66. + +In the instant case, the majority rightfully declines to address at what point "a judicial proceeding" begins for purposes of the litigation privilege because it is unnecessary to do so given the facts of this case. Majority op. at 383 n. 1. The reinstatement letters sent by *Echevarria* were not a required condition precedent to foreclosure proceedings and were not related to the prosecution or defense of a foreclosure suit. Thus, the reinstatement letters are not covered by the litigation privilege. + +Florida courts have previously addressed what statements are "necessarily preliminary" to judicial proceedings. The Fourth District Court of Appeal helpfully explained that publications necessarily preliminary to judicial proceedings include presuit communications that are required by statute or by contract as a condition precedent to suit. *Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.*, 432 So.2d 1323, 1326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). More recently, this Court considered whether voluntary statements made prior to the instigation of criminal charges should be protected by the litigation privilege. See *Fridovich*, 598 So.2d at 66. The Court held that while statements compelled by investigatory subpoena are absolutely privileged, voluntary statements to police are only qualifiedly privileged. The Court also noted that voluntary statements to private individuals are not privileged at all. *Fridovich*, 598 So.2d at 69 & nn. 7-8. + +The reinstatement letters at issue were not a statutory or contractual prerequisite to foreclosure. As noted in *Pledger*, Florida law requires a plaintiff to send notice before filing a complaint in certain types of actions. For example, section 766.106, Florida Statutes (2006), requires a medical malprac- + +Page 7 + +tice claimant to notify each prospective defendant by mail prior to filing a complaint. Medical malpractice litigation arguably "begins" when this notification is sent. + +Here, no statute or contract provision required Echevarria to send borrowers reinstatement information in order to proceed with foreclosure. The First District stated: + +Echevarria sent reinstatement letters to the plaintiffs at the outset of the foreclosure proceedings, stating that the plaintiffs were in default on their respective mortgages and faced foreclosure unless they reinstated the mortgages by bringing their payments up to date. + +*Echevarria*, 896 So.2d at 774. This statement should not be read to mean that the reinstatement letters were sent "in the due course of" foreclosure litigation or "necessarily preliminary" to it. Such a reading is not supported by the record. In actuality, the reinstatement letters did not refer to foreclosure proceedings.FN4 Mr. Echevarria testified that reinstatement letters were not sent to every borrower facing foreclosure. Rather, the letters containing the allegedly unlawful claim were sent in response to borrower requests for information regarding the possibility of reinstating the mortgage. + +FN4. Echevarria's letter to class representative █ never uses the word "foreclosure," except that it is signed by "Haelee Holjes Foreclosure Paralegal." + +\*387 In terms we used in *Ange*, the reinstatement letters were not statements "required or permitted by law in the due course of the judicial proceedings," nor were the letters sent because they were legally necessary in order to prosecute foreclosures. The letters were relevant only to reinstatement of the mortgages. The letters did not become part of a judicial proceeding simply because they were sent by a law firm. If the letters contained statements which were in violation of the law, it should make no difference whether the letters were + +sent by the bank or the bank's lawyers. The litigation privilege as this Court has defined it would not insulate either the bank or the bank's lawyers from liability for the unlawful statements. + +The policy reasoning underlying the litigation privilege indicates that the privilege was not intended to preclude actions based on any misrepresentations contained in these reinstatement letters. In *Levin*, the Court explained that Florida's litigation privilege "resulted from the balancing of two competing interests: the right of an individual to enjoy a reputation unimpaired by defamatory attacks versus the right of the public interest to a free and full disclosure of facts in the conduct of judicial proceedings." *Levin*, 639 So.2d at 608. The Court held that absolute immunity must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding because: + +Just as participants in litigation must be free to engage in unhindered communication, so too must those participants be free to use their best judgment in prosecuting or defending a lawsuit without fear of having to defend their actions in a subsequent civil action for misconduct. + +*Id.* The Court designed the privilege to ensure litigants' freedom of advocacy without leaving victims of tortious conduct without remedy by restricting the litigation privilege to acts occurring during the course of judicial proceedings. Victims of torts committed during judicial proceedings are protected by the trial judge's contempt power and the Court's authority to discipline members of The Florida Bar. *Id.* + +But when communications are separate from pending litigation and are not necessary in order to pursue future litigation, tort victims do not have the benefit of these judicial safeguards. Therefore, the litigation privilege should not be structured so as to deprive those who are intended to have the protection of law in respect to the communications from having that protection. Recipients of misleading or fraudulent reinstatement letters must be able to en- + +force Florida's Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) and Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), the statutory bases of the causes of action pleaded in Echevarria, for relief. To not allow such enforcement would be an unintended and unstated consequence of the litigation privilege. + +In short, the reinstatement letters currently at issue were nonadversarial communications between private individuals. As noted above, this Court has emphasized that the litigation privilege does not apply to voluntary presuit statements made by private individuals to private individuals. See Fridovich. 598 So.2d at 69 n. 8. Thus, the litigation privilege does not bar a civil suit based on these letters, regardless of whether that suit is statutory or common law in nature. + +Fla.,2007. Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, + +950 So.2d 380, 32 Fla. L. Weekly S64 + +END OF DOCUMENT + +& Frappier v. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c97d64770e2a0df88098a3812db39ac3e1cb94b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928/EFTA02769928.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2078 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769928.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 39, + "chars": 79114, + "elapsed_seconds": 21.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 302.06399999999996, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 64.80000000000001 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 302.06399999999996, + 106.11000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ASSERT A CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.30200000000002, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 429.95399999999995, + 340.2 + ], + [ + 429.95399999999995, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 169.30200000000002, + 366.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 63.336, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 199.143, + 490.86 + ], + [ + 199.143, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 63.336, + 504.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Epstein's Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 101.369, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 231.26699999999997, + 419.58000000000004 + ], + [ + 231.26699999999997, + 434.988037109375 + ], + [ + 101.369, + 434.988037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "13. Summary of the Argument", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 147.33399999999997 + ], + [ + 262.8598937988281, + 147.33399999999997 + ], + [ + 262.8598937988281, + 161.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 161.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.306, + 91.982 + ], + [ + 340.8447265625, + 91.982 + ], + [ + 340.8447265625, + 106.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 264.306, + 106.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. THE PROFERRED FACTS ESTABLISH THAT CONDUCT \nCOULD NOT POSSIBLY FORM THE BASIS OF ANY LIABILITY IN FAVOR OF \nEPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 114.77399999999999 + ], + [ + 538.9251708984375, + 114.77399999999999 + ], + [ + 538.9251708984375, + 156.853515625 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 156.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Was Simply Not Involved in the Rothstein Ponzi Sc me", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 248.26999999999998 + ], + [ + 450.65999999999997, + 248.26999999999998 + ], + [ + 450.65999999999997, + 264.103515625 + ], + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 264.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Epstein Did Not Suffer Any Harm from Allegedly Fraudulent Presentations to \nInvestors.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 91.28 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 91.28 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 121.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 102.31200000000001, + 121.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ON'Enstein's Allegations Against Were and Are Unfounded and Not \n\\ Actionable in Any Event.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 571.3149999999999 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 571.3149999999999 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 601.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 99.87600000000002, + 601.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\\ \\/1\nD. Was Properly Pursuing., terests of His Three Clients Who Had \nBeen Sexually Abused by Epstylfi '", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.92099999999999, + 360.1759338378906 + ], + [ + 537.7470000000001, + 360.1759338378906 + ], + [ + 537.7470000000001, + 394.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 102.92099999999999, + 394.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. EPSTEIN'S LAWSUIT LACKED ANY LEGITIMATE PURPOSE FROM \nTHE OUTSET BECAUSE OF HIS REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN \nREASONABLE DISCOVERY.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 505.6416320800781, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 505.6416320800781, + 217.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 217.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "intimi 11111 IV. ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCSAROM EPSTEIN'S \nF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.556, + 248.13934326171875 + ], + [ + 538.8323974609375, + 248.13934326171875 + ], + [ + 538.8323974609375, + 329.14813232421875 + ], + [ + 65.556, + 329.14813232421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.582, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 346.0791320800781, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 346.0791320800781, + 218.22802734375 + ], + [ + 258.582, + 218.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 377.4114685058594, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 377.4114685058594, + 107.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 227.01799999999997, + 107.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.272, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 154.43200000000002, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 154.43200000000002, + 107.9730224609375 + ], + [ + 66.272, + 107.9730224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.166, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 405.2047119140625, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 405.2047119140625, + 118.353515625 + ], + [ + 205.166, + 118.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. OR IN \nTHE ALTERNATIVE. MOTION TO DIRECT PARTIES' BACK TO MEDIATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.116, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 496.89471435546875, + 285.12 + ], + [ + 496.89471435546875, + 311.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 114.116, + 311.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 29, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.49, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 360.57, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 360.57, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 251.49, + 481.95000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Certificate of Service", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.49, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 358.7893981933594, + 103.68 + ], + [ + 358.7893981933594, + 118.3485107421875 + ], + [ + 251.49, + 118.3485107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Westlaw", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.984, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 125.97061157226562, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 125.97061157226562, + 79.391357421875 + ], + [ + 67.984, + 79.391357421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Torts 379 e=122", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 389.9403076171875, + 132.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 389.9403076171875, + 144.33758544921875 + ], + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 144.33758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Action 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.984, + 546.75 + ], + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 546.75 + ], + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 560.2176055908203 + ], + [ + 67.984, + 560.2176055908203 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "13 Acti", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.984, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 111.08099999999999, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 111.08099999999999, + 581.9575958251953 + ], + [ + 67.984, + 581.9575958251953 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(;STEAD, J.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 369.53033447265625, + 405.0 + ], + [ + 369.53033447265625, + 418.08758544921875 + ], + [ + 307.74899999999997, + 418.08758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Facts and Procedural History", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 350.84599999999995, + 602.64 + ], + [ + 482.0372619628906, + 602.64 + ], + [ + 482.0372619628906, + 615.7176055908203 + ], + [ + 350.84599999999995, + 615.7176055908203 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Litigation Privilege", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 372.698, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 457.07099999999997, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 457.07099999999997, + 403.38 + ], + [ + 372.698, + 403.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Analysis", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.56, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 197.556, + 401.76 + ], + [ + 197.556, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 157.56, + 413.09999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Conclusion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.357, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 203.952, + 520.83 + ], + [ + 203.952, + 531.36 + ], + [ + 152.357, + 531.36 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 7 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 166 + ], + [ + "Line", + 87 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769928" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..498c2bdfd608b810637e21bc89d7ae2b6350951c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, +vs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION +FOR LEAVE TO USE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED UNDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT** + +SHARON R. BOCK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL PRACTICE +FL + +FILED + +THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on July 13, 2011, upon Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Leave to Use Documents Produced Under Confidentiality Agreement. The Court having reviewed the Motion, hearing argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Leave to Use Documents Produced Under Confidentiality Agreement is hereby Granted by agreement of counsel. *2x* + +**DONE AND ORDERED** this 13th day of July, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +*Melvin Dassel* +DAVID F. [REDACTED] +Circuit Judge + +Copies furnished: +All Counsel on Attached Service List + +Epstein v Rothstein, etc. + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Epstein M-Leave to Use Docs Produced Under Confidentiality Agreement + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800)COLYMBAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 CO + +Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .49 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +AS + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +G. Weinberg, Esq.'7 \* 20 Park Plaza, Suite 4100 Suffolk, 02116 N- \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d7fe4682a185eca33d4baee0983d5c47169a413c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967/EFTA02769967.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769967.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2070, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.4, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 315.462, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 315.462, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO USE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED UNDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 526.785, + 303.75 + ], + [ + 526.785, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 65.77199999999999, + 346.68 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.96800000000002, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 345.3669128417969, + 144.99 + ], + [ + 345.3669128417969, + 159.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 255.96800000000002, + 159.3580322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769967" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46719ced3572350e644c17a9fd605832329f3bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800X=MBAG + +## ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL J. MOTION TO DISMISS P MN F, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED COMPLAINT + +\* 1 THIS CAUSE havini&ne before rt on July 13, 2011, upon Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff, J. Moti ass Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Complaint served Apri 1 20 1, in the above-styled cause. The Court having reviewed the Motion, hearing ar ounsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND AD fendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff/Co fendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Complaint is hereby Granted. PlaintifUCoun -Defen ant, Jeffrey Epstein shall have thirty (30) days from July 13, 2011, i.e., August 12, 201 e an Amended Complaint. + +DONE ANICISTERED this 1 t day of July, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach CountyOda. + +Copies furnished: + +All Counsel on Attached Service List + +DAV D F. Circ it J dge Epstein v Rothstein, Case No. 22191cA040800XXXXMBAG Order on M/Dismiss Epstein's Am Complaint + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800)OOOOi1BAG + +L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suit West Palm Beach, Florida 33401/1 + +G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, ■ **02116** + +**cos** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f58d326810e67479b74c3298a04539bcb5bef04 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969/EFTA02769969.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769969.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1909, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.86, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PL \nJ. MOTION TO DISMISS P MN F, JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN'S AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.26, + 314.93 + ], + [ + 465.90399169921875, + 314.93 + ], + [ + 465.90399169921875, + 357.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 127.26, + 357.99249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.52, + 145.78199999999998 + ], + [ + 343.61181640625, + 145.78199999999998 + ], + [ + 343.61181640625, + 161.30352783203125 + ], + [ + 254.52, + 161.30352783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769969" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e15fbeb68edb358317275922c0c4a54e76a0bcc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +FILED +2011 JUL 25 PM 1:34 +MARON R. BOCK, CLERK +STAR BEACH CIRCUIT COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT COUNTY 5 + +**ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS +MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES** + +**THIS CAUSE**, having come before the Court on July 13, 2011, upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. Edwards' Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages. The Court having reviewed the Motion, hearing argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages is hereby Denied without prejudice. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** this 13th day of July, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copies furnished: +All Counsel on attached Service List + +Epstein v Rothstein, M, etc. Case No. aaaCA 040800XXXXMBAG Order on M/for Leave to Assert Punitive Damage Claims + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA040800XXXIMBAG + +901 Point West 4.4 L. Ackerman, Esq. Burnett, P.A. 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +C5 1.) ? + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P 250 Australian Avenue, South, S West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 0211pS \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17c30d000d780f2b0d57c5963d75e78f13b0836e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971/EFTA02769971.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769971.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1949, + "elapsed_seconds": 43.98, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 312.696, + 74.79599999999999 + ], + [ + 535.0980000000001, + 74.79599999999999 + ], + [ + 535.0980000000001, + 117.07199999999997 + ], + [ + 312.696, + 117.07199999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, [REDACTED] J. EDWARDS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.87, + 309.75300000000004 + ], + [ + 502.98, + 309.75300000000004 + ], + [ + 502.98, + 338.20799999999997 + ], + [ + 87.87, + 338.20799999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.52, + 152.405 + ], + [ + 343.9562683105469, + 152.405 + ], + [ + 343.9562683105469, + 167.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 254.52, + 167.86248779296875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769971" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ea7150e3acb02d8071fe5b6520a3adc9e0c9b47 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, +vs. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, +individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED +MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATING TO EXTRA JUDICIAL +STATEMENTS SERVED ON ██████████ Y 2, 2011** + +**THIS CAUSE**, having come before the Court on July 13, 2011, upon Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Motion for Protective Order Relating to Extra Judicial Statements served on May 2, 2011. The Court having reviewed the Motion, hearing argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Motion for Protective Order Relating to Extra Judicial Statements served on May 2, 2011, is hereby Denied without prejudice. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** this 13rd day of July, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +![]()Copies furnished: +All Counsel on attached Service List + +**CALL JUL 25 PM 1:30 +STANDARD R. BOCK CLEARED +OALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 +SEARCHED +SERIALIZED +INDEXED +FILED +APR 20 2011** + +L. Ackerman, Esq. + +Burnett, P.A. + +901 Point West + +777 South Hagler Drive + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. + +Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik + +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. + +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, + +250 Australian Avenue, S + +West Palm Beach, F rida + +G. we + +20 Park P1 + +Suffolk, + +Epstein v Rothstein, etc. + +SO 2009 CA 0408003OOOO.411AG + +Order on Epstein's Amended MPO Relating to Extra Judicial Statements 5/2/11 + +## SERVICE LIST + +Epstein v Rothstein - 502009CA0408002OOIXAMAG A + +O \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8fdccd5b718515b6c4b7ed9b5c35752f358f210 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973/EFTA02769973.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769973.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2110, + "elapsed_seconds": 149.39, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 311.48400000000004, + 73.08 + ], + [ + 535.0980000000001, + 73.08 + ], + [ + 535.0980000000001, + 116.11599999999999 + ], + [ + 311.48400000000004, + 116.11599999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATING TO EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENTS SERVED ON \u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588\u2588 Y 2, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.842, + 295.568 + ], + [ + 527.22, + 295.568 + ], + [ + 527.22, + 336.97999999999996 + ], + [ + 64.842, + 336.97999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.308, + 184.55100000000002 + ], + [ + 343.6312561035156, + 184.55100000000002 + ], + [ + 343.6312561035156, + 199.99249267578125 + ], + [ + 253.308, + 199.99249267578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769973" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b94d466b638b6099e9aa1949ca399efb92a81f4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.md @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +v S. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +\ ACIC/9 + +Defendant, + +SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARD14/ FFER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ASgeRc C AIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +CO + +c#3 \*\* Ss. In + +J. , by an is undersigned counsel, files the attached Response to Request for Prod do served June 9, 2011, and the Request which demonstrates that Epstein does not ha I has never had any documentary support for his contention that a itifI. had kn dge ut Rothstein's commission of or attempt to commit any fraud prior to the pub i disc sure of Rothstein's criminal conduct. The only documents referenced in respo request for production provide no support for any claim asserted by Epstein against + +Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attac I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by his t er lity of July, 20A + +Case Ho.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Supplement to Proffer in Support of + +Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages + +Page 2 of 3 + +a + +ar No.: 169440 + +Denney Scarola rt Shipley, P.A. + +9 Palm Beach Lake oul and + +West Palm Beach, 409 + +Phone: (561) 686443 + +Fax: (561) 8 -94 1 + +Attorneys\ J. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Supplement to [REDACTED] Proffer in Support of +Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages +Page 3 of 3 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561) 659-8300 +Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 524-2820 +Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954) 745-5849 +Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +Fowler White Burnett, P.A. +901 Phillips Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561) 802-9044 +Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +# IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +# CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +### PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRET E t IN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION SER 9, 2011 + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned \'7-. counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Response to the Request for P r"! du tie m- from the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, J. (`a), Reque for Production Served June 9, 2011, and would state as follows: \_1 + +- 1. Since Eps ti' as not be able, due in large part to the objections of to obtain all relevl ocum ts that would reflect, suggest, or relate to knowledge of Rothstein's , it is not possible to to produce all documents responsive to this request. However,-exhibits to the deposition of A.J. Discala, ICretsclunar, and Michael Legamaro due fit and are responsive to this request. In addition, the documents that are exhibits to Epstein's Motion to Use Confidential Documents are also responsive. + - 2. See Response to Number 1 above. + - 3. Undetermined at this time. + +4. Objection. Work product. See Grinnel Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Boulevard Limited, 924 So 2d 887 (Fla. 4ih DCA 2006). + +5. Objection. Work product. See Grinnel Corp. v. Palms 2100 Ocean Boulevard Limited, 924 So 2d 887 (Fla. 4h DCA 2006). + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing w mailed this /1 /614 of July, 2011 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldber iss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334 ; arc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola et al. P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409; and Suite 1000, Suffolk, 02116. alm Beach Lakes Boulevard, einberg, Esq., 20 Park Plaza, + +y submitted, + +seph L Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +# PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TOJEFFREY EPSTEIN + +Defendant/Counterplaintiff, J. Edwards by and through his undersigned counsel, requests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit J. to inspect and copy each of the following documents\*: + +- 1. Any and all documents\* reflecting, relating to, or suggesting that bad knowledge about Rothstein a commission of or attempt to commit any fraud prior to the public disclosure of Rothstein's criminal conduct. +- 2. I Any and all documents\* which in any way support the claim or claims that Epstein is pursuing against + - 3. All emails that Epstein intends to use or may use as a trial exhibit. +- 4. All documents\* that rebuts, refutes, and/or contradicts the claims Epstein is pursuing against + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800VOCXMBAG Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +5. Statements from anyone that in any way support the claims Epstein is pursuing against + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identica l' writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, y other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, ary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devi o reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as w ication metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of yo Pon technology (IT) systems--e.g., hardware, software and data, including bu t hp led to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDA I,p ones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and tools and protocols. + +It is requested than aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this request at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. + +=adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXIVEAG Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of June, 2011, + +Jack + +Flo ar o.: 1.9440 + +S y Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley + +Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +alm Beach, Florida 33409 + +At , (561) 686-6300 + +F • (561,-9451 + +ttomeys for J. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800,O0O(MBAG Request for Production to Jeffrey Epstein + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr.,re'q'uire Burnett, P. Attorrsr: Jeffreyastein 901 of 777 S Flagler Dri West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 + +**Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk,** ■ **02116 Phone:** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..859ce7223399a78ef4fc8cd372d86a6b73d1e87f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975/EFTA02769975.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,511 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769975.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 8304, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.5, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.981, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.8588256835938, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 535.8588256835938, + 117.05853271484375 + ], + [ + 309.981, + 117.05853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.22400000000005, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 352.64, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 352.64, + 157.14000000000001 + ], + [ + 260.22400000000005, + 157.14000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 152.25, + 38.07 + ], + [ + 470.8681945800781, + 38.07 + ], + [ + 470.8681945800781, + 67.47802734375 + ], + [ + 152.25, + 67.47802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CIVIL DIVISION \nCASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG \nJudge David F.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.143, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 422.49609375, + 80.19 + ], + [ + 422.49609375, + 124.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 199.143, + 124.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFRET E t IN'S RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF REQUEST FOR \nPRODUCTION SER 9, 2011", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.042, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 529.5146484375, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 529.5146484375, + 362.238037109375 + ], + [ + 84.042, + 362.238037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 313.12000000000006, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.7593994140625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 537.7593994140625, + 115.863037109375 + ], + [ + 313.12000000000006, + 115.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TOJEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 127.072, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 489.9716796875, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 489.9716796875, + 336.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 127.072, + 336.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.133, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 355.7212829589844, + 135.27 + ], + [ + 355.7212829589844, + 151.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 266.133, + 151.1080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769975" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bd2dc620b29e5c0e40cc8c168025bdedd9cd942 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, + +No. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMBAG + +J. [REDACTED], +Individually, and L.M., individually. +Defendants. + +**CORRECTED NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE** + +To clarify, the undersigned's appearance in this matter is, and has been since the filing of the motion seeking his *pro hac vice* admission in this case on March 14, 2011, limited solely to litigation regarding the validity of assertions of privilege by defendant Brad [REDACTED] which had commenced before Judge Carney and was to be continued in the above-captioned matter. + +I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 5 day of August, 2011. + +Respectfully submitted, + +*Martin J. Weinberg* +[REDACTED] G. Weinberg + +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Boston, Massachusetts 02116 +tel: (617) 227-3700 +fax: (617) 338-9538 + +SHARON R. BUCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 + +FILED + +11 AUG - 5 AM 10:43 + +**SERVICE LIST** + +Epstein v. Rothstein, [REDACTED], etc., et al. +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point – West Tower +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South +Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a25b63de438f80f3260d2167fe22d1ef777a93d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984/EFTA02769984.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769984.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1750, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 131.719, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 444.9309999999999, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 444.9309999999999, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 131.719, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CORRECTED NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.75, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 424.8999999999999, + 234.09 + ], + [ + 424.8999999999999, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 151.75, + 247.04999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SERVICE LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.545, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 347.27, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 347.27, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 259.545, + 84.24 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 127 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769984" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d9a41e783c56d49a371829ad349e01838487774 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, J. IMIM, individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Au t t eAg+ attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +/ + +### C ,' RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +\*Daces T suc 'S, + +0O + +- 001 > > X X/ CO CP rrl ie l ?7 n2 = ' + +## NAME AND ADDRESS + +Donnie 1242 SW Briarwood Dri Port St. Lucie, F 34986 + +CD E AND TIME September 7, 2011 10:30 AM. + +—1 + +-o + +## LOCATION + +Atlantic Reporting 201 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. #108 Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 + +# \*DUCES TEAM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +Any and all documents\*\* reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +- 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. for the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger + +including but not limited to documents reflecting when the services were performed, how long they were performed, the nature of the services, and by whom they were performed. + +upon oral examination before Atlantic Reporting, a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of August 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] + +cc: Atlantic Reporting + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, CONDENSED, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact, Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvilida que necesita algan acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 si usted tiene discapacitaciOn del oido o de la voz, Ilame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim bezwen akgacon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 si on gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." + +,, \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1edb7237773b4b930f6a9ef102a95bb8600f472a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986/EFTA02769986.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769986.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4202, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "C ,' \nRE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 193.662, + 328.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 416.624755859375, + 328.9381103515625 + ], + [ + 416.624755859375, + 351.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 193.662, + 351.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.08, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 203.999755859375, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 203.999755859375, + 467.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 73.08, + 467.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.81799999999998, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 345.30299999999994, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 345.30299999999994, + 466.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 244.81799999999998, + 466.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 384.279, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 457.6453552246094, + 453.6 + ], + [ + 457.6453552246094, + 467.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 384.279, + 467.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TEAM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF \nTHE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 66.99, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 541.282958984375, + 545.13 + ], + [ + 541.282958984375, + 578.4735412597656 + ], + [ + 66.99, + 578.4735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.762, + 74.612 + ], + [ + 351.48, + 74.612 + ], + [ + 351.48, + 88.39899999999999 + ], + [ + 258.762, + 88.39899999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 117 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769986" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce9afa8a3e47894017e248ed2ddcaf9a75f50d14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +██████████ J. ██████████, individually, +and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +FILED +2011 AUG 12 PH 3:27 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +**NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION** + +**\*Duces Tecum** + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +**NAME AND ADDRESS** + +**DATE AND TIME** + +**LOCATION** + +Representative(s) of The +Wackenhut Corporation with +the most knowledge of the +matters set forth below +pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. +1.310(b)(6) + +September 6, 2011 +10:00 AM. + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & +Shipley, PA +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +**\*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF +THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:** + +Any and all documents\*\* reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +1. 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +2. 2. for the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger + +including but not limited to documents reflecting when the services were performed, how +long they were performed, the nature of the services, and by whom they were performed. + +upon oral examination before Signature Court Reporting, Inc., a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +\*\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 11th day of August 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Scaroy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for Defendant [REDACTED] + +cc: Signature Court Reporting + +**E-TRANSCRIPT, ASCII, CD AND/OR DVD REQUESTED** + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED]; [REDACTED] +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +marc@nuriklaw.com +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 +Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7026a619db1dae9d8cf758a08a83d5a59b606ad1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990/EFTA02769990.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769990.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 4099, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.356, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 543.872, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 543.872, + 116.63999999999999 + ], + [ + 308.356, + 116.63999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.952, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 404.26199999999994, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 404.26199999999994, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 203.952, + 324.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 202.13099999999997, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 202.13099999999997, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 73.44699999999999, + 426.87000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DATE AND TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.586, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 342.34799999999996, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 342.34799999999996, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 241.586, + 426.87000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 355.70199999999994, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 425.5069999999999, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 425.5069999999999, + 426.87000000000006 + ], + [ + 355.70199999999994, + 426.87000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.984, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 541.444, + 537.84 + ], + [ + 541.444, + 568.62 + ], + [ + 67.984, + 568.62 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.216, + 79.968 + ], + [ + 350.175, + 79.968 + ], + [ + 350.175, + 93.84 + ], + [ + 258.216, + 93.84 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769990" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a912cba1c56fe63afe697fae40dae4ce9b18e257 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +**NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY** + +**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the undersigned attorney, [REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., files this Notice of Unavailability for the following dates: + +August 20, 2011 through and including September 1, 2011. + +1. The undersigned will be at hearings or depositions or immediate preparation on such dates, and requests otherwise refraining from taking actions which would require responses by the party represented by the undersigned during this period and from setting any other hearings, depositions or court appearances be set during such period. + +2. The filing and service of this Notice shall constitute an application and request for continuance, extension of time and/or a protective order, as appropriate, for such reason. + +3. The undersigned thanks opposing counsel for their courtesy in observing such unavailability. + +SHARING TO DOCUMENT CLERK'S +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 2 + +FILED + +11 AUG 12 AM 10:06 + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trgar and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via ❑ Email, O Facsimile, U.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this //nay of August, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +**Weinberg, Esquire G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, El 02116** + +eph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c1ae818ccdeb7c58293275d4205d4dd62b14c0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993/EFTA02769993.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769993.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2209, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 458.892, + 47.038 + ], + [ + 458.892, + 75.423 + ], + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 75.423 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.201, + 313.857 + ], + [ + 388.47999999999996, + 313.857 + ], + [ + 388.47999999999996, + 327.644 + ], + [ + 208.201, + 327.644 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 112.056 + ], + [ + 382.8459167480469, + 112.056 + ], + [ + 382.8459167480469, + 126.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 217.91299999999998, + 126.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769993" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b1b4b897116014ec47d52198ac52b929a5a20ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +2011 AUG 15 PM 4:41 +SHARON R. BOCK, (L) +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR +ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve His Second Amended Complaint. The grounds for this motion are as follows: + +1. 1. The case was initially filed on December 7, 2009. +2. 2. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett entered the case on an Order Granting Substitution of Counsel dated June 10, 2010. +3. 3. At the hearing in this matter on April 1, 2011, the Court ordered Epstein to amend his complaint, which was done. +4. 4. On July 13, 2011, the Court dismissed the Amended Complaint and gave the Plaintiff thirty (30) days to amend; i.e., up to any including August 12, 2011. +5. 5. The parties have conducted extensive settlement discussions in an effort to resolve this case and another related case without success. + +6. Epstein has engaged in reviewing other records which he believes are necessary for the Second Amended Complaint. A review of these records are extensive and time consuming. Since April 1, 2011, essentially all discOvery has been stayed by the Court. + +7. Due to the settlement efforts and the time necessary to conclude rev w of these additional records, together with unexpected emergencies in other matters th ye .sen, an additional ten (10) days arc necessary for counsel to complete and serve nd Amended Complaint. + +8. There is no prejudice to the Defendants on gra s enlargement because the case is not yet set for trial. + +9. Given the complexity of the cas r of documents that had to be reviewed, and the desire of the Plaintiff to the issues relating to privilege that may arise subsequent to the filing of this Sec nded Complaint, additional time is required. + +10. The undersigned coon certifies that this motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + + -- 11. The undersigned-funher certifies that he will endeavor to continue to make an effort to resolve this'matter without the need of a hearing. + +WHEREFORE' , Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein requests this Court to grant his Mot' for Enlargement of Time to Serve Second Amended Complaint by permitting Plaintiff to through and including August 22, 2011 to serve his Second Amended Complaint. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a trucand correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via rmai1,O Facsimile, f►**~'U.S. Mail,** ❑ Hand Delivery, ❑ Federal Express this JPffay of August, 201 1 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Weinberg, Esquire G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 + +Respectfully submitted, + +ep L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +o` + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (56 I ) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein + +W:130743V4OTEXT21-Motion (co Enlarpnem of Tiow to Serve Second Am Complainian.don \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b18e3d5368574b0d93a2429ebe8b16920147954a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995/EFTA02769995.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769995.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3815, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 458.892, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 458.892, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 144.46599999999998, + 70.47 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.871, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 508.0589999999999, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 508.0589999999999, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 92.871, + 336.15 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 107.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 383.1678161621094, + 107.6702880859375 + ], + [ + 383.1678161621094, + 121.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 218.02199999999996, + 121.0670166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769995" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d5c4dcaff6aafc67d1db7a944e86984eb377094 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. -, individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +/ + +## NOTICE OF HEARING- (U + +C co co, ng \_v + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersi d t down for heaiing begire the Honorable Honorable David , one of the J of t e above-styled Court, in Courtroom 9C at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 l i Dr ie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida on Thursday, August 18, 2011 at 8:45 a. , RA"Howing: + +## Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve His Second Amended Complaint + +I hereby certify tliat,),ve made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this motie or heating. + +PLE RN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +'aeordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355- 4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREB/ L CERTIFY that a tr and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnistigd via Email, O Facsimile, U.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this II t Jay of August, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 + +CLS Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ■ Weinberg, Esquire G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 c Suffolk, El 02116 + +psi) + +osep L. Ackerman, Jr. " LI Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29106fbdd6dc6b9b7678748c4a14fe197aacbdae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998/EFTA02769998.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02769998.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2130, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.87, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.564, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.0441589355469, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 461.0441589355469, + 71.30853271484375 + ], + [ + 145.564, + 71.30853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING- (U", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 213.21199999999996, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 386.56, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 386.56, + 324.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 213.21199999999996, + 324.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for \nEnlargement of Time to Serve His Second Amended Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 136.504, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 464.435791015625, + 445.5 + ], + [ + 464.435791015625, + 474.3580322265625 + ], + [ + 136.504, + 474.3580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.044, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 383.5378112792969, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 383.5378112792969, + 106.8170166015625 + ], + [ + 218.044, + 106.8170166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02769998" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f325d4772ba629762610dba0a25c4babcfff8de0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIRCUIT DIVISION + +CASE NO: 50209CA040500 +XXXX MBA6 + +Jeffrey Epstein +Plaintiff(s) + +vs. + +Scott Rothstein +Defendant(s) + +Birmoley J. EDWARDS + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +FILED + +2011 AUG 18 PM 4:00 + +ORDER GRANTING/DENIAL MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME + +THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Epstein Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Second Amended Complaint Issued At Address +Complaint Must Be Filed No Later than 5 PM August 22, 2011 + +and the Court having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said motion be, and the same is hereby GRANTED/DENIED + +Complaint Must Be Filed No Later than 5 PM. August 22, 2011. No Further Extensions, with he granted. + +HOME AND ORDERED in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida +this 18th day of [REDACTED] 20th + +*[Handwritten signature and notes: "Rent will not grant any Extensions."]* + +*[Handwritten signature of Jack Scandas]* + +France Jackson, 415 N. American Ave Suite 2, P.O. Box 33307 +Martin Weinberg 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Suite 200 Fla. 3301 +Jack Scandas, Searcy Denny, 2139 Palm Beach later Blvd West Palm Beach Fl. 33409 +Joseph Dureman, 777 S. Flayler Dr. Suite 901 West Palm Beach Fla 33401 +more plurik, Unc E. Browns Blvd. Suite 700 Fl. Langmode Fla. 33301 +Jack Scandas 250 Austinian Ave. S.O. Suite 1400 W. Palm Beach Fla 33401 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5452b87efe58e9761c562d697b10c2f2b3b00bfc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000/EFTA02770000.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770000.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1526, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.53, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIRCUIT DIVISION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.402, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 548.1, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 548.1, + 141.75 + ], + [ + 108.402, + 141.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER GRANTING/DENIAL MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.465, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 599.865, + 360.45000000000005 + ], + [ + 599.865, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 234.465, + 384.75 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770000" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2d606f4cece609a47e5bae21b2408a30aad6f00 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.md @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT''' r rX The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and J. ('. (collectively referred to as "ants") and alleges: + +" cc x, CD C . 27rn c -) • = 0co mo o C) 28. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in fe court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for fraud and racketeering, based on an alleged S1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his own. pockets, and those of his cohorts. enterprise. c esal government called RRA a criminal + +# COUNT I: giliZ allev OF PROCESS - + +29. Plaintiff realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 as if they were fully set forth here. + +30. made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process as follows: + +(a) On September 11, 2008, filed a state court action on behalf of client L.M. against seeking damages. On July 22, 2009, sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting. ' + +(b) On July 24, 2009, M, on behalf of client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV-81092. However, was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's last name so as not to alert the defendant that the case had been filed. Each of the one hundred and fifty-six counts (156) is a separate cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, which provides a civil remedy authorizing damages of no less than \$150,000 per violation. Thus, sought total damages in excess of Twenty-Three Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (\$23,400,000.00). knew or should have known that highly-charged sexual allegations in that complaint that Epstein forced L.M. to have "oral sex" with him were false. client confirmed this fact in her deposition, but never amended the complaint. + +(c) On or about October 13, 2009, Attorney Legamaro and his client, potential investor, Thane Ritchie, were shown Epstein case files at RRA for the purpose of obtaining Richies investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by with highly-charged sexual allegations solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Actions and advance the Ponzi scheme, as demonstrated by the fact that never served Epstein with a summons and complaint in that federal action, which action was filed long after filed and served a state court civil action on behalf of L.M. + +31. On or about October 17, 2009, M, who had filed a state complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on behalf of E. W, like the one had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M. + +32. also made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process in order to bolster the case to investors by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary "discovery," making unfounded allegations, and engaging in improper motion practice, including but not limited to: + +(1) Deposing three airplane pilots employed by Epstein, and seeking a deposition of a fourth pilot; collectively, the three were deposed for over twelve hours but were not asked a single question relating to any of the claims of i clients. Instead they were asked many inflammatory questions that had no legitimate legal purpose; + +(2) Noticing and subpoenaing for deposition the following people: + +- (a) Donald Trump (a real estate investor and television personality); +- (b) Alan Dershowitz (a renowned Harvard Law Professor and one of Epstein's criminal defense lawyers); +- (c) David Copperfield (illusionist); +- (d) Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations. + +Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not (3) asking any questions about MI clients; + +targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close to Epstein, not because they had any connection to, or knowledge of, the claims of clients. i intent was to harass Epstein's friends, family and acquaintances; + +(4) Asking outrageous questions of the Plaintiff in depositions which had no legitimate bearing on the cases or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding the size of his genitalia, whether witnesses would leave their children alone with the Plaintiff; + +(5) Conducting irrelevant and meritless discovery by issuing a subpoena to obtain records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Baird in Massachusetts, when issues relating to Epstein's mental and emotional states were not at issue and when Dr. Baird had never even treated the Plaintiff; + +(6) Directing and filing of Notices for the following health care professionals to produce medical records of Epstein, when Epstein's mental and emotional state was not an issue in the case: + +- (a) Charles J. Galecki, M.D.; +- (b) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and +- (c) Steven R. Alexander, Ph.D.; + +(7) Directing and filing Notices to the following banks of Epstein, Colonial Bank and Palm Beach National Bank, to produce all financial records of Epstein, allegedly for the purpose of obtaining records of payments by Epstein to the alleged victims, knowing full well that the alleged victims testified to being paid in cash; + +(8) Directing and filing of Notices to obtain all records of Epstein's prescriptions and all other health related documents at two local pharmacies, when no issues of Epstein's health had been raised in the Epstein Actions; + +(9) filed motions in the Epstein Actions attempting to plead a cause of action for RICO when there was no good faith basis for doing so; and + +(10) Edwards filed motions to freeze assets of Epstein without any evidence that Epstein was attempting to sequester or transfer assets and prior to obtaining a judgment against Epstein. Ultimately the federal district court found the " motion was entirely devoid of evidence of Defendant's [Epstein] alleged transfers". + +33. had ulterior motives for making these improper uses of civil process which included, among others: + +- (1) maintaining a Ponzi scheme; + +- (2) obtaining funds for the continued investigation and prosecution of the Epstein Actions; obtaining operating revenue so that RRA could continue to operate. +- (3) + +34. As a result of the above, the Plaintiff has suffered damages by incurring additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs to defend these abuses of process. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against Defendant J. for compensatory damages, interest, costs of this action, and any other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +## COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN + +35. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs I through 28, and 30 through 32, as if they were fully set forth herein. + +36. Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as ipin i an to defraud investors and further the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knew or should hav>ltr'wn of efforts to make illegal, improper, and perverted use of the civil process. + +37. The actions described in paragraphs 10 through 24 and 30 through 32 constitute overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy. + +38. As a member of the conspiracy, Rothstein is liable for the acts described herein. + +39. As a result of the conspiracy, Epstein has been damaged by incurring additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs and the cost of installing an enhanced security system and retention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against the Defendant, Scott Rothstein, for compensatory damages, costs, interest and any and other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Javbeen duly furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this 22nd day of August, 2011: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +CO + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 LS + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 C + +**Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 yy Suffolk,** ■ **02116** + +Respectfully submitted, + +for *Sandmel D. Tart* #358134 +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr. +Printer No. 235954 + +[REDACTED] BURNETT, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 South Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 +Telephone: (561) 802-9044 +Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +W:\80743\AMECOM85-Second Amended Complaint - 8-17-11-[REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f611631848ae496011f906f4ef664a4d06c149c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001/EFTA02770001.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,782 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770001.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 23461, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.08, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.333, + 43.035999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.72088623046875, + 43.035999999999994 + ], + [ + 460.72088623046875, + 73.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 144.333, + 73.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47199999999998, + 420.616 + ], + [ + 350.5689392089844, + 420.616 + ], + [ + 350.5689392089844, + 435.863037109375 + ], + [ + 248.47199999999998, + 435.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.04000000000002, + 370.272 + ], + [ + 379.0224914550781, + 370.272 + ], + [ + 379.0224914550781, + 386.49249267578125 + ], + [ + 222.04000000000002, + 386.49249267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.68999999999997, + 94.308 + ], + [ + 350.8153991699219, + 94.308 + ], + [ + 350.8153991699219, + 110.04998779296875 + ], + [ + 249.68999999999997, + 110.04998779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I: giliZ allev OF PROCESS -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 166.866, + 426.01200000000006 + ], + [ + 432.39, + 426.01200000000006 + ], + [ + 432.39, + 443.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 166.866, + 443.73248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 82.824, + 322.364 + ], + [ + 518.21923828125, + 322.364 + ], + [ + 518.21923828125, + 339.23248291015625 + ], + [ + 82.824, + 339.23248291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.413, + 178.2 + ], + [ + 382.8902587890625, + 178.2 + ], + [ + 382.8902587890625, + 192.363037109375 + ], + [ + 217.413, + 192.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770001" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2d4707ea38d0162baa117d7f4dcf03db0d8e9cd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.md @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +State of Florida + +County of Palm Beach + +15th Circuit Court + +Case Number: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG Court Date: 9/6/2011 10:00 am + +![](_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg) + +Plaintiff: +**JEFFREY EPSTEIN** + +ROC2011016339 + +vs. + +Defendant: + +**SCOTT ROTHSTEIN**, individually, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, and L.M., individually + +For: + +Jack Scarola +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Received by Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc on the 12th day of August, 2011 at 11:59 am to be served on **The Representative(s) of The Wackenhut Corporation with the most knowledge of the matters, 4200 Wackenhut Drive, Suite 102, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410.** + +I, Brandon Wieland, do hereby affirm that on the 18th day of August, 2011 at 11:55 am, I: + +**AUTHORIZED:** served by delivering a true copy of the **Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition and Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum** with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: **Karen Savianac** as **Paralegal**, who stated they are authorized to accept service for: **The Wackenhut Corporation** at the address of: **1395 University Boulevard, Jupiter, FL 33458**, and informed said person of the contents therein. + +**Description of Person Served:** Age: 45, Sex: F, Race/Skin Color: [REDACTED], Height: 5'8, Weight: 140, Hair: Black, Glasses: Y + +Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true. I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Certified Process Server, in good standing, in the county in which service was effected in accordance with State Statutes. + +![]() + +--- + +**Brandon Wieland** +Process Server-1280 + +**Rock Legal Services & Investigations Inc** +**2048 Ponce De [REDACTED] Avenue** +**West Palm Beach, FL 33407** +**(561) 296-7574** + +Our Job Serial Number: ROC-2011016339 +Ref: 291874 + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiffs, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +CASE NO: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +C6 I bilff la -Ca WI cy..; + +## SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR IGNITION + +THE STATE OF FLORIDA \X/ TO: The Representative(s) of The Wackenhut Corporation with the most knowledge of the matters set forth below pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. I.310(b)(6) + +YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear before a person authorized by law to take depositions at the offices of undersigned counsel on Tuesday, September 6, 2011, at 10:00 AM, for the taking of your deposition in this action. You are to have with you at the above place and time the following: + +## DUCES TECUM: • + +Any and all documents\* reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +- 1. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. for the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger including but not limited to documents reflecting when the services were performed, how long they were performed, the nature of the services, and by whom they were performed. + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition + +Page 2 of 2 + +\*"Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "Documents" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system metadata. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission features), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. + +*If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court.* + +You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney and unless excused from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. + +DATED this 12th day of August 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola + +Florida Bar No.: 169440 + +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard + +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 + +Phone: (561) 686-6300 + +Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +Attorneys for Defendant [REDACTED] + +• . "If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Krista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvAlida que necesita algon acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga Ia amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Krista Garber Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator" por lo menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia en los tribunales, o inmediatamente despues de recibir esta notificacien si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitacion del oido o de la voz, flame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki berm Ikomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou\* n okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Taupe kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou paret nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvokasyon an sit ou gen pou w paret nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si ou gen pivot!, pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3f6f10d691f2fe9123dcdc25fe2d70d76402d19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/EFTA02770017.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6015, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.16, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RETURN OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 26.016000000000002 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 26.016000000000002 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 41.463 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 41.463 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR IGNITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 306.50100000000003 + ], + [ + 443.56695556640625, + 306.50100000000003 + ], + [ + 443.56695556640625, + 323.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 169.52400000000003, + 323.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DUCES TECUM: \u2022", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 530.076 + ], + [ + 180.6748504638672, + 530.076 + ], + [ + 180.6748504638672, + 545.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 545.9830169677734 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770017" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64830f0a5b01b509d172ce592841cbbd27461d61 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770017/_page_0_Picture_193.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:40cd943acab19530531914e2d2fa230bde453ed08419a6f7d714754b05f53bdc +size 7072 diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a12c2d7d69b0f9eb1d2560ab93b125b182c16da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.md @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009C 040800XXXXMB-AG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 AUG 24 PM 4:11 +SHAROTT BOCK. CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +FILED + +**PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS** + +Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of the following scrivener's errors contained in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, and attaches hereto a Corrected Second Amended Complaint ( Ex. A) reflecting the following corrections: + +1. The word "conspiracy" in the last line of the Introduction is corrected to read "conspiracy." + +2. The first sentence in Paragraph 30(a) is corrected to read as follows: + +On September 11, 2008, [REDACTED] filed a state court action on behalf of client L.M. against Epstein seeking damages. + +3. The second sentence in Paragraph 30(b) is corrected to read as follows: + +However, Epstein was never served. + +4. Paragraph 33(1) is corrected to read as follows: + +(1) to facilitate Rothstein's attempts to obtain investments as set forth herein; + +5. Paragraph 33(3) is corrected to read as follows: + +(3) obtaining operating revenue so that RRA could continue to operate as set forth herein. + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this 24th day of August, 2011: + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Weinberg, Esq. ■ G. Weinberg, P.A. **N-** 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 + +C .) + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scuola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A Al& 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. CO \ Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Ntivor 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +'S )A9 + +CP\* + +Respectfully submitted, + +9? . 4 Isl.sz6 Ackerman, Jr. + +FIB. Ba o. 235954 + +BURNETI", P.A. 9. ar West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 + +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, Cn + +Defendants. + +C + +#### 6.11' CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT + +The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and J. a") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: + +#### INTRODUCTION + +This litigation has at i -core a law firm that has been described by a United States Attorney as a criminal enterpri ts founder, Scott Rothstein — la partner, is currently serving a 50-year sent federal prison for selling fake settlements to unsuspecting investors. law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA"), Rothstein and °dick criminal enterprise conducted a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme which was perpeAt ith fake agreements, forged signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what was essentially legal extortion, Rothstein persuaded investors, that he could pressure defendants, including Epstein, into paying astronomical settlements and further defrauded investors by convincing them to purchase fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, + +=BURNETT P A. • 901 4I n 11 I EXHIBIT + +including those falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA for clients with claims against Epstein, to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendant made improper use of the judicial system and civil process by inter alia filing a complaint in federal court, although a state court complaint had been pending on behalf of the same plaintiff for almost a year, engaging in unreasonable and vexatious discovery and motion practice in certain underlying actions against Epstein, making unfounded and highly charged sexual allegations in these underlying actions, and using improper investigatory tools, and causing damages to Epstein. The United States government has stated that Rothstein conspired with others to use RRA as a criminal enterprise to conduct a racketeering activity, including mail and wire fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. + +### GENERAL CATIONS + +- 1. This is an action for dame to ss of fifteen thousand dollars (\$15,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs. + - 2. Epstein is domie ed in m Beach County, Florida. +- 3. Rothstein was at all relevant times a resident of Broward County, Florida, and the chairman, managing partner and chief executive officer of a law firm called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), whose main office was in Broward County. +- 4. is a resident of Broward County, Florida, and is licensed to practice law in the state of Florida. +- 5. Beginning in April, 2009, and at all relevant times, was a partner in RRA. + +### The Ponzi Scheme + +6. During 2009 Rothstein pursued a course of criminal conduct which included a scheme to defraud various investors into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements by showing them complaints filed in the cases against Epstein, which settlements were falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA on behalf of clients, including clients who had brought legal actions against the Plaintiff, in exchange for immediate payments to these clients of a discounted lump sum amount. + +7. The purpose of the investments was to enrich Rothstein, along with other members of RRA and others, to sustain the daily operations of RRA, and specifically, among other things, to raise capital to continue to fund investigators which were to be used in the prosecution of claims against the Plaintiff. + +8. At or near the time that Rothstein and others in his firm, many of whom have pled guilty to federal crimes, were pursuing this Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). + +14/ 9 he lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant + +10. Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through October, 2009, in support of the massive Ponzi scheme, Rothstein made various representations to potential investors regarding the Epstein Actions, as well as other alleged claims against Epstein, including, but not limited to, the following: + +(1) That RRA had settled one case for at least Thirty Million Dollars (\$30,000,000); + +(2) That RRA had a team of investigators consisting of former law enforcement officers, including a former sheriff, who would use this sophisticated eavesdropping equipment and sift through a potential defendant's garbage looking for damaging evidence that could be used to benefit RRA clients by enhancing the value of the clients' claims, and thereby engaging in tactics tantamount to legal extortion; + +(3) That Rothstein had meetings with Epstein's alle victims and their families regarding the structured settlements; + +(4) That these victims would take a lesser settleMent f paid promptly and that investors who funded these early payments would be paid their investment plus a return when Epstein paid the greater amounts to settle the claims; + +(5) That in addition to the Epstein Actions, many women were lined up to settle with Epstein with claims for hundreds of millions of dollars; + +(6) That RRA attorneys would sue lip and disclose embarrassing information about Epstein, his family, friends and associates unless Epstein paid exorbitant settlements; + +(7) That if the potential investors did not make investments as promised on a strict timetable, RRA risked being fired and would lose the cases they had against Epstein to other lawyers; and + +(8) That one of the RRA clients felt that Rothstein had lied to her repeatedly about funding, and that she was one step away from going to another lawyer and going to the Florida Bar. + +11. RRA employed a team of investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael Fisten ("Fiste ") and former Broward County Sheriff and convicted felon Ken Jenne ("Jenne"). + +sten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to a, and routinely reported to and Rothstein regarding their investigations of Epstein. + +13. brought the clients Jane Doe, EW, and LM to RRA when he joined the firm in April, 2009. + +14. Rothstein approved incurring costs between \$110,000 to \$200,000 on the Epstein Actions, costs paid for as the proceeds of its massive fraud. + +15. In October, 2009, Rothstein directed investigative team to bring case files into a conference room at RRA to be examined by potential investors. Then, Fisten and Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19) boxes. + +16. On or about October 13, 2009, Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of RRA, to look at the Epstein case files that Fisten and Jenne had stacked around the conference room. + +17. On or about October 13, 2009, Illinois attorney, Michael Legamaro, and his client, hedge fund operator Thane Ritchie, were also invited to examine Epstein case files and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly cj ont lined the names of numerous celebrities who purportedly flew on Epstein aircraft. Mr"1L4ga1hajo and his client reviewed both the flight log and the case files in the offices of + +18. The Epstein case files re displayed to potential investors in RRA's office to show them that the cases against Epstein were legitimate and that the alleged victims actually existed, all for the purpose of obtaining the investments. + +19. Although has given sworn deposition testimony that only a few attorneys employed at RRA were directly involved in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, a privilege log prepared by and other documents, clearly reflect that more than eighteen (18) RRA lawyers were involved in prosecuting the Epstein Actions. Additionally, four RRA investigators and several legal assistants and paralegals were involved in the Epstein Actions. + +20. On multiple occasions, and in contrast to M' sworn testimony, many RRA attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, including as described below: + +a) On May 3, 2009, Adler ("Adler"), a name partner in RRA, who took part with in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, sent an email tchtbsitaff and attorneys in RRA regarding depositions in the Epstein Actions; + +b) On July 17, 2009, Jenne sent an email to Actions; ut the Epstein + +c) On July 18, 2009, sent an email to Adler, stating that "with the right moves we could force Epstein to settle for a lot of money"; + +d) On July 22, 2009, sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting. On July 23, 2009, Priscila Nascimento, one of the secretaries to Rothstein, was advised of the scheduled meeting; + +e) On July 29, 2009, Cara an attorney at RRA working on the Epstein cases, and a former agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sent an email to stating that "our best bet is to go after those close to Epstein"; + +about %July, 2009, and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails o proof on a previously-filed motion, which claimed that Epstein was moving his assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; + +g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstcin regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, sent an email to RRA attorneys called litigation strategy regarding Epstein; + +h) On August 17, 2009, sent an email to Nurik regarding a legal opinion on the Epstein matter; + +i) In the month of August, 2009, M, Jenne and Fisten, exchanged emails on approximately four occasions discussing investigative techniqu 0 at fther Epstein matters; + +j) In the month of September, 2009, emails ) exchanged between and William Berger ("Berger"), a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. + +k) On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Elizabeth Villar, a legal assistant to Rothstein, about Epstein's alleged asset transfers; and + +I) On September 4 and again on September 9, 2009, and Fisten exchanged emails on Epstein Litigation Strategy. + +21. By August, 2009, was aware that RRA' s offices were audio monitored and recorded, including discussions on speakerphone. + +22. Beginning in October, 2009, the level of communications by and between and others, including Rothstein, described below, increased dramatically, as Rothstein was running out of money, and was in search of new victims in order to continue to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme, and coincided with Rothstein's efforts to get the investments for the Epstein actions concluded. Those communications include: + +a) From October 5, 2009 to October 18, 2009, emails were sent between and Berger, and Fisten, and and RRA attorneys regarding Epstein Litigation Strategy. + +b) On October 19, 2009, Evidence. sent an email to Nurik on JEE [Epstein] + +c) During this same time frame Rothstein was exchan with the investors for the Epstein cases, telling them that if the investment w soon he would lose the client group to other lawyers. + +d) During this same time frame, specifically on or around October 13, 2009, Kretschmar and Legamaro of the investor group we shown by Rothstein the actual case files of RRA in the Epstein Actions. The Epstein fil ought to the conference room by Fisten and Jenne. + +e) During this e Se i frame, e on or around October 21, 2011, A.J. Discala, a potential investor in the Epstein mattes, sent an email to Rothstein about the private placement memoranda for the investment. + +23. On October 22, 2009, the following events occurred: < + +possible wards sent an email to book a conference room for as many attorneys as a meeting on October 23, 2009 on the Epstein Actions. The email requested that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry M, Mike Wheeler, Cara =, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; + +b) Nurik emailed about the meeting; + +c) sent an email to Pat M, another investigator on the Epstein case, regarding " new developments which require your expertise." + +lawyer if the investment is not made right away; b) Rothstein emailed the investors that the Epstein client is going to another A + +Epstein; c) Rothstein sent an email to Adler regarding ca tion against + +24. On October 23, 2009, the following events occurred: + +a) Jenne sent an email to Rothstein advising him of an October 23, 2009 meeting; + +d) Adler sent an email to RRA attorneys on Epstein litigation strategy; + +e) sent an email to RRA attorneys on Epstein litigation strategy; + +I) against Epstein; sent an email to eys regarding causes of action + +g) Epstein; Adler sent an em • 4to thstein regarding causes of action against + +h) Rothstein t to egarnaro, counsel for the Investors, an email regarding the causes of action against Epstein. + +Based upon the foregoing, Rothstein received information from and Adler regarding causes of action against Epstein, and Rothstein then sent information regarding causes of action against Epstein to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors for the purpose of obtaining funds for the Ponzi scheme. + +25. Given the interdependence of so many RRA lawyers, investigators, and other staff, and the wide communications that necessarily accompanied the involvement of so many people, knew, or should have known, that his Epstein case files were being shown and touted to investors and that he was assisting and aiding Rothstein to close the deal with the investors, particularly where the magnitude of the potential settlements in the Epstein Actions was a key selling point. + +26. In October, 2009, Rothstein convinced investors to put up money to realize a substantial return emanating from the fraudulent settlement of the Epstein cases. + +27. In November, 2009, RRA collapsed and ultimately went into bituki'flcy and Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license and was disbarred by t Aclilitrida Supreme Court. + +28. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in fe Cdourt, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for.fraud and racketeering, based on an alleged \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his own pockets, and those of his cohorts. The federal government called RRA a criminal enterprise. + +## COUNT I: ABUSE OF PROCESS - + +29. Plaintiff reallege each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 as if they were fully set fo + +30. made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process as follows: + +(a) On September 11, 2008, filed a state court action on behalf of client L.M. against Epstein seeking damages. On July 22, 2009, sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting. + +(b) On July 24, 2009, on behalf of client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV-81092. However, Epstein was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's + +last name so as not to alert the defendant that the case had been filed. Each of the one hundred and fifty-six counts (156) is a separate cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, which provides a civil remedy authorizing damages of no less than \$150,000 per violation. Thus, sought total damages in excess of Twenty-Three Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (\$23,400,000.00). knew or should have known that highly-charged sexual allegations in that complaint that Epstein forced L.M. to have "oral sex" with him were false. IM client confirmed this fact in her deposition, but never amended the complaint. + +(c) On or about October 13, 2009, Attorney Legamaro and his client, potential investor, Thane Ritchie, were shown Epstein case files at RRA for the purpose of obtaining Richie's investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by with highly-charged sexual allegations solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Actions and advance the Ponzi scheme, as demonstrated by the fact that never served Epstein with a summons and complaint in that federal action, which action was filed long after filed and served a state court civil action on behalf of L.M. + +31. On or about October 17, 2009, MI, who had filed a state complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed MI assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W, like the one had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M. + +32. also made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process in order to bolster the case to investors by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary "discovery," making unfounded allegations, and engaging in improper motion practice, including but not limited to: + +(1) Deposing three airplane pilots employed by Epstein, and seeking a deposition of a fourth pilot; collectively, the three were deposed for over twelve hours but were not asked a single question relating to any of the claims of clients. Instead they were asked many inflammatory questions that had no legitimate legal purpose; + +- (2) Noticing and subpoenaing for deposition the following people: + +- (a) Donald Trump (a real estate investor and television personality); +- (b) Alan Dershowitz (a renowned Harvard Law Professor and one of Epstein's criminal defense lawyers); +- (c) David Copperfield (illusionist); +- (d) Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations. + +Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not (3) asking any questions about M' clients; + +targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close to Epstein, not because they had any connection to, or knowledge of, the claims of MI clients. intent was to harass Epstein's friends, family and acquaintances; + +(4) Asking outrageous questions of the Plaintiff in depositions which had no legitimate g the cases or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding the size of his gem ether witnesses would leave their children alone with the Plaintiff; + +(5) Conducting irrelevant and meritless discovery by issuing a subpoena to obtain records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Baird in Massachusetts, when issues relating to Epstein's mental and emotional states were not at issue and when Dr. Baird had never even treated the Plaintiff; + +(6) Directing and filing of Notices for the following health care professionals to produce medical records of Epstein, when Epstein's mental and emotional state was not an issue in the case: + +- (a) Charles J. Galecki, M.D.; +- (b) Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and +- (c) Steven R. Alexander, Ph.D.; + +(7) Directing and filing Notices to the following banks of Epstein, Colonial Bank and Palm Beach National Bank, to produce all financial records of Epstein, allegedly for the purpose of obtaining records of payments by Epstein to the alleged victims, knowing full well that the alleged victims testified to being paid in cash; + +(8) Directing and filing of Notices to obtain all records of Epstein's prescriptions and all other health related documents at two local pharmacies, when no issues of Epstein's health had been raised in the Epstein Actions; + +(9) filed motions in the Epstein Actions attempting to plead a cause of action for RICO when there was no good faith basis for doing so; and + +(10) filed motions to freeze assets of Epstein without any evidence that Epstein was attempting to sequester or transfer assets and prior to obtaining a judgment against Epstein. Ultimately the federal district court found the " motion was entirely devoid of evidence of Defendant's [Epstein] alleged transfers". + +33. had ulterior motives for making these improper uses of civil process which included, among others: + +> (1) to facilitate Rothstein's attempts to obtain investments as set forth herein; + +- (2) obtaining funds for the continued investigation and prosecution of the Epstein Actions; +- (3) obtaining operating revenue so that RRA could continue to operate as set forth herein. + +34. As a result of the above, the Plaintiff has suffered damages by incurring additional and unnecessary attorneys fees and costs to defend these abuses of process. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against Defendant J. for compensatory damages, interest, costs of this action, and any other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +# COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN + +35. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28, and 30 through 32, as if they were hilly set forth herein. + +36. Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied agreement to engage • ,in the tort of abuse of process as part of a plan to defraud investors and further the Ponz scheme. Rothstein knew or should have known of Mi efforts to make illegal, improper, and perverted use of the civil process. + +37. The actions described in paragraphs 10 through 24 and 30 through 32 constitute overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy. + +38. As a member of the conspiracy, Rothstein is liable for the acts described herein. + +39. Asa result of the conspiracy, Epstein has been damaged by incurring additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs and the cost of installing an enhanced security system and retention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property. + +WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against the Defendant, Scott Rothstein, for compensatory damages, costs, interest and any and other relief deemed appropriate by this Court. + +#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing j n duly furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this 24th day of August, 2011: + +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A P.O. Drawer 3626 Jack Scarola, Esq. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +CO S + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. "S) Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700c is) Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 + +Respectfully submitted, + +ep Ackerman, Jr. a. ar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. Facsimile: (561) 802-99C) owe + +901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 3340 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 + +W:1807431A M ECOM 7 I -Corrected Second A mended-HSG.docx \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8afa4fc172962b03d2255fba1135d7bc22fc96ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021/EFTA02770021.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,950 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770021.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 18, + "chars": 25604, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.57, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 145.656, + 43.035999999999994 + ], + [ + 459.612, + 43.035999999999994 + ], + [ + 459.612, + 71.45599999999999 + ], + [ + 145.656, + 71.45599999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 159.12, + 308.56 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 308.56 + ], + [ + 443.7, + 323.176 + ], + [ + 159.12, + 323.176 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.26000000000002, + 127.32700000000001 + ], + [ + 378.18023681640625, + 127.32700000000001 + ], + [ + 378.18023681640625, + 142.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 223.26000000000002, + 142.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.583, + 58.38043212890625 + ], + [ + 452.6469421386719, + 58.38043212890625 + ], + [ + 452.6469421386719, + 90.6920166015625 + ], + [ + 154.583, + 90.6920166015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "6.11' \nCORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.691, + 304.5452880859375 + ], + [ + 433.3561706542969, + 304.5452880859375 + ], + [ + 433.3561706542969, + 328.4420471191406 + ], + [ + 171.691, + 328.4420471191406 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 254.17599999999996, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 350.78326416015625, + 417.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 350.78326416015625, + 430.8120422363281 + ], + [ + 254.17599999999996, + 430.8120422363281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "GENERAL CATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.404, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 379.0727844238281, + 369.36 + ], + [ + 379.0727844238281, + 384.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 222.404, + 384.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Ponzi Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.50999999999996, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 349.8983459472656, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 349.8983459472656, + 107.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 250.50999999999996, + 107.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I: ABUSE OF PROCESS -", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.75000000000003, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 430.05, + 423.63 + ], + [ + 430.05, + 440.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 167.75000000000003, + 440.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.096, + 347.919 + ], + [ + 517.82275390625, + 347.919 + ], + [ + 517.82275390625, + 364.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 83.096, + 364.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.77, + 177.361572265625 + ], + [ + 382.8902587890625, + 177.361572265625 + ], + [ + 382.8902587890625, + 191.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 217.77, + 191.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770021" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fab9eae512162a3bcbc34019e0a3cbb7d46bd08 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +I + +C in. 3> = r ",. ... . n a= Xini mcD2 Jon, cr, .: cz-x, —n• ni . ., -4 SCID r . I= • - CI . a --fp 9 "vi, " r - + +-e14/4C ) + +## MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint against him for failure to state a cause of action and in support thereof would show: + +- litigation privile +- 2. pt for the filing of a federal complaint that did not name Epstein and was appar r served on him,\* the Amended Complaint fails to identify the "process" alleged to be abusive, on whom it is claimed to have been served, or when it is claimed to have been served; +- 1. the "Introducti to the Second Amended Complaint is nothing more than conclusory surplusage a p7en tly intended to defame Mr. under the protection of the + +i\* P i h 30(b) of the Second Amended Complaint references a federal civil action with which was never served." Presumably, since the complaint is alleged to have been filed by r the allegation was meant to have referenced Epstein rather than + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +[REDACTED] Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +1. 3. the Amended Complaint fails to articulate a cognizable theory of damages proximately caused by any wrongdoing on the part of [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]; +2. 4. the Amended Complaint fails to identify any conduct outside the protection of the litigation privilege which could give rise to any liability on the part of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]; +3. 5. all legal arguments and authorities as contained in the Defendant's previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages are incorporated herein by reference. + +WHEREFORE, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], demands dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint against him. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this AUG 10 day of August, 2011. + +![]()= adv. Epstein Motkn to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Phone: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +=, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 N sbocne: (561) 802-9044 : (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c52571e1aa13cef51d05af5feca057a1ac468ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039/EFTA02770039.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770039.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3192, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 309.56499999999994, + 71.544 + ], + [ + 535.5283813476562, + 71.544 + ], + [ + 535.5283813476562, + 114.363037109375 + ], + [ + 309.56499999999994, + 114.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 144.05499999999998, + 348.777 + ], + [ + 469.95025634765625, + 348.777 + ], + [ + 469.95025634765625, + 363.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 144.05499999999998, + 363.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.876, + 132.519 + ], + [ + 353.7082824707031, + 132.519 + ], + [ + 353.7082824707031, + 148.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 258.876, + 148.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770039" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ecfbe0d7c795f45f63f0d4fd5045669981f667f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +SHARON R. BOCK-CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL / PROBATE + +FILED + +2011 AUG 29 PM 4:05 + +MOTION TO SCHEDULE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S +PENDING MOTIONS FOR HEARING + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], moves this Honorable Court to set the Defendant/Counter-plaintiff's pending motions for hearing and in support of this motion would show that the Plaintiff/Counter-defendant's counsel has been unresponsive and uncooperative in multiple attempts to set these matters without the need for Court intervention. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 21th day of August, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAC Motion to Schedule Defendant/Counter-plaintiff's pending motions for hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +**Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 Phone: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538** + +**Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691** + +**Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 ( S" Lehrman, PL Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822** + +**Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. 'k One E Broward Blvd., Su Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556** + +**L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976** + +**ass** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4d9629acc3ab8ba0184ec2d4cab0fbf9fffbad0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042/EFTA02770042.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770042.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2159, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.33299999999997, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 532.181, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 532.181, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 307.33299999999997, + 112.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO SCHEDULE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTIONS FOR HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.2, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 486.967, + 347.49 + ], + [ + 486.967, + 374.22 + ], + [ + 122.2, + 374.22 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 257.42, + 130.571 + ], + [ + 352.2082824707031, + 130.571 + ], + [ + 352.2082824707031, + 146.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 257.42, + 146.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770042" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90d232b05ab69a1e571542dd818d5793021f040e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, , individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +## NOTICE OF HEARIN<'') G + +YOU ARE. HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 + +TIME: 8:45 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorable David F (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 9-C + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: + +Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, Motion to Schedule Pending Motions for Hearing J. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve this dispute without hearing. + +-n + +in + +sit c2 a + +r•120T. r-,3 C c: , 72- nr•17, + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Hearing + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by +Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this Wet day of August, 2011. + +![]()JACK SCAROLA +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Hearing + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger®agwpa.com; smahoney®agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +NM, Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman Jr., Esquire ; NTrompet@fowler-Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Orly, + +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com /^41' Law Offices of Marc S. Naik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +Weinberg, Esquire owlmcb@att.net; owlmgw®attnet Martin Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, El 02116 Phone: (617)-227-3700 Fax: (617)-338-9538 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contactKrista Garber, Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvàlida queA"recesl'ta algún acomodamiento para poder participar en este plecedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en cont to on Krista Garber Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator, o menos 7 dias antes de la cita fijada para su comparecencia}en los tribunales, o inmediatamente después de recibir esta notificación si el tiempo antes de la comparecencia que se ha programado es menos de 7 dias; si usted tiene discapacitación del oído o det\*selt, Dame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun Ici enfim k,\* zwen akomodasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye saq t u pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kèk èd. Tanpri kontakte nan 7 jou anvan dat ou gen randevou pou parèt nan tribinal la, oubyen imedyatman apre ou fin resevwa konvoka n an si lè ou gen pou w parèt nan tribinal la mwens ke 7 jou; si A o gen woblém pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe8fef03162e48c1ed590c6de480089978292ff9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044/EFTA02770044.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770044.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 3852, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 306.936, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 532.875, + 113.60302734375 + ], + [ + 306.936, + 113.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARIN<'') G", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 238.11900000000003, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 372.47021484375, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 372.47021484375, + 362.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 238.11900000000003, + 362.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.453, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 350.714, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 350.714, + 143.97802734375 + ], + [ + 258.453, + 143.97802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 91 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770044" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72919e5dab62dd8aa3df4c26da552e00d05eb9fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). +\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_ + +FILED +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL + +NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT + +COMES NOW the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby provides notice that he served upon the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, a Proposal for Settlement. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by *Emil And* +U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 30th day of August, 2011. + +![]()Jack Scarola +Florida Bar No.: 169440 +Searey Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 +Phone: (561) 686-6300 +Fax: (561) 383-9451 +Attorney for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Serving Proposal for Settlement + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. N One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +**Weinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk,** ■ **02116 Phone: (617)-227-3700 Fax: (617)-338-9538** + +**co's** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01aafc13fe429c0cf4aa54e191a9c12b34e0342f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048/EFTA02770048.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770048.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1925, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.95, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.94, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 460.836, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 149.94, + 362.07 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 133.98 + ], + [ + 343.2082824707031, + 133.98 + ], + [ + 343.2082824707031, + 150.10302734375 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 150.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770048" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9ed7b59e6a071ce28cc3fd4c225e8a1e9f31016 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +**MOTION TO WITHDRAW PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE AS +COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN & CONSENT THERETO** + +COMES NOW, [REDACTED] G. WEINBERG, who has appeared Pro Hac Vice and has a limited appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and respectfully moves this Court for an Order allowing Martin G. Weinberg to withdraw as counsel of record and as grounds therefor states as follows: + +1. 1. Undersigned was asked by Epstein to appear for the limited purpose to provide expertise on privilege issues. +2. 2. Upon reconsideration, it is no longer necessary for the undersigned to remain as counsel in the above-captioned case. +3. 3. Epstein will continue to be represented by [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. and Jack Alan Goldberger, of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +4. 4. Epstein consents to the undersigned's withdrawal. + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL PROCURATE +2011 AUG 31 PM 4:36 + +**COPY FILED** + +Epstein v Rothstein, CASE NO. 50 20W.CA ati80-03CXXXMR, - Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw of Pro Hac Vice Appearance & Consent Thereto + +5. No harm or prejudice will result to the Defendants as a result of the granting of this motion. The matter is not set for hearing or trial. + +WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting G. Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance from this case. + +## CONSENT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +COMES NOWilly Epstein, as Plaintiff in the above-styled case, and hereby consents to the withdrawal of G. Weinberg, Esquire's Pro Hace Vice limited appearance in this lawsuit from further representation. + +> By: Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +# CERTIFICATE OF. SERVICE. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this St "'day of August, 2011: + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point, West Tower 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Epstein v Rothstein, CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XICOCKIM Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw of Pro Hac Vice Appearance & Consent Thereto + +5. No harm or prejudice will result to the Defendants as a result of the granting of this motion. The matter is not set for hearing or trial. + +WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting G. Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance from this + +## CONSENT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN + +COMES NOW y Epstein, as Plaintiff in the above-styled case, and'Pby consents to the withdrawal of G. Weinberg, Esquire's Pro Hace Vice lirrt dappearance in this lawsuit from further representation. + +By: + +## CERTIFICATAI CE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email and U.S. Mail, this 918/-day of August, 2011: + +A kemian, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point, West To 777 South Flagler Dri ''- West Palm Beach, FL + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterburi Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401.5012 + +Epstein v Rothstein, CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X30OCMB AG Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw of Pro Hac Vice Appearance & Consent Thereto + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +**Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk,. 02116** + +**Respectfully submitted.** + +**WM07431MOTIONSWiiiresideislo** + +**G. Weinberg, Esq.** + +**20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Telephone: (617) 227-3700 icc)/338-9538** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b515861e3ac66623447c0e123ddd676858e7a2e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050/EFTA02770050.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770050.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4249, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 158.508, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 463.89599999999996, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 463.89599999999996, + 118.25999999999999 + ], + [ + 158.508, + 118.25999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION TO WITHDRAW PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, JEFFREY EPSTEIN & CONSENT THERETO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 80.78399999999999, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 481.64399999999995, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 481.64399999999995, + 373.40999999999997 + ], + [ + 80.78399999999999, + 373.40999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONSENT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 214.2, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 404.1561584472656, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 404.1561584472656, + 230.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 214.2, + 230.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF. SERVICE.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 389.7156982421875, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 389.7156982421875, + 402.363037109375 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 402.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONSENT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.345, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 404.16851806640625, + 207.36 + ], + [ + 404.16851806640625, + 220.46258544921875 + ], + [ + 241.345, + 220.46258544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATAI CE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 253.565, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 392.4587097167969, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 392.4587097167969, + 367.09259033203125 + ], + [ + 253.565, + 367.09259033203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 42 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770050" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4609a1b45935d40035ed79cf27932ccc41152d85 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. , individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +/ + +## NOTICE OF HEARING + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in Courtroom 9C at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida on Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 8:45 am., the following: + +> G. Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein + +I hereby certify that I have made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this motkon for hearing. + +itiga PL % 0E VERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. + +ro o crr 473 -ft' c G.) nen,' -cos • :wog" . n + +rdance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach County, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number (561) 355- 4796, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via CI Facsimile, C .S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, O Federal Express this 31" day of August, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarab Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +**Weinberg, Esquire G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 02116 (v** 04 + +110/S22 )C Jo Ackerman, Jr. F B No. 235954 + +BURNETT', P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..346a476c03f76fed3fdaebe1e46291856bcb5d3e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054/EFTA02770054.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770054.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2148, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.862, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 465.6181945800781, + 42.92999999999999 + ], + [ + 465.6181945800781, + 71.613037109375 + ], + [ + 147.862, + 71.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.127, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 389.207, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 389.207, + 323.613037109375 + ], + [ + 218.127, + 323.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.04000000000002, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 387.3902587890625, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 387.3902587890625, + 107.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.04000000000002, + 107.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770054" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61d9e3f9bfd5bb5860ecbe02422f8c741cf967c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**FILED** + +2011 AUG 31 AM 11:33 + +ORDER ON MOTION TO SCHEDULE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S +PENDING MOTIONS FOR HEARING + +THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon MOTION TO SCHEDULE +DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTIONS FOR HEARING, and the +Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, + +ORDERED and ADJUDGED: THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. THE PARTIES +SHALL AGREE ON AN AVAILABLE HEARING DATE BY 5 P.M. TODAY OR +ON APPLICATION THE COURT SHALL UNILATERALLY SET THE HEARING +WITHOUT RECORD TO ITS COUNSEL'S SCHEDULE. + +DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this + +day of Aug, 2011. + +![]()DAVID F. CROW +CIRCUIT JUDGE + +Copies have been furnished to all counsel on the attached counsel list. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein + +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +Order on Motion to Schedule Defendant/Counter-plaintiff's Pending +Motions for Hearing + +### COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], etal. +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: (617)-227-3700 +Fax: (617)-338-9538 + +Jack Scarola, Esquire +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 +Phone: 561-686-6300 +Fax: 561-383-9451 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4251b13bac395ab7703b42c618c709da1a46b9b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056/EFTA02770056.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770056.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2314, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.48, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.836, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 533.664, + 113.4 + ], + [ + 307.836, + 113.4 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER ON MOTION TO SCHEDULE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTIONS FOR HEARING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.74, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.036, + 333.71999999999997 + ], + [ + 522.036, + 361.26 + ], + [ + 88.74, + 361.26 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 157.334 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 157.334 + ], + [ + 351.9, + 171.932 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 171.932 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770056" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcd507a6989c2a363aa566a0e70985e13396fb75 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +DIVISION CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +V. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually, J. Individually, and L.M., Individually, + +Defendant. + +la• -n O + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DE ENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF individuall + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendat, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, has served upon Defendant/Counter PI la individually, a Proposal for Settlement dated August 25, 20I + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile and mailed this ay of August, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer. 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +**Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, Ill 02116** + +**Respectfully submitted,** + +W:407.43'NOTIC975-of &mins PFS-M1Stat + +L Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 + +gaiiC)0 1 ) + +WHIT 901 Point 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Fcmilc . (561) 802-9976 E1T, P.A. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8178f4c22db52d6db89c16bc40168943879d728 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058/EFTA02770058.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770058.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1431, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 465.97088623046875, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 465.97088623046875, + 105.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 105.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SERVING \nPROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DE ENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nindividuall", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 342.63 + ], + [ + 536.7239999999999, + 384.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 384.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 478.71 + ], + [ + 387.3902587890625, + 478.71 + ], + [ + 387.3902587890625, + 493.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 222.15599999999998, + 493.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770058" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38227501b0d0baa28157f197dfa782f6836955b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), + +VS. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendant(s). + +/ + +## NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING (30 Minutes) + +0 c—• --- rri zc' -v -.c000 • a•co 6n:A cab CR cz .:74" re, ,C r4 + +YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: + +DATE: September 28, 2C'' ) + +TIME: 8:15 a.m. + +JUDGE: Honorablet:irl F. (Palm Beach County Courthouse) + +PLACE: 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +ROOM #: 9C + +SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: (1) Defendant/Counter-Claimant, J. Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages; and (2) Defendant/Counter-Claimant, J. Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint + +- 1. The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue is resolved. +- 2. No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XVOCMBAG Notice of Special Set Hearing on 9/28/11 + +- 3. Any Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages. +- 4. Any materials submitted are due at least 7 days prior to the hearing. +- 5. The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes. + +Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing. + +\*In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding, contact the Court Administrator's office not later than seven (7) days prior to the proceedings. If hearing impaired, contact (TDD) 1400-955-8771, or (fl 1-800-955-8770 via Florida Relay. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list; this 3 14 day of Atefor-. , 2011. + +CiS \*) \7 C LL + +JAC AROLA Fl Bar No.: 169440 rcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561.9451 Attorneys for J. + +[REDACTED] adv. Epstein +Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG +Notice of Special Set Hearing on 9/28/11 + +**COUNSEL LIST** + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire +Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401 +Phone: (561)-659-8300 +Fax: (561)-835-8691 + +[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos & +Lehrman, PL +425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-524-2820 +Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +[REDACTED] L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire +[REDACTED] Burnett, P.A. +901 [REDACTED] Point West +777 S Flagler Drive +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 +Phone: (561)-802-9044 +Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 +Phone: (954)-745-5849 +Fax: (954)-745-3556 + +[REDACTED] Weinberg, Esquire +[REDACTED] Weinberg, P.C. +20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 +Suffolk, [REDACTED] 02116 +Phone: (617)-227-3700 +Fax: (617)-338-9538 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4dfbb303507acab50cffe06cc7336418c5060b3d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060/EFTA02770060.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770060.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3161, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE \nFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND \nFOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 308.448, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 534.4083862304688, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 534.4083862304688, + 113.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 308.448, + 113.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF SPECIAL SET HEARING \n(30 Minutes)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.288, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 412.5703430175781, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 412.5703430175781, + 377.60302734375 + ], + [ + 198.288, + 377.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 351.28799999999995, + 143.37 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 143.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 77 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770060" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ab0f78f69b010e5deb1184d48861409d5e4333f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually, + +Defendants. + +## RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION + +\*Duces Tecum (CHANGING TIME ONLY) + +TO: All counsel on the attached Counsel List + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys will take deposition(s) of: + +# NAME AND ADDRESS tit TIME LOCATION + +Donnie September 7, 2011 1242 SW Briarwood Drive 11:00 AM Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 + +r. O + +Atlantic Reporting 201. SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. #108 Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 772.344.6150 + +# \*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING: + +Any and all documents\*\* reflecting or relating to services rendered: + +- I. at or in the general vicinity of 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480-4730; and +- 2. for the benefit of or at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger + +including but not limited to documents reflecting when the services were performed, how long they were performed, the nature of the services, and by whom they were performed. + +11; S upon oral examination before Atlantic Reporting, a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes or Rules. + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been famished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 6th day of September 2011. + +> Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 William B. Florida Bar No.: 181773 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 f Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for + +cc: Atlantic Reporting @ atlscheduling@bellsouth.net + +E-TRANSCRIPT. CONDENSED, ASCII, CD AND/OR D'VD REQUESTED + ++ 0 + +## COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +E Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein C Fax: (561)-802-9976 + +Marc S. Nurik IC7 11.41r. marc@nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein + +F PaWeinberg, Esquire Weinberg, P.C. Plaza, S.uite 1000 Suffolk, • 02116 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein + +"If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact, Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711." + +"Si usted es una persona minusvalida que necesita algal] acomodamiento para poder participar en este procedimiento, usted tiene derecho, sin tener gastos propios, a que se le provea cierta ayuda. Tenga la amabilidad de ponerse en contacto con Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 si usted tiene discapatacion del oido o de la voz, (lame al 711." + +"Si ou se yon moun ki enfim ki bezwen akomoilasyon pou w ka patisipe nan pwosedi sa, ou kalifye san ou pa gen okenn lajan pou w peye, gen pwovizyon pou jwen kek ed. Tanpri kontakte Court Administration, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Suite 217, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986; (772)807-4370; 1-800-955-8771 si ou gen pwoblem pou w tande oubyen pale, rele 711." «)wv if + +Fr \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22fb3c7fc1a93f4d8f1c36962b75d5e91d49343a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063/EFTA02770063.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770063.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 4085, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.26, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "RE-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 416.61907958984375, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 416.61907958984375, + 323.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 323.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NAME AND ADDRESS tit TIME LOCATION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 73.44, + 419.0012512207031 + ], + [ + 456.74835205078125, + 419.0012512207031 + ], + [ + 456.74835205078125, + 444.83209228515625 + ], + [ + 73.44, + 444.83209228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 244.8, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 345.78, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 244.8, + 439.83000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 455.93999999999994, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 385.56000000000006, + 439.83000000000004 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "*DUCES TECUM: TO HAVE AND BRING WITH YOU AT THE TIME OF \nTHE DEPOSITION THE FOLLOWING:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 542.5565185546875, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 542.5565185546875, + 566.3759460449219 + ], + [ + 67.32000000000001, + 566.3759460449219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.00899999999996, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 351.0882873535156, + 86.22802734375 + ], + [ + 256.00899999999996, + 86.22802734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770063" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99d403bf845d89f9427ce581ed9543b2e94e7d20 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +PlaintifflCounter-Defendant, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually and J. individually, + +Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. + +O + +## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION VF HEARING (Uniform Motion Calendar) + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned is canceling the hearing before the Honorable David F. M, one of of the above-styled Court, in Courtroom 9C at the Palm Beach County Courth 2 S71Vorth Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida on Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., on G. Weinberg's Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via IS/E-mail, El Facsimile, ISIU.S. Mail, O Hand Delivery, El Federal Express on this 7th day of September, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, + +Epstein v. Rothstein and M, etc. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG + +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Weinberg, Esq., G. Weinberg, P.A., 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, ■ **02116.** + +> **sep L. Ack an, Jr. tki• ??..)** + +**Florida Bar No. 235954** N 91,n, West n . + +BURN O 777 South Flagler DLitt ' West Palm Beach, Flora 33401 Telephone: (y54) 802-9044 Facsimile: \) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1844979887fc1cb611f0a830dc66b79248635055 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067/EFTA02770067.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770067.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1696, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.251, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 463.7481994628906, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 463.7481994628906, + 119.613037109375 + ], + [ + 147.251, + 119.613037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CANCELLATION VF HEARING \n(Uniform Motion Calendar)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 177.18999999999997, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 430.15386962890625, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 430.15386962890625, + 384.75 + ], + [ + 177.18999999999997, + 384.75 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.015, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 385.8680725097656, + 534.6 + ], + [ + 385.8680725097656, + 548.613037109375 + ], + [ + 223.015, + 548.613037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770067" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..568ebcae01a31b850d22be66eae171c5a5cb0ab2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +FILED +2011 SEP 12 PM 3:31 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +AGREED ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on [REDACTED] G. Weinberg, Esquire's Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, in the above-styled case. This Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, is Granted. [REDACTED] G. Weinberg, Esquire is hereby discharged as counsel of record for the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, in this action and is further relieved of any further obligation, duties or responsibilities in this case. + +DONE AND ORDERED in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 12th day of September, 2011. + +![]()Epstein v. Rothstein and etc. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Agreed Order on Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record Page 2 of 2 + +Copies furnished to: + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola Searcy Denn, Esq. ey Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +CO ASY + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 'S 4)9 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. ( S" Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 2 + +**G. Weinberg, Esq. G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, 0211p** + +**+O8'** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd25f05fe6887f3527577dc759ed7f3d230d787a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069/EFTA02770069.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770069.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1941, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 463.89599999999996, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 463.89599999999996, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 90.576, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 517.752, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 517.752, + 354.78000000000003 + ], + [ + 90.576, + 354.78000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770069" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d5b13e76d660342085e8b47cb921c523e99ee95 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.md @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN +AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, +FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], +individually, + +Defendants. + +Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 + +Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXX MBAG + +CLEARANCE BOOK, CLERK +CIRCUIT CIVIL 4 +FILED +11 SEP 22 PM 12:28 + +**PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN +OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] +MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ASSERT A CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE +DAMAGES AND SUPPLEMENT THERETO** + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby offers the following response in opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages ("Motion") and supplement thereto, and states: + +**SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT** + +[REDACTED] rambling, kitchen-sink motion for leave to add a punitive damages claim against Epstein is factually and legally insufficient, if not frivolous. [REDACTED] seeks punitive damages on the grounds that the claims against [REDACTED] in Epstein's initial Complaint -- *not the pending Corrected Second Amended Complaint* -- are baseless because he was not involved in the Ponzi scheme and did not pump the cases; the fraudulent presentation to investors did not harm Epstein; the RICO and fraud claims in the initial Complaint required actual knowledge; the original abuse of process claim is barred by the litigation privilege; Epstein intended to block + +discovery when he filed his lawsuit; and adverse inferences from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment defeat his claims. Not a single one of arguments withstands scrutiny because the alleged insufficiency of a claim, or inability to prove a claim, is not a basis for punitive damages, particularly when, as is true in this case, that prior claim has been withdrawn. Even assuming arguendo that it could be found that a claim was unsupported when filed, does not, and cannot, cite a single case holding that the filing of an unsupported claim is itself sufficient to provide a reasonable basis for this Court to grant leave to plead punitive damages. Such conduct simply does not, as a matter of law, establish a wanton disregard of M ' rights with the "knowledge and present consciousness not simply that a statute or right will be violated but that injury will result." Genesis Publ'ns v. Goss, 437 So. 2d 169, 170-71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Stated differently, Edwards cannot pursue a §57.105, Fla. Stat., motion in the guise of a motion to assert punitive damages, as he is unquestionably attempting to do. Although has proffered evidence in an attempt to refute Epstein's allegations, the fact that merely disputes or denies Epstein's claims and has raised various affirmative defenses does not — by any stretch of the imagination — demonstrate that Epstein's filing of his initial Complaint evinces the requisite recklessness or wantonness. Id. If the failure "to state a cause of action is not, in and of itself, a sufficient basis to support a finding that a claim was so lacking, in merit as to justify an award of fees pursuant to section 57.105.", Mason v. Highlands Cty. Bd. of County Commr's, 817 So. 2d 922, 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), then proffer of evidence and argument purporting to show only that Epstein has not stated, or cannot prove, his claims against certainly cannot provide a reasonable basis for pleading punitive damages. + +In addition, M' demand for punitive damages is unavailing insofar as he has no basis to seek any damages because his own Counterclaim fails to state a valid claim for abuse of process. MIM' Counterclaim fails to state a valid claim for abuse of process because it is based solely on Epstein's filing of his complaint, rather than any post-filing misconduct. + +In sum, M' motion for leave to assert punitive damages ignores the applicable law, obscures the issues, and, significantly, makes no effort to address the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, which show a clear link between and Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. See 1¶ 20-24 of Corrected Second Amended Complaint. M' motion must be denied. + +## STATEMENT OF THE CASE + +On December 7, 2009, Epstein, represented by prior counsel, filed a Complaint against for violation of §772.101, Fla. Stat. (Count I), "Florida RICO" (Count II), abuse of process (Count III), fraud (Count IV) and conspiracy to commit fraud (unnumbered). On December 21, 2009, filed an Answer and Counterclaim. In his Counterclaim, purported to state a claim against Epstein for abuse of process based upon allegations that: Epstein had asserted his Fifth Amendment rights (¶6); Epstein sought to avoid liability by "employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims into abandoning their legitimate claims or resolving these claims for substantially less than their just value" (id.); am. conduct in the underlying lawsuits was proper (¶8); and Epstein filed the instant lawsuit "to intimidate M, L.M. and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value." (¶9) + +On or about October 10, 2010, filed a motion for summary judgment on the Complaint, raising the same arguments that he now advances in support of punitive damages. On October 19, 2010, filed his first motion for leave to assert punitive damages on the + +grounds that there was no evidence supporting Epstein's claims against him; Epstein had not sustained any damages; Epstein did not intend to meet his discovery obligations; and Epstein was trying to intimidate and his clients.' + +On January 5, 2011 — while no motion to dismiss was pending — Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his Complaint to delete various allegations and to clarify that his liability in the underlying cases was not at issue. On January 11, 2011, this Court entered an Order denying motion for summary judgment on the grounds that it was premature because Epstein had not been able to obtain records calculated to lead to the discoveryedrnissible evidence and there were privilege issues to resolve. Parenthetically, this sti e case; Epstein's ability to get the necessary discovery remains stayed by this C pril 13, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against with a single count or abuse of process, which then moved to dismiss. + +At a hearing on July 13, 2011, this Court heard argument inter alia on IM motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint and granted the motion with leave to amend. With regard to M' "sword and shield" argument, the Court observed that "we can't really know what the sword/shield doctrine applies to until I know what the lawsuit is about." (Tr. July 13, 2011 at p. 32). The Court also denied motion for leave to amend his counterclaim to plead punitive damages. + +On July 19, 2011, while no complaint by Epstein was even pending, filed a renewed motion for leave to assert punitive damages against Epstein. On July 29, 2011, + +M . complaints of intimidation by E stein and damages as a result thereof de& belief, particularly when at the same time that has complained of this so-called intimidation, he has represented additional clients and sett e cases against Epstein. + +filed a Supplement to Proffer in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages. + +Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint on August 22, 2011, which contains a single count against for abuse of process. Epstein filed a Corrected Second Amended Complaint on August 24, 2011. + +## ARGUMENT + +#### A. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSERTING PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +Tellingly, renewed motion for leave to assert punitive damages completely ignores the standards that must be satisfied in order for the Court to grant leave to to assert a claim for punitive damages — as if such standards did not exist. This omission is perhaps understandable, however, because any attemp by to apply the clear legal standards to his proffer and arguments would prove f to motion. It is glaring omission that requires us to detail below the sta r t must be satisfied for leave to assert a claim for punitive damages in Florida. + +Before a party is permitted to allege punitive damages, he must comply with the requirements of §768.72(1), Fla. Stat. (2011), which provides in pertinent part, as follows: + +> y civil action, no claim for punitive damages shall be fitted unless there is a reasonable showing by evidence in the ecord or proffered by the claimant which would provide a reasonable basis for the recovery of such damages. The claimant may move to amend her or his complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages as allowed by the rules of civil procedure. + +Thus, bears the burden of establishing a reasonable basis for the recovery of punitive damages. See Will v. Systems Engineering Consultants, 554 So. 2d 591, 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). As demonstrated below, has undeniably failed to satisfy his burden of proof of proffering evidence that Epstein's conduct was knowingly or recklessly indifferent to M' rights. + +The case law in Florida is well-established that the character of misconduct necessary to sustain an award of punitive damages is the same as that required to sustain a conviction for manslaughter. Carraway v. Revell, 116 So. 2d 16, 20 (Fla. 1959). See also Tiger Point Golf v. Ripple, 977 So. 2d 608, 610 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)("The conduct punitive damages properly condemns and hopefully deters is willful and wanton misconduct of a character no less culpable than what is neceqqary to convict of criminal manslaughter."). The Florida Supreme Court has also explained that the type of evidence necessary to uphold an award of punitive damages "must be of a "gross and flagrant character, evincing ... reckless indifference to the rights of others which is equivalent to an intentional violation of them." Construction Co. v. Dupont, 455 So. 2d 1026, 1029 (Fla. 1984)(evidence that an 80,000 pound loader was knowingly operated at top speed with no brakes in the area where people were working was not sufficient to submit the issue of punitive damages to thejuryXcitation omitted). See also Chrysler Corp. v. Wolmer, 499 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla. 1986)(ct st did not put automobile manufacturer on notice of fuel system defects and did not ro Me manufacturer with actual knowledge that it was marketing an inherently dangerous automobile, and thus did not support conclusion that manufacturer acted with wanton disregard of life equivalent to manslaughter so as to support an award of punitive damages). 2 + +2 See also American Cyanamid Co. v. Roy, 498 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1986)(punitive damages were not warranted where the conduct of a toxic chemical manufacturer in failing to warn of the effects of its product did not reach the willful and wanton level in the absence of evidence indicating an entire lack of care); Como Oil Co., Inc. v. O'Loughlin, 466 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1985)(evidence that a gas truck that was filling an underground storage tank was dirty, grimy, leaked and lacked a safety device on the filler nozzle, and that the driver of the truck did not use + +The Florida Legislature codified the foregoing standards for imposing punitive damages via its enactment of the 1999 Tort Reform Act, which added three subsections to §768.72, Fla. Stat., see §768.72(2)-(4), Fla. Stat. (2005), and in doing so, made it perfectly clear that the ability to claim punitive damages is not automatic and is not subject to the traditional liberal philosophy of allowing amendments to pleadings. It is a substantive right of every defendant not to be subject to a punitive damages claim and the associated financial net worth discovery -- that is often oppressive -- unless the standards under the statute and supportin are met with evidence. + +Subsection (2) of §768.72 states as follows: + +(2) A defendant may be held liable for pur'vidamages only if the trier of fact, based on clear and convincing evidence, finds that the defendant was personally guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence. As used in this section, the term: + +> (a) "Intentional misconduct" means that the defendant had actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and the high probability that injury or damage to the claimant would result and, despite that knowledge, intentionally pursued that course of conduct, resulting in injury or damage. + +> (b) "Gross negligence" means that the defendant's conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or rights of persons exposed to such conduct. + +"\I"•\- + +What is clear is that even if there were evidence of an intentional tort, that does "not necessarily [support] an award of punitive damages. [Citation omitted] Proof of the elements of + +a dipstick to measure the gas level of the tank before pumping gas and letting 350 gallons of gas overflow, thereby causing the gas to ignite and the plaintiff working nearby to be burned and thrown by the explosion, did not support an award of punitive damages). + +tortious interference may be established even though the evidence does not justify an award of punitive damages." Air Ambulance Professionals, Inc. v. Thin Air, 809 So. 2d 28, 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(although the jury found that one business partner breached his fiduciary duty to the other, the evidence did not "show the type of gross and flagrant behavior on his part that is required for a punitive damage award."). See also Jack Eckerd Corp. v. 558 So. 2d 1060, 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)(in malicious prosecution action, legal malice which may be inferred from the absence of probable cause is not sufficient to support punitive damages unless "it encompasses a showing of moral turpitude or willful and wanton disregard of the plaintiff's rights, which presupposes the defendant's knowledge or awareness of the risk to plaintiffs rights, or evidence of excessive and reckless disregard of the plaintiffs rights. Legal malice based solely upon the want of probable cause is not sufficient to support an award of punitive damages."); Genesis Publ'ns, 437 So. 2d at 170-71 (the court held that the publishing of a photograph of plaintiff without her permission in violation of a statute did not support the imposition of punitive damages, and that the "terms 'recklessness, wantonness and willfulness,' when used to justify punitive damages implies a knowledge and present consciousness not simply that a statute or right will be viola ed but that injury will result."); Wrains v. M, 175 So. 2d 75, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)(" iv proof of an intentional tort does not ipso facto entitle the plaintiff to punitive damages.' + +> B. HAS NOT ESTABLISHED A "REASONABLE BASIS" FOR ASSERTING PUNITIVE DAMAGES AGAINST EPSTEIN BASED ON EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT OFFERED AGAINST (OR ATTEMPTING TO REFUTE) EPSTEIN'S ORIGINAL CLAIMS OR BY OFFERING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES + +laundry list of arguments and evidence attempting to refute Epstein's claims against him is based on the utterly flawed and unsupported legal premise that the filing itself of an allegedly deficient complaint (even one claimed to be frivolous) provides a reasonable basis for pleading punitive damages. There is no merit whatsoever to principal argument (motion at 5-20) that he is entitled to plead punitive damages against Epstein simply because he has proffered evidence that attempts to dispute Epstein's initial claims against him or because those claims allegedly were not actionable. Punitive damages are not recoverable for the filing of a deficient or even frivolous claim. While attorney's fees may be recoverable pursuant to §57.105, Fla. Stat., for the filing of a baseless claim, neither §57.105, Fla. Stat., nor any other provision of Florida law, authorizes punitive damages for the filing of a purportedly frivolous claim because such conduct does not demonstrate "actual knowledge of the wrongfulness of the conduct and the high probability that damage . . . would result" and intentional pursuit of such conduct, resulting in damage, or "conscious disregard or indifference to the rights of persons exposed to such conduct." Section 768.72(2). Such reprehensible conduct is clearly not shown by the filing of an assertedly frivolous complaint. + +Assuming arguendo that the filing of a baseless complaint were sufficient to permit leave to assert punitive damages, which it is not, M' motion must still be denied because he has done no more than attempt to refute some of Epstein's allegations, while arguing that his conduct was privileged and that Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment evinces bad faith or creates adverse inferences. None of this evidence or argument provides a valid, legal basis for pleading punitive damages. proffer is patently insufficient and must be rejected. + +# 1. Ponzi Scheme, Fraudulent Pitches and Pumping Allegations + +argues (motion at 6-7) that Epstein's original claims had no merit because was not involved in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, as claimed in his affidavit and at his deposition, a deposition where refused to answer many of the questions asked of him + +because of privilege and as to which a motion to compel is still pending. The filing of purportedly insufficient claims does not provide a basis for pleading punitive damages. And the fact that has since denied active involvement in the Ponzi scheme falls critically short of establishing that Epstein acted with the requisite culpability for the imposition of exemplary damages. also contends (motion at 8-11) that Epstein's negligence claim was insufficient and that his alleged constructive notice of the Ponzi scheme was not sufficient to support the RICO and fraud claims, which required criminal intent. As noted earlier, a argument is addressed to claims that are no longer part of the compitt and have not been for some time. More importantly, however, the filing of defici does not itself establish a basis for punitive damages. If that were the case, Rive damages would be awarded every time a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment was granted. Such is clearly not the case. This is but another red herring. + +also protests "for the sake of completeness" (motion at 10) that he was duped by Rothstein. But a conduct alleged in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint - particularly in paragraphs 20-24, which are largely based on Edward's own privilege log and sworn testimony -- presents the classic jury question of whether was more than constructively aware of Rothstein's conduct. This is more than sufficient to defeat a motion to assert punitive damages. Moreover, is in no position to seek punitive damages, based on this so- called lack of evidence as to his involvement, when, at every turn, he has blocked Epstein's efforts to obtain valid discovery. In any event, a mere denial of the allegations in the initial Complaint is not a sufficient basis for pleading punitive damages. L By the same token, a argument (motion at 8) that he is entitled to plead punitive + +damages because Epstein "seems to have alleged" that he was harmed by Rothstein's + +misrepresentations to investors is patently frivolous. Punitive damages obviously cannot be based upon uncertain interpretation of various allegations in a now-superseded complaint. The ultimate inability to prove certain damages, or even a claim, is not a legal basis for asserting punitive damages. As explained in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hooks, 463 So. 2d 468, 474 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the court held that the wrongful issuance of a writ of replevin did not support an award of punitive damages: "This theory would open the door to an award of pUnitive damages in every instance in which a party is ultimately unsuccee his resort to the court in pursuit of a legal remedy." The same is true here. + +Equally irrelevant is M' argument (Motion alleged in the initial Complaint that he was the victim ) that Epstein improperly eme to "pump" the cases because he did not settle them until after left RRA and t contrary to ¶42(h), =I cases had "substantial value." (Id at 19). Even if Epstein's allegations were improper -- which they were not -- baseless allegations in a complaint do not provide a basis for pleading punitive damages. Moreover, the timing of the payment of the settlements in those cases does not prove that Epstein's cases were not used to further the Ponzi scheme, and certainly does not establish any basis for asserting punitive damages. It is without doubt that Rothstein used a victim cases against Epstein to attract investors in October, 2009. Epstein has alleged this in detail in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. See 1110,15-18,22,24,26. Moreover, the fact that Epstein settled the cases for a certain amount does not constitute an admission of liability or negate what did in the litigation. Those cases were settlements by and between Epstein and the respective plaintiffs and did not release or purport to settle claims Epstein has against Rothstein and Epstein can agree to make payments to the plaintiffs in those cases and still pursue damages for the wrongful conduct of and Rothstein that caused those + +payments to be incurred. See City of Tallahassee v. Blankenship & Lee, 736 So. 2d 29, 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). + +Finally, there is no merit to argument that he is entitled to assert punitive damages because his clients' cases against Epstein were filed before he joined RRA. The mere fact that filed those cases before he joined RRA does not necessarily mean that did not commit abuse of process related to those cases after he joined, as alleged in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. See 11¶30-32. + +CP + +'Ii., IM argument (motion at 12-20) that he is entitle to plead punitive damages because the litigation privilege provides an absolute bar to Epstein's original abuse of process claim is wrong on several levels. To recover ok -i ( aim for abuse of process, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove: (1) that the defendant made an illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; and (2) that the defendant had ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process; and (3) that as a result of such action on the part of the defendant, the plaintiff suffered damage. S&I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 36 So. 3d 909, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Peckins v. Kaye, 443 So. 2d 1025, 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) ("The abuse consists not in the issuance of process, but rather in the perversion of the process after its issuance. The writ or process must be used in a manner, or for a purpose for which it is not by law intended."). Although counsel for has conceded that his claim against Epstein is not malicious prosecution, it is an irrelevant malicious prosecution standard that is improperly trying to interject. + +# 2. Litigation Privilege + +In addition, the filing of a claim that is assertedly subject to an affirmative defense is not a legally sufficient basis for asserting punitive damages. Second, the litigation privilege, which + +is an affirmative defense, does not categorically bar an abuse of process claim. Under Florida law, there is no immunity for acts undertaken in judicial proceedings that bear no relation to, and are not in furtherance of, those proceedings. See, e.g., Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 616, 608 (1994). The Corrected Second Amended Complaint identifies conduct outside the protections of the litigation privilege, because went beyond the activity protected by the privilege. See ¶¶ 30-33. It is for a fact finder to determine whether acts were in furtherance of the judicial proceedings or were intended for some other purpose. At most, M' protest that he acted ethically, conducted proper discovery, and had a proper motive, creates issues of fact, or legal issues which might possibly be decided on summary judgment, but fails to provide the necessary independent predicate for the assertion of punitive damages, particularly where the allegations in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint clearly set forth a basis to link to Rothstein's scheme. Regardless of the quantum or nature of proof or the proffer that has marshaled to refute Epstein's abuse of process claim, the fact remains that has failed to demonstrate that Epstein's conduct a to a level evincing wantonness or reckless indifference to M I rights, so as to support punitive damages.3 + +3Edward? argument (Motion at 13-14) that allegations regarding misconduct in connection with the underlying litigation are barred by res judicata is invalid. The doctrine of res judicata applies only if there is an identity of parties and claims, which is clearly not the case elim v. Pan American Airways Corp., 889 So. 2d 149, 153 ( Fla. 4th DCA 2004). was not a party in any of the underlying cases. cites no authority holding that an independent abuse of process claim cannot be based on prior, concluded litigation. To the contrary, the "t act doctrine" allows Epstein to make claims for damages unnecessarily incurred due to conduct. See Arling v. State of Florida, 559 So. 2d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) ("It is well established that attorneys' fees incurred in litigation with a third party may be a recoverable element of damage in a civil action if that litigation was caused by the defendant's wrongful act."). + +### 3. Amendment of the Complaint + +makes much of the fact that the RICO, criminal practices, and fraud claims were dropped from the initial Complaint, thus "confirm[ing] that no reasonable basis ever existed to support any belief in the truth of those allegations" and that the mere filing of an amended complaint warrants punitive damages. (Motion at 2). This argument is specious. No reasonable inference of culpable conduct sufficient to support punitive damages can be drawn from the fact that a party chooses, or is granted leave, to amend his or her complaint, and in so doing, omits certain claims or allegations. cites no decisional authority teport his contention. If that were the appropriate standard for asserting punitive n, in clear contravention of §768.72(2)-(4), Fla. Stat., punitive damages would beco + +# 4. Sword And Shield Doctrine + +There is also no merit to IM contention that he is entitled to seek punitive damages because Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege in response to certain questions asked by at Epstein's deposition taken in the instant case, which contends proves that Epstein did not intend to permit discovery when he filed the lawsuit. (Motion at 20-22). This argument is nonsensical for several reasons. First, has not offered a scintilla of proof that Epstein was planning to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights at the time he filed his initial Complaint. Epstein's invocation of his constitutional rights in response to certain questions asked at a deposition taken months after he filed suit reveals nothing about his intent when he initiated the litigation. + +Second, M' contention that invocation of the Fifth Amendment during a deposition is so reprehensible as to support the imposition of punitive damages is meritless, particularly when the questions asked of Epstein, and as to which he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege, + +were not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The "sword and shield doctrine" embraces the rule 'that a plaintiff may not seek affirmative relief in a civil action and then invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid giving discovery in matters pertinent to the litigation."' Delis' v. Bankers, Ins. Co., 436 So. 2d 1099, 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (quoting City of St. Petersburg v. Houghton, 362 So. 2d 681, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (emphasis added)). See also Brancaccio v. Mediplex Mgmt. of Port St. Lucie, Inc., 711 So. 2d 1206, 1208-1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (approving City of St. Petersburg and Village Inn Rest v. Aridi, 543 So. 2d 778,782 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), in which the First District agreed that "sanctions may be necessary where a plaintiff in a civil action invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against revealing relevant information in pretrial discovery." (emphasis added)). The Fourth District explained in Brancaccio that the "Supreme Court has disapproved of procedures which require a party to surrender one constitutional right in order to assert another..." 711 So. 2d, at 1210. Thus, a "civil defendant [does not] have an absolute right to have the action dismissed any time a plaintiff invokes his constitutional privilege." + +Here, the information sought from Epstein had nothing to do with any of the parties' claims or defenses. Rather, asked highly inflammable questions relating to sexual conduct\_and criminal misconduct that were not designed to, and would not, provide any information relevant to Epstein's abuse of process claims in the instant case or defense of those claims. Numerous questions regarding Epstein's allegedly illegal sexual activities with minors and whether nationally-prominent acquaintances engaged in illegal sexual activities (see Epstein Deposition at 89-95), would clearly not lead to the discovery of evidence relevant to the + +instant case, and were asked solely to poison the well .4 Indeed, this Court has already sustained objections to such discovery. Significantly, a review of Epstein's deposition demonstrates that he answered questions relevant to the subject litigation, including why he was suing L.M., the Ponzi scheme, and his damages. (See, e.g., Epstein Deposition at 13-14, 19-20, 23, 25, 28-30, 33, 36-8, 48-50, 52, 63, 65, 83, 101). + +M , who filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process, has persistently refused to produce hundreds of pages of substantive documents, instead furnishing a 159- page privilege log that contains many entries that on their face are clearly not privileged. Under these circumstances, little credence ought to be given to argument that Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege in response to irrelevant discovery requests -- which was entirely justified -- somehow supports a claim for punitive damages. + +## S. Adverse Inferences + +M' final argument (Motion at 22-5) that he is entitled to punitive damages on the basis of adverse inferences to be drawn from Epstein's assertion of the Fifth Amendment is untenable. First, Epstein's ability or lack of ability to prove his allegations given adverse inferences that may be drawn does not, by any measure, establish a basis for punitive damages based on a wanton disregard for rights. Moreover, the "reasonable inferences" that + +4 Edwards' counsel asked Plaintiff whether he socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of women under the age of 18. Plaintiff responded by invoking his right against selfincrimination. (Epstein Deposition at 89). Plaintiff also refused to answer the number of times he "engaged in oral sex with females under the age of 18." (Id. at 110). + +In Boys & Girls Club of Marion County, Inc. v. J.A., 22 So. 3d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009), upon which relies, the court noted that a plaintiff cannot avoid "legitimate" discovery and that a party "is entitled to the discovery contemplated by the rules in order to ascertain the facts and fairly present its defenses." The questions to which Epstein invoked his i all inst self-incrimination were not asked "to ascertain the facts and fairly present ] defenses." Id. + +asks this Court to draw (see Motion at 23-24) — that Epstein was on a private plane "while sexual assaults were taking place" or that he had physical contact with certain minors - are not probative of Epstein's claims against for abuse of process, let alone probative of whether Epstein's allegations against reflect the "type of gross and flagrant behavior on [Epstein's] part that is required for a punitive damages award." Thin Air, 809 So. 2d at 30.5 Again, a' argument is a red herring and must be rejected. + +#### C. CANNOT SEEK PUNITIVE DAMAGES BECAUSE HIS COUNTERCLAIM FAILS AS A MATTER OF LAW + +It is axiomatic that cannot seek punitiv dat ges from Epstein because a Counterclaim for abuse of process fails to Counterclaim is based solely on allegations that Csteins filing of an insufficient complaint against him constitutes abuse of process. Under settled Florida law, however, the tort of abuse of process requires proof that the judicial system was misused for an ulterior purpose after an action is filed and process served. See, e.g.; Della-Donna v. Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); McMurray v. U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209-10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Thus, the filing of an action does not itself constitute abuse of process. Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1056. Because a alleges only that Epstein abused process by filing id claim for relief. a + +5 Edwards filed a supplement to his "proffer," consisting of Epstein's response to a Request for Production served June 9, 2011. Based on that response, asserts i tein does not have and has never had any documentary support for his contention that had knowledge about Rothstein's commission of . . . fraud . . . ." Significantly, Epstein stated in his response to that request for production that due to a objections to Epstein's request for such documents, all documents could not be produced. However, certain documents in Epstein's man were responsive. Thus, contrary to contention, Epstein's response to for production does not demonstrate that Epstein has no documentary support. is estopped to argue that Epstein's failure to produce extensive documentation is a basis for to recover punitive damages. + +an unfounded complaint against him, his Counterclaim is not actionable, and absent a viable Counterclaim, cannot plead or prove any damages, let alone punitive damages. + +## CONCLUSION + +Based on the foregoing arguments and authorities, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order denying Defendant/Counter -Plaintiff motion for leave to assert a claim for punitive damages, and lifrant such other and further relief as deemed necessary and proper. + +O + +Respectfully submitted, C + +B + +J eph L. • ckerrnan, Es Fla. Bar No. 235954 FOWLERM BURNETT, P.A. r 901 Point West y 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +and + +E. Knight Fla. Bar. No. 607363 BURNETT, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE** + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail +and U.S. Mail this 21st day of September, 2011 to: + +Jack Scarola, Esq. +Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A +2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. +West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. +Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. +250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 +West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik +One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 +Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +By: + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7224e0bb4c4a4bd62042d53f00cee796c62a4c1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071/EFTA02770071.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1049 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770071.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 19, + "chars": 35261, + "elapsed_seconds": 42.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 513.468, + 70.47 + ], + [ + 513.468, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 125.55000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ASSERT A CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND SUPPLEMENT THERETO", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 512.856, + 320.76 + ], + [ + 512.856, + 375.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 375.84000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 383.724, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 511.11 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF THE CASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.82, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 385.0694580078125, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 385.0694580078125, + 319.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 220.82, + 319.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.74, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.60589599609375, + 221.13000000000002 + ], + [ + 341.60589599609375, + 237.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 264.74, + 237.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSERTING PUNITIVE \nDAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.86, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 468.3824157714844, + 247.04999999999998 + ], + [ + 468.3824157714844, + 276.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 137.86, + 276.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Ponzi Scheme, Fraudulent Pitches and Pumping Allegations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 142.596, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 464.8832702636719, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 464.8832702636719, + 624.1074981689453 + ], + [ + 142.596, + 624.1074981689453 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Litigation Privilege", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 210.105, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 326.6539001464844, + 274.59000000000003 + ], + [ + 326.6539001464844, + 291.11248779296875 + ], + [ + 210.105, + 291.11248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Amendment of the Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 218.73799999999997, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 388.13616943359375, + 82.62 + ], + [ + 388.13616943359375, + 97.67999267578125 + ], + [ + 218.73799999999997, + 97.67999267578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "4. Sword And Shield Doctrine", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.237, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 381.9898681640625, + 356.4 + ], + [ + 381.9898681640625, + 372.86248779296875 + ], + [ + 224.237, + 372.86248779296875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "S. Adverse Inferences", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.22000000000003, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 361.12628173828125, + 387.18 + ], + [ + 361.12628173828125, + 402.35302734375 + ], + [ + 245.22000000000003, + 402.35302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. CANNOT SEEK PUNITIVE DAMAGES \nBECAUSE HIS COUNTERCLAIM FAILS AS A MATTER \nOF LAW", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 139.08, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 469.68798828125, + 248.67000000000002 + ], + [ + 469.68798828125, + 291.85748291015625 + ], + [ + 139.08, + 291.85748291015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 259.43399999999997, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 346.4591369628906, + 139.32 + ], + [ + 346.4591369628906, + 154.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 259.43399999999997, + 154.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 98.01 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770071" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27bd0e935d912dba02d4e2cf5304055156bae240 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_/ + +PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN +MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN RESPONSE TO +[REDACTED] MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO ADD PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +COMES NOW the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and respectfully moves this Court for an Order allowing the undersigned counsel leave to exceed the 10 pages limit in the Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ("[REDACTED]") Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages and Supplement Thereto, and as grounds therefore states as follows: + +1. On July 18, 2011, [REDACTED] filed a Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages which is 27 pages long. + +2. On July 29, 2011, [REDACTED] filed a Supplement to his Proffer in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages which is 1 page with a 5-page exhibit. + +3. On August 29, 2011, [REDACTED] filed another Supplement to his Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages which is 1 1/2 pages long. + +SHARON R. BOCK, CL +PALM BEACH COUN. CL +CIRCUIT CIVIL +COPY + +11 SEP 22 PM 12:28 + +FILED + +4. The total number of pages relating to M' Motion for Leave to Amend to Add Punitive Damages is 29 to 30 pages. + +5. This Court's Administrative Rule sets a limit of 10 pages for Motions and Responses: "My Memorandums submitted are limited to 10 double-spaced pages." + +6. Epstein has made every effort to prepare a Response in Opposition to the Motion for Punitive Damages that is 10 pages or less. However, given the length of the Motion and the number of issues that need a response, the best that Epstein can do is respond in approximately 18 pages of text. + +spaced pages limit. 7. Epstein requests leave to file a Ress il' xcess of the Court's 10 doubleti + +8. There is no prejudice / to icularly since his Motion and supplements thereto are well in excess of the Co limit. + +9. Undersigned certifies ht is Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. + +10. Undersigned certifies that an attempt has been made and will continue to be made to resolve this issue without the need of a hearing. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting his Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Response to MI' Motion for Leave to Amend to Add Punitive Damages for the reasons set forth above, or alternatively require Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff to re-file his Motion within the Court's page limit. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail on this 21" day of September, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +L. Jleke an, Jr. rida Bar No. 235954 + +BURNETT, P.A. Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +and + +E. Knight Florida Bar. No. 607363 + +BURNETT, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9aadd7b2a3cdadfbd81ba6f3053b090b731f2a11 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090/EFTA02770090.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770090.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3865, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.59, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 146.4, + 38.88 + ], + [ + 461.77000000000004, + 38.88 + ], + [ + 461.77000000000004, + 67.23 + ], + [ + 146.4, + 67.23 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 387.0423889160156, + 125.55000000000001 + ], + [ + 387.0423889160156, + 140.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 140.6080322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770090" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e3fb02db292f7f65208678ea6f11c4ba7ee4474 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, + +J. individually, Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 73," >=. + +Case No. 502009CA0408004pCM! Division AG + +m n c) ,. rl nr N 3 r-: 'in N3 J • rn + +## PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MOTION TO DISMISS THE CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT + +Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY E IVEPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby offers the folio se in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff a') Motion to Dismiss the Corrected Second Amended Complaint and states: + +two-page, five-paragraph Motion to Dismiss is perfunctory and conclusory. EPSTEIN's Corrected Second Amended Complaint satisfies each and every element of the abuse of mow cause of action with allegations that made perverted use of process, h 'or purpose in doing so, and caused damages to EPSTEIN, and O n has no ed otherwise. bare-bones Motion to Dismiss does not cite a single supporting authority, and contains no valid arguments warranting dismissal. + +2. Initially, it must be noted that this litigation has at its core a law firm which has been described by a U.S. Attorney as a criminal enterprise. Its founder, Scott Rothstein partner — is currently serving a 50-year sentence in federal prison for selling fake + +settlements to unsuspecting investors. Through the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), Rothstein and others in this criminal enterprise conducted a \$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme which was perpetrated with fake agreements, forged signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what was essentially legal extortion, Rothstein persuaded investors that he could pressure defendants, including EPSTEIN, into paying astronomical settlements and further defrauded investors by convincing them to purchase fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, including those falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA for EDWARD' clients with claims against EPSTEIN, to the detriment of EPSTEIN. Defendant made improper use of the judicial system and civil process by inter alia filing a complaint in federal court, although a state court complaint had been pending on behalf of the same plaintiff for almost a year, engaged in unreasonable and vexatious discovery and motion practice in certain underlying actions against EPSTEIN, and made unfounded and highly charged sexual allegations in these underdog actions, all of which caused damage to EPSTEIN. + +3. tion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits all well-pleaded facts of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint as true, and the allegations and reasonable inferences therefrom must be construed in the light most favorable to EPSTEIN. Sall v. Ruden, McClosky, Schuster &=, P.A., 742 So. 2d 381,383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). See also Morris v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 753 So. 2d 153, 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("[A] complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action 'unless the movant can establish beyond any doubt that the claimant could prove no set of facts whatever in support of his claim."). has utterly failed to meet his substantial burden of establishing "beyond any doubt" that EPSTEIN cannot prove any set of facts and circumstances which support his abuse of process claim. + +4. first argument that the "Introduction" to the Corrected Second Amended Complaint is "surplusage apparently intended to defame Mr. . . ." does not, on its face, state a legally recognized basis for dismissal of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. Defendant l ' critique of the "Introduction" of indicate any substantive deficiencies in the abuse of process claim, and it should bQ rej ted and disregarded by this Court. + +5. Equally baseless and legally merit) " It ARDS' contention that the Corrected Second Amended Complaint does not identifythe "process," the first element of the cause of action, that was allegedly abusive, or when, or on whom, it was served. misapprehends the nature of an abuse of process claim. Under Florida law, the tort of abuse of process requires proof that the judicial system was misused for an ulterior purpose after an action was filed and process served. See, e.g., Della-Donna v. Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); McMurray v. U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209-10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The filing of a lawsuit, with an ulterior motive of harassment, which is what argues, does not constitute abuse of process. Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1056. Furthermore, Defendant blatantly ignores the numerous instances of actionable abuse of process by which are meticulously and with great detail outlined in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. (See Corrected Second Amended Complaint II 30-33). For example, Paragraph 30(c) alleges that "Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to [Attorney] Legamaro and [his client, potential investor] Ritchie [on or + +about October 13, 2009] and that it was prepared by with highly-charged sexual allegations solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Actions and advance the Ponzi scheme, as demonstrated by the fact that never served Epstein with a summons and complaint in that federal action, which action was filed long after filed and served a state court civil action on behalf of L.M." Paragraph 31 asserts that "[o]n or about October 17, 2009, MI, who had filed a state complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed M' assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., like the one had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M." Paragraph 32 then states ``MI also made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process in order to bolster the case to investors by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary `discovery,' making unfounded allegations, and engaging in improper motion practice," and sets forth ten (10) different and specific instances of abuse of process. Thus EPSTEIN has sufficiently pled the C first element, the process that w b + +6. =also looks the allegations in Paragraph 33, which expressly identify l e specific "ulterior motives for making these improper uses of civil process," the second element of the tort. + +7 a next argument - that the Corrected Second Amended Complaint does not "articulate a cognizable theory of damages" caused by his wrongdoing - is not supported by Florida law. Actual damages, as opposed to a "theory of damages," is all that Florida jurisprudence requires a claimant to allege. See Valdes v. GAB Robins N. Am., Inc., 924 So. 2d 862, 867 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (an abuse of process cause of action requires "damage to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's action"), rev. den., 949 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 2007). + +Additionally, flatly ignores the allegations of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint at i 34, that set forth the damages caused by his abuse of process (i.e. "additional and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs"). Moreover, nominal damages, as well as attorneys' fees and costs are sufficient to support a claim for abuse of process. See, e.g., Stoler v. Levinson, 394 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Thus EPSTEIN has satisfactorily pled the third element of the claim. + +8. Equally flawed is Defendant's penultimate argument that the Corrected Second Amended Complaint does not "identify any conduct outside the protection of the litigation privilege." fails to advance any legal analysis concerning how the litigation privilege applies to the facts asserted and does not cite a single supporting authority requiring dismissal of a complaint based on the litigation privilege. + +9. Furthermore, the litigation privilege is an affirmative defense and has not shown that such a defense appears on the face of the pleading. See Ingalesbe v. Stewart Agency, Inc., 869 So. 2d 30, 34-5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (dismissal of claim for interference with fee contract on basis of litigation immunity reversed where affirmative defense'did not appear on face of complaint). The four corners of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint do not suggest, much less`establish, that any of acts of misconduct were in furtherance of the underlying litigation. See Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, a, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994); SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 702, 710 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (noting that a cause of action for malicious prosecution is not barred by the litigation privilege). That determination must be made + +by the fact finder. The reasoning in Gen. Refractories Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 337 F.3d 297, 312 (3d Cir. 2003) makes EPSTEIN's point very well: + +> GRC mainly argues that the judicial privilege cannot possibly apply to these circumstances because "[i]t is illogical on the one hand to say that discovery abuses and filing frivolous motions can support an abuse of process claim because those actions are incident to the litigation process, and on the other hand to say that those actions are absolutely privileged because they are communications issued in the litigation process." GRC's argument has a good deal of logical appeal. The mere existence of the abuse of process tort is evidence that judicial privilege applies to a much narrower range of activity than the attorney appellees urge. Where judicial process is being perverted, immunity would impede, not further, the interests protected by the judicial privilege. + +Id The Corrected Second Amended Complaint identifies numerous instances of conduct by outside the parameters of the litigation privilege. See Paragraph 5 above and Paragraphs 30-33 of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, the litigation privilege does not categorically bar EPSTEIN's claims. + +10. The litigation privilege is not an absolute bar for any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding; otherwise, the Supreme Court would not have added "...so long as the act has some relationship to the proceeding." Acts that bear no relation to and are not in furtherance of those proceedings do not have immunity. Levitt, at 608. Clearly this does not mean that any act during a judicial proceeding is automatically protected; otherwise, the litigation privilege would act as a bar to perjury and other misconduct, typically punishable by contempt. See Montejo v. Memorial Medical Center, Inc., 935 So.2d 1266, n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (litigation privilege discussed in Levin did not apply when the Court lacked + +jurisdiction and entered a void order.) Even judicial immunity may be lost when a judge acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction, Montejo, n. 3. The Supreme Court in Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barret & Frappier v. M, 950 So.2d 380 (Fla. 2007) did not change the rule that it must have some relation to the proceeding. The four corners of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint do not establish that acts were in furtherance of litigation. To the contrary, EPSTEIN alleges that acts had no relationship to the litigation (see Paragraphs 30-33) and in fact are alleged to be for another purpose (see Paragraph 33). The mere existence of litigation does not attach the privilege to every communication or act between the litigants; rather the communication or act must be analyzed in light of its relation to the litigation. See North Star Capital Acquisition LLC v. Krig, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2009); v. Bureaus Investment Group No. II, LLC, 2009 WL 1973476 (S.D. Fla. 2009). The other cases relied upon by — DelMonico v. Traynor, 50 So.3d 4 (Fla. 4 DCA 2010) and Stewart v. Sun Sentinel Company, 695 So.2d 360 (Fla. 4 DCA 1997) — are not applicable because they address words in pleadings and not the use of proceedings that are unrelated under any circumstances to the action. Certainly acts that are not required or permitted by law in the course of a judicial proceeding are not protected. Levin, Id. + +11. Finally, re liance on arguments he raised in his previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment is unavailing. Obviously, the standards are not the same for a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and a motion for summary judgment. It is wellestablished that on a motion to dismiss, the court is limited to review of only the "four corners" of the complaint. References to another pleading or exhibits is inappropriate. Second, Motion for Summary Judgment was directed to a prior complaint, and + +significantly, the Motion was denied by this Court. has not shown, and cannot possibly show, how a summary judgment motion directed to the allegations of the prior complaint — which was denied on the ground that it was "premature, due to incomplete discovery," a situation that still persists - supports dismissal of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint with new allegations. Moreover, judgment that the facts established that "every action argued in support of summary took was entirely proper"; and that there was no evidence that had an ulterior motive. What the evidence may or may not ultimately prove with respect to the propriety of MEE conduct, and whether he had an ulterior motive, is entirely irrelevant to the issue of whether the allegations in the Corrected Second Amended Complaint, taken as true and with all reasonable inferences therefrom drawn in favor of the Plaintiff, state a valid claim for abuse of process. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN respectfully submits that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Motion to Dismiss the Corrected Second Amended Complaint should be denied. + +## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Motion to Dismiss the Corrected Second Amended Complaint was served on this 21' day of September, 2011 via e-mail and U.S. Mail to Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite + +Epstein v. Rothstein, Case No.. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint + +1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Jae seph L Ackerman, ermaJr. lorida Bar No. 235954 + +MIT, P.A. + +901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 802-9044 Facsimile: (561) 802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff + +and + +E. Knight Florida Bar No. 607363 + +BURNETT, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-9200 Facsimile: (305) 789-9201 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9e07a6eec4e3c040993e2ae98d941cc12a51e26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093/EFTA02770093.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770093.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 15145, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.24, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN \nOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF \nMOTION TO DISMISS THE CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.456, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 521.686767578125, + 296.46 + ], + [ + 521.686767578125, + 339.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 84.456, + 339.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.404, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 387.0411682128906, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 387.0411682128906, + 514.2374877929688 + ], + [ + 222.404, + 514.2374877929688 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770093" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2390bf49f8ab54f140e528661b36f3112ec3241f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOO(MB Judge David F. + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and J. individually, + +Defendants. + +P,< CJ le; lc) c.." 0 rcvo. c. = 0 !:,tn 1.4, 0 + +## AGREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF r" + +## J. ORE TENUS MOTION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM + +THIS MATTER came before the Court on September 28, 2011 on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Ore Tenus Motion to Amend Counterclaim in the above-styled case. This Court having heard the Ore Tenus Motion, being advised that there is no objection to the entry of this Order, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff J. Ore Tenus MotiA Amend Counterclaim is GRANTED. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant shall have fill AA ys from the entry of this Agreed Order to file amendments to his Counterclaim. + +DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Be County, Florida this i i:Lei day of OO -- , 2011 + +David F. C •w Circuit Judge + +Epstein v. Rothstein and etc. Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOCMB/Division AG Agreed Order on Ore Tenus Motion to Amend Counterclaim Page 2 of 2 + +Copies furnished to: + +901 Point West Burnett, P.A. 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +46 48;" L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. CO ' Marc S. Nurik, Esq. AS A)9 ( S 1 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fon Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PS>. ' 250 Australian Avenue, South, uite 1 Opp West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5432 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57345f0d8fd90aa0c649b4da26cb40bf863f81c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102/EFTA02770102.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770102.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1760, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 147.378, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 463.3681945800781, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 463.3681945800781, + 118.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 147.378, + 118.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF r\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.63400000000001, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 510.0867614746094, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 510.0867614746094, + 355.8580322265625 + ], + [ + 137.63400000000001, + 355.8580322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "J. ORE TENUS MOTION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.724, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 523.906005859375, + 353.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 523.906005859375, + 370.1080017089844 + ], + [ + 143.724, + 370.1080017089844 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770102" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..519996245672fea09f6d52b6bdaa165d8305d969 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT +IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CIVIL DIVISION AG +CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB +Judge David F. [REDACTED] + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, + +Defendants. + +2011 OCT - 3 PM 4:02 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL +CIRCUIT CIVIL 5 + +**AGREED ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN +RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD PUNITIVE DAMAGES** + +**THIS MATTER** came before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Response in the above-styled case. This Court having reviewed the Motion, being advised that there is no objection to the entry of this Order, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby + +**ORDERED AND ADJUDGED** that the Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Response is Granted. Plaintiff/Counter -Defendant shall be permitted to file a Response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages and supplements thereto, in excess of ten (10) pages. + +**DONE AND ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 30 day of September, 2011. + +*3/14* +*OCT* + +David F. Crow +Circuit Judge + +Epstein v. Rothstein and , etc. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Agreed Order on Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Response Page 2 of 2 + +Copies furnished to: + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esq. Burnett, P.A. 901 Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. ;car Anerbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA. 250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f868c67d54a438026b1edc7469feac16ec526bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104/EFTA02770104.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770104.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1985, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.42, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 151.032, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 468.93, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 468.93, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 151.032, + 117.44999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AGREED ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN RESPONSE TO [REDACTED] MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD PUNITIVE DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 79.17, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 341.01 + ], + [ + 536.529, + 368.55 + ], + [ + 79.17, + 368.55 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770104" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7af286472d6cabd5ff4b40398170bd472671a865 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.md @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE +FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND +FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff, + +vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and +L.M., individually, + +Defendant, + +AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM + +[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ([REDACTED]) sues Jeffrey Epstein (EPSTEIN) and alleges: + +COUNT I—ABUSE OF PROCESS + +1. 1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. +2. 2. Counter/plaintiff, [REDACTED], is sui juris, resides in Broward County, Florida, and is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida at all times material hereto. +3. 3. Counter/defendant, EPSTEIN, is sui juris and is a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. +4. 4. EPSTEIN is a convicted felon having entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he effectively conceded his having engaged in illicit sexual activity with a large number of female children over an extended period of time in violation of both State and Federal criminal laws. + +2010CT-4 PH 4:10 +SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK +PALM BEACH COUNTY +CIRCUIT CIVIL APPROBATE + +FILED + +5. EPSTEIN was sued civilly by a large number of his victims. Many of the cases against him have been settled, and upon information and belief, federal law enforcement agencies continue to investigate additional allegations of EPSTEIN'S serial abuse and molestation of children; others remain pending. As a consequence, EPSTEIN continues to face the potential of further criminal prosecution and huge civil judgments for both compensatory and punitive damages in favor of many victims of his depraved criminal exploitation of children including victims represented by + +6. In the face of overwhelming evidence of s EPSTEIN repeatedly asserted ASINit fused to answer any substantive questions regarding his sexual exploitation ll nor victims. Lacking any substantive defense to the claims against him, EP IN sdught to avoid his compensatory and punitive liability and to deter cooperatio14/ ongoing criminal investigation by employing the extraordinary financial resources at his disposal to intimidate his victims and their legal counsel into abandoning their legit claims or resolving those claims for substantially less than their just value. his Fifth Amendment Right against self-incrimin + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 2 of 8 + +7. me circumstances, EPSTEIN's tactics have proven successful, while other victims ve s far withstood this continued assault upon them and persisted in the prosecution of their claims. clients are among those who continued the prosecution of their claims and the assertion of federal statutory rights afforded to them pursuant to the Federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 3 of 8 + +8. While prosecuting the legitimate claims on behalf of his clients, has not engaged in any unethical, illegal, or improper conduct nor has taken any action inconsistent with the duty he has to vigorously represent the interests of his clients. EPSTEIN has no reasonable basis to believe otherwise and has never had any reasonable basis to believe otherwise. + +9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN filed civil claims against and client, L.M. for the sole purpose of further attempting to i timidate L.M., and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claimsjo value. an their just and reasonable + +10. The claims filed by EPSTEIN alatNi ASIE 1, ARDS included the following: + +- a. violation of F.S. §§772.101, et. seq.— Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act; +- b. Florida R1CO—"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act" to F.S. §§895.01, et. seq.; +- c. (`abuse of process; +- d. fraud; conspiracy to commit fraud. + +÷b 11. EPSTEIN, in his Complaint, directly alleged that was a knowing participant in a civil theft and criminal enterprise when EPSTEIN was well aware that there was and is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support such false assertions. Indeed, his Complaint was replete with speculation, conjecture, and innuendo and was entirely devoid of factual + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 4 of 8 + +support for his spurious allegations. Indicative of his total disregard for the lack of any predicate for his claims, EPSTEIN ignored the statutory requirement for written notice prior to the initiation of a civil theft claim. + +12. EPSTEIN knew at the time of the filing of the specified claims apd throughout his failed prosecution of those claims that he could not prosecute the a successful conclusion because: + +- a. they were factually unsupported; +- b. he had suffered no legally cognivIct i injury proximately caused by the falsely alleged wrongdoing o Sy of a +- c. he had no intention of h Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination in order to provide the relevant and material discovery that would be necessary in the course of prosecuting the claims and that his prosecution would consequently be barred by the sword-shield doctrine; +- d. a conduct in the prosecution of claims against EPSTEIN could S.,tot support the prosecution of a separate civil lawsuit against because of the absolute protection of the litigation privilege. + +PSTEIN acted purely out of malice toward and others, and he had ulterior motives and purposes in filing his unsupported and unsupportable claims. His real purpose was to put pressure on a L.M., and other victims by publishing what amounts to nothing more than a highly defamatory press release issued under the cloak of protection of the litigation privilege. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 5 of 8 + +14. EPSTEIN'S primary purpose in both filing and continuing to prosecute each of the claims against was to inflict a maximum economic burden on in having to defend against the spurious claims, to distract from the prosecution of claims against EPSTEIN arising out of EPSTEIN'S serial abuse of minors, Itimately to extort into abandoning the claims he was prosecuting against EDWARDS. + +15. EPSTEIN'S filing and prosecution of claims against EDWARDS recklessly and purposely disregarded the lack of justification for each of the claims and EPSTEIN never had as his primary purpose to establish what he did consider orhalf li of EPSTEIN in his prosecution of every claim against . eve tion, every request for production, every subpoena issued, and every deposition ntended with respect to solely and exclusively to advance EPSTEIN'S efforts at extortion as previously detailed, and constituted a perversion of process after its initial service. + +17. A ult of EPSTEIN's wrongful conduct as alleged, has suffered and will o suffer damages including but not limited to injury to his reputation, interfere a his professional relationships, the loss of the value of his time required to be diverted from his professional responsibilities, and the cost of defending against EPSTEIN's spurious and baseless claims. + +WHEREFORE, demands judgment against EPSTEIN for compensatory damages, costs, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 6 of 8 + +circumstances. Counter/plaintiff, reserves the right to assert a claim for punitive damages upon satisfying the applicable statutory prerequisites. + +Counter/plaintiff, further demands trial by jury. + +### COUNT II—MALICIOUS PROSECUTION + +Each of the factual allegations of Paragraphs 1-17 are incorporated fl9 • each were fully set out herein and further alleges: + +18. After unsuccessful efforts to defend and prosecuted claims over a period of almost two years, EP an ongoing effort to salvage his abuse of process q conclusion defense against eac ca d an his maliciously filed and doned the claims except for abandonment brings to successful er abandoned claims. + +WHEREFORE, damages, costs, and such other a circumstances. Counter/plaint d ja' ds ...,j dgment against EPSTEIN for compensatory relief as the Court may deem appropriate under the reserves the right to assert a claim for punitive damages upon satisfying ttleapplicable statutory prerequisites. + +Counter/p\$Thzjff, further demands trial by jury. + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 7 of 8 + +1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attache this q I day of October, 20j 1. + +a ar No.: 169440 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 + +enney Scarola BamhaCSIiipley, P.A. Attorneys for I. Edwards + +adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Amended Counterclaim Page 8 of 8 + +# COUNSEL LIST + +Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 + +Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 + +Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 745-5849 Fax: (954) 745-3556 + +L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Burnett, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561) 802-9044 Fax: (561) 802-9976 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.metadata.json b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bce48029a03d3c0fdda37e9309a1841e4517c6d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106/EFTA02770106.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770106.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 9675, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 307.224, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 70.557 + ], + [ + 533.052, + 112.72900000000001 + ], + [ + 307.224, + 112.72900000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 217.87199999999999, + 320.34499999999997 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 320.34499999999997 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 334.13199999999995 + ], + [ + 217.87199999999999, + 334.13199999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT I\u2014ABUSE OF PROCESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 375.493 + ], + [ + 395.96400000000006, + 375.493 + ], + [ + 395.96400000000006, + 389.28 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 389.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT II\u2014MALICIOUS PROSECUTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.355, + 213.29299999999998 + ], + [ + 421.0871276855469, + 213.29299999999998 + ], + [ + 421.0871276855469, + 228.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 186.355, + 228.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNSEL LIST", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.62, + 130.08 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 130.08 + ], + [ + 351.4582824707031, + 145.863037109375 + ], + [ + 256.62, + 145.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 31 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02770106" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770114/EFTA02770114.md b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770114/EFTA02770114.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c9e158393a1cb1544123a6cc21625472a7dc46c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-epstein-v-rothstein/EFTA02770114/EFTA02770114.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +• + +IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION + +JEFFREY EPSTEIN, + +Plaintiff(s), vs. + +SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., + +Defendant(s). + +CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG ss + +> -ow . re, Tr 5 a' • n'xT, t • - I --n. cIncck -•o ' S0 CY. + +## ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPledyTc. + +AP4, THIS CAUSE came before 'the Court upon the Defendant, lifigElLEY Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaini served August 23, 2011. The Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response, and other Memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion. The Court has also reviewed the various authorities cited by the parties. Based upon review of the above, as well as being otherwise fully advised in the in premises, it is + +CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: + +It is well established upon Motion to Dismiss that this Court is limited to a review of the four corners of the Complaint and the well pled allegations therein. A Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits the well pled facts in the Complaint and reasonable inferences therefrom and the allegations must be construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Applying this standard to the four corners of the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Court finds that the allegations are sufficient to plead a cause of • action for "abuse of process" against the Defendant The overwhelming majority of the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss deal with the truthfulness of the allegations against the Defendant, affirmative defenses that may be available to the Defendant, as well as the references outside the four corners + +of the Complaint. These matters are more appropriately the subject matter of a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or defense at trial. + +Based upon the foregoing, the Motion to Di iss is hereby denied. + +DONE AND ORDERED this • —day of O tuber, 2011 at W : 'alm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. + +DAVID F. + +CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE + +Copy furnished: + +JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West ach, FL 33409 + +L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 + +MARC NUFMS.UIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +GARY M. , JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 + +WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, 02116 \ No newline at end of file